HomeMy Public PortalAboutPlanning Commission - Minutes - 2017-02-28 - RegularCITY OF TEMPLE CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, February 28, 2017, 7:30 P.M.
City Council Chambers, 5938 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City
www.templecity.us
OPENING MATTERS:
• Call to Order
• Roll Call:
PRESENT: Commissioner—Cordes, Leung, O'Leary, Marston
ABSENT: Commissioner—Haddad
ALSO PRESENT: Community Development Director Forbes, Planning Manager Reimers, City
Attorney Murphy, Management Analyst Coyne, and Planning Secretary Venters
Commissioner O'Leary made a motion to excuse Chairman Haddad for due cause. Seconded by
Commissioner Leung and unanimously carried.
• Pledge of Allegiance
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS / PUBLIC COMMENT: NONE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
1. Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 2017
Commissioner O'Leary made a motion to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated
January 24, 2017. Seconded by Commissioner Cordes and was approved unanimously by the
following votes:
AYES:
Commissioner—Cordes, Leung, O'Leary, Marston
ABSTAIN:
Commissioner — None
NOES:
Commissioner — None
ABSENT:
Commissioner — Haddad
PAGE 1 OF 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 28. 2017
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
2. File: PL 16-579. Zoning Code Amendment. The proposed ordinance would amend the
Temple City Municipal Code (TCMC) Title 9, Chapter 1 (Zoning Code) to modify regulations
pertaining to accessory dwelling units and administrative changes to Title 5 and 9 of the TCMC
to carry out the provisions of this amendment.
Address: Citywide
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from CEQA
and adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council
adopt the proposed ordinance.
Management Analyst Coyne gave a brief summary of the staff report.
Planning Manager Reimers asked the Planning Commission for direction regarding additional criteria
to include in the proposed ordinance to reduce the appearance of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU):
1) ADU's would only be allowable on the rear 50 percent of the rear lot, 2) the total amount of non -
habitable accessory structures would be limited to up to three structures per property and 1,800
square feet, 3) and that ADU's would have access to open space separated by a fence.
City Attorney Murphy stated that per Assembly Bill 2299 and Senate Bill 1069, ADU's are allowable by
right however, the Planning Commission has the ability to limit the amount of non -habitable
accessory structures, limit floor area ratio, and limit lot coverage. He added that all accessory
structures would be required to meet building code standards in order to be converted to an ADU.
Commissioner O'Leary asked Planning Manager Reimers for an example of a legal nonconforming
structure and if an accessory structure such as a garage with a narrow setback could have windows
facing the neighboring property.
Planning Manager Reimers stated that guest houses would become a legal nonconforming structure.
He stated that accessory structures will still have to abide by the Los Angeles County building code
standards to be converted to an ADU.
Acting -Chair Marston opened the public hearing. No one from the public came forward therefore;
the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Leung stated that he is not in favor of additional fencing within the lot but, he would
like open space to be distinct by design.
Commissioner Cordes read a section of Assembly Bill 2299. He is not in favor of a five foot rear yard
setback for ADU's, nor is he in favor of a garage converted to an ADU with no setback.
PAGE 2 OF 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 28, 2017
Planning Manager Reimers stated that staff could require a deeper setback but advised against
making the setback too large as staff would like to encourage newly constructed ADU's so that
additional parking would be required.
City Attorney Murphy suggested that a ten -foot rear yard setback be required for newly constructed
ADU's. He stated that existing accessory structures could be converted to an ADU regardless of the
setback as long it meets the building code requirements.
Commissioner Leung made a motion to approve PL 16-579, adopt the resolution recommending that
the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance, with the additional recommendations made by staff
as follows; that a detached ADU is only allowable in the rear 50.
percent of the property with the exception of second story units, a newly constructed detached ADU
is required to have a 10 foot rear yard setback, there shall be a maximum of two accessory structures
per property, all ADU's shall have access to open space and be distinct by design and adjacent to the
structure, that the cumulative square footage for ADU's shall not exceed 1,800 square feet, and find
that the project is categorically exempt. Seconded by Commissioner O'Leary and carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
Commissioner—Cordes, Leung, O'Leary, Marston
ABSTAIN:
Commissioner — None
NOES:
Commissioner — None
ABSENT:
Commissioner — Haddad
3. File: PL 17-599. Adoption of traffic related thresholds of significance for reviewing projects in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Address: Citywide
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution finding
that the project is exempt from CEQA and recommending that the City
Council adopt traffic related thresholds of significance for reviewing
projects in compliance with CEQA.
PAGE 3 OF 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 28, 2017
Planning Manager Reimers gave a brief summary of the staff report.
City Attorney Murphy stated that if the City does not modify the thresholds of significance an EIR
would likely be required for traffic impacts on larger properties which would delay future
developments.
Acting -Chair Marston opened the public hearing.
Lucy Liu, GPAC member, stated that the GPAC thought that the methodology of thresholds of
significance made sense and complements the mid-century plan. She added that an ordinance for
the thresholds of significance does not make it easier to develop in the City but would save time for
developers that meet the criteria.
Acting -Chair Marston closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Cordes made a motion to approve PL 17-599, adopt the resolution recommending
that the City Council adopt the Ordinance, and find that the project is categorically exempt. Seconded
by Commissioner O'Leary and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Commissioner—Cordes, Leung, O'Leary, Marston
ABSTAIN:
Commissioner — None
NOES:
Commissioner — None
ABSENT:
Commissioner — Haddad
DISCUSSION ITEM(S):
t�04ro n
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS:
S. Planning Manager's Report
Planning Manager Reimers updated the Commission that the proposed karaoke establishment
has withdrawn their application of appeal and that Kanghohong Baekjeong (the Korean BBQ
restaurant) will go before the City Council to have their hours of operation reviewed. He
announced that over 150 cases have been opened by Community Preservation and 90 percent
of those cases were proactive (staff initiated). He stated that Community Preservation primarily
focused on holiday lights and is currently seeking overgrown vegetation.
6. Comments from Commissioners
PAGE 4 OF 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 28, 2017
Acting -Chair Marston asked Planning Manager Reimers for an update regarding 5701
Rosemead Boulevard, the previous Applebee's restaurant.
Planning Manager Reimers stated that parking is a challenge however, the property owner is
looking to restripe the parking lot.
Commissioner Cordes mentioned that Acting -Chair Marston was highlighted in the Los
Angeles Times.
PAGE 5 OF 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 28, 2017
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission Regular Meeting was adjourned at 9:06 p.m.
Acting -Chair
7c�rZary
PAGE 6 OF 6