Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
PKT-CC-2021-09-28
SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 4:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. ** THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON IN THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ** ** MASKS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING REQUIRED ** City Council Chambers 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Special City Council Meeting - 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. pkt-cc -2021 -09 -28 special meeting.pdf Regular City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance Citizens to Be Heard If you do not plan to attend in person but would still like to submit written comments for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/citizenstobeheard You must submit your comments by 7:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words. Presentations Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District Presentation chcssd county presentation.pdf Presentation by Patricia Trap, Superintendent of Southeast Utah Group Area National Parks Administrative Reports Acting City Manager Updates Mayor and Council Reports Approval of Minutes September 14, 2021, Regular Meeting min -cc -2021 -09 -14 draft.pdf Special Events Special Event Permit Application for Grand County Family Support Center's Trunk -of-Treat Briefing and possible action trunk or treat agenda summary.pdf trunk or treat family support center special event application.pdf rules and liabilty forms.pdf entry form.pdf Old Business Dispersed Parking Cooperative Agreement with UDOT Briefing and possible action dispersed parking cooperative agreement with udot agenda summary.pdf attachment 1 - dispersed parking cooperative agreement with udot.pdf attachment 2 - utah transportation commission meeting fact sheet.pdf attachment 3 - dispersed parking cost estimate.pdf attachment 4 - shuttle transit study.pdf Transit Pilot Cooperative Agreement with UDOT transit pilot cooperative agreement with udot agenda summary.pdf attachment 1 - transit pilot cooperative agreement with udot.pdf attachment 2 - utah transportation commission meeting fact sheet.pdf attachment 3 - financial plan for operations.pdf New Business Proposed Resolution 30 -2021: A Resolution Approving the Lot Line Adjustment of Property Located at 374 W 200 S, and 396 W 200 , Moab UT 84532 Briefing and possible action kopell lot line adjustment petition cc agenda summary 092821.pdf exhibit 1 draft resolution 00 -2021 kopell lla petition 092821.pdf exhibit 2 vicinity map kopell lla 092821.pdf exhibit 3 recorded county plat kopell lla 092821.jpg.pdf exhibit 5 state code 10 -9a -608.pdf exhibit 6 adjustment area detail kopell lla 092821.pdf Proposed Ordinance 2021 -12: An Ordinance Amending the Text of the Moab Municipal Code (MMC) to Add Regulation for Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries by Amending Sections 17.06 Definitions, 17.21.020 C -2 Commercial Residential Zone, 17.24.020 C -3 Central Commercial Zone, 17.27.020 C -4 General Commercial Zone, 17.31.020 RC Resort Commercial Zone and 17.36.020 Industrial Zone Briefing and possible action cc agenda report code amendments to brewery and distilleries.pdf exhibit a ordinance 2021 -12 draft 9.21.2021.pdf Proposed Ordinance 2021 -17: An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code Title 2 Chapter 28 Purchasing Procedures Briefing and possible action agenda summary - legal service contracts.pdf ordinance 2021 -17 amending the purchasing policy.pdf purchasing policy amendment redline.pdf Discussion regarding City Attorney Replacement Discussion regarding City Manager recruitment process Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Executive (Closed) Session Discussion of the Character, Professional Competence, or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual or Individuals Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1. Documents: 2. 3. 4. 5. 5.1. Documents: 5.2. 6. 6.1. 7. 8. 8.1. Documents: 9. 9.1. Documents: 10. 10.1. Documents: 10.2. Documents: 11. 11.1. Documents: 11.2. Documents: 11.3. Documents: 11.4. 11.5. 12. 13. 13.1. 14. SEPTEMBER 28, 2021SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 4:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M.REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M.** THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON IN THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. **** MASKS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING REQUIRED **City Council Chambers217 East Center StreetMoab, Utah 84532Special City Council Meeting - 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.pkt-cc -2021 -09 -28 special meeting.pdfRegular City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m.Call to Order and Pledge of AllegianceCitizens to Be HeardIf you do not plan to attend in person but would still like to submit written comments for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/citizenstobeheardYou must submit your comments by 7:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words. PresentationsCanyonlands Health Care Special Service District Presentationchcssd county presentation.pdfPresentation by Patricia Trap, Superintendent of Southeast Utah Group Area National ParksAdministrative ReportsActing City Manager Updates Mayor and Council Reports Approval of Minutes September 14, 2021, Regular Meeting min -cc -2021 -09 -14 draft.pdf Special Events Special Event Permit Application for Grand County Family Support Center's Trunk -of-Treat Briefing and possible action trunk or treat agenda summary.pdf trunk or treat family support center special event application.pdf rules and liabilty forms.pdf entry form.pdf Old Business Dispersed Parking Cooperative Agreement with UDOT Briefing and possible action dispersed parking cooperative agreement with udot agenda summary.pdf attachment 1 - dispersed parking cooperative agreement with udot.pdf attachment 2 - utah transportation commission meeting fact sheet.pdf attachment 3 - dispersed parking cost estimate.pdf attachment 4 - shuttle transit study.pdf Transit Pilot Cooperative Agreement with UDOT transit pilot cooperative agreement with udot agenda summary.pdf attachment 1 - transit pilot cooperative agreement with udot.pdf attachment 2 - utah transportation commission meeting fact sheet.pdf attachment 3 - financial plan for operations.pdf New Business Proposed Resolution 30 -2021: A Resolution Approving the Lot Line Adjustment of Property Located at 374 W 200 S, and 396 W 200 , Moab UT 84532 Briefing and possible action kopell lot line adjustment petition cc agenda summary 092821.pdf exhibit 1 draft resolution 00 -2021 kopell lla petition 092821.pdf exhibit 2 vicinity map kopell lla 092821.pdf exhibit 3 recorded county plat kopell lla 092821.jpg.pdf exhibit 5 state code 10 -9a -608.pdf exhibit 6 adjustment area detail kopell lla 092821.pdf Proposed Ordinance 2021 -12: An Ordinance Amending the Text of the Moab Municipal Code (MMC) to Add Regulation for Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries by Amending Sections 17.06 Definitions, 17.21.020 C -2 Commercial Residential Zone, 17.24.020 C -3 Central Commercial Zone, 17.27.020 C -4 General Commercial Zone, 17.31.020 RC Resort Commercial Zone and 17.36.020 Industrial Zone Briefing and possible action cc agenda report code amendments to brewery and distilleries.pdf exhibit a ordinance 2021 -12 draft 9.21.2021.pdf Proposed Ordinance 2021 -17: An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code Title 2 Chapter 28 Purchasing Procedures Briefing and possible action agenda summary - legal service contracts.pdf ordinance 2021 -17 amending the purchasing policy.pdf purchasing policy amendment redline.pdf Discussion regarding City Attorney Replacement Discussion regarding City Manager recruitment process Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Executive (Closed) Session Discussion of the Character, Professional Competence, or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual or Individuals Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1.Documents:2.3.4.5.5.1.Documents:5.2.6.6.1. 7. 8. 8.1. Documents: 9. 9.1. Documents: 10. 10.1. Documents: 10.2. Documents: 11. 11.1. Documents: 11.2. Documents: 11.3. Documents: 11.4. 11.5. 12. 13. 13.1. 14. SEPTEMBER 28, 2021SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 4:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M.REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M.** THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON IN THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. **** MASKS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING REQUIRED **City Council Chambers217 East Center StreetMoab, Utah 84532Special City Council Meeting - 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.pkt-cc -2021 -09 -28 special meeting.pdfRegular City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m.Call to Order and Pledge of AllegianceCitizens to Be HeardIf you do not plan to attend in person but would still like to submit written comments for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/citizenstobeheardYou must submit your comments by 7:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words. PresentationsCanyonlands Health Care Special Service District Presentationchcssd county presentation.pdfPresentation by Patricia Trap, Superintendent of Southeast Utah Group Area National ParksAdministrative ReportsActing City Manager UpdatesMayor and Council ReportsApproval of MinutesSeptember 14, 2021, Regular Meetingmin-cc -2021 -09 -14 draft.pdfSpecial EventsSpecial Event Permit Application for Grand County Family Support Center's Trunk -of-TreatBriefing and possible actiontrunk or treat agenda summary.pdftrunk or treat family support center special event application.pdfrules and liabilty forms.pdfentry form.pdfOld BusinessDispersed Parking Cooperative Agreement with UDOTBriefing and possible actiondispersed parking cooperative agreement with udot agenda summary.pdfattachment 1 - dispersed parking cooperative agreement with udot.pdfattachment 2 - utah transportation commission meeting fact sheet.pdfattachment 3 - dispersed parking cost estimate.pdfattachment 4 - shuttle transit study.pdfTransit Pilot Cooperative Agreement with UDOTtransit pilot cooperative agreement with udot agenda summary.pdfattachment 1 - transit pilot cooperative agreement with udot.pdfattachment 2 - utah transportation commission meeting fact sheet.pdfattachment 3 - financial plan for operations.pdfNew BusinessProposed Resolution 30 -2021: A Resolution Approving the Lot Line Adjustment of Property Located at 374 W 200 S, and 396 W 200 , Moab UT 84532Briefing and possible action kopell lot line adjustment petition cc agenda summary 092821.pdf exhibit 1 draft resolution 00 -2021 kopell lla petition 092821.pdf exhibit 2 vicinity map kopell lla 092821.pdf exhibit 3 recorded county plat kopell lla 092821.jpg.pdf exhibit 5 state code 10 -9a -608.pdf exhibit 6 adjustment area detail kopell lla 092821.pdf Proposed Ordinance 2021 -12: An Ordinance Amending the Text of the Moab Municipal Code (MMC) to Add Regulation for Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries by Amending Sections 17.06 Definitions, 17.21.020 C -2 Commercial Residential Zone, 17.24.020 C -3 Central Commercial Zone, 17.27.020 C -4 General Commercial Zone, 17.31.020 RC Resort Commercial Zone and 17.36.020 Industrial Zone Briefing and possible action cc agenda report code amendments to brewery and distilleries.pdf exhibit a ordinance 2021 -12 draft 9.21.2021.pdf Proposed Ordinance 2021 -17: An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code Title 2 Chapter 28 Purchasing Procedures Briefing and possible action agenda summary - legal service contracts.pdf ordinance 2021 -17 amending the purchasing policy.pdf purchasing policy amendment redline.pdf Discussion regarding City Attorney Replacement Discussion regarding City Manager recruitment process Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Executive (Closed) Session Discussion of the Character, Professional Competence, or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual or Individuals Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1.Documents:2.3.4.5.5.1.Documents:5.2.6.6.1.7.8.8.1.Documents:9.9.1.Documents:10.10.1.Documents:10.2.Documents:11.11.1. Documents: 11.2. Documents: 11.3. Documents: 11.4. 11.5. 12. 13. 13.1. 14. 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532-2534 Main Number (435) 259-5121 Fax Number (435) 259-4135 Emily S. Niehaus Tawny Knuteson-Boyd Rani Derasary Mike Duncan Karen Guzman- Newton Kalen Jones Mayor: Council: Memorandum To: Councilmembers and Media From: Mayor Emily S. Niehaus Date: 9/23/2021 Re: Special City Council Meeting The City of Moab will hold a Special Moab City Council Meeting on Tuesday, September 28, 2021, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. outdoors in the Moonstone Gallery (weather permitting) at 217 E. Center St., Moab, Utah. The purpose of this meeting will be: 1. Making Market-based Solutions Accessible for Sustainable Cities – Drawdown Fund CEO Erik Snyder - WORKSHOP 2. Electric-Ready Building Code Letter of Support – Briefing and possible action 3. Streetlight Conversion to Dark Sky Compliant Lighting (RMP) – Briefing and possible action Mayor Emily S. Niehaus In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC213E6A-B030-467D-A413-F02CBD90D341 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: September 28th, 2021 Title: Electric Ready Letter of Support Presenter: Mila Dunbar-Irwin Attachment(s): Letter of Support for Electric Ready Amendments to the Building Code Recommended Motion: I move to approve the letter of support for electric ready amendments to the Building Code and authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City of Moab. Background/Summary: Utah Clean Cities and Salt Lake City are soliciting support for an application to amend the Residential 2021 International Energy Conservation Code to include electric-ready provisions. These would include requiring all new buildings to have wiring and plugs for major appliances and electric vehicles. It does not specify which appliances must be used, simply that the wiring and plugs be installed at construction so the homeowner may choose at time of sale and into the future. The average cost for installation at time of construction is $1000 according to Utah Clean Cities research. The average cost for retrofits is much higher. The City of Moab has made a commitment to 100% renewable energy by 2030, and, in conjunction with other Utah communities and Rocky Mountain Power, is participating in the development process of utility-scale renewable energy to power our City. With all the power expected to come from renewables by 2030, including electric-ready wiring in new construction allows the homeowner to take advantage of renewable energy right from the start. The application for amendments will go before the Uniform Building Code Commission sometime before the end of this year. September 28, 2021 Chairmen Peterson Uniform Building Code Commission 160 East 300 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Letter from Interested Stakeholders to the UBCC to Approve Utah Clean Energy’s and Salt Lake City’s Joint Application to Incorporate Electric Readiness Provisions into the 2021 IECC Chairmen Peterson and Members of the Uniform Building Code Commission: On behalf of the City of Moab, we offer our support for Utah Clean Energy’s and Salt Lake City’s joint application to amend the residential 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) to include electric-ready provisions. Electric readiness empowers consumer choice in five key areas: home cooking, space heating, water heating, clothes drying, and electric vehicle ownership. The application does not require the installation of specific appliances—rather it empowers and protects consumer choice by making it simpler and much less expensive to install electric appliances in the future. Incorporating electric readiness into new construction allows homeowners, builders, and communities to budget for the electrification of homes and protects families from being burdened with costly retrofits to install electric appliances. Local analysis has found that making single-family homes “electric- ready” is over 4 times less expensive than retrofitting homes for electric-readiness after the fact.1 Electric readiness makes our communities safer. Recent research shows that the combustion of fossil fuels, such as natural gas, for cooking in our homes leads to negative health outcomes for families and communities.2 The burning of fossil fuels indoors creates pollution linked to higher rates of asthma in children and other respiratory and cardiological illnesses in adults. In addition, these are the same pollutants that when emitted into our atmosphere contribute to poor outdoor air quality. “Area source” emissions, which includes our homes and buildings, are expected to become the dominant category of local air emissions by 2024.3 Efficient use of electricity, which is increasingly being generated by pollution-free energy sources, like solar and wind power, represents a huge win for Utah communities. By making it easier to adopt electric appliances homeowners will protect Utah families and help conserve our airshed. 1 For more information, see the electric ready factsheet, available at https://utahcleanenergy.org/electric- ready-homes/ 2 See https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/sources-combustion-products, see also https://rmi.org/indoor-air-pollution-the-link-between-climate-and-health/. 3 Utah Division of Air Quality as reported by Heather May, The Salt Lake Tribune (2019): https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2019/08/26/homes-are-big-part-air/ Our communities need to be prepared for the transition from fossil fuel combustion to electricity, including at-home EV charging, 80% of which is expected to take place at home.4 Amending Utah’s residential energy code with electric-ready provisions protects consumer choice and sets our communities up for improved affordability when switching to electric appliances. Rather than burden homeowners with prohibitively expensive and time-consuming retrofits, the proposed electric-ready energy code amendment will help ensure our communities are ready for future installations of at-home EV chargers, high-efficiency heat pumps, and induction cooktops and ovens. The adoption of an electric-ready code during the 2021 code cycle is the logical next step in the modernization of our communities—there is no need to wait an additional six years for the next residential code cycle. Over the past few years, several all-electric buildings were completed by leading general contractors and each was more affordable than using a combination of gas and electric appliances. Moving to an electric-ready building code incentivizes all contractors, not just those comfortable with modern building technology, to be more productive with the same amount of capital. In addition, the shift to electric-readiness unlocks tremendous value for utility customers. This value comes from the increased use of the electricity distribution grid while maintaining the same fixed costs. In essence, when we use the same utility infrastructure to serve more homes it can create downward pressure on utility rates, helping to keep Utah’s electricity rates low for Utah businesses and families.5 The adoption of electric readiness standards is the first step to unlocking that potential value to customers. In summary, adopting an electric-ready code future proofs new residential construction so that homeowners aren’t burdened with costly retrofits when installing an electric appliance in the future. Incorporating electric readiness into new construction will catalyze adoption of new technology and empower consumer choice. Adoption of the electric-ready code provisions will make it easier for Utahns to adopt combustion-free technologies and protect both indoor and outdoor air quality, while increasing the value of our utility system. We urge you to approve the request to amend the residential 2021 International Energy Conservation Code, currently being reviewed for adoption in Utah, to include electric-ready provisions. Thank you for your consideration of the proposed electric-ready energy code amendment. 4 See https://www.energy.gov/eere/electricvehicles/charging-home 5 See, Eric Cutter et al., Energy+Environment Economics, Distribution Grid Cost Impacts Driven by Transportation Electrification, available at, https://www.ethree.com/wp- content/uploads/2021/06/GridLab_2035-Transportation-Dist-Cost.pdf, see also e.g., Order No. 88997 at 43, Public Service Commission of Maryland, https://dms.psc.sc.gov/Attachments/Matter/8243954b-ffc4- 4bb7-bbae-ff617c568b89 (agreeing in principle that “pairing EV adoption and EV charging with intelligent rate design can improve electric distribution system utilization and create downward pressure on rates through load management and system peak reduction.”) Respectfully submitted on behalf of the undersigned, Emily Niehaus Mayor City of Moab Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: September 28th, 2021 Title: Rocky Mountain Power Streetlight Dark Skies LED Conversion Presenter: Mila Dunbar-Irwin Attachment(s): RMP Estimate, Spec Sheets for GE Cobra Head ERLC Recommended Motion: I move to approve the Rocky Mountain Power streetlight conversion project for the attached estimate for replacing 419 streetlight heads with Dark Sky compliant LED lights. Background/Summary: The Moab City Council passed Ordinance #2019-03 on August 13, 2019, which established new standards for lighting within the City of Moab to “minimize light pollution, glare, light trespass, and sky glow, to curtail the destruction of the nighttime visual environment.” This is now known as the “Dark Sky Ordinance” and supports the City of Moab’s goals to become an International Dark Sky Community. In anticipation of the up-coming end to the five-year amortization period, Rocky Mountain Power is prepared to change over all City streetlights from high-pressure sodium, non-compliant heads to compliant, LED cobra heads. There are 419 of these lights within City limits. This will not include the decorative lights on Main Street, any privately owned lights, or County lights. The work could be done within the next few months and has already been contracted for by Rocky Mountain Power with crews ready. The cost has been budgeted for and will be recouped in 3 years due to the lower cost of power for LED lightbulbs. Worksheet Date:9/23/2021 RMP Rates Services Count of Lights Current Light Lumens Current Monthly Base Rate (per Unit) Current Monthly Total Post-LED Conversion All on Schedule 11 Count of Lights Proposed LED Lumens Proposed Monthly LED Base Rate Proposed LED Monthly Total Net Monthly Billing Difference HPS 70W - Functional 5 5,600 $11.82 $59.10 Level 1 Customer Funded Less than 3,500 $6.04 $0.00 $59.10 HPS 100W - Functional 202 9,500 $12.74 $2,573.48 Level 2 Customer Funded 339 3,501 - 5,500 $6.57 $2,227.23 $346.25 HPS 100W - Post-Top 4 9,500 $12.74 $50.96 Level 2 PT Customer Funded 6 3,501 - 5,500 $6.57 $39.42 $11.54 HPS 150W - Functional 136 16,000 $13.19 $1,793.84 Level 3 Customer Funded 5,501 - 8,000 $6.99 $0.00 $1,793.84 HPS 200W - Functional 0 22,000 $13.71 $0.00 Level 4 Customer Funded 74 8,001 - 12,000 $7.46 $552.04 -$552.04 HPS 250W - Functional 20 27,500 $14.60 $292.00 Level 5 Customer Funded 12,001 - 15,500 $8.00 $0.00 $292.00 HPS 400W - Functional 0 50,000 $17.75 $0.00 Level 6 Customer Funded 15,501 - Greater $9.72 $0.00 $0.00 MV 100W - Functional 0 4,000 $11.82 $0.00 Level 1 Customer Funded Less than 3,500 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 MV 175W - Functional 52 7,000 $11.82 $614.64 Level 1 Customer Funded Less than 3,500 $6.04 $0.00 $614.64 MV 250W - Functional 0 10,000 $12.74 $0.00 Level 2 Customer Funded 3,501 - 5,500 $6.57 $0.00 $0.00 MV 400W - Functional 0 20,000 $13.71 $0.00 Level 4 Customer Funded 8,001 - 12,000 $7.46 $0.00 $0.00 419 $5,384.02 419 $2,818.69 $2,565.33 ESTIMATED ANNUAL SAVINGS-->$30,783.96 Functional Conversion Project Count of Lights Labor Material Total Level 1 Less than 3,500 0 $72.31 $122.40 $0.00 Level 2 3,501 - 5,500 339 $72.31 $130.80 $68,854.29 Level 3 5,501 - 8,000 0 $72.31 $141.60 $0.00 Level 4 8,001 - 12,000 74 $72.31 $214.80 $21,246.14 Level 5 12,001 - 15,500 0 $72.31 $243.60 $0.00 Level 6 15,501 - Greater 0 $72.31 $264.00 $0.00 Level 2 Post-Top 3,501 - 5,500 6 $72.31 $361.20 $2,601.06 419 $92,701.49 Avg Cost per Light $221.24 Districts Included: American Fork, Cedar City, Dixie, Moab, Park City, Price, Richfield, Santaquin, Vernal City of / Customer:Moab City CSS Acct #58922956 001 CCT Choice:3000K or 4000K 3000K $92,701.49 3.01 Estimated Pricing ONLY Annual Savings $30,783.96 Years for R.O.I. ** PLS READ COMMENT Schedule 11 RMP Owned Streetlighting ARTERIALS & RESIDENTIAL - 200 - 499 FIXTURES - WHOLE CITY IN 2021 Project Cost ERLC-ERL1-ERLH-ERL2 Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Project Name Date Type Notes The Evolve® LED Roadway ERLC Luminaire is optimized utilizing advanced LED reflective optical system for local, collector and major roadways. The modern design incorporates the heat sink directly into the unit for heat transfer to prolong LED life. Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLC ) ELECTRICAL Input Voltage:120-277V (no 347-480V) Input Frequency:50/60Hz Power Factor: ≥ 90% at rated watts Total Harmonic Distortion: ≤ 20% at rated watts Lumens:2,000 - 7,000 Distribution:Type II Narrow, II/III3, III, V Efficacy:110-143 LPW CCT:2700K, 3000K, 4000K & 5000K CRI:≥ 70 OPTICAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION Housing:Aluminum die cast enclosure casting integral heat sink for maximum heat transfer Lens:Impact resistant tempered glass Paint: Corrosion resistant powder paint, ≥ 2.0 mil thickness (RAL & custom colors available) Standard = Black, Dark Bronze, Gray, White Optional = Coastal Finish Weight:8.5 lbs (5.6 kgs) LUMEN MAINTENANCE Projected Lxx per IES TM-21-11 at 25°C Lumen Codes Distributions LXX(10K) @ Hours 25,000 HR 50,000 HR 60,000 HR 02 ,03, 04, 05 V4 L96 L93 L93 06 V4 L94 L90 L88 Note: Projected Lxx based on LM80 (≥ 10,000 hour testing). Accepted Industry tolerances apply to initial luminous flux and lumen maintenance measurements. Lumen Codes Distributions LXX(10K) @ Hours 25,000 HR 50,000 HR 60,000 HR 02 ,03, 04, 05 A5, B5, C5 L97 L93 L92 06 A5, B5, C5 L96 L91 L89 07 A5, B5, C5 L95 L89 L87 Operating Temperature:-40°C to 50°C Vibration: 3G per ANSI C136.31-2018 LM-79:Testing in accordance with IES Standards RATINGS SURGE PROTECTION* Standard Optional 10kV/5kA Secondary 10kV/5kA (R Option) or Secondary 20kV/10kA (T Option) *Per ANSI C136.2-2018 WARRANTY 5 Year (Standard) 10 Year (Optional) CONTROLS Dimming:Standard - 0-10V Optional - DALI (Option U) Sensors:Photo Electric Sensors (PE) available LightGrid Compatible Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. Project Name Date Type Notes Catalog Logic Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLC ) SUGGESTED HID REPLACEMENT • Approximately 2,000 - 7,000 lumens to replace 50-100W HPS Cobra-head Note: actual replacement lumens may vary based upon mounting height, pole spacing, design criteria, etc. Previous Optical Pattern Latest New Optical Pattern A3 Type II Narrow A5 Type II Narrow B3 Type II Wide B5 Type II/III C3 Type III C5 Type III N/A Type V V4 Type V The information above is designed to provide a guideline to select the correct luminaire for a roadway application. The best and most accurate way to ensure the proper design is by doing a lighting layout. Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. PROD. ID VOLTAGE LUMENS DISTRIBUTION CCT CONTROLS PER ANSI C136.41 COLOR OPTIONS E = Evolve 0 = 120-2771 022 A5 = II Narrow 27 = 2700K4 A = 7-Pin Receptacle BLCK = Black B = Tether R = Roadway 8 = 120-2405 03 B5 = Type II/III3 30 = 3000K4 D = 7-Pin Receptacle with Shorting Cap DKBZ = Dark Bronze C1 = Captive Door L = Local 04 C5 = Type III 40 = 4000K E = 7 Pin Receptacle with Long Life non-Dimming PE Control5 GRAY = Gray F = Fusing C = Compact 1 = 120 05 V4 = Type V 50 = 5000K WHTE= White G = Internal Bubble Level 2 = 208 06 Note: 0-10V control standard unless DALI Option "U" requested L = Tool-Less Entry 3 = 240 07 M1 = MagnaPak9 4 = 277 R = Secondary 10kV/5kA SPD T = Secondary 20kV/10kA SPD U = DALI Programmable6 V1 = Field Adjustable Module1,8 Y = Coastal Finish7 XXX = Special Options 1 Not Available with Fusing 2 Lumen choice only offered for 120-240V 3 See ISO plots of the B5 Distribution 4 Select 2700K or 3000K CCT for IDA approved units 5 Only available with 02 Lumen Code 6 Compatible with LightGrid 7 Recommended for installations within 750 feet from coast. Lead time varies, check with factory. 8 Not available with DALI "U" option 9 Option M1 provides for MagnaPak – 40 Fixtures per MagnaPak Container. Single Pack box is standard E R L C_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ Project Name Date Type Notes Spec Tables Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLC ) LUMENOUTPUT DIST. LUMENS WATTAGE BUG RATINGS 4000K/5000K 3000K 2700K 120-277V 4000K/5000K 3000K 2700K 02 A5 2000 1940 1760 15 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B5 2000 1940 1760 15 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C5 2000 1940 1760 15 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 V4 1990 1950 1890 15 B1-U0-G0 B1-U0-G0 B1-U0-G0 03 A5 3000 2910 2640 22 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B5 3000 2910 2640 22 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C5 3000 2910 2640 22 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 V4 3100 3030 2950 23 B1-U0-G0 B1-U0-G0 B1-U0-G0 04 A5 4000 3880 3520 28 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B5 4000 3880 3520 28 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C5 4000 3880 3520 28 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 V4 4030 3940 3840 32 B2-U0-G0 B2-U0-G0 B2-U0-G0 05 A5 5000 4850 4400 36 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B5 5000 4850 4400 36 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C5 5000 4850 4400 36 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G1 V4 5200 5090 4950 43 B2-U0-G1 B2-U0-G1 B2-U0-G1 06 A5 6000 5820 5280 46 B2-U0-G2 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B5 6000 5820 5280 46 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 C5 6000 5820 5280 46 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 V4 6350 6220 6050 55 B2-U0-G1 B2-U0-G1 B2-U0-G1 07 A5 7000 6790 6160 56 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B5 7000 6790 6160 56 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 C5 7000 6790 6160 56 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 For additional information on ERLC IES files, please click one of the following links: Non-Shielded Shielded Project Name Date Type Notes ERLC Type II Narrow 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERLC_05A540___.IES ERLC Type II/III 3 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERLC_05B540___.IES ERLC Type III 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERLC_05C540___.IES ERLC Type V 5,200 Lumens 4000K ERLC_05V440___.IES Photometric Plots Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLC ) • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 999 1997 2996 3995 1 2 1 2912 1824 2736 3649 1033 2066 4131 1 2 3098 406 812 1219 1625 1 2 .1 .2 .5 .1 .2.5 .1 .2 .5 .1 .2 .5 3 This optic is designed to address a Roadway Photometric Application and may classify as Type II or III. Project Name Date Type Notes Mounting & Accessories Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLC ) MOUNTING • Adjustable for 1.25 to 2 in. nominal mounting pipe • Integral diecast mounting pipe stop • Slipfitter with +/- 5 degrees of leveling adjustment NETWORKED LIGHTING CONTROL Current's LightGrid TM Outdoor Lighting Control System is designed for Street and Roadway Applications. It enables remote monitoring, control, and asset management of a single fixture or a group of fixtures through a web enabled Central Management System. EFFECTIVE PROJECTED AREA • 0.3 sq ft max (0.029 sq m) WEIGHT • Approximate net weight: 8.5 lbs (3.8 kgs) ACCESSORIES SAP Number Part Number Description 93029237 PED-MV-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 120-277V 93029238 PED-347-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 347V 93029239 PED-480-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 480V 28299 PEC0TL Standard 120-277V XXXXXX PECHTL Standard 347-480V 73251 SCCL-PECTL Shorting Cap See pages 22 & 23 for more detailed information on ERLC Shields. Project Name Date Type Notes The Evolve® LED Roadway ERL1 Luminaire is optimized utilizing advanced LED reflective optical system for local, collector and major roadways. The modern design incorporates the heat sink directly into the unit for heat transfer to prolong LED life. Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL1 ) ELECTRICAL Input Voltage:120-277V or 347-480V Input Frequency:50/60Hz Power Factor: ≥ 90% at rated watts Total Harmonic Distortion: ≤ 20% at rated watts Lumens:2,000 - 10,000 Distribution:Type II ,III, IV and Type II Narrow, and Type II Enhanced Backlight Efficacy:110-143 LPW CCT:2700K, 3000K, 4000K CRI:≥70 OPTICAL SYSTEM WARRANTY 5 Year (Standard) 10 Year (Optional) CONTROLS Dimming:Standard - 0-10V Optional - DALI (Option U) Sensors:Photo Electric Sensors (PE) available LightGrid Compatible CONSTRUCTION Housing:Aluminum die cast enclosure casting integral heat sink for maximum heat transfer Lens:Impact resistant tempered glass Paint: Corrosion resistant powder paint, ≥ 2.0 mil thickness (RAL & custom colors available) Standard = Black, Dark Bronze, Gray, White Optional = Coastal Finish Weight: 12.4 lbs (5.6kgs) LUMEN MAINTENANCE Projected Lxx per IES TM-21-11 at 25°C Lumen Codes Distributions LXX(10K) @ Hours 25,000 HR 50,000 HR 60,000 HR 02,03,04, 05,06 A3,B3,C3, D3,E3 L96 L95 L94 07,08,09 A3,B3,C3, D3,E3 L95 L91 L89 10 A3,B3,C3, D3,E3 L89 L80 L76 Note: Projected Lxx based on LM80 (≥ 10,000 hour testing). Accepted Industry tolerances apply to initial luminous flux and lumen maintenance measurements. Operating Temperature:-40°C to 50°C Vibration: 3G per ANSI C136.31-2018 LM-79:Testing in accordance with IES Standards RATINGS SURGE PROTECTION* *Per ANSI C136.2-2018 Standard Optional 10kV/5kA Secondary 10kV/5kA (R Option) or Secondary 20kV/10kA (T Option) Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. Project Name Date Type Notes Catalog Logic Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL1 ) PROD. ID VOLTAGE LUMENS DISTRIBUTION3 CCT CONTROLS PER ANSI C136.41 COLOR OPTIONS E = Evolve 0 = 120-2771 022 A3 = Type II Narrow 27 = 2700K4 A = 7-Pin Receptacle BLCK = Black A = 4 Bolt Slipfitter6 R = Roadway H = 347-4801 03 B3 = Type II Wide 30 = 3000K4 D = 7-Pin Receptacle with Shorting Cap DKBZ = Dark Bronze B = Tether L = Local 04 C3 = Type III 40 = 4000K E = 7 Pin Receptacle with Long Life non-Dimming PE Control5 GRAY = Gray F = Fusing 1 = Single Module 1 = 120 05 D3 = Type IV WHTE= White G = Internal Bubble Level 2 = 208 06 E3 = Type II Enhanced Back Light Note: 0-10V control standard unless DALI Option "U" requested I = Optional IP66 Optical 3 = 240 07 L = Tool-Less Entry 4 = 277 08 R = Secondary 10kV/5kA SPD D = 347 09 T = Secondary 20kV/10kA SPD 5 = 480 10 U = DALI Programmable7,8 V1 = Field Adjustable Module11 X = Single Pack9 Y = Coastal Finish10 XXX = Special Options E R L 1_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 Not Available with Fusing 2 02 lumen level voltage options 1, 2, 3, and 8 only 3 Nominal IES Type classing subject to typical variation, individual units may differ 4 Select 2700K or 3000K CCT for IDA approved units 5 PE Control Only available for 120-277V or Discrete 347V or 480V. Not available for 347-480V. 6 Lead time varies, Contact Factory 7 Compatible with LightGrid 8 Not available in 347V, 480V or 347-480V for Lumen Output Levels 07-10 9 Option provides single pack box per fixture. Standard packaging = 23 units per MagnaPak Container 10 Recommended for installations within 750 feet from coast. Lead time varies, check with factory. 11 Not available with DALI "U" option SUGGESTED HID REPLACEMENT Previous Optical Pattern Latest New Optical Pattern A1, B1 Extra Narrow/Narrow Asymmetric A3 Type II Narrow C1, E1 Asymmetric Short/Medium B3 Type II Wide D1, G1 Asymmetric Forward/Extra Wide C3 Type III F1 Asymmetric Wide D3 Type IV N/A N/A E3 Type II Enhanced Back Light The information above is designed to provide a guideline to select the correct luminaire for a roadway application. The best and most accurate way to ensure the proper design is by doing a lighting layout. • 4,000 - 5,000 lumens to replace 100W HPS Cobra-head • 7,000 - 8,000 lumens to replace 150W HPS Cobra-head • 8,500 - 11,500 lumens to replace 100W HPS Cobra-head Note: actual replacement lumens may vary based upon mounting height, pole spacing, design criteria, etc. Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. Project Name Date Type Notes Spec Tables Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL1 ) LUMENOUTPUT DIST. LUMENS WATTAGE BUG RATINGS 4000K 3000K 2700K 277V 480V 4000K 3000K 2700K 02 A3 2000 1900 1900 14 N/A B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 D3 B0-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 E3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 03 A3 3000 2900 2800 22 26 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 D3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 E3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 04 A3 4000 3900 3800 31 34 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 D3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 E3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 05 A3 5000 4900 4700 39 43 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 C3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 D3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 E3 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 06 A3 6000 5800 5700 47 52 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 C3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 D3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 E3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 07 A3 7000 6800 6600 58 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 C3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 D3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 E3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 08 A3 8000 7800 7600 71 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 C3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 D3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 E3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 09 A3 9000 8800 8500 84 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 C3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 D3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 E3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 10 A3 9800 9600 9250 97 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 C3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 D3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 E3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 For additional information on ERL1 IES files, please click one of the following links: Non-Shielded Shielded Project Name Date Type Notes ERL1 Type II Narrow 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERL1_05A340___.IES ERL1 Type II Wide 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERL1_05B340___.IES ERL1 Type III 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERL1_05C340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 80° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 67° • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 75° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 69° ERL1 Type IV 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERL1_05D340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 55° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 64° • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 75° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 70° ERL1 Type II Enhanced Back Light 5,000 Lumens 4000K ERL1_05E340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 75° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 67° .1 .2 .5 1137 2275 3412 4550 1 2 .1 .2 .5 889 1778 2667 3555 1 2 .1 .2 .5 890 1780 2670 3559 1 2 .1.2.5 695 1390 2085 2781 1 2 .1 .2 .5 854 1708 2562 3416 1 2 Photometric Plots Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL1 ) Project Name Date Type Notes MOUNTING • Adjustable for 1.25 to 2 in. nominal mounting pipe • Integral diecast mounting pipe stop • Slipfitter with +/- 5 degrees of leveling adjustment NETWORKED LIGHTING CONTROL Current's LightGrid TM Outdoor Lighting Control System is designed for Street and Roadway Applications. It enables remote monitoring, control, and asset management of a single fixture or a group of fixtures through a web enabled Central Management System. EFFECTIVE PROJECTED AREA • 0.5 sq ft max (0.046 sq m) WEIGHT • 12.4 lbs (5.6 kgs) ACCESSORIES Mounting & Accessories Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL1 ) SAP Number Part Number Description 93029237 PED-MV-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 120-277V 93029238 PED-347-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 347V 93029239 PED-480-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 480V 28299 PEC0TL Standard 120-277V XXXXXX PECHTL Standard 347-480V 73251 SCCL-PECTL Shorting Cap See pages 22 & 23 for more detailed information on ERL1 Shields. Project Name Date Type Notes The Evolve® LED Roadway ERLH Luminaire is optimized utilizing advanced LED reflective optical system for local, collector and major roadways. The modern design incorporates the heat sink directly into the unit for heat transfer to prolong LED life. Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLH ) ELECTRICAL Input Voltage:120-277V or 347-480V Input Frequency:50/60Hz Power Factor: ≥ 90% at rated watts Total Harmonic Distortion: ≤ 20% at rated watts Lumens:10,000-16,000 Distribution:Type II Narrow, Type II Wide, Type III, Type IV and Type II Enhanced Back Light Efficacy:110-143 LPW CCT:2700K, 3000K, 4000K CRI:≥70 OPTICAL SYSTEM WARRANTY 5 Year (Standard) 10 Year (Optional) CONSTRUCTION Housing:Aluminum die cast enclosure casting integral heat sink for maximum heat transfer Lens:Impact resistant tempered glass Paint: Corrosion resistant powder paint, ≥ 2.0 mil thickness (RAL & custom colors available) Standard = Black, Dark Bronze, Gray, White Optional = Coastal Finish Weight: 15.15 lbs (6.9 kgs) w/ 2 Bolt Slipfitter 15.85 lbs (7.2 kgs) w/ 4 Bolt Slipfitter LUMEN MAINTENANCE Projected Lxx per IES TM-21-11 at 25°C Lumen Codes Distributions LXX(10K) @ Hours 25,000 HR 50,000 HR 60,000 HR A3, B3, C3, D3, E3 10,11 L97 L96 L96 A3, B3, C3, D3, E3 13,14 L95 L93 L92 A3, B3, C3, D3, E3 15,16 L94 L91 L91 Note: Projected Lxx based on LM80 (≥ 10,000 hour testing). Accepted Industry tolerances apply to initial luminous flux and lumen maintenance measurements. Operating Temperature: ERLH Lumen outputs 10-11, 13 (-40°C to 50°C) ERLH Lumen outputs 14-16 (-40°C to 45°C) Vibration: 3G per ANSI C136.31-2018 LM-79:Testing in accordance with IES Standards RATINGS SURGE PROTECTION* *Per ANSI C136.2-2018 *Per ANSI C136.2-2018 Standard Optional 10kV/5kA Secondary 10kV/5kA (R Option) or Secondary 20kV/10kA (T Option) CONTROLS Dimming:Standard - 0-10V Optional - DALI (Option U) Sensors:Photo Electric Sensors (PE) available LightGrid Compatible Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. Project Name Date Type Notes Catalog Logic Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLH ) SUGGESTED HID REPLACEMENT • Approximately 8,500 -11,500 lumens to replace 200W HPS Cobra-head • Approximately 11,500 -14,000 lumens to replace 250W HPS Cobra-head Note: actual replacement lumens may vary based upon mounting height, pole spacing, design criteria, etc. Previous Optical Pattern Latest New Optical Pattern A1, B1 Extra Narrow/Narrow Asymmetric A3 Type II Narrow C1, E1 Asymmetric Short/Medium B3 Type II Wide D1, G1 Asymmetric Forward/Extra Wide C3 Type III F1 Asymmetric Wide D3 Type IV N/A N/A E3 Type II Enhanced Back Light The information above is designed to provide a guideline to select the correct luminaire for a roadway application. The best and most accurate way to ensure the proper design is by doing a lighting layout. Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. PROD. ID VOLTAGE LUMENS DISTRIBUTION CCT CONTROLS PER ANSI C136.41 COLOR OPTIONS E = Evolve 0 = 120-2771 10 A3 = Type II Narrow 27 = 2700K3 A = 7-Pin Receptacle BLCK = Black A = 4 Bolt Slipfitter5 R = Roadway H = 347-4801 11 B3 = Type II Wide 30 = 3000K3 D = 7-Pin Receptacle with Shorting Cap DKBZ = Dark Bronze B = Tether L = Local 13 C3 = Type III 40 = 4000K E = 7 Pin Receptacle with Long Life non-Dimming PE Control5 GRAY = Gray F = Fusing H = High Output 1 = 120 14 D3 = Type IV WHTE= White G = Internal Bubble Level 2 = 208 15 E3 = Type II Enhanced Back Light Note: 0-10V control standard unless DALI Option "U" requested I = Optional IP66 Optical 3 = 240 16 L = Tool-Less Entry 4 = 277 R = Secondary 10kV/5kA SPD 5 = 480 T = Secondary 20kV/10kA SPD D = 347 U = DALI Programmable6,7 V1 = Field Adjustable Module10 X = Single Pack8 Y = Coastal Finish9 XXX = Special Options E R L H_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ 1 Not Available with Fusing 2 Nominal IES Type classing subject to typical variation, individual units may differ 3 Select 2700K or 3000K CCT for IDA approved units 4 PE Control Only available for 120-277V or Discrete 347V or 480V. Not available for 347-480V. 5 Lead time varies, Contact Factory 6 Compatible with LightGrid 7 Not available in 347V, 480V or 347-480V for Lumen Output Levels 07-10 8 Option provides single pack box per fixture. Standard packaging = 23 units per MagnaPak Container 9 Recommended for installations within 750 feet from coast. Lead time varies, check with factory. 10 Not available with DALI "U" option Project Name Date Type Notes Spec Tables Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLH ) LUMEN OUTPUT DISTRIBUTION LUMENS WATTAGE BUG RATINGS 4000K 3000K 2700K 120-277V347-480V 4000K 3000K 2700K 10 A3 10000 9600 9300 82 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 C3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 D3 B1-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 11 A3 11500 11000 10700 98 B3-U0-G3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B3 B3-U0-G3 B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 C3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B1-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B1-U0-G2 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 13 A3 13000 12500 12100 111 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 C3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B1-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 14 A3 14000 13400 13000 122 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 C3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 15 A3 15000 14400 13900 136 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 C3 B2-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 16 A3 16000 15300 14900 149 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 C3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 For additional information on ERLH IES files, please click one of the following links: Non-Shielded Shielded Project Name Date Type Notes Photometric Plots Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLH ) ERLH Type II Narrow 13,000 Lumens 4000K ERLH_13A340___.IES ERLH Type II Wide 13,000 Lumens 4000K ERLH_13B340___.IES ERLH Type III 13,000 Lumens 4000K ERLH_13C340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle ERLH Type IV 13,000 Lumens 4000K ERLH_13D340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle ERLH Type II Enhanced Back Light 13,000 Lumens 4000K ERLH_13E340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle .1 .2 .5 3467 6934 10400 13867 1 2 .1.2 .5 2670 5341 8011 1 2 .1 .2 .5 2405 4810 1 .1.2 .5 1795 3591 5386 7182 1 2 .1 .2 .5 2630 5260 7890 1 2 Project Name Date Type Notes Mounting & Accessories Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERLH ) MOUNTING • Adjustable for 1.25 to 2 in. nominal mounting pipe • Integral diecast mounting pipe stop • Slipfitter with +/- 5 degrees of leveling adjustment NETWORKED LIGHTING CONTROL Current's LightGrid TM Outdoor Lighting Control System is designed for Street and Roadway Applications. It enables remote monitoring, control, and asset management of a single fixture or a group of fixtures through a web enabled Central Management System. EFFECTIVE PROJECTED AREA • 0.5 sq ft max (0.046 sq m) WEIGHT • 15.15 lbs (6.9 kgs) w/ 2 Bolt Slipfitter • 15.85 lbs (7.2 kgs) w/ 4 Bolt Slipfitter ACCESSORIES SAP Number Part Number Description 93029237 PED-MV-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 120-277V 93029238 PED-347-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 347V 93029239 PED-480-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 480V 28299 PEC0TL Standard 120-277V XXXXXX PECHTL Standard 347-480V 73251 SCCL-PECTL Shorting Cap See pages 22 & 23 for more detailed information on ERLH Shields. Project Name Date Type Notes The Evolve® LED Roadway ERL2 Luminaire is optimized utilizing advanced LED reflective optical system for local, collector and major roadways. The modern design incorporates the heat sink directly into the unit for heat transfer to prolong LED life. Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL2 ) ELECTRICAL Input Voltage:120-277V or 347-480V Input Frequency:50/60Hz Power Factor: ≥ 90% at rated watts Total Harmonic Distortion: ≤ 20% at rated watts Lumens:16,000 - 30,000 Distribution:Type II Narrow, II/III, III, V Efficacy:110-143 LPW CCT:2700K, 3000K, 4000K CRI:≥ 70 OPTICAL SYSTEM WARRANTY 5 Year (Standard) 10 Year (Optional) CONTROLS Dimming:Standard - 0-10V Optional - DALI (Option U) Sensors:Photo Electric Sensors (PE) available LightGrid Compatible CONSTRUCTION Housing:Aluminum die cast enclosure casting integral heat sink for maximum heat transfer Lens:Impact resistant tempered glass Paint: Corrosion resistant polyester powder paint, minimum ≥ 2.0 mil thickness (RAL & custom colors available) Standard = Black, Dark Bronze, Gray, White Optional = Coastal Finish Weight:24.0 lbs (10.9 kgs) LUMEN MAINTENANCE Projected Lxx per IES TM-21-11 at 25°C Lumen Codes Distributions LXX(10K) @ Hours 25,000 HR 50,000 HR 60,000 HR 16, 18, 19, 21, 23 A3,B3,C3, D3,E3 L96 L94 L94 25, 27, 28 A3,B3,C3, D3,E3 L95 L93 L92 30 A3,B3,C3, D3,E3 L94 L91 L90 Note: Projected Lxx based on LM80 (≥ 10,000 hour testing). Accepted Industry tolerances apply to initial luminous flux and lumen maintenance measurements. Operating Temperature: Lumen Output 16-28 (-40°C to 50°C) Lumen Output 30 (-40°C to 45°C) Vibration: 3G per ANSI C136.31-2018 LM-79:Testing in accordance with IES Standards RATINGS SURGE PROTECTION* *Per ANSI C136.2-2018 Standard Optional 10kV/5kA Secondary 10kV/5kA (R Option) or Secondary 20kV/10kA (T Option) Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. Project Name Date Type Notes Catalog Logic Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL2 ) SUGGESTED HID REPLACEMENT • Approximately 21,000 - 30,000 lumens lumens to replace 400W HPS Cobra-head Note: actual replacement lumens may vary based upon mounting height, pole spacing, design criteria, etc. Previous Optical Pattern Latest New Optical Pattern A1, B1 Extra Narrow/Narrow Asymmetric A3 Type II Narrow C1, E1 Asymmetric Short/Medium B3 Type II Wide D1, G1 Asymmetric Forward/Extra Wide C3 Type III F1 Asymmetric Wide D3 Type IV N/A N/A E3 Type II Enhanced Back Light The information above is designed to provide a guideline to select the correct luminaire for a roadway application. The best and most accurate way to ensure the proper design is by doing a lighting layout. Not all product variations listed on this page are DLC qualified. Visit www.designlights.org/search to confirm qualifications. PROD. ID VOLTAGE LUMENS DISTRIBUTION CCT CONTROLS PER ANSI C136.41 COLOR OPTIONS E = Evolve 0 = 120-2771 16 A3 = Type II Narrow2 27 = 2700K3 A = 7-Pin Receptacle BLCK = Black A = 4 Bolt Slipfitter5 R = Roadway H = 347-4801 18 B3 = Type II Wide 30 = 3000K3 D = 7-Pin Receptacle with Shorting Cap DKBZ = Dark Bronze B = Tether L = Local 19 C3 = Type III 40 = 4000K E = 7 Pin Receptacle with Long Life non-Dimming PE Control4 GRAY = Gray F = Fusing 2 = Double Module 1 = 120 21 D3 = Type IV WHTE= White G = Internal Bubble Level 2 = 208 23 E3 = Type II Enhanced Back Light Note: 0-10V control standard unless DALI Option "U" requested I = Optional IP66 Optical 3 = 240 25 L = Tool-Less Entry 4 = 277 27 M1 = MagnaPak9 5 = 480 28 R = Secondary 10kV/5kA SPD D = 347 30 T = Secondary 20kV/10kA SPD U = DALI Programmable6 V1 = Field Adjustable Module8 Y = Coastal Finish7 XXX = Special Options E R L 2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ 1 Not Available with Fusing 2 Nominal IES Type classing subject to typical variation, individual units may differ 3 Select 2700K or 3000K CCT for IDA approved units 4 PE Control Only available for 120-277V or Discrete 347V or 480V. Not available for 347-480V. 5 Lead time varies, Contact Factory 6 Compatible with LightGrid 7 Recommended for installations within 750 feet from coast. Lead time varies, check with factory. 8 Not available with DALI "U" option 9 Option M1 provides for MagnaPak – 20 Fixtures per MagnaPak Container. Single Pack box is standard Project Name Date Type Notes Spec Tables Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL2 ) LUMENOUTPUT DIST. LUMENS WATTAGE BUG RATINGS 4000K 3000K 2700K 277V 480V 4000K 3000K 2700K 16 A3 16000 15300 14900 120 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 C3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 18 A3 18000 17300 16700 140 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 C3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 19 A3 19000 18200 17700 149 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 C3 B3-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 21 A3 21000 20100 19500 174 177 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 C3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 D3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 23 A3 23000 22100 21400 194 196 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 C3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 D3 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G3 E3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 25 A3 25000 24000 23300 214 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 C3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 D3 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 E3 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 27 A3 27000 25900 25100 237 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G3 C3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 D3 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 E3 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 28 A3 28000 26900 26100 251 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 C3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 D3 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 E3 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 30 A3 30000 28800 27900 278 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 B3-U0-G3 B3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 C3 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 B3-U0-G4 D3 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 B2-U0-G4 E3 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 B4-U0-G4 For additional information on ERL2 IES files, please click one of the following links: Non-Shielded Shielded Project Name Date Type Notes Photometric Plots Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL2 ) ERL2 Type II Narrow 23,000 Lumens 4000K ERL2_23A340___.IES ERL2 Type II Wide 23,000 Lumens 4000K ERL2_23B340___.IES ERL2 Type III 23,000 Lumens 4000K ERL2_23C340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 80° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 69° • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 75° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 72° ERL2 Type IV 23,000 Lumens 4000K ERL2_23D340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 55° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 65° • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 75° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 71° ERL2 Type IV 23,000 Lumens 4000K ERL2_23E340___.IES • Mounting Height at 30’ • Initial Footcandle at Grade — Vertical plane at max Cd horiz. angle 75° — Horizontal cone at max Cd vert. angle 69° .1 .2 .5 6134 12267 18401 24534 1 2 .1 .2 .5 4725 9449 14174 18899 1 2 .1 .2 .5 4255 8510 12765 17020 1 2 .1.2 .5 3177 6353 9530 12706 1 2 .1 .2 .5 4653 9306 13959 18612 1 2 Project Name Date Type Notes Mounting & Accessories Evolve® LED Roadway Lighting Cobra Head (ERL2 ) MOUNTING • Adjustable for 1.25 to 2 in. nominal mounting pipe • Integral diecast mounting pipe stop • Slipfitter with +/- 5 degrees of leveling adjustment NETWORKED LIGHTING CONTROL Current's LightGrid TM Outdoor Lighting Control System is designed for Street and Roadway Applications. It enables remote monitoring, control, and asset management of a single fixture or a group of fixtures through a web enabled Central Management System. EFFECTIVE PROJECTED AREA • 0.57 sq ft max (0.053 sq m) WEIGHT: • 24.0 lbs (10.9 kgs) ACCESSORIES SAP Number Part Number Description 93029237 PED-MV-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 120-277V 93029238 PED-347-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 347V 93029239 PED-480-LED-7 ANSI C136.41 Dimming PE, 480V 28299 PEC0TL Standard 120-277V XXXXXX PECHTL Standard 347-480V 73251 SCCL-PECTL Shorting Cap See pages 22 & 23 for more detailed information on ERL2 Shields. Project Name Date Type Notes Evolve® LED Cobra Head Shield Guide ERLC SHIELDS Product Code:93110037 Description:ELSHS-ERLC-BLCK Product Code:93110038 Description:ELSHS-ERLC-GRAY ERL1 / ERLH SHIELDS Product Code:93024487 Description:ELSHS-ERL1-BLCK Product Code:93046386 Description:ELSHS-ERL1-GRAY Product Code:93068998 Description:ELSHS-ERL1-DKBZ ERL2 SHIELDS Product Code:93070722 Description:ELSHS-ERL2-BLCK Product Code:93085564 Description:ELSHS-ERL2-GRAY Product Code:93096747 Description:ELSHS-ERL2-DKBZ ERLC SHIELDS Product Code:93132372 Description:ELSFS-ERLC-BLCK-10 Product Code:93132373 Description:ELSFS-ERLC-BLCK-15 Product Code:93134760 Description:ELSFS-ERLC-BLCK-20 ERL1 / ERLH SHIELDS Product Code:93092595 Description:ELSFS-ERL1-BLCK-10 Product Code:93108740 Description:ELSFS-ERL1-GRAY-10 Product Code:93092906 Description:ELSFS-ERL1-BLCK-15 Product Code:93105144 Description:ELSFS-ERL1-GRAY-15 Product Code:93088130 Description:ELSFS-ERL1-BLCK-20 Product Code:93088131 Description:ELSFS-ERL1-GRAY-20 ERL2 SHIELDS Product Code:93132955 Description:ELSFS-ERL2-BLCK-20 Product Code:93132986 Description:ELSFS-ERL2-GRAY-20 HOUSE SIDE SHIELDS STREET SIDE SHIELDS www.gecurrent.com © 2021 Current Lighting Solutions, LLC. All rights reserved. GE and the GE monogram are trademarks of the General Electric Company and are used under license. Information provided is subject to change without notice. All values are design or typical values when measured under laboratory conditions. OLP3128 (Rev 08/23/21) Project Name Date Type Notes Evolve® LED Cobra Head Shield Guide FOOTNOTES: 1) 10 = 1" Shield Depth; 15 = 1.5" Shield Depth; 20 = 2" Shield Depth 2) Black is recommended to reduce potential for glare coming off of the shield 3) Use "House Side" Shield to block light trespass behind the pole 4) Use "Street Side" / Front Shield to block light light trespass across the street ERLC SHIELDS Product Code:93132374 Description: ELS-ERLC- LEFTRIGHTSIDEKIT- BLCK-10 SIDE SHIELDS (L&R) ERL1 / ERLH SHIELDS Product Code:93118695 Description: ELS-ERL1H- LEFTRIGHTSIDEKIT- BLCK-10 ERL2 SHIELDS Product Code:93132989 Description: ELS-ERL2- LEFTRIGHTSIDEKIT- BLCK-10 Shipped as a kit - L & R can be used independently N E S W Canyonlands Healthcare Special Service District Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District Canyonlands Healthcare Special Service District supports the following services when funding is available: Long Term Care –Primary Funding Focus –Sales Tax Hospital Care –Disproportional Share Hospital (DSH) Outpatient Medical Care –Moab Free Clinic Emergency Services –Share Sales Tax Revenue Where there is love, there is life. Canyonlands Care Center: 36 Bed Long Term Care Facility Residents remain in their community or move to be near family Currently at full capacity with a waiting list Two rooms are held for Infection Control Quality of Care is rated as a 5 star facility Reimbursement through private pay and Medicaid Current reimbursement is 65% Medicaid 35% Private Pay Private Pay Reimbursement is approx. $7500/month or $250/day Medicaid Reimbursement is approx. $6000/month or $200/day In process of applying for Medicare Skilled Care License Allows for reimbursement from Medicare reimbursed services up to $750/day Canyonlands Care Center CASE MIX Age Range: 76 –106 years old Diagnosis: Dementia –60% Stroke –30% Chronic Disease, i.e. heart, kidney –100% Musculoskeletal/Nervous System Disease –70% Diabetes Complications –25% Functional Limitations with Activities of Daily Living–100% Walking, Transfers, Eating, Dressing, Grooming, Bathing Impacts of Covid19 •One of three Long Term Care and Assisted Living Facilities out of over 400 in Utah that did not have a resident contract Covid19 •Staffing was a challenge •Exposure 14 day paid leave Quarantines and Resignations •Residents unable to visit with loved ones for over 10 months •Including all of the holidays, birthdays or special family events •Staff became family for over 8 months •No volunteer support •Resident unable to leave the facility •Increase in depression and loneliness without family and friends What’s New •Medicare Skilled Care Facility allow to receive Medicare Reimbursement •Physical Therapy •Skilled Nursing Care •Eliminate need for Acute Inpatient Skilled Care •Conduct In house CNA certification •Train and certify Nursing Assistance •Ability to keep staff and promote from within •Implement a robust outreach system •Social Media/Website •Inform the Community of Care Center activities and events •Moab Health Care Foundation •Strategizing Funding Raising Options •Assist with Health Care Grants/Donations –Private and Foundation Support When I grow old I shall wear purple! Budget 2020-2022 2020 Budget: $1,900,000 -Actual $1,400,000 Care Center Subsidy -$1,200,000 Hospital DSH Payment -$246,000 Does not include Debt Service payment to CIB -$400,000/year –deferred to 2022 2021 Budget: $1,400,000 -YTD $1,200,000 Care Center Subsidy -$1,400,000 Debit Service -$0 Hospital DSH Payment -$0 2022 Budget: $1,800,000 Care Center Subsidy -$1,400,000 Debit Service -$400,000 Hospital DSH Payment -$0 QUESTIONS? THANK YOU! Page 1 of 3 September 14, 2021 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES--DRAFT REGULAR MEETING September 14, 2021 The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date. An audio recording of the meeting is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html and a video recording is archived at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paDDBZF6kAE. Regular City Council Meeting: Mayor Emily Niehaus called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. Councilmembers Karen Guzman- Newton, Tawny Knuteson-Boyd, Mike Duncan, Rani Derasary and Kalen Jones attended. City staff participating included Acting City Manager Carly Castle, Sustainability Director Mila Dunbar-Irwin, Senior Project Manager Kaitlin Myers, Engineer Chuck Williams, Public Works Director Levi Jones, Finance Director Ben Billingsley, Parks, Recreation and Trails Director Annie McVay, Planner Nora Shepard, Communication Director Lisa Church and Recorder Sommar Johnson. Six persons were in the audience. Mayor Niehaus led the Pledge of Allegiance. There were no Citizens to be Heard. Administrative Reports: Acting City Manager Castle reported on the state of the organization since the departure of City Manager Joel Linares and City Attorney Laurie Simonson. She stated there would be no impact on the City’s essential services and ongoing projects. She commended Council for developing a good team of department managers. Castle updated Council on three projects proposed for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding. She announced the outdoor pool would close September 19. She mentioned the need for more publicity of the new noise ordinances with the recent influx of off-highway vehicle traffic. She mentioned the upcoming transfer of Hotspot funding from the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for local transit and dispersed parking. Councilmember Derasary asked about committees and meetings covered by Linares. Sustainability Director Dunbar-Irwin updated Council on sustainability initiatives, including an upcoming Water Conservation Plan Update public hearing, Streetlamp conversions, the draft Sustainability Action Plan, Utah Climate Week, City solar arrays, building code amendments, a proposed Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA) position, a landscape ordinance and an electric vehicle letter of support. Mayor and Council Reports: Mayor Niehaus spoke about the City Manager’s departure. She thanked him for his service and praised Castle for stepping up. She said the City’s department heads constitute an awesome team. She noted the Matheson Wetlands ARPA project. She reported on meetings of the Utah Water Quality Board, the proposed timed-entry system at Arches National Park, and a meeting with Senator Mike Lee. She said she would be presenting at the upcoming Utah League of Cities and Towns (ULCT) conference. She also attended a meeting of the Utah Cultural Alliance at the Moab Museum, the September 11 commemoration at Swanny Park, the Rural Coordination Council Tribal Working Group, and noted an upcoming meeting regarding redistricting. Councilmember Duncan reported on a ride-along with a law enforcement officer. Councilmember Derasary reported she attended the August 25 ULCT meeting and also participated in a ride-along with law enforcement and noted she highly recommends it. She reported on her participation on a panel reviewing visioning consultants and mentioned the September 11 commemoration event. She thanked the Interfaith Coalition for hosting the event Page 2 of 3 September 14, 2021 and thanked the Public Works department for their front-line service. She said she attended the Red Sands Pow Wow and reminded residents to call law enforcement if they hear discharge of firearms in their neighborhoods. She brought up citizen allegations of staff bullying, retaliation and lack of accountability, among other claims. She called for a meeting to discuss the issues and stated she did not intend to deride staff but rather viewed the matter as something in need of improvement. She indicated the City’s standards might not be high enough. She also brought up that she was not informed of the City Manager’s departure until hours before he left and noted that, by law, the Mayor’s conducts day-to-day oversight of the City Manager. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd spoke about a National Parks Conservation Association local assessment regarding tourism, workforce housing and issues with law enforcement. She said she was interviewed for National Parks magazine. She said Canyonlands Care Center had still not experienced a single positive case of COVID-19 among the residents. She said the Care Center’s Special Service District meeting focused on budget and financials. She thanked former City Manager Linares for his service and praised Acting Manager Castle and the staff. Councilmember Guzman-Newton reported on the Chamber of Commerce board meeting and noted the tepid local reception for the Rocky Mountaineer luxury train. She said she attended a meeting regarding timed entry at Arches National Park and announced the Chamber’s annual dinner. She said she was participating in a series of webinars on federal highway safety initiatives. She reported on the Airport Board meeting at which lease agreements were discussed and noted the number of enplanements is ahead of 2019. Guzman-Newton stated she was not informed about the former City Manager’s resignation. She asked if it was acceptable that the Human Resources (HR) Director did not inform the City’s leadership. Acting Manager Castle stated it was protected HR communication. Guzman-Newton concluded by stating there was apparent dysfunction on the Council. Councilmember Jones reported on the Travel Council and announced Howard Trenholme had resigned and Jason Taylor was the incoming chair. Jones said budgetary concerns were discussed and a funding request for visitation data analysis was tabled. He reported that Arches National Park had closed every other day due to overcrowding. He said that hotel occupancy had fallen in July and the Labor Day visitation to Moab was lower than expected. Jones reported on a meeting of the renewable energy group, noted Moab City is on the communications committee, and implored Communications Director Church to participate. Jones reported he attended meetings of the housing task force and the Colorado Association of Ski Towns, at which workforce housing was discussed. He mentioned that several bills were passed in Colorado to curb greenhouse gases. He concluded with a mention of a recent County meeting to discuss rebuilding Kane Creek Boulevard between 500 West and the BLM border. Approval of Minutes: Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve the minutes for the August 24, 2021 Regular Meeting. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Derasary, Jones, Guzman-Newton, Knuteson-Boyd, and Duncan voting aye. Presentation—School District: Grand County School District Community Coordinator Amanda Knill spoke about the school’s 30-day mask mandate to combat COVID-19. She mentioned the new middle school principal and a community-wide initiative to encourage students to stay in school. She brought up upcoming family and community engagement nights and school-sponsored YouTube channels. Mayor Niehaus requested that the high school internship program at City Hall be reinstated. Page 3 of 3 September 14, 2021 Old Business: Walnut Lane Phase I Bid Preparation—Approved Presentation and Discussion: Public Works Director Jones detailed maintenance operations at the exiting Walnut Lane site. Council was invited to tour the site. Senior Project Manager Myers briefed Council on the timeline for new units since Indie Dwell failed to cure issues with the contract. Finance Director Billingsley provided budgetary updates and discussed bond issue costs and options including reissuance of the bonds. Councilmember Derasary brought up the assistance provided by ULCT staff to assist with ARPA funds for Walnut Lane. Myers and City Engineer Williams discussed and fielded questions regarding options including Design-Build or Design-Bid-Build procedures to move forward. Councilmembers Jones and Guzman-Newton asked about potential changes to the scope of the project and Councilmember Duncan asked for a pro-forma for modular units. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Duncan moved to pursue a Design-Bid-Build package for completion of Phase I of the Walnut Lane project. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Duncan and Guzman-Newton voting aye. 2021 Class C Roads Map—Approved Presentation and Discussion: Engineer Williams briefly presented the Class C Roads update, which concerns funding from the State of Utah for maintenance of city roadways, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to adopt the 2021 Class C Road Map dated September 8, 2021. Councilmember Guzman-Newton seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Duncan and Guzman- Newton voting aye. Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab: Motion and vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve the bills against the City of Moab in the amount of $197,599.91. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Jones, Duncan, Guzman-Newton, Derasary, and Knuteson- Boyd voting aye. Executive (Closed) Session: Motions and Votes: Councilmember Jones moved to enter an Executive (Closed) Session to Discuss Reasonably Imminent and/or Pending Litigation and to Discuss the Character, Professional Competence, or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual or Individuals. Councilmember Guzman-Newton seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Duncan and Guzman-Newton voting aye. Mayor Niehaus convened the Executive Session at 9:30 p.m. Councilmember Duncan moved to end the Executive Session. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Duncan and Guzman- Newton voting aye. Mayor Niehaus ended the Executive Session at 10:38 p.m. Adjournment: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously and Mayor Niehaus adjourned the meeting at 10:39 p.m. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Title: Special Event Permit Application for Grand County Family Support Center’s Trunk-or-Treat Staff Presenter: Kelley Mclnerney Attachments: Special Event Application Rules and Reliability Release Form Entry Form Event Information Location: Swanny Park Dates: Saturday, October 30th Times: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (set up starts at 10 a.m. and clean up ends at 6 p.m.) Expected Attendance: ~50 Vehicles, ~2-3,000 participants Applicant: Grand County Family Support Center Options: Motion to approve, deny, or modify Recommended Motion: “I move to approve a Special Event License for the 2021 Trunk-or-Treat event to be held in the City of Moab at Swanny Park” Background/Summary: Event description: This is a community, family friendly, Halloween themed, free event. This event offers a safe, public place for children to participate in Halloween activities. Pre-registered vehicles and community members set up decorated vehicles and stations to distribute candy. Costumes are showcased, Halloween themed décor is displayed, and a haunted house is set up. They are requesting to have West Park Drive closed (neighborhood traffic will still have access via Park Ave) for Firetrucks and Emergency vehicles as an interactive learning experience for the children attending the event. In past years it has been held at the Old Spanish Trail Arena. This year they wanted to be in town, participants are encouraged to walk, and it will be held during the daylight hours. We have had a meeting with the organizers to discuss the importance of certain elements of their event, including parking, restrooms, and traffic management. The organizers are willing to put a limit on the number of cars registered if desired, in past years it has been about 40-60 cars that participate. They will have volunteers to help with crowd management and traffic. We are recommending that they arrange for extra parking to be available at the HMK Elementary and/or Church lots across 400 N. APPROVALS: City:.,::.:..;=..:;:.. __ ___,,,_ Oate:===-=--- SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Flre:._ ......... ........__.Date :;...,...,.,...,,....--,,.- CITY OF MOAB Conditions of approval: City of Moab Special Events 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 Phone: 435-259-5121 E-mail: cvcnts@moabcity.org Other Staff Approval: ___________ _ Date._---,-__ __,;;;;,=- TYPE OF ACTMTY check all that apply: 0 Cycling0 Sporting D Dance 0 SK O Training Event O Festival D Film Production D Parade 0 lOK O BlockParty O Religious D Outdoors Sales D Fun Run �Other TrunK Qr Tr:en..+.Please print or type EVENT NAME : mm\ \y Su\? po V-t Ce,,"'--\--c:. r Tv-U,, 'A.\<, o ,r \ X: e .. o..,+ 1. Location of Event: S D 2.Location of Event: WO..nV\.y C..i.1r-y , a'("'K 3.Name of Organiza tion:C e,'l'..-\-e,r a± "The,,, L'2 r \s±vv-.o.:s. Box 4.Date (s) of Event:o'o \ Start Date: Start Time: 5.EVENT DETAILS Event Location 1 Date(s): Start time: End time: Set-up Date{s): Start time: O End time: Clean-up Date(s): Start time: 5 End time: Event Location 2 Date(s): Start time: End time: Set-up Date(s): Start time: End time: Clean-up Date(s): Start time: End time: Is this a recurring event? �e,.$ Is this an Annual Event? If yes; daily, weekly or other? If yes; same date and place? a h'Ol>..a \ Bouse..." .2..: Oo PYV\ -5: Oo PVV'\ 5.PARTICIPANTS ye-s \?ass.\ \ol y , "J e a� e � 'Y\ +ev-e�:t:ed . Number of participants expected: IS?J Open to the Public Number of Volunteers/Event Staff: ,..._ D Private Group/Party If event is open to the public, is it: D Entrance Feerricketedhl o Ee e. . Event? D Fee for Participants/ Racers/Runners Only 6. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant: ravv c ur --?f ct m V S ►m ? o r t C h --e ►r Address: \ g O SOLE -k Day Phone:L. .35) 5C — I 65 Cell/Other: Mailing Address (if different): Event Web Address (if applicable): Alternate Contact For Event: c�Er Cell/other: 070 Q (, - S47(, ( p E -Mail: SS o W a 1 5 E. Ce Y• -e r SA -Yee. ,-lr Cell Phone/Other: ON oak , UT E-mail: S SO W 'L� ` ra4Cou,yn't-y lk4h . he+ 7. VENDORS/FOOD/ALCOHOL check all that apply Vendors/Merchants Are Vendors Merchants Selling Products or Services? Yes No If yes, Temporary Sales Tax Numbers are required from State Special Event Tax Division 801-297-6303 Is Food available at he event I Yes Is the food (please check all that apply) Given away Catered by restaurantsNendors Prepared on site Events which have Food available must contact the SE Utah Health Dept., for approval 435-259-5602 II Alcoholic Beverages will be available at the event I I Yes U Please check applicable Beer Stands Fenced in Beer Garden Selling, Serving, Giving Away, Alcohol at an event requires City Council, and State Of Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Licensing for state approval 801-977-6800 8. TENTS/STAGES/STRUCTURES (include details on site man) tin Tents/Pop-up Canopies GI Yes ❑ No How many Tents/Pop-up Canopiesn will be used for the event? Dimensions of Tents/Pop-up Canopies: 1- 6.f\ C Rquh�e--d p us e. All Enclosed Tents and Pop-up Canopies require inspections from the Moab Valley Fire Department 435-259-5557 and maybe staked into the ground I with Parks Superintendents permission. ❑ Temporary Stage Dimensions: Description of Tents/Canopies/Staee, etc.: H aura --e- N tbUSt� 9. SITE SETUP/SOUND check all that apply (please include details on site map) t.-PA/Audio System Type/Description: vv.\ to 5't L Fireworks / Fire Performances / Open Flame N A Propane/Gas On site U A Trash/Recycle Bin coordination On Site 'd Pt 1 encinglscaffoldtng A (must obtain privately) Barricades 1J (must obtain privately) Portable Sanitary Units j} A (must obtain privately) Music if yes, check all that apply I I Acoustic 1 1, Amplified try k-dt\l hAtkI cars, t,.att.h+cA 4.nusP Requires approval from Moab Valley Fire Dept. (435) 259-5557 Requires approval from Moab Valley Fire Dept. (435) 259-5557 Monument Waste (435) 259-6314 10. ROAD : SIDEWALK USE please include details on site map © Wil ' oad & Sidewalks Be Used? ® Yes Ii No ® Are you requesting Road Closures? g] Yes ❑ No An Encroachment Permit is required for Road Closures and Sidewalk Use. To obtain the permit, please contact Moab City Public Works Dept., 435-259-7485. r U.). Par V. Thor. alovn\ Suthr‘ny (sky Park_ bov-acr. kJ Road Use and Closure Location: L Tar he r Lam be, v. U Sidewalk Use Location: ❑ -Will stay on sidewalks and IAN S l d G �� follow pedestrian laws U Parade N Location: Number of Floats: 11. Application fee is based on attendance as followed: Due at time of submittal (Other fees may apply after review by Events Committee) 0 To $466.00 for attendance under 300 $820.00 for attendance over 300 tal: $ , By submitting a signed application, the applicant certifies that falsifying any information on this application constitutes cause for rejection or revocation of the Permit. Ch rand r out( -A`y W\ Ay Su Or -1- Ce.rv1t,r g 25/21 Print Applicant's Name r Applicants Signature ate 4 EVENT DESCRIPTION PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR EVENT IN DETAIL ADD ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR PAGES • Please be sure to include any elements of your event that will help with the approval of the event. A time -line of the event would also be helpful. Pre - rest i s e r e.d comp -n(4 h 11-/ it c vn Le rs a r's--; Ve_ a' -N'( se :f r4 r y (-fl v-o+e) i,/e,k; c ks or 0 -Wier s* -J- o' -Ls -/0 oIl:rf iJ,c1 (1Ii hviV . A ha u n-I� C-6 YI 0 u.fE. Is Ce_+ U r -Fey n /ale r h / v n, u . L. Yr1 /, re_ W I V r, a r- c O U rv7l e,-ikc+s n r vh uS E G YY 1 4- V l ay e_Ot ot+ IInr)IUlcUa I e.cor'a4.cif " r�[ r1 -Tr o i0c±s. Un) u 1-1-1-cces and Ud +-l' ()Lis C0bn ►e,ul h1'Cy h ai 1-\ s a sd-Fe, Ja e� -For c h l r) ve v +) a h d -FO -f'n e< o t -r r-, U n I'/ +o ski; re_ -We r r- Cos --I- h -,e,5 a h of (ye rA+I VC. Haunt/Jeer, ---sewed /sett v --e 4j'ohs Inca) E►15, V l na \)4)Iey to par+1-nevv± ar,d Cla.t,tic Air 1(ne_fil VC. pa r-rt p oI t-e.d i h fl u r e. U[ h+. 1 DETAILED SITE MAP PLEASE INCLUDE OR ATTACH A DETAILED SITE PLAN AND/OR ROUTE MAP. COMPUTER OR HAND -DRAWN SITE PLANS ARE APPROPRIATE. Be aware that if you are faxing a map, many elements may not be visible. Your map should include: The names of streets, placement of barricades, and/or road closures The areas where participants and vendors/merchants will park Parade forming and disbanding areas, bleachers, etc. Vendor and booth placement, tables, etc. Portable Toilets, fencing Location of Security Personal, information booth, lost and found booth Stage, Tents and materials, storage, etc. used in the event. North Clow of lary.r Tar k 11 r-. Cc.losea ere\er'o, ercy Veh%cle 'iur+ner Luwwe_ri 6 • d -,c. taa,. k g Sit Cr' T,^ 3 •.I+ aSe: ACOR,fle `Co CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MMIDDrrYYY) 08!3112021 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(Ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Utah Local Governments Trust 55 S. Highway 89 North Salt Lake UT 84054-2054 CONTACT Underwriting Department I rueC. No. Ext1: FAX Na): 801-936-0300 E-MAIL SS: Underwriting@utahtrust.gov ADDRE INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC V INSURER A: Utah Local Governments Trust INSURED Grand County 125 E. Center Street Moab UT 84532 INSURER B s INSURER C: INSURER 0 ; INSURER E : INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: AI_11490_2021 06 REVISION NUMBER: THIS Is TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. tNSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADOL Viso SUER wVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF IM DIYYYYI MIG POLICY EXP IMMIDOmfYY1 LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL Y 11490 -LIABILITY 01/01/2021 12/31/2021 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,040 /LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR DAMAGE RA MISES TO occurrrrenFe) $ MED EXP (Any one person) S PERSONAL & ADV INJURY S GEN'L AGGREGATE UMIT APPLIES PER. GENERAL AGGREGATE 5 5,000,000 X POLICY ©JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGO S OTHER. Deductible S 0 A AUTOMOBILELIABIUTY ANY AUTO AUTOS ONLY HIRED AUTOS ONLY 11490 -LIABILITY 01/01/2021 12/31/2021 C OMBINEEDn1SINGLELIMIT $ 5,000,000 X BODILY INJURY !Per person) $ _ AUTOS ULED BODILY :INJURY(Per accident] $ NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY PROPERTY DAMAGE 'Per accident) $ Deductible s 0 OCCUR UMBRELLA W1B HI EXCESS UM CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE EACH OCCURRENCE 3 — S OED I RETENTION S S WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANYPROPRIETORIPARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) If yes. describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS YIN N l A PER STA ER I IOTH. E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ ❑ E L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE S below E.L DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS ! LOCATIONS) VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached II more space Is required) Confirmation of General/Automobile Liability for Grand County in regards to Trunk or Treat event at Swanny Park in Moab City held October 30, 2021. Certificate holder is named as additional insured (see endorsement). 30 day notice of cancellation will be provided should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION Moab City 217 E Center Street Moab UT 84532 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 404.,4"s„ © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ACORD 25 {2016103} ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT Named Insured Grand County Endorsement Number AI_11490 2021 _06 Policy Number 11490 -LIABILITY Endorsement Effective 08/31/2021 Countersigned by - vim (Authorized Representative) The above is required to be completed only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to the preparation of the policy. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. This Endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY Person or Organization (Additional Insured): Moab City A. With respect to Comprehensive General Liability only, the "Persons or Entities Insured" is amended to include the person or organization shown above as an Additional Insured with whom you (the Named Insured) has agreed in a written contract or written agreement that such person or organization be added as an Additional Insured to your policy. The coverage provided by this Endorsement extends only to tort liability assumed by the Additional Insured based upon the alleged actionable conduct of the Named Insured resulting in Bodily Injury, Personal Injury or Property Damage. Tort liability means liability that would be imposed by law in the absence of any contract or agreement. The status of a person's or organization's status as an Additional Insured under this Endorsement ends when this policy terminates, or when the contract or agreement between the Named Insured and the Additional Insured terminates, whichever occurs first. B. The contract or agreement referred to in Paragraph A. above must be: 1. In effect at the inception of the Policy Period or become effective during the Policy Period; and 2. Executed prior to the Bodily Injury, Personal Injury or Property Damage covered under this Endorsement. UTAH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TRUST AI -E 2016.1 Page 1 of 2 C. The coverage provided by this Endorsement to the Additional Insured does NOT apply to any Bodily Injury, Personal Injury or Property Damage arising out of the alleged actionable conduct of the Additional Insured. D. The coverage provided by this Endorsement to the Additional Insured shall be limited to the lesser of the coverage provided under the Comprehensive General Liability coverage and the coverage required under the written contract or written agreement between the Named Insured and the Additional Insured. E. The Additional Insured is subject to all of the terms, provisions, conditions, exclusions, definitions and limitations applicable to the Named Insured. The failure of the Named Insured to adhere to any such provisions will defeat coverage under the policy for the Additional Insured. F. The coverage provided by this Endorsement to the Additional Insured shall not be deemed a waiver of any statutory immunity, protection or limitation of liability, and the Trust does not waive its right to deny coverage by reasons of the same. The coverage provided by this Endorsement to the Additional Insured shall not exceed the coverage available to the Named Insured, nor shall it exceed any statutory immunity, protection or limitation of liability enjoyed by the Named Insured. All other terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions apply and remain unchanged. UTAH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TRUST AI -E 2016.1 Page 2 of 2 PERMIT NUMBER: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Encroachment / Excavation Permit Application YOU ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THIS PERMIT IF: You plan to conduct work of any kind must within the City's Right - of -Way, dedicated public easements as well as City property, combined and here and after referred to as the City Managed Property, or "CMP": This includes but is not limited to: Flagging Operations, Facility and Utility installations, grading, landscaping, fence installation, tree trimming as well as any other process or procedure that requires access and use of the City CMP. PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS & PROCESS DESCRIPTION ARE INCLUDED ON PAGE 3 & 4 OF THIS FORM. PE 1 IT ADDRESS OR LOCATION — Describe the location and the limits of the area where Applicant is requesting to perform work in the CMP: 'MILT Park. Cl0r.qq Su7oom Ci ry 'ark lsr . -Atpr . From, t.3 Pa rNe Ave . -4- o 1 O C - W. I This Permit is requested for permission to perform the following activities within the CMP: G+ fl tI C ❑urn �Y FavJ t .\ r t O r t Ce.v4c m - r i s eta �-o old a tk-s a w. -u t �'ruv,V, pv- Ttre + • e.tlev4 t p,rt� •O eravy -k,4 a. y- ov. -&- oara s. we. wav $ 4-o eark 4 -IA v . ov\ PERMIT WINDOW REQUESTED: From: 4 0 / 30 / 1J To: 1O / 3 0 "— Hours work will be performed: From- 3 : 00 g/pm To- Lr :00 am/Em tN. e., t --. No work will be allowed before 7:00 AM and after 11}:00 PM unless emergency conditions exist and are approved In writing by the Public Works Director. Emergency condition approval must be attached to this permit, and a copy of this permit must remain on the Job at all times during construction. If emergency is life threatening, verbal permission may be given by the Public Works Director, City Engineer or a City Police Officer if necessary with written documentation of who approved the work, when and what circumstances required emergency work. Send the permission information to the Public Works Department as soon as possible, and attach a copy with the onsite permit. Cev.-Fe ASS) .25 � Project Manager (General Contractor): G C A� C.O U n� ro ppd v"�' Fa l 1 y Sal Business Phone: — ( G 5& Authorized Representative: She.rt\yVti $OwG4X / Title: ire 4or Mobile Phone: grin) gRi7—a'16(a Address: I W S . 300 E- . rc.oa6, (IA' g45 3 2. Email Address: SSOWGI.1 j gra �dcaut r,-Iry tk# 4l s . he -4 Facilities Owner (Company Name): Business Phone: Owner's Representative: Title: Mobile Phone: Owner's Address: Email Address: Sub -Contractors Name: Representative: Title: Mobile Phone: Applicant's Address: Email Address: List all Sub -Contractors: attach extra pages as needed Permit is hereby granted to the applicant subject to the following City of Moab Requirements for the accommodation of utilities and facilities within the CMP: All regulations for the control and protection of City Streets, such as City Design Standards and Construction Specification for excavation of City Streets and other improvements in the CMP, State Occupational Safety and Health Laws, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUFCD) and all other applicable rules and regulations and requirements must be adhered to and maintained at all times. Business Phone; PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING —The City will reserve a time and the appropriate City personnel will be present for pre -construction meetings which will be held every Thursday at 1:00 pm as needed prior to a permit being issued and prior to any work within the CMP. The only exception to this requirement will be minor projects with minor impacts which may only require a site visit with the applicant as approved by the Public Works Director. Even in this case, the meeting must be documented on this permit. For larger projects, notify all affected entities/utilities of the precanstruction meeting date and time with a documented request that a representative of each entity be present for larger projects. If the pre -construction meeting date and or time needs to be changed after application is approved, it must be re -scheduled with the Public Works Department prior to any work being conducted bathe CMP. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING DATE: TIME: am/pm LOCATION: Page 1 1 Rules a .41 Liabilltre Release Fornt • owLU those who have properLu registered their ve.LcLes caw ewter a vehi,cLe Lvt, the trui4,12, or treat evevit. i hose wawti,wg to sit LA, a chai,r, at a table, etc. Mast Let us 12v ow ahead of t'vvt,e ow the approprLate forvvt.. • Registered vehi,cLes should arri,ve wo soower thaw 1_02 vu. to begi.w setti wg up, a wd set t p weeds to be covupLeted b j 1:3O-i& ow the 30th • vet starts provuptLu at 2 p.vtt. &vewt ewds provuptLu at 5pvvt.. • R.egktered vehLcLes vA.u.st revual,w for the ewt're evewt u.wtil 5 p.vvt., ctoskre ti,vue. For sa fetj purposes, regLstered vehi,cLes w�LL wot be a(lowed to Leave the evewt uwtLL it Ls covupLeteL, over with. • ALL cawdL, should be iwdividuaLLU wrapped, awd wo homemade treats wilL be allowed, wo exceptiows. • • vehicles must be iwsured. • No sales are aLLowed. The evewt is ewtireLU -free of charge to aLL. R..eLease of Liabilitu avt,d H-oLd Ftarwiess Acl2wowtedgvuewt acl,v owiedge that mu participatiow iw this evewt cou.Ld possLbLU be a risk to mu OW IA, persow or propertu. t expressLu assume such risk awd release awd waive awu cLaivus agaiwst the c,rawd cou.wtt Fav ,11 support cewter @ i he christvu.as Box House awd the citj of Moab. sigwature pate TRUNK OR TREAT 2021 Entry Form Date: Saturday October 30th 2021 Time: 2pm-5pm Location: Swanny City Park Please Print Type of Entry (circle one) Individual Business Agency Name: Address: City: State: Zip: E -Mail: Contact Phone: License Plate Number(if applicable): Is the vehicle insured: (circle one) yes no Description of Vehicle: Special Consideration/Requests (next to another entry; special size,space) Apply early, since the number of available spots are limited. Applications accepted on a first -come, first -served basis. Return applications to: Grand County Family Support Center @ The Christmas Box House: • Email to; ssowelagrandcountyutah.net or corinaraneespence(&..gmail.com • Or deliver to 180 South 300 East (ring bell at the south side of the building) Between the hours of 10am and 5pm M -F Release of Liability and Hold Harmless Acknowledgment I acknowledge that I read the rules on the attached sheet and will abide by them. I acknowledge that my participation in this event could possibly be a risk to my own person or property. I expressly assume such risk and release and waive any claims against Grand County, including the Family Support Center @ The Christmas Box House and Moab City. Signature: Date: Questions or more information, contact The Family Support Center at 259-1658 Donations Accepted!!! Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Title: Dispersed Parking Cooperative Agreement with UDOT Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer Attachment(s): Attachment 1 – Dispersed Parking Cooperative Agreement with UDOT Attachment 2 – Utah Transportation Commission Fact Sheet Attachment 3 – Dispersed Parking Cost Estimate Recommended Motion: “I move to approve the Dispersed Parking Cooperative Agreement with UDOT and authorize the Mayor to sign it.” Background/Summary: In Senate Bill 277, the 2017 Legislature approved the use of $100 million for transportation improvements in areas with recreation and tourism activity that currently experience significant congestion. With that criteria, UDOT established a prioritization process and the Utah Transportation Commission identified four areas that warranted further evaluation, which included the City of Moab. This project was subsequently awarded funds in conjunction with two other projects: a trail in Spanish Valley and a microtransit project. The City is not directly involved with the trail project. Per the attached Cooperative Agreement the City will oversee design and construction of approximately 188 stalls of dispersed, on-street parking on 10 existing paved streets using asphalt. Also as part of the Agreement, Emma Blvd will be modified in use with the parking portions paid by UDOT and the roadway portions paid by the City (see Attachment 2 for Project Drawings and Details). The City set aside $400,000 for its share of the Emma Blvd improvements in this year’s approved budget (see Attachment 3 for Cost Estimates). The Agreement commits UDOT to reimburse up to $5,715,000 toward the project. If actual construction costs exceed this amount, project scope may be reduced, or Council may choose to contribute additional funds. If the City decides to terminate this agreement after it is finalized, it will reimburse UDOT for all costs incurred for the work, per the Agreement. City engineering and legal staff have reviewed the Agreement, and in accordance with previous Council and Arches Hotspot Committee actions, recommend it for approval. 1 of 3 Moab Dispersed Parking Agreement 9/20/2021 State of Utah Department of Transportation Cooperative Agreement Local Agency Performing Work for UDOT Project Description: Moab Dispersed Parking Local Agency: Moab City, Utah Estimated value of scope of work $5,715,000 Pin: 16912 Job/ Project: S-0191(167)125 Date Executed THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the executed date , by and between the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter referred to as “UDOT”, and MOAB CITY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as the “Local Agency.” UDOT requested that the Work be included in the Local Agency’s Project. Subject to the attached provisions, Local Agency will include the following items into its Project. Unless the parties agree to a lump sum, upon signing this Agreement, UDOT agrees that the costs shown are estimates and that it will be responsible for paying the actual costs associated with these items, based on unit bid prices, and actual quantities placed. If a lump sum payment is specified, UDOT will not pay for any additional costs beyond the lump sum payment amount. Description of Work: Work will be completed as presented to the Utah Transportation Commission on June 25, 2021 and includes the design and construction of approximately 188 stalls of parking on 10 streets using asphalt rather than stamped or colored concrete. All work will be completed by the Local Agency or its contractor to City approved standards. UDOT will reimburse only for items that would be included in a typical UDOT project – with an exception for aesthetic items. An allowance of up to 6% has been approved to be put towards landscaping and aesthetic treatments. Any improvements deemed by UDOT to be in this category and that exceed the allowable amount will be paid for by the Local Agency or removed from the project. This project was funded through the Utah Transportation Commission in conjunction with two other projects; a trail in Spanish Valley and a Microtransit project. Once this agreement is finalized, it is critical this project be completed. If the Local Agency should decide to terminate this agreement, it will reimburse UDOT for all costs incurred for the work. The Local Agency shall prepare a monthly or periodic invoice with appropriate documentation of the requested funds for reimbursement. The invoices shall be sent to: Devin Squire, Project Manager, UDOT, PIN #16912, 210 West 800 South, Richfield, Utah 84701 or dsquire@utah.gov. Costs to include: LUMP SUM PAYMENT: TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE PAID BY UDOT Up to but not to exceed $5,715,000. Any costs over this amount will be the responsibility of the Local Agency. Project Completion Date: December 31, 2022 (flexible) Billing must be submitted within 3 months of work completion date. If the actual costs exceed the agreed maximum total cost, Local Agency will immediately notify UDOT and UDOT can determine whether to reduce the scope of Work or continue with the Work at the increased cost. Once final UDOT signoff has occurred, the Local Agency will submit the receipts of payments for the Work to the UDOT Region office. UDOT will process the payment of the committed amount or the direct costs of approved activities, whichever is less, within 45 days and send a check to the Local Agency. Total Estimated Reimbursement to the Local Agency is $5,715,000 2 of 3 Moab Dispersed Parking Agreement 9/20/2021 Provisions Local Agency will include the UDOT’s Work provided UDOT pays the actual costs incurred for the Work. Local Agency’s contractor will perform the Work described in this Agreement in accordance with UDOT’s plans and specifications. Local Agency will notify UDOT two weeks in advance prior to starting the Work so UDOT may inspect the Work. UDOT has the right to inspect the Work but may choose not to exercise this right. Regardless of any inspection by UDOT, Local Agency is still required to construct the Work in accordance with the plans and specifications. UDOT, through its inspection of the Work, will provide Local Agency with information addressing any problems or concerns UDOT may have with acceptance of said Work. Upon completion of the Work, the Local Agency will contact UDOT for a final review and inspection. UDOT reserves the right to withhold payment unless the Work is completed to UDOT standards and specifications. The Local Agency has the right to correct any deficiencies in a timely manner and resubmit the Work for inspection and approval. I. Liability: UDOT and the Local Agency are both governmental entities subject to the Governmental Immunity Act. Each party agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the other party from any and all damages, claims, suits, costs, attorney’s fees and actions arising from or related to its actions or omissions or the acts or omissions of its officers, agents, or employees in connection with the performance and/or subject matter of this Agreement. The obligation to indemnify is limited to the dollar amounts set forth in the Governmental Immunity Act, provided said Act applies to the action or omission giving rise to the protections of this paragraph. This paragraph shall not be construed as a waiver of the protections of the Governmental Immunity Act by the parties. The indemnification in this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. II. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated as follows: a. By mutual agreement of the parties, in writing b. By either UDOT or the Local Agency for failure of the other party to fulfill their obligations as set forth in the provisions of this Agreement. Reasonable allowances will be made for circumstances beyond the control of the parties. Written notice of intent to terminate is required and shall specify the reasons for termination. If a party fails to cure the breach, the other party may terminate this Agreement. c. By UDOT for the convenience of the State upon written notice to the Local Agency. However, UDOT will be responsible for the costs incurred for the Work before the termination of the Agreement. III. Maintenance: Division of jurisdiction and responsibilities of state highways shall be in accordance with Utah Code Section 72-3-109 and applicable rules. IV. Payment and Reimbursement to Local Agency: UDOT shall be responsible for all actual costs associated with the Work described in this Agreement up to the maximum total cost or lump sum. The Local Agency must submit the billing within 3 months of the Work completion date. V. Change in Scope and Schedule: If Work scope or schedule changes from the original intent of this Agreement, UDOT will notify the Local Agency prior to changes being made. If the Local Agency modifies its Project and the modification affects the Work, Local Agency will immediately notify UDOT. In the event there are changes in the scope of the Work, extra work, or changes in the planned Work covered by this Agreement, a modification to this Agreement must be approved in writing by the parties prior to the start of work on the changes or additions. VI. Environmental Compliance The Local Agency will assure compliance of the Project with all applicable state and federal environmental statutes, regulations, rules, and permitting requirements. VII. Miscellaneous: Each party agrees to undertake and perform all further acts that are reasonably necessary to carry out the intent and purposes of the Agreement at the request of the other party. 3 of 3 Moab Dispersed Parking Agreement 9/20/2021 The failure of either party to insist upon strict compliance of any of the terms and conditions, or failure or delay by either party to exercise any rights or remedies provided in this Agreement, or by law, will not release either party from any obligations arising under this Agreement. This Agreement does not create any type of agency relationship, joint venture or partnership between the parties. Each party represents that it has the authority to enter into this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the parties. VIII. Content Review: Language content was reviewed and approved by the Utah AG’s office on February 2, 2015. Moab City Utah Department of Transportation By Date By Date Chuck Williams, City Engineer Devin Squire, Project Manager By Date By Date Mayor Emily Niehaus Monte Aldridge, Region Deputy Director By Date By Date Comptrollers Office Utah Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda Item Fact Sheet Commission Meeting Date: June 25, 2021 Agenda Item #: 7A-11 Agenda Item Title: 2021 STIP Amendment # 9 Arches Area Recreation Hotspot Program- New Projects Presented By: Ivan Hartle Background: Region PIN Project Name Action Amount Current Project Value Proposed Project Value 4 16912 Moab Dispersed Parking Scope Change & Reduce Funding ($2,510,000) of Recreational HotSpot Funds $8,225,000 $5,715,000 4 17383 Spanish Valley to Moab Shared Use Path Scope Change & Increase Funding $1,000,000 of Recreational HotSpot Funds $1,700,000 $2,700,000 4 18980 Grand County & Moab Shuttle/Transit Pilot Increase Funding $1,510,000 Recreational HotSpot Funds $75,000 $1,585,000 Program Value Justification: R4 UDOT collaborated with the Arches Hotspot Region Coordinating Committee to develop concepts for a suite of projects that will meet the needs of the communities and criteria of the funding. Each proposed project will help reduce support economic development, and increase recreation and tourism opportunities Arches/Moab area. The proposed projects include: 1. Dispersed parking to be developed on local streets within the core of downtown and in the northern business area off of Emma Blvd. This project will continue record the previous expenditures incurred on the original parking structure scope. 2. A shared use path along Spanish Valley Drive. This path will play a key role connecting affordable housing areas in the northern Spanish Valley to the downtown business area of Moab. This will provide an alternative to motor vehicle travel US -191 and thereby reducing commuter traffic and improving the quality of residents & recreational opportunities for visitors. 3. A five-year pilot transit program has been identified as a method to help mitigate congestion. This project will be a financial partnership between UDOT and $10,000,000 congestion, in the Moab to project in on life for the local community. This project will provide another alternative mode of transportation in the area while providing valuable insight into the future of transit in this part of the state. • Nine (9) street parking areas, plus Emma Boulevard reco • Total of 188 new parking stalls. Dispersed Street Parking Layout: 9.0' PARALLEL PARKING LANE 12.0' TRAVEL LANE 12 -FOOT PELE'STICAN U4T &AIL 33.0' MEDIAN PARKING 12.0' 9.0' TRAVEL PARALLEL LANE PARKING LANE 4.6' 12 -FOOT PEIDE.TRIAN 13cHT 4.0' K-F•CW CULINARY WATER X7C 11-INQ1 SANITARY SESEt 30-INO1 STORM GRAIN 3.5' MIS K-' m� 3a x pf— m maw EIVCJNEEEMG DEPARTMENT warm w DOWNTOWN PARKING RECONFIGURATION wMn MEDIAN PARKING CONCEPT DESIGN EAST CENTER STREET SC -1 mu 1.1 <- Tie into existing bike lanes on Miiicreek Dr. '...j ' _' ,!, QI Initial Microtransit Service Area ••• Fixed Route to be Established in Years 2 or 3: exact routing, bus stop locations, phasing, and frequency Ti3D Characteristics Requires 2-3 vehicles (10-12 passenger vans) 10-16 hours of service/day, dependent on season and contractor bids - Fixed route likely 4-5 miles in length, one-way 250-350 estimated riders/day Highlights I Start with microtransit service to understand demand and trip patterns. Add fixed route based on microtransit trip data and community feedback I Under a microtransit-based service, any two points could be combined within the zone. The vehicles are dynamically routed with the goal of maximizing shared rides. ✓ Once fixed route starts, microtransit would remain ✓ Covers all of Moab plus north hotels and upper Spanish Valley areas Exhibits/Handouts/Audio/Visualization: 8A-11 Arches Area Rec. Hot Spot Projects EXHIBIT - City of Moab Resolution 25-2021 7A-11 Arches Area Rec. Hot Spot Projects EXHIBIT II- Grand County Resolution #3280 Commission Action Requested: For Information/Review Only current STIP as detailed. X For Commission Approval Motion Needed for Approval: Motion to add the proposed projects to the Fact sheet prepared by: Monte Aldridge / Kayde Roberts Date Submitted: 6/3/21 Fact sheet reviewed by senior leader: Rick Torgerson $4,348,102 (109 Stalls)$6,765,406 (144 Stalls) $39,891 per Stall $46,982 per Stall $4,835,893 (153 Stalls)$7,253,197 (188 Stalls) $31,607 per Stall $38,581 per Stall $3,855,511 (109 Stalls)$6,056,690 (144 Stalls) $35,372 per Stall $42,060 per Stall $4,343,302 (153 Stalls)$6,544,480 (188 Stalls) $28,388 per Stall $34,811 per Stall $3,061,425 (109 Stalls)$4,899,600 (144 Stalls) $28,086 per Stall $34,025 per Stall $3,549,216 (153 Stalls)$5,387,391 (188 Stalls) $23,197 per Stall $28,656 per Stall Table 1 Emma Blvd etc. Summary of Hotspot Parking Capital Costs 9-28-2020 Incl. Emma Blvd per Stall (44 Stalls) $11,086 $487,791 Stamped Concrete Downtown Regular Concrete Downtown Asphalt Downtown Incl. Emma Blvd Incl. Emma Blvd 9 Streets7 Streets Item Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost 1 Mobilization LS 10% 1.0 $10,549 1.0 $14,799 1.0 $6,526 $31,874 2 Traffic Control LS 5% 1.0 $5,274 1.0 $7,400 1.0 $3,263 $15,937 3 Construction Layout and Staking LS 0.5% 1.0 $527 1.0 $740 1.0 $326 $1,594 4 Asphalt (4" thick)TON $107.37 342.0 $36,719 403.8 $43,354 226.1 $24,274 $104,348 5 Granular Borrow (4" thick)CY $30.00 174.6 $5,239 206.5 $6,195 115.6 $3,468 $14,902 6 Untreated Base Course (8" thick)CY $40.00 348.9 $13,957 412.6 $16,503 231.0 $9,240 $39,699 7 Sidewalk SF $7.95 3010.4 $23,932 0.0 $0 823.3 $6,545 $30,477 8 Type A Curb and Gutter LF $37.00 517.1 $19,131 1606.4 $59,437 512.8 $18,973 $97,541 9 Detectable Warning Surfaces (2x4 feet)EA $913.56 2.0 $1,827 20.0 $18,271 0.0 $0 $20,098 10 Mobilization-Message Crew/Thermoplastic EA $975.00 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 $2,925 11 Layout Pavement Marking LS $1,000.00 1.0 $1,000 1.0 $1,000 1.0 $1,000 $3,000 12 Pavement Marking-Thermoplastic Messages EA $375.00 7.0 $2,625 6.0 $2,250 2.0 $750 $5,625 13 Pavement Marking GAL $24.00 3.5 $84 0.3 $8 1.3 $32 $124 14 Aesthetic Treatments (Green Infrastructure) (7382 sf)LS 6% 1.0 $7,310.44 1.0 $10,255.84 1.0 $4,522.37 $22,088.64 15 Contingency LS 25% 1.0 $32,287.77 1.0 $45,296.61 1.0 $19,973.80 $97,558.18 $161,439 $226,483 $99,869 $487,791 $6,727 $56,621 $6,242 $11,086 Total Cost (44 Stalls) Emma Blvd On-street/Dispersed Parking Capital Cost Estimate 9-28-2020 Table 2 TOTAL AREA COST COST PER STALL Maxine Ave (24 Stalls) Minnie Lee Blvd (4 Stalls) Emma Parking Lot (16 Stalls) Item Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost 1 Mobilization LS 10% 1.0 $284,120.02 1.0 $442,075.03 2 Traffic Control LS 5% 1.0 $142,060.01 1.0 $221,037.51 3 Construction Layout and Staking LS 0.50% 1.0 $14,206.00 1.0 $22,103.75 4 Pavement Removal SY $25.00 6920.6 $173,014 10720.7 $268,019 5 Road Excavation 16"-18"CY $20.00 5225.8 $104,516 5225.8 $104,516 6 Remove Curb and Gutter LF $10.00 606.4 $6,064 1056.1 $10,561 7 Remove Tree, Tree Root EA $1,000.00 5.0 $5,000 5.0 $5,000 8 Remove Boulder EA $200.00 0.0 $0 5.0 $1,000 9 Remove Bush EA $200.00 0.0 $0 3.0 $600 10 Relocate Sign and Sign Post EA $250.00 0.0 $0 1.0 $250 11 Relocate Mailbox EA $700.00 0.0 $0 2.0 $1,400 12 Relocate Power Pole EA $9,000.00 1.0 $9,000 3.0 $27,000 13 Granular Borrow (4" thick)CY $30.00 769.0 $23,069 1191.2 $35,736 14 Untreated Base Course (8" thick)CY $40.00 1537.9 $61,516 2382.4 $95,295 15 Stamped Concrete (6" thick) Color A outside of stalls SF $18.00 24063.3 $433,140 34958.0 $629,245 16 Stamped Concrete (6" thick) Color B SF $18.00 30125.7 $542,263 44450.7 $800,112 17 New Asphalt 4" inch TON $107.37 310.1 $33,300 527.2 $56,605 18 Sewer Manhole Adjustment EA $400.00 7.0 $2,800 9.0 $3,600 19 Bollard EA $1,200.00 129.0 $154,800 201.0 $241,200 20 Street Light, Fixture EA $10,000.00 121.0 $1,210,000 202.0 $2,020,000 21 Type A Curb and Gutter LF $37.00 619.7 $22,928 1074.7 $39,766 22 Pavement Marking Paint- Red Curb LF $1.80 676.9 $1,218 1273.6 $2,293 23 Mobilization-Removal Equipment EA $975.00 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 24 Removal- Long Line (Water Blast)LF $0.65 2347.6 $1,526 2996.6 $1,948 25 Removal-Pavement Message (+1' white line)EA $45.00 49.8 $2,240 58.8 $2,645 26 Removal-Pavement Marking-Red Curb (Water Blast)LF $0.65 22.0 $14 22.0 $14 27 Layout Pavement Marking LS $1,000.00 1.0 $1,000 1.0 $1,000 28 Pavement Parking-White-Parking Stall GAL $24.00 24.8 $596 28.2 $677 29 Pavement Parking-Yellow GAL $24.00 1.1 $27 1.1 $27 30 Mobilization-Message Crew/Thermoplastic EA $975.00 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 31 Pavement Marking-Thermoplastic Messages EA $375.00 136.6 $51,218 187.4 $70,292 32 Aesthetic Treatments (TBD)LS 6% 1.0 $196,895 1.0 $306,358 33 Contingency LS 25% 1.0 $869,620 1.0 $1,353,081 $4,348,102 $6,765,406 $39,891 $46,982 Table 3 Downtown Parking Capital Cost Estimate 9-28-2020 Stamped Concrete TOTAL PROJECT COST COST PER STALL 7 Streets, 109 Stalls 9 Streets, 144 Stalls Number Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost 1 Mobilization LS 10% 1.0 $251,932 1.0 $395,765 2 Traffic Control LS 5% 1.0 $125,966 1.0 $197,883 3 Construction Layout and Staking LS 0.50% 1.0 $12,597 1.0 $19,788 4 Pavement Removal SY $25.00 6920.6 $173,014 10720.7 $268,019 5 Road Excavation 16"-18"CY $20.00 5225.8 $104,516 5225.8 $104,516 6 Remove Curb and Gutter LF $10.00 606.4 $6,064 1056.1 $10,561 7 Remove Tree, Tree Root EA $1,000.00 5.0 $5,000 5.0 $5,000 8 Remove Boulder EA $200.00 0.0 $0 5.0 $1,000 9 Remove Bush EA $200.00 0.0 $0 3.0 $600 10 Relocate Sign and Sign Post EA $250.00 0.0 $0 1.0 $250 11 Relocate Mailbox EA $700.00 0.0 $0 2.0 $1,400 12 Relocate Power Pole EA $9,000.00 1.0 $9,000 3.0 $27,000 13 Granular Borrow (4" thick)CY $30.00 769.0 $23,069 1191.2 $35,736 14 Untreated Base Course (8" thick)CY $40.00 1537.9 $61,516 2382.4 $95,295 15 Concrete (6" thick)SF $12.00 54189.1 $650,269 79408.7 $952,905 16 New Asphalt 4" inch TON $107.37 310.1 $33,300 527.2 $56,605 17 Sewer Manhole Adjustment EA $400.00 7.0 $2,800 9.0 $3,600 18 Bollard EA $1,200.00 129.0 $154,800 201.0 $241,200 19 Street Light, Fixture EA $10,000.00 121.0 $1,210,000 202.0 $2,020,000 20 Type A Curb and Gutter LF $37.00 619.7 $22,928 1074.7 $39,766 21 Pavement Marking Paint- Red Curb LF $1.80 676.9 $1,218 1273.6 $2,293 22 Mobilization-Removal Equipment EA $975.00 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 23 Removal- Long Line (Water Blast)LF $0.65 2347.6 $1,526 2996.6 $1,948 24 Removal-Pavement Message (+1' white line)EA $45.00 49.8 $2,240 58.8 $2,645 25 Removal-Pavement Marking-Red Curb (Water Blast)LF $0.65 22.0 $14 22.0 $14 26 Layout Pavement Marking LS $1,000.00 1.0 $1,000 1.0 $1,000 27 Pavement Parking-White-Parking Stall GAL $24.00 160.6 $3,854 584.6 $14,029 28 Pavement Parking-Yellow GAL $24.00 1.1 $27 1.1 $27 29 Mobilization-Message Crew/Thermoplastic EA $975.00 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 30 Pavement Marking-Thermoplastic Messages EA $375.00 136.6 $51,218 187.4 $70,292 31 Aesthetic Treatments (TBD)LS 6% 1.0 $174,589 1.0 $274,265 32 Contingency LS 25% 1.0 $771,102 1.0 $1,211,338 $3,855,511 $6,056,690 $35,372 $42,060 Regular Concrete Downtown Parking Capital Cost Estimate 9-28-2020 Table 4 7 Streets, 109 Stalls 9 Streets, 144 Stalls TOTAL PROJECT COST COST PER STALL Number Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost 1 Mobilization LS 10% 1.0 $200,044 1.0 $320,157 2 Traffic Control LS 5% 1.0 $100,022 1.0 $160,078 3 Construction Layout and Staking LS 0.50% 1.0 $10,002 1.0 $16,008 4 Pavement Removal SY $25.00 6920.6 $173,014 10720.7 $268,019 5 Road Excavation 16"CY $20.00 4764.9 $95,298 4764.9 $95,298 6 Remove Curb and Gutter LF $10.00 606.4 $6,064 1056.1 $10,561 7 Remove Tree, Tree Root EA $1,000.00 5.0 $5,000 5.0 $5,000 8 Remove Boulder EA $200.00 0.0 $0 5.0 $1,000 9 Remove Bush EA $200.00 0.0 $0 3.0 $600 10 Relocate Sign and Sign Post EA $250.00 0.0 $0 1.0 $250 11 Relocate Mailbox EA $700.00 0.0 $0 2.0 $1,400 12 Relocate Power Pole EA $9,000.00 1.0 $9,000 3.0 $27,000 13 Granular Borrow (4" thick)CY $30.00 769.0 $23,069 1191.2 $35,736 14 Untreated Base Course (8" thick)CY $40.00 1537.9 $61,516 2382.4 $95,295 15 Asphalt (4" thick)TON $107.37 1619.7 $173,904 2446.3 $262,646 16 Sewer Manhole Adjustment EA $400.00 7.0 $2,800 9.0 $3,600 17 Bollard EA $1,200.00 129.0 $154,800 201.0 $241,200 18 Street Light, Fixture EA $10,000.00 121.0 $1,210,000 202.0 $2,020,000 19 Type A Curb and Gutter LF $37.00 619.7 $22,928 1074.7 $39,766 20 Pavement Marking Paint- Red Curb LF $1.80 676.9 $1,218 1273.6 $2,293 21 Mobilization-Removal Equipment EA $975.00 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 22 Removal- Long Line (Water Blast)LF $0.65 2347.6 $1,526 2996.6 $1,948 23 Removal-Pavement Message (+1' white line)EA $45.00 49.8 $2,240 58.8 $2,645 24 Removal-Pavement Marking-Red Curb (Water Blast)LF $0.65 22.0 $14 22.0 $14 25 Layout Pavement Marking LS $1,000.00 1.0 $1,000 1.0 $1,000 26 Pavement Parking-White-Parking Stall GAL $24.00 160.6 $3,854 584.6 $14,029 27 Pavement Parking-Yellow GAL $24.00 1.1 $27 1.1 $27 28 Mobilization-Message Crew/Thermoplastic EA $975.00 1.0 $975 1.0 $975 29 Pavement Marking-Thermoplastic Messages EA $375.00 136.6 $51,218 187.4 $70,292 30 Aesthetic Treatments (TBD)LS 6% 1.0 $138,631 1.0 $221,869 31 Contingency LS 25% 1.0 $612,285 1.0 $979,920 $3,061,425 $4,899,600 $28,086 $34,025 Asphalt Downtown Parking Capital Cost Estimate 9-28-2020 Table 5 TOTAL PROJECT COST COST PER STALL 7 Streets, 109 Stalls 9 Streets, 144 Stalls Median Material Expense 7 Streets 9 Streets Electricity $40,000 $60,000 Miscellaneous $10,000 $15,000 Total Yearly Cost $50,000 $75,000 Design Life Cost (50 Years) $2,500,000 $3,750,000 Electricity $40,000 $60,000 Miscellaneous $10,000 $15,000 Total Yearly Cost $50,000 $75,000 Design Life Cost (50 Years) $2,500,000 $3,750,000 Electricity $40,000 $60,000 Striping (avg annual cost for 2-yr cycle) $5,000 $7,500 Chip Seal (avg annual cost for 10-yr cycle) $2,000 $2,500 Miscellaneous $10,000 $15,000 Total Yearly Cost $57,000 $85,000 Design Life Cost (50 Years) $2,850,000 $4,250,000 Maintenance Cost Estimate 9-28-2020 Table 6 Stamped Concrete Regular Concrete Asphalt Moab Shuttle Transit Study Prepared for: City of Moab September 22, 2021 UT21-2261 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 6 Study Goals ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Study Methodology .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Study Area Context ....................................................................................................................... 8 Population and Demographics ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Population .............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Demographics .....................................................................................................................................................................10 National Park Visitation Trends ............................................................................................................................................13 Bicycle and Pedestrian Network ...........................................................................................................................................16 Existing Facilities .........................................................................................................................................................................16 Notable Shared-Use Paths .....................................................................................................................................................17 On-Street Facility Types ...........................................................................................................................................................18 Existing Plans ...............................................................................................................................................................................18 Common Themes from Recent Planning Efforts ...................................................................................................19 COVID-19 Context .....................................................................................................................................................................19 Study Area Travel Assessment ................................................................................................... 21 Travel Market Analysis .............................................................................................................................................................21 Activity Centers ...................................................................................................................................................................21 Potential Trip Patterns .....................................................................................................................................................22 Travel Markets .....................................................................................................................................................................22 Moab Travel Trends ..................................................................................................................................................................23 Commute Characteristics ................................................................................................................................................23 Existing Transportation Services – Private Providers ...........................................................................................24 Stakeholder Input.......................................................................................................................................................................25 Common Themes...............................................................................................................................................................26 Important Service Characteristics ................................................................................................................................27 Challenges ............................................................................................................................................................................28 Service Alternatives Analysis ..................................................................................................... 29 Types of Services ........................................................................................................................................................................29 Fixed Route...........................................................................................................................................................................29 Paratransit .............................................................................................................................................................................29 Deviated Fixed Route .......................................................................................................................................................29 Microtransit ..........................................................................................................................................................................29 Passenger Fares ..........................................................................................................................................................................30 Service Alternative #1 – Fixed Route with Paratransit and Microtransit Zones ................................................30 Service Alternative #2 – Fixed Route with Deviated Zone .........................................................................................31 Service Alternative #3 – Microtransit Zone throughout Moab ................................................................................33 Service Alternative #4 – Flex Microtransit Route with Microtransit Zone ...........................................................34 Turn-Key Operating Budget Constraint ............................................................................................................................35 Typical Roles and Responsibilities .......................................................................................................................................36 Performance Evaluation Criteria ...........................................................................................................................................37 Stakeholder Input.......................................................................................................................................................................38 Recommended Service Alternative ........................................................................................... 39 Recommended Service Alternative Overview .................................................................................................................39 Financial Plan ...............................................................................................................................................................................40 Implementation Plan .................................................................................................................. 41 Service Delivery ...........................................................................................................................................................................41 Potential Vendors ..............................................................................................................................................................42 Service Adjustments and Monitoring Plan ......................................................................................................................42 Tracking Ridership .............................................................................................................................................................42 Tracking Ride Times ..........................................................................................................................................................43 Tracking User Experience ................................................................................................................................................43 Evaluating Service Area Scope .....................................................................................................................................43 Determining Service Changes .......................................................................................................................................44 Implementation Timeline ........................................................................................................................................................44 Phasing ...........................................................................................................................................................................................46 Fixed Route Vision .............................................................................................................................................................46 Service Contractor Considerations .............................................................................................................................46 Marketing, Branding, and Outreach ...................................................................................................................................46 Overall Marketing Strategy ............................................................................................................................................47 Branding ................................................................................................................................................................................47 Signage ..................................................................................................................................................................................49 Advertising ...........................................................................................................................................................................49 Outreach ................................................................................................................................................................................49 List of Figures Figure 1: Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 2. Project Process .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3. Population Growth in Moab (source: ACS 2010 – ACS 2019) .......................................................................... 8 Figure 4. Moab Population Density by Census Block Group (source: ACS 2019) ....................................................... 9 Figure 5. Moab Population Demographics (source: ACS 2019) ...................................................................................... 10 Figure 6. Groups That Typically Use Transit at a High Rate (source: ACS 2019) ...................................................... 11 Figure 7: Moab Median Income (source: ACS 2016 & ACS 2019) ................................................................................. 12 Figure 8: Moab Income (source: ACS 2019) ............................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 9: Moab Age Groups (source: ACS 2019) ................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 10: National Park Visitation 2009-2019 (source: National Park Service) ....................................................... 14 Figure 11: Arches and Canyonlands (respectively) National Parks Total Recreation Visitors (source: National Parks Service) ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 12: Arches National Park Economic Impact of Visitor Spending (National Parks Service) ..................... 16 Figure 13: Canyonlands National Park Economic Impact of Visitor Spending (National Parks Service) ........ 16 Figure 14: Moab City and Biking Routes (source: UDOT) .................................................................................................. 17 Figure 15: Striped Shoulder Bike Lane in Moab .................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 16: Moab Activity Center Density (source: Fehr & Peers) ................................................................................... 21 Figure 17: Moab Commute Mode Choice (source: ACS 2019) ........................................................................................ 23 Figure 18. Inflow/Outflow of Moab Job Counts (source: OnTheMap) ......................................................................... 24 Figure 19. Microtransit, how it works (source: High Valley Transit (UT)) ..................................................................... 30 Figure 20. Service Alternative #1 ................................................................................................................................................. 31 Figure 21. Service Alternative #2 ................................................................................................................................................. 32 Figure 22. Service Alternative #3 ................................................................................................................................................. 33 Figure 23. Service Alternative #4 ................................................................................................................................................. 34 Figure 24. Service Alternative #4 ................................................................................................................................................. 39 Figure 25. Example of visualization of trip patterns (courtesy of Downtowner) ...................................................... 43 Figure 26. Implementation Timeline .......................................................................................................................................... 45 Figure 27. Phasing Plan ................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Figure 28: Microtransit Vehicle Branding Examples ............................................................................................................ 48 List of Tables Table 1. Turn-Key Operating Budget Constraint .................................................................................................................. 35 Table 2. Typical Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................................................. 36 Table 3. Evaluation Performance Criteria Table ..................................................................................................................... 37 Table 4. Moab Region Transit Financial Plan - Operations ............................................................................................... 40 Page | 6 Introduction Study Goals The goal of the study is to develop an implementable plan for a new community transit system within Moab and the immediate area (study area shown in Figure 1). This new community transit system could be a fixed route bus, on-demand shuttle, commuter bus, or a combination thereof. The outcomes of the study have included: An assessment of the needs and opportunities. Development of transit service alternatives to address identified needs. A final preferred service alternative with detailed service characteristics (route, schedule, costs, etc.) and operating plan, as well as a financial plan. Support for a Request for Proposal (RFP) to select a vendor to operate the service. A final plan document with system performance criteria, presented herein. Figure 1: Study Area Page | 7 Study Methodology The methodology for this study has followed a process that built upon each step to ultimately develop an implementable community transit solution for Moab, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Project Process Travel Needs and Market Analysis •Completed February and March 2021 •Included stakeholder input Develop System Alternatives •Three alternatives developed •Stakeholder and Moab City Council meetings •Grand County presentation Operating and Financial Plan •6/5/21 –Moab City funding resolution •6/15 –Grand County funding resolution •6/22 –Moab/Grand County service plan refinement workshop Final Moab Transit Plan •UDOT Transportation Commission: June 2021 •Final Plan complete: July 2021 Service Contracting and Implementation •August 2021 –February 2022 •Goal of service start in March 2022 Page | 8 Study Area Context Population and Demographics Population The current population of the City of Moab is 5,268, and it has been growing at 0.7% per year since 2010 as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3. Population Growth in Moab (source: ACS 2010 – ACS 2019) 4700 4800 4900 5000 5100 5200 5300 Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Moab Population Page | 9 Most of Moab’s population is centered around the downtown core along US-191 as shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Moab Population Density by Census Block Group (source: ACS 2019) The population becomes less dense further from the intersection of Center Street and US-191. The northern sections of US-191 experience more dispersed populations than the southern sections of US- 191. This southern section of the US-191 corridor remains relatively populated into Spanish Valley in San Juan County. Page | 10 Demographics Figure 5 shows Moab residents by race and ethnicity. Figure 5. Moab Population Demographics (source: ACS 2019) Roughly three-quarters of the population in Moab is White (78%) and 14% is Hispanic. The remaining 8% of the population consists of Native American, Asian, Black or other mixed races. One way to understand where demand for transit is located is to analyze those demographic groups that typically use transit at high rates including: those living under the federal poverty level, those with no vehicle available to the household, younger residents, and older adult residents. Figure 6 shows the percentage of these populations most likely to take transit by Census Block Group (as mapped in Figure 4). It should be noted that this approach does mean that some people may fall into multiple categories. 78% 14% 4% 2%2%0% Moab Race & Ethnicity White Hispanic Native Asian 2+ Races Black Page | 11 Figure 6. Groups That Typically Use Transit at a High Rate (source: ACS 2019) Because the surrounding area is rural and dispersed, it is not surprising that most residents own a vehicle to get around. However, two Census Block Groups in Moab are home to a portion of residents without vehicles available to the household (shown as the dark orange bar in Figure 6) – North Central and Southwest Moab. This is important to note, as those without consistent access to a vehicle could benefit from a local transit system. East Bench/Slickrock and South-Central Moab are home to the highest portions of older residents who may experience physical limitations to mobility and thus may be inclined to consider using a new transit system. North Central and Northwest Moab are home to the greatest percentages of both youth and residents living below the federal poverty level. Experience has continually demonstrated that these populations are likely to take transit due to being too young to drive or because of economic limitations and could directly benefit from a transit system. Diving further into the income demographic, Figure 7 shows the change in median income from 2016 to 2019, and Figure 8 shows the distribution of income levels in 2019. 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% East Bench/Slickrock North CentralMoab Northwest Moab South CentralMoab Southwest Moab Demographic Groups Using Transit at a High Rate Under Federal Poverty Level No Vehicle Young (<18 Years Old)Old (65+ Years Old) Page | 12 Figure 7: Moab Median Income (source: ACS 2016 & ACS 2019) Figure 8: Moab Income (source: ACS 2019) As Figure 7 shows, most Moab Census Block Groups experienced an increase in median income from 2016-2019. As shown in Figure 8, North Central Moab also has one of the most even distribution of incomes among block groups. Along with this more equal distribution comes one of the highest number of residents with lower incomes, reflected in the high poverty rate from Figure 6. South Central and Southwest Moab also have relatively high numbers of low-income residents, with Southwest Moab $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 East Bench/Slickrock NorthCentralMoab NorthwestMoab SouthCentralMoab SouthwestMoab Block Group Moab Median Income 2016 2019 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 East Bench/Slickrock North CentralMoab NorthwestMoab South CentralMoab SouthwestMoab Nu m b e r o f B l o c k G r o u p R e s i d e n t s Block Group 2019 Moab Income < $25k $25k-$45k $45k-$125k > $125k Page | 13 showing the greatest income disparity. Lower-income residents are more likely to face individual mobility options and should be considered as service options are developed. Another important demographic determinant of potential transit use is age. People under the age of 18 and over the age of 65 tend, as a percentage, to use transit more frequently than people between 18 and 65. The Moab area is home to populations of all ages, as shown in Figure 9. Figure 9: Moab Age Groups (source: ACS 2019) Younger working age residents (ages 21-45 years) are the largest age group in each Moab Census Block Group. Young residents (ages 21 years and younger) and older residents (ages 64 years and older) tend to be the age groups with the most limited mobility options. Southwest Moab has a large number of younger and older residents, while North Central Moab is home to many younger residents. South Central Moab has the most equal distribution of age groups among the census blocks. National Park Visitation Trends The regional economy is heavily influenced by tourism, which can impact local transportation needs. Figure 10 shows steadily increasing visitation to both National Parks in the study area, with Arches National Park experiencing a significant rise in popularity over the past decade. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 East Bench /Slickrock North Central Moab Northwest Moab South Central Moab Southwest Moab Nu m b e r o f B l o c k G r o u p R e s i d e n t s Block Group Moab Ages (2019) < 21 Years 21-45 Years 45-64 Years >64 Years Page | 14 Figure 10: National Park Visitation 2009-2019 (source: National Park Service) With the two National Parks (Arches and Canyonlands), plus Deadhorse Point State Park, and numerous recreational sites on BLM lands, the Moab & Spanish Valley area can easily receive hundreds of thousands of visitors every year, as shown by Figure 11 below. 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 NATIONAL PARK VISITATION Arches Canyonlands Page | 15 Figure 11: Arches and Canyonlands (respectively) National Parks Total Recreation Visitors (source: National Parks Service) The influx of visitors contributes greatly to the area’s economy, as shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13. Page | 16 Figure 12: Arches National Park Economic Impact of Visitor Spending (National Parks Service) Figure 13: Canyonlands National Park Economic Impact of Visitor Spending (National Parks Service) Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Existing Facilities As most transit trips begin and end with either a biking or walking trip, it is important to understand the existing biking and walking routes, as shown in Figure 14. It is notable that the options for pedestrian crossings of US-191 are limited, especially in the northern part of Moab city limits, north of East 200 North. This is an important factor for fixed route transit routes, as it is preferrable to have stop pairing on either side of the street with a safe pedestrian crossing connecting the two so that the bus can run a linear route in both directions, with a northbound and a southbound stop connected by a highway crossing. Page | 17 Figure 14: Moab City and Biking Routes (source: UDOT) Notable Shared-Use Paths The Moab Canyon Pathway connects the northern edge of Moab with Arches National Park, Canyonlands National Park and Dead Horse Point State Park. A part of the US-191 widening project, the Pathway will be extended south to Emma Boulevard. The Mill Creek Parkway is a two-mile east-west facility that connects residential areas throughout Moab with Sand Flats Road and recreational opportunities to the east of the City. Page | 18 The planned Millsite Riverside Trail will be constructed on the site of a former uranium mine and will provide a connection to the North Moab Canyon Recreation Trail. On-Street Facility Types The City of Moab has striped bike lanes on a number of roadways including 400 N Street, 500 West Street, and 400 East Street. Facility types include striped bike lanes and marked shoulders such as the example shown below on 500 W Street (Figure 15). Figure 15: Striped Shoulder Bike Lane in Moab Existing Plans Moab Transportation Plan (2004) The Moab Transportation Master Plan (TMP) outlines several short-term and long-term projects, notably a transit system within Moab, a bypass feasibility study, implementation of an emergency vehicle pre- emption system, traffic calming infrastructure, and active transportation (walking and bicycling) safety improvements. Spanish Valley Area Plan (2018) San Juan County adopted the Spanish Valley Area plan to guide future development in the San Juan County section of Spanish Valley. The plan outlines mixed-use community cores with larger residential lots on the perimeter. Recreational areas should be linked with active transportation infrastructure. Service roads along US-191 should be constructed to serve new development. A well-connected transportation system that safely incorporates multiple modes of transit along US-191 is a guiding principle of the plan. Page | 19 Moab Downtown Plan (2019) The Moab Downtown Plan summarizes residents’ visions for downtown Moab given its growing tourist popularity. Due to the high levels of freight traffic along US-191/Main Street, residents would like traffic calming and congestion mitigation improvements, along with increased opportunities for active transportation. The community also noted that the Main Street corridor needs a balance of tourist and resident retail opportunities along with a unified community character in the downtown area. Moab & Spanish Valley Regional Transportation Plan (2021) Grand County, San Juan County, the City of Moab, the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA), and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) collaborated to form the following regional transportation vision in the Moab & Spanish Valley Regional Transportation Plan: "The Spanish Valley will have a transportation system that welcomes residents and visitors to access community amenities and recreational opportunities using a safe, efficient, and multi-modal system that moves people and goods reliably into, out of, and around the region." The plan recommends a public shuttle to a few key destinations in the area to alleviate parking problems and recommends connecting the airport in any future transit service as a multi-modal hub. Other Plans The City of Moab, Grand County, and UDOT have conducted several other plans in the study area: • US-191 Corridor Preservation Study (2015) – Grand County • Arches Area Recreation Hotspot (2018) – UDOT • Main Street Moab Bypass Planning Study (2018) – UDOT • Moab Parking Study (2019) – City of Moab • Spanish Valley Access Management Plan (2018) – Grand County • US-191 Truck Parking Study (2019) – UDOT Common Themes from Recent Planning Efforts With growing resident and tourist use of US-191 as a main thoroughfare, planners have been working to develop solutions to maintain community quality of life while still providing important north-south highway access for freight. Peak traffic has become a significant concern and is perceived to be exacerbated by the lack of a transit system which limits transportation mode choice options in the area. A bypass or limited access highway has been discussed to provide economic benefits for freight, but route options and community support are limited. Many traffic calming measures, active transportation infrastructure, and parking projects have also been considered in recent planning efforts, along with a possible transit or shuttle service. COVID-19 Context This community transit implementation study is taking place during unprecedented times that are important to note, specifically the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing impacts in 2021 with rising Delta variant cases and possible return to more restrictive health guidelines that may continue to Page | 20 create uneven travel patterns and unpredictable future economic conditions for the Moab area. Currently, a new community shuttle is envisioned for a 2022 launch, but it may be necessary to reassess community demand and possible public transit capacity restrictions ahead of launching a new transit solution. The conditions for success should be as optimal as possible, and ongoing pandemic challenges with getting people to use a new transit service may require a delayed service launch. Page | 21 Study Area Travel Assessment Travel Market Analysis A travel market analysis identifies who might use a new public transportation service, how they might use it, and where it needs to connect. Activity Centers Understanding where the current activity centers are within Moab and the surrounding region is a starting point for determining potential travel markets. As shown in Figure 16, and not surprisingly, the major activity center is downtown Moab, with concentrations of activity along US-191 from Colorado River bridge on the north side to the south end of Moab. More dispersed activity centers exist within the upper Spanish Valley area. Activity centers identified include: • Hotels and RV parks/campgrounds along US-191. • Downtown shopping, restaurants, and services along US-191/Main Street in downtown Moab. • Residential areas throughout the City of Moab and within Spanish Valley. • Outfitters and tour companies along US-191. • Schools, medical services, and social services within Moab. Figure 16: Moab Activity Center Density (source: Fehr & Peers) Page | 22 Potential Trip Patterns Through review of limited, available data and stakeholder input, the following potential trip patterns were identified. • From hotels, motels, and campgrounds north of Moab (as far as the hotels just north of the Colorado River) into downtown Moab • From hotels, motels, and campgrounds south of Moab (as far as the KOA campground) into downtown Moab • From Spanish Valley residential areas (as far south as Rim Village) into downtown Moab • From points throughout Moab and Spanish Valley to employment locations primarily along US- 191 • From hotels, motels, and campgrounds throughout the Moab area to close-in recreation spots such as Mill Creek/Power Dam and Rotary Park • Point-to-point within Moab city limits Identification of Top Trip Patterns The top three identified trip patterns include: 1. Hotels, motels, campgrounds, and RV parks (along US-191) to/from downtown Moab. 2. Upper Spanish Valley to/from downtown Moab. 3. Point-to-point within Moab city limits between a variety of origin and destination locations. Travel Markets The universe of all possible travel markets (users and user characteristics of a new transit service) includes a variety of potential users. It should be noted that many people fall into multiple potential travel market categories. • Visitors staying in a variety of lodging properties, primarily along US-191 from just north of the Colorado River to just south of Moab city limits • Employees living in Spanish Valley and working in Moab • Employees living and working in Moab • People with limited access to a vehicle • Older adults • Youth • People with limited mobility or mobility assistant devices • USU-Moab staff and students • People looking to hike or relax along Mill Creek Identification of Top Travel Markets and Trip Purposes The various information sources were used to help identify the following top travel markets: 1. Visitors traveling between their lodging properties and downtown Moab 2. Employees living in the upper Spanish Valley area and working in downtown Moab Page | 23 3. Residents of Moab, primarily youth, older adults, and those with limited access to a vehicle, needing to move around Moab for a variety of trip purposes through a variety of trip patterns Moab Travel Trends Commute Characteristics Commute mode choice is another important factor when considering transit markets. Driving alone represents the predominant travel mode in Moab as shown in Figure 17. Figure 17: Moab Commute Mode Choice (source: ACS 2019) While most residents commute by driving alone, as is common in a low-density community, a third of residents experience a different commute. Nearly 10% of residents bike and another near 10% work from home. Carpooling is slightly less popular than walking. While most employees in the City of Moab come from out of town, many live and work in Moab. Of those living in the City, about one third of residents work outside of Moab while the rest remain in Moab to work locally, as shown in Figure 18. 68% 6% 9% 7% 1%9% Moab Commute Mode (2019) Drove Alone Carpooled Biked Walked Other Worked From Home Page | 24 Figure 18. Inflow/Outflow of Moab Job Counts (source: OnTheMap) Existing Transportation Services – Private Providers Currently there is no public transit service operating within the study area. The private providers listed below provide transportation service to tourists seeking trailhead access, access to the Moab Canyonlands Airport, and intercity service. Canyonlands Shuttle On-demand transportation provider serving airports in Utah, western Colorado, and northern Arizona as well as connections to intercity bus and rail stations. In addition, Canyonlands Shuttle provides service to trailheads. https://www.canyonlandsshuttle.com/services Moab Express Provides airport service to Moab Canyonlands Airport and Grand Junction Airport. https://moabexpress.com/ Porcupine Shuttle Provides bike shuttle service to trailheads, airport service to Moab Canyonlands Airport and Grand Junction Airport, and offers intercity shuttles for tourists on extended one-way bicycle or river rafting trips. https://porcupineshuttle.com/ Page | 25 Raven Shuttle Provides shuttle service to trailheads for bicyclists and hikers, airport service to Moab Canyonlands Airport, Grand Junction Airport, and Salt Lake City Airport and offers intercity shuttles to destinations like Telluride or Durango. https://www.ravenshuttlemoab.com/ Roadrunner Shuttle Provides shuttle service to trailheads for bicyclists and hikers, river shuttles for rafting excursions, and airport transportation to Moab Canyonlands Airport, Grand Junction Airport, Salt Lake City Airport, and Telluride Airport. http://www.roadrunnershuttle.com/ Redrock Express The Redrock Express is a private shuttle service that provides recreation tours in Southern Utah. https://www.redrockexpress.com/ Coyote Shuttle The Coyote Shuttle serves private excursions for biking, rafting, and hiking trips. https://www.coyoteshuttle.com/ The Whole Enchilada Shuttle Co. A private provider serving biking trips with trailhead access. https://wholeenchiladashuttles.com/ Stakeholder Input To better understand the unique transportation needs of the Moab area, seven stakeholder interviews were conducted by Fehr & Peers staff in March of 2021. These stakeholder interviews afforded more in- depth conversations with representatives from a broad cross-section of community leaders and organizations in Moab. The stakeholders interviewed (and the constituents they represent) were chosen based on their historical and likely future involvement in the operations of a new transit system. The stakeholders interviewed included key representatives from: • City of Moab Administration • City of Moab Planning Department • City of Moab Public Works Department • City of Moab City Council Page | 26 • Grand County • Moab Area Travel Council • Moab Chamber of Commerce • HooDoo Moab by Hilton • Utah State University – Moab • National Park Service on behalf of Mill Creek Community Collaborative Each interview was conducted as a one-on-one session and lasted 30 minutes to one hour. Common Themes Many common themes were identified through the interviews. Need for Shuttle or Public Bus Almost all stakeholders interviewed indicated that they believe there is a need for a new public transit system or community shuttle and that a new shuttle would be beneficial to visitors and locals within and around Moab. Traffic and Parking Issues Most stakeholders mentioned the peak traffic and congestion issues that are perceived to happen more often each year – the potential for a shuttle to help alleviate traffic congestion, at least to some degree, was of importance to almost all stakeholders. Many stakeholders also indicated that a shuttle could help reduce parking demands, especially downtown and possibly at nearby trailheads such as Mill Creek Power Dam. Primarily Visitor-Focused Most stakeholders interviewed believed the target market for the service should be visitors, particularly moving visitors from area hotels to and from downtown. However, many stakeholders mentioned the need for the shuttle system to also serve locals, especially for getting people employed in the service industries to and from work, as well as helping get students to the new USU campus at US-191 and South Mill Creek Drive. Community Connectivity All stakeholders discussed the need to connect key destinations along the US-191 corridor, from the northern hotels at the Colorado River to the southern Moab city limits. Several stakeholders mentioned the need the connect to other destinations including points further south on US-191 such as the Old Spanish Area and points in the Spanish Valley area, primarily to serve people living here and working in downtown Moab. Two stakeholders mentioned that circulation with the Moab city limits would be helpful with connections to destinations such as the Senior Citizens Center, local parks, local schools, the Moab Regional Hospital, and Utah State University-Moab. Page | 27 Important Service Characteristics Stakeholders also weighed in on important service characteristics to consider in developing a new community shuttle system. Year-Round Versus Seasonal Service All stakeholder believed that a new transit service must operate at least from March through October. However, some stakeholders indicated that the shuttle should also operate during the winter months (with reduced service) to allow for consistency for local riders. Growth in visitation in November was noted by some, as well as busyness around Christmas week, that could require a longer season with almost year- round service. Scheduled and On-Demand Options Most stakeholders indicated that a frequent service running a fixed route along US-191 was important, but there was less consensus about whether an on-demand service for the Moab city limits made sense. Some thought that a flexible service, where users could request an on-demand trip in real-time using a smartphone app, could be helpful for some trip types within Moab. Bus Features There was not consensus among stakeholders on the types of buses for the service. Some thought that having bigger buses was critical and others thought smaller buses would be more appropriate. Many thought that open air buses, possibly rubber-tired trolleys, could help attract users while others thought that having comfortable buses with air-conditioning was important. Late Night Service There were differing opinions on how late a new shuttle service should operate. Most agreed that the shuttle should go until at least 7:00 PM, but some believed service was needed until 9:00 or 10:00 PM. Marketing and Branding All stakeholders believed that having a service with distinctively branded vehicles (with a Moab-feel) and extensive local marketing and advertising would be critical to the success and popularity of the service. Service Seven Days per Week Universally, stakeholders indicated that a new transit service would need to operate every day of the week during the months it operates. Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Many stakeholders identified the need for potential bus stops to incorporate safe bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure such as pathways, bus pull-out areas, defined crosswalks, sidewalks, and possibly pedestrian underpasses in areas where crosswalks are not possible, or no traffic signal exists such as the new USU campus. Page | 28 Park-and-Ride Lots Some stakeholders mentioned the need for park-and-ride lots on the north and south ends of a potential route along US-191 that would allow for potential riders to park and catch the bus into downtown Moab. Challenges Stakeholders identified many challenges to consider for implementing a new public transportation service. • Having the bus sitting in the same traffic as all other vehicles will impact the attractiveness of the shuttle and could create operational challenges in keeping the bus on schedule. • Alternative routes away from US-191 are limited and often congested. • Without strong branding and/or a unique vehicle (such as a trolley), a new public transportation shuttle may be difficult to distinguish from all other big vehicles on the road. • Providing enough service to have highly frequent service may be challenging with a limited budget. • Getting visitors who come to Moab with their vehicle (and often lots of toys and gear) to park and take the shuttle could be a “hard sell.” • Establishing new bus stops along Main Street (US-191) in downtown Moab will require removing parallel parking spots. • The limitations a shuttle may have in reducing peak traffic, considering the maximum number of people a shuttle could carry compared to the significant number of cars at peak times – a shuttle would have to operate at a very high level of service (for example, every 10 minutes or less) to make a noticeable difference in traffic. Page | 29 Service Alternatives Analysis Types of Services There are several types of transit services that contribute to a successful network. Every community experiences different opportunities and challenges that tilt toward one type of transit service over another, based on community needs, geography/topography, the roadway network, etc. This section describes the types of transit services included in the Moab Transit service alternatives. Fixed Route A fixed route bus service operates on predetermined routes, schedules, and stops. Passengers do not need to schedule the service in advance; simply showing up at a designated stop at the scheduled time is enough to catch the bus. Paratransit The Federal Transportation Authority (FTA) requires any fixed route to have complementary paratransit for those qualifying under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This service must be provided within ¾ of a mile of a bus route during the same operating period as the fixed route. Passengers riding paratransit must schedule their ride in advance to ensure pickup. While trips might need to be flexible in order to maintain service to the area, actual pickup times may not vary more than an hour from the requested pickup time. Deviated Fixed Route Similar to a fixed route, a deviated fixed route follows a set route but also has the flexibility to deviate ¾ of a mile off the route between stops to pick up those who can’t access existing bus stops. A deviated fixed route can serve ADA paratransit trips as well as the public without requiring a separate dedicated ADA van. Microtransit Microtransit is a newer form of transit service that utilizes a smartphone app (or a call-in service) to match trip requests in real-time. Small vans or shuttle buses operate a dynamic route with established time points or point-to-point trips within a defined area. Microtransit can also accommodate virtual stops (bus stops that can be requested via the app and are only served if requested), flag-down stops, and flex routes that combine on-demand zones with deviated fixed routes. Figure 19 demonstrates microtransit operational flow. The service can be contracted turn-key or operated by an agency with purchased ride- matching technology. Success of microtransit depends on the connection of low/medium density areas, the ability to group trips, and marketing. Page | 30 Figure 19. Microtransit, how it works (source: High Valley Transit (UT)) Passenger Fares Defining fare structure is a policy decision with significant ridership implications. As a new service that needs to attract new riders, it is important to create a fare structure that incentivizes use and creates ridership growth. Fares and ridership have an inverse elasticity in that as fares increase, ridership decreases, but not necessarily equally. The fare structure may need to be adjusted over time as the service develops and service demand changes For a new service in Moab, a free fare is recommended to attract new riders. As part of the service alternatives development, it was assumed that any new service would be fare-free to encourage ridership and shift from private vehicles to transit. Implementation of passenger fares can be evaluated after the five-year pilot program. Many other public transit services in areas with high levels of tourism operate without a fare: • High Valley Transit (Summit County, UT) • Park City Transit (Park City, UT) • RFTA in-town routes in Aspen, CO • START Bus in-town routes in Jackson, WY Service Alternative #1 – Fixed Route with Paratransit and Microtransit Zones Service Alternative #1 features a combination of fixed route, microtransit, and paratransit services. A fixed route operates along US-191 from the northern side of the Colorado River to Mill Creek Drive in southern Moab, with established stops along the way. A microtransit zone extends along the fixed route from 500 West to Mill Creek Drive. This microtransit zone is available to both the public and ADA-eligible riders. On the northern end of the fixed route where microtransit doesn’t operate, a paratransit zone provides a flexible service for those with accessibility challenges. Figure 20 shows the types of transit services and their respective geographical boundaries. Page | 31 Figure 20. Service Alternative #1 Service Alternative #1’s combination of fixed route (5.5 miles one-way), paratransit (2.4 mi2 zone), and microtransit (6.6 mi2 zone) requires one bus and one van with an estimated one-way travel time of 18-24 minutes from the north terminus at the route to the south terminus of the route. The fixed route operates with an hourly frequency with eleven hours of service per day. This service alternative is estimated to attract 150-250 riders per day. Service Alternative #2 – Fixed Route with Deviated Zone Service Alternative #2 features a deviated fixed route service operating along US-191 from the northern side of the Colorado River to Overlook Road in southern Moab, with established stops along the way. The deviated service includes a flex zone of ¾ of a mile in which passengers can schedule a pickup at a Page | 32 location within the flex zone that is not a designated stop. This fulfills the FTA requirement for ADA paratransit while also opening up this flexible service to the general public. Figure 21 shows the fixed route with the corresponding deviated zone. Figure 21. Service Alternative #2 Service Alternative #2’s deviated fixed route (4.6 miles one-way fixed route, 8 mi2 ADA deviated zone) is slightly shorter than Service Alternative #1 to allow for potential deviations. The deviated fixed route operates on a half-hour frequency with ten hours of service per day, requiring two buses with an estimated travel time of 20-26 minutes. This service alternative is estimated to attract 250-300 riders per day. Page | 33 Service Alternative #3 – Microtransit Zone throughout Moab Service Alternative #3 is a microtransit service throughout Moab from the north side of the Colorado River to Spanish Valley. Passengers can schedule the service for travel between any two points in the zone. At least one vehicle would be wheelchair accessible, fulfilling the FTA ADA paratransit requirements. A trip- matching technology would dynamically route vehicles to combine trips and passengers wherever possible to increase efficiency of the service. Figure 22 shows the extents of the microtransit service. Figure 22. Service Alternative #3 Page | 34 Service Alternative #3’s 6.5 mi2 microtransit zone requires two vans with an estimated response time of 10-15 minutes. The fixed route operates on hourly frequency with fourteen hours of service per day. This service alternative is estimated to attract 100-200 riders per day. Service Alternative #4 – Flex Microtransit Route with Microtransit Zone Service Alternative #4 features a combination of a flex microtransit route and a general microtransit service. A flex microtransit route operates along US-191 from the northern side of the Colorado River to Center Street in downtown Moab, with established stops along the way. A general microtransit zone also operates in downtown Moab, beginning at 400 North and extending south to Spanish Valley. Both the flex and general microtransit services are available to the public and ADA-eligible riders with accessible vehicles, fulfilling the FTA paratransit requirements. The overlap of zones in downtown Moab allows for transfers between services. Figure 23 shows the types of microtransit services and their respective geographical boundaries. Figure 23. Service Alternative #4 Page | 35 Service Alternative #4’s combination of flex route (3 miles one-way with 4.7 mi2 of flex zone) and microtransit (5.9 mi2 zone) requires two vans with an estimated travel time of 6-10 minutes on the flex route. The service operates fourteen hours per day with the fixed route operating on a half-hour frequency and the microtransit operating on a 10-15 minute response time. This service alternative is estimated to attract 250-300 riders per day. Turn-Key Operating Budget Constraint Implementing a “Turn-Key” operation is a proven way of quickly providing transit service to an area while minimizing capital costs and start-up challenges. Turn-key contractors are responsible for supplying everything necessary to deliver day-to-day operations including vehicles for operations, spare vehicles, supervision of service, drivers, dispatch function, and necessary smart phone app/ridematching technology for microtransit on-demand services. On the other hand, turn-key operations can potentially involve higher ongoing costs and less flexibility and control. Table 1 compares the turn-key operating budget constraint for the four service alternatives, assuming March through October season with seven days/week service. Table 1. Turn-Key Operating Budget Constraint Service Alternative Fleet Fixed Route Bus Cost On-demand Van Cost (microtransit or paratransit) Total Turn-key Operations Resulting hours of operation per day* Service Alternative 1 1 bus, 1 van $296,450 $202,125 $498,575 11 Service Alternative 2 2 buses $539,000 $0 $539,000 10 Service Alternative 3 or 4 2 vans $0 $514,500 $514,500 14 Source: Fehr & Peers. With buses being more expensive than vans, Service Alternative #2 is the most expensive option, even while operating at the least number of hours per day. Service Alternative #1 is the least expensive with nearly the same number of service hours as Service Alternative #2 but operating with only one bus and one van. Service Alternative #3 or #4 have a middle-ground budget, replacing all buses with vans yet operating on the most service hours of any of the alternatives. Page | 36 Typical Roles and Responsibilities The success of a transit service depends on the cooperation of the different parties involved. Table 2 describes the typical roles and responsibilities of each entity: UDOT, City of Moab, a Partner Organization, and the contract operator. Table 2. Typical Roles and Responsibilities UDOT City of Moab Partner Organizations Contract Operator • Administer state and federal funding • Manage funding allocation, award, and contracting process of rural transit funding • Ensure grantee compliance with state and federal regulations (e.g., ADA, Title VI, drug and alcohol testing, etc.) • Periodic reviews of grantee operations • Comply with terms of UDOT funding contract • Develop local matching funds • Oversee day-to-day operations of contractor • Bus stops and transit supportive on-street infrastructure • Review and resolve serious customer complaints • Other possibilities – provide/develop transit facility, provide/purchase transit vehicles, operate portion (or eventually all) of services • Support development of new funding sources • Provide additional funding for transit services • Market and promote the services • Advocate for community support of transit • Solicit feedback on service improvements and long-term development • Provide necessary vehicles, drivers, insurance, dispatch, supervisors, vehicle storage, fuel, maintenance, and microtransit ridematching technology • Operate service day- to-day according to the service plan • Be accountable to specific performance metrics and provide excellent customer service • Resolve minor customer complaints and service • Make suggestions on service improvements, based on operations knowledge Page | 37 Performance Evaluation Criteria In order to determine the best alternative for the City of Moab, Fehr & Peers developed a criteria table to evaluate the various service alternatives. Table 3 shows the performance evaluation criteria and each service alternative’s ranking. Green squares indicate a high (favorable) ranking, yellow indicate a medium (acceptable) ranking, and red indicate a low (unfavorable) ranking. Multiple service alternatives can receive the same ranking for one category. Table 3. Evaluation Performance Criteria Table Criteria OPTION 1 Fixed Route OPTION 2 Deviated Fixed Route OPTION 3 Microtransit OPTION 4 Flex Route with Microtransit (hybrid of 2 and 3) Frequent connections along US-191 Easy to understand for new users Passenger convenience (how is it use the service, once they know how it works) Ridership potential (ability to help with traffic) Ability to connect many destinations throughout Moab (coverage) Asset to locals Asset to visitors Ease of vehicle electrification Amount of service hours provided per day Service Alternative #4, a combination of Service Alternatives #2 and #3, received the highest overall rating. Page | 38 Stakeholder Input Stakeholders from the City of Moab, Grand County, as well as the original stakeholders interviewed, provided input on the highest-ranking alternative, Service Alternative #4. Generally, stakeholders liked the flexibility and geographic coverage of microtransit, and stakeholders saw the potential of a fixed route to move higher numbers of people. However, many people identified the challenge of planning a fixed route without understanding exactly where and when the route should run. To solve this challenge, a fifth and final alternative was developed, as described in the Recommended Service Alternative section. This recommended alternative concept is based around the idea of using microtransit, and the extensive origin-destination trip pattern data that it provides, as the first step in implementing a new transit solution for the Moab area. After one year of microtransit operations and a thorough review of its trip data, a fixed route would then be developed to link the high demand community origination and destination points. Microtransit would remain in place after year two and would help supplement the fixed route service and provide service to a larger geographic area. Page | 39 Recommended Service Alternative Recommended Service Alternative Overview The recommended service alternative is similar to Alternative #3 in that phase one features a single microtransit zone. However, the consultant recommends a second phase of service to establish a fixed route based on the initial phase’s microtransit trip trends. The initial microtransit service area will operate along US-191 and throughout the City of Moab, extending south to Spanish Valley. The second phase’s fixed route’s stop locations and routing will be determined by evaluating the feedback and trip trends of the microtransit service. Microtransit service would continue through the second phase, serving both the public and ADA-eligible riders, fulfilling the FTA paratransit requirements. Figure 24 shows the types of microtransit services and their respective geographical boundaries. Figure 24. Service Alternative #4 Page | 40 The Recommended Service Alternative’s phasing of microtransit (6.5 mi2 zone) and a later fixed route (roughly 4-5 miles one-way, exact routing is to be determined) requires two to three vans with an estimated response time of 10-15 minutes on the microtransit service. The service would operate ten to sixteen hours per day, depending on season and contractor bids. This service alternative is estimated to ultimately attract 200-300 riders per day. Financial Plan The 5-year pilot program for the recommended alternative can be roughly broken down into a year-by- year budget. Funding for the system comes from UDOT HotSpot program funding, City/County/Other local sources, and from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5311 Rural Transit Funding. Table 4 outlines the estimated year-by-year revenues and expenses for the transit service. It should be noted that the FTA 5311 program requires an application and is a competitive process; funding is not guaranteed and is an estimate only. Expenses do not include overhead costs such as City employees to oversee the contract and contractors, marketing and promotional costs, vehicle branding, and any on-street improvements such as bus stop signs or benches. An annual inflation factor was assumed for the turn-key contract. Table 4. Moab Region Transit Financial Plan - Operations Revenues YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 TOTALS for 5 YEARS UDOT HotSpot $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $1,500,000 City/County/Other Local $0 $60,000 $120,000 $230,000 $290,000 $700,000 FTA 5311 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $150,000 $400,000 REVENUE TOTALS $500,000 $510,000 $520,000 $530,000 $540,000 $2,600,000 Expenses YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 TOTALS for 5 YEARS Turn-key Operator Contract $500,000 $510,000 $520,000 $530,000 $540,000 $2,600,000 EXPENSE TOTALS $500,000 $510,000 $520,000 $530,000 $540,000 $2,600,000 NET $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Page | 41 Implementation Plan Service Delivery The Moab Regional Transit Service will be contracted through a third-party transit service provider. This provider will be determined through a competitive bidding process put on by the City of Moab. Fehr & Peers will deliver a Request for Proposal (RFP) document for the bidding process in a separate deliverable. Turn-key contracts involve delivering a service plan directly to a provider and relying on that provider to implement the service. The vendor is typically experienced in delivering fixed route, flex route, and on- demand transit service and will manage all aspects of the service. Advantages Disadvantages Quick deployment Requires oversight by sponsoring agency Does not require agency to have experience operating a transit service Flexibility, responsiveness, and adaptability are constrained to the terms of the contract and to the capacity of the vendor Does not require hiring of additional agency personnel (e.g. vehicle operators, administrative staff, maintenance teams) Less control of service quality, customer experience, and operational procedures Vendor is responsible for service quality and compliance Vehicle capital costs are included in the contract – minimizes the capital assets the agency must acquire Allows agency to take advantage of the vendor’s existing scale Page | 42 Potential Vendors There are several national vendors providing turn-key microtransit and flex/fixed route service today. These include Downtowner, RideCo, Spare Labs, Transloc, and Via, among others. These vendors provide service in a variety of communities, such as Summit County, UT; Park City, UT; Aspen, CO. There are also many local, regional, and national contract transit service providers who may be interested in participating in an RFP for microtransit and fixed route service provision within Moab. This project may also lend itself to a partnership between experienced transit contract service providers and technology companies providing microtransit platforms. Service Adjustments and Monitoring Plan The service plan provided in this memorandum is intended to serve as a roadmap for implementing the Moab transit service. While this service plan may prove to be effective for the life of the pilot, it is possible that the service may need to be adjusted periodically to better serve local needs. The following section describes elements of a monitoring plan that should be implemented early in the life of the pilot and used to determine whether and when service changes are needed. Tracking Ridership Use of the new transit service is a basic metric that the contract vendor will be able to provide to Moab on a regular basis. Ridership can be reported both as the total number of passenger trips per day and the average number of passengers per vehicle service hour. As discussed in the performance estimates section of this memorandum, the service is projected to have 200-300 passenger trips per day. Initially, the ridership may be much lower than this while the City and its partners build awareness about the service and community understanding of this new transportation resource grows. It is recommended that the goal for the first year of service should be an average of 100 to 150 passenger trips per day, growing to 200-250 passengers per day by year two and 250-300 passengers per day by year three. If the service is not meeting the ridership targets, then some additional analysis may be needed to pinpoint whether there are particular times of day when the service is utilized at a higher rate. If so, a determination can be made on whether a service span adjustment is needed. While ridership is a key metric, it should not be the single metric for measuring whether the pilot if performing successfully. When Moab is determining whether to extend the service, metrics like response time, rider satisfaction, and the rate at which the service completes the intended trip types should be among the factors considered. Page | 43 Tracking Ride Times The number of passengers that can be served within a daily service span is dictated, in part, by the amount of time vehicles spend completing trips and the amount of time vehicles spend responding to trip requests. It is assumed that single passenger trips will take, on average, 10 minutes from origin to destination. As noted in the performance estimates overview for the microtransit zone portion of the service, it is assumed that a 50% buffer should be added into trip time estimates since vehicles will either spend some time traveling to pick up a passenger or a passenger may share the vehicle with someone making an unrelated trip, which will likely extend the ride time for both individuals. Factoring in the buffer time, it is assumed each passenger will experience a 15-minute average trip time. If, after the first three months, the actual per passenger trip time exceeds 15 minutes, the service plan should be adjusted to better reflect local travel conditions. It is also projected that the average response time (or the time between when a passenger reserves a ride and when the vehicle arrives) should be 15 minutes. The selected vendor will be able to provide a response time by passenger trip. If it is found that the average response time is longer than 15 minutes, then changes may be needed in order to provide riders with a more accurate sense of potential response time. Tracking User Experience While metrics like ridership can convey system productivity, more qualitative indicators are also important. The experiences of early riders should be captured in order to learn any unanticipated issues with service provision. Rider feedback can be captured through post-trip surveys distributed electronically via the smartphone app. In order to ensure the highest response rate possible, it is recommended the survey be brief with two to three key questions. Since the contract vendor will track the quantitative aspects of each trip, like response time and time in vehicle, the survey can be used to assess ease of use of the reservation system, whether riders find the vehicles comfortable, whether riders have positive interactions with vehicle operators, and whether the rider overall travel experience has improved as a result of the new service. Evaluating Service Area Scope The initial service zone has been drawn based on the travel market assessment and stakeholder input. It is possible that some portions of the service area may be disproportionately heavy trip generators or popular destinations. Monitoring the origin and destinations patterns by trip will allow Moab to understand whether the service area needs to be modified or if there are particular origin-destination pairs and routes that are utilized at a high rate. The selected vendor will likely be able to provide visualizations of trip patterns like the Figure 25. Example of visualization of trip patterns (courtesy of Downtowner) Page | 44 example shown in Figure 25 to help Moab evaluate service utilization and potentially make adjustments such as narrowing the service area or establishing fixed pick-up/drop-off locations that serve popular destination. This data will also inform the envisioned second phase transition to incorporating a fixed route. Determining Service Changes While this service plan seeks to meet the needs of the Moab area travel market, it is possible that in practice the performance outcomes may differ from service goals as outlined here. Moab should be prepared to collaborate with the selected vendor on making service adjustments on as-needed basis to ensure the microtransit service and subsequent fixed route service are providing efficient service and filling a mobility need. It is recommended that Moab complete a thorough review of the performance metrics described in this service monitoring plan along with initial responses to the rider surveys after the first year of service. If any goals are being unmet or if initial rider satisfaction is low, then targeted service adjustments may be required. Implementation Timeline Moab and its partners wish to move quickly from project planning to implementation. Typically, a pilot project such as this could take 12 to 18 months to launch once a final service plan is complete, but it is possible to accelerate implementation and condense into six to nine months, assuming that contracting with a microtransit vendor could be done efficiently and that Moab and its community partners can move effectively through the various service preparation steps, shown in Figure 26. According to this timeline, it may be possible to have this new service operating by March of 2022. Page | 45 Figure 26. Implementation Timeline Finalize program management and oversight Select turn-key service operator and associated vehicle fleet Finalize budget and associated operating hours Select program name, logo, and brand 6 months before launch Develop marketing materials and advertising plan Formalize promotional partnerships with community groups Work with microtransit vendor on service plan adjustments Install any permanent infrastructure such as signage 3 months before launch Install vehicle brand graphics (vinyl wraps) Begin intensive advertising and promotion of program launch Coordinate with program partners and electeds about launch Test microtransit technology and dry-run service 1 month before launch Final planning, promotion, and coordination for launch event Determine performance monitoring program Launch event Intensive advertising and promotion of service Launch of operations Daily service quality monitoring Responsiveness to passenger complaints or input Weekly evaulation of performance metrics Intensive advertising and promotion of service Month 1 Review lessons learned in first month with vendor Intensive advertising and promotion of service Ongoing evaluation/monitoring/customer responsiveness Month 2 Implementation of possible service adjustments Ongoing advertising and promotion of service Ongoing evaluation/monitoring/customer responsiveness Report to electeds and community partners on early results Months 3-6 Plan for Year 2 of service and added fixed route phase Ongoing advertising and promotion of service Ongoing evaluation/monitoring/customer responsiveness Review and report on first year results Months 7+ Page | 46 Phasing The Recommended Service Alternative will be implemented in phases, as shown in Figure 27: Phase 1 with a microtransit zone service throughout Moab and into Spanish Valley, followed by a Phase 2 fixed route service in addition to the initial microtransit zone and a Phase 3 of span of service improvements. Since the microtransit zone can serve any two points within the zone and will combine trips where possible, the exact routing and stop locations of the Phase 2bfixed route will be determined through feedback and trip trend data from the initial microtransit zone. Figure 27. Phasing Plan Fixed Route Vision The vision is for ridership to grow sufficiently between key destinations along US-191 such that a fixed route will be able to serve larger numbers of riders most effectively, while microtransit will still be in place as the best option to cover larger geographic areas and serve trip patterns that are not suitable for fixed route. Service Contractor Considerations The turn-key contractor selected for microtransit and subsequent fixed route service should be selected based on experience, project/area understanding, project approach, capabilities and ability to deliver, qualifications of the team, references, and cost and overall value. A full list of vendor evaluation considerations will be developed as part of the RFP development deliverable. Marketing, Branding, and Outreach A critical aspect of program success is a robust marketing and outreach effort. An awareness building campaign should be paired with the service rollout to ensure community members and visitors learn of Phase 1 (First Year) One-year of microtransit zonal service in order to understand travel patterns and determine most effective fixed route. Phase 2 (Years 2 and 3) Learn from Phase 1 to establish fixed route in conjunction with retained microtransit service that also serves as ADA-required complementary paratransit for the fixed route. Phase 3 (Years 4+) Expand on Phases 1 and 2 to add late night service, early morning service, and more off-season service, as resources allow. Page | 47 the new service, understand how to request trips, and are aware of the service area. While traditional avenues, like visually compelling advertisements, will be important, additional community-specific outreach strategies should also be pursued. These can include engaging local stakeholders who have existing community ties to serve as ambassadors for the new service and establishing educational messaging that the new Moab area transit service is a public service that is open to all and highlighting the benefits of using the service (e.g., free, easy, fun). Overall Marketing Strategy In order for the Moab transit service to be successful, the City and its partners should place an emphasis on a broad and an ongoing outreach approach. With visitors making up the largest potential user group, the marketing of the service must be constant and ongoing, always seeking to reach visitors before, or as soon as possible after, they arrive in the Moab area. Partnerships with local lodging, tourist attractions, and broader community marketing efforts through the Moab Chamber of Commerce and Moab Area Travel Council should be a key strategy. The City should also partner with local businesses, schools, houses of worship, and other key destinations to post information about the new service. Beyond physical advertisements, the social media networks of these community partners can also be leveraged to broaden awareness. All marketing efforts should focus on educating visitors and community members about the service itself and also on conveying three key messages: 1. The Moab transit system is a new service that has been designed to help address the visitor and local transportation challenges, in particular traffic and congestion. 2. The service will be free, easy, and fun to use. 3. Moab will continuously seek rider feedback to learn how the new service can be optimized to best meet local travel needs. In order to effectively disseminate these messages, the City should work with community partners to develop a robust brand identity for the service and pursue a broad advertising and outreach campaign, as described below. To ensure the marketing campaign has an effective reach, the City can monitor who is utilizing the service through the rider surveys and then target marketing efforts to groups within the community who have not yet tried the new service. Having a dynamic marketing campaign that tailors messaging to the various audiences within Moab will help ensure ridership grows. Branding Applying a logo and uniform color scheme on vehicles and on all collateral related to the service will help establish a uniform brand. Brand awareness is critical to developing an understanding that the new Moab transit service is distinctive from existing trailhead and airport shuttles and that it is a new public transit service that is free to use. Figure 28 shows examples of branding from various microtransit or flex route transit systems. Developing a distinctive visual style for the system will help community members readily identify the transit vehicles. Page | 48 Figure 28: Microtransit Vehicle Branding Examples Page | 49 Signage Signage describing the new service and featuring the branding should be posted in all locations where it is likely community members will start or end rides. These signs can serve to designate pick-up and drop- off locations, which would make the system easier to use. High quality, visually compelling signs can be targeted to key market groups such as visitors, youth, and commuters. Advertising Signage can also be adapted into flyers that are posted in popular locations – having system information at all local hotels, motels, and campgrounds will be important and could take the form of a tabletop rack card with information on how to use the system and where it serves. In addition, the City can partner with local print media along with radio and TV stations to promote the service. While traditional media platforms have a wide reach, social media promotion is also a useful avenue to explore. Social media is particularly effective at reaching visitor audiences, which should be a key consideration in Moab. Outreach The City should leverage the existing network of community groups to raise awareness and promote the new service. Key stakeholders should be invited to serve as ambassadors for the new service. This role can be as simple as committing to including the Moab transit as a discussion topic in community events or promoting the service on an organization’s website and social media pages. The City can also collaborate with ambassadors to periodically visit popular destinations throughout the community and informally discuss the new service. Employer Partnerships Partnerships with local employers are another tool the City can utilize. Local businesses with employees who may not have reliable transportation should see the benefit of the new public transit service. Employees living south of Moab and within the microtransit zone will find it easy to use the new service to get to employment destinations downtown. School Partnerships Local schools can also advertise the new service. While some parents may not be comfortable allowing their child to walk or bike to school, local transit could be perceived as a safe and efficient travel option. Business Partnerships The City should work with Moab businesses to promote the new transit service. Having printed schedules or flyers in local retail establishments and restaurants that announce the new service and how to use it could be an effective way to gain awareness of the service. Businesses could also distribute information to employees and allow local ambassadors to present at staff meetings. Page | 50 Special Events The City should consider having a presence at all local events such as markets, visitor events, expos, kids’ events, and neighborhood parties. Setting a table with brochures and a friendly community ambassador is a relatively low-cost way to build awareness of the new service. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Title: Transit Pilot Cooperative Agreement with UDOT Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer Attachment(s): Attachment 1 – Transit Pilot Cooperative Agreement with UDOT Attachment 2 – Utah Transportation Commission Meeting Fact Sheet Attachment 3 – Financial Plan for Operations Attachment 4 – Moab Transit Shuttle Study Recommended Motion: “I move to approve the Transit Pilot Cooperative Agreement with UDOT and authorize the Mayor to sign it.” Background/Summary: In Senate Bill 277, the 2017 Legislature approved the use of $100 million for transportation improvements in areas with recreation and tourism activity that currently experience significant congestion. With that criteria, UDOT established a prioritization process and the Utah Transportation Commission identified four areas that warranted further evaluation, which included the City of Moab. This project was subsequently awarded funds (see Attachment 2) through the Utah Transportation Commission in conjunction with two other projects: a trail in Spanish Valley and a dispersed parking project in the City. The City is not directly involved with the trail project and the dispersed parking project will be addressed as a separate agenda item for Council. The agreement (see Attachment 1) establishes annual funding obligations and administrative roles between the City and UDOT for the development and operation of a shuttle service. UDOT has had a consultant prepare a Moab Transit Shuttle Study (see Attachment 4), which the City has reviewed and approved. UDOT will reimburse the City for up to $1,585,000 towards the project. City financial obligation (see Attachment 3) will be ongoing as long as the shuttle remains in service. City engineering and legal staff have reviewed the Agreement, and in accordance with previous Council and Arches Hotspot Committee actions, recommend it for approval. 1 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOAB AND THE UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PROVISION OF THE GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB SHUTTLE / TRANSIT PILOT THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), made and entered into on the executed date, by and between the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (“UDOT”), an agency of the State of Utah, and the CITY OF MOAB (“Moab”), a political subdivision of the State of Utah, hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties” for the provision of the Grand County and Moab Shuttle / Transit Pilot hereinafter referred to as “Transit Service.” RECITALS WHEREAS, Moab is authorized by Utah Code § 10-8-86 to organize, operate, and maintain a system for public transit; and WHEREAS, Moab does not currently operate a public transit service within Moab and the adjacent communities in Grand County, Utah nor does any nearby municipality; and WHEREAS, the State of Utah has determined a need exists to provide public transit service within Grand County, Utah; and WHEREAS, the Parties have determined it will be mutually beneficial and in the best interests of the residents of Moab and Grand County and the State of Utah to enter into this Agreement to provide a transit service. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows: SECTION 1: SPECIFIC TERMS 1.1 Moab Rights and Obligations. a. Moab shall: (i) Develop and execute an operational plan for Transit Service in coordination with UDOT. (ii) Complete a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit a third party microtransit service provider, adhering to all City and/or County established bidding rules and processes. (iii) Contract with a third party to provide a microtransit solution that services the area presented to the Utah Transportation Commission on June 25, 2021. (iv) Provide any required fleet maintenance or accommodations for transit vehicles providing services under this Agreement that are not already provided by the third party. (v) Contribute $700,000 in funds for the Transit Service per the agreed to 2 schedule: Year 1 = $0; Year 2 = $60,000; Year 3 = $120,000; Year 4 = $230,000; Year 5 = $290,000. (vi) Request periodic (may include monthly) payment from UDOT pursuant to the terms of this Agreement not to exceed the amount of $1,585,000 (excludes City Contribution, and any Federal Transit Authority (FTA) contributions) per the agreed to schedule: Year 1 = $500,000; Year 2 = $400,000; Year 3 = $300,000; Year 4 = $200,000; Year 5 = $100,000 (with $85,000 available to float). The City shall prepare an invoice with appropriate documentation of the requested funds for the Transit Service. The invoices shall be sent to: Devin Squire, Project Manager, UDOT, Pin #18980, 210 West 800 South, Richfield, Utah 84701 (vii) Provide to UDOT an annual financial report and detailed accounting of expenditures associated with establishing and operating Transit Service under this Agreement. (viii) Ensure the Transit Service complies with the FTA 5311 funding requirements. (ix) Provide the Transit Service for five (5) years of active service, or until terminated or renegotiated per Section 1.10. 1.2 UDOT Rights and Obligations. Within 30 days from receiving Moab’s invoice, UDOT will pay Moab the funds for the invoices that comply with this Agreement. 1.3 Fares. Fees and Other Additional Revenues. The Parties acknowledge that any fares, fees, or other additional revenues derived as a result of the Transit Service shall be used to supplement UDOT and City funding for the Transit Service and shall not be used for any other purpose. 1.4 Administration. Moab shall manage the Transit Service. Moab and its contractor shall be solely responsible for the operation, management, and administration of the service, including provision of vehicles, vehicle maintenance, insurance and accounting for the Transit Service and routes and will include this information in the yearly operational and financial reports to UDOT. 1.5 Audits. Upon UDOT’s request, Moab shall provide a copy of financial audits related to Transit Service that are performed for any year that Transit Service are provided under this Agreement. 1.6 Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all Parties and shall continue for five (5) years from the commencement of Transit Service under this Agreement or until terminated or renegotiated per Section 1.10. Moab shall provide written notice to UDOT of the commencement date of Transit Service. 1.10 Termination. a. The Parties understand and agree that the services under this Agreement are subject to and federal and state Laws governing the services. As a result, there is potential that requirements may change. While it is generally expected that the services under this Agreement extend through five (5) years, this Agreement may be terminated or renegotiated if any of the following conditions arise: (i) There is a substantial change in the cost, scope, or ridership of services; 3 (ii) Either Party or its contractor defaults in its obligations; or (iii) FTA or other governmental entity adopts laws or regulations or changes funding that significantly affect the services or cost of services to either Party. b. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement, either party may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice of such termination, specifying the effective date thereof, at least one (1) year prior to such date. Such notice is subject to paragraph 2.19 below. 1.11 Default. The occurrence of any of the following events shall constitute a default under this Agreement: a. UDOT fails to make payments within sixty (60) days of the request for payment that is supported by sufficient documentation. b. Moab fails to fulfill any of its obligations under this Agreement. c. In the event this Agreement is terminated due to default by Moab, Moab shall refund any unused or unobligated portion of its payments and Moab will provide a report showing expended funds were matched appropriately. d. In the event that service needs to be terminated, Moab and UDOT will negotiate terms of termination mutually agreed upon by both parties. 1.12 Dispute Resolution. The parties to this Agreement are governmental entities working together for mutual advantage. In the event a dispute arises with respect to this Agreement the parties agree to first submit the matter to non-binding mediation with a mediator agreeable to both parties. In the event that the parties are not able to resolve the dispute after participating in non-binding mediation, the venue for any subsequent legal action, if any, shall be the Seventh Judicial District Court for the State of Utah. SECTION 2: GENERAL TERMS 2.1 Recitals. The Recitals contained in this Agreement are incorporated into the Agreement. 2.2 Paragraph Headings. The paragraph and subparagraph headings used herein are for convenience only and shall not be considered in the interpretation of this Agreement. 2.3 Authorization. Each individual executing this Agreement does represent and warrant to each other so signing that he or she has been duly authorized to sign this Agreement in the capacity and for the entities set forth where he or she so signs. 2.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument and shall be filed immediately with the keeper of records of each Party. 2.5 Utah Law to Govern; Governmental Immunity. This Agreement has been drafted and executed in 4 the State of Utah. All questions concerning the meaning, intention, and enforcement of any of its terms or its validity shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah. Jurisdiction for any dispute and venue shall be in the Seventh Judicial District Court of the State of Utah. Both Parties to this Agreement are governmental entities under the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the requirements, protections, rights, defenses, or immunities granted to the Parties under the act. 2.6 Inducement. The drafting and execution of this Agreement has not been induced by any representation, statement, warranty, or agreement other than those herein expressed. 2.7 Integration. All agreements heretofore made in the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement between the Parties hereto are superseded by and merged into this Agreement, no statement or representation not embodied herein shall have any binding effect upon the Parties hereto and there shall be no amendments hereto except those in writing signed by the Parties hereto. 2.8 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence with regard to this Agreement as to each covenant, term, condition, representation, warranty and provision hereof. 2.9 Necessary Acts and Cooperation. The Parties hereby agree to do any act or thing and to execute any and all instruments required by this Agreement and which are necessary and proper to make effective the provisions of this Agreement. 2.10 Partial validity. If any portion of this Agreement shall be held invalid or inoperative, then insofar as is reasonable and possible: a. The remainder of this Agreement shall be considered valid and operative, and, b. Effect shall be given to the intent manifested by the portion held invalid or inoperative. 2.11 Ambiguities. This Agreement has been negotiated and drafted by all Parties hereto and the general rule of contract construction that ambiguities shall be construed against the draftsman shall have no application to this Agreement. 2.12 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to be a third-party beneficiary contract for the benefit of any third parties, including but not limited to any customer of any Party, and no such persons shall have any right of subrogation or cause of action against any Party for any breach or default by any Party hereunder. In addition, no third parties shall have any rights hereunder that would, in any way, restrict the Parties' right to modify or renew this Agreement at any time or in any manner. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to relieve or discharge the obligation or liability of any third persons to any Party to this Agreement. 2.13 Laws and Regulations. Any and all actions performed pursuant to this Agreement will comply fully with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations. 2.14 Binding on successors in interest. This Agreement shall bind the Parties hereto and their successors, heirs, assigns and representatives, and the obligations of the Parties shall survive closing and shall not merge with any document of title. 2.15 Assignment. No rights or obligations of any Party under this Agreement shall be assigned without the prior written consent of the Parties. This Agreement is voidable and subject to immediate 5 cancellation upon either Party becoming insolvent, or filing proceedings in bankruptcy or reorganization under Title XI, United States Code. 2.16 Notice. Any notice to be given or payment to be made hereunder shall have been properly given or made when received by the respective Party when deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: As to: City of Moab Attention: City Manager 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 As to: UDOT Attention: Region Director Pin #18980 210 West 800 South Richfield, Utah 84701 2.17 Waiver. The waiver by any Party to this Agreement of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach, whether of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. Any waiver shall be in writing and signed by the waiving Party. 2.18 Rights and Remedies. The Parties shall have all rights and remedies provided under applicable federal or state law for a breach or threatened breach of this Agreement. These rights and remedies shall not be mutually exclusive, and the exercise of one or more of these rights and remedies shall not preclude the exercise of any other rights and remedies. Each Party confirms that damages at law may be an inadequate remedy for a breach or threatened breach of any provision hereof and the respective rights and obligations of the Parties hereunder shall be enforceable by specific performance, injunction, or other equitable remedy. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to waive the sovereign immunity of the government Parties. 2.19 Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended except by written amendment signed by the Parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement on the date first above written. City of Moab Utah Department of Transportation Signature: Signature: Mayor Emily Niehaus Date: Monte Aldridge, R4 Deputy Director Date: Signature: Signature: Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Date: Renee Spooner, Legal Counsel for UDOT Date: Utah Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda Item Fact Sheet Commission Meeting Date: June 25, 2021 Agenda Item #: 7A-11 Agenda Item Title: 2021 STIP Amendment # 9 Arches Area Recreation Hotspot Program- New Projects Presented By: Ivan Hartle Background: Region PIN Project Name Action Amount Current Project Value Proposed Project Value 4 16912 Moab Dispersed Parking Scope Change & Reduce Funding ($2,510,000) of Recreational HotSpot Funds $8,225,000 $5,715,000 4 17383 Spanish Valley to Moab Shared Use Path Scope Change & Increase Funding $1,000,000 of Recreational HotSpot Funds $1,700,000 $2,700,000 4 18980 Grand County & Moab Shuttle/Transit Pilot Increase Funding $1,510,000 Recreational HotSpot Funds $75,000 $1,585,000 Program Value Justification: R4 UDOT collaborated with the Arches Hotspot Region Coordinating Committee to develop concepts for a suite of projects that will meet the needs of the communities and criteria of the funding. Each proposed project will help reduce support economic development, and increase recreation and tourism opportunities Arches/Moab area. The proposed projects include: 1. Dispersed parking to be developed on local streets within the core of downtown and in the northern business area off of Emma Blvd. This project will continue record the previous expenditures incurred on the original parking structure scope. 2. A shared use path along Spanish Valley Drive. This path will play a key role connecting affordable housing areas in the northern Spanish Valley to the downtown business area of Moab. This will provide an alternative to motor vehicle travel US -191 and thereby reducing commuter traffic and improving the quality of residents & recreational opportunities for visitors. 3. A five-year pilot transit program has been identified as a method to help mitigate congestion. This project will be a financial partnership between UDOT and $10,000,000 congestion, in the Moab to project in on life for the local community. This project will provide another alternative mode of transportation in the area while providing valuable insight into the future of transit in this part of the state. • Nine (9) street parking areas, plus Emma Boulevard reco • Total of 188 new parking stalls. Dispersed Street Parking Layout: 9.0' PARALLEL PARKING LANE 12.0' TRAVEL LANE 12 -FOOT PELE'STICAN U4T &AIL 33.0' MEDIAN PARKING 12.0' 9.0' TRAVEL PARALLEL LANE PARKING LANE 4.6' 12 -FOOT PEIDE.TRIAN 13cHT 4.0' K-F•CW CULINARY WATER X7C 11-INQ1 SANITARY SESEt 30-INO1 STORM GRAIN 3.5' MIS K-' m� 3a x pf— m maw EIVCJNEEEMG DEPARTMENT warm w DOWNTOWN PARKING RECONFIGURATION wMn MEDIAN PARKING CONCEPT DESIGN EAST CENTER STREET SC -1 mu 1.1 <- Tie into existing bike lanes on Miiicreek Dr. '...j ' _' ,!, QI Initial Microtransit Service Area ••• Fixed Route to be Established in Years 2 or 3: exact routing, bus stop locations, phasing, and frequency Ti3D Characteristics Requires 2-3 vehicles (10-12 passenger vans) 10-16 hours of service/day, dependent on season and contractor bids - Fixed route likely 4-5 miles in length, one-way 250-350 estimated riders/day Highlights I Start with microtransit service to understand demand and trip patterns. Add fixed route based on microtransit trip data and community feedback I Under a microtransit-based service, any two points could be combined within the zone. The vehicles are dynamically routed with the goal of maximizing shared rides. ✓ Once fixed route starts, microtransit would remain ✓ Covers all of Moab plus north hotels and upper Spanish Valley areas Exhibits/Handouts/Audio/Visualization: 8A-11 Arches Area Rec. Hot Spot Projects EXHIBIT - City of Moab Resolution 25-2021 7A-11 Arches Area Rec. Hot Spot Projects EXHIBIT II- Grand County Resolution #3280 Commission Action Requested: For Information/Review Only current STIP as detailed. X For Commission Approval Motion Needed for Approval: Motion to add the proposed projects to the Fact sheet prepared by: Monte Aldridge / Kayde Roberts Date Submitted: 6/3/21 Fact sheet reviewed by senior leader: Rick Torgerson Table 4. Moab Region Transit Financial Plan - Operations Revenues' UDOT HotSpot City/County/Other Local FTA 53112 REVENUE TOTALS Expenses' Turn -key Operator Contract EXPENSE TOTALS YEAR T■ $500,000 $0 $500,000 YEAR 2 $400,000 $60,000 $50,000 $510,000 YEAR 1 YEAR 2 $500,000 $500,000 $510,000 $510,000 YEAR 3 $300,000 $120,000 $100,000 $520,000 YEAR 3 $520,000 $520,000 YEAR 4 $200,000 $230,000 $100,000 $530,000 YEAR 4 $530,000 $530,000 YEAR 5 $100,000 $290,000 $150,000 $540,000 YEAR 5 $540,000 $540,000 TOTALS for 5 YEARS $1,500,000 $700,000 $400,000 $2,600,000 TOTALS for 5 YEARS $2,600,000 $2,600,000 NET $0 $0 $0 $0 Moab City Council Agenda Item Kopell Lot Line Adjustment Petition Meeting Date: August 10, 2021 Title: Consideration and Possible Approval of Moab City Resolution #30-2021 – A Resolution Approving the Lot Line Adjustment of property located at 374 W 200 S, and 396 W 200 S, Moab UT 84532. Disposition: Discussion and Possible Action Staff Presenter: Cory P. Shurtleff, Assistant Planner Attachment(s): - Exhibit 1: Moab City Resolution #30-2021 - Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map - Exhibit 3: Recorded County Plat - Exhibit 4: Draft Survey Plat - Exhibit 5: State Code 10-9A-608 - Exhibit 6: Adjustment Area Detail Options: 1. Approve with or without modifications; or 2. Continue or table item and give specific direction to the applicant and staff as to additional information needed; or 3. Deny Petition Recommended Motion: I move that the Moab City Council approve Moab City Resolution #30-2021 – A Resolution Approving the Lot Line Adjustment of property located at 374 W 200 S, and 396 W 200 S, Moab UT 84532. Applicant: Philip & Jeanette Kopell, Property Owner Background: Applicants, Philip & Jeanette Kopell, submitted the City of Moab Petition to Vacate, Alter, or Amend a Subdivision Plat, Utah State Code 10-9A-608(2)(a), on September 1, 2021, for the Lot Line Adjustment of a property line on 374 W 200 S, adjacent to property 396 W 200 S, owned by Kopell, Philip A Co-Trustee. On September 1, 2021, sufficient materials, in the form of a draft plat survey generated to show the Parcel Boundary Line Adjustment, and Parcel Legal Description, along with the signed and notarized petition were submitted to City Staff. On September 21, 2021, the petition application was officially submitted for review at the City Council Meeting held on September 28, 2021. Project Summary: Location: 374 & 396 West 200 South, Moab UT Property Owner: Kopell, Philip A Trustee Adjacent Owner: Kopell, Philip A Co-Trustee Subject Parcel: #01-0001-0163 Adjacent Parcel: #01-0001-0257 Proposed Parcel1: 34,314 sf, 0.79 Acres Proposed Parcel2: 318,940 sf, 7.32 Acres Zoning: RA-1 Residential Agricultural Zone Narrative Summary: Applicants and Property Owners, Philip and Jeanette Kopell, submitted the Petition to Alter their parcel boundary at 374 West 200 South, adjacent to their other property at 396 West 200 South. This lot line adjustment would increase their 374 West property 40.42’ to the north and allow for a 15’ wide utility easement along the east boundary of the new adjustment area. The reason for this transfer of land was to include the existing corral within the adjustment area in the 374 west property. Process: Utah State Code Section 10-9A-608 (Attachment 4) addresses this situation: 10-9a-608-14 Unless a local ordinance provides otherwise, the public hearing requirement of Subsection (1)(c) does not apply and a land use authority may consider at a public meeting an owner’s petition to vacate or amend a subdivision plat if: a) The petition seeks to: (…) d) adjust the lot lines of adjoining lots or parcels if the fee owners of each of the adjoining lots or parcels join in the petition, regardless of whether the lots or parcels are located in the same subdivision. Moab Municipal Code (16.08.050) includes a public hearing exemption for an amended plat if owners of both parcels sign the petition. The City Council has the authority to approve the plat amendment at a public meeting without a public hearing. CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 30 -2021 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 374 WEST 200 SOUTH, AND 396 WEST 200 SOUTH, MOAB, UT 84532. WHEREAS, The following describes the intent and purpose of this resolution: a. Applicants and Property Owners, Philip and Jeanette Kopell, wish to adjust the parcel boundary of their property at 374 W 200 S, adjacent to their other property located at 396 W 200 S, Moab UT; and b. The Applicants submitted to the City of Moab the appropriate application and documents for review and approval of the proposed Plat Amendment as required in MMC Chapter 16; and c. The property is in the RA-1 Residential Agricultural Zone and the existing residential uses are allowed as a permitted use; and d. Owners desire to adjust the parcel boundary of Parcel #01-0001-0163, creating a 34,314 square foot (0.79 acres) parcel, and reducing the adjacent Parcel #01-0001-0257, to 318,940 square feet (7.32 acres); and e. Utah State Code Section 10-9a-608-14 states that no public hearing is required for a petition that seeks to adjust the lot lines of adjoining lots or parcels if the fee owners of each of the adjoining lots or parcels join in the petition, regardless of whether the lots or parcels are located in the same subdivision; and f. Moab Municipal Code Section 16.08.050 allows the City Council to approve plat amendments at a public meeting without a public hearing. g. Following the consideration of the technical aspects of the pertinent code sections, the Moab City Council, pursuant to Resolution #30-2021, hereby finds, that the Plat Amendment can meet or exceeds the pertinent code requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL, the application for the Kopell Lot Line Adjustment Petition, Resolution #30-2021 is hereby APPROVED. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on September 28, 2021. SIGNED: ________________________________ Emily Niehaus, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder CO: !7; 1985 RA -1 Zone N Floodway - No Build Zone 38°34'16.85" 11 109°33'33.23" NW1/4SW1/4 SECTION 1 T26S R21E SLB&M 117331.30 N 54474.26 E 41.145134a Y1inr S[I OS MB ft' N550ill W.Ib ¢YLYWAMSI°: 4SL UEY 1055 nn5.r L N WI ITV 1 .44'4 7e4•057 �a 144,123 0mwwmA Jw11tnLvontISM 114, MIS OVEALAP WASCREATEDLWSU ASSUMED OCTANCE SEE (KD OK 21.1 I 150 THAT LAMS WASGA.1E4 As W D Eumm 13.11114 TO K=PD4 TRUST RIILIF. A ISOM TKOS TEE SLUE A KIISIJG KLV IX MILE TRUST 01-0114160 ife 0L°aAUJwI uusocaams.11Ltu 01414150 ClIntrrlar et 01414169 n GED Main 14644404444, 14(14044.111% PRISM c14,616 tIoNCOPOLO. golittaLS444" ILUI AW r 4.54W 24,1 t. sat S DOUGLAS! MARY SUSAN LICIALJ 4IUN 01 40141t4 N89°26'4CE 1317.58' PMDYPAKOPELL TRUSTEE JE W ETTE KOPIJI. TRUST= THE Koe=1 FAMILY u.TNG TRUST...M.1. 014014:5) )LSW:WS KEVIND(NALE 0141456 Oral 24W. SOS. Hr3n'nn �°MLORJ� 2333+ 1a11.W'-1AL44 SBYI6111LIO AMS SUAS MCIALK.M(tAU1WJN MARY SUSAN' M(tAUOIEP 01401-0166 COD LI W 01001416* G2® ��YTIIRYIYAND IS n,LTTAWWYTI(6T 1e 132115 THIS PLAT IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF ASSISTING IN LOCATING THE LAND. AND THE RECORDER'S OFFICE ASSUMES NO LIABLILITY FOR VARIATIONS W ANY. WITH AN ACTUAL SURVEY. LARRY C VAN SIXES EIRYTES OAR 0 VAN SINK. TELSTEE LIMY &GAIL D SLYKE KE%TMARLE TRUST 01401-0IM S W`:1% I.WT WEST`.OISOU111 —363W — — ImrtI035 RORY PAXWN „..„_Ae n RACHEL PAXMAS „..„_AR„,,...„..„_AR„,,... MIX ROAD \'V5A'IITI/ 01-014=T( ElmTCLWAT LOTI LCA't 01.41144001 1,4W 4105 117344.03 N 55791.78 E OR TOWN SUBDIVISION S N hi WAR STATE RWD(CMMLSSWN 014141] GIIiLD �A -1490 LSI W]YS R f°O 411744 1 L-AI00 (4TM®L L-IY.f 01.TDM0m Utah Code Effective 5/14/2019 10-9a-608 Vacating, altering, or amending a subdivision plat. (1) 11-A fee owner of land, as shown on the last county assessment roll, in a subdivision that has been laid out and platted as provided in this part may file a written petition with the land use authority to have some or all of the plat vacated or amended. 12 -If a petition is filed under Subsection (1)(a), the land use authority shall provide notice of the petition by mail, email, or other effective means to each affected entity that provides a service to an owner of record of the portion of the plat that is being vacated or amended at least 10 calendar days before the land use authority may approve the vacation or amendment of the plat. 13 -If a petition is filed under Subsection (1)(a), the land use authority shall hold a public hearing within 45 days after the day on which the petition is filed if: (i) any owner within the plat notifies the municipality of the owner's objection in writing within 10 days of mailed notification; or (ii)a public hearing is required because all of the owners in the subdivision have not signed the revised plat. 14 -Unless a local ordinance provides otherwise, the public hearing requirement of Subsection (1)(c) does not apply and a land use authority may consider at a public meeting an owner's petition to vacate or amend a subdivision plat if: (a) the petition seeks to: (b) join two or more of the petitioner fee owner's contiguous lots; (c) subdivide one or more of the petitioning fee owner's lots, if the subdivision will not result in a violation of a land use ordinance or a development condition; (d) adjust the lot lines of adjoining lots or parcels if the fee owners of each of the adjoining lots or parcels join in the petition, regardless of whether the lots or parcels are located in the same subdivision; (e) on a lot owned by the petitioning fee owner, adjust an internal lot restriction imposed by the local political subdivision; or (f) alter the plat in a manner that does not change existing boundaries or other attributes of lots within the subdivision that are not: (A) owned by the petitioner; or (B) designated as a common area; and (g) notice has been given to adjacent property owners in accordance with any applicable local ordinance. 15 -Each request to vacate or amend a plat that contains a request to vacate or amend a public street or municipal utility easement is also subject to Section 10-9a-609.5. 16 -Each petition to vacate or amend an entire plat or a portion of a plat shall include: (a) the name and address of each owner of record of the land contained in the entire plat or on that portion of the plat described in the petition; and (b) the signature of each owner described in Subsection (4)(a) who consents to the petition. (5) (a) The owners of record of adjacent parcels that are described by either a metes and bounds description or by a recorded plat may exchange title to portions of those parcels if the exchange of title is approved by the land use authority in accordance with Subsection (5)(b). (b) The land use authority shall approve an exchange of title under Subsection (5)(a) if the exchange of title will not result in a violation of any land use ordinance. (c) If an exchange of title is approved under Subsection (5)(b): Page 1 Utah Code (i) a notice of approval shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder which: (A) is executed by each owner included in the exchange and by the land use authority; (B) contains an acknowledgment for each party executing the notice in accordance with the provisions of Title 57, Chapter 2a, Recognition of Acknowledgments Act; and (C) recites the descriptions of both the original parcels and the parcels created by the exchange of title; and (ii) a document of conveyance shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder. (d) A notice of approval recorded under this Subsection (5) does not act as a conveyance of title to real property and is not required in order to record a document conveying title to real property. (6) (a) The name of a recorded subdivision may be changed by recording an amended plat making that change, as provided in this section and subject to Subsection (6)(c). (b) The surveyor preparing the amended plat shall certify that the surveyor: (i) holds a license in accordance with Title 58, Chapter 22, Professional Engineers and Professional Land Surveyors Licensing Act; (ii) has completed a survey of the property described on the plat in accordance with Section 17-23-17 and has verified all measurements; and (iii) has placed monuments as represented on the plat. (c) An owner of land may not submit for recording an amended plat that gives the subdivision described in the amended plat the same name as a subdivision in a plat already recorded in the county recorder's office. (d) Except as provided in Subsection (6)(a), the recording of a declaration or other document that purports to change the name of a recorded plat is void. Amended by Chapter 384, 2019 General Session Page 2 < j 1.-4:k - •,.ter C �. r . i'v' - . f iiiiiret V1908h •sisaimisiset .. _t t3 L'rssI 5IG�a--�-i-ligUACtinsalldladik- - 1 WS PM�� CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF Ordinance 2021-12 September 28, 2021 An Ordinance Amending the Text of the Moab Municipal Code (MMC) to Add Regulation for Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries by Amending Sections 17.06 Definitions, 17.21.020 C-2 Commercial Residential Zone, 17.24.020 C-3 Central Commercial Zone, 17.27.020 C-4 General Commercial Zone, 17.31.020 RC Resort Commercial Zone and 17.36.020 Industrial Zone To: City Council From: Nora Shepard, Planning Director Date: September 28, 2021 Subject: Proposed Code Text Amendments to allow Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries Background The Moab Municipal Code (MMC) currently does not address Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries. The City Council requested that the Planning Commission consider forwarding amendments to Chapter 17 of the MMC to allow Brewpub in the C-3 Central Commercial Zone. The staff and Planning Commission discussed the topic at several work session and a public hearing was held on August 12, 2021. There were no public comments. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation on the proposed Ordinance 2021-12. In addition to addressing Brewpubs in the C-3, the proposed code amendments also address breweries and distillerie s. Proposed Amendments 1. Add definitions to 17.06 for Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries as follows: BREWPUB: A restaurant type establishment that also contains a small brewery, where the product is brewed primarily for sale in the associated restaurant. Brewpubs may package their product in kegs, bottles or cans for on site or off- site distribution. The alcohol to food sales revenue ratio for a brewpub shall comply with the requirements of chapter 6 (Specific Retail License Act) of title 32B (Utah Alcoholic Beverage Control Act) of the Utah Code, or its successor. BREWERY: A business establishment that manufactures more than fifteen thousand (15,000) barrels of beer, heavy beer, or malt liquor as otherwise defined and regulated in title 32B, Utah code, as amended. MICROBREWERY: A brewery that produces less than fifteen thousand (15,000) barrels of beer, heavy beer, or malt liquor annually and occupies less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet in gross floor area and may include a taproom in which guests/customers may sample the product. MICRODISTILLERY shall mean a facility that produces no more than fifteen thousand (15,000) gallons per year of spirituous beverages on site and shall include a tasting room in which guests/customers may sample the product. 2. Add Brewpubs as permitted uses in the C-2 Commercial-Residential and C-3 Central Commercial, C-4 General Commercial and RC Resort Commercial Zones. 3. Add Microbreweries, Breweries and Micro Distilleries as a permitted use in the C- 4 General Commercial Zone and I Industrial Zones. 4. Add Breweries as a permitted use in the I Industrial Zone A draft of Ordinance 2012-12, as recommended by the Planning Commission is attached as Exhibit for your review. Criteria for Code Text Amendments Section 17.04. 070 of the Moab Municipal Code requires that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the following criteria: A. Is the proposed use substantially similar to other authorized uses permitted within the subject zoning district? B. Is the proposed use a relatively new use type or development concept that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City’s General Plan? C. Is the amendment consistent with the policies and goals of the General Plan? D. Will the amendment create significant adverse impacts upon neighboring properties within or adjacent to the zoning districts which would be affected by the change? E. Is it in the public interest to approve the proposed amendment? F. Is the amendment likely to lead to a positive redevelopment of a specific area or zone? G. Will the amendment provide a variety of options for residents in terms of economic development, affordable housing, or other benefits? H. Is the amendment appropriate considering the existing conditions in the zoning district, the established relationships between zoning districts, existing land uses and densities, and the scale of both existing and proposed development? Items for Discussion The Code amendments are straightforward. The Planning Commission discussed whether or not to allow Brewpubs in the C-5 Neighborhood Commercial Zone. The draft does not include allowing brewpubs in the C-5. Brewpubs are generally larger uses which may not be compatible in the C-5 Neighborhood Residential Zone. The impacts from a brewpub use are likely to be incompatible with the surrounding r esidential neighborhoods. CITY OF MOAB, UTAH ORDINANCE NO. 2021-12 An Ordinance Amending the Text of the Moab Municipal Code (MMC) to Add Regulation for Brewpubs, Breweries and Distilleries by Amending Sections 17.06 Definitions, 17.21.020 C-2 Commercial Residential Zone, 17.24.020 C-3 Central Commercial Zone, 17.27.020 C-4 General Commercial Zone, 17.31.020 RC Resort Commercial Zone and 17.36.020 Industrial Zone WHEREAS, the City has enacted Title 17 Zoning, of the Moab Municipal Code (‘MMC”) that governs land use and development within the City Limits. WHEREAS, from time to time the City undertakes revisions of Title 17.00 to improve the quality of land development and align the Code with state law and contemporary planning concepts. WHEREAS, the City finds that this Ordinance will serve the public health, safety, and welfare, and that adoption is in the best interests of the Moab community. WHEREAS, Title 17.00 of the MMC does not address Brewpubs, Breweries or Distilleries. WHEREAS, Brewpubs are a compatible use in the C-2, C-3, and C-4 zones, but Breweries and Distilleries are most appropriate in the C-4 and I Zones WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has discussed and reviewed the proposed ordinance revisions on numerous occasions and has provided valuable input. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 12, 2021 after meeting the public hearing notice requirement of the MMC. WHEREAS, after the public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the ordinance and public input and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council on August 12, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED that the Moab City Council hereby approves Text Amendments to the MMC as follows: Section 1: Add the following definitions to 17.06 Definitions BREWPUB: A restaurant type establishment that also contains a small brewery, where the product is brewed primarily for sale in the associated restaurant. Brewpubs may package their product in kegs, bottles or cans for on site or off site distribution. The alcohol to food sales revenue ratio for a brewpub shall comply with the requirements of chapter 6 (Specific Retail License Act) of title 32B (Utah Alcoholic Beverage Control Act) of the Utah Code, or its successor. BREWERY: A business establishment that manufactures more than fifteen thousand (15,000) barrels of beer, heavy beer, or malt liquor as otherwise defined and regulated in title 32B, Utah code, as amended. MICROBREWERY: A brewery that produces less than fifteen thousand (15,000) barrels of beer, heavy beer, or malt liquor annually and occupies less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet in gross floor area and may include a taproom in which guests/customers may sample the product. DISTILLERY shall mean a facility that produces no more than fifteen thousand (15,000) gallons per year of spirituous beverages on site and shall include a tasting room in which guests/customers may sample the product. Section 2. Add Brewpubs as permitted uses in 17.21.020 C-2 Commercial-Residential, 17.24.020 C-3 Central Commercial, 17.27.020 C-4 General Commercial and 17.31.020 RC Resort Commercial Zones. Section 3: Add microbreweries and Distilleries as a permitted use to 17.27.020 C-4 General Commercial Zone and 17.36.020 I Industrial Zone. Section 4: Add Breweries as a permitted uses to 17.36.020 I Industrial Zone. PASSED by the City Council in a public meeting on _____________ by the following vote: MOAB CITY COUNCIL: Those voting aye:_____________________________________ Those voting nay:____________________________________ Those abstaining: ___________________________________ Those absent:_______________________________________ _________________________ Emily Niehaus, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Sommar Johnson, Clerk/Recorder Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Title: Purchasing Policy – Legal Service Contract Presenter: Ben Billingsley Attachment(s): - Ordinance -17-2021 Amending Purchasing Procedures - Purchasing Policy Amendment redline Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance 17-2021 amending the City Purchasing Policy to allow an exception for legal service contracts. Background/Summary: This ordinance proposes an additional exception to the City’s procurement policy for the City Manager to approve legal service contractor agreements without the requirement of the bid process. Most municipal procurement policies have accommodations for professional services contracts. This enables the city to act quickly without going through the formal bid and award process services. This proposal policy does not override budgetary spending authority. 1 CITY OF MOAB ORDINANCE #2021-17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 2 CHAPTER 28 PURCHASING PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the City has adopted Title 2 Chapter 28 of the Moab Municipal Code, which establishes the purchasing procedures for the City; and, WHEREAS, the Moab City Council finds that including contracts for legal services as an exception to the purchasing procedures allows for the quality of services serve as the primary basis for contract award, as well as allowing the city to respond quickly to emerging situations. NOW THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby ordains that Title 2 Chapter 28, Purchasing Procedures be amended to include the following: 2.28.110 Procurement exceptions Legal Service Contracts. Contracts for legal services may be awarded at the discretion of the City Manager without using the competitive sealed bids process. Legal service contracts shall be awarded based on professional qualifications, experience, and ability to meet the City’s specific service requirements, cost of service, and other criteria deemed important by the City Manager. PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City of Moab City Council. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. SIGNED: Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Date ATTEST: Sommar Johnson, Recorder 2.28.110 Procurement exceptions | Moab Municipal Code Page 1 of 2 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 21-14, passed July 13, 2021. 2.28.110 Procurement exceptions. The following procurement exceptions are authorized by this chapter: A. Emergencies. Where there is an emergency situation involving a threat to public health, welfare, or safety, including, but not limited to, essential public works such as the wastewater treatment system, culinary water system, stormwater system, or the like, the purchasing agent, in consultation with the City Manager, may waive the procurement rules specified by this chapter. The purchasing agent shall report the emergency procurement exception to the City Council no later than thirty days from the date of the procurement. The purchasing agent shall assure that the terms of the procurement are as competitive and favorable as the circumstances will allow. When the emergency has passed all further procurement shall be conducted in conformity with the other procedures of this chapter. 1. City department heads should seek to obtain competitive emergency purchases by using telephone quotes, internet or catalog quotes, limited invitations to bid, or similar procedures to the extent practicable, and consistent with the need to protect public health and safety. 2. The purchasing agent and City Manager shall make a written determination documenting the emergency and the selection of the procurement item. A record of the determination and selection shall be kept in the contract file. The documentation may be made after the emergency condition has passed. B. State Approved Contracts. Pursuant to Section 11-13-201, Utah Code Annotated 1953, the City is authorized to enter into joint purchasing arrangements with other governmental entities. Where the state of Utah or other competitive purchasing groups have established standard procurement contracts for state agencies which are available to local governments, the City is not required to engage in a different procurement process, and may purchase goods, services, equipment, or the like pursuant to the published price schedules, catalog prices, or specified terms established by the state or the competitive purchasing group. City departments are encouraged to utilize state of Utah competitive purchasing group procurements where appropriate. The purchasing agent must approve the purchase order in advance and, if it exceeds the sum of one hundred thousand dollars, the purchase is subject to City Council review and approval. C. Single Source Procurement. Where there is only a single source available for a particular procurement, the purchasing agent may waive proposal or bid requirements; provided, that the department head undertakes reasonable efforts to: (1) document that no alternative provider is available; and (2) secure the most advantageous terms for the City. The purchasing agent must approve the purchase order in advance and, if it exceeds the sum of fifty thousand dollars, the purchase is subject to City Council review and approval. 1. Sole-source procurement awards do not involve standard procurement process and should only be used when justified after reasonable research has been conducted to determine if there are other available sources, and an analysis has been done to determine if a sole-source award is cost-justified. 2. Circumstances for which a sole-source contract awards may be justified include: 2.28.110 Procurement exceptions | Moab Municipal Code Page 2 of 2 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 21-14, passed July 13, 2021. a. A procurement item for which there is no comparable product or service, such as a one-of-a-kind item available from only one vendor; b. A component or replacement part for which there is no commercially available substitute, and which can only be obtained directly from the manufacturer; or c. An exclusive maintenance, service, or warranty agreement. 3. Prior to awarding a sole-source contract, the applicable department shall conduct a price analysis to determine if the same or similar items are available from another source. 4. An urgent or unexpected circumstance for a procurement does not justify the ward of a contract using the sole-source exception. D. Exclusions. The following contracts or transactions are excluded from the procurement provisions of this chapter: contracts for the purchase/sale of an interest in real estate; employment contracts; contract change orders or modifications; intergovernmental agreements; grant or similar agreements where the City serves as a funding conduit to a third party; nonemployee statutory appointee contracts; utility, franchise, or public right- of-way agreements; extensions of existing contracts; and agreements with interlocal co-op entities (e.g., local government mutual insurance agencies). E. Alternative Procurement Processes. The City Council may authorize other or alternative procurement procedures on a case-by-case basis upon a showing of good cause. (Ord. 18-03 (part), 2018) F. Legal Service Contracts. Contracts for legal services may be awarded at the discretion of the City Manager without using the competitive sealed bids process. Legal service contracts shall be awarded based on professional qualifications, experience, and ability to meet the City’s specific service requirements, cost of service, and other criteria deemed important by the City Manager. The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 21-14, passed July 13, 2021. Disclaimer: The City Recorder's Office has the official version of the Moab Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Recorder's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. Note: This site does not support Internet Explorer. To view this site, Code Publishing Company recommends using one of the following browsers: Google Chrome, Firefox, or Safari. City Website: moabcity.org City Telephone: (435) 259-5121 Code Publishing Company Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt, Italic Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt