HomeMy Public PortalAbout03/06/1984D R A F T
bdAUMONT PLANNING COMMION CITY OFBEAUMONT
PLANKLPLARTMENT
MINUTES- OF "` FIL KOOPY
D REMOVE
MARCH 6, 1984 - '
I
1. The Beaumont Planning Commission met in a regular meeting at 7:05
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, Beaumont Civic Center, on
Tuesday, March 6, 1984, with Chairman Berg presiding.
2. On Roll Call the following Commissioners were present: Thompson,
Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp and Chairman Berg.
3. The Minutes of Regular Planning Commission meeting of February 21,
1984 were approved as submitted.
4. Planning Director's Comments on Agenda Sequence and /or Extra Agenda
items.
The Planning Director informed the Commission there were two extra
agenda items to be added to the agenda. Hershey Door Co., Inc. to
be heard as Agenda Item No. 5 and Precision Stamping to be heard as
Agenda Item No. 6.
NEW ITEMS:
1. 84 -ND- 3/84 -DP -2 - Redlands Federal Savings and Loan.
The proposed Negative Declaration for this project was presented
by the Planning Director and reviewed by the Planning Commission.
On Motion by Commissioner Schuelke, second by Commissioner Medina,
the Planning Commission found Negative Declaration 84 -ND -3 complete.
AYES: Commissioners Thompson, Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp
and Chairman Berg.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
The staff report containing the project description, background and
proposed Conditions of Approval was reviewed by the Planning Com-
mission with questions being answered by the Planning Director.
Commissioner Thompson questioned whether or not the City Engineer
would require the curb line setback to be increased on Beaumont
Avenue, pointing out the fact that Beaumont Avenue lacked ten feet
being wide enough to allow turnpockets to be utilized. Mr. Manee
advised Lhe City Engineer will be requiring only a minor radius
.modification.
Commissioner Remy inquired about the alley access and Commissioner
Medina asked about the condition of the water and sewer lines in
the alley, stating the paving should not be cut after completion.
Page 1
Beaumont rlanning wnunissLou
Ma h 6, 1984
In answer to a question from Commissioner Thompson, the Redlands
Federal representative stated the architectural design, including
the blue roof, will be the same for the Beaumont facility as that
presently existing in Banning.
On Motion by Commissioner Remy, second by Commissioner Schuelke,
the Planning Commission approved 84 -DP -2 with Conditions of
Approval as shown on Map Sheets A -1 and A -3.
AYES: Commissioners Thompson, Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp
and Chairm, berg.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
2. 84 -ND -4/84 -CUP -1 - Fraternal Order of the Eagles, Aerie No. 3768.
The background regarding this application for a Conditional Use
Permit, and the proposed Negative Declaration,.was verbally sub-
mitted to the Commission by the Planning Director.
On Motion by Commissioner Thompson, second by Commissioner Schuelke,
the Planning Commission found the Negative Declaration appears to
be full and complete.
AYES: Commissioners Thompson, Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp
and Chairman Berg.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
Questions from the Commission concerning any adverse effects on the
other businesses in this location caused by allowing this facility
to operate were satisfactorily answered by the Planning Director.
Mr. Tom Daniels, owner of the building, addressed the Planning
Commission stating he felt this would be a good use for the building,
and would create no problems for the neighboring businesses.
Mr. "Doc" Barker, representing the Eagles Lodge, addressed the
Commission giving information relative to the operation of the
facility.
On Motion by Commissioner Thompson, second by Commissioner Tapp, the
Planning Commission approved 84 -CUP -1 with the Conditions of Appro-
val amended by adding the following:
13.12 - The CUP to be returned to the Commission annually
for review of compliance with conditions.
13.13 - After one year's operation, the applicant may
apply for public invitation activities.
Page 2
3.
4.
5.
Beaumont rianning t,ommisslon
March 1984
84 -V -1 - Neal J. Baker Enterprises, Inc.
The Planning Director again presented his staff report containing
the project description, background, Conditions of Approval and
his recommendation.
Concern was expressed by Commissioner Remy that the situation of
the houses being too close together could cause problems in allowing
emergency vehicles or sewer repair vehicles access to the back of
the residences.
Mr. Lymon Burhop, 1162 Pennsylvania, addressed the Commission in
favor of the project.
Mr. Simoff addressed the Commission stating he did not feel there
was sufficient justification for the variance.
on Motion by Commissioner Schuelke, second by Commissioner Medina,
the Planning Commission approved 84 -V -1.
AYES: Commissioners Thompson, Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp
and Chairman Berg.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
84 -PM -1 - Brey Electric.
Jerry Brey, of Brey Electric, addressed the Commission, requesting
they consider deleting the requirement for sidewalks.
The alternatives to requiring the sidewalk installation at this
time were discussed by the Commission.
It was determined that since there were existing residences on
the lots with existing landscaping, shrubbery, etc., the City
would not gain that much by requiring the sidewalks be installed
at this time so long as the curb and gutter are installed.
On Motion by Commissioner Thompson, second by Commissioner Medina,
the Planning Commission approved 84 -PM -1 with the Conditions of
Approval amended to delete the requirement for sidewalks.
AYES: Commissioners Thompson, Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp
and Chairman Berg.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
84 -SP -1 - Hershey Door Co., Inc.
There was lengthy discussion concerning the request of the City
Manager to continue this agenda item and the legal ramifications
to the City if approval were given.
Page 3 r. r„
Lca uuW Ut, cinuuiuy ...�., u.,a oaly„
March r 1984
On Motion by Commissioner Thompson, second by Commissioner Remy,
the Planning Commission concurred with the action by the Planning
Director that this project be given a Land Use Clearance, with or
without conditions based on legal findings, and that the project
not return to the Planning Commission, but requesting that a re-
port be made to the Commission by the Planning Director.
AYES: Commissioners Thompson, Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp
and Chairman Berg.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
6. 84 -SP -2 - Precision Stamping.
On Motion by Commissioner Thompson, second by Commissioner Medina,
the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Director in
regards to this project, and determines that it is a candidate
for fast track processing with no need to return to the Commission.
AYES: Commissioners Thompson, Schuelke, Remy, Medina, Tapp
and Chairman Berg.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
Page 4