The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutAdoption of Proposed FY 10-11 City BudgetTem_ple AGENDA �R�, � A � U ITEM S.B. Staff Report TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 29, 2010 FROM: JOSE E. PULIDO, CITY MANAGE BY: MONICA MOLINA, FINANCIAL SERV ES MANAGER SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010-11 CITY BUDGET; GANN LIMITATION; AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66000 SUMMARY Pursuant to Section 901 of the City Charter, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing prior to the adoption of the Proposed City FY 2010-11 Budget. The public hearing will allow the City Council to hear testimony presented by any interested person about the City Proposed budget. The City Council is being requested to review and consider adoption of the proposed revenues and expenditures for FY 2010-11. The City Council is also being requested to review and confirm the factor used for the Gann Limitation and review compliance with provisions of Government Code Section 66000 (AB1600) for development fees. 1. In November 1979, the Gann Limitation was approved by the voters to insure that limits were placed on all state and local government appropriations. These appropriations calculations must be approved by the City Council. 2. On January 1, 1997, SB1683 made certain changes to AB 1600 which sets forth a standard against which fees imposed on development projects are to be measured. Government Code Section 66000 requires the City Council to review the AB1600 report which shows compliance with the provisions. 3. On January 19, 2010, the City Council established a City Council Budget Ad Hoc Committee which includes Mayor Fernando Vizcarra and Councilmember Vincent Yu. Between April and May 2010, the Budget Ad Hoc Committee met and discussed various items which included: Zero Based Budgeting; employee benefits; post employment benefits: Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department contract; and the City Council Chamber Remodel. 4. During the month of April, City Manager Jose Pulido and Financial Services Manager Monica Molina met with management staff to review and discuss their Zero Based Budget (ZBB) Worksheets for each department. Due to cost of living increases on many service contract agreements. ZZB allowed the City to maintain similar General Fund expenditures as in FY 2009-10. Honorable City Council June 29, 2010 Page 2 5, On May 8, 2010, the City Council held a Special Goal Setting Session with City Staff and a professional facilitator. The outcome of the session provided direction to the City Manager to change the City organization from "Status quo" to a "High Performance Organization". The City Council requested that these changes be included in the Proposed FY 2010-11 City Budget and agreed to change the City Budget adoption date from June 15, 2010 to June 29, 2010. 6. On May 13, 2010. City staff presented the City Council with a Proposed Temple City Budget for FY 2010-11. 7. On May 20, 2010. the City Council held its First Budget Study Session to review and discuss the proposed Temple City budget. At this meeting, the City Council gave staff direction to propose changes based on the City Council's May 81h directive to the City Manager. 8, On June 22, 2010, the City Council held its Second Budget Study Session to discuss the City Manager's proposed "Road Map" for the City department and operations reorganization. Changes to the Proposed City's Budget include $95,120 for reorganizing departments and new staff positions; $214,100 in several professional contract services, and $95,705 in additional operations/maintenance savings. 9. On June 24, 2010, the City published a public hearing notice in the Pasadena Star News regarding the Proposed FY 2010-11 City Budget adoption on June 29, 2010 ANALYSIS Recommended FY 2414-11 City Budget 1. Revenues During FY 2009-10 Mid Year Budget review, staff requested the City Council to reduce its estimated General Fund revenues from $10,106,250 to $9,914,930. A $191,320 reduction in revenues was made due to decreasing sales tax revenues and interest income on investments. For FY 2010-11, the total estimated General Fund revenues are $9,886,340 which is slightly less than the estimated revenues for FY 2009-10. 2 Expenditures Consistent with the City Council's direction on June 22, 2010, staff has revised the FY Proposed FY 2010-11 City Budget with the approved City Council changes (e.g., reorganization and contract services). Last week the City received the approved health premium rates that will be effective January 1, 2011. Every year, the City adopts the budget with estimated health benefit premiums. Due to the delay in adopting FY 2010-11 Budget Document, staff was able to apply the appropriate health benefits rates to FY 2010-11 proposed City budget. Honorable City Council June 29, 2010 Page 3 The total General Fund expenditures for FY 2010-11 are projected to be $9,781,510. These expenditures include $9,683,510 for operations and $98,000 for equipment replacement. Expenditures for FY 2010-11 include, presenting a new multi-lingual communications strategy for City programs events and new city web page text; production of City Manager's brochure listing goals, vision and strategies; preparation of a public safety work plan, and beginning the update of the General Plan. Proposed FY 2010-11 City Budget has a surplus of $104,830 The total Unreserved General Fund balance for June 30, 2011 is estimated to be $21,115,182. This is a $76,462 decrease in the General Fund balance due to the $378,000 in One Time Expenditures for Capital Improvement Projects (e.g., upgrade sewer line on Longden Avenue and storage building for the La Rosa City Yard). Gann Limitation The Gann Limitation, which was approved by the voters in November 1979, insured voters that limits were placed on all state and local government appropriations. After the passage of Propostion 13, fiscal conservatives were concerned that state spending increases would prompt California lawmakers to increase other taxes to compensate for the reduction in property tax revenues. The Gann Limit was proposed as a mechanism to limit State spending. In June 1990, the voters of California approved Proposition 111 which revised the annual adjustment factors applied to the 1986-87 Limit and each year thereafter. The City Council is required to confirm, each fiscal year, the factor used for calculating the annual appropriation limit. The City of Temple City's Appropriations Limit for FY 2010- 2011 is $15,245,569. The appropriations subject to the limit per the budget is $3,801,425. The calculations for the Appropriations Limit are attached (Resolution 10-4681 and Exhibit E). The City of Temple City has complied with all the provisions of Article XIIIB in determining the Appropriations Limit for FY 2010-11. Attached is Resolution 10-4681 which confirms the factors used for calculating the annual Appropriations Limit. For FY 2010-11, the California Per Capita Income and the population growth of the County, were applied to the 2009-10 Limit. Council is requested to approve the factors used for calculating the FY 2010-11 Appropriations Limit. AB 1600 Effective January 1, 1997, SB 1683 made certain changes to AB 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act. AB 1600 was originally passed in response to concerns of the development community that local agencies were imposing development fees for purposes unrelated to development projects. AB 1600 sets forth a standard against which fees imposed on development projects are to be measured. The Council is requested to review the attached report (Exhibit F) which shows compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66000 (AB 1600) for development fees. Honorable City Council June 29, 2010 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION 1. Open public hearing, 2. Receive public input, 3. Close public hearing, 4. Adopt Resolution 10-4680 which adopts the City of Temple City budget for FY 2010-2011 and makes the finding that the City is in compliance with Government Code Section 66000, and 5. Adopt Resolution 10-4681 confirming the factors used for calculating the annual Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010-11. ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A — City of Temple City Statement of Estimated Fund Balances for FY 2010-11 2. Exhibit B — City of Temple City Capital Improvement Project Recap for FY 2010- 11 3. Exhibit C — Calculations for the Appropriations Limit 4. Exhibit D — AB 1600 Compliance Report 5. Resolution 10-4680 Adoption of the Budget for FY 2010-11 6. Resolution 10-4681 Adoption of the FY 2010-11 Gann Limitation GENERAL FUND UNDESIGNATED DESIGNATED Future I:etirement Expenditure,, One Time Expenditures TOTAL UNRESERVED GENERAL FUND RESERVED Cite Loan (Calabee'8) C'it'y Loan (Chamber) Citc Loans (Homeowners) CRA Loans TOTAL GENERAL FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Traffic Safety High 'Tech Grant (CLEEP) State COPS Grant (Brulte) Proposition A Proposition C Used Oil State Office of the Traffic Safety Grant Gas Tax (2105.2106,2107.2107.5) Traffic Congestion Relief Asset Seizures Prop 1B ARRA JAG Formula Fund CDBG Local Transportation SB821 Air Quality Improvement .Measure R Sewer Reconstruction Congestion Management Highway Safety Improvement Program Surface Transp. Program - Local 1992/96 Park Bond 1996 Park Bond State Recycling/Litter Park Acquisition Lighting/Landscape District Assessment Fees Ad Valorem Tax Safe. Acct Flex. Efficient Transp Equity Act TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TRUST FUND INTERNAL SERVICE FUND Self Insurance Fund TOTAL ALL FUNDS FUND BALANCE July 1. 2010 4,414,000 738.200 16.039,444 21,191,644 637,504 6 100 56 175 1.670.20-4 23,562.227 12,470 8.754 345 2,155.2 33 :3,617.520 9.792 10.000 356 151 390 265 7'29 596.757 22,700 28,876 183,800 561.056 20.388 4.363 31,749 (1 173,250) 1.501,222 9,338,945 168,931 1,027.736 33,197,839 ESTIMATED REVENUES_ FY 1011 9,886,340 9,886,3-40 9,886,340 100.080 643.700 418.600 6.2-40 918.630 3.500 322.505 37.050 299.900 20,000 3.000 631.710 6'2,700 5.000 1'2.000 316.800 73-4.200 719.920 5,380,535 2,500 30.000 15,309,375 C ITI OF TEMPLE CITY - ANNUAL BUDGET F1 2010-2011 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED FUND BALANCES AS OF .JUNE 30, '3010 AND .JUNE 30, '2011 TRANSFERS ESTIMATED ESTENIA 'ED ESTIMATED IN EXPENDITURES EQUIPR'EH REP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FY 10-11 FS 10-11 CARRY OVER NEW MONIES 9,564,080 98.000 TRANSFERS OUT 104,830 GF DESGN 119,430 GT2107.5 196,708 GF RESVD - 104.830 GF UNDESG :375000 CIP 301,538 9,564,080 98,000 - - 602,260 96.208 GF DESG 500 GF DcsG 100,000 GI, DES(; 301,538 9,564,080 98,000 - - 798,968 125.000 100.000 75L380 3.461.825 CIP 6.190 119.430 GF UNDESG 1.217.940 10.000 600,250 ('1I' 322.505 EXHIBIT A EST. FUND BALANCE. June 30, 2011 3.41-4,000 38.200 15,962.982 21,115,182 541,296 5,600 56 775 1.570.204 23,289,057 2.350 8.78.1 325 2,047,553 573.295 9,842 10 000 2(16 271 890.265 729 22,700 65,926 -483,700 10.000 400,000 CIP 171.056 23,388 62.700 500 041,710 CIP 10,000 C'lI' 301.9-40 360.010 500 20,470 CII' 719,920 CIP 119,330 3,358,165 10,500 - - 5,853,175 6,232,175 1,024,310 5,207,865 5,000 315.050 6,653,143 13,232,295 108,500 1.023,310 5,207,865 6,653,143 B6 8,863 33,749 (1,158.395) 2.754,432 5,716,070 166,331 752,686 29.923,233 -1 ME I T 1 l l - I ^ � F r Ci T C >. ti r - I I 9 T l - � F T C >. ti 1 a �- � T - O ^I ^1 i F -« o c c c c r _ _ a � _ S _ m - I I 9 EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 5 ARTICLE XIII -B OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION (GANN INITIATIVE) Effective July 1, 1980, Proposition 4 (Gann) put a limit on the City's expenditures from tax revenues based on 1978-79 appropriations that is adjusted each succeeding year by Consumer Price Index and population changes Non -Proceeds of Taxes (Fines and Forfeitures and User Fees) were not subject to this limit In 1989-90 Proposition 111 was passed, which changed the base year to 1986-87 and allows cities to adjust their limit annually by either the change in the California per capita income or the percentage change in growth in total assessed valuation due to non residential construction For population changes cities now have the option of using either the percentage increase of the City or the percentage increase of the entire county The law also allows for the exclusion from the limit of "qualified capital outlay" which includes any appropriation for fixed assets costing over $100,000 The 2010-2011 budget expenditures are well within the statutory limit It should be noted that future revenues exceeding the limitation require a return of the excess to the taxpayers or a substantial portion of such excess will be forfeited for State uses COMPUTATION OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 2010-2011 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 2009-10 limit (1) Per Capita Income and County population change factor applied to 2009-10 appropriations limit 2010-2011 appropriations limit APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT AND APPROPRIATIONS MARGIN Proceeds of Taxes Less Exclusions Qualified Capital Outlay Appropriations Subject to Limit Appropriations Margin $15 513,961 09827 S15245 569 $7,563,250 3 761 825 S3801 425 $11 444,144 (1) Recalcuted as a result of Proposition 111 and in accordance with guidelines of the League of California Cities Formal adoption for the FY 1991-92 recalculated appropriations limit was approved by the City Council on July 2, 1991 EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 5 Schedule of Calculations of Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010-11 a) Revised Appropriation Limit Calculation Increase Annual Base City or County In California Adjustment Appropriations Fiscal Year Population Growth Per Capita Income Factor Limit 1986-87 - - - S5097,811 1987-88 101 91% County 10347% 10545% 5 097 811 x 1 0545 5 375 642 1988-89 101.62% County 10466% 106 36% 5375642 x 1 0636 5 717 533 1989-90 101 14% County 105 19% 106 39% 5.717 533 x 1 0639 6 082 883 1990-91 101 36% County 104 21 % 10563% 6 082.883 x 1 0563 6 425 349 1991-92 101 73% County 104.14% 10594% 6425349 x 1 0594 6 807 015 1992-93 101 49% County 9936% 10084% 6 807 015 x 1 0084 6 864 194 1993-94 10142% City 102.72% 104 18% 6 864 194 x 1-0418 7 151 117 1994-95 10079% City 100 71 % 101 51% 7 151 117 x 1 0151 7.259 099 1995-96 10122% City 104,72% 106 00% 7 259.099 x 1 0600 7694.645 1996-97 10063% City 10467% 105.33% 7 694 645 x 1 0533 8 104 770 1997-98 10130% City 10467% 106.03% 8 104 770 x 1 0603 8 593 488 1998-99 101,39% County 10415% 10560% 8,593488 EXHIBIT C Page 3 of 5 Schedule of Calculations of Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010-11 (Con't) a) Revised Appropriation Limit Calculation Increase Annual Base City or County In California Adjustment Appropriations Fiscal Year Population Growth Per Capita Income Factor Limit 1999-00 10178% County 10453% 10639% 9.074 723 x 1 0639 9.654.598 2000-01 101,75% County 104,91% 10675% 9,654.598 x 1 0675 10,3M283 2001-02 101 66% County 107 82% 109 61 % 10 306 283 x 1.0961 11 296 717 2002-03 101,77% County 9873% 100.48% 11,296.717 x 1 0048 11, 350, 941 2003-04 101 66% County 102 31% 10401% 11 350,941 x 1-0401 11 806 114 2004-05 10152% County 10328% 104.85% 11,806.114 x 1 0485 12, 378, 711 2005-06 101,50% County 105.26% 106.50% 12.3787711 x 1 0650 3.183 327 2006-07 10078% County 10396% 10477% 13.183.327 x 1 0477 13 812.172 2007-08 10072% County 104.42% 105 17% 13 812,172 x 1 0517 14,526 261 2008-09 100,86% County 10429% 10519% 14,526,261 x10519 15 280,174 2009-10 100,90% County 10062% 101 53% 15 280,174 x 1 .01 53 15,513 961 2010-11 100.83% County 9746% 9827% 15 513.961 x 0 9827 15 245 569 Schedule of Calculations of Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010-11 (Con't) b) Past Appropriation Limit Calculation City Increase Annual Population In Consumer Adjustment Fiscal Year Growth Price Index Factor 1986-87 - - - 1987-88 101.72% 103.04% 10480% 1988-89 100.55% 103.93% 10450% 1989-90 9919% 104,98% 10413% 1990-91 100.45% 104 21 % (1) 10468% (1) The increase in California Per Capita Income was used instead of the Consumer Price Index EXHIBIT C Page 4 of 5 Base Appropriations Limit $5 097 811 5.097, 811 x 1 0480 5 342 506 5342506 x 1 0450 5 582.919 x 1.0413 5 813 493 x 1 0468 EXHIBIT C Page 5 of 5 POPULATION GROWTH Fiscal Year City County 1987-88 101 72% 101 91% 1988-89 10055% 101 62% 1989-90 9919% 10114% 1990-91 10045% 101 36% 1991-92 100.93% 101.73% 1992-93 10093% 101 49% 1993-94 101.42% 100 96% 1994-95 10079% 10075% 1995-96 101 22% 10033% 1996-97 100.63% 100.48% AB 1600 COMPLIANCE REPORT EXHIBIT D Page 1 of 3 SEWER RECONSTRUCTION (Amounts reported are from Adopted Budgets) FY 91-92 $11,198 - Engineering design for sewer reconstruction on Broadway from Rosemead Blvd to Encinita FY 92-93 $67616 - Sewer reconstruction on Broadway from Rosemead Blvd to Encinita FY 93-94 5116,673 - Sewer Reconstruction on Broadway from Rosemead Blvd to Encinita FY 97-98 $20.000 - Construction of new sewer line as part of the project of the new facility at LOP FY 98-99 $2,100 - Citywide Sewer Capacity Study FY 99-00 $50;000 - Crtywide Sewer Capacity Study $97.000 - New sewer system on Goldenwest (This protect was a budget amendment in October 1999 in FY 99-00 ; FY 00-01 $41 950 - Citywide Sewer Capacity Study FY 01-02 $110 000 - New sewer system on Craiglee FY 03-04 $20,000 - Add'I funds for new sewer system on Craiglee $85,000 - Blackley/Olive Sanitary sewer improvement Funds loaned from the General Fund Funas loaned from the General Fund Funds loaned from the General Fund Funds loaned from the General Fund Funds loaned from the General Fund Funds loaned from the General Fund FY 04-05 $200 000 - Sewer Upgrade for Moratorium Area Funds loaned from the General Fund FY 07-08 $84,760 - Blackley/Olive Sanitary Sewer Improvement $75,000 - New Sewer Master Plan $300.000 - Upgrade Sewer Line on Longden from Muscatel to Encinita FY 08-09 $40,000 - New curb and gutter on Longden and Lemon FY 10-11 $100,000 - Add'I funds for Upgrade Sewer Line on Longden from Muscatel to Encinita CONGESTION MANAGEMENT (Amounts reported are from Adopted Budgets) FY 02-03 $28,389 - Installation of traffic signal left turn arrow on Las Tunas/Temple City Blvo (This project was a budget amendment in February 2003 in FY 02-03 ) AB 1600 COMPLIANCE REPORT EXHIBIT D Page 2 of 3 PARK ACQUISITION (Amounts reported are from Adopted Budgets) FY 88-89 $81 196 - LOP Improvements, - Purchase of four concrete picnic tables - Re -roof concession stand - Purchase of aluminiumplanking to prelate wooden planking on picnic tables and benches - Installation of additional concrete decking in picnic shelter area - Replace four exterior doors on Recreation Bldg, - LOP development & bldg expansion - relocation of maintenance storage shed construction of restrooms and conversion of the multipurpose room to a community recreation facility FY 89-90 $139,130 - LOP Improvements - Repainting of exterior surfaces of auditorium facility - Installation of indoor/outdoor carpeting in the Recreation Office - Replacement of 4 exterior doors of the Auditorium Building - Installation of 2 concrete picnic tables - Replacement of Pony Glider play apparatus FY 90-91 $3,427 - T,C. Park and LOP Improvements - Purchase of 2 concrete trash receptacles for TC Park - Repaint interior surfaces of Auditorium facility at LOP - Replacement of wooden fort play apparatus at LOP FY 92-93 $22.655 - LOP and TC Park Improvements - Develop architectural plans & specifications for the renovation of water irrigation system at LOP and TC Park - Renovate water irrigation system at LOP including conversion to an electric system FY 93-94 $5 466 - LOP Improvements - Develop plans for construction of a new facility at LOP FY 95-96 $1 385 - LOP Improvements - Renovate wading pool FY 97-98 $142 000 - LOP Improvements - Construction of a new facility for LOP FY 98-99 $22,070 - LOP Improvements - Repair and Slurry seal all asphalt surfaces - Resurface Tennis Courts - Resurface Basketball Courts - Refurbish public restrooms located at maintenance bldg $3,500 - TCP Improvements - Installation of additional bandstand brick displays FY 99-00 $26.500 - TCP and LOP Improvements - Repair and Slurry seal all asphalt surfaces - Refurbish public restrooms located at maintenance bldg $18 972 - LOP Improvements (approved by budget subcommittee) - ADA Drinking Fountains - Pads for ADA Drinking Fountain - Replace 5 Barbecue Grills - Install Coin Machines(Basketball) - Upgrade Pool Drains AB 1600 COMPLIANCE REPORT EXHIBIT D Page 3 of 3 PARK ACQUISITION (Con't) FY 00-01 624,000 - TCP Improvement - Repair and Slurry seal all asphalt surfaces $92,650 - LOP Improvements - ADA Drinking Fountains - Resurfacing of basketball courts - Walkway lighting - Installation of roll -up door for maintenance shop FY 01-02 636,800 - LOP Improvements - ADA Drinking Fountains - Replace baseball fencing - Picnic Shelters 611,000 - TCP Improvements - Relocate electrical panel FY 02-03 66,000 - LOP Improvements - Submeter for field lights - Tennis court wind screens $10250 - LOP Improvements (This project was a budget amendment in February 2003 in FY 02-03 i - Athletic field renovation - Picnic shelters FY 03-04 61,800 - TCP Improvements - Temporary power at picnic shelters 61,700 - LOP Improvements - Push-button controls for tennis courts FY 05-06 68,750 - Security Lighting for Live Oak Park FY 06-07 616250 - Add'I funds for Security Lighting for Live Oak Park $70.500 - Repair vinyl flooring at Live Oak Park Community Center FY 07-08 $25 000 - Security Lighting for Live Oak Park $35,000 - New Infield for North Baseball Diamond at Live Oak Park FY 09-10 $30 000 - New Walkway Lighting for Temple City Park $30,000 - Renovation of circular planter at Live Oak Park FY 10-11 $10,000 - Add'I funds for Renovation of circular planter at Live Oak Park RESOLUTION NO. 10-4680 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 2207 of the Temple City Municipal Code, the City Manager has prepared and submitted to the City Council a proposed budget for the 2010-2011 fiscal year starting July 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City Council, as the legislative body of the City has reviewed and modified this proposed budget, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary for the efficient management of the City that certain sums of revenue of the City be appropriated to the various departments, programs and activities of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temple City does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. A certain document, which includes all reserves, revenues appropriations and transfers, is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temple City being marked and designated "Adopted Budget. 2010-2011 Fiscal Year". Said document, as prepared by the City Manager and amended by the City Council was adopted for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010. SECTION 2. The following sums of money are hereby appropriated from the revenue of the City of Temple City to the following named departments, programs and activities of the City for expenditure during the 2010-2011 fiscal year: SECTION 3. The City staff is authorize (by these appropriations) to expend such SLIMS without further Council approval, subject, however, to any state laws or city ordinances. BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES TOTAL EXPENDITURES CityCouncil ............ ............ .... .................... ........ ........ .... . ........... $ 141,040 CityManager .............................. ...................... ..._.... ..... .......... ._ .. 443,750 CityAttorney ....... ........ .............._..........__....................... ....... _... .... 212,210 Elections................................................................... ..... ..................53, 500 CouncilSupport....................................................... ........ ... .................. .......257,030 SupportServices....................................................... ................................111.550 Insurance/Benefits...................... ..... ............................. ...... .......... ---- .522.840 Resolution No. 10-4680 Page 2 FINANCIAL SERVICES Accounting Purchasing COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 378,165 .181,850 Planning........................ ............................ .................................... —. 496.250 Building........................................................................................... ......358.670 Housing.......................................................................... ......................329 280 Public Safety Division Law Enforcement ................................... _............. 3.618.390 Traffic Engineering.._....._ .................... _.._................... ..... . ........ . 13,280 AnimalControl........................................................ ..................... 238,930 EmergencyServices ........................................... .................... ......61.160 CodeEnforcement................................................................................... .. 333,045 R.S.V.P............................................................................. ...........................13.510 Parking Administration ......................... ........................._....... ........ 261;935 Public Works Division Administration and Engineering- . ........................... ............... 125,140 StreetCleaning.......................................................................... . . . ........ 117,600 Traffic Signal Maintenance ................................................. 115.800 Traffic Signs & Striping Mtce.......................................................... .......... 95,980 Street Maintenance .................. ......................... .............. ..........................657,500 Sidewalk Maintenance. ........ ........... .. .... . . . . .. ...... 115,000 Solid Waste Management .................. ........................... ........... .... .8.690 Street Lighting ....._ .......................... ....__........ .. .. 344,210 Maintenance Division General Government Buildings........................................................ 226,200 ParkingFacilities............................................................................... 127,340 Graffiti Abatement ................... ..... ... ................. ............... ....._.............. .... 28,110 PARKS & RECREATION Community Relations ....................................... ............ .. ......_... 335,625 Recreation/Human Services .................... ................... ... ........ 957,055 Public Transportation._............._.................................... .... ........ 751,380 Parks — Maintenance/Facilities............ ......... .......................... ........ .786,120 Trees and Parkways .................. .... ....._............ ..... .... _. _.. 419.160 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES...........................................................$13,237,295 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ............................... $108,500 Resolution No. 10-4680 Page 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Parks — Maintenance/Facilities ............... ......... .... ... ............ .... ..18,000 Street Construction.................................................................................. 6,033,705 StreetLighting .............................................. ....... _................. ........................ 20.470 General Government Buildings .............................. .............................160.000 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ................................................$6,232,175 TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES FOR FY 10-11 ...................................$19,577,970 SECTION 4. The adopted reserves, revenues, transfers in, transfers out and appropriations are reflected on the "Statement of Estimated Fund Balances" for Fiscal Year 2010-2011. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of June, 2010, MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk I, City Clerk of the City of Temple City, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 10-4680 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple Cty at a regular meeting held on the 29th day of June. 2010, by the following vote. AYES: Councilmember - NOES: Councilmember - ABSENT: Councilmember - City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 10-4681 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CONFIRMING THE FACTORS USED FOR CALCULATING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 WHEREAS, the voters of California in November, 1979 added Article XIIIB (Proposition 4) to the State Constitution placing various limitations on the appropriations of the State and local governments; and WHEREAS, the voters of California in June, 1990 modified Article XIIIB by approving Proposition 111 and SB 88 (Chapter 60/90) which revised the annual adjustment factors to be applied to the 1986-87 Limit and each year thereafter; and WHEREAS, the decision as to which of the factors: a) either the California Per Capita Income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year due to the addition of local non-residential construction in the city; b) either the city's own population growth or the entire county, must be done by a recorded vote of the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City of Temple City has complied with all the provisions of Article XIIIB in determining the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010-2011. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temple City does resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. The adjustment factors (the California Per Capita Income and the population growth of the County) are to be applied to the 2009-10 Limit. SECTION 2. The accumulated growth in the calculation of these new factors are to be applied to the Appropriations Limit in Fiscal Year 2010-2011. SECTION 3. The Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 shall be $15,245,569 for the City of Temple City as determined by Exhibit B, attached hereto. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of June, 2010 MAYOR Resolution No. 10-4681 Page 2 ATTEST: City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 10-4681 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 29th day of June, 2010 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember - NOES: Councilmember - ABSENT: Councilmember- City Clerk