Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2006-062 Resolution Denying a Request to Vacate Portion of ROW & Utility & Drainage Easement on Shawnee Woods RdMember Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2006-62 RESOLUTION DENYING A REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON SHAWNEE WOODS ROAD WHEREAS, Steven Theesfeld and Elizabeth Theesfeld (the "Applicants") have requested that the city vacate the easterly 347 feet of Shawnee Woods Road right-of-way and related drainage and utility easements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said request, the city council of the city of Medina (the "City") conducted a public hearing on the proposed vacation on September 5, 2006; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Applicants spoke in favor of the vacation and two persons owning or having an interest in properties affected by the vacation provided written or oral testimony in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS, City staff, after reviewing the request, recommended denial thereof because land use changes in the area which may take place within the reasonably foreseeable future make vacation of the right-of-way premature at this time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, that the proposed vacation be denied because the upcoming adoption of the decennial comprehensive plan for the community and land use changes which may occur in the vicinity of Shawnee Woods Road within the reasonably foreseeable future make vacation of the right-of-way or utility easements premature at this time and not in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Applicants be given a credit of $500 against the costs associated with a same or similar application made within a reasonable period of time following adoption of the new comprehensive plan provided that the Applicants fully reimburse the City for all costs and expenses, including administrative, legal and engineering fees, associated with this application. Dated: September 19, 2006. B ce D. Workman, Mayor ATTEST: Get Chad M. Adams, Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Brinkman and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Brinkman, Workman, Smith and the following voted against same: (Absent: Weir, Cavanaugh) None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2006-62 2 September 19, 2006