Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06/05/1984BEAUMONT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 5, 1984 The Beaumont Planning Commission met in a regular meeting on Tues- day, June 5, 1984, in the City Council Chambers, with Chairman Berg presiding: 1. Call to Order at 7:05 P.M. 2. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was observed. 3. On Roll Call the following Commissioners were present: Shaw, Tapp, Thompson, Schuelke, and Chairman Berg. Let the record show Commissioner Remy and Medina arrived after roll call. 4. The Minutes of Regular Planning Commission Meeting of May 22, 1984 were approved as submitted. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS: Item 4 OUT OF SEQUENCE (a) Site Plan Review - 773 Edgar Avenue - Robert Taylor, Applicant The Hearing was opened by the Planning Director at 7:08 P.M. Those speaking from the audience in favor was an unidentified man who was a friend of the Taylor's. Questions from the Commission were answered by the Planning Director and Mr. Robert Taylor. There being no further proponents or opponents, the hearing was closed at 7:33 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Shaw, second by Commissioner Tapp for approval as presented by Planning Director with (d) under RECOMMENDATION added to read: "Meet all applicable Building Codes." Further, that it be presented with a note to the City Council for them to consider an Urgency Ordinance in regard to placement of Mobilehomes and a follow -up with a permanent ordinance utilizing the prior ordinance and be returned back to the Planning Commission. To be placed on the Planning Commission's next agenda for the meeting of June 19, 1984. AYES: Commissioners Shaw, Remy, Tapp, Medina and Chairman Berg. NOES: Commissioners Schuelke and Thompson ABSTAIN: None Item 2 OUT OF SEQUENCE Beaumont Planning Commission June 5, 1984 Item 2 (continued) the alley is done, that this piece of property is obligated to do their portion of the alley also - without any further controversy. When and if there is other improvement in the area, it would be required to do all the curbs and gutters to be compatible. Questions from the Commission were answered by the Planning Director and Mr. Albert Seeburger. There being no further proponents or opponents the hearing was closed at 7:53 P.M. Motion was made by Commissioner Thompson, second by Com- missioner Remy that a six (6) month extension be granted with the amended conditions as follows: No. 3 (A) Delete - An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed. (B) Delete - three (3) and replace with two (2) driveway aprons on Tenth Street shall be removed and replaced with concrete curb and gutter. No. 10 Delete - The occupancy permit shall be issued without the completion of off -site improvements on 10th Street. From the time of occupancy the owner shall have six (6) months within which the off -site improvements shall not have to be made. AYES: Commissioners Shaw, Remy, Schuelke, Tapp and Thompson. NOES: Chairman Berg and Commissioner Medina. ABSTAIN: None. Item 3 Request for Review of Conditions - (83 -SP -8) Plot Plan 1043 - Nathan Guerriero The Hearing was opened by the Planning Director at 8:48 P.M. Those speaking from the audience were: Mr. Harvey Marcell, 461 W. Ramsey, Banning, spoke in favor and explained situation and asked for reconsideration on improvements. Questions from the Commission were answered by the Planning Director and Mr. Nathan Guerriero. There being no further proponents or opponents the hearing _.._ _ _, --- A _. n . nn n u Beaumont Planning Commission June 5, 1984 Item 1 OUT OF SEQUENCE Zoning Ordinance Amendments (a) O -S (Open Space) Motion by Commissioner Thompson, second by Commissioner Schuelke to bring the O -S Zone back before the Commission at a later date to be processed. (b) R -A (Residential - Agricultural) Motion by Commissioner Thompson and second by Commissioner Schuelke to bring the R -A Zone back before the Commission at a later date to be processed. (c) RHD (Residential Housing Development) Motion was made by Commissioner Thompson and second by Commissioner Schuelke that the Planning Commission finds that adoption of the pro- posed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission approves the RHD Zone and recommends the City Council adopt same. (d) C -G (Commercial - General) Motion was made by Commissioner Thompson second by Commissioner Schuelke that the Planning Commission finds that adoption of the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission approves the C -G Zone and recommends the City Council adopt same. (e) I -P (Industrial Park) Motion was made by Commissioner Thompson second by Commissioner Schuelke that the Planning Commission finds that adoption of the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and re- commends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission approves the I -P Zone and recommends the City Council adopt same. (f) PUD (Planned Unit Development) Motion was made by Commissioner Schuelke, second by Commissioner Remy that the Planning Commission finds that adoption of the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and re- commends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission approves the PUD Zone and recommends the City Council adopt same. J P a ning ftnmrrri s 'on Secretary