Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2008-015 Resolution Granting Site Plan Approval for 705 Hame RoadMember Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2008-15 RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 705 HAMEL ROAD WHEREAS, Stauber and Rosati, LLC (the "Applicant") has applied to the City of Medina (the "City") for site plan approval to allow the development of a three unit townhome building located at 705 Hamel Road (the "Subject Property"), which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is being platted by the Applicant as a common interest community pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 515B.2-110 that contains one three unit townhome building; and WHEREAS, the City and the Applicant have agreed that plat approval by the City is not neccesary, provided that the Applicant agrees to satify the City's park deciation requirements; and WHEREAS, in lieu of a plat, the City is requiring review and approval of a site plan for the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the planning commision on February 2, 2008 and the city council on March 3, 2008 reviewed the site plan for its conformance with the City's ordinances and considered the recommendations of City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Stauber and Rosati LLC for a site plan, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. A site plan is approved to allow the construction of a three unit townhome building in accordance with the plans dated March 9, 2008 and March 10, 2008, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The common interest community association documents shall be revised to include provisions that restrict parking in front of the garages to guests only. Resolution No. 2008-15 April 1, 2008 3. A 33 foot right-of-way easement along the north end of the site for the south half of Hamel Road shall be executed by the Applicant. 4. The proposed development shall comply with the adopted International Fire Code and all the fire safety requirements of the City Fire Marshal. 5. If signage is proposed, it must be shown on the plans and meet the requirements of the City's sign ordinance. 6. Any building and site lighting must meet the City's outdoor lighting requirements and must be shown on the plans prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. The proposed development must comply with all the requirements from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission memorandum dated January 23, 2008. 8. All conditions stated in the City Engineer's letter dated March 21, 2008 shall be addressed by the Applicant. 9. The utility plan must be revised to meet all the requirements from the City's Public Works Department and the City Engineer. 10. The Applicant shall pay to the City a park dedication fee of $7,000 in lieu of dedication of land. Credit has been given for the existing lot of record. Payment of the park dedication fee is due prior to issuance of the building permit. In the event that the Applicant or future owner of the site makes an application to the City to construct additional units on the Subject Property, the Applicant or future owner will be required to pay park dedication fees for those additional units based on the park dedication ordinance in effect at that time. 11. The proposed color schemes for the building shall be shown on the plans or a separate color palette should be submitted by the Applicant. 12. The building elevations shall be revised by the Applicant to include the same band of vinyl shake material on the rear side of the building that is shown on north, east and west sides. 13. The landscape plan shall be revised by the Applicant to relocate the two proposed Northwood Red Maple trees on the west end of the site to the east end of the site between the driveway and the property line parallel with the townhome building. 14. If the existing Ash tree that is to remain on the west side of the building becomes damaged, diseased or dies during construction or at a later date, the Applicant or current owner agrees that it will replace it with a native tree that meets the City's minimum planting requirements. This statement shall be added by the Applicant to the planting notes on the landscape plan. Resolution No. 2008-15 2 April 1, 2008 15. Construction details shall be provided by the Applicant for the proposed retaining walls along the east and west property lines. The retaining walls must be architecturally compatible with the building. 16. In the event that the Applicant or future owner makes an application to the City to construct additional units on the rear portion of the site at a later date and the application is approved by the City, the Applicant agrees that the additional units will be compatible with the architectural character and the housing type (multi -family townhome units) of the existing townhome building and will comply with all applicable ordinance standards in place at that time. 17. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement in a form that is satisfactory to the City to ensure completion of the improvements and development of the project with all City requirements. The development agreement shall be recorded at the County. 18. The Applicant shall enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement for the on -site stormwater management system in a form that is satisfactory to the City. The stormwater maintenance agreement shall establish a responsible party and be recorded. 19. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the application and related documents. Dated: April 1, 2008 Attest: Chad M. Adams, City Administrator - Clerk T. M. Crosby, Jr., M C The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Weir and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Crosby, Smith, Weir, Johnson, Cavanaugh and the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2008-15 3 April 1, 2008 EXHIBIT A The Subject Property is legally described as follows: That part of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision Number 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point where the East line of Lot 9 extended north intersects with the centerline of County Road 9, said point being 1091.5 feet north of the Southeast corner of said Lot 9; thence southwesterly 125 feet along the centerline of said road; thence south parallel with the East line of said Lot 9, a distance of 348.5 feet; thence northeasterly parallel with the centerline of said County Road 9, a distance of 125 feet to the East line of said Lot 9; thence north to the point of beginning, subject to road. Resolution No. 2008-15 4 April 1, 2008