Loading...
06 June 12, 2013 CommissionCOMM-COMM-00026 RECORL1S Rime County Translation Connlksion MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside Alo COMMISSIONERS eth Chair - Karen Spiegel Vice Chair - Marion Ashley Second Vice Chair - Daryl Busch Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside Jeff Stone, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Bob Botts / Deborah Franklin, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / To Be Appointed, City of Blythe Ella Zanowic / Jeff Hewitt, City of Calimesa Mary Craton / Randy Bonner, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez / Eduardo Garcia, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Eugene Montanez, City of Corona Scott Matas / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / Ike Bootsma, City of Eastvale Larry Smith / Robert Youssef, City of Hemet Douglas Hanson / Ty Peabody, City of Indian Wells Glenn Miller / Michael Wilson, City of Indio Frank Johnston / Micheal Goodland, City of Jurupa Valley Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann / Wallace Edgerton, City of Menifee Tom Owings / Marcelo Co, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Kathy Azevedo, City of Norco Jan Harnik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat / Steve Pougnet, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Al Landers, City of Perris Ted Weill / Scott Hines, City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar Basem Muallem, Governor's Appointee Comments are welcomed by the Commission. It you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:38 AM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Jennifer Harmon Subject: RCTC June Commission Agenda - 06.12.2013 Attachments: Conflict of Interest Memo.pdf; Conflict of Interest Form.pdf; Agenda Cover Notice_ 06.12.13.pdf Importance: High Good morning Commissioners: The June Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 12 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy this link: http://rctc.org/uploads/media items/iune-12-2013.orieinal.pdf In addition for your review is the attached conflict of interest memo, the form, and a notice about the substantive closed session items. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:49 AM To: Tara Byerly Subject: RCTC June Commission Agenda - 06.12.2013 Good morning Commissioner Alternates: The June Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 12 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy this link: http://rctc.org/uploads/media items/iune-12-2013.original.pdf Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 Rime {aunty Transportation ConmOssion TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Office and Board Services Manager DATE: June 5, 2013 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest - Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda of June 12, 2013 The June 12, 2013 agenda of the Riverside County Transportation Commission includes items that may raise possible conflicts of interest. A Commissioner may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 9A - Best Best and Krieger LLP Agreement for General Legal Services Amendment Consultant(s) Best Best and Krieger LLP Steven DeBaun, Partner 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Agenda Item No. 9F - Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2013/14 Consultant(s): AMMA Transit Planning Heather Menninger, Principal 393 Two Trees Road Riverside, CA 92507 Bartel Associates, LLC Doug Pryor, Vice President 411 Bore! Avenue, Suite 101 San Mateo, CA 94402 RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest June 5, 2013 Page 2 Beacon Economics LLC Sherif Hanna, Managing Partner 5777 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 895 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Bechtel Infrastructure Corporation George Nomura, Project Manager 3850 Vine Street, Suite 210 Riverside, CA 92507 Best Best and Krieger LLP Steven DeBaun, Partner 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Holly Rockwell, President 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 115 Torrance, CA 90505 Fieldman Rolapp and Associates Daniel L. Wiles, Principal 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1100 Irvine, CA 92612 Geographics Lisa Van Olden, Partner 4178 Chestnut Street Riverside, CA 92501 Infotech Services Group, Inc. Alison Baiter, President 5000 Via Mesita Newbury Park, CA 91320 McGladrey LLP Jeffrey M. Altshuler, Partner 18401 Von Karman, 56' Floor Irvine, CA 92612 MuniServices, LLC Doug Jensen, SVP Client Services 7625 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 108 Fresno, CA 93711 RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest June 5, 2013 Page 3 Norton Rose Fu/bright Victor Hsu, Partner 555 South Flower Street, 41st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, LLP Mary Collins, Partner 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 RJ Gorski and Associates Raymond J. Gorski, Principal 2871 Jed Road Escondido, CA 92027 Trapeze Software Group, LLC Steve Cimicata, Secretary 8360 East Via de Ventura, Suite L-200 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Riversitie Caen Transportation Commission ATTENTION RCTC COMMISSIONERS Please note the closed session items of this agenda are substantive. Please allow sufficient time in your schedule for your attendance at the entire meeting. Your participation is important and appreciated. June 12, 2013 RCTC Conflict of Interest Farm Purpose: This form is provided to assist members of the RCTC Commissioners in meeting requirements of Government Code Section 84308 grid 87100 in documenting conflict of interests as related to RCTC Commission/Committee agenda items. instructions: Under certain circumstances, RCTC Commission may be required to disclose and disqualify themselves from participating in, influencing, or voting on an agenda item due to personal income, reel property interests, investments, business positions, or receipt ofcampaign contribution. If 'applicable, : Commissioners must personally state ;the following information, for entry into the public record, prior to consideration of the involved agenda item(s) and tum in the completed form to the Clerk of the Board prior to leaving the meeting. Art RCTC member may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the elusion from any entity or individual. I. Board Merrther lniorration . Board Memt)er North City/County Name A .. Mleetifng Date - II. Campaign Contrbudone ,� 1. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution of over $250 from �G.., , Ott ame f �e"company and/or kWh( el) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on. Agenda item , Subject: Ditsri'«'k-"-- . 2. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution of over $250 from 0 tc , N Y name of or vid 1 and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda item � , Subject: 3. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution of over $250 from , ( (Identify the name of the company and/or Individual) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda item , Subject: . 4. I have a disqualifying CarTipfligri cctmtrtbution of over $250 from , (identify the name of the company and/or individual) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda item , Subject: . ,` III. Financial Int+art 1. I have a financial interest of , from/in -rams it e.mei property interest, investment or business position) (identify name of company or property location). .. and therefore I .am abstaining, from participation on Agenda Item , Subject: 2. I have a financial interest of , from/in - - au* woo* mei Ptpety interest, investment or business position) Ode s:Hy name of carnPany or Property location) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda Item , Subject: E IV. Signature Board Member Signature: Date: Please remember you must state the, information into the public record prior to consideration of the involved agenda item(s) and turn in the completed form to the Clerk of the Board prior to leaving the meeting. ee�eie■� • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9: 30 a.m. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, -will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waivethis three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or, presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 8, 2013 SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETINGS • 6. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receiveinputon the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; and 3) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14. 7. PUBLIC HEARING - ADOPTION OF FOUR RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT, PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN ALL OR PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ACCESSOR PARCEL NOS. 102-020-044; ' 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, AND 117-270-013; LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Page 5 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this ,report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 3 • 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-006, 13-007, 13-010, and 13-01 1, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. 8. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS - The Commissionmay add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. •s CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda 9A. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES - AMENDMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 93 1) Approve Agreement No. 07-31-164-07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 07-31-164-00, with Best Best & Krieger LLP (BBK) for additional legal services related to FY 2012/13 in the amount of $960,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 9B. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 95 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2013. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 4 9C. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Page 101 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 13-009, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14". 9D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page 108 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. 9E. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Page 126 Overview • This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis • for Quarter 4 (Q4) 2012. 9F. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 134 1) Approve the recurring contracts for fY 2013/14; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 5 9G. AGREEMENT WITH NOSSAMAN, LLP FOR ON -CALL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR SERVICES - AMENDMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 143 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-66-028-12, Amendment No. 9 to Agreement No. 06-66-028-00, for the on -call strategic partnership advisor services with Nossaman LLP (Nossaman) by extending the contract term of performance to March 9, 2018, and augmenting the agreement for an additional amount not to exceed $2.4 million plus a contingency of $240,000, for a total authorized contract value of $8,352,935; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required for the project. 9H. 2013 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 156 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2013 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. 91. 2009 MEASURE A WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL ARTERIAL FUNDS - CITY OF PERRIS PROGRAMMING REQUEST Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the request from the city of Perris (Perris) to program 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Regional Arterial funds in the amount of $2.3 million for the Harley Knox Boulevard widening project from Patterson Avenue to Perris Boulevard; 2) Approve Agreement No. 13-72-144-00 with Perris for Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funding for the construction phase; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Page 191 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 6 9J. 2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS Page 193 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the release of the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects for approximately $1 16 million of federal funding and $35 million of 2009 Western Riverside County Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funds. 9K. FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 2013 CALL FOR REHABILITATION PROJECTS - ADDITIONAL PROJECT PROGRAMMING Page 200 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve programming federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds for rehabilitation projects in the - amount of $1,268,000 as presented. 9L. 2009 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA Overview This item is for the Commission to: • Page 203 • 1) Approve the 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base "year level of $937,007 for the city of La Quinta (La Quinta) beginning with FY 2013/14; 2) Split Measure A revenues on a 50/50 basis between the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and La Quinta, until such time La Quinta reimburses CVAG for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) fees CVAG would have received from La Quinta if La Quinta had joined the TUMF program when the TUMF was established; and 3) Allocate La Quinta's share of Measure A local streets and roads funds starting in July 2013, which represents sales taxes earned in May 2013. • Riverside County Transportation. Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 7 9M. FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 - FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Page 227 Overview This item is for the Commission to review and approve, in concept, the FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program, as presented. 9N. FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2013 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5310 CAPITAL GRANT APPLICATIONS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 233 1) Adopt the FFY 2012/13 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5310 Riverside County project rankings as recommended by the local review committee (LRC); 2) Adopt Resolution No. 13-008, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Certifying Project Consistency with Regional Transportation Plan", certifying the projects are derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit -human services transportation plan (Coordinated Plan); and 3) Include the projectsin the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). 10. PROPOSED METROLINK BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Overview This item is for the Commission to: -Page 239 1) Adopt the preliminary FY 2013/14 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget with anticipation of a 3 to 7 percent fare increase; 2) Approve the additional 91 Line service with two additional peak period round trips; Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 8 3) Allocate the Commission's funding commitment to the SCRRA in an • amount not to exceed $8,401,000 in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for train operations and maintenance of way plus a contingency of $2,061,500 in LTF funds for new service options and fare policy possibilities; and 4) Allocate the Commission's Section 5309 grant funds in an amount not to exceed $1,729,300 for SCRRA capital rehabilitation projects. 11. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 245 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislative activities; 2) Adopt the following positions on state legislation: a) AB 37 (Perea) — Support; b) AB 401 (Daly) — Support; c) AB 493 (Daly) Support; d) AB 543 (Campos) - Oppose; e) AB 756 (Melendez) — Support if Amended; f) SB 778 (Committee on Transportation & Housing) — Support; 3) Revise the Commission's position on the following state legislation: a) AB 179 (Bocanegra) — Neutral; and b) AB 574 (Lowenthal) — Support if Amended. 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 13. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Case Number(s): RIC 1002250, RIC 1113896, and RIC 10016058 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 9 • 15. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting and is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SIGN -IN SHEET JUNE 12, 2013 NAME AGENCY E MAIL ADDRESS 6 ,/. d s ,5-»,19 A-1t Ai i2-42 Win, !3 5 hW� v�A c �rba�'� t hi- -Iv /v/1- V/1)--t_c. w 1ue� (% /�, �. J v re,, Ar ;717 0471V oitv- dif%:Ca ,070 -4C-P(. Cl kfii.- At fiji- m-Icl- °' hJo0E,<; \s � f ,.: ,,, ..---76 / y1, e-e_ k -,-.7.,_.67- SCE F Ka..#1/4-e_.k. ..„y4 e_yx CoveNAA__ . ct4....- .._ / ,�f(4/ cJ% ,S---- ‘e e'24 M: V / ill V -iXe. dal ftT D/s% 0 ----,\A.GLA(t.E-,c OA)J Z61 aCST A 4J ` 4-<,,ox- i_ _ ,,..,.. Wes__ .i,-, / /I ` a G ' • e Hi S CA7"Id E f)�-1, C' ,-rc `` LASC4pJ rA 1 L-LC14 ..L.NS�o 1 " o u cZS Ha\ A5 (07\ _ l � i 0/✓t We-) if )-kvvi4 t, Lb--z co keit-el i,, ,9-tot)e) c_o At 9/7%74-7 -f 123 frt_T - A / ,e,,: f S `# T - '/ 4/1/// riKNit s" RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL JUNE 12, 2013 Present Absent County of Riverside, District I gr0 County of Riverside, District II 0 County of Riverside, District III 0 )71' County of Riverside, District IV O County of Riverside, District V � 0 City of Banning O City of Beaumont � 0 City of Blythe � 0 City of Calimesa � 0 City of Canyon Lake � 0 City of Cathedral City O City of Coachella �� 0 City of Corona �6' O City of Desert Hot Springs � 0 City of Eastvale )6 0 City of Hemet ;If,. City of Indian Wells 0City of Indio0 City of Jurupa Valley � 0 City of La Quinta � 0 City of Lake Elsinore � 0 City of Menifee � 0 City of Moreno Valley � 0 City of Murrieta � 0 City of Norco � 0 City of Palm Desert 0 City of Palm Springs L'7 City of Perris "'r 0 City of Rancho Mirage � 0 City of Riverside � 0 City of San Jacinto ,�// 0 City of Temecula ,� 0 City of Wildomar 6 0 Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 j6 0 DETACH AND suBrvifr TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: ' 'unP, k21'7;)1' CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: SUBJECT OF (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) AGENDA ITEM: NAME: Te4-er P3encivi PHONE NO.051)31 i I -0232 ADDRESS: STREET CITY ZIP CODE REPRESENTING:IN i1rxintE s Ser v i ceS PHONE NO.: NAME OF AGENCY / OR A RATION / GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: SO �0 �G� 1jY . � Ve'f5� �I� RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, May 8, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Karen Spiegel at 8:30 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Steve Adams Marion Ashley Roger Berg Ben Benoit* Bob Botts Daryl Busch Jeff Comerchero Mary Craton Joseph DeConinck Rick Gibbs Berwin Hanna Douglas Hanson Jan Harnik Terry Henderson Steven Hernandez* Kevin Jeffries *Arrived after the meeting was called to order 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Frank Johnston Bob Magee Scott Mann Scott Matas Greg Pettis Larry Smith Karen Spiegel Jeff Stone John F. Tavaglione Ted Weill Ella Zanowic Commissioners Absent John J. Benoit Ginny Foat Andrew Kotyuk Glenn Miller Basem Muallem Tom Owings Adam Rush There were no requests to speak from the public. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 2 4. CLOSED SESSION 4A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Case Number(s): RIC 10022760 and RIC 1113896 There were no announcements for Closed Session items. 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Spiegel adjourned the meeting at 9:45 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 8, 2013, in the Board Room, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside,_. California. Respectfully submitted, C.)u"^"..Y3-(L_ ‘-ko-CANNI Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MINUTES Wednesday, May 8, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Karen Spiegel at 9:55 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner John Tavaglione led the Commission in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Steve Adams Marion Ashley Roger Berg Ben Benoit Bob Botts Daryl Busch Jeff Comerchero Mary Craton Joseph DeConinck Rick Gibbs Berwin Hanna Douglas Hanson Jan Harnik Terry Henderson Steven Hernandez Kevin Jeffries 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Frank Johnston Bob Magee Scott Mann Scott Matas Basem Muallem Greg Pettis Adam Rush Larry Smith Karen Spiegel Jeff Stone John F. Tavaglione Ted Weill Ella Zanowic Commissioners, Absent John J. Benoit Ginny Foat Andrew Kotyuk Glenn Miller Tom Owings Commissioners 'Marion Ashley and Daryl Busch presented Lisa DaSilva, Capital Projects Manager, with the Construction Management Association of America 2013 Project Achievement Award for the State Route 74/Interstate 215 project: Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 2 Deanna Reeder, a Moreno Valley resident, read a portion of the 2009 Measure A ordinance regarding the developer improvements, noting these funds cannot be used to replace developer required infrastructure. She requested the Commission rescind its approval from Moreno Valley for the Nason Street project. She suggested if the Commission continues to condone Moreno Valley's action then the Commission may look as bad as Moreno Valley. Commissioner Jeff Stone stated this is the major interchange commuters utilize to get to the county hospital. He stated he feels very comfortable the Commission is operating within the spirit of Measure A. Steve DeBaun, Legal Counsel, expressed caution as discussion to public comments is not allowed under the Brown Act and if further discussion is necessary, the matter needs to be agendized for the next Commission meeting. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — APRIL 10, 2013 M/S/C (Henderson/Craton) to approve the minutes as submitted. Abstain: Comerchero and Smith 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, presented the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14, and discussed the following areas: • Budget process; FY 2013/14 Budget considerations; • Budget summary; • Sources by breakdown; • Sources comparison; • Expenditures by department; • Expenditure breakdown comparison; • Capital department expenditure highlights; • Functional expenditures breakdown and comparison; and • Next steps. At this time, Commissioners Roger Berg and Steven Hernandez stepped out of the meeting. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 3 Chair Spiegel opened the public hearing and requested comments from the public. No comments were received from the public. Chair Spiegel then requested comments from the Commissioners. Commissioner Jeff Stone expressed appreciation for summarizing the financials and maintaining the 1 percent threshold of Measure A funds for personnel salary and benefits. Commissioner Stone asked how much Measure A fund utilization is for the express benefits of a private developer. Michele Cisneros replied none. Commissioner Stone stated the Commission does not build infrastructure for the benefit of private developers, however, private developers do benefit from the projects the Commission builds. He commended staff for a comprehensive budget and its delivery of projects. M/S/C (Stone/Henderson) to continue the public hearing for the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14 to the Commission meeting on June 12, 2013. No: Jeffries 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions/revisions to the agenda. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Stone/Henderson) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. 8A. AGREEMENTS FOR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1) Award Agreement No. 13-19-077-00, to Logan Circle Partners, L.P. and Agreement No. 13-19-135-00, to Payden & Rygel Investment Management for investment management services for _a five-year term, and two additional one-year options to extend the agreement, for a total period of performance of up to seven years, in an aggregate amount of $1.8 million, plus a contingency amount of $200,000, for a total amount not to exceed in an aggregate- value of $ 2 million; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 4 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve • contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required during the period of services. 8B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2013. 8C. STATE ROUTE 91 PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1) Approve Agreement No. 09-31-081-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 09-31-081-00, with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. (Parsons) to provide project_ and construction management (PCM) services for Phase 2 of the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIF') widening and extension of the 91 Express Lanes design -build project in the amount of $81,410,793, plus a contingency of $6.1 million for a total amount not to exceed $87,510,793, and a total authorized contract value, for Phase 1 and 2, of $147,595,337; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required for the project. 8D. 91 EXPRESS LANES OPERATOR AGREEMENT 11 Approve the 91 Express Lanes Operator Agreement No. 13-31-105-00 between the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), and Cofiroute USA, LLC (Cofiroute) for operations and maintenance services for the 91 Express Lanes in the amount of $30,998,133, plus a contingency amount of $3,099,813, for a total amount not to exceed $34,097,946;. 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the agreement. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 5 8E. FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 2013 CALL FOR REHABILITATION PROJECTS Approve programming federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds for rehabilitation projects in the amount of $12,142,000 as submitted. 8F TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM REGIONAL ARTERIAL FUNDS — CITY OF PERRIS PROGRAMMING REQUEST 1) Approve the request by the city of Perris to program Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial funds in the amount of $1.36million for the Perris Boulevard widening project from Ramona Expressway to Perry Street; 2) Accept $2,388,000 million in federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds from the Perris Boulevard project for reprogramming at the discretion of the Commission; 3) Approve Agreement No. 08-72-097-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 08-72-097-00, with the city of Perris to add TUMF funding for the construction phase; and 4) Authorize the Chair or Executive 'Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 8G. AMENDMENT WITH STV INCORPORATED TO PROVIDE DESIGN SUPPORT DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PERRIS VALLEY LINE PROJECT 1) Approve Agreement No. 07-33-123-10, Amendment No. 10 to Agreement 07-33-123-00, with STV Incorporated (STV) for design support during construction for the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project in the amount of $6,841 ,749, plus a contingency amount of $1 million, for a total amount not to exceed $7,841,749, and a total authorized contract value of $48,673,386; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee, pursuant to legal counsel review, to approve the use of the contingency as may be required for the project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 6 8H. LOS ANGELES — SAN DIEGO — SAN LUIS OBISPO RAIL CORRIDOR AGENCY UPDATE AND REVISED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT 1) Receive an update on the Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) implementation effort; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the 2013 Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement that allows the Commission to be included as voting member in the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency. 81. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT 1) Approve modification to SunLine Transit Agency's (SunLine) FY 2012/13 capital improvement program to reflect an additional $1,456,000 in Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5309 State of Good Repair (SGR) program funds and $314,584 in South Coast. Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) funds for the solar panels replacement and new installations project; 2) Allocate $49,416 in State Transit Assistance (STA) funds to cover needed capital matching funds for the above Section 5309 program solar panel project; and 3) Approve an amendment to SunLine's Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the changes above. 8J. AGREEMENT WITH CASE SYSTEMS, INC. FOR CALL BOX SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1) Award Agreement No. 13-45-102-00 to CASE Systems, Inc. for call box system maintenance services throughout Riverside County for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed $1 .25 million; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 7 8K. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE RISING STARS IN TRANSIT INTERNSHIP PROGRAM 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 13-25-106-00 between the Commission and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for the Rising Stars in Transit — Internships for University Students program; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the MOU on behalf of the Commission. 8L. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt a Support position on AB 1081 (Medina). 9. STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TOLL -SUPPORTED DEBT FINANCINGS Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, presented the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) Plan of Finance update, highlighting the following areas: • SR-91 CIP 2013 financing activities; • SR-91 CIP plan of finance overview; • SR-91 CIP updated sources and uses; • 2013 toll revenue bonds; • Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan; • SR-91 CIP flow of funds; • Toll -supported debt events of default; • SR-91 CIP toll financing documents; and • Next steps. Theresia Trevino introduced the financing team members. In response to Commissioner Stone's question regarding toll fees and revenues, Theresia Trevino replied the traffic and revenue study performed by Stantec was used to determine the toll fees. The Commission adopted its toll policy on June 7, 2012, which is disclosed in the official statement. Additionally, if toll revenues are not sufficient to pay for operations and debt service, then the toll fees could increase. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 8 Commissioner Stone discussed alternative fuel and electric vehicles free use of the toll roads that he believes will result in a paradigm shift and asked about the Commission's exposure if the bonds cannot be paid. Anne Mayer replied staff evaluated the traffic revenue projections analyzed for this corridor for approximately seven years. The Commission is fortunate that there are many years of operation in Orange County from which to draw real data including: 1) stress tests on traffic; 2) revenue projections; 3) and the existing electric vehicle circumstance. Commissioner Stone expressed caution that the full potential for electric vehicles on tolls has not been seen yet as these vehicles become affordable. Anne Mayer stated with the solid foundation, staff went forward in terms of the traffic and revenue projections and evaluated the demographics and the change in patterns of housing and job markets. She discussed the stress test studies, the investment grade ratings on the toll revenue bonds, and the TIFIA loan. She explained with regard to the electric vehicles, there is legislation to extend the free usage of toll lanes, which means electric vehicles are exempt from any responsibility to pay for capital improvements or operations and maintenance of the system. She discussed the fluctuations in the traffic and revenue studies and paying off the debt. At Commissioner Stone's request for clarification about paying the debt, Anne Mayer replied it is paid with toll revenues. She stated the Commission will not use Measure A or other sources to pay off the debt. Commissioner Stone expressed the bond holders are at risk in the event there is an electric car revolution and the state continues to allow these vehicles on the toll roads for free. Anne Mayer concurred and explained the Commission's responsibility is to ensure it is working within the toll policy to pay back the debt, which means staff may bring forward adjustments to the toll policy for approval. She stated the toll policy is set to manage traffic in the corridor. Theresia Trevino noted there is a revision with the financing team that reflects it does not apply to the sales tax bond proceeds in the construction fund and the pay go contribution during the construction period are excluded from the trust estate. Commissioner Bob Botts expressed appreciation for the simplified presentation. He clarified the TIFIA loan is for $451 million and asked about the $35 million difference. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 9 Theresia Trevino replied the loan was approved up to a maximum of $451 million based on the costs that are TIFIA eligible and one-third equates to $416 million based on the financial model information. She stated the loan agreement will reflect the initial loan amount. Commissioner Adam Rush asked what resource is funding the operation and maintenance and when will the facility be turned over to Caltrans. Theresia Trevino replied it is the operation and maintenance fund deposit. She stated for the first three months of operation, $3.4 million will be set aside from the toll revenue bond proceeds when operations commence. The toll facility will be turned over to Caltrans after the 50-year term. There will be a maintenance agreement executed with Caltrans. Anne Mayer explained $3.4 million is the initial deposit for operations and maintenance and the Commission is required to maintain a program for 50 years until it is turned over to Caltrans. Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, further clarified the 50 years of operations and maintenance are factored into the lifecycle costs for the project, which covers: 11 annual maintenance; 2) two longer term major pavement rehabilitation work; and 31 the toll system infrastructure will be replaced periodically throughout the 50 years. In response to Commissioner Rush's question if the funding comes from ongoing toll revenues, Theresia Trevino replied with regard to the two longer term major pavement rehabilitation work, the Commission will fund the repair and rehabilitation reserve starting when the toll operations commence. She explained a certain amount of revenues will be generated from the flow of funds that will be deposited each year. Anne Mayer clarified Measure A funds cannot be used for those repairs and rehabilitations. Michael Blomquist stated once the financing is complete and the bonds are paid off, toll revenue will fund the operations and maintenance. Commissioner Terry Henderson expressed appreciation to staff for bringing the implementing documents forward to enhance this program. She noted she does not support toll roads. As for electric cars and other vehicles subsidized with tax dollars, she does not support these programs either. She assured the Commissioners the multiple taxing ideas will come to fruition and it will be severe. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 10 Commissioner Steve Adams requested clarification that payments will commence on the TIFIA loan after construction is complete. He referred to Commissioner Stone's comment and noted history has shown if this proliferation of electric cars and CNG happens, then the incentives to buy go away and these commuters would become toll payers. Theresia Trevino stated interest payments commence in 2022 and principal payments commence in 2027. Commissioner Mary Craton stated as a former member of Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG), there were discussions about electric vehicles and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). She expressed opposition to VMT as it creates a hardship on commuters in the Inland Empire, but suggested if these discussions continue, there could be a VMT tax to pay for the maintenance and operations that includes electric vehicles. M/S/C (Gibbs/Zanowic) to: 1► Adopt Resolution No. 13-004, "Resolution Authorizing Agreements Relating to the Sale of Not to Exceed $400,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Riverside County Transportation Commission Toll Revenue Bonds in. One or More Series, Including the Execution and Delivery of a Master Indenture, a First Supplemental Indenture, a Second Supplemental Indenture, a Purchase < Contract, an Official Statement, and a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, and a Loan Agreement Relating to Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program Credit Assistance, and the Taking of All Other Actions Necessary in Connection Therewith"; 2) Approve the draft Official Statement for the issuance for a not to exceed amount of $400 million in 2013 Toll Bonds and - authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the printing and distribution of the Official Statement; 3) Approve the draft Continuing Disclosure Agreement related to the 2013 Toll Bonds between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., as dissemination agent, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final ContinuingDisclosure Agreement; 4) Confirm the approval of, and ratify proposed changes to, the draft form of the Master Indenture, previously approved by the Commission at its July 2010 meeting, between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (BNYM), as Trustee, related to the Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 11 2013 Toll Bonds and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Indenture; 5) Confirm the approval of, and ratify proposed changes to, the draft form of the First Supplemental Indenture, previously approved by the Commission at its July 2010 meeting, between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, related to the 2013 Toll Bonds and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final First Supplemental Indenture; 6) Approve the draft Second Supplemental Indenture for the TIFIA loan between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Second Supplemental Indenture; 7) Approve the draft Bond Purchase Agreement between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as Underwriter Representatives acting on behalf of themselves and J.P. Morgan Securities, (collectively the Underwriters), for the 2013 Toll Bonds and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Bond Purchase Agreement; and 8) Approve the draft TIFIA Loan Agreement between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the USDOT for an amount not to exceed $451 million and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Bond Purchase Agreement. No: Henderson At this time, Commissioner Hernandez rejoined to the meeting. 10. STATE ROUTE 91 DESIGN -BUILD CONTRACT Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, presented the State Route 91 design -build contract award, highlighting the following areas: • Two-step design -build procurement; • Commission actions at its June 2012 Commission meeting; • Factors in the evaluation; • Benefits of best value design -build; • Evaluation team organization chart; • Proposal evaluation goal; • Selection formula; • Technical proposal scoring; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 12 • • • • Atkinson/Walsh technical proposal highlights; Price score calculation; Contract price, present value, and price score; Contract award to Atkinson/Walsh; Side by side comparison of the top two teams; Negotiation of design refinements; Authorizing work and project financing; Procurement schedule; Recent procurement activity; and Staff recommendation. Michael Blomquist acknowledged the Atkinson/Walsh team in attendance to support the contract award. In response to Commissioner Rush's request for clarification regarding the difference in technical scoring, Michael Blomquist stated it does not include the contract refinements to the overall project made after the initial score. Also, staff would have initiated negotiations for those items, regardless of whom the apparent best value proposer was. Commissioner Ben Benoit asked about the warranty for this project. He -noted the incident that occurred on the 60/91 /215 interchange at the Chicago Avenue bridge. Michael Blomquist replied typical contracts have a one-year warranty for the work, however, this contract has a two-year warranty. He clarified this does not include claims for negligent or defective work after the warranty period is over. Anne Mayer discussed the issues with the 60/91 /21,5 interchange after the Chicago Avenue bridge was constructed and how it was resolved. Anne Mayer requested Michael Blomquist discuss how design deficiencies would be addressed after the warranty period. At this time, Commissioner Berg rejoined to the meeting. Michael Blomquist introduced Corey Boock, Nossaman LLP, procurement counsel for this project. Corey Boock explained generally with design being completed by the design - builder instead of an engineering firm, the Commission transfers much more risk over to the design -builder as a single point of responsibility, which is why design -build was chosen. In terms of issues outside of the warranty • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 13 period, there are contract rights and statute of limitations that apply under this contract. Also, in California there is a statute of repose, which is a 10- year latent defect period. In response to the Commissioner Benoit's question regarding the wireless vehicle detector system, Michael Blomquist explained it will be installed in the new pavement and any pavement rehabilitation work. There are approximately 60 to 80 of these devices. Commissioner Stone expressed appreciation for an outstanding presentation. He discussed the new hospital in the city of Temecula and incentives for the contractor to bring the project in under budget. He asked if similar discussions have occurred for this design -build contract. Michael Blomquist explained before the teams were prequalified and procurement began, staff looked to align the agency's project goals with procurement. One of those items was schedule and the Commission approved a weighting of technical scoring, bid, and schedule. In the scoring and criteria, the Commission valued early completion. He stated staff claimed success in that staff did incentivize the early completion through the selection process. Commissioner Stone replied there are two issues being discussed: 1) early completion; and 2) the contractual amount that goes to this contractor if there are any savings generated for this project. Michael Blomquist replied this is not how the contract was structured and it would take significant re-evaluation of the contract. Commissioner Stone stated an incentive could be beneficial and asked if there is a liquidated damages clause. Corey Boock explained if the contractor is more efficient, performs faster, and the project costs less than the bid, the savings belong to the contractor. He explained within the contract there is a concept called value engineering, which both sides initiate ideas associated with it and if the parties agree and there is a cost savings it does get split between the parties. Michael Blomquist stated the liquidated damages clause is $95,000 per day of delay if the delay is due to the contractor's work. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 14 Commissioner Stone moved the motion and requested if there are any creative additions to this contract that could incentivize it to bring the project in under budget and to share those benefits with the contractor, he is strongly in favor to amend the contract. Chair Spiegel clarified if the contractor brings the project under budget it does not have to split the savings with the Commission as the contractor receives 100 percent. Anne Mayer expressed appreciation to the Commission for its vision, leadership, and trust in staff to put together an outstanding team to develop this procurement and bring it to fruition. In addition, she expressed appreciation to staff, the consultant teams, and Atkinson/Walsh. M/S/C (Stone/Ashley) to: 1) Award Agreement No. 12-31-113-00 to Atkinson/Walsh, a Joint Venture, for the design and construction of the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) in the amount of $632,572,050, plus a contingency amount of $31,628,603, for a total amount not to exceed $664,200,653; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work to be performed pursuant to the agreement terms up to the total not to exceed amount; 4) Authorize staff to issue a Notice to Proceed No. 1 in the amount of $10 million after execution of the agreement; and 5) Authorize staff to issue a Notice to Proceed No. 2 for the remainder of the contract work after the successful sale of toll revenue and Measure A sales tax bonds and funding of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Transportation Investment Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan. At this time, Commissioner Hanson left the meeting. 11. CLOSED SESSION 11A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representatives: Executive Director Unrepresented Employees: All Commission employees other than Executive Director • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 15 There was no announcement from the Closed Session item. At 12:27 p.m., the Commission meeting reconvened to open session. 12. CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RESOLUTION NO. 13-005, "RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR EMPLOYER PAID MEMBER CONTRIBUTIONS" Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, discussed the background for conducting the classification and compensation study. She then provided an overview for the classification and compensations study results and recommendations discussed in closed session and staff's recommendations for the implementation of employee's cost sharing of pension benefits. Steve DeBaun noted to the public that a copy of the salary schedule is available for those wishing to have a copy of it. Commissioner Stone expressed the Commission began as a much smaller organization and has kept a very lean staff while implementing a multibillion capital improvement plan. He explained a number of good professionals have left the Commission and the new pay structure would aid in retaining and attracting qualified employees. He explained the Commission salary expense would stay below the 1 percent in Measure A, which is in compliance with the voters of the county. He moved the motion and asked the Commissioners show support and appreciation for its employees. Commissioner Scott Mann asked if there is an impact on the phase implementation plan for cost sharing into CaIPERS with an increase by 50 percent contributions in calendar years 2015 2022. Michele Cisneros replied the Commission contracts with an actuarial firm and it will perform a study in July 2013. Commissioner Ashley replied the employee's share will remain at 8 percent. Commissioner Rick Gibbs noted the employees at the Commission are of a unique skill set, and believes it is prudent to pay talented people what they are worth while remaining good stewards of the public trust by staying within the 1 percent figure related to Measure A. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 16 Commissioner Kevin Jeffries expressed appreciation for allowing him to address the issue that was forwarded to the Commission for approval and wanted to express his concerns regarding the previous Executive Committee action. He stated in his experience in water districts, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), and every local government entity, a financial decision to authorize pay increases must be done in public session. He expressed his belief the previous action of the Executive Committee was in violation of the Brown Act, however, the current Commission action cures the problem. He expressed he does not support all of the pay increases and would vote no, and reiterated his concern the Executive Committee's previous action was a violation of the Brown Act. Steve DeBaun disagreed with Commissioner Jeffries position that the Executive Committee had violated the Brown Act. He explained the Commission had a closed session discussion and that discussion did not have an action associated with it. He stated the Executive Committee actions were taken in open session. He also apologized if there was a miscommunication with Commissioner Jeffries. Commissioner Jeffries concluded by stating he would allow the emails to be entered into the record or given to anybody that wants to see his concerns regarding the Brown Act and the responses from legal counsel. Commissioner Botts indicated most of the Executive Committee members believed the Executive Committee acted in a legal manner. He stated he clearly remembered staff explained any changes to classifications and new positions would be in the budget and discussed publicly. M/S/C (Stone/Henderson) to: 1) Consider for approval the recommended action per closed session labor negotiations to modify the pay structure effective July 11, 2013, to incorporate the new staff assignments and market rate movement since May 14, 2008, and implement salary range classifications. Subsequent exhibits will be distributed during the open Commission meeting; 2) Implement the employees' cost sharing of the Employer -Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) of 3 percent beginning July 11, 2013, with a corresponding salary increase of 3 percent respectively; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 13-005, "Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of Riverside County Transportation Commission for Employer -Paid Member Contributions'; to reflect the cost sharing of normal pension costs by employees. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 17 No: Jeffries and Mann 13. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar. 14. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 14A. Commissioner Botts announced: • The Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) Annual Regional Conference and General Assembly was held on May 2 and 3. There were approximately 1,000 people in attendance and it was an outstanding conference; and • Commissioner Greg Pettis was elected President of SCAG. 14B. Anne Mayer announced: • The Riverside County Small Business Expo will be held on June 27, 2013; and • The Commission's Full Speed Ahead 2009 — 2019 Delivery Plan brochure was distributed to the Commissioners. III15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Spiegel adjourned the meeting at 12:44 p.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, June 12, 2013, in the Board Room, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California. Respectfully submitted, H0.1L)mk)r Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2013/14 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; and 3) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The annual fiscal budget is the result of staff determining the operating and capital needs for FY 2013/14 and identifying the resources to fund those needs. The budget process began in December 2012. The goals and objectives approved by the Commission on March 13 were the basis of this budget., The goals and objectives considered during the preparation of the budget relate to mobility initiatives, goods movement, improved system efficiencies, environmental stewardship, economic development, intermodalism and accessibility, and public and agency communications, and financial and administrative policies. On May 8, staff presented the proposed budget to the Commission. Subsequent to that presentation, staff updated the document as a result of the following changes resulting in a net decrease of $26,180,800 to the projected ending fund balance: Adjustments to Fiscal Year 2012/13 Projected Amounts: • Net decrease in investment income, operating transfers in, and debt proceeds of $654,000, $193,147,900, $665 million respectively; net increase in professional services and support costs of $5,000 and $15,000, respectively; and net decrease in projects and operations, debt service, and operating transfers out of $1,898,200, $87,566,600, and $193,147,900, respectively. While some of the adjustments related to further review and Agenda Item 6 analysis of department worksheets, significant adjustments related to the rescheduling of financial close on the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) to early July. Adjustments to Fiscal Year 2013/14 Budgeted Amounts: • A decrease of $3,266,000 in federal reimbursements for 2009 Measure A Western County highway projects following review of the budget compilation; • An increase of $11 million in state reimbursements for the SR-91 CIP as a result of the recent update to the project financing; • A net increase of $105,000 in state reimbursements for various commuter rail projects following review of the budget compilation; • A decrease of $155,000 in local reimbursements due to the incorrect classification of state reimbursements after further review and analysis; • A $700,774,000 increase in toll and sales tax revenue bonds and $16 million increase in Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan proceeds due to the SR-91 CIP financial close in July 2013; • A net increase of $282,241,900 in operating transfers in related to the updated SR-91 CIP financing and debt service reserves; • A $63,000 increase in investment income as a result of a net increase in state reimbursements and debt proceeds; • A $951,400 increase in personnel salary and benefits due to the addition of four full-time equivalents, market equity adjustments- resulting from the completion of the biennial classification and compensation study, a 3 percent cost of living adjustment offset by employee's contribution for the normal share of pension benefits, and a 3 percent pool` for merit -based salary increases; • A net increase of $1,383, 800 in professional services related to disclosure counsel and financial advisory services for the issuance of toll and sales tax revenue bonds, ridematching software enhancements, and various project development and assistance; • A net increase of $409,800 in support services related to Commission - owned station ground maintenance needs and station security projects; • A net increase of $61,000 in engineering costs related to the 60/215 East junction high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane connector project and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) regional arterial project after further review and analysis; • A net increase of $2,459,000 in construction management and support services on the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connector project, SR-74 curve widening project, and a 2009 Western County Measure A regional arterial project after further review and analysis; • A $25,050,000 increase in design -build costs on the SR-91 CIP after further review and analysis; • • Agenda Item 6 2 • A $269,000 increase in right of way acquisition on the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connector after further review and analysis; • A $48 million increase in right of way acquisition on the SR-91 CIP after further review and analysis; • A decrease of $5,680,000 in State Transit Assistance expenditures based on review and analysis of Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) submissions; • A net decrease of $1,254,000 in Local Transportation Fund expenditures based on review and analysis of SRTP submissions; • A $150,000 increase in special studies related to a commuter rail feasibility study in the Coachella Valley; • A $157,500 increase in TUMF regional arterial program expenditures after further review and analysis; • A $80 million increase in debt service principal payments to retire outstanding commercial paper notes with 2013 sales tax revenue bond proceeds; a $15,035,100 increase in debt service interest payments related to the toll and sales tax revenue bonds related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project; and $7.5 million increase in cost of issuance related to the toll and sales tax revenue bonds issued in July 2013 after further review and analysis of the updated SR-91 CIP financing plan; and • A net increase of $282,241,900 in operating transfers out related to the updated SR-91 corridor improvement project financing and debt service reserves. A public hearing to allow for public comment on the proposed budget, as revised, is required prior to the adoption of the proposed budget. The public hearing was opened at its May 8 Commission meeting. After the public hearing is closed on June 12, adoption of the proposed budget for FY 2013/14 will follow. In accordance with the Commission's fiscal policies, the budget must be adopted no later than June 15 of each year. The proposed Budget for FY 2013/14 is attached. This document contains the executive summary, as revised, that was presented at the May 8 Commission meeting; the Gann Appropriations Limit; the guiding policies related to the preparation of the budget; a summary of the budget process; fund budgets, details of program revenues and other sources; debt; department budgets; a community profile; and appendices including a glossary of acronyms, funding definitions, and program/general terms. Agenda Item 6 A summary of the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14 is as follows: FY 2 013 /14 Budget Revenues and other financing sources: Sales taxes -Measure A, LTF, and STA $ 232,798,000 Reimbursements (federal, state, and other) 230,839,700 TUMF 6,723,400 Other revenues 500,000 Interest on investments 4,026,500 Debt proceeds 810,774,000 Transfers in 636,325,800 Total revenues and other financing sources 1,921,987,400 Expenditures and other financing uses: Personnel salary and fringe benefits 7,949,400 Professional services 26,675,500 Support services 5,593,300 Projects and operations 856,426,500 Capital outlay 796,200 Debt service (principal, interest and costs of issuance) 135,712,300 Transfers out 636,325,800 Total expenditures and other financing uses 1,669,479,000 Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses 252,508,400 Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 590,821,600 843, 330,000 Attachment: FY 2013/14 Proposed Budget (Posted on Commission Website) Agenda Item 6 NM Mom_ Riverside County Transportation C.ommission D June 12, 2013 Honorable Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California FY 2013/14 Budget Introduction The Future is Here Thank you for your interest in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013/14 budget for the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission or RCTC). This document provides an opportunity to evaluate and review the financial backbone of an innovative and successful public transportation agency. The upcoming fiscal year will be one of unprecedented investment and construction in Riverside County's transportation infrastructure — an investment that will undoubtedly improve the area's mobility and economic standing for decades to come. Once again, RCTC is presenting its largest and most comprehensive budget in its 36-year history which includes the beginning of construction for the $1.3 billion State Route (SR)-91 Corridor Improvement Project. This major project reveals the agency's comprehensive approach to mobility with investments in highway capacity, toll road development, rail transit, and express bus service that links all of it together. In addition to building its own projects, RCTC has been a conduit for financing a number of local projects as well. In just four years inclusive of 2011 through 2014, more than $4 billion in construction spending will be devoted to transportation projects constructed by RCTC, the County of Riverside (County), local cities, or the California Department of Transportation (Ca!trans). The obvious reason for this commitment is to invest in a better transportation system resulting in better mobility, but we are also investing in Riverside County's future. It's a future that should include more local jobs, new businesses being formed, employers moving to the area, and making it easier to access numerous locales that will appeal to visitors throughout the world. People Working — Building a Better Future The Commission and its project partners at Ca!trans, local jurisdictions, and transit agencies are investing in transportation using a variety of local, state, and federal sources to build projects, plan and design new improvements, and get people working and contributing to the local economy. The results of the work are coming to fruition with improvements completed on the southern portion of Interstate (1)-215, the 74/215 interchange, I- 10 interchanges in the Coachella Valley, and work speeding ahead on SR-91 in Riverside and the 60/215 interchange on the Riverside/Moreno Valley border. During FY 2013/14, the Commission will invest $751 million in capital projects that include highway, regional arterial, and rail projects. The Commission's overall budget will exceed $1 billion and includes funding of transit operations, payments to cities and the County for street and road improvements, and management of smaller programs such as motorist and commuter assistance. The Commission's status has become somewhat unique in Southern California. As many transportation agencies have consolidated functions and grown in size, the Commission remains true to the original intent of the state of California (State) legislation that first created it —now operating with a staff of 46 budgeted positions. This maintains the original vision of the Legislature when it created the Commission in 1976. By doing so, the Commission remains effective in its role as a transportation planning and funding agency by maintaining productive relationships with other agencies. For example, Measure A funds local transportation priorities and needs. In FY 2013/14, the Commission will return $44 million in funding to local cities and the County for local streets and roads needs. The Commission also receives and programs funding from state and federal sources. This includes the State's Transportation Development Act program dollars that are allocated primarily to the County's major public transit providers. Measure A also pays its share by funding transit fare discounts and programs for senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited means and by operating a commuter assistance program that provides traveler information and ridesharing assistance to employers and commuters. The 5R-91 Corridor improvement Project in Corona: Fuli Speed Ahead In May 2013, the Commission approved a $632.6 million design -build contract to widen SR-91 through Corona. The project will add two tolled express lanes and a general purpose in each direction of SR-91 between the Orange County line and 1-15. Additional project improvements will include enhanced transit service along the corridor, a collector -distributor lane system near the 1-15 and Main Street, and better connections between SR-91 and 1-15 including a direct connector to the 91 Express Lanes from the northbound 1-15. The $1.3 billion project, which breaks ground in 2013, is expected to generate 16,000 new jobs and will be the largest ever funded by the Commission. This year's budget also reflects an ongoing investment in project development work which includes the acquisition of needed right of way. The eventual completion of the project will culminate in a transformation of Riverside County's transportation system with reduced congestion, toll lane options, and enhanced transit service. The overall economic effect for the County will be significant and will aid economic development opportunities throughout the region. Perris Valley Line Project: A Needed Regional Priority Yet another regionally significant project is the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension which awaits environmental and legal approvals and is scheduled to break ground during the upcoming fiscal year. The project will extend Metrolink from Downtown Riverside to South Perris, enabling Metrolink to serve additional Riverside County residents and employers. It will also establish a much stronger transit backbone that will complement existing and future bus service, pedestrian and active transportation improvements, and economic development efforts. Maior Corridors Seeing Major Investment 1-215: Construction crews completed a new lane in each direction along a six -mile stretch of the southern segment of 1-215—a project which is being funded through Measure A and state bond funding. This is now being followed by a similar project along a 12.5-mile portion of the central segment of 1-215. At the northern edge of the I-215 and SR-60, the East Junction HOV lanes connector project is underway. The Commission completed the project development for this effort, and Caltrans is responsible for the construction activities. Additionally, constructing has begun to add a new carpool lane in each direction from the 60/91/215 interchange all the way into San Bernardino County. The lead agency for this bi-county project is the San Bernardino Associated Governments. 1-10: Construction has been completed on rebuilt and expanded freeway interchanges at Palm Drive, Indian Canyon Drive, Bob Hope Drive, and Date Palm Avenue in the Coachella Valley. The completed projects were funded through a combination of federal, state, Measure A, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee funding. Two additional projects on Jefferson Avenue and Monterey Avenue are currently in project development. Caltrans and the County are the lead agencies for these projects. 5R-91: Construction is underway on the addition of a carpool lane along a six -mile stretch of SR-91 through downtown Riverside. The project will not only widen SR-91 through downtown Riverside but will also rebuild and improve a number of interchanges and local connections with the freeway. A Commitment to Riverside County Ensuring local funding for transportation will require ongoing outreach to the public and transparent oversight and management that ensures public confidence in the Commission's fiduciary, oversight, and visionary roles. This budget document is intended to demonstrate the Commission's commitment to the public as well as documenting the Commission's dedication to sound budget practices. This budget document is one of many ways the Commission works to ensure public accountability and full transparency of its actions. Yet another Commission priority is in customer service and is demonstrated in our investment in thg 1E511 Traveler Information Service and other motorist service programs such as outreach to employers for ridesharing assistance, the maintenance and establishment of freeway call boxes, and the Freeway Service Patrol program. As the Commission adds more responsibilities to become a toll facility operator, it will increase RCTC's interaction with the public which will only strengthen our commitment to communicating in an effective and proactive manner. We welcome public input and participation and invite you to visit our website at www.rctc.org or to follow us on Twitter @RCTC. GFOA Distinguished Budget Award The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to RCTC for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, an operations guide, a financial plan, and a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. The Commission believes that this budget continues to conform to program requirements, and it will be submitted to GFOA to determine the Commission's eligibility for another award. Acknowledgements The preparation of this budget has been a collaborative effort of the Commission's staff. The budget reflects the Commission's desire to communicate the components of the budget in terms that are easily understandable and supportable for the general public. Staff acknowledges and appreciates the guidance and leadership of the Board of Commissioners and the sense of renewal and commitment it has and continues to inspire. Signature on file Signature on file Anne Mayer, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMISSION INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Budget Overview Commission Personnel Department Initiatives Fund Balances Budget Comparative Operating and Capital Budget Budget by Governmental Fund Type Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Section 1: GUIDING POLICIES Commission Policy Goals and Objectives Financial and Administration Policies Policy Matrix Section 2: BUDGET PROCESS SUMMARY Budget Process Functional Organization Chart Staff Organization Chart Section 3: FUND BUDGETS Budgetary Basis and Fund Structure General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds Debt Service Fund Section 4: REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES Revenues and Other Sources Program Revenues and Other Sources Section 5: COMMISSION DEBT Debt Debt Capacity Analysis Aggregate Debt Service Schedule Outstanding Debt and Debt Service Requirements Program and Geographic Debt Outstanding Legal Debt Margin Section 6: DEPARTMENT BUDGETS Budget Comparison by Department 6.1: MANAGEMENT SERVICES Executive Management Administration Legislative Affairs and Communications Finance 6.2: REGIONAL PROGRAMS Planning and Programming Rail Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assistance Narrative discussion of the history of the Commission and list of principal officers Narrative overview of the operational and financial factors considered Summarized narrative overview, charts, and tables of sources and uses Personnel expenditures and full-time equivalents Major initiatives and summarized uses by department Projected fund balances by governmental fund type and program Schedule of budget by summarized line item Schedule of budget classified by operating and capital purposes Schedule of budget by governmental fund type Listing of budgeted capital project expenditures by program Narrative discussion of the appropriations limit Narrative description of policy goals and objectives Description of financial policies Linkage of policy goals to departmental goals and objectives Narrative description of various budget stages Organization chart by Commission functions Organization chart of budgeted staff Narrative description of budgetary basis and fund structure Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses by Measure A and non -Measure A special revenue funds Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses Narrative description of various revenues and other sources; schedule of funding sources by department/program; definitions and background Narratives of revenues by program Narrative discussion of debt programs Charts and accompanying narrative demonstrating debt capacity Schedule of debt maturities by year for sales tax bonds Description of outstanding debt and related debt service requirements as of June 30, 2014 Charts of debt service by program and geographic area Schedule of calculation of legal debt margin Schedule of revenues, expenditures, and other financing sources (uses) by department Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses 6.3: CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Project Development and Delivery Location of Capital Projects Capital Projects Summary Local Streets and Roads Summary Section 7: COMMUNITY PROFILE Riverside County Demographics Statistical Information Commission Facts Section g: APPENDICES Glossary of Acronyms Funding Definitions Program Terms General Terms Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Local map of major capital projects for current year Narrative description of each capital project Schedule of local streets and roads disbursements by local agency Narrative discussion of Riverside County's community profile Charts of various demographic data Charts and tables of various statistkal information Narrative overview of the Commission's programs and services Explanation of commonly used abbreviations Narrative description of various funding sources Description of Commission programs and related terms Commonly used terms in governmental accounting and finance Commission Introduction State of California (State) law created the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission or RCTC) in 1976 to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County (County). The Commission's mission is to assume a leadership role in improving mobility in the County. The governing body consists of all five members of the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's 28 cities, and one non -voting member appointed by the Governor of California. The Commission is responsible for setting policies, establishing priorities, and coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and other agencies. The Commission also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal, state, and local funds for highway, transit, rail, non -motorized travel (bicycle and pedestrian), and other transportation activities. The Commission serves as the tax authority and implementation agency for the voter approved Measure A Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Measure A was originally approved by the County's electorate in 1988 and imposed a one-half of one cent transaction and use tax (sales tax) to fund specific programs that commenced in July 1989 (1989 Measure A). The 1989 Measure A was approved for 20 years and expired on June 30, 2009. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A beginning in July 2009 through June 2039 (2009 Measure A). Additionally, the Commission provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. These services include the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a program that provides call box service for motorists; the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP), a roving tow truck service to assist motorists with disabled vehicles on the main highways of the County during peak rush hour traffic periods; and Inland Empire 511 (IE511), a traveler information system. These services are provided at no charge to motorists and are funded through a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations. The Commission is also legally responsible for allocating Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds, the major source of funds for transit in the County. The TDA provides two sources of funding: the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), which is derived from a one -quarter of one cent state sales tax, and State Transit Assistance (STA), which is now derived from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel. Prior to 2010, STA revenues included the tax on gasoline. Finally, the Commission has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the County. As the CMA, the Commission coordinates with local jurisdictions in the establishment of congestion mitigation procedures for the County's roadway system. Name Kevin Jeffries John F. Tavaglione Jeff Stone John J. Benoit Marion Ashley Bob Botts Roger Berg Joseph DeConinck Ella Zanowic Mary Craton Greg Pettis Steven Hernandez Karen Spiegel Scott Matas Adam Rush Larry Smith Douglas Hanson Glenn Miller Frank Johnston Terry Henderson Bob Magee Scott Mann Tom Owings Rick Gibbs Berwin Hanna Jan Harnik Ginny Foat Daryl Busch Ted Weill Steve Adams Andrew Kotyuk Ron Roberts Ben Benoit Basem Muallem Riverside County Transportation Commission List of Principal Officials Board of Commissioners Title Member Member Member Member Vice Chair (Commission) Member Member Member Chair (Budget and Implementation Committee) Member Member Member Chair (Commission) Vice Chair (Eastern Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Member Member Vice Chair (Budget and Implementation Committee) Member Vice Chair (Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Chair (Eastern Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Member Member Member Member Member Member Member 2nd Vice Chair (Commission) Member Member Chair (Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Member Member Governor's Appointee Management Staff Anne Mayer, Executive Director John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director Agency County of Riverside, District 1 County of Riverside, District 2 County of Riverside, District 3 County of Riverside, District 4 County of Riverside, District 5 City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Eastvale City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of Jurupa Valley City of La Quinta City of Lake Elsinore City of Menifee City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula City of Wildomar Caltrans, District 8 Executive Summary Introduction The budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013/14 is presented to the Board of Commissioners (Board) and the citizens of Riverside County. The budget outlines the projects the Commission plans to undertake during the year and appropriates expenditures to accomplish these tasks. The budget also shows the funding sources and fund balances that will be used for these projects. This document will serve as the Commission's monetary guideline. To provide the reader a better understanding of the projects, staff has included descriptive information regarding each department and major projects. The discussion in each department includes a review of accomplishments, major initiatives, and key assumptions. Staff used the goals and objectives approved at the Commission meeting on March 13, 2013, to prepare this budget. In addition to the Commission's long-term goals and strategic plan, the short-term factors listed below were used to guide the development of the budget: Operational • Aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, and construction processes on the State Route (SR) 91, Interstate (I) 15, and 1-215 projects included in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice by continuing property acquisition and commencing construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project and continuing to develop tolled express lanes on 1-15. • Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in western Riverside County (Western County). • Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities. • Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A. • Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment projects. • Work with local and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of the highways and regional arterials. • Continue cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) regarding the Small Starts process to support activities for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension (Perris Valley Line) project. • Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving the County. • Support innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders with special transit needs. • Support cost controls and promote operating efficiency for transit operators. • Maintain effective partnerships among commuters, employers, and government to increase the efficiency of our transportation system by encouraging and promoting motorized and non -motorized transportation alternatives. • Continue to provide a motorist aid system that ensures safety and convenience to freeway motorists. • Maintain an active involvement in state and federal legislative matters to ensure that the Commission receives proper consideration for transportation projects and funding. • Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality -of -life needs for Riverside County. • Maintain close communication with Commissioners and educate policy makers on all issues of importance to the Commission. Financial • Fund administrative costs with allocations from Measure A, LTF, FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds. • Maintain administrative program delivery costs below the policy threshold of 4% of Measure A revenues; the FY 2013/14 Management Services budget is 2.45% of Measure A revenues. • Maintain administrative salaries and benefits at less than 1% of Measure A revenues; the FY 2013/14 administrative salaries and benefits is .92% of Measure A revenues. • Continue to maintain prudent cash reserves to provide some level of insulation for unplanned expenditures. • Maintain current positive bond ratings with rating agencies. • Move forward on Measure A projects for highways and regional arterials using sales tax revenues, TUMF revenues, and state and federal funding as well as financing alternatives such as commercial paper, sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, and federal loans. • Establish and maintain reserves for toll operations, capital improvements, and debt service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements. • Adopt toll revenue policies to establish congestion pricing in order to maximize throughput on toll facilities. • Leverage and protect past Measure A investments in rail with state and federal funding for additional rail improvements, including the Perris Valley Line. • Maintain the enterprise resource planning (ERP) system to integrate project accounting needs and improve accounting efficiency. Budget Overview Total sources (Table 1) are budgeted at $1,921,987,400, which is an increase of 279% over FY 2012/13 projected sources and a 2% increase over the FY 2012/13 revised budget. Total sources are comprised of revenues of $474,887,600, transfers in of $636,325,800, and debt proceeds of $810,774,000. The projected fund balance at June 30, 2013 available for expenditures (excluding reserves for debt service of $48,559,900 and advances receivable of $32,818,200) is $509,443,500. Accordingly, total funding available for the FY 2013/14 budget totals $2,431,430,900. Table 1— Sources FY 2012-2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Measure A Sales Tax $ 134,984,300 $ 141,000,000 $ 141,000,000 $ 147,000,000 $ 6,000,000 4% LTF Sales Tax 66,556,700 69,500,000 69,500,000 72,500,000 3,000,000 4% STA Sales Tax 13,487,500 14,212,500 14,212,500 13,298,000 (914,500) -6% Intergovernmental 51,516,900 93,758,400 64,845,100 230,839,700 137,081,300 146% TUMF Revenue 8,116,400 7,557,300 7,268,200 6,723,400 (833,900) -11% Other Revenue 1,430,100 882,800 493,500 500,000 (382,800) -43% Investment Income 4,308,300 7,265,900 3,986,300 4,026,500 (3,239,400) -45% Operating Transfers In 123,977,200 328,118,600 125,536,100 636,325,800 308,207,200 94% Debt Proceeds 40,000,000 1,220,172,000 80,000,000 810,774,000 (409,398,0001 -34% TOTAL Sources $ 444,377,400 $ 1,882,467,500 $ 506,841,700 $ 1,921,987,400 $ 39,519,900 2% Riverside County has a number of competitive advantages over nearby coastal counties (Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego): (i) housing that was (and remains) more available and affordable; and (ii) plentiful commercial real estate and available development land at lower rates. Prior to the national recession, Riverside County's economy thrived, reflecting the area's competitive advantages over its neighboring counties, largely as a result of the County's continuing ability to draw jobs, residents, and affordable housing away from the Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego county areas. As a result, the County enjoyed a more diversified employment and commercial base and an increasing share of the regional economy. During the nationwide recession, the County experienced high unemployment; reduced personal income, taxable sales, and residential building permits; a decrease in the rate of home sales and the median price of single-family residences; and high rates of notices of default on mortgage loans secured by single-family residences. The impact of the recession was amplified in the Inland Empire (i.e., Riverside and San Bernardino counties) due to its relatively greater growth and the relatively lower average income levels when compared to coastal areas. These factors resulted in fluctuating Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues and TUMF fees; however, as noted on Chart 1 the sales tax revenues appear to have stabilized since FY 2009/10. Chart 1— Commission Sources Trend $900,000,000 $800,000,000 $700,000,000 $600,000,000 $500,000,000 $400,000,000 $300,000,000 $200,000,000 $100,000,000 t Measure A Sales Tax f LTF Sales Tax t STA Sales Tax —W—TUMF —A—Federal, State, Local Revenues — *—Operating Transfers In -- DebtProceeds FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Recovery from the nationwide recession in the local Inland Empire economy has lagged the nation and other areas of California. Sales tax revenues have rebounded from the recent economic downturn's low point in 2010. The Commission's economic outlook for FY 2013/14 continues to be cautiously optimistic; however, the state and federal budget issues continue to affect funding of the Commission's capital projects and programs. Should Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues continue to fluctuate and the availability of federal and state revenues continue to be uncertain, the timing and scope of the Commission's projects and programs may be impacted. While the Commission's primary revenues are the Measure A and LTF sales taxes, other revenues and financing sources are required to fund the Commission's programs and projects as illustrated in Chart 2. Chart 2 — Sources: Major Categories Measure A Sales Tax Debt Proceeds 42% 8% LTF Sales Tax 4% STA Sales Tax 1% Intergovernmental 0 pe rating Transfe rs trn 33% 12% TUMF Revenue 0% Other Revenue O% Investment Income 0% The State Board of Equalization (SBOE) recently provided to cities and other agencies its projections that statewide taxable sales over the next fiscal year will increase 5.45%. However, given the tenuous local economy, the Commission is not basing its estimate of revenues on the SBOE's projection and will continue its conservative projection practices. After taking the state of the local economy and recent optimistic revenue trends into consideration, staff projects Measure A sales tax revenues of $147,000,000 for FY 2013/14. This is a 4% increase from the FY 2012/13 revised projection of $141,000,000. At midyear the Commission will reassess sales tax revenue projections based on the economy and revenue trends. On behalf of the County, the Commission administers the LTF for public transportation needs, local streets and roads, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The majority of LTF funding received by the County and available for allocation is distributed to all public transit operators in the County, and the Commission receives allocations for administration, planning, and programming in addition to funding for rail operations included in the commuter rail Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The LTF sales tax revenue received from the State is budgeted at $72,500,000; an increase of 4% from the FY 2012/13 revised projection of $69,500,000. STA funds generated from the statewide sales tax on motor vehicle fuel are allocated by formula by the State Controller to the Commission for allocations to the County's public transit operators; however, these funds have been subject to suspension in past years due to the State's budget issues. The STA transit allocation, which is based on recent State estimates, for FY 2013/14 is $13,298,000. Intergovernmental revenues include reimbursement revenues from federal sources of $94,389,000, state sources of $133,496,300, and local agencies of $2,954,400 for highway and rail capital, rail operations and station maintenance, commuter assistance, and motorist assistance programs as well as planning and programming activities. Reimbursement revenues vary from year to year depending on project activities and funding levels. As a result of an amended Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Commission will receive 48.7% of TUMF revenues (as updated by the most recent Nexus study). TUMF represents fees assessed on new residential and commercial development in Western County. FY 2013/14 TUMF fees are expected to remain flat at $6,300,000 to reflect the slow but encouraging signs in the housing market in the Inland Empire, and additional TUMF zone reimbursements of $423,400 are expected for the 74/215 interchange project. Other revenue of $500,000 is projected to decrease 43% from the prior year's budget of $882,800 and is related to property management revenues from properties acquired in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Investment income is anticipated to decrease in FY 2013/14 as a result of increased activity with the Perris Valley Line and the SR-91 corridor improvement projects. Staff continues to actively manage its resources and make appropriate investments to maximize the return to the Commission without sacrificing security and affecting short- term cash requirements. Transfers in of $636,325,800 relate primarily to the transfer of available debt proceeds for highway and regional arterial projects; LTF funding for general administration, planning and programming, rail operations and station maintenance, and grade separation project allocations; approved interfund allocations for specific projects; and debt service requirements from highway, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects. Debt proceeds consist of the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes related to the 1-15 and 1-215 corridor improvements projects, $404,646,000 and $207,512,000, including bond premiums of $68,616,000, in sales tax and toll revenue bonds, and a $110,000,000 federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Total uses (Table 2), including transfers out of $636,325,800, are budgeted at $1,669,479,000, an increase of 72% from the prior year budget amount of $970,284,000. Program expenditures and transfers out totaling $1,520,181,300 represent 91% of total budgeted uses in FY 2013/14. Program costs have increased by 87% from $813,841,800 in FY 2012/13. Table 2 — Uses FY 2012-2014 Capital Highway, Rail, and Regional Arterials Capital Local Streets and Roads Commuter Assistance Debt Service Management Services Motorist Assistance Planning and Programming Public and Specialized Transit Rail Maintenance and Operations TOTAL Uses FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget $ 238,856,700 $ 637,362,200 40,127,900 42,129,000 3,317,600 4,190,100 61,532,600 143,413,000 17, 714, 600 13, 029, 200 4,942,900 6,169,300 3,399,900 4,994,100 68,068,600 104,443,800 20,202, 600 14, 553,300 $ 458,163,400 $ 970,284,000 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change 311,301,700 $ 1,322,975,400 $ 685,613,200 108% 42,129,000 43,825,900 1,696,900 4% 4,348,700 4,523,900 333,800 8% 22,990,600 135,712,300 (7,700,700) -5% 11,934,000 13,585,400 556,200 4% 6,048,900 6,755,500 586,200 10% 3,538,600 5,845,000 850,900 17% 77,742,900 120,770,000 16,326,200 16% 11,564,300 15,485,600 A2,300 6% 491,598,700 $ 1,669,479,000 $ 699,195,000 72% Note: Management Services includes Executive Management, Administration, Legislative Affairs and Communications, and Finance. Capital highway, rail, and regional arterials budgeted uses of $1,322,975,400 are 108% higher compared to the FY 2012/13 budget due to project activities on the Perris Valley Line and significant right of way activities and commencement of construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project in addition to transfers out of debt proceeds from capital projects funds to special revenue funds to finance 2009 Measure A Western County highway project costs as well as to debt service funds. Local streets and roads expenditures of $43,825,900 reflect an increase of 4% over the FY 2012/13 budget and represent the disbursements to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. Debt Service of $135,712,300 has decreased 5% as a result of the retirement of $80 million of outstanding commercial paper notes in FY 2013/14 from sales tax revenue bond proceeds issued in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project financing. Additionally, debt service requirements related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project current plan of finance are lower than estimated in the prior plan of finance. Commuter Assistance budgeted expenditures of $4,523,900 are 8% higher than FY 2012/13 budget due to increased expenditures related to projects and operations activities. Management Services expenditures have increased 4% from the FY 2012/13 budget due to information technology equipment upgrades. Motorist Assistance expenditures have increased 10% or $586,200 from the FY 2012/13 budget as a result of increased demand for freeway service patrol services supporting construction projects. Planning and Programming budgeted expenditures of $5,845,000 reflect a 17% increase from the FY 2012/13 budget due to increased projects and operations activities in connection with LTF disbursements for planning and programming and grade separation projects. Public and Specialized Transit budgeted expenditures of $120,770,000 are 16% higher than FY 2012/13 budget due to increased transit capital expenditures for public transit. The 6% increase in Rail Maintenance and Operation's budgeted expenditures of $15,485,600 is primarily due to additional consultant work needed to perform planning and modeling for rail projects including the SR-91/Perris Valley Line expansion and Coachella Valley rail service. Total uses included in the FY 2013/14 budget by major categories are illustrated in Chart 3. Chart 3 — Uses: Major Categories Planning and Programming 0% MotoriSt Assisrarl re 1% Management Services 1% Debt Servitor dx CommuterAsslstance - O% Capital local Streets and Roads 3% Commission Personnel Publlcand Spedallzed Transit 7% Rad Maintenance and �Opt/4nm 1% Capital H iahray. Rail, and 1p Regional Artcrialt 74% The Commission's salary and benefits total $7,949,400 for FY 2013/14. This represents an increase of $978,300 or 14% over the FY 2012/13 budget of $6,971,100 (Chart 4). The increase relates to the addition of four full-time equivalents (FTE); market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; a 3% cost of living adjustment to offset the employee's contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Beginning with FY 2013/14, the Commission has implemented a phased approach over a three-year period requiring employees to pay their share of normal pension costs. The current 8% employer -paid member contribution by the Commission will be eliminated in FY 2015/16. Chart 4 — Salary and Benefits Costs: Five -Year Comparison $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- 1 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 The FY 2013/14 FTE of 46 positions has increased compared to the FY 2012/13 level (Table 3) and reflects an increase of four FTEs for the recruitment of a capital projects manager, facilities administrator, human resources administrator, and a planning and programming director. The Commission is preparing for significant organization changes that include large transportation capital projects resulting in toll operations and the investment of billions of dollars requiring substantial attention at many staff levels. Management continues to be firmly committed to the intent of the Commission's enabling legislation that called for a small staff. Staff will continue to be provided the tools needed to ensure an efficient and productive work environment. However, it must be recognized that small is not viewed in an absolute context; it is relative to the required tasks to be performed and the demands to be met. Table 3 - Full -Time Equivalents by Department FY 2012-2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Executive Management 0.3 0.4 Administration 5.3 4.6 Legislative Affairs and Communications 1.9 2.0 Finance 7.0 6.6 Planning and Programming 4.8 4.8 Rail Maintenance and Operations 3.2 3.3 Public and Specialized Transit 2.5 2.4 Commuter Assistance 1.6 1.6 Motorist Assistance 1.2 1.2 Capital Project Development and Delivery 12.2 15.1 FY 13/14 TOTAL 0.3 5.5 2.4 6.9 5.3 4.0 2.4 1.8 1.2 16.2 40.0 42.0 46.0 The Commission provides a comprehensive package of benefits to all permanent, salaried employees. The package includes: health, dental, vision, and life insurance, short and long-term disability, workers' compensation, tuition assistance, sick and vacation leave, retirement benefits in the form of participation in California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS), postretirement health care, deferred compensation, and employee assistance program. The compensation components are shown in Chart 5. Chart 5 - Personnel Salary and Benefits Other Fringes 7% 11. &_ Health 13% Retirement 17% Department Initiatives Salary 63% The preparation of each department's budget was based on key assumptions, accomplishments in FY 2012/13, major initiatives for FY 2013/14, and department goals and related objectives. Following are the key initiatives and summary of expenditures for each department (Tables 4 through 13). Executive Management • Continue project development and delivery as the key Measure A priority. • Initiate construction on Riverside County's largest transportation project, the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • Advance public transit with the construction of the Perris Valley Line making this Riverside County's first major rail expansion in more than 14 years. • Advocate for state investments in transportation and approval of a federal transportation bill to fund needed transportation priorities in the County and stimulate the local economy. • Maintain regional cooperation and collaboration as a significant effort consistent with the philosophy and mission of the Commission. • Enhance external communications with media, business and civic groups, and the community. • Maintain an effective mid -sized transportation agency with a small and dedicated staff. Table 4 - Executive Management FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 105,200 $ 120,600 $ 83,000 $ 96,700 $ (23,900) -20% Professional 69,900 105,000 101,100 105,000 0% Support 39,600 57,600 53,700 57,200 (400, -1% TOTAL $ 214,700 $ 283,200 5 237,800 $ 258,900 5 (24,300) -9% Administration • Provide high quality support services to the Commission and to internal and external customers. • Continue to strengthen the electronic records management system. • Continue to provide timely communications to Commissioners with continued emphasis on the utilization of electronic mail. • Continue to update technology to streamline processes and provide easier access to Commission records. • Support and develop a motivated workforce with a framework of activities and practices that comply with employment laws and regulations. Table 5 - Administration FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 434,000 $ 460,300 $ 398,200 $ 628,600 $ 168,300 37% Professional 239,000 260,700 141,000 207,600 (53,100) -20% Support 547,700 641,200 601,800 644,200 3,000 0% Capital Outlay 17,400 140,000 55,000 385,000 245,000 175% Debt Service 25,200 - N/A TOTAL $ 1,263,300 $ 1,502,200 $ 1,196,000 $ 1,865,400 5 363,200 24% Legislative Affairs and Communications • Continue efforts to protect and seek greater state and federal investment in transportation infrastructure and goods movement. • Develop effective partnerships with transportation providers to communicate a unified message to Congress regarding mobility needs. • Advocate positions in the State Legislature and in Congress that advance the County's transportation interests, especially those related to the implementation of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • Continue a leadership role in formulating a countywide direction on federal transportation policies. • Take a leadership role on the modernization of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). • Continue to develop a broad public information program regarding the Commission's responsibilities and accomplishments through a variety of media formats and presentation opportunities. • Continue to place an emphasis on providing proactive public communications support related to major project development efforts. • Conduct a concerted outreach effort to new federal and state representatives on local transportation issues. • Provide new Commissioner orientation meetings and other continuing education opportunities for Commissioners. Table 6 - Legislative Affairs and Communications FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 347,100 $ 395,000 $ 351,200 $ 506,700 $ 111,700 28% Professional 425,400 661,300 456,200 552,563 (108,800) -16% Support 155,400 188,000 145,800 189,200 1,200 1% TOTAL $ 927,900 $ 1,244,300 $ 953,200 $ 1,248,400 $ 4,100 0% Finance • Continue appropriate uses of long- and short-term financing to advance 2009 Measure A projects of the Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). • Apply the sales tax revenue forecast update to develop a financing plan to support the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan and CVAG highway and regional arterial projects. • Continue to keep abreast of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) technical activities affecting the Commission's accounting and financial reporting activities and consider early implementation of new pronouncements. • Continue to strengthen the ERP system to benefit all staff in the management of accounting and project information and automation of a paperless workflow system. • Continue to implement a centralized procurements process in order to strengthen controls and ensure consistency in the application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable laws and regulations. • Conduct outreach activities to encourage disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) and small business enterprise (SBE) participation in various contracts. Table 7 - Finance FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 832,600 $ 828,600 $ 774,000 $ 840,300 $ 11,700 1% Professional 3,977,800 3,514,100 3,119,900 3,701,700 187,600 5% Support 516,500 656,800 647,600 664,700 7,900 1% Capital Outlay 7,000 5,500 6,000 6,000 N/A Transfers Out 10,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 0% TOTAL $ 15,333,900 $ 9,999,500 $ 9,547,000 $ 10,212,700 $ 213,200 2y,. Planning and Programming ■ Monitor funding authority and responsibility related to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and impacts on the STIP caused by the state budget issues. • Ensure STIP and Proposition 1B funded projects are administered and implemented consistent with California Transportation Commission (CTC) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) policies. • Continue to strategically program projects and obligate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding, including monitoring the use of such funding to prevent funds from lapsing. • Focus on interregional concerns and maintain effective working relationships involving various multi -county transportation issues, including goods movement. ■ Coordinate planning efforts with regional and local agencies relating to the development of regional transportation plans (RTP) and green house gas reduction implementation guidelines. • Secure funding through the federal transportation bill for goods movement -related needs. • Monitor and track the TUMF regional arterial projects. • Work cooperatively with member agencies to continue the work efforts on the new Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) corridors. • Continue the Congestion Management Program (CMP) update and traffic monitoring along urban and rural highway systems. • Administer the SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. • Monitor the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach's (Ports) projects for impacts on Riverside County. Table 8 - Planning and Programming Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations Capital Outlay TOTAL FY 11/12 Actual $ 904,800 132,900 17,400 2,323,600 21,200 S 3,399,900 FY 12/13 Revised Budget $ 835,800 362,800 24,300 3,771,200 FY 12/13 Projected $ 959,200 $ 198,000 16,400 2,365,000 $ 4,994,100 $ 3,538,600 $ FY 13/14 Budget 1,032,700 487,500 23,300 4,301,500 Dollar Percent Change Change $ 196,900 24% 124,700 34% (1,000) -4% 530,300 14% N/A 5,845,000 $ 850,900 17% Rail Maintenance and Operations • Continue active participation in governance and operations of the Metrolink commuter rail system. • Continue the planning and implementation of capital improvements at the commuter rail stations in Riverside County, including the Perris Valley Line, security and rehabilitation projects, and parking requirements. • Continue to support activities related to the Perris Valley Line project and evaluate its operational impact. • Establish best approach to build, maintain, and operate cost effective and environmentally sustainable facilities that meet the public's transportation needs. • Continue coordination with CVAG, Amtrak and the State to focus attention on the creation of intercity passenger rail service between Coachella Valley, the Pass Area, Riverside, and the Los Angeles basin. Table 9 - Rail Maintenance and Operations FY 11/12 Actual Personnel $ 488,700 Professional 206,000 Support 1,260,100 Projects and Operations 18,225,900 Capital Outlay 21,900 TOTAL S 20,202,600 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Revised Budget Projected $ 496,700 $ 613,200 $ 421,000 256,900 1,735,600 1,455,900 11,834,300 9,181,900 65,700 56,400 $ 14,553,300 $ 11,564,300 $ FY 13/14 Budget 636,500 $ 588,000 1,723,700 12,489,200 48,200 15,485,600 $ Dollar Percent Change Change 139,800 28% 167,000 40% (11,900) -1% 654,900 6% (17,500) -27% 932,300 6% Public and Specialized Transit ■ Support innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders having very special transit needs and monitor funding of these programs. • Complete the second year of specialized transit funding allocations related to the 2011 universal call for projects and continue to monitor performance. • Continue long-range planning activities to ensure that anticipated revenues are in line with projected levels of service by transit operators. • Monitor public and specialized transit operators' performance through the TransTrack program. • Provide availability for local matching funds to Western County applicants seeking FTA Section 5310 federal capital grants. ■ Coordinate with operators on major capital purchases and investments into new rolling stock and other system improvements in order to maintain a viable on -hand reserve. Table 10 - Public and Specialized Transit FY 11/12 Actual Personnel $ 326,600 Professional 146,100 Support 8,400 Projects and Operations 52,677,000 Transfers Out 14,910,500 TOTAL $ 68,068,600 Commuter Assistance FY 12/13 Revised Budget $ 326,200 291,500 18,900 84,174,600 19,632,600 $ 104,443,800 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget $ 296,100 $ 380,100 $ 274,600 188,500 13,500 24,500 58,822, 300 106,210,800 18,336,400 13,966,100 $ 77,742,900 $ 120,770,000 $ Dollar Change 53,900 (103,000) 5,600 22,036,200 (5,666,500) 16,326,200 Percenk Change 17% -35% 30% -29% 16% ■ Improve the suite of services and outreach to rideshare participants and employer partners, including personalized information and electronic access and distribution. ■ Maintain and grow employer partnerships through value-added services and tools for ridesharing programs. • Maintain and operate a four -county ridematching database system with partner agencies. • Maintain long-term partnership with San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to manage and implement a "sister" Commuter Assistance program for residents and employers in San Bernardino County. ■ Optimize park and ride facilities to support car/vanpool/buspool arrangements and facilitate transit connections. Table 11- Commuter Assistance Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Transfers Out TOTAL FY 11/12 Actual $ 216,000 $ 588,000 366,900 1,986,700 160,000 $ 3,317,600 $ FY 12/13 Revised Budget 218,900 650,300 529,200 2,623,400 17,000 151,300 4,190,100 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change $ 375,200 $ 300,800 $ 81,900 37% 754,800 817,800 167,500 26% 469,100 483,300 (45,900) -9% 2,588,300 2,802,800 179,400 7% 10,000 7,000 (10,000) -59% 151,300 112,200 139,1001 -26% $ 4,348,700 $ 4,523,900 $ 333,800 8% Motorist Assistance • Assess opportunities for efficiency related to the call box program operations. • Maintain a high benefit -to -cost ratio related to the performance of the FSP program. • Operate and maintain the 1E511 system in accordance with national 511 implementation standards in partnership with SANBAG. • Enhance the 1E511 with more personalized traffic information services. • Utilize the opportunity to enhance coordination between California Highway Patrol (CHP) and Caltrans on traveler information. Table 12 - Motorist Assistance Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 149,200 $ 175,900 $ 175,900 $ 187,200 $ 11,300 6% 789,600 717,500 736,500 766,500 49,000 7% 515,400 884,600 880,200 875,900 (8,700) -1% 2,392,100 3,070,000 2,935,000 3,635,000 565,000 18% 1,096,600 1,321,300 1,321,300 1,290,900 (30,400) -2% $ 4,942,900 $ 6,169,300 $ 6,048,900 $ 6,755,500 $ 586,200 10% Capital Project Development and Delivery • Continue project development, right of way, and construction activities on remaining 1989 Measure A projects including SR-74 curve widening, SR-91 high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange, and 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors. • Continue project activities on the 1-215 bi-county highway and Perris Valley Line rail projects, which were included in both the 1989 Measure A and 2009 Measure A programs. • Continue project work on the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan projects, including the 91/71 connectors; the SR-91, 1-15, and 1-215 corridor mobility improvement projects; SR-79 realignment; and Mid County Parkway. • Provide Western County Measure A regional arterial TUMF funding and support to local jurisdictions for regional arterial project engineering, right of way acquisition, and construction. • Provide 2009 Measure A funding to the incorporated cities, CVAG and the County for local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction. • Provide advance funding and support of 2009 Measure A highway and regional arterial projects. • Develop strategies to implement alternative financing structures including public toll roads. • Maintain a right of way acquisition and management program in support of capital projects. • Manage right of way acquisition in the most cost effective manner and within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. • Maintain and manage the access, use, safety, and security of Commission -owned properties including commuter rail stations, properties in acquisition process, and income -generating properties. Table 13 — Capital Project Development and Delivery FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 2,268,400 $ 3,113,100 $ 2,934,200 $ 3,339,800 $ 226,700 7% Professional 5,057,500 7,692,500 7,321,700 19,260,400 11,567,900 150% Support 300,700 597,100 302,900 907,300 310,200 52% Projects and Operations 173,405,700 365,850,100 242,066,500 726,987,200 361,137,100 99% Capital Outlay 142,200 225,000 78,300 350,000 125,000 56% Debt Service 61,507,400 143,413,000 22,990,600 135,712,300 (7,700,700) -5% Transfers Out 97,810,100 302,013,400 100,727,100 615,956,600 313,943,200 104% TOTAL $ 340,492,000 $ 822,904,200 $ 376,421,300 $ 1,502,513,600 $ 679,609,400 83% Fund Balances The total fund balance as of June 30, 2013 is projected at $590,821,600. The Commission's budgeted activities for FY 2013/14 are expected to result in a $252,508,400 increase of total fund balance at June 30, 2014 to $843,330,000. The primary cause of the increase is related to the completion of financing activities in FY 2013/14 related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Table 14 presents the components of fund balance by governmental fund type and program at June 30, 2014. Table 14 — Projected Fund Balances by Governmental Fund Type and Program at June 30, 2014 General Fund $8,091,200 Riverside Co unty Transportation Commission $643,330,000 Special Revenue Funds 5413,294,200 Capital Projects Funds $274.420.100 Deist Se re ice Fund $1.47,521,509 Management Services $4,337,400 Measure A Western County: Planning and Programming 1,465,100 Bond Financing $4,671,500 Rail Maintenance and Operations 2,288,700 Commuter Assistance 13,476,600 Economic Development 3,737,800 Highways 103,827,000 Local Streets and Roads 1,100 New Corridors 54,310,400 Public and Specialized Transit 7,821,000 Rail 37,740,500 Regional Arterials 23,836,900 Measure A Coachella Valley: Highways and Regional Arterial 4,286,800 Local Streets and Roads 1,600 Specialized Transit 1,361,200 Measure A Palo Verde Valley Local Streets and Roads 600 Motorist Assistance 5,221,100 State Transit Assistance 42,788,800 Local Transportation Fund 86,030,100 TUMF: CETAP 17,040,200 Regional Arterials 7,141,000 Budget Summary Highways $ 274,420,100 The overall budget for FY 2013/14 is presented in Table 15 by summarized line items, Table 16 by operating and capital classifications, and Table 17 by governmental fund type. Highway, rail, and regional arterial program expenditures by project are summarized in Table 18. Table 15 — Budget Comparative by Summarized Line Item FY 2012-2014 Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations- General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE FY 11/12 Actual 134, 984, 300 66,556,700 13,487,500 28,097,000 21,411,300 2,0013,600 8,116,400 1,430,100 4,308,300 280,400,200 6,072,600 11,632,200 3.728.100 15,360,300 11,194,200 21,366,500 27,451,200 16,285,700 53, 728,100 71,658,200 236,500 40,127,900 8.962.700 FY 12/13 Revised Budget 141,000,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 73,151,900 17,917,800 2,688,700 7,557,300 882,800 7,265,900 334,176,900 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget $ 141,000,000 $ 147,000,000 69,500,000 72,500,000 14, 212, 500 13, 298, 000 40,949,200 94,389,003 21, 306, 500 133, 496, 300 2,589,400 2,954,400 7,268,200 6,723,400 493,500 500,000 3,986,300 4,026,500 301,305,600 474,8/37,600 6,971,100 6,960,200 7,949,400 14,676,700 5.333.300 20,010,000 18,880,500 27,932,000 125,994,100 29,050,000 112,246,800 97,835,800 800,000 42,129,000 16,455,400 13,360,700 26,675,500 4.586.900 5.593.300 17,947,600 32,268,800 14,255,600 20,107,100 16,580,400 20,360,030 61,628,000 240,968,403 29,050,000 217,750,000 64, 716, 400 164, 707, 800 68, 779, 200 122, 610, 800 320,000 939,000 42,129,000 43,825,900 20.500.400 25,157,500 Dollar Percent Change Change $ 6,000,003 4% 3,000,000 4% (914,500) -6% 21,237,100 29% 115,578,500 645% 265,700 10% (833,900) -11% (382,800) -43% (3,239,400) -45% 140,710,700 42% 978,300 i 11,998,800 260,000 12,258,803 82% 5% 61% 1,226,600 6% (7,572,000) -27% 114,974,300 91% 188,700,000 650% 52,461,000 47% 24,775,000 25% 139,000 17% 1,696,900 4% 8.702.100 53% 251,011,000 471,323,600 317,959,000 856,426,503 385,102,900 82% 46,523,900 126,800,000 15, 008, 700 16, 613, 000 61,532,600 209,700 334,186.200 143,413,000 447,700 642,165,400 6,800,000 87,100,000 16,190,600 41,112,300 7,500,000 22,990,600 205,200 366,062,600 135,712,300 796,200 1,033,153,200 (39,700,000) 24,499,300 7.500,000 (7,700,700) 348,500 390,987,800 -31% 147% N/A -5% 78% 61% (53,786,000) (307,988,500) (64,757,000) (558,265,600) (250,277,100) 81% 123, 977, 200 (123,977,200) 40,000,000 328,118,600 (328,118,600) 1,220,172,000 125,536,100 636,325,800 308,207,200 94% (125,536,100) (636,325,800) (308,207,200) 94% 80,000,000 700,774,030 (519,398,000) -43% 110.000.003 110.000.000 N/A 40.000,000 1,220,172,000 80,000,000 810,774,000 (409,398,000) -34% (13,786,000) 912,183,500 15,243,000 252,508,400 (659,675,100) -72% 589,364.600 575,578,600 575,578,600 590,821.600 15,243,000 3% $ 575.578,600 $ 1,487,762,100 $ 590,821,600 $ 843,330,000 $ 5644,432,100) -43% Table 16 - Operating and Capital Budget FY 2013/14 Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way and Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) FY 13/14 Operating Budget $ 14,018,000 72, 500, 000 13, 298, 000 751,400 5,299,000 2,498,400 410,900 108, 775, 700 4,600,400 4,716,900 4,664,000 FY 13/14 Capital Budget $ 132,982,000 93, 637, 600 128,197,300 456,000 6,723,400 500,000 3,615,600 366,111, 900 3,349,000 21, 958, 600 929,300 FY 13/14 TOTAL Budget $ 147,000,000 72, 500,000 13,298,000 94,389,000 133,496,300 2,954,400 6,723,400 500,000 4,026,500 474,887,600 7,949,400 26,675,500 5,593,300 9,380,900 7,909,500 5,000 120,610,800 914,000 22, 887,900 12,197, 600 20,355,000 240,968,400 217, 750, 000 164, 707,800 2,000,000 25,000 43,825,900 25,157, 500 32, 268,800 20,107,100 20,360,000 240,968,400 217,750,000 164,707,800 122,610,800 939,000 43,825,900 25,157,500 129,439,300 726, 987, 200 87,100, 000 41,112, 300 7,500,000 856,426,500 87,100,000 41,112, 300 7,500,000 446,200 135, 712, 300 350,000 135,712,300 796,200 143, 866, 800 889, 286,400 1,033,153, 200 (35,091,100) 16, 846, 600 (15, 369, 200) (523,174, 500) 619,479, 200 (620, 956, 600) 700, 774, 000 110, 000, 000 (558, 265,600) 636,325,800 (636,325,800) 700,774,000 110,000,000 1,477,400 809, 296,600 810,774,000 (33,613,700) 286,122,100 252,508,400 Beginning Fund Balance 198,403,700 392,417,900 590.821,600 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 164 790,000 $ 678,540,000 $ 843,330,000 Table 17 — Budget by Governmental Fund Type FY 2013/14 FY 13/14 General Fund Special Revenue Capital Projects Debt Service TOTAL Budget Revenues Measure A Sales Tax $ 2,800,000 $ 144,200,000 $ - $ $ 147,000,000 LTF Sales Tax - 72,500,000 72,500,000 STASales Tax 13,298,000 - 13,298,000 Federal Reimbursements 25,000 91,620,000 2,744,000 94,389,000 State Reimbursements 1,119,000 132,377,300 - 133,496,300 Local Reimbursements 224,800 2,729,600 - 2,954,400 TUMF Revenue 6,723,400 - 6,723,400 Other Revenue - 500,000 - 500,030 Investment Income 20,200 1,030,400 1,877,700 1,098,200 4,026,500 TOTAL Revenues 4,189,000 464,978,700 1,877,700 3,842,200 474,887,600 Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits 3,991,700 3,957,700 - 7,949,400 Professional and Support Professional Services 3,024,100 21,615,000 1,248,100 788,300 26,675,500 Support Costs 3,292,700 2,300,600 5,593,300 TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 6,316,800 23,915,600 1,248,100 788,300 32,268,800 Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 1,471,700 18,635,400 20,107,100 Engineering 5,000 20,355,000 20,360,003 Construction 240,968,400 240,963,400 Design Build 217,750,000 217,750,000 Right of Way/Land 164,707,800 164,707,800 Operating and Capital Disbursements 14,4)0,000 108,210,800 122,610,800 Special Studies 914,000 25,000 939,000 Local Streets and Roads - 43,825,900 43,825,900 Regional Arterials - 25,157,500 25,157,503 TOTAL Projects and Operations 16,790,700 839,635,800 - 856,426,500 Debt Service Principal Payments 80,000,000 7,100,000 87,100,000 Interest Payments 100,000 41,012,300 41,112,300 Cost of Issuance 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 TOTAL Debt Service - 87,600,000 48,112,300 135,712,300 Capital Outlay 439,200 357,000 - 796,200 TOTAL Expenditures 27,538,400 867,866,100 88,848,100 48,900,600 1,033,153,200 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (23,349,400) (402,887,400) (86,970,400) (45,058,4430) (558,265,600) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 14,896,600 387,406,200 80,000,000 154,023,000 636,325,800 Transfers Out (66,075,200) (560,250,600) (10,000,000) (636,325,800) Debt Proceeds 700,774,000 - 700,774,000 TIFIA Loan Proceeds - 110,000,000 - 110,000,000 Net Financing Sources (Uses) 14,896,600 321,331,000 330,522,400 14,3,023,000 810,774,00) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) (8,452,800) (81,556,400) 243,553,000 98,964,600 252,508,400 Beginning Fund Balance 16,544,000 494,850,600 30,1367,100 48,559, 900 590,821,600 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 8,091,200 $ 413,294,200 $ 274,420 100 $ 147,524,500 $ 843,330,000 Table 18 — Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs FY 2013/14 Description Projects and operations Bechtel program management $ 9,200,000 SCRRA program management 1,200,000 Other 1,797,600 TOTAL PROJECTS -GENERAL $ 12,197,600 Highway engineering 91/71 interchange improvement project $ 4,600,000 1-15 corridor improvements 7,000,000 1-215 corridor improvement southbound connector 950,000 Mid County Parkway 2,550,000 SR-91 corridor improvements 1.00,000 SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange 32,000 General _ 1.00,000 SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY ENGINEERING 15,332,000 Regional arterial engineering Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including SR-79 realignment Rail engineering CCTV operations center General SUBTOTAL RAIL ENGINEERING TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL ENGINEERING 4,823,000 200,000 5.000 205,000 20.360.000 Highway construction 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors $ 1,055,000 74/215interchange 750,000 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road 45,500,000 1-215 corridor improvements (south widening segment)/I-15 to Scott Road 1,700,000 I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening 2,057,300 1-15/Los Alamos Road bridge replacement 900,000 SR-74curve widening 3,410,000 SR-91 corridor improvements 3,800,000 SR-91/La Sierra Avenue interchange 33,000 SR-91 HOV lanes/Mary Street to 7th Street 150,000 SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION 59,355,300 Regional arterial construction Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including SR-79 widening/Thompson to Domenigoni Various Western County Measure A regional arterial projects SUBTOTAL REGIONAL ARTERIAL CONSTRUCTION 41,484,100 2,300,000 43,784,100 Rail construction Riverside station pedestrian improvements 1,152,000 CCTV operations center 1,150,000 Station rehabilitation 2,2613,000 Perris Valley Line and other rail projects 133,197,000 North Main Corona station parking structure 20,000 Perris Multimodal Facility 50,000 SUBTOTAL RAIL CONSTRUCTION 137,829,000 TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAILCONSTRUCTION $ 240,968,400 Highway design build SR-91 corridor improvements TOTAL HIGHWAY DESIGN BUILD $ 217,750,000 $ 217,750,000 Highway right of way and land 74/215 interchange $ 30,000 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors 274,000 1-215 corridor improvement (central segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road 730,000 Mid County Parkway 6,182,000 SR-74curve widening 310,000 SR-74/1-15 to 7th Street 30,000 91/71 interchange improvement project 3,335,000 SR-91 corridor improvements 135,310,000 SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange 11,444,000 Western County Multi -species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) 3,000,000 General 20,000 SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND 160,665,000 Regional arterial right of way and land Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects 3,545,800 Rail right of way and land Perris Multimodal Facility 10,000 Perris Valley Line and other rail projects 427,000 General 60,000 SUBTOTAL RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND 497,000 TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND $ 164,707,800 GRAND TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL PROGRAMS $ 655,983,800 Gann Appropriations limit In November 1979, the voters of the State approved Proposition 4, commonly known as the Gann Initiative. The Proposition created Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, placing limits on the amount of revenue that can be spent by public agencies from the "proceeds of taxes." In 1980, the State Legislature added Section 7910 to the Government Code, providing that the governing body of each local jurisdiction must establish, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the following year. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year is equal to the previous year's limit adjusted for population changes and changes in the California per capita income. The Commission is subject to the requirements of Article XIIIB. Gann appropriations limits are calculated for and applied to the Commission. In accordance with the requirements of Article XIIIB implementing legislation, the Board approved Resolution No. 13-009 on June 12, 2013, establishing appropriations limits for the Commission at $370,426,988. The FY 2013/14 budget appropriated $190,640,700 in taxes for the Commission, falling well within the limits set by the Gann Initiative. Based on historic trends and future projections, it appears the Commission's use of the proceeds of taxes, as defined by Article XIIIB, will continue to fall below the appropriations limit. The calculation for the FY 2013/14 appropriations limit is as follows: 2012-2013 Appropriations Limit $ 348,861,382 2013-2014 adjustment: Change in California per capita personal income Change in Population, Riverside County 5.12% 1.01% Per Capital Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 5.12 + 100 = 1.0512 100 Population converted to a ratio: 1.01 + 100 = 1.0101 100 Calculation of factor for FY 2013-2014: 1.0512 x 1.0101 = 1.06181712 $348,861,382 X 1.06181712 = $370,426,988 2013-2014 Appropriations Limit $370,426,988 Source: California per capita income — California Department of Finance Population, Riverside County — California Department of Finance Rivnrside County tronsportotion Commission tttlitm 1 u PAltbt Commission Policy Goals and Objectives In addition to financial and administration policies, the Commission has seven long-term policy goals: promote mobility, mitigate and address the impact of goods movement, encourage economic development, ensure improved system efficiencies, foster environmental stewardship, support transportation choices through intermodalism and accessibility, and prioritize public and agency communications. For each of these policy goals, the objectives and initiatives that were considered in the framework of the work plan for the FY 2013/14 budget are identified below. While Riverside County shows modest signs of economic recovery, the Commission remains cautious about revenue availability. The need for better transportation remains a top public priority, and the Commission is poised to address this challenge via the seven policy goals. In moving forward with an aggressive program of projects and services, the Commission will face fluctuating Measure A, TUMF, and TDA revenues and uncertainty regarding the availability of federal and state transportation revenues. Due to the long-term nature of many of the Commission's programs, many of the policy goals' objectives and initiatives are ongoing from year to year. Promote Mobility The Commission, in cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies, will strive to create a transportation system that promotes efficient mobility both within the County and region. • Continue to aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, and construction processes on key components of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan, which includes the SR-91, 1-15, and 1-215 corridor improvement projects. • Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice by: o Continuing property acquisition and commencing construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project through Corona, which includes the extension of tolled express lanes (91 Express Lanes) into Riverside County; and o Continuing to develop a tolled express lane system on 1-15 between SR-60 and Cajalco Road. • Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley, including CVAG and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities. • Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A and determine use(s) for any unexpended revenues. • Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the Mid County Parkway and SR- 79 realignment projects. • Continue to work with state and federal agencies to fund and construct projects programmed in the STIP, Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), Proposition 16 bond programs, and Measure A program as well as other high priority regional projects. • Maximize obtaining all available transportation funds and strategically program funds to meet funding deadlines and to prevent the lapse and loss of funds. • Leverage the effective application and use of Measure A Western County regional arterial and other state and federal funds to deliver eligible regional arterial projects. • Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the TUMF Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in Western County. • Actively participate in the 5R-91 Advisory Committee to facilitate near and long-term improvements to SR-91, enhance intercounty public transit options, and foster mobility improvements between the two counties. • Advocate streamlining efforts at the state and federal levels that will reduce costs, time, and delays currently associated with project delivery including, but not limited to, timely project reviews and approvals. • Continue to coordinate and provide public access to commuter information via the 1E511 system and focus commuter assistance and 1E511 outreach efforts under one brand. • Continue cooperation with the FTA regarding the Small Starts process to support the initiation of the Perris Valley Line commuter rail service in 2015. • Continue to work with the public transit operators to control costs and increase system efficiencies in order to accommodate fluctuating revenues from local, state and federal sources. • Continue to develop transit service to further promote seamless intracity, intercity, and regional transit connectivity for County residents. Mitigate and Address the Impact of Goods Movement The Commission will work with federal, state, and local governments to facilitate the movement of goods and services to, within, and through the County, recognizing the vital role goods movement mobility plays in the economic health of the County, the State, and the nation. • Seek funding and local agency concurrence to implement the Commission's approved, high -priority railroad grade separation list to mitigate the impact of increased goods movement demands on the transportation system. • Encourage Congress to create a federal freight trust fund, or similar program with a dedicated and firewalled revenue structure, in order to treat the nation's multimodal national goods movement network as a system rather than individual projects. • Remain committed to a regional approach regarding goods movement issues in order to maximize funding from state and federal sources to goods movement needs in Southern California. • Continue working with the Ports and regional transportation commissions to develop a funding mechanism for needed projects and mitigation on a regional basis. Encourage Economic Development Transportation decisions will consider the economic benefits derived from any improvement, and, where feasible and practical, will pursue transportation alternatives that enhance or complement economic development. • Commit to seek opportunities related to transportation projects that will create jobs and improve the economic base in the County. • Support local agencies in the design and construction of interchanges that are in proximity to regional economic centers and developments. • Support local projects, consistent with countywide transportation goals, which enhance business development, local employment, and area tourism. Ensure Improved System Efficiencies The Commission will select projects and allocate funds in a manner that will improve safety and reduce congested traffic corridors. • Advocate the development and use of advanced technologies for transportation applications that are affordable and practical. • In partnership with SANBAG, implement enhancements to the 1E511 mobile application for improved deployment of real-time traffic information, real-time bus and rail transit trip planning information, and rideshare information available to commuters for the purpose of trip planning and reducing congestion. • Assure the effectiveness of transit planning through coordination with the County's eight transit operators, Citizens' Advisory Committee, and annual SRTP process with a goal toward promoting program productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness. • Provide innovative commuter rideshare programs to reduce single occupant vehicle trips and coordinate with other regional rideshare service providers to address intercounty commute trips. • Work with local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the CHP to continue efficient delivery of a comprehensive motorist aid system which includes an 1E511 traveler information service, a call box program, and a FSP program, including temporary services in freeway construction zones. • Leverage resources to incorporate park and ride facilities and additional connecting bus service at Metrolink stations that may have available capacity. • Continue working with Caltrans to monitor traffic conditions for the purpose of focusing transportation funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies. • Work with Caltrans and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of the highways and regional arterials. • Support the implementation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that provide non -motorized transportation alternatives. Foster Environmental Stewardship The Commission will achieve its mobility goals while promoting environmental stewardship and protecting the area's natural resources and quality of life. • Continue working with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), Caltrans, and state/federal resource agencies to implement the MSHCP. • Work with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), sub -regional agencies, and local jurisdictions to implement the current RTP and sustainable communities' strategy that meets regional air quality goals, conformity guidelines, and SB375 green house reduction targets for the SCAG region. • Support a variety of outreach channels and educational programs that promote the benefits of ridesharing, public and specialized transit, rail, and availability of commuter resources for the purposes of reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. • Facilitate private/public use of clean fuels technology. • Continue to develop sustainable and green commuter rail stations and provide upgrades and rehabilitation projects to reduce the environmental impact of the existing stations. Support Transportation Choices through Intermodalism and Accessibility County residents will be served, where economically feasible, through the development of transportation alternatives and travel options that consider the needs of a wide range of citizens. • Work with transit providers and local social service agencies to provide specialized transit service to meet a broad spectrum of socio-economic transit needs of seniors, persons with disabilities, and low income residents. • Leverage commuter and motorist assistance outreach channels in order to increase the awareness and use of alternative commuting modes. • Implement the Commission's commuter rail SRTP and Southern California Regional Rail Authority's (SCRRA or Metrolink) plan for commuter rail services with an emphasis on the Perris Valley Line, an extension from Riverside to Perris via Moreno Valley. • Advocate for the provision of Amtrak commuter and/or passenger rail services to the Pass Area and the Coachella Valley. • Continue to pursue the goals and objectives as outlined in the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) for Riverside County related to a unified, comprehensive but flexible strategy for transportation service delivery to address transportation gaps and/or barriers focusing on unmet transportation needs of elderly individuals, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited income. • Enhance security, surveillance, and emergency response capabilities of County transit facilities and roadway infrastructure through proactive planning, interagency coordination, and investment. Prioritize Public and Agency Communications The Commission will provide timely, informative, and accurate information to encourage informed public and agency participation in the Commission's decision -making processes. • Promote a close working relationship with news and civic entities to increase interest and understanding of transportation and related issues. • Enhance the provision of public information through various forms of communication (e.g., website, annual report, monthly newsletter, television, Speakers Bureau, print media, radio, etc.). • Maintain an ongoing effort of informing Riverside County's Congressional and State Legislative delegations regarding County transportation issues. • Develop an effective long-range legislative strategy regarding federal transportation bill funding and federal agency practices to ensure that the federal government participates as a full partner in funding Riverside County projects that are of national and regional significance. • Protect and enhance flexibility in the Commission's use of state and federal transportation revenue in addressing regional priorities and needs. • Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality -of -life needs for Riverside County. • Advocate for sufficient funding for Riverside County transit and transportation projects from various federal and state revenue sources including, but not limited to, annual federal appropriations, economic recovery programs, STIP, and Proposition 1B bond programs. • Seek legislative flexibility for innovative financing and delivery methods. • Maintain ongoing efforts to educate commuters, businesses, and the public regarding the Commission's toll planning efforts and specific project development efforts currently underway. Financial and Administration Policies Financial Planning Policies • Administrative costs, including salaries and benefits, shall be funded by allocations from Measure A, LTF, FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds. • The Commission shall budget no more than one percent (1%) of Measure A sales tax revenues for administrative salaries and benefits. • Administrative program delivery costs will be budgeted at whatever is reasonable and necessary, but not to exceed four percent (4%) of Measure A sales tax revenues (inclusive of the one -percent salary limitation). The Commission shall budget 100% of the annual required contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. • The Commission shall utilize unexpended 1989 Measure A funds only for projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A. Sales tax revenues from the 2009 Measure A shall be expended only for projects and programs included in the 2009 Measure A. • Amounts will be budgeted by fiscal year for multi -year projects, based on best available estimates, with the understanding that, to the extent actuals vary from those estimates and the project is ongoing, adjustments will be made on a continual basis. • The fiscal capital budget should be consistent with the strategic plan and deviations appropriately noted, explained, and justified. • A balanced budget shall be adopted annually with operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses equal to or less than identified revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances. Revenue Policies • Sales tax revenue projections will be revised semi-annually to ensure use of current and relevant data. Staff may adjust annual amounts during the budget preparation process to reflect the most current economic trends. • A strategic application of local funding sources will be used to maximize federal and state funding of projects. • Fiduciary responsibility regarding Western County TUMF revenues shall be exercised, and revenues will be allocated pursuant to Commission direction and the approved 2009 Measure A. • Adopted toll revenue policies will establish congestion pricing in order to maximize throughput on toll facilities. Such pricing will be adjusted quarterly by pre -defined formulas. Debt Management Policies • Outstanding sales tax revenue bonds shall not exceed $975 million. • Toll revenue supported debt may be issued for specific highway projects and may comprise toll revenue bonds and federal loans. • The Commission will maintain 2.0x debt ratio coverage on all senior sales tax revenue debt and 1.3x debt ratio coverage on all toll revenue debt. • Debt issuance will be for major capital projects including engineering, right of way, and construction. Operating requirements, if any, must be paid from current ongoing revenues and may not be financed except for initial toll operations. • Costs of issuance, including the standard underwriter's discount, will not exceed two percent (2%). • The Commission may enter into interest rate swaps to better manage assets and liabilities and take advantage of market conditions to lower overall costs and reduce interest rate risk. • While it is the intent of the Commission to establish a cash debt reserve for long term bond issuance, as necessary, surety bonds can be obtained when beneficial to the Commission. • All sales tax revenue debt must mature prior to the termination of 2009 Measure A on June 30, 2039. • All toll revenue supported debt must mature prior to the expiration of toll facility agreements. Expenditure Accountability Policies • Established priorities for planning and programming of capital projects will be reviewed annually with the Commission. • Actual expenditures will be compared to the budget on at least a quarterly basis, and significant deviations will be appropriately noted, explained, and justified. • Operations and maintenance agreements for toll operations will be implemented, and related costs will be compared to toll financing assumptions. Reserve Policies • The Commission will maintain program reserves in accordance with Measure A and TDA policies and guidelines. • The Commission will establish and maintain a transit operator's reserve of ten percent (10%) for the Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. Additionally, a ten percent (10%) reserve will be established and maintained for each of the Western County transit operators (public bus and commuter rail). • The Commission will establish and maintain reserves for toll operations, capital improvements, and debt service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements. Cash Management and Investment Policies • Where possible, the Commission will encourage receipt of funds by wire transfer to its accounts. • Balances in the bank operating account will be maintained at the amount necessary to meet monthly expenditures. • Construction and operating funds will be invested per the Commission's established investment policy emphasizing in order of priority: 1) safety, 2) liquidity, and 3) yield. • Cash disbursements to local jurisdictions and vendors/consultants will be completed in an expeditious and timely manner. Auditing, Accounting, and Financial Reporting Policies • The Commission will maintain its ERP system in order to integrate project and toll operations accounting needs and improve accounting efficiency. ■ The Commission will issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR); separate financial reports for the LTF, STA, Proposition 1B Rehabilitation and Security Project Accounts, and toll operations upon commencement of such operations; and State Controller's Transportation Planning Agency Financial Transactions Report as well as Government Compensation in California Report. • An audit is to be conducted annually on the Commission's accounting books and records. As long as the Commission has outstanding bonds and federal loans, an independent accounting firm must conduct the audit. • The Commission is responsible for ensuring that audits of Measure A and TDA funding recipients are completed and reviewed for compliance and other matters in a timely manner. Human Resources Management Policies ■ While accommodating the assumption of toll operation responsibilities, Commission staffing levels will be consistent with the intent of its enabling legislation, which envisioned a small, but effective staff. • Contract staff and consultants will be used to augment staff efforts as much as possible to support programs or workloads, which do not appear to be of a permanent nature. Information Technology Management Policy ■ Significant effort will be made to maintain efficient and cost-effective technology infrastructure by continuously upgrading network equipment and software to ensure quality performance, productivity, and connectivity among staff, other agencies, toll operator, and the public. Network security will continue to be a top priority to maintain the integrity of the Commission's network and information. Linking Commission Policy Goals and Departmental Goals and Objectives The following matrix (Table 19) illustrates the linkage of the Commission's overall policy goals described in this section to the individual departmental goals and objectives included in Section 6. Table 19 - Relationship Between Commission and Departmental Goals Goods System Environmental Economic iorermodalism & Financial & Department Mobility Movement Miele ncies Stewardship Development Foxe ssibility Communications Administration Management Services Executive Management X x X X X Administration X X Legislative Affairs & Communications X x x X X Finance X Regional Programs Planning and Programming X x X X X X X Rail Maintenance and Operations X X X X X Public and Specialized Transit X X X X X Commuter Assistance X X X X X X Motorist Assistance X X X X Capital Project Development & Delivery X X X x X X X ��..� Ignmani Riverside County Transportation Commission OPhimiJimq Budget Process Summary The budget is the primary performance tool used to measure and control accountability of public agencies for taxpayer dollars. The budget communicates to all stakeholders (i.e., elected officials, regional agencies, and citizens) how the investment they made will be put to use by providing detailed information on the specifics of resource allocation and expenditures. Progress is monitored on a monthly basis, and revisions and updates are made as deemed necessary to reflect changing dynamics and accommodate unplanned requests. This results in a budget document that is useful and meaningful as a benchmark against which to evaluate government accomplishments and/or challenges and to assess compliance with fiscal accountability. Unlike many governments that provide direct services to the general public, the Commission has the overall responsibility of managing transportation planning and funding for Riverside County. As a result its budget, in terms of dollars, is comprised primarily of capital -related programs and projects; the operating component of the budget is related to multimodal programs (commuter and motorist assistance services, rail operations, and transit planning). Management services, which consist of executive management, administration, legislative affairs and communications, and finance, provide support to both capital and operating programs and projects. Chart 7 depicts the organization of the Commission's oversight and management functions. The budget process consists of six primary tasks conducted in phases throughout the fiscal year. Chart 6 illustrates the budget process for the development of the FY 2013/14 budget and monitoring of the FY 2012/13 budget. A summary of each task is described below. Chart 6—Budget Process ID Task Name Duration 2012 2013 J FAIS 10 N D JI F IMIAIMIJ 1 Short Term Strategic Direction Phase 140 days 2 Resource Identification and Allocation Phase 200 days - .11.1111111111 3 Needs Assessment Phase 120 days 4 Development and Review Phase 150 days 5 Adoption and Implementation Phase ^Budget 45 days 6 Roles and Responsibilities 365 days Short -Term Strategic Direction Phase The first phase of the budget process is to determine the direction of the Commission in the short-term and to integrate this with the Commission's long-term goals and objectives, including the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan as discussed in Section 6.3. Annually a workshop is held for the Board to evaluate and determine where the Commission plans to be and what it desires to accomplish over the next five to ten years. Annual reviews allow for timely responsiveness to any significant political, legislative, or economic developments that may occur locally, statewide, or nationally. Staff then adjusts its course based on the long-term strategic direction of the policy makers. Staff convenes in early January to both assess actual results, compared to the current year budget, and map changes in strategy for the ensuing fiscal year by reviewing and, if necessary, redefining departmental mission statements and setting goals. Those goals, upon review by the Board, become the Commission's short-term strategic direction. Chart 7 — Functional Organization Chart FY 2013/14 Mohms octal Programs lel titer Assisi mire la= FsIs Pla nning Board of Commissioners PQLpr Committees W RC Programs &Prole % ERC Prog ram s& Nolen/5 •Budget & Insole m entat l[n Adrltarie COMM it lee} -iedrnitaI Adrispry •Citircns Advisory Adrnlnist reran rr Human Resources feowl ive trim mlitter Legal Counsel Lsenrtrve Management 1 tegi7latNB Alt air% & Cons m mica lmrs Uwe AdleXacy Rela� _ yT G nods Morrm err* Caprtal Protect Dead opm arts & Del kvot IRte iranapp ration iJl lmpravement Program Regional Tramp:re at Ion Plan R Conaestlon Management [pAF Program F ruin ce r— f knmrrda I eM Budget alumni ent [metier! Management & PrOturernent Disadvantaged &Meets EMe rprl sa Adnelreirteat ton Resource Identification and Allocation Phase Simultaneous with the short-term strategic direction phase, staff focuses on what funding sources are available and what monies are estimated as carryover from the current year. Additionally, the Commission's fund balances, that are the excess of fund assets over fund liabilities, are analyzed for available appropriation in the following fiscal year. In actuality, resource identification occurs throughout the year, but it is finalized in the upcoming fiscal year budget. Amounts to be borrowed are determined as parts of the long-term strategic planning process, but such amounts are adjusted in the annual budget to reflect more current information. Needs Assessment Phase Staff and consultants evaluate what projects and studies need to be accomplished. Project priority and sequencing set in the long-term strategic plan are the top candidates for budget submission. However, priorities may have changed due to economic necessities or political realities, resulting in projects being rescheduled by acceleration or postponement. New projects may be added or existing priorities deleted based on Commission direction. Development and Review Phase Using all the data and information gathered from the previously mentioned stages, department managers submit their desired budgets to the Finance Department. The information, along with staff and overhead allocations, is compiled into a preliminary or draft budget. After review by the Executive Director and inclusion of the desired changes, the draft budget is presented to the Board for input. Adoption and Implementation Phase The proposed budget is submitted to the Commission at its May meeting. A hearing is scheduled to allow for public comment on the proposed budget. The Commission may choose, after public hearing, to adopt the budget or to request additional information and/or changes to the budget. The budget must be adopted no later than June 15 of each year. Upon adoption by the Commission, the budget is entered into the ERP system effective July 1 for the next fiscal year. Budget Roles and Responsibilities Involvement in the budget permeates all staffing levels, as presented in Chart 8, at the Commission from clerical support staff to policy makers. Each program manager develops a detailed line item budget that consists of the operating and/or capital components. Those budgets, by program, are submitted to the department director for review and concurrence. The department managers submit their budgets to the Chief Financial Officer by mid -March. The Finance Department compiles the department budgets. Both the capital and operating budgets are combined into the draft budget for the entire Commission. The Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director review the entire budget for overall consistency with both the short- and long-term strategic direction of the Commission, appropriateness of funding sources for the identified projects and programs, and reasonableness of the operating and capital budget expenditures. Expenditure activities of the funds are controlled at the budgetary unit, which is the financial responsibility level (General, Measure A, Motorist Assistance, LTF, STA, TUMF, Capital Projects, and Debt Service Funds) for each function (i.e., administration, programs, intergovernmental distributions, debt service, capital outlay, and other financing uses). These functions provide the legal level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount). Budget -to -actual reports are available to program managers and directors on a real-time basis through the ERP system for informational and management purposes, including identification and evaluation of any significant budget variations. During the fiscal year management has the discretion to transfer budgeted amounts within the financial responsibility unit according to function or may provide support for supplemental budget appropriations requests. Supplemental budget requests require the authorization of the Commission. The Commission may take action at any monthly meeting to amend the budget. In some years, the Finance Department may compile miscellaneous requests and submit a budget appropriations adjustment at mid -year to the Commission for approval. Those budget amendments approved by the Commission are incorporated into the budget, as they occur, and are reflected in the CAFR in the final budget amounts reported in the budgetary schedules. Chart 8 — Staff Organization Chart FY 2013/14 Mum. Resaurcos Ark,' ingll.luf Offkri &NW: SMI.ie.r M.IWaf 54n1DrAdm..Ntt.Ir.e Asehwµ Ad Ini4htrHWa ASswla I IeI l Ptoonentenr Manage! Fiminp Mnatie eunncFer arncurrm.ri! An.rytl Armunli,r SupOYMer L AccnunrinN rrehn.i.n{rl A.xvunle,y A1lhrant lll Samar Office reset.rnt Gee& Maw. Wahl Mum", eP.rd niCadimliiI0eNer Fareudve pntrGf Go✓o mimed Re lotions Mr.fret r MW[Imeghollervrtel Ple.Amg [Prupanmdne prerlur Cirn rlo. 14111491001 stafoloatra trwouuuewr Scarf A nare,i Cammuin.6 MOtame Ayset.noe Manager 1. s,arrAn.ly,t w OW'. Proor.mmi i Mwnager Sen ler StafrAnaryoi SlHF AngeYr Communing &Amon' Mop a(.f Prolent Drveiopmeni Osmrtar csrluil noise MmagarNl Cpaal SYgeRy Caettaly R OW. Pe.n.err Neht of Way Mon mer senior slam Analyst - Ste Anar/ss Fdlfar AQminkveee iMil Ilium is.......,..___ Riverside County Transport*Non Commission tttl it m a � !ayd A g At Fund Budgets Budgetary Basis The Commission accounts for its budgeted governmental funds using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The basis of accounting is the same as the basis of budgeting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available to meet current year obligations. Revenues are considered to be available when they are guaranteed as to receipt, based on expenditure of funds (i.e., government matching funds), or certain to be received within 180 days of the end of the fiscal year. Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred; however, debt service expenditures are recorded when the payment is due. Total sources and uses by governmental fund type for the FY 2013/14 budget are shown in Chart 9. Chart 9 — Total Sources and Uses by Governmental Fund Type FY 2013/14 ■ Total Sources 8% ■ Total Uses 3% ■ Total Sources 47% ■ Total Uses 39% Fund Structure ■ Total Sources 1% ■ Total Uses 2% III General Fund ■Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds IN Debt Service Fund ■ Total Sources 44% ■ Total Uses 56% There are 29 funds (Chart 10) that account for the Commission's budgeted resources and are categorized into four governmental fund types: General fund, special revenue funds, capital projects funds, and debt service funds. All of the Commission's funds are budgeted. There are three funds reported in the General fund and 21 in the special revenue funds. Three capital projects funds are used to account for capital project expenditures financed with short- or long-term debt proceeds. In addition, the Commission has two debt service funds to account for debt - related activity. Chart 10 — Budgeted Funds Structure FY 2013/14 General Fund Adtnln htratlon Rail Operation Planning and Progn agning Special Revenue Funds 1B119 Measurf ■ W sYi • rn County Hyhway RIG aortal I� 2009 Measure A Western County Highways Local Streets & Roads Public Transit Specialized Transit Bus Transit Rail Transit Commuter Assistance New Ccrrirlcn goad ryncing &eltlonal Alt. rink &enernic(eye lupine nt LasAcheRs aeuey Higln.ays & Regionel Arterlel s foal Sinters& Roads SpedsMed Tranwi Pala garde U.IMy !Axel Mrtert & Roads SSP SATE l er el Tr a nseo rtallon Th nds Siete Transit Assistance TUMT J Capital Projects Funds i Debt Service Funds Sales Tam Bonds Toll Rey en ue Bonds General Fund Overview The General fund of the Commission is used to account for all activities not legally required or designated by Board action to be accounted for separately. For many public agencies, the General fund is the largest fund; however, it is less significant for the Commission. The Commission's largest revenue source is Measure A, a locally levied sales tax that legally must be accounted for separately in special revenue funds. In addition to Commission administration and general operations, other General fund activities include commuter rail maintenance and operations as well as planning and programming. The FY 2013/14 budget for the General fund is presented in Table 20, followed by a discussion of significant components of the budget. Table 20 - General Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax $ 2,700,000 Federal Reimbursements 9,300 State Reimbursements 176,000 Local Reimbursements 187,300 Other Revenue 47,900 Investment Income 55.200 TOTAL Revenues 3,175,700 2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 100,000 4% 470,000 10,000 25,000 (445,000) -95% 910,000 400,000 1,119,000 209,000 23% 225,200 277,700 224,800 (400) 0% - - N/A 67,900 27,000 20,200 (47,700) -70% 4,373,100 3,414,700 4,189,000 (184,100) -4% Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits 3,270,400 3,350,800 3,392,600 3,991,700 640,900 19% Professional and Support Professional Services 1,639,000 2,800,900 2,022,600 3,024,100 223,200 8% Support Costs 2.544.800 3,295.400 2,901,000 3.292.700 (2,700) 0% TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 4,183,800 6,096,300 4,923,600 6,316,800 220,500 4% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 1,398,800 1,394,800 1,300,500 1,471,700 76,900 6% Engineering 39,400 39,500 5,000 (34,400) -87% Operating and Capital Disbursements 18,981,200 13,411,200 9,956,900 14,400,000 988,800 7% Special Studies 169,500 760,000 250,000 914,000 154,000 20% TOTAL Projects and Operations 20,549,500 15,605,400 11,546,900 16,790,700 1,185,300 8% Debt Service Principal Payments 23,900 N/A Interest Payments 1,300 - - - N/A TOTAL Debt Service 25,200 - - - N/A Capital Outlay 67,500 205,700 116,900 439,200 233,500 114% TOTAL Expenditures 28,096,400 25,258,200 19,980,000 27,538,400 2,280,200 9% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (24,920,700) (20,885,100) (16,565,300) (23,349,400) (2,464,300) 12% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 25,633,600 20,470,300 19,424,100 14,896,600 (5,573,700) -27% Transfers Out (552,0001 N/A Net Financing Sources (Uses) 25,081,600 20,470,300 19,424,100 14,896,600 (5,573,700) •27% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 160,900 (414,800) 2,858,800 (8,452,800) (8,038,000) 1938% Beginning Fund Balance 13,524,300 2,685,200 13,685,700 16,544,000 2,858,800 21% ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 13,685,20C $ 13,270,400 $ 1E044,000 $ 8,091,200 5 (5,179,200) -39% The sources for the General fund (Chart 11) consist of allocations from Measure A sales tax revenues; various other federal, state and local reimbursements for planning activities and commuter rail station maintenance; investment income; transfers from LTF, TUMF, and motorist assistance for administration; transfers of LTF sales tax revenues for planning, programming, and monitoring (PPM) activities; transfers of LTF Article 4 allocations for commuter rail transit operations and capital; and other transfers for rail station maintenance of park and ride facilities. Chart 11— General Fund Sources FY 2013/14 MeasureASales Tax r 15% State Reimbursements 6% Local Reimbursements 1% Transfers In 7.5% Measure A sales tax revenues allocated for administration of $2,800,000 has increased 4% compared to the prior year to offset increased expenditures. The administrative allocation may be adjusted at mid -year based on required expenditures, but in no event will exceed four percent (4%) of total Measure A revenues (including administrative salaries and benefits). Federal reimbursements represent funding for interns. The 95% decrease is due to the delay in grant funding for the Riverside station pedestrian improvement project. State reimbursements include STIP funds for a commuter rail feasibility study in the Coachella Valley and to fund PPM activities. Local reimbursements are from other local agencies related to a portion of the security costs at the commuter rail stations. LTF sales tax revenues from the Local Transportation Fund, a special revenue fund, are allocated and transferred to the General fund for administration, planning and programming, and rail transit operations and capital for the following purposes: • Administration allocations from LTF sales tax revenues of $800,000 in FY 2013/14 have increased $100,000 compared to the prior year to offset increased expenditures. • Planning allocations are set by law at three percent (3%) of estimated LTF sales tax revenues. The FY 2012/13 revised budget of $2,451,400 includes the effect of the mid -year projection adjustment. This adjustment usually includes the unapportioned carryover amount, which is not determined until after the prior year's fiscal year end, and revised revenue projections. The FY 2013/14 budget for planning allocations is $2,175,000. • Transit funding for commuter rail, which is tied to sales tax revenues, is based on operating and capital needs to the extent that revenues and reserved fund balance are available. The FY 2013/14 budget includes $8,141,100 in LTF and $112,200 in Measure A commuter assistance allocations primarily to fund operating and capital contribution expenditures to SCRRA as well as rail station operations and maintenance. • Allocations aggregating $2,246,200 for local jurisdictions' grade separation projects were included in the FY 2012/13 General fund revised budget. The FY 2013/14 budget includes LTF allocations of $2,600,000 for grade separation projects. Administrative transfers in from TUMF and motorist assistance of $1,068,300 in FY 2013/14 increased from $936,400 in FY 2012/13. Chart 12 — General Fund Uses FY 2013/14 Capital Outlay 2% Personnel Salary and Benefits 14% AiiiiProfessional Services 11% ._ 14% Support Costs 12% General fund uses are depicted in Chart 12. Personnel salary and benefits expenditures increased 19% because of the addition of two FTEs for a human resources administrator and planning and programming director; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by the employee's contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs increased 8% due to increased professional services for investment advisory services and planning and programming grant administration. Support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Projects and operations expenditures increased 8% because of increased special studies for a new commuter rail feasibility study in the Coachella Valley. The FY 2013/14 budget includes no allocation for rail capital contributions and $2,600,000 for grade separation projects. Capital outlay expenditures increased 114% due to information technology upgrades to the Commission's data communication room and electronic document management system. Special Revenue Funds Overview The Commission's special revenue funds are legally restricted as to use for Measure A projects and programs, TUMF projects, motorist assistance services, and funding transit operations and capital in the County. The special revenue funds' budgets are summarized in Table 21, and individual budgets are presented in Tables 22 through 29 along with respective discussions. Table 21— Special Revenue Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 Actual Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE FY 12/13 Revised Budget $ 132,284,300 $ 66,556,700 13,487,500 25,102,000 21,235,300 1,821,300 8,116,400 1,382,200 1,967,000 271,952,700 138,300,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 69,699,900 17,007,800 2,463,500 7,557,300 882,800 2,071,000 321,694,800 2,802,200 3,620,300 9,993,200 1,183,300 11,176,500 9,795,400 21,366,500 27,451,200 16,285,700 53,728,100 52,677,000 67,000 40,127,900 8,962,700 230,461,500 142,200 244,582,400 11,875,800 2,037,900 13,913,700 17,485,700 27,573,500 125,994,100 29,050,000 104,222,700 84,424,600 40,000 42,129,000 16,455,400 447,375,000 242,000 465,151,000 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget $ 138,300,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 39,567,200 20,906,500 2,311,700 7,268,200 493,500 857,300 293,416,900 3,567,600 11,338,100 1,685,900 13,024,000 12,955,100 16,540,900 60,326,900 29,050,000 61,595,400 58,822,300 70,000 42,129,000 20,500,400 301,990,000 88,300 318,669,900 $ 144,200,000 72,500,000 13,298,000 91,620,000 132,377,300 2,729,600 6,723,400 500,000 1.030.400 464,978,700 3,957,700 21,615,000 2,300,600 23,915,600 18,635,400 20,355,000 240,968,400 217,750,000 164,707,800 108,210,800 25,000 43,825,900 25,157.500 839,635,800 357.000 867,866,100 Dollar Change $ 5,900,000 3,000,000 (914,500) 21,920,100 115,369,500 266,100 (833,900) (382,800) (1,040.600) 143,283,900 Percent Change 4% 4% -6% 31% 678% 11% -11% -43% -50% 45% 337,400 9% 9,739,200 262,700 10,001,900 1,149,700 (7,218,500) 114,974,300 188,700,000 60,485,100 23,786,200 (15,000) 1,696,900 8302.100 392,260,800 115.000 402,715,100 82% 13% 72% 7% -26% 91% 650% 58% 28% -38% 4% 53% 88% 48% 87% 27,370,300 (143,456,200) (25,253,000) (402,887,400) (259,431,200) 181% 44,150,600 (61,005,500) (16,854,900) 151,092,900 (74,323,800) 76,769,100 90,002,100 (43,906,500) 46,095,600 387,406,200 (66,075,200) 321,331,000 236,313,300 8,248,600 244,561,900 156% -11% 319% 10,515,400 (66,687,100) 20,842,600 (81,556,400) (14,869,300) 22'i; 463,492,600 474.008,000 474,008,000 494.850,600 20.842.600 4% $ 474,008,000 $ 407,320,900 $ 494,850,600 $ 413,294,200 $ 5,973,300 1% Measure A and LTF sales taxes, STA allocations, Western County TUMF, state budgetary allocations, and vehicle registration fees are all accounted for in the 21 special revenue funds. Federal, state, and local reimbursements and transfers in consisting principally of debt proceeds are used to supplement the Measure A sales tax revenues. Chart 13 illustrates the various special revenue fund sources. Chart 13 — Special Revenue Funds Sources FY 2013/14 Measure A Sales Tax 17% LTF Sales Tax 8% 144r._ STASaIes Tax 2% Federal Reimbursements 12% 'local Reimbursements 0% State Reimbursements 16% The special revenue funds' resources are expended on County highway, rail, regional arterial, and new corridors engineering, right of way acquisition, construction, and design build; local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction; economic development incentives; bond financing; bicycle and pedestrian facilities; education and incentive programs to encourage use of alternate modes of transportation; special social service transportation programs; public transit operations and capital needs; and motorist towing and freeway call box assistance. As shown in Chart 14, projects and operations expenditures represent the primary use of special revenue fund resources. Chart 14 — Special Revenue Funds Uses FY 2013/14 Personnel Salary and Benefits 7 Professional Services Transfers Out I 2% 7% . Support Costs i Projects and Operations 90% Measure A Special Revenue Funds Of the special revenue funds, 16 are funded primarily with Measure A sales tax revenue, which is allocated to the three geographic areas of the County (Chart 15). The Measure A funds are comprised of two 1989 Measure A and ten 2009 Measure A Western County operating funds, three 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley operating funds, and one 2009 Measure A Palo Verde Valley operating fund. Chart 15 — Measure A Sales Tax Revenues by Geographic Area Palo Verde Valley 1% Coachella Valley 24% Western County 75% Since the 1989 Measure A terminated on June 30, 2009, the remaining 1989 Measure A Western County operating funds will be closed upon the completion of the specific highway and rail projects. With the commencement of the 2009 Measure A on July 1, 2009, the 14 operating funds will be in existence for the 30-year term. These funds account for all Measure A project and program expenditures and transfers of debt service for capital projects. The Measure A special revenue funds expend monies on capital construction and improvements to highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, new corridors, and local streets and roads. Funding is also reserved for commuter assistance, public and specialized transit, and economic development incentives programs as well as bond financing costs. The Commission is a self-help county, and, as such on major highway projects, the Commission supplements the State's spending. Upon completion of most highway projects, Ca!trans takes over the maintenance and operations of the projects. All revenues from the Measure A sales tax have been pledged as security for the Commission's senior sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper notes. Debt service on the bonds is recorded in the Sales Tax Bonds debt service funds, and most of the resources for the cash payments are provided through transfers out by the Measure A special revenue funds for the 2009 Measure A bonds. Debt service for the commercial paper notes is recorded in a capital projects fund, as the notes will be paid from 2009 Measure A sales tax revenues or retired with proceeds from sales tax revenue bonds. Western County Measure A Operating Funds The Western County Measure A Operating special revenue funds account for Western County's approximately 75% share of the Measure A sales tax. As demonstrated in Table 22, most of the Commission's reimbursements flow through these funds, since the sales tax leverages state and federal dollars. Table 22 - Western County Measure A Operating Funds FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Sources Measure A Sales Tax Bond Financing Commuter Assistance Economic Development Incentives Highways Local Streets and Roads New Corridors Public Bus Transit Rail Regional Arterials Specialized Transit Total Measure A Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional Services Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads TOTAL Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Transfers Out TOTAL Uses $ 8,066,500 $ 8,433,000 1,493,800 1,562,000 1,195,000 1,249,000 30,473,300 31,859,000 28,979,500 30,297,000 11,054,000 11,557,000 2,158,500 1,593,000 6,094,700 6,372,000 8,962,800 9,370,000 1,904,600 2,655,000 100, 382, 700 104,947,000 24,972,400 69,699,900 17, 482,000 13, 457,800 1,317,400 1,933,900 1,826,600 1,257,300 1,274,500 882,800 1,040,700 1,392,800 39, 365,300 130,834,000 187,661,600 324,405,500 2,515,200 3,206,500 8,831,400 10,755,700 667,600 1,149,000 7,126,400 14,188,800 17,469,900 23,621,500 26,059,800 96,688,100 16,285,700 29,050,000 49,420,200 92,878,400 4,290,800 5,189,000 67,000 40,000 28,375,700 29,842,000 149,095,500 291,497,800 142,200 242,000 44,771,400 34,924,800 206,023,300 341,775,800 $ 8,433,000 1,562,000 1,249,000 31,859,000 30,297,000 11,557,000 1,593,000 6,372,000 9,370,000 2,655,000 104,947,000 39,567,200 17,320,100 1,824,100 968,200 493,500 445,800 82,084,600 247,650,500 3,163,700 10,072,500 803,800 9,792,100 12,355,000 51,080,800 29,050,000 57,126,600 4,345,200 70,000 29,842,000 193,661,700 88,300 18,258,200 226,048,200 FY 13/14 Budget $ 8,711,000 1,613,000 1,291,000 32,907,000 31,294,000 11,937,000 1,645,000 6,581,000 9,679,000 2.743.000 108,401,000 91,620,000 128,197,300 2,227,000 423,400 500,000 621,800 354,136,700 686,127,200 3,467,000 20,154,200 1,420,600 14,650,600 12,982,000 199,484,300 217,750,000 154,980,000 7,834,000 25,000 211 G2A CM 638,340,800 357,000 34,804,900 698,544,500 Dollar Change Percent Change $ 278,000 3% 51,000 3% 42,000 3% 1,048,000 3% 997,000 3% 380,000 3% 52,000 3% 209,000 3% 309,000 3% 88,000 3% 3,454,000 3% 21,920,100 31% 114,739,500 853% 293,100 15% (833,900) -66% (382,800) -43% (771,000) -55% 223,302,700 171% 361,721,700 112% 260,500 8% 9,398,500 87% 271,600 24% 461,800 3% (10,639,500) -45% 102,796,200 106% 188,700,000 650% 62,101,600 67% 2,645,000 51% (15,000) -38% 792,900 3% 346,843,000 119% 115,000 48% (119,900) 0% 356,768,700 104% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ (18,361,700) $ (17,370,300) $ 21,602,300 $ (12,417,300) $ 4,953,000 -29% The budgeted Western County Measure A sales tax revenues reflect a 3% increase compared to the prior year due to revised Measure A sales tax projections. Taxable sales changes between jurisdictions within the County also periodically affect the geographic allocation formula from year to year. Federal reimbursements for highway and rail projects and the commuter assistance program, which are higher in the FY 2013/14 budget and relate to funding from the FTA, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), Surface Transportation Program (STP), and earmarks. The 31% increase in federal reimbursements is primarily attributable to the commencement of construction on the Perris Valley Line project. State reimbursements are higher by 853% compared to the FY 2012/13 budget and reflect funding from STIP and Proposition 16 funding for various highway and rail projects, particularly the 1-215 and SR-91 corridor improvement projects and the Perris Valley Line. Local reimbursement increases are attributable to the commuter assistance program and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. TUMF revenue represents reimbursements from TUMF zone funds administered by WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange construction and right of way acquisition, and the decrease in these TUMF reimbursements reflects the near completion of the project. Other revenue is related to property management lease revenues, which reflects a decrease from the prior year and is related to properties acquired in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Investment income is lower compared to the previous year's budget due to lower ending projected cash balances resulting from the commencement of construction on the Perris Valley Line and the SR-91 corridor improvement project. As in prior years, a significant portion of transfers in consists of debt proceeds of $342,227,600 from sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, and commercial paper notes to fund 2009 Measure A Western County highway projects. Other significant transfers in include funding from STA and debt service reserve funds aggregating $11,250,000 for rail capital projects and $659,100 for regional arterials in accordance with the 2009 Measure A related to a city not eligible to receive the local street and roads funds. Personnel salary and benefits expenditures increased 8% because of the addition of two FTE allocations for a facilities administrator and capital projects manager; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by the employee's contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Measure A Western County professional services expenditures in FY 2013/14 consist of general legal services for the various programs and capital projects, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the SR-91 and 1-15 corridor improvement projects, other professional services for rail capital and commuter assistance projects, and professional fees related to the Commission's debt programs. The increase of 87% in FY 2013/14 compared to the previous year reflects investment advisory services and legal services related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project financing and rail service easement activities in preparation for the commencement of commuter rail service on the Perris Valley Line. Support costs comprise operations for the commuter assistance program and property management services. General program operations comprise the program management with outside consultants for the highway and rail capital and commuter assistance programs, permits required for capital projects, and subsidies and certificates for the commuter assistance program. Such levels of operations typically fluctuate as project activities transition to another phase. Many of the Commission's Western County rail and highway projects funded by Measure A have been in the project development phase for several years and are now near or in the construction phase. Accordingly, engineering expenditures are expected to decrease 45%, while construction and design -build activities are anticipated to increase 106% and 650%, respectively. Projects still in the engineering and/or final design phase but at a decreased level of costs include the SR-91 and I- 215 corridor (southbound connector) improvements, the SR-91 HOV lanes, and 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connectors. The 74/215 interchange and 1-215 corridor improvements central segments, which commenced construction in June 2010 and March 2011, respectively, will continue through FY 2013/14. Several Western County TUMF regional arterial projects will be under construction in FY 2013/14. After many years of project development, the Perris Valley Line project is anticipated to begin construction in FY 2013/14, subject to obtaining final FTA approvals. In addition to the design and construction, other design -build activities related to the SR-91 corridor improvements during FY 2013/14 include utility and railroad agreements and the agency, legal, financial, and engineering consultant staff to support these activities. Right of way acquisition is another major project activity for which the process can be lengthy. Significant right of way acquisitions will benefit the SR-91 corridor improvement, SR-91 HOV lanes, 91/71 interchange improvement, Mid County Parkway, and various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects. Operating and capital disbursements are higher by 51% compared to the FY 2012/13 budget and relate to Western County intercity bus service and specialized transit expenditures funded by Measure A. Local streets and roads comprise turn back payments to local jurisdictions and increased as a result of the higher Measure A sales tax revenues. Capital outlay includes equipment and improvements for the rail and commuter assistance programs. Significant transfers out include funding for debt service payments of $16,000,000; reimbursements of $1,000,000 from the 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund; rail operating needs of $112,200 from 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund; 1989 Measure A Western County regional arterial fund contribution of $17,000,000 for various TUMF projects; 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads fund allocation of $659,100 to 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterials fund; and $33,600 for CHP FSP on the I-215 corridor improvements central segment project. Coachella Valley Measure A Operating Funds These special revenue funds account for Coachella Valley's 24% share of the Measure A sales tax. Table 23 — Coachella Valley Measure A Operating Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Measure A Sales Tax Highways & Regional Arterials $ 15,499,500 $ 16,205,000 $ 16,205,000 $ 17,391,000 $ 1,186,000 7% Local Streets and Roads 10,849,700 11,343,000 11,343,000 12,173,000 830,000 7% Specialized Transit 4,649,900 4,861,000 4,861,000 5,217,000 356,000 7% Total Measure A 30,999,100 32,409,000 32,409,000 34,781,000 2,372,000 7% Federal Reimbursements 9,800 - N/A Investment Income 63,100 12,600 41,900 14,100 1,500 12% Transfers In 284,100 - N/A TOTAL Sources 31,356,100 32,421,600 32,450,900 34,795,100 2,373,500 7% Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits 1,300 2,700 2,000 7,500 4,800 178% Professional Services 2,000 3,500 1,600 3,500 0% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 6,800 5,000 7,000 200 3% Construction 99,000 N/A Operating and Capital Disbursements 4,256,800 4,500,000 4,500,000 5,500,000 1,000,000 22% Local Streets and Roads 10,849,700 11,343,000 11,343,000 12,173,000 830,000 7% Regional Arterials 8,962,700 16,455,400 20,400.400 25.000.000 8.544.600 52% TOTAL Projects and Operations 24,168,200 32,305,200 36,248,400 42.680.000 10,374,800 32% TOTAL Uses 24,171,500 32,311,400 36,252,000 42,691,000 10,379,600 32% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 7,184,600 $ 110,200 $ (3,801,100) $ (7,895,900) $ (8,006,100) -7265% As shown in Table 23, overall budgeted Coachella Valley Measure A sales tax revenues increased 7% due to revised Measure A sales tax revenue projections. Taxable sales changes among the geographic areas also impact the geographic allocation formula from year to year. Personnel salary and benefits expenditures are minimal based on FTE allocations for coordination of debt financing activities of certain Coachella Valley projects. The Coachella Valley operating and capital disbursements represent specialized transit funds distributed to SunLine for transit operations. Local streets and roads comprise turn back payments to local jurisdictions and are directly affected by changes in Measure A sales tax revenues. Regional arterial projects are highway and regional arterial projects managed by CVAG. Debt service for CVAG highway and regional arterial and the City of Indio local streets and roads projects under advance funding agreements are reflected in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the financial system. Palo Verde Valley Measure A Operating Fund This special revenue fund accounts for Palo Verde Valley's 1% share of the Measure A sales tax. Table 24 — Palo Verde Valley Measure A Operating Fund FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Sources Measure A Sales Tax Local Streets and Roads TOTAL Sources Uses Projects and Operations Local Streets and Roads TOTAL Uses $ 902,500 $ 944,000 $ 944,000 902,500 944,000 944,000 902,500 944,000 944,000 902,500 944,000 944,000 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ FY 13/14 Budget $ 1,018,000 1,018,000 1,018,000 1,018,000 Dollar Percent Change Change $ 74,000 8% 74,000 74,i,G'0 74,000 $ N/A The Measure A sales tax revenues are affected by the impact of shifts in taxable sales changes on the geographic allocation formula as well as updated revenue projections. In the Palo Verde Valley as noted in Table 24, expenditures are for local streets and roads. Debt service for the City of Blythe local streets and roads projects under an advance funding agreement are reflected in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the financial system. Non -Measure A Special Revenue Funds The non -Measure A special revenue funds account for LTF disbursements; TUMF Western County project costs; motorist assistance expenditures for towing service, freeway call boxes, and 1E511 system operations; and transit disbursements from STA. These activities are budgeted in the LTF, TUMF, FSP and SAFE, and STA special revenue funds, respectively. Local Transportation Fund The LTF special revenue fund derives its revenue from one quarter of one cent of the state sales tax that is returned to source and provides for funding of public transit operations in the County, bicycle and pedestrian facility projects, planning, and administration (Table 25). Table 25 — Local Transportation Fund FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 Actual Sources LTF Sales Tax Local Reimbursements Investment Income TOTAL Sources Uses Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements TOTAL Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL Uses Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 66,556,700 $ 40,800 317,800 66,915,300 69,500,000 $ 69,500,000 $ 72,500,000 $ 3,000,000 4% N/A 347,800 81,000 214,500 (133,300) -38% 69,847,800 69,581,000 72,714,500 2,866,700 4% 42,126,100 60,630,600 47,027,100 69,274,800 8,644,200 14% 42,126,100 60,630,600 47,027,100 69,274,800 8,644,200 14% 14,910,500 19,382,600 18,336.400 13,716.100 (5,666,500) -29% 57,036,600 80,013,200 65,363,500 82,990,900 2,972,700 4% $ 9,878,700 $ (10,165,400) $ 4,217,500 $ (10,276,400) $ (111,000) 1% The LTF sales tax revenue in FY 2013/14 is projected to increase 4% from the prior year. Investment income is expected to decrease due to lower ending projected cash balances in FY 2013/14. In FY 2013/14, approximately 80% and 20% of the LTF transit expenditures of $67,439,000 are for operating and capital purposes, respectively. LTF operating allocations consist of 80% to Western County, 19% to Coachella Valley, and 1% to Palo Verde Valley public bus operators. The actual allocations will not be approved until July 2013. Other operating and capital disbursements include allocations for SB821 bicycle and pedestrian projects of $1,280,000 and planning and administration allocations of $555,800 to the County Auditor -Controller and SCAG. Transfers out include allocations to the Commission's General fund for planning and administration of $2,975,000, rail operations and station maintenance of $8,141,100, and grade separation projects of $2,600,000. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund The TUMF fund accounts for the Commission's share of developer fee assessments on new residential and commercial developments in Western County for regional arterials and CETAP corridors (Table 26). TUMF revenue is projected to remain unchanged due to the recovering housing market. The transfers in for FY 2013/14 relate to funding from the 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterials fund of $17,000,000 for the cities of Corona, Moreno Valley, and San Jacinto and the County projects and TUMF CETAP of $15,319,500 for the city of Temecula's regional arterial projects along 1-15. Table 26 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Sources Federal Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional Services Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Right of Way/Land Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL Uses $ 119,800 6,289,800 326,500 3,701,200 10,437,300 136,400 370,300 300 277,000 3,896,600 1,292,400 4,307,900 $ - $ 6,300,000 78,600 1%221,900 6,300,000 156,000 6,880,500 25,600,500 13, 336,500 235,200 226,000 399,100 527,500 4,300 1,900 280,100 223,000 3,952,000 4,185,900 29,246,000 9,246,100 11,344,300 4,468,800 100,000 9,773,900 44,822,400 18,223,800 227,000 18,445,100 5,990,600 10,507,900 63,906,100 24,969,800 FY 13/14 Budget 6,300,000 60,300 32,319 500 38,679,800 296,000 690,800 4,100 342,800 7,373,000 41,484,100 9,727,800 157,500 59,085,200 16,013,300 76,089,400 Dollar Change Percent Change $ N/A 0% (18,300) -23% 13,097,600 68% 13,079,300 51% 60,800 26% 291,700 73% (200) -5% 62,700 22% 3,421,000 87% 12,238,100 42% (1,616,500) -14% 157,500 N/A 14,262,800 32% (2,431,800) -13% 12,183,300 19% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ (70,600) $ (38,305,600) $ (11,633,300) a 17/A1)7.0W/ $ 896,000 -2% Personnel salary and benefits have increased 26% due to the allocation of FTEs; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by employee's contributions for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services have increased 73% due to legal services related to property acquisitions. Projects and operations costs increased 32%, as many regional arterial projects move into various stages of engineering, right of way acquisition and construction phases. Approximately 85% of the projects and operations costs are attributable to programmed regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment project. The remaining 15% relates to CETAP projects such as the Mid County Parkway preliminary engineering and right of way acquisitions. Transfers out represent administrative allocations of $693,800 to the General fund and CETAP funding of $15,319,500 for two city of Temecula regional arterial projects along 1-15, which are within the CETAP Winchester to Temecula corridor limits. Freeway Service Patrol Fund The FSP fund accounts for the state and local resources provided to cover the costs of servicing stranded motorists in covered service areas and construction zones by means of towing, changing tires, and providing fuel (Table 27). The State's funding share of $2,680,000 has increased 28% from the FY 2012/13 budget due to increased FSP support of construction projects. Transfers in represent Commission match funds of $916,400 from the SAFE special revenue fund and reimbursements of $33,600 from the 2009 Measure A Western County highway funds for construction FSP service related to the I-215 (central segment) corridor improvements. Table 27 - Freeway Service Patrol Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources State Reimbursements $ 1,988,300 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,136,400 $ 2,680,000 $ 580,000 28% Local Reimbursements 14,400 85,600 600 600 (85,000) -99% Other Revenue 900 - N/A Investment Income 1,600 1,900 500 1,300 (600) -32% Transfers In 800,000 1,037,000 1,037,000 950,000 (87,000) -8% TOTAL Sources 2,805,200 3,224,500 3,174,500 3,631,900 407,400 13% Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits 69,000 50,400 73,900 61,400 11,000 22% Professional Services 33,800 37,000 56,000 51,000 14,000 38% Support Costs 41,200 59,900 57,200 53,200 (6,700) -11% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 2,314,100 2,900,000 2,830,000 3,530,000 630,000 22% TOTAL Projects and Operations 2,314,100 2,900,000 2,830,000 3,530,000 630,000 22% Transfers Out 116,100 174,800 174,800 214,400 39,600 23% TOTAL Uses 2,574,200 3,222,100 3,191,900 3,910.000 687,900 .21% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses 5 231,000 $ 2,400 $ (17,400) $ (278,100) $ (280,500)-11688% Personnel salary and benefits have increased 22% due to the allocation of FTEs; market equity adjustments resulting from the biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by employee's contributions for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services have increased 38% from the previous year due to a FSP benefit analysis planned in FY 2013/14. Support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Operating costs for towing services in FY 2013/14 are higher than FY 2012/13 budget due to increased FSP support on construction projects. Transfers out are administrative allocations to the General fund. Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund The SAFE fund accounts for the $1 per vehicle registration fee levied by the State on all registered vehicles within the County. It funds the installation and implementation of emergency aid call boxes located strategically on the highways throughout the County as well as the operations of the IE511 system (Table 28). Table 28 -Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources State Reimbursements $ 1,765,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 50,000 3% Local Reimbursements 448,700 444,000 487,000 502,000 58,000 13% Other Revenue 106,800 N/A Investment Income 25,600 21,100 13,000 11,700 (9,400) -45% TOTAL Sources 2,346,100 1,915,100 1,950,000 2,013,700 98,600 c Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits 80,300 125,500 102,000 125,800 300 0% Professional Services 755,700 680,500 680,500 715,500 35,000 5% Support Costs 474,200 824,700 823,000 822,700 (2,000) 0% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 77,900 110,000 105,000 105,000 (5,000) -5% Construction 60,000 (60,000) -100% TOTAL Projects and Operations 77,900 170,000 105,000 105,000 (65,000) -38% Transfers Out 980,500 1,146,500 1,146,500 1,076.500 (70,000) -6% TOTAL Uses 2,368,600 2,947,200 2,857,000 2.845.500 (101,700) 3"5 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ (22,500) $ (1,032,100) $ (907,000) $ (831.800) S 200,300 -19% Local reimbursements represent the pass -through funds from SANBAG as its share of the 1E511 system operating costs and the recoveries from call box knockdowns, which service is provided by a collection agency. Personnel and support costs are comparable to the FY 2012/13 budget. Professional services costs have increased slightly due to the 1E511 website updates. Support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Projects and operations costs decreased as a result of the exclusion of the 1E511 Caltrans detection expansion project at the 60/91/215 interchange in FY 2013/14. The transfers out reflect a matching contribution to the State's contribution for towing services of $916,400 to the FSP special revenue fund and administrative allocations to the General fund of $160,100. State Transit Assistance Fund The STA fund accounts for the state budgetary allocation of gas tax revenues designated for rail and bus transit operations and capital requirements (Table 29). The allocation is based on estimates of diesel fuel sales tax revenues provided by the Controller of the State of California, subject to an annual state budget appropriation. Table 29 — State Transit Assistance Fund FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Sources STA Sales Tax Investment Income TOTAL Sources FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Projected Budget Change $ 13,487,500 $ 14,212,500 $ 14,212,500 $ 191,700 216,200 119,100 13,679, 200 14,428, 700 14,331,600 Uses Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements 2.003,300 TOTAL Projects and Operations 2,003,300 Transfers Out 13,298,000 $ (914,500) 106,700 (109,500) 13,404,700 (1,024,000) Percent Change -6% -51% -7% 14,105,000 2,950,000 25,602,000 11,497,000 82% 14,105,000 2,950,000 25,602,000 11,497,000 82% 250.000 250,000 - 0% TOTAL Uses 2,003,300 14.355.000 2.950.000 25,852,000 11,497,000 80% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 11,675,900 $ 73,700 $ 11,381,600 $ (12,447,300) $ (12,521,000)-16989% Investment income is expected to decrease because of lower cash balances due to increased capital disbursements to operators. The operating and capital disbursements consist of allocations for bus capital purposes. In FY 2013/14, 68% of the allocations are in Western County, 31% in Coachella Valley, and 1% in Palo Verde Valley. Transfers out represent rail capital allocations to the 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund. Similar to the LTF allocations, the actual STA allocations will not be approved until July 2013. Capital Projects Funds Overview The capital projects funds account for all debt proceeds from commercial paper notes and sales tax and toll revenue bonds (Table 30). Table 30 - Capital Projects Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Investment Income $ 2,130,500 $ 5,103,600 $ 24,000 $ 1.877,700 S (3,225,900) -63% TOTAL Revenues 2,130,500 5,103,600 24,000 1,877,700 (3,225,900) -63% Expenditures Professional and Support Professional Services 1,248,100 1,248,100 N/A TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 1,248,100 1,248,100 N/A Projects and Operations Engineering 319,100 (319,100) -100% Construction 1,301,100 N/A Right of Way/Land 8,024,100 3,121.000 (8.024,100) -100% TOTAL Projects and Operations 8,343,200 4,422,100 (8,343,200) -100% Debt Service Principal Payments 40,000,000 120,000,000 80,000,000 (40,000,000) -33% Interest Payments 3,800 433,000 10,600 100,000 (333,000) -77% Cost of Issuance - - 7.500.000 7,500.000 N/A TOTAL Debt Service 40,003,800 120,433,000 10,600 87,600,000 (32,833,000) •27% TOTAL Expenditures 40.003.800 128.776.200 4.432.700 88.848.100 (39.928,100) -31% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (37,873,300) (123,672,600) (4,408,700) (86,970,400) 36,702,200 -30% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 19,177,300 136,889,600 109,900 80,000,000 (56,889,600) -42% Transfers Out (42,962,100) (253,144,800) (81,629,600) (560,250,600) (307,105,800) 121% Debt Proceeds 40,000,000 1,220,172,000 80,000,000 700,774,000 (519,398,000) -43% TIFIA Loan Proceeds - 110,000.000 110,000,000 N/A Net Financing Sources (Uses) 16,215,200 1.103.916,800 (1,519.700) 330,533A00 (773.393,400) -70% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) (21,658,100) 980,244,200 (5,928,400) 243,553,000 (736,691,200) -75% Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE 58,453,600 36,795,500 36,795,500 30,867,100 (5.928,400) -16% $ 36,795,500 $ 1,017,039,700 $ 30,867,100 $ 274,420,100 $ (742,619,600) -73% As illustrated in the following charts, capital projects funds sources primarily consist of debt proceeds (Chart 16), and the significant uses of the capital projects funds are transfers out (Chart 17). In 2005, a commercial paper program was established to advance project development and land and right of way acquisition related to the 2009 Measure A projects. In FY 2012/13, the Commission expects to issue $80,000,000 in commercial paper notes prior to the SR-91 corridor improvement project financing, which is expected at the beginning of FY 2013/14. The commercial paper program anticipates the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds to refinance the outstanding commercial paper notes in FY 2013/14. During FY 2013/14, the Commission expects the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes. In connection with the financing of the SR-91 corridor improvement project in early FY 2013/14, the Commission anticipates the issuance of $404,646,000 in sales tax revenue bonds (2013 Sales Tax Bonds), including $61,089,000 in bond premiums and $207,512,000 in toll revenue bonds, including $7,527,000 in bond premiums, as well as execution of a federal TIFIA loan, from which $110,000,000 is expected to be drawn down in FY 2013/14. Chart 16 — Capital Projects Funds Sources FY 2013/14 Investment Income 0% Transfers In I 9% Debt Proceeds jw 91% Debt proceeds represent the issuance of $20 million in commercial paper notes for the 1-15 and 1-215 corridor improvement projects as well as the proceeds of the sales tax and toll revenue bonds and the federal TIFIA loan drawdown for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Chart 17 — Capital Projects Funds Uses FY 2013/14 Professional Services Debt Service 14% Transfers Out 86% In FY 2013/14, commercial paper and sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds of $342,227,600 will be transferred out to the 2009 Measure A Western County Highway special revenue funds for capital projects, particularly the I- 15, 1-215, and SR-91 corridor improvement projects; $80,000,000 of 2013 sales tax revenue bond proceeds will be transferred out to retire outstanding commercial paper notes; $90,362,000 of 2013 sales tax revenue bond proceeds will be transferred out to the Debt Service fund to pay debt service payments during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project; and $47,661,000 of 2013 toll revenue bond proceeds will be transferred out to the debt service funds to fund a debt service reserve for and to pay debt service payments during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Debt Service Funds Overview Under the 2009 Measure A program, as amended by Measure K in November 2010, the Commission has the authority to issue sales tax revenue bonds subject to a debt limitation of $975,000,000. The debt service fund of the Commission is used to account for all activities related to the sales tax revenue bonds debt incurred by the Commission (Table 31). The Commission's largest single expenditure is debt service. The debt agreements require the trustees to hold all debt proceeds, a portion of the sales tax revenues, and upon commencement of toll operations in FY 2016/17, the toll revenues from the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, and to segregate all funds into separate amounts. These monies are included in the restricted investments held by trustee in the capital projects funds and the debt service funds. Under the sales tax indentures, the Commission may use sales tax revenues for any lawful purpose related to the Riverside County TIP after the trustee has satisfied debt service requirements. Under the toll indentures, which include the TIFIA loan, the use of toll revenues is prescribed by a flow of funds to be administered by the trustee. In order to advance project development activities, the Commission established a commercial paper program in 2005. Periodically a portion of the commercial paper notes issued has been retired with sales tax revenue bonds including those bonds issued in 2009 (2009 Bonds) and 2010 (2010 Bonds). Table 31— Debt Service Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Federal Reimbursements $ 2,985,700 $ 2,982,000 $ 1,372,000 $ 2,744,000 $ (238,000) -8% Investment Income 155,600 23,400 3,078.000 1,098,200 1,074,800 4593% TOTAL Revenues 3,141,300 3,005,400 4,450,000 3,842,200 836,800 28% Expenditures Professional Services 788,300 788.300 N/A Debt Service Principal Payments 6,500,000 6,800,000 6,800,000 7,100,000 300,000 4% Interest Payments 15,003,600 16,180,000 16,180,000 41,012.300 24,832,300 153% TOTAL Debt Service 21.503,600 22.980.000 22.980,000 48,112,300 25,132,300 109% TOTAL Expenditures 21,503,600 22,980,000 22,980,000 48,900,600 25,920,600 113% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (18,362,300) (19,974,600) (18,530,000) (45,058,400) (25,083,800) 126% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 35,015,700 19,665,800 16,000,000 154,023,000 134,357,200 683% Transfers Out (19.457.6001 (650,000) (10,00(1,000) (9,350,000) 1438% Net Financing Sources (Uses) 15,558,100 19,015,800 16,000,000 144,023,000 125,007,200 657% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) (2,804,200) (958,800) (2,530,000) 98,964,600 99,923,400-10422% Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE 53,894,100 51,089,900 51,089,900 48,559,900 (2,530,000) -5% $ 51,089,900 $ 50,131,100 $ 48,559,900 $ 147,524,500 $ 97,393,400 194% Reimbursements consist of federal cash subsidy payments related to the 2010 Series B designated as build America bonds (BABs). The BABs subsidy payments reflect a reduction due to federal sequestration cuts. Investment income is significantly higher than the previous fiscal year due to higher cash reserve balances resulting from the issuance of sales tax and toll revenue bonds in FY 2013/14. Transfers in represent the primary sources of funding for the debt service funds (Chart 18) and consist of sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds from the capital projects funds and Measure A funds from the 2009 Measure A Western County Highways and Bond Financing special revenue funds. Chart 18 — Debt Service Funds Sources FY 2013/14 Federal Reimbursements 2% Transfers In 98% Investment Income 0% Debt Service fund uses (Chart 19) consist of debt service on the sales tax and toll revenue bonds as well as transfers out of $10,000,000 from excess 1989 Measure A debt reserves to the 1989 Measure A Western County Rail Capital special revenue fund for a San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL) rail project. Chart 19 — Debt Service Funds Uses FY 2013/14 Professional Services 1% Transfers Out 17% Debt Service 82% MUM 21k2rEa Riverside County Transportation Commission Afq n 1 -n L Revenues and Other Sources Total revenues and other sources are budgeted at $1,921,987,400, and consist of Measure A sales tax of $147,000,000, (or 8% of total sources); LTF sales tax of $72,500,000 (or 4% of total sources); STA revenues of $13,298,000 (or less than 1% of total sources); federal revenues of $94,389,000 (or 5% of total sources); state revenues, including vehicle registration fees, of $133,496,300 (or 7% of total sources); TUMF of $6,723,400 (or less than 1% of total sources); debt proceeds of $810,774,000 (or 42% of total sources); transfers in of $636,325,800 (or 33% of total sources) and other revenues of $7,480,900 (or less than 1% of total sources). The specific revenue funding sources are shown in Table 32. Table 32 — Revenues and Other Sources FY 2013/14 Sales Tax Department/Program MeasureA it STA Federal State Local/Other Funding Sources Management Services $ 2,800,000 $ 5 $ $ - $ 22,800 MEASURE A AND OTHER CAPITAL PROGRAMS Bond Financing 8,711,000 11,600 CETAP 3,192,500 Economic Development 1,291,000 9,300 Highways 50,298,000 18,537,600 79,283,000 4,212,900 Local Streets and Roads 44,485,000 New Corridors 11,937,000 135,400 Rail 6,581,000 75,100,000 48,914,300 506,100 Regional Arterials 9,679,000 3,227,200 REGIONAL PROGRAMS Public and Specialized Transit 9,605,000 12.500,000 13,298,000 43,400 344,100 Planning and Programming 819,000 3,700 Rail Station Maintenance/Operations 25,000 300,000 218,500 Commuter Assistance 1,613,000 683,000 - 1,804,600 Motorist Assistance 4,180,000 515,600 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Debt Proceeds Transfers In 810,774,000 636,325,800 $ 2,822,800 8,722,600 3,192,500 1,300,300 152,331,500 44,485,000 12,072,400 131,101,400 12,906,200 95,790,500 822,700 543,500 4,100,600 4,695,600 810,774,000 636,325,800 TOTAL Funding Sources $ 147,000,000 $ 72,500,000 $ 13,298,000 $ 94,389,000 $ 133,496,300 $ 1,461,304,100 $ 1,921,987,400 Revenues —Definitions and Background Measure A: Measure A is a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax that was first approved by Riverside County voters in 1988 and expired on June 30, 2009 after a 20-year term. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A through 2039. The 2009 Measure A is expected to raise more than $6.8 billion (in nominal dollars) during its lifespan. The amount raised by the Measure A levy has increased as the County and its economic base have grown during the past two decades, peaking in FY 2005/06 at $157 million. As a result of an economic slowdown, Measure A revenues decreased the subsequent four years but have since stabilized. Measure A revenues are projected to approximate $141,000,000 and $147,000,000 in FY 2012/13 and FY 2013/14, respectively. Measure A requires that all sales taxes collected may only be used for transportation purposes including administration and the construction, capital acquisition, maintenance, and operation of streets, roads, highways, including state highways and public transit systems and for related purposes. These purposes include expenditures for planning, environmental reviews, engineering and design costs, and related right of way acquisition. The Commission historically has obtained and updated Measure A revenue projections through a consultant for budget and strategic project planning purposes. The most recent economic forecast was completed in December 2012, and the Commission's sales tax services consultant provides Measure A revenue projections in connection with its quarterly sales tax analysis. Measure A revenue projections, based on such updates and other factors, for the next five fiscal years are presented in Chart 20 below. Chart 20 — Forecasted Measure A Sales Tax Revenues 2014 — 2018 $170,000,000 $165,000,000 $160,000,000 $155,000,000 $150,000,000 $145,000,000 $140,000,000 $135,000,000 2014 2015 7016 2017 2018 The following additional assumptions were used in the development of the Commission's revenue forecast for FY 2013/14: • The Inland Empire economy will continue its recovery through FY 2013/14. • The State does not change mix of items subject to the sales tax from what has been included historically. • The relative sales and property tax rates of Riverside and surrounding counties do not change from historical levels. • Internet sales will have minimal impact on revenue. The Measure A sales tax revenue projections are considered in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan financing strategy. Geographic Allocation - Riverside County is comprised of three geographic areas: Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. The percentage of Measure A revenues allocated to each of these areas based on return to source is approximately 75% for Western County, 24% for Coachella Valley, and 1% for Palo Verde Valley (Chart 21). These percentages will experience some variations from year to year based on changes in levels of taxable sales among the geographic areas. Chart 21— Geographic Allocation of Measure A Revenues Palo Verde Vailey 1% Coachella 24 Valley �Ifestern County 75% Program Allocation - The 2009 Measure A TIP defines the manner in which the sales tax revenues are to be spent, as presented in the Table 33. In Western County, public transit includes funding for specialized transit, commuter rail, intercity bus service, and commuter assistance. For the Coachella Valley, public transit includes specialized transit and public bus services. Table 33 - Program Allocation of 2009 Measure A Revenues Western County ■Band Financing - 8% ■Economic Development Incentives 1% ■HigklwYays . 3096 ■Local Street.- and Roasts - 29% ■Ne►vCorridors - 11% •Public Transit - 12% • Regional Arterials -9% Coachella Valley •Highways and Regional Arterials - 50% •Local Streets and Roads - 359E •Public Transit - 15% Pala Verde Valley •Local5treets and Roads - 100% Local streets and roads allocations to the local jurisdictions within each geographic area are based on population (in Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling units (in Coachella Valley) and taxable sales. Based on the projected Measure A sales tax revenues of $147,000,000 for FY 2013/14, the geographic and program allocations are presented in Table 34. Table 34 - Geographic Allocation of Measure A Revenues by Program FY 2013/14 Program Administration Western County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Administration $ 2,800,000 $ - $ $ $ 2,800,000 Bond Financing 8,711,000 8,711,000 Economic Development Incentives 1,291,000 1,291,000 Highways 32,907,000 32,907,000 Highways and Regional Arterials 17,391,000 17,391,000 Local Streets and Roads 31,294,000 12,173,000 1,018,000 44,485,000 New Corridors 11,937,000 - 11,937,000 Public Transit 12,582,000 5,217,000 17,799,000 Regional Arterials 9,679,000 - 9,679,000 TOTAL $ 2,800,000 $ 108,401,000 $ 34,781,000 $ 1,018,000 $ 147,000,000 Local Transportation Fund: LTF, established in state law by the TDA, is funded through a one -quarter of one cent of the State's 8.00% sales tax. The intent of the legislation was to provide a dependable revenue stream for public transportation operations. Based upon an annual projection of LTF sales taxes that considers economic forecast revenue projections prepared by a consultant, local economic factors, and monthly receipt trends, the vast majority of LTF revenue in the County is allocated to the eight public transit operators, including the Commission for its share of Metrolink operations costs. Much like Measure A revenue, LTF had increased with the growth of the County and its economy until the recent economic recession and has stabilized in recent years. Revenues received from LTF are allocated for regional and local transportation planning, program administration, SB821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities projects, public bus transit, and rail transit, including the Commission for its share related to commuter rail operations in Western County. The Commission administers these funds on behalf of the County in a special revenue fund. State Transit Assistance: STA provides additional TDA state funding of transit operations and capital for urban counties, including the County's eight public transit operators. Due to the State's budgetary issues, it suspended the STA allocations for FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/11; however, allocations were made and funded at the end of FY 2009/10. Sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels have historically generated the STA funding; however, recent legislation eliminated the tax on gasoline. State Transportation Improvement Program: Administered by Caltrans, the STIP is funded through state and federal gas tax dollars and is California's primary transportation fund. Dollars are allocated to each county based on a formula that takes into consideration population and highway centerline miles. Actual programming decisions for 75% of STIP dollars are made by local transportation agencies such as the Commission. STIP reimbursement estimates are based on budgeted expenditures for specific projects with STIP allocations approved by the CTC. Proposition 1B: In November 2006, the voters in California approved Proposition 1B, which funds various transportation programs from bonds issued by the State. Programs that are funded include Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), transit capital, STIP supplement, and Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF). CMIA and transit capital revenues for certain highway and rail projects nominated by the Commission and approved by the CTC are included in state reimbursement revenues. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Registration Fees: State law allows county SAFE agencies to impose a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations within the County to pay for call box purchases and operations; excess SAFE revenues may be used for 511 operations and as a match for FSP operations. The call boxes enable motorists to summon help should they encounter mechanical or emergency problems while on the road, whereas the 1E511 system provides real-time traffic and transit trip information available via the internet or telephone. Caltrans Freeway Service Patrol Allocations: Caltrans is the primary sponsor of the FSP and provides the majority of funding for the program, including towing services in construction zones. The State provides nearly 80% of the funding for the FSP program based on population, freeway miles, and level of congestion throughout the State. The Commission administers and implements the program along with the CHP and Caltrans. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality: The CMAQ program is federally funded and is targeted for transportation improvements in areas with air quality problems. This program pays for improvements that reduce congestion while improving air quality. The Commission has also used CMAQ dollars to include commuter assistance programs, signal interconnects, HOV lanes, and transit projects. CMAQ reimbursement estimates are based on budgeted expenditures for specific projects with CMAQ allocations. Federal Transit Administration: FTA funding is generally allocated annually by the federal government to urbanized areas and is based on calculated miles of service. On a reimbursement basis, the federal government provides funding for qualified capital investments in rail facilities, track, and vehicles. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee: In connection with the 2009 Measure A, the TUMF program was established in the Western County to provide additional funding for regional arterial projects. TUMF is administered by WRCOG. As a result of a MOU with WRCOG, the Commission will receive 48.7% of the TUMF revenues, which are divided equally between the regional arterial and CETAP programs. TUMF revenues maintained by WRCOG are allocated for regional arterial zone improvements and regional transit facilities. TUMF revenue estimates are based on monthly receipt trends and consideration of local housing and commercial construction activity in the County. Rail and Highway Licenses: The Commission owns parcels of land and right of way for highway, rail, and regional arterial projects in selected areas throughout the County. The ownership provides licensing and leasing opportunities for fiber-optic cable, advertising signs, and business tenants. The amount of funding received from the licenses and leases provides revenue to partially support the cost of owning and maintaining the Commission's land and facilities. Investment Income: The Commission has established a prudent investment policy for cash on hand that is intended to maximize return while providing absolute safeguards on principal and liquidity, as noted in Section 1. Interest earnings on the State and County investment pools are estimated at an interest rate of .25%. The earnings on funds held by the trustee for debt service and projects are assumed to be at .75%. Program Revenues and Other Sources Revenues and other financing sources for FY 2013/14 are allocated to the various Commission programs as follows: Management Services The primary funding sources for management services are Measure A allocations of $2,800,000 as well as LTF allocation transfers in of $800,000 and administration funding transfers in of $1,068,300 from TUMF, SAFE, and FSP. Other revenues include $12,000 for small business forum activities. Interest revenues in FY 2013/14 are $10,800. Bond Financing Measure A Western County revenues of $8,711,000 will be used to support bond financing costs. Interest revenues are $11,600. CETAP The Western County CETAP program will receive $3,150,000 from TUMF for development of new CETAP corridors. Additionally, other local revenues include $42,500 representing investment income. Economic Development In order to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate in the Western County area, Measure A Western County revenues of $1,291,000 will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve and construct interchanges, provide public transit linkages or stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system. Interest earnings are $9,300. Highways Funding for the highway program includes 2009 Measure A sales tax revenues of $50,298,000 for Western County highways and Coachella Valley highways and regional arterials programs. The 2009 Measure A Western County sales tax revenues will be used primarily for the SR-91, I-15, and 1-215 corridor improvements. Unexpended 1989 Measure A Western County revenues from prior years will be used on remaining projects such as SR-74 widening from 1-15 to 7ch Street and curve realignment, SR-91 HOV lanes, 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors as well as for pass -through funding to the city of Riverside for interchange improvements for SR-91 at La Sierra Avenue. Federal funds for highway projects include $400,000 in demonstration funds for the 74/215 interchange, $3,412,000 in CMAQ funds for the SR-91 HOV lanes, $3,266,000 in CMAQ funds for the SR-74 curve widening, $1,864,000 in STP funds for the I-215/Blaine Street project, $4,400 in STP funds for the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors, and $6,847,200 in demonstration funds for the 91/71 interchange improvements. Other federal funds include $2,744,000 for BABs subsidy payments related to the 2010 Bonds. State funds include STIP funding totaling $23,595,000 will be used for the 1-215 corridor improvements. The 1-215 corridor improvements on the central segment will receive $18,688,000 in Proposition 1B CMIA funds, and the SR- 91 corridor improvement project will receive $37,000,000 in Proposition 1B State Local Partnership Program (SLPP) funds. Additional local funding includes $423,400 in TUMF zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange, $450,000 in lease revenues, $60,000 in carpool violations, $34,000 in local property management revenues, and interest revenue of $3,245,500. In FY 2013/14, the Commission anticipates the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes to fund the 1-15 and 1-215 corridor improvement projects and $404,646,000, including bond premium of $61,089,000, in sales tax revenue bonds; $207,512,000, including bond premium of $7,527,000, in toll revenue bonds; and $110,000,000 in a federal TIFIA loan drawdown to fund the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Transfers in include $342,227,600 in sales tax and toll revenue bond and commercial paper proceeds to fund the 2009 Measure A projects; $16,000,000 to the Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund for Measure A Western County and Coachella Valley highways debt service; $80,000,000 of sales tax revenue bond proceeds to retire commercial paper notes; $90,362,000 of sales tax revenue bond proceeds to fund capitalized interest payments in the debt service fund; and $47,661,000 of toll revenue bond proceeds to fund a debt service reserve and capitalized interest payments in the Toll Revenue Bonds debt service fund. Local Streets and Roads Measure A allocations of $44,485,000 for the local streets and roads program are distributed to the cities and the County for local street repairs, maintenance, and construction. New Corridors To leverage local, state, and federal funding for four new transportation corridors identified through CETAP, Measure A Western County revenues of $11,937,000 will be available for environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, and construction of these new corridors. Interest revenues of $135,400 are included in local revenues. Rail Unexpended 1989 Measure A Western County revenues will be used primarily for the Perris Valley Line and other rail capital projects. The 2009 Measure A Western County's public transit program allocated $6,581,000 for rail. Federal FTA funding for the Perris Valley Line project consists of $51,200,000 from Small Starts and $23,900,000 from CMAQ. State Proposition 1B transit allocations of $4,574,300 will fund the Perris Transit Center, station security, and station rehabilitation projects. STIP revenues of $43,240,000 will fund the Perris Valley Line. State Transportation Enhancements (TE) revenues of $1,100,000 will fund the Riverside station pedestrian improvement project. Local revenues include investment income of $94,100, reimbursements of $353,000 related to the Perris Transit Center, and property management revenues of $59,000. Transfers in of $250,000 and $10,000,000 from STA and excess reserves, respectively, are for a rail project. Regional Arterials The Western County regional arterial program will receive funds from Measure A and TUMF in the amounts of $9,679,000 and $3,150,000, respectively. The new TUMF revenues along with unexpended TUMF revenues from prior years will be the primary source of funding TUMF regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment. Other local revenues also consist of investment income of $77,200. Transfers in consist of $32,319,500 from 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterials and TUMF CETAP as a match for TUMF regional arterial projects and $659,100 from 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads, in accordance with the 2009 Measure A, related to a city not eligible to receive those funds. Public and Specialized Transit LTF sales tax revenues of $72,500,000 are allocated primarily for public bus and rail transit operations and capital in the County. A small portion of these revenues is used for LTF planning and administration allocations as well as SB821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities grants. STA allocations of $13,298,000 are allocated to the County's public transit operators. For the FY 2013/14 budget, unexpended LTF and STA revenues from prior years will also be used to fund transit operations as well as bicycle and pedestrian facilities grants. Under the 2009 Measure A, public transit funding of $9,605,000 has been allocated for Western County specialized transit and intercity bus services and Coachella Valley specialized and public transit services. Federal revenues consist of $43,400 in FTA Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Section 5316 funding. Local revenues represent investment income of $344,100. Planning and Programming Transportation planning studies are funded with a LTF off -the -top allocation transfer in of $2,175,000, or three percent of estimated LTF revenues. A LTF allocation transfer in of $2,600,000 will fund grade separation projects for the cities of Corona, Riverside and Jurupa Valley and the County. STIP in the amount of $819,000 will fund PPM activities of the Commission and CVAG. Local revenues consist of investment income of $3,700. Rail Station Maintenance and Operations Rail operations, which include Metrolink operating and capital contributions, station maintenance, and support, will be funded with LTF allocation transfers in of $8,253,300. A federal grant of $25,000 will fund interns. Proposition 1B will fund $300,000 for a commuter rail feasibility study in the Coachella Valley. In addition to interest revenues of $5,700, local revenues include $200,000 in reimbursements primarily from SCRRA for security costs, $5,000 for Metrolink violator citations, and $7,800 for miscellaneous vending machine revenues. Commuter Assistance The Commuter Assistance program will receive funding of $1,613,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County public transit to assist in implementing services to commuters and employers in promoting use of alternate modes of transportation in Western County. The Commission will also receive CMAQ funds of $648,000 to support the commuter assistance program and JARC revenues of $35,000 for a ridesharing project in the Coachella Valley. Local revenues consist of other agency reimbursements of $1,771,000 for support of the San Bernardino commuter assistance program and regional ridematching as well as investment income of $33,600. The 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund will transfer $1,000,000 to the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund for reimbursement of the park and ride facility at the Perris Transit Center. Motorist Assistance SAFE is funded from $1,500,000 in revenues received through DMV registration fees, while Caltrans will allocate $1,700,000 in State highway account funds to cover regular FSP services and $980,000 for special FSP services required for construction projects. The Commission will also receive local revenues of $492,000 to support SANBAG's share of the 1E511 system operations. Local revenues represent investment income of $13,000 and cost recoveries of $10,600 from responsible parties related to call box knockdowns. The State's FSP contribution is matched with an operating transfer in from SAFE of $916,400; the 2009 Measure A Western County highway program will transfer in $33,600 for construction FSP services related to the 1-215 corridor (central segment) improvements project. 4 Riverside County Transportation Commission tIl'A g 4 tk,hInliOGI fl� o� Commission Debt The Commission's current debt under the 2009 Measure A has been incurred for highway, regional arterial, economic development, and local streets and roads projects for which title usually vests or, upon completion, will vest with Ca!trans or local jurisdictions for ongoing operations and maintenance. Future Measure A sales taxes are pledged to cover Measure A debt service payments on the sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper notes. In FY 2013/14 the Commission will issue additional sales tax bonds as well as issue toll revenue bonds (2013 Toll Bonds) and obtain a federal TIFIA loan to be repaid from toll revenues generated on the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, which is part of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. The Commission will also issue commercial paper notes for the I-15 and 1-215 corridor improvement projects. Since the financed projects are not assets of the Commission for which the Commission will have operating responsibilities, except for the intangible rights to operate the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, future operating costs related to these projects cannot be determined and are not applicable. However, for toll and rail assets, operating budget impacts are considered in future project development. Table 35 presents a summary of the anticipated changes in the Commission's debt during FY 2013/14. Table 35 — Changes in Commission Debt Projected Balance July 1, 2013 Additions Accretion (Reductions) Projected Balance June 30, 2014 Commercial Paper 2009 Sales Tax Bonds 2010 Sales Tax Bonds 2013 Sales Tax Bonds 2013 Toll Bonds TIFIA Loan $ 80,000,000 $ 161,400,000 150,000,000 20,000,000 $ (80,000,000) (7,100,000) 404, 646,000 207,512,000 110,000,000 1,053,000 $ 391,400,000 $ 742,158,000 $ (86,047,000) $ 20,000,000 154,300,000 150,000,000 404,646,000 208,565,000 110,000,000 $ 1,047,511,000 The 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and 2013 Toll Bonds are expected to be issued at a premium of $61,089,000 and $7,527,000, respectively. Commercial Paper In March 2005 the Commission established a commercial paper program to advance project development and land and right of way acquisition under the 2009 Measure A TIP. In October 2010 the Commission reduced the commercial paper program to $120,000,000. Maturities of commercial paper notes are rolled over to new issuances of commercial paper. Regarding the commercial paper notes, the Commission currently maintains a P-1 and an A-1+ rating from Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) and Standard and Poor's Rating Service (S&P), respectively. Interest payments are made from available commercial paper proceeds or sales tax revenues. The Commission projects the issuance of $80,000,000 in commercial paper notes in FY 2012/13; those notes will be retired in July 2013 with the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. The Commission anticipates the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes during FY 2013/14 for capital project funding for a projected outstanding amount of $20,000,000 at June 30, 2014. The Commission will pay $100,000 in estimated commercial paper interest payments during the year. Commercial paper debt service expenditures are reflected in the Commercial Paper capital projects fund. The Commission has irrevocable direct draw letters of credit and reimbursement agreements with The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch (Bank of Tokyo), and Union Bank, N.A. (Union Bank) as credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper notes. The letters of credit in the amount of $60,750,000 for each series of notes expire in October 2014; however, the Commission anticipates reducing the commercial paper program to $60,000,000 following the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and terminating one of the letters of credit and reimbursement agreements. The costs for the liquidity support are reflected in the 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing special revenue fund. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds As a means to achieve a greater level of interest rate stability, the Commission entered into two interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $185,000,000 at a fixed rate for 20 years effective October 2009; the counterparties pay the Commission a floating rate equal to 67% of the one -month London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR. The counterparty for the first swap ($100,000,000 notional amount) at a fixed rate of 3.679% is Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America), and the counterparty for the second swap ($85,000,000 notional amount) at a fixed of 3.206% is Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank). As of June 30, 2014, the projected notional amounts for the Bank of America and Deutsche Bank swaps are $83,400,000 and $70,900,000, respectively. In connection with the commencement of the interest rate swaps in October 2009, the Commission issued $185,000,000 in variable rate sales tax revenue bonds to retire outstanding commercial paper notes, refund bonds issued in 2008, fund a portion of the debt service reserve, and pay costs of issuance. The 2009 Bonds are secured by standby bond purchase agreements (SBPAs) with JP Morgan Chase Bank (JPMorgan), which expire in September 2014. In connection with the extension of the original SBPAs with JPMorgan in September 2011, the Commission obtained the release of the debt service reserve for capital project funding purposes. The costs for these liquidity facilities are accounted for in the 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing special revenue fund. For FY 2013/14, the Commission has budgeted debt service principal and interest payments of $7,100,000 and $6,381,800, respectively. In November 2010 the Commission issued $37,630,000 in fixed rate tax-exempt bonds (Series A Tax -Exempt) and $112,370,000 in fixed rate taxable bonds (Series B Taxable) designated as BABs under American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The aggregate amount issued of $150,000,000 for the 2010 Bonds was used to retire approximately $103,300,000 of outstanding commercial paper notes, provide funds for 2009 Measure A Western County capital projects, and pay costs of issuance. A portion of the BABs were designated as recovery zone economic development bonds (RZEDBs). The Commission expects to receive a cash subsidy from the United States Treasury equal to 35% of the interest payable on the BABs or 45% of the interest payable on the Series B Taxable bonds additionally designated as RZEDBs; however, in FY 2012/13, the BABs subsidy was reduced approximately 8% due to federal sequestration cuts. If sequestration continues, the FY 2013/14 BABs subsidy is expected to also be reduced by approximately 5%. Estimated net debt service payments for the 2010 Bonds in FY 2013/14 are $0 for principal and $9,530,500 for interest payments, which are offset by the $2,744,000 cash subsidy payment. In connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement financing to be completed in July 2013, the Commission anticipates the issuance of $404,646,000 in additional sales tax revenue bonds at a premium of $61,089,000. The proceeds of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds will be used to pay a portion of the costs of the SR-91 corridor improvement project, retire approximately $80,000,000 in outstanding commercial paper notes, pay capitalized interest through January 2018, and pay costs of issuance. These 2013 Bonds have maturity dates through June 30, 2039. Estimated debt service payments for the 2013 Bonds in FY 2013/14 are $0 for principal and $18,800,000 for interest payments. The Commission has received long-term debt ratings of Aa2, AA+, and AA from Moody's, S&P, and Fitch Ratings (Fitch), respectively on its currently outstanding sales tax revenue bonds. These ratings are expected to be reaffirmed with the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. Toll Revenue Bonds and TIFIA Loan Toll revenue bonds of $207,512,000 will consist of current interest bonds (CIBs) and capital appreciation bonds (CABS) and include a premium of $7,527,000. The CIBs, which are expected to comprise approximately 65% of the toll revenue bonds issued, are projected to have maturity dates through June 2043, while the CABS will have projected maturity dates through June 2041 at the accreted value. In July 2010 the Commission authorized the issuance of up to $900,000,000 in toll revenue bonds in anticipation of the financing requirements for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Estimated debt service payments for the 2013 Toll Bonds in FY 2013/14 are $0 for principal and $6,300,000 for interest payments. In April 2012 the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) announced that the Commission received an invitation to the 2012 TIFIA program, which provided the final puzzle piece needed for the full funding of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. During FY 2012/13, the Commission submitted a TIFIA loan application and obtained approval for a maximum loan of $451,000,000. Based on current project cost estimates and finance model assumptions, the Commission anticipates a TIFIA loan in the amount of $416,255,000. The TIFIA loan provides low cost subordinate financing secured by toll revenues to be generated by the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. Considered "patient financing", interest repayment will be deferred for up to five years from substantial completion of the project and principal repayment will be sculpted around the revenue stream supporting the senior debt toll revenue bonds. The maximum repayment term of the TIFIA loan is 35 years from substantial completion, which would approximate January 2052 for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. The Commission anticipates the receipt of investment grade ratings for the 2013 Toll Bonds from S&P and Fitch and for the TIFIA loan from Fitch. Debt Capacity Analysis The Commission is legally prohibited from issuing additional sales tax revenue debt if its debt coverage ratio is less than 1.5 to 1 on all senior sales tax revenue debt. The Commission has adopted a higher standard of 2 to 1 as part of its debt management policy. As Chart 22 and Table 36 indicate, the Commission has successfully met its policy standard for sales tax revenue debt issued under the 2009 Measure A, even in a declining sales tax revenue environment. The 1989 Measure A related debt consistently exceeded the Commission's standard, and coverage for the 2009 Measure A related debt of 4.0 is anticipated for FY 2013/14. Any coverage less than 2 to 1 would necessitate using other program funding to cover all debt service expenditures. Chart 22 — Measure A Debt Capacity Analysis $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $- FY 2012/13 Table 36 — Measure A Debt Capacity Analysis Sales Tax Revenues Senior Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Senior Debt Long -Term Debt Rating Commercial Paper Rating FY 2013/14 FY 12/13 al Senior Debt Service ■ Available Revenues FY 13/14 $ $ 141,000,000 19,997,600 7.1 Aa2/AA+/AA P-1/A-1+ $ 147,000,000 $ 39,068,300 4.0 Aa2/AA+/AA P-1/A-1+ In connection with the toll -supported debt consisting of the 2013 Toll Bonds as senior debt and federal TIFIA loan as subordinate debt, debt service coverages of 1.5 to 1 and 1.3 to 1 will be required on the senior debt and subordinate debt, respectively. Aggregate Debt Service Schedule for Sales Tax Bonds Debt service requirements for the sales tax revenue bonds are based on amortization schedules for the 2009 Bonds; 2010 Bonds, including the BABs cash subsidy payments; and the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. Since commercial paper is expected to be refinanced with sales tax revenue bonds, debt service requirements for commercial paper are not included in Table 37; however, the debt service interest expenditures in FY 2013/14 for the commercial paper notes are estimated at $100,000. Table 37 — Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039 Total Principal $ 7,100,000 7,400,000 7,800,000 8,100,000 29,973,000 107,588,000 135,996,000 162,479,000 203,150,000 46,460,000 Interest Subsidy Payments 34,712,326 $ (2,744,000) $ 35,865,526 (2,982,113) 35,588,926 (2,982,113) 35,268,526 (2,982,113) 34,950,226 (2,982,113) 158,482,230 (14,910,563) 131,686,430 (14,910,563) 97,375,052 (14,897,936) 49,103,516 (9,470,800) 2,647,899 (550,754) Net Debt Service 39,068,326 40,283,413 40,406,813 40,386,413 61,941,113 251,159,666 252,771,866 244,956,116 242,782,716 48,557,144 $ 716,046,000 $ 615,680,656 $ (69,413,068) $ 1,262,313,588 Outstanding Debt and Debt Service Requirements as of June 30, 2014 Under the provisions of the 2009 Measure A, the Commission has the authority to issue bonds subject to a bond debt limitation of $975,000,000, reflecting an increase from the original authorization of $500,000,000 as a result of the voter approval of Measure K in November 2010. The following is a summary of debt issued and secured by 2009 Measure A revenues, receipt of which began in FY 2009/10: 2005 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A and Series B: In February 2005, the Commission authorized a $200,000,000 commercial paper program. In March 2005, the Commission established the program for $185,000,000 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A and B. In October 2010, the program was reduced to $120,000,000. The repayment of principal and interest on the commercial paper notes is secured by irrevocable direct draw letters of credit issued by Bank of Tokyo and Union Bank, and the Measure A sales tax revenues secure such repayment. Maturities of the commercial paper notes may range from one to 270 days, and interest rates are variable and dependent on current market conditions. The note agreements require the trustee to hold all note proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indenture. 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds {Limited Tax Bonds), Series A, B, and c, In October 2009, the Commission issued $185,000,000 principal amount of serial bonds to refinance the 2008 bonds, retire a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the commercial paper notes and a portion of accrued interest on the notes, and fund a reserve fund. In September 2011, the reserve fund was released to fund project costs in connection with the extension of the SBPAs by JPMorgan. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $6,500,000 to $13,700,000 on various dates through June 1, 2029 with variable interest rates set on a weekly basis. The 2009 Bonds are integrated with the interest rate swaps, thereby creating synthetic fixed rate debt. The 2009 Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2009 Bonds are summarized in Table 38. Table 38 — 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029 Total Principal $ 7,100,000 7,400,000 7,800,000 8,100,000 8,500,000 48, 500,000 60,300,000 13,700,000 Interest $ 6,381,800 6,103,000 5,826,400 5,506,000 5,187,700 20,633,600 10,212,800 579,000 Total Debt Service $ 13,481,800 13,503,000 13,626,400 13,606,000 13,687,700 69,133,600 70,512,800 14,279,000 $ 161,400,000 $ 60,430,300 $ 221,830,300 2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bands (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax -Exempt and Series B Taxable: In November 2010, the Commission issued $150,000,000 principal amount of serial bonds to retire all of the outstanding principal amount of the commercial paper notes and fund project costs. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $12,105,000 to $17,980,000 on various dates from June 1, 2030 through June 1, 2039. Interest rates for the Series A Tax -Exempt and Series B Taxable bonds are 5% and 6.807%, respectively. The Commission expects to receive cash subsidies from the U.S. Treasury related to the Series B Taxable bonds. The 2010 Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements, net of subsidy payments for the 2010 Bonds are summarized in Table 39. Table 39 — 2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal 2014 $ $ 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 - 2029-2033 52,170,000 2034-2038 79,850,000 2039 17,980,000 Interest 9,530,526 9,530,526 9,530,526 9,530,526 9,530,526 47,652,630 47,652,630 43,889,052 22,887,516 1,223,899 Subsidy $ (2,744,000) (2,982,113) (2,982,113) (2,982,113) (2,982,113) (14,910,563) (14,910,563) (14,897,936) (9,470,800) (550,754) Net Debt Service 6,786,526 6,548,413 6,548,413 6,548,413 6,548,413 32,742,066 32,742,066 81,161,116 93,266,716 18,653,144 Total $ 150,000,000 $ 210,958,356 (69,413,068) 291,545,288 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax -Exempt: In July 2013, the Commission expects to issue $404,646,000 principal amount of serial bonds at a premium of $61,089,000 to retire all of the outstanding principal amount of commercial paper notes, fund a portion of the SR-91 corridor improvement project costs, pay capitalized interest during construction, and pay cost of issuance. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $10,512,000 to $28,479,000 on various dates through June 1, 2039. Interest rate estimated is 5%. The 2013 Sales Tax Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds are summarized in Table 40. Table 40 — 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039 Total Principal Interest $ 18,800,000 - 20,232,000 20,232,000 20,232,000 21,473,000 20,232,000 59,088,000 90,196,000 75,696,000 73,821,000 96,609,000 52,907,000 123,300,000 26,216,000 28,480,000 1,424,000 Total Debt Service 18,800,000 20,232,000 20,232,000 20,232,000 41,705,000 149, 284,000 149,517,000 149,516,000 149,516,000 29,904,000 $ 404,646,000 $ 344,292,000 $ 748,938,000 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Current Interest Obligation): In July 2013, the Commission expects to issue $134,883,000 principal amount of serial CIBs to fund a portion of the 5R-91 corridor improvement project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an Operations and Maintenance Fund, and pay costs of issuance. The CIBs mature in installments ranging from $2,307,000 to $39,836,000 on various dates from June 1, 2022 through June 1, 2043. Interest rates range from 3.00%to 5.00%. The Toll Revenue Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and segregate funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the Toll Revenue bonds are summarized in Table 41. Table 41— 2013 Toll Revenue Current Interest Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039-2043 Total Principal 8,840,000 48,701,000 2,307,000 75,035,000 Interest Total Debt Service $ 6,300,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 33,541,000 27,479,000 19,336,000 19,336,000 16,999,000 $ 6,300,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 42,381,000 76,180,000 19,336,000 21,643,000 92,034,000 $ 134,883,000 $ 149,967,000 $ 284,850,000 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Capital Appreciation Obligation): In July 2013, the Commission expects to issue $72,629,000 principal amount of serial CABS to fund a portion of the SR-91 corridor improvement project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an Operations and Maintenance Fund, and pay costs of issuance. The CASs will not pay current interest as interest will be compounded commencing December 2013 semiannually and paid at maturity. Therefore, the CABS will increase in value, or accrete, by the accumulation of such compounded interest from its initial principal amount to the maturity value in installments ranging from $7,071,000 to $32,508,000 on various dates from June 1, 2029 through June 1, 2047. Interest rates range from 1.45% to 5.92%. The Toll Revenue Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and segregate funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the Toll Revenue bonds are summarized in Table 42. Table 42 — 2013 Toll Revenue Capital Appreciation Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Accreted Interest Total Debt Service 2029-2033 25,730,000 42,054,000 67,784,000 2034-2038 28,321,000 76,330,000 104,651,000 2039-2041 18,578,000 70,808,000 89,386,000 Total $ 72,629,000 $ 189,192,000 $ 261,821,000 TIFIA Loan Agreement: In July 2013, the Commission anticipates the execution of a $416,255,000 TIFIA loan for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. In FY 2013/14, the Commission is expected to draw $110,000,000 principal amount of TIFIA loan proceeds for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. During construction and for a period of up to five years following substantial completion, interest is compounded and added to the initial TIFIA loan. The TIFIA loan requires mandatory debt service payments at a minimum and scheduled debt service payments to the extent additional funds are available. TIFIA debt service payments are expected to commence in June 2022, which is five years after substantial completion of the SR-91 corridor improvement project, through June 30, 2051. The interest rate of the TIFIA loan is estimated at 3.50%. Based on a projected draw schedule, the following is an estimate of mandatory and scheduled debt service. Table 43 —TIFIA Debt Service Requirements F Mandatory Scheduled iscal Year Principal Interest Total Interest Total 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039-2043 2044-2048 2049-2051 Total Accretion Initial Loan $ - $ 147,000 196,000 196,000 275,172,000 234,868,000 510,579,000 (94,324,000) $ 416,255,000 $ 3,584,000 19,420,000 73,982,000 89,311,000 89, 278,000 71,845,000 16,859,000 364,279,000 $ 3,584,000 19,420,000 74,129,000 89, 507,000 89,474,000 347,017,000 251,727,000 $ 874,858,000 $ 32,157,000 69,956,000 15,335,000 $ 117,448,000 $ 35,741,000 89,376,000 89,464,000 89,507,000 89,474,000 347,017,000 251,727,000 $ 992,306,000 The allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds to the 2009 Measure A programs is presented in Chart 23. Chart 23 — Program Long -Term Debt Local Streets and Roads 0% Highways and Regional Arterials 1489E The allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds by the benefiting geographic area is presented in Chart 24. Chart 24 — Long -Term Debt by Geographic Area Palo Verde Coachella Valley �� //"Valiey a35 2% Western County 98% Outstanding Debt and Legal Debt Margin at June 30, 2014 A summary of the Commission's outstanding debt secured by Measure A sales tax revenues and related legal debt margin projected at June 30, 2014 is presented in Table 44: Table 44 — Legal Debt Margin 2009 Measure A Authorized Sales Tax Revenue Debt $ 975,000,000 2005 Commercial Paper Notes 20,000,000 2009 Bonds 154,300,000 2010 Bonds 150,000,000 2013 Bonds 404,646,000 Total Outstanding Debt 728,946,000 Legal Debt Margin $ 246,054,000 lin ilinna 0......_ Riverside County Transportation Conanission (11)tAiA[d di alo 4h Table 45 — Budget Comparison by Department FY 2012 — 2014 FY W12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Total Revenues Expenditures Management Services: Executive Management Administration Legislative Affairs and Communications Finance Total Management Services Regional Programs: Planning and Programming Services Rail Maintenance and Operations Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assistance Total Regional Programs Capital Project Development and Delivery Debt Service: Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance Total Debt Service Total Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) $ 134,984,300 66,556,700 13,487,500 28,097,000 21,411, 300 2,008,600 8,116,400 1,430,100 4,308,300 280,400,200 214,700 1,238,100 927,900 5,333,900 7,714,600 3,399,900 20,202,600 53,158,100 3,157,600 3,846,300 83,764,500 181,174,500 46,523,900 15,008,700 61,532,600 334,186.200 $ 141,000,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 73,151,900 17,917,800 2,688,700 7,557,300 882,800 7,265,900 334,176,900 283,200 1,502,200 1,244,300 4.999.500 8,029,200 4,994,100 14,553,300 84,811,200 4,038,800 4,848,000 113,245,400 $ 141,000,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 40,949,200 21,306,500 2,589,400 7,268,200 493,500 3,986,300 301,305,600 237,800 1,196,000 953,200 4,547,000 6,934,000 3,538,600 11,564,300 59,406,500 4,197,400 4,727,600 83,434,400 377,477,800 252,703,600 126,800,000 16,613,000 143,413,000 642.165.400 6,800,000 16,190,600 FY 13/14 Dollar Budget Change $ 147,000,000 $ 6,000,000 72,500,000 3,000,000 13,298,000 (914,500) 94,389,000 21,237,100 133, 496, 300 115, 578, 500 2,954,400 265,700 6,723,400 (833,900) 500,000 (382,800) 4.026.500 (3,239,400) 474,887,600 140, 710, 700 258,900 1,865,400 1,248,400 5.212,700 8,585,400 5,845,000 15,485,600 106,803,900 4,411,700 5.464.600 138,010,800 (24,300) 363,200 4,100 213,200 556,200 850,900 932,300 21,992,700 372,900 616,600 24,765,400 750,844,700 373,366,900 87,100,000 41,112,300 7,500,000 (39,700,000) 24,499,300 7,500.000 22,990,600 135,712,300 (7,700,700) 366.062,600 1,033,153,200 390,987,800 (53,786,000) (307,988,500) (64,757,000) (558,265,600) (250,277,100) 123,977,200 (123,977,200) 40,000,000 328,118,600 (328,118,600) 1,220,172,000 40.000.000 1,220,172,000 125,536,100 (125,536,100) 80,000,000 80.000,000 636,325,800 (636,325,800) 700,774,000 110.000.000 308, 207, 200 (308,207,200) (519,398,000) 110.000.000 810,774,000 (409,398.0001 Percent Change 4% 4% -6% 29% 645% 10% -11% -43% -45% 42% -9% 24% 0% 4% 7% 17% 6% 26% 9% 13% 22% 99% -31% 147% N/A -5% 61 ^. 81% 94% 94% -43% N/A (13,786,000) 912,183,500 15,243,000 252,508,400 (659,675,100) -72% Beginning Fund Balance 589,364,600 575,578,600 575,578,600 590,821,600 15,243,000 3% Ending Fund Balance $ 575,578,600 $ 1,487,762,100 $ 590,821,600 $ 843,330,000 $ (644,432,100) -43% Riverside Comity Transportation Commission tItiltm 61 � 1amla A )ribg Executive Management Mission Statement: "To maintain the highest level of achievement and professionalism possible while managing the activities of the Commission with a small staff complemented with consultants, to effectuate sound transportation policies and legislation compatible with environmental standards." Chart 25 — Executive Management Support Costs 22% Professional Coats 41% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 37% Executive Management has a budget of $258,900 (Table 46) for oversight of all Commission functions. The 20% decrease in salaries and benefits reflects the allocation of FTEs to other programs. Professional costs of $105,000 include legal fees and consulting services. Support costs include various membership dues and staff -related travel costs of $57,200. Table 46 — Executive Management Expenditure Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 105,200 $ 120,600 $ 83,000 $ 96,700 $ (23,900) -20% Professional Costs Legal Services 69,900 65,000 61,100 65,000 0% Professional Services - General 40,000 40,000 40,000 0% Total Professional Costs 69,900 105,000 101,100 105,000 0% Support Costs 39,600 57,600 53,700 57,200 (400) -1% TOTAL Executive Management $ 214,700 $ 283,200 $ 237,800 $ 258,900 $ (24,300) -9% Executive Management Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.01 Deputy Executive Director 0.07 0.15 Executive Director 0.19 0.19 FTE 0.26 0.35 0.01 0.10 0.15 0.26 Department Budget Overview Department Description The Executive Director is responsible for and provides strong leadership in developing and implementing new strategies at the local, regional, and statewide levels to assure delivery of transportation improvements and programs throughout the County. Furthermore, Executive Management is committed to fostering a positive and supportive work environment for staff that emphasizes quality work and encourages teamwork and open communication, with a commitment to serving the public. This is accomplished through a productive and collaborative effort with the members of the Commission and the oversight of the Commission's Executive Committee. Key Assumptions • The Executive Director will play a prominent role with external audiences with an emphasis on working with Congress, the California Legislature, Riverside County business organizations, and Southern California transportation agencies and local governments regarding advancing transportation policy in California. Policy concerns include the need for ongoing transportation investment, flexibility in project delivery methods, streamlining of environmental processes and a renewed focus of the connection between transportation projects and the overall quality of life in Riverside County. • Project delivery will be a top priority in FY 2013/14 with the major focus on initiating construction on the SR- 91 corridor improvement project through Corona. The overall budget for the project exceeds $1 billion and it will be the Commission's most significant project in its history. Construction is expected to begin in December 2013, and it will add two lanes of added capacity to Riverside County's most congested freeway corridor. The project's use of express lanes will also herald a new era of toll financing and operations. • The focus on project delivery will also be seen in the advancement of public transit with construction of the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension. • Additional ongoing projects under construction will include the 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector, SR- 91 HOV lane project, 1-215 corridor improvement project central segment, and the 1-215 bi-county project. Construction will begin on the SR-74 curve widening project near Hemet. • Yet another component of project delivery will include the need to complete the environmental review process on a number of high -profile projects including the Mid County Parkway and the SR-79 realignment. • The advancement of construction on a number of projects will require a requisite increase in public outreach to the media and local governments as well as the need for watchful oversight to make the most of lower construction and right of way costs. • The development of the Perris Valley Line project will mark Riverside County's first major rail expansion in more than 14 years and will require a significant public outreach effort during construction. • A renewed emphasis, as part of a regionwide effort, will be placed on working with local governments and stakeholders to advance active transportation projects such as bicycling, walking and transit use. Accomplishments FY 2012/13 saw extraordinary accomplishments at the Commission, placing it in the top tier of California transportation organizations. In several areas, the Commission stood by itself in successful advocacy, innovation, and leadership. • Completed construction on the 1-215 south in Murrieta which added a lane in each direction of the freeway. • Immediately after the widening of the 1-215 south, broke ground and initiated construction on the 1-215 central project between Nuevo Road and Scott Road in the communities of Menifee and Perris. • Awarded a $633 million design -build contract for the widening of SR-91 and extension of the existing 91 Express Lanes through Corona. • Obtained and negotiated a TIFIA loan amounting to one-third of the eligible TIFIA costs of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. The Commission was one of only five agencies throughout the nation to receive TIFIA funding in the April 2012 selections. • Continued to implement components of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Issued a revised Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Mid County Parkway project. • Guided the Commission through an uncertain economic environment with costs savings and successful adherence to limits on salaries and administrative expenditures. • Partnered with SANBAG to launch the 1-215 bi-county project which adds a HOV lane in each direction of the I- 215 from SR-60 to 1-10. • Continued to fund the acquisition of needed habitat for the Western Riverside County MSHCP as outlined in the Measure A Expenditure Plan. • Completed project work to ensure the allocation of Proposition 1B TCIF which has led to the construction of a number of railroad grade separations. Two of the 12 TCIF projects have been completed (Columbia Avenue and Magnolia Avenue/Union Pacific); three projects are under construction (Iowa Avenue, Streeter Avenue and the I-215/Van Buren interchange); and seven projects will start construction by December 2013 (Auto Center Drive, Avenue 52, Avenue 56, Clay Street, Magnolia Avenue/Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), Riverside Avenue and Sunset Avenue). • Advocated for and successfully obtained inclusion of the Pass Area and Coachella Valley Rail Service into the State Intercity Rail Plan. Major Initiatives FY 2013/14 will be a year of constant activity and will feature efforts to launch a number of projects. Chief among them will be the SR-91 corridor improvement project through Corona, a $1.3 billion dollar effort that will add general purpose and express lanes to a 10-mile stretch of one of southern California's most congested freeways. This will be Riverside County's largest transportation project and one of the most valuable, in terms of project cost, in the entire state. Along with the SR-91 corridor improvement project, the Commission will continue to serve as the lead agency on construction for the widening of the 1-215 central project, the SR-74 curve widening, and the Perris Valley Line. The Commission, through its partnership with Caltrans is funding construction to add HOV lanes on SR-91 through downtown Riverside and the 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector project. Yet another partnership can be seen with SANBAG in the widening of the 1-215 — known as the bi-county project. This effort adds a HOV lane in each direction to the 1-215 between SR-60 and 1-10. While the focus will certainly be on construction, project development work continues with the circulation of draft environmental documents for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment projects. In terms of advancing policy, a major concern in moving forward is the state of California's financial position and commitment to funding infrastructure and transportation. The Commission will continue to take an aggressive and active role in advocating for State investments in transportation. The Commission is an active member of the Self - Help Counties Coalition (SHCC) and Mobility 21, and a major focus will be placed on advocacy for transportation in the State budget. Federal funding is also an important factor for the Commission's future, and the Commission will advocate strongly for the approval of a federal transportation bill. Congress's priorities will need to include funding for Positive Train Control and for goods movement and freight -related projects in Southern California. In Riverside County, goods movement investments will continue to focus on the need to complete highway/rail grade separation projects. The success of many of these efforts will rely on proactive external communications. Media relations will continue to be a priority, and press releases will remain a major effort along with social media and the Commission's On the Move monthly newsletter and annual report. An expanding and systematic outreach to business and civic groups, focusing on Commission efforts in terms of funding, construction, and services, will be the central feature of the communications program. Riverside County has also seen a major change in its federal and state legislative delegations which will require a concerted outreach effort to new representatives on local transportation issues. While actively participating in all of these major endeavors, the Executive Director will maintain and improve administrative efficiency and fiscally sound practices characteristic of the Commission. With a total of 46 budgeted staff positions, the Commission organization remains consistent with Commission direction. The Commission must continue to be competitive in the employment market and retain capable staff as well as attract high quality applicants. Staff training and development will continue, enabling our small and dedicated staff to enhance skills, productivity, and value. Our goal is to maintain the most effective mid -sized transportation agency in California. Department Goals Focus on timely and effective completion of capital projects. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Begin construction and serve as lead agency on the SR-91 corridor improvement project in Corona. • Serve as the lead agency for the construction of the 1-215 corridor improvement projects. • Work closely with Ca!trans on construction of the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors project in Moreno Valley as well as the SR-91 HOV lanes project in downtown Riverside and 1-215 bi-county project. • Ensure effective communication with the public regarding construction and project details throughout the County. • Embark on construction for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension. Maximize funding for transportation improvements in Riverside County through legislative advocacy. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Implement the Commission's early development project priorities outlined in the recent Commission workshops, focusing on the first ten years of the 2009 Measure A, which will include an emphasis on project development for the SR-91 corridor improvement project and the Perris Valley Line. • Place an emphasis on initiating federally authorized and funded projects included within the new federal transportation bill and the Commission's ongoing project priorities. • Advocate federal appropriations for current projects and regional efforts to reduce the community impacts of rail goods movement. • Continue to advocate for federal investment in freight and goods movement infrastructure with the goal of mitigating community impacts while increasing capacity and local job creation and economic development. • Continue implementation of Transit Vision while addressing short- and long-term funding constraints. Support regional transportation solutions in cooperation with surrounding counties that are of benefit to Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Continue work on grade separation and rail capacity projects funded through the TCIF as well as those called for in the Commission's $561 million Grade Separation Plan. • Work with neighboring counties regarding corridor improvements on SR-91, 1-15 and 1-215. • Maintain an effective working relationship with the agencies that comprise Metrolink to ensure that Riverside County commuter rail needs are served in an efficient, effective, and safe manner. • Partner with SANBAG to enhance and publicize the 1E511 system and work with agencies in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles counties to provide effective, regional 511 traveler information services. • Play an active role in the implementation of revamping the implementation of intercity rail and commuter rail service in the Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) corridor. • Be an active participant in discussions involving high-speed rail —especially concerning connectivity investments in the overall rail system in Southern California. • Advocate for and take an active effort for additional intercity rail service to the Coachella Valley and the Pass Area. Maintain effective working relationships with Commissioners to strengthen and expand the Commission's leadership in transportation policy decision -making at all levels of government. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Facilitate Commissioner participation at the regional, state, and federal levels to raise the interests of the Commission and seek favorable action. • Continue regular communication between the Executive Director, senior staff and the Commissioners. • Continue collaborative efforts with member agency staff regarding local priorities and funding challenges. • Work with other levels of local government such as the County Transportation Department, County Health Department, and local universities on quality of life issues that are connected to transportation such as air quality and the environment. • Provide assistance to Commissioners who serve on outside boards such as SCAG and Metrolink to assist their efforts to represent Riverside County. While maintaining a relatively small staff, promote the Commission's effectiveness by improving and developing staff skills, using state-of-the-art working tools, and fostering an environment that encourages and rewards individual and team effort. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue to maintain a well -documented employee appraisal process that provides clear, understandable, and measurable performance criteria for all employees. • Maintain and encourage staff morale and effectiveness. • Retain quality staff as the economy improves. Develop the framework for a Commission culture that enhances productivity, encourages regular and open communication among staff, and promotes the mutual achievement of individual and organizational goals and objectives. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Conduct a semi-annual review of organization accomplishments as measured against planned objectives to determine progress in meeting those objectives and action steps needed. • Facilitate open communications and coordination between management, professional staff, and support staff through regular meetings. Executive Management Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Expenditures $358,560,200 $334,186,200 $366,062,600 $1,033,153,200 Staffing levels 41 40 42 46 Administration costs as percentage of expenditures 3% 2.31% 1.89% .83% Administration Mission Statement: "To provide quality and efficient services to the Board of Commissioners, staff, and external customers and to comply with applicable federal and state requirements." Chart 26 - Administration 110 Capital Outlay 21% Salaries an Benefits 34% Support Cvstsk 34% a Pmfessiareal Casts 11% Expenditures As noted in Table 47, the Administration Department's total budget is $1,865,400 for office operations including management of office space, lease, and equipment; records; Commission and committee meetings; and special events as well as for the clerk of the board and human resources functions. Salaries and benefits expenditures of $628,600 reflect an increase of 37% for FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $207,600 cover various services including, but not limited to, Commissioners' per diem, legal fees, and consultant and other professional services. Support costs of $644,200 cover administrative overhead including office maintenance; information technology updates, support, and maintenance; and recruitments. Capital outlay of $385,000 reflects an increase due to information technology equipment upgrades. Table 47 - Administration Expenditure Detail Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Commissioner Per Diem Legal Services Professional Services - General Total Professional Costs Support Costs Capital Outlay Debt Service TOTAL Administration FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Dollar Percent Change Change $ 434,000 $ 460,303 $ 398,200 $ 628,600 $ 168,300 37% 64,000 158,400 16,600 239,000 547,700 17,400 25,200 $ 1,263,300 $ 65,000 18,900 176,800 260,700 641,200 140,030 1,502,200 $ 65,000 65,000 0% 17,000 22,000 3,100 16% 59,000 120,600 (56,200) -32% 141,000 207,600 (53,100) -20% 601,800 644,200 3,000 0% 55,000 385,000 245,003 175% N/A 1,196,000 $ 1,865,400 $ 363,200 24% Administration Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Accounting Supervisor 0.01 0.01 0.01 Accounting Technician 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Assistant 2.13 1.38 1.30 Executive Director 0.00 0.00 0.00 Finance Manager/Controller 0.17 0.25 0.30 Human Resources Administrator 0.00 0.00 1.00 Office and Board Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.95 0.95 0.95 Staff Analyst 0.00 0.00 0.00 FTE 5.26 4.59 5.56 Department Budget Overview - Office Operations Department Description Office Operations oversees the daily maintenance needs of the Commission's office facility and staff; manages information technology and records management systems; oversees the office lease; purchases office supplies and equipment; posts public notices on the website and local newspaper and notices of project completion; maintains a safe working environment for Commission board members, staff, and consultants; and provides support services. Office Operations continues to operate with a small staff of six consisting of the Office and Board Services Manager, Senior Administrative Assistant, three Administrative Assistants, and Senior Office Assistant. Key Assumptions • Support is provided to 46 full-time Commission staff. • Requests for proposals and project notices of completion are posted in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. • Information technology systems are upgraded and maintained to ensure efficiency. • An accurate and efficient records management system is maintained. • Requests for public records are responded to in accordance with the California Public Records Act. Accomplishments • Updated the web page in a timely manner for the postings of public notices. • Maintained efficient information technology infrastructure. • Maintained the electronic records management system to ensure accurate and efficient processing of incoming and outgoing correspondence and documents. • Maintained a disaster recovery plan to ensure uninterrupted Commission operations. • Responded to public records requests in accordance with the California Public Records Act. Major Initiatives The Commission will continue to maintain a robust electronic records management system. Achieving greater efficiencies and strengthening the Commission's records management processes and procedures, the system pertains to the management, storage, and accessibility of the Commission's actions and documents and the retention capability for incoming and internally created records. Office Operations will continue to provide high quality support services to the Board and to internal and external customers by providing a work environment that enhances the overall mission of the Commission. Department Goal — Office Operations Ensure quality service that demonstrates responsiveness and flexibility and provides services at the most reasonable cost. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Support 46 full-time staff. • Provide accessibility to meeting agendas, legal notices, requests for proposal, and employment opportunities through the Commission's web page. • Continue to improve administrative efficiency through automation of records processing. • Provide a safe working environment with the maintenance of an injury and illness prevention program. • Post legal notices and requests for proposals on the Commission's web page and in the newspapers on a timely basis. • Provide office supplies, equipment, and services consistent with intended quality and capabilities at the most advantageous price afforded in the market. • Manage the Commission's information technology systems. Department Budget Overview — Clerk of the Board Department Description The Clerk of the Board provides support services to the Board of Commissioners and its alternates and for Commission and committee meetings. It serves as an important resource for the Commission and has the responsibility for recording, publishing, preserving, and filing meeting proceedings of documents acted upon by the Commission and its committees; posting legal notices; processing claims against the Commission; fulfilling requirements of the Commission and the committees as it relates to the Conflict of Interest Code; serving as the Filing Officer for Economic Interest and Campaign Disclosure statements and legal claims against the Commission; coordinating Commission special events and meetings; and performing all duties required by law, rules, or order of the Board. As such, this department has a direct link and responsibility to serving local taxpayers and the public while supporting the actions of the Commission. The need to be accountable to the public at large is further amplified by the need to comply with federal and state law requiring prompt responses to California Public Records Act requests. Key Assumptions • Staff support and meeting services are provided to 34 Commissioners and their alternates, the Commission, four established committees, and a number of ad hoc committees. • Monthly agenda packets and supporting documents are published and distributed in accordance with the Brown Act. • Officers and members of the Commission are kept informed by providing them with the most current and accurate data to assist them and facilitate their decision making responsibilities. • Frequent communication with Commissioners continues to provide news and updates on Commission items and transportation -related meetings. • Available technology is used to provide simplified access of agenda items and Commission actions to the public, local agencies, and staff. Accomplishments • Updated the web page and the bulletin board for the agenda, minutes, and supporting documents. • Posted legal notices in local newspapers and on the Commission's web page. • Regularly advised officers and members of the Commission and their staff on changes to Commission meetings and other transportation -related meetings. • Arranged Commission and committee meetings and special events of the Commission. • Processed and transmitted Commission -approved resolutions to appropriate agencies in a timely manner. Major Initiatives Each year, local agencies make changes to their appointments regarding their representation on the Commission. Staff will continue to make every effort to ensure that the newly appointed representatives, as well as their respective staff, are aware of operational policies of the Commission and other transportation -related meetings. There will be continued emphasis on the utilization of electronic mail with Commissioners for more efficient communications. Clerk of the Board staff will continue to provide high quality support services to the Board. Staff will also continue to update technology to streamline processes and procedures for easier access to Commission actions, minutes, resolutions, and ordinances, including electronic agenda distribution. Department Goals — Clerk of the Board Ensure coordination and documentation of Commission and committee meetings and provide public accessibility to agenda items as required by state regulations. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Provide accurate, high quality agenda packets for Commission and committee meetings. • Continue to provide support to Commission members, staff, and attendees of Commission and committee meetings. • Post meeting agendas and supporting documents in compliance with Brown Act requirements. • Maintain an accurate list of Commissioners and alternates and submit membership roster changes to the Secretary of State. • Maintain and file all Commission and committee meetings and official records of the Commission. • Perform all duties within mandated deadlines. • Maintain and promote good Commission and staff relations. Facilitate access of information to Commission records. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Continue to respond to requests for records and information on a timely basis and in accordance with state law. • Continue to improve the Commission's recordkeeping practices by updating the electronic records management system. • Maintain Commission agreements, amendments, MOUs, resolutions, and ordinances. • Maintain a centralized database for Commissioners, agencies, and consultant contact information. • Coordinate special activities, meetings, events, and conferences as requested by the Executive Director and the Commission. Department Budget Overview — Human Resources Department Description Human Resources responsibilities include administering the recruitment, selection, and appraisal process; updating and conducting a biennial survey of comparable classification and salaries and benefits; maintaining personnel policies and procedures; and scheduling periodic sessions for staff to review benefits and personnel rules and for supervisors to review the performance evaluation process. Key Assumptions • The use of consultant services for Human Resources administration is maximized. • A Human Resources Administrator will be hired to manage human resources responsibilities on a full-time basis. • The assessment of Human Resources practices and procedures will continue. • Continuous improvement in communication with employees regarding Human Resources information will be an ongoing process. • Compliance with state and federal labor law regulations is achieved. Accomplishments • Completed the biennial classification and compensation study. • Adopted a resolution in response to the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), requiring existing employees to begin paying an equal share of the normal pension costs. Effective July 11, 2013 existing employees will pay 3% toward the normal pension costs and thereafter will pay an additional 3% in FY 2014/15 and 2% in FY 2015/16 for a total annual normal pension cost contribution of 8%, offset by a corresponding salary increase. • Implemented PEPRA that creates a new defined benefit formula of 2% at age 62 for all new members hired as of January 1, 2013. • Provided the annual Benefit Statement to all employees. • Regularly provided information to employees on changes to health insurance, 401(a) defined contribution, and 457 deferred compensation plans and the personnel policies and procedures manual through the Commission's intranet and quarterly employee newsletter. • Recruited and filled two intern and six full-time positions. • Held training sessions on violence in the workplace, harassment -free workplace, and drug -free workplace. • Disclosed employees' compensation on the Commission's website in compliance with the State Controller's Office and CaIPERS. Major Initiatives Human Resources focuses on managing employees and consists of a framework of activities and practices that support and develop a motivated workforce while at the same time complying with legislation and regulations that govern the employer/employee relationship. Staff will use written position descriptions and performance expectations in order to give each employee a clear and consistent understanding of what is expected. Additionally, staff will utilize qualified human resources consultants to assist in establishing good human resources management practices, based on policies to establish parameters for fair and consistent decision -making, and to institute good workplace practices. The Commission's practice is to conduct a classification and compensation review program review every two years to ensure fair compensation is established to attract and retain the most qualified employees. After the postponement of the biennial classification and compensation review program in 2009 due to the slowdown in the economy and declining sales tax revenues, the Commission reinstituted the biennial classification and compensation review program at the request of the Executive Committee in response to the implementation of the PEPRA provisions. The Commission will provide a one-time 3% cost of living adjustment to offset the employees' contribution to the normal pension costs and up to a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases based on the performance of staff in FY 2013/14. Department Goals — Human Resources Administer human resources policies, procedures, and programs in order to align personnel laws and the Commission's policies with continuous improvement principles. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Review and update personnel policies and procedures to comply with federal and state requirements. • Provide information to enhance the employee's knowledge of current personnel policies and procedures in various forms including electronic access, workshops, and printed information. • Ensure that employee personnel records are updated timely for various personnel actions. Continue to employ and recruit a dynamic and talented workforce. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Maintain a compensation program that ensures internal equity and external competitiveness within the pay structure for Commission employees. • Exercise care in making high -quality, diverse appointments. Develop people to be their best in order to meet the needs of the organization. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Build and maintain an effective performance system to include timely performance evaluations, personal development, and a supportive work environment. • Provide appropriate and timely training to meet the demands of the organization. • Foster teamwork through cooperative efforts and support for shared success. Understand and consistently deliver excellent customer service to all employees. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objective: • Focus on "employee as customer" and consistently strive to exceed expectations by supporting and maintaining individual respect, appreciation, management accessibility, and communication. Improve the quality of the work culture. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Develop and maintain a safe working environment. • Maintain a proactive employee relations process. • Promote a work/family balance. • Recognize and reward individual contributions, innovation, and learning from experience. Administration Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Employee rules/Benefits review sessions held 1 1 1 2 Recruitments 6 7 6 5 Positions filled 6 6 6 5 Legal notices 18 13 24 26 Commission/Committee/Ad Hoc meetings 50 56 72 73 Commissioners supported (including alternates) 61 61 61 61 Staff supported: Regular full-time i Temporary/Seasonal 41 1 40 1 42 2 46 2 Legislative Affairs and Communications Mission Statement: "To improve the mobility of Riverside County residents by working through the legislative process and by maintaining effective interagency relationships. This is supported by facilitating interactive communications with the public and transportation stakeholders through various outreach and media efforts." Chart 27 — Legislative Affairs and Communications 5uFpa 15% Salaries and Benefits 41% Professional Costs 44% .J Expenditures The Legislative Affairs and Communications Department has a total budget of $1,248,400 (Table 48). Salaries and benefits have increased 28% as a result of FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $552,500 include legislative advocacy, graphic design, and website updates. Support costs of $189,200 are comparable to last year's budget. Table 48 — Legislative Affairs and Communications Expenditure Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 347,100 $ 395,000 $ 351,200 $ 506,700 $ 111,700 28% Professional Costs Legal Services 2,100 2,500 1,000 2,500 0% Professional Services - General 423,300 658,800 455,200 550,000 (108,800) -17% Total Professional Costs 425,400 661,300 456,200 552,500 (108,800) -16% Support Costs 155,400 188,000 145,800 189,200 1,200 1% TOTAL Legislative Affairs and Communications $ 927,900 $ 1,244,300 $ 953,200 $ 1,248,400 $ 4,100 0% Legislative Affairs and Communications Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.20 0.19 Community Relations Manager 0.08 0.15 Deputy Executive Director 0.66 0.65 Executive Director 0.00 0.05 Goods Movement Manager 0.00 0.05 Government Relations Manager 1.00 0.85 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.03 FTE 1.94 1.97 Department Budget Overview Department Description Legislative Affairs 0.24 0.10 0.71 0.01 0.30 1.00 0.00 2.36 Transportation issues and system enhancements affect a number of jurisdictions and stakeholders. Through proactive participation, the Commission is able to play a stronger leadership role at all levels of government to advance its interests and policy goals. The importance of this is magnified when the Commission is seeking changes in law or needs legislative authorization to move forward with a specific project. The Commission's Legislative Affairs efforts focus on taking full advantage of opportunities at both the federal and state levels when there is a potential impact to Commission programs. In doing so, the Commission maintains its role as a major legislative force and a statewide leader on a broad range of issues affecting transportation policy such as project delivery and financing. This requires the establishment and maintenance of ongoing communication with Riverside County's legislative delegations in Washington and Sacramento. The Commission accomplishes this via a combined effort that includes Commissioners, staff, and legislative consultants in the two capitals. The effort also requires working with other transportation agencies throughout the State in order to collaborate on issues of mutual concern. This cooperation takes place in a number of forums including a monthly meeting of transportation commission chief executive officers, a legislative roundtable of regional transportation advocates, Mobility 21, SHCC, and Coalition for America's Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC). In the November 2012 election, Riverside County voters sent several new legislators to Washington and Sacramento. These new elected officials bring with them new staff members and new perspectives on government policy, requiring the Commission's legislative affairs team to increase its effort to educate and partner with its delegation in both capitals. Establishing these relationships will be a major focus for the year. A chief concern continuing through FY 2013/14 is modernization of CHIA. Potential changes to this law could have significant benefits to the Commission's ability to deliver needed projects that improve mobility and benefit the environment. In Washington, it will be important to monitor the implementation of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) and prepare for the next surface transportation authorization in 2014. In terms of federal action on specific projects, the Commission was selected by the U.S. DOT to apply for a TIFIA loan in April 2012 related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. After submitting the TIFIA application in August 2012, the Commission obtained approval in February 2013 for a TIFIA loan of up to $451,000,000. The execution of this federal loan is anticipated in July 2013. The Commission's project was one of 26 letters of interest submitted for a total request exceeding $13 billion, and it was one of only five selected to submit a TIFIA loan application. The Commission will also seek to elevate its policy presence on matters pertaining to the tolling operations. In recent years, federal and state legislators have given significant attention to how tolling on highways is regulated. With the SR-91 and 1-15 corridor improvement projects on the near -term horizon, the Commission has a newfound interest in participating in these discussions. Communications The Commission is committed to communicating with and educating a broad arena of interested parties on the roles and responsibilities of the agency. An emphasis will continue to be placed on informing Riverside County residents and businesses about transportation projects and services and maintaining open communication with other transportation stakeholders. Various forms of media and communication tools are used in these outreach efforts with the overall objectives to provide accurate, informative, and easily accessible information; facilitate public participation in the Commission processes; and increase interagency coordination and cooperation. The Deputy Executive Director is responsible for communications with the news media and prepares text for Commission materials, presentations, and speeches. Along with the Executive Director, the Deputy Executive Director, Community Relations Manager, and individual project managers actively participate in public presentations at the local, regional, and state levels to represent the Commission's interests. Strong relationships with the news media are very important to ensure that the public is well informed regarding the Commission's progress in determining funding priorities, designing infrastructure improvements, and constructing projects. There are many points throughout these processes in which the public can and should play a role in shaping the future of the County's transportation network. Key Assumptions ■ The Government Relations Manager will oversee legislative affairs work efforts with guidance from the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. • The annual report to the public will be distributed throughout the County and will be posted on the Commission's website in a printable format. • The On the Move newsletter will be published and distributed electronically and posted on the Commission website. • The Speakers Bureau effort will continue to seek local community opportunities to expand outreach regarding the Commission's activities. • The Commission's website will be updated and refreshed on a regular basis. • Additional communications tools and opportunities will be explored for incorporation into the ongoing program to help build public awareness of Commission activities including radio, television, social media outlets such as Twitter, and the internet. • The Commission will continue to take a leadership role in formulating a countywide direction on federal transportation policy. • Public outreach will take a heightened role as project development activities accelerate on projects such as the SR-91 corridor improvement, 1-215 corridor improvements, the 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector, SR-91 HOV lanes, Perris Valley Line, Mid County Parkway, and SR-79 realignment. • Goods movement will remain a key policy priority for the Commission, and there will be an emphasis to ensure that Riverside County receives significant funding for this need from state and federal governments. ■ The Commission will monitor and influence the development of the national freight network required by MAP-21. • Government Relations will assist the Commission in taking a leadership role in Sacramento on modernization of CEQA. Accomplishments ■ Submitted application for and obtained approval for a TIFIA loan from the U.S. DOT for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • Published a four -page annual report supplement in three major newspapers — The Press Enterprise, Desert Sun, and The Californian — and posted the supplement on the Commission's website in a printable format. • Met with and provided SR-91 corridor improvement project tour for Senator Dianne Feinstein. • Continued to update the functionality of the Commission's website. • Continued effective relationships with the news media resulting in informative coverage regarding local and regional transportation issues and Measure A project delivery. • Provided extensive public outreach support as part of the project development process for the Mid County Parkway, Perris Valley Line, SR-91 corridor improvement, 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector, and 1-215 corridor improvement projects. • Conducted multiple public meetings as part of the environmental review process for a number of efforts including the Perris Valley Line, 1-215 corridor improvement, SR-91 corridor improvement, 74/215 interchange, and 91/71 interchange projects. ■ Supported the Rail Department in the development of various marketing materials and advertisements including weekend and holiday train services. ■ Continued to take a leadership role and collaborate with neighboring counties, local business leaders, Mobility 21, SHCC and CAGTC on many transportation policy issues in Sacramento and Washington. ■ Continued work with the Southern California National Freight Gateway collaboration to foster cooperation, coordination, and collaboration to facilitate the movement of goods through Southern California. • Developed new collateral materials for an overview of the Commission's programs and projects as well as construction projects planned for Western County, which are often distributed at public events. • Developed and distributed a Transportation Quick Reference Guide for Riverside County. The guide was designed for elected, appointed, and community leaders with an emphasis on Commission projects and funding issues. • Improved and maintained the Commission's photo library to assist with documenting the project delivery progress of the voter -approved Measure A tax program. The photo library has been used to develop PowerPoint presentations, information brochures, and TIFIA loan submissions. ■ Maintained a presence on the social networking site Twitter which can be accessed at http://twitter.com/RCTC. • Held widely attended events for the completion of the 1-215 South Project and the groundbreaking of the 1-215 Central Project. • Conducted a Small Business Forum on contracting opportunities with the Commission that attracted approximately 200 people. ■ Took an active role in providing comments and ensuring that Riverside County projects were included in the RTP. ■ Continued to provide a Commissioner -orientation program that bolsters Commissioner knowledge and participation regarding Commission projects and activities and was presented to every new Commissioner. Major Initiatives Legislative Affairs The Commission will continue to advocate strategically and effectively on the policy issues described above in Washington and Sacramento, utilizing its contract advocacy teams, coalitions, and partnerships. The Commission will seek to build on its recent successes in both capitals and continue to maintain a strong presence as a respected, knowledgeable and effective resource to policy leaders and decision -makers. Communications The Commission provides information to the public through various channels including: 1) participation at public meetings, chambers of commerce, industry associations, and service clubs; 2) production and provision of resource materials and fact sheets; 3) maintenance and enhancement of the Commission's website; and 4) development of newspaper press releases, radio and television interviews, and cable television spots. The Commission's largest publication effort to provide widespread understanding of its projects and expenditures is its four -page annual report which has been published in three area newspapers throughout the County and is now posted on the Commission's website in a printable format. A continuing emphasis will be placed on providing communications support to major project development efforts including the Perris Valley Line, the Mid County Parkway, the SR-91, 1-15, and the 1-215 projects. The need for proactive public communication and outreach remains important, as the Commission continues to move forward with the delivery of the Measure A work program. This is an area of emphasis, as the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan places the Commission in a high -profile role to deliver large-scale highway projects. This will require additional contact with the public by the Community Relations Manager. The Commission's outreach will include a proactive effort to work closely with various media formats such as print, radio, internet, and television to increase their understanding and interest in transportation issues and to generate a higher level of media coverage. Toward that end, opportunities will be identified for live or taped interviews and presentations that speak to local residents and employers and their questions concerning transportation issues. Appropriate forums may include city council meetings, local cable television, and radio. Broad distribution of On the Move, an e-mail newsletter highlighting actions of the Commission and emerging topics, will continue as part of the Commission's communications. Efforts will continue to update and expand the Commission's contact database including e-mail addresses in order to support distribution of the Commission's public information materials. New Commissioner -orientation meetings will be provided by the Executive Director, Deputy Executive Director, and Clerk of the Board in individualized settings. To supplement individual Commissioner meetings with the Executive Director, continuing education opportunities at the small group level will also be provided to Commissioners that focus on timely issues. Department Goals Foster the Commission's full involvement and input in a broad range of local, regional, state, and federal government settings. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Participate in the SHCC; California Transit Association; Southern California Legislative Roundtable; League of Cities; Mobility 21; CAGTC; Southern California National Freight Gateway Collaboration; regional, state and federal transportation agencies; and community/business organizations to influence funding and policy decisions that impact Riverside County. • Maintain a leadership role in local and regional transportation venues related to project development efforts and current and emerging issues. • Provide leadership to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) to ensure that funding for air quality -related transportation improvements is fully distributed to Riverside County jurisdictions. • Work with SCAG, WRCOG, and CVAG to monitor and respond to transportation issues involving the implementation of SB375 on smart growth planning. • Coordinate with other local agencies and business interests to modernize and reform CEQA to improve project delivery and deter frivolous lawsuits and challenges that delay projects. • Continue regular meetings at the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer level with transportation agencies throughout the region. • Conduct ongoing meetings and communication with transit providers in Riverside County. Implement the Commission's state and federal legislative program to maximize flexibility in the use of existing transportation revenues by supporting legislation to protect and increase current funding levels, ensuring an equitable distribution of available resources, streamlining administrative procedures to reduce costs and time of project development, and accelerating the allocation and use of existing resources. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Coordinate legislative activities of federal and state legislative consultants and obtain monthly reports on activities performed. • Work with board members to establish policy positions, review and analyze legislation, visit with elected representatives in Sacramento and Washington, draft legislation, and maintain strong relationships with key decision -makers. • Provide regular updates to the Commission regarding state and federal government issues. • Effectively represent the Commission before the state and federal legislative bodies, CTC, and other agencies in funding, programming, and policy matters. • Convene meetings with state, federal, and legislative staff members. Support the continuing education of Commissioners to increase their understanding of transportation -related issues at local, state, and federal levels to maximize the effectiveness of the Commission in affecting policy and funding actions. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Provide orientation training for new Commissioners. • Produce and distribute a monthly e-mail newsletter, On the Move, highlighting actions and activities of the Commission. • Provide periodic educational workshops or study sessions for Commissioners. • Provide on -going up -dates to Commissioners, via e-mail, on topical issues including projects, funding and newsworthy events impacting the Commission. Develop and maintain an information program which educates the public and other stakeholders on the roles and responsibilities of the Commission as it relates to accomplishments achieved through Measure A or other funding sources controlled or administered by the Commission. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Expand, maintain, and update information on the Commission's website including individual project websites and social media. • Annually produce a report that informs the public regarding Measure A progress and other Commission programs. • Issue news releases to the local media announcing significant achievements and providing information on Commission actions and activities. • Develop and maintain open lines of communication with news reporters to facilitate adequate and accurate news coverage. • Schedule periodic media information briefings or news conferences when a particular issue warrants it. • Expand the stock of video footage for use in production of cable television spots that feature transportation projects funded and/or implemented by the Commission. • Periodically use cable television and other forms of media such as internet sites and blogs, if appropriate, to communicate information to the public regarding the Commission's activities and services. • Coordinate and oversee message content of all Commission publications and communications to provide uniformity of message and direction. • Support the development and planning of projects in regard to public outreach and communication efforts. • Require the use of Measure A project/program signage by funding recipients to increase public awareness of Measure A accomplishments. • Continue to administer and expand the use of the Speakers Bureau to reach community members in service and other organizations. • Monitor and distribute media coverage from various outlets in the County and throughout the region to Commissioners and staff to enable them to closely follow transportation policy trends. • Provide oversight and coordination to Commission departments in the development of communications' materials. Foster and maintain effective communications with other agencies to heighten their understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the Commission and increase interagency coordination and cooperation. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objective: • Assign designated staff members to attend other agency meetings and require staff to provide written/verbal communication on topics of discussion during regular staff meetings. Legislative Affairs and Communications Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 I FY 13/14 Estimated Projected Speakers bureau presentations 35 35 55 55 Legislative action submittals to Commission 9 9 9 9 Southern California legislative staff roundtables 8 8 10 9 Finance Mission Statement: "To safeguard the Commission's assets and maintain strong and prudent fiscal controls in investing, accounting, budgeting, procurements, and financial reporting including ongoing disclosure to all interested parties. Seek financing alternatives that complement the Commission's strategic direction." Chart 28 — Finance Debt Service 49% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 8% Professional Costs 1 36% I i Support Costs 7% The Finance Department's total budget is $10,212,700 (Table 49) and reflects a 2% increase over the prior year's budget. Department staffing costs will total $840,300, reflecting an increase due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $3,701,700 include various services related to general and specialized legal, financial and investment advisory, external and internal audits, debt management, CAFR and annual budget graphic design, and procurement. Support costs of $664,700 include insurance, printing, and staff training. Capital outlay of $6,000 includes ERP updates. A transfer out of $5,000,000 is related to funding a portion of the debt service interest payments from the 2009 Measure A Western County bond financing program. Table 49 —Finance Expenditure Detail Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Leg( Services AdtServices Rrnndal Advisory Professional Services-Caneral Tatal Professiord Casts *vat Costs Capital Cutla/ Transfers Chit TOTALRnance FY13/12 FY12/13 FY12/13 FY13/14 Dolls Fervent Actual RevisedBuctet Projected ChwiSe aalle $ 832,ECo $ :%: 603 $ 774,C O $ 84:13:0 $ 11,71) 1% 3137C0 233000 2381900 2830m 93CC0 2 / 332,200 447,C00 447,CC0 483000 33C00 7'/0 733:0 3E4C00 125,CC0 283Cm 95 01) 51% 3174,70 _ UE2,103 2249,033 2,e31.X0 9 TO a/0 3,977,8b 3,514]OU 3119,90D arc, o 1f37,61:0 9% 516900 Ef3480 647,E EaX0 7,90D ro 7,CCO 5503 f C00 4000 N/A ]gC03000 5001COD S,COQC O 5iC IICO) - 0•' $ 15333900 $ 9,991900 $ 9,547,OOD $ 111212,7C0 $ 2 lio ?✓ Finance Staffing Summary Position FY W12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Accounting Assistant 2.00 2.00 Accounting Supervisor 0.99 0.99 Accounting Technician 2.00 2.00 Administrative Assistant 0.01 0.22 Chief Financial Officer 0.57 0.60 Executive Director 0.01 0.03 Finance Manager/Controller 0.83 0.75 Procurement Analyst 0.48 0.04 Procurement Manager 0.10 0.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.04 0.04 FTE 7.03 6.67 Department Budget Overview Department Description Finance and Accounting 2.00 0.99 2.00 0.39 0.48 0.00 0.70 0.16 0.13 0.05 6.90 Commission resources are allocated to assure financial stability and fiscal accountability. Finance activities include investing the Commission's cash resources, planning and directing financial transactions, and subsequent monitoring of legal and regulatory requirements. Adequate cash flow must be maintained while at the same time prudently investing operating and capital funds. Borrowing needs are carefully planned using both short- and long- term debt. Once debt is issued, there are ongoing responsibilities including interaction with financial advisors, bankers, dealers and remarketing agents, underwriters, bond counsel, bond insurers, trustees, issuing and paying agents, arbitrage consultants, and rating agencies as well as providing regular and consistent information disclosure to investors. Fiscal accountability involves receiving all funds due the Commission, paying all Commission obligations, maintaining the general ledger, reporting regularly on the Commission's fiscal results, and preparing and monitoring the budget. Fiscal accountability requires the coordination of budget planning and monitoring and the accurate and timely accounting for all funding sources, including compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing those funds. Accounting encompasses cash receipt and disbursement functions, maintenance of the general ledger including project cost accounting, payroll processing, quarterly and annual financial reporting, and retention of and coordination with independent auditors. The Commission also recognizes the importance of accountability for the organization. As a result, the Commission is highly regarded by individuals, peers, other organizations, and government officials at a local, regional, state, and national basis. A formal organizational accountability program was approved in January 2006 to address fraud risk, ethical conduct, financial and operational disclosure, and maintaining the public's confidence in the Commission. Accordingly, measures have been implemented based on a conceptual framework related to oversight, reporting, fraud, internal control, and ethics. Procurement Management In the management of the procurements and contracts process, the responsibility of the procurement management function is to ensure that the procurement policies approved by the Commission are followed and procurement procedures are updated as required. The function is responsible for the purchase of all goods and services, except for real property acquisition, in accordance with Commission policies and federal and state funding requirements to ensure the implementation of the Commission's projects and programs. This includes the administration of the Commission's DBE and SBE programs. Procuring goods and services for the Commission is a cooperative effort. All Commission staff involved in procurements for their projects and programs are responsible to employ sound judgment and appropriate standards of ethics and fairness to procure in a manner most advantageous to the Commission. The Procurement division also conducts a review of and updates insurance coverage for the Commission and its properties. Key Assumptions • The commercial paper program will continue as a short-term financing vehicle for the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan projects; however, one of the two letters of credit providing credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper program will be terminated and the commercial paper program reduced to $60,000,000 after financial close for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • The sales tax revenue bond SBPAs facilities will be maintained with the current short-term ratings. • Proceeds from the sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, and TIFIA loan will be used to fund the SR-91 capital improvement project. • Arbitrage calculations related to the outstanding debt issues will be performed by a consultant on an annual basis. • The Commission will pay 100% of the annual required contribution related to postretirement health care benefits based on a new actuarial valuation. • Directors and program managers will continue to have adequate project budget and accounting information to make informed decisions. • Construction fund bond proceeds will be invested in mid-term securities that mature in accordance with the construction draw schedule. Operating funds will be invested in state and local agency investment pools for short-term liquidity purposes and in mid-term treasury and federal agency securities as available funds are identified. The overall interest rate is conservatively projected to be .25% for state and County investment pools and .75% for funds held by the toll -supported debt trustee for debt service and construction funds. • Procurements will be conducted in accordance with the Commission's procurement policy manual. • Procurement will continue to develop and implement a standardized procurement filing system and maintain centralized procurement files. • Procurement will conduct outreach activities to encourage DBE and SBE participation in various contracts. Accomplishments • Conducted an internal audit review of the prime/sub-contractor invoice process. • Issued a request for proposal and awarded a contract for trustee services for the sales tax revenue bonds construction and toll revenue bonds proceeds in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • Issued a request for proposal and awarded a contract for investment management services for operating and capital funds. • Developed a plan of finance for the SR-91 corridor improvement project with the assistance of financial advisor and underwriters as well as various counsel. • Submitted a TIFIA loan application followed by a presentation to the U.S. DOT TIFIA Joint Program Office and approval of a TIFIA loan for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Negotiations on the TIFIA loan are expected to conclude with the execution of a TIFIA loan agreement in July 2013. • Presented the SR-91 corridor improvement project plan of finance to the three rating agencies in order to maintain the Commission's AA rating related to sales tax revenue bonds and obtain investment grade ratings for the toll revenue bonds and TIFIA loan. • Obtained financial reporting excellence award from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) (20`h year) related to the CAFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. • Obtained GFOA distinguished budget award (17th year) for annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012. • Generated over $2 million in additional Measure A sales tax revenue since the engagement of a firm in January 2008 to provide sales tax audit services in order to detect and correct reporting errors. • Participated in the development of the three -party toll operations agreement related to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. • Revised the Procurement Policy Manual to provide comprehensive guidance regarding federal, state and local procurement policies and produced a Quick Reference Guide poster related to procurements. • Implemented PlanetBids Online system software, an e-procurement solution for online vendor and procurement management. • Completed a FTA procurement systems review. • Participated in numerous small business networking activities and met with potential DBE and SBE vendors. • Hosted a small business forum for military veterans and DBE/SBEs to learn about contracting opportunities available through the Commission. • Participated in the Member Agency Advisory Committee to provide guidance and recommendations regarding Metrolink finances. Major Initiatives Finance and Accounting The commercial paper program has been in place for over eight years and has provided short-term, advance funding for projects included in the 2009 Measure A and related Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. Commission management will continue to consider appropriate uses of commercial paper to advance 2009 Measure A projects. The letters of credit supporting the commercial paper program expire in October 2014; however, the Commission will terminate one of the two letters of credit and reimbursement agreements providing credit and liquidity support in order to reduce the commercial paper program to $60,000,000. In connection with the 2009 variable rate bonds, the Commission entered into SBPAs with JPMorgan, which were extended through September 2014. The Commission will monitor the credit quality of the banks providing these liquidity facilities for any actions which may affect the short-term ratings of the commercial paper program and 2009 Bonds. Staff continues to develop a comprehensive financing plan to support the highway and rail capital projects to be delivered through 2019 and to assess future financing requirements. This financing plan incorporates revised sales tax revenue forecasts as well as other potential federal, state, and local revenue sources, including tolls. Based on the updated cost estimates for these projects and identified revenues, potential project funding shortfalls may result in project deferrals or require alternative financing strategies. Financing alternatives to be considered include commercial paper, long-term bond issues to finance Measure A and toll projects, and federal loan programs. A significant effort the past few years related to a plan of finance for the SR-91 corridor improvement project will culminate in July 2013 with financial close of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds, 2013 Toll Bonds, and federal TIFIA loan. During FY 2013/14, the Commission will consider financing opportunities related to the 2009 Bonds and 2010 Bonds that minimize exposure to fluctuating interest rates and federal budget issues. As a result of the significant financing proceeds received in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement plan of finance, the Commission will invest such funds as well as available operating funds with the advice and assistance of investment managers and advisors. Investments will be made in accordance with the Commission's priorities of safety, liquidity, and then yield. The investment managers and advisors will also review the Commission's investment policy for any required updates and other recommendations. To ensure that the Commission receives the proper amount of Measure A sales taxes, the Commission will continue to engage a firm to conduct sales tax audit services. The firm will also provide quarterly sales tax analysis and reporting services, of which a summary report is presented to the Commission on a quarterly basis. The Commission will also engage a consultant to provide semi-annual sales tax forecasts. The Finance Department will continue to keep abreast of GASB technical activities affecting the Commission's accounting and financial reporting activities. Various new standards will be considered for early implementation as part of the preparation of the CAFR for the year ended June 30, 2013. The Finance Department will also continue to consider changes to accounting and financial reporting related to the commencement of toll operations in FY 2016/17. The Finance Department will continue to update its ERP system that integrates data processing across the Commission, automate administrative processes, and embrace data integration. The continued ERP efficiency gains include an automated paperless workflow system, advanced project accounting, multi -year budgeting, multi -year contract management, grant tracking, and readily available scanned images that can be retrieved by all users. Procurement Management A centralized procurements process will continue to be implemented to manage requests for proposals, qualifications, invitations for bids, small purchases, and related contract administration issues. The Procurement Policy Manual was recently updated to reflect current best practices and applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Accordingly, the procurement system will strengthen controls to ensure consistency in the development and application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable laws and regulations, especially those related to federal and state grants. Procurement Management is responsible for developing, implementing, and monitoring DBE and SBE program requirements in coordination with contractors and other appropriate officials. Duties and responsibilities include establishing DBE attainment goals, monitoring reporting and utilization by contractors, gathering and reporting statistical data and other information as required, reviewing third party contracts and purchase requisitions for compliance with the program, ensuring that bid notices and requests for proposals are made available to DBEs and SBEs in a timely manner, reporting to and advising the Executive Director and Commission on DBE and SBE matters, and providing outreach to DBEs and SBEs to fully advise them of contracting opportunities. During FY 2013/14 the Commission will host and attend several outreach events in order to acquaint potential vendors with the Commission's procurement procedures and opportunities. Staff also consults with the Commission's insurance broker in procuring competitive quotes, on an annual basis, for various insurance coverages secured by the Commission in order to provide cost effective solutions to meet its diverse insurance needs. Department Goals Protect the Commission's cash resources by regular monitoring of investment practices to ensure consistency with established investment policy. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Utilize investment management and advisory services to prudently invest operating and capital funds in accordance with the Commission's investment policies. • Achieve a rate of return at least equal to the County of Riverside Treasury Pool rate for operating funds. • Establish an appropriate benchmark for the investment of debt proceeds. Manage the Commission's outstanding debt ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations and continued investor awareness and receptivity to the Commission's program. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Provide an annual update and review of the debt programs with one or more of the rating agencies no later than June 30, 2014. • Meet continuing disclosure requirements of the debt programs and comply with the TIFIA loan reporting requirements. • Prepare arbitrage calculations as required. Ensure the Commission and funding recipients comply with Measure A and TDA laws and regulations as they relate to the annual financial and compliance audits as well as close cooperation and coordination with independent auditors. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Minimize the number of substantive management letter comments and compliance findings requiring corrective action by the Commission. • Maintain appropriate fiduciary review and monitoring procedures for Measure A recipient and TDA claimant audits. Maintain fiscal and budgetary control through monitoring of periodic results and ensuring consistency with the Commission's strategic direction. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Obtain the GFOA Distinguished Budget Award for the FY 2013/14 budget. • Facilitate a comprehensive budgeting approach that effectively involves management staff, requiring full accountability for all department expenditures. • Fund 100% of the annual required contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. Assure fiscal accountability for Commission funds with general ledger accounting and financial reporting consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Ensure proactive communication and timely responses to any noted errors, corrections, and budget transfers related to program management reviews of accounting and budget information. • Obtain an unqualified opinion on the basic financial statements. • Receive financial reporting excellence award from the GFOA related to the preparation and issuance of the CAFR. • Stay abreast of finance, accounting, and financial reporting developments by attending training and conferences in these general areas or in specialized areas applicable to job duties. • Update and maintain the fiscal policies and procedures manual. • Update and maintain complete accounting desk procedures manual for ERP system to facilitate cross training. • Assist local governments with Measure A funding by providing timely allocation of funds for eligible projects and financing opportunities to the extent funding does not impact other programs and is financially feasible and prudent. • Maintain ERP system to reflect technical updates and current technology. • Commence development of accounting and financial process with the RCTC 91 Express Lanes operator and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in preparation for start of toll operations in 2017. Develop and maintain an organizational accountability program encompassing financial and operational functions. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Establish and implement measures related to oversight, fraud, internal control, and ethics. • Issue annual disclosure statements related to financial and operational responsibilities. Procure goods and services from qualified consultants, contractors, and other vendors in accordance with laws and regulations at a competitive price. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Assist departments and programs to procure and obtain goods and services in a cost effective and efficient manner. • Ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with a comprehensive Procurement Policy Manual. • Ensure that agreements, amendments, and MOUs are entered into with appropriate legal considerations. • Process agreements, amendments, and MOUs in a timely and efficient manner. • Ensure that consistent procedures, processes, and tools are used for procurements. Review existing procurement policies and procedures. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Ensure that the procurement polices reflect Commission requirements and practices. • Segregate policies and procedures so that procedures can be easily updated without Commission approval. • Ensure that procurement policies and procedures reflect the requirements of the Commission's federal, state, and other funding sources. • Provide an easy to read desktop quick procurement policies reference guide for use by Commission staff. • Maximize the value received for the Commission's expenditure of public funds. • Provide all vendors an equal opportunity to provide needed goods and/or services. Finance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Sales tax revenue bond rating Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Toll revenue bond rating N/A N/A N/A BBB-/BBB- TIFIA loan rating N/A NJA N/A BBB - Commercial paper rating P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ GFOA Certificate of Achievement Awarded Awarded Awarded Awarded GFOA Distinguished Budget Award Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Invoices processed 4,100 5,545 5,600 5,800 Checks processed 3,100 3,762 3,800 4,000 Audit adjustments 0 0 0 0 Average yield on investments .50% .30% .25% .25% operating / .75% debt proceeds Payroll hours processed 72,700 82,209 87,300 95,000 Accounts receivable invoices processed 160 176 180 200 Agreements processed 180 203 150 160 Riverside (Aunty Transportation C.ommission MirA Nbid Prg Planning and Programming Mission Statement: "To exert leadership in transportation planning and the programming of funds to improve mobility, foster environmental stewardship, expedite project delivery, and form partnerships with regional, state, and federal agencies resulting in maximum returns on local investment. Support a coordinated regional approach to solving transportation funding issues." Chart 29 — Planning and Programming Protects and Operations 74% Expenditures Professional Costs 8% ~`LSupport Costs 0% Planning and Programming expenditures of $5,845,000 have increased 17% from last year's budget (Table 50). Salaries and benefits represent 18% of total expenditures and reflects an increase due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services totaling $487,500 have increased 34% compared to the FY 2012/13 budget due to walkability grant activities and air quality assessments. Professional services include CMP implementation efforts, air quality analysis, project database management, local and regional planning activities, on -call goods movement consultants, and legal services. Projects and operations costs have increased 14% due to an increase in LTF disbursements for planning and programming activities and rail allocations related to grade separation projects in the cities of Corona, Jurupa Valley, and Riverside and the County. Table 50 - Planning and Programming Expenditure Detail FY11/12 FY72/13 FY12,/13 FYl'?i/14 Ma Percent Adel Revised Budget Projected Burt Gine Charge $ 904800 $ EB5,8:0 $ SE42m $ 1.CB2700 $ 1%900 24' Salaries and Benefits Professiond Costs Legal Services Professional Services-Gareral Total Professional Costs Support Casts Projects and Operations Spedd Stucies Cperatirg and Capital Disbaserrents Total Projects and Operations Capital Outlay TOTALPla-rirgand Picgrarrrirg 17,E 21,900 17,0 0 21,930 1.15,7CO 343900 181,000 41:6000 M,900 3Ei2,800 1%000 4R500 17,400 24300 16400 23,300 147,830 61Ci000 2501C00 614000 2,1758a) 3,161200 2.115o00 368Z9:0 2,323,600 3,771,200 23155003 4301,9o0 27,200 $ 3,399i900 $ 4934,103 $ 3,53$0:0 $ 5845,000 $ Planning and Programming Staffing Summary Position Administrative Assistant Chief Financial Officer Deputy Executive Director Executive Director Goods Movement Manager Planning & Programming Director Planning & Programming Manager Procurement Analyst Project Development Director Senior Staff Analyst Staff Analyst FTE Department Budget Overview Department Description FY 11/12 0.10 0.04 0.16 0.44 0.96 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.11 1.00 1.04 003 -2%/ 125100 37'% 124700 34' ROM 4/0 4,030 1% 525300 17% at KO 14% N/A 85Q900 17% FY 12/13 FY 13/14 0.45 0.02 0.13 0.36 0.70 0.00 0.95 0.02 0.06 0.97 1.09 0.17 0.04 0.05 0.47 0.70 1.00 0.85 0.00 0.10 0.95 0.99 4.80 4.75 5.32 The Commission is responsible for short- and long-range transportation planning and programming. Short-range planning and programming involves the development of the five-year STIP and preparation of the five-year FTIP for Riverside County. These programming documents identify projects and their respective funding and schedules. The Commission's involvement with long-range planning efforts includes the coordination and input into planning efforts throughout the County and southern California region. These efforts involve participation in local, bi- county, and regional corridor studies, including the continued development of the CETAP corridors. Regional planning efforts are incorporated in the RTP (a 30-year transportation plan) developed by SCAG in conjunction with county transportation commissions, sub -regional agencies, local agencies, transit operators, and other interested parties. The Commission is responsible for approving projects for Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds in Western County and coordinating with Ca!trans on the selection of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds as part of the STIP approved by the CTC every two years. The Commission has delegated the authority to nominate projects for RIP funds in the Coachella Valley to CVAG. A MOU between the city of Blythe, representing Palo Verde Valley, and the Commission allows the city to trade RIP funds for local Measure A funds. In November 2006, Proposition 1B was approved by the voters of California, which provided $20 billion in transportation infrastructure funding. Various program categories were established including a $2 billion infusion into the STIP. Other competitive program categories included CMIA and TGIF; Riverside County was successful in receiving CMIA funding for the SR-91 HOV lanes and 1-215 widening projects as well as TCIF funding for 12 grade separation projects and a ground access improvement project at the I-215/Van Buren interchange. The Commission is a member of the Southern California Consensus Group that developed and submitted project proposals for the TCIF program. As with the RIP and IIP funds, Proposition 1B funds are administered and allocated by the CTC. Given the current economic conditions, Proposition 1B funds have been the most reliable state funding source for transportation projects. Proposition 1B CMIA funds are legislatively set to expire by the end of 2013. SLPP funding is another program authorized by Proposition 1B. A formula program has been established for transportation agencies that administer self-help transportation sales tax programs. Riverside County's formula share over the five-year program was $58.941 million. SLPP funds must be programmed for construction and matched by the sales tax on a 50-50 basis. The Commission approved three projects in Western County, and CVAG selected six projects in the Coachella Valley. SLPP fund allocation requests must be submitted and approved by the CTC's June 2013 meeting. Programming specifically involves the development, review, and approval of projects for various funding programs. Additionally, programming involves the monitoring of projects from project selection through construction close- out. In order to receive federal funds and approvals, all projects funded with federal and state dollars, or local projects that are regionally significant, must be included in the RTP and FTIP. SCAG is responsible for incorporating all six county (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) transportation improvement programs into one regional programming document and conducting a conformity analysis with the adopted air plans to ensure compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The RTP is updated every four years, and the FTIP update effort is performed every 18 to 24 months. Multiple amendments occur within each RTP and FTIP cycle. FTIP amendments can occur for minor project changes that do not affect the conformity analysis. The Commission is responsible for allocating the following local, state, and federal funding sources: Local Sources: • 1989 and 2009 Measure A • Western County TUMF regional arterial program State Sources: • SB821 bicycle and pedestrian projects • RIP • Proposition 1B Federal Sources: • Congressional discretionary programs, such as ARRA • Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) (formerly TE) • STP • CMAQ The Commission also serves as the CMA for the County and is responsible for developing and updating the CMP. The CMP was developed to meet state legislation and federal Congestion Management System (CMS) requirements, which includes an enhanced traffic monitoring system. The CMP's highways and regional arterials are regularly monitored to ensure that they are operating at acceptable levels (above Level of Service (LOS) "F"). If a deficiency occurs along the CMP system, a deficiency plan must be prepared that identifies mitigation measures and/or projects that will improve the LOS to "E" or higher. Partnership development, public and private, is critical to the Commission's continued success in affecting positive transportation decisions to meet future demands. Commission staff works in close coordination with its partners to advocate for federal, state, and local funding to improve mobility and mitigate the impacts of goods movement. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue its efforts in working with transportation partners to streamline and improve project delivery. • Consultant contracts are maintained to provide assistance with the CMP, air quality analysis, project database management, and other related planning activities. • The Commission will utilize all available funding sources on transportation projects identified in the 1989 Measure A and the 2009 Measure A as well as other regional high priority projects, including TUMF regional arterial projects and grade separation projects. • The Commission will continue participation in local, bi-county, and regional planning efforts representing the interests of the County. • The Commission will work with the CTC, Caltrans, and local project sponsors to implement projects funded with STIP-RIP, CMIA, SLPP formula, and TCIF to ensure that the programming and allocations are consistent with project schedules. • The Commission will continue to assist local project sponsors with the processing of state and federal funding approvals/obligations/allocations and overall project delivery. Accomplishments • Processed 32 STIP actions that consisted of but were not limited to: allocations, financial allocation amendments, programming of funds, future consideration of funding, and baseline agreement amendments. • Completed the technical studies and prepared the draft recirculated environmental document and project report for the modified Mid County Parkway project. • Completed four local agency agreements and/or amendments for the implementation of TUMF regional arterial projects. • Processed over 53 project amendments into the 2011 FTIP and 148 project amendments in the 2013. • Coordinated with Caltrans and project sponsors regarding the obligation of federal and state funding, met obligation deadlines, and prevented loss of funding to the County. • Monitored federal funding expenditures of inactive projects to ensure funds are not deobligated. • Advised local agencies and coordinated the use of toll credits and local match waiver for federally funded projects funded at the maximum reimbursement level, saving the Commission and local agencies up to $23.3 million in local match funds. Of the $23.3 million, $1.66 million toll credits were programmed and obligated in FY 2012/13. • Reviewed and approved five-year capital improvement plans (CIP) for each local agency in the County. • Processed one RTP project amendment. • Worked with Southern California agencies to develop MAP-21 funding distribution recommendations. • Monitored expansion projects for each of the Ports. • Monitored TCIF project development to ensure timely completion of the it grade separations and a ground access improvement project to improve the I-215/Van Buren interchange as required for the $162.7 million Proposition 1B TCIF funds. One project (Columbia Avenue in Riverside) was completed in March 2010; an additional project (Magnolia Avenue in Riverside) was completed in January 2012. Currently under construction are the Iowa Avenue grade crossing and the I-215/Van Buren interchange project. Two additional grade separation projects, Auto Center Drive in Corona and Streeter Avenue in Riverside, are projected to start construction by March 2013. The remaining six TCIF projects will start construction no later than January 2014. • Developed the 2012 Grade Separation Funding Strategy: A Blueprint for Advancing Projects. • Continued to take a leadership role and work collaboratively with the five -county consensus working group, Mobility 21, SCAG's Southern California National Freight Gateway Collaboration, and the CAGTC on goods movement issues. Major Initiatives Each county transportation commission throughout the State is responsible for programming RIP funds, which represents 75% of the total STIP funding available statewide for capital enhancement projects. The 75% funding level is then further distributed with 60% of the funds allocated to Southern California and 40% to Northern California. A population formula is then applied to determine county funding levels called "county shares." The Commission is responsible for ensuring that projects funded with STIP funding are administered and implemented consistent with CTC and Caltrans policies. It is the Commission's policy to set aside 2% off the top for staff support to carry out STIP PPM activities. The remaining RIP funds are further distributed geographically among Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley per the Commission's intra-county STIP formula. The Commission also may consider a call for projects for RIP discretionary funds. Federal TAP funds are also administered through the STIP. TAP funds are not subject to general fund diversions; however, TAP funds are authorized each year by the passage of the state budget. MAP-21 directs TAP funds to be distributed through a minimum of four competitive processes. Federal and state guidance will be issued over the next few months that will outline the distribution and administration of the TAP funds including project categories. CMIA and TCIF funds are monitored by Caltrans and the CTC. Baseline agreements are developed for each project under these programs. Any changes to project funding, scope, or schedule will require an amendment to the baseline agreement. The CTC allocates the CMIA and TCIF funds, and the process for allocating the funds is similar to the process established for STIP funds. TUMF funds are collected and administered by WRCOG. Approximately half of the TUMF funds collected are set aside for WRCOG's zone projects and regional transit facilities. After the deduction of an administrative fee, WRCOG provides the other half of the TUMF revenues to the Commission. These funds are further distributed to the Commission's TUMF CETAP corridors and regional arterial programs. In September 2004, the Commission established a five-year program and approved the programming of 24 regional arterial projects. To date, $100 million has been programmed for TUMF regional arterial projects. Due to fluctuating TUMF revenues over the past few years, $11.5 million in 2009 Western County Measure A regional arterial (MARA) funds and $25.5 million in TUMF CETAP funds were programmed on two projects to fulfill the TUMF commitment. Of the 24 TUMF regional arterial projects, six projects have completed construction, eight projects are currently under construction or will begin construction in FY 2013/14, and five additional projects are anticipated to begin construction in FY 2014/15. Six projects have been placed on hold at the request of the local agency. Planning and Programming also manages the 2009 Western County MARA program. The expenditures for these regional arterial capital projects are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. Transportation Planning The Commission's role in planning throughout the year will involve working with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), FTA, Caltrans, SCAG, sub -regional agencies, local agencies, and the other county transportation commissions in the region on various planning efforts relative to the implementation of the 2012 RTP/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), corridor studies, goods movement studies, and efforts to update transportation computer models and project databases. In FY 2013/14 the Commission will continue its work efforts on the intra-county CETAP corridors. An updated environmental document and project report has been prepared for the Mid County Parkway to address changes made to the project limits, which are now between SR-79 and 1-215. The recirculated/supplemental draft environmental document was released for public review and comment in January 2013. Final project approval and conclusion of the environmental phase is expected in Spring 2014. Work on a portion of the north -south CETAP corridor is underway with the Commission's 1-215 south widening project and improvements to the French Valley Parkway interchange being led by the city of Temecula. Given funding constraints, work on the two inter -county CETAP corridors by the Commission is not expected in this fiscal year. The FY 2013/14 CMP effort will involve updating the CMP (as required by federal CMS regulations). The update will involve an analysis of the level of service on the CMP system, review and incorporation of any new state and federal requirements, and aligning requirements for consistency with the RTP/SCS. Transportation Programming As mentioned above, the Commission is responsible for allocating various local, state and federal funds. These funds are monitored to ensure that regulations are adhered to in order to prevent funds from lapsing. The following summarizes the status of these funding programs: Local Funding Western County TUMF Regional Arterial Program Project monitoring of TUMF regional arterial projects by Planning and Programming staff will occur according to the agreements between local agencies and the Commission. In addition, Commission staff will work with local agencies regarding amendments to agreements and any issues regarding project delivery. To date, 24 project agreements have been executed totaling approximately $100 million of TUMF regional arterial funds. During FY 2013/14, a total of $46 million is anticipated to be reimbursed to local agencies for TUMF regional arterial projects. These project expenditures are included in the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial Program A call for projects is being planned for the 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial program. To date, this funding source has been reviewed for qualifying projects on a case by case basis. Two TUMF regional arterial projects and three MARA projects have been approved for these funds totaling $18.8 million. The balance of available MARA funds will be included in the upcoming call for projects, which will also include federal fund sources. 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads In order to receive Measure A local streets and roads funding, each year local jurisdictions are required to submit their five-year CIP based on Measure A revenue projections. Additionally, the local jurisdictions are required to submit a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) certification consistent with adopted MOE guidelines and participate in the MSHCP and in the local agency's respective TUMF program, as applicable. Amendments to CIPs are processed administratively for minor changes that do not affect the total programmed amount or are within budget levels. Significant changes require Commission approval. State Funding STIP- RIP/IIP STIP funding continues to be unstable with a minimal amount of programming capacity resulting from the last two STIP cycles. Proposition 113 has provided funding for STIP projects and other bond program categories such as CMIA, TCIF, and SLPP. However, the State's declining revenues and budget impasses have limited the frequency and timing of bond issuances. The recent economic challenges created an advantage for construction projects with a low bid environment. Cost savings for STIP and Proposition 1B projects have resulted in additional programming capacity, and the Commission will be prepared to apply for these additional funds. This year Commission staff will continue to deliver projects programmed in the 2012 STIP and work with local agencies to ensure that bond funds are allocated by the respective deadlines. Staff will also be involved with the development of the 2014 STIP guidelines and federal/state Active Transportation (AT) program development working with the CTC, Caltrans, SCAG, and regional transportation planning agencies. 58821 Annually, the Commission releases a call for bicycle and pedestrian projects in April. These projects are funded by 2% of LTF revenues, as required by SB821. The Commission establishes an evaluation committee to rank eligible projects that meet the established criteria. Project recommendations are approved by the Commission in June of each year. The Commission approved seventeen projects in the amount of $1.635 million for FY 2012/13. The FY 2013/14 call for projects will have new funding of approximately $1.38 million available for award. These expenditures are included in the LTF special revenue fund, which is reflected in the Public and Specialized Transit Department since this fund's activities relate primarily to transit funding. Federal Funding CMAQ STP, and TE The Commission is responsible for allocating CMAQ and STP funds to transportation projects in the County. In 2003, the Commission directed staff to program SAFETEA-LU funds (CMAQ and STP) to projects that were impacted by the state budget crisis and/or the rise in construction material costs with the exception of the CMAQ funding that is apportioned to the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The Commission delegates the selection of projects for CMAQ funds apportioned to the SSAB to CVAG. In 2007, the Commission approved 25% of future CMAQ and STP funds for grade separation projects approved in the Proposition 1B TCIF program. With the decline in State revenues over the past few years, the Commission has focused funds toward high priority regional projects that are ready for construction. Through the passage of MAP-21, CMAQ funding levels and project categories have changed to include the consideration of Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 non -attainment areas and direct funding to PM 2.5 projects such as diesel retrofits. Funding levels will be identified in the near future as FHWA develops new CMAQ guidance. MAP-21 restructured the former TE program, which was administered and programmed in the STIP by the CTC. The State is currently developing an AT program that will consolidate federal and state funding that traditionally funded bicycle and pedestrian projects. Although TAP funds are federal, state budget authority must be granted in order for the funds to be allocated by the CTC. If the State budget approval is delayed, the TAP funds cannot be allocated until the State budget is passed. In 2005, the Commission approved 18 projects totaling $17.6 million. To date, 17 projects have been delivered, and the remaining project will be allocated in FY 2012/13. In FY 2011/12 the Commission partnered with Caltrans and wildlife agencies on a TE project in the Santa Ana Canyon. The Commission approved use of regional TE funds for the improvement of the B Canyon wildlife corridor, which is widely used by small to mid -sized mammals between the Cleveland National Forest, Santa Ana River, and the Puente -Chino Hills. Funding from the partner agencies is still being secured. Project Monitoring The high demand for reporting and monitoring the progress of projects is essential to prevent funds from lapsing. The programming project database, Fundtrack, allows for efficient monitoring of project schedules and funding. Local agencies have been provided access to project information as well as the capability to update their respective project information in a timely manner. The Planning and Programming Department provides assistance to the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department and local agencies by participating in regular project delivery team meetings and preparing and submitting requests for authorization (RFA)/allocation of federal and state funding. In addition, Programming monitors allocation and award deadlines, expenditures, project closeouts, and inactive projects of federal and state funded projects to prevent loss of funds. Regional issues The Commission's work effort will remain focused on facilitating ongoing commitments as well as being responsive to various emerging issues. These include bi-county issues with the counties of San Bernardino, Orange, Imperial, and San Diego as well as goods movement. The Commission will continue working with partners from the Southern California Consensus Group (Ports, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority, SANBAG, OCTA, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Ventura County Transportation Commission, SCAG, and SCRRA) regarding goods movement issues. A priority will be to coordinate with legislative staff and advocacy groups such as Mobility 21 and CAGTC to secure funding through the federal transportation bill for goods movement -related needs such as the funding of Alameda Corridor East grade separations in the County and/or the creation of a federal freight trust fund, or similar program with a dedicated and firewalled revenue structure, in order to treat the nation's multimodal national goods movement network as a system rather than individual projects. The Commission will continue to monitor the Ports' projects for possible impacts on Riverside County by reviewing agendas and requesting notices for projects under CECW and the Brown Act. Department Goals Build upon relationships with local, state, and federal agencies to coordinate short- and long-range planning to ensure that transportation projects receive funding and approvals. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Work with CVAG, WRCOG, Caltrans, transit operators, local agencies, and SCAG to coordinate project amendments to the 2012 RTP and/or 2013 FTIP. • Provide the Commissioners information to assist in advocating Commission projects. • Continue CETAP intra-county corridor work. • Continue working with the RCA to implement the MSHCP. • Maintain maximum flexibility in project selection for MAP-21 fund sources to serve the diverse needs of Riverside County. Continue to seek a stronger role for county transportation commissions in state and regional transportation and air quality programs in order to direct funding for programs and projects that will improve air quality and mobility in Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Support efforts to seek additional funding at the local, state, and federal levels for projects that improve air quality. • Support ongoing efforts to regulate federal emission sources. • Support efforts that allow more flexibility in funding transit operating and capital costs. Continue implementation of the CMP in cooperation with SCAG, WRCOG, CVAG, Caltrans, and local agencies and maintain federal certification for the CMP. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objectives: • Implement the CMP to meet federal CMS requirements cited under the metropolitan planning organization (i.e., SCAG) planning regulations. • Provide data collected on the CMP system to SCAG and Caltrans for reporting on the Highway Performance Monitoring System. • Provide data collected on the CMP system to local agencies and other interested parties. • Continue monitoring the CMP system to ensure the minimum adopted LOS threshold is met. Continue working with Caltrans to monitor traffic conditions for the purpose of focusing transportation funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies. (Policy Goal: System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Review Caltrans' Performance Monitoring System count data to infill segments that currently do not have Smart Call Boxes or loop detectors to monitor traffic. • Identify congested corridors for potential funding opportunities. Continue to advocate for jobs/housing balance and attracting high income jobs to Riverside County in addition to addressing intercounty congestion. (Policy Goal: Economic Development) Objectives: • Participate in ongoing studies and activities regarding the jobs/housing imbalance between Orange and Riverside counties and San Diego and Riverside counties. • Support the County interests pertaining to transportation planning as population, job, and housing forecasts are developed by SCAG and the State. Maintain Fundtrack project database to allow for efficient monitoring of projects and funding with the ability to share project information with local jurisdictions. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Maintain consultant contract to manage and host the Commission's web -based project management database. • Work with SCAG and other county transportation commissions to refine and maintain the SCAG regional database, including the coordination of the Commission's database with SCAG's FTIP database. • Coordinate with Caltrans to assure database compatibility and promote information sharing including timely reporting of fund obligation information. Ensure maximum funding and flexibility for projects funded with STIP-RIP, Proposition 1B, and federal MAP-21 funds. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Participate in statewide efforts to implement projects and fully utilize all available funds from Proposition 1B funding programs. • Work with Caltrans and the CTC to meet the intent of the Proposition 1B programs (including CMIA, TCIF, and SLPP) related to implementing projects within the timeframes specified in the baseline project agreements or programming application. • Advocate that regions that program local and federal funds to replace state funding due to the state budget shortfall (or limited allocation capacity) be given high priority for repayment when funds are available, or in future programming in the next STIP programming cycle. • Participate in various state and federal forums to increase funding levels, streamline programming processes, and provide flexibility in obligating funds. • Support efforts advocating the continuation and protection of state transportation funding and the payback of loans taken from state transportation accounts. • Advocate that RIP county share reserves receive priority programming over counties that advance shares. • Continue to strategically program and fund projects in an effort to obligate and/or allocate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding. • Participate in Southern California Programming Roundtable meetings to ensure that 100% of federal obligation authority (OA) for CMAQ and STP funding is obligated within the SCAG region. • Continue to monitor project implementation through the use of milestone reporting on a quarterly basis to maintain maximum funding levels for projects and prevent loss of funds to Riverside County. Provide support to the Commission's Capital Project Development and Delivery and Finance departments to maintain project funding and schedules and minimize programming issues. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Provide input to the budget development process. • Attend regular meetings with the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. • Serve in an oversight role regarding project invoicing and close-outs. • Prepare project agreement summaries. • Coordinate project RFA/OA packages. • Monitor progress of project milestones and RFAs as they are processed through Caltrans headquarters and FHWA. • Prepare CTC allocation requests, extensions, and amendments for STIP and Proposition 1B funded projects. Provide assistance to local agencies to facilitate and streamline project delivery. (Policy Goals: Mobility & Communications) Objectives: • Continue coordination of TAC meetings. • Provide information regarding project programming data, including funding status, to project sponsors on a quarterly basis. • Provide local agencies with recommendations on project programming to minimize unnecessary requirements and delays. • Upon request, attend local agency project delivery team meetings to provide advice on programming issues. • Meet regularly with Caltrans local assistance staff to monitor project submittals and resolve project implementation and obligation issues. • Assist local agencies in preparing RFAs, STIP submittals, and inactive reporting justifications. Continue to work with state and federal agencies to streamline processes for funding and project approvals. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship & Communications) Objectives: • Maintain relationships with key staff at regional, state and federal agencies. • Participate in SCAG's National Freight Gateway Collaboration to define a system that meets the region's long- term mobility, safety, environmental, and energy needs including developing a brand specific to goods movement projects in Southern California. • Identify problematic areas with project delivery and/or programming and work with federal lobbyists to develop solutions for streamlining and clarifying processes for the next federal transportation bill. • Participate in regional, state, and federal forums addressing issues related to project programming, implementation, and air quality conformity. Facilitate development of regional transportation solutions that benefit Riverside County, including implementation of Proposition 1B TCIF projects and the Commission's Grade Separation Plan. (Policy Goals: Goods Movement, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objective: • Monitor progress made in constructing the TCIF-funded projects through discussions with staff from partner agencies including Caltrans; cities of Banning, Coachella, Corona, and Riverside; and the County. Timely completion of the TCIF projects is required to demonstrate the region's ability to deliver projects consistent with the CTC's direction when the Proposition 1B funding was allocated. Determine where future efforts regarding addressing Riverside County goods movement issues would prove most effective. (Policy Goal: Goods Movement) Objectives: • Identify drivers of demand for goods movement services and performance of modal systems and services as well as public benefits, specific areas of inefficiency, and the impacts of goods movement on communities. • Implement the Commission's 2012 Grade Separation Funding Strategy through coordination of advocacy efforts with the Legislative Affairs and Communications Department. Facilitate public and private investments in clean air technology in support of the broader air quality programs for SCAG, SCAQMD, and Riverside County local entities. (Policy Goal: Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Monitor the impact of AB32 (greenhouse gas emission reduction) application to Commission transportation projects. • Monitor the impact of SB375 (greenhouse gas emission reduction) from light trucks and automobiles through the implementation of the 2012 RTP/SCS. • Actively participate on the MSRC's TAC to ensure equitable funding is available in support of capital projects within Riverside County. Planning and Programming Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Federal projects monitored for obligation authority delivery 61 19 17 25 TUMF Regional Arterial projects monitored 15 18 18 15 TUMF agreements/amendments 5 5 4 5 FTIP amended projects 287 285 200 225 STIP/Proposition 1B programming, allocations, amendments, and extensions for: Commission projects 2 7 7 3 Local agency projects 18 6 26 13 Rail Mission Statement: "To develop and support passenger rail transportation options for increased mobility within Riverside County and the region." Chart 30 — Rail Capital Outlay 0% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 4% Professional Costs 4% Support Costs 11% Rail expenditures of $15,485,600 include Metrolink operations and capital support as well as maintenance and operations of the five Commission -owned and operated commuter rail stations and the Perris Transit Center (Table 51). Salaries and benefits reflect a 28% increase and is a result of an increase in FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs, which include legal and consultant services, have increased 40% due to on -call rail consultants who will be used to perform service planning and modeling for rail projects including 91 line/Perris Valley Line expansion and Coachella Valley service. Support costs, which reflect a decrease of 1%, include station maintenance, media ads, printing services, and marketing incentives. Station maintenance includes property management, utilities, grounds maintenance, repairs, cleaning, and security services at the five Commission - owned commuter rail stations, adjacent parking structures, and the Perris Transit Center. Projects and operations expenditures of $12,489,200 increased 6% compared to the previous year's budget and include an operating contribution of up to $10,462,500 to SCRRA for Metrolink operations, which includes new service, and $250,000 to connect transit to Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and Corona Cruiser buses. The Commission's commuter rail program intends to utilize existing mechanisms within Metrolink to assess and monitor operations and budget performance. Program operations relate primarily to station operations. Table 51- Rail Expenditure Detail FY11/12 FY12,/13 FY12/13 FY13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Charge Salaries and Benefits $ 486700 $ 496700 $ 613,200 $ 636500 $ 139,8:0 28% Professional Casts Legal Services 158,100 123,000 103,900 102,033 (21,000) -17% Professional Services -General 47,900 atco0 153,030 486003 12a000 63% Total Professional Costs 206 C00 421,0:0 256900 5811003 167,000 40% Support Costs 1,2611100 1,735600 1,455,9:0 1,723,700 (11,9M) -1% Projects and Operations Program Operations 1,398,800 1,39000 1,30Q500 1,471700 76900 6% End need ng 39,500 39,500 5,030 (34,500) -87% Special Studies 21,700 19:4000 - 301000 150,000 100% Operating and Capital Cisburserrents 16836400 10,25Q000 7,241,900 1(17129:0 462500 5% Total Projects andCGperations 18,225,900 31,834,300 9,181,900 12,489,200 664,900 6% Capital Outlay 21,900 66730 56400 48,2C0 (17,500) -27% TC7TALRail M3intenanceand Operations $ 20202,6:0 $ 14,553,300 $ 11,564,303 $ 15,424600 $ 9373oe 6% Rail Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.01 0.12 Capital Projects Manager 0.35 0.40 Chief Financial Officer 0.06 0.04 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.00 0.00 Deputy Executive Director 0.02 0.00 Facilities Administrator 0.00 0.00 Multimodal Services Director 0.23 0.27 Procurement Analyst 0.17 0.30 Procurement Manager 0.29 0.12 Project Delivery Director 0.02 0.01 Rail Manager 1.00 1.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.01 0.01 Staff Analyst 1.03 1.04 0.07 0.35 0.07 0.04 0.00 0.55 0.10 0.32 0.30 0.05 1.00 0.00 1.10 FTE 3.19 3.31 3.95 Department Budget Overview -Rail Operations Department Description The Commission has directed efforts in the areas of regional commuter rail, intercity passenger rail, high speed rail, and capital improvements to support enhanced passenger and freight rail service. The entire program includes elements of planning, programming, commuter rail development and support, station and corridor management, mitigation of community and environmental impacts, legislative and regulatory advocacy, and construction of capital projects. Many elements are managed or supported by other Commission departments, legal counsel, and consultants. Departmental efforts contributing to the rail program are found throughout the budget document. Coordination and consultation also occur with a variety of public and private entities including the CTC, Caltrans, California Public Utilities Commission, California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), Federal Railroad Administration, FTA, Amtrak, environmental agencies, the University of California, transit providers, SCAG, WRCOG, CVAG, San Diego Association of Governments, LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency, local governments, private freight railroads, businesses, and property owners. The Commission participates in the ongoing funding and governance of Metrolink through SCRRA, a joint powers authority consisting of the county transportation commissions of Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura counties. The Commission holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven member board. Commission staff serves on the five -county TAC which negotiates service and funding levels, based upon the County's established priorities. The TAC provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and Commission departments, and linkages to local communities. Of the seven commuter rail lines operated by Metrolink, three routes consisting of the Riverside, Inland Empire - Orange County (IEOC), and 91 Lines directly serve Western County. Unlike the other SCRRA member agencies, the Commission owns and operates the commuter rail stations serving Riverside County: Riverside Downtown, Pedley, La Sierra, West Corona, and North Main Corona (Chart 31). The Commission is also the owner of and the operating partner with RTA at the Perris Transit Center, a multimodal transportation facility. Station operation and maintenance costs are included in the Rail Department budget with services currently coordinated by the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. New and ongoing construction projects at these stations are described in the capital budget managed by the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department. Chart 31— Riverside County Metrolink Station Locations Riverside County Metrolink Service MIRTH VAIN CORONA STATION 1 1 WEST CORONA STATION = PERIT ! SIAM RIVERSIDE - Li SIERRA STATION L, - I EXISTING STATIONS 0 PROPOSED STATIONS i- H-F FFFF METROUNN LINE ii+PH++,,,+ff PROPOSED PERRIS VALLEY LINE (: RIVERSIDE HUNTED PARK STATION RIIT PEE DOWNTOWN STATION W,IA� .in* DOWNTOWN PERRIS sTATION Mpi,Et,i: VALLEY PERRIS bra Y SOUTH PERRIS STATION;) 111611 r8r1 �• 1 fr. Key Assumptions • Metrolink's preliminary FY 2013/14 budget is adopted by the Commission and SCRRA. In the event that additional funds are needed during the budget year, a mid -year budget adjustment will be presented to the Commission for approval. • Ridership and fare revenues continue to grow slightly on the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 Lines (Chart 32). ■ The Commission manages the station security guard contract. Estimated costs are based on the actual contract terms with a portion reimbursed by SCRRA. Chart 32 — Metrolink Average Daily Ridership 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Accomplishments 2012 2013 2014 ■ 91 Line ■ IEOC ■ Riverside/LA • Added a fifth new peak period round-trip train on the IEOC service, which is the first added peak train in over a decade on this line. This provides greater options for daily commuters. • Actively participated on the LOSSAN board and supported efforts for local control for the Southern California intercity rail service. • Continued to implement the recommendations of the comprehensive safety and security assessment and emergency response plan at the Metrolink stations. • Successfully oversaw the new security guard contractor while implementing tougher standards and accountability in the security program. Significant improvements have been realized with more detailed and responsive reporting and monitoring of station facilities. • Supported the holiday toy train event at the La Sierra and North Main Corona rail stations. The community continues to support this event with strong local participation. This event also generates needed donations for the Spark of Love Toy Drive for local charities. Major Initiatives Over the last 20 years, more than $110 million in capital improvements have been made in developing stations and securing access to support the Commission's commuter rail services operations. The development of the Perris Valley Line project and its operational impacts will continue to be pursued and evaluated, respectively. The four Perris Valley Line stations (see Chart 31) are currently completely designed. In addition, continued efforts are underway to expand peak period rail service on the IEOC and 91 Lines to better meet the needs of Inland Empire commuters. Department Goals —Rail Operations Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving Riverside County. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Support improved Metrolink system safety and security initiatives. • Implement enhanced safety and security features at all stations. • Work with Metrolink staff to increase patronage on Riverside County lines. • Continue to expand service on Metrolink lines with increased train frequencies. • Coordinate with Metrolink staff to develop future service plans to best meet the needs of Riverside County residents. • Continue to monitor Metrolink's financial performance to ensure Riverside County transportation funds are used efficiently and responsibly. Maximize opportunities for public use of rail -related investment. (Policy Goal: Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Support transit operator efforts to expand availability and use of connecting transit in order to improve access and reduce demand on parking capacity; costs associated with transfers are currently reimbursed to the transit operators by the Commission and are budgeted. • Explore track rights opportunities. • Expand opportunities with the Commuter Assistance Program's park and ride operations for the designation of specific car/vanpool/buspool parking at commuter rail stations with available capacity. • Expand opportunities for interline travel through coordination of schedules with Amtrak intercity and long distance trains, such as the Sunset Limited, and other Metrolink lines, including encouraging joint ticketing options. Implement energy efficient systems and generate revenue to offset maintenance costs of rail properties. (Policy Goals: Environmental Stewardship, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Explore track rights opportunities and potential for joint development opportunities at stations. • Explore the installation of cell phone towers as a revenue source to offset operating costs. • Explore additional revenue potential at the rail stations. • Evaluate alternative and emergency power systems. Department Budget Overview — Rail Development In order to expand passenger rail options throughout the County, the Commission conducts feasibility studies to assess the viability of commuter rail expansion. In 2005, the Commission completed the commuter rail feasibility study that examined the viability of extending Metrolink commuter rail service largely within existing rail rights of way. The Commission approved the study and recommended advanced study of extensions on the SJBL to Hemet/San Jacinto and Murrieta/Temecula. The next phase of Alternatives Analysis for these corridors will be pursued in future years as funding availability allows. San Jacinto Branch Line The Commission holds title to and manages the 38-mile SJBL (Chart 33) and several adjacent properties, preserved for future passenger rail service. BNSF Railroad holds the freight rights in the corridor, providing service to local shippers, and performs maintenance on the line. Chart 33 — San Jacinto Branch Line k mow• SAM !ACM M CF !MARCH L iMM VORAn YAL[AY .mac- MlNp1S � SA AMID Perris Valley Line Small Starts Project In June 2000, the Commission allocated $20 million of Measure A funds for capital and operating expenditures related to the implementation of passenger rail service on the initial operating segment of the SJBL, known as the Perris Valley Line (see Chart 31). Project cost estimates have been revised and are now approximately $248 million. Staff is seeking a small starts grant agreement from the FTA Small Starts Program to fund $75 million of the project cost with the balance to be funded by other federal, state, and local funding sources, as illustrated in Table 52 and Chart 34. Since 2008, $75 million in Small Starts funding has been federally appropriated. Details on this capital project are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery section. Chart 34 — Perris Valley Line Funding Chart Mr;1:1; 1 it#. Table 52 — Perris Valley Line Funding Plan Total Federal: STP $ 500,000 FTA 5307 36,514,263 FTA 5309 Small Starts 75,000,000 CMAQ 26,157,453 State: STI P 52,978,000 Local: Measure A 57,100,869 Total Perris Valley Line Project Estimate $ 248,250,585 The project has received FTA approval to begin project development and advance preliminary engineering. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) draft environmental assessment was circulated for public review in 2004, and a new Supplemental Environmental Assessment was released in 2010 and again in 2012. The CEQA document was finalized in 2011, and final NEPA approval was obtained in May 2012. The FY 2013/14 budget in the Capital Project Development and Delivery section includes total expenditures of $147 million for the Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. The public outreach program for this project continues to be a priority with ongoing efforts to reach all the communities including residents, businesses, and schools along the corridor. Passenger Rail to the Pass Area and Coachella Valley In recent years the Commission has also focused attention on the creation of intercity passenger rail service between the Coachella Valley, the Pass Area, Riverside, and the Los Angeles basin through advocacy efforts with state, federal, and local government entities and negotiation with the freight railroads. The Commission's current efforts include ensuring the corridor is prominently featured in the updated California State Rail Plan and that a Service Development Plan is pursued. The Commission has worked closely with CVAG in recent years to update the feasibility studies to include current cost and travel time information. There has been enhanced coordination with CVAG, Amtrak, and the State on this project. High Speed Rail The Commission continues to play a proactive role in the development of a statewide, high speed passenger rail system, including routing of the backbone corridor through the Inland Empire with possible stations in the Riverside/Corona and Murrieta/Temecula areas. With the passage of Proposition 1A in November 2008, there is now a proposed funding mechanism to move the state high speed rail project forward. The CHSRA has begun work on a project level environmental assessment and corridor alignment study for the section between Los Angeles and San Diego via the Inland Empire. The Commission has directed the review to include an alignment alternative along 1-15 for analysis. The Commission has entered into a MOU to be supportive in the development of this high speed rail project and is participating in the Southern California Inland Corridor Group meetings. The Commission actively contributed to the development of the supplemental Alternatives Analysis released in spring 2012 and continues to coordinate local participation at Technical Working Group meetings attended by local stakeholders. Work on this effort has slowed down with the release of the latest business plan that extends the development of this Phase II section from Los Angeles to San Diego via the Inland Empire to beyond 2030. The Commission signed a MOU along with the other Southern California transportation entities and SCAG to commit $1 billion in unallocated Proposition lA funds for early investment to be spent locally for rail transportation improvement projects. Key Assumptions • Project development on the Perris Valley Line will continue in FY 2013/14. Accomplishments • Having received a medium -high rating from the FTA on the Perris Valley Line in December 2007, continued project development activities including progress on environmental documents and the related public reviews. The project is now complete with final design. • Worked with the on -call rail consultant bench to provide detailed schedules and models for proposed 91 and IEOC line service expansion proposals. Major Initiatives As discussed above, project development and right of way acquisition related to the Perris Valley Line project is expected to continue. Department Goals —Rail Development Identify and plan for capital improvements necessary to increase the scope, appeal, and reliability of commuter rail operations. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue efforts to fully fund the Perris Valley Line. • Finalize the station design elements for the Perris Valley Line. • Continue to review parking requirements and develop plans to address projected parking deficiencies. Maintain efforts with local agencies, other Southern California counties, and the state and federal governments to expand intercity passenger rail service into Riverside County and the Coachella Valley. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Continue to support and influence state efforts in the creation of a high speed passenger rail system along an Inland Empire alignment through coordination with state and local agencies. In addition, continue to identify and advocate for high speed rail funding to be spent on beneficial local rail projects in Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Rail Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated Average daily ridership on existing commuter lines • Riverside Line • IEOC Line • 91 Line 5,279 4,142 2,254 FY 11/12 Actual 5,205 3,825 2,265 FY 12/13 Estimated 5,456 4,073 2,465 FY 13/14 Projected 5,070 4,397 2,503 Farebox recovery ratio • Riverside Line • IEOC Line • 91 Line 58.5% 31.3% 49.7% 60.6% 32.1% 53.4% 60.9% 37.2% 48.5% 58.6% 36.5% 45.2% Public and Specialized Transit Mission Statement: "To coordinate the operation of all public transportation services within the County with a goal toward promoting compliance and improving mobility as well as program efficiency and effectiveness between transit operators. To maintain and improve, as resources allow, mobility options for seniors, persons with disabilities, and persons of limited means to enhance quality of life through innovative solutions and better coordination of existing services." Chart 35 — Public and Specialized Transit Salaries and Benefits Transfers Out 10 12% _ Expenditures Public and specialized transit uses are budgeted at $120,770,000 for FY 2013/14, as presented in Table 53, and consist primarily of capital projects and operations costs as well as transfers out to Commission funds for administration, planning, and rail purposes. Salaries and benefits reflect a 17% increase as a result of an increase in FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. LTF disbursements consist of transit operating and capital allocations to public transit operators of $67,439,000, bicycle and pedestrian facilities allocations to cities and the County of $1,280,000, and planning and administration allocations to other agencies of $555,800. STA disbursements of $25,602,000 are for bus capital purposes in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. Transfers out comprise $8,391,100 for rail operations and capital, $2,600,000 for grade separation projects, $2,175,000 for planning, and $800,000 for administration. The LTF transit allocations reflect the use of $10,276,400 in fund balances. Measure A disbursements include $2,725,400 for Western County specialized transit funding of the first year of the 2013 two-year call for projects. The majority of other Measure A disbursements relate to 2013 Measure A public transit programs: $722,600 for Western County Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) allocations, $5,500,000 for Coachella Valley public and specialized transit, and $2,386,000 for Western County intercity bus services. The Western County allocations are disbursed monthly to RTA, the major transit provider in the Western County, while the Coachella Valley allocation is disbursed monthly to SunLine, the major transit provider in the Coachella Valley. Table 53 — Public and Specialized Transit Expenditure Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 326,600 $ 326,200 $ 296,100 $ 380,100 $ 53,900 17% Professional Costs Legal Services 8,400 28,500 21,600 23,500 (5,000) -18% Audit Services 100,000 98,000 (100,000) -100% Professional Services - General 137,700 163,000 155,000 165,000 2,000 1% Total Professional Costs 146,100 291,500 274,600 188,500 (103,000) -35% Support Costs 8,400 18,900 13,500 24,500 5,600 30% Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements 52,677,000 84,174,600 58,822,300 106,210,800 22,036,200 26% Total Projects and Operations 52,677,000 84,174,600 58,822,300 106,210,800 22,036,200 26% Transfers Out 14,910.500 19.632.600 18.336.400 13.966.100 (5,666,500) -29% TOTAL Public and Specialized Transit $ 68,068,600 $ 104,443,M $ 77,742,900 $ 120,770,000 $ 16,326,200 16% Public and Specialized Transit Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.09 0.10 Chief Financial Officer 0.10 0.08 Executive Director 0.03 0.01 Multimodal Services Director 0.27 0.20 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.00 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.00 Staff Analyst 1.00 1.00 Transit Manager 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.20 0.03 0.02 1.00 1.00 FTE 2.49 2.39 2.45 Department Budget Overview Department Description The Measure A specialized transit program provides a valuable service to the community by serving the needs of commuters, mainly seniors and persons with disabilities, whose transportation needs are not met by traditional services. Specialized transit operations are typically managed by social service and nonprofit agencies. The Commission also allocates funding, following a competitive call for projects, through the FTA Section 5310 program that is administered by Caltrans. This program provides funding to nonprofit transportation and social service agencies and public operators under special circumstances for the purchase of capital equipment. With the passage of SAFETEA-LU and subsequent inclusion also in MAP-21, the following are two relatively new federal funding sources for specialized transit services: • JARC (Section 5316) program provides funding for the development and maintenance of jobs access projects to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from work during non - peak hours as well as provide reverse commute options for workers in suburban areas. • New Freedom (Section 5317) program provides funding for new public transportation services and alternatives for people with disabilities beyond the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. Eligibility for the above federal funds requires recipients to comply with all federal coordinated planning requirements in accordance with SAFETEA-LU and MAP-21 provisions. Projects selected for funding under these programs must be derived from a locally -developed Coordinated Plan and must be developed through a process that includes representatives of the public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human service providers. The update of the Coordinated Plan was completed in April 2012, and the third Universal Call for Projects was issued in November 2012. Approval of Measure A and JARC/New Freedom grant awards under the 2013 Universal Call for Projects was obtained in April 2013 for the Western County and Coachella Valley applicants, and approved projects will begin provision of services on July 1, 2013. The Commission is responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming. Planning includes the development of the countywide SRTPs for eight public transit operators consisting of the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; SCRRA's Metrolink commuter rail; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency; RTA; and SunLine. The Commission assists in coordinating the annual development, review, and approval of the operator SRTPs and allocates Measure A, LTF, STA, and FTA Sections 5307, 5309, 5311, 5316, and 5317 transit funding resources to public transit programs. The Commission is responsible for the disbursement of Measure A, LTF, and STA funds, while federal transit funds are administered by the FTA. In partnership with the County's transit operators, the Commission coordinates the allocation of available Proposition 1B transit (capital and security) funding and ensures that proposed projects meet the mobility needs of the County. Proposition 1B funds are annually appropriated by the legislature and used for transit related capital purchases, infrastructure/facility improvements, and security enhancements. The Riverside County operators annually apply for Proposition 1B funds; however, due to the state's ongoing financial condition, the release of funds is contingent upon available proceeds from future bond sales. The Commission has public transit operator oversight and fiduciary responsibilities to ensure that annual fiscal audits and a state triennial performance audit are conducted in accordance with TDA regulations. The Commission is also charged with annually reviewing public transit operator activities and recommending potential productivity improvements to lower operating costs. To ensure that specialized transit allocations are expended and required service goals are met in accordance with funding agreements, the Commission engages an audit firm to perform certain agreed -upon procedures for the Measure A specialized transit funding recipients, some of which also receive Section 5310, JARC and New Freedom funds. Key Assumptions • LTF, STA, and Measure A disbursements are based on projected budgetary allocations but may be adjusted after the Commission approves actual allocations in July 2013. • Fluctuating of LTF and Measure A sales tax revenues will continue to require efforts to streamline operating expenses by all operators while maintaining efficiency and quality of service. • Transit Vision, adopted by the Commission in June 2008, established a 25% allocation of 2009 Measure A Western County specialized transit funds to the RTA as the CTSA for Western County. Accomplishments • Oversaw the successful second -year implementation of the ongoing specialized transit services resulting from the 2011 Universal Call for Projects funding allocation process. • Received approval notification of 20 capital projects awarded to five successful Riverside County recipients of funding under the FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/11 FTA Section 5310 program. Projects were derived from a locally -developed Coordinated Plan. • Incorporated FY 2010/11 Proposition 1B Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) funds with trarisit capital funding sources following Caltrans' release of program funding covering a three-year period need for fiscal years 2010/11— 2012/13. • Approved allocation of FY 2012/13 Proposition 1B California Transit Security Grant Program —California Transit Assistance Funds for eligible transit safety and security projects identified by transit operators following release of program funding and guidelines by the California Emergency Management Agency. • Contracted an outside auditor to conduct the triennial performance audits of the Commission and the seven transit operators in Riverside County that receive TDA funds. • Issued the 2013 Call for Projects funding allocations for specialized transit services for FY 2013/14 and FY 2014/15 and awarded grants. Major Initiatives The Commission has long demonstrated a strong commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its 1989 Measure A specialized transit program, the Commission provided millions of dollars to public and nonprofit transit operators for the provision of special transit services to improve the mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities. Along with support of traditional dial -a -ride services, the Commission supports innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders having very special transit needs. The riders, many frail and elderly, have come to depend on these services that provide a higher level of assistance than can be provided by the public transit providers and/or operate in areas not served by public transit. As a result of the 2009 Measure A, these specialized transit programs will continue through 2039. In June 2013, 17 programs in Western County and four programs in the Coachella Valley will complete their second year of specialized transit services under the 2011 Universal Call for Projects, including the non -emergency medical transportation component. In April 2013, 17 programs in Western County and five programs in the Coachella Valley were awarded grants under the 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Thirteen of these projects are fully funded with Measure A funds, while the other nine projects will be funded by a mix of Measure A, JARC, and New Freedom funds. As identified in the Coordinated Plan, the specialized transit projects approved for funding will require implementation and yearlong performance monitoring during FY 2013/14 and FY 2014/15. To maintain funding stability of Measure A, LTF and STA funding from the state, staff will continue monitoring long- range planning activities to ensure that both anticipated revenues and on -hand reserves are properly utilized and in line with projected levels of service by the public operators. Staff will also work with the operators to plan and coordinate major capital purchases and investments into new rolling stock and other system improvements in order to maintain a viable on -hand reserve. Department Goals Provide timely information to the public regarding Commission -implemented projects and support public relations activities of Measure A, JARC, and New Freedom funded programs by grant recipients. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Complete contract agreement execution processes and start implementation of projects awarded under the 2013 Universal Call for Projects beginning July 1, 2013. • Produce and distribute public information materials as needed including press releases, flyers, brochures, marketing materials, and newspaper ads. In addition, staff will also leverage the 1E511 traveler information system in order to more fully market the availability of specialized transit programs. Allocate Measure A Specialized Transit and federal funds to support services that will maintain and/or enhance mobility by alleviating transportation barriers for seniors, persons with disabilities, and the truly needy. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Monitor performance of specialized transit grant recipients through analysis of their monthly performance reports. • Support the FTA Section 5310, 5316 and 5317 grant processes to improve mobility for seniors, persons with disabilities and individuals of limited means by working with Caltrans, public operators, and social service agencies to ensure a competitive process statewide for the allocation of federal transportation dollars for social service programs. • Provide technical assistance and program support to agencies offering specialized transit programs to ensure the maximum benefit of funding for improved mobility for seniors, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited means. • Seek Commission approval on funding allocations for the Universal Call for Projects every two years. Coordinate the operation of all public transportation services within the County with a goal toward promoting program efficiency and harmony between transit operators as outlined in state law. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Review transit planning, resource allocation, and service implementation policy requirements including appropriate coordination of commuter rail, intercounty and intercity bus, local bus and paratransit, and social service transportation services to ensure convenient service for passengers. • Implement recommendations resulting from the TDA-mandated triennial performance audits of the Commission and the seven Riverside County transit operators. • Assure the ongoing effectiveness of the SRTP process and work with the County's eight transit operators to assure productivity and efficiency as well as compliance with the productivity improvement program. • Coordinate regional transit connections among commuter rail, buses, and paratransit services to ensure convenient service for passengers. • Monitor transit operators' quarterly capital grants reports. • Monitor transit operators' performance through analysis of their quarterly performance reports using the TransTrack computer -based tracking program. Continue to provide staff resources to assist and support the coordination of transit services within the County and throughout the State. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Communications) Objectives: • Participate and influence intercounty discussions between Riverside, Orange, and San Diego counties regarding the enhancement of intermodal options. This includes additional transit services (rail and express bus) and rideshare services. • Regularly participate in meetings that focus on the coordination of transit services, such as the California Association for Coordinated Transportation, SunLine's Access Committee, RTA's ADA Committee, the Riverside County Foundation on Aging Board of Directors, the Older Californian Traffic Safety Task Force, and the Commission's Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service Transportation Advisory Council. • Continue the development of a marketing and distribution network for communicating specialized transit mobility options to seniors, the disabled, and persons of limited means. Public and Specialized Transit Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected SRTPs submitted by operators and reviewed 8 8 8 8 SRTP amendments 3 3 3 3 Specialized Transit grants awarded 21 21 21 24 One-way trips provided by Measure A funded projects 150,000 150,900 152,000 155,000 One-way trips provided by JARC & New Freedom funded agencies 250,000 196,000 171,000 175,000 One-way trips reimbursed through the Western County Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project 75,000 82,383 83,700 84,000 Transit tickets provided through the Transportation Access Program 64,976 65,263 64,500 65,000 Clients served through Blindness Support Services 42 36 30 30 Commuter Assistance Mission Statement: "To encourage and promote transportation alternatives for commuters through employer partnerships, information services, technological innovation, and community outreach." Chart 36 — Commuter Assistance TFansfers Out Salaries and 2%, Benefits 7Y, Expenditures Commuter Assistance expenditures and transfers out total $4,523,900, which represents an 8% increase from last year's budget (Table 54). Salaries and benefits of $300,800 reflect a 37% increase due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $817,800 have increased 26% over the prior year due to the enhancements on the regional ridematching database. Support costs totaling $483,300 include mail and printing services, computer and vehicle maintenance, communications, and other office expenditures. Projects and operations expenditures of $2,802,800 consist of park and ride lease payments of $150,000, regional transportation consultant services totaling $1,880,500 to manage and implement the program, and merchant vouchers valued at $772,300. Capital outlay expenditures include $7,000 to upgrade the hardware and network to enhance the equipment in the commuter exchange vehicle and to purchase equipment for local back up of the regional ridematching database. Reimbursements from local county transportation commissions for regional rideshare services provided by the Commission are included in revenues to offset these expenditures. Transfers out consist of $112,200 to the General fund for costs related to maintenance of the park and ride facility at the Perris Transit Center. Table 54 -Commuter Assistance Uses Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 216,030 $ 218,900 $ 375,200 $ 301800 $ 81,930 37% Professional Costs Legal Services 3Z500 25,000 25,000 25,003 0% Professional Services - General 555,500 625,300 729,800 792.800 167.500 27% Total Professional Costs 588,000 650,300 754,800 817,803 167,500 26'A Support Costs 366,903 529,200 469,103 423,300 (45,900) -9% Projects and Operations Program Operations 1,986,700 Z623,400 Z589.303 Z802,800 179,400 7i;, Total Projects and Operations 1,986,700 Z623,400 2,588,300 2,802,800 179,403 7% Capital Outlay 17,000 10,000 7,000 (10,000) -59% Transfers Out 1E0,000 151,300 151,300 112,200 (39100) -26% TOTAL Commuter Assistance $ 3,317,600 $ 4.190,100 $ 4,348,700 $ 4523,900 $ 333,E00 8% Commuter Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.11 0.15 Chief Financial Officer 0.01 0.01 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.58 0.58 Deputy Executive Director 0.01 0.00 Multimodal Services Director 0.27 0.27 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.01 Procurement Manager 0.01 0.04 Staff Analyst 0.60 0.55 0.20 0.01 0.54 0.04 0.47 0.02 0.02 0.54 FTE 1.59 1.61 1.84 Department Budget Overview Department Description While much of the Commission's work is focused on increasing transportation infrastructure and capacity, there is significant value in ensuring that the transportation systems are used efficiently. To help foster more efficient use of these systems, the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program seeks to encourage Riverside County constituents and commuters to make a mode -shift decision away from single occupancy vehicle commuting and into alternative modes of transportation such as a carpool, vanpool, buspool, public bus, Metrolink, walking, bicycling, or telecommuting. The Commuter Assistance Program seeks to efficiently influence driver behavior by fostering a mode -shifting decision at both the employer and commuter levels via the following methods: • The provision of employer services to foster the implementation of employer -based mode -shift and rideshare programs; • The use of incentives both for beginning and then maintaining a mode-shift/rideshare arrangement; • Public information services including the dissemination of personalized commute options and traveler information to educate commuters of all travel options available and to foster congestion avoidance behavior when traveling; and • Leverage technology to deliver easy to use online resources and tools to more efficiently serve employer partners, their employees, and all other commuters. The Commission's Commuter Assistance Program was implemented as a specific requirement under Measure A to address congestion mitigation. While ridesharing has a beneficial impact on air quality, first and foremost, it is a strategy to improve mobility through increased use of alternative travel modes. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue to contract with a consulting firm to administer the Commuter Assistance Program. • Maintaining its long-term partnership with the Commission, SANBAG will contract with the Commission to manage and implement a "sister" Commuter Assistance Program for its residents and employers in San Bernardino County. • At the regional level, four -county transportation commissions' (Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Ventura) will contract with the Commission for the provision of regional ridematching database operations. Accomplishments • Developed a new and more cost effective ridematching system with new features that will launch in FY 2013/14. In addition, the new hosted ridematching system will no longer require hardware or a network administrator to maintain it. • Continued to operate the report card program for both program participants and employer partners which translates individual or worksite rideshare participation into money saved, congestion reduced, and emissions reduced. This outreach is intended to recognize rideshare efforts and to motivate participants to continue ridesharing and/or grow employer program participation. • Increased participation and use of on-line services by employer partners. • Continued to operate, maintain, and enhance the regional ridematching system on behalf of the five -county region. • Continued use of the Program Measurement Tool to evaluate program performance. • Continued to provide rideshare services to employers and commuters in the Coachella Valley, leveraging JARC funds. • Renewed leases for park and ride facilities with the following locations: Canyon Community Church of the Nazarene (Corona), Living Truth Christian Fellowship (Corona), Corona Friends Church (Corona), Elsinore Naval Military School (Lake Elsinore), Lake Elsinore Outlets (Lake Elsinore), Revival Christian Fellowship (Menifee), Mount San Jacinto College (San Jacinto), Hope Lutheran Church (Temecula), Orchard Christian Fellowship (Temecula), and the United Methodist Church (Temecula). • Continued partnering with the Rail Department to provide a permitted section of park and ride spaces in the city of Corona at the North Main Corona station. Major Initiatives A cornerstone of the Commuter Assistance Program is its continued partnership among commuters, employers, and government. The partnership, based on voluntary efforts, makes a collective difference in increasing the efficiency of the County's transportation system —local roads, freeways, commuter rail, and public bus. The combined effort results in less congestion, decreased vehicle miles traveled, and improved air quality. The major initiatives to continue these partnerships and efforts in FY 2013/14 are described below. Grow Employer Partnerships: Given that the highest percentage of rideshare arrangements is formed at work sites, voluntary employer participation is critical to address congestion and air quality goals; employers are the conduit to directly influence their employees' personal transportation choices. The ongoing success of the core Western County rideshare program and the explosive success of the now six -year old Coachella Valley rideshare program demonstration is a testament to the significance of employer partnerships in the program's success. However, the current economic environment will pose challenges in terms of maintaining and/or growing these partnerships. Employer Transportation Coordinators (ETCs) have to do more with less. Delivery of value-added services and tools to make the ETC's job easier will be a critical motivation to continue the partnership. Roll Out New Program Tools: The Commission is continuously looking for opportunities to enhance the suite of services and outreach to both the program participants and employer partners to improve participation, partnerships, and program efficiencies. Commuter Assistance will launch its new ridematching software in FY 2013/14. As part of this effort, the program will feature brand new services, including state-of-the-art trip planning, individual user profiles, and a customizable employer portal for ETCs to more effectively manage their company's rideshare programs. Support Multimodal Travel: In addition to ridematching, information services, and incentives to facilitate ridesharing, the Commuter Assistance Program also implements park and ride facilities to support ridesharing efforts. The last Caltrans park and ride facility in Riverside County was built in 1999. The Commission leases park and ride spaces from property owners to supplement the network of park and ride spaces in Riverside County. A continued focus for FY 2013/14 will be to monitor and optimize the number of spaces leased and coordinate with ridesharers and transit and rail partners to identify areas where the lease program can help support car/vanpool/buspool arrangements as well as facilitate transit connections. Department Goals Operate a cost-effective Commuter Assistance Program within Riverside County that results in a demonstrable reduction in single occupant vehicle trips, thus assisting with congestion mitigation and improving air quality. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Continue to offer short-term incentives for commuters to try a transportation mode other than driving alone. • Continue to provide a rewards program for long-term ridesharers to encourage their continued use of alternative modes of transportation. • Ensure the effectiveness of the Commuter Assistance Program through program analysis and recurring assessments of participation and retention of ridesharers. The Commission will continue to look for ways to pare program costs without impacting service delivery or participation. • Explore opportunities to further enhance the 511 mobile application by integrating incentive enrollment and/or tracking. • Extend the mode-shift/rideshare incentive and services to the Coachella Valley using awarded JARC funds. • Increase participation and use of on-line service by employer partners to reduce administrative costs. • Optimize the number of park and ride spaces leased and address park and ride gaps in the system. • Assess vanpool program funding opportunities. Ensure the coordination of ridesharing programs throughout the Inland Empire and the southern California region. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue to administer a "sister" Commuter Assistance Program in San Bernardino County on a contract basis, thus expanding the reach and effectiveness of commuter programs throughout the Inland Empire area. • Continue to provide leadership with regard to the ongoing operation, maintenance, and enhancement of both the regional ridematching database and network. • Fund and participate in regional rideshare marketing programs to enhance awareness of and encourage participation in commute modes that provide an alternative to driving alone. • Coordinate with regional partners with respect to the implementation of ridematching alternatives. • Investigate the modification of the regional vanpool agreement with the regional partners in order to provide for more service availability and a revision to the current cost sharing formula. • Implement the revised Guaranteed Ride Home model that is more suitable to the region's interests. Strategically broaden the reach of the program to encourage the use of alternative transportation modes amongst all travelers and continue to grow the core target base of employers and their employees. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Communications) Objectives: • Develop and implement a rideshare brand strategy and streamlined communications plan anchored by the 1E511 system. • Develop and support on-line resources and tools for employers to more effectively manage and market their organizations' rideshare programs. • Continue the dissemination of the report card program for both program participants and employer partners that translate individual or worksite rideshare participation into money saved, congestion reduced, and emissions reduced. • Publicize the participation of local employers in the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program through various media options. • Continue the operation of the Commuter Exchange vehicle to include 50 site visits for the FY 2013/14. • In partnership with the four -county transportation commissions and others, utilize the regional ridesharing database and website, www.ridematch.info. Commuter Assistance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Number of one-way single occupant vehicle trips reduced as a result of Rideshare Incentives 93,888 112,814 118,500 124,425 Number of Rideshare Plus Rewards Members 6,890 4,848 5,100 5,355 Number of incoming 1-866-RIDESHARE telephone calls 1,294 1,531 1,600 1,680 Number of services provided by Inland Empire Commuter Services to support employer trip reduction efforts at worksites: • Employer's requesting survey services 153 106 110 115 • RideGuides produced 29,564 15,628 16,400 17,220 Number of events participated in by the Commuter Exchange in total and as identified individually below: • Public events 2 10 5 5 • Employer work sites 3 3 5 5 • Elementary schools 45 39 40 40 Motorist Assistance Mission Statement: "To improve safety, reduce congestion, and enhance access to traveler information for motorists through the provision of a comprehensive motorist aid system." Chart 37 — Motorist Assistance t Expenditures Professional Costs j 11% i Salaries and Benefits 3% Projests and Operations 54% Motorist Assistance expenditures and uses are budgeted at $6,755,500 for FY 2013/14, or an increase of 10% compared to the prior year budget (Table 55) due to increased demand for FSP services supporting construction projects. Salaries and benefits reflect an increase of 6% due to market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $766,500 increased 7% due to enhancements to the 1E511 traveler information service. Support costs of $875,900 decreased $8,700, or 1%, primarily due to the FSP communication costs. Reimbursement from SANBAG for half of all 1E511 related expenditures is included in revenues. Budgeted expenditures for project operations include $3,300,000 in towing contract costs for the FSP program. Projects and operations costs have increased 18% due to increased towing for FSP construction services projects. Transfers out represent SAFE's matching funds of $916,400 to state funding for FSP services and a $374,500 allocation for administrative costs. Table 55 — Motorist Assistance Uses Detail FY111/12 FY12/13 FY12/13 FY11/14 Ibila. Peru Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 141203 $ 175933 $ 175900 $ 387,200 $ 11,300 6% Professional Casts Legzi Services 41803 31000 23,000 21000 (1,003) -3% Professional Services -General 74$800 637,50J 711503 737,500 KUM 7% Total Professional Costs 781600 717,500 735503 755500 43,000 Ta &wort Costs 515,400 884,60D 891200 Fv5903 ($7W) Ay. Projects and Cperations PrograrnCverations 2392100 3,0111COD 2,995,C00 1115,000 (25,000 21% Construction 61:1000 (0a0001 A % Total Projects and Operations 2392100 101g000 2934Ooo W5)003 565,030 183/0 TratsfersOut 1,034em 1,321,300 1,321,303 12919:0 (324201 -N TOTAL MttoiistAssistaice $ 4,942,9C0 $ 61033oo $ 401a900 $ 6755500 $ 5862([] lux, Motorist Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.04 0.03 Chief Financial Officer 0.01 0.01 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.42 0.42 Multimodal Services Director 0.23 0.26 Procurement Analyst 0.17 0.06 Procurement Manager 0.04 0.09 Staff Analyst 0.33 0.32 0.04 0.01 0.42 0.23 0.10 0.04 0.32 FTE 1.24 1.19 1.16 Department Budget Overview Department Description As a SAFE, the Commission is responsible for providing a motorist aid system for Riverside County. This system is comprised of three components: 1) call boxes, 2) FSP, and 3) the 1E511 traveler information system. The call box system allows motorists to call for assistance in the event of a mechanical breakdown, accident, or other emergency on the freeway. The FSP clears small debris on freeways and assists stranded motorists on the most congested Riverside County freeways by towing, changing flat tires, and temporarily taping cooling system hoses at no charge to the motorists. F513 service is also provided in construction zones through separate funding agreements with Caltrans to help mitigate congestion. The 1E511 system is a telephone and web -based service that delivers real-time traffic information, including incidents and travel times, bus and rail trip planning, and rideshare information. Key Assumptions • Annual maintenance costs are based on a flat -fee contract based on the number of call boxes. • Current percentage levels of vandalism, knockdowns, and miscellaneous repairs to call boxes will remain consistent with the past year. • The FSP will continue as long as state funding support is available. • Tow truck contractor costs for the nine existing FSP beats are based on Commission -approved contracts. • In partnership with SANBAG, the Commission will maintain and operate the 1E511 system in accordance with national 511 implementation standards. • The Commission will maintain and operate an 1E511 system to be funded 50% by the Commission and 50% by SANBAG. The Commission's share of operating costs will be funded with SAFE revenues. • The Commission will enhance 1E511 with the roll -out of a more personalized traffic information service. Accomplishments • Grew the IE511.org web visits per month by 40% in FY 2012/13. • Enhanced the 1E511 system with a new interactive voice recognition platform, manual flood gating capabilities for major incidents, and improved functionality and global positioning system capabilities for the 1E511 mobile application. • Incorporated the new 1-10 to state line detection and CMS signs into the traveler information system. • Performed a comprehensive assessment that identified additional call box reduction opportunities to improve program efficiencies and maintain an effective "safety -net" for stranded motorists. • Continued the "cost recovery" program for call box knockdowns in an effort to collect reimbursements from motorists involved in accidents that damage Commission property. • Achieved one of the highest benefit -to -cost ratios statewide for FSP in the latest statewide FSP Management Information System Report. • Performed an assessment of current FSP coverage and identified opportunities to further optimize the benefit: costs realized and assessed the feasibility of program expansion. • Implemented a new digital radio system for FSP that addresses coverage gaps, significantly improves reception, and complies with the Federal Communication Commission's narrowband radio conversion regulation. Major Initiatives Major Motorist Assistance initiatives will focus on system efficiencies and evaluating and/or implementing enhanced program services or coverage. The call box system program has served as a "safety -net" for stranded motorists in Riverside County since 1991. However, call box usage has declined over the years with the proliferation of mobile phone use. In response, call box reductions have been made, and, upon award of a new call box maintenance contractor, additional reductions will be made based on call box removals identified in the call box reduction planning assessment. In addition, staff will focus on maintaining a high benefit -to -cost ratio and seek opportunities to maximize funding to not only improve the level of service but to potentially expand FSP coverage as well. The Commission, along with its partner, SANBAG, will continue to operate and maintain the 1E511 system. This system includes a website interface and an interactive voice response (IVR) telephone system that serves Riverside and San Bernardino county residents and commuters. While several enhancements have been made to the system since its launch, new enhancements will focus on the development of serving more personalized traffic information services specific to a commuter's location, route, and time of travel. Department Goals Provide efficient delivery of a comprehensive motorist aid system (Call Box, FSP, 1E511) and an outstanding level of service to the traveling public. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Work in coordination with CHP and Ca!trans to implement call box reductions identified in the planning assessment. • Along with San Bernardino County SAFE, continue to monitor the operation of the call answering center contractor. • Research new technologies to streamline FSP processes and develop new tools to automate the production of reports that track the performance of FSP tow operators. • Continue to evaluate opportunities to provide more efficient FSP coverage through changes in service days, service hours, or number of vehicles assigned to each beat; perform budget assessments to identify potential service expansion (i.e., holiday service, weekend service on select beats) opportunities that can be supported. • Review proposed construction projects with Caltrans and local cities and coordinate the use of temporary tow service to mitigate congestion. Enhance access to real-time traveler information. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Communications) Objectives: • Develop access to, or delivery of, more personalized traffic information services specific to a commuter's location, route, and time of travel. • Grow the number of users with more personalized offerings, services, and cost-effective marketing efforts. • Continue to refine and enhance 1E511 web content, applications, and outreach. • Continue to leverage existing resources, such as traffic data, provided by Caltrans District 8, existing IVR software, and Google Transit to minimize costs. • Coordinate with Caltrans on expanding traffic detection and feeding that traffic data into the 1E511 system. • Utilize the opportunity at the new Caltrans District 8 Traffic Management Center to enhance coordination between CHP and Caltrans on traveler information. Motorist Assistance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Number of call boxes 611 608 603 550 Number of call box calls 5,094 5,043 4,791 4,551 Number of vehicle assists 47,123 42,748 44,885 47,129 Number of 1E511 phone calls 503,707 362,957 344,809 327,569 Number of 1E511 web visits 251,605 341,716 358,802 376,742 iiii1111 Mon t Riverside County Transportation Commission ttiit u t lb 1 [N]qt Capital Project Development and Delivery Mission Statement: "To keep the Commission's contract with the voters of Riverside County by accelerating the planning, programming, and implementation of projects and programs in the Measure A Transportation Improvement Plan, as enhanced by the Toll Program, to the extent that funds are available. To ensure that capital projects are environmentally acceptable, expertly designed, and implemented in a cost effective manner. To acquire and manage required right of way in the most economical, efficient, and timely manner." Chart 38 — Capital Project Development and Delivery Salaries and Benefits 096_ Debt Service 9% Expenditures Professional Costs 1% The budgeted expenditures and transfers out total $1,502,513,600 to cover all of the Commission's major capital projects (Table 56). Personnel costs represent less than 1% of the budgeted uses. Salaries and benefits reflect an increase of 7% due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $19,260,400 are primarily related to general legal costs, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the toll program, debt management services, and BNSF services related to a rail capital project. Support costs of $907,300 consist primarily of services needed to maintain the Commission's real properties in a condition that complies with all local codes and regulations governing property maintenance. General project costs include $12,197,600 related to program management provided by Bechtel Infrastructure (Bechtel), SCRRA, and permits for highway and rail capital projects. Significant projects included in engineering expenditures of $20,355,000, are the SR-91, 1-15, and 1-215 corridor improvements; 91/71 interchange improvement project; Mid County Parkway; 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector; SR-91 HOV lanes; various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment; and commuter rail CCTV operations center. Construction expenditures of $240,968,400, are primarily related to the 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment) SR-91 corridor improvement; SR-74 curve widening; I-15/Los Alamos Road bridge replacement; I-215/Blaine to Martin Luther King widening; 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector; 74/215 interchange; SR-91/La Sierra interchange; SR-91/HOV lanes Mary Street to 7th Street; various Western County Measure A and TUMF regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment; and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. Design -build costs of $217,750,000 pertain to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Approximately 14% of the projects and operations costs represent right of way expenditures of $164,707,800 on significant projects including the SR-91 corridor improvement project; SR-91 HOV lanes; 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment); 91/71 interchange improvements; SR-74 curve widening; Mid County Parkway; 74/215 interchange; 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector; various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects; and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. Funding will also be provided for MSHCP land mitigation acquisitions. Local turnback payments to jurisdictions and the County for local streets and roads repair, maintenance, and construction amount to $43,825,900, net of an allocation of $659,100 to the 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial special revenue fund related to the ineligibility of the city of Beaumont for its local streets and roads allocation. Disbursements to CVAG for the 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial program comprise substantially all of the regional arterial expenditures. Special studies of $25,000 are related to the SJBL. Operating and capital disbursements of $2,000,000 are related to Metrolink station rehabilitation costs. Rail capital equipment purchases for the station security project represent 71% of the capital outlay expenditures. Interest payments on outstanding commercial paper and the 2009 Bonds, 2010 Bonds, 2013 Bonds, and the Toll Bonds are approximately $41,112,300. Principal payments of $7,100,000 are related to the 2009 sales tax revenue bonds, and $80,000,000 to retire commercial paper notes. Cost of issuance expenditures of $7,500,000 are related to the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and 2013 Toll Bonds. Significant transfers out consist of the following: • $342,227,600 in commercial paper, sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds to fund 2009 Measure A Western County highway projects such as the SR-91 and 1-15 corridor improvements, 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment) project, and the 91/71 interchange project; • $15,319,500 from the TUMF CETAP reserves for two city of Temecula regional arterial projects along 1-15 and the 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment) project; • $11,000,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County highway funds to the Debt Service fund; • $10,000,000 from 1989 Measure A excess debt service reserves for a rail project; • $693,800 from TUMF for administrative allocations to the General fund; • $659,100 from 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads to the 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial program for the city of Beaumont's local streets and roads allocation; • $17,000,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial reserves to TUMF regional arterial projects for the cities of Corona, Moreno Valley, and San Jacinto, and the County; • $33,600 for construction FSP service related to the 1-215 corridor improvement (central segment) project; • $1,000,000 from 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund to return funds advanced but not spent for the Perris Transit Center; • $80,000,000 in 2013 Sales Tax Bonds proceeds to retire commercial paper notes; • $90,362,000 in 2013 Sales Tax Bonds proceeds to the Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund to pay interest during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project; and • $47,661,000 in 2013 Toll Bonds proceeds to to the Toll Bonds debt service fund to pay interest during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Table 56 - Capital Project Development and Delivery Uses Detail Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Legal Services Audit Services Financial Advisory Professional Services- General Total Professional Costs Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way and Land Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials Special Studies Operating and Capital Disbursements Total Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Transfers Out TOTAL Capital Project Development and Delivery Capital Project Development and Position Administrative Assistant Capital Projects Manager Chief Financial Officer Community Relations Manager Deputy Executive Director Executive Director Facilities Administrator Goods Movement Manager Government Relations Manager Planning & Programming Manager Procurement Analyst Procurement Manager Project Delivery Director Project Development Director Right of Way Manager Senior Staff Analyst Staff Analyst Toll Program Director Toll Project Manager FTE FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget $ 2,268,400 $ 3,113,100 $ 3,242,200 38,000 437,500 1,339,800 5,057,500 300,700 5,416,600 21,366,500 27,451,200 16,285,700 53,728,100 40,127,900 8,962,700 67,000 173,405,700 142,200 61,507,400 97,810,100 $ 340,492,000 4,507,900 86,500 910,000 2,188,100 7,692,500 597,100 11,852,300 27,892,500 125,934,100 29,050,000 112,246,800 42,129,000 16,455,400 40,000 50 000 365,850,100 225,000 143,413,000 302,013,41M $ 822,904,200 Delivery Staffing Summary FY 11/12 0.31 2.65 0.21 0.92 0.08 0.33 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.18 0.56 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget 2,934,200 $ 3,339,800 $ 4,573,900 60,000 600,500 2,087,300 7,321,700 302,900 7,431,800 16, 540, 900 61,628,000 29,050,000 64,716,400 42,129,000 20,500,400 70,000 242,066,500 78,300 22,990,600 100,727,100 $ 376,421,300 4,534,600 44,000 2,392,400 12,289,400 19,260,400 907,300 12,197,600 20,355,000 240,968,400 217,750,000 164,707,800 43,825,900 25,157,500 25,000 2.000.000 726,987,200 350,000 135,712,300 615,956.600 $1,502,513,600 FY 12/13 0.35 3.60 0.24 0.85 0.07 0.36 0.00 0.25 0.15 0.05 0.54 0.75 0.99 0.94 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 2.00 Dollar Change 226,700 26,700 (42,500) 1,482,400 10,101,300 11,567,900 310,200 345,300 (7,537,500) 115,034,300 188,700,000 52,461,000 1,696,900 8,702,100 (15,000) 1,750,000 361,137,100 125,000 (7,700,700) 313,943,200 $ 679,609,400 12.20 Percent Change 7% FY 13/14 1% - 49% 163% 462% 150% 52% 3% - 27% 91% 650% 47% 4% 53% - 38% 700% 99% 56% -5% 104% 83% 0.48 4.65 0.31 0.90 0.10 0.35 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.37 0.49 0.95 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 2.00 15.17 16.20 Department Budget Overview Department Description The primary responsibility of Capital Projects is the development and delivery of major highway and rail capital projects where the Commission is identified as the lead agency. The delivery of a capital project can include tasks such as feasibility studies, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, final design, right of way acquisition, construction, and construction management. Funding is also provided through Capital Projects for local jurisdiction highway and regional arterial projects based on funding agreements with the Commission. Approximately 79% of the Commission's FY 2013/14 budgeted expenditures originates in this department managed by the Toll Program, Project Delivery, and Project Development Directors responsible for the capital program. Capital Projects accelerates delivery of the Measure A, toll, state, and federally funded highway, regional arterial, and rail capital improvement projects throughout the County. Highway improvements currently in progress include the addition of mixed flow, carpool, and tolled express lanes; widening and realignment projects; and interchange improvements as well as a new CETAP corridor. Regional arterial capital improvements include funding for Western County TUMF regional arterial projects. Commuter rail capital improvements include the expansion of commuter rail service in Riverside County. This department also provides the necessary coordination between the Commission and Caltrans for the development of scope, cost, and project delivery schedules for Measure A projects that are funded by the STIP and Proposition 1B CMIA. The 2009 Measure A program includes funding to the incorporated cities and the County for local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction. The budgeted amount is set by formula established in the Measure A TIP. To be eligible to receive these Measure A funds, each city in the Western County and Coachella Valley areas and the County must participate in the TUMF program, which is administered by WRCOG in Western County and by CVAG in Coachella Valley. Additionally, for Western County jurisdictions, they must also participate in the MSHCP. Annually all cities and the County are required to submit a five-year CIP and meet a MOE requirement. Each jurisdiction's respective allocation is based on population (Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling unit (Coachella Valley) and the amount of sales tax generated. The city of La Quinta had not participated in the Coachella Valley TUMF Program prior to February 2013 when the city adopted the TUMF ordinance and entered into an agreement with CVAG to reimburse CVAG for the shortfall of prior TUMF. Accordingly, the city of La Quinta will begin to receive 50% of its allocation until the shortfall is repaid and CVAG the remaining 50%. The city of Beaumont was determined to be in noncompliance with the Western County TUMF program. As a result, Beaumont's Measure A allocation is transferred to the Commission's 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial program. Given the support required to oversee and participate in the project development work, costs for Commission staff and related support have been included in this department budget. The projects identified in the FY 2013/14 budget funded by Measure A, TUMF, state, or federal funds as well as future toll revenues require the continued support of the Bechtel program management team which includes program managers, project engineers, construction engineers, inspectors, contracts administration, and support staff. Right of Way Acquisition and Support Services The primary goal of the Right of Way Management Division is to deliver right of way in the most cost-effective manner and within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. Commission staff required to supervise and manage right of way services and related support for individual projects are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. The Commission authorized the development of a Right of Way Acquisition Program in 2006. To implement the Commission's directive, staff procured the services of on -call right of way consultant services in the fields of right of way engineering and surveying, environmental assessment, appraisal and appraisal review, acquisition and relocation, feasibility studies and cost estimates, property management, and utility relocation. These consultants are managed and supervised by the Right of Way Management Division. Property Management The Commission strives to manage its real property with the objective of maximizing existing and future public transportation benefits, safety, and income by means of professional property management policies and procedures. This includes issuing licenses and rights of entry for authorized third -party uses, as well as investigating and resolving issues regarding uses that are not authorized by the Commission. On certain occasions, the Commission may also grant easements. General maintenance activities and security measures are also part of the property management scope of work on all Commission -owned properties. The demolition and clearance of structures and other improvements on acquired property, excluding commuter rail stations, is included in the property management function. Additionally, the Commission must manage real property acquired for a project until it is required for construction. Since 1990, the Commission has acquired property assets in the course of rail and highway project implementation. To date, the rail properties number over 225 parcels. The Commission acquired approximately 500 parcels for the SR-74 widening project (Segments 1 and 2), and most of these parcels, which were related to Segment 1, have been transferred to Caltrans. In addition approximately 125 properties have been acquired for the SR-91 HOV lanes, Mid County Parkway, SR-79 realignment, SR-74 curve widening, Perris Valley Line, 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment), and SR-60 HOV lanes/I-215 to Redlands Boulevard projects. Property acquisition for the SR-91 corridor improvement project began in 2010 with 48 properties acquired to date. These properties were acquired in fee, and will be transferred primarily to Caltrans upon completion of the projects. Upon project completion, all remaining portions of properties within every project are reassessed and deemed surplus when it has been determined that the continued retention of the property no longer supports the Commission's policy goals and objectives. Long -Term Strategic Planning Several years ago, the strategic plan for the 1989 Measure A highway program was updated and provided the guidance for completion of the 1989 Measure A highway projects. A significant effort was completed in December 2006 to develop an implementation plan strategy for the 2009 Measure A state highway program, with a focus on the first 10 years of the program through 2019. An objective -based assessment of the Western County portion of the 2009 Measure A TIP was completed along with the prioritization of the program of projects. Four highway corridors, 1-215, 1-15, 1-10, and SR-91, were selected as the priority focus for the first 10 years of the 2009 Measure A program, and long-term development work was approved for large scale projects such as the development of the Mid County Parkway, realignment of SR-79, and the bi-county widening of 1-215 to San Bernardino County. Project development activities for these projects have been ongoing since an update and reprioritization was completed in most of January 2010. Since 2010, a scope reevaluation was completed on the 1-15 corridor improvement project and the Commission adopted a new scope of work which entails tolled express lanes on the northern 14 miles of 1-15 in Riverside County. The 1-10 truck climbing lanes project was deferred several years and has been replaced with added safety improvements on SR-60. For the strategic projects, preliminary engineering and environmental clearance will be completed for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment; right of way acquisition for Mid County Parkway will be considered for extraordinary acquisitions on a pay-as-you-go basis, while right of way acquisitions for SR-79 realignment will be suspended due to lack of available funding. Project costs and anticipated funding for these projects have been updated annually, and a status update has been included in each of the annual Commission workshops since 2011. Updated capital project implementation strategic plans are expected in 2019 and 2029, as required by the 2009 Measure A. CVAG has developed a strategic plan for Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial projects based upon a transportation project prioritization study that is updated periodically. The Perris Valley Line is the most significant rail capital project, and it was included in the 1989 and 2009 Measure A programs. Other rail capital projects are developed in coordination with SCRRA as well as the implementation of the Perris Valley Line. Four new Western County transportation corridors were identified through CETAP and are eligible for 2009 Measure A Western County new corridor and TUMF CETAP funding. Given the size and anticipated cost of these new corridors, they are moving forward on varied schedules with the work on the internal corridors, the Mid County Parkway and 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment) to French Valley interchange, being the most advanced. Western County TUMF regional arterial projects were approved in 2004 based on a call for projects, which is discussed in the Planning and Programming Department in section 6.2 of this document. Additionally, the Commission will participate in the improvement of a wildlife corridor crossing under SR-91, B Canyon, in collaboration with Caltrans, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. National Forest, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Parks and Recreation. The actual construction of this enhancement will be done subsequent to the construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project. These strategic planning activities play a significant part of the Commission's annual budget process, in particular the capital budget. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue its emphasis on the closeout of the 1989 Measure A program. • The Western Riverside County Delivery Plan serves as the basis for defining the 2009 Measure A project selection and prioritization. • Western County TUMF regional arterial projects are based on the list approved by the Commission in 2004. • Agreements for the advancement of 2009 Measure A funds have been obtained from CVAG and cities participating in the debt programs. The annual principal and interest payments for these loans will be deducted by the Commission from each agency's respective disbursements based on the terms of the loan agreements. • Highway project costs are based on engineers' estimates and scope agreements with Caltrans. • Construction projects are competitively bid to minimize costs. • All projects will be built to required standards. • All highway projects, with the exception of tolled express lane facilities, are transferred upon completion to Caltrans; operation of these facilities is the responsibility of Caltrans. Tolled express lane facilities, when completed, will be operated and maintained by the Commission for 50 years by agreement between Caltrans and the Commission. • The Commission will develop strategies to implement alternative financing structures including public toll roads. • 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial projects have been selected and programmed when revenues are at a level that can sustain reasonable cash flow to fund the construction projects selected for this program. A call for projects that combines available 2009 Measure A regional arterial funds with federal revenues will be conducted. • Development of the SR-79 realignment and Mid County Parkway strategic projects through preliminary engineering and environmental clearance will continue. Accomplishments • Continued implementation of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Completed construction phase for 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment) widening from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road. • Continued construction for the 60/215 East Junction and SR-91 HOV lanes projects. • Completed final design, right of way acquisition, and utility relocations and initiated procurement for construction management teams for the SR-74 curve realignment project and the I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening project. • Completed the final design, right of way acquisitions, and utility relocations and began construction for the 1- 215 corridor improvement project (central segment) widening from Scott Road to Nuevo Road. • Completed the design and right of way acquisition and utility relocations and began construction for the 1-215 bi-county HOV project. • Began the project report and environmental phase for the 1-215 corridor improvement project south connectors and the SR-60 truck climbing lane. • Continued to advance the development of the SR-91 corridor improvement project in numerous areas: • Received approval for an approximate $451 million federal loan under the U.S. DOT's TIFIA program. • Reached agreement with OCTA and Cofiroute USA, LLC to operate and maintain the 91 Express Lanes. • Completed the project report and environmental document. • Completed the procurement and awarded a contract for design -build services. • Continued to acquire the necessary property along the corridor to construct the project. • Continued final design for the 91/71 interchange improvement project. • Received Commission approval for a tolled express lane work scope for the 1-15 corridor improvement project. • Completed the construction phase for the 74/215 interchange project. • Completed the updated technical studies and engineering modifications to address the reduced project limits of the proposed Mid County Parkway project and released a recirculated environmental document for public review and comment. • Released the draft environmental document for public review and comment for the SR-79 realignment project. • Continued successful negotiations with FTA related to the Small Starts funding authorization for the Perris Valley Line. • Completed engineering for the Perris Valley Line project. • Supported public outreach activities by providing graphics from the right of way project management database for Commission presentations to facilitate public understanding of project issues. • Continued to declare property no longer needed for transportation purposes as surplus and sold several surplus properties. • Completed right of way acquisition for the Perris Valley Line project. Major Initiatives FY 2013/14 will mark the fifth year as the Commission closes out the 1989 Measure A programs and continues project activities related to the 2009 Measure A programs, of which the highway, rail, regional arterial, and local streets and roads programs represent the majority of the funding allocations. While most of the 1989 Measure A highway projects have been completed, a few projects will continue such as the SR-91 HOV lanes from Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange, SR-74 curve widening, and 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector. The 1-215 bi-county HOV gap closure project and Perris Valley Line rail projects will continue, as both are also included in the 2009 Measure A. Various stages of project development work for projects included in the Western County Highway Delivery Plan will continue in FY 2013/14. Detailed descriptions of the capital projects, including local streets and roads funding, that are included in the FY 2013/14 budget follow the Performance/Workload Indicators. Department Goals Build upon and strengthen the partnership with Caltrans toward timely delivery of identified Measure A, CMIA, toll program, and STIP projects. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship, Economic Development) Objectives: • Develop agreements with Caltrans and FHWA, as may be required, to finalize project scoping and cost issues for the STIP, federal demonstration, toll, and Measure A funded highway projects in Riverside County. • Meet the project milestones identified in the CMIA agreements between Commission, Caltrans, and the CTC. To the extent permitted by law, pursue reasonable involvement of local DBE and SBE firms in contract work. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objective: • Maintain and monitor goal for a minimum DBE participation in all federally funded contracts. Provide effective communication of project progress to the Commission board members, city councils, the County Board of Supervisors, Caltrans, CTC, FTA and FHWA. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Develop a strategy with Caltrans District 8 that would allow the Commission to advance specific projects identified in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan to take advantage of any unexpected state or federal funding which may become available through increased state or federal budget authorizations, federal stimulus, or potential loan programs to advance construction. • Conduct quarterly meetings with FTA and report on progress of Perris Valley Line project. Work with Caltrans and other agencies toward completion of preliminary engineering and environmental clearance of all projects. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objectives: • Work with Caltrans, the County, and the cities in Riverside County to complete preliminary design and environmental clearance for Measure A projects that could be eligible to receive additional or early funding from various sources that could become available if a project is sufficiently developed. • Release for public review and comment the NEPA and CEQA environmental documents for the 1-215 corridor improvement project southbound connector. • Prepare the final environmental document for the SR-79 realignment project. • Prepare and receive approval on the final environmental document for the modified Mid County Parkway project. • Initiate the project approval and environmental document of the SR-60 truck climbing lane project. • Continue the project approval and environmental document for the 1-15 corridor improvement project. Construct the highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Economic Development, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Complete closeout of the 74/215 interchange project. • Commence and complete construction of the SR-74 curve widening project and the I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening project. • Complete closeout of the 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment), the first project in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan to reach construction. • Continue construction on the 1-215 corridor improvement project (central segment) between Scott Road and Nuevo Road. • Continue construction of the 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes project and the SR-91 HOV lanes project. • Continue construction on the 1-215 bi-county HOV project. • Continue design and construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement design -build project. In coordination with the Rail Program Manager, construct capital improvements at existing commuter rail stations as identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Environmental Stewardship, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objective: • Continue construction for the Perris Valley Line. Acquire right of way for rail and highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Acquire right of way for the following projects: SR-91 corridor improvement project, SR-74 curve realignment project, 1-215 corridor improvement project (central segment), and Perris Valley Line. • Protect and maintain properties acquired for future projects. Identify alternative financing strategies in order to fully fund projects identified in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objective: • Continue the assessment and evaluation of available strategies. Location of FY 2013/14 Major Capital Projects within Riverside County INSERT MAP HERE 1) SR-74 Construction for the curve widening on SR-74 from Calvert Avenue to California Avenue. 2) 74/215 Construction close out of the interchange. 3) SR-79 Realignment between Gilman Springs Road and Domenigoni Parkway including project study report, project report, and environmental document. 4) SR-91 (A) Construction of HOV lanes from Adams Street to the 60/91/215 interchange. (B) Final design for the 91/71 interchange improvements. (C) Design -build toll and mixed flow lanes from the Orange County line to Pierce Street. 5) Mid County Parkway 6) Perris Valley Line 7) Local Streets and Roads 8) 60/215 9) 1-215 Bi-County HOV Gap Closure Project Preliminary engineering, project report, and environmental documentation for the project. Construction for the Perris Valley Line (Riverside -Moreno Valley - Perris) along the SJBL. Allocation of Measure A revenues to each city and the County to improve, maintain, and repair high priority local streets and roads. Construction of the East Junction HOV lane connectors. Construction and utility relocations for HOV lanes on the 1-215 from the 60/91/215 interchange to Orange Show Road in San Bernardino County. 10) 1-215 (A) Closeout of the south segment from 1-15 to Scott Road. (B) Construction of the central segment from Scott Road to Nuevo Road. (C) Construction of the I-215/Blaine to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening. 12) SR-60 Truck Climbing Lane Preparation of engineering and environmental document for the addition of tolled express lanes from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. Continue project approval and environmental document of the truck climbing lane project. Capital Project Development & Delivery Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Preliminary engineering (project reports and environmental documentation) contracts awarded 2 1 1 0 Plans, specifications, and estimate contracts awarded 2 1 1 1 Number of projects with active right of way acquisition 7 4 6 6 Construction awards 2 2 1 3 Highway and Rail project close-outs 2 0 0 3 License agreements managed 60 60 75 75 Appraisal and appraisal reviews completed 79 90 450 300 Capital Projects Summary The following is a summary of the capital projects included in the FY 2013/14 budget. Costs are generally categorized by preliminary engineering, final design, right of way, construction, and design -build phases in addition to other project -related costs such as salaries and benefits, Bechtel project management, and legal fees. Western County Highway and Regional Arterial Projects SR-74/1-15 to 7`h Street (P003001) Complete right of way acquisition closeout for Segment II related to the realignment and widening of four -lane roadway between Wasson Canyon Road in the city of Lake Elsinore and 7th Street in the city of Perris. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 30,000 Right of way support services $ 22,900 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 74/215 Interchange (P003015) Continue plant establishment until 2015. Preliminary engineering began in 2006 and was completed in 2009. Final design was completed in 2009. Construction began in mid-2010 and was completed in 2013. The total project cost is estimated at $30 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 750,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 30,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 176,800 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds, TUMF zone contributions, ARRA funds, and a federal earmark. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-74 Curve Widening (P003009) Continue with right of way acquisition. Construction of the project should begin 2013. The total estimated project cost is $4.2 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 3,410,000 Construction/construction management $ 310,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 215,600 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-79 Realignment (P003003 & P005127) Perform realignment environmental and preliminary engineering services from Gilman Springs Road to Domenigoni Parkway. The project is expected to be completed with the environmental phase in 2014. The total estimated project cost is $1.2 billion. Initiation of subsequent phases will be dependent upon the availability of funding. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 4,000,000 Preliminary engineering $ 317,500 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact None; costs have been funded using TUMF regional arterial, federal earmarks, and SAFETEA-LU federal funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-79 Widening/Thompson to Domenigoni (P005114) Provide funding and support to complete construction for the widening of SR-79 to four lanes. Right of way acquisition was completed in 2012. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 3,000,000 Construction Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A regional arterial funds with the County of Riverside as lead agency. The Measure A funding commitment for this project was $7.1 million. N/A; state highway and regional arterial operations are the responsibility of Caltrans and the local jurisdiction, respectively. SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (P003026 & P003028) Continue property acquisition and start final design and construction for the tolled express and mixed flow lanes project from the Orange County line to Pierce Street, including tolled express lanes connectivity to 1-15 and improvements to the 15/91 interchange. Project development activities began in September 2007 and lanes are expected to be open to traffic in 2017. The SR-91 corridor improvement project cost is estimated at $1.3 billion. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 100,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 135,310,000 $ 217,750,000 $ 6,822,400 Preliminary engineering Construction/support services Right of way acquisition/support services Design -build Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds, including sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, a federal TIFIA loan, STIP, and SLPP funds. Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilities are the responsibility of the Commission, while all other state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Current estimates of annual operating and maintenance costs are $11,200,000. Such costs will be paid from the collection of toll revenues beginning in 2017. 91/71 Interchange Improvements Project (P003021) Continue final design for interchange improvements to the 91/71 interchange. Final design began in March 2012. The total estimated project cost is $123 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 4,600,000 $ 3,335,000 $ 554,300 Final design Right of way acquisition/support services Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Costs for final design and right of way acquisition will be primarily funded using Congressionally -designated federal funding remaining from previous area projects. The balance of funding will come from 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-91 HOV Lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 Interchange (P003005) Begin construction and complete utility relocations. Preliminary engineering began in 2001. Construction of the project should be completed in the summer of 2015. The estimated total project cost is $273 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact $ 32,000 $ 150,000 $ 11,444,000 $ 672,700 Final design Construction Right of way acquisition/support services Other project -related costs Final design costs will be funded using Letter of No Prejudice funds received and CMAQ with 1989 Measure A highway funds for local match. Right of way costs will be funded using STIP-RIP, Traffic Congestion Relief Program, CMAQ, and 1989 Measure A highway funds. CMAQ and CMIA funds generated by Proposition 1B will be used for construction activities. Caltrans is the lead agency. Operating Budget Impact N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-91/La Sierra Avenue Interchange (P003014) Provide funding and support to complete construction to widen and fully improve La Sierra Avenue from SR-91 to El Sobrante Road. The landscaping and plant establishment portion of the project is expected to be completed in mid-2013. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 33,000 Construction Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds with the city of Riverside as lead agency. The Measure A funding commitment for this project was $27.2 million. N/A; state highway and regional arterial operations are the responsibility of Caltrans and the local jurisdiction, respectively. 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project (P003027) Resume preliminary engineering and environmental work originally started in April 2008, as the Commission approved a scope of work in early 2013 that will add two tolled express lanes in each direction from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. The estimated total project cost is $415 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 7,000,000 Preliminary engineering $ 2,110,000 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Project development costs and a portion of construction will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. It is anticipated that toll revenue bonds will be issued and the Commission will secure a federal TIFIA loan to complete the project financing plan in the future. Operating Budget Impact Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilities are the responsibility of the Commission, while all other federal and state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Preliminary estimates of annual operating and maintenance costs are $15 million. Such costs will be paid from the collection of toll revenues. I-15/Los Alamos Road Bridge Replacement (P003036) Provide funding and support to begin construction in 2013. Construction of the project is expected to be completed by 2014. The total project cost is estimated at $3.8 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 900,000 Construction Measure A Budget Impact 2009 Measure A highway funds will be used for construction. The Measure Operating Budget Impact A funding commitment for this project was approximately $2.9 million. The city of Murrieta is the lead agency for construction. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 60/215 East Junction HOV Lane Connectors (P003017) Complete construction of the project in 2014. Preliminary engineering began in 2006. Final design and right of way acquisition were completed in 2010. The total project cost is estimated at $42 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,055,000 Construction/support services $ 274,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 82,600 Other project -related costs STP and CMAQ, with STIP-RIP and STIP-IIP for local match funds, will be used for construction. Caltrans is the lead agency for construction. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvements (South Widening Segment)/1-15 to Scott Road (P003022) Conclude project closeout as construction was completed in 2012. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and was completed in 2008. Final design began in 2008 and was completed in 2010. The total project cost is estimated at $33 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 1,700,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 148,800 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using STIP-RIP funds and 2009 Measure A highway funds; CMIA funds generated by Proposition 1B bonds will be used for construction activities. Operating Budget Impact N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvements (Central Segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road (P003023) Continue to add one mixed flow lane in each direction. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and was completed in 2011. Final design began in 2011 and was completed in December 2012; construction began in 2013. Construction of the project is expected to be completed by 2016. The total project cost is estimated at $120 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 45,500,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 730,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 1,240,900 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using CMIA, STIP-RIP, and 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvement Southbound Connector (P003031) Continue preliminary engineering, which began in 2010, to widen southbound connector to 1-15 with construction expected to be completed by 2019. The total project cost is estimated at $8.5 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 800,000 Preliminary engineering $ 150,000 Final design $ 99,300 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard Widening (P003035) Commence construction to widen the 1-215 from Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard. Construction is expected to be completed in 2013. Total project cost is $2.2 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 2,057,300 Construction/construction management $ 153,900 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds and STP. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Mid County Parkway (P002302 & P005123) Perform activities related to the development of a recirculated project report and environmental document for a new corridor from 1-215 to SR-79. The environmental phase is anticipated to be completed in FY 2013/14. Construction of this new facility will be completed over many years as funding becomes available and is estimated to cost $1.3-1.6 billion. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 2,300,000 Preliminary engineering $ 250,000 Final design $ 6,182,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 623,500 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded with TUMF CETAP funds and 2009 Measure A new corridor funds. N/A; responsibility for highway operations has not been determined. Various Western County Highway Projects (P623999 & P312402) Provide funding and support for the engineering, construction, and right of way activities related to various Western County highway projects. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 100,000 Environmental engineering $ 20,000 Right of way support services Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Various Western County Measure A and TUMF Regional Arterial Projects (P005201, P005102, P005103, P005104, P005105, P005106, P005107, P005108, P005113, P005115, P005116, P005118, P005119, P005120, P005128, P005132, P665102 & P725000) Provide Western County Measure A and TUMF funding and support for the engineering, right of way, and construction activities related to various Western County Measure A and TUMF regional arterial projects approved by the Commission in September 2004 following a call for projects. Total project costs approved for TUMF regional arterial projects approximate $79 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact $ 823,000 Engineering and design $ 40,784,100 Construction $ 3,545,800 Right of way acquisition $ 326,000 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using TUMF regional arterial and 2009 Measure A Operating Budget Impact regional arterial funds with various local jurisdictions as lead agency for their respective projects. N/A; regional arterial operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdictions. MSHCP Land Acquisition in Western County (PO02800) Provide funding and support for the acquisition of land as mitigation for the cumulative and indirect impacts associated with construction of future highway projects as required by 2009 Measure A. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Rail Projects $ 3,000,000 Land acquisition Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; land mitigation operations are the responsibility of RCA. North Main Corona Station Parking Structure (PO03808) Complete construction close-out of a parking structure at the North Main Corona station. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 20,000 Construction management $ 133,200 Other project -related costs 1989 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations of this parking structure will be the responsibility of the Commission. Annual operating costs are estimated at $300,000 to be funded with LTF. Perris Multimodal Facility (P003816) Complete construction close-out of the Perris Transit Center. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 50,000 Construction management $ 10,000 Right of way support services $ 220,700 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using Proposition 1B PTMISEA and a contribution from the 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Assistance fund. Operations of this facility will be the responsibilities of the Commission and RTA, as defined in a cooperative agreement. Annual operating costs are estimated at $76,000. Perris Valley Line and Other Rail Projects (PO03800, PO03823, PO03824, PO03825, PO03827, PO03828, PO03829, PO03830, PO03831, PO03832, PO03833, and PO03834) Continue final design for extension of commuter rail services to Perris. Project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from FTA to move into project development. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the SJBL branch line at Highgrove. Expected completion date of the Perris Valley Line is July 2015 for a total project cost of $248.3 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 133,197,000 Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 427,000 $ 13,824,100 Construction/construction management/support services Right of way acquisition/support services Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using FTA, CMAQ, STP, and 1989 Measure A rail funds as well as proceeds from sales of surplus properties. Subsequent year costs will also include STIP funding. Rail station operations related to this project, which will be the responsibility of the Commission upon completion of the project, will be funded with LTF and property management fees. Rail service and capital operations will be the responsibility of Metrolink and will be funded by the Commission with LTF and STA based on an allocation determined by Metrolink. Annual station operations approximate $300,000 per station, or $1,200,000 annually in the aggregate for four proposed stations. Station Rehabilitation (PO04011) Provide funding and support for station rehabilitation activities at various rail stations. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 2,260,000 Construction/construction management Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using Proposition 1B funds. Operating Budget Impact Operations of all commuter rail stations are the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using LTF. CCTV Operations Center (PO04018) Provide funding and support for a CCTV operations center at the Riverside downtown station. Final design and construction are expected to begin in August 2013. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 200,000 Final Design $ 1,150,000 Construction/construction management $ 50,000 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using Proposition 1B funds and 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations will be the responsibility of the Commission. Annual operating costs are estimated at $20,000 to be funded with 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Riverside Station Pedestrian Improvements (PO04019) Provide funding and support for the Riverside downtown station pedestrian improvement project. Construction is expected to begin October 2013. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,152,000 Construction/construction management Costs will be funded using state TE grant funds and 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations of the Riverside downtown station are the responsibility of the Commission. Annual operating costs are estimated at $450,000 to be funded with LTF. Various Western County Rail Projects (P332402 and 244001) Provide Measure A funding and support for right of way activities related to various rail projects. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Local Streets and Roads $ 5,000 Final design $ 60,000 Right of way support services $ 1,136,900 Other project -related costs 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A rail funds. Annually monitor the MOE requirements to ensure local agencies are expending funds according to the 2009 Measure A ordinance. Review local agency five-year CIPs to ensure Measure A funds are expended on eligible local street and road projects. Western County Area Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Western County. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Coachella Valley $ 470,000 Banning 0 Beaumont 132,000 Calimesa 148,000 Canyon Lake 3,279,000 Corona 882,000 Eastvale 1,422,000 Hemet 1,487,000 Jurupa Valley 993,000 Lake Elsinore 1,261,000 Menifee 3,136,000 Moreno Valley 1,836,000 Murrieta 533,000 Norco 1,194,000 Perris 5,918,000 Riverside 684,000 San Jacinto 2,429,000 Temecula 487,000 Wildomar 4,344,000 Riverside County 659,000 Commission 31,294,000 Total Western County (659,100) Less: Allocation to Western County regional arterials (Beaumont allocation) $ 30,634,900 Total Western County, net All costs will be distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Coachella Valley. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,274,000 Cathedral City 578,000 Coachella 437,000 Desert Hot Springs 231,000 Indian Wells 1,515,000 Indio 693,500 La Quinta 2,478,000 Palm Desert 1,854,000 Palm Springs 814,000 Rancho Mirage 1,605,000 Riverside County 693,500 CVAG (50% of La Quinta allocation) $ 12,173,000 Total Coachella Valley All costs will be distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Palo Verde Valley Area Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Palo Verde Valley. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 810,000 Blythe 208,000 Riverside County Total Palo Verde Valley $ 1,018,000 All costs will be distributed in accordance with 200'3 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Riverside County Transportation Commission rhulb PrA Community Profile Riverside County is the fourth largest county in California, stretching westward nearly 200 miles from the Colorado River and comprising more than 7200 square miles that include 28 incorporated cities. Riverside County can trace its beginning back to 1893 when voters approved the formation of a new county. The area was carved from parts of San Bernardino and San Diego counties. In its 120 years of existence, the County's economy has diversified and prospered. Originally, Riverside County was a very agricultural area, known for a wide variety of crops grown on its fertile soils. The County remains a strong agricultural area, but it is increasingly becoming a leader in manufacturing, transportation, construction, and tourism. Demographics The success of the area has brought dramatic population growth to Riverside County (Chart 39). Since the 1980's, the County has been one of the fastest growing counties in the State. Chart 39 — Population — Last Ten Years 2,500,000 --- ---- 2,000,000 1,son oao 1,000,000 500,000 0 1 o3 tioo° Source: California Department of Finance 1 The available and affordable housing in Riverside County has attracted many people to the County (Chart 40); however, housing is gradually recovering from a slowdown due to the effect of the subprime mortgages, ensuing credit crisis, and recession. Chart 40 — Home Price Advantage Home Value Advantage Riverside County and Southern California Markets (February, 2013) 1 ■ Median Home Values ❑Riverside County Advantage $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Riverside Source: Data Quick News Los Angeles San Diego Ventura County Orange #257;000 During the growth period, jobs also increased as many firms relocated to the area and moved away from older communities; however, the recent economic slowdown had caused the County's unemployment rate to rise from its near all-time lows (Chart 41). The unemployment rate has been decreasing. Chart 41— Unemployment Rate (%) — Last Ten Years 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% e e e Source: California Employment Development Department The overall economic outlook for Riverside County is expected to continue to improve in 2014 based on various economic forecasts. The area is preparing for its future as well in supporting better education. The County is home to a number of colleges and universities including University of California, Riverside. Statistical Information Retail Sales As a result of demographic changes and growth, retail sales in the County increased through 2007 (Chart 42 and Table 57); however, the effect of the recent recession on retail sales was noted in sales tax receipts beginning in 2008. FY 2012/13 retail sales have shown continued improvements from these previous years. Chart 42 — Retail Sales (%) - $25 Billion — 2011 Data Other Retail Sales 6.67% Source: State Board of Equalization Apparel Stores 5.88% 5.09% Automotive 24.61% Household & Electronics 3.57% Building Materials 5.08% Table 57 -Riverside County Taxable Sales by Business Type (in 000's) - Last Five Years 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Apparel Stores $ 1,505,821 $ 1,391,174 $ 1,293,271 $ 1,121,543 $ 1,171,013 General Merchandise 3,051,709 2,947,905 2,855,733 3,389,936 3,593,134 Food Stores 1,304,731 1,267,758 1,251,220 1,254,366 1,352,609 Eating & Drinking 2,473,339 2,317,486 2,266,853 2,340,554 2,388,039 Household & Electronics 914,888 883,109 858,098 816,379 843,945 Building Materials 1,303,073 1,232,145 1,237,518 1,435,337 1,961,911 Automotive 6,311,272 5,306,408 4,749,994 6,126,512 7,137,075 Other Retail Sales 1,711,453 1,480,601 1,442,875 3,250,335 2,794,790 Total all other services & outlets 7,065,212 6,326.196 6.272,315 6,268,633 7,781,093 $ 25,641,498 $ 23,152,782 S 22,227,877 $ 26,003,595 $ 29.023,609 Source: State Board of Equalization The 2011 taxable sales generation by jurisdiction in the County, including ranking compared to 2002, is presented in Table 58. Table 58 -Taxable Sales Generation by Jurisdiction in Riverside County for 20111 Taxable Sales (inoon) %of Total 2011 Rank 2002 Rank City of Riverside $ 4,019,127 15.7% 2 2 City of Corona 2,715,071 10.6% 3 3 City of Temecula 2,364,795 9.2% 4 4 City of Palm Desert 1,384,208 5.4% 5 5 City of Moreno Valley 1,172,223 4.6% 6 6 City of Murrieta 965,758 3.8% 7 11 City of Palm Springs 880,426 3.4% 8 10 City of Hemet 799,835 3.1% 9 7 City of La Quinta 680,382 2.8% 10 15 City of Indio 650,281 2.6% 11 9 City of Lake Elsinore 634,553 2.5% 12 13 City of Cathedral City 606,771 2.4% 13 8 City of Perris 584,313 2.3% 14 14 City of Menifee 421,545 1.6% 15 N/A City of Norco 384,972 1.5% 16 12 City of Rancho Mirage 374,093 1.5% 17 16 City of Eastvale 340,171 1.3% 18 N/A City of Beaumont 317,192 1.2% 19 20 City of Coachella 289,223 1.1% 20 19 City of San Jacinto 193,050 0.8% 21 21 City of Jurupa Valley 184,926 0.7% 22 N/A City of Banning 157,071 0.6% 23 17 City of Blythe 145,422 0.5% 24 18 City ofWildomar 116,696 0.4% 25 N/A City of Desert Hot Springs 113,904 0.4% 26 22 City of Indian Wells 84,987 0.3% 27 24 City of Calimesa 57,965 0.2% 28 23 City of Canyon Lake 12,660 0.0% 29 25 Incorporated 20,651,620 80.5% Unincorporated county area 4,989,878 19.5% 1 Countywide $ 25,641,498 100.0% California Source: California State Board of Equalization 1 Year represents most recent data available $ 520,568,055 Measure A Sales Taxes Measure A is a one-half of one cent transaction and use tax for transportation improvements in Riverside County. The County had an 8.75% sales tax rate including the Measure A rate through June 2011, 7.75% from July 2011 through December 2012, and 8.00% thereafter (Table 59). Table 59 - Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates - Last Five Years Fiscal Year 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Measure A Direct Rate County of Riverside 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 8.00% 7.75% 8.75% 8.75% 8.75% Source: Commission Finance Department and California State Board of Equalization Since the recent economic slowdown, changes have occurred in the economic categories in which the Measure A sales tax was generated (Table 60). General retail and transportation represented the two highest economic categories and more than 56% of sales taxes generated. Transportation has improved in recent years due to high fuel prices and new auto purchases. Construction, which was comprised of the building materials wholesale and building materials retail segments, is a significant contributor and has shown slight improvement from previous years of declines due to the effects of the recession and housing slowdown. Table 60 - Sales Tax by Economic Category Economic Category 2009/4 2010/4 2011/4 2012/4 % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total General Retail 30.9% 30.9% 29.9% 29.0% Transportation 22.8% 25.0% 27.1% 27.0% Food Products 17.8% 17.0% 16.4% 16.4% Business to Business 15.2% 14.5% 14.1% 14.7% Construction 11.1% 10.5% 10.5% 10.9% Miscellaneous 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Source: MuniServices, LLC Each economic category consists of several economic segments, which provide additional information regarding economic activity in the County. In 2009 the top six economic segments consisted of miscellaneous retail, auto sales -new, department stores, service stations, restaurants, and building materials -wholesale. Over the next three calendar years, auto sales -new and building materials wholesale have improved, while service stations, department stores, and restaurants have comprised the top three economic segments. The top six economic segments in 2012 with comparisons to previous years are presented in Table 61. Table 61- Sales Tax by Economic Segment Top Six Economic Segments (Category) 2009/4 2010/4 2011/4 2012/4 % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total Service Stations (Transportation) Department Stores (General Retail) Auto Sales - New (Transportation) Restaurants (Food Products) Building Materials - Wholesale (Construction) Miscellaneous Retail (Miscellaneous) Source: MuniServices, LLC 10.0% 12.9% 7.9% 11.0% 5.8% 6.5% 11.6% 12.6% 8.4% 10.7% 5.5% 6.7% 12.9% 11.8% 9.1% 10.3% 6.1% 6.6% 11.9% 11.2% 10.0% 10.0% 6.5% 6.3% Commission Facts Programs and Services Measure A: The Commission administers Measure A, the local half -cent sales tax for new transportation projects in the County. Under Measure A, funding is used to improve highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, local streets and roads, transit and specialized transportation services including commuter assistance, economic development, new corridors, and Commission administration. Measure A expires in 2039. Transportation Development Act: The TDA is comprised of two elements: Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance funding. The Commission administers the LTF one -quarter of one cent of the state sales tax on behalf of the County. STA is generated from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel and is allocated by the State to the Commission on the basis of population and as a percentage of transit fare revenues. TDA funding is allocated primarily to bus and rail transit operators for transit operating and capital needs. Additionally, LTF funding is available for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, planning, and administration and allocated to the Commission and local jurisdictions in the County. Highways: The Commission assists with the planning and funding for highway improvements. Major current projects include: 60/215 East junction HOV lanes connector, SR-74 curve widening, 91/71 connectors, SR-91 corridor improvement project, SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to the 60/91/215 interchange, 1-15 corridor improvement project, 1-215 corridor mobility improvement projects, and Mid County Parkway. State highway maintenance is generally the responsibility of Ca!trans. Local Streets and Roads: The Commission administers funding to local jurisdictions to improve streets, intersections, signal coordination, and pavement. Local streets and roads maintenance is the responsibility of the local jurisdictions. Commuter Rail: The Commission funds and oversees Metrolink rail services within the County. The Commission's three Metrolink lines are the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 lines. The Commission owns and maintains five Metrolink stations and one transit center located at: ➢ Riverside Downtown Station, 4066 Vine Street, Riverside ➢ La Sierra Station, 10901 Indiana Avenue, Riverside ➢ Pedley Station, 6001 Pedley Road, Riverside ➢ North Main Corona Station, 250 E. Blaine Street, Corona ➢ West Corona Station, 155 S. Auto Center Drive, Corona ➢ Perris Multimodal Transit Center, 121 S. C Street, Perris Motorist Assistance: The Commission provides emergency call boxes and the 1E511 traveler information system through the SAFE and offers emergency towing services through the FSP. Commuter Assistance: The Commission provides a variety of rideshare services both to employers and commuters. Through voluntary participation, commuters and employers receive a direct benefit from their sales tax dollars, and the entire region benefits from reduced traffic congestion and improved air quality. Specialized Transit: The Commission maintains a strong commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its Specialized Transit Program, the Commission has provided millions of dollars to public and nonprofit transit operators to assist in the provisions of special transit services to improve the mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities. OMR aim minim--__ Riverside County Transportation Cession ttt9tn 1,3 ci Q piAllt(t Glossary of Acronyms ADA — Americans with Disabilities Act ARRA* — American Recovery and Reinvestment Act AT — Active Transportation BABs — Build America Bonds Bank of America — Bank of America, N.A. Bank of Tokyo — The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch Bechtel — Bechtel Infrastructure BNSF — Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Board — Board of Commissioners for the Riverside County Transportation Commission CABS — Capitalized Appreciation Bonds CAFR — Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CaIPERS — California Public Employees Retirement System Caltrans — California Department of Transportation CAGTC — Coalition for America's Gateways and Trade Corridors CEQA — California Environmental Quality Act CETAP — Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process CHP — California Highway Patrol CHSRA — California High Speed Rail Authority CIBs — Current Interest Bonds CIP — Capital Improvement Plan CMA — Congestion Management Agency CMAQ* — Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality CM IA* — Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (Proposition 1B funding category) CMP — Congestion Management Program CMS — Congestion Management System Commission — Riverside County Transportation Commission Coordinated Plan — Coordinated Public Transit —Human Services Transportation Plan County — County of Riverside CTC — California Transportation Commission CTSA — Consolidated Transportation Service Agency CVAG — Coachella Valley Association of Governments Deutsche Bank — Deutsche Bank AG DBE — Disadvantaged Business Enterprise DMV — Department of Motor Vehicles ERP — Enterprise Resource Planning ETC — Employer Transportation Coordinators FHWA* — Federal Highway Administration FITCH — Fitch Ratings FSP — Freeway Service Patrol FTA* — Federal Transit Administration FTE — Full-time Equivalent FTIP — Federal Transportation Improvement Program FY — Fiscal Year GASB — Governmental Accounting Standards Board GFOA — Government Finance Officers Association GPS — Global Positioning System HOV — High Occupancy Vehicle (Carpool Lane) I — Interstate 1E511 — Inland Empire 511 IEOC — Inland Empire —Orange County Metrolink Service IIP* — Interregional Improvement Program Inland Empire — Region covering Riverside and San Bernardino counties IVR — Interactive Voice Response JARC — Jobs Access Reverse Commute (FTA Section 5316) JPMorgan — JP Morgan Chase Bank LIBOR — London Interbank Offer Rate LOS — Level of Service LOSSAN — Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo, a rail corridor LTF* — Local Transportation Fund Measure K — Increase of sales tax revenue bonds debt limit to $975 million approved by voters in November 2010 Metrolink — Operating Name for SCRRA (see SCRRA) Moody's — Moody's Investors Service MOE — Maintenance of Effort MOU — Memorandum of Understanding MSHCP — Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan MSRC — Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (AB 2766) NEPA — National Environmental Policy Act OA — Obligation Authority OCTA — Orange County Transportation Authority Perris Valley Line — Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project PM — Particulate Matter Ports — Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach PPM — Planning, Programming, and Monitoring PTMISEA* — Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (Proposition 1B transit funding category) RCA — Regional Conservation Authority RCTC — Riverside County Transportation Commission RFA — Request for Authorization RIP* — Regional Improvement Program RTA — Riverside Transit Agency RTP — Regional Transportation Plan RTPA — Regional Transportation Planning Agency RZEDBs — Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds S&P — Standard & Poor's Rating Service SAFE — Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies SAFETEA-LU* — Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Sales Tax — Reference including transaction and use tax such as Measure A SAN BAG — San Bernardino Associated Governments SB375 — Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg) California's Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act SB821 — Senate Bill 821 LTF Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds SBE — Small Business Enterprise SBOE — State Board of Equalization SBPAs — Standby Bond Purchase Agreements SCAG — Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SCRRA — Southern California Regional Rail Authority SCS — Sustainable Communities Strategy Series A Tax -Exempt— Series of tax-exempt bonds issued under 2010 Bonds Series B Taxable — Series of taxable Build America Bonds issued under 2010 Bonds SHCC — Self -Help Counties Coalition SJBL — San Jacinto Branch Line SLPP* — State Local Partnership Program SR — State Route SRTP — Short Range Transit Plan SSAB — Salton Sea Air Basin STA* — State Transit Assistance State — State of California STIP* — State Transportation Improvement Program STP* — Surface Transportation Program SunLine — SunLine Transit Agency TAC — Technical Advisory Committee TAP — Transportation Alternatives Program TCIF* — Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (Proposition 1B funding category) TDA* — Transportation Development Act TE* — Transportation Enhancements TIFIA* — Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act TIGER — Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery TIP — Transportation Improvement Plan TUMF* — Transportation/Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (Western County/Coachella Valley) Union Bank — Union Bank, N.A. U.S. DOT — United States Department of Transportation Western County — Western area of Riverside County WRCOG — Western Riverside Council of Governments 1989 Measure A* — Original 1/2 cent transportation sales tax measure approved by voters in November 1988 2009 Measure A* — Extension of sales tax measure approved by voters in November 2002 which became effective upon expiration of original sales tax measure on July 1, 2009 2009 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series A, B and C issued in October 2009 2010 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series A Tax-exempt and Series B Taxable issued in November 2010 2013 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds anticipated to be issued in July 2013 2013 Toll Bonds — Toll Revenue Bonds anticipated to be issued in July 2013 * Additional information provided in Funding Definitions. Funding Definitions Federal Funding Sources Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act The TIFIA program provides credit assistance for qualified projects of regional and national significance that are critical improvements to the nation's surface transportation system. It is designed to fill market gaps and leverage substantial private and non-federal co -investment by providing supplemental and subordinate capital. TIFIA credit assistance is often available on more advantageous terms than in the financial market making it possible to obtain financing, in the form of a secured loan, loan guarantee, and/or standby line of credit, for needed projects when it might not otherwise be possible. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Commonly referred to as the Stimulus or The Recovery Act, ARRA is an economic stimulus package "intended to create jobs and promote investment and consumer spending" during the recent recession. It includes domestic spending in infrastructure with investment transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure providing long-term economic benefits. ARRA also created the Build America Bond program, which authorized state and local governments to issue in 2009 and 2010 such bonds as taxable bonds to finance capital expenditures for which would otherwise be financed with tax-exempt governmental bonds. State and local governments issuing BABs receive a direct federal subsidy payment for a portion of their borrowing costs on BABs equal to 35 to 45 percent of the total coupon interest paid to investors. The BAB program was intended to assist state and local governments finance capital projects at lower borrowing costs and to stimulate the economy and create jobs. Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 formula funds made available to urbanized areas for operating subsidies, capital projects and planning. Operating match is up to 50% of the net operating cost; capital and planning match is 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5309 discretionary funds generally provided to urbanized areas for funding new start rail projects, major bus fleet replacement, and transit facility construction. Matching ratios range from 50/50 to 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5310 funds made available to states for providing capital support to private non-profit and, in certain circumstances, public transit operators. This is a state administered discretionary program providing funds on an 88.53% federal and 11.47% local basis. Section 5311 funds provided to support rural transit operating subsidies and capital projects. Operating match is up to 50% of the net operating cost; capital match is 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5316 funds provided for the development and maintenance of jobs access projects to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from work during non -peak hours as well as supply reverse commute options for workers in suburban areas. Section 5317 funds made available for new public transportation services and alternatives for people with disabilities beyond the requirements of the ADA of 1990. Federal Highway Administration In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) was approved by Congress to replace the former Federal Aid Urban/Federal Aid System funding programs. ISTEA was established as a six -year funding program and was reauthorized for another six years in 1997. This new transportation act was renamed as the Transportation Equity Act of the Twenty-first Century (TEA21) and was extended through August 10, 2005 when the President signed into law SAFETEA-LU. With guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation totaling $244.1 billion, SAFETEA-LU represents the largest surface transportation investment in our nation's history. Under these programs the following fund sources are allocated to each county, and the Commission further allocates these funds based on federal provisions. Surface Transportation Program Funds allocated by the Commission and administered by Caltrans that provide funding for local street and road improvements. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds allocated by the Commission for transportation related air quality improvement projects in air quality non -attainment areas. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. Safety projects can qualify for 100% of CMAQ funding. Transportation Enhancements The amount of funds made available under this program is 10% of the state apportionment of STP funds. Projects are qualified and prioritized by the Commission and submitted to the California Transportation Commission for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program. The basic definition of a transportation enhancement project is an improvement that is over and above the base transportation project. Project categories are pedestrian and bicycle facilities, scenic or historic highways, scenic beautification, historic preservation, rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities, preservation of abandoned railway corridors, control/removal of outdoor advertising, archaeological planning and research, and mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. State Local Funding Sources State Transportation Improvement Program The STIP consists of RIP and IIP funds. The RIP and IIP programs are mainly supported by Proposition 42 funding. The RIP component represents 75% of STIP funds available for capacity projects. Regional Transportation Planning Agencies are responsible for selection of projects proposed for RIP funds. The IIP component represents the remaining 25% of STIP funds available for capacity projects and Caltrans is responsible for the selection of IIP-funded projects. The Commission and Caltrans District 8 work closely in coordinating projects for these fund sources. Proposition 1B Program In November 2006, the voters in California approved Proposition 1B, which will fund various transportation programs from bonds issued by the state of California. Programs to be funded include CMIA, transit capital (PTMISEA), transit security (CTSGP-CTAF), STIP supplement, goods movement (TCIF), SLPP funds, and cities and counties. Transportation Development Act The TDA is comprised of two elements: LTF and STA funds. LTF funds are derived from 1/4 of one cent of the state sales tax and are returned to source. There are three areas of apportionment within Riverside County comprised of Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley (Blythe). The Commission administers the LTF on behalf of the County of Riverside. Funds are provided for program administration, Southern California Association of Governments regional planning, local transportation planning, and transit services in Western County and the Coachella Valley. In the Palo Verde Valley, funds support transit services and local street and road improvements. Additionally, under SB 821, 2% of LTF funds are made available for bicycle and pedestrian projects. STA funds are generated from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel and are allocated by the state to the Commission based on population and as a percentage of transit fare revenue. The Commission has generally used these funds to support capital purchases and improvements as these funds have been subject to state budgetary actions. Local Funding Sources Measure A Measure A is a half -cent local retail transaction and use tax that was initially approved by the voters in November 1988 for 20 years (Ordinance 88-1) and extended in November 2002 for an additional 30 years (Ordinance 02-001), through June 2039, to help fund key transportation improvements in Riverside County. It provides funds to improve highways, regional arterials, and local streets and roads; to develop new transportation corridors; to expand commuter rail, public transit, specialized transportation services, and commuter programs; develop a program of economic incentives to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs; and support bond financing. These types of improvements are needed to maintain and improve the quality of life in the County, reduce current congestion, and provide adequate transportation facilities to accommodate reasonable growth. Since existing state and federal sources provide only a limited amount of funding for a limited number of projects, Measure A will cover the shortfall for key projects with a funding source that is under local control. It will use the revenue generated in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley to meet the unique transportation needs of each of those areas. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee The TUMF program was adopted by all local jurisdictions in the Western County area of Riverside County in July 2003. Under this program, which is administered by the WRCOG, fees are assessed on new residential and commercial development in Western County to ensure that new development pays its fair share toward providing the needed infrastructure improvements on the regional system of highways and arterials. In accordance with the extension of Measure A in 2002 and an amended Memorandum of Understanding with WRCOG, the Commission shall receive 48.7% of the TUMF revenues to fund equally the regional arterial system and the development of new corridors. Program Terms The following explanations of terms are presented to aid in understanding the various program terms used and discussed in the narrative. Bicycle and Pedestrian LTF provides revenues for the construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and related right-of-way costs. Bond Financing In order to accomplish the construction of the highway and rail projects and implementation of the local streets and roads and other programs identified in the Measure A TIP as soon as possible, some level of borrowing will be required. A portion of the revenues generated in the Western County will be made available for this purpose. Commuter Assistance The purpose of this program is to provide short-term incentives to encourage single occupant vehicle drivers to use alternate modes of transportation including carpools, vanpools, bus pools, public bus, commuter rail, walking, and bicycling. Commuter Rail Measure A provides operating and capital revenue for commuter rail service to Orange and Los Angeles counties. LTF provides revenue for commuter rail operations in Riverside County. These trains operate on existing railroad tracks parallel to major freeways. Commuter rail service provides a safe and reliable transit alternative to driving alone during the peak period. Plans to expand commuter rail service in Western Riverside County from Riverside to Perris via Moreno Valley are currently underway. Economic Development Measure A will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve existing interchanges, construct new interchanges, provide public transit linkages or stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system in Western County. These incentives are intended to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate within the Western County area. Highways Measure A provides revenues to widen existing highways, expand interchanges, and improve remote freeways. These improvements are needed to control traffic congestion in Western County and improve access and safety in Coachella Valley. Costs of these improvements will be covered by funds from state and federal sources. Measure A revenue will be used to supplement —not replace —these other sources and to accelerate work on projects deferred for lack of funding. Local Streets and Roads Measure A provides revenues to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. The County and local cities are required to supplement those expenditures with other previously dedicated revenue sources to maintain road improvements at a level equal to or greater than the base year amount. LTF provides revenue for local street and road improvements in the Palo Verde Valley. Metrolink The Commission's commuter rail program is part of the regional network operated by SCRRA operating under the name of Metrolink, a five -county joint powers agency composed of the transportation commission's of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, and Ventura. The purpose of this agency is to manage the operation and maintenance of commuter rail in the five -county metropolitan area. Motorist Assistance The Motorist Assistance program has three elements. The FSP is a special team of tow trucks that travel on selected Riverside County freeways during peak commute hours to assist drivers when their cars break down. Another element is the call box system, which installation and operation is made possible with revenue provided by the public. Call boxes are being provided by the Commission, which serves as the County's SAFE. The third element is the Inland Empire 511 traveler information system. One dollar per year from every motor vehicle registration pays for the call boxes and their operation and maintenance, 1E511 operations, and matching funds for FSP. New Corridors Four new transportation corridors were identified through the CETAP. Measure A and TUMF funds will be used for environmental clearance, right of way, and construction of these new corridors. Public Transit The Commission is the agency responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming and coordinating the operation of all public transportation service within the County. The Commission allocates and disburses TDA as well as Measure A funds to the transit operators for operating and capital purposes. Regional Arterials Measure A funds generated within the Western County and Coachella Valley areas are used for major regional road projects. The system is to be implemented with a mix of funding required from new development under a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee to be paid by developers from new development and from Measure A funds returned to the Western County and Coachella Valley areas. The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee schedule shall be established in order to generate at least the equivalent of Measure A funding toward the regional arterial system. Specialized Transit Measure A provides public transit revenues to improve transportation services for seniors, persons with disabilities and commuters. For seniors and persons with disabilities, it provides dial -a -ride cab service at night for emergency purposes, guarantees half-price bus fares, and assists centers with their transit programs. For commuters, it improves express bus service and expands ridesharing programs. In the Coachella Valley, revenues also are available for bus replacement and local bus service. Transportation Improvement Plan This plan also acts as the County's expenditure plan and was prepared by the Commission for the proposed 1/2% local retail transaction and use tax for transportation purposes to be collected. This was proposed by the Commission as a means to fill the funding shortfall to implement needed highway, regional arterial, economic development incentives, and new corridors; local street and road programs; commuter rail projects and operations; public bus transit and specialized transportation improvements; commuter assistance programs; and bond financing. General Terms The following explanations of terms are presented to aid in understanding the narrative discussions and illustrations included in this budget document and the terminology generally used in governmental accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and budgeting. Accountability The state of being obliged to explain one's actions, to justify what one does. Accountability requires a government to answer to its citizenry to justify the raising of public resources and the purposes for which they are used. Accounting System The methods and records established to identify, assemble, analyze, classify, record, and report a government's transactions and to maintain accountability for the related assets and liabilities. Accrual Basis of Accounting The accounting of the financial effects of transactions, events, and interfund activities when they occur, regardless of when cash is received or paid. Audit A systematic collection of the sufficient, competent evidential matter needed to attest to the fairness of management's assertions in the financial statements or to evaluate whether management has efficiently and effectively carried out its responsibilities. The auditor obtains this evidential matter through inspection, observation, inquiries, and confirmations with third parties. Balanced Budget The identification of revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances to fund operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses on an annual basis. Basis of Accounting A term used to refer to when the effects of transactions or events are recognized for financial reporting purposes. For example, the timing of recognition can be when the transaction or event occurs (accrual basis) or when cash is received or paid (cash basis). Bond A written promise to pay a specified sum of money (face or principal amount) at a specified date or dates in the future (maturity date), together with periodic interest at a specified rate. Bonds are primarily used to finance capital projects. Budget A plan of financial activity for a specified period indicating all planned revenues and expenditures for the budget period. Annual budgets are usually required by law and are essential to sound financial management. The Commission prepares an annual budget that is applicable to a single fiscal year. Budgetary Control The control or management of a government in accordance with an approved budget to keep expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. Budget Document The instrument used by the budget -making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the appropriating governing body. Capital Outlay Expenditures resulting in the acquisition of or addition to the government's capital assets or assets to be transferred to Caltrans, such as highway projects. Capital Project A long-term strategic project requiring relatively large sums of revenues, accumulated reserves, and/or financing to acquire, develop, construct, improve, and/or maintain a capital asset such as land, buildings, and infrastructure. Capital Projects Fund A governmental fund type created to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital projects. The Commission has two capital projects funds for Commercial Paper and Sales Tax Bonds to account for debt proceeds from 2009 Measure A commercial paper notes and sales tax revenue bonds related to highway, commuter rail, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects. Commercial Paper An unsecured short-term promissory note issued primarily by corporations with maturities ranging from two to 270 days. The credit risk of almost all commercial paper is rated by a rating service. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report A financial report that encompasses all funds of the government. In the financial section of the CAFR are the basic financial statements and required supplementary information as well as combining and individual fund financial statements, as necessary. The CAFR also contains introductory information and statistical data. Current Financial Resources Measurement Focus A measurement focuses that reports on the near -term or current inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable financial resources. This focus is unique to accounting and financial reporting for state and local governments and is used for reporting the financial position and results of operations of governmental funds. Debt An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and services. Debts of governments include bonds, time warrants, and notes. Debt Coverage Ratio The ratio of pledged revenues to related debt service for a given year. Debt Limit The maximum amount of outstanding gross or net debt legally permitted. Debt Proceeds The difference between the face amount of debt and the issuance discount or the sum of the face amount and the issuance premium. Debt proceeds differ from cash receipts to the extent issuance costs, such as underwriters' fees, are withheld by the underwriter. Debt Service Fund A governmental fund type created to account for the accumulation of resources for and payment of general long-term debt principal and interest. The Commission has one debt service fund for its sales tax revenue bonds. Expenditures Represents decreases in net financial resources on the transfer of property or services for acquiring an asset, service, or settling a loss. Financial Advisor In the context of the issuance of debt, a consultant who advises the issuer on any of a variety of matters related to the issuance. The financial advisor sometimes also is referred to as the fiscal consultant. Financial Audit An audit made to provide independent assurance whether the financial statements of a government are presented fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Financial Resources Resources that are or will become available for spending and include cash, resources ordinarily expected to be converted to cash such as receivables, inventory, and prepaid assets. Fiscal Year For the Commission, the 12-month period that begins July 1 and ends June 30 of the designated fiscal or operating year for accounting and budgeting purposes. Fund A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts in which cash and other financial resources, all related liabilities, and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, are recorded and segregated to carry on specific activities or attain certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. Fund Balance The excess of a governmental fund's assets over its liabilities. Fund Type Any one of eleven classifications into which all funds are categorized in governmental accounting. Governmental fund types include general, special revenue, debt service, capital projects, and permanent funds. Proprietary fund types include enterprise and internal service funds. Fiduciary fund types include pension trust, investment trust, and private -purpose trust funds and agency funds. GASB 34 Statement No. 34 issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board that was implemented by the Commission in FY 2001/02. GASB 34 established new financial reporting standards for state and local governments. Under the new financial reporting model, governmental financial statements include basic financial statements that present both government -wide and fund financial statements and required supplementary information, including Management's Discussion and Analysis. GASB 45 Statement No. 45, Accounting for Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB), issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board implemented by the Commission in FY 2007/08. GASB 45 requires recognition of postretirement health care costs on an accrual basis over a period approximating the employees' years of service and to provide information about actuarial accrued liabilities associated with these benefits and whether and to what extent progress is being made in funding the plan. General Fund The governmental fund type used to account for all financial resources, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. General Ledger A record containing the accounts needed to reflect the financial position and the results of operations of a government. In double -entry bookkeeping, debit balances equal the credit balances in the general ledger. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Minimum standards and guidelines for financial accounting and reporting. GAAP encompasses the conventions, rules, and procedures that serve as the norm for the fair presentation of financial statements. The GASB is the primary authoritative accounting and financial reporting standard -setting body on the application of GAAP to state and local governments. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) Rules and procedures established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for the conduct of a financial audit. There are ten basic GAAS, classified into three broad categories: general standards, standards of fieldwork, and standards of reporting. The Auditing Standards Board of the AICPA publishes Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS) and related interpretations to comment and expand upon these basic standards. Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) Standards established by the General Accounting Office (GAO) in its publication, Government Auditing Standards, for the conduct and reporting of both financial and performance audits in the public sector. GAGAS set forth general standards applicable to both types of audits and separate standards of fieldwork and reporting for financial and performance audits. The GAGAS standards of fieldwork and reporting for financial audits incorporate and build upon GAAS. Governmental Funds Funds generally used to account for tax -supported activities. The Commission's governmental funds are comprised of general, special revenue, debt service, and capital projects funds. Grant A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function or program. Independent Auditor An auditor meeting the independence criteria set forth in GAAS and GAGAS. Internal Audit An independent appraisal of the diverse operations and controls within a government entity to determine whether acceptable policies and procedures are followed, established standards are met, resources are used efficiently and economically, and the organization's objectives are being achieved. The term covers all forms of appraisal of activities undertaken by auditors working for and within an organization. Internal Control Policies and procedures established to provide reasonable assurance that specific government objectives will be achieved. Joint Venture A legal entity or other organization resulting from a contractual agreement and that is owned, operated, or governed by two or more participants as a separate and specific activity for the benefit of the public or service recipients and in which the government retains an ongoing financial interest or ongoing financial responsibility. The Commission is a member agency of Metrolink. Legal Level of Budgetary Control The level at which a government's management may not reallocate resources without special approval from the legislative body. Loans Receivable An asset account reflecting amounts loaned to individuals or organizations external to the Commission, including notes taken as security for such loans. Measurement Focus The objective of a measurement that is what is being expressed in reporting a government's financial performance and position. A particular measurement focus considers not only which resources are measured (financial or economic), but also when the effects of transactions or events involving those resources are recognized (basis of accounting). The measurement focus of the Commission's government - wide and fiduciary fund financial statements is economic resources, whereas the measurement focus of governmental fund financial statements is current financial resources. Modified Accrual Basis The accrual basis of accounting adapted to the governmental funds' measurement focus according to which revenues and other financial resource increments (e.g., bond issue proceeds) are recognized when they become susceptible to accrual, that is when they become both "measurable" and "available to finance expenditures of the current period." Expenditures are recognized when the fund liability is incurred except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt and certain similar accrued obligations when due. The Commission's governmental funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Other Financing Sources Amounts classified separately from revenues to avoid distorting revenue trends that represent an increase in current financial resources. Other financing sources generally include general long-term debt proceeds, amounts equal to the present value of minimum lease payments arising from capital leases, proceeds from the sale of capital assets, and transfers in. Other Financing Uses Amounts classified separately from expenditures to avoid distorting expenditure trends and represent a decrease in current financial resources. Other financing uses generally include transfers out and the amount of refunding bond proceeds deposited with the escrow agent. Overhead Indirect costs that cannot be specifically associated with a given service, program, or department and thus, cannot be clearly associated with a particular functional category. Principal In the context of bonds other than deep -discount debt, the face value or par value of a bond or issue of bonds payable on stated dates of maturity. Program Group activities, operations, or organizational units directed to attaining specific purposes or objectives. Program Budget A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on the functions or activities of a government rather than to specific items of cost or to specific departments. Purchase Order A document authorizing the delivery of specified merchandise or the rendering of certain services and the making of a charge for them. Refunding Bonds Bonds issued to retire bonds already outstanding. The proceeds of refunding bonds may be used to repay the previously issued debt (current refunding) or to be placed with an escrow agent and invested until used to pay principal and interest on old debt at a future date (advance refunding). Reimbursement Grant A grant for which a potential recipient must first incur qualifying expenditures to be eligible. Restricted Fund Balance Those portions of fund balance which are restricted for specific purposes by third parties or enabling legislation. Special Revenue Fund A governmental fund type used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes. The Commission maintains special revenue funds for Measure A Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley; Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee; Freeway Service Patrol; Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies; State Transit Assistance; and Local Transportation Fund. Transfers All interfund transfers representing flows of assets between funds of the government without equivalent flows of assets in return and without a requirement for repayments. Trustee A fiduciary holding property on behalf of another. Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2013/14 Mk_ 1.11.4NlybmpolisWeielo Budget Adjustments (Draft to Final) RCTC FY 2013/14 Ending Fund Balance (as reported 5/8/13) Projected FY 2013 Adjustments: Decrease in investment income, operating transfers in, and debt proceeds (858,801,900) Increase in professional and support costs (20,000) Decrease in project operations, debt service, and operating transfers out 282,612,700 Budget FY 2014 Adjustments: Increase in federal, state and local reimbursements 7,684,000 Increase in investment income 63,000 Increase in operating transfers in 282,241,900 Increase in debt and TIFIA loan proceeds 716,774,000 Increase in salaries and benefits (951,400) Increase in professional and support costs (1,793,600) Increase in engineering and construction costs (2,520,000) Increase in design -build costs (25,050,000) Increase in right of way acquisition costs (48,269,000) Decrease in transit operating and capital distributions 6,934,000 Increase in special studies and TUMF regional arterial costs (307,500) Increase in debt service costs (102,535,100) Increase in operating transfers out (282,241,900) FY 2013/14 Ending Fund Balance (per final budget 6/12/13) $ 843,330,000 Fund Balance $ 869,510,800 4.4 nr. kginning Fund Balance total Estimated Revenues/Sources $ 590,821,600 1, 921, 987, 400 #Revenues 74,0E7,600 *Debt Proceeds $810,774,000 -Transfers$636,325,800 total Estimated Expenditures/Uses ...Expenditures x9,440,933 •Debt Service $135,712,300 •Tran54:15Out $636,325,800 (1,669,479,000) Pevenues/Sources over Expe nditures/Uses iknding Fund Balance FY 2013/14 252,508,400 $ 843,330,000 Funding Sources Revenues N Measure A Sales Tax ULTF Sales Tax L STA Sales Tax c-1 0 Federal reimbursements MState reimbursements c—i V) Local reimbursements CV TUMF ›— C Other revenues L1- � Investment income N Sources Debt proceeds TIFIA loan proceeds Transfers in Total Revenues/Sources $ 147,000,000 72,500,000 13,298,000 94,389,000 133,496,300 2,954,400 6,723,400 S00,000 4,026,500 700,774,000 110,000,000 636,325,800 $ 1,921,987,400 2 Funding Sources Comparison FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Percent Actual Budget Projected Budget Change Measure A Sales Tax 5134,984,300 $ 141,000,000 $141,000,000 $ 147,000,000 4% LTF Sales Tax 66,556,703 69,500,000 69,500,000 72,503,000 4% STA Sales Tax 13,487,500 14,212,500 14,212,5130 13,298,000 -6% Federal reimbursements 28,097,000 73,151,900 40,949,203 94,389,000 29% State reimbursements 21,411,300 17,917,800 21,306,500 133,496,300 645% Local reimbursements 2,008,600 2,6813,700 2,589,400 2,954,400 10% TUMF 8,116,400 7,557,300 7,268,203 6,723,400 -11% Other revenues 1,430,100 882,800 493,5130 500,000 -43% Investment income 4,30E1,300 7,265,900 3,986,300 4,026,500 -45% Total Revenues 280,400,200 334,176,900 301,305,600 474,887,600 42% Debt proceeds 40,000,000 1,220,172,000 80,000,000 700,774,000 -43% TIFIA loan proceeds 110,000,000 N/A Transfers in 123,977,200 328,118,600 125,536,100 636,325,800 94% Total Revenues/Sources $444,377,400 $1,882,467,500 $506,841,700 $1,921,987,400 2% Summary of Uses RGTC x Management Services 'Et RcTe Management Services Expenditures/Uses FY2011J32 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2073/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Executive Management $ 214,700 $ 283,200 $ 237,800 Administration 1,238,100 1,502,200 1,196,000 Legislative Affairs and Communications 927,900 1,244,300 953,200 Finance 5,333,900 4,999,500 4,547,000 Debt Service 25,200 - - Total Expenditures 7,739,800 8,029,200 6,934,000 8,935,400 Transfers Out 10,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Total Management Services $ 17,739,800 $ 13,029,200 $ 11,934,000 $ 13,585,400 E'en:Eye Management 3% • Adnini•51.=.pripn 22% tesiFlative Affairs and Communications 14% finautet 61% $ 258,900 1,865,400 1,248,400 5,212,700 Regional Programs RCM Regional Programs Expenditures/Uses FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Planning and Programming Services $ 3,399,900 $ 4,994,100 $ 3,538,600 $ 5,845,000 Rail Maintenance and Operations 20,202,600 14,553,300 11,564,300 15,485,600 Public and Specialized Transit 53,158,100 84,811,200 59,406,500 106,803,900 Commuter Assistance 3,157,600 4,038,800 4,197,400 4,411,700 Motorist Assistance 3,846,300 4,848,000 4,727,600 5,464,600 Total Expenditures Transfers Out Total Regional Programs Planning and Programming 5% Rail Maintenance and Operations 11% 83,764,500 113,245,400 83,434,400 198,010,800 16,167,100 21,105,200 19,809,0C° 15,369,Z00 $ 99,931,600 $ 134,350,600 $ 103,243,400 $ 153,380,000 Public and Specialized Transit 77% Commuter Assistance 3% Motorist Assistante 4% s Capital Program Uses RCTC Nom DanIS Capital Program Expenditures/Uses FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Salaries and benefits $ 2,26.9,400 $ 3,113,100 $ 2,934,200 $ 3,339,800 Professional costs 5,057,500 7,692,500 7,321,700 19,260,400 Support costs 300,700, 597,100 302,900 S07,300 Projects and operations: Program operations 5,416,600 11,852,300 7,431,800 12,197,600 Engineering 21,366,500 27,892,500 16,540,900 20,355,000 Construction 27,451,200 125,934,100 61,628,030 240,968,400 Design build 16,285,700 29,050,000 29,050,000 217,750,000 Right of way and land 53,728,100 112,246,800 64,716,400 164,707,800 Local streets and roads 40,127,900 42,129,000 42,129,000 43,825,900 Regional arterials 8,962,700 16,455,400 20,500,400 25,157,500 Other 209,200 515,000 148,300 2,375,000 Debt service 61,507,400 143,413,000 22,990,600 135,712,300 Total Expenditures 242,681,900 520,890,800 275,694,200 886,557,000 Transfers out 97,810,100 302,013,400 100,727,100 615,956,600 Total Capital Project Development 8, Delivery 5340,492,000 $ 822,904,200 $ 376,421,300 $1,502,513,600 -111111.11111111111-, Capital Projects & Operations ExpendituresRCTC Projects and Operations • 49% Professional costs Salaries and benefits 1% f/# Weir build Ja% Right of way Ind land 23% lepul nrdaatsad,a.sit�s LWaia W r J% Capita) Project Expenditure Highlights SR-91 HOV Lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 SR-91, I-15 and 1-215 Corridor Improvements FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Personnel $ 6,072,600 $ 6,971,100 $ 6,960,200 $ 7,949,400 Professional 11,632,200 14,676,700 13,360,700 26,675,500 Support 3,728,100 5,333,300 4,586,900 5,593,300 Projects and operations 251,011,000 471,323,600 317,959,000 856,426,500 Capital outlay 209,700 447,700 205,200 796,200 Debt service 61,532,600 143,413,000 22,990,600 135,712,300 Total Expenditures 334,186,200 642,165,400 366,062,600 1,033,153,200 Transfers out 123,977,200 328,118600 125,536,100 636325,800 Total Expenditures/Uses $458,163,400 $ 970,284,000 $491,598,700 $1,669,479,000 Personnel, Professional, Support, and Capital Outlay Expenditures 6 Personnel Commission Action May 8, 2013 Addition of Four Positions • Planning & Programming Director • Human Resources Administrator • Capital Projects Manager • Facilities Administrator Market Equity Adjustments • Market adjustments needed in 16 positions to meet the minimum salary range. • Remain competitive in Commission's labor market. Pension Reform — Resolution No. 13-005 • Employees' contribution of 3%toward normal pension costs, offset by corresponding cost of living adjustment. RCM Performance Rased Merit Increases • Provide a pool not to exceed 3% for merit increases based on performance. Measure A Management Services � 14 N ext Ste ps Continue monitoring revenues Measure A administrative management services salaries and benefits Funding needs for projects and transit operators ROTC Sales tax and TUMF revenue trends Timeliness of federal and state reimbursements Close public hearing and adopt budget Review the final budget draft, close the public hearing, and adopt the final budget 8 REVISION TO AGENDA ITEM 7 Additions are noted by Bold Italics, Deletions are noted by S ket-Iffeugh RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: William Von Klug, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Four Three Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permancnt Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in All or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102 270 010; 1 17-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 11 Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a1 The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b1 The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c1 The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-006, 13 007, 13-010, and 13-01 1, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Pcrmancnt Acccss Eascmcnt, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102 270 010, 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Agenda Item 7 Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP►, which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is being asked to consider the adoption of four resolutions of necessity declaring its intent to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access weemcnt, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in all or in portions of certain real property, by eminent domain, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. (APNs) 102-020-044; 102 270 010; 1 17-270-002; 1 15-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; and for the widening, maintenance, and operational improvements of SR-91 CIP. The immediate need for the property acquisitions is to proceed with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. The acquisitions are required for and will benefit the community by providing additional lanes to ease current traffic congestion along the SR-91 through the city of Corona in Riverside County, California. Preliminary title reports and/or litigation guarantees were obtained from Lawyers Title Insurance Company to confirm and identify the record owners of the parcels affected by the Project. The Commission then served the affected property owners with notices of the Commission's decision to appraise the property. The Commission had the properties appraised and made offers to the record owners. Negotiations were unsuccessful for the purchase of the interests necessary for the SR-91 CIP. The adoption of resolutions of necessity for the interests will not prevent negotiations from continuing. Since an agreement has not been reached with the owners of record, it may be necessary to acquire the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access cvscmcnt, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests described in the attachments by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is accomplished by the Commission's adoption of resolutions of necessity for the affected property. Description of Property to be Acquired 1) APN 102-020-044, the larger parcel, is owned by the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona. The property is a vacant lot Located on the south side of Wardlow Road, approximately 0.25 miles east of Research Drive, in the city of Corona, California. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and Agenda Item 7 temporary construction easement interests in portions of the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-006. 2) /LPN 102 270 010 is owned by Com-Ha -Dynasty Suites, Inc., a California corporation. The site address of the property is 1805 West 6'h Street, Corona, California. The property is impHave-d• with a hotel and comprises a i-aHd-af E'c^rv,-jost-anav rvre-ueFe,---14-is-nee$S'.sury-ce-ue-qa;re-the-eR tFFe-1 to accommodate relocation of the 6th and Maple Strccts onramp to c\astbound SR 91. The legal description and map of the property to bo a��;�,o.J ., ..h�h+t-te-�e�ei�•f�.,., AI.,. 1 3) APN 1 17-270-002, is owned by Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez. The property comprises a land area of approximately 30,056 square feet and is improved with a truck driving school. The site address of the property is 107 N. Joy Street, Corona, California. It is necessary to acquire the entire parcel to accommodate the realignment of Joy and Pearl Streets near the 91 /15 interchange. The legal description and map of the property to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-010. 4) APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, the larger parcel, are owned by Pearl Street Properties, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. The property comprises a land area of approximately 8.18 acres. The site address of the property is 105 and 211 Pearl Street, Corona, California. The property is improved with warehouse structures. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission to acquire a fee portion of the larger parcel, a well as a permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-01 1. Project Description The SR-91 CIP is generally described as extending the existing 91 Express Lanes into Riverside County for a distance of approximately eight miles; the addition of a general purpose lane in each direction from the 71 /91 interchange to 1-15, the improvement of five local interchanges within the city of Corona and the addition of auxiliary lanes and other operational improvements throughtout the project limits. Agenda Item 7 DISCUSS/ON: Hearings and Required Findings The action requested of the Commission at the conclusion of this hearing is the adoption of resolutions of necessity, authorizing the acquisition of real property interests by eminent domain. The property owners are: 1) Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona, APN 102-020-044 — fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests. 2) Corona Dynasty Suites, mac., -A-PN 1-0-2 270 01-0• full acquisition in fee. 3) Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, APN 117-270-002 - full acquisition in fee. 4) Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 — part acquisition in fee, permanent wall footing easement, permancnt acccss easemcnt, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests. The properties are further identified in the legal definitions, descriptions, and depictions attached to the respective resolution. California eminent domain law provides that a public entity may not commence with eminent domain proceedings until its governing body has adopted a resolution of necessity, which resolution may only be adopted after the governing body has given each party with an interest in the affected property, or their representatives, a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. Notices of the hearing were sent by first class mail to the property owners, and stated the Commission's intent to consider the adoption of resolutions, the right of the property owners to appear and be heard on these issues, and that failure to file a written request to appear would result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission scheduled this hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date of notice was mailed may appear and be Agenda Item 7 heard. The Commission's legal counsel mailed the required notices to the property owners, on April 26, 2013, and May 24, 2013, in accordance with the California Code of Civil Procedure, section 1245.235. The property owners were also invited to meet with Commission and Caltrans staff to address any concerns the property owners may have with the design of the project in the manner proposed and the necessity of the acquisition. The four required findings are addressed as follows: 1) Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proposed Project The acquisition of the properties is necessary to construct the SR-91 CIP, which will reduce traffic congestion and enhance safety, as well as provide an alternative means of transportation along the SR-91 corridor and includes connections to 1-15 in Riverside County. The SR-91 CIP includes adding general purpose lanes and extending tolled express lanes. 2) The Project is Planned or Located in a Manner that will be Most Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury A thorough analysis was conducted to find the single best location for this project. Environmental analyses and findings indicate that these sites uniquely satisfy the engineering, public health, and environmental issues, and these locations are the most compatible with the greatest public good. These locations will result in the least private injury. 3) The Property Sought to be Acquired is Necessary for the Proposed Project As described above, a careful analysis was performed regarding these locations and what property and property rights were needed, and these parcels meet all the desired characteristics for the construction of the improvements for the project. 4) The Offer of Just Compensation has been Made Appraisals were prepared by appraisal firms Lidgard and Associates and Kiley Company, to establish the fair market value of the real property the Commission is seeking to acquire from the interest owned by the property owners identified herein. Review appraisals were prepared by Hennessey & Hennessey LLC. Fixture and Equipment Appraisals were prepared by Hodges Lacey & Associates, LLC and Desmond, Marcell° & Amster. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the property interests, based on the approved appraisals, as required by Section 7267.2 Agenda Item 7 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the interests sought through eminent domain, to ensure the property will be available to meet the time frames associated with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. Environmental Analysis Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act has been satisfied by Caltrans' certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) in its role as lead agency on August 8, 2012, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission's subsequent consideration of that certified EIR in its role as a responsible agency on November 14, 2012. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Notice of Public Hearing Notices of Hearing to Property Owners were mailed on April 26, 2013 to the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona; Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc.; Pearl Street Properties, LLC; and on May 24, 2013, to Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, the owners of record. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 13-006 2) Resolution No. 13 007 3) Resolution No. 13-010 4) Resolution No. 13-01 1 Agenda Item 7 RESOLUTION NO. 13-011 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, —PERMANENT —ACCESS CACCIIAENTPERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, AND 117-270-013, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent eeeess-easem7ent7 permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is .a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," . also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to, reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove, at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limited to sewers, water, electrical systems and communication systems, consisting wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholds, and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in, under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in 17336M2 100\7888203.1 FY14IRIT A. PA[8F 4 connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 173:46.02100\7 88203.1 FYFIIRIT 0_ DAMP 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT 'Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81'40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°40'38" West 19.65 feet continuing along said general southerly line to the beginning of a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 15.87 feet through a central angle of 36°21'56"; thence South 81°26'22" East 29.38 feet to a point on said westerly line, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 52°17'05" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle .of 01°55'52" to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 130 square feet See Exhibit `AT attached hereto and made apart hereof. PALPTG0105011SURVEY\LEGALS122275, APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-1-FeeAocx Pagel of 10/17/2012 FYFIIRIT A_ PAAF 3 1 PSOMAS 2 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 3 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to 4 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 5 6 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 7 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 8 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 9 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 10 11 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 15 16 elest4 -/ 17 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG010501kSURVEYlLEGALS122275 APN 117-270-007kLegals\22275-1-Fee.docx Page 2 of 2 10/17/2012 F]INIRIT A_ PAC= A EXI-IIB T A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 130 SO. FT. 117-270-007. SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 1"-270_004 Q. 0 1` ` �S.. F. R,,q, Lu �19'�0 ,� cr p-02T 115 060-016 ., 1-•_ f -- I °cL, z 1 LIJ DOC, NO. 2006-0565691 O.R. PCL 1 a 11 7-270-006 I ' _ --------- 6. S 63/ab ____ I 212./4 POB I;'�` i T P0B y 365 � SHEET 2 � I 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING ,li., LEGEND "' POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( } Title to State j I I l I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on cC5 1983(2007.00) zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5 FEE ACOUISlTIO>l -- distances. All distances are in feet unless otherv,iise noted. - =. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Kutten Centre °rive, Ste. 200 Sante Ana Co1,fornto 9270 f71d4751-7373s£3ftbSt S-e8e3 {f5x! DATE: 06-15-12 REV,: 10-17-12 EA: 0F540 FAs:: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM - SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I U 91 �-y cc Tr , 9 1 [ FYNIRIT A_ Pat= A EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL.# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP 130 SOS T, 117-27Q-QQ7 1 r W ct- � -, kJ I t L _ 3 00 9.21 ' S44 °q t d�36c _ R�/5'87, Jo 3 M N O N. o M 8 W(R) 2i 'S6 � ° ' A1"w S� 0 AZ oho° ,,.,; 81 °26 � s SOUTH RJ VERSI DE LAND AND WATER DoMPANY MS' 9/6 gal p. PDt 2 DUD, NU„ 2JJb�JJ���i671 J. � , '-; �, 0 t`) �\ D ,9� ,_a D �� cP_ � (b �o —gyp -5� 1 _ `'� O -. "22"Est 5 `'� 3e+� 4-010 -- 41R_ 55'S2 _ram 06 3' N to .65' L`6.965 1 81 4p•38„ W N81 °40,38 W rPoB 212.1 q �Ropas�a Raw ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 2°Ak , LEGEND POB Indicotes Point TPOB Indicates True (R) Indicates Radial Of Beginning Point Of Beginning Bearing C ) Title to State 1 I 1 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES FEET 2 2 2 7 5 -1 FEE AC011151T10N E }lummummummq Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 60 0 10 20 40 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 t0.,tton Centre Drive Ste. 100 0tto s35-87eiS•737i(7tets5e03 teoxl DATE: 6-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PIS SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS g RIV 91 6.9 , - 2 FYIIIRIT 0_ POrF R P S 3 4 ! Ca'trans Parcel No. 22275-2 5 f Fee Acquisition 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 1.0 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 ! 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 191.5, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside Cc:nutty, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said I 17 ; point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 1.76.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 90 02°51'28"; thence South 81°26'22" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave I 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41'20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve 25 339.28 feet through a central angle of 06°51'08" to the beginning of a non -tangent curve 26 concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 27 South 14°40'09" Fast; thence easterly along said curve 48.35 feet through a central angle i 28 01'00'58'35" to the general easterly line of said Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 29 73.38 feet alonYthe general easterly line of said Parcel 4 to the southeasterly corner 30 thereof and the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius 31 of 1,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 18°23'1.6" East; thence westerly EXHIBIT `Bl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION M=2PTG010501\SURvL-YILEGALS122275_APN_117-270-f 5_.117-270-013__.11.5-060-013`Legals`22275-2-FEE.doex 6/712013 Page 1 of 2 FWBURIT A_ PAAF 7 1 along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4 and along said curve 199.21 feet through a central angle of 05°51'11" to the most southerly comer thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; thence South 41 ° 19'57" East 15.92 feet along said Northeasterly line to the most easterly corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78'5824" West 131.00 feet to the most easterly corner at said Parcel 1, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 08'20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses; 1) along said curve 581.97 feet through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40' 38" West 123.15 feet to the Point of Beginning. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Containing 41,255 square feet. 13 14 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 15 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 16 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 17 18 j See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made a part .hereof.. 19 20 t The distances describedherein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 21 System of 1983, Lone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 22 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 23 E combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 24 25 26 27 Prepared under the direction of 28 29 30 31 Brian. E. Bullock, PI,S 5260 Date 1.0.`,2PTG01050IvSLRVEY.LT'(;ALSV22275 APN lf'270-005 17-270-0I3 1j5-060-073Teeah',22275-2-IsEE.docx 617,001.3 Page 2 6172 FX411RIT A_ PAC4F R EXHI IT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE. PEARL STREET PROP, 41,255 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 `-__-SHEET i J 2 1 OD,I l SHEET INDEX SHEET 4 SHEET 5 I i I 3 H 7-270-0031 7 i _i i 1 "± --I--004 o I; a t. I i I lIc 1, 1: �, _ IQ t- _ 777_27p` _ `- SHEET PSI_, (A e To - - _�� � I �s R f-_- (-''`=`- �„• R.R. I ,,9_ CIO, 2006-05E�5�9II 0,R.. I POL : ) I ;�_�, I I 63/, b - ----------- ---- I - - _ -�_ '-_�_ ` �C- ---- � ,, - ,, RIVERSIDE _ 115-060-016 I I --- , Pei L-` `— __ -- E I I �y -- t-2. I „7-z7o-oo6 I ---------------------- _--- P 0 B� FREEWAY 2 365 ROUTE 91 y j T 360 ROUTE 91 /RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 1 C/L STATIONING LEGEND PO4 Indicates TPOB ,indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing State Prohibited ( ) Title to 11 1 1 1 Access NOTES FEET 2 FEE 10v 200 _ 7 5 -� ACQUISITION - fy� Coordinates and bearings are on cc5 1983(200/.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0,99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. �W` 0 COO a0o PREPARED BY: d a ,`.a .. 'rs .., .if, s = t=:,r. DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO, TOTAL SHEETS 8 L RIV 91 6.9 5 FYMIRIT e_ PeAF Q EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. L11,255 SO. FT. ? 1 5.- 60-01 3 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 ' FOR, SnUTH W 4 4, cc t 7 � f �ti a w Q.r � \ � ---- o o t �j V - -_.'- :i—�� PROPOSED R/W I_OT RI AND l�lr� q I'lIJ' -- _/� I -- �� -� o . o P ;0 o rn c ROUTE �,JR�:J ;7R 3; Eli 001< / 3. } COMPANY` ��7 //; f10C, No, 05�5�91 — — — — — — [102° 51 '28" R=1 76.53' !=8.81---- S81 °26.22"E _ 5 7.2 2 -- _ 1-� �- �- — �w15°25`1G" EXISTING R/W 200 -- 3,R, — — - -- _ + 6 r .21 20R SY C T l Oil 30 ,�v ; f ��a �A;'�HO -i SOFIR N 1r E 11 a } PrL, 1 Drip, NO, 2006�- — — — 0-5. 5�9i 0,R, -- l S� /'a6 1 .. �.3 j l -— — — — R=2851.00' L=767,34' rO w w In - N81 °40'38"W POB 1 23.1 5' FREEWAY °� P (-) V 91 RIVERSIDE ��J- 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE C/� STATIONING j 3 6 0 LEGEND POB Indicates TPOB Indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State J I lit Arc,-ss Prohibited NOTES FFET 2 2, 7 - Fr ACQUISITIC,ti �- Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1963(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet ;Iniess otherwise noted. 15v — O 26 S3 100 PREPARED BY: c - ., r, _.. DATE: 06-15-12 REV.:06-07--13 EA: OF540 Fik#: DISTRICT COUNTY - r ROUTE SWEET PM !SHEET 10. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV j 91 '6.9 2 FYNIRIT A_ PIMP in EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE - PEARL STREET PROP. 41,255 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 CV F— w w w w FOR, GECT I ON 30 T,38„; R,6W, RANCHO EL Si BRAN T r 'SAS I /9 U `>- Q=15°25'16" n=16°40'20" N81 °40'38"W 123.15' PC1 , I DOC a NO, 2006- 0565691 0, R. PROPOSED R/W R=2851 .00' R=2000.00' EXISTING R/W/ L=581.97' ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearina (----) Title to State 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited 2 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 363 Q w w Cr) w w NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on %CS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275®2 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 25 50 100 ,50 PREPARED BY: ?'73!(71.1it"145-as63 (Fox) DATE: 06-1 5-12 DISTRICT 8 REV,:06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: COUNTY R I '. ROUTE _)1 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 3 TOTAL SHEETS FYMIRIT A_ PACW 44 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 1.,255 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 w w w w POR , SECTION 30 T, 35 R.8111, RAf 1CHn EL SOORAN,T E Mg 118 PCL , 1 OOC. NO, 2008 05656 9 J 0 R . , I PROPOSED R/W 0-16° 40120" 406° 38' 56„Ei R)- NQ1°20 45 NIv' 18.211 .0 ' 7 . 4` '785�1 0 �� , 6 _ ROTE 365 R ,2000 . LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True. Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ) Title to State t Access Prohibited J C L ., 3 PDOC, NO. 2006- -- 05631-)91,MR, P 00C. NO, 200A-- -06° 51 f 08, i h L;=5a1.97 0` 508° 20' lR} �'ST�"� ICE �REE��. '91RIVERS POR , LOT, 12-A- ASSESSOR'S MAP NO, 31 A1' S 1 /42-43 T R,2831'p°/' , ui339,28 ,' 131,00• "= 1478°58'244 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING V) E- LU W w w v7 NOTES Coordinates and bearings fire on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain around distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: nno, GDr;vn ar' - ti2 07 51.7177 ei5.;5 s188 rx? DATE: 06-15-2012 REV.: 06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICTi!COUNTY ROUTF_1 SHEET PM u R1V 91 I 6.9 SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 4 5 FICHIRIT A_ PIMP 17 EXHIBIT B2 A. T & SoF, R.R. R� A=00°58'35" R=2837.00' L=4803r,` S15°38'45''E (R) S13°30'03"E (R) ?N /WI l PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP, 41,255 SOo FT. 115-060-013 v15 1 1 I-210-005 & 01 I_.., r DOG.. No, 200b- 0565691 J,R, -- 1 31 , 00 '�,-• -� s, N78°58'24 'W 's9'° 22275- r `9� J9s ROU� G cj1 I�T, !�1 �.sSrJR ` v (11Jr'1R" 1\1J 3 I !1 I 1 19 -4)3 F LEGEND ROB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State ! 1 1 1 I Access Prohibited 9A 1 R a) a; , N ) N rn N 0 O) 0 R 11 5-060-01 5 3'( ° \ ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS, 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 2 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION 100 PREPARED BY: DATE:06-15-12 REV.:06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT 8 i COUNTY ROUTE! SHEET PM SHEET NO TOTAL SHEETS FXNIRIT A_ PAR: 41 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `CV LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-3 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40' 38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 696 feet through a central angle of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°26'22" West 29.38 feet to a point on the general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03°07'25" to the True Point of Beginning. PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275_APN 117-270-007\Legals122275-3-PE,docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 FYNIRIT A_ PACIF �d PS CAMAS 1 Containing 235 square feet. 2 3 See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on Califomia Coordinate 6 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 7 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 9 10 11 Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 15 6Stati /LY 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG0105011SURVEYTEGALS122275_APN 117-270-007Tegals122275-3-PE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/ 17/2012 - FY411RIT A_ PA1iF �5 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275--3 E SMT PEARL STREET PROP. 235 SO. F T . 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 DOB, NO, 006-- 0565691 0,R FOL., J R s' 63/66 ----- N81'4038"W 212.14' SHEET 2 j 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing (--- } Title to State 11 I I l Access Prohibited 1115-060-016 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASE ENT FEPT 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: O A 3 14,ofto,n Centre Greve Ste. 260 9,707 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 F Att: DISTRICT COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 6.9 i i 2 FXFIIRIT A_ PA(:F 9R EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR I AREA A P N 22275-3 IESMT PEARL STREET PROP i 235 SO.FT. 117-270-007 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH ' I C1 25.00' 24°40'57" 10.77' III �--__ C2 206.53' 03°07'25" 11.26' j RADIAL DATA 1 BEARING A,,,� LR� R1 569°22'14"W W o q2 0 (J) Fel 2 � w DOC .. NO, 2JJ�~- 05(:)5 J l O , R . a ti , FOR , I_OT 3 y F i_OCI‹ 73 ! �'oo � SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND co z \ �� AND WATER GOMPAN`>✓ 0 a=89°57 ,74r, __ — �"cP_ �0 ��"� R,=25.00' E+'7 `006, —�•y���4 — `� O -� .� - - 39.27 S81 ° ::A' 22„� �`Sv'_S C7 ,,,,..28.54, G'L o 1�eG, NB,, °r 1cD "_ ►. �.� � 7 9.65' v 41707 ° Jr. 5, �+e R=,206 53-' — -- L.7--6.96 I 22275 - PN81 °40,38„W N81 °40,38°,w � 272 pig 7.1 PROPOSED Riw LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( ) Title to State 91 i l 1 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 22 2 - PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances_ Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: 3',= Cen4re 1'rlve Ste. '<00 014) ano,rm torso -a n7 (7+a 53-7,." 1( 4i545 8e83 £�Gni DATE: 6-15--12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA:OF540 FAa: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS v 8 R I V 91 �3 6.9 2 FY1111RIT A_ PACiF 47 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `DI' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-4 Permanent Wall Footink Easement APN 117-270-005 & 013 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 02°51'28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet through a central angle of 04°34'41' ; thence South 81 °26'22" East 68.83 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37'; thence South 41°19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°51'38" East; thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 81'26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 6,614 square feet. P:\2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGAL.S122275_APAi_t 17-270-005 anti 013 115-060-013 and 015i1.ega1s122275-4-PE.docx 10/9/2012 Page 1 of 2 FIMIRIT A_ PAriF 151 PS OMAS See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 ( Prepared under the direction of 9 10 11 2:-/5:e.e144 12 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /o-69--oZ Date P:12PTG010501\SURVEY?LEGALS122275 _ APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015\legals\22275.4-PE.docx 10/9/2012 _ Page 2 of 2 FYNIRIT 0_ P06AF 1Q EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 117-270-003 117-270-006i 360 SHEET INDEX SHEET 3 SHEET 4 . R, revrtit n--trnT ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Beoring ( } Title to State 1 I 1 11 Access Prohibited IS 060-016 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and totioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: O A 5 3 Ru9ton r±ntrt tir+vR Ste.. 200 Santa Ara, Cotrf rain 92707 DATE: 06-15--12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAX: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM !SHEET NO. h TOTAL SHEETS 4 FYFIIRIT 0_ POPF 911 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL.STREET PROP. 6614 SO.ET. 117-270-005 & Ot3 POR , SECTION 30 POR. LOT 3; 2LOCK 73 T,3S,; R.6W. SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO W I AND WATER COMPANY EL SOSRANTE W I Mrd 9/6 MP IlB ( rPOR, PCL, 2 PCL, 1 -../ I DOG. NO. 2006- DOC , NO, 2006- Q 1 0565691 O,R. � 056569.1 O.R. --__ I R,S, 63166 -- c-C S45°24'51"W(R).W_ �p S40° 50' 1 0"W(R) L 1 - - -- _ _ _ IL • ^+■■wt�7 �. -�-- 6=1 5° 1 8'37" R=284 .00' = Pr) /- Aii:a3 . PROPOSED R/W - C.'� N81°40'38"W r ik 161.21 C2 Cl EXISTING R/W 1°23.15' � .. N81 40'38"W TPOB � ul w Lii cn N S37°58'42"CR) POB //�.��yr�+� CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE C1 C2 02° 51 '28" 04°34'41" t 76.53' 176.53' 8.81 ' 14.10' L 1 L2 S81 ° 26'22"E N81°26'22"W 68.83' 57.221 C3 15°25'16" 2851 .00' 767.34' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Cll.. STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TFOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 1 C Title to State. f 1 1 1_1 Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 198312007.00) ?one 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. �— �� I FEET d 25 56 744 150 PREPARED BY: SOMAS 3 Hutton Cen.t,:e Dr;ee. Ste. 2C:) 're Anp Cacti r I ?-161 (. sa 75f^�3'.3ts'TIa}445-898_ taxi DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS - 8 - I tf R I �t 91 6.9 2 1 FYNIRIT 0_ POrF 71 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# 22275--4 TITLE FSMT GRANTOR AREA PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SOFT. APN 117-270-005 & 013 ,moon, SECTION 30 T,3S,; F2.SI , RANCHO EL SOSRANTE MB 1 /2 (V ©=15° 1 8'37" A=1 5°25'16" 1 R,S, PROPOSED R/W PGL , 1 DOC,• N0. 2006- .566691 O,R,- =16°40'20" R=2000.00' w N81 °40'384 Ln 123.15' LEGEND EXISTING R/W L=581 .97' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ) Title to State 1 1 I 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CGS 1983(2007.00) Zane 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. r-• FEET 0 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT 25 50 100 150 PPEPAREb BY: PSOMAS 3 Hart ton Centre Ste. 200 Sang nnc,, to?ifornlp 92707 utio?5t-71 3/(71.41545-8M (Fcx! DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: 0F540 DISTRICT 8 COUNTY R I V ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET N FA#: 0, TOTAL. SHEETS A FYNIRIT 0_ POPF 99 EXH BIT 132 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP.i6614 SO..FT, 117-270-005 & 013 PO1�, SEG"r1 ON 7 38 S E °1. 61� . r RANCHO `, ;JAL. 3,,� -' EL SOn^RANIE JJ6'. NO, 2006- 0565691 O.R. R.S. 63/66 -- PCL. 1 i --- DOO AlC). 2006-- -- 056569I 0. R. s i p03°� _- soe r — f , ram,..9.71 ^- POR. LOT. I2�A ASSESSOR S MAP ._.._ w — --- N O , 31 _ �:ANIS 1/42`43 -,_ ---00C . NO.. 2006- l . 0565691 O.R. 15`,' ,--' .6 26 , PROPOSED R/W _ ._._ r , 1_ 759.6g., ___ -- i 5° 18,,/" R Z$43 Oa a, . . ----- p 7 67 , 3 ©_15°25'1' R 2851 00, SO6 51`38„E(R1 S41 ° 1 9`57"E 1 2.1 3' N78 L,.s ten ( w tii 1_-5g1.9 58,2g1v __.--.; --� R=2000=00 t�E(R) _ 6° 401ZO S08°0 59 ExtsTtrac Riw DE FREEp,Y 9� R1VE RSI ROu' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring ( Title to State ,,,) 1 1 l 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on GCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.999974.76 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. roellommilioe.-w FEET 0 25 50 tad 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 hrutfon Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Some A+ro. Confcrnlo 52701 ,714051.7372/(71-M45-2BB3 trexi DATE:06-15-12 REV,: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA:: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RI V _ 91 � /- 6• �y �J � A _ i.. 4 . FYMIRIT A_ PArF 93 PS 4MAS EXIIIBIT `F1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-6 Permanent Utility Easement j 6 APN 115-060-013 & 015 7- 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence along the general northerly 13 line thereof the followipg two (2) courses: 1) North 77°34'12" West 140.88 feet to the 14 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 and 2) westerly along 15 said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 00°45'34" to a point thereon; thence 16 South 02°32'29" West 95.94 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave 17 northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 18 09°59'54"East; thence westerly along said curve 73.33 feet through a central angle of 19 01 °28'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing westerly along said 20 2,837.00 foot radius curve 14.82 feet through a central angle of 00°17'58"; thence North 21 39° 12'38" East 32.30 feet; thence North 51'44'48" West 248.65 feet to a point an the 22 northerly line of said Parcel 3; thence South 74°26'30" East 64.80 feet along said 23 northerly line to a point thereon; thence South 51 °44'48" East 206.79 feet; thence South 24 39°12'38" West 25.00 feet; thence North 51°44'48" West 7.50 feet; thence South 25 39°12'38" West 21.53 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 26 27 Containing 6,181 square feet. 28 29 See Exhibit `F2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 30 31 P:1.2PT.601050i1SURVEYILEGALS122275 APN_117-270-005 and 013_11.5-060-013 and 0151Legals\,22275-6-PUE,dpcx Page = of 2 10/9/2012 FICHIRIT A_ PACF 9d PS OMAS 1 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2g 29 30 31 Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 l� -D9-12 Date P:12PTG0i050DSURVEY\LEGALS122275 APN_1 i 7-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015iLegais122275.6-PUE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 FYNIRIT A_ PARF 70 R EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-6 PUE PEARL STRFET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 E 117-270-0o4 o o 1- SHEET 2 A. ro . SF' • R. R , r19_3p0-021r ti1 1,-060-016 ~ 22275 ';6 ecj JJC. W PCI , 2 - NO. 2006-0565691 U.R. \ POL. , 1 .., R,S, p�L... 3/66 I''' 1 PCL. 4 1.11/"' ( PCIB ------------ -------- ---- ------b-____- - YPOB 117-270-007 3JO 117-270-006 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY \ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L. STATIONING v LEGEND .POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring C... ) Title to State i I I i i, Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 - 6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT -- ground f-� distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 2; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: PSONAS i hurtc0 Centre 6r=ve. Sfe- 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM. SHEET NOJTOTAL SHEETS 2,3M0 Ana, cnr fprni0 42702 (7141751-2' 3201.m4s-a nN {rag) _ 8 RIV n .J1 �^ 6.9. 1 i 2 FICHIRIT 0_ PA(:F 7R EXHIBIT F2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-6 PUE PEARL STREET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 s'4°26'30-E 146.4 63J b, s . PROPOSED R/w p 16° 40R�2000.00 � 581 .9r CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00°45'34" 5779.66" 76.62' C2 01 °28'52'. 2837.00" 73.33' C3 00°17'58" 2837.00' 14.82' A. 4'402°39'10" R`5779.66" EXISTING R/W LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State ill 1 l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. A11 distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. a RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 51 3° 1 1 '22"w R2 509°59'54"E R3 508° 31 '02"E R4 508°13'04"E LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 N39°12'38"E 32.30' L2 539°12'38"W 25.00' L3 N51°44'48"w 7.50' L4 S39°12'38"w 21.53' 6 S.F. R. R. 7 -" N ct -"Nd1 M in 0 N _CD 59, C1 N77°3 14 POR. LOT, I2-A ASSESSOR ' S MAP NO, 31 Ams 1 /42- 3 FOL. 4 4:"000. NO. 2006- 0 056691 G . ,O .pp' ,R- l ° 23` SA'6 ►v731 0V 1 ,14,° S415.9257 E ARE i`�ERSID. R � R 22275-6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT 1111.1111. FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY. 3 Hutton centre Dri..ef Ste. 200 Sort° Ann, CWiforni© �270", :714+7e1-73131{714}545-68S3 4'0,0 DATE: 06-15-2012 REV.: 2; 10-09-12 EA: Of540 f Att: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIB- I 91 F,g 2 FY411RIT A_ PAIMF 97 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `GU LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-7 Temporary Construction Easement A.PN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 18.22 feet through a central angle of 05°03'17" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 28.54 feet to a point on said general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 69°22'14" West; thence northerly along said curve and said general southerly line 12.54 feet through a central angle of 28°44'54" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 21.31 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 59°49'01" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 15.89 feet through a central angle of 04°24'31 " to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 304 square feet. PA2PTG01050115URVEYILEGALS122275_APN_117-270-0071Legals'22275-7-TCE.docx Page 1 of 2 10/ 17/2012 FY411RIT A_ PAPF 9A PS OMAS 1 2 See Exhibit `G2' attached hereto and made apart hereof: 3 4 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 5 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 6 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 7 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 8 9 10 Prepared under the direction of it 12 13 V 14 e". 15 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 /047--/Z Date PA2PTG010501lSURVEYILEGALS122275_APN_i 17-270-0071Lega1s122275-7-TCE.docx Page 2 of 10/17/2012 FY411RIT A_ PARF 94 PARCEL# 22275-7 117-270-003 t LSHEET 2 360 TITLE t1,_270-00q EXHIBIT G2 GRANTOR I -AREA 304 SO. FT. SHEET INDEX 1 t 7-270-006 I _ E' S, 63/66 2:TPOBT.-1_ -_ ___ - - ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (RI Indicates Radial Bearing } Title to State I i 1 l Access Prohibited 365 APN 1 1 7 - 270- 007 115-060-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PS M S Ketton earrre Erne, Sty.-200 3zvd dhiJ. fore:1c 270 7 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: 0E540 FAIT: DISTRICT COUNTY RIV ROUTE �1 SHEE T PEA TOTAL SHEETS FYNIRIT A_ PILAF 3n EXHIBIT G2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-7 TCE PEARL STREET PROP 304 SOFT, 117-270-007 j r CURVE DATA r RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 25.00' 28°44'54" 12.54' 30' C2 206.53' 04°24'31" - 15.89' r RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 S69°22'14"W q�'W 0 R2 N81 ° 52'51 "W 4� S-1Q0 R3 559° 49'01 "W r \ PCL. 2 `rLJJ ODC i`JO 2GJ'o— 056569 J OR, -s P0 � r Q.®`�'• �' ° ': POR , LOT 3 y BLOCK 7:3 prcon o z R2 _ ! �-` � :OUTH i�J�JEr�Sl Otr�ANO ?��'�7``'9 ��i`I13 �11A��i�)�CII'yiPr��lY R�25.00.R 1R—�'o.—L'3g'21 N81 °26' 5 '��_ 2• i 1.9.65'_.. 8.223 LINE DATA �81 °40`�a' y� N81 °40'38“- r BEARING DISTANCE 27 2'1`1 --- _ L1 S81 ° 26'22"E 21 .31 ' PRdPpsED Raw LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicotes True Paint Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Baring ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE_ FREEWAY { } Tina to Stote ! I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground ' 2 — 7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEkfENT - - distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 ,d 20 40 60 PREPARED BY. 3 H41`,, Cc'Z7 Oriea, y1p. "a Scnto ana, Co�ifornia B<'7G7 o tij75t-7373.%43r? 5<5-3sta (Fax; DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: GF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL - SHEETS - 66 8 - p RIV 91 , Q o.,� F11411RIT A_ PARE 34 PS OMAS 1 EXHIBIT `Hl' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-8 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 s In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1 and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006.0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 1I 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 13 161,21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 22,91 feet through a central angle of 20 07°26'09" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along said easterly line and said curve 18.72 feet through 22 a central angle of 06°04'33" to a point thereon; thence South 81°26'22" East 83.19 feet to 23 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet; thence 24 easterly along said curve 294.53 feet through a central angle of 05°57'39"; thence North 25 59°49'50" East 46.06 feet; thence South 74°24'I5" East 73.17 feet; thence South 26 87°22'34" East 66.13 feet; thence South 02°37'26" West 10.98 feet to the beginning of a 27 non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,839.00 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 00°57'28" East; thence easterly along said curve 20.04 feet 29 through a central angle of 00°24' 16"; thence North 02°37'26" East 8.02 feet to the 30 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet, to 31 which point a radial line bears South 01 °22'25" East; thence easterly along said curve PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS\22275_APN_(17-270-005 and 013_115.060-013 and 0I AL.egals\22275-8-TC£.docx Page 1 of 2 10/92012 i111.11RIT A_ PAAF �9 PS OMAS 1 278.36 feet through a central angle of 05°38'01" to a point on the easterly line of said 2 Parcel 1; thence South 41 °19'57" East 6.07 feet along said easterly line to a point thereon, 3 said paint being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius 4 of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 07°04'21" East; thence westerly 5 along said curve 20.99 feet through a central angle of 00°25'26' ; thence South 41 °21'39" 6 East 8.50 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius 7 of 2,843.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°44'59"East; thence westerly 8 along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence North 9 81 °26'22" West 68.83 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Containing 11,819 square feet. See Exhibit `HT attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances >lnay be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of 23 I �� /0•09-i2 24 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Date PA PTGOI05011SURVEYILEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 0151Legals122275-8-TCE.doex Page 2 et OP4.2012 — — FIMIRIT A_ PAAF 33 EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 1 1 ,81 9 SO.r T. 1 1 7-270-005 & 01 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003i f ---..,._ 1 E?-27a-aaq o� I �SHEET 3 SHEEN 4 a' r• &s. F R.R. - - ' SHEET 2 •R. 11rg_3aa- I 115-oho-ate , v) IADC. RCL 2 I� 027 NO 2006-0565691I0.R, RCL, 1 I JCL\" rR.S, -- 117-z�a-oa6 63 ' fb6 I -, --- N, FCL. 4 I ____ �. .. -1. rr'2 k-nTrt re rr• . .. r.1� TPOB POB 2? - S 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State III 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on COS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT - -.._w.'winsiesm.1 distances. All distances ore in fee: unless otherwise noted. (� �Irf FEET 0 100 200 4(7t; Spa PREPARED BY: PSOMA 3 Hutton Centre Drive. Ste, 200 Santos And Cos if6rnia 42707 �le1751-7373J#7t4i545-8883 tfoe) _ - DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09 t2 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS rrss U n 7 R1V i 9 t n 6.:7 1 4 FYIIIRIT A_ PAR= Ad EXHIBIT 112 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECTION 30 POR : 1.0T 3, nL OCK /3 I T .3S. , R, 6W.. . h SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO ta.1 ADD WATER COMPANY � EL SOERAN"1 E Cr t ME 9/6 1 MS 1 /@ `l POR. PCL . 2 PCL , I DOC NO, 2006- DOC, NO 2006- e 0565691 U.R, 056569i 0,R. l'� 1, o �,N TPOB `� p R.S. 63/66 _ L 1 -- �i 4-05°57'39" R,283,1 .00' L=294.53` rI mummu 284 3.00 L - 7 S 9.69 � . , PROPOSED R /W C 2 OW o ---- — � , S45°24'51"W(R) Cl N81 40 3$'W 161.21' 123.35' V EXISTING R/W N81 °40`3g"yy __ S37°58`42"WiR1 w POB v7 �22 CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE C1 C2 07°26'09" 06°04'33" 176.53' 176.53' 22,91' 18.72' L1 L2 S81°26'22"E N81°26'22"W 83.19' 68.83' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing 9 360 C > Title to State j 1 i 1 1 Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates ord bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground p 2 2 2 7 5- O TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT m distances. All distonces are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 1.00 150 PREPARED BY: S 0 M S 3 Nutted centre Oriv@, Ste, 200 Santa Ana, 123f( ornia14)54 S270,886 (??a)1Sf-7.T3;{?tai5a5F's$5s tiaxi DATE: 06-15--12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: 0E540 FA#. DISTRICT.COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO TOTAL SHEETS 8 i R I U _ 91 6 s 3 - - 2 - 4 FYNIRIT A_ PORE 1% EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT, 117-270-005 & 013 ROL, I 00C. NO. 2006- 0�65b°) 1 D � i F'OR , SECTION 39 T,39, R.641, ; RANCHO RADIAL DATA EL. SOSRANTE MD 1 /8 BEARING R,S, 63/66 " — ----_ R1 R2 R3 S00° 57'28"E 501 ° 21 '44"1E S01 °22'25"E -- N59°49'50"E `` •- - — 4 6. 06' — --- S02°35'59'"W (R `` —S74024'15,, L4 R3 ° A=05°57'39" / '"---�17, E S87 22'34 E �4 ___�_ --`66 13'_ -, R=2831.00' Q222i75 !,$ — -- L=759.69'--- v L=294.53' L3 cv _ '� A=15° 18:37" R=2843.00' �] u - f R1 R2 W = - \ PROPOSED R/W C3 c= w w a cn A=16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=581.97' "-'" N81 °40'38"W 123,15' EXISTING R/W LA `r' LINE DATA CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH L3 L4 S02°37'26"W NO2°37'26"E 10.98' 8.02' C3 C4 00°24'16" 05°38'01" 2839.00' 2831.00' 20.04' 278.36' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POE Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing 363 ti ) Title to State j I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 222 % 5 - 8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in Meet unless otherwise noted. rommim4 m FEET 0 25 50� 100 10 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drre, Ste. 200 »vto Ann, Coiif,rnio 92707 0107s,373/o.is,15.6833 (FQ. DATE: 06-15712 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAQ: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM( SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS - ti {? { ! `V i 6. 7 I J FMMIRIT A_ PAPF RR EXIIIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT. 117-270-005 & 013 M F— w w w w FOR. SECTION 30 RANCHO EL SOORANTE MS I /8 F.S. PCL, I DOC, NO, 200b 0565691 0,R, r r 38'01„ o'R�2g31 .00 69 t 7„ R_28a3. � L= __�___ pal 5° 1 8 � RCL , DOC, NO, ° 40'20" Sol°0o'26 E. t SQ�"E�R �= l ,- 3 20062. O,R, r FOR, LOT, 12-- 1 ASSESSOR'S M'1P r �. e. N O , 3 i -- �' AMB I /42- 43 •r PCL 4 _ DOC, NO, 2006- 056569 I 0, R, Sq1° 19 57 �, 6.0 ct17° 04 } , 0$1 •g7� 0, t_�5 0' 508.y©. 5`�,� (R 00° 25' 26, R�2g37.00` L�20.g9' Sal°21.39`E 8.50, 131•00' 78°58'24i F kR), ROUTE EXISTING R/W �� FREEWAY 91 RIVERSIDE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing f ) Title to State Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zane 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 22275-S TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FASEME 25 100 r 150 PREPARED BY: S 0 Q 3 Hutton Cenire Drive Ste. 20p Sonia Ana, Coiiforn o 42707 €710 -7373 i7'3j545-8&83 ifas DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 1 0-09-1 2 EA: OF540 FAA: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 Ply 9: 6.9 4 FYGIIRIT A_ PAP.F 37 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: William Von Klug, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Four Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in All or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Accessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-006, 13-007, 13-010, and 13-01 1, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002, 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Agenda Item 7 5 Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is being asked to consider the adoption of four resolutions of necessity declaring its intent to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary 'construction easement interests in all or in portions of certain real property, by eminent domain, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. (APNs) 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; and for the widening, maintenance, and operational improvements of SR-91 CIP. The immediate need for the property acquisitions is to proceed with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. The acquisitions are required for and will benefit the community by providing additional lanes to ease current traffic congestion along the SR-91 through the city of Corona in Riverside County, California. Preliminary title reports and/or litigation guarantees were obtained from Lawyers Title Insurance Company to confirm and identify the record owners of the parcels affected by the Project. The Commission then served the affected property owners with notices of the Commission's decision to appraise the property. The Commission had the properties appraised and made offers to the record owners. Negotiations were unsuccessful for the purchase of the interests necessary for the SR-91 CIP. The adoption of resolutions of necessity for the interests will not prevent negotiations from continuing. Since an agreement has not been reached with the owners of record, it may be necessary to acquire the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests described in the attachments by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is accomplished by the Commission's adoption of resolutions of necessity for the affected property. Description of Property to be Acquired 1) APN 102-020-044, the larger parcel, is owned by the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona. The property is a vacant lot located on the south side of Wardlow Road, approximately 0.25 miles east of Research Drive, in the city of Corona, California. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and • Agenda Item 7 6 temporary construction easement interests in portions of the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-006. 2) APN 102-270=010 is owned by Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., a California corporation. The site address of the property is 1805 West 6th Street, Corona, California. The property is improved with a hotel and comprises a land area of just under one acre. It is necessary to acquire the entire parcel to accommodate relocation of the 6th and Maple Streets onramp to eastbound SR-91. The legal description and map of the property to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-007. 3) APN 1 17-270-002, is owned by Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez. The property comprises a land area of approximately 30,056 square feet and is improved with a truck driving school. The site address of the property is 107 N. Joy Street, Corona, California. It is necessary to acquire the entire parcel to accommodate the realignment of Joy and Pearl Streets near the 91 /15 interchange. The legal description and map of the property to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-010. 4) APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, the larger parcel, are owned by Pearl Street Properties, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. The property comprises a land area of approximately 8.18 acres. The site address of the property is 105 and 211 Pearl Street, Corona, California. The property is improved with warehouse structures. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission to acquire a fee portion of the larger parcel, a well as a permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-01 1. Project Description The SR-91 CIP is generally described as extending the existing 91 Express Lanes into Riverside County for a distance of approximately eight miles; the addition of a general purpose lane in each direction from the 71 /91 interchange to 1-15, the improvement of five local interchanges within the city of Corona and the addition of auxiliary lanes and other operational improvements throughtout the project limits. Agenda Item 7 7 DISCUSS/ON: Hearings and Required Findings The action requested of the Commission at the conclusion of this hearing is the adoption of resolutions of necessity, authorizing the acquisition of real property interests by eminent domain. The property owners are: 1) Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona, APN 102-020-044 fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests. 2) Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., APN 102-270-010 - full acquisition in fee. 3) Santiago. Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, APN 117-270-002 - full acquisition in fee. 4) Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 - part acquisition in fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests. The properties are further identified in the legal definitions, descriptions, and • depictions attached to the respective resolution. California eminent domain law provides that a public entity may not commence with eminent domain proceedings until its governing body has adopted a resolution of necessity, which resolution may only be adopted after the governing body has given each party with an interest in the affected property, or their representatives, a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. Notices of the hearing were sent by first class mail to the property owners, and stated the Commission's intent to consider the adoption of resolutions, the right of the property owners to appear and be heard on these issues, and that failure to file a written request to appear would result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission scheduled this hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date of notice was mailed may appear and be Agenda Item 7 • heard. The Commission's legal counsel mailed the required notices to the property owners, on April 26, 2013, and May 24, 2013, in accordance with the California Code of Civil Procedure, section 1245.235. The property owners were also invited to meet with Commission and Ca!trans staff to address any concerns the property owners may have with the design of the project in the manner proposed and the necessity of the acquisition. The four required findings are addressed as follows: 1) Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proposed Project The acquisition of the properties is necessary to construct the SR-91 C1P, which will reduce traffic congestion and enhance safety, as well as provide an alternative means of transportation along the SR-91 corridor and includes connections to 1-15 in Riverside County. The SR-91 CIP includes adding general purpose lanes and extending tolled express lanes. 2) The Project is Planned or Located in a Manner that will be Most Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury A thorough analysis was conducted ,to find the single best location for this project. Environmental analyses and findings indicate that these sites uniquely satisfy the engineering, public health, and environmental issues, and these locations are the most compatible with the greatest public good. These locations will result in the least private injury. 3) The Property Sought to be Acquired is Necessary for the Proposed Project As described above, a careful analysis was performed regarding these locations and what property and property rights were needed, and these parcels meet all the desired characteristics for the construction of the improvements for the project. 4) The Offer of Just Compensation has been Made Appraisals were prepared by appraisal firms Lidgard and Associates and Kiley Company, to establish the fair market value of the real property the Commission is seeking to acquire from the interest owned by the property owners identified herein. Review appraisals were prepared by Hennessey & Hennessey LLC. Fixture and Equipment Appraisals were prepared by Hodges Lacey & Associates, LLC and Desmond, Marcello & Amster. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the property Agenda Item 7 interests, based on the approved appraisals, as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the interests sought through eminent domain, to ensure the property will be available to meet the time frames associated with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. Environmental Analysis Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act has been satisfied by Ca!trans' certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) in its role as lead agency on August 8, 2012, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission's subsequent consideration of that certified EIR in its role as a responsible agency on November 14, 2012. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Notice of Public Hearing Notices of Hearing to Property Owners were mailed on April 26, 2013 to the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona; Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc.; Pearl Street Properties, LLC; and on May 24, 2013, to Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, the owners of record. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 13-006 2) Resolution No_ 13-007 3) Resolution No. 13-010 4) Resolution No. 13-01 1 10 • • Agenda Item 7 ATTACHMENT 1 • • RESOLUTION NO. 13-006 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-020-044, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-020-044, for the State Route 91 Corridor -Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and • WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California CodeofCivil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing, and temporary construction easementinterests in the property to be acquired is for the 11 SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section-4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined and described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the • • 12 • herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 13 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17136.02100\7935081.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 15 1 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2q 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `A1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 221114 Fee Acquisition APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 9; thence North 80°32'34" West 370.35 feet along the southerly line thereof to the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 9; said corner being the point of cusp with a curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 09°27'26" West; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Parcel 9 and said curve 82.05 feet through a central angle of 08°23'42" to a point thereon; thence South 80°32'34" East 33.25 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,990.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°30'39" West; thence easterly along said curve 174,22 feet through a central angle of 03°20'19"; thence South 86°49'39" Past 82.22 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Parcel 9; thence South 09°28'52" West 29.02 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 4,478 square feet. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. P.'•.2PTG0105011S11RVE` LEdit.LSj22111_.,4PN_102-020-044'Legals\22111-1_Fee.doc Page 1 of 1019/2012 @XHIInA, PACE 2 PSOMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 I combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 8 9 ]0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 st Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 _/Io -/0-/ Date P:12PTG010701\SURVEMEGA!-S122111_APN_102-020-044Legals 22111-1 _Fee doe Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIiiIt3 A, PAGE 3 • r EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-1 FEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 4,478 SOFT. 102-020-044 1027020-04.9 P.M, 15a/ 92- 9. PARCEL 3 , e115 -- `__-0�1 -- PROP SE >t R/ r �0 /— SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL 6=41 ° 24'46" R=559.99' -` =404.74' r N80°32'34"W 370.35' ROUTE 91 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Beoring C ) Title to State Access Prohibited R / St / ° , Ste, j \ 0.; \EXISTING R/W RIVERSIDE FREEWAY f 0 102-020-095 \ POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING 8 9 1 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings pre on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22111-1 FEE ACOUISITION FEET 0 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: PS O M A S i Nef 1C- aY av_..o n i 1 DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09�-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.jTOTAL SHEETS 8 R[V 91 3.4 F EXHIB5A PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TI TLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-1 FEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 4,478 SOFT. WARDLOW ROAD o'L 6=08° 2 3' 4 2" R=559.99' O_ L=82.05 o') boo' ,'''. N80°32'34"W 370.35' 102-020-0. ,,EXI;STING,,RAN ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY BELOW LEFT w w C_ CC w O CO �t w w \p=03°20.19" R=2990.00'_ L=174.22 N80°32'34"W LEGEND POB Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Pont Of Beginning (R) indicates Rod'+ol Beoring ( ) Title to Stote 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) ?one 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centrc Drive Ste. 200 Santo. Ano, California 92707 tit-1w8.1-e053:i71+,S.s-CEtt.'. Wori 15`3/92-=96 PARCEL 9 PROP9SED R/W S86° 49'39nE. 370.35' 0 0 v \1 2.22 , � co N 0 rn 0 POE 102-020-045 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 22111-1 FEE ACOUISITION 60 90 FEET 0 15 30 DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10 09 2012 EA: 0E540 FAsa: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM 1?IV 91 3.4 SHEETNO. TOTAL SHE EXHIn A PAGE 5 • I 2 3 4 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `B1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22.111-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 102-020-044 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 4 9 land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pales 92 through 10 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 9; thence North 09°28'52 East 29.02 feet along the easterly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 86°49'39" West 82.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,990.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 174.22 feet through a central angle of 03°20' 19"; thence North 80°32'34" West 33.25 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 9, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 01 °03'45" West; thence easterly along said northerly line and said curve 34.24 feet through a central angle of 03°30'12" to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,984.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06'29'47" West; thence easterly along said curve 173.11 feet through a central angle of 03°19'26"; thence South 86°49'39" East 82.88 feet to a point on said easterly line; thence South 09°28'52" West 6.04 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,632 square feet. See Exhibit `B2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. P:`•2PT00105011SURVEYILEGALS',221I:_APN_102-020-0441.egaL'.22111`_PE.doc Page 1 of 10/9/2012 EXHIE1'51, PAGE 6 PS OMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of t983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of 11 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 fD--/Q-/2 Date P.UPTGO10501EURVEY\LGGA Si2211 i APA! 102.020-044;I.eaatse221 f ;-2 13E.doc 10, 9/2012 _ _ _ _ Poge 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 • • PARCEL# TITLE EXHIBIT B2 GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-2 ESMT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,632 SOFT. 102-020-044 102-020-049 R , M , 150/92- 96 y 4 / ,--" , J 0=41°24'40" R=559.99' PROPosEo Riw iiien-ssat-sten- N80° 32'34"W 370.35' SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY o S // \q. FOP . Ae 0 O Q N tr) co (V a) 0 v) -,.7040.4141- LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State Access Prohibited EXISTING R W 102-020-045 POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 8 9 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00)Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22111-2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT 1------ �-r= immummommommi FEET 0" 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S J Ho110n Certrle pre„e S+a, 200 ;qn1� ano. Col+forn:o 61d Nq OS7:171_j5/5-2e93 ','9t DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540,. FAu: DISTRICT- COUNTY 8 R1V ROUTE SHEET PM 91 3.4 SHEET NO.�TOTAL SHEETS 2 C H MT�/1j, PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# 22111-2 _ val--.14se GRANTOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA WARDLOW JROAD__ -- A=03° 30' 1 2 R=559.99' L=34.24' ABOVE RIGHT W W t!] 501°013.'45"MR)/ N80° 32 `34"W 33.25' 502° 26"28"E (R ) (R=559.99') 'S06°29'217 W(R)" (R=2.984.00') *ors' ,A=03°1 �9'26" R=2984.00 x 6=03°20'19" R=2990.00' L-174.22 _r +peg s.- em,-Eaet--mm \S06.° 30,'.39" q1R) 102-020 044 EXISTING R/W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROP P_V, 1J,3/92-96 PARCEL 6=03°19�26"—586°4.9�39"E 82,88' ._._. R-2984.00' L=173 11 � �..4 ... N86°�49'39 .'W 82.22" PROPOSED R/W A=03 20' 1 9" R=2990.00' L=1 74.22' e-1W1a-460s-scs--temAMEN- 15HT eM,_3609-411M-19021-arse-501‘1t-mae- LEGEND POB Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing. ( } Title to State t i i Access Prohibited (V- tn 00O 0,6 o v CR— O N 6.04' POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY b.) 0 F` EL NOTES Coordinotes and beorings ore on CCS 198312007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing ore grid.distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PSOMAS Ite.e L." ien-re 3r,ve. Sit. 200. Sant.; Ana, CuGtoen:o 927c; 22111-2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT F.=._. -7 FEET 0 15 30 60 9U DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.:10-09-2012 EA: OF540 COUNTY 8 Riv 1 91 3.4 FAtt: TOTAL SHEE EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 24 • • • 1 2 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSO AS EXHIBIT TV LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No.22111-3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 9; thence North 09°28'52" East 35.06 feet along the easterly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 86°49'39" West 82.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,984.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 173.1 1 feet through a central angle of 03°19'26" to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 9, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 02'26'28" East; thence easterly along said northerly line and said curve 116.13 feet through a central angle of 11 °52'54"; thence South 15° 11'56" East 26.13 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,981.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 04°09'24" West; thence easterly along said curve 51.21 feet through a central angle of 00°59'04'; thence South 86°49'39" East 83.21 feet to a point on said easterly line; thence South 09°28'52" West 3.02 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,907 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. P:12PT00105014St1RVEY\LEGAL S\2211i_A.PN_102-02fi-044\Legals\221I -3 TCE.doc Page I of 1019,2012 EXHIBIT2A� PAGE 10 SOMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are lased on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 3 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described: The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0,99997476. 7 Prepared under the direction of 9 10 11 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 12 13 14 15 16. 17 18 19 20 21 22 93 24 25 26 27 ?8 29 30 31 P:12PT00i0SO'IS {JRVEYILEOALS12211t_,APN i02-020-04411.t ais122?I1-3 YCi?_dot Paw 2of2 10t9t2012 EXHIBIT,(16PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR ARE A APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA ;907 SOFT. 102-020-044 Q\ .tea �o 102-020-049 P , M, 15.3/92-96 PARDE- I 3 PROPOSED R / SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL • 3/ ' \\yP, . ' A=41 °24'46" R=559.99' --1=404.74' 102 020-045 $6. 1� c >•n, 15a/92- .6 'F PARCEL 9 N l ess-45015-19-imer-wieRt-rers-seds-rieek-"-- eon N80° 32'34"W 370.35 EXISTING R/W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB TPOB (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True Point Of Beginning fndicotes Radio! Bearing Title to State Access Prohibited 1 POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING 8 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances: Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22111-3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 120 180 FEET 0 30 60 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S 3 ter. r.•.tr9 Gr ive, Ste., MO Sen+� sno, rott(ornio 92707 .i+s t4f+-8C53/1714154S' mi. if nr} DATE: 07-17-2012 REv.: 10-09-2012 EA: 01-540 FAu: DISTRICT COUNTY RT�r EXHIBIT A PAGE 12 ROUTE .' 91 SHEET PM 3.4 SHEET NO. 1 TOTAL SHEETS 2 27 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,907 SO.FT. 102-020-04 — WARDLOW F- _ CD 0 O m a w (!7 S02°26'28"E(R) (R=559.991 S1 5° 1 1 '56"E 26.1 3' 3, �.— ��6• gg' _ 22"�-° A„ ��SS9' s\A°19' ����°52 5° 0-03 19'26" R=2984.00' L-1 73-1 ...--, u_ J w CO w w to gi 1 `--- -ezmt- — —•-- 506629'47 W(R) (R=2984.00') ROAD �'+�. .seumr-for,-f=n-tit ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE rom-e.mt-effe--ftee-eme,-eame- attes `EXISTING R/W FREEWAY i ....,:_ . � R_2984.00" st-ess-elus" SO4°09'24"W(R) P , M , PARCEL 586° N86' J 58/ 92— 6 9 49' 39"E 83.21 gg`39"�N 82.88 PROPOSED R/W ---. inO Np o� , va �. a - 3.02 ` 4 TPOB -t 0 • u,� M 1.0 0� L...t in 0 a o 6.=00° 59'04,. R=2981 L.51 w..: fl3° i 9"26' L-i 73.11' -spa"testr-atem-riew-rew .00• 21' .,. r -,r..-- ear _" sers-awa-rier-max ROUTE aaommrvrainst+ss•ar-- 91 RIVERSIDE POB FREEWAY LEGEND POB TPOB (R) indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True Point Of Beginning Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State Access Prohibited ( } I 11 NOTES FEET 2 2 1.1 1 - 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCT ION EASEMENT Coordinotes and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. AIt distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. "rimmo * 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: (DATE: PSOMAS 3 401,00 Centre Rr;v±, Ste_ 700 Son tc Ana. Calif orn:o g2707 Litt 15;-.ECS ;t7}•,sn Peas rto> 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: 0E540 FAtt:4 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM - SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ MI/ 91 3.4 2 - 7 EXHIBIT A PAGE 13 28 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 13-007 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-270-010, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire a fee interest in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-270-010, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 29 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee interest in the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal description and the map of the property of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined and described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said • • 30 • • existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 31 File No: 12002670 FEE EXHIBIT "A All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 3 of Trinidad Yorba Tract, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 2 p 22 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to W.I. Hollingsworth by deed from the State of California, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995 of Official Records; thence along the Easterly boundary of said parcel North 9° 25' 50" East 237.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through an angle of 109° 46' 50" a distance of 47.90 feet to Course "A"; thence along Course "A" North 81° 08' 21" East 355.94 feet to the Easterly terminus of that certain curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 343.00 feet in the Southeasterly line of that portion of land condemned by the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records; said point also being on the Westerly boundary of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Ray N. Woods, et ux, by deed recorded May 12, 1961 as Instrument No. 40636, of Official Records; thence Southwesterly along said curve from a tangent bearing of South 78° 51' 44" West through an angle of 69° 25' 54" a distance of 415.65 feet; thence South 9° 25' 50" West parallel with said Easterly boundary 51.48 feet; thence North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That portion of the North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street which would ordinarily pass with a conveyance of Parcel 1 described above, as vacated by Resolution No. 82-115 of the City Council of the City of Corona, recorded January 28, 1983 as Instrument No. 18074, of Official Records, Riverside County records, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the land described in the Director's Deed to W.I. Hollingsworth, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the tangent portion of the Easterly line of Exhibit Q, Page I 33 File No: 12002670 said land of Hollingsworth, South 9° 25' 50" West 44.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 13.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" an arch distance of 20.42 feet to the Southerly line of said North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street; thence along said Southerly line South 80° 34' 10" East to the Southerly prolongation of that certain course having a bearing and length of "South 9° 25' 50" West 51.46 feet" in the Southeasterly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the last mentioned prolongation North 9° 25' 50" East 57.00 feet to said Northerly line of the North 57.00 feet of the West Sixth Street; thence along said West Sixth Street North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 102-270-010 Exhibit A, Page 2 34 • ASSESSOR'S 41.4P 8N 108 PG <7 RIVERSIOE COLNTY, C.4 • • POR r3s R7W. RO L4 SieRRA Y'OR84.1 stA E 91 toe( .63 tub ipcsr--sue-_ _ &fa 2/22 Trirddld Kr.r.tv nfaCY I PM )17/4t12-101 Alyce lito• /9394 4 ck 1- / 0 .70;! ..9;'Y jyy• 1 s,a.r • • •,• Exhibit A, Page 3 35 ATTACHMENT 3 • • RESOLUTION NO. 13-010 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 117-270-002, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire a fee interest in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-270-002, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CUD") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee interest in the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. 36 Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal description and the map of the property of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined and described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to 'easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the =public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property 37 • that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair: Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 38 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Those portions of Lots 37, 39 and 40 and all of Lot 38 of Block "B" of Lands of the South Riverside. Land and Water Company, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as said lots and block are shown on map on file in Book 9 page(s) 6 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, California, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard, 100 feet wide, with the Westerly line of Pearl Street, 60 feet wide, said point also being the Southeasterly corner of that certain 1.97 acres parcel of land described in deed to State of California recorded July 2, 1959 in Book 2502 page(s) 338 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; Thence along the boundary line of said 1.97 acre parcel the following courses: North 8° 13' 53" East (bearing assumed for purpose of this description) along said Westerly line, also being the Easterly line of said Block "B" 441.03 feet; Thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears South 8° 13' 53" West, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet through a central angle of 100° 08' 07" a distance of 43.69 feet; Thence North 71° 36' 00" West tangent to the proceeding curve 130.72 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 40, last said point being the true point of beginning for the parcel herein described; Thence Westerly along the arc of a curve tangent to the proceeding course, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1030.00 feet through a central angle of 7° 01' 15", a distance of 126.21 feet; Thence Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears North 73° 39' 15" West, concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 35.00 feet through a central angle of 86° 46' 02" a distance of 53.00 feet to a point in the Westerly line of said Lot 39, last said Westerly line also being the Easterly line of Joy Street, 60 feet wide; Thence North 1° 06' 47" East, leaving the boundary line of said 1.97 acre parcel along the Westerly line of said Lots 37, 38 and 39 a distance of 144.42 feet; Thence South 74° 19' 02" East 159.63 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 37; Thence South 8° 06' 47" West along the Easterly line of said Lots 37, 38, 39 and 40, a distance of 173.05 feet to the true point of beginning. APN: 117-270-002 Exhibit A, Page 1 40 • POR. C/TY OF CORONA FOR. SEC. 30, T. 3S.R. 6 W, B POT? SOUTH R/K LAND AND WATER CO. ) S£C r id, W.L/N£ SO 4 M.R..Od((Y ♦ 1 74,1 3. \ `r l.. / 1754.4c. 1o•orcAc �"" RIVER r r FRWAY Rr 9/ f ? 1_, f Lot 3 .�` Y\/ , i fb! B/k. 73 1 \< \a, \ ,.. . c r O 3 r ss[ iT2-}a-ioiN d Per. Prr. /t � M✓%n� I. /s If7.4• DATA NWY MA. ES MAW RS, 0/2/ OS WSY ASSESSORS MAP BK. //7 PG. 27 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF Rs lreo SSE 812-55-/08-4 // ,u ems' N/R ONLY 5. S/ Y.C. Ld /4 T.R. A. 4/8 M. B. 9/6, 8 S.B. South Rivers/de Land B Water Ca. A. M. B. //42- 43 Assessor's Mop Na. 3/ P. M. 23/70 SEPT. /974 • / / 7 -27 s- zs /". ZOO' All NQ NEW NO. Rsar.v17 9 7G Rf-MYMS /o �•eN•7 874fi•ry /,k /7 As/•l. .rn•/-s A fe•r.orf /q /7 ./ sr jllli Lift SS CIO //7, /S 70 24 ♦/85 .42 4-Shf 25 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. 13-011 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT, PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, AND 117-270-013, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: 43 Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some m- all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. • 44 • • • Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 45 Le_gai Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Access Easement" refers to an non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement and right of way in favor of ROTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction site, as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent of RCTC. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 47 after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and petpetual easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to, reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove; at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limited to sewers, water, electrical systems and communication systems, consisting wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholds, and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in, under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by ROTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 17336.0210 t7a ur; • EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 48 • PS O AS ! 2 EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRwrioN 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-1 5 Fee Acquisition 6 APN 117-270-007 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document to No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 13 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°40'38" West 19.65 feet 18 continuing along said general southerly line to the beginning of a curve concave 19 northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and 20 said general southerly line 15.87 feet through a central angle of 36°21'56"; thence South 21 81 °26'22" East 29.38 feet to a point on said westerly line, said point being the beginning 22 of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which 23 point a radial line bears South 52°17'05" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and 24 said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle .of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of 25 Beginning. 26 27 28 Containing 130 square feet 29 30 31 See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. PA2PTG0165011SURVEY\LEGALS122275, APN i 17-270-0071Legals122275-1-Fee.docx Page ! of 2 10/ 17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 49 P OMAS 2 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 3 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to 4 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 5 6 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 7 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 8 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 9 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 10 II 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 15 16 ram•► la-/7-/2 17 a Date 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN 117-270-007\Lega1s122275-1-Fee.doex page 2 of 2 10117/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 50 EXHIBIT A2 PARCELtt TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP, 130 SO. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 t 17-2 °-004 oo '- A. T„&S.F. R, ,q, 1 9`300-421 "�-- 1115-{360-0161 .. 1 te) a _ — — �I 000. NO, 2006-0565691 O.R. vc PO .. 21 PCL. 1 Poi Q 117-270-006 E R, _ _- ._ I S NB t ' 40'19' yy— 212.14 1 © I Poi "2;r22r7n4 S1 T P O B 1 365 L SHEET 2 J 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CiL STA'HONING IA LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radio, Bearing ( ) Title to State i i i i i Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on GCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6,Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide cy 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 7 r FEE ACOUISIT{ON distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 140 240 400 600 PREPARED er: 3 dui fan crw re Orive Sec, 200 r��.-,ij15'-'3711(,et iit5i5-a ®3 (ccvl DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FAit: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM 'SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS $ - R IV 91 6.9 i 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 51 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN FEE PEARL STREET PROP 130 50.FT. 1p22275-1 117-270--007 ink !R ' SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND WATER R COMPANY 30 M9 9/6 I, LRl tu . 0 a2' Al CC r� Srt vl PCI 2 ! ,, DOC , NO. 2006�- 0 565691 U . R . V.! b ? CL ~ ( M l O O° 1 1 Z r3r..1j 0 a� p06' 4- 9°S1'1q. R=25,00, � Lg ,. _ L� g C .-3 g . 21 , .�,- -- .._ -� O� 6,, `; - -_ 14° 1 26'22"r -- CJ 4=36021 ,56,, --`'` :F,< g ..,11ar t Fe= 6S5' 2 , L-R1 5.00' 19.65' 5.87, N81 °40.38„ w 1'`6.96 Nei• °40'3g„w (2r % 1 rPOQ 212.14' PRopase, RfW LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of .Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial ®paring ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( }Title to State j I I I i Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 i -1 FEE ACOWSITION ground ,0. distances. All distances ore in Feet unless otherwise noted. KIT 0 1O` 0 60 PREPARED BY: 1 Hutton Centre Drive,t Ste. 200 - iuna Arno, Ceti fpr,io WO f11405s-73111171415A5-8863 frox) DATE:6-1512 REV,: 10--17-12 £A:0E540 FM*: DISTRICT 'COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 FM 91 6.9 2 - 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 52 PJ OMAS 1 EXHIBIT `BI' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-2 5 Fee Acquisition 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 . recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28"; thence South 81'2622" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41 °20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve 25 165.85 feet through a central angle of 03°20'58"; thence North 02°32'29" East 95.94 feet 26 to a point on the general northerly line of said Parcel 4, said point being the beginning of 27 a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 13° 11'22" West; thence easterly along said northerly line the 29 following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 30 00°45'34" and 2) South 77'34'12" East 140.88 feet to the northeasterly comer of said 31 Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 73.97 feet along the general easterly line of said P:12PTG0105011SURVEMECALst22275_APN_I17-270-005 and013_115-060-013 and 0151Legalga.2275-2-FEE.docx Page 1 of3 I0/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 53 PS OMAS Parcel 4 to the southeasterly comer thereof and the beginning of a non -tangent curve 2 concave northwesterly having a radius of 1,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 3 South 18'23'16" East; thence westerly along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4 4 and along said curve 199.21 feet through a central angle of 05°51'11" to the most 5 southerly comer thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; 6 thence South 41 ° 19'57" East 15.92 feet along said northeasterly line to the most easterly 7 corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78°58'24" 8 West 131.00 feet to the most easterly corner of said Parcel 1, said point being the 9 beginning of anon -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to to which point a radial line bears South 08°20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly 1 line of said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses: t) along said curve 581.97 feet 12 through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40'38" West 123.15 feet to the I3 Point of Beginning. 14 15 Containing 51,953 square feet 16 17 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 18 and relinquishes to the tirantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 19 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 20 21 See Exhibit `B2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 25 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG01050PSURVE't\LEGALS122275 APN I t 1-270-005 and 013 115-06O-0I3 and 0150Legalst22275 2•FEE.doex Page 2 of 3 )0/9nO12 _ EXHIBIT A,. PAGE B 54 PS MAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 4 5 6 Brian E. Bullock, PiS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 0 31 /D - DY-/Z Date P vpTG0105O11SURVEVALEGAt.5122275 APN 1 t7 270-005 and 013 115-060-0J13 and Ot51Legat<_122275-2-FEE.dacx Page 3 of 10/9/2032 — ` EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 55 EXIHBIT 2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 11117-270-010 —23 & 13 0-005 & 1 �� 2 00.1 2 SHEET • r•�s.F, ( NO. 2006-05656911 ( I fi,g, 63/66 �- rr.�r---J SHEET INDEX SHEET A nt.,. RIVERSIDE 1 1 . SHEET 5 . _ 3 R R ., PCL. I -'_------ 4.tr..�.M�—• ( 1.9-s,„... O„R. ( 117-270-0031 I oQ I t LI „�_ _ 27p_a04 SHEET POL. (t1s-a6a-a1a PIslk FREEWAY K'- 117-270-0a6 s .- ----- - 1... ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE J ...“*\, _L \ 365 ROUTE 91 1 360 FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND P08 indicotes TPOB Indicates (R) indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing to State Prohibited ( ) Title 1 1 I 1 I Access NOTES FEET 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACQUISITION - Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983i2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Aii distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 0 t00 200 400 600 PREPARED By: PSOMASDISTRICT 3 Mutton Centro Cw;ve Ste. zoo (71417SI °73i3/0 ; s;s i703 8$3 tso.y DATE:06-15-12 REv.: 10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FAts: COUNTYiROUTE ' SHEET PPS SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R i V 91 6.9 1 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 56 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE. 22275-2 FEE GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. AREA 51,953 Sa. FT. APN 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 1\ LJ OL PROPOSED R/W FOR, LOT 3; BLOCK 73 5OJ T H R 1 VE:n i DW LAND AND WATER COMPANY ME 9/6 FOR, PCL 2 DOC , NO. 2006- °565691 O.R. A=02° 51 '28" R=176.53' R.9. 63/66 i FOR. SECTION 30 1 T.3S,; R.bW, 1 RANCHO 1 L SOSRANTE 1 { PCL, 1 1 DOC, NO, 2006- 0565691 0.7 , -- S81 °26'22"E 57.22' MS ua A=1 5°25'16"�R=2851 .00' L=767.34' 022'75-? ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND PO8 indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radio! Bearing t ) Title to State 1 1 1 I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in -feet unless otherwise noted, N81.a 40'38,41 123.15' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY /C/L STATIONING 22275-2 FEE ACOUISlTION 360 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 r PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 µue to. Centre 0,ivetSte. 260 Sonto ,'no, Lot+tarnIo 5i270, 0 4)1St-1373/0F4)545-ml 4iC:E DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA1t: DISTRICT ! COUNTY 8 R1V ROUTE 01 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET N(3. 2 TOTAL SHEET 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 57 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO, FT. 117-3 & 013 t-270-0t0-005 & 013 POR . SECTION 30 T.3S. y R.6►1J. • E RANCHE.) El- SOBRANT_ DOC. NO, 2006-- ME1 118 0565691 O.F1. R.S. 63/66 z- r ---- PROPOSED R /W e�` —..._ ___ _ — . _ _ _ _-,_ v 1- L�=iS°25`16" R=2851.00' I-J---1..1---I-� w w w r� s N ---"� w w In 4=16°40'20" R=2000.00' 1-581.97' N81 ° 40' 38"W t 23.15' EXISTING R/W N 2227 ,T2 • ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA. STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 ( } Title to State 1 1 I i l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1963(2007=00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grie distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACOUIS1TION distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. - FEET 0 25 50 700 150 PREPARED BY: S 3 eW,*m cer»re ]rive Stc. 700 01.0:S-73734710545.68M ;Pax; � DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V - - 91 6.9 J 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 58 EXHIBIT B2 PAR CEL# 22275-2 TITLE GRANTOR FEE PEARL STREET PROP, AREA 51,953 SO. FT, APN 1 ; 5-060-01 3 •, 015 117-270-005 s, 013 M SEE SHEET PO . 3�'- '' POR . LOT , 1 2- A- FOR . SECT I ON 30 � 00C , NO . 2006- ---- ASSEGSOP ' S MAP I,3S., - f?,6bU. 1 05656.91 fl.R. NO, 31 RAACHO �, � AMB 1 /42- 43 — EL SO8RAN'T R,S, b3)(66 � PC1 . `r `� MB 1/8 _ 000. NO, 2006- 0565691 O.R. r5$, ` PGL, 1 i p=03°24 DOC. N0. 2006- 0 56t E (R)' R-2e. • cs., 0565691 O . r? . S06 38 �..,` L,165.85 pR4t'©SED 131{gyp.' --.� .. L'=581 .97 , tV78°S 00 Raoo.oa' SpB:2a 222.77`5=' EX15T1NG R/W ICE FREEWAY 9� RIVERSIDE ROUTE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND 365 POB indicotes Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing i ',Title to State j 1 11 ( Access Prohibited SEE SHEET 5 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Oivide by 0,99997476 to obtain ground distances. all distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACOLIIS1 TION FEET 0 25 50 00 150 PREPARED By: 3 tgtiton Centre Or4,e, Sic 200 Soato Ant eottiora,o ?27o1 otty6t4313/ /14t$4S-B883 iro.) DATE: 05- 1 5- 201 2 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OE540 DISTRICT COUNT YI ROUTE I 8 R 1 V 91 SHEET PEA 6.9 SHEET N 4 FA*: d. TOTAL SHEETS 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 59 EXHIBIT B2 PARCELlt TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE 1 PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117_270-005 & 013 S 13 ° i 1 „4'2.W lR 119- 300- ��7g5'3gt� 021 T---',66261 A.T. & S.F. R. R, i 3q-12„E 140.88' . >4 Yt�f .r i ) , ' — }• x Co- MAC ' 115-060-015 1—f (N W cf1 � a re) £� zgcn n r ' .� r "4 ui k. p� ` S 93 ,y /aa 'ci3� 6 M1ft 'fY. M1iR _"Q = 7 �. J2' .s'as' ,. .d :'A' 1 Ka 1 4 rr„. CA ` p #, t, t 1� R � d rz f ,: EXIStl G 510� i i °p• R1°R v � �s� sue,, R F 3I O LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing of ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( ) Title to State C/L STATIONING ' ) I 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99937476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACOWSITION -.__.... distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. � _, _, _.,_r.._._......,_. , FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P S 0 A S J Mu. ton Contra Dri.•• SO.. 200 Sonia An0 tatilnrn:u S270: I2141Vit• 1)11,01+1545. M VOA{ DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R!V 91 6.9 5 - 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 60 PSO AS 1 EXHIBIT `CI' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-3 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 a In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document to No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81'40'38" West 13 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said 17 point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 18 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle of 20 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 29.38 feet to a 21 point on the general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a 22 non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a 23 radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said 24 general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to a point thereon; 25 thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land 26 described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non- 27 tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said 29 westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03'07'25" to the 'True Point of 30 Beginning. 31 P:l2PTG010501\SURVEYTEGALS122275_APN 117-270-0071Legals122275-3-PE.docx Page 1 oft 10/17/2012 _ EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 61 PS S 1 Containing 235 square feet. 3 See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 6 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 7 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 9 (0 11 Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 / 15 <4- 6Steeefa ! D - r7l Z 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 P i2PTG010501ISURVEYILEGALSl22275_,APN_I 17-270-0071C.egais122275-3-PE.docx Page 2 of 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 76 62 EXI-IIBT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-3 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 235 SO. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 11 i_z7o-oo4 o� 1-- � . T• &S•F • R„ R. 11g 3p0_02T 115-060-016 ti L ti i 0-"El -- — VI 00C .. NO. .2006--0565691 O. R, 4 PGl_. 21 POL. 1 1 17- 270-00611 --TPOB--�------ s, ---- --• - -_b------ _--_--f__�__ N814 I 212.14' i j POB i __ -I�� ! _-... SHEET 2 360 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/I_ STATIONING A% LEGEND •• POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radios Beoring { ) Title to State 1 I LA i Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5 -3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: IDATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: Oc540 €Alt: PSO AS 3 Butfcn Color* Or;ot, Ste. 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $owo Alto totiforni0 72707 M4)751-7373r1 710545-8883 (car) 8 RIV 91 _ _ 6.9 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17 63 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# IT1TLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22275-3 IESMT PEARL STREET PROP l 235 5O.FT. 117-270--007 ' f r � CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH 30' Cl 25.00' 1 24°40'57" 10 77' r C2 206.53' j 03°07'25" 1 1 .26' l RADIAL DATA BEARING t•.. Li�y �¢� R1 569°22'14"W !1 (-1) pr! 7 r J �, DOC., NO, .2006-OJ6v691 0, R, 4 ZD Q. o r- v , POR . LOT 3 i BLOCK /3 r ,� `'o° �, SOUTH RIVERSIDE (_AND o < AND WATER 1� COMPANY u , o ao ��y MB 9/6 A=89051'14,. ...... -... ` -A\P_ 6' `L°) ti R 3 5.00 • R 1 ' `'offrZa _``L4- 6.22"E `5' ,1. o �A4 4N g.21CT S8282 i.#.54 ... 52 a � 5 184iRj:3& �.. -- �`' "'llll' i fi'_07 55.52. �r 06.53• ., L ~6 . 19.65, �T — 96 22,:n 3 N87 °40'384 N81 °40'38..�, 212.1 7-Poe4 -__ PROPOsED LEGEND P08 indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing t FREEWAY ROUTE C )Title to State 91 RIVERSIDE 1 11 I Access Prohibited NOTES coordinates and bearings are on cCS 1983(2007.M Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 7 — PERMANENT WALE FOOTING; EASEMENT distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 1p 20 - 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 aeo tort t@ntrQ or4e ste. 'MO 5cx,to Arve, tee,tornio S2107 i2F4:Tgi.,111<(F)9)Sa5-5883 {taxi GATE:6-15 12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEET1 - ,:'t/ 7Crtt 1 6.9 2.. _ 2 L EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 64 PSO AS 1 2 EXHIBIT `Dr LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Cakrans Parcel No, 22275-4 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: ll 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a I8 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51 `28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet 22 through a central angle of 04°34'41 "; thence South 81'26'22" East 68.83 feet to the 23 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly 24 along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence South 25 41 ° 19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 26 having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°51'38" East; 27 thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence 28 North 81 °26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 29 30 Containing 6,614 square feet. 31 • P:12P7G0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN i117-270-005 and 013 115-060.013 and 015U.egals122275-4-1E.doex Page 1 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 65 PSO AS t See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 Prepared under the direction of 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 /0 -09-1Z Date PA2PTG010501LSURVEYILEGAL5122275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-0540T3 and O15%cga1s122275-4-PE_do`x Page 2 of 10J9I2012 — EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20 66 EXHIB T D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.ET. 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 117 ----___ SHEETS3 SHEET 4 270-004 0 r• &s. I R• R' it, 2 � 7 i 9-30p_ ti 1 5-060-Ot 6 CcSHEET n_ � I 00C PGL. 2 � I , 02 i NO, 2006- 0565691 0 , R . PCL. c 117-270-o06j R�s. 63 4 PCL, ( - _ _1_ TPOB POB 22�?q. 365 . .r— — 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Cit. STATIONING 1 iii LEGEND "r POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of _Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing - ( ) Title to State Ili I I Access Prohibited NOTES . Coordinates and bearings ore on cc5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances end stationing are grin distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 7 5 r PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in. feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 � 400 600 PREPARED 8Y: PSOMAS $ „vim,. ",,,re Crave .5. 2.34 Saoio eno-.ot'rorr'c 9210 I_y 1.07St-•/r3, 's44t5a5.8881 040 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT1COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PPS 'SHEET NO TOTAL SHEETS i `f S RI �7 91 6.9 { 1 4 � EXHIBIT A, PAGE 27 67 EX IBIS' D PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA i APN !, 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.ET.I 117-270-005 & 013 i POR.. SECTION 30 i✓SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO0;2. L0's" 3; 'BLOCK `/3 "f.3S.. R.b�l. Lai \\ AND WATER COMPANY SOSRANTE cc MS 9/6Mn 1 /8 POR , PCL , 2 PCL . 1 -.I DOC. NO. 2006- DOC. NO, 2006- ct 056569) O.R. 0565691 0,,R. vt Q.---- � R,S. 63/66 -' �o S45° 24'51 "W(R) 0 S40°50'10"W(R) 6 '._~4ar�►&..4241 2 . _ 5 18`37 R=284 .00' L=759.69. "*r►+. F- �, „, , ,. PROPOSED R/W C'�UJ w ..ilir N81°40' 38"W 161.2i' �� C2 Cl EXISTING R/W 103.1 ' N81 to w 40 38„W TPOB W v.) S37°58'42"W(R) POB 2 7:5"4 es CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH I BEARING DISTANCE Cl C2 02°51'28" 04°34'41" 176.53' 176.53' 8.81' 14.10' LI �S81°26'22"E L2 N81°26'22"W 68.83' 57.22' C3 15°25'16" 2851.00' 767.34' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CsL STATIONING LEGEND PO8 Indicates Point Of —ammo., ,Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning M) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 1 i 1) j Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES •2 Coordinates and bearings ore on CGS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 2 2 7 r L PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT __._ - FEET p 250 300 150 PREPARED BY: 3 Hutton ,:snare (wive, 70t 360 f�4175�7373i01415o59869] #foxt - DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OP540 PA#:PSOMAS DISTRICT - COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEET o 8 nra nIV n 91 6.7.. 2 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 22 68 EX IBIT D2 FARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA ARN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.F1. 117-270-005 R. 013 N X VI L.LI°40'38'"W w cn _ _. -' POR . 7,3S,; EL. --- --� r1=15° 18'37" SECTION 30 R,8W, OBRAI S f �JBft�1fy71r MB 1/0 R,S. 63/88 1 -, PROPOSED R%>:J U'OC. 0565691 PC' 4 NO, 2006- O.Z. — r , ~ , ` -- --�-�- � v�i -7- — R=2643.00' R=2851 .00 .r. L-581.97' FREEWAY — d=1 5° 25,1 6m• A=16°40'20"` S' ROUTE . gym -� N81 123.1 i ilk 97 2 R=2000.00` EXISTING RiW RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE C/L STATION NG - 363 LEGEND P0B Indicates Point TPOB Indicates True (R) Indicates Radial Of Beginning Point Of Beginning Bearing ) Title to State I.1 i I I Access Prohibited NOTES 2 2 2 PERMANENT WALE. FOOTING FEEL 0 ., 25 50 7 �- EASEMENT r1, t f 1,._ Coordinates and bearings ore an Cc5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ail distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ,1I !OG 150 PREPARED BY: S I taut tnn Cen+re qr}.e, Ste, ;00 $V to *no_,Coi;forn:9 WO- ldtm}7gs-'373r{7ttiglg-EBB3 ;Faxi DATE:06-1 -12 REV.: I0-09-12 EA: OF540 FAQ: SHEETS DISTRICT - - COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO.TOTAL 8 R I V 91 6.9 3 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 23 69 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR I AREA A P N 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SG,.ET. 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECTION 30 FOR. LOT. I2-A ASSESSOR'S ASAP ,_._ ., T.3S., R.6411. -- NO, 31r RANCHO PCL. 3 -- �� AMS 1/42-43 EL SrJaiZAN"C£ 00C. NO, 2006~ rCL, 11'''- MB 1/9 0565691 U:R. ---000, NO. 2006--- R.S., 63/66 r -� �- 0565691 U.R. P.. 1 i 00c . NO. Soso- � -' , s 'S06�43,07„E Rl R-28?:0,. ` -- EiR1 L- A. -- . 9.71 ' PROPOSED R /w M � , -- ��, 7:759 �:- - �p 15° 18 37 R,2a43.0 ��767.3a. 2 5 ` 16" R�2851 .0�., 506° 51 54 j2193 7„E LA I�- t 5° �` 2227574 �", g7 ` 1a 1- Oo ` _ _' . N78 `29,,Vi UJ a 0 w It, v) L�5$1 58 R � 2000 . a0' -` A=16°40'2Cr sag° 20,Sc�.sisti EXISTING RJ'NOQSIDE FREEWAY RIVE - ROU)E 9 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 7 365 LEGEND PoB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning 02) indicates Rodiol Beoring ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes ond bearings are on CC5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances ond stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 ? 5 - PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet runless otherwise noted. _ FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: 1 No tads [tile* Of ve, Sie. Ma Som0 Arw [o!ifGe0i0 9?707 (7!4(75!-7373/M4;545-e993 Sfo.7 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAs: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS 8 FUN/ 91 6.9 7 4 f EXHIBIT A, PAGE 24 70 • PSO AS 1 EXHIBIT `El' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-5 5 Permanent Access Easement 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 1t 12 Beginning at the southeasterlycorner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37'58'42" West thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 83.74 feet through a central angle of 20 27° 10'45" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along last said curve and said easterly line 29.96 feet 22 through a central angle of 09°43'31" to a point thereon; thence South 80'17'36" East 23 46.41 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 224.00 feet; 24 thence easterly along said curve 24.60 feet through a central angle of 06°17'32"; thence 25 South 86°35'08" East 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a 26 radius of 1,686.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 151.42 feet through a central 27 angle of 05°08'45" to the beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a 28 radius of 500.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 63.00 feet through a central angle 29 of 07° 13'08"; thence South 74° 13'16" East 50.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 30 northerly having a radius of 350.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 65.39 feet 31 through a central angle of 10'42'19" to the beginning of a compound curve concave PA2PTC010501LSURVEYILEGALS122275 APN_117-270-CAS and013_115-060.013 and 0i5U.egaisl22275-5-Accesz_do°x Page I of [O/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 25 71 PSO AS 1 northerly having a radius of I,432.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 137.16 feet 2 through a central angle of 05°29'16" to the beginning of a compound curve concave 3 northerly having a radius of 375.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 169.53 feet a through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave 5 southerly having a radius of 325.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 154.43 feet 6 through a central angle of 27°13'30"; thence South 89°05'30" East 63.16 feet; thence 7 South 02°32'29" West 25.01 feet; thence North 89°05'30" West 62.45 feet to the 8 beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence westerly 9 along said curve 142.55 feet through a central angle of 27°13'30" to the beginning of a 10 reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 11 said curve 180.83 feet through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a 12 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 1457.00 feet; thence westerly 13 along said curve 114.83 feet through a central angle of 04°30'56" to the beginning of a 14 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thencewesterly along 15 said curve 80.25 feet through a central angle of 11°29'40"; thence North 74°24'15" West 16 34.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; 17 thence westerly along said curve 35.97 feet through a central angle of 05'09'10" to the 18 beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a radius of 1,660.00 feet; 19 thence westerly along said curve 203.64 feet through a central angle of 07°01'43"; thence 20 North 86°35'08" West 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 21 radius of 250.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 27.46 feet through a central angle 22 of 06° 17'32' thence North 80°17'36" West 31.59 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 23 24 Containing 26,164 square feet. 25 26 See Exhibit `E.2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PTG01050RSURVEMEGALS122273 APN_t 17-270.00S and 013_115.0604B and 015\Legais122273-5-Access.docx page 2 of 10i9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 26 72 • • PSO AS 1 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /D-dl`-,/2 Date PX2PTGO I 050nSUR VEVILEGALS122275 AP'N 117-270-005 and 013 115.060-013 and 0151Lega1s122275-5-Acetss.dacx Page 3 of 3 100/2012 ` EXHIBIT A, PAGE 27 73 EXHIBIT 3E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 S0. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-0031 1,y_ T� o�� SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET �5 �I o I � � SHEET 2 q. T.4S. � ( F' fr-R• f I ,�o 1{ 1 115-060-016 I 9-3pp-Ozt f .. 01 —J Q POL. 2 I'► 0e. i I NO. 2006-05b56911 O.R.. POL. I I .a c ` R'8' I I 1a 117-270-006 63/66 ( _ i, L J I _ __ _._. W _._ r.�qJ TPOB POB 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING �: LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R1 Indicates Radial Bearing C ) Title to State 1 1 4 1 1 AcceSs Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.0M Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to abtoin 2 2 2 7 - PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. #_ FEET 0 t00 200 400 600 PREPARED By: PSOMAS 3 :%T bent-e %;4° Ste. 2" [dntd ia� `aC:fprnia �. 707 { 71a1751-t173,0ms.s-eesi v. 1 _ DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAS: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV n 71 6.9 1 G 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 28 74 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA ; APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,154 ! 115-060-013 & 015 50. FT: 117-270-005 & 013 POrR. LOT 3- SLOCI< 73 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND ?UR: ?r,L. 2 ?Uf1, SECTION 3� '' AND WATER COMPANY DOC, NO, 2006- T.3S,; R.601, to MS 9/6 0565691 J.i{. RA1�IO}IO cc EL SOSRANTE � T POB M1 1 /a ` R2 cc -- 586°35'08"E A=05°08'45" _____ � �L ___,.C3.� 123.46' ,,.„..- R=I686.00' L=151.42'. (1. — 1 ,- R1 (2227.5-5� ,, �� LS C14� N 86°35'08"�W'— r �-- A=07°01'43'--.'- 123.46 O �, f?.S. 63/66 ` ; —"" �`�Iiiii��. .. _° PROPOSED R/W „-t . N81 40'384 161 .21 ' R=1660.00'L=203.64' DOC. NO._ 200.6- 0565691 0 ., R , �' --- --- --- ° I w V) AI81 „ t, POB 123. 5' ��� EXISTING RIWlii w °�cb A. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY lit CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE Cl 27°10'45" 176.53' 83.74' L1 S80°17'36"E 46.41' ilk or C2 09°43'31" 176.53` 29.9.6' LS N80°17'36"W 31.59' C3 06°17'32" 224.00' 24.60' R1 S65°09`27"W C14 06°17'32" 250.00' 27.46' R2 S74°52'58"W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C/L STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning ----- TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radiol Beoring 9 360 < ) Title to State I I i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES , Coordinotes and bearings ore on cc5 1963(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT •;;C-g ground distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted, -- --__ FEET 6 25 50 104 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hurl°. Cent,*-Qriv*. St®. 2C'J 1+)35;-/373 €/0 t-IY545.8CO3 Ei O./ DATE:06-15-12 PEV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAlt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS1 8 R I V 91 6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 29 75 PARCEL# TITL EC GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECTION 30 T.3S.; a7.6W, RANCHO ?CI . I EL SOERANTE DOG, NO, 2006- M8 I/2 0565691 O.R. S74° 13"16"E 50.63' yC4 _..� CS I .S. 63/66 -" C a 2275 ; .. ' ter.. — ,. N c—'�-- \C N74°24'15"W C11 = ..=-,e�`� C10� 34.28'� _ -C —7 1� 1--T--- --�-1-F-�" r - w I 1 i I J�� T t�1 s u.1 EXISTING R/W PROPOSED R/W 4./) 1n --,_ --__ !yl � �``-- A=16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=581.97' f N81 °40'38"W 123.15' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY w 1./1 CURVE DATA CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C4 05°08'45" 1686.00' 151.42' C9 25°54'09" 400.00' 180.83' C5 07° 1 3'0$" 500.00' 63.00' C10 04° 30'56" 1 457.00' 1 14.83' C6 10°42'19" 350.00" 65.39' C11 11°29'40" 400.00' 80.25' sw C7 05°29'16" 1432.00' 137.16' C12 05°09'10" 400.00' 35.97' C8 25°54'09" 375,00' 169.53' C13 07°01'43" 1660.00' 203.64' 4 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY i CA STATIONING LEGEND PO® Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning Do Indicates Radio! Bearing 363 2 ( } Title to State I i i 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore an CCS 19830007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2, 2 7 5 - PERMANENT' ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. Ail distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. A I_,- I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPAnED BY: 3 A4?t4n Cantra Drive, Ste. 200 PTa4)J5i 1323/{31inp5+5-8 91 troxt DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA1t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM rSHEET NO. -TOTAL SHEETS 8 R t I V 91 6.9 3 - 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 30 76 EXHIBIT E2 RARLEL# TITLE GRANTOR j AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. ( 26,164 1 SQ. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 M 1--.M = N. w FOR. LOT. I2-A PGL. 3 ASSESSOR'S MAP POR. SECTION 30 DOG, NO. 2006- NO. 31 T.33. - R.6'W, 0565691 0,R, AiMB 1/42-43 RAheHO EL SJ�RAN'iE -1" 0---„/L2--- MB 1/a R.S.`t63/66 p.2 Ot ��1y '" '- DOG. NO, 2006- , r J� �� - - - � %. -- 4—., 0565691 O.R. / 0 ....-.� `� '�` ` � ° 13' 3 55 --21 t,A42. 125o 54 J0 6o, ---5 ,.�ZrL�F? � R,.5OO'0 �t , 0 L � ! .'.' , i �. Fi • Y +�� ,a - PCL. 4 ," =z. r" oSA g0.a3'"` .+' DOC. NO. 2006- vo. 05'65691 O.R. ---- — PROPOSED R/W -9T� `" N78°58 , W w Ld la cn L=581 „"- KtR-20p0•Q4 O _ 16°40'20" � d- EXISTING R/W of ' 0 LINE DATA 0._ BEARING DISTANCE rn L2 S89°{}5'30"E 63.16' -' L4 N89°05'30"W 62.45' REEVI° F E g� R1VER�I� ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE C/L STATIONING LEGEND 6 P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I i I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00I Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet :.finless otherwise noted. 2 2 2 7 - PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 4 25 50 1e0 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 Nutted CentroINN*, Sta. 204 OF4a4:�- 37S/0tl}gi L884 1ra4) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: Of540 FAD: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM `SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEET O�j 8 RIV 91 G/� 6.9 �i 4 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 31 77 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 LINE DATA ---_� N BEARING DISTANCE A=00°45'34" L2 S89605'30"E 63.16' Po R=5779'66' L3 502°32'29"W 25.01' L=76.62' L4 N89°05'30"IN 62.45' .___ L2� F "� S77°34.12„E 140A. T ss & S-FR . .R. k r) PCL. 11 -� DOC. NO. 2006- 3 "co. I- L4 056569 I 0 . R , POR. LOT. 12-A ;, Nl 115-060--015 w _ -- — ASSESSOR'S MAP 0 N N O . 31 'no -2 AM S 1 /42-43 ''' ,5 7,.5)� o wv. w to � IA R.S. 63/66 _2�' s PROPOSED R/w mo 0���9 Z° 32, Oq' E �,, �5p 00 v1 D'p � � A� XISTING R/W J f. N78°1.00' S41 °1 9'57"E VORS�p 58 2Q W 1 5.92 RI R°°1E 9 31 � LEGEND POB Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) g ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Indicates Rodial Bearing C/L STATIONING ( ) Title to State 11 I 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone G. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground 2 2 2 7 5- 5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT --.- distances, A11 distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 1W++en een+re Dr...e S+e. t00 �(7;'417Si-/373i171:is+s48en gro.) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAts: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ R IV 91 6.9 5 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 32 78 5O AS EXHIBIT `F1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Calfrans Parcel No. 22275-6 5 Permanent Utility Easement 6 APN 115-060-013 & 015 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence along the general northerly 13 line thereof the following two (2) courses: 1) North 77°34'12" West 140.88 feet to the 14 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 and 2) westerly along 15 said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 00'45'34" to a point thereon; thence 16 South 02°3229" West 95.94 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave 17 northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 18 09°59'54" East; thence westerly along said curve 73.33 feet through a central angle of 19 01°28'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing westerly along said 20 2,837.00 foot radius curve 14.82 feet through a central angle of 00° 17'58"; thence North 21 39°12'38" East32.30 feet; thence North 51°44'48" West 248.65 feet to a point on the 22 northerly line of said Parcel 3; thence South 74°26'30" East 64.80 feet along said 23 northerly line to a point thereon; thence South 5,1°44'48" Fast 206.79 feet; thence South 24 39°12'38" West 25.00 feet; thence North 51°44'48" West 7.50 feet; thence South 25 39° 12'38" West 21.53 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 26 27 Containing 6,181 square feet. 28 29 See Exhibit `F2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 30 31 PAIPTG01050PSURVEIRLEGAL5122275 APPI137-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 0151Lega1s\22275-6-PUE.d°ex Page I of 2 10/9/2032 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 33 79 PSO AS 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 Prepared under the direction of 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 1v -D9-47 Date PA2PTG01050115URVEYlLEGALS122275 APN 117-270-005 And 013 115-060-013 and 015lLega15122275-6-PUE.docx Page 3 of 2 10151012 - EXHIBIT A, PAGE 34 80 • FARCEL# 22275-6 t77-270-003 117-270-007 TITLE PUE 117-270-006 EXHIBIT F2 GRANTOR 360 6,181 S0_ ;_ SHEET INDEX ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND .POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (10 indicates Radial Bearing )Title to State I I I 1 ;Access Prohibited 115-060-013 & 015 SHEET 2 1 15- 060-016 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C!L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.49997476 to obtain ground distances. Al! distances ere in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 22275n-6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: 3 mo ton Contra trivc Ste. ?C.9 Srnsu + Coraorn;43 d tr175t•?b73a1;411, 5-Wal f 0.). DATE:06—I5-12 REV.:2; 0-09-12 EA:OF540 FAss: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.ITOTAL SHEETS' 8 RR/ 91 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 35 81 EXHIBIT F2 PARCEL# TITLE 22275-6 PUE GRANTOR AREA PEARL STREET PROP. 16,181 SO, FT: CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00°45'34" 5779.66' 2837.e0`1 76.62' 73.3 ' C2 01°28'52" C3 00°17'58" 2837.001 14.82' `S74°26'30„E r 46.46• 64 8p R•S' b3/b" O. 51ef;. RADIAL DATA ! BEARING R1 1 S13° 1 1 `22"W R2 i S09°59'54"E R31508° 31 '02"E R4 S08° 1 3'04"E I APN 115-060-013 & 015 LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 N39°12'38"E 32.30' L2 S39512'38"W 25.00' L3 N51°44'48"W 7.50' L4 539°12'38"W 21.53' A. T. & S.F. Re R. 4..02°39'i 0" R.5779,66, � Jo 7 POD . SS-r i �� �p4 ' l3+��" R4 ••••,/ i 2 • N V Nd: rl it) 0 a% (Ni J Cs ti Sg. C1 1403k,T2 W PCJR+ LOT. I2--A ASSESSOR'S MAP POB NO. 31 AR 1 /•42-43 POL . 4 DOC NO. 2006- 0565691 0 . R . po , �`1 gp 5°6\'1-,(39 21 �1,F \-' $o S12j1 PROPOSED R!W p0. N78°58'24„W R�2000. a 131.00' p�16° a0L gal �'° S41 ° 19.57" Q 15.92' P08 TPOB (R) EXISTING R /W LEGEND Indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True Point Of Beginning Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State I(Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtein ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. .a ??, RN-1-E r-.M Cr.CV ho REEWAY 22275.6 J PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY: ' Hu+.ion [Cnire Drive Ste. d60 sc.,' eni° o, Cotitorn9p107 <714i751-7j11ti7.o154s-6:61 WOO DATE: 06-15-2012 DISTRICT 8 COUNT Rlv REV.: 2; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA::: Y SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS i 2 2 ROUTE SHEET PM 91 6.9 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 36 82 PS AS 1 EXHIBIT `G1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-7 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document 10 No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: t1 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line 14 of the Iand described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29,1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said 17 point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 18 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 18.22 feet through a central angle 20 of 05°03'17" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 28.54 feet to 21 a point on said general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a 22 non -tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial 23 line bears South 69°22'14" West; thence northerly along said curve and said general 24 southerly line 12.54 feet through a central angle of 28°44'54" to a point thereon; thence 25 South 81 °26'22" East 21.31 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in 26 said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve 27 concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears 28 South 59°49'01" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 15.89 29 feet through a central angle of 04°24'31" to the True Point of Beginning. 30 31 Containing 304 square feet. P:12PTG0105011SURVEYtLEGALS122275_APN_117-270-0071Legats122275-7-TCE.docx. Page 1 of 2 10/ 17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 37 83 PSO A 1 2 See Exhibit `G2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 3 4 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 5 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 6 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 7 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 8 9 10 Prepared under the direction of 14 12 13 14 -' Ms� f0-/7 lZ 15 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS122273 APN 117-2',0-0071Lega1s122275-7-TCE.docx Page 2 of2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 38 84 EXHIBIT G2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR I AREA APN 22275-7 TCE PEARL STREET PROP.I 304 SO. FT. ( _ 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 1 7 7_270'Goa 00 � O A. r S.F, R.Re 11y-300-a21 ,A. W 115-060-016 n• � tr 1 . --I oc Lij?CL. 2 1 DOC. NO. 2006-0565691 0.11. PGL. ! Pot.. 117-270-00611 1 _T POB-- �- ...... a_2. 7--------�--i.. 21-t•—� Kat ---- - - _ .,__ :=-----K-. R--. ;- - -"- = ---__ -_ - 1 40'34 -- -_ - ✓� I 2.14i pas 3Zo 1�2�2' 7-7) ---\\ 3G5 �--— I.` SHEET_2 _ J 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning 7P08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radio, Bearing C }Title to State 1 1 i i ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain �/ 2 2 2 ! 5 •- 7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. ter - FEET G 100 700 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Mut ion Centre Drive, Ste: 200 t2111t?751"a7373i(Tie)5ieria 5 92707 6663 (fart} DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: 0E540 FAit: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 71 6.9 1 - 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 39 85 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP PARCEL# 22275-7 k w ct TITLE T CE 30' Ct 14-1 Q O n 4 n; r co ,n z. LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 S81°26'22"E 21.31` LEGEND AREA 304 SOFT. A P N 117-270-007 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 25.00' 28°44'54' 12.54' C2 206.53' 04°24'31" 15.89' N81 40 40'38"11/ POB indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial 8eoring i Title to State 1 [ I I I Access Prohibited RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 S69°22'14"W R2 N81 ° 52'51 "W R3 S59°49`01"W PCL 2 2006-0565691 O. R POR , LOT 3; BL..UCX 73 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LANDAND WATER COMPANY Me 9/6 N81 °40'38„ w 212,14 PROAOS ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY PSO AS 3 Wttco Cm/re [rive, Sae. 2Lxi Scot* .vw, COi7/*rn:o 927oz 47r4):s,-7313,0,4AJ5-ese3 ikbo DATE: 06-15-.12 REV.: 10-17-.12 EA: OF540 FA#t DISTRICT 8 COUNTY R1`J ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 2 TOTAL SHEETS 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 40 86 PSO AS 1 2 EXHIBIT `ail' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-8 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1 and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'3 8" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having'a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 22.91 feet through a central angle of 20 07°26'09" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along said easterly line and said curve 18.72 feet through 22 a central angle of 06°04'33" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 83.19 feet to 23 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet; thence 24 easterly along said curve 294.53 feet through a central angle of 05°57'39'; thence North 25 59°49'50" East 46.06 feet; thence South 74°24'15" East 73.17 feet; thence South 26 87°22'34" East 66.13 feet; thence South 02°37'26" West 10.98 feet to the beginning of a 27 non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,839.00 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 00°57'28" East; thence easterly along said curve 20.04 feet 29 through a central angle of 00°24'16"; thence North 02°37'26" East 8.02 feet to the 30 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet, to 31 which point a radial line bears South 01 °22'25" East; thence easterly along said curve P:12PTGOIOSOASURVEY1LEGALS122275 APN 117-270.005 and 013 113.060fii3 and 015lLegals'22275-8-TCE.doex Page I 01'2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 41 87 8 9 10 PS O AS 1 278.36 feet through a central angle of 05°38'01" to a point on the easterly line of said 2 Parcel 1; thence South 41°19'57" Fast 6.07 feet along said easterly line to a point thereon, 3 said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radnus 4 of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 07°04`21" East; thence westerly s along said curve 20.99 feet through a central angle of 00°25'26"; thence South 41 °21'39" 6 East 8.50 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°44'59" East; thence westerly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence North 81 °26'22" West 68.83 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1 Containing 11,819 square feet. 12 13 See Exhibit'H2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Prepared under the direction of 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate' System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. /0-of--/2 Date PA2PTG0105011SUR.VEYN.EGAIS122275_APN f t 7-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and Of 511.egalst2.2275-8-TCE.doex Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 42 88 EXHIBIT 112 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11,819 SOFT. 117-270-005 8& 013 ? �0-004 T� 2 ~ 2 OC.I SHEET A. r,S. I I NO„ 2006-056569!I0.R. I PCL ~s. ( 6.3/66 - -_ _ SHEET INDEX SHEET 4 _ f ��► I � I f f'Cie'e, ----- -. : 3 F, R P.R. , 1 ___-__-----_- i I ��9'300- f I i __-- f117-270-003 I ,,T a ASHEET v, le PCL I 115-060-016 , PCL . FREEWAY l IQ- 1 f 7-270-aG6 -= ---i -_-_:; I - - _- � f --:-_ — � � T P08 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE P08 pe -----._. _:. t28 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point TP08 indicates True (R) Indicates Radial Of Beginning Point Of Beginning Bearing ( ) Title to State j 1 I i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES FEET 22, 2, 7 - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT .., _. - Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00i Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless oTherwise noted. .. t:._r 1 C 100 200 y 400 500 PREPARED 8Y: PSOMAS 3 Huf100 Conte* CrEra, Sty. 200 S 0i0 400, Coi.10,0t0 97707 171.)7St-+I73/i7111945-9053 (s00 RATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE - SHEET PM SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS 8 t R 1v 91 6.9 . 1 ' �1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 43 89 POR; LOY 3, Oi OCX 13 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND ANO WATER COMPANY MB 916 ?OR, PAL, 2 DOC. NO. 2006-- 0565691 D,R. _ r of TPOB L1 -�' v-05°57'39" R=283I1 .00' L=294.53' _ L 2 -- _ p-15°18`37" R=2843.00' i =759.69' -- POR. SECTION 30 T.39.; R,6W. RANCHO EL SO8RANTE me i ie PCL. I DOG, NO. 2006- °565691 O.R. EXHIBIT I-12 PARCEL# TITLEI GRANTOR AREA ;LPN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT. 117-270-005 & 013 w W PROPOSED R /'N S45°24'51 "W(R) (\ I! J 3 0 ao � 2 spiv NS1 °40'38"W EXISTING R/W CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH Cl 07°26'09" 176.53' 22.91' C2106°04'33" 176.53' 18.72' LEGEND P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) lndicotes Radio, Bearing C }Title to State 1 1 I 1 } access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0,99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 161.21• 123.15' -- N81°d0.38"W L INE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 L2 S81°26`22"E N81°26'22"W 83.19' 68.83° ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY / C/I. STATIONING 9 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 22275-8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 100 150 SEE SHEET PREPARED BY: 3 w+a+ran cemra Or;vf Sit. 200 Sonia Ana, Coritarnip 42703 (PIOM-?333/014i545•ee83 (F40 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: 0f 540 rAit DISTRICT ' COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 44 90 EXHI IT H2 PARCEL# ITITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 FCI . } D DC . NO, 2008- FOR, $ECTION 30 0585691 D.R. T.3S,; R.61. RANCHO RADIAL DATA EL SOBRANTE /a BEARING PAB } R.$, t53166 ------- R 1 R2 R3 S00° 57 "28"E S01 °21'44"E S01 °22'25"E 1 N59° 49'50"E '"` — -- _ S02°35.59"W (RI .._. ---`. SN024,15„ L4 R3 ° ©=05°57'39` 23.17 S87 22"34"E C4 _.--_ / � 66..1 3' R y2831 .00' �' 222'7 $11 - r � � L-294.53' , l L3 L ^755.59`� _ __ _ _ �A=15° 18'37" R=2843.04�' �- R2 i-- � `� i t_ _ 1�1--i _ t W Lei PROPOSED R/W C3 _ 0 - �" v1 ______ . ---- !alLU ul _— =16°40'20" R=2000.00' L-581.97' N81°40' 8w 123.15' EXISTING R/W w V/ LINE DATA CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH L3 L4 S02°37'26"W NO2°37'26"E 10.98' 8.02' C3 C4 00°24'16" 05°38'01" 2839.00' 2831.00' 20.04' 278.36' r4i ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C2 STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True. Point Of Beginning IR) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 { ?Title to State ill I 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99937476 to obtain 2 2 2 5 - . TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in fee' unless otherwise noted. - 3_ '-.argI FEET 4 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 ✓.y.t ton <erntro Urivt Sot. 200 Sai`o A. C077fornio 92707 {71dg7Si77373,971A;St5-5883 (%o.} DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS - 8 I RV 91 6,9 3 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 45 91 EXHIBIT 112 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 4 22275 8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP, 11$19 S©.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 re)�-- w ui w. N FOR R . SECT] ON T . 3S i R. nW RANCHO EL SOBRAN T E M13 I/8 PCL . 1 UDC , NO. 2006-- 056569I 0.t{. -- _--05°38'01" '' -L-15°183t PROPOSED .RfW 30 . F .S. 63/66 c07°00, • 2g1.OHf �R3r�9 `-- —2g43.0�p R= � PCL, 3 '- '� DOC. NO. 2006-'-. ``` i 565691 J.,R. 0'� , � (R. � 6.sE . 2 L -27a 36 - >r E tS06 -, 0, L�159.t o,59E(R1 $p64 A L-581 -97, c0$°,20.5g"E(Ft) RIVERS ICE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE °. •'' .- ' �, ' -- $4 1o � 6.07 � POR, LOT. ASSESSOR — NO. �• AAAB I ' .� •„ -,;-- --(jab, - 0565691 �.w7,.E `� °OA°21 o 25 2� p�00 R-2:657r 20.9' °539 sAt$0 N78°5804'.."` 12--A ' S MAP 31— /42- 43 PCL. 4 _ NO, 2006 -_ O.R. t— '� , E 24 w rREEwAY FREEWAY R,2p0O.a0 R/W 91 365 ,. 4_16° 40'20' EXISTING �Qu�� C/L STATIONING d F LEGEND POB Indicates TP08 Indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing to State Prohibited ( ) Title } 1 i 1 E Access NOTES 2 2 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FEET 0 25 50 7 5- EASEMENT Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain grouno distances. All distances are in feet'"' Unless otherwise noted. 100 150 PREPARED BY: J Hutson Cenire arivek Sic. 200. n;',:0 Ana. Ca:.{ornlo -141 ?7`At75i-7J3f(7t diS45-eP.BJ iso•1 DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FAu: DtSTR1CT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS1 O 8 7 I V 3 i 9 6. 4 l `1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 46 92 6/12/2013 .01111116., 1 pROJEcr OTIPS.,a Commission Request RCTC THE COMMISSION IS REQUESTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS : 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. n NORTH 1 EXPRESS LANES 1 WESTBOUND REGULAR LANES 1 EASTBOUND REGULAR LANES 1 6/12/2013 PARCEL 1 Pearl Street Properties, LLC FEE 41,252 *SF (lbw/ Parcel Arra 354321 SF) T Permanent Wall Foonna Easement 6,919 SF • r Temporary Construction Easement 1Z 123 SF no% , Permanent Utility Easement 6,191 SF .a; ...fan" , Efforts to Resolve Differences 91 .Jt ytw{tp • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on January 22, 2013. • The owner's attorney has not expressed any concerns or questions related to the project's design. • RCTC has attempted to negotiate a settlement however the property owner's attorney has requested that we go directly to a Resolution of Necessity. 2 6/12/2013 Efforts to Resolve Differences RCTC 91 pROJECTr f.2.11-,,..� • On February 11, 2013, owner's legal counsel sent RCTC a letter (dated 2/1/13) declining RCTC's offer to acquire, stating that they "strongly urge RCTC to adopt a Resolution of Necessity and promptly file an eminent domain action': • All efforts to settle have been rebuffed. Parcel 2 Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona A NORTH I EXPRESS LANES WESTBOUND REGULAR LANES EASTBOUND REGULAR LANES 3 6/12/2013 PARCEL 2 The Redevelopment Agency of the a of Corona FEE 4,4 8 SF ( otal Parcel Area 16,553 SF) Permanent Wall Footing Easement 1,631 SF Temporary Construction Easement 1,907 Sl Efforts to Resolve Differences ,j PRoJecr rr r+ra RCTG • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on December 27, 2012. • Due to dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies in the State of CA eminent domain is necessary to acquire title to this property. 4 n NORTH N EXPRESS LANES i WESTBOUND REGULAR LANES I EASTBOUND REGULAR LANES 6/12/2013 MP' Efforts to Resolve Differences ROTC 91 pROJEcT Man dm.-- • The offer Just Compensation was presented on April 27, 2012. The offer was the full appraised value of the property. • Since offer was made 21 meetings or phone calls were made to the owner or his attorney attempting to negotiate a settlement. There were many more attempts to communicate with the property owner. No settlement was reached. • In early April 2013 the owner's attorney indicated that they contacted RCTC's legal counsel to directly negotiate with them. ,"-'` 91 PROJECT 1 1t N.wa.p Staff Recommends: RCTC THE COMMISSION ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. 6 INDIAN WELLS (760) 568-26I 1 IRVINE (949) 263-2600 LOSANGELES (21 3) 61 7-8100 ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, P.O. BOX 1028, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 PHONE: (95 1) 686-1450 ( FAX: (95 1) 686-3083 ( WWW.BBKLAW.COM MARGARET L. BARNES (95 I ) 826-8357 MARGARET. BARN ES@BBKLAW.COM May 28, 2013 Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 SACRAMENTO (916) 325.4000 SAN DIEGO (619) 525-1300 WALNUT CREEK (925) 977-3300 WASHINGTON, DC (202) 785-0600 VIA HAND DELIVERY MAY 20 2013 D' RIVERSIDE COUNTY Re: Original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners of TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Resolution of Necessity Hearing Scheduled for June 12, 2013 RCTC/SR91 Corridor Improvements Project Property Ownership: Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, APN 117-270-002 (CPN 22273) Dear Jennifer: Attached is the original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners, with proof of mailing, of the hearing on the Resolutions of Necessity scheduled for June 12, 2013. The original Notice for the late addition (approved by Caltrans) was mailed on May 24, 2013. It will be necessary for you to note the proof of mailing of the Notices at the hearing. The documents needed for the hearing (Resolutions of Necessity, Agenda Report, Memorandum from Legal Counsel) have been provided in draft form to Gina Gallagher for her review and revision. She will provide the finalized versions to your prior to the hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, 41 a Margare/CL. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachment copy: Gina Gallagher, Senior Right of Way Agent (w/copy of Attachments, via e-mail only) 17336.02100\7987553.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7967487.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, ri Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: May 24, 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP n 1 CM Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7967487.1 FEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Those portions of Lots 37, 39 and 40 and all of Lot 38 of Block "B" of Lands of the South Riverside Land and Water Company, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside; State of California, as said lots and block are shown on map on file in Book 9 page(s) 6 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, California, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard, 100 feet wide, with the Westerly line of Pearl Street, 60 feet wide, said point also being the Southeasterly corner of that certain 1.97 acres parcel of land described in deed to State of California recorded July 2, 1959 in Book 2502 page(s) 338 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; Thence along the boundary line of said 1.97 acre parcel the following courses: North 8° 13' 53" East (bearing assumed for purpose of this description) along said Westerly line, also being the Easterly line of said Block "B" 441.03 feet; Thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears South 8° 13' 53" West, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet through a central angle of 100° 08' 07" a distance of 43.69 feet; Thence North 71 ° 36' 00" West tangent to the proceeding curve 130.72 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 40, last said point being the true point of beginning for the parcel herein described; Thence Westerly along the arc of a curve tangent to the proceeding course, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1030.00 feet through a central angle of 7° 01' 15", a distance of 126.21 feet; Thence Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears North 73° 39' 15" West, concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 35.00 feet through a central angle of 86° 46' 02" a distance of 53.00 feet to a point in the Westerly line of said Lot 39, last said Westerly line also being the Easterly line of Joy Street, 60 feet wide; Thence North 1 ° 06' 47" East, leaving the boundary line of, said 1.97 acre parcel along the Westerly line of said Lots 37, 38 and 39 a distance of 144.42 feet; Thence South 74° 19' 02" East 159.63 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 37; Thence South 8° 06' 47" West along the Easterly line of said Lots 37, 38, 39 and 40, a distance of 173.05 feet to the true point of beginning. APN: 117-270-002 17336.02100\7978167,1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 POR. C(TY OF CORONA (POR. SEC. 30 T3S.R. 6 W, 9 POR SOUTH R/V LAND i1N0 WATER CO. I 4 MltalfgY • \ :i /J JTS�dC., 1 lawa�e Lam. �T <� R1V£Rtl \ r F AY RT. 9/ � ~"` `? ) �f Lot 3 �� r/e Poa-is-rot- // w '9\ �- r far B/R. 73 � ,.,r,e l2 \\ ??'t \ GI A MY YM CI PLw R,.Q/PI R, H/,/ ASSESSORS MAP BK. //7 PG. 27 RIVERS/OE CYXINTY CAL/f. Lot M rR A. are ASS M B 9/6, B S.B. Soda Riverside Land B Water Co. A. M. B. //42- 43 Assessor Map No. 3/ P.M. 23/70 // 7 —27 P- �S S£Pr. /974 il P Zoe CEIV7M"M 611:11==r1LT ©17�ri�i iveirzITZWsa MIIIIR3lm Q� ���7 oziervirmis 11111111♦1♦ EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-270-002 (CPN 22273): Santiago Rodriguez Record Owner 2210 North Main Street, Suite B Santa Ana, CA 92705 Jorge L. Rodriguez Record Owner 2210 North Main Street, Suite B Santa Ana, CA 92705 Charles Krolikowski, Esq. Courtesy Copy Newmeyer & Dillion, LLP 895 Dove Street, 5th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 DATED: May 24, 2013. Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7967487.1 INDIAN WELLS (760) 568-261 1 IRVINE (949) 263-2600 L.OS ANGELES (2 1 3) 61 7-8 100 ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 I M� BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW SACRAMENTO (91 6) 325-4000 SAN DIEGO (6 1 9) 525-1 300 WALNUT CREEK (925) 977-3300 3390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, P.O. BOX 1028, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 PHONE: (95 1) 686-1 450 1 FAx: (95 1) 686-3083 1 MARGARET L. BARNES (95 I ) 826-8357 MARGARET. BARN ES@ B B KLAW. COM April 29, 2013 Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 HINGTON, DC 785-0600 APR 2 9 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION OOMMISSION VIA HAND DELIVERY Re: Original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners of Resolution of Necessity Hearing Scheduled for June 12, 2013 RCTC/SR91 Corridor Improvements Project Property Ownership: Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNS 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-260-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 (CPN 22275) Property Ownership: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona, APN 102-020-044 (CPN 22111) Property Ownership: Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., APN 102-270-010 (CPN 22111) Property Ownership: HAGF Enterprises, LLC, APN 117-070-029, CPN 22249) Property Ownership: Nicola-Lampkin; APN 118-040-021 (CPN 22153) Property Ownership: Tressen, APN 118-160-021 (CPN 22192) Dear Jennifer: Attached are the original Notices of Hearing to Property Owners, with proofs of mailing, of the hearing on the Resolutions of Necessity scheduled for June 12, 2013. The original Notices were mailed on April 26, 2013. It will be necessary for you to note the proofs of mailing of the Notices at the hearing. The remaining documents needed for the hearing (Resolutions of Necessity, Agenda Report, Memorandum from Legal Counsel) will be provided in draft form to Gina Gallagher for her review and revision. She will provide the finalized versions to your prior to the hearing. 17336.02100\7910755.1 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission RE: RCTC/SR91 CIP, RON Hearing of June 6, 2013 April 29, 2013 Page 2 Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, "/,7 te-t )61,totet_ MargarL. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachment copy: Gina Gallagher, Senior Right of Way Agent (w/copy of Attachments, via e-mail only) 17336.02100\7910755.1 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF CONTINUED HEARING Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The descriptions of the property to be acquired are defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A," attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 17336.02100\7886312.1 4 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: 1Vlaijk A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17 3 3 6.02100\7 8 86312.1 i Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission; "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to <RCTC, absolute ownership of the.. property. "Access Easement" refers to an non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns,together with the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction site, as determined" necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant ;trees or any other vegetation on any portion' of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns., RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other; vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation: No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent of RCTC, ; Property Owner shall not cause,; directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with. or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC;' including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. '"Temporary construction easement (TCE) refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement' rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours 17336,021 7868203.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to ROTC, including its successors and assigns, a;,permanent and perpetual, easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove, at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limitedto sewers, : water, electrical 'systems and communication systems, consisting _ wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, ' manholes, handholds, , and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by ROTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not: erect or construct, or permit to, be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of ROTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to :utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. ROTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined ;in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 17336.021=7888203 i EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 S� EXHIBIT `AI: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltlrans Parcel No. 22275=1 5 Fee Aeouisitigp 6 APN 117-270-007' 7 8. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17' 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Containing 130 square feet 29 30 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel'2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly coiner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'3r West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation enteredSeptember 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified. Copy thereof being' recorded October 4,1915 in Book 427, Page282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point being the True point of Beginning; thence North 81'40'38" West 19.65 feet . continuing along said general southerly line to the beginning of a curve concave:: northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 15.87 feet through a central angle of 36°21'56"; thence South 81 °26' 22" East 29.38 feet to a point on said westerly line, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 52°17'05" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle :of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning. 31 j See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. PA2PTG010501\SURVEYILEGALS22275A APN 117-270-0071Legals122275-1-Fee.docx 10/17/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AS This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and, the Grantor herebyreleases and relinquishes to the Gramce any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based' on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476`. Prepared under the direction of IQ"/712 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date P:12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275 APN 117-270-00711,ega1s122275-1-Fee.docx Page 2 of 2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 FEE EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL*: TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275 1..::. 117-270-003(;: PEARL .,STREET PROP. 130 SO. FT. Jana NO; 2006-056569 J 0, R, PCL. ) 'SHEET LEGEND P08 indicates Point Of Beginning:... TPOB indicates True Point of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing. C )Title to Stote 1 11 i (Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1963(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are griddistances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distonces ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 11.7-270-:007. 115-06g-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY: C/L STATIONING PREPARED BY: QS O M A S 3 Muiten Centre ar:re Ste. 200 Sonic Ana, Coi:forn:a 92707 t71U751-73737(7u1545-C493. Wax) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R1V 91 6.9 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5' PARCEL* 22275-1; TITLE FEE EXHIBIT A2 GRANTOR AREA PEARL STREET PROP 130: SQ.FT.. A P N 117-270-�007::.:: POR. LOT,,3i gLOOX 7,3 SOUTI.1 Ri VERSI DE LAND AND WATER COMPANY M.8 9./ 6 i., a tu 0 4 r� 0° A27 (i) PCL 2 DOC. NO. 2006- 0565691 U . R . cc vcr IQ so M , 1 • . cv o, co zy) a©a 1 z oo, 0 a..o„� oa d` g°51 ,1 Q„ v' a' _- �1- o6' 1 t 0.1 \ 14°41 .� 8111(0) 4=36°21 ,56,t R'25.80, (24 LEGEND Pop indicates Point Of Beginning -POB Indicates True Paint Of Beginning (R) indicates Rodio! Bearing.: Title to State I ! I 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore On CCS 1963(2007.00i Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are In 'fleet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED Dr: PSOMAS 1 rturron Cent,* Wee Ste, Hq Santa erro Coiirorrio ✓12707 171 Q 751 < 3734 71e15e 5-0993. 1104 DATE:6-15-12 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREE WA Y 222 -1 FEE 'ACOU1SITION FEET 0 10 20 40 REV.: 10-17-12. EA: ©F540 ROUTE SHEET PSI EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 SHEET ..:N NO. 60 FA#: :. . SHEETS 2 2 3 4 5... 6 7 8 9 10 1t EXHIBIT `g1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No.22275-2 Fee Acquisition APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 12 Beginning at the' southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West. 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly lime 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29,1915,;:in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said. 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28"; thence South .81 °26'22" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave :. 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41°20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve: 25 : 165.85 feet through a central angle of 03 °20'58"; thence North02°32'29" East 95.94 feet 26 to a point on the general northerly line of said Parcel 4, said point being the beginning of 27 a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 5;779.66 feet, to which point. a 28 radial line bears South 13° 11'22" West; thence easterly along said northerly line the . 29 following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 30 00°45'34" and 2) South 77'34'12" East'140.88 feet to the northeasterly corner of said 31 Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 73.97 feet along the general easterly line of said P:UPTG9105011SURVEYII.EGA1S22275_APN_I17-2711435and 013.115460-013and 015ltegals122275-2-fEErdocx Page 1of3 I W9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 PS AS Parcel 4 to; the southeasterly comer thereof and the beginning of a non _tangent curve 2 concave northwesterly having a radius of I ,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 3 South 18'23'16" East; thence westerly along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4- 4 and along said curve 199.21 >feet through a central angle of 05°51'11" to the most 5 southerly comer thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; 6 thence South 41 °19'57" East 15.92 feet along said northeasterly line to the most easterly 7 corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78°58'24" 8 West 131.00 feet to: the most easterly .comer of said Parcel I, said point being the 9 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to 1 o which point a radial line bears South 08°20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly 1 t line of.said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses: I} along said curve 58197 feet 12 through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40'38" West 123.15 feet to the 13 Poird of Beginning. 14 15 Containing 51,953 square feet. 16 17 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 18 and relinquishes to the Urantee any and all abutter's rights or ac:cess,.appurtenant to 19 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 20. 21 :. See Exhibit 4132''attached hereto and made a part hereof 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are basedon California Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may obtained by dividing 25 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described . The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 27 28 29 30 31 P32PTG010501LSURVEMEGALSt22275 APN 11 .270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 0151Leaals122215-2.FEE.doet Page 2 of 3 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 P:12PT00105011SURVEVIL-EGAL.S122275_APN 117-270-005 and 013_1 iS-060-0i3 and 015U.egals122275-2-FEE:docx Page 3 of 3 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 PARCEL# tt7-270-003 ROUTE 91 TITLE EXHIBIT B2 GRANTOR AREA APN 115-060-013 & 015 117-2:70-005 & 013.. L115-060-01 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE91 RIVERSIDE 'FREEWAY Crt STATIONING LEGEND P013 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of 9eginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Titre to State ill It Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al! distances "are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET _0 :00 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: P ® AS 3 Hutton Centre. Oriva Ste. 5OO Some Mo talirern:o S27O7 t714051•7373/014150.8$83 front DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 1. 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 EXHI PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR. AREA' APN 22275-2 W ct :) Ct a PROPOSED FEE PEARL STREET PROP. PDR .LOT 3, BLOCK 7d sou-ri-i RI VERS I DE LAND AND'14ATER COMPANY MB 9/6 51,:953 SO. FT. FOR POL. 2 DOO. NO, ::.2006- 0565691 O.R. S81°26'22"E. 57.22.' ©-1 5°25'16" R=2851.00` L=767.34'� 115-.060-013 & 015 117,-2.70-005< & '013:: POE?. SECTION: 30 T .aS . `' fi! . 61N. RANCHO EL SOBRANTE AAS 110::: :. . PC,L.. 1' 000. No. 2006- -`' 0565691O.R. �o``� N81 Q 40'38"W 161.21 � 1 N81°40'38"W o ,� EXISTING R/W POB 123.1 5 0' co 0, 0 (22.�'75_2. LEGEND P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning IR1 Indicates Radial Bearing. Title to State ) I I 1 I ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6.'Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unaees otherwise noted. I `i T ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 77 STATIONING 9 PREPARED BY: PS O M A S 3 Nut ton <entr• 0rt.10gea. 260 Tonto Ana, Catla ifarn232707 (710751.737311714)545-6443 !Foal - DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA:t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 X IBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN cv w w z w N 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. POR. SECTION 30 T.3S. , R.blk. RANCHO EL SOSRANTE PAS I'S �N81 ° 40`38"W 1 23.15' LEGEND FOB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State' HI I i I Access Prohibited ( ) NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet Unless otherwise noted. 51,953:SO. FT..: a=2851.00' 11.5-060-013 & 015 117-270--005 & 013 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Clz STATIONING `Zr SEE SHEET PREPARED BY: PSO AS 3 Rueeon Ceotre Or We Ste. 200 Sa"ta An., c0lifaroi0 92707 �'. (71417S-/373i17t7i949.0803 Mix) DATE:'06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET ,PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 3 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 ( ) PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA. A P N 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET.... PROP. 51,953 SO. FT.: 115-060-0.1.3 &`015 1t7-270-005 & 013 17UR , SECT I ON 30' T,38 • R'.b411. RANCHO EL < 8D8RANTi✓ MB 1/8 PCL.. 1 DOC. NO 2006 ,� o :56`tE (R) t�b5691 J }7 S06 3$ PCL . 3�`� DOC N0. 200 �. 056569.R. SOP SO •GOC;.NO. 0565 691..: • P:200 LEGEND Pfle indicates Paint Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing;:.: Title to State Access. Prohibited '• ?DR . LOT 12-A- ASSE88DR .'S hAAP. ND.'31 AIMS 1./42-43 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 19830007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ail distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 22275 2 FEE ACQUISITION. 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 2 Hutton Contra 0riva, Sta. 200 Sonto ono COO/Ornio 12707 (71,11}751-7317r171415A$-8803 WOO DATE:06-1 5-2012 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF 540 FA*: D1STR1CT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 4 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 P ARCELtt 22275-2 TITLE FEE EXHIBIT B2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. '22 49 (R) R- 45,3q' 5779.E LEGEND PQ8 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning: (R) Indicates Radio! Bearing { Title to State 1 III l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) 2one 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. AREA 5i 953.SO. FT..:: APN; 115-060-013 &:01..5:` 1 17-270 005 : & 0>13 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING FEET 0 25 50 1©0 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Murton Contra Dr1.r SU. 200 Santo Arlo Loilmen:a kt/or (714(758.7)3),(7141515.6e93 Iro44 DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM 8 RIV 91. 6.9 SHEET NO._ 5 TOTAL SHEETS 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14. 2 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-3 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document 10 No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'3r West 13 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29,1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said 17 point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 18 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21' 13" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a;central angle of 20 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°26'22" West 29.38 feet to a 21 point on the general southerly line, of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a 22 non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a 23 radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said 24 general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to'a point thereon; 25 thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land 26 described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non- 27 tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said 29 westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03°07'25" to the True Point of 30 Beginning. 31 P:12PTG0105011SURVEY\LEGALS122275 APN_117-270-0071Legals122275-3-PE.docx Page 1 of 2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 2' 3 1 See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1I Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 15 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00'epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALSt22275 APN_117-270-0071Lega1s122275-3-PE.docx Page 2of2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 16 PARCEL* 22275-3 117-270-0031 TITLE ESMT EXHIBIT C2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET. PROP. AREA 235 SO. FT. I DOC. NO. 2006-0565691 O.R, POL. 21 PCL. 1 006 1 R.S. 1 .. -. -.. -L.. w.... ,ice ------ . - W81 1240a 4'3$' 1. L SHEET 2 j ROUTE 91 R1 VERSIDE LEGEND P06 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP013 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( Title to State ! 1 1 i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. APN 1'17.-270-007 : 11.5-060-016 ROUE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C!L S TA TIONIND PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutfan Centre Oriw Ste. 200 Soma Ana catitornie 92707 (71-4)791-7373/0u,9e9-0007:t�ox► DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 £A: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT. COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS S RIV 91 6.9 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17 PARCEL## 2227573 TITLE ESMT EXHIBIT C2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP POB Indicates Point Of Beginning, TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning CR) indicates Radial Bearing C Title to State I I t I Access Prohibited AREA 235 SO.FT. A'PN 117-270-.007 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA :: LENGTH: C1< 25.00' ` 24°40'57" 10.77' C2 206.53' 03°07'25" 1'.1.26' FOR LOT 3> BLOCK 73 SOUTH RI VERS1 DE ► ACID AND WATER COMPANY MIS 9/6 ROUTE 91 RI VERS IDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6: Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PS MAS' 7 Hutton centre Dr4e ste. ?on Sonia AM. Co6fornio WO7 571ai7St-7171t(114 S-!643 lfnxi DATE:6-15-12 DISTRICT 8 REV.: 10-17-12 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 EA:OF540 FA*: SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 2 TOTAL SHEETS 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 PS s 2 3 4 Cakraus Parcel No. 222754 5 Permanent Wall Footint: Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 EXHIBIT' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8 1n the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recordedAugust 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, m 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County,' said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42 West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 02°51'28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point' of Beginning; thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet through a central angle of 04°34'41"; thence South 81°26'22" East 68.83 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15 ° 18'37"; thence South 25 41°19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 26 having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point'a radial line bears South 06°51'381' least 27 thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence 28 North 81 °26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 29 30 Containing 6,614 square feet. 31 P12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALSl22275 APNJ 17-270.005 and 013_115-060413 and 015ULegals122275-4-PE.doex 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 Page 1 oft See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Prepared under the direction of 9 10 --� 11 . _ 7 �h '1,h 12 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 13 14 15_ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 The distances described herein are, grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone,6, 2007.00 epoch. Grounddistances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2P1120105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN 117-270-005 and 013 l 15-060-013 and 0151Laga1s‘22215-4-PE.docx 10/9/2012 Pap 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20 1 PARCEL* 117-270-003 TPOB EXHIBIT D2. GRANTOR 36.0 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 1�9-300'a21 30 1197060, 16 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State j I I 1 l Access Prohibited ) NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide. by 0.99997476 to obtain ground . distances. Ati distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 40© 110 600 PREPARED BY: P S 0 M A S 3 t?utton Centre W.* Ste. 20.3 San+a ono Coi.61711e iYlOr 7ti1751-'�3731(71� 1545.8981.(ioai OATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OFS40 FAsi: DISTRICT s COUNTY RIY ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 1 TOTAL SHEETS, 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 21 w PARCEL' 22275-4. PROPOSED R!W C2 TITLE ESLIT GRANTOR PEARL STREET :PROP. PU?. LOT. Sit BLOCK 73 sou TH '' RI VERS1 DE LAND AND WA'TER'CUMFANY MO 9/6 AREA 6614 ;SO.FT. PDF7.. POL 2. DOC. NO. '2006�- °565691 0. Fi S45°24'51"W(R) S40°50'10'W(R) CURVE DATA DELTA < FRADIUS LENGTH Cl 02°51'28" 176.53' 8.81' C2 04°34 41 n 1 76.53' 14.1 0' C3 15°25'16" 2851.00' 767.34' LEGEND PO8 TPOB (R) ) Indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True PointOf Beginning Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State 1 L I 1 I Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 A'PN 117-270-005 84 013 POI?.. SECTI ON :30; T.36. , R btu RANCHO EL soaRAN-rz MB Ila 000 1\10. 2006 0565691 O.R. L INE DATA BEARING DISTANCE. L1 L2 S81 °26'22t'E N81°26'22"W 68.83' 57.22' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA. STATIONING RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are infeet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT T_ -. mmimmo FEET 0 25 50 PREPARED BY: PSOMA'S 3 Hutton Centre Orly*, Ste. 200 Sento Aro Colifornio 04707 (7i41751-737311714)S4S-8003 tFe.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA:OF5,10 FAts: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RI,/ ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 22 PARCEL# 22275-4 TITLE ESMT GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. AREA 6614 SO.FT'. APN 1.17-270-005& 01 3 N u_l w 2 vl w W v'a r�art. SF.cYlON 30 '1'.:3.8 R.6►H. R.ANCHU , EL SOEIRANTE M9 1/d 1 �t 4=15° 18'.37" R.S. 63166 PROPOSED' R/W p=15°251161' 4= 16° 40'20" N81 °40'3$'(ty 123.1S• R=2843.00' R=2851.00' 'GL. I DOC .'' NO. 2006- • 0565691 O.R. •` 2,2 75'' q R=2000.001 EXISTING R/W .` 759469 ` ...----- L=.761 r L=581.97' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB lndicotes Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing; 3 Title to State; ill l l Access Prohibited t 2 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STA N N ` �63 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CC5 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distonces and stationing ore grid distances Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT PREPARED 8Y: P O Mi 3 Huston Centre Grive, sie- :•00 Soho *no. Colifornso 97707 (/ 10731.737347$ 4131S-8883' { rok l DATE06-15.12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PEA 6.9 . SHEET NO. 3 TOTAL SHEETS 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 23 EX PARCEL#, TITLE GRANTOR, AREA AP>N 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SOOT. 117-270-005»& 013 PORT . L.OT . 12-A FOR, SECTION 30 ASSESSOR' S MAE_ _ _ T.38.,R.6W. _ --- 110. 3I— i=t. sOaGHO PCL. 3,f �" Aim 1 /42-45 ) A00C . NO. 2006�- PCL . ' 9 'J `� laAG 112 056569I G.R. --DOC. NO. 2006-_ Z.S. 63/bb f ®-- 056569I> 0.R.> PCL. 1 l ..- DOC. NO, 2006- � °565691 U. R. f '' • r poQ3° 1 rj° 26�1 ,--'" .. + R i 2$A2.Q0 *-' 06°A3 "- -- 07 ✓ R�-161 ••'6 ® ! ..- Ali .� ,� -- -' , '.+.fir 9. 71 ' PROPOSED R /W M a-- -~ r7 S9.6g" _ -- =-.j g;37"r`'-:. .00 L Q ' __...-.- ®71 _. L -7 67.3 2g51.44 °51 ,3g�" (R) 25.16" W.:S06 S41>o t 9`57'"E 12.13 w p_15° L2227'5-:4 gg1.97� td7g� 1.00 w IA cn , l.- 58'2q" ° 40,2C" R-:: 00 Oao 0,59"E.I. -------- A.16 S 2 EXISTING R/W F(�EEAY W 1 RrVERSI®E �Q�TE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 1' 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Paint Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing I. }Title to State, 1 I I 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 19B342007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 7 - PERMANENT WALL ,FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in fleet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 154 PR£PAREO BY: A S 3 Mutton Centre °rive, Ste. 200 - Santo 0.no C®titarro:e 92707 (784)74i-7773rt71-1M49-2003 tta.t DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 4 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 24 7 8 9 10 11 PSOI Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-5 Permanent Access Easement' APN 115-060-013, 015 and''117-270-005, 013 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38"West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 ofDeeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 83.74' feet through a' central angle of 20 27°10'45" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along last said curve and said easterly line 29.96 feet 22 through a central angle of 09°43'31" to a point thereon; thence South 80°17'36" Fast 23 46.41 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 224.00 feet; 24 thence easterly along said curve 24.60 feet through a central angle of 06°17'32"; thence 25 South 86°35'08" East 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a 26 radius of 1,686,00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 151.42 feet through a central 27 angle of 05°08'45" to the beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a 28 radius of 500.00 feet•, thence easterly along said curve 63.00 feet through a central angle 29 of 07° 13'08"; thence South 74° 13'16 East 50.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 30 northerly having a radius of 350.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 65.39 feet 31 through a central angle of 10°42'19" to the beginning of a compound curve concave P:12PTGOIOSOKSURVEMEOALS122275„APN 117-270-005 and 013_115-060.013 and 0ISU.egals12227S-5-Access.doax page I of 3 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 25 PSO AS 1 northerly having a radius of 1,432.00 feet; thence easterly alongsaid curve 137.16 feet 2 through a central angle, of 05°29'16" to the beginning of a compound curve concave: 3 northerly having a radius of 375.00, feet; thence easterly along said curve 169.53 feet 4 through a central angle of 25'54'09" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave 5 southerly having a radius of 325.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 154.43 feet 6 through a central angle of 27°13'30' thence South 89°05'30" East 63.16 feet; thence 7 South 021'32'29" West25.01 feet; thence North 891'0510 West 62.45 feet to the 8 beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence westerly' 9 along said curve 142.55 feet through a central angle of 27°13'30" to the beginning of a 10 reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along i 1 said curve 180.83 feet through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a 12 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 1457.00 feet; thence westerly 13 along said curve 114.83 feet through a central angle of 04°30'56"'to the beginning of a 14 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 15 said curve 80.25 feet through a central angle of 11 °29'40' ; thence North 74°24' 15" West 16 34.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; 17 thence westerly along said curve 35.97 feet through a central angle of 05°09'10" to the 18 beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a radius of 1660.00 feet; 19 thence westerly along said curve 203.64 feet through a central angle of 07°01'43"; thence 20 North 86°35'08" West 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 21 radius of 250.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 27.46 feet through a central angle 22 of 06°17'32' thence North 80°17'36" West 31.59 feet to the True Point of Binning. 23 24 Containing 26,164 square feet. 2s 26 See Exhibit 1E2' aftached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California' Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch_ Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PT00105011S11AVEYILEGALS122275_APN 117-270-00S and 013_115460.013 and 0141Legals122275-5-Acoass.docx page 2 of 3 I0KJV2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 26 2' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Prepared under the direction of P:12PTG0105011SURVEY1LEGA13122275 APN_I 17-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and OIS1Lega1s122275-5-Aeasa.docx page 3 of 3 1019/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 27 PARCEL*. 22275-5 L TPOB TITLE PAE EXHIBIT E2 GRANTOR PEARL. STREET PROP. } 360 AREA 26,164 SO. ET. 115-060-013 & 01.5; 117-270-005;& 013 ROUTE 9] RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 'RIVERSIDE FREEWAY. C/I. STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point OfBeginning TP08 indicates True Paint Of Beginning (R) indicotes Radio! Bearing Title to State 1 II 1 (Access Prohibited } NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0. 100 200 4 09 600 PREPARED BY: A S 3 Hutton Centre Grive See. 200 Sento 270 (71A)75 r�i371,0t4J545Corifonki Adee3 RFo.S DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAat DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 •: 1 •. 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 28 PARCEL* 22275-5 TITLE- PAE GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. Pail, LOT 3; SLOON 73 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND .NATER COMPANY MS,, 9/6 PROPOSED R/W IT E2 AREA 26,164 SO.. FT. POR. POL. 2, DOC.NO 2006 d565691 O.R, EXISTING R/W CURVE DATA DELTA, RADIUS LENGTH Cl 27°10'45" 176.53' 83.74' C2 09°43'31" 176.53' 29.96' C3 06° 1 7'32" ''224.00' 24.60' C14 06°17'32" 250.00' 27.46' LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radio, Bearing Title to State I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and Stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 'ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. APN' 1.15-060-013 & 015 1 1 7- 270-005'' & 01' 3 T 3S..; R.6W, RANCHO EL SOBRANTE M8 1>/8 PCL. 1 ._-DOC. NO. 2006 0565691 0. it' :...._ LINE DATA', BEARING DISTANCE L1 S8O°17'36"E 46.41' L5 N80°17'36"W 31.59'' R1 S65°09'27"W R2 574°52'58"W ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY / CA. STATIONING E PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT PREPARED BY: PSO AS Hutton Centro Oriva, Ste. 200 Spntd An* 4olli/ornia 9270? (714)751-7373/0141545•eee3 00.1 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: -3; 10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV' 91 _6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 29 • EX T E2 SEE SHEET 2 PARCEL# 22275-5. TITI_E PAE GRANTOR PEARL STREET ;PROP. POR. SEGT1'UN 30 T.38.; R.6W. RANCHO EL .SOBRANTE M )/8 p=16°40'206 N81 e40'386W 123.15' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY AREA 26,164 SO. FT. APN 115-060-013 & 01:.5. 117-270005 & 013: PCL. 1 DOC.: NO. 2006. 0565.691 O.R. EXISTING R/W PROPOSED R/W CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C4 051'08145" 1686.00' 151.42' C5 07° 13'08" 1 500.00' 63.00' C6 10642'196 350.00' 65.39' C7 05°29'166 1432 00' 1-37.16' C8, 25654'09" ; 375.00' _ 169. 53' LEGEND PoB Indicates Point Of Beginning, TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Rodiol Bearing C Titie to State i HI I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6: Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PSO AS 3 mutton Crntra Drive Ste. 700 Soa,o Ana, Coliforni0 92707 11141755-7373/1710545.8003 (r0x) CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C9 25654 `09" _ 400,00' 180.83' C10 04630'56** 1457.00' 114.8 ' C1'1 ' 11°29'40" 400.00' 80.25' C12 05°09'10" L100.00' 35.97' C13 07°01'43" 1660.00' :203.64' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 22275-5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 100 : 150 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA:OF540 FA*: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 3 TOTAL SHEETS 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 30 e PARCEL# 22275-5 TITLE PAE E.XIII GRANTOR PEARLSTREET PROP. . `I' E 2 AREA 26,164 S.Q.:F T. APN 115 060-013 & 015 117 `270-005 &< 01. 3 SEE SHEET 3' POR. SECT I ON ;:30 T.38., >R 61/1. RANrH0 EL SOBRAN fE MEI ;I / 8 PCL. 1 DOC. NO. 2006- 056569I O:R4 d 25 PCL.. ' 3 DOC. NO, 2006.- 0565691 O.R. R ..S'.. :-'o yg109 R=.`1O PROPOSED R/W fl�16° 40'20" i 63/66 r+: R=200Q.00 EXISTING R'/W LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L2 S89°05'30"E - 63.16' L4 N89°05'301'W 62.45' FOR. LOT ...:..I<2-A ASSESSOR'S MAP NO. 31 AMB I142`43 °13 , 6,21 • PCL. 4 DOG. 0565641O.R. L^5g1 F REEVIAY RIWERSI1"E Rpl1YE 9� - cT ROUTE 9 FREEWAY 0 coo !o 131,00' N78°58'24-w �n LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB ,Indicates True Paint Of Beginning. (a) Indicates Rodial Beoring C ) Title to Stote- Hi i ) i Access Prohibited 6 i NOTES, Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6.'Distances and stationing, are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997416 to obtain ground distances All distances ore 'in::feet unless otherwise noted. 227.5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nwrter centre Dr40 Ste. 200. Soma Ana. C0,1,04100 92707 {714j751.2373,0'41545.0003Ylf0.$ DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: 0E 540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEE T NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 I 6.9 4 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 31 PARCEL* w w to 22275 5 .41 a-00° 4 5' 34" R=57 79.66' .� L=76.62 TITLE PAE EXH BIT E2:. GRANTOR STREET PROP. PCL'.. 4 DOC.. NO. .:.2006- 0565691 O.R. LEGEND AREA 26,164 SO. FT. APN - 115-060=013<&. 015: 1,17-270-005 &.;.013 LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L2 589°05'30HE 63.16` L3 S02°32'29"W 25.01' E4 89°05'30'4 62.45' 11.5.. 63/66 POB indicotes Point Of Beginning. TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (10 Indicates Radial- Bearing t Title to State Li 1 I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain, ground distances. Ali distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: ?SOMAS 3 AQttan centre Qriw Ste. 2(o) Santa Ana COlirpfnia 4i707 (71.)751-7373117141545.Seel (fax) ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE :.FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 22275-5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT 0 25 50 109 . DATE: 06-15-12 Rev.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 32 SHEET PM 6,9 SWEET N 5 i50 FAIL:... Q. TOTAL SWEETS 5 EXHIBIT `F1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275.6 5 Permanent Utility Easement 6 APN 1`15-060-013 & 015 i 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Docunnent No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence along the general northerly 13 tine thereof the following two (2) courses: I) North 77°34'12" West 140.88 feet to the 14 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 and 2) westerly along 15 said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 00°45'34" to a point thereon; thence 16 South 02°32'29" West 95.94 feet to the beginning of a nomangent curve concave 17 northerly having a radius of 2,837.00' feet, to which point a radial line bears South t8 09°59'54" East; thence westerly along said curve 73.33 feet through a. central angle of 19 01 °28'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing westerly along said 20 2,837.00 foot radius curve 14.82 feet through a central angle of 00°17'58"; thence North 21 39° 12'38" East 32.30 feet; thence North 51 °44'48" West 248.65 feet to a point on the 22 northerlyline of said Parcel 3; thence South 74°26'30" East 64.80 feet along said 23 northerly line to a point thereon; thence South 5,1°44'48" East 206.79 feet; thence South 24 39° 12'38" West 25,00 feet; thence, North 51 °44'48" West 7.50 feet; thence South 25 39° 12'38" West 21.53 feet to the True Point of Beginning,. 26 27 Containing 6,181 square feet. 28 29 See Exhibit `F2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 30 31 P:UPTG010501lSURVEYILEQALS122275_APN 117-270-005 and 013 '115-060-013 and 0151Legaist22275-6-PUE.dea Page i of 1019/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 33 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate- 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 I Prepared under the direction of 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260' P:UPTGO10501%URYEY1l.EGALS122275 APA( —117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 0151L.egnIA22275.6-PLIEdocx Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 34 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22.275-6 PUE PEARL .STREET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 1 15-060-01.3: &, 015 17-270-007 117.270-006 360. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDEFREEWAY LEGEND .POB indicates Point of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of. Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing ( a Title to Stote Jill( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances end stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground. distances. Alf distonces are in feet unless otherwise noted. 5- 060- 0' ROUTE 91 RIVERS/DE FREEWAY: C!!; STATIONING 22275-6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMF_NT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PS MAS 3 rt.,. ton (Intro 6rive Ste. 2,10 Sra,la nna Cat:iornio 92707 (71 0751. I315^eee3 (roMI. DATE:06-15-12 REV.:2i 10-09-12 EA: OF54d: FA*:: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS V RIV 91 6.9 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 35 EXHIB T F2 PARCEL# 22275-6 TITLE PUE GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP': AREA 6,181 SO. FT. APN -�S7goz6, CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00°45'34" 5779.66' 76.62' C2 01 °28'52'. 2837.00' 73.33' C3 00°17'S8" 2837.00' 14.82' I. 146.46, of bb 0 s o s PROPOSED R a., 000 .'C/ �=16° 40'20" R.200 �- EXISTING R/W .41.. c,7. N 1.11,1 .—° cr. 0 eta RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 S13°11'22"W R2 509°O59'54HE R3 S08° 31 02"E R4 508° 1 3'04"E T. & ,5402°39'10" R*5779.68' L, S/ ° . 7 L 3 vF A 2 9' C1 LINE,DATA BEARING DISTANCE Lt N39°12'38"E 32.30' L2 539° 12'38"W 25.00' L3 N51°44'48`'W 7.50' L4 539°12'38"W 21.53' R. R [V77°g4,1 144i8_,2 W FOR.. LOT, 12-A ASscssOR'S MAP Poe N0., 31 AMS ! 142-43 PCL., 4 c E1E10. NO, 2006- • 056569 I 0, 950.pt3 .00' J, N78°58,24" 0 131.00' - do S41 ° 19'57" 0 15.92' P0B 7POB (R) LEGEND Indicates Point Of Beginning indicates True Point Of Beginning indicates Radial Bearing' Title to State 1 1) 1 ( Access Prohibited t.r 91 RivE.R51 T 8 9,51 t RIVC/�-RSjAT 0 2 s\~ FRE FRE 9 I AY G' Y NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 2 , 7- PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT FEET 0 40 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nut ion Centre Drive Ste, 7°° Santo en*. Celifornip St {7141151-7373r(7e•IS45-88U Wax) DATE:06-15-2012 REV.: 2; 10-,09-12 EA: OF 540 F A#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS a R1 V 91 e 6:9 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 36 PSO LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-7 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document , No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point > on the westerly, line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915 in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 18.22 feet through a central angle of 05°03' 1 T' to the True Point of Beghming, thence North 81 °26'22" West 28.54 feet to a point on said general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears. South 69°22'14" West; thence northerly along said curve and said general southerly line 12.54 feet through a central angle of 28°44'54" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 21.31 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve 27 concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point' a radial line bears 28 South 59°49'01" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 15.89 29 feet through a central angle of 04°24'31" to the True Point of Beginning. 30 31 Containing 304 square feet. Pa2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275 APN_117-270-0071Legabl22275-7-TCE.docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 37 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ee Exhibit `G2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. he distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate ystem of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 'd distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described-- The mean . mbination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. . Tian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG0105011SURYEMEGALS122275_APN_l 17-270-0071Legals122275-7-TCE.docx Page 2 of.2 10117/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 38 PARCEL*' TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-7 L I 12045ej) LI SHEET 2 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 304 SO. FT. DOC N0. 2006-0565691 O.R. PCL. 2.1 PCL. "1 11 T-2T0-006jl R. g 11 b3/b6 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE LEGEND h PO8 indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing Title to State j i l l 1 Access Prohibited FREEWAY ) 117-270-007 11S-060-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide . by 0.99997476 to obtain ground, distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: P O M Q S 1 Kution Cenire Drive, St.. 200 Sonto An0 COlifeenfO 92707 t 7rxi751.43731t7tA150.46e3 (F04 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17.12 EA: 0F540 FAO: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 1 TOTAL. SHEETS 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 39 PARCEL 'TITLE 22275-7 TCE- Q=89051'�4H 25,ao, L�3g.2?' ,r GRANTOR AIR E A PEARL:::: STREET PROP 304S0.F.T. LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 S81 ° 26'22" E 21 .31 ' LEGEND P08 indicotes Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates true Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing::.;:: . Titie to State j i 1 I j Access Prohibited APN' . 117 270-007 CURVE DATA RADIUS 'I DELTA LENGTH Cl 25.00' 28°44'54" ! 2.54''; C2 206.5.3' 04°24'31" 15.89' POL. LOT 3; BLOCK 73 SOUTH R l VERS 1 DE LAND AND WATER COMPANY NIB 9✓6 NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances ,and stotioning ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOM 3 Ho ton [emirs Orive Ste, 200 Santa ♦no, Cg9liforn:o 112707 -- 171+175f-7)7347,05+.5-$887 If orl DATE:06-15-12 REV,: 10-17-12.. EA:OF540 FA*:' DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET N0.'T4TAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 40 2 3 4 Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-8 5 Temporary Construction. Basement 6 APN l 17-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1 and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: It 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915,,in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 22.91 feet through a central angle of 20 07°26'09" to a point on said easterly line,' said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along said easterly line and said curve 18.72 feet through 22 a central angle of 06°04'33" to a point thereon; thence South 81°26'22" East 83.19 feet to 23 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet; thence 24 easterly along said curve 294.53 feet through a central angle of 05°57'39"; thence North 25 59°49'50 East 46.0E feet; thence South 74°24'15" East 73.17 feet; thence South 26 87°22'34" East 66.13 feet; thence South 02°3726" West 10.98 feet to the beginning of a 27 non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,839.00'feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 00°5728" East; thence easterly along said curve 20.04 feet 29 through a central angle of 00°24' 16" thence North 02°37'26 East 8.02 feet to the 30 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet, to 31 which point a radial line bears South 01 °22'25" East; thence easterly along said curve P.12PTG0105011SURVEMEGALS\22275 APN_117-270-005 and 013 115.060.013 and 0151.egals122275-8-TCE.doct Paga 1 of 10N9V2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 41 7 8 9 10 l 278.36 feet through a central angle of 05°38'01" to a point on the easterly line of said 2 Parcel 1; thence South 41 ° 19'57" East 6.07 feet along said easterly line to a point thereon, 3 said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius 4 of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 07°04'21" East; thence westerly s along said curve 20.99 feet through a central angle of 00°25'26" thence South 41 °21'39" 6 East 8.50 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°44'59" East; thence westerly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence North 81°26122" West 68.83 feet to the True Point of Beginning. it Containing 11,819 square feet. 12 13 14 15 See Exhibit `112' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 16 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 17 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean t8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 19 20 I Prepared under the direction of 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. BuIlock, PLS'5260 P:t2PTG0105011SURYEYILEGALS122275,APN_117-270.005 and 013_115-060-013 and 0151i egalsl22275-8-TCE.doex Page 2 of 2 100/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 42 EXHIBIT PARCEL'# 117-27©-00 ROUTE 91 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring ( ) Title to State 1 : l i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 115-060-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C!L STATIONING 22275-8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 100 zC)a 400 ci00 PREPARED BY: SOMAS 3 Huth+ Centro orir. SIM, 700 Sonia ►no <afiforn.o 07707 t7141731-7373i(7s4,545-606;-(tax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA:OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R1V 91 6.9 1 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 43 w PARCEL# 22275 8 PEARL PROPOSED R/W S45°24'51'1W(R) TITLE TCE EXHIBIT H2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. P09.. L.OT 3; 191.00K 73 SOUTHRIVERSIDE LANE] ANb WA7Eit COMPANY MB ; 9/6 537658'42"W(R) "1 0 � �� I -- 0=05 57 39 R=283100': L=294 53'; 4,=15 18 37 R•=2843.00'` 17=759 69' AREA 11819 S4.F:T. DOD. NO 2006 056569 I 0,13,, APN' POR. SED71014 30 I.39 • R 6Wi FtAt4cHo E..L'' SOBRANTE MB 1/8 POL . I Doc. ND. 2006- D56569 } 0 . R CURVE DATA DELTA' RADIUS LENGTH C1 07°26109" I76.53' 22.91' C2 06°04'33" . 176.53' 18.72' LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning ; TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES',' Coordinates and bearings Ore on CGS 1983(2007.00i Zone 6. DistanCes Ond. stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore .in feet unless otherwise noted. ROUTE 91 L INE DATA SEARING DISTANCE' L1 L2 581 °26'22“E' N81°26'22HW : 83.19' 68.83' 360 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 22 7 - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0. 25 50 w A 100 I50 --, PREPARE© BY: PSOMAS 3 Nuton Centro Drive St.. 79a Santo Ana, California 47707 (714)751-7373/010345.8863 (fa.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA:OF540 FAe: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET Pal SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 44 EXIIIBIT PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT, 117-270-005> & 013 PCL. 1 PICK. NO. 2006- POR. SECTION 30 0565691 CJ.ft. RANCHO RADIAL DATA EL SOBRANTE BEARING MB L'/a _ R.S. 63/66 '-- -._ -----.,. R1 R2 R3 S00°57'28"E_ S01°21`44"E S01 ° 22'25"E 1 N59°49'50"E --- _ 4 6.06 . "- -- -- .. _. _ -..- -- S02°35. 9"W ( j -` ®_ S711°24,i5° LQ R3 ©=05 57 39 ,----.....D 17, yE S87 22'34"E 1 C4 - - 7 66�.1 R / � . 9 9'� 222175.=.8 L3 Ilk L tir 2941.53' ! 759- cv A=15° 18'37" R-2843.00' '`' ��fk i- I— _ R1 4�2 w W UJ PROPOSED R/W C3 0 Itel w vWi L=581.97' ------ `'LN81 °40'38"W 123.1 5' EXISTING ,R/W LINE DATA CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH_ L3 L4 S02°37'26"W NO2° 37'26"E 10.98' 8.02' C3 C4 00°24'16" 05° 38'01 " "2839.00' 2831.00-' 20.04' 278.36', dik 40, ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Cil. STATIONING LEGEND P®6 Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (RI Indicotes Radial Bearing 363 2 ( ) Title to State i I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CC5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 % 5 -- TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMIENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: SOMAS HW ton Cash! 41r r, ' ,,,.i7 '-7$7311,1.15e5 ESlS Va.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV ., 91 6.9 3 -. 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 45 PARCEL# 22275-8 TITLE TCE GRANTOR PEARL ',STREET ::PROP. AREA 11819:SO.FT. APN SEE SHEET 3 POI?. SECT' ON:.20 T. dS. >' R.6W. 11 ANC; I-10 EL 80ERANTE N38 l /8 ...::. PO! . 1 DOC. N0 2006-• 0565691 O . fi, fi' S. 63/66 so - Sty PCL. 3 r .� DOC. NO. 2006-',. 0$6569 I O. R.. r 0- '26"E "' o.3g'S6" Mom' ® J� 2831:Ob% 1�=2843.Q0 PROPOSED R/W p :16° 40120" EXISTING R 759'69 POR LOT. ; .:I..2-A: . ,,. ASSESSORS MAP ya. NO. 1— , AM117 I /412- 43 Yam. PCL 4 am. No 4. 2006-� °56569 I t? , R . Sql ° 19,57,.E :�. 6.0 7o04'21':E" so 506° 44'59"E(VI/ L 5$1.g7 R.200 .00 ROUTE 91 365 LEGEND P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited C ) L. R1vERIDE tR R~2 b99` 0 5418 250 (R 31.00• N78��-.� :. °58•24 W FREEwAY. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/1. STATIONING 6 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6.Distances .and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. A11 distances ore, in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 22275 8' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P 5 © A 5 1 H rten Centrt 0rt4t Ste. 700 Sonia Ana, Californlo W707 (7,41)51-7373/014,545.8283.. 0010 DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET' Phi SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RI 91 6.9 4 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 46 �i y PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 (CPN 22275): Pearl Street Properties, LLC 43020 John Warner Road Temecula, CA 92592 John Murphy, Esq. Murphy & Evertz 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 550 Costa Mesa, California 92626 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Courtesy Copy Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7886312.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7934850.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: c� Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission l 7336.02 l00\7934850. l Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336,0210017935050.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EDIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caitrans Parcel No. 22249-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-01490% of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; theme North 08°00'04" East 3.98 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 32.84 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 33.25 feet along said southerly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 65 square feet. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. See Exhibit `AT attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2P7601050I1SURVEYLLEGALS122249 APN_117-070A291Lep11129249-1-Pee.doc 7f12l2012 Pale I oil EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 Ps OMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1:_ge4e44 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17- /2 P:\2PTG0105011SURV EYILEGALS122249_APN_ 117-070.0291Lega1sL22249-1-Fea.doc M 712012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL** TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-1 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 65 SO.FT. 117-070-029 `\� i 117-070-027 c N r � oro I - 50" i I } 1 k 1--- i I 0 ' 1 �3" 2 LLJ k i--- ! . 1 9 117- 0 70- 028 � ; Cr, O � o- 2 ? ,0' rj ��G�L 586°4210"E 281.76" I! I PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- I 0149096 O.R. �� r 3 1 z t .—. 1 Q i k ! - ! v.o i �� # 0 z 2 2n2�40 ' � i i i u i i� 1� 588° 46"39'�'� _ ---��� SEE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State Access Prohibited .1.11_1_1 NOTES 22249-1 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION - PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 kn,1 ton tent,. n.:..e Ste. 700 seora Ana, to.=tornia ;2707 17t+1751-7373.'014)545-8893 !roam DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAQ: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET Pig SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL** TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-1 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 65 SOS T. 117-070-029 ..1 n• to 0 Er.DOC.*2006- ti Cr; � _ ' e— W IT O p O .�a..� O Z ri 1+Y PARCEL "A" 0149096 O.R. I LS- 1 �� S ? , %, v 001. S84°20`56"E 32. 4' 2 1 M I ►� O t .- ,I,TIilitillill P06 � 33.25 °Ab'39"w ssa 284•40+ RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 2,224 9 - ROUTE 97 LEGEND POB Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ( ) NOTES I FEET 0 22249-1 FEE ACQUISITION Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1961(2007.00) zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 30 i�i. 5 10 20 PREPARED BY: P S O M A 1 ikaten Canr,e Driv® Ste. 200 Soma Aro CAriffornia S2707 '7,,05t • r3T]'i.ta3545-Bdi3 {roxi DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT r COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS a 8 R I V ._ 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `BP LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 CaBanns Parcel No. 22249-2 s r Fee Acquisition 6 APN 117-070-029 7 _ 8 9 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the to land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as it Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 12 13 s 14 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 13.93 is feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 53°07'31" East 16 16.51 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 46.41 feet to a point on the easterly line of said 17 land; thence South 08°03'13" West 55.78 feet along said easterly line to the Point of 18 Beginning. 19 20 21 22 23 24 See Exhibit 4152' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 25 26 27 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 28 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 29 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 30 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 31 Containing 125 square feet. PA2Ph3010501\SURVEVNLEGALS122249_APN_117-070-029U.optet22249-2-Fee.doc 7/12/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 2 3 4 5 PS CAMAS Prepared under the direction of 4ffiefi 6 f Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 8 9 10 11 12 y 13 14 15 16 17 0 18 19 9 Q 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 7 /2• f2 Date P:12PTG010501151iRVEV1EEGA1S\22249 APN_117-070-029U.egals\22249-2-Fee.doc 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-2 FEE HALF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 125 SOFT. 117-070-029 117-070-027 �F _ 1. 1 =c O rl 1 ,( P Nr es I I I I 50 I 4 I ( I l Li i I I CC t '2,117-070-028 I � i - __.. f r 9-1 �- ? ' ° ' XitCl -' ? / SW42'10"E 281.76' I; / I PARCEL "A" / DOG.#2006— i l 0149096 O.R. I t I Z ' f' \ `E I \ I I I „I "' = �— 1 a;© I i °�/ I -o 1(224 vy o— o — co z— ?O ' , i / i / POB I t t t t i s r f t► t l S88° 46'39 ,,� 284 ,40' SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State t t r t i Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-2 Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS v983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACOLIIS1TION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. i> ,imemsemoma FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hui ton centre D+-lee, Ste. 200 7707 (714i 5! to n�)731014�gJ5ABM (ro.3 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAst: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RI V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-2 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 125 SO.FT. 117-070-029 1 II7-070-028 1 50' I i '10 "E 281.76' ci I -- 586°42 1 l ! PARCEL "A" 1 DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. I :. rP Q ��°�� 3 ./3' I,�, 0 � l� �Ap , �� r—�� o 1 z4 i i i 1— 14.1 a; ct ti 0 v) j , i M z I MO � I I in 0 1 22-241 g2, N53°0 '31 "E 16151' 1' I ` Pos 13.93' "284.404 See 46'39 " r LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY PO8 Point of Beginning { } Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I ummilmaimumm FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Orire-Ste. ZOO Santo Mo C017forni0 7i1107 014)151-737)/t714l54s•9ee3 (Feel _ DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAu: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `CV LEGAL DESCRIPTION CaBrans Par}el No. 22;494 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 3.98 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the Tree Point of Beginning; thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 46.45 feet; thence South 01 °01' 15" East 4.30 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 14.45 feet along said southerly lime to a point thereon; thence North 84°20'56" West 32.84 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 269 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. (around distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the copses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PN30105011SURVEY1iEOA[S‘22249 APN_It7-070-029tep1s‘22249-3-PE.doc 7/12/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 PS OMAS 2 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 I 14 15 16 17 y 18 19 20 f; 21 t 22 ti 23 24 t. 25 1 26 27 28 r 29 30 i 31 Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7-a- /2 Date PA2PTG0105011SURVCMEGALS122249 APN_117-070-029ULegals122249-3-PE.doc 7,12I2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22249-3 PE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 269 SOFT. 117-070-029 . \` 117-070-027 1 I t1~ al c) r~ E 0Lu Of 1 1 1 P N" 1 ( 1 7 r r r,) '� l�+ 50' ! f I Lu 1~ I I .��� J 117w070-028 ( U j .-. w Q_ 0— o 0._ 0 �y' ' rt� �\i At 586°42'10"E 2$1.76i _ PARCEL "A" I I DOC.#2006— 1 0149096 O.R. 1 r 3 ` k z 1 j �, I Z "' I M: - j .72 �� j 0 0 i ` 2 TPOB _4' I i 1 1 1 1 ?�;2224 a4 _ 2 .40' _„ti W 1T '�� S8g° 46 39 -- _-'�--..., 5EE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE _91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning Poe Point of Beginning C } Title to State I i 1 t Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-e3 Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ( pEriaYslenome FEET 0 25 SO 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 14010. Celp+re Dr.w Ste. 100 (71:r,n3i71)ti1jS154ee9] MOO DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAte: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 EXHIBIT C2 FARCE Lit TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-3 PE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 269 SOFT. 117-070-029 ..1 Lu1 r ti . r- ,— 9-1y •Q 5.O 0 j 0149096 PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- ,O.R. 46 45` ,;. 2'.$4 t i' 1 1! #�1�1 - 1 23. 0 ' S A� ti� `� ` �) i - S01°01'15"E M Q 1N. — 4�: S84°20'56"E 1 1 { t1 �tli''I _ / O Z ", j----^- 5, T POB N84°20`56' L1 411! 1" i t i t t 1 l 1 I l l 1 H f i l 3.98' P06 ROUTE 284.40. S88° 46`39' 4 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND 7P08 POB True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ( ) t 1 1 1 1 NOTES 22249-3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT "` Coordinates dnd beorings ore on CCS 1993(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 30 5 10 20 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Dr;ve Ste. 200 421.0251-73T3/(71�n15 12707 BH33 (fat) DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET Phi SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `D1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. p249-4 Temporary Construction Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly comer of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 9.99 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 45.50 feet; thence South 01°01'15" East 6.04 feet; thence North 84°20'56" West 46.45 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 276 square feet. gee Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. (around distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:UPTG0105011SURVEYV,60ALS122249 APN 117470-0291Lega16222494-T'CEdoe 7/12/2012 Paul of EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 PSOMAS 2 `; Prepared under the direction of 3 6 x Brian E. Bullock, PL5 5260 7 8!. 9 10 11 12 g 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 i 7 /2- /2 Date P:t2PTG010501 \SUAYEMEGALS\22249_APN_ 117-070-029VLegaisr22249-4-TCE_doc 7/ 12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-4 TCE HALF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 276 SO.FT. 117--070-029 ` I 117-070-027 1 I 1_ � [r ,' ® 1 o 1 1 r 7(4 ° C,i 1 1 1 1 -� i I �35 50' I I i i i , i w i c r � 10 r 117-070-028 1 01 W ` 0- a 0- V . ti‘ ' ,�eGG�L 1 S86° 42'10"E 28136' , 1 PARCEL "A" 1 DOC.#2006- 1 j 0149096 O.R. �! r� !1� 3 1 i Z I •cI l in 1 QM 7r8 m� i 0 I co 0 `� (222:49 4 P � 4 CI ' z TPOB _ ..: t} l 588o 48 .3g�+W 284.4 2 �- -- �--,,,, SEE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning PO8 Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 < < l I Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-4 Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I immili4 -11111111111111111111111 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nuf tow Centre Drive Sic. 200 Sonia Ana, COlif Ornia 92702 oi4P51-7373.171a1545-an (ioxi DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 16 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-4 TCE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 276 SO.FT.y 117-070-029 1 i �� o I rn N PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. 1 r)� r` Y 4 ,V41 , N�G51� 10 3 0 1 N. 0 0 o O 0 - pit' 584°20'56"E 45.50' 6.01' _ � TPOB 6.04' _. — -- tV84°20`56"yy �46.45� l t t 1 1 t Lt l l t I l t 1 1 1 1 1) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 t l 1 1 1 1 1 o 1 l i l l l 1 i 9.99' -.-- S88°46'39„W 284.40' POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State lit 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-4 Coordinates and bearings are an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 5 10 20 30 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nuttoo Centre Or,ve, 3,e, ?co 5.onlo na, Coit orrpty 9,707 ircx 17141 1- CO/./O415 -886 1 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF544 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 �/ R) Y 91 [ A v.4 2 ^] 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `El' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22249-5 Temoorary Construction Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March I, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°4639" West 13.93 feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning, thence South 88°4639" West 14.21 feet continuing along said southerly line to a point thereon; thence North 03°04'21" East 28.93 feet; thence South 86°28'44" East 24.04 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 63.02 feet to a point on the northerly line of said land; thence South 86°42'10" East 3.53 feet along said northerly line to the northeasterly corner of said land; thence South 08°03'13" West 33.65 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 10°35'59" West 46.41 feet; thence South 53°07'31" West 16.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 994 square feet See Exhibit 1E2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PTG010501%.S11RVEVVFAALSr22249 APN_I17-070.02911.epls122249-5-TCE.d°c 7/12/2012 Pap 1a2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 PSOMAS 6 7 8! 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 f 21 22 23 24 25 '! i 26 ! 27 28 29 30 31 Preaared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PIS 5260 Date r2- a P:12PTGRIRSOILSURVEYI4EGALS122249 APN 117.070-0291Legals\22249-5-TCE.doe 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL* TITLE . GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-5 TCE NAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 994 SOFT. 117-070-029 .,�� i 717-070-027 (.4 v v 0- in Ca��_2�o { 1 I r'\ I f (I 50' I I w I I w CC y 0 117-070-028 I V) . W Z ? . ° ' �fko� \ / 586° 42' i 0"E 281 .76' // ! PARCEL "A" / DClC.#2006— 0149096 O.R. 1 t ..... I i Q 1 1 i .— I I QM I a;° i i aoa 0 . o — o _ z (22249 : 1, 3 .�.� j /! I i POB �' r TPOB 284 _ _ .a0' 39„w 17171-1I1 -1 7- sSa° 46 SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning C ) Title to State 1 (1 t Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-5 Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Ho. tenire OrtCal rSvc Sit. 200 (7i.15- 73t3R3t4)5454B 63 (f0.1 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET Pm SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 f1 RIV 91 c 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-5 .. TCE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 994 SO.FT. 117-070-029 1 �' � 2 117-070-028 50 4 7r4° l 0"E 281 .76'_.----- 3.53' (.0 ( ---- S86°42'i ___ 1 N a PARCEL "A" � . DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. nCr in ci [^ 3 O,Iv 0 586°2$'44" '"24.04' M o , �o ; 2h � M 1— in lu i a; I—I i o 1 a , o V) 1 w (22249-5) �, j .- N re,' v 6� o0•1N °0,`h\ o ��AD z 4 1 .43 . (0' I P� P06 1 A.21 588046'39i11 284.40 TP0131 13.93' LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State i Li i i Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-5 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00i Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 t+utton Centre °rive. Ste. 200 {71•j75i 7373i(71.15i5.3 83 EraK) DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET Plot SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS 0 8 R I V n 7 1 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 21 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-070-029 (CPN 22249): HAGF Enterprises, L.P. 29484 Live Oak Canyon Road Redlands, CA 92373 Mark Sabbah Sabbah and MacKoul 116 North Vineyard Avenue Ontario, CA 91764 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Courtesy Copy Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7934850.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7910782.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGE LLP ,(1. By: al ' Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7910782.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7935081. I EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `AV LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca'trans Parcel No. 22111-1 Fee Acquisition APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 9; thence North 80°32'34" West 370.35 feet along the southerly line thereof to the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 9; said corner being the point of cusp with a curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 09°27'26" West; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Parcel 9 and said curve 82.05 feet through a central angle of 08°23'42" to a point thereon; thence South 80°32'34" East 33.25 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,990.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°30'39" West; thence easterly along said curve 174.22 feet through a central angle of 03°20' 19' ; thence South 86°49'39" East 82.22 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Parcel 9; thence South 09°28'52" West 29.02 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 4,478 square feet. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. PA2PTG0105011.SURVEYSLEGALS\22111_APN_102-020-044V.egalst22111-I_fee.doe Page 1 of 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PSOMAS 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Prepared under the direction of Yei,e/Lei /o - /0-/ Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS12211 l wAPN 102-020-044lLegals\2211l-1_Fee Joe PAge 2 of 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-1 FEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 4,478 SOFT, 102-020-044 s A i O, i. /` A 102-020-049 `fv' 0K/ O. T° �, P.M., 158/92-9b PARCEL 3 O s,+A / �`��- �., 9\'-' 4p�/ �� _ o 0=41 ° 24 `46" va R=559.99' `' -"--L=404.74' to v- et N o o co _..1 w t; Z �2`+ .-- -----" to PROP SE R!W -`cm P,M, 15a/92--96 to _ A \ -- -- 1 -- -~ a, -� ��2, N80° 32'3411W --_' -- ----__ 370.35' � --�'' POB ------- --- EXISTING R/W SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C!L STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing I ( ) Title to State 8 9 1 } 1 } Access Prohibited 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 1 FEE ACQUISITION distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. i pm....1 immommummomm FEET 0 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: R S O M A S 3 Hutton Centre Criva Ste. 200 Sony® Ara, C-rtifprni0 132707 (7t4}4tl-805317t4}545-0893 (Fox} DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 71 3.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-1 FEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 4,478 SO.FT, 102-020-044 a WARDLOW ^RpAQ_' P,Q.- 0 �,�'t. L1=08°23"42" \ a �� �cco R=559.99' �o L=82.05' N80°32'34"W 370.35' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY EX STING RIW BELOW LEFT w w ABOVE RIGHT \6.-03° 20' 19" R=2990.00 i — —L=174. 2' P, J, 15'8./92-96 PARCEL 9 PROPOSED R/w S86° 49'39"E N80°32'34"W 370.35' LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State till Access Prohibited 14 0.0 1 '---- Poe 102-020-045 ca LL1 L") a-. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on GCS 1983(2007,00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22111-1 FEE ACOU15fTION I r� ram■■moM FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PS a M A 5 3 Hutton Centro Drive, Ste. 200 Sonio Ano, California 02707 {7141481-8053/(7141545-8883 Vo.) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R1V 91 3.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS 4MA5 EXHIBIT `131' .LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22111-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside Cotmty, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of. said Parcel 9; thence North 09°28'52" East 29.02 feet along the easterly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 86°49'39" West 82.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,990.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 174.22 feet through a central angle of 03°20'19'; thence North 80°32'34" West 33.25 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 9, said point being the beginning of non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 01 °03'45" West; thence easterly along said northerly line and said curve 34.24 feet through a central angle of 03°30'12" to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,984.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06'29'47" West; thence easterly along said curve 173.11 feet through a central angle of 03°19'26"; thence South 86°49'39" East 82.88 feet to a point on said easterly line; thence South 09°28'52" West 6.04 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,632 square feet. See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. P:12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122111_APN_102-020-0441Legals!22111-2_PE.doe Page 1 of 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 . 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS O MAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983,.Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of ZZAdeirr.-4 M-/Q-tz Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date P:12PTG010501`SURVEYILEGALS122111_APN_102.020-044U.egals122111-2_PL'•.doc Page 2 (42 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-2 ESMT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,632 SO.FT. 102-020-044 r{ / O. /' / * 102-020-049 s� r\V' O , "° V 'I / � i * ' p; P.M, 153/92�-96 / Q''' '/ ' PARCEL 3 \1P `� G] .� ,� / . „V P -'"-- L.=41 °24'46' Q R=559.99' ----L-404.741 a- O N � o 1 0 0.1 nd I 1r ``•*\\ '` - P.M, Ise/ 1.2-96 £in -- a� ti� ��� �.....— \ -` — !� A 1 C P L 9 cv PROPOSED R/W _ ' 1 r� 1-- o (cP - - -" F,, .r - V) 1, -- N80°32'34" W 370.35' f _ -_ � - r r --- POB EXISTING R/W SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C/i- STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning IR) Indicates Radial Bearing I I ( ) Title to State (((l Access Prohibited 8 9 180 NOTES Coordinotes and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ( �� omm■mmum1uisi FEET 0 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive. Ste. 200 Santa 14j46iAna, Q057/ California714 (7SAS--B2B) (Fox) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V (] 91 3.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-2 ESMT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,632 SO.FT. 102-020-044 `-502°26'28"E(R) °'�� I- ROAD INARDL°W - _ - (R=559.991 ------•---- - __-0=03°30"12" 506°29'47"W(R) R=559.99 (R=2984.00') L-34.24' A=03°n'26" R 2984 00' L 173 1 1 _.. - -_ =03o 20`19" R-2990.00 L=174.2 1.1 J O J W CD Ili Qft N80° 32'34"W 501°03'45'1P 33.25' 506°30'39 W(R)EXISTING R!W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY _ CC W > ��Oy� w '0 0) �o �.`�, ��d F , Ill J 5-3/ )2 1v 440 IN.',)o h rar"l PARCEL } �O CV 0c.._...... l/1 `pp=p3° 19`26 ° 4939E 82 88 ` R=2984.00 L= i 73 1 1 r 586 _-. ,� _��- '.. .� -�N86° 49"39"W� a2.22 ` iv �P C3 6.04' T POB i atil Q N co —1 i� < A=03"20 19 PROPOSED RIM o' W La! R=2990.001 L=1 74.22' � ' fV . POB LEGEND P0B (ndicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning IR) Indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( }Title to State ) ) l l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet."`mmeam4 unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste, 200 Sang Ana, Coliforn:o 92707 0141481-8053!(7143543-8883 ,Fox) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.:10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FA1t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 3.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `CP LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22111-3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map fled in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 9; thence North 09°28'52" East 35.06 feet along the easterly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 86°49'39" West 82.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,984.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 173.11 feet through a central angle of 03° 19'26" to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 9, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 02°26'28" East; thence easterly along said northerly line and said curve 116.13 feet through a central angle of 11 °52'54"; thence South 15° 11'56" East 26.13 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,981.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 04°09'24" West; thence easterly along said curve 51.21 feet through a central angle of 00°59'04'; thence South 86°49'39" East 83.21 feet to a point on said easterly line; thence South 09°28'52" West 3.02 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,907 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. P:12PTC0105011SURVEYTEGALS122111_APN_102-020-044lLegals\22111-3 TCE.doc Page l of l 0/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS The distances described herein arc grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 /d-/D-IZ Date PA2PTG010501LSURVEIALEGALS122111_APN_102-020-044U..egals122111-3 TCE.doc Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,907 SOFT. 102-020-044 ,� / o, r /' v moo. 102-020-049 Qr3Y , 'r0 \ s ..-v P,M, 158/ 92-96 0�, ` P; ()Vf f- ....!- PrrDEL ��(' 546.: . 0 . a=41 °24'40'� � R=559.99' -------`" - - --L = 4 04.7 4 ' ilw v 0 i o 1 o CO -a Ll Lt- JV� - - -- - crb o'L PROPOSE R /W ' OP s;-_� r ►■I�rrrl.n>rrr�+rwllrr• *>Ill�r�,lw► o r�_ _ � , . 0 � - " _ . ---- 1- `, N80 32'34 W 370.35' -�'}jJ'��pp 1 EXISTING RAN SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE LEGEND C/L STATIONING PO8 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (RI Indicates Radial Bearing I 1 1 ( ) Title to State 8 9 11 + I Access Prohibited 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 isi imimima FEET 0 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Orive, Ste. 200 d7t4)4(0 805347114)544-8883 (Fax) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 0 8 R I V 91 3.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 12 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,907 SO.FT. 102-020-044 51 5° 1 1 '56"E "� 26.1 3' S02°26'28"E(R) _ -- - \ (R 559.99') 06•13 i-- ( L.L. __- - M 506 29 47 W(R) �9, 1-" „.AR} (R=2984.00') 6Q„ R-- •• 5�q ` ° °'1`� �1� WARDLOW ROAD 52 AA=03° 19'26" R=2984.00' L=1 73.11'-- -am-, - - eftemm w O LLJ w , ima( ( EXISTING R/W cn ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Ro �'° 1 R„,014 PAL J 58/92- 96 � W P PARCEL 9 tr 504°09'24"W R c�vo — o � o) Q o co i LL1 .o � I— 2 CC u.iN86' - ) v O 6.=00° 59'04" R=2981 .00' S86° 49'39'E 83.21 ' 3.02' L=51 .21' 49'39"W 82.88' TPOB � N 4 "A tl. m a ____ , p=03° 19' 6" � R=2984.00 L=173.11 0 PROPOSED R /W ,• W LA to - P08 LEGEND ROUTE 91 POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicotes Radial Bearing RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( }Title to State ) ) ) ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1.1. 1.- 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I— " FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 ttutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 2707 (7t1)491n E053471415498853(Fox) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FAA: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 3.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 13 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044(CPNS 2211): Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona ATTN: Dean R. Derleth, City Attorney Corona City Hall 400 South Vicentia Avenue Corona, CA 92882 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Margaret I. Barnes 17336.02100\7910782.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7934853.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: April 26, 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: \i-\Le/ it Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7934853.1 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Lot 2 of Tract No. 7432-1, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by Map on file in Book 86, Page(s) 7 and 8 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. APN:118-160-021-4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 1 Asevrtativ i a «ar+aar a. VI MI 4771 r f1MAaM TRACT 7132 • / ij+`tAe LA(• Ai USA At IRS r • 4liilYllA/ w rrww AINWP;, c.+ u�x+r r Jlalfd /1740 MAUI:"NO N.WirfAVI 71tY�Nr+* Q110I1R45GIiE/ PARCEL 1 P M. 19 /36 a*a a.• ar A. owiMMM.4 ' �•rw.rr / sir .tiMMr" aat a..ANY rrOY SOUTH R1VERS10E LAND BLOC K MN� Ts Mr-.Mrar'•' •». arsr /OMB /JAM► 4 LOT 9 I( Air �. *1 M rMY & WATER CO. 67 a M`alr LOT ;2 v *VAOT ! Ir ! 0100,0 00054411Mir AWYMAI KAMY+ rrr AMP r NW parr I SIMKO swMap IIa01urr � i r�rww . ��w *NI 1400 �rrr IP arei ' fitarS wig.MMaw WarierY - araMr"ilrev • amansit •rMal MOW /NO r.nM rr anw�► /awMrwMMM► wu .MMMr rr AMdMrM •Moor aMrl r If NC mall : EiNallor ` PARCEL 1 t • R 5. 34 l 100 . AA A'S Not AM Agarfore i a larr aw arrarov moot egerararK.w Jtarwl J Is AYM Air401 k ITHE ACRE TRN wi r.w � �A rYJ/•T MAP /5 FOA AsszsmitiIr Pt/0moms oae e 39Vel `tl 1181HX3 POR. C/TY OF CORONA P•.K 161/3/- 32 Parcel Map No.23869 P.N. /17/2 -23 Rorer/Mop + /.9449 P• 4i 38/35 1148 9✓6,899.kuth Riverside Led and Pk1 r Ca A�Q BS/7-8 Pact Na T43?-/ P. M. �e"� " 209'3 PM 80/ RM.186/48-49 23870 d1B84/6l,62 Tract NO.7/Q9 8-56 IR.A.004103 '/8 /f,,` +Arf tiff 040 /r +Alt J. JJ ,V4J, Jr A,T/ 44.01 4r Jx J/;fr tJ. Y J$4+44 44 ♦} t/ u4t J/It Jt 44 44. 10 V 40•JD r/ r/IVO, c " M44 4A40 4.04 AAA!, *Cr 40. Js J4+t rJ-44 44 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 118-160-021 (CPN 22192): Kenneth James Tressen 2805 Mount Niguel Circle Corona, CA 92882 Sharon Ann Tressen 2805 Mount Niguel Circle Corona, CA 92882 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Record Owner Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7934853.1 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER OF CONTINUED HEARING Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7886310.1 e California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: April 26, 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: ,aW� Y 11 ,n 1�� Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7886310.1 File No: 12002670 EXHIBIT "A" All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 3 of Trinidad Yorba Tract, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 2 p 22 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to W.I. Hollingsworth by deed from the State of California, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995 of Official Records; thence along the Easterly boundary of said parcel North 9° 25' 50" East 237.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through an angle of 109° 46' 50" a distance of 47.90 feet to Course "A"; thence along Course "A" North 81° 08' 21" East 355.94 feet to the Easterly terminus of that certain curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 343.00 feet in the Southeasterly line of that portion of land condemned by the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records; said point also being on the Westerly boundary of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Ray N. Woods, et ux, by deed recorded May 12, 1961 as Instrument No. 40636, of Official Records; thence Southwesterly along said curve from a tangent bearing of South 78° 51' 44" West through an angle of 69° 25' 54" a distance of 415.65 feet; thence South 9° 25' 50" West parallel with said Easterly boundary 51.48 feet; thence North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That portion of the North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street which would ordinarily pass with a conveyance of Parcel 1 described above, as vacated by Resolution No. 82-115 of the City Council of the City of Corona, recorded January 28, 1983 as Instrument No. 18074, of Official Records, Riverside County records, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the land described in the Director's Deed to W.I. Hollingsworth, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the tangent portion of the Easterly line of Exhibit A, Page 1 File No: 12002670 said land of Hollingsworth, South 9° 25' 50" West 44.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 13.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" an arch distance of 20.42 feet to the Southerly line of said North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street; thence along said Southerly line South 80° 34' 10" East to the Southerly prolongation of that certain course having a bearing and length of "South 9° 25' 50" West 51.46 feet" in the Southeasterly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the last mentioned prolongation North 9° 25' 50" East 57.00 feet to said Northerly line of the North 57.00 feet of the West Sixth Street; thence along said West Sixth Street North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 102-270-010 Exhibit A, Page 2 ?.`"..1= ASSESSOR'S MAP the t0s AG. 27 R/vERSiDE COO.' C4L/F POR. r s R.7 W. ( PcR. RO LA sredreR4 YOR8.4) ' :I 1 F. I i\--• /1 srArE t.P1.22."."41.N.,• WCST Nwy 0 9 T R 4 .106' , l'ef 2/22 rein/dad rcr2u non' PM. 117/100-101 Rarcei Moo 19J94 1.2?4 / 02-2r 44.1 01. ea JPOr ...II at* • Exhibit A, Page 3 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-270-010 (CPN 22111): Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc. 1805 West 6th Street Corona, CA 92882 Charles S. Krolikowski Newmeyer & Dillion LLP 895 Dove Street, 5th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Courtesy Copy Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7886310.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most. compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7934851.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`1Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER P By: Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7934851.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7935577.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `AI' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22153-1 Fee Acquisition APN 118-040-021 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Grant Deed recorded July 30, 2008 as Document No. 2008- 0417177 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said land; thence South 79°39'03" West 307.31 feet along the general southerly line of said land to a point thereon; said point being the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 166.00 feet; thence westerly along said general southerly line and said curve 123.70 feet through a central angle of 42°41'44" to a point thereon; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 172.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 24°27'44" West; thence easterly along said curve 104.51 feet through a central angle of 34°48'54"; thence North 79°38'49" East 320.35 feet to a point on the easterly line of said land; thence South 16°03'48" East 13.30 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 4,959 square feet. ee Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2P'fG0105011SUR V E Y\LEGALS122I53_APN_ 118-040-0211Legals122153- I-Fee.doc 11/14/2012 Page I oft EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PS OMAS Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122153_APN_11 R-040-02111,egais\22153-1-Fee.doc 11/14/2012 Page 2 of EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA APN 22153-1 FEE 4,959 SO.FT. 118-040-021 118-040-0201 - LOT 49 LOT 50 .� r 18-040-019 ,c0 21'E PDL , 033 N10 a� 1i8,0A0" P 11.4, r 18-040-022 TRACT NO, 10896 o LOT 52 M..a, 96181-05 - LOT 51 m. PCL 2 f c^ et,`') .<2• DOG. NO. 2008- U4 J I 1 / I O.R. CURVE TABLE ? o o o co `4`' C1 = A=42°41144" R=166.00' L=123.70' �'' M. C2 = 6=34°48'54'. R=172.00' L=104.511 s_ oh) RADIAL TABLE AR1=532°20'47.0/ (R=166.00') 13.30' 1351 1,\ q (i) ^; --- 0 �at o OSE© a'w 320.3 v poop “v..% s �ni o 38 A9 N ._ 1A19 n' C 2 ` 03 W 519° 3 �- o 0 'Qp G r 5 "A � 1:5 I QPs ♦� EW A RE � 40 55-56 ,, 2 IN �� r f7�R�ir1-' � 3QSi °'Z r f�JG1` 102 26- S0 6=53°12'121' �� 9� 9 r '' — R-166.00' Qv �- L=154.14' R q�aSi�ION\NG LEGEND $ 9� S� P (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning U1� .) a0 �4,40 V - ( ) Title to State 1 1 t 1 1 Access Prohibited 6 NOTES 2 2153-1 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. �1 $111011111181111Emomm FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hurfon Cenfre Orive S+e. 200 Sonia Ano, Colifornio 92707 t71417Si 7373t(714)5a5-99E3 (Fait DATE: 07-31-2012 REV. 11-14-2012 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ R I V 9 1 4.5 1 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE PS OMAS 1 EXHIBIT 9B1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22153-2 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 118-040-021 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, being a portion of the 9 land described in that certain Grant Deed recorded July 30, 2008 as Document No. 2008- to 0417177 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: tt 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said land; thence North 16°03'48" West 13.30 13 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 79°38'49" West 14 308.63 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 79°38'49" West 11.72 feet to 15 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 172.00 feet; thence 16 westerly along said curve 36.36 feet through a central angle of 12°06'47'; thence North t 7 01 °45'36" East 10.00 feet; to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 18 having a radius of 162.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 01°45'36" West; 19 thence easterly along said curve 34.25 feet through a central angle of 12°06'47"; thence 20 North 79°38'49" East 11.72 feet; thence South 10°21'11" East 10.00 feet to the True 21 Point of Beginning. 22 23 Containing 470 square feet. 24 25 See Exhibit 132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 26 27 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 28 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 29 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 30 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 31 P 12PTG410501 SURVEY\LEGALS122153_APN_118-040-0211Legals122153-2-TCE.doe 1 1/14/2012 Page I or2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS OMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1l 14 Date PA2PTG010501kSURVEYV.EGALS122153_APN_118.040-0211Lega1s122153-2-TCE doc 11/14/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL* TITLE AREA A P N 22153-2 TCE 470 SOFT. 118-040-021 118-040-020 LOT 49 LOT 50 1 �� 118-040-019 1g ,21'� PCL , 3 053 OQo' N1,,° A6 1 $- s�/�, 118-o4o-oz2 -TRACT NO. 10896 0 L J O!' 52 M,$, 76131-8 LOT 51 �- ��) t'i; ti6 .h' DOC. NO. 2008-0411111 O.R. � CURVE TABLE a N in a o Po t �° ''�" C1 = 0=12°06'47" R=172.00' L=36.36' `:' � C2 = 0=12°06'47" R=162.00' L=34.25' 040 LINE TABLE 1 3.30" �v- `4 L1 -- N01°45'36"E(R) 10.00' �/W , v- , qg" E pROpOSE� "t Q3 0 v iiiii 3 _ i '4 / OCio N1 g� - 2 „E ' C =a ° 2� 1 A 1 30S ,65 ? Q8 .� �`.. 1 ��� O�5�q C- 5'—IPA" P � �' ‘p32 � fir-- C 2 Li C 7 0=53° 5'001 p .00 „W S� 9° 3g' 49 �' ' `1 Sig• 3$-A9S�9°3g 03 � w �- 12' � z"� IVER R � 4►'r� �Qi .31 ar�rA �_ Y SI � 02-280. _ !' R=166.00' k - L=1 54.14' 9 9 LEGEND ROUE X. (R) Indicates Radial Bearing TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Paint of Beginning e 1`IE� LpN\ 91 R 51 P 'fOl0 p`( C VR�-�� ( ) Title to State ill 1 t Access Prohibited 6 NOTES 22153-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I ii FEET 0 40 60 160 240 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Dri,e, Ste. 200 Santo Ana, COlifornio 927D7 (71ty75t-7373it7talSaS-8883 (Fox) DATE: 07-30-2012 REV. 11-14-2012 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 ^-R I V 91 1 4.5 - 1 1 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `C1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22153 3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 118-040-021 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Grant Deed recorded July 30, 2008 as Document No. 2008- °417177 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence North 16°03'48" West 13.30 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 79°38'49" West 14.44 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 79°38'49" West 48.83 feet; thence North 10°21'11" West 10.00 feet; thence North 79°38'49" East 48.83 feet; and thence South 10°21'11" East 10.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 488 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG0105011SUR VEYILEGALS122153_APN_I 18-040-0211Legals122153.3-TCE.doe 11/l4/2012 Page I oft EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 l t 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS 4MAS Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PT60105011SUR VEY1LEGALS122153_APN_ 118-040-0211Lega1s122153-3-TCE.doc 11/I4/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA APN 22153-3 TCE 488 SOST. 118-040-021 -- "-- LOT 49 I I8-040-020 LOT 50 9 118-040-019 ,91 ,23''� PGL .13 p33 �10 11$.OA(Y ` 1:34'114, �� ��-9 I18-040-022 TRACT NO, 10896 6'° J LOT 52 M,S. 96/81 `85 ,I` col_ F'GL, � LOT 5 1 0 �: �� , ^c1• DOG. NO, 2JJc3- Jai J I 1 I I D R > A., o�' " N r, o 0 o co ti — o h oh ` =b. E 13.30' �a co a03 N� 9° 3ga39 4$ 400 O \y 0° 2� + 0, W ii, p R /W N1 � 0 '0 g .g, pR5� �9 3St 49yW 450 , ' A.A4, rrr�►* • 5 ° ' 030 8' Ac) rrr S� rrrrr '1 s3 190 �� 5/ o'�q 5 6 , L1O .-7-?`.7D r �i� 5564 W- 8 _032 - r r vr r r G �/� WAY �"„ _, e o_ EXXS3lN 0 1C- 24c �'- A=53° 1 2'12�� Rt\ERS1D 102-2 ;- R-166.00' 9� 9 -- r L=154.14' LEGEND OU�� R Vi t9lpNtN0 (R) Indicates Radial Bearing TPOB True Point of Beginning P08 Point of Beginning a x Ix L1�� g1 CA' S� i (�O �yp�t 1; ik c ) Title to State ( ( I I I Access Prohibited 6 NOTES 2 2 1 5 3 3 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless Otherwise noted. ( imasimmommt FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Orive, Ste, 200 (71Jj751-°i37 iM 415 8883 (Fox) DATE: 07-30-2012 REV. 11-14-2012 EA: OFS40 l:A3t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 w.uw.� R I V w ar9_.... 1 4. 5 1 1 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 118-040-021 (CPN 22153): Nancy A. Nicola 1731 Pomona Road Corona, CA 92880 Warren H. Lampkin 1731 Pomona Road Corona, CA 92880 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Record Owner Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7934851.1 INDIAN WELLS (760) 568-261 1 IRVINE (949) 263-2600 LOS ANGELES (2 1 3) 61 7-8 100 ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, P.O. BOX 1028, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 PHONE: (95 1) 686-1450 I FAx: (95 1) 686-3083 vmv BBKLAW.COM MARGARET L. BARNES (95 I ) 826-8357 MARGARET. BARNES@B BKLAW . COM April 1, 2013 SACRAMENTO (91 6) 325-4000 SAN DIEOO (619) 525-1300 WALNUT CREEK (925) 977-3300 WASHINOTON, DC (202) 785-0600 Jennifer Harmon VIA HAND DELIVERY Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission D rI d -, 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor c, Riverside, California 92501 Re: Original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners of Resolution of Necessity Hearing Scheduled for May 8, 2013 T RIVERSIDE COUNTY RCTC/SR91 Capital Improvements Project ° RANSPORTATION COMMISSION Property Ownership: Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., APN 102-270-010 Property Ownership: Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNS 115-060-013, 117-270-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 Dear Jennifer: Attached is the original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners, with proofs of mailing, of the hearing on the Resolution of Necessity which is scheduled for May 8, 2013. The original Notices were mailed on March 29, 2013. It will be necessary for you to note the proof of mailing of the Notices at the hearing. The remaining documents needed for the hearing (Resolutions of Necessity, Agenda Report, Memorandum from Legal Counsel) have been provided in draft form to Gina Gallagher for her review and revision. She will provide the finalized versions to you priodr to the hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, Ad -A: oti Margaret L. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachment copy: Gina Gallagher, Senior Right of Way Agent (w/copy of Attachments, via e-mail only) 45774.20010\7893300.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the transportation project and other related uses for the SR91 CIP Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "1," attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7886310.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: , 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP B ark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7886310.1 Fite No: 12002670 EXHIBIT "A" All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 3 of Trinidad Yorba Tract, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 2 p 22 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to W.I. Hollingsworth by deed from the State of California, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995 of Official Records; thence along the Easterly boundary of said parcel North 9° 25' 50" East 237.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through an angle of 109° 46' 50" a distance of 47.90 feet to Course "A"; thence along Course "A" North 81° 08' 21" East 355.94 feet to the Easterly terminus of that certain curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 343.00 feet in the Southeasterly line of that portion of land condemned by the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records; said point also being on the Westerly boundary of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Ray N. Woods, et ux, by deed recorded May 12, 1961 as Instrument No. 40636, of Official Records; thence Southwesterly along said curve from a tangent bearing of South 78° 51' 44" West through an angle of 69° 25' 54" a distance of 415.65 feet; thence South 9° 25' 50" West parallel with said Easterly boundary 51.48 feet; thence North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That portion of the North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street which would ordinarily pass with a conveyance of Parcel 1 described above, as vacated by Resolution No. 82-115 of the City Council of the City of Corona, recorded January 28, 1983 as Instrument No. 18074, of Official Records, Riverside County records, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the land described in the Director's Deed to W.I. Hollingsworth, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the tangent portion of the Easterly line of EXHIBIT 1, PAGE 1 File No: 12002670 said land of Hollingsworth, South 9° 25' 50" West 44.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 13.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" an arch distance of 20.42 feet to the Southerly line of said North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street; thence along said Southerly line South 80° 34' 10" East to the Southerly prolongation of that certain course having a bearing and length of "South 9° 25' 50" West 51.46 feet" in the Southeasterly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the last mentioned prolongation North 9° 25' 50" East 57.00 feet to said Northerly line of the North 57.00 feet of the West Sixth Street; thence along said West Sixth Street North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 102-270-010 EXHIBIT 1, PAGE 2 POR. T. 3S. R.714! (POR. RO LA SIERRA YORBA1 TR,, A 406 9-32-/ 102-27 — 30 �- o•r.•�l ais. seen ASSESSOR'S MAP RX /02 PG. 27 RIVERS/DE COLWTY CALIF .,r N Wy 91 s. M,B. 2/22 Trinidad Y rn° Tract I p PM. 1/7//00-/0/ Parcel Map /9394 '�Rf NO.. /377 �. EXHIBIT 1, PAGE 3 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Frances White, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on Friday, March 29, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-270-010: Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc. Record Owner 1805 West 6th Street Corona, CA 92882 Charles S. Krolikowski Courtesy Copy Newmeyer & Dillion LLP 895 Dove Street, 5th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 DATED: March 29, 2013. eieR iJ Frances White 1733 6, 02100\78 86310.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the, Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the transportation project and other related uses for the SR91 CIP Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "1," attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 17336.02100\7886312.1 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, ri Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST B,TST & KRIECrER LLP Bv: r \\1( A. k\AEaster Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7886312.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Access Easement" refers to an non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction site, as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC, shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent of RCTC. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours 1733 6.02100\7888203.1 after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to, reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove, at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limited to sewers, water, electrical systems and communication systems, consisting wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholds, and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in, under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC, will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 17336.02100\7888203.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °40'38" West 19.65 feet continuing along said general southerly line to the beginning of a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 15.87 feet through a central angle of 36°21'56'; thence South 81 °26'22" East 29.38 feet to a point on said westerly line, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 52°17'05" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 130 square feet See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. P:\2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275_APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-1-Fee.docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 PSOMAS 1 2 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 3 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to 4 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 5 6 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 7 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 8 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 9 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 10 11 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 15 16 �. 1O-/7/2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-1-Fee.docx Page 2 of 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 130 S0. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 " 7-270_004 6 A• T •&S.F R.R . 119-3pp-p21 ,• 115-060-016 1` N — — ---- - I 4 PCL , 2 I DOC . NO, 2006- 0565691 OR.. PCL , 1 aeL ____ --- 117-270-0061------ -"1-------,_' .�-S. PCL. 4 --------------------------- �' I N81 40'30"►y r® 63 — ------- /6 6------ ______.r r -. - . r:'� 1-� r r r 212.14 �0 POB - 22,275=1 TPOB 365 I SHEET 2 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING ''Ci. LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5- 1 FEE ACQUISITION distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. ( FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Sonto Ano Coiifernio 92707 (714)751-7373/(7141545-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V (] 7 1 6.9 1 2 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP 130 SO.FT. 117-270-007 POR ., LOT 3; FiLOCIC 73 SOUTH RlV RS1Dr LAND AND UTATr R CONIPANY 30, MB 9/6 i 1-. l) tu Lij S� o° AZ Q, W (,) PCL 2 1 ..,4 w DOC, NO., 2006-0565691 O,R, / .rc Zo l� M , Q. O r- 1 0 "' o� '� , 0° 1 z �, 0 ��,� Oa A=89°51 ,1q„ — _ , _ v` 6' R_ 25,0p' —"; mod,_ _ _ _ _ ,�`Q`1 39. 21 c' , O, 4; 00 1 _ s Sg4o ►_ S87 °�6 ,22 ,'.sue- -- Sh`L Shy 47 �18�W(R `�� -� rg 38 E — _ _ =36 21 'S6" R=25.00' 1g,=6.gb =15,8�. N81 °4038„W 1=206.53' N81 o4p,38„W 1 .. TpoB 2 7 2. 7 q - 14014SED R/W LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ) Title to State I I 1 I t Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 / 5 - 1 FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 tp 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonto Ano, Colifornio 92707 (714)751-7373/P141545-H83 (Fox) DATE:6-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 2 PS OMAS EXHIBIT 131' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-2 5 Fee Acquisition 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28"; thence South 81 °26'22" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41 °20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve 25 165.85 feet through a central angle of 03°20'58"; thence North 02°32'29" East 95.94 feet 26 to a point on the general northerly line of said Parcel 4, said point being the beginning of 27 a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 13°11'22" West; thence easterly along said northerly line the 29 following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 30 00°45'34" and 2) South 77°34'12" East 140.88 feet to the northeasterly corner of said 31 Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 73.97 feet along the general easterly line of said PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275_APN_117-270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-2-FEE.docx 10/9/2012 Page 1 of 3 PSOMAS t Parcel 4 to the southeasterly corner thereof and the beginning of a non -tangent curve 2 concave northwesterly having a radius of 1,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 3 South 18°23'16" East; thence westerly along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4 4 and along said curve 199.21 feet through a central angle of 05 °51' 11 " to the most 5 southerly corner thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; 6 thence South 41 °19'57" East 15.92 feet along said northeasterly line to the most easterly 7 corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78°58'24" 8 West 131.00 feet to the most easterly comer of said Parcel 1, said point being the 9 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to to which point a radial line bears South 08°20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly l l line of said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 581.97 feet 12 through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40'38" West 123.15 feet to the 13 Point of Beginning. 14 15 Containing 51,953 square feet. 16 17 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 18 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 19 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 20 21 See Exhibit 132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on Califomia Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 25 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 27 28 29 30 31 P:12PTG0105011SURVEYkLEGALSk22275_APN_117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015ULegals122275-2-FEE.docx 10/9/2012 Page 2 of 3 PSOMAS 1 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /0 - 09-/Z Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-2-FEE.docx Page 3 of 10/92012 — — — EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-3 & 015 117-270-010-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 ,,7,27p Ooa o � _ SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 f A•T•4s.F• R•R � ,� SHEET 2 ,, 115-060-016 9-300-021 /• er ,(n ;JCL, 2 IQ I DOG. NO. 2006-056569110,R, I PCL, 1 t~ F� I �'C/�.` �_ _ _) - 117-270� 006 b3./bb - -- PCL. s 4 -- ------------------i , , � -- --- --------- -_;- _---------I------ =.==-- _- �, J J ___1_ �.94) P0B 222'75-2 65 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State II 1 I !Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain �J 2 2 2 / 5 - 2 FEE ACOUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonfo ' (714)7Si-7373/(714)545-B883 (Fax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 - 6.9 1 5 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 FOR. LOT � SOUTH RIVERSIDE Lu AND WATER MS N � u Q. , -- — � o— — — 1111'1::::,:mmir ....�..� 3 • BLOCK 73 LAND COMFANY 9/b FOR, FCL, 2 DOC, NO, 200b- 0565691 O.R, A=02°51128" R=176.53' —L=8.81'------- S81°26'22"E — 57.22' =1 5°25'16" �a — - °40'384 - — R=2851 FOR, SECTION 30 T'3RA R'blld' NCHO ELSOSRANTE MD 1/8 FCL, 1 DOC NO, 2006- — 0565691 O,R, — ------ R,S. 63/66 .00' L=767.34' _ -- M F- w uJ .3:- Q N81 161 .21 ' PROPOSED R/W� 0 3 -' °40'38"W; cn N81 v EXISTING R/W POB 123.15 w �o o op w (n n Ao 0) ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing 9 360 ( )Title to State 1 1 1 l 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 (71a1751-7 COlifo41545-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 5 • EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 c\J w _ w w N - POR, SECTION 30 L SLIDR RANCHO MS )8 E / R,S, 63/66 '_ _ `- _ 7- ��-- / / --_ -� 0=1 5°25'16" R=2851 .00` 17 DOC, 056569 110 2006- 10, R, PROPOSED R/W w w 0 � ----___ _-� - -` L=767 34L ;-, F I T- I N81 --'- 0=16°40'20" °40'38"W 123.15' R=2000.00' EXISTING R/W L=581.97' FREEWAY (-22275-2 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE ROUTE 91 2 C/L STATIONING 363 LEGEND POB Indicates TPOB Indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State III I ( Access Prohibited NOTES FEET 2 2 2 / 5 - 2 FEE ACQUISITION I Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 150 0 25 50 100 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Huftor Centre Drive, Ste. 200Santa r (714)7517373/(714�)545-8893 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 3 5 EXHIBIT B2 ' PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 M F— w w N w w POR. SECTION 30 T,3S.; R,6W, RANCHO EL SODRANTE MS 1 /8 PCL , 1 DOC, NO. 2006- 0565691 D.R. PROPOSED R/41 p=16° 40'20" R.S. i i 6„E �R), i i 41°20 45 N/ N 18.21 R=2851 .00� L=761 •34 PCL, 3 DOC, NO. 200 0565691.„0.R, 6b PCL, DOC, NO, 0565691 508° � R/W FREEWAY 222275-2 EXIST INSIDE FREE 91 RISER R��TE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING '-POR. LOT. 12-A- ASSESSOR'S MAP NO. 31 ANIS 1 /42-'13 2006- O,R, 4=03° 20'58� ' R=2837 .00/ L=165•85 137.00'_ N78°58,244 R=2p00. 6 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radiol Bearing C ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited SEE SHEET NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S DATE:06-15-2012 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa Ano, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)945-8E83 (Fox) 8 RI 91 6.9 4 5 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 v I— w w V) w w c/) S1301 j '224 (R) R-_5�745�3q„ 9.66 =76.62, 131 .00, N7g°58'24"W s �S 9> o . 9� / sue, F LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited A. T . & S.F. R.R. PROPOSED Raw 34 "12 E 140.88" R 9 F REE1 PY v�RSipE Ri 1E 9 3� 0 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CAL STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonia Ana, Coiifornio 92707 (714)7E1-7373/(714)54E-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `C1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-3 Permanent Wall Footine Easement APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 29.38 feet to a point on the general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03°07'25" to the True Point of Beginning. PA2PTG010501\SURVEYTEGALS\22275_APN_117-270-007\Legals\22275-3-PE.docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 I 2 3 PSOMAS Containing 235 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 6 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 7 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 9 ]0 11 Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 15 6faged -0./Z 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-3-PE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/ 17/2012 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-3 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 235 SO. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-27o-ooll 777-270-004 o I-...., . FR. R. nL Li119-300-027 115-060-016 Cc n � N — — — —IDOC. oc PCI 2 I NO, 2006-056569J 0,R, PCL . 1 Pei. 11 7-270-006 I - r?, PCL. rr ----TPOB-1-------------- s.. 63/ " - ---------66------ "" __-- N81 °4 212.14' -_ 'a --- O 3 POBIt I , 22275-3) ' 365 � SHEET 2 j 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CAL STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Rodiol Beoring ( ) Title to Stote J 1 l 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 / 5 - 3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distonces. All distonces ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Huttor Centre Drivel Ste. 200 C714).51n 7373!'17�14)545-8883 ('0.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 `) RI V 91 (� 6.9 1 2 • EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22275-3 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP 235 SOFT. 117-270-007 i CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH 30' Cl 25.00' 24°40'57" 10.77' C2 206.53' 03°07'25" 11.26' RADIAL DATA BEARING L Q�, w � R1 569°22'1 4"W ° Ct S� 0 U PGL 2 J LiDOC, NO 2006 - 0565691 0 , R , CD o ti vv� POR , LOT 3; DLon 13 �' o N T-D , SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND I co ino° � O � � ` AND WATER COMPANY z ��, J, 0 1 MB 9/6 o `� � o � — — — — 7", 5- 6' 22 1 A=89°51 ,1 q„i L.17: R_ 25.00' R1 —`Job _ —°2Q �A) 3 g • 21 " S 8 7 8. 54 , „E •`sue- �� `L ° \w CP . \4j. —' Cl -•- <28 5q �' ti ° `L - — — — e`" � �.,. , $�' — SRO_ — — — -_. S44 °41 '7 8"W(R)\ — — — — ° — -` p_ 5 ,P7- R=206 5352 ___ —' 7 9.65' v L=6.96 , 22275:: , N81 °40'3g4 N81 °40'384 TPOS 21 2.14 " -, PROPOSED R/W LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( )Title to Stote III I L Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 /"'J c J - 3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distonces. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonia Ana, California 92707 (714)251-73231214)545-8883 (Fox) DATE:6-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 2 2 PSOMAS 1 EXHIBIT 9D1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-4 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet 22 through a central angle of 04°34'41 "; thence South 81 °26'22" East 68.83 feet to the 23 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly 24 along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence South 25 41°19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 26 having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°51'38" East; 27 thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence 28 North 81°26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 29 30 Containing 6,614 square feet. 31 PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN_117-270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 015\Legals122275-4-PE.docx Page 1 of 10/9/2012 PS OMAS 1 See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 Prepared under the direction of 9 ]0 11 /0-09-/2 12 ' Date 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 P:12PTG0105011SURVEYTEGALS122275 APN_117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015kLegals122275-4-PE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/92012 — — • EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SOFT. 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 ,,7_270_004 oc. I 1--: SHEET 3 SHEET 4 a• r•&S•F• R.R.I I SHEET 2 II l,g_300- 115-060-016 02, v I I I�JC,I NO, 2006-05656911 ELF?, Q I"I PCL, 2 1 PCL, 1 I PO L!i 1a 117-270-0061 I 1?..s, �- I fir_ PCI r} i ---I ------- 66 I / ----I-------- __ -- �� ____ -'------ ------ - . ---- - ._— TPOB POB 22275 4 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Beoring ( ) Title to State I I I I !Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground 2 2 2 / 5 - 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200Sonic (714)751n 4373/(714)5459E883 (fo.) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 6 8 t R 1 V A 71 6.9 1 4 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 POR.. SECTION 30 PGR, LOT 3; SLOCX 73 T,3S. f R,6W, SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO 41 AND WATER COMPANY EL SOeRANTE L MD 9/6 Ma ll8 cc v) POR. PCL, 2 PCL, 1 ---) DOC, NO, 2006- DOC, NO, 2006- c 0565691 0,R. 0565691 O.R. Q W - — a - _.- R,S, 63166 �o S45°24'51 "W(R) — '' pp6 S40°50"10"W(R) IR — liti_'-- / - 0=1 5° 18'37" =2-84-3.0 L=759.69' rn ~ v PROPOSED R/W � : N81 °40'38"W 161 , � fk 21' , C2 Cl EXISTING R/W N81o40�38 vw=i w W TPOB 0 S37°58'42"W(R) POB 2'7„ CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE C1 C2 02°51'28" 04° 34'41 " 176.53' 1 76.53' 8.81' 1 4.1 0" L1 L2 S81°26"22"E N81 ° 26'22"W 68.83' 57.22' C3 15°25'16" 2851.00'767.34' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State j I I I I Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonia Ana California 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)545-B083 (Fax) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6. 9 2 4 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SOFT. 117-270-005 & 013 FOR. SECT 1 UN 30 T,3S,; R,61N. PCL. 1 R DOC, NO. 2006- EL SOBR SRA 0565691 D.R. 1`iJn^ J /2 r - R.S. 63/66 -� PROPOSED R/W — 7- __ / --....- _ �_ N / -_— - - -) ~ —�L=767•34'` 1.11 w w=15°25"16" R=2851 .00" _ _ to N- -.- w c/") =16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=581.97' --�-LLI N81°40'38"W 123.15 EXISTING R/W 1.11 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWA Y ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground I distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo 714)7 1n7373i(7o4 i415 (5-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 3 4 41 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 PPR, SECTION 30 PPR. LOT, 12-A ASSESSOR'S MAP ._ 7,3S, , R.6W. - NO. 31 - RANCHO PCL, 3 � -- AMS 1/42-43 EL SPB;-�AN7E DOC, NO, 2006- PCL, r}---� MD ll9 0565691 f1,R. _ r �rr -DOC, NO, 2J0b- R,S, 63/66 ,-- 0565691 O.R. PCL 1 i ; DOC, NO, 2006- � --- ' 0565691 0 , R , � p_p3° 15126, ; ,", 506° 431p7"E.(R) i R=-161 .'6' , . ,59„ECR, L-161..6 _ ° 4 4 _ `, Sp6 _ _ -9, .-,-- 9.71 ' PROPOSED R/W r� --_ _. - - �p'�=759.6 �f��� _ - , 5° 18'37" R=2843 ---_ p- 76.34� -2851 ,pp L= 506° 51,38��E�R1 S41 ° 1 9'57"E 12.13' w -� `.2?,275 4, 5g1.9y, N�8° 00, 0R=2000.00 w w 0 L= 58'24 W _r p=1 6° 40'20'� 508° 20 59,1E(R) EXISTING R/W IDE FREEWAY 1 RIVERS ROUT 9 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 1 6 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (714)751-7373/(714)54598883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAit: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R 1 V 91 6.9 4 4 • PSOMAS 1 EXHIBIT `E1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-5 5 Permanent Access Easement 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 83.74 feet through a central angle of 20 27°10'45" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along last said curve and said easterly line 29.96 feet 22 through a central angle of 09°43'31" to a point thereon; thence South 80°17'36" East 23 46.41 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 224.00 feet; 24 thence easterly along said curve 24.60 feet through a central angle of 06°17'32"; thence 25 South 86°35'08" East 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a 26 radius of 1,686.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 151.42 feet through a central 27 angle of 05°08'45" to the beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a 28 radius of 500.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 63.00 feet through a central angle 29 of 07°13'08"; thence South 74°13'16" East 50.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 30 northerly having a radius of 350.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 65.39 feet 31 through a central angle of 10°42' 19" to the beginning of a compound curve concave • PA2PTG0105011SURVEY\L.EGALS\22275 APN_117-270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-5-Aecess.docx Page 1 of 3 10/92012 PS OMAS 1 northerly having a radius of 1,432.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 137.16 feet 2 through a central angle of 05°29'16" to the beginning of a compound curve concave 3 northerly having a radius of 375.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 169.53 feet 4 through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave 5 southerly having a radius of 325.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 154.43 feet 6 through a central angle of 27°13'30"; thence South 89°05'30" East 63.16 feet; thence 7 South 02°32'29" West 25.01 feet; thence North 89°05'30" West 62.45 feet to the 8 beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence westerly 9 along said curve 142.55 feet through a central angle of 27°13'30" to the beginning of a 10 reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 11 said curve 180.83 feet through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a 12 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 1457.00 feet; thence westerly 13 along said curve 114.83 feet through a central angle of 04°30'56" to the beginning of a 14 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 15 said curve 80.25 feet through a central angle of 11 °29'40"; thence North 74°24'15" West 16 34.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; 17 thence westerly along said curve 35.97 feet through a central angle of 05°09'10" to the 18 beginming of a compound curve concave southerly having a radius of 1,660.00 feet; 19 thence westerly along said curve 203.64 feet through a central angle of 07°01'43 "; thence 20 North 86°35'08" West 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 21 radius of 250.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 27.46 feet through a central angle 22 of 06°17'32"; thence North 80°17'36" West 31.59 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 23 24 Containing 26,164 square feet. 25 26 See Exhibit `E2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PT0010501\SURVEY\ LEGALS\22275_APN_117-270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-5-Access.docx Page 2 of 3 10/9/2012 PSQMAS 1 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 ]0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /D-09--1Z Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEIILEGALS\22275_APN— 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015%egalsk22275-5-Access.doex Page 3 of 3 10/9/2012 — EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 S0. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 117_ 7 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 ,I d I W SHEET 2 q F- •_T.�S'F• R.R• 119'300_021 115-060-016 1 I CIc , IW PCL, 2 00C,I N0, 2006-05656911 0,R, ( PCL. 1 c Fyg' 1 1 7-270-0061 I 63/66 ' PCL 4 PP- 1--i.-r.w----rr7rJ-,•w� 4. -----_ i• TAT Tw. .,.. ,w n-, .. Tr • r�� •!�' --�- , • J---------_---- 1.0J TPOB POB 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring ( ) Title to State I II I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Santa Ano, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(7141545-8883 (Fax) - DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 1 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP, 26064 SO.FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 W cc FOR, LOT 3; SLOCX 3 PJi�, PCL, 2 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND DOC, NO, 2006- AND WATER COMPANY U5'o5671 O i�. MS 7/6 R2 TPOB FOR. SECTION 30 T,3S,; R,6W, RANCHO EL SOSRANTE ms 1/8 cc LIJ 586° 35'08"E —L 1 _�C3� 123.46' �— _ ° " Rl1686.00 08=4 51 ,42' cl R1 (22275-5) '� LST--- _-- _-- C14 N 86° 35 08 W �-- _r— 0=07°0-01 'q 3" -___ �''0 123.46' 06, �� --'— ---___ lhil _ — — — -- — — —1ONOWIMMOMiros. — — R=1660.00' L=203.64' PCL, 1 —DOC . NO._ 2006-_ 0565691 D , R , — -- — r� w w �2--. N81°40'38"W 161.21 PROPOSED R/W � : 2 N81°40'38"W ,v, POB/ 123.15' EXISTING R/W w °fie, A. e) ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY � CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE Cl 27° 10'45" 1 76.53' 83.74' L 1 S80° 1 7'36HE 46.41 ' C2 09° 4 3'31 " 1 76.53' 29.96' L5 N80° 1 7'36"W 31 .59' C3 06°17'32" 224.00' 24.60' R1 565°09'27"W C14 06°17'32" 250.00' 27.46' R2 S74°52'58"W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND CAL STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 9 360 ( ) Title to State J I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain CJ c 2 2 2 / - J PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hut*on Centre Drive, Ste. 20C Santo Ana, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(414(545-eee3 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECT 1ON 30 T,3S,• R,61/11, RANCHO RCL, 1 EL SODRANTE DOC, NO, 2006- 1V18 1/8 0565691 O.R, S74° 1 3'1 6"E C4�... C5 50.63' R,S, 63166 .- ;--z r-.. . - C 8 C13 PLC' 2 -- N i- LA N74°24'1 5"W C1 1 -- C10 - C9 34.28'/ - J - - _ - - - v i- w w EXISTING R/W PROPOSED R/W N N \� w w V' P=16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=561.97' -"- N81 °40 38 W 123.15' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY N CURVE DATA CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C4 05°08'45" 1686.00' 151.42' C9 25°54'09" 400.00' 180.83' C5 07°13'08" 500.00' 63.00' C10 04°30'56" 1457.00' 114.83' C6 10°42'19" 350.00' 65.39' C1 1 1 1 °29140" 400.00' 80.25' C7 05°29'16" 1432.00' 137.16' C12 05°09'10" 400.00' 35.97' C8 25°54'09" 375.00' 169.53' C13 07°01'43" 1660.00' 203.64' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 ( ) Title to State 1 I I 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin 2 2 2 /''J 5 - 5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (7141751'-7373i(714o154598883 (F0.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 3 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 w _ 2 w POR, LOT, 12-A PCL. 3 ASSESSOR'S MAP PJR, SECTION 30 DOC, NO, 2006- NO, 31 T.3S,- R.6W, 0565691 O.R. AMB 1/42-43 RANCHO EL SOBRANTE -7° 13, A3' --.� L2,- MB 1 /8 R . S . 63/b b D�2 0, L.1 r -f- z ; 5.0 DOC. N0. 2006- ..•- s- ,,."""...,."L4--- 0565691 J.R. 2 142• , ,% D- �- , Dy2,o 54' 0 69.53 �"' ;'� i R,300 •C0 ,, ,- L 1 315'00 �' �� '' ,, _ _---' R'- r s , �- -- �' FOL. 1 ,7 ptiog:-- _ _ 0 200, L.1a0 — �/ 0565691 O.R. '� � R=4 PROPOSED R/W i� io 1 N78 in I; w w v) N u) 582„W 4 R_2000.00 =581•9 � p-16°40'20" o ""- EXISTING R/W o v; LINE DATA 0 BEARING DISTANCE -1 -13 L2 S89°05'30"E 63.16' L4 N89°05'30"W 62.45' E FREEWAY RIVERSID 91 'ROUTE 91SIDE FREEWAY UTE /LSTATIONING RO 7 LEGEND 6 POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State J I 1 1 ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 / S - S PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonta Aro, California 92707 (714)751-7373/1714)54S-8883 (Fax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAA: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R IV 91 6. 9 4 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 -, _ N LINE DATA . BEARING DISTANCE A=00°45'34" L2 S89°05'30"E 63.16' to R=5779.66' L3 S02°32'2911W 25.01' L=76.62' L4 N89°05'3011W 62.45' v L2 140'88' A'T• S.F. R.Ra M PCB , 4 00C, NO. 2006- � -t— C75b5b91 U,r�, PUR„ LOT, 12-A ,` n 115-060-015 w z -- — ASSESSOR' S MAP rn cv N O , 31 re;o '" � AMB 1 /42-43 `' rn o w w \PROPOSED o R,S, 63l66 , R/W 'o a' lR 1 `',9'21 'S2 9 5\2 051,��. 'Ls_ b. -13 EXISTING R/W J F'i E 1 01.00' 541 ° 1 9'57&quo