HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD14101 BILL NO. 2006-68
• SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN LAYTON
ORDINANCE NO. 14 i a I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, APPROVING A PUD PLAN
AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY ADDRESSED AS 4935 OLD LOHMAN ROAD; LOCATED IN PART
OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 44, RANGE
12, JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI.
WHEREAS, Cole County Public Water Supply District Number One, owner of the real estate hereinafter
described, having submitted to the City Council An Amended PUD Plan of said real estate,
being located in Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri, and more particularly described as
follows: Part of the west half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 44, Range 12,
Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri. Containing 2.0 acres.
WHEREAS, it appears that the procedures set forth in the zoning code relating to zoning have in all
matters been complied with, as said property owner submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council a PUD Plan Amendment for the above referenced property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON,
MISSOURI,AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The PUD Plan Amendment submitted by Cole County Public Water Supply
District Number One, on file as Case No. P06034 in the Jefferson City Planning Division is hereby
approved for the above land referenced herein.
SECTION 2. The following principal land uses are approved for the site: Existing water tank;
new telecommunications tower and equipment shelters.
• SECTION 3. Approval is made subject to the following conditions: (1) Overall height not to
exceed 195 feet; (2) Provide certifications as required by the building regulations division; (3)
Compliance with Engineering Division recommendations and corrections to the site plan.
SECTION 4. Common Areas and Public Land: No common areas are proposed and no
lands are dedicated to public use with this PUD Plan.
SECTION 5. Access: Vehicular access will be obtained from Old Lohman Road via an existing
private drive.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its
passage andApprro oval. /
Passed: �/��1 , I LG' . ��/%�!� Approve�C���
PresrTe: cer ayor
A A=DRK
ly Cler City ounselor
• 1
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
PUD Plan Amendment•4935 Old Lohman Road
• The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public hearing on Monday, October
16, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320
East McCarty Street,to consider a PUD Plan Amendment for the property described herein:
Section 1. The subject property, containing 2.0 acres, is addressed as 4935 Old Lohman
Road and is described as follows: Part of the west halt of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18,
Township 44, Range 12, Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri.
Section 2. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider an application for a PUD Plan
Amendment for the construction of a 195 foot telecommunications tower on the 2.0 acre site of
the water tower owned by Cole County Public Water Supply District Number One. The
application was filed by Cole County Public Water Supply District Number One, property owner,
and is zoned PUD Planned Unit Development. The complete application is on file as Case No.
P06034 and Is available for inspection during regular business hours at the Department of
Community Development, Planning Division, Room 120, John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320
East McCarty Street, Jefferson City, Missouri.
Phyllis Powell, City Clerk
City of Jefferson, Missouri
P.T. - Friday, September 29, 2006
Department of Community Development/Planning Division
320 East McCarty Street, Room 120
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan
• (573) 634-6475 Fax(573) 634.6457
•
all w`�i�r Cii •
m SPIN
loggia
��: : •� � � iii � . _ ,; . +.� � _
nn . ■Nt�wrA� Attn j � ■li ei'•iir r t11M :�
- • = ' � ��ra j�I IAIAIII � ����
• i� NINON s �
a
a
a ,
s. R46" " 'T
,4W4
tie
lei
it
.
11 . 1........... . 10
All
" L
•r t
�I
�ir • Y
N'-44
Jo-
sm � Uaic � '3
01 � � N G � v a^ ' � •� N
CO ¢ o - °
�p -C- (D N a o d
cn•.G-�y y � r .T G G N r � N m C1 d
nr -, to °
w
V/ J
to
OD
O b
p '9fir t
W "
CD
e
0 0
Q) :° 0 a = N
ter' a� v � d
U
Co
p o F- O ww p L Q onCD m
d 0 � oo
CD 0 0( 00 ,
'D
n > c c rn a o
m m =oc .4
• � � o O o 3 e 2 3 N o
❑ L) o L c o vi
CL i M b
1
I�r
i r'•
LO ;
r a..
O Y
i� .✓( • T Jt
1 i
F t
� m
co U)
N C 20 .0 N
2 01 010 N > p �• T yl N CM
Q)
m darn
U O O N Ca t6 O N Y Q1
U p O) O L f0 C C
D) Co O U O C O O N td C O
C C U r0 � � C L .., 0) O N S+
'p "(D L O •� O C •p U '� p
cm O a 0o r O
OI O 1 C 7 C O C c�9 O LO
Q O y 3 h
C C O O O 'O N
0 > d O 1_
. ■ Q 0 U •U U
w,
t,
.ati+
Or r
r
a
cc 3 ' to •v .0 " T-
T
�c j
C .,0
{ 1 O 7 d j N G _ @ f0 r t
r U V U O O V y p7 v .O 1
10 W
G1 C 0 =Q ° N p N
■ QU ~
■
O �
O
0
x
Or.yn •1•�,. I•.
1
• , t�,
C
C) •- •• Cam: ' ��` , �.� • ' ;• , • _
U
co
ca
a
O > L '� 'D > N .O�.p• Y
cn
O C O U j U
_O 'D �
1 n t O " y p �, N .V
1 7 > O
• O r E 7 C 0 0 O } O S3
C Q' C O O O U Cl '6 N r T
P.
P. 2
• APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO FINAL PUP_j?LAN
EAUG auved
Cityof Jefferson -Planning Division n
Depa rtment of Community Development T1 '
320 East McCarty street
Jefferson City,Missouri 65101 DEPARTMENT OF
Phone(5731634-6410 Far(573)63e{457 COMMUNITY OEVELOPM NT
The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson,
Missouri,for an AMENDMENT to the approved PUD Plan for the following property:
ProjoctNamo: T-Mobile MO-08-706 Cole Co. Water District
ProjactAddross: 4935 Old Lohman Road, J el . rrson City,MU bb l 0'9
Describe-Amondmoni: Amend P an to ailow tor a e ecommunlca 71"Y'Cy
Please attach the following:
(a) Typed project narrative describing, in detail.the requested amendment,including affected area In
square feet. Include project name and location on the project narrative sheet.If the amendment Is
for signago, Include a copy of the sign application and sign detail.
(b) . Rendering or sketch of affected area and proposed change,if applicable. -
(c) Filing fee(see Instructions):Major.5200+ $20(ter acre. Minor:$100
Applicant Information: pbli W
Property Owner N,ame: u c ater Supply District No 1 , Cole County
Address 4935 Old Lohmnn Rd ,
Phone Number(s): 573-893-2848
Other ApplicanttConsullant(Attocryry Pro'ect/Apph'cant Information Sheet if more space is necessary)
Name: T-Mobile c/o )'tile A Associates
Address: r ' Kudu, #10b, Creve Coeur. Mo 63141
• Phone Number(s): 314-517-3463(ce111 314-754-9903 (fax)
The attached Information accurately represents all of the changes proposed for this project.
A* f PIXI-) Ruth Winters -nh
Pf,,Opbvv weer Bignawre Printed Numo Dal
Mary Kreps .on behalf T-Mobile 6/8/06
Consult nt or Reprmnlaill ve Printed Name Date
For City use only:
• Major Amendment:Referred to Planning and Zoning Commission
• MlnorAmendment
O List Previous Case Numbers:
0 Previous Testimony? -From persons at any prior public meeting(Such persons shall be notified of
the proposed amendment a minimum of seven days prior to taking any action on the request.)
0 Department Declslon
Donlad/Approved/Conditionally Approved on thls dayof
List any conditions
SignociMflo
....._......................................................_..,..(......................p.-..................................�_._.....f_......__.._._......_»..._.__^__......._.
Application Filing Foe Received.,_Cash Indicate rocel f N 1 Deck check# j
Attachments• _Narrative _Map _ApplicanVFmJact Information Shent
Page 1 of 2 =002
Civil Engineaing 530A East Independence Drive
O H AN
-Land Surveying
• eure Union, Missouri 63084
-Slit Develo pment
Telephone:636.584.0540
•
-General Confulling Fax:636.584.0512
Muter Planning
E•Mail:mail®cochrancng.corn
September 13,2006
Ms. Mary L. Kreps Sent Via: Email (mkreps @rcriley.com)
R.C.Riley&Associates, LLC
745 Craig Road,Suite 106
Creve Coeur,MO 63141
RE: Cole County P.W.S.D.No. I
Cochran Project No. 06-2775
Dear Ms.Kreps:
I have reviewed the specifications that you provided for a proposed antennae system for the Old Lohman
Road elevated storage tank, owned by Cole County P.W.S.D. No. 1. Based oil the maximum
configuration consisting of the mounting platform,cable and twelve(12)antennae,the total weight would
be 6,456 pounds. The tank was designed with a factor of safety to accommodate loads created by
additional accessories, but not to a level that would permit the loads created by the proposed antennae
• system.
As you know, the additional load would be transferred through the steel tank to the reinforced concrete
footings, which were designed In accordance with standard loading requirements based on the allowable
bearing pressure of the soil. In my opinion,the entire foundation of the tank would need to be replaced to
permit the proposed additional loads,
Further consideration of Installing the proposed antennae on the tank is not recommended. Even if the
installation was practical based on structural requirements, 1 suspect that potentially there would be
opposition due to aesthetic issues.
Le me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey L.Blackman,P.E.
Cochran
JLB/djs
cc: Cole County P.W.S.D.No. I Board of Directors
David Kempf
•
• T-Mobile MO-08-706 Cole County Water District
4935 Old Lohman Road,Jefferson City,MO 65109
PROJECT SUMMARY
Petitioner
T-Mobile USA (T-Mobile) is one of the fastest growing nationwide wireless carriers. T-Mobile is a
member of the T-Mobile International Group, the mobile telecommunications subsidiary of Deutsche
Tcickom AG. Deutsche Telckom and its subsidiaries and affiliates provide wireless services to
approximately 72 million customers worldwide. T-Mobile and its affiliates have licenses to provide
service to 95 percent of the U.S. population. T-Mobile is licensed by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC)and regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA).
T-Mobile offers consumers, businesses and enterprise customers the most advanced mobile
communications services available today, including voice, two-way text messaging, and high-speed
wireless data services. T-Mobile operates the largest all digital, wireless network based exclusively on
GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) technology. GSM is the most widely used digital
standard worldwide, accounting for more than 70 percent of the total digital wireless market. GSM's
proven, feature-rich digital technology provides customers with integrated voice, high-speed data, paging
and short message service capabilities,as well as excellent sound quality and call reliability.
• Site Selection
Once the decision has been made to expand wireless coverage to a community, T-Mobile engineers prepare
a preliminary network design based on many factors, including the characteristics of the community,
available radio frequencies and wireless equipment capabilities, A map of the selected "search area" and
other requirements for the site are provided to property consultants who visit the community to identify and
rank potential sites. This Search Area represents the area in which a facility must be located to allow it to
function as an integral unit in T-Mobile's system.
Whenever feasible, T-Mobile strives to acquire sites that bland with local character and are unobtrusive to
the community. Existing structures such as water tanks, building rooftops, and competitor-owned towers
are oflcn the first choice for sites. When construction of a new structure is required, sites are chosen by
their proximity to compatible land uses. It is important to remember that wireless communication facilitics
must be considered as part of a network, not as individual locations. Communication facilities can be
likened to links in a chain, one link adds to the next, making ilia network design larger. Once these links,or
communication facilities, are constructed, it is difficult to adjust the network design or move individual
sites.
Property Description
The proposed facility will be located at 4935 Lohnnan Road,Jefferson City, Missouri, The subject parcel is
owned by Cole County Water District. The parcel is located within the PUD(Planned Urban Development)
Zoning District. T-Mobile will be leasing a 70' x 50' parcel of the property located in the southeastern
• portion of the property. Access will be via an existing access road off Old Lohman Road.
Nature of Request/Zoning Analysis
• T-Mobilc is requesting an amendment to the Final PUD Plan and any other pcmnits necessary to allow the
construction of a wireless facility consisting of a 195' monopole and accompanying equipment cabinets.T-
Mobile will locate the monopole within the 3500' leased area. The lower will be built to accommodate
multiple carrier's antennas and T-Mobile has leased enough ground space to accommodate multiple
carrier's equipment.
Components and Operations
Each communication facility consists of a lower or other support structure and various wireless installations,
including base station equipment. Once construction of the facility is complete and the telephone switching
equipment is fine-tuned, visitation to the site by service personnel for routine maintenance will occur an
average of once a month. The site is entirely self-monitored and connects directly to a central office where
sophisticated computers alcrl personnel to any equipment malfunction or breach of security.
Because the communication facility will be unstaffed, there are no regular hours of operation and no impact
to existing traffic patterns. Water or sewer services are not required. Ingress and egress is already provided
along with parking for service personnel who arrive infrequently to service the site.
Statement Regarding Nuisances
No nuisances will be generated by the proposed modifications. The only facilities necessary for this site are
telephone and electric facilities which are already provided. The facility will be unstaffed, will have no
• impact on traffe and will involve no loading or unloading of supplies. Further, no materials will be handled,
stored, discharged or discarded. The only noise generated by the operation of a wireless communications
facility will be that from standard heating and cooling units. The proposed facility will not injure the public
health,safety,morals or general welfare.
Compliance with Federal Regulations
T-Mobile will comply with all FCC rules governing construction requirements, technical standards,
interference protection, power and height limitations, and radio frequency standards. In addition, the
company will comply with all FAA rules on site location and operation.
•
KUNi;F.L& ASSOCINFES. INC.
1440 Maple Avenue, Suite Q Phone: (630) 729.10001 Fax: (630) 929.9785
Lisle, Illinois 60532 E•Mail: mainotfice @kunkelassociates.com
August 19,2005
Ms. Kelly Sinkler
T-Mobile
8550 W. Bryn Mawr Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60631
Re: Impact to Surrounding Property Values Created by Communications Towers
(File 95081605))
Dear Ms. Sinkler:
Pursuant to your request, this letter has been compiled to provide you and your colleagues with
an overview of my experience relative to evaluating the impact on surrounding property values
created by installation of wireless communications towers, specifically monopole towers with
associated equipment shelters at the ground level.
• As you are aware, I have extensive experience in evaluating the effect on surrounding properties
ofsites ofthis type.*file following is a brief synopsis ofthat experience.
For your general information, I am the owner and president of the real estate appraisal/consuhing
firi shown on the above letterhend. I have been directly invoived in the valuation and analysis
of real estate of all types since 1981. 1 hold the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute,am
licensed with the State of Illinois as a Certified General Appraiser, and additionally ant a
licensed real estate broker in Illinois, holding the commercial brokerage designation of CCIM. A
more detailed summary of my educational and professional background, as well as my
experience in the real estate valuation/consultation field, is attached,
Specifically with regard to the type of situation you have called upon me to address,my firm has
been involved in a number of consultation assignments specific to this issue over the past 8 to 10
years. All of these assignments have been in the Chicago metropolitan area, including the
communities of Aurora, Barrington, Barrington Hills, Buffalo Grove, Chicago, Glencoe,
Homewood, Lincolnshire, Kenilworth, Maple Park, Midlothian, North Barrington, Oak Forest,
Streamwood, Vernon !dills, Westmont, Willow Springs and Winnetka. These locations have
involved a variety of neighborhood types, including residential, commercial, industrial, and
farmland. The work we have performed in each case has varied, ranging from providing written
studies on specific sites, to giving presentations at Village hearings and/or testifying in court for
litigation matters relating to this property type.
• Ms. Kelly Sinkler
T-Mobile
Page Two
August 19, 2005
In the process of completing these assigmnents, the request specifically made of us in each case
has been to determine what effect, if any, a communications tower site may have on the value of
surrounding andlor nearby properties. Of significant importance to these consultation
assignments is the following: We are not paid, nor do we accept assignments in which a specific
position on this issue is advocated. Our sole impetus is to be entirely objective, providing sound
reasoning for our conclusions, and based upon the actions and reactions of the buying and selling
real estate market.
In each of these situations our basic plan of analysis has been twofold. first, we have researched
property sales, including all details of the transactions and the physical characteristics of the
properties involved, fn order to ascertain if any difference in actual sale prices could be detected
due to location near or in view of a communications tower. The basic premise of this analysis
type is founded in the principles of real estate valuation commonly accepted and utilized by all
courts of law, governmental bodies, and major banks. This premise is that of the direct
comparison of physical and locational characteristics of properties that have sold, resulting in a
determination of the market reaction, if any, to various factors relative to those properties, and
expressed in dollars.
• The second aspect of our analysis plan has been to interview and consult with other real estate
professionals, specifically those directly involved in the marketing and sale of properties, to
discover their opinions of this sane issue, relative to their daily professional lives in dealing
directly with buyers and sellers of real estate.
As we have completed these assignments, we have determined essentially three categories of
potential impact and concern exist,These categories are as follows:
1) Ein,h omaental-The potential for pollution of the air, surface, and/or sub-surface.
2) Health-The potential impact on nearby inhabitants and/or property users.
3) Vien,-The potential impact on nearby inhabitants and/or property users.
In the process of completing the aforementioned consultation assignments, we have completed
the above two step analysis plan on 40 to 50 locations involving wireless communications
facilities; several of which we have analyzed during separate time periods. As mentioned above,
these locations involved a variety of property types (residential, commercial, etc,), however
approximately 35 to 40 of these were residential in character. Although every situation has the
potential for unique variables, our experience with those locations analyzed have repeatedly
resulted in the following 5 points of finding:
•
DAVID A.KUNKEL&ASSOCIATES,INC.
• Ms. Kelly Sinkicr
T-Mobile
Page Three
August 19, 2005
I) To our knowledge there is no evidence to suggest that any environmental or health issues
arise as a result of communications tower sites.
2) To our knowledge there is no perception, within the general buying and selling real estate
populace, suggesting any environmental or health issues arise as a result of
communications tower sites.
3) We have found no ascertainable difference in properly values as a result of this specific
locational characteristic.
4) Market evidence of the lack of an ascertainable difference in property values as a result
of this specific locational characteristic has been reiterated repeatedly by other rent estate
professionals.
5) Changes in market 'values, specifically appreciation, are not restrained as a result of this
specific locational characteristic.
• Although every situation is different and should be evaluated independently, it has been my
opinion in each of these cases that no negative impact on the use, enjoyment, or value of
surrounding properties resulted from the construction of facilities of this type.
If I can be of further service please contact me.
Sincerely,
DAYID A. KUNKCL&ASSOCIATES, INC.
David A. Kunkel, MAICCIM
President
Attachment
•
DAVIDA.Kumm.&ASSOCIATES INC.
• QUALIFICATION SUMMARY - DAVID A. KUNKEL, MAI, CCIM
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Metropolitan State University, St. Paul, Minnesota
Successfully completed the following courses/examinations sponsored by the American Institute
of Real Estate Appraisers: "IA-I" Real Estate Appraisal Principles (03181); "IA-2" Basic
Valuation Procedures (05/81); "IB-1" Capitalization Theory Techniques, Part 1 (09/81); "I8-2"
Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part 2 (03183); "I B-3" Capitalization 111eory and
Techniques, Pan 3 (11/81); "2-1" Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation (12/84); "2-2" Valuation
Analysis and Report Writing (11185); "2-3" Standards of Professional Practice (03/84); "8-2"
Residential Valuation (09/83); MAI Comprehensive Examination (02/89).
Successfully challenged the following examinations sponsored by the Society of Real Estate
Appraisers: "101" An Introduction to Appraising Real Property (11/88); "102" Applied
Residential Property Valuation (11/88); "201" Principles of Income Property Appraising (11/88);
"202" Applied Income Property Valuation (11/88).
Successfully challenged the following examinations sponsored by the National Association of
Independent Fee Appraisers: Residential Member Examination (12/87); Senior Member
Examination (10/88).
Attend numerous real estate and appraisal-related educational programs on an on-going basis.
• PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
MAI Designation 118128, Appraisal Institute
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser-- IU153.0000198
CCIM Designation i l l 1909. CCIM Institute of the National Association of Realtors
Licensed Real Estate Broker-- IL11075-085008
Member: DeKalb Area Association of Realtors
Member: Realtor Association of West/South Suburban Chicagoland
Member: Illinois Association of Realtors
Member: Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals (ICAP)
Member: Multiple Listing Service of Northern Illinois, Inc.
Member:National Association of Realtors
Lifetime Member: National Eagle Scout Association (NESA)
Member of the following Chambers of Commerce:Joliet, Lisle, Naperville, and Wheaton
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
08/87 to present - President, DAVID A. KUNKEL d ASSOCIATES, INC.
12/85 to 08/87 - Vice President, The Appraisal Company
04/84 to 12/85 - Managing Partner, Kunkel & Wnek Realty Consultants
03/83 to 04/84 - Sole proprietor, David A. Kunkel &Associates
08/82 to 03/83 - Appraiser, Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, Real Estate Dept.
01/81 to 08/82 - Staff Appraiser, Joseph A. Renzi &Associates, Inc.
•
DAVID A.KUNKEL&ASSOCIATES.INC
• QUALIFICATION SUMMARY - DAVID A. KUNKEL, MAI, CCIM - (continued)
Experienced in the preparation of appraisals for sale, acquisition, leasing, tax assessment,
insurance, condemnation and mortgage lending purposes of all properly types, including
appraisals in the states of Alabama, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan,
Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee and Wisconsin.
Qualified as an expert witness in the Circuit Courts of Cook, DuPage and Lake Counties in
Illinois,as well as the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Qualified as an expert witness before the Property Tax Appeal Board for the State of Illinois, as
well as in the Counties of Cook, DuPage and Lake.
Testified before various planning and zoning commissions in the City of Chicago and
surrounding suburban areas.
Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB) Certified USPAI' Instructor.
Approved course instructor for The Appraisal Institute,
Adjunct Faculty Member; Real Estate Department/Business School,Triton College.
Guest speaker at various Real Estate related seminars and business meetings.
• Member of the 1993 Urban Valuation Delegation to Latvia and Russia sponsored by People to
People International.
COMMITTEE PARTICIPATION - APPRAISAL INSTITUTE
Have served on various committees with the Appraisal Institute, including: RM Admissions;
MAI/RM Candidate Guidance; Legislative and State Activities; Public Relations/External
Affairs; Ethics & Counseling (Region 111); Political Affairs; International Relations; MAI
(General) Admissions; Media Resource.
ASSIGNMENTS COMPLETED
Typical assignments have included:
Alley vacations Office buildings
Apartments Planned unit developments
Banks Recreational facilities
Car washes Restaurants
Churches Schools
Commercial buildings Service stations
Condominiums and co-operatives Single-family residences
Easements Shopping centers
Industrial buildings Transportation right-of-ways
Lodging facilities Unimproved land sites
Mortuary buildings Utility casements
•
DAVID A.KUNKEI.&As ociATES.INC.
Mobile
2004 Westport Center Dr.
St. Louis, MO 63146
Phone:314.812-3600
Fax:314-812-3692
Engineering Statement
Re:MO-08-70613
To Whom it May Concern:
This documentation Is intended to provide technical clarification for n proposed tower to be located at 4935
Old Lohman Rd.
T-Mobile continues to develop a system to provide improved wireless telecommunications technology to
the Jefferson City area. The design of our system consists of a network of antenna locations,where cacti
location may be Lion-uniformly spaced. T-Mobile strives to design its system using existing structures. In
this instance we have considered all options of existing structures. We have evaluated the proposed
location at heights of 195', 150' and 100'.
The coverage objective of the proposed antenna location is to provide in-building service to the
neighborhoods south of Hwy 50 near Country Club Rd.and near Westview Rd;also we desire to provide
increased in-building service to the neighborhoods north of liwy 50 near Rainbow Dr. Currently we have
• no in-building coverage In any of those areas. A proposed site at this location with a height of 195' would
enable us to meet 100%of this objective.
At a height of 150',our in-building coverage would be compromised in the neighborhoods near Rainbow
Dr.,north of Idwy 50,and in dnc neighborhoods near London Way,southeast of the site location,as
Indicated on the map. Also,at 150' we would lose 25%of our in-building coverage that we would have at
195'.
By co-locating on Ilse water tank on the property,our antenna height would be 100'. At this height,we
would not only completely lose in-building coverage in the above mentioned neighborhood near London
Way,and north of the highway near Rainbow Dr.,but we would also begin losing coverage in the
neighborhood on the northwest side of Scruggs Station Rd„near S. Brooks Dr. At this height We Would
lose 50%of the in-building coverage Ihal we would have at 195'.
In addition,since this site will be at the very edge of our network,we desire to build at a height of 195'so
that wa may extend the reach of our network as fnr as possible,and provide as ninny customers as possible
with quality T-Mobllc service.
T-Mobile desires to provide the best quality coverage without gaps and with sufficient capacity to serve the
Jefferson City community.
Please contact me If I can be of any funber assistance.
arl��l
• Rt Eagiaearinj M►an�ar
T•Mabila USA,St.Lois
sT
i
.tom . r .�-. .n :+•. 'v
Nu ~ or
Y f \
{
1.
L +•\ � � `M"M►�a
1 mail n \
r
Jr `
,i
�r �• '
.K
:. a •�,fit �_:.
• `�f, 'mow`' �:tv.
t
r
r
•
.:f
All
Act
r
Y tt' i Ij M F'
ll
-
ob � Y
I�
� r
r
111111' �'� � •
~�� X16 • •{ 9R` • •
���,,\►
r•�� 1 , y S
a 1
cu
co
CD
CD
+�� i
•tl33H�gN�
O �<
Il e X 99 lR t
�-
Ci' Rd
vrJX3 E
}q �I;
4
• <�, 6t @YgRpaX
w■ 6 Q ixMR�
c � cRi �
rnr �giiYgi
in yy !R
Qc0
r0� wZ� Rx n
"in �� ZJ0 1gBt4��
Z 0—
o> pIF �t YpRt°�X i�st6l; t, XB•y?7vv �a•i1�
OV=Aw� @ �� � t� Fl � 1Y€�1 ��� ep�+ o C
V �. c
J U 1 W M ®@s � g � EYYY �8��
■ O o�zz za 5 t FF �e r ��X �g m
1, 1111 1 PH Rol
(471 L1115 L--J1 10 lit
■ W, Ciro E � eXE RXXetY� � X° 6X ai X iX !@ g X i t
low■ 'I ~ O�Y Y � €�g����b 9 P��d i� p� qi RY Y� i a X"d
'X � 8
igBt��Bp 1��pB 8� � OqR fall 11 81, ifoil 11g11 it
B!1 @ I� ��� `9 X6
� �° III
J
•N Y '�� � � a 1 pR� n!
O 6v �B 'y All
•�� i � p e �• E�FEp� a� asp � `.s � "" h
E-N Al isLi ��� 1�
r
�g 1�1 is
Iprait 0 � {3B
»T_' �' �141iIl� SAS
Oft 111 till I
it
NL
QQ N ! �+j+jj ,11ijjff�fiji�y{ � g Mgr{
� a 1 !j j ;j !'�'i{ t:o> li6. at .Q ! , . Phi
Ill Mill I � r r � ; ► E 1 i E , { ,
�i , '
,
I { ii ill a !ll, !1l:{ I
��� �--I--�-------�--�*�'--T-- 1 ilia t1l "i w 1 �i'• i�C � a
all
It� rt �,,�� , �♦ � 3 ,�.I ii jri ; jt.,Eil; ,t t rr
• 1 it tll'!j 1P,1; t i'1 p 1 1�' 1;�81.p 11
CZ) w t � , t i 'r 1 Eil'3 �: r ,il, t !s, '1 liilijrit E 1
►! , r 1 E, 1 It ,� ,
fill li'j l+tp Er ,.li. t,til�,' , tail , ,11
Iii �It'l;ririlli;��'�S!' !j '4llititl�! :�
i}lL�iii�ii�:ilu�i
8{q{Iliiq
` * 33)W&
6y t Y jEN I Q p�Q 171
ddq pp
����k�P
•d yQy *
1�f , ' ~ +I .i�o-~ ms's• --�io�.�i� _ 3"e R
�•,lyi\ 1�«kiwi' �' r , . I a '• y ,
�� Y.{, D' 1 `. • .1..0.1� �',`
• --II ,'• -•i.l I Iw i; ;jI b Sp�R:,•' �It``�w' ''
Ql��-��� ', '1,� ''f . .b, ' `1', , i,,i • o, � 1 },� . 1¢R�,,,•�•' 1 9• �j
M1. •e�ll� �,�, a ;8 ,, .• I. 'S1 '
FN.a
la
1�1 it
$ �c Edit
MINI
so yN33NIpH�J
�� a e
0 &p �� � • '�` • � � � qi�Q F Q°Qf ��'�� k� � � N 1i
� s
V B
r �
*033NIg
O R (S II Qua 6� C pg g
R � n
kill
y.•.
i
a
E �
® {wMlw IYUMI t!n F VMl mbau N y
y 1
4
�.. .. ��
R � gg99
IR
Via
sit
X115
y '-alp
4• �E Q r � LB
va
A IL
yt It
��
a
a `♦
t yy j{
11 y 11 �� gay �5 l\ ��qN � w+ •�\ +
i
i
\
lb
`� t
as ��✓✓//'' .,
g�a: kids '1%
lit
v �5. �.
re
J 15 j
91 t
gg $yQ r
ti
z �6 IVA tiv r Yr Ga g r
as
1
It is \c r,�i
2006-FAA•34.OE
AIRSPACE®
Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77 Sub-Part C
Obstruction Analysis Report
T-Mobile
John Ott
2004 Westport Center Drive
St, Louis, MO 631463564
E-mail: john.ott @t-mobile.com
Phone: 3148123618 Fax:
Site Identification: M00B-706B
Nearest City: St. Martins, MO
Site Information (Coordinate Datum - NAD83)
Latitude: 3B° - 341 - 7.7" Decimal Degrees: 38.56880555555560
Longitude: 920 - 17' - 7.8" Decimal Degrees: 92.2855°
Ground Elevation: 820 feet AMSL
Structure Height: 199 feet AGL
• Overall Height: 1019 feet AMSL
FAA Number: Null
Airspace Study#: 2006-FAA-34.OE
Analyzed on: 4/18/2006. Using Alrspace®2006.3. Airspace®Data Date: 3/15/2006
This Airspace Analysis was completed under all obstacle evaluation rules specified In
Federal Aviation Regulations(FAR)Part 77 sub-Part C.
Approved,
Mary J Sanders, Aviation Specialist Clyde J Pittman, Aerospace Engineer
Federal Airways &Airspace
1423 S. Patrick Drive
Satellite Beach, FL 32937
(321) 777-1266
Date Printed:04.10.2006
• AIRSPACEO and TERPSO are registered 0 trademarks of Federal Airways d Alrspace®
Copyright 01069.2006 Federal Airways d Alrspace0
Page 7 of 4
2000•FAA•34.OE
• AIRSPACE®
Site ID Number: MOOB•706B
AERONAUTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
TERPS®analysis has been completed for the proposed site. No IFR impact was identified.
The proposed structure does not penetrate obstruction standards. An aeronautical analysis
by the Federal Aviation Admininstration would likely find no adverse aeronautical impact. An
extended study will not be required.The maximum not to exceed height to avoid an extended
study by the FAA is 1320 feet AMSL.
Marking and Lighting are not normally required for structures 200 feet or less. However, it may
become a requirement based upon the outcome of the aeronautical study conducted by the FAA.
It will then become part of the determination and a requirement of the determination.
No adverse Impact to low altitude federal airways are identified.
No impact to VFR Traffic Pattern Airspace.
No Potential FCC Licensed AM Broadcast Station interference Identified.
•
Dale Printed:04.10.2000
• AIRSPACE®and TERPS®are registered®trademarks of Federal Airways d Alrspace®
Copyright m 10110.2000 Federal Airways d Alrapace®
Page 2 of 4
2006-FAA-34.OE
• AIRSPACE®
Site ID Number: MOOB-7066
LANDING FACILITY INFORMATION
The nearest public use landing facility to the proposed location is:
JEFFERSON CITY MEM (Ident: JEF)
The distance to the nearest runway of this landing facility is 35633 feet or
6.7 statute Miles. The true bearing is 77.57° to this landing facility.
Private landing facilities are exempt from review by the FAA under FAR Part 77.
However, locating near a private landing facility may affect aircraft operations
during take-of and landing.
The nearest private landing facility is: MU64: CAPI
The proposed structure is located 24815 feet or 4.7 statute miles.
The true bearing to this landing facility is 102 degrees.
The proposed structure is not within 3 nautical miles (3.45 statute miles) of the private
landing facility. The likely hood of adverse Impact to aircraft operations at the private
facility is remote.
• FAA NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
Notice to the FAA is not required because the proposed structure
1)is less than 200 feet above ground level[FAR Part 77.13(x)(1)].
2)does not exceed runway slope criteria [FAR Part 77.13(x)(2).
3) is not a traverse way(road) [FAR 77.13(x)(3)],
4) is not located with an Instrument procedure area [FAR 77.13(a)(4)].
5) is not located on airport property[FAR 77.13(a)(5)].
Dale Printed:04.18.2006
•
AIRSPACES and TERPSO are registered®trademarks of Federal Airways d Airspacem
Copydght O 1089.2006 Federal Airways d Airspace®
Page 3 014
M-FAA-34.0E
• AIRSPACE®
Site ID Number: MODS-706B
AERONAUTICAL IMPACT
FAR Part 77 Subpart-C Obstruction Standards
The proposed structure would not violate or exceed obstruction standards
as defined by FAR Part 77.23(a)(1), 77.23(a)(2) and 77.25.
Terminal Instrument Procedure Standards- FAR Part 77,23(a)(31
No adverse impact with a US Terminal Approach or Departure Procedure has been identified.
Minimum Obstacle Clearance Altitude (MOCA) - FAR Part 77.23(a)(41
The proposed structure is not located within a low altitude airway area and will not impact
aircraft using any airway.
VFR Traffic Pattern Airspace
The proposed structure is not located within a VFR Traffic Pattern Airspace or is below the
allowable height. It will not impact aircraft circling to land.
• FCC Licensed AM Broadcast Station Proof-of-Performance
The proposed structure is not located within the specified range of an FCC Licensed AM
radio and will not require Proof-of-Performance analysis.
Dale Printed:04.19.2008
•
AIRSPACES and TERPS®are registered®trademarks or Federal Airways&Airspace®
copyright 01989.2008 Federal Airways&Airspace®
Page 4 of 4
X04
111 't
City of Jefferson ? E'F r f John Landwehr
Mayor
Department of Community Development Patrick E.Sullivan, P.E.; Director
320 East McCarty Street _. Phone: (573) 634-6410
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 i f Fax: (573) 634-6457
September 7, 2006
Cole County Public Water Supply District No. 1
4346 Rainbow Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Mary Kreps, Representative
Riley & Associates
745 Craig Road, #106
St. Louis, MO 63141
Tysen Weishaar
Selective Site Consultants, Inc.
1816 Lackland Hill Parkway, Suite 400
St, Louis, MO 63146
RE: Case No. P06034
4935 Old Lohman Road
Amendment to Final PUD Plan for a 195 foot telecommunications tower
•The Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet in the Council Chambers of the John G.
Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, at 5:15 p,m, on Thursday, September 14, 2006.
Enclosed is a copy of the agenda, the notice sent adjacent property owners and the Planning Division
staff report.
Please be advised that the property owner, the consultant and/or the legal representative must be In
attendance to answer all questions that may arise during discussion of your request.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at 573.634.6475.
/—DEPARTM/EENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Eric Barron, AICP
Senior Planner
ersonl�jm, eff
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Y 1 IU IU
C% A Or ! fie,
City of Jefferson ? 8'': f John Landwehr
• — L Mayor
Department of Community Development Patrick E.Sullivan,P.E.:Director
320 East McCarty Street Phone: (573)634-6410
Jefferson City,Missouri 65101 •� 2 Fax: (S73)634-6457
September 7, 2006
Dear Property Owner:
This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15
p.m. on Thursday, September 14, 2006 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal
Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider the following matter(see map on back):
Case No. P06034 — 4935 Old Lohman Rd; PUD Plan. Request filed by Cole County
Public Water Supply District No. 1, Ruth Winters, Board Clerk, property owner, on behalf
of T-Mobile c/o Riley & Associates, Mary Kreps, representative, for approval of a PUD
Plan to allow the construction of a 195' telecommunications tower. The 2.0 acre parcel
Is located approximately 300 feet west of the intersection of Old Lohman Road and
Leandra Lane, and consists of part of the west half of the Northeast Quarter of Section
16, Township 44, Range 12, Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri.
As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you have the privilege of attending this hearing. Unfortunately,
we are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed
to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways:
e-mail:jcplanning @jeffcitymo.org
• fax: Dept. of Community Development /Planning Division 573-634-6457
mail: Dept. of Community Development/ Planning Division
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the
official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to
provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission
Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. will be included in the official
record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members.
For your Information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing In front of the City Council
on October 16, 2006. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G.
Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact us at 573.634.6475.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6_1zcG 4:7,�
Eric Barron, AICP
Senior Planner
• Cftq rsongVQ
it
ie
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT uid';• q, :: : ;i,,.• • c: , ,,,,,
Jefferson City Planning& Zoning Commission
Properly Owners List
Case No. P0634 4935 Old Lohman Road September 14, 2006
• Central )electric Power Co-Op Lawrence& Margaret Thocnen
c/o Joyce Linhardt 1119 Big Hom Drive
PO Box 269 Jefferson City, MO 65109
Jefferson City, MO 65102 Lohman Road
4931 Old Lohman Road
Cornerstone Baptist Church of Jefferson
City
4930 Old Lohman Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
4930 Old Lohman Road
Jordan Family Trust
2052 Honeysuckle Lane
Jefferson City, MO 65109
5000 Old Lohman Road
Howard & Virginia Miller
5012 Old Lohman Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
5012 Old Lohman Road
• Modine Manufacturing Company
1500 Dekoven Avenue
Racine, WI 53401
1502 S. Country Club Drive
Public Water Supply District#I
4346 Rainbow Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Old Lohman Road
Martin & Mary Riegel
RR 1 Box 80
Loose Creek, MO 65054
4936 Old Lohman Road
Norbert &Phyllis Stmemph
5008 Old Lohman Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
5008 Old Lohman Road
•
• PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Case No. P06034
September 14, 2006
Sender Senders How Date
Address Received Received
Phyllis & Norbert Struem h 5008 Old Lohman Road Mail 9/14/2006
Jean Miller 5012 Old Lohman Road Mail 9/13/2006
•
RECEIVED
SEP ► Q 29
aml
v-
a
•
Jean Miller �FCF/LF
5012 Old Lohman Rd. O
Jefferson City, MO. 65109 Sip 3
August 11,2006
N��y�F F�roF
Patrick F. Sullivan
Dept. of Community Development
320 East McCarty Street
Jefferson City,M0.65101
I am writing you again to let you know how concerned 1 am about this tower being built
across from my property and my neighbors property also all the residents in Westview
Heights.
Case NO. P06034. I am highly against the building of this tower. These towers are a
hazard to our health,they lower properly value, TV and telephone reception. Do you
• people value our concerns and values?
I thank you for hearing me and all the people I am concerned about.
I do hope this case is put to rest. No Towerl
Sincerely,
can Miller
I
•
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONiNG COMMISSION
September 14, 2006
Case No. P06034—4935 Old Lohman Rd; PUD Plan (address assigned to the proposed tower is 4933
Old Lohman Rd). Request filed by Ruth Winters,Board Clerk,Cole County Public Water Supply District
No. ),property owner,on behalf of T-Mobile c%Riley&Associates,Mary Kreps,representative, for approval
of a PUD Plan to allow the construction of a 195' telecommunications tower. The 2.0 acre parcel is located
approximately 300'west ofthe intersection of Old Lohman Road and Lcandm Lane,and consists of pan of the
west half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 44, Range 12, Jefferson City, Cole County,
Missouri.
Notification
By publication in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent and affected property owners within 185 feel, and by
posting a sign on the property.
Nature of Request
The applicant requests approval of a Preliminary and Final PUD Site Plan to allow the construction of 195'
telecommunications tower and accompanying equipment shelters.
location
The 2.0 acre parcel owned by PWSD No. I is located approximately 300' west of the intersection of Old
Lohman Road and Leandra Lane. The proposed monopole and equipment cabinet will be located 434 feet
south of the Old Lohman Rd right-of-way, inside a leased area consisting ofa 50' X 70'parcel(3,500 sq ft),
immediately east of the existing water tower compound.
• Surroundine Zonine& Land Use
Zonin ,and land uses adioining the subject pr0o erty are provided in the followin table:
Direction I Zoninn I Land Use
North N/A outside city limits Single and multi-famil dwellings
South PUD Undeveloped industrial land
East PUD Electrical substalion/Undevelo ed industrial land
West PUD Undeveloped industrial land
Access/Traffic
The site will obtain access from Old Lohman Road via an existing private gravel drive. A 20' wide access
casement will accommodate a 102' long 12' wide extension to the existing drive to access the tower
compound.
Location.
The proposed location on the site of a political subdivision such as Public Water Supply District No. I is
encouraged by the City's telecommunication ordinance,
Staff Analysis
Design and Anneamnce. New lowers are required to be monopoles with galvanized steel finish, or to be
painted a neutral color. Towers,antennas and equipment shelters should be sited and designed to maximally
reduce visual degradation and blend into the character of the neighborhood.
• Tower licieht. The proposed tower will be a 195' monopole. The applicant is required to demonstrate the
proposed tower ))eight in excess of 150 feet is necessary for the proper functioning of the system. An
Engineer's Statement was provided(attached)that addresses this item.
Planning and Zoning Commission September 14, 2006
Case No. P06034 Page 2
• Co-location. New towers over 70 feet must have the capacity to accommodate one additional carrier or
provider. The applicant states in its narrative that file new tower and lease area will provide collocation for
multiple additional carriers'antennas and related equipment and the site plan depicts antemine and equipment
shelters for additional carriers.
Setbacks. New towers are required to set back from all property lines at least 50%ofthe tower height unless
designed far co-location. As a single carrier monopole of 195 feet, the proposed tower would be required to
set back a distance of at least 97'-0 from all property lines. The proposed tower will set back 434'-6" from
the north property line(Old Lohman Rd),39'-9" from the cast properly line, 109'-9"from the west property
line, and 100'-9" from the south property line.
Buffering. Towers designed for co-location are required to be buffered from nearby residential dwellings and
vacant residentially zoned land by a distance of at least the height of the tower. In Ibis case, the proposed
tower would be located at least 434'-6', over twice ilia height of the tower, from any existing dwellings or
vacant residentially zoned land.
Use of Existing Towers. There are no existing cellular towers within 1,500' of the proposed tower.
Separation. New monopole towers 75 feet in height or greater are required to be separated from existing
towers by 1,500 feel or more. There are no existing lowers within 1,500' of the proposed tower.
Fencing. The site plan indicates a fence around Ilia facility compound,the proposed fence will be galvanized
chain link, 8 feet in height,topped with 3 strands of barbed wire.
Safety Standards, An Airspace Obstruction Analysis Report has been submitted. Structural integrity of the
structure may be certified by the engineer's signature and seal on the site plan and upon other plans provided.
Equipment Shelter(s). Multiple equipment shelters will be located on the site.
Parking.
Two parking spaces must be provided within 100' of the tower and on the Sallie parcel. The proposed
extension would include a 12' wide 36' long spur that could accommodate one parking space or be used as a
vehicle turnaround. One additional parking space is required within 100' of the tower. The parking area for
the existing water tower could accommodate this requirement.
Staff Recommendation
The substantive requirements of the City's telecommunications ordinance have been met. The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall consider the information presented bythe applicant and detennine if approval of the
cell lower would conflict with the purposes of this Section, would create a blight on adjacent property, or
would interfere with adjacent uses,
If approved, staff recommends the following conditions:
I. Overall height not to exceed 195 feet;
2. Provide certifications as required by the building regulations division;
3. Compliance with Engineering Division recommendations and corrections to the site plan.
•