Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2008-071 Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval for High Pointe Ridge 2nd AdditionMember Weir introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2008-71 RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR HIGH POINTE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION, LOCATED EAST OF PARKVIEW DRIVE AND GENERALLY SOUTH OF HAMEL ROAD WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Mark E. Luetmer & Elizabeth R. Luetmer and Timothy Peter Druk & Julie Druk (collectively the "Owners") are, respectively, the owners of Lot 1, Block 1, High Pointe Ridge and Lot 2, Block 1, High Pointe Ridge (collectively the "Properties") in Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Owners applied to the City for approval of a plat which rearranges the common lot lines between the Properties; and WHEREAS, the city council granted preliminary approval of the plat, to be known as "High Pointe Ridge 2nd Addition," on September 2, 2008, subject to certain terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, the Owners have provided a final plat document consistent with those terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 2008, the city council reviewed the final plat for its conformance with the City's ordinances and the terms and conditions of preliminary approval, considered the recommendations of staff and heard comments from interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA, that approval be granted to the Owners for the final plat of High Pointe Ridge 2nd Addition, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. A plat is approved to rearrange the common lot lines of Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, High Pointe Ridge in accordance with the plat received by the City on September 24, 2008, except as amended by the City Council; 2. The Owners understand that the size and shape of the lots as rearranged are at their request and within their direct control. Any hardship, difficulty, or inconvenience in utilizing or developing these lots, now or in the future, will have been created by the Owners; Resolution No. 2008-71 October 21, 2008 3. The Owners shall meet the requirements of the plat opinion issued by the City Attorney on September 26, 2008; 4. Access to Lot 1 shall be granted via a shared driveway within the 67.5 foot wide portion of Lot 2 per the requirement of the Hennepin County Engineer; 5. The septic system for Lot 2 shall be located outside of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Conservation Easement in order to minimize impacts on this area during installation and future maintenance; 6. Approval of this plat does not include approval of construction or grading operations. The Owners shall abide by permitting procedures, and grading, erosion control, and construction plans shall be reviewed for compliance with relevant regulations and the conditions set forth herein; 7. Site grading for the future home on Lot 2 shall be similar to that proposed on the site plan received by the City on August 14, 2008; 8. Park dedication was determined when the High Pointe Ridge subdivision was approved and was due upon issuance of building permits. The Owners shall make arrangements which are satisfactory to the City to pay the outstanding park dedication fee for Lot 1 upon filing of the final plat of High Pointe Ridge 2nd Addition. Park dedication for Lot 2 shall be due upon issuance of a building permit on the lot; 9. The final plat shall be filed with Hennepin County Recorder within 120 days of the date of the city council resolution granting final approval or the final plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicant and approved by the city council; and 10. The Owners shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the final plat and related documents. Dated: October 21, 2008 . Crosby, Jr., ay r Attest: Jodi . Gallup, Deputy Cler The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Smith and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Resolution No. 2008-71 2 October 21, 2008 Weir, Smith, Cavanaugh, Johnson, Crosby and the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2008-71 3 October 21, 2008