HomeMy Public PortalAboutAgendas - Apr. 05, 2011Agenda
Beaumont City Council
Beaumont Redevelopment Agency
Beaumont Financing Authority
Beaumont Utility Authority
Beaumont Charitable Foundation
Beaumont Conservation Authority
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California
Regular Session (6:00 p.m.)
Closed Session (after Regular Session)
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
"Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet
are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at 550 E. 6th Street during normal business hours"
REGULAR SESSION
Regular Session to begin at 6:00 p.m. Place: Civic Center, Room 5
Roll Call: Mayor De Forge_, Mayor Pro Tern Berg , Council Member
Castaldo , Council Member Fox , Council Member Gall
Invocation: Father Joseph — Blessed Katari
Pledge of Allegiance: Girl Scouts
Presentation: Recognition - Anita Worthen, Women of the Year
Proclamation — Children and Kids Cancer Connection
Adjustments to Agenda:
ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Anyone wishing to address the City Council on any matter not on the agenda
of this meeting may do so now. The oral communications portion of the agenda is to hear public comments. Anyone wishing to
speak on an item on the agenda may do so at the time the Council considers that item. All person(s) wishing to speak must fill
out a "Request to Speak Form" and give it to the City Clerk at the beginning of the meeting. The forms are available on the table
at the back of the room. There is a three (3) minute limit on public comments. There will be no sharing or passing of time to
another person.
1. COUNCIL REPORTS
(This is the portion of the agenda where the City Council will present updates on city actions taken,
committee assignments, and training and travel)
a)
Mayor De Forge
b)
Mayor Pro Tern Berg
C)
Council Member Castaldo
d)
Council Member Fox
e)
Council Member Gall
2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS
(City of Beaumont Core Values: Treat everyone right; Keep a customer service focus; Effective communication; Present
opportunity; Operate like a great business; Eliminate bureaucratic solutions; Embrace positive change)
a. Beaumont Charitable Foundation (made up of donations from citizens, employees and contractors)
1) "Boys in Blue" MDA Event Update ($1,500 raised)
b. Community Information and Local Project Update
1) Financial Updates
2) Beaumont Redevelopment Agency
3) Sustainability
a) Summer Concerts in the Park
b) Economic Stimulus Update
C) Animal Care Low Cost Shot Clinic Update
d) Request Partner Update
e) Southern California Edison Gold Level Achievement
f) Redlands Bike Classic — Beaumont Circuit Update
4) Public Works Update
1) Median Markings
2) Brookside Avenue improved adjacent to the Sports Park
3) Cherry Valley Blvd and 1 -10 Interchange improvements
4) 1 -10 and Oak Valley Parkway Stop Sign Update
C. Calendar of Events
1) April 1, 2011 — Redland Bike Classic — Beaumont Circuit
2) April 6, 2011 — Beaumont Cares Awareness Team Meeting
3) April 7, 2011 —World Health Day
4) April 8, 2011 — Chamber of Commerce Good Morning Beaumont Breakfast
5) April 9, 2011 — Mardi Gras Event (MDA Fundraiser)
6) April 9, 2011 — Law Enforcement Torch Run
7) April 12, 2011 — Beaumont Planning Commission Meeting
8) April 16 & 17, 2011 — Baker to Vegas (MDA Police Run)
9) April 16, 2011 — BCVPR Fishing Derby at the BCVW District Ponds
10) April 21, 2011 — Volunteer Celebration —11 am to 1 pm Beaumont CRC
11) April 30, 2011 — BCVPR District — Home Run Derby (MDA Fundraiser)
12) May 5, 2011 — Charity Basketball Tournament (MDA Fundraiser)
13) May 14th & 15th, 2011 — Relay For Life — Sports Park
14) May 18, 2011 — "Run for the Wall"
15) May 21, 2011 — Miss Beaumont Queens Pageant
16) May 28, 2011 — Breezin' Through Beaumont/Cherry Festival Car Show
17) May 30, 2011 — Memorial Day Ceremony — Beaumont Civic Center 11 am
18) June 2, 3, 4 & 5, 2011 — Cherry Festival
19) June 10, 2011 — Beaumont Municipal Pool opens for the summer
20) July 4, 2011 — Independence Day Celebration
21) 1St Wednesday of each Month — Beaumont Care Awareness Team
22) Second and Third Wednesday of Each Month — Story Time Cafe
d. Rumor Control, and Report on Oral and Written Communications
1) Candidates Packet Supplied since 1995 — To be updated at the April 19, 2011
meeting
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
(This portion of the Agenda is for items that do not require a Public Hearing or discussion.)
a. Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only and publish by summary
b. Approval of the Minutes of the City Council Meeting March 15, 2011
C. Approval of the Warrant List for April 5, 201.
d. Approval of the purchase and installation of a safety guard rail on Elm Avenue North of
California Avenue
e. Approval of Change Order for Street Repair Work at Oak Valley Parkway and Interstate
10.
f. Award of Agreement and Task Order for Erosion Control repair on Oak Valley Parkway.
g. Adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -07 — A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont Pertaining to Any Consideration for the Pass and Redistricting
Recommendation: Approval of the Consent Calendar as presented.
4. ACTION ITEMS /PUBLIC HEARING /REQUESTS
(This portion of the Agenda is for items that require a Public Hearing, discussion, and /or Council direction.)
a. Ordinance No. 994 — An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont, California Adding Section 8.12.023 of the Municipal Code RE:
"Unauthorized Disposal — Prohibited"
Recommendation: Hold a Public Hearing and approve the 1St reading of Ordinance No.
994 as presented.
b. Ordinance No. 995 — An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont, California Amending Section 1.16.030 of Chapter 1.16 of the
Beaumont Municipal Code Entitled "Violation- Infraction - Penalty"
Recommendation: Hold a Public Hearing and approve the 1St reading of Ordinance No.
995 as presented.
C. Street Vacation 10 -SV -01 — a request for the vacation of a portion of Edgar
Avenue (located between Interstate 10 and Fifth Street) and Magnolia
Avenue (located between Interstate 10 and Fourth Street). Applicant: City of
Beaumont and Harvey Marcell
Recommendation: Hold a Public hearing and Approve Street Vacation 10- SV -01.
d. City's Facade Improvement Program - Site Improvements at the Lil
Luau /Celebrity Carpets Commercial Center located at 385 E. 6th Street.
Applicant: Randy Reynolds
Recommendation: City Council provide direction to staff relative to the applicant's
request.
e. SCAG Annual Conference
Recommendation: Appoint one (1) full conference Council Member to attend the
conference
5. WORKSHOP
a. Budget
1) Decision Packages
a) Review
b) Prioritize
Adjournment of the City Council Meeting at p.m.
Any Person with a disability who requires accommodations in order to participate in this meeting should
telephone Shelby Hanvey at 951 - 769 -8520 ext. 323, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting in order to
make a request for a disability- related modification or accommodation
I
- CITY OF BEAUMONT -
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Fund for Children and Kids Cancer Connection
report cancer is the leading cause of death by disease among children in the United States.
This tragic disease is detected in nearly 15,000 of our nation's young people each and every
year; and
WHEREAS, founded nearly twenty years ago by Steven A. F. Firestein, a member of
the philanthropic Max Factor family, the American Cancer Fund for Children, Inc. and sister
organization, Kids Cancer Connection, Inc. are dedicated to helping these children and their
families; and
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Fund for Children and Kids Cancer Connection
provide a variety of vital patient psychosocial services to children undergoing cancer
treatment at Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Rady Children's Hospital in San
Diego, as well as participating hospitals throughout the country, thereby enhancing the
quality of life for these children and their families; and
WHEREAS, through its uniquely sensitive and comforting Magical Caps for Kids
program, the American Cancer Fund for Children and Kids Cancer Connection distributes
thousands of beautifully handmade caps and decorated baseball caps to children who want to
protect their heads following the trauma of chemotherapy, surgery and /or radiation
treatments; and
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Fund for Children and Kids Cancer Connection
also sponsor nationwide Courageous Kid recognition award ceremonies and hospital
celebrations in honor of a child's determination and bravery to fight the battle against
childhood cancer.
Now, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Brian DeForge, on behalf of the City Council and the
entire City of Beaumont, do hereby recognizing "Childhood Cancer Awareness Week" in
Beaumont during the week of April 10 -16, 2011.
Mayor Brian DeForge
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Agenda Item No. J . 1'
STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Economic Developmen&Ll
Date: April 5, 2011
Subject: Redevelopment Agency Update
Background:
The City of Beaumont Redevelopment Agency was formed in 1993, and since that date has spent
over $30.5 Million dollars on RDA projects. The City has future RDA projects with estimated costs
totaling over $36 million.
These future projects are to be funded using tax increment funding from the Beaumont
Redevelopment Agency Project Area. Based on the recent State of California Governor's proposal to
permanently abolish California's more than 400 local redevelopment agencies; Staff feels it is critical
to inform the City Council that these future projects and their estimated completion dates will be
negatively affected if Local RDAs are eliminated.
Analysis:
Staff has reviewed and analyzed the Governor's Proposal and the two reform Bills currently being
circulated in Sacramento.
Elimination Proposal - Gov Browns Proposal to Eliminate RDA's Statewide
Reform Proposal #1 — California Redevelopment Agency
Reform Proposal #2 — City of Long Beach
Attached for your review are the three Proposals with executive summaries.
Respectfully submitted;
CITY OF BEAUMONT
—ems
arsinski
Community Development Analyst
G L�
Governor Browns Proposal to Eliminate RDA's
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
• Would Eliminate over 400 local RDA's Statewide,
• Create 7 member Oversight Board ( members chosen from local agencies)
• Creates successor entity rules, reporting requirements, forced sale of RDA assets by oversight board
• Up 10% RDA (after pass throughs) = 10 year extension ( 1 year extension per 1 % Sent; up to 10 %, 10 yrs)
ANALYSIS:
• $1.7 billion to State ($600 Million to Medi -cal, $600 Million to Court's New Computer System = 1.2
Billion)
• Remainder is promised to School Districts the following fiscal year
• Another State Raid of Local Funds to balance the budget
• If approved, Lawsuit will be filed (Prop 22, and Article 16 of State Constitution)
Proposed Legislation to Address Governor's Proposal to Disestablish Redevelopment Age... Page 1 of 4
Homo CaP3i 1 6 :a Contact Us S Go
I
rneyers I nave
Read Our Publications i Client A!e is
R t ,Ti'FD Pi 'I rat_;R
}r y T # °
r ,
.5:�2�.L4 i�.. a) ���� . ;.�..�_,�.,�a�.ti�ir).L:'4.� t��,�- C�i�:tl`�.;,��,
.�.,i. k�.L.� iJ �. C ii . � i 'i,.! . #. +' £ 3.s 4a 1 i � i..i is) .�4 s t - F1 ! i c 1,�.
Redevelopment, Heal Estate arid a
Affordable Housing ; y,�� a. ..^^�� r� {{�. / ` ,.g..� .- c�
1..ke -d.e v eio�'' l.1ie.il i_ .t"' ``F t'... >.e. a.
................ ................ ._.._..._... _. _._. ... ._... ....__.._....
.. .................................. .......... ............ ............................ ....
I.ate in the afternoon on Wednesday, February 23rd, the State Department of Finance released
Ruben Duran
lalrl;;uage for a proposed budget trailer bill that addresses the Governor's proposal to
Susan Bloch
disestablish redevelopment agencies. The 26 -page bill has not pet been formally introduced,
but Inlay be introduced and considered by%the Budget Conference. Committee within the next
few days. It is likely that the bill will undergo modification prior to consideration by the
legislature, and if adopted, the bill maybe subject to legal challenge.
'fhe proposed legislation states that it is an urgency measure; that would take immediate effect
upon approval by the legislature and signature by the Governor. Although urgency legislation
normally requires approval by two - thirds of both the Senate and.4°ssennbly, it is possible that
the legislation may be included as part of the budget package and become effectise with
majority approval and the Governor's signature.
Summary of the proposed legislation:
r. Dissolves all redevelopment agencies as 0f July 1, 2011.
a. }affective a, of the date of adoption of the legislation, imposes far - reaching limitations
on agency actions prior to dissolution, including prohibitions on the establishment of
new debt, the execution of new contracts, the amendment of existing agreements, the
disposition of assets including the sale of property, and the adoption or amendment of
redevelopment plans.
j. Provides that the successor to each dissolved redevelopment agency would be the entity
that created the agency (with specified modifications for joint powers agencies).
Q.. Permits successor entitles to assume responsibility, for housing Obligations and use the
agency'slow/ mod housing set -aside fund balance for such pul1)oses. (If a successor
entity chooses not to assume these responsibilities, the fields would be transferred to a
local housing authority or, to the :State Department of Mousing_ and Community
Development if there is no local housing authority).
5. Provides that challenges to the validity of agency bonds or to agency alld legislative
body determinations and findings issued or adopted after danuan- r. 2011 maybe
brought within three years following approval of the action (extending the 60- and go-
day- periods prodded under current law).
6. Provides for est6blishment of a seven - member oversight board for each successor entity
that would consist of representatives appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, the
City Council, the County Superintendent of Education and the largest non - enterprise
special district operating Within the jurisdiction.
. On a semi - annual basis, requires each successor entity to prepare, a "Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule" that sets forth a schedule of payment obligations,
including the date, amount, and source of finds for each payment.
8. Requires the payment schedule to Ile certified, by nn extennal auditor, approved by the
�(
oversight board, and submitted to the county auditor- controller, the State Controller's
a�Ot V/
Office and the Department of Finance.
1' j
q. Requires the successor entity to make payinents for "enforceable obligations" defined
0
to include: (a) bonds, (n) loans b% the agency for a lawful ut osc
by federal
�V� jy�t «�
payments required the goeernment, (d) pre - existing obligations to the _state,
10,
(e) obligations imposed by state law, (f) iegalL enforceable payments to agency
hww
employees, including pension and unemployment payments, (g) judgments and
n
h J
settlements entered into by a court or arbitration proceeding, prmided however,
Successor entities and oversight boards have authority to al)peal,judgulents settlCUlCilts
and arbitration decisions, (h) legally binding agreements "that are not otherwise void ,
violating the debt limit or public policy'', and (i) contracts necessary for administration
cf the agency'to the extent permitted (e.g.. leases. insurance, equipment rentals).
Proposed Legislation to Address Governor's Proposal to Disestablish Redevelopment Age... Page 2 of 4
ittpve
C Jul
QtW `
16. On it semi- annual basis, requires successor entities to prepare. for oversight board
approval, a proposed administrative budget that includes estimated administrative
costs, proposed sources of payment, and proposals for services to be provided, but
which excludes costs for staff activities associated with "retained development
projects' (defined above).
IT Limits tilt: annual amount payable for the administrative budget from tax increment to
the greater 00 4250,000 or 5% of property tax allocated to the successor entity for the
2011 -12 fiscal year (declining to 3% for each fiscal year thereafter), reduced by the
amount that can be paid from bond proceeds or other sources.
18. Permits successor entities to employ staff and officers of the dissolved ageneti provided
that their total compensation does not exceed the amount paid in calendar year 2010
unless approved by the oversight board.
X3. Provides that prior oversight board approval is required for: (a) the establishment of
repayment terms for outstanding loans where such terms have not been established
prior to July 1.2ou; (b) tare issuance of refunding. bonds by the successor entity
(provided, however, the successor entityy is authorized to refund bonds tinder certain
circumstances), (c) the setaside of reserves as required by bond indentures; (d) the
merger of project areas, (e) the acceptance of federal or state grants that are conditioned
upon the provision of matching funds in an amount greater than 5 %: W approval to
have projects deemed to be *'retained development projects" (defined above); and (g)
the establishment of tile Recognized Obligation Paytrtent Schedule (described above).
20. Requires the oversight board to direct the suceessor entity to: (a) dispose of all assets
and properties except those deemed to be part of "approved development
projects" (defined above) with such disposition to be done expeditiously and in a
manner aimed at maximizing value; (b) cease performance in connection with and
terminate all existing agreements that do not qualify as "enforceable
obligations" (defined above); (c) transfer housing obligations and low /mod setaside
fluids to the applicable entity (the successor entity if it so elects); and (d) negotiate
compensation agreements with taxing entities for retained development projects
(defined above).
21. Requires the county auditor - controller to complete a financial audit of each
redevelopment agency in the county by October 1, 2011 in order to establish cacti
agent, s assets, liabilities, passthrough payment obligations, and the amount and terms
of indebtedness, and to certify the initial Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. The
audits are to be submitted to the State Controller by October 15, 2011.
22. Requires the county auditor - controller to determine the amount of property tax
increment that would have been allocated to cacti redevelopment agency and to deposit
that amount in a Redevelopment Property Talc Trust Fund ( "Property Tax Fluid'), The
county auditor- controller is charged with administering the Property Tax Fund for the
benefit of holders of agency debt, the faxing entities that receive passthrough payments,
and the beneficiaries of the Public Health ,and Safety Fund (defined below).
23. Requires the county auditor- controller to allocate funds from the Property Tax Fund
first, to local agencies, school districts and connnunit• college districts in the amount
10. Permits the successor entity to make payments for enforceable obligatiuns usulg tax
increment funds oniy w hen no outer funding source is available or %hen payment from
current property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.
ii. Requires the successor entity to remit unencumbered agency funds to the county-
auditor- controller for distribution to taxing entities.
12. Requires the successor entity to dispose of agency assets as directed by the oversight
board with proceeds to be transferred to the county auditor - controller for distribution
to taxing entities.
13. Authorizes successor entities to complete: "approved development proiec•ts" which are
defined to rnean projects where construction site remediation, environmental
�Y1T,
assessment, or property acquisition is required pursuant to an enforceable obligation
C.
between flue agency and parties other than the entity that created the redevelopment
(i f of
tj
age.ncl•, and either (t) substantial performance tinder the agreement had taken .place
��yP
prior to.7uiy f, 2otr, or (2) tile oversight board determines that it would be beneficial
for the taxing entities or the communities to continue the project even if there has not
been substantial performance.
14. Authorizes successor entities to carry out "retained development projects (defined to
N Qa
mean projects planned by the agency prior to dissolution that the successor entity
wishes t0 continue to develop using its own fund, but which the oversight board would
otherwise direct the successor entity to terminate because does
�(
the proiect not qualify
as an "approved development project."
15. Requires the successor entity to compensate the taxing entities for the value of property
and assets retained by the successor entity in an amount proportional to the taxing
entities' shares of property tax. Provides that the value of retained assets will be
established as the fair market value established by the count,,, assessor for the 201.1
property tax lien date if no other agreement w; to valuation is reached.
ittpve
C Jul
QtW `
16. On it semi- annual basis, requires successor entities to prepare. for oversight board
approval, a proposed administrative budget that includes estimated administrative
costs, proposed sources of payment, and proposals for services to be provided, but
which excludes costs for staff activities associated with "retained development
projects' (defined above).
IT Limits tilt: annual amount payable for the administrative budget from tax increment to
the greater 00 4250,000 or 5% of property tax allocated to the successor entity for the
2011 -12 fiscal year (declining to 3% for each fiscal year thereafter), reduced by the
amount that can be paid from bond proceeds or other sources.
18. Permits successor entities to employ staff and officers of the dissolved ageneti provided
that their total compensation does not exceed the amount paid in calendar year 2010
unless approved by the oversight board.
X3. Provides that prior oversight board approval is required for: (a) the establishment of
repayment terms for outstanding loans where such terms have not been established
prior to July 1.2ou; (b) tare issuance of refunding. bonds by the successor entity
(provided, however, the successor entityy is authorized to refund bonds tinder certain
circumstances), (c) the setaside of reserves as required by bond indentures; (d) the
merger of project areas, (e) the acceptance of federal or state grants that are conditioned
upon the provision of matching funds in an amount greater than 5 %: W approval to
have projects deemed to be *'retained development projects" (defined above); and (g)
the establishment of tile Recognized Obligation Paytrtent Schedule (described above).
20. Requires the oversight board to direct the suceessor entity to: (a) dispose of all assets
and properties except those deemed to be part of "approved development
projects" (defined above) with such disposition to be done expeditiously and in a
manner aimed at maximizing value; (b) cease performance in connection with and
terminate all existing agreements that do not qualify as "enforceable
obligations" (defined above); (c) transfer housing obligations and low /mod setaside
fluids to the applicable entity (the successor entity if it so elects); and (d) negotiate
compensation agreements with taxing entities for retained development projects
(defined above).
21. Requires the county auditor - controller to complete a financial audit of each
redevelopment agency in the county by October 1, 2011 in order to establish cacti
agent, s assets, liabilities, passthrough payment obligations, and the amount and terms
of indebtedness, and to certify the initial Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. The
audits are to be submitted to the State Controller by October 15, 2011.
22. Requires the county auditor - controller to determine the amount of property tax
increment that would have been allocated to cacti redevelopment agency and to deposit
that amount in a Redevelopment Property Talc Trust Fund ( "Property Tax Fluid'), The
county auditor- controller is charged with administering the Property Tax Fund for the
benefit of holders of agency debt, the faxing entities that receive passthrough payments,
and the beneficiaries of the Public Health ,and Safety Fund (defined below).
23. Requires the county auditor- controller to allocate funds from the Property Tax Fund
first, to local agencies, school districts and connnunit• college districts in the amount
Proposed Legislation to Address Governor's Proposal to Disestablish Redevelopment Age... Page 3 of 4
that would have been received by such entities as their slrare oft] ic property tat base
and that lrould have been paid pursuant to statutory and contractual passthrough
agreenlcnts. second (dil ire Fisc.11 Year 2ntt -r2 only) t o t he Public Health and Safety
Fund an amount riot to exceed ;t.? billion dollars on an a _regate bads statewide. third
to successor entities for payments listed in the Recognized Obligation Pa vnent
Schedule, and fourth to the successor entity appro-,ed adnrinistrative costs required to
be paid front former tax increment revenue, with any balance payable to cities, the
county, schools, community college districts, and non- enterprise special districts. The
State Director of Finance v.ill determine the amount to be allocated to the Public Health
and Safety Fund by each agency after needs for enforceable obligations are taken into
account. The Public Health and Safety Fund shall be used to reimburse the State for
the cost of providing healthcare and trial court services in the county.
24, Requires the California Law Revision Commission to draft a Community
Redevelopment Law cleanup bill for consideration by the legislature by January, r, 2013.
RLeyers Nave's Redevelopment Practice Group ccnttiuues to morrftor legislative developurents
and is working with cities and redevelopment agencies throughout the state to craft responses
to the. legislation.
3.,;C3T1tact
Ruben Duran Susan Bloch
Principal Principal
E -mail E-mail
213.626.2906 510.808.2000
Ruben Duran brings to the firm Susan Bloch is chair of the
significant experience counseling Redevelopment, Real Estate and
public ent;ties on a range of Affordable Hosuing Group. She
municipal law and
specializes in redevelopment and
redeveloprnen law issues. He
ie3 estate matters representing
has advised elected officials,
public agencies and private and
cities and redevelopment
non - profit developers in
agencies on matters pertaining to
transactions involving the
redevelopment, land use,
acquisition, development,
California Environmental Quality
financing, leasing and sale of
Act (CECIA) compliance,
residential, commercial and
affordable housing,
industrial properties; the
environmental law, the Brown
development and implementation
Act, the Public Records Act,
of affordable housing policies
elections, tort liability, gaming
and programs; and the adoption,
and conflicts of interest.
amendment and implementation
of redevelopment plans.
aTi?E(3
i't ^.,rte
G'aP:si
1' "IL�CtIa
C O';,-G� Lis
Search
Atr. ¢.,ay t ?dvcni,inu.
. C:n.:_uil.: . ^.p not
OOi"9;1e ^.
C it amt
_';!fmala Ck nma and c ie:.n Ir:iiiaiiVQS
VIE 1•SL40
Ci: >15 Management: Priol,'c Polley, t_lifts
iJUr il<!1165
aitC? hlvoe Igatiorls
,ivinq Hac,.
`:in9i!? D„_.<Irt an'! llwc :::e
on(forlinatioin
,nn! }lit 3C_,t'i1F;11t�
=nvirc �ntenial I_sr:
-aooi c.nd Employman:
Join Us
-nd U2,
.Gi ll��iCeE
_
L titiat10t
Nliunic, ial and ppcihl Jistict5
Oil, ca: - an-,j Ene;ny t ov!
Puul c Contracts and Cons,rrction
its =l_L
Pui;lir, s'it anre
At:r,!r!ays
Public Po,:•r, and 7c".ecornitwriicaiions
rim;nislratinln
Rv ;;v !Opol' rtt, deal tstale ar[i
Affordnab:v Housirt,,f
rhSeoetarir.,
Su :.:ort 12.11
i ransiior ?a:i;rl .;rid Isaias {s ruc.;'e
t grits aril F.Pi:aais
aTi?E(3
i't ^.,rte
G'aP:si
1' "IL�CtIa
C O';,-G� Lis
Search
Atr. ¢.,ay t ?dvcni,inu.
. C:n.:_uil.: . ^.p not
OOi"9;1e ^.
C it amt
RESPONSE TO GOVERNOR'S REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
• Proposition 22 prevents redevelopment agency funds from being redirected even if redevelopment
agencies are eliminated altogether. California Constitution, art. XVI, § 16 requires that
redevelopment funds be paid to redevelopment agencies.
1. Both the Attorney General's title and summary and the Legislative Analyst's analysis of Proposition
22 make it abundantly clear that redevelopment funding cannot be redirected regardless of whether
redevelopment agencies are eliminated.
a. The Attorney General's title and summary for Proposition 22 stated:
PROHIBITS THE STATE FROM BORROWING OR TAKING FUNDS USED FOR
TRANSPORTATION, REDEVELOPMENT, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROJECTS AND
SERVICES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits State, even during
severe fiscal hardship, from delaying distribution of tax revenues for these purposes. Fiscal Impact:
Decreased state General Fund spending and/or increased state revenues, probably in the range of $1
billion to several billions of dollars annually. Comparable increases in funding for state and local
transportation programs and local redevelopment. (Ballot Pamp., Gen. Elec. (Nov. 2010) title &
summary for Prop. 22, p. 30. Italics and underscoring added.)
b. The Legislative Analyst's analysis of Proposition 22 stated:
PROPOSAL
As Figure 1 summarizes, this measure reduces or eliminates the state's authority to:
• Use state fuel tax revenues to pay debt service on state transportation bonds.
• Borrow or change the distribution of state fuel tax revenues.
• Redirect redevelopment agency property taxes to any other local government.
• Temporarily shift property taxes from cities, counties, and special districts to schools.
• Use vehicle license fee (VLF) revenues to reimburse local governments for state mandated costs.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Reduces State Authority. This measure prohibits the state from enacting new laws that require
redevelopment agencies to ship funds to schools or other agencies. The measure also eliminates the
state's authority to shift property taxes temporarily during a severe state fiscal hardship. Under the
measure, therefore, the state would have to take other actions to balance its budget in some years —
such as reducing state spending or increasing state taxes. (Ballot Pamp., Gen. Elec. (Nov. 2010)
analysis of Prop. 22, pp. 30 -31, 34. Italics and underscoring added, bolding in original.)
2. Calif. Constitution, art. XVI, § 16(b):
Article XVI, § 16(b) states that redevelopment tax increment funds "shall be allocated to "
and when collected "paid into the fund of the redevelopment agency to pay the principal and
interest on ... indebtedness ... incurred by the redevelopment agency to finance ... the
redevelopment project."
The Governor's proposal satisfies neither of the criteria contained in Article XVI, § 16
because it does not allocate redevelopment funds to redevelopment agencies, and because it
does not use redevelopment funds to support redevelopment projects.
• Aside from its constitutional defects, the Governor's proposal is seriously flawed in several ways.
1. The Governor's proposal puts all local government financing at great risk.
a. The cloud placed over redevelopment agency obligations will no doubt have the same effect
on all local government financing in general because of the uncertainty created with respect to
who is responsible for redevelopment agency obligations after those agencies are eliminated.
2. The Governor's proposal creates a massive bureaucratic and political morass.
a. The proposal obscures how redevelopment agency obligations will be managed going forward
and shifts the ENTIRE responsibility for managing those obligations over the county auditor -
controllers, creating an immense additional burden for county administrators.
b. The proposal's opacity with respect to redevelopment obligations and future property tax
distributions presents significant risks for fraud, mismanagement, and endless litigation.
c. There will be huge disputes between so- called "successor agencies" in different counties,
between such "successor agencies" and the State, and between "successor agencies," the
State, and creditors of redevelopment agencies.
d. Under the proposal, if a city declines to act as a "successor agency" then any other local
agency in the county, regardless of its size, capabilities, or track record, can act as the
successor agency as long as it is the first agency to submit a resolution to that effect to the
county auditor - controller. This will create a "race to the auditor" and will no doubt ignite
disputes over "who got there first."
e. If cities decline to act as "successor agencies," then counties or other local agencies may be
forced into ownership of toxic and contaminated properties formerly slated for cleanup and
redevelopment.
3. The new "oversight boards" created in the Governor's proposal will be fraught with conflicts and will
undermine local collaboration and cooperation.
a. Given that the "oversight boards' — assuming they can be legally formed in the first place —
are to be made up of entities with inherent conflicts between one another regarding the
distribution of property tax revenues, ugly disputes are inevitable.
b. The proposal also provides a dangerously low level of oversight for the "oversight boards."
Members are granted personal immunity from suit, and they are not under any fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interests of the local taxing jurisdictions, the people of
California, or the State despite the fact that the "oversight boards" are given VAST authority
to order the disposal of assets, terminate agreements, negotiate compensation arrangements,
and set aside legally binding agreements that the board on its own accord deems to be in
violation of "public policy."
c. At a time when local and regional collaboration and cooperation is imperative, the Governor's
redevelopment proposal will poison local relationships by forcibly subjecting individually
elected city /county officials to the dictates of the unelected and unaccountable "oversight
boards."
4. The Governor's proposal creates potentially massive new administrative costs.
a. After dumping enormous new burdens on county auditor - controllers, the proposal authorizes
redevelopment funds to be used for the purpose of financing the dissolution of redevelopment
agencies —a potentially massive expense.
b. The State Controller's Office can tap redevelopment funds to pay for its costs associated with
the Governor's proposal, with no oversight or cap on the amount the Controller's Office may
charge, and county auditor - controllers are powerless to challenge or second -guess the
Controller's expenses.
5. The Governor's proposal could expose auditor - controllers to potentially substantial liability.
a. The proposal contains absolutely no limit on the liability of county auditor - controllers for any
mistakes made in administering redevelopment funds, disputes over determinations, or other
challenges to the auditor - controllers' decisions.
b. The only remedy counties have under the proposal to shield auditor - controllers from liability
would be to refuse to permit their auditor - controllers to administer the new program —in
which case the Department of Finance would step in and designate its own representative to
administer all property taxes collected in that county. And the Department of Finance's
designated representative would be paid out of county property taxes!
California Redevelopment Agencies (CRA) Proposal
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
• All Funds transferred Directly to Local School Districts
• Voluntarily Suspend FY `11 -12 Housing set -aside Funds = 2 yr extension for 20% one time
• Up 10% RDA (after pass through) = 10 year extension (1 year extension per 1% Sent; up to 10% for l0yrs)
• Supported by League of CA Cities
ANALYSIS:
• Estimated $2.7 billion to State over 10 years ($1 Billion more than Brown's Proposal)
• Estimated one -time upfront payments = $700 Million - $1 Billion range for FY '11 -12
• Replaces draconian and short- sighted approach
• Voluntary Program complies with Prop 22 and Article 16 of State Constitution (No wasteful law suit)
• Con - Would temporarily suspend Low -Mod Housing for 1 year
THE CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION'S ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR
VOLUNTARY REDEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS TO SCHOOLS
CRA has crafted an alternative to the Governor's proposed elimination of redevelopment agencies that
provides significant funding to schools that could also help close the state's budget deficit, avoids the
unconstitutional provisions of the proposal that would lead to contentious and costly legal battles, and
continues local redevelopment's contributions to reviving the state's economy and supporting hundreds of
thousands of jobs. A summary of our proposal is as follows:
1) Local redevelopment agencies can voluntarily suspend their housing set -aside for FY 2011 -12.
An equivalent amount of funds must then be contributed to local school districts in project areas.
(a) In exchange for this contribution of funds for FY 2011 -12 to local schools, the agency will be allowed
to extend the project area's life by TWO YEARS.
2) In addition, or alternatively, redevelopment agencies could voluntarily contribute up to 10
percent of their tax increment revenue stream to local school districts for 10 years, beginning in FY
2011 -12.
(a) The tax increment revenue stream they could contribute would be calculated as a percentage of the
gross tax increment minus the existing pass - through payments to local taxing entities.
(b) For each percentage of tax increment paid to schools, an additional year could be added to the project
area life, up to a maximum of 10 years. For example, if five percent of tax increment was dedicated to
schools, the project area life could be extended for five years.
The amount of money contributed to local schools, and thus the amount of money the state can save in its
budget, is dependent on the participation of agencies. Agencies will have 60 days from the date of
enactment of the legislation to decide whether or not to participate.
BENEFITS:
• CRA conservatively estimates that the alternative could raise more than $2.7 billion over
the 10 -year life of the proposal, far exceeding the $1.7 billion in the Governor estimates that
could be gained by eliminating redevelopment.
• Much of these funds (estimates range from $700 million to $1 billion) would be a one -time
upfront payment that could help bridge the FY 2011 -12 budget gap.
• This measure replaces the draconian and short- sighted proposal to abolish redevelopment. Local
communities would continue to have redevelopment as a tool to create jobs, build affordable
housing, and revive local economic growth.
• Because it is a voluntary program, it does not violate the State's Constitution or the will of the
voters when they passed Proposition 22. There will be no expensive, time - consuming lawsuits,
and no bonding or borrowing.
• The contributions to local schools could be used for discretionary purposes, and the State could
choose to score all or part of it towards Proposition 98 guarantees to school districts.
• The contribution would not count toward the redevelopment agency's debt limits.
If you have any questions or need further explanation on this alternative proposal, please contact the
California Redevelopment Association at (916) 448 -8760.
Most Recent Reform Proposal (City of Long Beach)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
• Voluntarily Subscribe to pay 10% to support 30 yr Statewide bond to pay down General Fund Debt
• The 10% payment would approx generate $400 million annual cash flow to support a $5.7 billion bond
• Participating Agencies MUST send 20% Housing Set -aside to Create new Statewide HCD managed Fund
account
• Participating Agencies earn 10 year project area extension
ANALYSIS:
• Estimated $5.7 billion to State over 30 years ($4 Billion more than Brown's Proposal)
• Est. one -time upfront payments = $400 million to support a Statewide bond
• Also creates estimated $4 billion Statewide Sustainable Housing and Infrastructure Fund
• Replaces draconian and short- sighted approach
• Voluntary Program complies with Prop 22 and Article 16 of State Constitution (No wasteful law suit)
• Con - Would revamp Low -Mod Housing allocations based on Geo Size and population
�_oq 3eq ch f CA ,
REDEVELOPMENT REFO RM, STATE DEBT REPAYMENT AND
STATEWIDE HOUSING FUND PROPOSAL
March 3, 2011
Summary and Intent
• Create a program that Redevelopment agencies (RDA) can voluntarily subscribe
into to create a significant revenue stream for the State to pay off General Fund
debt.
• This proposal:
• Allows redevelopment agencies to voluntarily provid their Gross Tax
Increment to permanently pay down State G I
• Creates up to $900 million irl nual is s for the State
General Fund.
• Creates a $4 billion State ide Sus t in ble Hou ing nd Infras ructure Fund
• Enacts signi ' ant R�evel pment r for s.
1. Redevelopment 4genci s wou d vol ntarily subsc a ga0a project area basis to a
program to pay 1 % of ross t incr ment less fisting pass- through payments to
local taxing entities) to upport 3 ar tatewide bond issue to permanently pay
down State General F d de eferred to herein as 10% RDA Payment).
2. This voluntary 1 o RDA Payment to a State Trust Bond Account (assuming full
participation) would generate approximately $400 million in annual cash flow that
could support a $5.7 billion bond. -3axr
3. The $5.7 billion would be used to pay down $5.7 billion in General Fund debt, saving
the State from paying the annual debt service on those bonds, creating a long -term
General Fund savings and raising the State's bond rating by eliminating General
Fund debt. The debt secured by Redevelopment funds would not be considered
State General Fund debt and would be paid out of a special State Trust Account.
RDAs would be required to make the 10% payment for a minimum of 30 years.
4. Any funds from the 10% RDA Payment shall be first used to ensure payment of the
State debt service. The State may use any dollar amount from that payment that is
not needed to cover State debt service for an eligible Redevelopment use consistent
with Article 16.
5. As this is a voluntary program that cities could opt into, it is legal under the State
Constitution and does not require amendments to Prop. 22.
6. Consistent with Article 16 of the Constitution, these funds would pay off state debt
that has benefited Redevelopment project areas, including but not limited to
education bonds, housing bonds, and transportation bonds.
Page 1 of 5
REDEVELOPMENT REFORM, STATE DEBT REPAYMENT AND
STATEWIDE HOUSING FUND PROPOSAL
March 3, 2011
Use Housing Set Aside Funds to Create a Sustainable Housing and Infrastructure
Fund and Pay Down State General Fund Debt
Cities that subscribe to the 10% RDA Payment also must automatically transfer their
20% Set -Aside payments to the State for the following purposes:
1. For 30 years, Housing Set -Aside Funds not currently obligated would be bonded
against to leverage a maximum amount of $15.7 billion (le s funds currently
obligated). Assuming that 70 percent of those funds are d, $11 billion in
funds would be available for the following:
a. Creation of a $4 billion State S ustaiti o nd Infrastructure
Fund in the Department of Hou� nd C ity Dev�o= ent (HCD) that
cities and associated hou ing orga i tions` th t p 'd the 10° RDA Payment
could immediately a ss.
b. Use $7 ' ion to immn7diate a d wn ddition State Gener I Fund debt to
Yp Y
generat an a ditional G eral Fu d s ings fr m debt servi a payments.
These fu ds w uld go irectly to a special tate ust Bond Ac unt to repay
the bond G wth le e a amo ne ded t support t e debt service
would be Iloca d to Sta ewide Sustai bl ousing and Infrastructure
Fund. 2. All 20% Housing Set- ide f not currently obligated that are remaining in fund
balances after J 2011 will also be transferred to HCD to supplement the
sustainable Housing and Infrastructure Fund.
3. Any 20% Set -Aside funds that are owed to the local housing fund from
Redevelopment Agencies would also be sent to HCD for the Sustainable Housing
and Infrastructure Fund when those loans are due.
Opt -In Provisions
In order to encourage Redevelopment Agencies to subscribe to this program, any
agency that opts -in voluntarily by June 1, 2011 will be allowed to do the following:
1. Be granted a 10 -year project area extension with an expedited finding of blight
(using the expedited process similar to the current process for establishing an RDA
for Earthquake damage) with each local Redevelopment agency making that
voluntary decision for each project area. All timelines for project areas that have not
yet expired (incurring new debt, raise debt capacity, increase debt limit, etc) would
be extended for 10 years.
a. All agencies will have 24 months from June 1, 2011 to complete the
process to extend their project areas if they choose to.
�a AWO -re<<)
Page 2 of 5
REDEVELOPMENT REFORM, STATE DEBT REPAYMENT AND
STATEWIDE HOUSING FUND PROPOSAL
March 3, 2011
2. In order to ensure a secured debt stream to pay the 10% RDA Payment, agencies
will be allowed to extend project areas beyond the voluntary 10 -year extension for
the sole purpose of repaying the 10% RDA Payment. All other tax increment not
used for making this 10% RDA Payment would be returned to the taxing entities per
traditional tax sharing formulas.
In addition, a Redevelopment Agency may voluntarily spend up to 10 percent of their
total net Tax Increment (defined as after the agencies pay for pass- throughs,
the 10% RDA Payment, 20% set -aside and bond ede nnually on the
following:
a. Brownsfield redevelopment citywide for sitk cep only; nds may not be
e a used for physical improv ents "or si dev6.10 ent.
�gv� y 2 ( b. Limited public imp a is withi 5 iles of a pr 'ect area such as parks
and open s ace d velop ent, p blic safety ' structure, arterial street
reconst c ion and r habi tation), not o exce d the muni 'pal /county
boundari s.
�0 c. Creation f affo able h usin project
4e A provision woul be i cluded 'n the State ide d covenants (for the 10% RDA
Payment) stating that f tax i cre t diverted in the future, the 10% RDA
Payment will cease a d the I faith and credit of the State General Fund will
assume the deb ice. This provides an extra level of protection and State
commitment to protecting against future takes of Redevelopment funding.
Sustainable Housing and Infrastructure Fund
1. HCD will use 20% Set -Aside funds from Redevelopment Agencies that subscribe to
the 10% RDA Payment to immediately create a Statewide fund for affordable
housing, infill development, transit oriented development, housing - related
infrastructure, and programs to comply with SIB 375 requirements.
a. Only cities that opt -into the 10% RDA Payment program will be allowed to
access those funds.
b. Funds would be balanced by geographic region and population, ensuring an
appropriate distribution of the funds.
c. Competitive grants would be at the discretion of HCD.
2. Funds will be used for:
a. Facilitating affordable housing projects
b. Facilitating infill development projects
Page 3 of 5
REDEVELOPMENT REFORM, STATE DEBT REPAYMENT AND
STATEWIDE HOUSING FUND PROPOSAL
March 3, 2011
c. Improving Affordable Housing - related infrastructure within '/ mile of an
affordable housing project such as: park and open space development;
mobility improvements such as traffic mitigation, bike projects, linkages to
mass transit; low impact development stormwater improvements; and street
reconstruction
d. Funding SB 375 - related requirements and projects that reduce vehicle -miles
traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. _.wool&
Reform and Transparency
The following reform
enacted:
1. Restrictedf tae le , e th cies land DAs would be
required to °re, la it five sell d for F tr- Market Value.
The five year ` me fr me co me' ces one `full site as' mbly is cora� leted. A one-
The five
this ive year ti a frame may b grante by the legisl tive body.
2. Specifically proh it us of red veto ment f to ay for olice and ire personnel.
3. Constrain the int rest to tha agen ies m y u o repay city /county debt to not
exceed the rate on 30 -y ar tax loc nds.
4. Require the State C roller o set statewide rules governing the calculation of all
pass- through p ents administered by the counties, ensuring a standard
calculation methodology.
5. Require the State Controller to revamp the annual filing requirements for the
Statement of Indebtedness (SOI) and provide specific direction on what needs to be
included in the annual SOI reports. The same report shall be filed both the County
Auditor / Controller and with the State Controller.
6. Require all agencies to determine a set amortization schedule for repayment of all
city /county debt.
7. Require any project receiving $250,000 or more in assistance from a redevelopment
agency to prepare a Summary Report in accordance with Section 33433 of Health &
Safety Code, providing disclosures as to the source and use of funds, etc.
Page 4 of 5
REDEVELOPMENT REFORM, STATE DEBT REPAYMENT AND
STATEWIDE HOUSING FUND PROPOSAL
March 3, 2011
Financial Benefits
1. This proposal creates $5.7 billion from the 10% RDA Payment and $7 billion from
the Housing Set -Aside fund for a total of $12.7 billion to pay of eligible State General
Fund bonds that benefit the Redevelopment area.
a. By paying off $12.7 billion in State General Fund State General
Fund can be relieved of $900 million annua d payments that
the State can direct for any use.
2. This proposal directs an ount of 0% yment needed for debt
service towards school futur Gen Fuin d savi
3. This prop tes in i to f . creat a Sustainable
Housing and ctute: U 1 1
a. Addition Ily, a y outstandi g fund b Ian c s woul be placed in the Fund, as
well as ny fu ure furWs owed by Rede elopm nt agencies o their 20%
Housing et -Asi e, pro iding dditio oll rs.
Economic Benefit
1. Redevelopment ntinue in California, serving as a significant economic engine,
creating jobs, economic growth, and generating tax income for both the State and
local governments.
a. The 10% RDA Payment will not be easy for many agencies to make as it
represents a substantial amount of funds after pass - throughs, debt service
and other obligations; however, this voluntary program would allow
Redevelopment to continue in California while supporting the State.
2. This proposal creates $4 billion at a Statewide level to support construction
investment in affordable housing, infill development, and multiple infrastructure
projects to create additional jobs.
Page 5 of 5
Agenda Item No. C� ` b , -3 " k
STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Economic Development /f
Date: April 5, 2011
Subject: Beaumont Cares Action Team - Stimulus Update
Background and Analysis:
The City of Beaumont has used a proactive approach to mitigate the wave of home foreclosure's
many cities in California have struggled to deal with in the past few years. The City of Beaumont
has been tracking foreclosure rates citywide long before the economy started its downturn in Sept.
2008. A Foreclosure Activity Report showing the foreclosure activity from January 2006 to
February 2011 has been provided for your review. Beaumont's highest foreclosure activity rate was
in June 2009, at 3.5 %, at a time when most of Riverside County experienced double digit rates.
The Beaumont Cares Awareness Team has been a valuable asset to the City by identifying issues
early on, and thus helping Staff and other agencies fix an issue before it becomes a larger nuisance.
Attached for your review is the Beaumont Cares Awareness Team Map with the number of Real
Estate Owned Properties in each of the 10 BCAT areas. The team assists the City identify distressed
properties that may have not yet registered.
Beaumont's Pro - Active Distressed Property Tracking System:
• Deals with the many challenges a community faces when a recession occurs
• Requires Distressed and/or Vacant Properties to Register with the City.
• Actively tracks distressed properties and solves issues (i.e. weed, green pools, security)
• Encourages back and forth Communication between City Staff and Banks
• If the owner, typically a bank, does not comply, Staff performs the work and subsequently
liens the property for the cost of services provided.
• Helps prevent community blight and keep property values up
• Online Request Partner system allows citizens to submit concerns via the web
Respectfully submitted;
CITY OF BEAUMONT
e arsinski 1
Community Development Analyst
t�
Lr)
Ll1
0
l" I
t0
'cl,
r-
00
i
0
O
m
Ll1
N
N
++
0
-4
"I
N
m
Ln
t.0
o
O
�
00
°In
rn rq
Ln
N
N
o
O
00
O
N
�
N
r-I
M
1
00
rn
M
O
a
O
O
to
v1
O
Lf)
O
°
N
3
m
O
O
N
o
01
O
r-I
r-I
rI
r-i
00
Il
rn
0)
00
N
c
O
N
A
m
3
L
O�
It
1.01
O
O
r-I
n
M
N
O
Un
N
m
m
00
L
co
01
lD
W
n
O
N
O
N
o
L
1
01
N
N
00
M
to
c
O
0)
M
N
Ln
r-I
O
L
O
=
m
A
�
^
O
�.
CY)
rM-I
E
o
°
m
00
U
o
{n
a
p
O
Lfl
N
M
N
L
LO
M
O
3
C
m
_0
L
L
°°
-,%
3
O
a
In
O
(D
.-I
o
ct
r-I
N
O
N
O
^I
i
0
c
Ln
IA
CL
0
0
v
o
a
N
O
s
C
O
�
o`
N
�
O
y
vOi
o
Q
Ln
f�
LL
d
G
m
^
W
r
H
O
o
Lr)
Ll1
0
r-I
M
ICT
m
Ll1
N
O
++
0
-4
"I
N
Ln
t.0
o
00
O
N
�
n
r-I
M
O
O
O
Lf)
°
C
3
O
O
N
o
M
W
J
O
L
m
O
M
m
00
L
Q
O
N
o
L
01
N
N
N
r4
`m
r
00
U
o
{n
a
p
O
Lfl
N
M
N
L
°°
3
o
a
o
ct
o
N
i
Ln
0
o
N
Q
Ln
f�
N
o
m
On
M
o \°
00
n
rl
�
o
w
CLO
o
O
O
t
1—
o
V
a
UW
U
is
O
m
w
I I=
o
'3nb
U
w�
J
a
x
O
�
VIN3X
a
I
O
�
N
z
x
'3AV AM3HO � p
V) I
1S 3190N
} _
Ln
Q
O
-3nb ' iNOvqnV38
a;
N
4`.
Y
rr^^
W
m �
`
J
1
W
S
�
O �
U
°
a
z
>
U
cz
•
O
d
U
I
•'
w
g°
,
IP
1
lefl[M
COREN & CONE
THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
FORECLOSURE ACTIVITY
Jan -2006
5
16
0
21
0.2%
Feb - 2006
7
22
0
29
0.3%
Mar - 2006
11
0
1
12
0.1%
Apr - 2006
10
1
0
11
0.1%
May - 2006
16
0
0
16
0.2%
Jun - 2006
7
1
0
8
0.1%
Jul - 2006
10
1
0
11
0.1%
Aug - 2006
19
0
1
20
0.2°x6
Sep - 2006
24
3
0
27
0.3%
Oct - 2006
19
1
0
20
0.2%
Nov - 2006
38
5
0
43
0.5%
Dec - 2006
24
5
0
29
0.3%
Jan -2007
38
4
4
46
0.5%
Feb -2007
46
12
2
60
0.7%
Mar - 2007
45
16
1
62
0.7%
Apr - 2007
43
3
2
48
0.5%
May - 2007
58
18
2
78
0.9%
Jun -2007
38
15
4
57
0.7%
Jul - 2007
43
13
4
60
0.7%
Aug - 2007
89
22
20
131
1.5%
Sep - 2007
84
25
18
127
1.5%
Oct - 2007
47
33
28
108
1.2%
Nov - 2007
40
25
16
81
0.9°x6
Dec - 2007
60
24
35
119
1.4%
Jan -2008
94
23
38
155
1.8%
Feb - 2008
75
18
16
109
1.2%
Mar - 2008
111
14
32
157
1.8%
ALAu r - 2008
75
57
47
179
2.0%
- 2008
114
25
66
205
2.3%
- 2008
116
10
52
178
2.0%
- 2008
99
18
62
179
2.0%
- 2008
91
57
79
227
2.6%
Sep - 2008
58
52
54
164
1.9%
Oct - 2008
39
48
65
152
1.7%
Nov - 2008
41
47
50
138
1.5%
Dec - 2008
106
62
34
202
2.2%
Jan -2009
107
74
50
231
2.5%
Feb - 2009 . 123 51 56 230 2.5%
165 101 31 297 <:: 3'�3%
Apr - 2009 129 82 35 246 2.7%
May-- 2009
119
104
41
264
2.9%
Jun --2- RO
120
137
57
314
3.5%
Uul
111
97
81
289
X3_22
Aug - 2009
115
109
42
266
2.9%
Sep - 2009
107
68
48
223
2.5%
Oct - 2009
81
82
52
215
2.4%
Nov - 2009
75
71
43
189
2.1%
Dec - 2009
53
83
49
185
2.0%
Foreclosure data is grouped by zip code which may not follow municipal boundaries.
Notices of Defau@: Indicates that the property owner has missed at least one scheduled loan payment
Notice of Trustee's Sale: A document announcing the public sale of a property to recover debt owed by the owner of the property
Real Estate owned: Property is now owned by the lender as a result of a foreclosure.
Data Source: ReeltyTrec U.S. Foreclosure Market Report Prepared On 3/15/2011 By PC
This report Is not to be used In support of debt Issuance or contfnrring disclosure statements without the wdff n consent of Hdl., Page 1
coren b cone
r -m THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
, i
FORECLOSURE ACTIVITY
COREN & CONE
Jan - 2010
58
73
59
190
2.1%
Feb - 2010
84
65
32
181
2.0%
Mar - 2010
93
92
67
252
2.7%
Apr - 2010
84
70
60
214
2.3%
May - 2010
55
80
56
191
2.1%
Jun - 2010
75
101
43
219
2.4%
Jul - 2010
83
92
50
225
2.4%
Aug - 2010
70
67
62
199
2.2%
Sep - 2010
75
73
44
192
2.1
Oct - 2010
81
62
34
177
v Nov - 2010
52
68
30
150
1.6%
Dec - 2010
71
69
48
188
2.0%
Jan - 2011
65
76
45
186
2.0%
i Feb - 2011
61
50
35
146
1.6%
— Notices of Default — Notices of Trustee's — Real Estate Owned
Sale
180
160
140
120
c
V 100
80
60
40
20
0
0o d° o `O o0 oO o1 0'� '� '� o'� ti o0 00 � o o�' 0 00 0°' o0 0°' oo ,�o ,�o ,�o ,�o ,�o ,moo ,�•
yo yo yoo yo° yo yo �o �o goo ycA yo ycP yo yo tioo,yoo yo ,yoo do yo tio°�'yo yo yo yo do yo do do o lyo
1 *11010, S3 41191 0 �at14040 SJ ,ao410, SJ S�Q oJ,1011,4 X40 N-13 o� 101"10,40 IS3 4111 o0,,"
Period
Data Source. ReaftyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Afarket Report Prepared On 3/15/2011 By PC
This report is not to be used In support of debt Issuance or continuing d9sc /osure statements without the written consent of H&L Page 2
Coren & Cone
The City of Beaumont is Pleased to Offer the Pass Area
ANIMAL CARE SERVICES
LICENSING CLINIC AND Low -COST VACCINATIONS
Saturday • April 02, 2011
9:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Beamont Animal Clinic
764 3rd St
Beaumont, CA 92223
This clinic will be held the first Saturday of the month!
For dates or more information, please contact the City of Beaumont at (951) 769 -8520
or visit www.ci.beaumont.ca.us
VETERINARY SERVICES AND COST
VACCINATIONS-CANINE
• DA2PPV- $11.00
• DA2PPV +CV- $13.00
• BORD- $11.00
• RABIES -$8.00
• RATTLE - $25.00
• LYME- $25.00
• DEWORMER -$9.00
• MICROCHIP - $20.00
VACCINATIONS - FELINE
• FVRCP- $11.00
• FELV- $16.00
• DEWORMER -$9.00
• MICROCHIP - $20.00
j.k�, � -j
STAFF REPO T
t
TO: Alan C. Kapanicas, City Manager 6� I
FROM: Elizabeth Urtiaga, Resources Director
SUBJECT: Request Partner Update
DATE: April 5, 2011
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS :
In 2003, the City of Beaumont purchased an electronic and web -based work order system called
RequestPartner to replace the manual, triplicate form work order system that was in place from
1997. RequestPartner is a citizen and staff request system that processes all inquiries, requests
for service, complaints, and issues using a centralized database. The system includes real -time
24/7 access to both staff and the public and can be found on the City's home page at
www.ci.beaumont.ca.us.
RequestPartner automatically assigns each request to a specific staff person in the appropriate
department with a predetermined due date. The system automatically monitors due dates and
provides emails to create accountability for each request in the system and ensure nothing falls
through the cracks.
Some of RequestPartner's features and functionality include:
Advanced customizable dashboards for both staff and the public
Various levels of access and permissions set by system administrator
Ability to create internal request forms that are not viewable by the public
Auto - notification to staff by email for new requests
Automatic audit trails on activities
• Easy -to -use: anyone from any department can easily point and click through the system
• FAQ- creator allows staff to link "Frequently Asked Questions" to request forms
• Updates to requests can be emailed and letters can be batch printed
• Powerful reporting capabilities
• System auto - archives all data
In 2010, we had a total of 899 requests entered in to the RequestPartner system. Since its
inception, we have processed a total of 8,790 requests. Attached are summary reports showing
detail by department for 2010 and the first quarter of 2011.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council receive and file this report.
Summary By Department
Estimated Completion Date: between 1/1/2010 And 12/31/2010
Received Date: between 1/1/2010 And 12/31/2010
Public Works 77
Police 13
Administration
9 9
19' 1!
0 0
3
36 36
9 "Ll 00A 54 54
�Il�
.I A,I
fd I d lul �I II I u IreY � Ilu "� 'ti
reed d I M>j� � + � �� � 6< Wf" r� I!N �plf
9,9•��, III u" ti, ,u r..:.n'Ru^ a. _,,.,,,..+r. rvre r�Nl„ VIII lul7u I
Customer Service 18 2.20%
x�� rl 11
A IfVl hlJ ulx�� x'1 ���* o- lI ItlII
11, , V "uf"s,N
Building, Grounds, and Maintenance
Department
a m A &pxl I I@ I'lul I "'mow #kl 4l lfr ti*X "�I.
Yli�ih�II111I "Ilp "Idil A"I +
Deputy City Clerk
Totals
Distribution By Department
4 4
=p` t .� I,q uII Irre .*. y vrp III flylu "IreA. "I
d �
����x � r!�v IV61� ��G �u I�I�II IN V�' " +�,", � � NI ,�i��M d• IY rtiG
��� x '� v+ ly7 II +''' 411N Irll IIIQI xrd� a Txl�lhl" VM tly�a�z� .��WY�iI �" � ti IIIA uPVY�I a .,
I~, t
159 19.440/0 12 12
6 0.73%
�
k I
l y w. x .Cllr I I VIII, �,
4 4
III I
of
II ��nll p s III
' +ulI�I�II�II r rGa 4�lyur "V�w��r�7f h �Idrl �lilll
818
Police
o u itv Services
nmme�ortroment
uiltlin grounds, and Maintenance Department
U�b }I � Wo ks
o s �omtetraa ernnvice
Em must Litt'Verk
City Manaaer
Summary By Department
Estimated Completion Date: between 1/1/2011 And 3/14/2011
Received Date: between 1/1/2011 And 3/14/2011
ublic Works 27 '20
Distribution By Department
Community Services
duildinq, Vrounds, and Maintenance Uepartment
2blic Works
ministration
Code tntorcement
19 Police
o Animal Control
mm Customert5ervece
I ransit
9➢ r R pIL ^Ih, ARC 9x�� 'Y 114ri„y 41��'J,�illl .ty 1�V „� WXab I�I'+pI tlry `I� it Itl h 1�` rG P'�y7'i 0.^ J �h M VP�u'h`If�.''9 '^F k'vjy
Iwl �� 11�y x lid
aW,�as��lm "r 1C
Y I� M� I� t P f p r� V: 'N` P
4IV '"4`��'.'.�. �. W01'90' 'a ERR!
hR . .a ..
wr f�lii� li I. a. ,�s.^ -'. >wx✓ �a,x>t w4 .. 1 h u� li R q r u y,)wd Mx1Fr°.
.."iA
Deliuty City Clerk
1 0.77% 4 4
ftlr f 14 v� i� t' r I,� ,✓o n'.
V r r Ilr r 9111♦i � xar�
� I
m�4 #h. E n h rr u � I�r �I.
u 7 1 Jw
w � + V I.k 1 `P� ��1 I "h
�� "" � ",
? • ° ^t I � - � rr �I>,�.. � ^ . . , .
Totals
130
Distribution By Department
Community Services
duildinq, Vrounds, and Maintenance Uepartment
2blic Works
ministration
Code tntorcement
19 Police
o Animal Control
mm Customert5ervece
I ransit
may,
♦ e' �., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
�EDISON'
An ED /SON IAWRNAMMALx C—p-y
i
i
' � i
s
1�
S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION
Ci o Beaumont
On behalf of the California State Senate, it is my pleasure to honor and
congratulate the City of Beaumont for their Energy Leadership Partnership
with Southern California Edison. The City of Beaumont's GOLD level status
displays the city's dedication and collaborative efforts with obtaining
greenhouse gas reductions, energy efficiency best practices and their overall
commitment with creating a healthy and resource - efficient community.
March 25, 2011
Bill Emmerson, Senator 3 7`h District
0
0
0
0
U
C
fE
c
m
O
U
liS
_i
Y
m
m
d
C
0
U
T
C
t0
vi
0
c
O
o-
O 0 _o
E at
IM
O ca
Y
u
,r o m
�
CL.
2 0
CL
L N
O
a d ai
L
L co
!_ _o C Mn
O C d N
X R
L IA 0
Q O O CU
C
ca _
U U Cc
= w E
m 0
p •- T U
a. 3 v rn
U cn L
_ i
_ 0
O v 0
� U
d
L
CLI
C
p
H
cc
a
c
ca
co
d
a
a
'C
cc
i
y
w
i
-a
c
CQ
i
vj
CD
cn
C
y
cQ
��-
T
w
C
cc
n
�-
y
cC
•3
T
0
a
CD
+�
C
cc
cc
E
i
cc
cts
a
w
a
a
a
O
s �
o
= N
L
�1
O
N
zo-
CM
O
o s
cc
O
L�
C
L r
cO 3
G 7
3:
a
d
H
v
E+
a
s
0
•N
0
d
`o
3
(
A
fC
Q.
cocC
'a
0
CD
i
N
L
N
N
L
C
ca
a)
rn
c
O
O
>
y
3
O
cn
O
�a
cam•
Q) ,Lm. o c N
C c u M= G E 3 E� o
OE N N L L .°. N C •1Y �
Y d tp 0 U .m+r0. U m L
p L 3 .°.. > N L O E N
:. '� L oD � a, a, ;F .E .2 o
y U d c: d d N O m e
•� C O N L C p L •� C V
•� I .0 U o d U m N G o
O N V ..Nm. U 7 N L IL- m
U L M V N 'O x' t!1 L T
•� r0 .N N m E L L •m O N L
• •_ E G d > m 0C w C Of O` 2 'O
0 O O d N 44 > v m rn U O
u_ E ,N d o
3 Q m 0' L C C N N y
E m m .5 N
rn
m
.Q
O
U
E
C
ttY
O
L
3
O
tC
.E
c
c
cu
E
y
7
O
U
O
C
A
c
M
E
m
Y
U
N
L
v
c
7
N
C
C
O
U
c
O
c
(D
E
O
C
d
L
!Z
U)
.c
'0
L'.
T
3
v w a d
E w
O
+••
0
C
C
°
c.
{ "t3
m
W O .
T
r U) N � .0 O
0 /1
T O
N N En 7
01 U 01 t
CL
S C
C
f�6
P
E
>
vi
�O
c
N 7 0..
N V m r N c w O`
co
m
'a
co
t
E
.�
00
w m c o ..E m`
0
E
O
N
s=
O w
w x
o c N d °
° `. rn d c 3 m �h:
i
L
U _Q
L
�
�
T
GI
_U
3
�-
Q
o
p
N
.E
i
A
O
L O
p
O C
a..
Z
_mv
u m w N m °- E
°1
m
�p
t
ult LoE�m
fa
M
to
t\
E
O-
O
Y
d
�'
G
L_
`O
U
(6
m
O
t6
E
m
.�
O
N
_
O
d
O
O
Y
c
A
Co
L
L
Q
IE
�
•E
C
A
O
�
m
+
a
y
a�
U
C
N
O
7
V
E
v
C
D
C
3
rn
ate•+
R
N
O
O
d
3
O
O
E
co
En
O
U
(a
O
L
E
L
o
E
C
}
ca
y
7
O
U
O
C
A
c
M
E
m
Y
U
N
L
v
c
7
N
C
C
O
U
c
O
c
(D
E
O
C
d
L
!Z
U)
.c
w
W 75
N-E! O G O O O +�•
d C '00 U N O E Y M '0 M O
( 0 V C y C cu p M C M U
'v m.0 u c y -� 0 m o ai
w E N E E° •° c$ G W
- CL U N G m= c t!1 � d L
C
° o� m tm aNi E 0 °
.m. N L .r N i0
a m G L 3 a o E L
L 0 a w •° y w $° m> m
d 4' O C N O m G N Of L .N
u C E O E - m N E 0 L "0 L
m N C Of Im
L N .�. O C 'n > y E m v
.°• 'O O 3 V m ME 'O ..�. O
U)
c
O
M
Z
m
c
N
R
N
L
ftS
W
t
m
s
t
U
Rf
O
N
-a
lyC
i
O
d
E
O
O
t
G
t
3
.3
O
M.
c;
c
'0
L'.
3
v w a d
E w
cu G/ G O1 tm
L C C G N Yl
• L U
•m
+••
0
.. ,.
_° c. ° rn _ c °
=• -0 ?i
°
c.
{ "t3
m
W O .
T
r U) N � .0 O
0 /1
T O
N N En 7
01 U 01 t
CL
S C
L C c
c 7 O O
m L N N
N>
vi
�O
U
7
N 7 0..
N V m r N c w O`
W p•,
_ L yl N Y U
C
C L
N
'V
O1 .0
m m E
,rd, CL N
w E m c> ip
E
.�
w m c o ..E m`
0
E
p m
m-
. Of OL
°- U
O w
w x
o c N d °
° `. rn d c 3 m �h:
° m
L
U _Q
L
�
.L.. N m •a m .0 N N
'm0
m
GI
_U
3
E
uNi m L ` m a-
c
A
O
L O
p
O C
a..
Z
o
u m w N m °- E
°1
�p
3Q
ult LoE�m
Z
t\
41 U
3
Y
w
W 75
N-E! O G O O O +�•
d C '00 U N O E Y M '0 M O
( 0 V C y C cu p M C M U
'v m.0 u c y -� 0 m o ai
w E N E E° •° c$ G W
- CL U N G m= c t!1 � d L
C
° o� m tm aNi E 0 °
.m. N L .r N i0
a m G L 3 a o E L
L 0 a w •° y w $° m> m
d 4' O C N O m G N Of L .N
u C E O E - m N E 0 L "0 L
m N C Of Im
L N .�. O C 'n > y E m v
.°• 'O O 3 V m ME 'O ..�. O
U)
c
O
M
Z
m
c
N
R
N
L
ftS
W
t
m
s
t
U
Rf
O
N
-a
lyC
i
O
d
E
O
O
t
G
t
3
.3
O
M.
c;
c
L'.
z
N T
C L
L
cu G/ G O1 tm
L C C G N Yl
• L U
•m
N
r0
F.
a
U d rp.
O U)
VI N U t0 4) •O
m
O1 L
c.
{ "t3
m
W O .
T
r U) N � .0 O
0 /1
w •�
3.:
L C c
> p '° I m m w
m'0
m o
U U
u
O
m 0
N
_ L yl N Y U
C
C L
N
'V
O1 .0
m m E
,rd, CL N
w E m c> ip
m
.2 •D
p m
m-
. Of OL
°- U
L- °'
.� c w G i .- E
L-
d O
G
L w° ._
tN
t m
7
tN
w 'o C G
m
C u
C
_=
O N Q
E Q-
E
m 0
L
a,
.0
U m
u`orld Health Day 2011
v� V
World Organ ati`on
COMBAT ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
What is ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE?
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is resistance of a microorganism to an antimicrobial medicine to which it was
previously sensitive. Resistant organisms (they include bacteria, viruses and some parasites) are able to withstand
attack by antimicrobial medicines, such as antibiotics, antivirals, and antimalarials, so that standard treatments
become ineffective and infections persist and may spread to others. AMR is a consequence of the use, particularly
the misuse, of antimicrobial medicines and develops when a microorganism mutates or acquires a resistance gene.
WHY IS AMR A GLOBAL CONCERN?
> AMR kills — Infections caused by resistant microorganisms
often fail to respond to the standard treatment, resulting in
prolonged illness and greater risk of death.
> AMR challenges control of infectious diseases — AMR
reduces the effectiveness of treatment because patients remain
infectious for longer, thus potentially spreading resistant
microorganisms to others.
> AMR threatens a return to the pre- antibiotic era — Many
infectious diseases risk becoming uncontrollable and could
derail the progress made towards reaching the targets of the
health - related United Nations Millennium Development Goals
set for 2015.
Source: World Health Organization. Muttidrug and extensively drug- resistant
TB (M /XOR -TB). Global Report on Surveillance and Response
WM I - 111�
0 0 0%to <316
a o 3%to <6%
0 o6 %IOa 12%
® all%
=NW
> AMR increases the costs of health care — When infections
become resistant to first -line medicines, more expensive
therapies must be used. The longer duration of illness and
treatment, often in hospitals, increases health -care costs and
the financial burden to families and societies.
> AMR jeopardizes health -care gains to society — The
achievements of modern medicine are put at risk by AMR. Without
effective antimicrobials for care and prevention of infections,
the success of treatments such as organ transplantation, cancer
chemotherapy and major surgery would be compromised.
> AMR compromises health security, and damages trade and
economies — The growth of global trade and travel allows
resistant microorganisms to be spread rapidly to distant
countries and continents.
Source: European Centre for Disease
Prevention and control. Antimicrobial
resistance surveillance in Europe
1009. Annual Report of the European
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance
Network (EARS -Net) .�
sxa<ux .
� uxt. <:sx
■ 251, h.51%
� M Ah raparted
�aat
N tw than 70 Mataa
Do irxlede/
d
I �bv
an
COMBAT DRUG RESISTANCE
No action today, no cure tomorrow
Facts on antimicrobial resistance
oAbout 440 000 new cases of multidrug- resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) emerge annually, causing at least 150 000 deaths. Extensively drug- resistant
tuberculosis (XDR TB) has been reported in 64 countries to date.
O' Resistance to earlier generation antimalarial medicines such as chloroquine and sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine is widespread in most malaria - endemic
countries. Ealciparum malaria parasites resistant to artemisinins are emerging in South -East Asia; infections show delayed clearance after the start of
treatment (indicating resistance).
Q A high percentage of hospital- acquired infections are caused by highly resistant bacteria such as methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and
vancomycin - resistant enterococci.
O Resistance is an emerging concern for treatment of HIV infection, following the rapid expansion in access to antiretroviral medicines in recent years;
national surveys are underway to detect and monitor resistance.
Ciproftoxacin is the only antibiotic currently recommended by WHO for the management of bloody diarrhoea due to Shigella organisms, now that widespread
resistance has developed to other previously effective antibiotics. But rapidly increasing prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin is reducing the options for
safe and efficacious treatment of shigellosis, particularly for children. New antibiotics suitable for oral use are badly needed.
AMR has become a serious problem for treatment of gonorrhoea (caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae), involving even "last -line" oral cephalosporins, and is
increasing in prevalence worldwide. Untreatable gonococcal infections would result in increased rates of illness and death, thus reversing the gains made in
the control of this sexually transmitted infection.
New resistance mechanisms, such as the beta - lactamase NOM -1, have emerged among several gram- negative bacilli. This can render powerful antibiotics,
which are often the last defence against multi - resistant strains of bacteria, ineffective.
WHAT DRIVES AMR?
Inappropriate and irrational use of medicines provides favourable
conditions for resistant microorganisms to emerge and spread.
For example, when patients do not take the full course of a
prescribed antimicrobial or when poor quality antimicrobials
are used, resistant microorganisms can emerge and spread.
Underlying factors that drive AMR include:
> Inadequate national commitment to a comprehensive and co-
ordinated response, ill- defined accountability and insufficient
engagement of communities.
> Weak or absent surveillance and monitoring systems.
• Inadequate systems to ensure quality and uninterrupted sup-
ply of medicines.
• Inappropriate and irrational use of medicines, including in
animal husbandry.
• Poor infection prevention and control practices.
• Depleted arsenals of diagnostics, medicines and vaccines
as well as insufficient research and development on new
products.
COMBAT DRUG RESISTANCE
No action today, no cure tomorrow
The emergence of AMR is a complex problem driven by many
interconnected factors; single, isolated interventions have little
impact. A global and national multi - sectoral response is urgently
needed to combat the growing threat of AMR.
THE RESPONSE OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
WHO is engaged in guiding the response to AMR through:
policy guidance, support for surveillance, technical assistance,
knowledge generation and partnerships, including through
disease prevention and control programmes; essential medicines
quality, supply and rational use; infection prevention and control;
patient safety; and laboratory quality assurance.
WHO calls on all key stakeholders, including policy- makers and
planners, the public and patients, practitioners and prescribers,
pharmacists and dispensers, and the pharmaceutical industry,
to act and take responsibility for combating antimicrobial
resistance.
For more information: http: / /www.who.int /world - health- day /2011
0 World Health Organization 2011. All rights reserved.
AN
E
_4 7
® ®®••!•
Albert Chatigny Sr.
Community Recreation Center
located at 1310 Oak Valley Parkway
h rei
l ICS`
i.
timil l'
faw, at7d
0
0
1�
A n e vv n i n f u f iL
Jazz & Blues Bands and a
performance by the City's
own band
"Jam with the Man"
Enjoy Cajun style food from
our vendor area featuring
Beaumont Fire Departments
Famous Gumbo!
Visit with local merchants
and business owners
E.1
0
Play Games!
-Y Of Beiiu'n 1"�
4"If fAi tj S I t i
heh' "mr port
April 9th, 2011
from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m.
Albert Chatigny Sr.
Community Recreation Center
located at 1310 Oak Valley Parkway
h rei
l ICS`
i.
timil l'
faw, at7d
0
0
1�
A n e vv n i n f u f iL
Jazz & Blues Bands and a
performance by the City's
own band
"Jam with the Man"
Enjoy Cajun style food from
our vendor area featuring
Beaumont Fire Departments
Famous Gumbo!
Visit with local merchants
and business owners
E.1
0
Play Games!
CENTRAL RIVERSIDE COUNTY �.
LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN
5pe+c/sl Olprnples APRIL 9, 2011
Southern California benefiting
Special Olympics Southern California X
Please indicate leg(s) you will be running
Saturday, April 9
8:00 Kids -Off Ceremony at Morongo Band of Mission Indians Administration Building
8:30 N/B Pumarra to W/B Sullivan to N/B Mathews to W/B Morongo Rd to Potrero Rd. — 2 Miles
8:50 W/B Morongo Rd. to S/B Hathaway St. to Ramsey St. — 2.6 Miles
9:10 W/B Ramsey St. to Highland Springs Road — 5.1 Miles
10:10 W/B 6th St. to S/B Beaumont Ave. to California — 3 Miles
10:50 S/B SR -79 (Lamb Canyon) to Gilman Springs Rd. — 5.3 Miles
11:50 S/B Sanderson Ave. to Ramona Blvd. — 1.6 Miles
12:10 E/B Ramona Blvd. to San Jacinto St. to Main St. Ceremony at San 3acinto City Offices — 3.7
Miles
12:30 S/B San Jacinto St. to W/B Menlo — 2 Miles
1:00 W/B Menlo to S/B Buena Vista to Florida — 2.5 Miles
1:30 W/B Florida Ave. to S/B Sanderson St. to E/B Domenigoni Pkwy. — 4.3 Miles
2:00 E/B Domenigoni Pkwy. To S/B Searl Pkwy to Valley Wide Aquatic Center, Diamond Valley Lake —
1.8 Miles
2:30 BBQ, D7 & Closing at Valley Wide Aquatic Center, Diamond Valley Lake. Families and
Guests welcome to attend! BBQ tickets available $5.00 each.
NAME:
AGENCY:
Contact Number: E -mail Address:
WAIVER: ALL RUNNERS MUST READ THE FOLLOWING: I hereby release and hold harmless the sponsor, its officers
and employees, and Special Olympics, Inc., its officers and employees and all affiliated organizers of this event from any
claim for damages of any nature whatsoever, whether or not apparent, resulting from, or arising out of, any claimed
injury to myself resulting in any claim for damages that I, my administrators, my heirs or other representatives may
have. I HAVE READ THE ABOVE RELEASE AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT, AND FULLY UNDERSTAND IT.
Signature: Date:
$25 donation enclosed (includes BBQ &T-shirt)
T -SHIRT SIZE: M L XL XXL (Availab /e in mens sizes on /y.)
Make checks payable to: Special Olympics Southern California
For more information Contact: Abbey Leffler
PO Box 359
Sun City, CA 92584 — 0359
(951) 236 -7050
aleffier@)sosc.org
Yiou Me
Volunteer
Luncheon
2 A 0 . 11
Invited..
kTbl, nteers
=M00%-%
Ever
�dA� Hmes
i
Pfease join us for a
VolunteerCekbration,
When: Thursday - Aph(21, 2011
Time: 11: 00am -1: 00pm ; ato of geaUWKt
i Covu muw.itU .serV es Dept.
1320 Da l¢ va U.e1J, 7v r1emi
Where: Albert A. Chatigny Sr. geau.wvut, CA
y2223
Community Center i
1310 Oakvalley Parkway
Beaumont, CA 92223
i
?fosted By: City of Beaumont
Please R.S. V P.: 951- 769 -8539 1
i
i
Vorunteers!! ;
Everyday heroes. We hope you can attend i
i
F-11
,�C, .i"s-
M¢r¢'s YGwr c4amce to:
AOW 1► $¢ a Cta¢¢N of a Princess!!!
Z
1►
Ride im Parades ✓'�
w get imvoeved im yvar coomw4mity
IV Garm cosm"Jumity service Aol4rs
1► Be a part of sv "J¢tAimg that may Aeep yva
¢arm scweargAi p "lvmey Fvr coeeege!!!
,S `m mugs t w6 ide in 53eau n ont u4 6e en4 fed is foie 53eaum nt ScPeod Dli ftuct
f(a l3y: M&CUY Of l3
Y �t Meets �1�, 4praO4, 2O1.1
5.•30 PH & &w,,.-4Mv r4. Ch a&gny Sr. C
�zecreatco�ce��r
1310 0aklVa ey, PaAway
o8eaumont , GA 92223
OR
U
0
lie
.. o.. •
;T. �
o.
0
.o
Benefiting the
f="--
S m
Start at 550 E. 6th St
Beaumont CA
Pre - Register by 5/13/2011
Registration begins 6:30 a.m. day of rac
O
O
T- shirts provided to all runners
Top 3 finishers men's and women's overall 5k and 10k
EVE* �°
Pre - registered runners: $20 /5k - $25/10k
Race day registration: $30/5k - $35/10k
Senior citizens and children under 12yrs: $15/5k - $20/10k
Group Rate (new for 2011).- $60 for a group of 4 (pre- regboudon ONLY)
Each additional adult. $15 - savings of $5
do Each additional child. $10 - savings of $5
. • • �o Q `^ -mow .' 0
For more information or to register contact us at:
(951) 769 -8520 or breezinthroughbeaumont @ci.beaumont.ca.us
.�,c.J I,-)
Ewe
CLI
lt:em
N
N
O
MEMA
r
PRE -PAID ENTRY OF $25.00 MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN MAY 25, 2011- $30.00 DAY OF EVENT
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE: This form must be COMPLETELY filled out, and accompanied by check in order to be accepted.
Stewart Park
Detach form at dotted line and return to address shown below
Owners Name Phone ( )
Street Address. City 9th a Orange
State Zip Fax # ( )
Email Address Cell # { )
Make Model Year
I agree to hereby hold harmless the Cherry Fest Car and Motorcycle Show andr'or Kiwanis Club of Beaumont, City of Beaumont its volunteers and participants of the
Cherry Fest Car and Motorcycle Show from any claims. damage, injury or loss regarding the event. By signing below. I hereby agree to take full responsibility for myself,
my vehicle and my actions and 1 do not hold anyone helping with the show hrom and against all Liability of loss that participant and / or participants guest, including but not
limited to family and relatives, may sustain or incur as a result of claims, demands or judgment ansing from the participants involvement in the Cherry Fest Car and
Motorcycle Show.
Vehicle owners' personal insurance will cover vehicle and personal property before, during and after the event.
Signature Check # Amount $
Make checks payable to Beaumont Kiwanis and mail to: Beaumont Kiwanis
Additional TShirts $12 S -XL $15 XXL•XXXL Attn: Buzz Dopf
Quantity of Shirts Desired: 10466 Winesap Avenue
S M L XL XXL XXXL Cherry Valley, Ca 92223
Beaumont, California
Pre -paid entry
$25.00
(includes t- shirts and lunch)
Day of the Event-
$30.00
" Fri
City of Beaumont
Community Services Department
"...cherish tenderly the memories of our
heroic dead who made their breasts a barricade
between our country and its foes".
Major General John A. Logan
United States Army
May 30th, 1868
a
.C, 1.1
The City of Beaumont will honor and pay tribute to those service
members we have lost on the battle field and at home.
All public is welcome to join and observe the ceremony being held
at the Beaumont Civic Center at 550 E. 6th Street
on Monday, May 3 0th at I 1 am.
Do you have a loved one who served and has passe : ten? Y
honor them by placing their name on the Veteran Memorial af-the
Civic Center. It is required that they lived in either Beaumont or
Cherry Valley at the time of service or the time of death. You can
find an application at the Albert A. Chatigny Sr. Community
Recreation Center or download one from the
Beaumont City Website - www.ci.beaumont.ca.us
(Application due no later than May 6th)
Must show proof of death
MEMOR. AL DAB'"
MAY,OaSOTHv 2011
I 1:00AM
r r
�.c, �
the uforid is out!
Bud," SeaWsoii is s ib CM
the Beaumont pla"Rei
Family passes up to 6 peoples $130.00 (seasonal)
Single passes: io or lower $50.00 (seasonal)
11 or higher $65.00 (seasonal)
RENT THE POOL FOR AN EVENT.
AVAILABLE 6PM -10PM FRIDAY, SATURDAY & SUNDAY
PLEASE CALL: 951-769-8524 TO SCHEDULE A POOL PARTY!
F
Family passes up to 6 peoples $130.00 (seasonal)
Single passes: io or lower $50.00 (seasonal)
11 or higher $65.00 (seasonal)
RENT THE POOL FOR AN EVENT.
AVAILABLE 6PM -10PM FRIDAY, SATURDAY & SUNDAY
PLEASE CALL: 951-769-8524 TO SCHEDULE A POOL PARTY!
CI9
j .C-1�C
F BEAU] NIONT
'►ENT. '�E
0611 N G
Y°
jr.
Kemember to bring your lawn cn�
You can find the fief ut St��4X
Festivitsesgin at 5:OQ
Minutes
Beaumont City Council
Beaumont Redevelopment Agency
Beaumont Financing Authority
Beaumont Utility Authority
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California
City Council Workshop (4:00 p.m.)
Closed Session (5:00 p.m.)
Regular Session (6:00 p.m.)
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
REGULAR SESSION called to order at 6:00 p.m. Place: Room 5, Beaumont Civic Center
Roll Call: Mayor De Forge, Mayor Pro Tern Berg, Council Member Castaldo, Council
Member Fox, and Council Member Gall were present.
Invocation: Jerry Westholder - Highland Spring Fellowship
Pledge of Allegiance: Cub Scouts
Presentation: Riverside County Focal Point Presentation
Presentation: Pass EDA Presentation to Police and Fire
Adjustments to Agenda: None
Oral and Written Communication:
Patsy Reeley — Concerns with a few locations in the City with respect to street/signage -
N. Exit Solera on Brookside need reflectors or indication that there is an island /media
there, Brookside at the Sports Park street improvements to complete the partial
widening, Brookside between Cherry and Bellflower need attention, 1 -10 Exit on Oak
Valley Parkway (Calimesa) - no room to exit the freeway - maybe a three way stop is
needed, Cherry Valley Blvd. overpass needs more attention.
1. COUNCIL REPORTS (This is the portion of the agenda where the City Council will present updates
on city actions taken, committee assignments, and training and travel)
a) Mayor De Forge - Chamber Breakfast, Mormon Helping Hands will be doing projects in
the community, Story Time at Three Rings Ranch, Opening Ceremonies at Noble Creek,
Dedication of the Theater and Fine Arts Program at BHS
b) Mayor Pro Tem Berg - RCTC Update.
c) Council Member Castaldo - Chamber Breakfast, School Board Meeting, Grand Opening
of Theater and Fine Arts Program at BHS, Cal State Scholarships, Block Party for St.
Patrick's Day
d) Council Member Fox - Passing of Don Chance - Past Beaumont Police Chief from the
70's.
e) Council Member Gall - Wearing red in support of teachers who have been laid off
2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS
(City of Beaumont Core Values: Treat everyone right, Keep a customer service focus; Effective communication; Present
opportunity, Operate like a great business; Eliminate bureaucratic solutions; Embrace positive change)
a. Beaumont Charitable Foundation (made up of donations from citizens, employees and
contractors)
b. Community Information and Local Project Update
1) Financial Updates
a) February 2011 Update
b) Sales Tax Update
2) Beaumont Redevelopment Agency
a) Redevelopment Update
3) Sustainability
a) Beaumont Economic Update from John Husing
b) Market Place Update
C) Rule 20A Construction Notice from Edison
d) Dark Skies Update
e) Street Light Repair
f) Park Procedures Update
C. Calendar of Events
1) March 13, 2011 — Daylight Savings Time Change
2) March 18, 2011 — Boys in Blue Applebee's 5 -8pm
3) April 9, 2011 — Mardi Gras Event (fundraiser for MDA)
4) April 9, 2011 — Law Enforcement Torch Run
5) April 16 & 17, 2011 — Baker to Vegas (MDA Police Run)
6) April 30, 2011 — Horse Shoe Tournament/Chili Cookoff (fundraiser for MDA)
7) May 28, 2011 — Breezin' Through Beaumont
8) June 2, 3, 4 & 5, 2011 — Cherry Festival
9) 1" Wednesday of each Month — Beaumont Care Awareness Team
10) Second and Third Wednesday of Each Month — Story Time CafLS
d. Rumor Control, and Report on Oral and Written Communications
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
(This portion of the Agenda is for items that do not require a Public Hearing or discussion.)
a. Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only and publish by
summary
b. Approval of the Minutes of the City Council Meeting March 1, 2011
C. Approval of the Warrant List for March 15, 2011
d. Adoption of Ordinance No. 991 at its second reading — An Ordinance of the City Council
Amending Title 5 of the Beaumont Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 5.63 Regarding
Medical Cannabis Dispensaries.
e. Adoption of Ordinance No. 993 An Uncodified Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont, California, Adopting a Zone Change to Change the Zoning for a 0.14 Acre
Area of Land from Residential Single Family (R -SF) to Commercial General (CG) (11 -RZ-
01) Location: 630 Califomia Avenue (418- 083 -007)
f. Approval of Final Parcel Map No. 35895 Located at the Northeast Corner of California
Avenue and 1st Street — Baldi Bros.
g. Acceptance of Quitclaim Deed to Meritage Homes and KB homes to Relinquish City's
Interest for Lots in Seneca Springs.
h. Approval of Beaumont Foundation Request — Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch
Run Sponsorship
i. Approval of Beaumont Foundation Request — Don Messler (Run for the Wall)
Recommendation: Approval of the Consent Calendar as presented.
Motion by Council member Berg, Seconded by Council Member Berg to approve item
If as presented. Vote: 4/0/1 (Castaldo voted abstained due to property ownership in
close proximity to proposed project)
4. ACTION ITEMS /PUBLIC HEARING /REQUESTS (This portion of the Agenda is for
items that require a Public Hearing, discussion, and /or Council direction.)
a. Ordinance No. 972 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California
Requiring Payment of Development Impact Fees for Recycled Water Facilities, Appointing
Time and Place of a Public Meeting and of a Public Hearing and Directing Notice Thereof,
Describing Proposed Boundaries of Benefit Area.
Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 972 at its second reading by title only.
Mark Knorringa
Motion by Council Member Berg, Seconded by Council Member Fox to continue
Ordinance No. 972 for 90 days. Vote: 5/0
b. Ordinance No. 987 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City Of Beaumont Adding
Chapter 17.15 to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Beaumont Municipal Code to Prohibit the
Establishment and the Operation of Medical Cannabis Cooperatives and Collectives in the
City; or, in the Event a Ban is held Unlawful by the Judiciary, to Regulate the Establishment
of Cooperatives and Collectives.
Recommendation: Adoption of Ordinance No. 987 at its second reading by title only.
Staff Report was given by Alan Kapanicas
Motion by Council Member Berg, Seconded Fox to adopt Ordinance No. 987 at its
second reading. Vote: 4/1 (Council Member Gall voted no)
c. Ordinance No. 992 - Solicitation Ordinance Update
Recommendation: Open Public Hearing, Take Testimony, and Continue to the Regular City
Council Meeting of April 19, 2011.
Staff report was given by Chris Tracy, Staff Planner
Open Public Hearing 8:50 p.m.
Nancy Hall - Opposed
Mark Orozco - Neutral
Motion by Council Member Fox, Seconded by Council Member Berg to continue
the public hearing to the regular City Council Meeting of April 19, 2011 at approximately
6:00 p.m. Vote: 5/0
d. Specific Plan Amendment 10 -SP -03 and Amendment to Tentative Tract Map No.
33096 and Final Map 33096 for the Four Seasons Beaumont Project. Located at the
Southwest Intersection of East 1st Street and Highland Springs Avenue. Applicant:
K. Hovnanian
Recommendation: 1) Hold a Public Hearing; 2) Approve the amendment to the Four
Season Specific Plan 10- SP -03; 3) Approve the amendment of Tentative Tract Map No.
33096; and 4) Continue Final Map 33096 so that staff can work with applicant to obtain
the necessary bonding securities in place prior to the approval of Final Map.
Staff report was given by Chris Tracy, Staff Planner
Chris Courtney- Applicant Representative
Open Public Hearing 9:34 p.m.
No Speakers
Closed Public Hearing 9:44 p.m.
Motion by Council Member Berg, Seconded by Council Member Fox to approve as
presented. Vote: 5/0
e. Amended Energy and Water Conservation Agreement with Pardee Homes, Inc.
Recommendation: Approval of the Amended Agreement and Project Progress Report
and Authorize the Mayor to Execute the Agreement subject to the authority of the City
Attorney to make non - substantive changes.
Staff report was given by Kyle Warsinski, Staff Planner
Motion by Council Member Berg, Seconded by Council Member Gall to approve as
presented. Vote: 5/0
5. WORKSHOP
a. Budget
1) Contract Information (Requested at March 1, 2011 Meeting)
Council reviewed and directed that sufficient information has been provided. Council Members
suggested that Council will take the requested material and review it and if there are still
questions bring them back to the next meeting.
2) Decision Packages
a) Review
b) Prioritize
a4ofthe ty Coun cil M eting at 9:46 p.m.
I
Hian Kapfnicc
City Manager
74202 - 744424 Checks
EFT 540 -544 ACH
EFT 286 -312 Credit Card
WARRANT LIST
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 05, 2011
$1,156,432.94
$353,838.97
$22,088.60
Voids 074284, 074289, 074347, 074379
Payroll
PPE 03/03/11 $ 423,681.42
PPE 03/17/11 $ 399,237.44
Mutual of Omaha
PPE 03/03/11 $ 39,028.08
PPE 03/03/11 $ 335.88
Cal PERS
PPE 03/03/11 $ 112,228.71
AGENDA ITEM NO.
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THIS WARRANT LIST HAS BEEN COMPILED AND PREPARED TO MEET THE
DAILY OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2010 TO JUNE 30, 2011.
SIGNATURE: W �0 d, JAQ "1
TITLE: �• ^ ✓4ec 1t+r
N
1
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number
Check Date
Vendor Check Name
Amount
Description:
074202
03/11/2011
JARED RUTKOFF
1,381.36
CASH OUT
074203
03/11/2011
MAGDALENA FONSECA
162.80
ERROR IN PAYROLL
074204
03/11/2011
TASO TECH, INC
3,360.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074205
03/11/2011
ADVANCED WORKPLACE STRAT
280.00
ANNUAL DUES
074206
03/11/2011
ADVANTAGE REO
100.00
OVER PAYMENT
074207
03/11/2011
AIR & HOSE SOURCE
187.00
SUPPLIES
074208
03/11/2011
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
144.00
SERVICES
074209
03/11/2011
ARROWHEAD
117.36
CONTRACT SERVICES
074210
03/11/2011
AT &T MOBILITY SETTLEMENT FL
22,082.62
UUT
074211
03/11/2011
BASICGOV SYSTEMS, INC
23,314.00
SUBSCRIPTION
074212
03/11/2011
BDL ALARMS
96.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074213
03/11/2011
BEAUMONT - CHERRY VALLEY W,
3,611.94
UTILITIES
074214
03/11/2011
BEAUMONT LAWNMOWER
93.96
SERVICE
074215
03/11/2011
BEAUMONT POLICE OFFICERS F
1,950.00
DUES
074216
03/11/2011
C & A JANITORIAL SERVICES
2,969.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074217
03/11/2011
CALIFORNIA PEACE
600.00
DUES
074218
03/11/2011
CALIFORNIA LICENSED PHLEBO
640.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074219
03/11/2011
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF P
706.80
SERVICES
074220
03/11/2011
CINTAS CORPORATION #150
328.95
UNIFORM SERVICES
074221
03/11/2011
CITY OF BANNING
109.65
UTILITIES
074222
03/11/2011
COLONIAL LIFE AND
687.32
INSURANCE
074223
03/11/2011
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT SE
750.00
SPECIAL SUPPLIES
074224
03/11/2011
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DI
367.63
SUPPLIES
074225
03/11/2011
CREATIVE BUS SALES, INC
1,121.80
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
074226
03/11/2011
DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATE:
15,000.00
PROFESSIONAL FEES
074227
03/11/2011
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
105.00
SERVICES
074228
03/11/2011
EVIDENT
315.50
SERVICES/ SUPPLIES
074229
03/11/2011
FOX OCCUPATIONAL
25.00
CONTACT SERVICES
074230
03/11/2011
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
7,875.79
CONTRACT SERVICES
074231
03/11/2011
JUAN C GOMEZ
598.00
CASE ADD.
074232
03/11/2011
GOTHIC GROUNDS MANAGEMEI'
5,595.00
MONTHLY FEE
074233
03/11/2011
GOVPARTNER
500.00
SERVICES
074234
03/11/2011
HOME DEPOT /CREDIT SERVICE;
798.93
SUPPLIES
074235
03/11/2011
HUNTINGTON COURT REPORTEI
377.00
SERVICES
074236
03/11/2011
INTERSTATE FIRE
274.50
SERVICE
074237
03/11/2011
JDL DESIGN
13,506.16
SERVICES
Printed 03/28/2011 10:25:43AM Page 1 of 6
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number Check Date Vendor Check Name Amount Description:
074238
03/11/2011
JOE A.GONSALVES & SON
3,180.00
SERVICES
074239
03/11/2011
JP STRIPING
300.00
SERVICE
074240
03/11/2011
LOS ANGELES COUNTY AUDITOI
996.00
SERVICES
074241
03/11/2011
LSI TITLE COMPANY
171.17
REIMB FOR OVER PMT
074242
03/11/2011
M3K BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
487.36
SERVICES
074243
03/11/2011
MATICH CORPORATION
1,220.95
SUPPLIES
074244
03/11/2011
MOSS,LEVY & HARTZHEIM
3,000.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074245
03/11/2011
NAPA AUTO PARTS
139.21
VEHICLE SUPPLIES
074246
03/11/2011
NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION REN
222.63
RENTAL SERVICE
074247
03/11/2011
NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA INC
4,184.00
MONTHLY SERVICE
074248
03/11/2011
PACIFIC ALARM SERVICE
350.50
ALARM SERVICE
074249
03/11/2011
PADGETT'S CLEANING
2,855.53
SERVICES
074250
03/11/2011
POMA AUTOMOTIVE FUELING IN
3,583.29
FUEL
074251
03/11/2011
LESLIE DORTICOS
60.00
REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE FEE
074252
03/11/2011
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS, INC
764.82
SUPPLIES
074253
03111/2011
PRE -PAID LEGAL
920.45
LEGAL SERVICES
074254
03/11/2011
PROFORMA
1,220.00
SUPPLIES
074255
03/11/2011
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
366.18
UNIFORM SERVICE
074256
03/11/2011
QUILL CORPORATON
278.97
SUPPLIES
074257
03/11/2011
RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIAL
49.92
SUPPLIES
074258
03/11/2011
RIV.CO.FLOOD CONTROL DIST
13,211.52
COST SHARE
074259
03/11/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDEF
3,211.00
SERVICES
074260
03/11/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S
100.00
TRAINING
074261
03/11/2011
S.A MOBIL CARWASH AND DETA
960.00
CAR WASH SERVICE
074262
03/11/2011
SAN BERNARDINO CO.SHERIFF
313.50
TRAINING
074263
03/11/2011
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATE£
1,239.74
SERVICES
074264
03/11/2011
SGP DESIGN AND PRINT
213.00
SPECIAL SUPPLIES
074265
03/11/2011
SKILL PATH SEMINAR
269.00
TRAINING
074266
03/11/2011
SOUTHERN CALIF.EDISON
8,212.06
UTILITIES
074267
03/11/2011
SPOHN RANCH, INC
3,543.14
SERVICES
074268
03/11/2011
SPRINT
1,679.65
PHONE SERVICE
074269
03/11/2011
STANCIL CORPORATION
19,780.00
SERVICES & TRAINING
074270
03/11/2011
STAR AUTO PARTS
5.90
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
074271
03/11/2011
SUN BADGE CO.
107.00
SUPPLIES
074272
03111/2011
THE PRESS - ENTERPRISE
162.80
ADVERTISING
074273
03/11/2011
THE RECORD GAZETTE
42.00
ADVERTISING
074274
03/11/2011
TITAN ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIO
500.00
SERVICES
Printed 03/28/2011 10:25:44AM Page 2 of 6
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number Check Date Vendor Check Name Amount Description:
074275
03/11/2011
TLMA ADMINISTRATION
581.05
SERVICES
074276
03/11/2011
TULE RANCH /MAGAN FARMS
23,070.38
SERVICES
074277
03/11/2011
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALER'
260.00
SERVICES
074278
03/11/2011
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
17,927.62
SERVICES
074279
03/11/2011
UNITED WAY OF THE
81.00
DONATION
074280
03/11/2011
UTILITY PARTNERS
57,350.00
SERVICES
074281
03/11/2011
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
779.43
PHONE SERVICE
074282
03/11/2011
VERIZON WIRELESS
5,208.25
PHONE SERVICE
074283
03/11/2011
VERIZON
54.36
PHONE SERVICE
074285
03/18/2011
GREENFEAT
4,250.00
SERVICES
074286
03/18/2011
AIREZE OF THE DESERT
210.00
SUPPLIES
074287
03/18/2011
ACCESS 2 SAVINGS
45.02
SERVICES
074288
03/18/2011
ARROWHEAD
28.26
WATER
074290
03/18/2011
BEAUMONT CHAMBER
1,000.00
MONTHLY CHAMBER
074291
03/18/2011
BEAUMONT MOTORCYCLES, LLC
660.75
VEHICLE SUPPLIES
074292
03/18/2011
LORI BUSHNELL
5,891.00
SETTLEMENT
074293
03/18/2011
C & A JANITORIAL SERVICES
1,711.20
SERVICES
074294
03/18/2011
CALIFORNIA PEACE
200.00
ANNUAL PREMIUm
074295
03/18/2011
ONTRAC
3.36
SHIPPING
074296
03/18/2011
CDW GOVERNMENT, INC.
1,999.30
EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCHASING
074297
03/18/2011
CGLIC- CHATTANOOGA EASC
100,129.09
HEALTH INSURANCE
074298
03/18/2011
CINTAS CORPORATION #150
136.58
SERVICES
074299
03/18/2011
COLONIAL LIFE AND
343.66
INSURANCE
074300
03/18/2011
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
885.00
SERVICES
074301
03/18/2011
CR &R INC.
4,712.00
SERVICES
074302
03/18/2011
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
140.00
SERVICES
074303
03/18/2011
DOOLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.
2,317.00
SUPPLIES
074304
03/18/2011
ECONOMICS & POLITICS, INC
2,083.33
SERVICES
074305
03/18/2011
ELITE COMPANIES US, INC.
29,858.40
CONTRAT SERVICES
074306
03/18/2011
FIRST STREET S TORAGE
537.30
STORAGE
074307
03/18/2011
FOUR CORNERS GLASS
652.50
SERVICES
074308
03/18/2011
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
7,778.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074309
03/18/2011
HEARD'S INVESTIGATIONS
150.00
SERVICES
074310
03/18/2011
HUNTINGTON COURT REPORTEI
895.62
SERVICES
074311
03/18/2011
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL
160.50
HANDBOOK
074312
03/18/2011
ITT WATER & WASTEWATER
3,514.00
SERVICES
074313
03/18/2011
LEXISNEXIS EXPRESS SCREENII
13.00
SERVCES
Printed 03/28/2011 10:25:44AM Page 3 of 6
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number Check Date Vendor Check Name Amount Description:
074314
03/18/2011
DARCI MULVIHILL
59.90
REFUND
074315
03/18/2011
NATURES IMAGE, INC
4,341.07
SERVICES
074316
03/18/2011
NEXTEL
739.49
PHONE SERVICES
074317
03/18/2011
LESLIE DORTICOS
30.00
ADMIN REFUND
074318
03/18/2011
PRINTING & PROMOTION PLUS,
499.55
OFFICE SUPPLIES
074319
03/18/2011
QUALITY PLUMBING, INC.
200.00
SERVICES
074320
03/18/2011
QUILL CORPORATON
644.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES
074321
03/18/2011
RAMONA HUMANE SOCIRTY INC
5,902.86
SERVICES
074322
03/18/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S
288.51
YOUTH COURT
074323
03/18/2011
ROMBERG TREE SERVICE
550.00
SERVICES
074324
03/18/2011
R S I S, INC.
2,115.20
SERVICES & SUPPLIES
074325
03/18/2011
SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATI(
1,272.14
SERVICES
074326
03/18/2011
SIRCHIE
265.21
SUPPLIES
074327
03/18/2011
STAGECOACH TOWING
453.00
SERVICE
074328
03/18/2011
TELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATION;
847.44
PHONE SERVICE
074329
03/18/2011
TYLER WORKS
50.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074330
03/18/2011
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
1,952.35
PHONE SERVICE
074331
03/18/2011
VERIZON
24.53
PHONE SERVICE
074332
03/18/2011
JAMES WALLIS
150.00
REFUND
074333
03/18/2011
THOMSON -WEST
175.00
SERVICES
074334
03/18/2011
FRANCIS COE
91.50
PER DIEM
074335
03/18/2011
TASO TECH, INC
4,244.04
CONTRACT SERVICES
074336
03/22/2011
JEFFREY FOX
250.00
ADVANCE
074337
03/25/2011
OMAR TORRES
811.21
PAYROLL
074338
03/25/2011
MARK KEYSER
10,000.00
LOAN
074339
03/25/2011
ASHLEY THOMPSON
117.38
REFUND ON PURCHASE
074340
03/25/2011
ADVANCED WORKPLACE STRAT
239.00
SERVICES
074341
03/25/2011
ADVANTAGE LANDSCAPE
900.00
SERVICES
074342
03/25/2011
ALLWAYS AIR AVIATION
283.39
SERVICES
074343
03/25/2011
ALTA OFFICE SERVICES
198.55
SUPPLIES
074344
03/25/2011
AMSOIL INC.
1,647.71
SUPPLIES
074345
03/25/2011
ARROWHEAD SCIENTIFIC INC
392.64
SERVICES
074346
03/25/2011
BANNING VETERINARY HOSPITP
79.00
VET SERVICE
074348
03/25/2011
BEAUMONT LAWNMOWER
309.51
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
074349
03/25/2011
BEDON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
1,480.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074350
03/25/2011
BIO -TOX LABORTORIES
192.00
SERVICE
074351
03/25/2011
BRIAN'S LIVE BEE REMOVAL SEI
200.00
SERVICES
Printed 03/28/2011 10:25:44AM Page 4 of 6
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number
Check Date
Vendor Check Name
Amount
Description:
074352
03/25/2011
C & A JANITORIAL SERVICES
3,384.00
JANITORIAL SERVICES
074353
03/25/2011
CD PROPERTY SERVICES
165.00
SERVICES
074354
03/25/2011
CHERRY VALLEY NURSERY
752.47
GROUNDS SUPPLIES
074355
03125/2011
CINTAS CORPORATION #150
833.26
UNIFORM SERVICE
074356
03/25/2011
CITY OF BANNING
2,158.00
ANIMAL SERVICES
074357
03/25/2011
CITY OF CALIMESA
462.00
ANIMAL CARE
074358
03/25/2011
COAST TO COAST FINANCIAL S(
11.31
NEW PAPER
074359
03/25/2011
COMSERCO COMMUNICATIONS
11,442.91
COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES
074360
03/25/2011
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DI
1,028.34
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
074361
03/25/2011
CORONA CLAY CO.
2,325.00
SUPPLIES
074362
03/25/2011
CUSTOM TROPHIES
265.35
SERVICES
074363
03/25/2011
DANIELS TIRE SERVICE
1,477.44
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
074364
03/25/2011
DC FROST ASSOCIATES, INC
23,654.50
SUPPLIES
074365
03/25/2011
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
1,076.00
SERVICES
074366
03/25/2011
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIORNMEN'
2,297.29
SERVICES
074367
03/25/2011
DIRECTV
86.99
TV SERVICE
074368
03/25/2011
DOOLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.
202.74
SALES TAX
074369
03/25/2011
E.S.BAB000K & SONS, INC.
28,248.41
SERVICES
074370
03/25/2011
EVANS- HYDRO, INC
12,595.00
PARTS AND SERVICE
074371
03/25/2011
EVENT SERVICES
404.00
SERVICES
074372
03/25/2011
FEDEX
74.68
SHIPPING
074373
03/25/2011
KRISTIN FIELDER
40.00
DEPOSIT REFUND
074374
03/25/2011
GALLADE CHEMICALJNC.
676.50
SUPPLIES
074375
03/25/2011
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
3,293.00
CONTRACT
074376
03/25/2011
GOTHIC GROUNDS MANAGEMEP
5,330.00
SERVICES
074377
03/25/2011
GPS INTERNATIONAL
632.40
SERVICES
074378
03/25/2011
HI -WAY SAFETY INC
839.73
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
074380
03/25/2011
HOME DEPOT /CREDIT SERVICE:
987.71
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
074381
03/25/2011
INDUSTRIAL CHEM LABS
1,417.11
SUPPLIES
074382
03/25/2011
IN GEAR TECHNOLOGY
720.47
SUPPLIES
074383
03/25/2011
INVESTORS TITLE COMPANY
82.50
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
074384
03/25/2011
JDL DESIGN
31,529.00
SUPPLIES
074385
03/25/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION -Lc
100.00
DUES
074386
03/25/2011
LEXISNEXIS
229.50
SERVICES
074387
03/25/2011
LUTHER'S TRUCK
1,376.81
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
074388
03/25/2011
MORITZ EMBROIDERY WORKS
1,524.58
SERVICES
074389
03/25/2011
NAPA AUTO PARTS
271.79
VEHICLE SUPPLIES
Printed 03/28/2011 10:25:44AM Page 5 of 6
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number
Check Date
Vendor Check Name
Amount
Description:
074390
03/25/2011
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
437.09
PHONE SERVICE
074391
03/25/2011
PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS
1,566.18
SERVICE
074392
03/25/2011
PARCEL QUEST
525.00
SUBSCRIPTION
074393
03/25/2011
PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC.
1,116.72
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
074394
03/2512011
PAYCHEX HUMAN RESOURCES •
420.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074395
03/25/2011
POLYDYNE, INC.
2,300.00
SUPPLIES
074396
03/25/2011
POMA AUTOMOTIVE FUELING IN
4,594.90
FUEL
074397
03/25/2011
PRO -PIPE & SUPPLY
290.03
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
074398
03/25/2011
PROFORMA
71.60
SUPPLIES
074399
03/25/2011
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
122.06
UNIFORM SERVICE
074400
03/25/2011
QUALITY PLUMBING, INC.
1,057.00
SERVICES
074401
03/25/2011
QUILL CORPORATON
264.98
SUPPLIES
074402
03/25/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY INFORMATI
112.56
SERVICES
074403
03/25/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S
827.52
TRAINING
074404
03/25/2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S
288.51
YOUTH COURT
074405
03/25/2011
RODRIGO PENA PHOTOGRAPHY
2,006.25
PHOTOGRAPHY
074406
03/25/2011
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATE:
180.12
SERVICES
074407
03/25/2011
SOUTHERN CALIF.EDISON
28,853.87
UTILITIES
074408
03/25/2011
STATEWIDE TOWING
772.00
TOWING SERVICES
074409
03/25/2011
SUN BADGE CO.
107.00
SUPPLIES
074410
03/25/2011
TASER INTERNATIONAL
550.00
SUPPLIES
074411
03/25/2011
TELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATION:
4,509.16
SERVICES
074412
03/25/2011
THE GAS COMPANY
2,384.91
UTILITIES
074413
03/25/2011
THE RECORD GAZETTE
76.93
ADVERTISING
074414
03/25/2011
URBAN OASIS
10,925.00
SERVICES
074415
03/25/2011
UTILITY PARTNERS
2,076.62
SERVICES
074416
03/25/2011
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
1,203.39
PHONE SERVICE
074417
03/25/2011
WAL -MART COMMUNITY
1,119.04
SUPPLIES
074418
03/25/2011
WILDERMUTH ENVIRONMENTAL
12,690.43
SERVICES
074419
03/25/2011
WRIGHT SEPTIC
1,200.00
SERVICES
074420
03/25/2011
TASO TECH, INC
3,360.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
074421
03/25/2011
THE M & M GROUP
30,000.00
CRY FESTICAL ENTERTAINMENT
074422
03/25/2011
LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING
392,699.00
SERVICES
074423
03/25/2011
DIAMOND HILLS AUTO GROUP
31.14
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
074424
03125/2011
HIGHLAND SPRINGS EXPRESS L
49.99
VEHICLE SUPPLIES
1,156,432.94
Printed 03/28/2011 10:25:44AM Page 6 of 6
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number
Check Date
Vendor Check Name
Amount
Description:
EFT000540
03/10/2011
STEVE MOORE COMMUNICATIOI
2,837.50
CONTRACT SERVICES
EFT000541
03/10/2011
URBAN LOGIC CONSULTANTS
341,863.09
CONTRACT SERVICES
EFT000542
03/18/2011
BEAUMONT ELECTRIC INC.
6,123.38
SERVICES
EFT000543
03/24/2011
R.MOODY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
1,440.00
SERVICES
EFT000544
03/24/2011
STEVE MOORE COMMUNICATIOI
1,575.00
SERVICES
353,838.97
Printed 03/28/2011 10:26:06AM Page 1 of 1
City of Beaumont
Vendor Check Register
Check Number Check Date Vendor Check Name Amount Description:
EFT000000O00286
03/10/2011
A -Z BUS SALES,INC.
2,350.52
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00287
03/10/2011
ALL PURPOSE RENTALS
523.12
RENTALS
EFT000000O00288
03/10/2011
ARAMARK
102.00
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00289
03/10/2011
BEAUMONT TIRE
246.75
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00290
03/10/2011
BEAUMONT ACE HOME CENTER
123.67
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00291
03/10/2011
CHERRY VALLEY AUTOMATIVE
2,250.98
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00292
03/10/2011
GOPHER PATROL
2,867.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
EFT000000O00293
03/10/2011
HIGH TECH IRRIGATION,INC.
82.86
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00294
03/10/2011
SHRED -IT
187.00
CONTRACT SERICES
EFT000000O00295
03/10/2011
XEROX CORPORATION
1,450.38
CONTRACT SERVICES
EFT000000O00296
03/18/2011
A & A FENCE
118.00
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00297
03/18/2011
A -Z BUS SALES,INC.
216.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00298
03/18/2011
ARAMARK
444.35
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00299
03/18/2011
BEAUMONT TIRE
100.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00300
03/18/2011
BEAUMONT ACE HOME CENTER
60.62
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00301
03/18/2011
CHERRY VALLEY AUTOMATIVE
79.90
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00302
03/25/2011
A -Z BUS SALES,INC.
911.24
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00303
03/25/2011
ALL PURPOSE RENTALS
1,399.33
RENTAL SERVICE
EFT000000O00304
03/25/2011
ARAMARK
74.85
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00305
03/25/2011
BEAUMONT TIRE
46.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00306
03/25/2011
BEAUMONT ACE HOME CENTER
580.19
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00307
03/25/2011
BEAUMONT SAFE & LOCK
223.53
LOCKSMITH
EFT000000O00308
03/25/2011
CHERRY VALLEY AUTOMATIVE
1,921.20
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EFT000000O00309
03/25/2011
GORM, INC.
1,010.91
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00310
03/25/2011
HIGH TECH IRRIGATION,INC.
74.07
SUPPLIES
EFT000000O00311
03/25/2011
PITNEY BOWES
2,991.39
SERVICE
EFT000000O00312
03/25/2011
XEROX CORPORATION
1,652.74
SERVICE
22,088.60
Printed 03/28/2011 10:25:20AM Page 1 of 1
Agenda Item
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Robert Sherwood, Community Services Department
SUBJECT: Guard Rail on Elm Street
DATE: April 1, 4, 2011
***************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
BACKGROUND:
A resident that was concerned brought this to the attention of the City Council on March 1, 2011.
There is no guard railing on Elm Street North bound from California Ave to the wash area.
Residents are asking for assistance that live on the west side of Elm Street.
ANALYSIS:
The Community Services Department would like the City of Beaumont to purchase and install
railing for the amount of $14,100.00. Three bids were received and KAD Equipment was the
lowest bid. Funds would come out of the general fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council awards the ' stall of the railing.
Robert Sherwood
Director of Community Services
W1ti
KAD PAVING COMPANY DBA KAD
ENGINEERING
12173 10TH STREET Phone: (909) 790 -3366
YUCAIPA, CA 92399 Cell #: (909)721 -1020
GEN. CONTRACTORS" A" LIC R 937845 & C -12 Fax: (909) 790 -3369
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO:
ROB OWEN
PHONE:
FAX:
CONTRACT /PROPOSAL
WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
ATT: ROB Date: 03/01/2011
KAD Paving Company will provide all materials, perform all labor, and supply all equipment for the completion of the project(s)
specified below. KAD Paving Company guarantees the usage of all materials specified within the contents of this contract/proposal.
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
QTY
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
1
TRAFFIC CONTROL
MS
$500.00
$500.00
2
INSTALL 200 FEET OF CALTRANS TYPE
GUARD RAIL
200 FT
$68.00
$13,600.00
TOTAL
$14,100.00
NOTE: INCLUEDES ALL HARDWARE CONCRETE FOOTING BACKFILLED, AND
REFLECTIVE TAPE
EXCLUSIONS: BONDS, FEES, ASSESSMENTS, PERMITS ,SURVEY,ENGINEERING,HAZARDOUS
MA I hKIAL HAN DL1N U Or AN Y KIN ll,KEMU V L /KI;YLAUL /FELUUA I L IN I hKV LK1N (i U I ILIES, WA I hK SOU KCE.
Acceptance of Proposal
The above work to be performed in accordance with drawings and the specifications submitted for
The above work and complete in a workmanlike manner for the sum of: FOURTEEN THOUSAND ONE
HUNDREDDOLLARS AND NO CENTS
With Davments to be made as follows: Upon Comaletion
Any alteration or deviation from the specifications provided herein, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an additional charge over and
Above the estimate(s) provided in this document. Buyer agrees to pay all court costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the event of default or if this Contract is
submitted to an attorney for enforcement purposes. Owner renders Contractor harmless and agrees to relieve Contractor of all liability for any unsatisfactory
Results in the event that the Owner shall require Contractor to lay asphalt on sub - grade, which in the opinion of the Contractor, in unsatisfactory. Contractor
is not responsible for damage to underground utilities or lines unless such utilities or lines have been properly staked in advance of operations. Damage cause
by others to seal -coat, striping and surrounding area after back -fill seal -coat has been applied is the sole responsibility of Owner and Owner accepts full liability
for such damage. Contractor is not responsible for back -fill, compaction of back -fill installed by others, reflective cracking on surface areas, and pre- existing
engineering in respect to drainage. Owner accepts full liability for the aforementioned. All engineering, testing, inspection, and permit fees have been excludec
from the contents of this contract and shall be deemed as collateral to contents of this Contract. This proposal shall expire in 60 days.. Payment is due at
completion of work. Interest will accrue @ 10% plus costs daily after 30 days*****. Material costs are only valid for 30 days from date of this proposal .
Upon acceptance of bid, please complete the following information (per section 3097 California Civil Code Procedure). Sign and return one copy.
Owner:
Address:
Construction Lender:
Address:
General Contractor:
Address:
Print Name:
Signature:
Submitted By: Donnie Wheeler Jr.
By: Donnie Wheeler Jr.
1- Mar -11
Original Copy O ace
14001
03/25/2011 15:44 FAX
TYNER PAVING COMPANY
1696 W. Second Street • Pomona, CA 91766
Tei: (909) 665 -7283 • Fax: (909) 866 -0161 • License No. 676195 Class A. C -12
PROPOSAL
To: City of Beaumont Date: 3 -23-11
Address: Project: Gaurdrail & Backfilt Project
Elm St Slof Oak Valley
Attention: Rob Phone: Fax:
the
Job Description: BackfQ gas line trench
1. Provide traffic control and flagmen for duration of project.
2. Instal) Cal Trans type standard metal guard railing, approx. 200 L.F.
3. Install type SRT ends per Cal Trans standard.
Quote based on one move.
Total = $14,980.00
TOTAL PRICE: ESTWTOR: Craig Thomas
Exclusions: Permits, testing, inspections, subgrade recompaction and engineering.
IMPORTANT CONDITIONS-TERMS. UNLESS SPECIFIED TO THE CONTRARY ABOVE, NET CASE TO BE PAID ON
COMPLETION OF JOB, AS DEFINED IN CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE S 3088.
TYNER PAVING COMPANY shall not be liable for any damage to or breakage of underground pipes and/or conduits not
vielbls from the surface of the gourd nor for any damage an approaches pneluding sidewalk) from street to property line.
• 1. No guarantee of drainage on re- surfacing jobs unless otherwise specked in the above contract
2. No guarantee of regrowth of veget000n on re- surfacing jobs unless otherwise specified in the above contract
- 3. No guarantee on cracking on re- surface jobs uniesa otherwise specified to tine above contract
4. No guarantee on patch or seal project. or craddrg, vegetation or surface finish.
• 5. Price good for 3D days from dale of proposal unless othervAss noted above.
Accepted by- Date:
Proposal must be signed and ratumed to Tyner Paving Company before work can commence.
work can eommenee.
proposal must be signed and returned to Tyner Paving Campeny before
0
DUST CONTROL INC.
22904 BANBURY CT
MURRWrA, CA 92562
CSL #967746 951- 760 -5375
Esti mats.
Date
Estimate #
3/2312011
I BMNT323
Name I Address
CRY OF BEAUMONT
550 E. SIXTH ST
BEAUMONT, CA 92223
Project
Description
Qiy
Rate
Tots)
3/M I
ELM STREET GUARD RAIL
METAL BEAM GUARD RAIL BARRICADE PLACED APROX
20OLF ALONG ELM STREET
200
72.5D
14,500.00
GUARD RAIL INSTALLED
PRICE INCLUDES LABOR EQUIP MATERIAL TRAFFIC
CONTROL MOVE ON/OFF
THANK YOU
BOB
951- 249 -6092
Total SI4,=100
KAD PAVING COMPANY D BA KAD
ENGINEERING
Phone: (909) 790,3366
1711310TH STREET Cell tf: (909)721 -1020
YUCAIPA, CA 92399 Fax: (909) 790.3369
GEN. CONTRACTORS" A" LfC # 937845 & C -12
CONTRACT/PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT:
ROB OWEN CITY OF BEAUMONT
PHONE: FAX: ATT: ROB Date: 03ro1n011
rr�r
KAD Paving Company will provide all materiels, perform all latxar, and supply all equ�ment for the completion of the pfgecx(s)
spec ifiad below. KAD EEftCompany guarantees the us of all materials ec specified within the contents of this contract/
ITEM # DESCRIPTION Ty UNIT PRICE I TOTA]
I TRAFFIC CONTROL 1LS $500.00 $500.00
2 INSTALL 200 FEET OF CALTRANS TYPE 200 FT $68.00 $13,600.00
GUARD RAIL
TOTAL S14,11110-00
NOTE: INCLUEDES ALL HARDWARE CONCRETE FOOTING BACKFILLED, AND
REFLECTIVE TAPE
vex.rc*r-re DGUKATTC C1 IRVF.V- ENGINEER NG,HAZARDOUS
LAI. W- 3LW1,10; DVl�voya ua.Vy�++.+w... ----. - - —a- -- - WATER
MATERIAL HANDLING OF ANY KIND,REMOVE/REPLACE/RELOCATEINTERFERING UTILIES,
AccVtunce O Proposal
The above work to be performed in accordance with drawings and the specifiestions submitted for
The above work and complete in a workmanlike manner for the sum of: FOURTEEN THOUSAND ONE
HUNDREDDOLLARS AND NO CENTS
With payments to be made as follows: Upon Completion
and
itract
Above the estimates) provided in tins aoc urnem. ouyw bytes— Lv r+or r of all liability
submitted to an attomey for enforcement purposes• o'er readers Contractor harmless -and agrees to _felieve Contracto
for any unaetisfa
Results in the event that the Owner shall require Contractor to lay asphalt on sub - grade, which in the opinion of the Contractor, in unsatisfactory. Contractor
is not responsible for deanage to underground utilities or fines unless such utilities or lines have been property staked in advance of OperatiOnli- Damage eauf
by others to seal cost striping and surrounding area alter back�0l seal-coat has been applied is the sole respansibifity of owner and owner Woepls full liOWO
for such damage. Contractor is -not responsible for bade -lilt, compaction of back -fill +nstalled by others. reflective cracking on surface areas. and Are-exis4in9
engineering in respect to drainage. owner accepts full liability for the aforementioned. All engineering, testing, inspection, and permit fees hg ve been exclude
from the Contents ofthis contract and shall be deemed as oolateral to contents of this Contract. This proposal shall expire in-60 days.. PsyrrAnt is due at
completion of work. interest will accxue (@ 10% plus costs daily after 30 days— .Material costs are only valid for 30 days from date of this proposal .
Upon acceptance of bid, please complete the following information (per section 3097 California Civil Code Procedure). Sign and return are copy.
Owner:
Address:
Construction Lender:
Address:
General Contractor:
Address:
Print Name:
Signature:
Eg-Mar- d Bv: Donnic Wheeler.) r.
nie 1Nbeeler Ir.
1
Co U ce
STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 1�)
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: City Manager
DATE: April 5, 2011
SUBJECT: Change Order for Street Repair Work at Oak Valley Parkway and Interstate 10
Background and Analysis:
On October 19, 2010, the City Council awarded a contract to Mamco Inc. to complete
street repairs on Oak Valley Parkway near the I -10 interchange. The work included repair work
for a raised median, a section of asphalt overlay, along with a section of curb, gutter and storm
drain to improve drainage in the westbound lanes of Oak Valley Parkway just west of Golf Club
Drive. The proposed change order would accommodate additional quantities for those repairs
based on field conditions where more asphalt and concrete work was required ($12,788.84), the
addition of 5 stop signs along with thermal plastic striping and pavement markers needed to
create a controlled intersection at the intersection of Oak Valley Parkway and the Interstate 10
off ramps as per Caltrans requirements ($12,121.30) and additional "feathering" and cold
planning of the travel lanes to make the ride as smooth as possible through the repaired road
section ($5,501.21). The proposed change order would add $30,411.35 to the original authorized
contract amount which brings the total cost of the project to $75,916.35. The project is being
funded from Transportation Funds.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed change order and Project Progress
Report, and AUTHORIZATION of the Mayor to execute the change order.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR'S CHANGE ORDER
(Project Title: Oak Valley Parkway/ I -10 Intersection)
CHANGE ORDER NO.: 1
CHANGE ORDER DATE: April 5, 2011
CONTRACT DATE: October 19, 2010
CONTRACTOR: Name: Mamco Inc.
Address: 16810, Van Buren Blvd. # 200
Riverside, CA 92504
Telephone: (951) 776 9300
Fax: (951) 776 0404
THIS CHANGE ORDER is issued pursuant to that certain Agreement for Services by
Independent Contractor between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ( "OWNER ") and MAMCO INC.
( "CONTRACTOR ") dated October 19, 2010 (the "AGREEMENT ").
1. Chanyze to be Performed. CONTRACTOR shall provide all labor, materials and
equipment to perform the following change (choose and check one):
See Exhibit "A ", attached hereto
_X_ Description of Change: Additional quantities, additional work to plane down a patch and
additional striping requirement for the stop signs
Total Change order Amount of $ 30,411.35
2. Time of Performance. Time is of the essence. Therefore, CONTRACTOR shall
begin work within 5 days of the date this Change Order is signed by the OWNER and shall
complete performance of such services within 120 working days.
3. Liaison of OWNER. Mr. Rob Owen shall serve as liaison between OWNER and
CONTRACTOR.
4. Staff Assignments. CONTRACTOR will assign the following personnel to
perform the services required by this Change Order: (Check if this Paragraph 4 Not Applicable:
Page 1 of 2
5. Deliverables. CONTRACTOR shall deliver to OWNER not later than the date or
dates indicated, the following: (Check if this Paragraph 5 Not Applicable:
6. Compensation. For all services rendered by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this
Change Order, CONTRACTOR shall receive a sum of $ 30,411.35 payable as follows: progress
payments less 10% retention until job completion.
7. Reimbursable Expenses. In addition to the compensation provided for in
Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR (choose and check one:) _ shall/ _X_ shall not/be
entitled to reimbursement for expenses. If authorized by this Change Order, reimbursable
expenses shall be limited to:
8. Miscellaneous Matters. The following additional matters are made a part of this
Change Order (choose and check one):
X_ Not applicable
See Exhibit "A ", attached hereto; or
Description:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Change Order on the date
indicated below.
Dated:
Dated: 31Z 9J1
CITY OF BEAUMONT
an
CONTRACTOR:
MAMCO INC.
Print Nome
Title
Page 2 of 2
City of Beaumont
Q CHANGE ORDER & TASK ORDER AUTHORIZATION REQUEST
Existing Public Works Contracts
NAME OF PROJECT: OVP/ I -10 Intersection
FUNDING SOURCE: Transportation Funds
CONTRACTOR: Mamco Inc.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 01
1. TYPE OF CHANGE ORDER (check one):
2. AMOUNT OF CHANGE ORDER: $ 30,411.35
PROJECT N0.
(internal use)
CONTRACT DATE: 10 -19 -2010
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ 45,505.00
ADDITIVE D DEDUCTIVE
3. REASON FOR CHANGE ORDER: Additional quantities, additional work to plane down a patch and
additional striping requirement for the stop signs.
4. WHO MUST AUTHORIZE:
City Manager:
a. For contracts of $50,000 dollars or less, a change or cumulative change shall not exceed the total of
$5,000.00 dollars.
b. For contracts of more than $50,000.00 but less than $250,000.00, a change or cumulative changes shall
not exceed a total of 10% or the original contract amount.
c. For contracts of $250,000.00 or more, a change order or cumulative change orders shall not exceed
$25,000.00 plus 2% of the original contract in excess of $250,000.00.
x City Council: for change orders which exceed the City Manager's authority.
TASK ORDER NO.
1. DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
2. AMOUNT OF TASK ORDER: $
3. QUALIFIED TASK (check one): YES NO
- ,. -
4. UNIT PRICING CONFORMS TO CONTRACT (check one): i � YES i I, NO
I have reviewed and prepared this change order / task order request in accordance with Beaumont Municipal Code:
Title 3 — Section 3.02.
Public Works Director
City Attorney:
AUTHORIZATION
Date:
Date:
City Manager: Date:
Mayor (as applies): Date:
Change Order
CITY OF BEAUMONT
OAK VALLEY PARKWAY
I BILLTO:
City of Beaumont - Public Works
Attn: Chris Trinedad / Rob Owen
CA lit M. 883648
Mamco Construction
4--)A General Engineering & General Building Contractor
Date: Project No. Invoice No.
2/8/2011 1123 -02
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
ACTUAL
QUANTITY
TOTAL PRICE
C /01
Variable AC Overlay
SF
$1.43
10,329.0 SF
$14,770.47
C /02
Remove Curb & Gutter
SF
$8.00
2.0 SF
$16.00
C/03
Remove Sidewalk
LF
$1.00
87.0 LF
$87.00
C /04
Install 9' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
SF
$3.00
282.0 SF
$846.00
C/05
Construct 6" D -1 Median Curb
LF
$15.00
100.0 LF
$1,500.00
C/06
.Construct Modified Curb Inlet
SF
$152.94
7.0 SF
$1,070.58
C /07
Additional Striping /Encroachment
LF
$12,121.30
1.0 LF
$12,121.30
Permit
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
Total Billed This Period
$30,411.35
Previously Billed
$45,505.00
Contract Amount
$45,505.00
10%► Retention
$3,041.14
Total Due
S27,370.21
Please remit to: Mamco, Inc. 16810 Van Buren Blvd. #200 * Riverside, Ca 92504
STAFF REPORT Agenda Item
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: City Manager di"
DATE: April 5, 2011
SUBJECT: Award Agreement and Task Order for Erosion repair on Oak Valley Parkway.
Background and Analysis:
During the recent rains there has been erosion on the shoulder at Oak Valley Parkway between
Palmer and the Golf Course Maintenance Yard which could lead to a safety hazard. Therefore,
proposals were requested from qualified contractors to repair the erosion.
The results are summarized below:
KAD Paving: $6,958.00
DCI : $7,350.00
Tyner Paving: $7,454.00
Fiscal Impact:
The proposed project will not impact the General Fund. This project will be funded by
Transportation Funds.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends AWARD of an Agreement and Task Order with KAD Paving Company.,
APPROVAL of the Project Progress Report, AUTHORIZATION of the Mayor to execute the
Agreement, Task Order and Project Progress Report subject to the authority of the City Attorney
to make non- substantive changes.
CITY OFBE+AUM
Manager
KAD PAVING COMPANY DBA KAD
ENGINEERING
1ZI7310TH STREET Phone: (909) 790 -3366
YUCAIPA, CA 92399 Celt #: (909 }721 -1020
GEN. CONTRACTORS" A" LIC # 937845 & C -12 Fax: (909) 790 -3369
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO:
ROB
PHONE:
FAX:
CONTRACT /PROPOSAL
WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT:
CITY OF BEAUMONT
ATT ROB Date: 03- 28-2011
KAD Paving Company will provide all materials, perform all labor, and supply all equipment for the completion of the project(s)
specified below. KAD Paving Company guarantees the usage of all materials specified within the contents of this contract/proposal.
- IMPORT 150 CY OF BASE MATERIAL
-GRADE EXISTING DIRT ON OAK VALLEY PARK WAY
- COMPACT SUB -GRADE BEFORE PLACEMENT OF BASE
- INSTALUGRADE 150 CY OF BASE MATERIAL
-ROLL FOR MAXI.MUM COMPACTION (95% OR GREATER)
- PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL
TOTAL.......................... ............................... ......................$6,958.00
EXCLUSIONS: BONDS, FEES, ASSESSMENTS, PERMITS ,SURVEY,ENGINEERING,HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL HANDL1N6 OF AN Y K1N1),KEM0VL /K1✓YLAUL /KEL0UA 1 E IN 1 EKPLK1N(i U I IL1ES, WA 1 EK SOUXUL.
Acceptance of Proposal
The above work to be performed in accordance with drawings and the specifications submitted for
The above work and complete in a workmanlike manner for the sum of: SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY
EIGHT DOLLARS
With payments to be made as follows: Upon Completion
Any alteration or deviation from the specifications provided herein, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an additional charge over and
Above the estimate(s) provided in this document. Buyer agrees to pay all court costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the event of default or if this Contract
submitted to an attorney for enforcement purposes. Owner renders Contractor harmless and agrees to ,relieve Contractor of all liability for any unsatisleotory
Results in the event that the Owner shall require Contractor to lay asphalt on sub - grade, which in the opinion of the Contractor, in unsatisfactory. Contractor
is not responsible for damage to underground utilities or lines unless such utilities or lines have been properly staked in advance of operations. Damage oau:
by others to seal -coat, striping and surrounding area after back -fill seal -coat has been applied is the sole responsibility of Owner and Owner accepts full liabilil
for such damage. Contractor is not responsible for baok -fill, oorepadtion of baok -fill Installed by others, reflective craoklng on surface - areas, and txe- existing
engineering in respect to drainage. Owner accepts full liability for the aforementioned. All engineering, testing, inspection, and permit fees have been exdud(
from the contents of this contract and shall be deemed as oollateral to contents of this Contract. This proposal shall expire In 60 days.. Payment is due at
completion of work. Interest will accrue @ 10% plus costs daily after 30 days"" - .Material costs are only valid for 30 days from date of this proposal .
Upon acceptance of bid, please complete the following information (per section 3097 California Civil Code Procedure). Sign and return one copy.
Owner:
Address:
Construction Lender:
Address:
General Contractor:
Address:
Print Name:
Signature:
Submitted By: Donnie Wheeler Jr.
By: Donnie Wheeler Jr.
28 -Mar -1 I
Ori roil COPYice
DUST CONTROL INC.
22904 BANBURY CT
MURRIETA, CA 92562
CSL #867746 951- 760 -5375
Estimate
Date Estimate #
3/28/2011 OVP328
Name t Address
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E. SIXTH ST
BEAUMONT, CA 92223
Project
Description
Qty
Rate
Total
3/28/11
OAK VALLEY PARKWAY
IMPORT APROX 150CY OF DIRT PLACE AND COMPACT
ARREARS THAT ARE ERODED FROM RAINS GRADE TO
DRAIN, TRAFFIC CONTROL NEEDED AND INCLUDED. ALL
WORK TO BE INSPECTED AND DIRECTED BY CITY OF
BEAUMONT.
LUMP SUM
7,350.00
7,350.00
INCLUDES LABOR, EQ,MOVE ON/OFF,MATERIAL
THANK YOU
BOB
Total $7,350.00
'03/28/2011 08:58 FAX
TYNER PAVING COMPANY
1598 W. Second Street • Pomona, CA 91766
Tel: (909) 865 -7283 • Fax: (909) 868 -0161 • License No. 676195 Class A, C -12
To: City of Beaumont
Address:
Attention: Rob
PROPOSAL
Date: 3 -23-11
Job Description: Backfill gas line trench
Project: Gaurdrail & Backfill Project
Elm St. S /of Oak Valley
Phone:
1. install approx. 150 CY. class 2 base over existing gas line.
2. Provide traffic control for entire grading operation.
Total = $7,454.00
Fax:
TOTAL PRICE: ESTIMATOR: Craig Thomas
Exclusions: Permits, testing, inspections, subgrade recompaction and engineering.
16 002
IMPORTANT CONDITIONS- TERMS, UNLESS SPECIFIED TO THE CONTRARY ABOVE, NET CASE TO BE PAID ON
COMPLETION OF JOB, AS DEFINED IN CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 3D86.
TYNER PAVING COMPANY shall not be liable for any damage to or breakage of underground pipes and /or conduits not
visible from the surface of the ground nor for any damage to approaches (including sidewalk) from street to property line.
1. No guarantee of drainage on re- surfacing.jobs unless otherwise specified in the above contract
! - 2. No guarantee of re- growth of vegetation on re- surfacing jobs unless otherwise specified in the above contract.
3. No guarantee on cracking on re- surface jobs unless otherwise specified in the above contract
a 4. No guarantee on patch or seal project, or cracking, vegetation or surface finish.
5. Price good for 30 days from date of proposal unless otherwise noted above.
i Accepted by: Date:
Proposal must be signed and returned to Tyner Paving Company before work can commence.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT
Transportation Funds Project Name: Repair of Erosion on Oak Valley
Source of Parkway between Palmer and Golf Course
Funds:
Contract April 5, 2011 Contractors: KAD Paving
Date:
Problems or Delays During Report Period:
9 N delays
Change Orders:
• No Change Orders
Recommendation(s) for City Council Action:
Approve and execute agreement.
Approved and authorized by:
Mayor Signature Date of City Council Approval
Rev. 09/05
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
(Project Name: Erosion Repair on Oak Valley Parkway)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of the 5th day of April, 2011, by and
between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ( "OWNER ") whose address is 550 E. 6`" Street, Beaumont,
California 92223 and Kad Paving Company dba Kad Engineering., whose address is 12173, 10`"
street, Yucaipa, CA 92399 , telephone (909) 790 3366, fax (909) 790 3369 e -mail
kadpaving @yahoo.com, Fed. Tax Id. No. 27- 0618394 ( "CONTRACTOR ").
RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and
intentions of the parties to this Agreement:
A. OWNER desires to engage the services of CONTRACTOR to perform such
services as may be assigned, from time to time, by OWNER in writing for the purpose of Street
Repair and Pavement Rehabilitation.
B. The specific services to be performed by CONTRACTOR shall be described in
one or more written Task Orders issued by OWNER to CONTRACTOR pursuant to this
Agreement.
C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance
with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and has represented and warrants to OWNER
that CONTRACTOR possesses the necessary skills, qualifications, personnel and equipment to
provide such services.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants
contained herein, OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:
1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written
and shall continue until end May 2011 , unless extended or sooner terminated as provided for
herein.
2. Services to be Performed by CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide
such services as may be assigned, from time to time, in writing by the City Council of OWNER.
Each such assignment shall be made in the form of a written Task Order. Each such Task Order
shall include, but shall not be limited to, a description of the nature and scope of the services to
be performed by CONTRACTOR, the amount of compensation to be paid, and the expected time
of completion.
Page 1 of 10
3. Associates and Subcontractors. CONTRACTOR may, at CONTRACTOR's sole
cost and expense, employ such competent and qualified independent associates, subcontractors
and consultants as CONTRACTOR deems necessary to perform each such assignment; provided,
however, that CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any of the work to be performed without the
prior written consent of OWNER.
4. Compensation.
4.01 In consideration for the services to be performed by CONTRACTOR,
OWNER agrees to pay CONTRACTOR as provided for in each Task Order.
4.02 Each Task Order shall specify a total not -to- exceed sum of money and
shall be based upon CONTRACTOR's schedule of regular hourly rates customarily
charged by CONTRACTOR to its clients.
4.03 OWNER may reimburse CONTRACTOR for reasonable and necessary
expenses incurred by CONTRACTOR in the performance of services for OWNER.
Reimbursement shall be according to a schedule of reimbursable expenses included in
each Task Order.
4.04 CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for any services rendered nor
reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized in any Task Order
unless approved in advance by the City Council of OWNER, in writing.
4.05 Unless otherwise provided for in any Task Order issued pursuant to this
Agreement, CONTRACTOR agrees that payment of compensation earned shall be made
in monthly installments within 30 business days after receipt of a detailed, corrected,
written invoice describing in reasonable detail, to the extent applicable, the services
performed, the time spent performing such services, the hourly rate charged therefor, the
identity of individuals performing such services for the benefit of OWNER, and materials
consumed or used. Such invoice shall also include a detailed itemization of authorized
expenses incurred.
5. Obligations of Contractor.
5.01 CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all assigned services in accordance
with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those specified in each Task Order.
5.02 Except as otherwise provided for in each Task Order, CONTRACTOR
will supply all personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the assigned
services.
5.03 CONTRACTOR shall keep OWNER informed as to the progress of the
work assigned hereunder, by means of regular and frequent consultations. From
time -to -time, when requested by the OWNER, CONTRACTOR shall prepare written
status reports.
Page 2 of 10
5.04 CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health and
safety of its employees and agents in performing the services assigned by OWNER.
Therefore, CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to:
a. Obtain a comprehensive general liability insurance policy in an
amount of not less than $ 2 million per occurrence for all coverage naming
OWNER as an additional insured;
b. Optional Insurance Coverage: Choose and check one:
Required _/Not Required _x_; Obtain a policy of errors and omissions
insurance in a minimum amount of $ per occurrence to
cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by CONTRACTOR, its
employees and/or agents in the performance of any services for OWNER;
C. Comply with all applicable local (including OWNER'S), state and
federal laws, rules and regulations regarding, by way of example and not by
limitation, nondiscrimination and payment of wages;
d. Provide worker's compensation insurance for CONTRACTOR's
employees and agents with limits as prescribed by law and custom.
CONTRACTOR waives all rights of subrogation against OWNER. Evidence of
all insurance coverage shall be provided to OWNER prior to issuance of the first Task
Order. Such policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer (minimum Best's Ins. Guide
rating of "A:VIF) licensed to do business in California, and shall provide that they shall
not be cancelled or amended without 30 days' prior written notice to OWNER. Self -
insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications. CONTRACTOR
acknowledges and agrees that all such insurance is in addition to CONTRACTOR's
obligation to fully indemnify and hold OWNER completely free and harmless from and
against any and all claims arising out of any, loss, injury or damage to property or persons
caused by the negligent acts or omissions of CONTRACTOR in performing services
assigned by OWNER.
5.05 CONTRACTOR and OWNER agree that OWNER, its employees,
agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any
loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys' fees, litigation costs, defense
costs, court costs or any other costs arising out of or in any way related to the
performance of this Agreement. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are
intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection
possible under the law to OWNER. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that OWNER would
not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of CONTRACTOR to
indemnify and protect OWNER as set forth here.
Page 3 of 10
5.05.1 To the full extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall defend,
indemnify and hold harmless OWNER, its employees, agents and officials, from
any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative
proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind,
whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys' fees incurred by owner,
court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other
costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred
in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of or in any way attributable
actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this
Agreement. CONTRACTOR's obligation to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless shall include any and all claims, suits and proceedings in which
CONTRACTOR (and/or CONTRACTOR's agents and /or employees) is alleged
to be an employee of OWNER. All obligations under this provision are to be paid
by CONTRACTOR as they are incurred by OWNER.
5.05.2 Without affecting the rights of OWNER under any provision of
this Agreement or this Section, CONTRACTOR shall not be required to
indemnify and hold harmless OWNER as set forth above for liability attributable
to the sole fault of OWNER, provided such sole fault is determined by agreement
between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. This
exception will apply only in instances where OWNER is shown to have been
solely at fault and not in instances where CONTRACTOR is solely or partially at
fault or in instances where OWNER's fault accounts for only a percentage of the
liability involved. In those instances, the obligation of CONTRACTOR will be
all- inclusive and OWNER will be indemnified for all liability incurred, even
though a percentage of liability is attributable to conduct of OWNER.
CONTRACTOR acknowledges that its obligation pursuant to this Section extends
to liability attributable to OWNER, if that liability is less than the sole fault of
OWNER. CONTRACTOR has no obligation under this Agreement for liability
proven in a court of competent jurisdiction or by written agreement between the
parties to be the sole fault of OWNER.
5.06 In the event that OWNER requests that specific employees or agents of
CONTRACTOR supervise or otherwise perform the services specified in each Task
Order, CONTRACTOR shall ensure that such individual (or individuals) shall be
appointed and assigned the responsibility of performing the services.
5.07 In the event CONTRACTOR is required to prepare plans, drawings,
specifications and /or estimates, the same shall be furnished in conformance with local,
state and federal laws, rules and regulations.
Page 4 of 10
5.08 CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for obtaining all permits,
licenses and approvals necessary or applicable to the performance of services under this
Agreement, unless otherwise expressly provided for in any Task Order issued pursuant to
this Agreement. In the event OWNER is required to obtain an approval or permit from
another governmental entity, CONTRACTOR shall provide all necessary supporting
documents to be filed with such entity.
5.09 CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for obtaining Employment
Eligibility Verification information from CONTRACTOR's employees, in compliance
with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99 -603 (8 U.S.C. 1324a),
and shall ensure that CONTRACTOR's employees are eligible to work in the United
States.
5.10 Drug -free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, the
CONTRACTOR hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California that the CONTRACTOR will comply with the requirements of the Drug -Free
Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code, Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a
drug -free workplace.
5.11 Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy. The CONTRACTOR agrees to
establish an anti -drug use and alcohol misuse program consistent with the requirements of
this Section. The CONTRACTOR's anti -drug use and alcohol misuse program shall
include the following:
a. The adoption, and enforcement, of a policy on prohibited drug use
and alcohol misuse in the workplace, including the consequences associated with
prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse. The CONTRACTOR shall disseminate
the policy statement to its employees;
b. An education and training program in which employees and their
supervisors shall receive at least 60 minutes of training on the effects and
consequences of prohibited drug use on personal health, safety, and work
environment, and on the signs and symptoms that may indicate prohibited drug
use and alcohol misuse. In addition, supervisors shall receive an additional 60
minutes of training on the physical, behavioral and performance indicators of
probable drug use and alcohol misuse;
C. A testing program which meets the requirements of Section 3
below; and
d. Procedures for referring an employee who has a verified positive
drug test result or an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater to a substance abuse
professional.
Page 5 of 10
5.12 Drug and Alcohol Testing.
a. Drug Testing: The CONTRACTOR shall establish a program that
provides testing for prohibited drugs in the following circumstances: pre-
employment, post- accident, reasonable suspicion, random and return to
duty /follow -up. When administering a drug test, the CONTRACTOR agrees to
ensure that the following drugs are tested for: marijuana, cocaine, opiates,
amphetamines, and phencyclidine.
b. Alcohol Testing: The CONTRACTOR shall establish a program
that provides for testing of alcohol in the following circumstances: post- accident,
reasonable suspicion, random and return to duty /follow -up. The CONTRACTOR
shall prohibit an employee, while having an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or
greater, from performing or continuing to perform a safety- sensitive function.
5.13 Background Investi ate CONTRACTOR acknowledges that certain of
CONTRACTOR's employees perform services that have the potential for endangering
the health and safety of members of the general public, and have unrestricted access to
sensitive OWNER operations and facilities which, if improperly operated or maintained,
could result in personal injury or death to themselves, co- workers and the public.
Therefore, the CONTRACTOR hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to develop
and implement an employee security system and program that includes, but is not limited
to, the following:
a. A personal history statement;
b. Reference checks;
C. Photographs;
d. Fingerprinting;
e. Background investigation, including information from the
California Department of Justice and the Department of Motor Vehicles.
6. Obligations of Owner.
6.01 OWNER shall do the following in a manner so as not to unreasonably
hinder the performance of services by CONTRACTOR:
a. Provide information, requirements and criteria regarding
OWNER's project;
b. Furnish all existing studies, reports and other available data and
items pertinent to each Task Order that are in OWNER's possession;
Page 6 of 10
C. Designate a person to act as a liaison between CONTRACTOR and
the City Council of OWNER.
7. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.
7.01 During the term of this Agreement, the City Council of OWNER may,
from time to time, and without affecting the validity of this Agreement or any Task Order
issued thereunder, order changes, deletions and additional services by the issuance of
written change orders authorized and approved by the City Council of OWNER.
7.02 In the event CONTRACTOR performs additional or different services
than those described in any Task Order or authorized change order without the prior
written approval of the City Council of OWNER, CONTRACTOR shall not be
compensated for such services.
7.03 CONTRACTOR shall promptly advise OWNER as soon as reasonably
practicable upon gaining knowledge of a condition, event or accumulation of events
which may affect the scope and /or cost of services to be provided pursuant to this
Agreement. All proposed changes, modifications, deletions and /or requests for additional
services shall be reduced to writing for review and approval by the City Council of
OWNER.
7.04 In the event that OWNER orders services deleted or reduced,
compensation shall likewise be deleted or reduced by a fair and reasonable amount and
CONTRACTOR shall only be compensated for services actually performed. In the event
additional services are properly authorized, payment for the same shall be made as
provided in Section 4 above.
8. Termination of Agreement.
8.01 In the event the time specified for completion of an assigned task in a Task
Order exceeds the term of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall be
automatically extended for such additional time as is necessary to complete such Task
Order, and thereupon this Agreement shall automatically terminate without further notice.
8.02 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, OWNER, at its
sole option, may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving 10 days' written notice to
CONTRACTOR, whether or not a Task Order has been issued to CONTRACTOR.
8.03 In the event of termination, the payment of monies due CONTRACTOR
for work performed prior to the effective date of such termination shall be paid within 45
business days after receipt of an invoice as provided in this Agreement. Upon payment
for such services, CONTRACTOR agrees to promptly provide and deliver to OWNER all
original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the
possession or control of CONTRACTOR and pertain to OWNER.
Page 7 of 10
9. Status of Contractor.
9.01 CONTRACTOR shall perform the services assigned by OWNER in
CONTRACTOR's own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of
CONTRACTOR's independent calling, and not as an employee of OWNER.
CONTRACTOR shall be under the control of OWNER only as to the result to be
accomplished and the personnel assigned to perform services. However,
CONTRACTOR shall regularly confer with OWNER's City Council as provided for in
this Agreement.
9.02 CONTRACTOR hereby specifically represents and warrants to OWNER
that the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in
accordance with the standards customarily applicable to an experienced and competent
professional rendering the same or similar services. Further, CONTRACTOR represents
and warrants that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of CONTRACTOR has
the full authority to bind CONTRACTOR to this Agreement.
10. Ownership of Documents, Audit.
10.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs,
specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties and all other documents of any kind or
nature prepared, developed or obtained by CONTRACTOR in connection with the
performance of services assigned to it by OWNER shall become the sole property of
OWNER, and CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver all such materials to OWNER. At
the OWNER's sole discretion, CONTRACTOR may be permitted to retain original
documents, and furnish reproductions. If OWNER uses such documents for any purpose
other than for which they were prepared without CONTRACTOR's prior written
approval, OWNER hereby waives any claims against CONTRACTOR and will hold
CONTRACTOR harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from
OWNER's unauthorized use.
10.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations,
OWNER shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to
this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall not use for purposes other than the performance
of this Agreement, nor shall CONTRACTOR release, reproduce, distribute, publish,
adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials
first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so,
without the prior written consent of OWNER.
10.03 CONTRACTOR shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four
years following termination of this Agreement, all time records, accounting records and
vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning services performed,
compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours
and as often as OWNER may deem necessary, CONTRACTOR shall make available to
OWNER's agents for examination all of such records and shall permit OWNER's agents
to audit, examine and reproduce such records.
Page 8 of 10
11. Miscellaneous Provisions.
11.01 This Agreement supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or
written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of services by
CONTRACTOR for OWNER and contains all of the covenants and agreements between
the parties with respect to the rendering of such services in any manner whatsoever. Any
modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both
parties.
11.02 CONTRACTOR shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or
interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of OWNER. Unless
specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment
will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this
Agreement.
11.03 CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal
laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and /or permits applicable to, or governing the
services authorized hereunder.
11.04 If required bylaw, CONTRACTOR shall file Conflict of Interest
Statements with OWNER.
11.05 Any dispute which may arise by and between the OWNER and the
CONTRACTOR, including the CONTRACTOR's subcontractors, laborers, and suppliers,
shall be submitted to binding arbitration. Arbitration shall be conducted by the Judicial
Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc./Endispute, in accordance with its construction
industry rules in effect at the time of the commencement of the arbitration proceeding,
and as set forth in this Paragraph. Arbitration shall be conducted before a panel of three
arbitrators, unless the PARTIES agree in writing to submit the matter before a single
arbitrator. The arbitrators must decide each and every dispute in accordance with the
laws of the State of California, and all other applicable laws. The arbitrators' decision
and award are subject to judicial review for errors of fact or law in accordance with
Section 1296 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by a Superior Court of competent venue and
jurisdiction. Discovery may be conducted in the arbitration proceeding pursuant to
Section 1283.05 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Unless the PARTIES stipulate to the
contrary, prior to the appointment of the arbitrators, all disputes shall first be submitted to
non - binding mediation, conducted by either the American Arbitration Association or
Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. /Endispute, in accordance with their
respective rules and procedures for such mediation. In any arbitration or litigation arising
out of this Agreement, or the performance of any obligation under this Agreement, the
arbitrators or the court in such arbitration or litigation shall award costs and expenses of
arbitration or litigation, including mediation and arbitration fees and expenses, expert
witness fees and attorneys' fees, to the prevailing PARTY.
Page 9 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement as
of the day and year first above - written.
OWNER:
CITY OF BEAUMONT
Mayor, City Council
CONTRACTOR:
Kad Paving Company.
By
Print Name lr1-e eAev- �►�'—
Title
Page 10 of 10
CITY OF BEAUMONT
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR'S TASK ORDER
(Project Title: Erosion Repair on Oak Valley Parkway)
TASK ORDER NO.: One
CONTRACTOR: Name:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax:
E -mail:
Fed. Tax Id.:
Kad Paving Company dba Kad Engineering
12173 10`" Street, Yucaipa, CA 92399
(909) 790 3366
(909) 790 3369
kadpaving @yahoo.com
27- 0618394
THIS TASK ORDER is issued pursuant to that certain Agreement for Services by
Independent Contractor between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ( "OWNER ") and Kad Paving
Company ( "CONTRACTOR ") dated April 5, 2011 (the "AGREEMENT ").
1. Task to be Performed. CONTRACTOR shall provide all labor, materials and
equipment to perform the following task (choose and check one):
See Exhibit "A ", attached hereto
Description of Task: _Erosion repair on Oak Valley Parkway
2. Time of Performance. Time is of the essence. Therefore, CONTRACTOR shall
begin work within 7 days of the date this Task Order is signed by the OWNER and shall complete
performance of such services by or before May 31, 2011.
3. Liaison of OWNER. Mr. /Ms. Rob Owen, Construction Manager shall serve as
liaison between OWNER and CONTRACTOR.
4. Staff Assignments. CONTRACTOR will assign the following personnel to perform
the services required by this Task Order: (Check if this Paragraph 4 Not Applicable: )
Donald Wheeler Jr
Page 1 of 2
5. Deliverables. CONTRACTOR shall deliver to OWNER not later than the date or
dates indicated, the following: (Check if this Paragraph 5 Not Applicable: _xx)
6. Compensation. For all services rendered by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Task
Order, CONTRACTOR shall receive a total not -to- exceed lump sum of $ 6,958.00 payable as
follows:
7. Reimbursable Expenses. In addition to the compensation provided for in Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR (choose and check one:) shall /_xxshall not /be entitled to
reimbursement for expenses. If authorized by this Task Order, reimbursable expenses shall be
limited to:
8. Miscellaneous Matters. The following additional matters are made a part of this
Task Order (choose and check one):
x_ Not applicable
See Exhibit "A ", attached hereto; or
Description:
below.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Task Order on the date indicated
CITY OF BEAMONT
Dated: By
CONTRACTOR:
Kad Paving Company
Dated: By
Print Name
Title
Page 2of2
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
PERTAINING TO ANY CONSIDERATION FOR THE PASS AND REDISTRICTING.
WHEREAS, the Pass Area consisting of the Cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa and the
County areas of Cabazon and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians are geographically connected and in
close proximity to one another; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa and the County areas of Cabazon
and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians are looking at the possibility of regional sharing of services;
and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa currently share Animal Control
Services; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa and the County areas of Cabazon
and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians share borders and meet regularly; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa and the County areas of Cabazon
and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians share common interests in the Pass both politically and
geographically and have a desire to remain in the same district to assure continued cohesiveness within
these geographic areas; and
WHEREAS, the 2010 Census population has determined the population for Riverside County is
such that there will be a need for redistricting among the five supervisorial districts; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa and the County areas of Cabazon
and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians have a desire to remain within their current Riverside County
Supervisorial District; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors will have to take on additional residents
or less in order to redistrict.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council of the City of Beaumont adopts Resolution No. 2011 -07, "A Resolution of the City
Council of the City of Beaumont Pertaining to any Consideration for the Pass and Redistricting."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 2011 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Mayor De Forge
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY ATTORNEY
�'C�—,
SUBJECT: AMENDING CHAPTER 8.12 OF THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
TO ADD SECTION 8.12.023
DATED: APRIL 5, 2011
Background
In 2007, the City Council enacted Ordinance No. 921, which substantially re -wrote Chapter 8.12
entitled "Mandatory Solid Waste Collection and Disposal."
Recently, Code Enforcement noted that there is a reference to "Section 8.12.023" in Section
8.12.025. A reading of Chapter 8.12 of the Beaumont Municipal Code reveals that there is no
Section 8.12.023.
After some research, it was determine that Section 8.12.023, which prohibited unauthorized
disposal of solid waste, was inadvertently left out of the re -write of Chapter 8.12.
Therefore, it is the purpose of Ordinance No. 994 to restore Section 8.12.023.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Ordinance No. 994, which adds Section 8.12.023 to Chapter 8.12 be
adopted.
60�-1
ORDINANCE NO. 994
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
ADDING SECTION 8.12.023 OF THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
RE: "UNAUTHORIZED DISPOSAL — PROHIBITED"
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Section 8.12.023 of Chapter 8.12 of the Beaumont Municipal Code, entitled
"Unauthorized Disposal— Prohibited" is hereby added to read as follows:
"Section 8.12.023 Unauthorized Disposal—Prohibited No person shall
deposit any debris, trash, or other personal property upon any other person's property or
in any other person's trash bin or can without that person's permission.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
MOVED AND PASSED upon first reading this
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this
reading by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
li
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
day of , 2011, by
day of , 2011, upon second
Brian DeForge, Mayor
CERTIFICATION
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Ordinance No. 995 duly introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont held on ' 2011, and was
duly adopted upon a second reading on , 2011, by the roll call votes indicated
therein.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
(SEAL)
Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF BEAUMONT
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Beaumont City
hearing on Tuesday, April 5, 2011 at approximately
Beaumont Civic Center, 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont
testimony and comments from all interested persons
following matter(s):
Ordinance No. 994:
Council will conduct a public
6:00 p.m. in room 5 at the
California 92223, to receive
regarding the adoption of the
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California Adding
Section 8.12.023 of the Beaumont Municipal Code RE: "Unauthorized Disposal —
Prohibited"
Date: March 21, 2011
-ss-
Shelby Hanvey
Deputy City Clerk
Publish one time only in the Record Gazette on March 25, 2011
City of Beaumont - 550 E. 6th Street • Beaumont - CA • 92223 - (951) 769 -8520
q, t'-)
STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: AMENDING THE GENERAL PENALTY PROVISION OF THE
BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
DATED: APRIL 5, 2011
Background
Historically, the Beaumont Municipal Code specified a code violation as a misdemeanor. More
recently, as new ordinances are enacted, the penalty provision for the new ordinances specified
an infraction in addition to a misdemeanor.
As the result of changes in State law, our penalty provisions need further revision in order to take
into account the distinction between building and non - building code violations.
Recommendation
Adoption of Ordinance No. 995 amending Section 1. 16.030 of the Beaumont Municipal Code for
the purpose of establishing a general, all- purpose penalty provision that provides the
Enforcement Officer with the flexibility to cite administratively, or as an infraction, or
misdemeanor, in his/her discretion.
Updatcd 11/09
Chapter 1.16
GENERAL PENALTY
Sections:
1.16.010 Violation- Misdemeanor -When.
Violation- Misdemeanor - Penalty.
Violation- Infraction - Penalty.
Separate Offense.
Administrative Fines and Penalties
16.050.1 Authorization to Fine.
16.050.2 Notice to Remedy /Abate and Penalty.
16.050.3 Method of Service of Notices and Orders
16.050.4 Amount of Administrative Fine and Penalty
16.050.5 Administrative Appeal
1.16.020
1.16.030
1.16.040
1.16.050
1.16.010 -- 1.16.050
I )
1.16.010 Violation - Misdemeanor -When. Any person violating any of the
provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of the ordinances
of the City, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless the violation is made an infraction
by ordinance. (Ord. No. 828, § I, 4 -2 -02)
1.16.020 Violation- Misdemeanor - Penalty. Except in cases where a
different punishment is prescribed by any ordinance of the City any person convicted of 4
a misdemeanor for violation of an ordinance of the City is punishable by a fine of not
more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not to exceed six
months or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. No. 828, § 1, 4 -2 -02)
1.16.030 Violation — Infraction — Penalty Except in cases where a different
punishment is prescribed by any ordinance of the City, any person convicted of an
infraction for violating an Ordinance of the City, is punishable by: (Ord. No. 933, 4 -1 -08)
A. A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation;
B. A fine not exceeding $500.00 for a second violation of the same
Ordinance within one year;
C. A fine not exceeding $1,000.00 for each additional violation of the
same Ordinance within one year."
1.16.040 Separate Offense. Each such person shall be guilty of a
separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any
provision of the ordinances of the City is committed, continued or permitted by any such
person, and he shall be punishable accordingly. (Ord. No. 828, § 1, 4 -2 -02)
1.16.050 Administrative Fines and Penalties. Any violation of any City
ordinance shall, in addition to any criminal penalties, be subject to an administrative fine
or penalty. The administrative procedures that shall govern the imposition,
enforcement, collection and administrative review of administrative fines or penalties are
as follows: (Ord. 828, 4.2.02)
BMC Title 1: 8
�dl
i4x�
ORDINANCE NO. 995
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING SECTION 1.16.030 OF CHAPTER 1.16
OF THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
ENTITLED "VIOLATION— INFRACTION— PENALTY"
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Section 1. 16.030 of Chapter 1.16 of the Beaumont Municipal Code, entitled
"Violation— Infraction— Penalty" is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Section 1.16.030 Violation— Infraction — Administrative Fine — Penalty
A. Except as provided in subsection B below and in cases where a
different punishment is prescribed by any Ordinance of the City, any person
subject to code enforcement by administrative citation or convicted of an
infraction for violating an Ordinance of the City, is punishable by:
i. A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation;
ii. A fine not exceeding $200.00 for a second violation of
the same Ordinance within one year;
iii. A fine not exceeding $500.00 for each additional
violation of the same Ordinance within one year of the first violation.
The fourth violation and every violation of the same Ordinance within
one year may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.
B. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a violation of a
City building and safety code provision is punishable by:
i. A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation;
ii. A fine not exceeding $500.00 for a second violation of
the same provision within one year;
iii. A fine not exceeding $1,000.00 for each additional
violation of the same provision within one year of the first violation."
The fourth violation and every violation of the same Ordinance within
one year may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
MOVED AND PASSED upon first reading this
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this
reading by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
LIZ
day of , 2011, by
day of , 2011, upon second
BRIAN DE FORGE, Mayor
CERTIFICATION
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Ordinance No. duly introduced
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont held on , 2011, and
was duly adopted upon a second reading on , 2011, by the roll call votes indicated
therein.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
VA
(SEAL)
Deputy City Clerk
Chapter 1.16
GENERAL PENALTY
Sections:
1.16.010
Violation- Misdemeanor -When.
1.16.020
Violation- Misdemeanor - Penalty.
1.16.030
Violation- Infraction - Penalty.
1.16.040
Separate Offense.
1.16.010 Violation - Misdemeanor -When. Any person violating any of the
provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of the ordinances
of the City, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless the violation is made an infraction
by ordinance. (Ord. No. 828, § I, 4 -2 -02)
1.16.020 Violation- Misdemeanor - Penalty. Except in cases where a
different punishment is prescribed by any ordinance of the City any person convicted of
a misdemeanor for violation of an ordinance of the City is punishable by a fine of not
more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not to exceed six
months or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. No. 828, § 1, 4 -2 -02)
1.16.030 Violation— infraction— Administrative Fine — Penalty.
A. Except as provided in subsection B below and in cases where a different
punishment is prescribed by any Ordinance of the City, any person subject to code
enforcement by administrative citation or convicted of an infraction for violating an
Ordinance of the City, is punishable by:
A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation;
ii. A fine not exceeding $200.00 for a second violation of the same
Ordinance within one year;
iii. A fine not exceeding $500.00 for each additional violation of the
same Ordinance within one year of the first violation.
The fourth violation and every violation of the same Ordinance within one year
may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.
B. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a violation of a City building
and safety code provision is punishable by:
i. A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation;
ii. A fine not exceeding $500.00 for a second violation of the same
provision within one year;
iii. A fine not exceeding $1,000.00 for each additional violation of the
same provision within one year of the first violation.
The fourth violation and every violation of the same Ordinance within one year
may thereafter be charged as a misdemeanor.
1.16.040 Separate Offense. Each such person shall be guilty of a separate
offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any
provision of the ordinances of the City is committed, continued or permitted by any such
person, and he shall be punishable accordingly. (Ord. No. 828, § 1, 4 -2 -02)
CITY OF BEAUMONT
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Beaumont City Council will conduct a public
hearing on Tuesday, April 5, 2011 at approximately 6:00 p.m. in room 5 at the
Beaumont Civic Center, 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223, to receive
testimony and comments from all interested persons regarding the adoption of the
following matter(s):
ORDINANCE NO. 995
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 1.16.030 OF CHAPTER 1.16 OF THE
BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "VIOLATION—INFRACTION-
PENALTY"
Date: March 21, 2011
-ss-
Shelby Hanvey
Deputy City Clerk
Publish one time only in the Record Gazette on March 25, 2011
City of Beaumont • 550 E. 6th Street - Beaumont • CA • 92223 • (951) 769 -8520
Agenda Item No. q , L'
STAFF REPORT
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Community and Economic Development Department
Date: April 5th, 2010
Subject: Street Vacation 10 -SV -02 and 11 -SV -01 a Request for the Vacation of a Portion
of Edgar Avenue (located between Interstate 10 and Fifth Street) and Magnolia
Avenue (located between Interstate 10 and Fourth Street).
Applicant: City of Beaumont and Harvey Marcell
Background and Analysis:
Staff is in receipt of an application for the vacation of a portion of Edgar Ave which runs
north/south between Fifth Street and Interstate 10. Additionally staff has prepared an application
to vacate Magnolia Avenue which runs north/south between Fourth Street and Interstate 10.
These are street remnants that are left over from the Interstate 10 Right -of -way. These streets do
not serve any useful purpose and is not used for primary access by any of the adjoining
properties, nor is it expected to be necessary in the future, both these streets dead end into the
freeway.
The location and dimensions of the proposed street vacation action are illustrated in the attached
package.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Hold a Public Hearing
2. Approve Street Vacation 10 -SV -02 and 11 -SV -01
Respectfully submitted;
CITY OF BEAUMONT
Rebecca Deming
Assistant Director of Planning
Recording Requested By:
City of Beaumont
When Recorded Mail To:
City of Beaumont Planning Dept,
550 E. Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
NOTICE OF STREET VACATION NO.10 -SV -002
RECORDED OWNER(S)
AFFECTED ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S)
City of Beaumont
418- 130 -001
418 -130 -028
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTED PARCEL
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" AND EXHIBIT "s" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.
SIGNATURE OF RECORD OWNER(S) (MUST BE NOTARIZED)
DEPARTMENT USE OLNY
I b-5 y`'- bbZ.
PROPERTY "A"
This Notice of Street Vacation No. is approved
Td1e/company (if applicable) Mayor, City of Beaumont
Date:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )SS.
B
Title: C% OtnT rV C 0 tr
C
COUNTY OF
Date: 7� L
ON before me,
(insert name and title of officer) personally appeared
SURVEY DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he /she/they executed the same in his/her /their
Nt LAN O SG,p
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
SOON
instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
the instrument.
�tr,5 \SNIAYNF�
9�
acted, executed
p 2� O
p
I certify under Penalty of Perjury under the laws of the State of California
4 O 9
that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
N0.6359
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OF CW�F
Signature
Of Notary Public
See additional sheets for additional notaries needed
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
EXHIBIT 'A' -LEGAL DESCRIPTION
STREET VACATION 140.10 -S1/ -002
That portion of Edgar Avenue as shown by Amended Map of the Town of Beaumont, in the
City of Beaumont, recorded in Map Book 6, Pages 16 and 17 of Maps, Records of San
Bernardino County, California located within Section 10, US, R1W, S.B.M. described as follows:
B 0-A-1 at the Northwest corner of Lot 13, Block 113 of said map,
lh1 South 00'12'55" West along the east line of Edgar Avenue and the westerly line of said
Lot 13 a distance of 67.30 feet to a point on the northerly right of way of Interstate 10
recorded as grant deed instrument no. 51341 on July 18, 1958 in Book 2303 page 372,
Official Records of Riverside County;
7hN from said point with a radial bearing of North 13'49'22" East along a non — tangent
curve concave northerly with a radius of 1,100 feet from through an angle of 0709'14",
a distance of 41.35 feet to a point on the centerline of Edgar Avenue with a radial bearing
of North 165836" East;
1hon North 00'12'55" East along the centerline of Edgar Avenue a distance of 56.82 feet;
DOW South 89'46'21" East a distance of 40.00 feet to the Posit of B gkh .
This description contains 2,488 square feet, more or less.
As shown on Exhibit "B" Sheet 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof.
QROFESS /p yq
EXP. 12 -31 -11
R'
OF. A�
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
EXHIBIT 'A' -LEGAL DESCRIPTION
81 FEET VACATION 140. V-W-W2
]1 \`� \`1 ' 'M- 1 1 Ili:
That portion of Edgar Avenue as shown by Amended Map of the Town of Beaumont, in the
City of Beaumont, recorded in Map Book 6, Pages 16 and 17 of Maps, Records of San
Bernardino County, California located within Section 10, US, R1W, S.B.M. described as follows:
B�IMIig at the Northwest comer of Lot 13, Block 113 of said map,
7hsm South 00'12'55" West along the east line of Edgar Avenue and the westerly line of said
Lot 13 a distance of 67.30 feet to a point on the northerly right of way of Interstate 10
recorded as grant deed instrument no. 51341 on July 18, 1958 in Book 2303 page 372,
Official Records of Riverside County;
1hmi from said point with a radial bearing of North 1349'22" East along a non — tangent
curve concave northerly with a radius of 1,100 feet from through an angle of 0709'147,
a distance of 41.35 feet to a point with a radial bearing of North 1658'36" East
on the centerline of Edgar Avenue; said point being the TPA POW of Begi I g
Dim from said point with a radial bearing of North 165836' East along a non — tangent
curve concave northerly with a radius of 1,100 feet from through an angle of 02'10'37",
a distance of 41.80 feet to a point with a radial bearing of North 18'09'14 East
on the west line of Edgar Avenue and the east line of Lot 1, Block 112 of said Map;
Than North 00'12'55" East along the west line of Edgar Avenue a distance of 44.72 feet;
ihsm South 8746'21" East a distance of 40.00 feet;
7hmi South 00'12'55" West a distance of 56.82 feet to the T= PiOilt of R gi-bg.
This description contains 2,036 square feet, more or less.
As shown on Exhibit "B" Sheet 2 attached hereto and made a part hereof.
QROFESS /O*:!
A44"
V `r * 44U. LJUVd r
U, EXP. 12 -31 -11
OF C N\,
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
EXHIBIT wBw -MAP
STREET VACATION NO. 10-8V-002
SECTION 10, T.3 S., R. 1 W., S.B.M.
0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1 " =50'
40' 40'
F--t
j EDGAR AVE
BRASS DISC IN WELL S 8946'21 "E
CL 5th ST. 384 +68.33 EC FIFTH STREET
BASIS OF BEARINGS S89'46'21 "E I 1" I.P. FLUSH
PER CAL TRANS ROW MAP 981543 S89'46'21 "E
\
VACATION 1(1-40.00'-,,,�� 40.00'-,�rP.0.13.
•� w 13
04 N n �,�10� p�
� �pWH OF BFp�M
z b
I
wt I I 1D 13 12 11
O
I SO`NH INTERSTATE 10
R.O.W. I
AREA OF STREET VACATION 2,488 S.F.
�i Ld
a a a w
a
F
-
z o
U z
O W W 0
U 5th ST 6
r
CURVE DATA
NO.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGENT
10
0710'37"
1100.00'
41.80'
20.90'
(D,0709'147
1100.00'
41.35'
20.68'
QROFESS /04'q
Mq,�
v %" " * = N0. 23099 i-
_ EXP. 12 -31 -11 \�
qTF OFC A\-
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
EXHIBIT "B' -MAP
STREET VACATION NO.1�3V -002
SECTION 10, T.3 S., R. 1 W., S.B.M.
0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1 " =50'
40' 40'
j EDGAR AVE
BRASS DISC IN WELL �S8746'21 "E
CE 5th ST. 384 +68.33 EC FIFTH STREET
BASIS OF BEARINGS S874621 "E 1 I.P. FLUSH
PER CAL TRANS ROW MAP 981543 S8T46'21 "E
AREA OF
VACATION f40.00'-,,,,l,,,- 40.00'-,�rP.O.B.
2 04 - o N 3� g�OCK X13 E �E
-
OR Mpp 0
N co O
Lo
o
`n `o
T.P.O.B. N �0 °E
�
I *00 0- azo I o I 2p
N OF
�Ow I z/ � / / INTERSTATE 10
R.O.W. I
AREA OF STREET VACATION 2,036 S.F.
a a a w
a a o
a
M o
OO W lw
a 5th ST D r
U
CURVE DATA
NO.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGENT
10
0710'37'
1100.00'
41.80'
20.90'
0
0709"14!
1100.00'
41.35'
20.68'
JI 1 r
INTERSTATE 10
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
Recording Requested By:
City of Beaumont
When Recorded Mail To:
City of Beaumont Planning Dept.
550 E. Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
NOTICE OF VACATION NO. i - S V - O
RECORDED OWNER(S)
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S)
City of Beaumont
HIS-140-04-7 u)i$-INO- 0a8r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A PORTION OF
MAGNOLIA AVENUE
TO BE VACATED
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" AND EXHIBIT `B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.
SIGNATURE OF RECORD OWNER(S) (MUST BE NOTARIZED)
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
SIGNATURE
Title /company Mayor, City of Beaumont
1 �n
is Notice of Vacation No. 4 � V y 1 is approved
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )SS.
By:
�
Title: '' �V v y0e—
COUNTY OF }
Date: Z'5—
ON before me,
(INSERT NAME AND TITLE OF OFFICER)
personally appeared
SURVEY DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he /she/they executed the same in his/her /their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
the instrument.
Nk vaN�
acted, executed
�5�0 G
S
WAYNF 9G
I certify under Penalty of Perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
E ` I Z
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
qx
NO.6359
9� OF
CAi.�F��
Signature
Of Notary Public
*See additional sheets for additional notaries*
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
EXHIBIT "A"
BEING A PORTION OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON AMENDED MAP OF THE
TOWN BEAUMONT OF MAPS, FILED IN BOOK 6, PAGES 16 THROUGH 17,
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
LYING WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 24 OF BLOCK 116 OF SAID MAP
AS SHOWN ON CALTRANS MAP 981545 OF SAID STATE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING
ON THE INTERSECTION NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOURTH STREET
AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON
SAID CALTRANS MAP,
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOURTH STREET
NORTH 89 04621" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID RIGHT
OF WAY LINE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF SAID MAGNOLIA AVENUE AND SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 25 OF BLOCK 115
OF SAID AMENDED MAP OF THE TOWN OF BEAUMONT,
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOURTH STREET,
NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID MAGNOLIA AVENUE, NORTH
00 013'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 31.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE
OF SAID MAGNOLIA AVENUE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 10 AS SHOWN ON SAID CALTRANS MAP,
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
INTERSTATE 10, NORTH 81-52'31 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 80.86 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON
SAID CALTRANS MAP, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT
24 OF BLOCK 116 OF SAID AMENDED MAP OF THE TOWN BEAUMONT,
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 10,
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE,
SOUTH 00 °1339" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 42.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID FOURTH STREET, SAID POINT ALSO
BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 24 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 2,963 SQUARE FEET MORE
OR LESS.
SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B"A TTA CHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
w
4w tis s �,
-ZIP
DENNIS W. JAND DATE
L. S_ 6359 s� No. 6359
OF CALX
WO# ULC_11_008 I CITY OF BEAUMONT I SHEET L OF L
1 DATE 3/17/11 1
DRAWN BY TJ STREET VACATION _LI_�j[_QL----------
3 rl
LL-
V O
N r
~_ 11
N
®� I U W
Lij
N N
MOM
lu
m
0
W m I W �° W
F- 4 W
? 3ws£.£�ooON n: 'I
,�s zv = O N
a
ci-' O UQ n
LU o o w
M � �� W m
m Q_'
F— 5-: Z
C) m
co
3nN3/1 d Vi7ONJ VW Z
0
3..6£.£ 6 o00N °
u
QQ �-
w
m
N
W U
Q w cn
HJYON
CJ
Agenda Item No. L)
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 9
FROM: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT.V �/
AGENDA DATA: APRIL 5, 2011
SUBJECT: CITY FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM — SITE
IMPROVEMENTS AT THE LIL LUAU /CELEBRITY
CARPETS COMMERCIAL CENTER, LOCATED AT 385 E.
SIXTH STREET
APPLICANT: RANDY REYNOLDS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Discussion of a request from Randy Reynolds, as representative for the owner of
the Lil Luau /Celebrity Carpets Commercial Center, for City assistance in terms of
site and facade improvements under the City's Facade Program.
Fiscal Impact
A 50% Match, which is the maximum amount under the Program is $50,000. This
would be allocated from the City's Redevelopment Project Area funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Funding for the proposed tower /sign structure should be the responsibility of the
property owner, as the structure would be used for private business signage, thus
this aspect of the request should be denied; and,
2. Approval of funding, not to exceed $50,000 for the proposed facade
improvements, consistent with the terms and limitations of the adopted City
Fagade Improvement Program; or,
3. City Council may provide staff with differing or additional direction relative to
the applicant's request.
Lil Luau /Celebrity Carpet FaVade Proposal
Staff Report
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
A few months back, the owner of the Lil Luau/Celebrity Carpets Commercial Center,
approach staff with a facade improvement plan for the existing commercial center located
at the Southwest corner of E. 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue. Staff met several times
with the representative of the property to refine this proposal further, which is before you
today.
In terms of how this proposal relates to the City' Fagade Improvement Programs, the
program's goal is to enhance the character of Beaumont that focuses on improving the
existing building stock and streetscapes within Beaumont's Downtown Core and
Redevelopment Project Area. This includes defining and creating a unique identity and
sense of place for the City; to improve the existing building stock which will enhance the
economic viability of the City, to encourage existing and new landowners to reinvest
within their properties and to create high quality architectural designs that strongly relates
to the existing pedestrian - oriented grid pattern street system.
ANALYSIS:
Building Enhancements
In terms of the proposed improvements to the existing building, all sides of the existing
building would be refinished with a new stucco finish, stone veneers and roof trim
moulding elements in an Italian- Spanish Architectural Style. For the northern side of the
building, a series of archways are proposed for this building facade, which would front
along E. 6th Street. For the eastern side of the building that fronts the existing parking lot,
this facade will be enhanced with an arcade of archways, new doorways and a new tower
element.
Sign Tower
With regards to the Sign Tower itself, it would be located at the northeast corner of the
lot adjacent to the intersection of E. 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue. The tower would
be 30 feet in height and would contain a bell, archway passage, City Logo, and a dome
element with an American flag at its peak.
Application Proposal
In relation to the Fagade Improvement Program, the applicant provided a costs estimate
for both the building and detached sign tower.
Lil Luau /Celebrity Carpet FaVade Proposal
Staff Report
Page 3
• For the building fagade improvements, the total improvement costs are estimated
to be $ 111,300.00.
• For the sign tower, the total costs are estimated to be $56,900.00.
Under the program, a reimbursement of 50% of eligible improvement costs, up to a
maximum value of $50,000 and a minimum value of $5,000 could be applied for. Also,
the applicant would be required to enter upon a 10 year maintenance covenant to
maintain the site and also there is annual inspection by the City.
With this proposal, the applicant is proposing two options for the Council to consider:
Option A - For the sign tower, the property owner would dedicate an easement
to the City under which the City would build the tower as part of a
separate site improvement program.
Option B - The tower would be constructed by the applicant under this fagade
improvement application, but the applicant would be seeking
additional funds beyond the $50,000 maximum.
Staff does have a concern with Option A, in terms of commercial signage for the tenants
located in the center. This is because it would contain commercial signage within a
structure that would be solely owned by the City, which would inconsistent with the
intent of the Sign Ordinance and previous policies set forth by the Council in terms of
off -site signage.
Overall, staff believes with this proposal, it would be consistent with the goals of the
City's Fagade Improvement Program, as well as, enhance Beaumont's Downtown area
and create a unique identity and sense of place for the residents of City.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that:
Funding for the proposed tower /sign structure should be the responsibility of the
property owner, as the structure would be used for private business signage, thus
this aspect of the request should be denied; and,
2. Approval of funding, not to exceed $50,000 for the proposed fagade
improvements, which is consistent with the terms and limitations of the adopted
City Fagade Improvement Program; or,
Lil Luau /Celebrity Carpet FaVade Proposal
Staff Report
Page 4
City Council may provide staff with differing or additional direction relative to
the applicant's request.
Respectfully Submitted,
Chris Tracy, Associa anner
SCAG Regional Conference & General Assembly: Getting Back to Golden: Jobs, Transp... Page 1
Contact Us I Directions to SCAG I Help I Regional Offices
SEARCH: ;Search SCAG Go
Home About Us What's New Committees Meeting Agendas Doing Business Get Involved Calendar Careers
GETTING BACK TO GOLDEN:
Jabs, Transportation & Sustainability
in Southern California
201 SCAG REC40NAL CONFERENCE
& GENERAL ASSEMBLY
May 5 - 6 j to Guk to Resort & Ckib, la Quinta, Uillornia
About
Agenda
Hotel & Travel
Photo Gallery
Sponsorship
About the Event
We look forward to having you join us at our
2011 SCAG Regional Conference & General Assembly
May 5 -6, 2011 Register Now!
La Quinta Resort & Club
49 -499 Eisenhower Drive
La Quinta, California 92253
This year's theme, "Getting Back to Golden: lobs, Transportation & Sustainability in Southern California" promises to be
as exciting and interesting as ever.
Registration is free for SCAG Regional Council Members and SCAG General Assembly Delegates /Alternates.
The general registration fee for all others is $100 (students $50) and entitles registrants to participate in all events and meals of
the SCAG Regional Conference & General Assembly.
"No shows" or cancellations after April 24, 2021 will be billed the entire registration fee.
To secure your place, please register online.
http:// www .scag.ca.gov /ga2011 /index.htm 03/30/2011
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
City of Beaumont
550 East 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
(951)769-8520
FAX (9 51)
April 5, 2011
City Council
769 -8526
Alan Kapanicas, City Manager
2011 -12 Budget Schedule
January 18, 2011 — Present census of currently budgeted employee positions compared to actual.
Present listing of current City contracts. (COMPLETED)
February 1, 2011 — Council requests to staff to review changes in employee positions and/or
current City contracts. (NO CHANGE REQUESTS MADE BY COUNCIL)
February 15, 2011 — Staff response to Council requests from February 1, 2011 meeting.
(COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTED ANOTHER CONTRACT DISCUSSION FOR MARCH
1)
March 1, 2011 — Contract discussion per Council member request and Staff decision packages
presented to Council and programs are prioritized. Council asked for their program additions,
deletions or modifications. (COUNCIL REQUESTS INCLUDED IN MARCH 15
DISCUSSION)
April 5, 2011 — Review of staff decision packages and Council requested programs.
April 19, 2011 — Preliminary general, special and capital budgets presented are presented.
May 3, 2011 — Review of general, special and capital budgets by Council and Council asked for
modifications.
May 17, 2011 — General, special and capital budgets are presented for Council approval with
changes from the April 19, 2011 meeting. Public hearing is set for June 7, 2011.
June 7, 2011 — Hold public hearing and adopt 2011 -12 general, special and capital budgets.
June 21, 2011 — Final adopted budget document is presented to Council and available to the
public via the City website.
s
a
o.
0
U'
0
G4
0
a�
a�
0
W
a�
1-1
00 0 0 0 (= 0 0 00 0 o ao 000
y r+ O O D O O O O O O C O O C O O S O
A yE CN � �- o O M N v 00
C) o0 00
o�
A
tayi o
R U
Con �.
o
Q e�
a +, c 0 a t a
O v 0 .a 4-.
'd o� i o O j 8 a 0 0 V 0 on e
o W o .c a� ° a cC"�
N O 0 p O O to O y u y r
(� Q CCS c n� 41
G4 Rs. U U Q o w; a 0 o a p� p p
oV o a a 0 0 0
y o00 o ' • ' cc'v .�' U c O O ��0++ • o . � o
o -+ N /, C N N So
y VO VO �+ p •+ �� ,C�• O W +-' O p j Q O p S V O O
a a a a a
UCaw °U A A A A A � C�
N
O
�
�
2
■
A
k
■
w■
¥
� q
� o _
g Q §
_ z _ . Q § §
to
\
§ J a 4 k � k o
( |
o m
k 0 2 §
C Q w U
cl
0
q
?
�
k
k
0
� q
� o _
g Q §
_ z _ . Q § §
to
\
§ J a 4 k � k o
( |
o m
k 0 2 §
C Q w U
cl
0
q