HomeMy Public PortalAbout2006-074 Resolution Approving PUD Amendment for Ryan Companies for Wells Fargo at Clydesdale Marketplace 2nd AdditionMember Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-74
APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR RYAN
COMPANIES US INC. FOR WELLS FARGO LOCATED IN MEDINA
CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, Ryan Companies US, Inc., (the "Applicant") has requested approval of a
PUD (Planned Unit Development) Amendment for a Wells Fargo Bank (the
"Development") on property legally as Lot 1, Block 1, Medina Clydesdale Marketplace
2nd Addition (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the PUD plan has previously been reviewed and approved by the city
council of the city of Medina (the "City"); and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has now requested approval of a PUD Amendment, which
has been reviewed by the City for conformance with the land use regulations of the City.
WHEREAS, the PUD Amendment was reviewed by the planning commission at its
meeting on September 13, 2006 and, following public hearing thereon as required by law,
the planning commission recommended denial thereof; and
WHEREAS, the city council on October 3, 2006 reviewed the PUD Amendment for its
conformance with the City's ordinances, considered the recommendations of the planning
commission and heard comments from the Applicant and other interested parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve
the PUD Amendment, subject to the following conditions:
1. A PUD final plan is approved to allow the creation of the Development in
accordance with the plans received by the City on September 21, 2006, except as
amended by this resolution and stamped final approval by the City. The final
PUD Amendment Plan applies to the Property.
2. Approval of the PUD Amendment is contingent upon City approval of the final
plat of Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 2nd Addition.
Lighting:
3. The parking lot lights must meet the City's lighting ordinance, including curfew
limitations.
Resolution No. 2006-74
October 17, 2006
1
4. Signage lighting must follow the lighting ordinance and sign lighting details must
be submitted for review and approval by City staff.
5. Light fixture specifications and a lighting fixture count must be provided on the
lighting plan.
6. The lighting plan must be revised to identify the pole height. The Code allows a
maximum height of 30-feet with a pole base maximum height of 30 inches.
7. The applicant shall provide details on any proposed building mounted lights and
canopy lights.
Landscaping:
8. The developer should work to reduce the impervious area to 60%.
9. The developer shall work with City staff to revise the landscape plan to ensure
proper screening for the residents to the north.
Parking:
10. The proposed DO NOT ENTER sign shown near the trash enclosure shall be
moved to the south west along the curb to the same location as the proposed
STOP sign.
Architectural and Design Standards:
11. All trash and recycling enclosures must be located inside the principal building
and will be reviewed and approved by City staff
Signage:
12. All signs shall be in compliance with the sign matrix approved by staff dated June
20, 2005.
13. The sign dimensions must be shown on the north, east and west building
elevations.
Other:
14. No construction work of any kind may take place within the Development except
Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m.
15. The applicant shall comply with the engineer memos dated August 18, 2006 and
September 27, 2006.
16. The cover sheet on the September 21, 2006 plan submittal shall be revised to
reflect the current site plan with the 20-foot fire lane.
17. The fire lane must be signed for no parking.
Resolution No. 2006-74
October 17, 2006
2
18. The drive -though canopy must not extend over the fire lane area.
NOW THEREFORE, be it further resolved that all terms and conditions of the original
Medina Clydesdale Marketplace PUD shall remain in full force and effect, except as
explicitly amended herein.
Dated: October 17, 2006
Bruce D. Workman, Mayor
Attest:
Chad M. Adams, City Administrator - Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Weir upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Weir, Workman, Cavanaugh, Smith
And the following voted against same: (Absent: Brinkman)
None
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-74
October 17, 2006
3