Loading...
05 May 10, 2012 Citizens advisory committee/ Social services transportation advisory council.. • RIVERSIDE COUNtY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE/ . SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TIME: 1:30 P.M. DATE: Thursday, May 10, 2012 LOCATION: County of Riverside~Ac:tmiftistrative Center Conference Room A · Teleconference ·site Indio Workforce Development Center 44199 B Monroe Street, Office 320 Indio, CA 92201 • • 4080 Lemon Street, ~·Floor Riverside, CA 92501 ••• COMMITTEE MEMBERS ••• Peter BenaVidez. Blindness Support Seivices, Riverside, Chair Jim Coline, Include Me, Inc., Indio, Vice Chair Michelle Anglin, City of Norco Joe F.orgiariai,:$Uflline Transit Agency, Thousand Palms Fortunato Penilla, Retired Citizen, Past Chair · . Andrea Puga, Corona . . Lorelkt Moe4..tma, Riverside Transit Agency, Riverside Sherry~ Community Access Center •. Riverside Mary Venetabte, Oflce of Supervisor Buster, County of Riverside ••* STAFF*** Robert Yates~ Multimodal Services Director Fina'Cff!tmente, Transit Manager · Martha Durbin, Staff Analyst •. ',;c• · .• ,,': :-~ • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE/ SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 1:30 P.M. Thursday, May 10, 2012 County Administrative Center Conference Room A 4080 Lemon Street, ~d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Teleconference Site Indio Workforce Development Center 44199 B Monroe Street, Office 320 Indio, CA 92201 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting . 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -OCTOBER 06, 2011 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 213 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 213 of the Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) Citizens Advisory Committee/ Social Services Transportation Advisory Council May 10, 2012 Page 2 6. COORDINATED PLAN UPDATE Overview This item is for the Committee to receive an oral report on the 2012 Update to the Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan for Riverside County. 7. FY 2012/13-FY 2014/15 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS 8. Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Review and approve, in concept, the FY 2012/13 -FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plans for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency, Riverside Transit Agency, Sunline Transit Agency and the Commission's Regional Commuter Rail . program, as presented; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS AND INFORMATION Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Committee Members and staff to report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Committee activities. 9. ADJOURNMENT The next Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council meeting is to be determined at a later date and will be held at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 3rd Floor, Conference Room A. • • • •• • . /II!IINUTES • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE/ SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL Minutes October 6, 2011 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Peter Benavidez called the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council to order at 10:34 A.M. at the Riverside County Transportation Commission Offices, 4080 Lemon Street, 3rct Floor, Conference Room A, Riverside, California 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Members Present Peter Benavidez Jim Collins Joe Forgiarini Lorelle Moe-Luna Andrea Puga Mary Venerable Members Absent Michelle Anglin Fortunato Penilla Sherry Thibodeaux 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES With a notation for the Call to Order to reflect that the Vice Chair is Jim Collins, the minutes were approved as submitted for May 12, 2011. 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS 6. There were no additions/revisions to the agenda. FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION WORKSHOP FOR SPECIALIZED TRANSIT Robert Yates, RCTC, provided an overview and introduced Dennis Brooks, AMMA . who presented a report on the upcoming Financial Administration Workshop for recipients of JARC/NF and Measure A grant awards under the 2011 Universal Call for Specialized Transit Program. The issues discussed in the workshop were accurate invoicing and reporting project performance on a monthly basis, managing available funds through projects duration, following FTA in-kind match Citizens Advisory Committee/ Social Services Transportation Advisory Council October 6, 2011 Page2 requirements and representing the value of volunteer hours, and an open forum for feedback and discussion of current project issues and concerns. 7. TRANSIT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS Heather Menninger, AMMA, gave a presentation regarding RCTC's Productivity Improvement Program. The original purpose was to encourage improved cost- efficiency by county's public transit operators. The established performance standards (mandated and discretionary) include TDA mandated performance and discretionary measures of performance indicators. A brief review was made on the current goals and targets for performance as well as an overview of the program's next steps. 8. COORDINATED PLAN • An update regarding the Human Services Transportation· Coordination Plan (Coordinated Plan) for Riverside County was presented to the CAC. Heather Menninger and Valerie Sedig, AMMA, gave background information regarding the Coordinated Plan. The 2011 update is aimed at revisiting the goals, objectives, • and initiatives identified in the original plan. Coordinated Plan goals are as follows: 1. Establish leadership and infrastructure to promote coordination within and between public transit agencies and human service organizations; 2. Build capacity to meet the demand for specialized transportation needs of a growing population; 3. Promote information portals to enable many points of access to transportation information responsive to varying client/consumer needs; and 4. Promote coordination policy at regional, state, and federal levels. The next steps for the Coordinated Plan Update process are: • December 2011 -Complete update of the database of transportation agencies in Riverside County • January 2012 -Conduct public scoping sessions in Coachella, Blythe, Western: Riverside and Banning/Beaumont areas • March 2012-Incorporate public input into Coordinated Plan and create draft update • April 2012 -Finalize Coordinated Plan Update • • • • Citizens Advisory Committee/ Social Services Transportation Advisory Council October 6, 2011 Page3 • August 2012-Begin preparation for FY 2013 Universal Call for Projects • November 2012-Open FY 2013 Universal Call • April 2013-Announcement of FY 2013 Universal Call Grant Recipients • July 2013-Start FY 2013 Call service 9. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS AND INFORMATION A brief presentation regarding Measure A was made by Fina Clemente, RCfC. The power point presentation was distributed and a brief discussion was held. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council, the meeting adjourned at approximately 12:07 P.M. The next meeting is scheduled for May, 2012, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, Conference Room A, 3rd Floor, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside 92501. Respectfully submitted, Fina Clemente Transit Manager • . . . . ' ' _, ' .~ • 1'1EM6 : ' .. ·., A presentation· wiJJ· Qe made . • ' I. I • • ., .. ~~---,__ .·· .. ··117:'11 7 . . • I~ e:UVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ~ ' L...__ r-;:· May 10, 2012 ~~;~ Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager n ~ .. ~)UGH: Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director i' -• --·~-c.-•••~~~-:1 ~, r ·7' E~·~T· Fiscal Year 2012/13-Fiscal Year 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plans \,_;,...._; .. : •..• ~t.t..J' II STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Review and approve, in concept, the FY 2012/13 -FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), Sun line Transit Agency (Sun line) and the Commission's Commuter Rail program, as presented; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. • BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • The Commission, under state law, is tasked with the responsibility to identify, analyze and recommend pptential productivity improvements for transit operators. While reviewing and analyzing individual route productivity remains with the transit operators and their governing boards, the Commission has a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that transit operators are utilizing Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds efficiently and effectively with the need to provide high quality service. The SRTPs were developed to meet the Commission's Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) which was adopted as part of a comprehensive effort to work with the county's public transit operators to maintain financially sustainable transit systems that maximize productivity and mobility for residents that travel within the region. The SRTPs provide a detailed description of each operator's profile of existing transit services and ridership, an analysis of potential transit dema.nd and performance indicators, as well as an assessment of operating improvements including changes to routes and schedules and capital needs for a planning period of three years. The SRTP process requires that transit operators address recommendations that are made by regular performance audits. In addition, the SRTP is used as documentation to support projects included in the regional transportation plan prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments, the region's metropolitan planning organization, which also provides opportunities for Operators to be eligible for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants to support operations and equipment needs. The Riverside County FY 2012/13 -FY 2014/15 SRTPs are comprised of plans that • cover the county apportionment areas of Western Riverside, Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. With a slight improvement in the economic outlook this coming fiscal year, the transit operators are focusing on initiating new enhancements in operating and capital improvements to meet the growing demand for transit services. This annual . ·update aims to continue evaluating current transit service and performance measures to keep up with substantial increase in travel demand within the region as well as improving necessary access and mobility for the large segment of the county's elderly, disabled and lower-income populations. Staff is requesting that the SRTPs be approved in concept only, as requests for financial allocations will be made at the July Commission meeting. City of Banning The city of Banning (Banning) works closely with the city of Beaumont (Beaumont) to provide a seamless transit system for the residents of Banning, Beaumont, and the unincorporated areas of Cabazon, Cherry Valley, and the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians reservation. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: Reinstate full Saturday and Sunday services on Routes 1 , 5 and 6 with reduced headways; In a cooperative effort with Beaumont, a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) of • both cities of Banning and Beaumont will be conducted; Purchase one fixed route coach bus for expansion and install auto display and enunciator equipment for fixed route fleet; and Install 6 additional shelters and continue placement of bus stop signs to reduce number of flag stops. City of Beaumont Beaumont Transit provides both dial-a-ride and fixed route services and works closely with Banning to provide a seamless transit system in the Pass area. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: A COA study will be performed in a cooperative effort with Banning; Increase service on current routes by adding additional buses at peak times and improve regional connectivity with San Bernardino County; Purchase GPS system for all vehicles compatible with Banning's system to track vehicle locations and install additional bus shelters and benches throughout the service area; Finalize a system-wide map showing all Beaumont and Banning routes; and Continue· collaborative efforts with Banning to improve coordination of routes,· schedules, passenger amenities and fares for seamless transit service in the Pass area . • • City of Corona • • The city of Corona (Corona) operates a fixed route system known as the Corona Cruiser and a general public dial-a-ride program. Corona closely coordinates all transfers with both RTA and the Commission's Commuter Rail services. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: Place into service ten new replacement Dial-A-Ride buses and one replacement Corona Cruiser bus; Purchase four Corona Cruiser buses for replacement; Potential .restoration of some Saturday trips eliminated in FY 201 0/11 when the city cut unproductive services to reduce cost; Conduct a competitive bid process to select the best qualified contractor to operate the city transit service. Current contract will expire in October 2012; and Promote alternative modes of transportation by improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities, identify new sidewalk and in-fill needs and continue expansion of bicycle route network. City of Riverside -Special Services Riverside Special Services (RSS) operates a 24-hour advance reservation dial-a-ride for seniors and persons with disabilities within the Riverside city limits. The program serves as an alternative to RTA's transit service for seniors and persons with disabilities unable to use fixed route service. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: · The new Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) vehicle maintenance facility will be operational starting July 2012. The facility includes 6 bays, an office and a large storage area for parts and equipment; Install additional slow fill stations at the Riverside Corporation Yard to meet fueling demand; Purchase 8 paratransit vehicles for replacement using federal 5307 and Proposition 1 B grant funds; and Expand and modernize the Operations facility to include a larger dispatch center and a separate conference room. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency The PVVT A provides fixed route . and a transportation reimbursement program for individuals who cannot ride the public bus system. The fixed. route can deviate up to three-quarters of a mile away from the actual fixed route. Service is provided within the city of Blythe and surrounding unincorporated county areas in the Palo Verde Valley. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: Modify Blue Route 1 to add service to the new shopping center and to the Baldwin Senior Apartments and Casa Encinas.every other scheduled hour; Route 2 will provide extended route to the Palo Verde College only when school is open • · and continue the additional round trip on Route 3 to the California State Prisons; Green Route 4 scheduled service will be reduced to 3 trips daily with timed transfers to other routes in the system; Implement the PWTA X-Tend-A-Ride, a demand response service to address special times when community events require general public service that are not available on the existing fixed route system; and Continue upgrade completion of the newly purchased transit facility. Riverside Transit Agency RTA provides local, intercity, and regional transportation services. As the Consolidated . Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) for western Riverside County, it is responsible for coordinating transit services throughout the service area, providing driver training and assistance with grant applications. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: Update RTA's 3-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and continue the procurement process for 85 Heavy Duty v~hicles and paratransit vehicles for replacement; Conduct a COA study to review existing operational services and provide a strategic plan for service enhancements; No major service modifications in FY 2012/13 but additional vehicles will be deployed on Routes 1, 16 and 19. Service changes are planned in FY 2014 and 2015 to improve connectivity and meet ridership demand; Implement the County shuttle service (Route 54) for a full year and discontinue the UC-• Riverside Bear Runner service (Route 53) due to low ridership; and Increase operating budget by approximately 7% over FY 2011/12 budget. Sun line Transit Agency Sunline is the CTSA for Coachella Valley and is responsible for coordinating transit services in the valley, which covers a service area of approximately 1,120 square miles. Sunline provides both local and regional transportation services with 11 fixed routes and demand response dial-a-ride services known as SunDial. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: Implement the new Palm Desert-Riverside Commuter Express bus service; Finalize plan to enhance performance of Palm Desert Line 53; Commence construction of the new Administrative Building project in Thousand Palms; Implement Line 81 in the City of Indio to offer transit service to new retail and commercial stores north of 1-10 and realign Line 80 based on comments received from the city <to provide service to unserved areas; and Continue the Taxi Voucher program in Coachella Valley. • • • • Commission's Commuter Rail Program The Southern California Regional Rail Authority operates seven commuter rail lines with 52 locomotives and 150 commuter rail cars. Three routes, the Riverside to Los Angeles Line, the Inland Empire to Orange County Line (IEOC), and the Riverside to Los Angeles via Fullerton Line (91 Line) directly serve western Riverside County with connecting service available to destinations on the other four Metrolink lines. Planned services for FY 2012/13 include: The FY 12/13 operating cost reflects a $4.7 million cost increase due to rising fuel cost; Potential service increase on 91 Line; Increase service with the addition of a fifth IEOC Line weekday train and additional year-round IEOC weekend service; and . Continue discussion with Metrolink Board and JPA partner agencies for the implementation of a fare increase. Attachments: FY 2012/13-FY 2014115 Operator SRTPs (7) • • . .. ··Information · . . . ~· .. > • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 11, 2012 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2012/13 Revenue Projections STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the projections of the Local Transportation Fund (l TF) apportionment for the Western Riverside County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley areas; 2) Approve the projections for Measure A; and 3) Approve the projections for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues. • BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • Local Transportation Fund The L TF projection consists of revenues generated from a quarter cent of the statewide sales tax. These L TF funds are principally used to fund transit requirements within the county of Riverside (County). The Transportation Development Act (TDA) legislation that created L TF requires the County Auditor Controller to annually estimate the amount of revenues expected to be generated from the sales tax. That estimate then becomes the basis for geographic apportionment and for claimant allocation through the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) process, which commences in January 2012 for the next fiscal year. While the County is the taxing authority and maintains custodial responsibility over the L TF revenues, the Commission by statute is charged with administration of the L TF funding process. The practice has therefore been for staff to develop the revenue estimate and then submit it to the County Auditor Controller for concurrence. Once th~ Commission and the County have agreed on a revenue amount, staff prepares the statutorily required apportionment. Apportionment is the process that assigns revenues to the three major geographic areas, as defined by TDA law, within the County: Western Riverside County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. The revenues are divided based on the respective populations Agenda Item 1 0 for each area. The apportionment occurs after off-the-top allocations for administration to the County and Commission and set asides for Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) planning (3/4 of 1 percent), local planning activities (3 percent), and bicycle and pedestrian projects (2 percent). Attachment 1 is the FY 2012/13 L TF apportionment based on a revenue estimate of $61 million. The estimate will be submitted to the County for its concurrence. The estimate is based on the revised projection for FY 2011/12 and assumes no change at this time due to continuing economic uncertainty. After the deductions for administration of $712,000 and set-asides of $3,447,510, the amount available for apportionment before reserves is $56,840,490. The balance available for apportionment is as follows: Apportionment Area Western Riverside County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Amount $ 45,182,359 10,976,592 681,539 $ 56,840,490 In accordance with the Reserve Policy adopted by the Commission on • January 12, 2005, a reserve of 10 percent for each apportionment area will be • established and set-aside for FY 2012/13, for unforeseen cost increases or other emergency. For the Western Riverside County apportionment area, a portion of the reserve will be allocated to each of the transit operators. For public bus transit operators, the allocation of the reserve is based on each operator's proportionate share of FY 2010/11 L TF operating allocations. Operators may access reserve funds by amending their SRTPs through the established amendment process. Measure A The Measure A projection consists of revenues generated from the local half-cent transactions and use tax approved by the voters in November 2002. These Measure A funds are principally used to fund highway, regional arterial, local streets and roads, new corridors, economic development, bond financing, bus transit, commuter rail, commuter assistance, and specialized transportation projects in the three geographic areas of Riverside County, as defined in the Measure A Expenditure Plan. · FY 2012/13 represents the fourth year of the 30-year term of the 2009 Measure A. The Measure A projection for FY 2012/13 is $124 million. The estimate is based on the revised projection for FY 2011/12 and assumes no change at this time due to continuing economic uncertainty. This projection will become the basis for the • preparation of the FY 2012/13 budget. The budget process typically commences Agenda Item 1 0 • • • in January of each year following the development of the Measure A revenue projections. Additionally, the amounts for the local streets and roads programs are usually provided to the local jurisdictions for planning purposes. After the deduction for administration of $2.7 million, which is approximately 2.2 percent of Measure A revenues, the amount available for distribution to the three geographic areas is $1 21 .3 million, which is allocated as follows: Geographic Area Western Riverside County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Amount $ 92,04 7,000 28,425,000 828,000 $ 121,300,000 The TUMF projection consists of revenues generated from fees charged to new development to ensure it pays for the new transportation facilities needed to accommodate growth. As a result of a memorandum of understanding executed in 2008 between the Commission and the Western Riverside Council of Governments, the administrator of the TUMF program, the Coni mission receives 48.7 percent of the TUMF revenues, after an administrative allocation, for the Commission's regional arterial program. The revenue estimate for FY 2012/13 is $4 million. The estimate is based on the projection for FY 2011/12, and assumes no change at this time due to the continuing uncertainty in the housing market and local economy. Upon Commission approval, staff will provide this information to the necessary local jurisdictions and transit operators for planning purposes. Staff will continue to monitor FY 2011/12 revenues during the development of the FY 2012/13 budget to determine if any adjustments to the revenue projections are necessary . Agenda Item 1 0 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2012/13 Amount: $61,000,000 LTF; $124,000,000 Measure A; $4,000,000 TUMF Source of Funds: j LTF, Measure A, and TUMF Budget Adjustment: I N/A $ 61,000,000 601 62 40102 2, 700,000 001001 401 40101 101 1X 40101 27,943,000 623999 401 40101 262 31 40101 10,136,000 613999 401 40101 261 31 40101 5,589,000 654199 401 40101 265 33 40101 1,397,000 269 62 40101 1,746,000 260 26 40101 582,000 270 26 40101 1,370,000 632199 401 40101 263 41 40101 GL!Project Accounting No.: 8,219,000 266 72 40101 26,572,000 267 71 40101 7,397,000 264 19 40101 1,096,000 683999 401 40101 268 31 40101 14,213,000 563999 401 40101 256 31 40101 9,948,000 257 71 40101 4,264,000 258 26 40101 828,000 234 71 40101 2,000,000 725000 416 41607 210 72 42110 2,000,000 735000 416 41607 2107342110 Fiscal Procedures Approved: ~~ I Date: I Attachments: 1) Measure A Program Allocation FY 2012/13 2) Riverside County LTF FY 2012/13 Apportionment Agenda Item 1 0 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION) FY 2012/13 • ORIGINAL Revenues $ 124,000,000 Less: Administration 2,700,000 APPORTIONMENT TO PROGRAMS $ 121,300,000 Western County Highway Improvements $ 27,943,000 New Corridors 10,136,000 Public Transit Commuter Rail 5,589,000 Intercity Bus 1,397,000 Specialized Transit-Operations 1,746,000 Specialized Transit-CTSA 582,000 Commuter Services 1,370,000 Regional Arterial 8,219,000 Local Streets & Roads 26,572,000 BANNING :J98,000 BEAUMONT CALIMESA 113,000 CANYON LAKE 127,000 CORONA 2;155;000 EASTVALE 639,000 HEMET 1,2.16,000 JURUPA VALLEY 1;336,000 LAKE ELSINORE .840,000 MENIFEE 1,054,000 MORENO VALLEY 2,655,000 MURRIETA r;557.ooo NORCO 452,000 PERRIS 1,003,000 • RIVERSIDE 5,009,000 SAN JACINTO 581,000 TEMECULA 2,061,000 WILDOMAR 413,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 3,809,000 RCTC Regional Arterial 554,000 Bond Financing 7,397,000 Economic Development Projects 1,096,000 SUBTOTAL-Western County 92,047,000 Coachella Valley Highways & Regional Arterials 14,213,000 Local Street & Roads 9,948,000 CATHEDRAL CITY 1,058,000 COACHELLA 477,000 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 346,000 INDIAN WELLS 185,000 INDIO 1,247,000 LA QUINTA PALM DESERT 2,050,000 PALM SPRINGS 1,546,000 RANCHO MIRAGE 689,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1,192,000 CVAG 1,158,000 Specialized & Public Transit 4,264,000 SUBTOTAL-Coachella Valley 28,425,000 Palo Verde Valley Local Street & Roads BLYTHE RIVERSIDE COUNTY • SUBTOTAL-Palo Verde Valley TOTAL $ 121,300,000 Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding dit RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND FY 2012/13 APPORTIONMENT Estimated Carryover (Unapportioned) Est. Receipts TOTAL REVENUES Less: Auditor Less: RCTC Administration Less: RCTC Planning (3% of revenues) Less: SCAG Planning (3/4 of 1% of revenues) BALANCE Less: SB 821 (2% of balance) BALANCE AVAILABLE BEFORE RESERVES Less: 10% Transit Reserves BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT APPORTIONMENT Western: Rail Transit Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley 22% 78% Population 1,762,906 428,280 26,592 2 217 778 Population %of Total $ Projection 61,000,000 61,000,000 12,000 700,000 1,830,000 457 500 58,000,500 1 160 010 56,840,490 5,684,049 51156 441 FY 2012/13 Apportionment 79.49% ,....:$:!:...-----'4'-"'0'-"6;.::.64~12~3~ 8,946,107 31,718,016 19.31% 9,878,933 1.20% 613 385 100.00% ..;$:b,.~5;.;.1:!,;, 1,;;;,56;;;,&•..;,44.;.,1~ ALLOCATION OF TRANSIT RESERVES (in accordance with Reserve Policy adopted January 12. 2005): Western: Rail $ 994,012 Transit: RTA Banning Beaumont Corona Riverside Subtotal Transit Subtotal Western Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Reserves $ 2,809,999 130,822 124,635 190,477 268,292 $ 3,524,224 $ 3,524,224 4,518,236 1,097,659 68154 5,684,049 NOTES: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences Population Source: California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit as of January 1, 2011 Allocation of Reserves: FY 201 0/11 SRTP Funding Allocations Approved 7/14/1 o • • • 12/20/20119:45 AM