The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutPKT-CC-2022-02-08FEBRUARY 8, 2022 REGULAR MEETING 6:00 P.M. Consistent with provisions of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, Utah Code Ann. § 54 -2 - 207(4), the Moab City Council Chair has issued written determinations supporting the decision to convene electronic meetings of the Council without a physical anchor location. Due to the health and safety risks related to the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic, the Moab City Council will continue to hold meetings by electronic means. The public is invited and encouraged to view and participate in the Council ’s electronic meetings by viewing the City ’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/MoabCityGovernment Regular City Council Meeting - 6:00 p.m. Call to Order and Roll Call Attendance Citizens to Be Heard (Electronic Participation) Citizens to be heard comments may be made by phone or online through Zoom. Citizens are limited to two (2) minutes for comments.To participate by phone or online through Zoom, please use the following links: Dial: 669 -900 -9128 Meeting ID: 882 6951 9075 Passcode (if needed): 492511 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88269519075? pwd=svfjmtrlstfwc05rdnm0mc9ja0dzut09 Please note that when joining the meeting, you will be placed in a waiting room and will be added to the meeting by the moderator. Your comments will be recorded and on YouTube. To have your written comments considered for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the electronic meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/citizenstobeheard . You must submit your comments by 6:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words. Public Hearing: Proposed Resolution 04 -2022 - A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2021 -2022 Budget Public comments may be made by phone or online through Zoom. Citizens are limited to two (2) minutes for comments.To participate by phone or online through Zoom, please use the following links: Dial: 669 -900 -9128 Meeting ID: 882 6951 9075 Passcode (if needed): 492511 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88269519075? pwd=svfjmtrlstfwc05rdnm0mc9ja0dzut09 Please note that when joining the meeting, you will be placed in a waiting room and will be added to the meeting by the moderator. Your comments will be recorded and on YouTube. To have your written comments considered for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the electronic meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/publiccommentform . You must submit your comments by 6:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words . Presentations Kickoff for the Community Visioning Process https://lab2.future -iq.com/moab -tomorrow -together/ agenda summary community vision kickoff.pdf moab -tomorrow together project plan 2022.pdf moab_our_future_logo_final.pdf Consent Agenda Regional Haze Letter to EPA city of moab regional haze letter 2 -1 -2022.pdf regional haze letter agenda summary sheet.docx.pdf regional haze memo - draft nov 2021.pdf Confirmation of the appointment of Jeremy Lynch to the Moab City Planning Commission planning commission appointment agenda summary - jeremy lynch 012522.pdf Confirmation of the appointment of Jill Tatton to the Moab City Planning Commission planning commission appointment agenda summary - jill tatton 012522.pdf Approval of Minutes January 18, 2022, Special Meeting min -cc -2022 -01 -18 draft.pdf January 25, 2022, Regular Meeting min -cc -2022 -01 -25 draft.pdf Old Business Streetlight LED Conversion Plan Discussion. streetlight plan agenda summary 2 -8 -22.docx.pdf Staff Update on R2/R3/R4 Active Employment Household Amendments Briefing and Discussion Discussion of Walnut Lane Redevelopment Alternatives Briefing and possible action agenda summary walnut lane alternatives 2.8.2022.pdf sample homestake mou.pdf sample homestake rfq.pdf New Business Proposed Resolution 04 -2022: A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022 Budget Briefing and possible action agenda summary - resolution 04 -2022 fy22 budget amendment.pdf resolution 04 -2022 fy22 budget amendment.pdf fy22 budget amendment feb22.pdf Administrative Reports Acting City Manager Updates Mayor and Council Reports Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Executive (Closed) Session Strategy Session to Discuss Reasonably Imminent and/or Pending Litigation Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1. 1.1. 2. 3. 4. 4.1. Documents: 5. 5.1. Documents: 5.2. Documents: 5.3. Documents: 5.4. 5.4.a. Documents: 5.4.b. Documents: 6. 6.1. Documents: 6.2. 6.3. Documents: 7. 7.1. Documents: 8. 8.1. 9. 10. 11. 11.1. 12. FEBRUARY 8, 2022 REGULAR MEETING 6:00 P.M.Consistent with provisions of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, Utah Code Ann. § 54 -2 -207(4), the Moab City Council Chair has issued written determinations supporting the decision to convene electronic meetings of the Council without a physical anchor location. Due to the health and safety risks related to the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic, the Moab City Council will continue to hold meetings by electronic means. The public is invited and encouraged to view and participate in the Council ’s electronic meetings by viewing the City ’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/MoabCityGovernmentRegular City Council Meeting - 6:00 p.m. Call to Order and Roll Call AttendanceCitizens to Be Heard (Electronic Participation)Citizens to be heard comments may be made by phone or online through Zoom. Citizens are limited to two (2) minutes for comments.To participate by phone or online through Zoom, please use the following links: Dial: 669 -900 -9128 Meeting ID: 882 6951 9075 Passcode (if needed): 492511 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88269519075?pwd=svfjmtrlstfwc05rdnm0mc9ja0dzut09Please note that when joining the meeting, you will be placed in a waiting room and will be added to the meeting by the moderator. Your comments will be recorded and on YouTube. To have your written comments considered for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the electronic meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/citizenstobeheard . You must submit your comments by 6:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words.Public Hearing: Proposed Resolution 04 -2022 - A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2021 -2022 BudgetPublic comments may be made by phone or online through Zoom. Citizens are limited to two (2) minutes for comments.To participate by phone or online through Zoom, please use the following links: Dial: 669 -900 -9128 Meeting ID: 882 6951 9075 Passcode (if needed): 492511 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88269519075?pwd=svfjmtrlstfwc05rdnm0mc9ja0dzut09Please note that when joining the meeting, you will be placed in a waiting room and will be added to the meeting by the moderator. Your comments will be recorded and on YouTube. To have your written comments considered for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the electronic meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/publiccommentform . You must submit your comments by 6:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words . Presentations Kickoff for the Community Visioning Process https://lab2.future -iq.com/moab -tomorrow -together/ agenda summary community vision kickoff.pdf moab -tomorrow together project plan 2022.pdf moab_our_future_logo_final.pdf Consent Agenda Regional Haze Letter to EPA city of moab regional haze letter 2 -1 -2022.pdf regional haze letter agenda summary sheet.docx.pdf regional haze memo - draft nov 2021.pdf Confirmation of the appointment of Jeremy Lynch to the Moab City Planning Commission planning commission appointment agenda summary - jeremy lynch 012522.pdf Confirmation of the appointment of Jill Tatton to the Moab City Planning Commission planning commission appointment agenda summary - jill tatton 012522.pdf Approval of Minutes January 18, 2022, Special Meeting min -cc -2022 -01 -18 draft.pdf January 25, 2022, Regular Meeting min -cc -2022 -01 -25 draft.pdf Old Business Streetlight LED Conversion Plan Discussion. streetlight plan agenda summary 2 -8 -22.docx.pdf Staff Update on R2/R3/R4 Active Employment Household Amendments Briefing and Discussion Discussion of Walnut Lane Redevelopment Alternatives Briefing and possible action agenda summary walnut lane alternatives 2.8.2022.pdf sample homestake mou.pdf sample homestake rfq.pdf New Business Proposed Resolution 04 -2022: A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022 Budget Briefing and possible action agenda summary - resolution 04 -2022 fy22 budget amendment.pdf resolution 04 -2022 fy22 budget amendment.pdf fy22 budget amendment feb22.pdf Administrative Reports Acting City Manager Updates Mayor and Council Reports Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Executive (Closed) Session Strategy Session to Discuss Reasonably Imminent and/or Pending Litigation Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1.1.1.2.3. 4. 4.1. Documents: 5. 5.1. Documents: 5.2. Documents: 5.3. Documents: 5.4. 5.4.a. Documents: 5.4.b. Documents: 6. 6.1. Documents: 6.2. 6.3. Documents: 7. 7.1. Documents: 8. 8.1. 9. 10. 11. 11.1. 12. FEBRUARY 8, 2022 REGULAR MEETING 6:00 P.M.Consistent with provisions of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, Utah Code Ann. § 54 -2 -207(4), the Moab City Council Chair has issued written determinations supporting the decision to convene electronic meetings of the Council without a physical anchor location. Due to the health and safety risks related to the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic, the Moab City Council will continue to hold meetings by electronic means. The public is invited and encouraged to view and participate in the Council ’s electronic meetings by viewing the City ’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/MoabCityGovernmentRegular City Council Meeting - 6:00 p.m. Call to Order and Roll Call AttendanceCitizens to Be Heard (Electronic Participation)Citizens to be heard comments may be made by phone or online through Zoom. Citizens are limited to two (2) minutes for comments.To participate by phone or online through Zoom, please use the following links: Dial: 669 -900 -9128 Meeting ID: 882 6951 9075 Passcode (if needed): 492511 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88269519075?pwd=svfjmtrlstfwc05rdnm0mc9ja0dzut09Please note that when joining the meeting, you will be placed in a waiting room and will be added to the meeting by the moderator. Your comments will be recorded and on YouTube. To have your written comments considered for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the electronic meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/citizenstobeheard . You must submit your comments by 6:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words.Public Hearing: Proposed Resolution 04 -2022 - A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2021 -2022 BudgetPublic comments may be made by phone or online through Zoom. Citizens are limited to two (2) minutes for comments.To participate by phone or online through Zoom, please use the following links: Dial: 669 -900 -9128 Meeting ID: 882 6951 9075 Passcode (if needed): 492511 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88269519075?pwd=svfjmtrlstfwc05rdnm0mc9ja0dzut09Please note that when joining the meeting, you will be placed in a waiting room and will be added to the meeting by the moderator. Your comments will be recorded and on YouTube. To have your written comments considered for the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the electronic meeting, please fill out the form found here: https://bit.ly/publiccommentform . You must submit your comments by 6:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please limit your comments to 400 words .PresentationsKickoff for the Community Visioning Processhttps://lab2.future -iq.com/moab -tomorrow -together/agenda summary community vision kickoff.pdfmoab-tomorrow together project plan 2022.pdfmoab_our_future_logo_final.pdfConsent AgendaRegional Haze Letter to EPAcity of moab regional haze letter 2 -1 -2022.pdfregional haze letter agenda summary sheet.docx.pdfregional haze memo - draft nov 2021.pdfConfirmation of the appointment of Jeremy Lynch to the Moab City Planning Commission planning commission appointment agenda summary - jeremy lynch 012522.pdfConfirmation of the appointment of Jill Tatton to the Moab City Planning Commission planning commission appointment agenda summary - jill tatton 012522.pdfApproval of MinutesJanuary 18, 2022, Special Meetingmin-cc -2022 -01 -18 draft.pdfJanuary 25, 2022, Regular Meetingmin-cc -2022 -01 -25 draft.pdfOld BusinessStreetlight LED Conversion PlanDiscussion. streetlight plan agenda summary 2 -8 -22.docx.pdf Staff Update on R2/R3/R4 Active Employment Household Amendments Briefing and Discussion Discussion of Walnut Lane Redevelopment Alternatives Briefing and possible action agenda summary walnut lane alternatives 2.8.2022.pdf sample homestake mou.pdf sample homestake rfq.pdf New Business Proposed Resolution 04 -2022: A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022 Budget Briefing and possible action agenda summary - resolution 04 -2022 fy22 budget amendment.pdf resolution 04 -2022 fy22 budget amendment.pdf fy22 budget amendment feb22.pdf Administrative Reports Acting City Manager Updates Mayor and Council Reports Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Executive (Closed) Session Strategy Session to Discuss Reasonably Imminent and/or Pending Litigation Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1.1.1.2.3.4.4.1.Documents:5.5.1.Documents:5.2.Documents:5.3.Documents:5.4.5.4.a.Documents:5.4.b.Documents:6.6.1.Documents: 6.2. 6.3. Documents: 7. 7.1. Documents: 8. 8.1. 9. 10. 11. 11.1. 12. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: February 8, 2022 Title: Kickoff for the Community Visioning Process Date Submitted: February 2, 2022 Staff Presenter: Carly Castle, Acting City Manager David Beurle, Future iQ Celine Beurle, Future iQ Attachment(s): o Moab – Tomorrow Together Project Plan/Timeline o Moab – Tomorrow Together Logo o Moab – Tomorrow Together Portal link Options: Presentation and discussion Recommended Motion: N/A Background/Summary: David Beurle will give a brief summary of Future iQ before presenting the work carried out to date for the Moab Community Visioning process. This process will be known as “Moab – Tomorrow Together’ after consultation with the City of Moab Communication and Engagement Manager. A relatable logo has been created for the project as well as a portal/website. This portal/website will be the ‘go to’ place for everything relating to the project. David will present the methodological approach that Future iQ is taking before outlining the program schematic from January through October 2022. David will go through the weekly project plan and timeline before discussing ‘next steps’ for February and March. The next steps will include the extensive community survey and organization of the Think-Tank workshop which will be held on 6/7 April. Moab - Tomorrow Together DRAFT Project Plan (Jan-June) Phase 1: Taks Key Tasks 17-Jan 24-Jan 31-Jan 7-Feb 14-Feb 21-Feb 28-Feb 7-Mar 14-Mar 21-Mar 28-Mar 4-Apr 11-Apr 18-Apr 25-Apr 2-May 9-May 16-May 23-May 30-May 6-Jun 13-Jun 20-Jun Future iQ onsite Future iQ Team onsite Weekly calls between FiQ and Carly Castle and intermittant meetings with Moab Project Team (Project Team - Task 1: Development of Project Plan Initial Planning, meetings and schedule (Completed) FiQ produces Project Portal (Completed) FiQ produces Project Plan/Timeline (Completed) Project Team is set up (Completed) Deadline for Moab Council Meeting Packet/Docs - 3 Feb FiQ presents at Moab Council Meeting - 7 Feb FiQ produces Engagement/Communication Plan FiQ submits Task 1 Invoice Task 2: Implementation Background Interviews FiQ schedules background interviews with council/staff and others FiQ conducts interviews with council/staff and others FiQ produces videos and SM jpegs for portal/SM Community Survey FiQ produces Draft Community Survey Project Team approves final draft Community Survey FiQ produces Spanish version of Community Survey Community Survey onto Portal and link distributed Community Survey runs to 18 March (TBC) FiQ prepares Data Visualization of Community Survey Think-Tank FiQ produces Save the Date, Agenda and Application form for Think-Tank Project team approves Agenda and Application form Project team creates Think-Tank Interview list Project Team sends out Save the Date Project Team sends out Think-Tank Invitation/Agenda Project Team organizes catering/refreshments FiQ finalizes Think-Tank materials/handouts FiQ produces Spanish translation of materials/handouts Project Team prints Think-Tank materials/handouts Think-Tank workshop is held - 6/7 April FiQ produces Think-Tank Report Vision Survey FiQ produces Vision Survey (including Spanish version) Project Team approves Vision Survey Vision Survey runs to 10 June TBC FiQ prepares Data Visualization of Vision Survey Discussion Boards Online discussion boards run on the portal though to July Community Vision Workshops Project Team organize workshop times and venues FiQ produce workshop materials and translations Vision Workshops run (incl Spanish/Youth) - Wk of 6 June Moab - Tomorrow Together DRAFT Project Plan (July - Oct) Phase 1: Task 2 Key Tasks 4-Jul 11-Jul 18-Jul 25-Jul 1-Aug 8-Aug 15-Aug 22-Aug 29-Aug 5-Sep 12-Sep 19-Sep 26-Sep 3-Oct 10-Oct 17-Oct 24-Oct 31-Oct Future iQ onsite Future iQ Team onsite Weekly calls between FiQ and Carly Castle and intermittant meetings with Moab Project Team (Project T )Future Summit Project Team organize Future Summit venue Organization of Future Summit (Format/Agenda/Rapid Polling/Presentation Future Summit held - week of 12 September FiQ submits Task 2 Invoice Phase 2: Task 1 Synthesize Results and Focus Groups FiQ produce focus group topics and produce materials for focus groups (translated) Project Team invite individuals to join focus groups Focus Groups run wk of 8 Aug and 12 Sept City of Moab Vision and Strategic Action Plan FiQ draft and finalize report with input from Project Team/Council FiQ submits Task 1 Invoice Phase 2: Task 2 Vision Presentation FiQ presents Community Vision and Strategic Action Plan to Council/Staff/Community FiQ submits Task 2 Invoice To: KC Becker, Region 8 Administrator, EPA From:City of Moab Subject:Clean Air Act Regional Haze Program Date:February 8, 2022 The City of Moab requests the EPA require the Hunter and Huntington coal power plants to comply with emissions reductions consistent with the best-available retrofit technology determined by the 2016 Federal Implementation Plan as per the Clean Air Act’s Regional Haze Program Round 1 requirements. This plan would cut haze-causing nitrogen-oxide emissions by 76% from Utah’s two major coal plants, and would support the Biden administration’s stated interests in climate change action and clean energy development, and in addition to cleaning up the air for our community, our visitors, and our national parks. Moab is the gateway community to Arches and Canyonlands National Parks, in addition to miles of world-renowned trails providing recreation opportunities for over three million national and international visitors per year. We have unparalleled desert vistas which are a national treasure. The eye can only see as far as the air is clear, however, and haze from air pollution has detrimental effects on not only the views, but our community’s health and safety as well. There is an opportunity already in place to prevent a majority of this air pollution, the EPA only needs to support it. The 2016 Federal Implementation Plan lays out a cost-effective route to decrease pollution from the two large coal plants in our region, and over 106,600 people have already submitted comments in support of pollution controls as per this plan. The City of Moab supports the enforcement of the Clean Air Act’s provisions and the installation of nitrogen oxide pollution controls on the Hunter and Huntington coal plants to protect our clean air. The Regional Haze Program is designed to return our national parks to natural visibility by 2064. If coal-powered air pollution is allowed to continue unabated, this goal will never be met. Pacificorp’s 2021 Integrated Resource Plan states that they plan to keep the Huntington plant open until 2036 and the Hunter plant burning until 2042. This is 14 and 20 years, respectively, of haze-causing air pollution that could be avoided with the implementation of the 2016 FIP requirements. Our city was proud to host Region 8 Administrator Sean McGrath in 2015, as the EPA deliberated the initial Utah round 1 FIP designation. We would like to invite the current Region 8 Administrator, KC Becker, to visit and listen to the concerns of our community, as this issue deserves careful consideration. Our City’s economic and public health depend on clean air and clear skies. The EPA has the opportunity to keep them that way. Sincerely, _________________________________ Joette Langianese, Mayor Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: February 8, 2022 Title:Regional Haze Letter to EPA Presenter:Mila Dunbar-Irwin, Sustainability Director Attachment(s):Draft letter, Sierra Club memo Recommended Motion:I move to approve the letter to EPA Administrator of Region 8 in support of pollution controls on power plants in Utah via the Regional Haze Program of the Clean Air Act. Background/Summary:There are two remaining large coal-fired power plants in Utah - Hunter and Huntington - which are required to comply with clean air regulations. Part of these regulations are in regards to haze-producing pollutants in national parks. This aspect of the Clean Air Act is called “Regional Haze.” In 2016, Moab played a pivotal role in engaging the EPA and producing a strong haze rule, which was incorporated into the Federal Implementation Plan for pollution control at both plants in 2016. This plan was never adopted and implemented, due to rule rollbacks after the federal administration changed. With the new administration, and new Region 8 EPA Administrator, KC Becker, there is an opportunity to engage the EPA anew and encourage them to reinstate the pollution-control requirements from 2016, which would reduce haze-causing pollutants by 76% from Hunter and Huntington power plants. Retrofit technology has only become more available, and the parks continue to be impacted by anthropogenic haze. The intention of this letter is to voice support at the local level for Regional Haze controls and introduce Moab to the new EPA administrator. The climate change and clean energy goals of the current administration align well with pollution-controls, and the Hunter and Huntington plants directly impact our region’s skies. Enforcing the regulations agreed upon in 2016 would benefit the health and economy of Moab and our neighboring communities. MEMO TO:White House Climate Policy Office FROM:Sierra Club and National Parks Conservation Association SUBJECT:Action on Regional Haze Will Deliver Significant Climate and Health Co-benefits DATE:December 7, 2021 ==================================================================== This memo discusses actions necessary from the administration to reduce haze-causing pollution from coal-fired plants under the Regional Haze Rule. Significant opportunities exist to codify emission reductions under both the outstanding round 1 plans for five states as well round 2 plans that are currently in process for all states around the nation. Final Regional Haze action is required now on outstanding round 1 plans. Significant emissions reductions can be secured that would not otherwise be achieved under any other existing rulemaking. The 1990 Clean Air Act amendments require states and EPA to remedy the degraded visibility caused by human-made air pollution -- primarily sulfur dioxide (“SO2”), nitrogen oxide (“NOx”), and particulate matter from industrial sources -- at treasured national parks and wilderness areas designated as “Class I” areas. EPA subsequently issued the Regional Haze Rule, which required states to submit state implementation plans by 2007, and then every 10 years after. The plans outline compliance schedules and measures, and emissions limits for polluting facilities that will make reasonable progress toward the goal of correcting visibility issues in Class I areas. The first round of plans required the oldest and dirtiest polluters to install the best available retrofit technology, or “BART”, to reduce pollution from some of the worst offenders. More than 13 years later, several states’ plans have yet to fully comply with round 1 BART requirements. In June 2021, Sierra Club and National Parks Conservation Association along with four other conservation organizations submitted a request1 to EPA Administrator Michael Regan highlighting the need for complete and rigorous implementation of BART requirements, highlighting a range of state plan deficiencies or a lack of final action state implementation plans for Texas, Utah, Wyoming, Nebraska and Pennsylvania. 1 The coal units described in this letter (excluding those with firm retirement dates) are: Gerald Gentleman 1-2 (NE), Hunter 1-3 (UT), Huntington 1-2 (UT), Jim Bridger 1-2 (WY), Limestone 1-2 (TX), Martin Lake 1-3 (TX), Naughton 1-2 (WY), Tolk 1-2 (TX), WA Parish 5-6 (TX), Wyodak 1 (WY). Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund, Powder River Basin Resource Council, Earthjustice, National Parks Conservation Association and HEAL Utah, “Re: Regional Haze: Outstanding Obligations from the First Planning Period,” Letter to EPA Administrator Regan, June 8, 2021. 1 Full compliance with the BART program and final round 1 actions will lead to long overdue, significant improvement to air quality and visibility in places like (but not limited to) Big Bend, Zion, Grand Canyon, Bryce Canyon, Arches, Rocky Mountain and Shenandoah National Parks. In addition, this action will have substantial co-benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving public health. This memo highlights these important co-benefits and the need for prompt action by EPA. Climate and health impacts of coal plants subject to Regional Haze action The Conservation Organizations’ letter highlighted 21 units at coal-fired power plants2 in these five states which would be required to make significant capital expenditures in pollution controls like selective catalytic reduction (“SCR”) or flue gas desulfurization (“FGD”) to meet BART requirements at aging, polluting coal plants. Many of these plants, however, are expensive to continue operating and increasingly uneconomic relative to renewable energy like wind and solar, energy storage, and customer energy efficiency programs that avoid the need for expensive power plants. While modern pollution controls would reduce air pollution from these plants, in many cases it is more cost effective to simply replace these polluting power plants with clean energy resources. These 21 coal units consist of 12,579 MW of generating capacity. In 2019, they collectively emitted 63 million metric tons of CO2, nearly 4% of total U.S. electric sector emissions. While modern air pollution controls on their own may not reduce this climate pollution, many of these units are already uneconomic, and additional capital expenditures on aging and expensive power plants may not be economically rational in the face of lower cost clean energy options. The 21 coal units described in this letter collectively emitted 233 million pounds of SO2 and 112 million pounds of NOx in 2019. This includes some of the largest sources of pollution in the country. For example, the Martin Lake power plant in Texas was the single largest source of SO2 emissions nationwide in the power sector in 2019, and was also the 7th largest power sector source of NOx pollution. W.A. Parish, outside of Houston, Texas was the third largest source of SO2 in the U.S. power sector in 2019, polluting communities that are already burdened with particulate matter pollution worse than three-quarters of the country. Gerald Gentleman in Nebraska was the 5th largest SO2 emitter in the power sector in 2019. The Hunter power plant in Utah is 5th in the nation for NOx pollution, and due to its proximity to several iconic national parks, is the second largest contributor to pollution in national parks.3 3 NPCA, as referenced in Sierra Club et al letter to EPA Administrator Regan. 2 These totals exclude four Texas electricity generating units that have proposed retirement / gas conversion dates, as well as two cement plants in Pennsylvania which are identified in the letter for which the state implementation plan has significant deficiencies. 2 Reducing SO2 and NOx emissions from these coal units to the level of plants with modern, fully functional pollution controls would reduce NOx emissions by 41 million pounds and SO2 by 180 million pounds.4 Shuttering these plants and replacing the electricity and grid services with clean energy resources could eliminate this pollution altogether. The air pollution from these coal units does not just impair visibility in national parks. SO2 and NOx are dangerous pollutants, both directly and through the formation of particulate matter and ozone in the atmosphere. The pollution from these 21 coal units contributes to at least 435 premature deaths from air pollution each year. In addition, dirty emissions from these plants contribute to an estimated 5,400 asthma attacks and 173 heart attacks per year.5 Reducing air pollution from these plants will significantly reduce the health burden they place on surrounding communities, many already overburdened by pollution, and regions. Replacing these coal plants with clean energy will drive over $45 billion in clean energy investment and deliver jobs These aging coal plants are increasingly uneconomic compared to renewable energy resources, which have seen significant and sustained cost reductions in recent years. In many cases, clean energy portfolios that provide the same electricity output and capacity value as a coal plant may be less costly than the cost of necessary retrofits and continued operations of those coal plants. In fact, our preliminary, internal analyses indicate that for most of the coal units at issue, retiring and replacing these plants with clean energy resources would lower costs and emissions, relative to investing additional capital in these aging and already expensive fossil generation resources. Finally, replacing the 21 coal units with cost-saving portfolios of clean energy resources would result in over $45 billion in investment, including approximately 22 GW of solar, 10 GW of wind, and 11 GW of energy storage. These investments can deliver economic benefits to rural communities6, including local tax revenues, income for landholders, and an estimated 300,000 cumulative job-years over a 15 year time horizon.7 These much needed economic development benefits will support communities as they transition away from coal. 7 Calculation based on average job-years per MW and investment per MW for solar, wind and storage from the UC Berkeley, Energy Innovation and Gridlab “2035 Report”. 6 For more on the rural economic development benefits of renewable energy projects, see RMI, “Seeds of Opportunity”, 2021, https://rmi.org/insight/seeds-of-opportunity/ 5 Based on analysis of 2019 emissions data by Clean Air Task Force, published at https://www.tollfromcoal.org/#/map/(title:none//detail:none//map:none/US).Pro-rated from plant-level to unit-level proportionally using total NOx and SO2 emissions. 4 Based on 2019 NOx and SO2 emissions rates per MMBtu. Assuming fully controlled units have a NOx emissions rate of 0.05 lbs/MMBtu and SO2 emissions rate of 0.06 lbs/MMBtu, and that units in Texas and Nebraska control SO2 emissions while plants in Utah and Wyoming control NOx emissions. 3 Public Engagement Public engagement on regional haze has been robust and longstanding. Since 2016, Sierra Club members and supporters have submitted more than 108,000 individual comments to state and federal agencies requesting stronger NOx pollution controls be installed on the coal plants listed in this memo. The National Parks Conservation Association has extensively worked on and led regional haze advocacy to engage tens of thousands of residents calling for strong action to address Utah’s haze pollution since the beginning of Round 1 planning. Together, our groups formed a coalition of more than 200 businesses from Utah, Colorado, and Arizona that raised their voices to decry the effects of uncontrolled NOx emissions from regional sources, like Hunter and Huntington, and called on EPA to ensure pollution reduction. In 2015, the National Park Service, including Superintendents from Arches, Canyonlands, Zion, Bryce Canyon and Capitol Reef National Parks, identified these coal plants as the largest contributors to visibility impairment in regional Class I areas and called on EPA to require NOx reductions. Over the years, local municipal and county elected officials from National Park gateway communities have made personal appeals to EPA leadership to require pollution controls and clean up the skies and views their communities rely on for economic development. As recent as last month, a County Commissioner in Utah renewed those calls8. And still, these coal plants remain uncontrolled. Recommendations The Regional Haze Rule’s BART requirement for Texas, Utah, Wyoming, Nebraska, and Pennsylvania is nearly fifteen years overdue. Because those states have refused to comply with the Clean Air Act’s mandate, EPA must finally complete the BART process from the first planning period and put these important obligations to rest. In our letter, we proposed a nationwide rulemaking to be completed as expeditiously as possible that would fully correct all deficiencies and satisfy the remaining first round regional haze obligations in the five states. We are also open to other options that would quickly achieve the same goal. Either way,EPA must finally ensure that all states have fully complied with the Clean Air Act’s Regional Haze Rule’s BART requirements for the first round and require emission reductions to achieve reasonable progress towards the national goal of restoring natural visibility to America’s treasured Class I national parks and wilderness areas. The actions of the Biden Administration on these five outstanding state regional haze requirements are of consequence even beyond the sharp reductions they must produce. With 8 “Sarah Stock: Regional Haze Rule is important for our community and must be enforced to do the most good,” Salt Lake Tribune, October 21, 2021. https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2021/10/21/sarah-stock-regional-haze/ 4 all state regional haze plans in the midst of the planning and implementation process for the second round, actions on these outstanding obligations will inform the Administration’s regard and approach for standards to ensure reasonable progress for emission reductions in all states. EPA, in its July 2021 Clarification Memo on Regional Haze made plain that it expects states' haze plans for the second planning period to result in meaningful, additive reductions in SO2 and NOx pollution by 2028. Thousands upon thousands of tons of haze pollution remain unchecked at facilities of all kinds, and at coal-fired power plants in particular. We urge the Biden Administration to act swiftly on our request to resolve the five state round 1 BART obligations once and for all and send a clear signal to all states that the agency is taking the mandate of this Clean Air Act program seriously. 5 Appendix: Coal power plants subject to Regional Haze action State Plant Unit Nameplat e Capacity (MW) 2019 Capacity Factor (%) 2019 CO2 (MMT) 2019 SO2 (million lbs) 2019 NOx (million lbs) NE Gerald Gentleman 1 681 67%3.59 20.93 7.76 NE Gerald Gentleman 2 681 73%4.34 25.89 7.19 TX Limestone 1 910 54%3.90 5.08 6.26 TX Limestone 2 957 64%5.06 6.29 8.68 TX Martin Lake 1 793 54%4.06 27.90 6.24 TX Martin Lake 2 793 54%4.00 30.19 6.22 TX Martin Lake 3 793 62%4.54 35.01 6.52 TX Tolk 1 568 24%1.14 5.73 1.98 TX Tolk 2 568 35%1.76 8.72 2.99 TX W A Parish 5 734 50%2.78 16.00 1.88 TX W A Parish 6 734 57%3.60 22.15 2.15 UT Hunter 1 488 72%2.88 2.35 6.38 UT Hunter 2 488 75%2.76 2.34 5.96 UT Hunter 3 496 72%2.82 2.41 8.69 UT Huntington 1 498 71%2.79 2.75 6.03 UT Huntington 2 498 52%2.07 1.54 4.39 WY Jim Bridger 1 578 58%2.75 4.14 5.59 WY Jim Bridger 2 578 61%2.90 4.87 5.38 WY Naughton 1 163 87%1.31 2.21 2.92 WY Naughton 2 218 84%1.56 2.53 3.58 WY Wyodak 1 362 62%2.22 3.50 5.28 Total 12,579 62.83 232.52 112.06 Source: Sierra Club Analysis of EIA and EPA data. Note: Excludes Coleto Creek, Harrington 1-2, Welsh 1 in TX, which have proposed retirement dates. In addition, Conservation Organizations’ letter from June 8, 2021 identifies two cement plants in PA (Lafarge Whitehall and Lehigh Evansville) as facilities with significant deficiencies in the 2019 state BART plan. 6 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: January 25, 2022 Title: Confirmation of the appointment of Jeremy Lynch to the Moab City Planning Commission Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Cory Shurtleff, Planning & Zoning Administrator Attachment(s): N/A Recommended Motion: I move to confirm the appointment of Jeremy Lynch to the Moab City Planning Commission for a full three-year term that ends December 31, 2024 Background/Summary: Jeremy served as a valuable member of the Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board and his willingness to serve on the Moab City Planning Commission is greatly appreciated. With the resignation of two previous Planning Commission appointments, this appointment would reinstate a complete seven-member commission for adequate operation of essential Planning Commission functions. Staff recommends the appointment of Jeremy Lynch. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: January 25, 2022 Title: Confirmation of the appointment of Jill Tatton to the Moab City Planning Commission Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Cory Shurtleff, Planning & Zoning Administrator Attachment(s): N/A Recommended Motion: I move to confirm the appointment of Jill Tatton to the Moab City Planning Commission for a full three-year term that ends December 31, 2024 Background/Summary: Jill has served as the School Principal for Helen M. Knight Elementary since April 2020, previously serving as the Assistant Principal. Jill has worked for the Grand County School District since 2008, originally working as a First-Grade Teacher, then transitioning to Second and Fifth Grade. Jill has dedicated immeasurable service to the Moab community and her interest in participating on the Moab City Planning Commission is greatly appreciated. With the resignation of two previous Planning Commission appointments, this appointment would reinstate a complete seven-member commission for adequate operation of essential Planning Commission functions. Staff recommends the appointment of Jill Tatton. Page 1 of 1 January 18, 2022 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES--DRAFT SPECIAL MEETING January 18, 2022 Moab City Council held a Special Meeting on the above date. Audio is archived at utah.gov/pmn/index.html and video is archived at www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmT6wrcw0q8. Mayor Joette Langianese called the Special Meeting to order at 5:34 p.m. Councilmembers Tawny Knuteson-Boyd, Rani Derasary, Jason Taylor and Luke Wojciechowski attended remotely. City staff participating included Acting City Manager Carly Castle, Finance Director and Acting Deputy Manager Ben Billingsley, Engineer Chuck Williams and Recorder Sommar Johnson. Hotspot Funding Dispersed Parking Project Cody Howick of Civil Science, Inc. introduced conceptual plans. Engineer Williams reminded Council of the funding provided by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for 188 parking stalls in the downtown area to alleviate traffic congestion. Williams stated the total project cost estimate is $5,715,000 with $342,900 set aside for aesthetics; Moab City would be responsible for funding aesthetic treatments over and above the UDOT allowance. He explained the goals of the project, which are to improve streets to gain parking downtown by adding median parking on side streets as well as along Emma Boulevard. He brought up concerns including bicycle safety, utility conflicts, turning lanes and pedestrian safety. Consultant Ann Christiansen described landscape design elements regarding traffic calming, design character, bollards, bulb-outs, street trees and plantings and stormwater treatment. Electrical engineer David Roederer described options for street lighting in the context of the Dark Skies ordinance, pedestrian safety and solar power, as well as cost differentials. Consultant Leah Jamarillo described the public process. Project costs and timeframes were discussed. Councilmember Taylor asked about parking opportunities for oversized vehicles such as trucks pulling trailers. He also brought up Dark Sky compatible streetlights and a desire for solar compatible fixtures. He supported the proposal to complete the Emma Boulevard scope first. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd asked about surface materials and affiliated costs. Councilmember Derasary brought up Moab’s culture of artists and suggested natural and locally sourced landscape materials would be popular. She also mentioned Moab’s sustainability goals and stormwater management issues. She noted the wealth of local expertise regarding plant lists and asked that any historical themes to the aesthetic consider all eras of human history. She mentioned the importance of shade, bicycle safety, enforcement concerns for oversized vehicles, flashing lights for pedestrian crossings and Dark Skies. Councilmember Wojciechowski mentioned the desirability of solar fixtures but acknowledged the cost factor. He stated there was a prevalent sentiment among residents that the character should not aim for a “high end resort town” but rather reflect the eclectic nature of the community. He mentioned the importance of xeriscape and flood management. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd suggested the involvement of Moab ArtTrails for assistance with design elements. Christiansen brought up continuation of existing street light themes. Mayor Langianese brought up public art spaces, involvement of stakeholders, maintenance impacts on City staff and learning about cost differentials for lighting options. Engineer Williams clarified that some of the lighting expense would illuminate median parking due to jaywalking concerns. Construction contingencies and next steps were discussed. Adjournment: Councilmember Derasary moved to adjourn. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. Mayor Langianese adjourned the meeting at 6:51 p.m. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Joette Langianese, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Page 1 of 7 January 25, 2022 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES--DRAFT REGULAR MEETING January 25, 2022 Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date. Consistent with provisions of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, Utah Code Annotated § 52-4-207(5)(a), City Council chambers served as a physical anchor location. Audio is archived at www.utah.gov/pmn and video is archived at www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmPaSpgHcoM. Attendance and Call to Order: Mayor Joette Langianese called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. Councilmembers Tawny Knuteson-Boyd, Rani Derasary, Kalen Jones, Jason Taylor and Luke Wojciechowski attended remotely. City staff participating included Acting City Manager Carly Castle, Finance Director and Acting Deputy Manager Ben Billingsley, Planning Administrator Cory Shurtleff, Parks, Recreation and Trails Director Annie McVay, Planning Administrator Cory Shurtleff, Engineer Chuck Williams, Assistant Engineer Mark Jolissaint and Recorder Sommar Johnson. Attorney Dani Cepernich also joined the meeting remotely. Amendment to Agenda—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to amend the agenda to allow for a discussion with Attorney Cepernich prior to Citizens To Be Heard. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Wojciechowski and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Discussion Regarding Rezone Request and Development Agreement: Attorney Cepernich and Planning Administrator Shurtleff answered questions from Council about a rezone request and development agreement for a project proposed at approximately 398 Kane Creek Road. Councilmember Derasary asked about rules regarding active employment households. She also asked about proposed code revisions regarding active employment households in residential zones. Citizens To Be Heard: Judy Powers spoke about her concerns regarding perceived “spot zoning” for the proposed development at 398 Kane Creek Road. She stated the City is being held hostage and wanted clarification regarding a residency requirement for ownership. She implored Council to wait for the residential density and active employee household ordinance to be adopted. She recommended a much higher requirement for affordable housing units. She stated her concern that implementation would be difficult, nearby roads are not accommodating, and that it appears the City is being forced into approving the development. John Weisheit spoke about a 2007 study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) regarding the effects of climate change on the Colorado River Basin water supply. He stated the NAS was available to help urban governments solve future water situations. He offered his assistance to the City with regard to the impending water crisis. Mike Duncan spoke about the water utility resource management plan. He stated there is high local interest surrounding the topic. He spoke about the City’s ability to acquire surface water rights and briefly described various controversial studies and noted his impression that the local aquifer was currently at safe yield. He said the studies showing this current level of use are contested by the City’s engineer and the Regional Engineer for the Utah Division of Water Rights. Mr. Duncan stated it is the Council’s job to set policy, not staff. He expressed skepticism Page 2 of 7 January 25, 2022 about the outcomes expected of the water utility resource management plan. He said there is finite recharge every year and if he were in a position to make a decision, he would not approve this nebulous proposal. He stated it is not an engineering issue but is a hydrology problem. Written Comments: Lara Derasary submitted written comments, as follows: I have a number of questions regarding the requested rezone and sketch plan for 398 Kane Creek Blvd. 1) How would this parcel qualify for 161 units given a density allowance of 8-10 units per acre in the R-3. 2) What is the intent of the development agreement? The summary mentions that the R-3 requires affordability for a density allowance, but there is no mention of affordability in the Development Agreement. If the intent of the agreement is for the Active Employee Units to be affordable for local workers (which I think it should be), then I think affordability needs to be clearly defined and tied back to zoning in the development agreement. Density does not equal affordability as illustrated by the new town homes on 100 and 200 South. 3) Who will enforce local occupancy and covenants of the AEUs? Thank you for your consideration of my comments. Lisa Carter submitted written comments, as follows: Rezone RA-1 to R-3 request by Blue Bison Development Questions and Concerns: Does the development plan significantly affect or alter the adjoining properties or neighbors (esthetics, traffic, property values and taxes)? Is the area to be rezoned going to have only 161 units built on it or 174? I am assuming that roughly 1/3 or approximately 53 units (of the 161) would be for local workers as deed restricted rentals? Meanwhile the other 108 can be sold for market value of 400-635K(?) and be made up entirely of second homeowners who can rent them out for a minimum of 30 days? I guess it is better than zero “affordable” deed restricted units, but can the City get a better deal by requiring half of the units designated for local workers? What would be the cost benefit to the developer if that were the case? What is the cost/benefit with the proposed development agreement? Would the other one acre-parcels that remain in RA-1 be pressured/considered for an up zone at a later date and how would that affect the adjoining properties? Regarding the return of the Walnut Lane Bond: If the City returns the bond how easy will it be for them to acquire a new one when they come up with a bid package for the project? How much, if any, of the progress that was made on the Walnut Lane project can be used going forward (Site plans, infrastructure, etc.)? Interest rates will most likely be going up this year; how will that effect the project funding? Is the current bond amount ($6,500,000) enough to fund the initial phase of the project given inflation in almost all goods and services required for the project? Other funding sources to be explored? Is the City the only local government entity involved? Seems like the County as well as many other entities will benefit from what is to be “affordable” housing for local members of the work force? Public Hearing: Consideration of Location to Construct Pickleball Courts Presentation and Discussion: Mayor Langianese opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. It was explained the City has successfully applied for a grant for the construction of four pickleball courts and the next step in moving the project forward is site selection for the courts. Parks, Recreation and Trails Director McVay explained that, to assist in the site selection process, a committee of stakeholders had been convened. She said the committee brainstormed several locations and reviewed them against a set of criteria and grant stipulations and the committee recommended Old City Park. She said other sites considered included Swanny Park, the golf course, the high school and Sun Court. Councilmember Derasary asked about Sun Court and the ball fields and Councilmember Jones asked about the golf course site. McVay also explained the terms of the Utah Land and Water Conservation Fund grant of $80,000. Public Hearing: Rick Davidson stated pickleball is a diverse sport that has locally involved players aged 16 to 80 years old. He said Old City Park is not adjacent to the City limits but the sport is noisy and that Page 3 of 7 January 25, 2022 was a consideration of the selection committee. He said the site was perfect for the amount of money available for development. He said the high school tennis court location was good but is not owned by the City as required for the grant. Mr. Davidson stated pickleball is the fastest growing sport in America. He said it brings tourists and is a social sport. Written Comments: Cort Wright suggested Rotary Park. Wendy Newman suggested courts in the Spanish Trail Arena complex. Carter Lloyd wrote: I am a resident of Grand County and big fan of pickleball and would love to see the City add a few courts. This would be a great addition to the community. Mary Moran wrote: I live right above Old City Park, and only ask that if Old City Park is chosen as the pickleball court location, please leave the park dark at night. If there will be lighting installed for the courts, have them be motion-activated. I appreciate dark skies. Grand County has passed lighting ordinances. However, even within the ordinances, there is no need to have lighting that is on all night. Few people will use the courts after dark, so leave the park dark most of the time so as not to impact me and other neighbors, the nesting birds, and the wild ducks that join the few domestic ones in the pond. Thank you for considering dark night skies if this location is chosen. Mayor Langianese closed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. New Business: Consideration of Location to Construct Pickleball Courts—Approved Motion: Councilmember Jones moved to direct staff to pursue construction of pickleball courts at Old City Park with federal grant funds. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. Discussion: Councilmember Jones stated that, if funding changes, he did not want the City to be locked into the Old City Park location. Councilmember Derasary brought up written comments from the community. Ms. McVay explained that Sun Court is too small and night play at Old City Park was not likely since lighting costs would be prohibitive. Vote: The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson- Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Rotary Park Water Feature—Approved Briefing: Parks, Recreation and Trails Director McVay described the project. Councilmember Derasary thanked her for her efforts along with the Moab Irrigation Company and the City Water Department. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve an Agreement between Moab Irrigation Company and the City of Moab for the Rotary Park Moab Irrigation Company Water Feature. Councilmember Taylor seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Federal Funding for Transit Project—Approved Presentation and Discussion: Engineer Williams reviewed the ordinance to procure and authorize staff to pursue the transit shuttle pilot program and noted the contract was signed last year. Councilmember Derasary asked if the free, fixed route, which depended on demand, was to be determined by the operator. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding was discussed. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Ordinance 2022-02 amending the City of Moab Municipal Code to Authorize a Transit Pilot Project; authorizing the Mayor to Sign Various Certifications; and authorizing Procurement for System Operators and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Councilmember Wojciechowski seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Page 4 of 7 January 25, 2022 Transit Pilot Project Policies—Approved Discussion: Assistant Engineer Jolissaint explained policies must be adopted by the City to be eligible for funding and to establish the transit authority. Councilmember Derasary asked about nondiscrimination language. Engineer Williams stated attorneys, staff and consultants had reviewed the policies. A concern that the Moab Valley Multicultural Center had been overused for translation services was mentioned. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve Resolution 02-2022 Adopting Policies in Connection with the Moab Area Transit Pilot Project for Federal Funding. Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion. Councilmember Wojciechowski amended the motion to include nondiscrimination language in the policies. Councilmember Derasary seconded the amended motion. Councilmember Jones approved the amended motion. The amended motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Water Utility Resource Management Plan MOU—Approved Presentation and Discussion: Acting City Manager Castle stated the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) would establish a cost-sharing arrangement for water utility management. She said the water situation is a serious one and she wants the City to get a better understanding about the issue. She said the MOU would require closer coordination with the other public water systems. Castle stated the MOU describes cost-sharing between the City, Grand Water and Sewer Services Agency (GWSSA) and San Juan County to pay for the studies staff has specified. Castle added she included a scope of work in the MOU. Engineer Williams stated he selected a consultant to do the work to provide existing data to consider potential future needs and conditions such as sewer projects, water infrastructure projects and stormwater projects and added this would be the first comprehensive evaluation of surface and groundwater resources in the Valley and would consider needs at 20, 50 and 100-year periods. He acknowledged comments made in Citizens To Be Heard and stated there are opportunities for the City to use a different source of water for irrigation needs, rather than using culinary water. Councilmember Taylor asked if GWSSA and San Juan County had already signed on to the MOU. Councilmember Jones brought up the ongoing visioning process timeline and its potential impact on the proposed scope of the MOU and asked to have staff responses to Council inquiries stated in the meeting. Councilmember Derasary expressed concern that the City’s Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board had not reviewed the proposed MOU and asked if it could review it and Castle said no. Castle said perhaps the Water Advisory Board could review the scope of work. Derasary also said she had difficulty ascertaining who represented the water providers and asked for clarification about whether any elected officials were involved. She stated she had received several inquiries from members of the public regarding transparency. Councilmember Derasary stated her interest in having the Water Advisory Board meet with Council. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Taylor moved to approve a Memorandum of Understanding to develop a water utility resource management plan. Councilmember Knuteson- Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-1 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye and Councilmember Derasary voting nay. Shooting Range Lease Agreement—Approved Presentation and Discussion: Finance Director and Acting Deputy Manager Billingsley stated the twenty-year lease on the local law enforcement shooting range had expired. Concerns about lead mitigation were discussed, along with a proposal to share costs with other law enforcement agencies for the lease renewal and lead mitigation. Billingsley stated that if the owner wanted to terminate the lease after five years, they would give one year’s notice. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve Proposed Resolution 03- Page 5 of 7 January 25, 2022 2022: A Resolution Authorizing the Mayor to Sign the Amended and Restated Special Use Lease Agreement N. 1342, a Lease with the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration Authorizing the Use of State Lands for a Police Firearms Training Facility. Councilmember Taylor seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Old Business: Community Organization Liaison and Board Assignments—Approved Discussion: Councilmember Derasary suggested changing the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) board assignment to Councilmember Taylor, and she offered to take on the assignment of GWSSA. The Utah State University advisory board was mentioned, with former Councilmember Mike Duncan as a possible City representative. Mayor Langianese stated her interest in remaining on the board of the Canyonlands Health Care Center Special Services District. The Council’s legislative committee was brought up, and Councilmember Jones spoke about upcoming activity for the emergent transit committee. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve the Community Organization Liaison and Board Assignments with amendments as discussed. Councilmember Knuteson- Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Return of Bond Revenues—Approved Presentation and Discussion: Finance Director and Acting Deputy Manager Billingsley outlined the options regarding consideration to return the proceeds of the series 2021 sales tax revenue bond for the Walnut Lane affordable housing project. He said the City is paying more interest than it is earning and said alternate revenue streams could finance Phase I. He referenced the Workforce Assured Housing Ordinance (WAHO) funds along with monies from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). Councilmember Taylor brought up that Phase I would provide only eight units and expressed an interest in using funds to benefit the entire community and not just eight tenants. Councilmember Wojciechowski asked about the ability to fund various projects and asked about eligibility of the Master Lease proposal. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd thanked Mr. Billingsley for his work. Councilmember Taylor brought up the specter of rising interest rates. Councilmember Jones stated his disappointment but considered return of the bond revenues to be prudent. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve return of the proceeds of the series 2021 sales tax revenue bond for the Walnut Lane affordable housing project. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. 398 Kane Creek Boulevard Development Agreement—Approved Discussion: Councilmember Wojciechowski recused himself from the discussion due to his prior work on the Planning Commission. Applicant Jake Satterfield was in attendance. Councilmember Jones stated there was always uncertainty but felt the terms of the development agreement were close enough. Councilmember Taylor concurred and stated the project would provide some workforce housing. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd stated the proposed development agreement was imperfect and she felt the City was pushed into a corner, and she concurred with Councilmember Jones. Councilmember Derasary stated the development agreement resulted in a giveaway and did not include enough employee housing. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve a Development Agreement for 398 Kane Creek Blvd Parcel 01-0001-0173 between JSATT CORP, a Utah Corporation doing business as BLUE BISON DEVELOPMENT ("Developer") and the City of Moab, UT. Councilmember Taylor seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-1-1 aye with Page 6 of 7 January 25, 2022 Councilmembers Jones, Taylor and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye, Councilmember Derasary voting nay and Councilmember Wojciechowski abstaining. 398 Kane Creek Boulevard Rezone—Approved Discussion: Councilmember Wojciechowski remained recused for the rezone request. Planning Administrator Shurtleff introduced the zoning map amendment that included conditional approval. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Taylor moved to conditionally approve Ordinance 2021- 15, an Ordinance Approving a Zoning Map Amendment for Property located at Parcel #01- 0001-0173, approximately 398 Kane Creek Blvd, Moab UT 84532, and changing 7.51 acres of the subject parcel zone from RA-1 Residential-Agricultural Zone to R-3 Multi-Household Residential Zone, subject to the following condition: in the case that the Development Agreement fails, the conditions that would revert the property to the pre-existing, underlying zone district (RA-1), would follow standard municipal process for a rezone. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-1-1 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Taylor and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye, Councilmember Derasary voting nay and Councilmember Wojciechowski abstaining. Councilmember Wojciechowski returned to the meeting. Consent Agenda—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve Ordinance 2022-01: An Ordinance Amending Moab Municipal Code 13.24 Rates and Charges, and Minutes of the January 11, 2022, Regular City Council Meeting. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. Councilmember Derasary stated she sent corrections to the minutes to the Recorder. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Administrative Reports: Acting City Manager Castle stated the City had reintroduced the Community Contributions grant program for local nonprofits and noted the March 1 application deadline. She also announced ongoing construction on the Mill Creek waterline with traffic constraints at 400 East and Mill Creek Drive. She brought up dates for a team-building event and apologized for the City’s phone lines being out of order. Finance Director and Acting Deputy Manager Billingsley presented the City’s financial statement. Mayor and Council Reports: Councilmember Taylor announced he had visited the new EMS building and said calls were up 18 percent. He acknowledged letters from off-highway vehicle rental agencies and noted company owners want clarification. Councilmember Derasary stated she participated in meetings regarding the national groundwater monitoring network and System of Care, and noted the Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation Act (UMTRA) Moab project site had a new deputy director. She stated the Colorado River was expected to reach peak flows in March and brought up public art sculptures celebrating the Old Spanish Trail in Green River, and mentioned efforts to change code regarding evictions for owners of manufactured homes. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd mentioned meetings of the Canyonlands Health Care Special Services District, the Museum board and the Housing Authority and stated she participated in a land use workshop. Councilmember Wojciechowski stated he participated in a meeting of the mechanical advisory Page 7 of 7 January 25, 2022 committee and spoke about a need for better regulation or oversight of heating and cooling systems. Mayor Langianese reported she attended the land use workshop, and met with the hospital director to discuss senior housing. She stated she met with City and County representatives, as well as the City’s lobbyist, and Jayne May and her attorney Happy Morgan. Approval of Bills: Motion and vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve the bills against the City of Moab in the amount of $835,437.64. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Taylor, Knuteson-Boyd and Wojciechowski voting aye. Adjournment: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Wojciechowski seconded the motion. Mayor Langianese adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Joette Langianese, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: February 8th, 2022 Title:Streetlight LED Conversion Plan Presenter:Mila Dunbar-Irwin, Sustainability Director Attachment(s):None. Presentation at meeting. Recommended Motion:None. No action required. Background/Summary:The City of Moab is in the final stages of entering into a contract with Rocky Mountain Power to convert all RMP-owned / City-paid streetlights to Dark Sky compliant LED luminaires. City staff have inventoried all streetlights and calculated the recommended light levels for the replacement fixtures based on Illumination Engineering Society (IES) standards. IES standards for street lighting include two measurements - Uniformity and footcandles. Uniformity refers to the difference in lighting as a person travels down the street. If there were 100% uniformity the light on the whole street would be the same, and there would be no patches of dark or shadow in between lights. The current streetlight layout in Moab prevents the City from meeting the IES recommended standards for uniformity without adding poles, which is not contemplated at this time. Such uniformity may also not be desired by the community, and is not necessarily the ultimate goal. The second IES standard is footcandles. This is the experienced illumination on the ground under the light, and is calculated based on the height of the pole, the brightness of the light, and the photometric pattern of the luminaire.The proposed light levels for the streetlight conversion meet IES recommendations for footcandles according to the classification of the street. Footcandle recommendations differ based on the level of use of the street - local, collector, or main. The City has a number of different pole heights scattered throughout town, so one level of light is not appropriate to meet footcandle recommendations everywhere. There is no requirement that the City meet either IES recommendation, and as such, the Council may choose any combination of light levels they deem appropriate. City Staff chose the approach of meeting the IES footcandle illumination recommendations because the IES standards are designed to ensure both safety and adequate lighting for the use. Rocky Mountain Power does not have the ability to order or install sample lights prior to the City-wide conversion. All luminaires are a 3000K LED light and have a controlled, oblong photometric pattern with no uplight or glow. The product, which was chosen by Rocky Mountain Power, is the GE ERLC line. The spec sheets have been in previous City Council packets and are available on-line. All are Dark Sky compliant. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: February 8, 2022 Title: Discussion of Walnut Lane Redevelopment Alternatives Date Submitted: February 3, 2022 Staff Presenter: Carly Castle, Acting City Manager Jason Glidden, Housing Development Manager, Park City Municipal Attachment(s): o Sample Homestake MOU, courtesy of Park City Municipal o Sample Homestake RFQ, courtesy of Park City Municipal Options: Presentation, discussion, and possible action Recommended Motion: I move to recommend that City Staff pursue Alternative (1, 2, 3, other) for the Walnut Lane redevelopment project. Background/Summary: The purpose of this agenda item is to provide the Council with a more in-depth overview of options to move forward with the Walnut Lane redevelopment effort. During the January 11, 2022 meeting, the City Council was presented with a few different alternatives to proceed with the development and requested additional information about a master lease/public private partnership (PPP) option. Jason Glidden, Housing Development Manager for Park City Municipal, will be present at the meeting to present to Council information about master leases/PPPs, and Park City’s efforts to implement such a project. Walnut Lane Project Background Project Information • Location: 250 & 280 Walnut Lane; the property is divided into two parcels • Size: 2.91 acres • Zoning: R-4, with PAD approval • Use: Manufactured home park o 37 trailers on site at time of purchase o 26 occupied trailers currently; 8 demolished, 3 vacant and slated for demolition • Proposed use: 80 units, composed of apartments, duplexes, and townhomes Project Timeline • October 2018: City purchases Walnut Lane trailer park. • January 2020: Property was rezoned from split zone R-2 and R-4 to a contiguous R-4 zoning; the property was previously zoned R-2 in the northern half of the property. • March 2020: The City hired Architectural Squared (A^2) to provide master planning services. A^2 worked with City staff to develop a cohesive redevelopment plan for the project, including developing a master plan, phasing plan, economic pro forma, proposed redevelopment timeline, schematic renderings, and public engagement materials. We hosted a neighborhood meeting with current tenants and neighbors to discuss architectural style and materials and site amenity preferences. • July 2020: Council participated in a prioritization exercise for the redevelopment, which staff has referenced over time to ensure actions are meeting Council goals. In general, the Council prioritized housing over open space and parking for site plan composition, indicating the desire to maximize density as much as possible to provide ample units to current tenants and future Moab residents and to ensure financial feasibility. Council also indicated the funding priorities for the project should be focused on maintaining affordability and sustainability over providing site amenities. • February 2021: Council approved the preliminary PAD site plan application for the Walnut Lane Apartments, which will provide 80 units of affordable, sustainable multifamily housing, including 66 income-restricted units. • April 2021: The City acquires a $6.5MM Sales Tax Revenue Bond (STRB) from Zions Public Finance to fund the first two phases of redevelopment. • November 2021: The City receives pre-award notification to receive $613,061 in ARPA Local Assistance Matching Grant funding to provide gap financing for phase one of the project. • January 25, 2022: The City returns the $6.5MM STRB. Public-Private Partnership Case Study: Structure and Process in Park City Attached to this agenda summary are a RFQ and a MOU prepared by Park City pertaining to its selected developer for the Homestake affordable housing project. These documents are provided for the City Council’s consideration to understand some of the mechanisms and processes that could be used by Moab City staff if a PPP was pursued for any of the Walnut Lane development phases. A briefing of the two instruments is provided below. With the attached RFQ, Park City was seeking responses from developers interested in working with the City to design and construct a mixed income, multi-family housing project on the property. The project goal was primarily a residential, rental development that contains 80% or more affordable units, but the City was willing to consider an approach where residents could purchase individual housing units in the alternative. Park City received nine proposals, from both local and national firms, to develop the land for affordable housing. A RFQ selection committee, which consisted of City staff as well as private citizens, selected a developer that is experienced with affordable, multi-family residential rental projects; public/private partnerships and associated tax, grant, and regulatory matters; and the financing and operation of mixed-income housing. The purpose of the MOU is to guide the production and negotiation of the development agreement with the selected developer. The MOU ensures that the City Council’s priorities are met by outlining the overall goals of the partnership, a proposed timeline, and general terms to ultimately inform the final development agreement. This MOU is provided to the Moab City Council to illustrate what kind of parameters the City may negotiate in a similar situation, such as Walnut Lane. Ultimately, such an agreement for Walnut Lane would depend on the City’s redevelopment interests for the property, as well as the financial feasibility of the development. Under the Park City MOU, the developer commits to optimize the number of affordable units within the constraints of the property; create mixed-income housing made up of a minimum of 80% affordable rental housing and attains an average Area Median Income (AMI) level of 60%; deed restrict affordable units for 50 years; design a parking plan and accessibility plan that includes walkability features, secured bike parking, and alternative modes of transportation; seek neighborhood input through community meetings and/or outreach; and provide long-term operations and maintenance of the project. The City commits to retain ownership of the parcel, negotiate in good faith a ground lease that has terms and pricing contingent upon the securing of all financing for the development and operation of the project; and provide administrative support to successfully work through the required reviews and approvals through the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the project. The next steps for this Homestake affordable housing are the negotiation of the development agreement and signing of the lease. Moving Forward: Walnut Lane Alternatives Alternative 1—Continue as Planned • Pursue a design-bid-build process to develop Phase I internally, using existing ARPA funds and the WAHO. • Pursue a bid process to develop Phases II and III internally, likely acquiring bonds to finance the project. Pros • This option does not lock the City into a future scenario with Phases II and III. The City can pursue a hybrid alternative (Alternative 3) once Phase I is complete if desired. • The City retains the control and ensures the integrity of the project before, during, and after redevelopment. • The City benefits from the revenue generated from the project over time. • The City would certainly be able to utilize restricted ARPA and WAHO funds to develop. Cons • Property management continues to be a challenge • Project does not “pencil” until Phase III. • City must invest substantially more resources over time, which presents financial risk. • Project would likely be on hold until a Senior Projects Manager can be hired. • This option is higher risk, which is born completely by the City. Alternative 2—Public-Private Partnership • Solicit a master developer for the entire project (Phases I, II, and III). The City would publish an RFP or RFQ for a development team with the experience needed to manage, complete, and operate the project. City would sell or long-term lease the property to developer. Pros • Significantly reduces the amount of time and money necessary for the project. • More staff time and funding can be dedicated to other housing initiatives. • Reduces/eliminates property management burden. • This option presents the least financial risk to the City. Cons • This option will commit the City to this path for all three phases. • City loses a certain level of control over the project • City must ensure they trust the vision of the development team and the contractual agreements are legally sound (logistical/legal risk). • City does not reap the financial benefits of rent revenue over time. • Whether the City can use restricted ARPA funds for this scenario is unclear. Alternative 3—Hybrid Pros • Pursue a design-bid-build to develop Phase I internally, using awarded ARPA funds and the City’s WAHO funds. • Pursue a public-private partnership for Phases II and III. • Allows the City to use restricted ARPA funds for this project. • This option does not lock the City into a future scenario with Phases II and III. The City can pursue Alternative 1 once Phase I is complete if desired. • Significantly reduces the amount of time and money necessary for the project. • Certain balance of control over the project vs. the flexibility of the redevelopment being developer-led in Phases II and III. • More staff time and funding can be dedicated to other housing initiatives after Phase I. Cons • Property management will continue to be a challenge. • Possibility that the redevelopment will be less attractive to a developer if it does not include the entire property. • Project would likely be on hold until a Senior Projects Manager can be hired. • This option poses a medium amount of financial risk to the City. • The City will need to invest substantial resources to complete Phase I, while also devoting resources to designing a suitable PPP process. Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Page 1 of 7 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU" or "Memorandum"), is entered into on the day of December ___, 2021 (the "Effective Date"), by and between JF Development Group, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“J Fisher” or “Developer”), located at 1216 W Legacy Crossing Blvd, Centerville, Utah 84014, and Park City Municipal Corporation, a Utah municipal corporation, located at P.O. Box 1480, Park City, Utah 84060 (“City”). Developer and City may be referred to individually as (the "Party", or collectively, the "Parties"). 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The Parties hereby enter into this Memorandum to summarize their mutual agreements relating to the proposed development of a mixed-use, mixed income affordable housing development (the “Project”) on the 1.86-acre property owned by the City located at 1875 Homestake Road, Park City, Utah (the “Land”). A legal description of the Land is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein. This MOU reflects the Parties’ negotiations and is intended to outline the terms of a potential development agreement and/or ground lease (the “Agreements”). The Agreements will include additional terms and conditions which are not set forth herein. Until the Agreements are signed by both Parties, either Party may decide not to proceed with the proposed Agreements for any reason or no reason and may terminate this Memorandum by delivering at least sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other, subject to the provisions in this Memorandum. 2. SHARED GOALS OF THE PARTIES Developer and City desire to create high-quality housing options for the community. The Parties desire to maximize the number of units attaining average affordability of 60% of AMI. A mix of unit types is envisioned to include 2-bedroom units to accommodate some families. The Parties desire the Project to be a model of responsible design attaining high levels of resource efficiency which align with the City’s sustainability and net-zero energy goals, as well as high levels of integration into the City’s trails and transit plans. 3. RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF DEVELOPER Developer agrees that the Project would be developed under the following terms, conditions, and constraints: a. There would be at least 80% or more affordable units that meet the standards of the City’s Housing Resolution 05-2021, which affordable units would include a range of mixed-income units at various area median income or market rate targets; b. Affordable units will have a minimum affordability period of (i) fifty (50) years from the certificate of occupancy, or (ii) the length of the ground lease, whichever is greater; c. Developer will oversee thorough assessments of the environmental, physical, and geologic conditions of the Land. All work performed pursuant to this MOU shall require City’s prior written approval and City shall bear the cost of all such work. Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Page 2 of 7 d. Project will comply with all local and state building codes, and will be consistent with the pillars of the Park City 2020 Vision; e. The project will be designed to meet PCMC Design Code and optimize allowable density on the site, and produces a high-quality, enduring living environment that promotes sustainable and environmentally friendly practices; f. Developer will deliver a construction plan that helps to meet the energy goals of the City and will work in good faith with the City to achieve the City’s Net-Zero energy requirements as described in “Exhibit B” attached hereto and made a part hereof, including elimination of on-site combustion if reasonably achievable; g. Developer will present conceptual design, schematic design, design development, and final construction documents for review and approval by the City at each stage of design prior to advancing to next stage; h. Developer will initially provide predevelopment funding and all necessary financing to develop the Project that will not require any additional funding from the City (outside of the agreed upon ground lease for the Land), unless otherwise agreed upon between the Parties to achieve additional affordability, sustainability, or other stretch goals as determined by the City; i. Developer will work with the City’s Transportation Planning department to design a parking plan and accessibility that includes walkability features, secured bike parking, alternative modes of transportation, and reduces residents’ reliance on personal vehicle use; j. Developer will seek neighborhood input through community meetings and/or outreach; k. Developer will coordinate monthly progress meetings with a Project Management Group consisting of the Developer, Architect, General Contractor, along with the City’s Housing Development Manager, and other City’s designees; l. Developer will provide long-term operations and maintenance of the Project, including resident services programming; m. Developer will provide the City with quarterly operating reports including occupancy, rents, collections, maintenance activities and resident communications/complaint resolutions throughout the life of the Project; and n. Developer anticipates commencing development activities, as further illustrated in the milestone schedule reflected on “Exhibit C” attached hereto and incorporated herein, no later than one (1) year after the execution of the Agreements (or such other feasible date that may be agreed to by the Parties after execution of this Memorandum), subject to the satisfactory and commercially reasonable response, approval and cooperation from the City and associated approval authorities. Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Page 3 of 7 4. RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF CITY City agrees that the Project shall be developed under the following terms, conditions and constraints: a. City retains ownership of the Land; b. City will allow Developer access to Land for surveying and/or testing, as required for planning and due diligence prior to the execution of Agreements; c. City will negotiate in good faith a ground lease that has terms and pricing which are contingent upon the securing of all financing for the development and operation of the Project; d. City will provide administrative support to successfully work through the required reviews and approvals through issuance of certificate of occupancy for the Project; e. City will assist in engaging with the neighborhood for community meetings and/or outreach; f. City will use good faith, diligent efforts to cooperate with Developer in seeking its applicable entitlements, approvals, and permits for the Project; and g. City will work in good faith with Developer to achieve acceptable Project feasibility through appropriate support and consideration of environmental remediation, affordability, design, sustainability, transportation, and other Project requirements and preferences. 5. TERMS OF UNDERSTANDING Subject to Section 1, the term of this Memorandum shall be for a period of two (2) years from the Effective Date and may be extended upon written mutual agreement of both Parties. Upon execution hereof, the Parties will use diligent, good faith efforts to finalize and execute the Agreements. The Agreements will supersede and terminate this Memorandum. 6. LEGAL COMPLIANCE The Parties acknowledge and understand that they must be able to fulfill their responsibilities under this Memorandum in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof and the provisions of the law and regulations that govern their activities. Nothing in the Memorandum is intended to negate or otherwise render ineffective any such provisions or operating procedures. The Parties assume full responsibility for their performance under the terms of this Memorandum and acknowledge time is of the essence. If at any time either Party is unable to perform their duties or responsibilities under this Memorandum as required hereunder, the affected Party shall immediately provide written notice to the other Party to establish a date for resolution of the matter. Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Page 4 of 7 7. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY No rights or limitation of rights shall arise or be assumed between the Parties as a result of the terms of this Memorandum. 8. NOTICES Any notice or communication required or permitted under this Memorandum shall be sufficiently given if delivered in person, by email, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address set forth below or to such address that has been furnished to the other in writing. Park City Municipal Corporation Jason Glidden Housing Development Manager jglidden@parkcity.org 445 Marsac Ave Park City, Utah 84060 J Fisher Ryan Davis Partner ryan.davis@jfisherco.com 1216 W Legacy Crossing Blvd, Ste 300 Centerville, UT 84014 9. GOVERNING LAW This Memorandum shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah. 10. COST REIMBURSEMENT As part of its due diligence to deliver the Project, Developer may incur additional future environmental, geotechnical, civil engineering, architectural, and other predevelopment costs (“Predevelopment Costs”). In the event the City, through no fault of the Developer, elects to terminate this Memorandum pursuant to Section 1 or does not enter into the Agreements with Developer within one (1) year of the Effective Date, the City shall, within sixty (60) calendar days of written notice from Developer, reimburse Developer the actual Predevelopment Costs incurred, not to exceed FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00). Developer will provide invoices and documentation to support the Predevelopment Costs with written request for reimbursement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY To the maximum extent permitted by law, this Memorandum is strictly confidential and is submitted on the basis that this MOU, including its existence, or any of its terms and contents, together with any other confidential information disclosed by either Party to the other, may not be disclosed to anyone other than the receiving Party’s directors, officers, employees and advisers on a need-to-know basis, without first obtaining the prior written consent of the disclosing Party or otherwise required by law. This provision shall survive for twelve (12) months after any termination of this Memorandum, except to the extent caused by the execution of the Agreements. The City is subject to the requirements of the Government Records Access and Management Act, Chapter 2, Title 63G, Utah Code,1953, as amended and Park City Municipal Code Title 5 Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Page 5 of 7 (“GRAMA”). All materials submitted by Developer pursuant to this Agreement are subject to disclosure unless such materials are exempt from disclosure pursuant to GRAMA. The burden of claiming an exemption from disclosure rests solely with Developer. Any materials for which Developer claims a privilege from disclosure based on business confidentiality shall be submitted marked as “confidential - business confidentiality” and accompanied by a concise statement from Developer of reasons supporting its claim of business confidentiality. Generally, GRAMA only protects against the disclosure of trade secrets or commercial information that could reasonably be expected to result in unfair competitive injury. The City will make reasonable efforts to notify Developer of any requests made for disclosure of documents submitted under a claim of confidentiality. Developer specifically waives any claims against the City related to any disclosure of materials pursuant to GRAMA. 12. EXCLUSIVITY The City agrees that, for two (2) years after the Execution Date, City will not enter into any binding or non-binding agreements concerning any financing, investment, operational, or business arrangements on the Land, or otherwise enter into any agreement that would preclude or materially impair the Developer from performing the responsibilities or accomplishing its obligations herein. The Parties agree to negotiate in good faith the terms and provisions of the Agreements and to use reasonable, diligent efforts to finalize and execute such Agreements. 13. AUTHORIZATION AND EXECUTION The purpose of this Memorandum is to set forth the general description of a proposed transaction and to indicate the willingness of the Parties to continue negotiations with respect to such transaction, using good faith and to the best of their abilities, the goals and objectives stated in this MOU. The signing of this Memorandum shall not constitute a legally binding agreement between the Parties or place a legally enforceable obligation upon the Parties, except with respect to the Cost Reimbursement, Confidentiality, and Exclusivity provisions contained herein, which provisions shall survive the termination of this Memorandum. 14. ASSIGNABILITY This Memorandum shall not be assignable by either Party without the express written consent of other Party; provided; however, that Developer may assign its interest in this Memorandum, and its rights and obligations hereunder, to an entity that controls, is controlled by, or under common control with the Developer upon written notice to the City, which notice shall include the assignee’s written confirmation that it has assumed Developer’s interest and rights and obligations under this Memorandum. Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Page 6 of 7 15. COUNTERPARTS This Memorandum may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 16. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Each party agrees that the signatures of the parties included in this Memorandum, whether affixed on an original document manually and later electronically transmitted or whether affixed by an electronic signature through an electronic signature system such as DocuSign, are intended to authenticate this writing and to create a legal and enforceable agreement between the parties hereto. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Page 7 of 7 This MOU shall be signed by Park City Municipal Corporation and JF Development Group, LLC, and shall be effective as of the date first written above. CITY: PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, a Utah municipal corporation By: ______________________________ Name/Title: Andy Beerman, Mayor DEVELOPER: JF DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, a Utah limited liability company By: J. FISHER COMPANIES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company Its: Manager By: ______________________________ Name/Title: Owen Fisher, its Manager Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Exhibit A EXHIBIT A Property Address: 1875 Homestake Road, Park City, Utah Parcel Number: YARD-B-1AM-X Total Acreage: 1.86 Zoning: General Commercial Zoning District Legal Description: LOT B THE YARD SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDED; ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT ON FILE IN THE SUMMIT COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE. CONT 1.86 AC. 2408-4 Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Exhibit B EXHIBIT B PARK CITY MUNICIPAL NET-ZERO POLICY RESOLUTION 28-2017 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING NET-ZERO ENERGY PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL NEW OR RENOVATED BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED USING FUNDS ALLOCATED BY PARK CITY, UTAH TO PROMOTE ENERGY EFFICIENCY, REDUCTION OF CARBON EMISSIONS, AND SUSTAINABLE DESIGN WHEREAS, the City has adopted ambitious climate and energy targets to be net-zero carbon and running on 100% renewable electricity by 2022 for municipal operations and by 2032 community wide; and WHEREAS, buildings and facilities currently account for approximately thirty-nine percent of carbon emissions from municipal operations; and WHEREAS, the City desires to promote sound environmental practices in new construction and renovation of facilities that are funded by the City; and WHEREAS, buildings and facilities designed and verified to be net-zero energy with the collaboration of appropriate commissioning agent(s) and energy modeler does not increase the costs of the building when taken over the lifetime of the project. Efficiency measures and on-site renewables incorporated during the design phase of the facility does not significantly increase the cost of the facility; and WHEREAS, buildings designed for sustainability promote a healthy environment, provide long-term cost benefits through the efficient use of energy, optimize building performance, and create healthier workplaces for employees and visitors; and WHEREAS, a strategic approach to sustainable buildings and ener.gy management can produce twice the savings for the bottom line and the environment as typical approaches; and WHEREAS, the International Livings Futures lnstitute's Energy Petal certification, a score of zero from the Zero Energy Performance Index, and Passive House certification verify a building's actual performance on an annual basis. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Park City as follows: SECTION 1. REQUIRE MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES TO BE VERIFIED AS NET-ZERO ENERGY. It is the intent of the City Council of Park City that all new buildings and major renovations be designed and perform to a standard of net-zero energy on an on-site basis. That is, all new and renovated buildings and facilities must produce the same amount or more renewable energy as the facility uses on an annual basis. According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in general, a net-zero energy building is one that balances the annual energy use with renewable energy, thereby reducing the use of non-renewable energy in the building sector. For the purposes of this policy, the net-zero definition shall apply to any building or facility designed and constructed using Park City Municipal Corporation capital funds and refers to on-site energy usage and production. Net-zero energy buildings use all cost-effective measures to reduce energy usage through energy efficiency and include renewable energy systems that produce enough energy to meet remaining energy needs. There are a number of long-term advantages of moving toward net-zero energy buildings, including lower operating and maintenance costs, lower environmental impacts, improved comfort levels, better resiliency to power outages and natural disasters, and improved energy security. The measurements for Park City's net-zero buildings are through annual energy consumption minus annual on-site energy production. Related to the energy usage, the carbon emissions will also be tracked. An additional metric to determine the energy efficiency of buildings is Energy Use Intensity (EUI). Buildings should achieve an EUI of 25 or below. Emissions from construction activities are excluded. A building that achieves the net-zero energy definition should first and foremost reduce the energy needs through all cost-effective and demand-avoidance strategies. That is, all buildings and facilities using Park City Municipal Corporation funds must be built as energy-efficient as possible. To offset the remaining energy needs of the building, use on-site installed renewable energy (preferred). If on-site renewable energy production is not possible to meet the entire energy budget of the building or facility, a plan for offsetting any remaining emissions within City boundaries must be submitted for approval by City Council. Section 2. REQUIRE FACILITIES BE DESIGNED, COMMISSIONED, AND VERIFIED TO BE NET-ZERO ENERGY. To ensure these project outcomes, additional specialists are required and contracted directly by the Architect/Design Team for all building projects with expected energy consumption over 1 MMBtus annually. The following personnel must work together to provide the Energy Use Intensity (EUI), annual fuel usage (in MMBtus), and annual electricity usage (kWh). In addition, expected return on investment (ROI) of installed energy efficient technologies and renewable energy installations should be submitted. 1. Energy Modeler Engineer (EME) -Works with the Architect to optimize/validate the design and confirm that energy modeling carries through as changes to the design are made; compares life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of various equipment and design options to assist in informing value engineering and budget considerations. A specialist dedicated to energy management and energy modeling, the EME ensures that the systems designed by the Architect actually comply with the energy performance desired. 2. Building Envelope Commissioning Agent (BECxA) -The building envelope is the critical container of the energy efficiency features and largely determines operation costs and occupant comfort. The BECxA works with Architect, EME, and Contractors to ensure that the building envelope is properly designed to achieve energy goals and that it is actually constructed as designed. Building components included in the building envelope comm1ss1on include below-grade construction and foundation, exterior enclosure construction above grade, walls, claddings, fenestration, sheathing, framing, insulation, air and vapor barriers, drainage control layers, roofing, roofing insulation, skylights, hatches and any roof openings/penetrations ... all of the components that impact long-term performance of the enclosure. 3. Mechanical Engineer/Commissioning Agent (CxA) -Working with the Architect, EME and Contractors, the CxA ensures that the building systems (cooling, heating, steam, air handling, plumbing, emergency power and sprinkler systems, renewable energy systems, electrical, and building automation systems) have been designed and installed to function properly together, are tested and balanced, and commissioned. Follow-up verification is conducted at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months to ensure that the building systems are performing as intended. The Owner, design team, EME, BECxA and CxA review each design phase (concept, schematic, design development, construction documents) submittal for compliance to the selected net-zero certification. All are involved throughout the construction process and work with contractors to remedy sub-optimal performance before building completion and any deficiencies discovered after occupancy. All new projects that are built using municipal funding must call for net-zero energy buildings and facilities, with a focus on achieving net-zero performance. Prior to the end of the Schematic Design (SD) phase, the architect and energy modeler must evaluate the feasibility of pursuing one of three net-zero building certifications: 1) The Living Building Challenge's Energy Petal Certification; or 2) The zEPI (Zero Energy Performance Index) score of O; or 3) Passive House Certification, with on-site renewable systems to achieve net-zero energy performance. In addition, all new projects that are built using municipal funding must segregate the major loads of the building (i.e. sub metering) into e.g. lighting, HVAC, plug loads. SECTION 3. APPLY THIS RESOLUTION TO THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS. Park City will apply this policy to the following construction projects design when the contract is first solicited after the date of this Resolution, except as exempted or waived under this Resolution: All new construction to construct buildings or facilities owned and controlled by the City, or using any City funds for construction, including all affordable housing projects developed by the City, and all major renovations of buildings owned and controlled by the City when the remaining has a useful life in. excess of fifteen years. The term "major renovation" means a construction project affecting more than 25% of the building's square footage. SECTION 4. EXEMPT PROJECTS FROM THIS POLICY WITH CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. Park City will not apply this resolution to the following, and City departments are required to document the reason for the exemption: • Buildings or facilities where on-site renewable energy production is physically impossible, cost-prohibitive, or unsafe. Note: determination of cost-prohibitive will be determined by City Council on a project-by-project basis. • Projects where the useful life of an improvement does not justify whatever additional expense would be incurred to increase the efficiency. • Projects where the use of net-zero will create an impediment to construction due to conflicts of laws, building code requirements, federal or state grant funding requirements, or other similar requirements. • Process equipment for water treatment and distribution, e.g. pumps, treatment and filtration equipment, underground vaults, metering equipment. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution shall become effective upon adoption. PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ~~ MaOrJaCk Thomas Approved as to form: Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Exhibit C EXHIBIT C MILESTONE SCHEDULE The dates provided herein are explicitly targets and not contractual obligations. December 2021 • Architecture: Yield Study • Architecture: Preliminary Concept Sketch • Architecture: Site Analysis • Contract: Sign MOU • Community Engagement: Neighborhood Meetings & Public Input • Community Engagement: Media Strategy January 2022 • Architecture: Conceptual Design • Planning: Initial Council Work Session February 2022 • Architecture: Schematic Design • Planning: Preliminary MPD & CUP Submission to Park City • Contract: Option to Ground Lease Executed • Contract: Begin Ground Lease Drafting March 2022 • Planning: Planning Staff Review April 2022 • Planning: Planning Staff Review May 2022 • Planning: Planning Commission Work Session June 2022 • Planning: First Planning Commission Hearing • Architecture: Design Documents • Contract: Ground Lease Executed July 2022 • Planning: Second Planning Commission Hearing August 2022 • Planning: Planning Commission Approval • Financing: Private Activity Bond and UHC Application Deadline Homestake MOU – PCMC & J Fisher Exhibit C September 2022 • Architecture: Construction Drawings October 2022 • Financing: Private Activity Bond Board Meeting and Award • Construction: Construction Bids November 2022 • Permitting: Footing & Foundation and Building Permit • Construction: Groundbreaking Q1-Q2 2023 • Financing: Financial Close Q3-Q4 2024 • Construction: Certificate of Occupancy REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 1875 HOMESTAKE PARK CITY, UTAH RELEASE DATE I April 30, 2021 SUBMISSION DEADLINE I May 28, 2021 2 NOTICE TO DEVELOPERS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS Homestake Development Partnership PROPOSALS DUE: By 3:00 p.m. on Friday, May 28, 2021 Via e-mail to Jason Glidden Housing Development Manager at: jglidden@parkcity.org. PROJECT NAME: 1875 Homestake Road – Development Partnership RFQ AVAILABLE: The RFQ is available from Housing Development Manager Jason Glidden at: jglidden@parkcity.org. Any modifications or addendums including questions to the RFQ will be made in redlined form on the website each week. Please check the RFQ on the website each Friday. PROJECT LOCATION: 1875 Homestake Road, Park City, Utah OWNER/CONTACT: Jason Glidden Housing Development Mgr./Senior Project Mgr. Park City Municipal Corporation P.O. Box 1480 Park City, Utah 84060 All questions shall be submitted in writing by 2:00 p.m. on Friday, May 21, 2021, to Jason Glidden at: jglidden@parkcity.org. Park City Municipal Corporation (“PCMC” or the “City”) reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received for any reason. Furthermore, the City shall have the right to waive any informality or technicality in proposals received when in the best interest of the City. In the event of difficulty submitting electronically, proposals can be dropped off to the City Recorder, located at 445 Marsac Avenue, Third Floor – Executive Department, Park City, UT 84060. Proposals submitted through the City Recorder should be received on a zip drive. No paper copies should be submitted. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I – PROJECT INFORMATION…………….............................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................3 CURRENT STATUS....................................................................................................................3 PREFERRED SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT....................................................................................3 WRITTEN AGREEMENTS REQUIRED ........................................................................................3 DEVELOPER’S OBLIGATIONS ...................................................................................................4 PROJECT MANAGER.................................................................................................................5 SECTION II – SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURE...................................................... 5 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................5 SUBMISSION PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................6 SECTION III – SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA ........................................................................ 7 SELECTION PROCESS................................................................................................................7 SELECTION CRITERIA ...............................................................................................................8 SECTION IV – DESIGN REVIEW AND PERMITTING......................................................................... 8 SECTION V – PCMC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS .................................................................................. 9 SECTION VI – MISCELLANEOUS ....................................................................................................9 SECTION VII – PCMC AND CITY NON-LIABILITY AND RELATED MATTERS……………..…….……………….10 SECTION VIII – EXHIBITS ..............................................................................................................12 EXHIBIT A – Property Description...........................................................................................13 EXHIBIT B – Project Requirements, and Preferences .............................................................14 4 SECTION I - PROJECT INFORMATION INTRODUCTION Park City has a community goal of developing 800 affordable units by 2026. In an effort to further that goal, the City has identified public/private partnerships as a possible opportunity, as part of the 2021 Ammendment to the 2020 Housing Assessment and Plan. Park City Municipal Corporation (“PCMC”) owns 1.86 acres located at 1875 Homestake Road (“Property”) in the Bonanza Business District in close proximity to the proposed Art & Culture District as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. PCMC requests Statements of Qualifications (“Responses”) from experienced developers (“Respondents”) interested in working with PCMC to design and construct a mixed income, multi-family housing project (“Project”) on the Property. The Project goal is primarily a residential, rental development that contains 80% or more affordable units, but the City may consider an approach where residents could purchase individual housing units in the alternative. PCMC seeks to enter into a partnership to timely deliver a successful and financially viable residential development that maximizes the number of affordable units for the longest term. To this end, PCMC seeks a developer experienced with affordable, multi-family residential rental projects, urban infill, brownfield redevelopment, public/private partnerships and associated tax, grant and regulatory matters, and the financing and operation of mixed-income housing. PCMC will partner in the Project by providing all the land specified in Exhibit A: Property Description and may work with Developer to provide financial tools and incentives for a Project that achieves a high level of affordable housing and community benefits as outlined in Exhibit B: Project Requirements and Preferences. Refer to Section V – PCMC Development Tools for additional information. The developer selected by PCMC (“Developer”) must be willing to complete the following as part of the Project: • Design a new Project for the Property containing a vibrant mix of uses, including, but not limited to,affordable and market rate housing, resident amenity spaces, walkability features, parking improvements, and possibly complimentary commercial space • Lease the Property at a price to be negotiated with PCMC, taking into account the above requirements. Construct and operate the Project per future agreements with PCMC. SITE CHARACTERISTICS Located in the General Commercial Zoning District, the Property is 1.86 acres in size and is in close proximity to the Park City Mountain Resort, Historic Main Street, multiple Park City transit stops, and the proposed Art & Culture District. The property is currently a parking lot with no structures present. Developer will work with PCMC to conduct a thorough assessment of the soils on the Property and remove and/or remediate them as necessary in order to construct the selected developer’s preferred 5 program on the Property. This includes removal and hauling of any contaminated soils, as well as capping remaining soils left on property in accordance with Park City’s Soil ordinance. PCMC will provide assistance in remediation of contaminated soils. Condition of title is subject to the developer’s due diligence. Please refer to Exhibit A Property Description for additional information about the Property. Land is “as is” and all statements and descriptions herein are general in nature subject to responders’ verification of site conditions and site inspection prior to submission and final agreements. The City makes no implied or express warranties or warranties for particular purpose regarding the Property. WRITTEN AGREEMENTS REQUIRED Development Agreement. Upon completion of the selection process, the successful respondent (“Developer”) will be required to enter into a written Development Agreement (“DA”) with PCMC. The responsibilities of the Developer shall be defined and detailed in that DA. The DA will likely contain, but will not be limited to, the below provisions. Developers responding to this RFQ shall acknowledge their receipt and review of these terms in their proposals. 1. Developer will develop a construction budget and a proposed operations and maintenance budget for the project, both of which require approval by the City. 2. Developer will investigate (City will provide previous conducted environmental studies) the environmental condition of the site and undertake any necessary remediation or management of any contamination of the site. Once a remediation plan has been developed and approved by the City, the City willprovide assistance in the remediation of contaminated soils. 3. Developer will be responsible for financing the entire cost of the project, including predevelopment costs such as design, engineering, and other studies along with development costs, such as infrastructure and construction costs, through its own equity, borrowing, tax credits, governmental incentives, or other sources of funds. In approaching the development of these projects, the Developer should be careful not to rely exclusively upon tax credit financing. PCMC believes that such an approach restricts the market of individuals who can reside at the project, and does not allow for the creation of a true mixed income community. PCMC encourages the development of profitable market rate units to serve as a mechanism for maximizing the number of affordable units to be developed. 4. Developer will prepare a timetable for beginning and completing construction of the project that is satisfactory to the City. 5. Developer will be responsible for procuring all necessary regulatory approvals for construction and operation of the project. 6. Developer must actively seek input from community stakeholders, neighborhood associations and residents, and the City during the planning phase of all projects. The final development plan must be approved by the City in accordance with all planning and zoning requirements. Transparency and communication are key components of community trust and confidence in public housing and the Housing Authority. Engagement and active participation of residents, businesses, neighborhood associations, governmental officials and agencies, and other community stakeholders is a 6 mandatory requirement under this solicitation. It is expected that the developers will schedule and coordinate meetings, community workshops and other public forums to assure that all stakeholders in the development process are continuously kept abreast of ongoing activity. All community activities and dissemination of public information shall be coordinated with the Housing Authority, PCMC’s Public Information Officer, and the Housing Department Project Manager. 7. Developer will be responsible for monthly progress meetings with the Project Advisory Group (Developer, Architect, General Contractor, Housing Development Manager, City’s Project Manager) throughout planning and construction of the project. 8. Developer will be responsible for long term operation and maintainance of the project, ensuring that the project continues to meet all federal, state, and local codes and provides a clean and healthy environment for all residents and guests. 9. In the event Developer does not commence active construction or have a substantial portion of the planning of the project completed (including Master Planned Development (MPD) approval) within one (1) year of the lease of the site, the City shall have the right to terminate the lease and take possession of the site. Extensions to this deadline may be negotiated. 10. Developer shall not sell, convey, sublease or otherwise transfer or assign any rights incorporated into any agreement with PCMC without prior and written consent of the City Council. 11. Developer will present conceptual design, schematic design, design development, and final construction documents for review and approval by PCMC. Approval by PCMC does not in any way relieve Developer of its obligation to comply with zoning regulations, building codes, and all other applicable regulations adopted by PCMC. 12. Developer will be responsible for obtaining and providing written proof to PCMC of adequate financing for all aspects of the development, including predevelopment, construction, and operations. 13. Developer will be responsible for designing and building the development in a manner that produces a high-quality, enduring living environment that promotes sustainable and environmentally friendly practices. 14. Developer’s contractor will be required to obtain payment and performance bonds or an equivalent form of security approved by the City. 15. Developer will be required to maintain, or cause others to maintain, property, contractor, architect, and other applicable insurance through a contract in an amount and form (City template) approved by the City. 16. Developer will be required to prepare and record covenants, conditions, and restrictions (“CC&R’s”) against the Property in compliance with the Park City Housing Resolution in effect at the time of signing of the DA. 17. Developer will be responsible for managing and operating the development consistent with ground lease terms in a manner that ensures long-term financial viability and a high-quality living environment for its residents. 18. Developer will be responsible for a construction plan, including a construction mitigation plan, that helps to meet the energy goals of Park City. A financial loan through the City may be available to achieve energy goals. 7 Additional Agreements. Developer must be willing to enter into certain agreements in addition to the DA pertaining to the Project that outline the type, size, uses, and timeframe for development. These agreements include, but are not limited to: 1. Long term lease of the Property that shall include an option to cancel said agreementif the Project is not completed and used as agreed as well as a City purchase option and first right of refusal for all fixed improvements under Ground Lease or Purchase Agreement. City option to cure and take over in the event of foreclosure or bankruptcy. 2. Restrictive Use Agreement with restrictive covenants on the affordable housing units that run with the land for a period of at least fifty (50) years, including survival in the event of foreclosure or bankruptcy . 3. Easement Agreement that ensures public pedestrian access around and through the Property is maintained. PROJECT MANAGER For additional information concerning this Request for Qualifications, as well as any issued addenda, interested parties may contact Jason Glidden, Housing Development Manager, via email only at jglidden@parkcity.org. 8 SECTION II - SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS As part of a response to this RFQ, respondents shall provide the following information. Responses must address all items and clearly label all sections, graphics, and tables within the Response. The PCMC has not set a specific page limit for Responses; however, there is an expectation to receive Responses that are thorough but concise. 1. Development Interest and Approach a. Briefly describe your interest in pursuing the Project. b. Provide a description of your approach to dealing with the complexity of the Project, including dealing with contaminated soils, infrastructure deficiencies, and zoning relating to the improvements currently in-place on the Property. c. Provide a brief narrative of your preliminary concepts for the site’s development. This should provide insight into your general approach to development, proven ability to navigate complex projects, record of community responsive urban infill developments that provide public benefits, and understanding of creative solutions and financing tools. This is an opportunity to provide a preliminary high level vision. No architectural drawings or financial projections are expected at this stage. However, proposals should detail your plan to: i. Provide housing affordable to a range of income levels in the Project Goals and Preferred Scope of Development described herein; ii. Maintain long term affordability; iii. Minimize need for City funding through leverage of outside funding; iv. Utilize environmentally friendly and sustainable principles for development; and v. Facilitate active transportation connections within and to the community and surrounding neighborhood in close coordination with PCMC. 2. Qualifications and Experience. Provide a description of your qualifications and relevant experience with comparable projects, including: a. A description of the legal entity with whom PCMC would contract. b. Identification, bios for and descriptions of the roles of key individuals in the development team and any consultants who would be involved in negotiations, project management, project design, and implementation, including their background and experience, reflecting their capabilities and experience with similar projects; c. Examples of your experience with comparable projects. Provide no more than five (5) examples highlighting experience with development and operation of projects of similar size and scope, with particular emphasis on complex mixed-income projects located in an urban environment and projects developed through public-private partnerships. Examples should include images, location, development program, breakdown of residential affordability mix, members of the development team, total development cost, financing structure, project 9 schedule, role of the public sector, information on challenges faced and solutions achieved, and a local reference. d. A description of your experience in financing mixed-use, affordable or mixed income housing, securing grants and public funding sources, and financing references. Provide the composition of the current real estate portfolio owned and/or managed by the respondent and a list of all projects in the development pipeline including location, status, schedule, estimated cost and financing structure. Please also describe the developer’s capacity for completing the proposed Project in the context of the current development pipeline. e. A description of your financial capacity. The Developer will be required to submit additional financial information about the development entity and its owners while negotiating the Lease Agreement with PCMC. If a newly formed entity is proposed as the legal vehicle for acting as the developer, the proposed guarantors of the entity and their net worth must be identified. This description should include the following: i. Evidence of your ability to fund predevelopment costs; and ii. Anticipated sources of funds, current relationships with lenders and equity investors, and ability to obtain necessary financing for the proposed development, including recent history of obtaining debt and equity financing. f. PCMC requires the use of sustainable building practices and the inclusion of energy efficiency elements in all of its development projects. You may include as part of its qualifications a description of the sustainable building practices and/or energy efficiency measures that have been incorporated in previous projects. g. Disclosure of any litigation that could have a materially adverse effect on the development entity’s financial condition and disclosure of any bankruptcy filings by the development entity or affiliates within the past five (5) years. h. A Conflict of Interest statement or disclosure that complies with Section 3 of the Park City Municipal Code. SUBMISSION PROCEDURE Respondents shall submit an electronic copy of the Response in PDF format and send via email to Jason Glidden at jglidden@parkcity.org. Submissions lacking one or more of the required documents shall be considered incomplete and subject to disqualification from consideration by PCMC. All Responses, including attachments, supplementary materials, addenda, etc., shall become the property of the City and will not be returned. It is Respondents’ sole responsibility to read and interpret this Request for Qualifications and the written instructions contained herein. The first page of the Response shall: 1. State that Respondent “has read and understands this Request for Qualifications and accepts the written instructions contained herein”. 2. Include the signature of an officer or employee authorized to bind the Respondent contractually. 3. Provide the name, contact phone number, email address, and mailing address of the person to whom all correspondence should be sent regarding questions about the Response, requests for 10 interviews, or notifications regarding potential selection. (This person will be responsible for disseminating information to you and your development team.) Responses shall be submitted in a sealed envelope with the Respondent’s name, address, date of submittal, and the title “1875 Homestake” shown on the outside of the envelope. Please submit Responses to the Request for Qualifications to: Jason Glidden, Housing Development Manager Park City Municipal Corporation 445 Marsac Ave., P.O. Box 1480 Park City, Utah 84060 jglidden@parkcity.org Responses are due by 3:00 p.m. on Friday, May 28, 2021. Responses to the Request for Qualifications that are not received by PCMC by the time and date specified will be considered late and thus subject to disqualification from consideration by PCMC. PCMC reserves the right to reject any late, incomplete, or irregular submissions and reserves the right to waive any non-material irregularity in submissions. SECTION III – SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA SELECTION PROCESS PCMC will make every effort to ensure that all Responses are treated fairly and equally throughout the selection process. PCMC intends to follow the following selection process: 1. Identify a short-list of Respondents: PCMC will form a Selection Advisory Committee comprised of representatives from public and private stakeholders to review the submitted Responses and provide recommendations to PCMC. PCMC will take the Selection Advisory Committee’s recommendations into consideration and identify a shortlist of Respondents. 2. Identify a First- and Second-ranked Respondent: PCMC will notify the Respondents selected for the shortlist and may ask them to participate in an interview to discuss their qualifications in further detail. PCMC may select a first-ranked and second-ranked Respondent. 3. Negotiations with First-ranked Respondent: The first-ranked Respondent will be given a defined period of time to negotiate and execute a Lease Agreement with PCMC. In the event that exclusive negotiations are conducted and an agreement is not reached, PCMC reserves the right to enter into negotiations with the next highest ranked Respondent without the need to repeat the formal solicitation process. 4. Final selection and subsequent agreements are subject to approval by the Housing Authority and/or City Council in a public meeting. SELECTION CRITERIA The following is a guide to the criteria that will be used in evaluating development teams: 11 1. Development Team Characteristics a. Quality and completeness of information submitted in response to this RFQ; b. Evaluation of past projects and experience; c. Experience with planning and implementing similar urban infill projects; d. Experience with designing and developing mixed-income affordable housing projects; e. Experience with affordable housing financing mechanisms, including low income housing tax credits; f. Experience in effective property management of affordable housing, market rate housing, commercial space, parking facilities, and other components of urban infill projects; g. Evaluation of ownership structure and experience of key members; and h. Capacity to undertake and complete the Project in a timely manner. 2. Financial Capability a. Demonstrated ability to secure funding, including experience with public-private partnerships; b. Degree of capitalization as an entity; c. Degree to which the entity is leveraged; and d. Verifiable likelihood that sources and terms are realistic and accessible. SECTION IV – DESIGN REVIEW AND PERMITTING During the period specified in the DA, the Developer will work with PCMC to finalize the Project’s design, including architectural, urban design and landscape architectural elements. Developer is also subject to PCMC’s standard processes and requirements for obtaining the required development approvals/permits included but not limited to the following: Plat Amendments, Master Planned Development (or Affordable Master Planned Development), Conditional Use Permits, and Building Permits. SECTION V – PCMC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS Given the current status of the Property—as well as the public benefits envisioned for the Property’s redevelopment—PCMC is willing to consider providing specific resources to fill the gap and assist the project in achieving financial viability for a Project that meets a high level of community benefit as outlined in Exhibit B: Project Requirements and Preferences Tools and resources may include the following: 1. Long-Term Ground Lease: PCMC expects to provide a long-term ground lease retaining PCMC ownership of the land in perpetuity. By entering into a long-term (50 year or more) lease with PCMC, Developer receives the right to build and own the Project improvements without having to purchase the land. However, in the alternative, PCMC may consider a purchase agreement for Developer to purchase the land and thus convey title of the Property to Developer. 2. Rental Subsidies: PCMC may consider a below-market lease rates to decrease the overall development cost for a Project that results in a high number of affordable units with rental rates between 30% - 50% AMI for Summit County. 12 3. Fee Reductions/Waivers: PCMC may consider requests to reduce or waive certain fees associated with approvals/permits needed for the Project, particularly for affordable units, in accordance with adopted Municipal Code and state law. 4. Soil Remediation Assistance: PCMC may provide assistance in the remediation of any contaminated soils on the site. 5. Energy Goal Loan: PCMC may provide grants or loans to help meet the City’s energy goals. 6. Loans/Financing: PCMC could have the capability to help provide funding through various lending options such as: City-backed loans, tax-exempt financing, or conduit financing. 7. Direct Financial Participation: For proposals that exceed the Projects Requirements and Preferences identified in Exhibit B, PCMC may consider direct financial participation, including grant matches orland value, in accordance with applicable state and local regulations and policies. SECTION VI – MISCELLANEOUS All questions shall be submitted in writing no later than 2:00 p.m. on Friday, May 21, 2021, to: jglidden@parkcity.org. Final modification or addenda will be made on the website by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, May 24, 2021. All submittals shall be public records in accordance with government records regulations (“GRAMA”) unless otherwise designated by the applicant pursuant to UCA § 63G-2-309, as amended. All proposals shall remain vaild for sixty (60) days from submittal. PCMC reserves the right to change any dates or deadlines. It is PCMC’s policy, subject to Federal and State and local procurement laws, to make reasonable attempts to support Park City businesses by purchasing goods and services through local vendors and service providers, PCMC reserves the right to cancel or modify the terms of this RFQ and/or the project at any time and for any reason preceding contract award and reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals submitted pursuant to this RFQ. PCMC will provide respondents written notice of any cancellation and/or modification. Furthermore, the City shall have the right to waive any informality or technicality in proposals received when in the best interest of the City. PCMC reserves the right to change any dates or deadlines. No proposal shall be accepted from, or contract awarded to, any person, firm or corporation that is in arrears to the City, upon debt or contract or that is a defaulter, as surety or otherwise, upon any obligation to the City, or that may be deemed irresponsible or unreliable by the City. Offerors may be required to submit satisfactory evidence that they have the necessary financial resources to perform and complete the work outlined in this RFQ. SECTION VII – PCMC AND CITY NON-LIABILITY & RELATED MATTERS 1. No Representation or Warranties - All facts and opinions stated herein, any additional data including, but not limited to statistical and economic data and projections, are based on available information, and no representation or warranty is made with respect thereto by the Housing Authority or PCMC. 13 2. Building Permits, Zoning Variances, and Financial Viability - PCMC through the lease or sale of the Property in no way guarantees or warrants the issuance of building permits, zoning variances, or the financial viability of the Project. 3. Housing Authority/PCMC Discretion, Non-Liability, Waivers, and Hold Harmless - Developers acknowledge by submitting information and Responses to PCMC that PCMC does not undertake and shall have no liability with respect to the development program, the RFQ, and responses thereto or with respect to any matters related to any submission by a Respondent. By submitting a Response to the RFQ, the Respondent releases PCMC and the City from all liability with respect to the development program, the RFQ, and all matters related thereto, covenants not to sue regarding such matters, and agrees to hold PCMC harmless from any claims made by the Respondent or anyone claiming by, through, or under the Respondent in connection therewith. SECTION VIII – EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Property Description Exhibit B: Project Requirements and Preferences 14 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Property Address: 1875 Homestake Road, Park City, Utah Parcel Number: YARD-B-1AM-X) Total Acreage: 1.86 Zoning: General Commercial Zoning District Legal Description: LOT B THE YARD SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDED; ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT ON FILE IN THE SUMMIT COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE. CONT 1.86 AC. 2408-4 15 EXHIBIT B PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND PREFERENCES The Project Requirements and Preferences are provided below to help articulate PCMC’s vision for redevelopment of the Property. PCMC is willing to provide financial incentives for a Project that demonstrates a high level of consistency with the Requirements and Preferences stated below. Refer to Section V – PCMC Development Tools for additional information. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Developer will partner with PCMC to plan and construct a vertical mixed-use project that includes the following: • A residential component with a minimum of eighty percent (80%) of the units offered at affordable rates that meets the standards of Housing Resolution 05-2021. Rents for these households should average sixty percent (60%) of the area median income (“AMI”). Affordable units will have a minimum affordability period of fifty (50) years; • A parking strategy that provides the most effiecent and cost-effective options but maximizes the number of units on the site as allowed by code; • A site plan and building design consistent with PCMC’s Land Management Code that promotes the pillars of the Park City 2020 Vision: Equity and Affordability, Environmental Leadership, Authentic Local Culture, and Transportation Innovation; • A site plan that includes elements of walkability and connectivity to other areas of the district, to be publicly-accessible and privately owned and maintained; • A high level of concern for architectural and mountain town design principles that meets the PCMC Land Management Code; • Maximization of allowable density in a manner compatible with neighboring properties; and • Constructed to promote enduring, healthy, and energy-efficient building(s) that utilize sustainable, environmentally friendly materials and methods. PREFERENCES In addition to the Minimum Requirements listed above, the City seeks a development partner interested in maximizing the public benefit derived from the Project. As such, Responses from developers with experience in the following areas will receive priority during the selection process: • Devceloping more deeply affordable housing beyond the minimum requirements stated above, with a preference for maximizing housing affordable to households at or below fifty percent (50%) AMI; • Housing that includes robust resident services programming, with a programming and operations plan provided; • A project that is constructed to meet the City’s Net-Zero energy requirements; and • A parking plan that promotes accessibility beyond minimum code requirements, supports alternative modes of transportation, and contributes to reducing residents' reliance on personal vehicle use. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: February 8, 2022 Title: Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget Amendment Presenter: Ben Billingsley Attachment(s): Provide a listing of attachments, and any necessary background if the item is not self-explanatory - Resolution 04-2022 - Proposed Amended FY22 Budget Possible Motion: I move to approve Resolution 04-2022 amending the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget Summary: State Code allows for budgets to be amended as needed following a properly noticed public hearing. The following is a narrative guide to the budgetary amendment. Line-item adjustments have been grouped to allow the consolidation of line-by-line explanation. Community Stage Acquisition A community stage has been discussed in recent months, and Grand County has requested a cost share with the City. Grand County has proposed the management of the stage, the terms of which will be forthcoming in an ILA. This amendment will allow the County to move forward with placing the order, with hopes the stage will be delivered in time for fall events. Return of Walnut Lane Bond Proceeds These entries complete the return of the series 2021 Sales Tax Revenue Bond. Shooting Range Environmental Assessment The first step to completing the lead management plan required by the shooting range lease is the completion of the environmental assessment. Transit Fund Contribution Grand County had committed to a 5-year contribution to the transit program. This was initially anticipated as an up-front contribution but will instead be spread out over the 5-year pilot program. 400 E Bridge Construction The financial details of the UDOT arrangement for the Pack Creek Bridge widening approved by the Council on November 9, 2021, have been finalized, and these items address that project. Return of Hotspot Funding for Parking Structure During the pre-construction phase of the UDOT Hotspot funding, UDOT remitted $1MM to the city to cover the initial phase of the project. Total design costs incurred were $257k, and UDOT has asked for the return of those funds. Fund Balance Transfer Several of the above listed items required General Fund contributions. Sales tax revenues continue to trend approximately 30% over budget, adjusted for seasonality. Instead of building in a growth factor for revenue, a reduction in fund balance contribution was made. 1 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 04-2022 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moab adopted the fiscal year 2021-2022 budget by resolution 22-2021 and amended by resolution 35-2021; and WHEREAS, the City may amend the adopted budget as needed prior to the last day of the fiscal year as outlined by UCA 10-6-127; and WHEREAS, at a meeting duly noticed and held on February 8, 2022, a public hearing was held for the purpose of receiving public input for the budget amendment; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab has proposed to amend the 2021-2022 fiscal year budget for the various funds as summarized below and included in Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE 2021-2022 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET SHALL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: Fund Amended Revenue Amended Expenditure 10 - General Fund $14,733,527 $14,733,527 21 – Class C Road Fund $959,629 $959,629 23 - Recreation Fund $1,539,858 $1,539,858 28 – Trails Fund $30,000 $30,000 30 – Housing Fund $6,986,337 $6,986,337 31 – Debt Service Fund $7,115,497 $7,115,497 41 – Capital Projects Fund $2,842,683 $2,842,683 51 - Water Fund $1,979,461 $1,488,260 52 – Sewer Fund $2,355,987 $2,335,040 53 – Storm Water Fund $285,190 $149,374 55 – Parking and Transit Fund $557,500 $557,500 61 – Health Insurance Fund $2,462,347 $2,462,347 PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council, this 8th day of February 2022. By:__________________________ _________________ Joette Langianese, Mayor Date Attest: By:___________________________ ________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder Date FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 7/1/2020 7/1/2021 6/30/2022 10 General Fund 6/30/2021 12/31/2021 4 Change In Net Position Revenue: Taxes SALES & USE TAXES 10-310-300 2,803,004 1,713,950 2,633,932 65% 2,633,932 RAP TAXES 10-310-350 91,789 240,867 319,541 75% 319,541 FRANCHISE TAXES 10-310-314 106,011 54,861 144,707 38% 144,707 HIGHWAY TAXES 10-310-315 1,136,233 730,337 1,087,020 67% 1,087,020 TRANSIENT ROOM TAXES 10-310-316 1,578,634 1,238,732 1,589,647 78% 1,589,647 RESORT COMMUNITY TAXES 10-310-317 5,649,771 3,795,312 5,623,139 67% 5,623,139 ENERGY TAXES 10-310-318 222,462 109,070 168,308 65% 168,308 Total Taxes 11,587,906 7,883,130 11,566,294 68% 11,566,294 Licenses and permits INACTIVE 10-320-321 90 - - 0% - FLAT BUSINESS LICENSES 10-320-326 23,289 4,232 12,000 35% 12,000 SPECIAL EVENT LICENSES 10-320-327 10,507 4,790 6,000 80% 6,000 SIGN PERMITS 10-325-300 88 42 200 21% 200 BUILDING PERMITS - CITY 10-325-301 57,020 16,754 40,000 42% 40,000 BUILDING PERMITS - COMMERCIAL 10-325-302 60,856 52,839 30,000 176% 30,000 1% BLDG PERMIT CHARGE 10-325-303 281 41 500 8% 500 PLAN CHECK FEES 10-325-304 42,219 44,051 - 0% - PLANNING & ZONING ALL OTHER FE 10-325-307 20,257 25,851 10,000 259% 10,000 OTHER LICENSES & PERMITS 10-325-309 380 101 - 0% - Total Licenses and permits 214,987 148,701 98,700 151% 98,700 Intergovernmental revenue PSafety - STATE LIQUOR FUND AL 10-335-380 28,173 28,465 28,000 102% 28,000 PSafety - MISC STATE GRANTS 10-350-355 9,631 - - 0% - PSafety - VICTIM ADVOCATE GRAN 10-350-358 63,814 25,538 58,115 44% 58,115 PSafety - VICTIM ADVOCATE 10-350-361 4,940 - - 0% - SAN JUAN CO. CONTRIBUTION 10-369-374 5,000 - 5,000 0% 5,000 GRAND COUNTY CONTRIBUTION 10-371-370 77,948 - 38,974 0% 38,974 Total Intergovernmental revenue 189,506 54,003 130,089 42% 130,089 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Charges for services SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY DEPTS 10-340-301 2,000 - 2,000 0% 2,000 SPECIAL EVENT SERVICES BY CITY 10-340-302 - - - 0% - SPECIAL SERVICES BY ENGINEERIN 10-340-303 53,726 - 35,000 0% 35,000 SPECIAL SERVICES BY TREASURER 10-340-304 - - - 0% - GARBAGE BILLING / COLLECTION 10-345-320 293,906 34,439 84,000 41% 84,000 REFUSE COLLECTION CHARGES 10-345-330 1,047,614 636,780 1,200,000 53% 1,200,000 RECYLING COLLECTION CHARGES 10-345-340 100,703 48,954 60,000 82% 60,000 PSafety - ANIMAL SHELTER FEES 10-350-330 5,390 3,380 6,000 56% 6,000 PSafety - ANIMAL SHELTER INTER 10-350-340 11,134 10,353 14,500 71% 14,500 PSafety - SECURITY SERVICES 10-350-351 11,366 3,144 2,000 157% 2,000 PSafety - SPECIAL EVENT SERVIC 10-350-352 - (1,300) 8,000 -16% 8,000 PSafety - RECORDS FEES 10-350-353 1,435 1,912 1,000 191% 1,000 PSafety - WITNESS FEES 10-350-354 74 - 100 0% 100 Total Charges for services 1,527,348 737,661 1,412,600 52% 1,412,600 Sustainability SUSTAINABILITY GRANTS AND DONA 10-369-304 - - - 0% - SUSTAINABILITY MONUMENT COST S 10-369-306 - - - 0% - Total Sustainability - - - 0% - Fines and forfeitures CODE ENFORCEMENT FINES 10-325-306 6,420 650 - 0% - PSafety - FINES & PENALTIES 10-350-360 37,786 11,598 40,000 29% 40,000 Late and NSF Fees 10-350-363 - (50) - 0% - PSafety - FORFEITURES 10-371-372 (1,776) - - 0% - Total Fines and forfeitures 42,429 12,198 40,000 30% 40,000 Interest INTEREST INCOME 10-361-360 4,342 - - 0% - INTEREST PTIF 10-361-361 30,113 17,043 20,000 85% 20,000 Total Interest 34,455 17,043 20,000 85% 20,000 Miscellaneous revenue PSafety - DONATIONS 10-350-356 - 500 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes PSafety - EVIDENCE/LOST & FOUN 10-350-357 1,438 - - 0% - RESTITUTION 10-350-359 4,212 - - 0% - PSafety - SEIZED PROPERTY 10-350-362 1,778 - - 0% - PARK RENTALS 10-362-320 12,830 4,500 13,000 35% 13,000 PARK DEPOSITS 10-362-321 (180) (900) - 0% - COVID STIMULUS (CARES/ARPA)10-369-330 1,011,271 315,760 315,760 100% 315,760 FILM COMM - SPONSOR/DONATION 10-362-330 5,000 1,000 4,000 25% 4,000 FILM COMM - SPECIAL EVENT FEES 10-362-364 1,349 - - 0% - FILM COM. - EQUIP RENTAL FEES 10-362-365 200 750 500 150% 500 SALE OF REAL/PERS. PROPERTY 10-364-340 - - 5,000 0% 5,000 INSURANCE REBATE 10-364-341 25,036 - - 0% - INSURANCE INCOME 10-369-370 - 15,720 - 0% - OTHER 10-369-300 67,857 189 17,000 1% 17,000 PSafety - ANIMAL DEPOSITS NON-10-371-373 1,935 475 1,000 48% 1,000 ALLOWANCE ON DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS 10-371-386 - (1,835) - 0% - Total Miscellaneous revenue 1,132,725 337,994 356,260 95% 356,260 Contributions and transfers OVERHEAD PAID FROM STORM WATER 10-390-320 84,186 52,557 105,114 50% 105,114 OVERHEAD PAID FROM SEWER FUND 10-390-330 378,837 236,507 473,013 50% 473,013 OVERHEAD PAID FROM CUL WATER F 10-390-335 391,747 243,228 486,457 50% 486,457 OVERHEAD PAID FROM TRANSIT FUND 10-390-336 - - 45,000 0% 45,000 GENERAL FUND BEG. BALANCE 10-390-340 - - - 0% - Total Contributions and transfers 854,770 532,292 1,109,584 48% 1,109,584 Total Revenue: 15,584,127 9,723,022 14,733,527 66% 14,733,527 Expenditures: General government Attorney Attorney SALARIES & WAGES 10-422-510 138,486 30,320 138,703 22% 138,703 Attorney BENEFITS 10-422-513 51,282 10,382 58,729 18% 58,729 Attorney SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBE 10-422-521 1,551 30 4,185 1% 4,185 Attorney TRAVEL\FOOD 10-422-523 - - 1,000 0% 1,000 Attorney OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPP 10-422-524 418 - 100 0% 100 Attorney PROFESSIONAL & TECH. 10-422-530 32,705 73,161 25,000 293% 25,000 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Attorney PUBLIC DEFENDER 10-422-531 23,353 14,886 24,000 62% 24,000 Attorney PROSECUTION SERVICES 10-422-532 44,187 15,180 37,000 41% 37,000 Attorney EDUCATION 10-422-533 - - 400 0% 400 Total Attorney 291,981 143,959 289,117 50% 289,117 General General EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-416-513 8,490 - - 0% - General OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPL 10-416-524 2,965 1,696 - 0% - General UTILITIES 10-416-527 40,264 20,540 41,000 50% 41,000 General TELEPHONE/INTERNET 10-416-528 51,379 25,578 41,000 62% 41,000 General RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQ 10-416-529 2,891 1,445 - 0% - General INSURANCE 10-416-551 164,441 10,875 141,000 8% 141,000 General COVID19 TESTING 10-416-581 - - - 0% - Total General 270,429 60,135 223,000 27% 223,000 Executive and Central Staff Exec SALARIES & WAGES 10-413-510 172,784 87,542 198,435 44% 198,435 Exec EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-413-513 27,959 13,572 31,291 43% 31,291 Exec SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHI 10-413-521 14,097 66 8,500 1% 8,500 Exec PUBLIC NOTICES 10-413-522 - - - 0% - Exec TRAVEL\FOOD 10-413-523 3,224 4,495 9,600 47% 9,600 Exec OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 10-413-524 35 - - 0% - Exec BLDG/GRDS SUPPL & MAINT 10-413-526 - - - 0% - Exec TELEPHONE 10-413-528 - - - 0% - Exec MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 10-413-530 29 61 500 12% 500 Exec PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SE 10-413-531 775 20,000 130,000 15% 130,000 Exec EDUCATION 10-413-533 149 775 1,000 78% 1,000 Exec OTHER 10-413-535 - - - 0% - Exec SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPP 10-413-546 359 44 2,400 2% 2,400 Total Executive and Central Staff 219,411 126,555 381,726 33% 381,726 Administrative Admin SALARIES & WAGES 10-414-510 404,007 181,906 434,311 42% 434,311 Admin EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-414-513 175,831 73,271 189,405 39% 189,405 Admin OVERTIME 10-414-515 - - 2,500 0% 2,500 Admin UNEMPLOYMENT 10-414-516 11,606 992 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Admin SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSH 10-414-521 3,778 507 7,470 7% 7,470 Admin PUBLIC NOTICES 10-414-522 23,166 9,282 35,300 26% 35,300 Admin TRAVEL\FOOD 10-414-523 8,499 1,904 9,400 20% 9,400 Admin OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIE 10-414-524 2,885 2,719 7,500 36% 7,500 Admin EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTEN 10-414-525 181 - 1,500 0% 1,500 Admin TELEPHONE 10-414-528 2,828 988 2,500 40% 2,500 Admin PROFESSIONAL/TECH. SERVI 10-414-531 63,502 2,373 15,000 16% 15,000 Admin EDUCATION 10-414-533 2,943 2,519 2,500 101% 2,500 Admin OTHER 10-414-535 10,151 4,602 9,500 48% 9,500 Admin SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUP 10-414-546 4,073 1,867 2,300 81% 2,300 Admin GRANT EXPENSES 10-414-575 205,617 - - 0% - Total Administrative 919,066 282,930 719,186 39% 719,186 Recorder Recorder SALARIES & WAGES 10-415-510 150,163 68,872 188,939 36% 188,939 Recorder EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-415-513 91,237 42,129 106,296 40% 106,296 Recorder OVERTIME 10-415-515 - - 1,000 0% 1,000 Recorder UNEMPLOYMENT 10-415-516 256 - - 0% - Recorder SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERS 10-415-521 1,656 180 2,990 6% 2,990 Recorder PUBLIC NOTICES 10-415-522 8,523 3,547 7,500 47% 7,500 Recorder TRAVEL\FOOD 10-415-523 - - 3,400 0% 3,400 Recorder OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPP 10-415-524 3,441 1,753 4,000 44% 4,000 Recorder TELEPHONE 10-415-528 689 284 540 53% 540 Recorder PROFESSIONAL & TECH. 10-415-531 18,431 15,757 25,200 63% 25,200 Recorder EDUCATION 10-415-533 700 - 2,600 0% 2,600 Recorder OTHER 10-415-535 - - 100 0% 100 Recorder SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 10-415-546 1,037 - 1,700 0% 1,700 Recorder COPIER SUPPLIES 10-415-550 3,247 1,463 5,300 28% 5,300 Total Recorder 279,379 133,985 349,565 38% 349,565 Information Technology Info Tech OFFICE EXPENSE & SUP 10-430-524 701 236 1,500 16% 1,500 Info Tech PROF & TECH SERVICES 10-430-531 104,504 52,380 119,060 44% 119,060 Info Tech WEBSITE 10-430-532 5,861 58 10,266 1% 10,266 Info Tech GOOGLE FOR GOVERNMEN 10-430-533 23,096 39,243 21,600 182% 21,600 Info Tech SECURITY APPLIANCE 10-430-534 2,968 - 1,500 0% 1,500 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Info Tech WIFI - ACCESS LICENS 10-430-535 - - 1,500 0% 1,500 Info Tech ANTIVIRUS 10-430-536 5,750 3,150 5,700 55% 5,700 Info Tech DNS MONITORING 10-430-537 4,500 2,250 4,500 50% 4,500 Total Information Technology 147,380 97,316 165,626 59% 165,626 Elections Election PUBLIC NOTICES 10-417-522 - 636 3,000 21% 3,000 Election PROFESSIONAL/TECH - P 10-417-531 - - 7,000 0% 7,000 Election PROFESSIONAL/TECH - G 10-417-532 - 144 7,000 2% 7,000 Election EDUCATION - INITIATIV 10-417-533 - - 500 0% 500 Election PRINTING EXPENSES 10-417-535 - 1,338 500 268% 500 Election ELECTION DINNERS - GE 10-417-537 - 518 - 0% - Total Elections - 2,118 18,000 12% 18,000 Engineering Engineer SALARIES & WAGES 10-419-510 309,847 147,328 302,603 49% 302,603 Engineer BENEFITS 10-419-513 156,981 74,488 174,876 43% 174,876 Engineer OVERTIME 10-419-515 98 - 500 0% 500 Engineer UNEMPLOYMENT 10-419-516 653 - - 0% - Engineer SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBE 10-419-521 7,296 3,712 7,675 48% 7,675 Engineer TRAVEL 10-419-523 - - 1,600 0% 1,600 Engineer OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPP 10-419-524 3,606 1,633 5,300 31% 5,300 Engineer EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAIN 10-419-525 695 475 1,000 48% 1,000 Engineer TELEPHONE 10-419-528 406 - 1,025 0% 1,025 Engineer MONTHLY FUEL - GASCAR 10-419-530 11,387 867 1,500 58% 1,500 Engineer PROFESSIONAL & TECH. 10-419-531 33,166 715 20,000 4% 20,000 Engineer PLAN REVIEW SERVICES 10-419-532 9,857 - - 0% - Engineer EDUCATION 10-419-533 3,274 3,601 7,500 48% 7,500 Engineer OTHER 10-419-535 5 - 200 0% 200 Engineer SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 10-419-546 1,508 - 2,500 0% 2,500 Total Engineering 538,780 232,820 526,279 44% 526,279 Finance Finance SALARIES & WAGES 10-420-510 253,835 112,326 298,854 38% 298,854 Finance EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-420-513 142,665 68,663 204,984 33% 204,984 Finance OVERTIME 10-420-515 - - 1,500 0% 1,500 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Finance SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBER 10-420-521 3,322 2,386 4,360 55% 4,360 Finance TRAVEL 10-420-523 - 736 5,500 13% 5,500 Finance OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPL 10-420-524 12,827 4,940 11,525 43% 11,525 Finance EQUIPMENT SUPPL. & MAI 10-420-525 1,855 300 3,776 8% 3,776 Finance TELEPHONE 10-420-528 972 448 2,500 18% 2,500 Finance PROFESSIONAL & TECH. S 10-420-531 11,833 6,886 10,750 64% 10,750 Finance EDUCATION 10-420-533 638 288 3,500 8% 3,500 Finance BANK HANDLING CHARGES 10-420-536 35,725 23,533 31,000 76% 31,000 Finance SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL S 10-420-546 2,046 250 18,500 1% 18,500 Finance INSURANCE 10-420-551 - - 1,950 0% 1,950 Finance CASH OVER & SHORT 10-420-563 - 0 - 0% - Total Finance 465,718 220,757 598,699 37% 598,699 Human Resources Human Resources SALARIES & WAG 10-411-510 172,885 77,235 166,655 46% 166,655 Human Resources EMPLOYEE BENEF 10-411-513 88,939 39,930 97,936 41% 97,936 Human Resources OVERTIME 10-411-515 720 - 2,000 0% 2,000 Human Resources SUBSCRIPTIONS 10-411-521 2,776 897 1,000 90% 1,000 Human Resources PUBLIC NOTICES 10-411-522 1,664 3,002 4,000 75% 4,000 Human Resources TRAVEL\FOOD 10-411-523 - - 2,500 0% 2,500 HR OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 10-411-524 521 214 4,000 5% 4,000 Human Resources EQUIP./SUPPLIE 10-411-525 - - 12,900 0% 12,900 Human Resources TELEPHONE 10-411-528 452 508 1,200 42% 1,200 HR RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPME 10-411-529 - - 2,900 0% 2,900 Human Resources PROF & TECH. S 10-411-531 27,911 60,486 102,500 59% 102,500 Human Resources EDUCATION 10-411-533 401 - 4,000 0% 4,000 Human Resources OTHER 10-411-535 38 20 1,000 2% 1,000 Human Resources SPECIAL DEPT S 10-411-546 3,076 - 3,050 0% 3,050 Human Resources COPIER SUPPLIE 10-411-550 3,385 1,343 1,500 90% 1,500 Total Human Resources 302,768 183,634 407,141 45% 407,141 Police Police SALARIES & WAGES 10-421-510 1,212,064 510,853 1,267,301 40% 1,267,301 Police MOVIE\SECURITY WAGES 10-421-511 7,173 (660) - 0% - Police EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-421-513 789,656 340,205 871,165 39% 871,165 Police OTHER BENEFITS- U/ALLOW 10-421-514 17,840 12,240 17,280 71% 17,280 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Police OVERTIME 10-421-515 33,920 11,853 45,000 26% 45,000 Police UNEMPLOYMENT 10-421-516 847 - - 0% - Police OFFICER EQUIP/PAYROLL D 10-421-518 - - - 0% - Police SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS 10-421-521 26,748 420 28,935 1% 28,935 Police TRAVEL\FOOD 10-421-523 9,173 3,726 25,000 15% 25,000 Police OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLI 10-421-524 5,191 2,626 10,000 26% 10,000 Police EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAIN 10-421-525 70,510 22,408 40,000 56% 40,000 Police BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAIN 10-421-526 - 400 10,000 4% 10,000 Police TELEPHONE 10-421-528 14,487 6,071 22,416 27% 22,416 Police RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQU 10-421-529 7,415 1,760 83,484 2% 83,484 Police MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 10-421-530 38,992 21,794 60,000 36% 60,000 Police PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SE 10-421-531 7,763 3,244 28,300 11%15,000 43,300 Environmental Assessment - Shooting range Police EDUCATION 10-421-533 7,422 1,306 20,000 7% 20,000 Police DISPATCH SERVICES 10-421-536 115,981 65,643 128,100 51% 128,100 Police SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SU 10-421-546 12,497 533 22,365 2% 22,365 Police VEST REPLACEMENT 10-421-548 - - 8,000 0% 8,000 Police INITIAL UNIFORM GEAR 10-421-549 3,825 3,010 - 0% - Police SCHOOL EQUIP/ SUPPLIES 10-421-573 - - - 0% - Police MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 10-421-574 68,766 107,150 - 0% - Police JAG GRANT EXPENSES 10-421-575 2,621 3,689 - 0% - Total Police 2,452,891 1,118,270 2,687,346 42% 2,702,346 Victims's Advocate Victims's Advocate SALARIES & 10-423-510 58,780 26,505 81,362 33% 81,362 Victims's Advocate EMPLOYEE BE 10-423-513 24,177 11,854 28,591 41% 28,591 Victims's Advocate OVERTIME 10-423-515 - - - 0% - Victims's Adv SUBSCRIPTIONS/ME 10-423-521 - 38 800 5% 800 Victims's Advocate TRAVEL 10-423-523 - 70 1,000 7% 1,000 Victims's Advocate OFFICE SUPP 10-423-524 4,499 3,028 2,000 151% 2,000 Victims's Advocate EQUIP/SUPPL 10-423-525 - 804 - 0% - Victims's Advocate TELEPHONE 10-423-528 675 213 600 36% 600 Victims Advocate MONTHLY FUEL 10-423-530 792 547 1,000 55% 1,000 Victims's Advocate PROF/TECH S 10-423-531 - - - 0% - Victims's Advocate EDUCATION 10-423-533 - - 2,000 0% 2,000 Victims's Advocate OTHER 10-423-535 2,731 557 3,500 16% 3,500 Victims's Advocate MACHINERY &10-423-574 - - - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Total Victims's Advocate 91,654 43,617 120,853 36% 120,853 Beer Tax Funds Eligible Expenses Beer Tax EQUIPMENT 10-425-574 19,176 - 28,178 0% 28,178 Total Beer Tax Funds Eligible Expenses 19,176 - 28,178 0% 28,178 Animal control Animal Ctl SALARIES & WAGES 10-426-510 179,416 79,331 188,987 42% 188,987 Animal Ctl EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-426-513 105,737 46,909 112,948 42% 112,948 Animal Ctl OTHER BENEFIT - U/A 10-426-514 25 3,360 4,089 82% 4,089 Animal Ctl OVERTIME 10-426-515 9,570 5,862 6,000 98% 6,000 Animal Ctl SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEM 10-426-521 - - 735 0% 735 Animal Ctl TRAVEL\FOOD 10-426-523 110 - 4,000 0% 4,000 Animal Ctl OFFICE EXPENSE & SU 10-426-524 (18) - - 0% - Animal Ctl EQUIP-SUPPL.&MAINT 10-426-525 2,123 2,214 10,000 22% 10,000 Animal Ctl UTILITIES 10-426-527 8,425 2,742 12,000 23% 12,000 Animal Ctl TELEPHONE 10-426-528 4,416 1,715 4,092 42% 4,092 Animal Ctl MONTHLY FUEL - GASC 10-426-530 4,421 3,334 6,290 53% 6,290 Animal Ctl PROFESSIONAL & TECH 10-426-531 - 1,573 1,000 157% 1,000 Animal Ctl EDUCATION 10-426-533 705 300 2,000 15% 2,000 Animal Ctl OTHER 10-426-535 - - - 0% - Animal Ctl SPECIAL DEPARTMENTA 10-426-546 594 92 6,000 2% 6,000 Animal Ctl GRANT EXPENSES 10-426-550 8,356 2,250 - 0% - Animal Ctl MACHINERY & EQUIPME 10-426-574 - - 4,735 0% 4,735 Total Animal control 323,880 149,682 362,876 41% 362,876 Streets Streets SALARIES & WAGES 10-440-510 245,302 105,408 252,872 42% 252,872 Streets EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-440-513 184,734 74,157 215,100 34% 215,100 Streets OVERTIME 10-440-515 433 124 2,000 6% 2,000 Streets UNEMPLOYMENT 10-440-516 10,321 - 2,000 0% 2,000 Streets SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBER 10-440-521 582 185 1,000 19% 1,000 Streets TRAVEL 10-440-523 497 - 2,500 0% 2,500 Streets OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPL 10-440-524 - - 500 0% 500 Streets EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAI 10-440-525 570 1,210 2,500 48% 2,500 Streets BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAI 10-440-526 643 - 1,100 0% 1,100 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Streets UTILITIES 10-440-527 15,912 6,120 20,000 31% 20,000 Streets TELEPHONE 10-440-528 670 151 2,640 6% 2,640 Streets RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQ 10-440-529 - - 600 0% 600 Streets PROFESSIONAL & TECH. S 10-440-531 9,771 3,187 32,500 10% 32,500 Streets EDUCATION 10-440-533 - - 5,500 0% 5,500 Streets OTHER 10-440-535 37 - 500 0% 500 Streets STREET LIGHTS 10-440-542 81,053 37,387 100,000 37% 100,000 Streets SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL S 10-440-546 1,312 209 6,000 3% 6,000 Total Streets 551,837 228,137 647,312 35% 647,312 Facilities Facilities SALARIES & WAGES 10-443-510 259,518 138,035 268,440 51% 268,440 Facilities EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-443-513 149,457 92,671 198,680 47% 198,680 Facilities OVERTIME 10-443-515 - 215 500 43% 500 Facilities UNEMPLOYMENT 10-443-516 (2,331) - - 0% - Facilities SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEM 10-443-521 - - 300 0% 300 Facilities TRAVEL 10-443-523 - 263 900 29% 900 Facilities OFFICE EXPENSE & SU 10-443-524 61 - 300 0% 300 Facilities EQUIP SUPPLIES & MA 10-443-525 515 57 5,300 1% 5,300 Facilities BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL & M 10-443-526 13,921 7,822 28,900 27% 28,900 Facilities - CITY CENTER 10-443-536 5,321 196 - 0% - Facilities - MARC 10-443-537 922 149 - 0% - Facilities - CENTER STREET GYM 10-443-538 409 14 - 0% - Facilities UTILITIES 10-443-527 6,448 2,510 5,184 48% 5,184 Facilities TELEPHONE 10-443-528 2,474 1,339 3,300 41% 3,300 Facilities RENT OF PROPERTY OR 10-443-529 - - 800 0% 800 Facilities MONTHLY FUEL 10-443-530 3,482 1,670 3,000 56% 3,000 Facilities PROFESSIONAL & TECH 10-443-531 15,007 11,244 19,300 58% 19,300 Facilities EDUCATION 10-443-533 40 70 800 9% 800 Facilities OTHER 10-443-535 35 - - 0% - Facilities SPECIAL DEPARTMENTA 10-443-546 484 31 5,800 1% 5,800 Total Facilities 455,763 256,286 541,504 47% 541,504 Safety Safety SALARIES & WAGES 10-441-510 10,524 4,967 52,517 9% 52,517 Safety BENEFITS 10-441-513 6,349 2,987 44,705 7% 44,705 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Safety OVERTIME 10-441-515 - - - 0% - Safety SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS 10-441-521 543 30 500 6% 500 Safety TRAVEL 10-441-523 585 - 1,500 0% 1,500 Safety EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTE 10-441-525 3,217 - 3,500 0% 3,500 Safety TELEPHONE 10-441-528 - - 750 0% 750 Safety MONTHLY FUEL 10-441-530 - - 1,000 0% 1,000 Safety PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SE 10-441-531 5,271 3,377 13,000 26% 13,000 Safety EDUCATION 10-441-533 - 6,790 11,000 62% 11,000 Safety OTHER 10-441-535 724 1,868 4,000 47% 4,000 Safety SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SU 10-441-546 37,279 9,922 19,640 51% 19,640 Safety SAFETY EQUIPMENT 10-441-575 8,977 773 33,000 2% 33,000 Total Safety 73,470 30,713 185,112 17% 185,112 Vehicle Maintenance Vehicle Maintenance SALARIES &10-444-510 53,812 34,269 71,073 48% 71,073 Vehicle Maintenance - EMPLOYEE 10-444-513 33,920 20,729 50,832 41% 50,832 Vehicle Maintenance OVERTIME 10-444-515 - - - 0% - Vehicle Maintenance SUB & MEMB 10-444-521 2,215 2,195 2,300 95% 2,300 Vehicle Maintenance TRAVEL 10-444-523 - - 2,000 0% 2,000 Vehicle Maintenance EQUIP/SUPP 10-444-525 6,739 4,245 45,000 9% 45,000 Vehicle Maintenance EQUIP MAIN 10-444-551 9,893 585 - 0% - Veh Maint EQUIP MAINT STREETS 10-444-552 9,258 5,639 - 0% - Vehicle Maint EQUIP MAINT - FA 10-444-553 1,824 - - 0% - Fleet BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL & MAINT 10-444-526 35 39 3,000 1% 3,000 Vehicle Maintenance TELEPHONE 10-444-528 630 272 750 36% 750 Vehicle Maintenance RENT OF EQ 10-444-529 - - 500 0% 500 Vehicle Maintenance MONTHLY FU 10-444-530 1,217 744 2,000 37% 2,000 Vehicle Maintenance PROF & TEC 10-444-531 1,208 113 4,000 3% 4,000 Vehicle Maintenance EDUCATION 10-444-533 - - 1,000 0% 1,000 Vehicle Maintenance OTHER 10-444-535 189 12 500 2% 500 Veh Maint SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIE 10-444-546 1,940 1,426 11,000 13% 11,000 Total Vehicle Maintenance 122,880 70,267 193,955 36% 193,955 Sanitation Sanitation PROFESSIONAL & TECH 10-442-531 1,207,443 535,146 1,200,000 45% 1,200,000 Sanitation PROF&TECH RECYCLE 10-442-532 95,294 40,800 100,000 41% 100,000 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Total Sanitation 1,302,737 575,946 1,300,000 44% 1,300,000 PW Admin PW Admin SALARIES & WAGES 10-445-510 165,363 53,752 116,357 46% 116,357 PW Admin EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-445-513 79,560 24,472 51,187 48% 51,187 PW Admin OVERTIME 10-445-515 - - - 0% - PW Admin SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBE 10-445-521 528 305 700 44% 700 PW Admin TRAVEL 10-445-523 - - 1,100 0% 1,100 PW Admin OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPP 10-445-524 3,401 1,468 6,400 23% 6,400 PW Admin UTILITIES 10-445-527 14,112 5,652 18,500 31% 18,500 PW Admin TELEPHONE 10-445-528 1,219 593 1,820 33% 1,820 PW Admin RENT OF PROPERTY OR E 10-445-529 3,165 1,200 3,200 38% 3,200 PW Admin MONTHLY FUEL - GASCAR 10-445-530 - - 1,000 0% 1,000 PW Admin PROFESSIONAL & TECH. 10-445-531 155 - 1,000 0% 1,000 PW Admin EDUCATION 10-445-533 95 - 1,000 0% 1,000 PW Admin OTHER 10-445-535 20 - 1,000 0% 1,000 PW Admin SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 10-445-546 3,501 571 - 0% - Total PW Admin 271,119 88,014 203,264 43% 203,264 Parks O&M Parks O&M SALARIES & WAGES 10-451-510 348,971 158,864 353,335 45% 353,335 Parks O&M EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-451-513 195,000 86,446 222,008 39% 222,008 Parks O&M OVERTIME 10-451-515 2,686 - 5,000 0% 5,000 Parks O&M UNEMPLOYMENT 10-451-516 (2,024) - - 0% - Parks O&M SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMB 10-451-521 590 38 1,020 4% 1,020 Parks O&M TRAVEL 10-451-523 3,279 1,503 1,900 79% 1,900 Parks O&M OFFICE EXPENSE & SUP 10-451-524 - 45 - 0% - Parks O&M EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & M 10-451-525 207 1,563 3,000 52% 3,000 Parks O&M BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & M 10-451-526 24,220 15,053 21,750 69% 21,750 Parks O&M UTILITIES 10-451-527 66,316 28,889 88,700 33% 88,700 Park O&M Garbage and Recycling 10-451-571 17,078 7,674 - 0% - Parks O&M TELEPHONE 10-451-528 5,001 1,999 10,735 19% 10,735 Parks O&M RENTALS 10-451-529 - 1,325 750 177% 750 Parks O&M MONTHLY FUEL - GASCA 10-451-530 14,943 6,762 20,000 34% 20,000 Parks O&M PROFESSIONAL & TECH.10-451-531 2,274 3,336 28,750 12% 28,750 Parks O&M EDUCATION 10-451-533 420 430 1,250 34% 1,250 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Parks O&M OTHER 10-451-535 - - 750 0% 750 Parks O&M SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 10-451-546 4,873 3,169 19,200 17% 19,200 Parks O&M PARK IMPROVEMENTS 10-451-573 221 - 5,250 0% 5,250 Total Parks O&M 684,055 317,096 783,398 40% 783,398 Inspections Inspection SALARIES & WAGES 10-424-510 84,065 36,627 80,549 45% 80,549 Inspection BENEFITS 10-424-513 55,523 24,634 57,120 43% 57,120 Inspection OVERTIME 10-424-515 12,641 3,878 13,000 30% 13,000 Inspection SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEM 10-424-521 809 130 1,000 13% 1,000 Inspection TRAVEL 10-424-523 - - 1,500 0% 1,500 Inspection OFFICE EXPENSE & SU 10-424-524 127 - 1,000 0% 1,000 Inspection TELEPHONE 10-424-528 994 494 1,100 45% 1,100 Inspection MONTHLY FUEL 10-424-530 494 332 750 44% 750 Inspection PROFESSIONAL & TECH 10-424-531 30,084 13,016 20,000 65% 20,000 Inspection EDUCATION 10-424-533 264 112 1,000 11% 1,000 Inspection SPECIAL DEPARTMENTA 10-424-546 850 444 1,500 30% 1,500 Total Inspections 185,850 79,668 178,519 45% 178,519 Planning Planning SALARIES & WAGES 10-418-510 302,244 149,737 428,265 35% 428,265 Planning EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-418-513 150,386 71,474 194,051 37% 194,051 Planning OVERTIME 10-418-515 - - 2,500 0% 2,500 Planning UNEMPLOYMENT 10-418-516 466 - - 0% - Planning SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBE 10-418-521 6,206 3,491 5,400 65% 5,400 Planning TRAVEL 10-418-523 - 290 8,500 3% 8,500 Planning OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPP 10-418-524 3,179 1,488 11,768 13% 11,768 Planning EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MA 10-418-525 - - - 0% - Planning TELEPHONE 10-418-528 1,617 714 480 149% 480 Planning RENTAL 10-418-529 3,159 1,316 - 0% - Planning MONTHLY FUEL - GASCAR 10-418-530 - - - 0% - Planning PROFESSIONAL & TECH. 10-418-531 10,781 2,657 40,000 7% 40,000 Planning EDUCATION 10-418-533 - 60 8,000 1% 8,000 Planning OTHER 10-418-535 112 - 400 0% 400 Planning ABATEMENT 10-418-536 4,920 - - 0% - Planning SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 10-418-546 3,605 - 1,102 0% 1,102 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Total Planning 486,675 231,228 700,466 33% 700,466 Film Commission Film Comm SALARIES & WAGES 10-428-510 68,888 31,775 34,528 92% 34,528 Film Comm EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10-428-513 28,459 13,231 14,770 90% 14,770 Film Comm OVERTIME 10-428-515 610 - 1,250 0% 1,250 Film Comm UNEMPLOYMENT 10-428-516 (235) - - 0% - Film Comm SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEM 10-428-521 7,052 2,830 3,000 94% 3,000 Film Comm ADVERTISING 10-428-522 60 4,626 6,250 74% 6,250 Film Comm MARKETING 10-428-536 249 47 - 0% - Film Comm PROMO MATERIALS 10-428-537 1,977 - - 0% - Film Comm TRAVEL 10-428-523 - 2,475 7,000 35% 7,000 Film Comm OFFICE EXPENSE & SU 10-428-524 195 82 500 16% 500 Film Comm EQUIP./SUPPLIES & M 10-428-525 - 33 250 13% 250 Film Comm TELEPHONE 10-428-528 574 285 325 88% 325 Film Comm MONTHLY FUEL - GASC 10-428-530 446 135 300 45% 300 Film Comm PROFESSIONAL & TECH 10-428-531 - 550 750 73% 750 Film Comm EDUCATION 10-428-533 - - 500 0% 500 Film Comm OTHER 10-428-535 168 69 500 14% 500 Film Comm SPECIAL DEPARTMENTA 10-428-546 1,778 56 1,000 6% 1,000 Film Comm MACHINERY & EQUIPME 10-428-574 - - 500 0% 500 Film Comm SPECIAL PROJECTS 10-428-575 3,169 6,593 4,350 152% 4,350 Total Film Commission 113,391 62,787 75,773 83% 75,773 Community Contributions Com Contrib - COMMUNITY ORGANI 10-460-501 - - 55,000 0% 55,000 Com Contrib - MOAB INFORMATION 10-460-505 - 10,000 10,000 100% 10,000 Com Contrib - ARTS PROMOTION 10-460-526 - - 7,000 0% 7,000 Com Contrib - SHELTER SERVICES 10-460-575 10,000 - 10,000 0% 10,000 Com Contrib - STUDENT OF MONTH 10-460-578 193 - - 0% - Com Contrib - GRAND COUNTY 10-460-584 19,332 - 23,200 0%80,000 103,200 Contribution for stage acquisition Total Community Contributions 29,525 10,000 105,200 10% 185,200 Sustainability Sustainability SALARIES & WAGE 10-454-510 16,890 38,755 87,200 44% 87,200 Sustainability EMPLOYEE BENEFI 10-454-513 5,342 13,263 22,721 58% 22,721 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Sustainability UNEMPLOYMENT 10-454-516 12,042 1,361 - 0% - Sustainability SUBSCRIPTIONS 10-454-521 1,741 4,138 6,760 61% 6,760 Sustainability TRAVEL\FOOD 10-454-523 - - 1,500 0% 1,500 Sustainability OFFICE EXPENSE 10-454-524 - 84 1,500 6% 1,500 Sustainability TELEPHONE 10-454-528 157 194 - 0% - Sustain PROF/TECH. SERVICE 10-454-531 29,167 - - 0% - Sustainability EDUCATION 10-454-533 - - 2,100 0% 2,100 Sustainability PROJECTS 10-454-570 - 4,717 7,500 63% 7,500 Sustainability GRANT EXPENSES 10-454-575 - - 30,000 0% 30,000 Total Sustainability 65,337 62,511 159,281 39% 159,281 Transfers and contributions out TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE FUND 10-480-831 109,714 47,631 95,261 50% 95,261 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJ. FUND 10-480-861 158,623 324,556 890,183 36%370,000 1,260,183 400 E Bridge Contribution TRANSFER TO TRAILS FUND 10-480-871 220,000 15,000 30,000 50% 30,000 TRANSFER - RECREATION FUND 10-480-886 1,994,014 357,708 730,416 49% 730,416 TRANSFER TO GF ASSIGNED/RESTRI 10-480-896 - - 319,541 0% 319,541 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECTS 10-480-897 524,676 - - 0% - TRANSFER TO COMM DEV FUND 10-480-898 78,605 - - 0% - TRANSFER TO TRANSIT AND PARKING 10-480-895 - 37,500 37,500 100% 37,500 TRANSFER TO FUND BALANCE 10-480-899 - - 679,250 0%(465,000) 214,250 400 E Bridge Contribution Total Transfers and contributions out 3,085,632 782,394 2,782,151 28% 2,687,151 Total Expenditures: 13,750,784 5,590,822 14,733,527 38% 14,733,527 Total Change In Net Position 1,833,343 4,132,200 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 21 Class C Road Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Taxes Class C TRANSPORTATION TAX 21-335-370 235,498 155,477 210,795 74% 210,795 Total Taxes 235,498 155,477 210,795 74% 210,795 Intergovernmental revenue Class C CLASS C ROAD FUND 21-335-360 290,058 136,246 250,000 54% 250,000 Total Intergovernmental revenue 290,058 136,246 250,000 54% 250,000 Interest Class C INTEREST INCOME 21-361-300 - - 5,000 0% 5,000 Total Interest - - 5,000 0% 5,000 Contributions and transfers Class C TRANS. FROM EQUITY-B.O 21-395-361 - - 493,834 0% 493,834 Total Contributions and transfers - - 493,834 0% 493,834 Total Revenue: 525,555 291,722 959,629 30% 959,629 Expenditures: Public Works Streets Class C BLDG/GRDS SUPPLIES & M 21-400-526 74 - - 0% - Class C FUEL 21-400-530 12,817 6,835 19,500 35% 19,500 Class C SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL S 21-400-541 14,449 1,291 27,000 5% 27,000 Class C ROADBASE - PATCHING 21-400-558 13,464 2,101 10,000 21% 10,000 Class C ASPHALT 21-400-570 - 2,507 7,500 33% 7,500 Class C OVERLAY 21-400-571 - - 400,000 0% 400,000 Class C CRACK SEALING 21-400-572 - - 5,000 0% 5,000 Class C - SPECIAL PROJECTS 21-400-573 54,910 67,780 305,629 22% 305,629 Class C Sidewalk/Ped Ramp Rep 21-400-576 841 - - 0% - Class C MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 21-400-574 18,745 - 185,000 0% 185,000 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes TRANSFER TO FUND BALANCE 21-400-580 - - - 0% - Total Streets 115,302 80,514 959,629 8% 959,629 Total Expenditures: 115,302 80,514 959,629 8% 959,629 Total Change In Net Position 410,254 211,209 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 23 Recreation Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue GRAND COUNTY - RSSD 23-335-361 125,000 (50,000) 100,000 -50% 100,000 SCHOOL DISTRICT 23-335-363 1,152 - 15,000 0% 15,000 Total Intergovernmental revenue 126,152 (50,000) 115,000 -43% 115,000 Charges for services CASH OVER/SHORT 23-345-318 7 0 - 0% - SUMMER CAMP 23-345-336 - - 4,800 0% 4,800 ADULT SOCCER 23-345-339 - - 2,100 0% 2,100 VOLLEYBALL - ADULT COED 23-345-340 - - 1,900 0% 1,900 VOLLEYBALL - YOUTH SPRING 23-345-346 2,637 - 3,675 0% 3,675 ADULT COED SOFTBALL 23-345-363 - 203 3,400 6% 3,400 YOUTH/BASEBALL/SOFTBALL 23-345-366 11,852 80 20,332 0% 20,332 YOUTH FOOTBALL 23-345-368 - 1,142 3,040 38% 3,040 SPRING YOUTH SOCCER 23-345-369 5,870 - 8,865 0% 8,865 FALL YOUTH SOCCER 23-345-370 2,300 5,090 4,890 104% 4,890 SOCCER CAMPS 23-345-371 - - 250 0% 250 FOOT RACES 23-345-372 15 1,505 2,950 51% 2,950 INDOOR SOCCER - YOUTH 23-345-374 - 453 2,450 19% 2,450 ADULT BASKETBALL 23-345-375 - - 800 0% 800 JR JAZZ BASKETBALL 23-345-376 - 4,690 5,400 87% 5,400 FLAG FOOTBALL 23-345-377 2,028 823 1,405 59% 1,405 FLAG FOOTBALL - ADULT 23-345-379 - - - 0% - YOUTH VOLLEYBALL 23-345-380 1,059 1,390 1,960 71% 1,960 YOUTH SPONSOR/BASEBALL 23-345-383 3,500 250 12,800 2% 12,800 ULTIMATE FRISBEE 23-663-573 - - 625 0% 625 Total Charges for services 29,267 15,627 81,642 19% 81,642 MRAC FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes MRAC -PREPAID SERVICES 23-347-310 709 855 - 0% - MRAC - FITNESS ADMISSIONS 23-347-311 6,415 4,704 10,000 47% 10,000 MRAC - FITNESS MEMBERSHIPS 23-347-312 18,591 13,626 43,500 31% 43,500 MRAC - CITY EMPLOYEES 23-347-313 - - 500 0% 500 MRAC - SILVER SNEAKERS MEMBERS 23-347-314 2,909 3,672 10,000 37% 10,000 MRAC - SWIM TEAM 23-347-315 3 540 - 0% - MRAC - SHOWERS 23-347-317 44,814 24,945 98,500 25% 98,500 MRAC - CASH OVER/SHORT 23-347-318 8 106 - 0% - MRAC - ADMISSIONS/AQUATIC 23-347-320 87,260 38,046 150,000 25% 150,000 MRAC - ADMISSIONS/AQUAT & FITN 23-347-321 3,954 286 12,000 2% 12,000 MRAC - RETAIL 23-347-322 12,846 5,653 12,000 47% 12,000 MRAC - CONCESSIONS 23-347-330 9,394 7,761 - 0% - MRAC - PROGRAM FEES/ AQUATIC 23-347-323 14,036 3,209 27,500 12% 27,500 MRAC - PROGRAM FEES/FITNESS 23-347-324 2,258 4,686 6,000 78% 6,000 MRAC - CHILD CARE FEES 23-347-325 5 - 1,000 0% 1,000 MRAC - MEMBERSHIPS/AQUATIC 23-347-326 30,987 10,872 32,000 34% 32,000 MRAC - MEMBERSHIPS/AQUAT & FIT 23-347-327 46,569 39,866 85,000 47% 85,000 MRAC - RENTAL FEES 23-347-328 3,863 1,185 8,500 14% 8,500 Total MRAC 284,620 160,012 496,500 32% 496,500 Moab arts & recreation PROGRAM FEES 23-348-310 2,115 307 11,400 3% 11,400 GRANTS AND DONATIONS 23-348-330 77,853 20,600 18,500 111% 18,500 RENTAL FEES 23-348-340 37,551 20,846 45,000 46% 45,000 SPECIAL EVENTS FEES 23-348-350 4,033 8,084 7,900 102% 7,900 SPECIAL EVENTS FEES - RED ROCK 23-348-351 (1,365) (13,139) 33,500 -39% 33,500 MARC - Retail/Concession 23-348-360 - 2,995 - 0% - Total Moab arts & recreation 120,187 36,698 116,300 32% 116,300 Miscellaneous revenue CENTER STREET GYM RENTALS 23-365-300 6,935 3,100 - 0% - BALL FIELD RENTALS 23-365-301 475 - - 0% - OTHER INCOME 23-365-360 6,607 - - 0% - Total Miscellaneous revenue 14,017 3,100 - 0% - Contributions and transfers FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes CITY OF MOAB 23-335-362 1,994,014 357,708 730,416 49% 730,416 Total Contributions and transfers 1,994,014 357,708 730,416 49% 730,416 Total Revenue: 2,568,258 523,144 1,539,858 34% 1,539,858 Expenditures: Parks, recreation, and public property Recreation Recreation SALARIES - DIRECTO 23-640-510 131,712 55,734 158,489 35% 158,489 Recreation EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23-640-513 71,483 37,637 81,101 46% 81,101 Recreation OVERTIME 23-640-515 465 308 1,500 21% 1,500 Recreation UNEMPLOYMENT 23-640-516 (191) - - 0% - Recreation SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEM 23-640-521 3,605 - 2,000 0% 2,000 Recreation ADVERTISING 23-640-522 1,722 4,102 3,000 137% 3,000 Recreation TRAVEL 23-640-523 - 1,714 - 0% - Recreation OFFICE EXPENSE & SU 23-640-524 969 76 2,000 4% 2,000 Recreation - EQUIP SUPPLIES & 23-640-525 991 110 1,000 11% 1,000 Recreation - UTILITIES 23-640-527 196 325 - 0% - Recreation TELEPHONE 23-640-528 1,277 407 2,400 17% 2,400 Recreation MONTHLY FUEL - GASC 23-640-530 - - 350 0% 350 Recreation PROFESSIONAL & TECH 23-640-531 2,489 2,587 3,500 74% 3,500 Recreation EDUCATION 23-640-533 315 850 2,350 36% 2,350 Recreation OTHER 23-640-535 97 - 200 0% 200 Recreation DIRECTOR - TRAVEL 23-640-536 - - - 0% - Recreation SPECIAL DEPARTMENTA 23-640-546 301 - 6,500 0% 6,500 Recreation EASTER EGG HUNT 23-640-592 1,146 20 2,500 1% 2,500 Recreation TURKEY TROT 23-640-593 1,432 1,288 - 0% - Recreation TRANSFER TO FUND BA 23-950-552 - - - 0% - Total Recreation 218,009 105,157 266,890 39% 266,890 Swimming Pool MRAC MAINTENANCE SALARIES 23-452-508 41,296 8,801 43,265 20% 43,265 MRAC LIFEGUARD SALARIES 23-452-509 111,241 65,948 243,556 27% 243,556 MRAC SALARIES & WAGES 23-452-510 209,266 136,169 238,422 57% 238,422 MRAC AQUATIC PROGRAM SALARIES 23-452-511 - - 29,013 0% 29,013 MRAC FITNESS PROGRAM SALARIES 23-452-512 6,637 6,651 18,324 36% 18,324 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes MRAC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23-452-513 107,454 55,951 116,582 48% 116,582 MRAC OVERTIME 23-452-515 1,196 1,103 500 221% 500 MRAC UNEMPLOYMENT 23-452-516 20,801 (92) - 0% - MRAC SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHI 23-452-521 324 119 - 0% - MRAC ADVERTISING 23-452-522 3,153 505 7,000 7% 7,000 MRAC TRAVEL 23-452-523 - 265 - 0% - MRAC OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 23-452-524 4,067 1,723 4,000 43% 4,000 MRAC EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTE 23-452-525 6,263 4,557 12,000 38% 12,000 MRAC BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTE 23-452-526 19,773 12,243 22,000 56% 22,000 MRAC UTILITIES 23-452-527 100,217 47,804 92,276 52% 92,276 MRAC TELEPHONE 23-452-528 7,136 3,441 5,106 67% 5,106 MRAC RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIP 23-452-529 - - - 0% - MRAC PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERV 23-452-531 2,310 6,432 23,100 28% 23,100 MRAC EDUCATION 23-452-533 1,614 850 3,000 28% 3,000 MRAC INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/S 23-452-534 302 - 1,500 0% 1,500 MRAC OTHER 23-452-535 114 9 900 1% 900 MRAC SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPP 23-452-546 49,671 14,400 30,000 48% 30,000 MRAC CONCESSIONS 23-452-547 5,438 3,211 - 0% - MRAC SUNDRY EXPENSES-MISCELLAN 23-452-561 10,954 1,588 4,500 35% 4,500 MRAC AQUATIC PROGRAMS 23-452-573 - - 1,800 0% 1,800 MRAC SPECIAL EVENTS 23-452-575 93 196 - 0% - Total Swimming Pool 709,228 371,679 896,844 41% 896,844 Soccer Soccer YOUTH SOCCER 23-642-501 3,634 - 4,020 0% 4,020 Soccer FALL SOCCER 23-642-502 1,058 1,073 1,200 89% 1,200 Soccer ADULT SOCCER 23-642-505 - - 700 0% 700 Soccer INDOOR - YOUTH SOCCER 23-642-509 - 731 1,095 67% 1,095 Soccer WAGES SOCCER 23-642-510 - - 1,600 0% 1,600 Soccer SOCCER REFEREE - WAGES 23-642-513 - - 255 0% 255 Total Soccer 4,691 1,804 8,870 20% 8,870 SUMMER CAMP Summer Camp WAGES 23-643-510 5,230 2,825 - 0% - Summer Camp BENEFITS 23-643-513 479 267 - 0% - Total Youth Volleyball 5,710 3,091 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Adult Softball COED SOFTBALL 23-644-527 - - 1,100 0% 1,100 Total Adult Softball - - 1,100 0% 1,100 Adult Volleyball CO-ED VOLLEYBALL 23-646-501 339 - 400 0% 400 Total Adult Volleyball 339 - 400 0% 400 Basketball ADULT BASKETBALL 23-648-503 - - 400 0% 400 JR JAZZ BASKETBALL 23-648-504 - 1,269 2,200 58% 2,200 JR. JAZZ REFEREE SERVICES 23-648-505 - - 3,040 0% 3,040 MS BASKETBALL REFEREES 23-648-507 - - - 0% - REFEREE SALARIES & WAGES 23-648-510 - 1,180 - 0% - Basketball EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23-648-513 - 157 407 39% 407 Total Basketball - 2,606 6,047 43% 6,047 Youth Volleyball YOUTH VOLLEYBALL 23-649-501 990 174 1,065 16% 1,065 YOUTH SPRING VOLLEYBALL 23-649-505 1,445 - 2,300 0% 2,300 Total Youth Volleyball 2,436 174 3,365 5% 3,365 Youth Baseball/Softball Youth BB/SB WAGES- MAINTENANCE 23-651-511 7,395 1,654 3,000 55% 3,000 Youth BB/SB WAGES- UMP&SCORE 23-651-512 3,076 797 5,880 14% 5,880 Youth BB/SB EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23-651-513 977 240 901 27% 901 Youth BB/SB STATE TOURN. EXP 23-651-523 - - 2,000 0% 2,000 Youth BB/SB EQUIPMENT-SUPPLIES 23-651-525 1,616 - 350 0% 350 Youth BB/SB BASEBALL FIELD MAI 23-651-526 256 948 1,300 73% 1,300 FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 23-651-573 146 - - 0% - YOUTH BASEBALL/SOFTBALL 23-651-574 16,699 2,300 15,850 15% 15,850 UTAH GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOC 23-651-577 - - 400 0% 400 UTAH BOYS BASEBALL ASSOCIATION 23-651-578 - - 400 0% 400 PICKLEBALL 23-651-580 155 (10) 200 -5% 200 Total Youth Baseball/Softball 30,320 5,929 30,281 20% 30,281 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Youth Football Youth Football BENEFITS 23-652-513 - - 83 0% 83 YOUTH FOOTBALL 23-652-575 2,901 8,741 6,170 142% 6,170 FLAG FOOTBALL 23-652-580 993 1,557 1,600 97% 1,600 FLAG FOOTBALL - ADULT 23-652-581 - - 100 0% 100 YOUTH FOOTBALL REFEREES 23-652-586 - - 920 0% 920 Total Youth Football 3,894 10,298 8,873 116% 8,873 Special Projects SPECIAL PROJECTS/EQUIPMENT 23-660-546 - - - 0% - Total Special Projects - - - 0% - Moab Arts & Recreation Center MARC SALARIES & WAGES 23-800-510 140,703 69,380 156,312 44% 156,312 MARC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23-800-513 83,289 31,718 87,565 36% 87,565 MARC SALARIES & WAGES - INSTRU 23-800-514 807 - 5,000 0% 5,000 MARC SALARIES & WAGES OT 23-800-515 1,439 320 2,000 16% 2,000 MARC UNEMPLOYMENT 23-800-516 (718) - - 0% - MARC SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHI 23-800-521 1,243 227 1,966 12% 1,966 MARC ADVERTISING/MARKETING 23-800-522 1,508 39 3,000 1% 3,000 MARC TRAVEL 23-800-523 - 25 250 10% 250 MARC OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 23-800-524 2,580 1,463 3,900 38% 3,900 MARC EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENA 23-800-525 1,232 63 2,000 3% 2,000 MARC BLDG GROUNDS SUPPL & MAIN 23-800-526 622 - - 0% - MARC UTILITIES 23-800-527 4,528 3,221 7,500 43% 7,500 MARC TELEPHONE 23-800-528 3,535 1,462 5,395 27% 5,395 MARC PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SE 23-800-531 - - 1,000 0% 1,000 MARC EDUCATION 23-800-533 - 200 - 0% - MARC OTHER 23-800-535 58 (635) 100 -635% 100 ONLINE PAYMENT PROCESSING FEES 23-800-536 574 - - 0% - MARC SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPP 23-800-546 3,045 - 6,000 0% 6,000 MARC MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 23-800-574 - - - 0% - MARC SPECIAL EVENTS 23-800-577 17,976 5,808 35,000 17% 35,000 MARC- RED ROCK ARTS FEST 23-800-579 3,335 1,869 - 0% - MARC SPECIAL PROJECTS 23-800-578 4,980 7,122 200 3561% 200 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Total Moab Arts & Recreation Center 270,735 122,281 317,188 39% 317,188 Total Expenditures: 1,239,652 619,929 1,539,858 40% 1,539,858 Total Change In Net Position 1,328,605 (96,785) - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 24 Community Development Change In Net Position Revenue: Contributions and transfers CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND 24-392-310 78,605 - - 0% - CDGB 24-392-324 74,000 - - 0% - Total Contributions and transfers 152,605 - - 0% - Total Revenue: 152,605 - - 0% - Expenditures: Community Development Community development CDBG PROJECT 24-400-619 98,951 - - 0% - Total Community development Total Expenditures: - - - 0% - Total Change In Net Position 152,605 - - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 28 Trails Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Contributions and transfers CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND 28-332-310 220,000 15,000 30,000 50% 30,000 Total Contributions and transfers 220,000 15,000 30,000 50% 30,000 Total Revenue: 220,000 15,000 30,000 50% 30,000 Expenditures: Millcreek Projects Millcreek PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 28-400-531 - - 30,000 0% 30,000 TRAILS 28-400-589 - - - 0% - INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE 28-400-590 - - - 0% - Total Millcreek - - 30,000 0% 30,000 Total Expenditures: - - 30,000 0% 30,000 Total Change In Net Position 220,000 15,000 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 30 Housing Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Charges for services Rent/Lease Income 30-362-301 140,772 67,865 98,000 69% 98,000 Total Charges for services 140,772 67,865 98,000 69% 98,000 Interest INTEREST INCOME 30-361-300 13,531 14,005 20,000 70% 20,000 Total Interest 13,531 14,005 20,000 70% 20,000 Miscellaneous revenue Proceeds from Long Term Debt 30-361-365 6,455,000 - - 0% - Transfer from Housing Fund Beg 30-395-350 - - 6,989,909 0%(121,572) 6,868,337 Reduced for return of bond proceeds in lieu of development Transfer From General Fund 30-391-310 - - - 0% - Total Miscellaneous revenue 6,455,000 - 6,989,909 0% 6,868,337 Total Revenue: 6,609,303 81,870 7,107,909 1% 6,986,337 Expenditures: General government Administrative Salaries and Wages 30-464-510 27,872 46 44,815 0% 44,815 Benefits 30-464-513 16,742 2 44,884 0% 44,884 OVERTIME 30-464-515 - - 5,000 0% 5,000 Development Costs 30-464-522 145,874 914 6,400,000 0%(6,350,000) 50,000 Reduced for Phase1 development Operation & Maintenance Costs 30-464-525 35,363 21,275 35,000 61% 35,000 O&M UTILITIES 30-464-527 44,731 16,539 40,000 41% 40,000 Transfer to Debt Service Fund 30-464-560 133,608 - 538,210 0%6,228,428 6,766,638 Increased to account for return of bond proceeds Total Administrative 404,190 38,776 7,107,909 1% 6,986,337 Total Expenditures: 404,190 38,776 7,107,909 1% 6,986,337 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Total Change In Net Position 6,205,113 43,094 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 31 Debt Service Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue Contribution from GC Rec Distr 31-362-360 165,000 - 190,000 0% 190,000 Contribution from Grand County 31-362-370 8,819 - 23,367 0% 23,367 Total Intergovernmental revenue 173,819 - 213,367 0% 213,367 Charges for services Lease Revenue 31-362-301 59,042 - 40,231 0% 40,231 Total Charges for services 59,042 - 40,231 0% 40,231 Contributions and transfers Transfer from general fund 31-391-310 109,714 47,631 95,261 50% 95,261 Transfer from housing fund 31-391-315 133,608 - 538,210 0%6,228,428 6,766,638 Total Contributions and transfers 243,322 47,631 633,471 8% 6,861,899 Total Revenue: 476,183 47,631 887,069 5% 7,115,497 Expenditures: Community Development Community development 2018 CIB Bond - Principal 31-471-615 29,000 30,000 30,000 100% 30,000 2018 CIB Bond - Interest 31-471-616 17,475 16,750 16,734 100% 16,734 2019 Walnut Lane Lease - Princ 31-471-617 62,000 65,000 65,000 100% 65,000 2019 Walnut Lane Lease - Inter 31-471-618 71,608 68,967 63,967 108% 63,967 2021 WALNUT LANE BOND PRINCIPA 31-471-619 - - 262,000 0%6,238,000 6,500,000 2021 WALNUT LANE BOND INTEREST 31-471-620 - 72,193 147,243 49%(9,572) 137,671 Total Community development 180,083 252,910 584,944 43% 6,813,372 Municipal Building Authority Municipal Building FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 2003 Sales Tax Rev - Principal 31-471-611 87,000 89,000 89,000 100% 89,000 2003 Sales Tax Rev - Interest 31-471-612 24,300 22,125 22,125 100% 22,125 2009 Sales Tax Rev - Principal 31-471-613 191,000 191,000 191,000 100% 191,000 Total Municipal Building 302,300 302,125 302,125 100% 302,125 Total Expenditures: 482,383 555,035 887,069 63% 7,115,497 Total Change In Net Position (6,199) (507,404) - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 41 Capital Projects Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Interest INTEREST INCOME 41-361-300 2,387 555 2,000 28% 2,000 Total Interest 2,387 555 2,000 28% 2,000 Miscellaneous revenue GRANT PROCEEDS 41-362-303 - 50,000 417,500 12%370,000 787,500 UDOT 400 E Bridge Contribution DONATIONS 41-362-300 330 75 - 0% - Total Miscellaneous revenue 330 50,075 417,500 12% 787,500 Contributions and transfers TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 41-391-310 683,299 324,556 890,183 36%370,000 1,260,183 400 E Bridge Contribution CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BEG. BAL 41-395-361 - - 50,000 0%743,000 793,000 Return of Hotspot Funding - Parking Structure Total Contributions and transfers 683,299 324,556 940,183 35% 2,053,183 Total Revenue: 686,016 375,185 1,359,683 28% 2,842,683 Expenditures: General government Administrative VEHICLES 41-740-690 9,852 - 9,852 0% 9,852 IT - COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 41-740-696 4,867 3,632 - 0% - IT - OTHER EQUIPMENT 41-740-697 109,264 13,663 - 0% - Total Administrative 123,983 17,294 9,852 176% 9,852 Public safety Police POLICE EQUIPMENT 41-791-650 - - 38,094 0% 38,094 POLICE VEHICLES 41-791-655 100,145 39,801 130,541 30% 130,541 Total Police 100,145 39,801 168,635 24% 168,635 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Animal Shelter ANIMAL SHELTER EQUIPMENT 41-791-641 - - 11,163 0% 11,163 Total Animal Shelter - - 11,163 0% 11,163 Public Works PARKING IMPROVEMENTS - DISPERS 41-440-666 - 4,841 - 0% - 400 EAST ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 41-440-686 - - - 0%740,000 740,000 400 E Bridge Construction 500 WEST/KANE CREEK IMPROVE 41-440-697 - - - 0% - VEHICLES 41-440-691 - - - 0% - Flood Damage Repair 41-440-699 - - 330,000 0% 330,000 Total Public Works - 4,841 330,000 1% 1,070,000 Parks, recreation, and public property Recreation CENTER STREET GYM MECHANICAL 41-770-651 - - - 0% - DARK SKY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 41-770-657 - - 100,000 0% 100,000 TRAIL & BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS 41-780-625 - - 300,000 0% 300,000 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 1%41-780-630 21,772 12,408 37,000 34% 37,000 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 41-780-644 48,624 - - 0% - PARKS EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES 41-780-646 - - - 0% - Total Recreation 70,396 12,408 437,000 3% 437,000 Swimming Pool AQUATIC CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 41-470-670 - - - 0% - AQUATIC CENTER SET ASIDE 41-470-671 - - - 0% - AQUATIC CENTER EQUIPMENT REPLA 41-470-672 - - - 0% - Total Swimming Pool - - - 0% - Moab Arts & Recreation Center MARC BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 41-460-672 68,381 13,051 50,000 26% 50,000 Total Moab Arts & Recreation Center 68,381 13,051 50,000 26% 50,000 Municipal Building BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 41-770-650 - - - 0% - Total Municipal Building - - - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Transfers and Contributions USU SETASIDE 41-790-645 286,676 - - 0% - RETURN OF LOAN/GRANT PROCEEDS 41-400-680 - - - 0%743,000 743,000 Return of Hotspot Funding - Parking Structure TRANSFER TO CP FUND BALANCE 41-400-690 297 - 353,033 0% 353,033 Total Transfers and Contributions 286,973 - 353,033 0% 1,096,033 Total Expenditures: 649,878 87,394 1,359,683 6% 2,842,683 Total Change In Net Position 36,138 287,791 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 51 Water Fund Income or Expense Income From Operations: Operating income Water Operating Income WATER PENALTIES 51-363-330 20,462 13,836 11,000 126% 11,000 Water SUNDRY REVENUES 51-369-300 39,006 109 40,000 0% 40,000 Water GOVERNMENT SHOP WATER 51-369-301 21,203 - 20,000 0% 20,000 Water TAXABLE SHOP WATER 51-369-302 76,510 987 60,000 2% 60,000 WATER SALES 51-371-300 1,803,972 896,691 1,703,461 53% 1,703,461 TAX ON SHOP WATER SALES 51-371-320 (5,453) 795 - 0% - WATER CONNECTION 51-372-360 69,942 24,253 65,000 37% 65,000 WATER TERMINATION 51-372-361 49 - - 0% - Total Water Operating Income 2,025,690 936,671 1,899,461 49% 1,899,461 Non-Operating Items: Water Non-operating income INTEREST INCOME 51-361-300 7,380 13,520 10,000 135% 10,000 WATER IMPACT FEES 51-361-311 164,987 55,645 70,000 79% 70,000 Total Water Non-operating income 172,367 69,165 80,000 86% 80,000 Total Income 2,198,057 1,005,836 1,979,461 51% 1,979,461 Operating expense Water Operating expense Water GENERAL FUND O/H 51-500-509 391,747 243,228 486,457 50% 486,457 Water SALARIES & WAGES 51-500-510 207,453 118,100 243,395 49% 243,395 Water EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 51-500-513 179,344 91,339 155,533 59% 155,533 Water OVERTIME 51-500-515 5,083 2,692 5,000 54% 5,000 Water SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSH 51-500-521 2,052 560 4,948 11% 4,948 Water TRAVEL 51-500-523 1,657 152 3,000 5% 3,000 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Water OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIE 51-500-524 59 229 - 0% - Water EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINT 51-500-525 5,154 1,057 22,500 5% 22,500 Water BUILDING SUPPL. & MAINTE 51-500-526 5,008 - 5,000 0% 5,000 Water UTILITIES 51-500-527 73,067 38,011 55,500 68% 55,500 Water TELEPHONE 51-500-528 3,421 1,525 3,125 49% 3,125 Water RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIP 51-500-691 2,107 2,107 8,500 25% 8,500 Water MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 51-500-530 11,383 5,603 12,600 44% 12,600 Water PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SER 51-500-531 42,605 9,928 31,500 32% 31,500 Water WATER/EDUCATION 51-500-533 2,005 195 5,000 4% 5,000 Water OTHER 51-500-535 1,974 240 4,000 6% 4,000 Water SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUP 51-500-546 53,351 19,485 60,600 32% 60,600 Water INSURANCE 51-500-551 1,560 1,560 1,600 98% 1,600 Water Sustainability 51-500-552 - - - 0% - Water DEPRECIATION 51-500-669 180,666 - 205,750 0% 205,750 Total Water Operating expense 1,169,697 536,011 1,314,008 41% 1,314,008 Water Non-operating expense Water INTEREST ON BONDS/DEBT S 51-500-682 174,953 77,747 174,252 45% 174,252 Total Water Non-operating expense 174,953 77,747 174,252 45% 174,252 Total Expense 1,344,650 613,758 1,488,260 41% 1,488,260 Net Income 853,407 392,078 491,201 80% 491,201 Water Fund Capital Budget Capital Expenses Land 51-160-111 - 0% - Water shares 51-160-115 - 0% - Water - Public Works Building 51-160-121 25,000 0% 25,000 Water System Upgrades 51-160-122 1,571,000 0% 1,571,000 Well 12 Construction 51-160-131 2,265,000 0% 2,265,000 2 Million Gallon Water Storage Tank 51-160-141 1,163,470 0% 1,163,470 Mill Creek Drive Waterline Improvements51-160-142 1,971,530 0% 1,971,530 Meters 51-160-143 140,000 0% 140,000 Fire Hydrants 51-160-144 - 0% - Manhole Replacement Project 51-160-153 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Equipment - general 51-160-161 - 0% - Equipment - water 51-160-162 162,000 0% 162,000 Office furniture and equipment 51-160-165 - 0% - Autos and trucks 51-160-171 - 0% - Total Purchases 7,298,000 0% 7,298,000 Debt Service 2018 Water Revenue Bond Repaid 51-251-220 47,942 47,942 25,061 191% 25,061 2021 Water Revenue Bond Repaid 51-251-226 - - 283,000 0% 283,000 Total Debt Service 47,942 47,942 308,061 16% 308,061 Total Capital Budget 47,942 47,942 7,606,061 1% 7,606,061 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 52 Sewer Fund Income or Expense Income From Operations: Operating income Sewer Operating Income Sewer SEPTAGE PROCESSING FEES 52-362-390 138,425 118,318 100,000 118% 100,000 SEWER EXISTING FACILITY FEE 52-372-300 72,547 24,037 80,000 30% 80,000 SEWER STUDIES FEE 52-372-310 3,827 1,206 6,000 20% 6,000 SEWER SERVICES CHARGES 52-372-320 1,545,076 806,371 1,489,670 54% 1,489,670 Sewer SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY 52-372-325 - - 2,000 0% 2,000 Sewer GREASE TRAP SERVICES/FIN 52-372-326 - 2,611 - 0% - Sewer SPANISH VALLEY SEWER 52-372-350 294,051 212,133 434,317 49% 434,317 Sewer SJSPSSD SEWER 52-372-360 14,522 8,600 10,000 86% 10,000 SEWER CONNECTION 52-372-370 5,999 2,040 10,000 20% 10,000 Total Sewer Operating Income 2,074,446 1,175,315 2,131,987 55% 2,131,987 Non-Operating Items: Sewer Non-operating income Sewer INTEREST INCOME 52-361-300 4,550 2,124 50,000 4% 50,000 SJSPSSD SEWER IMPACT FEES 52-361-305 57,624 4,044 50,000 8% 50,000 SEWER WRF RETAINAGE 52-361-307 137 - - 0% - GWSSA SEWER IMPACT FEES - OFFS 52-361-308 37,093 - - 0% - GWSSA SEWER IMPACT FEES 52-361-309 137,052 41,195 50,000 82% 50,000 SEWER IMPACT FEE INTEREST 52-361-310 5,662 3,840 18,000 21% 18,000 SEWER IMPACT FEES 52-361-311 128,694 61,751 50,000 124% 50,000 SEWER IMPACT FEE FINANCE INTER 52-361-313 6,907 - 6,000 0% 6,000 SVWSID CAPITAL ANNUAL CONTRIBU 52-361-315 102,207 102,207 - 0% - Total Sewer Non-operating income 479,926 215,161 224,000 96% 224,000 Total Income 2,554,372 1,390,477 2,355,987 59% 2,355,987 Operating expense FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Sewer Operating expense WRF Sewer GENERAL FUND O/H 52-600-509 378,837 236,507 473,013 50% 473,013 Sewer WRF SALARIES & WAGES 52-600-510 156,365 83,138 184,982 45% 184,982 Sewer WRF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52-600-513 117,438 52,169 143,820 36% 143,820 Sewer WRF OVERTIME 52-600-515 8,463 2,197 9,000 24% 9,000 Sewer WRF SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMB 52-600-521 3,433 1,435 5,874 24% 5,874 Sewer WRF TRAVEL 52-600-523 - 30 2,000 2% 2,000 Sewer WRF OFFICE EXPENSE & SUP 52-600-524 486 365 1,000 36% 1,000 Sewer WRF EQUIPMENT SUPPL. & M 52-600-525 22,357 66,488 30,000 222% 30,000 Sewer WRF BUILDING SUPPL. & MA 52-600-526 1,615 929 1,600 58% 1,600 Sewer WRF UTILITIES 52-600-527 159,531 86,331 160,000 54% 160,000 Sewer WRF TELEPHONE 52-600-528 5,099 2,418 5,000 48% 5,000 Sewer WRF RENT OF PROPERTY & E 52-600-529 - - 2,000 0% 2,000 Sewer WRF MONTHLY FUEL - GAS C 52-600-530 2,578 473 3,500 14% 3,500 Sewer WRF PROFESSIONAL & TECH.52-600-531 159,668 89,164 157,000 57% 157,000 Sewer WRF EDUCATION 52-600-533 4,550 509 3,000 17% 3,000 Sewer WRF SHIPPING\FREIGHT 52-600-535 19,234 11,632 8,000 145% 8,000 Sewer WRF SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 52-600-546 102,083 72,183 81,700 88% 81,700 Sewer DEPRECIATION 52-600-669 167,256 - 220,000 0% 220,000 Total WRF 1,308,992 705,967 1,491,489 47% 1,491,489 Sewer Collection System Sewer COLLECTION SALARIES & WA 52-610-510 88,754 50,968 107,528 47% 107,528 Sewer COLLECTION EMPLOYEE BENE 52-610-513 47,488 28,359 72,707 39% 72,707 Sewer COLLECTION OVERTIME 52-610-515 6,669 2,486 8,000 31% 8,000 Sewer COLLECTION SUBSCRIP & M 52-610-521 - 184 4,752 4% 4,752 Sewer COLLECTION TRAVEL 52-610-523 - 60 4,500 1% 4,500 Sewer COLLECTION OFFICE EXP & 52-610-524 23 - 900 0% 900 Sewer COLLECTION EQUIP SUPPLIE 52-610-525 16,593 4,627 28,000 17% 28,000 Sewer BLDG/GRDS SUPPLIES&MAINT 52-610-526 138 - 500 0% 500 Sewer COLLECTION UTILITIES 52-610-527 2,670 1,565 2,000 78% 2,000 Sewer COLLECTION TELEPHONE 52-610-528 1,087 538 3,000 18% 3,000 Sewer COLLECTION RENTALS 52-610-529 - 646 6,000 11% 6,000 Sewer COLLECTION MONTHLY FUEL 52-610-530 4,378 2,737 5,000 55% 5,000 Sewer COLLECTION PROFESSIONAL 52-610-531 57,389 22,172 337,250 7% 337,250 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Sewer COLLECTION EDUCATION 52-610-533 1,675 840 5,850 14% 5,850 Sewer COLLECTION OTHER 52-610-535 910 261 5,450 5% 5,450 Sewer COLLECTION SPEC DEPT SUP 52-610-546 30,814 8,173 44,000 19% 44,000 Total Sewer Collection System 258,587 123,617 635,437 19% 635,437 Sewer Non-operating expense Sewer INTEREST ON SEWER BONDS 52-600-682 287,636 185,419 208,114 89% 208,114 Total Sewer Non-operating expense 287,636 185,419 208,114 89% 208,114 Total Expense 1,855,216 1,015,003 2,335,040 43% 2,335,040 Net Income 699,155 375,473 20,947 1792% 20,947 Sewer Fund Capital Budget Capital Expenses Sewage treatment facilities 52-165-110 - 0% - Sewer lines 52-165-120 - 0% - Manhole Replacement Project 52-165-130 - 0% - Equipment - general 52-166-110 - 0% - Equipment - sewer 52-166-130 - 0% - Office furniture and equipment 52-166-165 - 0% - Autos and trucks 52-167-110 - 0% - Total Purchases - - - 0% - Debt Service 2017 Water Reclamation Facility 52-225-220 1,278,000 1,928,000 650,000 297% 650,000 2018 Sewer Bond 52-225-260 216,058 354,058 112,939 313% 112,939 Total Debt Service 1,494,058 2,282,058 762,939 299% 762,939 Total Capital Budget 1,494,058 2,282,058 762,939 299% 762,939 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 53 Storm Water Utility fund Income or Expense Income From Operations: Operating income Water Operating Income STORM WATER DRAINAGE FEE 53-364-350 345,261 172,625 285,190 61% 285,190 Total Water Operating Income 345,261 172,625 285,190 61% 285,190 Total Income 345,261 172,625 285,190 61% 285,190 Operating expense Water Operating expense Storm wtr GENERAL FUND O/H 53-400-509 84,186 52,557 105,114 50% 105,114 Storm wtr FUEL 53-400-530 3,451 1,946 19,260 10% 19,260 Storm wtr PROFESSIONAL & TECH.53-400-531 2,500 20,800 25,000 83% 25,000 Storm wtr SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 53-400-546 - 3,396 - 0% - Storm wtr DEPRECIATION 53-400-669 6,917 - - 0% - Storm wtr SPECIAL PROJECTS 53-400-675 591 240 - 0% - Total Water Operating expense 97,645 78,939 149,374 53% 149,374 Total Expense 97,645 78,939 149,374 53% 149,374 Net Income 247,616 93,685 135,816 69% 135,816 Storm Water Fund Capital Budget Capital Expenses Equipment - General 53-166-110 - 0% - Total Purchases - - - 0% - Debt Service Total Debt Service - - - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Total Capital Budget - - - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 55 Transit and Parking Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Charges for Services Transit Fares 55-372-310 - - - 0% - Total Charges for Services - - - 0% - Contributions and transfers UDOT Hotspot 55-362-310 - - 500,000 0% 500,000 Grand County Contribution 55-362-320 - 20,000 250,000 8%(230,000) 20,000 GC is a phased contribution General Fund Contribution 55-332-310 - 37,500 37,500 100% 37,500 Federal Contribution (FTA)55-362-330 - - - 0% - Transfer from Transit Fund Beg Balance 55-395-310 - - - 0% - Total Contributions and transfers - 57,500 787,500 7% 557,500 Total Revenue: - 57,500 787,500 7% 557,500 Expenditures: General Expenditures Operator Contract 55-400-510 - - 250,000 0% 250,000 Administrative Overhead 55-400-509 - - 45,000 0% 45,000 Marketing and Branding 55-400-511 - 3,500 17,500 20% 17,500 Transit Professional & Tech 55-400-531 - - - 0% - Transfer to PT Fund Balance 55-400-899 - - 475,000 0%(230,000) 245,000 GC is a phased contribution Total General Expenditures - 3,500 787,500 0% 557,500 Total Expenditures: - 3,500 787,500 0% 557,500 Total Change In Net Position - 54,000 - 0% - FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes 61 Health Insurance Fund Change In Net Position Revenue: Charges for services Health Reimb Arrgmt Premiums 61-341-310 549,338 242,684 675,547 36% 675,547 Dental Premiums 61-341-311 42,843 6,700 50,000 13% 50,000 Health Savings Account Premium 61-341-312 3,678 306 120,000 0% 120,000 Medical Insurance Premiums 61-341-313 904,955 316,786 1,296,000 24% 1,296,000 Life Insurance Premiums 61-341-314 7,945 5,832 14,000 42% 14,000 Vision Insurance Premiums 61-341-315 16,214 - 14,500 0% 14,500 Employee Health Savings Accoun 61-341-316 7,513 138 240,000 0% 240,000 Employee Supplemental Insuranc 61-341-318 - - 24,000 0% 24,000 Employee Life Insurance Premiu 61-341-319 - - 11,500 0% 11,500 Short Term Disability Premiums 61-341-320 (1,108) (4,367) 16,800 -26% 16,800 Total Charges for services 1,531,377 568,081 2,462,347 23% 2,462,347 Total Revenue: 1,531,377 568,081 2,462,347 23% 2,462,347 Expenditures: General government Administrative Third party administrator 61-415-651 1,078 759 - 0% - Health Reimbursement Arrangeme 61-415-652 383,546 225,171 574,215 39% 574,215 Dental Expenses 61-415-653 33,735 14,053 45,000 31% 45,000 Health Savings Account Funding 61-415-654 (581) 138 120,000 0% 120,000 Medical Insurance premiums 61-415-655 907,818 542,893 1,296,000 42% 1,296,000 Vision Insurance premiums 61-415-656 9,540 - 14,500 0% 14,500 Life Insurance premiums 61-415-657 (584) 4,737 14,000 34% 14,000 Assistance Program (EAP)61-415-658 3,003 1,974 3,720 53% 3,720 TeleMedicine 61-415-659 4,529 2,820 5,508 51% 5,508 Wellness Program 61-416-661 23,544 9,960 12,000 83% 12,000 Employee Health Savings Accoun 61-416-662 (1,834) 138 240,000 0% 240,000 FY22 Budget Amendment Proposal 02.08.2022 MOAB CITY CORPORATION 50% of the Fiscal Year has expired Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget FY21 Actual FY22 YTD Actual FY22 Adopted Budget % Budget Amendment Increase Amended Budget Amendment Notes Employee Supplemental Insuranc 61-416-663 22,278 - 24,000 0% 24,000 Employee Life Insurance premiu 61-416-664 13,351 - 11,500 0% 11,500 Short Term Disability 61-416-665 - 2,084 16,800 12% 16,800 Transfer to Fund Balance 61-426-665 - - 85,104 0% 85,104 Total Administrative 1,399,423 804,728 2,462,347 33% 2,462,347 Total Expenditures: 1,399,423 804,728 2,462,347 33% 2,462,347 Total Change In Net Position 131,955 (236,648) - 0% -