HomeMy Public PortalAboutCity Council_Minutes_1986-05-06_Regular 1986CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
MAY.6, 1986
1 INITIATION:
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Atkins called the regular meeting of the City Council
to order at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 6, 1986, in the Council
Chamber.
2. The invocation was given by Reverend Charles Woodworth, First
United Methodist Church, 5957 North Golden West Avenue.
3. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Atkins.
4. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmen- Dennis, Froehle, Gillanders, Swain,
Atkins
Absent: Councilmen -None
Also Present: City Manager Koski, City Attorney Martin,
Planning Director Shaw, Parks and Recreation
Director Kobett and Julie Estrada of the Temple
City Times
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Councilman Froehle requested that item B. (2) be removed from the
Consent Calendar, and Councilmen Swain and Gillanders requested
items J. and Q. respectively be removed.
On motion by Councilman Dennis, seconded by Councilman Froehle,
the remaining consent items were unanimously approved as recommended.
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 15, 1986
Approved as written.
B. RECOMMENDATIONS FROM PARKS.& RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING
OF APRIL 16, 1986
(2) REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE - TEMPLE CITY PONY
LEAGUE
Council authorized appropriation of funds for the pur-
chase of portable fencing at Oak Avenue School at a
cost not to exceed $1,500 and amended the adopted bud-
get. Purchase of the fencing was approved in the
interest of safety for the players and spectators,
and also that sports facilities for teenagers are not
available on City property.
C. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO RECRUIT FOR SUMMER RECREATION
STAFF
Council approved request of Parks and Recreation Director
to recruit necessary personnel to conduct a seven -week summer
vacation recreation program at Live Oak Park and five ele-
mentary school playgrounds from June 30 to August 15, 1986.
1 220
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 2
D. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK - TENNIS COURT RESURFACING - DAVIS &
DALEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
City Council accepted the work performed on the four tennis
courts at Live Oak Park by Davis & Daley Construction;
authorized payment by joint check to Davis & Daley and
Linemaster, a sub- contractor, in the amount of $4,229.10;
instructed City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion and
release of 10% retention in the amount of $969.90 at the
end of the 35 -day lien period; and release of Certificate
of Deposit #f81630 at the end of the lien period.
E. AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM WITH TEMPLE
CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Approval was given and Mayor and City Clerk authorized to
sign an agreement with the Temple City Unified School Dis-
trict for the City to conduct a supervised recreation pro-
gram within the limits of the City and upon the grounds of
Emperor School; that the School District shall make avail-
able facilities without charge; and that the City shall be
responsible to pay all charges it should incur with respect
to the operation of such a community recreation program.
F. AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM WITH EL MONTE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Approval was given and Mayor and City Clerk authorized to
sign an agreement with the El Monte Elementary School Dis-
trict for the City to conduct a supervised recreation pro -
gram upon the grounds of Cleminson School; that the District
will make available the facilities without charge; and the
City shall be responsible to pay all charges it should
incur with respect to the operation of such a community
recreation program.
G. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION - MEETING OF APRIL 22, 1986
Council received and filed the Planning Commission memo
relating to action taken at the Commission's April 22, 1986
meeting.
H. ORDINANCE NO. 86 -586 (SECOND READING) PROPOSED ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT TO THE TEMPLE CITY ZONING CODE REQUIRING A MINI-
MUM PARKING SPACE SIZE OF 10 FT. BY 20 FT. FOR ALL PARKING
SPACES WITHIN ENCLOSED GARAGES, REGARDLESS OF ZONE CLASSI-
FICATION
Council waived further reading and adopted Ordinance No.
86 -586, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMPLE CITY AMENDING SECTION 9296 OF THE TEMPLE CITY ZONING
CODE RELATING TO PARKING SPACE SIZE WITHIN ENCLOSED GARAGES.
I. ORDINANCE NO. 86 -585 (SECOND READING) REQUEST FOR APPROVAL
OF CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -1 TO R -2 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
4840 GLICKMAN AVENUE
Council waived further reading and adopted Ordinance No.
86 -585, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
. TEMPLE CITY APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -1 TO R -2
(Z.C. 86 -782).
21 9
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 3
K. CONTRACT EXTENSION AND FEE SCHEDULE INCREASE RE: STREET
SWEEPING SERVICES - COMMUNITY DISPOSAL COMPANY
City Council approved the extension of the current street
sweeping contract through June 30, 1987; approved an in-
crease of 38 cents per mile effective July 1, 1986; and
authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to sign.
L. ACCEPTANCE OF BID - CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK REPAIR AND
CONSTRUCTION OF WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS, PROJECT 85/86 -1
Council accepted the low bid for Project 85/86 -1 for side-
walk repair and construction of wheel chair ramps from
Damon Construction in the amount of $30,603.75;. and author-
ized the Mayor and City Clerk to sign.
M. RENEWAL OF GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - LOS ANGELES COUNTY
City Council adopted Resolution No. 86 -2433, A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AUTHORIZING
RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CON-
CERNING GENERAL SERVICES.
N. RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT OF EXAMINATION OF TRACT MAPS AND PAR-
CEL MAPS - LOS ANGELES COUNTY
City Council adopted Resolution No. 86- 2434, A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE AUTHORIZING
RENEWAL OF CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CONCERN-
ING EXAMINATION OF TRACT MAPS AND PARCEL MAPS; and author-
ized the Mayor and City Clerk to sign.
0. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -2429 ORDERING ENGINEER'S REPORT, FY 1986-
87 LEVY FOR CITY -WIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT
Council adopted Resolution No. 86 -2429, A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ORDERING AN ENGIN-
EER'S REPORT FOR THE 1986 -87 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY FOR THE
CITY -WIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT.
P. PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTING SERVICES - FINANCE DATA PROCESSING
SYSTEM
Council accepted Phase I of the proposal submitted by
McGladrey, Hendrickson .& Pullen in the amount of $5,000 for
consulting services for the Finance Department's data pro-
cessing system.
R. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -2431: EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL
Council adopted Resolution No. 86 -2431, a Resolution
appointing budgeted personnel.
S. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -2432: WARRANTS AND DEMANDS
Council adopted Resolution No. 86 -2432, a Resolution to pay
bills.
B. (1) REQUEST FOR USE OF FACILITIES AT LIVE OAK PARK -
TEMPLE CITY GIRL SCOUTS
Councilman Froehle inquired if there was going to be an
adult who would stay awake the night of the overnight
campout at Live Oak 'Park.
Parks and Recreation Director responded that there
would be an adult staying up the whole night, and the
Sheriff's Department have been advised.
2:18
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 4
Councilman Froehle moved to approve the request of
the Temple City Girl Scouts to conduct a day camp and
one overnight campout June 23 through 27 at Live Oak
Park, seconded by Councilman Swain and unanimously
carried.
J RATE INCREASE RE: COMMUNITY DISPOSAL COMPANY SERVICE,
AMENDMENT #16
Councilman Swain requested that Mayor Atkins give an
explanation for the necessity of the increase in rates
since he is the City's representative on the County Sani-
tation District.
Mayor Atkins advised that the reasons for the increase are
that Southern California is running out of dump space; and
that the State and Federal government is mandating more
control over how the dumps are operated and monitoring the
gasses. He pointed out that within our County Sanitation
District fees range from $5.50 per ton to $8.00 per ton;
and that fees in large cities in other states pay up to
$30 per ton in Baltimore and $50 per ton in Philadelphia.
Councilman Swain moved to approve the rate increase from
Community Disposal Company of 75 cents per single family .
residence and 40 cents for each additional unit effective
July 1, 1986; and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to
sign, seconded by Councilman Dennis and unanimously carried.
Q. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: DEBORAH URQUIDI
Councilman Gillanders brought to Council's attention the
fact that it involved a. County vehicle, therefore, was not
a City problem.
Councilman Swain moved to deny the claim for damages and
referred the matter to Southern California Joint Powers
Insurance Authority, seconded by Councilman Dennis and
unanimously carried.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. 86 -584 (SECOND READING)
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE 1985 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELEC-
TRICAL CODE (TITLE 27)
City Manager Koski provided background information stat-
ing that on April 1, 1986, the City Council introduced
Ordinance No. 86 -584 for first reading by title only and
set the matter for public hearing. The ordinance adopts
the 1985 Los Angeles County Electrical Code. The State
Housing Law requires that the local jurisdiction adopt the
same electrical regulations as contained in the State Hous
ing Regulations within one year from the effective date of
the State adoption. Differences with State regulations
are limited by State law to those that are reasonably
necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topo-
graphical conditions.
Mayor Atkins declared the public hearing open and invited
anyone wishing to address the subject to come forward.
As no one wished to address Council on the matter, Coun-
cilman Gillanders moved to close the public hearing,
seconded by Councilman Froehle and unanimously carried.
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 5
Councilman Gillanders moved to waive further reading and
adopt Ordinance No. 86 -584, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AMENDING SECTION 7300 OF THE
TEMPLE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELECTRICAL CODE AS CONTAINED IN THE 1985
EDITION OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELECTRICAL CODE, seconded
by Councilman Dennis and unanimously carried.
7. NEW BUSINESS:
A. PUBLIC HEARING: APPEAL OF DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING A REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 17616 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -781; APPLICANT /OWNER: MURSOL,
INC.; APPELLANT: KENNETH AND ELLY GIBSON
City Manager stated that on April 15, 1986, the City re-
. ceived an appeal from Kenneth and Elly Gibson regarding a
decision by the Planning Commission approving a request for
a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Parcel Map to allow
development of four residential condominium dwelling units
on .46 acres in the R -2 zone. The Planning Commission
found the site to be adequate in size and shape and to have
adequate access to streets; that the use would not have an
adverse effect upon the use, enjoyment and valuation of
adjacent property; and that the Tentative Parcel Map is
consistent with the General Plan and all aspects of the
Subdivision Map Act. Commission determined that the pro-
ject would complement the neighborhood by meeting all zoning
requirements and maintaining a one - story height; that the
open space exceeded that which is required by Code and
was adequate; that the project meets minimum parking
standards which is adequate; and that the CC & R's asso-
ciated with the tract map ensure adequate maintenance of
the project.
Mayor Atkins declared the public hearing open and invited
anyone wishing to address the subject to come forward.
Kenneth Gibson, 6023 North Kauffman Avenue, claimed that
the proposed development has inadequate areas in which
children may play; that the project would increase the
crime rate and the parking and traffic problems on the
street; that Temple City schools are already overcrowded;
and that the property would not be maintained and allowed
to deteriorate.
John Muha, 6128 North Kauffman Avenue, stated that he did
not like the change of the City's image with the increase
of condominiums being built lately; and that the City is
becoming overcrowded on, the streets and in the schools.
Richard Wenzel, 6027 North Kauffman, stated that crime is
already a problem in the neighborhood and felt it would
increase with more condominiums; and that there would be
a shortage of parking available on the street.
Sharon Smith, 6037 North Kauffman Avenue, said that she
is concerned about the trend that seems to be taking
place in the City with the increase in condominium con-
struction.
Gordon Fisher, 4752 North Kauffman Avenue, reiterated the
concerns already expressed by the residents who spoke be-
fore.
1LS 216
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 6
Pete Weise, 6119 North Oak, stated that people have moved
into Temple City because it has been known for its single
family homes; however, the character of the city is now
changing and residents are upset at seeing this change take
place because they feel that the value of their property,
its use and enjoyment is being threatened.
Carla Carroll, 6109 North Primrose, requested that an en-
vironmental impact study be prepared for the north side of
Temple City in light of the many recent condominium pro-
jects in that part of the City. She reiterated the point
that other residents had voiced that her property value is
being affected.
Mayor Atkins reminded Mrs. Carroll that a study is presently
underway for the whole City and that a separate study for
only a section of the community would not be completed any
faster.
Councilman Froehle advised Mrs. Carroll that, if a builder
wants to build in Temple City, the City Council cannot de-
prive the builder of his right to build if the project is
within the General Plan of the City. The best that the City
Council can do for all residents is to control or mitigate
these projects by requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
Councilman Swain advised that the property under discussion
is actually two lots in an R -2 zone and could have four
residences on the property, each lot having a house in front
and a house in back.
Richard Reese, president, Mursol,_ Inc., 43 -D East Hunting-
ton Drive, Arcadia 91006, advised that his company could
build five units on the parcel of property, but they opted
for a development that would be in keeping with the neigh-
borhood and would have the least amount of impact. There
are presently two homes on the lot and, therefore, the net
impact of the proposed development is two additional homes.
There is sufficient parking space available on the lot and
would not create parking problems on the street. Mr. Reese
feels his development will enhance the property values of
adjacent properties rather than having a negative effect.
Mr. Gibson responded to comments made by Mr. Reese saying
that it would be preferable to see four homes going up
rather than a four -unit condominium because it is Mr. Gib -
son's opinion that condominium owners will not continue
with the upkeep of the units or grounds.
As no one else wished to address Council, Councilman Gil -
landers moved to close the public hearing, seconded by
Councilman Froehle and unanimously carried.
Councilman Swain advised that she had spoken with the
Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Bosson, the other morning
and was advised by him that the schools are no where near
capacity in Temple City, and enrollment is about 400 below
what it has been at times in the past. Therefore, the
developments or proposed development do not or would not have a
adverse impact on the school enrollment. She did not believe
a condominium owner would be different from a home owner
with respect to the care and upkeep of property. Council-
man Swain felt that the proposed development was entirely
in keeping with the neighborhood and blended in very well.
Councilman Dennis asked that City Attorney Martin define
for those present what a Conditional Use Permit is.
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 7
City Attorney Martin responded saying that the purpose of a
Conditional Use Permit is to insure that the proposed use
will be rendered compatible with other existing and permitted
uses located in the general area. A use permitted by Condi-
tional Use Permit is anticipated by the City Zoning Code and
is only reviewed by the Planning Commission and /or City
Council to determine: (1) whether the site is adequate in
size, shape and topography; (2) whether the site has suffi-
cient access to streets and highways; and (3) whether the
proposed use will have an adverse effect upon the use, enjoy-
ment or valuation of adjacent property or upon the public
welfare.
Councilman Dennis stated that it is vital to him that he pro-
tect the rights of all property owners, allowing them to
develop their property as they see fit as long as it is not
detrimental to the neighborhood. And, in his opinion, the
development under discussion would enhance the neighborhood
and increase property values. He felt that Mursol is a
responsible builder, proposing a one - story, four -unit condo-
minium, which is 20 per cent less than what he would be
allowed to build on the parcel of land. It was Councilman
Dennis's opinion that the builder is considering the neigh -
borhood.in which he is developing and would see no reason to
deny the Conditional Use Permit.
Councilman Gillanders concurred with points raised by Coun-
cilmen Swain and Dennis, and was also in favor of the proposed
development.
Councilman Froehle concurred with Council members.
Mayor Atkins advised that in the past eight years the popu-
lation of Temple City has increased by'150 people per year.
Therefore, it would appear that the condominium construction
which has taken place in the City has not caused any over-
crowding. It was the Mayor's opinion that the proposed
development would enhance the neighborhood and, therefore,
would be a welcome addition, to the community.
Mr. Martin stated that his summary of the Council's findings
would be inserted in the Minutes, at this place, as follows.
The negative declaration is approved and the CUP granted on
a finding of: (1) no impact on schools in that all schools
in the area. are operating below capacity (and below high
water mark); (2) 'no depreciation of neighborhood in that the
increase is only two net houses and those are condos with
pride of ownership and maintenance; (3) the zoning is R -2 and
this comports; (4) the developer, has provided many incentives
such as lower density than permitted; (5) no impact on utili-
ties; (6) no economic loss proven; and (7) no impact on
streets or parking proven.
Councilman Gillanders moved to affirm the decision of the
Planning Commission in granting a Tentative Parcel Map and
Conditional Use Permit to Murso1, Inc. for development of a
residential four -unit condominium. located at 6024 Kauffman
Avenue, seconded by Councilman Dennis and unanimously carried.
City Attorney Martin. inquired if the Council would, like a
response to the query, "what rights do the people . have to
stop a development such as the proposed condominium ?"
Council members responded affirmatively.
4
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 8
City Attorney Martin advised that the Supreme Court has
ruled that a city's General Plan is, in effect, the consti-
tution or "Bible" of the city and the city is obligated to
follow it. Temple City's General Plan was adopted approxi-
mately 18 years ago after a long study conducted by pro-
fessional planners. No condominium or apartment building
may be built in an area designated R -1. The Zoning Map
of the City makes an honest effort to follow the General
Plan. Up until recently a homeowner wanting to developiin
an R -2 zone did so by permit received over`the counter from
the Planning Department. About six months ago the City
recognized that there was a problem developing and so a
Conditional Use Permit was required, making it mandatory
that the proposed development of a piece of property be
reviewed by the Planning Commission. If the request for a
CUP is not in the best interest of the community, then the
Commission could deny them under an appropriate ordinance.
Mr. Martin stated that, if zoning needs to be changed, then
it should be changed; but, until the change is made, the
General Plan and Zoning Map must be followed. If a change
in the Zoning Map or General Plan is desired, residents
may do so with rights of an initiative.
8. COMMUNICATIONS:
A. -EL MONTE SCHOOL DISTRICT RE: OVERCROWDING OF SCHOOLS
Council received a report which was given to the El Monte
City School District by Dr. Duane Dishno, Superintendent,
on April 15, 1986, regarding the overcrowding problem in
the El Monte School District and possibilities available
to alleviate the problem.
B. CARLA A. CARROLL, 6109 NORTH PRIMROSE RE: NEW DUPLEX CON-
STRUCTION AT 6018 NORTH PRIMROSE
Councilman Swain moved to refer the matter to a Study Session
immediately following the City Council meeting, seconded by
Councilman Froehle and unanimously carried.
9. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE 'WHO WISH TO SPEAK:
Bruce A. Dumbacher, 9460 East'Ardendale Avenue, Arcadia 91006,
advised that he directed correspondence to the Mayor regarding
a high density condominium project planned for a piece of land
which lies in Los Angeles County territory but which is within
the sphere of influence of Temple City.
Mayor Atkins acknowledged receipt of the letter and advised
Mr. Dumbacher that Planning Director Shaw has sent correspon-
dence to the Impact Analysis Section of the Los Angeles County
Department of Regional Planning opposing the construction and
Councilman Dennis has been in touch with Supervisor Schabarum's
office
Councilman Gillanders moved to support the letter of opposition
to Project No. 86087- TT. No. 31658 at 9429 East Camino Real
Avenue and 6746 -6752 Oak Avenue sent to the Impact Analysis
Section of the Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning
by Planning Director Shaw, seconded by Councilman Dennis and
unanimously carried.
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 9
RECESS TO CRA:
At this time Council recessed to meet as the Temple City Com-
munity Redevelopment Agency; approved the Minutes of the April
15, 1986 meeting; adopted Resolutions No. CRA 270 and 271 with
respect to condemnation of certain property within the Rosemead
Boulevard Redevelopment Project; adopted Resolution No. CRA 268
approving the assessment for fiscal year 1986 -87 and ordering
the report filed with the City Council; approved payment on
behalf of the City for rent obligation in the amount of
$139,333.65; and adopted Resolution No. CRA 269 approving war-
rants and demands in the amount of $292.17.
10. ACTION ON REQUEST BY CRA:
A. LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN BENEFITED PROPERTIES
WITHIN THE ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
City Manager Koski advised that pursuant to CRA Resolution
No. CRA 268 and the levying of special assessments for certain
benefited properties within the Rosemead Redevelopment
Project Area, the Agency is required annually to order filed
with the City Council a report relating to indebtedness of
the Agency and its tax revenues allocated to pay incurred
indebtedness within the project area.
Councilman Gillanders moved to adopt Resolution No. 86 -2430,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN BENEFITED PROPERTIES
WITHIN THE ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA,
seconded by Councilman Froehle and unanimously carried.
11. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS:
A. REQUEST FROM TEMPLE CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR INCREASE
IN CONTRACT PAYMENTS
Councilman Gillanders moved to increase the base contract
price with the Temple City Chamber of Commerce to $1,916
per month to cover additional office space effective Decem-
ber 1, 1985; and increase the modified base contract price
to $3,749 per month effective April 1, 1986 to provide for
additional clerical staff, seconded by Councilman Swain and
unanimously carried.
B. CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION BOARD MEETING -
SACRAMENTO, MAY 14 -15, 1936
Councilman Gillanders moved to approve Councilman Dennis's
attendance at the California Contract Cities Association's
Board Meeting in Sacramento May 14 and 15, 1936, and author-
ized necessary expenditures, seconded by Councilman Swain
and unanimously carried.
C. COMMUNITY PARKLANDS ACT OF 1986, RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF
PROPOSITION 43
City Manager Koski referred to staff correspondence directed
to the City Council in the May 2 Friday Memo regarding the
subject. Mr. Koski stated that, should the proposition pass,
the Bond Act will be in effect July of 1986, and will pro-
vide funds for community parks and park development. The
Parks and Recreation Commission has gone on record as support-
ing this issue.
Councilman Dennis adamantly opposed any more bond issues
by the State of California since it appears that citizens
pay double what is actually given by the State.
I 212
Council Minutes, May 6, 1986 - Page 10
The majority of the City Council expressed opposition to
the proposed Proposition 43 and would, therefore, not sup-
port Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation.
D. HISTORY OF TEMPLE CITY PRESENTATION - MARIE KLEIN AND
CHERYL CATES
Councilman Froehle inquired about the availability of the
slide presentation put together by Marie Klein and Cheryl
Cates of the Temple City Unified School District on the
.history of Temple City. It was Councilman Froehle's hope
that the slide presentation would be publicized and made
available to schools and organizations within the community
City Manager Koski assured Councilman Froehle that staff
would follow up on this matter.
12. ADJOURNMENT:
On motion by Councilman Swain, seconded by Councilman Froehle,
the meeting adjourned to a Study Session with a group of con-
cerned citizens at 10:05 p.m. Next meeting of the City Council
will be held on Tuesday, May 20, 1986, at 7:30 p.m.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Chief De ty City C
r