Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
06 June 12, 2013 Commission
COMM-COMM-00026 RECORL1S Rime County Translation Connlksion MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, June 12, 2013 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside Alo COMMISSIONERS eth Chair - Karen Spiegel Vice Chair - Marion Ashley Second Vice Chair - Daryl Busch Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside Jeff Stone, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Bob Botts / Deborah Franklin, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / To Be Appointed, City of Blythe Ella Zanowic / Jeff Hewitt, City of Calimesa Mary Craton / Randy Bonner, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez / Eduardo Garcia, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Eugene Montanez, City of Corona Scott Matas / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / Ike Bootsma, City of Eastvale Larry Smith / Robert Youssef, City of Hemet Douglas Hanson / Ty Peabody, City of Indian Wells Glenn Miller / Michael Wilson, City of Indio Frank Johnston / Micheal Goodland, City of Jurupa Valley Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann / Wallace Edgerton, City of Menifee Tom Owings / Marcelo Co, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Kathy Azevedo, City of Norco Jan Harnik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat / Steve Pougnet, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Al Landers, City of Perris Ted Weill / Scott Hines, City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar Basem Muallem, Governor's Appointee Comments are welcomed by the Commission. It you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:38 AM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Jennifer Harmon Subject: RCTC June Commission Agenda - 06.12.2013 Attachments: Conflict of Interest Memo.pdf; Conflict of Interest Form.pdf; Agenda Cover Notice_ 06.12.13.pdf Importance: High Good morning Commissioners: The June Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 12 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy this link: http://rctc.org/uploads/media items/iune-12-2013.orieinal.pdf In addition for your review is the attached conflict of interest memo, the form, and a notice about the substantive closed session items. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:49 AM To: Tara Byerly Subject: RCTC June Commission Agenda - 06.12.2013 Good morning Commissioner Alternates: The June Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 12 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy this link: http://rctc.org/uploads/media items/iune-12-2013.original.pdf Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 Rime {aunty Transportation ConmOssion TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Office and Board Services Manager DATE: June 5, 2013 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest - Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda of June 12, 2013 The June 12, 2013 agenda of the Riverside County Transportation Commission includes items that may raise possible conflicts of interest. A Commissioner may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 9A - Best Best and Krieger LLP Agreement for General Legal Services Amendment Consultant(s) Best Best and Krieger LLP Steven DeBaun, Partner 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Agenda Item No. 9F - Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2013/14 Consultant(s): AMMA Transit Planning Heather Menninger, Principal 393 Two Trees Road Riverside, CA 92507 Bartel Associates, LLC Doug Pryor, Vice President 411 Bore! Avenue, Suite 101 San Mateo, CA 94402 RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest June 5, 2013 Page 2 Beacon Economics LLC Sherif Hanna, Managing Partner 5777 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 895 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Bechtel Infrastructure Corporation George Nomura, Project Manager 3850 Vine Street, Suite 210 Riverside, CA 92507 Best Best and Krieger LLP Steven DeBaun, Partner 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Holly Rockwell, President 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 115 Torrance, CA 90505 Fieldman Rolapp and Associates Daniel L. Wiles, Principal 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1100 Irvine, CA 92612 Geographics Lisa Van Olden, Partner 4178 Chestnut Street Riverside, CA 92501 Infotech Services Group, Inc. Alison Baiter, President 5000 Via Mesita Newbury Park, CA 91320 McGladrey LLP Jeffrey M. Altshuler, Partner 18401 Von Karman, 56' Floor Irvine, CA 92612 MuniServices, LLC Doug Jensen, SVP Client Services 7625 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 108 Fresno, CA 93711 RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest June 5, 2013 Page 3 Norton Rose Fu/bright Victor Hsu, Partner 555 South Flower Street, 41st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, LLP Mary Collins, Partner 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 RJ Gorski and Associates Raymond J. Gorski, Principal 2871 Jed Road Escondido, CA 92027 Trapeze Software Group, LLC Steve Cimicata, Secretary 8360 East Via de Ventura, Suite L-200 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Riversitie Caen Transportation Commission ATTENTION RCTC COMMISSIONERS Please note the closed session items of this agenda are substantive. Please allow sufficient time in your schedule for your attendance at the entire meeting. Your participation is important and appreciated. June 12, 2013 RCTC Conflict of Interest Farm Purpose: This form is provided to assist members of the RCTC Commissioners in meeting requirements of Government Code Section 84308 grid 87100 in documenting conflict of interests as related to RCTC Commission/Committee agenda items. instructions: Under certain circumstances, RCTC Commission may be required to disclose and disqualify themselves from participating in, influencing, or voting on an agenda item due to personal income, reel property interests, investments, business positions, or receipt ofcampaign contribution. If 'applicable, : Commissioners must personally state ;the following information, for entry into the public record, prior to consideration of the involved agenda item(s) and tum in the completed form to the Clerk of the Board prior to leaving the meeting. Art RCTC member may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the elusion from any entity or individual. I. Board Merrther lniorration . Board Memt)er North City/County Name A .. Mleetifng Date - II. Campaign Contrbudone ,� 1. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution of over $250 from �G.., , Ott ame f �e"company and/or kWh( el) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on. Agenda item , Subject: Ditsri'«'k-"-- . 2. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution of over $250 from 0 tc , N Y name of or vid 1 and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda item � , Subject: 3. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution of over $250 from , ( (Identify the name of the company and/or Individual) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda item , Subject: . 4. I have a disqualifying CarTipfligri cctmtrtbution of over $250 from , (identify the name of the company and/or individual) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda item , Subject: . ,` III. Financial Int+art 1. I have a financial interest of , from/in -rams it e.mei property interest, investment or business position) (identify name of company or property location). .. and therefore I .am abstaining, from participation on Agenda Item , Subject: 2. I have a financial interest of , from/in - - au* woo* mei Ptpety interest, investment or business position) Ode s:Hy name of carnPany or Property location) and therefore I am abstaining from participation on Agenda Item , Subject: E IV. Signature Board Member Signature: Date: Please remember you must state the, information into the public record prior to consideration of the involved agenda item(s) and turn in the completed form to the Clerk of the Board prior to leaving the meeting. ee�eie■� " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N w w w . r c t c . o r g A G E N D A * * A c t i o n s m a y b e t a k e n o n a n y i t e m l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a 9 : 3 0 a . m . W e d n e s d a y , J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 B O A R D R O O M C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , F i r s t F l o o r , R i v e r s i d e , C A I n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e B r o w n A c t a n d G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 5 4 9 5 7 . 5 , a g e n d a m a t e r i a l s d i s t r i b u t e d 7 2 h o u r s p r i o r t o t h e m e e t i n g , w h i c h a r e p u b l i c r e c o r d s r e l a t i n g t o o p e n s e s s i o n a g e n d a i t e m s , - w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e f o r i n s p e c t i o n b y m e m b e r s o f t h e p u b l i c p r i o r t o t h e m e e t i n g a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n o f f i c e , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , T h i r d F l o o r , R i v e r s i d e , C A , a n d o n t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s w e b s i t e , w w w . r c t c . o r g . I n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e A m e r i c a n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s A c t a n d G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 5 4 9 5 4 . 2 , i f s p e c i a l a s s i s t a n c e i s n e e d e d t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g , p l e a s e c o n t a c t t h e C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d a t ( 9 5 1 ) 7 8 7 - 7 1 4 1 . N o t i f i c a t i o n o f a t l e a s t 4 8 h o u r s p r i o r t o m e e t i n g t i m e w i l l a s s i s t s t a f f i n a s s u r i n g t h a t r e a s o n a b l e a r r a n g e m e n t s c a n b e m a d e t o p r o v i d e a c c e s s i b i l i t y a t t h e m e e t i n g . 1 . C A L L T O O R D E R 2 . P L E D G E O F A L L E G I A N C E 3 . R O L L C A L L 4 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S E a c h i n d i v i d u a l s p e a k e r i s l i m i t e d t o s p e a k t h r e e ( 3 ) c o n t i n u o u s m i n u t e s o r l e s s . T h e C o m m i s s i o n m a y , e i t h e r a t t h e d i r e c t i o n o f t h e C h a i r o r b y m a j o r i t y v o t e o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n , w a i v e t h i s t h r e e m i n u t e t i m e l i m i t a t i o n . D e p e n d i n g o n t h e n u m b e r o f i t e m s o n t h e A g e n d a a n d t h e n u m b e r o f s p e a k e r s , t h e C h a i r m a y , a t h i s / h e r d i s c r e t i o n , r e d u c e t h e t i m e o f e a c h s p e a k e r t o t w o ( 2 ) c o n t i n u o u s m i n u t e s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e m a x i m u m t i m e f o r p u b l i c c o m m e n t f o r a n y i n d i v i d u a l i t e m o r t o p i c i s t h i r t y ( 3 0 ) m i n u t e s . A l s o , t h e C o m m i s s i o n m a y t e r m i n a t e p u b l i c c o m m e n t s i f s u c h c o m m e n t s b e c o m e r e p e t i t i o u s . S p e a k e r s m a y n o t y i e l d t h e i r t i m e t o o t h e r s w i t h o u t t h e c o n s e n t o f t h e C h a i r . A n y w r i t t e n d o c u m e n t s t o b e d i s t r i b u t e d o r , p r e s e n t e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d . T h i s p o l i c y a p p l i e s t o P u b l i c C o m m e n t s a n d c o m m e n t s o n A g e n d a I t e m s . U n d e r t h e B r o w n A c t , t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h o u l d n o t t a k e a c t i o n o n o r d i s c u s s m a t t e r s r a i s e d d u r i n g p u b l i c c o m m e n t p o r t i o n o f t h e a g e n d a t h a t a r e n o t l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a . C o m m i s s i o n m e m b e r s m a y r e f e r s u c h m a t t e r s t o s t a f f f o r f a c t u a l i n f o r m a t i o n o r t o b e p l a c e d o n t h e s u b s e q u e n t a g e n d a f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n . Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 8, 2013 SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETINGS • 6. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receiveinputon the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; and 3) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14. 7. PUBLIC HEARING - ADOPTION OF FOUR RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT, PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN ALL OR PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ACCESSOR PARCEL NOS. 102-020-044; ' 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, AND 117-270-013; LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Page 5 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this ,report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 3 • 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-006, 13-007, 13-010, and 13-01 1, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. 8. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS - The Commissionmay add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. •s CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda 9A. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES - AMENDMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 93 1) Approve Agreement No. 07-31-164-07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 07-31-164-00, with Best Best & Krieger LLP (BBK) for additional legal services related to FY 2012/13 in the amount of $960,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 9B. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 95 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2013. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 4 9C. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Page 101 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 13-009, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14". 9D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page 108 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. 9E. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Page 126 Overview • This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis • for Quarter 4 (Q4) 2012. 9F. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 134 1) Approve the recurring contracts for fY 2013/14; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 5 9G. AGREEMENT WITH NOSSAMAN, LLP FOR ON -CALL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR SERVICES - AMENDMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 143 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-66-028-12, Amendment No. 9 to Agreement No. 06-66-028-00, for the on -call strategic partnership advisor services with Nossaman LLP (Nossaman) by extending the contract term of performance to March 9, 2018, and augmenting the agreement for an additional amount not to exceed $2.4 million plus a contingency of $240,000, for a total authorized contract value of $8,352,935; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required for the project. 9H. 2013 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 156 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2013 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. 91. 2009 MEASURE A WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL ARTERIAL FUNDS - CITY OF PERRIS PROGRAMMING REQUEST Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the request from the city of Perris (Perris) to program 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Regional Arterial funds in the amount of $2.3 million for the Harley Knox Boulevard widening project from Patterson Avenue to Perris Boulevard; 2) Approve Agreement No. 13-72-144-00 with Perris for Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funding for the construction phase; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Page 191 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 6 9J. 2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS Page 193 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the release of the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects for approximately $1 16 million of federal funding and $35 million of 2009 Western Riverside County Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funds. 9K. FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 2013 CALL FOR REHABILITATION PROJECTS - ADDITIONAL PROJECT PROGRAMMING Page 200 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve programming federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds for rehabilitation projects in the - amount of $1,268,000 as presented. 9L. 2009 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA Overview This item is for the Commission to: • Page 203 • 1) Approve the 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base "year level of $937,007 for the city of La Quinta (La Quinta) beginning with FY 2013/14; 2) Split Measure A revenues on a 50/50 basis between the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and La Quinta, until such time La Quinta reimburses CVAG for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) fees CVAG would have received from La Quinta if La Quinta had joined the TUMF program when the TUMF was established; and 3) Allocate La Quinta's share of Measure A local streets and roads funds starting in July 2013, which represents sales taxes earned in May 2013. " R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n . C o m m i s s i o n A g e n d a J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 P a g e 7 9 M . F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 - F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 / 1 6 S H O R T R A N G E T R A N S I T P L A N S P a g e 2 2 7 O v e r v i e w T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v e , i n c o n c e p t , t h e F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 - F Y 2 0 1 5 / 1 6 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n s ( S R T P s ) f o r t h e c i t i e s o f B a n n i n g , B e a u m o n t , C o r o n a , R i v e r s i d e , P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( P V V T A ) , R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( R T A ) , S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( S u n L i n e ) , a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l P r o g r a m , a s p r e s e n t e d . 9 N . F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3 F E D E R A L T R A N S I T A D M I N I S T R A T I O N ' S S E C T I O N 5 3 1 0 C A P I T A L G R A N T A P P L I C A T I O N S O v e r v i e w T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : P a g e 2 3 3 1 ) A d o p t t h e F F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s ( F T A ) S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y p r o j e c t r a n k i n g s a s r e c o m m e n d e d b y t h e l o c a l r e v i e w c o m m i t t e e ( L R C ) ; 2 ) A d o p t R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 - 0 0 8 , " R e s o l u t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n C e r t i f y i n g P r o j e c t C o n s i s t e n c y w i t h R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n " , c e r t i f y i n g t h e p r o j e c t s a r e d e r i v e d f r o m a l o c a l l y d e v e l o p e d , c o o r d i n a t e d p u b l i c t r a n s i t - h u m a n s e r v i c e s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n ( C o o r d i n a t e d P l a n ) ; a n d 3 ) I n c l u d e t h e p r o j e c t s i n t h e F e d e r a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( F T I P ) . 1 0 . P R O P O S E D M E T R O L I N K B U D G E T F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 O v e r v i e w T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : - P a g e 2 3 9 1 ) A d o p t t h e p r e l i m i n a r y F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a R e g i o n a l R a i l A u t h o r i t y ( S C R R A ) o p e r a t i n g a n d c a p i t a l b u d g e t w i t h a n t i c i p a t i o n o f a 3 t o 7 p e r c e n t f a r e i n c r e a s e ; 2 ) A p p r o v e t h e a d d i t i o n a l 9 1 L i n e s e r v i c e w i t h t w o a d d i t i o n a l p e a k p e r i o d r o u n d t r i p s ; Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 8 3) Allocate the Commission's funding commitment to the SCRRA in an • amount not to exceed $8,401,000 in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for train operations and maintenance of way plus a contingency of $2,061,500 in LTF funds for new service options and fare policy possibilities; and 4) Allocate the Commission's Section 5309 grant funds in an amount not to exceed $1,729,300 for SCRRA capital rehabilitation projects. 11. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 245 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislative activities; 2) Adopt the following positions on state legislation: a) AB 37 (Perea) — Support; b) AB 401 (Daly) — Support; c) AB 493 (Daly) Support; d) AB 543 (Campos) - Oppose; e) AB 756 (Melendez) — Support if Amended; f) SB 778 (Committee on Transportation & Housing) — Support; 3) Revise the Commission's position on the following state legislation: a) AB 179 (Bocanegra) — Neutral; and b) AB 574 (Lowenthal) — Support if Amended. 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 13. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Case Number(s): RIC 1002250, RIC 1113896, and RIC 10016058 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 12, 2013 Page 9 • 15. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting and is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SIGN -IN SHEET JUNE 12, 2013 NAME AGENCY E MAIL ADDRESS 6 ,/. d s ,5-»,19 A-1t Ai i2-42 Win, !3 5 hW� v�A c �rba�'� t hi- -Iv /v/1- V/1)--t_c. w 1ue� (% /�, �. J v re,, Ar ;717 0471V oitv- dif%:Ca ,070 -4C-P(. Cl kfii.- At fiji- m-Icl- °' hJo0E,<; \s � f ,.: ,,, ..---76 / y1, e-e_ k -,-.7.,_.67- SCE F Ka..#1/4-e_.k. ..„y4 e_yx CoveNAA__ . ct4....- .._ / ,�f(4/ cJ% ,S---- ‘e e'24 M: V / ill V -iXe. dal ftT D/s% 0 ----,\A.GLA(t.E-,c OA)J Z61 aCST A 4J ` 4-<,,ox- i_ _ ,,..,.. Wes__ .i,-, / /I ` a G ' • e Hi S CA7"Id E f)�-1, C' ,-rc `` LASC4pJ rA 1 L-LC14 ..L.NS�o 1 " o u cZS Ha\ A5 (07\ _ l � i 0/✓t We-) if )-kvvi4 t, Lb--z co keit-el i,, ,9-tot)e) c_o At 9/7%74-7 -f 123 frt_T - A / ,e,,: f S `# T - '/ 4/1/// riKNit s" RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL JUNE 12, 2013 Present Absent County of Riverside, District I gr0 County of Riverside, District II 0 County of Riverside, District III 0 )71' County of Riverside, District IV O County of Riverside, District V � 0 City of Banning O City of Beaumont � 0 City of Blythe � 0 City of Calimesa � 0 City of Canyon Lake � 0 City of Cathedral City O City of Coachella �� 0 City of Corona �6' O City of Desert Hot Springs � 0 City of Eastvale )6 0 City of Hemet ;If,. City of Indian Wells 0City of Indio0 City of Jurupa Valley � 0 City of La Quinta � 0 City of Lake Elsinore � 0 City of Menifee � 0 City of Moreno Valley � 0 City of Murrieta � 0 City of Norco � 0 City of Palm Desert 0 City of Palm Springs L'7 City of Perris "'r 0 City of Rancho Mirage � 0 City of Riverside � 0 City of San Jacinto ,�// 0 City of Temecula ,� 0 City of Wildomar 6 0 Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 j6 0 DETACH AND suBrvifr TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: ' 'unP, k21'7;)1' CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: SUBJECT OF (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) AGENDA ITEM: NAME: Te4-er P3encivi PHONE NO.051)31 i I -0232 ADDRESS: STREET CITY ZIP CODE REPRESENTING:IN i1rxintE s Ser v i ceS PHONE NO.: NAME OF AGENCY / OR A RATION / GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: SO �0 �G� 1jY . � Ve'f5� �I� RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, May 8, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Karen Spiegel at 8:30 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Steve Adams Marion Ashley Roger Berg Ben Benoit* Bob Botts Daryl Busch Jeff Comerchero Mary Craton Joseph DeConinck Rick Gibbs Berwin Hanna Douglas Hanson Jan Harnik Terry Henderson Steven Hernandez* Kevin Jeffries *Arrived after the meeting was called to order 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Frank Johnston Bob Magee Scott Mann Scott Matas Greg Pettis Larry Smith Karen Spiegel Jeff Stone John F. Tavaglione Ted Weill Ella Zanowic Commissioners Absent John J. Benoit Ginny Foat Andrew Kotyuk Glenn Miller Basem Muallem Tom Owings Adam Rush There were no requests to speak from the public. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 2 4. CLOSED SESSION 4A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Case Number(s): RIC 10022760 and RIC 1113896 There were no announcements for Closed Session items. 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Spiegel adjourned the meeting at 9:45 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 8, 2013, in the Board Room, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside,_. California. Respectfully submitted, C.)u"^"..Y3-(L_ ‘-ko-CANNI Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N M I N U T E S W e d n e s d a y , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 3 1 . C A L L T O O R D E R T h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n w a s c a l l e d t o o r d e r b y C h a i r K a r e n S p i e g e l a t 9 : 5 5 a . m . i n t h e B o a r d R o o m a t t h e C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a , 9 2 5 0 1 . 2 . P L E D G E O F A L L E G I A N C E C o m m i s s i o n e r J o h n T a v a g l i o n e l e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n a f l a g s a l u t e . 3 . R O L L C A L L C o m m i s s i o n e r s / A l t e r n a t e s P r e s e n t S t e v e A d a m s M a r i o n A s h l e y R o g e r B e r g B e n B e n o i t B o b B o t t s D a r y l B u s c h J e f f C o m e r c h e r o M a r y C r a t o n J o s e p h D e C o n i n c k R i c k G i b b s B e r w i n H a n n a D o u g l a s H a n s o n J a n H a r n i k T e r r y H e n d e r s o n S t e v e n H e r n a n d e z K e v i n J e f f r i e s 4 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S F r a n k J o h n s t o n B o b M a g e e S c o t t M a n n S c o t t M a t a s B a s e m M u a l l e m G r e g P e t t i s A d a m R u s h L a r r y S m i t h K a r e n S p i e g e l J e f f S t o n e J o h n F . T a v a g l i o n e T e d W e i l l E l l a Z a n o w i c C o m m i s s i o n e r s , A b s e n t J o h n J . B e n o i t G i n n y F o a t A n d r e w K o t y u k G l e n n M i l l e r T o m O w i n g s C o m m i s s i o n e r s ' M a r i o n A s h l e y a n d D a r y l B u s c h p r e s e n t e d L i s a D a S i l v a , C a p i t a l P r o j e c t s M a n a g e r , w i t h t h e C o n s t r u c t i o n M a n a g e m e n t A s s o c i a t i o n o f A m e r i c a 2 0 1 3 P r o j e c t A c h i e v e m e n t A w a r d f o r t h e S t a t e R o u t e 7 4 / I n t e r s t a t e 2 1 5 p r o j e c t : Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 2 Deanna Reeder, a Moreno Valley resident, read a portion of the 2009 Measure A ordinance regarding the developer improvements, noting these funds cannot be used to replace developer required infrastructure. She requested the Commission rescind its approval from Moreno Valley for the Nason Street project. She suggested if the Commission continues to condone Moreno Valley's action then the Commission may look as bad as Moreno Valley. Commissioner Jeff Stone stated this is the major interchange commuters utilize to get to the county hospital. He stated he feels very comfortable the Commission is operating within the spirit of Measure A. Steve DeBaun, Legal Counsel, expressed caution as discussion to public comments is not allowed under the Brown Act and if further discussion is necessary, the matter needs to be agendized for the next Commission meeting. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — APRIL 10, 2013 M/S/C (Henderson/Craton) to approve the minutes as submitted. Abstain: Comerchero and Smith 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, presented the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14, and discussed the following areas: • Budget process; FY 2013/14 Budget considerations; • Budget summary; • Sources by breakdown; • Sources comparison; • Expenditures by department; • Expenditure breakdown comparison; • Capital department expenditure highlights; • Functional expenditures breakdown and comparison; and • Next steps. At this time, Commissioners Roger Berg and Steven Hernandez stepped out of the meeting. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 3 Chair Spiegel opened the public hearing and requested comments from the public. No comments were received from the public. Chair Spiegel then requested comments from the Commissioners. Commissioner Jeff Stone expressed appreciation for summarizing the financials and maintaining the 1 percent threshold of Measure A funds for personnel salary and benefits. Commissioner Stone asked how much Measure A fund utilization is for the express benefits of a private developer. Michele Cisneros replied none. Commissioner Stone stated the Commission does not build infrastructure for the benefit of private developers, however, private developers do benefit from the projects the Commission builds. He commended staff for a comprehensive budget and its delivery of projects. M/S/C (Stone/Henderson) to continue the public hearing for the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14 to the Commission meeting on June 12, 2013. No: Jeffries 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions/revisions to the agenda. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Stone/Henderson) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. 8A. AGREEMENTS FOR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1) Award Agreement No. 13-19-077-00, to Logan Circle Partners, L.P. and Agreement No. 13-19-135-00, to Payden & Rygel Investment Management for investment management services for _a five-year term, and two additional one-year options to extend the agreement, for a total period of performance of up to seven years, in an aggregate amount of $1.8 million, plus a contingency amount of $200,000, for a total amount not to exceed in an aggregate- value of $ 2 million; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 4 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve • contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required during the period of services. 8B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2013. 8C. STATE ROUTE 91 PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1) Approve Agreement No. 09-31-081-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 09-31-081-00, with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. (Parsons) to provide project_ and construction management (PCM) services for Phase 2 of the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIF') widening and extension of the 91 Express Lanes design -build project in the amount of $81,410,793, plus a contingency of $6.1 million for a total amount not to exceed $87,510,793, and a total authorized contract value, for Phase 1 and 2, of $147,595,337; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required for the project. 8D. 91 EXPRESS LANES OPERATOR AGREEMENT 11 Approve the 91 Express Lanes Operator Agreement No. 13-31-105-00 between the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), and Cofiroute USA, LLC (Cofiroute) for operations and maintenance services for the 91 Express Lanes in the amount of $30,998,133, plus a contingency amount of $3,099,813, for a total amount not to exceed $34,097,946;. 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the agreement. • • " R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n M i n u t e s M a y 8 , 2 0 1 3 P a g e 5 8 E . F E D E R A L S U R F A C E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P R O G R A M 2 0 1 3 C A L L F O R R E H A B I L I T A T I O N P R O J E C T S A p p r o v e p r o g r a m m i n g f e d e r a l S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m ( S T P ) f u n d s f o r r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 2 , 1 4 2 , 0 0 0 a s s u b m i t t e d . 8 F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N U N I F O R M M I T I G A T I O N F E E P R O G R A M R E G I O N A L A R T E R I A L F U N D S C I T Y O F P E R R I S P R O G R A M M I N G R E Q U E S T 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e r e q u e s t b y t h e c i t y o f P e r r i s t o p r o g r a m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l f u n d s i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 . 3 6 m i l l i o n f o r t h e P e r r i s B o u l e v a r d w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t f r o m R a m o n a E x p r e s s w a y t o P e r r y S t r e e t ; 2 ) A c c e p t $ 2 , 3 8 8 , 0 0 0 m i l l i o n i n f e d e r a l S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m ( S T P ) f u n d s f r o m t h e P e r r i s B o u l e v a r d p r o j e c t f o r r e p r o g r a m m i n g a t t h e d i s c r e t i o n o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; 3 ) A p p r o v e A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 8 - 7 2 - 0 9 7 - 0 2 , A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 8 - 7 2 - 0 9 7 - 0 0 , w i t h t h e c i t y o f P e r r i s t o a d d T U M F f u n d i n g f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e ; a n d 4 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r o r E x e c u t i v e ' D i r e c t o r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . 8 G . A M E N D M E N T W I T H S T V I N C O R P O R A T E D T O P R O V I D E D E S I G N S U P P O R T D U R I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N F O R T H E P E R R I S V A L L E Y L I N E P R O J E C T 1 ) A p p r o v e A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 7 - 3 3 - 1 2 3 - 1 0 , A m e n d m e n t N o . 1 0 t o A g r e e m e n t 0 7 - 3 3 - 1 2 3 - 0 0 , w i t h S T V I n c o r p o r a t e d ( S T V ) f o r d e s i g n s u p p o r t d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n f o r t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e ( P V L ) p r o j e c t i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 6 , 8 4 1 , 7 4 9 , p l u s a c o n t i n g e n c y a m o u n t o f $ 1 m i l l i o n , f o r a t o t a l a m o u n t n o t t o e x c e e d $ 7 , 8 4 1 , 7 4 9 , a n d a t o t a l a u t h o r i z e d c o n t r a c t v a l u e o f $ 4 8 , 6 7 3 , 3 8 6 ; 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r o r E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d 3 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r o r d e s i g n e e , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o a p p r o v e t h e u s e o f t h e c o n t i n g e n c y a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t . Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 6 8H. LOS ANGELES — SAN DIEGO — SAN LUIS OBISPO RAIL CORRIDOR AGENCY UPDATE AND REVISED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT 1) Receive an update on the Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) implementation effort; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the 2013 Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement that allows the Commission to be included as voting member in the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency. 81. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT 1) Approve modification to SunLine Transit Agency's (SunLine) FY 2012/13 capital improvement program to reflect an additional $1,456,000 in Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5309 State of Good Repair (SGR) program funds and $314,584 in South Coast. Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) funds for the solar panels replacement and new installations project; 2) Allocate $49,416 in State Transit Assistance (STA) funds to cover needed capital matching funds for the above Section 5309 program solar panel project; and 3) Approve an amendment to SunLine's Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the changes above. 8J. AGREEMENT WITH CASE SYSTEMS, INC. FOR CALL BOX SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1) Award Agreement No. 13-45-102-00 to CASE Systems, Inc. for call box system maintenance services throughout Riverside County for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed $1 .25 million; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 7 8K. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE RISING STARS IN TRANSIT INTERNSHIP PROGRAM 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 13-25-106-00 between the Commission and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for the Rising Stars in Transit — Internships for University Students program; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the MOU on behalf of the Commission. 8L. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt a Support position on AB 1081 (Medina). 9. STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TOLL -SUPPORTED DEBT FINANCINGS Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, presented the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) Plan of Finance update, highlighting the following areas: • SR-91 CIP 2013 financing activities; • SR-91 CIP plan of finance overview; • SR-91 CIP updated sources and uses; • 2013 toll revenue bonds; • Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan; • SR-91 CIP flow of funds; • Toll -supported debt events of default; • SR-91 CIP toll financing documents; and • Next steps. Theresia Trevino introduced the financing team members. In response to Commissioner Stone's question regarding toll fees and revenues, Theresia Trevino replied the traffic and revenue study performed by Stantec was used to determine the toll fees. The Commission adopted its toll policy on June 7, 2012, which is disclosed in the official statement. Additionally, if toll revenues are not sufficient to pay for operations and debt service, then the toll fees could increase. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 8 Commissioner Stone discussed alternative fuel and electric vehicles free use of the toll roads that he believes will result in a paradigm shift and asked about the Commission's exposure if the bonds cannot be paid. Anne Mayer replied staff evaluated the traffic revenue projections analyzed for this corridor for approximately seven years. The Commission is fortunate that there are many years of operation in Orange County from which to draw real data including: 1) stress tests on traffic; 2) revenue projections; 3) and the existing electric vehicle circumstance. Commissioner Stone expressed caution that the full potential for electric vehicles on tolls has not been seen yet as these vehicles become affordable. Anne Mayer stated with the solid foundation, staff went forward in terms of the traffic and revenue projections and evaluated the demographics and the change in patterns of housing and job markets. She discussed the stress test studies, the investment grade ratings on the toll revenue bonds, and the TIFIA loan. She explained with regard to the electric vehicles, there is legislation to extend the free usage of toll lanes, which means electric vehicles are exempt from any responsibility to pay for capital improvements or operations and maintenance of the system. She discussed the fluctuations in the traffic and revenue studies and paying off the debt. At Commissioner Stone's request for clarification about paying the debt, Anne Mayer replied it is paid with toll revenues. She stated the Commission will not use Measure A or other sources to pay off the debt. Commissioner Stone expressed the bond holders are at risk in the event there is an electric car revolution and the state continues to allow these vehicles on the toll roads for free. Anne Mayer concurred and explained the Commission's responsibility is to ensure it is working within the toll policy to pay back the debt, which means staff may bring forward adjustments to the toll policy for approval. She stated the toll policy is set to manage traffic in the corridor. Theresia Trevino noted there is a revision with the financing team that reflects it does not apply to the sales tax bond proceeds in the construction fund and the pay go contribution during the construction period are excluded from the trust estate. Commissioner Bob Botts expressed appreciation for the simplified presentation. He clarified the TIFIA loan is for $451 million and asked about the $35 million difference. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 9 Theresia Trevino replied the loan was approved up to a maximum of $451 million based on the costs that are TIFIA eligible and one-third equates to $416 million based on the financial model information. She stated the loan agreement will reflect the initial loan amount. Commissioner Adam Rush asked what resource is funding the operation and maintenance and when will the facility be turned over to Caltrans. Theresia Trevino replied it is the operation and maintenance fund deposit. She stated for the first three months of operation, $3.4 million will be set aside from the toll revenue bond proceeds when operations commence. The toll facility will be turned over to Caltrans after the 50-year term. There will be a maintenance agreement executed with Caltrans. Anne Mayer explained $3.4 million is the initial deposit for operations and maintenance and the Commission is required to maintain a program for 50 years until it is turned over to Caltrans. Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, further clarified the 50 years of operations and maintenance are factored into the lifecycle costs for the project, which covers: 11 annual maintenance; 2) two longer term major pavement rehabilitation work; and 31 the toll system infrastructure will be replaced periodically throughout the 50 years. In response to Commissioner Rush's question if the funding comes from ongoing toll revenues, Theresia Trevino replied with regard to the two longer term major pavement rehabilitation work, the Commission will fund the repair and rehabilitation reserve starting when the toll operations commence. She explained a certain amount of revenues will be generated from the flow of funds that will be deposited each year. Anne Mayer clarified Measure A funds cannot be used for those repairs and rehabilitations. Michael Blomquist stated once the financing is complete and the bonds are paid off, toll revenue will fund the operations and maintenance. Commissioner Terry Henderson expressed appreciation to staff for bringing the implementing documents forward to enhance this program. She noted she does not support toll roads. As for electric cars and other vehicles subsidized with tax dollars, she does not support these programs either. She assured the Commissioners the multiple taxing ideas will come to fruition and it will be severe. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 10 Commissioner Steve Adams requested clarification that payments will commence on the TIFIA loan after construction is complete. He referred to Commissioner Stone's comment and noted history has shown if this proliferation of electric cars and CNG happens, then the incentives to buy go away and these commuters would become toll payers. Theresia Trevino stated interest payments commence in 2022 and principal payments commence in 2027. Commissioner Mary Craton stated as a former member of Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG), there were discussions about electric vehicles and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). She expressed opposition to VMT as it creates a hardship on commuters in the Inland Empire, but suggested if these discussions continue, there could be a VMT tax to pay for the maintenance and operations that includes electric vehicles. M/S/C (Gibbs/Zanowic) to: 1► Adopt Resolution No. 13-004, "Resolution Authorizing Agreements Relating to the Sale of Not to Exceed $400,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Riverside County Transportation Commission Toll Revenue Bonds in. One or More Series, Including the Execution and Delivery of a Master Indenture, a First Supplemental Indenture, a Second Supplemental Indenture, a Purchase < Contract, an Official Statement, and a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, and a Loan Agreement Relating to Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program Credit Assistance, and the Taking of All Other Actions Necessary in Connection Therewith"; 2) Approve the draft Official Statement for the issuance for a not to exceed amount of $400 million in 2013 Toll Bonds and - authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the printing and distribution of the Official Statement; 3) Approve the draft Continuing Disclosure Agreement related to the 2013 Toll Bonds between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., as dissemination agent, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final ContinuingDisclosure Agreement; 4) Confirm the approval of, and ratify proposed changes to, the draft form of the Master Indenture, previously approved by the Commission at its July 2010 meeting, between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (BNYM), as Trustee, related to the Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 11 2013 Toll Bonds and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Indenture; 5) Confirm the approval of, and ratify proposed changes to, the draft form of the First Supplemental Indenture, previously approved by the Commission at its July 2010 meeting, between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, related to the 2013 Toll Bonds and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final First Supplemental Indenture; 6) Approve the draft Second Supplemental Indenture for the TIFIA loan between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Second Supplemental Indenture; 7) Approve the draft Bond Purchase Agreement between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as Underwriter Representatives acting on behalf of themselves and J.P. Morgan Securities, (collectively the Underwriters), for the 2013 Toll Bonds and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Bond Purchase Agreement; and 8) Approve the draft TIFIA Loan Agreement between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the USDOT for an amount not to exceed $451 million and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Bond Purchase Agreement. No: Henderson At this time, Commissioner Hernandez rejoined to the meeting. 10. STATE ROUTE 91 DESIGN -BUILD CONTRACT Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, presented the State Route 91 design -build contract award, highlighting the following areas: • Two-step design -build procurement; • Commission actions at its June 2012 Commission meeting; • Factors in the evaluation; • Benefits of best value design -build; • Evaluation team organization chart; • Proposal evaluation goal; • Selection formula; • Technical proposal scoring; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 12 • • • • Atkinson/Walsh technical proposal highlights; Price score calculation; Contract price, present value, and price score; Contract award to Atkinson/Walsh; Side by side comparison of the top two teams; Negotiation of design refinements; Authorizing work and project financing; Procurement schedule; Recent procurement activity; and Staff recommendation. Michael Blomquist acknowledged the Atkinson/Walsh team in attendance to support the contract award. In response to Commissioner Rush's request for clarification regarding the difference in technical scoring, Michael Blomquist stated it does not include the contract refinements to the overall project made after the initial score. Also, staff would have initiated negotiations for those items, regardless of whom the apparent best value proposer was. Commissioner Ben Benoit asked about the warranty for this project. He -noted the incident that occurred on the 60/91 /215 interchange at the Chicago Avenue bridge. Michael Blomquist replied typical contracts have a one-year warranty for the work, however, this contract has a two-year warranty. He clarified this does not include claims for negligent or defective work after the warranty period is over. Anne Mayer discussed the issues with the 60/91 /21,5 interchange after the Chicago Avenue bridge was constructed and how it was resolved. Anne Mayer requested Michael Blomquist discuss how design deficiencies would be addressed after the warranty period. At this time, Commissioner Berg rejoined to the meeting. Michael Blomquist introduced Corey Boock, Nossaman LLP, procurement counsel for this project. Corey Boock explained generally with design being completed by the design - builder instead of an engineering firm, the Commission transfers much more risk over to the design -builder as a single point of responsibility, which is why design -build was chosen. In terms of issues outside of the warranty • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 13 period, there are contract rights and statute of limitations that apply under this contract. Also, in California there is a statute of repose, which is a 10- year latent defect period. In response to the Commissioner Benoit's question regarding the wireless vehicle detector system, Michael Blomquist explained it will be installed in the new pavement and any pavement rehabilitation work. There are approximately 60 to 80 of these devices. Commissioner Stone expressed appreciation for an outstanding presentation. He discussed the new hospital in the city of Temecula and incentives for the contractor to bring the project in under budget. He asked if similar discussions have occurred for this design -build contract. Michael Blomquist explained before the teams were prequalified and procurement began, staff looked to align the agency's project goals with procurement. One of those items was schedule and the Commission approved a weighting of technical scoring, bid, and schedule. In the scoring and criteria, the Commission valued early completion. He stated staff claimed success in that staff did incentivize the early completion through the selection process. Commissioner Stone replied there are two issues being discussed: 1) early completion; and 2) the contractual amount that goes to this contractor if there are any savings generated for this project. Michael Blomquist replied this is not how the contract was structured and it would take significant re-evaluation of the contract. Commissioner Stone stated an incentive could be beneficial and asked if there is a liquidated damages clause. Corey Boock explained if the contractor is more efficient, performs faster, and the project costs less than the bid, the savings belong to the contractor. He explained within the contract there is a concept called value engineering, which both sides initiate ideas associated with it and if the parties agree and there is a cost savings it does get split between the parties. Michael Blomquist stated the liquidated damages clause is $95,000 per day of delay if the delay is due to the contractor's work. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 14 Commissioner Stone moved the motion and requested if there are any creative additions to this contract that could incentivize it to bring the project in under budget and to share those benefits with the contractor, he is strongly in favor to amend the contract. Chair Spiegel clarified if the contractor brings the project under budget it does not have to split the savings with the Commission as the contractor receives 100 percent. Anne Mayer expressed appreciation to the Commission for its vision, leadership, and trust in staff to put together an outstanding team to develop this procurement and bring it to fruition. In addition, she expressed appreciation to staff, the consultant teams, and Atkinson/Walsh. M/S/C (Stone/Ashley) to: 1) Award Agreement No. 12-31-113-00 to Atkinson/Walsh, a Joint Venture, for the design and construction of the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) in the amount of $632,572,050, plus a contingency amount of $31,628,603, for a total amount not to exceed $664,200,653; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work to be performed pursuant to the agreement terms up to the total not to exceed amount; 4) Authorize staff to issue a Notice to Proceed No. 1 in the amount of $10 million after execution of the agreement; and 5) Authorize staff to issue a Notice to Proceed No. 2 for the remainder of the contract work after the successful sale of toll revenue and Measure A sales tax bonds and funding of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Transportation Investment Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan. At this time, Commissioner Hanson left the meeting. 11. CLOSED SESSION 11A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representatives: Executive Director Unrepresented Employees: All Commission employees other than Executive Director • • • " R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n M i n u t e s M a y 8 , 2 0 1 3 P a g e 1 5 T h e r e w a s n o a n n o u n c e m e n t f r o m t h e C l o s e d S e s s i o n i t e m . A t 1 2 : 2 7 p . m . , t h e C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g r e c o n v e n e d t o o p e n s e s s i o n . 1 2 . C L A S S I F I C A T I O N A N D C O M P E N S A T I O N S T U D Y R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S A N D R E S O L U T I O N N O . 1 3 - 0 0 5 , " R E S O L U T I O N O F T H E B O A R D O F C O M M I S S I O N E R S O F R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N F O R E M P L O Y E R P A I D M E M B E R C O N T R I B U T I O N S " M i c h e l e C i s n e r o s , A c c o u n t i n g a n d H u m a n R e s o u r c e s M a n a g e r , d i s c u s s e d t h e b a c k g r o u n d f o r c o n d u c t i n g t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a n d c o m p e n s a t i o n s t u d y . S h e t h e n p r o v i d e d a n o v e r v i e w f o r t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a n d c o m p e n s a t i o n s s t u d y r e s u l t s a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s d i s c u s s e d i n c l o s e d s e s s i o n a n d s t a f f ' s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s f o r t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f e m p l o y e e ' s c o s t s h a r i n g o f p e n s i o n b e n e f i t s . S t e v e D e B a u n n o t e d t o t h e p u b l i c t h a t a c o p y o f t h e s a l a r y s c h e d u l e i s a v a i l a b l e f o r t h o s e w i s h i n g t o h a v e a c o p y o f i t . C o m m i s s i o n e r S t o n e e x p r e s s e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n b e g a n a s a m u c h s m a l l e r o r g a n i z a t i o n a n d h a s k e p t a v e r y l e a n s t a f f w h i l e i m p l e m e n t i n g a m u l t i b i l l i o n c a p i t a l i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n . H e e x p l a i n e d a n u m b e r o f g o o d p r o f e s s i o n a l s h a v e l e f t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e n e w p a y s t r u c t u r e w o u l d a i d i n r e t a i n i n g a n d a t t r a c t i n g q u a l i f i e d e m p l o y e e s . H e e x p l a i n e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n s a l a r y e x p e n s e w o u l d s t a y b e l o w t h e 1 p e r c e n t i n M e a s u r e A , w h i c h i s i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e v o t e r s o f t h e c o u n t y . H e m o v e d t h e m o t i o n a n d a s k e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r s s h o w s u p p o r t a n d a p p r e c i a t i o n f o r i t s e m p l o y e e s . C o m m i s s i o n e r S c o t t M a n n a s k e d i f t h e r e i s a n i m p a c t o n t h e p h a s e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n p l a n f o r c o s t s h a r i n g i n t o C a I P E R S w i t h a n i n c r e a s e b y 5 0 p e r c e n t c o n t r i b u t i o n s i n c a l e n d a r y e a r s 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 2 . M i c h e l e C i s n e r o s r e p l i e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n c o n t r a c t s w i t h a n a c t u a r i a l f i r m a n d i t w i l l p e r f o r m a s t u d y i n J u l y 2 0 1 3 . C o m m i s s i o n e r A s h l e y r e p l i e d t h e e m p l o y e e ' s s h a r e w i l l r e m a i n a t 8 p e r c e n t . C o m m i s s i o n e r R i c k G i b b s n o t e d t h e e m p l o y e e s a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a r e o f a u n i q u e s k i l l s e t , a n d b e l i e v e s i t i s p r u d e n t t o p a y t a l e n t e d p e o p l e w h a t t h e y a r e w o r t h w h i l e r e m a i n i n g g o o d s t e w a r d s o f t h e p u b l i c t r u s t b y s t a y i n g w i t h i n t h e 1 p e r c e n t f i g u r e r e l a t e d t o M e a s u r e A . Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 16 Commissioner Kevin Jeffries expressed appreciation for allowing him to address the issue that was forwarded to the Commission for approval and wanted to express his concerns regarding the previous Executive Committee action. He stated in his experience in water districts, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), and every local government entity, a financial decision to authorize pay increases must be done in public session. He expressed his belief the previous action of the Executive Committee was in violation of the Brown Act, however, the current Commission action cures the problem. He expressed he does not support all of the pay increases and would vote no, and reiterated his concern the Executive Committee's previous action was a violation of the Brown Act. Steve DeBaun disagreed with Commissioner Jeffries position that the Executive Committee had violated the Brown Act. He explained the Commission had a closed session discussion and that discussion did not have an action associated with it. He stated the Executive Committee actions were taken in open session. He also apologized if there was a miscommunication with Commissioner Jeffries. Commissioner Jeffries concluded by stating he would allow the emails to be entered into the record or given to anybody that wants to see his concerns regarding the Brown Act and the responses from legal counsel. Commissioner Botts indicated most of the Executive Committee members believed the Executive Committee acted in a legal manner. He stated he clearly remembered staff explained any changes to classifications and new positions would be in the budget and discussed publicly. M/S/C (Stone/Henderson) to: 1) Consider for approval the recommended action per closed session labor negotiations to modify the pay structure effective July 11, 2013, to incorporate the new staff assignments and market rate movement since May 14, 2008, and implement salary range classifications. Subsequent exhibits will be distributed during the open Commission meeting; 2) Implement the employees' cost sharing of the Employer -Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) of 3 percent beginning July 11, 2013, with a corresponding salary increase of 3 percent respectively; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 13-005, "Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of Riverside County Transportation Commission for Employer -Paid Member Contributions'; to reflect the cost sharing of normal pension costs by employees. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 8, 2013 Page 17 No: Jeffries and Mann 13. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar. 14. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 14A. Commissioner Botts announced: • The Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) Annual Regional Conference and General Assembly was held on May 2 and 3. There were approximately 1,000 people in attendance and it was an outstanding conference; and • Commissioner Greg Pettis was elected President of SCAG. 14B. Anne Mayer announced: • The Riverside County Small Business Expo will be held on June 27, 2013; and • The Commission's Full Speed Ahead 2009 — 2019 Delivery Plan brochure was distributed to the Commissioners. III15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Spiegel adjourned the meeting at 12:44 p.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, June 12, 2013, in the Board Room, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California. Respectfully submitted, H0.1L)mk)r Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2013/14 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; and 3) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The annual fiscal budget is the result of staff determining the operating and capital needs for FY 2013/14 and identifying the resources to fund those needs. The budget process began in December 2012. The goals and objectives approved by the Commission on March 13 were the basis of this budget., The goals and objectives considered during the preparation of the budget relate to mobility initiatives, goods movement, improved system efficiencies, environmental stewardship, economic development, intermodalism and accessibility, and public and agency communications, and financial and administrative policies. On May 8, staff presented the proposed budget to the Commission. Subsequent to that presentation, staff updated the document as a result of the following changes resulting in a net decrease of $26,180,800 to the projected ending fund balance: Adjustments to Fiscal Year 2012/13 Projected Amounts: • Net decrease in investment income, operating transfers in, and debt proceeds of $654,000, $193,147,900, $665 million respectively; net increase in professional services and support costs of $5,000 and $15,000, respectively; and net decrease in projects and operations, debt service, and operating transfers out of $1,898,200, $87,566,600, and $193,147,900, respectively. While some of the adjustments related to further review and Agenda Item 6 analysis of department worksheets, significant adjustments related to the rescheduling of financial close on the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) to early July. Adjustments to Fiscal Year 2013/14 Budgeted Amounts: • A decrease of $3,266,000 in federal reimbursements for 2009 Measure A Western County highway projects following review of the budget compilation; • An increase of $11 million in state reimbursements for the SR-91 CIP as a result of the recent update to the project financing; • A net increase of $105,000 in state reimbursements for various commuter rail projects following review of the budget compilation; • A decrease of $155,000 in local reimbursements due to the incorrect classification of state reimbursements after further review and analysis; • A $700,774,000 increase in toll and sales tax revenue bonds and $16 million increase in Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan proceeds due to the SR-91 CIP financial close in July 2013; • A net increase of $282,241,900 in operating transfers in related to the updated SR-91 CIP financing and debt service reserves; • A $63,000 increase in investment income as a result of a net increase in state reimbursements and debt proceeds; • A $951,400 increase in personnel salary and benefits due to the addition of four full-time equivalents, market equity adjustments- resulting from the completion of the biennial classification and compensation study, a 3 percent cost of living adjustment offset by employee's contribution for the normal share of pension benefits, and a 3 percent pool` for merit -based salary increases; • A net increase of $1,383, 800 in professional services related to disclosure counsel and financial advisory services for the issuance of toll and sales tax revenue bonds, ridematching software enhancements, and various project development and assistance; • A net increase of $409,800 in support services related to Commission - owned station ground maintenance needs and station security projects; • A net increase of $61,000 in engineering costs related to the 60/215 East junction high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane connector project and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) regional arterial project after further review and analysis; • A net increase of $2,459,000 in construction management and support services on the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connector project, SR-74 curve widening project, and a 2009 Western County Measure A regional arterial project after further review and analysis; • A $25,050,000 increase in design -build costs on the SR-91 CIP after further review and analysis; • • Agenda Item 6 2 " A $ 2 6 9 , 0 0 0 i n c r e a s e i n r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n o n t h e 6 0 / 2 1 5 E a s t J u n c t i o n H O V l a n e c o n n e c t o r a f t e r f u r t h e r r e v i e w a n d a n a l y s i s ; " A $ 4 8 m i l l i o n i n c r e a s e i n r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n o n t h e S R - 9 1 C I P a f t e r f u r t h e r r e v i e w a n d a n a l y s i s ; " A d e c r e a s e o f $ 5 , 6 8 0 , 0 0 0 i n S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e e x p e n d i t u r e s b a s e d o n r e v i e w a n d a n a l y s i s o f S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n ( S R T P ) s u b m i s s i o n s ; " A n e t d e c r e a s e o f $ 1 , 2 5 4 , 0 0 0 i n L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d e x p e n d i t u r e s b a s e d o n r e v i e w a n d a n a l y s i s o f S R T P s u b m i s s i o n s ; " A $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 i n c r e a s e i n s p e c i a l s t u d i e s r e l a t e d t o a c o m m u t e r r a i l f e a s i b i l i t y s t u d y i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y ; " A $ 1 5 7 , 5 0 0 i n c r e a s e i n T U M F r e g i o n a l a r t e r i a l p r o g r a m e x p e n d i t u r e s a f t e r f u r t h e r r e v i e w a n d a n a l y s i s ; " A $ 8 0 m i l l i o n i n c r e a s e i n d e b t s e r v i c e p r i n c i p a l p a y m e n t s t o r e t i r e o u t s t a n d i n g c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r n o t e s w i t h 2 0 1 3 s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d p r o c e e d s ; a $ 1 5 , 0 3 5 , 1 0 0 i n c r e a s e i n d e b t s e r v i c e i n t e r e s t p a y m e n t s r e l a t e d t o t h e t o l l a n d s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d s r e l a t e d t o t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t ; a n d $ 7 . 5 m i l l i o n i n c r e a s e i n c o s t o f i s s u a n c e r e l a t e d t o t h e t o l l a n d s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d s i s s u e d i n J u l y 2 0 1 3 a f t e r f u r t h e r r e v i e w a n d a n a l y s i s o f t h e u p d a t e d S R - 9 1 C I P f i n a n c i n g p l a n ; a n d " A n e t i n c r e a s e o f $ 2 8 2 , 2 4 1 , 9 0 0 i n o p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r s o u t r e l a t e d t o t h e u p d a t e d S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t f i n a n c i n g a n d d e b t s e r v i c e r e s e r v e s . A p u b l i c h e a r i n g t o a l l o w f o r p u b l i c c o m m e n t o n t h e p r o p o s e d b u d g e t , a s r e v i s e d , i s r e q u i r e d p r i o r t o t h e a d o p t i o n o f t h e p r o p o s e d b u d g e t . T h e p u b l i c h e a r i n g w a s o p e n e d a t i t s M a y 8 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g . A f t e r t h e p u b l i c h e a r i n g i s c l o s e d o n J u n e 1 2 , a d o p t i o n o f t h e p r o p o s e d b u d g e t f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 w i l l f o l l o w . I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s f i s c a l p o l i c i e s , t h e b u d g e t m u s t b e a d o p t e d n o l a t e r t h a n J u n e 1 5 o f e a c h y e a r . T h e p r o p o s e d B u d g e t f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 i s a t t a c h e d . T h i s d o c u m e n t c o n t a i n s t h e e x e c u t i v e s u m m a r y , a s r e v i s e d , t h a t w a s p r e s e n t e d a t t h e M a y 8 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g ; t h e G a n n A p p r o p r i a t i o n s L i m i t ; t h e g u i d i n g p o l i c i e s r e l a t e d t o t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e b u d g e t ; a s u m m a r y o f t h e b u d g e t p r o c e s s ; f u n d b u d g e t s , d e t a i l s o f p r o g r a m r e v e n u e s a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s ; d e b t ; d e p a r t m e n t b u d g e t s ; a c o m m u n i t y p r o f i l e ; a n d a p p e n d i c e s i n c l u d i n g a g l o s s a r y o f a c r o n y m s , f u n d i n g d e f i n i t i o n s , a n d p r o g r a m / g e n e r a l t e r m s . A g e n d a I t e m 6 A summary of the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14 is as follows: FY 2 013 /14 Budget Revenues and other financing sources: Sales taxes -Measure A, LTF, and STA $ 232,798,000 Reimbursements (federal, state, and other) 230,839,700 TUMF 6,723,400 Other revenues 500,000 Interest on investments 4,026,500 Debt proceeds 810,774,000 Transfers in 636,325,800 Total revenues and other financing sources 1,921,987,400 Expenditures and other financing uses: Personnel salary and fringe benefits 7,949,400 Professional services 26,675,500 Support services 5,593,300 Projects and operations 856,426,500 Capital outlay 796,200 Debt service (principal, interest and costs of issuance) 135,712,300 Transfers out 636,325,800 Total expenditures and other financing uses 1,669,479,000 Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses 252,508,400 Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 590,821,600 843, 330,000 Attachment: FY 2013/14 Proposed Budget (Posted on Commission Website) Agenda Item 6 NM Mom_ Riverside County Transportation C.ommission D June 12, 2013 Honorable Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California FY 2013/14 Budget Introduction The Future is Here Thank you for your interest in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013/14 budget for the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission or RCTC). This document provides an opportunity to evaluate and review the financial backbone of an innovative and successful public transportation agency. The upcoming fiscal year will be one of unprecedented investment and construction in Riverside County's transportation infrastructure — an investment that will undoubtedly improve the area's mobility and economic standing for decades to come. Once again, RCTC is presenting its largest and most comprehensive budget in its 36-year history which includes the beginning of construction for the $1.3 billion State Route (SR)-91 Corridor Improvement Project. This major project reveals the agency's comprehensive approach to mobility with investments in highway capacity, toll road development, rail transit, and express bus service that links all of it together. In addition to building its own projects, RCTC has been a conduit for financing a number of local projects as well. In just four years inclusive of 2011 through 2014, more than $4 billion in construction spending will be devoted to transportation projects constructed by RCTC, the County of Riverside (County), local cities, or the California Department of Transportation (Ca!trans). The obvious reason for this commitment is to invest in a better transportation system resulting in better mobility, but we are also investing in Riverside County's future. It's a future that should include more local jobs, new businesses being formed, employers moving to the area, and making it easier to access numerous locales that will appeal to visitors throughout the world. People Working — Building a Better Future The Commission and its project partners at Ca!trans, local jurisdictions, and transit agencies are investing in transportation using a variety of local, state, and federal sources to build projects, plan and design new improvements, and get people working and contributing to the local economy. The results of the work are coming to fruition with improvements completed on the southern portion of Interstate (1)-215, the 74/215 interchange, I- 10 interchanges in the Coachella Valley, and work speeding ahead on SR-91 in Riverside and the 60/215 interchange on the Riverside/Moreno Valley border. During FY 2013/14, the Commission will invest $751 million in capital projects that include highway, regional arterial, and rail projects. The Commission's overall budget will exceed $1 billion and includes funding of transit operations, payments to cities and the County for street and road improvements, and management of smaller programs such as motorist and commuter assistance. The Commission's status has become somewhat unique in Southern California. As many transportation agencies have consolidated functions and grown in size, the Commission remains true to the original intent of the state of California (State) legislation that first created it —now operating with a staff of 46 budgeted positions. This maintains the original vision of the Legislature when it created the Commission in 1976. By doing so, the Commission remains effective in its role as a transportation planning and funding agency by maintaining productive relationships with other agencies. For example, Measure A funds local transportation priorities and needs. In FY 2013/14, the Commission will return $44 million in funding to local cities and the County for local streets and roads needs. The Commission also receives and programs funding from state and federal sources. This includes the State's Transportation Development Act program dollars that are allocated primarily to the County's major public transit providers. Measure A also pays its share by funding transit fare discounts and programs for senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited means and by operating a commuter assistance program that provides traveler information and ridesharing assistance to employers and commuters. The 5R-91 Corridor improvement Project in Corona: Fuli Speed Ahead In May 2013, the Commission approved a $632.6 million design -build contract to widen SR-91 through Corona. The project will add two tolled express lanes and a general purpose in each direction of SR-91 between the Orange County line and 1-15. Additional project improvements will include enhanced transit service along the corridor, a collector -distributor lane system near the 1-15 and Main Street, and better connections between SR-91 and 1-15 including a direct connector to the 91 Express Lanes from the northbound 1-15. The $1.3 billion project, which breaks ground in 2013, is expected to generate 16,000 new jobs and will be the largest ever funded by the Commission. This year's budget also reflects an ongoing investment in project development work which includes the acquisition of needed right of way. The eventual completion of the project will culminate in a transformation of Riverside County's transportation system with reduced congestion, toll lane options, and enhanced transit service. The overall economic effect for the County will be significant and will aid economic development opportunities throughout the region. Perris Valley Line Project: A Needed Regional Priority Yet another regionally significant project is the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension which awaits environmental and legal approvals and is scheduled to break ground during the upcoming fiscal year. The project will extend Metrolink from Downtown Riverside to South Perris, enabling Metrolink to serve additional Riverside County residents and employers. It will also establish a much stronger transit backbone that will complement existing and future bus service, pedestrian and active transportation improvements, and economic development efforts. Maior Corridors Seeing Major Investment 1-215: Construction crews completed a new lane in each direction along a six -mile stretch of the southern segment of 1-215—a project which is being funded through Measure A and state bond funding. This is now being followed by a similar project along a 12.5-mile portion of the central segment of 1-215. At the northern edge of the I-215 and SR-60, the East Junction HOV lanes connector project is underway. The Commission completed the project development for this effort, and Caltrans is responsible for the construction activities. Additionally, constructing has begun to add a new carpool lane in each direction from the 60/91/215 interchange all the way into San Bernardino County. The lead agency for this bi-county project is the San Bernardino Associated Governments. 1-10: Construction has been completed on rebuilt and expanded freeway interchanges at Palm Drive, Indian Canyon Drive, Bob Hope Drive, and Date Palm Avenue in the Coachella Valley. The completed projects were funded through a combination of federal, state, Measure A, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee funding. Two additional projects on Jefferson Avenue and Monterey Avenue are currently in project development. Caltrans and the County are the lead agencies for these projects. 5R-91: Construction is underway on the addition of a carpool lane along a six -mile stretch of SR-91 through downtown Riverside. The project will not only widen SR-91 through downtown Riverside but will also rebuild and improve a number of interchanges and local connections with the freeway. A Commitment to Riverside County Ensuring local funding for transportation will require ongoing outreach to the public and transparent oversight and management that ensures public confidence in the Commission's fiduciary, oversight, and visionary roles. This budget document is intended to demonstrate the Commission's commitment to the public as well as documenting the Commission's dedication to sound budget practices. This budget document is one of many ways the Commission works to ensure public accountability and full transparency of its actions. Yet another Commission priority is in customer service and is demonstrated in our investment in thg 1E511 Traveler Information Service and other motorist service programs such as outreach to employers for ridesharing assistance, the maintenance and establishment of freeway call boxes, and the Freeway Service Patrol program. As the Commission adds more responsibilities to become a toll facility operator, it will increase RCTC's interaction with the public which will only strengthen our commitment to communicating in an effective and proactive manner. We welcome public input and participation and invite you to visit our website at www.rctc.org or to follow us on Twitter @RCTC. GFOA Distinguished Budget Award The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to RCTC for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, an operations guide, a financial plan, and a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. The Commission believes that this budget continues to conform to program requirements, and it will be submitted to GFOA to determine the Commission's eligibility for another award. Acknowledgements The preparation of this budget has been a collaborative effort of the Commission's staff. The budget reflects the Commission's desire to communicate the components of the budget in terms that are easily understandable and supportable for the general public. Staff acknowledges and appreciates the guidance and leadership of the Board of Commissioners and the sense of renewal and commitment it has and continues to inspire. Signature on file Signature on file Anne Mayer, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMISSION INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Budget Overview Commission Personnel Department Initiatives Fund Balances Budget Comparative Operating and Capital Budget Budget by Governmental Fund Type Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Section 1: GUIDING POLICIES Commission Policy Goals and Objectives Financial and Administration Policies Policy Matrix Section 2: BUDGET PROCESS SUMMARY Budget Process Functional Organization Chart Staff Organization Chart Section 3: FUND BUDGETS Budgetary Basis and Fund Structure General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds Debt Service Fund Section 4: REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES Revenues and Other Sources Program Revenues and Other Sources Section 5: COMMISSION DEBT Debt Debt Capacity Analysis Aggregate Debt Service Schedule Outstanding Debt and Debt Service Requirements Program and Geographic Debt Outstanding Legal Debt Margin Section 6: DEPARTMENT BUDGETS Budget Comparison by Department 6.1: MANAGEMENT SERVICES Executive Management Administration Legislative Affairs and Communications Finance 6.2: REGIONAL PROGRAMS Planning and Programming Rail Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assistance Narrative discussion of the history of the Commission and list of principal officers Narrative overview of the operational and financial factors considered Summarized narrative overview, charts, and tables of sources and uses Personnel expenditures and full-time equivalents Major initiatives and summarized uses by department Projected fund balances by governmental fund type and program Schedule of budget by summarized line item Schedule of budget classified by operating and capital purposes Schedule of budget by governmental fund type Listing of budgeted capital project expenditures by program Narrative discussion of the appropriations limit Narrative description of policy goals and objectives Description of financial policies Linkage of policy goals to departmental goals and objectives Narrative description of various budget stages Organization chart by Commission functions Organization chart of budgeted staff Narrative description of budgetary basis and fund structure Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses by Measure A and non -Measure A special revenue funds Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses Overview; narrative and charts of sources and uses Narrative description of various revenues and other sources; schedule of funding sources by department/program; definitions and background Narratives of revenues by program Narrative discussion of debt programs Charts and accompanying narrative demonstrating debt capacity Schedule of debt maturities by year for sales tax bonds Description of outstanding debt and related debt service requirements as of June 30, 2014 Charts of debt service by program and geographic area Schedule of calculation of legal debt margin Schedule of revenues, expenditures, and other financing sources (uses) by department Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses 6.3: CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Project Development and Delivery Location of Capital Projects Capital Projects Summary Local Streets and Roads Summary Section 7: COMMUNITY PROFILE Riverside County Demographics Statistical Information Commission Facts Section g: APPENDICES Glossary of Acronyms Funding Definitions Program Terms General Terms Goals and objectives, key assumptions and budgeted uses Local map of major capital projects for current year Narrative description of each capital project Schedule of local streets and roads disbursements by local agency Narrative discussion of Riverside County's community profile Charts of various demographic data Charts and tables of various statistkal information Narrative overview of the Commission's programs and services Explanation of commonly used abbreviations Narrative description of various funding sources Description of Commission programs and related terms Commonly used terms in governmental accounting and finance Commission Introduction State of California (State) law created the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission or RCTC) in 1976 to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County (County). The Commission's mission is to assume a leadership role in improving mobility in the County. The governing body consists of all five members of the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's 28 cities, and one non -voting member appointed by the Governor of California. The Commission is responsible for setting policies, establishing priorities, and coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and other agencies. The Commission also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal, state, and local funds for highway, transit, rail, non -motorized travel (bicycle and pedestrian), and other transportation activities. The Commission serves as the tax authority and implementation agency for the voter approved Measure A Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Measure A was originally approved by the County's electorate in 1988 and imposed a one-half of one cent transaction and use tax (sales tax) to fund specific programs that commenced in July 1989 (1989 Measure A). The 1989 Measure A was approved for 20 years and expired on June 30, 2009. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A beginning in July 2009 through June 2039 (2009 Measure A). Additionally, the Commission provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. These services include the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a program that provides call box service for motorists; the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP), a roving tow truck service to assist motorists with disabled vehicles on the main highways of the County during peak rush hour traffic periods; and Inland Empire 511 (IE511), a traveler information system. These services are provided at no charge to motorists and are funded through a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations. The Commission is also legally responsible for allocating Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds, the major source of funds for transit in the County. The TDA provides two sources of funding: the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), which is derived from a one -quarter of one cent state sales tax, and State Transit Assistance (STA), which is now derived from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel. Prior to 2010, STA revenues included the tax on gasoline. Finally, the Commission has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the County. As the CMA, the Commission coordinates with local jurisdictions in the establishment of congestion mitigation procedures for the County's roadway system. Name Kevin Jeffries John F. Tavaglione Jeff Stone John J. Benoit Marion Ashley Bob Botts Roger Berg Joseph DeConinck Ella Zanowic Mary Craton Greg Pettis Steven Hernandez Karen Spiegel Scott Matas Adam Rush Larry Smith Douglas Hanson Glenn Miller Frank Johnston Terry Henderson Bob Magee Scott Mann Tom Owings Rick Gibbs Berwin Hanna Jan Harnik Ginny Foat Daryl Busch Ted Weill Steve Adams Andrew Kotyuk Ron Roberts Ben Benoit Basem Muallem Riverside County Transportation Commission List of Principal Officials Board of Commissioners Title Member Member Member Member Vice Chair (Commission) Member Member Member Chair (Budget and Implementation Committee) Member Member Member Chair (Commission) Vice Chair (Eastern Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Member Member Vice Chair (Budget and Implementation Committee) Member Vice Chair (Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Chair (Eastern Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Member Member Member Member Member Member Member 2nd Vice Chair (Commission) Member Member Chair (Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee) Member Member Governor's Appointee Management Staff Anne Mayer, Executive Director John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director Agency County of Riverside, District 1 County of Riverside, District 2 County of Riverside, District 3 County of Riverside, District 4 County of Riverside, District 5 City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Eastvale City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of Jurupa Valley City of La Quinta City of Lake Elsinore City of Menifee City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula City of Wildomar Caltrans, District 8 Executive Summary Introduction The budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013/14 is presented to the Board of Commissioners (Board) and the citizens of Riverside County. The budget outlines the projects the Commission plans to undertake during the year and appropriates expenditures to accomplish these tasks. The budget also shows the funding sources and fund balances that will be used for these projects. This document will serve as the Commission's monetary guideline. To provide the reader a better understanding of the projects, staff has included descriptive information regarding each department and major projects. The discussion in each department includes a review of accomplishments, major initiatives, and key assumptions. Staff used the goals and objectives approved at the Commission meeting on March 13, 2013, to prepare this budget. In addition to the Commission's long-term goals and strategic plan, the short-term factors listed below were used to guide the development of the budget: Operational • Aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, and construction processes on the State Route (SR) 91, Interstate (I) 15, and 1-215 projects included in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice by continuing property acquisition and commencing construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project and continuing to develop tolled express lanes on 1-15. • Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in western Riverside County (Western County). • Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities. • Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A. • Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment projects. • Work with local and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of the highways and regional arterials. • Continue cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) regarding the Small Starts process to support activities for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension (Perris Valley Line) project. • Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving the County. • Support innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders with special transit needs. • Support cost controls and promote operating efficiency for transit operators. • Maintain effective partnerships among commuters, employers, and government to increase the efficiency of our transportation system by encouraging and promoting motorized and non -motorized transportation alternatives. • Continue to provide a motorist aid system that ensures safety and convenience to freeway motorists. • Maintain an active involvement in state and federal legislative matters to ensure that the Commission receives proper consideration for transportation projects and funding. • Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality -of -life needs for Riverside County. • Maintain close communication with Commissioners and educate policy makers on all issues of importance to the Commission. Financial • Fund administrative costs with allocations from Measure A, LTF, FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds. • Maintain administrative program delivery costs below the policy threshold of 4% of Measure A revenues; the FY 2013/14 Management Services budget is 2.45% of Measure A revenues. " M a i n t a i n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e s a l a r i e s a n d b e n e f i t s a t l e s s t h a n 1 % o f M e a s u r e A r e v e n u e s ; t h e F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 a d m i n i s t r a t i v e s a l a r i e s a n d b e n e f i t s i s . 9 2 % o f M e a s u r e A r e v e n u e s . " C o n t i n u e t o m a i n t a i n p r u d e n t c a s h r e s e r v e s t o p r o v i d e s o m e l e v e l o f i n s u l a t i o n f o r u n p l a n n e d e x p e n d i t u r e s . " M a i n t a i n c u r r e n t p o s i t i v e b o n d r a t i n g s w i t h r a t i n g a g e n c i e s . " M o v e f o r w a r d o n M e a s u r e A p r o j e c t s f o r h i g h w a y s a n d r e g i o n a l a r t e r i a l s u s i n g s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e s , T U M F r e v e n u e s , a n d s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l f u n d i n g a s w e l l a s f i n a n c i n g a l t e r n a t i v e s s u c h a s c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r , s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d s , t o l l r e v e n u e b o n d s , a n d f e d e r a l l o a n s . " E s t a b l i s h a n d m a i n t a i n r e s e r v e s f o r t o l l o p e r a t i o n s , c a p i t a l i m p r o v e m e n t s , a n d d e b t s e r v i c e i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t o l l s u p p o r t e d d e b t a g r e e m e n t s . " A d o p t t o l l r e v e n u e p o l i c i e s t o e s t a b l i s h c o n g e s t i o n p r i c i n g i n o r d e r t o m a x i m i z e t h r o u g h p u t o n t o l l f a c i l i t i e s . " L e v e r a g e a n d p r o t e c t p a s t M e a s u r e A i n v e s t m e n t s i n r a i l w i t h s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l f u n d i n g f o r a d d i t i o n a l r a i l i m p r o v e m e n t s , i n c l u d i n g t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e . " M a i n t a i n t h e e n t e r p r i s e r e s o u r c e p l a n n i n g ( E R P ) s y s t e m t o i n t e g r a t e p r o j e c t a c c o u n t i n g n e e d s a n d i m p r o v e a c c o u n t i n g e f f i c i e n c y . B u d g e t O v e r v i e w T o t a l s o u r c e s ( T a b l e 1 ) a r e b u d g e t e d a t $ 1 , 9 2 1 , 9 8 7 , 4 0 0 , w h i c h i s a n i n c r e a s e o f 2 7 9 % o v e r F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 p r o j e c t e d s o u r c e s a n d a 2 % i n c r e a s e o v e r t h e F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 r e v i s e d b u d g e t . T o t a l s o u r c e s a r e c o m p r i s e d o f r e v e n u e s o f $ 4 7 4 , 8 8 7 , 6 0 0 , t r a n s f e r s i n o f $ 6 3 6 , 3 2 5 , 8 0 0 , a n d d e b t p r o c e e d s o f $ 8 1 0 , 7 7 4 , 0 0 0 . T h e p r o j e c t e d f u n d b a l a n c e a t J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 3 a v a i l a b l e f o r e x p e n d i t u r e s ( e x c l u d i n g r e s e r v e s f o r d e b t s e r v i c e o f $ 4 8 , 5 5 9 , 9 0 0 a n d a d v a n c e s r e c e i v a b l e o f $ 3 2 , 8 1 8 , 2 0 0 ) i s $ 5 0 9 , 4 4 3 , 5 0 0 . A c c o r d i n g l y , t o t a l f u n d i n g a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 b u d g e t t o t a l s $ 2 , 4 3 1 , 4 3 0 , 9 0 0 . T a b l e 1 S o u r c e s F Y 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 4 F Y 1 1 / 1 2 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 F Y 1 3 / 1 4 D o l l a r P e r c e n t A c t u a l R e v i s e d B u d g e t P r o j e c t e d B u d g e t C h a n g e C h a n g e M e a s u r e A S a l e s T a x $ 1 3 4 , 9 8 4 , 3 0 0 $ 1 4 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 4 % L T F S a l e s T a x 6 6 , 5 5 6 , 7 0 0 6 9 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 6 9 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 7 2 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 4 % S T A S a l e s T a x 1 3 , 4 8 7 , 5 0 0 1 4 , 2 1 2 , 5 0 0 1 4 , 2 1 2 , 5 0 0 1 3 , 2 9 8 , 0 0 0 ( 9 1 4 , 5 0 0 ) - 6 % I n t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l 5 1 , 5 1 6 , 9 0 0 9 3 , 7 5 8 , 4 0 0 6 4 , 8 4 5 , 1 0 0 2 3 0 , 8 3 9 , 7 0 0 1 3 7 , 0 8 1 , 3 0 0 1 4 6 % T U M F R e v e n u e 8 , 1 1 6 , 4 0 0 7 , 5 5 7 , 3 0 0 7 , 2 6 8 , 2 0 0 6 , 7 2 3 , 4 0 0 ( 8 3 3 , 9 0 0 ) - 1 1 % O t h e r R e v e n u e 1 , 4 3 0 , 1 0 0 8 8 2 , 8 0 0 4 9 3 , 5 0 0 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( 3 8 2 , 8 0 0 ) - 4 3 % I n v e s t m e n t I n c o m e 4 , 3 0 8 , 3 0 0 7 , 2 6 5 , 9 0 0 3 , 9 8 6 , 3 0 0 4 , 0 2 6 , 5 0 0 ( 3 , 2 3 9 , 4 0 0 ) - 4 5 % O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 1 2 3 , 9 7 7 , 2 0 0 3 2 8 , 1 1 8 , 6 0 0 1 2 5 , 5 3 6 , 1 0 0 6 3 6 , 3 2 5 , 8 0 0 3 0 8 , 2 0 7 , 2 0 0 9 4 % D e b t P r o c e e d s 4 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 2 0 , 1 7 2 , 0 0 0 8 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 8 1 0 , 7 7 4 , 0 0 0 ( 4 0 9 , 3 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 - 3 4 % T O T A L S o u r c e s $ 4 4 4 , 3 7 7 , 4 0 0 $ 1 , 8 8 2 , 4 6 7 , 5 0 0 $ 5 0 6 , 8 4 1 , 7 0 0 $ 1 , 9 2 1 , 9 8 7 , 4 0 0 $ 3 9 , 5 1 9 , 9 0 0 2 % R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y h a s a n u m b e r o f c o m p e t i t i v e a d v a n t a g e s o v e r n e a r b y c o a s t a l c o u n t i e s ( L o s A n g e l e s , O r a n g e a n d S a n D i e g o ) : ( i ) h o u s i n g t h a t w a s ( a n d r e m a i n s ) m o r e a v a i l a b l e a n d a f f o r d a b l e ; a n d ( i i ) p l e n t i f u l c o m m e r c i a l r e a l e s t a t e a n d a v a i l a b l e d e v e l o p m e n t l a n d a t l o w e r r a t e s . P r i o r t o t h e n a t i o n a l r e c e s s i o n , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ' s e c o n o m y t h r i v e d , r e f l e c t i n g t h e a r e a ' s c o m p e t i t i v e a d v a n t a g e s o v e r i t s n e i g h b o r i n g c o u n t i e s , l a r g e l y a s a r e s u l t o f t h e C o u n t y ' s c o n t i n u i n g a b i l i t y t o d r a w j o b s , r e s i d e n t s , a n d a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g a w a y f r o m t h e L o s A n g e l e s , O r a n g e , a n d S a n D i e g o c o u n t y a r e a s . A s a r e s u l t , t h e C o u n t y e n j o y e d a m o r e d i v e r s i f i e d e m p l o y m e n t a n d c o m m e r c i a l b a s e a n d a n i n c r e a s i n g s h a r e o f t h e r e g i o n a l e c o n o m y . D u r i n g t h e n a t i o n w i d e r e c e s s i o n , t h e C o u n t y e x p e r i e n c e d h i g h u n e m p l o y m e n t ; r e d u c e d p e r s o n a l i n c o m e , t a x a b l e s a l e s , a n d r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s ; a d e c r e a s e i n t h e r a t e o f h o m e s a l e s a n d t h e m e d i a n p r i c e o f s i n g l e - f a m i l y r e s i d e n c e s ; a n d h i g h r a t e s o f n o t i c e s o f d e f a u l t o n m o r t g a g e l o a n s s e c u r e d b y s i n g l e - f a m i l y r e s i d e n c e s . T h e i m p a c t o f t h e r e c e s s i o n w a s a m p l i f i e d i n t h e I n l a n d E m p i r e ( i . e . , R i v e r s i d e a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o c o u n t i e s ) d u e t o i t s relatively greater growth and the relatively lower average income levels when compared to coastal areas. These factors resulted in fluctuating Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues and TUMF fees; however, as noted on Chart 1 the sales tax revenues appear to have stabilized since FY 2009/10. Chart 1— Commission Sources Trend $900,000,000 $800,000,000 $700,000,000 $600,000,000 $500,000,000 $400,000,000 $300,000,000 $200,000,000 $100,000,000 t Measure A Sales Tax f LTF Sales Tax t STA Sales Tax —W—TUMF —A—Federal, State, Local Revenues — *—Operating Transfers In -- DebtProceeds FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Recovery from the nationwide recession in the local Inland Empire economy has lagged the nation and other areas of California. Sales tax revenues have rebounded from the recent economic downturn's low point in 2010. The Commission's economic outlook for FY 2013/14 continues to be cautiously optimistic; however, the state and federal budget issues continue to affect funding of the Commission's capital projects and programs. Should Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues continue to fluctuate and the availability of federal and state revenues continue to be uncertain, the timing and scope of the Commission's projects and programs may be impacted. While the Commission's primary revenues are the Measure A and LTF sales taxes, other revenues and financing sources are required to fund the Commission's programs and projects as illustrated in Chart 2. Chart 2 — Sources: Major Categories Measure A Sales Tax Debt Proceeds 42% 8% LTF Sales Tax 4% STA Sales Tax 1% Intergovernmental 0 pe rating Transfe rs trn 33% 12% TUMF Revenue 0% Other Revenue O% Investment Income 0% The State Board of Equalization (SBOE) recently provided to cities and other agencies its projections that statewide taxable sales over the next fiscal year will increase 5.45%. However, given the tenuous local economy, the Commission is not basing its estimate of revenues on the SBOE's projection and will continue its conservative projection practices. After taking the state of the local economy and recent optimistic revenue trends into consideration, staff projects Measure A sales tax revenues of $147,000,000 for FY 2013/14. This is a 4% increase from the FY 2012/13 revised projection of $141,000,000. At midyear the Commission will reassess sales tax revenue projections based on the economy and revenue trends. On behalf of the County, the Commission administers the LTF for public transportation needs, local streets and roads, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The majority of LTF funding received by the County and available for allocation is distributed to all public transit operators in the County, and the Commission receives allocations for administration, planning, and programming in addition to funding for rail operations included in the commuter rail Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The LTF sales tax revenue received from the State is budgeted at $72,500,000; an increase of 4% from the FY 2012/13 revised projection of $69,500,000. STA funds generated from the statewide sales tax on motor vehicle fuel are allocated by formula by the State Controller to the Commission for allocations to the County's public transit operators; however, these funds have been subject to suspension in past years due to the State's budget issues. The STA transit allocation, which is based on recent State estimates, for FY 2013/14 is $13,298,000. Intergovernmental revenues include reimbursement revenues from federal sources of $94,389,000, state sources of $133,496,300, and local agencies of $2,954,400 for highway and rail capital, rail operations and station maintenance, commuter assistance, and motorist assistance programs as well as planning and programming activities. Reimbursement revenues vary from year to year depending on project activities and funding levels. As a result of an amended Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Commission will receive 48.7% of TUMF revenues (as updated by the most recent Nexus study). TUMF represents fees assessed on new residential and commercial development in Western County. FY 2013/14 TUMF fees are expected to remain flat at $6,300,000 to reflect the slow but encouraging signs in the housing market in the Inland Empire, and additional TUMF zone reimbursements of $423,400 are expected for the 74/215 interchange project. Other revenue of $500,000 is projected to decrease 43% from the prior year's budget of $882,800 and is related to property management revenues from properties acquired in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Investment income is anticipated to decrease in FY 2013/14 as a result of increased activity with the Perris Valley Line and the SR-91 corridor improvement projects. Staff continues to actively manage its resources and make appropriate investments to maximize the return to the Commission without sacrificing security and affecting short- term cash requirements. Transfers in of $636,325,800 relate primarily to the transfer of available debt proceeds for highway and regional arterial projects; LTF funding for general administration, planning and programming, rail operations and station maintenance, and grade separation project allocations; approved interfund allocations for specific projects; and debt service requirements from highway, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects. Debt proceeds consist of the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes related to the 1-15 and 1-215 corridor improvements projects, $404,646,000 and $207,512,000, including bond premiums of $68,616,000, in sales tax and toll revenue bonds, and a $110,000,000 federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Total uses (Table 2), including transfers out of $636,325,800, are budgeted at $1,669,479,000, an increase of 72% from the prior year budget amount of $970,284,000. Program expenditures and transfers out totaling $1,520,181,300 represent 91% of total budgeted uses in FY 2013/14. Program costs have increased by 87% from $813,841,800 in FY 2012/13. Table 2 — Uses FY 2012-2014 Capital Highway, Rail, and Regional Arterials Capital Local Streets and Roads Commuter Assistance Debt Service Management Services Motorist Assistance Planning and Programming Public and Specialized Transit Rail Maintenance and Operations TOTAL Uses FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget $ 238,856,700 $ 637,362,200 40,127,900 42,129,000 3,317,600 4,190,100 61,532,600 143,413,000 17, 714, 600 13, 029, 200 4,942,900 6,169,300 3,399,900 4,994,100 68,068,600 104,443,800 20,202, 600 14, 553,300 $ 458,163,400 $ 970,284,000 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change 311,301,700 $ 1,322,975,400 $ 685,613,200 108% 42,129,000 43,825,900 1,696,900 4% 4,348,700 4,523,900 333,800 8% 22,990,600 135,712,300 (7,700,700) -5% 11,934,000 13,585,400 556,200 4% 6,048,900 6,755,500 586,200 10% 3,538,600 5,845,000 850,900 17% 77,742,900 120,770,000 16,326,200 16% 11,564,300 15,485,600 A2,300 6% 491,598,700 $ 1,669,479,000 $ 699,195,000 72% Note: Management Services includes Executive Management, Administration, Legislative Affairs and Communications, and Finance. Capital highway, rail, and regional arterials budgeted uses of $1,322,975,400 are 108% higher compared to the FY 2012/13 budget due to project activities on the Perris Valley Line and significant right of way activities and commencement of construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project in addition to transfers out of debt proceeds from capital projects funds to special revenue funds to finance 2009 Measure A Western County highway project costs as well as to debt service funds. Local streets and roads expenditures of $43,825,900 reflect an increase of 4% over the FY 2012/13 budget and represent the disbursements to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. Debt Service of $135,712,300 has decreased 5% as a result of the retirement of $80 million of outstanding commercial paper notes in FY 2013/14 from sales tax revenue bond proceeds issued in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project financing. Additionally, debt service requirements related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project current plan of finance are lower than estimated in the prior plan of finance. Commuter Assistance budgeted expenditures of $4,523,900 are 8% higher than FY 2012/13 budget due to increased expenditures related to projects and operations activities. Management Services expenditures have increased 4% from the FY 2012/13 budget due to information technology equipment upgrades. Motorist Assistance expenditures have increased 10% or $586,200 from the FY 2012/13 budget as a result of increased demand for freeway service patrol services supporting construction projects. Planning and Programming budgeted expenditures of $5,845,000 reflect a 17% increase from the FY 2012/13 budget due to increased projects and operations activities in connection with LTF disbursements for planning and programming and grade separation projects. Public and Specialized Transit budgeted expenditures of $120,770,000 are 16% higher than FY 2012/13 budget due to increased transit capital expenditures for public transit. The 6% increase in Rail Maintenance and Operation's budgeted expenditures of $15,485,600 is primarily due to additional consultant work needed to perform planning and modeling for rail projects including the SR-91/Perris Valley Line expansion and Coachella Valley rail service. Total uses included in the FY 2013/14 budget by major categories are illustrated in Chart 3. Chart 3 — Uses: Major Categories Planning and Programming 0% MotoriSt Assisrarl re 1% Management Services 1% Debt Servitor dx CommuterAsslstance - O% Capital local Streets and Roads 3% Commission Personnel Publlcand Spedallzed Transit 7% Rad Maintenance and �Opt/4nm 1% Capital H iahray. Rail, and 1p Regional Artcrialt 74% The Commission's salary and benefits total $7,949,400 for FY 2013/14. This represents an increase of $978,300 or 14% over the FY 2012/13 budget of $6,971,100 (Chart 4). The increase relates to the addition of four full-time equivalents (FTE); market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; a 3% cost of living adjustment to offset the employee's contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Beginning with FY 2013/14, the Commission has implemented a phased approach over a three-year period requiring employees to pay their share of normal pension costs. The current 8% employer -paid member contribution by the Commission will be eliminated in FY 2015/16. Chart 4 — Salary and Benefits Costs: Five -Year Comparison $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- 1 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 The FY 2013/14 FTE of 46 positions has increased compared to the FY 2012/13 level (Table 3) and reflects an increase of four FTEs for the recruitment of a capital projects manager, facilities administrator, human resources administrator, and a planning and programming director. The Commission is preparing for significant organization changes that include large transportation capital projects resulting in toll operations and the investment of billions of dollars requiring substantial attention at many staff levels. Management continues to be firmly committed to the intent of the Commission's enabling legislation that called for a small staff. Staff will continue to be provided the tools needed to ensure an efficient and productive work environment. However, it must be recognized that small is not viewed in an absolute context; it is relative to the required tasks to be performed and the demands to be met. Table 3 - Full -Time Equivalents by Department FY 2012-2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Executive Management 0.3 0.4 Administration 5.3 4.6 Legislative Affairs and Communications 1.9 2.0 Finance 7.0 6.6 Planning and Programming 4.8 4.8 Rail Maintenance and Operations 3.2 3.3 Public and Specialized Transit 2.5 2.4 Commuter Assistance 1.6 1.6 Motorist Assistance 1.2 1.2 Capital Project Development and Delivery 12.2 15.1 FY 13/14 TOTAL 0.3 5.5 2.4 6.9 5.3 4.0 2.4 1.8 1.2 16.2 40.0 42.0 46.0 The Commission provides a comprehensive package of benefits to all permanent, salaried employees. The package includes: health, dental, vision, and life insurance, short and long-term disability, workers' compensation, tuition assistance, sick and vacation leave, retirement benefits in the form of participation in California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS), postretirement health care, deferred compensation, and employee assistance program. The compensation components are shown in Chart 5. Chart 5 - Personnel Salary and Benefits Other Fringes 7% 11. &_ Health 13% Retirement 17% Department Initiatives Salary 63% The preparation of each department's budget was based on key assumptions, accomplishments in FY 2012/13, major initiatives for FY 2013/14, and department goals and related objectives. Following are the key initiatives and summary of expenditures for each department (Tables 4 through 13). Executive Management • Continue project development and delivery as the key Measure A priority. • Initiate construction on Riverside County's largest transportation project, the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • Advance public transit with the construction of the Perris Valley Line making this Riverside County's first major rail expansion in more than 14 years. • Advocate for state investments in transportation and approval of a federal transportation bill to fund needed transportation priorities in the County and stimulate the local economy. • Maintain regional cooperation and collaboration as a significant effort consistent with the philosophy and mission of the Commission. " E n h a n c e e x t e r n a l c o m m u n i c a t i o n s w i t h m e d i a , b u s i n e s s a n d c i v i c g r o u p s , a n d t h e c o m m u n i t y . " M a i n t a i n a n e f f e c t i v e m i d - s i z e d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a g e n c y w i t h a s m a l l a n d d e d i c a t e d s t a f f . T a b l e 4 - E x e c u t i v e M a n a g e m e n t F Y 1 1 / 1 2 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 F Y 1 3 / 1 4 D o l l a r P e r c e n t A c t u a l R e v i s e d B u d g e t P r o j e c t e d B u d g e t C h a n g e C h a n g e P e r s o n n e l $ 1 0 5 , 2 0 0 $ 1 2 0 , 6 0 0 $ 8 3 , 0 0 0 $ 9 6 , 7 0 0 $ ( 2 3 , 9 0 0 ) - 2 0 % P r o f e s s i o n a l 6 9 , 9 0 0 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 1 , 1 0 0 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 0 % S u p p o r t 3 9 , 6 0 0 5 7 , 6 0 0 5 3 , 7 0 0 5 7 , 2 0 0 ( 4 0 0 , - 1 % T O T A L $ 2 1 4 , 7 0 0 $ 2 8 3 , 2 0 0 5 2 3 7 , 8 0 0 $ 2 5 8 , 9 0 0 5 ( 2 4 , 3 0 0 ) - 9 % A d m i n i s t r a t i o n " P r o v i d e h i g h q u a l i t y s u p p o r t s e r v i c e s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t o i n t e r n a l a n d e x t e r n a l c u s t o m e r s . " C o n t i n u e t o s t r e n g t h e n t h e e l e c t r o n i c r e c o r d s m a n a g e m e n t s y s t e m . " C o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e t i m e l y c o m m u n i c a t i o n s t o C o m m i s s i o n e r s w i t h c o n t i n u e d e m p h a s i s o n t h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f e l e c t r o n i c m a i l . " C o n t i n u e t o u p d a t e t e c h n o l o g y t o s t r e a m l i n e p r o c e s s e s a n d p r o v i d e e a s i e r a c c e s s t o C o m m i s s i o n r e c o r d s . " S u p p o r t a n d d e v e l o p a m o t i v a t e d w o r k f o r c e w i t h a f r a m e w o r k o f a c t i v i t i e s a n d p r a c t i c e s t h a t c o m p l y w i t h e m p l o y m e n t l a w s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s . T a b l e 5 - A d m i n i s t r a t i o n F Y 1 1 / 1 2 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 F Y 1 3 / 1 4 D o l l a r P e r c e n t A c t u a l R e v i s e d B u d g e t P r o j e c t e d B u d g e t C h a n g e C h a n g e P e r s o n n e l $ 4 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 6 0 , 3 0 0 $ 3 9 8 , 2 0 0 $ 6 2 8 , 6 0 0 $ 1 6 8 , 3 0 0 3 7 % P r o f e s s i o n a l 2 3 9 , 0 0 0 2 6 0 , 7 0 0 1 4 1 , 0 0 0 2 0 7 , 6 0 0 ( 5 3 , 1 0 0 ) - 2 0 % S u p p o r t 5 4 7 , 7 0 0 6 4 1 , 2 0 0 6 0 1 , 8 0 0 6 4 4 , 2 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 0 % C a p i t a l O u t l a y 1 7 , 4 0 0 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 5 5 , 0 0 0 3 8 5 , 0 0 0 2 4 5 , 0 0 0 1 7 5 % D e b t S e r v i c e 2 5 , 2 0 0 - N / A T O T A L $ 1 , 2 6 3 , 3 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 2 , 2 0 0 $ 1 , 1 9 6 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 8 6 5 , 4 0 0 5 3 6 3 , 2 0 0 2 4 % L e g i s l a t i v e A f f a i r s a n d C o m m u n i c a t i o n s " C o n t i n u e e f f o r t s t o p r o t e c t a n d s e e k g r e a t e r s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l i n v e s t m e n t i n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i n f r a s t r u c t u r e a n d g o o d s m o v e m e n t . " D e v e l o p e f f e c t i v e p a r t n e r s h i p s w i t h t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o v i d e r s t o c o m m u n i c a t e a u n i f i e d m e s s a g e t o C o n g r e s s r e g a r d i n g m o b i l i t y n e e d s . " A d v o c a t e p o s i t i o n s i n t h e S t a t e L e g i s l a t u r e a n d i n C o n g r e s s t h a t a d v a n c e t h e C o u n t y ' s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i n t e r e s t s , e s p e c i a l l y t h o s e r e l a t e d t o t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t . " C o n t i n u e a l e a d e r s h i p r o l e i n f o r m u l a t i n g a c o u n t y w i d e d i r e c t i o n o n f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p o l i c i e s . " T a k e a l e a d e r s h i p r o l e o n t h e m o d e r n i z a t i o n o f C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( C E Q A ) . " C o n t i n u e t o d e v e l o p a b r o a d p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n p r o g r a m r e g a r d i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s a n d a c c o m p l i s h m e n t s t h r o u g h a v a r i e t y o f m e d i a f o r m a t s a n d p r e s e n t a t i o n o p p o r t u n i t i e s . " C o n t i n u e t o p l a c e a n e m p h a s i s o n p r o v i d i n g p r o a c t i v e p u b l i c c o m m u n i c a t i o n s s u p p o r t r e l a t e d t o m a j o r p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t e f f o r t s . " C o n d u c t a c o n c e r t e d o u t r e a c h e f f o r t t o n e w f e d e r a l a n d s t a t e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o n l o c a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i s s u e s . " P r o v i d e n e w C o m m i s s i o n e r o r i e n t a t i o n m e e t i n g s a n d o t h e r c o n t i n u i n g e d u c a t i o n o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r C o m m i s s i o n e r s . Table 6 - Legislative Affairs and Communications FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 347,100 $ 395,000 $ 351,200 $ 506,700 $ 111,700 28% Professional 425,400 661,300 456,200 552,563 (108,800) -16% Support 155,400 188,000 145,800 189,200 1,200 1% TOTAL $ 927,900 $ 1,244,300 $ 953,200 $ 1,248,400 $ 4,100 0% Finance • Continue appropriate uses of long- and short-term financing to advance 2009 Measure A projects of the Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). • Apply the sales tax revenue forecast update to develop a financing plan to support the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan and CVAG highway and regional arterial projects. • Continue to keep abreast of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) technical activities affecting the Commission's accounting and financial reporting activities and consider early implementation of new pronouncements. • Continue to strengthen the ERP system to benefit all staff in the management of accounting and project information and automation of a paperless workflow system. • Continue to implement a centralized procurements process in order to strengthen controls and ensure consistency in the application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable laws and regulations. • Conduct outreach activities to encourage disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) and small business enterprise (SBE) participation in various contracts. Table 7 - Finance FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 832,600 $ 828,600 $ 774,000 $ 840,300 $ 11,700 1% Professional 3,977,800 3,514,100 3,119,900 3,701,700 187,600 5% Support 516,500 656,800 647,600 664,700 7,900 1% Capital Outlay 7,000 5,500 6,000 6,000 N/A Transfers Out 10,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 0% TOTAL $ 15,333,900 $ 9,999,500 $ 9,547,000 $ 10,212,700 $ 213,200 2y,. Planning and Programming ■ Monitor funding authority and responsibility related to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and impacts on the STIP caused by the state budget issues. • Ensure STIP and Proposition 1B funded projects are administered and implemented consistent with California Transportation Commission (CTC) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) policies. • Continue to strategically program projects and obligate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding, including monitoring the use of such funding to prevent funds from lapsing. • Focus on interregional concerns and maintain effective working relationships involving various multi -county transportation issues, including goods movement. ■ Coordinate planning efforts with regional and local agencies relating to the development of regional transportation plans (RTP) and green house gas reduction implementation guidelines. • Secure funding through the federal transportation bill for goods movement -related needs. • Monitor and track the TUMF regional arterial projects. • Work cooperatively with member agencies to continue the work efforts on the new Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) corridors. • Continue the Congestion Management Program (CMP) update and traffic monitoring along urban and rural highway systems. " A d m i n i s t e r t h e S B 8 2 1 B i c y c l e a n d P e d e s t r i a n F a c i l i t i e s P r o g r a m . " M o n i t o r t h e P o r t o f L o s A n g e l e s a n d P o r t o f L o n g B e a c h ' s ( P o r t s ) p r o j e c t s f o r i m p a c t s o n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . T a b l e 8 - P l a n n i n g a n d P r o g r a m m i n g P e r s o n n e l P r o f e s s i o n a l S u p p o r t P r o j e c t s a n d O p e r a t i o n s C a p i t a l O u t l a y T O T A L F Y 1 1 / 1 2 A c t u a l $ 9 0 4 , 8 0 0 1 3 2 , 9 0 0 1 7 , 4 0 0 2 , 3 2 3 , 6 0 0 2 1 , 2 0 0 S 3 , 3 9 9 , 9 0 0 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 R e v i s e d B u d g e t $ 8 3 5 , 8 0 0 3 6 2 , 8 0 0 2 4 , 3 0 0 3 , 7 7 1 , 2 0 0 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 P r o j e c t e d $ 9 5 9 , 2 0 0 $ 1 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 4 0 0 2 , 3 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 9 9 4 , 1 0 0 $ 3 , 5 3 8 , 6 0 0 $ F Y 1 3 / 1 4 B u d g e t 1 , 0 3 2 , 7 0 0 4 8 7 , 5 0 0 2 3 , 3 0 0 4 , 3 0 1 , 5 0 0 D o l l a r P e r c e n t C h a n g e C h a n g e $ 1 9 6 , 9 0 0 2 4 % 1 2 4 , 7 0 0 3 4 % ( 1 , 0 0 0 ) - 4 % 5 3 0 , 3 0 0 1 4 % N / A 5 , 8 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 8 5 0 , 9 0 0 1 7 % R a i l M a i n t e n a n c e a n d O p e r a t i o n s " C o n t i n u e a c t i v e p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n g o v e r n a n c e a n d o p e r a t i o n s o f t h e M e t r o l i n k c o m m u t e r r a i l s y s t e m . " C o n t i n u e t h e p l a n n i n g a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f c a p i t a l i m p r o v e m e n t s a t t h e c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , i n c l u d i n g t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e , s e c u r i t y a n d r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s , a n d p a r k i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . " C o n t i n u e t o s u p p o r t a c t i v i t i e s r e l a t e d t o t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e p r o j e c t a n d e v a l u a t e i t s o p e r a t i o n a l i m p a c t . " E s t a b l i s h b e s t a p p r o a c h t o b u i l d , m a i n t a i n , a n d o p e r a t e c o s t e f f e c t i v e a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y s u s t a i n a b l e f a c i l i t i e s t h a t m e e t t h e p u b l i c ' s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n n e e d s . " C o n t i n u e c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h C V A G , A m t r a k a n d t h e S t a t e t o f o c u s a t t e n t i o n o n t h e c r e a t i o n o f i n t e r c i t y p a s s e n g e r r a i l s e r v i c e b e t w e e n C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y , t h e P a s s A r e a , R i v e r s i d e , a n d t h e L o s A n g e l e s b a s i n . T a b l e 9 - R a i l M a i n t e n a n c e a n d O p e r a t i o n s F Y 1 1 / 1 2 A c t u a l P e r s o n n e l $ 4 8 8 , 7 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l 2 0 6 , 0 0 0 S u p p o r t 1 , 2 6 0 , 1 0 0 P r o j e c t s a n d O p e r a t i o n s 1 8 , 2 2 5 , 9 0 0 C a p i t a l O u t l a y 2 1 , 9 0 0 T O T A L S 2 0 , 2 0 2 , 6 0 0 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 F Y 1 2 / 1 3 R e v i s e d B u d g e t P r o j e c t e d $ 4 9 6 , 7 0 0 $ 6 1 3 , 2 0 0 $ 4 2 1 , 0 0 0 2 5 6 , 9 0 0 1 , 7 3 5 , 6 0 0 1 , 4 5 5 , 9 0 0 1 1 , 8 3 4 , 3 0 0 9 , 1 8 1 , 9 0 0 6 5 , 7 0 0 5 6 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 5 5 3 , 3 0 0 $ 1 1 , 5 6 4 , 3 0 0 $ F Y 1 3 / 1 4 B u d g e t 6 3 6 , 5 0 0 $ 5 8 8 , 0 0 0 1 , 7 2 3 , 7 0 0 1 2 , 4 8 9 , 2 0 0 4 8 , 2 0 0 1 5 , 4 8 5 , 6 0 0 $ D o l l a r P e r c e n t C h a n g e C h a n g e 1 3 9 , 8 0 0 2 8 % 1 6 7 , 0 0 0 4 0 % ( 1 1 , 9 0 0 ) - 1 % 6 5 4 , 9 0 0 6 % ( 1 7 , 5 0 0 ) - 2 7 % 9 3 2 , 3 0 0 6 % P u b l i c a n d S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t �% S u p p o r t i n n o v a t i v e p r o g r a m s t h a t p r o v i d e t r a n s i t a s s i s t a n c e i n h a r d t o s e r v e r u r a l a r e a s o r f o r r i d e r s h a v i n g v e r y s p e c i a l t r a n s i t n e e d s a n d m o n i t o r f u n d i n g o f t h e s e p r o g r a m s . " C o m p l e t e t h e s e c o n d y e a r o f s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t f u n d i n g a l l o c a t i o n s r e l a t e d t o t h e 2 0 1 1 u n i v e r s a l c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s a n d c o n t i n u e t o m o n i t o r p e r f o r m a n c e . " C o n t i n u e l o n g - r a n g e p l a n n i n g a c t i v i t i e s t o e n s u r e t h a t a n t i c i p a t e d r e v e n u e s a r e i n l i n e w i t h p r o j e c t e d l e v e l s o f s e r v i c e b y t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s . " M o n i t o r p u b l i c a n d s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s ' p e r f o r m a n c e t h r o u g h t h e T r a n s T r a c k p r o g r a m . " P r o v i d e a v a i l a b i l i t y f o r l o c a l m a t c h i n g f u n d s t o W e s t e r n C o u n t y a p p l i c a n t s s e e k i n g F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 f e d e r a l c a p i t a l g r a n t s . �% C o o r d i n a t e w i t h o p e r a t o r s o n m a j o r c a p i t a l p u r c h a s e s a n d i n v e s t m e n t s i n t o n e w r o l l i n g s t o c k a n d o t h e r s y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t s i n o r d e r t o m a i n t a i n a v i a b l e o n - h a n d r e s e r v e . Table 10 - Public and Specialized Transit FY 11/12 Actual Personnel $ 326,600 Professional 146,100 Support 8,400 Projects and Operations 52,677,000 Transfers Out 14,910,500 TOTAL $ 68,068,600 Commuter Assistance FY 12/13 Revised Budget $ 326,200 291,500 18,900 84,174,600 19,632,600 $ 104,443,800 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget $ 296,100 $ 380,100 $ 274,600 188,500 13,500 24,500 58,822, 300 106,210,800 18,336,400 13,966,100 $ 77,742,900 $ 120,770,000 $ Dollar Change 53,900 (103,000) 5,600 22,036,200 (5,666,500) 16,326,200 Percenk Change 17% -35% 30% -29% 16% ■ Improve the suite of services and outreach to rideshare participants and employer partners, including personalized information and electronic access and distribution. ■ Maintain and grow employer partnerships through value-added services and tools for ridesharing programs. • Maintain and operate a four -county ridematching database system with partner agencies. • Maintain long-term partnership with San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to manage and implement a "sister" Commuter Assistance program for residents and employers in San Bernardino County. ■ Optimize park and ride facilities to support car/vanpool/buspool arrangements and facilitate transit connections. Table 11- Commuter Assistance Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Transfers Out TOTAL FY 11/12 Actual $ 216,000 $ 588,000 366,900 1,986,700 160,000 $ 3,317,600 $ FY 12/13 Revised Budget 218,900 650,300 529,200 2,623,400 17,000 151,300 4,190,100 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change $ 375,200 $ 300,800 $ 81,900 37% 754,800 817,800 167,500 26% 469,100 483,300 (45,900) -9% 2,588,300 2,802,800 179,400 7% 10,000 7,000 (10,000) -59% 151,300 112,200 139,1001 -26% $ 4,348,700 $ 4,523,900 $ 333,800 8% Motorist Assistance • Assess opportunities for efficiency related to the call box program operations. • Maintain a high benefit -to -cost ratio related to the performance of the FSP program. • Operate and maintain the 1E511 system in accordance with national 511 implementation standards in partnership with SANBAG. • Enhance the 1E511 with more personalized traffic information services. • Utilize the opportunity to enhance coordination between California Highway Patrol (CHP) and Caltrans on traveler information. Table 12 - Motorist Assistance Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 149,200 $ 175,900 $ 175,900 $ 187,200 $ 11,300 6% 789,600 717,500 736,500 766,500 49,000 7% 515,400 884,600 880,200 875,900 (8,700) -1% 2,392,100 3,070,000 2,935,000 3,635,000 565,000 18% 1,096,600 1,321,300 1,321,300 1,290,900 (30,400) -2% $ 4,942,900 $ 6,169,300 $ 6,048,900 $ 6,755,500 $ 586,200 10% Capital Project Development and Delivery • Continue project development, right of way, and construction activities on remaining 1989 Measure A projects including SR-74 curve widening, SR-91 high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange, and 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors. • Continue project activities on the 1-215 bi-county highway and Perris Valley Line rail projects, which were included in both the 1989 Measure A and 2009 Measure A programs. • Continue project work on the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan projects, including the 91/71 connectors; the SR-91, 1-15, and 1-215 corridor mobility improvement projects; SR-79 realignment; and Mid County Parkway. • Provide Western County Measure A regional arterial TUMF funding and support to local jurisdictions for regional arterial project engineering, right of way acquisition, and construction. • Provide 2009 Measure A funding to the incorporated cities, CVAG and the County for local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction. • Provide advance funding and support of 2009 Measure A highway and regional arterial projects. • Develop strategies to implement alternative financing structures including public toll roads. • Maintain a right of way acquisition and management program in support of capital projects. • Manage right of way acquisition in the most cost effective manner and within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. • Maintain and manage the access, use, safety, and security of Commission -owned properties including commuter rail stations, properties in acquisition process, and income -generating properties. Table 13 — Capital Project Development and Delivery FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 2,268,400 $ 3,113,100 $ 2,934,200 $ 3,339,800 $ 226,700 7% Professional 5,057,500 7,692,500 7,321,700 19,260,400 11,567,900 150% Support 300,700 597,100 302,900 907,300 310,200 52% Projects and Operations 173,405,700 365,850,100 242,066,500 726,987,200 361,137,100 99% Capital Outlay 142,200 225,000 78,300 350,000 125,000 56% Debt Service 61,507,400 143,413,000 22,990,600 135,712,300 (7,700,700) -5% Transfers Out 97,810,100 302,013,400 100,727,100 615,956,600 313,943,200 104% TOTAL $ 340,492,000 $ 822,904,200 $ 376,421,300 $ 1,502,513,600 $ 679,609,400 83% Fund Balances The total fund balance as of June 30, 2013 is projected at $590,821,600. The Commission's budgeted activities for FY 2013/14 are expected to result in a $252,508,400 increase of total fund balance at June 30, 2014 to $843,330,000. The primary cause of the increase is related to the completion of financing activities in FY 2013/14 related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Table 14 presents the components of fund balance by governmental fund type and program at June 30, 2014. Table 14 — Projected Fund Balances by Governmental Fund Type and Program at June 30, 2014 General Fund $8,091,200 Riverside Co unty Transportation Commission $643,330,000 Special Revenue Funds 5413,294,200 Capital Projects Funds $274.420.100 Deist Se re ice Fund $1.47,521,509 Management Services $4,337,400 Measure A Western County: Planning and Programming 1,465,100 Bond Financing $4,671,500 Rail Maintenance and Operations 2,288,700 Commuter Assistance 13,476,600 Economic Development 3,737,800 Highways 103,827,000 Local Streets and Roads 1,100 New Corridors 54,310,400 Public and Specialized Transit 7,821,000 Rail 37,740,500 Regional Arterials 23,836,900 Measure A Coachella Valley: Highways and Regional Arterial 4,286,800 Local Streets and Roads 1,600 Specialized Transit 1,361,200 Measure A Palo Verde Valley Local Streets and Roads 600 Motorist Assistance 5,221,100 State Transit Assistance 42,788,800 Local Transportation Fund 86,030,100 TUMF: CETAP 17,040,200 Regional Arterials 7,141,000 Budget Summary Highways $ 274,420,100 The overall budget for FY 2013/14 is presented in Table 15 by summarized line items, Table 16 by operating and capital classifications, and Table 17 by governmental fund type. Highway, rail, and regional arterial program expenditures by project are summarized in Table 18. Table 15 — Budget Comparative by Summarized Line Item FY 2012-2014 Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations- General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE FY 11/12 Actual 134, 984, 300 66,556,700 13,487,500 28,097,000 21,411,300 2,0013,600 8,116,400 1,430,100 4,308,300 280,400,200 6,072,600 11,632,200 3.728.100 15,360,300 11,194,200 21,366,500 27,451,200 16,285,700 53, 728,100 71,658,200 236,500 40,127,900 8.962.700 FY 12/13 Revised Budget 141,000,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 73,151,900 17,917,800 2,688,700 7,557,300 882,800 7,265,900 334,176,900 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget $ 141,000,000 $ 147,000,000 69,500,000 72,500,000 14, 212, 500 13, 298, 000 40,949,200 94,389,003 21, 306, 500 133, 496, 300 2,589,400 2,954,400 7,268,200 6,723,400 493,500 500,000 3,986,300 4,026,500 301,305,600 474,8/37,600 6,971,100 6,960,200 7,949,400 14,676,700 5.333.300 20,010,000 18,880,500 27,932,000 125,994,100 29,050,000 112,246,800 97,835,800 800,000 42,129,000 16,455,400 13,360,700 26,675,500 4.586.900 5.593.300 17,947,600 32,268,800 14,255,600 20,107,100 16,580,400 20,360,030 61,628,000 240,968,403 29,050,000 217,750,000 64, 716, 400 164, 707, 800 68, 779, 200 122, 610, 800 320,000 939,000 42,129,000 43,825,900 20.500.400 25,157,500 Dollar Percent Change Change $ 6,000,003 4% 3,000,000 4% (914,500) -6% 21,237,100 29% 115,578,500 645% 265,700 10% (833,900) -11% (382,800) -43% (3,239,400) -45% 140,710,700 42% 978,300 i 11,998,800 260,000 12,258,803 82% 5% 61% 1,226,600 6% (7,572,000) -27% 114,974,300 91% 188,700,000 650% 52,461,000 47% 24,775,000 25% 139,000 17% 1,696,900 4% 8.702.100 53% 251,011,000 471,323,600 317,959,000 856,426,503 385,102,900 82% 46,523,900 126,800,000 15, 008, 700 16, 613, 000 61,532,600 209,700 334,186.200 143,413,000 447,700 642,165,400 6,800,000 87,100,000 16,190,600 41,112,300 7,500,000 22,990,600 205,200 366,062,600 135,712,300 796,200 1,033,153,200 (39,700,000) 24,499,300 7.500,000 (7,700,700) 348,500 390,987,800 -31% 147% N/A -5% 78% 61% (53,786,000) (307,988,500) (64,757,000) (558,265,600) (250,277,100) 81% 123, 977, 200 (123,977,200) 40,000,000 328,118,600 (328,118,600) 1,220,172,000 125,536,100 636,325,800 308,207,200 94% (125,536,100) (636,325,800) (308,207,200) 94% 80,000,000 700,774,030 (519,398,000) -43% 110.000.003 110.000.000 N/A 40.000,000 1,220,172,000 80,000,000 810,774,000 (409,398,000) -34% (13,786,000) 912,183,500 15,243,000 252,508,400 (659,675,100) -72% 589,364.600 575,578,600 575,578,600 590,821.600 15,243,000 3% $ 575.578,600 $ 1,487,762,100 $ 590,821,600 $ 843,330,000 $ 5644,432,100) -43% Table 16 - Operating and Capital Budget FY 2013/14 Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way and Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) FY 13/14 Operating Budget $ 14,018,000 72, 500, 000 13, 298, 000 751,400 5,299,000 2,498,400 410,900 108, 775, 700 4,600,400 4,716,900 4,664,000 FY 13/14 Capital Budget $ 132,982,000 93, 637, 600 128,197,300 456,000 6,723,400 500,000 3,615,600 366,111, 900 3,349,000 21, 958, 600 929,300 FY 13/14 TOTAL Budget $ 147,000,000 72, 500,000 13,298,000 94,389,000 133,496,300 2,954,400 6,723,400 500,000 4,026,500 474,887,600 7,949,400 26,675,500 5,593,300 9,380,900 7,909,500 5,000 120,610,800 914,000 22, 887,900 12,197, 600 20,355,000 240,968,400 217, 750, 000 164, 707,800 2,000,000 25,000 43,825,900 25,157, 500 32, 268,800 20,107,100 20,360,000 240,968,400 217,750,000 164,707,800 122,610,800 939,000 43,825,900 25,157,500 129,439,300 726, 987, 200 87,100, 000 41,112, 300 7,500,000 856,426,500 87,100,000 41,112, 300 7,500,000 446,200 135, 712, 300 350,000 135,712,300 796,200 143, 866, 800 889, 286,400 1,033,153, 200 (35,091,100) 16, 846, 600 (15, 369, 200) (523,174, 500) 619,479, 200 (620, 956, 600) 700, 774, 000 110, 000, 000 (558, 265,600) 636,325,800 (636,325,800) 700,774,000 110,000,000 1,477,400 809, 296,600 810,774,000 (33,613,700) 286,122,100 252,508,400 Beginning Fund Balance 198,403,700 392,417,900 590.821,600 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 164 790,000 $ 678,540,000 $ 843,330,000 Table 17 — Budget by Governmental Fund Type FY 2013/14 FY 13/14 General Fund Special Revenue Capital Projects Debt Service TOTAL Budget Revenues Measure A Sales Tax $ 2,800,000 $ 144,200,000 $ - $ $ 147,000,000 LTF Sales Tax - 72,500,000 72,500,000 STASales Tax 13,298,000 - 13,298,000 Federal Reimbursements 25,000 91,620,000 2,744,000 94,389,000 State Reimbursements 1,119,000 132,377,300 - 133,496,300 Local Reimbursements 224,800 2,729,600 - 2,954,400 TUMF Revenue 6,723,400 - 6,723,400 Other Revenue - 500,000 - 500,030 Investment Income 20,200 1,030,400 1,877,700 1,098,200 4,026,500 TOTAL Revenues 4,189,000 464,978,700 1,877,700 3,842,200 474,887,600 Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits 3,991,700 3,957,700 - 7,949,400 Professional and Support Professional Services 3,024,100 21,615,000 1,248,100 788,300 26,675,500 Support Costs 3,292,700 2,300,600 5,593,300 TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 6,316,800 23,915,600 1,248,100 788,300 32,268,800 Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 1,471,700 18,635,400 20,107,100 Engineering 5,000 20,355,000 20,360,003 Construction 240,968,400 240,963,400 Design Build 217,750,000 217,750,000 Right of Way/Land 164,707,800 164,707,800 Operating and Capital Disbursements 14,4)0,000 108,210,800 122,610,800 Special Studies 914,000 25,000 939,000 Local Streets and Roads - 43,825,900 43,825,900 Regional Arterials - 25,157,500 25,157,503 TOTAL Projects and Operations 16,790,700 839,635,800 - 856,426,500 Debt Service Principal Payments 80,000,000 7,100,000 87,100,000 Interest Payments 100,000 41,012,300 41,112,300 Cost of Issuance 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 TOTAL Debt Service - 87,600,000 48,112,300 135,712,300 Capital Outlay 439,200 357,000 - 796,200 TOTAL Expenditures 27,538,400 867,866,100 88,848,100 48,900,600 1,033,153,200 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (23,349,400) (402,887,400) (86,970,400) (45,058,4430) (558,265,600) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 14,896,600 387,406,200 80,000,000 154,023,000 636,325,800 Transfers Out (66,075,200) (560,250,600) (10,000,000) (636,325,800) Debt Proceeds 700,774,000 - 700,774,000 TIFIA Loan Proceeds - 110,000,000 - 110,000,000 Net Financing Sources (Uses) 14,896,600 321,331,000 330,522,400 14,3,023,000 810,774,00) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) (8,452,800) (81,556,400) 243,553,000 98,964,600 252,508,400 Beginning Fund Balance 16,544,000 494,850,600 30,1367,100 48,559, 900 590,821,600 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 8,091,200 $ 413,294,200 $ 274,420 100 $ 147,524,500 $ 843,330,000 Table 18 — Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs FY 2013/14 Description Projects and operations Bechtel program management $ 9,200,000 SCRRA program management 1,200,000 Other 1,797,600 TOTAL PROJECTS -GENERAL $ 12,197,600 Highway engineering 91/71 interchange improvement project $ 4,600,000 1-15 corridor improvements 7,000,000 1-215 corridor improvement southbound connector 950,000 Mid County Parkway 2,550,000 SR-91 corridor improvements 1.00,000 SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange 32,000 General _ 1.00,000 SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY ENGINEERING 15,332,000 Regional arterial engineering Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including SR-79 realignment Rail engineering CCTV operations center General SUBTOTAL RAIL ENGINEERING TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL ENGINEERING 4,823,000 200,000 5.000 205,000 20.360.000 Highway construction 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors $ 1,055,000 74/215interchange 750,000 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road 45,500,000 1-215 corridor improvements (south widening segment)/I-15 to Scott Road 1,700,000 I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening 2,057,300 1-15/Los Alamos Road bridge replacement 900,000 SR-74curve widening 3,410,000 SR-91 corridor improvements 3,800,000 SR-91/La Sierra Avenue interchange 33,000 SR-91 HOV lanes/Mary Street to 7th Street 150,000 SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION 59,355,300 Regional arterial construction Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including SR-79 widening/Thompson to Domenigoni Various Western County Measure A regional arterial projects SUBTOTAL REGIONAL ARTERIAL CONSTRUCTION 41,484,100 2,300,000 43,784,100 Rail construction Riverside station pedestrian improvements 1,152,000 CCTV operations center 1,150,000 Station rehabilitation 2,2613,000 Perris Valley Line and other rail projects 133,197,000 North Main Corona station parking structure 20,000 Perris Multimodal Facility 50,000 SUBTOTAL RAIL CONSTRUCTION 137,829,000 TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAILCONSTRUCTION $ 240,968,400 Highway design build SR-91 corridor improvements TOTAL HIGHWAY DESIGN BUILD $ 217,750,000 $ 217,750,000 Highway right of way and land 74/215 interchange $ 30,000 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors 274,000 1-215 corridor improvement (central segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road 730,000 Mid County Parkway 6,182,000 SR-74curve widening 310,000 SR-74/1-15 to 7th Street 30,000 91/71 interchange improvement project 3,335,000 SR-91 corridor improvements 135,310,000 SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange 11,444,000 Western County Multi -species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) 3,000,000 General 20,000 SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND 160,665,000 Regional arterial right of way and land Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects 3,545,800 Rail right of way and land Perris Multimodal Facility 10,000 Perris Valley Line and other rail projects 427,000 General 60,000 SUBTOTAL RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND 497,000 TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND $ 164,707,800 GRAND TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL PROGRAMS $ 655,983,800 Gann Appropriations limit In November 1979, the voters of the State approved Proposition 4, commonly known as the Gann Initiative. The Proposition created Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, placing limits on the amount of revenue that can be spent by public agencies from the "proceeds of taxes." In 1980, the State Legislature added Section 7910 to the Government Code, providing that the governing body of each local jurisdiction must establish, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the following year. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year is equal to the previous year's limit adjusted for population changes and changes in the California per capita income. The Commission is subject to the requirements of Article XIIIB. Gann appropriations limits are calculated for and applied to the Commission. In accordance with the requirements of Article XIIIB implementing legislation, the Board approved Resolution No. 13-009 on June 12, 2013, establishing appropriations limits for the Commission at $370,426,988. The FY 2013/14 budget appropriated $190,640,700 in taxes for the Commission, falling well within the limits set by the Gann Initiative. Based on historic trends and future projections, it appears the Commission's use of the proceeds of taxes, as defined by Article XIIIB, will continue to fall below the appropriations limit. The calculation for the FY 2013/14 appropriations limit is as follows: 2012-2013 Appropriations Limit $ 348,861,382 2013-2014 adjustment: Change in California per capita personal income Change in Population, Riverside County 5.12% 1.01% Per Capital Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 5.12 + 100 = 1.0512 100 Population converted to a ratio: 1.01 + 100 = 1.0101 100 Calculation of factor for FY 2013-2014: 1.0512 x 1.0101 = 1.06181712 $348,861,382 X 1.06181712 = $370,426,988 2013-2014 Appropriations Limit $370,426,988 Source: California per capita income — California Department of Finance Population, Riverside County — California Department of Finance Rivnrside County tronsportotion Commission tttlitm 1 u PAltbt Commission Policy Goals and Objectives In addition to financial and administration policies, the Commission has seven long-term policy goals: promote mobility, mitigate and address the impact of goods movement, encourage economic development, ensure improved system efficiencies, foster environmental stewardship, support transportation choices through intermodalism and accessibility, and prioritize public and agency communications. For each of these policy goals, the objectives and initiatives that were considered in the framework of the work plan for the FY 2013/14 budget are identified below. While Riverside County shows modest signs of economic recovery, the Commission remains cautious about revenue availability. The need for better transportation remains a top public priority, and the Commission is poised to address this challenge via the seven policy goals. In moving forward with an aggressive program of projects and services, the Commission will face fluctuating Measure A, TUMF, and TDA revenues and uncertainty regarding the availability of federal and state transportation revenues. Due to the long-term nature of many of the Commission's programs, many of the policy goals' objectives and initiatives are ongoing from year to year. Promote Mobility The Commission, in cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies, will strive to create a transportation system that promotes efficient mobility both within the County and region. • Continue to aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, and construction processes on key components of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan, which includes the SR-91, 1-15, and 1-215 corridor improvement projects. • Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice by: o Continuing property acquisition and commencing construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project through Corona, which includes the extension of tolled express lanes (91 Express Lanes) into Riverside County; and o Continuing to develop a tolled express lane system on 1-15 between SR-60 and Cajalco Road. • Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley, including CVAG and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities. • Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A and determine use(s) for any unexpended revenues. • Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the Mid County Parkway and SR- 79 realignment projects. • Continue to work with state and federal agencies to fund and construct projects programmed in the STIP, Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), Proposition 16 bond programs, and Measure A program as well as other high priority regional projects. • Maximize obtaining all available transportation funds and strategically program funds to meet funding deadlines and to prevent the lapse and loss of funds. • Leverage the effective application and use of Measure A Western County regional arterial and other state and federal funds to deliver eligible regional arterial projects. • Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the TUMF Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in Western County. • Actively participate in the 5R-91 Advisory Committee to facilitate near and long-term improvements to SR-91, enhance intercounty public transit options, and foster mobility improvements between the two counties. • Advocate streamlining efforts at the state and federal levels that will reduce costs, time, and delays currently associated with project delivery including, but not limited to, timely project reviews and approvals. • Continue to coordinate and provide public access to commuter information via the 1E511 system and focus commuter assistance and 1E511 outreach efforts under one brand. • Continue cooperation with the FTA regarding the Small Starts process to support the initiation of the Perris Valley Line commuter rail service in 2015. " C o n t i n u e t o w o r k w i t h t h e p u b l i c t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s t o c o n t r o l c o s t s a n d i n c r e a s e s y s t e m e f f i c i e n c i e s i n o r d e r t o a c c o m m o d a t e f l u c t u a t i n g r e v e n u e s f r o m l o c a l , s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l s o u r c e s . " C o n t i n u e t o d e v e l o p t r a n s i t s e r v i c e t o f u r t h e r p r o m o t e s e a m l e s s i n t r a c i t y , i n t e r c i t y , a n d r e g i o n a l t r a n s i t c o n n e c t i v i t y f o r C o u n t y r e s i d e n t s . M i t i g a t e a n d A d d r e s s t h e I m p a c t o f G o o d s M o v e m e n t T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l w o r k w i t h f e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t s t o f a c i l i t a t e t h e m o v e m e n t o f g o o d s a n d s e r v i c e s t o , w i t h i n , a n d t h r o u g h t h e C o u n t y , r e c o g n i z i n g t h e v i t a l r o l e g o o d s m o v e m e n t m o b i l i t y p l a y s i n t h e e c o n o m i c h e a l t h o f t h e C o u n t y , t h e S t a t e , a n d t h e n a t i o n . " S e e k f u n d i n g a n d l o c a l a g e n c y c o n c u r r e n c e t o i m p l e m e n t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a p p r o v e d , h i g h - p r i o r i t y r a i l r o a d g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n l i s t t o m i t i g a t e t h e i m p a c t o f i n c r e a s e d g o o d s m o v e m e n t d e m a n d s o n t h e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s y s t e m . " E n c o u r a g e C o n g r e s s t o c r e a t e a f e d e r a l f r e i g h t t r u s t f u n d , o r s i m i l a r p r o g r a m w i t h a d e d i c a t e d a n d f i r e w a l l e d r e v e n u e s t r u c t u r e , i n o r d e r t o t r e a t t h e n a t i o n ' s m u l t i m o d a l n a t i o n a l g o o d s m o v e m e n t n e t w o r k a s a s y s t e m r a t h e r t h a n i n d i v i d u a l p r o j e c t s . " R e m a i n c o m m i t t e d t o a r e g i o n a l a p p r o a c h r e g a r d i n g g o o d s m o v e m e n t i s s u e s i n o r d e r t o m a x i m i z e f u n d i n g f r o m s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l s o u r c e s t o g o o d s m o v e m e n t n e e d s i n S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . " C o n t i n u e w o r k i n g w i t h t h e P o r t s a n d r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n s t o d e v e l o p a f u n d i n g m e c h a n i s m f o r n e e d e d p r o j e c t s a n d m i t i g a t i o n o n a r e g i o n a l b a s i s . E n c o u r a g e E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t T r a n s p o r t a t i o n d e c i s i o n s w i l l c o n s i d e r t h e e c o n o m i c b e n e f i t s d e r i v e d f r o m a n y i m p r o v e m e n t , a n d , w h e r e f e a s i b l e a n d p r a c t i c a l , w i l l p u r s u e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a l t e r n a t i v e s t h a t e n h a n c e o r c o m p l e m e n t e c o n o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t . " C o m m i t t o s e e k o p p o r t u n i t i e s r e l a t e d t o t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s t h a t w i l l c r e a t e j o b s a n d i m p r o v e t h e e c o n o m i c b a s e i n t h e C o u n t y . " S u p p o r t l o c a l a g e n c i e s i n t h e d e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f i n t e r c h a n g e s t h a t a r e i n p r o x i m i t y t o r e g i o n a l e c o n o m i c c e n t e r s a n d d e v e l o p m e n t s . " S u p p o r t l o c a l p r o j e c t s , c o n s i s t e n t w i t h c o u n t y w i d e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n g o a l s , w h i c h e n h a n c e b u s i n e s s d e v e l o p m e n t , l o c a l e m p l o y m e n t , a n d a r e a t o u r i s m . E n s u r e I m p r o v e d S y s t e m E f f i c i e n c i e s T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l s e l e c t p r o j e c t s a n d a l l o c a t e f u n d s i n a m a n n e r t h a t w i l l i m p r o v e s a f e t y a n d r e d u c e c o n g e s t e d t r a f f i c c o r r i d o r s . " A d v o c a t e t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d u s e o f a d v a n c e d t e c h n o l o g i e s f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a p p l i c a t i o n s t h a t a r e a f f o r d a b l e a n d p r a c t i c a l . " I n p a r t n e r s h i p w i t h S A N B A G , i m p l e m e n t e n h a n c e m e n t s t o t h e 1 E 5 1 1 m o b i l e a p p l i c a t i o n f o r i m p r o v e d d e p l o y m e n t o f r e a l - t i m e t r a f f i c i n f o r m a t i o n , r e a l - t i m e b u s a n d r a i l t r a n s i t t r i p p l a n n i n g i n f o r m a t i o n , a n d r i d e s h a r e i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e t o c o m m u t e r s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f t r i p p l a n n i n g a n d r e d u c i n g c o n g e s t i o n . " A s s u r e t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s o f t r a n s i t p l a n n i n g t h r o u g h c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h t h e C o u n t y ' s e i g h t t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s , C i t i z e n s ' A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e , a n d a n n u a l S R T P p r o c e s s w i t h a g o a l t o w a r d p r o m o t i n g p r o g r a m p r o d u c t i v i t y , e f f i c i e n c y , a n d e f f e c t i v e n e s s . " P r o v i d e i n n o v a t i v e c o m m u t e r r i d e s h a r e p r o g r a m s t o r e d u c e s i n g l e o c c u p a n t v e h i c l e t r i p s a n d c o o r d i n a t e w i t h o t h e r r e g i o n a l r i d e s h a r e s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s t o a d d r e s s i n t e r c o u n t y c o m m u t e t r i p s . " W o r k w i t h l o c a l j u r i s d i c t i o n s , C a l t r a n s , a n d t h e C H P t o c o n t i n u e e f f i c i e n t d e l i v e r y o f a c o m p r e h e n s i v e m o t o r i s t a i d s y s t e m w h i c h i n c l u d e s a n 1 E 5 1 1 t r a v e l e r i n f o r m a t i o n s e r v i c e , a c a l l b o x p r o g r a m , a n d a F S P p r o g r a m , i n c l u d i n g t e m p o r a r y s e r v i c e s i n f r e e w a y c o n s t r u c t i o n z o n e s . " L e v e r a g e r e s o u r c e s t o i n c o r p o r a t e p a r k a n d r i d e f a c i l i t i e s a n d a d d i t i o n a l c o n n e c t i n g b u s s e r v i c e a t M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n s t h a t m a y h a v e a v a i l a b l e c a p a c i t y . " C o n t i n u e w o r k i n g w i t h C a l t r a n s t o m o n i t o r t r a f f i c c o n d i t i o n s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f f o c u s i n g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies. • Work with Caltrans and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of the highways and regional arterials. • Support the implementation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that provide non -motorized transportation alternatives. Foster Environmental Stewardship The Commission will achieve its mobility goals while promoting environmental stewardship and protecting the area's natural resources and quality of life. • Continue working with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), Caltrans, and state/federal resource agencies to implement the MSHCP. • Work with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), sub -regional agencies, and local jurisdictions to implement the current RTP and sustainable communities' strategy that meets regional air quality goals, conformity guidelines, and SB375 green house reduction targets for the SCAG region. • Support a variety of outreach channels and educational programs that promote the benefits of ridesharing, public and specialized transit, rail, and availability of commuter resources for the purposes of reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. • Facilitate private/public use of clean fuels technology. • Continue to develop sustainable and green commuter rail stations and provide upgrades and rehabilitation projects to reduce the environmental impact of the existing stations. Support Transportation Choices through Intermodalism and Accessibility County residents will be served, where economically feasible, through the development of transportation alternatives and travel options that consider the needs of a wide range of citizens. • Work with transit providers and local social service agencies to provide specialized transit service to meet a broad spectrum of socio-economic transit needs of seniors, persons with disabilities, and low income residents. • Leverage commuter and motorist assistance outreach channels in order to increase the awareness and use of alternative commuting modes. • Implement the Commission's commuter rail SRTP and Southern California Regional Rail Authority's (SCRRA or Metrolink) plan for commuter rail services with an emphasis on the Perris Valley Line, an extension from Riverside to Perris via Moreno Valley. • Advocate for the provision of Amtrak commuter and/or passenger rail services to the Pass Area and the Coachella Valley. • Continue to pursue the goals and objectives as outlined in the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) for Riverside County related to a unified, comprehensive but flexible strategy for transportation service delivery to address transportation gaps and/or barriers focusing on unmet transportation needs of elderly individuals, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited income. • Enhance security, surveillance, and emergency response capabilities of County transit facilities and roadway infrastructure through proactive planning, interagency coordination, and investment. Prioritize Public and Agency Communications The Commission will provide timely, informative, and accurate information to encourage informed public and agency participation in the Commission's decision -making processes. • Promote a close working relationship with news and civic entities to increase interest and understanding of transportation and related issues. • Enhance the provision of public information through various forms of communication (e.g., website, annual report, monthly newsletter, television, Speakers Bureau, print media, radio, etc.). • Maintain an ongoing effort of informing Riverside County's Congressional and State Legislative delegations regarding County transportation issues. • Develop an effective long-range legislative strategy regarding federal transportation bill funding and federal agency practices to ensure that the federal government participates as a full partner in funding Riverside County projects that are of national and regional significance. • Protect and enhance flexibility in the Commission's use of state and federal transportation revenue in addressing regional priorities and needs. • Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality -of -life needs for Riverside County. • Advocate for sufficient funding for Riverside County transit and transportation projects from various federal and state revenue sources including, but not limited to, annual federal appropriations, economic recovery programs, STIP, and Proposition 1B bond programs. • Seek legislative flexibility for innovative financing and delivery methods. • Maintain ongoing efforts to educate commuters, businesses, and the public regarding the Commission's toll planning efforts and specific project development efforts currently underway. Financial and Administration Policies Financial Planning Policies • Administrative costs, including salaries and benefits, shall be funded by allocations from Measure A, LTF, FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds. • The Commission shall budget no more than one percent (1%) of Measure A sales tax revenues for administrative salaries and benefits. • Administrative program delivery costs will be budgeted at whatever is reasonable and necessary, but not to exceed four percent (4%) of Measure A sales tax revenues (inclusive of the one -percent salary limitation). The Commission shall budget 100% of the annual required contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. • The Commission shall utilize unexpended 1989 Measure A funds only for projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A. Sales tax revenues from the 2009 Measure A shall be expended only for projects and programs included in the 2009 Measure A. • Amounts will be budgeted by fiscal year for multi -year projects, based on best available estimates, with the understanding that, to the extent actuals vary from those estimates and the project is ongoing, adjustments will be made on a continual basis. • The fiscal capital budget should be consistent with the strategic plan and deviations appropriately noted, explained, and justified. • A balanced budget shall be adopted annually with operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses equal to or less than identified revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances. Revenue Policies • Sales tax revenue projections will be revised semi-annually to ensure use of current and relevant data. Staff may adjust annual amounts during the budget preparation process to reflect the most current economic trends. • A strategic application of local funding sources will be used to maximize federal and state funding of projects. • Fiduciary responsibility regarding Western County TUMF revenues shall be exercised, and revenues will be allocated pursuant to Commission direction and the approved 2009 Measure A. • Adopted toll revenue policies will establish congestion pricing in order to maximize throughput on toll facilities. Such pricing will be adjusted quarterly by pre -defined formulas. Debt Management Policies • Outstanding sales tax revenue bonds shall not exceed $975 million. • Toll revenue supported debt may be issued for specific highway projects and may comprise toll revenue bonds and federal loans. • The Commission will maintain 2.0x debt ratio coverage on all senior sales tax revenue debt and 1.3x debt ratio coverage on all toll revenue debt. • Debt issuance will be for major capital projects including engineering, right of way, and construction. Operating requirements, if any, must be paid from current ongoing revenues and may not be financed except for initial toll operations. • Costs of issuance, including the standard underwriter's discount, will not exceed two percent (2%). • The Commission may enter into interest rate swaps to better manage assets and liabilities and take advantage of market conditions to lower overall costs and reduce interest rate risk. • While it is the intent of the Commission to establish a cash debt reserve for long term bond issuance, as necessary, surety bonds can be obtained when beneficial to the Commission. • All sales tax revenue debt must mature prior to the termination of 2009 Measure A on June 30, 2039. • All toll revenue supported debt must mature prior to the expiration of toll facility agreements. Expenditure Accountability Policies • Established priorities for planning and programming of capital projects will be reviewed annually with the Commission. • Actual expenditures will be compared to the budget on at least a quarterly basis, and significant deviations will be appropriately noted, explained, and justified. • Operations and maintenance agreements for toll operations will be implemented, and related costs will be compared to toll financing assumptions. Reserve Policies • The Commission will maintain program reserves in accordance with Measure A and TDA policies and guidelines. • The Commission will establish and maintain a transit operator's reserve of ten percent (10%) for the Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. Additionally, a ten percent (10%) reserve will be established and maintained for each of the Western County transit operators (public bus and commuter rail). • The Commission will establish and maintain reserves for toll operations, capital improvements, and debt service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements. Cash Management and Investment Policies • Where possible, the Commission will encourage receipt of funds by wire transfer to its accounts. • Balances in the bank operating account will be maintained at the amount necessary to meet monthly expenditures. • Construction and operating funds will be invested per the Commission's established investment policy emphasizing in order of priority: 1) safety, 2) liquidity, and 3) yield. • Cash disbursements to local jurisdictions and vendors/consultants will be completed in an expeditious and timely manner. Auditing, Accounting, and Financial Reporting Policies • The Commission will maintain its ERP system in order to integrate project and toll operations accounting needs and improve accounting efficiency. ■ The Commission will issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR); separate financial reports for the LTF, STA, Proposition 1B Rehabilitation and Security Project Accounts, and toll operations upon commencement of such operations; and State Controller's Transportation Planning Agency Financial Transactions Report as well as Government Compensation in California Report. • An audit is to be conducted annually on the Commission's accounting books and records. As long as the Commission has outstanding bonds and federal loans, an independent accounting firm must conduct the audit. • The Commission is responsible for ensuring that audits of Measure A and TDA funding recipients are completed and reviewed for compliance and other matters in a timely manner. Human Resources Management Policies ■ While accommodating the assumption of toll operation responsibilities, Commission staffing levels will be consistent with the intent of its enabling legislation, which envisioned a small, but effective staff. • Contract staff and consultants will be used to augment staff efforts as much as possible to support programs or workloads, which do not appear to be of a permanent nature. Information Technology Management Policy ■ Significant effort will be made to maintain efficient and cost-effective technology infrastructure by continuously upgrading network equipment and software to ensure quality performance, productivity, and connectivity among staff, other agencies, toll operator, and the public. Network security will continue to be a top priority to maintain the integrity of the Commission's network and information. Linking Commission Policy Goals and Departmental Goals and Objectives The following matrix (Table 19) illustrates the linkage of the Commission's overall policy goals described in this section to the individual departmental goals and objectives included in Section 6. Table 19 - Relationship Between Commission and Departmental Goals Goods System Environmental Economic iorermodalism & Financial & Department Mobility Movement Miele ncies Stewardship Development Foxe ssibility Communications Administration Management Services Executive Management X x X X X Administration X X Legislative Affairs & Communications X x x X X Finance X Regional Programs Planning and Programming X x X X X X X Rail Maintenance and Operations X X X X X Public and Specialized Transit X X X X X Commuter Assistance X X X X X X Motorist Assistance X X X X Capital Project Development & Delivery X X X x X X X ����. . �� I g n m a n i R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n O P h i m i J i m q Budget Process Summary The budget is the primary performance tool used to measure and control accountability of public agencies for taxpayer dollars. The budget communicates to all stakeholders (i.e., elected officials, regional agencies, and citizens) how the investment they made will be put to use by providing detailed information on the specifics of resource allocation and expenditures. Progress is monitored on a monthly basis, and revisions and updates are made as deemed necessary to reflect changing dynamics and accommodate unplanned requests. This results in a budget document that is useful and meaningful as a benchmark against which to evaluate government accomplishments and/or challenges and to assess compliance with fiscal accountability. Unlike many governments that provide direct services to the general public, the Commission has the overall responsibility of managing transportation planning and funding for Riverside County. As a result its budget, in terms of dollars, is comprised primarily of capital -related programs and projects; the operating component of the budget is related to multimodal programs (commuter and motorist assistance services, rail operations, and transit planning). Management services, which consist of executive management, administration, legislative affairs and communications, and finance, provide support to both capital and operating programs and projects. Chart 7 depicts the organization of the Commission's oversight and management functions. The budget process consists of six primary tasks conducted in phases throughout the fiscal year. Chart 6 illustrates the budget process for the development of the FY 2013/14 budget and monitoring of the FY 2012/13 budget. A summary of each task is described below. Chart 6—Budget Process ID Task Name Duration 2012 2013 J FAIS 10 N D JI F IMIAIMIJ 1 Short Term Strategic Direction Phase 140 days 2 Resource Identification and Allocation Phase 200 days - .11.1111111111 3 Needs Assessment Phase 120 days 4 Development and Review Phase 150 days 5 Adoption and Implementation Phase ^Budget 45 days 6 Roles and Responsibilities 365 days Short -Term Strategic Direction Phase The first phase of the budget process is to determine the direction of the Commission in the short-term and to integrate this with the Commission's long-term goals and objectives, including the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan as discussed in Section 6.3. Annually a workshop is held for the Board to evaluate and determine where the Commission plans to be and what it desires to accomplish over the next five to ten years. Annual reviews allow for timely responsiveness to any significant political, legislative, or economic developments that may occur locally, statewide, or nationally. Staff then adjusts its course based on the long-term strategic direction of the policy makers. Staff convenes in early January to both assess actual results, compared to the current year budget, and map changes in strategy for the ensuing fiscal year by reviewing and, if necessary, redefining departmental mission statements and setting goals. Those goals, upon review by the Board, become the Commission's short-term strategic direction. Chart 7 — Functional Organization Chart FY 2013/14 Mohms octal Programs lel titer Assisi mire la= FsIs Pla nning Board of Commissioners PQLpr Committees W RC Programs &Prole % ERC Prog ram s& Nolen/5 •Budget & Insole m entat l[n Adrltarie COMM it lee} -iedrnitaI Adrispry •Citircns Advisory Adrnlnist reran rr Human Resources feowl ive trim mlitter Legal Counsel Lsenrtrve Management 1 tegi7latNB Alt air% & Cons m mica lmrs Uwe AdleXacy Rela� _ yT G nods Morrm err* Caprtal Protect Dead opm arts & Del kvot IRte iranapp ration iJl lmpravement Program Regional Tramp:re at Ion Plan R Conaestlon Management [pAF Program F ruin ce r— f knmrrda I eM Budget alumni ent [metier! Management & PrOturernent Disadvantaged &Meets EMe rprl sa Adnelreirteat ton Resource Identification and Allocation Phase Simultaneous with the short-term strategic direction phase, staff focuses on what funding sources are available and what monies are estimated as carryover from the current year. Additionally, the Commission's fund balances, that are the excess of fund assets over fund liabilities, are analyzed for available appropriation in the following fiscal year. In actuality, resource identification occurs throughout the year, but it is finalized in the upcoming fiscal year budget. Amounts to be borrowed are determined as parts of the long-term strategic planning process, but such amounts are adjusted in the annual budget to reflect more current information. Needs Assessment Phase Staff and consultants evaluate what projects and studies need to be accomplished. Project priority and sequencing set in the long-term strategic plan are the top candidates for budget submission. However, priorities may have changed due to economic necessities or political realities, resulting in projects being rescheduled by acceleration or postponement. New projects may be added or existing priorities deleted based on Commission direction. Development and Review Phase Using all the data and information gathered from the previously mentioned stages, department managers submit their desired budgets to the Finance Department. The information, along with staff and overhead allocations, is compiled into a preliminary or draft budget. After review by the Executive Director and inclusion of the desired changes, the draft budget is presented to the Board for input. Adoption and Implementation Phase The proposed budget is submitted to the Commission at its May meeting. A hearing is scheduled to allow for public comment on the proposed budget. The Commission may choose, after public hearing, to adopt the budget or to request additional information and/or changes to the budget. The budget must be adopted no later than June 15 of each year. Upon adoption by the Commission, the budget is entered into the ERP system effective July 1 for the next fiscal year. Budget Roles and Responsibilities Involvement in the budget permeates all staffing levels, as presented in Chart 8, at the Commission from clerical support staff to policy makers. Each program manager develops a detailed line item budget that consists of the operating and/or capital components. Those budgets, by program, are submitted to the department director for review and concurrence. The department managers submit their budgets to the Chief Financial Officer by mid -March. The Finance Department compiles the department budgets. Both the capital and operating budgets are combined into the draft budget for the entire Commission. The Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director review the entire budget for overall consistency with both the short- and long-term strategic direction of the Commission, appropriateness of funding sources for the identified projects and programs, and reasonableness of the operating and capital budget expenditures. Expenditure activities of the funds are controlled at the budgetary unit, which is the financial responsibility level (General, Measure A, Motorist Assistance, LTF, STA, TUMF, Capital Projects, and Debt Service Funds) for each function (i.e., administration, programs, intergovernmental distributions, debt service, capital outlay, and other financing uses). These functions provide the legal level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount). Budget -to -actual reports are available to program managers and directors on a real-time basis through the ERP system for informational and management purposes, including identification and evaluation of any significant budget variations. During the fiscal year management has the discretion to transfer budgeted amounts within the financial responsibility unit according to function or may provide support for supplemental budget appropriations requests. Supplemental budget requests require the authorization of the Commission. The Commission may take action at any monthly meeting to amend the budget. In some years, the Finance Department may compile miscellaneous requests and submit a budget appropriations adjustment at mid -year to the Commission for approval. Those budget amendments approved by the Commission are incorporated into the budget, as they occur, and are reflected in the CAFR in the final budget amounts reported in the budgetary schedules. Chart 8 — Staff Organization Chart FY 2013/14 Mum. Resaurcos Ark,' ingll.luf Offkri &NW: SMI.ie.r M.IWaf 54n1DrAdm..Ntt.Ir.e Asehwµ Ad Ini4htrHWa ASswla I IeI l Ptoonentenr Manage! Fiminp Mnatie eunncFer arncurrm.ri! An.rytl Armunli,r SupOYMer L AccnunrinN rrehn.i.n{rl A.xvunle,y A1lhrant lll Samar Office reset.rnt Gee& Maw. Wahl Mum", eP.rd niCadimliiI0eNer Fareudve pntrGf Go✓o mimed Re lotions Mr.fret r MW[Imeghollervrtel Ple.Amg [Prupanmdne prerlur Cirn rlo. 14111491001 stafoloatra trwouuuewr Scarf A nare,i Cammuin.6 MOtame Ayset.noe Manager 1. s,arrAn.ly,t w OW'. Proor.mmi i Mwnager Sen ler StafrAnaryoi SlHF AngeYr Communing &Amon' Mop a(.f Prolent Drveiopmeni Osmrtar csrluil noise MmagarNl Cpaal SYgeRy Caettaly R OW. Pe.n.err Neht of Way Mon mer senior slam Analyst - Ste Anar/ss Fdlfar AQminkveee iMil Ilium is.......,..___ Riverside County Transport*Non Commission tttl it m a � !ayd A g At Fund Budgets Budgetary Basis The Commission accounts for its budgeted governmental funds using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The basis of accounting is the same as the basis of budgeting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available to meet current year obligations. Revenues are considered to be available when they are guaranteed as to receipt, based on expenditure of funds (i.e., government matching funds), or certain to be received within 180 days of the end of the fiscal year. Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred; however, debt service expenditures are recorded when the payment is due. Total sources and uses by governmental fund type for the FY 2013/14 budget are shown in Chart 9. Chart 9 — Total Sources and Uses by Governmental Fund Type FY 2013/14 ■ Total Sources 8% ■ Total Uses 3% ■ Total Sources 47% ■ Total Uses 39% Fund Structure ■ Total Sources 1% ■ Total Uses 2% III General Fund ■Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds IN Debt Service Fund ■ Total Sources 44% ■ Total Uses 56% There are 29 funds (Chart 10) that account for the Commission's budgeted resources and are categorized into four governmental fund types: General fund, special revenue funds, capital projects funds, and debt service funds. All of the Commission's funds are budgeted. There are three funds reported in the General fund and 21 in the special revenue funds. Three capital projects funds are used to account for capital project expenditures financed with short- or long-term debt proceeds. In addition, the Commission has two debt service funds to account for debt - related activity. Chart 10 — Budgeted Funds Structure FY 2013/14 General Fund Adtnln htratlon Rail Operation Planning and Progn agning Special Revenue Funds 1B119 Measurf ■ W sYi • rn County Hyhway RIG aortal I� 2009 Measure A Western County Highways Local Streets & Roads Public Transit Specialized Transit Bus Transit Rail Transit Commuter Assistance New Ccrrirlcn goad ryncing &eltlonal Alt. rink &enernic(eye lupine nt LasAcheRs aeuey Higln.ays & Regionel Arterlel s foal Sinters& Roads SpedsMed Tranwi Pala garde U.IMy !Axel Mrtert & Roads SSP SATE l er el Tr a nseo rtallon Th nds Siete Transit Assistance TUMT J Capital Projects Funds i Debt Service Funds Sales Tam Bonds Toll Rey en ue Bonds General Fund Overview The General fund of the Commission is used to account for all activities not legally required or designated by Board action to be accounted for separately. For many public agencies, the General fund is the largest fund; however, it is less significant for the Commission. The Commission's largest revenue source is Measure A, a locally levied sales tax that legally must be accounted for separately in special revenue funds. In addition to Commission administration and general operations, other General fund activities include commuter rail maintenance and operations as well as planning and programming. The FY 2013/14 budget for the General fund is presented in Table 20, followed by a discussion of significant components of the budget. Table 20 - General Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax $ 2,700,000 Federal Reimbursements 9,300 State Reimbursements 176,000 Local Reimbursements 187,300 Other Revenue 47,900 Investment Income 55.200 TOTAL Revenues 3,175,700 2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 100,000 4% 470,000 10,000 25,000 (445,000) -95% 910,000 400,000 1,119,000 209,000 23% 225,200 277,700 224,800 (400) 0% - - N/A 67,900 27,000 20,200 (47,700) -70% 4,373,100 3,414,700 4,189,000 (184,100) -4% Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits 3,270,400 3,350,800 3,392,600 3,991,700 640,900 19% Professional and Support Professional Services 1,639,000 2,800,900 2,022,600 3,024,100 223,200 8% Support Costs 2.544.800 3,295.400 2,901,000 3.292.700 (2,700) 0% TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 4,183,800 6,096,300 4,923,600 6,316,800 220,500 4% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 1,398,800 1,394,800 1,300,500 1,471,700 76,900 6% Engineering 39,400 39,500 5,000 (34,400) -87% Operating and Capital Disbursements 18,981,200 13,411,200 9,956,900 14,400,000 988,800 7% Special Studies 169,500 760,000 250,000 914,000 154,000 20% TOTAL Projects and Operations 20,549,500 15,605,400 11,546,900 16,790,700 1,185,300 8% Debt Service Principal Payments 23,900 N/A Interest Payments 1,300 - - - N/A TOTAL Debt Service 25,200 - - - N/A Capital Outlay 67,500 205,700 116,900 439,200 233,500 114% TOTAL Expenditures 28,096,400 25,258,200 19,980,000 27,538,400 2,280,200 9% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (24,920,700) (20,885,100) (16,565,300) (23,349,400) (2,464,300) 12% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 25,633,600 20,470,300 19,424,100 14,896,600 (5,573,700) -27% Transfers Out (552,0001 N/A Net Financing Sources (Uses) 25,081,600 20,470,300 19,424,100 14,896,600 (5,573,700) •27% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 160,900 (414,800) 2,858,800 (8,452,800) (8,038,000) 1938% Beginning Fund Balance 13,524,300 2,685,200 13,685,700 16,544,000 2,858,800 21% ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 13,685,20C $ 13,270,400 $ 1E044,000 $ 8,091,200 5 (5,179,200) -39% The sources for the General fund (Chart 11) consist of allocations from Measure A sales tax revenues; various other federal, state and local reimbursements for planning activities and commuter rail station maintenance; investment income; transfers from LTF, TUMF, and motorist assistance for administration; transfers of LTF sales tax revenues for planning, programming, and monitoring (PPM) activities; transfers of LTF Article 4 allocations for commuter rail transit operations and capital; and other transfers for rail station maintenance of park and ride facilities. Chart 11— General Fund Sources FY 2013/14 MeasureASales Tax r 15% State Reimbursements 6% Local Reimbursements 1% Transfers In 7.5% Measure A sales tax revenues allocated for administration of $2,800,000 has increased 4% compared to the prior year to offset increased expenditures. The administrative allocation may be adjusted at mid -year based on required expenditures, but in no event will exceed four percent (4%) of total Measure A revenues (including administrative salaries and benefits). Federal reimbursements represent funding for interns. The 95% decrease is due to the delay in grant funding for the Riverside station pedestrian improvement project. State reimbursements include STIP funds for a commuter rail feasibility study in the Coachella Valley and to fund PPM activities. Local reimbursements are from other local agencies related to a portion of the security costs at the commuter rail stations. LTF sales tax revenues from the Local Transportation Fund, a special revenue fund, are allocated and transferred to the General fund for administration, planning and programming, and rail transit operations and capital for the following purposes: • Administration allocations from LTF sales tax revenues of $800,000 in FY 2013/14 have increased $100,000 compared to the prior year to offset increased expenditures. • Planning allocations are set by law at three percent (3%) of estimated LTF sales tax revenues. The FY 2012/13 revised budget of $2,451,400 includes the effect of the mid -year projection adjustment. This adjustment usually includes the unapportioned carryover amount, which is not determined until after the prior year's fiscal year end, and revised revenue projections. The FY 2013/14 budget for planning allocations is $2,175,000. • Transit funding for commuter rail, which is tied to sales tax revenues, is based on operating and capital needs to the extent that revenues and reserved fund balance are available. The FY 2013/14 budget includes $8,141,100 in LTF and $112,200 in Measure A commuter assistance allocations primarily to fund operating and capital contribution expenditures to SCRRA as well as rail station operations and maintenance. • Allocations aggregating $2,246,200 for local jurisdictions' grade separation projects were included in the FY 2012/13 General fund revised budget. The FY 2013/14 budget includes LTF allocations of $2,600,000 for grade separation projects. Administrative transfers in from TUMF and motorist assistance of $1,068,300 in FY 2013/14 increased from $936,400 in FY 2012/13. Chart 12 — General Fund Uses FY 2013/14 Capital Outlay 2% Personnel Salary and Benefits 14% AiiiiProfessional Services 11% ._ 14% Support Costs 12% General fund uses are depicted in Chart 12. Personnel salary and benefits expenditures increased 19% because of the addition of two FTEs for a human resources administrator and planning and programming director; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by the employee's contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs increased 8% due to increased professional services for investment advisory services and planning and programming grant administration. Support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Projects and operations expenditures increased 8% because of increased special studies for a new commuter rail feasibility study in the Coachella Valley. The FY 2013/14 budget includes no allocation for rail capital contributions and $2,600,000 for grade separation projects. Capital outlay expenditures increased 114% due to information technology upgrades to the Commission's data communication room and electronic document management system. Special Revenue Funds Overview The Commission's special revenue funds are legally restricted as to use for Measure A projects and programs, TUMF projects, motorist assistance services, and funding transit operations and capital in the County. The special revenue funds' budgets are summarized in Table 21, and individual budgets are presented in Tables 22 through 29 along with respective discussions. Table 21— Special Revenue Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 Actual Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE FY 12/13 Revised Budget $ 132,284,300 $ 66,556,700 13,487,500 25,102,000 21,235,300 1,821,300 8,116,400 1,382,200 1,967,000 271,952,700 138,300,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 69,699,900 17,007,800 2,463,500 7,557,300 882,800 2,071,000 321,694,800 2,802,200 3,620,300 9,993,200 1,183,300 11,176,500 9,795,400 21,366,500 27,451,200 16,285,700 53,728,100 52,677,000 67,000 40,127,900 8,962,700 230,461,500 142,200 244,582,400 11,875,800 2,037,900 13,913,700 17,485,700 27,573,500 125,994,100 29,050,000 104,222,700 84,424,600 40,000 42,129,000 16,455,400 447,375,000 242,000 465,151,000 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget $ 138,300,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 39,567,200 20,906,500 2,311,700 7,268,200 493,500 857,300 293,416,900 3,567,600 11,338,100 1,685,900 13,024,000 12,955,100 16,540,900 60,326,900 29,050,000 61,595,400 58,822,300 70,000 42,129,000 20,500,400 301,990,000 88,300 318,669,900 $ 144,200,000 72,500,000 13,298,000 91,620,000 132,377,300 2,729,600 6,723,400 500,000 1.030.400 464,978,700 3,957,700 21,615,000 2,300,600 23,915,600 18,635,400 20,355,000 240,968,400 217,750,000 164,707,800 108,210,800 25,000 43,825,900 25,157.500 839,635,800 357.000 867,866,100 Dollar Change $ 5,900,000 3,000,000 (914,500) 21,920,100 115,369,500 266,100 (833,900) (382,800) (1,040.600) 143,283,900 Percent Change 4% 4% -6% 31% 678% 11% -11% -43% -50% 45% 337,400 9% 9,739,200 262,700 10,001,900 1,149,700 (7,218,500) 114,974,300 188,700,000 60,485,100 23,786,200 (15,000) 1,696,900 8302.100 392,260,800 115.000 402,715,100 82% 13% 72% 7% -26% 91% 650% 58% 28% -38% 4% 53% 88% 48% 87% 27,370,300 (143,456,200) (25,253,000) (402,887,400) (259,431,200) 181% 44,150,600 (61,005,500) (16,854,900) 151,092,900 (74,323,800) 76,769,100 90,002,100 (43,906,500) 46,095,600 387,406,200 (66,075,200) 321,331,000 236,313,300 8,248,600 244,561,900 156% -11% 319% 10,515,400 (66,687,100) 20,842,600 (81,556,400) (14,869,300) 22'i; 463,492,600 474.008,000 474,008,000 494.850,600 20.842.600 4% $ 474,008,000 $ 407,320,900 $ 494,850,600 $ 413,294,200 $ 5,973,300 1% Measure A and LTF sales taxes, STA allocations, Western County TUMF, state budgetary allocations, and vehicle registration fees are all accounted for in the 21 special revenue funds. Federal, state, and local reimbursements and transfers in consisting principally of debt proceeds are used to supplement the Measure A sales tax revenues. Chart 13 illustrates the various special revenue fund sources. Chart 13 — Special Revenue Funds Sources FY 2013/14 Measure A Sales Tax 17% LTF Sales Tax 8% 144r._ STASaIes Tax 2% Federal Reimbursements 12% 'local Reimbursements 0% State Reimbursements 16% The special revenue funds' resources are expended on County highway, rail, regional arterial, and new corridors engineering, right of way acquisition, construction, and design build; local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction; economic development incentives; bond financing; bicycle and pedestrian facilities; education and incentive programs to encourage use of alternate modes of transportation; special social service transportation programs; public transit operations and capital needs; and motorist towing and freeway call box assistance. As shown in Chart 14, projects and operations expenditures represent the primary use of special revenue fund resources. Chart 14 — Special Revenue Funds Uses FY 2013/14 Personnel Salary and Benefits 7 Professional Services Transfers Out I 2% 7% . Support Costs i Projects and Operations 90% Measure A Special Revenue Funds Of the special revenue funds, 16 are funded primarily with Measure A sales tax revenue, which is allocated to the three geographic areas of the County (Chart 15). The Measure A funds are comprised of two 1989 Measure A and ten 2009 Measure A Western County operating funds, three 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley operating funds, and one 2009 Measure A Palo Verde Valley operating fund. Chart 15 — Measure A Sales Tax Revenues by Geographic Area Palo Verde Valley 1% Coachella Valley 24% Western County 75% Since the 1989 Measure A terminated on June 30, 2009, the remaining 1989 Measure A Western County operating funds will be closed upon the completion of the specific highway and rail projects. With the commencement of the 2009 Measure A on July 1, 2009, the 14 operating funds will be in existence for the 30-year term. These funds account for all Measure A project and program expenditures and transfers of debt service for capital projects. The Measure A special revenue funds expend monies on capital construction and improvements to highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, new corridors, and local streets and roads. Funding is also reserved for commuter assistance, public and specialized transit, and economic development incentives programs as well as bond financing costs. The Commission is a self-help county, and, as such on major highway projects, the Commission supplements the State's spending. Upon completion of most highway projects, Ca!trans takes over the maintenance and operations of the projects. All revenues from the Measure A sales tax have been pledged as security for the Commission's senior sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper notes. Debt service on the bonds is recorded in the Sales Tax Bonds debt service funds, and most of the resources for the cash payments are provided through transfers out by the Measure A special revenue funds for the 2009 Measure A bonds. Debt service for the commercial paper notes is recorded in a capital projects fund, as the notes will be paid from 2009 Measure A sales tax revenues or retired with proceeds from sales tax revenue bonds. Western County Measure A Operating Funds The Western County Measure A Operating special revenue funds account for Western County's approximately 75% share of the Measure A sales tax. As demonstrated in Table 22, most of the Commission's reimbursements flow through these funds, since the sales tax leverages state and federal dollars. Table 22 - Western County Measure A Operating Funds FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Sources Measure A Sales Tax Bond Financing Commuter Assistance Economic Development Incentives Highways Local Streets and Roads New Corridors Public Bus Transit Rail Regional Arterials Specialized Transit Total Measure A Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional Services Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads TOTAL Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Transfers Out TOTAL Uses $ 8,066,500 $ 8,433,000 1,493,800 1,562,000 1,195,000 1,249,000 30,473,300 31,859,000 28,979,500 30,297,000 11,054,000 11,557,000 2,158,500 1,593,000 6,094,700 6,372,000 8,962,800 9,370,000 1,904,600 2,655,000 100, 382, 700 104,947,000 24,972,400 69,699,900 17, 482,000 13, 457,800 1,317,400 1,933,900 1,826,600 1,257,300 1,274,500 882,800 1,040,700 1,392,800 39, 365,300 130,834,000 187,661,600 324,405,500 2,515,200 3,206,500 8,831,400 10,755,700 667,600 1,149,000 7,126,400 14,188,800 17,469,900 23,621,500 26,059,800 96,688,100 16,285,700 29,050,000 49,420,200 92,878,400 4,290,800 5,189,000 67,000 40,000 28,375,700 29,842,000 149,095,500 291,497,800 142,200 242,000 44,771,400 34,924,800 206,023,300 341,775,800 $ 8,433,000 1,562,000 1,249,000 31,859,000 30,297,000 11,557,000 1,593,000 6,372,000 9,370,000 2,655,000 104,947,000 39,567,200 17,320,100 1,824,100 968,200 493,500 445,800 82,084,600 247,650,500 3,163,700 10,072,500 803,800 9,792,100 12,355,000 51,080,800 29,050,000 57,126,600 4,345,200 70,000 29,842,000 193,661,700 88,300 18,258,200 226,048,200 FY 13/14 Budget $ 8,711,000 1,613,000 1,291,000 32,907,000 31,294,000 11,937,000 1,645,000 6,581,000 9,679,000 2.743.000 108,401,000 91,620,000 128,197,300 2,227,000 423,400 500,000 621,800 354,136,700 686,127,200 3,467,000 20,154,200 1,420,600 14,650,600 12,982,000 199,484,300 217,750,000 154,980,000 7,834,000 25,000 211 G2A CM 638,340,800 357,000 34,804,900 698,544,500 Dollar Change Percent Change $ 278,000 3% 51,000 3% 42,000 3% 1,048,000 3% 997,000 3% 380,000 3% 52,000 3% 209,000 3% 309,000 3% 88,000 3% 3,454,000 3% 21,920,100 31% 114,739,500 853% 293,100 15% (833,900) -66% (382,800) -43% (771,000) -55% 223,302,700 171% 361,721,700 112% 260,500 8% 9,398,500 87% 271,600 24% 461,800 3% (10,639,500) -45% 102,796,200 106% 188,700,000 650% 62,101,600 67% 2,645,000 51% (15,000) -38% 792,900 3% 346,843,000 119% 115,000 48% (119,900) 0% 356,768,700 104% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ (18,361,700) $ (17,370,300) $ 21,602,300 $ (12,417,300) $ 4,953,000 -29% The budgeted Western County Measure A sales tax revenues reflect a 3% increase compared to the prior year due to revised Measure A sales tax projections. Taxable sales changes between jurisdictions within the County also periodically affect the geographic allocation formula from year to year. Federal reimbursements for highway and rail projects and the commuter assistance program, which are higher in the FY 2013/14 budget and relate to funding from the FTA, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), Surface Transportation Program (STP), and earmarks. The 31% increase in federal reimbursements is primarily attributable to the commencement of construction on the Perris Valley Line project. State reimbursements are higher by 853% compared to the FY 2012/13 budget and reflect funding from STIP and Proposition 16 funding for various highway and rail projects, particularly the 1-215 and SR-91 corridor improvement projects and the Perris Valley Line. Local reimbursement increases are attributable to the commuter assistance program and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. TUMF revenue represents reimbursements from TUMF zone funds administered by WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange construction and right of way acquisition, and the decrease in these TUMF reimbursements reflects the near completion of the project. Other revenue is related to property management lease revenues, which reflects a decrease from the prior year and is related to properties acquired in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Investment income is lower compared to the previous year's budget due to lower ending projected cash balances resulting from the commencement of construction on the Perris Valley Line and the SR-91 corridor improvement project. As in prior years, a significant portion of transfers in consists of debt proceeds of $342,227,600 from sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, and commercial paper notes to fund 2009 Measure A Western County highway projects. Other significant transfers in include funding from STA and debt service reserve funds aggregating $11,250,000 for rail capital projects and $659,100 for regional arterials in accordance with the 2009 Measure A related to a city not eligible to receive the local street and roads funds. Personnel salary and benefits expenditures increased 8% because of the addition of two FTE allocations for a facilities administrator and capital projects manager; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by the employee's contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Measure A Western County professional services expenditures in FY 2013/14 consist of general legal services for the various programs and capital projects, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the SR-91 and 1-15 corridor improvement projects, other professional services for rail capital and commuter assistance projects, and professional fees related to the Commission's debt programs. The increase of 87% in FY 2013/14 compared to the previous year reflects investment advisory services and legal services related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project financing and rail service easement activities in preparation for the commencement of commuter rail service on the Perris Valley Line. Support costs comprise operations for the commuter assistance program and property management services. General program operations comprise the program management with outside consultants for the highway and rail capital and commuter assistance programs, permits required for capital projects, and subsidies and certificates for the commuter assistance program. Such levels of operations typically fluctuate as project activities transition to another phase. Many of the Commission's Western County rail and highway projects funded by Measure A have been in the project development phase for several years and are now near or in the construction phase. Accordingly, engineering expenditures are expected to decrease 45%, while construction and design -build activities are anticipated to increase 106% and 650%, respectively. Projects still in the engineering and/or final design phase but at a decreased level of costs include the SR-91 and I- 215 corridor (southbound connector) improvements, the SR-91 HOV lanes, and 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connectors. The 74/215 interchange and 1-215 corridor improvements central segments, which commenced construction in June 2010 and March 2011, respectively, will continue through FY 2013/14. Several Western County TUMF regional arterial projects will be under construction in FY 2013/14. After many years of project development, the Perris Valley Line project is anticipated to begin construction in FY 2013/14, subject to obtaining final FTA approvals. In addition to the design and construction, other design -build activities related to the SR-91 corridor improvements during FY 2013/14 include utility and railroad agreements and the agency, legal, financial, and engineering consultant staff to support these activities. Right of way acquisition is another major project activity for which the process can be lengthy. Significant right of way acquisitions will benefit the SR-91 corridor improvement, SR-91 HOV lanes, 91/71 interchange improvement, Mid County Parkway, and various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects. Operating and capital disbursements are higher by 51% compared to the FY 2012/13 budget and relate to Western County intercity bus service and specialized transit expenditures funded by Measure A. Local streets and roads comprise turn back payments to local jurisdictions and increased as a result of the higher Measure A sales tax revenues. Capital outlay includes equipment and improvements for the rail and commuter assistance programs. Significant transfers out include funding for debt service payments of $16,000,000; reimbursements of $1,000,000 from the 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund; rail operating needs of $112,200 from 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund; 1989 Measure A Western County regional arterial fund contribution of $17,000,000 for various TUMF projects; 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads fund allocation of $659,100 to 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterials fund; and $33,600 for CHP FSP on the I-215 corridor improvements central segment project. Coachella Valley Measure A Operating Funds These special revenue funds account for Coachella Valley's 24% share of the Measure A sales tax. Table 23 — Coachella Valley Measure A Operating Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Measure A Sales Tax Highways & Regional Arterials $ 15,499,500 $ 16,205,000 $ 16,205,000 $ 17,391,000 $ 1,186,000 7% Local Streets and Roads 10,849,700 11,343,000 11,343,000 12,173,000 830,000 7% Specialized Transit 4,649,900 4,861,000 4,861,000 5,217,000 356,000 7% Total Measure A 30,999,100 32,409,000 32,409,000 34,781,000 2,372,000 7% Federal Reimbursements 9,800 - N/A Investment Income 63,100 12,600 41,900 14,100 1,500 12% Transfers In 284,100 - N/A TOTAL Sources 31,356,100 32,421,600 32,450,900 34,795,100 2,373,500 7% Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits 1,300 2,700 2,000 7,500 4,800 178% Professional Services 2,000 3,500 1,600 3,500 0% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 6,800 5,000 7,000 200 3% Construction 99,000 N/A Operating and Capital Disbursements 4,256,800 4,500,000 4,500,000 5,500,000 1,000,000 22% Local Streets and Roads 10,849,700 11,343,000 11,343,000 12,173,000 830,000 7% Regional Arterials 8,962,700 16,455,400 20,400.400 25.000.000 8.544.600 52% TOTAL Projects and Operations 24,168,200 32,305,200 36,248,400 42.680.000 10,374,800 32% TOTAL Uses 24,171,500 32,311,400 36,252,000 42,691,000 10,379,600 32% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 7,184,600 $ 110,200 $ (3,801,100) $ (7,895,900) $ (8,006,100) -7265% As shown in Table 23, overall budgeted Coachella Valley Measure A sales tax revenues increased 7% due to revised Measure A sales tax revenue projections. Taxable sales changes among the geographic areas also impact the geographic allocation formula from year to year. Personnel salary and benefits expenditures are minimal based on FTE allocations for coordination of debt financing activities of certain Coachella Valley projects. The Coachella Valley operating and capital disbursements represent specialized transit funds distributed to SunLine for transit operations. Local streets and roads comprise turn back payments to local jurisdictions and are directly affected by changes in Measure A sales tax revenues. Regional arterial projects are highway and regional arterial projects managed by CVAG. Debt service for CVAG highway and regional arterial and the City of Indio local streets and roads projects under advance funding agreements are reflected in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the financial system. Palo Verde Valley Measure A Operating Fund This special revenue fund accounts for Palo Verde Valley's 1% share of the Measure A sales tax. Table 24 — Palo Verde Valley Measure A Operating Fund FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Sources Measure A Sales Tax Local Streets and Roads TOTAL Sources Uses Projects and Operations Local Streets and Roads TOTAL Uses $ 902,500 $ 944,000 $ 944,000 902,500 944,000 944,000 902,500 944,000 944,000 902,500 944,000 944,000 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ FY 13/14 Budget $ 1,018,000 1,018,000 1,018,000 1,018,000 Dollar Percent Change Change $ 74,000 8% 74,000 74,i,G'0 74,000 $ N/A The Measure A sales tax revenues are affected by the impact of shifts in taxable sales changes on the geographic allocation formula as well as updated revenue projections. In the Palo Verde Valley as noted in Table 24, expenditures are for local streets and roads. Debt service for the City of Blythe local streets and roads projects under an advance funding agreement are reflected in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the financial system. Non -Measure A Special Revenue Funds The non -Measure A special revenue funds account for LTF disbursements; TUMF Western County project costs; motorist assistance expenditures for towing service, freeway call boxes, and 1E511 system operations; and transit disbursements from STA. These activities are budgeted in the LTF, TUMF, FSP and SAFE, and STA special revenue funds, respectively. Local Transportation Fund The LTF special revenue fund derives its revenue from one quarter of one cent of the state sales tax that is returned to source and provides for funding of public transit operations in the County, bicycle and pedestrian facility projects, planning, and administration (Table 25). Table 25 — Local Transportation Fund FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 Actual Sources LTF Sales Tax Local Reimbursements Investment Income TOTAL Sources Uses Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements TOTAL Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL Uses Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 66,556,700 $ 40,800 317,800 66,915,300 69,500,000 $ 69,500,000 $ 72,500,000 $ 3,000,000 4% N/A 347,800 81,000 214,500 (133,300) -38% 69,847,800 69,581,000 72,714,500 2,866,700 4% 42,126,100 60,630,600 47,027,100 69,274,800 8,644,200 14% 42,126,100 60,630,600 47,027,100 69,274,800 8,644,200 14% 14,910,500 19,382,600 18,336.400 13,716.100 (5,666,500) -29% 57,036,600 80,013,200 65,363,500 82,990,900 2,972,700 4% $ 9,878,700 $ (10,165,400) $ 4,217,500 $ (10,276,400) $ (111,000) 1% The LTF sales tax revenue in FY 2013/14 is projected to increase 4% from the prior year. Investment income is expected to decrease due to lower ending projected cash balances in FY 2013/14. In FY 2013/14, approximately 80% and 20% of the LTF transit expenditures of $67,439,000 are for operating and capital purposes, respectively. LTF operating allocations consist of 80% to Western County, 19% to Coachella Valley, and 1% to Palo Verde Valley public bus operators. The actual allocations will not be approved until July 2013. Other operating and capital disbursements include allocations for SB821 bicycle and pedestrian projects of $1,280,000 and planning and administration allocations of $555,800 to the County Auditor -Controller and SCAG. Transfers out include allocations to the Commission's General fund for planning and administration of $2,975,000, rail operations and station maintenance of $8,141,100, and grade separation projects of $2,600,000. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund The TUMF fund accounts for the Commission's share of developer fee assessments on new residential and commercial developments in Western County for regional arterials and CETAP corridors (Table 26). TUMF revenue is projected to remain unchanged due to the recovering housing market. The transfers in for FY 2013/14 relate to funding from the 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterials fund of $17,000,000 for the cities of Corona, Moreno Valley, and San Jacinto and the County projects and TUMF CETAP of $15,319,500 for the city of Temecula's regional arterial projects along 1-15. Table 26 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Sources Federal Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits Professional Services Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Right of Way/Land Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL Uses $ 119,800 6,289,800 326,500 3,701,200 10,437,300 136,400 370,300 300 277,000 3,896,600 1,292,400 4,307,900 $ - $ 6,300,000 78,600 1%221,900 6,300,000 156,000 6,880,500 25,600,500 13, 336,500 235,200 226,000 399,100 527,500 4,300 1,900 280,100 223,000 3,952,000 4,185,900 29,246,000 9,246,100 11,344,300 4,468,800 100,000 9,773,900 44,822,400 18,223,800 227,000 18,445,100 5,990,600 10,507,900 63,906,100 24,969,800 FY 13/14 Budget 6,300,000 60,300 32,319 500 38,679,800 296,000 690,800 4,100 342,800 7,373,000 41,484,100 9,727,800 157,500 59,085,200 16,013,300 76,089,400 Dollar Change Percent Change $ N/A 0% (18,300) -23% 13,097,600 68% 13,079,300 51% 60,800 26% 291,700 73% (200) -5% 62,700 22% 3,421,000 87% 12,238,100 42% (1,616,500) -14% 157,500 N/A 14,262,800 32% (2,431,800) -13% 12,183,300 19% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ (70,600) $ (38,305,600) $ (11,633,300) a 17/A1)7.0W/ $ 896,000 -2% Personnel salary and benefits have increased 26% due to the allocation of FTEs; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by employee's contributions for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services have increased 73% due to legal services related to property acquisitions. Projects and operations costs increased 32%, as many regional arterial projects move into various stages of engineering, right of way acquisition and construction phases. Approximately 85% of the projects and operations costs are attributable to programmed regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment project. The remaining 15% relates to CETAP projects such as the Mid County Parkway preliminary engineering and right of way acquisitions. Transfers out represent administrative allocations of $693,800 to the General fund and CETAP funding of $15,319,500 for two city of Temecula regional arterial projects along 1-15, which are within the CETAP Winchester to Temecula corridor limits. Freeway Service Patrol Fund The FSP fund accounts for the state and local resources provided to cover the costs of servicing stranded motorists in covered service areas and construction zones by means of towing, changing tires, and providing fuel (Table 27). The State's funding share of $2,680,000 has increased 28% from the FY 2012/13 budget due to increased FSP support of construction projects. Transfers in represent Commission match funds of $916,400 from the SAFE special revenue fund and reimbursements of $33,600 from the 2009 Measure A Western County highway funds for construction FSP service related to the I-215 (central segment) corridor improvements. Table 27 - Freeway Service Patrol Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources State Reimbursements $ 1,988,300 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,136,400 $ 2,680,000 $ 580,000 28% Local Reimbursements 14,400 85,600 600 600 (85,000) -99% Other Revenue 900 - N/A Investment Income 1,600 1,900 500 1,300 (600) -32% Transfers In 800,000 1,037,000 1,037,000 950,000 (87,000) -8% TOTAL Sources 2,805,200 3,224,500 3,174,500 3,631,900 407,400 13% Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits 69,000 50,400 73,900 61,400 11,000 22% Professional Services 33,800 37,000 56,000 51,000 14,000 38% Support Costs 41,200 59,900 57,200 53,200 (6,700) -11% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 2,314,100 2,900,000 2,830,000 3,530,000 630,000 22% TOTAL Projects and Operations 2,314,100 2,900,000 2,830,000 3,530,000 630,000 22% Transfers Out 116,100 174,800 174,800 214,400 39,600 23% TOTAL Uses 2,574,200 3,222,100 3,191,900 3,910.000 687,900 .21% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses 5 231,000 $ 2,400 $ (17,400) $ (278,100) $ (280,500)-11688% Personnel salary and benefits have increased 22% due to the allocation of FTEs; market equity adjustments resulting from the biennial classification and compensation study; 3% for cost of living adjustments offset by employee's contributions for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services have increased 38% from the previous year due to a FSP benefit analysis planned in FY 2013/14. Support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Operating costs for towing services in FY 2013/14 are higher than FY 2012/13 budget due to increased FSP support on construction projects. Transfers out are administrative allocations to the General fund. Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund The SAFE fund accounts for the $1 per vehicle registration fee levied by the State on all registered vehicles within the County. It funds the installation and implementation of emergency aid call boxes located strategically on the highways throughout the County as well as the operations of the IE511 system (Table 28). Table 28 -Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund FY 2012 - 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources State Reimbursements $ 1,765,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 50,000 3% Local Reimbursements 448,700 444,000 487,000 502,000 58,000 13% Other Revenue 106,800 N/A Investment Income 25,600 21,100 13,000 11,700 (9,400) -45% TOTAL Sources 2,346,100 1,915,100 1,950,000 2,013,700 98,600 c Uses Personnel Salary and Benefits 80,300 125,500 102,000 125,800 300 0% Professional Services 755,700 680,500 680,500 715,500 35,000 5% Support Costs 474,200 824,700 823,000 822,700 (2,000) 0% Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 77,900 110,000 105,000 105,000 (5,000) -5% Construction 60,000 (60,000) -100% TOTAL Projects and Operations 77,900 170,000 105,000 105,000 (65,000) -38% Transfers Out 980,500 1,146,500 1,146,500 1,076.500 (70,000) -6% TOTAL Uses 2,368,600 2,947,200 2,857,000 2.845.500 (101,700) 3"5 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ (22,500) $ (1,032,100) $ (907,000) $ (831.800) S 200,300 -19% Local reimbursements represent the pass -through funds from SANBAG as its share of the 1E511 system operating costs and the recoveries from call box knockdowns, which service is provided by a collection agency. Personnel and support costs are comparable to the FY 2012/13 budget. Professional services costs have increased slightly due to the 1E511 website updates. Support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Projects and operations costs decreased as a result of the exclusion of the 1E511 Caltrans detection expansion project at the 60/91/215 interchange in FY 2013/14. The transfers out reflect a matching contribution to the State's contribution for towing services of $916,400 to the FSP special revenue fund and administrative allocations to the General fund of $160,100. State Transit Assistance Fund The STA fund accounts for the state budgetary allocation of gas tax revenues designated for rail and bus transit operations and capital requirements (Table 29). The allocation is based on estimates of diesel fuel sales tax revenues provided by the Controller of the State of California, subject to an annual state budget appropriation. Table 29 — State Transit Assistance Fund FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Sources STA Sales Tax Investment Income TOTAL Sources FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Projected Budget Change $ 13,487,500 $ 14,212,500 $ 14,212,500 $ 191,700 216,200 119,100 13,679, 200 14,428, 700 14,331,600 Uses Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements 2.003,300 TOTAL Projects and Operations 2,003,300 Transfers Out 13,298,000 $ (914,500) 106,700 (109,500) 13,404,700 (1,024,000) Percent Change -6% -51% -7% 14,105,000 2,950,000 25,602,000 11,497,000 82% 14,105,000 2,950,000 25,602,000 11,497,000 82% 250.000 250,000 - 0% TOTAL Uses 2,003,300 14.355.000 2.950.000 25,852,000 11,497,000 80% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 11,675,900 $ 73,700 $ 11,381,600 $ (12,447,300) $ (12,521,000)-16989% Investment income is expected to decrease because of lower cash balances due to increased capital disbursements to operators. The operating and capital disbursements consist of allocations for bus capital purposes. In FY 2013/14, 68% of the allocations are in Western County, 31% in Coachella Valley, and 1% in Palo Verde Valley. Transfers out represent rail capital allocations to the 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund. Similar to the LTF allocations, the actual STA allocations will not be approved until July 2013. Capital Projects Funds Overview The capital projects funds account for all debt proceeds from commercial paper notes and sales tax and toll revenue bonds (Table 30). Table 30 - Capital Projects Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Investment Income $ 2,130,500 $ 5,103,600 $ 24,000 $ 1.877,700 S (3,225,900) -63% TOTAL Revenues 2,130,500 5,103,600 24,000 1,877,700 (3,225,900) -63% Expenditures Professional and Support Professional Services 1,248,100 1,248,100 N/A TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 1,248,100 1,248,100 N/A Projects and Operations Engineering 319,100 (319,100) -100% Construction 1,301,100 N/A Right of Way/Land 8,024,100 3,121.000 (8.024,100) -100% TOTAL Projects and Operations 8,343,200 4,422,100 (8,343,200) -100% Debt Service Principal Payments 40,000,000 120,000,000 80,000,000 (40,000,000) -33% Interest Payments 3,800 433,000 10,600 100,000 (333,000) -77% Cost of Issuance - - 7.500.000 7,500.000 N/A TOTAL Debt Service 40,003,800 120,433,000 10,600 87,600,000 (32,833,000) •27% TOTAL Expenditures 40.003.800 128.776.200 4.432.700 88.848.100 (39.928,100) -31% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (37,873,300) (123,672,600) (4,408,700) (86,970,400) 36,702,200 -30% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 19,177,300 136,889,600 109,900 80,000,000 (56,889,600) -42% Transfers Out (42,962,100) (253,144,800) (81,629,600) (560,250,600) (307,105,800) 121% Debt Proceeds 40,000,000 1,220,172,000 80,000,000 700,774,000 (519,398,000) -43% TIFIA Loan Proceeds - 110,000.000 110,000,000 N/A Net Financing Sources (Uses) 16,215,200 1.103.916,800 (1,519.700) 330,533A00 (773.393,400) -70% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) (21,658,100) 980,244,200 (5,928,400) 243,553,000 (736,691,200) -75% Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE 58,453,600 36,795,500 36,795,500 30,867,100 (5.928,400) -16% $ 36,795,500 $ 1,017,039,700 $ 30,867,100 $ 274,420,100 $ (742,619,600) -73% As illustrated in the following charts, capital projects funds sources primarily consist of debt proceeds (Chart 16), and the significant uses of the capital projects funds are transfers out (Chart 17). In 2005, a commercial paper program was established to advance project development and land and right of way acquisition related to the 2009 Measure A projects. In FY 2012/13, the Commission expects to issue $80,000,000 in commercial paper notes prior to the SR-91 corridor improvement project financing, which is expected at the beginning of FY 2013/14. The commercial paper program anticipates the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds to refinance the outstanding commercial paper notes in FY 2013/14. During FY 2013/14, the Commission expects the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes. In connection with the financing of the SR-91 corridor improvement project in early FY 2013/14, the Commission anticipates the issuance of $404,646,000 in sales tax revenue bonds (2013 Sales Tax Bonds), including $61,089,000 in bond premiums and $207,512,000 in toll revenue bonds, including $7,527,000 in bond premiums, as well as execution of a federal TIFIA loan, from which $110,000,000 is expected to be drawn down in FY 2013/14. Chart 16 — Capital Projects Funds Sources FY 2013/14 Investment Income 0% Transfers In I 9% Debt Proceeds jw 91% Debt proceeds represent the issuance of $20 million in commercial paper notes for the 1-15 and 1-215 corridor improvement projects as well as the proceeds of the sales tax and toll revenue bonds and the federal TIFIA loan drawdown for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Chart 17 — Capital Projects Funds Uses FY 2013/14 Professional Services Debt Service 14% Transfers Out 86% In FY 2013/14, commercial paper and sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds of $342,227,600 will be transferred out to the 2009 Measure A Western County Highway special revenue funds for capital projects, particularly the I- 15, 1-215, and SR-91 corridor improvement projects; $80,000,000 of 2013 sales tax revenue bond proceeds will be transferred out to retire outstanding commercial paper notes; $90,362,000 of 2013 sales tax revenue bond proceeds will be transferred out to the Debt Service fund to pay debt service payments during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project; and $47,661,000 of 2013 toll revenue bond proceeds will be transferred out to the debt service funds to fund a debt service reserve for and to pay debt service payments during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Debt Service Funds Overview Under the 2009 Measure A program, as amended by Measure K in November 2010, the Commission has the authority to issue sales tax revenue bonds subject to a debt limitation of $975,000,000. The debt service fund of the Commission is used to account for all activities related to the sales tax revenue bonds debt incurred by the Commission (Table 31). The Commission's largest single expenditure is debt service. The debt agreements require the trustees to hold all debt proceeds, a portion of the sales tax revenues, and upon commencement of toll operations in FY 2016/17, the toll revenues from the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, and to segregate all funds into separate amounts. These monies are included in the restricted investments held by trustee in the capital projects funds and the debt service funds. Under the sales tax indentures, the Commission may use sales tax revenues for any lawful purpose related to the Riverside County TIP after the trustee has satisfied debt service requirements. Under the toll indentures, which include the TIFIA loan, the use of toll revenues is prescribed by a flow of funds to be administered by the trustee. In order to advance project development activities, the Commission established a commercial paper program in 2005. Periodically a portion of the commercial paper notes issued has been retired with sales tax revenue bonds including those bonds issued in 2009 (2009 Bonds) and 2010 (2010 Bonds). Table 31— Debt Service Funds FY 2012 — 2014 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Federal Reimbursements $ 2,985,700 $ 2,982,000 $ 1,372,000 $ 2,744,000 $ (238,000) -8% Investment Income 155,600 23,400 3,078.000 1,098,200 1,074,800 4593% TOTAL Revenues 3,141,300 3,005,400 4,450,000 3,842,200 836,800 28% Expenditures Professional Services 788,300 788.300 N/A Debt Service Principal Payments 6,500,000 6,800,000 6,800,000 7,100,000 300,000 4% Interest Payments 15,003,600 16,180,000 16,180,000 41,012.300 24,832,300 153% TOTAL Debt Service 21.503,600 22.980.000 22.980,000 48,112,300 25,132,300 109% TOTAL Expenditures 21,503,600 22,980,000 22,980,000 48,900,600 25,920,600 113% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (18,362,300) (19,974,600) (18,530,000) (45,058,400) (25,083,800) 126% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 35,015,700 19,665,800 16,000,000 154,023,000 134,357,200 683% Transfers Out (19.457.6001 (650,000) (10,00(1,000) (9,350,000) 1438% Net Financing Sources (Uses) 15,558,100 19,015,800 16,000,000 144,023,000 125,007,200 657% Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) (2,804,200) (958,800) (2,530,000) 98,964,600 99,923,400-10422% Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE 53,894,100 51,089,900 51,089,900 48,559,900 (2,530,000) -5% $ 51,089,900 $ 50,131,100 $ 48,559,900 $ 147,524,500 $ 97,393,400 194% Reimbursements consist of federal cash subsidy payments related to the 2010 Series B designated as build America bonds (BABs). The BABs subsidy payments reflect a reduction due to federal sequestration cuts. Investment income is significantly higher than the previous fiscal year due to higher cash reserve balances resulting from the issuance of sales tax and toll revenue bonds in FY 2013/14. Transfers in represent the primary sources of funding for the debt service funds (Chart 18) and consist of sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds from the capital projects funds and Measure A funds from the 2009 Measure A Western County Highways and Bond Financing special revenue funds. Chart 18 — Debt Service Funds Sources FY 2013/14 Federal Reimbursements 2% Transfers In 98% Investment Income 0% Debt Service fund uses (Chart 19) consist of debt service on the sales tax and toll revenue bonds as well as transfers out of $10,000,000 from excess 1989 Measure A debt reserves to the 1989 Measure A Western County Rail Capital special revenue fund for a San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL) rail project. Chart 19 — Debt Service Funds Uses FY 2013/14 Professional Services 1% Transfers Out 17% Debt Service 82% MUM 21k2rEa Riverside County Transportation Commission Afq n 1 -n L Revenues and Other Sources Total revenues and other sources are budgeted at $1,921,987,400, and consist of Measure A sales tax of $147,000,000, (or 8% of total sources); LTF sales tax of $72,500,000 (or 4% of total sources); STA revenues of $13,298,000 (or less than 1% of total sources); federal revenues of $94,389,000 (or 5% of total sources); state revenues, including vehicle registration fees, of $133,496,300 (or 7% of total sources); TUMF of $6,723,400 (or less than 1% of total sources); debt proceeds of $810,774,000 (or 42% of total sources); transfers in of $636,325,800 (or 33% of total sources) and other revenues of $7,480,900 (or less than 1% of total sources). The specific revenue funding sources are shown in Table 32. Table 32 — Revenues and Other Sources FY 2013/14 Sales Tax Department/Program MeasureA it STA Federal State Local/Other Funding Sources Management Services $ 2,800,000 $ 5 $ $ - $ 22,800 MEASURE A AND OTHER CAPITAL PROGRAMS Bond Financing 8,711,000 11,600 CETAP 3,192,500 Economic Development 1,291,000 9,300 Highways 50,298,000 18,537,600 79,283,000 4,212,900 Local Streets and Roads 44,485,000 New Corridors 11,937,000 135,400 Rail 6,581,000 75,100,000 48,914,300 506,100 Regional Arterials 9,679,000 3,227,200 REGIONAL PROGRAMS Public and Specialized Transit 9,605,000 12.500,000 13,298,000 43,400 344,100 Planning and Programming 819,000 3,700 Rail Station Maintenance/Operations 25,000 300,000 218,500 Commuter Assistance 1,613,000 683,000 - 1,804,600 Motorist Assistance 4,180,000 515,600 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Debt Proceeds Transfers In 810,774,000 636,325,800 $ 2,822,800 8,722,600 3,192,500 1,300,300 152,331,500 44,485,000 12,072,400 131,101,400 12,906,200 95,790,500 822,700 543,500 4,100,600 4,695,600 810,774,000 636,325,800 TOTAL Funding Sources $ 147,000,000 $ 72,500,000 $ 13,298,000 $ 94,389,000 $ 133,496,300 $ 1,461,304,100 $ 1,921,987,400 Revenues —Definitions and Background Measure A: Measure A is a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax that was first approved by Riverside County voters in 1988 and expired on June 30, 2009 after a 20-year term. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A through 2039. The 2009 Measure A is expected to raise more than $6.8 billion (in nominal dollars) during its lifespan. The amount raised by the Measure A levy has increased as the County and its economic base have grown during the past two decades, peaking in FY 2005/06 at $157 million. As a result of an economic slowdown, Measure A revenues decreased the subsequent four years but have since stabilized. Measure A revenues are projected to approximate $141,000,000 and $147,000,000 in FY 2012/13 and FY 2013/14, respectively. Measure A requires that all sales taxes collected may only be used for transportation purposes including administration and the construction, capital acquisition, maintenance, and operation of streets, roads, highways, including state highways and public transit systems and for related purposes. These purposes include expenditures for planning, environmental reviews, engineering and design costs, and related right of way acquisition. The Commission historically has obtained and updated Measure A revenue projections through a consultant for budget and strategic project planning purposes. The most recent economic forecast was completed in December 2012, and the Commission's sales tax services consultant provides Measure A revenue projections in connection with its quarterly sales tax analysis. Measure A revenue projections, based on such updates and other factors, for the next five fiscal years are presented in Chart 20 below. Chart 20 — Forecasted Measure A Sales Tax Revenues 2014 — 2018 $170,000,000 $165,000,000 $160,000,000 $155,000,000 $150,000,000 $145,000,000 $140,000,000 $135,000,000 2014 2015 7016 2017 2018 The following additional assumptions were used in the development of the Commission's revenue forecast for FY 2013/14: • The Inland Empire economy will continue its recovery through FY 2013/14. • The State does not change mix of items subject to the sales tax from what has been included historically. • The relative sales and property tax rates of Riverside and surrounding counties do not change from historical levels. • Internet sales will have minimal impact on revenue. The Measure A sales tax revenue projections are considered in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan financing strategy. Geographic Allocation - Riverside County is comprised of three geographic areas: Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. The percentage of Measure A revenues allocated to each of these areas based on return to source is approximately 75% for Western County, 24% for Coachella Valley, and 1% for Palo Verde Valley (Chart 21). These percentages will experience some variations from year to year based on changes in levels of taxable sales among the geographic areas. Chart 21— Geographic Allocation of Measure A Revenues Palo Verde Vailey 1% Coachella 24 Valley �Ifestern County 75% Program Allocation - The 2009 Measure A TIP defines the manner in which the sales tax revenues are to be spent, as presented in the Table 33. In Western County, public transit includes funding for specialized transit, commuter rail, intercity bus service, and commuter assistance. For the Coachella Valley, public transit includes specialized transit and public bus services. Table 33 - Program Allocation of 2009 Measure A Revenues Western County ■Band Financing - 8% ■Economic Development Incentives 1% ■HigklwYays . 3096 ■Local Street.- and Roasts - 29% ■Ne►vCorridors - 11% •Public Transit - 12% • Regional Arterials -9% Coachella Valley •Highways and Regional Arterials - 50% •Local Streets and Roads - 359E •Public Transit - 15% Pala Verde Valley •Local5treets and Roads - 100% Local streets and roads allocations to the local jurisdictions within each geographic area are based on population (in Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling units (in Coachella Valley) and taxable sales. Based on the projected Measure A sales tax revenues of $147,000,000 for FY 2013/14, the geographic and program allocations are presented in Table 34. Table 34 - Geographic Allocation of Measure A Revenues by Program FY 2013/14 Program Administration Western County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Administration $ 2,800,000 $ - $ $ $ 2,800,000 Bond Financing 8,711,000 8,711,000 Economic Development Incentives 1,291,000 1,291,000 Highways 32,907,000 32,907,000 Highways and Regional Arterials 17,391,000 17,391,000 Local Streets and Roads 31,294,000 12,173,000 1,018,000 44,485,000 New Corridors 11,937,000 - 11,937,000 Public Transit 12,582,000 5,217,000 17,799,000 Regional Arterials 9,679,000 - 9,679,000 TOTAL $ 2,800,000 $ 108,401,000 $ 34,781,000 $ 1,018,000 $ 147,000,000 Local Transportation Fund: LTF, established in state law by the TDA, is funded through a one -quarter of one cent of the State's 8.00% sales tax. The intent of the legislation was to provide a dependable revenue stream for public transportation operations. Based upon an annual projection of LTF sales taxes that considers economic forecast revenue projections prepared by a consultant, local economic factors, and monthly receipt trends, the vast majority of LTF revenue in the County is allocated to the eight public transit operators, including the Commission for its share of Metrolink operations costs. Much like Measure A revenue, LTF had increased with the growth of the County and its economy until the recent economic recession and has stabilized in recent years. Revenues received from LTF are allocated for regional and local transportation planning, program administration, SB821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities projects, public bus transit, and rail transit, including the Commission for its share related to commuter rail operations in Western County. The Commission administers these funds on behalf of the County in a special revenue fund. State Transit Assistance: STA provides additional TDA state funding of transit operations and capital for urban counties, including the County's eight public transit operators. Due to the State's budgetary issues, it suspended the STA allocations for FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/11; however, allocations were made and funded at the end of FY 2009/10. Sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels have historically generated the STA funding; however, recent legislation eliminated the tax on gasoline. State Transportation Improvement Program: Administered by Caltrans, the STIP is funded through state and federal gas tax dollars and is California's primary transportation fund. Dollars are allocated to each county based on a formula that takes into consideration population and highway centerline miles. Actual programming decisions for 75% of STIP dollars are made by local transportation agencies such as the Commission. STIP reimbursement estimates are based on budgeted expenditures for specific projects with STIP allocations approved by the CTC. Proposition 1B: In November 2006, the voters in California approved Proposition 1B, which funds various transportation programs from bonds issued by the State. Programs that are funded include Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), transit capital, STIP supplement, and Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF). CMIA and transit capital revenues for certain highway and rail projects nominated by the Commission and approved by the CTC are included in state reimbursement revenues. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Registration Fees: State law allows county SAFE agencies to impose a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations within the County to pay for call box purchases and operations; excess SAFE revenues may be used for 511 operations and as a match for FSP operations. The call boxes enable motorists to summon help should they encounter mechanical or emergency problems while on the road, whereas the 1E511 system provides real-time traffic and transit trip information available via the internet or telephone. Caltrans Freeway Service Patrol Allocations: Caltrans is the primary sponsor of the FSP and provides the majority of funding for the program, including towing services in construction zones. The State provides nearly 80% of the funding for the FSP program based on population, freeway miles, and level of congestion throughout the State. The Commission administers and implements the program along with the CHP and Caltrans. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality: The CMAQ program is federally funded and is targeted for transportation improvements in areas with air quality problems. This program pays for improvements that reduce congestion while improving air quality. The Commission has also used CMAQ dollars to include commuter assistance programs, signal interconnects, HOV lanes, and transit projects. CMAQ reimbursement estimates are based on budgeted expenditures for specific projects with CMAQ allocations. Federal Transit Administration: FTA funding is generally allocated annually by the federal government to urbanized areas and is based on calculated miles of service. On a reimbursement basis, the federal government provides funding for qualified capital investments in rail facilities, track, and vehicles. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee: In connection with the 2009 Measure A, the TUMF program was established in the Western County to provide additional funding for regional arterial projects. TUMF is administered by WRCOG. As a result of a MOU with WRCOG, the Commission will receive 48.7% of the TUMF revenues, which are divided equally between the regional arterial and CETAP programs. TUMF revenues maintained by WRCOG are allocated for regional arterial zone improvements and regional transit facilities. TUMF revenue estimates are based on monthly receipt trends and consideration of local housing and commercial construction activity in the County. Rail and Highway Licenses: The Commission owns parcels of land and right of way for highway, rail, and regional arterial projects in selected areas throughout the County. The ownership provides licensing and leasing opportunities for fiber-optic cable, advertising signs, and business tenants. The amount of funding received from the licenses and leases provides revenue to partially support the cost of owning and maintaining the Commission's land and facilities. Investment Income: The Commission has established a prudent investment policy for cash on hand that is intended to maximize return while providing absolute safeguards on principal and liquidity, as noted in Section 1. Interest earnings on the State and County investment pools are estimated at an interest rate of .25%. The earnings on funds held by the trustee for debt service and projects are assumed to be at .75%. Program Revenues and Other Sources Revenues and other financing sources for FY 2013/14 are allocated to the various Commission programs as follows: Management Services The primary funding sources for management services are Measure A allocations of $2,800,000 as well as LTF allocation transfers in of $800,000 and administration funding transfers in of $1,068,300 from TUMF, SAFE, and FSP. Other revenues include $12,000 for small business forum activities. Interest revenues in FY 2013/14 are $10,800. Bond Financing Measure A Western County revenues of $8,711,000 will be used to support bond financing costs. Interest revenues are $11,600. CETAP The Western County CETAP program will receive $3,150,000 from TUMF for development of new CETAP corridors. Additionally, other local revenues include $42,500 representing investment income. Economic Development In order to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate in the Western County area, Measure A Western County revenues of $1,291,000 will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve and construct interchanges, provide public transit linkages or stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system. Interest earnings are $9,300. Highways Funding for the highway program includes 2009 Measure A sales tax revenues of $50,298,000 for Western County highways and Coachella Valley highways and regional arterials programs. The 2009 Measure A Western County sales tax revenues will be used primarily for the SR-91, I-15, and 1-215 corridor improvements. Unexpended 1989 Measure A Western County revenues from prior years will be used on remaining projects such as SR-74 widening from 1-15 to 7ch Street and curve realignment, SR-91 HOV lanes, 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors as well as for pass -through funding to the city of Riverside for interchange improvements for SR-91 at La Sierra Avenue. Federal funds for highway projects include $400,000 in demonstration funds for the 74/215 interchange, $3,412,000 in CMAQ funds for the SR-91 HOV lanes, $3,266,000 in CMAQ funds for the SR-74 curve widening, $1,864,000 in STP funds for the I-215/Blaine Street project, $4,400 in STP funds for the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors, and $6,847,200 in demonstration funds for the 91/71 interchange improvements. Other federal funds include $2,744,000 for BABs subsidy payments related to the 2010 Bonds. State funds include STIP funding totaling $23,595,000 will be used for the 1-215 corridor improvements. The 1-215 corridor improvements on the central segment will receive $18,688,000 in Proposition 1B CMIA funds, and the SR- 91 corridor improvement project will receive $37,000,000 in Proposition 1B State Local Partnership Program (SLPP) funds. Additional local funding includes $423,400 in TUMF zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange, $450,000 in lease revenues, $60,000 in carpool violations, $34,000 in local property management revenues, and interest revenue of $3,245,500. In FY 2013/14, the Commission anticipates the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes to fund the 1-15 and 1-215 corridor improvement projects and $404,646,000, including bond premium of $61,089,000, in sales tax revenue bonds; $207,512,000, including bond premium of $7,527,000, in toll revenue bonds; and $110,000,000 in a federal TIFIA loan drawdown to fund the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Transfers in include $342,227,600 in sales tax and toll revenue bond and commercial paper proceeds to fund the 2009 Measure A projects; $16,000,000 to the Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund for Measure A Western County and Coachella Valley highways debt service; $80,000,000 of sales tax revenue bond proceeds to retire commercial paper notes; $90,362,000 of sales tax revenue bond proceeds to fund capitalized interest payments in the debt service fund; and $47,661,000 of toll revenue bond proceeds to fund a debt service reserve and capitalized interest payments in the Toll Revenue Bonds debt service fund. Local Streets and Roads Measure A allocations of $44,485,000 for the local streets and roads program are distributed to the cities and the County for local street repairs, maintenance, and construction. New Corridors To leverage local, state, and federal funding for four new transportation corridors identified through CETAP, Measure A Western County revenues of $11,937,000 will be available for environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, and construction of these new corridors. Interest revenues of $135,400 are included in local revenues. Rail Unexpended 1989 Measure A Western County revenues will be used primarily for the Perris Valley Line and other rail capital projects. The 2009 Measure A Western County's public transit program allocated $6,581,000 for rail. Federal FTA funding for the Perris Valley Line project consists of $51,200,000 from Small Starts and $23,900,000 from CMAQ. State Proposition 1B transit allocations of $4,574,300 will fund the Perris Transit Center, station security, and station rehabilitation projects. STIP revenues of $43,240,000 will fund the Perris Valley Line. State Transportation Enhancements (TE) revenues of $1,100,000 will fund the Riverside station pedestrian improvement project. Local revenues include investment income of $94,100, reimbursements of $353,000 related to the Perris Transit Center, and property management revenues of $59,000. Transfers in of $250,000 and $10,000,000 from STA and excess reserves, respectively, are for a rail project. Regional Arterials The Western County regional arterial program will receive funds from Measure A and TUMF in the amounts of $9,679,000 and $3,150,000, respectively. The new TUMF revenues along with unexpended TUMF revenues from prior years will be the primary source of funding TUMF regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment. Other local revenues also consist of investment income of $77,200. Transfers in consist of $32,319,500 from 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterials and TUMF CETAP as a match for TUMF regional arterial projects and $659,100 from 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads, in accordance with the 2009 Measure A, related to a city not eligible to receive those funds. Public and Specialized Transit LTF sales tax revenues of $72,500,000 are allocated primarily for public bus and rail transit operations and capital in the County. A small portion of these revenues is used for LTF planning and administration allocations as well as SB821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities grants. STA allocations of $13,298,000 are allocated to the County's public transit operators. For the FY 2013/14 budget, unexpended LTF and STA revenues from prior years will also be used to fund transit operations as well as bicycle and pedestrian facilities grants. Under the 2009 Measure A, public transit funding of $9,605,000 has been allocated for Western County specialized transit and intercity bus services and Coachella Valley specialized and public transit services. Federal revenues consist of $43,400 in FTA Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Section 5316 funding. Local revenues represent investment income of $344,100. Planning and Programming Transportation planning studies are funded with a LTF off -the -top allocation transfer in of $2,175,000, or three percent of estimated LTF revenues. A LTF allocation transfer in of $2,600,000 will fund grade separation projects for the cities of Corona, Riverside and Jurupa Valley and the County. STIP in the amount of $819,000 will fund PPM activities of the Commission and CVAG. Local revenues consist of investment income of $3,700. Rail Station Maintenance and Operations Rail operations, which include Metrolink operating and capital contributions, station maintenance, and support, will be funded with LTF allocation transfers in of $8,253,300. A federal grant of $25,000 will fund interns. Proposition 1B will fund $300,000 for a commuter rail feasibility study in the Coachella Valley. In addition to interest revenues of $5,700, local revenues include $200,000 in reimbursements primarily from SCRRA for security costs, $5,000 for Metrolink violator citations, and $7,800 for miscellaneous vending machine revenues. Commuter Assistance The Commuter Assistance program will receive funding of $1,613,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County public transit to assist in implementing services to commuters and employers in promoting use of alternate modes of transportation in Western County. The Commission will also receive CMAQ funds of $648,000 to support the commuter assistance program and JARC revenues of $35,000 for a ridesharing project in the Coachella Valley. Local revenues consist of other agency reimbursements of $1,771,000 for support of the San Bernardino commuter assistance program and regional ridematching as well as investment income of $33,600. The 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund will transfer $1,000,000 to the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund for reimbursement of the park and ride facility at the Perris Transit Center. Motorist Assistance SAFE is funded from $1,500,000 in revenues received through DMV registration fees, while Caltrans will allocate $1,700,000 in State highway account funds to cover regular FSP services and $980,000 for special FSP services required for construction projects. The Commission will also receive local revenues of $492,000 to support SANBAG's share of the 1E511 system operations. Local revenues represent investment income of $13,000 and cost recoveries of $10,600 from responsible parties related to call box knockdowns. The State's FSP contribution is matched with an operating transfer in from SAFE of $916,400; the 2009 Measure A Western County highway program will transfer in $33,600 for construction FSP services related to the 1-215 corridor (central segment) improvements project. 4 Riverside County Transportation Commission tIl'A g 4 tk,hInliOGI fl� o� Commission Debt The Commission's current debt under the 2009 Measure A has been incurred for highway, regional arterial, economic development, and local streets and roads projects for which title usually vests or, upon completion, will vest with Ca!trans or local jurisdictions for ongoing operations and maintenance. Future Measure A sales taxes are pledged to cover Measure A debt service payments on the sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper notes. In FY 2013/14 the Commission will issue additional sales tax bonds as well as issue toll revenue bonds (2013 Toll Bonds) and obtain a federal TIFIA loan to be repaid from toll revenues generated on the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, which is part of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. The Commission will also issue commercial paper notes for the I-15 and 1-215 corridor improvement projects. Since the financed projects are not assets of the Commission for which the Commission will have operating responsibilities, except for the intangible rights to operate the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, future operating costs related to these projects cannot be determined and are not applicable. However, for toll and rail assets, operating budget impacts are considered in future project development. Table 35 presents a summary of the anticipated changes in the Commission's debt during FY 2013/14. Table 35 — Changes in Commission Debt Projected Balance July 1, 2013 Additions Accretion (Reductions) Projected Balance June 30, 2014 Commercial Paper 2009 Sales Tax Bonds 2010 Sales Tax Bonds 2013 Sales Tax Bonds 2013 Toll Bonds TIFIA Loan $ 80,000,000 $ 161,400,000 150,000,000 20,000,000 $ (80,000,000) (7,100,000) 404, 646,000 207,512,000 110,000,000 1,053,000 $ 391,400,000 $ 742,158,000 $ (86,047,000) $ 20,000,000 154,300,000 150,000,000 404,646,000 208,565,000 110,000,000 $ 1,047,511,000 The 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and 2013 Toll Bonds are expected to be issued at a premium of $61,089,000 and $7,527,000, respectively. Commercial Paper In March 2005 the Commission established a commercial paper program to advance project development and land and right of way acquisition under the 2009 Measure A TIP. In October 2010 the Commission reduced the commercial paper program to $120,000,000. Maturities of commercial paper notes are rolled over to new issuances of commercial paper. Regarding the commercial paper notes, the Commission currently maintains a P-1 and an A-1+ rating from Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) and Standard and Poor's Rating Service (S&P), respectively. Interest payments are made from available commercial paper proceeds or sales tax revenues. The Commission projects the issuance of $80,000,000 in commercial paper notes in FY 2012/13; those notes will be retired in July 2013 with the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. The Commission anticipates the issuance of $20,000,000 in commercial paper notes during FY 2013/14 for capital project funding for a projected outstanding amount of $20,000,000 at June 30, 2014. The Commission will pay $100,000 in estimated commercial paper interest payments during the year. Commercial paper debt service expenditures are reflected in the Commercial Paper capital projects fund. The Commission has irrevocable direct draw letters of credit and reimbursement agreements with The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch (Bank of Tokyo), and Union Bank, N.A. (Union Bank) as credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper notes. The letters of credit in the amount of $60,750,000 for each series of notes expire in October 2014; however, the Commission anticipates reducing the commercial paper program to $60,000,000 following the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and terminating one of the letters of credit and reimbursement agreements. The costs for the liquidity support are reflected in the 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing special revenue fund. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds As a means to achieve a greater level of interest rate stability, the Commission entered into two interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $185,000,000 at a fixed rate for 20 years effective October 2009; the counterparties pay the Commission a floating rate equal to 67% of the one -month London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR. The counterparty for the first swap ($100,000,000 notional amount) at a fixed rate of 3.679% is Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America), and the counterparty for the second swap ($85,000,000 notional amount) at a fixed of 3.206% is Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank). As of June 30, 2014, the projected notional amounts for the Bank of America and Deutsche Bank swaps are $83,400,000 and $70,900,000, respectively. In connection with the commencement of the interest rate swaps in October 2009, the Commission issued $185,000,000 in variable rate sales tax revenue bonds to retire outstanding commercial paper notes, refund bonds issued in 2008, fund a portion of the debt service reserve, and pay costs of issuance. The 2009 Bonds are secured by standby bond purchase agreements (SBPAs) with JP Morgan Chase Bank (JPMorgan), which expire in September 2014. In connection with the extension of the original SBPAs with JPMorgan in September 2011, the Commission obtained the release of the debt service reserve for capital project funding purposes. The costs for these liquidity facilities are accounted for in the 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing special revenue fund. For FY 2013/14, the Commission has budgeted debt service principal and interest payments of $7,100,000 and $6,381,800, respectively. In November 2010 the Commission issued $37,630,000 in fixed rate tax-exempt bonds (Series A Tax -Exempt) and $112,370,000 in fixed rate taxable bonds (Series B Taxable) designated as BABs under American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The aggregate amount issued of $150,000,000 for the 2010 Bonds was used to retire approximately $103,300,000 of outstanding commercial paper notes, provide funds for 2009 Measure A Western County capital projects, and pay costs of issuance. A portion of the BABs were designated as recovery zone economic development bonds (RZEDBs). The Commission expects to receive a cash subsidy from the United States Treasury equal to 35% of the interest payable on the BABs or 45% of the interest payable on the Series B Taxable bonds additionally designated as RZEDBs; however, in FY 2012/13, the BABs subsidy was reduced approximately 8% due to federal sequestration cuts. If sequestration continues, the FY 2013/14 BABs subsidy is expected to also be reduced by approximately 5%. Estimated net debt service payments for the 2010 Bonds in FY 2013/14 are $0 for principal and $9,530,500 for interest payments, which are offset by the $2,744,000 cash subsidy payment. In connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement financing to be completed in July 2013, the Commission anticipates the issuance of $404,646,000 in additional sales tax revenue bonds at a premium of $61,089,000. The proceeds of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds will be used to pay a portion of the costs of the SR-91 corridor improvement project, retire approximately $80,000,000 in outstanding commercial paper notes, pay capitalized interest through January 2018, and pay costs of issuance. These 2013 Bonds have maturity dates through June 30, 2039. Estimated debt service payments for the 2013 Bonds in FY 2013/14 are $0 for principal and $18,800,000 for interest payments. The Commission has received long-term debt ratings of Aa2, AA+, and AA from Moody's, S&P, and Fitch Ratings (Fitch), respectively on its currently outstanding sales tax revenue bonds. These ratings are expected to be reaffirmed with the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. Toll Revenue Bonds and TIFIA Loan Toll revenue bonds of $207,512,000 will consist of current interest bonds (CIBs) and capital appreciation bonds (CABS) and include a premium of $7,527,000. The CIBs, which are expected to comprise approximately 65% of the toll revenue bonds issued, are projected to have maturity dates through June 2043, while the CABS will have projected maturity dates through June 2041 at the accreted value. In July 2010 the Commission authorized the issuance of up to $900,000,000 in toll revenue bonds in anticipation of the financing requirements for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Estimated debt service payments for the 2013 Toll Bonds in FY 2013/14 are $0 for principal and $6,300,000 for interest payments. In April 2012 the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) announced that the Commission received an invitation to the 2012 TIFIA program, which provided the final puzzle piece needed for the full funding of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. During FY 2012/13, the Commission submitted a TIFIA loan application and obtained approval for a maximum loan of $451,000,000. Based on current project cost estimates and finance model assumptions, the Commission anticipates a TIFIA loan in the amount of $416,255,000. The TIFIA loan provides low cost subordinate financing secured by toll revenues to be generated by the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. Considered "patient financing", interest repayment will be deferred for up to five years from substantial completion of the project and principal repayment will be sculpted around the revenue stream supporting the senior debt toll revenue bonds. The maximum repayment term of the TIFIA loan is 35 years from substantial completion, which would approximate January 2052 for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. The Commission anticipates the receipt of investment grade ratings for the 2013 Toll Bonds from S&P and Fitch and for the TIFIA loan from Fitch. Debt Capacity Analysis The Commission is legally prohibited from issuing additional sales tax revenue debt if its debt coverage ratio is less than 1.5 to 1 on all senior sales tax revenue debt. The Commission has adopted a higher standard of 2 to 1 as part of its debt management policy. As Chart 22 and Table 36 indicate, the Commission has successfully met its policy standard for sales tax revenue debt issued under the 2009 Measure A, even in a declining sales tax revenue environment. The 1989 Measure A related debt consistently exceeded the Commission's standard, and coverage for the 2009 Measure A related debt of 4.0 is anticipated for FY 2013/14. Any coverage less than 2 to 1 would necessitate using other program funding to cover all debt service expenditures. Chart 22 — Measure A Debt Capacity Analysis $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $- FY 2012/13 Table 36 — Measure A Debt Capacity Analysis Sales Tax Revenues Senior Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Senior Debt Long -Term Debt Rating Commercial Paper Rating FY 2013/14 FY 12/13 al Senior Debt Service ■ Available Revenues FY 13/14 $ $ 141,000,000 19,997,600 7.1 Aa2/AA+/AA P-1/A-1+ $ 147,000,000 $ 39,068,300 4.0 Aa2/AA+/AA P-1/A-1+ In connection with the toll -supported debt consisting of the 2013 Toll Bonds as senior debt and federal TIFIA loan as subordinate debt, debt service coverages of 1.5 to 1 and 1.3 to 1 will be required on the senior debt and subordinate debt, respectively. Aggregate Debt Service Schedule for Sales Tax Bonds Debt service requirements for the sales tax revenue bonds are based on amortization schedules for the 2009 Bonds; 2010 Bonds, including the BABs cash subsidy payments; and the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. Since commercial paper is expected to be refinanced with sales tax revenue bonds, debt service requirements for commercial paper are not included in Table 37; however, the debt service interest expenditures in FY 2013/14 for the commercial paper notes are estimated at $100,000. Table 37 — Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039 Total Principal $ 7,100,000 7,400,000 7,800,000 8,100,000 29,973,000 107,588,000 135,996,000 162,479,000 203,150,000 46,460,000 Interest Subsidy Payments 34,712,326 $ (2,744,000) $ 35,865,526 (2,982,113) 35,588,926 (2,982,113) 35,268,526 (2,982,113) 34,950,226 (2,982,113) 158,482,230 (14,910,563) 131,686,430 (14,910,563) 97,375,052 (14,897,936) 49,103,516 (9,470,800) 2,647,899 (550,754) Net Debt Service 39,068,326 40,283,413 40,406,813 40,386,413 61,941,113 251,159,666 252,771,866 244,956,116 242,782,716 48,557,144 $ 716,046,000 $ 615,680,656 $ (69,413,068) $ 1,262,313,588 Outstanding Debt and Debt Service Requirements as of June 30, 2014 Under the provisions of the 2009 Measure A, the Commission has the authority to issue bonds subject to a bond debt limitation of $975,000,000, reflecting an increase from the original authorization of $500,000,000 as a result of the voter approval of Measure K in November 2010. The following is a summary of debt issued and secured by 2009 Measure A revenues, receipt of which began in FY 2009/10: 2005 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A and Series B: In February 2005, the Commission authorized a $200,000,000 commercial paper program. In March 2005, the Commission established the program for $185,000,000 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A and B. In October 2010, the program was reduced to $120,000,000. The repayment of principal and interest on the commercial paper notes is secured by irrevocable direct draw letters of credit issued by Bank of Tokyo and Union Bank, and the Measure A sales tax revenues secure such repayment. Maturities of the commercial paper notes may range from one to 270 days, and interest rates are variable and dependent on current market conditions. The note agreements require the trustee to hold all note proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indenture. 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds {Limited Tax Bonds), Series A, B, and c, In October 2009, the Commission issued $185,000,000 principal amount of serial bonds to refinance the 2008 bonds, retire a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the commercial paper notes and a portion of accrued interest on the notes, and fund a reserve fund. In September 2011, the reserve fund was released to fund project costs in connection with the extension of the SBPAs by JPMorgan. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $6,500,000 to $13,700,000 on various dates through June 1, 2029 with variable interest rates set on a weekly basis. The 2009 Bonds are integrated with the interest rate swaps, thereby creating synthetic fixed rate debt. The 2009 Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2009 Bonds are summarized in Table 38. Table 38 — 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029 Total Principal $ 7,100,000 7,400,000 7,800,000 8,100,000 8,500,000 48, 500,000 60,300,000 13,700,000 Interest $ 6,381,800 6,103,000 5,826,400 5,506,000 5,187,700 20,633,600 10,212,800 579,000 Total Debt Service $ 13,481,800 13,503,000 13,626,400 13,606,000 13,687,700 69,133,600 70,512,800 14,279,000 $ 161,400,000 $ 60,430,300 $ 221,830,300 2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bands (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax -Exempt and Series B Taxable: In November 2010, the Commission issued $150,000,000 principal amount of serial bonds to retire all of the outstanding principal amount of the commercial paper notes and fund project costs. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $12,105,000 to $17,980,000 on various dates from June 1, 2030 through June 1, 2039. Interest rates for the Series A Tax -Exempt and Series B Taxable bonds are 5% and 6.807%, respectively. The Commission expects to receive cash subsidies from the U.S. Treasury related to the Series B Taxable bonds. The 2010 Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements, net of subsidy payments for the 2010 Bonds are summarized in Table 39. Table 39 — 2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal 2014 $ $ 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 - 2029-2033 52,170,000 2034-2038 79,850,000 2039 17,980,000 Interest 9,530,526 9,530,526 9,530,526 9,530,526 9,530,526 47,652,630 47,652,630 43,889,052 22,887,516 1,223,899 Subsidy $ (2,744,000) (2,982,113) (2,982,113) (2,982,113) (2,982,113) (14,910,563) (14,910,563) (14,897,936) (9,470,800) (550,754) Net Debt Service 6,786,526 6,548,413 6,548,413 6,548,413 6,548,413 32,742,066 32,742,066 81,161,116 93,266,716 18,653,144 Total $ 150,000,000 $ 210,958,356 (69,413,068) 291,545,288 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax -Exempt: In July 2013, the Commission expects to issue $404,646,000 principal amount of serial bonds at a premium of $61,089,000 to retire all of the outstanding principal amount of commercial paper notes, fund a portion of the SR-91 corridor improvement project costs, pay capitalized interest during construction, and pay cost of issuance. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $10,512,000 to $28,479,000 on various dates through June 1, 2039. Interest rate estimated is 5%. The 2013 Sales Tax Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds are summarized in Table 40. Table 40 — 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039 Total Principal Interest $ 18,800,000 - 20,232,000 20,232,000 20,232,000 21,473,000 20,232,000 59,088,000 90,196,000 75,696,000 73,821,000 96,609,000 52,907,000 123,300,000 26,216,000 28,480,000 1,424,000 Total Debt Service 18,800,000 20,232,000 20,232,000 20,232,000 41,705,000 149, 284,000 149,517,000 149,516,000 149,516,000 29,904,000 $ 404,646,000 $ 344,292,000 $ 748,938,000 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Current Interest Obligation): In July 2013, the Commission expects to issue $134,883,000 principal amount of serial CIBs to fund a portion of the 5R-91 corridor improvement project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an Operations and Maintenance Fund, and pay costs of issuance. The CIBs mature in installments ranging from $2,307,000 to $39,836,000 on various dates from June 1, 2022 through June 1, 2043. Interest rates range from 3.00%to 5.00%. The Toll Revenue Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and segregate funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the Toll Revenue bonds are summarized in Table 41. Table 41— 2013 Toll Revenue Current Interest Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039-2043 Total Principal 8,840,000 48,701,000 2,307,000 75,035,000 Interest Total Debt Service $ 6,300,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 33,541,000 27,479,000 19,336,000 19,336,000 16,999,000 $ 6,300,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 6,744,000 42,381,000 76,180,000 19,336,000 21,643,000 92,034,000 $ 134,883,000 $ 149,967,000 $ 284,850,000 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Capital Appreciation Obligation): In July 2013, the Commission expects to issue $72,629,000 principal amount of serial CABS to fund a portion of the SR-91 corridor improvement project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an Operations and Maintenance Fund, and pay costs of issuance. The CASs will not pay current interest as interest will be compounded commencing December 2013 semiannually and paid at maturity. Therefore, the CABS will increase in value, or accrete, by the accumulation of such compounded interest from its initial principal amount to the maturity value in installments ranging from $7,071,000 to $32,508,000 on various dates from June 1, 2029 through June 1, 2047. Interest rates range from 1.45% to 5.92%. The Toll Revenue Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and segregate funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the Toll Revenue bonds are summarized in Table 42. Table 42 — 2013 Toll Revenue Capital Appreciation Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Accreted Interest Total Debt Service 2029-2033 25,730,000 42,054,000 67,784,000 2034-2038 28,321,000 76,330,000 104,651,000 2039-2041 18,578,000 70,808,000 89,386,000 Total $ 72,629,000 $ 189,192,000 $ 261,821,000 TIFIA Loan Agreement: In July 2013, the Commission anticipates the execution of a $416,255,000 TIFIA loan for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. In FY 2013/14, the Commission is expected to draw $110,000,000 principal amount of TIFIA loan proceeds for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. During construction and for a period of up to five years following substantial completion, interest is compounded and added to the initial TIFIA loan. The TIFIA loan requires mandatory debt service payments at a minimum and scheduled debt service payments to the extent additional funds are available. TIFIA debt service payments are expected to commence in June 2022, which is five years after substantial completion of the SR-91 corridor improvement project, through June 30, 2051. The interest rate of the TIFIA loan is estimated at 3.50%. Based on a projected draw schedule, the following is an estimate of mandatory and scheduled debt service. Table 43 —TIFIA Debt Service Requirements F Mandatory Scheduled iscal Year Principal Interest Total Interest Total 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039-2043 2044-2048 2049-2051 Total Accretion Initial Loan $ - $ 147,000 196,000 196,000 275,172,000 234,868,000 510,579,000 (94,324,000) $ 416,255,000 $ 3,584,000 19,420,000 73,982,000 89,311,000 89, 278,000 71,845,000 16,859,000 364,279,000 $ 3,584,000 19,420,000 74,129,000 89, 507,000 89,474,000 347,017,000 251,727,000 $ 874,858,000 $ 32,157,000 69,956,000 15,335,000 $ 117,448,000 $ 35,741,000 89,376,000 89,464,000 89,507,000 89,474,000 347,017,000 251,727,000 $ 992,306,000 The allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds to the 2009 Measure A programs is presented in Chart 23. Chart 23 — Program Long -Term Debt Local Streets and Roads 0% Highways and Regional Arterials 1489E The allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds by the benefiting geographic area is presented in Chart 24. Chart 24 — Long -Term Debt by Geographic Area Palo Verde Coachella Valley �� //"Valiey a35 2% Western County 98% Outstanding Debt and Legal Debt Margin at June 30, 2014 A summary of the Commission's outstanding debt secured by Measure A sales tax revenues and related legal debt margin projected at June 30, 2014 is presented in Table 44: Table 44 — Legal Debt Margin 2009 Measure A Authorized Sales Tax Revenue Debt $ 975,000,000 2005 Commercial Paper Notes 20,000,000 2009 Bonds 154,300,000 2010 Bonds 150,000,000 2013 Bonds 404,646,000 Total Outstanding Debt 728,946,000 Legal Debt Margin $ 246,054,000 lin ilinna 0......_ Riverside County Transportation Conanission (11)tAiA[d di alo 4h Table 45 — Budget Comparison by Department FY 2012 — 2014 FY W12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget Projected Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Total Revenues Expenditures Management Services: Executive Management Administration Legislative Affairs and Communications Finance Total Management Services Regional Programs: Planning and Programming Services Rail Maintenance and Operations Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assistance Total Regional Programs Capital Project Development and Delivery Debt Service: Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance Total Debt Service Total Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) $ 134,984,300 66,556,700 13,487,500 28,097,000 21,411, 300 2,008,600 8,116,400 1,430,100 4,308,300 280,400,200 214,700 1,238,100 927,900 5,333,900 7,714,600 3,399,900 20,202,600 53,158,100 3,157,600 3,846,300 83,764,500 181,174,500 46,523,900 15,008,700 61,532,600 334,186.200 $ 141,000,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 73,151,900 17,917,800 2,688,700 7,557,300 882,800 7,265,900 334,176,900 283,200 1,502,200 1,244,300 4.999.500 8,029,200 4,994,100 14,553,300 84,811,200 4,038,800 4,848,000 113,245,400 $ 141,000,000 69,500,000 14,212,500 40,949,200 21,306,500 2,589,400 7,268,200 493,500 3,986,300 301,305,600 237,800 1,196,000 953,200 4,547,000 6,934,000 3,538,600 11,564,300 59,406,500 4,197,400 4,727,600 83,434,400 377,477,800 252,703,600 126,800,000 16,613,000 143,413,000 642.165.400 6,800,000 16,190,600 FY 13/14 Dollar Budget Change $ 147,000,000 $ 6,000,000 72,500,000 3,000,000 13,298,000 (914,500) 94,389,000 21,237,100 133, 496, 300 115, 578, 500 2,954,400 265,700 6,723,400 (833,900) 500,000 (382,800) 4.026.500 (3,239,400) 474,887,600 140, 710, 700 258,900 1,865,400 1,248,400 5.212,700 8,585,400 5,845,000 15,485,600 106,803,900 4,411,700 5.464.600 138,010,800 (24,300) 363,200 4,100 213,200 556,200 850,900 932,300 21,992,700 372,900 616,600 24,765,400 750,844,700 373,366,900 87,100,000 41,112,300 7,500,000 (39,700,000) 24,499,300 7,500.000 22,990,600 135,712,300 (7,700,700) 366.062,600 1,033,153,200 390,987,800 (53,786,000) (307,988,500) (64,757,000) (558,265,600) (250,277,100) 123,977,200 (123,977,200) 40,000,000 328,118,600 (328,118,600) 1,220,172,000 40.000.000 1,220,172,000 125,536,100 (125,536,100) 80,000,000 80.000,000 636,325,800 (636,325,800) 700,774,000 110.000.000 308, 207, 200 (308,207,200) (519,398,000) 110.000.000 810,774,000 (409,398.0001 Percent Change 4% 4% -6% 29% 645% 10% -11% -43% -45% 42% -9% 24% 0% 4% 7% 17% 6% 26% 9% 13% 22% 99% -31% 147% N/A -5% 61 ^. 81% 94% 94% -43% N/A (13,786,000) 912,183,500 15,243,000 252,508,400 (659,675,100) -72% Beginning Fund Balance 589,364,600 575,578,600 575,578,600 590,821,600 15,243,000 3% Ending Fund Balance $ 575,578,600 $ 1,487,762,100 $ 590,821,600 $ 843,330,000 $ (644,432,100) -43% Riverside Comity Transportation Commission tItiltm 61 � 1amla A )ribg Executive Management Mission Statement: "To maintain the highest level of achievement and professionalism possible while managing the activities of the Commission with a small staff complemented with consultants, to effectuate sound transportation policies and legislation compatible with environmental standards." Chart 25 — Executive Management Support Costs 22% Professional Coats 41% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 37% Executive Management has a budget of $258,900 (Table 46) for oversight of all Commission functions. The 20% decrease in salaries and benefits reflects the allocation of FTEs to other programs. Professional costs of $105,000 include legal fees and consulting services. Support costs include various membership dues and staff -related travel costs of $57,200. Table 46 — Executive Management Expenditure Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 105,200 $ 120,600 $ 83,000 $ 96,700 $ (23,900) -20% Professional Costs Legal Services 69,900 65,000 61,100 65,000 0% Professional Services - General 40,000 40,000 40,000 0% Total Professional Costs 69,900 105,000 101,100 105,000 0% Support Costs 39,600 57,600 53,700 57,200 (400) -1% TOTAL Executive Management $ 214,700 $ 283,200 $ 237,800 $ 258,900 $ (24,300) -9% Executive Management Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.01 Deputy Executive Director 0.07 0.15 Executive Director 0.19 0.19 FTE 0.26 0.35 0.01 0.10 0.15 0.26 Department Budget Overview Department Description The Executive Director is responsible for and provides strong leadership in developing and implementing new strategies at the local, regional, and statewide levels to assure delivery of transportation improvements and programs throughout the County. Furthermore, Executive Management is committed to fostering a positive and supportive work environment for staff that emphasizes quality work and encourages teamwork and open communication, with a commitment to serving the public. This is accomplished through a productive and collaborative effort with the members of the Commission and the oversight of the Commission's Executive Committee. Key Assumptions • The Executive Director will play a prominent role with external audiences with an emphasis on working with Congress, the California Legislature, Riverside County business organizations, and Southern California transportation agencies and local governments regarding advancing transportation policy in California. Policy concerns include the need for ongoing transportation investment, flexibility in project delivery methods, streamlining of environmental processes and a renewed focus of the connection between transportation projects and the overall quality of life in Riverside County. • Project delivery will be a top priority in FY 2013/14 with the major focus on initiating construction on the SR- 91 corridor improvement project through Corona. The overall budget for the project exceeds $1 billion and it will be the Commission's most significant project in its history. Construction is expected to begin in December 2013, and it will add two lanes of added capacity to Riverside County's most congested freeway corridor. The project's use of express lanes will also herald a new era of toll financing and operations. • The focus on project delivery will also be seen in the advancement of public transit with construction of the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension. • Additional ongoing projects under construction will include the 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector, SR- 91 HOV lane project, 1-215 corridor improvement project central segment, and the 1-215 bi-county project. Construction will begin on the SR-74 curve widening project near Hemet. • Yet another component of project delivery will include the need to complete the environmental review process on a number of high -profile projects including the Mid County Parkway and the SR-79 realignment. • The advancement of construction on a number of projects will require a requisite increase in public outreach to the media and local governments as well as the need for watchful oversight to make the most of lower construction and right of way costs. • The development of the Perris Valley Line project will mark Riverside County's first major rail expansion in more than 14 years and will require a significant public outreach effort during construction. • A renewed emphasis, as part of a regionwide effort, will be placed on working with local governments and stakeholders to advance active transportation projects such as bicycling, walking and transit use. Accomplishments FY 2012/13 saw extraordinary accomplishments at the Commission, placing it in the top tier of California transportation organizations. In several areas, the Commission stood by itself in successful advocacy, innovation, and leadership. • Completed construction on the 1-215 south in Murrieta which added a lane in each direction of the freeway. • Immediately after the widening of the 1-215 south, broke ground and initiated construction on the 1-215 central project between Nuevo Road and Scott Road in the communities of Menifee and Perris. • Awarded a $633 million design -build contract for the widening of SR-91 and extension of the existing 91 Express Lanes through Corona. • Obtained and negotiated a TIFIA loan amounting to one-third of the eligible TIFIA costs of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. The Commission was one of only five agencies throughout the nation to receive TIFIA funding in the April 2012 selections. " C o n t i n u e d t o i m p l e m e n t c o m p o n e n t s o f t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y D e l i v e r y P l a n . " I s s u e d a r e v i s e d D r a f t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t f o r t h e M i d C o u n t y P a r k w a y p r o j e c t . " G u i d e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n t h r o u g h a n u n c e r t a i n e c o n o m i c e n v i r o n m e n t w i t h c o s t s s a v i n g s a n d s u c c e s s f u l a d h e r e n c e t o l i m i t s o n s a l a r i e s a n d a d m i n i s t r a t i v e e x p e n d i t u r e s . " P a r t n e r e d w i t h S A N B A G t o l a u n c h t h e 1 - 2 1 5 b i - c o u n t y p r o j e c t w h i c h a d d s a H O V l a n e i n e a c h d i r e c t i o n o f t h e I - 2 1 5 f r o m S R - 6 0 t o 1 - 1 0 . " C o n t i n u e d t o f u n d t h e a c q u i s i t i o n o f n e e d e d h a b i t a t f o r t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y M S H C P a s o u t l i n e d i n t h e M e a s u r e A E x p e n d i t u r e P l a n . " C o m p l e t e d p r o j e c t w o r k t o e n s u r e t h e a l l o c a t i o n o f P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B T C I F w h i c h h a s l e d t o t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n u m b e r o f r a i l r o a d g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n s . T w o o f t h e 1 2 T C I F p r o j e c t s h a v e b e e n c o m p l e t e d ( C o l u m b i a A v e n u e a n d M a g n o l i a A v e n u e / U n i o n P a c i f i c ) ; t h r e e p r o j e c t s a r e u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n ( I o w a A v e n u e , S t r e e t e r A v e n u e a n d t h e I - 2 1 5 / V a n B u r e n i n t e r c h a n g e ) ; a n d s e v e n p r o j e c t s w i l l s t a r t c o n s t r u c t i o n b y D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 3 ( A u t o C e n t e r D r i v e , A v e n u e 5 2 , A v e n u e 5 6 , C l a y S t r e e t , M a g n o l i a A v e n u e / B u r l i n g t o n N o r t h e r n S a n t a F e ( B N S F ) , R i v e r s i d e A v e n u e a n d S u n s e t A v e n u e ) . " A d v o c a t e d f o r a n d s u c c e s s f u l l y o b t a i n e d i n c l u s i o n o f t h e P a s s A r e a a n d C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y R a i l S e r v i c e i n t o t h e S t a t e I n t e r c i t y R a i l P l a n . M a j o r I n i t i a t i v e s F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 w i l l b e a y e a r o f c o n s t a n t a c t i v i t y a n d w i l l f e a t u r e e f f o r t s t o l a u n c h a n u m b e r o f p r o j e c t s . C h i e f a m o n g t h e m w i l l b e t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t t h r o u g h C o r o n a , a $ 1 . 3 b i l l i o n d o l l a r e f f o r t t h a t w i l l a d d g e n e r a l p u r p o s e a n d e x p r e s s l a n e s t o a 1 0 - m i l e s t r e t c h o f o n e o f s o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a ' s m o s t c o n g e s t e d f r e e w a y s . T h i s w i l l b e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ' s l a r g e s t t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t a n d o n e o f t h e m o s t v a l u a b l e , i n t e r m s o f p r o j e c t c o s t , i n t h e e n t i r e s t a t e . A l o n g w i t h t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t , t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s e r v e a s t h e l e a d a g e n c y o n c o n s t r u c t i o n f o r t h e w i d e n i n g o f t h e 1 - 2 1 5 c e n t r a l p r o j e c t , t h e S R - 7 4 c u r v e w i d e n i n g , a n d t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e . T h e C o m m i s s i o n , t h r o u g h i t s p a r t n e r s h i p w i t h C a l t r a n s i s f u n d i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n t o a d d H O V l a n e s o n S R - 9 1 t h r o u g h d o w n t o w n R i v e r s i d e a n d t h e 6 0 / 2 1 5 E a s t J u n c t i o n H O V l a n e s c o n n e c t o r p r o j e c t . Y e t a n o t h e r p a r t n e r s h i p c a n b e s e e n w i t h S A N B A G i n t h e w i d e n i n g o f t h e 1 - 2 1 5 k n o w n a s t h e b i - c o u n t y p r o j e c t . T h i s e f f o r t a d d s a H O V l a n e i n e a c h d i r e c t i o n t o t h e 1 - 2 1 5 b e t w e e n S R - 6 0 a n d 1 - 1 0 . W h i l e t h e f o c u s w i l l c e r t a i n l y b e o n c o n s t r u c t i o n , p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t w o r k c o n t i n u e s w i t h t h e c i r c u l a t i o n o f d r a f t e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t s f o r t h e M i d C o u n t y P a r k w a y a n d S R - 7 9 r e a l i g n m e n t p r o j e c t s . I n t e r m s o f a d v a n c i n g p o l i c y , a m a j o r c o n c e r n i n m o v i n g f o r w a r d i s t h e s t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a ' s f i n a n c i a l p o s i t i o n a n d c o m m i t m e n t t o f u n d i n g i n f r a s t r u c t u r e a n d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l c o n t i n u e t o t a k e a n a g g r e s s i v e a n d a c t i v e r o l e i n a d v o c a t i n g f o r S t a t e i n v e s t m e n t s i n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . T h e C o m m i s s i o n i s a n a c t i v e m e m b e r o f t h e S e l f - H e l p C o u n t i e s C o a l i t i o n ( S H C C ) a n d M o b i l i t y 2 1 , a n d a m a j o r f o c u s w i l l b e p l a c e d o n a d v o c a c y f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i n t h e S t a t e b u d g e t . F e d e r a l f u n d i n g i s a l s o a n i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s f u t u r e , a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l a d v o c a t e s t r o n g l y f o r t h e a p p r o v a l o f a f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n b i l l . C o n g r e s s ' s p r i o r i t i e s w i l l n e e d t o i n c l u d e f u n d i n g f o r P o s i t i v e T r a i n C o n t r o l a n d f o r g o o d s m o v e m e n t a n d f r e i g h t - r e l a t e d p r o j e c t s i n S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . I n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , g o o d s m o v e m e n t i n v e s t m e n t s w i l l c o n t i n u e t o f o c u s o n t h e n e e d t o c o m p l e t e h i g h w a y / r a i l g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n p r o j e c t s . T h e s u c c e s s o f m a n y o f t h e s e e f f o r t s w i l l r e l y o n p r o a c t i v e e x t e r n a l c o m m u n i c a t i o n s . M e d i a r e l a t i o n s w i l l c o n t i n u e t o b e a p r i o r i t y , a n d p r e s s r e l e a s e s w i l l r e m a i n a m a j o r e f f o r t a l o n g w i t h s o c i a l m e d i a a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s O n t h e M o v e m o n t h l y n e w s l e t t e r a n d a n n u a l r e p o r t . A n e x p a n d i n g a n d s y s t e m a t i c o u t r e a c h t o b u s i n e s s a n d c i v i c g r o u p s , f o c u s i n g o n C o m m i s s i o n e f f o r t s i n t e r m s o f f u n d i n g , c o n s t r u c t i o n , a n d s e r v i c e s , w i l l b e t h e c e n t r a l f e a t u r e o f t h e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s p r o g r a m . R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y h a s a l s o s e e n a m a j o r c h a n g e i n i t s f e d e r a l a n d s t a t e l e g i s l a t i v e d e l e g a t i o n s w h i c h w i l l r e q u i r e a c o n c e r t e d o u t r e a c h e f f o r t t o n e w r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o n l o c a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i s s u e s . W h i l e a c t i v e l y p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n a l l o f t h e s e m a j o r e n d e a v o r s , t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r w i l l m a i n t a i n a n d i m p r o v e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e e f f i c i e n c y a n d f i s c a l l y s o u n d p r a c t i c e s c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . W i t h a t o t a l o f 4 6 b u d g e t e d s t a f f p o s i t i o n s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n o r g a n i z a t i o n r e m a i n s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h C o m m i s s i o n d i r e c t i o n . The Commission must continue to be competitive in the employment market and retain capable staff as well as attract high quality applicants. Staff training and development will continue, enabling our small and dedicated staff to enhance skills, productivity, and value. Our goal is to maintain the most effective mid -sized transportation agency in California. Department Goals Focus on timely and effective completion of capital projects. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Begin construction and serve as lead agency on the SR-91 corridor improvement project in Corona. • Serve as the lead agency for the construction of the 1-215 corridor improvement projects. • Work closely with Ca!trans on construction of the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors project in Moreno Valley as well as the SR-91 HOV lanes project in downtown Riverside and 1-215 bi-county project. • Ensure effective communication with the public regarding construction and project details throughout the County. • Embark on construction for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension. Maximize funding for transportation improvements in Riverside County through legislative advocacy. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Implement the Commission's early development project priorities outlined in the recent Commission workshops, focusing on the first ten years of the 2009 Measure A, which will include an emphasis on project development for the SR-91 corridor improvement project and the Perris Valley Line. • Place an emphasis on initiating federally authorized and funded projects included within the new federal transportation bill and the Commission's ongoing project priorities. • Advocate federal appropriations for current projects and regional efforts to reduce the community impacts of rail goods movement. • Continue to advocate for federal investment in freight and goods movement infrastructure with the goal of mitigating community impacts while increasing capacity and local job creation and economic development. • Continue implementation of Transit Vision while addressing short- and long-term funding constraints. Support regional transportation solutions in cooperation with surrounding counties that are of benefit to Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Continue work on grade separation and rail capacity projects funded through the TCIF as well as those called for in the Commission's $561 million Grade Separation Plan. • Work with neighboring counties regarding corridor improvements on SR-91, 1-15 and 1-215. • Maintain an effective working relationship with the agencies that comprise Metrolink to ensure that Riverside County commuter rail needs are served in an efficient, effective, and safe manner. • Partner with SANBAG to enhance and publicize the 1E511 system and work with agencies in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles counties to provide effective, regional 511 traveler information services. • Play an active role in the implementation of revamping the implementation of intercity rail and commuter rail service in the Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) corridor. • Be an active participant in discussions involving high-speed rail —especially concerning connectivity investments in the overall rail system in Southern California. • Advocate for and take an active effort for additional intercity rail service to the Coachella Valley and the Pass Area. Maintain effective working relationships with Commissioners to strengthen and expand the Commission's leadership in transportation policy decision -making at all levels of government. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Facilitate Commissioner participation at the regional, state, and federal levels to raise the interests of the Commission and seek favorable action. • Continue regular communication between the Executive Director, senior staff and the Commissioners. • Continue collaborative efforts with member agency staff regarding local priorities and funding challenges. • Work with other levels of local government such as the County Transportation Department, County Health Department, and local universities on quality of life issues that are connected to transportation such as air quality and the environment. • Provide assistance to Commissioners who serve on outside boards such as SCAG and Metrolink to assist their efforts to represent Riverside County. While maintaining a relatively small staff, promote the Commission's effectiveness by improving and developing staff skills, using state-of-the-art working tools, and fostering an environment that encourages and rewards individual and team effort. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue to maintain a well -documented employee appraisal process that provides clear, understandable, and measurable performance criteria for all employees. • Maintain and encourage staff morale and effectiveness. • Retain quality staff as the economy improves. Develop the framework for a Commission culture that enhances productivity, encourages regular and open communication among staff, and promotes the mutual achievement of individual and organizational goals and objectives. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Conduct a semi-annual review of organization accomplishments as measured against planned objectives to determine progress in meeting those objectives and action steps needed. • Facilitate open communications and coordination between management, professional staff, and support staff through regular meetings. Executive Management Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Expenditures $358,560,200 $334,186,200 $366,062,600 $1,033,153,200 Staffing levels 41 40 42 46 Administration costs as percentage of expenditures 3% 2.31% 1.89% .83% Administration Mission Statement: "To provide quality and efficient services to the Board of Commissioners, staff, and external customers and to comply with applicable federal and state requirements." Chart 26 - Administration 110 Capital Outlay 21% Salaries an Benefits 34% Support Cvstsk 34% a Pmfessiareal Casts 11% Expenditures As noted in Table 47, the Administration Department's total budget is $1,865,400 for office operations including management of office space, lease, and equipment; records; Commission and committee meetings; and special events as well as for the clerk of the board and human resources functions. Salaries and benefits expenditures of $628,600 reflect an increase of 37% for FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $207,600 cover various services including, but not limited to, Commissioners' per diem, legal fees, and consultant and other professional services. Support costs of $644,200 cover administrative overhead including office maintenance; information technology updates, support, and maintenance; and recruitments. Capital outlay of $385,000 reflects an increase due to information technology equipment upgrades. Table 47 - Administration Expenditure Detail Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Commissioner Per Diem Legal Services Professional Services - General Total Professional Costs Support Costs Capital Outlay Debt Service TOTAL Administration FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Dollar Percent Change Change $ 434,000 $ 460,303 $ 398,200 $ 628,600 $ 168,300 37% 64,000 158,400 16,600 239,000 547,700 17,400 25,200 $ 1,263,300 $ 65,000 18,900 176,800 260,700 641,200 140,030 1,502,200 $ 65,000 65,000 0% 17,000 22,000 3,100 16% 59,000 120,600 (56,200) -32% 141,000 207,600 (53,100) -20% 601,800 644,200 3,000 0% 55,000 385,000 245,003 175% N/A 1,196,000 $ 1,865,400 $ 363,200 24% Administration Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Accounting Supervisor 0.01 0.01 0.01 Accounting Technician 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Assistant 2.13 1.38 1.30 Executive Director 0.00 0.00 0.00 Finance Manager/Controller 0.17 0.25 0.30 Human Resources Administrator 0.00 0.00 1.00 Office and Board Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.95 0.95 0.95 Staff Analyst 0.00 0.00 0.00 FTE 5.26 4.59 5.56 Department Budget Overview - Office Operations Department Description Office Operations oversees the daily maintenance needs of the Commission's office facility and staff; manages information technology and records management systems; oversees the office lease; purchases office supplies and equipment; posts public notices on the website and local newspaper and notices of project completion; maintains a safe working environment for Commission board members, staff, and consultants; and provides support services. Office Operations continues to operate with a small staff of six consisting of the Office and Board Services Manager, Senior Administrative Assistant, three Administrative Assistants, and Senior Office Assistant. Key Assumptions • Support is provided to 46 full-time Commission staff. • Requests for proposals and project notices of completion are posted in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. • Information technology systems are upgraded and maintained to ensure efficiency. • An accurate and efficient records management system is maintained. • Requests for public records are responded to in accordance with the California Public Records Act. Accomplishments • Updated the web page in a timely manner for the postings of public notices. • Maintained efficient information technology infrastructure. • Maintained the electronic records management system to ensure accurate and efficient processing of incoming and outgoing correspondence and documents. • Maintained a disaster recovery plan to ensure uninterrupted Commission operations. • Responded to public records requests in accordance with the California Public Records Act. Major Initiatives The Commission will continue to maintain a robust electronic records management system. Achieving greater efficiencies and strengthening the Commission's records management processes and procedures, the system pertains to the management, storage, and accessibility of the Commission's actions and documents and the retention capability for incoming and internally created records. Office Operations will continue to provide high quality support services to the Board and to internal and external customers by providing a work environment that enhances the overall mission of the Commission. Department Goal — Office Operations Ensure quality service that demonstrates responsiveness and flexibility and provides services at the most reasonable cost. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Support 46 full-time staff. • Provide accessibility to meeting agendas, legal notices, requests for proposal, and employment opportunities through the Commission's web page. • Continue to improve administrative efficiency through automation of records processing. • Provide a safe working environment with the maintenance of an injury and illness prevention program. • Post legal notices and requests for proposals on the Commission's web page and in the newspapers on a timely basis. • Provide office supplies, equipment, and services consistent with intended quality and capabilities at the most advantageous price afforded in the market. • Manage the Commission's information technology systems. Department Budget Overview — Clerk of the Board Department Description The Clerk of the Board provides support services to the Board of Commissioners and its alternates and for Commission and committee meetings. It serves as an important resource for the Commission and has the responsibility for recording, publishing, preserving, and filing meeting proceedings of documents acted upon by the Commission and its committees; posting legal notices; processing claims against the Commission; fulfilling requirements of the Commission and the committees as it relates to the Conflict of Interest Code; serving as the Filing Officer for Economic Interest and Campaign Disclosure statements and legal claims against the Commission; coordinating Commission special events and meetings; and performing all duties required by law, rules, or order of the Board. As such, this department has a direct link and responsibility to serving local taxpayers and the public while supporting the actions of the Commission. The need to be accountable to the public at large is further amplified by the need to comply with federal and state law requiring prompt responses to California Public Records Act requests. Key Assumptions • Staff support and meeting services are provided to 34 Commissioners and their alternates, the Commission, four established committees, and a number of ad hoc committees. • Monthly agenda packets and supporting documents are published and distributed in accordance with the Brown Act. • Officers and members of the Commission are kept informed by providing them with the most current and accurate data to assist them and facilitate their decision making responsibilities. • Frequent communication with Commissioners continues to provide news and updates on Commission items and transportation -related meetings. • Available technology is used to provide simplified access of agenda items and Commission actions to the public, local agencies, and staff. Accomplishments • Updated the web page and the bulletin board for the agenda, minutes, and supporting documents. • Posted legal notices in local newspapers and on the Commission's web page. • Regularly advised officers and members of the Commission and their staff on changes to Commission meetings and other transportation -related meetings. " A r r a n g e d C o m m i s s i o n a n d c o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g s a n d s p e c i a l e v e n t s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . " P r o c e s s e d a n d t r a n s m i t t e d C o m m i s s i o n - a p p r o v e d r e s o l u t i o n s t o a p p r o p r i a t e a g e n c i e s i n a t i m e l y m a n n e r . M a j o r I n i t i a t i v e s E a c h y e a r , l o c a l a g e n c i e s m a k e c h a n g e s t o t h e i r a p p o i n t m e n t s r e g a r d i n g t h e i r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o n t h e C o m m i s s i o n . S t a f f w i l l c o n t i n u e t o m a k e e v e r y e f f o r t t o e n s u r e t h a t t h e n e w l y a p p o i n t e d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s , a s w e l l a s t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e s t a f f , a r e a w a r e o f o p e r a t i o n a l p o l i c i e s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d o t h e r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n - r e l a t e d m e e t i n g s . T h e r e w i l l b e c o n t i n u e d e m p h a s i s o n t h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f e l e c t r o n i c m a i l w i t h C o m m i s s i o n e r s f o r m o r e e f f i c i e n t c o m m u n i c a t i o n s . C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d s t a f f w i l l c o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e h i g h q u a l i t y s u p p o r t s e r v i c e s t o t h e B o a r d . S t a f f w i l l a l s o c o n t i n u e t o u p d a t e t e c h n o l o g y t o s t r e a m l i n e p r o c e s s e s a n d p r o c e d u r e s f o r e a s i e r a c c e s s t o C o m m i s s i o n a c t i o n s , m i n u t e s , r e s o l u t i o n s , a n d o r d i n a n c e s , i n c l u d i n g e l e c t r o n i c a g e n d a d i s t r i b u t i o n . D e p a r t m e n t G o a l s C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d E n s u r e c o o r d i n a t i o n a n d d o c u m e n t a t i o n o f C o m m i s s i o n a n d c o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g s a n d p r o v i d e p u b l i c a c c e s s i b i l i t y t o a g e n d a i t e m s a s r e q u i r e d b y s t a t e r e g u l a t i o n s . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : C o m m u n i c a t i o n s , F i n a n c i a l & A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) O b j e c t i v e s : " P r o v i d e a c c u r a t e , h i g h q u a l i t y a g e n d a p a c k e t s f o r C o m m i s s i o n a n d c o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g s . " C o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e s u p p o r t t o C o m m i s s i o n m e m b e r s , s t a f f , a n d a t t e n d e e s o f C o m m i s s i o n a n d c o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g s . " P o s t m e e t i n g a g e n d a s a n d s u p p o r t i n g d o c u m e n t s i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h B r o w n A c t r e q u i r e m e n t s . " M a i n t a i n a n a c c u r a t e l i s t o f C o m m i s s i o n e r s a n d a l t e r n a t e s a n d s u b m i t m e m b e r s h i p r o s t e r c h a n g e s t o t h e S e c r e t a r y o f S t a t e . " M a i n t a i n a n d f i l e a l l C o m m i s s i o n a n d c o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g s a n d o f f i c i a l r e c o r d s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . " P e r f o r m a l l d u t i e s w i t h i n m a n d a t e d d e a d l i n e s . " M a i n t a i n a n d p r o m o t e g o o d C o m m i s s i o n a n d s t a f f r e l a t i o n s . F a c i l i t a t e a c c e s s o f i n f o r m a t i o n t o C o m m i s s i o n r e c o r d s . ( P o l i c y G o a l : C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e s : " C o n t i n u e t o r e s p o n d t o r e q u e s t s f o r r e c o r d s a n d i n f o r m a t i o n o n a t i m e l y b a s i s a n d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h s t a t e l a w . " C o n t i n u e t o i m p r o v e t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s r e c o r d k e e p i n g p r a c t i c e s b y u p d a t i n g t h e e l e c t r o n i c r e c o r d s m a n a g e m e n t s y s t e m . " M a i n t a i n C o m m i s s i o n a g r e e m e n t s , a m e n d m e n t s , M O U s , r e s o l u t i o n s , a n d o r d i n a n c e s . " M a i n t a i n a c e n t r a l i z e d d a t a b a s e f o r C o m m i s s i o n e r s , a g e n c i e s , a n d c o n s u l t a n t c o n t a c t i n f o r m a t i o n . " C o o r d i n a t e s p e c i a l a c t i v i t i e s , m e e t i n g s , e v e n t s , a n d c o n f e r e n c e s a s r e q u e s t e d b y t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n . D e p a r t m e n t B u d g e t O v e r v i e w H u m a n R e s o u r c e s D e p a r t m e n t D e s c r i p t i o n H u m a n R e s o u r c e s r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s i n c l u d e a d m i n i s t e r i n g t h e r e c r u i t m e n t , s e l e c t i o n , a n d a p p r a i s a l p r o c e s s ; u p d a t i n g a n d c o n d u c t i n g a b i e n n i a l s u r v e y o f c o m p a r a b l e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a n d s a l a r i e s a n d b e n e f i t s ; m a i n t a i n i n g p e r s o n n e l p o l i c i e s a n d p r o c e d u r e s ; a n d s c h e d u l i n g p e r i o d i c s e s s i o n s f o r s t a f f t o r e v i e w b e n e f i t s a n d p e r s o n n e l r u l e s a n d f o r s u p e r v i s o r s t o r e v i e w t h e p e r f o r m a n c e e v a l u a t i o n p r o c e s s . Key Assumptions • The use of consultant services for Human Resources administration is maximized. • A Human Resources Administrator will be hired to manage human resources responsibilities on a full-time basis. • The assessment of Human Resources practices and procedures will continue. • Continuous improvement in communication with employees regarding Human Resources information will be an ongoing process. • Compliance with state and federal labor law regulations is achieved. Accomplishments • Completed the biennial classification and compensation study. • Adopted a resolution in response to the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), requiring existing employees to begin paying an equal share of the normal pension costs. Effective July 11, 2013 existing employees will pay 3% toward the normal pension costs and thereafter will pay an additional 3% in FY 2014/15 and 2% in FY 2015/16 for a total annual normal pension cost contribution of 8%, offset by a corresponding salary increase. • Implemented PEPRA that creates a new defined benefit formula of 2% at age 62 for all new members hired as of January 1, 2013. • Provided the annual Benefit Statement to all employees. • Regularly provided information to employees on changes to health insurance, 401(a) defined contribution, and 457 deferred compensation plans and the personnel policies and procedures manual through the Commission's intranet and quarterly employee newsletter. • Recruited and filled two intern and six full-time positions. • Held training sessions on violence in the workplace, harassment -free workplace, and drug -free workplace. • Disclosed employees' compensation on the Commission's website in compliance with the State Controller's Office and CaIPERS. Major Initiatives Human Resources focuses on managing employees and consists of a framework of activities and practices that support and develop a motivated workforce while at the same time complying with legislation and regulations that govern the employer/employee relationship. Staff will use written position descriptions and performance expectations in order to give each employee a clear and consistent understanding of what is expected. Additionally, staff will utilize qualified human resources consultants to assist in establishing good human resources management practices, based on policies to establish parameters for fair and consistent decision -making, and to institute good workplace practices. The Commission's practice is to conduct a classification and compensation review program review every two years to ensure fair compensation is established to attract and retain the most qualified employees. After the postponement of the biennial classification and compensation review program in 2009 due to the slowdown in the economy and declining sales tax revenues, the Commission reinstituted the biennial classification and compensation review program at the request of the Executive Committee in response to the implementation of the PEPRA provisions. The Commission will provide a one-time 3% cost of living adjustment to offset the employees' contribution to the normal pension costs and up to a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases based on the performance of staff in FY 2013/14. Department Goals — Human Resources Administer human resources policies, procedures, and programs in order to align personnel laws and the Commission's policies with continuous improvement principles. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Review and update personnel policies and procedures to comply with federal and state requirements. • Provide information to enhance the employee's knowledge of current personnel policies and procedures in various forms including electronic access, workshops, and printed information. • Ensure that employee personnel records are updated timely for various personnel actions. Continue to employ and recruit a dynamic and talented workforce. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Maintain a compensation program that ensures internal equity and external competitiveness within the pay structure for Commission employees. • Exercise care in making high -quality, diverse appointments. Develop people to be their best in order to meet the needs of the organization. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Build and maintain an effective performance system to include timely performance evaluations, personal development, and a supportive work environment. • Provide appropriate and timely training to meet the demands of the organization. • Foster teamwork through cooperative efforts and support for shared success. Understand and consistently deliver excellent customer service to all employees. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objective: • Focus on "employee as customer" and consistently strive to exceed expectations by supporting and maintaining individual respect, appreciation, management accessibility, and communication. Improve the quality of the work culture. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Develop and maintain a safe working environment. • Maintain a proactive employee relations process. • Promote a work/family balance. • Recognize and reward individual contributions, innovation, and learning from experience. Administration Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Employee rules/Benefits review sessions held 1 1 1 2 Recruitments 6 7 6 5 Positions filled 6 6 6 5 Legal notices 18 13 24 26 Commission/Committee/Ad Hoc meetings 50 56 72 73 Commissioners supported (including alternates) 61 61 61 61 Staff supported: Regular full-time i Temporary/Seasonal 41 1 40 1 42 2 46 2 Legislative Affairs and Communications Mission Statement: "To improve the mobility of Riverside County residents by working through the legislative process and by maintaining effective interagency relationships. This is supported by facilitating interactive communications with the public and transportation stakeholders through various outreach and media efforts." Chart 27 — Legislative Affairs and Communications 5uFpa 15% Salaries and Benefits 41% Professional Costs 44% .J Expenditures The Legislative Affairs and Communications Department has a total budget of $1,248,400 (Table 48). Salaries and benefits have increased 28% as a result of FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $552,500 include legislative advocacy, graphic design, and website updates. Support costs of $189,200 are comparable to last year's budget. Table 48 — Legislative Affairs and Communications Expenditure Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 347,100 $ 395,000 $ 351,200 $ 506,700 $ 111,700 28% Professional Costs Legal Services 2,100 2,500 1,000 2,500 0% Professional Services - General 423,300 658,800 455,200 550,000 (108,800) -17% Total Professional Costs 425,400 661,300 456,200 552,500 (108,800) -16% Support Costs 155,400 188,000 145,800 189,200 1,200 1% TOTAL Legislative Affairs and Communications $ 927,900 $ 1,244,300 $ 953,200 $ 1,248,400 $ 4,100 0% Legislative Affairs and Communications Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.20 0.19 Community Relations Manager 0.08 0.15 Deputy Executive Director 0.66 0.65 Executive Director 0.00 0.05 Goods Movement Manager 0.00 0.05 Government Relations Manager 1.00 0.85 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.03 FTE 1.94 1.97 Department Budget Overview Department Description Legislative Affairs 0.24 0.10 0.71 0.01 0.30 1.00 0.00 2.36 Transportation issues and system enhancements affect a number of jurisdictions and stakeholders. Through proactive participation, the Commission is able to play a stronger leadership role at all levels of government to advance its interests and policy goals. The importance of this is magnified when the Commission is seeking changes in law or needs legislative authorization to move forward with a specific project. The Commission's Legislative Affairs efforts focus on taking full advantage of opportunities at both the federal and state levels when there is a potential impact to Commission programs. In doing so, the Commission maintains its role as a major legislative force and a statewide leader on a broad range of issues affecting transportation policy such as project delivery and financing. This requires the establishment and maintenance of ongoing communication with Riverside County's legislative delegations in Washington and Sacramento. The Commission accomplishes this via a combined effort that includes Commissioners, staff, and legislative consultants in the two capitals. The effort also requires working with other transportation agencies throughout the State in order to collaborate on issues of mutual concern. This cooperation takes place in a number of forums including a monthly meeting of transportation commission chief executive officers, a legislative roundtable of regional transportation advocates, Mobility 21, SHCC, and Coalition for America's Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC). In the November 2012 election, Riverside County voters sent several new legislators to Washington and Sacramento. These new elected officials bring with them new staff members and new perspectives on government policy, requiring the Commission's legislative affairs team to increase its effort to educate and partner with its delegation in both capitals. Establishing these relationships will be a major focus for the year. A chief concern continuing through FY 2013/14 is modernization of CHIA. Potential changes to this law could have significant benefits to the Commission's ability to deliver needed projects that improve mobility and benefit the environment. In Washington, it will be important to monitor the implementation of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) and prepare for the next surface transportation authorization in 2014. In terms of federal action on specific projects, the Commission was selected by the U.S. DOT to apply for a TIFIA loan in April 2012 related to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. After submitting the TIFIA application in August 2012, the Commission obtained approval in February 2013 for a TIFIA loan of up to $451,000,000. The execution of this federal loan is anticipated in July 2013. The Commission's project was one of 26 letters of interest submitted for a total request exceeding $13 billion, and it was one of only five selected to submit a TIFIA loan application. The Commission will also seek to elevate its policy presence on matters pertaining to the tolling operations. In recent years, federal and state legislators have given significant attention to how tolling on highways is regulated. With the SR-91 and 1-15 corridor improvement projects on the near -term horizon, the Commission has a newfound interest in participating in these discussions. Communications The Commission is committed to communicating with and educating a broad arena of interested parties on the roles and responsibilities of the agency. An emphasis will continue to be placed on informing Riverside County residents and businesses about transportation projects and services and maintaining open communication with other transportation stakeholders. Various forms of media and communication tools are used in these outreach efforts with the overall objectives to provide accurate, informative, and easily accessible information; facilitate public participation in the Commission processes; and increase interagency coordination and cooperation. The Deputy Executive Director is responsible for communications with the news media and prepares text for Commission materials, presentations, and speeches. Along with the Executive Director, the Deputy Executive Director, Community Relations Manager, and individual project managers actively participate in public presentations at the local, regional, and state levels to represent the Commission's interests. Strong relationships with the news media are very important to ensure that the public is well informed regarding the Commission's progress in determining funding priorities, designing infrastructure improvements, and constructing projects. There are many points throughout these processes in which the public can and should play a role in shaping the future of the County's transportation network. Key Assumptions ■ The Government Relations Manager will oversee legislative affairs work efforts with guidance from the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. • The annual report to the public will be distributed throughout the County and will be posted on the Commission's website in a printable format. • The On the Move newsletter will be published and distributed electronically and posted on the Commission website. • The Speakers Bureau effort will continue to seek local community opportunities to expand outreach regarding the Commission's activities. • The Commission's website will be updated and refreshed on a regular basis. • Additional communications tools and opportunities will be explored for incorporation into the ongoing program to help build public awareness of Commission activities including radio, television, social media outlets such as Twitter, and the internet. • The Commission will continue to take a leadership role in formulating a countywide direction on federal transportation policy. • Public outreach will take a heightened role as project development activities accelerate on projects such as the SR-91 corridor improvement, 1-215 corridor improvements, the 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector, SR-91 HOV lanes, Perris Valley Line, Mid County Parkway, and SR-79 realignment. • Goods movement will remain a key policy priority for the Commission, and there will be an emphasis to ensure that Riverside County receives significant funding for this need from state and federal governments. ■ The Commission will monitor and influence the development of the national freight network required by MAP-21. • Government Relations will assist the Commission in taking a leadership role in Sacramento on modernization of CEQA. Accomplishments ■ Submitted application for and obtained approval for a TIFIA loan from the U.S. DOT for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • Published a four -page annual report supplement in three major newspapers — The Press Enterprise, Desert Sun, and The Californian — and posted the supplement on the Commission's website in a printable format. • Met with and provided SR-91 corridor improvement project tour for Senator Dianne Feinstein. • Continued to update the functionality of the Commission's website. • Continued effective relationships with the news media resulting in informative coverage regarding local and regional transportation issues and Measure A project delivery. • Provided extensive public outreach support as part of the project development process for the Mid County Parkway, Perris Valley Line, SR-91 corridor improvement, 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector, and 1-215 corridor improvement projects. • Conducted multiple public meetings as part of the environmental review process for a number of efforts including the Perris Valley Line, 1-215 corridor improvement, SR-91 corridor improvement, 74/215 interchange, and 91/71 interchange projects. ■ Supported the Rail Department in the development of various marketing materials and advertisements including weekend and holiday train services. ■ Continued to take a leadership role and collaborate with neighboring counties, local business leaders, Mobility 21, SHCC and CAGTC on many transportation policy issues in Sacramento and Washington. ■ Continued work with the Southern California National Freight Gateway collaboration to foster cooperation, coordination, and collaboration to facilitate the movement of goods through Southern California. • Developed new collateral materials for an overview of the Commission's programs and projects as well as construction projects planned for Western County, which are often distributed at public events. • Developed and distributed a Transportation Quick Reference Guide for Riverside County. The guide was designed for elected, appointed, and community leaders with an emphasis on Commission projects and funding issues. • Improved and maintained the Commission's photo library to assist with documenting the project delivery progress of the voter -approved Measure A tax program. The photo library has been used to develop PowerPoint presentations, information brochures, and TIFIA loan submissions. ■ Maintained a presence on the social networking site Twitter which can be accessed at http://twitter.com/RCTC. • Held widely attended events for the completion of the 1-215 South Project and the groundbreaking of the 1-215 Central Project. • Conducted a Small Business Forum on contracting opportunities with the Commission that attracted approximately 200 people. ■ Took an active role in providing comments and ensuring that Riverside County projects were included in the RTP. ■ Continued to provide a Commissioner -orientation program that bolsters Commissioner knowledge and participation regarding Commission projects and activities and was presented to every new Commissioner. Major Initiatives Legislative Affairs The Commission will continue to advocate strategically and effectively on the policy issues described above in Washington and Sacramento, utilizing its contract advocacy teams, coalitions, and partnerships. The Commission will seek to build on its recent successes in both capitals and continue to maintain a strong presence as a respected, knowledgeable and effective resource to policy leaders and decision -makers. Communications The Commission provides information to the public through various channels including: 1) participation at public meetings, chambers of commerce, industry associations, and service clubs; 2) production and provision of resource materials and fact sheets; 3) maintenance and enhancement of the Commission's website; and 4) development of newspaper press releases, radio and television interviews, and cable television spots. The Commission's largest publication effort to provide widespread understanding of its projects and expenditures is its four -page annual report which has been published in three area newspapers throughout the County and is now posted on the Commission's website in a printable format. A continuing emphasis will be placed on providing communications support to major project development efforts including the Perris Valley Line, the Mid County Parkway, the SR-91, 1-15, and the 1-215 projects. The need for proactive public communication and outreach remains important, as the Commission continues to move forward with the delivery of the Measure A work program. This is an area of emphasis, as the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan places the Commission in a high -profile role to deliver large-scale highway projects. This will require additional contact with the public by the Community Relations Manager. The Commission's outreach will include a proactive effort to work closely with various media formats such as print, radio, internet, and television to increase their understanding and interest in transportation issues and to generate a higher level of media coverage. Toward that end, opportunities will be identified for live or taped interviews and presentations that speak to local residents and employers and their questions concerning transportation issues. Appropriate forums may include city council meetings, local cable television, and radio. Broad distribution of On the Move, an e-mail newsletter highlighting actions of the Commission and emerging topics, will continue as part of the Commission's communications. Efforts will continue to update and expand the Commission's contact database including e-mail addresses in order to support distribution of the Commission's public information materials. New Commissioner -orientation meetings will be provided by the Executive Director, Deputy Executive Director, and Clerk of the Board in individualized settings. To supplement individual Commissioner meetings with the Executive Director, continuing education opportunities at the small group level will also be provided to Commissioners that focus on timely issues. Department Goals Foster the Commission's full involvement and input in a broad range of local, regional, state, and federal government settings. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Participate in the SHCC; California Transit Association; Southern California Legislative Roundtable; League of Cities; Mobility 21; CAGTC; Southern California National Freight Gateway Collaboration; regional, state and federal transportation agencies; and community/business organizations to influence funding and policy decisions that impact Riverside County. • Maintain a leadership role in local and regional transportation venues related to project development efforts and current and emerging issues. • Provide leadership to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) to ensure that funding for air quality -related transportation improvements is fully distributed to Riverside County jurisdictions. • Work with SCAG, WRCOG, and CVAG to monitor and respond to transportation issues involving the implementation of SB375 on smart growth planning. • Coordinate with other local agencies and business interests to modernize and reform CEQA to improve project delivery and deter frivolous lawsuits and challenges that delay projects. " C o n t i n u e r e g u l a r m e e t i n g s a t t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r / C h i e f E x e c u t i v e O f f i c e r l e v e l w i t h t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a g e n c i e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e r e g i o n . " C o n d u c t o n g o i n g m e e t i n g s a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n w i t h t r a n s i t p r o v i d e r s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . I m p l e m e n t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l l e g i s l a t i v e p r o g r a m t o m a x i m i z e f l e x i b i l i t y i n t h e u s e o f e x i s t i n g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n r e v e n u e s b y s u p p o r t i n g l e g i s l a t i o n t o p r o t e c t a n d i n c r e a s e c u r r e n t f u n d i n g l e v e l s , e n s u r i n g a n e q u i t a b l e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f a v a i l a b l e r e s o u r c e s , s t r e a m l i n i n g a d m i n i s t r a t i v e p r o c e d u r e s t o r e d u c e c o s t s a n d t i m e o f p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d a c c e l e r a t i n g t h e a l l o c a t i o n a n d u s e o f e x i s t i n g r e s o u r c e s . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y , G o o d s M o v e m e n t ) O b j e c t i v e s : " C o o r d i n a t e l e g i s l a t i v e a c t i v i t i e s o f f e d e r a l a n d s t a t e l e g i s l a t i v e c o n s u l t a n t s a n d o b t a i n m o n t h l y r e p o r t s o n a c t i v i t i e s p e r f o r m e d . " W o r k w i t h b o a r d m e m b e r s t o e s t a b l i s h p o l i c y p o s i t i o n s , r e v i e w a n d a n a l y z e l e g i s l a t i o n , v i s i t w i t h e l e c t e d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s i n S a c r a m e n t o a n d W a s h i n g t o n , d r a f t l e g i s l a t i o n , a n d m a i n t a i n s t r o n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h k e y d e c i s i o n - m a k e r s . " P r o v i d e r e g u l a r u p d a t e s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e g a r d i n g s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l g o v e r n m e n t i s s u e s . " E f f e c t i v e l y r e p r e s e n t t h e C o m m i s s i o n b e f o r e t h e s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l l e g i s l a t i v e b o d i e s , C T C , a n d o t h e r a g e n c i e s i n f u n d i n g , p r o g r a m m i n g , a n d p o l i c y m a t t e r s . " C o n v e n e m e e t i n g s w i t h s t a t e , f e d e r a l , a n d l e g i s l a t i v e s t a f f m e m b e r s . S u p p o r t t h e c o n t i n u i n g e d u c a t i o n o f C o m m i s s i o n e r s t o i n c r e a s e t h e i r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n - r e l a t e d i s s u e s a t l o c a l , s t a t e , a n d f e d e r a l l e v e l s t o m a x i m i z e t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n a f f e c t i n g p o l i c y a n d f u n d i n g a c t i o n s . ( P o l i c y G o a l : C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e s : " P r o v i d e o r i e n t a t i o n t r a i n i n g f o r n e w C o m m i s s i o n e r s . " P r o d u c e a n d d i s t r i b u t e a m o n t h l y e - m a i l n e w s l e t t e r , O n t h e M o v e , h i g h l i g h t i n g a c t i o n s a n d a c t i v i t i e s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . " P r o v i d e p e r i o d i c e d u c a t i o n a l w o r k s h o p s o r s t u d y s e s s i o n s f o r C o m m i s s i o n e r s . " P r o v i d e o n - g o i n g u p - d a t e s t o C o m m i s s i o n e r s , v i a e - m a i l , o n t o p i c a l i s s u e s i n c l u d i n g p r o j e c t s , f u n d i n g a n d n e w s w o r t h y e v e n t s i m p a c t i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n . D e v e l o p a n d m a i n t a i n a n i n f o r m a t i o n p r o g r a m w h i c h e d u c a t e s t h e p u b l i c a n d o t h e r s t a k e h o l d e r s o n t h e r o l e s a n d r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n a s i t r e l a t e s t o a c c o m p l i s h m e n t s a c h i e v e d t h r o u g h M e a s u r e A o r o t h e r f u n d i n g s o u r c e s c o n t r o l l e d o r a d m i n i s t e r e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : C o m m u n i c a t i o n s , F i n a n c i a l & A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) O b j e c t i v e s : " E x p a n d , m a i n t a i n , a n d u p d a t e i n f o r m a t i o n o n t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s w e b s i t e i n c l u d i n g i n d i v i d u a l p r o j e c t w e b s i t e s a n d s o c i a l m e d i a . " A n n u a l l y p r o d u c e a r e p o r t t h a t i n f o r m s t h e p u b l i c r e g a r d i n g M e a s u r e A p r o g r e s s a n d o t h e r C o m m i s s i o n p r o g r a m s . " I s s u e n e w s r e l e a s e s t o t h e l o c a l m e d i a a n n o u n c i n g s i g n i f i c a n t a c h i e v e m e n t s a n d p r o v i d i n g i n f o r m a t i o n o n C o m m i s s i o n a c t i o n s a n d a c t i v i t i e s . " D e v e l o p a n d m a i n t a i n o p e n l i n e s o f c o m m u n i c a t i o n w i t h n e w s r e p o r t e r s t o f a c i l i t a t e a d e q u a t e a n d a c c u r a t e n e w s c o v e r a g e . " S c h e d u l e p e r i o d i c m e d i a i n f o r m a t i o n b r i e f i n g s o r n e w s c o n f e r e n c e s w h e n a p a r t i c u l a r i s s u e w a r r a n t s i t . " E x p a n d t h e s t o c k o f v i d e o f o o t a g e f o r u s e i n p r o d u c t i o n o f c a b l e t e l e v i s i o n s p o t s t h a t f e a t u r e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s f u n d e d a n d / o r i m p l e m e n t e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . " P e r i o d i c a l l y u s e c a b l e t e l e v i s i o n a n d o t h e r f o r m s o f m e d i a s u c h a s i n t e r n e t s i t e s a n d b l o g s , i f a p p r o p r i a t e , t o c o m m u n i c a t e i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e p u b l i c r e g a r d i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a c t i v i t i e s a n d s e r v i c e s . " C o o r d i n a t e a n d o v e r s e e m e s s a g e c o n t e n t o f a l l C o m m i s s i o n p u b l i c a t i o n s a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n s t o p r o v i d e u n i f o r m i t y o f m e s s a g e a n d d i r e c t i o n . " S u p p o r t t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d p l a n n i n g o f p r o j e c t s i n r e g a r d t o p u b l i c o u t r e a c h a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n e f f o r t s . " R e q u i r e t h e u s e o f M e a s u r e A p r o j e c t / p r o g r a m s i g n a g e b y f u n d i n g r e c i p i e n t s t o i n c r e a s e p u b l i c a w a r e n e s s o f M e a s u r e A a c c o m p l i s h m e n t s . " C o n t i n u e t o a d m i n i s t e r a n d e x p a n d t h e u s e o f t h e S p e a k e r s B u r e a u t o r e a c h c o m m u n i t y m e m b e r s i n s e r v i c e a n d o t h e r o r g a n i z a t i o n s . " M o n i t o r a n d d i s t r i b u t e m e d i a c o v e r a g e f r o m v a r i o u s o u t l e t s i n t h e C o u n t y a n d t h r o u g h o u t t h e r e g i o n t o C o m m i s s i o n e r s a n d s t a f f t o e n a b l e t h e m t o c l o s e l y f o l l o w t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p o l i c y t r e n d s . " P r o v i d e o v e r s i g h t a n d c o o r d i n a t i o n t o C o m m i s s i o n d e p a r t m e n t s i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f c o m m u n i c a t i o n s ' m a t e r i a l s . F o s t e r a n d m a i n t a i n e f f e c t i v e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s w i t h o t h e r a g e n c i e s t o h e i g h t e n t h e i r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e r o l e s a n d r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d i n c r e a s e i n t e r a g e n c y c o o r d i n a t i o n a n d c o o p e r a t i o n . ( P o l i c y G o a l : C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e : " A s s i g n d e s i g n a t e d s t a f f m e m b e r s t o a t t e n d o t h e r a g e n c y m e e t i n g s a n d r e q u i r e s t a f f t o p r o v i d e w r i t t e n / v e r b a l c o m m u n i c a t i o n o n t o p i c s o f d i s c u s s i o n d u r i n g r e g u l a r s t a f f m e e t i n g s . L e g i s l a t i v e A f f a i r s a n d C o m m u n i c a t i o n s P e r f o r m a n c e / W o r k l o a d I n d i c a t o r s F Y 1 1 / 1 2 E s t i m a t e d F Y 1 1 / 1 2 A c t u a l F Y 1 2 / 1 3 I F Y 1 3 / 1 4 E s t i m a t e d P r o j e c t e d S p e a k e r s b u r e a u p r e s e n t a t i o n s 3 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 L e g i s l a t i v e a c t i o n s u b m i t t a l s t o C o m m i s s i o n 9 9 9 9 S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a l e g i s l a t i v e s t a f f r o u n d t a b l e s 8 8 1 0 9 Finance Mission Statement: "To safeguard the Commission's assets and maintain strong and prudent fiscal controls in investing, accounting, budgeting, procurements, and financial reporting including ongoing disclosure to all interested parties. Seek financing alternatives that complement the Commission's strategic direction." Chart 28 — Finance Debt Service 49% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 8% Professional Costs 1 36% I i Support Costs 7% The Finance Department's total budget is $10,212,700 (Table 49) and reflects a 2% increase over the prior year's budget. Department staffing costs will total $840,300, reflecting an increase due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $3,701,700 include various services related to general and specialized legal, financial and investment advisory, external and internal audits, debt management, CAFR and annual budget graphic design, and procurement. Support costs of $664,700 include insurance, printing, and staff training. Capital outlay of $6,000 includes ERP updates. A transfer out of $5,000,000 is related to funding a portion of the debt service interest payments from the 2009 Measure A Western County bond financing program. Table 49 —Finance Expenditure Detail Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Leg( Services AdtServices Rrnndal Advisory Professional Services-Caneral Tatal Professiord Casts *vat Costs Capital Cutla/ Transfers Chit TOTALRnance FY13/12 FY12/13 FY12/13 FY13/14 Dolls Fervent Actual RevisedBuctet Projected ChwiSe aalle $ 832,ECo $ :%: 603 $ 774,C O $ 84:13:0 $ 11,71) 1% 3137C0 233000 2381900 2830m 93CC0 2 / 332,200 447,C00 447,CC0 483000 33C00 7'/0 733:0 3E4C00 125,CC0 283Cm 95 01) 51% 3174,70 _ UE2,103 2249,033 2,e31.X0 9 TO a/0 3,977,8b 3,514]OU 3119,90D arc, o 1f37,61:0 9% 516900 Ef3480 647,E EaX0 7,90D ro 7,CCO 5503 f C00 4000 N/A ]gC03000 5001COD S,COQC O 5iC IICO) - 0•' $ 15333900 $ 9,991900 $ 9,547,OOD $ 111212,7C0 $ 2 lio ?✓ Finance Staffing Summary Position FY W12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Accounting Assistant 2.00 2.00 Accounting Supervisor 0.99 0.99 Accounting Technician 2.00 2.00 Administrative Assistant 0.01 0.22 Chief Financial Officer 0.57 0.60 Executive Director 0.01 0.03 Finance Manager/Controller 0.83 0.75 Procurement Analyst 0.48 0.04 Procurement Manager 0.10 0.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.04 0.04 FTE 7.03 6.67 Department Budget Overview Department Description Finance and Accounting 2.00 0.99 2.00 0.39 0.48 0.00 0.70 0.16 0.13 0.05 6.90 Commission resources are allocated to assure financial stability and fiscal accountability. Finance activities include investing the Commission's cash resources, planning and directing financial transactions, and subsequent monitoring of legal and regulatory requirements. Adequate cash flow must be maintained while at the same time prudently investing operating and capital funds. Borrowing needs are carefully planned using both short- and long- term debt. Once debt is issued, there are ongoing responsibilities including interaction with financial advisors, bankers, dealers and remarketing agents, underwriters, bond counsel, bond insurers, trustees, issuing and paying agents, arbitrage consultants, and rating agencies as well as providing regular and consistent information disclosure to investors. Fiscal accountability involves receiving all funds due the Commission, paying all Commission obligations, maintaining the general ledger, reporting regularly on the Commission's fiscal results, and preparing and monitoring the budget. Fiscal accountability requires the coordination of budget planning and monitoring and the accurate and timely accounting for all funding sources, including compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing those funds. Accounting encompasses cash receipt and disbursement functions, maintenance of the general ledger including project cost accounting, payroll processing, quarterly and annual financial reporting, and retention of and coordination with independent auditors. The Commission also recognizes the importance of accountability for the organization. As a result, the Commission is highly regarded by individuals, peers, other organizations, and government officials at a local, regional, state, and national basis. A formal organizational accountability program was approved in January 2006 to address fraud risk, ethical conduct, financial and operational disclosure, and maintaining the public's confidence in the Commission. Accordingly, measures have been implemented based on a conceptual framework related to oversight, reporting, fraud, internal control, and ethics. Procurement Management In the management of the procurements and contracts process, the responsibility of the procurement management function is to ensure that the procurement policies approved by the Commission are followed and procurement procedures are updated as required. The function is responsible for the purchase of all goods and services, except for real property acquisition, in accordance with Commission policies and federal and state funding requirements to ensure the implementation of the Commission's projects and programs. This includes the administration of the Commission's DBE and SBE programs. Procuring goods and services for the Commission is a cooperative effort. All Commission staff involved in procurements for their projects and programs are responsible to employ sound judgment and appropriate standards of ethics and fairness to procure in a manner most advantageous to the Commission. The Procurement division also conducts a review of and updates insurance coverage for the Commission and its properties. Key Assumptions • The commercial paper program will continue as a short-term financing vehicle for the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan projects; however, one of the two letters of credit providing credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper program will be terminated and the commercial paper program reduced to $60,000,000 after financial close for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • The sales tax revenue bond SBPAs facilities will be maintained with the current short-term ratings. • Proceeds from the sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, and TIFIA loan will be used to fund the SR-91 capital improvement project. • Arbitrage calculations related to the outstanding debt issues will be performed by a consultant on an annual basis. • The Commission will pay 100% of the annual required contribution related to postretirement health care benefits based on a new actuarial valuation. • Directors and program managers will continue to have adequate project budget and accounting information to make informed decisions. • Construction fund bond proceeds will be invested in mid-term securities that mature in accordance with the construction draw schedule. Operating funds will be invested in state and local agency investment pools for short-term liquidity purposes and in mid-term treasury and federal agency securities as available funds are identified. The overall interest rate is conservatively projected to be .25% for state and County investment pools and .75% for funds held by the toll -supported debt trustee for debt service and construction funds. • Procurements will be conducted in accordance with the Commission's procurement policy manual. • Procurement will continue to develop and implement a standardized procurement filing system and maintain centralized procurement files. • Procurement will conduct outreach activities to encourage DBE and SBE participation in various contracts. Accomplishments • Conducted an internal audit review of the prime/sub-contractor invoice process. • Issued a request for proposal and awarded a contract for trustee services for the sales tax revenue bonds construction and toll revenue bonds proceeds in connection with the SR-91 corridor improvement project. • Issued a request for proposal and awarded a contract for investment management services for operating and capital funds. • Developed a plan of finance for the SR-91 corridor improvement project with the assistance of financial advisor and underwriters as well as various counsel. • Submitted a TIFIA loan application followed by a presentation to the U.S. DOT TIFIA Joint Program Office and approval of a TIFIA loan for the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Negotiations on the TIFIA loan are expected to conclude with the execution of a TIFIA loan agreement in July 2013. • Presented the SR-91 corridor improvement project plan of finance to the three rating agencies in order to maintain the Commission's AA rating related to sales tax revenue bonds and obtain investment grade ratings for the toll revenue bonds and TIFIA loan. • Obtained financial reporting excellence award from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) (20`h year) related to the CAFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. • Obtained GFOA distinguished budget award (17th year) for annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012. • Generated over $2 million in additional Measure A sales tax revenue since the engagement of a firm in January 2008 to provide sales tax audit services in order to detect and correct reporting errors. • Participated in the development of the three -party toll operations agreement related to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. " R e v i s e d t h e P r o c u r e m e n t P o l i c y M a n u a l t o p r o v i d e c o m p r e h e n s i v e g u i d a n c e r e g a r d i n g f e d e r a l , s t a t e a n d l o c a l p r o c u r e m e n t p o l i c i e s a n d p r o d u c e d a Q u i c k R e f e r e n c e G u i d e p o s t e r r e l a t e d t o p r o c u r e m e n t s . " I m p l e m e n t e d P l a n e t B i d s O n l i n e s y s t e m s o f t w a r e , a n e - p r o c u r e m e n t s o l u t i o n f o r o n l i n e v e n d o r a n d p r o c u r e m e n t m a n a g e m e n t . " C o m p l e t e d a F T A p r o c u r e m e n t s y s t e m s r e v i e w . " P a r t i c i p a t e d i n n u m e r o u s s m a l l b u s i n e s s n e t w o r k i n g a c t i v i t i e s a n d m e t w i t h p o t e n t i a l D B E a n d S B E v e n d o r s . " H o s t e d a s m a l l b u s i n e s s f o r u m f o r m i l i t a r y v e t e r a n s a n d D B E / S B E s t o l e a r n a b o u t c o n t r a c t i n g o p p o r t u n i t i e s a v a i l a b l e t h r o u g h t h e C o m m i s s i o n . " P a r t i c i p a t e d i n t h e M e m b e r A g e n c y A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e t o p r o v i d e g u i d a n c e a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s r e g a r d i n g M e t r o l i n k f i n a n c e s . M a j o r I n i t i a t i v e s F i n a n c e a n d A c c o u n t i n g T h e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m h a s b e e n i n p l a c e f o r o v e r e i g h t y e a r s a n d h a s p r o v i d e d s h o r t - t e r m , a d v a n c e f u n d i n g f o r p r o j e c t s i n c l u d e d i n t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A a n d r e l a t e d W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y D e l i v e r y P l a n . C o m m i s s i o n m a n a g e m e n t w i l l c o n t i n u e t o c o n s i d e r a p p r o p r i a t e u s e s o f c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r t o a d v a n c e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o j e c t s . T h e l e t t e r s o f c r e d i t s u p p o r t i n g t h e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m e x p i r e i n O c t o b e r 2 0 1 4 ; h o w e v e r , t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l t e r m i n a t e o n e o f t h e t w o l e t t e r s o f c r e d i t a n d r e i m b u r s e m e n t a g r e e m e n t s p r o v i d i n g c r e d i t a n d l i q u i d i t y s u p p o r t i n o r d e r t o r e d u c e t h e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m t o $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . I n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e 2 0 0 9 v a r i a b l e r a t e b o n d s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n e n t e r e d i n t o S B P A s w i t h J P M o r g a n , w h i c h w e r e e x t e n d e d t h r o u g h S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 4 . T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l m o n i t o r t h e c r e d i t q u a l i t y o f t h e b a n k s p r o v i d i n g t h e s e l i q u i d i t y f a c i l i t i e s f o r a n y a c t i o n s w h i c h m a y a f f e c t t h e s h o r t - t e r m r a t i n g s o f t h e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m a n d 2 0 0 9 B o n d s . S t a f f c o n t i n u e s t o d e v e l o p a c o m p r e h e n s i v e f i n a n c i n g p l a n t o s u p p o r t t h e h i g h w a y a n d r a i l c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s t o b e d e l i v e r e d t h r o u g h 2 0 1 9 a n d t o a s s e s s f u t u r e f i n a n c i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . T h i s f i n a n c i n g p l a n i n c o r p o r a t e s r e v i s e d s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e f o r e c a s t s a s w e l l a s o t h e r p o t e n t i a l f e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d l o c a l r e v e n u e s o u r c e s , i n c l u d i n g t o l l s . B a s e d o n t h e u p d a t e d c o s t e s t i m a t e s f o r t h e s e p r o j e c t s a n d i d e n t i f i e d r e v e n u e s , p o t e n t i a l p r o j e c t f u n d i n g s h o r t f a l l s m a y r e s u l t i n p r o j e c t d e f e r r a l s o r r e q u i r e a l t e r n a t i v e f i n a n c i n g s t r a t e g i e s . F i n a n c i n g a l t e r n a t i v e s t o b e c o n s i d e r e d i n c l u d e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r , l o n g - t e r m b o n d i s s u e s t o f i n a n c e M e a s u r e A a n d t o l l p r o j e c t s , a n d f e d e r a l l o a n p r o g r a m s . A s i g n i f i c a n t e f f o r t t h e p a s t f e w y e a r s r e l a t e d t o a p l a n o f f i n a n c e f o r t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t w i l l c u l m i n a t e i n J u l y 2 0 1 3 w i t h f i n a n c i a l c l o s e o f t h e 2 0 1 3 S a l e s T a x B o n d s , 2 0 1 3 T o l l B o n d s , a n d f e d e r a l T I F I A l o a n . D u r i n g F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l c o n s i d e r f i n a n c i n g o p p o r t u n i t i e s r e l a t e d t o t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s a n d 2 0 1 0 B o n d s t h a t m i n i m i z e e x p o s u r e t o f l u c t u a t i n g i n t e r e s t r a t e s a n d f e d e r a l b u d g e t i s s u e s . A s a r e s u l t o f t h e s i g n i f i c a n t f i n a n c i n g p r o c e e d s r e c e i v e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n o f f i n a n c e , t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l i n v e s t s u c h f u n d s a s w e l l a s a v a i l a b l e o p e r a t i n g f u n d s w i t h t h e a d v i c e a n d a s s i s t a n c e o f i n v e s t m e n t m a n a g e r s a n d a d v i s o r s . I n v e s t m e n t s w i l l b e m a d e i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s p r i o r i t i e s o f s a f e t y , l i q u i d i t y , a n d t h e n y i e l d . T h e i n v e s t m e n t m a n a g e r s a n d a d v i s o r s w i l l a l s o r e v i e w t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s i n v e s t m e n t p o l i c y f o r a n y r e q u i r e d u p d a t e s a n d o t h e r r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . T o e n s u r e t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e c e i v e s t h e p r o p e r a m o u n t o f M e a s u r e A s a l e s t a x e s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l c o n t i n u e t o e n g a g e a f i r m t o c o n d u c t s a l e s t a x a u d i t s e r v i c e s . T h e f i r m w i l l a l s o p r o v i d e q u a r t e r l y s a l e s t a x a n a l y s i s a n d r e p o r t i n g s e r v i c e s , o f w h i c h a s u m m a r y r e p o r t i s p r e s e n t e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n a q u a r t e r l y b a s i s . T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l a l s o e n g a g e a c o n s u l t a n t t o p r o v i d e s e m i - a n n u a l s a l e s t a x f o r e c a s t s . T h e F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t w i l l c o n t i n u e t o k e e p a b r e a s t o f G A S B t e c h n i c a l a c t i v i t i e s a f f e c t i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a c c o u n t i n g a n d f i n a n c i a l r e p o r t i n g a c t i v i t i e s . V a r i o u s n e w s t a n d a r d s w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d f o r e a r l y i m p l e m e n t a t i o n a s p a r t o f t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e C A F R f o r t h e y e a r e n d e d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 3 . T h e F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t w i l l a l s o c o n t i n u e t o c o n s i d e r c h a n g e s t o a c c o u n t i n g a n d f i n a n c i a l r e p o r t i n g r e l a t e d t o t h e c o m m e n c e m e n t o f t o l l o p e r a t i o n s i n F Y 2 0 1 6 / 1 7 . T h e F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t w i l l c o n t i n u e t o u p d a t e i t s E R P s y s t e m t h a t i n t e g r a t e s d a t a p r o c e s s i n g a c r o s s t h e C o m m i s s i o n , a u t o m a t e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e p r o c e s s e s , a n d e m b r a c e d a t a i n t e g r a t i o n . T h e c o n t i n u e d E R P e f f i c i e n c y g a i n s i n c l u d e a n automated paperless workflow system, advanced project accounting, multi -year budgeting, multi -year contract management, grant tracking, and readily available scanned images that can be retrieved by all users. Procurement Management A centralized procurements process will continue to be implemented to manage requests for proposals, qualifications, invitations for bids, small purchases, and related contract administration issues. The Procurement Policy Manual was recently updated to reflect current best practices and applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Accordingly, the procurement system will strengthen controls to ensure consistency in the development and application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable laws and regulations, especially those related to federal and state grants. Procurement Management is responsible for developing, implementing, and monitoring DBE and SBE program requirements in coordination with contractors and other appropriate officials. Duties and responsibilities include establishing DBE attainment goals, monitoring reporting and utilization by contractors, gathering and reporting statistical data and other information as required, reviewing third party contracts and purchase requisitions for compliance with the program, ensuring that bid notices and requests for proposals are made available to DBEs and SBEs in a timely manner, reporting to and advising the Executive Director and Commission on DBE and SBE matters, and providing outreach to DBEs and SBEs to fully advise them of contracting opportunities. During FY 2013/14 the Commission will host and attend several outreach events in order to acquaint potential vendors with the Commission's procurement procedures and opportunities. Staff also consults with the Commission's insurance broker in procuring competitive quotes, on an annual basis, for various insurance coverages secured by the Commission in order to provide cost effective solutions to meet its diverse insurance needs. Department Goals Protect the Commission's cash resources by regular monitoring of investment practices to ensure consistency with established investment policy. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Utilize investment management and advisory services to prudently invest operating and capital funds in accordance with the Commission's investment policies. • Achieve a rate of return at least equal to the County of Riverside Treasury Pool rate for operating funds. • Establish an appropriate benchmark for the investment of debt proceeds. Manage the Commission's outstanding debt ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations and continued investor awareness and receptivity to the Commission's program. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Provide an annual update and review of the debt programs with one or more of the rating agencies no later than June 30, 2014. • Meet continuing disclosure requirements of the debt programs and comply with the TIFIA loan reporting requirements. • Prepare arbitrage calculations as required. Ensure the Commission and funding recipients comply with Measure A and TDA laws and regulations as they relate to the annual financial and compliance audits as well as close cooperation and coordination with independent auditors. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Minimize the number of substantive management letter comments and compliance findings requiring corrective action by the Commission. • Maintain appropriate fiduciary review and monitoring procedures for Measure A recipient and TDA claimant audits. Maintain fiscal and budgetary control through monitoring of periodic results and ensuring consistency with the Commission's strategic direction. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Obtain the GFOA Distinguished Budget Award for the FY 2013/14 budget. • Facilitate a comprehensive budgeting approach that effectively involves management staff, requiring full accountability for all department expenditures. • Fund 100% of the annual required contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. Assure fiscal accountability for Commission funds with general ledger accounting and financial reporting consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Ensure proactive communication and timely responses to any noted errors, corrections, and budget transfers related to program management reviews of accounting and budget information. • Obtain an unqualified opinion on the basic financial statements. • Receive financial reporting excellence award from the GFOA related to the preparation and issuance of the CAFR. • Stay abreast of finance, accounting, and financial reporting developments by attending training and conferences in these general areas or in specialized areas applicable to job duties. • Update and maintain the fiscal policies and procedures manual. • Update and maintain complete accounting desk procedures manual for ERP system to facilitate cross training. • Assist local governments with Measure A funding by providing timely allocation of funds for eligible projects and financing opportunities to the extent funding does not impact other programs and is financially feasible and prudent. • Maintain ERP system to reflect technical updates and current technology. • Commence development of accounting and financial process with the RCTC 91 Express Lanes operator and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in preparation for start of toll operations in 2017. Develop and maintain an organizational accountability program encompassing financial and operational functions. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Establish and implement measures related to oversight, fraud, internal control, and ethics. • Issue annual disclosure statements related to financial and operational responsibilities. Procure goods and services from qualified consultants, contractors, and other vendors in accordance with laws and regulations at a competitive price. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Assist departments and programs to procure and obtain goods and services in a cost effective and efficient manner. • Ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with a comprehensive Procurement Policy Manual. • Ensure that agreements, amendments, and MOUs are entered into with appropriate legal considerations. • Process agreements, amendments, and MOUs in a timely and efficient manner. • Ensure that consistent procedures, processes, and tools are used for procurements. Review existing procurement policies and procedures. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Ensure that the procurement polices reflect Commission requirements and practices. • Segregate policies and procedures so that procedures can be easily updated without Commission approval. • Ensure that procurement policies and procedures reflect the requirements of the Commission's federal, state, and other funding sources. • Provide an easy to read desktop quick procurement policies reference guide for use by Commission staff. • Maximize the value received for the Commission's expenditure of public funds. • Provide all vendors an equal opportunity to provide needed goods and/or services. Finance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Sales tax revenue bond rating Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Toll revenue bond rating N/A N/A N/A BBB-/BBB- TIFIA loan rating N/A NJA N/A BBB - Commercial paper rating P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ GFOA Certificate of Achievement Awarded Awarded Awarded Awarded GFOA Distinguished Budget Award Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Invoices processed 4,100 5,545 5,600 5,800 Checks processed 3,100 3,762 3,800 4,000 Audit adjustments 0 0 0 0 Average yield on investments .50% .30% .25% .25% operating / .75% debt proceeds Payroll hours processed 72,700 82,209 87,300 95,000 Accounts receivable invoices processed 160 176 180 200 Agreements processed 180 203 150 160 Riverside (Aunty Transportation C.ommission MirA Nbid Prg Planning and Programming Mission Statement: "To exert leadership in transportation planning and the programming of funds to improve mobility, foster environmental stewardship, expedite project delivery, and form partnerships with regional, state, and federal agencies resulting in maximum returns on local investment. Support a coordinated regional approach to solving transportation funding issues." Chart 29 — Planning and Programming Protects and Operations 74% Expenditures Professional Costs 8% ~`LSupport Costs 0% Planning and Programming expenditures of $5,845,000 have increased 17% from last year's budget (Table 50). Salaries and benefits represent 18% of total expenditures and reflects an increase due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services totaling $487,500 have increased 34% compared to the FY 2012/13 budget due to walkability grant activities and air quality assessments. Professional services include CMP implementation efforts, air quality analysis, project database management, local and regional planning activities, on -call goods movement consultants, and legal services. Projects and operations costs have increased 14% due to an increase in LTF disbursements for planning and programming activities and rail allocations related to grade separation projects in the cities of Corona, Jurupa Valley, and Riverside and the County. Table 50 - Planning and Programming Expenditure Detail FY11/12 FY72/13 FY12,/13 FYl'?i/14 Ma Percent Adel Revised Budget Projected Burt Gine Charge $ 904800 $ EB5,8:0 $ SE42m $ 1.CB2700 $ 1%900 24' Salaries and Benefits Professiond Costs Legal Services Professional Services-Gareral Total Professional Costs Support Casts Projects and Operations Spedd Stucies Cperatirg and Capital Disbaserrents Total Projects and Operations Capital Outlay TOTALPla-rirgand Picgrarrrirg 17,E 21,900 17,0 0 21,930 1.15,7CO 343900 181,000 41:6000 M,900 3Ei2,800 1%000 4R500 17,400 24300 16400 23,300 147,830 61Ci000 2501C00 614000 2,1758a) 3,161200 2.115o00 368Z9:0 2,323,600 3,771,200 23155003 4301,9o0 27,200 $ 3,399i900 $ 4934,103 $ 3,53$0:0 $ 5845,000 $ Planning and Programming Staffing Summary Position Administrative Assistant Chief Financial Officer Deputy Executive Director Executive Director Goods Movement Manager Planning & Programming Director Planning & Programming Manager Procurement Analyst Project Development Director Senior Staff Analyst Staff Analyst FTE Department Budget Overview Department Description FY 11/12 0.10 0.04 0.16 0.44 0.96 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.11 1.00 1.04 003 -2%/ 125100 37'% 124700 34' ROM 4/0 4,030 1% 525300 17% at KO 14% N/A 85Q900 17% FY 12/13 FY 13/14 0.45 0.02 0.13 0.36 0.70 0.00 0.95 0.02 0.06 0.97 1.09 0.17 0.04 0.05 0.47 0.70 1.00 0.85 0.00 0.10 0.95 0.99 4.80 4.75 5.32 The Commission is responsible for short- and long-range transportation planning and programming. Short-range planning and programming involves the development of the five-year STIP and preparation of the five-year FTIP for Riverside County. These programming documents identify projects and their respective funding and schedules. The Commission's involvement with long-range planning efforts includes the coordination and input into planning efforts throughout the County and southern California region. These efforts involve participation in local, bi- county, and regional corridor studies, including the continued development of the CETAP corridors. Regional planning efforts are incorporated in the RTP (a 30-year transportation plan) developed by SCAG in conjunction with county transportation commissions, sub -regional agencies, local agencies, transit operators, and other interested parties. The Commission is responsible for approving projects for Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds in Western County and coordinating with Ca!trans on the selection of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds as part of the STIP approved by the CTC every two years. The Commission has delegated the authority to nominate projects for RIP funds in the Coachella Valley to CVAG. A MOU between the city of Blythe, representing Palo Verde Valley, and the Commission allows the city to trade RIP funds for local Measure A funds. In November 2006, Proposition 1B was approved by the voters of California, which provided $20 billion in transportation infrastructure funding. Various program categories were established including a $2 billion infusion into the STIP. Other competitive program categories included CMIA and TGIF; Riverside County was successful in receiving CMIA funding for the SR-91 HOV lanes and 1-215 widening projects as well as TCIF funding for 12 grade separation projects and a ground access improvement project at the I-215/Van Buren interchange. The Commission is a member of the Southern California Consensus Group that developed and submitted project proposals for the TCIF program. As with the RIP and IIP funds, Proposition 1B funds are administered and allocated by the CTC. Given the current economic conditions, Proposition 1B funds have been the most reliable state funding source for transportation projects. Proposition 1B CMIA funds are legislatively set to expire by the end of 2013. SLPP funding is another program authorized by Proposition 1B. A formula program has been established for transportation agencies that administer self-help transportation sales tax programs. Riverside County's formula share over the five-year program was $58.941 million. SLPP funds must be programmed for construction and matched by the sales tax on a 50-50 basis. The Commission approved three projects in Western County, and CVAG selected six projects in the Coachella Valley. SLPP fund allocation requests must be submitted and approved by the CTC's June 2013 meeting. Programming specifically involves the development, review, and approval of projects for various funding programs. Additionally, programming involves the monitoring of projects from project selection through construction close- out. In order to receive federal funds and approvals, all projects funded with federal and state dollars, or local projects that are regionally significant, must be included in the RTP and FTIP. SCAG is responsible for incorporating all six county (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) transportation improvement programs into one regional programming document and conducting a conformity analysis with the adopted air plans to ensure compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The RTP is updated every four years, and the FTIP update effort is performed every 18 to 24 months. Multiple amendments occur within each RTP and FTIP cycle. FTIP amendments can occur for minor project changes that do not affect the conformity analysis. The Commission is responsible for allocating the following local, state, and federal funding sources: Local Sources: • 1989 and 2009 Measure A • Western County TUMF regional arterial program State Sources: • SB821 bicycle and pedestrian projects • RIP • Proposition 1B Federal Sources: • Congressional discretionary programs, such as ARRA • Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) (formerly TE) • STP • CMAQ The Commission also serves as the CMA for the County and is responsible for developing and updating the CMP. The CMP was developed to meet state legislation and federal Congestion Management System (CMS) requirements, which includes an enhanced traffic monitoring system. The CMP's highways and regional arterials are regularly monitored to ensure that they are operating at acceptable levels (above Level of Service (LOS) "F"). If a deficiency occurs along the CMP system, a deficiency plan must be prepared that identifies mitigation measures and/or projects that will improve the LOS to "E" or higher. Partnership development, public and private, is critical to the Commission's continued success in affecting positive transportation decisions to meet future demands. Commission staff works in close coordination with its partners to advocate for federal, state, and local funding to improve mobility and mitigate the impacts of goods movement. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue its efforts in working with transportation partners to streamline and improve project delivery. • Consultant contracts are maintained to provide assistance with the CMP, air quality analysis, project database management, and other related planning activities. • The Commission will utilize all available funding sources on transportation projects identified in the 1989 Measure A and the 2009 Measure A as well as other regional high priority projects, including TUMF regional arterial projects and grade separation projects. • The Commission will continue participation in local, bi-county, and regional planning efforts representing the interests of the County. • The Commission will work with the CTC, Caltrans, and local project sponsors to implement projects funded with STIP-RIP, CMIA, SLPP formula, and TCIF to ensure that the programming and allocations are consistent with project schedules. • The Commission will continue to assist local project sponsors with the processing of state and federal funding approvals/obligations/allocations and overall project delivery. Accomplishments • Processed 32 STIP actions that consisted of but were not limited to: allocations, financial allocation amendments, programming of funds, future consideration of funding, and baseline agreement amendments. • Completed the technical studies and prepared the draft recirculated environmental document and project report for the modified Mid County Parkway project. • Completed four local agency agreements and/or amendments for the implementation of TUMF regional arterial projects. • Processed over 53 project amendments into the 2011 FTIP and 148 project amendments in the 2013. • Coordinated with Caltrans and project sponsors regarding the obligation of federal and state funding, met obligation deadlines, and prevented loss of funding to the County. • Monitored federal funding expenditures of inactive projects to ensure funds are not deobligated. • Advised local agencies and coordinated the use of toll credits and local match waiver for federally funded projects funded at the maximum reimbursement level, saving the Commission and local agencies up to $23.3 million in local match funds. Of the $23.3 million, $1.66 million toll credits were programmed and obligated in FY 2012/13. • Reviewed and approved five-year capital improvement plans (CIP) for each local agency in the County. • Processed one RTP project amendment. • Worked with Southern California agencies to develop MAP-21 funding distribution recommendations. • Monitored expansion projects for each of the Ports. • Monitored TCIF project development to ensure timely completion of the it grade separations and a ground access improvement project to improve the I-215/Van Buren interchange as required for the $162.7 million Proposition 1B TCIF funds. One project (Columbia Avenue in Riverside) was completed in March 2010; an additional project (Magnolia Avenue in Riverside) was completed in January 2012. Currently under construction are the Iowa Avenue grade crossing and the I-215/Van Buren interchange project. Two additional grade separation projects, Auto Center Drive in Corona and Streeter Avenue in Riverside, are projected to start construction by March 2013. The remaining six TCIF projects will start construction no later than January 2014. • Developed the 2012 Grade Separation Funding Strategy: A Blueprint for Advancing Projects. • Continued to take a leadership role and work collaboratively with the five -county consensus working group, Mobility 21, SCAG's Southern California National Freight Gateway Collaboration, and the CAGTC on goods movement issues. Major Initiatives Each county transportation commission throughout the State is responsible for programming RIP funds, which represents 75% of the total STIP funding available statewide for capital enhancement projects. The 75% funding level is then further distributed with 60% of the funds allocated to Southern California and 40% to Northern California. A population formula is then applied to determine county funding levels called "county shares." The Commission is responsible for ensuring that projects funded with STIP funding are administered and implemented consistent with CTC and Caltrans policies. It is the Commission's policy to set aside 2% off the top for staff support to carry out STIP PPM activities. The remaining RIP funds are further distributed geographically among Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley per the Commission's intra-county STIP formula. The Commission also may consider a call for projects for RIP discretionary funds. Federal TAP funds are also administered through the STIP. TAP funds are not subject to general fund diversions; however, TAP funds are authorized each year by the passage of the state budget. MAP-21 directs TAP funds to be distributed through a minimum of four competitive processes. Federal and state guidance will be issued over the next few months that will outline the distribution and administration of the TAP funds including project categories. CMIA and TCIF funds are monitored by Caltrans and the CTC. Baseline agreements are developed for each project under these programs. Any changes to project funding, scope, or schedule will require an amendment to the baseline agreement. The CTC allocates the CMIA and TCIF funds, and the process for allocating the funds is similar to the process established for STIP funds. TUMF funds are collected and administered by WRCOG. Approximately half of the TUMF funds collected are set aside for WRCOG's zone projects and regional transit facilities. After the deduction of an administrative fee, WRCOG provides the other half of the TUMF revenues to the Commission. These funds are further distributed to the Commission's TUMF CETAP corridors and regional arterial programs. In September 2004, the Commission established a five-year program and approved the programming of 24 regional arterial projects. To date, $100 million has been programmed for TUMF regional arterial projects. Due to fluctuating TUMF revenues over the past few years, $11.5 million in 2009 Western County Measure A regional arterial (MARA) funds and $25.5 million in TUMF CETAP funds were programmed on two projects to fulfill the TUMF commitment. Of the 24 TUMF regional arterial projects, six projects have completed construction, eight projects are currently under construction or will begin construction in FY 2013/14, and five additional projects are anticipated to begin construction in FY 2014/15. Six projects have been placed on hold at the request of the local agency. Planning and Programming also manages the 2009 Western County MARA program. The expenditures for these regional arterial capital projects are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. Transportation Planning The Commission's role in planning throughout the year will involve working with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), FTA, Caltrans, SCAG, sub -regional agencies, local agencies, and the other county transportation commissions in the region on various planning efforts relative to the implementation of the 2012 RTP/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), corridor studies, goods movement studies, and efforts to update transportation computer models and project databases. In FY 2013/14 the Commission will continue its work efforts on the intra-county CETAP corridors. An updated environmental document and project report has been prepared for the Mid County Parkway to address changes made to the project limits, which are now between SR-79 and 1-215. The recirculated/supplemental draft environmental document was released for public review and comment in January 2013. Final project approval and conclusion of the environmental phase is expected in Spring 2014. Work on a portion of the north -south CETAP corridor is underway with the Commission's 1-215 south widening project and improvements to the French Valley Parkway interchange being led by the city of Temecula. Given funding constraints, work on the two inter -county CETAP corridors by the Commission is not expected in this fiscal year. The FY 2013/14 CMP effort will involve updating the CMP (as required by federal CMS regulations). The update will involve an analysis of the level of service on the CMP system, review and incorporation of any new state and federal requirements, and aligning requirements for consistency with the RTP/SCS. Transportation Programming As mentioned above, the Commission is responsible for allocating various local, state and federal funds. These funds are monitored to ensure that regulations are adhered to in order to prevent funds from lapsing. The following summarizes the status of these funding programs: Local Funding Western County TUMF Regional Arterial Program Project monitoring of TUMF regional arterial projects by Planning and Programming staff will occur according to the agreements between local agencies and the Commission. In addition, Commission staff will work with local agencies regarding amendments to agreements and any issues regarding project delivery. To date, 24 project agreements have been executed totaling approximately $100 million of TUMF regional arterial funds. During FY 2013/14, a total of $46 million is anticipated to be reimbursed to local agencies for TUMF regional arterial projects. These project expenditures are included in the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial Program A call for projects is being planned for the 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial program. To date, this funding source has been reviewed for qualifying projects on a case by case basis. Two TUMF regional arterial projects and three MARA projects have been approved for these funds totaling $18.8 million. The balance of available MARA funds will be included in the upcoming call for projects, which will also include federal fund sources. 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads In order to receive Measure A local streets and roads funding, each year local jurisdictions are required to submit their five-year CIP based on Measure A revenue projections. Additionally, the local jurisdictions are required to submit a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) certification consistent with adopted MOE guidelines and participate in the MSHCP and in the local agency's respective TUMF program, as applicable. Amendments to CIPs are processed administratively for minor changes that do not affect the total programmed amount or are within budget levels. Significant changes require Commission approval. State Funding STIP- RIP/IIP STIP funding continues to be unstable with a minimal amount of programming capacity resulting from the last two STIP cycles. Proposition 113 has provided funding for STIP projects and other bond program categories such as CMIA, TCIF, and SLPP. However, the State's declining revenues and budget impasses have limited the frequency and timing of bond issuances. The recent economic challenges created an advantage for construction projects with a low bid environment. Cost savings for STIP and Proposition 1B projects have resulted in additional programming capacity, and the Commission will be prepared to apply for these additional funds. This year Commission staff will continue to deliver projects programmed in the 2012 STIP and work with local agencies to ensure that bond funds are allocated by the respective deadlines. Staff will also be involved with the development of the 2014 STIP guidelines and federal/state Active Transportation (AT) program development working with the CTC, Caltrans, SCAG, and regional transportation planning agencies. 58821 Annually, the Commission releases a call for bicycle and pedestrian projects in April. These projects are funded by 2% of LTF revenues, as required by SB821. The Commission establishes an evaluation committee to rank eligible projects that meet the established criteria. Project recommendations are approved by the Commission in June of each year. The Commission approved seventeen projects in the amount of $1.635 million for FY 2012/13. The FY 2013/14 call for projects will have new funding of approximately $1.38 million available for award. These expenditures are included in the LTF special revenue fund, which is reflected in the Public and Specialized Transit Department since this fund's activities relate primarily to transit funding. Federal Funding CMAQ STP, and TE The Commission is responsible for allocating CMAQ and STP funds to transportation projects in the County. In 2003, the Commission directed staff to program SAFETEA-LU funds (CMAQ and STP) to projects that were impacted by the state budget crisis and/or the rise in construction material costs with the exception of the CMAQ funding that is apportioned to the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The Commission delegates the selection of projects for CMAQ funds apportioned to the SSAB to CVAG. In 2007, the Commission approved 25% of future CMAQ and STP funds for grade separation projects approved in the Proposition 1B TCIF program. With the decline in State revenues over the past few years, the Commission has focused funds toward high priority regional projects that are ready for construction. Through the passage of MAP-21, CMAQ funding levels and project categories have changed to include the consideration of Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 non -attainment areas and direct funding to PM 2.5 projects such as diesel retrofits. Funding levels will be identified in the near future as FHWA develops new CMAQ guidance. MAP-21 restructured the former TE program, which was administered and programmed in the STIP by the CTC. The State is currently developing an AT program that will consolidate federal and state funding that traditionally funded bicycle and pedestrian projects. Although TAP funds are federal, state budget authority must be granted in order for the funds to be allocated by the CTC. If the State budget approval is delayed, the TAP funds cannot be allocated until the State budget is passed. In 2005, the Commission approved 18 projects totaling $17.6 million. To date, 17 projects have been delivered, and the remaining project will be allocated in FY 2012/13. In FY 2011/12 the Commission partnered with Caltrans and wildlife agencies on a TE project in the Santa Ana Canyon. The Commission approved use of regional TE funds for the improvement of the B Canyon wildlife corridor, which is widely used by small to mid -sized mammals between the Cleveland National Forest, Santa Ana River, and the Puente -Chino Hills. Funding from the partner agencies is still being secured. Project Monitoring The high demand for reporting and monitoring the progress of projects is essential to prevent funds from lapsing. The programming project database, Fundtrack, allows for efficient monitoring of project schedules and funding. Local agencies have been provided access to project information as well as the capability to update their respective project information in a timely manner. The Planning and Programming Department provides assistance to the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department and local agencies by participating in regular project delivery team meetings and preparing and submitting requests for authorization (RFA)/allocation of federal and state funding. In addition, Programming monitors allocation and award deadlines, expenditures, project closeouts, and inactive projects of federal and state funded projects to prevent loss of funds. Regional issues The Commission's work effort will remain focused on facilitating ongoing commitments as well as being responsive to various emerging issues. These include bi-county issues with the counties of San Bernardino, Orange, Imperial, and San Diego as well as goods movement. The Commission will continue working with partners from the Southern California Consensus Group (Ports, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority, SANBAG, OCTA, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Ventura County Transportation Commission, SCAG, and SCRRA) regarding goods movement issues. A priority will be to coordinate with legislative staff and advocacy groups such as Mobility 21 and CAGTC to secure funding through the federal transportation bill for goods movement -related needs such as the funding of Alameda Corridor East grade separations in the County and/or the creation of a federal freight trust fund, or similar program with a dedicated and firewalled revenue structure, in order to treat the nation's multimodal national goods movement network as a system rather than individual projects. The Commission will continue to monitor the Ports' projects for possible impacts on Riverside County by reviewing agendas and requesting notices for projects under CECW and the Brown Act. Department Goals Build upon relationships with local, state, and federal agencies to coordinate short- and long-range planning to ensure that transportation projects receive funding and approvals. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Work with CVAG, WRCOG, Caltrans, transit operators, local agencies, and SCAG to coordinate project amendments to the 2012 RTP and/or 2013 FTIP. • Provide the Commissioners information to assist in advocating Commission projects. • Continue CETAP intra-county corridor work. • Continue working with the RCA to implement the MSHCP. • Maintain maximum flexibility in project selection for MAP-21 fund sources to serve the diverse needs of Riverside County. Continue to seek a stronger role for county transportation commissions in state and regional transportation and air quality programs in order to direct funding for programs and projects that will improve air quality and mobility in Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Support efforts to seek additional funding at the local, state, and federal levels for projects that improve air quality. • Support ongoing efforts to regulate federal emission sources. • Support efforts that allow more flexibility in funding transit operating and capital costs. Continue implementation of the CMP in cooperation with SCAG, WRCOG, CVAG, Caltrans, and local agencies and maintain federal certification for the CMP. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objectives: • Implement the CMP to meet federal CMS requirements cited under the metropolitan planning organization (i.e., SCAG) planning regulations. • Provide data collected on the CMP system to SCAG and Caltrans for reporting on the Highway Performance Monitoring System. • Provide data collected on the CMP system to local agencies and other interested parties. • Continue monitoring the CMP system to ensure the minimum adopted LOS threshold is met. Continue working with Caltrans to monitor traffic conditions for the purpose of focusing transportation funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies. (Policy Goal: System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Review Caltrans' Performance Monitoring System count data to infill segments that currently do not have Smart Call Boxes or loop detectors to monitor traffic. • Identify congested corridors for potential funding opportunities. Continue to advocate for jobs/housing balance and attracting high income jobs to Riverside County in addition to addressing intercounty congestion. (Policy Goal: Economic Development) Objectives: • Participate in ongoing studies and activities regarding the jobs/housing imbalance between Orange and Riverside counties and San Diego and Riverside counties. • Support the County interests pertaining to transportation planning as population, job, and housing forecasts are developed by SCAG and the State. Maintain Fundtrack project database to allow for efficient monitoring of projects and funding with the ability to share project information with local jurisdictions. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Maintain consultant contract to manage and host the Commission's web -based project management database. • Work with SCAG and other county transportation commissions to refine and maintain the SCAG regional database, including the coordination of the Commission's database with SCAG's FTIP database. • Coordinate with Caltrans to assure database compatibility and promote information sharing including timely reporting of fund obligation information. Ensure maximum funding and flexibility for projects funded with STIP-RIP, Proposition 1B, and federal MAP-21 funds. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Participate in statewide efforts to implement projects and fully utilize all available funds from Proposition 1B funding programs. • Work with Caltrans and the CTC to meet the intent of the Proposition 1B programs (including CMIA, TCIF, and SLPP) related to implementing projects within the timeframes specified in the baseline project agreements or programming application. • Advocate that regions that program local and federal funds to replace state funding due to the state budget shortfall (or limited allocation capacity) be given high priority for repayment when funds are available, or in future programming in the next STIP programming cycle. • Participate in various state and federal forums to increase funding levels, streamline programming processes, and provide flexibility in obligating funds. • Support efforts advocating the continuation and protection of state transportation funding and the payback of loans taken from state transportation accounts. • Advocate that RIP county share reserves receive priority programming over counties that advance shares. • Continue to strategically program and fund projects in an effort to obligate and/or allocate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding. • Participate in Southern California Programming Roundtable meetings to ensure that 100% of federal obligation authority (OA) for CMAQ and STP funding is obligated within the SCAG region. • Continue to monitor project implementation through the use of milestone reporting on a quarterly basis to maintain maximum funding levels for projects and prevent loss of funds to Riverside County. Provide support to the Commission's Capital Project Development and Delivery and Finance departments to maintain project funding and schedules and minimize programming issues. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Provide input to the budget development process. • Attend regular meetings with the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. • Serve in an oversight role regarding project invoicing and close-outs. " P r e p a r e p r o j e c t a g r e e m e n t s u m m a r i e s . " C o o r d i n a t e p r o j e c t R F A / O A p a c k a g e s . " M o n i t o r p r o g r e s s o f p r o j e c t m i l e s t o n e s a n d R F A s a s t h e y a r e p r o c e s s e d t h r o u g h C a l t r a n s h e a d q u a r t e r s a n d F H W A . " P r e p a r e C T C a l l o c a t i o n r e q u e s t s , e x t e n s i o n s , a n d a m e n d m e n t s f o r S T I P a n d P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B f u n d e d p r o j e c t s . P r o v i d e a s s i s t a n c e t o l o c a l a g e n c i e s t o f a c i l i t a t e a n d s t r e a m l i n e p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y & C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e s : " C o n t i n u e c o o r d i n a t i o n o f T A C m e e t i n g s . " P r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g p r o j e c t p r o g r a m m i n g d a t a , i n c l u d i n g f u n d i n g s t a t u s , t o p r o j e c t s p o n s o r s o n a q u a r t e r l y b a s i s . " P r o v i d e l o c a l a g e n c i e s w i t h r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s o n p r o j e c t p r o g r a m m i n g t o m i n i m i z e u n n e c e s s a r y r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d d e l a y s . " U p o n r e q u e s t , a t t e n d l o c a l a g e n c y p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y t e a m m e e t i n g s t o p r o v i d e a d v i c e o n p r o g r a m m i n g i s s u e s . " M e e t r e g u l a r l y w i t h C a l t r a n s l o c a l a s s i s t a n c e s t a f f t o m o n i t o r p r o j e c t s u b m i t t a l s a n d r e s o l v e p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n a n d o b l i g a t i o n i s s u e s . " A s s i s t l o c a l a g e n c i e s i n p r e p a r i n g R F A s , S T I P s u b m i t t a l s , a n d i n a c t i v e r e p o r t i n g j u s t i f i c a t i o n s . C o n t i n u e t o w o r k w i t h s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l a g e n c i e s t o s t r e a m l i n e p r o c e s s e s f o r f u n d i n g a n d p r o j e c t a p p r o v a l s . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y , E n v i r o n m e n t a l S t e w a r d s h i p & C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e s : " M a i n t a i n r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h k e y s t a f f a t r e g i o n a l , s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l a g e n c i e s . " P a r t i c i p a t e i n S C A G ' s N a t i o n a l F r e i g h t G a t e w a y C o l l a b o r a t i o n t o d e f i n e a s y s t e m t h a t m e e t s t h e r e g i o n ' s l o n g - t e r m m o b i l i t y , s a f e t y , e n v i r o n m e n t a l , a n d e n e r g y n e e d s i n c l u d i n g d e v e l o p i n g a b r a n d s p e c i f i c t o g o o d s m o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s i n S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . " I d e n t i f y p r o b l e m a t i c a r e a s w i t h p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y a n d / o r p r o g r a m m i n g a n d w o r k w i t h f e d e r a l l o b b y i s t s t o d e v e l o p s o l u t i o n s f o r s t r e a m l i n i n g a n d c l a r i f y i n g p r o c e s s e s f o r t h e n e x t f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n b i l l . " P a r t i c i p a t e i n r e g i o n a l , s t a t e , a n d f e d e r a l f o r u m s a d d r e s s i n g i s s u e s r e l a t e d t o p r o j e c t p r o g r a m m i n g , i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , a n d a i r q u a l i t y c o n f o r m i t y . F a c i l i t a t e d e v e l o p m e n t o f r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s o l u t i o n s t h a t b e n e f i t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , i n c l u d i n g i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B T C I F p r o j e c t s a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n P l a n . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : G o o d s M o v e m e n t , I n t e r m o d a l i s m & A c c e s s i b i l i t y ) O b j e c t i v e : " M o n i t o r p r o g r e s s m a d e i n c o n s t r u c t i n g t h e T C I F - f u n d e d p r o j e c t s t h r o u g h d i s c u s s i o n s w i t h s t a f f f r o m p a r t n e r a g e n c i e s i n c l u d i n g C a l t r a n s ; c i t i e s o f B a n n i n g , C o a c h e l l a , C o r o n a , a n d R i v e r s i d e ; a n d t h e C o u n t y . T i m e l y c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e T C I F p r o j e c t s i s r e q u i r e d t o d e m o n s t r a t e t h e r e g i o n ' s a b i l i t y t o d e l i v e r p r o j e c t s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e C T C ' s d i r e c t i o n w h e n t h e P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B f u n d i n g w a s a l l o c a t e d . D e t e r m i n e w h e r e f u t u r e e f f o r t s r e g a r d i n g a d d r e s s i n g R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y g o o d s m o v e m e n t i s s u e s w o u l d p r o v e m o s t e f f e c t i v e . ( P o l i c y G o a l : G o o d s M o v e m e n t ) O b j e c t i v e s : " I d e n t i f y d r i v e r s o f d e m a n d f o r g o o d s m o v e m e n t s e r v i c e s a n d p e r f o r m a n c e o f m o d a l s y s t e m s a n d s e r v i c e s a s w e l l a s p u b l i c b e n e f i t s , s p e c i f i c a r e a s o f i n e f f i c i e n c y , a n d t h e i m p a c t s o f g o o d s m o v e m e n t o n c o m m u n i t i e s . " I m p l e m e n t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s 2 0 1 2 G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n F u n d i n g S t r a t e g y t h r o u g h c o o r d i n a t i o n o f a d v o c a c y e f f o r t s w i t h t h e L e g i s l a t i v e A f f a i r s a n d C o m m u n i c a t i o n s D e p a r t m e n t . Facilitate public and private investments in clean air technology in support of the broader air quality programs for SCAG, SCAQMD, and Riverside County local entities. (Policy Goal: Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Monitor the impact of AB32 (greenhouse gas emission reduction) application to Commission transportation projects. • Monitor the impact of SB375 (greenhouse gas emission reduction) from light trucks and automobiles through the implementation of the 2012 RTP/SCS. • Actively participate on the MSRC's TAC to ensure equitable funding is available in support of capital projects within Riverside County. Planning and Programming Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Federal projects monitored for obligation authority delivery 61 19 17 25 TUMF Regional Arterial projects monitored 15 18 18 15 TUMF agreements/amendments 5 5 4 5 FTIP amended projects 287 285 200 225 STIP/Proposition 1B programming, allocations, amendments, and extensions for: Commission projects 2 7 7 3 Local agency projects 18 6 26 13 Rail Mission Statement: "To develop and support passenger rail transportation options for increased mobility within Riverside County and the region." Chart 30 — Rail Capital Outlay 0% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 4% Professional Costs 4% Support Costs 11% Rail expenditures of $15,485,600 include Metrolink operations and capital support as well as maintenance and operations of the five Commission -owned and operated commuter rail stations and the Perris Transit Center (Table 51). Salaries and benefits reflect a 28% increase and is a result of an increase in FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs, which include legal and consultant services, have increased 40% due to on -call rail consultants who will be used to perform service planning and modeling for rail projects including 91 line/Perris Valley Line expansion and Coachella Valley service. Support costs, which reflect a decrease of 1%, include station maintenance, media ads, printing services, and marketing incentives. Station maintenance includes property management, utilities, grounds maintenance, repairs, cleaning, and security services at the five Commission - owned commuter rail stations, adjacent parking structures, and the Perris Transit Center. Projects and operations expenditures of $12,489,200 increased 6% compared to the previous year's budget and include an operating contribution of up to $10,462,500 to SCRRA for Metrolink operations, which includes new service, and $250,000 to connect transit to Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and Corona Cruiser buses. The Commission's commuter rail program intends to utilize existing mechanisms within Metrolink to assess and monitor operations and budget performance. Program operations relate primarily to station operations. Table 51- Rail Expenditure Detail FY11/12 FY12,/13 FY12/13 FY13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Charge Salaries and Benefits $ 486700 $ 496700 $ 613,200 $ 636500 $ 139,8:0 28% Professional Casts Legal Services 158,100 123,000 103,900 102,033 (21,000) -17% Professional Services -General 47,900 atco0 153,030 486003 12a000 63% Total Professional Costs 206 C00 421,0:0 256900 5811003 167,000 40% Support Costs 1,2611100 1,735600 1,455,9:0 1,723,700 (11,9M) -1% Projects and Operations Program Operations 1,398,800 1,39000 1,30Q500 1,471700 76900 6% End need ng 39,500 39,500 5,030 (34,500) -87% Special Studies 21,700 19:4000 - 301000 150,000 100% Operating and Capital Cisburserrents 16836400 10,25Q000 7,241,900 1(17129:0 462500 5% Total Projects andCGperations 18,225,900 31,834,300 9,181,900 12,489,200 664,900 6% Capital Outlay 21,900 66730 56400 48,2C0 (17,500) -27% TC7TALRail M3intenanceand Operations $ 20202,6:0 $ 14,553,300 $ 11,564,303 $ 15,424600 $ 9373oe 6% Rail Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.01 0.12 Capital Projects Manager 0.35 0.40 Chief Financial Officer 0.06 0.04 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.00 0.00 Deputy Executive Director 0.02 0.00 Facilities Administrator 0.00 0.00 Multimodal Services Director 0.23 0.27 Procurement Analyst 0.17 0.30 Procurement Manager 0.29 0.12 Project Delivery Director 0.02 0.01 Rail Manager 1.00 1.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.01 0.01 Staff Analyst 1.03 1.04 0.07 0.35 0.07 0.04 0.00 0.55 0.10 0.32 0.30 0.05 1.00 0.00 1.10 FTE 3.19 3.31 3.95 Department Budget Overview -Rail Operations Department Description The Commission has directed efforts in the areas of regional commuter rail, intercity passenger rail, high speed rail, and capital improvements to support enhanced passenger and freight rail service. The entire program includes elements of planning, programming, commuter rail development and support, station and corridor management, mitigation of community and environmental impacts, legislative and regulatory advocacy, and construction of capital projects. Many elements are managed or supported by other Commission departments, legal counsel, and consultants. Departmental efforts contributing to the rail program are found throughout the budget document. Coordination and consultation also occur with a variety of public and private entities including the CTC, Caltrans, California Public Utilities Commission, California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), Federal Railroad Administration, FTA, Amtrak, environmental agencies, the University of California, transit providers, SCAG, WRCOG, CVAG, San Diego Association of Governments, LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency, local governments, private freight railroads, businesses, and property owners. The Commission participates in the ongoing funding and governance of Metrolink through SCRRA, a joint powers authority consisting of the county transportation commissions of Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura counties. The Commission holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven member board. Commission staff serves on the five -county TAC which negotiates service and funding levels, based upon the County's established priorities. The TAC provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and Commission departments, and linkages to local communities. Of the seven commuter rail lines operated by Metrolink, three routes consisting of the Riverside, Inland Empire - Orange County (IEOC), and 91 Lines directly serve Western County. Unlike the other SCRRA member agencies, the Commission owns and operates the commuter rail stations serving Riverside County: Riverside Downtown, Pedley, La Sierra, West Corona, and North Main Corona (Chart 31). The Commission is also the owner of and the operating partner with RTA at the Perris Transit Center, a multimodal transportation facility. Station operation and maintenance costs are included in the Rail Department budget with services currently coordinated by the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. New and ongoing construction projects at these stations are described in the capital budget managed by the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department. Chart 31— Riverside County Metrolink Station Locations Riverside County Metrolink Service MIRTH VAIN CORONA STATION 1 1 WEST CORONA STATION = PERIT ! SIAM RIVERSIDE - Li SIERRA STATION L, - I EXISTING STATIONS 0 PROPOSED STATIONS i- H-F FFFF METROUNN LINE ii+PH++,,,+ff PROPOSED PERRIS VALLEY LINE (: RIVERSIDE HUNTED PARK STATION RIIT PEE DOWNTOWN STATION W,IA� .in* DOWNTOWN PERRIS sTATION Mpi,Et,i: VALLEY PERRIS bra Y SOUTH PERRIS STATION;) 111611 r8r1 �• 1 fr. Key Assumptions • Metrolink's preliminary FY 2013/14 budget is adopted by the Commission and SCRRA. In the event that additional funds are needed during the budget year, a mid -year budget adjustment will be presented to the Commission for approval. • Ridership and fare revenues continue to grow slightly on the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 Lines (Chart 32). ■ The Commission manages the station security guard contract. Estimated costs are based on the actual contract terms with a portion reimbursed by SCRRA. Chart 32 — Metrolink Average Daily Ridership 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Accomplishments 2012 2013 2014 ■ 91 Line ■ IEOC ■ Riverside/LA • Added a fifth new peak period round-trip train on the IEOC service, which is the first added peak train in over a decade on this line. This provides greater options for daily commuters. • Actively participated on the LOSSAN board and supported efforts for local control for the Southern California intercity rail service. • Continued to implement the recommendations of the comprehensive safety and security assessment and emergency response plan at the Metrolink stations. • Successfully oversaw the new security guard contractor while implementing tougher standards and accountability in the security program. Significant improvements have been realized with more detailed and responsive reporting and monitoring of station facilities. • Supported the holiday toy train event at the La Sierra and North Main Corona rail stations. The community continues to support this event with strong local participation. This event also generates needed donations for the Spark of Love Toy Drive for local charities. Major Initiatives Over the last 20 years, more than $110 million in capital improvements have been made in developing stations and securing access to support the Commission's commuter rail services operations. The development of the Perris Valley Line project and its operational impacts will continue to be pursued and evaluated, respectively. The four Perris Valley Line stations (see Chart 31) are currently completely designed. In addition, continued efforts are underway to expand peak period rail service on the IEOC and 91 Lines to better meet the needs of Inland Empire commuters. Department Goals —Rail Operations Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving Riverside County. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Support improved Metrolink system safety and security initiatives. • Implement enhanced safety and security features at all stations. • Work with Metrolink staff to increase patronage on Riverside County lines. • Continue to expand service on Metrolink lines with increased train frequencies. • Coordinate with Metrolink staff to develop future service plans to best meet the needs of Riverside County residents. " C o n t i n u e t o m o n i t o r M e t r o l i n k ' s f i n a n c i a l p e r f o r m a n c e t o e n s u r e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f u n d s a r e u s e d e f f i c i e n t l y a n d r e s p o n s i b l y . M a x i m i z e o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r p u b l i c u s e o f r a i l - r e l a t e d i n v e s t m e n t . ( P o l i c y G o a l : I n t e r m o d a l i s m & A c c e s s i b i l i t y ) O b j e c t i v e s : " S u p p o r t t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r e f f o r t s t o e x p a n d a v a i l a b i l i t y a n d u s e o f c o n n e c t i n g t r a n s i t i n o r d e r t o i m p r o v e a c c e s s a n d r e d u c e d e m a n d o n p a r k i n g c a p a c i t y ; c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t r a n s f e r s a r e c u r r e n t l y r e i m b u r s e d t o t h e t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d a r e b u d g e t e d . " E x p l o r e t r a c k r i g h t s o p p o r t u n i t i e s . " E x p a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s w i t h t h e C o m m u t e r A s s i s t a n c e P r o g r a m ' s p a r k a n d r i d e o p e r a t i o n s f o r t h e d e s i g n a t i o n o f s p e c i f i c c a r / v a n p o o l / b u s p o o l p a r k i n g a t c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n s w i t h a v a i l a b l e c a p a c i t y . " E x p a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r i n t e r l i n e t r a v e l t h r o u g h c o o r d i n a t i o n o f s c h e d u l e s w i t h A m t r a k i n t e r c i t y a n d l o n g d i s t a n c e t r a i n s , s u c h a s t h e S u n s e t L i m i t e d , a n d o t h e r M e t r o l i n k l i n e s , i n c l u d i n g e n c o u r a g i n g j o i n t t i c k e t i n g o p t i o n s . I m p l e m e n t e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t s y s t e m s a n d g e n e r a t e r e v e n u e t o o f f s e t m a i n t e n a n c e c o s t s o f r a i l p r o p e r t i e s . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : E n v i r o n m e n t a l S t e w a r d s h i p , F i n a n c i a l & A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) O b j e c t i v e s : " E x p l o r e t r a c k r i g h t s o p p o r t u n i t i e s a n d p o t e n t i a l f o r j o i n t d e v e l o p m e n t o p p o r t u n i t i e s a t s t a t i o n s . " E x p l o r e t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n o f c e l l p h o n e t o w e r s a s a r e v e n u e s o u r c e t o o f f s e t o p e r a t i n g c o s t s . " E x p l o r e a d d i t i o n a l r e v e n u e p o t e n t i a l a t t h e r a i l s t a t i o n s . " E v a l u a t e a l t e r n a t i v e a n d e m e r g e n c y p o w e r s y s t e m s . D e p a r t m e n t B u d g e t O v e r v i e w R a i l D e v e l o p m e n t I n o r d e r t o e x p a n d p a s s e n g e r r a i l o p t i o n s t h r o u g h o u t t h e C o u n t y , t h e C o m m i s s i o n c o n d u c t s f e a s i b i l i t y s t u d i e s t o a s s e s s t h e v i a b i l i t y o f c o m m u t e r r a i l e x p a n s i o n . I n 2 0 0 5 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n c o m p l e t e d t h e c o m m u t e r r a i l f e a s i b i l i t y s t u d y t h a t e x a m i n e d t h e v i a b i l i t y o f e x t e n d i n g M e t r o l i n k c o m m u t e r r a i l s e r v i c e l a r g e l y w i t h i n e x i s t i n g r a i l r i g h t s o f w a y . T h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d t h e s t u d y a n d r e c o m m e n d e d a d v a n c e d s t u d y o f e x t e n s i o n s o n t h e S J B L t o H e m e t / S a n J a c i n t o a n d M u r r i e t a / T e m e c u l a . T h e n e x t p h a s e o f A l t e r n a t i v e s A n a l y s i s f o r t h e s e c o r r i d o r s w i l l b e p u r s u e d i n f u t u r e y e a r s a s f u n d i n g a v a i l a b i l i t y a l l o w s . S a n J a c i n t o B r a n c h L i n e T h e C o m m i s s i o n h o l d s t i t l e t o a n d m a n a g e s t h e 3 8 - m i l e S J B L ( C h a r t 3 3 ) a n d s e v e r a l a d j a c e n t p r o p e r t i e s , p r e s e r v e d f o r f u t u r e p a s s e n g e r r a i l s e r v i c e . B N S F R a i l r o a d h o l d s t h e f r e i g h t r i g h t s i n t h e c o r r i d o r , p r o v i d i n g s e r v i c e t o l o c a l s h i p p e r s , a n d p e r f o r m s m a i n t e n a n c e o n t h e l i n e . Chart 33 — San Jacinto Branch Line k mow• SAM !ACM M CF !MARCH L iMM VORAn YAL[AY .mac- MlNp1S � SA AMID Perris Valley Line Small Starts Project In June 2000, the Commission allocated $20 million of Measure A funds for capital and operating expenditures related to the implementation of passenger rail service on the initial operating segment of the SJBL, known as the Perris Valley Line (see Chart 31). Project cost estimates have been revised and are now approximately $248 million. Staff is seeking a small starts grant agreement from the FTA Small Starts Program to fund $75 million of the project cost with the balance to be funded by other federal, state, and local funding sources, as illustrated in Table 52 and Chart 34. Since 2008, $75 million in Small Starts funding has been federally appropriated. Details on this capital project are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery section. Chart 34 — Perris Valley Line Funding Chart Mr;1:1; 1 it#. Table 52 — Perris Valley Line Funding Plan Total Federal: STP $ 500,000 FTA 5307 36,514,263 FTA 5309 Small Starts 75,000,000 CMAQ 26,157,453 State: STI P 52,978,000 Local: Measure A 57,100,869 Total Perris Valley Line Project Estimate $ 248,250,585 The project has received FTA approval to begin project development and advance preliminary engineering. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) draft environmental assessment was circulated for public review in 2004, and a new Supplemental Environmental Assessment was released in 2010 and again in 2012. The CEQA document was finalized in 2011, and final NEPA approval was obtained in May 2012. The FY 2013/14 budget in the Capital Project Development and Delivery section includes total expenditures of $147 million for the Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. The public outreach program for this project continues to be a priority with ongoing efforts to reach all the communities including residents, businesses, and schools along the corridor. Passenger Rail to the Pass Area and Coachella Valley In recent years the Commission has also focused attention on the creation of intercity passenger rail service between the Coachella Valley, the Pass Area, Riverside, and the Los Angeles basin through advocacy efforts with state, federal, and local government entities and negotiation with the freight railroads. The Commission's current efforts include ensuring the corridor is prominently featured in the updated California State Rail Plan and that a Service Development Plan is pursued. The Commission has worked closely with CVAG in recent years to update the feasibility studies to include current cost and travel time information. There has been enhanced coordination with CVAG, Amtrak, and the State on this project. High Speed Rail The Commission continues to play a proactive role in the development of a statewide, high speed passenger rail system, including routing of the backbone corridor through the Inland Empire with possible stations in the Riverside/Corona and Murrieta/Temecula areas. With the passage of Proposition 1A in November 2008, there is now a proposed funding mechanism to move the state high speed rail project forward. The CHSRA has begun work on a project level environmental assessment and corridor alignment study for the section between Los Angeles and San Diego via the Inland Empire. The Commission has directed the review to include an alignment alternative along 1-15 for analysis. The Commission has entered into a MOU to be supportive in the development of this high speed rail project and is participating in the Southern California Inland Corridor Group meetings. The Commission actively contributed to the development of the supplemental Alternatives Analysis released in spring 2012 and continues to coordinate local participation at Technical Working Group meetings attended by local stakeholders. Work on this effort has slowed down with the release of the latest business plan that extends the development of this Phase II section from Los Angeles to San Diego via the Inland Empire to beyond 2030. The Commission signed a MOU along with the other Southern California transportation entities and SCAG to commit $1 billion in unallocated Proposition lA funds for early investment to be spent locally for rail transportation improvement projects. Key Assumptions • Project development on the Perris Valley Line will continue in FY 2013/14. Accomplishments • Having received a medium -high rating from the FTA on the Perris Valley Line in December 2007, continued project development activities including progress on environmental documents and the related public reviews. The project is now complete with final design. • Worked with the on -call rail consultant bench to provide detailed schedules and models for proposed 91 and IEOC line service expansion proposals. Major Initiatives As discussed above, project development and right of way acquisition related to the Perris Valley Line project is expected to continue. Department Goals —Rail Development Identify and plan for capital improvements necessary to increase the scope, appeal, and reliability of commuter rail operations. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue efforts to fully fund the Perris Valley Line. • Finalize the station design elements for the Perris Valley Line. • Continue to review parking requirements and develop plans to address projected parking deficiencies. Maintain efforts with local agencies, other Southern California counties, and the state and federal governments to expand intercity passenger rail service into Riverside County and the Coachella Valley. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Continue to support and influence state efforts in the creation of a high speed passenger rail system along an Inland Empire alignment through coordination with state and local agencies. In addition, continue to identify and advocate for high speed rail funding to be spent on beneficial local rail projects in Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Rail Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated Average daily ridership on existing commuter lines • Riverside Line • IEOC Line • 91 Line 5,279 4,142 2,254 FY 11/12 Actual 5,205 3,825 2,265 FY 12/13 Estimated 5,456 4,073 2,465 FY 13/14 Projected 5,070 4,397 2,503 Farebox recovery ratio • Riverside Line • IEOC Line • 91 Line 58.5% 31.3% 49.7% 60.6% 32.1% 53.4% 60.9% 37.2% 48.5% 58.6% 36.5% 45.2% Public and Specialized Transit Mission Statement: "To coordinate the operation of all public transportation services within the County with a goal toward promoting compliance and improving mobility as well as program efficiency and effectiveness between transit operators. To maintain and improve, as resources allow, mobility options for seniors, persons with disabilities, and persons of limited means to enhance quality of life through innovative solutions and better coordination of existing services." Chart 35 — Public and Specialized Transit Salaries and Benefits Transfers Out 10 12% _ Expenditures Public and specialized transit uses are budgeted at $120,770,000 for FY 2013/14, as presented in Table 53, and consist primarily of capital projects and operations costs as well as transfers out to Commission funds for administration, planning, and rail purposes. Salaries and benefits reflect a 17% increase as a result of an increase in FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. LTF disbursements consist of transit operating and capital allocations to public transit operators of $67,439,000, bicycle and pedestrian facilities allocations to cities and the County of $1,280,000, and planning and administration allocations to other agencies of $555,800. STA disbursements of $25,602,000 are for bus capital purposes in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. Transfers out comprise $8,391,100 for rail operations and capital, $2,600,000 for grade separation projects, $2,175,000 for planning, and $800,000 for administration. The LTF transit allocations reflect the use of $10,276,400 in fund balances. Measure A disbursements include $2,725,400 for Western County specialized transit funding of the first year of the 2013 two-year call for projects. The majority of other Measure A disbursements relate to 2013 Measure A public transit programs: $722,600 for Western County Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) allocations, $5,500,000 for Coachella Valley public and specialized transit, and $2,386,000 for Western County intercity bus services. The Western County allocations are disbursed monthly to RTA, the major transit provider in the Western County, while the Coachella Valley allocation is disbursed monthly to SunLine, the major transit provider in the Coachella Valley. Table 53 — Public and Specialized Transit Expenditure Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 326,600 $ 326,200 $ 296,100 $ 380,100 $ 53,900 17% Professional Costs Legal Services 8,400 28,500 21,600 23,500 (5,000) -18% Audit Services 100,000 98,000 (100,000) -100% Professional Services - General 137,700 163,000 155,000 165,000 2,000 1% Total Professional Costs 146,100 291,500 274,600 188,500 (103,000) -35% Support Costs 8,400 18,900 13,500 24,500 5,600 30% Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements 52,677,000 84,174,600 58,822,300 106,210,800 22,036,200 26% Total Projects and Operations 52,677,000 84,174,600 58,822,300 106,210,800 22,036,200 26% Transfers Out 14,910.500 19.632.600 18.336.400 13.966.100 (5,666,500) -29% TOTAL Public and Specialized Transit $ 68,068,600 $ 104,443,M $ 77,742,900 $ 120,770,000 $ 16,326,200 16% Public and Specialized Transit Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.09 0.10 Chief Financial Officer 0.10 0.08 Executive Director 0.03 0.01 Multimodal Services Director 0.27 0.20 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.00 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.00 Staff Analyst 1.00 1.00 Transit Manager 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.20 0.03 0.02 1.00 1.00 FTE 2.49 2.39 2.45 Department Budget Overview Department Description The Measure A specialized transit program provides a valuable service to the community by serving the needs of commuters, mainly seniors and persons with disabilities, whose transportation needs are not met by traditional services. Specialized transit operations are typically managed by social service and nonprofit agencies. The Commission also allocates funding, following a competitive call for projects, through the FTA Section 5310 program that is administered by Caltrans. This program provides funding to nonprofit transportation and social service agencies and public operators under special circumstances for the purchase of capital equipment. With the passage of SAFETEA-LU and subsequent inclusion also in MAP-21, the following are two relatively new federal funding sources for specialized transit services: • JARC (Section 5316) program provides funding for the development and maintenance of jobs access projects to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from work during non - peak hours as well as provide reverse commute options for workers in suburban areas. • New Freedom (Section 5317) program provides funding for new public transportation services and alternatives for people with disabilities beyond the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. Eligibility for the above federal funds requires recipients to comply with all federal coordinated planning requirements in accordance with SAFETEA-LU and MAP-21 provisions. Projects selected for funding under these programs must be derived from a locally -developed Coordinated Plan and must be developed through a process that includes representatives of the public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human service providers. The update of the Coordinated Plan was completed in April 2012, and the third Universal Call for Projects was issued in November 2012. Approval of Measure A and JARC/New Freedom grant awards under the 2013 Universal Call for Projects was obtained in April 2013 for the Western County and Coachella Valley applicants, and approved projects will begin provision of services on July 1, 2013. The Commission is responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming. Planning includes the development of the countywide SRTPs for eight public transit operators consisting of the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; SCRRA's Metrolink commuter rail; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency; RTA; and SunLine. The Commission assists in coordinating the annual development, review, and approval of the operator SRTPs and allocates Measure A, LTF, STA, and FTA Sections 5307, 5309, 5311, 5316, and 5317 transit funding resources to public transit programs. The Commission is responsible for the disbursement of Measure A, LTF, and STA funds, while federal transit funds are administered by the FTA. In partnership with the County's transit operators, the Commission coordinates the allocation of available Proposition 1B transit (capital and security) funding and ensures that proposed projects meet the mobility needs of the County. Proposition 1B funds are annually appropriated by the legislature and used for transit related capital purchases, infrastructure/facility improvements, and security enhancements. The Riverside County operators annually apply for Proposition 1B funds; however, due to the state's ongoing financial condition, the release of funds is contingent upon available proceeds from future bond sales. The Commission has public transit operator oversight and fiduciary responsibilities to ensure that annual fiscal audits and a state triennial performance audit are conducted in accordance with TDA regulations. The Commission is also charged with annually reviewing public transit operator activities and recommending potential productivity improvements to lower operating costs. To ensure that specialized transit allocations are expended and required service goals are met in accordance with funding agreements, the Commission engages an audit firm to perform certain agreed -upon procedures for the Measure A specialized transit funding recipients, some of which also receive Section 5310, JARC and New Freedom funds. Key Assumptions • LTF, STA, and Measure A disbursements are based on projected budgetary allocations but may be adjusted after the Commission approves actual allocations in July 2013. • Fluctuating of LTF and Measure A sales tax revenues will continue to require efforts to streamline operating expenses by all operators while maintaining efficiency and quality of service. • Transit Vision, adopted by the Commission in June 2008, established a 25% allocation of 2009 Measure A Western County specialized transit funds to the RTA as the CTSA for Western County. Accomplishments • Oversaw the successful second -year implementation of the ongoing specialized transit services resulting from the 2011 Universal Call for Projects funding allocation process. • Received approval notification of 20 capital projects awarded to five successful Riverside County recipients of funding under the FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/11 FTA Section 5310 program. Projects were derived from a locally -developed Coordinated Plan. • Incorporated FY 2010/11 Proposition 1B Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) funds with trarisit capital funding sources following Caltrans' release of program funding covering a three-year period need for fiscal years 2010/11— 2012/13. • Approved allocation of FY 2012/13 Proposition 1B California Transit Security Grant Program —California Transit Assistance Funds for eligible transit safety and security projects identified by transit operators following release of program funding and guidelines by the California Emergency Management Agency. • Contracted an outside auditor to conduct the triennial performance audits of the Commission and the seven transit operators in Riverside County that receive TDA funds. " I s s u e d t h e 2 0 1 3 C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s f u n d i n g a l l o c a t i o n s f o r s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 a n d F Y 2 0 1 4 / 1 5 a n d a w a r d e d g r a n t s . M a j o r I n i t i a t i v e s T h e C o m m i s s i o n h a s l o n g d e m o n s t r a t e d a s t r o n g c o m m i t m e n t t o a s s i s t i n t h e m o b i l i t y o f t h o s e w i t h s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t n e e d s . T h r o u g h i t s 1 9 8 9 M e a s u r e A s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t p r o g r a m , t h e C o m m i s s i o n p r o v i d e d m i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s t o p u b l i c a n d n o n p r o f i t t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s f o r t h e p r o v i s i o n o f s p e c i a l t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s t o i m p r o v e t h e m o b i l i t y o f s e n i o r s a n d p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s . A l o n g w i t h s u p p o r t o f t r a d i t i o n a l d i a l - a - r i d e s e r v i c e s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n s u p p o r t s i n n o v a t i v e p r o g r a m s t h a t p r o v i d e t r a n s i t a s s i s t a n c e i n h a r d t o s e r v e r u r a l a r e a s o r f o r r i d e r s h a v i n g v e r y s p e c i a l t r a n s i t n e e d s . T h e r i d e r s , m a n y f r a i l a n d e l d e r l y , h a v e c o m e t o d e p e n d o n t h e s e s e r v i c e s t h a t p r o v i d e a h i g h e r l e v e l o f a s s i s t a n c e t h a n c a n b e p r o v i d e d b y t h e p u b l i c t r a n s i t p r o v i d e r s a n d / o r o p e r a t e i n a r e a s n o t s e r v e d b y p u b l i c t r a n s i t . A s a r e s u l t o f t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A , t h e s e s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t p r o g r a m s w i l l c o n t i n u e t h r o u g h 2 0 3 9 . I n J u n e 2 0 1 3 , 1 7 p r o g r a m s i n W e s t e r n C o u n t y a n d f o u r p r o g r a m s i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y w i l l c o m p l e t e t h e i r s e c o n d y e a r o f s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s u n d e r t h e 2 0 1 1 U n i v e r s a l C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s , i n c l u d i n g t h e n o n - e m e r g e n c y m e d i c a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m p o n e n t . I n A p r i l 2 0 1 3 , 1 7 p r o g r a m s i n W e s t e r n C o u n t y a n d f i v e p r o g r a m s i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y w e r e a w a r d e d g r a n t s u n d e r t h e 2 0 1 3 U n i v e r s a l C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s . T h i r t e e n o f t h e s e p r o j e c t s a r e f u l l y f u n d e d w i t h M e a s u r e A f u n d s , w h i l e t h e o t h e r n i n e p r o j e c t s w i l l b e f u n d e d b y a m i x o f M e a s u r e A , J A R C , a n d N e w F r e e d o m f u n d s . A s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e C o o r d i n a t e d P l a n , t h e s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t p r o j e c t s a p p r o v e d f o r f u n d i n g w i l l r e q u i r e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n a n d y e a r l o n g p e r f o r m a n c e m o n i t o r i n g d u r i n g F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 a n d F Y 2 0 1 4 / 1 5 . T o m a i n t a i n f u n d i n g s t a b i l i t y o f M e a s u r e A , L T F a n d S T A f u n d i n g f r o m t h e s t a t e , s t a f f w i l l c o n t i n u e m o n i t o r i n g l o n g - r a n g e p l a n n i n g a c t i v i t i e s t o e n s u r e t h a t b o t h a n t i c i p a t e d r e v e n u e s a n d o n - h a n d r e s e r v e s a r e p r o p e r l y u t i l i z e d a n d i n l i n e w i t h p r o j e c t e d l e v e l s o f s e r v i c e b y t h e p u b l i c o p e r a t o r s . S t a f f w i l l a l s o w o r k w i t h t h e o p e r a t o r s t o p l a n a n d c o o r d i n a t e m a j o r c a p i t a l p u r c h a s e s a n d i n v e s t m e n t s i n t o n e w r o l l i n g s t o c k a n d o t h e r s y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t s i n o r d e r t o m a i n t a i n a v i a b l e o n - h a n d r e s e r v e . D e p a r t m e n t G o a l s P r o v i d e t i m e l y i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e p u b l i c r e g a r d i n g C o m m i s s i o n - i m p l e m e n t e d p r o j e c t s a n d s u p p o r t p u b l i c r e l a t i o n s a c t i v i t i e s o f M e a s u r e A , J A R C , a n d N e w F r e e d o m f u n d e d p r o g r a m s b y g r a n t r e c i p i e n t s . ( P o l i c y G o a l : C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e s : " C o m p l e t e c o n t r a c t a g r e e m e n t e x e c u t i o n p r o c e s s e s a n d s t a r t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f p r o j e c t s a w a r d e d u n d e r t h e 2 0 1 3 U n i v e r s a l C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s b e g i n n i n g J u l y 1 , 2 0 1 3 . " P r o d u c e a n d d i s t r i b u t e p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n m a t e r i a l s a s n e e d e d i n c l u d i n g p r e s s r e l e a s e s , f l y e r s , b r o c h u r e s , m a r k e t i n g m a t e r i a l s , a n d n e w s p a p e r a d s . I n a d d i t i o n , s t a f f w i l l a l s o l e v e r a g e t h e 1 E 5 1 1 t r a v e l e r i n f o r m a t i o n s y s t e m i n o r d e r t o m o r e f u l l y m a r k e t t h e a v a i l a b i l i t y o f s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t p r o g r a m s . A l l o c a t e M e a s u r e A S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t a n d f e d e r a l f u n d s t o s u p p o r t s e r v i c e s t h a t w i l l m a i n t a i n a n d / o r e n h a n c e m o b i l i t y b y a l l e v i a t i n g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n b a r r i e r s f o r s e n i o r s , p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s , a n d t h e t r u l y n e e d y . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y , I n t e r m o d a l i s m & A c c e s s i b i l i t y , F i n a n c i a l & A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) O b j e c t i v e s : " M o n i t o r p e r f o r m a n c e o f s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t g r a n t r e c i p i e n t s t h r o u g h a n a l y s i s o f t h e i r m o n t h l y p e r f o r m a n c e r e p o r t s . " S u p p o r t t h e F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 , 5 3 1 6 a n d 5 3 1 7 g r a n t p r o c e s s e s t o i m p r o v e m o b i l i t y f o r s e n i o r s , p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s a n d i n d i v i d u a l s o f l i m i t e d m e a n s b y w o r k i n g w i t h C a l t r a n s , p u b l i c o p e r a t o r s , a n d s o c i a l s e r v i c e a g e n c i e s t o e n s u r e a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c e s s s t a t e w i d e f o r t h e a l l o c a t i o n o f f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n d o l l a r s f o r s o c i a l s e r v i c e p r o g r a m s . " P r o v i d e t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e a n d p r o g r a m s u p p o r t t o a g e n c i e s o f f e r i n g s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t p r o g r a m s t o e n s u r e t h e m a x i m u m b e n e f i t o f f u n d i n g f o r i m p r o v e d m o b i l i t y f o r s e n i o r s , p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s , a n d i n d i v i d u a l s o f l i m i t e d m e a n s . " S e e k C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l o n f u n d i n g a l l o c a t i o n s f o r t h e U n i v e r s a l C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s e v e r y t w o y e a r s . C o o r d i n a t e t h e o p e r a t i o n o f a l l p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e s w i t h i n t h e C o u n t y w i t h a g o a l t o w a r d p r o m o t i n g p r o g r a m e f f i c i e n c y a n d h a r m o n y b e t w e e n t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s a s o u t l i n e d i n s t a t e l a w . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y , S y s t e m E f f i c i e n c i e s , I n t e r m o d a l i s m & A c c e s s i b i l i t y , F i n a n c i a l & A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) O b j e c t i v e s : " R e v i e w t r a n s i t p l a n n i n g , r e s o u r c e a l l o c a t i o n , a n d s e r v i c e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n p o l i c y r e q u i r e m e n t s i n c l u d i n g a p p r o p r i a t e c o o r d i n a t i o n o f c o m m u t e r r a i l , i n t e r c o u n t y a n d i n t e r c i t y b u s , l o c a l b u s a n d p a r a t r a n s i t , a n d s o c i a l s e r v i c e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e s t o e n s u r e c o n v e n i e n t s e r v i c e f o r p a s s e n g e r s . " I m p l e m e n t r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s r e s u l t i n g f r o m t h e T D A - m a n d a t e d t r i e n n i a l p e r f o r m a n c e a u d i t s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e s e v e n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s . " A s s u r e t h e o n g o i n g e f f e c t i v e n e s s o f t h e S R T P p r o c e s s a n d w o r k w i t h t h e C o u n t y ' s e i g h t t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s t o a s s u r e p r o d u c t i v i t y a n d e f f i c i e n c y a s w e l l a s c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e p r o d u c t i v i t y i m p r o v e m e n t p r o g r a m . " C o o r d i n a t e r e g i o n a l t r a n s i t c o n n e c t i o n s a m o n g c o m m u t e r r a i l , b u s e s , a n d p a r a t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s t o e n s u r e c o n v e n i e n t s e r v i c e f o r p a s s e n g e r s . " M o n i t o r t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s ' q u a r t e r l y c a p i t a l g r a n t s r e p o r t s . " M o n i t o r t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s ' p e r f o r m a n c e t h r o u g h a n a l y s i s o f t h e i r q u a r t e r l y p e r f o r m a n c e r e p o r t s u s i n g t h e T r a n s T r a c k c o m p u t e r - b a s e d t r a c k i n g p r o g r a m . C o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e s t a f f r e s o u r c e s t o a s s i s t a n d s u p p o r t t h e c o o r d i n a t i o n o f t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s w i t h i n t h e C o u n t y a n d t h r o u g h o u t t h e S t a t e . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y , S y s t e m E f f i c i e n c i e s , I n t e r m o d a l i s m & A c c e s s i b i l i t y , C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e s : " P a r t i c i p a t e a n d i n f l u e n c e i n t e r c o u n t y d i s c u s s i o n s b e t w e e n R i v e r s i d e , O r a n g e , a n d S a n D i e g o c o u n t i e s r e g a r d i n g t h e e n h a n c e m e n t o f i n t e r m o d a l o p t i o n s . T h i s i n c l u d e s a d d i t i o n a l t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s ( r a i l a n d e x p r e s s b u s ) a n d r i d e s h a r e s e r v i c e s . " R e g u l a r l y p a r t i c i p a t e i n m e e t i n g s t h a t f o c u s o n t h e c o o r d i n a t i o n o f t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s , s u c h a s t h e C a l i f o r n i a A s s o c i a t i o n f o r C o o r d i n a t e d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n , S u n L i n e ' s A c c e s s C o m m i t t e e , R T A ' s A D A C o m m i t t e e , t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y F o u n d a t i o n o n A g i n g B o a r d o f D i r e c t o r s , t h e O l d e r C a l i f o r n i a n T r a f f i c S a f e t y T a s k F o r c e , a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s C i t i z e n s A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e / S o c i a l S e r v i c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l . " C o n t i n u e t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f a m a r k e t i n g a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n n e t w o r k f o r c o m m u n i c a t i n g s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t m o b i l i t y o p t i o n s t o s e n i o r s , t h e d i s a b l e d , a n d p e r s o n s o f l i m i t e d m e a n s . P u b l i c a n d S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t P e r f o r m a n c e / W o r k l o a d I n d i c a t o r s F Y 1 1 / 1 2 E s t i m a t e d F Y 1 1 / 1 2 A c t u a l F Y 1 2 / 1 3 E s t i m a t e d F Y 1 3 / 1 4 P r o j e c t e d S R T P s s u b m i t t e d b y o p e r a t o r s a n d r e v i e w e d 8 8 8 8 S R T P a m e n d m e n t s 3 3 3 3 S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t g r a n t s a w a r d e d 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 4 O n e - w a y t r i p s p r o v i d e d b y M e a s u r e A f u n d e d p r o j e c t s 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 5 0 , 9 0 0 1 5 2 , 0 0 0 1 5 5 , 0 0 0 O n e - w a y t r i p s p r o v i d e d b y J A R C & N e w F r e e d o m f u n d e d a g e n c i e s 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 9 6 , 0 0 0 1 7 1 , 0 0 0 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 O n e - w a y t r i p s r e i m b u r s e d t h r o u g h t h e W e s t e r n C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n R e i m b u r s e m e n t a n d I n f o r m a t i o n P r o j e c t 7 5 , 0 0 0 8 2 , 3 8 3 8 3 , 7 0 0 8 4 , 0 0 0 T r a n s i t t i c k e t s p r o v i d e d t h r o u g h t h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A c c e s s P r o g r a m 6 4 , 9 7 6 6 5 , 2 6 3 6 4 , 5 0 0 6 5 , 0 0 0 C l i e n t s s e r v e d t h r o u g h B l i n d n e s s S u p p o r t S e r v i c e s 4 2 3 6 3 0 3 0 Commuter Assistance Mission Statement: "To encourage and promote transportation alternatives for commuters through employer partnerships, information services, technological innovation, and community outreach." Chart 36 — Commuter Assistance TFansfers Out Salaries and 2%, Benefits 7Y, Expenditures Commuter Assistance expenditures and transfers out total $4,523,900, which represents an 8% increase from last year's budget (Table 54). Salaries and benefits of $300,800 reflect a 37% increase due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $817,800 have increased 26% over the prior year due to the enhancements on the regional ridematching database. Support costs totaling $483,300 include mail and printing services, computer and vehicle maintenance, communications, and other office expenditures. Projects and operations expenditures of $2,802,800 consist of park and ride lease payments of $150,000, regional transportation consultant services totaling $1,880,500 to manage and implement the program, and merchant vouchers valued at $772,300. Capital outlay expenditures include $7,000 to upgrade the hardware and network to enhance the equipment in the commuter exchange vehicle and to purchase equipment for local back up of the regional ridematching database. Reimbursements from local county transportation commissions for regional rideshare services provided by the Commission are included in revenues to offset these expenditures. Transfers out consist of $112,200 to the General fund for costs related to maintenance of the park and ride facility at the Perris Transit Center. Table 54 -Commuter Assistance Uses Detail FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 216,030 $ 218,900 $ 375,200 $ 301800 $ 81,930 37% Professional Costs Legal Services 3Z500 25,000 25,000 25,003 0% Professional Services - General 555,500 625,300 729,800 792.800 167.500 27% Total Professional Costs 588,000 650,300 754,800 817,803 167,500 26'A Support Costs 366,903 529,200 469,103 423,300 (45,900) -9% Projects and Operations Program Operations 1,986,700 Z623,400 Z589.303 Z802,800 179,400 7i;, Total Projects and Operations 1,986,700 Z623,400 2,588,300 2,802,800 179,403 7% Capital Outlay 17,000 10,000 7,000 (10,000) -59% Transfers Out 1E0,000 151,300 151,300 112,200 (39100) -26% TOTAL Commuter Assistance $ 3,317,600 $ 4.190,100 $ 4,348,700 $ 4523,900 $ 333,E00 8% Commuter Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.11 0.15 Chief Financial Officer 0.01 0.01 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.58 0.58 Deputy Executive Director 0.01 0.00 Multimodal Services Director 0.27 0.27 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.01 Procurement Manager 0.01 0.04 Staff Analyst 0.60 0.55 0.20 0.01 0.54 0.04 0.47 0.02 0.02 0.54 FTE 1.59 1.61 1.84 Department Budget Overview Department Description While much of the Commission's work is focused on increasing transportation infrastructure and capacity, there is significant value in ensuring that the transportation systems are used efficiently. To help foster more efficient use of these systems, the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program seeks to encourage Riverside County constituents and commuters to make a mode -shift decision away from single occupancy vehicle commuting and into alternative modes of transportation such as a carpool, vanpool, buspool, public bus, Metrolink, walking, bicycling, or telecommuting. The Commuter Assistance Program seeks to efficiently influence driver behavior by fostering a mode -shifting decision at both the employer and commuter levels via the following methods: • The provision of employer services to foster the implementation of employer -based mode -shift and rideshare programs; • The use of incentives both for beginning and then maintaining a mode-shift/rideshare arrangement; • Public information services including the dissemination of personalized commute options and traveler information to educate commuters of all travel options available and to foster congestion avoidance behavior when traveling; and • Leverage technology to deliver easy to use online resources and tools to more efficiently serve employer partners, their employees, and all other commuters. The Commission's Commuter Assistance Program was implemented as a specific requirement under Measure A to address congestion mitigation. While ridesharing has a beneficial impact on air quality, first and foremost, it is a strategy to improve mobility through increased use of alternative travel modes. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue to contract with a consulting firm to administer the Commuter Assistance Program. • Maintaining its long-term partnership with the Commission, SANBAG will contract with the Commission to manage and implement a "sister" Commuter Assistance Program for its residents and employers in San Bernardino County. • At the regional level, four -county transportation commissions' (Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Ventura) will contract with the Commission for the provision of regional ridematching database operations. Accomplishments • Developed a new and more cost effective ridematching system with new features that will launch in FY 2013/14. In addition, the new hosted ridematching system will no longer require hardware or a network administrator to maintain it. • Continued to operate the report card program for both program participants and employer partners which translates individual or worksite rideshare participation into money saved, congestion reduced, and emissions reduced. This outreach is intended to recognize rideshare efforts and to motivate participants to continue ridesharing and/or grow employer program participation. • Increased participation and use of on-line services by employer partners. • Continued to operate, maintain, and enhance the regional ridematching system on behalf of the five -county region. • Continued use of the Program Measurement Tool to evaluate program performance. • Continued to provide rideshare services to employers and commuters in the Coachella Valley, leveraging JARC funds. • Renewed leases for park and ride facilities with the following locations: Canyon Community Church of the Nazarene (Corona), Living Truth Christian Fellowship (Corona), Corona Friends Church (Corona), Elsinore Naval Military School (Lake Elsinore), Lake Elsinore Outlets (Lake Elsinore), Revival Christian Fellowship (Menifee), Mount San Jacinto College (San Jacinto), Hope Lutheran Church (Temecula), Orchard Christian Fellowship (Temecula), and the United Methodist Church (Temecula). • Continued partnering with the Rail Department to provide a permitted section of park and ride spaces in the city of Corona at the North Main Corona station. Major Initiatives A cornerstone of the Commuter Assistance Program is its continued partnership among commuters, employers, and government. The partnership, based on voluntary efforts, makes a collective difference in increasing the efficiency of the County's transportation system —local roads, freeways, commuter rail, and public bus. The combined effort results in less congestion, decreased vehicle miles traveled, and improved air quality. The major initiatives to continue these partnerships and efforts in FY 2013/14 are described below. Grow Employer Partnerships: Given that the highest percentage of rideshare arrangements is formed at work sites, voluntary employer participation is critical to address congestion and air quality goals; employers are the conduit to directly influence their employees' personal transportation choices. The ongoing success of the core Western County rideshare program and the explosive success of the now six -year old Coachella Valley rideshare program demonstration is a testament to the significance of employer partnerships in the program's success. However, the current economic environment will pose challenges in terms of maintaining and/or growing these partnerships. Employer Transportation Coordinators (ETCs) have to do more with less. Delivery of value-added services and tools to make the ETC's job easier will be a critical motivation to continue the partnership. Roll Out New Program Tools: The Commission is continuously looking for opportunities to enhance the suite of services and outreach to both the program participants and employer partners to improve participation, partnerships, and program efficiencies. Commuter Assistance will launch its new ridematching software in FY 2013/14. As part of this effort, the program will feature brand new services, including state-of-the-art trip planning, individual user profiles, and a customizable employer portal for ETCs to more effectively manage their company's rideshare programs. Support Multimodal Travel: In addition to ridematching, information services, and incentives to facilitate ridesharing, the Commuter Assistance Program also implements park and ride facilities to support ridesharing efforts. The last Caltrans park and ride facility in Riverside County was built in 1999. The Commission leases park and ride spaces from property owners to supplement the network of park and ride spaces in Riverside County. A continued focus for FY 2013/14 will be to monitor and optimize the number of spaces leased and coordinate with ridesharers and transit and rail partners to identify areas where the lease program can help support car/vanpool/buspool arrangements as well as facilitate transit connections. Department Goals Operate a cost-effective Commuter Assistance Program within Riverside County that results in a demonstrable reduction in single occupant vehicle trips, thus assisting with congestion mitigation and improving air quality. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Continue to offer short-term incentives for commuters to try a transportation mode other than driving alone. • Continue to provide a rewards program for long-term ridesharers to encourage their continued use of alternative modes of transportation. • Ensure the effectiveness of the Commuter Assistance Program through program analysis and recurring assessments of participation and retention of ridesharers. The Commission will continue to look for ways to pare program costs without impacting service delivery or participation. • Explore opportunities to further enhance the 511 mobile application by integrating incentive enrollment and/or tracking. • Extend the mode-shift/rideshare incentive and services to the Coachella Valley using awarded JARC funds. • Increase participation and use of on-line service by employer partners to reduce administrative costs. • Optimize the number of park and ride spaces leased and address park and ride gaps in the system. • Assess vanpool program funding opportunities. Ensure the coordination of ridesharing programs throughout the Inland Empire and the southern California region. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue to administer a "sister" Commuter Assistance Program in San Bernardino County on a contract basis, thus expanding the reach and effectiveness of commuter programs throughout the Inland Empire area. • Continue to provide leadership with regard to the ongoing operation, maintenance, and enhancement of both the regional ridematching database and network. • Fund and participate in regional rideshare marketing programs to enhance awareness of and encourage participation in commute modes that provide an alternative to driving alone. • Coordinate with regional partners with respect to the implementation of ridematching alternatives. • Investigate the modification of the regional vanpool agreement with the regional partners in order to provide for more service availability and a revision to the current cost sharing formula. • Implement the revised Guaranteed Ride Home model that is more suitable to the region's interests. Strategically broaden the reach of the program to encourage the use of alternative transportation modes amongst all travelers and continue to grow the core target base of employers and their employees. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Communications) Objectives: • Develop and implement a rideshare brand strategy and streamlined communications plan anchored by the 1E511 system. • Develop and support on-line resources and tools for employers to more effectively manage and market their organizations' rideshare programs. • Continue the dissemination of the report card program for both program participants and employer partners that translate individual or worksite rideshare participation into money saved, congestion reduced, and emissions reduced. • Publicize the participation of local employers in the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program through various media options. • Continue the operation of the Commuter Exchange vehicle to include 50 site visits for the FY 2013/14. • In partnership with the four -county transportation commissions and others, utilize the regional ridesharing database and website, www.ridematch.info. Commuter Assistance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Number of one-way single occupant vehicle trips reduced as a result of Rideshare Incentives 93,888 112,814 118,500 124,425 Number of Rideshare Plus Rewards Members 6,890 4,848 5,100 5,355 Number of incoming 1-866-RIDESHARE telephone calls 1,294 1,531 1,600 1,680 Number of services provided by Inland Empire Commuter Services to support employer trip reduction efforts at worksites: • Employer's requesting survey services 153 106 110 115 • RideGuides produced 29,564 15,628 16,400 17,220 Number of events participated in by the Commuter Exchange in total and as identified individually below: • Public events 2 10 5 5 • Employer work sites 3 3 5 5 • Elementary schools 45 39 40 40 Motorist Assistance Mission Statement: "To improve safety, reduce congestion, and enhance access to traveler information for motorists through the provision of a comprehensive motorist aid system." Chart 37 — Motorist Assistance t Expenditures Professional Costs j 11% i Salaries and Benefits 3% Projests and Operations 54% Motorist Assistance expenditures and uses are budgeted at $6,755,500 for FY 2013/14, or an increase of 10% compared to the prior year budget (Table 55) due to increased demand for FSP services supporting construction projects. Salaries and benefits reflect an increase of 6% due to market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $766,500 increased 7% due to enhancements to the 1E511 traveler information service. Support costs of $875,900 decreased $8,700, or 1%, primarily due to the FSP communication costs. Reimbursement from SANBAG for half of all 1E511 related expenditures is included in revenues. Budgeted expenditures for project operations include $3,300,000 in towing contract costs for the FSP program. Projects and operations costs have increased 18% due to increased towing for FSP construction services projects. Transfers out represent SAFE's matching funds of $916,400 to state funding for FSP services and a $374,500 allocation for administrative costs. Table 55 — Motorist Assistance Uses Detail FY111/12 FY12/13 FY12/13 FY11/14 Ibila. Peru Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 141203 $ 175933 $ 175900 $ 387,200 $ 11,300 6% Professional Casts Legzi Services 41803 31000 23,000 21000 (1,003) -3% Professional Services -General 74$800 637,50J 711503 737,500 KUM 7% Total Professional Costs 781600 717,500 735503 755500 43,000 Ta &wort Costs 515,400 884,60D 891200 Fv5903 ($7W) Ay. Projects and Cperations PrograrnCverations 2392100 3,0111COD 2,995,C00 1115,000 (25,000 21% Construction 61:1000 (0a0001 A % Total Projects and Operations 2392100 101g000 2934Ooo W5)003 565,030 183/0 TratsfersOut 1,034em 1,321,300 1,321,303 12919:0 (324201 -N TOTAL MttoiistAssistaice $ 4,942,9C0 $ 61033oo $ 401a900 $ 6755500 $ 5862([] lux, Motorist Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Administrative Assistant 0.04 0.03 Chief Financial Officer 0.01 0.01 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.42 0.42 Multimodal Services Director 0.23 0.26 Procurement Analyst 0.17 0.06 Procurement Manager 0.04 0.09 Staff Analyst 0.33 0.32 0.04 0.01 0.42 0.23 0.10 0.04 0.32 FTE 1.24 1.19 1.16 Department Budget Overview Department Description As a SAFE, the Commission is responsible for providing a motorist aid system for Riverside County. This system is comprised of three components: 1) call boxes, 2) FSP, and 3) the 1E511 traveler information system. The call box system allows motorists to call for assistance in the event of a mechanical breakdown, accident, or other emergency on the freeway. The FSP clears small debris on freeways and assists stranded motorists on the most congested Riverside County freeways by towing, changing flat tires, and temporarily taping cooling system hoses at no charge to the motorists. F513 service is also provided in construction zones through separate funding agreements with Caltrans to help mitigate congestion. The 1E511 system is a telephone and web -based service that delivers real-time traffic information, including incidents and travel times, bus and rail trip planning, and rideshare information. Key Assumptions • Annual maintenance costs are based on a flat -fee contract based on the number of call boxes. • Current percentage levels of vandalism, knockdowns, and miscellaneous repairs to call boxes will remain consistent with the past year. • The FSP will continue as long as state funding support is available. • Tow truck contractor costs for the nine existing FSP beats are based on Commission -approved contracts. • In partnership with SANBAG, the Commission will maintain and operate the 1E511 system in accordance with national 511 implementation standards. " T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l m a i n t a i n a n d o p e r a t e a n 1 E 5 1 1 s y s t e m t o b e f u n d e d 5 0 % b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d 5 0 % b y S A N B A G . T h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s s h a r e o f o p e r a t i n g c o s t s w i l l b e f u n d e d w i t h S A F E r e v e n u e s . " T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l e n h a n c e 1 E 5 1 1 w i t h t h e r o l l - o u t o f a m o r e p e r s o n a l i z e d t r a f f i c i n f o r m a t i o n s e r v i c e . A c c o m p l i s h m e n t s " G r e w t h e I E 5 1 1 . o r g w e b v i s i t s p e r m o n t h b y 4 0 % i n F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 . " E n h a n c e d t h e 1 E 5 1 1 s y s t e m w i t h a n e w i n t e r a c t i v e v o i c e r e c o g n i t i o n p l a t f o r m , m a n u a l f l o o d g a t i n g c a p a b i l i t i e s f o r m a j o r i n c i d e n t s , a n d i m p r o v e d f u n c t i o n a l i t y a n d g l o b a l p o s i t i o n i n g s y s t e m c a p a b i l i t i e s f o r t h e 1 E 5 1 1 m o b i l e a p p l i c a t i o n . " I n c o r p o r a t e d t h e n e w 1 - 1 0 t o s t a t e l i n e d e t e c t i o n a n d C M S s i g n s i n t o t h e t r a v e l e r i n f o r m a t i o n s y s t e m . " P e r f o r m e d a c o m p r e h e n s i v e a s s e s s m e n t t h a t i d e n t i f i e d a d d i t i o n a l c a l l b o x r e d u c t i o n o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o i m p r o v e p r o g r a m e f f i c i e n c i e s a n d m a i n t a i n a n e f f e c t i v e " s a f e t y - n e t " f o r s t r a n d e d m o t o r i s t s . " C o n t i n u e d t h e " c o s t r e c o v e r y " p r o g r a m f o r c a l l b o x k n o c k d o w n s i n a n e f f o r t t o c o l l e c t r e i m b u r s e m e n t s f r o m m o t o r i s t s i n v o l v e d i n a c c i d e n t s t h a t d a m a g e C o m m i s s i o n p r o p e r t y . " A c h i e v e d o n e o f t h e h i g h e s t b e n e f i t - t o - c o s t r a t i o s s t a t e w i d e f o r F S P i n t h e l a t e s t s t a t e w i d e F S P M a n a g e m e n t I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m R e p o r t . " P e r f o r m e d a n a s s e s s m e n t o f c u r r e n t F S P c o v e r a g e a n d i d e n t i f i e d o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o f u r t h e r o p t i m i z e t h e b e n e f i t : c o s t s r e a l i z e d a n d a s s e s s e d t h e f e a s i b i l i t y o f p r o g r a m e x p a n s i o n . " I m p l e m e n t e d a n e w d i g i t a l r a d i o s y s t e m f o r F S P t h a t a d d r e s s e s c o v e r a g e g a p s , s i g n i f i c a n t l y i m p r o v e s r e c e p t i o n , a n d c o m p l i e s w i t h t h e F e d e r a l C o m m u n i c a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ' s n a r r o w b a n d r a d i o c o n v e r s i o n r e g u l a t i o n . M a j o r I n i t i a t i v e s M a j o r M o t o r i s t A s s i s t a n c e i n i t i a t i v e s w i l l f o c u s o n s y s t e m e f f i c i e n c i e s a n d e v a l u a t i n g a n d / o r i m p l e m e n t i n g e n h a n c e d p r o g r a m s e r v i c e s o r c o v e r a g e . T h e c a l l b o x s y s t e m p r o g r a m h a s s e r v e d a s a " s a f e t y - n e t " f o r s t r a n d e d m o t o r i s t s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y s i n c e 1 9 9 1 . H o w e v e r , c a l l b o x u s a g e h a s d e c l i n e d o v e r t h e y e a r s w i t h t h e p r o l i f e r a t i o n o f m o b i l e p h o n e u s e . I n r e s p o n s e , c a l l b o x r e d u c t i o n s h a v e b e e n m a d e , a n d , u p o n a w a r d o f a n e w c a l l b o x m a i n t e n a n c e c o n t r a c t o r , a d d i t i o n a l r e d u c t i o n s w i l l b e m a d e b a s e d o n c a l l b o x r e m o v a l s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e c a l l b o x r e d u c t i o n p l a n n i n g a s s e s s m e n t . I n a d d i t i o n , s t a f f w i l l f o c u s o n m a i n t a i n i n g a h i g h b e n e f i t - t o - c o s t r a t i o a n d s e e k o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o m a x i m i z e f u n d i n g t o n o t o n l y i m p r o v e t h e l e v e l o f s e r v i c e b u t t o p o t e n t i a l l y e x p a n d F S P c o v e r a g e a s w e l l . T h e C o m m i s s i o n , a l o n g w i t h i t s p a r t n e r , S A N B A G , w i l l c o n t i n u e t o o p e r a t e a n d m a i n t a i n t h e 1 E 5 1 1 s y s t e m . T h i s s y s t e m i n c l u d e s a w e b s i t e i n t e r f a c e a n d a n i n t e r a c t i v e v o i c e r e s p o n s e ( I V R ) t e l e p h o n e s y s t e m t h a t s e r v e s R i v e r s i d e a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o c o u n t y r e s i d e n t s a n d c o m m u t e r s . W h i l e s e v e r a l e n h a n c e m e n t s h a v e b e e n m a d e t o t h e s y s t e m s i n c e i t s l a u n c h , n e w e n h a n c e m e n t s w i l l f o c u s o n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f s e r v i n g m o r e p e r s o n a l i z e d t r a f f i c i n f o r m a t i o n s e r v i c e s s p e c i f i c t o a c o m m u t e r ' s l o c a t i o n , r o u t e , a n d t i m e o f t r a v e l . D e p a r t m e n t G o a l s P r o v i d e e f f i c i e n t d e l i v e r y o f a c o m p r e h e n s i v e m o t o r i s t a i d s y s t e m ( C a l l B o x , F S P , 1 E 5 1 1 ) a n d a n o u t s t a n d i n g l e v e l o f s e r v i c e t o t h e t r a v e l i n g p u b l i c . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y , S y s t e m E f f i c i e n c i e s , F i n a n c i a l & A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) O b j e c t i v e s : " W o r k i n c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h C H P a n d C a ! t r a n s t o i m p l e m e n t c a l l b o x r e d u c t i o n s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e p l a n n i n g a s s e s s m e n t . " A l o n g w i t h S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y S A F E , c o n t i n u e t o m o n i t o r t h e o p e r a t i o n o f t h e c a l l a n s w e r i n g c e n t e r c o n t r a c t o r . " R e s e a r c h n e w t e c h n o l o g i e s t o s t r e a m l i n e F S P p r o c e s s e s a n d d e v e l o p n e w t o o l s t o a u t o m a t e t h e p r o d u c t i o n o f r e p o r t s t h a t t r a c k t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f F S P t o w o p e r a t o r s . " C o n t i n u e t o e v a l u a t e o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o p r o v i d e m o r e e f f i c i e n t F S P c o v e r a g e t h r o u g h c h a n g e s i n s e r v i c e d a y s , s e r v i c e h o u r s , o r n u m b e r o f v e h i c l e s a s s i g n e d t o e a c h b e a t ; p e r f o r m b u d g e t a s s e s s m e n t s t o i d e n t i f y p o t e n t i a l s e r v i c e e x p a n s i o n ( i . e . , h o l i d a y s e r v i c e , w e e k e n d s e r v i c e o n s e l e c t b e a t s ) o p p o r t u n i t i e s t h a t c a n b e s u p p o r t e d . " R e v i e w p r o p o s e d c o n s t r u c t i o n p r o j e c t s w i t h C a l t r a n s a n d l o c a l c i t i e s a n d c o o r d i n a t e t h e u s e o f t e m p o r a r y t o w s e r v i c e t o m i t i g a t e c o n g e s t i o n . E n h a n c e a c c e s s t o r e a l - t i m e t r a v e l e r i n f o r m a t i o n . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : S y s t e m E f f i c i e n c i e s , C o m m u n i c a t i o n s ) O b j e c t i v e s : " D e v e l o p a c c e s s t o , o r d e l i v e r y o f , m o r e p e r s o n a l i z e d t r a f f i c i n f o r m a t i o n s e r v i c e s s p e c i f i c t o a c o m m u t e r ' s l o c a t i o n , r o u t e , a n d t i m e o f t r a v e l . " G r o w t h e n u m b e r o f u s e r s w i t h m o r e p e r s o n a l i z e d o f f e r i n g s , s e r v i c e s , a n d c o s t - e f f e c t i v e m a r k e t i n g e f f o r t s . " C o n t i n u e t o r e f i n e a n d e n h a n c e 1 E 5 1 1 w e b c o n t e n t , a p p l i c a t i o n s , a n d o u t r e a c h . " C o n t i n u e t o l e v e r a g e e x i s t i n g r e s o u r c e s , s u c h a s t r a f f i c d a t a , p r o v i d e d b y C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t 8 , e x i s t i n g I V R s o f t w a r e , a n d G o o g l e T r a n s i t t o m i n i m i z e c o s t s . " C o o r d i n a t e w i t h C a l t r a n s o n e x p a n d i n g t r a f f i c d e t e c t i o n a n d f e e d i n g t h a t t r a f f i c d a t a i n t o t h e 1 E 5 1 1 s y s t e m . " U t i l i z e t h e o p p o r t u n i t y a t t h e n e w C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t 8 T r a f f i c M a n a g e m e n t C e n t e r t o e n h a n c e c o o r d i n a t i o n b e t w e e n C H P a n d C a l t r a n s o n t r a v e l e r i n f o r m a t i o n . M o t o r i s t A s s i s t a n c e P e r f o r m a n c e / W o r k l o a d I n d i c a t o r s F Y 1 1 / 1 2 E s t i m a t e d F Y 1 1 / 1 2 A c t u a l F Y 1 2 / 1 3 E s t i m a t e d F Y 1 3 / 1 4 P r o j e c t e d N u m b e r o f c a l l b o x e s 6 1 1 6 0 8 6 0 3 5 5 0 N u m b e r o f c a l l b o x c a l l s 5 , 0 9 4 5 , 0 4 3 4 , 7 9 1 4 , 5 5 1 N u m b e r o f v e h i c l e a s s i s t s 4 7 , 1 2 3 4 2 , 7 4 8 4 4 , 8 8 5 4 7 , 1 2 9 N u m b e r o f 1 E 5 1 1 p h o n e c a l l s 5 0 3 , 7 0 7 3 6 2 , 9 5 7 3 4 4 , 8 0 9 3 2 7 , 5 6 9 N u m b e r o f 1 E 5 1 1 w e b v i s i t s 2 5 1 , 6 0 5 3 4 1 , 7 1 6 3 5 8 , 8 0 2 3 7 6 , 7 4 2 iiii1111 Mon t Riverside County Transportation Commission ttiit u t lb 1 [N]qt Capital Project Development and Delivery Mission Statement: "To keep the Commission's contract with the voters of Riverside County by accelerating the planning, programming, and implementation of projects and programs in the Measure A Transportation Improvement Plan, as enhanced by the Toll Program, to the extent that funds are available. To ensure that capital projects are environmentally acceptable, expertly designed, and implemented in a cost effective manner. To acquire and manage required right of way in the most economical, efficient, and timely manner." Chart 38 — Capital Project Development and Delivery Salaries and Benefits 096_ Debt Service 9% Expenditures Professional Costs 1% The budgeted expenditures and transfers out total $1,502,513,600 to cover all of the Commission's major capital projects (Table 56). Personnel costs represent less than 1% of the budgeted uses. Salaries and benefits reflect an increase of 7% due to FTE allocations; market equity adjustments resulting from a biennial classification and compensation study; 3% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 3% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $19,260,400 are primarily related to general legal costs, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the toll program, debt management services, and BNSF services related to a rail capital project. Support costs of $907,300 consist primarily of services needed to maintain the Commission's real properties in a condition that complies with all local codes and regulations governing property maintenance. General project costs include $12,197,600 related to program management provided by Bechtel Infrastructure (Bechtel), SCRRA, and permits for highway and rail capital projects. Significant projects included in engineering expenditures of $20,355,000, are the SR-91, 1-15, and 1-215 corridor improvements; 91/71 interchange improvement project; Mid County Parkway; 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector; SR-91 HOV lanes; various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment; and commuter rail CCTV operations center. Construction expenditures of $240,968,400, are primarily related to the 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment) SR-91 corridor improvement; SR-74 curve widening; I-15/Los Alamos Road bridge replacement; I-215/Blaine to Martin Luther King widening; 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector; 74/215 interchange; SR-91/La Sierra interchange; SR-91/HOV lanes Mary Street to 7th Street; various Western County Measure A and TUMF regional arterial projects, including the SR-79 realignment; and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. Design -build costs of $217,750,000 pertain to the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Approximately 14% of the projects and operations costs represent right of way expenditures of $164,707,800 on significant projects including the SR-91 corridor improvement project; SR-91 HOV lanes; 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment); 91/71 interchange improvements; SR-74 curve widening; Mid County Parkway; 74/215 interchange; 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes connector; various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects; and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. Funding will also be provided for MSHCP land mitigation acquisitions. Local turnback payments to jurisdictions and the County for local streets and roads repair, maintenance, and construction amount to $43,825,900, net of an allocation of $659,100 to the 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial special revenue fund related to the ineligibility of the city of Beaumont for its local streets and roads allocation. Disbursements to CVAG for the 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial program comprise substantially all of the regional arterial expenditures. Special studies of $25,000 are related to the SJBL. Operating and capital disbursements of $2,000,000 are related to Metrolink station rehabilitation costs. Rail capital equipment purchases for the station security project represent 71% of the capital outlay expenditures. Interest payments on outstanding commercial paper and the 2009 Bonds, 2010 Bonds, 2013 Bonds, and the Toll Bonds are approximately $41,112,300. Principal payments of $7,100,000 are related to the 2009 sales tax revenue bonds, and $80,000,000 to retire commercial paper notes. Cost of issuance expenditures of $7,500,000 are related to the issuance of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and 2013 Toll Bonds. Significant transfers out consist of the following: • $342,227,600 in commercial paper, sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds to fund 2009 Measure A Western County highway projects such as the SR-91 and 1-15 corridor improvements, 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment) project, and the 91/71 interchange project; • $15,319,500 from the TUMF CETAP reserves for two city of Temecula regional arterial projects along 1-15 and the 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment) project; • $11,000,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County highway funds to the Debt Service fund; • $10,000,000 from 1989 Measure A excess debt service reserves for a rail project; • $693,800 from TUMF for administrative allocations to the General fund; • $659,100 from 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads to the 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial program for the city of Beaumont's local streets and roads allocation; • $17,000,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial reserves to TUMF regional arterial projects for the cities of Corona, Moreno Valley, and San Jacinto, and the County; • $33,600 for construction FSP service related to the 1-215 corridor improvement (central segment) project; • $1,000,000 from 1989 Measure A Western County rail fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund to return funds advanced but not spent for the Perris Transit Center; • $80,000,000 in 2013 Sales Tax Bonds proceeds to retire commercial paper notes; • $90,362,000 in 2013 Sales Tax Bonds proceeds to the Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund to pay interest during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project; and • $47,661,000 in 2013 Toll Bonds proceeds to to the Toll Bonds debt service fund to pay interest during the construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement project. Table 56 - Capital Project Development and Delivery Uses Detail Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Legal Services Audit Services Financial Advisory Professional Services- General Total Professional Costs Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way and Land Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials Special Studies Operating and Capital Disbursements Total Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Transfers Out TOTAL Capital Project Development and Delivery Capital Project Development and Position Administrative Assistant Capital Projects Manager Chief Financial Officer Community Relations Manager Deputy Executive Director Executive Director Facilities Administrator Goods Movement Manager Government Relations Manager Planning & Programming Manager Procurement Analyst Procurement Manager Project Delivery Director Project Development Director Right of Way Manager Senior Staff Analyst Staff Analyst Toll Program Director Toll Project Manager FTE FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Actual Revised Budget $ 2,268,400 $ 3,113,100 $ 3,242,200 38,000 437,500 1,339,800 5,057,500 300,700 5,416,600 21,366,500 27,451,200 16,285,700 53,728,100 40,127,900 8,962,700 67,000 173,405,700 142,200 61,507,400 97,810,100 $ 340,492,000 4,507,900 86,500 910,000 2,188,100 7,692,500 597,100 11,852,300 27,892,500 125,934,100 29,050,000 112,246,800 42,129,000 16,455,400 40,000 50 000 365,850,100 225,000 143,413,000 302,013,41M $ 822,904,200 Delivery Staffing Summary FY 11/12 0.31 2.65 0.21 0.92 0.08 0.33 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.18 0.56 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Projected Budget 2,934,200 $ 3,339,800 $ 4,573,900 60,000 600,500 2,087,300 7,321,700 302,900 7,431,800 16, 540, 900 61,628,000 29,050,000 64,716,400 42,129,000 20,500,400 70,000 242,066,500 78,300 22,990,600 100,727,100 $ 376,421,300 4,534,600 44,000 2,392,400 12,289,400 19,260,400 907,300 12,197,600 20,355,000 240,968,400 217,750,000 164,707,800 43,825,900 25,157,500 25,000 2.000.000 726,987,200 350,000 135,712,300 615,956.600 $1,502,513,600 FY 12/13 0.35 3.60 0.24 0.85 0.07 0.36 0.00 0.25 0.15 0.05 0.54 0.75 0.99 0.94 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 2.00 Dollar Change 226,700 26,700 (42,500) 1,482,400 10,101,300 11,567,900 310,200 345,300 (7,537,500) 115,034,300 188,700,000 52,461,000 1,696,900 8,702,100 (15,000) 1,750,000 361,137,100 125,000 (7,700,700) 313,943,200 $ 679,609,400 12.20 Percent Change 7% FY 13/14 1% - 49% 163% 462% 150% 52% 3% - 27% 91% 650% 47% 4% 53% - 38% 700% 99% 56% -5% 104% 83% 0.48 4.65 0.31 0.90 0.10 0.35 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.37 0.49 0.95 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 2.00 15.17 16.20 Department Budget Overview Department Description The primary responsibility of Capital Projects is the development and delivery of major highway and rail capital projects where the Commission is identified as the lead agency. The delivery of a capital project can include tasks such as feasibility studies, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, final design, right of way acquisition, construction, and construction management. Funding is also provided through Capital Projects for local jurisdiction highway and regional arterial projects based on funding agreements with the Commission. Approximately 79% of the Commission's FY 2013/14 budgeted expenditures originates in this department managed by the Toll Program, Project Delivery, and Project Development Directors responsible for the capital program. Capital Projects accelerates delivery of the Measure A, toll, state, and federally funded highway, regional arterial, and rail capital improvement projects throughout the County. Highway improvements currently in progress include the addition of mixed flow, carpool, and tolled express lanes; widening and realignment projects; and interchange improvements as well as a new CETAP corridor. Regional arterial capital improvements include funding for Western County TUMF regional arterial projects. Commuter rail capital improvements include the expansion of commuter rail service in Riverside County. This department also provides the necessary coordination between the Commission and Caltrans for the development of scope, cost, and project delivery schedules for Measure A projects that are funded by the STIP and Proposition 1B CMIA. The 2009 Measure A program includes funding to the incorporated cities and the County for local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction. The budgeted amount is set by formula established in the Measure A TIP. To be eligible to receive these Measure A funds, each city in the Western County and Coachella Valley areas and the County must participate in the TUMF program, which is administered by WRCOG in Western County and by CVAG in Coachella Valley. Additionally, for Western County jurisdictions, they must also participate in the MSHCP. Annually all cities and the County are required to submit a five-year CIP and meet a MOE requirement. Each jurisdiction's respective allocation is based on population (Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling unit (Coachella Valley) and the amount of sales tax generated. The city of La Quinta had not participated in the Coachella Valley TUMF Program prior to February 2013 when the city adopted the TUMF ordinance and entered into an agreement with CVAG to reimburse CVAG for the shortfall of prior TUMF. Accordingly, the city of La Quinta will begin to receive 50% of its allocation until the shortfall is repaid and CVAG the remaining 50%. The city of Beaumont was determined to be in noncompliance with the Western County TUMF program. As a result, Beaumont's Measure A allocation is transferred to the Commission's 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial program. Given the support required to oversee and participate in the project development work, costs for Commission staff and related support have been included in this department budget. The projects identified in the FY 2013/14 budget funded by Measure A, TUMF, state, or federal funds as well as future toll revenues require the continued support of the Bechtel program management team which includes program managers, project engineers, construction engineers, inspectors, contracts administration, and support staff. Right of Way Acquisition and Support Services The primary goal of the Right of Way Management Division is to deliver right of way in the most cost-effective manner and within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. Commission staff required to supervise and manage right of way services and related support for individual projects are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. The Commission authorized the development of a Right of Way Acquisition Program in 2006. To implement the Commission's directive, staff procured the services of on -call right of way consultant services in the fields of right of way engineering and surveying, environmental assessment, appraisal and appraisal review, acquisition and relocation, feasibility studies and cost estimates, property management, and utility relocation. These consultants are managed and supervised by the Right of Way Management Division. Property Management The Commission strives to manage its real property with the objective of maximizing existing and future public transportation benefits, safety, and income by means of professional property management policies and procedures. This includes issuing licenses and rights of entry for authorized third -party uses, as well as investigating and resolving issues regarding uses that are not authorized by the Commission. On certain occasions, the Commission may also grant easements. General maintenance activities and security measures are also part of the property management scope of work on all Commission -owned properties. The demolition and clearance of structures and other improvements on acquired property, excluding commuter rail stations, is included in the property management function. Additionally, the Commission must manage real property acquired for a project until it is required for construction. Since 1990, the Commission has acquired property assets in the course of rail and highway project implementation. To date, the rail properties number over 225 parcels. The Commission acquired approximately 500 parcels for the SR-74 widening project (Segments 1 and 2), and most of these parcels, which were related to Segment 1, have been transferred to Caltrans. In addition approximately 125 properties have been acquired for the SR-91 HOV lanes, Mid County Parkway, SR-79 realignment, SR-74 curve widening, Perris Valley Line, 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment), and SR-60 HOV lanes/I-215 to Redlands Boulevard projects. Property acquisition for the SR-91 corridor improvement project began in 2010 with 48 properties acquired to date. These properties were acquired in fee, and will be transferred primarily to Caltrans upon completion of the projects. Upon project completion, all remaining portions of properties within every project are reassessed and deemed surplus when it has been determined that the continued retention of the property no longer supports the Commission's policy goals and objectives. Long -Term Strategic Planning Several years ago, the strategic plan for the 1989 Measure A highway program was updated and provided the guidance for completion of the 1989 Measure A highway projects. A significant effort was completed in December 2006 to develop an implementation plan strategy for the 2009 Measure A state highway program, with a focus on the first 10 years of the program through 2019. An objective -based assessment of the Western County portion of the 2009 Measure A TIP was completed along with the prioritization of the program of projects. Four highway corridors, 1-215, 1-15, 1-10, and SR-91, were selected as the priority focus for the first 10 years of the 2009 Measure A program, and long-term development work was approved for large scale projects such as the development of the Mid County Parkway, realignment of SR-79, and the bi-county widening of 1-215 to San Bernardino County. Project development activities for these projects have been ongoing since an update and reprioritization was completed in most of January 2010. Since 2010, a scope reevaluation was completed on the 1-15 corridor improvement project and the Commission adopted a new scope of work which entails tolled express lanes on the northern 14 miles of 1-15 in Riverside County. The 1-10 truck climbing lanes project was deferred several years and has been replaced with added safety improvements on SR-60. For the strategic projects, preliminary engineering and environmental clearance will be completed for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment; right of way acquisition for Mid County Parkway will be considered for extraordinary acquisitions on a pay-as-you-go basis, while right of way acquisitions for SR-79 realignment will be suspended due to lack of available funding. Project costs and anticipated funding for these projects have been updated annually, and a status update has been included in each of the annual Commission workshops since 2011. Updated capital project implementation strategic plans are expected in 2019 and 2029, as required by the 2009 Measure A. CVAG has developed a strategic plan for Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial projects based upon a transportation project prioritization study that is updated periodically. The Perris Valley Line is the most significant rail capital project, and it was included in the 1989 and 2009 Measure A programs. Other rail capital projects are developed in coordination with SCRRA as well as the implementation of the Perris Valley Line. Four new Western County transportation corridors were identified through CETAP and are eligible for 2009 Measure A Western County new corridor and TUMF CETAP funding. Given the size and anticipated cost of these new corridors, they are moving forward on varied schedules with the work on the internal corridors, the Mid County Parkway and 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment) to French Valley interchange, being the most advanced. Western County TUMF regional arterial projects were approved in 2004 based on a call for projects, which is discussed in the Planning and Programming Department in section 6.2 of this document. Additionally, the Commission will participate in the improvement of a wildlife corridor crossing under SR-91, B Canyon, in collaboration with Caltrans, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. National Forest, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Parks and Recreation. The actual construction of this enhancement will be done subsequent to the construction on the SR-91 corridor improvement project. These strategic planning activities play a significant part of the Commission's annual budget process, in particular the capital budget. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue its emphasis on the closeout of the 1989 Measure A program. • The Western Riverside County Delivery Plan serves as the basis for defining the 2009 Measure A project selection and prioritization. • Western County TUMF regional arterial projects are based on the list approved by the Commission in 2004. • Agreements for the advancement of 2009 Measure A funds have been obtained from CVAG and cities participating in the debt programs. The annual principal and interest payments for these loans will be deducted by the Commission from each agency's respective disbursements based on the terms of the loan agreements. • Highway project costs are based on engineers' estimates and scope agreements with Caltrans. • Construction projects are competitively bid to minimize costs. • All projects will be built to required standards. • All highway projects, with the exception of tolled express lane facilities, are transferred upon completion to Caltrans; operation of these facilities is the responsibility of Caltrans. Tolled express lane facilities, when completed, will be operated and maintained by the Commission for 50 years by agreement between Caltrans and the Commission. • The Commission will develop strategies to implement alternative financing structures including public toll roads. • 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial projects have been selected and programmed when revenues are at a level that can sustain reasonable cash flow to fund the construction projects selected for this program. A call for projects that combines available 2009 Measure A regional arterial funds with federal revenues will be conducted. • Development of the SR-79 realignment and Mid County Parkway strategic projects through preliminary engineering and environmental clearance will continue. Accomplishments • Continued implementation of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Completed construction phase for 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment) widening from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road. • Continued construction for the 60/215 East Junction and SR-91 HOV lanes projects. • Completed final design, right of way acquisition, and utility relocations and initiated procurement for construction management teams for the SR-74 curve realignment project and the I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening project. " C o m p l e t e d t h e f i n a l d e s i g n , r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n s , a n d u t i l i t y r e l o c a t i o n s a n d b e g a n c o n s t r u c t i o n f o r t h e 1 - 2 1 5 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t ( c e n t r a l s e g m e n t ) w i d e n i n g f r o m S c o t t R o a d t o N u e v o R o a d . " C o m p l e t e d t h e d e s i g n a n d r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n a n d u t i l i t y r e l o c a t i o n s a n d b e g a n c o n s t r u c t i o n f o r t h e 1 - 2 1 5 b i - c o u n t y H O V p r o j e c t . " B e g a n t h e p r o j e c t r e p o r t a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l p h a s e f o r t h e 1 - 2 1 5 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s o u t h c o n n e c t o r s a n d t h e S R - 6 0 t r u c k c l i m b i n g l a n e . " C o n t i n u e d t o a d v a n c e t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t i n n u m e r o u s a r e a s : " R e c e i v e d a p p r o v a l f o r a n a p p r o x i m a t e $ 4 5 1 m i l l i o n f e d e r a l l o a n u n d e r t h e U . S . D O T ' s T I F I A p r o g r a m . " R e a c h e d a g r e e m e n t w i t h O C T A a n d C o f i r o u t e U S A , L L C t o o p e r a t e a n d m a i n t a i n t h e 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s . " C o m p l e t e d t h e p r o j e c t r e p o r t a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t . " C o m p l e t e d t h e p r o c u r e m e n t a n d a w a r d e d a c o n t r a c t f o r d e s i g n - b u i l d s e r v i c e s . " C o n t i n u e d t o a c q u i r e t h e n e c e s s a r y p r o p e r t y a l o n g t h e c o r r i d o r t o c o n s t r u c t t h e p r o j e c t . " C o n t i n u e d f i n a l d e s i g n f o r t h e 9 1 / 7 1 i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t . " R e c e i v e d C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l f o r a t o l l e d e x p r e s s l a n e w o r k s c o p e f o r t h e 1 - 1 5 c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t . " C o m p l e t e d t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e f o r t h e 7 4 / 2 1 5 i n t e r c h a n g e p r o j e c t . " C o m p l e t e d t h e u p d a t e d t e c h n i c a l s t u d i e s a n d e n g i n e e r i n g m o d i f i c a t i o n s t o a d d r e s s t h e r e d u c e d p r o j e c t l i m i t s o f t h e p r o p o s e d M i d C o u n t y P a r k w a y p r o j e c t a n d r e l e a s e d a r e c i r c u l a t e d e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t f o r p u b l i c r e v i e w a n d c o m m e n t . " R e l e a s e d t h e d r a f t e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t f o r p u b l i c r e v i e w a n d c o m m e n t f o r t h e S R - 7 9 r e a l i g n m e n t p r o j e c t . " C o n t i n u e d s u c c e s s f u l n e g o t i a t i o n s w i t h F T A r e l a t e d t o t h e S m a l l S t a r t s f u n d i n g a u t h o r i z a t i o n f o r t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e . " C o m p l e t e d e n g i n e e r i n g f o r t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e p r o j e c t . " S u p p o r t e d p u b l i c o u t r e a c h a c t i v i t i e s b y p r o v i d i n g g r a p h i c s f r o m t h e r i g h t o f w a y p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t d a t a b a s e f o r C o m m i s s i o n p r e s e n t a t i o n s t o f a c i l i t a t e p u b l i c u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f p r o j e c t i s s u e s . " C o n t i n u e d t o d e c l a r e p r o p e r t y n o l o n g e r n e e d e d f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p u r p o s e s a s s u r p l u s a n d s o l d s e v e r a l s u r p l u s p r o p e r t i e s . " C o m p l e t e d r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n f o r t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e p r o j e c t . M a j o r I n i t i a t i v e s F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 w i l l m a r k t h e f i f t h y e a r a s t h e C o m m i s s i o n c l o s e s o u t t h e 1 9 8 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m s a n d c o n t i n u e s p r o j e c t a c t i v i t i e s r e l a t e d t o t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m s , o f w h i c h t h e h i g h w a y , r a i l , r e g i o n a l a r t e r i a l , a n d l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s p r o g r a m s r e p r e s e n t t h e m a j o r i t y o f t h e f u n d i n g a l l o c a t i o n s . W h i l e m o s t o f t h e 1 9 8 9 M e a s u r e A h i g h w a y p r o j e c t s h a v e b e e n c o m p l e t e d , a f e w p r o j e c t s w i l l c o n t i n u e s u c h a s t h e S R - 9 1 H O V l a n e s f r o m A d a m s S t r e e t t o 6 0 / 9 1 / 2 1 5 i n t e r c h a n g e , S R - 7 4 c u r v e w i d e n i n g , a n d 6 0 / 2 1 5 E a s t J u n c t i o n H O V l a n e s c o n n e c t o r . T h e 1 - 2 1 5 b i - c o u n t y H O V g a p c l o s u r e p r o j e c t a n d P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e r a i l p r o j e c t s w i l l c o n t i n u e , a s b o t h a r e a l s o i n c l u d e d i n t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A . V a r i o u s s t a g e s o f p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t w o r k f o r p r o j e c t s i n c l u d e d i n t h e W e s t e r n C o u n t y H i g h w a y D e l i v e r y P l a n w i l l c o n t i n u e i n F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 . D e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n s o f t h e c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s , i n c l u d i n g l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f u n d i n g , t h a t a r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 b u d g e t f o l l o w t h e P e r f o r m a n c e / W o r k l o a d I n d i c a t o r s . D e p a r t m e n t G o a l s B u i l d u p o n a n d s t r e n g t h e n t h e p a r t n e r s h i p w i t h C a l t r a n s t o w a r d t i m e l y d e l i v e r y o f i d e n t i f i e d M e a s u r e A , C M I A , t o l l p r o g r a m , a n d S T I P p r o j e c t s . ( P o l i c y G o a l s : M o b i l i t y , E n v i r o n m e n t a l S t e w a r d s h i p , E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t ) O b j e c t i v e s : " D e v e l o p a g r e e m e n t s w i t h C a l t r a n s a n d F H W A , a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d , t o f i n a l i z e p r o j e c t s c o p i n g a n d c o s t i s s u e s f o r t h e S T I P , f e d e r a l d e m o n s t r a t i o n , t o l l , a n d M e a s u r e A f u n d e d h i g h w a y p r o j e c t s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . " M e e t t h e p r o j e c t m i l e s t o n e s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e C M I A a g r e e m e n t s b e t w e e n C o m m i s s i o n , C a l t r a n s , a n d t h e C T C . To the extent permitted by law, pursue reasonable involvement of local DBE and SBE firms in contract work. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objective: • Maintain and monitor goal for a minimum DBE participation in all federally funded contracts. Provide effective communication of project progress to the Commission board members, city councils, the County Board of Supervisors, Caltrans, CTC, FTA and FHWA. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Develop a strategy with Caltrans District 8 that would allow the Commission to advance specific projects identified in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan to take advantage of any unexpected state or federal funding which may become available through increased state or federal budget authorizations, federal stimulus, or potential loan programs to advance construction. • Conduct quarterly meetings with FTA and report on progress of Perris Valley Line project. Work with Caltrans and other agencies toward completion of preliminary engineering and environmental clearance of all projects. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objectives: • Work with Caltrans, the County, and the cities in Riverside County to complete preliminary design and environmental clearance for Measure A projects that could be eligible to receive additional or early funding from various sources that could become available if a project is sufficiently developed. • Release for public review and comment the NEPA and CEQA environmental documents for the 1-215 corridor improvement project southbound connector. • Prepare the final environmental document for the SR-79 realignment project. • Prepare and receive approval on the final environmental document for the modified Mid County Parkway project. • Initiate the project approval and environmental document of the SR-60 truck climbing lane project. • Continue the project approval and environmental document for the 1-15 corridor improvement project. Construct the highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Economic Development, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Complete closeout of the 74/215 interchange project. • Commence and complete construction of the SR-74 curve widening project and the I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening project. • Complete closeout of the 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment), the first project in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan to reach construction. • Continue construction on the 1-215 corridor improvement project (central segment) between Scott Road and Nuevo Road. • Continue construction of the 60/215 East Junction HOV lanes project and the SR-91 HOV lanes project. • Continue construction on the 1-215 bi-county HOV project. • Continue design and construction of the SR-91 corridor improvement design -build project. In coordination with the Rail Program Manager, construct capital improvements at existing commuter rail stations as identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Environmental Stewardship, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objective: • Continue construction for the Perris Valley Line. Acquire right of way for rail and highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Acquire right of way for the following projects: SR-91 corridor improvement project, SR-74 curve realignment project, 1-215 corridor improvement project (central segment), and Perris Valley Line. • Protect and maintain properties acquired for future projects. Identify alternative financing strategies in order to fully fund projects identified in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objective: • Continue the assessment and evaluation of available strategies. Location of FY 2013/14 Major Capital Projects within Riverside County INSERT MAP HERE 1) SR-74 Construction for the curve widening on SR-74 from Calvert Avenue to California Avenue. 2) 74/215 Construction close out of the interchange. 3) SR-79 Realignment between Gilman Springs Road and Domenigoni Parkway including project study report, project report, and environmental document. 4) SR-91 (A) Construction of HOV lanes from Adams Street to the 60/91/215 interchange. (B) Final design for the 91/71 interchange improvements. (C) Design -build toll and mixed flow lanes from the Orange County line to Pierce Street. 5) Mid County Parkway 6) Perris Valley Line 7) Local Streets and Roads 8) 60/215 9) 1-215 Bi-County HOV Gap Closure Project Preliminary engineering, project report, and environmental documentation for the project. Construction for the Perris Valley Line (Riverside -Moreno Valley - Perris) along the SJBL. Allocation of Measure A revenues to each city and the County to improve, maintain, and repair high priority local streets and roads. Construction of the East Junction HOV lane connectors. Construction and utility relocations for HOV lanes on the 1-215 from the 60/91/215 interchange to Orange Show Road in San Bernardino County. 10) 1-215 (A) Closeout of the south segment from 1-15 to Scott Road. (B) Construction of the central segment from Scott Road to Nuevo Road. (C) Construction of the I-215/Blaine to Martin Luther King Boulevard widening. 12) SR-60 Truck Climbing Lane Preparation of engineering and environmental document for the addition of tolled express lanes from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. Continue project approval and environmental document of the truck climbing lane project. Capital Project Development & Delivery Performance/Workload Indicators FY 11/12 Estimated FY 11/12 Actual FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Projected Preliminary engineering (project reports and environmental documentation) contracts awarded 2 1 1 0 Plans, specifications, and estimate contracts awarded 2 1 1 1 Number of projects with active right of way acquisition 7 4 6 6 Construction awards 2 2 1 3 Highway and Rail project close-outs 2 0 0 3 License agreements managed 60 60 75 75 Appraisal and appraisal reviews completed 79 90 450 300 Capital Projects Summary The following is a summary of the capital projects included in the FY 2013/14 budget. Costs are generally categorized by preliminary engineering, final design, right of way, construction, and design -build phases in addition to other project -related costs such as salaries and benefits, Bechtel project management, and legal fees. Western County Highway and Regional Arterial Projects SR-74/1-15 to 7`h Street (P003001) Complete right of way acquisition closeout for Segment II related to the realignment and widening of four -lane roadway between Wasson Canyon Road in the city of Lake Elsinore and 7th Street in the city of Perris. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 30,000 Right of way support services $ 22,900 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 74/215 Interchange (P003015) Continue plant establishment until 2015. Preliminary engineering began in 2006 and was completed in 2009. Final design was completed in 2009. Construction began in mid-2010 and was completed in 2013. The total project cost is estimated at $30 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 750,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 30,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 176,800 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds, TUMF zone contributions, ARRA funds, and a federal earmark. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-74 Curve Widening (P003009) Continue with right of way acquisition. Construction of the project should begin 2013. The total estimated project cost is $4.2 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 3,410,000 Construction/construction management $ 310,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 215,600 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-79 Realignment (P003003 & P005127) Perform realignment environmental and preliminary engineering services from Gilman Springs Road to Domenigoni Parkway. The project is expected to be completed with the environmental phase in 2014. The total estimated project cost is $1.2 billion. Initiation of subsequent phases will be dependent upon the availability of funding. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 4,000,000 Preliminary engineering $ 317,500 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact None; costs have been funded using TUMF regional arterial, federal earmarks, and SAFETEA-LU federal funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-79 Widening/Thompson to Domenigoni (P005114) Provide funding and support to complete construction for the widening of SR-79 to four lanes. Right of way acquisition was completed in 2012. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 3,000,000 Construction Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A regional arterial funds with the County of Riverside as lead agency. The Measure A funding commitment for this project was $7.1 million. N/A; state highway and regional arterial operations are the responsibility of Caltrans and the local jurisdiction, respectively. SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (P003026 & P003028) Continue property acquisition and start final design and construction for the tolled express and mixed flow lanes project from the Orange County line to Pierce Street, including tolled express lanes connectivity to 1-15 and improvements to the 15/91 interchange. Project development activities began in September 2007 and lanes are expected to be open to traffic in 2017. The SR-91 corridor improvement project cost is estimated at $1.3 billion. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 100,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 135,310,000 $ 217,750,000 $ 6,822,400 Preliminary engineering Construction/support services Right of way acquisition/support services Design -build Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds, including sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, a federal TIFIA loan, STIP, and SLPP funds. Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilities are the responsibility of the Commission, while all other state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Current estimates of annual operating and maintenance costs are $11,200,000. Such costs will be paid from the collection of toll revenues beginning in 2017. 91/71 Interchange Improvements Project (P003021) Continue final design for interchange improvements to the 91/71 interchange. Final design began in March 2012. The total estimated project cost is $123 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 4,600,000 $ 3,335,000 $ 554,300 Final design Right of way acquisition/support services Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Costs for final design and right of way acquisition will be primarily funded using Congressionally -designated federal funding remaining from previous area projects. The balance of funding will come from 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-91 HOV Lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 Interchange (P003005) Begin construction and complete utility relocations. Preliminary engineering began in 2001. Construction of the project should be completed in the summer of 2015. The estimated total project cost is $273 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact $ 32,000 $ 150,000 $ 11,444,000 $ 672,700 Final design Construction Right of way acquisition/support services Other project -related costs Final design costs will be funded using Letter of No Prejudice funds received and CMAQ with 1989 Measure A highway funds for local match. Right of way costs will be funded using STIP-RIP, Traffic Congestion Relief Program, CMAQ, and 1989 Measure A highway funds. CMAQ and CMIA funds generated by Proposition 1B will be used for construction activities. Caltrans is the lead agency. Operating Budget Impact N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-91/La Sierra Avenue Interchange (P003014) Provide funding and support to complete construction to widen and fully improve La Sierra Avenue from SR-91 to El Sobrante Road. The landscaping and plant establishment portion of the project is expected to be completed in mid-2013. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 33,000 Construction Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds with the city of Riverside as lead agency. The Measure A funding commitment for this project was $27.2 million. N/A; state highway and regional arterial operations are the responsibility of Caltrans and the local jurisdiction, respectively. 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project (P003027) Resume preliminary engineering and environmental work originally started in April 2008, as the Commission approved a scope of work in early 2013 that will add two tolled express lanes in each direction from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. The estimated total project cost is $415 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 7,000,000 Preliminary engineering $ 2,110,000 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Project development costs and a portion of construction will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. It is anticipated that toll revenue bonds will be issued and the Commission will secure a federal TIFIA loan to complete the project financing plan in the future. Operating Budget Impact Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilities are the responsibility of the Commission, while all other federal and state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Preliminary estimates of annual operating and maintenance costs are $15 million. Such costs will be paid from the collection of toll revenues. I-15/Los Alamos Road Bridge Replacement (P003036) Provide funding and support to begin construction in 2013. Construction of the project is expected to be completed by 2014. The total project cost is estimated at $3.8 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 900,000 Construction Measure A Budget Impact 2009 Measure A highway funds will be used for construction. The Measure Operating Budget Impact A funding commitment for this project was approximately $2.9 million. The city of Murrieta is the lead agency for construction. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 60/215 East Junction HOV Lane Connectors (P003017) Complete construction of the project in 2014. Preliminary engineering began in 2006. Final design and right of way acquisition were completed in 2010. The total project cost is estimated at $42 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,055,000 Construction/support services $ 274,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 82,600 Other project -related costs STP and CMAQ, with STIP-RIP and STIP-IIP for local match funds, will be used for construction. Caltrans is the lead agency for construction. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvements (South Widening Segment)/1-15 to Scott Road (P003022) Conclude project closeout as construction was completed in 2012. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and was completed in 2008. Final design began in 2008 and was completed in 2010. The total project cost is estimated at $33 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 1,700,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 148,800 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using STIP-RIP funds and 2009 Measure A highway funds; CMIA funds generated by Proposition 1B bonds will be used for construction activities. Operating Budget Impact N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvements (Central Segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road (P003023) Continue to add one mixed flow lane in each direction. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and was completed in 2011. Final design began in 2011 and was completed in December 2012; construction began in 2013. Construction of the project is expected to be completed by 2016. The total project cost is estimated at $120 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 45,500,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 730,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 1,240,900 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using CMIA, STIP-RIP, and 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvement Southbound Connector (P003031) Continue preliminary engineering, which began in 2010, to widen southbound connector to 1-15 with construction expected to be completed by 2019. The total project cost is estimated at $8.5 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 800,000 Preliminary engineering $ 150,000 Final design $ 99,300 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. I-215/Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard Widening (P003035) Commence construction to widen the 1-215 from Blaine Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard. Construction is expected to be completed in 2013. Total project cost is $2.2 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 2,057,300 Construction/construction management $ 153,900 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds and STP. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Mid County Parkway (P002302 & P005123) Perform activities related to the development of a recirculated project report and environmental document for a new corridor from 1-215 to SR-79. The environmental phase is anticipated to be completed in FY 2013/14. Construction of this new facility will be completed over many years as funding becomes available and is estimated to cost $1.3-1.6 billion. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 2,300,000 Preliminary engineering $ 250,000 Final design $ 6,182,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 623,500 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded with TUMF CETAP funds and 2009 Measure A new corridor funds. N/A; responsibility for highway operations has not been determined. Various Western County Highway Projects (P623999 & P312402) Provide funding and support for the engineering, construction, and right of way activities related to various Western County highway projects. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 100,000 Environmental engineering $ 20,000 Right of way support services Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Various Western County Measure A and TUMF Regional Arterial Projects (P005201, P005102, P005103, P005104, P005105, P005106, P005107, P005108, P005113, P005115, P005116, P005118, P005119, P005120, P005128, P005132, P665102 & P725000) Provide Western County Measure A and TUMF funding and support for the engineering, right of way, and construction activities related to various Western County Measure A and TUMF regional arterial projects approved by the Commission in September 2004 following a call for projects. Total project costs approved for TUMF regional arterial projects approximate $79 million. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact $ 823,000 Engineering and design $ 40,784,100 Construction $ 3,545,800 Right of way acquisition $ 326,000 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using TUMF regional arterial and 2009 Measure A Operating Budget Impact regional arterial funds with various local jurisdictions as lead agency for their respective projects. N/A; regional arterial operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdictions. MSHCP Land Acquisition in Western County (PO02800) Provide funding and support for the acquisition of land as mitigation for the cumulative and indirect impacts associated with construction of future highway projects as required by 2009 Measure A. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Rail Projects $ 3,000,000 Land acquisition Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; land mitigation operations are the responsibility of RCA. North Main Corona Station Parking Structure (PO03808) Complete construction close-out of a parking structure at the North Main Corona station. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 20,000 Construction management $ 133,200 Other project -related costs 1989 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations of this parking structure will be the responsibility of the Commission. Annual operating costs are estimated at $300,000 to be funded with LTF. Perris Multimodal Facility (P003816) Complete construction close-out of the Perris Transit Center. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 50,000 Construction management $ 10,000 Right of way support services $ 220,700 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using Proposition 1B PTMISEA and a contribution from the 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Assistance fund. Operations of this facility will be the responsibilities of the Commission and RTA, as defined in a cooperative agreement. Annual operating costs are estimated at $76,000. Perris Valley Line and Other Rail Projects (PO03800, PO03823, PO03824, PO03825, PO03827, PO03828, PO03829, PO03830, PO03831, PO03832, PO03833, and PO03834) Continue final design for extension of commuter rail services to Perris. Project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from FTA to move into project development. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the SJBL branch line at Highgrove. Expected completion date of the Perris Valley Line is July 2015 for a total project cost of $248.3 million. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 133,197,000 Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 427,000 $ 13,824,100 Construction/construction management/support services Right of way acquisition/support services Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using FTA, CMAQ, STP, and 1989 Measure A rail funds as well as proceeds from sales of surplus properties. Subsequent year costs will also include STIP funding. Rail station operations related to this project, which will be the responsibility of the Commission upon completion of the project, will be funded with LTF and property management fees. Rail service and capital operations will be the responsibility of Metrolink and will be funded by the Commission with LTF and STA based on an allocation determined by Metrolink. Annual station operations approximate $300,000 per station, or $1,200,000 annually in the aggregate for four proposed stations. Station Rehabilitation (PO04011) Provide funding and support for station rehabilitation activities at various rail stations. FY 2013/14 Cost $ 2,260,000 Construction/construction management Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using Proposition 1B funds. Operating Budget Impact Operations of all commuter rail stations are the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using LTF. CCTV Operations Center (PO04018) Provide funding and support for a CCTV operations center at the Riverside downtown station. Final design and construction are expected to begin in August 2013. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 200,000 Final Design $ 1,150,000 Construction/construction management $ 50,000 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using Proposition 1B funds and 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations will be the responsibility of the Commission. Annual operating costs are estimated at $20,000 to be funded with 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Riverside Station Pedestrian Improvements (PO04019) Provide funding and support for the Riverside downtown station pedestrian improvement project. Construction is expected to begin October 2013. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,152,000 Construction/construction management Costs will be funded using state TE grant funds and 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations of the Riverside downtown station are the responsibility of the Commission. Annual operating costs are estimated at $450,000 to be funded with LTF. Various Western County Rail Projects (P332402 and 244001) Provide Measure A funding and support for right of way activities related to various rail projects. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Local Streets and Roads $ 5,000 Final design $ 60,000 Right of way support services $ 1,136,900 Other project -related costs 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A rail funds. Annually monitor the MOE requirements to ensure local agencies are expending funds according to the 2009 Measure A ordinance. Review local agency five-year CIPs to ensure Measure A funds are expended on eligible local street and road projects. Western County Area Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Western County. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Coachella Valley $ 470,000 Banning 0 Beaumont 132,000 Calimesa 148,000 Canyon Lake 3,279,000 Corona 882,000 Eastvale 1,422,000 Hemet 1,487,000 Jurupa Valley 993,000 Lake Elsinore 1,261,000 Menifee 3,136,000 Moreno Valley 1,836,000 Murrieta 533,000 Norco 1,194,000 Perris 5,918,000 Riverside 684,000 San Jacinto 2,429,000 Temecula 487,000 Wildomar 4,344,000 Riverside County 659,000 Commission 31,294,000 Total Western County (659,100) Less: Allocation to Western County regional arterials (Beaumont allocation) $ 30,634,900 Total Western County, net All costs will be distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Coachella Valley. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,274,000 Cathedral City 578,000 Coachella 437,000 Desert Hot Springs 231,000 Indian Wells 1,515,000 Indio 693,500 La Quinta 2,478,000 Palm Desert 1,854,000 Palm Springs 814,000 Rancho Mirage 1,605,000 Riverside County 693,500 CVAG (50% of La Quinta allocation) $ 12,173,000 Total Coachella Valley All costs will be distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Palo Verde Valley Area Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Palo Verde Valley. FY 2013/14 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 810,000 Blythe 208,000 Riverside County Total Palo Verde Valley $ 1,018,000 All costs will be distributed in accordance with 200'3 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Riverside County Transportation Commission rhulb PrA Community Profile Riverside County is the fourth largest county in California, stretching westward nearly 200 miles from the Colorado River and comprising more than 7200 square miles that include 28 incorporated cities. Riverside County can trace its beginning back to 1893 when voters approved the formation of a new county. The area was carved from parts of San Bernardino and San Diego counties. In its 120 years of existence, the County's economy has diversified and prospered. Originally, Riverside County was a very agricultural area, known for a wide variety of crops grown on its fertile soils. The County remains a strong agricultural area, but it is increasingly becoming a leader in manufacturing, transportation, construction, and tourism. Demographics The success of the area has brought dramatic population growth to Riverside County (Chart 39). Since the 1980's, the County has been one of the fastest growing counties in the State. Chart 39 — Population — Last Ten Years 2,500,000 --- ---- 2,000,000 1,son oao 1,000,000 500,000 0 1 o3 tioo° Source: California Department of Finance 1 The available and affordable housing in Riverside County has attracted many people to the County (Chart 40); however, housing is gradually recovering from a slowdown due to the effect of the subprime mortgages, ensuing credit crisis, and recession. Chart 40 — Home Price Advantage Home Value Advantage Riverside County and Southern California Markets (February, 2013) 1 ■ Median Home Values ❑Riverside County Advantage $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Riverside Source: Data Quick News Los Angeles San Diego Ventura County Orange #257;000 During the growth period, jobs also increased as many firms relocated to the area and moved away from older communities; however, the recent economic slowdown had caused the County's unemployment rate to rise from its near all-time lows (Chart 41). The unemployment rate has been decreasing. Chart 41— Unemployment Rate (%) — Last Ten Years 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% e e e Source: California Employment Development Department The overall economic outlook for Riverside County is expected to continue to improve in 2014 based on various economic forecasts. The area is preparing for its future as well in supporting better education. The County is home to a number of colleges and universities including University of California, Riverside. Statistical Information Retail Sales As a result of demographic changes and growth, retail sales in the County increased through 2007 (Chart 42 and Table 57); however, the effect of the recent recession on retail sales was noted in sales tax receipts beginning in 2008. FY 2012/13 retail sales have shown continued improvements from these previous years. Chart 42 — Retail Sales (%) - $25 Billion — 2011 Data Other Retail Sales 6.67% Source: State Board of Equalization Apparel Stores 5.88% 5.09% Automotive 24.61% Household & Electronics 3.57% Building Materials 5.08% Table 57 -Riverside County Taxable Sales by Business Type (in 000's) - Last Five Years 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Apparel Stores $ 1,505,821 $ 1,391,174 $ 1,293,271 $ 1,121,543 $ 1,171,013 General Merchandise 3,051,709 2,947,905 2,855,733 3,389,936 3,593,134 Food Stores 1,304,731 1,267,758 1,251,220 1,254,366 1,352,609 Eating & Drinking 2,473,339 2,317,486 2,266,853 2,340,554 2,388,039 Household & Electronics 914,888 883,109 858,098 816,379 843,945 Building Materials 1,303,073 1,232,145 1,237,518 1,435,337 1,961,911 Automotive 6,311,272 5,306,408 4,749,994 6,126,512 7,137,075 Other Retail Sales 1,711,453 1,480,601 1,442,875 3,250,335 2,794,790 Total all other services & outlets 7,065,212 6,326.196 6.272,315 6,268,633 7,781,093 $ 25,641,498 $ 23,152,782 S 22,227,877 $ 26,003,595 $ 29.023,609 Source: State Board of Equalization The 2011 taxable sales generation by jurisdiction in the County, including ranking compared to 2002, is presented in Table 58. Table 58 -Taxable Sales Generation by Jurisdiction in Riverside County for 20111 Taxable Sales (inoon) %of Total 2011 Rank 2002 Rank City of Riverside $ 4,019,127 15.7% 2 2 City of Corona 2,715,071 10.6% 3 3 City of Temecula 2,364,795 9.2% 4 4 City of Palm Desert 1,384,208 5.4% 5 5 City of Moreno Valley 1,172,223 4.6% 6 6 City of Murrieta 965,758 3.8% 7 11 City of Palm Springs 880,426 3.4% 8 10 City of Hemet 799,835 3.1% 9 7 City of La Quinta 680,382 2.8% 10 15 City of Indio 650,281 2.6% 11 9 City of Lake Elsinore 634,553 2.5% 12 13 City of Cathedral City 606,771 2.4% 13 8 City of Perris 584,313 2.3% 14 14 City of Menifee 421,545 1.6% 15 N/A City of Norco 384,972 1.5% 16 12 City of Rancho Mirage 374,093 1.5% 17 16 City of Eastvale 340,171 1.3% 18 N/A City of Beaumont 317,192 1.2% 19 20 City of Coachella 289,223 1.1% 20 19 City of San Jacinto 193,050 0.8% 21 21 City of Jurupa Valley 184,926 0.7% 22 N/A City of Banning 157,071 0.6% 23 17 City of Blythe 145,422 0.5% 24 18 City ofWildomar 116,696 0.4% 25 N/A City of Desert Hot Springs 113,904 0.4% 26 22 City of Indian Wells 84,987 0.3% 27 24 City of Calimesa 57,965 0.2% 28 23 City of Canyon Lake 12,660 0.0% 29 25 Incorporated 20,651,620 80.5% Unincorporated county area 4,989,878 19.5% 1 Countywide $ 25,641,498 100.0% California Source: California State Board of Equalization 1 Year represents most recent data available $ 520,568,055 Measure A Sales Taxes Measure A is a one-half of one cent transaction and use tax for transportation improvements in Riverside County. The County had an 8.75% sales tax rate including the Measure A rate through June 2011, 7.75% from July 2011 through December 2012, and 8.00% thereafter (Table 59). Table 59 - Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates - Last Five Years Fiscal Year 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Measure A Direct Rate County of Riverside 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 8.00% 7.75% 8.75% 8.75% 8.75% Source: Commission Finance Department and California State Board of Equalization Since the recent economic slowdown, changes have occurred in the economic categories in which the Measure A sales tax was generated (Table 60). General retail and transportation represented the two highest economic categories and more than 56% of sales taxes generated. Transportation has improved in recent years due to high fuel prices and new auto purchases. Construction, which was comprised of the building materials wholesale and building materials retail segments, is a significant contributor and has shown slight improvement from previous years of declines due to the effects of the recession and housing slowdown. Table 60 - Sales Tax by Economic Category Economic Category 2009/4 2010/4 2011/4 2012/4 % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total General Retail 30.9% 30.9% 29.9% 29.0% Transportation 22.8% 25.0% 27.1% 27.0% Food Products 17.8% 17.0% 16.4% 16.4% Business to Business 15.2% 14.5% 14.1% 14.7% Construction 11.1% 10.5% 10.5% 10.9% Miscellaneous 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Source: MuniServices, LLC Each economic category consists of several economic segments, which provide additional information regarding economic activity in the County. In 2009 the top six economic segments consisted of miscellaneous retail, auto sales -new, department stores, service stations, restaurants, and building materials -wholesale. Over the next three calendar years, auto sales -new and building materials wholesale have improved, while service stations, department stores, and restaurants have comprised the top three economic segments. The top six economic segments in 2012 with comparisons to previous years are presented in Table 61. Table 61- Sales Tax by Economic Segment Top Six Economic Segments (Category) 2009/4 2010/4 2011/4 2012/4 % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total Service Stations (Transportation) Department Stores (General Retail) Auto Sales - New (Transportation) Restaurants (Food Products) Building Materials - Wholesale (Construction) Miscellaneous Retail (Miscellaneous) Source: MuniServices, LLC 10.0% 12.9% 7.9% 11.0% 5.8% 6.5% 11.6% 12.6% 8.4% 10.7% 5.5% 6.7% 12.9% 11.8% 9.1% 10.3% 6.1% 6.6% 11.9% 11.2% 10.0% 10.0% 6.5% 6.3% Commission Facts Programs and Services Measure A: The Commission administers Measure A, the local half -cent sales tax for new transportation projects in the County. Under Measure A, funding is used to improve highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, local streets and roads, transit and specialized transportation services including commuter assistance, economic development, new corridors, and Commission administration. Measure A expires in 2039. Transportation Development Act: The TDA is comprised of two elements: Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance funding. The Commission administers the LTF one -quarter of one cent of the state sales tax on behalf of the County. STA is generated from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel and is allocated by the State to the Commission on the basis of population and as a percentage of transit fare revenues. TDA funding is allocated primarily to bus and rail transit operators for transit operating and capital needs. Additionally, LTF funding is available for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, planning, and administration and allocated to the Commission and local jurisdictions in the County. Highways: The Commission assists with the planning and funding for highway improvements. Major current projects include: 60/215 East junction HOV lanes connector, SR-74 curve widening, 91/71 connectors, SR-91 corridor improvement project, SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to the 60/91/215 interchange, 1-15 corridor improvement project, 1-215 corridor mobility improvement projects, and Mid County Parkway. State highway maintenance is generally the responsibility of Ca!trans. Local Streets and Roads: The Commission administers funding to local jurisdictions to improve streets, intersections, signal coordination, and pavement. Local streets and roads maintenance is the responsibility of the local jurisdictions. Commuter Rail: The Commission funds and oversees Metrolink rail services within the County. The Commission's three Metrolink lines are the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 lines. The Commission owns and maintains five Metrolink stations and one transit center located at: ➢ Riverside Downtown Station, 4066 Vine Street, Riverside ➢ La Sierra Station, 10901 Indiana Avenue, Riverside ➢ Pedley Station, 6001 Pedley Road, Riverside ➢ North Main Corona Station, 250 E. Blaine Street, Corona ➢ West Corona Station, 155 S. Auto Center Drive, Corona ➢ Perris Multimodal Transit Center, 121 S. C Street, Perris Motorist Assistance: The Commission provides emergency call boxes and the 1E511 traveler information system through the SAFE and offers emergency towing services through the FSP. Commuter Assistance: The Commission provides a variety of rideshare services both to employers and commuters. Through voluntary participation, commuters and employers receive a direct benefit from their sales tax dollars, and the entire region benefits from reduced traffic congestion and improved air quality. Specialized Transit: The Commission maintains a strong commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its Specialized Transit Program, the Commission has provided millions of dollars to public and nonprofit transit operators to assist in the provisions of special transit services to improve the mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities. OMR aim minim--__ Riverside County Transportation Cession ttt9tn 1,3 ci Q piAllt(t Glossary of Acronyms ADA — Americans with Disabilities Act ARRA* — American Recovery and Reinvestment Act AT — Active Transportation BABs — Build America Bonds Bank of America — Bank of America, N.A. Bank of Tokyo — The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch Bechtel — Bechtel Infrastructure BNSF — Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Board — Board of Commissioners for the Riverside County Transportation Commission CABS — Capitalized Appreciation Bonds CAFR — Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CaIPERS — California Public Employees Retirement System Caltrans — California Department of Transportation CAGTC — Coalition for America's Gateways and Trade Corridors CEQA — California Environmental Quality Act CETAP — Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process CHP — California Highway Patrol CHSRA — California High Speed Rail Authority CIBs — Current Interest Bonds CIP — Capital Improvement Plan CMA — Congestion Management Agency CMAQ* — Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality CM IA* — Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (Proposition 1B funding category) CMP — Congestion Management Program CMS — Congestion Management System Commission — Riverside County Transportation Commission Coordinated Plan — Coordinated Public Transit —Human Services Transportation Plan County — County of Riverside CTC — California Transportation Commission CTSA — Consolidated Transportation Service Agency CVAG — Coachella Valley Association of Governments Deutsche Bank — Deutsche Bank AG DBE — Disadvantaged Business Enterprise DMV — Department of Motor Vehicles ERP — Enterprise Resource Planning ETC — Employer Transportation Coordinators FHWA* — Federal Highway Administration FITCH — Fitch Ratings FSP — Freeway Service Patrol FTA* — Federal Transit Administration FTE — Full-time Equivalent FTIP — Federal Transportation Improvement Program FY — Fiscal Year GASB — Governmental Accounting Standards Board GFOA — Government Finance Officers Association GPS — Global Positioning System HOV — High Occupancy Vehicle (Carpool Lane) I — Interstate 1E511 — Inland Empire 511 IEOC — Inland Empire —Orange County Metrolink Service IIP* — Interregional Improvement Program Inland Empire — Region covering Riverside and San Bernardino counties IVR — Interactive Voice Response JARC — Jobs Access Reverse Commute (FTA Section 5316) JPMorgan — JP Morgan Chase Bank LIBOR — London Interbank Offer Rate LOS — Level of Service LOSSAN — Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo, a rail corridor LTF* — Local Transportation Fund Measure K — Increase of sales tax revenue bonds debt limit to $975 million approved by voters in November 2010 Metrolink — Operating Name for SCRRA (see SCRRA) Moody's — Moody's Investors Service MOE — Maintenance of Effort MOU — Memorandum of Understanding MSHCP — Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan MSRC — Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (AB 2766) NEPA — National Environmental Policy Act OA — Obligation Authority OCTA — Orange County Transportation Authority Perris Valley Line — Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project PM — Particulate Matter Ports — Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach PPM — Planning, Programming, and Monitoring PTMISEA* — Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (Proposition 1B transit funding category) RCA — Regional Conservation Authority RCTC — Riverside County Transportation Commission RFA — Request for Authorization RIP* — Regional Improvement Program RTA — Riverside Transit Agency RTP — Regional Transportation Plan RTPA — Regional Transportation Planning Agency RZEDBs — Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds S&P — Standard & Poor's Rating Service SAFE — Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies SAFETEA-LU* — Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Sales Tax — Reference including transaction and use tax such as Measure A SAN BAG — San Bernardino Associated Governments SB375 — Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg) California's Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act SB821 — Senate Bill 821 LTF Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds SBE — Small Business Enterprise SBOE — State Board of Equalization SBPAs — Standby Bond Purchase Agreements SCAG — Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SCRRA — Southern California Regional Rail Authority SCS — Sustainable Communities Strategy Series A Tax -Exempt— Series of tax-exempt bonds issued under 2010 Bonds Series B Taxable — Series of taxable Build America Bonds issued under 2010 Bonds SHCC — Self -Help Counties Coalition SJBL — San Jacinto Branch Line SLPP* — State Local Partnership Program SR — State Route SRTP — Short Range Transit Plan SSAB — Salton Sea Air Basin STA* — State Transit Assistance State — State of California STIP* — State Transportation Improvement Program STP* — Surface Transportation Program SunLine — SunLine Transit Agency TAC — Technical Advisory Committee TAP — Transportation Alternatives Program TCIF* — Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (Proposition 1B funding category) TDA* — Transportation Development Act TE* — Transportation Enhancements TIFIA* — Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act TIGER — Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery TIP — Transportation Improvement Plan TUMF* — Transportation/Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (Western County/Coachella Valley) Union Bank — Union Bank, N.A. U.S. DOT — United States Department of Transportation Western County — Western area of Riverside County WRCOG — Western Riverside Council of Governments 1989 Measure A* — Original 1/2 cent transportation sales tax measure approved by voters in November 1988 2009 Measure A* — Extension of sales tax measure approved by voters in November 2002 which became effective upon expiration of original sales tax measure on July 1, 2009 2009 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series A, B and C issued in October 2009 2010 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series A Tax-exempt and Series B Taxable issued in November 2010 2013 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds anticipated to be issued in July 2013 2013 Toll Bonds — Toll Revenue Bonds anticipated to be issued in July 2013 * Additional information provided in Funding Definitions. Funding Definitions Federal Funding Sources Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act The TIFIA program provides credit assistance for qualified projects of regional and national significance that are critical improvements to the nation's surface transportation system. It is designed to fill market gaps and leverage substantial private and non-federal co -investment by providing supplemental and subordinate capital. TIFIA credit assistance is often available on more advantageous terms than in the financial market making it possible to obtain financing, in the form of a secured loan, loan guarantee, and/or standby line of credit, for needed projects when it might not otherwise be possible. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Commonly referred to as the Stimulus or The Recovery Act, ARRA is an economic stimulus package "intended to create jobs and promote investment and consumer spending" during the recent recession. It includes domestic spending in infrastructure with investment transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure providing long-term economic benefits. ARRA also created the Build America Bond program, which authorized state and local governments to issue in 2009 and 2010 such bonds as taxable bonds to finance capital expenditures for which would otherwise be financed with tax-exempt governmental bonds. State and local governments issuing BABs receive a direct federal subsidy payment for a portion of their borrowing costs on BABs equal to 35 to 45 percent of the total coupon interest paid to investors. The BAB program was intended to assist state and local governments finance capital projects at lower borrowing costs and to stimulate the economy and create jobs. Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 formula funds made available to urbanized areas for operating subsidies, capital projects and planning. Operating match is up to 50% of the net operating cost; capital and planning match is 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5309 discretionary funds generally provided to urbanized areas for funding new start rail projects, major bus fleet replacement, and transit facility construction. Matching ratios range from 50/50 to 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5310 funds made available to states for providing capital support to private non-profit and, in certain circumstances, public transit operators. This is a state administered discretionary program providing funds on an 88.53% federal and 11.47% local basis. Section 5311 funds provided to support rural transit operating subsidies and capital projects. Operating match is up to 50% of the net operating cost; capital match is 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5316 funds provided for the development and maintenance of jobs access projects to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from work during non -peak hours as well as supply reverse commute options for workers in suburban areas. Section 5317 funds made available for new public transportation services and alternatives for people with disabilities beyond the requirements of the ADA of 1990. Federal Highway Administration In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) was approved by Congress to replace the former Federal Aid Urban/Federal Aid System funding programs. ISTEA was established as a six -year funding program and was reauthorized for another six years in 1997. This new transportation act was renamed as the Transportation Equity Act of the Twenty-first Century (TEA21) and was extended through August 10, 2005 when the President signed into law SAFETEA-LU. With guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation totaling $244.1 billion, SAFETEA-LU represents the largest surface transportation investment in our nation's history. Under these programs the following fund sources are allocated to each county, and the Commission further allocates these funds based on federal provisions. Surface Transportation Program Funds allocated by the Commission and administered by Caltrans that provide funding for local street and road improvements. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds allocated by the Commission for transportation related air quality improvement projects in air quality non -attainment areas. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. Safety projects can qualify for 100% of CMAQ funding. Transportation Enhancements The amount of funds made available under this program is 10% of the state apportionment of STP funds. Projects are qualified and prioritized by the Commission and submitted to the California Transportation Commission for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program. The basic definition of a transportation enhancement project is an improvement that is over and above the base transportation project. Project categories are pedestrian and bicycle facilities, scenic or historic highways, scenic beautification, historic preservation, rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities, preservation of abandoned railway corridors, control/removal of outdoor advertising, archaeological planning and research, and mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. State Local Funding Sources State Transportation Improvement Program The STIP consists of RIP and IIP funds. The RIP and IIP programs are mainly supported by Proposition 42 funding. The RIP component represents 75% of STIP funds available for capacity projects. Regional Transportation Planning Agencies are responsible for selection of projects proposed for RIP funds. The IIP component represents the remaining 25% of STIP funds available for capacity projects and Caltrans is responsible for the selection of IIP-funded projects. The Commission and Caltrans District 8 work closely in coordinating projects for these fund sources. Proposition 1B Program In November 2006, the voters in California approved Proposition 1B, which will fund various transportation programs from bonds issued by the state of California. Programs to be funded include CMIA, transit capital (PTMISEA), transit security (CTSGP-CTAF), STIP supplement, goods movement (TCIF), SLPP funds, and cities and counties. Transportation Development Act The TDA is comprised of two elements: LTF and STA funds. LTF funds are derived from 1/4 of one cent of the state sales tax and are returned to source. There are three areas of apportionment within Riverside County comprised of Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley (Blythe). The Commission administers the LTF on behalf of the County of Riverside. Funds are provided for program administration, Southern California Association of Governments regional planning, local transportation planning, and transit services in Western County and the Coachella Valley. In the Palo Verde Valley, funds support transit services and local street and road improvements. Additionally, under SB 821, 2% of LTF funds are made available for bicycle and pedestrian projects. STA funds are generated from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel and are allocated by the state to the Commission based on population and as a percentage of transit fare revenue. The Commission has generally used these funds to support capital purchases and improvements as these funds have been subject to state budgetary actions. Local Funding Sources Measure A Measure A is a half -cent local retail transaction and use tax that was initially approved by the voters in November 1988 for 20 years (Ordinance 88-1) and extended in November 2002 for an additional 30 years (Ordinance 02-001), through June 2039, to help fund key transportation improvements in Riverside County. It provides funds to improve highways, regional arterials, and local streets and roads; to develop new transportation corridors; to expand commuter rail, public transit, specialized transportation services, and commuter programs; develop a program of economic incentives to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs; and support bond financing. These types of improvements are needed to maintain and improve the quality of life in the County, reduce current congestion, and provide adequate transportation facilities to accommodate reasonable growth. Since existing state and federal sources provide only a limited amount of funding for a limited number of projects, Measure A will cover the shortfall for key projects with a funding source that is under local control. It will use the revenue generated in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley to meet the unique transportation needs of each of those areas. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee The TUMF program was adopted by all local jurisdictions in the Western County area of Riverside County in July 2003. Under this program, which is administered by the WRCOG, fees are assessed on new residential and commercial development in Western County to ensure that new development pays its fair share toward providing the needed infrastructure improvements on the regional system of highways and arterials. In accordance with the extension of Measure A in 2002 and an amended Memorandum of Understanding with WRCOG, the Commission shall receive 48.7% of the TUMF revenues to fund equally the regional arterial system and the development of new corridors. Program Terms The following explanations of terms are presented to aid in understanding the various program terms used and discussed in the narrative. Bicycle and Pedestrian LTF provides revenues for the construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and related right-of-way costs. Bond Financing In order to accomplish the construction of the highway and rail projects and implementation of the local streets and roads and other programs identified in the Measure A TIP as soon as possible, some level of borrowing will be required. A portion of the revenues generated in the Western County will be made available for this purpose. Commuter Assistance The purpose of this program is to provide short-term incentives to encourage single occupant vehicle drivers to use alternate modes of transportation including carpools, vanpools, bus pools, public bus, commuter rail, walking, and bicycling. Commuter Rail Measure A provides operating and capital revenue for commuter rail service to Orange and Los Angeles counties. LTF provides revenue for commuter rail operations in Riverside County. These trains operate on existing railroad tracks parallel to major freeways. Commuter rail service provides a safe and reliable transit alternative to driving alone during the peak period. Plans to expand commuter rail service in Western Riverside County from Riverside to Perris via Moreno Valley are currently underway. Economic Development Measure A will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve existing interchanges, construct new interchanges, provide public transit linkages or stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system in Western County. These incentives are intended to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate within the Western County area. Highways Measure A provides revenues to widen existing highways, expand interchanges, and improve remote freeways. These improvements are needed to control traffic congestion in Western County and improve access and safety in Coachella Valley. Costs of these improvements will be covered by funds from state and federal sources. Measure A revenue will be used to supplement —not replace —these other sources and to accelerate work on projects deferred for lack of funding. Local Streets and Roads Measure A provides revenues to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. The County and local cities are required to supplement those expenditures with other previously dedicated revenue sources to maintain road improvements at a level equal to or greater than the base year amount. LTF provides revenue for local street and road improvements in the Palo Verde Valley. Metrolink The Commission's commuter rail program is part of the regional network operated by SCRRA operating under the name of Metrolink, a five -county joint powers agency composed of the transportation commission's of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, and Ventura. The purpose of this agency is to manage the operation and maintenance of commuter rail in the five -county metropolitan area. Motorist Assistance The Motorist Assistance program has three elements. The FSP is a special team of tow trucks that travel on selected Riverside County freeways during peak commute hours to assist drivers when their cars break down. Another element is the call box system, which installation and operation is made possible with revenue provided by the public. Call boxes are being provided by the Commission, which serves as the County's SAFE. The third element is the Inland Empire 511 traveler information system. One dollar per year from every motor vehicle registration pays for the call boxes and their operation and maintenance, 1E511 operations, and matching funds for FSP. New Corridors Four new transportation corridors were identified through the CETAP. Measure A and TUMF funds will be used for environmental clearance, right of way, and construction of these new corridors. Public Transit The Commission is the agency responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming and coordinating the operation of all public transportation service within the County. The Commission allocates and disburses TDA as well as Measure A funds to the transit operators for operating and capital purposes. Regional Arterials Measure A funds generated within the Western County and Coachella Valley areas are used for major regional road projects. The system is to be implemented with a mix of funding required from new development under a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee to be paid by developers from new development and from Measure A funds returned to the Western County and Coachella Valley areas. The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee schedule shall be established in order to generate at least the equivalent of Measure A funding toward the regional arterial system. Specialized Transit Measure A provides public transit revenues to improve transportation services for seniors, persons with disabilities and commuters. For seniors and persons with disabilities, it provides dial -a -ride cab service at night for emergency purposes, guarantees half-price bus fares, and assists centers with their transit programs. For commuters, it improves express bus service and expands ridesharing programs. In the Coachella Valley, revenues also are available for bus replacement and local bus service. Transportation Improvement Plan This plan also acts as the County's expenditure plan and was prepared by the Commission for the proposed 1/2% local retail transaction and use tax for transportation purposes to be collected. This was proposed by the Commission as a means to fill the funding shortfall to implement needed highway, regional arterial, economic development incentives, and new corridors; local street and road programs; commuter rail projects and operations; public bus transit and specialized transportation improvements; commuter assistance programs; and bond financing. General Terms The following explanations of terms are presented to aid in understanding the narrative discussions and illustrations included in this budget document and the terminology generally used in governmental accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and budgeting. Accountability The state of being obliged to explain one's actions, to justify what one does. Accountability requires a government to answer to its citizenry to justify the raising of public resources and the purposes for which they are used. Accounting System The methods and records established to identify, assemble, analyze, classify, record, and report a government's transactions and to maintain accountability for the related assets and liabilities. Accrual Basis of Accounting The accounting of the financial effects of transactions, events, and interfund activities when they occur, regardless of when cash is received or paid. Audit A systematic collection of the sufficient, competent evidential matter needed to attest to the fairness of management's assertions in the financial statements or to evaluate whether management has efficiently and effectively carried out its responsibilities. The auditor obtains this evidential matter through inspection, observation, inquiries, and confirmations with third parties. Balanced Budget The identification of revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances to fund operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses on an annual basis. Basis of Accounting A term used to refer to when the effects of transactions or events are recognized for financial reporting purposes. For example, the timing of recognition can be when the transaction or event occurs (accrual basis) or when cash is received or paid (cash basis). Bond A written promise to pay a specified sum of money (face or principal amount) at a specified date or dates in the future (maturity date), together with periodic interest at a specified rate. Bonds are primarily used to finance capital projects. Budget A plan of financial activity for a specified period indicating all planned revenues and expenditures for the budget period. Annual budgets are usually required by law and are essential to sound financial management. The Commission prepares an annual budget that is applicable to a single fiscal year. Budgetary Control The control or management of a government in accordance with an approved budget to keep expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. Budget Document The instrument used by the budget -making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the appropriating governing body. Capital Outlay Expenditures resulting in the acquisition of or addition to the government's capital assets or assets to be transferred to Caltrans, such as highway projects. Capital Project A long-term strategic project requiring relatively large sums of revenues, accumulated reserves, and/or financing to acquire, develop, construct, improve, and/or maintain a capital asset such as land, buildings, and infrastructure. Capital Projects Fund A governmental fund type created to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital projects. The Commission has two capital projects funds for Commercial Paper and Sales Tax Bonds to account for debt proceeds from 2009 Measure A commercial paper notes and sales tax revenue bonds related to highway, commuter rail, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects. Commercial Paper An unsecured short-term promissory note issued primarily by corporations with maturities ranging from two to 270 days. The credit risk of almost all commercial paper is rated by a rating service. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report A financial report that encompasses all funds of the government. In the financial section of the CAFR are the basic financial statements and required supplementary information as well as combining and individual fund financial statements, as necessary. The CAFR also contains introductory information and statistical data. Current Financial Resources Measurement Focus A measurement focuses that reports on the near -term or current inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable financial resources. This focus is unique to accounting and financial reporting for state and local governments and is used for reporting the financial position and results of operations of governmental funds. Debt An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and services. Debts of governments include bonds, time warrants, and notes. Debt Coverage Ratio The ratio of pledged revenues to related debt service for a given year. Debt Limit The maximum amount of outstanding gross or net debt legally permitted. Debt Proceeds The difference between the face amount of debt and the issuance discount or the sum of the face amount and the issuance premium. Debt proceeds differ from cash receipts to the extent issuance costs, such as underwriters' fees, are withheld by the underwriter. Debt Service Fund A governmental fund type created to account for the accumulation of resources for and payment of general long-term debt principal and interest. The Commission has one debt service fund for its sales tax revenue bonds. Expenditures Represents decreases in net financial resources on the transfer of property or services for acquiring an asset, service, or settling a loss. Financial Advisor In the context of the issuance of debt, a consultant who advises the issuer on any of a variety of matters related to the issuance. The financial advisor sometimes also is referred to as the fiscal consultant. Financial Audit An audit made to provide independent assurance whether the financial statements of a government are presented fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Financial Resources Resources that are or will become available for spending and include cash, resources ordinarily expected to be converted to cash such as receivables, inventory, and prepaid assets. Fiscal Year For the Commission, the 12-month period that begins July 1 and ends June 30 of the designated fiscal or operating year for accounting and budgeting purposes. Fund A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts in which cash and other financial resources, all related liabilities, and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, are recorded and segregated to carry on specific activities or attain certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. Fund Balance The excess of a governmental fund's assets over its liabilities. Fund Type Any one of eleven classifications into which all funds are categorized in governmental accounting. Governmental fund types include general, special revenue, debt service, capital projects, and permanent funds. Proprietary fund types include enterprise and internal service funds. Fiduciary fund types include pension trust, investment trust, and private -purpose trust funds and agency funds. GASB 34 Statement No. 34 issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board that was implemented by the Commission in FY 2001/02. GASB 34 established new financial reporting standards for state and local governments. Under the new financial reporting model, governmental financial statements include basic financial statements that present both government -wide and fund financial statements and required supplementary information, including Management's Discussion and Analysis. GASB 45 Statement No. 45, Accounting for Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB), issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board implemented by the Commission in FY 2007/08. GASB 45 requires recognition of postretirement health care costs on an accrual basis over a period approximating the employees' years of service and to provide information about actuarial accrued liabilities associated with these benefits and whether and to what extent progress is being made in funding the plan. General Fund The governmental fund type used to account for all financial resources, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. General Ledger A record containing the accounts needed to reflect the financial position and the results of operations of a government. In double -entry bookkeeping, debit balances equal the credit balances in the general ledger. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Minimum standards and guidelines for financial accounting and reporting. GAAP encompasses the conventions, rules, and procedures that serve as the norm for the fair presentation of financial statements. The GASB is the primary authoritative accounting and financial reporting standard -setting body on the application of GAAP to state and local governments. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) Rules and procedures established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for the conduct of a financial audit. There are ten basic GAAS, classified into three broad categories: general standards, standards of fieldwork, and standards of reporting. The Auditing Standards Board of the AICPA publishes Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS) and related interpretations to comment and expand upon these basic standards. Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) Standards established by the General Accounting Office (GAO) in its publication, Government Auditing Standards, for the conduct and reporting of both financial and performance audits in the public sector. GAGAS set forth general standards applicable to both types of audits and separate standards of fieldwork and reporting for financial and performance audits. The GAGAS standards of fieldwork and reporting for financial audits incorporate and build upon GAAS. Governmental Funds Funds generally used to account for tax -supported activities. The Commission's governmental funds are comprised of general, special revenue, debt service, and capital projects funds. Grant A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function or program. Independent Auditor An auditor meeting the independence criteria set forth in GAAS and GAGAS. Internal Audit An independent appraisal of the diverse operations and controls within a government entity to determine whether acceptable policies and procedures are followed, established standards are met, resources are used efficiently and economically, and the organization's objectives are being achieved. The term covers all forms of appraisal of activities undertaken by auditors working for and within an organization. Internal Control Policies and procedures established to provide reasonable assurance that specific government objectives will be achieved. Joint Venture A legal entity or other organization resulting from a contractual agreement and that is owned, operated, or governed by two or more participants as a separate and specific activity for the benefit of the public or service recipients and in which the government retains an ongoing financial interest or ongoing financial responsibility. The Commission is a member agency of Metrolink. Legal Level of Budgetary Control The level at which a government's management may not reallocate resources without special approval from the legislative body. Loans Receivable An asset account reflecting amounts loaned to individuals or organizations external to the Commission, including notes taken as security for such loans. Measurement Focus The objective of a measurement that is what is being expressed in reporting a government's financial performance and position. A particular measurement focus considers not only which resources are measured (financial or economic), but also when the effects of transactions or events involving those resources are recognized (basis of accounting). The measurement focus of the Commission's government - wide and fiduciary fund financial statements is economic resources, whereas the measurement focus of governmental fund financial statements is current financial resources. Modified Accrual Basis The accrual basis of accounting adapted to the governmental funds' measurement focus according to which revenues and other financial resource increments (e.g., bond issue proceeds) are recognized when they become susceptible to accrual, that is when they become both "measurable" and "available to finance expenditures of the current period." Expenditures are recognized when the fund liability is incurred except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt and certain similar accrued obligations when due. The Commission's governmental funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Other Financing Sources Amounts classified separately from revenues to avoid distorting revenue trends that represent an increase in current financial resources. Other financing sources generally include general long-term debt proceeds, amounts equal to the present value of minimum lease payments arising from capital leases, proceeds from the sale of capital assets, and transfers in. Other Financing Uses Amounts classified separately from expenditures to avoid distorting expenditure trends and represent a decrease in current financial resources. Other financing uses generally include transfers out and the amount of refunding bond proceeds deposited with the escrow agent. Overhead Indirect costs that cannot be specifically associated with a given service, program, or department and thus, cannot be clearly associated with a particular functional category. Principal In the context of bonds other than deep -discount debt, the face value or par value of a bond or issue of bonds payable on stated dates of maturity. Program Group activities, operations, or organizational units directed to attaining specific purposes or objectives. Program Budget A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on the functions or activities of a government rather than to specific items of cost or to specific departments. Purchase Order A document authorizing the delivery of specified merchandise or the rendering of certain services and the making of a charge for them. Refunding Bonds Bonds issued to retire bonds already outstanding. The proceeds of refunding bonds may be used to repay the previously issued debt (current refunding) or to be placed with an escrow agent and invested until used to pay principal and interest on old debt at a future date (advance refunding). Reimbursement Grant A grant for which a potential recipient must first incur qualifying expenditures to be eligible. Restricted Fund Balance Those portions of fund balance which are restricted for specific purposes by third parties or enabling legislation. Special Revenue Fund A governmental fund type used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes. The Commission maintains special revenue funds for Measure A Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley; Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee; Freeway Service Patrol; Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies; State Transit Assistance; and Local Transportation Fund. Transfers All interfund transfers representing flows of assets between funds of the government without equivalent flows of assets in return and without a requirement for repayments. Trustee A fiduciary holding property on behalf of another. Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2013/14 Mk_ 1.11.4NlybmpolisWeielo Budget Adjustments (Draft to Final) RCTC FY 2013/14 Ending Fund Balance (as reported 5/8/13) Projected FY 2013 Adjustments: Decrease in investment income, operating transfers in, and debt proceeds (858,801,900) Increase in professional and support costs (20,000) Decrease in project operations, debt service, and operating transfers out 282,612,700 Budget FY 2014 Adjustments: Increase in federal, state and local reimbursements 7,684,000 Increase in investment income 63,000 Increase in operating transfers in 282,241,900 Increase in debt and TIFIA loan proceeds 716,774,000 Increase in salaries and benefits (951,400) Increase in professional and support costs (1,793,600) Increase in engineering and construction costs (2,520,000) Increase in design -build costs (25,050,000) Increase in right of way acquisition costs (48,269,000) Decrease in transit operating and capital distributions 6,934,000 Increase in special studies and TUMF regional arterial costs (307,500) Increase in debt service costs (102,535,100) Increase in operating transfers out (282,241,900) FY 2013/14 Ending Fund Balance (per final budget 6/12/13) $ 843,330,000 Fund Balance $ 869,510,800 4.4 nr. kginning Fund Balance total Estimated Revenues/Sources $ 590,821,600 1, 921, 987, 400 #Revenues 74,0E7,600 *Debt Proceeds $810,774,000 -Transfers$636,325,800 total Estimated Expenditures/Uses ...Expenditures x9,440,933 •Debt Service $135,712,300 •Tran54:15Out $636,325,800 (1,669,479,000) Pevenues/Sources over Expe nditures/Uses iknding Fund Balance FY 2013/14 252,508,400 $ 843,330,000 Funding Sources Revenues N Measure A Sales Tax ULTF Sales Tax L STA Sales Tax c-1 0 Federal reimbursements MState reimbursements c—i V) Local reimbursements CV TUMF ›— C Other revenues L1- � Investment income N Sources Debt proceeds TIFIA loan proceeds Transfers in Total Revenues/Sources $ 147,000,000 72,500,000 13,298,000 94,389,000 133,496,300 2,954,400 6,723,400 S00,000 4,026,500 700,774,000 110,000,000 636,325,800 $ 1,921,987,400 2 Funding Sources Comparison FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Percent Actual Budget Projected Budget Change Measure A Sales Tax 5134,984,300 $ 141,000,000 $141,000,000 $ 147,000,000 4% LTF Sales Tax 66,556,703 69,500,000 69,500,000 72,503,000 4% STA Sales Tax 13,487,500 14,212,500 14,212,5130 13,298,000 -6% Federal reimbursements 28,097,000 73,151,900 40,949,203 94,389,000 29% State reimbursements 21,411,300 17,917,800 21,306,500 133,496,300 645% Local reimbursements 2,008,600 2,6813,700 2,589,400 2,954,400 10% TUMF 8,116,400 7,557,300 7,268,203 6,723,400 -11% Other revenues 1,430,100 882,800 493,5130 500,000 -43% Investment income 4,30E1,300 7,265,900 3,986,300 4,026,500 -45% Total Revenues 280,400,200 334,176,900 301,305,600 474,887,600 42% Debt proceeds 40,000,000 1,220,172,000 80,000,000 700,774,000 -43% TIFIA loan proceeds 110,000,000 N/A Transfers in 123,977,200 328,118,600 125,536,100 636,325,800 94% Total Revenues/Sources $444,377,400 $1,882,467,500 $506,841,700 $1,921,987,400 2% Summary of Uses RGTC x Management Services 'Et RcTe Management Services Expenditures/Uses FY2011J32 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2073/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Executive Management $ 214,700 $ 283,200 $ 237,800 Administration 1,238,100 1,502,200 1,196,000 Legislative Affairs and Communications 927,900 1,244,300 953,200 Finance 5,333,900 4,999,500 4,547,000 Debt Service 25,200 - - Total Expenditures 7,739,800 8,029,200 6,934,000 8,935,400 Transfers Out 10,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Total Management Services $ 17,739,800 $ 13,029,200 $ 11,934,000 $ 13,585,400 E'en:Eye Management 3% • Adnini•51.=.pripn 22% tesiFlative Affairs and Communications 14% finautet 61% $ 258,900 1,865,400 1,248,400 5,212,700 Regional Programs RCM Regional Programs Expenditures/Uses FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Planning and Programming Services $ 3,399,900 $ 4,994,100 $ 3,538,600 $ 5,845,000 Rail Maintenance and Operations 20,202,600 14,553,300 11,564,300 15,485,600 Public and Specialized Transit 53,158,100 84,811,200 59,406,500 106,803,900 Commuter Assistance 3,157,600 4,038,800 4,197,400 4,411,700 Motorist Assistance 3,846,300 4,848,000 4,727,600 5,464,600 Total Expenditures Transfers Out Total Regional Programs Planning and Programming 5% Rail Maintenance and Operations 11% 83,764,500 113,245,400 83,434,400 198,010,800 16,167,100 21,105,200 19,809,0C° 15,369,Z00 $ 99,931,600 $ 134,350,600 $ 103,243,400 $ 153,380,000 Public and Specialized Transit 77% Commuter Assistance 3% Motorist Assistante 4% s Capital Program Uses RCTC Nom DanIS Capital Program Expenditures/Uses FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Salaries and benefits $ 2,26.9,400 $ 3,113,100 $ 2,934,200 $ 3,339,800 Professional costs 5,057,500 7,692,500 7,321,700 19,260,400 Support costs 300,700, 597,100 302,900 S07,300 Projects and operations: Program operations 5,416,600 11,852,300 7,431,800 12,197,600 Engineering 21,366,500 27,892,500 16,540,900 20,355,000 Construction 27,451,200 125,934,100 61,628,030 240,968,400 Design build 16,285,700 29,050,000 29,050,000 217,750,000 Right of way and land 53,728,100 112,246,800 64,716,400 164,707,800 Local streets and roads 40,127,900 42,129,000 42,129,000 43,825,900 Regional arterials 8,962,700 16,455,400 20,500,400 25,157,500 Other 209,200 515,000 148,300 2,375,000 Debt service 61,507,400 143,413,000 22,990,600 135,712,300 Total Expenditures 242,681,900 520,890,800 275,694,200 886,557,000 Transfers out 97,810,100 302,013,400 100,727,100 615,956,600 Total Capital Project Development 8, Delivery 5340,492,000 $ 822,904,200 $ 376,421,300 $1,502,513,600 -111111.11111111111-, Capital Projects & Operations ExpendituresRCTC Projects and Operations • 49% Professional costs Salaries and benefits 1% f/# Weir build Ja% Right of way Ind land 23% lepul nrdaatsad,a.sit�s LWaia W r J% Capita) Project Expenditure Highlights SR-91 HOV Lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 SR-91, I-15 and 1-215 Corridor Improvements FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2012/13 FY 2013/14 Actual Budget Projected Budget Personnel $ 6,072,600 $ 6,971,100 $ 6,960,200 $ 7,949,400 Professional 11,632,200 14,676,700 13,360,700 26,675,500 Support 3,728,100 5,333,300 4,586,900 5,593,300 Projects and operations 251,011,000 471,323,600 317,959,000 856,426,500 Capital outlay 209,700 447,700 205,200 796,200 Debt service 61,532,600 143,413,000 22,990,600 135,712,300 Total Expenditures 334,186,200 642,165,400 366,062,600 1,033,153,200 Transfers out 123,977,200 328,118600 125,536,100 636325,800 Total Expenditures/Uses $458,163,400 $ 970,284,000 $491,598,700 $1,669,479,000 Personnel, Professional, Support, and Capital Outlay Expenditures 6 Personnel Commission Action May 8, 2013 Addition of Four Positions • Planning & Programming Director • Human Resources Administrator • Capital Projects Manager • Facilities Administrator Market Equity Adjustments • Market adjustments needed in 16 positions to meet the minimum salary range. • Remain competitive in Commission's labor market. Pension Reform — Resolution No. 13-005 • Employees' contribution of 3%toward normal pension costs, offset by corresponding cost of living adjustment. RCM Performance Rased Merit Increases • Provide a pool not to exceed 3% for merit increases based on performance. Measure A Management Services � 14 N ext Ste ps Continue monitoring revenues Measure A administrative management services salaries and benefits Funding needs for projects and transit operators ROTC Sales tax and TUMF revenue trends Timeliness of federal and state reimbursements Close public hearing and adopt budget Review the final budget draft, close the public hearing, and adopt the final budget 8 REVISION TO AGENDA ITEM 7 Additions are noted by Bold Italics, Deletions are noted by S ket-Iffeugh RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: William Von Klug, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Four Three Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permancnt Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in All or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102 270 010; 1 17-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 11 Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a1 The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b1 The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c1 The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-006, 13 007, 13-010, and 13-01 1, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Pcrmancnt Acccss Eascmcnt, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102 270 010, 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Agenda Item 7 Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP►, which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is being asked to consider the adoption of four resolutions of necessity declaring its intent to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access weemcnt, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in all or in portions of certain real property, by eminent domain, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. (APNs) 102-020-044; 102 270 010; 1 17-270-002; 1 15-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; and for the widening, maintenance, and operational improvements of SR-91 CIP. The immediate need for the property acquisitions is to proceed with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. The acquisitions are required for and will benefit the community by providing additional lanes to ease current traffic congestion along the SR-91 through the city of Corona in Riverside County, California. Preliminary title reports and/or litigation guarantees were obtained from Lawyers Title Insurance Company to confirm and identify the record owners of the parcels affected by the Project. The Commission then served the affected property owners with notices of the Commission's decision to appraise the property. The Commission had the properties appraised and made offers to the record owners. Negotiations were unsuccessful for the purchase of the interests necessary for the SR-91 CIP. The adoption of resolutions of necessity for the interests will not prevent negotiations from continuing. Since an agreement has not been reached with the owners of record, it may be necessary to acquire the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access cvscmcnt, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests described in the attachments by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is accomplished by the Commission's adoption of resolutions of necessity for the affected property. Description of Property to be Acquired 1) APN 102-020-044, the larger parcel, is owned by the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona. The property is a vacant lot Located on the south side of Wardlow Road, approximately 0.25 miles east of Research Drive, in the city of Corona, California. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and Agenda Item 7 temporary construction easement interests in portions of the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-006. 2) /LPN 102 270 010 is owned by Com-Ha -Dynasty Suites, Inc., a California corporation. The site address of the property is 1805 West 6'h Street, Corona, California. The property is impHave-d• with a hotel and comprises a i-aHd-af E'c^rv,-jost-anav rvre-ueFe,---14-is-nee$S'.sury-ce-ue-qa;re-the-eR tFFe-1 to accommodate relocation of the 6th and Maple Strccts onramp to c\astbound SR 91. The legal description and map of the property to bo a��;�,o.J ., ..h�h+t-te-�e�ei�•f�.,., AI.,. 1 3) APN 1 17-270-002, is owned by Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez. The property comprises a land area of approximately 30,056 square feet and is improved with a truck driving school. The site address of the property is 107 N. Joy Street, Corona, California. It is necessary to acquire the entire parcel to accommodate the realignment of Joy and Pearl Streets near the 91 /15 interchange. The legal description and map of the property to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-010. 4) APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, the larger parcel, are owned by Pearl Street Properties, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. The property comprises a land area of approximately 8.18 acres. The site address of the property is 105 and 211 Pearl Street, Corona, California. The property is improved with warehouse structures. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission to acquire a fee portion of the larger parcel, a well as a permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-01 1. Project Description The SR-91 CIP is generally described as extending the existing 91 Express Lanes into Riverside County for a distance of approximately eight miles; the addition of a general purpose lane in each direction from the 71 /91 interchange to 1-15, the improvement of five local interchanges within the city of Corona and the addition of auxiliary lanes and other operational improvements throughtout the project limits. Agenda Item 7 DISCUSS/ON: Hearings and Required Findings The action requested of the Commission at the conclusion of this hearing is the adoption of resolutions of necessity, authorizing the acquisition of real property interests by eminent domain. The property owners are: 1) Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona, APN 102-020-044 — fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests. 2) Corona Dynasty Suites, mac., -A-PN 1-0-2 270 01-0• full acquisition in fee. 3) Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, APN 117-270-002 - full acquisition in fee. 4) Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 — part acquisition in fee, permanent wall footing easement, permancnt acccss easemcnt, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests. The properties are further identified in the legal definitions, descriptions, and depictions attached to the respective resolution. California eminent domain law provides that a public entity may not commence with eminent domain proceedings until its governing body has adopted a resolution of necessity, which resolution may only be adopted after the governing body has given each party with an interest in the affected property, or their representatives, a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. Notices of the hearing were sent by first class mail to the property owners, and stated the Commission's intent to consider the adoption of resolutions, the right of the property owners to appear and be heard on these issues, and that failure to file a written request to appear would result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission scheduled this hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date of notice was mailed may appear and be Agenda Item 7 heard. The Commission's legal counsel mailed the required notices to the property owners, on April 26, 2013, and May 24, 2013, in accordance with the California Code of Civil Procedure, section 1245.235. The property owners were also invited to meet with Commission and Caltrans staff to address any concerns the property owners may have with the design of the project in the manner proposed and the necessity of the acquisition. The four required findings are addressed as follows: 1) Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proposed Project The acquisition of the properties is necessary to construct the SR-91 CIP, which will reduce traffic congestion and enhance safety, as well as provide an alternative means of transportation along the SR-91 corridor and includes connections to 1-15 in Riverside County. The SR-91 CIP includes adding general purpose lanes and extending tolled express lanes. 2) The Project is Planned or Located in a Manner that will be Most Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury A thorough analysis was conducted to find the single best location for this project. Environmental analyses and findings indicate that these sites uniquely satisfy the engineering, public health, and environmental issues, and these locations are the most compatible with the greatest public good. These locations will result in the least private injury. 3) The Property Sought to be Acquired is Necessary for the Proposed Project As described above, a careful analysis was performed regarding these locations and what property and property rights were needed, and these parcels meet all the desired characteristics for the construction of the improvements for the project. 4) The Offer of Just Compensation has been Made Appraisals were prepared by appraisal firms Lidgard and Associates and Kiley Company, to establish the fair market value of the real property the Commission is seeking to acquire from the interest owned by the property owners identified herein. Review appraisals were prepared by Hennessey & Hennessey LLC. Fixture and Equipment Appraisals were prepared by Hodges Lacey & Associates, LLC and Desmond, Marcell° & Amster. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the property interests, based on the approved appraisals, as required by Section 7267.2 Agenda Item 7 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the interests sought through eminent domain, to ensure the property will be available to meet the time frames associated with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. Environmental Analysis Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act has been satisfied by Caltrans' certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) in its role as lead agency on August 8, 2012, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission's subsequent consideration of that certified EIR in its role as a responsible agency on November 14, 2012. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Notice of Public Hearing Notices of Hearing to Property Owners were mailed on April 26, 2013 to the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona; Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc.; Pearl Street Properties, LLC; and on May 24, 2013, to Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, the owners of record. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 13-006 2) Resolution No. 13 007 3) Resolution No. 13-010 4) Resolution No. 13-01 1 Agenda Item 7 RESOLUTION NO. 13-011 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, —PERMANENT —ACCESS CACCIIAENTPERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, AND 117-270-013, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent eeeess-easem7ent7 permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is .a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," . also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to, reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove, at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limited to sewers, water, electrical systems and communication systems, consisting wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholds, and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in, under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in 17336M2 100\7888203.1 FY14IRIT A. PA[8F 4 connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 173:46.02100\7 88203.1 FYFIIRIT 0_ DAMP 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT 'Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81'40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°40'38" West 19.65 feet continuing along said general southerly line to the beginning of a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 15.87 feet through a central angle of 36°21'56"; thence South 81°26'22" East 29.38 feet to a point on said westerly line, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 52°17'05" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle .of 01°55'52" to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 130 square feet See Exhibit `AT attached hereto and made apart hereof. PALPTG0105011SURVEY\LEGALS122275, APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-1-FeeAocx Pagel of 10/17/2012 FYFIIRIT A_ PAAF 3 1 PSOMAS 2 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 3 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to 4 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 5 6 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 7 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 8 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 9 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 10 11 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 15 16 elest4 -/ 17 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG010501kSURVEYlLEGALS122275 APN 117-270-007kLegals\22275-1-Fee.docx Page 2 of 2 10/17/2012 F]INIRIT A_ PAC= A EXI-IIB T A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 130 SO. FT. 117-270-007. SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 1"-270_004 Q. 0 1` ` �S.. F. R,,q, Lu �19'�0 ,� cr p-02T 115 060-016 ., 1-•_ f -- I °cL, z 1 LIJ DOC, NO. 2006-0565691 O.R. PCL 1 a 11 7-270-006 I ' _ --------- 6. S 63/ab ____ I 212./4 POB I;'�` i T P0B y 365 � SHEET 2 � I 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING ,li., LEGEND "' POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( } Title to State j I I l I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on cC5 1983(2007.00) zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5 FEE ACOUISlTIO>l -- distances. All distances are in feet unless otherv,iise noted. - =. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Kutten Centre °rive, Ste. 200 Sante Ana Co1,fornto 9270 f71d4751-7373s£3ftbSt S-e8e3 {f5x! DATE: 06-15-12 REV,: 10-17-12 EA: 0F540 FAs:: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM - SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I U 91 �-y cc Tr , 9 1 [ FYNIRIT A_ Pat= A EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL.# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP 130 SOS T, 117-27Q-QQ7 1 r W ct- � -, kJ I t L _ 3 00 9.21 ' S44 °q t d�36c _ R�/5'87, Jo 3 M N O N. o M 8 W(R) 2i 'S6 � ° ' A1"w S� 0 AZ oho° ,,.,; 81 °26 � s SOUTH RJ VERSI DE LAND AND WATER DoMPANY MS' 9/6 gal p. PDt 2 DUD, NU„ 2JJb�JJ���i671 J. � , '-; �, 0 t`) �\ D ,9� ,_a D �� cP_ � (b �o —gyp -5� 1 _ `'� O -. "22"Est 5 `'� 3e+� 4-010 -- 41R_ 55'S2 _ram 06 3' N to .65' L`6.965 1 81 4p•38„ W N81 °40,38 W rPoB 212.1 q �Ropas�a Raw ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 2°Ak , LEGEND POB Indicotes Point TPOB Indicates True (R) Indicates Radial Of Beginning Point Of Beginning Bearing C ) Title to State 1 I 1 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES FEET 2 2 2 7 5 -1 FEE AC011151T10N E }lummummummq Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 60 0 10 20 40 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 t0.,tton Centre Drive Ste. 100 0tto s35-87eiS•737i(7tets5e03 teoxl DATE: 6-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PIS SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS g RIV 91 6.9 , - 2 FYIIIRIT 0_ POrF R P S 3 4 ! Ca'trans Parcel No. 22275-2 5 f Fee Acquisition 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 1.0 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 ! 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 191.5, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside Cc:nutty, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said I 17 ; point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 1.76.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 90 02°51'28"; thence South 81°26'22" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave I 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41'20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve 25 339.28 feet through a central angle of 06°51'08" to the beginning of a non -tangent curve 26 concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 27 South 14°40'09" Fast; thence easterly along said curve 48.35 feet through a central angle i 28 01'00'58'35" to the general easterly line of said Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 29 73.38 feet alonYthe general easterly line of said Parcel 4 to the southeasterly corner 30 thereof and the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius 31 of 1,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 18°23'1.6" East; thence westerly EXHIBIT `Bl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION M=2PTG010501\SURvL-YILEGALS122275_APN_117-270-f 5_.117-270-013__.11.5-060-013`Legals`22275-2-FEE.doex 6/712013 Page 1 of 2 FWBURIT A_ PAAF 7 1 along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4 and along said curve 199.21 feet through a central angle of 05°51'11" to the most southerly comer thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; thence South 41 ° 19'57" East 15.92 feet along said Northeasterly line to the most easterly corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78'5824" West 131.00 feet to the most easterly corner at said Parcel 1, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 08'20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses; 1) along said curve 581.97 feet through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40' 38" West 123.15 feet to the Point of Beginning. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Containing 41,255 square feet. 13 14 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 15 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 16 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 17 18 j See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made a part .hereof.. 19 20 t The distances describedherein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 21 System of 1983, Lone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 22 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 23 E combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 24 25 26 27 Prepared under the direction of 28 29 30 31 Brian. E. Bullock, PI,S 5260 Date 1.0.`,2PTG01050IvSLRVEY.LT'(;ALSV22275 APN lf'270-005 17-270-0I3 1j5-060-073Teeah',22275-2-IsEE.docx 617,001.3 Page 2 6172 FX411RIT A_ PAC4F R EXHI IT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE. PEARL STREET PROP, 41,255 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 `-__-SHEET i J 2 1 OD,I l SHEET INDEX SHEET 4 SHEET 5 I i I 3 H 7-270-0031 7 i _i i 1 "± --I--004 o I; a t. I i I lIc 1, 1: �, _ IQ t- _ 777_27p` _ `- SHEET PSI_, (A e To - - _�� � I �s R f-_- (-''`=`- �„• R.R. I ,,9_ CIO, 2006-05E�5�9II 0,R.. I POL : ) I ;�_�, I I 63/, b - ----------- ---- I - - _ -�_ '-_�_ ` �C- ---- � ,, - ,, RIVERSIDE _ 115-060-016 I I --- , Pei L-` `— __ -- E I I �y -- t-2. I „7-z7o-oo6 I ---------------------- _--- P 0 B� FREEWAY 2 365 ROUTE 91 y j T 360 ROUTE 91 /RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 1 C/L STATIONING LEGEND PO4 Indicates TPOB ,indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing State Prohibited ( ) Title to 11 1 1 1 Access NOTES FEET 2 FEE 10v 200 _ 7 5 -� ACQUISITION - fy� Coordinates and bearings are on cc5 1983(200/.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0,99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. �W` 0 COO a0o PREPARED BY: d a ,`.a .. 'rs .., .if, s = t=:,r. DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO, TOTAL SHEETS 8 L RIV 91 6.9 5 FYMIRIT e_ PeAF Q EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. L11,255 SO. FT. ? 1 5.- 60-01 3 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 ' FOR, SnUTH W 4 4, cc t 7 � f �ti a w Q.r � \ � ---- o o t �j V - -_.'- :i—�� PROPOSED R/W I_OT RI AND l�lr� q I'lIJ' -- _/� I -- �� -� o . o P ;0 o rn c ROUTE �,JR�:J ;7R 3; Eli 001< / 3. } COMPANY` ��7 //; f10C, No, 05�5�91 — — — — — — [102° 51 '28" R=1 76.53' !=8.81---- S81 °26.22"E _ 5 7.2 2 -- _ 1-� �- �- — �w15°25`1G" EXISTING R/W 200 -- 3,R, — — - -- _ + 6 r .21 20R SY C T l Oil 30 ,�v ; f ��a �A;'�HO -i SOFIR N 1r E 11 a } PrL, 1 Drip, NO, 2006�- — — — 0-5. 5�9i 0,R, -- l S� /'a6 1 .. �.3 j l -— — — — R=2851.00' L=767,34' rO w w In - N81 °40'38"W POB 1 23.1 5' FREEWAY °� P (-) V 91 RIVERSIDE ��J- 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE C/� STATIONING j 3 6 0 LEGEND POB Indicates TPOB Indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State J I lit Arc,-ss Prohibited NOTES FFET 2 2, 7 - Fr ACQUISITIC,ti �- Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1963(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet ;Iniess otherwise noted. 15v — O 26 S3 100 PREPARED BY: c - ., r, _.. DATE: 06-15-12 REV.:06-07--13 EA: OF540 Fik#: DISTRICT COUNTY - r ROUTE SWEET PM !SHEET 10. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV j 91 '6.9 2 FYNIRIT A_ PIMP in EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE - PEARL STREET PROP. 41,255 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 CV F— w w w w FOR, GECT I ON 30 T,38„; R,6W, RANCHO EL Si BRAN T r 'SAS I /9 U `>- Q=15°25'16" n=16°40'20" N81 °40'38"W 123.15' PC1 , I DOC a NO, 2006- 0565691 0, R. PROPOSED R/W R=2851 .00' R=2000.00' EXISTING R/W/ L=581.97' ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearina (----) Title to State 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited 2 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 363 Q w w Cr) w w NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on %CS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275®2 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 25 50 100 ,50 PREPARED BY: ?'73!(71.1it"145-as63 (Fox) DATE: 06-1 5-12 DISTRICT 8 REV,:06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: COUNTY R I '. ROUTE _)1 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 3 TOTAL SHEETS FYMIRIT A_ PACW 44 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 1.,255 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 w w w w POR , SECTION 30 T, 35 R.8111, RAf 1CHn EL SOORAN,T E Mg 118 PCL , 1 OOC. NO, 2008 05656 9 J 0 R . , I PROPOSED R/W 0-16° 40120" 406° 38' 56„Ei R)- NQ1°20 45 NIv' 18.211 .0 ' 7 . 4` '785�1 0 �� , 6 _ ROTE 365 R ,2000 . LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True. Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ) Title to State t Access Prohibited J C L ., 3 PDOC, NO. 2006- -- 05631-)91,MR, P 00C. NO, 200A-- -06° 51 f 08, i h L;=5a1.97 0` 508° 20' lR} �'ST�"� ICE �REE��. '91RIVERS POR , LOT, 12-A- ASSESSOR'S MAP NO, 31 A1' S 1 /42-43 T R,2831'p°/' , ui339,28 ,' 131,00• "= 1478°58'244 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING V) E- LU W w w v7 NOTES Coordinates and bearings fire on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain around distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: nno, GDr;vn ar' - ti2 07 51.7177 ei5.;5 s188 rx? DATE: 06-15-2012 REV.: 06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICTi!COUNTY ROUTF_1 SHEET PM u R1V 91 I 6.9 SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 4 5 FICHIRIT A_ PIMP 17 EXHIBIT B2 A. T & SoF, R.R. R� A=00°58'35" R=2837.00' L=4803r,` S15°38'45''E (R) S13°30'03"E (R) ?N /WI l PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP, 41,255 SOo FT. 115-060-013 v15 1 1 I-210-005 & 01 I_.., r DOG.. No, 200b- 0565691 J,R, -- 1 31 , 00 '�,-• -� s, N78°58'24 'W 's9'° 22275- r `9� J9s ROU� G cj1 I�T, !�1 �.sSrJR ` v (11Jr'1R" 1\1J 3 I !1 I 1 19 -4)3 F LEGEND ROB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State ! 1 1 1 I Access Prohibited 9A 1 R a) a; , N ) N rn N 0 O) 0 R 11 5-060-01 5 3'( ° \ ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS, 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 2 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION 100 PREPARED BY: DATE:06-15-12 REV.:06-07-13 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT 8 i COUNTY ROUTE! SHEET PM SHEET NO TOTAL SHEETS FXNIRIT A_ PAR: 41 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `CV LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-3 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40' 38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 696 feet through a central angle of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°26'22" West 29.38 feet to a point on the general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03°07'25" to the True Point of Beginning. PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275_APN 117-270-007\Legals122275-3-PE,docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 FYNIRIT A_ PACIF �d PS CAMAS 1 Containing 235 square feet. 2 3 See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on Califomia Coordinate 6 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 7 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 9 10 11 Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 15 6Stati /LY 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG0105011SURVEYTEGALS122275_APN 117-270-007Tegals122275-3-PE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/ 17/2012 - FY411RIT A_ PA1iF �5 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275--3 E SMT PEARL STREET PROP. 235 SO. F T . 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 DOB, NO, 006-- 0565691 0,R FOL., J R s' 63/66 ----- N81'4038"W 212.14' SHEET 2 j 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing (--- } Title to State 11 I I l Access Prohibited 1115-060-016 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASE ENT FEPT 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: O A 3 14,ofto,n Centre Greve Ste. 260 9,707 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 F Att: DISTRICT COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 6.9 i i 2 FXFIIRIT A_ PA(:F 9R EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR I AREA A P N 22275-3 IESMT PEARL STREET PROP i 235 SO.FT. 117-270-007 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH ' I C1 25.00' 24°40'57" 10.77' III �--__ C2 206.53' 03°07'25" 11.26' j RADIAL DATA 1 BEARING A,,,� LR� R1 569°22'14"W W o q2 0 (J) Fel 2 � w DOC .. NO, 2JJ�~- 05(:)5 J l O , R . a ti , FOR , I_OT 3 y F i_OCI‹ 73 ! �'oo � SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND co z \ �� AND WATER GOMPAN`>✓ 0 a=89°57 ,74r, __ — �"cP_ �0 ��"� R,=25.00' E+'7 `006, —�•y���4 — `� O -� .� - - 39.27 S81 ° ::A' 22„� �`Sv'_S C7 ,,,,..28.54, G'L o 1�eG, NB,, °r 1cD "_ ►. �.� � 7 9.65' v 41707 ° Jr. 5, �+e R=,206 53-' — -- L.7--6.96 I 22275 - PN81 °40,38„W N81 °40,38°,w � 272 pig 7.1 PROPOSED Riw LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( ) Title to State 91 i l 1 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 22 2 - PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances_ Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: 3',= Cen4re 1'rlve Ste. '<00 014) ano,rm torso -a n7 (7+a 53-7,." 1( 4i545 8e83 £�Gni DATE: 6-15--12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA:OF540 FAa: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS v 8 R I V 91 �3 6.9 2 FY1111RIT A_ PACiF 47 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `DI' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-4 Permanent Wall Footink Easement APN 117-270-005 & 013 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 02°51'28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet through a central angle of 04°34'41' ; thence South 81 °26'22" East 68.83 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37'; thence South 41°19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°51'38" East; thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 81'26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 6,614 square feet. P:\2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGAL.S122275_APAi_t 17-270-005 anti 013 115-060-013 and 015i1.ega1s122275-4-PE.docx 10/9/2012 Page 1 of 2 FIMIRIT A_ PAriF 151 PS OMAS See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 ( Prepared under the direction of 9 10 11 2:-/5:e.e144 12 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /o-69--oZ Date P:12PTG010501\SURVEY?LEGALS122275 _ APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015\legals\22275.4-PE.docx 10/9/2012 _ Page 2 of 2 FYNIRIT 0_ P06AF 1Q EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 117-270-003 117-270-006i 360 SHEET INDEX SHEET 3 SHEET 4 . R, revrtit n--trnT ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Beoring ( } Title to State 1 I 1 11 Access Prohibited IS 060-016 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and totioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: O A 5 3 Ru9ton r±ntrt tir+vR Ste.. 200 Santa Ara, Cotrf rain 92707 DATE: 06-15--12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAX: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM !SHEET NO. h TOTAL SHEETS 4 FYFIIRIT 0_ POPF 911 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL.STREET PROP. 6614 SO.ET. 117-270-005 & Ot3 POR , SECTION 30 POR. LOT 3; 2LOCK 73 T,3S,; R.6W. SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO W I AND WATER COMPANY EL SOSRANTE W I Mrd 9/6 MP IlB ( rPOR, PCL, 2 PCL, 1 -../ I DOG. NO. 2006- DOC , NO, 2006- Q 1 0565691 O,R. � 056569.1 O.R. --__ I R,S, 63166 -- c-C S45°24'51"W(R).W_ �p S40° 50' 1 0"W(R) L 1 - - -- _ _ _ IL • ^+■■wt�7 �. -�-- 6=1 5° 1 8'37" R=284 .00' = Pr) /- Aii:a3 . PROPOSED R/W - C.'� N81°40'38"W r ik 161.21 C2 Cl EXISTING R/W 1°23.15' � .. N81 40'38"W TPOB � ul w Lii cn N S37°58'42"CR) POB //�.��yr�+� CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE C1 C2 02° 51 '28" 04°34'41" t 76.53' 176.53' 8.81 ' 14.10' L 1 L2 S81 ° 26'22"E N81°26'22"W 68.83' 57.221 C3 15°25'16" 2851 .00' 767.34' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Cll.. STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TFOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 1 C Title to State. f 1 1 1_1 Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 198312007.00) ?one 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. �— �� I FEET d 25 56 744 150 PREPARED BY: SOMAS 3 Hutton Cen.t,:e Dr;ee. Ste. 2C:) 're Anp Cacti r I ?-161 (. sa 75f^�3'.3ts'TIa}445-898_ taxi DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS - 8 - I tf R I �t 91 6.9 2 1 FYNIRIT 0_ POrF 71 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# 22275--4 TITLE FSMT GRANTOR AREA PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SOFT. APN 117-270-005 & 013 ,moon, SECTION 30 T,3S,; F2.SI , RANCHO EL SOSRANTE MB 1 /2 (V ©=15° 1 8'37" A=1 5°25'16" 1 R,S, PROPOSED R/W PGL , 1 DOC,• N0. 2006- .566691 O,R,- =16°40'20" R=2000.00' w N81 °40'384 Ln 123.15' LEGEND EXISTING R/W L=581 .97' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ) Title to State 1 1 I 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CGS 1983(2007.00) Zane 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. r-• FEET 0 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT 25 50 100 150 PPEPAREb BY: PSOMAS 3 Hart ton Centre Ste. 200 Sang nnc,, to?ifornlp 92707 utio?5t-71 3/(71.41545-8M (Fcx! DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: 0F540 DISTRICT 8 COUNTY R I V ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET N FA#: 0, TOTAL. SHEETS A FYNIRIT 0_ POPF 99 EXH BIT 132 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP.i6614 SO..FT, 117-270-005 & 013 PO1�, SEG"r1 ON 7 38 S E °1. 61� . r RANCHO `, ;JAL. 3,,� -' EL SOn^RANIE JJ6'. NO, 2006- 0565691 O.R. R.S. 63/66 -- PCL. 1 i --- DOO AlC). 2006-- -- 056569I 0. R. s i p03°� _- soe r — f , ram,..9.71 ^- POR. LOT. I2�A ASSESSOR S MAP ._.._ w — --- N O , 31 _ �:ANIS 1/42`43 -,_ ---00C . NO.. 2006- l . 0565691 O.R. 15`,' ,--' .6 26 , PROPOSED R/W _ ._._ r , 1_ 759.6g., ___ -- i 5° 18,,/" R Z$43 Oa a, . . ----- p 7 67 , 3 ©_15°25'1' R 2851 00, SO6 51`38„E(R1 S41 ° 1 9`57"E 1 2.1 3' N78 L,.s ten ( w tii 1_-5g1.9 58,2g1v __.--.; --� R=2000=00 t�E(R) _ 6° 401ZO S08°0 59 ExtsTtrac Riw DE FREEp,Y 9� R1VE RSI ROu' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring ( Title to State ,,,) 1 1 l 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on GCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.999974.76 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. roellommilioe.-w FEET 0 25 50 tad 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 hrutfon Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Some A+ro. Confcrnlo 52701 ,714051.7372/(71-M45-2BB3 trexi DATE:06-15-12 REV,: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA:: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RI V _ 91 � /- 6• �y �J � A _ i.. 4 . FYMIRIT A_ PArF 93 PS 4MAS EXIIIBIT `F1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-6 Permanent Utility Easement j 6 APN 115-060-013 & 015 7- 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence along the general northerly 13 line thereof the followipg two (2) courses: 1) North 77°34'12" West 140.88 feet to the 14 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 and 2) westerly along 15 said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 00°45'34" to a point thereon; thence 16 South 02°32'29" West 95.94 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave 17 northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 18 09°59'54"East; thence westerly along said curve 73.33 feet through a central angle of 19 01 °28'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing westerly along said 20 2,837.00 foot radius curve 14.82 feet through a central angle of 00°17'58"; thence North 21 39° 12'38" East 32.30 feet; thence North 51'44'48" West 248.65 feet to a point an the 22 northerly line of said Parcel 3; thence South 74°26'30" East 64.80 feet along said 23 northerly line to a point thereon; thence South 51 °44'48" East 206.79 feet; thence South 24 39°12'38" West 25.00 feet; thence North 51°44'48" West 7.50 feet; thence South 25 39°12'38" West 21.53 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 26 27 Containing 6,181 square feet. 28 29 See Exhibit `F2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 30 31 P:1.2PT.601050i1SURVEYILEGALS122275 APN_117-270-005 and 013_11.5-060-013 and 0151Legals\,22275-6-PUE,dpcx Page = of 2 10/9/2012 FICHIRIT A_ PACF 9d PS OMAS 1 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2g 29 30 31 Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 l� -D9-12 Date P:12PTG0i050DSURVEY\LEGALS122275 APN_1 i 7-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015iLegais122275.6-PUE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 FYNIRIT A_ PARF 70 R EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-6 PUE PEARL STRFET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 E 117-270-0o4 o o 1- SHEET 2 A. ro . SF' • R. R , r19_3p0-021r ti1 1,-060-016 ~ 22275 ';6 ecj JJC. W PCI , 2 - NO. 2006-0565691 U.R. \ POL. , 1 .., R,S, p�L... 3/66 I''' 1 PCL. 4 1.11/"' ( PCIB ------------ -------- ---- ------b-____- - YPOB 117-270-007 3JO 117-270-006 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY \ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L. STATIONING v LEGEND .POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring C... ) Title to State i I I i i, Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 - 6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT -- ground f-� distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 2; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: PSONAS i hurtc0 Centre 6r=ve. Sfe- 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM. SHEET NOJTOTAL SHEETS 2,3M0 Ana, cnr fprni0 42702 (7141751-2' 3201.m4s-a nN {rag) _ 8 RIV n .J1 �^ 6.9. 1 i 2 FICHIRIT 0_ PA(:F 7R EXHIBIT F2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-6 PUE PEARL STREET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 s'4°26'30-E 146.4 63J b, s . PROPOSED R/w p 16° 40R�2000.00 � 581 .9r CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00°45'34" 5779.66" 76.62' C2 01 °28'52'. 2837.00" 73.33' C3 00°17'58" 2837.00' 14.82' A. 4'402°39'10" R`5779.66" EXISTING R/W LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State ill 1 l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. A11 distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. a RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 51 3° 1 1 '22"w R2 509°59'54"E R3 508° 31 '02"E R4 508°13'04"E LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 N39°12'38"E 32.30' L2 539°12'38"W 25.00' L3 N51°44'48"w 7.50' L4 S39°12'38"w 21.53' 6 S.F. R. R. 7 -" N ct -"Nd1 M in 0 N _CD 59, C1 N77°3 14 POR. LOT, I2-A ASSESSOR ' S MAP NO, 31 Ams 1 /42- 3 FOL. 4 4:"000. NO. 2006- 0 056691 G . ,O .pp' ,R- l ° 23` SA'6 ►v731 0V 1 ,14,° S415.9257 E ARE i`�ERSID. R � R 22275-6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT 1111.1111. FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY. 3 Hutton centre Dri..ef Ste. 200 Sort° Ann, CWiforni© �270", :714+7e1-73131{714}545-68S3 4'0,0 DATE: 06-15-2012 REV.: 2; 10-09-12 EA: Of540 f Att: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIB- I 91 F,g 2 FY411RIT A_ PAIMF 97 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `GU LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-7 Temporary Construction Easement A.PN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 18.22 feet through a central angle of 05°03'17" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 28.54 feet to a point on said general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 69°22'14" West; thence northerly along said curve and said general southerly line 12.54 feet through a central angle of 28°44'54" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 21.31 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 59°49'01" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 15.89 feet through a central angle of 04°24'31 " to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 304 square feet. PA2PTG01050115URVEYILEGALS122275_APN_117-270-0071Legals'22275-7-TCE.docx Page 1 of 2 10/ 17/2012 FY411RIT A_ PAPF 9A PS OMAS 1 2 See Exhibit `G2' attached hereto and made apart hereof: 3 4 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 5 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 6 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 7 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 8 9 10 Prepared under the direction of it 12 13 V 14 e". 15 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 /047--/Z Date PA2PTG010501lSURVEYILEGALS122275_APN_i 17-270-0071Lega1s122275-7-TCE.docx Page 2 of 10/17/2012 FY411RIT A_ PARF 94 PARCEL# 22275-7 117-270-003 t LSHEET 2 360 TITLE t1,_270-00q EXHIBIT G2 GRANTOR I -AREA 304 SO. FT. SHEET INDEX 1 t 7-270-006 I _ E' S, 63/66 2:TPOBT.-1_ -_ ___ - - ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (RI Indicates Radial Bearing } Title to State I i 1 l Access Prohibited 365 APN 1 1 7 - 270- 007 115-060-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PS M S Ketton earrre Erne, Sty.-200 3zvd dhiJ. fore:1c 270 7 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: 0E540 FAIT: DISTRICT COUNTY RIV ROUTE �1 SHEE T PEA TOTAL SHEETS FYNIRIT A_ PILAF 3n EXHIBIT G2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-7 TCE PEARL STREET PROP 304 SOFT, 117-270-007 j r CURVE DATA r RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 25.00' 28°44'54" 12.54' 30' C2 206.53' 04°24'31" - 15.89' r RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 S69°22'14"W q�'W 0 R2 N81 ° 52'51 "W 4� S-1Q0 R3 559° 49'01 "W r \ PCL. 2 `rLJJ ODC i`JO 2GJ'o— 056569 J OR, -s P0 � r Q.®`�'• �' ° ': POR , LOT 3 y BLOCK 7:3 prcon o z R2 _ ! �-` � :OUTH i�J�JEr�Sl Otr�ANO ?��'�7``'9 ��i`I13 �11A��i�)�CII'yiPr��lY R�25.00.R 1R—�'o.—L'3g'21 N81 °26' 5 '��_ 2• i 1.9.65'_.. 8.223 LINE DATA �81 °40`�a' y� N81 °40'38“- r BEARING DISTANCE 27 2'1`1 --- _ L1 S81 ° 26'22"E 21 .31 ' PRdPpsED Raw LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicotes True Paint Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Baring ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE_ FREEWAY { } Tina to Stote ! I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground ' 2 — 7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEkfENT - - distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 ,d 20 40 60 PREPARED BY. 3 H41`,, Cc'Z7 Oriea, y1p. "a Scnto ana, Co�ifornia B<'7G7 o tij75t-7373.%43r? 5<5-3sta (Fax; DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: GF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL - SHEETS - 66 8 - p RIV 91 , Q o.,� F11411RIT A_ PARE 34 PS OMAS 1 EXHIBIT `Hl' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-8 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 s In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1 and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006.0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 1I 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 13 161,21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 22,91 feet through a central angle of 20 07°26'09" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along said easterly line and said curve 18.72 feet through 22 a central angle of 06°04'33" to a point thereon; thence South 81°26'22" East 83.19 feet to 23 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet; thence 24 easterly along said curve 294.53 feet through a central angle of 05°57'39"; thence North 25 59°49'50" East 46.06 feet; thence South 74°24'I5" East 73.17 feet; thence South 26 87°22'34" East 66.13 feet; thence South 02°37'26" West 10.98 feet to the beginning of a 27 non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,839.00 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 00°57'28" East; thence easterly along said curve 20.04 feet 29 through a central angle of 00°24' 16"; thence North 02°37'26" East 8.02 feet to the 30 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet, to 31 which point a radial line bears South 01 °22'25" East; thence easterly along said curve PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS\22275_APN_(17-270-005 and 013_115.060-013 and 0I AL.egals\22275-8-TC£.docx Page 1 of 2 10/92012 i111.11RIT A_ PAAF �9 PS OMAS 1 278.36 feet through a central angle of 05°38'01" to a point on the easterly line of said 2 Parcel 1; thence South 41 °19'57" East 6.07 feet along said easterly line to a point thereon, 3 said paint being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius 4 of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 07°04'21" East; thence westerly 5 along said curve 20.99 feet through a central angle of 00°25'26' ; thence South 41 °21'39" 6 East 8.50 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius 7 of 2,843.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°44'59"East; thence westerly 8 along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence North 9 81 °26'22" West 68.83 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Containing 11,819 square feet. See Exhibit `HT attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances >lnay be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of 23 I �� /0•09-i2 24 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Date PA PTGOI05011SURVEYILEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 0151Legals122275-8-TCE.doex Page 2 et OP4.2012 — — FIMIRIT A_ PAAF 33 EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 1 1 ,81 9 SO.r T. 1 1 7-270-005 & 01 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003i f ---..,._ 1 E?-27a-aaq o� I �SHEET 3 SHEEN 4 a' r• &s. F R.R. - - ' SHEET 2 •R. 11rg_3aa- I 115-oho-ate , v) IADC. RCL 2 I� 027 NO 2006-0565691I0.R, RCL, 1 I JCL\" rR.S, -- 117-z�a-oa6 63 ' fb6 I -, --- N, FCL. 4 I ____ �. .. -1. rr'2 k-nTrt re rr• . .. r.1� TPOB POB 2? - S 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State III 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on COS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT - -.._w.'winsiesm.1 distances. All distances ore in fee: unless otherwise noted. (� �Irf FEET 0 100 200 4(7t; Spa PREPARED BY: PSOMA 3 Hutton Centre Drive. Ste, 200 Santos And Cos if6rnia 42707 �le1751-7373J#7t4i545-8883 tfoe) _ - DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09 t2 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS rrss U n 7 R1V i 9 t n 6.:7 1 4 FYIIIRIT A_ PAR= Ad EXHIBIT 112 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECTION 30 POR : 1.0T 3, nL OCK /3 I T .3S. , R, 6W.. . h SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO ta.1 ADD WATER COMPANY � EL SOERAN"1 E Cr t ME 9/6 1 MS 1 /@ `l POR. PCL . 2 PCL , I DOC NO, 2006- DOC, NO 2006- e 0565691 U.R, 056569i 0,R. l'� 1, o �,N TPOB `� p R.S. 63/66 _ L 1 -- �i 4-05°57'39" R,283,1 .00' L=294.53` rI mummu 284 3.00 L - 7 S 9.69 � . , PROPOSED R /W C 2 OW o ---- — � , S45°24'51"W(R) Cl N81 40 3$'W 161.21' 123.35' V EXISTING R/W N81 °40`3g"yy __ S37°58`42"WiR1 w POB v7 �22 CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE C1 C2 07°26'09" 06°04'33" 176.53' 176.53' 22,91' 18.72' L1 L2 S81°26'22"E N81°26'22"W 83.19' 68.83' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing 9 360 C > Title to State j 1 i 1 1 Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates ord bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground p 2 2 2 7 5- O TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT m distances. All distonces are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 1.00 150 PREPARED BY: S 0 M S 3 Nutted centre Oriv@, Ste, 200 Santa Ana, 123f( ornia14)54 S270,886 (??a)1Sf-7.T3;{?tai5a5F's$5s tiaxi DATE: 06-15--12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: 0E540 FA#. DISTRICT.COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO TOTAL SHEETS 8 i R I U _ 91 6 s 3 - - 2 - 4 FYNIRIT A_ PORE 1% EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT, 117-270-005 & 013 ROL, I 00C. NO. 2006- 0�65b°) 1 D � i F'OR , SECTION 39 T,39, R.641, ; RANCHO RADIAL DATA EL. SOSRANTE MD 1 /8 BEARING R,S, 63/66 " — ----_ R1 R2 R3 S00° 57'28"E 501 ° 21 '44"1E S01 °22'25"E -- N59°49'50"E `` •- - — 4 6. 06' — --- S02°35'59'"W (R `` —S74024'15,, L4 R3 ° A=05°57'39" / '"---�17, E S87 22'34 E �4 ___�_ --`66 13'_ -, R=2831.00' Q222i75 !,$ — -- L=759.69'--- v L=294.53' L3 cv _ '� A=15° 18:37" R=2843.00' �] u - f R1 R2 W = - \ PROPOSED R/W C3 c= w w a cn A=16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=581.97' "-'" N81 °40'38"W 123,15' EXISTING R/W LA `r' LINE DATA CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH L3 L4 S02°37'26"W NO2°37'26"E 10.98' 8.02' C3 C4 00°24'16" 05°38'01" 2839.00' 2831.00' 20.04' 278.36' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POE Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing 363 ti ) Title to State j I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 222 % 5 - 8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in Meet unless otherwise noted. rommim4 m FEET 0 25 50� 100 10 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drre, Ste. 200 »vto Ann, Coiif,rnio 92707 0107s,373/o.is,15.6833 (FQ. DATE: 06-15712 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAQ: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM( SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS - ti {? { ! `V i 6. 7 I J FMMIRIT A_ PAPF RR EXIIIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT. 117-270-005 & 013 M F— w w w w FOR. SECTION 30 RANCHO EL SOORANTE MS I /8 F.S. PCL, I DOC, NO, 200b 0565691 0,R, r r 38'01„ o'R�2g31 .00 69 t 7„ R_28a3. � L= __�___ pal 5° 1 8 � RCL , DOC, NO, ° 40'20" Sol°0o'26 E. t SQ�"E�R �= l ,- 3 20062. O,R, r FOR, LOT, 12-- 1 ASSESSOR'S M'1P r �. e. N O , 3 i -- �' AMB I /42- 43 •r PCL 4 _ DOC, NO, 2006- 056569 I 0, R, Sq1° 19 57 �, 6.0 ct17° 04 } , 0$1 •g7� 0, t_�5 0' 508.y©. 5`�,� (R 00° 25' 26, R�2g37.00` L�20.g9' Sal°21.39`E 8.50, 131•00' 78°58'24i F kR), ROUTE EXISTING R/W �� FREEWAY 91 RIVERSIDE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing f ) Title to State Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zane 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 22275-S TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FASEME 25 100 r 150 PREPARED BY: S 0 Q 3 Hutton Cenire Drive Ste. 20p Sonia Ana, Coiiforn o 42707 €710 -7373 i7'3j545-8&83 ifas DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 1 0-09-1 2 EA: OF540 FAA: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 Ply 9: 6.9 4 FYGIIRIT A_ PAP.F 37 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: William Von Klug, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Four Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in All or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Accessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-006, 13-007, 13-010, and 13-01 1, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002, 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Agenda Item 7 5 Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is being asked to consider the adoption of four resolutions of necessity declaring its intent to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary 'construction easement interests in all or in portions of certain real property, by eminent domain, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. (APNs) 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; and for the widening, maintenance, and operational improvements of SR-91 CIP. The immediate need for the property acquisitions is to proceed with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. The acquisitions are required for and will benefit the community by providing additional lanes to ease current traffic congestion along the SR-91 through the city of Corona in Riverside County, California. Preliminary title reports and/or litigation guarantees were obtained from Lawyers Title Insurance Company to confirm and identify the record owners of the parcels affected by the Project. The Commission then served the affected property owners with notices of the Commission's decision to appraise the property. The Commission had the properties appraised and made offers to the record owners. Negotiations were unsuccessful for the purchase of the interests necessary for the SR-91 CIP. The adoption of resolutions of necessity for the interests will not prevent negotiations from continuing. Since an agreement has not been reached with the owners of record, it may be necessary to acquire the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests described in the attachments by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is accomplished by the Commission's adoption of resolutions of necessity for the affected property. Description of Property to be Acquired 1) APN 102-020-044, the larger parcel, is owned by the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona. The property is a vacant lot located on the south side of Wardlow Road, approximately 0.25 miles east of Research Drive, in the city of Corona, California. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and • Agenda Item 7 6 temporary construction easement interests in portions of the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-006. 2) APN 102-270=010 is owned by Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., a California corporation. The site address of the property is 1805 West 6th Street, Corona, California. The property is improved with a hotel and comprises a land area of just under one acre. It is necessary to acquire the entire parcel to accommodate relocation of the 6th and Maple Streets onramp to eastbound SR-91. The legal description and map of the property to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-007. 3) APN 1 17-270-002, is owned by Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez. The property comprises a land area of approximately 30,056 square feet and is improved with a truck driving school. The site address of the property is 107 N. Joy Street, Corona, California. It is necessary to acquire the entire parcel to accommodate the realignment of Joy and Pearl Streets near the 91 /15 interchange. The legal description and map of the property to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-010. 4) APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, the larger parcel, are owned by Pearl Street Properties, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. The property comprises a land area of approximately 8.18 acres. The site address of the property is 105 and 211 Pearl Street, Corona, California. The property is improved with warehouse structures. The design of the SR-91 CIP requires the Commission to acquire a fee portion of the larger parcel, a well as a permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in the larger parcel. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are an exhibit to Resolution No. 13-01 1. Project Description The SR-91 CIP is generally described as extending the existing 91 Express Lanes into Riverside County for a distance of approximately eight miles; the addition of a general purpose lane in each direction from the 71 /91 interchange to 1-15, the improvement of five local interchanges within the city of Corona and the addition of auxiliary lanes and other operational improvements throughtout the project limits. Agenda Item 7 7 DISCUSS/ON: Hearings and Required Findings The action requested of the Commission at the conclusion of this hearing is the adoption of resolutions of necessity, authorizing the acquisition of real property interests by eminent domain. The property owners are: 1) Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona, APN 102-020-044 fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests. 2) Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., APN 102-270-010 - full acquisition in fee. 3) Santiago. Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, APN 117-270-002 - full acquisition in fee. 4) Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNs 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 - part acquisition in fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests. The properties are further identified in the legal definitions, descriptions, and • depictions attached to the respective resolution. California eminent domain law provides that a public entity may not commence with eminent domain proceedings until its governing body has adopted a resolution of necessity, which resolution may only be adopted after the governing body has given each party with an interest in the affected property, or their representatives, a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. Notices of the hearing were sent by first class mail to the property owners, and stated the Commission's intent to consider the adoption of resolutions, the right of the property owners to appear and be heard on these issues, and that failure to file a written request to appear would result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission scheduled this hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date of notice was mailed may appear and be Agenda Item 7 " h e a r d . T h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s l e g a l c o u n s e l m a i l e d t h e r e q u i r e d n o t i c e s t o t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s , o n A p r i l 2 6 , 2 0 1 3 , a n d M a y 2 4 , 2 0 1 3 , i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e , s e c t i o n 1 2 4 5 . 2 3 5 . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s w e r e a l s o i n v i t e d t o m e e t w i t h C o m m i s s i o n a n d C a ! t r a n s s t a f f t o a d d r e s s a n y c o n c e r n s t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s m a y h a v e w i t h t h e d e s i g n o f t h e p r o j e c t i n t h e m a n n e r p r o p o s e d a n d t h e n e c e s s i t y o f t h e a c q u i s i t i o n . T h e f o u r r e q u i r e d f i n d i n g s a r e a d d r e s s e d a s f o l l o w s : 1 ) P u b l i c I n t e r e s t a n d N e c e s s i t y R e q u i r e t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t T h e a c q u i s i t i o n o f t h e p r o p e r t i e s i s n e c e s s a r y t o c o n s t r u c t t h e S R - 9 1 C 1 P , w h i c h w i l l r e d u c e t r a f f i c c o n g e s t i o n a n d e n h a n c e s a f e t y , a s w e l l a s p r o v i d e a n a l t e r n a t i v e m e a n s o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a l o n g t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r a n d i n c l u d e s c o n n e c t i o n s t o 1 - 1 5 i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . T h e S R - 9 1 C I P i n c l u d e s a d d i n g g e n e r a l p u r p o s e l a n e s a n d e x t e n d i n g t o l l e d e x p r e s s l a n e s . 2 ) T h e P r o j e c t i s P l a n n e d o r L o c a t e d i n a M a n n e r t h a t w i l l b e M o s t C o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e G r e a t e s t P u b l i c G o o d a n d t h e L e a s t P r i v a t e I n j u r y A t h o r o u g h a n a l y s i s w a s c o n d u c t e d , t o f i n d t h e s i n g l e b e s t l o c a t i o n f o r t h i s p r o j e c t . E n v i r o n m e n t a l a n a l y s e s a n d f i n d i n g s i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e s e s i t e s u n i q u e l y s a t i s f y t h e e n g i n e e r i n g , p u b l i c h e a l t h , a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l i s s u e s , a n d t h e s e l o c a t i o n s a r e t h e m o s t c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e g r e a t e s t p u b l i c g o o d . T h e s e l o c a t i o n s w i l l r e s u l t i n t h e l e a s t p r i v a t e i n j u r y . 3 ) T h e P r o p e r t y S o u g h t t o b e A c q u i r e d i s N e c e s s a r y f o r t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t A s d e s c r i b e d a b o v e , a c a r e f u l a n a l y s i s w a s p e r f o r m e d r e g a r d i n g t h e s e l o c a t i o n s a n d w h a t p r o p e r t y a n d p r o p e r t y r i g h t s w e r e n e e d e d , a n d t h e s e p a r c e l s m e e t a l l t h e d e s i r e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s f o r t h e p r o j e c t . 4 ) T h e O f f e r o f J u s t C o m p e n s a t i o n h a s b e e n M a d e A p p r a i s a l s w e r e p r e p a r e d b y a p p r a i s a l f i r m s L i d g a r d a n d A s s o c i a t e s a n d K i l e y C o m p a n y , t o e s t a b l i s h t h e f a i r m a r k e t v a l u e o f t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s s e e k i n g t o a c q u i r e f r o m t h e i n t e r e s t o w n e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s i d e n t i f i e d h e r e i n . R e v i e w a p p r a i s a l s w e r e p r e p a r e d b y H e n n e s s e y & H e n n e s s e y L L C . F i x t u r e a n d E q u i p m e n t A p p r a i s a l s w e r e p r e p a r e d b y H o d g e s L a c e y & A s s o c i a t e s , L L C a n d D e s m o n d , M a r c e l l o & A m s t e r . O f f e r s o f j u s t c o m p e n s a t i o n w e r e m a d e t o t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s t o p u r c h a s e t h e p r o p e r t y A g e n d a I t e m 7 interests, based on the approved appraisals, as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the interests sought through eminent domain, to ensure the property will be available to meet the time frames associated with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. Environmental Analysis Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act has been satisfied by Ca!trans' certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) in its role as lead agency on August 8, 2012, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission's subsequent consideration of that certified EIR in its role as a responsible agency on November 14, 2012. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Notice of Public Hearing Notices of Hearing to Property Owners were mailed on April 26, 2013 to the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona; Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc.; Pearl Street Properties, LLC; and on May 24, 2013, to Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, the owners of record. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 13-006 2) Resolution No_ 13-007 3) Resolution No. 13-010 4) Resolution No. 13-01 1 10 • • Agenda Item 7 ATTACHMENT 1 • • RESOLUTION NO. 13-006 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-020-044, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-020-044, for the State Route 91 Corridor -Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and • WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California CodeofCivil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing, and temporary construction easementinterests in the property to be acquired is for the 11 SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section-4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined and described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the • • 12 " h e r e i n d e s c r i b e d r e a l p r o p e r t y a p p r o p r i a t e d t o s u c h e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e s p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 1 2 4 0 . 6 1 0 o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e . S t a f f i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o m a k e s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s t o t h e a f f e c t e d r e a l p r o p e r t y t h a t i t d e t e r m i n e s a r e r e a s o n a b l y n e c e s s a r y t o m i t i g a t e a n y a d v e r s e i m p a c t u p o n t h e e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e . S e c t i o n 7 . F u r t h e r A c t i v i t i e s . C o u n s e l f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s h e r e b y a u t h o r i z e d t o a c q u i r e t h e h e r e i n a b o v e d e s c r i b e d r e a l p r o p e r t y i n t h e n a m e o f a n d o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n b y e m i n e n t d o m a i n , a n d c o u n s e l i s a u t h o r i z e d t o i n s t i t u t e a n d p r o s e c u t e s u c h l e g a l p r o c e e d i n g s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n t h e r e w i t h . L e g a l c o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o t a k e s u c h s t e p s a s m a y b e a u t h o r i z e d a n d r e q u i r e d b y l a w , a n d t o m a k e s u c h s e c u r i t y d e p o s i t s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d b y o r d e r o f c o u r t , t o p e r m i t t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n o f a n d u s e s a i d r e a l p r o p e r t y a t t h e e a r l i e s t p o s s i b l e t i m e . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o c o r r e c t a n y e r r o r s o r t o m a k e o r a g r e e t o n o n - m a t e r i a l c h a n g e s i n t h e l e g a l d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y t h a t a r e d e e m e d n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e c o n d u c t o f t h e c o n d e m n a t i o n a c t i o n , o r o t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s o r t r a n s a c t i o n s r e q u i r e d t o a c q u i r e t h e s u b j e c t r e a l p r o p e r t y . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o r e d u c e o r m o d i f y t h e e x t e n t o f t h e i n t e r e s t s o r p r o p e r t y t o b e a c q u i r e d s o a s t o r e d u c e t h e c o m p e n s a t i o n p a y a b l e i n t h e a c t i o n w h e r e s u c h c h a n g e w o u l d n o t s u b s t a n t i a l l y i m p a i r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d o p e r a t i o n f o r t h e p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y i s b e i n g a c q u i r e d . S e c t i o n 8 . E f f e c t i v e D a t e . T h i s R e s o l u t i o n s h a l l t a k e e f f e c t u p o n a d o p t i o n . A P P R O V E D A N D A D O P T E D t h i s 1 2 t h d a y o f J u n e , 2 0 1 3 . K a r e n S . S p i e g e l , C h a i r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n A T T E S T : J e n n i f e r H a r m o n , C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n 1 3 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17136.02100\7935081.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 15 1 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2q 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `A1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 221114 Fee Acquisition APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 9; thence North 80°32'34" West 370.35 feet along the southerly line thereof to the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 9; said corner being the point of cusp with a curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 09°27'26" West; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Parcel 9 and said curve 82.05 feet through a central angle of 08°23'42" to a point thereon; thence South 80°32'34" East 33.25 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,990.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°30'39" West; thence easterly along said curve 174,22 feet through a central angle of 03°20'19"; thence South 86°49'39" Past 82.22 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Parcel 9; thence South 09°28'52" West 29.02 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 4,478 square feet. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. P.'•.2PTG0105011S11RVE` LEdit.LSj22111_.,4PN_102-020-044'Legals\22111-1_Fee.doc Page 1 of 1019/2012 @XHIInA, PACE 2 PSOMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 I combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 8 9 ]0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 st Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 _/Io -/0-/ Date P:12PTG010701\SURVEMEGA!-S122111_APN_102-020-044Legals 22111-1 _Fee doe Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIiiIt3 A, PAGE 3 " r E X H I B I T A 2 P A R C E L * T I T L E G R A N T O R A R E A A P N 2 2 1 1 1 - 1 F E E R E D E V E L O P M E N T A G E N C Y O F T H E C I T Y O F C O R O N A 4 , 4 7 8 S O F T . 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 4 4 1 0 2 7 0 2 0 - 0 4 . 9 P . M , 1 5 a / 9 2 - 9 . P A R C E L 3 , e 1 1 5 - - ` _ _ - 0 ��1 - - P R O P S E > t R / r ��0 / S E E S H E E T 2 F O R D E T A I L 6 = 4 1 � 2 4 ' 4 6 " R = 5 5 9 . 9 9 ' - ` = 4 0 4 . 7 4 ' r N 8 0 � 3 2 ' 3 4 " W 3 7 0 . 3 5 ' R O U T E 9 1 L E G E N D P O B I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g T P O B I n d i c a t e s T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g ( R ) I n d i c a t e s R a d i a l B e o r i n g C ) T i t l e t o S t a t e A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d R / S t / � , S t e , j \ 0 . ; \ E X I S T I N G R / W R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y f 0 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 9 5 \ P O B R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y C A S T A T I O N I N G 8 9 1 1 8 0 N O T E S C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e a r i n g s p r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 . D i s t a n c e s a n d s t a t i o n i n g o r e g r i d d i s t a n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 9 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t a i n g r o u n d d i s t a n c e s . A l l d i s t a n c e s o r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . 2 2 1 1 1 - 1 F E E A C O U I S I T I O N F E E T 0 3 0 6 0 1 2 0 1 8 0 P R E P A R E D B Y : P S O M A S i N e f 1 C - a Y a v _ . . o n i 1 D A T E : 0 7 - 1 7 - 2 0 1 2 R E V . : 1 0 - 0 9 ��- 2 0 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 F A # : D I S T R I C T C O U N T Y R O U T E S H E E T P M S H E E T N O . j T O T A L S H E E T S 8 R [ V 9 1 3 . 4 F E X H I B 5 A P A G E 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TI TLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-1 FEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 4,478 SOFT. WARDLOW ROAD o'L 6=08° 2 3' 4 2" R=559.99' O_ L=82.05 o') boo' ,'''. N80°32'34"W 370.35' 102-020-0. ,,EXI;STING,,RAN ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY BELOW LEFT w w C_ CC w O CO �t w w \p=03°20.19" R=2990.00'_ L=174.22 N80°32'34"W LEGEND POB Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Pont Of Beginning (R) indicates Rod'+ol Beoring ( ) Title to Stote 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) ?one 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centrc Drive Ste. 200 Santo. Ano, California 92707 tit-1w8.1-e053:i71+,S.s-CEtt.'. Wori 15`3/92-=96 PARCEL 9 PROP9SED R/W S86° 49'39nE. 370.35' 0 0 v \1 2.22 , � co N 0 rn 0 POE 102-020-045 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 22111-1 FEE ACOUISITION 60 90 FEET 0 15 30 DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10 09 2012 EA: 0E540 FAsa: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM 1?IV 91 3.4 SHEETNO. TOTAL SHE EXHIn A PAGE 5 " I 2 3 4 P S O M A S E X H I B I T ` B 1 ' L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N C a l t r a n s P a r c e l N o . 2 2 . 1 1 1 - 2 P e r m a n e n t W a l l F o o t i n g E a s e m e n t A P N 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 4 4 7 8 I n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e , S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , b e i n g a p o r t i o n o f t h e 4 9 l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s P a r c e l 9 o f t h a t c e r t a i n P a r c e l M a p f i l e d i n B o o k 1 5 8 , P a l e s 9 2 t h r o u g h 1 0 9 6 o f P a r c e l M a p s , R e c o r d s o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , d e s c r i b e d a s f o l l o w s : 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 B e g i n n i n g a t t h e s o u t h e a s t e r l y c o r n e r o f s a i d P a r c e l 9 ; t h e n c e N o r t h 0 9 � 2 8 ' 5 2 E a s t 2 9 . 0 2 f e e t a l o n g t h e e a s t e r l y l i n e t h e r e o f t o a p o i n t t h e r e o n , s a i d p o i n t b e i n g t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g ; t h e n c e N o r t h 8 6 � 4 9 ' 3 9 " W e s t 8 2 . 2 2 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e w e s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 1 7 4 . 2 2 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 3 � 2 0 ' 1 9 " ; t h e n c e N o r t h 8 0 � 3 2 ' 3 4 " W e s t 3 3 . 2 5 f e e t t o a p o i n t o n t h e n o r t h e r l y l i n e o f s a i d P a r c e l 9 , s a i d p o i n t b e i n g t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 5 5 9 . 9 9 f e e t , t o w h i c h p o i n t a r a d i a l l i n e b e a r s S o u t h 0 1 � 0 3 ' 4 5 " W e s t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d n o r t h e r l y l i n e a n d s a i d c u r v e 3 4 . 2 4 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 3 � 3 0 ' 1 2 " t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 , 9 8 4 . 0 0 f e e t , t o w h i c h p o i n t a r a d i a l l i n e b e a r s S o u t h 0 6 ' 2 9 ' 4 7 " W e s t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 1 7 3 . 1 1 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 3 � 1 9 ' 2 6 " ; t h e n c e S o u t h 8 6 � 4 9 ' 3 9 " E a s t 8 2 . 8 8 f e e t t o a p o i n t o n s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e ; t h e n c e S o u t h 0 9 � 2 8 ' 5 2 " W e s t 6 . 0 4 f e e t a l o n g s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e t o t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g . C o n t a i n i n g 1 , 6 3 2 s q u a r e f e e t . S e e E x h i b i t ` B 2 ' a t t a c h e d h e r e t o a n d m a d e a p a r t h e r e o f . P : ` " 2 P T 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 1 S U R V E Y I L E G A L S ' , 2 2 1 I : _ A P N _ 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 4 4 1 . e g a L ' . 2 2 1 1 1 ` _ P E . d o c P a g e 1 o f 1 0 / 9 / 2 0 1 2 E X H I E 1 ' 5 1 , P A G E 6 PS OMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of t983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of 11 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 fD--/Q-/2 Date P.UPTGO10501EURVEY\LGGA Si2211 i APA! 102.020-044;I.eaatse221 f ;-2 13E.doc 10, 9/2012 _ _ _ _ Poge 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 " " P A R C E L # T I T L E E X H I B I T B 2 G R A N T O R A R E A A P N 2 2 1 1 1 - 2 E S M T R E D E V E L O P M E N T A G E N C Y O F T H E C I T Y O F C O R O N A 1 , 6 3 2 S O F T . 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 4 4 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 4 9 R , M , 1 5 0 / 9 2 - 9 6 y 4 / , - - " , J 0 = 4 1 � 2 4 ' 4 0 " R = 5 5 9 . 9 9 ' P R O P o s E o R i w i i i e n - s s a t - s t e n - N 8 0 � 3 2 ' 3 4 " W 3 7 0 . 3 5 ' S E E S H E E T 2 F O R D E T A I L R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y o S / / \ q . F O P . A e 0 O Q N t r ) c o ( V a ) 0 v ) - , . 7 0 4 0 . 4 1 4 1 - L E G E N D P O B I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g T P 0 8 I n d i c a t e s T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g ( R ) I n d i c a t e s R a d i a l B e a r i n g ( ) T i t l e t o S t a t e A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d E X I S T I N G R W 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 4 5 P O B R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y C / L S T A T I O N I N G 8 9 1 8 0 N O T E S C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e a r i n g s a r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 . D i s t a n c e s a n d s t o t i o n i n g a r e g r i d d i s t a n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 9 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t a i n g r o u n d d i s t a n c e s . A l l d i s t a n c e s o r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . 2 2 1 1 1 - 2 P E R M A N E N T W A L L F O O T I N G E A S E M E N T 1 - - - - - - ��- r = i m m u m m o m m o m m i F E E T 0 " 3 0 6 0 1 2 0 1 8 0 P R E P A R E D B Y : P S O M A S J H o 1 1 0 n C e r t r l e p r e e S + a , 2 0 0 ; q n 1 �� a n o . C o l + f o r n : o 6 1 d N q O S 7 : 1 7 1 _ j 5 / 5 - 2 e 9 3 ' , ' 9 t D A T E : 0 7 - 1 7 - 2 0 1 2 R E V . : 1 0 - 0 9 - 2 0 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 , . F A u : D I S T R I C T - C O U N T Y 8 R 1 V R O U T E S H E E T P M 9 1 3 . 4 S H E E T N O . ��T O T A L S H E E T S 2 C H M T ��/ 1 j , P A G E 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# 22111-2 _ val--.14se GRANTOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA WARDLOW JROAD__ -- A=03° 30' 1 2 R=559.99' L=34.24' ABOVE RIGHT W W t!] 501°013.'45"MR)/ N80° 32 `34"W 33.25' 502° 26"28"E (R ) (R=559.99') 'S06°29'217 W(R)" (R=2.984.00') *ors' ,A=03°1 �9'26" R=2984.00 x 6=03°20'19" R=2990.00' L-174.22 _r +peg s.- em,-Eaet--mm \S06.° 30,'.39" q1R) 102-020 044 EXISTING R/W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROP P_V, 1J,3/92-96 PARCEL 6=03°19�26"—586°4.9�39"E 82,88' ._._. R-2984.00' L=173 11 � �..4 ... N86°�49'39 .'W 82.22" PROPOSED R/W A=03 20' 1 9" R=2990.00' L=1 74.22' e-1W1a-460s-scs--temAMEN- 15HT eM,_3609-411M-19021-arse-501‘1t-mae- LEGEND POB Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing. ( } Title to State t i i Access Prohibited (V- tn 00O 0,6 o v CR— O N 6.04' POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY b.) 0 F` EL NOTES Coordinotes and beorings ore on CCS 198312007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing ore grid.distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PSOMAS Ite.e L." ien-re 3r,ve. Sit. 200. Sant.; Ana, CuGtoen:o 927c; 22111-2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT F.=._. -7 FEET 0 15 30 60 9U DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.:10-09-2012 EA: OF540 COUNTY 8 Riv 1 91 3.4 FAtt: TOTAL SHEE EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 24 " " " 1 2 5 6 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 P S O A S E X H I B I T T V L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N C a ! t r a n s P a r c e l N o . 2 2 1 1 1 - 3 T e m p o r a r y C o n s t r u c t i o n E a s e m e n t A P N 1 0 2 - 0 2 0 - 0 4 4 I n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e , S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , b e i n g a p o r t i o n o f t h e l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s P a r c e l 9 o f t h a t c e r t a i n P a r c e l M a p f i l e d i n B o o k 1 5 8 , P a g e s 9 2 t h r o u g h 9 6 o f P a r c e l M a p s , R e c o r d s o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , d e s c r i b e d a s f o l l o w s : B e g i n n i n g a t t h e s o u t h e a s t e r l y c o r n e r o f s a i d P a r c e l 9 ; t h e n c e N o r t h 0 9 � 2 8 ' 5 2 " E a s t 3 5 . 0 6 f e e t a l o n g t h e e a s t e r l y l i n e t h e r e o f t o a p o i n t t h e r e o n , s a i d p o i n t b e i n g t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g ; t h e n c e N o r t h 8 6 � 4 9 ' 3 9 " W e s t 8 2 . 8 8 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 , 9 8 4 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e w e s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 1 7 3 . 1 1 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 3 � 1 9 ' 2 6 " t o a p o i n t o n t h e n o r t h e r l y l i n e o f s a i d P a r c e l 9 , s a i d p o i n t b e i n g t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 5 5 9 . 9 9 f e e t , t o w h i c h p o i n t a r a d i a l l i n e b e a r s S o u t h 0 2 ' 2 6 ' 2 8 " E a s t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d n o r t h e r l y l i n e a n d s a i d c u r v e 1 1 6 . 1 3 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 1 1 � 5 2 ' 5 4 " ; t h e n c e S o u t h 1 5 � 1 1 ' 5 6 " E a s t 2 6 . 1 3 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 , 9 8 1 . 0 0 f e e t , t o w h i c h p o i n t a r a d i a l l i n e b e a r s S o u t h 0 4 � 0 9 ' 2 4 " W e s t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 5 1 . 2 1 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 0 � 5 9 ' 0 4 ' ; t h e n c e S o u t h 8 6 � 4 9 ' 3 9 " E a s t 8 3 . 2 1 f e e t t o a p o i n t o n s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e ; t h e n c e S o u t h 0 9 � 2 8 ' 5 2 " W e s t 3 . 0 2 f e e t a l o n g s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e t o t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g . C o n t a i n i n g 1 , 9 0 7 s q u a r e f e e t . S e e E x h i b i t ` C 2 ' a t t a c h e d h e r e t o a n d m a d e a p a r t h e r e o f . P : 1 2 P T 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 4 S t 1 R V E Y \ L E G A L S \ 2 2 1 1 i _ A . P N _ 1 0 2 - 0 2 f i - 0 4 4 \ L e g a l s \ 2 2 1 I - 3 T C E . d o c P a g e I o f 1 0 1 9 , 2 0 1 2 E X H I B I T 2 A �� P A G E 1 0 SOMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are lased on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 3 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described: The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0,99997476. 7 Prepared under the direction of 9 10 11 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 12 13 14 15 16. 17 18 19 20 21 22 93 24 25 26 27 ?8 29 30 31 P:12PT00i0SO'IS {JRVEYILEOALS12211t_,APN i02-020-04411.t ais122?I1-3 YCi?_dot Paw 2of2 10t9t2012 EXHIBIT,(16PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR ARE A APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA ;907 SOFT. 102-020-044 Q\ .tea �o 102-020-049 P , M, 15.3/92-96 PARDE- I 3 PROPOSED R / SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL • 3/ ' \\yP, . ' A=41 °24'46" R=559.99' --1=404.74' 102 020-045 $6. 1� c >•n, 15a/92- .6 'F PARCEL 9 N l ess-45015-19-imer-wieRt-rers-seds-rieek-"-- eon N80° 32'34"W 370.35 EXISTING R/W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB TPOB (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True Point Of Beginning fndicotes Radio! Bearing Title to State Access Prohibited 1 POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING 8 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances: Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22111-3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 120 180 FEET 0 30 60 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S 3 ter. r.•.tr9 Gr ive, Ste., MO Sen+� sno, rott(ornio 92707 .i+s t4f+-8C53/1714154S' mi. if nr} DATE: 07-17-2012 REv.: 10-09-2012 EA: 01-540 FAu: DISTRICT COUNTY RT�r EXHIBIT A PAGE 12 ROUTE .' 91 SHEET PM 3.4 SHEET NO. 1 TOTAL SHEETS 2 27 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,907 SO.FT. 102-020-04 — WARDLOW F- _ CD 0 O m a w (!7 S02°26'28"E(R) (R=559.991 S1 5° 1 1 '56"E 26.1 3' 3, �.— ��6• gg' _ 22"�-° A„ ��SS9' s\A°19' ����°52 5° 0-03 19'26" R=2984.00' L-1 73-1 ...--, u_ J w CO w w to gi 1 `--- -ezmt- — —•-- 506629'47 W(R) (R=2984.00') ROAD �'+�. .seumr-for,-f=n-tit ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE rom-e.mt-effe--ftee-eme,-eame- attes `EXISTING R/W FREEWAY i ....,:_ . � R_2984.00" st-ess-elus" SO4°09'24"W(R) P , M , PARCEL 586° N86' J 58/ 92— 6 9 49' 39"E 83.21 gg`39"�N 82.88 PROPOSED R/W ---. inO Np o� , va �. a - 3.02 ` 4 TPOB -t 0 • u,� M 1.0 0� L...t in 0 a o 6.=00° 59'04,. R=2981 L.51 w..: fl3° i 9"26' L-i 73.11' -spa"testr-atem-riew-rew .00• 21' .,. r -,r..-- ear _" sers-awa-rier-max ROUTE aaommrvrainst+ss•ar-- 91 RIVERSIDE POB FREEWAY LEGEND POB TPOB (R) indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True Point Of Beginning Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State Access Prohibited ( } I 11 NOTES FEET 2 2 1.1 1 - 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCT ION EASEMENT Coordinotes and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. AIt distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. "rimmo * 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: (DATE: PSOMAS 3 401,00 Centre Rr;v±, Ste_ 700 Son tc Ana. Calif orn:o g2707 Litt 15;-.ECS ;t7}•,sn Peas rto> 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: 0E540 FAtt:4 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM - SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ MI/ 91 3.4 2 - 7 EXHIBIT A PAGE 13 28 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 13-007 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-270-010, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire a fee interest in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-270-010, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 29 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee interest in the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal description and the map of the property of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined and described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said • • 30 " " e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e . C o u n s e l f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s a u t h o r i z e d t o a c q u i r e t h e h e r e i n d e s c r i b e d r e a l p r o p e r t y a p p r o p r i a t e d t o s u c h e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e s p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 1 2 4 0 . 6 1 0 o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e . S t a f f i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o m a k e s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s t o t h e a f f e c t e d r e a l p r o p e r t y t h a t i t d e t e r m i n e s a r e r e a s o n a b l y n e c e s s a r y t o m i t i g a t e a n y a d v e r s e i m p a c t u p o n t h e e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e . S e c t i o n 7 . F u r t h e r A c t i v i t i e s . C o u n s e l f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s h e r e b y a u t h o r i z e d t o a c q u i r e t h e h e r e i n a b o v e d e s c r i b e d r e a l p r o p e r t y i n t h e n a m e o f a n d o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n b y e m i n e n t d o m a i n , a n d c o u n s e l i s a u t h o r i z e d t o i n s t i t u t e a n d p r o s e c u t e s u c h l e g a l p r o c e e d i n g s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n t h e r e w i t h . L e g a l c o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o t a k e s u c h s t e p s a s m a y b e a u t h o r i z e d a n d r e q u i r e d b y l a w , a n d t o m a k e s u c h s e c u r i t y d e p o s i t s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d b y o r d e r o f c o u r t , t o p e r m i t t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n o f a n d u s e s a i d r e a l p r o p e r t y a t t h e e a r l i e s t p o s s i b l e t i m e . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o c o r r e c t a n y e r r o r s o r t o m a k e o r a g r e e t o n o n - m a t e r i a l c h a n g e s i n t h e l e g a l d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y t h a t a r e d e e m e d n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e c o n d u c t o f t h e c o n d e m n a t i o n a c t i o n , o r o t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s o r t r a n s a c t i o n s r e q u i r e d t o a c q u i r e t h e s u b j e c t r e a l p r o p e r t y . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o r e d u c e o r m o d i f y t h e e x t e n t o f t h e i n t e r e s t s o r p r o p e r t y t o b e a c q u i r e d s o a s t o r e d u c e t h e c o m p e n s a t i o n p a y a b l e i n t h e a c t i o n w h e r e s u c h c h a n g e w o u l d n o t s u b s t a n t i a l l y i m p a i r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d o p e r a t i o n f o r t h e p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y i s b e i n g a c q u i r e d . S e c t i o n 8 . E f f e c t i v e D a t e . T h i s R e s o l u t i o n s h a l l t a k e e f f e c t u p o n a d o p t i o n . A P P R O V E D A N D A D O P T E D t h i s 1 2 t h d a y o f J u n e , 2 0 1 3 . K a r e n S . S p i e g e l , C h a i r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n A T T E S T : J e n n i f e r H a r m o n , C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n 3 1 File No: 12002670 FEE EXHIBIT "A All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 3 of Trinidad Yorba Tract, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 2 p 22 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to W.I. Hollingsworth by deed from the State of California, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995 of Official Records; thence along the Easterly boundary of said parcel North 9° 25' 50" East 237.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through an angle of 109° 46' 50" a distance of 47.90 feet to Course "A"; thence along Course "A" North 81° 08' 21" East 355.94 feet to the Easterly terminus of that certain curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 343.00 feet in the Southeasterly line of that portion of land condemned by the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records; said point also being on the Westerly boundary of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Ray N. Woods, et ux, by deed recorded May 12, 1961 as Instrument No. 40636, of Official Records; thence Southwesterly along said curve from a tangent bearing of South 78° 51' 44" West through an angle of 69° 25' 54" a distance of 415.65 feet; thence South 9° 25' 50" West parallel with said Easterly boundary 51.48 feet; thence North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That portion of the North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street which would ordinarily pass with a conveyance of Parcel 1 described above, as vacated by Resolution No. 82-115 of the City Council of the City of Corona, recorded January 28, 1983 as Instrument No. 18074, of Official Records, Riverside County records, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the land described in the Director's Deed to W.I. Hollingsworth, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the tangent portion of the Easterly line of Exhibit Q, Page I 33 File No: 12002670 said land of Hollingsworth, South 9° 25' 50" West 44.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 13.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" an arch distance of 20.42 feet to the Southerly line of said North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street; thence along said Southerly line South 80° 34' 10" East to the Southerly prolongation of that certain course having a bearing and length of "South 9° 25' 50" West 51.46 feet" in the Southeasterly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the last mentioned prolongation North 9° 25' 50" East 57.00 feet to said Northerly line of the North 57.00 feet of the West Sixth Street; thence along said West Sixth Street North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 102-270-010 Exhibit A, Page 2 34 " A S S E S S O R ' S 4 1 . 4 P 8 N 1 0 8 P G < 7 R I V E R S I O E C O L N T Y , C . 4 " " P O R r 3 s R 7 W . R O L 4 S i e R R A Y ' O R 8 4 . 1 s t A E 9 1 t o e ( . 6 3 t u b i p c s r - - s u e - _ _ & f a 2 / 2 2 T r i r d d l d K r . r . t v n f a C Y I P M ) 1 7 / 4 t 1 2 - 1 0 1 A l y c e l i t o " / 9 3 9 4 4 c k 1 - / 0 . 7 0 ; ! . . 9 ; ' Y j y y " 1 s , a . r " " " , " E x h i b i t A , P a g e 3 3 5 ATTACHMENT 3 • • RESOLUTION NO. 13-010 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 117-270-002, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire a fee interest in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-270-002, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CUD") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee interest in the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. 36 Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal description and the map of the property of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined and described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to 'easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the =public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property 37 " t h a t i t d e t e r m i n e s a r e r e a s o n a b l y n e c e s s a r y t o m i t i g a t e a n y a d v e r s e i m p a c t u p o n t h e e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e . S e c t i o n 7 . F u r t h e r A c t i v i t i e s . C o u n s e l f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s h e r e b y a u t h o r i z e d t o a c q u i r e t h e h e r e i n a b o v e d e s c r i b e d r e a l p r o p e r t y i n t h e n a m e o f a n d o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n b y e m i n e n t d o m a i n , a n d c o u n s e l i s a u t h o r i z e d t o i n s t i t u t e a n d p r o s e c u t e s u c h l e g a l p r o c e e d i n g s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n t h e r e w i t h . L e g a l c o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o t a k e s u c h s t e p s a s m a y b e a u t h o r i z e d a n d r e q u i r e d b y l a w , a n d t o m a k e s u c h s e c u r i t y d e p o s i t s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d b y o r d e r o f c o u r t , t o p e r m i t t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n o f a n d u s e s a i d r e a l p r o p e r t y a t t h e e a r l i e s t p o s s i b l e t i m e . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o c o r r e c t a n y e r r o r s o r t o m a k e o r a g r e e t o n o n - m a t e r i a l c h a n g e s i n t h e l e g a l d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y t h a t a r e d e e m e d n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e c o n d u c t o f t h e c o n d e m n a t i o n a c t i o n , o r o t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s o r t r a n s a c t i o n s r e q u i r e d t o a c q u i r e t h e s u b j e c t r e a l p r o p e r t y . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o r e d u c e o r m o d i f y t h e e x t e n t o f t h e i n t e r e s t s o r p r o p e r t y t o b e a c q u i r e d s o a s t o r e d u c e t h e c o m p e n s a t i o n p a y a b l e i n t h e a c t i o n w h e r e s u c h c h a n g e w o u l d n o t s u b s t a n t i a l l y i m p a i r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d o p e r a t i o n f o r t h e p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y i s b e i n g a c q u i r e d . S e c t i o n 8 . E f f e c t i v e D a t e . T h i s R e s o l u t i o n s h a l l t a k e e f f e c t u p o n a d o p t i o n . A P P R O V E D A N D A D O P T E D t h i s 1 2 t h d a y o f J u n e , 2 0 1 3 . K a r e n S . S p i e g e l , C h a i r : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n A T T E S T : J e n n i f e r H a r m o n , C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n 3 8 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Those portions of Lots 37, 39 and 40 and all of Lot 38 of Block "B" of Lands of the South Riverside. Land and Water Company, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as said lots and block are shown on map on file in Book 9 page(s) 6 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, California, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard, 100 feet wide, with the Westerly line of Pearl Street, 60 feet wide, said point also being the Southeasterly corner of that certain 1.97 acres parcel of land described in deed to State of California recorded July 2, 1959 in Book 2502 page(s) 338 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; Thence along the boundary line of said 1.97 acre parcel the following courses: North 8° 13' 53" East (bearing assumed for purpose of this description) along said Westerly line, also being the Easterly line of said Block "B" 441.03 feet; Thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears South 8° 13' 53" West, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet through a central angle of 100° 08' 07" a distance of 43.69 feet; Thence North 71° 36' 00" West tangent to the proceeding curve 130.72 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 40, last said point being the true point of beginning for the parcel herein described; Thence Westerly along the arc of a curve tangent to the proceeding course, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1030.00 feet through a central angle of 7° 01' 15", a distance of 126.21 feet; Thence Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears North 73° 39' 15" West, concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 35.00 feet through a central angle of 86° 46' 02" a distance of 53.00 feet to a point in the Westerly line of said Lot 39, last said Westerly line also being the Easterly line of Joy Street, 60 feet wide; Thence North 1° 06' 47" East, leaving the boundary line of said 1.97 acre parcel along the Westerly line of said Lots 37, 38 and 39 a distance of 144.42 feet; Thence South 74° 19' 02" East 159.63 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 37; Thence South 8° 06' 47" West along the Easterly line of said Lots 37, 38, 39 and 40, a distance of 173.05 feet to the true point of beginning. APN: 117-270-002 Exhibit A, Page 1 40 " P O R . C / T Y O F C O R O N A F O R . S E C . 3 0 , T . 3 S . R . 6 W , B P O T ? S O U T H R / K L A N D A N D W A T E R C O . ) S � C r i d , W . L / N � S O 4 M . R . . O d ( ( Y f& 1 7 4 , 1 3 . \ ` r l . . / 1 7 5 4 . 4 c . 1 o " o r c A c ��" " R I V E R r r F R W A Y R r 9 / f ? 1 _ , f L o t 3 . ��` Y \ / , i f b ! B / k . 7 3 1 \ < \ a , \ , . . . c r O 3 r s s [ i T 2 - } a - i o i N d P e r . P r r . / t �� M '% n �� I . / s I f 7 . 4 " D A T A N W Y M A . E S M A W R S , 0 / 2 / O S W S Y A S S E S S O R S M A P B K . / / 7 P G . 2 7 R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y , C A L I F R s l r e o S S E 8 1 2 - 5 5 - / 0 8 - 4 / / , u e m s ' N / R O N L Y 5 . S / Y . C . L d / 4 T . R . A . 4 / 8 M . B . 9 / 6 , 8 S . B . S o u t h R i v e r s / d e L a n d B W a t e r C a . A . M . B . / / 4 2 - 4 3 A s s e s s o r ' s M o p N a . 3 / P . M . 2 3 / 7 0 S E P T . / 9 7 4 " / / 7 - 2 7 s - z s / " . Z O O ' A l l N Q N E W N O . R s a r . v 1 7 9 7 G R f - M Y M S / o ��" e N " 7 8 7 4 f i " r y / , k / 7 A s / " l . . r n " / - s A f e " r . o r f / q / 7 . / s r j l l l i L i f t S S C I O / / 7 , / S 7 0 2 4 f&/ 8 5 . 4 2 4 - S h f 2 5 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. 13-011 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT, PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, AND 117-270-013, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: 43 Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some m- all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. • 44 " " " S e c t i o n 6 . M o r e N e c e s s a r y P u b l i c U s e . S o m e o r a l l o f t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y a f f e c t e d b y t h e i n t e r e s t t o b e a c q u i r e d i s s u b j e c t t o e a s e m e n t s a n d r i g h t s o f w a y a p p r o p r i a t e d t o e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e s . T o t h e e x t e n t t h a t t h e h e r e i n d e s c r i b e d u s e o r u s e s w i l l u n r e a s o n a b l y i n t e r f e r e w i t h o r i m p a i r t h e c o n t i n u a n c e o f t h e p u b l i c u s e a s i t n o w e x i s t s o r m a y r e a s o n a b l y b e e x p e c t e d t o e x i s t i n t h e f u t u r e , t h e C o m m i s s i o n f i n d s a n d d e t e r m i n e s t h a t t h e h e r e i n d e s c r i b e d u s e o r u s e s a r e m o r e n e c e s s a r y t h a n s a i d e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e . C o u n s e l f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s a u t h o r i z e d t o a c q u i r e t h e h e r e i n d e s c r i b e d r e a l p r o p e r t y a p p r o p r i a t e d t o s u c h e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e s p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 1 2 4 0 . 6 1 0 o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e . S t a f f i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o m a k e s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s t o t h e a f f e c t e d r e a l p r o p e r t y t h a t i t d e t e r m i n e s a r e r e a s o n a b l y n e c e s s a r y t o m i t i g a t e a n y a d v e r s e i m p a c t u p o n t h e e x i s t i n g p u b l i c u s e . S e c t i o n 7 . F u r t h e r A c t i v i t i e s . C o u n s e l f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s h e r e b y a u t h o r i z e d t o a c q u i r e t h e h e r e i n a b o v e d e s c r i b e d r e a l p r o p e r t y i n t h e n a m e o f a n d o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n b y e m i n e n t d o m a i n , a n d c o u n s e l i s a u t h o r i z e d t o i n s t i t u t e a n d p r o s e c u t e s u c h l e g a l p r o c e e d i n g s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n t h e r e w i t h . L e g a l c o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o t a k e s u c h s t e p s a s m a y b e a u t h o r i z e d a n d r e q u i r e d b y l a w , a n d t o m a k e s u c h s e c u r i t y d e p o s i t s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d b y o r d e r o f c o u r t , t o p e r m i t t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n o f a n d u s e s a i d r e a l p r o p e r t y a t t h e e a r l i e s t p o s s i b l e t i m e . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o c o r r e c t a n y e r r o r s o r t o m a k e o r a g r e e t o n o n - m a t e r i a l c h a n g e s i n t h e l e g a l d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y t h a t a r e d e e m e d n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e c o n d u c t o f t h e c o n d e m n a t i o n a c t i o n , o r o t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s o r t r a n s a c t i o n s r e q u i r e d t o a c q u i r e t h e s u b j e c t r e a l p r o p e r t y . C o u n s e l i s f u r t h e r a u t h o r i z e d t o r e d u c e o r m o d i f y t h e e x t e n t o f t h e i n t e r e s t s o r p r o p e r t y t o b e a c q u i r e d s o a s t o r e d u c e t h e c o m p e n s a t i o n p a y a b l e i n t h e a c t i o n w h e r e s u c h c h a n g e w o u l d n o t s u b s t a n t i a l l y i m p a i r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d o p e r a t i o n f o r t h e p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y i s b e i n g a c q u i r e d . S e c t i o n 8 . E f f e c t i v e D a t e . T h i s R e s o l u t i o n s h a l l t a k e e f f e c t u p o n a d o p t i o n . A P P R O V E D A N D A D O P T E D t h i s 1 2 t h d a y o f J u n e , 2 0 1 3 . K a r e n S . S p i e g e l , C h a i r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n A T T E S T : J e n n i f e r H a r m o n , C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n 4 5 Le_gai Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Access Easement" refers to an non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement and right of way in favor of ROTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction site, as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent of RCTC. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 47 after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and petpetual easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to, reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove; at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limited to sewers, water, electrical systems and communication systems, consisting wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholds, and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in, under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by ROTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 17336.0210 t7a ur; • EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 48 " P S O A S ! 2 E X H I B I T ` A l ' L E G A L D E S C R w r i o N 3 4 C a l t r a n s P a r c e l N o . 2 2 2 7 5 - 1 5 F e e A c q u i s i t i o n 6 A P N 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 7 7 8 I n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e , S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , b e i n g a p o r t i o n o f t h e 9 l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s P a r c e l 2 i n t h e Q u i t c l a i m D e e d r e c o r d e d A u g u s t 2 , 2 0 0 6 a s D o c u m e n t t o N o . 2 0 0 6 - 0 5 6 5 6 9 1 o f O f f i c i a l R e c o r d s o f s a i d C o u n t y , d e s c r i b e d a s f o l l o w s : 1 1 1 2 B e g i n n i n g a t t h e s o u t h e a s t e r l y c o r e r o f s a i d P a r c e l 2 ; t h e n c e N o r t h 8 1 � 4 0 ' 3 8 " W e s t 1 3 2 1 2 . 1 4 f e e t a l o n g t h e g e n e r a l s o u t h e r l y l i n e o f s a i d P a r c e l 2 t o a p o i n t o n t h e w e s t e r l y l i n e 1 4 o f t h e l a n d d e s c r i b e d i n t h e F i n a l O r d e r o f C o n d e m n a t i o n e n t e r e d S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 1 9 1 5 , i n 1 5 C a s e N o . 6 8 8 9 , S u p e r i o r C o u r t o f s a i d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , a C e r t i f i e d C o p y t h e r e o f b e i n g 1 6 r e c o r d e d O c t o b e r 4 , 1 9 1 5 i n B o o k 4 2 7 , P a g e 2 8 2 o f D e e d s , R e c o r d s o f s a i d C o u n t y , s a i d 1 7 p o i n t b e i n g t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g ; t h e n c e N o r t h 8 1 � 4 0 ' 3 8 " W e s t 1 9 . 6 5 f e e t 1 8 c o n t i n u i n g a l o n g s a i d g e n e r a l s o u t h e r l y l i n e t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e 1 9 n o r t h e a s t e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 5 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e n o r t h w e s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e a n d 2 0 s a i d g e n e r a l s o u t h e r l y l i n e 1 5 . 8 7 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 3 6 � 2 1 ' 5 6 " ; t h e n c e S o u t h 2 1 8 1 � 2 6 ' 2 2 " E a s t 2 9 . 3 8 f e e t t o a p o i n t o n s a i d w e s t e r l y l i n e , s a i d p o i n t b e i n g t h e b e g i n n i n g 2 2 o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e a s t e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 0 6 . 5 3 f e e t , t o w h i c h 2 3 p o i n t a r a d i a l l i n e b e a r s S o u t h 5 2 � 1 7 ' 0 5 " W e s t ; t h e n c e s o u t h e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e a n d 2 4 s a i d w e s t e r l y l i n e 6 . 9 6 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e . o f 0 1 � 5 5 ' 5 2 " t o t h e T r u e P o i n t o f 2 5 B e g i n n i n g . 2 6 2 7 2 8 C o n t a i n i n g 1 3 0 s q u a r e f e e t 2 9 3 0 3 1 S e e E x h i b i t ` A 2 ' a t t a c h e d h e r e t o a n d m a d e a p a r t h e r e o f . P A 2 P T G 0 1 6 5 0 1 1 S U R V E Y \ L E G A L S 1 2 2 2 7 5 , A P N i 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 7 1 L e g a l s 1 2 2 2 7 5 - 1 - F e e . d o c x P a g e ! o f 2 1 0 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 E X H I B I T A , P A G E 3 4 9 P OMAS 2 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 3 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to 4 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 5 6 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 7 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 8 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 9 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 10 II 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 15 16 ram•► la-/7-/2 17 a Date 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN 117-270-007\Lega1s122275-1-Fee.doex page 2 of 2 10117/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 50 EXHIBIT A2 PARCELtt TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP, 130 SO. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 t 17-2 °-004 oo '- A. T„&S.F. R, ,q, 1 9`300-421 "�-- 1115-{360-0161 .. 1 te) a _ — — �I 000. NO, 2006-0565691 O.R. vc PO .. 21 PCL. 1 Poi Q 117-270-006 E R, _ _- ._ I S NB t ' 40'19' yy— 212.14 1 © I Poi "2;r22r7n4 S1 T P O B 1 365 L SHEET 2 J 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CiL STA'HONING IA LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radio, Bearing ( ) Title to State i i i i i Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on GCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6,Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide cy 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 7 r FEE ACOUISIT{ON distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 140 240 400 600 PREPARED er: 3 dui fan crw re Orive Sec, 200 r��.-,ij15'-'3711(,et iit5i5-a ®3 (ccvl DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FAit: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM 'SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS $ - R IV 91 6.9 i 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 51 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN FEE PEARL STREET PROP 130 50.FT. 1p22275-1 117-270--007 ink !R ' SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND WATER R COMPANY 30 M9 9/6 I, LRl tu . 0 a2' Al CC r� Srt vl PCI 2 ! ,, DOC , NO. 2006�- 0 565691 U . R . V.! b ? CL ~ ( M l O O° 1 1 Z r3r..1j 0 a� p06' 4- 9°S1'1q. R=25,00, � Lg ,. _ L� g C .-3 g . 21 , .�,- -- .._ -� O� 6,, `; - -_ 14° 1 26'22"r -- CJ 4=36021 ,56,, --`'` :F,< g ..,11ar t Fe= 6S5' 2 , L-R1 5.00' 19.65' 5.87, N81 °40.38„ w 1'`6.96 Nei• °40'3g„w (2r % 1 rPOQ 212.14' PRopase, RfW LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of .Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial ®paring ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( }Title to State j I I I i Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 i -1 FEE ACOWSITION ground ,0. distances. All distances ore in Feet unless otherwise noted. KIT 0 1O` 0 60 PREPARED BY: 1 Hutton Centre Drive,t Ste. 200 - iuna Arno, Ceti fpr,io WO f11405s-73111171415A5-8863 frox) DATE:6-1512 REV,: 10--17-12 £A:0E540 FM*: DISTRICT 'COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 FM 91 6.9 2 - 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 52 PJ OMAS 1 EXHIBIT `BI' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-2 5 Fee Acquisition 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 . recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28"; thence South 81'2622" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41 °20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve 25 165.85 feet through a central angle of 03°20'58"; thence North 02°32'29" East 95.94 feet 26 to a point on the general northerly line of said Parcel 4, said point being the beginning of 27 a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 13° 11'22" West; thence easterly along said northerly line the 29 following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 30 00°45'34" and 2) South 77'34'12" East 140.88 feet to the northeasterly comer of said 31 Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 73.97 feet along the general easterly line of said P:12PTG0105011SURVEMECALst22275_APN_I17-270-005 and013_115-060-013 and 0151Legalga.2275-2-FEE.docx Page 1 of3 I0/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 53 PS OMAS Parcel 4 to the southeasterly comer thereof and the beginning of a non -tangent curve 2 concave northwesterly having a radius of 1,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 3 South 18'23'16" East; thence westerly along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4 4 and along said curve 199.21 feet through a central angle of 05°51'11" to the most 5 southerly comer thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; 6 thence South 41 ° 19'57" East 15.92 feet along said northeasterly line to the most easterly 7 corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78°58'24" 8 West 131.00 feet to the most easterly corner of said Parcel 1, said point being the 9 beginning of anon -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to to which point a radial line bears South 08°20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly 1 line of said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses: t) along said curve 581.97 feet 12 through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40'38" West 123.15 feet to the I3 Point of Beginning. 14 15 Containing 51,953 square feet 16 17 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 18 and relinquishes to the tirantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 19 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 20 21 See Exhibit `B2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 25 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG01050PSURVE't\LEGALS122275 APN I t 1-270-005 and 013 115-06O-0I3 and 0150Legalst22275 2•FEE.doex Page 2 of 3 )0/9nO12 _ EXHIBIT A,. PAGE B 54 PS MAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 4 5 6 Brian E. Bullock, PiS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 0 31 /D - DY-/Z Date P vpTG0105O11SURVEVALEGAt.5122275 APN 1 t7 270-005 and 013 115-060-0J13 and Ot51Legat<_122275-2-FEE.dacx Page 3 of 10/9/2032 — ` EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 55 EXIHBIT 2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 11117-270-010 —23 & 13 0-005 & 1 �� 2 00.1 2 SHEET • r•�s.F, ( NO. 2006-05656911 ( I fi,g, 63/66 �- rr.�r---J SHEET INDEX SHEET A nt.,. RIVERSIDE 1 1 . SHEET 5 . _ 3 R R ., PCL. I -'_------ 4.tr..�.M�—• ( 1.9-s,„... O„R. ( 117-270-0031 I oQ I t LI „�_ _ 27p_a04 SHEET POL. (t1s-a6a-a1a PIslk FREEWAY K'- 117-270-0a6 s .- ----- - 1... ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE J ...“*\, _L \ 365 ROUTE 91 1 360 FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND P08 indicotes TPOB Indicates (R) indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing to State Prohibited ( ) Title 1 1 I 1 I Access NOTES FEET 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACQUISITION - Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983i2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Aii distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 0 t00 200 400 600 PREPARED By: PSOMASDISTRICT 3 Mutton Centro Cw;ve Ste. zoo (71417SI °73i3/0 ; s;s i703 8$3 tso.y DATE:06-15-12 REv.: 10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FAts: COUNTYiROUTE ' SHEET PPS SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R i V 91 6.9 1 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 56 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE. 22275-2 FEE GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. AREA 51,953 Sa. FT. APN 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 1\ LJ OL PROPOSED R/W FOR, LOT 3; BLOCK 73 5OJ T H R 1 VE:n i DW LAND AND WATER COMPANY ME 9/6 FOR, PCL 2 DOC , NO. 2006- °565691 O.R. A=02° 51 '28" R=176.53' R.9. 63/66 i FOR. SECTION 30 1 T.3S,; R.bW, 1 RANCHO 1 L SOSRANTE 1 { PCL, 1 1 DOC, NO, 2006- 0565691 0.7 , -- S81 °26'22"E 57.22' MS ua A=1 5°25'16"�R=2851 .00' L=767.34' 022'75-? ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND PO8 indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radio! Bearing t ) Title to State 1 1 1 I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in -feet unless otherwise noted, N81.a 40'38,41 123.15' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY /C/L STATIONING 22275-2 FEE ACOUISlTION 360 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 r PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 µue to. Centre 0,ivetSte. 260 Sonto ,'no, Lot+tarnIo 5i270, 0 4)1St-1373/0F4)545-ml 4iC:E DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA1t: DISTRICT ! COUNTY 8 R1V ROUTE 01 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET N(3. 2 TOTAL SHEET 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 57 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO, FT. 117-3 & 013 t-270-0t0-005 & 013 POR . SECTION 30 T.3S. y R.6►1J. • E RANCHE.) El- SOBRANT_ DOC. NO, 2006-- ME1 118 0565691 O.F1. R.S. 63/66 z- r ---- PROPOSED R /W e�` —..._ ___ _ — . _ _ _ _-,_ v 1- L�=iS°25`16" R=2851.00' I-J---1..1---I-� w w w r� s N ---"� w w In 4=16°40'20" R=2000.00' 1-581.97' N81 ° 40' 38"W t 23.15' EXISTING R/W N 2227 ,T2 • ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA. STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 ( } Title to State 1 1 I i l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1963(2007=00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grie distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACOUIS1TION distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. - FEET 0 25 50 700 150 PREPARED BY: S 3 eW,*m cer»re ]rive Stc. 700 01.0:S-73734710545.68M ;Pax; � DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V - - 91 6.9 J 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 58 EXHIBIT B2 PAR CEL# 22275-2 TITLE GRANTOR FEE PEARL STREET PROP, AREA 51,953 SO. FT, APN 1 ; 5-060-01 3 •, 015 117-270-005 s, 013 M SEE SHEET PO . 3�'- '' POR . LOT , 1 2- A- FOR . SECT I ON 30 � 00C , NO . 2006- ---- ASSEGSOP ' S MAP I,3S., - f?,6bU. 1 05656.91 fl.R. NO, 31 RAACHO �, � AMB 1 /42- 43 — EL SO8RAN'T R,S, b3)(66 � PC1 . `r `� MB 1/8 _ 000. NO, 2006- 0565691 O.R. r5$, ` PGL, 1 i p=03°24 DOC. N0. 2006- 0 56t E (R)' R-2e. • cs., 0565691 O . r? . S06 38 �..,` L,165.85 pR4t'©SED 131{gyp.' --.� .. L'=581 .97 , tV78°S 00 Raoo.oa' SpB:2a 222.77`5=' EX15T1NG R/W ICE FREEWAY 9� RIVERSIDE ROUTE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND 365 POB indicotes Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing i ',Title to State j 1 11 ( Access Prohibited SEE SHEET 5 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Oivide by 0,99997476 to obtain ground distances. all distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACOLIIS1 TION FEET 0 25 50 00 150 PREPARED By: 3 tgtiton Centre Or4,e, Sic 200 Soato Ant eottiora,o ?27o1 otty6t4313/ /14t$4S-B883 iro.) DATE: 05- 1 5- 201 2 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OE540 DISTRICT COUNT YI ROUTE I 8 R 1 V 91 SHEET PEA 6.9 SHEET N 4 FA*: d. TOTAL SHEETS 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 59 EXHIBIT B2 PARCELlt TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE 1 PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117_270-005 & 013 S 13 ° i 1 „4'2.W lR 119- 300- ��7g5'3gt� 021 T---',66261 A.T. & S.F. R. R, i 3q-12„E 140.88' . >4 Yt�f .r i ) , ' — }• x Co- MAC ' 115-060-015 1—f (N W cf1 � a re) £� zgcn n r ' .� r "4 ui k. p� ` S 93 ,y /aa 'ci3� 6 M1ft 'fY. M1iR _"Q = 7 �. J2' .s'as' ,. .d :'A' 1 Ka 1 4 rr„. CA ` p #, t, t 1� R � d rz f ,: EXIStl G 510� i i °p• R1°R v � �s� sue,, R F 3I O LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing of ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( ) Title to State C/L STATIONING ' ) I 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99937476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACOWSITION -.__.... distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. � _, _, _.,_r.._._......,_. , FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P S 0 A S J Mu. ton Contra Dri.•• SO.. 200 Sonia An0 tatilnrn:u S270: I2141Vit• 1)11,01+1545. M VOA{ DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R!V 91 6.9 5 - 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 60 PSO AS 1 EXHIBIT `CI' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-3 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 a In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document to No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81'40'38" West 13 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said 17 point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 18 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle of 20 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 29.38 feet to a 21 point on the general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a 22 non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a 23 radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said 24 general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to a point thereon; 25 thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land 26 described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non- 27 tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said 29 westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03'07'25" to the 'True Point of 30 Beginning. 31 P:l2PTG010501\SURVEYTEGALS122275_APN 117-270-0071Legals122275-3-PE.docx Page 1 oft 10/17/2012 _ EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 61 PS S 1 Containing 235 square feet. 3 See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 6 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 7 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 9 (0 11 Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 / 15 <4- 6Steeefa ! D - r7l Z 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 P i2PTG010501ISURVEYILEGALSl22275_,APN_I 17-270-0071C.egais122275-3-PE.docx Page 2 of 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 76 62 EXI-IIBT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-3 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 235 SO. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 11 i_z7o-oo4 o� 1-- � . T• &S•F • R„ R. 11g 3p0_02T 115-060-016 ti L ti i 0-"El -- — VI 00C .. NO. .2006--0565691 O. R, 4 PGl_. 21 POL. 1 1 17- 270-00611 --TPOB--�------ s, ---- --• - -_b------ _--_--f__�__ N814 I 212.14' i j POB i __ -I�� ! _-... SHEET 2 360 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/I_ STATIONING A% LEGEND •• POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radios Beoring { ) Title to State 1 I LA i Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5 -3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: IDATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: Oc540 €Alt: PSO AS 3 Butfcn Color* Or;ot, Ste. 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $owo Alto totiforni0 72707 M4)751-7373r1 710545-8883 (car) 8 RIV 91 _ _ 6.9 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17 63 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# IT1TLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22275-3 IESMT PEARL STREET PROP l 235 5O.FT. 117-270--007 ' f r � CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH 30' Cl 25.00' 1 24°40'57" 10 77' r C2 206.53' j 03°07'25" 1 1 .26' l RADIAL DATA BEARING t•.. Li�y �¢� R1 569°22'14"W !1 (-1) pr! 7 r J �, DOC., NO, .2006-OJ6v691 0, R, 4 ZD Q. o r- v , POR . LOT 3 i BLOCK /3 r ,� `'o° �, SOUTH RIVERSIDE (_AND o < AND WATER 1� COMPANY u , o ao ��y MB 9/6 A=89051'14,. ...... -... ` -A\P_ 6' `L°) ti R 3 5.00 • R 1 ' `'offrZa _``L4- 6.22"E `5' ,1. o �A4 4N g.21CT S8282 i.#.54 ... 52 a � 5 184iRj:3& �.. -- �`' "'llll' i fi'_07 55.52. �r 06.53• ., L ~6 . 19.65, �T — 96 22,:n 3 N87 °40'384 N81 °40'38..�, 212.1 7-Poe4 -__ PROPOsED LEGEND P08 indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing t FREEWAY ROUTE C )Title to State 91 RIVERSIDE 1 11 I Access Prohibited NOTES coordinates and bearings are on cCS 1983(2007.M Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 7 — PERMANENT WALE FOOTING; EASEMENT distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 1p 20 - 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 aeo tort t@ntrQ or4e ste. 'MO 5cx,to Arve, tee,tornio S2107 i2F4:Tgi.,111<(F)9)Sa5-5883 {taxi GATE:6-15 12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEET1 - ,:'t/ 7Crtt 1 6.9 2.. _ 2 L EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 64 PSO AS 1 2 EXHIBIT `Dr LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Cakrans Parcel No, 22275-4 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: ll 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a I8 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51 `28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet 22 through a central angle of 04°34'41 "; thence South 81'26'22" East 68.83 feet to the 23 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly 24 along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence South 25 41 ° 19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 26 having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°51'38" East; 27 thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence 28 North 81 °26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 29 30 Containing 6,614 square feet. 31 • P:12P7G0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN i117-270-005 and 013 115-060.013 and 015U.egals122275-4-1E.doex Page 1 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 65 PSO AS t See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 Prepared under the direction of 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 /0 -09-1Z Date PA2PTG010501LSURVEYILEGAL5122275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-0540T3 and O15%cga1s122275-4-PE_do`x Page 2 of 10J9I2012 — EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20 66 EXHIB T D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.ET. 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 117 ----___ SHEETS3 SHEET 4 270-004 0 r• &s. I R• R' it, 2 � 7 i 9-30p_ ti 1 5-060-Ot 6 CcSHEET n_ � I 00C PGL. 2 � I , 02 i NO, 2006- 0565691 0 , R . PCL. c 117-270-o06j R�s. 63 4 PCL, ( - _ _1_ TPOB POB 22�?q. 365 . .r— — 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Cit. STATIONING 1 iii LEGEND "r POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of _Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing - ( ) Title to State Ili I I Access Prohibited NOTES . Coordinates and bearings ore on cc5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances end stationing are grin distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 7 5 r PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in. feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 � 400 600 PREPARED 8Y: PSOMAS $ „vim,. ",,,re Crave .5. 2.34 Saoio eno-.ot'rorr'c 9210 I_y 1.07St-•/r3, 's44t5a5.8881 040 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT1COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PPS 'SHEET NO TOTAL SHEETS i `f S RI �7 91 6.9 { 1 4 � EXHIBIT A, PAGE 27 67 EX IBIS' D PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA i APN !, 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.ET.I 117-270-005 & 013 i POR.. SECTION 30 i✓SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO0;2. L0's" 3; 'BLOCK `/3 "f.3S.. R.b�l. Lai \\ AND WATER COMPANY SOSRANTE cc MS 9/6Mn 1 /8 POR , PCL , 2 PCL . 1 -.I DOC. NO. 2006- DOC. NO, 2006- ct 056569) O.R. 0565691 0,,R. vt Q.---- � R,S. 63/66 -' �o S45° 24'51 "W(R) 0 S40°50'10"W(R) 6 '._~4ar�►&..4241 2 . _ 5 18`37 R=284 .00' L=759.69. "*r►+. F- �, „, , ,. PROPOSED R/W C'�UJ w ..ilir N81°40' 38"W 161.2i' �� C2 Cl EXISTING R/W 103.1 ' N81 to w 40 38„W TPOB W v.) S37°58'42"W(R) POB 2 7:5"4 es CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH I BEARING DISTANCE Cl C2 02°51'28" 04°34'41" 176.53' 176.53' 8.81' 14.10' LI �S81°26'22"E L2 N81°26'22"W 68.83' 57.22' C3 15°25'16" 2851.00' 767.34' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CsL STATIONING LEGEND PO8 Indicates Point Of —ammo., ,Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning M) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 1 i 1) j Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES •2 Coordinates and bearings ore on CGS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 2 2 7 r L PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT __._ - FEET p 250 300 150 PREPARED BY: 3 Hutton ,:snare (wive, 70t 360 f�4175�7373i01415o59869] #foxt - DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OP540 PA#:PSOMAS DISTRICT - COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEET o 8 nra nIV n 91 6.7.. 2 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 22 68 EX IBIT D2 FARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA ARN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.F1. 117-270-005 R. 013 N X VI L.LI°40'38'"W w cn _ _. -' POR . 7,3S,; EL. --- --� r1=15° 18'37" SECTION 30 R,8W, OBRAI S f �JBft�1fy71r MB 1/0 R,S. 63/88 1 -, PROPOSED R%>:J U'OC. 0565691 PC' 4 NO, 2006- O.Z. — r , ~ , ` -- --�-�- � v�i -7- — R=2643.00' R=2851 .00 .r. L-581.97' FREEWAY — d=1 5° 25,1 6m• A=16°40'20"` S' ROUTE . gym -� N81 123.1 i ilk 97 2 R=2000.00` EXISTING RiW RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE C/L STATION NG - 363 LEGEND P0B Indicates Point TPOB Indicates True (R) Indicates Radial Of Beginning Point Of Beginning Bearing ) Title to State I.1 i I I Access Prohibited NOTES 2 2 2 PERMANENT WALE. FOOTING FEEL 0 ., 25 50 7 �- EASEMENT r1, t f 1,._ Coordinates and bearings ore an Cc5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ail distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ,1I !OG 150 PREPARED BY: S I taut tnn Cen+re qr}.e, Ste, ;00 $V to *no_,Coi;forn:9 WO- ldtm}7gs-'373r{7ttiglg-EBB3 ;Faxi DATE:06-1 -12 REV.: I0-09-12 EA: OF540 FAQ: SHEETS DISTRICT - - COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO.TOTAL 8 R I V 91 6.9 3 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 23 69 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR I AREA A P N 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SG,.ET. 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECTION 30 FOR. LOT. I2-A ASSESSOR'S ASAP ,_._ ., T.3S., R.6411. -- NO, 31r RANCHO PCL. 3 -- �� AMS 1/42-43 EL SrJaiZAN"C£ 00C. NO, 2006~ rCL, 11'''- MB 1/9 0565691 U:R. ---000, NO. 2006--- R.S., 63/66 r -� �- 0565691 U.R. P.. 1 i 00c . NO. Soso- � -' , s 'S06�43,07„E Rl R-28?:0,. ` -- EiR1 L- A. -- . 9.71 ' PROPOSED R /w M � , -- ��, 7:759 �:- - �p 15° 18 37 R,2a43.0 ��767.3a. 2 5 ` 16" R�2851 .0�., 506° 51 54 j2193 7„E LA I�- t 5° �` 2227574 �", g7 ` 1a 1- Oo ` _ _' . N78 `29,,Vi UJ a 0 w It, v) L�5$1 58 R � 2000 . a0' -` A=16°40'2Cr sag° 20,Sc�.sisti EXISTING RJ'NOQSIDE FREEWAY RIVE - ROU)E 9 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 7 365 LEGEND PoB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning 02) indicates Rodiol Beoring ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes ond bearings are on CC5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances ond stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 ? 5 - PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet runless otherwise noted. _ FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: 1 No tads [tile* Of ve, Sie. Ma Som0 Arw [o!ifGe0i0 9?707 (7!4(75!-7373/M4;545-e993 Sfo.7 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAs: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS 8 FUN/ 91 6.9 7 4 f EXHIBIT A, PAGE 24 70 " P S O A S 1 E X H I B I T ` E l ' 2 L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N 3 4 C a ! t r a n s P a r c e l N o . 2 2 2 7 5 - 5 5 P e r m a n e n t A c c e s s E a s e m e n t 6 A P N 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 , 0 1 5 a n d 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 , 0 1 3 7 8 I n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e , S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , b e i n g a p o r t i o n o f t h e 9 l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s P a r c e l s 1 , 2 , 3 a n d 4 i n t h e Q u i t c l a i m D e e d r e c o r d e d A u g u s t 2 , 2 0 0 6 a s t o D o c u m e n t N o . 2 0 0 6 - 0 5 6 5 6 9 1 o f O f f i c i a l R e c o r d s o f s a i d C o u n t y , d e s c r i b e d a s f o l l o w s : 1 t 1 2 B e g i n n i n g a t t h e s o u t h e a s t e r l y c o r n e r o f s a i d P a r c e l 2 ; t h e n c e N o r t h 8 1 � 4 0 ' 3 8 " W e s t 1 3 1 6 1 . 2 1 f e e t a l o n g t h e g e n e r a l s o u t h e r l y l i n e o f s a i d P a r c e l 2 t o a p o i n t o n t h e e a s t e r l y l i n e 1 4 o f t h e l a n d d e s c r i b e d i n t h e F i n a l O r d e r o f C o n d e m n a t i o n e n t e r e d S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 1 9 1 5 , i n 1 5 C a s e N o . 6 8 8 9 , S u p e r i o r C o u r t o f s a i d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , a C e r t i f i e d C o p y t h e r e o f b e i n g 1 6 r e c o r d e d O c t o b e r 4 , 1 9 1 5 i n B o o k 4 2 7 , P a g e 2 8 2 o f D e e d s , R e c o r d s o f s a i d C o u n t y , s a i d 1 7 p o i n t a l s o b e i n g t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e a s t e r l y h a v i n g a 1 8 r a d i u s o f 1 7 6 . 5 3 f e e t , t o w h i c h p o i n t a r a d i a l l i n e b e a r s S o u t h 3 7 ' 5 8 ' 4 2 " W e s t t h e n c e 1 9 n o r t h w e s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e a n d s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e 8 3 . 7 4 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 2 0 2 7 � 1 0 ' 4 5 " t o a p o i n t o n s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e , s a i d p o i n t b e i n g t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g ; 2 1 t h e n c e c o n t i n u i n g n o r t h w e s t e r l y a l o n g l a s t s a i d c u r v e a n d s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e 2 9 . 9 6 f e e t 2 2 t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 9 � 4 3 ' 3 1 " t o a p o i n t t h e r e o n ; t h e n c e S o u t h 8 0 ' 1 7 ' 3 6 " E a s t 2 3 4 6 . 4 1 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 2 4 . 0 0 f e e t ; 2 4 t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 2 4 . 6 0 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 6 � 1 7 ' 3 2 " ; t h e n c e 2 5 S o u t h 8 6 � 3 5 ' 0 8 " E a s t 1 2 3 . 4 6 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e s o u t h e r l y h a v i n g a 2 6 r a d i u s o f 1 , 6 8 6 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 1 5 1 . 4 2 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l 2 7 a n g l e o f 0 5 � 0 8 ' 4 5 " t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c o m p o u n d c u r v e c o n c a v e s o u t h e r l y h a v i n g a 2 8 r a d i u s o f 5 0 0 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 6 3 . 0 0 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e 2 9 o f 0 7 � 1 3 ' 0 8 " ; t h e n c e S o u t h 7 4 � 1 3 ' 1 6 " E a s t 5 0 . 6 3 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e 3 0 n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 3 5 0 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 6 5 . 3 9 f e e t 3 1 t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 1 0 ' 4 2 ' 1 9 " t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c o m p o u n d c u r v e c o n c a v e P A 2 P T C 0 1 0 5 0 1 L S U R V E Y I L E G A L S 1 2 2 2 7 5 A P N _ 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - C A S a n d 0 1 3 _ 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 . 0 1 3 a n d 0 i 5 U . e g a i s l 2 2 2 7 5 - 5 - A c c e s z _ d o � x P a g e I o f [ O / 9 / 2 0 1 2 E X H I B I T A , P A G E 2 5 7 1 PSO AS 1 northerly having a radius of I,432.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 137.16 feet 2 through a central angle of 05°29'16" to the beginning of a compound curve concave 3 northerly having a radius of 375.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 169.53 feet a through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave 5 southerly having a radius of 325.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 154.43 feet 6 through a central angle of 27°13'30"; thence South 89°05'30" East 63.16 feet; thence 7 South 02°32'29" West 25.01 feet; thence North 89°05'30" West 62.45 feet to the 8 beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence westerly 9 along said curve 142.55 feet through a central angle of 27°13'30" to the beginning of a 10 reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 11 said curve 180.83 feet through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a 12 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 1457.00 feet; thence westerly 13 along said curve 114.83 feet through a central angle of 04°30'56" to the beginning of a 14 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thencewesterly along 15 said curve 80.25 feet through a central angle of 11°29'40"; thence North 74°24'15" West 16 34.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; 17 thence westerly along said curve 35.97 feet through a central angle of 05'09'10" to the 18 beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a radius of 1,660.00 feet; 19 thence westerly along said curve 203.64 feet through a central angle of 07°01'43"; thence 20 North 86°35'08" West 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 21 radius of 250.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 27.46 feet through a central angle 22 of 06° 17'32' thence North 80°17'36" West 31.59 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 23 24 Containing 26,164 square feet. 25 26 See Exhibit `E.2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PTG01050RSURVEMEGALS122273 APN_t 17-270.00S and 013_115.0604B and 015\Legais122273-5-Access.docx page 2 of 10i9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 26 72 " " P S O A S 1 2 P r e p a r e d u n d e r t h e d i r e c t i o n o f 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 / D - d l ` - , / 2 D a t e P X 2 P T G O I 0 5 0 n S U R V E V I L E G A L S 1 2 2 2 7 5 A P ' N 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 a n d 0 1 3 1 1 5 . 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 a n d 0 1 5 1 L e g a 1 s 1 2 2 2 7 5 - 5 - A c e t s s . d a c x P a g e 3 o f 3 1 0 0 / 2 0 1 2 ` E X H I B I T A , P A G E 2 7 7 3 EXHIBIT 3E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 S0. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-0031 1,y_ T� o�� SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET �5 �I o I � � SHEET 2 q. T.4S. � ( F' fr-R• f I ,�o 1{ 1 115-060-016 I 9-3pp-Ozt f .. 01 —J Q POL. 2 I'► 0e. i I NO. 2006-05b56911 O.R.. POL. I I .a c ` R'8' I I 1a 117-270-006 63/66 ( _ i, L J I _ __ _._. W _._ r.�qJ TPOB POB 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING �: LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R1 Indicates Radial Bearing C ) Title to State 1 1 4 1 1 AcceSs Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.0M Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to abtoin 2 2 2 7 - PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. #_ FEET 0 t00 200 400 600 PREPARED By: PSOMAS 3 :%T bent-e %;4° Ste. 2" [dntd ia� `aC:fprnia �. 707 { 71a1751-t173,0ms.s-eesi v. 1 _ DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAS: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV n 71 6.9 1 G 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 28 74 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA ; APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,154 ! 115-060-013 & 015 50. FT: 117-270-005 & 013 POrR. LOT 3- SLOCI< 73 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND ?UR: ?r,L. 2 ?Uf1, SECTION 3� '' AND WATER COMPANY DOC, NO, 2006- T.3S,; R.601, to MS 9/6 0565691 J.i{. RA1�IO}IO cc EL SOSRANTE � T POB M1 1 /a ` R2 cc -- 586°35'08"E A=05°08'45" _____ � �L ___,.C3.� 123.46' ,,.„..- R=I686.00' L=151.42'. (1. — 1 ,- R1 (2227.5-5� ,, �� LS C14� N 86°35'08"�W'— r �-- A=07°01'43'--.'- 123.46 O �, f?.S. 63/66 ` ; —"" �`�Iiiii��. .. _° PROPOSED R/W „-t . N81 40'384 161 .21 ' R=1660.00'L=203.64' DOC. NO._ 200.6- 0565691 0 ., R , �' --- --- --- ° I w V) AI81 „ t, POB 123. 5' ��� EXISTING RIWlii w °�cb A. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY lit CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE Cl 27°10'45" 176.53' 83.74' L1 S80°17'36"E 46.41' ilk or C2 09°43'31" 176.53` 29.9.6' LS N80°17'36"W 31.59' C3 06°17'32" 224.00' 24.60' R1 S65°09`27"W C14 06°17'32" 250.00' 27.46' R2 S74°52'58"W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C/L STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning ----- TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radiol Beoring 9 360 < ) Title to State I I i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES , Coordinotes and bearings ore on cc5 1963(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT •;;C-g ground distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted, -- --__ FEET 6 25 50 104 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hurl°. Cent,*-Qriv*. St®. 2C'J 1+)35;-/373 €/0 t-IY545.8CO3 Ei O./ DATE:06-15-12 PEV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAlt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS1 8 R I V 91 6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 29 75 PARCEL# TITL EC GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECTION 30 T.3S.; a7.6W, RANCHO ?CI . I EL SOERANTE DOG, NO, 2006- M8 I/2 0565691 O.R. S74° 13"16"E 50.63' yC4 _..� CS I .S. 63/66 -" C a 2275 ; .. ' ter.. — ,. N c—'�-- \C N74°24'15"W C11 = ..=-,e�`� C10� 34.28'� _ -C —7 1� 1--T--- --�-1-F-�" r - w I 1 i I J�� T t�1 s u.1 EXISTING R/W PROPOSED R/W 4./) 1n --,_ --__ !yl � �``-- A=16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=581.97' f N81 °40'38"W 123.15' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY w 1./1 CURVE DATA CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C4 05°08'45" 1686.00' 151.42' C9 25°54'09" 400.00' 180.83' C5 07° 1 3'0$" 500.00' 63.00' C10 04° 30'56" 1 457.00' 1 14.83' C6 10°42'19" 350.00" 65.39' C11 11°29'40" 400.00' 80.25' sw C7 05°29'16" 1432.00' 137.16' C12 05°09'10" 400.00' 35.97' C8 25°54'09" 375,00' 169.53' C13 07°01'43" 1660.00' 203.64' 4 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY i CA STATIONING LEGEND PO® Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning Do Indicates Radio! Bearing 363 2 ( } Title to State I i i 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore an CCS 19830007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2, 2 7 5 - PERMANENT' ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. Ail distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. A I_,- I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPAnED BY: 3 A4?t4n Cantra Drive, Ste. 200 PTa4)J5i 1323/{31inp5+5-8 91 troxt DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA1t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM rSHEET NO. -TOTAL SHEETS 8 R t I V 91 6.9 3 - 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 30 76 EXHIBIT E2 RARLEL# TITLE GRANTOR j AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. ( 26,164 1 SQ. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 M 1--.M = N. w FOR. LOT. I2-A PGL. 3 ASSESSOR'S MAP POR. SECTION 30 DOG, NO. 2006- NO. 31 T.33. - R.6'W, 0565691 0,R, AiMB 1/42-43 RAheHO EL SJ�RAN'iE -1" 0---„/L2--- MB 1/a R.S.`t63/66 p.2 Ot ��1y '" '- DOG. NO, 2006- , r J� �� - - - � %. -- 4—., 0565691 O.R. / 0 ....-.� `� '�` ` � ° 13' 3 55 --21 t,A42. 125o 54 J0 6o, ---5 ,.�ZrL�F? � R,.5OO'0 �t , 0 L � ! .'.' , i �. Fi • Y +�� ,a - PCL. 4 ," =z. r" oSA g0.a3'"` .+' DOC. NO. 2006- vo. 05'65691 O.R. ---- — PROPOSED R/W -9T� `" N78°58 , W w Ld la cn L=581 „"- KtR-20p0•Q4 O _ 16°40'20" � d- EXISTING R/W of ' 0 LINE DATA 0._ BEARING DISTANCE rn L2 S89°{}5'30"E 63.16' -' L4 N89°05'30"W 62.45' REEVI° F E g� R1VER�I� ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE C/L STATIONING LEGEND 6 P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I i I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00I Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet :.finless otherwise noted. 2 2 2 7 - PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 4 25 50 1e0 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 Nutted CentroINN*, Sta. 204 OF4a4:�- 37S/0tl}gi L884 1ra4) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: Of540 FAD: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM `SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEET O�j 8 RIV 91 G/� 6.9 �i 4 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 31 77 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 LINE DATA ---_� N BEARING DISTANCE A=00°45'34" L2 S89605'30"E 63.16' Po R=5779'66' L3 502°32'29"W 25.01' L=76.62' L4 N89°05'30"IN 62.45' .___ L2� F "� S77°34.12„E 140A. T ss & S-FR . .R. k r) PCL. 11 -� DOC. NO. 2006- 3 "co. I- L4 056569 I 0 . R , POR. LOT. 12-A ;, Nl 115-060--015 w _ -- — ASSESSOR'S MAP 0 N N O . 31 'no -2 AM S 1 /42-43 ''' ,5 7,.5)� o wv. w to � IA R.S. 63/66 _2�' s PROPOSED R/w mo 0���9 Z° 32, Oq' E �,, �5p 00 v1 D'p � � A� XISTING R/W J f. N78°1.00' S41 °1 9'57"E VORS�p 58 2Q W 1 5.92 RI R°°1E 9 31 � LEGEND POB Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) g ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Indicates Rodial Bearing C/L STATIONING ( ) Title to State 11 I 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone G. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground 2 2 2 7 5- 5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT --.- distances, A11 distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 1W++en een+re Dr...e S+e. t00 �(7;'417Si-/373i171:is+s48en gro.) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAts: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ R IV 91 6.9 5 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 32 78 5O AS EXHIBIT `F1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Calfrans Parcel No. 22275-6 5 Permanent Utility Easement 6 APN 115-060-013 & 015 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence along the general northerly 13 line thereof the following two (2) courses: 1) North 77°34'12" West 140.88 feet to the 14 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 and 2) westerly along 15 said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 00'45'34" to a point thereon; thence 16 South 02°3229" West 95.94 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave 17 northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 18 09°59'54" East; thence westerly along said curve 73.33 feet through a central angle of 19 01°28'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing westerly along said 20 2,837.00 foot radius curve 14.82 feet through a central angle of 00° 17'58"; thence North 21 39°12'38" East32.30 feet; thence North 51°44'48" West 248.65 feet to a point on the 22 northerly line of said Parcel 3; thence South 74°26'30" East 64.80 feet along said 23 northerly line to a point thereon; thence South 5,1°44'48" Fast 206.79 feet; thence South 24 39°12'38" West 25.00 feet; thence North 51°44'48" West 7.50 feet; thence South 25 39° 12'38" West 21.53 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 26 27 Containing 6,181 square feet. 28 29 See Exhibit `F2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 30 31 PAIPTG01050PSURVEIRLEGAL5122275 APPI137-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 0151Lega1s\22275-6-PUE.d°ex Page I of 2 10/9/2032 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 33 79 PSO AS 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 Prepared under the direction of 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 1v -D9-47 Date PA2PTG01050115URVEYlLEGALS122275 APN 117-270-005 And 013 115-060-013 and 015lLega15122275-6-PUE.docx Page 3 of 2 10151012 - EXHIBIT A, PAGE 34 80 " F A R C E L # 2 2 2 7 5 - 6 t 7 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 3 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 7 T I T L E P U E 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 6 E X H I B I T F 2 G R A N T O R 3 6 0 6 , 1 8 1 S 0 _ ; _ S H E E T I N D E X R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y L E G E N D . P O B I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g T P O B I n d i c a t e s T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g ( 1 0 i n d i c a t e s R a d i a l B e a r i n g ) T i t l e t o S t a t e I I I 1 ; A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 & 0 1 5 S H E E T 2 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 6 3 6 5 R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y C ! L S T A T I O N I N G N O T E S C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e a r i n g s a r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 . D i s t a n c e s a n d s t a t i o n i n g a r e g r i d d i s t a n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 4 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t a i n g r o u n d d i s t a n c e s . A l ! d i s t a n c e s e r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . F E E T 0 2 2 2 7 5 n - 6 P E R M A N E N T U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 P R E P A R E D B Y : 3 m o t o n C o n t r a t r i v c S t e . ? C . 9 S r n s u + C o r a o r n ; 4 3 d t r 1 7 5 t " ? b 7 3 a 1 ; 4 1 1 , 5 - W a l f 0 . ) . D A T E : 0 6 I 5 - 1 2 R E V . : 2 ; 0 - 0 9 - 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 F A s s : D I S T R I C T C O U N T Y R O U T E S H E E T P M S H E E T N O . I T O T A L S H E E T S ' 8 R R / 9 1 E X H I B I T A , P A G E 3 5 8 1 EXHIBIT F2 PARCEL# TITLE 22275-6 PUE GRANTOR AREA PEARL STREET PROP. 16,181 SO, FT: CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00°45'34" 5779.66' 2837.e0`1 76.62' 73.3 ' C2 01°28'52" C3 00°17'58" 2837.001 14.82' `S74°26'30„E r 46.46• 64 8p R•S' b3/b" O. 51ef;. RADIAL DATA ! BEARING R1 1 S13° 1 1 `22"W R2 i S09°59'54"E R31508° 31 '02"E R4 S08° 1 3'04"E I APN 115-060-013 & 015 LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 N39°12'38"E 32.30' L2 S39512'38"W 25.00' L3 N51°44'48"W 7.50' L4 539°12'38"W 21.53' A. T. & S.F. Re R. 4..02°39'i 0" R.5779,66, � Jo 7 POD . SS-r i �� �p4 ' l3+��" R4 ••••,/ i 2 • N V Nd: rl it) 0 a% (Ni J Cs ti Sg. C1 1403k,T2 W PCJR+ LOT. I2--A ASSESSOR'S MAP POB NO. 31 AR 1 /•42-43 POL . 4 DOC NO. 2006- 0565691 0 . R . po , �`1 gp 5°6\'1-,(39 21 �1,F \-' $o S12j1 PROPOSED R!W p0. N78°58'24„W R�2000. a 131.00' p�16° a0L gal �'° S41 ° 19.57" Q 15.92' P08 TPOB (R) EXISTING R /W LEGEND Indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True Point Of Beginning Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State I(Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtein ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. .a ??, RN-1-E r-.M Cr.CV ho REEWAY 22275.6 J PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY: ' Hu+.ion [Cnire Drive Ste. d60 sc.,' eni° o, Cotitorn9p107 <714i751-7j11ti7.o154s-6:61 WOO DATE: 06-15-2012 DISTRICT 8 COUNT Rlv REV.: 2; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA::: Y SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS i 2 2 ROUTE SHEET PM 91 6.9 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 36 82 PS AS 1 EXHIBIT `G1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-7 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document 10 No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: t1 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line 14 of the Iand described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29,1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said 17 point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 18 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 18.22 feet through a central angle 20 of 05°03'17" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 28.54 feet to 21 a point on said general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a 22 non -tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial 23 line bears South 69°22'14" West; thence northerly along said curve and said general 24 southerly line 12.54 feet through a central angle of 28°44'54" to a point thereon; thence 25 South 81 °26'22" East 21.31 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in 26 said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve 27 concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears 28 South 59°49'01" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 15.89 29 feet through a central angle of 04°24'31" to the True Point of Beginning. 30 31 Containing 304 square feet. P:12PTG0105011SURVEYtLEGALS122275_APN_117-270-0071Legats122275-7-TCE.docx. Page 1 of 2 10/ 17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 37 83 PSO A 1 2 See Exhibit `G2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 3 4 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 5 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 6 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 7 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 8 9 10 Prepared under the direction of 14 12 13 14 -' Ms� f0-/7 lZ 15 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS122273 APN 117-2',0-0071Lega1s122275-7-TCE.docx Page 2 of2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 38 84 EXHIBIT G2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR I AREA APN 22275-7 TCE PEARL STREET PROP.I 304 SO. FT. ( _ 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 1 7 7_270'Goa 00 � O A. r S.F, R.Re 11y-300-a21 ,A. W 115-060-016 n• � tr 1 . --I oc Lij?CL. 2 1 DOC. NO. 2006-0565691 0.11. PGL. ! Pot.. 117-270-00611 1 _T POB-- �- ...... a_2. 7--------�--i.. 21-t•—� Kat ---- - - _ .,__ :=-----K-. R--. ;- - -"- = ---__ -_ - 1 40'34 -- -_ - ✓� I 2.14i pas 3Zo 1�2�2' 7-7) ---\\ 3G5 �--— I.` SHEET_2 _ J 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning 7P08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radio, Bearing C }Title to State 1 1 i i ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain �/ 2 2 2 ! 5 •- 7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. ter - FEET G 100 700 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Mut ion Centre Drive, Ste: 200 t2111t?751"a7373i(Tie)5ieria 5 92707 6663 (fart} DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: 0E540 FAit: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 71 6.9 1 - 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 39 85 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP PARCEL# 22275-7 k w ct TITLE T CE 30' Ct 14-1 Q O n 4 n; r co ,n z. LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 S81°26'22"E 21.31` LEGEND AREA 304 SOFT. A P N 117-270-007 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 25.00' 28°44'54' 12.54' C2 206.53' 04°24'31" 15.89' N81 40 40'38"11/ POB indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial 8eoring i Title to State 1 [ I I I Access Prohibited RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 S69°22'14"W R2 N81 ° 52'51 "W R3 S59°49`01"W PCL 2 2006-0565691 O. R POR , LOT 3; BL..UCX 73 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LANDAND WATER COMPANY Me 9/6 N81 °40'38„ w 212,14 PROAOS ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY PSO AS 3 Wttco Cm/re [rive, Sae. 2Lxi Scot* .vw, COi7/*rn:o 927oz 47r4):s,-7313,0,4AJ5-ese3 ikbo DATE: 06-15-.12 REV.: 10-17-.12 EA: OF540 FA#t DISTRICT 8 COUNTY R1`J ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 2 TOTAL SHEETS 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 40 86 PSO AS 1 2 EXHIBIT `ail' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-8 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1 and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'3 8" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having'a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 22.91 feet through a central angle of 20 07°26'09" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along said easterly line and said curve 18.72 feet through 22 a central angle of 06°04'33" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 83.19 feet to 23 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet; thence 24 easterly along said curve 294.53 feet through a central angle of 05°57'39'; thence North 25 59°49'50" East 46.06 feet; thence South 74°24'15" East 73.17 feet; thence South 26 87°22'34" East 66.13 feet; thence South 02°37'26" West 10.98 feet to the beginning of a 27 non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,839.00 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 00°57'28" East; thence easterly along said curve 20.04 feet 29 through a central angle of 00°24'16"; thence North 02°37'26" East 8.02 feet to the 30 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet, to 31 which point a radial line bears South 01 °22'25" East; thence easterly along said curve P:12PTGOIOSOASURVEY1LEGALS122275 APN 117-270.005 and 013 113.060fii3 and 015lLegals'22275-8-TCE.doex Page I 01'2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 41 87 8 9 10 PS O AS 1 278.36 feet through a central angle of 05°38'01" to a point on the easterly line of said 2 Parcel 1; thence South 41°19'57" Fast 6.07 feet along said easterly line to a point thereon, 3 said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radnus 4 of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 07°04`21" East; thence westerly s along said curve 20.99 feet through a central angle of 00°25'26"; thence South 41 °21'39" 6 East 8.50 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°44'59" East; thence westerly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence North 81 °26'22" West 68.83 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1 Containing 11,819 square feet. 12 13 See Exhibit'H2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Prepared under the direction of 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate' System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. /0-of--/2 Date PA2PTG0105011SUR.VEYN.EGAIS122275_APN f t 7-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and Of 511.egalst2.2275-8-TCE.doex Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 42 88 EXHIBIT 112 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11,819 SOFT. 117-270-005 8& 013 ? �0-004 T� 2 ~ 2 OC.I SHEET A. r,S. I I NO„ 2006-056569!I0.R. I PCL ~s. ( 6.3/66 - -_ _ SHEET INDEX SHEET 4 _ f ��► I � I f f'Cie'e, ----- -. : 3 F, R P.R. , 1 ___-__-----_- i I ��9'300- f I i __-- f117-270-003 I ,,T a ASHEET v, le PCL I 115-060-016 , PCL . FREEWAY l IQ- 1 f 7-270-aG6 -= ---i -_-_:; I - - _- � f --:-_ — � � T P08 365 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE P08 pe -----._. _:. t28 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point TP08 indicates True (R) Indicates Radial Of Beginning Point Of Beginning Bearing ( ) Title to State j 1 I i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES FEET 22, 2, 7 - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT .., _. - Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00i Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ali distances ore in feet unless oTherwise noted. .. t:._r 1 C 100 200 y 400 500 PREPARED 8Y: PSOMAS 3 Huf100 Conte* CrEra, Sty. 200 S 0i0 400, Coi.10,0t0 97707 171.)7St-+I73/i7111945-9053 (s00 RATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE - SHEET PM SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS 8 t R 1v 91 6.9 . 1 ' �1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 43 89 POR; LOY 3, Oi OCX 13 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND ANO WATER COMPANY MB 916 ?OR, PAL, 2 DOC. NO. 2006-- 0565691 D,R. _ r of TPOB L1 -�' v-05°57'39" R=283I1 .00' L=294.53' _ L 2 -- _ p-15°18`37" R=2843.00' i =759.69' -- POR. SECTION 30 T.39.; R,6W. RANCHO EL SO8RANTE me i ie PCL. I DOG, NO. 2006- °565691 O.R. EXHIBIT I-12 PARCEL# TITLEI GRANTOR AREA ;LPN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT. 117-270-005 & 013 w W PROPOSED R /'N S45°24'51 "W(R) (\ I! J 3 0 ao � 2 spiv NS1 °40'38"W EXISTING R/W CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH Cl 07°26'09" 176.53' 22.91' C2106°04'33" 176.53' 18.72' LEGEND P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) lndicotes Radio, Bearing C }Title to State 1 1 I 1 } access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0,99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 161.21• 123.15' -- N81°d0.38"W L INE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 L2 S81°26`22"E N81°26'22"W 83.19' 68.83° ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY / C/I. STATIONING 9 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 22275-8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 100 150 SEE SHEET PREPARED BY: 3 w+a+ran cemra Or;vf Sit. 200 Sonia Ana, Coritarnip 42703 (PIOM-?333/014i545•ee83 (F40 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: 0f 540 rAit DISTRICT ' COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 44 90 EXHI IT H2 PARCEL# ITITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 FCI . } D DC . NO, 2008- FOR, $ECTION 30 0585691 D.R. T.3S,; R.61. RANCHO RADIAL DATA EL SOBRANTE /a BEARING PAB } R.$, t53166 ------- R 1 R2 R3 S00° 57 "28"E S01 °21'44"E S01 °22'25"E 1 N59° 49'50"E '"` — -- _ S02°35.59"W (RI .._. ---`. SN024,15„ L4 R3 ° ©=05°57'39` 23.17 S87 22"34"E C4 _.--_ / � 66..1 3' R y2831 .00' �' 222'7 $11 - r � � L-294.53' , l L3 L ^755.59`� _ __ _ _ �A=15° 18'37" R=2843.04�' �- R2 i-- � `� i t_ _ 1�1--i _ t W Lei PROPOSED R/W C3 _ 0 - �" v1 ______ . ---- !alLU ul _— =16°40'20" R=2000.00' L-581.97' N81°40' 8w 123.15' EXISTING R/W w V/ LINE DATA CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH L3 L4 S02°37'26"W NO2°37'26"E 10.98' 8.02' C3 C4 00°24'16" 05°38'01" 2839.00' 2831.00' 20.04' 278.36' r4i ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C2 STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True. Point Of Beginning IR) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 { ?Title to State ill I 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99937476 to obtain 2 2 2 5 - . TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in fee' unless otherwise noted. - 3_ '-.argI FEET 4 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 ✓.y.t ton <erntro Urivt Sot. 200 Sai`o A. C077fornio 92707 {71dg7Si77373,971A;St5-5883 (%o.} DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS - 8 I RV 91 6,9 3 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 45 91 EXHIBIT 112 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 4 22275 8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP, 11$19 S©.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 re)�-- w ui w. N FOR R . SECT] ON T . 3S i R. nW RANCHO EL SOBRAN T E M13 I/8 PCL . 1 UDC , NO. 2006-- 056569I 0.t{. -- _--05°38'01" '' -L-15°183t PROPOSED .RfW 30 . F .S. 63/66 c07°00, • 2g1.OHf �R3r�9 `-- —2g43.0�p R= � PCL, 3 '- '� DOC. NO. 2006-'-. ``` i 565691 J.,R. 0'� , � (R. � 6.sE . 2 L -27a 36 - >r E tS06 -, 0, L�159.t o,59E(R1 $p64 A L-581 -97, c0$°,20.5g"E(Ft) RIVERS ICE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE °. •'' .- ' �, ' -- $4 1o � 6.07 � POR, LOT. ASSESSOR — NO. �• AAAB I ' .� •„ -,;-- --(jab, - 0565691 �.w7,.E `� °OA°21 o 25 2� p�00 R-2:657r 20.9' °539 sAt$0 N78°5804'.."` 12--A ' S MAP 31— /42- 43 PCL. 4 _ NO, 2006 -_ O.R. t— '� , E 24 w rREEwAY FREEWAY R,2p0O.a0 R/W 91 365 ,. 4_16° 40'20' EXISTING �Qu�� C/L STATIONING d F LEGEND POB Indicates TP08 Indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing to State Prohibited ( ) Title } 1 i 1 E Access NOTES 2 2 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FEET 0 25 50 7 5- EASEMENT Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain grouno distances. All distances are in feet'"' Unless otherwise noted. 100 150 PREPARED BY: J Hutson Cenire arivek Sic. 200. n;',:0 Ana. Ca:.{ornlo -141 ?7`At75i-7J3f(7t diS45-eP.BJ iso•1 DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FAu: DtSTR1CT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS1 O 8 7 I V 3 i 9 6. 4 l `1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 46 92 6/12/2013 .01111116., 1 pROJEcr OTIPS.,a Commission Request RCTC THE COMMISSION IS REQUESTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS : 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. n NORTH 1 EXPRESS LANES 1 WESTBOUND REGULAR LANES 1 EASTBOUND REGULAR LANES 1 6/12/2013 PARCEL 1 Pearl Street Properties, LLC FEE 41,252 *SF (lbw/ Parcel Arra 354321 SF) T Permanent Wall Foonna Easement 6,919 SF • r Temporary Construction Easement 1Z 123 SF no% , Permanent Utility Easement 6,191 SF .a; ...fan" , Efforts to Resolve Differences 91 .Jt ytw{tp • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on January 22, 2013. • The owner's attorney has not expressed any concerns or questions related to the project's design. • RCTC has attempted to negotiate a settlement however the property owner's attorney has requested that we go directly to a Resolution of Necessity. 2 6/12/2013 Efforts to Resolve Differences RCTC 91 pROJECTr f.2.11-,,..� • On February 11, 2013, owner's legal counsel sent RCTC a letter (dated 2/1/13) declining RCTC's offer to acquire, stating that they "strongly urge RCTC to adopt a Resolution of Necessity and promptly file an eminent domain action': • All efforts to settle have been rebuffed. Parcel 2 Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona A NORTH I EXPRESS LANES WESTBOUND REGULAR LANES EASTBOUND REGULAR LANES 3 6/12/2013 PARCEL 2 The Redevelopment Agency of the a of Corona FEE 4,4 8 SF ( otal Parcel Area 16,553 SF) Permanent Wall Footing Easement 1,631 SF Temporary Construction Easement 1,907 Sl Efforts to Resolve Differences ,j PRoJecr rr r+ra RCTG • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on December 27, 2012. • Due to dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies in the State of CA eminent domain is necessary to acquire title to this property. 4 n NORTH N EXPRESS LANES i WESTBOUND REGULAR LANES I EASTBOUND REGULAR LANES 6/12/2013 MP' Efforts to Resolve Differences ROTC 91 pROJEcT Man dm.-- • The offer Just Compensation was presented on April 27, 2012. The offer was the full appraised value of the property. • Since offer was made 21 meetings or phone calls were made to the owner or his attorney attempting to negotiate a settlement. There were many more attempts to communicate with the property owner. No settlement was reached. • In early April 2013 the owner's attorney indicated that they contacted RCTC's legal counsel to directly negotiate with them. ,"-'` 91 PROJECT 1 1t N.wa.p Staff Recommends: RCTC THE COMMISSION ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. 6 INDIAN WELLS (760) 568-26I 1 IRVINE (949) 263-2600 LOSANGELES (21 3) 61 7-8100 ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, P.O. BOX 1028, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 PHONE: (95 1) 686-1450 ( FAX: (95 1) 686-3083 ( WWW.BBKLAW.COM MARGARET L. BARNES (95 I ) 826-8357 MARGARET. BARN ES@BBKLAW.COM May 28, 2013 Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 SACRAMENTO (916) 325.4000 SAN DIEGO (619) 525-1300 WALNUT CREEK (925) 977-3300 WASHINGTON, DC (202) 785-0600 VIA HAND DELIVERY MAY 20 2013 D' RIVERSIDE COUNTY Re: Original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners of TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Resolution of Necessity Hearing Scheduled for June 12, 2013 RCTC/SR91 Corridor Improvements Project Property Ownership: Santiago Rodriguez and Jorge L. Rodriguez, APN 117-270-002 (CPN 22273) Dear Jennifer: Attached is the original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners, with proof of mailing, of the hearing on the Resolutions of Necessity scheduled for June 12, 2013. The original Notice for the late addition (approved by Caltrans) was mailed on May 24, 2013. It will be necessary for you to note the proof of mailing of the Notices at the hearing. The documents needed for the hearing (Resolutions of Necessity, Agenda Report, Memorandum from Legal Counsel) have been provided in draft form to Gina Gallagher for her review and revision. She will provide the finalized versions to your prior to the hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, 41 a Margare/CL. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachment copy: Gina Gallagher, Senior Right of Way Agent (w/copy of Attachments, via e-mail only) 17336.02100\7987553.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7967487.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, ri Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: May 24, 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP n 1 CM Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7967487.1 FEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Those portions of Lots 37, 39 and 40 and all of Lot 38 of Block "B" of Lands of the South Riverside Land and Water Company, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside; State of California, as said lots and block are shown on map on file in Book 9 page(s) 6 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, California, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard, 100 feet wide, with the Westerly line of Pearl Street, 60 feet wide, said point also being the Southeasterly corner of that certain 1.97 acres parcel of land described in deed to State of California recorded July 2, 1959 in Book 2502 page(s) 338 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; Thence along the boundary line of said 1.97 acre parcel the following courses: North 8° 13' 53" East (bearing assumed for purpose of this description) along said Westerly line, also being the Easterly line of said Block "B" 441.03 feet; Thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears South 8° 13' 53" West, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet through a central angle of 100° 08' 07" a distance of 43.69 feet; Thence North 71 ° 36' 00" West tangent to the proceeding curve 130.72 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 40, last said point being the true point of beginning for the parcel herein described; Thence Westerly along the arc of a curve tangent to the proceeding course, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1030.00 feet through a central angle of 7° 01' 15", a distance of 126.21 feet; Thence Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a curve from whence a tangent bears North 73° 39' 15" West, concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 35.00 feet through a central angle of 86° 46' 02" a distance of 53.00 feet to a point in the Westerly line of said Lot 39, last said Westerly line also being the Easterly line of Joy Street, 60 feet wide; Thence North 1 ° 06' 47" East, leaving the boundary line of, said 1.97 acre parcel along the Westerly line of said Lots 37, 38 and 39 a distance of 144.42 feet; Thence South 74° 19' 02" East 159.63 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 37; Thence South 8° 06' 47" West along the Easterly line of said Lots 37, 38, 39 and 40, a distance of 173.05 feet to the true point of beginning. APN: 117-270-002 17336.02100\7978167,1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 POR. C(TY OF CORONA (POR. SEC. 30 T3S.R. 6 W, 9 POR SOUTH R/V LAND i1N0 WATER CO. I 4 MltalfgY • \ :i /J JTS�dC., 1 lawa�e Lam. �T <� R1V£Rtl \ r F AY RT. 9/ � ~"` `? ) �f Lot 3 �� r/e Poa-is-rot- // w '9\ �- r far B/R. 73 � ,.,r,e l2 \\ ??'t \ GI A MY YM CI PLw R,.Q/PI R, H/,/ ASSESSORS MAP BK. //7 PG. 27 RIVERS/OE CYXINTY CAL/f. Lot M rR A. are ASS M B 9/6, B S.B. Soda Riverside Land B Water Co. A. M. B. //42- 43 Assessor Map No. 3/ P.M. 23/70 // 7 —27 P- �S S£Pr. /974 il P Zoe CEIV7M"M 611:11==r1LT ©17�ri�i iveirzITZWsa MIIIIR3lm Q� ���7 oziervirmis 11111111♦1♦ EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-270-002 (CPN 22273): Santiago Rodriguez Record Owner 2210 North Main Street, Suite B Santa Ana, CA 92705 Jorge L. Rodriguez Record Owner 2210 North Main Street, Suite B Santa Ana, CA 92705 Charles Krolikowski, Esq. Courtesy Copy Newmeyer & Dillion, LLP 895 Dove Street, 5th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 DATED: May 24, 2013. Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7967487.1 INDIAN WELLS (760) 568-261 1 IRVINE (949) 263-2600 L.OS ANGELES (2 1 3) 61 7-8 100 ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 I M� BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW SACRAMENTO (91 6) 325-4000 SAN DIEGO (6 1 9) 525-1 300 WALNUT CREEK (925) 977-3300 3390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, P.O. BOX 1028, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 PHONE: (95 1) 686-1 450 1 FAx: (95 1) 686-3083 1 MARGARET L. BARNES (95 I ) 826-8357 MARGARET. BARN ES@ B B KLAW. COM April 29, 2013 Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 HINGTON, DC 785-0600 APR 2 9 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION OOMMISSION VIA HAND DELIVERY Re: Original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners of Resolution of Necessity Hearing Scheduled for June 12, 2013 RCTC/SR91 Corridor Improvements Project Property Ownership: Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNS 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-260-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 (CPN 22275) Property Ownership: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona, APN 102-020-044 (CPN 22111) Property Ownership: Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., APN 102-270-010 (CPN 22111) Property Ownership: HAGF Enterprises, LLC, APN 117-070-029, CPN 22249) Property Ownership: Nicola-Lampkin; APN 118-040-021 (CPN 22153) Property Ownership: Tressen, APN 118-160-021 (CPN 22192) Dear Jennifer: Attached are the original Notices of Hearing to Property Owners, with proofs of mailing, of the hearing on the Resolutions of Necessity scheduled for June 12, 2013. The original Notices were mailed on April 26, 2013. It will be necessary for you to note the proofs of mailing of the Notices at the hearing. The remaining documents needed for the hearing (Resolutions of Necessity, Agenda Report, Memorandum from Legal Counsel) will be provided in draft form to Gina Gallagher for her review and revision. She will provide the finalized versions to your prior to the hearing. 17336.02100\7910755.1 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission RE: RCTC/SR91 CIP, RON Hearing of June 6, 2013 April 29, 2013 Page 2 Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, "/,7 te-t )61,totet_ MargarL. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachment copy: Gina Gallagher, Senior Right of Way Agent (w/copy of Attachments, via e-mail only) 17336.02100\7910755.1 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF CONTINUED HEARING Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The descriptions of the property to be acquired are defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A," attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 17336.02100\7886312.1 4 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: 1Vlaijk A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17 3 3 6.02100\7 8 86312.1 i Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission; "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to <RCTC, absolute ownership of the.. property. "Access Easement" refers to an non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns,together with the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction site, as determined" necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant ;trees or any other vegetation on any portion' of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns., RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other; vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation: No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent of RCTC, ; Property Owner shall not cause,; directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with. or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC;' including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. '"Temporary construction easement (TCE) refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement' rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours 17336,021 7868203.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to ROTC, including its successors and assigns, a;,permanent and perpetual, easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove, at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limitedto sewers, : water, electrical 'systems and communication systems, consisting _ wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, ' manholes, handholds, , and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by ROTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not: erect or construct, or permit to, be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of ROTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to :utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. ROTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined ;in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 17336.021=7888203 i EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 S� EXHIBIT `AI: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltlrans Parcel No. 22275=1 5 Fee Aeouisitigp 6 APN 117-270-007' 7 8. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17' 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Containing 130 square feet 29 30 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel'2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly coiner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'3r West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation enteredSeptember 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified. Copy thereof being' recorded October 4,1915 in Book 427, Page282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point being the True point of Beginning; thence North 81'40'38" West 19.65 feet . continuing along said general southerly line to the beginning of a curve concave:: northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 15.87 feet through a central angle of 36°21'56"; thence South 81 °26' 22" East 29.38 feet to a point on said westerly line, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 52°17'05" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle :of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning. 31 j See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. PA2PTG010501\SURVEYILEGALS22275A APN 117-270-0071Legals122275-1-Fee.docx 10/17/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AS This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and, the Grantor herebyreleases and relinquishes to the Gramce any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based' on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476`. Prepared under the direction of IQ"/712 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date P:12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275 APN 117-270-00711,ega1s122275-1-Fee.docx Page 2 of 2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 FEE EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL*: TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275 1..::. 117-270-003(;: PEARL .,STREET PROP. 130 SO. FT. Jana NO; 2006-056569 J 0, R, PCL. ) 'SHEET LEGEND P08 indicates Point Of Beginning:... TPOB indicates True Point of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing. C )Title to Stote 1 11 i (Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1963(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are griddistances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distonces ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 11.7-270-:007. 115-06g-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY: C/L STATIONING PREPARED BY: QS O M A S 3 Muiten Centre ar:re Ste. 200 Sonic Ana, Coi:forn:a 92707 t71U751-73737(7u1545-C493. Wax) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R1V 91 6.9 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5' PARCEL* 22275-1; TITLE FEE EXHIBIT A2 GRANTOR AREA PEARL STREET PROP 130: SQ.FT.. A P N 117-270-�007::.:: POR. LOT,,3i gLOOX 7,3 SOUTI.1 Ri VERSI DE LAND AND WATER COMPANY M.8 9./ 6 i., a tu 0 4 r� 0° A27 (i) PCL 2 DOC. NO. 2006- 0565691 U . R . cc vcr IQ so M , 1 • . cv o, co zy) a©a 1 z oo, 0 a..o„� oa d` g°51 ,1 Q„ v' a' _- �1- o6' 1 t 0.1 \ 14°41 .� 8111(0) 4=36°21 ,56,t R'25.80, (24 LEGEND Pop indicates Point Of Beginning -POB Indicates True Paint Of Beginning (R) indicates Rodio! Bearing.: Title to State I ! I 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore On CCS 1963(2007.00i Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are In 'fleet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED Dr: PSOMAS 1 rturron Cent,* Wee Ste, Hq Santa erro Coiirorrio ✓12707 171 Q 751 < 3734 71e15e 5-0993. 1104 DATE:6-15-12 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREE WA Y 222 -1 FEE 'ACOU1SITION FEET 0 10 20 40 REV.: 10-17-12. EA: ©F540 ROUTE SHEET PSI EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 SHEET ..:N NO. 60 FA#: :. . SHEETS 2 2 3 4 5... 6 7 8 9 10 1t EXHIBIT `g1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No.22275-2 Fee Acquisition APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 12 Beginning at the' southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West. 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly lime 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29,1915,;:in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said. 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28"; thence South .81 °26'22" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave :. 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41°20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve: 25 : 165.85 feet through a central angle of 03 °20'58"; thence North02°32'29" East 95.94 feet 26 to a point on the general northerly line of said Parcel 4, said point being the beginning of 27 a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 5;779.66 feet, to which point. a 28 radial line bears South 13° 11'22" West; thence easterly along said northerly line the . 29 following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 30 00°45'34" and 2) South 77'34'12" East'140.88 feet to the northeasterly corner of said 31 Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 73.97 feet along the general easterly line of said P:UPTG9105011SURVEYII.EGA1S22275_APN_I17-2711435and 013.115460-013and 015ltegals122275-2-fEErdocx Page 1of3 I W9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 PS AS Parcel 4 to; the southeasterly comer thereof and the beginning of a non _tangent curve 2 concave northwesterly having a radius of I ,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 3 South 18'23'16" East; thence westerly along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4- 4 and along said curve 199.21 >feet through a central angle of 05°51'11" to the most 5 southerly comer thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; 6 thence South 41 °19'57" East 15.92 feet along said northeasterly line to the most easterly 7 corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78°58'24" 8 West 131.00 feet to: the most easterly .comer of said Parcel I, said point being the 9 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to 1 o which point a radial line bears South 08°20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly 1 t line of.said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses: I} along said curve 58197 feet 12 through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40'38" West 123.15 feet to the 13 Poird of Beginning. 14 15 Containing 51,953 square feet. 16 17 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 18 and relinquishes to the Urantee any and all abutter's rights or ac:cess,.appurtenant to 19 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 20. 21 :. See Exhibit 4132''attached hereto and made a part hereof 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are basedon California Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may obtained by dividing 25 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described . The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 27 28 29 30 31 P32PTG010501LSURVEMEGALSt22275 APN 11 .270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 0151Leaals122215-2.FEE.doet Page 2 of 3 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 P:12PT00105011SURVEVIL-EGAL.S122275_APN 117-270-005 and 013_1 iS-060-0i3 and 015U.egals122275-2-FEE:docx Page 3 of 3 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 PARCEL# tt7-270-003 ROUTE 91 TITLE EXHIBIT B2 GRANTOR AREA APN 115-060-013 & 015 117-2:70-005 & 013.. L115-060-01 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE91 RIVERSIDE 'FREEWAY Crt STATIONING LEGEND P013 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of 9eginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Titre to State ill It Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al! distances "are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET _0 :00 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: P ® AS 3 Hutton Centre. Oriva Ste. 5OO Some Mo talirern:o S27O7 t714051•7373/014150.8$83 front DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 1. 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 EXHI PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR. AREA' APN 22275-2 W ct :) Ct a PROPOSED FEE PEARL STREET PROP. PDR .LOT 3, BLOCK 7d sou-ri-i RI VERS I DE LAND AND'14ATER COMPANY MB 9/6 51,:953 SO. FT. FOR POL. 2 DOO. NO, ::.2006- 0565691 O.R. S81°26'22"E. 57.22.' ©-1 5°25'16" R=2851.00` L=767.34'� 115-.060-013 & 015 117,-2.70-005< & '013:: POE?. SECTION: 30 T .aS . `' fi! . 61N. RANCHO EL SOBRANTE AAS 110::: :. . PC,L.. 1' 000. No. 2006- -`' 0565691O.R. �o``� N81 Q 40'38"W 161.21 � 1 N81°40'38"W o ,� EXISTING R/W POB 123.1 5 0' co 0, 0 (22.�'75_2. LEGEND P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning IR1 Indicates Radial Bearing. Title to State ) I I 1 I ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6.'Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unaees otherwise noted. I `i T ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 77 STATIONING 9 PREPARED BY: PS O M A S 3 Nut ton <entr• 0rt.10gea. 260 Tonto Ana, Catla ifarn232707 (710751.737311714)545-6443 !Foal - DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA:t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 X IBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN cv w w z w N 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. POR. SECTION 30 T.3S. , R.blk. RANCHO EL SOSRANTE PAS I'S �N81 ° 40`38"W 1 23.15' LEGEND FOB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State' HI I i I Access Prohibited ( ) NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet Unless otherwise noted. 51,953:SO. FT..: a=2851.00' 11.5-060-013 & 015 117-270--005 & 013 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Clz STATIONING `Zr SEE SHEET PREPARED BY: PSO AS 3 Rueeon Ceotre Or We Ste. 200 Sa"ta An., c0lifaroi0 92707 �'. (71417S-/373i17t7i949.0803 Mix) DATE:'06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET ,PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 3 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 ( ) PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA. A P N 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET.... PROP. 51,953 SO. FT.: 115-060-0.1.3 &`015 1t7-270-005 & 013 17UR , SECT I ON 30' T,38 • R'.b411. RANCHO EL < 8D8RANTi✓ MB 1/8 PCL.. 1 DOC. NO 2006 ,� o :56`tE (R) t�b5691 J }7 S06 3$ PCL . 3�`� DOC N0. 200 �. 056569.R. SOP SO •GOC;.NO. 0565 691..: • P:200 LEGEND Pfle indicates Paint Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing;:.: Title to State Access. Prohibited '• ?DR . LOT 12-A- ASSE88DR .'S hAAP. ND.'31 AIMS 1./42-43 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 19830007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ail distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 22275 2 FEE ACQUISITION. 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 2 Hutton Contra 0riva, Sta. 200 Sonto ono COO/Ornio 12707 (71,11}751-7317r171415A$-8803 WOO DATE:06-1 5-2012 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF 540 FA*: D1STR1CT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 4 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 P ARCELtt 22275-2 TITLE FEE EXHIBIT B2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. '22 49 (R) R- 45,3q' 5779.E LEGEND PQ8 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning: (R) Indicates Radio! Bearing { Title to State 1 III l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) 2one 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. AREA 5i 953.SO. FT..:: APN; 115-060-013 &:01..5:` 1 17-270 005 : & 0>13 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING FEET 0 25 50 1©0 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Murton Contra Dr1.r SU. 200 Santo Arlo Loilmen:a kt/or (714(758.7)3),(7141515.6e93 Iro44 DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM 8 RIV 91. 6.9 SHEET NO._ 5 TOTAL SHEETS 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14. 2 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-3 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document 10 No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'3r West 13 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29,1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said 17 point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 18 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21' 13" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a;central angle of 20 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°26'22" West 29.38 feet to a 21 point on the general southerly line, of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a 22 non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a 23 radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said 24 general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to'a point thereon; 25 thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land 26 described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non- 27 tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said 29 westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03°07'25" to the True Point of 30 Beginning. 31 P:12PTG0105011SURVEY\LEGALS122275 APN_117-270-0071Legals122275-3-PE.docx Page 1 of 2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 2' 3 1 See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1I Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 15 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00'epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALSt22275 APN_117-270-0071Lega1s122275-3-PE.docx Page 2of2 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 16 PARCEL* 22275-3 117-270-0031 TITLE ESMT EXHIBIT C2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET. PROP. AREA 235 SO. FT. I DOC. NO. 2006-0565691 O.R, POL. 21 PCL. 1 006 1 R.S. 1 .. -. -.. -L.. w.... ,ice ------ . - W81 1240a 4'3$' 1. L SHEET 2 j ROUTE 91 R1 VERSIDE LEGEND P06 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP013 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( Title to State ! 1 1 i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. APN 1'17.-270-007 : 11.5-060-016 ROUE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C!L S TA TIONIND PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutfan Centre Oriw Ste. 200 Soma Ana catitornie 92707 (71-4)791-7373/0u,9e9-0007:t�ox► DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 £A: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT. COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS S RIV 91 6.9 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17 PARCEL## 2227573 TITLE ESMT EXHIBIT C2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP POB Indicates Point Of Beginning, TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning CR) indicates Radial Bearing C Title to State I I t I Access Prohibited AREA 235 SO.FT. A'PN 117-270-.007 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA :: LENGTH: C1< 25.00' ` 24°40'57" 10.77' C2 206.53' 03°07'25" 1'.1.26' FOR LOT 3> BLOCK 73 SOUTH RI VERS1 DE ► ACID AND WATER COMPANY MIS 9/6 ROUTE 91 RI VERS IDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6: Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: PS MAS' 7 Hutton centre Dr4e ste. ?on Sonia AM. Co6fornio WO7 571ai7St-7171t(114 S-!643 lfnxi DATE:6-15-12 DISTRICT 8 REV.: 10-17-12 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 EA:OF540 FA*: SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 2 TOTAL SHEETS 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 PS s 2 3 4 Cakraus Parcel No. 222754 5 Permanent Wall Footint: Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 EXHIBIT' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8 1n the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recordedAugust 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, m 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County,' said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42 West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 02°51'28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point' of Beginning; thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet through a central angle of 04°34'41"; thence South 81°26'22" East 68.83 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15 ° 18'37"; thence South 25 41°19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 26 having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point'a radial line bears South 06°51'381' least 27 thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence 28 North 81 °26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 29 30 Containing 6,614 square feet. 31 P12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALSl22275 APNJ 17-270.005 and 013_115-060413 and 015ULegals122275-4-PE.doex 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 Page 1 oft See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Prepared under the direction of 9 10 --� 11 . _ 7 �h '1,h 12 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 13 14 15_ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 The distances described herein are, grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone,6, 2007.00 epoch. Grounddistances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2P1120105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN 117-270-005 and 013 l 15-060-013 and 0151Laga1s‘22215-4-PE.docx 10/9/2012 Pap 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20 1 PARCEL* 117-270-003 TPOB EXHIBIT D2. GRANTOR 36.0 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 1�9-300'a21 30 1197060, 16 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State j I I 1 l Access Prohibited ) NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide. by 0.99997476 to obtain ground . distances. Ati distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 40© 110 600 PREPARED BY: P S 0 M A S 3 t?utton Centre W.* Ste. 20.3 San+a ono Coi.61711e iYlOr 7ti1751-'�3731(71� 1545.8981.(ioai OATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OFS40 FAsi: DISTRICT s COUNTY RIY ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 1 TOTAL SHEETS, 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 21 w PARCEL' 22275-4. PROPOSED R!W C2 TITLE ESLIT GRANTOR PEARL STREET :PROP. PU?. LOT. Sit BLOCK 73 sou TH '' RI VERS1 DE LAND AND WA'TER'CUMFANY MO 9/6 AREA 6614 ;SO.FT. PDF7.. POL 2. DOC. NO. '2006�- °565691 0. Fi S45°24'51"W(R) S40°50'10'W(R) CURVE DATA DELTA < FRADIUS LENGTH Cl 02°51'28" 176.53' 8.81' C2 04°34 41 n 1 76.53' 14.1 0' C3 15°25'16" 2851.00' 767.34' LEGEND PO8 TPOB (R) ) Indicates Point Of Beginning Indicates True PointOf Beginning Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State 1 L I 1 I Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 A'PN 117-270-005 84 013 POI?.. SECTI ON :30; T.36. , R btu RANCHO EL soaRAN-rz MB Ila 000 1\10. 2006 0565691 O.R. L INE DATA BEARING DISTANCE. L1 L2 S81 °26'22t'E N81°26'22"W 68.83' 57.22' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA. STATIONING RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are infeet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT T_ -. mmimmo FEET 0 25 50 PREPARED BY: PSOMA'S 3 Hutton Centre Orly*, Ste. 200 Sento Aro Colifornio 04707 (7i41751-737311714)S4S-8003 tFe.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA:OF5,10 FAts: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RI,/ ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 22 PARCEL# 22275-4 TITLE ESMT GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. AREA 6614 SO.FT'. APN 1.17-270-005& 01 3 N u_l w 2 vl w W v'a r�art. SF.cYlON 30 '1'.:3.8 R.6►H. R.ANCHU , EL SOEIRANTE M9 1/d 1 �t 4=15° 18'.37" R.S. 63166 PROPOSED' R/W p=15°251161' 4= 16° 40'20" N81 °40'3$'(ty 123.1S• R=2843.00' R=2851.00' 'GL. I DOC .'' NO. 2006- • 0565691 O.R. •` 2,2 75'' q R=2000.001 EXISTING R/W .` 759469 ` ...----- L=.761 r L=581.97' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB lndicotes Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing; 3 Title to State; ill l l Access Prohibited t 2 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STA N N ` �63 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CC5 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distonces and stationing ore grid distances Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT PREPARED 8Y: P O Mi 3 Huston Centre Grive, sie- :•00 Soho *no. Colifornso 97707 (/ 10731.737347$ 4131S-8883' { rok l DATE06-15.12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PEA 6.9 . SHEET NO. 3 TOTAL SHEETS 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 23 EX PARCEL#, TITLE GRANTOR, AREA AP>N 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SOOT. 117-270-005»& 013 PORT . L.OT . 12-A FOR, SECTION 30 ASSESSOR' S MAE_ _ _ T.38.,R.6W. _ --- 110. 3I— i=t. sOaGHO PCL. 3,f �" Aim 1 /42-45 ) A00C . NO. 2006�- PCL . ' 9 'J `� laAG 112 056569I G.R. --DOC. NO. 2006-_ Z.S. 63/bb f ®-- 056569I> 0.R.> PCL. 1 l ..- DOC. NO, 2006- � °565691 U. R. f '' • r poQ3° 1 rj° 26�1 ,--'" .. + R i 2$A2.Q0 *-' 06°A3 "- -- 07 ✓ R�-161 ••'6 ® ! ..- Ali .� ,� -- -' , '.+.fir 9. 71 ' PROPOSED R /W M a-- -~ r7 S9.6g" _ -- =-.j g;37"r`'-:. .00 L Q ' __...-.- ®71 _. L -7 67.3 2g51.44 °51 ,3g�" (R) 25.16" W.:S06 S41>o t 9`57'"E 12.13 w p_15° L2227'5-:4 gg1.97� td7g� 1.00 w IA cn , l.- 58'2q" ° 40,2C" R-:: 00 Oao 0,59"E.I. -------- A.16 S 2 EXISTING R/W F(�EEAY W 1 RrVERSI®E �Q�TE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 1' 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Paint Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing I. }Title to State, 1 I I 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 19B342007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 7 - PERMANENT WALL ,FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in fleet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 154 PR£PAREO BY: A S 3 Mutton Centre °rive, Ste. 200 - Santo 0.no C®titarro:e 92707 (784)74i-7773rt71-1M49-2003 tta.t DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 4 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 24 7 8 9 10 11 PSOI Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-5 Permanent Access Easement' APN 115-060-013, 015 and''117-270-005, 013 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38"West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 ofDeeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 83.74' feet through a' central angle of 20 27°10'45" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along last said curve and said easterly line 29.96 feet 22 through a central angle of 09°43'31" to a point thereon; thence South 80°17'36" Fast 23 46.41 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 224.00 feet; 24 thence easterly along said curve 24.60 feet through a central angle of 06°17'32"; thence 25 South 86°35'08" East 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a 26 radius of 1,686,00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 151.42 feet through a central 27 angle of 05°08'45" to the beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a 28 radius of 500.00 feet•, thence easterly along said curve 63.00 feet through a central angle 29 of 07° 13'08"; thence South 74° 13'16 East 50.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 30 northerly having a radius of 350.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 65.39 feet 31 through a central angle of 10°42'19" to the beginning of a compound curve concave P:12PTGOIOSOKSURVEMEOALS122275„APN 117-270-005 and 013_115-060.013 and 0ISU.egals12227S-5-Access.doax page I of 3 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 25 PSO AS 1 northerly having a radius of 1,432.00 feet; thence easterly alongsaid curve 137.16 feet 2 through a central angle, of 05°29'16" to the beginning of a compound curve concave: 3 northerly having a radius of 375.00, feet; thence easterly along said curve 169.53 feet 4 through a central angle of 25'54'09" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave 5 southerly having a radius of 325.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 154.43 feet 6 through a central angle of 27°13'30' thence South 89°05'30" East 63.16 feet; thence 7 South 021'32'29" West25.01 feet; thence North 891'0510 West 62.45 feet to the 8 beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence westerly' 9 along said curve 142.55 feet through a central angle of 27°13'30" to the beginning of a 10 reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along i 1 said curve 180.83 feet through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a 12 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 1457.00 feet; thence westerly 13 along said curve 114.83 feet through a central angle of 04°30'56"'to the beginning of a 14 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 15 said curve 80.25 feet through a central angle of 11 °29'40' ; thence North 74°24' 15" West 16 34.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; 17 thence westerly along said curve 35.97 feet through a central angle of 05°09'10" to the 18 beginning of a compound curve concave southerly having a radius of 1660.00 feet; 19 thence westerly along said curve 203.64 feet through a central angle of 07°01'43"; thence 20 North 86°35'08" West 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 21 radius of 250.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 27.46 feet through a central angle 22 of 06°17'32' thence North 80°17'36" West 31.59 feet to the True Point of Binning. 23 24 Containing 26,164 square feet. 2s 26 See Exhibit 1E2' aftached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California' Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch_ Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PT00105011S11AVEYILEGALS122275_APN 117-270-00S and 013_115460.013 and 0141Legals122275-5-Acoass.docx page 2 of 3 I0KJV2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 26 2' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Prepared under the direction of P:12PTG0105011SURVEY1LEGA13122275 APN_I 17-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and OIS1Lega1s122275-5-Aeasa.docx page 3 of 3 1019/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 27 PARCEL*. 22275-5 L TPOB TITLE PAE EXHIBIT E2 GRANTOR PEARL. STREET PROP. } 360 AREA 26,164 SO. ET. 115-060-013 & 01.5; 117-270-005;& 013 ROUTE 9] RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 'RIVERSIDE FREEWAY. C/I. STATIONING LEGEND POB indicates Point OfBeginning TP08 indicates True Paint Of Beginning (R) indicotes Radio! Bearing Title to State 1 II 1 (Access Prohibited } NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0. 100 200 4 09 600 PREPARED BY: A S 3 Hutton Centre Grive See. 200 Sento 270 (71A)75 r�i371,0t4J545Corifonki Adee3 RFo.S DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAat DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 •: 1 •. 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 28 PARCEL* 22275-5 TITLE- PAE GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. Pail, LOT 3; SLOON 73 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND .NATER COMPANY MS,, 9/6 PROPOSED R/W IT E2 AREA 26,164 SO.. FT. POR. POL. 2, DOC.NO 2006 d565691 O.R, EXISTING R/W CURVE DATA DELTA, RADIUS LENGTH Cl 27°10'45" 176.53' 83.74' C2 09°43'31" 176.53' 29.96' C3 06° 1 7'32" ''224.00' 24.60' C14 06°17'32" 250.00' 27.46' LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radio, Bearing Title to State I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and Stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 'ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. APN' 1.15-060-013 & 015 1 1 7- 270-005'' & 01' 3 T 3S..; R.6W, RANCHO EL SOBRANTE M8 1>/8 PCL. 1 ._-DOC. NO. 2006 0565691 0. it' :...._ LINE DATA', BEARING DISTANCE L1 S8O°17'36"E 46.41' L5 N80°17'36"W 31.59'' R1 S65°09'27"W R2 574°52'58"W ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY / CA. STATIONING E PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT PREPARED BY: PSO AS Hutton Centro Oriva, Ste. 200 Spntd An* 4olli/ornia 9270? (714)751-7373/0141545•eee3 00.1 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: -3; 10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV' 91 _6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 29 " E X T E 2 S E E S H E E T 2 P A R C E L # 2 2 2 7 5 - 5 . T I T I _ E P A E G R A N T O R P E A R L S T R E E T ; P R O P . P O R . S E G T 1 ' U N 3 0 T . 3 8 . ; R . 6 W . R A N C H O E L . S O B R A N T E M ) / 8 p = 1 6 � 4 0 ' 2 0 6 N 8 1 e 4 0 ' 3 8 6 W 1 2 3 . 1 5 ' R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y A R E A 2 6 , 1 6 4 S O . F T . A P N 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 & 0 1 : . 5 . 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 0 0 5 & 0 1 3 : P C L . 1 D O C . : N O . 2 0 0 6 . 0 5 6 5 . 6 9 1 O . R . E X I S T I N G R / W P R O P O S E D R / W C U R V E D A T A D E L T A R A D I U S L E N G T H C 4 0 5 1 ' 0 8 1 4 5 " 1 6 8 6 . 0 0 ' 1 5 1 . 4 2 ' C 5 0 7 � 1 3 ' 0 8 " 1 5 0 0 . 0 0 ' 6 3 . 0 0 ' C 6 1 0 6 4 2 ' 1 9 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 ' 6 5 . 3 9 ' C 7 0 5 � 2 9 ' 1 6 6 1 4 3 2 0 0 ' 1 - 3 7 . 1 6 ' C 8 , 2 5 6 5 4 ' 0 9 " ; 3 7 5 . 0 0 ' _ 1 6 9 . 5 3 ' L E G E N D P o B I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g , T P O B i n d i c a t e s T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g ( R ) i n d i c a t e s R o d i o l B e a r i n g C T i t i e t o S t a t e i H I I A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d N O T E S C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e a r i n g s o r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 : D i s t a n c e s a n d s t a t i o n i n g o r e g r i d d i s t a n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 9 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t a i n g r o u n d d i s t a n c e s . A l l d i s t a n c e s o r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . P R E P A R E D B Y : P S O A S 3 m u t t o n C r n t r a D r i v e S t e . 7 0 0 S o a , o A n a , C o l i f o r n i 0 9 2 7 0 7 1 1 1 4 1 7 5 5 - 7 3 7 3 / 1 7 1 0 5 4 5 . 8 0 0 3 ( r 0 x ) C U R V E D A T A D E L T A R A D I U S L E N G T H C 9 2 5 6 5 4 ` 0 9 " _ 4 0 0 , 0 0 ' 1 8 0 . 8 3 ' C 1 0 0 4 6 3 0 ' 5 6 * * 1 4 5 7 . 0 0 ' 1 1 4 . 8 ' C 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 � 2 9 ' 4 0 " 4 0 0 . 0 0 ' 8 0 . 2 5 ' C 1 2 0 5 � 0 9 ' 1 0 " L 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' 3 5 . 9 7 ' C 1 3 0 7 � 0 1 ' 4 3 " 1 6 6 0 . 0 0 ' : 2 0 3 . 6 4 ' R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y C / L S T A T I O N I N G 2 2 2 7 5 - 5 P E R M A N E N T A C C E S S E A S E M E N T F E E T 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 : 1 5 0 D A T E : 0 6 - 1 5 - 1 2 R E V . : 3 ; 1 0 - 0 9 - 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 F A * : D I S T R I C T 8 C O U N T Y R I V R O U T E 9 1 S H E E T P M 6 . 9 S H E E T N O . 3 T O T A L S H E E T S 5 E X H I B I T A , P A G E 3 0 e PARCEL# 22275-5 TITLE PAE E.XIII GRANTOR PEARLSTREET PROP. . `I' E 2 AREA 26,164 S.Q.:F T. APN 115 060-013 & 015 117 `270-005 &< 01. 3 SEE SHEET 3' POR. SECT I ON ;:30 T.38., >R 61/1. RANrH0 EL SOBRAN fE MEI ;I / 8 PCL. 1 DOC. NO. 2006- 056569I O:R4 d 25 PCL.. ' 3 DOC. NO, 2006.- 0565691 O.R. R ..S'.. :-'o yg109 R=.`1O PROPOSED R/W fl�16° 40'20" i 63/66 r+: R=200Q.00 EXISTING R'/W LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L2 S89°05'30"E - 63.16' L4 N89°05'301'W 62.45' FOR. LOT ...:..I<2-A ASSESSOR'S MAP NO. 31 AMB I142`43 °13 , 6,21 • PCL. 4 DOG. 0565641O.R. L^5g1 F REEVIAY RIWERSI1"E Rpl1YE 9� - cT ROUTE 9 FREEWAY 0 coo !o 131,00' N78°58'24-w �n LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB ,Indicates True Paint Of Beginning. (a) Indicates Rodial Beoring C ) Title to Stote- Hi i ) i Access Prohibited 6 i NOTES, Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6.'Distances and stationing, are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997416 to obtain ground distances All distances ore 'in::feet unless otherwise noted. 227.5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nwrter centre Dr40 Ste. 200. Soma Ana. C0,1,04100 92707 {714j751.2373,0'41545.0003Ylf0.$ DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: 0E 540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEE T NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 I 6.9 4 5 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 31 PARCEL* w w to 22275 5 .41 a-00° 4 5' 34" R=57 79.66' .� L=76.62 TITLE PAE EXH BIT E2:. GRANTOR STREET PROP. PCL'.. 4 DOC.. NO. .:.2006- 0565691 O.R. LEGEND AREA 26,164 SO. FT. APN - 115-060=013<&. 015: 1,17-270-005 &.;.013 LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L2 589°05'30HE 63.16` L3 S02°32'29"W 25.01' E4 89°05'30'4 62.45' 11.5.. 63/66 POB indicotes Point Of Beginning. TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (10 Indicates Radial- Bearing t Title to State Li 1 I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain, ground distances. Ali distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: ?SOMAS 3 AQttan centre Qriw Ste. 2(o) Santa Ana COlirpfnia 4i707 (71.)751-7373117141545.Seel (fax) ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE :.FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 22275-5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT 0 25 50 109 . DATE: 06-15-12 Rev.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 32 SHEET PM 6,9 SWEET N 5 i50 FAIL:... Q. TOTAL SWEETS 5 EXHIBIT `F1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275.6 5 Permanent Utility Easement 6 APN 1`15-060-013 & 015 i 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Docunnent No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence along the general northerly 13 tine thereof the following two (2) courses: I) North 77°34'12" West 140.88 feet to the 14 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 and 2) westerly along 15 said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 00°45'34" to a point thereon; thence 16 South 02°32'29" West 95.94 feet to the beginning of a nomangent curve concave 17 northerly having a radius of 2,837.00' feet, to which point a radial line bears South t8 09°59'54" East; thence westerly along said curve 73.33 feet through a. central angle of 19 01 °28'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing westerly along said 20 2,837.00 foot radius curve 14.82 feet through a central angle of 00°17'58"; thence North 21 39° 12'38" East 32.30 feet; thence North 51 °44'48" West 248.65 feet to a point on the 22 northerlyline of said Parcel 3; thence South 74°26'30" East 64.80 feet along said 23 northerly line to a point thereon; thence South 5,1°44'48" East 206.79 feet; thence South 24 39° 12'38" West 25,00 feet; thence, North 51 °44'48" West 7.50 feet; thence South 25 39° 12'38" West 21.53 feet to the True Point of Beginning,. 26 27 Containing 6,181 square feet. 28 29 See Exhibit `F2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 30 31 P:UPTG010501lSURVEYILEQALS122275_APN 117-270-005 and 013 '115-060-013 and 0151Legaist22275-6-PUE.dea Page i of 1019/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 33 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate- 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 I Prepared under the direction of 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260' P:UPTGO10501%URYEY1l.EGALS122275 APA( —117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 0151L.egnIA22275.6-PLIEdocx Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 34 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22.275-6 PUE PEARL .STREET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 1 15-060-01.3: &, 015 17-270-007 117.270-006 360. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDEFREEWAY LEGEND .POB indicates Point of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of. Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing ( a Title to Stote Jill( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances end stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground. distances. Alf distonces are in feet unless otherwise noted. 5- 060- 0' ROUTE 91 RIVERS/DE FREEWAY: C!!; STATIONING 22275-6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMF_NT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PS MAS 3 rt.,. ton (Intro 6rive Ste. 2,10 Sra,la nna Cat:iornio 92707 (71 0751. I315^eee3 (roMI. DATE:06-15-12 REV.:2i 10-09-12 EA: OF54d: FA*:: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS V RIV 91 6.9 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 35 EXHIB T F2 PARCEL# 22275-6 TITLE PUE GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP': AREA 6,181 SO. FT. APN -�S7goz6, CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00°45'34" 5779.66' 76.62' C2 01 °28'52'. 2837.00' 73.33' C3 00°17'S8" 2837.00' 14.82' I. 146.46, of bb 0 s o s PROPOSED R a., 000 .'C/ �=16° 40'20" R.200 �- EXISTING R/W .41.. c,7. N 1.11,1 .—° cr. 0 eta RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 S13°11'22"W R2 509°O59'54HE R3 S08° 31 02"E R4 508° 1 3'04"E T. & ,5402°39'10" R*5779.68' L, S/ ° . 7 L 3 vF A 2 9' C1 LINE,DATA BEARING DISTANCE Lt N39°12'38"E 32.30' L2 539° 12'38"W 25.00' L3 N51°44'48`'W 7.50' L4 539°12'38"W 21.53' R. R [V77°g4,1 144i8_,2 W FOR.. LOT, 12-A ASscssOR'S MAP Poe N0., 31 AMS ! 142-43 PCL., 4 c E1E10. NO, 2006- • 056569 I 0, 950.pt3 .00' J, N78°58,24" 0 131.00' - do S41 ° 19'57" 0 15.92' P0B 7POB (R) LEGEND Indicates Point Of Beginning indicates True Point Of Beginning indicates Radial Bearing' Title to State 1 1) 1 ( Access Prohibited t.r 91 RivE.R51 T 8 9,51 t RIVC/�-RSjAT 0 2 s\~ FRE FRE 9 I AY G' Y NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 2 , 7- PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT FEET 0 40 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nut ion Centre Drive Ste, 7°° Santo en*. Celifornip St {7141151-7373r(7e•IS45-88U Wax) DATE:06-15-2012 REV.: 2; 10-,09-12 EA: OF 540 F A#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS a R1 V 91 e 6:9 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 36 PSO LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-7 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-007 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document , No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81°40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point > on the westerly, line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915 in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 18.22 feet through a central angle of 05°03' 1 T' to the True Point of Beghming, thence North 81 °26'22" West 28.54 feet to a point on said general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears. South 69°22'14" West; thence northerly along said curve and said general southerly line 12.54 feet through a central angle of 28°44'54" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 21.31 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve 27 concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point' a radial line bears 28 South 59°49'01" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 15.89 29 feet through a central angle of 04°24'31" to the True Point of Beginning. 30 31 Containing 304 square feet. Pa2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275 APN_117-270-0071Legabl22275-7-TCE.docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 37 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ee Exhibit `G2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. he distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate ystem of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 'd distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described-- The mean . mbination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. . Tian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG0105011SURYEMEGALS122275_APN_l 17-270-0071Legals122275-7-TCE.docx Page 2 of.2 10117/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 38 PARCEL*' TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-7 L I 12045ej) LI SHEET 2 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 304 SO. FT. DOC N0. 2006-0565691 O.R. PCL. 2.1 PCL. "1 11 T-2T0-006jl R. g 11 b3/b6 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE LEGEND h PO8 indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing Title to State j i l l 1 Access Prohibited FREEWAY ) 117-270-007 11S-060-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CA STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide . by 0.99997476 to obtain ground, distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: P O M Q S 1 Kution Cenire Drive, St.. 200 Sonto An0 COlifeenfO 92707 t 7rxi751.43731t7tA150.46e3 (F04 DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17.12 EA: 0F540 FAO: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.9 SHEET NO. 1 TOTAL. SHEETS 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 39 PARCEL 'TITLE 22275-7 TCE- Q=89051'�4H 25,ao, L�3g.2?' ,r GRANTOR AIR E A PEARL:::: STREET PROP 304S0.F.T. LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE L1 S81 ° 26'22" E 21 .31 ' LEGEND P08 indicotes Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates true Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing::.;:: . Titie to State j i 1 I j Access Prohibited APN' . 117 270-007 CURVE DATA RADIUS 'I DELTA LENGTH Cl 25.00' 28°44'54" ! 2.54''; C2 206.5.3' 04°24'31" 15.89' POL. LOT 3; BLOCK 73 SOUTH R l VERS 1 DE LAND AND WATER COMPANY NIB 9✓6 NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances ,and stotioning ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOM 3 Ho ton [emirs Orive Ste, 200 Santa ♦no, Cg9liforn:o 112707 -- 171+175f-7)7347,05+.5-$887 If orl DATE:06-15-12 REV,: 10-17-12.. EA:OF540 FA*:' DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET N0.'T4TAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 40 2 3 4 Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-8 5 Temporary Construction. Basement 6 APN l 17-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1 and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: It 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915,,in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 22.91 feet through a central angle of 20 07°26'09" to a point on said easterly line,' said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence continuing northwesterly along said easterly line and said curve 18.72 feet through 22 a central angle of 06°04'33" to a point thereon; thence South 81°26'22" East 83.19 feet to 23 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet; thence 24 easterly along said curve 294.53 feet through a central angle of 05°57'39"; thence North 25 59°49'50 East 46.0E feet; thence South 74°24'15" East 73.17 feet; thence South 26 87°22'34" East 66.13 feet; thence South 02°3726" West 10.98 feet to the beginning of a 27 non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,839.00'feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 00°5728" East; thence easterly along said curve 20.04 feet 29 through a central angle of 00°24' 16" thence North 02°37'26 East 8.02 feet to the 30 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet, to 31 which point a radial line bears South 01 °22'25" East; thence easterly along said curve P.12PTG0105011SURVEMEGALS\22275 APN_117-270-005 and 013 115.060.013 and 0151.egals122275-8-TCE.doct Paga 1 of 10N9V2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 41 7 8 9 10 l 278.36 feet through a central angle of 05°38'01" to a point on the easterly line of said 2 Parcel 1; thence South 41 ° 19'57" East 6.07 feet along said easterly line to a point thereon, 3 said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius 4 of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 07°04'21" East; thence westerly s along said curve 20.99 feet through a central angle of 00°25'26" thence South 41 °21'39" 6 East 8.50 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°44'59" East; thence westerly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence North 81°26122" West 68.83 feet to the True Point of Beginning. it Containing 11,819 square feet. 12 13 14 15 See Exhibit `112' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 16 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 17 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean t8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 19 20 I Prepared under the direction of 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. BuIlock, PLS'5260 P:t2PTG0105011SURYEYILEGALS122275,APN_117-270.005 and 013_115-060-013 and 0151i egalsl22275-8-TCE.doex Page 2 of 2 100/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 42 EXHIBIT PARCEL'# 117-27©-00 ROUTE 91 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring ( ) Title to State 1 : l i 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 115-060-016 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C!L STATIONING 22275-8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 100 zC)a 400 ci00 PREPARED BY: SOMAS 3 Huth+ Centro orir. SIM, 700 Sonia ►no <afiforn.o 07707 t7141731-7373i(7s4,545-606;-(tax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA:OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R1V 91 6.9 1 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 43 w PARCEL# 22275 8 PEARL PROPOSED R/W S45°24'51'1W(R) TITLE TCE EXHIBIT H2 GRANTOR PEARL STREET PROP. P09.. L.OT 3; 191.00K 73 SOUTHRIVERSIDE LANE] ANb WA7Eit COMPANY MB ; 9/6 537658'42"W(R) "1 0 � �� I -- 0=05 57 39 R=283100': L=294 53'; 4,=15 18 37 R•=2843.00'` 17=759 69' AREA 11819 S4.F:T. DOD. NO 2006 056569 I 0,13,, APN' POR. SED71014 30 I.39 • R 6Wi FtAt4cHo E..L'' SOBRANTE MB 1/8 POL . I Doc. ND. 2006- D56569 } 0 . R CURVE DATA DELTA' RADIUS LENGTH C1 07°26109" I76.53' 22.91' C2 06°04'33" . 176.53' 18.72' LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning ; TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES',' Coordinates and bearings Ore on CGS 1983(2007.00i Zone 6. DistanCes Ond. stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore .in feet unless otherwise noted. ROUTE 91 L INE DATA SEARING DISTANCE' L1 L2 581 °26'22“E' N81°26'22HW : 83.19' 68.83' 360 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 22 7 - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0. 25 50 w A 100 I50 --, PREPARE© BY: PSOMAS 3 Nuton Centro Drive St.. 79a Santo Ana, California 47707 (714)751-7373/010345.8863 (fa.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA:OF540 FAe: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET Pal SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 44 EXIIIBIT PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SOFT, 117-270-005> & 013 PCL. 1 PICK. NO. 2006- POR. SECTION 30 0565691 CJ.ft. RANCHO RADIAL DATA EL SOBRANTE BEARING MB L'/a _ R.S. 63/66 '-- -._ -----.,. R1 R2 R3 S00°57'28"E_ S01°21`44"E S01 ° 22'25"E 1 N59°49'50"E --- _ 4 6.06 . "- -- -- .. _. _ -..- -- S02°35. 9"W ( j -` ®_ S711°24,i5° LQ R3 ©=05 57 39 ,----.....D 17, yE S87 22'34"E 1 C4 - - 7 66�.1 R / � . 9 9'� 222175.=.8 L3 Ilk L tir 2941.53' ! 759- cv A=15° 18'37" R-2843.00' '`' ��fk i- I— _ R1 4�2 w W UJ PROPOSED R/W C3 0 Itel w vWi L=581.97' ------ `'LN81 °40'38"W 123.1 5' EXISTING ,R/W LINE DATA CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH_ L3 L4 S02°37'26"W NO2° 37'26"E 10.98' 8.02' C3 C4 00°24'16" 05° 38'01 " "2839.00' 2831.00-' 20.04' 278.36', dik 40, ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Cil. STATIONING LEGEND P®6 Indicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (RI Indicotes Radial Bearing 363 2 ( ) Title to State i I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CC5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 % 5 -- TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMIENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: SOMAS HW ton Cash! 41r r, ' ,,,.i7 '-7$7311,1.15e5 ESlS Va.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: 0F540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV ., 91 6.9 3 -. 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 45 PARCEL# 22275-8 TITLE TCE GRANTOR PEARL ',STREET ::PROP. AREA 11819:SO.FT. APN SEE SHEET 3 POI?. SECT' ON:.20 T. dS. >' R.6W. 11 ANC; I-10 EL 80ERANTE N38 l /8 ...::. PO! . 1 DOC. N0 2006-• 0565691 O . fi, fi' S. 63/66 so - Sty PCL. 3 r .� DOC. NO. 2006-',. 0$6569 I O. R.. r 0- '26"E "' o.3g'S6" Mom' ® J� 2831:Ob% 1�=2843.Q0 PROPOSED R/W p :16° 40120" EXISTING R 759'69 POR LOT. ; .:I..2-A: . ,,. ASSESSORS MAP ya. NO. 1— , AM117 I /412- 43 Yam. PCL 4 am. No 4. 2006-� °56569 I t? , R . Sql ° 19,57,.E :�. 6.0 7o04'21':E" so 506° 44'59"E(VI/ L 5$1.g7 R.200 .00 ROUTE 91 365 LEGEND P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited C ) L. R1vERIDE tR R~2 b99` 0 5418 250 (R 31.00• N78��-.� :. °58•24 W FREEwAY. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/1. STATIONING 6 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6.Distances .and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. A11 distances ore, in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 22275 8' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P 5 © A 5 1 H rten Centrt 0rt4t Ste. 700 Sonia Ana, Californlo W707 (7,41)51-7373/014,545.8283.. 0010 DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET' Phi SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RI 91 6.9 4 4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 46 ��i y P R O O F O F M A I L I N G N O T I C E I , M a r g a r e t L . B a r n e s , a c t i n g o n b e h a l f o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n , h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t o n A p r i l 2 6 , 2 0 1 3 , I m a i l e d a c o p y o f t h e a t t a c h e d n o t i c e b y f i r s t - c l a s s m a i l t o t h e f o l l o w i n g o w n e r o f r e a l p r o p e r t y l o c a t e d i n t h e C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e , S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , m o r e p a r t i c u l a r l y d e s c r i b e d a s A s s e s s o r P a r c e l N o s . 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 , 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 5 , 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 , 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 7 a n d 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 1 3 ( C P N 2 2 2 7 5 ) : P e a r l S t r e e t P r o p e r t i e s , L L C 4 3 0 2 0 J o h n W a r n e r R o a d T e m e c u l a , C A 9 2 5 9 2 J o h n M u r p h y , E s q . M u r p h y & E v e r t z 6 5 0 T o w n C e n t e r D r i v e , S u i t e 5 5 0 C o s t a M e s a , C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 6 2 6 D A T E D : A p r i l 2 6 , 2 0 1 3 . R e c o r d O w n e r C o u r t e s y C o p y M a r g a r e t L . B a r n e s 1 7 3 3 6 . 0 2 1 0 0 \ 7 8 8 6 3 1 2 . 1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7934850.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: c� Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission l 7336.02 l00\7934850. l Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336,0210017935050.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EDIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caitrans Parcel No. 22249-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-01490% of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; theme North 08°00'04" East 3.98 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 32.84 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 33.25 feet along said southerly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 65 square feet. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. See Exhibit `AT attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2P7601050I1SURVEYLLEGALS122249 APN_117-070A291Lep11129249-1-Pee.doc 7f12l2012 Pale I oil EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 Ps OMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1:_ge4e44 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17- /2 P:\2PTG0105011SURV EYILEGALS122249_APN_ 117-070.0291Lega1sL22249-1-Fea.doc M 712012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL** TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-1 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 65 SO.FT. 117-070-029 `\� i 117-070-027 c N r � oro I - 50" i I } 1 k 1--- i I 0 ' 1 �3" 2 LLJ k i--- ! . 1 9 117- 0 70- 028 � ; Cr, O � o- 2 ? ,0' rj ��G�L 586°4210"E 281.76" I! I PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- I 0149096 O.R. �� r 3 1 z t .—. 1 Q i k ! - ! v.o i �� # 0 z 2 2n2�40 ' � i i i u i i� 1� 588° 46"39'�'� _ ---��� SEE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State Access Prohibited .1.11_1_1 NOTES 22249-1 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION - PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 kn,1 ton tent,. n.:..e Ste. 700 seora Ana, to.=tornia ;2707 17t+1751-7373.'014)545-8893 !roam DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAQ: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET Pig SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL** TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-1 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 65 SOS T. 117-070-029 ..1 n• to 0 Er.DOC.*2006- ti Cr; � _ ' e— W IT O p O .�a..� O Z ri 1+Y PARCEL "A" 0149096 O.R. I LS- 1 �� S ? , %, v 001. S84°20`56"E 32. 4' 2 1 M I ►� O t .- ,I,TIilitillill P06 � 33.25 °Ab'39"w ssa 284•40+ RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 2,224 9 - ROUTE 97 LEGEND POB Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ( ) NOTES I FEET 0 22249-1 FEE ACQUISITION Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1961(2007.00) zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 30 i�i. 5 10 20 PREPARED BY: P S O M A 1 ikaten Canr,e Driv® Ste. 200 Soma Aro CAriffornia S2707 '7,,05t • r3T]'i.ta3545-Bdi3 {roxi DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT r COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS a 8 R I V ._ 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `BP LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 CaBanns Parcel No. 22249-2 s r Fee Acquisition 6 APN 117-070-029 7 _ 8 9 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the to land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as it Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 12 13 s 14 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 13.93 is feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 53°07'31" East 16 16.51 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 46.41 feet to a point on the easterly line of said 17 land; thence South 08°03'13" West 55.78 feet along said easterly line to the Point of 18 Beginning. 19 20 21 22 23 24 See Exhibit 4152' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 25 26 27 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 28 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 29 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 30 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 31 Containing 125 square feet. PA2Ph3010501\SURVEVNLEGALS122249_APN_117-070-029U.optet22249-2-Fee.doc 7/12/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 2 3 4 5 PS CAMAS Prepared under the direction of 4ffiefi 6 f Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 8 9 10 11 12 y 13 14 15 16 17 0 18 19 9 Q 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 7 /2• f2 Date P:12PTG010501151iRVEV1EEGA1S\22249 APN_117-070-029U.egals\22249-2-Fee.doc 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-2 FEE HALF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 125 SOFT. 117-070-029 117-070-027 �F _ 1. 1 =c O rl 1 ,( P Nr es I I I I 50 I 4 I ( I l Li i I I CC t '2,117-070-028 I � i - __.. f r 9-1 �- ? ' ° ' XitCl -' ? / SW42'10"E 281.76' I; / I PARCEL "A" / DOG.#2006— i l 0149096 O.R. I t I Z ' f' \ `E I \ I I I „I "' = �— 1 a;© I i °�/ I -o 1(224 vy o— o — co z— ?O ' , i / i / POB I t t t t i s r f t► t l S88° 46'39 ,,� 284 ,40' SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State t t r t i Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-2 Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS v983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACOLIIS1TION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. i> ,imemsemoma FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hui ton centre D+-lee, Ste. 200 7707 (714i 5! to n�)731014�gJ5ABM (ro.3 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAst: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RI V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-2 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 125 SO.FT. 117-070-029 1 II7-070-028 1 50' I i '10 "E 281.76' ci I -- 586°42 1 l ! PARCEL "A" 1 DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. I :. rP Q ��°�� 3 ./3' I,�, 0 � l� �Ap , �� r—�� o 1 z4 i i i 1— 14.1 a; ct ti 0 v) j , i M z I MO � I I in 0 1 22-241 g2, N53°0 '31 "E 16151' 1' I ` Pos 13.93' "284.404 See 46'39 " r LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY PO8 Point of Beginning { } Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I ummilmaimumm FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Orire-Ste. ZOO Santo Mo C017forni0 7i1107 014)151-737)/t714l54s•9ee3 (Feel _ DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAu: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `CV LEGAL DESCRIPTION CaBrans Par}el No. 22;494 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 3.98 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the Tree Point of Beginning; thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 46.45 feet; thence South 01 °01' 15" East 4.30 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 14.45 feet along said southerly lime to a point thereon; thence North 84°20'56" West 32.84 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 269 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. (around distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the copses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PN30105011SURVEY1iEOA[S‘22249 APN_It7-070-029tep1s‘22249-3-PE.doc 7/12/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 PS OMAS 2 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 I 14 15 16 17 y 18 19 20 f; 21 t 22 ti 23 24 t. 25 1 26 27 28 r 29 30 i 31 Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7-a- /2 Date PA2PTG0105011SURVCMEGALS122249 APN_117-070-029ULegals122249-3-PE.doc 7,12I2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22249-3 PE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 269 SOFT. 117-070-029 . \` 117-070-027 1 I t1~ al c) r~ E 0Lu Of 1 1 1 P N" 1 ( 1 7 r r r,) '� l�+ 50' ! f I Lu 1~ I I .��� J 117w070-028 ( U j .-. w Q_ 0— o 0._ 0 �y' ' rt� �\i At 586°42'10"E 2$1.76i _ PARCEL "A" I I DOC.#2006— 1 0149096 O.R. 1 r 3 ` k z 1 j �, I Z "' I M: - j .72 �� j 0 0 i ` 2 TPOB _4' I i 1 1 1 1 ?�;2224 a4 _ 2 .40' _„ti W 1T '�� S8g° 46 39 -- _-'�--..., 5EE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE _91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning Poe Point of Beginning C } Title to State I i 1 t Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-e3 Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ( pEriaYslenome FEET 0 25 SO 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 14010. Celp+re Dr.w Ste. 100 (71:r,n3i71)ti1jS154ee9] MOO DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAte: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 EXHIBIT C2 FARCE Lit TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-3 PE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 269 SOFT. 117-070-029 ..1 Lu1 r ti . r- ,— 9-1y •Q 5.O 0 j 0149096 PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- ,O.R. 46 45` ,;. 2'.$4 t i' 1 1! #�1�1 - 1 23. 0 ' S A� ti� `� ` �) i - S01°01'15"E M Q 1N. — 4�: S84°20'56"E 1 1 { t1 �tli''I _ / O Z ", j----^- 5, T POB N84°20`56' L1 411! 1" i t i t t 1 l 1 I l l 1 H f i l 3.98' P06 ROUTE 284.40. S88° 46`39' 4 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND 7P08 POB True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ( ) t 1 1 1 1 NOTES 22249-3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT "` Coordinates dnd beorings ore on CCS 1993(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 30 5 10 20 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Dr;ve Ste. 200 421.0251-73T3/(71�n15 12707 BH33 (fat) DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET Phi SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `D1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. p249-4 Temporary Construction Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly comer of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 9.99 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 45.50 feet; thence South 01°01'15" East 6.04 feet; thence North 84°20'56" West 46.45 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 276 square feet. gee Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. (around distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:UPTG0105011SURVEYV,60ALS122249 APN 117470-0291Lega16222494-T'CEdoe 7/12/2012 Paul of EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 PSOMAS 2 `; Prepared under the direction of 3 6 x Brian E. Bullock, PL5 5260 7 8!. 9 10 11 12 g 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 i 7 /2- /2 Date P:t2PTG010501 \SUAYEMEGALS\22249_APN_ 117-070-029VLegaisr22249-4-TCE_doc 7/ 12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-4 TCE HALF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 276 SO.FT. 117--070-029 ` I 117-070-027 1 I 1_ � [r ,' ® 1 o 1 1 r 7(4 ° C,i 1 1 1 1 -� i I �35 50' I I i i i , i w i c r � 10 r 117-070-028 1 01 W ` 0- a 0- V . ti‘ ' ,�eGG�L 1 S86° 42'10"E 28136' , 1 PARCEL "A" 1 DOC.#2006- 1 j 0149096 O.R. �! r� !1� 3 1 i Z I •cI l in 1 QM 7r8 m� i 0 I co 0 `� (222:49 4 P � 4 CI ' z TPOB _ ..: t} l 588o 48 .3g�+W 284.4 2 �- -- �--,,,, SEE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning PO8 Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 < < l I Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-4 Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I immili4 -11111111111111111111111 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nuf tow Centre Drive Sic. 200 Sonia Ana, COlif Ornia 92702 oi4P51-7373.171a1545-an (ioxi DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 16 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-4 TCE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 276 SO.FT.y 117-070-029 1 i �� o I rn N PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. 1 r)� r` Y 4 ,V41 , N�G51� 10 3 0 1 N. 0 0 o O 0 - pit' 584°20'56"E 45.50' 6.01' _ � TPOB 6.04' _. — -- tV84°20`56"yy �46.45� l t t 1 1 t Lt l l t I l t 1 1 1 1 1) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 t l 1 1 1 1 1 o 1 l i l l l 1 i 9.99' -.-- S88°46'39„W 284.40' POB ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State lit 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-4 Coordinates and bearings are an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 5 10 20 30 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Nuttoo Centre Or,ve, 3,e, ?co 5.onlo na, Coit orrpty 9,707 ircx 17141 1- CO/./O415 -886 1 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF544 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 �/ R) Y 91 [ A v.4 2 ^] 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `El' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22249-5 Temoorary Construction Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March I, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°4639" West 13.93 feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning, thence South 88°4639" West 14.21 feet continuing along said southerly line to a point thereon; thence North 03°04'21" East 28.93 feet; thence South 86°28'44" East 24.04 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 63.02 feet to a point on the northerly line of said land; thence South 86°42'10" East 3.53 feet along said northerly line to the northeasterly corner of said land; thence South 08°03'13" West 33.65 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 10°35'59" West 46.41 feet; thence South 53°07'31" West 16.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 994 square feet See Exhibit 1E2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PTG010501%.S11RVEVVFAALSr22249 APN_I17-070.02911.epls122249-5-TCE.d°c 7/12/2012 Pap 1a2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 PSOMAS 6 7 8! 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 f 21 22 23 24 25 '! i 26 ! 27 28 29 30 31 Preaared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PIS 5260 Date r2- a P:12PTGRIRSOILSURVEYI4EGALS122249 APN 117.070-0291Legals\22249-5-TCE.doe 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL* TITLE . GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-5 TCE NAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 994 SOFT. 117-070-029 .,�� i 717-070-027 (.4 v v 0- in Ca��_2�o { 1 I r'\ I f (I 50' I I w I I w CC y 0 117-070-028 I V) . W Z ? . ° ' �fko� \ / 586° 42' i 0"E 281 .76' // ! PARCEL "A" / DClC.#2006— 0149096 O.R. 1 t ..... I i Q 1 1 i .— I I QM I a;° i i aoa 0 . o — o _ z (22249 : 1, 3 .�.� j /! I i POB �' r TPOB 284 _ _ .a0' 39„w 17171-1I1 -1 7- sSa° 46 SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning C ) Title to State 1 (1 t Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-5 Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Ho. tenire OrtCal rSvc Sit. 200 (7i.15- 73t3R3t4)5454B 63 (f0.1 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET Pm SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 f1 RIV 91 c 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-5 .. TCE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 994 SO.FT. 117-070-029 1 �' � 2 117-070-028 50 4 7r4° l 0"E 281 .76'_.----- 3.53' (.0 ( ---- S86°42'i ___ 1 N a PARCEL "A" � . DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. nCr in ci [^ 3 O,Iv 0 586°2$'44" '"24.04' M o , �o ; 2h � M 1— in lu i a; I—I i o 1 a , o V) 1 w (22249-5) �, j .- N re,' v 6� o0•1N °0,`h\ o ��AD z 4 1 .43 . (0' I P� P06 1 A.21 588046'39i11 284.40 TP0131 13.93' LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State i Li i i Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-5 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00i Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 t+utton Centre °rive. Ste. 200 {71•j75i 7373i(71.15i5.3 83 EraK) DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET Plot SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS 0 8 R I V n 7 1 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 21 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-070-029 (CPN 22249): HAGF Enterprises, L.P. 29484 Live Oak Canyon Road Redlands, CA 92373 Mark Sabbah Sabbah and MacKoul 116 North Vineyard Avenue Ontario, CA 91764 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Courtesy Copy Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7934850.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7910782.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGE LLP ,(1. By: al ' Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7910782.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7935081. I EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `AV LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca'trans Parcel No. 22111-1 Fee Acquisition APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 9; thence North 80°32'34" West 370.35 feet along the southerly line thereof to the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 9; said corner being the point of cusp with a curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 09°27'26" West; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Parcel 9 and said curve 82.05 feet through a central angle of 08°23'42" to a point thereon; thence South 80°32'34" East 33.25 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,990.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°30'39" West; thence easterly along said curve 174.22 feet through a central angle of 03°20' 19' ; thence South 86°49'39" East 82.22 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Parcel 9; thence South 09°28'52" West 29.02 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 4,478 square feet. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. PA2PTG0105011.SURVEYSLEGALS\22111_APN_102-020-044V.egalst22111-I_fee.doe Page 1 of 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PSOMAS 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Prepared under the direction of Yei,e/Lei /o - /0-/ Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS12211 l wAPN 102-020-044lLegals\2211l-1_Fee Joe PAge 2 of 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-1 FEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 4,478 SOFT, 102-020-044 s A i O, i. /` A 102-020-049 `fv' 0K/ O. T° �, P.M., 158/92-9b PARCEL 3 O s,+A / �`��- �., 9\'-' 4p�/ �� _ o 0=41 ° 24 `46" va R=559.99' `' -"--L=404.74' to v- et N o o co _..1 w t; Z �2`+ .-- -----" to PROP SE R!W -`cm P,M, 15a/92--96 to _ A \ -- -- 1 -- -~ a, -� ��2, N80° 32'3411W --_' -- ----__ 370.35' � --�'' POB ------- --- EXISTING R/W SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C!L STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing I ( ) Title to State 8 9 1 } 1 } Access Prohibited 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 1 FEE ACQUISITION distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. i pm....1 immommummomm FEET 0 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: R S O M A S 3 Hutton Centre Criva Ste. 200 Sony® Ara, C-rtifprni0 132707 (7t4}4tl-805317t4}545-0893 (Fox} DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 71 3.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-1 FEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 4,478 SO.FT, 102-020-044 a WARDLOW ^RpAQ_' P,Q.- 0 �,�'t. L1=08°23"42" \ a �� �cco R=559.99' �o L=82.05' N80°32'34"W 370.35' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY EX STING RIW BELOW LEFT w w ABOVE RIGHT \6.-03° 20' 19" R=2990.00 i — —L=174. 2' P, J, 15'8./92-96 PARCEL 9 PROPOSED R/w S86° 49'39"E N80°32'34"W 370.35' LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State till Access Prohibited 14 0.0 1 '---- Poe 102-020-045 ca LL1 L") a-. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on GCS 1983(2007,00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22111-1 FEE ACOU15fTION I r� ram■■moM FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PS a M A 5 3 Hutton Centro Drive, Ste. 200 Sonio Ano, California 02707 {7141481-8053/(7141545-8883 Vo.) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R1V 91 3.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS 4MA5 EXHIBIT `131' .LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22111-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside Cotmty, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of. said Parcel 9; thence North 09°28'52" East 29.02 feet along the easterly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 86°49'39" West 82.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,990.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 174.22 feet through a central angle of 03°20'19'; thence North 80°32'34" West 33.25 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 9, said point being the beginning of non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 01 °03'45" West; thence easterly along said northerly line and said curve 34.24 feet through a central angle of 03°30'12" to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,984.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06'29'47" West; thence easterly along said curve 173.11 feet through a central angle of 03°19'26"; thence South 86°49'39" East 82.88 feet to a point on said easterly line; thence South 09°28'52" West 6.04 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,632 square feet. See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. P:12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122111_APN_102-020-0441Legals!22111-2_PE.doe Page 1 of 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 . 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS O MAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983,.Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of ZZAdeirr.-4 M-/Q-tz Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date P:12PTG010501`SURVEYILEGALS122111_APN_102.020-044U.egals122111-2_PL'•.doc Page 2 (42 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-2 ESMT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,632 SO.FT. 102-020-044 r{ / O. /' / * 102-020-049 s� r\V' O , "° V 'I / � i * ' p; P.M, 153/92�-96 / Q''' '/ ' PARCEL 3 \1P `� G] .� ,� / . „V P -'"-- L.=41 °24'46' Q R=559.99' ----L-404.741 a- O N � o 1 0 0.1 nd I 1r ``•*\\ '` - P.M, Ise/ 1.2-96 £in -- a� ti� ��� �.....— \ -` — !� A 1 C P L 9 cv PROPOSED R/W _ ' 1 r� 1-- o (cP - - -" F,, .r - V) 1, -- N80°32'34" W 370.35' f _ -_ � - r r --- POB EXISTING R/W SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C/i- STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning IR) Indicates Radial Bearing I I ( ) Title to State (((l Access Prohibited 8 9 180 NOTES Coordinotes and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ( �� omm■mmum1uisi FEET 0 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive. Ste. 200 Santa 14j46iAna, Q057/ California714 (7SAS--B2B) (Fox) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V (] 91 3.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-2 ESMT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,632 SO.FT. 102-020-044 `-502°26'28"E(R) °'�� I- ROAD INARDL°W - _ - (R=559.991 ------•---- - __-0=03°30"12" 506°29'47"W(R) R=559.99 (R=2984.00') L-34.24' A=03°n'26" R 2984 00' L 173 1 1 _.. - -_ =03o 20`19" R-2990.00 L=174.2 1.1 J O J W CD Ili Qft N80° 32'34"W 501°03'45'1P 33.25' 506°30'39 W(R)EXISTING R!W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY _ CC W > ��Oy� w '0 0) �o �.`�, ��d F , Ill J 5-3/ )2 1v 440 IN.',)o h rar"l PARCEL } �O CV 0c.._...... l/1 `pp=p3° 19`26 ° 4939E 82 88 ` R=2984.00 L= i 73 1 1 r 586 _-. ,� _��- '.. .� -�N86° 49"39"W� a2.22 ` iv �P C3 6.04' T POB i atil Q N co —1 i� < A=03"20 19 PROPOSED RIM o' W La! R=2990.001 L=1 74.22' � ' fV . POB LEGEND P0B (ndicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning IR) Indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( }Title to State ) ) l l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet."`mmeam4 unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste, 200 Sang Ana, Coliforn:o 92707 0141481-8053!(7143543-8883 ,Fox) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.:10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FA1t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 3.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `CP LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22111-3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-020-044 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 9 of that certain Parcel Map fled in Book 158, Pages 92 through 96 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 9; thence North 09°28'52" East 35.06 feet along the easterly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 86°49'39" West 82.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,984.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 173.11 feet through a central angle of 03° 19'26" to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 9, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 559.99 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 02°26'28" East; thence easterly along said northerly line and said curve 116.13 feet through a central angle of 11 °52'54"; thence South 15° 11'56" East 26.13 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,981.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 04°09'24" West; thence easterly along said curve 51.21 feet through a central angle of 00°59'04'; thence South 86°49'39" East 83.21 feet to a point on said easterly line; thence South 09°28'52" West 3.02 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,907 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. P:12PTC0105011SURVEYTEGALS122111_APN_102-020-044lLegals\22111-3 TCE.doc Page l of l 0/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS The distances described herein arc grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 /d-/D-IZ Date PA2PTG010501LSURVEIALEGALS122111_APN_102-020-044U..egals122111-3 TCE.doc Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,907 SOFT. 102-020-044 ,� / o, r /' v moo. 102-020-049 Qr3Y , 'r0 \ s ..-v P,M, 158/ 92-96 0�, ` P; ()Vf f- ....!- PrrDEL ��(' 546.: . 0 . a=41 °24'40'� � R=559.99' -------`" - - --L = 4 04.7 4 ' ilw v 0 i o 1 o CO -a Ll Lt- JV� - - -- - crb o'L PROPOSE R /W ' OP s;-_� r ►■I�rrrl.n>rrr�+rwllrr• *>Ill�r�,lw► o r�_ _ � , . 0 � - " _ . ---- 1- `, N80 32'34 W 370.35' -�'}jJ'��pp 1 EXISTING RAN SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE LEGEND C/L STATIONING PO8 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (RI Indicates Radial Bearing I 1 1 ( ) Title to State 8 9 11 + I Access Prohibited 180 NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 1 1- 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 isi imimima FEET 0 30 60 120 180 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Orive, Ste. 200 d7t4)4(0 805347114)544-8883 (Fax) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 0 8 R I V 91 3.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 12 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22111-3 TCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA 1,907 SO.FT. 102-020-044 51 5° 1 1 '56"E "� 26.1 3' S02°26'28"E(R) _ -- - \ (R 559.99') 06•13 i-- ( L.L. __- - M 506 29 47 W(R) �9, 1-" „.AR} (R=2984.00') 6Q„ R-- •• 5�q ` ° °'1`� �1� WARDLOW ROAD 52 AA=03° 19'26" R=2984.00' L=1 73.11'-- -am-, - - eftemm w O LLJ w , ima( ( EXISTING R/W cn ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Ro �'° 1 R„,014 PAL J 58/92- 96 � W P PARCEL 9 tr 504°09'24"W R c�vo — o � o) Q o co i LL1 .o � I— 2 CC u.iN86' - ) v O 6.=00° 59'04" R=2981 .00' S86° 49'39'E 83.21 ' 3.02' L=51 .21' 49'39"W 82.88' TPOB � N 4 "A tl. m a ____ , p=03° 19' 6" � R=2984.00 L=173.11 0 PROPOSED R /W ,• W LA to - P08 LEGEND ROUTE 91 POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicotes Radial Bearing RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( }Title to State ) ) ) ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore an CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1.1. 1.- 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I— " FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 ttutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 2707 (7t1)491n E053471415498853(Fox) DATE: 07-17-2012 REV.: 10-09-2012 EA: OF540 FAA: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 3.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 13 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044(CPNS 2211): Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona ATTN: Dean R. Derleth, City Attorney Corona City Hall 400 South Vicentia Avenue Corona, CA 92882 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Margaret I. Barnes 17336.02100\7910782.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7934853.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: April 26, 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: \i-\Le/ it Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7934853.1 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Lot 2 of Tract No. 7432-1, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by Map on file in Book 86, Page(s) 7 and 8 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. APN:118-160-021-4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 1 Asevrtativ i a «ar+aar a. VI MI 4771 r f1MAaM TRACT 7132 • / ij+`tAe LA(• Ai USA At IRS r • 4liilYllA/ w rrww AINWP;, c.+ u�x+r r Jlalfd /1740 MAUI:"NO N.WirfAVI 71tY�Nr+* Q110I1R45GIiE/ PARCEL 1 P M. 19 /36 a*a a.• ar A. owiMMM.4 ' �•rw.rr / sir .tiMMr" aat a..ANY rrOY SOUTH R1VERS10E LAND BLOC K MN� Ts Mr-.Mrar'•' •». arsr /OMB /JAM► 4 LOT 9 I( Air �. *1 M rMY & WATER CO. 67 a M`alr LOT ;2 v *VAOT ! Ir ! 0100,0 00054411Mir AWYMAI KAMY+ rrr AMP r NW parr I SIMKO swMap IIa01urr � i r�rww . ��w *NI 1400 �rrr IP arei ' fitarS wig.MMaw WarierY - araMr"ilrev • amansit •rMal MOW /NO r.nM rr anw�► /awMrwMMM► wu .MMMr rr AMdMrM •Moor aMrl r If NC mall : EiNallor ` PARCEL 1 t • R 5. 34 l 100 . AA A'S Not AM Agarfore i a larr aw arrarov moot egerararK.w Jtarwl J Is AYM Air401 k ITHE ACRE TRN wi r.w � �A rYJ/•T MAP /5 FOA AsszsmitiIr Pt/0moms oae e 39Vel `tl 1181HX3 POR. C/TY OF CORONA P•.K 161/3/- 32 Parcel Map No.23869 P.N. /17/2 -23 Rorer/Mop + /.9449 P• 4i 38/35 1148 9✓6,899.kuth Riverside Led and Pk1 r Ca A�Q BS/7-8 Pact Na T43?-/ P. M. �e"� " 209'3 PM 80/ RM.186/48-49 23870 d1B84/6l,62 Tract NO.7/Q9 8-56 IR.A.004103 '/8 /f,,` +Arf tiff 040 /r +Alt J. JJ ,V4J, Jr A,T/ 44.01 4r Jx J/;fr tJ. Y J$4+44 44 ♦} t/ u4t J/It Jt 44 44. 10 V 40•JD r/ r/IVO, c " M44 4A40 4.04 AAA!, *Cr 40. Js J4+t rJ-44 44 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 118-160-021 (CPN 22192): Kenneth James Tressen 2805 Mount Niguel Circle Corona, CA 92882 Sharon Ann Tressen 2805 Mount Niguel Circle Corona, CA 92882 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Record Owner Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7934853.1 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER OF CONTINUED HEARING Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7886310.1 e California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: April 26, 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: ,aW� Y 11 ,n 1�� Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7886310.1 File No: 12002670 EXHIBIT "A" All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 3 of Trinidad Yorba Tract, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 2 p 22 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to W.I. Hollingsworth by deed from the State of California, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995 of Official Records; thence along the Easterly boundary of said parcel North 9° 25' 50" East 237.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through an angle of 109° 46' 50" a distance of 47.90 feet to Course "A"; thence along Course "A" North 81° 08' 21" East 355.94 feet to the Easterly terminus of that certain curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 343.00 feet in the Southeasterly line of that portion of land condemned by the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records; said point also being on the Westerly boundary of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Ray N. Woods, et ux, by deed recorded May 12, 1961 as Instrument No. 40636, of Official Records; thence Southwesterly along said curve from a tangent bearing of South 78° 51' 44" West through an angle of 69° 25' 54" a distance of 415.65 feet; thence South 9° 25' 50" West parallel with said Easterly boundary 51.48 feet; thence North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That portion of the North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street which would ordinarily pass with a conveyance of Parcel 1 described above, as vacated by Resolution No. 82-115 of the City Council of the City of Corona, recorded January 28, 1983 as Instrument No. 18074, of Official Records, Riverside County records, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the land described in the Director's Deed to W.I. Hollingsworth, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the tangent portion of the Easterly line of Exhibit A, Page 1 File No: 12002670 said land of Hollingsworth, South 9° 25' 50" West 44.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 13.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" an arch distance of 20.42 feet to the Southerly line of said North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street; thence along said Southerly line South 80° 34' 10" East to the Southerly prolongation of that certain course having a bearing and length of "South 9° 25' 50" West 51.46 feet" in the Southeasterly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the last mentioned prolongation North 9° 25' 50" East 57.00 feet to said Northerly line of the North 57.00 feet of the West Sixth Street; thence along said West Sixth Street North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 102-270-010 Exhibit A, Page 2 ?.`"..1= ASSESSOR'S MAP the t0s AG. 27 R/vERSiDE COO.' C4L/F POR. r s R.7 W. ( PcR. RO LA sredreR4 YOR8.4) ' :I 1 F. I i\--• /1 srArE t.P1.22."."41.N.,• WCST Nwy 0 9 T R 4 .106' , l'ef 2/22 rein/dad rcr2u non' PM. 117/100-101 Rarcei Moo 19J94 1.2?4 / 02-2r 44.1 01. ea JPOr ...II at* • Exhibit A, Page 3 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-270-010 (CPN 22111): Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc. 1805 West 6th Street Corona, CA 92882 Charles S. Krolikowski Newmeyer & Dillion LLP 895 Dove Street, 5th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Courtesy Copy Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7886310.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most. compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7934851.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`1Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: April 26, 2013. Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER P By: Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7934851.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive, temporary easement to engage in construction and related activities for the project, including the right to deposit tools, implements, and materials, and together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7935577.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `AI' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22153-1 Fee Acquisition APN 118-040-021 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Grant Deed recorded July 30, 2008 as Document No. 2008- 0417177 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said land; thence South 79°39'03" West 307.31 feet along the general southerly line of said land to a point thereon; said point being the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 166.00 feet; thence westerly along said general southerly line and said curve 123.70 feet through a central angle of 42°41'44" to a point thereon; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 172.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 24°27'44" West; thence easterly along said curve 104.51 feet through a central angle of 34°48'54"; thence North 79°38'49" East 320.35 feet to a point on the easterly line of said land; thence South 16°03'48" East 13.30 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 4,959 square feet. ee Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2P'fG0105011SUR V E Y\LEGALS122I53_APN_ 118-040-0211Legals122153- I-Fee.doc 11/14/2012 Page I oft EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PS OMAS Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122153_APN_11 R-040-02111,egais\22153-1-Fee.doc 11/14/2012 Page 2 of EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA APN 22153-1 FEE 4,959 SO.FT. 118-040-021 118-040-0201 - LOT 49 LOT 50 .� r 18-040-019 ,c0 21'E PDL , 033 N10 a� 1i8,0A0" P 11.4, r 18-040-022 TRACT NO, 10896 o LOT 52 M..a, 96181-05 - LOT 51 m. PCL 2 f c^ et,`') .<2• DOG. NO. 2008- U4 J I 1 / I O.R. CURVE TABLE ? o o o co `4`' C1 = A=42°41144" R=166.00' L=123.70' �'' M. C2 = 6=34°48'54'. R=172.00' L=104.511 s_ oh) RADIAL TABLE AR1=532°20'47.0/ (R=166.00') 13.30' 1351 1,\ q (i) ^; --- 0 �at o OSE© a'w 320.3 v poop “v..% s �ni o 38 A9 N ._ 1A19 n' C 2 ` 03 W 519° 3 �- o 0 'Qp G r 5 "A � 1:5 I QPs ♦� EW A RE � 40 55-56 ,, 2 IN �� r f7�R�ir1-' � 3QSi °'Z r f�JG1` 102 26- S0 6=53°12'121' �� 9� 9 r '' — R-166.00' Qv �- L=154.14' R q�aSi�ION\NG LEGEND $ 9� S� P (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning U1� .) a0 �4,40 V - ( ) Title to State 1 1 t 1 1 Access Prohibited 6 NOTES 2 2153-1 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. �1 $111011111181111Emomm FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hurfon Cenfre Orive S+e. 200 Sonia Ano, Colifornio 92707 t71417Si 7373t(714)5a5-99E3 (Fait DATE: 07-31-2012 REV. 11-14-2012 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS $ R I V 9 1 4.5 1 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE PS OMAS 1 EXHIBIT 9B1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22153-2 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 118-040-021 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, being a portion of the 9 land described in that certain Grant Deed recorded July 30, 2008 as Document No. 2008- to 0417177 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: tt 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said land; thence North 16°03'48" West 13.30 13 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 79°38'49" West 14 308.63 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 79°38'49" West 11.72 feet to 15 the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 172.00 feet; thence 16 westerly along said curve 36.36 feet through a central angle of 12°06'47'; thence North t 7 01 °45'36" East 10.00 feet; to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 18 having a radius of 162.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 01°45'36" West; 19 thence easterly along said curve 34.25 feet through a central angle of 12°06'47"; thence 20 North 79°38'49" East 11.72 feet; thence South 10°21'11" East 10.00 feet to the True 21 Point of Beginning. 22 23 Containing 470 square feet. 24 25 See Exhibit 132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 26 27 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 28 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 29 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 30 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 31 P 12PTG410501 SURVEY\LEGALS122153_APN_118-040-0211Legals122153-2-TCE.doe 1 1/14/2012 Page I or2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS OMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1l 14 Date PA2PTG010501kSURVEYV.EGALS122153_APN_118.040-0211Lega1s122153-2-TCE doc 11/14/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL* TITLE AREA A P N 22153-2 TCE 470 SOFT. 118-040-021 118-040-020 LOT 49 LOT 50 1 �� 118-040-019 1g ,21'� PCL , 3 053 OQo' N1,,° A6 1 $- s�/�, 118-o4o-oz2 -TRACT NO. 10896 0 L J O!' 52 M,$, 76131-8 LOT 51 �- ��) t'i; ti6 .h' DOC. NO. 2008-0411111 O.R. � CURVE TABLE a N in a o Po t �° ''�" C1 = 0=12°06'47" R=172.00' L=36.36' `:' � C2 = 0=12°06'47" R=162.00' L=34.25' 040 LINE TABLE 1 3.30" �v- `4 L1 -- N01°45'36"E(R) 10.00' �/W , v- , qg" E pROpOSE� "t Q3 0 v iiiii 3 _ i '4 / OCio N1 g� - 2 „E ' C =a ° 2� 1 A 1 30S ,65 ? Q8 .� �`.. 1 ��� O�5�q C- 5'—IPA" P � �' ‘p32 � fir-- C 2 Li C 7 0=53° 5'001 p .00 „W S� 9° 3g' 49 �' ' `1 Sig• 3$-A9S�9°3g 03 � w �- 12' � z"� IVER R � 4►'r� �Qi .31 ar�rA �_ Y SI � 02-280. _ !' R=166.00' k - L=1 54.14' 9 9 LEGEND ROUE X. (R) Indicates Radial Bearing TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Paint of Beginning e 1`IE� LpN\ 91 R 51 P 'fOl0 p`( C VR�-�� ( ) Title to State ill 1 t Access Prohibited 6 NOTES 22153-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I ii FEET 0 40 60 160 240 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Dri,e, Ste. 200 Santo Ana, COlifornio 927D7 (71ty75t-7373it7talSaS-8883 (Fox) DATE: 07-30-2012 REV. 11-14-2012 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 ^-R I V 91 1 4.5 - 1 1 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `C1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22153 3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 118-040-021 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Grant Deed recorded July 30, 2008 as Document No. 2008- °417177 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence North 16°03'48" West 13.30 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 79°38'49" West 14.44 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 79°38'49" West 48.83 feet; thence North 10°21'11" West 10.00 feet; thence North 79°38'49" East 48.83 feet; and thence South 10°21'11" East 10.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 488 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG0105011SUR VEYILEGALS122153_APN_I 18-040-0211Legals122153.3-TCE.doe 11/l4/2012 Page I oft EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 l t 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS 4MAS Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PT60105011SUR VEY1LEGALS122153_APN_ 118-040-0211Lega1s122153-3-TCE.doc 11/I4/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA APN 22153-3 TCE 488 SOST. 118-040-021 -- "-- LOT 49 I I8-040-020 LOT 50 9 118-040-019 ,91 ,23''� PGL .13 p33 �10 11$.OA(Y ` 1:34'114, �� ��-9 I18-040-022 TRACT NO, 10896 6'° J LOT 52 M,S. 96/81 `85 ,I` col_ F'GL, � LOT 5 1 0 �: �� , ^c1• DOG. NO, 2JJc3- Jai J I 1 I I D R > A., o�' " N r, o 0 o co ti — o h oh ` =b. E 13.30' �a co a03 N� 9° 3ga39 4$ 400 O \y 0° 2� + 0, W ii, p R /W N1 � 0 '0 g .g, pR5� �9 3St 49yW 450 , ' A.A4, rrr�►* • 5 ° ' 030 8' Ac) rrr S� rrrrr '1 s3 190 �� 5/ o'�q 5 6 , L1O .-7-?`.7D r �i� 5564 W- 8 _032 - r r vr r r G �/� WAY �"„ _, e o_ EXXS3lN 0 1C- 24c �'- A=53° 1 2'12�� Rt\ERS1D 102-2 ;- R-166.00' 9� 9 -- r L=154.14' LEGEND OU�� R Vi t9lpNtN0 (R) Indicates Radial Bearing TPOB True Point of Beginning P08 Point of Beginning a x Ix L1�� g1 CA' S� i (�O �yp�t 1; ik c ) Title to State ( ( I I I Access Prohibited 6 NOTES 2 2 1 5 3 3 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless Otherwise noted. ( imasimmommt FEET 0 40 80 160 240 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Orive, Ste, 200 (71Jj751-°i37 iM 415 8883 (Fox) DATE: 07-30-2012 REV. 11-14-2012 EA: OFS40 l:A3t: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 w.uw.� R I V w ar9_.... 1 4. 5 1 1 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 118-040-021 (CPN 22153): Nancy A. Nicola 1731 Pomona Road Corona, CA 92880 Warren H. Lampkin 1731 Pomona Road Corona, CA 92880 DATED: April 26, 2013. Record Owner Record Owner Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7934851.1 INDIAN WELLS (760) 568-261 1 IRVINE (949) 263-2600 LOS ANGELES (2 1 3) 61 7-8 100 ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, P.O. BOX 1028, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 PHONE: (95 1) 686-1450 I FAx: (95 1) 686-3083 vmv BBKLAW.COM MARGARET L. BARNES (95 I ) 826-8357 MARGARET. BARNES@B BKLAW . COM April 1, 2013 SACRAMENTO (91 6) 325-4000 SAN DIEOO (619) 525-1300 WALNUT CREEK (925) 977-3300 WASHINOTON, DC (202) 785-0600 Jennifer Harmon VIA HAND DELIVERY Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission D rI d -, 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor c, Riverside, California 92501 Re: Original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners of Resolution of Necessity Hearing Scheduled for May 8, 2013 T RIVERSIDE COUNTY RCTC/SR91 Capital Improvements Project ° RANSPORTATION COMMISSION Property Ownership: Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., APN 102-270-010 Property Ownership: Pearl Street Properties, LLC, APNS 115-060-013, 117-270-005, 117-270-007 and 117-270-013 Dear Jennifer: Attached is the original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners, with proofs of mailing, of the hearing on the Resolution of Necessity which is scheduled for May 8, 2013. The original Notices were mailed on March 29, 2013. It will be necessary for you to note the proof of mailing of the Notices at the hearing. The remaining documents needed for the hearing (Resolutions of Necessity, Agenda Report, Memorandum from Legal Counsel) have been provided in draft form to Gina Gallagher for her review and revision. She will provide the finalized versions to you priodr to the hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, Ad -A: oti Margaret L. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachment copy: Gina Gallagher, Senior Right of Way Agent (w/copy of Attachments, via e-mail only) 45774.20010\7893300.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the transportation project and other related uses for the SR91 CIP Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "1," attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7886310.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: , 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP B ark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7886310.1 Fite No: 12002670 EXHIBIT "A" All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 3 of Trinidad Yorba Tract, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 2 p 22 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to W.I. Hollingsworth by deed from the State of California, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995 of Official Records; thence along the Easterly boundary of said parcel North 9° 25' 50" East 237.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through an angle of 109° 46' 50" a distance of 47.90 feet to Course "A"; thence along Course "A" North 81° 08' 21" East 355.94 feet to the Easterly terminus of that certain curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 343.00 feet in the Southeasterly line of that portion of land condemned by the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records; said point also being on the Westerly boundary of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Ray N. Woods, et ux, by deed recorded May 12, 1961 as Instrument No. 40636, of Official Records; thence Southwesterly along said curve from a tangent bearing of South 78° 51' 44" West through an angle of 69° 25' 54" a distance of 415.65 feet; thence South 9° 25' 50" West parallel with said Easterly boundary 51.48 feet; thence North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That portion of the North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street which would ordinarily pass with a conveyance of Parcel 1 described above, as vacated by Resolution No. 82-115 of the City Council of the City of Corona, recorded January 28, 1983 as Instrument No. 18074, of Official Records, Riverside County records, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the land described in the Director's Deed to W.I. Hollingsworth, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the tangent portion of the Easterly line of EXHIBIT 1, PAGE 1 File No: 12002670 said land of Hollingsworth, South 9° 25' 50" West 44.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 13.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" an arch distance of 20.42 feet to the Southerly line of said North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street; thence along said Southerly line South 80° 34' 10" East to the Southerly prolongation of that certain course having a bearing and length of "South 9° 25' 50" West 51.46 feet" in the Southeasterly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the last mentioned prolongation North 9° 25' 50" East 57.00 feet to said Northerly line of the North 57.00 feet of the West Sixth Street; thence along said West Sixth Street North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 102-270-010 EXHIBIT 1, PAGE 2 POR. T. 3S. R.714! (POR. RO LA SIERRA YORBA1 TR,, A 406 9-32-/ 102-27 — 30 �- o•r.•�l ais. seen ASSESSOR'S MAP RX /02 PG. 27 RIVERS/DE COLWTY CALIF .,r N Wy 91 s. M,B. 2/22 Trinidad Y rn° Tract I p PM. 1/7//00-/0/ Parcel Map /9394 '�Rf NO.. /377 �. EXHIBIT 1, PAGE 3 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Frances White, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on Friday, March 29, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-270-010: Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc. Record Owner 1805 West 6th Street Corona, CA 92882 Charles S. Krolikowski Courtesy Copy Newmeyer & Dillion LLP 895 Dove Street, 5th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 DATED: March 29, 2013. eieR iJ Frances White 1733 6, 02100\78 86310.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the, Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement, permanent access easement, permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the transportation project and other related uses for the SR91 CIP Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "1," attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 17336.02100\7886312.1 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, ri Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST B,TST & KRIECrER LLP Bv: r \\1( A. k\AEaster Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7886312.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to ROTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Access Easement" refers to an non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction site, as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC, shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent of RCTC. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours 1733 6.02100\7888203.1 after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Utility Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual easement, to relocate, construct, operate, use, maintain, alter, add to, reconstruct, enlarge, repair, renew, replace, inspect and/or remove, at any time and from time to time, underground utilities, including but not limited to sewers, water, electrical systems and communication systems, consisting wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholds, and including above -ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and/or other purposes, in, under, on, over, along and across the land, as determined necessary by RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC, will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. 17336.02100\7888203.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °40'38" West 19.65 feet continuing along said general southerly line to the beginning of a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 15.87 feet through a central angle of 36°21'56'; thence South 81 °26'22" East 29.38 feet to a point on said westerly line, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 52°17'05" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 130 square feet See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. P:\2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275_APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-1-Fee.docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 PSOMAS 1 2 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 3 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's right or access, appurtenant to 4 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 5 6 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 7 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 8 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 9 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 10 11 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 15 16 �. 1O-/7/2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-1-Fee.docx Page 2 of 10/17/2012 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 130 S0. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 " 7-270_004 6 A• T •&S.F R.R . 119-3pp-p21 ,• 115-060-016 1` N — — ---- - I 4 PCL , 2 I DOC . NO, 2006- 0565691 OR.. PCL , 1 aeL ____ --- 117-270-0061------ -"1-------,_' .�-S. PCL. 4 --------------------------- �' I N81 40'30"►y r® 63 — ------- /6 6------ ______.r r -. - . r:'� 1-� r r r 212.14 �0 POB - 22,275=1 TPOB 365 I SHEET 2 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING ''Ci. LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5- 1 FEE ACQUISITION distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. ( FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Sonto Ano Coiifernio 92707 (714)751-7373/(7141545-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V (] 7 1 6.9 1 2 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-1 FEE PEARL STREET PROP 130 SO.FT. 117-270-007 POR ., LOT 3; FiLOCIC 73 SOUTH RlV RS1Dr LAND AND UTATr R CONIPANY 30, MB 9/6 i 1-. l) tu Lij S� o° AZ Q, W (,) PCL 2 1 ..,4 w DOC, NO., 2006-0565691 O,R, / .rc Zo l� M , Q. O r- 1 0 "' o� '� , 0° 1 z �, 0 ��,� Oa A=89°51 ,1q„ — _ , _ v` 6' R_ 25,0p' —"; mod,_ _ _ _ _ ,�`Q`1 39. 21 c' , O, 4; 00 1 _ s Sg4o ►_ S87 °�6 ,22 ,'.sue- -- Sh`L Shy 47 �18�W(R `�� -� rg 38 E — _ _ =36 21 'S6" R=25.00' 1g,=6.gb =15,8�. N81 °4038„W 1=206.53' N81 o4p,38„W 1 .. TpoB 2 7 2. 7 q - 14014SED R/W LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ) Title to State I I 1 I t Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 / 5 - 1 FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 tp 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonto Ano, Colifornio 92707 (714)751-7373/P141545-H83 (Fox) DATE:6-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 2 PS OMAS EXHIBIT 131' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-2 5 Fee Acquisition 6 APN 115-060-013, 015 and 117-270-005, 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28"; thence South 81 °26'22" East 57.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 21 northerly having a radius of 2,851.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 767.34 feet 22 through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence North 41 °20'45" West 18.21 feet to the 23 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,837.00 feet, to 24 which point a radial line bears South 06°38'56" East; thence easterly along said curve 25 165.85 feet through a central angle of 03°20'58"; thence North 02°32'29" East 95.94 feet 26 to a point on the general northerly line of said Parcel 4, said point being the beginning of 27 a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 5,779.66 feet, to which point a 28 radial line bears South 13°11'22" West; thence easterly along said northerly line the 29 following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 76.62 feet through a central angle of 30 00°45'34" and 2) South 77°34'12" East 140.88 feet to the northeasterly corner of said 31 Parcel 4; thence South 09°22'38" West 73.97 feet along the general easterly line of said PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275_APN_117-270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-2-FEE.docx 10/9/2012 Page 1 of 3 PSOMAS t Parcel 4 to the southeasterly corner thereof and the beginning of a non -tangent curve 2 concave northwesterly having a radius of 1,950.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears 3 South 18°23'16" East; thence westerly along the general southerly line of said Parcel 4 4 and along said curve 199.21 feet through a central angle of 05 °51' 11 " to the most 5 southerly corner thereof, also being a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 3; 6 thence South 41 °19'57" East 15.92 feet along said northeasterly line to the most easterly 7 corner of said Parcel 3; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 3 North 78°58'24" 8 West 131.00 feet to the most easterly comer of said Parcel 1, said point being the 9 beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 2,000.00 feet, to to which point a radial line bears South 08°20'59" East; thence westerly along the southerly l l line of said Parcel 1 the following two (2) courses: 1) along said curve 581.97 feet 12 through a central angle of 16°40'20" and 2) North 81 °40'38" West 123.15 feet to the 13 Point of Beginning. 14 15 Containing 51,953 square feet. 16 17 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 18 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 19 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 20 21 See Exhibit 132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on Califomia Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 25 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 27 28 29 30 31 P:12PTG0105011SURVEYkLEGALSk22275_APN_117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015ULegals122275-2-FEE.docx 10/9/2012 Page 2 of 3 PSOMAS 1 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /0 - 09-/Z Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-2-FEE.docx Page 3 of 10/92012 — — — EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-3 & 015 117-270-010-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 ,,7,27p Ooa o � _ SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 f A•T•4s.F• R•R � ,� SHEET 2 ,, 115-060-016 9-300-021 /• er ,(n ;JCL, 2 IQ I DOG. NO. 2006-056569110,R, I PCL, 1 t~ F� I �'C/�.` �_ _ _) - 117-270� 006 b3./bb - -- PCL. s 4 -- ------------------i , , � -- --- --------- -_;- _---------I------ =.==-- _- �, J J ___1_ �.94) P0B 222'75-2 65 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State II 1 I !Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain �J 2 2 2 / 5 - 2 FEE ACOUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonfo ' (714)7Si-7373/(714)545-B883 (Fax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 - 6.9 1 5 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 FOR. LOT � SOUTH RIVERSIDE Lu AND WATER MS N � u Q. , -- — � o— — — 1111'1::::,:mmir ....�..� 3 • BLOCK 73 LAND COMFANY 9/b FOR, FCL, 2 DOC, NO, 200b- 0565691 O.R, A=02°51128" R=176.53' —L=8.81'------- S81°26'22"E — 57.22' =1 5°25'16" �a — - °40'384 - — R=2851 FOR, SECTION 30 T'3RA R'blld' NCHO ELSOSRANTE MD 1/8 FCL, 1 DOC NO, 2006- — 0565691 O,R, — ------ R,S. 63/66 .00' L=767.34' _ -- M F- w uJ .3:- Q N81 161 .21 ' PROPOSED R/W� 0 3 -' °40'38"W; cn N81 v EXISTING R/W POB 123.15 w �o o op w (n n Ao 0) ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing 9 360 ( )Title to State 1 1 1 l 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 2 FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 (71a1751-7 COlifo41545-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 5 " E X H I B I T B 2 P A R C E L # T I T L E G R A N T O R A R E A A P N 2 2 2 7 5 - 2 F E E P E A R L S T R E E T P R O P . 5 1 , 9 5 3 S O . F T . 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 & 0 1 5 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 & 0 1 3 c \ J w _ w w N - P O R , S E C T I O N 3 0 L S L I D R R A N C H O M S ) 8 E / R , S , 6 3 / 6 6 ' _ _ ` - _ 7 - ����- - / / - - _ - �� 0 = 1 5 � 2 5 ' 1 6 " R = 2 8 5 1 . 0 0 ` 1 7 D O C , 0 5 6 5 6 9 1 1 0 2 0 0 6 - 1 0 , R , P R O P O S E D R / W w w 0 �� - - - - _ _ _ _ - �� - - ` L = 7 6 7 3 4 L ; - , F I T - I N 8 1 - - ' - 0 = 1 6 � 4 0 ' 2 0 " � 4 0 ' 3 8 " W 1 2 3 . 1 5 ' R = 2 0 0 0 . 0 0 ' E X I S T I N G R / W L = 5 8 1 . 9 7 ' F R E E W A Y ( - 2 2 2 7 5 - 2 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E R O U T E 9 1 2 C / L S T A T I O N I N G 3 6 3 L E G E N D P O B I n d i c a t e s T P O B I n d i c a t e s ( R ) I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g R a d i a l B e a r i n g ( ) T i t l e t o S t a t e I I I I ( A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d N O T E S F E E T 2 2 2 / 5 - 2 F E E A C Q U I S I T I O N I C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e a r i n g s o r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 . D i s t a n c e s a n d s t a t i o n i n g a r e g r i d d i s t a n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 9 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t a i n g r o u n d d i s t a n c e s . A l l d i s t a n c e s o r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . 1 5 0 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 P R E P A R E D B Y : P S O M A S 3 H u f t o r C e n t r e D r i v e , S t e . 2 0 0 S a n t a r ( 7 1 4 ) 7 5 1 7 3 7 3 / ( 7 1 4 ��) 5 4 5 - 8 8 9 3 ( F o x ) D A T E : 0 6 - 1 5 - 1 2 R E V . : 1 0 - 0 9 - 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 F A * : D I S T R I C T C O U N T Y R O U T E S H E E T P M S H E E T N O . T O T A L S H E E T S 8 R I V 9 1 6 . 9 3 5 EXHIBIT B2 ' PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 M F— w w N w w POR. SECTION 30 T,3S.; R,6W, RANCHO EL SODRANTE MS 1 /8 PCL , 1 DOC, NO. 2006- 0565691 D.R. PROPOSED R/41 p=16° 40'20" R.S. i i 6„E �R), i i 41°20 45 N/ N 18.21 R=2851 .00� L=761 •34 PCL, 3 DOC, NO. 200 0565691.„0.R, 6b PCL, DOC, NO, 0565691 508° � R/W FREEWAY 222275-2 EXIST INSIDE FREE 91 RISER R��TE ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING '-POR. LOT. 12-A- ASSESSOR'S MAP NO. 31 ANIS 1 /42-'13 2006- O,R, 4=03° 20'58� ' R=2837 .00/ L=165•85 137.00'_ N78°58,244 R=2p00. 6 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radiol Bearing C ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited SEE SHEET NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S DATE:06-15-2012 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa Ano, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)945-8E83 (Fox) 8 RI 91 6.9 4 5 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-2 FEE PEARL STREET PROP. 51,953 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 v I— w w V) w w c/) S1301 j '224 (R) R-_5�745�3q„ 9.66 =76.62, 131 .00, N7g°58'24"W s �S 9> o . 9� / sue, F LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited A. T . & S.F. R.R. PROPOSED Raw 34 "12 E 140.88" R 9 F REE1 PY v�RSipE Ri 1E 9 3� 0 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CAL STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22275-2 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonia Ana, Coiifornio 92707 (714)7E1-7373/(714)54E-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `C1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-3 Permanent Wall Footine Easement APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 6.96 feet through a central angle of 01 °55'52" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81 °26'22" West 29.38 feet to a point on the general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 44°41'18" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said general southerly line 10.77 feet through a central angle of 24°40'57" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 28.54 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 55°24'29" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 11.26 feet through a central angle of 03°07'25" to the True Point of Beginning. PA2PTG010501\SURVEYTEGALS\22275_APN_117-270-007\Legals\22275-3-PE.docx Page 1 of 10/17/2012 I 2 3 PSOMAS Containing 235 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 4 5 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 6 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 7 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 8 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 9 ]0 11 Prepared under the direction of 12 13 14 15 6faged -0./Z 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-3-PE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/ 17/2012 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-3 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 235 SO. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-27o-ooll 777-270-004 o I-...., . FR. R. nL Li119-300-027 115-060-016 Cc n � N — — — —IDOC. oc PCI 2 I NO, 2006-056569J 0,R, PCL . 1 Pei. 11 7-270-006 I - r?, PCL. rr ----TPOB-1-------------- s.. 63/ " - ---------66------ "" __-- N81 °4 212.14' -_ 'a --- O 3 POBIt I , 22275-3) ' 365 � SHEET 2 j 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CAL STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Rodiol Beoring ( ) Title to Stote J 1 l 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 / 5 - 3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distonces. All distonces ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Huttor Centre Drivel Ste. 200 C714).51n 7373!'17�14)545-8883 ('0.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 `) RI V 91 (� 6.9 1 2 " E X H I B I T C 2 P A R C E L # T I T L E G R A N T O R A R E A A P N 2 2 2 7 5 - 3 E S M T P E A R L S T R E E T P R O P 2 3 5 S O F T . 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 7 i C U R V E D A T A R A D I U S D E L T A L E N G T H 3 0 ' C l 2 5 . 0 0 ' 2 4 � 4 0 ' 5 7 " 1 0 . 7 7 ' C 2 2 0 6 . 5 3 ' 0 3 � 0 7 ' 2 5 " 1 1 . 2 6 ' R A D I A L D A T A B E A R I N G L Q ��, w �� R 1 5 6 9 � 2 2 ' 1 4 " W � C t S �� 0 U P G L 2 J L i D O C , N O 2 0 0 6 - 0 5 6 5 6 9 1 0 , R , C D o t i v v �� P O R , L O T 3 ; D L o n 1 3 ��' o N T - D , S O U T H R I V E R S I D E L A N D I c o i n o � �� O �� �� ` A N D W A T E R C O M P A N Y z ����, J , 0 1 M B 9 / 6 o ` �� �� o �� 7 " , 5 - 6 ' 2 2 1 A = 8 9 � 5 1 , 1 q i L . 1 7 : R _ 2 5 . 0 0 ' R 1 ` J o b _ � 2 Q ��A ) 3 g " 2 1 " S 8 7 8 . 5 4 , E " ` s u e - ���� ` L � \ w C P . \ 4 j . ' C l - " - < 2 8 5 q ��' t i � ` L - e ` " �� ��. , . , $ ��' S R O _ - _ . S 4 4 � 4 1 ' 7 8 " W ( R ) \ � - ` p _ 5 , P 7 - R = 2 0 6 5 3 5 2 _ _ _ ' 7 9 . 6 5 ' v L = 6 . 9 6 , 2 2 2 7 5 : : , N 8 1 � 4 0 ' 3 g 4 N 8 1 � 4 0 ' 3 8 4 T P O S 2 1 2 . 1 4 " - , P R O P O S E D R / W L E G E N D P O B I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g T P O B I n d i c a t e s T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g ( R ) I n d i c a t e s R a d i a l B e a r i n g R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y ( ) T i t l e t o S t o t e I I I I L A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d N O T E S C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e a r i n g s a r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 . D i s t a n c e s a n d s t a t i o n i n g o r e g r i d d i s t a n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 9 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t a i n 2 2 2 / " ' J c J - 3 P E R M A N E N T W A L L F O O T I N G E A S E M E N T g r o u n d d i s t o n c e s . A l l d i s t a n c e s o r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . I F E E T 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 P R E P A R E D B Y : P S O M A S 3 H u t t o n C e n t r e D r i v e , S t e . 2 0 0 S o n i a A n a , C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 7 0 7 ( 7 1 4 ) 2 5 1 - 7 3 2 3 1 2 1 4 ) 5 4 5 - 8 8 8 3 ( F o x ) D A T E : 6 - 1 5 - 1 2 R E V . : 1 0 - 1 7 - 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 F A * : D I S T R I C T C O U N T Y R O U T E S H E E T P M S H E E T N O . T O T A L S H E E T S 8 R I V 9 1 6 . 9 2 2 PSOMAS 1 EXHIBIT 9D1' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-4 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 117-270-005 & 013 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcels 1, and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as 10 Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 13 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line 14 of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in 15 Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being 16 recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said 17 point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a 18 radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence 19 northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 8.81 feet through a central angle of 20 02°51'28" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; 21 thence northwesterly continuing along last said curve and said easterly line 14.10 feet 22 through a central angle of 04°34'41 "; thence South 81 °26'22" East 68.83 feet to the 23 beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet; thence easterly 24 along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence South 25 41°19'57" East 9.71 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly 26 having a radius of 2,851.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°51'38" East; 27 thence westerly along said curve 767.34 feet through a central angle of 15°25'16"; thence 28 North 81°26'22" West 57.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 29 30 Containing 6,614 square feet. 31 PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122275_APN_117-270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 015\Legals122275-4-PE.docx Page 1 of 10/9/2012 PS OMAS 1 See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 Prepared under the direction of 9 ]0 11 /0-09-/2 12 ' Date 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 P:12PTG0105011SURVEYTEGALS122275 APN_117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015kLegals122275-4-PE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/92012 — — " E X H I B I T D 2 P A R C E L # T I T L E G R A N T O R A R E A A P N 2 2 2 7 5 - 4 E S M T P E A R L S T R E E T P R O P . 6 6 1 4 S O F T . 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 & 0 1 3 S H E E T I N D E X 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 3 , , 7 _ 2 7 0 _ 0 0 4 o c . I 1 - - : S H E E T 3 S H E E T 4 a " r " & S " F " R . R . I I S H E E T 2 I I l , g _ 3 0 0 - 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 6 0 2 , v I I I ��J C , I N O , 2 0 0 6 - 0 5 6 5 6 9 1 1 E L F ? , Q I " I P C L , 2 1 P C L , 1 I P O L ! i 1 a 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 6 1 I 1 ? . . s , ��- I f i r _ P C I r } i - - - I - - - - - - - 6 6 I / - - - - I - - - - - - - - _ _ - - ���� _ _ _ _ - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - . _ T P O B P O B 2 2 2 7 5 4 3 6 5 3 6 0 R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y C / L S T A T I O N I N G L E G E N D P O B I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g T P O B I n d i c a t e s T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g ( R ) I n d i c a t e s R a d i a l B e o r i n g ( ) T i t l e t o S t a t e I I I I ! A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d N O T E S C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e a r i n g s o r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 . D i s t a n c e s a n d s t a t i o n i n g o r e g r i d d i s t a n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 9 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t o i n g r o u n d 2 2 2 / 5 - 4 P E R M A N E N T W A L L F O O T I N G E A S E M E N T d i s t a n c e s . A l l d i s t a n c e s o r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . I F E E T 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 P R E P A R E D B Y : P S O M A S 3 H u t t o n C e n t r e D r i v e , S t e . 2 0 0 S o n i c ( 7 1 4 ) 7 5 1 n 4 3 7 3 / ( 7 1 4 ) 5 4 5 9 E 8 8 3 ( f o . ) D A T E : 0 6 - 1 5 - 1 2 R E V . : 1 0 - 0 9 - 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 F A t t : D I S T R I C T C O U N T Y R O U T E S H E E T P M S H E E T N O . T O T A L S H E E T S 6 8 t R 1 V A 7 1 6 . 9 1 4 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 POR.. SECTION 30 PGR, LOT 3; SLOCX 73 T,3S. f R,6W, SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO 41 AND WATER COMPANY EL SOeRANTE L MD 9/6 Ma ll8 cc v) POR. PCL, 2 PCL, 1 ---) DOC, NO, 2006- DOC, NO, 2006- c 0565691 0,R. 0565691 O.R. Q W - — a - _.- R,S, 63166 �o S45°24'51 "W(R) — '' pp6 S40°50"10"W(R) IR — liti_'-- / - 0=1 5° 18'37" =2-84-3.0 L=759.69' rn ~ v PROPOSED R/W � : N81 °40'38"W 161 , � fk 21' , C2 Cl EXISTING R/W N81o40�38 vw=i w W TPOB 0 S37°58'42"W(R) POB 2'7„ CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE C1 C2 02°51'28" 04° 34'41 " 176.53' 1 76.53' 8.81' 1 4.1 0" L1 L2 S81°26"22"E N81 ° 26'22"W 68.83' 57.22' C3 15°25'16" 2851.00'767.34' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State j I I I I Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonia Ana California 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)545-B083 (Fax) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6. 9 2 4 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SOFT. 117-270-005 & 013 FOR. SECT 1 UN 30 T,3S,; R,61N. PCL. 1 R DOC, NO. 2006- EL SOBR SRA 0565691 D.R. 1`iJn^ J /2 r - R.S. 63/66 -� PROPOSED R/W — 7- __ / --....- _ �_ N / -_— - - -) ~ —�L=767•34'` 1.11 w w=15°25"16" R=2851 .00" _ _ to N- -.- w c/") =16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=581.97' --�-LLI N81°40'38"W 123.15 EXISTING R/W 1.11 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWA Y ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground I distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo 714)7 1n7373i(7o4 i415 (5-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 3 4 41 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-4 ESMT PEARL STREET PROP. 6614 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 PPR, SECTION 30 PPR. LOT, 12-A ASSESSOR'S MAP ._ 7,3S, , R.6W. - NO. 31 - RANCHO PCL, 3 � -- AMS 1/42-43 EL SPB;-�AN7E DOC, NO, 2006- PCL, r}---� MD ll9 0565691 f1,R. _ r �rr -DOC, NO, 2J0b- R,S, 63/66 ,-- 0565691 O.R. PCL 1 i ; DOC, NO, 2006- � --- ' 0565691 0 , R , � p_p3° 15126, ; ,", 506° 431p7"E.(R) i R=-161 .'6' , . ,59„ECR, L-161..6 _ ° 4 4 _ `, Sp6 _ _ -9, .-,-- 9.71 ' PROPOSED R/W r� --_ _. - - �p'�=759.6 �f��� _ - , 5° 18'37" R=2843 ---_ p- 76.34� -2851 ,pp L= 506° 51,38��E�R1 S41 ° 1 9'57"E 12.13' w -� `.2?,275 4, 5g1.9y, N�8° 00, 0R=2000.00 w w 0 L= 58'24 W _r p=1 6° 40'20'� 508° 20 59,1E(R) EXISTING R/W IDE FREEWAY 1 RIVERS ROUT 9 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 1 6 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (714)751-7373/(714)54598883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAit: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R 1 V 91 6.9 4 4 " P S O M A S 1 E X H I B I T ` E 1 ' 2 L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N 3 4 C a l t r a n s P a r c e l N o . 2 2 2 7 5 - 5 5 P e r m a n e n t A c c e s s E a s e m e n t 6 A P N 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 , 0 1 5 a n d 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 , 0 1 3 7 8 I n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e , S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , b e i n g a p o r t i o n o f t h e 9 l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s P a r c e l s 1 , 2 , 3 a n d 4 i n t h e Q u i t c l a i m D e e d r e c o r d e d A u g u s t 2 , 2 0 0 6 a s 1 0 D o c u m e n t N o . 2 0 0 6 - 0 5 6 5 6 9 1 o f O f f i c i a l R e c o r d s o f s a i d C o u n t y , d e s c r i b e d a s f o l l o w s : 1 1 1 2 B e g i n n i n g a t t h e s o u t h e a s t e r l y c o r n e r o f s a i d P a r c e l 2 ; t h e n c e N o r t h 8 1 � 4 0 ' 3 8 " W e s t 1 3 1 6 1 . 2 1 f e e t a l o n g t h e g e n e r a l s o u t h e r l y l i n e o f s a i d P a r c e l 2 t o a p o i n t o n t h e e a s t e r l y l i n e 1 4 o f t h e l a n d d e s c r i b e d i n t h e F i n a l O r d e r o f C o n d e m n a t i o n e n t e r e d S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 1 9 1 5 , i n 1 5 C a s e N o . 6 8 8 9 , S u p e r i o r C o u r t o f s a i d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , a C e r t i f i e d C o p y t h e r e o f b e i n g 1 6 r e c o r d e d O c t o b e r 4 , 1 9 1 5 i n B o o k 4 2 7 , P a g e 2 8 2 o f D e e d s , R e c o r d s o f s a i d C o u n t y , s a i d 1 7 p o i n t a l s o b e i n g t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e a s t e r l y h a v i n g a 1 8 r a d i u s o f 1 7 6 . 5 3 f e e t , t o w h i c h p o i n t a r a d i a l l i n e b e a r s S o u t h 3 7 � 5 8 ' 4 2 " W e s t ; t h e n c e 1 9 n o r t h w e s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e a n d s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e 8 3 . 7 4 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 2 0 2 7 � 1 0 ' 4 5 " t o a p o i n t o n s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e , s a i d p o i n t b e i n g t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g ; 2 1 t h e n c e c o n t i n u i n g n o r t h w e s t e r l y a l o n g l a s t s a i d c u r v e a n d s a i d e a s t e r l y l i n e 2 9 . 9 6 f e e t 2 2 t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 9 � 4 3 ' 3 1 " t o a p o i n t t h e r e o n ; t h e n c e S o u t h 8 0 � 1 7 ' 3 6 " E a s t 2 3 4 6 . 4 1 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 2 4 . 0 0 f e e t ; 2 4 t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 2 4 . 6 0 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 6 � 1 7 ' 3 2 " ; t h e n c e 2 5 S o u t h 8 6 � 3 5 ' 0 8 " E a s t 1 2 3 . 4 6 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e s o u t h e r l y h a v i n g a 2 6 r a d i u s o f 1 , 6 8 6 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 1 5 1 . 4 2 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l 2 7 a n g l e o f 0 5 � 0 8 ' 4 5 " t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c o m p o u n d c u r v e c o n c a v e s o u t h e r l y h a v i n g a 2 8 r a d i u s o f 5 0 0 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 6 3 . 0 0 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e 2 9 o f 0 7 � 1 3 ' 0 8 " ; t h e n c e S o u t h 7 4 � 1 3 ' 1 6 " E a s t 5 0 . 6 3 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e 3 0 n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 3 5 0 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e e a s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 6 5 . 3 9 f e e t 3 1 t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 1 0 � 4 2 ' 1 9 " t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c o m p o u n d c u r v e c o n c a v e " P A 2 P T G 0 1 0 5 0 1 1 S U R V E Y \ L . E G A L S \ 2 2 2 7 5 A P N _ 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 a n d 0 1 3 _ 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 a n d 0 1 5 \ L e g a l s \ 2 2 2 7 5 - 5 - A e c e s s . d o c x P a g e 1 o f 3 1 0 / 9 2 0 1 2 PS OMAS 1 northerly having a radius of 1,432.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 137.16 feet 2 through a central angle of 05°29'16" to the beginning of a compound curve concave 3 northerly having a radius of 375.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 169.53 feet 4 through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave 5 southerly having a radius of 325.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 154.43 feet 6 through a central angle of 27°13'30"; thence South 89°05'30" East 63.16 feet; thence 7 South 02°32'29" West 25.01 feet; thence North 89°05'30" West 62.45 feet to the 8 beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence westerly 9 along said curve 142.55 feet through a central angle of 27°13'30" to the beginning of a 10 reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 11 said curve 180.83 feet through a central angle of 25°54'09" to the beginning of a 12 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 1457.00 feet; thence westerly 13 along said curve 114.83 feet through a central angle of 04°30'56" to the beginning of a 14 compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along 15 said curve 80.25 feet through a central angle of 11 °29'40"; thence North 74°24'15" West 16 34.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly having a radius of 400.00 feet; 17 thence westerly along said curve 35.97 feet through a central angle of 05°09'10" to the 18 beginming of a compound curve concave southerly having a radius of 1,660.00 feet; 19 thence westerly along said curve 203.64 feet through a central angle of 07°01'43 "; thence 20 North 86°35'08" West 123.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 21 radius of 250.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 27.46 feet through a central angle 22 of 06°17'32"; thence North 80°17'36" West 31.59 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 23 24 Containing 26,164 square feet. 25 26 See Exhibit `E2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:12PT0010501\SURVEY\ LEGALS\22275_APN_117-270-005 and 013_115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-5-Access.docx Page 2 of 3 10/9/2012 PSQMAS 1 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 ]0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /D-09--1Z Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEIILEGALS\22275_APN— 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015%egalsk22275-5-Access.doex Page 3 of 3 10/9/2012 — EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 S0. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 117_ 7 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 ,I d I W SHEET 2 q F- •_T.�S'F• R.R• 119'300_021 115-060-016 1 I CIc , IW PCL, 2 00C,I N0, 2006-05656911 0,R, ( PCL. 1 c Fyg' 1 1 7-270-0061 I 63/66 ' PCL 4 PP- 1--i.-r.w----rr7rJ-,•w� 4. -----_ i• TAT Tw. .,.. ,w n-, .. Tr • r�� •!�' --�- , • J---------_---- 1.0J TPOB POB 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring ( ) Title to State I II I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Santa Ano, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(7141545-8883 (Fax) - DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 1 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP, 26064 SO.FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 W cc FOR, LOT 3; SLOCX 3 PJi�, PCL, 2 SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND DOC, NO, 2006- AND WATER COMPANY U5'o5671 O i�. MS 7/6 R2 TPOB FOR. SECTION 30 T,3S,; R,6W, RANCHO EL SOSRANTE ms 1/8 cc LIJ 586° 35'08"E —L 1 _�C3� 123.46' �— _ ° " Rl1686.00 08=4 51 ,42' cl R1 (22275-5) '� LST--- _-- _-- C14 N 86° 35 08 W �-- _r— 0=07°0-01 'q 3" -___ �''0 123.46' 06, �� --'— ---___ lhil _ — — — -- — — —1ONOWIMMOMiros. — — R=1660.00' L=203.64' PCL, 1 —DOC . NO._ 2006-_ 0565691 D , R , — -- — r� w w �2--. N81°40'38"W 161.21 PROPOSED R/W � : 2 N81°40'38"W ,v, POB/ 123.15' EXISTING R/W w °fie, A. e) ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY � CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE Cl 27° 10'45" 1 76.53' 83.74' L 1 S80° 1 7'36HE 46.41 ' C2 09° 4 3'31 " 1 76.53' 29.96' L5 N80° 1 7'36"W 31 .59' C3 06°17'32" 224.00' 24.60' R1 565°09'27"W C14 06°17'32" 250.00' 27.46' R2 S74°52'58"W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND CAL STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 9 360 ( ) Title to State J I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain CJ c 2 2 2 / - J PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hut*on Centre Drive, Ste. 20C Santo Ana, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(414(545-eee3 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 2 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 FOR, SECT 1ON 30 T,3S,• R,61/11, RANCHO RCL, 1 EL SODRANTE DOC, NO, 2006- 1V18 1/8 0565691 O.R, S74° 1 3'1 6"E C4�... C5 50.63' R,S, 63166 .- ;--z r-.. . - C 8 C13 PLC' 2 -- N i- LA N74°24'1 5"W C1 1 -- C10 - C9 34.28'/ - J - - _ - - - v i- w w EXISTING R/W PROPOSED R/W N N \� w w V' P=16°40'20" R=2000.00' L=561.97' -"- N81 °40 38 W 123.15' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY N CURVE DATA CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C4 05°08'45" 1686.00' 151.42' C9 25°54'09" 400.00' 180.83' C5 07°13'08" 500.00' 63.00' C10 04°30'56" 1457.00' 114.83' C6 10°42'19" 350.00' 65.39' C1 1 1 1 °29140" 400.00' 80.25' C7 05°29'16" 1432.00' 137.16' C12 05°09'10" 400.00' 35.97' C8 25°54'09" 375.00' 169.53' C13 07°01'43" 1660.00' 203.64' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 363 2 ( ) Title to State 1 I I 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin 2 2 2 /''J 5 - 5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (7141751'-7373i(714o154598883 (F0.) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 3 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 w _ 2 w POR, LOT, 12-A PCL. 3 ASSESSOR'S MAP PJR, SECTION 30 DOC, NO, 2006- NO, 31 T.3S,- R.6W, 0565691 O.R. AMB 1/42-43 RANCHO EL SOBRANTE -7° 13, A3' --.� L2,- MB 1 /8 R . S . 63/b b D�2 0, L.1 r -f- z ; 5.0 DOC. N0. 2006- ..•- s- ,,."""...,."L4--- 0565691 J.R. 2 142• , ,% D- �- , Dy2,o 54' 0 69.53 �"' ;'� i R,300 •C0 ,, ,- L 1 315'00 �' �� '' ,, _ _---' R'- r s , �- -- �' FOL. 1 ,7 ptiog:-- _ _ 0 200, L.1a0 — �/ 0565691 O.R. '� � R=4 PROPOSED R/W i� io 1 N78 in I; w w v) N u) 582„W 4 R_2000.00 =581•9 � p-16°40'20" o ""- EXISTING R/W o v; LINE DATA 0 BEARING DISTANCE -1 -13 L2 S89°05'30"E 63.16' L4 N89°05'30"W 62.45' E FREEWAY RIVERSID 91 'ROUTE 91SIDE FREEWAY UTE /LSTATIONING RO 7 LEGEND 6 POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State J I 1 1 ( Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 / S - S PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonta Aro, California 92707 (714)751-7373/1714)54S-8883 (Fax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAA: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R IV 91 6. 9 4 5 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-5 PAE PEARL STREET PROP. 26,164 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 117-270-005 & 013 -, _ N LINE DATA . BEARING DISTANCE A=00°45'34" L2 S89°05'30"E 63.16' to R=5779.66' L3 S02°32'2911W 25.01' L=76.62' L4 N89°05'3011W 62.45' v L2 140'88' A'T• S.F. R.Ra M PCB , 4 00C, NO. 2006- � -t— C75b5b91 U,r�, PUR„ LOT, 12-A ,` n 115-060-015 w z -- — ASSESSOR' S MAP rn cv N O , 31 re;o '" � AMB 1 /42-43 `' rn o w w \PROPOSED o R,S, 63l66 , R/W 'o a' lR 1 `',9'21 'S2 9 5\2 051,��. 'Ls_ b. -13 EXISTING R/W J F'i E 1 01.00' 541 ° 1 9'57"E 15°RSID N78 58'2q"W .92' 11v oISt 9 R 310 LEGEND "E'i POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point of Beginning (R) 0) ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Indicates Radial Bearing C/L STATIONING ( )Title to State I I I I !Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 ! 5 - 5 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Sonia Ana, Colifornio 92707 (7141751— 7373/(71141545-8883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 3; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RN V 91 6.9 5 5 " P S O M A S 1 2 3 4 6 C a ! t r a n s P a r c e l N o . 2 2 2 7 5 - 6 P e r m a n e n t U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t A P N 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 & 0 1 5 E X H I B I T ` F 1 ' L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N 7 8 I n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e , S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , b e i n g a p o r t i o n o f t h e 9 l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s P a r c e l s 3 a n d 4 i n t h e Q u i t c l a i m D e e d r e c o r d e d A u g u s t 2 , 2 0 0 6 a s I o D o c u m e n t N o . 2 0 0 6 - 0 5 6 5 6 9 1 o f O f f i c i a l R e c o r d s o f s a i d C o u n t y , d e s c r i b e d a s f o l l o w s : 1 1 1 2 B e g i n n i n g a t t h e n o r t h e a s t e r l y c o r n e r o f s a i d P a r c e l 4 ; t h e n c e a l o n g t h e g e n e r a l n o r t h e r l y 1 3 l i n e t h e r e o f t h e f o l l o w i n g t w o ( 2 ) c o u r s e s : 1 ) N o r t h 7 7 � 3 4 ' 1 2 " W e s t 1 4 0 . 8 8 f e e t t o t h e 1 4 b e g i n n i n g o f a c u r v e c o n c a v e n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 5 , 7 7 9 . 6 6 a n d 2 ) w e s t e r l y a l o n g 1 5 s a i d c u r v e 7 6 . 6 2 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 0 � 4 5 ' 3 4 " t o a p o i n t t h e r e o n ; t h e n c e 1 6 S o u t h 0 2 � 3 2 ' 2 9 " W e s t 9 5 . 9 4 f e e t t o t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a n o n - t a n g e n t c u r v e c o n c a v e 1 7 n o r t h e r l y h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 2 , 8 3 7 . 0 0 f e e t , t o w h i c h p o i n t a r a d i a l I i n e b e a r s S o u t h 1 8 0 9 � 5 9 ' 5 4 " E a s t ; t h e n c e w e s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d c u r v e 7 3 . 3 3 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 1 9 0 1 � 2 8 ' 5 2 " t o t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g ; t h e n c e c o n t i n u i n g w e s t e r l y a l o n g s a i d 2 0 2 , 8 3 7 . 0 0 f o o t r a d i u s c u r v e 1 4 . 8 2 f e e t t h r o u g h a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 0 0 � 1 7 ' 5 8 " ; t h e n c e N o r t h 2 1 3 9 � 1 2 ' 3 8 " E a s t 3 2 . 3 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e N o r t h 5 1 � 4 4 ' 4 8 " W e s t 2 4 8 . 6 5 f e e t t o a p o i n t o n t h e 2 2 n o r t h e r l y l i n e o f s a i d P a r c e l 3 ; t h e n c e S o u t h 7 4 � 2 6 ' 3 0 " E a s t 6 4 . 8 0 f e e t a l o n g s a i d 2 3 n o r t h e r l y l i n e t o a p o i n t t h e r e o n ; t h e n c e S o u t h 5 1 � 4 4 ' 4 8 " E a s t 2 0 6 . 7 9 f e e t ; t h e n c e S o u t h 2 4 3 9 � 1 2 ' 3 8 " W e s t 2 5 . 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e N o r t h 5 1 � 4 4 ' 4 8 " W e s t 7 . 5 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e S o u t h 2 5 3 9 � 1 2 ' 3 8 " W e s t 2 1 . 5 3 f e e t t o t h e T r u e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g . 2 6 2 7 C o n t a i n i n g 6 , 1 8 1 s q u a r e f e e t . 2 8 2 9 S e e E x h i b i t ` F 2 ' a t t a c h e d h e r e t o a n d m a d e a p a r t h e r e o f . 3 0 3 1 P A 2 P T G 0 1 0 5 0 1 \ S U R V E Y I L E G A L S \ 2 2 2 7 5 _ A P N _ I 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 a n d 0 1 3 1 1 5 - 0 6 0 - 0 1 3 a n d O I R L e g a l s \ 2 2 2 7 5 - 6 - P U E . d o c x P a g e 1 o f 2 1 0 / 9 / 2 0 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date P:12PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS122275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 0151Legals122275-6-PUE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT F2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-6 PUE PEARL STREET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 7-270-004 o a e r. �S • F, R.R. 1j9`3p0-021' SHEET 2 i � 115-060-016 1 (4 22275 V DOC, � W PGL , 2 NO, 2006-0565691 O,R, I PGL . J INwillr . _ _ ------- .----------------------------J _ ��ss sl-1 rs Ns � --_- .i T P 1 1 7-27o-oor I 0 B 117-270-006 L J 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 / 5 - 6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Soria Ana, California 92707 (714)751-7373/7,4)545-8883 (Fax) DATE:06-15-12 REV.:2; 0-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 1 2 EXHIBIT F2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-6 PUE PEARL STREET PROP. 6,181 SO. FT. 115-060-013 & 015 CURVE DATA RADIAL DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING BEARING DISTANCE C1 00°45'34" 5779.66' 76.62' R1 S13°11'22"W L1 N39°12'38"E 32.30' C2 01°28'52" 2837.00' 73.33' R2 S09°59'54"E L2 S39°12'38"W 25.00' C3 00°17'58" 2837.00' 14.82' R3 S08°31'02"E L3 N51°44'48"W 7.50' �--� R4 S08° 1 3'04"E L4 S39° 1 2'38"W 21 .53' 1j9_3p0-021 S 7q °26 '30„ •»wh 6g48p4s' \ Q'o2°3 A ° T. ''„,,, �. ,* S 9 10., R=5779.66' L_ NSia., �° 9'', . 97 TN., ''9q8, ► IP �9 Doe aOON.-6 '`�•,s- S° F° R° R° 67 59,N7 ° 3 q - C1 �'� 4 74o.8:12„W Jm POR, LOT., 12-A �- M,r; ASSESSOR j S MAP POB M 63/6b . ,9, •6— � ��- 2�G'�"�.,L3'`, op. Yi?"R4 r ccv, o AhdS JJ�}2-�}3NO, 31 Mo .4 DOC. NO, 2006- cnn _ _ ' .I �� C2 R2 0 0565691 O'1 50�p01 _ _ C3 L4 „R� _ _ — — — 1 — I. TPOB R3 0 5°51 ,,' g9.2, " =0 �- $° 23. 16 _ji S, PROPOSED R/W N78°58'24'W 00' 0 R=2000. o� 131.00' p=16° 40'20' 1 .91, ° S41 ° 19'57" L=Sa No 15.92' FREEWAY -10 EXISTING R/W � 3 vERSIpE -;3 E. 9� RI 9 ROU1 a EEWAY RIVERSID STATIONING 91 C�� LEGEND ROUTE POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 5- 6 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 40 SO 160 240 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo Ann, Coiifornio 92707 (7141751-7373/(7141545-S883 (Fox) DATE:06-15-2012 REV.: 2; 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 2 2 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `Gl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22275-7 Temporary Construction Easement APN 117-270-007 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 212.14 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the westerly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County; said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 50°21'13" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said westerly line 18.22 feet through a central angle of 05°03'17" to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°26'22" West 28.54 feet to a point on said general southerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 25.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 69°22' 14" West; thence northerly along said curve and said general southerly line 12.54 feet through a central angle of 28°44'54" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 21.31 feet to a point on said westerly line of said land described in said Final Order of Condemnation, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 206.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 59°49'01" West; thence southeasterly along said curve and said westerly line 15.89 feet through a central angle of 04°24'31" to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 304 square feet. PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275_APN_117-270-OOTLegals\22275-7-TCE.docx Page 1 of 2 10/ 17/2012 PSOMAS 1 2 See Exhibit `G2' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 3 4 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 5 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 6 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 7 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 8 9 10 Prepared under the direction of 11 12 13 14 / �,.�V���L A047 /2 15 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-007\Legals\22275-7-TCE.docx Page 2 of 2 l 0/ 17/2012 EXHIBIT G2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-7 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 304 SO. FT. 117-270-007 SHEET INDEX 117-270-m3 " 7-27p_0p4 o 144 •A • T • �S• F • • R• R• 1j9'30p_0?1 A . Lij 115-060-016 N � N i- — — —I cc J a ;7c1r , I DOC, NO, 2006-0565691 0,R, ;7cL , 1 PeC 1 1 7-270-006 I?, `�_ -__T P0Ei r- S, ---- ---- 6�/bb _------- ------------ .__ J__ ."'_..ram saa..aac-_--. N81 40'38"W i► ----- -----�:----- 212.14' � 0 1lit POB 3 i Jk,22275-7) 365 I SHEET 2 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY CAL STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State I I I 1 1 Access Prohibited . NOTES Coordinotes and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin 2 2 2 / 5 - 7 �''J TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo141751- 7373i(714)54598883 (Fax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FAl$: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 (1 6." 1 2 EXHIBIT G2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-7 TCE PEARL STREET PROP 304 SOFT. 117-270-007 I CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 25.00' 28°44'54" 12.54' 30' C2 206.53' 04°24'31" 15.89' RADIAL DATA BEARING R1 S69°22'14"W W A�"`N 0 R2 N81 ° 52'51 "W S10° AZ R3 559°49'01 "W PCL 2 ZO DOC, NO., 2006-0565691 0,R Q M� W O� v a o N c') --N POR, LOT 3; r'LDCX 73 z M R2 1; �\ `�o SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND i 2,27 $- �� �, 00 1 AND RATER COMPANY 7 •,.,, �`� >•il5 ��6 R_ 25, 00' R 1 R —`''6 0— — \ 39.27'� N81°26' h� _ _ TPOB �_ 4=05°03 7 7, — � 06 53, — — 19.65'_ L==218.22 LINE DATA N87 °40'38„w N81 °40'38„ W BEARING DISTANCE 272.1q _ L1 S81°26'22"E 21.31' PROPOSED RAW LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (RI indicates Radial Bearing ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ( ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 22275 7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo (7141755n7California373/714)54598883 (fax) DATE:06-15-12 REV.: 10-17-12 EA: OF540 FM:: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.9 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `Hl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22275-8 Temporary Construction Easement APN 117-270-005 & 013 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcels 1 and 2 in the Quitclaim Deed recorded August 2, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0565691 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 81 °40'38" West 161.21 feet along the general southerly line of said Parcel 2 to a point on the easterly line of the land described in the Final Order of Condemnation entered September 29, 1915, in Case No. 6889, Superior Court of said Riverside County, a Certified Copy thereof being recorded October 4, 1915 in Book 427, Page 282 of Deeds, Records of said County, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 176.53 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 37°58'42" West; thence northwesterly along said curve and said easterly line 22.91 feet through a central angle of 07°26'09" to a point on said easterly line, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing northwesterly along said easterly line and said curve 18.72 feet through a central angle of 06°04'33" to a point thereon; thence South 81 °26'22" East 83.19 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 294.53 feet through a central angle of 05°57'39"; thence North 59°49'50" East 46.06 feet; thence South 74°24'15" East 73.17 feet; thence South 87°22'34" East 66.13 feet; thence South 02°37'26" West 10.98 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,839.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 00°57'28" East; thence easterly along said curve 20.04 feet through a central angle of 00°24'16"; thence North 02°37'26" East 8.02 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,831.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 01 °22'25" East; thence easterly along said curve P:\2PTG010501\SURVEYNLEGALS122275_APN_117-270-005 and 013_I 15-060-013 and 015Tegals\22275-8-TCE.docx Page 1 of 2 10/9/2012 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 PSOMAS 1 278.36 feet through a central angle of 05°38'01 " to a point on the easterly line of said 2 Parcel 1; thence South 41°19'57" East 6.07 feet along said easterly line to a point thereon, 3 said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius 4 of 2,837.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 07°04'21" East; thence westerly 5 along said curve 20.99 feet through a central angle of 00°25'26"; thence South 41 °21'39" East 8.50 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 2,843.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 06°44'59" East; thence westerly along said curve 759.69 feet through a central angle of 15°18'37"; thence North 81 °26'22" West 68.83 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 11,819 square feet. 13 See Exhibit 112' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Prepared under the direction of 21 22 23 24 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. �0-09-/2 Date P:12PTG0105011SURVEYNLEGALS\22275 APN 117-270-005 and 013 115-060-013 and 015\Legals\22275-8-TCE.docx Page 2 of 2 10/9/2012 EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11,819 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 SHEET INDEX 117-270-003 ?1'-2�p-004 I SHEET SHEET 3 SHEET 4 —r T•`�S•,- P.R. I N 2 ,� 119-3 115-060-016 I Crtv I IW PCL, 2 I DOC ,I NO. 2006-0565691 ( PCL. 1 F�,s, - °p 02/ I O.R.� ` I pC ..: .,` I 117-270-006 I 63/66 I �..- — - PCL. -------- ----- -- -- ---- —_ ----------- I----- --. '" — __---.-rn•, . .. . . �.. I--- � ---, L — 1 TPOB POB ,8) Q222/5 365 360 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING I. LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Beoring ( ) Title to State I I I I 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 100 200 400 600 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hotton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (714)751-7373/(714)545-8 a3 (Fax) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISiRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 1 4 EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 ,_ W Lu Ct v) J it Q W 0- FOR SECTION 30 FOR. LOT 3; EILOCK 73 1.3S.; R.,6W. SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND RANCHO AND WATER COMPANY EL SODRANTE MD 9/6 MD 1 /8 FOR. PCL , 2 PCL, 1 DOC. NO. 2006- DOC. NO, 2006- 0565691 O.R. 0565691 O.R. — — , - —`�`��------ - -- , _ ,,kb. ;� to - - o TPOB �c,\ p R.S. 63/66 06 L 1 ,� A=05° 57'39" R=2831 .00' L=294.53' ilk NI �v—,_-" A=1 5°18'37" R=2843.00' L=759.69' PROPOSED R/W C2 �' 0 w 38"W 161. S45°24'51"W(R) C1 N81 40' 21 2 EXISTING R/W 123.15' N81 °40'38„W LU S37°58'42"W(R) w POB rn 2275 8 CURVE DATA LINE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING DISTANCE C1 C2 07°26'09" 06°04'33" 176.53' 176.53' 22.91' 18.72' L1 L2 S81°26'22"E N81°26'22"W 83.19' 68.83' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 9 360 ( )Title to State I I I 1 1 Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Mutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200Santa (714)751n7373/(7114)54S-8883 (F0x) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.:10-09-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 7 R1V 91 /� 6.9 2 4 " E X H I B I T H 2 P A R C E L # T I T L E G R A N T O R A R E A A P N 2 2 2 7 5 - 8 T C E P E A R L S T R E E T P R O P . 1 1 8 1 9 S O . F T . 1 1 7 - 2 7 0 - 0 0 5 & 0 1 3 P C L , . 1 D O G . . N O , 2 0 0 6 - P O R , S E C T I O N 3 0 0 5 6 5 8 9 1 O , R , T . 3 S , ; R , b 4 1 1 1 . R A N C H O R A D I A L D A T A E L S O S R A N T E M S 1 / 8 B E A R I N G R . S . 6 3 / 6 8 _ _ R 1 R 2 R 3 S 0 0 � 5 7 ' 2 8 " E S 0 1 � 2 1 ' 4 4 " E S 0 1 � 2 2 ' 2 5 " E N 5 9 � 4 9 . 5 0 " E - - - �� - - - - - - - 4 6 . 0 6 ' - - - - � - R S 7 4 0 R 3 - - �� 4 ' 1 5 E L 4 O Q = 0 5 � 5 7 3 9 ' R ; , ` ' - 7 3 1 . ? S 8 7 2 2 3 4 E C 4 3 - - . - - ' R = 2 8 3 1 . 0 0 ��- 6 6 . 1 _ L = 2 9 4 . 5 3 L 3 L = 7 5 9 . 6 9 0 = 1 5 � 1 8 ' 3 7 " R = 2 8 4 3 . 0 0 " ~ ~ ' w R 1 R 2 w _ - ; _ P R O P O S E D R / 0 1 C 3 = 0 w v ) - L = 5 8 1 . 9 7 ' - - �� 0 = 1 6 � 4 0 ' 2 0 " R = 2 0 0 0 . 0 0 ' N 8 1 � 4 0 ' 3 8 " W 1 2 3 . 1 5 ' E X I S T I N G R / W w 0 L I N E D A T A C U R V E D A T A B E A R I N G D I S T A N C E D E L T A R A D I U S L E N G T H L 3 L 4 S 0 2 � 3 7 ' 2 6 " W N O 2 � 3 7 ' 2 6 " E 1 0 . 9 8 ' 8 . 0 2 ' C 3 C 4 0 0 � 2 4 ' 1 6 " 0 5 � 3 8 ' 0 1 " 2 8 3 9 . 0 0 ' 2 8 3 1 . 0 0 ' 2 0 . 0 4 ' 2 7 8 . 3 6 ' R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y R O U T E 9 1 R I V E R S I D E F R E E W A Y C / L S T A T I O N I N G L E G E N D P O B I n d i c a t e s P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g T P O B I n d i c a t e s T r u e P o i n t O f B e g i n n i n g ( R ) I n d i c a t e s R a d i a l S e a r i n g 3 6 3 2 ( ) T i t l e t o S t a t e 1 1 I 1 I A c c e s s P r o h i b i t e d N O T E S C o o r d i n a t e s a n d b e o r i n g s o r e o n C C S 1 9 8 3 ( 2 0 0 7 . 0 0 ) Z o n e 6 . D i s t a n c e s a n d s t o t i o n i n g a r e g r i d d i s t o n c e s . D i v i d e b y 0 . 9 9 9 9 7 4 7 6 t o o b t a i n 2 2 2 7 5 " 8 T E M P O R A R Y C O N S T R U C T I O N E A S E M E N T g r o u n d d i s t a n c e s . A l l d i s t a n c e s a r e i n f e e t u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . I F E E T 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 P R E P A R E D B Y : P S O M A S 3 H u t t o n C e n t r e D r i v e , S t e . 2 0 0 S a n t a A n a , C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 7 0 7 ( 7 1 4 ) 7 5 1 - 7 3 7 3 / ( 7 1 4 1 5 4 5 - 8 8 8 3 ( F a x ) D A T E : 0 6 - 1 5 - 1 2 R E V . : 1 0 - 0 9 - 1 2 E A : O F 5 4 0 F A n : D I S T R I C T C O U N T Y R O U T E S H E E T P M S H E E T N O . T O T A L S H E E T S 8 R I V 9 1 6 . 9 3 4 i EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22275-8 TCE PEARL STREET PROP. 11819 SO.FT. 117-270-005 & 013 M POR, SECTION 30 T ,3S i{ bl�ll ` RANCHO EL SODRAN7� PCL. 3 MS 1✓� DOC., NO, 200b-'-, R.S.63/66 0565691 O.,R, ,-- PCL, 1 ,, / i DOC, NO, 2006- (R) � 0565691 O • R ., S07° 00 26 E � 156°01) '. S06° 38 - � / , L=218 36' ,� 'R 2 831 %.-- L- y ��-`� --=05°38'01" ..,,- 00 _759•.69 • "`_Q=15 18'37" / oQq 59„E(R) 506 POR, LOT, 12-A ASSESSOR'S MAP — _ '., `=� NO, 3 1 '-� 'AMS I/42-43 PCL, 4_ �.,-- --nob, NO. 2006- ',-0565691 O,R, o ,5"/"E S41 19 '• r,, 6.071 o Oq' 21":E (R) S07 :� OOo 25126" R=2 g31 •' 0 L- S4185039 E 1- 22215-8 w PROPOSED R/W •97' N78 51824"w v7 w w u) L_581 - 00.00, R=20 SOao2p'S9"E(R) p=16° 40 20 EXISTING R/W FREEWAY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 91 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 1 6 365 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 11 I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 5- 8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Santo Ano, Californio 92707 (714)751-73731t7141545-eee3 (Fox) DATE: 06-15-12 REV.: 10-09-12 EA: OF540 FAts: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.9 4 4 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Frances White, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on Friday, March 29, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 115-060-013, 117-270-005, 117- 270-007 and 117-270-013: Pearl Street Properties, LLC 43020 John Warner Road Temecula, CA 92592 Record Owner John Murphy, Esq. Murphy & Evertz 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 550 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Courtesy Copy DATED: March 29, 2013. Frances White 1733 6.02100\7886312.1 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Best Best & Krieger LLP Agreement for Amendment Legal Services - STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 07-31-164-07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 07-31 164-00, with Best Best & Krieger LLP (BBK) for additional legal services related to FY 2012/13 in the amount of $960,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 41) BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • General legal services for the Commission and its projects and programs have been provided by BBK for several years. BBK has been a key partner to the Commission's expanded responsibilities resulting from the 1989 Measure A and 2009 Measure A programs. Legal services provided by BBK have been critical to the Commission's operations, and BBK's performance has met the Commission's expectations. As a result of the satisfactory and value-added services provided by BBK, it has been included on the Commission's annual list of recurring contracts. At its June 7, 2012 meeting, the Commission approved the FY 201.2/13 recurring contracts list which included an agreement with BBK for general legal services for $2,258,100; however, it was recently determined that the amount erroneously excluded $590,000 that was included in the FY 2012/13 budget for special legal services primarily related to right of way acquisition for 1989 Measure A Highway, 2009 Measure A Highway and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) projects. The special legal services budget amount should have been included in the FY 2012/13 recurring contract amount for BBK for a total agreement amount of $2,848,100. During FY 2012/13, the Commission has required additional legal services that are projected at $370,000 to support its litigation related to rail Agenda Item 9A 93 (Perris Valley Line) and TUMF CETAP right of way acquisition (Mid County Parkway) projects. These additional services were necessary to support the Commission's projects and unanticipated at the time the budget was adopted in:. June 2012. In July 2012, a price analysis conducted by the Commission's internal audit firm found BBK's fully -burdened hourly rates to be reasonable, priced competitively, and within market rates. Although BBK provided additional services not anticipated, BBK's rates remained constant during the fiscal year. Based on the information provided, staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 07-31-164-00 with BBK for an amount not to exceed of $960,000. The recommended amount for FY 2012/13, as revised to include this Amendment No. 7, is $3,218,100. This amendment to increase BBK's agreement amount does not require a budget adjustment, as there is sufficient budget authority available to transfer expenditures between accounts. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2012/13 Amount: $960,000 Source of Funds: Measure A Budget Adjustment: No 222 31 65101 $ 360,000 GL/Project Accounting No.: 262 31 65101 $ 180,000 210 73 65101 $ 370,000 2 221 33 65101 $ 50,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \l/tbii,dajt,_,0 Date: 06/04/13 • Agenda Item 9A 94 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : M i c h e l e C i s n e r o s , A c c o u n t i n g a n d H u m a n R e s o u r c e s M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : Q u a r t e r l y F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e Q u a r t e r l y F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s f o r t h e p e r i o d e n d e d M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : D u r i n g t h e l a s t n i n e m o n t h s o f t h e f i s c a l y e a r , s t a f f m o n i t o r e d t h e r e v e n u e s a n d e x p e n d i t u r e s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . T h e a t t a c h e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s p r e s e n t t h e r e v e n u e s a n d e x p e n d i t u r e s f o r t h e n i n e m o n t h s e n d e d o f t h e f i s c a l y e a r . P e r i o d c l o s i n g a c c r u a l a d j u s t m e n t s a r e n o t i n c l u d e d f o r r e v e n u e s e a r n e d b u t n o t b i l l e d a n d e x p e n d i t u r e s i n c u r r e d f o r g o o d s a n d s e r v i c e s r e c e i v e d b u t n o t y e t i n v o i c e d , a s s u c h a d j u s t m e n t s a r e n o r m a l l y m a d e d u r i n g t h e y e a r - e n d c l o s i n g a c t i v i t i e s . T h e o p e r a t i n g s t a t e m e n t s h o w s t h e s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e s f o r t h e t h i r d q u a r t e r a t 5 8 p e r c e n t o f t h e b u d g e t . T h i s i s a r e s u l t o f t h e G o v e r n m e n t a l A c c o u n t i n g S t a n d a r d s B o a r d ( G A S B ) S t a t e m e n t N o . 3 3 . G A S B 3 3 r e q u i r e s s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e s t o b e a c c r u e d f o r t h e p e r i o d i n w h i c h i t i s c o l l e c t e d a t t h e p o i n t o f s a l e . T h e S t a t e B o a r d o f E q u a l i z a t i o n c o l l e c t s t h e M e a s u r e A f u n d s a n d r e m i t s t h e s e f u n d s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a f t e r t h e r e p o r t i n g p e r i o d f o r t h e b u s i n e s s e s . T h i s c r e a t e s a t w o - m o n t h l a g i n t h e r e c e i p t o f r e v e n u e s b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e s e f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s r e f l e c t t h e r e v e n u e s r e l a t e d t o c o l l e c t i o n s t h r o u g h J a n u a r y 2 0 1 3 . O n a c a s h b a s i s , t h e M e a s u r e A a n d L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d s ( L T F ) s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e s a r e 1 0 . 5 8 p e r c e n t a n d 9 . 7 7 p e r c e n t h i g h e r , r e s p e c t i v e l y , t h a n t h e s a m e p e r i o d l a s t f i s c a l y e a r . S t a f f w i l l c o n t i n u e t o m o n i t o r t h e t r e n d s i n t h e s a l e s t a x r e c e i p t s a n d r e p o r t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n y n e c e s s a r y a d j u s t m e n t s t o t h e F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 b u d g e t f o r s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e s . F e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d l o c a l r e v e n u e s a r e o n a r e i m b u r s e m e n t b a s i s . T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l r e c e i v e t h e s e r e v e n u e s a s e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t c o s t s a r e i n c u r r e d a n d i n v o i c e d t o t h e A g e n d a I t e m 9 B 9 5 respective agencies. Approximately $50.5 million of budgeted federal reimbursement revenues are related to the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project. During the FY 2012/13 budget process, the Commission took a conservative approach in estimating the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of $4 million passed through from Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) as a result of the housing sector. In January 2013, the Commission approved staff's recommendation to increase the TUMF revenue budget to $6.3 million due to signs of recovery from the nationwide recession in the local economy and an improvement in the housing market. The budgeted balance of $1,257,000 relates to the TUMF Zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange project. Staff will invoice WRCOG for TUMF Zone reimbursements as eligible remaining expenditures are incurred in the fourth quarter. Other revenues include property management revenues generated from properties acquired in connection with the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP). The expenditures categories are in line overall with the expectations of the budget with the following exceptions: • Professional services are under budget, and remaining budget authority is not expected to be exceeded in the last quarter of FY 2012/13 • Support costs are under budget due to unused budget authority for station maintenance and repair, and utilities; • Program operations expenditures are under budget and reflect vendor invoices for program management submitted through January 2013; • Operating and capital disbursements are made as claims are submitted to the Commission by the transit operators; • Special studies are under budget due to unused budget authority for project, planning, and monitoring and 'rail feasibility studies. The Commission will use the authority as the studies are developed; • Local streets and roads expenditures are related to the timing of Measure A sales tax revenues as previously explained. These financial statements reflect expenditures made to the local jurisdictions related to collections through January 2013;. • Regional arterial expenditures primarily represent expenditures for the highways and regional arterial program administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). CVAG requests reimbursements from the Commission based on available funds and sufficient budget authority; and • Capital outlay expenditures are under budget due to unexpended authority for hardware and software improvements and station security improvements. • Agenda Item 9B 96 " " " D e b t s e r v i c e i n t e r e s t e x p e n d i t u r e s o n t h e 2 0 1 0 b o n d s a r e m a d e i n D e c e m b e r a n d J u n e , w h i l e i n t e r e s t e x p e n d i t u r e s o n t h e 2 0 0 9 b o n d s a r e m a d e m o n t h l y d u e t o t h e v a r i a b l e r a t e n a t u r e o f t h e b o n d s . P r i n c i p a l p a y m e n t s o n t h e 2 0 0 9 b o n d s o f $ 6 . 8 m i l l i o n a r e m a d e i n J u n e ; n o p r i n c i p a l p a y m e n t s o n t h e 2 0 1 0 b o n d s a r e d u e i n F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 . D e b t p r o c e e d s c o n s i s t o f c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r a n d b o n d i s s u a n c e s . T h e C o m m i s s i o n i s s u e d $ 4 0 m i l l i o n i n c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r n o t e s d u r i n g t h e f i r s t h a l f o f t h e f i s c a l y e a r . A s i g n i f i c a n t p o r t i o n o f t h e d e b t p r o c e e d s w e r e e x p e c t e d t o o c c u r i n t h e f o u r t h q u a r t e r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e i s s u a n c e o f s a l e s t a x a n d t o l l r e v e n u e b o n d s f o r t h e S R - 9 1 C I P ; h o w e v e r , t h e s e b o n d s w i l l l i k e l y b e i s s u e d i n e a r l y J u l y 2 0 1 3 . A s a r e s u l t , t h e r e t i r e m e n t o f $ 1 2 0 m i l l i o n i n b u d g e t e d d e b t s e r v i c e p r i n c i p a l p a y m e n t s w i l l n o t o c c u r i n F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 . A d d i t i o n a l l y , a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 4 4 4 m i l l i o n o f t h e b u d g e t e d d e b t p r o c e e d s r e l a t e t o a n a n t i c i p a t e d f e d e r a l l o a n t h r o u g h t h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I n f r a s t r u c t u r e F i n a n c e a n d I n n o v a t i o n A c t ( T I F I A ) . B a s e d o n d i s c u s s i o n s w i t h T I F I A s t a f f r e g a r d i n g t h e l o a n a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , l o a n p r o c e e d s w i l l b e r e c e i v e d a s e l i g i b l e d e s i g n - b u i l d c o s t s a r e i n c u r r e d . T h e r e f o r e , t h i s p o r t i o n o f t h e b u d g e t e d d e b t p r o c e e d s w i l l a l s o n o t b e r e c e i v e d i n F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 . T h e f o l l o w i n g l i s t d i s c u s s e s t h e s i g n i f i c a n t c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s ( i . e . , b u d g e t e d c o s t s i n e x c e s s o f $ 5 m i l l i o n ) a n d r e l a t e d s t a t u s . C a p i t a l p r o j e c t e x p e n d i t u r e s a r e g e n e r a l l y a f f e c t e d b y l a g s i n i n v o i c e s s u b m i t t e d b y c o n t r a c t o r s a n d c o n s u l t a n t s , a s w e l l a s i s s u e s e n c o u n t e r e d d u r i n g c e r t a i n p h a s e s o f t h e p r o j e c t s . T h e c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s b u d g e t s t e n d t o b e b a s e d o n a g g r e s s i v e p r o j e c t s c h e d u l e s . H i g h w a y E n g i n e e r i n g / C o n s t r u c t i o n / D e s i g n - B u i l d / R i g h t o f W a y / L a n d S R - 9 1 H i g h O c c u p a n c y V e h i c l e L a n e s P r o j e c t C a l t r a n s c o m p l e t e d d e s i g n w o r k a n d e x p e n d i t u r e s r e m a i n w i t h i n t h e b u d g e t a u t h o r i t y . U t i l i t y r e l o c a t i o n c o n t i n u e s , a n d t h e s u b m i t t a l o f i n v o i c e s f o r e x p e n d i t u r e s i n c u r r e d t o d a t e i s l a g g i n g . S t a f f o v e r s e e s r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n , w h i c h h a s b e e n c e r t i f i e d ; f o u r a c q u i s i t i o n s a r e p e n d i n g s e t t l e m e n t s . T h e s u b m i t t a l o f i n v o i c e s f o r u t i l i t y r e l o c a t i o n s a n d r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n s e t t l e m e n t s a r e p e n d i n g . C o n s t r u c t i o n b e g a n i n A p r i l 2 0 1 2 a n d i s m a n a g e d b y C a l t r a n s . 7 1 / 9 1 I n t e r c h a n g e P r o j e c t T h e a v a i l a b i l i t y o f f e d e r a l e a r m a r k f u n d s a l l o w s t h e f i n a l d e s i g n p h a s e o f w o r k t o m o v e f o r w a r d . P r o c u r e m e n t f o r t h e d e s i g n c o n s u l t a n t w a s a w a r d e d a t t h e F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 2 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g . N o t i c e t o p r o c e e d w a s i s s u e d i n M a r c h 2 0 1 2 a n d t h e d e s i g n p h a s e h a s s t a r t e d . F i n a l d e s i g n w a s d e l a y e d d u e t o t h e A r m y C o r p s o f E n g i n e e r ' s e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o c e s s , w h i c h h a s b e e n r e s o l v e d a n d f i n a l d e s i g n i s e x p e c t e d t o b e c o m p l e t e d i n t h e 4 ' h q u a r t e r o f F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 . R i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n h a s n o t b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d a n d i s e x p e c t e d t o s t a r t i n l a t e F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 . S R - 9 1 C I P ( d e s i g n - b u i l d ) T h e C o m m i s s i o n i s a c t i v e l y e n g a g e d i n t h e f i n a n c i n g a c t i v i t i e s f o r t h i s p r o j e c t i n c l u d i n g t h e i s s u a n c e o f s a l e s t a x a n d t o l l r e v e n u e b o n d s A g e n d a I t e m 9 B 9 7 and funding of a TIFIA loan in July 2013. With the environmental document approved, full right of way acquisition work is underway, including, as necessary, eminent domain proceedings, and is expected to peak in FY 2013/14. Right of way expenditures for FY 2012/13 are weighted toward the end of the fourth quarter due to the long lead time to close escrow on property purchases. Agency, utility, and railroad agreement work continues with several agreements remaining to be completed. Contract award for the design -build portion of work was awarded in May 2013 (fourth quarter), one month later than estimated at the beginning of FY 2012/13. A limited notice to proceed (NTP) was issued concurrent with the contract award and included early deliverables and mobilization. 1-15 CIP - Staff is working with the consultant to finalize an updated schedule and budget for the revised project scope that the Commission approved in January 2013. Staff is proceeding to develop a project report and environmental document. This project is expected to remain under budget as a result of the revised project scope. 1-215 Central Widening Project from Scott Road to Nuevo Road - Final design and right of way acquisitions related to the project are complete. Advertising for the construction bids occurred in the first quarter of FY 2012/13. The NTP for construction was issued December 10, 2012, with the first working day starting in January 2013. Invoices for expenditures incurred to date are now being °submitted by the contractor, and the construction costs are expected to be within budget for FY 2012/13. Rail Engineering/Construction/Right of Way/Land PVL Project Final design is complete. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) continues working on finalizing the Small Starts grant agreement. Major outstanding right of way acquisition activity continues for the station and layover facility at south Perris. Construction is pending the receipt of the FTA Small Starts grant agreement and the resolution' of legal challenges to the Environmental Impact Report. Staff will continue to monitor the revenues and expenditures and will notify the Commission of any unusual events. Attachment: Quarterly Financial Statements March 2013 • • Agenda Item 9B 98 Revenues Sales tax Federal reimbursements State reimbursements Local reimbursements Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Other revenues Interest Total revenues RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3131/2013 FY 2012/13 3RD QUARTER BUDGET ACTUAL $ 224,712,500 73,151,900 17,917,800 2,688,700 7,557,300 882,800 7,265,900 $ 130,721,746 3,369,319 4,469,704 652,703 7,148,332 1,109,159 3,765,642 334,176,900 151,236,605 Expenditures Salaries and benefits 6,971,100 4,644,842 Professional and support Professional services 15,340,750 7,107,604 Support costs 5,315,340 2,605,321 Total Professional and support costs 20,656,090 9,712,925 Projects and operations Program operations - general Engineering Construction Design Build Right of way/land Operating and capital disbursements Special studies Local streets and roads Regional arterials Total projects and operations 18,880,500 27,931,510 125,340,100 29,050,000 112,183,795 97,835,790 850,000 42,129,000 16,455,400 470,656,095 Debt service Principal 126,800,000 Interest 16,613,000 Total debt service 143,413,000 Capital outlay 469,200 9,533,554 7,703,824 12,402,399 12,431,686 27,843,898 56,264,167 171,871 24,777,709 3,579,364 154,708,472 9,145,412 9,145,412 69,535 Total Expenditures 642,165,485 178,281,186 Excess revenues over(under)expenditures (307,988,585) (27,044,581) Other financing sources/(uses) Operating transfer in Operating transfer out Debt proceeds Total financing sources/(uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balance July 1, 2012 Fund balance March 31, 2013 328,118,590 (328,118,590) 1,220,172,000 1,220,172,000 912,183,415 556,693,300 $ 1,468,876,715 52,960,977 (52,960,977) 40,000,000 40,000,000 12,955,419 575,578,619 REMAINING BALANCE $ (93,990,754) (69,782,581) (13,448,096) (2,035,997) (408,968) 226,359 (3,500,258) (182,940,295) 2,326,258 8,233,146 2,710,019 10,943,165 9,346,946 20,227,686 112,937,701 16,618,314 84,339,897 41,571,623 678,129 17,351,291 12,876,036 315,947,623 126,800,000 7,467, 588 134,267,588 399,665 463,884,299 484,111, 985 (275,157,613) 275,157,613 (1,180,172,000) 1,180,172,000 1,664,283,985 18,885,319 $ 588,534,038 $ 1,683,169,304 PERCENT UTILIZATION 58% 5% 25% 24% 95% 126% 52% 45% 67% 46% 49% 47% 50% 28% 10% 43% 25% 58% 20% 59% 22% 33% N/A 55% 6% 15% 28/0 9% 16% 16% 3% 3% 1% 103% 40% 99 GENERAL FUND RIVERSIDE COl1S.NSPORTATION COMMISSION OUARTERL T VS ACTUALS BY FUND 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2013 MEASURE A SALES TAX FSP/ WESTERN PALO COACHELLA SAFE COUNTY VERDE VALLEY VALLEY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) COMMERCIAL SALES TAX PAPER BONDS • DEBT SERVICE COMBINED TOTAL Revenues Sales tax $ 1,890,000 $ $ 61,285,299 Federal reimbursements 4,060 3,365,259 State reimbursements _ 77,610 2,045,489 2,346,605 Local reimbursements 94,145 38,392 520,166 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee - - 124.182 Other revenues 12,676 586 525,518 Interest 22,999 12,190 385,130 Total revenues 2,101,490 2,096,657 68,552,159 Expenditures Salaries and benefits Professional and support Professional services Support costs Total Professional and support costs Projects and operations Program operations • general Engineering Construction Design Build Right of way/land Operating and capital disbursements Special studies Local streets and roads Regional arterials Total projects and operations Debt service Principal Interest Total debt service Capital outlay Total Expenditures Excess revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources/(uses) Operating transfer in Operating transfer out Debt proceeds Total financing sources/(uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balance July 1, 2012 Fund balance March 31, 2013 $ 575,464 $ 19.663,970 $ 40,463,430 $ 6,843,583 $ $ 7,024,150 - 132,005 438,374 - - 37,306 139,610 86,517 132,306 1,360,469 16,538 575,464 19,701.276 40,603,040 6,930,100 7,288,461 1,798,843 16,538 2,617,324 70,192 1,853,267 - 785 658,505 269,325 5,824,375 1,446 2,009 415 198 083 397,567 2,667,920 467,408 6,221,942 1,446 867,608 1,503,803 6,996,274 34,828 - 6,557,348 5,681,975 - 12,431,686 - 25,808,054 - 8,706,893 3.378,684 - 3,375,000 116,037 55,834 - 17,319,855 575,464 6,882,390 3,579,364 1.572,577 1,572,577 $ 130,721,746 3,369,319 4,469.704 652,703 7, 148,332 1,109.159 3,765,642 151,236 605 103,274 - 4,644,842 353,953 256 354,209 7.107.604 2,605.321 9,712,925 165,869 • 9,533,554 1,111,648 - 7,703,824 • 5.534,900 - 1,185,524 12,402,399 12,431,686 • 699,560 1,140,661 195,623 27.843,898 39,822.923 980,667 - 56,264.167 171,871 24.777,709 3,579,364 9,725,366 1,503,803 78,229,710 575,464 13,836,754 39,822,923 980,667 7,511,977 1,140,661 1,381,147 154,708,472 30,384 39,151 19,879 - 9,125,533 9,145,412 19,879 - 9,125,533 9.145,412 69,535 15,040,994 2,041,403 86,344,070 575,464 13,838.985. 39,822,923 980,667 7,969,460 1,160,540 1,381,147 9,125,533 178.281,186 (12,939,504) 55,254 (17,791,911) 5,862,291 780,117 5,949,433 (680,999) 638,303 '(1,364,609) (7,552,956) (27,044,581) 11,066,401 12,000 30,669,970. - 109,894 11,102,712 52,960,977 (11,597,206) - (11,066,401) - (27.454,181) (1,352,133) (1,491,056) (52.960,977) - 40,000,000 - 40,000,000 11,066,401 12,000 19,072,764 - (11,066,401) 12,655,713 (1,352,133) 9.611,656 40.000,000 (1,873,103) 67,254 1,280,853 - 5,862,291 (10,286,284) 5,949,433 (680,999) 13,294,016 (2.716,742) 2,058,700 12,955,419 13,685,227 7,255,419 240,237,824 556 17,346,594 92,088,969 - 43,854,533 73,224,071 31,143,594 5,651.884 51,089,948 575.578,619 11,812,124 $ 7,322,673 $ 241,518 677 $ 556 $ 23,208,885 $ 81,802,685 $ 49,803,966 $ 72,543,072 $ 44,437,610 $ 2,935,142 $ 53,148,648 $ 588,534,038 100 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : M i c h e l e C i s n e r o s , A c c o u n t i n g a n d H u m a n R e s o u r c e s M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : A p p r o p r i a t i o n s L i m i t f o r F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o a d o p t R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 - 0 0 9 , " R e s o l u t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n E s t a b l i s h i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s A p p r o p r i a t i o n s L i m i t f o r F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 " . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : S e c t i o n 7 9 1 0 o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a G o v e r n m e n t C o d e i m p l e m e n t s A r t i c l e X I I I B o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o n s t i t u t i o n b y r e q u i r i n g e a c h l o c a l j u r i s d i c t i o n t o e s t a b l i s h , b y r e s o l u t i o n , i t s a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t f o r e a c h f i s c a l y e a r a n d t o m a k e d o c u m e n t a t i o n u s e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t a v a i l a b l e t o t h e p u b l i c 1 5 d a y s p r i o r t o a d o p t i o n o f t h e r e s o l u t i o n e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t . S t a f f p e r f o r m e d t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s n e c e s s a r y t o d e t e r m i n e t h e l i m i t . T h e r e s o l u t i o n a n d d o c u m e n t s s u p p o r t i n g t h e c a l c u l a t i o n a r e a t t a c h e d . T h e C o m m i s s i o n c h o s e t o u s e t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n t h e C a l i f o r n i a p e r c a p i t a l p e r s o n a l i n c o m e a n d t h e p o p u l a t i o n c h a n g e w i t h i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a s t h e f a c t o r s i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t . A s r e q u i r e d , t h e a d o p t i o n o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 A p p r o p r i a t i o n s L i m i t w a s p o s t e d i n t h e l o c a l n e w s p a p e r . A t t a c h m e n t s : 1 ) R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 - 0 0 9 2 ) C a l i f o r n i a P e r C a p i t a l I n c o m e a n d P o p u l a t i o n , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t m e n t o f F i n a n c e A g e n d a I t e m 9 C 1 0 1 " " ' ' ' 1 4 T O R A l b �� a ` ' L t r o D E P A R T M E N T O F i T - I N A N C E O F F I C E O F T H E D I R E C T O R M a y 2 0 1 3 D e a r F i s c a l O f f i c e r : E D M U N D G . B R O W N J R . " G O V E R N O R S T A T E C A P I T O L �% R O O M 1 1 4 5 �% S A C R A M E N T O C A �% 9 5 6 1 4 - 4 9 9 6 �% W W W . 0 0 R . C A . G O V S u b j e c t : P r i c e a n d P o p u l a t i o n I n f o r m a t i o n A p p r o p r i a t i o n s L i m i t T h e C a l i f o r n i a R e v e n u e a n d T a x a t i o n C o d e , s e c t i o n 2 2 2 7 , m a n d a t e s t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f F i n a n c e t o t r a n s m i t a n e s t i m a t e o f t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n p o p u l a t i o n t o l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t s . E a c h l o c a l j u r i s d i c t i o n m u s t u s e t h e i r p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n p o p u l a t i o n f a c t o r f o r J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 3 , i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h a c h a n g e i n t h e c o s t o f l i v i n g , o r p r i c e f a c t o r , t o c a l c u l a t e t h e i r a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t f o r f i s c a l y e a r 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 . A t t a c h m e n t A p r o v i d e s t h e c h a n g e i n C a l i f o r n i a ' s p e r c a p i t a p e r s o n a l i n c o m e a n d a n e x a m p l e f o r u t i l i z i n g t h e p r i c e f a c t o r a n d p o p u l a t i o n p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e f a c t o r t o c a l c u l a t e t h e 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t . A t t a c h m e n t B p r o v i d e s c i t y a n d u n i n c o r p o r a t e d c o u n t y p o p u l a t i o n p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e . A t t a c h m e n t C p r o v i d e s p o p u l a t i o n p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e f o r c o u n t i e s a n d t h e i r s u m m e d i n c o r p o r a t e d a r e a s . T h e p o p u l a t i o n p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e d a t a e x c l u d e s f e d e r a l a n d s t a t e i n s t i t u t i o n a l i z e d p o p u l a t i o n s a n d m i l i t a r y p o p u l a t i o n s . P o p u l a t i o n P e r c e n t C h a n g e f o r S p e c i a l D i s t r i c t s S o m e s p e c i a l d i s t r i c t s m u s t e s t a b l i s h a n a n n u a l a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t . C o n s u l t t h e R e v e n u e a n d T a x a t i o n C o d e s e c t i o n 2 2 2 8 f o r f u r t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t . A r t i c l e X I I I B , s e c t i o n 9 ( C ) , o f t h e S t a t e C o n s t i t u t i o n e x e m p t s c e r t a i n s p e c i a l d i s t r i c t s f r o m t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t c a l c u l a t i o n m a n d a t e . T h e C o d e a n d t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o n s t i t u t i o n c a n b e a c c e s s e d a t t h e f o l l o w i n g w e b s i t e : h t t o l l l e g i n f o , l e g i s l a t u r e . c a . 9 o v l f a c e s i c o d e s . x h t r n l . S p e c i a l d i s t r i c t s r e q u i r e d b y l a w t o c a l c u l a t e t h e i r a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t m u s t p r e s e n t t h e c a l c u l a t i o n a s p a r t o f t h e i r a n n u a l a u d i t . A n y q u e s t i o n s s p e c i a l d i s t r i c t s h a v e o n t h i s i s s u e s h o u l d b e r e f e r r e d t o t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e c o u n t y f o r c l a r i f i c a t i o n , o r t o t h e i r l e g a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n , o r t o t h e l a w i t s e l f . N o s t a t e a g e n c y r e v i e w s t h e l o c a l a p p r o p r i a t i o n s l i m i t s . P o p u l a t i o n C e r t i f i c a t i o n T h e p o p u l a t i o n c e r t i f i c a t i o n p r o g r a m a p p l i e s o n l y t o c i t i e s a n d c o u n t i e s . R e v e n u e a n d T a x a t i o n C o d e s e c t i o n 1 1 0 0 5 . 6 m a n d a t e s F i n a n c e t o a u t o m a t i c a l l y c e r t i f y a n y p o p u l a t i o n e s t i m a t e t h a t e x c e e d s t h e c u r r e n t c e r t i f i e d p o p u l a t i o n w i t h t h e S t a t e C o n t r o l l e r ' s O f f i c e . F i n a n c e w i l l c e r t i f y t h e h i g h e r e s t i m a t e t o t h e S t a t e C o n t r o l l e r b y J u n e 1 , 2 0 1 3 . P l e a s e N o t e : P r i o r y e a r ' s c i t y p o p u l a t i o n e s t i m a t e s m a y b e r e v i s e d . I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s r e g a r d i n g t h i s d a t a , p l e a s e c o n t a c t t h e D e m o g r a p h i c R e s e a r c h U n i t a t ( 9 1 6 ) 3 2 3 - 4 0 8 6 . A N A J . M A T O S A N T O S D i r e c t o r B y : M I C H A E L C O H E N C h i e f D e p u t y D i r e c t o r A t t a c h m e n t 1 0 2 May 2013 Attachment A A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their goveming body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2013-14 appropriation limit is: Per Capita Personal Income Fiscal Year (FY) Percentage change over prior year 2013-14 5.12 Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2013-14 appropriation limit. 2013-14: Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 5.12 percent Population Change = 0.79 percent Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: Population converted to a ratio: Calculation of factor for FY 2013-14: 5.12 + 100 = 1.0512 100 0.79 + 100 = 1.0079 100 1.0512 x 1.0079 = 1.0595 103 " F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 A t t a c h m e n t B A n n u a l P e r c e n t C h a n g e i n P o p u l a t i o n M i n u s E x c l u s i o n s " J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 t o J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 3 a n d T o t a l P o p u l a t i o n , J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 3 T o t a l C o u n t y P e r c e n t C h a n g e - � P o p u l a t i o n M i n u s E x c l u s i o n s - - P o p u l a t i o n C i t y 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 1 - 1 - 1 2 1 - 1 - 1 3 1 - 1 - 2 0 1 3 R i v e r s i d e B a n n i n g 0 . 4 0 3 0 , 0 5 1 3 0 , 1 7 0 3 0 , 1 7 0 B e a u m o n t 2 . 0 8 3 8 , 9 6 6 3 9 , 7 7 6 3 9 , 7 7 6 B l y t h e 0 , 6 4 1 3 , 3 7 0 1 3 , 4 5 5 1 9 , 6 0 6 C a l i m e s a 0 . 9 0 8 , 0 2 2 8 , 0 9 4 8 , 0 9 4 C a n y o n L a k e 0 . 4 4 1 0 , 7 2 1 1 0 , 7 6 8 1 0 , 7 6 8 C a t h e d r a l C i t y 0 . 4 3 5 2 , 0 5 7 5 2 , 2 8 3 5 2 , 3 3 7 C o a c h e l l a 1 . 7 9 4 2 , 0 3 0 4 2 , 7 8 4 4 2 , 7 8 4 C o r o n a 1 . 1 9 1 5 4 , 9 8 5 1 5 6 , 8 2 3 1 5 6 , 8 2 3 D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s 0 . 3 9 2 7 , 7 2 1 2 7 , 8 2 8 2 7 , 8 2 8 E a s t v a l e 2 . 6 6 5 5 , 7 7 0 5 7 , 2 5 1 5 7 , 2 5 1 H e m e t 0 . 6 8 8 0 , 3 2 9 8 0 , 8 7 7 8 0 , 8 7 7 I n d i a n W e l l s 0 . 6 1 5 , 0 5 0 5 , 0 8 1 5 , 0 8 1 I n d i o 3 . 9 5 7 8 , 2 9 8 8 1 , 3 9 3 8 1 , 3 9 3 J u r u p a V a l l e y 0 . 5 2 9 6 , 7 4 5 9 7 , 2 4 6 9 7 , 2 4 6 L a k e E l s i n o r e 4 . 2 4 5 3 , 0 3 8 5 5 , 2 8 5 5 5 , 4 3 0 L a Q u i n t a 0 . 5 5 3 8 , 1 9 0 3 8 , 4 0 1 3 8 , 4 0 1 M e n i f e e 1 . 8 1 8 0 , 8 3 1 8 2 , 2 9 2 8 2 , 2 9 2 M o r e n o V a l l e y 0 . 5 3 1 9 7 , 0 8 6 1 9 8 , 1 2 9 1 9 8 , 1 2 9 M u r r i e t a 0 . 5 1 1 0 5 , 3 0 0 1 0 5 , 8 3 2 1 0 5 , 8 3 2 N o r c o 0 . 4 2 2 3 , 0 8 5 2 3 , 1 8 3 2 6 , 6 2 6 P a l m D e s e r t 0 . 6 7 . 4 9 , 6 1 9 4 9 , 9 4 9 4 9 , 9 4 9 P a l m S p r i n g s 0 . 6 6 4 5 , 4 1 4 4 5 , 7 1 2 4 5 , 7 1 2 P e r r i s 0 . 8 1 7 0 , 3 9 1 7 0 , 9 6 3 7 0 , 9 6 3 R a n c h o M i r a g e 0 . 4 7 1 7 , 5 5 6 1 7 , 6 3 9 1 7 , 6 3 9 R i v e r s i d e 0 . 8 2 3 0 9 , 3 4 8 3 1 1 , 8 9 6 3 1 1 , 9 5 5 S a n J a c i n t o 0 . 6 2 4 4 , 9 3 7 4 5 , 2 1 7 4 5 , 2 1 7 T e m e c u l a 1 . 4 3 1 0 3 , 4 0 3 1 0 4 , 8 7 9 1 0 4 , 8 7 9 W i l d o m a r 1 . 0 8 3 2 , 8 1 8 3 3 , 1 7 4 3 3 , 1 7 4 U n i n c o r p o r a t e d 0 . 3 2 3 5 7 , 3 3 5 3 5 8 , 4 7 3 3 5 8 , 8 2 7 C o u n t y T o t a l 1 . 0 1 2 , 2 2 2 , 4 6 6 2 , 2 4 4 , 8 5 3 2 , 2 5 5 , 0 5 9 ' E x c l u s i o n s i n d u d e r e s i d e n t s o n f e d e r a l m i l i t a r y i n s t a H a t i o n s a n d g r o u p q u a r t e r s r e s i d e n t s i n m e n t a l i n s t i t u t i o n s , s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l c o r r e c t i o n a l i n s t i t u t i o n s a n d v e t e r a n h o m e s . 1 0 4 RESOLUTION NO. 13-009 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution places an annual limitation upon appropriations from proceeds of taxes by each local government of the State of California; and WHEREAS, in 1988, pursuant to Article XIIIB, section 4 of the California Constitution, the Riverside County Transportation Commission established its appropriations limit at $75 million for fiscal year 1988-1989 under ordinance No. 88-1; and WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the California Government Code implements Article XIIIB of the California Constitution by requiring each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, its appropriations limit for each fiscal year and to make the documentation used in determining the appropriations limit available to the public fifteen days prior to adoption of the resolution establishing the appropriations limit; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Senate Constitutional Amendment No. 1 approved by the voters of the State effective June 6, 1990, beginning with fiscal year 1990-1991 and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Commission's Board of Commissioners is required to select either the percentage change in California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll due to the addition of local non-residential construction, and either the population change within the Commission or the population change within Riverside County, as the two factors to be applied in calculating the appropriations limit for each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this Board wishes to select, as factors in determining the Commission's appropriation Limit for fiscal year 2013-2014 the percentage change in California per capita personal income and also the population change within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, this Commission has documented its calculations of the Commission's appropriations limit for fiscal year 2013-2014 and said calculations have been made available to the public at least fifteen days prior to the adoption of this resolution. 105 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Riverside County Transportation Commission as follows: 1. For fiscal year 2013-2014, the factors selected for calculating the appropriations limit are (a) the percentage change in California per capita personal income, and (b) the population change within the County of Riverside. 2. The appropriations limit applicable to this Agency pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for fiscal year 2013-2014 are hereby established and determined to be $370,426,988. 3. A copy of the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2013-2014 shall be affixed hereto and shall be available for public inspection. 4. Pursuant to Section 7910 of the California Government Code, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the establishment of the appropriations limit as set forth herein must be commenced within forty-five days of the adoption of this resolution. ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 106 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 A P P R O P R I A T I O N S L I M I T 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 A p p r o p r i a t i o n s L i m i t $ 3 4 8 , 8 6 1 , 3 8 2 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 a d j u s t m e n t : C h a n g e i n C a l i f o r n i a p e r c a p i t a p e r s o n a l i n c o m e = 5 . 1 2 % C h a n g e i n P o p u l a t i o n , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y = 1 . 0 1 % P e r C a p i t a l C o s t o f L i v i n g c o n v e r t e d t o a r a t i o : 5 . 1 2 + 1 0 0 = 1 . 0 5 1 . 2 1 0 0 P o p u l a t i o n c o n v e r t e d t o a r a t i o : 1 . 0 1 + 1 0 0 = 1 . 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 C a l c u l a t i o n o f f a c t o r f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 : 1 . 0 5 1 2 x 1 . 0 1 0 1 = 1 . 0 6 1 8 1 7 1 2 $ 3 4 8 , 8 6 1 , 3 8 2 X 1 . 0 6 1 8 1 7 1 2 = $ 3 7 0 , 4 2 6 , 9 8 8 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 A p p r o p r i a t i o n s L i m i t $ 3 7 0 , 4 2 6 , 9 8 8 S o u r c e : C a l i f o r n i a p e r c a p i t a i n c o m e - C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t m e n t o f F i n a n c e P o p u l a t i o n , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t m e n t o f F i n a n c e RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Anne Hallberg, Accounting Supervisor THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached are the quarterly investment and cash flow reports as required by state law and Commission policy. The county of Riverside's Investment Report for the month ended March 31, 2013, is also attached for review. Attachments: 1) Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013 2) County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ended March 31, 2013 Agenda Item 9D 108 " " S t a t e m e n t o f C o m p l i a n c e B o n d P r o j e c t s N a t u r e o f I n v e s t m e n t s , 2 . 0 5 % O p e r a t i n g F u n d s 8 1 . 6 8 % D e b t R e s e r v e 1 . 6 7 % T r u s t F u n d s 1 4 . 6 0 % L A I F P o r t f o l i o I n v e s t m e n t T y p e 0 . 6 5 % M u t u a l F u n A l l o f t h e a b o v e i n v e s t m e n t s a n d a n y i n v e s t m e n t d e c i s i o n s m a d e f o r t h e q u a r t e r e n d e d M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 w e r e i n f u l l c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s i n v e s t m e n t p o l i c y a s a d o p t e d o n J u n e 7 , 2 0 1 2 . T h e C o m m i s s i o n h a s a d e q u a t e c a s h f l o w s f o r s i x m o n t h s o f o p e r a t i o n s . S i g n e d b y C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r " R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n I n v e s t m e n t P o r t f o l i o R e p o r t P e r i o d E n d e d : M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 F A I R V A L U E R A T I N G C O U P O N P A R P U R C H A S E M A T U R I T Y Y I E L D T O P U R C H A S E M A R K E T U N R E A L I Z E D G A I N M O O D Y S / F I T C H S & P R A T E V A L U E D A T E D A T E M A T U R I T Y C O S T V A L U E ( L O S S ) O P E R A T I N G F U N D S C i t y N a t i o n a l B a n k D e p o s i t s 4 , 9 0 1 , 0 4 0 A 3 / B B B + N / A N / A C o u n t y T r e a s u r e r ' s P o o l e d I n v e s t m e n t F u n d 4 4 8 , 4 6 5 , 9 4 2 A a a / M R 1 / A A A / V 1 N / A 0 . 3 7 % L o c a l A g e n c y I n v e s t m e n t F u n d ( L A I F ) 3 , 6 1 5 , 6 0 3 N o t R a t e d N / A N / A A g e n c y r t r e a s u r y S e c u r i t i e s : S u b t o t a l O p e r a t i n g F u n d s F U N D S H E L D I N T R U S T C o u n t y T r e a s u r e r ' s P o o l e d I n v e s t m e n t F u n d , L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d S u b t o t a l F u n d s H e l d I n T r u s t C O M M I S S I O N B O N D P R O J E C T F U N D S / D E B T R E S E R V E U S B a n k M o n e y M a r k e t I n v e s t m e n t A g r e e m e n t s C o u n t y o r R i v e r s i d e P o o l i n v e s t m e n t F i r s t A m e r i c a n G o v e r n m e n t O b l i g a t i o n F u n d S u b t o t a l B o n d P r o j e c t F u n d s / D e b t R e s e r v e T O T A L A l l C a s h a n d I n v e s t m e n t s 4 5 6 , 9 8 2 , 7 8 5 N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A 8 1 , 7 1 3 , 3 2 5 A a a - M R 1 / A A A / V 1 N / A 8 1 . 7 1 3 . 3 2 5 A a a / A A A m N / A - A a a / M R 1 / A A A / V 1 N / A 2 0 , 8 1 3 , 6 3 4 A a a / A A A m N / A 2 0 , 8 1 3 , 6 3 0 S 5 5 9 , 5 0 9 , 7 4 4 I n v e s t m e n t T r a n s a c t i o n s f o r t h e Q u a r t e r E n d e d M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 P u r c h a s e s : N o n e M a t u r i t i e s : P a r V a l u e a t M a t u r i t y M a t u r i t y D a t e N o n e C o u p o n R a t e 0 . 3 7 % 0 , 3 7 % N / A S U M M A R I Z E D I N V E S T M E N T T Y P E B a n k s C o u n t y P o o l C o u n t y P o o l I n v e s t m e n t L A I F M u t u a l F u n t l s : C N I C h a r t e r U S B a n k M o n e y M a r k e t 4 , 9 0 1 , 0 4 0 5 3 0 , 1 7 9 , 2 6 7 3 . 6 1 5 , 8 0 3 F i r s t A m e r i c a n G o v e r n m e n t O b l i g a t i o n F u n d 2 0 , 8 1 3 6 3 4 S u b - T o t a l M u t u a l F u n d s 2 0 , 8 1 3 , 6 3 4 F e d e r a l A g e n c y s e c u r i t i e s C e r t i f i c a t e s o / D e p o s i t U . S . T r e a s u r y s e c u r i t i e s C o r p o r a t e N o t e / C o m m e r c i a l P a p e r I n v e s t m e n t A g r e e m e n t s T O T A L S 5 5 9 , 5 0 9 . 7 4 4 County of Riverside Treasurer's Pooled Investinen March und "The March of Equities." As we reported in our January commen- tary, this year is turning out to be very interesting indeed with the "January Effect" proving true thus far. As of the close on March 28th, the bellwether Dow Jones Industrial Average had climbed from 13,104 on the close of December 31st to an astound- ing 14,578 at the end of the first quarter; this marks an increase of 1,474 points or 11.25% with other equity indexes showing gains as well. Moreover, none are showing any signs of slowing down. However, with a positive. usually comes a negative and in this case it is anemic Treasury yields. The 2 year rate still is at a paltry 25 bps with the 5 year at 77 bps. It is no wonder many: investors are fleeing to the stock market for a chance at better returns. However, the flip side to this meteoric rise in equity prices is they will cor- rect, at some point. The last time we saw perfor- mance this strong in the first quarter was 1987, and. we all know what happened in October of that ear. So far, the Great Sequestration has not uced the end of the financial world, but it has produced a lot of hot air and rhetoric from D.C. Again, we will have to wait and see how the $85 billion in cuts play out over the coming months. We also witnessed another Eurozone country al- most melt down with the tiny island of Cyprus, money haven de-jour for Russian oligarchs, tem- porarily closing access to banks and ATM's. As the banks were imploding, the ECU, led by the Germans, cut a deal to prop up the tiny country but only after confiscating 30% of deposi- tors holdings in the banks; not a good move when you are trying to build confidence with the finan- cial markets. Last, but not least in our world tour of financial turmoil, well have to see how the sa- ber rattling, unhinged leader of North Korea plays his nuclear hand as he continues to bluster and threaten his southern neighbors and the U.S. All. of these geopolitical events have the ability to shake up our economy and interest rates. As expected, there were no surprises at the March 20th FOMC meeting in which they kept rates unchanged at 0 - 25bps. Although they did change their verbiage somewhat from their earlier stance, the FED stated, "Information received since the FOMC met in January suggests a return to moderate economic growth following a pause late last year. Labor market conditions have shown signs of improvement in recent monthsbut the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending and business fixed investment advanced, and the housing sector has strengthened further, but fiscal policy has become somewhat more re- strictive." In other words, the economy seems to be looking a bit better, but only time will tell. We'll continue to monitor these world -changing events and invest accordingly. Don Kent " Treasurer -Tax Collector Capital Markets Team Don Kent Treasurer -Tax Collector Jon Christensen Asst. Treasurer -Tax Collector Giovane Pizano Investment Manager Erika Clark Asst. Investment Manager Investment Objectives The primary objective of the treasurer shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds under the treasurer's control, meet the liquidi- ty needs of the depositor, and achieve a return on the funds under his or her control. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATED: A la-bf BY MOODY'S INVESTOR'S SERVICE AND AA.A/V1 BY FITCH RATINGS Moran End Market Value (Sy Month Fn1 hook f%Iper Cain or paper Gain Book Yrs to �flotli�i{ ci ;,• s. or Lass (%) - Yield (%) Maturity Duration March February 5,129,896,695.89 5,125,734,196.18 4,898,119,579.11 January 5,090,799,90966 December November irtober 5,999,501,448.83 5,060,842,259.48 4,739,722,977.79 4,893,898,502.93 4,162,499.71 4,221,076.18 5,086,685,931,.93 5,993,822,631.12 5,054,763,131.75 4,734,136,679.88 4,113,977.73 5,678,817.71 6,079,12773 0.08 0.37 1.21 1.20 0.09 0.38 1.20 1.18 0.08 0.37 1.24 1.23. 0.09 0.32 1.01 1.00 0.12 0.39 1.11 1.09 5,586,297.91 0.12 0A2 1.17 1.15 The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is comprised of the County, Schools, Special Districts, and other Discretionary Depositors. 111 112 Current Market Data Economic Indicators release Date Indicator Consensus Actual /08/2013 Non -Farm Payrolls M/M change: Counts the number of paid employees working part- 171,000 236,000 time or full-time in the nation's business and government establishments. 03/ 08/2013 Employment Situation: Measures the number of unemployed as a percentage of the labor force. 03/26/2013 03/28/2013 03/26/2013 03/06/2013 03/15/2013 Durable Goods Orders- M/M change: Reflects the new orders placed with domestic manufacturers for immediate and future delivery of factory hard goods. Real Gross Domestic Product - Q/Q change: The broadest measure of aggregate economic activity and encompasses every sector of the economy. GDP is the country's most comprehensive economic scorecard. Consumer Confidence: Measures consumer attitudes on present economic conditions and expectations of future conditions. Factory Orders M/M change: Represents the dollar level of new orders for both durable and nondurable goods. Consumer Price Index -M/M change:. The Consumer Price index is a measure of the average price level of a fixed basket of goods and services purchased by consumers: Stock Indices Fed Funds Target Rate Change Dow Jones (DJIA) 411,P 500 Index m NASDAQ (NDX) Commodities Nymex'Crude 14,578.54 1,569.19 524.05 54.51 3,267.52 107.33 97.23 5.18 Gold (USD/OZ) $ 1,598.75 19.17 US Treasury Curve (M/M) 12s us Treasury Actives Cunie 03/28/13 3,00 YI25 US Treasury Actives :Curve 02/28/13 1M .., 6h1 ... 2Y 3Y Y 7Y iOY 7.8%_.,.__."7.7% 3.5%----- 5.7% 0.6% 0.4% 67.5 59.7 -2.2% 0.5%` 0.7% Fed Move Probability for FOMC Dates: 05/01 /2013 06/11/2013 Decrease to 0.00% Increase to 0.25% Increase to 050% Increase to 0.75% Increase to 1 % Tenor 0.104! 0.155 0.236 0.344 0.762 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR 1 13 46.0% 54.0% 0.0 % 0.0 46.0 % 54.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1..849. 1,.876 D.02, 7 —NW .3i.10:3 3.086 0.017 2 TIMMI The Treasurer's Institutional Money Market Index (TIMMI) is compiled and reported by the Riverside County Treasurer's Capital Markets division. It is a composite index derived from five AAA rated prime institutional money market funds. Similar to the Tre urer's Office, prime money market funds invest in a diversified portfolio of U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments eluding U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, commercial paper, certificates of deposits, repurchase agreements, etc. TIMMI is cur- rently comprised of the five multi billion dollar funds listed below. AAA Rated Prime Institutional Monev-Market runds Fidelity Prime Institutional MMF Federated Prime Obligations Fund Wells Fargo Advantage Heritage Morgan Stanley Institutional Prime Liquidity Fund B1ackRock Prime Cash Fund 1.00% - 0.80% - 0.60% - 0.48% 0.44% 0.46% 0.45% 0.42% 0.42% 0.42% 0.43% o 0 39/0 0.37% 0.38% 0.38% 0.40% - - = 0.32% 0.20% - 0.00% FIPXX PO1XX W FJ XX...... M PFXX BPIXX 0.17% 0.17% 0.16% 0.17% 0.16% 0.16% 0.17% 0.16% 0.14% Mar-12 Cash Flows May-12 Jul-12 Sep-12 Nov-12 O. 4% 0.11% 0.12% 0.11% Jan-13 Mar-13 Monthly Monthly Month Reseipts I3isbursemen Difference Required Matured westraents Actual vailale nvestm.ents to Invest > Maturing 1. Year 04/2013 04/2013� 05/2013 06./ 2013 07/ 2013 08/ 2013 09/2-013 1,379.60 663.29 868.06 668.62 675.66 _821.92. 1,199.59 1,114.1.9 913A0 717.29 752.21 40/2013 665.00 801.26 557.68 (536.30) (524.65) „ W _-456.25 .V , (45.34) (48.67) (76.55) _ (136.26) -11 / 2013 862.54 710.0.0152.54 42/2013 1539,11 813.4<1 's 0'1/2014 676.58 02�2014 i1312014 1,293.98 6e;00 820 0D f_, 839:70 . 82045 45.34 . 48.67 76.55 136.26 ` ismen•Pool Yield ItreitusTIMMI 604.70 560.30 68.40 542.99 - 444.63 152.54 212.99 202.50 215.00 260,00 104.60 72570' (617.40) (26D00) 19 .5 , '878.24-105.10 260.84 365.00 O. 250 3,0 65 00. TOTALS 9,987.70 10,777.70 (790.00) 763.07 3,328.11 14.89' 64.93 % All values reported in millions ($). 4,362.66 85.1ro The Pooled Investment Fund cash flow requirements are based upon a 12 month historical cash flow model. Based upon projected cash receipts and maturing investments, there are sufficient funds to meet future cash flow disbursements over the next 12 months. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR 1 14 3 Asset Allocation OPOS MMKT CALTRUST FND DDA/PASSBK LOCAL AGCY OBLIG US TREAS BONDS FHLMC DISC NOTES FHLMC BONDS FNMA DISC NOTES FNMA BONDS FHLB DISC NOTES FHLB BONDS FFCB DISC NOTES FFCBVBONDS :M FARMER MAC MUNI BONDS COMM PAPER NCDS 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 500.000.00 0.00 300,000.00 135,000.00 54,000.00. 13,000.00 510.00 645,000.00 75,000.00 543,725.00 25,000.00: 877,882.00 140,000.00` 1,221,735.00 10,000.00 433,895.00: 152,218.00 63,620.00 235,000.00 200,000.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 510.00 510.00 645,187.11 645,4 24.5 0 74,939.28 74,963.50 543,500.19 544,755.10. 24,961.50 24,996.25'' 878,143.98 879,476.70 139,722.20 139,973.53 1,221,996.54, 1,222,758.58 9,981.11 9,997.10 433,937.55434,141.62 152,203.39' 152,255.02 63,740.78 63,740.78 234,904.08 234,897.52 200,006.49 200,006.49 DDA/PASSBK US 'TREAS BLINDS FHLMC DISC NOTES FHLMC BONDS FNMA DISC NOTES FNMA BONDS ifell Scheduled Bock an Market • FHLB DISC NOTES FHLB BONDS • FMB DISC NOTES FFCB BONDS MUNI BOND Z eduled'Bttarkets 300,000.00 300,000.00 100.00 % 135,000.00 135,000.00 100.00 % 54,000.00' 54,000.00 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.04 % 100.03 % 100.23% 100.14 % 100.15 % 100.15 % 100.06% 100.16 100.05 %'s 100.03%; 100.00% 100.00 %; 100.00 % SCHEDU. i REPO5-6% �1 MT - ■ il 01LTRUST216- I% • ODWPASSOC-0% 111R LOCAL PACE MID En 'US TEAS BOWS - • 1111DISCi4D -I% • ficmc I - ilk clo FI0 4 DISC sorts D% 0.10 % •004' 004 0.11 % .003 .003 0.42% .003 .003 0.08 % .003 .003 0.88% 7.214 7.214 0.21 % .817'_ .817 0.13 % .534 .534 0.55 %' 1.348" 1.888 0.18 % .252 .252 0.71 %° .937 3.218 0.20 % .273 .273~ 0.36 % 635 .714 0.19% - .414 = M.414 0.33% 1.133 1.133 0.45% .658., . i.7a1.1, 0.42% .510 .510 0.14% .180 .180 0.17% .205" .205 0 FAIT 4ia KtiMABONDS - iJgb giu FT; d DISCfiDTES - 3% me FHilI 93RDS - 24% iagi FfCB DISC ROTES - 0% c= F'FiI4BONDS- 8% FARMER MAC -3% =I MUM ROODS -1% COPO4 PORT - S3/4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR 1 15 4 Maturity Distribution REPOS MMKT CALTRUST FND DD A / PASSBK LOCAL AGCY OBLIG US TREAS BONDS FHLMC DISC NOTES. FHLMC BONDS FNMA DISC NOTES FNMA BONDS FHLB DISC NOTES FHLB BONDS 25,000.00 FFCB DISC NOTES _ _ FFCB BONDS FARMER MAC MUNI BONDS COMM PAPER �• NCDS w - 505,000.00 140,000.00 - 75,000.00 100,000.00 447,500.00 20,000.00 300,000.00 135,000.00 54,000.00 13,000.00 10,000.00 . 171,100.00 132,000.00 171,000.00 ~ 09,625:00 25,000.00 130,000 00 40,000 00 65,000 00 571,585.00 80,000.00 0 x 10,000.0- 143,895.00 215,000.00 35,000.00 «<� 15,000.00 22,50000 40,000 00 15,000 00 33, 1-8 0 241,850.00 55,300.00 441,032.00 42,350.00 10,000.00 26,000.00? 8,300.00 27,620.00 3,595.00 22,105.00 2,000.00. 170,000.00 200,000.00 YEAR MATURITY - 135,000.00 54,000.00 13,000.00 ~ 510.00 510.00 - 645,000.00 - 75. 000. 0'- 543,725.00 25,000.00 877,882.00 140,000100 1221,735.00 1=0,00000 433,895..00 152,21$�00. - 63,620.00 3500700 ` 200,000.00 -Sebedisied Par tM= MIXT , SChtdadied Par .x CAIRUST ifitO ^ Schectuied Pei. ti0a/PASSIPC- Par DDPar ROM atICYOS IG-SO*Pataad Pate' ISalnl OS'TRUS AONDS - Stheduks# Rat mow i!#.MC DISC MOWS -Sled Par Male FAL/ C NMM Par Y3 DL5CMOTES-Sits - P8r otiame FPNA DODDS- SchaddedPar mama 1161:6 DI .0 MOWS - Scheduled Par .,.,:,k iM:$S-. parr NAM iFt;M DISC NODS-Sdse,uiril Par iiCB BONDS-Sdtiadided Par DOW POWER MAC-Scts.da ei Par IM i aodDYs- _ScheADad Par mama COMM PAPER - StIveti 11 Par UMW Mans -Scheduled Par RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR 1 16 5 Credit Quality Aaa Aa • Aai Aa2 Aa3 NR "... • AAA AA+ AA _. _. AA- NR • 4,279,502.00 10,000.00 157,140.00 15 915.00 197,300.00 465,728.00 MOODY'S BOOK % 11111 Aa•84% NNW -I% EVA-4e 1.Aa-V. [IOW-Cr* MPG -CM 657,500.00 3,774,142.00 23,430.00. 204,285.00 465,728.00 4,279,628.61 9,997.85 4,283,714.92 10,020.60 157,146.49 157,146.49 16,038.52 16,038.52 197,209.34�4- .r_..197,211.14 465,713.39 658,497.38 3,773,181.15 24,050:78 204,291.49 465,713.34 465,765.02 100.10% 100.23% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.01 % S&P BOOK % Mg AAA-•13*'u rz3 AA.-qa8 �A44-74% al Nit -Pt EOM 4 th 659,308.09 3,776,481.32. 204,291.49 465,765.02 0.40 % 0.62 % 0.21 % 0.40 % 0.19% 0.21./a... 100.12% 0.54% 100.09% 0.38% 100.00% 0.38 % 100.00% 100,01 % 0.18% 021 % RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR 1 1 7 6 118 8 d g 888. H O 8 8$ 88 888 §§§ 888 888888 §§§gg.g uW8 g-§ " " " " 8.8.8.8.8.8 888888 888888 ggggkg ggiff g8g 8888 888888 ggg 888 ggg8gg e� s,o° pB' 888 RRR O 8 O a8a 222 41.11. C C L f~G L L a a � . m 0 m m " w w w LTRUST FN § §.k! .1 § §��"tea^ s �^A •+ N P 'n ^ N DD M R E aMO, M P aM0_ OMO. M Y] MN WN - W 8 N N-1;5O 1� $ �' n T% n eN-i W R V N a n$$ ^ t o-q$ 8888888888888888888888888888 gAggkkkkkgAkkkgAMAkkUkkkA �O �O T@ N n T �O ^^ M M RgAIRRiMg.Ros iR4g4Mig:so NRR,9NNRlONNNNNXiIRRRggg RRRNNRR $ $ $ $ $ $ O $ $ $ $ $ $ O O $ $ $ S O O 8888888888888888888888888888 8t2!KrM'8"3.°`!$kc74.7 6 $ 4$K&W?$88$�$8 §g���WERaaREW02%k0§Mg8 ViRggrnoga^psgg§§ gsNsrigso Nz9:e NNNNNNNNF�RNNNNgRgNN ; $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ggg§g§gyyp�§NggNiy� ggV1§ ,§gg�gN§�gggddggg§ N R R'ON N N N N N N N N N n R R N NNN 8 R M N N R R MR,qMU L'4Q RRARV ARMA RRRR�RRRRRRRR ^ O pp pp \ \ p\mp \ \ O\Opp op \ op \ o \ pp op \ \ Q\Q \ \ ^ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ onooco00oonoo00oononoonoo00o zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 22222222Om°SS°22222222222922 tL m 0� 9 m m m D7 m 9 m r r M r r r r r r} r r r r r r r r r r r r r rr r r r C C K C C C C C C C C C CL D C C C C C C C C C C C C C C " " " y " " " y " " " " " " " " " " " Q�QQQQQQ<QQQQQQ.1.1" "QQQW" "QQQQQ41Q w w w w w w w L. w w w w w w w w w w w w w I, w w w C C C C C C C C C C C C C a' C C C a' C C C C C C C C C C ZDDDDDD=vi Irjy Dn yDvi DD DDDD vj vj viDD O m _ QyQ 3 Y M Y m m Z ( g m m (�] N z vi 3 Q 3 a s '.W d C C C " o C {]� y1 Vt JI {yp7 }qC�; C C H V) 4,0,44" NNNi9N�N�NA�7p7 t'$°° @8 N°° y N N N N N N N N N N N N O rN+ r 88 P O\ &FP �8 �g P P N C $$ gg gg LqMMMRTIRF,:r gg 8gn8M� M'74"M N P"W O N A N M n T N N P "" M O '- " " §§ M R g ^Q; n •+ - lV N N N '- '+ r � N 888888R'888$$8888$88$88$.$$8$8$8 8$88$ w §,§o ��§gg§§ggggogg§g���g-84§o,mg§� • 888g8g8ggg888g88$8g88g8888.88,g88g8888 ���o$o����os "O O O N O O N d; N"- ,7-,giN"' a s N f M V' M r",Tof D P P `" e?+ $^^ `� 886.508888888888888888888888888888888 $$$$$$$$$$$$$8$$$$$$8$8$$$$$$8$$$$$$ $§8§ MP§ M §§§ §§§&§§k§R§ quik§§§k $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$8$$$$$$$ MM77:. Ug&AMVIMMMU54UM y\�\pp.� pppp ppp\p\\p\ppp .p\ppp �\\gy�pp ��pp ��pp 00pp pppp p\ppO pp ppp\p (� opp �oS\'S'5�8���gg�5\'88008800"0'8�86$SSSSB000 w Iv42 �� m 0 r r `.,:in w w w w j.1 w .: N N N N N y r` r rrr r`rzz zzzz i� i z >—" o ` i i N i lr`V �. in o L,) 3 In r r ).- .)- r r o. r p r r r r r r} r M M M M N N N M M r N M M M M N M M M N N M N N N M N N N U U U U U U V U U U U V U U U U U U V U V U U U V U U U U U U V V U U V 2 2 2 2 2 z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 i 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 i 2 2 J. J J J J J J J J J J J .J J J. J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J y ,...,LL,,L,...,,.Fi=l=. W 4“,,.t LL[ ....u2.LL ........i LL{a2.LL t=i..u2.t2it2it2“ C. z m-po&223;e,,RI. INJiiap'O�33 3'^'^^mZ^^ U�VV NUt'�Umww� Z2za.Z om ,”,< v, y' Q Q Q Q 1� M M N M M M Jw w ii u� uu uuu� u 8 N x" z 2 Agin donth End Po 7,51gWgMaMMAM M FER MUM�� � CI r nl Ci n r � (J r Ci Cl r r N fV !`i N ni tJ N nl ? N N1 N tV Ni [� t+1 trj trj 'nananir N N ni' N N N N N P N M N N M M M M M 8.$$8888��$88$-$$-$$$$$8Mg78 $$8 $$g$$$$$ M§P§§,41§M§AMS§UgE ,F§W§8gg0gg 88888888888$$$$8888888888888$K)88888888 Pg�gg�gg�gMkF,-0§§§§§����iry��� �����Q�QQ§�QQ ,5,1CM�M8gyppg8q8§§§ gdddoog §0§§§§gigs �����i}; a25b §gg§$ 888g8588888888888888ggEPERERRRR4888R88888 8888$88R888888888888888888888n88888888 Mk§k§ F-§§§§§§§ M §§§k8§ §§§§§§§,k s����� §"g§§§§§§g���� ��fi§"§8� M O^^^ O O O N O O P an an an an an N^ N N N N N N T. P M P N M N v O P N N 888888888888888888888g8fjgg8g8ggg8gg8gg8gg8g8gS8S8$8888888SS8S8S88p48g8888888g8g888888888Gp888 0 0 0 k O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �C'� O O O O O O O O O O O O gM 4§ Igo§g§§§gggg4K��� ���ggIgggggg R§M§M M8WAMM§W� m§H§§§ §M§§b�� 8H§MM§§§M §§§§§888 M u, Ler un M a M n. P P M .D uc w s§§q §gRUi.���s sq § 5aa§a§REUiVA §§gV5 \m pN\\\N\N\\\\\\\�\\�ef\\mm�p�ppp \p \\\\\\\\\\ N N N N O N rl O N� O N Chi N N N O O R � Nr.. N N N N N N rN- r O N P P P P M M M 3 sl����$$NNN NNOSO SOUSn000FJr�$$$$���:d .. m T o m w m m m CO CO m m CO m L. ca o 2 2 0 2' rr' :r r>-r r..N N N N N N N r 2MM2 M w N ,t r Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z i, r` Z r rn!,NAr r�raM NN rrrOrrrrrrr,>.- — .rPrrr N M M Ni ni M M N N � � M N N M M Nf M M M M N M P M M M M M M M U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u u u u u U u u U U U U U U U U U U U u J J J J J J J J J 2 2 J 2 J 2 2 ......... J 2J J 2 2 J 2 J 2 J 2J 2J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 u. u. {=i u.. w. 2xxLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL H=. LL 4 4 LL LL 4 LL LL [+_. [+2. [+_. [+2. LLXLL LL LL LL 4 LL Q¢¢¢ P P m u n P M � m SW R 3r- } N 2 Ug m m m' m m m p��1 '^' � P� • M M M M M M¢ M 8 5 ¢ M M 0 M ¢¢ iS u�5� 3 uuciuuciuu � ��uu�uuuuuc�c�� • eiii i.P.M9E9HWLM��e�� MA§MnA M PPP WARLaRRPE N r r r r n n ni N ni 4 C P P 4 ni nl r.. .� P M P P ,4` P P ��asss� 44y&& i8�� 8 A*§8VgAlg ui"gMMQS 7AR� CAM llZ N r ... N N nI r• N N P N P P V a a P N M" P P . P P N 8888888888,8,88888g888g88888.8g8888888888$888888,8,888888 Ms.qM8y8N�88888pBPP�§p.8N8o8888M8���888g8888888888s�g§ N M a N tN�1 N 11'1 N Q N l� („T 00 a4 Nr. tN�1 v n ++ 88888888888g8g888$888888888888888-888g8�g8gg8$88.888g8 88888888888u8888885888;;811111111 M 1���� 118118p88o8,8 ooS6o6 oS��t3�' wo8,,1„ � .„g§b+s,„6"155125:;11, vi vi vi vi v) v) N v1 N N �'i O N O` N Vf O 'A 0 0 0 N �"i N �/) N N N N V1 N O M M �/1 N p M P p• N O O N N N N N P N p �/i ,Y,,AA Ag*H;;:+1Re:B“f2,` R,to,'nVir4.888$888';=:,0188$RitlP9g$^4!$Rg: 8888888888888858888888888888888888888888888888888888 88888888888888888888N8888888888888888888888$888$8888 ,§§§§§gigg§g§&§§§§§P§§§§§M§§§§§§§§§§§§§g§§M§§&§ gggggg 0M ig §g5gggggg�s&ggOgggggggggg[gM Uggg O v vi vi vi c vi C N Vf N N O N P !� O P P O M N vi N Vf a N N N N O N P u1 P O vi O O N N N N N P M P N N r 8$g8Ei$$g$8$8$8$8$8$8$888$8$8$8$g$g8g$g$g$g$888$8$$$88$�a8+�8888$$$$$g$8888888$$a8$$8$$8$$8$8$8$8$8$8$ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O. O O O� O O O O O O O O O O O k O O O� O� O O O O O. O M M M M M M M P M M en M M. P M M M. M M P P a P P M M of in P N N 0 N N N N M N N N N M. N N N lh -N . §§§ M—IZ R §E RR§A5R§RM§BBM§a§.§§a§c9sa§8§RE88Eaaa \\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\ \ � m 0 0 0 0 0 0 -i 2 0 0 0 0 0 W W W t ',er m 41 to ^^ W m m M m m m m m W m m f� O m m- p zzzzzzr}zzzz r zzz`zz zz zzzzzzzzzzzzzz r� M M M M M� Nf M trr� tr'1.Hr1 tr'1 N ar, Cr'1 N F N N Cr'1 rr1 Cr'1 � K� er�1 M n tr'1 nr1 trr� N fV trn Nrt Vr1 Cr'1 N N N H N N N er�1 P N N N N N P ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ f 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 I i i I i i i 2 f f 2 2 i a i 2 i f i 1 i Z i i 2 2 f i f f 2 f f fZ i i f i 2 i 2 2 M M EKEEEKEEEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEREEEEEEEEEE Q pry ��pp pp oo pp y}�r� , 2J( S S S N N X Y� N N L L L>> U L i U M j O J In L V N Z `L � a E E E'E G U P N M X Q. m �t�ytt„ P P P M M M �n> Mmm <8 td� 2 m Y�' Y YY i� oc �. EsKOCCL7 �>>Z ¢aaa�aa ¢¢g¢� ¢.¢ ¢ �¢ ¢¢.¢oo.¢ qu yq( yq(gy qy qu (o�yq((0�qu yq((0� qy �q{ ,qQ{ C0�C07 �.o-�n��nMF�2%. �� g MVa! 5?5?5? �Si�SRi�SiRnSi.i��.�ric�{�Si+�me3e�{�e� 2 .7 N1 M 1VERISIDE COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COL vlonth End Portfoli A g Q c g g WEiQ , N a Q a a a a a a N n4 fJ [V CI Nf H1 a CI a N Q a a N N tJ lV CI a N ni N CI CI a s a N Q N Q a a N N Q N a Q a Cl CI 4 a a a a Q N Q r6 Q Q a en a Q <n c6 a Q Q Yn N 0 ! E^ n N `OM@ MU O F A m R M i R PH M I W R R M E R M M P§ Q Q OBE .M i R a 4 -? N N N N N F. (6 Q N Q N Q4 4 fV CI CI N N Q N N N N N a Q4 CI Q N Q 4 Q N N@ lV a Q a Cl CI a a a Q a a N Q [•f Q Q a 1n Q a Q to Hf Q Q a Q Q Nl 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g 8 8 8 g g 8 8 8§ g 8$ 8 8 g 8 0 8 8 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 H 8 8 8 8$ 0 0 $$ 0 8 0 8 T O 8 0 $$ 8 8$ 8$$ §W§0og� "�§Mg?;p000Mgggg88A.8gWO§M R?R§sgOOgg-§M§MgZPROM§§1§1. 8 ° N CI Q •O N 8 88888888888888888888884°.8888888828888888$8888888888888888888888888$88888888888p88 gg4k��gg g g 84g��kg ilEg§gk$kakMkkiK44 R§.§§ g§� 4 gkkk4W4:4,KP K4WM ' gsssosoggy§5§g§4aZ§ggsg44.g§§§� loguivoggsog����g�,gggmovsg�QogogH4K5F5'ne a < V A N Ci G N N N N N p` N ui C Ci N N N N P N u'i W N N c T P O� T Q a T P v N cC p p P N N N a o a P Q- P Q Q N p P N N O O O N O O O [NCI CI A N N lN`1 N Al N O gl 44 O S 68 O P O P O O ONE, V D; °; 1��, P 8 P P V$ A V O g P N N" P P M P LO K O; N T rP-, Q d; �$ N, r N �� N N N r4,, N 8 RI s $ N$ O n N A .0.,., 888ggg888888888888 "g" 8������8����8�88" 88g88�� " " g88�88g8888888888888888'• ggg 8888888888$88888,88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888.88888888888888,88.8 g8Rgggg§g3§g§ggMgg§g§§§gg&g:iggggggggg§ggggg§gggg§ggkgggggWgggg§HgM §§ 888888888888888888888888888888$88888 888 8888888 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 8 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 88 8 .8.$8 N OO OO In 0 N N N N O N N OO G e N N of N OO h N W N N N C O O 5 In ^ N G O In m W O O 5 N In N N M O N O Q 5. N N^ O N O O M N O O O N O •D N N N N N O N N N N N ������s888��g���a$s� 8�����o������s�����8��8g����g�gA����g����8p,mg 8�x mim N NY. n n nN v v t\ mn Inv av vRv a v .° at�vnn a Y. N� ..,-..'-ao lnrY�r r� m �° N aq 1,. N N N N N N N N N M •D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N In N N N In. N N W W W M •D W •D W W W M 4D W W W W N W ,D W Z W W W •D W W W •D •D W W W W W M RRRR RRRRRRRRRR.RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \p \ \ \ \ \ •D W N 0 0 r� O W YC�'' 8 \ d\^ N P In O << �p Q Q m' �< N E N pp tail op 2 po 8 N t°_, pp pp pp (C�1 pC1 npp WW pppp W pp pp n Mp N 8�p 11�� I� N P A tWl pp WW 1 R N CI 1 8 N N O CI N N O O C O '- N N N N N N N N N N N f+1 N 1�1 8 f•f N N N t+1 K, t�'I (V N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N C N N N O GOC LOGO G `"� `"5'"OOO5o5ooSlo S'S\'S'o S'o m m oomm0mm }• o mzrN0 rm mrm m m m 0 0 m 22 r rrrrrrrrr rrrNr2rrrrrrrrrrrri^rrrrrrrrrrrSr2rrrrrg2rrrrraz222zaarzz2-rarO r } arr z zzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ zzz,tzzz)=zz zzzrz R<NNNmNNNNmMmMmKQNmNMNNNRmoNmNmnio oNNNnNrNNNFrNrNNNM[NNNNNNteN[foNo4H1NNm NmNN aaaaaaaaaaaa¢aaaaaaaaa¢aaaa¢aaaaaa¢aaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam' 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2-1 2 22 2 2 2 2 i 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 z z z z z z z z z W z W z tzi. z z z z W z z z z Z z z z z W z 2 z z Z Izi. W z z IZi. z tzt Z IZ. z 4 z z Z z z z z W z z z z z z z z uZ. z z z z z {zi z z l+z. z Yz. z z m> iO Z C L' K K r m K W K tN+1 N tV � R R VI d$ 1�1 I(1 Yl .D Pf n n, V1 m m a F E" Wan Rd icY, PP �� n � ������m a 2 4 GM§ A 0 O C �J J A W E E E W i U V U V LL 1= S S a RE.e �g e� 1118 8 8 226 g t+1 H1 N RRR 888 p W OONE� O O O 888 z BBB N M E l rM N1 8 8 , H 8 a 8 8 $ 0 8 MC.55Aoa��f 1§ g^ M R v v N n N 888s8888888 M§§1§M§ UgS.gVgUi • Iri N p` p • N N N N N. Y� r N 0 N* N p R C M 8888g8sgs8 88g88888888 g§Rcgg$iggg N N T T^ N N N N N r 888888888888888g8888 8&80 �pO58O 8&808008O 8OOg O Q 4 O O O Q& Q O J. N t° N O O N N N N N N roUiaiMM to N1 Y� to c•f N N Q Yn Q to RRWRp.RRRpRRRRR M n•fNthrri, J=Tr r} tQ N fn [n fV m m m m m m m m m m m x x x x J x _1 x x x x W� [t=. 4 4 LL� W LL LL 4 vlonth End Portfolio Ho • • • N �p I (� � �O � N a N O 8. a�� M prpry nM'1, fap fy�. U ; ''S yg ei N N 2 N p�� O tttVV N r t+l R1 to • • • P d P d; .+ u� O• V4NL"i@% WA 00 N N d; ,7 c1 C N T r R N $$$$4.$$$$$$88$$$$$$8$$8g$$$$$ �888$,$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$g$$$$$$$$$$$$g$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$g$$$$$g $888$$$$$$.8.$$$$$$$$$$.8.$$$$$$$ $$ $$$$$$8$$ss$$8888$8888$888888888888$$$$$$$888.8$8$88$8$$$$$ 8$$$ AW§§§§§ �§8s §§§§§L§ 8§8 §0s.§8 s8 $§.Hag��� s §.MOA� §. §. 04 §.&Mg§Agg8§$gAgk8 g.§.$§.gg § gIgnI ggggg8gggggggggggggg.sgggggg�k�� s"s"sag"88,s 8 s g�g$k.§.§. kgsN§$§.§1g§.N 0.kkgg.§0.0".gk RRIgkkgkgskg.Q c4 g"o"o"EBCib^8b^oS85oO8 8$88885$O.S8�8$SS$$$Moffi�0�820°.' SS'8^o0, OEF.76:�S865.."8S�S'SSb^b^$Sffi8886880og688� g88888888888888888888888g8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 8N. 8O, 8Cr 8P. 2._8P. 8P. 8.8Nr 8O 8N.8Nr 8^ 8Nr 8P 8.88.88.$88888.888g.,88888$,788888888,8888.�8.8888888888.$8.$ 888fi88$$$$$$88R88888888888O 88O 8R 888.§,§8 g§§§§§§§§§§§§§gRE§5§E�§§PP$§s§§§§§,n§E§§,§§§§.§§§§R§§?g"i§.§§§§§,§§§§§§§§P§R ggg§$ggg§-gggggggggggsggggggog�gggggg5g�gggg�%gg�gggcggggIggggg%I g%gg ulGG GOO O O O O P r NN r r r r 88.888888.8,88888,88.88888.8888.8.88.888888888888888.88.88888888888888888888.888888888888888888888888888888 §§§§,§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§g§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§g§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§g§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§k§ §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§g§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§g§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ 5?�885? yO�yOyOyOO R "' I".8 Y:889,9, 88 S�88S��R�I". 9,5� 5?5?8��881.01"'.81".888�85�5�5�88 RR 88RR5?8 S��$oM 53121285�5�88��pm8�8 n M R Mi M M M M M M M Fn M M Mn Mn M. M M M M M M M M M M m M Mn M M M R M M M M M M N M M R M N M, uN M< M N M M M M M M M M N M M Mn R M M, M M M R M M R Mn M M M M M M R M M M R M M M M N M N M M �m' o R o 0 o R 9 R NO ON pappp R R R R ppR.. R ppR.. o R R R R R R R O O p9p� R R R R S R R f3 R R R ON R o R R R R R R R R R R R R R ON R O R R R R R R R R R R R s o R R.R R R R R R R R R s R R R ON R R R A CI O H W OI r r O R O P O N^ O O r CI H N N O O N N O �n N,I, Sp� Sp� Sp�^ N O O O M M Co �O N cc 2rrf M 4 nVf O^ ,2 oyf� N i N N N N p pp ��pp r � O� 0 0 O N O O r 0� 0 .- O O r N O r r r r O O O f� O r 0 r r .-n O O g 0 0\ r r N N N r r r N N N N N N g 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O N � o o�=o�� �.� �. m ° m rn i Z en en 0 0 0 Z J- � N � >' N ° Z Z r r r! r r r m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J z LLiz r2i i LL LL w LLz LLz w r2i LL LL LL LL LLz LL LL LL Ia2. LL LL LLz LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 2 LL LL LL LL I.2_ ISi ISi u2. n ISi ISi Ia2. LL ISi IZi LL LL I.2_ LL ISi ISi ISi LL LL LL LL LL ISi I.2_ ISi LL LL LL LL I.2_ LL I.2_ LL ISi ISi LL LL LL I.2_ LL LL ISi LL LL LL LL LL ISc, ISi LL M. ?1 11l1 $l1 t^iI (Y7 11 `G N (J . ^-' M Fes- ,*N T 2 oC m� m)) H m U 1❑ p K d❑ d LL N uN] P oM J X 2 2 n R S V Y 2 A. J N N J Y n n X 3 `� 6 K N N twit u�i l LL E 7 2 X c.N., m* VI (" .`� Q� �b �b �b �b ae' 3 a� gg g (�� g g (�Y �C'� 4K 7>>>>> > 2l�utM2Nul NJ ( ogxrr JN Xm Q 44Q..pp, ..pp, m rn C r r rM 22 oJo (?2: 7 rnZ N �O �O �O ^ O O �O � �D �D �O �O b � � �D �G �O �D �O �O O O �O W W 00 �O m �O W W O �D W W m W P P P P P �O P � � P P � � � gO� � � a0 I� 00 � � � h n `^, f', I , ^ �^• n F P ,P PPP `n`S M `P P PP, ni m P P P P M , P P I\ P P; P P,. P, m ",. ni rn P ,P P M P " Kim M � r ' , " M n"P, M en M i:i m m e.Mi n donth End Po rC,! ^ D g •O �D N �Mr1 N pK�� pp�� pq. pp�. . . pyp. . P . . P 1� !� S J1 W � 00 I, m 1. � OD � M OD 0D GO c0 C1 OD m c0 00 00 A . r N N IN O O m# O N O N N Cps A� pm ONp� pCp� N .p ^ P q; N,R oq f4 O4 N m ,O 00 IN., . n IN., 00 N OD t� P P a0 CI 00 00 ET' A �O OD �- fV r C' Q Fi C $88$ggg88888gggg-gs$$888$$8888$ WIrl MOgrOMW� M?-tMg4§ 8$$$8$888888888888$g$888$$$1$8 a Pkag°aaagligkk��o���§I VA g gk§k5gsgog4§Akkkg,g§ M gg gk M ' s P O S'.',? O s. S s s 8 %% CO O S O O8$ “ $$$$$$ 8�8�88888888���&�888�8���88�� 8$888$$8$8$888$$$$88888888$8$$ §WOMOMW-A§§MMV3A§kk§ g $io4WOggI gagggiWiliMM N�^ N N N O N e nQ ^ A^^ P Q P Q N 8$8888888,888888$888888$8888888 iP��m0a5a53 � g §6, AiPP N8.s53N Ne� F! tLVV \ N eV � .Qc�+ Q Q lV en C� -1 F S RO � S S s s SS S S O O O O O S O O O S O 0 0 Vd0 Nr O m 2 2 2 A %Ottt 2 o n n r mi• Z �i y` ;, Z-2 3 zzzz,f, z o m-N . N T. TN NTT TM - M.efMNN-,,Yi ....... P m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m x m m m _m m m m m mm xxxx�xxxxxxxxxxxxxxz=xxxxxxz,LLLL._LL4444LLLLY-x4LL{,LLLLLLLLLLLLLL • ^ e m-pp��m m�Y ea 22 Za X j 3,Tz En^ UU7 "- � 2 �s Z Z Z N> T NNN N> x m m N W LL Q Z [V 8 a 0 m Z m co m m co co m N N N m uu it� w t it� LL� k 4LL. N 00¢¢¢4�a2�N�YYi V e�inM"4�.mMM c`"n e`nn <c,,;; N N N N N u5© N • r) r fV c0 m W $$$8$$8$$$$$$P,8$$$$8$88$$$8P,8$$8gg$gggg 88888$$$8888$$$$$$$88.888889$8.8888,8$8888$8 88�8aa§.84K§0kikkkk �§ W§g 4§��88eg$kkkkkg 4ssa$� gg04§.§.§.$5A0�g1k8((f ggg iggk r O N N N C N O N `O N O N N N N O N e Q Q 0` ^ N P P A P N CI N N N N Q N o0 W� C; $ N, n n$ C$$$ 8 8 M 0 0$ 0$ 8 8 0 O.O P P$$$ O$$$$ P 888888888888888888888888888.88M"8������ $$$8$$888$$8884!88$$88$8$$SR$'41888$$R$8$888 k§U1§§88ga§ § §M01§§kM1VOORnMg&M gsggiRMaafggMMgMritag?g�.j' §fin§WV� 88888888888888888888888888888988888888888 Raai��8gP,M2PF, Mi2MEMLL RAe5 a8Mg ^ n r r n N n e c N N � N N N N H1 N NN N m m m m I+1..om m m Q [n N m M m M m m N m m N m Q Q Q Q Q N Q Q N. Q m e e e Q. Q N ga�y §�y§RVRREM a§§g§fiVRRppARIRRRRRARRRARaRR a fiISOnNNeN+PeP+NNNNNSNrN.�in�,cnM�n- .p\ 4 ¢ ¢ O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL V V 4 V V U n 0 0 0 U V V V U 4 LL U U P U U V U V�J V U LL LL 4+LL. 4. LL ILL- 44.. v. LL [LLi 4 4+LL. U. ILLc 4 44.. 4. LL LL 4- 4 LL Y. LL 14. 4.. 4. U. 44.. ���xz��'�Y�,3�S�emma¢�oo300000� r`^nec"n <'n n�Mc`�n c��i�ni can winc�'n cn� e�nn`c+{` �i��nM�e"'n cn O . O O M M N a0 06 § rW, N O S O OFI C V Q VN) om0, C_§ 00 V a0 NNNVN Q r r $88888;188888888 P $88.88$ $ kkg40811k k�� OM N N^^ O N N P $888888 8i2k§P& RgRkggg 8 0.80 R $ 6.$ O O S O . O 8888888s88888888 8$$$S$$$$888$$$8 kggggfg45%gggga 88888$$$$$888888 glagggIg2gMgg§ N^^ OO N N O^ N^ N N O O N M&MRWM .. ,$$a U, U.AF,M . N N N N M M CO N CO r .0 N ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ UUUULJUUUUOU i 2 2 2 f 2 f i 7 2 f ¢ ¢ LL ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ H¢. u LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL — ['a}yam r AMN it0.i uLLi N N v0.i N N Pot. donth End Portfolio H • 88,8.888888858 8888P8.88bSS8 88.8esa88&s88 88888888.8858 §§§§w§§,§M� § p O T g N W I Nop{�� `0 0 N W �O W 88 88 88 88 88.88 8 �a�8jj 88 88 88 8$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 O. O O O F,F,MMAM M p N1 M• M M p N M M M R RRRRRRRRRRRR \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ sssso`��\sss adadP889888883 G o. �. x on.„ o ppp (�V.1 ., ,o 2 J J O 8 w� 4 X q 2 PfW,54?R $$N ww_ Qurnufrif ��a¢ 'n55OQ 5 0 Zpi-n _u800 rw'u Gi rn vr^� w w= Z ZZ Z Z¢ O O O O 'a u u u 2 2 �U3,sg [:ag4� Elg$M a38�� 0 M g N g N & SEPEPSg A8888 §§§ g N g N T 8888888888 O O O O O gggg§ QReg8 �a8U '4P7r -; 88P888 ' §§WM gg4§§§ 4'tngSS $ $ $ $ $ 8 888888 88A$88 §V§§§, 0 q N4 N� ppp N N N N 888$88 §&M§, yg�N§N, y§§Jp§ Np N N N N N RRS8SR MFSR en en en en en eP .41 e4 Via—gp§R UpRRRR a a a a C a' C w 0000 J J J V {O ¢¢¢¢o t t t t f a a a a Z ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ V u U U „ w w uw w uuu� a 2 �z$xx¢ o Q UE 6 zzzz z QQQQ o zzzz z 2288 S zzzz z O O O Q O a P ; p 3 x� a1' Q N N; N Z N u c c c v§ c Full Compliance iitTreasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in FULL MPLIANCE with the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Poli- cy. The County's Investment Policy is more restrictive than the California Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. MUNICIPAL BONDS (MUNI) U.S. TREASURIES LOCAL AGENCY ;OBLIGATIONS (LAO) ;FEDERAL AGENCIES COMMERCIAL PAPER (CP) TIFICATE & TIME DEPOSITS (NCD & TCD) REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (REPO) . REVERSE REPOS GOVERNMENT CODE 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA j. 5 YEARS NO LIMIT mNA f 5 YEARS NO LIMIT w TMNA COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY 3 YEARS 15% 5 YEARS 100% 3 YEARS..: 5 YEARS NO LIMIT AAA J 5 YEARS 270 DAYS 40% 5 YEARS 30% NA 92 DAYS 2090 NA MEDIUM TERM NOTES 5 YEARS 30% (MTNO) CALTRUST SHORT TERM FUND MONEY MARKET MUTUAL , 60 DAYS 0) 20% AAA/Aaa FUNDS (MMF) €2 1 LOCAL AGENCY NA INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CASH/DEPOSIT ACCOUNT NA NA NA NA 270 DAYS 1 YEAR 25% Combined AA-/Aa3/AA- ; NA 2.5% I'NVESTMENT GRADE 1.24% 100% NA 67.88°A) I 40% A1/P.1/F1 4.58% i . Al / Pl / F1 3.9062n 45 DAYS : 40% max, 25% interm A1/P1/F1` repo over 7 days 60 DAYS 10% NA 3 YEARS 20% AA/Aa2/AA"" DAILY —., LIQUIDITY DAILY 'LIQUIDITY 1.0% 20% NA AAA by2Of3 RATINGS AGC. DAILY Max $50 million NA LIQUIDITY NA_. Mutual Funds maturity may be interpreted as weighted average maturity not exceeding 60 days. 2 Or must have an investment advisor with not less than 5 years experience and with assets under management of $500,000,000. 0.00% 0.00%a 1.05% 2.63%. THIS COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53646 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR 125 14 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Sales Tax Analysis STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4 (Q4) 2012. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its December 2007 meeting, the Commission awarded an agreement to MuniServices, LLC (MuniServices) for quarterly sales tax reporting services plus additional fees contingent on additional sales tax revenue generated from the transactions and use tax (sales tax) audit services. The services performed under this agreement pertain to only the Measure A sales tax revenues. Since the commencement of these services, MuniServices submitted an audit update, which reported findings generated and submitted to the State Board of Equalization (SBOE) for review and determination of errors in sales tax reporting related to 262 businesses. Through Q4 2012 for October through December 2012 (Q4 2012), the SBOE approved corrections for 179 of these accounts for a total sales tax revenue recovery of $2,880,771. If the SBOE concurs with the error(s) for the remaining claims, the Commission will receive additional revenues; however, the magnitude of the value of the remaining findings was not available. It is important to note that while the recoveries of additional revenues will be tangible, it will not be sufficient to alter the overall trend of sales tax revenues. Additionally, MuniServices provided the Commission with the quarterly sales tax summary report for the fourth quarter of calendar year 2012 for Q4 2012. Most of the. Q4 2012 Measure A sales tax revenues were received by the Commission in the first quarter of calendar 2013, during January through March 2013, due to a lag in the sales tax calendar. The summary section of the Q4 2012 report is attached and includes an overview of California sales tax receipts, local results, historical cash collections analysis, summary of the top 25 sales tax contributors, Agenda Item 9E 126 historical sales tax amounts, sales tax by business category, economic trends for significant business category (general retail), and results. The following observations were noted in the Q4 2012 report: • Sales tax receipts for Riverside County were 6.5 percent higher compared to the Q4 2011. While this supports the previous quarterly reports' analyses that an economic recovery statewide and locally is occurring, it does appear the pace may be slowing. Accordingly, the Commission should continue to be cautious as the service stations segment is one of the top three economic segments throughout the state leading this recovery. A significant portion of this growth in this segment is attributable to the high fuel prices. • Taxable transactions for the top 25 tax contributors in Riverside County, which generated 24 percent of the taxable sales for the year -ended Q4 2012, were comparable to the year ended Q4 2011. The top 100 tax contributors generated 38 percent of the taxable sales for the year ended Q4 2012, slightly higher than the 37 percent for the year ended Q3 2011. • Five of the six economic categories experienced increases in the Q4 2012 benchmark year comparison to Q4 2011. Business to business and construction had the largest increases at 16.0 and 15.7 percent, respectively. The business to business category increase was attributable to the electronic equipment, light industry, and leasing segments; the construction increase was related to the building materials retail and wholesale economic segments. Some of these increases may be a result of user taxes from energy companies. The other top three economic categories had increases ranging from 5.5 percent to 9.4 percent. General Retail 28.8 / 5.5 28.9 / 4 ECONOMIC CATEGORY ANALYSIS 28.1 / 4.4 29.4/3.2 30.8/4.1 29.2 / 3.7 27.2 / 5.6 28.8 / 2.2 32.3 / 3.7. Food Products 16.2 / 8.2 19.2 / 6.7 19.9 / 7.4 16.7 / 3.8 16.1 / 4.1 19.9 / 6.7 16.7 / 8.9 18 / 3.9 31.7 / 7 Transportation 26.9 / 9.4 24.8 / 9.7 21.8 / 11.7 28.4 / 11.7 27.1 / 11.4 24.9 / 8.3 28.2 / 10.3 31.6 / 10.8 21 / 2.2 Construction 11.1 / 15.7 8.6 / 6.9 8.4 / 6.7 9.9 / 1.2 10.7 / 7.9 7.8 / 5.3 10.9 / 19.9 11.8 / 4.1 8.5 /0.5 Business to Business Miscellaneous 15.0 / 16.0 1.9 / -0.8 17.3 / 5.4 1.2 / 0 20.6 / 5.6 1.2 / 6.8 14:1 / 4.3 1.6 / 7 14.1 / 9.3 1.2 / -4.7 17.2 / 4.4 1.1 / -1.7 15.2 / 9.3 1.8 / -5.7 8.9 / -0.5 0.9 / -14.2 5.5 / 5.1 1.1 / -1.8 Total 100.0 / 9.4 100 / 6.3 100/7 100 / 5.6 100/7 100 / 5.6 100 / 9.2 100 / 4.9 100 / 4.1 General Retail: Apparel Stores, Department Stores, Furniture/Appliances, Drug Stores, Recreation Products, Florist/Nursery, and Misc. Retail Food Products: Restaurants, Food Markets, Liquor Stores, and Food Processing Equipment Construction: Building Materials Retail and Building Materials Wholesale Transportation: Auto Parts/Repair, Auto Sales - New, Auto Sales - Used, Service Stations, and Misc. Vehicle Sales Business to Business: Office Equip., Electronic Equip., Business Services, Energy Sales, Chemical Products, Heavy Industry, Light Industry, and Leasing Miscellaneous: Health & Government, Miscellaneous Other, and Closed Account Adjustments • Agenda Item 9E 127 " A l l t o p t e n s e g m e n t s ( s e r v i c e s t a t i o n s , d e p a r t m e n t s t o r e s , a u t o s a l e s - n e w , r e s t a u r a n t s , b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s - w h o l e s a l e , m i s c e l l a n e o u s r e t a i l , a p p a r e l s t o r e s , f o o d m a r k e t s , l i g h t i n d u s t r y , a n d b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l - r e t a i l ) s a l e s t a x e s r e a c h e d a n e w h i g h p o i n t d u r i n g Q 4 2 0 1 2 . T h e s e t e n s e g m e n t s r e p r e s e n t 7 7 p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l s a l e s t a x r e c e i p t s . " S e r v i c e s t a t i o n s , d e p a r t m e n t s t o r e s , a n d a u t o s a l e s - n e w r e p r e s e n t t h e t h r e e l a r g e s t e c o n o m i c s e g m e n t s f o r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , o r 3 3 p e r c e n t o f t o t a l s a l e s t a x e s . T h i s i s t h e f i r s t t i m e s i n c e Q 3 2 0 0 8 t h a t a u t o s a l e s - n e w h a s b e e n i n t h e t o p t h r e e e c o n o m i c s e g m e n t s , a s t h e r e s t a u r a n t s s e g m e n t h a s h e l d t h a t p o s i t i o n s i n c e t h e r e c e s s i o n . L a r g e s t S e g m e n t S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s R e s t a u r a n t s E C O N O M I C S E G M E N T A N A L Y S I S R e s t a u r a n t s D e p a r t m e n t S t o r e s D e p a r t m e n t S t o r e s R e s t a u r a n t s S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s R e s t a u r a n t s % o f T o t a l / % C h a n g e 1 1 . 9 / 1 . 4 1 3 . 3 / 6 . 3 1 3 . 9 / 7 . 3 1 2 . 2 / 3 . 0 1 4 . 4 / 3 . 6 1 4 . 1 / 6 . 2 1 0 . 7 / 3 . 8 1 4 . 1 / 4 . 6 2 0 . 6 / 6 . 0 2 n d L a r g e s t S e g m e n t D e p a r t m e n t S t o r e s D e p a r t m e n t S t o r e s A u t o S a l e s - N e w A u t o S a l e s - N e w S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s R e s t a u r a n t s D e p a r t m e n t S t o r e s S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s % o f T o t a l / % C h a n g e 1 1 . 2 / 4 . 2 1 0 . 5 / 3 . 6 9 . 4 / 1 9 1 1 . 1 / 2 2 . 9 1 2 . 2 / 4 . 0 1 0 . 5 / 2 . 2 l a l / 3 . 8 1 3 . 6 / 0 . 1 9 . 9 / 5 . 3 3 r d l a r g e s t S e g m e n t A u t o S a l e s - N e w S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s S e r v i c e S t a t i o n s R e s t a u r a n t s D e p a r t m e n t S t o r e s A u t o S a l e s - N e w R e s t a u r a n t s M i s c . R e t a i l % o f T o t a l / % C h a n g e 1 0 . 0 / 2 1 . 6 1 0 . 3 / 3 . 2 9 . 1 / 4 . 8 1 0 . 8 / 4 . 9 9 . 6 / 5 . 4 1 0 . 2 / 3 . 6 9 . 2 / 1 5 . 2 9 . 5 / 4 . 2 9 . 9 / - . 1 D u r i n g t h e r e v i e w o f t h e Q 4 2 0 1 2 d e t a i l e d r e p o r t w i t h M u n i S e r v i c e s , i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g s a l e s t a x c o m p a r i s o n s b y c i t y a n d c h a n g e b y e c o n o m i c c a t e g o r y f r o m Q 4 2 0 1 1 t o Q 4 2 0 1 2 w a s p r o v i d e d . N e w l y i n c o r p o r a t e d c i t i e s s u c h a s J u r u p a V a l l e y w i l l b e l i s t e d w h e n s u f f i c i e n t c o m p a r a t i v e i n f o r m a t i o n i s a v a i l a b l e . S t a f f c o n t i n u e s t o m o n i t o r m o n t h l y s a l e s t a x r e c e i p t s a n d o t h e r a v a i l a b l e e c o n o m i c d a t a t o d e t e r m i n e t h e n e e d f o r a n y a d j u s t m e n t t o t h e r e v e n u e p r o j e c t i o n s . S t a f f w i l l u t i l i z e t h e f o r e c a s t s c e n a r i o s i n c l u d e d w i t h t h e c o m p l e t e r e p o r t a n d r e c e n t t r e n d s i n a s s e s s i n g s u c h p r o j e c t i o n s . A t t a c h m e n t s : 1 ) S a l e s T a x A n a l y s i s Q 4 2 0 1 2 2 ) S a l e s T a x C o m p a r i s o n b y C i t y f o r Q 4 2 0 1 1 t o Q 4 2 0 1 2 A g e n d a I t e m 9 E 1 2 8 " R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n S a l e s T a x D i g e s t S u m m a r y C o l l e c t i o n s t h r o u g h M a r c h 2 0 1 3 S a l e s t h r o u g h D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2 ( 2 0 1 2 Q 4 ) C A L I F O R N I A ' S E C O N O M I C O U T L O O K C a l i f o r n i a s a l e s t a x r e c e i p t s i n c r e a s e d b y 3 . 5 % o v e r t h e s a m e q u a r t e r f r o m t h e p r e v i o u s y e a r , w i t h N o r t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a r e p o r t i n g a 3 . 9 % i n c r e a s e c o m p a r e d t o 3 . 1 % f o r S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . R e c e i p t s f o r t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n c h a n g e d b y 6 . 5 % o v e r t h e s a m e p e r i o d s . A s t a t e w i d e l o o k a t e c o n o m i c p e r f o r m a n c e s t i l l i n d i c a t e s u p w a r d m o v e m e n t , b u t t h e p a c e s e e m s t o b e s l o w i n g . T h e b o o m i n t h e s a l e o f n e w v e h i c l e s c o n t i n u e s , w i t h s a l e s u p 2 5 % i n 2 0 1 2 o v e r t h e p r i o r y e a r , b u t a m o r e m o d e s t 8 % t o 1 0 % g r o w t h i s p r o j e c t e d f o r 2 0 1 3 . G a s o l i n e p r i c e s a r e s t i l l p r e d i c t e d t o r i s e t h r o u g h t h e s u m m e r , b u t t o b e l o w e r b y t h e e n d o f 2 0 1 3 t h a n t h e y w e r e , a t t h e e n d o f 2 0 1 2 . T h e r e s i d e n t i a l r e a l e s t a t e m a r k e t c o n t i n u e s t o s h o w s o m e p r o g r e s s . T h e n u m b e r o f s i n g l e f a m i l y h o m e s s o l d w a s d o w n 3 . 9 % f r o m l a s t y e a r . T h e m e d i a n p r i c e w a s u p 2 4 . 1 % , b u t d o w n 8 . 1 % f r o m t h e p r i o r m o n t h . T h e U n e m p l o y m e n t R a t e f o r J a n u a r y w a s 1 0 . 4 % , d o w n 0 . 9 % f r o m t h e p r e v i o u s y e a r . T h e b e s t j o b g r o w t h c o n t i n u e s t o b e i n C o m p u t e r r e l a t e d i n d u s t r i e s a n d S c i e n t i f i c R e s e a r c h a n d D e v e l o p m e n t . R e t a i l a n d F o o d S e r v i c e s S a l e s a r e u p 4 . 6 % n a t i o n a l l y c o m p a r e d t o F e b r u a r y o f l a s t y e a r . L O C A L R E S U L T S N e t C a s h R e c e i p t s A n a l y s i s L o c a l C o l l e c t i o n s S h a r e o f C o u n t y P o o l 0 . 0 % S h a r e o f S t a t e P o o l 0 . 0 % S B E N e t C o l l e c t i o n s L e s s : A m o u n t D u e C o u n t y 0 . 0 % L e s s : C o s t o f A d m i n i s t r a t i o n N e t 4 0 2 0 1 2 R e c e i p t s N e t 4 Q 2 0 1 1 R e c e i p t s A c t u a l P e r c e n t a g e C h a n g e B u s i n e s s A c t i v i t y P e r f o r m a n c e A n a l y s i s L o c a l C o l l e c t i o n s L e s s : P a y m e n t s f o r P r i o r P e r i o d s P r e l i m i n a r y 4 Q 2 0 1 2 C o l l e c t i o n s P r o j e c t e d 4 Q 2 0 1 2 L a t e P a y m e n t s P r o j e c t e d 4 Q 2 0 1 2 F i n a l R e s u l t s A c t u a l 4 Q 2 0 1 1 R e s u l t s P r o j e c t e d P e r c e n t a g e C h a n g e $ 3 8 , 0 2 6 , 6 7 4 0 0 3 8 , 0 2 6 , 6 7 4 . 0 0 ( 3 3 8 , 2 1 0 ) 3 7 , 6 8 8 , 4 6 4 3 5 , 3 9 8 , 4 6 2 6 . 5 % $ 3 8 , 0 2 6 , 6 7 4 ( 8 1 3 , 8 5 4 ) 3 7 , 2 1 2 , 8 2 0 1 , 3 6 9 , 2 4 0 3 8 , 5 8 2 , 0 6 0 3 5 , 7 9 7 , 6 2 7 7 . 8 % w w w . M u n i S e r v i c e s . c o m ( 8 1 3 0 8 0 0 - 8 1 8 1 P a g e 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission HISTORICAL CASH COLLECTIONS ANALYSIS BY QUARTER $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 c $25,000 u d $20,000 - C Z $15,000 $10,000 - $5,000 - $0 (in thousands of $) $400 $350 - $300 $250 ;> a> fs. $200 0 E $150 d $100 - $50 $0 3Q2010 4Q2010 1Q2011 2Q2011 3Q2011 4Q2011 1Q2012 2Q2012 3Q2012 4Q2012 ® Net Receipts -—SBOE Admin Fees Due TOP 25 SALES/USE TAX CONTRIBUTORS The following list identifies RCTC's Top 25 Sales/Use lax contributors. The list is in alphabetical order and represents sales from January 2012 to December 2012. The Top 25 Sales/Use Tax contributors generate 24.1% of RCTC's total sales and use tax revenue. BEST BUY STORES CARMAX THE AUTO SUPERSTORE CHEVRON SERVICE STATIONS CIRCLE K FOOD STORES COSTCO WHOLESALE DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES DESERT SUNLIGHT EDISON MATERIAL SUPPLY GE PACKAGED POWER GENESIS SOLAR HOME DEPOT K MART STORES KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORE RALPH'S GROCERY COMPANY RITE AID DRUG STORES ROSS STORES SAM'S CLUB SHELL SERVICE STATIONS STATER BROS MARKETS TARGET STORES VONS SERVICE STATIONS WAL MART STORES WALGREEN'S DRUG STORES www.MuniSer-vices.corn (800) 800-8181 Page 2 130 Riverside County Transportation Commission HISTORICAL SALES TAX AMOUNTS The following chart shows the sales tax level from sales through December 2012, the highs, and the lows for each segment over the last two years. (in thousands of $) $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 .4Q2o12 ' •High a Low ¢5�,ar e<`•SaP `Q5 s'`.". • . JS¢a a.. ▪ »�• � oa▪ S� Q ` �� �� %� �� > »�6Qac ooa r• D` 4, �¢Q�< F'��0 `ate c -' Q.4 4 �p� ` 15 4's ANNUAL SALES TAX BY BUSINESS CATEGORY 4Q2o12 3Q2012 2Q2012 1Q2012 4Q2011 3Q201 1 2Q2011 1Q2011 4Q2010 3Q2010 $O (in thousands of $) 4 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 1-871 General Retail 1® Food Products El Transportation 1111 Construction el Business To Business i® Miscellaneous www.MuniServices.com (800) 800-8181 Page 3 131 Riverside County Transportation Commission FIVE-YEAR ECONOMIC TREND: General Retail $14,000 $12,000 - $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $O (in thousands °T$) d d d FINAL RESULTS: July -September 2012 Sales Local Net Cash Collections Less: Pool Amounts Less: Prior Quarter Payments Add: Late Payments Local Net Economic Collections after Adjustments Percent Change from July -September 2011 Sales MUNISERVICES' ON -GOING AUDIT RESULTS This Quarter Total to Date $192,739 $2,668,143 0 0 N N N O O O O O O O O O -O O eV eVN IV IV N N N eV N IV N N- fV I o a o a a a CY o a s o $36,406,568 ($-347,710) ($2,193,236) $279,306 $34,840,348 UP BY 12.8% www.MuniSenrvices.com (800) 800-8181 Page 4 132 soutnern Latitorma: sales lax uomparison from UCt-Uec LU11 sales to UCt-Uec LU1L sales Jurisdiction TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY General Retail Flood' Products Tuns. " Const .. i;usines to ? ;, Misa. Business Oct - Dec 2P Total '�, . Dec 20 1 Total •%Crtg : Largest. 6ain ;;ti,' `�2ndLargestGain GargeDeclin 1 rgesLDecline •. RCTC 5.1% 46% 9.0% 7.5% 16,9% 0.1% 38 581,653 35,797 335 , • 7.8% Auto Sales New Electronic Equipment Furniture/Appliance Drug Stores RIVERSIDE COUNTY Banning -5.3% 1.4% -7,5% 86.1% 19.8% -3.4% 419,583 423,629 -1.0% BIdg.Matls•Whsle Furniture/Appliance Auto Sales - New Miscellaneous Retail Beaumont 4.0% 5.9% 20.0% 4.8% 20.5% 6.2% 926,168 837,600 10.6% Service Stations Light Industry Energy Sales Auto Sales - New Blythe 0.6% 8.6% 6.8% 55.3% 27.6% -29.2% 447,262 392,942 13.8% BIdg.Matls-Whsle Light Industry Leasing Auto Parts/Repair Calimesa - -2.9% 2.6% 6.4% -59.6% 14.4% 16.0% 153,461 147,259 4.2% Service Stations Miscellaneous Retail Apparel Stores Recreation Products Canyon Lake 120.7°% 16.8% 15.4% 23.5% -2.2% 35.2% 41,549 30,497 36.2% Department Stores Liquor Stores Furniture/Appliance Business Services Cathedral City -3.9% 1.2% 7.0% 63.0% 33.3% -38.6% 1,691,700 1,580,240 7.1% Auto Sales - New BIdg.Matls-Whsle Service Stations Light Industry Coachella 9.0% 4.0% 4,3% 14.2% 10.1% -14.2% 764,266 723,778 5.6% SERVICE STATIONS BLDG.MATLS-WHSLE AUTO SALES • USED BLDG.MATLS-RETAIL Corona 3.0% 8.6% 2.4% 14.0% 3.6% -6.1% 7,373,303 6,952,264 6.1%BIdg.Matls-Whsle Department Stores Office Equipment Auto Sales - Used Desert Hot Springs -4.0% 3.1% 11.2% 14.4% 123.8% -14.3% 329,996 307,837 7.2% Service Stations Heavy Industry Department Stores Auto Parts/Repair Eastvale -6.3% 14.2% 34.6% 84,7% 71.3% 11.5% 1,381,804 1,172,797 17.8% Electronic Equipment BIdg.Matls-Whsle Miscellaneous Retail Light Industry Hemet -0.9% -0.6% 12.1% 4.8% 0.7% 24.7% 2,158,573 2,063,224 4.6% Auto Sales - New Auto Parts/Repair Department Stores Light Industry Indian Wells 6.5% 5.5% 21.8% -5.0% 146.8% -69.9% 210,736 196,861 7,0% Restaurants Light Industry Miscellaneous Retail Furniture/Appliance Indio 6.6% 12.2% 16.0% 16.3% 6.5% -9.2% 1,887,833 1,686,960 11.9% Auto Sales • New Food Markets Heavy Industry Misc. Vehicle Sales La Quinta 4.0% 5.6% 4.7% -20.2% 2.9% -16,4% 1,939,844 1,905,170 1.8% Department Stores Auto Parts/Repair BIdg.Matls-Retail Service Stations Lake Elsinore 5.6% 11.6% -1.3% -5.0% -29.2% -7.1% 1,750,909 1,714,299 2.1% DEPARTMENT STORES FOOD MARKETS HEAVY INDUSTRY SERVICE STATIONS Menifee 5.8% 13.1% 3.9% -0.8% 4.5% -51.3% 1,201,577 1,134,230 5.9% Restaurants Furniture/Appliance Miscellaneous Other Energy Sales Moreno Valley 3.8% 3.8% 9.5% 2.8% -1.3.3% -30.1% 3,341,677 3,216,180 3.9% Auto Sales - New Apparel Stores Office Equipment Service Stations MUfrieta 3.6% 5.6% 10.9% -11.7% 2.3% -3.5% 2,747,739 2,644,445 3.9% Service Stations Misc. Vehicle Sales BIdg.Matls-Whsle BIdg.Matls-Retail Norco 0.0% 3.6% 18.6% 34.5% 8.8% 79.9% 1,115,752 997,969 11.8% Auto Sales - New Auto Parts/Repair Food Markets Recreation Products Palm Desert 1.8% 7.5% -5.8% 6.7% 25.4% -4.5% 4,210,941 4,066,573 3.6% CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOOD MARKETS SERVICE STATIONS FURNITURE/APPLIANCE Palm Springs 5.0% 2.9% 11.5% -7.8% 1.0% -11.9% 2,486,589 2,409,296 3.2% Service Stations Miscellaneous Retail Health& Government BIdg.Matls-Retail Perris -1.5% 9.8% 6.0% 14.2% 46.6% 17.8% 1,589,158 1,406,208 13.0% Electronic Equipment Miscellaneous Other Heavy Industry Miscellaneous Retail Rancho Mirage -11.6% 2.0% -7.9% -2.8% 0.3% 0.8% 977,328 1,021,426 -4.3% Apparel Stores Restaurants Miscellaneous Retail Misc. Vehicle Sales Riverside 1.7% 1.9% 9.9% 15.1% 13.6% -11.5% 11,239,483 10,506,874 7.0% Auto Sales • New Bldg. Matls-Whsle Health & Government Miscellaneous Retail Riverside County 9.9% -1.5% 5.8% 327.4% 167.1% -38.4% 8,050,907 5,208,322 54.6% Bldg .Matls-Whsle Electronic Equipment Food Markets Furniture/Appliance San Jacinto 1.0% 3.1% 4.8% 7.1% 43.9% 3.5% 512,568 511,352 0.2% Service Stations Department Stores Heavy Industry Auto Parts/Repair Temecula 5.9% 9.7% 12.9% •11.6% 14,9% 5.9% 6,758,601 6,443,384 4.9%Auto Sales New Miscellaneous Retail Light Industry BIdg.Matls-Retail Wildomar 39.5% -3.5% -9.3% -24.3% -13. 1% 7.8% 285,151 295,867 -3.6% MISCELLANEOUS RETAIL FLORIST/NURSERY SERVICE STATIONS RESTAURANTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Ontario 3.9% 5.1% 10.2% 9.0% 12.0% -6.8% 14,984,665 13,876,971 8.0% LIGHT INDUSTRY AUTO SALES • NEW HEALTH & GOVERNMENT FURNITURE/APPLIANCE 133 nni,niC.n,;nee I I r^ " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : M a r l a D y e , P r o c u r e m e n t A d m i n i s t r a t o r M a t t W a l l a c e , P r o c u r e m e n t M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : R e c u r r i n g C o n t r a c t s f o r F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s f o r F Y 2 0 . 1 3 / 1 4 ; a n d 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r o r E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t s o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : C o n s i s t e n t w i t h p r e v i o u s y e a r s a n d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e P r o c u r e m e n t P o l i c y M a n u a l , a s r e v i s e d a n d a d o p t e d i n D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n n u a l l y e v a l u a t e s e x i s t i n g c o n t r a c t s f o r p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s d u e t o e x p i r e w i t h i n t h e n e x t f i s c a l y e a r . T h e s e c o n t r a c t s m a y b e p l a c e d o n t h e c a l e n d a r f o r a n e w p r o c u r e m e n t s o l i c i t a t i o n , a l l o w e d t o e x p i r e b e c a u s e t h e y a r e n o l o n g e r r e q u i r e d , o r i n c l u d e d i n t h e a n n u a l r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s l i s t s u b j e c t t o C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l . M o s t c o n t r a c t s f o r p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s a r e s u b j e c t t o a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c e s s . T h i s y e a r ' s l i s t o f r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s i n c l u d e s c o n s u l t a n t s p r o v i d i n g u n i q u e o r s p e c i a l i z e d s e r v i c e s a n d w o r k s c l o s e l y w i t h s t a f f o n l o n g - t e r m p r o j e c t s . S t a f f d e s i r e s t o r e t a i n a l i m i t e d n u m b e r o f c o n s u l t a n t s o n t h e r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s l i s t b e c a u s e o f t h e i r h i s t o r i c a l k n o w l e d g e , u n i q u e e x p e r i e n c e , a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d s p e c i f i c C o m m i s s i o n p r o j e c t s . U n d e r l i m i t e d c i r c u m s t a n c e s , s t a f f b e l i e v e s i t i s m o r e e f f i c i e n t a n d c o s t e f f e c t i v e t o r e t a i n t h e c o n s u l t a n t s o n t h e r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s l i s t r a t h e r t h a n r e b i d d i n g t h e s e r v i c e s a t t h i s p a r t i c u l a r t i m e . A p p r o v a l o f t h e r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s l i s t w i l l a l l o w t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o c o n t i n u e w o r k o n e x i s t i n g p r o j e c t s w i t h o u t i n t e r r u p t i o n s a n d m a i n t a i n c o n s i s t e n c y . T h e l i s t o f p r o p o s e d r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 , f o l l o w e d b y a s u m m a r y f o r e a c h c o n s u l t a n t s u p p o r t i n g i t s i n c l u s i o n o n t h e r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s l i s t i s a s f o l l o w s : A g e n d a I t e m 9 F . 1 3 4 Schedule of Recurring Contracts for FY 2013/14 Consultant Name Description of Services Budget FY 12/13 Budget FY 13/14 Dollar Change FY 13 to FY 14 AMMA Transit Planning (AMMA) Administration support for Specialized Transit Program $100,000 $100,000 $O Bartel Associates, LLC (Bartel) Actuarial services 12,000 13,000 1,000 Bechtel Infrastructure (Bechtel) Capital project program management services 7,442,800 8,200,900 758,100 Best, Best & Krieger LLP (BB&K) General legal services *2,258,100 3,380,100 1,122,000 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. (Epic) Property management support services for Commission -owned properties and related contracts 684,000 637,500 (46,500) Fieldman Rolapp & Associates (Fieldman) Financial advisory services 650,000 400,000 (250,000) Norton Rose Fulbright (Fulbright) Disclosure counsel services 165,000 125,000 (40,000) Geographies Graphic design and web services for Multimodal Services Department 1,229,500 1,442,000 212,500 InfoTech Services, Inc. (InfoTech) Database programming and IT management _ 10,000 20,000 10,000 McGladrey Audit services 144,200 200,000 55,800 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (Orrick) Bond Counsel Services 550,000 350,000 (200,000) Ray Gorski Air quality technical services 25,000 45,000 20,000 Trapeze Regional rideshare software 45,000 45,000 0 Total $13,315,600 $14,958,500 $1,642,900 *Amount Excludes $960,000 that is the subject of a separate agenda item. Consultant Name Description of Services Budget FY 12/13 Budget FY 13/14 5-Year Contract Beacon Economics (Beacon) Sales tax forecasting services $8,000 $9,500 $47,500 MuniServices LLC Sales tax audit, analysis, and reporting services 20,000 24,000 120,000 Total $28,000 $33,500 $167,500 Agenda Item 9F 135 " " " A M M A I n F e b r u a r y 2 0 0 7 , A M M A w a s s e l e c t e d u n d e r a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c u r e m e n t p r o c e s s t o p r o v i d e c o n s u l t i n g s e r v i c e s f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e C o o r d i n a t e d P u b l i c T r a n s i t - H u m a n S e r v i c e s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n ( C o o r d i n a t e d P l a n ) , a s w e l l a s t h e r e q u i r e d u p d a t e s o f t h e C o o r d i n a t e d P l a n i n c l u d i n g m o n i t o r i n g o f f e d e r a l J o b s A c c e s s R e v e r s e C o m m u t e a n d N e w F r e e d o m g r a n t a w a r d s . A M M A a l s o g u i d e s s t a f f r e g a r d i n g t h e g r a n t a p p l i c a t i o n p r o c e s s f o r t h e F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 E l d e r l y a n d D i s a b l e d S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t p r o g r a m . A d d i t i o n a l l y , A M M A a d v i s e s s t a f f r e g a r d i n g t h e m a n a g e m e n t o f o p e r a t o r r e p o r t i n g f o r t h e 2 0 1 3 S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t U n i v e r s a l C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s a n d a s s i s t s i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e a p p l i c a t i o n a n d e l i g i b i l i t y g u i d e l i n e s f o r f u t u r e S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t U n i v e r s a l C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s . B a r t e l B a r t e l w a s s e l e c t e d a s t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a c t u a r y i n M a r c h 2 0 0 7 , f o l l o w i n g a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c u r e m e n t p r o c e s s . B a r t e l p r o v i d e s a c t u a r i a l v a l u a t i o n s e r v i c e s f o r p o s t e m p l o y m e n t m e d i c a l b e n e f i t s u n d e r G o v e r n m e n t a l A c c o u n t i n g S t a n d a r d s B o a r d ( G A S B ) S t a t e m e n t N o . 4 5 a n d G A S B S t a t e m e n t N o . 5 7 . C a I P E R S r e q u i r e s v a l u a t i o n s o f s u c h o t h e r p o s t e m p l o y m e n t b e n e f i t s ( O P E B ) t o b e p r e p a r e d e v e r y t w o y e a r s . B a r t e l p r e p a r e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s F a s t O P E B a c t u a r i a l v a l u a t i o n a s o f J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 1 f o r F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 a n d F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 . A n O P E B a c t u a r i a l v a l u a t i o n a s o f J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 3 f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 a n d F Y 2 0 1 4 / 1 5 i s n o w r e q u i r e d . B a s e d o n t h e c u r r e n t r e q u i r e m e n t a n d t h e c h a n g e s r e l a t e d t o t h e C a l i f o r n i a P u b l i c E m p l o y e e P e n s i o n R e f o r m A c t o f 2 0 1 3 , s t a f f d e t e r m i n e d i t w o u l d b e m o r e e f f i c i e n t a n d c o s t e f f e c t i v e t o e x t e n d t h e c o n t r a c t f o r a f i n a l o n e - y e a r p e r i o d t h r o u g h J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 4 . S t a f f i n t e n d s t o c o n d u c t a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c u r e m e n t f o r O P E B a c t u a r i a l v a l u a t i o n s e r v i c e s p r i o r t o t h e n e x t v a l u a t i o n a s o f J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 5 . B e c h t e l T h e B e c h t e l c o n t r a c t f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 r e f l e c t s a 1 0 p e r c e n t i n c r e a s e o v e r l a s t y e a r , d u e t o i n c r e a s e s i n s t a f f i n g , p r i m a r i l y f o r t h e t o l l p r o j e c t s . S e v e r a l o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s p r o j e c t s , i n c l u d i n g t h e S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 C o r r i d o r I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t ( S R - 9 1 C I P ) a n d w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t s o n I n t e r s t a t e 2 1 5 a r e e n t e r i n g t h e m o r e l a b o r - i n t e n s i v e d e s i g n - b u i l d o r c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e s , n e c e s s i t a t i n g a n i n c r e a s e i n s t a f f i n g t o s u p p o r t t h i s w o r k . B e c h t e l i s c o n t i n u i n g p r o g r a m m a n a g e m e n t a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i t i e s o f h i g h w a y a n d r a i l p r o j e c t s f o r t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m , a s w e l l a s t h e w r a p - u p o f d e l i v e r y f o r t h e r e m a i n i n g p r o j e c t s f o r t h e 1 9 8 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m . B e c h t e l p o s s e s s e s t h e k n o w l e d g e a n d b a c k g r o u n d h i s t o r y o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s , w h i c h i s n e c e s s a r y t o d e l i v e r t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s A g e n d a I t e m 9 F 1 3 6 Measure A projects. The flexibility of obtaining additional support from Bechtel as needed for specific project requirements is also important and avoids the need to increase Commission staff. BB&K The BB&K contract for FY 2013/14 reflects a significant increase in legal costs, primarily related to litigation as well as specialized legal services for certain projects. A high level of general legal services is generally required from BB&K for capital project activities, including right of way, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee projects. BB&K also provides support related to procurements and contract development. The increase is primarily attributable to specialized legal services related to right of way and debt financing on highway and commuter rail projects as well as general legal services on highway and rail capital projects. In recent years, the Commission engaged other legal firms for specific matters involving potential conflicts of interest, as well as specialized legal services. Epic Epic was selected through a competitive procurement process for property management services. Due to its accumulated knowledge and development of various property management projects, resources, and databases associated with the multitude of Commission -owned properties, including but not limited ,to those along the San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL), staff determined Epic can most efficiently and cost effectively provide property management services. The scope of services for FY 2013/14 includes upgrading private use and utility licenses to current Commission terms; evaluating fair market value of the uses of Commission owned property; maintaining and updating a database to capture all of the Commission's property and contract information;, maintaining and updating mapping of all Commission properties and contracts; following up on delinquent rent payments; monitoring contractor activities on Commission property to ensure compliance with right of entries; tracking insurance certifications; inspecting rail properties for debris and dumping on a monthly basis; coordinating Commission vendors for removal of debris and illegal occupants; marketing and selling excess land; and resolving complex title issues. The contract is expected to decrease by approximately 7 percent as the analysis of the existing licenses and, encroachments has been completed and some of the issues have abeen resolved The reduction is partially offset by implementation of new property management procedures to address insurance, rent collections, and debris removal. Fieldman • • Fieldman was selected as the Commission's financial advisor in late 2003, • following a procurement process, and provided financial advisory services on Agenda Item 9F 137 " " g e n e r a l f i n a n c e m a t t e r s a n d s p e c i f i c f i n a n c i n g t r a n s a c t i o n s r e l a t e d t o t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m . F i e l d m a n p l a y e d a s i g n i f i c a n t r o l e i n t h e S R - 9 1 C I P f i n a n c i n g a c t i v i t i e s t h a t a r e e x p e c t e d t o a c h i e v e f i n a n c i a l c l o s e i n e a r l y J u l y ; t h e s e a c t i v i t i e s i n c l u d e t h e i s s u a n c e o f s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e a n d t o l l r e v e n u e b o n d s a n d t h e f e d e r a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I n f r a s t r u c t u r e F i n a n c e a n d I n n o v a t i o n A c t ( T I F I A ) l o a n . A f t e r f i n a n c i a l c l o s e , s t a f f w i l l r e q u i r e a d d i t i o n a l s u p p o r t r e l a t e d t o t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f r e p o r t s r e q u i r e d b y t h e T I F I A l o a n a g r e e m e n t , t o l l i n d e n t u r e s , a n d c o n t i n u i n g d i s c l o s u r e a g r e e m e n t s . F u r t h e r m o r e , t h e 2 0 0 9 v a r i a b l e r a t e s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d s a n d t h e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m l i q u i d i t y f a c i l i t i e s w i l l e x p i r e i n S e p t e m b e r a n d O c t o b e r 2 0 1 4 , r e s p e c t i v e l y , a n d w i l l r e q u i r e f i n a n c i a l a d v i s o r y s e r v i c e s r e g a r d i n g e x t e n s i o n , s u b s t i t u t i o n , o r t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e t h e s e l i q u i d i t y f a c i l i t i e s . I f e i t h e r o r b o t h o f t h e f a c i l i t i e s a r e t e r m i n a t e d , a f i n a n c i n g t r a n s a c t i o n m a y b e n e c e s s a r y . B a s e d o n f i n a n c i n g a c t i v i t i e s i n p r o g r e s s a n d a n t i c i p a t e d t h r o u g h F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 , a s w e l l a s F i e l d m a n ' s k n o w l e d g e a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n , s t a f f d e t e r m i n e d i t w o u l d b e m o r e e f f i c i e n t a n d c o s t - e f f e c t i v e f o r c o n t i n u i t y p u r p o s e s t o r e t a i n F i e l d m a n . F u l b r i g h t I n J u l y 2 0 0 9 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a w a r d e d a p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s a g r e e m e n t t o F u l b r i g h t f o r d i s c l o s u r e c o u n s e l s e r v i c e s i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s 2 0 0 9 b o n d i s s u a n c e . T h e a g r e e m e n t h a s b e e n p e r i o d i c a l l y a m e n d e d f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s s u b s e q u e n t d e b t t r a n s a c t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g t h e c u r r e n t f i n a n c i n g f o r t h e S R - 9 1 C I P . S t a f f h a s b e e n s a t i s f i e d w i t h F u l b r i g h t ' s h i g h l e v e l o f s e r v i c e a n d r e c o m m e n d s F u l b r i g h t ' s a g r e e m e n t b e a m e n d e d t o i n c l u d e d i s c l o s u r e c o u n s e l s e r v i c e s r e l a t e d t o a p o s s i b l e i s s u a n c e o r r e f i n a n c i n g o f s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e d e b t i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e e x t e n s i o n , s u b s t i t u t i o n , o r t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e l i q u i d i t y f a c i l i t i e s t h a t s u p p o r t t h e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m a n d t h e 2 0 0 9 v a r i a b l e r a t e s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d s . G e o g r a p h i c s A s t h e r e s u l t o f a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c u r e m e n t p r o c e s s i n D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 6 , G e o g r a p h i c s w a s a w a r d e d a p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s a g r e e m e n t t o s u p p o r t t h e C o m m i s s i o n b y p r o v i d i n g m a r k e t i n g a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n s s e r v i c e s . C h a n g e s i n t e c h n o l o g y h a v e m e a n t w e b - b a s e d c o m m u n i c a t i o n s f o r m a n e v e r - g r e a t e r c o m p o n e n t o f h o w t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e a c h e s t h e p u b l i c w i t h c o m m u t e r a n d p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o g r a m s . G e o g r a p h i c s d e v e l o p e d t h e a r c h i t e c t u r e a n d s o f t w a r e f o r m o s t o f t h e s e n e w m e t h o d s o f o u t r e a c h . T h r e e m i s s i o n c r i t i c a l p r o j e c t s c o n t i n u e t o b e u n d e r d e v e l o p m e n t : T r a n s i t i o n o f m a n y a s p e c t s o f t h e C o m m u t e r A s s i s t a n c e P r o g r a m t o I E 5 1 1 , a n i n t e r a c t i v e , w e b - b a s e d e n v i r o n m e n t ; A g e n d a I t e m 9 F 1 3 8 " T h e i n t e g r a t i o n o f n e w r e g i o n - w i d e s o f t w a r e f o r a v e r a g e v e h i c l e r i d e r s h i p ( A V R ) c a l c u l a t i o n w i t h n e w c o m m u t e r a s s i s t a n c e r i d e m a t c h i n g a n d i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m s o f t w a r e , a l l o w i n g e m p l o y e r s t o m e e t r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e S o u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t ; a n d " I n t e g r a t i o n o f t h e n e w r e g i o n w i d e s o f t w a r e w i t h 1 E 5 1 1 . G e o g r a p h i c s w a s t h e a r c h i t e c t o f t h e 1 E 5 1 1 s y s t e m a n d t h e n e w A V R , r i d e m a t c h i n g , a n d i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m s y s t e m . A d d i t i o n a l f u n d s f o r p r o g r a m m i n g a r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e b u d g e t f o r n e a r t e r m e n h a n c e m e n t s o f t h e K o m o t o r s o f t w a r e . I n a d d i t i o n , G e o g r a p h i c s d e v e l o p e d t h e 1 E 5 1 1 s y s t e m s o f t w a r e b o t h f o r t h e d e s k t o p a n d m o b i l e a p p l i c a t i o n . G e o g r a p h i c s p r o v i d e s s e r v i c e s t o e n s u r e a l l c o m p o n e n t s o f t h e n e w s y s t e m s a r e i n t e r o p e r a b l e a s t h e y a r e d e v e l o p e d a n d a s s i s t s t h e C o m m i s s i o n b y m a n a g i n g t h e t r a n s i t i o n f r o m e n d o f l i f e s y s t e m s t o n e w s y s t e m s i n a c l o u d e n v i r o n m e n t . G e o g r a p h i c s ' s e r v i c e s a r e c r i t i c a l t o t h e s u c c e s s o f t h e n e w 1 E 5 1 1 a n d c o m m u t e r a s s i s t a n c e p r o g r a m ' s d e l i v e r y . B a s e d o n t h e s e r e q u i r e d s e r v i c e s , G e o g r a p h i c s ' c o n t r a c t f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 r e f l e c t s t h e s a m e l e v e l o f e x p e n d i t u r e s a s F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 f o r C o m m u t e r A s s i s t a n c e a n d 1 ` E 5 1 1 . A s t h e C o m m i s s i o n m a n a g e s b o t h t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y C o m m u t e r A s s i s t a n c e 1 E 5 1 1 p r o g r a m s , S a n B e r n a r d i n o A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s w i l l r e i m b u r s e a p p r o x i m a t e l y 5 0 p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l G e o g r a p h i c s c o n t r a c t c o s t f o r t h e s e r v i c e s t h a t b e n e f i t t h e S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y p r o g r a m s . I n f o T e c h T h e C o m m i s s i o n e n t e r e d i n t o a n a g r e e m e n t w i t h W e s t e r n A r e a S e c u r i t y S e r v i c e s ( W A S S ) f o r c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n s e c u r i t y g u a r d s e r v i c e s i n 2 0 0 6 . I n f o T e c h w a s a s u b c o n s u l t a n t t o W A S S a n d d e s i g n e d a n d b u i l t t h e S t a t i o n S e c u r i t y M a i n t e n a n c e D a t a b a s e . I n 2 0 1 1 , t h e W A S S a g r e e m e n t e x p i r e d , a n d s e c u r i t y g u a r d s e r v i c e s w e r e c o m p e t i t i v e l y b i d r e s u l t i n g i n a n a w a r d t o U n i v e r s a l P r o t e c t i o n S e r v i c e s G P , I n c . T h e d a t a b a s e b u i l t b y I n f o T e c h i n t e g r a t e s t h e D e g g y W a n d S y s t e m a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s d a i l y a c t i v i t y / s t a t i o n , m a i n t e n a n c e r e p o r t s . T h i s d a t a b a s e s y s t e m r e q u i r e s p e r i o d i c m a i n t e n a n c e , d a t a b a s e u p g r a d e s , a n d a d d i t i o n a l r e p o r t i n g t o s u s t a i n a n d e n h a n c e f u n c t i o n a l i t y . B a s e d o n t h e s p e c i a l i z e d n a t u r e o f t h e d a t a b a s e a r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n f o T e c h ' s p a r t i c u l a r k n o w l e d g e a n d e x p e r i e n c e a s d e v e l o p e r o f t h e s y s t e m , i t w i l l b e b e n e f i c i a l a n d c o s t e f f e c t i v e t o r e t a i n t h e s e s e r v i c e s . M c G l a d r e y I n M a r c h 2 0 0 8 f o l l o w i n g a p r o c u r e m e n t p r o c e s s , M c G l a d r e y w a s a w a r d e d a p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s a g r e e m e n t t o p e r f o r m t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a n n u a l a u d i t s f o r a f i v e - y e a r p e r i o d t h a t c o n c l u d e d w i t h t h e c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 a u d i t i n N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 2 , I n J u n e 2 0 1 2 , t h e a u d i t c o n t r a c t w i t h M c G l a d r e y w a s e x t e n d e d t h r o u g h t h e r e c u r r i n g c o n t r a c t s p r o c e s s . T h e r e w i l l b e s i g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a c c o u n t i n g a n d r e p o r t i n g a s a r e s u l t o f t h e S R - 9 1 C I P f i n a n c i n g a s " " A g e n d a I t e m 9 F 1 3 9 " " " w e l l a s t o t h e a c c o u n t i n g a c t i v i t i e s r e l a t e d t o t h e t o l l o p e r a t i o n s t h a t w i l l c o m m e n c e i n F Y 2 0 1 6 / 1 7 . T h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s d e b t i n d e n t u r e s a n d a g r e e m e n t s r e q u i r e t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o o b t a i n a r e p o r t a n d o p i n i o n o f a n a t i o n a l l y r e c o g n i z e d p u b l i c a c c o u n t i n g f i r m , s u c h a s M c G l a d r e y . B a s e d o n M c G l a d r e y ' s k n o w l e d g e a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s o p e r a t i o n s , p r o g r a m s , a n d f i n a n c i n g s , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s r e t a i n i n g M c G l a d r e y f o r a n a d d i t i o n a l a u d i t f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 t h r o u g h D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 4 , a s w e l l a s t o p r o v i d e c o n s u l t i n g s e r v i c e s r e g a r d i n g a c c o u n t i n g a n d f i n a n c i a l r e p o r t i n g c h a n g e s t h a t w i l l b e n e c e s s a r y a s a r e s u l t o f t h e S R - 9 1 C I P a n d c o m m e n c e m e n t o f t o l l o p e r a t i o n s . T h e i n c r e a s e i n a u d i t c o s t s i s p r i m a r i l y r e l a t e d t o s u c h c o n s u l t i n g s e r v i c e s . O r r i c k O r r i c k w a s s e l e c t e d a s b o n d c o u n s e l i n l a t e 2 0 0 4 , f o l l o w i n g a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c u r e m e n t p r o c e s s a n d p r o v i d e d b o n d c o u n s e l s e r v i c e s i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e f i n a n c i n g s a n d o t h e r m a t t e r s r e l a t e d t o t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m , i n c l u d i n g t h e S R - 9 1 C I P . O r r i c k h a s a h i g h l e v e l u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m a n d r e l a t e d f i n a n c i n g s a n d c o m p l e x t o l l - s u p p o r t e d d e b t a g r e e m e n t s . I t a l s o h a s s i g n i f i c a n t e x p e r i e n c e w i t h o t h e r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a g e n c i e s , e s p e c i a l l y s e l f - h e l p c o u n t i e s . A c c o r d i n g l y , s t a f f d e t e r m i n e d i t w o u l d b e m o r e e f f i c i e n t a n d c o s t e f f e c t i v e t o c o n t i n u e t o r e t a i n O r r i c k f o r t h e p o s s i b l e i s s u a n c e o r r e f i n a n c i n g o f s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e d e b t i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e e x t e n s i o n , s u b s t i t u t i o n , o r t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e l i q u i d i t y f a c i l i t i e s t h a t s u p p o r t t h e c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m a n d t h e 2 0 0 9 v a r i a b l e r a t e s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d s . R a y G o r s k i F o r o v e r t e n y e a r s , M r . G o r s k i h a s p r i m a r i l y p r o v i d e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s w i t h a i r q u a l i t y t e c h n i c a l a s s e s s m e n t s f o r C o n g e s t i o n M i t i g a t i o n a n d A i r Q u a l i t y ( C M A Q ) f u n d e d p r o j e c t s t h r o u g h o u t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . A d d i t i o n a l l y , h e p r o v i d e d a i r q u a l i t y a s s e s s m e n t s f o r o t h e r f u n d s o u r c e s r e q u i r i n g a n a l y s e s t h a t q u a n t i f y t h e i m p a c t s o f p r o j e c t s o n a i r q u a l i t y . T h e s e a i r q u a l i t y a s s e s s m e n t s a r e r e q u i r e d b y f e d e r a l a g e n c i e s i n o r d e r t o q u a l i f y a n d c o m p e t e f o r f u n d i n g . H i s a i r q u a l i t y a s s e s s m e n t s / r e p o r t s a r e s u b m i t t e d t o C a l t r a n s a n d t h e F e d e r a l H i g h w a y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n f o r e v e r y C M A Q - f u n d e d p r o j e c t f o r a c c e p t a n c e a n d c o n c u r r e n c e a n d h a v e a l w a y s m e t t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r r e p o r t i n g a i r q u a l i t y e m i s s i o n s . M r . G o r s k i i s w e l l v e r s e d w i t h e m i s s i o n s m o d e l s a n d u p d a t e s a s a c o n s u l t a n t w i t h t h e S o u t h C o a s t A i r M a n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t a n d w o r k s w i t h o t h e r s t a t e a n d n a t i o n a l a g e n c i e s a n d c o a l i t i o n s , s u c h a s t h e E n v i r o n m e n t a l P r o t e c t i o n A g e n c y a n d C a l i f o r n i a A i r R e s o u r c e s B o a r d , r e g a r d i n g q u a n t i f y i n g a n d q u a l i f y i n g e m i s s i o n s a s s e s s m e n t s o f v a r i o u s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s . M r . G o r s k i i s a n e x p e r t i n t h i s f i e l d a n d h a s a n e x c e l l e n t r e p u t a t i o n , w h i c h e n h a n c e s t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a b i l i t y t o h a v e i t s p r o j e c t s a p p r o v e d f o r f u n d i n g w i t h o u t a n y i s s u e s o r d e l a y s . A g e n d a I t e m 9 F 1 4 0 Trapeze Proposals were solicited for a ridematching software program for the Inland Empire, and a contract was awarded to Trapeze in 2002. Subsequently the software/license agreement was expanded to include Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties functionality. The software was customized over the past years in response to the unique regional air quality requirements. As a result of the customization and five -county regional partnership, this contract has been included in the recurring contracts since FY 2005/06 for software maintenance services and is included this year for a six-month period to facilitate a seamless transition to the new regional rideshare software. Specialized Services for Multiple Year Contracts Beacon In January 2012, Beacon was selected to provide Measure A and Local Transportation Fund sales tax forecasting services under a sole source procurement and single signature authority by the Executive Director. The sales tax forecasts were performed on a semiannual basis for a two-year period that concluded in May 2013. Beacon built a reputation as one of California's leading economic research firms. In 2010 under a separate agreement, Beacon conducted an economic inipact study of the SR-91 CIP. Beacon's sales tax forecasts have been utilized by the Commission in connection with debt financings and strategic planning the past two years. As a result of Beacon's significant experience forecasting the economies of the nation, the state, and the Inland Empire area and its development of highly valued, proprietary economic forecast models, staff recommends the Commission enter into a new five-year agreement with Beacon to provide continuity and maintain consistency in the development of sales tax forecasts. MuniServices In December 2007, the Commission awarded an agreement, under a sole source procurement, to MuniServices to provide sales and use tax services through June 2013. These services consist of quarterly sales tax analysis and reporting services at a specified fee plus additional fees contingent on additional sales tax revenue generated from the transactions and use tax (sales tax) audit services. The quarterly analysis and related reports provided by MuniServices are included in quarterly sales tax updates to the Commission, as well as to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank (JPMorgan), who provides liquidity support to the 2009 variable rate sales tax revenue bonds under standby bond purchase agreements (SBPAs). These quarterly updates are required reports per the SBPAs and have been provided to the rating • Agenda Item 9F 141 " " a g e n c i e s a n d T I F I A i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e S R - 9 1 C I P f i n a n c i n g . F u r t h e r m o r e , d u r i n g a n d a f t e r t h e r e c e s s i o n , t h e q u a r t e r l y a n a l y s i s a n d r e p o r t s p r o v i d e d i m p o r t a n t a n d u s e f u l i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e e c o n o m i c c a t e g o r i e s a n d s e g m e n t s t h a t g e n e r a t e M e a s u r e A s a l e s t a x e s . O n a n a n n u a l b a s i s , M u n i S e r v i c e s a l s o p e r f o r m s a d d i t i o n a l a n a l y s i s o f t h e t a x a b l e s a l e s d a t a f o r t h e u n i n c o r p o r a t e d a r e a s R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y i n o r d e r t o d e t e r m i n e t h e a m o u n t f o r e a c h o f t h e t h r e e g e o g r a p h i c a r e a s i n t h e c o u n t y . S u c h i n f o r m a t i o n i s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f a n n u a l M e a s u r e A a l l o c a t i o n s . A s a r e s u l t o f t h e l a s t f o u r c i t y i n c o r p o r a t i o n i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h i s g e o g r a p h i c a l t a x a b l e s a l e s i n f o r m a t i o n w a s c r i t i c a l i n d e t e r m i n i n g M e a s u r e A a l l o c a t i o n s t o t h e n e w c i t i e s a n d t h e c o u n t y . I n r e g a r d t o t h e s a l e s t a x a u d i t s e r v i c e s p e r f o r m e d b y M u n i S e r v i c e s t h r o u g h D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2 ( m o s t r e c e n t p e r i o d a v a i l a b l e ) , t h e S t a t e B o a r d o f E q u a l i z a t i o n ( S B O E ) a p p r o v e d c o r r e c t i o n s f o r a t o t a l s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e r e c o v e r y o f $ 2 , 8 8 0 , 7 7 1 . T h i s e q u a t e s t o a 3 6 9 p e r c e n t r e t u r n o n t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s i n v e s t m e n t ; s t a t e d a n o t h e r w a y , f o r e v e r y $ 1 t h e C o m m i s s i o n h a s i n v e s t e d i n M u n i S e r v i c e s ' s a l e s t a x a u d i t s e r v i c e s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n h a s r e c e i v e d $ 3 . 6 9 i n r e t u r n . I n o r d e r t o p r o v i d e c o n t i n u i t y o f t h e s a l e s t a x a u d i t s e r v i c e s a n d i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h t h e S B O E r e g a r d i n g c l a i m s f o r c o r r e c t i o n s o f s a l e s t a x a l l o c a t i o n s a n d t o p r o v i d e c o n s i s t e n c y i n s a l e s t a x a n a l y s i s a n d r e p o r t i n g t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d e x t e r n a l u s e r s o f t h e i n f o r m a t i o n , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e C o m m i s s i o n e n t e r i n t o a n e w a g r e e m e n t f o r t h e s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d b y M u n i S e r v i c e s . F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t : Y e s Y e a r : F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 A m o u n t : $ 1 5 , 0 8 2 , 0 0 0 S o u r c e o f F u n d s : M e a s u r e A , T D A , T U M F , F S P , S A F E F e e s , I n t e r e s t , a n d O t h e r R e i m b u r s e m e n t s B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t : N / A G L A N o . : V a r i o u s F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d : \ 4 4 , 1 � , u D a t e : 0 5 / 2 8 / 1 3 A g e n d a I t e m 9 F 1 4 2 'TY • - • • " " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : D a v i d T h o m a s , T o l l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : A g r e e m e n t w i t h N o s s a m a n L L P f o r O n - C a l l S t r a t e g i c P a r t n e r s h i p A d v i s o r S e r v i c e s - A m e n d m e n t S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 6 - 6 6 - 0 2 8 - 1 2 , A m e n d m e n t N o . 9 t o A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 6 - 6 6 - 0 2 8 - 0 0 , f o r t h e o n - c a l l s t r a t e g i c p a r t n e r s h i p a d v i s o r s e r v i c e s w i t h N o s s a m a n L L P ( N o s s a m a n ) b y e x t e n d i n g t h e c o n t r a c t t e r m o f p e r f o r m a n c e t o M a r c h 9 , 2 0 1 8 , a n d a u g m e n t i n g t h e a g r e e m e n t f o r a n a d d i t i o n a l a m o u n t n o t t o e x c e e d $ 2 . 4 m i l l i o n p l u s a c o n t i n g e n c y o f $ 2 4 0 , 0 0 0 , f o r a t o t a l a u t h o r i z e d c o n t r a c t v a l u e o f $ 8 , 3 5 2 , 9 3 5 ; 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r o r E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r ; p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d 3 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r o r d e s i g n e e t o a p p r o v e c o n t i n g e n c y w o r k u p t o t h e t o t a l a u t h o r i z e d a m o u n t a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n A p r i l 2 0 0 6 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n e n t e r e d i n t o a n a g r e e m e n t f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f p r o v i d i n g s t r a t e g i c p a r t n e r s h i p a d v i s o r s e r v i c e s w i t h N o s s a m a n f o r i n n o v a t i v e p r o j e c t f i n a n c i n g a n d e v a l u a t i o n o f p o t e n t i a l t o l l r o a d c o r r i d o r s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , s p e c i f i c a l l y t h e S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 C o r r i d o r I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t ( S R - 9 1 C I P ) a n d I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 T o l l e d E x p r e s s L a n e ( T E L ) p r o j e c t . T h e c u r r e n t c o n t r a c t t e r m o f p e r f o r m a n c e i s t h r o u g h F e b r u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 4 . O v e r t h e c o u r s e o f t h e l a s t s e v e r a l y e a r s , N o s s a m a n c o m p l e t e d , o r i s i n t h e m i d s t o f c o m p l e t i n g , t h e f o l l o w i n g t a s k s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i t s s t r a t e g i c p a r t n e r s h i p s e r v i c e s c o n t r a c t . A g r e e m e n t s N o s s a m a n h a s b e e n i n t e g r a l i n n e g o t i a t i n g , p r e p a r i n g , a n d e x e c u t i n g v a r i o u s a g r e e m e n t s r e l a t e d t o t h e S R - 9 1 C I P w i t h t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A g e n d a I t e m 9 G 1 4 3 Authority (OCTA), Cofiroute USA LLC (Cofiroute), California Transportation Commission (OTC), Caltrans and the city of Corona. Specific agreements include the OCTA/Commission cooperative agreement, Cofiroute/Commission toll systems installation agreement, Caltrans/Commission toll facility agreement, and Caltrans/Commission design -build cooperative agreement. Design -Build Procurement Nossaman also took the lead or assisted in various procurement activities: • • Request for qualifications process; Risk allocation workshops; Design -build (DB) contract; Review of technical provisions prepared by the project and construction manager (PCM); DB industry review process; Request for proposals (RFP) process, including post-RFP issuance; DB proposals evaluation; and DB contract award and negotiations with selected team. Transportation infrastructure Finance Innovation Act Financing Nossaman assisted the Commission in the preparation of several Transportation Infrastructure Finance Innovation Act (TIFIA) letters of interest, preparation of the TIFIA application, and ongoing negotiations of the TIFIA loan agreement including its terms and conditions. 1-15 Nossaman has been engaged in the I-15 TEL project since 2006 in the areas of toll feasibility, method of project delivery, and tolling authority. Increase in Scope of Work The scope of services to the Nossaman contract associated with this amendment for the SR-91 CIP and 1-15 TEL project is summarized below. This amendment does not include services to support the procurement of the 1-15 TEL project. Such amendment will be submitted to the Commission at a future date as a separate request after determination of the project delivery method. • Agenda Item 9G 144 " S R - 9 1 C / P " A s s i s t w i t h f i n a n c i a l c l o s e f o r t h e T I F I A l o a n a n d t o l l r e v e n u e b o n d i s s u a n c e ; " A s s i s t w i t h c o n t r a c t s t a r t - u p , N o t i c e t o P r o c e e d ( N T P ) 1 a c t i v i t i e s a n d N T P 2 i s s u a n c e p r o c e s s ; " P a r t i c i p a t e i n c o n t r a c t a d m i n i s t r a t i o n t r a i n i n g w o r k s h o p s ; " P a r t i c i p a t e i n r e g u l a r l y s c h e d u l e d c o n t r a c t a d m i n i s t r a t i o n / r i s k m a n a g e m e n t c a l l s ; " A s s i s t w i t h c o n t r a c t i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , a n a l y s i s , a n d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n i s s u e s ; " A s s i s t w i t h c h a n g e o r d e r a n d c l a i m s m a n a g e m e n t s t r a t e g y ; " R e v i e w , a n a l y z e , a n d r e s p o n d t o D B c o n t r a c t o r c h a n g e o r d e r r e q u e s t s ; " R e v i e w , a n a l y z e , a n d r e s e a r c h C o m m i s s i o n / D B c o n t r a c t o r c h a n g e o r d e r r e q u e s t s ; " A s s i s t i n d r a f t i n g , r e v i e w a n d n e g o t i a t i o n o f c h a n g e o r d e r s ; " A s s i s t w i t h p r o s e c u t i o n o f a n y c o n t r a c t d i s p u t e s ; a n d " O t h e r p r o j e c t - r e l a t e d a c t i v i t i e s a s d i r e c t e d b y s t a f f . / - 1 5 T E L P r o j e c t " S u p p o r t d e l i v e r y o p t i o n a n a l y s i s a c t i v i t i e s , i n c l u d i n g p r o c u r e m e n t s t r u c t u r i n g a n d d e l i v e r y m e t h o d d e c i s i o n ; " S u p p o r t f e a s i b i l i t y a n a l y s i s a c t i v i t i e s r e l a t e d t o u p d a t e d t r a f f i c a n d r e v e n u e s t u d i e s ; " A s s i s t w i t h a n d p a r t i c i p a t e i n C o m m i t t e e a n d C o m m i s s i o n p r e s e n t a t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g a s s i s t a n c e w i t h s t a f f r e p o r t s , a g e n d a m a t e r i a l s , a n d p r e s e n t a t i o n s ; " S u p p o r t d e v e l o p m e n t o f p o t e n t i a l l e g i s l a t i o n f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o g a i n t h e n e e d e d a u t h o r i t y t o d e l i v e r t h e 1 - 1 5 T E L p r o j e c t ; a n d " O t h e r p r o j e c t - r e l a t e d a c t i v i t i e s a s d i r e c t e d b y s t a f f . S c h e d u l e o f W o r k S R - 9 1 C / P T h e s c h e d u l e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e S R - 9 1 C I P w i l l p r o v i d e f o r t h e c o n t i n u a t i o n o f s e r v i c e s t h r o u g h p r o j e c t c l o s e o u t i n M a r c h 2 0 1 8 . / - 1 5 T E L P r o j e c t T h e s c h e d u l e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e 1 - 1 5 T E L p r o j e c t w i l l e x t e n d t h r o u g h J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 4 . F u t u r e 1 - 1 5 T E L a d d i t i o n a l p r o j e c t w o r k s u b j e c t t o a f u t u r e c o n t r a c t a m e n d m e n t w i l l b e d e t e r m i n e d d u r i n g F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 a f t e r t h e C o m m i s s i o n d e t e r m i n e s t h e m e t h o d o f p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y f o r t h e p r o j e c t . A g e n d a I t e m 9 G 1 4 5 Cost of Work SR-91 C/P The increase in the scope of services for the SR-91 CIP consists of $2,150,000 plus a contingency of $215,000, for a total not to exceed amount of $2,365,000 through March 9, 2018. /-15 TEL Project The increase in the scope of services for the 1-15 TEL project consists of $200,000 for specific 1-15 related services as well as $50,000 to support potential legislation and a contingency of $25,000, for a total not to exceed amount of $275,000. Financial Information Yes FY 2012/13 $300,000 In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2013/14 Amount: $670,000 - N/A FY 2014/15 + $1,670,000 Commercial Paper, Sales Tax and No Source of funds: Toll Bond Proceeds, TIFIA Loan Budget Adjustment: ` No Proceeds N/A GLA No.: 003028 65520 262 31 65520 $2,365,000 003027 65520 262 31 65520 $275,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Vlifmdavitffi Date: 05/28/13 Attachment: Agreement No. 06-66-028-12 Agenda Item 9G 146 " A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 6 - 6 6 - 0 2 8 - 1 2 A M E N D M E N T N O . 9 T O A G R E E M E N T F O R S T R A T E G I C P A R T N E R S H I P A D V I S O R S E R V I C E S W I T H N O S S A M A N L L P 1 . P A R T I E S A N D D A T E T h i s A m e n d m e n t N o . 9 t o t h e A g r e e m e n t f o r S t r a t e g i c P a r t n e r s h i p A d v i s o r S e r v i c e s i s m a d e a n d e n t e r e d i n t o t h i s d a y o f , 2 0 1 3 , b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N ( " C o m m i s s i o n " ) a n d N O S S A M A N L L P ( " C o n s u l t a n t " ) . 2 . R E C I T A L S 2 . 1 T h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e C o n s u l t a n t h a v e e n t e r e d i n t o a n a g r e e m e n t d a t e d A p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 0 6 f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f p r o v i d i n g S t r a t e g i c P a r t n e r s h i p A d v i s o r S e r v i c e s ( a s a m e n d e d , t h e " M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t " ) . T h e n o t t o e x c e e d a m o u n t o f t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t i s s e t a t O n e H u n d r e d a n d F i f t y T h o u s a n d D o l l a r s ( $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 ) . 2 . 2 T h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e C o n s u l t a n t h a v e e n t e r e d i n t o A m e n d m e n t N o . 1 t o t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t , d a t e d J u l y 2 7 , 2 0 0 6 , f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f i n c r e a s i n g t h e n o t t o e x c e e d a m o u n t o f t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t b y S e v e n t y - F i v e T h o u s a n d D o l l a r s ( $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 ) . 2 . 3 T h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e C o n s u l t a n t h a v e e n t e r e d i n t o A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t , d a t e d O c t o b e r 2 6 , 2 0 0 6 , f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f r e d u c i n g t h e n o t t o e x c e e d a m o u n t o f t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t b y F i f t y T h o u s a n d D o l l a r s ( $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 ) . 2 . 4 T h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e C o n s u l t a n t h a v e e n t e r e d i n t o A m e n d m e n t N o . 3 t o t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t , d a t e d A p r i l 9 , 2 0 0 7 , f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f i n c r e a s i n g t h e n o t t o e x c e e d a m o u n t o f t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t , b y O n e H u n d r e d a n d F i f t y T h o u s a n d D o l l a r s ( $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 ) . N o s s a m a n L L P A m e n d m e n t N o . 9 ( R C T C D o c . N o . 0 6 - 6 6 - 0 2 8 - 1 2 ) 1 7 3 3 6 . 0 0 0 1 8 \ 7 9 6 5 7 8 9 . 2 P a g e 1 1 4 7 2.5 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No, 4 to the Master Agreement, dated February 8, 2008 for the purpose of incorporating additional services into the Scope of Services of the Master Agreement, modifying the Consultant's hourly billing rates, extending the term, and increasing the total not to exceed amount of the Master Agreement by Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000). 2.6 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 5 to the Master Agreement dated July 16, 2008 for the purpose of making consulting services available to the San Bernardino Associated Governments through the Master Agreement. 2.7 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 6 to the Master Agreement, dated January 27, 2010 and Amended and Restated Amendment No. 6 to the Master Agreement, dated March 10, 2010, for the purpose of increasing the total not to exceed amount of the Master Agreement by Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000) and to modify the Consultant's hourly billing rates. 2.8 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 7 to the Master Agreement, dated December 21, 2010 for the purpose of increasing the total not to exceed amount of the Master Agreement by Two Million, Eighty -Three Thousand and Thirty -Five Dollars ($2,083,035). 2.9 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 8 to the Master Agreement, dated February 9, 2012 for the purpose of increasing the total not to exceed amount of the Master Agreement by One Million, Eight Hundred Seventy -Eight Thousand, Nine Hundred Dollars ($1,878,900) and extending the term (the "Third Extended Term") to end February 9, 2014, unless earlier terminated as provided in the Master Agreement 2.10 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement for the purpose of extending the term and to provide additional compensation for the continued provision of Strategic Partnership Advisor Services. 3. TERMS 3.1 The term of the Master Agreement shall be extended for an additional term (the "Fourth Extended Term") beginning February 9, 2014 and Nossaman LLP Amendment No.'9 (RCTC Doc. No. 06-66-028-12) 17336.00018\7965789.2 • • Page 2 • 148 " e n d i n g M a r c h 9 , 2 0 1 8 , u n l e s s e a r l i e r t e r m i n a t e d a s p r o v i d e d i n t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t . 3 . 2 T h e m a x i m u m c o m p e n s a t i o n u n d e r t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t , a s p r e v i o u s l y a m e n d e d , i s h e r e b y i n c r e a s e d b y T w o M i l l i o n , F o u r H u n d r e d T h o u s a n d D o l l a r s ( $ 2 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) . S e e E x h i b i t A . 3 . 3 T h e t o t a l c o n t r a c t v a l u e f o r t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t , a s h e r e t o f o r e a m e n d e d , s h a l l n o t e x c e e d E i g h t M i l l i o n , O n e H u n d r e d T w e l v e T h o u s a n d a n d N i n e H u n d r e d T h i r t y - F i v e D o l l a r s ( $ 8 , 1 1 2 , 9 3 5 ) . 3 . 4 C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e t h e S e r v i c e s , o n a T a s k O r d e r b a s i s , a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . 3 . 5 E x c e p t a s a m e n d e d b y t h i s A m e n d m e n t , a l l p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t , a s a m e n d e d b y A m e n d m e n t s N o . 1 t h r o u g h N o . 8 , i n c l u d i n g w i t h o u t l i m i t a t i o n t h e i n d e m n i t y a n d i n s u r a n c e p r o v i s i o n s , s h a l l r e m a i n i n f u l l f o r c e a n d e f f e c t a n d s h a l l g o v e r n t h e a c t i o n s o f t h e p a r t i e s u n d e r t h i s A m e n d m e n t . [ S i g n a t u r e s o n f o l l o w i n g p a g e ] N o s s a m a n L L P A m e n d m e n t N o . 9 ( R C T C D o c . N o . 0 6 - 6 6 - 0 2 8 - 1 2 ) 1 7 3 3 6 . 0 0 0 1 8 \ 7 9 6 5 7 8 9 . 2 P a g e 3 1 4 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY NOSSAMAN LLP TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Best, Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Name Title Nossaman LLP Amendment No. 9 (RCTC Doc. No. 06-66-028-12) 17336.00018\7965789.2 Page 4 150 " E x h i b i t A ( A t t a c h e d ) S c o p e / F e e / S c h e d u l e N o s s a m a n L L P A m e n d m e n t N o . 9 ( R C T C D o c . N o . 0 6 - 6 6 - 0 2 8 - 1 2 ) 1 7 3 3 6 . 0 0 0 1 8 \ 7 9 6 5 7 8 9 . 2 P a g e 5 1 5 1 " " E x h i b i t A N o s s a m a n S c o p e o f W o r k a n d B u d g e t 1 - 1 5 S c o p e " S u p p o r t d e l i v e r y o p t i o n a n a l y s i s a c t i v i t i e s , i n c l u d i n g p r o c u r e m e n t s t r u c t u r i n g , d e l i v e r y m e t h o d d e c i s i o n " S u p p o r t f e a s i b i l i t y a n a l y s i s a c t i v i t i e s " A s s i s t w i t h a n d p a r t i c i p a t e i n C o m m i t t e e a n d C o m m i s s i o n p r e s e n t a t i o n s r e : s a m e , i n c l u d i n g a s s i s t a n c e w i t h s t a f f r e p o r t s , a g e n d a m a t e r i a l s a n d p r e s e n t a t i o n " O t h e r I - 1 5 - r e l a t e d a c t i v i t i e s a s d i r e c t e d b y s t a f f 1 - 1 5 B u d g e t $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 t h r o u g h J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 4 1 - 1 5 S c o p e A s s u m p t i o n s " 3 C o m m i s s i o n a n d / o r C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g s " 2 - 3 m e e t i n g s w i t h s e n i o r s t a f f ( A n n e / J o h n ) " I n t e r n a l t e a m m e e t i n g s / c a l l s " 2 W h i t e p a p e r s " 2 P r e s e n t a t i o n s , 2 . S R - 9 1 S R - 9 1 S c o p e " A s s i s t w i t h T I F I A a n d t o l l r e v e n u e b o n d f i n a n c i n g c l o s i n g s " A s s i s t w i t h C o n t r a c t s t a r t - u p , N T P 1 a n d N T P 2 i s s u a n c e p r o c e s s " P a r t i c i p a t e i n C o n t r a c t a d m i n i s t r a t i o n t r a i n i n g w o r k s h o p s " P a r t i c i p a t e i n r e g u l a r l y s c h e d u l e d c o n t r a c t a d m i n i s t r a t i o n / r i s k m a n a g e m e n t c a l l s " A s s i s t w i t h C o n t r a c t i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , a n a l y s i s a n d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n i s s u e s " A s s i s t w i t h c h a n g e o r d e r , c l a i m s m a n a g e m e n t s t r a t e g y " R e v i e w , a n a l y z e a n d r e s p o n d t o D B C o n t r a c t o r c h a n g e o r d e r r e q u e s t s " R e v i e w , a n a l y z e a n d r e s e a r c h R C T C / D B C o n t r a c t o r c h a n g e o r d e r r e q u e s t s " A s s i s t i n d r a f t i n g o f , r e v i e w a n d n e g o t i a t i o n o f c h a n g e o r d e r s " A s s i s t w i t h p r o s e c u t i o n o f a n y C o n t r a c t d i s p u t e s " O t h e r S R - 9 1 - r e l a t e d a c t i v i t i e s a s d i r e c t e d b y s t a f f S R - 9 1 B u d g e t $ 2 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 t h r o u g h M a r c h 2 0 1 8 ( c o m p r i s e d o f $ 1 0 0 k f o r 1 s t 3 b u l l e t i t e m s a b o v e a n d t h e n $ 3 5 k / m o n t h b e t w e e n J u l y 1 , 2 0 1 3 a n d M a r c h 2 0 1 8 ) E x h i b i t A - 1 1 5 2 SR-91 Scope Assumptions • Assumes no ongoing protest/litigation arising out of the procurement and award • Assumes financial close in June 2013 with post -financial closing clean-up contemplated thereafter • Contemplates 1 day Contract administration training workshop • Contemplates bi-weekly calls/meetings re: contract administration or risk management • Contemplates periodic meetings with PCM/RCTC re: same • Contemplates routine/basic contract issues analysis, periodic review ;of correspondence with DB Contractor on contract/change order issues and assistance with a reasonable amount of non -material change orders • Major/complex change orders or a material amount of change orders and contract issues are included within the scope but not the budget and additional budget would be required • Assistance with disputes or claims are included within the scope but not the budget and additional budget would be required 3. P3 LEGISLATION P3 Legislation Scope • Support development of potential P3 legislation for CA to extend/improve/replace SBx2 4 • Other P3 legislation related activities as directed by staff P3 Legislation Budget $50,000 through June 30, 2014 P3 Legislation Scope Assumptions • No more than 1 trip to Sacramento envisioned • Ongoing active involvement by RCTC lobbyist and governmental relations personnel 4. EXPENSES Expense Budget $50,000 through March 2018 ($10,000 per year) 5. TOTAL BUDGET • $2,400,000 • Does not include any contingency for RCTC Exhibit A-2 153 Exhibit A-3 154 NOSSAMAN ATTORNEY RATES FOR 2013 Nossaman Team Member Hourly Billing Rates Nossaman Team Member Hourly Billing'' Rates Corey Boock $635 Margo Bennett $590 Nancy Smith $660 Edward Kussy $690 Sandy Kanter $585 Brandon Davis $465 Lisa Montague $330 Barney Allison $680 Fred Kessler $680 Evan Caplicki $540 Patrick Harder $620 Tristan Robinson $275 Brian Papernik $620 Geoff Petrov $465 John Smolen $375 Sid Jimenez $335 Geoff Yarema $745 Yukiko Kojima $520 Tricia de la Pena $485 Christine Ryan $610 Linda Cunningham $610 Peter Denton $400 Kevin Sheys $725 Steve Roberts $675 Robert Thornton $635 David Kimport $560 Carollyn LobeII $475 Jaya Velamakanni $275 Donna Brady $580 April Fromm (Paralegal) $235 Tae Yeon Kim $275 Other Attorneys/Paralegals/Law Clerks Actual Rates Rates will remain in effect through 12/31/13 and then each rate will escalate annually by approximately 5-10%, commencing January 1, 2014. Prior to any increase in the above Rates, Consultant shall be required to obtain the prior written approval of the Commission's Executive Director, or his or her designee. In addition to the hourly rates listed above, Consultant will charge RCTC for the following expenses: (i) actual and reasonable travel expenses, if any; (ii) actual costs of necessary computerized research; (iii) actual costs of postage and courier services; (iv) faxing ($1/page) and copying (20 cents/page); and (v) other appropriate out-of-pocket charges. Exhibit A-4 155 " " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : D a v i d T h o m a s , T o l l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : 2 0 1 3 S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e 2 0 1 3 S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n 2 0 0 2 , A B 1 0 1 0 a u t h o r e d b y f o r m e r A s s e m b l y m a n L o u C o r r e a a l l o w e d t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( O C T A ) t o p u r c h a s e t h e 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s f r a n c h i s e f r o m t h e C a l i f o r n i a P r i v a t e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m p a n y . T h e p u r c h a s e a g r e e m e n t w a s c o m p l e t e d i n J a n u a r y 2 0 0 3 , a t a c o s t o f $ 2 0 7 . 5 m i l l i o n . A B 1 0 1 0 a l s o e l i m i n a t e d t h e e x i s t i n g n o n - c o m p e t e c l a u s e i n t h e f r a n c h i s e a g r e e m e n t t h a t p r o h i b i t e d a n y c a p a c i t y - e n h a n c i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s f r o m b e i n g m a d e t o S R - 9 1 u n t i l t h e y e a r 2 0 3 0 . S B 1 3 1 6 p a s s e d i n A u g u s t 2 0 0 8 , a u t h o r i z i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o i m p o s e t o l l s f o r 5 0 y e a r s o n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f a c i l i t i e s o n i t s p o r t i o n o f S R - 9 1 , a n d a u t h o r i z e d t o l l r e v e n u e s t o b e u s e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i n g a n d o p e r a t i n g t o l l f a c i l i t i e s o n S R - 9 1 i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . T h e p u r c h a s e o f t h e 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s a n d t h e e l i m i n a t i o n o f t h e n o n - c o m p e t e c l a u s e a l l o w e d m u c h n e e d e d i m p r o v e m e n t s t o b e p l a n n e d a n d i m p l e m e n t e d w i t h i n t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r . O C T A , t h e C o m m i s s i o n , a n d C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t s 8 a n d 1 2 h a v e b e e n c o o r d i n a t i n g t h e s e i m p r o v e m e n t s . S B 1 3 1 6 r e q u i r e d c r e a t i o n o f a n e w a d v i s o r y c o m m i t t e e w i t h s p e c i f i c r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s a p p o i n t e d b y b o a r d m e m b e r s f r o m O C T A a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n . S B 1 3 1 6 a l s o r e q u i r e d t h e c o n t i n u a t i o n o f a n n u a l u p d a t e s o f a n i m p l e m e n t a t i o n p l a n o f S R - 9 1 i m p r o v e m e n t s f o r t h e L e g i s l a t u r e . A s s p e l l e d o u t i n t h e l e g i s l a t i o n , t h e 2 0 1 3 S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n w a s c o m p l e t e d b y O C T A , i n c o n s u l t a t i o n w i t h C a l t r a n s a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n , a n d d e t a i l s p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t s a n d c o m p l e t i o n s c h e d u l e s f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s t o M e t r o l i n k , e x p r e s s b u s , f r e e w a y s a n d i n t e r c h a n g e s , n e w e a s t - w e s t h i g h w a y c o r r i d o r s , a n d h i g h - s p e e d r a i l . " A t t a c h m e n t : 2 0 1 3 S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n A g e n d a I t e m 9 H 1 5 6 91 igat 4 n.o.re b. 0 ,o # t , T'OF 2013 State Route 91 ' Implementation Plan V • t4111, a 4.-* i , { i' Illi s 4 S _ ■ Z _ ..; .r /f a") )11 gah f i •••• 411, • ■ inr t441/ • MAY 2013 • TABLE OF CONTENTS • • TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: 2013 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 BY YEAR 2015 10 BY YEAR 2025 13 BY YEAR 2035 19 BY POST-2035 19 SECTION 3: COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS 27 SECTION 4: REFERENCES 32 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SECTION 1: • 2013 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE INTRODUCTION Previous law authorized the California. Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in California. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Orange County. The four -lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of State Route 91 (SR-91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County Line and State Route 55 (SR-55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehicle on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users tens of millions of hours of commuting time (over 50 million hours since 2003). While the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the SR-91 corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the California Private Transportation Company (CPTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies from adding transportation capacity or operational 41) improvements to the SR-91 corridor through the year 2030 from Interstate 15 (1-15) in Riverside County to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties border. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. • Recognizing the need to eliminate the non -compete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) (AB 1010) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much - needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers who use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Orange Counties each day. The bill allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and eliminate the existing clause that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed on January 3, 2003, placing the road in public hands at a cost of $207.5 million. With the elimination of the non -compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by OCTA, Orange County and Riverside County public officials and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) (SB 1316) was signed into law in September 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. SB 1316 also requires OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and RCTC, to issue an annual SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) and a proposed completion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR-57) to 1-15. The Plans prior to adoption of SB 1316 included a westerly project limit of SR-55. The Plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential excess, toll revenue and other funds. This 2013 Plan is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Plan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2012 report, which was a major update of the previous annual Implementation Plans. This year's update includes projects identified in the Riverside County — Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year Westem County Highway Delivery Plan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes from the Orange/Riverside County Line to 1-15, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and the Renewed Measure M program that provides funding for transportation projects in Orange County. The 2013 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, time frames for project packages to improve mobility on SR-91, and are listed based on a logical sequence for implementation. Project descriptions include conceptual 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 159 1 lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estimates (in 2013 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This Plan will provide OCTA, RCTC, and Ca!trans with a framework to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual Plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the Plan. SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segment of SR-91 from west of the junction of SR-57 and SR-91 in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, to east of the junction of SR-91 and 1-15 in the City of Corona in Riverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and includes approximately 12.7 miles within Orange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Riverside County. Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic conditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carrying capacity of the facility is inadequate to accommodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is defined as -a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/mile. The results also indicate that there are several physical constraints that generate unacceptable traffic queues. The following list summarizes the deficiencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: ❖ Heavy traffic volumes from 1-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91. The weaving and merging condition is complicated by the close proximity of the Westbound (WB) Main Street off -ramp. ❖ High demand from several on -ramps within the eastern segment exacerbates traffic conditions during peak hours. ❖ High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. ❖ The Eastem Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) merges with SR-91 causing additional 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 160 congestion in the EB direction. One of the two EB lanes from State Route 241 (SR-241) is dropped at the merge to State Route 91 (SR-91). ❖ Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing WB and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. ❖ SR-55 merges with SR-91. An EB lane on SR-91 is dropped at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped at Imperial Highway creating a severe merge condition. ❖ WB SR-91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR-55, which contributes to mainline congestion. This drop also occurs on the left-hand side of SR-91 as opposed to the typical right-hand exit. ❖ High demand from Weir Canyon Road, Imperial Highway and Lakeview Avenue increases delay during the peak hours. ❖ WB traffic entering SR-91 at Lakeview Avenue to southbound (SB) SR-55 contributes to mainline congestion by weaving through three lanes on WB SR-91. PROJECT SUMMARY Many of the projects identified in this 2013 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS as well as through subsequent project development. Table 1 summarizes the various pending and completed projects in the 2013 Plan, and they are outlined below by implementation/construction schedule (see Section 2 for detailed pending project summaries and Section 3 for completed project summaries): ❖ The first set of projects is anticipated to be completed by 2015 and includes two improvements at a total cost of approximately $111.2 million. The projects include the Metrolink short-term expansion plan and a new SR-91 WB lane at Tustin Avenue. These projects are in the process of final design, construction, or procurement and implementation, as noted in the project summaries. ❖ Five projects for implementation by 2025 include the Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of the County Line, add collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at I-15/SR-91, and extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and provide system/local interchange improvements; Express Bus improvements; interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91; a SR-241/SR-91 Express Lanes connector; and SR-91 widening improvements between SR-57 and SR-55. OCTA, RCTC, and Ca!trans have initiated preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Preliminary engineering has been initiated for the highway improvement projects. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. Projects for implementation by 2025 would cost approximately from $1.86 billion to $2.05 billion. ❖ Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer -lead time projects and include: a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; a significant expansion of Metrolink service; and the Ultimate CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15 Long-range projects for implementation by Post- 2035 include an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15, the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail, and the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4- lane facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B). These three multi -billion dollar potential projects require a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. In some cases, these projects may include previous projects as project components, such that all projects within this summary may not be implemented. Appx. No. A C D Project No, 1 2 Table 1 — SR-91 Implementation Plan Projects Completed Project Summary :; Since2007 Cost (Constructed Year) ($M) Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement (March 2009) North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure (June 2009) Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 (September 2010) Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5'h GP Lane in Each Direction (January 2013) Project Summary (Implementation Year) By Year 2015 Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan (2014) SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue (2015) SUBTOTAL 24.3 25 51.2 85.2 Cost ($M) 66 45.2 111.2 Traffic Analysis For the 2013 Plan, the traffic analysis for major SR-91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2012 Plan. ioThis analysis used the latest freeway operations software 10 By Year 2025 Initial Phase CIP: Widen SR-91 by.One :GP Lane in Each Direction East of County Line; CC Roads and 1=15/SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension'of Express,Lanes to 1-15 and SysteM/Locel Inte'ehange'lmprovements (2017) Epress.Bus Improvemen(,�Setween Orange County and Riverside County (2017) SR-71/SR=91 tnterclaenge Inrproyements"(2016) 122.7 SR-241/SR-91 Express Lane's Cdrinector (2018) 135-150' SR-91 between.SR-57 andS1R-55 (2026 253=425 ,A 1,865 - SUBTOTAL $yYesr20 Fairmont Boulevard libprovements (Post 2025) Metrolink.Service and Station Improvements j2030J t Ultimate ClP Widen R 91 by One GP Lane itl,;Eat. Direction froraSR 241 to SR--71, 115/SR 91 Direct North connector, Extensidp of -Ex ress t'anegon 1-154and•SR- 91 Improvements East of 1715 (2035) ' SUBTOTAL By Post-2035 Elevated'4-Lane Facl1i1y Gill; 1-15 (Post-203) Anaheirri to Ofitario.lnlern,att Speed:Reit (Post 2035} � 13 Irvine -Corona. Expressway,OCE) 4 Lane Facliity ft 8R-241/SR-1 310115/C4a Road (Post-4 ;SUBTOTAL Brat Airport h4adlevHigl 2;052 412+, 4350, 14.780 ;€ model available from UC Berkeley and traffic data calibrated to reflect new traffic patterns since the 2012 Plan. This freeway operations model provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 161 compared to traditional travel demand models. The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models. This approach is especially important given high SR-91 traffic volumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic. For example, a minor freeway merging area can cause many vehicles to slow, cascading delay through the traffic stream, and suddenly both speed and volume rapidly decrease for major segments of the freeway. The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for WB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the following major capacity enhancing projects: • New WB/EB lanes from SR-71 to 1-15 by 2017 (Initial CIP, Project 3). • SR-241/SR-91 Express Lanes connector with lanes to Coal Canyon on SR-91 by 2018 (Project 6). • EB lane between SR-57 and SR-55 by 2025 (Project 7). • New WB/EB lanes, various segments, from SR-241 to 1-15 by 2035 (Ultimate CIP, Project 10). ❖ New capacity provided by Corridor A and Irvine - Corona Expressway (ICE) by Post-2035 (Projects 11 and 13). The WB morning traffic analysis shows a decrease for the baseline travel times from 2012 to 2013 primarily as a result of widening the SR-91 between the SR-55 and the SR-241 by adding a 5t General Purpose lane in each direction. Traffic analysis results indicate that the year 2015 forecasts, bottlenecks are shown at the Orange - Riverside County line and at the SR-55 interchange. A minor bottleneck is shown at the SR-241 interchange. The main bottlenecks in Riverside County have decreased because of the completion of proposed projects, though some congestion is still forecasted. In the year 2025 forecast, WB bottlenecks occur at Main Street, the Orange -Riverside County Line, at the SR-241 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN interchange, and at the SR-55 interchange. Assuming Corridor A and the ICE are not constructed by the year 2035, bottlenecks appear at Main Street, just east of the io SR-71 interchange, at the Orange -Riverside County Line, at the SR-241 interchange, and at the SR-55 interchange.. For the Post-2035 timeframe, the construction of Corridors A and ICE is forecast to notably improve WB operations along the SR-91 freeway. A bottleneck is shown at the $R-55 interchange. The EB evening traffic analysis shows a decrease for the baseline travel times from 2012 to 2013 primarily as a result of widening the SR-91 between the SR-55 and the SR-241 by adding a 5th General Purpose lane in each direction. The traffic analysis also indicates that for the year 2015 forecasts, bottlenecks are shown shortly before the SR-55 interchange, at the Orange -Riverside County Line, and at Lincoln Avenue. In the year 2025 forecast, EB bottlenecks are still shown west of the SR-55 interchange and at the Orange -Riverside County Line. The bottleneck at Lincoln Avenue and queuing in Riverside County have largely decreased because of the completion of proposed projects, though some congestion is still forecasted. For the 2035 horizon year, bottlenecks appear at SR-55, at the SR-241 interchange, and at Lincoln Avenue. For the Post-2035 horizon year, the construction of Corridor A and the -ICE is forecast to notably improve EB operations along the SR-91 freeway. A bottleneck is shown before the SR-55 interchange, and some minor congestion is shown at the SR-241 and in short stretches within Riverside County. The introduction of Corridors A and ICE by Post-2035 offers the potential capacity to manage future SR-91 traffic demand in both directions. While both of these corridors are still concepts, they provide substantial relief to EB and WB traffic congestion in the future. Further feasibility studies will determine if one or both concepts move forward in the project development process. The charts below describe the travel time benefits by year including these various project concepts. 162 Figure 1-1 — Mainline Westbound SR-91 from 1-15 to SR-57 A.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time Mainline Westbound SR-91 From I-15 to SR-57 AM Peak Hour Average Travel Time (in Minutes) Emstin{ {20121 2015 130ra ge oxm 2025 e erside =Clnunty 2035 Post 2035 Figure 1-2 Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to 1-15 P.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to I-15 PM Peak Hau EKistin 2012) 2015 Average Travel Time (in Minutes) 2025 Cl Rive€side Gonna PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan was approved. The 2013 Plan includes select completed project exhibits as a historical reference, see Section 3. Recently Completed Constructionllmprovement Projects As of June 2013, the following physical improvements have been constructed/implemented: ❖ Repave and seal pavement surfaces, restripe, and replace raised channelizers on the 91 Express Lanes. •:• EB SR-91 restripe and median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 163 extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR-71 to the Serfas Club Drive off -ramp. • WB auxiliary lane extension between the County Line and SR-241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County Line to SR-241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehicle progression. s• WB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR-71 and the County Line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR-71 & SR-241. ❖ Express Bus improvements are implemented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Coast Metro route and Village at Orange to Riverside/Corona service. ❖ Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were improved, lanes were re -striped, illumination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. ❖ Green River Road overcrossing replacement (See Section 3). • Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station (See Section 3). ❖ EB SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 (See Section 3). ❖ New travel lanes between SR-55 and SR-241 (See Section 3). These projects provide enhanced freeway capacity and improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of SR-91. The completed EB SR-91 lane addition project from SR- 241 to SR-71 (See Section 3) has greatly enhanced highway operations. This accounts for some of the improvement in existing EB p.m. peak hour travel time from approximately 70+ minutes in 2010 to approximately 50 minutes in 2012. In addition, there are two projects that are currently in the project development or environmental phase that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SARM) .improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved Prado Dam (near SR-71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps' project, existing riverbanks are being improved due to the increased capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cubic 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 164 feet per second (cfs) compared to the previous facility capacity of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segment of the Santa Ana River to be improved is Reach 9 Phase 2A, • which includes areas along SR-91 from just east of the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing to SR-71. SR-91 project design teams have coordinated with the Corps, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 by relocating the Santa Ana River. This will greatly enhance the ability of Caltrans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps SARM Reach 9 improvements were under construction as of September 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "stimulus" funding and were mostly completed by June 2013. The other project with a direct impact to SR-91 is the $120 million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SARI line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and is in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI -line outside of the floodplain, which is immediately adjacent to SR-91, highway R/W was relinquished to the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the W OCFCD, Caltrans, and other federal, regional; and local agencies in order to accommodate planned SR-91 improvements within the remaining State R/W subsequent to relinquishment. This project completed the preliminary engineering phase and construction is scheduled to be completed by February 2014. Recently Completed PSRs and other Reports In addition to the physical improvements in the corridor, there are several reports and PSRs that are completed, in draft form, or anticipated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide improved mobility: The reports and PSRs include (also see Section 4): ❖ MIS - Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). ❖ Project Study Report "On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County" (October 2006). • Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). " : " P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t f o r S R - 7 1 / S R - 9 1 I n t e r c h a n g e ( D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 6 ) . V' R C T C 1 0 - Y e a r W e s t e r n C o u n t y H i g h w a y D e l i v e r y P l a n ( D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 6 ) . " 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s E x t e n s i o n a n d S t a t e R o u t e 2 4 1 C o n n e c t o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ( M a r c h 2 0 0 9 ) . : " P l a n s , S p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d E s t i m a t e s ( P S & E ) f o r E a s t b o u n d S R - 9 1 l a n e a d d i t i o n f r o m S R - 2 4 1 t o S R - 7 1 ( M a y 2 0 0 9 ) . : " S R - 9 1 F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y f r o m S R - 5 7 t o S R - 5 5 ( J u n e 2 0 0 9 ) . : " S R - 9 1 / F a i r m o n t B o u l e v a r d F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ( D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 9 ) . " C o r r i d o r S y s t e m M a n a g e m e n t P l a n ( C S M P ) O r a n g e C o u n t y S R - 9 1 C o r r i d o r F i n a l R e p o r t ( A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 ) . V' P S & E " O n S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 B e t w e e n t h e S R - 9 1 / S R - 5 5 I n t e r c h a n g e a n d t h e S R - 9 1 / S R - 2 4 1 I n t e r c h a n g e i n O r a n g e C o u n t y " ( A p r i l 2 0 1 1 ) . " R e n e w e d M e a s u r e M E a r l y A c t i o n P l a n , a p p r o v e d A u g u s t 2 0 0 7 a n d s u b s e q u e n t l y r e n a m e d a s t h e C a p i t a l A c t i o n P l a n ( A p r i l 2 0 1 1 ) . U p d a t e s f r o m t h e 2 0 1 2 S R - 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d p r o g r e s s n o t e d a b o v e , t h e f o l l o w i n g i t e m s t h a t w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e 2 0 1 2 S R - 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n h a v e b e e n m o d i f i e d f o r t h e 2 0 1 3 P l a n u p d a t e : " P r o j e c t s c h e d u l e s h a v e b e e n r e v i s e d s u c h t h a t t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f p r o j e c t s h a s m o v e d s o m e o f t h e m i n t o n e w h o r i z o n y e a r s . " V a r i o u s p r o j e c t d e s c r i p t i o n s , c o s t s , a n d s c h e d u l e s h a v e b e e n u p d a t e d f r o m t h e 2 0 1 2 P l a n b a s e d o n c o n t i n u e d p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t . I C E S T A T U S S U M M A R Y T h e I C E p r o j e c t c o n c e p t ( s e e P r o j e c t # 1 3 ) w a s c o n c e i v e d a s p a r t o f t h e 2 0 0 6 R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y O r a n g e C o u n t y M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y ( M I S ) a n d w a s e s t a b l i s h e d a s p a r t o f a s u i t e o f p r o j e c t s t o s u p p o r t f u t u r e p e a k d e m a n d v o l u m e s b e t w e e n R i v e r s i d e a n d O r a n g e C o u n t i e s . I C E w a s f u r t h e r e v a l u a t e d i n 2 0 0 9 f o r f i n a n c i a l a n d g e o t e c h n i c a l f e a s i b i l i t y . S e v e n ( 7 ) p r i m a r y f e a s i b i l i t y i s s u e s w e r e c o n s i d e r e d : G e o l o g i c , H y d r o g e o l o g i c / H y d r o l o g i c , a n d G e o t e c h n i c a l C o n d i t i o n s V' C o r r i d o r C o n c e p t s ( f u l l t u n n e l a n d p a r t i a l t u n n e l l p a r t i a l s u r f a c e r o a d ) V' T u n n e l C o n f i g u r a t i o n V' T u n n e l e x c a v a t i o n a n d s u p p o r t M e t h o d s V' T u n n e l S y s t e m s ( e . g . V e n t i l a t i o n , E m e r g e n c y f i r e s y s t e m , o p e r a t i o n b u i l d i n g , t o l l s y s t e m , e t c . ) " 3 C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n s i d e r a t i o n s V' C o n s t r u c t i o n , O p e r a t i o n & M a i n t e n a n c e ( 0 & M ) C o s t s A t t h e c o n c l u s i o n o f t h e f i n a n c i a l a n d g e o t e c h n i c a l f e a s i b i l i t y s t u d y i n 2 0 1 0 , R i v e r s i d e O r a n g e C o r r i d o r A u t h o r i t y B o a r d ( R O C A ) d i r e c t e d s t a f f t o s h e l v e t h e p r o j e c t d u e t o i t s h i g h c o n s t r u c t i o n c o s t a n d t h e d i f f i c u l t e c o n o m i c c l i m a t e , a n d t o r e e v a l u a t e t h e p r o j e c t o n a n a n n u a l b a s i s d u r i n g t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e S R - 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n . T h e N a t i o n a l F o r e s t S e r v i c e h a s c o n t i n u e d m o n i t o r i n g o f t h e g r o u n d w a t e r l e v e l a l o n g t h e p r e l i m i n a r y a l i g n m e n t o f t h e t u n n e l a n d h a s n o t f o u n d a n y s i g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e s s i n c e 2 0 1 0 . T h e t e c h n o l o g i c a l a b i l i t y t o c o n s t r u c t t h e l a r g e - d i a m e t e r t u n n e l s i s c u r r e n t l y a v a i l a b l e ; h o w e v e r , t h e c o s t o f t u n n e l b o r i n g m a c h i n e s ( T B M ) r e q u i r e d t o c o n s t r u c t t h i s p r o j e c t h a s n o t b e e n r e d u c e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y . I n g e n e r a l , n o s i g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e s t o t h e s e v e n f e a s i b i l i t y i s s u e s c o n s i d e r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t h a v e o c c u r r e d o v e r t h e l a s t t w o y e a r s . C o n c l u s i o n A n a s s e s s m e n t o f c u r r e n t e c o n o m i c c o n d i t i o n s , l a c k o f s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f u n d i n g ; a n d t h e h i g h c o n s t r u c t i o n c o s t i s h a m p e r i n g t h e a b i l i t y o f O C T A a n d R C T C t o i m p l e m e n t t h i s p r o j e c t . U n t i l c o n s i d e r a b l e a d v a n c e m e n t s a r e m a d e i n r e g a r d s t o e f f i c i e n t a n d a f f o r d a b l e t u n n e l i n g t e c h n o l o g y , a n d m o r e s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l f u n d i n g a r e m a d e a v a i l a b l e , t h e p r o j e c t w i l l b e a c h a l l e n g e t o c o n s t r u c t . 9 1 E X P R E S S L A N E S E X C E S S T O L L R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y T h e e x c e s s t o l l r e v e n u e s f o r e c a s t f o r t h e 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s i n O r a n g e C o u n t y c o n s i s t s o f g r o s s r e v e n u e s m i n u s d e b t s e r v i c e , c a p i t a l , o p e r a t i n g , a n d m a i n t e n a n c e c o s t s . T h e e x c e s s t o l l r e v e n u e s w o u l d p r o v i d e f u n d i n g o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r v a r i o u s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s w i t h i n t h e S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r i n O r a n g e C o u n t y , 2 0 1 3 S R - 9 1 I M P L E M E N T A T I O N P L A N 1 6 ` 5 including the projects in Section 2. The use of excess toll revenues is subject to provisions of SB1316. These provisions include: enhancing transit service designed to reduce traffic congestion on SR-91 and enhancing travel options along the SR-91 corridor. Eligible expenditures include, but are not limited to, transit operating assistance, the acquisition of transit vehicles, improvements to commuter rail traveling between Riverside and Orange Counties, and those transit capital improvements otherwise eligible to be funded under the State Transportation Improvement Program. Operational or capacity improvements designed to reduce congestion or improve the flow of traffic on SR-91 are also eligible. 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Excess toll revenues may be used on any phase of project delivery to make capital improvements to on -ramps, connector roads, roadways, bridges, or other structures 41) that are related to the tolled and nontolled facilities on SR- 91 between SR-57 to the west and the Orange and Riverside County line to the east. The use of these funds will be subject to the approval of the OCTA Board of Directors for improvements in Orange County. Once RCTC's operation of the 91 Express Lanes in Riverside County has matured, use of any excess toll revenues for the 91 Express Lanes in Riverside County would be subject to the approval of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) Board of Directors. 166 " " S E C T I O N 2 : I M P L E M E N T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W T h e 2 0 1 3 P l a n d e s c r i b e s p r o j e c t s , i m p l e m e n t a t i o n s c h e d u l e s , k e y c o n s i d e r a t i o n , b e n e f i t s , a n d c o s t s ( i n 2 0 1 3 d o l l a r s , o r a s n o t e d ) f o r m a j o r p r o j e c t s t h r o u g h P o s t - 2 0 3 5 . M o s t o f t h e p r o j e c t s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h i s I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n a r e b a s e d o n t h e M I S t h a t w a s c o m p l e t e d i n J a n u a r y 2 0 0 6 . T h e p r o j e c t s a r e p r e s e n t e d b a s e d o n p o t e n t i a l i m p l e m e n t a t i o n s c h e d u l e s a n d p r i o r i t i e s e s t a b l i s h e d i n t h e M I S . T h e s c h e d u l e s f o r i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e p a c k a g e s o f p r o j e c t s i n c l u d e 2 0 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 , 2 0 3 5 , a n d P o s t - 2 0 3 5 . T h e 2 0 1 5 p r o j e c t s a r e c a p a b l e o f b e i n g i m p l e m e n t e d t h r o u g h t h e p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t p r o c e s s w i t h m i n i m a l t o m o d e r a t e e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n s t r a i n t s . S o m e o f t h e l o n g e r - r a n g e p r o j e c t s f o r 2 0 2 5 , 2 0 3 5 , a n d P o s t - 2 0 3 5 r e q u i r e m o r e s i g n i f i c a n t p l a n n i n g a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l a s s e s s m e n t p r i o r t o d e s i g n . E a c h o f t h e p r o j e c t i m p r o v e m e n t s i n c l u d e s a n e s t i m a t e o f p r o j e c t s c h e d u l e s . I t i s i m p o r t a n t t o n o t e t h a t i m p l e m e n t i n g v a r i o u s t i m e s a v i n g m e a s u r e s , s u c h a s d e s i g n - b u i l d o r c o n t r a c t o r i n c e n t i v e s f o r e a r l y c o m p l e t i o n , m a y p o t e n t i a l l y r e d u c e p r o j e c t s c h e d u l e s . T h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n p h a s e s a r e d e f i n e d a s f o l l o w s : V' C o n c e p t u a l E n g i n e e r i n g = P r e - P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t ( P r e - P S R ) C o n c e p t u a l p l a n n i n g a n d e n g i n e e r i n g f o r p r o j e c t s c o p i n g a n d f e a s i b i l i t y p r i o r t o i n i t i a t i n g t h e P S R p h a s e . V' P r e l i m i n a r y E n g i n e e r i n g = P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t ( P S R ) C o n c e p t u a l p l a n n i n g a n d e n g i n e e r i n g p h a s e t h a t a l l o w s f o r p r o g r a m m i n g o f f u n d s . " : " E n v i r o n m e n t a l = P r o j e c t R e p o r t / E n v i r o n m e n t a l D o c u m e n t a t i o n ( P R I E D ) T h e d e t a i l e d c o n c e p t d e s i g n t h a t p r o v i d e s e n v i r o n m e n t a l c l e a r a n c e f o r t h e p r o j e c t a n d p r o g r a m s f o r f i n a l d e s i g n a n d r i g h t o f w a y a c q u i s i t i o n . T h e d u r a t i o n f o r t h i s p h a s e i s t y p i c a l l y 2 - 3 y e a r s . V' D e s i g n = P l a n s , S p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d E s t i m a t e s ( P S & E ) P r o v i d e d e t a i l e d d e s i g n t o c o n t r a c t o r s f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n b i d d i n g a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n . V' C o n s t r u c t i o n = T h e p r o j e c t h a s c o m p l e t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d w i l l p r o v i d e c o n g e s t i o n r e l i e f t o m o t o r i s t s . T h e i n t e n t o f t h e s e I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n p r o j e c t p a c k a g e s i s t o p r o v i d e a n a c t i o n l i s t f o r O C T A , R C T C a n d C a l t r a n s ` t o p u r s u e i n t h e p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t p r o c e s s o r f o r i n i t i a t i n g f u r t h e r s t u d i e s . F i g u r e 2 - 1 S R - 9 1 P r o j e c t S t u d y A r e a f r o m S R - 5 7 t o I - 1 5 2 0 1 3 S R - 9 1 I M P L E M E N T A T I O N P L A N 1 6 7 BY YEAR 20 1 5 The first set of projects will be completed by 2015 and includes two (2) improvements at a total cost of approximately $111.2 4110 million (in 2013 dollars, or as noted). The two projects include the Metrolink short-term expansion plan and the SR-91 WB lane at Tustin Avenue. Further details for each of the projects are included following the summary below. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan (2014) 2 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue (2015) 66 45.2 SUBTOTAL 111.2 Figure 2-2 - Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2015 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan • Project No: 1 Anticipated Completion: 2014 Project Cost Estimate* Stations $ 39,000,000 Equipment $ 27,000,000 Total OCTA Costs: $ 66,000,000 Project Schedule To be completed by 2014 'Costs from OCTA Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), plans a short-term expansion of train service from the Inland Empire to Orange County. Additional trains are planned on the Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line that currently runs between San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties as well as the "91 Line' that goes from the Inland Empire to Los Angeles via Orange County, paralleling SR-91. Currently, there are sixteen (16) daily trains that run on the IEOC Line and nine (9) trains running on the 91 Line for a total of 25 daily trains. The short-term expansion adds two (2) additional IEOC trains and four (4) additional 91 Line trains by 2014 for a total of 31 daily trains, subject to negotiations with Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), RCTC, and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). The planned short-term expansion is necessary to accommodate population and employment growth in the region and will make the current service more convenient. Key Considerations Capital costs necessary for this expansion include the purchase of engines and coaches to operate the new service as well as a new station in the City of Placentia. OCTA costs are estimated at $66 million. The long-term plan (by 2030) adds more service and requires a significant capital investment. The City of Anaheim is also proposing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second track and platform to be implemented in 2015/2016 as part of the long-term plan. The City of Placentia is currently in the environmental phase for a new Metrolink commuter rail passenger station and parking lot to be constructed by 2016 as part of the long-term plan. Coordination has been livngoing with the Metrolink extension studies (see also Project #9 for long-term details). Benefits Enables development of expanded Metrolink Service and improves efficiency, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status SCRRA equipment procurement is complete with the Rotem Company for the purchase of trailer and cab cars, and also with MotivePower, Inc. for locomotives. Anticipated completion is 2014. DAILY TRAINS Year 2012_- 16 Year 2014: 20 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN DAILY TRAINS Year 2012: 25 Year 2014: 31 ✓ New train engines and wadies $66 million 169 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue Project No: 2 Anticipated Completion: 2015 Project Cost Estimate' Capital Cast Support Cost RfW Cast Total Project Cost. Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 23,100,000 $15,419,000 $ 6,71► ,000 $ 45,236,000 Completed Completed 2012-2013 2013-2015 " Schedule is derived from April 2012 OCTA;Capital Action Plan_ Costs are from 2012 Caltrans Estimate at Completion LEGEND Existing Highway n Interchange lump =MO Existing interchange HOV or HOT Lane E1725 Existing Lane Project Improvement Lane Project Description The project will add a westbound (WB) auxiliary lane on SR - through the Tustin Avenue interchange. Key Considerations Build Alternative ,3 was selected from the Project Study Report (PSR), On Westbound (WB) SR-91 Auxiliary Lane from the Northbound (NB) SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange, and requires additional right -of --way. City of Anaheim utilities are within close proximity of the proposed widening section_ Widening of time Santa Ana River bridge is required. Coordination with the City of Anaheim occurred for widening of Tustin Avenue and the WB SR-91 Off -Ramp that was completed in early 2011. Benefits The project would reduce or eliminate operational problems and deficiencies on this section of WB SR-91 including weaving and merging maneuvers. This project would also address choke -point conditions, which are caused primarily by extensive weaving between the. NB SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector and the WB SR-91 off -ramp to Tustin Avenue. Current Status Preliminary engineering was completed and approved by Caltrans. The environmental phase was completed in November2010, and desi is scheduled to be complete in mid-2013. The project received $14 from the Proposition 18 State -Local Partners Program (SLPP), $1-41v1from Measure NI, with the balance from Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. Tustin Av Lakeview Av 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 12 170 " B Y Y E A R 2 D 2 5 P r o j e c t s f o r i m p l e m e n t a t i o n b y 2 0 2 5 i n c l u d e t h e I n i t i a l P h a s e S R - 9 1 C o r r i d o r I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t ( C I P ) t h a t i n c l u d e s w i d e n i n g S R - 9 1 b y o n e g e n e r a l p u r p o s e ( G P ) l a n e i n e a c h d i r e c t i o n e a s t o f t h e C o u n t y L i n e , c o l l e c t o r - d i s t r i b u t o r ( C D ) r o a d s a n d d i r e c t s o u t h c o n n e c t o r s a t I - 1 5 / S R - 9 1 , e x t e n s i o n o f 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s t o 1 - 1 5 , a n d s y s t e m i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t s ; E x p r e s s B u s i m p r o v e m e n t s ; t h e i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t s a t S R - 7 1 1 S R - 9 1 ; t h e S R - 2 4 1 1 S R - 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s d i r e c t c o n n e c t o r ; a n d S R - 9 1 i m p r o v e m e n t s b e t w e e n S R - 5 7 a n d S R - 5 5 . O C T A , R C T C , a n d C a ! t r a n s h a v e i n i t i a t e d p r e l i m i n a r y p l a n n i n g a c t i v i t i e s f o r t h e s e p r o j e c t s t o e n s u r e r e a d i n e s s w h e n l o c a l , s t a t e , o r f e d e r a l f u n d i n g b e c o m e s a v a i l a b l e . C o n s e q u e n t l y , t h e r e m a y b e o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o a d v a n c e t h e s e p r o j e c t s i f a d d i t i o n a l f u n d i n g i s m a d e a v a i l a b l e . P r o j e c t s f o r i m p l e m e n t a t i o n b y 2 0 2 5 a r e e x p e c t e d t o c o s t a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 . 8 6 t o $ 2 . 0 5 b i l l i o n ( i n 2 0 1 3 d o l l a r s , o r a s n o t e d ) . S o m e o f t h e s e p r o j e c t s m a y b e c o m e c o m p o n e n t s o f 2 0 3 5 p r o j e c t s . P r o j e c t N o . 3 P r o j e c t S u m m a r y ( I m p l e m e n t a t i o n Y e a r ) I n i t i a l P h a s e C I P : W i d e n S R - 9 1 b y O n e G P L a n e i n E a c h D i r e c t i o n E a s t o f C o u n t y L i n e , C D R o a d s a n d I - 1 5 / S R - 9 1 D i r e c t S o u t h C o n n e c t o r , E x t e n s i o n o f E x p r e s s L a n e s t o 1 - 1 5 a n d S y s t e m / L o c a l I n t e r c h a n g e I m p r o v e m e n t s ( 2 0 1 7 ) C o s t ( $ M ) 1 , 3 4 5 4 E x p r e s s B u s I m p r o v e m e n t s B e t w e e n O r a n g e C o u n t y a n d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ( 2 0 1 7 ) 9 . 5 5 S R - 7 1 / S R - 9 1 I n t e r c h a n g e I m p r o v e m e n t s ( 2 0 1 8 ) 1 2 2 . 7 6 S R - 2 4 1 / S R - 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s C o n n e c t o r ( 2 0 1 8 ) 1 3 5 - 1 5 0 7 S R - 9 1 b e t w e e n S R - 5 7 a n d S R - 5 5 ( 2 0 2 5 ) 2 5 3 - 4 2 5 S U B T O T A L 1 , 8 6 5 2 , 0 5 2 F i g u r e 2 - 3 S u m m a r y o f P r o j e c t s f o r I m p l e m e n t a t i o n B y 2 0 2 5 2 0 1 3 S R - 9 1 I M P L E M E N T A T I O N P L A N 1 3 1 7 1 DO DO DO ed ed 17 ent • lanes at various locations, and the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (now part of Project #5) and at the.1-15/SR-91 interchal Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (ES/Vs/8)/1-15 (SBINB) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction fri to 1-15/Cajalco Road, and northerly to 1-15/Hidden Valley Parkway. An Express Lanes ingress/egress lane is also planned near the County Line. Due to current ecor was developed to allow an Initial Phase with reduced improvements to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed in ; deferred ultimate improvements (Project #10): SR-91/1-15 median North Direct Connector and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway; 1-15 Express Lai to Cajalco Road; general purpose lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street; and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the. SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within bi projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team.. Ad multiplealternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated wit #5) and. the SR-241/SR-91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #6), which includes three alternatives for further study that will need to be coordinated with the propose required with the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer line relocation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Santa Ana River bank -protection projects (Reacl Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate C1P projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street, along 1-15 from I to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north, Traffic operation will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roadsanc motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in Fall 2012. The Request for Proposals was released in July 2012 and selection of a Design -Build contractor and award May 2013. Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off Coal Canyon County Line Off WLC - "<- On 111PgressfEgress lanes shown within - Green River Rd on 44; Off On 7, ,j..."..„„,..1.0.04.0 • 19M11111111511N Off Auto Center Dr Maple St Lincoln Av Main On* Oft' off On Off On On Off' Off Serfas Club Dr On Off On Off Off 3-4111 CD Road ring -mart -no- frrirri Main Qf " E x p r e s s B u s I m p r o v e m e n t s B e t w e e n O r a n g e C o u n t y a n d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y P r o j e c t N o : 4 A n t i c i p a t e d C o m p l e t i o n : 2 0 1 7 P r o j e c t C o s t E s t i m a t e ' T o t a l C a p i t a l C o s t $ 9 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 T o t a l A n n u a l O p e r a t i n g C o s t $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 P r o j e c t S c h e d u l e R i v e r s i d e / C o r o n a t o L a S i e r r a M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n t o I r v i n e B u s i n e s s C o m p l e x / U C I i n F Y 2 0 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 R i v e r s i d e / C o r o n a t o N o r t h E a s t A n a h e i m a n d C S U F i n F Y 2 0 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 R i v e r s i d e / C o r o n a t o A n a h e i m R e s o r t i n F Y 2 0 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 V i l l a g e a t O r a n g e t o R i v e r s i d e / C o r o n a e x i s t i n g ( R T A 2 1 6 ) R i v e r s i d e / C o r o n a t o S o u t h C o a s t M e t r o i m p l e m e n t e d F a l l 2 0 0 6 ( O C T A 7 9 4 ) " C o s t s f r o m O C T A ( 2 0 1 0 d o l l a r s P r o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( O C T A ) , w o r k i n g w i t h t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C ) , a n d t h e R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( R T A ) , p l a n s a n e x t e n s i v e e x p a n s i o n o f E x p r e s s B u s s e r v i c e b e t w e e n R i v e r s i d e a n d O r a n g e c o u n t i e s _ C o m m u t e r s l a c k d i r e c t t r a n s i t c o n n e c t i o n s t o m a n y O r a n g e C o u n t y e m p l o y m e n t c e n t e r s , a n d n e w E x p r e s s B u s s e r v i c e w i l l p r o v i d e c o n n e c t i o n s t o m a j o r e m p l o y m e n t c e n t e r s i n A n a h e i m , C o s t a M e s a , F u l l e r t o n , a n d I r v i n e . T h r e e n e w E x p r e s s B u s r o u t e s a r e p l a n n e d f r o m R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t o t h e A n a h e i m C a n y o n B u s i n e s s C e n t e r a n d C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y F u l l e r t o n , A n a h e i m C i v i c C e n t e r , W e s t e r n M e d i c a l C e n t e r , a n d A n a h e i m R e s o r t ; a n d I r v i n e B u s i n e s s C o m p l e x a n d U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a , I r v i n e ( U C I ) _ R o u t e s w o u l d r u n e v e r y 3 0 t o 4 5 m i n u t e s i n t h e p e a k p e r i o d , a n d s e r v i c e w i l l b e t a i l o r e d t o m a t c h d e m a n d . I m p l e m e n t a t i o n b e g a n i n F a l l 2 0 0 6 w i t h t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t o H u t t o n C e n t r e a n d S o u t h C o a s t M e t r o r o u t e . T h e o t h e r r o u t e s a r e p l a n n e d f o r i m p l e m e n t a t i o n b y F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 c o n t i n g e n t o n f u t u r e b u d g e t a u t h o r i t y . U p o n c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e p r o p o s e d 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s , R C T C e x p e c t s t o n e a r l y d o u b l e E x p r e s s B u s s e r v i c e o n S R - 0 1 . C u r r e n t l y , R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( R T A ) a n d O C T A o p e r a t e 2 1 b u s t r i p s p e r d a y o n S R - 9 1 a n d R O T C e n v i s i o n s a g i n g 2 0 a d d i t i o n a l t r i p s , b r i n g i n g t h e t o t a l t o 4 1 d a i l y t r i p s . S e r v i c e d u r a t i o n f o r t h i s e x p a n s i o n w i l l i n c r e a s e b y 1 1 , 5 0 0 h o u r s p e r y e a r a n d w i l l b e s e r v e d b y f i v e n e w t r a n s i t c o a c h e s t o b e p r o c u r e d s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r t h i s s e r v i c e _ K e y C o n s i d e r a t i o n s O p e r a t i n g c o s t s a r e e s t i m a t e d a t $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 e a c h y e a r . C o s t s a r e s h a r e d b y O r a n g e a n d R i v e r s i d e c o u n t i e s . B e n e f i t s D e v e l o p m e n t o f E x p r e s s B u s s e r v i c e s w i l l c o n t r i b u t e t o c o n g e s t i o n r e l i e f o n S R - 9 1 . C u r r e n t S t a t u s A c o o p e r a t i v e a g r e e m e n t c o v e r i n g t h e R i v e r s i d e / C o r o n a t o S o u t h C o a s t M e t r o s e r v i c e w i t h R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y h a s b e e n d e v e l o p e d _ T h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t o S o u t h C o a s t M e t r o E x p r e s s B u s r o u t e i s c u r r e n t l y o p e r a t i n g . E x p a n s i o n o f t h e p r o g r a m i s d e p e n d e n t u p o n a v a i l a b l e o p e r a t i n g f u n d s a n d f u t u r e f i n a n c i a l c o m m i t m e n t s w i t h R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . T h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n d a t e s m a y c h a n g e b a s e d o n f u n d i n g a v a i l a b i l i t y . 2 0 1 3 S R - 9 1 I M P L E M E N T A T I O N P L A N 1 5 1 7 3 Key Considerations Project improvements must be coordinated with the following projects: the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (CIP) (Project #3 and #10) and the SR-241 iSR-91 The Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement was completed in March 2009 (see Appendix Project No. A) and consisted of replacing the previously existing Gre six -lane wide, 4-span oyercrossing to accommodate widening of SR-91 by Projects #3, #6, and #10. The SR-91 CIP (Project #3 and #10) project has selecteda de! Spring 2013 and construction is scheduled to begin in early 2014. A Project Study Report for the SR-241/SR-91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #6) was initiated being evaluated. Close coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish and Game will also be required os the connector Prado Dam. In addition, implementation of Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Project #11) within the median of SR-91 will require the need for a three -level CM! direct flyover connector. Coordination will be required with an at -grade or grade -separated managed lane ingress/egress facility that may be located near the Coui (Project #3 and #10). Benefits The project will provide a new direct connector improvement from EB SR-91 to NB SR-71, replacing the geometric choke point created by the existing conned operations and operational efficiency by eliminating or minimizing weaving conflicts through the use of auxiliary lanes. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in June 2011, Final design is undenvay and is anticipated to be complete in mid-2014. ingress/Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes by restriping by Project #3 Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off 0 • ._. Off oe"' Coal Canyon County Line WLC - -4- - Lane shown is for Project #3 OW.) Green River Rd On Off_ " 40.4111114111111,11111 '-'"'"P"'"4111411111111" rims Lanes shown are for R-71/SR-91 interchange east to north flyo connector for SR-71, and 71 7t3e, Off Off Auto Ce Off Serfas C SR-91 On -Rai shown is for Gri SR-2411SR-91 Express Lanes Connector Project No: 6 • Anticipated Completion: 2018 Project Cost Estimate Range` Total Project Cost, Low $ 135,000,000 Total Project Cost, High $ 150,000,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental 2012-2015 Design/Construction 2015-2018 Range assumes a 2-lane connector, extending as far as Coal Canyon. Costs from TCA Project Fact Sheet (2011 dollars) Benefits Project Description . The SR-241/SR-91 Express Lanes connector will carry northbound (NB) SR-241 traffic to eastbound (EB) SR-91 Express Lanes and carry westbound (WB) SR-91 Express Lanes traffic to southbound (SB) SR-241. Outside widening would be required mainly on the south side of SR-91 for realignment of EB lanes up to the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing. Key Considerations This project was originally permitted as a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) connector into the SR-91 HOV lane. With the implementation of the 91 Express Lanes, the project will need to carefully coordinate the traffic operations and tolling practices that will result with the convergence of the SR-241 toll road, the existing OCTA 91 Express Lanes, and the proposed extension of the 91 Express Lanes. The project will follow the SR-91 CIP (Project #3) in its implementation and will need to be designed accordingly. Continuous operations of the 91 Express Lanes will be a key consideration to this project. Corridor A (Project #11) will also need to be planned with this project in mind. The preliminary analysis calls for the SR-91 center median to be widened to the south to make room for a two lane (one in each direction) direct connector. The project would tie into the SR-91 GIP improvements at Coal Canyon. The project will close the current toll system gap between the future and existing 91 Express Lanes and the SR-241 Eastern Transportation Corridor System. The project improves access to SR-241 and South County for traffic that does not currently utilize the 91 Express Lanes, which also improves WB SR-91 by eliminating the need for HOV and Express Lane users to weave across four general purpose lanes to use the existing SR-241 connector. It helps to alleviate congestion on NB SR-241 and EB SR-91 by allowing SR-241 users to bypass the existing EB SR-91 general purpose connector. The project may also provide a benefit to the Central County MIS area. Current Status erreliminary engineering concepts for a SR-241/SR-91 direct connector have been developed by Foothill/Eastern ransportation Corridor Agency (TCA) and Caltrans. The 91 Express Lanes Extension and SR-241 Connector Feasibility Study was completed in March 2009 and was initiated to evaluate the various alternatives. An expanded alternative would connect to SR-71 or extend the ingress/egress further east. A Project Study Report was initiated in January 2011 and was completed by January 2012. The Project Report and Environmental Document is anticipated to be competed by mid-2015. On Gypsum CanyonOff On On Coal Canyon WLC County Line Ingress/Egress lanes shown within Express Lanes by restriping (Project #3) 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN °WWs Existing Highway InterchangerRamp County Line „ =2= HOV or HOT Lane Existing Lane Project Improvement Lane, tam Project #3 17 175 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 Project No: 7 Anticipated Completion: 2025 Project Cost Estimate Capital Cost TED R/W Cost TED Support Cost TED Management & Contingency TED Total Project Cost, Low* $253,000,000 Total Project Cost, High* $425,000,000 Project Schedule: Conceptual Engineering Completed Preliminary Engineering 2011-2013 Environmental 2013-2016 Design 2018-2021 Construction 2021-2025 *Project costs from the SR-91 Feasibil4 Study from SR-55 to SR-57 (2009 dollars) LEGEND Existing Highway alma interchange/Ramp maws Existing Interchange HOV OT HOT Lane Existing Lane ME Project improvement Lane aim Existing Lanes Outline L "I Project 42 lingravernerits State College Blvd On Off SR-57 0 Project Description Improve the SR-57/SR-91 interchange complex, including nearby local interchanges, as well as adding freeway capacity between SR-55 and SR-57. A ne+,v connector from westbound (WB) SR-91 to southbound (S SR-55 may be constructed. Various other improvements are also planned as shown below. Improvements also extend to State College Blvd to the west and include improvements to the Lakeview Ave interchange to the east_ Specific improvements will be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. The improvements shown are from the concepts developed by the SR-91 Project Study Report - Project Development Support from SR-57 to SR-55. Some of the improvements shown may not be constructed as part of the project. Key Considerations The proposed project improvements on VV13 and eastbound (EB) SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 may require right-of-way acquisition. Coordination with the SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue improvements (Project #2) will be required. Benefits The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 include, among other features, adding one EB general purpose lane to achieve lane balancing_ The project improvement will alleviate congestion and reduce delay. The SR-57/SR-91 interchange improvements are expected to provide congestion relief for SR-91 traffic. Current Status The project improvement for EB SR-91 widening and for improvements t411 SR-57/SR-91 and SR-55/SR-91 were studied by the Feasibility Study, which was completed in June 2009. Preliminary engineering began in August 2011 and will be completed by early 2013. The proposed improvements are included in the Measure M2 program. Lane shown is for Project #2 Kraemer Blvd On Off Tustin Av „ 1,11111P" Off Off Ort Glasse!! St EB SR-91 at Kraemer Blvd interchange improvements Lakeview Av to WB SR-91 improvements Off On WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 improvements 55 er,74 r7i On Lakeview Av ,••• 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 18 1 76 BY YEAR 2035 • Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer -lead time projects and include: a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; a significant expansion of Metrolink service and station improvements; and the Ultimate CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 8 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements (Post-2025) 76.8 9 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements (2030) 335 10 Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct TBD North Connector, Extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 (2035) SUBTOTAL 412+ Figure 2-4 — Summary of Projects for Implementation by 2035 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 177 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements Project No: 8 Anticipated Completion: Post-2025 Project Cost Estimate • Capital Cost Support Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 67,800,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 76,800,00fl Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD 'Costs from Feasibility Study (2009 dollars)_ RNV cost is undetermined at this time. Cost does not include potential impact to Santa Ana River. LEGEND Existing Highway Eno Proposed Interchange/Ramp Mina Exisfing Interchange Matt KW or HOT Lane !LIT: Existing Lane 11111M Proposed Improvement Lanes Project Description The project would provide a new interchange with SR-91 at Fairmont Boulevard. On- and off -ramps will connect Fairmont Boulevard t eastbound (EB) and westbound (WB) SR-91_ The proposed interchange does not include a Fairmont Boulevard connection to Santa Ana Canyon Road to the south_ Key Considerations Interchange spacing and weaving issues (to SR-55) need to be evaluated_ Widening of SR-91 may be needed to accommodate interchange ramps_ Proximity of the Santa Ana River may require that the WB ramp junction be located north of the river. New connection requirements and interchange spacing needs to be considered_ Benefits The interchange is expected to relieve congestion at Imperial Highway (SR-90), Lakeview Avenue, and Weir Canyon Road Interchanges_ Preliminary traffic modeling shows a 10-15% decrease in volumes at Weir Canyon and SR-90 interchanges with the interchange alternative. Current Status The City of Anaheim completed a conceptual engineering study in December 2009_ Multiple alternatives have been developed as part of the conceptual engineering study_ Project development is pending funding identification_ Fairmont Blvd On Off Off ':=4104Pattrogwo,::. 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 20 178 Metrolink Service and Station improvements Project No: 9 Anticipated Completion: 2030 Project Cost Estimate' Total Capital Cost $ 335,000,000 Project Schedule To be completed by 2030 "Costs from OCTA Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), plans an extensive expansion of train service from the Inland Empire to Orange County. Additional trains are planned on the Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line that currently runs between San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties as well as the 91 Line that goes from the Inland Empire to Los Angeles via Orange County, paralleling SR-91. Currently, sixteen (16) trains a day non on the IE0C Line and nine (9) trains on the 91 Line_ The long-term expansion plan builds on service levels that will be implemented by 2014 (Project #1)_ The "2014" plan includes two (2) additional IEOC trains and four (4) additional 91 Line trains for a total of 31 trains a day. The (ring -term plan adds another eight (8) IEOC trains and twenty (20) 91 Line trains for a total of 59 daily trains. This planned expansion is necessary to accommodate population and employment growth in the region and will make the current service more convenient_ Capital improvements necessary for this expansion include a third track on sections of the rail line in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties; new crossovers at critical locations to allow trains to pass one another, new storage tracks in San Bernardino; parking improvements at key stations; and purchase of engines and coaches to operate the new service: The City of Anahekn is proposing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second track and platform to be implemented in 2015/2016 The City of Placentia, in partnership with OCTA, is proposing to construct a new Metrolink commuter rail passenger station and parking lot within the city limits by 2016_ Key Considerations The capital program is estimated to cost $335 million, and costs would be shared by the member agencies of SCRRA and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)_ Service levels are subject to negotiation with BNSF, RCTC, and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). erne -its ables development of new Metrolink Services, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The proposed implementation of this project is tieing evaluated teased on the current economic climate. Trains to Las Antes , wa,Ftherfon DAILY TRAINS Year 2014: 20 Year 2030: 20 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN DAILY TRAINS Year 2014. 3 Ye,ar 2030. 59 i td ,ertri ✓ New fra k and crossovers ✓ Expanded station parking ✓ New train engines and coaches $335 million 21 179 Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following, in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of tl line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EB/WB)/I-15 (SB/NB) Express Lanes, median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direct to I-15/Cajalco Road, and northerly to I-15/Hidden Valley Parkway. Due to current economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed in 2035. The following is a summary of the propos€ North Direct Connector and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway; 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalca Road; ger and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR.-71.. These Ultimate improvements are the subject of this project.. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and witl projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project tear multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints_ Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be cool SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #5), and the SR-2411SR-91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #8), which includes alternatives for further .study that will neei Continued coordination will be required with the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer line relocation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers riverbank pr Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street and along and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operation will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts, along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roa motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete. The Ultimate Project is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012 isting bike path will be preserved Off Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off frsr iihsb Coal Canyon County Line Green River Rd WLC On Off Ultimate project widens all SR-91 lanes to full standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71 Auto Center Dr Maple St Linco On* Off* off On Off On - Off Off* Serfas Club Dr .).47 s,Asa,111k-zr467,- - Lane shown is for Green River Off n Av Off On f On Off 3-Lane CD Road from BY POST-2035 Projects for implementation by Post-2035 focus on longer -lead time projects. This multi -billion dollar program includes: an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15; the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail; and the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B). The multi -billion dollar potential projects include significant environmental constraints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. The Corridor A project may incorporate projects being developed in the earlier programs as project components. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 11 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 (Post-2035) 2,720 12 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail (Post-2035) 2,770-3,200 13 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (Post-2035) 8,855 SUBTOTAL 14,350-14,780 Figure 2-5 — Summary of Projects for Implementation by Post-2035 2013 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 181 23 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 Project No: 11 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Project Cost Estimate — Capital Cost* $ 1,488,000,000 Support Cost (25%) $ 372,000,000 RNV Cost $ 860,000,000 Total Project Cost $ 2,720,000,000 Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 'Capital costs include $160M for environmental mitigation excluding corresponding support cost, which is included in support cost estimate "Costs derived from Riverside County - Orange County MIS, January 2006 (2005 dollars) 2 WB Lanes Abbreviations: WB r- Westbound EB = Eastbound Project Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a new 4-laneD elevated expressway near or within the Santa Ana Canyon with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241 and 1-15. The facility may include managed lanes and potential reversible operations. Key Considerations Choice of alignment will be key to determining net capacity increase. Extensive right-of-way (RNV) will be required to implement the improvements if the alignment is not on the SR-91 corridor. If Project #3 or #10 is constructed and a 4-lane elevated facility is proposed within the median of SR-91 through Corona, then extensive managed lane closures would be required during construction (thus temporarily reducing SR-91 capacity during construction). Potential considerations for co -locating the Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) train (see Project #12) adjacent to Corridor A (and also SR-91) include providing a two -column structure with a barrier between the trains and vehicles. Concepts for Corridor A and Maglev within the SR-91 median could jeopardize future opportunities for managed lanes within the SR-91 median, such as the extension of 91 Express Lanes. An alternative could be studied for the median Corridor A viaduct along with reduced SR-91 geometric standards to minimize R/W impacts. Also, direct connectors (such as for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) High Occupancy Toll (HOT) at I-15/SR-91) to/from the median could be precluded by Maglev colurnns located within the same median area. Caltrans and Maglev highway RAN, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with • a Maglev facility were pursued_ Additional mitigation costs may be required for improvements to SR-241 and SR-133 as a result of additional Corridor traffic volumes. Corridor A as managed lanes, with potential extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15 (Project #3 and #10), may affect traffic distribution due to "parallel" tolled facilities. 2 EB Lanes Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Conidor A) Cross -Section Benefits The project would provide significant congestion relief by allowing vehicles to bypass the at -grade freeway lanes and local arterial interchanges between SR-24 1 and 1-1 5. Connections are proposed directly between SR-91, SR-241, and 1-15. Current Status This project is identified in the Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MS) as part of the Locally Preferred Strategy to improve mobility between Riverside County and Orange County_ No project development work is planned at this time. • 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan 24 182 Anaheim to Ontatio International Airport Miaglev High Speed Rail Project No: 12 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Project Cost Estimate Total Project Cost, Low $2,770,000,000 Total Project Cost, High $3,200,000,000 Project Schedule To Be Determined Project costs from American Magline Group (2012 dollars) LEGEND Imo Existing Highway High Speed Rail Representative Alignment Project Description Proposals for a new super -speed train corridor from Anaheim to Ontario are included in this project. This project includes an alternative that would use SR-91 right-of-way, or would be aligned adjacent to SR-91 right-of-way, or could potentially be co -located with the Major investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Project #11) alignment. Another alignment opportunity is being investigated along SR-57. Key Considerations Alternative alignment impacts to SR-91 right-of-way envelope and/or Santa Ana River are undetermined. The choice of alignment will potentially impact MIS Corridor A (Project #11). Right-of-way (R/W) will be required to implement the improvements. Potential considerations for co -locating the Magnetic Levitation (maglev) train adjacent to Corridor A (and also SR-91) include providing a two -column structure with a barrier between the trains and vehicles. Ca'trans and maglev highway RNV, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with a maglev facility were pursued. See the MIS Corridor A (Project #11) for additional considerations. Coordination with Metrolink improvements (Project #9) will be required. Benefits The project would provide congestion relief by providing a direct high-speed/high-capacity connection with Ontario International Airport for Orange County air passengers and business next -day deliveries. Maglev will make the trip in just 14_5 minutes. Relieves congestion on SR-91 by providing additional capacity in the corridor_ •Current Status Preliminary design, engineering and Phases 1 and 2 of a Preliminary Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS/EIS) are completed. Congress has approved $45M in SAFETEA-LU for the envircinmental phase of the project. The Anaheim to Ontario segment is included in the "Constrained' Plan of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) passed in April 2012. Construction funding of up to $7 billion has been identified through a loan commitment from the China Export -Import Bank. • REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SNC7V N FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan 183 : 25 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-2411SR-133 to I-15lCajalco Road Project No: 13 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Project Cost Estimate' Capital Cost $ 7,675,000,000 Support Cost (25eY0) S 880,000,000 RtW Cost $ 300,000,000 Total Project Cast $ 8,855,000,000 Project Schedule Geotechnical Feasibility Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD 'Costs derived from the Feasibility Evaluation Report (2009 dollars) LEGEND. was Existing Highway ICE (Corridor B) Representative Alignment NOTE: REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY Project Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a highway and rail facility through the Cleveland National Forest with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241lSR-133 and 1-151Cajalco Road. The facility would essentially be a continuation of SR-133 on the west end of the corridor, to 1-15 on the east end. :Key Considerations The tunnel project is technically feasible based on the geotechnical investigation completed in December 2009_ The initial project phase would be the construction of one 2-lane highway tunnel and one rail tunnel_ The second project phase would include construction of a second 2-lane highway tunnel. Additional technical studies and geotechnical borings would be needed to refine the tunnel alignments and grades_ Costs associated with the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) tunnels are based on the Feasibility Evaluation Report completed in December 2009_ A financial analysis will be needed for the construction, operations and toll requirements of the ICE tunnels. Benefits The project would provide significant congestion refief by providing an alternative route between Orange and Riverside counties and would allow vehicles to bypass SR-91 between SR-241 and I-15. The project would not disrupt SR-91 traffic during construction and would allow for additional route selection for incident management, emergency evacuation, and for continuity of the highway network by linking SR-133 to 1-15_ Current Status On August 27, 2010 the Riverside grange Corridor .Authority Board took action to defer additional study of the ICE project until such time as financial considerations improve andfor technological advancements warrant reexamination. Review of the project shall be done annually through the SR-91 Implementation Plan update to determine if any of the major assumptions with regard to financial considerations, private sector interest, or technological advancements have changed to make the tunnel financially viable_ (See 'ICE status summary' for further discussion). 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan 184 26. " S E C T I O N 3 : C O M P L E T E D P R O J E C T E X H I B I T S T h e f o l l o w i n g e x h i b i t s r e p r e s e n t c o m p l e t e d p r o j e c t s f r o m p r e v i o u s P l a n s s i n c e 2 0 0 6 , a n d a r e i n t e n d e d t o b e u s e d a s a r e f e r e n c e t o i l l u s t r a t e t h e p r o g r e s s m a d e s i n c e t h e i n c e p t i o n o f t h e P l a n . N o t e : s o m e p r o j e c t s l i s t e d i n t h e P l a n a s c o m p l e t e d ( s e e S e c t i o n 1 , P r o j e c t A c c o m p l i s h m e n t s ) a r e n o t i n c l u d e d h e r e i n s i n c e t h e r e w a s n o e x h i b i t c r e a t e d f o r u s e w i t h p r i o r P l a n s ( s u c h a s f o r r e s t r i p i n g p r o j e c t s , v a r i o u s s a f e t y e n h a n c e m e n t s , m i n o r o p e r a t i o n a l i m p r o v e m e n t s , e t c . ) . A p p e n d i x ' P r o j e c t N o . P r o j e c t I m p r o v e m e n t s G r e e n R i v e r R o a d O v e r c r o s s i n g R e p l a c e m e n t M a r c h 2 0 0 9 B N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t C o r o n a M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n P a r k i n g S t r u c t u r e J u n e 2 0 0 9 C E a s t b o u n d L a n e A d d i t i o n f r o m S R - 2 4 1 t o S R - 7 1 S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 0 D W i d e n S R - 9 1 b e t w e e n S R - 5 5 a n d S R - 2 4 1 b y A d d i n g a 5 t h G P L a n e i n E a c h D i r e c t i o n D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 S R - 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n 2 7 1 8 5 Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement Appendix Project No: A Actual Completion: March 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 21,000,000 Support Cost $ 3,000,000 RAN Cost $301,000 Total Project Cost $ 24,301,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed Project Schedule Caltrans Equivalents: Preliminary Engineering = PID Environmental = PA/ED Design = PS&E Abbreviations: CD = Collector Distributor Lane FTR = Future HOV = High Occupancy ?vehicle r. SHLD = Shoulder Project Description Improvements primarily consist of replacing the existing Green River Road overcrossing with a new silt -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate futtire widening of SR-91 _ The interior spans will accommodate ip.to eight mainline lanes in each direction including two HOV lanes. The, xterior spans can accommodate two lanes, either for„auxrliarylanes or collector distributor roads_ Entrance tand gift ramps will be realigned and widened to accommodate the new bridge, yet the interchange will retain its current colguration N signals will be installed at the ramp intersectionS.AampAnd bridge improvements will be constructed with existing right of way Key ConsideAtio Designs terface is refired with the Eastbound Lane Addition from SR 241,,,to SR-74, SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements, `l SR- , prritiiril vement Project, and SR-241/SR-91 i5V/HcFr Corineetor sect will improve the level of service at ramp and local et intersections at the interchange_ Improvements will reduce p queues that extend into the freeway's general purpose lanes, thus contributing to congestion relief on SR-91 _ Current Status The project began construction in March 2007 and was completed in March 2009. GREEN RIVER BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION NOTE: All dimensions are approximate 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan 186 28 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure Appendix Project No: B Actual Completion: June 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 20,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $0 $ 25,000,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed, Project Description The project provides a six level parking structure with 1,065 parking stalls_ The construction is within the`'existing North Main Street Metrolink station property in .Corona, Key Considerations Proposed improvements were constructed within existing right of way. Currently there are 700 users of the facility, 200 more that were previously able to accomodate. Additionally RCTC has opened up the lot to park and ride carpools and vanpools and has issued over 120 permits for carpoolers to use the expanded station. This shows an added benefit of supporting carpooling as well as transit to offset congestion on SR-91. fits and4or parking currently exceeds the capacity at the North Main Streit Corona station. New parking capacity will allow Metrolink r. _lac ease thereby diverting vehicle trips from SR-91. ant Status Construction was initiated in January 2008 and was completed in June 2009. The project was funded with Federal Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds, 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan 187 29 " " E a s t b o u n d L a n e A d d i t i o n f r S R - 2 4 1 t o S R - 7 1 A p p e n d i x P r o j e c t N o : A c t u a l C o m p l e t i o n : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 0 P r o j e c t C o s t E s t i m a t e C a p i t a l C o s t S u p p o r t C o s t R / W C o s t T o t a l P r o j e c t C o s t P r o j e c t S c h e d u l e P r e l i m i n a r y E n g i n e e r i n g E n v i r o n m e n t a l D e s i g n C o n s t r u c t i o n L E G E N D E x i s t i n g H i g h w a y c r e z . I n t e r c h a n g e d R a r n p a n o n C c u n t y L i n e W A N H O V o r H O T L a n e E x i s t i n g L a n e P r o j e c t i m p r o v e m e n t L a n e I n i s i e w ' E x i s t i n g t h t e r c h a n g e $ 4 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 1 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 C a n - G y p s u m C a . n y o n R d . O n O f f C o m p l e t e d C o m p l e t e d C o m p l e t e d C o m p l e t e d P r o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n T h e p r o j e c t w i l l p r o v i d e a n a d d i t i o n a l e a s t b o u n d ( E B ) l a n e f r o m t h e S R - 9 1 / S R - 2 4 1 i n t e r c h a n g e t e a . t h e S R - 7 1 / S R 9 1 i n t e r c h a n g e a n d w i l l w i d e n a l l E B l a n e s a n d s h o u l d e r S t o s t a n d a r d w i d t h s . K e y C o n s i d e r a t i o n s C o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h t h e S R - 9 1 C o r r i d o r I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t s ( P r o j e c t # 4 a n d # 1 2 ) w i l l b e r e q U i r e d . S t a g e d c o n s t r u c t i o n w o u l d b e r e q u i r e d f o r a l l r a m p r e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d f r e e w a y w i d e n i n g F r e e w a y o p e r a t i o n s w o u l d m o s t l i k e l y b e ' a f f e c t e d b y t h i s p r o j e c t , h o w e v e r , f r e e w a y l a n e c l o s u r e s a r e n o t a n t i c i p a t e d . A n E B c o n c r e t e s h o u l d e r w i l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h , a 1 2 f o o t w i d t h t o p r o v i d e f o r f u t u r e w i d e n i n g a s c o n t e m p l a t e d b y P r o j e c t # 4 a n d # 1 2 . B e n e f i t s : T h e l a n e a d d i t i o n w o u l d h e l p t o a l l e v i a t e t h e w e a v i n g c o n d i t i o n b e t w e e n S R - 2 4 1 a n d S R - 7 1 , a s w e l l a s r e m o v e v e h i c l e s f r o m t h e S R - 9 1 m a i n l i n e t h a t w o u l d b e e x i t i n g a t G r e e n R i v e r R o a d a n d S R - 7 1 . C u r r e n t S t a t u s F u n d i n g i s f r o m t h e A m e r i c a n R e c o v e r y a n d R e i n v e s t m e n t A c t ( A R R A ) w i t h $ 7 1 . 4 4 1 v 1 a p p r o v e d , a n d t h e b a l a n c e o f p r o j e d c o s t s a r e f r o m o t h e r s o u r c e s _ C o n s t r u c t i o n b e g a n i n l a t e 2 0 4 9 a n d w a s c o m p l e t e d i n S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 0 . C o a l C a n y o n W L C C o u n t y L i n e G r e e n R i v e r R d o n O f f O n O f f 0 O f f O f f 2 0 1 3 S R - 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n 1 8 8 3 0 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction Appendix Project No: D Actual Completion: December 2012 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 65,005,000 $ 19,639,000 $ 573,000 $ 85,217.000 Completed Completed Completed Completed LEGEND .� Existing Highway maim 3nterchange3Ramp mem Existing interchange a +. xi Proposed Interchange HOV or HOT Existing LaneLane MINN Project Improvement Lane IMO Auxiliary Lane Off Project Description This project proposes capacity and operational improvements by adding one general purpose (GP) lane on eastbotnd,(EB) SR-91 from the SR-55/ SR-91 connector to east of the Weir Canyon Road interchange and on westbound (WB) SR-91 from just east of Weir Canyon Road interchange to the Imperial Highway {SR-90) interchange. Additionally, this project would facilitate truck traffic approaching the truck scales in both directions. Key Considerations Ca!trans is not considering relocation of the truck scales at this time_ Benefits Alleviates congestion on WB SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop at the truck scales and providing a continuous GP lane to SR-90. Alleviates congestion on EB SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop for northbound (NB) SR-55 at SR-91 by providing an auxiliary lane to Lakeview Avenue, and at SR-90 by providing a continuous GP lane through Weir Canyon Road. Current Status Construction was completed in December 2012. The project received $22M of Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) funding and $74M of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Augmentation funds. Fairmont Bl Truck Scrapes ff Weil Canyoffn Rd On Off On Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off Off On Off NOTE: FAIRMONT BLVD IS CONTINGENT UPON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT On Off 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan 31 189 " S E C T I O N 4 : R E F E R E N C E S T h e f o l l o w i n g d o c u m e n t s a n d r e s o u r c e s w e r e u s e d i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e 2 0 1 3 P l a n . D a t a w a s p r o v i d e d b y O C T A , R C T C , C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t s 8 a n d 1 2 , T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o r r i d o r A g e n c i e s ( T C A ) , a n d o t h e r a g e n c i e s . D r a f t P S R - P D S " O n S R - 9 1 B e t w e e n S R - 5 7 a n d S R - 5 5 " P S & E " O n S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 B e t w e e n t h e S R - 9 1 / S R - 5 5 I n t e r c h a n g e a n d t h e S R - 9 1 / S R - 2 4 1 I n t e r c h a n g e i n O r a n g e C o u n t y " ( A p r i l 2 0 1 1 ) C o r r i d o r S y s t e m M a n a g e m e n t P l a n ( C S M P ) O r a n g e C o u n t y S R - 9 1 C o r r i d o r F i n a l R e p o r t , A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t / P r o j e c t R e p o r t " R i g h t o f W a y R e l i n q u i s h m e n t o n W e s t b o u n d S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 B e t w e e n W e i r C a n y o n R o a d a n d C o a l C a n y o n " , M a y 2 0 1 0 S R - 9 1 / F a i r m o n t B o u l e v a r d F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y , D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 9 S R - 9 1 F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y f r o m S R - 5 7 t o S R - 5 5 , D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 9 F e a s i b i l i t y E v a l u a t i o n R e p o r t f o r I r v i n e - C o r o n a E x p r e s s w a y T u n n e l s , D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 9 R e n e w e d M e a s u r e M S t r a t e g i c P l a n , J u n e 2 0 0 9 P l a n s , S p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d E s t i m a t e s ( P S & E ) f o r E a s t b o u n d S R - 9 1 l a n e a d d i t i o n f r o m S R - 2 4 1 t o S R - 7 1 , M a y 2 0 0 9 P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t " O n S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 B e t w e e n t h e S R - 9 1 / S R - 5 5 I n t e r c h a n g e a n d t h e S R - 9 1 / S R - 2 4 1 I n t e r c h a n g e i n O r a n g e C o u n t y " , A p r i l 2 0 0 9 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s E x t e n s i o n a n d S t a t e R o u t e 2 4 1 C o n n e c t o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y , M a r c h 2 0 0 9 P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t / P r o j e c t R e p o r t " O n G y p s u m C a n y o n R o a d B e t w e e n t h e G y p s u m C a n y o n R o a d / S R - 9 1 W e s t b o u n d O f f - R a m p ( P M 1 6 . 4 ) a n d t h e G y p s u m C a n y o n R o a d / S R - 9 1 E a s t b o u n d D i r e c t O n - R a m p ( P M 1 6 . 4 ) " , J u n e 2 0 0 8 C a l i f o r n i a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n , C o r r i d o r M o b i l i t y I m p r o v e m e n t A c c o u n t ( C M I A ) , F e b r u a r y 2 0 0 7 P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t " O n R o u t e 9 1 f r o m G r e e n R i v e r R o a d t o S e r f a s C l u b D r i v e i n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y " , D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 6 O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y R e n e w e d M e a s u r e M T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I n v e s t m e n t P l a n , N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 6 P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t " O n R o u t e 9 1 f r o m S t a t e R o u t e 2 4 1 i n O r a n g e C o u n t y t o P i e r c e S t r e e t i n t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y " , O c t o b e r 2 0 0 6 R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - O r a n g e C o u n t y M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y ( M I S ) F i n a l P r o j e c t R e p o r t : L o c a l l y P r e f e r r e d S t r a t e g y R e p o r t , J a n u a r y 2 0 0 6 P r e l i m i n a r y d e s i g n p l a n s f o r E a s t b o u n d L a n e A d d i t i o n f r o m S R - 2 4 1 t o S R - 7 1 , 2 0 0 6 P r o j e c t S t u d y R e p o r t " W e s t b o u n d S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 A u x i l i a r y L a n e f r o m t h e N B S R - 5 5 N V B S R - 9 1 C o n n e c t o r t o t h e T u s t i n A v e n u e I n t e r c h a n g e " , J u l y 2 0 0 4 C a l i f o r n i a N e v a d a I n t e r s t a t e M a g l e v P r o j e c t R e p o r t , A n a h e i m - O n t a r i o S e g m e n t ; C a l i f o r n i a - N e v a d a S u p e r S p e e d T r a i n C o m m i s s i o n , A m e r i c a n M a g l i n e G r o u p , A u g u s t 2 0 0 3 R o u t e C o n c e p t R e p o r t s f o r S R - 9 1 , C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t s 8 a n d 1 2 V a r i o u s P r e l i m i n a r y D r a w i n g s a n d C r o s s S e c t i o n s , C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t s 8 a n d 1 2 2 0 1 3 S R - 9 1 I m p l e m e n t a t i o n P l a n 3 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Regional Arterial Funds — City of Perris Programming Request STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the request from the city of Perris (Perris) to program 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Regional Arterial funds in the amount of $2.3 million for the Harley Knox Boulevard widening project from Patterson Avenue to Perris Boulevard; 2) Approve Agreement No. 13-72-144-00 with Perris for Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funding for the construction phase; and • 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. • BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Over the past few years, the Commission has approved 2009 Western Riverside County MARA funds for projects ready for construction with the intention of creating as many jobs as possible given the recent economic recession and sluggish recovery. Thus far, the Commission approved $16.5 million for the following four projects: Lead Agency Project Programming Approval Amount Lake Elsinore 74/215 interchange July 2008 $ 2,000,000 Corona Foothill Parkway June 2012 7,000,000 San Jacinto Sanderson widening September 2012 4,500,000 County of Riverside SR-79 widening January 2013 3,000,000 $ 16,500,000 Perris is requesting $2.3 million for the construction of Harley Knox Boulevard from Patterson Avenue to Perris Boulevard. Staff initially recommended to the city that it apply for funds through the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects scheduled for Agenda Item 91 191 release in June with programming action in December 2013. The city indicated the project is ready for construction and, once completed, will become an important corridor that will also alleviate traffic currently using Ramona Expressway. This request is consistent with prior direction regarding requests for construction funds as a means of generating jobs. Given the environmental document was prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act, the project does not qualify for federal funds. The project is regional in nature and qualifies for MARA funds. Therefore, staff recommends programming $2.3 million of MARA funds for the Harley Knox Boulevard widening project in order to move the project into the construction phase _without delay. The amount programmed for the city of Lake Elsinore was expended in FY 2008/09, resulting in an outstanding programmed balance of $14.5 million. Approval of this request results in a programmed balance of $16.8 million in MARA funds. MARA reserves are sufficient to fund these projects. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2013/14 Amount: $2,300,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Regional Arterial (Western County) Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 005201 81301 266 72 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \44,444,1 Date: 05/24/13 • Agenda Item 91 192 " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m m i n g a n d P l a n n i n g M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : 2 0 1 3 M u l t i - F u n d i n g C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o a p p r o v e t h e r e l e a s e o f t h e 2 0 1 3 M u l t i - F u n d i n g C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 1 6 m i l l i o n o f f e d e r a l f u n d i n g a n d $ 3 5 m i l l i o n o f 2 0 0 9 W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y M e a s u r e A R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l ( M A R A ) f u n d s . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : O n J u l y 6 , 2 0 1 2 , t h e f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n b i l l , M o v i n g A h e a d f o r P r o g r e s s i n t h e 2 1 s t C e n t u r y ( M A P - 2 1 ) , w a s s i g n e d i n t o l a w . M A P - 2 1 i s a t w o - y e a r b i l l p r o v i d i n g o v e r $ 1 0 5 b i l l i o n n a t i o n w i d e f o r v a r i o u s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , h i g h w a y s , t r a n s i t , b i k e , a n d p e d e s t r i a n f a c i l i t i e s . I n t e r i m f e d e r a l g u i d a n c e f o r t h e f u n d i n g p r o g r a m s w a s r e l e a s e d a n d f u r t h e r g u i d a n c e i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t m a y r e s u l t i n a d j u s t m e n t s t o e s t i m a t e d f u n d l e v e l s a n d p r o g r a m r e q u i r e m e n t s . H o w e v e r , C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f b e l i e v e s t h a t a c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s s h o u l d b e i n i t i a t e d s o f u n d s c a n b e o b l i g a t e d i n a t i m e l y m a n n e r . M A P - 2 1 p r o g r a m s t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a l l o c a t i n g f u n d s i n c l u d e C o n g e s t i o n M i t i g a t i o n a n d A i r Q u a l i t y ( C M A Q ) , S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m ( S T P ) , a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A l t e r n a t i v e s P r o g r a m ( T A P ) . T h e a m o u n t o f f e d e r a l f u n d s a v a i l a b l e f o r p r o g r a m m i n g f o r F Y s 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 t h r o u g h 2 0 1 5 / 1 6 t h r o u g h t h i s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 1 6 m i l l i o n : C M A Q $ 6 1 m i l l i o n S T P 5 2 m i l l i o n T A P 3 m i l l i o n $ 1 1 6 m i l l i o n I n a d d i t i o n t o M A P - 2 1 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m i n c l u d e s f u n d i n g f o r W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y M A R A . D u e t o t h e r e c e n t , s l u g g i s h e c o n o m i c r e c o v e r y , M e a s u r e A M A R A r e v e n u e s w e r e l o w , a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n e l e c t e d t o p o s t p o n e a p r i o r c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s u n t i l s u c h t i m e t h a t M A R A A g e n d a I t e m 9 J 1 9 3 revenues increased to a level that would support a program of projects. The current projected level of MARA funding through FY 2014/15 is approximately $35 million. The 2014 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) will also provide additional programming capacity for this call for projects. STIP funds are primarily federal funds; however, these funds are directed to the state, and the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is responsible for allocating these funds. The 2014 STIP fund estimate is typically released in August of every odd year (next estimate in. August 2013) and adds two years of available funding for programming, typically in the out years, which will be FYs 2017/18 and 2018/19. Projects submitted through this call for projects will also be considered for 2014 STIP funding depending on project type, schedule, and funding capacity. The Commission established a STIP intra-county formula that identifies a percentage of funding to be allocated to each subregion (Western County, Eastern County, and Palo Verde Valley). Implementation of this formula guidance may vary with each STIP cycle depending on eligible projects and project schedules within each geographical area. While each STIP cycle allocation may not precisely hit the formula target, programming over a series of STIP cycles will ensure each geographic area reaches its formula target. The Commission will determine STIP project recommendations for Western Riverside County, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ('CVAG) will develop the project recommendations for the Coachella Valley. The city of Blythe will recommend projects for Palo Verde Valley STIP funds. CVAG will also conduct a separate call for projects for CMAQ funds apportioned to the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). Multi -Funding Call For Projects Agency Eligibility Fund Type Eligible Agencies CMAQ South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) Local Agencies and Transit Agencies (includes Western Riverside County & Pass Area) STP All Riverside County Local Agencies and Transit Agencies TAP All Riverside County Local Agencies and Transit Agencies MARA Western Riverside County Local Agencies STIP RCTC, CVAG, and Blythe per STIP Intra-county Formula Eligible Work The goal of this call for projects is to fund construction activities. Therefore, projects ready for construction and that meet the general requirements and criteria will be given priority for funding. The Commission also recognizes the need to • • Agenda Item 9y 194 " " h a v e p r o j e c t s r e a d y f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n i n t h e n e x t c y c l e o f f u n d i n g . T h e r e f o r e , u p t o f i v e p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l f u n d s a v a i l a b l e w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t a p p r o v a l a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t p h a s e . F o r s o m e p r o j e c t s , s u c h a s b i k e a n d p e d e s t r i a n f a c i l i t i e s , r e q u e s t s f o r r i g h t o f w a y f u n d s w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d s i n c e r i g h t o f w a y n e e d s w o u l d l i k e l y b e m i n o r . P r o c e s s i n g t h e o b l i g a t i o n o f f u n d i n g f o r r i g h t o f w a y a c t i v i t i e s i s q u i t e b u r d e n s o m e a n d i n v o l v e s a l e n g t h y p r o c e s s . M A P - 2 1 r e q u i r e s a n y p r o j e c t p h a s e , r e g a r d l e s s o f f u n d i n g o r d o l l a r a m o u n t , t o c o m p l y w i t h B u y A m e r i c a i f a N a t i o n a l E n v i r o n m e n t a l P r o t e c t i o n A c t d o c u m e n t w a s c o m p l e t e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t . A d d i t i o n a l l y , M A P - 2 1 B u y A m e r i c a p r o v i s i o n s r e q u i r e u t i l i t y c o m p a n i e s t o c o m p l y a n d c e r t i f y t h e m a t e r i a l s , s u c h a s i r o n a n d s t e e l , u s e d f o r f e d e r a l p r o j e c t s a r e m a d e i n A m e r i c a . S i n c e t h e B u y A m e r i c a p r o v i s i o n h a s b e e n d i f f i c u l t f o r u t i l i t y c o m p a n i e s t o m e e t a n d b e c a u s e o f t h e l e n g t h y o b l i g a t i o n p r o c e s s f o r r i g h t o f w a y f u n d i n g , i t i s r e c o m m e n d e d r i g h t o f w a y a c t i v i t i e s a r e f u n d e d w i t h n o n - f e d e r a l d o l l a r s t o m i n i m i z e p r o j e c t d e l a y s t o t h e e x t e n t p o s s i b l e . F u n d i n g P r o g r a m s B a s e d o n C a l t r a n s e s t i m a t e s f o r M A P - 2 1 C M A Q , S T P , a n d T A P f u n d i n g , i t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l a l l o c a t e a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 1 6 m i l l i o n i n f e d e r a l f u n d s . T h i s a m o u n t r e p r e s e n t s t h e t w o - y e a r M A P - 2 1 b i l l , a n d a l s o a n t i c i p a t e s a t h i r d y e a r o f f u n d i n g e i t h e r t h r o u g h c o n t i n u i n g r e s o l u t i o n s o f M A P - 2 1 o r a n e w f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n b i l l . I n 2 0 0 7 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a d o p t e d a p o l i c y s e t t i n g a s i d e 2 5 p e r c e n t o f C M A Q a n d S T P f u n d i n g f o r t h e A l a m e d a C o r r i d o r E a s t ( A C E ) g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n p r o j e c t s . T h e A C E p r o j e c t s a r e b e i n g i m p l e m e n t e d t h r o u g h a c o m b i n a t i o n o f l o c a l , s t a t e , a n d f e d e r a l f u n d s . F o r t h i s r e a s o n , g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n s a r e n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h i s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s . C M A Q T h e C M A Q p r o g r a m i s g e a r e d t o w a r d p r o j e c t s o r p r o g r a m s t h a t a r e a i r q u a l i t y b e n e f i c i a l a n d p r o v i d e c o n g e s t i o n r e l i e f . S p e c i f i c a l l y , p r o j e c t s o r p r o g r a m s m u s t c o n t r i b u t e t o a t t a i n m e n t o r m a i n t e n a n c e o f o z o n e a n d c a r b o n m o n o x i d e . M A P - 2 1 a l s o r e c o g n i z e s P a r t i c u l a t e M a t t e r 2 . 5 ( P M 2 . 5 ) a n d r e q u i r e s 2 5 p e r c e n t o f t h e s t a t e ' s C M A Q a p p o r t i o n m e n t t o b e s p e n t o n r e d u c i n g P M 2 . 5 . P r o j e c t s e l i g i b l e f o r C M A Q f u n d i n g g e n e r a l l y i n c l u d e : " T r a f f i c f l o w i m p r o v e m e n t s t r a f f i c s i g n a l c o n t r o l s y s t e m s , i n c i d e n t m a n a g e m e n t p r o g r a m s , h i g h o c c u p a n c y v e h i c l e l a n e s , a n d t r u c k c l i m b i n g l a n e s t h a t a r e n o t c a p a c i t y i n c r e a s i n g ; " T r a n s i t p r o j e c t s ; " B i c y c l e a n d p e d e s t r i a n f a c i l i t i e s p r o g r a m s ; " T r a v e l d e m a n d m a n a g e m e n t ; A g e n d a I t e m 9 J 1 9 5 " O u t r e a c h a n d r i d e s h a r e a c t i v i t i e s ; " T e l e c o m m u t i n g ; " A l t e r n a t i v e f u e l p r o g r a m s ; " T r a n s p o r t a t i o n a c t i v i t i e s i n a n a p p r o v e d s t a t e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n p l a n o r m a i n t e n a n c e p l a n ; a n d " T r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o n t r o l m e a s u r e s t h a t r e s u l t i n a i r q u a l i t y b e n e f i t s . C a p a c i t y e n h a n c i n g p r o j e c t s a r e n o t e l i g i b l e f o r C M A Q f u n d s , a s t h e s e p r o j e c t s l e a d t o i n c r e a s e d v e h i c l e e m i s s i o n s . A l l C M A Q f u n d e d p r o j e c t s a r e r e q u i r e d t o h a v e a n a i r q u a l i t y a s s e s s m e n t a n d p r o v e t h e p r o j e c t s o r p r o g r a m s w i l l c o n t r i b u t e t o a t t a i n m e n t o r m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e n a t i o n a l a m b i e n t a i r q u a l i t y s t a n d a r d s . T h i s a s s e s s m e n t i s s u b m i t t e d t o C a l t r a n s L o c a l A s s i s t a n c e a s p a r t o f t h e r e q u e s t f o r a u t h o r i z a t i o n p a c k a g e f o r o b l i g a t i o n o f f u n d s . C M A Q f u n d s a r e d i s t r i b u t e d a n d a p p o r t i o n e d t o a i r b a s i n s . I n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , t h e r e a r e t w o a i r b a s i n s - S C A B a n d S S A B . T h e a m o u n t a v a i l a b l e f o r S C A B C M A Q f u n d s t h r o u g h t h i s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 6 1 m i l l i o n ; t h e a m o u n t a v a i l a b l e f o r S S A B C M A Q f u n d s w i l l b e p r o g r a m m e d t h r o u g h C V A G ' s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s . T h e m i n i m u m m a t c h r e q u i r e m e n t f o r C M A Q p r o j e c t s i s 1 1 . 4 7 p e r c e n t . S T P P r o j e c t s e l i g i b l e f o r S T P f u n d i n g t h r o u g h t h i s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s a r e p r i m a r i l y f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f h i g h w a y s a n d L o c a l a r t e r i a l i m p r o v e m e n t s i n c l u d i n g c a p a c i t y e n h a n c e m e n t s . P r i o r S T P p r o j e c t s a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n h a v e i n c l u d e d i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t s , h i g h w a y w i d e n i n g , a n d b r i d g e a n d a r t e r i a l w i d e n i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s . S T P f u n d s a r e a p p o r t i o n e d t o t h r e e d i f f e r e n t p o p u l a t i o n c a t e g o r i e s : u n d e r $ 5 , 0 0 0 , u n d e r $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 , a n d o v e r $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . C a l t r a n s L o c a l A s s i s t a n c e m o n i t o r s t h e o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r e a c h o f t h e s e p o p u l a t i o n c a t e g o r i e s . S t a f f w i l l c o n s i d e r t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f p r o j e c t s i n t h e s e a p p o r t i o n m e n t c a t e g o r i e s d u r i n g t h e e v a l u a t i o n s . T h e a m o u n t o f S T P f u n d s a v a i l a b l e t h r o u g h t h i s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 5 2 m i l l i o n , a n d t h e m i n i m u m l o c a l m a t c h r e q u i r e d f o r e a c h S T P ; p r o j e c t i s 1 1 . 4 7 p e r c e n t . T A P M A P - 2 1 r e s t r u c t u r e d t h e f o r m e r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n E n h a n c e m e n t A c t i v i t i e s p r o g r a m a s t h e T A P a n d d i s t r i b u t e s 5 0 p e r c e n t t o t h e m e t r o p o l i t a n p l a n n i n g o r g a n i z a t i o n s ( M P O ) a n d 5 0 p e r c e n t t o t h e s t a t e . T h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s a g r e e d t o t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e 5 0 p e r c e n t o f M P O T A P f u n d s t o t h e " A g e n d a I t e m 9 J 1 9 6 " c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n s a n d a l l o w i n g t h e m t o s e l e c t t h e p r o j e c t s . T h e e s t i m a t e d T A P a m o u n t a v a i l a b l e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s $ 3 m i l l i o n w i t h a m i n i m u m l o c a l m a t c h r e q u i r e m e n t o f 2 0 p e r c e n t . T h e s t a t e i s d e v e l o p i n g a n e w p r o g r a m f o r i t s 5 0 p e r c e n t o f M A P - 2 1 T A P f u n d s , w h i c h w i l l b e f o c u s e d o n b i c y c l e a n d p e d e s t r i a n f a c i l i t i e s . T h e s t a t e ' s p r o g r a m i s s e p a r a t e f r o m t h e M P O T A P p r o g r a m ; h o w e v e r , c o n s i s t e n c y w i t h t h e s t a t e ' s p r o g r a m w i l l n e e d t o b e c o n s i d e r e d . I n a d d i t i o n t o a p p l i c a t i o n s r e c e i v e d i n t h e 2 0 1 3 M u l t i - F u n d i n g C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s , s t a f f w i l l a l s o c o n s i d e r p r o j e c t s r e c e n t l y s u b m i t t e d f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s 2 0 1 3 S B 8 2 1 C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s g i v e n t h a t S B 8 2 1 p r o j e c t s a r e p r i m a r i l y b i c y c l e a n d p e d e s t r i a n f a c i l i t i e s / i m p r o v e m e n t s . A p p l i c a t i o n s f o r S B 8 2 1 f u n d s w e r e d u e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n M a y 1 6 , 2 0 1 3 , a n d t h e p r o j e c t f u n d i n g r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s w i l l b e p r e s e n t e d a t t h e J u l y C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g . T A P f u n d i n g w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d t o f u n d p r o j e c t s n o t r e c o m m e n d e d f o r S B 8 2 1 f u n d i n g d u e t o l i m i t e d f u n d i n g a v a i l a b i l i t y . H o w e v e r , S B 8 2 1 f u n d s a r e s t a t e f u n d s a n d d o n o t n e c e s s a r i l y f o l l o w f e d e r a l f u n d i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . T h e r e f o r e , c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h p r o j e c t s p o n s o r s o n t h e a b i l i t y t o d e l i v e r a f e d e r a l l y - f u n d e d p r o j e c t w i l l n e e d t o b e d e t e r m i n e d i n o r d e r t o a p p r o v e T A P f u n d s s u b m i t t e d u n d e r t h e S B 8 2 1 C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s . M A R A T h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A E x p e n d i t u r e P l a n i n c l u d e s f u n d i n g t o w i d e n e x i s t i n g r o a d s a n d c o n s t r u c t n e w r o a d s o n t h e r e g i o n a l a r t e r i a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s y s t e m i n W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . A n e s t i m a t e d $ 3 0 0 m i l l i o n i n r e v e n u e s g e n e r a t e d b y M e a s u r e A i s a v a i l a b l e f o r W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y r e g i o n a l a r t e r i a l s . M a t c h i n g r e v e n u e s w o u l d b e g e n e r a t e d b y t h e c i t i e s a n d c o u n t y i m p l e m e n t i n g a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) p r o g r a m a d m i n i s t e r e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n ( T U M F R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l f u n d s ) o r t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n c i l o f G o v e r n m e n t s ( T U M F Z o n e f u n d s ) . M A R A r e v e n u e s i n i t i a l l y g e n e r a t e d l e s s t h a n a n t i c i p a t e d l e v e l s d u e t o t h e r e c e s s i o n . H o w e v e r , i n o r d e r t o p r o t e c t a n d c r e a t e j o b s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n p r e v i o u s l y a l l o c a t e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 6 . 5 m i l l i o n o f M A R A f u n d s s p e c i f i c a l l y t o l o c a l a g e n c i e s w i t h e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t s r e a d y f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n . A n o t h e r p r o j e c t a l l o c a t i o n f o r $ 2 . 3 m i l l i o n i s t h e s u b j e c t o f a n o t h e r a g e n d a i t e m a t t h i s m e e t i n g . A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e r e i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 3 5 m i l l i o n p r o j e c t e d t o b e a v a i l a b l e i n t h e M A R A a c c o u n t f o r t h i s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s . 2 0 1 4 S T I P T h e 2 0 1 4 S T I P i s a f i v e - y e a r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t p r o g r a m p r o v i d i n g f u n d i n g f o r F Y s 2 0 1 4 / 1 5 t h r o u g h 2 0 1 9 / 2 0 . T h e C o m m i s s i o n p r e v i o u s l y s e l e c t e d A g e n d a I t e m 9 J 1 9 7 projects on the state highway system for STIP funding due to the emphasis placed on on -system projects by the CTC. The 2014 STIP fund estimate is estimated to be released in August 2013, which will identify the amount of funds available for programming for each county in the state. As with past fund estimates, programming capacity is usually in the last two years of the STIP cycle. Therefore, staff does not anticipate programming new STIP projects in the near term. However, projects submitted through the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects scheduled for delivery beyond FY 2015/16 could be considered for 2014 STIP funds along with the Commission's project proposals. Project Selection Process General criteria for each fund source or project category will consist of regional significance, project readiness, local match, safety, air quality, cost 'benefit, and regional transportation plan (RTP)/sustainability communities strategy (SCS) consistency. Project evaluations will be conducted by staff and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which is primarily comprised of public works directors. Project sponsors will provide a brief background on their respective project applications and can respond to comments or questions. Projects will be ranked with similar projects and/or within funding categories. Staff will recommend the funding source most appropriate for the project. In addition, staff will recommend a program of projects that can demonstrate a balance of projects that meet multimodal transportation needs and air quality goals. Local agencies should anticipate federal funds and provide project schedules that accommodate obligation of federal funds. Western County regional arterial projects that may qualify for MARA funds will be required to submit two project schedules, with and without federal funding. Criteria Points will be assigned for each criterion and will range from 1 to 10, or 1 to 5 depending on the criterion. Criterion Maximum Points Regional Significance 10 Project Readiness 10 Local Match 10 Safety 5 *Air Quality 5 *Cost Benefit 5 Consistency with RTP/SCS 10 Maximum Total 55 it Duality and Cost Benefrt Analyses will be performed by the Commission's air quality consultant. • Agenda Item 9J 198 " S c h e d u l e " A p p l i c a t i o n s w i l l b e d u e 1 2 w e e k s f r o m t h e r e l e a s e d a t e . I t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h e a p p l i c a t i o n p a c k a g e w i l l b e r e l e a s e d b y t h e e n d o f J u n e a n d p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n s w i l l b e d u e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 3 . D e p e n d i n g o n t h e a m o u n t o f a p p l i c a t i o n s r e c e i v e d , p r o j e c t s w i l l b e r e v i e w e d a n d e v a l u a t e d b y s t a f f a n d T A C d u r i n g t h e m o n t h s o f O c t o b e r a n d N o v e m b e r . P r o j e c t r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s w i l l b e f o r w a r d e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a t i t s D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 3 m e e t i n g . T i m e l y I m p l e m e n t a t i o n U p o n t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a p p r o v a l o f p r o j e c t s , s t a f f w i l l i n c o r p o r a t e t h e a p p r o v e d p r o j e c t s i n t o t h e F e d e r a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m b a s e d o n t h e s c h e d u l e s p r o v i d e d a n d p r o g r a m m i n g c a p a c i t y . S t a f f w i l l c l o s e l y m o n i t o r t h e d e l i v e r y o f t h e a p p r o v e d p r o j e c t s t o e n s u r e p r o j e c t s a r e m e e t i n g p r o j e c t m i l e s t o n e s a n d o b l i g a t i o n d e a d l i n e s . I t i s e x p e c t e d t h a t a l l p r o j e c t s a p p r o v e d f o r f u n d i n g w i l l o b l i g a t e f u n d s w i t h i n t h r e e y e a r s . S t a f f w i l l r e p o r t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n t h e s t a t u s o f p r o j e c t s e x p e r i e n c i n g d e l a y s . F i s c a l I m p a c t : T h e f e d e r a l a n d s t a t e f u n d s a r e a d m i n i s t e r e d t h r o u g h C a ! t r a n s ; t h e r e f o r e , t h e r e i s n o f i n a n c i a l i m p a c t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n . T h e M A R A f u n d s a r e a d m i n i s t e r e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n , a n d t h e p r o j e c t e d M A R A f u n d s t h r o u g h F Y 2 0 1 4 / 1 5 o f $ 3 5 m i l l i o n a r e a v a i l a b l e t o f u n d t h i s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s . A g e n d a I t e m 9 J 1 9 9 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : G r a c e A l v a r e z , S e n i o r S t a f f A n a l y s t S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m m i n g a n d P l a n n i n g M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : F e d e r a l S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m 2 0 1 3 R e h a b i l i t a t i o n P r o j e c t s - A d d i t i o n a l P r o j e c t P r o g r a m m i n g C a l l f o r S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o a p p r o v e p r o g r a m m i n g f e d e r a l S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m ( S T P ) f u n d s f o r r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 , 2 6 8 , 0 0 0 a s p r e s e n t e d . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : A t i t s M a r c h 2 0 1 3 m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d a 2 0 1 3 C a l l f o r R e h a b i l i t a t i o n P r o j e c t s t o b e f u n d e d w i t h f e d e r a l S T P f u n d s i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 3 . 8 m i l l i o n . T h e a m o u n t a v a i l a b l e i s a s e t a s i d e o f 2 0 p e r c e n t o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ' s F F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 S T P a p p o r t i o n m e n t e s t i m a t e p r o v i d e d b y C a ! t r a n s . C r i t e r i a u s e d f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g a l l o c a t i o n t a r g e t s f o r e a c h c i t y a n d t h e c o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e w e r e 2 0 1 0 C e n s u s p o p u l a t i o n a n d F e d e r a l F u n c t i o n a l C l a s s i f i c a t i o n S y s t e m l a n e m i l e s , w h i c h w e r e w e i g h t e d 5 0 / 5 0 . S T P f u n d s a r e r e q u i r e d t o b e m a t c h e d a t a m i n i m u m o f 1 1 . 4 7 p e r c e n t . S t a f f r e c e i v e d a p p l i c a t i o n s t o f u n d 2 1 p r o j e c t s b y t h e A p r i l 1 , 2 0 1 3 d e a d l i n e , w h i c h w e r e b r o u g h t f o r w a r d f o r a c t i o n a t t h e M a y C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g . A t t h e t i m e t h e S T P 2 0 1 3 C a l l f o r R e h a b i l i t a t i o n P r o j e c t s w a s r e l e a s e d , i t w a s a g r e e d t h a t a g e n c i e s w o u l d b e g i v e n m o r e t i m e t o s u b m i t a p p l i c a t i o n s . S i x a d d i t i o n a l c i t i e s s u b m i t t e d t h e i r S T P r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n s i n c l u d i n g C a l i m e s a , C o a c h e l l a , E a s t v a l e , L a k e E l s i n o r e , N o r c o , a n d P a l m D e s e r t , f o r c o m b i n e d S T P f u n d i n g o f $ 1 , 2 6 8 , 0 0 0 . S t a f f r e v i e w e d t h e p r o j e c t s u b m i t t a l s f o r c o m p l e t e n e s s a n d r e c o m m e n d s t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e t h e s i x p r o j e c t s t o t a l i n g $ 1 , 2 6 8 , 0 0 0 i n S T P f u n d s w i t h t h e l o c a l a g e n c i e s c o m m i t t i n g a t o t a l o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 m i l l i o n i n l o c a l f u n d s . S t a f f e x p e c t s t h e s e p r o j e c t s t o b e o b l i g a t e d b y t h e e n d o f F F Y 2 0 1 4 / 1 5 . T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l b e u p d a t e d o n t h e s t a t u s o f d e l a y e d p r o j e c t s , i f a n y . A g e n d a I t e m 9 K 2 0 0 Upon Commission approval, staff will program the projects in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). Once the projects are in an approved FTIP, project sponsors will work with Caltrans District 8 Office of Local Assistance to complete the federal requirements for obligating the funds. With approval of this request, a total of $13,410,000 in STP funds will have been programmed, resulting in a balance available of $390,000. The following three local agencies have not submitted projects for STP rehabilitation funds cities of Beaumont, Blythe, and Indian Wells. Staff recommends allowing these agencies more time to submit their respective project(s). If these agencies have not submitted rehabilitation projects by October 1, 2013, the funds will be added to the STP for the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects. Federal STP funds are administered through Caltrans; therefore there is no financial impact to the Commission. Attachment: Additional Project Programming for the STP 2013 Call for Rehabilitation Projects • Agenda Item 9K 201 Calimesa RIV130401 AND RIV130402 - GROUPED PRO Calimesa and Avenue L Pavement Rehab LISTING FOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Calimesa Blvd from Sandalwood to Avenue L and Avenue L from Calimesa Blvd to Calimesa and Avenue L. $54 $7 $61 Coachella Grapefruit Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation/Reconstruction Grapefruit Blvd. between 3rd St. and 9th St. $215 $40 $255 Eastvale Schleisman Ave. Pavement Rehab Schleisman Ave. from Sumner Ave. to Harrison $199 $401 $600 Lake Elsinore Gunnerson St. Pavement Rehabilitation Gunnerson Ave. from SR 74 to Lakeshore Dr. $286 $189 $475 Norco Pavement Overlay Palm Desert Portola Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Various Streets in Norco Portola Ave. from Country Club Dr. to 100' N/O Desert Willow Ct. $178 $23 $201 $336 $329 $665 Totals $1,268 $989 $2,257 Projects Approved May 2013 $12,142 $4,340 $16,482 Total Projects Approved as of June 2013 $13,410 $5,329 $18,739 Total STP Funds Available $13, 800 Remaining STP Funds $390 202 " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : T h e r e s i a T r e v i n o , C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m m i n g a n d P l a n n i n g M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A P r o g r a m M a i n t e n a n c e o f E f f o r t f o r t h e C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A M a i n t e n a n c e o f E f f o r t ( M O E ) b a s e y e a r l e v e l o f $ 9 3 7 , 0 0 7 f o r t h e c i t y o f L a Q u i n t a ( L a Q u i n t a ) b e g i n n i n g w i t h F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 ; 2 ) S p l i t M e a s u r e A r e v e n u e s o n a 5 0 / 5 0 b a s i s b e t w e e n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s ( C V A G ) a n d L a Q u i n t a , u n t i l s u c h t i m e L a Q u i n t a r e i m b u r s e s C V A G f o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) f e e s C V A G w o u l d h a v e r e c e i v e d f r o m L a Q u i n t a i f L a Q u i n t a h a d j o i n e d t h e T U M F p r o g r a m w h e n t h e T U M F w a s e s t a b l i s h e d ; a n d 3 ) A l l o c a t e L a Q u i n t a ' s s h a r e o f M e a s u r e A l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f u n d s s t a r t i n g i n J u l y 2 0 1 3 , w h i c h r e p r e s e n t s s a l e s t a x e s e a r n e d i n M a y 2 0 1 3 . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : L a Q u i n t a h a s n o t p a r t i c i p a t e d i n T U M F i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y s i n c e i t s i n c e p t i o n . I n 2 0 1 2 , L a Q u i n t a i n i t i a t e d t h e p r o c e s s t o j o i n T U M F i n o r d e r t o r e c e i v e i t s s h a r e o f t h e M e a s u r e A l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f u n d s f o r t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y . O n F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 3 , t h e L a Q u i n t a C i t y C o u n c i l a p p r o v e d R e s o l u t i o n N o . 2 0 1 3 - 0 0 7 e s t a b l i s h i n g T U M F p u r s u a n t t o O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 a n d a n a g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n C V A G a n d L a Q u i n t a f o r e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f t h e T U M F p r o g r a m . O n F e b r u a r y 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 , t h e L a Q u i n t a C i t y C o u n c i l u n a n i m o u s l y a p p r o v e d t h e a t t a c h e d O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 , a n o r d i n a n c e o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o f t h e C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a , C a l i f o r n i a , a d o p t i n g C h a p t e r 3 . 3 3 o f t h e L a Q u i n t a M u n i c i p a l C o d e p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e c o l l e c t i o n o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e s . T U M F b e c a m e e f f e c t i v e i n L a Q u i n t a o n A p r i l 2 2 , 2 0 1 3 ; h o w e v e r , d u e t o t h e p a r t i a l p e r i o d r e p r e s e n t i n g l e s s t h a n h a l f o f t h e m o n t h o f A p r i l a n d d i f f i c u l t i e s o b t a i n i n g s u f f i c i e n t d a t a t o m e a s u r e a n y s a l e s t a x e s f o r t h a t p e r i o d , L a Q u i n t a s t a f f a g r e e d t h a t a l l o c a t i o n o f M e a s u r e A f u n d s w o u l d c o m m e n c e w i t h s a l e s t a x e s g e n e r a t e d M a y 2 0 1 3 . A g e n d a I t e m 9 L 2 0 3 As part of the agreement to join the Coachella Valley TUMF program, La Quinta is required to repay CVAG for the TUMF fees La Quinta would have received if La Quinta participated in the TUMF program since its inception. The repayment amount is approximately $5.5 million. In order to facilitate this payment, CVAG and La Quinta agreed to allocate 50 percent of La Quinta's local share of Measure A local streets and roads funds to La Quinta and 50 percent to CVAG for repayment of TUMF fees. Once the TUMF is fully repaid (projected in 2023), La Quinta will receive 100 percent of its share of Measure A local streets and roads funds. Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies in order to receive local streets and roads funds. The 2009 Measure A ordinance continued the original 1989 Measure A requirement for local agencies to maintain a commitment of local discretionary expenditures toward transportation construction and maintenance activities. This requirement is implemented through the approval of a base year expenditure level known as MOE, ensuring Measure A funds supplement current expenditures, not supplant them. In accordance with the 2009 ` Measure A ordinance, if local agencies do not meet their respective MOE base year level in a given year, Measure A local streets and roads disbursements will be withheld the following year. Funds withheld from a local agency for failure to meets its MOE Base Year requirement will be distributed in accordance with Ordinance No.'02-001 within the Measure A area in which the agency is located (Western County, Coachella Valley, or Palo Verde Valley). Other requirements for Measure A participation and disbursement include: 1) annual submittal of the local agency Five -Year Capital improvement Plan (CIP); 2) MOE Certification; 3) project status report for prior year plan; and 4) participation in the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and TUMF programs, as applicable. At its July 2010 meeting, the Commission approved the MOE guidelines developed by staff and the Technical Advisory Committee The MOE guidelines also indicated the implementation of the 2009 MOE base year levels would be applicable to FY 2011 /12. In 2011, the Commission approved the 2009 MOE base year levels for all eligible cities. La Quinta submitted the 2009 MOE base year level of $937,007, which is attached, in compliance with the 2009 MOE guidelines. Since La Quinta's first Measure A local streets and roads allocation for May 2013 would be disbursed in July 2013, due to a two -month lag in receipt by the Commission from the State Board of Equalization, staff recommends the 2009 'MOE base year level be applicable beginning with FY 2013/14. Accordingly, La Quinta will submit the annual MOE certification and the five-year CIP for FY 2013/14. Additionally • Agenda Item 9L 204 " L a Q u i n t a ' s s h a r e o f M e a s u r e A l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s r e v e n u e s w i l l b e s p l i t o n a 5 0 / 5 0 b a s i s b e t w e e n C V A G a n d L a Q u i n t a u n t i l s u c h t i m e L a Q u i n t a f u l l y r e i m b u r s e s C V A G f o r t h e T U M F s h o r t f a l l . A t t a c h m e n t s : 1 ) C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a S t a f f R e p o r t D a t e d F e b r u a r y 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 2 ) 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A M O E B a s e Y e a r S u b m i t t a l A g e n d a I t e m 9 L 2 0 5 FY 2009/10 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures (Round to nearest dollar) Funding Breakdown P enditures Included in General Ledger Total cost General Fund Meas A Federal State City Funds Other on: Washington Street Storm Drain Improvements $ 4,503.00 S 4,503.00 . - Automall Public Improvement Reimbursement $ 198,454.00 $ 198,454.00 Avenue 52 Improvement Bridge g-��,;:,•;. $ 265,919.00 $ • 265,919.00 Jefferson Street Median Island landscaping $ 4,263.00 - $ 4,263.00 Dune Palms Road Development $ 433,221.00 - $ 433,221.00 Adams Street Bridge Improvements ;,�'�' $ 575,553.00 $ 502,034.00 $ - $ 73,519.00 Highway 111 Phase III Street Improvements $ 1,676,131.00 $ (61,243.03) $ 1,737,374.03 - Fred Waring Drive Street and Signal Improvements $ 2,023.00 - - $ - 2,023.00 New Traffic Signal - Desert Club @ Avenue 52 ':. $ 406,003.00 $ 406,003.00 Old Town Pedestrian Crossing "x $ 115,243.00 $ 51,920.00 $ 63,323.00 Washington Street Improvements (Minor Widening @ Ave 50) g $ 34,223.00 $ 34,223.00 - TDM/TSM Washington/Hwy 111 Corridor Study $ - 47,902.00 $ (3,939.62) $ 51,841.62 Horseshoe Drive Drainage Improvements $ 35,876.00 $ 35,876.00 Avenue 50 Bridge Improvements y � $ 1,252.00 $ 1,252.00 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50 to Ave 52) t' $ 1,125.00 $ 1,125.00 _ Highway 111 Median Island Landscaping $ 45,108.00 $ 45,108.00 Dune Palms Road Street Improvements .$ 31,750.00 - $ 31,750.00 A Street Extension (Dune Palms to DSUSD Driveway) $ 76,103.00 $ • 76,103.00 Highway 111 Utility Undergrounding $ 2,662.00 $ 2,662.00 Drainage Improvements (NE Comer Simon & Washington) $ 21,855.00 $ 21,855.00' Jefferson Street Parkway Landscaping sq,; $ 496,402.00 $ 496,402.00 Misc. Street Improvements $ 84,788.00 $ 84,788.00 Highway 111 Signal Interconnect v.'E,' $ 234,163.00 $ 78,268.00 $ 155,895.00 Lions' Gate Sidewalk & Parkway Landscape $ 52,508.00 $ 52,508.00 Village Sidewalk lnfilllmprovements ,;i �;; $ 24,124.00 $ 24,124.00 Dune Palms Highway 111 (RDA Low Mod) „'I $ 27,692.00 $ 27,692.00 Eisenhower Drive Signal Synchronization ,;; $ 4,143.00 $ 4,143.00 ' - Adams Street Signal Synchronization $ 4,476.00 - $ 4,476.00 New Traffic Signal - Madison St. @ Ave 54 �,.�,, $ 5,196.00 $ 5,196 00 Maintenance: Maintenance and Repair of Streets Street.Maintenance (salaries and benefits-mtnce) $ 1,019,418.02 $ 526,966.02 $ 492,452.00 Street Maintenance (other services & supplies) $ 543,496.06 $ - - _ $ 543,496.06 Stree amtenance (Citywide Slurry Seal & repairs only) $ 1,114,122.00 $ 1,018,716.06 $ 95,405.94 Tr l Maintenance $ 117,044.00 $ 117,044.00 Engineerinq/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects: $506,262.29 $506,262-29 • `,j£,i. '•pN ..���..".�.�i.Y..i� kn'�`kr,.=w,9� �'s �k V�i�`�s-�"s 3"_°�A�.`�e�.o4,- .r; s4�,f'b.... %,.s'&3.'. , .'Tfrs�i-.'ta�` �1 '..c\9 as'i. 3�.� t Deductions for Special Consideration (Deductions Must Also Be Included in Project Expenditures Above): - - - Total Project Cost General Fund State Reason Why Project Expenditure Should Be Deducted from MOE Construction: Automall Public Improvement Reimbursement $ 198,454.00 $ (198,454.00) Developer- Sales Tax Reimbursement RAW Developer Disposition Agreement (DOA)) New Traffic Signal- Desert Club @ Avenue 52 $ 406,003.00 $ (406,003.00) Fire Tax Credit from County of Riverside Maintenance: Street Maintenance (Citywide Slurry Seal &repairs only) $ 1,114,122.00 $ (682,539.76) Tire proposed deduct represents Citywide Slurry Seal and Restriping Program, which is performed every - three years. This represents 2/3 of amount incurred in FY 2010. Last major slurry project was in FY 2007. Street Maintenance (salaries and benefits -mince) $ 1,019,418.02 $ (97,337.00) FY 2010 PERS Lump sum payment (one-time payment) Engmeerinp/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to S fic Projects. 506,262.29 (506,262.29 - - Y...-,iltyANhd1,S , i 206 CITY! Tuft etflatibilai / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2013 ITEM TITLE: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 507 Adding Chapter 3.33 of the La Quinta Municipal Code Pertaining to the Collection of Transportation. Uniform Mitigation Fees AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: S STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: • Adopt Ordinance No. 507 on second reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City of La Quinta has not been' a part of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG") Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program ("TUMF"). .In 2012, the City initiated the process to join TUMF in order to receive its local share of the Measure "A" one-half cent sales tax funds. • The recommended action will facilitate the City's entry into TUMF. The City will then receive Measure "A" funds, which will be pledged to annual street maintenance. • Per the CVAG/City Agreement approved by Council on February 5, 2013, the City and CVAG will allocate 50% of La Quinta's local share of Measure "A" funds for annual street maintenance and 50% to CVAG to repay them to fund the TUMF fees that they would have received if the City participated in the TUMF program since its inception. This amount is $5.5 million. Once the TUMF shortfall is repaid (projected to be in about 10 years), the City will receive 100% of its local share of Measure "A" funds. :v_ 064 207 As a member of TUMF, the City must annually prepare and submit a five- year Capital Improvement Plan to the Riverside County Transportation Commission detailing the expected uses of the sales tax funding, and annually certifying that' its discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation -related construction and maintenance activities meet or exceed the Maintenance of. Effort base year amount. • The City's Development Impact Fee collected for transportation purposes has been updated and assumes the City will become a TUMF- collecting member of CVAG in 2013. FISCAL IMPACT: The City will receive 50% of its local share 01.2 million) until the TUMF shortfall, estimated at $5.5 million, is paid. The City must pay interest on the TUMF shortfall, which will accrue at the rate of the Local Agency Investment Fund as determined on July 1 ' of each year, if the City adopts the TUMF Ordinance in February 2013, the TUMF will become effective on or about April 22, 2013 and the City would begin receiving sales tax funds by August 2013. Once in TUMF and until the conclusion of the program in 2039, the City will be required to spend $937,007 per year of its discretionary funds on road improvements or road maintenance in order to receive its Measure "A" funds. The Measure "A" funds will be available to fund transportation -related expenditures above and beyond the base expenditures of $937,007 per year. Once the TUMF shortfall is repaid (anticipated to occur in 2023), the City will then receive 100% of the City's share of Measure "A" funds for 1.6 years. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On February 5, 2013, the City Council unanimously approved motions to take up and introduce Ordinance No. 507 on first reading. Resolution 2013-007 entitled "Setting the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Amount Pursuant to Ordinance No. 507" was also unanimously approved along with the Agreement between CVAG and the City of La Quinta for establishment of the TUMF Program. ALTERNATIVES: An alternative to the recommended action is to continue to not participate in TUMF. Doing so would not allow the City to receive Measure "A" funds and would reduce the funding available for transportation related improvements. While TUMF membership does increase the development impact fees, all Riverside County cities participate in TUMF. Staff does not believe that this additional fee would place the City at a disadvantage. 208 ,065 " C H A R T E R C I T Y I M P L I C A T I O N S i f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l a d o p t s t h e T U M F P r o g r a m , t h e C i t y w i l l b e g i n r e c e i v i n g i t s p r o p o r t i o n a t e s h a r e o f t h e M e a s u r e " A " o n e - h a l f c e n t s a l e s t a x . B e c a u s e t h e s a l e s t a x i s c o l l e c t e d c o u n t y w i d e , i t i s c o n s i d e r e d r e g i o n a l i n . n a t u r e a n d p r o j e c t s f u n d e d t h r o u g h i t a r e s u b j e c t t o p r e v a i l i n g w a g e r e q u i r e m e n t s . P r e v a i l i n g w a g e s a r e . r e q u i r e d f o r o t h e r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s w h e r e l o c a l f u n d s a r e m i x e d w i t h o t h e r n o n - l o c a l f u n d s . R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d , S u s a n M a y s e l s C i t y C l e r k 2 0 9 C 6 6 " R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 1 3 - 0 0 7 A R E S O L U T I O N O F T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L O F - T H E C I T Y O F L A Q U I N T A , C A L I F O R N I A , S E T T I N G T H E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N U N I F O R M M I T I G A T I O N F E E A M O U N T P U R S U A N T T O O R D I N A N C E N O . 5 0 7 W H E R E A S , t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , o f t h e C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a , C a l i f o r n i a b y O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 e s t a b l i s h e d a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e b a s e d o n c e r t a i n f i n d i n g s i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o t h e f o l l o w i n g : ( 1 ) F u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t w i t h i n t h e C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a a n d w i t h i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y t o t h e y e a r 2 0 3 0 w i l l r e s u l t i n t r a f f i c v o l u m e s i n e x c e s s o f c a p a c i t y t h e r e b y a d v e r s e l y i m p a c t i n g t h e r e g i o n a l s y s t e m , o f s t r e e t s , a r t e r i a l s a n d h i g h w a y s n o w e x i s t i n g ; ( 2 ) F a i l u r e t o e x p a n d t h e c a p a c i t y o f t h e e x i s t i n g c i r c u l a t i o n s y s t e m w i l l c a u s e u n a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l s o f c o n g e s t i o n o n t h e s t r e e t s , a r t e r i a l s , a n d h i g h w a y s o f t h e r e g i o n a l s y s t e m ; ( 3 ) A b s e n t a u n i f o r m m i t i g a t i o n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f e e i m p o s i n g a f a i r - s h a r e t r a f f i c i m p a c t f e e o n n e w d e v e l o p m e n t , e x i s t i n g a n d f u t u r e s o u r c e s o f r e v e n u e w i l l b e i n a d e q u a t e t o f u n d s u b s t a n t i a l p o r t i o n s o f t h e R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t s n e e d e d t o a v o i d u n a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l s o f c o n g e s t i o n a n d r e l a t e d a d v e r s e i m p a c t s ; ( 4 ) T h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e w i l l r a i s e t h e a d d i t i o n a l r e v e n u e s n e e d e d t o c o n s t r u c t t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s t o a c c o m m o d a t e t r a f f i c t h a t w i l l b e g e n e r a t e d b y d e v e l o p m e n t o f l a n d w i t h i n t h e C i t y a n d w i t h i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y ; ( 5 ) T h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e i s a f a i r a n d e q u i t a b l e m e t h o d f o r d i s t r i b u t i n g t h e u n f u n d e d c o s t s o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s n e c e s s a r y t o a c c o m m o d a t e t h e t r a f f i c v o l u m e s g e n e r a t e d b y n e w d e v e l o p m e n t ; a n d W H E R E A S , S e c t i o n 3 . 3 3 . 0 5 0 o f O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 r e q u i r e s t h a t t h e a m o u n t o f t h e m i t i g a t i o n f e e ( 1 ) s h a l l b e b a s e d o n t h e t r i p g e n e r a t i o n r a t e d e f i n e d i n C V A G ' s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e s H a n d b o o k , a c o p y o f w h i c h i s o n f i l e i n t h e C i t y ' s P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t , ( 2 ) s h a l l b e e s t a b l i s h e d b y t h e C i t y a n d ( 3 ) r e q u i r e s t h e C i t y t o a d o p t b y r e s o l u t i o n t h e f e e a s r e c o m m e n d e d b y C V A G o r a h i g h e r f e e a m o u n t ; a n d 2 1 0 Resolution No. 2013-007 TUMF Adopted: February 5, 2013 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council, in determining the amount of the mitigation fee, desires to ensure that the fee is calculated by a fair and equitable method to distribute the costs of the improvements necessary to accommodate traffic volumes generated by future growth. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1: Findings. Each WHEREAS paragraph, set forth above, is adopted as a specific finding of this City Council. The City Council further finds that: a. The report entitled "2006 Fee Schedule Update, Nexus Study Report" dated June 27, 2006 ("2006 Nexus Study") to establish updated TUMF Levels and program revenue collections .target, which was approved by the CVAG Executive Committee on July 31, 2006, accurately states the City's need to collect the TUMF fees along with the other participating jurisdictions within the Coachella Valley as requested by the CVAG General ,Assembly. The 2006 Nexus Study is hereby approved and incorporated herein by this reference. b. Based on the above findings, the La Quinta City Council adopts this resolution setting the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee amount and sets forth that amount as follows: $74.00 per average daily trip for sales tax producing commercial $148.00 per average daily trip for all other non-residential development $192.00 per average daily trip for all residential development c. The amount of the mitigation fee shall be based on the trip generation rate defined in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Handbook, a copy of which is on file in the City's Public Works Department. The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Handbook, effective July 1, 2009 is hereby approved and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective concurrent with Ordinance No. 507, on the_20 to day of April, 2013. SECTION 3. Amendments. The Council shall, pursuant to Ordinance No.507. annually review and if necessary, may amend the amount of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee to ensure that the fee continues to be a fair and equitable method to distribute the costs of the improvements necessary to accommodate traffic volumes generated by future growth. If CVAG amends the recommended amount of the fee pursuant to its annual review, _the Council shall amend this • • 211 Resolution No. 2013-007 TUMF Adopted: February 5, 2013 Page 3 resolution in accordance' with CVAG's recommended amended fee amount: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Osborne, Mayor Adolph NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: SUSAN WItAYSELS, City Cier City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: RINE JE N, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California DON AD L , ayor City of L Quint , California 212 ORDINANCE NO. 507 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 3.33 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE COLLECTION OF TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEES WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta ("City") is Member of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG"), a joint powers agency consisting of the County of Riverside ("County"), the Aqua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, the City of Blythe, and the nine cities situated in the Coachella Valley (collectively, "Member Agencies"); and WHEREAS, acting in concert, the Member Agencies developed : a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials within CVAG's jurisdiction (the "Regional System") could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF"). imposed on future residential, commercial and industrial development within the jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, as a Member of CVAG, the City participated in the preparation of the 1987 Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study (" 1987 Transportation Study") prepared pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Codesection 66000 et seq.); WHEREAS, CVAG commissioned Parsons Brinckerhoff to prepare an updated TUMF study entitled "2006 Fee Schedule Update, Nexus Study Report", and dated June 27, 2006 ("2006 Nexus Study") to establish updated TUMF levels and program revenue collection targets, which was approved by the CVAG Executive Committee on July 31, 2006; and WHEREAS, the 2006 Nexus Study revealed the need to revise the provisions of the. model TUMF ordinance to reflect changes in the Mitigation Fee Act, which governs the adoption and implementation of development impact fees and to reflect the findings of the 2006 Nexus Study; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Implementation Agreement relating to the TUMF, as a condition to the receipt of its share of the local portion of Measure "A" funds, each city was required to adopt and maintain a TUMF to be administered by CVAG under the terms of the Implementation Agreement; and 213 " " O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 T U M F A d o p t e d F e b r u a r y 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 P a g e 2 o f 9 W H E R E A S , t h e C i t y h a d n e v e r a d o p t e d n o r m a i n t a i n e d a T U M F p r o g r a m , t h e r e b y f o r f e i t i n g i t s s h a r e o f t h e l o c a l p o r t i o n o f M e a s u r e " A " ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e C i t y n o w d e s i r e s t o e s t a b l i s h t h e T U M F p r o g r a m w i t h i n i t s j u r i s d i c t i o n s o a s t o b e c o m e e l i g i b l e t o r e c e i v e i t s s h a r e o f t h e l o c a l p o r t i o n o f M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s ; W H E R E A S , b y n o t i c e d u l y g i v e n a n d p o s t e d , o n J a n u a r y 2 3 , 2 0 1 3 a n d o n J a n u a r y 3 0 , 2 0 1 3 , t h e C i t y C o u n c i l c o n d u c t e d a p u b l i c h e a r i n g t o c o n s i d e r a p p r o v a l o f t h e 2 0 0 6 N e x u s S t u d y a n d t h i s O r d i n a n c e ; a n d W H E R E A S , a t t h e t i m e a n d p l a c e s e t f o r t h e h e a r i n g , t h e C i t y C o u n c i l d u l y c o n s i d e r e d t h e d a t a a n d i n f o r m a t i o n p r o v i d e d b y C V A G , C i t y s t a f f a n d t h e p u b l i c r e l a t i v e t o t h e T U M F a n d a l l o t h e r c o m m e n t s , w h e t h e r w r i t t e n o r o r a l , s u b m i t t e d p r i o r t o t h e c o n c l u s i o n o f t h e h e a r i n g ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e C i t y C o u n c i l w i s h e s t o a c c u r a t e l y c o l l e c t T U M F f e e s a l o n g w i t h t h e o t h e r p a r t i c i p a t i n g j u r i s d i c t i o n s w i t h i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y a s r e q u e s t e d b y t h e C V A G G e n e r a l A s s e m b l y . N O W T H E R E F O R E , T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L O F T H E C I T Y O F L A Q U I N T A D O E S O R D A I N A S F O L L O W S : S E C T I O N 1 A D O P T C H A P T E R 3 . 3 3 " T R A N S P O R T A T I O N U N I F O R M M I T I G A T I O N F E E " T h e L a Q u i n t a M u n i c i p a l C o d e . C h a p t e r 3 . 3 3 , " T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e i s h e r e b y a d d e d t o r e a d a s f o l l o w s : C h a p t e r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e 3 . 3 3 . 0 1 0 P u r p o s e , u s e a n d f i n d i n g s . T h e C i t y C o u n c i l f i n d s a n d d e t e i - m i n e s a s f o l l o w s : A . T h e C i t y i s a M e m b e r A g e n c y o f t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s ( " C V A G " ) , a j o i n t p o w e r s a g e n c y c o n s i s t i n g o f p u b l i c a g e n c i e s s i t u a t e d i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y ( c o l l e c t i v e l y , " M e m b e r A g e n c i e s " ) . B . A c t i n g i n c o n c e r t , t h e M e m b e r A g e n c i e s d e v e l o p e d a p l a n w h e r e b y t h e . s h o r t f a l l i n f u n d s n e e d e d t o e n l a r g e t h e c a p a c i t y o f t h e R e g i o n a l - S y s t e m 2 1 4 Ordinance No. 507 TUMF Adopted February 19, 2013 Page 3 of 9 of Highways and Arterials within CVAG's jurisdiction (the "Regional System") could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") imposed on future residential, commercial and industrial development within the jurisdiction. C. That CVAG commissioned the preparation of various studies ("Fee Studies") which evaluate population and employment growth, future transportation needs and the availability of traditional transportation funding sources to establish updated TUMF levels and program revenue collection targets. D. That the Fee Studies, as periodically updated, make it -possible to determine a reasonable relationship between the cumulative regional impacts of new land development projects in the Coachella Valley on the Regional System and the need to mitigate these transportation impacts using funds levied through the TUMF program. E. That the Fee Studies, as periodically updated, establish the purposes of the TUMF, which may be summarized as a uniform development impact fee to help fund construction of the Regional System needed to accommodate growth in the Coachella Valley to the year 2030. F. That the Fee Studies, as periodically updated, establish that the TUMF proceeds will be used to help pay for the engineering, construction and acquisition of right of way for the Regional System improvements identified therein. Such improvements are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the development projects on which the TUMF will be levied. G. That the. Fee Studies, as periodically updated, establish a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF proceeds and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed. H. That the Fee Studies, as periodically updated, establish the reasonable relationship between the impact of new development and the need for the TUMF. I. That the TUMF program revenues to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share of these costs. • 215 " O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 T U M F A d o p t e d F e b r u a r y 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 P a g e 4 o f 9 J . T h a t t h e p r o j e c t s a n d m e t h o d o l o g y i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e F e e S t u d i e s , a s p e r i o d i c a l l y u p d a t e d , f o r t h e c o l l e c t i o n o f f e e s i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e g o a l s , p o l i c i e s , o b j e c t i v e s a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n m e a s u r e s o f t h e C i t y ' s G e n e r a l P l a n . K . T h a t t h e T U M F p r o g r a m c o m p l i e s w i t h t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e M i t i g a t i o n F e e A c t . 3 . 3 3 . 0 2 0 D e f i n i t i o n s F o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h i s c h a p t e r , t h e f o l l o w i n g w o r d s a n d p h r a s e s s h a l l h a v e t h e m e a n i n g s r e s p e c t i v e l y a s c r i b e d t o t h e m a s f o l l o w s : " C h a n g e o f u s e " m e a n s a n y c h a n g e i n t h e u s e o f a n e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g t h a t . r e s u l t s i n t h e i n c r e a s e o f v e h i c u l a r t r i p s . " D e v e l o p m e n t " m e a n s a n y a c t i v i t y w h i c h r e q u i r e s d i s c r e t i o n a r y o r m i n i s t e r i a l a c t i o n b y t h e C i t y r e s u l t i n g i n t h e i s s u a n c e o f g r a d i n g , b u i l d i n g , p l u m b i n g , m e c h a n i c a l o r e l e c t r i c a l p e r m i t s , o r c e r t i f i c a t e s o f o c c u p a n c y i s s u e d b y t h e C i t y t o c o n s t r u c t , o r c h a n g e t h e u s e o f , a b u i l d i n g o r p r o p e r t y . W h e r e " d e v e l o p m e n t " a p p l i e s t o a n e n l a r g e m e n t o f a n e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g , o r a c h a n g e o f u s e o f a n e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g t h a t r e s u l t s i n i n c r e a s e d v e h i c l e t r i p s , t h e a v e r a g e w e e k d a y t r i p s s h a l l b e o n l y t h e a d d i t i o n a l t r i p s i n e x c e s s o f t h o s e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e e x i s t i n g u s e . " F e e S t u d y " m e a n s t h e s t u d i e s p r e p a r e d b y C V A G a n d a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , w h i c h s u p p o r t s t h e f e e e s t a b l i s h e d b y t h i s c h a p t e r , a n d i n c l u d e s a l l t h e u n d e r l y i n g r e p o r t s a n d d o c u m e n t s r e f e r e n c e d t h e r e i n . " I m p a c t F e e S c h e d u l e " m e a n s t h e s c h e d u l e o f d e v e l o p m e n t i m p a c t f e e s a p p r o v e d b y r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l . " M i t i g a t i o n F e e A c t " m e a n s t h e l a w s e t f o r t h i n t h e C a l i f o r n i a G o v e r n m e n t C o d e ( G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 6 6 0 0 0 e t s e q . ) t h a t e s t a b l i s h e s t h e c r i t e r i a f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g a f e e a s a c o n d i t i o n o f a p p r o v a l o f a d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t . " R e g i o n a l S y s t e m " m e a n s t h e r e g i o n a l s y s t e m o f r o a d s , s t r e e t s a n d h i g h w a y s i d e n t i f i e d b y C V A G a s n e e d e d t o a c c o m m o d a t e g r o w t h i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y t o t h e y e a r 2 0 3 0 . " T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n T r u s t F u n d " m e a n s t h e f u n d e s t a b l i s h e d " p u r s u a n t t o t h i s c h a p t e r . 2 1 6 Ordinance No. 507 TUMF Adopted February 19, 2013 Page 5 of 9 "TUMF" means the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee established by this chapter. 3.33.030 Fee Established A. There is established a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF"), which shall apply to new development yet to receive final discretionary approval and/or issuance of a building permit or other development right and to any reconstruction or new use of existing buildings that results in change of use and generates additional vehicular trips. B. The facilities to be funded by the TUMF are detailed in the Fee Study, which is on file with the City's Public Works Department. C. The TUMF is in addition to the requirements imposed by other City laws, policies or regulations relating to the construction or the financing of the construction of public improvements within subdivisions or developments. 3.33.040 Fund Established A. There is established a Transportation Mitigation Trust Fund. ("Trust Fund") into which TUMF proceeds shall be deposited. B. TUMF proceeds shall be imposed and collected by the City and shall be transmitted to CVAG to be placed in the Trust Fund. All interest or other earnings of the Trust Fund shall be credited to the Trust Fund. C. CVAG shall administer the Trust Fund in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act. 3.33.050 Calculation and Collection of the TUMF A. The method of calculating the TUMF shall be described in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Handbook, a copy of which is on file with the City's Public Works Department. B. The amount of the fees due shall be the amount set forth in the applicable Impact Fee Schedule in effect at the time each fee is due. The TUMF shall be collected pursuant to the City's established procedures.for the collection of development impact fees. 217 " O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 T U M F A d o p t e d F e b r u a r y 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 P a g e 6 o f 9 3 . 3 3 . 0 6 0 U s e R e s t r i c t i o n s T U M F p r o c e e d s s h a l l b e s o l e l y u s e d f o r t h e e n g i n e e r i n g , c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d a c q u i s i t i o n o f r i g h t o f w a y f o r t h e R e g i o n a l S y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e F e e S t u d y a n d a n y o t h e r p u r p o s e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h i s c h a p t e r . T U M F p r o c e e d s s h a l l n o t b e u s e d f o r R e g i o n a l S y s t e m m a i n t e n a n c e . 3 . 3 3 . 0 7 0 E x e m p t i o n s a n d C r e d i t s A . T h e f o l l o w i n g d e v e l o p m e n t s a r e e x e m p t e d f r o m p a y m e n t ` o f t h e f e e r e q u i r e d b y t h i s ' c h a p t e r : 1 . L o w a n d l o w e r - i n c o m e r e s i d e n t i a l h o u s i n g , i n c l u d i n g s i n g l e - f a m i l y h o m e s , a p a r t m e n t s a n d m o b i l e h o m e s b u i l t f o r t h o s e w h o s e i n c o m e i s n o m o r e t h a n e i g h t y p e r c e n t o f t h e m e d i a n i n c o m e i n t h e S a n B e r n a r d i n o - R i v e r s i d e S t a n d a r d M e t r o p o l i t a n S t a t i s t i c a l A r e a a n d a s d e t e r m i n e d a n d a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o r i t s d e s i g n e e : T h e s a l e s o r r e n t a l p r i c e s h a l l n o t e x c e e d t h e a f f o r d a b i l i t y c r i t e r i a a s e s t a b l i s h e d u n d e r H U D S e c t i o n 8 g u i d e l i n e s . 2 . P u b l i c b u i l d i n g s , p u b l i c s c h o o l s a n d p u b l i c f a c i l i t i e s , u n l e s s p r i m a r i l y u s e d f o r l e a s e t o p r i v a t e , f o r - p r o f i t e n t e r p r i s e s . 3 . B u i l d i n g s u s e d f o r r e l i g i o u s p u r p o s e s b u t e x c l u d i n g o t h e r c o m m e r c i a l p r o p e r t i e s o r b u s i n e s s e s o w n e d b y a r e l i g i o u s i n s t i t u t i o n . 4 . T h e r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n y b u i l d i n g s o l o n g a s t h e r e c o n s t r u c t e d b u i l d i n g b o t h c o n t i n u e s a u s e o f t h e s a m e c a t e g o r y a s t h e p r i o r u s e , a n d g e n e r a t e s t h e s a m e o r f e w e r t r i p s a s t h e o r i g i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d r e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o m m e n c e s w i t h i n o n e y e a r f r o m d e s t r u c t i o n o f t h e b u i l d i n g . B . C r e d i t a g a i n s t t h e T U M F s h a l l b e g i v e n w h e r e a d e v e l o p e r i m p r o v e s s t r e e t s i n c l u d e d w i t h i n t h e R e g i o n a l S y s t e m b e y o n d t h e C i t y ' s r e q u i r e m e n t s e s t a b l i s h e d f o r o n - s i t e a n d o f f - s i t e i m p r o v e m e n t s i m p o s e d u p o n p r o j e c t s . T o r e c e i v e a c r e d i t , t h e d e v e l o p e r s h a l l o b t a i n i n a d v a n c e a n a g r e e m e n t w i t h C V A G p u r s u a n t t o C V A G ' s r u l e s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s . T h a t c r e d i t s h a l l b e a n a m o u n t e q u a l t o t h e a c t u a l e n g i n e e r i n g a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n c o s t s i n c u r r e d a t t h e t i m e o f t h e d e v e l o p m e n t t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t C V A G h a s i n c l u d e d t h o s e c o s t s i n . i t s e s t i m a t e d c o s t o f c o n s t r u c t i n g t h e R e g i o n a l S y s t e m . 2 1 8 Ordinance No. 507 TUMF Adopted February 19, 2013 Page 7 of 9 3.33.070 Appeal Procedures A. Any developer, who, because of the nature or type of uses proposed for a development project, contends that application of the TUMF is unconstitutional or unrelated to mitigation of the burdens of the development, may file a written appeal with the City within ninety days after imposition of the TUMF as a condition of approval or as otherwise provided by the Mitigation Fee Act. B. The appeal shall be heard by the CVAG Executive Committee in accordance with CVAG's established policies and procedures for conducting such matters. The decision of the Executive Committee shall be final. 3.33.080 Administrative Fee A. The City may impose an administrative fee in amount computed to cover the average cast to the City of processing the TUMF. The City shall establish such fee in accordance with the City's procedures for establishing service -related fees, B. The administrative fee authorized by this section shall be in addition to the fee imposed under Section 3.33.030. The administrative fee, when collected, shall be retained by the City to recover its costs. SECTION 2. SEVERABILiTY The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance be rendered. or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences -or words of this ordinance as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect sixty (60) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at feast three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to :be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. 219 " O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 0 7 T U M F A d o p t e d F e b r u a r y 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 P a g e 8 o f 9 P A S S E D , A P P R O V E D a n d A D O P T E D , a t a r e g u l a r m e e t i n g o f t h e L a Q u i n t a C i t y C o u n c i l h e l d t h i s 1 9 t d a y o f F e b r u a r y , 2 0 1 3 , b y t h e f o l l o w i n g v o t e : A Y E S : C o u n c i l M e m b e r s E v a n s , F r a n k l i n , H e n d e r s o n , O s b o r n e , M a y o r A d o l p h N O E S : N o n e A B S E N T : N o n e A B S T A I N : N o n e A T T E S T : S U S A N M A t ' S E L S , C i C l e r k C i t y o f t o Q u i n t a , C a l i f o r n i a ( C I T Y S E A L ) K A H E R I N E J E N ' O , C i t y A t t o r n e y C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a , C . " o r n i a A P P R O V E D A S T O r R I V I : , _ ��t 1 N A D O , P ���% o r C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a , C a l i f o r n i a 2 2 0 Ordinance No. 507 TUMF Adopted February 19, 2013 Page 9 of 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 507 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 5th day of February, 2013, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of February, 2013, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. further certify that. the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution No. 2006-115. SUSAN MAYSELS, pity CI City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta; California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on February 21, 2013, pursuant to Council Resolution. SUSAN NjAYSELS, ity Cle City of La Quinta, California 221 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF TUMF P ROGRAM This Agreement is made and entered into on FuartoAKI 5 , 2013 between the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG") and the City of La Quinta ("City"). Each of the parties to this agreement is a governmental entity empowered to enter into an Agreement of this type. This Agreement is made in reference to the following facts and circumstances: RECITALS On or about June 26, 1989, the City, in conjunction with other jurisdictions in the Coachella Valley, entered into an Implementation Agreement, authorizing CVAG to manage and administer the Regional Transportation Program for the Coachella Valley; On or about February 2, 2010, the City, in conjunction with those same jurisdictions in the Coachella Valley, extended the Implementation Agreement authorizing CVAG to continue to manage and administer the Regional Transportation Program for the Coachella Valley through calendar year 2038; Pursuant to the terms of the Implementation Agreement and as a condition to the receipt of its share of the local portion of Measure "A" funds, each city was required to adopt and maintain a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") to be administered by CVAG under the terms of the Implementation Agreement; The City had never adopted nor maintained a TUMF program, thereby forfeiting its share of the local portion of Measure "A"; The City now desires to establish the TUMF program within its jurisdiction so as to become eligible to receive its share of the local portion of Measure "A" funds; Now, therefore, in consideration of the following, the parties hereto do establish as follows: 1 222 1.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF TUMF 1.1 City shall adopt the Model TUMF Ordinance, to be effective on or about. April 22, 2013, or as soon thereafter as notice requirements may permit, and thereafter collect all TUMF provided therefor consistent with the Ordinance, Implementation Agreement and all applicable CVAG policies. 1.2 City. and CVAG agree that the estimated TUMF, plus shortfalls, . discrepancies and interest due to CVAG as calculated through June 30, 2012 is $5,528,997 (collectively the estimated "TUMF Shortfall"). City and CVAG agree the "TUMF Shortfall" will be recalculated as of the date the TUMF is in full effect at the City of La Quinta and payment of the recalculated "TUMF Shortfall" amount will be a condition of allowing City to become established in the TUMF Program. 1.3 Interest on the TUMF Shortfall shall accrue at the rate for the Local Agency Investment Fund ("LAIF"), as determined on July -1st of each year. Said interest shall accrue on the balance of the unpaid TUMF Shortfall until the entire amount due, including interest, is fully paid. 1.4 City agrees that CVAG shall apply fifty percent (50%) of City's share of local Measure "A" funds toward the TUMF Shortfall, including interest accruing thereon, until such time as all such sums have been paid in full. At the City's option, the City may choose at some point to pay the outstanding TUMF Shortfall in a lump sum and thereby avoid the requirement to pay interest on the outstanding amount. 1.5 Until such time as the TUMF Shortfall, including interest thereon, is repaid by the City to the TUMF program, CVAG shall retain 50% of the City's share of the local portion of Measure "A" funds, apply the retained monies toward the sums owing hereunder, and forward to the City only the remaining 50% of the City's share of local Measure "A" funds. 1.6 City agrees to collect and transmit to CVAG all TUMF assessed in accordance with the terms of the Implementation Agreement, the adopted Model TUMF ordinance, and applicable CVAG policy. 1.7 City agrees to allow an annual audit of its TUMF program as required in the case of all cities participating in the TUMF program. Upon successful and continued compliance with the terms of this Agreement, City shall be entitled to: participate in the 2 • 223 " T U M F p r o g r a m i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e t e r m s o f t h e a d o p t e d T U M F O r d i n a n c e , t h e I m p l e m e n t a t i o n A g r e e m e n t a n d a l l a p p l i c a b l e C V A G p o l i c i e s . 1 . 8 C V A G s h a l l p r o v i d e C i t y w i t h a m o n t h l y a c c o u n t i n g o f l o c a l M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s a p p l i e d t o t h e a m o u n t d u e C V A G f r o m t h e C i t y p u r s u a n t t o t h e t e r m s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t 2 . 0 P E R I O D O F A G R E E M E N T 2 . 1 . T h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l c o n t i n u e i n e f f e c t u n t i l s u c h t i m e a s t h e C i t y h a s r e p a i d t h e e n t i r e T U M F S h o r t f a l l , t o g e t h e r w i t h i n t e r e s t a c c r u i n g t h e r e o n , a s s e t f o r t h a b o v e . 3 . 0 C O N F L I C T I N G P R O V I S I O N S 3 . 1 I n t h e e v e n t t h a t p r o v i s i o n s o f a n y e x h i b i t c o n f l i c t i n a n y w a y w i t h t h e p r o v i s i o n s s e t f o r t h i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t , t h e l a n g u a g e , t e r m s a n d A g r e e m e n t s h a l l c o n t r o l t h e a c t i o n s a n d i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e p a r t i e s ' u n d e r s t a n d i n g s e r v i c e s . 4 . 0 . A M E N D M E N T c o n d i t i o n s c o n t a i n e d i n t h i s o b l i g a t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g o f t h e p a r t i e s a n d t h e t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e 4 . 1 . I n t h e e v e n t t h a t t h e p a r t i e s d e t e r m i n e t h a t t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h o u l d b e a l t e r e d , t h e p a r t i e s s h a l l e x e c u t e a c o n t r a c t a m e n d m e n t t o a d d a n y p r o v i s i o n t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t , o r d e l e t e o r a m e n d a n y p r o v i s i o n o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . A l l s u c h a m e n d m e n t s m u s t b e i n t h e f o r m o f a w r i t t e n i n s t r u m e n t s i g n e d b y t h e o r i g i n a l s i g n a t o r i e s t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t , o r t h e i r s u c c e s s o r s o r d e s i g n e e s . 5 . 0 . A T T O R N E Y S ' F E E S 5 . 1 . I f e i t h e r p a r t y c o m m e n c e s a n a c t i o n a g a i n s t t h e o t h e r p a r t y a r i s i n g o u t o f o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h i s A g r e e m e n t , t h e p r e v a i l i n g p a r t y i n s u c h l i t i g a t i o n s h a l l b e e n t i t l e d t o h a v e a n d r e c o v e r f r o m t h e l o s i n g p a r t y r e a s o n a b l e a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s a n d c o s t s o f s u i t . 2 2 4 6.0 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS 6.1 All of the obligations performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with and in full compliance of all applicable federal, state a n d local statutes, rules and regulations. 7.0 NOTIFICATION 7.1 All notices hereunder and communications with respect to this Agreement shall be effective upon the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, and postage prepaid to the persons named below: If to CVAG: If to La Quinta: 8.0 GOVERNING LAW Tom Kirk, Executive Director Coachella Valley Association of Governments 73-710 Fred Waring Dr., Ste: 200 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 8.1 This Agreement shall be binding on and shall be for the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, and shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 9.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT 9.1 This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the subject `hereof. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, 225 representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their respective officersthereunto duly authorized on the day and year first mentioned above: COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS By: OACOV1/4-1-J Jose • e Conmck CVAG Chairman Approved as to form: By: oni Eggebraaten CVAG General Counsel CITY OF LA QUINTA Bv: Don Adolph Mayor Approved as to fo m: B City Att enson 226. " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : C i t i z e n s A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e / S o c i a l S e r v i c e s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l J o s e f i n a C l e m e n t e , T r a n s i t M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 - F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 5 / 1 6 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n s C I T I Z E N S A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E / S O C I A L S E R V I C E S T R A N S P O R T A T I O N A D V I S O R Y C O U N C I L A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v e , i n c o n c e p t , t h e F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 - F Y 2 0 1 5 / 1 6 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n s ( S R T P s ) f o r t h e c i t i e s o f B a n n i n g , B e a u m o n t , C o r o n a , R i v e r s i d e , P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( P V V T A ) , R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( R T A ) , S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( S u n L i n e ) , a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l P r o g r a m , a s p r e s e n t e d . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : A s p a r t o f t h e s t a t e w i d e p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o g r a m , t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s t a s k e d w i t h t h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y t o i d e n t i f y , a n a l y z e , a n d r e c o m m e n d p o t e n t i a l p r o d u c t i v i t y i m p r o v e m e n t s t o e n s u r e f e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d l o c a l f u n d s a l l o c a t e d t o t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s p r o v i d e s e r v i c e s n e e d e d b y c o u n t y r e s i d e n t s a n d a r e u s e d i n a n e f f i c i e n t a n d e f f e c t i v e m a n n e r . T h r o u g h t h e S R T P p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t r a n s i t a g e n c i e s d e t e r m i n e t h e t r a n s i t n e e d s o f t h e c o m m u n i t y , a n a l y z e c u r r e n t t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e s a n d t h e i r a b i l i t y t o m e e t t h o s e n e e d s , a n d r e c o m m e n d s e r v i c e a n d o r g a n i z a t i o n a l i n i t i a t i v e s a i m e d a t i m p r o v i n g s e r v i c e d e l i v e r y a n d m e e t i n g i d e n t i f i e d u n m e t n e e d s , o v e r a t h r e e - y e a r t i m e f r a m e . T h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 - F Y 2 0 1 5 / 1 6 S R T P s a r e c o m p r i s e d o f p l a n s t h a t c o v e r t h e c o u n t y a p p o r t i o n m e n t a r e a s o f W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e , C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y , a n d P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y . T h e p l a n s a r e d e v e l o p e d t o m e e t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s P r o d u c t i v i t y I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( P I P ) , w h i c h w a s a d o p t e d a s p a r t o f a c o m p r e h e n s i v e e f f o r t w i t h t h e c o u n t y ' s p u b l i c t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s t o m a i n t a i n f i n a n c i a l l y s u s t a i n a b l e t r a n s i t s y s t e m s . T h e S R T P p r o c e s s a l s o r e q u i r e s t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s a d d r e s s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s t h a t a r e m a d e b y r e g u l a r p e r f o r m a n c e a u d i t s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e S R T P i s u s e d a s d o c u m e n t a t i o n t o s u p p o r t p r o j e c t s i n c l u d e d i n t h e r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n p r e p a r e d b y t h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a A s s o c i a t i o n o f A g e n d a I t e m 9 M 2 2 7 Governments, the region's metropolitan planning organization, which also serves as the primary justification for receipts of federal grants for transit operations and capital projects. The state's economic outlook for FY 2013/14 remains optimistic but slightly dampened by possible delay of this year's projected federal revenues due to the ongoing dispute between the Department of Labor (DOL) and state of California regarding the implementation of the Public Employee Pension Reform Act and Section 13(c) of the Federal Transit Act. Until this is resolved, the DOL is continuing its practice of withholding certification of federal transit grant funds to state of California grantees at the request of Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). There has been no indication to date the ATU or DOL will allow transit agencies to receive certification of their federal operating grant to fund the remainder of FY 2012/13 operations. As a result, the current RTA and SunLine financial plans are prepared to absorb the impact of the current disruption. To meet the growing demand for transit services, the operators are focusing on purchasing the needed vehicles for replacement of aging buses and other capital equipment programmed and fully funded in previous years. The operators are also furthering efforts to develop and assess marketing plans to continue and introduce new transit options and alternatives to serve the growing transit users in the county as well as improve necessary access and mobility for the large segment of the county's disabled, elderly, and low-income populations. This annual update aims to continue evaluating current transit service and performance measures to keep up with increasing travel demand within the region.. Staff is requesting the SRTPs be approved in concept only, as requests for financial allocations will be made at the July Commission meeting. City of Banning The city of Banning (Banning) works closely with the city of Beaumont (Beaumont) to provide a seamless transit system for the residents of Banning, Beaumont, and the unincorporated areas of Cabazon, Cherry Valley, and the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians reservation. Planned services for FY 2013/14 include: • A comprehensive operational analysis (COA) of both Banning and Beaumont will be conducted by Transportation Management Design Inc.; • Purchase one fixed route coach and one ADA accessible van for expansion; • Install additional bus stops signs along Routes 1, 5, and 6 to reduce number of flag stops; • • Agenda Item 9M 228 " C l o s e l y m o n i t o r s e r v i c e t o t h e M t . S a n J a c i n t o C o l l e g e c a m p u s a n d t h e C a b a z o n E v e n i n g E x p r e s s a n d a d d r e s s n e e d s a s n e c e s s a r y ; a n d " C o n t i n u e w o r k i n g w i t h B e a u m o n t o n r o u t e s , s c h e d u l e s , p a s s e n g e r f a r e s , a n d a m e n i t i e s t o p r o v i d e s e a m l e s s t r a n s i t s e r v i c e i n t h e P a s s a r e a . C i t y o f B e a u m o n t B e a u m o n t t r a n s i t p r o v i d e s b o t h d i a l - a - r i d e a n d f i x e d r o u t e s e r v i c e s a n d w o r k s c l o s e l y w i t h B a n n i n g t o p r o v i d e a s e a m l e s s t r a n s i t s y s t e m i n t h e P a s s a r e a . P l a n n e d s e r v i c e s f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 i n c l u d e : " C o m p l e t e a C O A s t u d y i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h B a n n i n g , R T A , a n d S u n L i n e ; " I m p l e m e n t m i n o r r o u t e c h a n g e s t o e x i s t i n g r o u t e s b y a d d i n g b u s e s d u r i n g p e a k t i m e s ; " I n c r e a s e s e r v i c e r e g i o n a l l y t o S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y ; " I n s t a l l m o r e b u s s h e l t e r s a n d b u s b e n c h e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e s e r v i c e a r e a ; " D e v e l o p a n d p r i n t a s y s t e m w i d e m a p s h o w i n g B a n n i n g a n d B e a u m o n t r o u t e s ; a n d " C o n t i n u e c o l l a b o r a t i v e e f f o r t s w i t h B a n n i n g t o i m p r o v e c o o r d i n a t i o n o f r o u t e s , s c h e d u l e s , p a s s e n g e r f a r e s , a n d a m e n i t i e s f o r s e a m l e s s t r a n s i t s e r v i c e i n t h e P a s s a r e a . " C i t y o f C o r o n a " T h e c i t y o f C o r o n a ( C o r o n a ) o p e r a t e s a f i x e d r o u t e s y s t e m k n o w n a s t h e C o r o n a C r u i s e r a n d a g e n e r a l p u b l i c d i a l - a - r i d e p r o g r a m . C o r o n a c l o s e l y c o o r d i n a t e s a l l t r a n s f e r s w i t h b o t h R T A a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l s e r v i c e s . P l a n n e d s e r v i c e s f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 i n c l u d e : " P u r c h a s e o n e e x p a n s i o n a n d f i v e r e p l a c e m e n t C o r o n a C r u i s e r b u s e s ; " I n s t a l l a n e w l a n d m o b i l e - b a s e d c o m m u n i c a t i o n s y s t e m ; " I m p l e m e n t p h a s e o n e o f a m u l t i - y e a r e f f o r t t o e n h a n c e a c c e s s i b i l i t y o f C o r o n a C r u i s e r b u s s t o p s ; " C o m p l e t e a c o m p e t i t i v e b i d p r o c e s s t o s e l e c t t h e b e s t q u a l i f i e d c o n t r a c t o r t o o p e r a t e t h e c i t y t r a n s i t s e r v i c e a n d c o n t i n u e o p e r a t i o n b e g i n n i n g A u g u s t 2 0 1 3 ; a n d " C o n t i n u e w o r k w i t h t h e C o r o n a - N o r c o U n i f i e d S c h o o l D i s t r i c t i n i d e n t i f y i n g t i m e s a n d l o c a t i o n s w h e r e t o t r a n s p o r t s t u d e n t s d u e t o c o n t i n u i n g c o n s t r a i n t s o n s c h o o l b u s i n g . C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e S p e c i a l S e r v i c e s R i v e r s i d e S p e c i a l S e r v i c e s ( R S S ) o p e r a t e s a 2 4 - h o u r a d v a n c e r e s e r v a t i o n d i a l - a - r i d e f o r s e n i o r s a n d p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s w i t h i n t h e R i v e r s i d e c i t y l i m i t s . T h e A g e n d a I t e m 9 M 2 2 9 program serves as an alternative to RTA's transit service for seniors and persons with disabilities unable to use fixed route service. Planned services for FY 2013/14 include: • Install five additional slow fill stations at the Riverside Corporation Yard in FY 2013/14 to meet fueling demand; • Place in service eight new paratransit vehicles for replacement to be delivered by June 2013; • The new compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicle maintenance facility will be operational starting. July 2013. The facility includes six bays, an office, and a large storage area for parts and equipment; • Currently working on the design plan to expand and modernize the operations facility to include a larger dispatch center and a separate conference room; and • Continue marketing efforts by installing advertisements of city transit services on the back windows of agency minibuses. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency The-PVVTA provides fixed route and a transportation reimbursement program for individuals who cannot ride the public bus system. The fixed route can deviate up to three-quarters of a mile away from the actual fixed route. Service is provided within the city of Blythe and surrounding unincorporated county areas in the Palo Verde Valley. Planned services for FY 2013/14 include: • The mobility management project is anticipated to renew current agreement with Ca!trans to extend program until 2014; • Current fare structure will be maintained for FY 2013/14 with a possibility of modest increase in FY 2014/15; • Construction and upgrade installation for the new transit facility will be completed in FY 2013/14; • Continue to implement the PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride, a demand response service to address special times when community events require general public service that are not available on the existing fixed route system; and • Run existing services for Routes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 with minor changes in frequency to unproductive areas. Riverside Transit Agency RTA provides local, intercity, and regional transportation services. As the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) for Western Riverside County, RTA is responsible for coordinating transit services throughout the service area, providing driver training and grant applications assistance to operators in Western County. Planned services for FY 2013/14 include • • • Agenda Item 9M 230 " " " A C O A s t u d y w i l l b e c o m p l e t e d i n 2 0 1 4 a n d s e r v e a s a b l u e p r i n t o f s e r v i c e i m p r o v e m e n t s f o r t h e n e x t f i v e y e a r s ; " P r o p o s e d s e r v i c e c h a n g e s i n c l u d e l a t e r s e r v i c e o n m a j o r r o u t e s s e r v i n g c o l l e g e s a n d u n i v e r s i t i e s a n d r e i n s t a t e m e n t o f t h r e e h o l i d a y s ( M e m o r i a l D a y , I n d e p e n d e n c e D a y , a n d L a b o r D a y ) ; " C o n t i n u e r e f i n i n g e x i s t i n g s e r v i c e t h r o u g h i m p r o v e d s c h e d u l i n g , s t r e a m l i n i n g , a n d b e t t e r s e r v i n g c o m m u n i t i e s w i t h t h e a v a i l a b l e r e s o u r c e s ; a n d " I n c r e a s e o p e r a t i n g b u d g e t b y a p p r o x i m a t e l y 5 . 4 p e r c e n t o v e r t h e F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 b u d g e t . S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y S u n L i n e i s t h e C T S A f o r C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y a n d i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r c o o r d i n a t i n g t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s i n t h e v a l l e y , w h i c h c o v e r s a s e r v i c e a r e a o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 , 1 2 0 s q u a r e m i l e s . S u n L i n e p r o v i d e s b o t h l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e s w i t h 1 3 f i x e d r o u t e s a n d d e m a n d r e s p o n s e d i a l - a - r i d e s e r v i c e s k n o w n a s S u n D i a l . P l a n n e d s e r v i c e s f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 i n c l u d e : " C o m p l e t e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d o c c u p y t h e n e w a d m i n i s t r a t i v e b u i l d i n g p r o j e c t a t T h o u s a n d P a l m s ; " I m p l e m e n t t h e n e w I n d i o - P a l m D e s e r t a n d N o r t h S h o r e - I n d i o b u s s e r v i c e s ; " I m p l e m e n t r o u t e i m p r o v e m e n t s t o L i n e s 1 4 , 1 5 , 2 4 , 3 0 , 3 2 , 5 3 , 7 0 , 9 0 , 9 1 , a n d 1 1 1 ; " C o n t i n u e t h e T a x i V o u c h e r p r o g r a m i n C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y a n d t h e R i v e r s i d e C o m m u t e r L i n k 2 2 0 e x p r e s s b u s s e r v i c e ; a n d " P r o c u r e a d d i t i o n a l b u s s h e l t e r s a n d c o n t i n u e w o r k i n g w i t h l o c a l j u r i s d i c t i o n s o n b u s s t o p i m p r o v e m e n t s . C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l P r o g r a m T h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a R e g i o n a l R a i l A u t h o r i t y o p e r a t e s s e v e n c o m m u t e r r a i l l i n e s w i t h 5 2 l o c o m o t i v e s a n d 1 5 0 c o m m u t e r r a i l c a r s . T h r e e r o u t e s - R i v e r s i d e t o L o s A n g e l e s L i n e , I n l a n d E m p i r e t o O r a n g e C o u n t y L i n e , a n d R i v e r s i d e t o L o s A n g e l e s v i a F u l l e r t o n L i n e ( 9 1 L i n e ) - d i r e c t l y s e r v e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w i t h c o n n e c t i n g s e r v i c e a v a i l a b l e t o d e s t i n a t i o n s o n t h e o t h e r f o u r l i n e s . P l a n n e d s e r v i c e s f o r F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 i n c l u d e : " P o t e n t i a l i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f 5 p e r c e n t + f a r e i n c r e a s e ; " B e g i n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e M e t r o l i n k e x t e n s i o n ; " $ 1 m i l l i o n c o s t i n c r e a s e d u e t o i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f p o s i t i v e t r a i n c o n t r o l ; " P o t e n t i a l s e r v i c e i n c r e a s e o n 9 1 L i n e ; a n d " S u p p o r t d e v e l o p m e n t o f C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y c o m m u t e r r a i l f a c i l i t i e s . A g e n d a I t e m 9 M 2 3 1 Attachments: FY 2013/14 — FY 2015/16 Operator SRTPs (Posted on Commission Website) 1) City of Banning 2) City of Beaumont 3) City of Corona 4) City of Riverside 5) PVVTA 6) RTA 7) SunLine 8) Commuter Rail Program Agenda Item 9M 232 PASSTRANSIT BANNING TRANSIT SYSTEM FY 2013/14-2015/16 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Proud History Prosperous Tomorrow Pass Transit is a cooperative effort between the City of Banning and the City of Beaumont DRAFT JUNE 12, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 3 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service, Regional Express Bus Service 4 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure 7 1.5 Revenue Fleet 7 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities 8 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Analysis 8 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance 9 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 9 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts 10 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next Two Years 11 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 11 CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes 11 3.2 Marketing Plans and Promotions 11 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 12 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program 12 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 12 TABLES Table 1 - Fleet Inventory 14 Table 2 - SRTP Service Summary 15 Table 2A - Excluded Routes 20 Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics 21 Table 3A - Individual Route Description 22 Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 24 Table 4A - Capital Project Justification 25 Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2014/15 27 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2015/16 27 Table 6 - FY 2009 Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations 29 Table 7 - Service Provider Performance Target Report Year to Date 30 Table 8 - FY 12/13 SRTP Performance Report 31 Table 9 - Highlights of Short Range Transit Plan 32 Table 9A - Operating & Financial Data 32 Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation 33 INTRODUCTION Banning Transit System began as one intercity fixed route in April 1973, and then expanded to two routes in September 1985. Fixed route service to Cabazon and the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians Reservation began in July 1995, as the system's third route. Banning Dial -A -Ride service for seniors and persons with disabilities began in October 1985. Pass Transit is a combined effort between Banning Transit System and Beaumont Transit System started in November 2004. Routes 1 and 2 were modified from the previous Banning Transit System Cabazon Route and Beaumont Transit System Route 1. Banning's Northern Route was renumbered Route 5 and Banning's Southern Route was renumbered Route 6. Beaumont's existing Routes 3 and 4 remained the same. A Memorandum of Understanding was developed to allow each city's Dial -A -Ride services to cross jurisdictional boundary lines so that a passenger did not have to transfer. A new joint Rider's Guide was developed, combined transfers and ten -ride ticket books were printed, buses and bus stop signs were decaled `Pass Transit' and fares were established to be the same for the convenience of riders The Banning Transit System functions as a department within the City and is managed by and under the direction of the Community Services Director. The City of Banning Transit Department employs a Lead Bus Driver/Trainer, five full-time bus drivers, five part-time bus drivers, two part-time Dial -A -Ride drivers, 1.5 Full-time equivalent Office Specialists and one full-time Equipment Mechanic. CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area The Banning Pass Transit serves the commercial and residential areas of Banning and residential and commercial areas in Cabazon with additional service to limited commercial areas in Beaumont. Transit service was implemented in Banning in April 1973. The Banning Dial -A -Ride service was implemented in Banning in October 1985. The Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride services the entire city limits of Banning and provides service to areas of Beaumont and Cabazon within % mile of the fixed route bus service. 1 Q G 10Ih St ill' Sir 7 N Sl To 1SI S166 'IA SI ? Wal Mart Hewer Hd Indian School Bannin g Community q' & Sensor ca Centers Niro1el SI Williams St Lincoln SI Q o L A Haller St t Q' m E 6 g o ro ro ▪ to BEAUMONT CS Transfer to: RTA 31:erring Hemet RTA 36 serving Yucaipa and Calimesa, [omens m 6mnitrans service. RTA 35 serving Moreno 5/Ilk/ high! Sun LakesBlvd Sun Lakes Vilrige Weslward Av Banning High School Banning 1 Airnmt * BANNING 2 Wesley SI b y CABAZQN c oh non Outlet Mall Gismo orongo "gl;gat8 or Carmen Av Q , Cabo=on Caatuer y � Centr a '■ 0 m Esperanm Av Idak 2 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections The residential population within the Banning Transit System's service area has grown approximately 29% since 2000. Per the 2010 census there were 29,603 people. Population density was 1,281.57 people per square mile. There were 12,144 housing units at an average density of 423/sq. mile. The racial makeup of the city was 64.74% White, 41.15% Hispanic or Latino of any race, 8.55% African -American, 2.30% Native American, 5.23% Asian, 15.55% from other races (one race), and 4.87% from two or more races. Of the 10,838 households, 22.4% had children under the age of 18. 47.11 % were married couples living together and 23.70% were non -families. 28.53% of all households were made up of individuals and 18.4% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.61 and the average family size was 3.19. The city's population under 19 years of age was 25.78, 17.48% was 20 to 34 years old, 20.43 was 25 to 44 years of age, 21.57% was 45 to 64 years old, and 25.88% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 42.30. Data from a 2011 Pass Area Transit Study reported that female riders outnumbered males nearly 2 to 1. Interestingly, the highest amount of passengers reported were between the ages of 20-29, the age group which is the lowest percentage of Banning residents. Ridership ethnicity closely parallels the population ethnicity in the City of Banning. • Caucasian Riders - 47% • Hispanic Riders - 34% • African American Riders - 12% • Asian Riders - 1 • Riders - 2% • Others - 4% The surveys further showed that 86% of the system's fixed route ridership use transit services at least three times a week, 59% of the ridership use transit services for local trips within the Banning/Beaumont/Cabazon area, 49% use transit for travel outside of the local service areas, and 91 % of the system's ridership do not have access to a car. Respondents also indicated that transit services are readily available with the majority of riders living within 2 blocks or less to a bus stop. Eighty-seven percent of the rider households speak English as their primary language and 13% speak Spanish as their primary language. 3 It would appear that the majority of regular Banning Transit System riders counted in the above percentages share the commonality of either being underemployed or unemployed, with 88% of riders reporting annual household incomes of $20,000 or less and 81 % reporting a household size greater than two. 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service, Regional Express Bus Service The Banning Pass Transit System offers three routes, Routes 1, 5, and 6 as well as a Dial -A -Ride Service. Routes 5 and 6 operate on a 75 minute headway. The routes headways increased due to increased congestion and multiple stops being made. The prior 60 minute headway caused routes to operate late. Routes 1 and 2 (Route 2 provides the Beaumont Transit System's Cabazon service) complement each other throughout the commercial areas of Beaumont, Banning, Cabazon, and the Morongo commercial development, with both Routes 1 and 2 operating every two hours. Route 1 is the only service that travels into eastern Cabazon, whereas Route 2 is the only service that travels into northeastern Beaumont. Approximately 75% of Routes 1 and 2 duplicate each other with a one hour frequency along the main corridor. Pass Transit service into Cabazon is the result of a memorandum of understanding between RTA and the City of Banning in an effort to reduce duplicative transit service in the Pass Area and to satisfy an unmet transit need at the time. In November of 2012, Route 1 began operating extended service and now operates until 11 pm Monday — Friday. All routes are continually monitored and will be modified as needed to better serve unmet transit needs. A summary of Pass Transit routes operated by Banning Transit System are shown below: Route 1 - Beaumont/Banning/Cabazon This route operates on a two-hour headway and is complemented by an overlap with Route 2 (Beaumont Pass Transit) along 75% of the route. Route 1 is the only service to the remote Esperanza & Elm area of southeastern Cabazon. The route also provides service to the residential areas of Cabazon, James Venable Cabazon Community Center, Casino Morongo, Desert Hills Premium Outlets and Cabazon Outlets, the commercial areas along Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue in Banning, and the commercial areas along 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue in Beaumont. Cabazon Evening Express — Banning/Cabazon The Evening Express Route began service in November of 2012 and offers service from Banning to Cabazon between the hours of 7:OOpm and 10:30pm and operates on a 65 minute headway. This route was developed in response to 4 a direct need for transportation from employees at both Casino Morongo and Desert Hills Shopping Center. The route makes limited stops and differs from the Route 1 in that it does not travel into the residential area of Cabazon or into Beaumont. Route 5 — Northern Banning This route operates on a 75 minute headway and provides service to the residential areas of the City of Banning that lie north of the 1-10 freeway, Nicolet Middle School, Hoffer Elementary School, Banning Public Library, Coombs Intermediate School, Hemmerling Elementary School and the commercial areas along Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue. Route 6 — Southern Banning The route operates on a 75 minute headway and provides service to the residential areas south of the 1-10 freeway, a small residential section north of Ramsey Street at the east end of the City of Banning, the commercial areas along Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue, Banning High School, Smith Correctional Facility, apartment complexes in the south, and the Banning Municipal Airport. Banning Pass Transit fixed route service hours are: Monday — Friday Extended Service to Cabazon Saturday & Sunday 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. to 10:45 p.m. 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The Banning Transit System Pass Transit provides service hours from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on the following holidays: Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday, President's Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, and the day after Thanksgiving Day. No service is provided on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride provides service to seniors (60+), persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for complementary Para transit service under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Call Center hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and voice mail can be left anytime and will be responded to as soon as possible. Service hours for Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride are (next page): 5 Seniors (age 60 & older) and persons with disabilities without ADA certification Monday — Friday 8:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m. Saturday & Sunday No Service Persons with ADA Complementary Para transit Certification Monday — Friday 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday & SundayService provided only if three (3) or more persons request service Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride provides service hours to ADA Certified passengers only from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday — Friday and on the following holidays: Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday, President's Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, and the day after Thanksgiving Day. No service is provided on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride is provided within the entire city limits of Banning and Beaumont and within a % mile boundary of the Routes 1 and 2 service areas in Cabazon. The City of Banning provides the ADA certification for Pass Transit Dial -A - Ride services operated by the City of Banning. The primary uses of Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride are for transportation to medical appointments, workshop programs for persons with disabilities, shopping areas, employment, and include connections to Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and Pass Transit fixed routes. Through a cooperative memorandum of understanding, Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride operated by the Beaumont Transit system will provide its residents with service in Banning and within a % mile boundary of Route 2 in Cabazon. Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride operated by the Banning Transit System will provide its residents with service in the city limits of Beaumont (excluding Cherry Valley). Regional Bus Service Pass Transit passengers can use Day Passes to transfer between the Pass Transit System fixed routes and the RTA Line 31 to Hemet and Line 35 to Moreno Valley. The RTA 210 and the newly introduced Sunline Commuter Line 220 provides service to and from Riverside to Palm Desert, offering stops in the Pass area. This new service was created to help connect the eastern desert region to the City of Riverside while providing service to and from the Banning/Beaumont area as well. Greyhound Lines, Inc. through their Crucero subsidiary provides intercity bus service between Los Angeles, Banning, Palm Springs, Imperial County, and Mexicali four times each day. Caltrans Division of Rail, through Amtrak operates Amtrak California Thruway bus service between Indio, Casino Morongo and Bakersfield with connections to Amtrak California San Joaquin to Oakland or Sacramento via Central Valley cities. 6 1.4 Fare Structure The fare structure was adjusted in April 2012 for the Pass Transit System. Currently, the fixed route fare is $1.15/one way trip for general fare passengers. Fares for senior citizens age 60 years and older and persons with disabilities is $.65/one-way trip. A zone fare of $.25 exists for persons traveling between Banning/Beaumont and Cabazon/Morongo service areas. (The route is twice the length of any other route in the system. The zone fare helps to recover operating costs for travel beyond the City limits.) Passengers under 46" in height pay $.25. Ten -ride ticket books are offered for $10.35 each; senior citizens and persons with disabilities can purchase Ten -Ride ticket books at a reduced cost of $5.85 per ten -ride book. Day passes are sold for $3.00 each; senior citizens and persons with disabilities can purchase the passes for $1.80. General fare monthly passes are $36.00, Senior/Disabled monthly passes are offered at $21.50 and monthly passes for students are $25.00. 1.5 Revenue Fleet Banning Transit System operates six fixed route vehicles (three in revenue service and three as spares), all of which are powered by compressed natural gas (CNG). The vehicles are equipped with bicycle racks for two bicycles and are in compliance with the ADA with mobility device lifts and two tie -down stations per bus. The transit system also operates three Dial -A -Ride vehicles (two in revenue service and one as a spare) that are gasoline powered and in compliance with the ADA, with mobility device lifts and tie - down stations for four mobility devices. Banning Pass Transit also has four support vehicles that are used for driver relief or administrative errands. The City adheres to California Highway Patrol (CHP) mandated Preventive Maintenance Inspection criteria and is very proactive in maintenance efforts. The predicted replacement level for fixed route service buses is every 10 years. Currently, there are six fixed route buses of which three are in revenue service and two are rotation buses. A replacement bus for the fixed route will be needed in FY 2013/14. The Dial -A -Ride buses should be replaced at 150,000 miles. Currently, there are five Dial -a -Ride buses (two in revenue service and three as spares). See the City of Banning Fleet Inventory Table 1 for individual vehicle characteristics. 7 The following two pictures show a fixed route and a dial -a -ride vehicle: F SSTRANSIT 23D 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities Banning Transit System functions as a department within the City and utilizes existing facilities. Transit Administrative staff is housed at the City's Community Center located at 789 North San Gorgonio Avenue, where bus passes are sold, schedules are available and all ADA applications are processed. Dispatch and general telephone information is also provided at the transit office within the Community Center. Banning Transit Office Hours: Monday — Thursday 8:00am to 6:00pm Friday 8:00am to 3:00pm The maintenance, parking, fueling of the buses, and storage of bus stop amenities are performed at the City's Corporation Yard located at 176 East Lincoln Street. Maintenance of the vehicles is performed by the Public Works Department, Fleet Maintenance Division. There are currently no plans to expand Banning Pass Transit System facilities. CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service A summary of Pass Transit route performance operated by Banning Transit System is shown below: Route 1 The passengers for this route have increased by 4% from FY 10/11 to FY 11/12 (3rd quarter comparable). In FY 12/13 (up to 3rd quarter) passengers have already increased by 15% compared to FY 11/12. 8 Route 5 The passengers for this route have decreased by -1 % from FY 10/11 to FY 11/12 (3rd quarter comparable). In FY 12/13 (up to 3rd quarter) passengers have already increased by 7% compared to FY 11/12. Route 6 The passengers for this route have decreased by -7/0 from FY 10/11 to FY 11/12 (3rd quarter comparable). In FY 12/13 (up to 3rd quarter) passengers have already increased by 8% compared to FY 11/12. 2.2 Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride provides service to seniors (60+), persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for complementary Para transit service under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Call Center hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and voice mail can be left anytime and will be responded to as soon as possible. DAR The passengers for this route have increased by 8% from FY 10/11 to FY 11/12 (3rd quarter comparable). In FY 12/13 (up to 3rd quarter) passengers have already increased by 2% compared to FY 11/12 2.3 Key Performance Indicators The Riverside County Transportation Commission has adopted a Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) for the transit and commuter rail operators of Riverside County. The PIP sets forth efficiency and effectiveness standards that the transit operators are to meet. Progress towards these standards is reported quarterly to the Commission Below are tables of the operating performance indicators adopted in the PIP and this plan's projections for the coming year. 9 Banning Transit System/Pass Transit Performance Measures Banning Transit System / Pass Transit FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Audited Actual Projected Planned (Based on 3`d Quarter Actuals) Performance Statistics Unlinked Passenger Trips 128,244 136,563 108,862 169,724 Operating Cost per Revenue $92.64 $86.53 $78.08 $80.00 Hours Fare box Recovery Ratio 9.90% 11.44% 11.89% 11.69% Subsidy per Passenger $8.71 $7.50 $6.89 $6.73 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.41 $2.94 $2.70 $2.66 Subsidy per Revenue Hour $83.47 $76.63 $68.79 $70.65 Subsidy per Revenue Mile $5.18 $3.46 $2.91 $4.55 Passengers per Revenue Hour 9.6 10.2 10.00 10.50 Passengers per Revenue Mile 0.60 0.46 0.42 0.68 The FY 2013/14 projections are based on operating data through March 2013, projected through June, 2013. Since these are only estimates, the performance indicators are subject to change. For Fiscal Year 2013/14, the Banning Transit System expects to be in compliance with at least 4 of the 7 performance targets. Additional details on key indicators for demand responsive and fixed route service are shown in Table 2. The Banning Transit System does not receive any federal funding and is not required to report to the National Transit Database. 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts In order to meet performance standards, staff will continue to monitor and analyze all routes to make sure that service is warranted and will eliminate unproductive service areas. Banning Pass Transit is currently in the process of contracting with Transportation Management & Design, Inc. for the purpose of having a Comprehensive Operations Analysis completed. This project is anticipated to be done concurrently with Beaumont Pass Transit and will provide recommendations for enhanced efficiency for each respective system as well as the system as a whole. 10 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next Two Years Major passenger trip destinations that the Banning Pass Transit services are the Kmart Shopping Center, the 2nd Street Marketplace in Beaumont, the Wal-Mart Supercenter in Beaumont, the Fox Cinema in Banning, the Cabazon Outlet Stores, Desert Hills Premium Outlets and Casino Morongo and the Mt. San Jacinto College Pass Campus. There is a high demand for service to these destinations whether for employment, necessities or pleasure. 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs Passenger amenities include 170 sign posted bus stops, 14 bus shelters with solar lighting and information panels and trash receptacles, 8 benches, and 15 trash cans. A fully -equipped shop truck, tools and repair equipment were delivered in 2012. All fixed route and Dial -A -Ride vehicles had either new security cameras and recording equipment installed or existing new upgraded and a new Para transit vehicle will be ordered with expected delivery in August 2013. A need for a replacement fixed route bus is anticipated for FY 2013-14. CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes As stated previously, the Cabazon Evening Express route began service in November of 2012. There have been no other changes to service, however analysis of routes 5 and 6 are being done in an effort to reduce headway. Once data is compiled and analysis complete, modifications will be made to reduce headways on both routes to 60 minutes or less. 3.2 Marketing Plans and Promotions Efforts have been made to market the Pass Transit System over the past year and will continue in the coming year. These efforts include purchasing advertising on a map of the San Gorgonio Pass Area, distribution of route maps by delivery to the library, Chamber of Commerce, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Mt. San Jacinto Pass Campus, local hotels and other businesses. Kiosks have been installed at all bus stop signs with current maps and time points included. 11 The following marketing efforts will be undertaken to promote ridership growth. 1. Continue outreach programs to schools and at community events. 2. Attend senior community meetings to provide information. 3. Participation in the Mt. San Jacinto Jr. College GO -PASS Program to encourage ridership of college students. 4. Enclose flyers with transit information in city utility bills. 5. Coordinate Travel Training through RTA'S Mobility Training program. The City of Banning's website at www.ci.banninq.ca.us provides basic Pass Transit route and schedule information. Transit staff is currently working to make information about routes and services more accessible. Customers can submit comments, complaints, concerns and suggestions through the city website. CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget For FY 13/14 operating funds needed to operate the Banning Pass Transit System are $1,293,675 for the Fixed Route and DAR. The operating funds consist of $1,142,339 local transportation funds (LTF). The projected fare box revenue for FY 13/14 is $149,836. Additional revenue in the amount of $1,500 will come from interest income. In an effort to increase efficiencies in service, the requested funds will allow for the conversion of full-time equivalent hours to two full-time driver positions and part-time hours allotted to the upkeep and maintenance of bus shelters by the Community Center Caretaker. Presently the maintenance and cleaning of the City bus shelters is done by the streets/parks maintenance division of the public works department, however with cutbacks that were made over the past two years, the staff is unable to maintain the shelters to appropriate health and safety standards. Additional funding is also allocated for additional administrative support. In addition to aggressively completing previously funded Capital projects, staff anticipates the need for one 35' passenger coach in FY 13/14. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program Capital projects are funded through STA funds and Proposition 1 B grants for Banning Pass Transit. 12 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements The City of Banning submitted an Americans with Disabilities Act Paratransit Plan to the FTA on January 26, 1992. Pass Transit fixed route buses are equipped with ADA compliant mobility device lifts and are accessible to persons with disabilities. A procedure is in place to provide service to a customer in a mobility device should a fixed route bus lift fail. Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride services provide ADA complementary Paratransit service for the fixed route services operated by Banning Transit System. Beaumont Transit System offers the same service through its Pass Transit Dial -a -Ride operation. The system uses a self -certification process with professional verification. Banning Transit System staff processes ADA certifications for Pass Transit operations. Title VI Banning Transit System/Pass Transit does not utilize federal funds for operating expenses. As such, Title VI requirements do not currently apply to the transit system. Alternatively Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policy) Pass Transit fixed -route buses are CNG powered. Pass Transit Dial -a -Ride vehicles (which are less than 33,000 lbs. GVW and 15-passenger capacity) and administrative and driver relief vehicles are gasoline powered. Future vehicle purchases will be in compliance with the RCTC and South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) policies regarding alternative fuel transit vehicles. The CNG Fueling Station at the City of Banning Corporation Yard provides expanded CNG capacity and fast fueling capability. With increased capacity and redundant compressor units, having adequate and reliable CNG pumping capacity will not be an issue in the foreseeable future. STA Compliance The City of Banning does not utilize State Transit Assistance (STA) funding for operating expenses. As such, compliance with the Public Utilities Commission requirement is not applicable. 13 RCTC EMI M=m lix�s [o.ny 1.uepriaim Cnimesum Bus (Motorbus) / Directly Operated Table I - Fleet In ven tory Fir 2013/ 14 Short Range Transit Plan City of Banning Year Mfg. Model Built Code Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length Fuel Type Code # of Active # of Life to Date Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles FY Vehicles Prior Year End 2012/13 FY 2012/13 FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2009 2001 2004 2010 2002 2003 2010 CMD EDN EDN EDN FRD FRD FRD Malibu Transmark Transmark XHF Ranger Ranger Ranger 5 33 33 31 2 2 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 35 35 34 12 12 HG CN CN CN GA GA GA 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,654 446,362 637,839 134,091 55,223 47,688 15,693 10,153 482,227 679,922 190,840 59,893 52,137 23,872 10,153 482,227 339,961 95,420 59,893 52,137 23,872 Totals: RC C �MMM IixxJ� forty 1-orprmio, Cmmsim 108 6 9 Demand Response / Directly Operated 0 1,344,550 1,499,044 166,560 Table I - Fleet Inventory FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan City of Banning Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped # of Active # of Life to Date Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles Vehicle Type FY Vehicles Prior Year End Length Code 2012/13 FY 2012/13 FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2010 2010 2001 2003 2008 EBC EBC EDN EDN ZZZ Aeroteeh EDN Aerate& Aeroteeh Ford 16 16 12 12 14 1 1 1 1 1 25 25 25 25 26 GA GA GA GA GA 1 1 1 1 1 0 O 0 a O 27,793 33,675 233,297 215,007 56,498 42,550 38,613 236,978 224,991 59,848 42,550 38,613 236,978 224,991 59,848 Totals: 70 5 5 0 566,270 602,980 120,596 14 r~ONNE� ri.=r4 ;carry timpa7dim [unw.icin Table 2 -- City of Banning -- SRTF Service Summary FY 2013/ 14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010 11 Audited FY 2011 j 12 Audited FY 2012 j 13 Plan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013 f 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 5 :; Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,240,257 $1,156,840 $1,310,135 $851,744 $1,293,675 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $122,797 $132,349 $138,780 $101,309 $151,336 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,117,460 $1,024,491 $1,171,355 $750,435 $1,142,339 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 128,244 136,563 144,091 108,862 169,724 Passenger Miles 327,258 348,828 445,041 277,738 429,045 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 13,387.3 13,368.8 15,341.0 10,909.1 16,170.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 215,531.2 295,938.5 239,460.0 257,958.6 250,977.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 224,148.1 301,923.3 268,924.0 263,518.0 268,244.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $92.64 $86.53 $85.40 $78.08 $80.00 Farebox Recovery Ratio 9.90 % 11.44 % 10.59 % 11.89 % 11.69 % Subsidy per Passenger $8.71 $7.50 $8.13 $6.89 $6.73 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.41 $2.94 $2.63 $2.70 $2.66 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $83.47 $76.63 $76.35 $68.79 $70.65 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $5.18 $3.46 $4.89 $2.91 $4.55 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 9.6 10.2 9.4 10.0 10.5 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.60 0.46 0.60 0.42 0.68 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. 15 Ir ��ril:dr .h�::`r S-h'n�7deM !3lYr`l'.:ci` Table 2 -- City of Banning -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics 1 I m Peak -Hour Fleet 5 5 Financial Data M t M ._ _ Total Operating Expenses $1,240,257 $1,127,082 $1,310,135 $803,581 $1,191,593 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $122,797 $125,761 $138,780 $99,196 $148,474 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,117,460 $1,001,321 $1,171,355 $704,384 $1,043,119 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 128,244 128,832 144,091 105,891 166,845 Passenger Miles 327,258 329,655 445,041 270,370 421,905 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 13,387.3 12,027.8 15,341.0 10,082.0 14,920.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 215,531.2 287,938.5 239,460.0 242,685.4 230,714.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 224,148.1 293,454.6 268,924.0 247,344.0 246,771.0 Performance Characteristics A. Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $92.64 _ -., $93.71 $85.40 $79.7a $79.87 Farebox Recovery Ratio 9.90 % 11.16 % 10.59 % 12.34 % 12.46 °I° Subsidy per Passenger $8.71 $7.77 $8.13 $6.65 $6.25 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.41 $3.04 $2.63 $2.61 $2.47 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $83.47 $83.25 $76.35 $69.87 $69.91 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $5.18 $3.48 $4.89 $2.90 $4.52 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 9.6 10.7 9.4 10.5 11.2 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.60 0.45 0.60 0.44 0.72 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. 16 NES EN= w n..r�4 sue, }Mixm,pim Grisrenim Table 2 -- City of Banning -- SIM> Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY2010/11 Audited FY2011/12 Audited FY2012/13 Plan FY2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics _ Peak -Hour Fleet 1 Financial Data = _ - Total Operating Expenses $29,758 $48,164 $102,082 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $6,588 $2,113 $2,862 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $23,170 $46,051 $99,220 Operating Characteristics _ Unlinked Passenger Trips 7,731 2,971 2,879 Passenger Miles 19,173 7,368 7,140 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 1,341.0 827.1 1,250.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 8,000.0 15,273.2 20,263.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 8,468.7 16,174.0 21,473.0 Performance Characteristics - Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $22.19 $58.24 $81.67 Farebox Recovery Ratio 22.14 % 4.39 % 2.80 % Subsidy per Passenger $3.00 $15.50 $34.46 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.21 $6.25 $13.90 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $17.28 $55.68 $79.38 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.90 $3.02 $4.90 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 5.8 3.6 2.3 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.97 0.19 0.14 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. 17 r Piwnde U.er.F Fnmp2ieum Comr.� Table 2 -- Banning -BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010. 11 Audited FY 2011 / 12 Audited FY 2012/ 13 Plan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013,114 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peal. -Hour Fleet 3 4 Financial data Total Operating Expenses $1,111,207 $985,656 $1,156,076 $749,146 $1,142,535 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $114,215 $119,052 $127480 $90,076 $135,220 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $996,992 $866,604 $1,028,896 $659,070 $1,007,315 Operating Characteristics _ T Unlinked Passenger Trips 120,018 127,499 134,005 101,933 156,831 Passenger Miles 297,645 316,198 405,091 252,794 392,019 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 11,934.0 12,063.0 12,766.0 9,985.1 13,905.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 186,568.2 269,632.5 195,746.0 238,925.6 207,409.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 191,831.1 273,501.3 202,486.0 242,713.0 218,509.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $93.11 $81.71 $90.56 $75.03 $82.17 Farebox Recovery Ratio 10.28 % 12.08 % 11.00 % 12.02 % 11.83 % Subsidy per Passenger $8.31 $6.80 $7.68 $6.47 $6.42 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.35 $2.74 $2.54 $2.61 $2.57 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $83.54 $71.84 $80.60 $66.01 $72.44 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $5.34 $3.21 $5.23 $2.76 $4.86 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 10.1 10.6 10.5 10.2 11.3 Passenger per Revenue Mile (6) 0.64 0.47 0.68 0.43 0.76 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. 18 Il .11 INEme Not -As ferry LnapYMim [oi.w,im Table 2 -- Banning-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/ 14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010 / 11 Audited FY 2011 / 12 Audited FY 2012 / 13 Plan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics _ Peak -Hour Fleet 2 _ Financial Data M Total Operating Expenses Total Passenger Fare Revenue Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $129,050 $8,582 $120,468 $171,184 $13,297 $157,887 $154,059 $11,600 $142,459 $102,598 $11,233 $91,365 $151,140 $16,116 $135,024 Operating Characteristics _A_ . f Unlinked Passenger Trips 8,226 9,064 10,086 6,929 12,893 Passenger Miles 29,614 32,630 39,950 24,944 37,026 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 1,453.3 1,305.8 2,575.0 924.0 2,265.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 28,963.0 26,306.0 42,714.0 19,033.0 43,568.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 32,317.0 28,422.0 66,438.0 20,805.0 49,735.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $88.80 $131.09 $59.83 $111.03 $66.73 Farebox Recovery Ratio 6.65 % 7.77 % 7.52 % 10.95 % 10.66 % Subsidy per Passenger $14.64 $17.42 $14.12 $13.19 $10.47 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $4.07 $4.84 $3.57 $3.66 $3.65 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $82.89 $120.91 $55.32 $98.88 $59.61 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.16 $6.00 $3.34 $4.80 $3.10 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 5.7 6.9 3.9 7.5 5.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.28 0.34 0.24 0.36 0.30 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. 19 TABLE 2A Excluded Routes: BAN — lE is the only excluded Route. This route is a test route to extend the hours of Route 1. Began November 13, 2012. 20 ��M m i e h . n d . S 1 w A Y r a f s Y 1 �� D a t a E l e m e n t s T a b l e 3 - S R T P R o u t e S t a t i s t i c s C i t y o f B a n n i n g - - 1 F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 A l l R o u t e s R o u t e # D a y T y p e P e a k P a s s e n g e r R e v e n u e T o t a l R e v e n u e T o t a l O p e r a t i n g P a s s e n g e r N e t V e h i c l e s P a s s e n g e r s M i l e s H o u r s H o u r s M i l e s M i l e s C o s t R e v e n u e S u b s i d y B A N - 1 T o t a l 1 5 2 , 6 5 5 1 3 1 , 6 6 2 4 , 2 6 5 . 0 4 , 3 1 7 . 0 7 2 , 0 9 8 . 0 7 4 , 7 4 5 . 0 $ 3 6 0 , 1 8 1 $ 4 6 , 2 6 5 $ 3 1 3 , 9 1 6 B A N - 1 E W e e k d a y 1 2 , 8 7 9 7 , 1 4 0 1 , 2 5 0 , 0 3 , 3 1 5 , 0 2 0 , 2 6 3 . 0 2 1 , 4 7 3 . 0 $ 1 0 2 , 0 8 2 $ 2 , 8 6 2 $ 9 9 , 2 2 0 B A N - 5 T o t a l 1 5 2 , 9 1 9 1 3 2 , 2 9 7 4 , 1 9 5 , 0 4 , 3 8 0 , 0 5 2 , 4 6 4 . 0 5 2 , 8 7 5 . 0 $ 3 4 5 , 4 8 9 $ 4 4 , 9 8 1 $ 3 0 0 , 5 0 8 B A N - 6 T o t a l 1 4 8 , 3 5 8 1 2 0 , 9 2 0 4 , 1 9 5 . 0 4 , 3 4 5 . 0 6 2 , 5 8 4 . 0 6 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 $ 3 3 4 , 7 8 3 $ 4 1 , 1 1 2 $ 2 9 3 , 6 7 1 B A N - D A R T o t a l 2 1 2 , 8 9 3 3 7 , 0 2 6 2 , 2 6 5 . 0 3 , 5 1 0 . 0 4 3 , 5 6 8 . 0 4 9 , 7 3 5 . 0 $ 1 5 1 , 1 4 0 $ 1 6 , 1 1 6 $ 1 3 5 , 0 2 4 S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r T o t a l s 6 1 6 9 , 7 2 4 4 2 9 , 0 4 5 1 6 , 1 7 0 0 1 9 , 8 6 8 0 2 5 0 , 9 7 7 . 0 2 6 8 , 2 4 4 . 0 $ 1 , 2 9 3 , 5 7 5 $ 1 5 1 , 3 3 6 $ 1 , 1 4 2 , 3 3 9 C I D M O N M . n G m n 4 e n p , m i w f a m n i w P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s T a b l e 3 - S R T P R o u t e S t a t i s t i c s C i t y o f B a n n i n g - - 1 F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 A l l R o u t e s O p e r a t i n g O p e r a t i n g F a r e b o x S u b s i d y P e r S u b s i d y P e r S u b s i d y P e r C o s t P e r C o s t P e r C o s t P e r R e c o v e r y S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r R e v e n u e R e v e n u e P a s s e n g e r s P a s s e n g e r s R o u t e # D a y T y p e R e v e n u e H o u r R e v e n u e M i l e P a s s e n g e r R a t i o P a s s e n g e r M i l e H o u r M i l e P e r H o u r P e r M i l e B A N - 1 T o t a l $ 8 4 4 5 $ 5 . 0 0 $ 6 . 8 4 1 2 . 8 4 % $ 5 . 9 6 $ 2 . 3 8 $ 7 3 . 6 0 $ 4 . 3 5 1 2 . 3 0 . 7 3 B A N - 1 E W e e k d a y $ 8 1 . 6 7 $ 5 . 0 4 $ 3 5 . 4 6 2 . 8 0 % $ 3 1 . 4 6 $ 1 3 . 9 0 $ 7 9 . 3 8 $ 4 . 9 0 2 . 3 0 . 1 4 B A N - 5 T o t a l $ 8 2 . 3 6 $ 6 . 5 9 $ 6 . 5 3 1 3 . 0 1 % $ 5 . 6 8 $ 2 . 2 7 $ 7 1 . 6 3 $ 5 . 7 3 1 2 . 6 1 . 0 1 B A N - 6 T o t a l $ 7 9 . 8 1 $ 5 . 3 5 $ 6 . 9 2 1 2 . 2 8 % $ 6 . 0 7 $ 2 . 4 3 $ 7 0 . 0 1 $ 4 . 6 9 1 1 . 5 0 . 7 7 B A N - D A R T o t a l $ 6 6 7 3 $ 3 . 4 7 $ 1 1 . 7 2 1 0 . 6 6 % $ 1 0 . 4 7 $ 3 . 6 5 $ 5 9 . 6 1 $ 3 . 1 0 5 . 7 0 . 3 0 S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r T o t a l s $ 8 0 . 0 0 $ 5 . 1 5 $ 7 . 6 2 1 1 . 6 9 % $ 6 . 7 3 $ 2 . 6 6 $ 7 0 . 6 5 $ 1 . 5 5 1 0 . 5 0 . 6 8 2 1 TABLE 3A: INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTION Route 1 — Beaumont/Banning/Cabazon Pass Transit Route 1 provides service predominately along Ramsey Street & 6th Street between Beaumont City Hall, Banning and Cabazon, while serving the Casino Morongo, Cabazon neighborhoods and Cabazon shopping areas. This route operates on a two- hour headway and is complemented by an overlap with Route 2 (operated by Beaumont Transit System) along 75% of the route. It provides service to the remote Esperanza and Elm area of Cabazon. The route also provides service to the residential areas of Cabazon, James Venable Community Center, Casino Morongo, Desert Hills Premium Outlets and Cabazon outlets, and the commercial areas along 6th Street and Beaumont Avenue in Beaumont. This route provides riders access to many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices within the City of Banning and the unincorporated community of Cabazon. Destinations on Route 1 include: K-Mart, Albertsons, Wal-Mart Supercenter, Beaumont City Hall, Greyhound Crucero Agency, Amtrak California Thruway bus stop, Banning City Hall, The Gas Company, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Fox Cinemas, Banning Police Department, Desert Hills Premium Outlets, Cabazon Outlets, Casino Morongo and James Venable Community Center. Route 5 — Northern Banning This route operates on a 75 minute headway and provides service to the residential areas of the City of Banning that lie north of the 1-10 Freeway, the Riverside County Courthouse, the Banning Municipal Library, the Coombs Intermediate School, and the commercial areas along Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue. This neighborhood feeder route provides connections to many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices, Banning City Hall, Fox Cinemas, K-Mart, Albertsons, Rite Aid Pharmacy, Walgreens Pharmacy, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning Chamber of Commerce, Riverside County Superior Court, Banning Public Library, Banning Community Center, Banning Senior Center, Repplier Park Aquatics Center, U.S. Post Office, and various other shopping and school locations within the community. Route 6 — Southern Banning This route operates on a 75 minute headway and provides service to the residential areas south of the 1-10 Freeway, a small residential section north of Ramsey Street at the east end of the City of Banning, the commercial areas along Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue, Banning High School, apartment complexes, the Riverside County Smith Correctional Facility, and the Banning Municipal Airport. 22 This neighborhood feeder route provides connections to many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices, Banning City Hall, Fox Cinemas, K-Mart, Albertsons, Rite Aid Pharmacy, Walgreens Pharmacy, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning High School, the Riverside County Smith Correctional Facility, The Banning Municipal Airport, U.S. Post Office, and various other shopping and school locations within the community. Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride is provided within the entire city limits of Banning and Beaumont and within a 3/4 mile boundary of Routes 1 and 2 services in Cabazon. The City of Banning provides the ADA certification for Pass Transit Dial -A -ride services operated by the cities of Banning and Beaumont. Seniors (age 60 years and older), persons with disabilities, and ADA eligible passengers are eligible for dial -a -ride throughout the entire service area. Service hours vary for non-ADA eligible passengers. These categories of passengers also are required to fill out a certification application to determine eligibility of service. Once certified, a card is issued to the applicant. General public passengers (ages 5 — 59 years) are not eligible for dial -a -ride service. The primary uses of Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride are for transportation to medical appointments, workshop programs for persons with disabilities, shopping areas, employment, and connections with Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and Pass Transit Fixed Routes. 23 City of Banning SRTP FY 2013/14 Summary of Funds Requested Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B (PTMISEA) Prop 1 B Security Measure A Fare Box Other (2) FY 2013/14 Operating Assistance $1,293,675 $1,142,339 $149,836 $1,500 Subtotal: Operating $1,293,675 $1,142,339 $0 $0 $0 $0 $149,836 $1,500 FY10/11 Prop 1B Wreless Communication Download *ten 14-01 $18,835 $18,835 FY11/12Prop1BWrelessCommunication Download *ten 14-01 $18,833 $18,833 FY12/13 Prop 1 BWreless Communicaton Download Stem 14-01 $19,198 $19,198 35' Coach Replacement (Prop 1B FY 10/11) 14-02 $470,774 $470,774 Subtotal: Capital $527,640 $0 $0 $470,774 $56,866 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $1,821,315 $1,142,339 $0 $470,774 $56,866 $0 $149,836 $1,500 Note: Other (2) is from Interest Income 24 SRTP FY 13-14 TABLE 4 — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-01 PROJECT NAME Wireless Communication Download System PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this project is to improve the reliability of the surveillance system that is currently installed by having footage downloaded and stored without having to remove the hard drive from the bus. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION By negating the removal of hard drives for downloading, loss of recorded footage is virtually eliminated, thus enhancing passenger safety and improving the ability to view boarding and exiting operations as necessary. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1B Security FY 10/11 18,835 FY 11/12 18,833 FY 12/13 19,198 TOTAL $56,866 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE -OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER. Project No. 09-11 Computer Equipment STA $60,000 25 SRTP FY 13-14 TABLE 4 — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-02 PROJECT NAME 35' Coach Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of 35' coach used for fixed route. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Coach will be used as replacement for vehicle which has exceeded useful life PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1B (PTMISEA) FY 10/11 $470,774 TOTAL $470,774 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE -OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER. 26 City of Banning SRTP FY 2914/15 Summary of Funds Requested Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2014115 Project Description Capital Project Number [1] Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1B (PTMISFA) Prop 1B Security Measure Fare Box OtherO1 FY 2914/15 Operating Assistance $1,403,733 $1,262.610 $139,623 $1,590 Subtotal: Operating $1,403,733 $1.262.610 $0 $0 $0 $9 $139,623 $1,500 35' Coach Replacement -0' $409,909 $400.000 Subtotal: Capital S409,909 $0 $400.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital 51.803.733 $1,262,610 $400,000 $o $o $0 $139,623 $1,500 Note: Other (2) is from Interest Income City of Banning SRTP FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number [1] Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1B (PTMISEA) Prop 1B Security Measure Fare Box Other"' FY 2015/16 Operating Assistance $1,493,733 $1,399,488 $143,811 $1,500 Subtotal: Operating $1,403,733 $1,300,488 50 $0 $0 $D 5143 311 51 5DD Subtotal: Capital SD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital S1,445,799 $1,300,488 $0 $o $o $0 $143,811 $1,500 Note: Other (2) is from Interest Income 27 SRTP FY 13-14 TABLE 5.1A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER FY 15-01 PROJECT NAME 35' Coach Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of 35' coach used for fixed route. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Coach will be used as replacement for vehicle which has exceeded useful life PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA TOTAL $400,000 $400,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE -OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER. 28 TABLE 6 — PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Audit Recommendations (Covering FY 2006/07 — FY 2008/09) Action(s) Taken And Results 1. Banning Transit should implement the ♦ Passenger Mile data in Trans Track was remaining three prior audit recommendations: implemented in 2006 and is updated annually. ♦ Provide Passenger Mile data in TransTrack ♦ The hiring process for drivers has been ♦ Continued Recruitment of Drivers greatly improved through developing better ♦ Provide incentives for drivers to maintain communication with Human Resources. longevity ♦ Employee Recognition program in place honoring employees at each 10 year mark. The city also provides an excellent retirement package and recognizes seniority for scheduling. 2. Develop and enforce employee policies and ♦ An updated policy and procedures manual rules specific to providing consistent transit was completed and put into use in January service. 2011. ♦ Mandatory monthly safety meetings are held where all drivers are made aware of any changes in policies and procedures and reinforcement training in areas of concern. 3. Conduct daily reconciliation of fare box ♦ Through working with the city finance revenues with passenger counts. department, a procedure was developed and is being utilized for daily reconciliation of fare box revenues with passenger counts. 29 liiii1.1 OEM - �Inr�t fftrm 1-eep:7e6nn (amen:in Fable 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Banning Data Elements FY 2O12/13 Plan FY 2O12/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 144,091 Passenger Miles 445,041 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 15,341.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 239,460.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 268,924.0 Total Operating Expenses $1,310,135 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $138,780 Net Operating Expenses $1,171,355 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 10.59 % I >= 10.00°/o I 11.89 % I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $85.40 [_ $85.23 $78.08 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $8.13 >_ $6.26 and [_ $8.46 $6.89 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $2.63 >_ $2.45 and [_ $3.31 $2.70 Meets Target 4, Subsidy Per Hour $76.35 >_ $63.45 and {_ $85.85 $68.79 Meets Target 5, Subsidy Per Mile $4.89 >_ $2.88 and <_ $3.90 $2.91 Meets Target 6, Passengers Per Revenue Hour 9.40 >= 8.59 and t= 11.62 10.00 Meets Target 7, Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.60 }= 0.39 and [= 0.53 0,42 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators 30 FY 2013/14 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider: City of Banning All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2011j12 End of Year Actual FY 2012/13 3rd quarter Year -to -Date FY 2013/14 plan FY 2013/14 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 136,563 108,862 169,724 None Passenger Miles 348,828 277,738 429,045 None Revenue Hours 13,368.8 10,909.1 16,170.0 None Total Hours 14,666.2 12,373.9 19,868.0 None Revenue Miles 295,938.5 257,958.6 250,977.0 None Total Miles 301,923.3 263,518.0 268,244.0 None Operating Costs $1,156,840 $851,744 $1,293,675 None Passenger Revenue $132,349 $101,309 $151,336 None Operating Subsidy $1,024,491 $750,435 $1,142,339 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $86.53 $78.08 $80.00 [_ $79.81 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $3.91 $3.30 $5.15 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $8.47 $7.82 $7.62 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.44 % 11.89 % 11.69 % >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $7.50 $6.89 $6.73 >_ $5.86 and [_ $7.92 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $2.94 $2.70 $2.66 }_ $2.30 and C= $3.11 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $76.63 $68.79 $70.65 >_ $58.47 and C= $79.11 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $3.46 $2.91 $4.55 }_ $2.47 and C= $3.35 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 10.20 10.00 10.50 >= 8.50 and {= 11.50 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.46 0.42 0.68 >= 0.36 and <= 0.48 Better Than Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2013/14 Plan to the FY 2013/14 Primary Target. 31 TABLE 9 - HIGHLIGHTS OF 2013/14 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN ■ Purchase ADA accessible van ■ Purchase one fixed route coach ■ Install additional bus stop signs along routes 1, 5, and 6, thereby, reducing the number of flag stops ■ Closely monitor Cabazon Evening Express, adding service as necessary. ■ Closely monitor service to the MSJC Pass Campus and address needs as necessary ■ Continue working with the City of Beaumont staff regarding the coordination of routes, schedules, passenger amenities, and fares to ensure that Pass Transit is seamless and simple to use by Pass Area residents ■ Contract with Transportation Management Design Inc. to complete Comprehensive Analysis of Service Table 9A — OPERATING & FINANCIAL DATA BANNING TRANSIT SYSTEM/PASS TRANSIT FY 2009/10 Audited FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Estimate (Based on 3rd Quarter Actuals) FY 2013/14 Planned System wide Ridership 127,932 128,244 136,563 144,091 169,724 Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $84.33 $92.64 $86.53 $85.40 $79.81 32 Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2011/12 Audit FY 12/13 (Estimate) FY 13/14 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 132,349 140,000 141,570 2.Interest - - 3. General Fund Supplement - - - 4. Measure A - - - 5. Advertising Revenue - - - 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets - - 7. CNG Revenue - - 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - - 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - - - 10. Investment Income - - - 11. CalPers CERBT - - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - - - 13. Other Revenues - - - TOTAL REVENUE 132,349 140,000 141,570 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1,156,840 1,170,105 1,348,675 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 11% 12% 10% 33 TRANSIT City of Beaumont SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 DRAFT JUNE 12, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents CHAPTER 1 - SYSTEM OVERVIEW 3 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS 4 RIDERSHIP DEMOGRAPHICS 4 FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT SERVICES 6 PARATRANSIT SERVICES 7 REGIONAL EXPRESS BUS SERVICE 7 FARE STRUCTURE 7 FLEET CHARACTERISTICS g FACILITIES g CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 10 FIXED ROUTE SERVICE 10 DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE 12 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 12 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS 13 MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROWTH 14 EQUIPMENT, PASSENGER AMENITIES AND FACILITY NEEDS 15 CHAPTER 3 - PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 16 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES 16 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION 16 CHAPTER 4 - FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 17 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET 17 FUNDING PLANS TO SUPPORT PROPOSED OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAM 18 REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS 18 2 CHAPTER 1 - SYSTEM OVERVIEW The Pass Transit System is the result of a cooperative effort between the City of Banning (Banning Municipal Transit System) and the City of Beaumont (Beaumont Municipal Transit Agency).. The Pass Transit System consists of two independent, but well coordinated, transit systems. The coordinated service area of Pass Transit includes the cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa, the unincorporated areas of Cabazon and Cherry Valley, and the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians Reservation. Both fixed route and dial -a -ride services are provided throughout the service area. There are three major thoroughfares passing through the Pass Area including interstate 10, State Highway 60, and Route 79. Major employers within the area include the Casino Morongo, Lowe's Distribution Center, Beaumont and Banning Unified School Districts, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Loma Linda University Highland Springs Medical Plaza, 2nd Street Marketplace which includes the WalMart Supercenter, Desert Hills Premium Outlets, and several manufacturing companies. Pass Transit was created as a combined effort between Banning Transit System and Beaumont Transit System started in November 2004. Routes 1 and 2 were modified from the previous Banning Transit System Cabazon Route and Beaumont Transit System Route 1. Banning's Northern Route was renumbered Route 5 and Banning's Southern Route was renumbered Route 6. Beaumont's existing Routes 3 and 4 remained the same. A Memorandum of Understanding was developed to allow each city's Dial -A -Ride services to cross jurisdictional boundary lines so that a passenger did not have to transfer. A new joint Rider's Guide was developed, combined transfers and ten -ride ticket books were printed, buses and bus stop signs were decaled `Pass Transit' and fares were established to be the same for the convenience of riders. Within the service area of Pass Transit there are ten elementary schools, three middle schools, two intermediate schools and two high schools as well as one community day school, two alternative high schools, two adult education schools, one private school and Mt San Jacinto Community College Pass Campus. Four 55+ plus communities and various mobile home parks are also served by Pass Transit, oftentimes providing a vital link to necessary medical services at the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, as well as Beaver Medical Group, Loma Linda Medical Offices and Rancho Paseo Medical Group. In addition, Beaumont Municipal Transit Agency also provides transportation to two food banks, two local group homes and a number of churches in the community. This fiscal year with the introduction of Route 120, it will also provide transportation to the San Bernardino Metrolink and the VA Hospital located in Loma Linda. A free shuttle service 3 runs during the summer concert series and Cherry Festival to provide seniors, those with disabilities, and low income patrons free transportation to the events. Finally, with the addition of the new courthouse in Banning in the next year, Beaumont Transit has decided to allow jurors to ride free if they possess an active juror badge. Population Profile and Demographic Projections The latest available statistics from the California Department of Finance show residential population within Beaumont had a 2.1 % increase from year 2011 (38,034) to year 2012 (38,851). The unincorporated area of Cherry Valley had a population of 6,362 residents in 2010. In 2008 and 2010, Beaumont was named the second fastest growing city in the State of California with a 224% increase from 2000 to 2010. This coincides with Riverside County being the fastest growing county in the state in 2010 with a 42% increase over the year 2000. The 2010 census indicated that the Beaumont community is ethnically diverse with a makeup of: Caucasian (63%), Hispanic (40%), Black (6%), Asian and Pacific Islander (8%), and all other races (16%). Senior citizens (age 65+) make up 11 % of the population, indicating a potential for growth in the demand for Dial -A -Ride services and a slight growth in Fixed Route services. Youth (age 18 and under) also make up a substantial portion of the population (30%). The 2010 census showed the median household income within Beaumont was $34,254, well below the national average of $41,994. This indicates the potential of an exceptional need for transit services. However, in 2007, the average home price was $322,500 noting a high percentage of two -income families and a much higher median household income than reported at the 2000 census. This translates to less of a need for transit services today than in previous years on much of Beaumont's system. Finally, it is important to note that Beaumont's Route 2 stretches into Cabazon and the City of Banning, where 14% of households are below poverty level, according to the 2000 census, indicating the presence of a number of transit dependent individuals specifically on that route. Ridership Demographics This section provides demographic information that shows Beaumont Transit's passenger profile including the gender, age, ethnicity, and income of the riders. Data available is from ridership surveys taken from 2010 to 2011 for Beaumont. In May of this year, as part of the comprehensive operations analysis, TMD will be conducting onboard ridership surveys and will have updated demographic information at that time. The majority of riders are female (62%). Eleven percent (11 %) of the riders are under 19 years of age. Eighty percent (80%) of the riders are of working age (19 to 60). Finally, nine percent (9%) of riders are over 60. The ethnic distribution of riders shows that a majority are Hispanic or Black with 40% of the ridership being Caucasian. 4 1 Ridership Ethnicity Indian, 2% other, 1% Asian, 1%— Hispanic, 43% Ethnicity Black, 12% ,White, 40% Thirty-nine percent (39%) of riders are employed either full or part time and sixteen percent (16%) are students. Retirees make up nine percent (9%) of the ridership while the unemployed are fifteen percent (15%) of total ridership. Income levels of bus riders are low. About seventy-three percent (73%) make less than $20,000 per year. Bus riders also are transit dependent and seventy-six percent (76%) of them do not have a car available for the trip they were taking. Approximately one-half of Beaumont's riders use transit to get to their place of employment. It should be noted that of the riders that do own a vehicle, thirty-three percent (33%) of those ride the bus because driving is too expensive. With the elimination of school bus transportation for the local middle schools and high school, Beaumont Transit has seen a large increase in youth passengers. At this time, youth ridership makes up over 50% of total passengers. As Beaumont Unified continues to decrease transportation costs, it is expected that youth passenger numbers will continue to rise. 5 Ridership Household Income Ridership Household Income GUnder$10,000 1419.001-$18,988 c$20,000 - $28988 O $30,000 - $38,988 13$40,000 - $49,988 13$501100 - $74809 O $75,000+ Ridership Employment Status Additional ridership statistics: • Seventy-six percent (76%) of riders do not own a car. • Ninety-eight percent (98%) of riders walk 4 or fewer blocks to the bus stop. • Twenty percent (20%) of riders said they were using the bus to go to school. • Eighty percent (80%) of the riders are of working age (19 to 60). • Nine percent (9%) of riders are over 60. • Thirty-seven percent (37%) ride at least five (5) days every week. Fixed Route Transit Services Beaumont Transit operates eight fixed routes and one commuterlink. Routes 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 17, 25 and CommuterLink 120 are operated by the Beaumont Transit System. Fixed route service hours are: Monday — Friday Saturday and Sunday 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Limited service (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) is provided on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday, Presidents' Day, Veterans' Day, and the day after Thanksgiving Day. No service is provided on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Current ridership trends indicate that peak hours are in the early morning and late afternoon, when youth passengers ride more frequently. In previous years, youth ridership was non-existent however currently it makes up over 50% of the monthly ridership. Route 2 exhibits continued growth and trends indicate that majority of passengers are now using this route to get to work in Cabazon. General passengers 6 continue to use Beaumont Transit to get to and from work. Senior and Disabled passenger trends indicate that they use transit for shopping and errands. Paratransit Services Dial -A -Ride provides service to senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for complementary paratransit service under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Service hours for the Dial -A -Ride service are: Elderly and Disabled without ADA certification Monday - Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Persons with ADA Complementary Paratransit Certification (with 24-hr registration) Monday - Friday 6.00 a.m. to 7,00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Beaumont Transit system will provide its residents with service in Banning and within a mile boundary of Route 2 in Cabazon. Limited service (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) is provided on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday, Presidents Day, Veteran's Day, and the day after Thanksgiving Day. No service is provided on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Ridership trends indicate that Dial -A -Ride services remain steady. In previous years, Dial -A -Ride passengers used the service primarily for shopping trips and errands. Current trends have shown an increase in usage for medically necessary appointments, primarily to the new dialysis center that is centrally located in Beaumont. Regional Express Bus Service This fiscal year, Beaumont Transit is introducing the Commuterlink 120 to provide transportation from the Pass Area, including Calimesa, to both the San Bernardino Metrolink and the VA Hospital in Loma Linda. Additionally, passengers can use Day Passes to transfer between the Pass Transit System fixed routes and the RTA Line 31 to Hemet and Line 35 to Moreno Valley. The RTA Line 210 continues to operate as a connection between the Pass Area and the City of Riverside. In 2012, Sunline introduced Commuter Link 220. This route was created to help connect the eastern desert region to the City of Riverside. Both the 210 and the 220 offer connections to the Metrolink trains traveling from Riverside to Los Angeles and Orange County. Fare Structure The fare structure was adjusted in April 2012 for the Pass Transit System. The current fixed route fare is $1.15 lone -way trip for general passengers. Youth passengers pay $1.00/one-way. The fare is $.65/one-way trip for senior citizens and persons with disabilities. A zone fare of $.25 exists for travel between Banning and Cabazon/Morongo Reservation service areas. (The route is twice the length of any other route in the system. The zone fare helps to recover operating costs.) Passengers 7 under 46" in height pay $.25. Ten -ride ticket books are offered for $10.35 each; senior citizens and persons with disabilities can purchase the books at a reduced cost of $5.85110-ride book. Day passes are sold for $3.00 each; senior citizens and persons with disabilities can purchase the passes for $1.80. Monthly passes are $36.00; youth are $25.00; senior citizens and persons with disabilities are $21.50 each. In addition to those passes, a 10 tripper pass is offered for both Dial -A -Ride and Fixed Route youth passengers at a rate of $18.00 and $10.00 respectively. With the addition of Commuterlink 120, Beaumont Transit plans to adopt a discounted rate for veterans and provide free service for all current enlisted members of our armed forces. Veterans of the military will pay the discounted fare equal to the seniors and disabled. Pass Area Transit Fare Structure � . Room _--tea- •Pare Categories rra�• e E Karr ratt Y II erFrvem Day Pasg fries ea ftelti eseusee audio& a 10-Tripper Punch Pass When t orrer - -,. serikrl. ,Base Fara 104icket Beek . Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 WA $10.35 $36.00 ;'oath(grades !Sob $1Aa $3.D0 $1900. •.14/A $2500 Senior (65+)`" $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Diestjled.. $ 65 $1 80 N/A $5.85 $21 50 $1.80 N/A $5.65 $21.50 Child, ter tell cr'andel "If you plan to use you board the bus. • 8.25 N/A WA fare, you discounted N/A must show proper passes/tickets. - NIA ID each time a senior, disabled or military discounted You must also show proper ID to purchase Rial.R_Ri de Figh Ries � real' fare evade whew has arrives ii�rvars #alerr+l anab► •Iuamea. Fare Categories _ Base Fare le -Ride Punch Cara One -Way $2.00 $18.00 Companion $3 00 WA Dial-A-Rlda rs a transportation service for ADA, disabled and active adults over 65 years of age. Reservations are required 24-hours in advance and may be made by calling (951) 769-5532. PCA (wn.D.)" FREE FREE No Below $2, 00 NIA Child or tell a under) $3.00 WA ••If you plan to use a PCA (Personal Care Atten- dant) free fare; you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. COMMUTEitUMN fABE'i I M;rr •xaEL fsra Weedily MRrtnhire asarresr. Orsria _•„ .-t melee allearrpe - Fare Categories - Commu ar .: Fare (Route 1211) General $3.00 Youth tootles rFia.) $2.av Commuterlink 120 Is a regional transportation service for all passengers. Connections may be made. to Pass Transit fixed routes, RTA fixed mimes and commutedinks, Sun -tine commuter - links, and Metroleak trains. Additional fares may aPP1V. Senior (66•)`• $2.00 Disabled" $2 03 Military Veteran*' $2.00 Child OS' teA DetAdir) $2 00 **If you plan to use a senior or disabled dis- counted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tkcicets. 8 Fleet Characteristics Beaumont Transit operates eight fixed route vehicles and one commuterlink. Three of the vehicles are CNG-powered, two are diesel -powered, and three are gasoline powered. All are equipped with bicycle racks and ADA compliant with wheelchair lifts and tie -down stations. Four of the buses have audio announcement systems for the visually impaired. The transit system also operates five Dial -A -Ride vehicles (three in revenue service and two in reserve). All are gasoline -powered. Four of the five vehicles are ADA compliant with wheelchair lifts and tie -down stations. Beaumont Transit will be hiring a lead mechanic this fiscal year. There has been a 52% passenger increase in the last 3 years and with that has come additional routes. In FY 2008/09 Beaumont Transit had 4 routes and now it operates 10. Beaumont Transit has increased its fleet by 2 buses to accommodate these additional routes in the last 3 years without hiring a new mechanic to help service the growing fleet. Beaumont has also added a second route offering Saturday service and a route offering Sunday service. Currently there are not enough mechanics available to cover the hours of operation The CNG buses are fueled at fueling stations located at the Beaumont Unified School District's transportation yard and at the City of Banning corporate yard. The fueling stations are currently the only CNG stations in the Pass Area large enough to meet the transit system's demand. Beaumont Transit is actively exploring the purchase of a CNG station in the area; however, at this time, negotiations are confidential. It is planned that in the next year Beaumont will purchase one new CNG bus for Fixed Route. In April 2013, three buses were sold at auction: one diesel, one CNG and one unleaded. Additionally, one diesel was sold at fair market value to a local church. It is also planned that Beaumont will be given 1 or 2 used buses from RTA for use on the Commuterlink 120 to allow for the new route to build ridership. Facilities Administrative services for Beaumont are provided by staff from various City of Beaumont departments with the majority of operations located at the Transit Services yard. Effective July 1, 2013, Transit operations will move to the Civic Center campus located in downtown Beaumont. Building improvements and information systems preparations have been underway for the last several months and are expected to be completed in the next 60 days. Moving the operations will include more office space, a new phone system, modern facilities with better heating and air conditioning, a larger parking area for the buses with more security, and direct access to all other City departments. Beaumont Transit will be hiring a CSC I specifically for transit this fiscal year. There has been no hiring to assist with administrative duties. Currently, the Operations Manager handles all office tasks and dispatch. Due to the increase in service hours, Beaumont 9 Transit is no longer able to cover all the hours that a dispatcher should be present, including weekends. The phone system is currently out to date and upon moving to it's new location, transit administration will switch from a line that allows one call at a time to a line that allows 17 plus calls at a time. This will add to the need for increased assistance in the office. Additionally, all customer service type functions, including bus passes, maps and schedules, and general transit information continue to be performed at the following locations with extended service hours at two of the locations: Beaumont Civic Center Hours: Monday -Thursday Friday 8:00am to 5:00pm 8:00am-Noon Beaumont Police Dept. Hours: Monday -Friday 7:00am-7:00pm Saturday and Sunday 7:00am-Noon Community Recreation Center Hours: Sunday -Saturday 6:00am-8:00pm Responsibility for overall administration of the transit system is provided by the City Resources Director. Maintenance of the vehicles is provided by Transit staff and will remain at the Transit yard. CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE Systemwide ridership for FY 2012 was 183,176. Estimated ridership for FY 2013 is projected at over 200,000 riders based on the first three quarters. Fixed Route Service The Pass Transit System operates eight fixed routes and one commuterlink. Routes 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 17 and CommuterLink 120 are operated by the Beaumont Transit System. Routes 3 & 4 operate on one -hour headway. Route 2 offers two-hour headway throughout the commercial areas of Beaumont, Banning, Cabazon, and the Morongo commercial development. Routes 7, 9, and 17 offer limited services in the mornings and afternoons. Route 11 offers limited service in the mornings. Commuterlink 120 offers direct service to the San Bernardino Metrolink Station and Loma Linda VA Hospital. Route 2- Beaumont to Cabazon Route 2 currently makes up 17.99% of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 2878. This route operates on a two-hour headway and is complemented by an overlap with Route 1 that reduces headway on 75% of the route to one hour. 10 Route 3- Beaumont High to Wal-Mart via Sundance Route 3 currently makes up 17.91 % of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 2866.This route operates on one -hour headway and serves the residential areas of Beaumont (north of 1-10 freeway). A 2"d bus has been added to accommodate for passenger increase during peak times in the morning and late afternoon. Route 4- Downtown to Wal-Mart Route 4 currently makes up 18.02% of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 2883. This route operates on one -hour headway and serves downtown Beaumont and the residential areas of the city of Beaumont including a small portion south of Interstate 10. At this time, Route 4 also provides Sunday service which assists many local residents in getting to church. This route interlines with Route 11. Route 7- Tournament Hills & Fairway Canyon to Cherry Valley Route 7 currently makes up 16.04% of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 2565. This route operates on half-hour headway between the hours of 6:30am and 8:00am and again between the hours of 3:00pm and 5:30pm. This route has coordinating time points for passenger transfers with Routes 3, 9, 17, and 25. Route 9- Seneca Springs to Cherry Valley Route 9 currently makes up 9.08% of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1452. This route operates on half-hour headway between the hours of 6:30am and 8:00am and again between the hours of 3:00pm and 4:00pm. A tripper bus service has been added to meet the growing demand of passengers on this route. This route has coordinating time points for passenger transfers with Routes 3, 7 and 17. Route 11- Banning to Cherry Valley Route 11 currently makes up 2.81 % of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 449 .This route interlines with Route 4 and operates on three-quarter hour headway between 6:30am and 7:20am. Route 17- Tournament Hills to Fairway Canyon Route 17 currently makes up 10.27% of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1643. This route operates on half-hour headway between the hours of 6:30am and 8:00am and again between the hours of 3:00pm and 3:45pm. A tripper bus service has been added to meet the growing demand of passengers on this route. Route 25- Downtown Beaumont & 2nd St Marketplace Route 25 currently makes up 7.73% of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1237. This route operates on half-hour headway as a "trunk route" offering shuttle -type transportation to local shopping centers. 11 Route 40- Summer Concert Series Shuttle Route 40 currently makes up .01 % of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1.4. This route operates on fifty minute headway between 4:00pm and 10:OOpm every Wednesday from July 4th through August 7th. This route was created to assist seniors, disabled, and low-income riders by providing them transportation to the free Summer Concert Series. Route 120- Commuter Link Route 120 currently makes up .01 % of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1.4. This route will operate on 1.5 hour headway as a Commuter Link between the Pass Area and the San Bernardino Metrolink, with stops in Calimesa and the Loma Linda VA Hospital. It will run between the hours of 5:OOam and 7:00pm. Time points have been created to specifically coincide with the Metrolink trains and transfers to RTA and OmniTrans. Dial -A -Ride Service Dial -A -Ride currently averages 1565 passenger trips per month. Dial -A -Ride operates on a reservation system. Passengers are asked to call at least 24-hours in advance to schedule a pick-up. Key Performance Indicators The Riverside County Transportation Commission has adopted a Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) for the transit and commuter rail operators of Riverside County. The PIP sets forth efficiency and effectiveness standards that the transit operators are to meet. Progress towards these standards is reported quarterly to the Commission. Below is a table of the operating performance indicators adopted in the PIP and this plan's projections for FY 2012/13. 12 Beaumont Municipal Transit Agency Beaumont Municipal Transit Agency FY 2012 FY 2013 %Increase/ FY 2014 Audited Projected Decrease Planned Performance Statistics Unlinked Passenger Trips 183,176 184,256 1%r 211,644 Operating Cost Per Revenue Hours • $87.03r $87.42 0%r $93.14 Farebox Recovery Ratio • 13.02% r 12.64% -3%r 10.23% Subsidy per Passenger $6.88IF $6.72 -2% $8.14 Subsidy per Passenger Mile • $3.41* $3.37 -1% $4.07 Subsidy per Revenue Hour • $75.70r $76.36 1%r $83.06 Subsidy per Revenue Mile $5.02 g $5.31 6% $5.39 Passengers per Revenue Hour F 11.00 11.4 4% 10.3 Passengers per Revenue Mile .73 .79 8% .66 Productivity Improvement Efforts Pass Area transit has made a significant effort to improve productivity in the last two fiscal years and will continue to do so in the future, as evident by passenger increase. From FY 09 to FY 13, there has been a 52% increase in passenger trips. Such notable improvements include fiscal responsibility, increasing passenger fares to meet increased operational costs for transit services, more efficient data compilation, and combining staffing assignments to reduce personnel overhead. Beaumont has been working diligently to increase youth ridership for elementary through college -level students. Effective July 1, 2011, the Beaumont Pass Transit began offering customer service type functions at three locations including: Beaumont Civic Center, Beaumont Police Department, and the Community Recreation Center. With the addition of two locations to serve the needs of the customers and the added benefit of operating hours early in the morning, later in the evening and over the weekend, it is anticipated that there will be more effective communication with passengers and hope that Beaumont Transit will continue to grow. In addition to added hours, Beaumont Transit has also added a text messaging service. All subscribers receive text updates on service hour changes, route delays and special events. A QR code has also been added to all route maps. This allows passengers to quickly access all route information by scanning the bar code with their smart phone. Route maps are posted at all bus stops/shelters. 13 Beaumont Transit is currently working with Transportation Management & Design, Inc. on a Comprehensive Operations Analysis. The goal of this project will be to evaluate the current system and develop recommendations for enhanced service efficiency. Phase I of this project has begun with onboard ridership surveys to be conducted in mid -May. Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Major trip destinations include the high school and middle schools, MSJC Pass Campus, commercial areas along Beaumont Avenue, 6th Street, 2nd Street Marketplace, Oak Valley shopping center, Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue; the Super Wal- Mart transfer point; area elementary, intermediate and high schools; Desert Hills Outlet Malls, Cabazon Outlet Mall, and Casino Morongo; Beaver Medical and the Highland Springs medical offices adjacent to the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital and thrift store; Riverside County Department of Public Social Services; Banning Mental Health and public health clinic; and H.E.L.P. In August 2009, the Beaumont Unified School District terminated all transportation services to both middle schools and the high school forcing students to find alternate transportation. All of the routes that specifically accommodate youth passengers are at capacity. A tripper bus was added to Routes 3, 9, and 17 to accommodate the overflow of passengers that travel on that route. A second bus was recently added to Route 7 to offer more time points and faster service for those passengers. Approximately 60% of the passenger base are youth passengers, with moderate growth expected in the next year. Beaumont Transit staff is currently working closely with Beaumont Unified School staff in coordinating school bell schedules to accommodate youth passengers and maximize efficiencies with the fixed routes. Providing service to major employers, including Stater Brothers, Duraplastics, Wal-Mart Supercenter, Lowe's Distribution Plant, and Home Depot, was anticipated to increase ridership. Ridership has increased to the Wal-Mart Supercenter. Future warehouse distribution centers are anticipated in the next two years as well as the Mid -County Justice Center. Staff will continue to monitor these developments closely and plan route changes in accordance with work hours. Ridership to Home Depot and the Oak Valley shopping center has not increased as anticipated. The service to these centers and its utilization will be part of the system wide COA. With the addition of Commuterlink 120, special efforts will be made to market this route to local veterans and enlisted members of our armed services. Beaumont Transit has already been in contact with the local veteran advocates and preliminary discussions have been held with representatives from March Air Reserve Base. Finally, expanded outreach efforts to elementary -aged passengers, senior citizen organizations, schools and major employers are included in the plan for FY 2014. 14 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs The system's fixed route buses are equipped with passenger -operated bicycle racks. All revenue service vehicles are equipped with wheelchair lifts and tie -down stations. Eight vehicles are equipped with seatbelts. Bus stops in commercial areas are equipped with benches. Kiosks have been installed at all bus stop signs. Waste containers are available at many of the commercial bus stops. Flag down stops are utilized in a few of the residential areas of Beaumont. Currently, Beaumont Transit has bus shelters located at five of the most utilized stops. Two bus shelters were purchased in December 2012 with solar lighting and placed at the Civic Center and Beaumont High School. Beaumont recently purchased 17 additional shelters to be placed in high volume areas. Bus benches will also be placed throughout town and new schedule kiosks are being installed as well. All bus stop amenities were purchased with STA capital funds during FY 2011/12. Also purchased during FY 2011/12 were digital security cameras for all new buses in the fleet and the necessary viewing equipment. This project was funded through Prop 1 B Security Funds. One buss will be purchased in FY 2013/14 as well as security cameras for the vehicle. This bus will be purchased using Prop 1 B funds. A new computer server will be purchased with additional hard drive space for the security cameras as the current server is at capacity and does not have enough room for Beaumont Transit's growing needs. Beaumont Transit is changing administrative locations in FY 2013/14. Their current location is still going to be utilized for vehicle maintenance. Improvements will be made to Building D behind the Civic Center to allow for transit dispatch to operate in its new location, Additional cameras will be installed for security at the yard. The City of Beaumont is currently in negotiations to purchase a CNG facility in the area. At this time, Beaumont Transit is unable to publish the details of those negotiations but will keep RCTC staff abreast of those discussions. This past month, staff entered into an agreement with a GIS consultant to design a system -wide map to include all routes in the Pass area. Beaumont Transit anticipates completion including printing and distribution once the COA has been finalized and Council approved. At the end of 2010, staff completed training and implementation on Google Transit, with the assistance of RCTC staff. All bus stops and times are accessible via the web on Google Transit. 15 CHAPTER 3 - PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION Recent Service Changes New Service Routes In FY 2014, a new Commuterlink route (Route 120) will be created to service passengers traveling to and from the San Bernardino Metrolink station as well as the VA Hospital in Loma Linda, with service to Calimesa. This route is currently running to the San Bernardino Metrolink on a reservation only basis but will become a fixed route for FY 2014. Routes 9 and 17 added tripper buses during peak times. An additional bus was added to Routes 3 and 7 which has increased time points for passengers. Route 25 was changed from a demo route to a permanent route. Saturday service increased from two routes to three routes. Beaumont Transit also offers Sunday service with one route. Staff continually reviews existing routes for productivity and for needed improvement to service. Future changes to routes will include adding a bus to existing routes during peak times to accommodate the growing number of passengers in certain identified areas. Marketing Plans and Promotion Efforts have been made to market the Pass Transit System over the past year and will continue in the coming year. These efforts include purchasing advertising on a map of the San Gorgonio Pass Area, distribution of route maps through the utility bills, delivering route maps to the library, chamber of commerce, local businesses and shelters. Route maps have also been placed on all of the buses in map holders. Kiosks have been installed at all bus stop signs with current reaps and time points included. A sub -committee of the Transportation Now Chapter was created in 2009 to address marketing efforts to students in the Pass Area. From that sub -committee, a co- sponsored event between Banning, Beaumont, RTA and the Mt. San Jacinto Community College took place in August to market college students and encourage them to ride mass transit to and from the community college. With that, Pass Transit followed RTA's lead and allowed all GoPass holders to ride Pass Transit free. Staff will continue to support this effort in the coming year. During school orientation, staff met with students and parents to educate them on their transit options in the Pass Area. Beaumont Transit has been invited back for the coming school year and look forward to the upcoming events. A scholarship program was implemented in January 2010 after Beaumont Transit was contacted by a local family and the school district seeking assistance in transporting two students from the Banning Midway area to Beaumont High School. Staff met with the family and agreed upon a series of transit related assignments to be performed and completed in exchange for monthly bus passes. From that, a committee was formed to 16 set criteria, receive applications, and monitor the progress of the recipients. Council formally adopted the program for the FY 2013 school year. Due to the increased use of smartphones as means for getting information, Beaumont Transit now offers text message updates which allow for riders to be informed of any route delays or changes. QR codes have also been placed on all route maps and can be scanned from any bus stop. This takes you directly to the route maps to allow riders to quickly access timetables and route information. The following marketing efforts will be undertaken to promote ridership growth. 1. Continue outreach programs to schools and at community events. 2. Attend senior community meetings to provide information. 3. Participate in the Mt. San Jacinto Jr. College GO -PASS Program to encourage ridership of college students. 4. Enclose flyers with transit information in city utility bills. 5. Meetings will be held with representatives from the local veteran advocate agencies and March Air Reserve Base to increase active and retired military ridership. The City of Beaumont website, www.ci.beaumont.ca.us, provides basic Pass Transit route and schedule information. Additionally, a link to Google Transit is on the web page. Transit staff is currently working to make information about routes and services more accessible. Customers can submit comments, complaints, concerns and suggestions through the city website. CHAPTER 4 - FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS Operating and Capital Budget Although the State reduction in funding has adversely impacted Beaumont Transit's operating budget, staff feels confident that all of the following will greatly improve its operations and that Beaumont Transit will be able to meet the budget limitations set by the State: • Continue to concentrate on marketing the youth in the Pass Area to increase ridership. • Increase marketing to local enlisted armed service members and veterans to cover overhead costs of Commuterlink 120. • Re -organize routes to better accommodate ridership and reduce overhead costs. • Offer more information on system routes with extended customer service hours. • Implement recommendations from the COA. • Increased operating costs are expected due to the addition of Route 120 and the associated fuel and maintenance costs, the hiring of a CSC I and Lead Mechanic, and the purchase and installation of an upgraded phone system. 17 Budget Comparison Budget Item Salaries/Benefits Materials/Supplies Fuel Maintenance Other Expenses Total FY 2012/13 SRTP $950,000 $110,500 $175, 000 $182, 000 $0 $1,417, 500 FY 2013/14 SRTP Plan $1, 271, 500 $150, 575 $290, 751 $207, 099 $45, 485 $1,965,410 Variance $ Amount $321,500 $40, 075 $115,751 $25,099 $45, 485 $547,910 % Increase/ Decrease 34% 36% 66 % 14% 100 % 39% Capital Improvement projects as listed in Table 4 are needed to accommodate this growing transit system. To continue to provide service to so many passengers, buses must be purchased, shelters must be installed, and improvements must be made to increase administrative function. It is projected that this will be Beaumont's year of growth, and that the next few Fiscal Years will see a drastic decrease in capital improvements. Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program Capital projects are funded through STA funds and Proposition 1 B grants for Beaumont. Operating costs are funded through LTF and Farebox Revenues. Regulatory and Compliance Requirements The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 The Dial -A -Ride services provide ADA complementary paratransit service for the fixed route services. The system uses a self -certification process with professional verification. The Pass Area Transit has allowed RTA to certify its ADA passengers and work under the umbrella of RTA's ADA policy as a provider of ADA paratransit. Title VI The Pass Transit System does not utilize federal funds for operating expenses. As such, Title VI requirements do not currently apply to the transit system. Alternatively Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policy) The Pass Transit System operates CNG-powered buses on multiple fixed -routes. The balance of the system's revenue service vehicles is diesel and gasoline -powered. Future vehicle purchases will be in compliance with the RCTC and SCAQMD policies regarding alternative fuel transit vehicles. CNG fueling stations are available in both cities which will assist with expanded fueling needs and fast fueling capability. STA Compliance At this time, Beaumont does not utilize State Transit Assistance (STA) funding for operating expenses. As such, compliance with the Public Utilities Commission requirement is not applicable. 18 TABLE 1 FLEET INVENTORY FY 2013/2014 Zdo T a6ed £TOzlz/S w,aa6eue`y ..peusuesl -179S'ST T 80S1K6 b99'66L 0 8 9T 90Z :mewl E6S`OS 9a7168Z 000`LT 8EZ`LT T8T'EZ ELS'fiT ELE'LZZ 17ZT'S8Z E6S'OS 9Z17'68Z 000`LT 8EZ`LT T8T'EZ ELSIK ELE'LZZ AZT `98Z LZE'TE I9-I/OLZ 99E'6TZ OZ9`8a ND VD dJ VD VD VD VD Aa ZE VZ EE EE EE EE 17Z ZE 8Z t7T OE OE OE OE bT OE 2115 DDJ N09 Nag Na3 NO9 Nag N43 NCO NO3 N43 92ISD 999 600Z TOOZ TTOZ TTOZ TTOZ TTaz SOOZ 000Z £I/ZTOZ Ad (yaaeW '.6.a) a;ea-of-aeaA TO sV aloNaA en!Tad Jed sal! W auu!Tain e6eaand £T/ZTOZ Ad yaaeW Onaun sallW ala!yan oleo 04 ails ZT/TIOZ Ad £T/ZIOZ AA £T/ZTOZ aPaD pu3 aeaA acipd sala!yan Ai aclAi sane ala!yan Aaua6u!TuoD sahlyan long alea oT em do # ampy �o # y1,bual ala!yan padd!nb3 AlpedeD dwell 6uReas PUe T1!� apop IaPoW apoa TI!n9 •6;lnl aeaA pamadp RiPaa!a / (sngaolow) sng auouineas io ki!D ueid a6ueb poNS PTATDZ Ad itialueAul jaam - awl ' J-13"1062741xN'ayaPPu1 Table I - Fleet Inventory FY2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan City of Beaumont Demand Response / Directly Operated Year Mfg. Model Built Code Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length # of Active # of Fuel Vehicles Contingency Type FY Vehicles Code 2012/13 FY 2012/13 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2010 2010 2010 2001 FRD FRD FRD GCC Ford E450 Ford E-450 Ford E-450 Ford E-450 16 16 16 16 2 2 2 2 24 24 24 24 GA GA GA GA 1 1 1 1 0 62,392 0 46,628 0 43,298 0 264,634 95,271 65,233 63,966 276,018 95,271 65,233 63,966 276,018 Totals: 64 8 4 0 416,952 500,488 125,122 TransTrack Managermi 5/2/2013 Page 2 of 2 TABLE 2 SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/2014 ifiVp: Table 2 -- City of Beaumont -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan) All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 13 13 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,233,381 $1,448,568 $1,417,500 $1,163,732 $1,919,926 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $215,229 $188,568 $179,280 $251,277 $196,540 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,018,152 $1,260,000 $1,238,220 $912,454 $1,723,386 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 169,665 183,176 184,256 154,117 211,644 Passenger Miles 345,935 369,450 367,291 308,958 423,506 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 15,856.4 16,644.3 16,215.0 15,110.1 20,614,0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 228,901.0 251,191.8 233,134.0 236,374.0 319,868.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 243,657.3 276,868.8 256,919.0 256,797.0 355,872.0 Performance Characteristics . Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $77.78 $87.03 $87.42 $77.02 $93.14 Farebox Recovery Ratio 17.45 % 13.02 % 12.64 % 21.59 % 10.23 Subsidy per Passenger $6.00 $6.88 $6.72 $5.92 $8.14 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.94 $3.41 $3.37 $2.95 $4.07 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $64.21 $75.70 $76.36 $60.39 $83.60 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.45 $5.02 $5.31 $3.86 $5.39 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 10.7 11.0 11.4 10.2 10.3 I Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.74 0.73 0.79 0.65 0.66 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Managerrm S/770(111 Page 1 of I jit Table 2 -- City of Beaumont -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/ 14 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 8 8 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $173,531 $240,180 $626,100 $197,087 $1,139,739 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $50,154 $65,775 $100,140 $61,525 $111,262 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $123,378 $174,405 $525,960 $135,562 $1,028,477 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 57,631 75,169 104,029 r 41,696 119,927 Passenger Miles 109,499 142,821 197,655 79,222 227,862 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 2,047.5 2,572.9 5,189.0 3,406.5 12,030.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 35,927.0 45,460.0 82,414.0 54,669.0 176,573.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 42,038.9 61,613.0 98,547.0 63,039.0 197,666.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $84.75 $93.35 $120.66 $57.86 $94.74 Farebox Recovery Ratio 28.90 % 27.39 % 15.99 % 31.22 % 9.76 Subsidy per Passenger $2.14 $2.32 $5.06 $3.25 $8.58 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.13 $1.22 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $60.26 $67.79 01.36 $101.36 39.80 $39.80 85.59 $85.49 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.43 $3.84 $6.38 $2.48 $5.82 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 28.1 29.2 20.0 12.2 10.0 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.60 1.65 1.26 0.76 0.68 a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Managerm s1770ni Page 1 of 1 r i=m. Table 2 -- City of Beaumont -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2010/ 11 Audited FY 2011/ 12 Audited FY 2012/ 13 Plan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 5 5 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,059,850 $1,208,388 $791,400 $966,645 $780,187 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $165,075 $122,793 $79,140 $189,753 $85,278 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $894,775 $1,085,596 $712,260 $776,892 $694,909 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 112,034 108,007 80,227 112,421 91,717 Passenger Miles 236,436 226,629 169,636 229,735 195,644 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 13,808.9 14,071.4 11,026.0 11,703.6 8,584.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 192,974.0 205,731.8 150,720.0 181,705.0 143,295.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 201,618.4 215,255.8 158,372.0 193,758.0 158,206.0 Performance Characteristics _ Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $76.75 $85.88 $71.78 $82.59 $90.89 Farebox Recovery Ratio 15.58 % 10.16 % 10.00 % 19.63 % 10.93 % Subsidy per Passenger $7.99 $10.05 $8.88 $6.91 $7.58 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.78 $4.79 $4.20 $3.38 $3.55 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $64.80 $77.15 $64.60 $66.38 $80.95 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.64 $5.28 $4.73 $4.28 $4.85 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 8.1 7.7 7.3 9.6 10.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.58 0.53 0.53 0.62 0.64 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'?" gmonr i Page 1 of 1 Table 2 -- Beaumont -BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes ,Fleet FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 10 11 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $889,114 $1,124,829 $1,135,500 $821,007 $1,747,133 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $194,706 $149,435 $151,080 $226,938 $186,803 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $694,408 $975,394 $984,420 $594,070 $1,560,330 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 148,988 164,390 169,164 139,963 192,206 Passenger Miles 283,077 312,341 321,411 265,930 365,192 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 12,097.3 12,799.3 12,431.0 12,568.7 17,124,0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 183,214.0 205,444.8 189,014.0 202,707.0 273,632.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 195,076.5 226,276.8 209,322.0 219,842.0 304,250.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $73.50 $87.88 $91.34 $65.32 $102.03 Farebox Recovery Ratio 21.90 % 13.29 % 13.30 % 27.64 % 10.69 % Subsidy per Passenger $4.66 $5.93 $5.82 $4.24 $8.12 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.45 $3.12 $3.06 $2.23 $4.27 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $57.40 $76.21 $79.19 $47.27 $91.12 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.79 $4.75 $5.21 $2.93 $5.70 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 12.3 12.8 13.6 11.1 11.2 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.81 0.80 0.89 0.69 0.70 a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Managerrm sn)r?na3 Page 1 of I IE rMR Table 2 -- Beaumont-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 3 z Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $344,267 $323,739 $282,000 $342,724 $172,793 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $20,523 $39,133 $28,200 $24,340 $9,737 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $323,744 $284,606 $253,800 $318,385 $163,056 Operating Characteristics _ Unlinked Passenger Trips 20,677 18,786 15,092 14,154 19,438 Passenger Miles 62,858 57,109 45,880 43,028 58,314 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 3,759.1 3,845.0 3,784.0 2,541.4 3,490.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 45,687.0 45,747.0 44,120.0 33,667.0 46,236.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 48,580.8 50,592.0 47,597.0 36,955.0 51,622.0 Performance Characteristics _ Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $91.58 $84.20 $74.52 $134.86 $49.51 Farebox Recovery Ratio 5.96 % 12.09 % 10.00 % 7.10 % 5.63 % Subsidy per Passenger $15.66 $15.15 $16.82 $22.49 $8.39 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $5.15 $4.98 $5.53 $7.40 $2.80 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $86.12 $74,02 $67.07 $125.28 $46.72 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $7.09 $6.22 $5.75 $9.46 $3.53 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 5.5 4.9 4.0 5.6 5.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.45 0.41 0.34 0.42 0.42 a) Train Hours for Rail Modes t b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Managerrm sr??nni. Page 1 of 1 Beaumont Transit FY 2013/14-FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Table 2A — Excluded Routes Route # Mode (FR/DR) Service Type (DO/CO) Route Description Date of Implementation Exemption End Date 3 FR DO Wal-Mart shopping center, Sundance, BHS August, 2012 August, 2015 4 FR DO Wal-Mart shopping center, Hospital, 6th, Beaumont Ave, Pennsylvania, BHS January, 2012 January, 2015 7 FR DO Oak Valley Pkwy, Palmer, Cherry Valley, Brookside, Beaumont Ave _ August, 2012 August, 2015 11 FR DO Banning Midway, 6th Street, Downtown, BHS November, 2010 November, 2013 25 FR DO Beaumont Ave, Palm , Oak Valley Pkwy, 6th St., Highland Springs, Wal-Mart June, 2012 June, 2015 120 FR DO Wal-Mart, Calimesa Stater Brothers, San Bernardino Metrolink, Loma Linda VA Hospital July 2013 July 1, 2015 Excluded routes are new routes or new service extensions that are eligible for exemption from the farebox recovery requirements. 1 TABLE 3 SliTP Route Statistics FY 2013/2014 ZJo I abed 98E'£ZL'T$ ObS'961$ 9Z6'6161$ 07L8'SSE Eugltzls ,,,,,Jabeue`y 1..3e lsuell 0'898'6IE O'£ET'EZ O'bT9'0Z 90S'£Zb 14,9'TTZ ET slelol aapin0ad 00111aag 950'£91$ LEL'6$ E6L'ZLT$ 07Z9'TS 0'9£Z`96 LO6'LZT$ ZZb'LT$ 6ZE`SbT$ O'£08'8 O'L88'S £96`L9Z$ bLE'6Z$ LE£'L6Z$ O'SOT'b£ O'959'9Z LbS`BEZ$ bZ£'ZE$ TL8`06Z$ O'EZZ`95 07ZT'17S E6L`90E$ S6Z'O£$ 880`LE£$ 0'68Z'Lb 0'80L'Eb SSZ$ST$ 69I`ZT$ 17Z17'991$ O'Sb£'Sb O'O5L'£b ZTS'69Z$ 6178'8£$ T9£'80E$ 0'££8'6L O'LZB'8L b£b'bET$ OLZ'6T$ bOL'EST$ 0'8176'LT O'Sb£'ZT S££'Z$ LSO'T$ Z6£'E$ 0'999'0T O'Lb0'S b85`8£$ £b0'9$ LZ9'bb$ 0'556`£ 0•06r£ O'8bT'b 0'06b'E bTE'85 B£b'6T OWL O'LLb L68'Z£ bIE'LT 0'££L'T O'bLZ'T Z80'LS Eb0'OE O'£LT'b O'ZLO'b 9E9'L9 865'5£ 0'98E'E O'LZZ`E TSE'69 698`££ 0'56T'E 0'660'E 996`LZ 6IL'bT 0'06017 O'SLS'E b6Z`L9 8Tb'SE O'L£0'T O'ZbL 6£T'L£ LbS'6T 01,8Z 0'6ZT BLS bO£ O'S6Z 0'6ZZ 617Z'OT b6£'S Z 12401 IIV0-V38 i I nol 6-tl39 Z IE401 &V38 T Iplol b-tl38 Z 1elo1 £-V39 i IMI SZ-V38 i Idol Z-V39 T Idol LT-V39 I2401 OZT-tl38 T Ngol TT-tl38 Apisgng aaN DTI uanab 4s03 sapw sang sanoH SanoH aa6uassed 6upeaado Ielol anuanab Ie401 anuanab 501114 aa6uassed Saa6uassed sapigm >lead adAl Aea # a;nob sauawa13 ellea sa;nob IIV bT/£TOZ A� Z -- wouwnea8 jo I� s ispejs apwli d1ZIS - a19e1 r o e a6ed ETOZITZ/5 t„,Ja6euehr.yaeJlsueu 99'0 POT 6£'5$ 09'£8$ LO'b$ EZ'OT LO'6$ 00'9$ brE6$ stem. Jam/tad ozopuos Zb'0 b6'Z £T'T 99'0 LL'0 bE'0 Sb'o 95' T 90'0 69' T 9's £'9E 9'EZ L'9 S'OT L'b T'6 E'9Z b'Z 9'EZ E5'E$ EL'TZ$ 50'OT$ 9L'b$ ZO'L$ £S'E$ zbE$ 69'03 9v0$ EL'TT$ ze9b$ ST'99Z$ EE'0TZ$ 6b'£9$ LO'56$ 8L'6b$ 55'69$ 8i'T8T$ 0T'8T$ 6b'89T$ 097$ 68'E$ 6914 Z8'E$ LL'b$ ZS'S$ 0014 Z9'E$ b0'b$ 9L'E$ 6E'8$ 6E'L$ Z6'8$ 9Z'L$ 90'6$ 8b'0T$ T91$ 88.9$ 89'L$ suL$ % £9'S % 86'TT 0/0 L8'6 % TT"TT % 86'8 % TE'L % 65'ZT % ES'zi % 9T'TE % b5'ET 68'9$ 6E'8$ 06'6$ LT'8$ 56'6$ TE'TT$ TL'8$ 98'L$ 9i'Ti$ LZ'8$ bL'E$ TS'6b$ 1e101 aVq-V39 6917z$ L9170E$ IeT01 6-V39 ST'TT$ 6£'EEZ$ 1e301 L-V39 LE'S$ £b'TL$ 1e101 b-V39 TL'L$ 96170T$ le40i E-V39 08'E$ OL'ES$ IeT01 SZ-V39 T6'E$ 85'6L$ 1e401 Z-V39 SvzT$ 51706 1eT01 LT-V38 L9'0$ 6Z'9Z$ 1elol OZT-V39 95'ET$ 881,6T$ leaol TT-V39 al!W gad anoH iad an0H aEIW Aa6uassed °Rea Aa6uassed auk! anuanaa _mom anuanab adAl Aea # a;nob sia6uassed mo6uassed anuanab anuanab aa6uassed gad Appgns /Vanoaaa ,ad 3seD Jed;s0D aad as0D aad Appgns aad Appgns Aad Appgns xogaed 6uguodp 6uReiad0 sat:4231Ni aaueumpad sa;nod !iv VT/Ezaz Ai Z--;uouineag;o IU!D sons ms amoz/ dnys - £ amel Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions Line Route Description Areas/Sites Serviced 2 Wal-Mart shopping center west to Beaumont then east to Cabazon via 6th Street/Ramsey St. 2nd Street Marketplace shopping center and transfer point to RTA, San Gorgonio hospital, Beaumont Civic Center, banks, downtown Beaumont, Wellwood Child Care, Three Rings Ranch, Noble Creek Park District, Oak Valley Community, Stater Bros./Walgreens shopping center, Orchard Park Apartments, Sports Park, shopping/restaurants along 6th Street, Mt. View and San Gorgonio middle schools, Palm Elementary, Beaver Medical Clinic, DPSS, Banning City Hall, unincorporated Cabazon, Desert Hills outlet mall, Cabazon outlet Mall, and Morongo Resort Casino 3 Wal-Mart shopping center then north through Sundance community to Beaumont High School with immediate return via the same route 2nd Street Marketplace shopping center and transfer to RTA, San Gorgonio hospital, Sundance elementary, Sundance Community, Orchard Park Apartments, Mt. View and San Gorgonio middle schools, Sports Park, Cherry Valley, and Beaumont High School 4 Wal-Mart shopping center then north to hospital, west via 6th Street then north on Beaumont Ave., south on Pennsylvania 2nd Street Marketplace shopping center and transfer point to RTA, San Gorgonio hospital, Beaumont Civic Center, banks, downtown Beaumont, library, Stater Bros./Walgreens shopping center, Orchard Park Apartments, Sports Park, shopping/restaurants along 6th Street and Beaumont Ave, Mt. View and San Gorgonio middle schools, and various apartment complexes 7 Oak Valley Parkway, Palmer, Cherry Valley Blvd, Brookside, Beaumont Ave back to Oak Valley and repeat loop. Fairway Canyon, Tournament Hills, Beaumont High, Mt. View Middle School, San Gorgonio Middle school, Oak Valley Greens, Oak Valley Shopping Center, Stetson community, and Cherry Valley 9 WalMart shopping center to Seneca Springs, north on Pennsylvania to Palm Ave. and continuing north on Beaumont Ave. WalMart and 2nd Street Marketplace, Seneca Springs community, four Seasons Active Retirement community, Loma Linda Medical Center, San Gorgonio Middle School, Oak Valley Shopping Center, Mt. View Middle School, and Beaumont High School 11 Banning Midway west via 6th Street to downtown and north to high school Banning Midway, San Gorgonio Hospital, Noble Creek Apts., Civic Center, Three Rings Ranch, Oak Valley Community, Cherry Valley, Beaumont High School, Mt. View Middle School 17 Cherry Valley Blvd, Champions, Desert Lawn, Brookside, Beaumont Ave, Cougar Way, Oak Valley Parkway and repeat loop. Fairway Canyon, Tournament Hills, Brookside Elementary, Beaumont High School, Mt. View Middle School, and Stater Bros shopping center. 25 Beaumont Ave, Palm, Oak Valley Parkway, 6`n Street, Highland Springs, Wal-Mart shopping center, Beaumont Ave and repeat loop. Central Beaumont and local shopping centers 40 Xenia, 6th, 8tn California, Wellwood, Elm, Three Rings Ranch, Brookside Lane, Beaumont Ave, Cougar, Cherry Valley Blvd, Noble, Vineland, Palm, Pennsylvania, 10`h, Palm, Stewart Park, and repeat loop. Noble Creek Apartments, Downtown Beaumont, Food-4-Less, Stater Brothers, Civic Center, Beaumont Library, New Hope, Three Rings Ranch, Orchard Park Apartments, Beaumont High, Cherry Valley Market, Chatigny Rec Center, Stewart Park and back. 120 Wal-Mart to San Bernardino Metrolink Commuter Link with direct service from Wal- Mart to San Bernadino Metrolink and back. TABLE 4 Funds Request FY 2013/2014 City of Beaumont FY 2013/14 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY-2013/14 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF I STA I Prop 18 (PTMISEA) Prop 1 B Security Measure A Fare Box I Other Operating Expenses $1,919,925 $1,723,385 $196,540 COA $45,485 $45,485 Subtotal: Operating $1,965,410 $1,768,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $196,540 $0 CNG station improvements FY 14-01 $100,000 $100,000 Campus Cameras (FY 12113 Prop. 1 B CTSG FY 14-02 $120,000 $101,267 $18,733 Building D Improvements FY 14-03 $75,000 $75,000 Upgrade Panasonic in -car video system FY 14-04 $50,000 $50,000 Bus Shelters (FY 10111 Prop. 1 B Security) FY 14-05 $18,370 $18,370 Bus Shelter Installation for FY14-06 (Prop. IB : FY 14-06 $18,368 $18,368 1 Type H coach (Route 120) (Prop. 1B Capital FY 14-07 $441,223 $441,223 Security cameras for FY14-08 FY 14-08 $17,928 $17,928 Subtotal: Capital $840,889 $0 $326,267 $459,151 $55,471 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $2,806,299 $1,768,870 $326,267 $459,151 $55,471 $0 $196,540 $0 Revised 5/23/2013 Summary of FY 2013/14 Funds Requested.xls SRTP FY 13-14 Table 4 — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-01 PROJECT NAME CNG Station Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION CNG station acquired from confidential seller. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION CNG station needs equipment upgrades. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA Funds $100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER None PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-02 PROJECT NAME Campus Cameras PROJECT DESCRIPTION Security Cameras are to be installed in the area surrounding the yard and dispatch offices. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION There is currently no security in case of vandalism or theft. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA Funds $ 101,267.00 Prop. 1B Security Grant Funds $ 18,733 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER None. PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-03 PROJECT NAME Building Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project will include improvements to Building D which will house the transit department as part of the City Campus project. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The transit office is over 60 years old and needs to be relocated. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA Funds $75,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER None PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-04 PROJECT NAME Upgrade Panasonic in -car video systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION A larger hard drive is required for the in -car video systems. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current server is too small to support the current video system. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA Funds $50,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER The City of Beaumont requested STA funds under the FY 11/12 SRTP to complete a GPS upgrade, however, this request for funding is being shifted to an upgrade of the Panasonic in -car video systems under the FY 13/14 SRTP in order to spend out these funds within the allotted time period. PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-05 PROJECT NAME Bus Shelters PROJECT DESCRIPTION 17 shelters and 10 benches will be purchased to place throughout the City. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The City has very few shelters and with ridership increasing it will be beneficial to place shelters/benches along major streets. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1B PTMISEA Funds $165,834 Breakdown of Funds by Fiscal Year: FY 07/08-$7,171 FY 08/09-$38,133 FY 09/ 10-$102,877 FY 10/11-$17,653 Total unspent Prop. 1B PTMISEA funds for Shelter Upgrades: $165,834 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER The City of Beaumont requested funding in previous SRTP cycles for shelter upgrades using Prop. 1B PTMISEA funds, however, due to road construction through the City, these projects were delayed. The City will spend out the remainder of the unspent funds on a comprehensive shelter upgrade project. PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-06 PROJECT NAME Bus Shelters Installations PROJECT DESCRIPTION 17 shelters and 10 benches will be purchased to place throughout the City and need to be installed. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The City has very few shelters and with ridership increasing it will be beneficial to place shelters/benches along major streets. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1B Security Funds FY 11/12- $18,368 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER The City of Beaumont requested funding in previous SRTP cycles for shelter upgrades using Prop. 1B PTMISEA funds, however, due to road construction through the City, these projects were delayed. The City will spend out the remainder of the unspent funds on a comprehensive shelter upgrade project, which will include equipment procurement as well as installation. PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-07 PROJECT NAME Procure 1 Type H coach PROJECT DESCRIPTION Type H coach to replace auctioned vehicles PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Beaumont Transit will need to replace auctioned vehicles. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1 B PTMISEA Funds $441,223 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER None PROJECT NUMBER FY 14-08 PROJECT NAME Security cameras for 1 Type H coach PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Type H coach to be purchased will need a security system PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Beaumont Transit currently has security cameras in all FR and DAR vehicles. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1B PTMISEA FY 10/11 S17,928 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER None TABLE 5.1 Funds Request FY 2014/2015 six•palsanbaa spun] 511171.0Z Ad }a /uewwnS EIOZ/l/5 pesinaa 0$ Z65` LOZ$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 000`00E$ 6ZE`17 L8` L$ LZ6`5 LE`Z$ lg;ideo 1g 6ugglad() :ie;oy as os o$ o$ as 000'ooE$ o$ 000'ooE$ lemdeo :Ieloigns 000`00E$ 000`0DE$ 10-g I U luewaoeidai/uoisusdxa Jo} sesnq L adAl Z 0$ Z65'I0Z$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 6ZE171-8`I$ IZ6`41-0'Z$ BuRe edp :IBlogins Z65'I0Z$ 6ZE'Vl8'1-$ IZ6'SI0`Z$ sasuadx36ulieiado czr Ja430 xog aced y aanseayAl Alunoas g l doid (V3S1Wld) 0 l doted V1S All spund }o lunowy piol (0 aagwnN loafoad ieudeo UNdpOSea 10a[Oad 914171.0Z Ad Jo; palsanbe8 spund ;o Liewwns - L•g angel ue�d lisuou ebueu 1'011S palsenbay spund }o ket.uwng $IIbLOZ Ad luownsag ;o Apo SRTP FY 13-14 TABLE 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY 15-01 PROJECT NAME Procure 2 Type VII buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 Type VII buses are planned to be procured for replacement/expansion PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This type of bus is needed for utilizing on routes. PROTECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA Funds $300,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER None TABLE 5,2 Funds Request FY 2015/2016 slx.palsenbaa spund 9 L/9 LOZ Ad )0 /GewwnS E1,03/115 PesVold 0$ ZL9` L LZ$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 000`00£$ Sb0`906` L$ L LL`9 Ltt$ leude3 Ig Buns'ado :lelol o$ Os o$ o$ o$ 000`ooes o$ 000'ooE$ pp:leo :ie;o;gns 000'006$ 000`00E$ uopuedxeaueweoeidaa aol sasnq L ad(1 Z 0$ ZL9'LLZS 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 900'906'1$ 111`9LL`Z$ 6uwad° :le}o}gns 3L9' L 13$ 5170'506` L$ L LL'9 L L'Z$ sesuedx3 6uneiad0 0 JaUtO x09 aced y emseeW Llunoes e L doid (b'3SI1/41d) 9 f dold b'1S 311 spund to lunowy levu (G) ,fegwnN pefoid fel!de0 uandPOsap 1.00f0ad 9USLOZ AA -104 pa;sanbaH spund lGo Liewwns - Z'S algel ueld llsueal obuelj pugs palsonbeu spund )o kieww0S 9 f/5 LOZ Ad luowneag to ��f� SRTP FY 13-14 TABLE 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY 16-01 PROJECT NAME Procure 2 Type VII buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 Type VII buses are planned to be procured for replacement/expansion PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This type of bus is needed for utilizing on routes. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA Funds $300,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER None TABLE 6 Triennial Performance Audit FY 2013/2014 City of Beaumont Transit System SRTP 13-14 TABLE 6 — PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Audit Recommendations (Covering FY 2007 — FY 2009) 1. Need to ensure that the State Controller Reports are completed and submitted in a timely manner. Recommendation to implement policies and procedures to ensure that the State Controller Reports are prepared and submitted in a timely manner as required by PUC Section 99243. Action(s) Taken And Results (1) COMPLETED. Procedures are in place to prevent further delays in completion of these important documents. (1) If no action taken, provide schedule for implementation or explanation of why the recommendation is no longer relevant. TABLE 7 Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2013/2014 :r. 'a i'.G-+'. 'PI. "'.fIC-:`i'."''•:':11 IlEmo Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Deport FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Beaumont Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 184,256 Passenger Miles 367,291 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 16,215.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 233,134.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 256,919.0 Total Operating Expenses $1,417,500 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $179,280 Net Operating Expenses $1,238,220 Performance Indicators _ Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 12.64 %I >= 10.00% 1 21.59 %I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $87.42 <_ $62.99 $77.02 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $6.72 >_ $4.02 and <_ $5.44 $5.92 Fails to Meet Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $3.37 >_ $2.00 and <_ $2.70 $2.95 Fails to Meet Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $76.36 >_ $44.47 and <_ $60.17 $60.39 Fails to Meet Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile . $5.31 >_ $2.98 and <= $4.04 $3.86 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 11.40 >= 9.44 and <= 12.77 10.20 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.79 >= 0.63 and <= 0.85 0.65 Meets Target• Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary PerFormance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: The implementation of Route 120 for FY 12/13 as an on demand route has increased costs for this fiscal year. The General Fund had to subsidize $138,000 to assist with costs due to this route. Beaumont Transit employees continue to have a benefit -rich employment package which contributes significantly to overhead costs. TransTrack Manager rm sn?nm i Page 1 of 1 1 TABLE 8 SIM Performance Report FY 2013/2014 4Z) MN TM - -- FY 2013/14 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider: City of Beaumont All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2011/12 End of Year Actual FY 2012/13 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2013/14 Plan FY 2013/14 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 183,176 154,117 211,644 None Passenger Miles 369,450 308,958 423,506 None Revenue Hours 16,644.3 15,110.1 20,614.0 None Total Hours 18,493.2 16,859.8 23,133.0 None Revenue Miles 251,191.8 236,374.0 319,868.0 None Total Miles 276,868.8 256,797.0 355,872.0 None Operating Costs $1,448,568 $1,163,732 $1,919,926 None Passenger Revenue $188,568 $251,277 $196,540 None Operating Subsidy $1,260,000 .. $912,454 $1,723,386 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $87.03 $77.02 $93.14 <= $78.73 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $5.77 $4.92 $6.00 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $7.91 $7.55 $9.07 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 13.02 % 21.59 % 10.23 % >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $6.88 $5.92 $8.14 >= $5.03 and <= $6.81 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $3.41 $2.95 $4.07 >= $2.51 and <= $3.39 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $75.70 $60.39 $83.60 >= $51.33 and <= $69.45 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $5.02 $3.86 $5.39 >= $3.28 and <= $4.44 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 11.00 10.20 10.30 >= 8.67 and <= 11.73 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.73 , 0.65 0.66 >= 0.55 and <= 0.75 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2013/14 Plan to the FY 2013/14 Primary Target. Service Provider Comments: For FY 2013/14, Beaumont has increased operating costs due to the addition of Route 120 as a Fixed Route Service. Also included in the costs are the addition of a full time CSC I and a Lead Mechanic Both positions will be added July, 2013. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 9 Highlights of Short Range Transit Plan FY 2013/2014 Table 9 HIGHLIGHTS OF SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • Complete a Comprehensive Operations Analysis in conjunction with the City of Banning, RTA and Sunline. • Implement minor route changes to existing routes to increase service and improve customer service. • Hiring of lead mechanic for increased fleet numbers and service hours. • Hiring of CSC I for increased call volume and service hours. • Increase bus service on current routes by adding additional buses at peak times. • Increase service regionally to San Bernardino County. • Coordinate Tenant Improvements on existing Transit office. • Install more bus shelters and bus benches throughout service area to improve and enhance service provided with the city of Beaumont. • Expand outreach efforts to senior citizen organizations, schools and major employers. • Expand outreach efforts to veterans and active service members. • Finalize and print a system -wide map showing all Beaumont and Banning routes. • Continue to work with the City of Banning to improve coordination of routes, schedules, passenger amenities, and fares to ensure that Pass Transit is seamless and simple to use by Pass Area residents. Operating and Financial Data FY 09/10 Audited FY 10/11 Audited FY 11/12 Audited FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Planned Systemwide Ridership 141,629 169,665 183,176 205,489 211,644 Operating Costs per Revenue Hour $79.35 $77.78 $87.03 $90.48 $93.14 Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Poiicy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2011/12 Audit FY 12/13 (Estimate) FY 13/14 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 188,568 251,277 196,540 2.Interest - 3. General Fund Supplement - 4. Measure A - 5. Advertising Revenue - 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets - 7. CNG Revenue - - 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - - 10. Investment Income - 11. CalPers CERBT - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - 13. Other Revenues - TOTAL REVENUE 188,568 251,277 196,540 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1,448,568 1,163,732 1,919,926 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 13.02% 21.59% 10.24% Eastbound I Beaumont to Cabaz4m., 2 via gib Street and iftanisey Street - . A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD 1 Times are approximate AM PM' a 0.a �C die za U� o �.,B a4 T. . 14 1° E's Q1 4 v IEC �i1c8 `°m og N 2 S G01 C C •�C 3i 0,2_' 6:34 0 5:45 .— 6:00 6:15 6:25 7:45 —.— 8:00 8:15 8:25 8:34 9:45 —.— 10:00 10:15 10-25 10:34 11:45 — _< 12:00 1245 1225 12:34 .4 ti-. ,, :00 2:15 225 2_34 3:45 3:47 4:00 4:15 1.25 4, 4 5:45 . 6:00 it, . ,._ 6 5 6:34 A Westbound I Cabazon to Beaumont Vim ibth Street and Ranisay She A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate :34 4; 34 4:40 1 10:45 11:02 11:15 _ 11:20_ :115 _ 3:02 .45 3:20 4:45 6:02 5:15 :20 6:45 7:0 7' 1' 715 5 FIXED ROUTE FARES I fare Categories 11:30 1:30 5: 30 1 . *N-ret fare ir1igady when bus arrives. Drivers cannot make change. 0w as 3c o mE � a a a O 0 U EO 11:45 1:4 — ��� :45 SAS Base Pare i9iay Pass 1 Tr pOer i 0 Thket Monthly Pass Puncia.PasS Book General Si 15 Youth igfa e51<- .Z Senior las•l.. a?,0.0 S Si 8.0 5,25 1.80 N/A Nl, $ 1 0 Y/A NO, $5.85 NIA 545 T33 Or, y$5 OD y f. I 50 7 1 SD NO. NJA **If you plan to use a senior or disabled discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. OUTE Info: (95 ) 769-8530 www.ciirbeauniontmeasiaS CALIMESA =CM Routes to 3 7 17 Che I 5 11 Oak VallelPkwy 12th Street 'a To CIIERRY VALLEY i.,q Chatigny 1.1, Recreation " Center BEAUMONT Beaumont Civic Center Att, 6th Stree Sac U.1:111,PriCI li135.43iL21 Transfer to I 1 Routes Ir 5 San Gorgonio Hospital Legend I Map not to scale • Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Alternate Route flaming Cot anter ITransfer to 1 , Routes Banning Civic Center 5 Ramse St ihautriati. Civic Caltur LawArer to Wal.Plart Trangre-'5tanon Transfer to Routes 6 25 Wal-Mart .; T ..3 1st _ .••• Highland Aul*V's Medical Plaza Sun Lakes BANNING Casino Morongo Outlet Mall Seminole 143 Desert Hills San Qk Code below for all route Fr:I-I-melon 10.01.2012 Rev. ou hbound I Beaumont High toWall-Mart 3 vale Sa nde(Weekday Service max) A.1- times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD i Times are approximate AM 1P. M i C gm O �2 .21 i a � 1011 0 6:24 7:24 6:28 7:28 tco e o u 6:31 7:31 a5 e U XZ 6:3-3 7:33 A 3 IC) 6:36 7:36 8:24 9:24 10:24 11:24 12:214 1:7,4 _ 2 24, . 8:28 9:28 10:28 11:28 12!7a! ::28 2:29 8:31 9:31 10:31 11:31 12:31 1:31 2:31 .101/gam iL-_ _• _ 4:24 5:26 8:33 9:33 10:33 11:33 17!_3a 12:35 1:33 1.313 2:35 2:39 8:36 9:36 10:36 11 :36 Northbound' Wal-Mart to Beaumont high 3 via Sae carinbag. mwspi#a> lida■ee (Weekday y Service man: A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate 3 0 .O 6 ca 8 c AM 6:36 7:36 8:36 9:36 10:36 11:36 6:52 7:52 8:52 9:52 10:52 11:52 12_12 1552' 2A2' s t 3 ie EA e d d I+ p 4a4 0 Li 6:58 7:58 8:58 9:58 10:58 7:02 8:02 9:02 10:02 11:02 11:58 �p1:ox 12:59 1:02 1;88 2:02 01:5 9 :ga4 FIXED ROUTE FARES I Have s act fcannot snake Care � s�bus arrilvrs. drive FAN C8a<eg0nes Base Fara General Child (46" tall or under with paying adult) Zone/Deviations $1.15 S,65 $.25 $.25 N/A 1 6;1<'Oppar PLi nip 11 Pass reA NIA NIA NIA N/A 7:06 8:06 9:06 10:06 11:06 12:O9. - r 1: A 2:09 3= 19., S10.35 $ib 00 $5_85 • N/A N/A $ 21.50 N/A N/A **If you plan to use a senior or disabled discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. OUTE 3 Info; (IP 51) 769.85 3 wrlri •Ibeaunteinticasses Vineland Ave Che , _ Valley Blvd rn m: r!Oil 5Mild Transfer to Routes 2 7 d a4.1 C O sBeaumont sports Park CHERRY VAI,LEY Cherry Valley Market Mt View Middle Sdioal Cougar Vkldy?Dith.arJ Pa* Transfer to Routes Co • a Wa ; San s ; Middle i +a �E iea i ar Chaiigny Recreation Center Lend j Map not to sale Time and/or Transfer Point 11 Transfer Point Oak V I - Parkway r• Anna Neese Elementary ' _ ..—►- f4 WeLteesriipdrtmonls Larm'er to Routes -gar--_ : ';14.''?`5:3: ?.:saw Scan Q1't Code below for all route Information trs Transfer to Ik Routes SUNDANCE Srmdanae Elementary ' Wal- art p 2nd St a� E E 8 1st St ldyhland Springs Medical Nara A s of San Gorgonio Hospital Transfer m 1 2 4 Rixlieyka4A,' S. "� 6 � 11 10.01.2012 Rev. Weekdays s I Downtown Beaumont via Throe Rings Ranch and Wal-Mart A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD Times are approximate AM PM A.M. +�a z 3 7:22 8:22 9:22 10:22 11:22 7:30 8:30 9:30 10:30 0 — is a c7 8 c_ ((tn 01 7:45 8:45 9:45 10:45 11:30 11:45 12:22 J 12:30 12:45 1:22 2:22 3:22 1: 30 1:45 2:30 3:30 2:45 3:45 4:22 5:22 6:22 4: 30 4:45 5:30 5:45 6:30 :45 8:03 9:03 10:03 11:03 121143 1:03 2:03 3:03 4:03 8:06 9:06 10:06 11:OA 12:06 1:06 2:06 :06 4:06 (t) 8:13 9:13 — 10:13 11:13 11:15 _ 1.:13 I 12:15 1:13 /:15 2:13 3:1'3 4:13 :'15 3:15 5:03 6:0 7:03 5:06 6:06 5:13 6;'13 7:O6 7:13 Weekends I Downtown" Beaumont 1. *Sunday service to begin January 8, 2011 2 Wile* -'-"P SUB Ifl t" 1"JAIIV, rim. times are m BOLD 1 Times are approximate A rtnjh i � 3 D aqq C2 211 i w q��j m C O §IJ m�cd et, e 0,) 6 :— —• 8:06 8:13 8:22 8:28 8:45 9:03 9:06 _ 9:13 _ 9:22 9:28 9:45 10:03 10:06 10:13 10:22 10:28 10:45 _ 11:03 11:06 11:13 11:22 11:28 11:45 12:4 12:03 1:03 12:06 12:13 12:22 12; .8 .. 1:06 1:13 122 1:28 1:45 2:03 2:06 :13 I 2:22 - 2:28 - :46 3:03 4:03 3:06 -- 4:0 3:13 :22 J 3:28 ' 3:45 4:1 -" 4:22 j 4:28 �F _ 4:34 4: 52 �— : - rI OU'l'E I o: (950 7 -11 3 MI6 War �y MAdARSchaal Cougar Way/Orchard Perk Transfer to Routes 17 25 Stabs, Waa. Shoppl 'Center Q c 0 E Shwa? Put BtVt , m 6aaua.ant io m TT Clear:1 W 47i 1nation and Polka it i 4 ® 41 m Faaamoat Larmy CD 6th St COUGAR RANCH 1 y lascraaaran Oakiyalley Elirjaaner v c Bedwr10+e` ('JVn ierStL Transfer to Ruu! eg o0m INal-Met TreisferS1210111 Trar;Srf. 1r I r� r 13i 35 Legend Map not to scale • Time and/or Transfer Paint Transfer Point Alternate Routing rimins-plaannliBtli 5- Transfer to Routes l 9 I SUNDANCE 8th St 4 ►t 6th St PoxI4Lsal 7 a _.,* a �U ), Wa �rt C ' s 2nd St Marketplace a E� 01 E _ a ► 1st St Harm aesact tare ready whets byes arrives. FACED ROIPTE FARES rers cannot snake change. are Ca General Rase fare J Day Pass 10•Tripper ic-Ticket nch Pass - - Boom $1.15 Senior (85+).,, Piabi Child {+WB" tall or under wiin (saying adult) $:3.00 3 S 1.80 GO Pass I RIDE FREE r�+l $10 35 Monthly Pas* R K $36.00 1 510.0C ,e S NrA h1lA 1.5.85 MEM N /A N/A $5185 f�1A, �', tom..-... $21.50 N/A **If you plan to use a senior or disabled discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus, You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Rev. 10.01.2012 Tournament hills and Fairway Canyon 7 also serving Stair>rtees and Rite -Aid shopping' A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD' Times are approximate AM d� o ul_ 2 2. e -_ -To ri3 d r = cr � Q' �°° z RHEm =zd0 od d a. .2co .cm U� AL__D —0 0 0 6:35 8:42 6:48 7: 15 7:22 7: 8 —. PM 7-00 7:35 3:10 �d g 30 as E �m 7.0 0 4.1 da o • � To ▪ o� �rt ad A co 0 7:10 7 4C 3:30 I 3: 5 3543 3:36 7.45 3:25 3:40 3:50 3:55 4:00 3:45 :50 3:58 4.0 4.08 4:02 4:07 4: 0 4:15 j 4:20 4:37 :42 5;22 :27 4 :4 4:25 4:30 4:50 ! 4:55 i 5:10 5:13 6' 80 5723 37 4:35 5:20 ROUTE 7 OFFERS WEEKDAY SERVICE ONLY Ro service on: New Year's Dag, Memorial bay, Independence Ray. Labor Dail* Thanksgiving Day and Christmas flay. PHONE NUMBER INDEX CUSTOMER INFORMATION 51) 769-8530 Information abort bus routes, schedules, fares, lost/found and comments. Hours: Mon Tlurs 8 a.m.-el p.m.; Fri 8 a.m.-3 p.m. Additional customer service and information (951) 769-85 0 DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE (951) 769- 5 2 Transportation services for ADA, disabled and active adults over 65 years of age. OTHER FIXED ROUTE SERVICES Amtrak (Nationwide Rail Passenger Service) (800) 87 -7245 Coaster (Rail service in ,San Diego County) 19) 33-3004 Corona Cruiser (Corona bus service) (951) 7 4- 418 Greyhound (Nationwide s ice) (800) 231- 77 Metrolink (Rag Passenger Service) (80D) 371-5465 OCTA (Service throughout Orange aunty) (800) 5-7433 Omniixans (Service thrown Pitestem San Barre, Count) (800) 986-6428 RTA (Service throughout Riverside Count (951) 565-500 Sunllne (Service throughout Palm Springs/Coachella (760) 343-3156 Super Shutde (Service iv Onbvio Airport) ,(909) 467-960D Rev. 06.21.2012 RIM E Info: 31 769-8 3 winw•ci•beaumontoca.us <1:"a CALIMESA BeaumunT H9h Ssrwpl Transfer to Routes mm■ Legend I Map net C[ scaler • Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Alternate Routing CHERRY VALLEY , • • • • • s a Cherry Valley Blvd Ic • g BoIgiseiae- _ - -6 r • • N.\ 4%) • 6 s.4, et. y I 'So. ` \ ne • t 3 010 -�FAIRWAY C -4 r ChamPloms Oat rkwaY x 4. Coaaar Waylarrhon:l Park' Transfer to Routes Hah 11m© Ennu ENTFinis � i s� a ae� cry"` 001 ?el SCSI, Cade beiim for all route information Mt lekW Middle School :8 i cside NON r Way Staler bros. Shopping ee for Rllti.laid1CJ81 Wi[ +V Or Transfer to Routes FIXED 1 11 ' FARE Have mei fare ready when bills erriv ltis. ve rs ean■n t matte change. r are Categories Base Fare General ;31 15 S 65 .66 Child ow tall of under] 5 25 CP Pass I RIDE FREE Day Poss '1 Tripper 10-Tic#cet Mnnthty Pass i Punch Pa.S Book S3 00 NiA S10.35 S3.001 S10.00 AtirON. 5180 h1?A 55.85 fy S1:80 NIA 6.85 2 y i.L NiA NiA NA NiA $36.00 $21.50 **If you plan to use a senior or disabled discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Rev. 06.21.2012 W g • )N1� 4112 1:14 11, • hi O • fir is I 0 ai vs 6 41 i4 O I 0 •w11/ III ■i • I ii L 18 0 mi 16 • • 1 • • • i• g Y 0 2 iv Q C • in a a • 2 3 Oi I0042S 48IH E woruneae 0 PAI9 AaIIeA A lle43 a as � O I` O 00 eAV wownees 0 AeM Je611o0 in (p � I` IS 448 0 DAV eluenlAsuued � dam' 6 V I`-: *led Outudg MOWS 0 Tr 6 LO Cr) I...: AeM elu►a0a8 0 Aemped e;luezueW � I.[M 'r V7 Cfl O c+M I` a �eW-IeM xaed s6ulldS e3auaS AeM alumaig (§) Aemped euuezuew IS 448 0 DAV el u emAseued aAd luownea8 0 AeM Jebnop I0043S 4$IH. wowneae 0 PAIS AelleA Aue43 • CPI M _ jp IF 1 i trt CI) : `i? I` 14.!: O ti Rev. 06.21.2012 info: (951) 769-8530 OUTEwvrw.ciibeaurnonticams Vineiand dterry 14sNey Mete all Blvd Walt Schaal =MI Mt. View Transfer 2 I 3 I 7 I male Routes 11 17 Sepal CHERRY VALLEY cougar YidaviCurnard Part. Transfer to Routes ar Wa San Garpmtia Middle Sdlool 12th DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT r'ent Iv finis Ave; 9ti St L3ral let ' t Rn Leo; penrqvania hidttotbtri Transfer to Routes 4,6 Legtrid I Map not to SCBle Time anchor Transfer Point Transfer Point Alternate Route - Wal-Mart -4- if cn -4- • - . - I tn -o L':!Lsenem c ea 'sprrags Z Part CA t i Have exact rare ready when bus arriveS, FIXED FARES Drivers cannot snake change. Pare Categories. Base fare Day-Pas-s 10:rriplier Punch Pass General $1.15 00 Child (46" tall or under $.25 N/A 11.144Wen Monthly Paw $1135 N/A N/A $36.00 N/A **If you plan to use a senior or disabled discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Rev. 06.21.2012 ROUTE 1 (merry lolled www,clibeaumencemass Basuasaht a MA Scheel tv 0 E Brookside 4 I n NC Kim O Noble yagerams. RAIe,AM deck Pact Shopping Chahar °"mi' Oak Ualleyearkway Mldife Schaal a 4 12th 5t � 'e 10th 5t *Rnue ] 1 cunLn_irLs sealRuute 4 +eamn not 4a Civic Cantor , and Pala z .� 8raflbn 41 0.1 _ ugar Way San Gamma; er mil' 5 6th St SUMDANCE end j Ma .nottu..scake ioTime and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point N San Gorgonio Hospit Transfer to Routes / 8tt t el ►;7_, an a a tin o 1 sa xir ebony � vat.r 2mM:rpast Kganhiatem � c 11 Ramsey z Aster &laci Food 4Lam Weekdays I Banning to Pennfath St 1 1 via Three Flings Ranch and Beaumont High A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate AM 6:0 o EU co A8 6:5 c 7:0 D 7.0e a3 C +• o La G V m ate 7 13 7:22* *ROUTE i I c+autimues serivicevia ROUTE 4 #p WRIAIR rta-SaniGotglini0 Resf piial, mean/ i n:CIvir Ccuirrand Witte no Ranch Rev. 07.24.2012 Tournantent Hills and Fairway Canyon also serving Stater s and Rite -laid shopping A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate AM d o Tog a 6:35 7:20 6: 7: 6 40 6:50 25 7:3 5 2;05 2:50 �� A o 0ds z �m pi WV .15 41/ —' Um 0a 3 0 ac Um d �- L a r2 UU I- CI 6:54 7:00 . 7:05 — . - 7:10 7:40 7:45 7:50 2:10 2:15 j 2:20 3;00 I 3: 5 3:10 3;15 2:25 2: 5 -4 :25 ROUTE 1 7 OFFERS WEEKDAY SERVICE WHEN SCHOOL IS HI SESSION ONLY No service on: Weekends, New' ar's Daly, Memorial Darr, Independence Hay, Labor Day, Thanksgiving bay and Christ ass Day, PHONE NUMBER INDEX CUSTOMER INFORMATION (951) 69-8 30 Information about bus routes, schedules, fares, lost/found and comments. Flours: Mon Thurs 8 a.m.-4 p.m.; Fri 8 a.m.-3 p.m. Additional customer service and information..., (951) 769-8520 DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE 951) 6 - 5 2 Transportation services for ADA, disabled slid active adults over 65 gears of age. OTHER FIXED ROUTE SERVICES Amtrak (Nationwide Rail Passenger .Service 800) 872-7 45 Coaster (Rail service in .San Diego County (61 J) 233-3004 Corona Cruiser (Corona bus ser ice 51 734-9418 Greyhound (Nationwide service). (800) 231-2222 Metrolink (Rail F ssen erService) _. (800) 371-5465 OCTA (Service throughoutOrange County) B00} 636-7433 Ommtrans (.Service throuoh Western San �drro County) (800) 66-64 8 T (Service throughout Riverside rside County) .4951) 565-5002 uniine (Service t wughout Palm Sprin s Coachella (760) 343-3456 Super Shuttle (Service to OntarioAirport).--.�- - 90 ) 467-9600 :ev. 07.12.2012 Info: (95 I ) 769-8530 iwww,cipbeaurnont.ca.us Lelend I Map not to scare fp Time anclior Transfer Point Transfer Point Alternate Routing Beaunwra SchooP Transfer to Routes Brookside Ave \ r§an.ers Scan Code belsw for all route inform micro CHERRY VALLEY cAistiVirsy:/.00t:hurd Transfer to Routes Have eaaem fare ready 'when bus arrives-. FIXED ROUTE FARES I Drivers cannot suable ebairilte. General $1.15 Senior 055+r $;:i t-off $1 tio $1.80 Child (41B° tali or under) S-25 NiA GO Pass I RIDE FREE 10-Tapper 1 0-Tickat Punch Pass Book NirA i N/A **If you plan to use a senior or disabled discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Rev. 07.12.2012 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 26, 2012 2 So1 thbolulnd 1 1i91alHart Shopping Center via Beaumont Ave and OM Street A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD 1 Times are approximate Beaumont Ave & Cougar Way wells Fargo Bank Staters/ Food 4 Less Wal-Mart A M i1i MOW 6 6 7:20 7:30 7:35 7:40 8:00 8:10 8:15 8:20 8:40 8:50 8:55 9:00 9:20 9:30 9:35 9:40 10:00 10:10 10:15 10:20 10:40 10:50 10:55 11:00 11:20 11:30 11:35 11:40 x. ,: - 1210 12:15 12:20 12:40 12:50 - #2:55 1700 1:20 1_30 1:35 1:40 2:00 2:10 2:15 2:20 2:40 -- - 2:50 2;55 3:00 3:26 3:36 3.40 3:45 _4:0_5 4:16. 4:20 4:25 45. It05 6:25 5:35 1 � 6:40 2 5 Northbound I Beaumont Ave @Cougar Wad, via Beaumont Ave and iii th Street A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD j Times are approximate Wal-Mart Beaumont Civic Center Cherry Valley Blvd @ Beaumont High Beaumont Ave & Cougar Way A M Fir T , ' Fp f Fst� � e s 7w%. k r ^Y. i �^� 0 0 0 ,fir 6:50 7:00- 7:10 7:20 7:40 7:50 —:— 8:00 8:20 8:30 :— 8:40 9:00 9:10 —:— 9:20 9:40 9:50 —, 10:00 10:20 10:30 —.— 10:40 11:00 11:10 11:20 11:40 11:50 , . - �_ ° x'- a�,�_ 'ra.c ^ ^` 1.00 1:10 — 1:20 1 :40 1:50 - _ 2:00 2:20 _ 2:30 —.— _ 2:40 3:00_ 3:10 3:20 3'25 g. a 3:55 --- 4:05 F _F F,_ -.. y4 'i� ""�' �. ,4 *�. t _ ,xr > l 'a a.3 r Y- i di?k1R � s.'t T� d - b ✓ as �Fi a - �� `� '.; - C ry. J : 25 ��° c r fy Rev. 10.31.2012 Transfer to Routes ROUTE Z ■rwwici.bleauririant.cams Vinelar Ave 1=11111.. T.113 � I �Z Cherry Valley Ble Transfer 12 13 7 to Routes 9 11 17 G d al Oak alley Pkwy a c Past Mike 0 Beaumont Civic center and Police S1tai►on Scan Cade treiaw for all route irifarmatron Rev. 10.31.2012 Koh& Legend I flap rot to scale • Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Alternate Routing N later Bros./ 4Less Wal-Mart 1st tre C to Z eaffrie 6144' AfraWleV at - &vie alai ettiew de array el getrizazezi6 6M &weal 2.ife.t Simmer ea/Jew Serice e -Ady iffie: MI .:4-. .5pArt, a Sire-,Atizit "aid ttel ,f0F. 4---ateraeVe la maul. n'; . ���� r , 1 , r .? rAwl/ma ot.��Art..r�4 d lot t it 0r _rae. �,err� f.-itt awn cha •�r� aird . caave• azt'' rwr _- ��l - -;� t y afir 40411400,41411 Fr! hi II�Ar�' ?Y .y Rti w #1 F ti. II I 4404 �.7 a SOW 10152 44%11,3 14 WNW %MIX E. . ��� WA .". Cel a 17 ail IS iiii E aft 0 4I * iD ii: f �g - CO CFO I s _ 0 i i0 i F fasamoD) tmv Loam 44s o 4 ' ua r. teary cv co La cat on Nags linen suiLifi maga AIL uper7. ce) go , 7 La , 7 co ! l•-• I T 03 7*+ Cr) (u NW 961W40 CA 0 44:g 0 0 0 GI siii iiri quilt Rigs* 01�CO ociocia 441 CiCiC400 eti 116 14: I:6 0 ar; Commuter Link II 20 rrww.ci.beauICf'Nan sca.us Legend I map net to scale • Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Anderson Ave Loma Linda VA Hospital 11,1 Myrdewood Drive Calimesa 41, Carrs.7r. Calimesa Stater Bros, Beaumont 45 Wal-Mart Highland Springs Ave '0 San Bernardino w Metrolink Station R v' 4100 RITE 1110 OFFERS WEEHDAY SERVICE ONLY FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL 51 79-858 I 2 0 Westbound' San Bernardino Metrolink .. , . Genera. Fare each way A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD 1 Times are approximate Beaumont Wal-Mart Callmesa Blued. Stater Bros. San Bernardino Metrolink Station Loma Linda Veteran's Hospital r' MI P M '+:411'.; ..: - l''.. i 0 6:00 —.— 6:45 .— 7:15 7:30 8:00 8:20 8:50 9:05 9:30 9:50 12:1.0 12 25 1:00 1 20 4 Qa 4:15 4:45 5:05 :..5:35 5.50 6:20 . ... -r• 1 0 Eastbound' Beaumont Waillart Z3600 aeneral Fare each way A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD 1 Times are approximate San Bernardino Metrolink Station Loma Linda Veteran's Hospital Calimesa Blvd. ID Carl's Jr. Beaumont Wal-Mart A M P M ti. iii CO ;� 6:45 -.— —.— 7:15 8:00 8:20 8:35 8:50 9:30 9:50 10:05 10:20 1:00 1:�0 1435 1:50 . 4:45 5:05 5:20 . 536 6:20 ..-,�.:.� 5:50 7:05 CONIMPIPER URN FARES Fare categories Base Fare , General $3.00 Youth (grades K '12) $2.00 Senior (6s+)— $2.00 Disabled** $490, Military Veteran** $2.00 Active Duty Military' FREE **If you plan to use a discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Child (46" tall or under) $2.00 RCTC Rail Short Range Transit Plan FY 2013/14-2015/16 DRAFT JUNE 12, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1 1.1 Description of Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 1 1.3 Fixed Route Services 2 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure 2 Ticket Types 3 Fare Increase 4 1.5 Revenue Fleet 4 1.6 Existing and Planned Facilities 4 Commuter Rail Station Management 4 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 6 2.1 Fixed Route Service 6 Riverside Line 6 Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line 7 91 Line 8 2.2 Key Performance Indicators 9 Riverside Line Error! Bookmark not defined. IEOC Line 9 91 Line Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3 Trip Generators and Projected Growth 9 2.4 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 11 Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) 11 Station Improvements and 11 Construction of New Facilities 11 RCTC Station Maintenance 12 Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project 12 CHAPTER 3 — SERVICE CHANGES AND REGIONAL PLANNING 14 3.1 Recent Service Changes 14 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications 14 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion 15 3.4 Coachella Valley Rail Service 15 3.5 LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency 16 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 18 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 18 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program 18 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 18 Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI 18 TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD 19 Alternative Fueled Vehicles 19 TABLE 1 — FLEET INVENTORY 20 TABLE 2 — SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY 21 TABLE 3 - SRTP ROUTE STATISTICS 22 TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED 23 TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF FUTURE FUNDS REQUESTED 25 TABLE 6 - STATE TRIENNIAL AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS 28 TABLE 7 - PERFORMANCE TARGET REPORT 29 TABLE 8 - SRTP PERFORMANCE REPORT 30 TABLE 9 - SRTP HIGHLIGHTS 31 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS BNSF Burlington Northern -Santa Fe Railroad CETAP Community & Environmental Acceptability Process CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Funds CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments EOM Extra -Ordinary Maintenance FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration IEOC Inland Empire -Orange County Line LACMTA Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority LAUS Los Angeles Union Station LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency LTF Local Transportation Funds MOW Maintenance -of -Way NTD National Transit Database OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PTC Positive Train Control PVL Perris Valley Line RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program SANBAG San Bernardino Associated Governments SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SJBL San Jacinto Branch Line SR State Route SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance Funds STIP State Transportation Improvement Program STP Surface Transportation Program Funds TVM Ticket Vending Machine UP Union Pacific Railroad VCTC Ventura County Transportation Commission r `` Riverside (eerily Tronsporrmion Commission CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area Currently, five of the 57 Metrolink stations are located in Western Riverside County. These five stations, Riverside -Downtown, Pedley, La Sierra, West Corona, and North Main Corona, are owned and maintained by RCTC. A �I g litAP NOT TO SiALI 0}� r �q�.,l�' a ������p k' 8 8 8 8 8 ° / 1/44", 0,0 /oe / ,20 n.erroli nkvain..om METRDLINK METROINK ROUTES R PmdopeYdlq line 4 Rol Tramfor Swim R Inlmd EmpinLFnngo County Line ueminlvh.mnak Oronge County line Shared Snean R Rircruide line prnmuk P.& k.Aimr R San Bernardino lino vomvna Coomy Lne C655PMoto RailN.o.Bun R 911.65 IRi.«ride-FolertonUl 9f eiw F.6nvr 15.2010 ,1•1[114 I It 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections Whether traveling to work, school, or one of Southern California's great recreational destinations, Metrolink trains provide a viable alternative to driving alone. Every day, thousands of Southern California residents park their cars and choose Metrolink to commute. The average Metrolink commute from Riverside County is 37 miles. Metrolink trains are also popular with schools throughout the region both transporting students to classes and for field trips. The Metrolink rider profiles are updated every two years. The following is the latest socio-economic data collected in 2012: 1 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission Line Gender: Male Female Riverside Line 46% 54% IEOC Line 50% 50% 91 Line 50% 50% System -wide 50% 50% Ethnicity: Black 19% 12% 19% 17% Hispanic 31 % 23% 25% 27% Asian 19% 6% 18% 13% Native Hawaiian 2% 1 % 2% 2% American Indian 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Caucasian (non -Hispanic) 25% 52% 29% 36% Other 4% 4% 6% 5% Median Income (2010) $84,274 $77,459 $80,357 $76,647 Full -Time Employed 85% 86% 86% 80% Automobile Available 92% 87% 83% 83% 1.3 Fixed Route Services Metrolink regularly operates Monday through Friday. Weekend service operates on a reduced frequency on the IEOC, Orange County and San Bernardino Lines on Saturdays and Sundays with extensions to the Riverside -Downtown Station. IEOC Line Weekend service began July 2006. There is limited service on New Year's Day on the San Bernardino and Antelope Valley Lines. Trains do not normally operate on the following major holidays: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure Metrolink ticket prices are distance -based and calculated on the shortest driving miles between stations. Each station combination is uniquely priced, based on driving miles from one station to the other. A ride from Downtown Riverside to Los Angeles Union Station is a 59 mile one-way trip; a ride from Downtown Riverside to Irvine is a 40 mile trip. The distance charge is currently capped at 80 miles. This pricing program offers a fair and equitable pricing policy. Over time, Metrolink customers traveling the same distances will pay the same price, and short trips will cost less than longer trips. The Metrolink ticket price consists of three elements: a base boarding charge, an additional increment related to the number of miles traveled, and finally a modest increment to permit Metrolink passengers to transfer without requiring an additional fare on selected connecting transit operators and a reduced rate on others. 2 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r INEmi Rircrside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Ticket Types There are five types of regular Metrolink tickets. Several ticket types have been discontinued in an effort to simplify operations and reduce costs. The Personal Care Attendant (PCA) free ride policy will be AI amended to require a $25 per year attendant identification card. One Way Tickets One-way tickets are valid for one trip only, defined as continuous travel away from the origin station to the destination station specified on the ticket. One-way trips must be completed within three hours after purchase of ticket on the day of purchase. The expiration time and date is displayed on the ticket. Types of One-way Tickets sold: Weekday, Youth, Senior/Disabled, Student, and Military. Youth: Child: Student: Senior: Disabled: Military: Discounts Ages 6 to 18 Weekdays -regular fare; Weekends, 25% off one way and round trip tickets Three children, age 5 or under, rides free with an adult using a valid ticket 10% discount on all ticket types with proper ID Age 65 and over with valid photo ID with date of birth; 50% off regular adult fare on one way and round trip tickets, 25% off monthly and 7-day passes With proper ID, 50% off regular adult fare on one way and round trip tickets, 25% off monthly and 7-day passes 10% discount on all fares with valid ID 1 J Round Trip Tickets Round trip tickets are valid for two trips only, from and to the origin station and the destination station marked on the ticket. The first leg of a round trip ticket is valid for three hours from purchase. The return ticket is valid for travel anytime on the same day as the first leg of the trip. Types of round trip tickets sold: Weekday, Adult Weekend, Youth Weekend, Senior/Disabled, and Military. 7-Day Pass Valid for unlimited travel during a seven-day period between station pairs starting on the day when the pass is purchased. Monthly Pass Monthly Passes are valid for unlimited travel between the origin station and destination station printed on the pass during the calendar month. Types of monthly passes: Adult, Senior/Disabled, and Student (sold only to participating schools through Metrolink's administrative office). $10 Weekend Day Pass Metrolink introduces the Weekend Pass for only $10 per person. This pass is good for unlimited systemwide travel on Saturday or Sunday only. The Weekend Day Pass is accepted for free transfers to connecting transit services, except Amtrak. 3 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Niarside (ouniy iionspornorion Commission Fare Increase Since Metrolink began operations in 1992, fares have increased as indicated in the following chart: 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 5% 0% 4% 4.5% 5.5% 3.5% 5.5% 3% 6% 0% 7% 5% Historically, these fare increases have been across-the-board with all ticket types incurring the same price increase. For FY 2013/14 fares will increase 5% subject to hearing on June 28, 2013. In addition to adjusting fares in 2004 to keep pace with inflation, member agencies, including RCTC, also sought a rationalization of the fares charged for travel between the existing Metrolink zones. Over the years, unusual anomalies evolved where stations were placed into zones not necessarily based upon mileage issues but on other local issues. Zone fares were eliminated in July 2005 and replaced by a new fare structure that results in passengers being charged based upon the highway driving mileage between stations. Implementation of this structure was spread over 10 years to minimize financial impacts on individual riders whose particular trip may have been artificially kept low. 1.5 Revenue Fleet The Metrolink fleet is composed of 52 in-service locomotives and 205 commuter rail cars. Twenty new cars are being delivered with incremental integration into the fleet throughout 2013. 1.6 Existing and Planned Facilities In planning for a successful commuter rail program in Western Riverside County, RCTC acquired properties for current and future passenger rail service. Commuter Rail Station Management Unlike the other SCRRA county agencies, the Commission owns and operates six rail stations serving Riverside County: • Riverside -Downtown • Pedley • Riverside -La Sierra • North Main Corona • West Corona; and • Perris Multimodal Facility (joint RTA/RCTC facility) 4 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside Coenly Tronsporlmion Commission Station operation and maintenance costs are included in the rail program budget with services coordinated by the Commission's staff. Parking is currently free at the stations. The station operating and maintenance FY 2013/14 budget totals $1,728,300 funded by Western Riverside County Rail Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Measure A and vending machine revenues. The average budget including administration and management overhead is $288,050 per station. San Jacinto Branch Line E ACIOMO COUNTY A 411E MIT y� AIYEASIUE PEMPTIMI «xxxMxHw SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE MEM VALLEY BEAUMONT The Measure A program provides for Riverside County's participation in the creation of a regional commuter rail system. Though the primary goal was to provide service from Riverside to Los Angeles and Orange counties, the Measure A map included a possible internal element along the former Santa Fe Railroad's San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL). The SJBL corridor extends 38.3 miles between Highgrove and Hemet within Riverside County. The alignment roughly follows the Interstate 215 to Perris where it veers east, parallel to State Route 74 to Hemet and San Jacinto. As part of the regional acquisition of Burlington Northern -Santa Fe (BNSF) properties and use rights, RCTC purchased the 38-mile SJBL and adjacent properties in 1993 for $26 million using Western County Rail Measure A and state rail bonds (Prop 108 of 1990). BNSF retained exclusive freight operating rights, serving its customers along the line and maintaining the right-of-way until such time as passenger service is implemented. Planning continues on the Initial Operating Segment (IOS) of the SJBL for the Perris Valley Line. This Line would provide a connection from Moreno Valley's March Air Reserve Base and Perris to mainline rail services in downtown Riverside (see Section 2.5 for more details). 5 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service The SCRRA operates seven commuter rail lines. Three routes, the Riverside, Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC), and 91 Lines, directly serve Western Riverside County, with connecting service available to destinations on the other four lines. Riverside Line This line extends 59.1 miles between the city of Riverside and the Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) along the Union Pacific (UP) Railroad alignment. The route roughly follows the Pomona Freeway corridor (SR60) through the cities and communities of Pedley, Mira Loma, Ontario, Pomona, Walnut, Industry, La Puente, Montebello, and Commerce. Existing stations include Riverside -Downtown, Pedley, East Ontario, Downtown -Pomona, Industry, Montebello/Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, SANBAG, and the LACMTA jointly fund the line. Currently, five peak -period round -trips and one off-peak round-trip operate Monday through Friday. Daily peak - period AM boardings have averaged 2,501 during March 2013. Approximately 29.6% of the morning boardings occur at Riverside County's two stations on this line, Riverside -Downtown and Pedley.1 The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) fixed routes and Amtrak provide connecting transit service in Riverside County. The scheduled peak -direction trip time between downtown Riverside and LAUS varies between 83 and 88 minutes, including dwell time at intermediate stations. Riverside Line Line Opening: June 1993 Route miles: 59.1 Avg Trip Length (miles): 39.3 Trains Operated/Day: 12 Avg FY12/13 Weekday Ridership: 4,989 FY13/14 Budget Operating Subsidy/Passenger Mile: Farebox Recovery: Revenue Recovery (MOW/ROW): $0.15 57.1 % 58.6% Current Stations Served Riverside -Downtown 4066 Vine Street Pedley 6001 Pedley Road East Ontario 3330 E Francis St Downtown -Pomona 101 N Main Street Industry 600 S Brea Canyon Rd Montebello/Commerce 2000 Flotilla St LA Union Station 800 N Alameda St ' Source: AM Peak -Period (Peak Direction) Boardings, March 2013 6 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r IMENI Niarside (ouniy iionspornnrion Commission Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line This line extends 100.1 miles between the city of San Bernardino, in San Bernardino County, and Irvine and San Juan Capistrano, in Orange County, with limited extensions in Oceanside. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeway (SR91) along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) San Bernardino Subdivision in Riverside and Orange County. This commuter rail service to Orange County provides a transportation alternative in one of the busiest corridors in Southern California. The Line is a jointly funded project of the RCTC, SANBAG, and OCTA. When the service began in October 1995, it was the first suburb -to -suburb commuter rail line in the country. One station in San Bernardino County, four stations within Riverside County, eight stations within Orange County, and one station in San Diego County now serve the line. In July 2012 RCTC added one additional peak round-trip for a total of five peak - period round -trips, and three off-peak round -trips operating Monday through Friday. Morning boardings averaged 2,246 during March 2013. Approximately 88.7% of the morning boardings occurred at Riverside County's four stations on this line, at Riverside -Downtown, Riverside - La Sierra, North Main Corona, and West Corona.2 IEOC weekend service began on July 15, 2006. This route was modeled after the successful RCTC-chartered Beach Trains. The service has been reduced to one round trip leaving from San Bernardino to Oceanside in the morning and returning in the afternoon on Saturday and Sunday. The trains make all IEOC stops, plus the San Clemente Pier. The current running time between downtown Riverside and Irvine is approximately 68 minutes. RTA, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting transit service. IEOC Line Line Opening: October 1995 Route miles: 100.1 Avg Trip Length (miles): 33.8 Trains Operated/Day: 14 Avg FY12/13 Weekday Ridership: 4,429 FY13/14 Budget: Operating Subsidy/Passenger Mile: Farebox Recovery: Revenue Recovery (MOW/ROW): Current Stations Served: San Bernardino Riverside -Downtown Riverside -La Sierra North Main Corona West Corona Anaheim Canyon Orange Santa Ana Tustin Irvine Laguna Niguel San Juan Capistrano San Clemente San Clemente Pier" Oceanside *Weekends only $0.36 34.5% 36.5% 1204 West 3rd St 4066 Vine Street 10901 Indiana Ave 250 E Blaine St 155 S Auto Center Dr 1039 N Pacificenter Dr 194 N Atchison St 1000 E Santa Ana BI 2975 Edinger Ave 15215 Barranca Pkwy 28200 Forbes Rd 26701 Verdugo St 1850 Avenida Estacion Avenida del Mar 235 S Tremont Ave 2 Source: AM Peak -Period (Peak Direction) Boardings, March 2013 7 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission 91 Line This route officially began operating peak -period service on May 6, 2002. The route extends 61.6 miles between Riverside and Downtown Los Angeles. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeway (SR91) along the BNSF San Bernardino subdivision through Riverside County to Fullerton in Orange County where it continues northwest to downtown Los Angeles. Existing stations that serve this line include Riverside -Downtown, Riverside -La Sierra, North Main Corona, West Corona, Fullerton, Buena Park, Norwalk, Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, OCTA, and the LACMTA jointly fund the Line. The service levels on this route are still developing. Currently, there are two AM peak -period trips from Riverside to Los Angeles with two PM peak period returns. There are two AM peak period trips from Los Angeles to Riverside with one PM peak period return and one mid day off-peak round-trip. This service operates Monday through Friday. Morning boardings averaged 1,182 during March 2013. Approximately 68.9% of the morning boardings occur at Riverside County's four stations on this line, at Riverside -Downtown, Riverside - La Sierra, North Main Corona, and West Corona.3 The peak -period running time between downtown Riverside and Los Angeles is approximately 90 minutes. RTA, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting service in Riverside County. 91 Line Line Opening: May 2002 Route miles: 61.6 Avg Trip Length (miles): 36.6 Trains Operated/Day: 9 Avg FY12/13 Weekday Ridership: 2,448 FY13/14 Budget: Operating Subsidy/Passenger Mile: Farebox Recovery: Revenue Recovery (MOW/ROW): Current Stations Served: Riverside -Downtown Riverside -La Sierra North Main Corona West Corona Fullerton Buena Park Norwalk Commerce LA Union Station $0.25 44.3% 45.2% 4066 Vine St 10901 Indiana Ave 250 E Blaine St 155 S Auto Center Dr 120 E Santa Fe Ave Lakeknoll Dr & Dale St 12700 Imperial Highway 6433 26th St 800 N Alameda St Source: AM Peak -Period (Peak Direction) Boardings, March 2013 8 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironsporinion Commission 2.2 Key Performance Indicators RCTC will use the following performance indicators provided by SCRRA to measure the effectiveness of the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 Lines: 91 Line Indicator FY11/12 Audited FY12/13 Projected FY13/14 Plan Unlinked Passenger Trips 586,410 633,511 643,245 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.19 $0.23 $0.25 Farebox Recovery Ratio 52.4% 47.5% 44.3% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.40 $0.45 $0.45 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $6.90 $8.54 $9.10 Operating Expense/Train Mile $61.49 $73.12 $72.53 Revenue Recovery 53.4% 48.5% 45.2% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 4 car set) 37.83 36.46 40.35 1EOC Line Indicator FY11/12 Audited FY12/13 Projected FY13/14 Plan Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,037,633 1,139,347 1,207,326 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.41 $0.35 $0.36 Farebox Recovery Ratio 29.5% 34.9% 34.5% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.60 $0.56 $0.56 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $13.10 $11.97 $12.04 Operating Expense/Train Mile $74.19 $66.12 $68.45 Revenue Recovery 32.1 % 37.2% 36.5% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 4 car set) 30.78 33.00 34.11 Riverside Line Indicator FY11/12 Audited FY12/13 Projected FY13/14 Plan Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,319,157 1,402,218 1,292,761 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.12 $0.12 $0.15 Farebox Recovery Ratio 58.5% 59.2% 57.1 % Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.30 $0.32 $0.36 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $4.56 $4.85 $5.81 Operating Expense/Train Mile $81.92 $95.53 $97.31 Revenue Recovery 60.6% 60.9% 58.6% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 5 car set) 66.97 72.36 75.67 2.3 Trip Generators and Projected Growth Feeder services to stations are vital to the success of commuter rail in Western Riverside County. Coordination and consultation with transit providers and local 9 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Niarside (ouniy iionspornorion Commission agencies is an ongoing process. Connecting transit to stations in Western Riverside County is provided by RTA, Sunline, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser. RTA, RCTC, and Metrolink continue to work together to increase awareness of the RTA bus connections at the RCTC Metrolink stations. Ads regularly appear in the RTA Ride Guide promoting free RTA transfers from Metrolink stations. The Ride Guide includes the five Metrolink stations in its Route Directory Listing. Additionally, Metrolink occasionally helps promote the RTA CommuterLink service in materials at the stations. In addition to its fixed routes, RTA developed CommuterLink to address commuter needs. This express service provides transit to and from Riverside Metrolink stations and transit centers during peak commuting periods. The program aims to provide a viable transit alternative for commuters, helping mitigate congestion and pollution. The Corona Cruiser, operated by the City of Corona, provides a fixed route schedule but offers some route deviation with advance reservation. Buses run Monday through Saturday and serves the North Main Corona Station as well as stops throughout Corona. Beginning Fall 2013, Sunline began operating commuter express service connecting residents of the Coachella Valley with the Pass Area and Western Riverside County. The service addresses the transit service gap between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County, providing alternative transportation options to commuting residents of Coachella Valley. For over 10 years, RCTC has actively supported transit connections by establishing agreements with SCRRA and the Riverside County transit providers to provide free transfers for all connecting transit services at Riverside County stations. With the agreement, Metrolink ticket holders can ride both fixed route and Dial -A -Ride services for free as they travel to and from a station in Riverside County. RCTC subsidizes half the fare while Metrolink subsidizes the other half. Feeder buses and transit services are also critically important at the destination end. For the IEOC route, dedicated OCTA shuttle buses meet all peak -period trains at Anaheim Canyon, Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin, and Irvine. Some OCTA buses meet trains at all these stations as well as Laguna Niguel, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente. 10 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r INEmi Rircrside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission 2.4 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs Commuters boarding at RCTC Metrolink stations are provided with amenities that assist with their daily travel needs. Vending machines stocked with beverages and snacks are available at each station. Station facilities also include wireless internet access, bike lockers, designated parking for motorcycles and carpools. Furthermore, all stations are staffed 24 hours by contracted security guards, closed circuit television, and various safety and security enhancements such as fencing and gates. Amenities are also available onboard the train. All train cars are equipped with restrooms, and some of the newer cars contain hook-ups for laptop computers. Additionally designated bike cars and quiet cars have been added throughout the system. Metrolink has developed the website www.metrolinktrains.com. This site provides passengers with enhanced features allowing for greater content functionality. Improvements include regular service updates on the homepage, improved content management functions, enhanced usability and a more consistent look and feel with features expected by our increasingly web savvy passengers. Additionally, passengers can now subscribe through Twitter to obtain service updates and plan their trips using Google Transit. Major needs, which continue to be the focus of RCTC attention for the SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16, include the following: • Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC); and • Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project. Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) PTC has been a major technical undertaking and initial operating elements should be implemented by the end of 2013. PTC will continue to be a priority for Metrolink and RCTC to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The $210 million capital project has been jointly funded by the member agencies and will be implemented prior to the federal deadline of 2015. Station Improvements and Construction of New Facilities In order to meet the capacity needs of current and future system growth and expansion, the following facilities will be completed or commenced in the upcoming fiscal year: • Construction of a covered passenger waiting and concession area at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station; and 11 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission • New Operations Control Center at Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station to expand and enhance existing security and station surveillance operations. RCTC Station Maintenance The Commission fully funds and maintains all of the commuter rail stations in Riverside County, which is unique among the Metrolink member agencies. Since Metrolink service began along the Riverside Line in 1993, the Commission has been maintaining the Riverside Downtown and Pedley stations. When the Inland Empire -Orange County Line began in 1995, the La Sierra and West Corona stations were added. Due to increasing demand, the North Main Corona station was added in 2002. Over the years, the stations show their age and require preventative maintenance. The Commission has always taken pride in the commuter rail stations and intends to invest $2 million to preserve the Commission's assets. Anticipated improvements include: • Comprehensive painting of station structures • Resealing of station parking lots • Improved access for disabled patrons • Drought tolerant landscaping upgrades Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project From 1999 to 2000, funding commitments to the SJBL were sporadic. RCTC successfully implemented the SJBL in the Federal Transportation Efficiency Act for the Twenty -First Century (TEA-21), making it an eligible FTA New Start rail project. In 1998, Congress appropriated $500,000 to the SJBL. These funds have since been drawn down to conduct an Alternatives Analysis, "The San Jacinto Branch Line/1-215 Corridor Study." Through prior action, the Commission has allocated $20 million for the implementation of passenger rail service between Riverside and Perris on the SJBL. In June 2003, the Commission re -adopted the Locally Preferred Alternative as an IOS, the Perris Valley Line (Riverside - Moreno Valley -Perris) Metrolink extension of the 91 Line. This extension consists of four peak -period round trips supplemented by a midday round trip. All trains will operate from Perris to Los Angeles via Riverside. The estimated cost to implement the new service is $248 million, for a start up of service by late 2015. Staff has identified the additional federal, state, and local sources needed to fund this project. RCTC has received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), RCTC has completed project development and final design. RCTC is currently seeking approval of the Small Start Grant Agreement (SSGA) from FTA to provide up to $75 million for the project. The entire federal amount has been set aside for RCTC in the Federal Budget. RCTC has identified sufficient local funds for its share of the project. 12 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (cozily ironspor mion Conn ion The Commission has received the following grant funds to date in support of the project: Received Measure A CMAQ 64,031,738 2,907,000 FTA 5307 16,157,453 FTA 5309 1,960,000 STP 500,000 FTA 5307 10,000,000 CMAQ 4,298,000 Pending CMAQ 36,514,263 FTA 5309 74,999,999 TOTAL 211,368,453 13 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission CHAPTER 3 — SERVICE CHANGES AND REGIONAL PLANNING 3.1 Recent Service Changes On July 2, 2012, Metrolink expanded its Inland Empire Orange County weekday service, adding one additional daily peak roundtrip. 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications The RCTC rail program consists of planning, programming, advocacy and implementation elements. This SRTP incorporates a variety of activities which support these elements. The FY 2013/14 Capital and Operating Plan reflects the efficiencies implemented since Metrolink's inception. Proposed service maximizes the use of existing rolling stock to relieve overcrowding. The FY 2013/14 proposed budget is under review by all of the member agencies and concurrence is anticipated by June 2013. Riverside Line Service Level Changes No change. 1E0C Line Service Level Changes No change. 91 Line Service Level Changes Two additional peak period round trips are proposed. OPERATING SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS FOR FY2013/14 Line/Route Weekday Trains Saturday Trains Sunday Trains Riverside 12 Riverside -LA (UP) 4 Riverside -LA* 4 Riverside -LA* IEOC 3 San Bernardino - Irvine 2 San Bernardino - Laguna Niguel 2 San Bernardino - San Juan Capistrano 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 1 Riverside - Irvine 3 Riverside - Laguna Niguel 2 Riverside - Oceanside 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 91/Riv-Ful-LA 9 Riverside -LA (BNSF) *Trains run via the San Bernardino Line The Commission's goal in participating in a regional commuter rail system is to provide useful transportation alternatives to its residents. To a large degree, this goal has already been achieved. Each morning, over 3,000 Riverside residents board one of 12 Metrolink trains headed for jobs in Orange and Los Angeles counties. These rail commuters also contribute to a reduction in freeway traffic, removing more than 1.5 lanes of peak hour traffic each morning and each afternoon. 14 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission Notwithstanding this success, a commuter rail service is unlike most of the projects funded by the Commission. The complete benefits of the project are not fully realized upon completion of construction or initial implementation of service. The commuter rail service must increase frequency as the demand increases over time. This increase in service is constrained by the availability of rail vehicles, capacity on the railroad, and available funding. Currently, not all of the Riverside County routes operate at optimal service levels. Two of the three Metrolink lines do not even offer minimum basic coverage during peak travel times. The IEOC and the 91 Line do not yet provide half- hourly headways and thus, their attractiveness to residents and ultimately their ridership and revenue performance are compromised. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion Metrolink will continue outreach to new residents through direct -mail campaigns to homeowners within the system's sphere of service in Riverside County. Additionally, Metrolink is developing a targeted marketing strategy with all its member agencies. RCTC has budgeted for targeted promotion of service during the summer months. 3.4 Coachella Valley Rail Service The concept of developing an expanded passenger rail service from Los Angeles to Indio and the Coachella Valley has been discussed for many years. The plan includes new daily round trip Amtrak trains to the Coachella Valley provided through the Amtrak/Caltrans state partnership. RCTC in conjunction with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), Caltrans Division of Rail and the Federal Railroad Administration will begin the first phase of detailed corridor planning with the initiation of the Service Development Plan (SDP). This SDP will be the first major study that will carefully design a viable service plan with appropriate ridership and service modeling plans. The effort along with completion of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the corridor will allow it to compete for future federal funding. RCTC worked closely with Caltrans to initiate the Alternatives Analysis that has been completed and shows promising ridership potential for the new route. RCTC plans on taking the lead on the Service Development Plan study and intends to use Prop 1 B funds to help support the project. In addition, there is local support for this effort from the CVAG Executive Committee who recently directed staff to establish a 90% bus transit/10% passenger rail service funding allocation split for Coachella Valley TDA funds to be phased in over a 3-4 year period. In addition, a MOU will be established between RCTC and CVAG to develop a Coachella Valley Rail Fund that will use both the TDA funds and additional state and local funds to conduct station development studies and provide initial capital funding for station development. It has been determined through numerous studies over the years that the Amtrak intercity option is preferred over a Metrolink commuter option, because of the long trip length and added comfort and amenities on the Amtrak trains and also Amtrak's contractual rights to operate over freight railroads. 15 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 MEM NM= 1 Riarsitle foliar Tionsp oricn fo nmissien LOS ANGELES COUNTY STATION FULLERTON x vuccr LINDA STA • ON ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED LOS ANGELES TO INDIO INTERCITY RAIL SERVICE SAN BERNARDINO Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Tracks COUNTY Union Pacific Railroad Tracks Existing Station with Rail Connections 0 G Proposed Station sax" REDLANDS/ LOMA LINDA STATION RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN STATION RIVERSIDE COUNTY WEN BANNING/ B£AUMONT aemluc STATION ceaem CABAZON 9TATIDN LW. PALM SAAINOS rarroH RANCFIOCALIMENIRAGTEE/ AGUd srnrroH ran ,0111111. INDIO DOWNTOWN srarroN 3.5 LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is a joint powers authority (JPA) created to oversee the intercity passenger rail service in the travel corridor between San Diego and Los Angeles. This agency has evolved as rail service has been extended to Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo Counties and now includes all counties along the Pacific Surfliner Corridor from San Diego to San Luis Obispo County. The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is tasked with the following functions: • Plan, recommend programs, promote, and identify funding sources for improvements to passenger rail services and facilities in the LOSSAN corridor; • Negotiate for and accept funds to be expended for the purpose of providing and improving intercity and commuter passenger rail services and activities; • Review and comment on facility, service, and operational plans and programs of the agency or agencies operating sub -corridor commuter rail service in the LOSSAN corridor; • Coordinate facility, service, and operational plans and programs with other organizations providing passenger rail service in the Southern California region; and 16 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r INEmi Rircrside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission • Advocate improvements to services and facilities for the corridor before local, regional, state, and federal officials and agencies. The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency does not pay for the operation of any of the passenger rail services within the corridor, but it is a means to help coordinate operations and planning. RCTC has been an active ex-officio member since 2011 and with the recently revised Joint Powers Authority MOU; RCTC is now a full voting member. The passage of Senate Bill 1225 signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September 2012 sets the stage for local control. This bill established a process for transferring the administrative responsibilities for the state -supported intercity passenger rail service along the corridor from Caltrans to a locally governed joint powers authority. This local authority would have more control over schedules, operations, fares, marketing, and coordination with other transit operators. Currently, LOSSAN is in this transfer period and is looking to select a managing agency in Southern California to take the lead and coordinate the Interagency Transfer Agreement with Caltrans. These efforts require financial support that is prohibited from coming from Caltrans. RCTC, along with the other member agencies, will be contributing to the start up operations and will be actively engaged in the development of rail service in Southern California. 17 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget This SRTP reflects the Commission's commitment to the commuter rail goals in the FY 2013/14 RCTC Budget: • Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving Riverside County; • Extend commuter rail service to Moreno Valley and Perris via the San Jacinto Branch Line; and • Maximize opportunities for public use of rail -related investments. Specific highlights of the FY 2013/14 Budget include: • Begin Construction of the Perris Valley Line (Riverside - Moreno Valley - Perris) Metrolink extension project; • Implement Positive Train Control in the Metrolink network; • An increase in operating subsidy due to PTC costs. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program With the passage of Measure A in 1988, $100 million was identified and committed to the development and implementation of a commuter rail system to serve Riverside County residents. The Rail Department uses LTF for operation as well as federal 5307, 5309, 5337 and state Proposition 1 B funds for capital. RCTC holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven member Board. RCTC staff members serve on the five -county Technical Advisory Committee which negotiates service and funding levels based upon the counties' established priorities. Staff also provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and RCTC departments, and linkages to local communities. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Public participation regarding service levels is largely garnered through the bi-annual on -board survey. Public hearings are held prior to any service changes. Daily receipt of feedback from the public is sought through Metrolink's 1-800-371-LINK (5465) and website www.metrolinktrains.com. Additionally, RCTC maintains a customer service number (951) 778-1092, provides service updates through Twitter and receives comments through the www.rctc.org website. Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI SCRRA is responsible for the regulatory and compliance requirements governing the use of federal and state funds in accordance with ADA and Title VI. Accordingly, RCTC 18 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission is responsible for additional compliance requirements as it relates to station facilities. All Metrolink trains and stations are accessible to persons with disabilities. TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD The RCTC TDA Triennial Audit was completed in September, 2010. The last audit resulted in no findings as pertained to the Rail Program. The FTA Triennial Audit completed in August 2013 resulted in no findings for RCTC. NTD is reported annually by both SCRRA and RCTC. Alternative Fueled Vehicles Metrolink operates low emission diesel locomotives. These state of the art high - efficiency and low -emission locomotives greatly enhance the existing fleet. 19 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 TABLE 1 - FLEET INVENTORY ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑C 664'L99'44 0 .99 ZO£ 8:9 uncWb . apo0 1a21:eAu6r1 Jeq;O a9uoacc Pa103 t•L6'cOL £49'999'L 01Z ZEL 9A 0 09 09 913A3119 22Z OLOZ VdJN'4 Vd00'9 dU'20 san'2 09 99944 wainti . apo0 10Jn:LV10,41 Jaggy aquocaC 100109 475'LOL 599'L937 017 17L 59 0 45 t 919A9119 2Z2 OLn7 VdiN 4 55d00.g da En Sen 7 45 Z91444 W11188 0 0 0 LEL S9 0 0 0 I00-,-10 LSd Ea; vn VdlL L dd ZO san Z S. L6L5£ Pules 984'002 L£9'L99 0 0 89 i❑ 4O 0 0 EL 9Zd111 IcYY 6009 VdiN 4 Vdoo 9 It -lc saA is Z. 58L5£ ioal0598L'OOZ 4Z8'LO. O 0 89 AO 'PO 0 0 L SCAN Ign 900Z VddN'4 Vd00'9 -1 'LC "A2 Z NESE peps £0E'D4a 009'SZ9 01Z DEL 9A 0 61 LL 912A2119 Y109 0 8551 VdiN'4 VdOO'S d8I 20 sBn'L L. 199L1 Pola588L'Z90': 9.5'90 OLZ 641. 99 0 Z Z 91EA2119 1^4O9 4061 VddN'4 Vd00'9 c1H20 Sen'Z Z NOLL P0109 90E'L94 1.8'09 0 0 89 JO'PO 0 0 Otd Oho 9951 VddN'4 Vd00'2 it 'IC Lon'L L D549 P0103 401.'899 Z49'E02 0 0 85 dCl.'40 0 0 4 I1-469d Oho 0 LODZ _0 Z *100'9 1'1C 85J1'E 4 46L9 L'0103996'959 9ED'£4L'1 01Z 04L 90 0 92 9Z 91203113 INO3 0 LOOZ _02 Vd00'9 LK:I20 LBA2 9Z MD P0105 464'506 602'EL0 01Z DEL 00 0 ZL LI, 912A3119 NO9 0 L651 Vdi41'4 VdOO'0 d2J 20 s0.1.2 2: 26L9 112128101n41% 1.1Z'494'1. 01Z 541. S9 0 O£ OE 912A2119 INO9 0 COOL Vd841'4 Vd00'9 dU20 'RA2 OE L9L9 100109 Z004LOZ'L L0VL194Z 01Z 541- 9A 0 89 95 912A2119 NOS 0 2661 VddN'4 Vd00'9 dU 20 MA .Z 09 DBL9 P0109 DOg'DL8 129'40L 0 0 95 i0'40 0 0 Z 11-d658 011g9 0 9661 tlddN 4 VdOO'S M'1C EN,'2 L 68.19 Loala9 1.05'0!9 179n04 0 0 95 AO'40 0 0 9 11-d65i OLtiO 0 568L VdiN'4 VdOO'S TELL 99A2 8 99L9 Pa1a9 55E:.25 £94'SO£ 0 0 85 AO 4C1 n n 9 kd9S3 OINE1 £0311 VdiN 4 Y1dOO .g It -1C 'Mk E 9 LOL9 P111a5 1)69',ZU'4 1:19SVIA1 0 0 a9 AD 411 0 0 91. PdViA :1h0 Z6t<1 VddN 4 Vd00 S 1t "LC sit,. Z y:. NM iasl_ apoLu ap!yaA poua. Raecto Apede0 060,. ap0O sgF!yaA sap!yaA pa!,dL! JaquunAl ap0O alnPikroon aarog 91.:10O *0O PQW. ;S2U 'OI.Ab epNet% JeL/Laue anraV Eu46a010 0uipueq u•_a0g 4 y;Euai edhy lenf l.:ue2ucuoO empseooy aa.alyen, ppm Auipenueyy ,o.eaA Fa an», 6Llpund dquewnO etYiy pecso!pec Lem, uI 8;019O RI pas- Jed saliw sapcaaA apgan koenaLu3 [yOy,I aarpy ,a apI4aA sap NCP, awga;ll anray uo ;c Jaquwnry 0651. uagwnN ,o a6eJ00V ssl!111e101 to l-0V 10,ILLrN sapg117,gC 4:un sucznicav Jo J0q w 1N n c 1 6 d o u w y f _ 4 B 1 • q s :eavvvs aO :epo Ly IOE'Vi L+aLuer.w eplyeA enueney :eLuery LLUOA e:M0 Bu1110,M L;s0Z J.21 gFevdey 4104^4' I1ea Ie0e0eb vwaL.13L0,408 :every 40u11611 L519:01 CLLN RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 O N 94/940Z-b4/E40Z Ad d12jS 11V2d 0102j 4werAt(wrcr lmeptCim lmrtr m Table 2 -- RCTC Commuter Rail -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet FY2010/11 Audited FY2011/12 Audited FY2012/13 Plan FY2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY2013/14 Plan Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $43,22),592 $4E,589,680 148,605,000 136,453,753 $51,702,000 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $14,733,018 $15,786,372 $21,060,000 $15,803,000 $22,978,000 M1Jet Operating Expenses (Subsides) $28,487,574 $25,803,308 $27,545,000 $20,650,753 $28,724,000 Operating Characteristics Ullinked Passerger Trips 2,909,872 3,023,071 3,175,076 2,279,000 3,_43,332 Passenger Mies 1C2,765,342 106,656,434 116,803,590 80,028,400 115,155,893 Total Actual VehicRevenue lcurs (a) 14,207.0 11,253.0 17,822.0 11,527.0 17,178.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Ales (b) 2,674,115.0 2,855,935.0 2,895,315.0 2,492,032.0 2,703,680.E Total Actual Vehicle Miles 2,770,304.0 2,S52,538.0 2,896,315.0 2,569,274.0 2,703,680.0 Performance Characteristics Operaing Cost Der Revenue Hour $3,042.20 13,195.36 $2,727.25 13,162.47 $3,009 78 Farebox Recovery Ratio 34.09 V. 43.40 °A 43.32 V. 43.35 °/ 44 44 % Subsidy per Passenger $9.79 $8.54 $8.68 $9.06 $9 1L Subsidy per passenger Nile $0.28 $0.24 $0.24 $0.26 $0 25 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $2,005.18 41,80111 $1,545.56 $1,791.51 $1,672 V Subsidy per Revenue Mile (6) $10.65 $9.04 $9.51 $3.29 $10 62 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 204.8 212.0 173.2 107.7 183.E Passenger per P,evenue Mile (b) 1.09 1.06 L 10 0.91 1 16 (a) Train Hours for Tail Modes. (6) Car Miles for P.ai Nlodes. 9I'I VE87 Z9'Oa VI' EL9I$ VI'a %17V b SV9I$ ZI'6I$ 8f 600'E$ sleloi . o,y a�uaas 6E' I 16' 0 9V I OSZ S'94" Z'0C" SE' 8:t CZ' I I $ Eb' EI $ Of 605I$ E9' 8I8I$ EZ'bCS I$ SI'0$ CE'0$ SE'0$ ZO'9$ Zb' ZI $ SZ'6$ %II'iS 1,0'1,1$ 84'6I$ 9E'OZS'E$ 969VtE S6'8I$ 6I'CI$ 0Z'SC C'Z$ %all, 09'9I$ 0Z'1,Z$ Z8'4Z8'Z$ Ie Pl .,ladl-7178 Ie P1 70E1-7178 Ie Pl I6-7178 alg., aad 5.1061.1053ed a noH .aad 5.106•05sed a1SJ nuana y aad RpPgng a noH .114 nuanad aa6uassed aad RpFgns aad gns .1061.1055rd ofley aad Rp!sgns R,ano�ay xoga.aeA aa61.105sed BIH, a.nuanay anoil anuanaa .lad I503 aad 1.0 aad Is03 6mleaa do 6upeaa do adRI Rea # Blood saoaeolpui aoueuuollad s��21 IIV b1/Ei0ZAi 9 --Ilea 331nww001 31gd so!ls/lel5 alnot( d1 US - S a19Q1 ,w64m.) 000'1,Z C'8Z$ 000'8i 6'Z Z$ 000'ZO C'I S$ 0089'E OC'Z 0'089'EOZ 0'8 CI'.I 0'8LI'CI E68'SSI'SII ZEE'Ebi'E sleloi as pp oad aouaas 000'1,8 f.f$ 000'I669,a 000'646'S$ 000'CE E'0I$ 000'SE 8'C$ 000'9E C'b$ 000'I6I'8I$ 000'9C 000'SC 9'0a Cr S 6C'I E6 O'bbf0 EE'I 011,11f b O'S6C'IE6 O'bbf0 En 0'I bi'Ibh O'9SI'S O'Ebn O'6CC'E O'9EI'S 0'an O'6LC'E L06'608'06 6" 9'C 08' 0b C9 C'ZbS'EZ I9C'ZEZ'1 9Z E'C OZ'1 StE'E49 le Pl ordcl-J178 le Pl 70EQ-J178 le P1 I6-J178 RpP qng IaN anay lso3 sal W sal W .1061.105sed 6ugeaadp leloi anuanay sanoil sanoil leloi anuanay aa61.105sed saa 6uassed sap�ya� steal .14 Rea #alloy quawa 13 ele a sainoa IIV bl/ETOZ Ai 9--Ilea aainww03 31311 Sl1S'!1 e1S alnoddl HS - E a19ef RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 N N 94/940Z-b4/E40Z Ad d12jS 11V2d 0102j RCTC Commuter Rail FY 2013/14 Summary of Funds Requested Shor. Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013114 Project ❑esor110t1on Capital Project Numberilt Total Funds Total Funds wloCarryover LTF LTF Carryover Prop 18 (Security) Fare Box Other SCRRAOpera/ ngExpensast'• 14,931,000 8,931:090 2.402,000 6.000,000 6:485,000 44.000 Transit Connections 250,000 250,000 250,000 RCTC Rail Operations and Securit+y431 2,324,9C0 2.324.900 2,075,9C0 748.000 RCTC Station A4aintenance'`: 1:728:3CD 1,728:300 1:608 300 12C,000 Operating Contingenoyfor additional service''' 2.000.0CD 2,000.090 2 009.000 mil OCTA/Melm/SANBAGShare ofRiV,IEOC• 99 Trains'`^ $38,816,000 $36:818.000 $18493,000 .$20,323,000 Subtotal: Operating $21,234,290 $15,234,200 $8,337,200 $6,000,000 $0 $6,4135,000 $20,735,000 Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades (12113) FY 14 -1 $355,748 $355.:48 $355,748 Subtotal: Capital $355,748 $355,749 $0 $0 $355,748 $0 $0 Total: Operating &Capital 1 $21,589,948 315,589,948 38,337,200 36,603,000 $355,748 $6,485,900 320,735,900 (1) Number ties to Table 4A - Capital Project Justification (2) Based on initial Metrolink Budget (3) Other; S25,000 in PTA pass through funds administered by SLAG per MOu and $23,007 operatng transfer in from intern managementdepanments $200,000 pass through funds from SCRRA farguards (4) Other: 5112,200 in CommuterAssistance pass through funds for Perris Station, $7,900 in vending machine revenue (5) Potential addition aT 2 peak period 91 Liie round trips (6) Reflects Total Expenses and Revenue far the Riverside, IEOC and 91 Lines Revised 5/28/2013 Summary of FY 2013/14 Funds Requested.xls s 3 a31S3f1tm saNru JO J mvin Wns - p 31EIVI r NM= Earside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 14 - 1 PROJECT NAME: Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: • Enhanced remote video surveillance capabilities to allow security personnel, law enforcement and first responders to better monitor and assess incidents at all stations existing and planned. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by FY 2012 and FY 2013 Proposition 1 B Safety and Security funds to improve safety and security at all existing and planned Riverside County Metrolink stations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1B (FY 12/13 Security Funds) $355,748 Total $355, 748 24 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 9I./960Z-176/E1.0Z Ad dIHS 11V21 010H RCTC Commuter Rail FY 2013/14 and FY 2014/15 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Surnrnary of Funds Requested for FY 2014115 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds wto Carryover LTF STA Prop 1 B V {5e-urity} Fare Box Other SORRA Operating Expenses $16,186,800 516,186,800 S9,377,560 $6,809,250 Transit Connections $262,500 $262,500 3262,500 RCTC Rail Operations and Security $2,180,745 $2,180,745 $2,180,745 RCTC Statior Maintenance $1,688,715 $1,688,715 $1,688,715 Subtotal: Operating_ $20,318,760\ 520,318,760 $13,508,510 $D $0 $6,809,250 $0 Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades (13/14) FY 15-1 $350,070 $350,000 $350,000 Subtotal: Capital 1350,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital I $20,6613,760 820,668,760 $13,509,510 $0 $350,000 $6,009,250 $0 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LTF STA Prop 1 B {Security} Fare Box Other SCRRA Operating Expanses $16,996,152 816,996,152 $9,846,428 $7,149,713 Transit Connections $275,637 $275,637 3275,625 RCTC Rall Operations and Security $2,289,794 $2,289,764 $2,289,782 RCTC Statior Maintenance $1,773,162 $1,773,162 $1,773:151 Sulriotal: ❑perating_ $21,334,744 521,334,744 $14,184,986 S6 $0 $7,149,713 $0 Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades (14115)_ 1FY 16-1 $350,000 3350,000 $350,000 Subtotal: Capital_ $350,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000 ` $D $D Total: Operating 8 Capital 1 $21,684,744 S21,684,744 $14,1134,986 $0 $350,000 $7,149,713 $0 a31S3f oal saNru 321 iru JO J mvin Wns - 5 3�8t�1 r NM= Earside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 15 - 1 PROJECT NAME: Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will provide the following: • Enhanced remote video surveillance capabilities to allow security personnel, law enforcement and first responders to better monitor and assess incidents at all stations existing and planned. • Limited and controlled access to stations and platforms in the event of a catastrophic accident or disaster. • Improved lighting and visibility to mitigate the potential of personal injury and criminal activity at the stations. • Battery backup systems to ensure visibility in the event of equipment failure or power outage. • Equipment to assist with evacuation and response in the event of a major incident or disaster. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by FY 2014 Proposition 1 B Safety and Security funds to improve safety and security at all existing and planned Riverside County Metrolink stations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1 B (FY 13/14 Security Funds) $350,000 Total $350, 000 26 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r NM= Earside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 16 - 1 PROJECT NAME: Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will provide the following: • Enhanced remote video surveillance capabilities to allow security personnel, law enforcement and first responders to better monitor and assess incidents at all stations existing and planned. • Limited and controlled access to stations and platforms in the event of a catastrophic accident or disaster. • Improved lighting and visibility to mitigate the potential of personal injury and criminal activity at the stations. • Battery backup systems to ensure visibility in the event of equipment failure or power outage. • Equipment to assist with evacuation and response in the event of a major incident or disaster. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by FY 2015 Proposition 1 B Safety and Security funds to improve safety and security at all existing and planned Riverside County Metrolink stations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1 B (FY 14/15 Security Funds) $350,000 Total $350, 000 27 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission TABLE 6 — STATE TRIENNIAL AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2006/07 — FY 2008/094) Completion Details No findings N/A 4 Triennial performance audit for FY 2006/07 through FY 2008/09 was conducted in FY 2009/10 and completed 8/6/09. 28 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 94/940Z-b4/E40Z Ad d12jS 11V2d 0102j MIN Emmi` GnrrdrSor+y tiaapr P o� Cv•o+ Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review RCTC Commuter Rail Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 3,175,076 Passenger Miles 116,803,590 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Train Hours 17,822.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Car Miles 2,896,316.0 Total Actual Vehicle Train Miles Total Operating Expenses $48,605,1ii ii:1 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $21,060,i Net Operating Expenses $27,545., u u , Performance Indicators Mandatary: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 1 43.32 % 1 >= 40.00% 1 43.35 % 1 Meets Target Discretionary: 1, Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $2,727.25 <_ $3,236.66 $3,162.17 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $8.68 3= $7.41 and [_ $10.03 $9.06 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.24 ]_ $0.21 and [_ $0.29 $0.26 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $1,545.56 :,.._ $1,544.65 and [_ $2,089.83 $1,791.51 Meets Target 5, Subsidy Per Mile $9.51 5= $7.79 and <_ $10.53 $8.29 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 178.20 >= 177.06 and €= 239.55 197.70 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 1.10 s= 0.89 and <= 1.21 0.91 Meets Target 8. Unlinked Passenger Trips 3,175,076 >= 2,212,078 2,279,000 Meets Target 9. Passenger Miles per Rev. Car Miles 40.33 >= 30.52 and [= 41.30 32.11 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 5 out of 9 Discretionary Performance Indicators " g a 6 a e 1 A J 2 L u y d t r T / E T O E A A a L p u e l d t r 1 1 E T O E a L p E u u e d w o o } o T s a i a L p u w n l o o p a e o a a o o s a o u e w a o } a a d u e l d a 4 1 ( e g a 6 a e 1 L e g l a a T l a 9 g a 6 a e 1 s h a d T a 6 a e l p a w o T s l p j T a 6 a e l w o w T a 6 a e l s T a a d 4 a 6 a e l s w e N 8 0 ' T = > P u e C 8 ' 0 = [ 0 8 ' E E E = > D u e T 8 ' ? C T = [ 6 t r O T $ = 5 P u e 5 C ' C $ _ [ 6 E ' o g e 3 = 5 P u e E C ' O C 9 ' T $ = t T E . 0 $ = > P u e E C ' 0 $ = [ E T T T $ = > P U e E E ' 8 $ = 4 9 T ' T 0 0 ' E 8 T E 9 ' O T $ t r T ' E C D ' T $ S E ' 0 $ 6 T ' 6 $ T 6 ' 0 O C ' C 6 T 6 E ' 8 $ T 5 ' T 6 L ' T $ 9 C ' 0 $ 9 0 ' 6 $ 9 0 ' T 0 0 ' E T E 1 7 0 ' 6 $ T T ' 6 0 8 ' T $ b C ' 0 $ V S ' 8 $ a i d a n u a n a a a a d s a a 6 u a s s e d a n o H a n u o n a a a a d s a a 6 u a s s e d a l l N a n u a n a a a a d R p s g n s a n o H a n u a n a a a a d R p s g n s e l l N a a 6 u a s s e d a a d R p s g n g a a 6 u a s s e d a a d R p l s g n g T a 6 a e l s w a N % C ' 0 6 = < % 6 6 ' 7 6 % 5 � ' � 6 7 0 O V � 6 o g e a R a a n o a a a x o g a a e J a u o N S t r ' 9 T $ 0 0 ' 9 T $ 8 0 ' S T $ a a E u a s s e d a a d s I s o o 6 u g e . a d 0 a u o N E T ' 6 T $ E 9 ' 1 7 T $ 9 6 ' S T $ M N a n u a n a a a a d g s o o 6 u g e . a d 0 g a 6 a e l . ; . a d C Z ' t r E E ' E $ = > 8 C ' 6 0 D ' E $ C V E V E $ 9 E ' 9 6 T ' E $ a n o H a n u a n a a a a d s l s o D B u g e . a d p a u o N 0 0 0 ' t r E C ' 8 E $ E S C ' O S 9 ' 0 E $ 8 0 E ' E 0 8 ' S E $ R p p g n s 6 u g e . a d 0 a u o N 0 0 0 ' 8 C 6 ' E E $ 0 0 0 ' E 0 8 ' S T $ E C E ' 9 8 e 6 T $ a n u a n a a a a 6 u a s s e d a u o N 0 0 0 ' E D C ' T S $ E S C ' E S 1 / 9 E $ 0 8 9 ' 6 8 5 ' 9 4 s I s o o 6 u g e . a d 0 a u o N 0 ' 0 8 9 ' E O C ' E 0 ' t r C E ' b 9 S ' E 0 ' 8 E S ' Z S 6 ' E s a l l N l e l o l a u o N 0 ' 0 8 9 ' E O C ' E O ' E S O ' E 6 V E O ' S E 6 ' S 5 8 ' Z s o l i d a n u a n a a a u o N 0 ' 8 C T ' C T 0 ' 6 8 C ' E T 0 ' 0 9 6 1 5 T s a n o H p o i e u o N 0 ' 8 C T ' C T O ' C E S ' T T 0 ' E 9 C ' b T s a n o H a n u a n a a e u o N E 6 8 ' S S T ' E T T 0 0 1 7 ' 8 E 0 ' 0 8 6 E 6 ' 9 E 9 ' 9 0 T s e l w a a 6 u a s s e d T a n - i e l s w a y , ' 8 C 0 ' E T E ' E = C E E E ' E b T ' E 0 0 0 ' 6 C E ' E T C O ' E E D ' E s a a 6 u a s s e d ( e ) R i e m a n u e l d a ; e q - o f - a e a A i e n ; a d a a u e u u a o } i a d u e l d ; a 6 i e 1 t i T / E T O Z A d V T ] � T O Z A i a a v e n a p i g m a A ; o p u g s i o ; e a i p u I a a u e u m p a d E T ] Z T O Z A d Z T ] T T O Z A d s a } n o b H e l l J a i M U L I 1 0 3 J l J Z I ; a a p i n o a d a 3 1 A l a g ��a o d a b a 3 u e u u o } i a d d i n - - 8 a l g e l - V E / E O Z A A / J . ) a r _ J u q - - - a m m o N M R C T C R A I L S R T P F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 - 2 0 1 5 / 1 6 r Niarside (ouniy iionspornorion Commission TABLE 9 — SRTP HIGHLIGHTS Specific highlights of the FY 2013/14 Commuter Rail Plans include: O A 5%+ fare increase; O Begin construction of the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension; O $1 million cost increase due to implementation of positive train control; O Potential service increase on 91 Line; and O Support development of Coachella Valley commuter rail facilities. Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data FY 09/10 Audited FY 10/11 Audited FY 11 /12 Audited FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Planned Systemwide Ridership 2,939,587 2,909,872 3,023,071 3,038,666 3,143,332 Operating Costs per Revenue Hour $$2 906 $3,042 $3,196 $3,162 $3,010 31 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1 1.1 Description of Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 1 1.3 Fixed Route Services 2 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure 2 Ticket Types 3 Fare Increase 4 1.5 Revenue Fleet 4 1.6 Existing and Planned Facilities 4 Commuter Rail Station Management 4 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 6 2.1 Fixed Route Service 6 Riverside Line 6 Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line 7 91 Line 8 2.2 Key Performance Indicators 9 Riverside Line 9 IEOC Line 9 91 Line 9 2.3 Trip Generators and Projected Growth 9 2.4 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 11 Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) 11 Station Improvements and 11 Construction of New Facilities 11 RCTC Station Maintenance 12 Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project 12 CHAPTER 3 — SERVICE CHANGES AND REGIONAL PLANNING 14 3.1 Recent Service Changes 14 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications 14 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion 15 3.4 Coachella Valley Rail Service 15 3.5 LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency 16 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 18 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 18 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program 18 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 18 Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI 18 TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD 19 Alternative Fueled Vehicles 19 TABLE 1 — FLEET INVENTORY 20 TABLE 2 — SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY 21 TABLE 3 - SRTP ROUTE STATISTICS 22 TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED 23 TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF FUTURE FUNDS REQUESTED 25 TABLE 6 - STATE TRIENNIAL AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS 28 TABLE 7 - PERFORMANCE TARGET REPORT 29 TABLE 8 - SRTP PERFORMANCE REPORT 30 TABLE 9 - SRTP HIGHLIGHTS 31 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS BNSF Burlington Northern -Santa Fe Railroad CETAP Community & Environmental Acceptability Process CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Funds CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments EOM Extra -Ordinary Maintenance FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration IEOC Inland Empire -Orange County Line LACMTA Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority LAUS Los Angeles Union Station LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency LTF Local Transportation Funds MOW Maintenance -of -Way NTD National Transit Database OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PTC Positive Train Control PVL Perris Valley Line RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program SANBAG San Bernardino Associated Governments SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SJBL San Jacinto Branch Line SR State Route SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance Funds STIP State Transportation Improvement Program STP Surface Transportation Program Funds TVM Ticket Vending Machine UP Union Pacific Railroad VCTC Ventura County Transportation Commission r `` Riverside (eerily Tronsporrmion Commission CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area Currently, five of the 57 Metrolink stations are located in Western Riverside County. These five stations, Riverside -Downtown, Pedley, La Sierra, West Corona, and North Main Corona, are owned and maintained by RCTC. A �I g litAP NOT TO SiALI 0}� r �q�.,l�' a ������p k' 8 8 8 8 8 ° / 1/44", 0,0 /oe / ,20 n.erroli nkvain..om METRDLINK METROINK ROUTES R PmdopeYdlq line 4 Rol Tramfor Swim R Inlmd EmpinLFnngo County Line ueminlvh.mnak Oronge County line Shared Snean R Rircruide line prnmuk P.& k.Aimr R San Bernardino lino vomvna Coomy Lne C655PMoto RailN.o.Bun R 911.65 IRi.«ride-FolertonUl 9f eiw F.6nvr 15.2010 ,1•1[114 I It 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections Whether traveling to work, school, or one of Southern California's great recreational destinations, Metrolink trains provide a viable alternative to driving alone. Every day, thousands of Southern California residents park their cars and choose Metrolink to commute. The average Metrolink commute from Riverside County is 37 miles. Metrolink trains are also popular with schools throughout the region both transporting students to classes and for field trips. The Metrolink rider profiles are updated every two years. The following is the latest socio-economic data collected in 2012: 1 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission Line Gender: Male Female Riverside Line 46% 54% IEOC Line 50% 50% 91 Line 50% 50% System -wide 50% 50% Ethnicity: Black 19% 12% 19% 17% Hispanic 31 % 23% 25% 27% Asian 19% 6% 18% 13% Native Hawaiian 2% 1 % 2% 2% American Indian 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Caucasian (non -Hispanic) 25% 52% 29% 36% Other 4% 4% 6% 5% Median Income (2010) $84,274 $77,459 $80,357 $76,647 Full -Time Employed 85% 86% 86% 80% Automobile Available 92% 87% 83% 83% 1.3 Fixed Route Services Metrolink regularly operates Monday through Friday. Weekend service operates on a reduced frequency on the IEOC, Orange County and San Bernardino Lines on Saturdays and Sundays with extensions to the Riverside -Downtown Station. IEOC Line Weekend service began July 2006. There is limited service on New Year's Day on the San Bernardino and Antelope Valley Lines. Trains do not normally operate on the following major holidays: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure Metrolink ticket prices are distance -based and calculated on the shortest driving miles between stations. Each station combination is uniquely priced, based on driving miles from one station to the other. A ride from Downtown Riverside to Los Angeles Union Station is a 59 mile one-way trip; a ride from Downtown Riverside to Irvine is a 40 mile trip. The distance charge is currently capped at 80 miles. This pricing program offers a fair and equitable pricing policy. Over time, Metrolink customers traveling the same distances will pay the same price, and short trips will cost less than longer trips. The Metrolink ticket price consists of three elements: a base boarding charge, an additional increment related to the number of miles traveled, and finally a modest increment to permit Metrolink passengers to transfer without requiring an additional fare on selected connecting transit operators and a reduced rate on others. 2 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r INEmi Rircrside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Ticket Types There are five types of regular Metrolink tickets. Several ticket types have been discontinued in an effort to simplify operations and reduce costs. The Personal Care Attendant (PCA) free ride policy will be AI amended to require a $25 per year attendant identification card. One Way Tickets One-way tickets are valid for one trip only, defined as continuous travel away from the origin station to the destination station specified on the ticket. One-way trips must be completed within three hours after purchase of ticket on the day of purchase. The expiration time and date is displayed on the ticket. Types of One-way Tickets sold: Weekday, Youth, Senior/Disabled, Student, and Military. Youth: Child: Student: Senior: Disabled: Military: Discounts Ages 6 to 18 Weekdays -regular fare; Weekends, 25% off one way and round trip tickets Three children, age 5 or under, rides free with an adult using a valid ticket 10% discount on all ticket types with proper ID Age 65 and over with valid photo ID with date of birth; 50% off regular adult fare on one way and round trip tickets, 25% off monthly and 7-day passes With proper ID, 50% off regular adult fare on one way and round trip tickets, 25% off monthly and 7-day passes 10% discount on all fares with valid ID 1 J Round Trip Tickets Round trip tickets are valid for two trips only, from and to the origin station and the destination station marked on the ticket. The first leg of a round trip ticket is valid for three hours from purchase. The return ticket is valid for travel anytime on the same day as the first leg of the trip. Types of round trip tickets sold: Weekday, Adult Weekend, Youth Weekend, Senior/Disabled, and Military. 7-Day Pass Valid for unlimited travel during a seven-day period between station pairs starting on the day when the pass is purchased. Monthly Pass Monthly Passes are valid for unlimited travel between the origin station and destination station printed on the pass during the calendar month. Types of monthly passes: Adult, Senior/Disabled, and Student (sold only to participating schools through Metrolink's administrative office). $10 Weekend Day Pass Metrolink introduces the Weekend Pass for only $10 per person. This pass is good for unlimited systemwide travel on Saturday or Sunday only. The Weekend Day Pass is accepted for free transfers to connecting transit services, except Amtrak. 3 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Niarside (ouniy iionspornorion Commission Fare Increase Since Metrolink began operations in 1992, fares have increased as indicated in the following chart: 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 5% 0% 4% 4.5% 5.5% 3.5% 5.5% 3% 6% 0% 7% 5% Historically, these fare increases have been across-the-board with all ticket types incurring the same price increase. For FY 2013/14 fares will increase 5% subject to hearing on June 28, 2013. In addition to adjusting fares in 2004 to keep pace with inflation, member agencies, including RCTC, also sought a rationalization of the fares charged for travel between the existing Metrolink zones. Over the years, unusual anomalies evolved where stations were placed into zones not necessarily based upon mileage issues but on other local issues. Zone fares were eliminated in July 2005 and replaced by a new fare structure that results in passengers being charged based upon the highway driving mileage between stations. Implementation of this structure was spread over 10 years to minimize financial impacts on individual riders whose particular trip may have been artificially kept low. 1.5 Revenue Fleet The Metrolink fleet is composed of 52 in-service locomotives and 205 commuter rail cars. 20 new cars are being delivered with incremental integration into the fleet throughout 2013. 1.6 Existing and Planned Facilities In planning for a successful commuter rail program in Western Riverside County, RCTC acquired properties for current and future passenger rail service. Commuter Rail Station Management Unlike the other SCRRA county agencies, the Commission owns and operates six rail stations serving Riverside County: • Riverside -Downtown • Pedley • Riverside -La Sierra • North Main Corona • West Corona; and • Perris Multimodal Facility (joint RTA/RCTC facility) 4 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside Coenly Tronsporlmion Commission Station operation and maintenance costs are included in the rail program budget with services coordinated by the Commission's staff. Parking is currently free at the stations. The station operating and maintenance FY 2013/14 budget totals $1,728,300 funded by Western Riverside County Rail Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Measure A and vending machine revenues. The average budget including administration and management overhead is $288,050 per station. San Jacinto Branch Line E ACIOMO COUNTY A 411E MIT y� AIYEASIUE PEMPTIMI «xxxMxHw SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE MEM VALLEY BEAUMONT The Measure A program provides for Riverside County's participation in the creation of a regional commuter rail system. Though the primary goal was to provide service from Riverside to Los Angeles and Orange counties, the Measure A map included a possible internal element along the former Santa Fe Railroad's San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL). The SJBL corridor extends 38.3 miles between Highgrove and Hemet within Riverside County. The alignment roughly follows the Interstate 215 to Perris where it veers east, parallel to State Route 74 to Hemet and San Jacinto. As part of the regional acquisition of Burlington Northern -Santa Fe (BNSF) properties and use rights, RCTC purchased the 38-mile SJBL and adjacent properties in 1993 for $26 million using Western County Rail Measure A and state rail bonds (Prop 108 of 1990). BNSF retained exclusive freight operating rights, serving its customers along the line and maintaining the right-of-way until such time as passenger service is implemented. Planning continues on the Initial Operating Segment (IOS) of the SJBL for the Perris Valley Line. This Line would provide a connection from Moreno Valley's March Air Reserve Base and Perris to mainline rail services in downtown Riverside (see Section 2.5 for more details). 5 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service The SCRRA operates seven commuter rail lines. Three routes, the Riverside, Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC), and 91 Lines, directly serve Western Riverside County, with connecting service available to destinations on the other four lines. Riverside Line This line extends 59.1 miles between the city of Riverside and the Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) along the Union Pacific (UP) Railroad alignment. The route roughly follows the Pomona Freeway corridor (SR60) through the cities and communities of Pedley, Mira Loma, Ontario, Pomona, Walnut, Industry, La Puente, Montebello, and Commerce. Existing stations include Riverside -Downtown, Pedley, East Ontario, Downtown -Pomona, Industry, Montebello/Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, SANBAG, and the LACMTA jointly fund the line. Currently, five peak -period round -trips and one off-peak round-trip operate Monday through Friday. Daily peak - period AM boardings have averaged 2,501 during March 2013. Approximately 29.6% of the morning boardings occur at Riverside County's two stations on this line, Riverside -Downtown and Pedley.1 The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) fixed routes and Amtrak provide connecting transit service in Riverside County. The scheduled peak -direction trip time between downtown Riverside and LAUS varies between 83 and 88 minutes, including dwell time at intermediate stations. Riverside Line Line Opening: June 1993 Route miles: 59.1 Avg Trip Length (miles): 39.3 Trains Operated/Day: 12 Avg FY12/13 Weekday Ridership: 4,989 FY13/14 Budget Operating Subsidy/Passenger Mile: Farebox Recovery: Revenue Recovery (MOW/ROW): $0.15 57.1 % 58.6% Current Stations Served Riverside -Downtown 4066 Vine Street Pedley 6001 Pedley Road East Ontario 3330 E Francis St Downtown -Pomona 101 N Main Street Industry 600 S Brea Canyon Rd Montebello/Commerce 2000 Flotilla St LA Union Station 800 N Alameda St ' Source: AM Peak -Period (Peak Direction) Boardings, March 2013 6 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r IMENI Niarside (ouniy iionspornnrion Commission Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line This line extends 100.1 miles between the city of San Bernardino, in San Bernardino County, and Irvine and San Juan Capistrano, in Orange County, with limited extensions in Oceanside. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeway (SR91) along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) San Bernardino Subdivision in Riverside and Orange County. This commuter rail service to Orange County provides a transportation alternative in one of the busiest corridors in Southern California. The Line is a jointly funded project of the RCTC, SANBAG, and OCTA. When the service began in October 1995, it was the first suburb -to -suburb commuter rail line in the country. One station in San Bernardino County, four stations within Riverside County, eight stations within Orange County, and one station in San Diego County now serve the line. In July 2012 RCTC added one additional peak round-trip for a total of five peak - period round -trips, and three off-peak round -trips operating Monday through Friday. Morning boardings averaged 2,246 during March 2013. Approximately 88.7% of the morning boardings occurred at Riverside County's four stations on this line, at Riverside -Downtown, Riverside - La Sierra, North Main Corona, and West Corona.2 IEOC weekend service began on July 15, 2006. This route was modeled after the successful RCTC-chartered Beach Trains. The service has been reduced to one round trip leaving from San Bernardino to Oceanside in the morning and returning in the afternoon on Saturday and Sunday. The trains make all IEOC stops, plus the San Clemente Pier. The current running time between downtown Riverside and Irvine is approximately 68 minutes. RTA, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting transit service. IEOC Line Line Opening: October 1995 Route miles: 100.1 Avg Trip Length (miles): 33.8 Trains Operated/Day: 14 Avg FY12/13 Weekday Ridership: 4,429 FY13/14 Budget: Operating Subsidy/Passenger Mile: Farebox Recovery: Revenue Recovery (MOW/ROW): Current Stations Served: San Bernardino Riverside -Downtown Riverside -La Sierra North Main Corona West Corona Anaheim Canyon Orange Santa Ana Tustin Irvine Laguna Niguel San Juan Capistrano San Clemente San Clemente Pier" Oceanside *Weekends only $0.36 34.5% 36.5% 1204 West 3rd St 4066 Vine Street 10901 Indiana Ave 250 E Blaine St 155 S Auto Center Dr 1039 N Pacificenter Dr 194 N Atchison St 1000 E Santa Ana BI 2975 Edinger Ave 15215 Barranca Pkwy 28200 Forbes Rd 26701 Verdugo St 1850 Avenida Estacion Avenida del Mar 235 S Tremont Ave 2 Source: AM Peak -Period (Peak Direction) Boardings, March 2013 7 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission 91 Line This route officially began operating peak -period service on May 6, 2002. The route extends 61.6 miles between Riverside and Downtown Los Angeles. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeway (SR91) along the BNSF San Bernardino subdivision through Riverside County to Fullerton in Orange County where it continues northwest to downtown Los Angeles. Existing stations that serve this line include Riverside -Downtown, Riverside -La Sierra, North Main Corona, West Corona, Fullerton, Buena Park, Norwalk, Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, OCTA, and the LACMTA jointly fund the Line. The service levels on this route are still developing. Currently, there are two AM peak -period trips from Riverside to Los Angeles with two PM peak period returns. There are two AM peak period trips from Los Angeles to Riverside with one PM peak period return and one mid day off-peak round-trip. This service operates Monday through Friday. Morning boardings averaged 1,182 during March 2013. Approximately 68.9% of the morning boardings occur at Riverside County's four stations on this line, at Riverside -Downtown, Riverside - La Sierra, North Main Corona, and West Corona.3 The peak -period running time between downtown Riverside and Los Angeles is approximately 90 minutes. RTA, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting service in Riverside County. 91 Line Line Opening: May 2002 Route miles: 61.6 Avg Trip Length (miles): 36.6 Trains Operated/Day: 9 Avg FY12/13 Weekday Ridership: 2,448 FY13/14 Budget: Operating Subsidy/Passenger Mile: Farebox Recovery: Revenue Recovery (MOW/ROW): Current Stations Served: Riverside -Downtown Riverside -La Sierra North Main Corona West Corona Fullerton Buena Park Norwalk Commerce LA Union Station $0.25 44.3% 45.2% 4066 Vine St 10901 Indiana Ave 250 E Blaine St 155 S Auto Center Dr 120 E Santa Fe Ave Lakeknoll Dr & Dale St 12700 Imperial Highway 6433 26th St 800 N Alameda St Source: AM Peak -Period (Peak Direction) Boardings, March 2013 8 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironsporinion Commission 2.2 Key Performance Indicators RCTC will use the following performance indicators provided by SCRRA to measure the effectiveness of the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 Lines: 91 Line Indicator FY11/12 Audited FY12/13 Projected FY13/14 Plan Unlinked Passenger Trips 586,410 633,511 643,245 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.19 $0.23 $0.25 Farebox Recovery Ratio 52.4% 47.5% 44.3% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.40 $0.45 $0.45 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $6.90 $8.54 $9.10 Operating Expense/Train Mile $61.49 $73.12 $72.53 Revenue Recovery 53.4% 48.5% 45.2% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 4 car set) 37.83 36.46 40.35 1EOC Line Indicator FY11/12 Audited FY12/13 Projected FY13/14 Plan Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,037,633 1,139,347 1,207,326 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.41 $0.35 $0.36 Farebox Recovery Ratio 29.5% 34.9% 34.5% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.60 $0.56 $0.56 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $13.10 $11.97 $12.04 Operating Expense/Train Mile $74.19 $66.12 $68.45 Revenue Recovery 32.1 % 37.2% 36.5% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 4 car set) 30.78 33.00 34.11 Riverside Line Indicator FY11/12 Audited FY12/13 Projected FY13/14 Plan Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,319,157 1,402,218 1,292,761 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.12 $0.12 $0.15 Farebox Recovery Ratio 58.5% 59.2% 57.1 % Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.30 $0.32 $0.36 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $4.56 $4.85 $5.81 Operating Expense/Train Mile $81.92 $95.53 $97.31 Revenue Recovery 60.6% 60.9% 58.6% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 5 car set) 66.97 72.36 75.67 2.3 Trip Generators and Projected Growth Feeder services to stations are vital to the success of commuter rail in Western Riverside County. Coordination and consultation with transit providers and local 9 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Niarside (ouniy iionspornorion Commission agencies is an ongoing process. Connecting transit to stations in Western Riverside County is provided by RTA, Sunline, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser. RTA, RCTC, and Metrolink continue to work together to increase awareness of the RTA bus connections at the RCTC Metrolink stations. Ads regularly appear in the RTA Ride Guide promoting free RTA transfers from Metrolink stations. The Ride Guide includes the five Metrolink stations in its Route Directory Listing. Additionally, Metrolink occasionally helps promote the RTA CommuterLink service in materials at the stations. In addition to its fixed routes, RTA developed CommuterLink to address commuter needs. This express service provides transit to and from Riverside Metrolink stations and transit centers during peak commuting periods. The program aims to provide a viable transit alternative for commuters, helping mitigate congestion and pollution. The Corona Cruiser, operated by the City of Corona, provides a fixed route schedule but offers some route deviation with advance reservation. Buses run Monday through Saturday and serves the North Main Corona Station as well as stops throughout Corona. Beginning Fall 2013, Sunline began operating commuter express service connecting residents of the Coachella Valley with the Pass Area and Western Riverside County. The service addresses the transit service gap between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County, providing alternative transportation options to commuting residents of Coachella Valley. For over 10 years, RCTC has actively supported transit connections by establishing agreements with SCRRA and the Riverside County transit providers to provide free transfers for all connecting transit services at Riverside County stations. With the agreement, Metrolink ticket holders can ride both fixed route and Dial -A -Ride services for free as they travel to and from a station in Riverside County. RCTC subsidizes half the fare while Metrolink subsidizes the other half. Feeder buses and transit services are also critically important at the destination end. For the IEOC route, dedicated OCTA shuttle buses meet all peak -period trains at Anaheim Canyon, Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin, and Irvine. Some OCTA buses meet trains at all these stations as well as Laguna Niguel, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente. 10 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r INEmi Rircrside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission 2.4 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs Commuters boarding at RCTC Metrolink stations are provided with amenities that assist with their daily travel needs. Vending machines stocked with beverages and snacks are available at each station. Station facilities also include wireless internet access, bike lockers, designated parking for motorcycles and carpools. Furthermore, all stations are staffed 24 hours by contracted security guards, closed circuit television, and various safety and security enhancements such as fencing and gates. Amenities are also available onboard the train. All train cars are equipped with restrooms, and some of the newer cars contain hook-ups for laptop computers. Additionally designated bike cars and quiet cars have been added throughout the system. Metrolink has developed the website www.metrolinktrains.com. This site provides passengers with enhanced features allowing for greater content functionality. Improvements include regular service updates on the homepage, improved content management functions, enhanced usability and a more consistent look and feel with features expected by our increasingly web savvy passengers. Additionally, passengers can now subscribe through Twitter to obtain service updates and plan their trips using Google Transit. Major needs, which continue to be the focus of RCTC attention for the SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16, include the following: • Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC); and • Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project. Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) PTC has been a major technical undertaking and initial operating elements should be implemented by the end of 2013. PTC will continue to be a priority for Metrolink and RCTC to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The $210 million capital project has been jointly funded by the member agencies and will be implemented prior to the federal deadline of 2015. Station Improvements and Construction of New Facilities In order to meet the capacity needs of current and future system growth and expansion, the following facilities will be completed or commenced in the upcoming fiscal year: • Construction of a covered passenger waiting and concession area at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station; and 11 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission • New Operations Control Center at Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station to expand and enhance existing security and station surveillance operations. RCTC Station Maintenance The Commission fully funds and maintains all of the commuter rail stations in Riverside County, which is unique among the Metrolink member agencies. Since Metrolink service began along the Riverside Line in 1993, the Commission has been maintaining the Riverside Downtown and Pedley stations. When the Inland Empire -Orange County Line began in 1995, the La Sierra and West Corona stations were added. Due to increasing demand, the North Main Corona station was added in 2002. Over the years, the stations show their age and require preventative maintenance. The Commission has always taken pride in the commuter rail stations and intends to invest $2 million to preserve the Commission's assets. Anticipated improvements include: • Comprehensive painting of station structures • Resealing of station parking lots • Improved access for disabled patrons • Drought tolerant landscaping upgrades Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project From 1999 to 2000, funding commitments to the SJBL were sporadic. RCTC successfully implemented the SJBL in the Federal Transportation Efficiency Act for the Twenty -First Century (TEA-21), making it an eligible FTA New Start rail project. In 1998, Congress appropriated $500,000 to the SJBL. These funds have since been drawn down to conduct an Alternatives Analysis, "The San Jacinto Branch Line/1-215 Corridor Study." Through prior action, the Commission has allocated $20 million for the implementation of passenger rail service between Riverside and Perris on the SJBL. In June 2003, the Commission re -adopted the Locally Preferred Alternative as an IOS, the Perris Valley Line (Riverside - Moreno Valley -Perris) Metrolink extension of the 91 Line. This extension consists of four peak -period round trips supplemented by a midday round trip. All trains will operate from Perris to Los Angeles via Riverside. The estimated cost to implement the new service is $248 million, for a start up of service by late 2015. Staff has identified the additional federal, state, and local sources needed to fund this project. RCTC has received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), RCTC has completed project development and final design. RCTC is currently seeking approval of the Small Start Grant Agreement (SSGA) from FTA to provide up to $75 million for the project. The entire federal amount has been set aside for RCTC in the Federal Budget. RCTC has identified sufficient local funds for its share of the project. 12 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (cozily ironspor mion Conn ion The Commission has received the following grant funds to date in support of the project: Received Measure A CMAQ 64,031,738 2,907,000 FTA 5307 16,157,453 FTA 5309 1,960,000 STP 500,000 FTA 5307 10,000,000 CMAQ 4,298,000 Pending CMAQ 36,514,263 FTA 5309 74,999,999 TOTAL 211,368,453 13 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission CHAPTER 3 — SERVICE CHANGES AND REGIONAL PLANNING 3.1 Recent Service Changes On July 2, 2012, Metrolink expanded its Inland Empire Orange County weekday service, adding one additional daily peak roundtrip. 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications The RCTC rail program consists of planning, programming, advocacy and implementation elements. This SRTP incorporates a variety of activities which support these elements. The FY 2013/14 Capital and Operating Plan reflects the efficiencies implemented since Metrolink's inception. Proposed service maximizes the use of existing rolling stock to relieve overcrowding. The FY 2013/14 proposed budget is under review by all of the member agencies and concurrence is anticipated by June 2013. Riverside Line Service Level Changes No change. 1E0C Line Service Level Changes No change. 91 Line Service Level Changes Two additional peak period round trips are proposed. OPERATING SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS FOR FY2013/14 Line/Route Weekday Trains Saturday Trains Sunday Trains Riverside 12 Riverside -LA (UP) 4 Riverside -LA* 4 Riverside -LA* IEOC 3 San Bernardino - Irvine 2 San Bernardino - Laguna Niguel 2 San Bernardino - San Juan Capistrano 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 1 Riverside - Irvine 3 Riverside - Laguna Niguel 2 Riverside - Oceanside 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 91/Riv-Ful-LA 9 Riverside -LA (BNSF) *Trains run via the San Bernardino Line The Commission's goal in participating in a regional commuter rail system is to provide useful transportation alternatives to its residents. To a large degree, this goal has already been achieved. Each morning, over 3,000 Riverside residents board one of 12 Metrolink trains headed for jobs in Orange and Los Angeles counties. These rail commuters also contribute to a reduction in freeway traffic, removing more than 1.5 lanes of peak hour traffic each morning and each afternoon. 14 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission Notwithstanding this success, a commuter rail service is unlike most of the projects funded by the Commission. The complete benefits of the project are not fully realized upon completion of construction or initial implementation of service. The commuter rail service must increase frequency as the demand increases over time. This increase in service is constrained by the availability of rail vehicles, capacity on the railroad, and available funding. Currently, not all of the Riverside County routes operate at optimal service levels. Two of the three Metrolink lines do not even offer minimum basic coverage during peak travel times. The IEOC and the 91 Line do not yet provide half- hourly headways and thus, their attractiveness to residents and ultimately their ridership and revenue performance are compromised. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion Metrolink will continue outreach to new residents through direct -mail campaigns to homeowners within the system's sphere of service in Riverside County. Additionally, Metrolink is developing a targeted marketing strategy with all its member agencies. RCTC has budgeted for targeted promotion of service during the summer months. 3.4 Coachella Valley Rail Service The concept of developing an expanded passenger rail service from Los Angeles to Indio and the Coachella Valley has been discussed for many years. The plan includes new daily round trip Amtrak trains to the Coachella Valley provided through the Amtrak/Caltrans state partnership. RCTC in conjunction with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), Caltrans Division of Rail and the Federal Railroad Administration will begin the first phase of detailed corridor planning with the initiation of the Service Development Plan (SDP). This SDP will be the first major study that will carefully design a viable service plan with appropriate ridership and service modeling plans. The effort along with completion of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the corridor will allow it to compete for future federal funding. RCTC worked closely with Caltrans to initiate the Alternatives Analysis that has been completed and shows promising ridership potential for the new route. RCTC plans on taking the lead on the Service Development Plan study and intends to use Prop 1 B funds to help support the project. In addition, there is local support for this effort from the CVAG Executive Committee who recently directed staff to establish a 90% bus transit/10% passenger rail service funding allocation split for Coachella Valley TDA funds to be phased in over a 3-4 year period. In addition, a MOU will be established between RCTC and CVAG to develop a Coachella Valley Rail Fund that will use both the TDA funds and additional state and local funds to conduct station development studies and provide initial capital funding for station development. It has been determined through numerous studies over the years that the Amtrak intercity option is preferred over a Metrolink commuter option, because of the long trip length and added comfort and amenities on the Amtrak trains and also Amtrak's contractual rights to operate over freight railroads. 15 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 MEM NM= 1 Riarsitle foliar Tionsp oricn fo nmissien LOS ANGELES COUNTY STATION FULLERTON x vuccr LINDA STA • ON ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED LOS ANGELES TO INDIO INTERCITY RAIL SERVICE SAN BERNARDINO Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Tracks COUNTY Union Pacific Railroad Tracks Existing Station with Rail Connections 0 G Proposed Station sax" REDLANDS/ LOMA LINDA STATION RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN STATION RIVERSIDE COUNTY WEN BANNING/ B£AUMONT aemluc STATION ceaem CABAZON 9TATIDN LW. PALM SAAINOS rarroH RANCFIOCALIMENIRAGTEE/ AGUd srnrroH ran ,0111111. INDIO DOWNTOWN srarroN 3.5 LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is a joint powers authority (JPA) created to oversee the intercity passenger rail service in the travel corridor between San Diego and Los Angeles. This agency has evolved as rail service has been extended to Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo Counties and now includes all counties along the Pacific Surfliner Corridor from San Diego to San Luis Obispo County. The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is tasked with the following functions: • Plan, recommend programs, promote, and identify funding sources for improvements to passenger rail services and facilities in the LOSSAN corridor; • Negotiate for and accept funds to be expended for the purpose of providing and improving intercity and commuter passenger rail services and activities; • Review and comment on facility, service, and operational plans and programs of the agency or agencies operating sub -corridor commuter rail service in the LOSSAN corridor; • Coordinate facility, service, and operational plans and programs with other organizations providing passenger rail service in the Southern California region; and 16 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r INEmi Rircrside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission • Advocate improvements to services and facilities for the corridor before local, regional, state, and federal officials and agencies. The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency does not pay for the operation of any of the passenger rail services within the corridor, but it is a means to help coordinate operations and planning. RCTC has been an active ex-officio member since 2011 and with the recently revised Joint Powers Authority MOU; RCTC is now a full voting member. The passage of Senate Bill 1225 signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September 2012 sets the stage for local control. This bill established a process for transferring the administrative responsibilities for the state -supported intercity passenger rail service along the corridor from Caltrans to a locally governed joint powers authority. This local authority would have more control over schedules, operations, fares, marketing, and coordination with other transit operators. Currently, LOSSAN is in this transfer period and is looking to select a managing agency in Southern California to take the lead and coordinate the Interagency Transfer Agreement with Caltrans. These efforts require financial support that is prohibited from coming from Caltrans. RCTC, along with the other member agencies, will be contributing to the start up operations and will be actively engaged in the development of rail service in Southern California. 17 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget This SRTP reflects the Commission's commitment to the commuter rail goals in the FY 2013/14 RCTC Budget: • Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving Riverside County; • Extend commuter rail service to Moreno Valley and Perris via the San Jacinto Branch Line; and • Maximize opportunities for public use of rail -related investments. Specific highlights of the FY 2013/14 Budget include: • Begin Construction of the Perris Valley Line (Riverside - Moreno Valley - Perris) Metrolink extension project; • Implement Positive Train Control in the Metrolink network; • An increase in operating subsidy due to PTC costs. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program With the passage of Measure A in 1988, $100 million was identified and committed to the development and implementation of a commuter rail system to serve Riverside County residents. The Rail Department uses LTF for operation as well as federal 5307, 5309, 5337 and state Proposition 1 B funds for capital. RCTC holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven member Board. RCTC staff members serve on the five -county Technical Advisory Committee which negotiates service and funding levels based upon the counties' established priorities. Staff also provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and RCTC departments, and linkages to local communities. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Public participation regarding service levels is largely garnered through the bi-annual on -board survey. Public hearings are held prior to any service changes. Daily receipt of feedback from the public is sought through Metrolink's 1-800-371-LINK (5465) and website www.metrolinktrains.com. Additionally, RCTC maintains a customer service number (951) 778-1092, provides service updates through Twitter and receives comments through the www.rctc.org website. Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI SCRRA is responsible for the regulatory and compliance requirements governing the use of federal and state funds in accordance with ADA and Title VI. Accordingly, RCTC 18 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r Riverside (ouniy iionspurorion tommission is responsible for additional compliance requirements as it relates to station facilities. All Metrolink trains and stations are accessible to persons with disabilities. TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD The RCTC TDA Triennial Audit was completed in September, 2010. The last audit resulted in no findings as pertained to the Rail Program. The FTA Triennial Audit completed in August 2013 resulted in no findings for RCTC. NTD is reported annually by both SCRRA and RCTC. Alternative Fueled Vehicles Metrolink operates low emission diesel locomotives. These state of the art high - efficiency and low -emission locomotives greatly enhance the existing fleet. 19 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 TABLE 1 - FLEET INVENTORY ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑C 664'L99'44 0 .99 ZO£ 8:9 uncWb . apo0 1a21:eAu6r1 Jeq;O a9uoacc Pa103 t•L6'cOL £49'999'L 01Z ZEL 9A 0 09 09 913A3119 22Z OLOZ VdJN'4 Vd00'9 dU'20 san'2 09 99944 wainti . apo0 10Jn:LV10,41 Jaggy aquocaC 100109 475'LOL 599'L937 017 17L 59 0 45 t 919A9119 2Z2 OLn7 VdiN 4 55d00.g da En Sen 7 45 Z91444 W11188 0 0 0 LEL S9 0 0 0 I00-,-10 LSd Ea; vn VdlL L dd ZO san Z S. L6L5£ Pules 984'002 L£9'L99 0 0 89 i❑ 4O 0 0 EL 9Zd111 IcYY 6009 VdiN 4 Vdoo 9 It -lc saA is Z. 58L5£ ioal0598L'OOZ 4Z8'LO. O 0 89 AO 'PO 0 0 L SCAN Ign 900Z VddN'4 Vd00'9 -1 'LC "A2 Z NESE peps £0E'D4a 009'SZ9 01Z DEL 9A 0 61 LL 912A2119 Y109 0 8551 VdiN'4 VdOO'S d8I 20 sBn'L L. 199L1 Pola588L'Z90': 9.5'90 OLZ 641. 99 0 Z Z 91EA2119 1^4O9 4061 VddN'4 Vd00'9 c1H20 Sen'Z Z NOLL P0109 90E'L94 1.8'09 0 0 89 JO'PO 0 0 Otd Oho 9951 VddN'4 Vd00'2 it 'IC Lon'L L D549 P0103 401.'899 Z49'E02 0 0 85 dCl.'40 0 0 4 I1-469d Oho 0 LODZ _0 Z *100'9 1'1C 85J1'E 4 46L9 L'0103996'959 9ED'£4L'1 01Z 04L 90 0 92 9Z 91203113 INO3 0 LOOZ _02 Vd00'9 LK:I20 LBA2 9Z MD P0105 464'506 602'EL0 01Z DEL 00 0 ZL LI, 912A3119 NO9 0 L651 Vdi41'4 VdOO'0 d2J 20 s0.1.2 2: 26L9 112128101n41% 1.1Z'494'1. 01Z 541. S9 0 O£ OE 912A2119 INO9 0 COOL Vd841'4 Vd00'9 dU20 'RA2 OE L9L9 100109 Z004LOZ'L L0VL194Z 01Z 541- 9A 0 89 95 912A2119 NOS 0 2661 VddN'4 Vd00'9 dU 20 MA .Z 09 DBL9 P0109 DOg'DL8 129'40L 0 0 95 i0'40 0 0 Z 11-d658 011g9 0 9661 tlddN 4 VdOO'S M'1C EN,'2 L 68.19 Loala9 1.05'0!9 179n04 0 0 95 AO'40 0 0 9 11-d65i OLtiO 0 568L VdiN'4 VdOO'S TELL 99A2 8 99L9 Pa1a9 55E:.25 £94'SO£ 0 0 85 AO 4C1 n n 9 kd9S3 OINE1 £0311 VdiN 4 Y1dOO .g It -1C 'Mk E 9 LOL9 P111a5 1)69',ZU'4 1:19SVIA1 0 0 a9 AD 411 0 0 91. PdViA :1h0 Z6t<1 VddN 4 Vd00 S 1t "LC sit,. Z y:. NM iasl_ apoLu ap!yaA poua. Raecto Apede0 060,. ap0O sgF!yaA sap!yaA pa!,dL! JaquunAl ap0O alnPikroon aarog 91.:10O *0O PQW. ;S2U 'OI.Ab epNet% JeL/Laue anraV Eu46a010 0uipueq u•_a0g 4 y;Euai edhy lenf l.:ue2ucuoO empseooy aa.alyen, ppm Auipenueyy ,o.eaA Fa an», 6Llpund dquewnO etYiy pecso!pec Lem, uI 8;019O RI pas- Jed saliw sapcaaA apgan koenaLu3 [yOy,I aarpy ,a apI4aA sap NCP, awga;ll anray uo ;c Jaquwnry 0651. uagwnN ,o a6eJ00V ssl!111e101 to l-0V 10,ILLrN sapg117,gC 4:un sucznicav Jo J0q w 1N n c 1 6 d o u w y f _ 4 B 1 • q s :eavvvs aO :epo Ly IOE'Vi L+aLuer.w eplyeA enueney :eLuery LLUOA e:M0 Bu1110,M L;s0Z J.21 gFevdey 4104^4' I1ea Ie0e0eb vwaL.13L0,408 :every 40u11611 L519:01 CLLN RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 O N 94/940Z-174/E403 Ad dThS 11V?d 010b �MME� tolarFbmprhairsibnaredm Table 2 -- IWTC Cemmutermail -- SR TP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010f 11 Audited Pf 2011f 12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Tda l Operating E xpe rs es $43,220,592 $45,589,680 $48,605,000 $32,403,336 $51,702,000 Tidal Pass erger Fare Revenue $14,733,018 $19,786,372 $21,060,000 $12,877,455 $22,978,000 Net Operating Expenses(5Lbsicies) 128,487,574 T25,803,308 T27,545,000 $19,525,881 $28,724,000 Operating Characteristics Unli rked Pa sse rg er Trips 2,909,872 3,023,071 3,175,076 2,019,495 3,143,332 Passerger Piles 102,765,342 106,656,434 116,803,590 71,058,286 115,155,893 Trial Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 14,207.0 14,263.0 17,822.0 9,934.0 17,178.0 Trial Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (6) 2,674,115.0 2,855,935.0 2,896,316.0 2,141,074.0 2,703,680.0 Trial Actual Vehicle Miles 2,770,204.0 2,952,532.0 2,296..316.0 2,204,961.0 2,709,620.0 Performance Characteristics Cpe rat ing Cost per Revenue Hour $3,042.20 $3,196.36 $2,727.25 $3,261.86 $3,009.78 Farebox Recover), Ratio 34.09 % 43.40 % 4 3.32 % 39.74% 44.44% Subsidy per Passenger $3.79 $3.54 $8.68 $3.67 $9.14 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.28 $0.24 $0.24 $0.27 $0.25 Subsidy per Re verve Hour (a) $2,005.18 $1,809.11 $1,545.56 $1,965.56 $1,672.14 Subsidy per Re verve Mile (6) $10.65 $9.04 $9.51 $9.12 $10.62 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 204.8 212 .0 178.2 203.3 183.0 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.09 136 1.10 0.94 1.16 (a) Train Hours fcr Rail Modes. (b) Car Niles Far Rail Modes. 9I'I VE87 Z9'Oa VI' EL9I$ VI'a %17V b SV9I$ ZI'6I$ 8f 600'E$ sleloi . o,y a�uaas 6E' I 16' 0 9V I OSZ S'94" Z'0C" SE' 8:t CZ' I I $ Eb' EI $ Of 605I$ E9' 8I8I$ EZ'bCS I$ SI'0$ CE'0$ SE'0$ ZO'9$ Zb' ZI $ SZ'6$ %II'iS 1,0'1,1$ 84'6I$ 9E'OZS'E$ 969VtE S6'8I$ 6I'CI$ 0Z'SC C'Z$ %all, 09'9I$ 0Z'1,Z$ Z8'4Z8'Z$ Ie Pl .,ladl-7178 Ie P1 70E1-7178 Ie Pl I6-7178 alg., aad 5.1061.1053ed a noH .aad 5.106•05sed a1SJ nuana y aad RpPgng a noH .114 nuanad aa6uassed aad RpFgns aad gns .1061.1055rd ofley aad Rp!sgns R,ano�ay xoga.aeA aa61.105sed BIH, a.nuanay anoil anuanaa .lad I503 aad 1.0 aad Is03 6mleaa do 6upeaa do adRI Rea # Blood saoaeolpui aoueuuollad s��21 IIV b1/Ei0ZAi 9 --Ilea 331nww001 31gd so!ls/lel5 alnot( d1 US - S a19Q1 ,w64m.) 000'1,Z C'8Z$ 000'8i 6'Z Z$ 000'ZO C'I S$ 0089'E OC'Z 0'089'EOZ 0'8 CI'.I 0'8LI'CI E68'SSI'SII ZEE'Ebi'E sleloi as pp oad aouaas 000'1,8 f.f$ 000'I669,a 000'646'S$ 000'CE E'0I$ 000'SE 8'C$ 000'9E C'b$ 000'I6I'8I$ 000'9C 000'SC 9'0a Cr S 6C'I E6 O'bbf0 EE'I 011,11f b O'S6C'IE6 O'bbf0 En 0'I bi'Ibh O'9SI'S O'Ebn O'6CC'E O'9EI'S 0'an O'6LC'E L06'608'06 6" 9'C 08' 0b C9 C'ZbS'EZ I9C'ZEZ'1 9Z E'C OZ'1 StE'E49 le Pl ordcl-J178 le Pl 70EQ-J178 le P1 I6-J178 RpP qng IaN anay lso3 sal W sal W .1061.105sed 6ugeaadp leloi anuanay sanoil sanoil leloi anuanay aa61.105sed saa 6uassed sap�ya� steal .14 Rea #alloy quawa 13 ele a sainoa IIV bl/ETOZ Ai 9--Ilea aainww03 31311 Sl1S'!1 e1S alnoddl HS - E a19ef RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 N N 94/940Z-174/E403 Ad dThS 11`0:1 010b RCTC Commuter Rail FY 2013/14 Summary of Funds Requested Short Rance Transit Plan Table d - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013114 Project Description Caa ltal Project Nurrbert': Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LT LTF Carryover Prop 1B ,Security) Fare Box Other SCRRA Operating Expenses°" 14:931.000 893'.000 2,492,000 6,000,000 6.485,000 44,000 Transit Connections 250.000 250,000 250,000 RCTC Rail Operations and Securi ''' 2,324,900 2324,900 2,078,900 248,000 RCTC Station Maintenancer; 1.728.300 1 726.300 1.698,300 129,000 Operating Contingency for additional seNice' 2.000.000 2000.000 2,090,D00 ri ri OCTANIetrorSANSAGShare ofRJV:IE0C,91Trainar) $35,616,,G00 $3,5616,000 $1B,493,000 $4323:� Subtotal: Operating $21,234,200 $15,234,200 $13,337,200 38,000,000 $D $6,4135,000 $412,000 Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades (12/13) FY 14-1 5355,748 $355.748 $355,748 Subtotal: Capital $355,748 $355,748 30 $0 $355,748 SO $0 Total: Operating 8 Capital $21,589,948 $15,589,949 18,337,200 $6,000,000 $355,748 $6,485,000 $412,0CC (1) Numberties to Table 4A- Capital Project Justification (2) Based on initial Metrolink Budget (3) Other. 925.000 in FTA pass through funds administered by SLAG per MOIJ and S23.000 operating transfer in from intern management departments: 3200.000 pass through funds from SCR RA for guards (4) Other. 9112,200 in Commuter Assistaice pass through funds for Perris Station; $7,800 in venditig machine revenue (5) Potential addRlon or 2 dear period a1 Line round trips (5) Reteats Total Expenses and Revenue for the Riverside, IEOC and 91 Lines Revised 5130P2C13 SuTimary of FY 2013114 Funds Requested.xls s 3 431S3f10321 SdNnJ 30 A i` wins - p 31EIVI r NM= Earside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 14 - 1 PROJECT NAME: Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: • Enhanced remote video surveillance capabilities to allow security personnel, law enforcement and first responders to better monitor and assess incidents at all stations existing and planned. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by FY 2012 and FY 2013 Proposition 1 B Safety and Security funds to improve safety and security at all existing and planned Riverside County Metrolink stations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1B (FY 12/13 Security Funds) $355,748 Total $355, 748 24 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 9I./960Z-176/E1.0Z Ad dIHS 11V21 010H RCTC Commuter Rail FY 2013/14 and FY 2014/15 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Surnrnary of Funds Requested for FY 2014115 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds wto Carryover LTF STA Prop 1 B V {5e-urity} Fare Box Other SORRA Operating Expenses $16,186,800 516,186,800 S9,377,560 $6,809,250 Transit Connections $262,500 $262,500 3262,500 RCTC Rail Operations and Security $2,180,745 $2,180,745 $2,180,745 RCTC Statior Maintenance $1,688,715 $1,688,715 $1,688,715 Subtotal: Operating_ $20,318,760\ 520,318,760 $13,508,510 $D $0 $6,809,250 $0 Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades (13/14) FY 15-1 $350,070 $350,000 $350,000 Subtotal: Capital 1350,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital I $20,6613,760 820,668,760 $13,509,510 $0 $350,000 $6,009,250 $0 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LTF STA Prop 1 B {Security} Fare Box Other SCRRA Operating Expanses $16,996,152 816,996,152 $9,846,428 $7,149,713 Transit Connections $275,637 $275,637 3275,625 RCTC Rall Operations and Security $2,289,794 $2,289,764 $2,289,782 RCTC Statior Maintenance $1,773,162 $1,773,162 $1,773:151 Sulriotal: ❑perating_ $21,334,744 521,334,744 $14,184,986 S6 $0 $7,149,713 $0 Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades (14115)_ 1FY 16-1 $350,000 3350,000 $350,000 Subtotal: Capital_ $350,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000 ` $D $D Total: Operating 8 Capital 1 $21,684,744 S21,684,744 $14,1134,986 $0 $350,000 $7,149,713 $0 a31S3f oal saNru 321 iru JO J mvin Wns - 5 3�8t�1 r NM= Earside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 15 - 1 PROJECT NAME: Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will provide the following: • Enhanced remote video surveillance capabilities to allow security personnel, law enforcement and first responders to better monitor and assess incidents at all stations existing and planned. • Limited and controlled access to stations and platforms in the event of a catastrophic accident or disaster. • Improved lighting and visibility to mitigate the potential of personal injury and criminal activity at the stations. • Battery backup systems to ensure visibility in the event of equipment failure or power outage. • Equipment to assist with evacuation and response in the event of a major incident or disaster. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by FY 2014 Proposition 1 B Safety and Security funds to improve safety and security at all existing and planned Riverside County Metrolink stations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1 B (FY 13/14 Security Funds) $350,000 Total $350, 000 26 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r NM= Earside (ooniy iionsponorim tommission Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 16 - 1 PROJECT NAME: Rail Station Surveillance and Security Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will provide the following: • Enhanced remote video surveillance capabilities to allow security personnel, law enforcement and first responders to better monitor and assess incidents at all stations existing and planned. • Limited and controlled access to stations and platforms in the event of a catastrophic accident or disaster. • Improved lighting and visibility to mitigate the potential of personal injury and criminal activity at the stations. • Battery backup systems to ensure visibility in the event of equipment failure or power outage. • Equipment to assist with evacuation and response in the event of a major incident or disaster. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by FY 2015 Proposition 1 B Safety and Security funds to improve safety and security at all existing and planned Riverside County Metrolink stations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1 B (FY 14/15 Security Funds) $350,000 Total $350, 000 27 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 r `` Riverside (eerily ironspunminn Commission TABLE 6 — STATE TRIENNIAL AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2006/07 — FY 2008/094) Completion Details No findings N/A 4 Triennial performance audit for FY 2006/07 through FY 2008/09 was conducted in FY 2009/10 and completed 8/6/09. 28 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 94/940Z-174/E403 Ad dThS 11V?d 010b 0:3 iirtridr:Err, I, .ir :; io.:3R :.:1 Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2012/13 Short Range Transi t Plan Review RCTC Commuter Rail Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Uniirked Passenger Trips 3,175,076 Passenger Niles 116,803,590 Tokal Actual Vehicle Revenue Train Hours 17,822.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Car Miles 2,896,316.0 Tokal Actual Vehicle Train Miles Tckal Operating Expenses T48,605,000 Tokal Passenger Fare Revenue $21,060,000 Net Operating Expenses $27,545,000 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1, Fare6ox Recovery Ra tio I 43.32%1 >= 40.00% I 39.74%1Fail s to Meet Target Discretionary: 1, Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour T2,727.25 ‹= $3,235,66 $3,261.86 Fails to Meet Target 2, Subsidy Per Passenger $8.68 >= $7.41 and <= $10.03 $9.67 Meets Target 3, Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.24 >= $0.21 and <= $0.29 $0.27 Meeks Targek 4, Subsidy Per Hour $1,S4S.S6 >= $1,S44,6S and <= $2,089.83 $1,96S.S6 Meets Target S. Subsidy Per Mile $9.51 >= T7,79 and <= $10.53 $9.12 Meets Target 6, Passengers Per Revenue Hoer 178.20 >= 177.06 and <= 239,SS 203.30 Meeks Targek 7, Passengers Per Revenue Mile 1.10 >= 0.89 and a= 1.21 0.94 Meets Target 8, Unlirked Passenger Trips 3,175,076 >= 2,212,078 2,019,49S Fails to Meet Target 9, Passenger riles per Rev. Car Miles 40.33 >= 30S2 and ‹= 41.30 33.19 Meeks Targek Notes Mist meet at least 5 out of 9 Discretionary Performance Indicators 'Productivity Performanc a Summary: Service Provider Com men ts: CD 94/940Z-174/E403 Ad dThS 11V?d 010b IiHr,J� icertylwapidim6nrri:m FY 2013/14 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider: RCTC Commuter Rai! All Routes Performance indicators FY 2011/12 end of Year Actual FY 2O12t13 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2013/14 plan FT 2013/ 14 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 3,023,071 2.019,495 3,143,332 n= 2,212,378 Meets Target Passenger Niles 106,656,434 71.058,286 115,155,893 Nme Revenue Hcurs 14.263.0 9,934.0 17,178.0 Nme Tckal Hcurs 1S 960.0 11.049.0 17.178.0 Nme Revenue Miles 2,855,935.0 2,141,074.0 2,703,680.0 Nme Tdal Miles 2,952,538.0 2,234,961.0 2,703,680.0 Nme Cpera king Cost: $45,589,680 132.4433,336 151,702,000 Nme Passenger Revenue $19,786,372 $12,877,455 122,978,000 Nme Cpera king abs dy $25,803,308 $19,525,881 128,724,000 Nme Operating Costs Per Revenue Hou, $3,196.36 $3,261.86 $3,009.78 a=$3,33‘.27 Meets Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile 115.96 $15,13 $19,12 Nme Operating Costs Per Passenger 115.08 $16,05 $16,45 Nme Farebox Recovery Ratio 43.40% 39.74% 44.44% 40.0% Meeks Target absidyPer Passenger $8.54 $9,67 $9,14 =$3.22and <=$11,12 Meets Target Subsidy Per Pasenger Mile $0.24 $0,27 $0,25 n= $0.23 and a= $0.31 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $1,809.11 $1,965.56 $1,672.14 n= $1,67C.73 and ‹_ $2,260.39 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $9.04 $9,12 $10,62 n= V.75 and a= $10,49 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue HOI.r 212.00 203,30 183,00 = 172,81 and <= 233.80 Meeks Target Passengers Per Revenue Vile 1.06 0,94 1.16 0.80 and <= 1,08 Better Than Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard colmn is the result of com wing the FY 2013/14 Plar to the FY 2013/14 Primary Target. r Niarside (ouniy iionspornorion Commission TABLE 9 — SRTP HIGHLIGHTS Specific highlights of the FY 2013/14 Commuter Rail Plans include: O A 5%+ fare increase; O Begin construction of the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension; O $1 million cost increase due to implementation of positive train control; O Potential service increase on 91 Line; and O Support development of Coachella Valley commuter rail facilities. Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data FY 09/10 Audited FY 10/11 Audited FY 11 /12 Audited FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Planned Systemwide Ridership 2,939,587 2,909,872 2,943,200 3,175,076 3,143,332 Operating Costs per Revenue Hour $$2 906 $3,042 $2,558 $2,727 $3,009 31 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2013/14-2015/16 Table of Contents Chapter 1 — System Overview Page 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Description of Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 4 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service 5 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure 6 1.5 Revenue Fleet 7 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities 8 Chapter 2 — Existing Service and Route Performance 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Analysis 8 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance 8 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 9 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts 10 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth 10 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 10 Chapter 3 — Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 Recent Service Changes 10 3.2 Recommended Local & Express Route 11 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion 11 3.4 Budget Impact and Proposed Changes 12 Chapter 4 — Financial and Capital Plans 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 12 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program 14 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 14 Table 1 — Fleet Inventory 16 Table 2 — Service Summary 18 Table 3 — Route Statistics 21 Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions and Area Served 23 Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 24 Table 5.1 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2014/15 27 Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 30 Table 6 — Progress Implementing Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations 32 Table 7 — Service Provider Performance Targets FY 2012/13 33 Table 8 — Performance Report FY 2013/14 34 Table 9 — City of Corona Transit Service Highlights FY 2013/14 35 Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data 35 Table 9B — Fare Revenue Calculation 36 Chapter 1 — System Overview 1.0 Introduction The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) sets the objectives and strategies for fiscal year (FY) 2013/14 for the City of Corona Transit Service (CCTS) by evaluating current transit system performance, projected demographic changes, operating and capital funding needs, anticipated funding from federal, state and local sources and other factors to create a reasonable projection of conditions over the next three years (FY 2013/14 — 2015/16). To address rising costs and uncertain funding, the CCTS reduced service and raised fares on July 5, 2010. As anticipated, ridership continues to be impacted and remains approximately 1 percent below pre -service and fare change (FY 2012/13 year end projection). An increase in students using transit services is partially offsetting ridership lost to service reductions and fare increase. 1.1 Description of Service Area The CCTS operates a general public, demand response Dial -A -Ride (DAR) and fixed route dubbed the `Corona Cruiser.' DAR service commenced in 1977 and provides curb -to -curb service throughout the City of Corona and neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). Door-to-door service is available upon request for riders certified under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Corona Cruiser fixed route began operating in 2001 and serves the city -center as well as commercial, retail and residential areas on the eastern and southern portion of the city. See service maps on the following pages: 1 Vlno3w31 O1 oy avoalroa 3015a3Na 01 4 N 00aON 01 Tin d3SInd3 MOH 3 l Aava3n OS A1Nnoo 30NO1VH0 a31N3J V NOIIV1..VH3a V O103a IOOHOS VNOLOJ NOIH 31tlI03Na31N] H IVAIdSOH d 30I11 @ Natld r IOOHOS 116IN33 NNIl0a1314 3JI110 .0d TOM AlIJ :SNOIIVNI1S34 21Vlfld0d dN3J3l 31,1I1 31118 a35IONJ vN02103 WI 314I1 O. N.M. VNONOJ 33In2135 AO SV.V A.M03 AavaNnos VNONOJ 1011I3 S3111021 lISNVlil N lano oils oo3soo a 3]IJ-V-7W ] MOH 0 1 1 1 1 OONON Ol 1 133211s N LO 1 .•416 1131 3031100 kmempaoo 1 1 onena3a�sd34d—Nv oovox nwo0 l 031.3 .n.s., ,� 3a1a q sn.a d 'S LI mg lIR lIo sO1N3:SNOILVNI1S3O HVlfldOd3OR1-V-lVIO VNONOD 31411 3r,e n3=.11n3 VHOYOJ iiiiMao., 03,. ass.sao.00noa TitgTtIgnri • -WM ON3J3l 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections The CCTS serves an ethnically diverse population of nearly 152,400 residents. The city encompasses 39 square miles. That diversity is reflected in the table below. City Population and Diversity Percent of Population tir- Population and Ethnicity Number Total Population 152,374 100% White 90,925 59.7% Some other race 28,003 18.4% Asian 15,048 9.9% Black or African American 8,934 5.9% Two or more races 7,759 5.1 % American Indian and Alaska Native 1,153 0.8% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 552 0.4% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics, 2010 Census The table below lists rider characteristic for the DAR and Cruiser service. Ridership characteristics estimates are based on data compiled over the first eight months of FY 2012/13. Rider Characteristics Corona Dial -A -Ride Corona Cruiser Senior / Disabled 80.6% General Public 36.3% General Public 13.8% Senior / Disabled 28.3% Metrolink Transfer 3.6% Student 24.3% Attendant (no fare) 1.5% RTA Transfer 5.4% Child 0.5% Child 4.1 Metrolink Transfer 1.6% 4 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service System -wide ridership in FY 2011/12 totaled 215,068. This represents a 2 percent increase from the previous year's ridership of 210,721. Using ridership from the first nine months of FY 2012/13 as a basis for estimating year end ridership, ridership should increase by 6 percent (227,019) over FY 2011/12. Ridership is projected to grow slightly in FY 2013/14 (1 percent). Corona Cruiser — Blue and Red Lines The Blue Line serves the McKinley Street retail area then travels on to Magnolia Avenue and Main Street to the River Road area. This route passes by many trip generators such as hospitals, medical facilities, public service agencies, library, civic center, and commercial/retail areas. This route also serves the unincorporated area of Home Gardens. The Red Line connects the residential areas of central Corona with commercial areas along Sixth Street and the Ontario Avenue/California Avenue retail area. The Red Line also covers South Corona along Ontario Avenue/Temescal Canyon Road to serve the county area of El Cerrito and The Crossings shopping complex at Cajalco Road/Temescal Canyon Road. The Cruiser schedule is: Blue Line Red Line Monday — Friday 6:42 a.m. — 7:09 p.m. 7:00 a.m. — 7:05 p.m. Saturday 8:52 a.m. — 3:50 p.m. 9:07 a.m. — 4:15 p.m. Sunday no service no service The Cruiser does not operate on the following holidays: New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day. Cruiser ridership totaled 153,783 during FY 2011/12. Using ridership from the first nine months of FY 2012/13 as a basis for estimating year end ridership, ridership should increase by 6 percent over FY 2011/12. Ridership is projected to increase slightly in FY 2013/14 (1 percent). This is the third year the Cruiser has serviced the Corona Transit Center, owned and operated by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). The Corona Transit Center provides a safe and efficient transfer point between local and regional bus lines as well as regional commuter trains serving Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Trains are accessible via a pedestrian bridge to the adjacent North Main Corona Metrolink commuter rail station. To incentivize multimodal transportation, valid Metrolink pass -holders ride at no charge on Cruiser Blue and Red Lines to and from the Corona Transit Center. The CCTS and RTA have a reciprocal agreement that allows valid pass -holders a no -cost, one- way transfer between the Cruiser and RTA buses at bus stops served by both Cruiser and RTA routes 1 and 3 buses. Transfers between bus purveyors are an effective way to promote public transit as a low cost, eco-friendly and stress -free alternative to automobile trips. 11��11 �V METROLINK CDR9AIA CRUISER NM i rth areldo Tranth Agony 5 Corona Dial -A -Ride Dial -A -Ride provides service to the general public, seniors, persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for complementary paratransit service under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Reservations can be made from one to fourteen days in advance; however, same day service may be accommodated if space is available. Dial -A -Ride provides curb -to -curb service throughout the City of Corona and neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). Door -to -Door assistance for ADA certified passengers is available upon request. Door-to-door service is available when: • Drivers can see the bus at all times; • The outermost door is within 150 feet from the bus; • Driver safety and security is maintained; and • Where a safe parking area is available. For individuals certified for ADA complementary service, service hours are expanded to match Cruiser hours. Passengers certified under the ADA receive priority service. Voicemail message reservations are accepted for ADA clients on Sundays and Holidays for next day service. The Dial -A -Ride schedule is: ADA Complementary General Public Paratransit Monday — Friday 6:42 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. 6:42 a.m. — 7:09 p.m. Saturday 8:52 a.m. — 4:15 p.m. 8:52 a.m. — 4:15 p.m. Sunday no service no service Dial -A -Ride service does not operate on the following holidays: New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day. Dial -A -Ride ridership totaled 61,285 in FY 2011/12. Using ridership from the first nine months of FY 2012/13 as a basis for estimating year end ridership, ridership should increase by 4 percent over FY 2011/12. Ridership is projected to grow by 2 percent in FY 2013/14. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure The current fare structure appears on the next page. 6 Fare Structure Fare Type Corona Cruiser Cash -General $1.50 Cash-Senior/Disabled/Medicare $0.70 Cash -Child (46" tall or under) $0.25 Day pass -General $4.00 Day pass-Senior/Disabled/Medicare $2.00 15 day pass -General $25.00 $17.50 15 day pass -Student $17.50 $12.25 15 day pass-Senior/Disabled/Medicare $11.50 $8.05 31 day pass -General $50.00 $35.00 31 day pass -Student $35.00 $24.50 31 day pass-Senior/Disabled/Medicare $23.00 $16.10 Dial -A -Ride General $4.00 Senior/Disabled/Medicare $2.50 Child $0.50 Note: Medicare means Medicare Card Holder. Current Fare Structure implemented July 5, 2010. To incentivize the use of public transit as a viable alternative to automobile trips, the CCTS is using Air Quality Management District (AQMD) funds to subsidize multi -day passes (15 day and 31 day passes) on the Cruiser. The use of these funds allows the CCTS to reduce the cost of multi -day passes by 30 percent for Cruiser riders but enables the CCTS to recover an adequate fare. 1.5 Revenue Fleet The CCTS operates a fleet of 16 light and medium -duty transit buses. All CCTS buses are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement for accessibility and wheelchair securement. The Dial -A -Ride fleet consists of 12 buses made up of 10 ElDorado National Aerotech 240s (these buses were placed into service in October 2012, with 4 buses powered with compressed natural gas (CNG) and 6 buses powered with gasoline) and two ElDorado National Aerotech 220s put into service in 2007 are slated for replacement in FY 2013/14. A federal earmark with state matching funds has been allocated to replace these aging buses. All 12 buses can operate in fixed route service. Four medium -size, medium -duty ElDorado National AeroElite buses are used to operate Cruiser service. All four buses are powered with CNG. The City plans on replacing these buses in FY 2013/14. Two additional buses will be procured in FY 2013/14 to increase the spare ratio and address future expansion. 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities The CCTS operates from a newer facility at 735 Corporation Yard Way. Transportation Concepts, the vendor retained to operate transit service, provides administrative and dispatching service from this location as well as fueling and vehicle parking. Maintenance is performed by a third party at an off -site garage. The outcome of a competitive procurement conducted in Spring 2013 will determine the private sector vendor who will operate transit service for the next five years (August 2013 to June 2018). Chapter 2 — Existing Service and Route Performance 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Analysis The CCTS operates the Cruiser along two fixed routes — the Blue Line and Red Line. As anticipated, the service reduction and fare increase negatively impacted ridership. As the immediate impact of a fare increase diminishes, ridership will recover; conversely, ridership lost to the reduction in operation hours may not. Schedules that do not allow for a flexible start/finish time may preclude former patrons from using the Cruiser with a reduced operating day. These riders may not resume riding. Providing trips to and from area schools has softened the impact of a shorter operating day and fare increase. Cruiser ridership has nearly recovered since the 2010 fare and schedule change. The state's continuing budget challenge has forced the Corona -Norco Unified School District to reduce school busing. Fortunately, the Cruiser has been an alternative mode of transportation for some students. Students made up 8 percent of Cruiser riders in FY 2010/11. Students now make up an estimated 24 percent of Cruiser riders. Nonetheless, shorten Cruiser service hours means the bus cannot meet some school's morning bell schedule (e.g., El Cerrito Middle School). Efforts will be made to secure sustainable funding to add back an early morning eastbound Red Line trip. 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance As with the Cruiser, ridership on Dial -A -Ride has nearly recovered from the fare and schedule change of 2010. Early morning and later evening hours were eliminated as a cost saving measure. As such, Dial -A -Ride buses are no longer able to meet the early morning/later evening Metrolink train schedule. As a result, trips to the city's two Metrolink Stations have declined by half. Senior citizens and people with disabilities make-up almost 81 percent of Dial -A -Ride passengers. General public and Metrolink riders make up approximately 17 percent of riders. Due to higher fares ($4 instead of $2.50 for Senior/Disabled riders) general public and Metrolink riders contribute approximately 26 percent of passenger fare revenue. 8 2.3 Key Performance Indicators The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) with fiduciary and administrative oversight of transit operators in Riverside County. Each year, the RCTC reviews and approves the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTPs) and allocates local, state and federal funding. To ensure productivity, the RCTC has developed and monitors eight performance indicators that measure productivity — these indicators and year-to-date performance are listed in the table below. By statute, transit operators serving urban areas must recover a minimum of 20 percent of operating cost through fare revenue. Fare revenue includes passenger fares, interest on investments, advertising revenue, local contributions and the proceeds from the sale of surplus vehicles. A farebox recovery ratio below 20 percent endangers the receipt of local funding. Farebox recovery ratio is a mandatory performance indicator. Transit operators must meet at least four of seven discretionary performance indicators to remain in good standing. Through the first nine months of FY 2012/13, CCTS has met the farebox ratio and six of seven discretionary indicators. These indicators are shown below. Key Performance Indicators Performance Indicators Year -to -Date Performance Mandatory: Farebox Recovery Ratio Discretionary: Operating cost per revenue hour Subsidy per passenger Subsidy per passenger mile Subsidy per hour Subsidy per mile Passengers per revenue hour Passengers per revenue mile 20.9% $66.29 $6.97 $1.64 $52.46 $4.03 7.5 0.58 The target for the operating cost per revenue hour set by RCTC for FY 2012/13 was $64.87. RCTC adjusts this indicator by the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI). The planned cost per revenue hour for transit operations for FY 2012/13 was 69.51, while still exceeding the target, the cost per revenue hour year-to-date of $66.29 is out performing the plan. Fuel and employee benefit costs are two areas where annual increases have grown faster than CPI. Table 7, Service Provider Performance Targets Report shows greater detail on FY 2012/13 performance targets and actual performance by indicator. Table 8, SRTP Performance Report, provides a similar comparison for next year's performance. The Cruiser and Dial -A -Ride service meet the mandated 20 percent farebox recover ratio and six of seven discretionary performance targets. The plan for FY 2013/14 exceeds the target set for Operating Cost per Revenue Hour. The target is adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) which is based on cost increases for indexed consumer goods between FY 2010/11 and FY 9 2011/12. The CPI inflator is 2.22 percent. The increase in operating cost for such items as employee benefits and fuel exceeds the CPI inflator and contribute to pushing the cost per revenue hour over the target increase of 2.22 percent. 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts The 2010 fare and schedule change has had a positive impact on productivity. The fare change has increased revenues and assisted the CCTS meet the mandatory farebox recovery ratio. During FY 2009/10, the CCTS recovered 13.7 percent of operating costs through fares collected from passengers. Passenger fares are projected to recover 17.2 percent of operating costs in FY 2013/14. (Interest on Investments, bus shelter advertising revenues and a contribution from the City's General Fund make up the difference.) Passengers per hour have increased 28 percent from 9.0 passengers per hour in FY 2009/10 to 11.6 on the Cruiser during the first nine months of FY 2012/13. DAR productivity remains stable at 4.0 passengers per revenue hour in FY 2009/10 to 4.0 during FY 2012/13. A continued effort to increase passengers per hour on Corona Cruiser and Dial -A -Ride service is an on -going goal. 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Major trip destinations within the city are the commercial/retail areas along McKinley Street and Sixth Street, The Crossings shopping area on Cajalco Road and Temescal Canyon, medical facilities along Magnolia Avenue, regional transit facilities off Main Street, the Corona Public Library, Senior Center and civic center. Many Dial -A -Ride passengers use the service to get to work and care centers, doctor visits and Corona's two Metrolink Stations. Cruiser patrons use the service for work, shopping trips, making stops at pharmacies and grocery stores, and accessing restaurants and movie theaters. 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs The CCTS continues to upgrade existing bus stops and add new ones to improve the convenience of riding buses for our patrons. Two bus stops along RTA's route 1 bus line will undergo upgrades to afford bus riders using mobility devices to access the stops. In response to requests, two stops will be added to Cruisers routes. Improvements in bus stop amenities create a more inviting environment that may encourage and attract new riders to the Corona Cruiser system. New shelters will be installed throughout the Cruiser service area and along both the Blue and Red Lines. In the spring of 2012, the CCTS purchased 26 bus shelters, benches and trash baskets. Site improvements to accommodate shelters and their installation is planned to be completed in June 2013. Chapter 3 — Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 Recent Service Changes To fill the gap between revenues and expenses, the CCTS implemented a fare increase to boost revenues and a service reduction to lower costs in July 2010. Trimming the least productive hours was a reasonable starting place. Early morning and later evening hours were less productive than mid -day hours. The service change eliminated the least productive weekday and Saturday hours. However, some productive Saturday afternoon hours were eliminated to balance revenue and expenses. Aligning Dial -A -Ride service hours with Cruiser hours also helped reduce operating costs. 10 By statute, the CCTS must recover at least 20 percent of operating costs in farebox revenue to maintain state funding. When farebox revenues do not meet the required 20 percent requirement, the City of Corona's General Fund makes up the difference. Restoring some service may be considered when the City's General Fund becomes capable of sustaining additional funding to meet the required 20 percent recovery ratio (between operating cost and farebox revenue) to accommodate the additional cost of Saturday service. CCTS staff wants to ensure that any increase in service is sustainable over the next several years. The CCTS will continue to look to a private sector firm to operate transit services, as opposed to City employees operating transit services, as the most cost efficient way to provide bus service. The CCTS is currently out -to -bid for contract transit services. The cost to provide transit service over the next five-year contract is a large factor in the City's ability to restore service lost in 2010. If sustainable revenue can be identified and favorable costs to operate transit service is obtained through the current competitive procurement process, adding back some early morning Cruiser service to better align the bus schedule with school schedules may address demand and would provide an option to students using more costly Dial -A -Ride service. Adding back some formerly productive Saturday afternoon service would be a second area where CCTS staff would recommend restoring service. 3.2 Recommended Local & Express Route Modifications CCTS staff is looking at redeploying an under -performing weekday afternoon Cruiser trip to a school tripper to address overcrowding. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion Increasing ridership is another way to augment passenger fares. The CCTS staff is looking at strategies to increase Cruiser ridership. These marketing strategies include: o Videos promoting public transportation — in cooperation with RTA's Northwest T-NOW Chapter, CCTS staff organized a video contest. Videos will be presented to community groups to inform citizens about the various transit options available in the Northwest region of Riverside County and encourage their use. o Bus Shelter Program — the CCTS has installed new shelters at 23 Corona Cruiser bus stops. Shelters provide bus patrons with relief from the sun during hot days and protection from rain during inclement weather. These shelters feature seating for six, an area for a mobility device/wheelchair, and solar -powered dusk -to -dawn security lighting. These new shelters act as a destination for bus passengers and as an ambassador as to how public transit can beautify a neighborhood and itself function as marketing tool inviting motorist to try public transit. o Smart Phone Applications — CCTS staff is working with a software consultant to provide links to smart phone applications that provide Corona Cruiser bus route and schedule information. o Poetry on the Bus Program — in cooperation with Centennial High, Corona High and Lee Pollard High, CCTS conducted its fourth successful poetry contest inviting students to submit original poetry to be displayed on the interior of Cruiser buses. Selected poems are rotated each month. The program works as an outreach effort and marketing campaign at high schools while providing a creative outlet for students. Cruiser patrons are rewarded with expressive, introspective and entertaining poems to read and ponder during their time on the bus. o Art on the Bus Program — replicates the Poetry on the Bus Program but broadens it to include student artwork. This program has completed three annual cycles and incorporates artwork from high school students. 11 o Distribute promotional items and route/schedule information at community events. o Providing travel training clinics at the Corona Senior Center and other community -based centers and housing developments. 3.4 Budget Impact and Proposed Changes While progress has been made, recovery from the "Great Recession" has been slow. The CCTS relies on a contribution from the City's general fund to meet the mandatory farebox recovery ratio (mandate to recover 20 percent of operating costs through fare revenue). However, the City's general fund continues to reflect a sluggish regional economy. As such, the CCTS is stretching funding to meet anticipated strong demand for DAR service by adding approximately 1,700 vehicle revenue hours (VRH) (12 percent) in FY 2013/14. This increase is partially offset by a reduction in budgeted Cruiser hours of 465 VRH (3 percent). This is not a service reduction, but merely an adjustment in budgeted hours to better reflect actual VRH scheduled in FY 2013/14. Chapter 4 — Financial and Capital Plans 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget To continue to provide Corona Cruiser fixed route and Dial -A -Ride service, the CCTS is proposing a balanced budget of $2.1 million for FY 2013/14, representing 5 percent increase over the current year budget. Increases in salary and benefit costs (8% or $27,230) and additional DAR VRHs (13% or $90,103) are largely driving the increase in costs. These increases are partially offset by cost reductions in the Materials, Marketing and Utilities category. In addition, the overall cost to provide contracted transit service is estimated to increase 2 percent in FY 2013/14. The current contract for transportation services ends June 2013. While CCTS staff is hoping for competitive pricing in the next five-year contract, only when bids are received will the true cost of contracted transit service be known. Please see Budget by Item and Mode on the proceeding page: 12 Budget by Item and Mode Budget Item Mode FY 2012/ 13 �Tp FY 2013/ 14 Plan Variance $ % Salades & Benefits Dia I -A -Rd e Cruiser aibtotal 179,518 193,289 180,754 13,771 8% 194,213 13,459 7% 360,272 387,502 27,230 8% Materials, Marketing and Utilities Dia I -A -Rd e 32,323 32,811 488 2% Cruiser 37,962 31,924 (6,038) -16% aibtotal 70,285 64,735 (5,550) -8% Fuel Dia I -A -Fad e 133,060 138,082 5,022 4% Cruiser 84,670 87,210 2,540 3% Su b t o t a I 217,730 225,292 7,562 3% Contracted Transit Service Dia I -A -Rd e 672,123 762,226 90,103 13% Cruiser 681,523 668,891 (12, 632) -2% Sibtotal 1,353,646 1,431,118 77,472 6% Total Dia l-A-Rde 1,017,024 1,126,408 109,384 11% Cruiser 984,909 982,239 (2,670) 0% Total $2,001,933 $2,108,646 $106,713 5% 13 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program The CCTS is proposing a funding plan that includes state funding (Local Transportation Fund) to support 80 percent of operating costs. The remaining 20 percent will be generated by passenger fares, bus shelter advertising and local funds. The CCTS plans on purchasing six buses, a new communication system and improvement bus stop accessibility in FY 2013/14. Funding to cover this capital purchase consists of State Transit Assistance, Proposition 1 B/Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement & Service Enhancement Program and Prop 1B/California Transit Security Grant Program funding. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Half Fare During Non -Peak Hours According to federal statute, transit operators must allow 1) elderly persons, 2) persons with disabilities, and 3) Medicare cardholders to ride fixed route service during off-peak hours for a fare that is not more than one-half the base fare charged to other persons during peak hours. The base fare for Cruiser service is $1.50 during peak and non -peak hours. The fare for an elderly person (60+), a person with disabilities and Medicare cardholders is $0.70 throughout the service day. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The ADA requires that complementary paratransit service be available to ADA certified persons during the same hours and days of operation available to Cruiser (fixed route) passengers. Complementary paratransit service must be provided within % of a mile of a fixed route. The CCTS operates a general population Dial -A -Ride that extends beyond the % mile corridor to the city limits, into the county areas of Coronita, El Cerritos and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). When demand exceeds capacity, requests for service from ADA certified passengers receive priority. As such, the CCTS maintains zero denials for ADA certified passengers. Provision of Service - ADA complementary paratransit must be provided to an ADA eligible individual, including those with temporary eligibility, a personal care attendant (PCA) if necessary, and one other individual accompanying the ADA-eligible individual, if requested. Additional companions may be provided service, if space is available. Service also must be provided to visitors. Any visitor who presents ADA eligibility documentation from another jurisdiction must be provided service. Type of Service — The ADA specifies `origin to destination" service. In certain instances, this might require service beyond strict curb -to -curb. Door -to -Door assistance for ADA certified passengers is available upon request. Door-to-door service is available when: • Drivers can see the bus at all times; • The outermost door is within 150 feet from the bus; • Driver safety and security is maintained; and • Where a safe parking area is available. Fares — The ADA complementary paratransit fare cannot exceed twice the fare for a trip of similar length, at a similar time of day, on the Cruiser (fixed route system). No fares maybe charged for Personal Care Attendants (PCAs). ADA certified individuals are charged $2.50 per trip which is less than twice the fare for a trip on the Cruiser ($1.50 x 2 = $3.00). 14 Title VI In compliance with the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no person on the basis of race, color, or national origin, is excluded from participation in, or is denied the benefits of, or is subjected to discrimination within the scope of services offered by the CCTS. Notification to passengers of their right to file a complaint is included on the City of Corona website and service brochures. Transportation Development Act Triennial Audit The CCTS underwent a Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Performance Audit in March 2010 covering fiscal years 2006/07 through 2008/09. Audit results suggest a continuing efficient operation meeting the major goals and objectives of the TDA program. Room for improvement is always paramount with the audit suggesting more scrutiny of performance data and continuity between National Transit Database and TransTrack/performance-based reporting. The CCTS will be meeting with auditors during the summer 2013 to review performance data for the triennial period of FY 2009/10 through FY 2011/12. Federal Transit Administration Triennial Review The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) conducted a Triennial Review of fiscal years 2007/08 through 2009/10 in August 2011. Four of five corrective actions were closed out in five days. These actions ranged from including combining all federal funded equipment into a single list to adding language regarding door-to-door assistance to the City's web page and brochure to adding the term "Medicare Card Holder" to the fare structure on promotional materials. The fifth item, a maintenance monitoring plan, was submitted for FTA approval. National Transit Database The National Transit Database (NTD) approved CCTS' request to submit transit financial and performance data through a Small Systems Waiver starting in report year 2011; the waiver is available to transit providers operating 30 or fewer buses. (CCTS currently operates 16 buses.) The NTD closed out the annual report in February 2013. Alternative Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policy) The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) encourages all Riverside County transit operators to transition from diesel -powered transit buses to alternative fuel buses. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) are recognized as preferred options. The CCTS currently runs a mixed fleet of gasoline and CNG-powered buses. Ten new Dial -A - Ride buses replaced aging buses in September and October 2012. As planned, four of these buses are powered with Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). While gasoline is a recognized alternative fuel for demand response/Dial-A-Ride buses, the CCTS integrated CNG-powered Dial -A -Ride buses with funding through the federal government's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) program. The CCTS anticipates replacing its Cruiser buses in FY 2013/14. Each bus will remain CNG-powered. 15 42:D [vuir l rzpzinim{nrtrmsim Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan City of Corona Year Built Mfg. Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active # of Vehicles Contingency FY Vehicles 2012/13 FY 2012/13 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2006 EDN AeroElite 30 4 33 CN 4 0 712,481 792,367 198,092 Totals: 30 4 4 0 712,481 792,367 198,092 TransTrack Manager'"' Page 1 of 2 5/1/2013 42:1) [vuir l rzpzinim{nrtrmsirn Demand Response / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan City of Corona Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2012/13 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2012/13 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2007 2012 2012 EDN EDN EDN AeroTech AEROTECH AEROTECH 18 20 20 2 6 4 26 26 26 GA GA CN 2 6 4 0 0 0 334,965 375,015 108,371 58,696 187,508 18,062 14,674 Totals: 58 12 12 0 334,965 542,082 45,174 TransTrack Manager'"' Page 2 of 2 5/1/2013 CM' �EM= iiNr.'d� forrq l.oapzinim{normsicn Table 2 -- City of Corona -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 11 14 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,849,629 $1,926,752 $2,001,936 $1,498,793 $2,108,646 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $371,492 $389,351 $400,388 $312,705 $421,730 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,478,137 $1,537,401 $1,601,548 $1,186,088 $1,686,916 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 210,721 215,068 213,700 170,264 229,929 Passenger Miles 893,263 913,777 900,891 722,956 954,083 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 28,526.8 28,748.2 28,800.0 22,610.9 30,028.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 364,347.0 374,232.0 378,308.0 294,021.0 393,503.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 401,454.0 408,999.0 412,953.0 321,921.0 430,809.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $64.84 $67.02 $69.51 $66.29 $70.22 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.08% 20.21% 20.00% 20.86% 20.00% Subsidy per Passenger $7.01 $7.15 $7.49 $6.97 $7.34 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.65 $1.68 $1.78 $1.64 $1.77 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $51.82 $53.48 $55.61 $52.46 $56.18 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.06 $4.11 $4.23 $4.03 $4.29 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.58 0.57 0.56 0.58 0.58 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' siinon Page 1 of I iiNr.'d� forrq l.oapzinim(normsicn Table 2 -- Corona -BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 4 5 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $907,827 $952,248 $984,464 $700,496 $982,238 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $182,526 $193,186 $196,894 $153,046 $196,448 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $725,301 $759,062 $787,570 $547,451 $785,790 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 152,568 153,783 154,000 122,230 164,603 Passenger Miles 600,753 605,514 600,600 481,345 625,492 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 14,225.0 14,218.0 14,500.0 10,506.3 14,035.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 167,939.0 167,690.0 174,676.0 124,174.0 165,856.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 179,439.0 179,552.0 187,003.0 132,885.0 177,491.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $63.82 $66.98 $67.89 $66.67 $69.98 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.11% 20.29% 20.00% 21.85% 20.00% Subsidy per Passenger $4.75 $4.94 $5.11 $4.48 $4.77 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.21 $1.25 $1.31 $1.14 $1.26 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $50.99 $53.39 $54.32 $52.11 $55.99 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.32 $4.53 $4.51 $4.41 $4.74 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 10.7 10.8 10.6 11.6 11.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.98 0.99 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' siinon Page 1 of I iiNr.'d� forrq 1.aapzinim(normsicn Table 2 -- Corona-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 I Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 7 9 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $941,801 $974,503 $1,017,472 $798,296 $1,126,408 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $188,965 $196,164 $203,494 $159,659 $225,282 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $752,836 $778,339 $813,978 $638,637 $901,126 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 58,153 61,285 59,700 48,034 65,326 Passenger Miles 292,510 308,264 300,291 241,611 328,591 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 14,301.8 14,530.2 14,300.0 12,104.6 15,993.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 196,408.0 206,542.0 203,632.0 169,847.0 227,647.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 222,015.0 229,447.0 225,950.0 189,036.0 253,318.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $65.85 $67.07 $71.15 $65.95 $70.43 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.06% 20.13% 19.99% 20.00% 20.00% Subsidy per Passenger $12.95 $12.70 $13.63 $13.30 $13.79 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.57 $2.52 $2.71 $2.64 $2.74 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $52.64 $53.57 $56.92 $52.76 $56.35 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.83 $3.77 $4.00 $3.76 $3.96 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.1 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.29 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' siinon Page 1 of I 42:1) .1.0 EM= iiNr.'d� [curt 1.Erzpzinim{nvvmsicn Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Corona -- 3 FY 2013/14 All Routes Peak Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy COR-BLUE COR-DAR COR-RED Total Total Total 2 9 3 87,131 65,326 77,472 331,097 328,591 294,395 7,028.0 15,993.0 7,007.0 7,296.0 18,004.0 7,322.0 84,811.0 227,647.0 81,045.0 88,800.0 253,318.0 88,691.0 $491,622 $1,126,408 $490,616 $98,324 $225,282 $98,124 $393,298 $901,126 $392,492 Service Provider Totals 14 229,929 954,083 30,028.0 32,622.0 393,503.0 430,809.0 $2,108,646 $421,730 $1,686,916 TransTrack Manager'"' 4/26/2013 Page 1 of 2 42:1) .1.0 EM= iiNr.'d� [curt 1.Erzpzinim{nvvmsicn Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Corona -- 3 FY 2013/14 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile COR-BLUE COR-DAR COR-RED Total Total Total $69.95 $70.43 $70.02 $5.80 $4.95 $6.05 $5.64 $17.24 $6.33 19.99% 20.00% 20.00% $4.51 $13.79 $5.07 $1.19 $2.74 $1.33 $55.96 $56.35 $56.01 $4.64 $3.96 $4.84 12.4 4.1 11.1 1.03 0.29 0.96 Service Provider Totals $70.22 $5.36 $9.17 20.00% $7.34 $1.77 $56.18 $4.29 7.7 0.58 TransTrack Manager'"' 4/26/2013 Page 2 of 2 Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions and Area Serviced Line Route Description Area / Site Served Cruiser Red Line The Crossings shopping area at Cajalco Road and Temescal Canyon to the El Tapatio at West Sixth Street via downtown / Civic Center The Crossings shopping area, Taber Park and Ride, California Avenue Post Office, Centennial High, Corona Transit Center/North Main Corona Metrolink Station, City Library, Senior Center, Civic Center, Corona High and El Tapatio on west Sixth Street Blue Line Wal-Mart at McKinley Street west to River Run Apartments via Mountain Gate Park and downtown / Civic Center McKinley Street shopping areas, Magnolia Avenue, Centennial High, medical facilities, Senior Center, City Library, Corona Transit Center/North Main Corona Metrolink Station, Fender museum, north Main Street shopping area and restaurants Dial -A -Ride City-wide Demand response / reservation based service City-wide, neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the city of Norco - Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Riverside Community College/Norco Campus 23 Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 City of Corona Project Description Project No. Total Funds LTF STA Prop 1B Security CTSGP Prop 1B Capital PTMISEA Section 5307 - Riverside/San Bernardino UZA Fare Box* Other ** FY 14 - Operating Revenues 2,108,646 1,686,917 - - 347,840 73,890 Subtotal: Operating $2,108,646 $1,686,917 - - - - $347,840 $73,890 FY 14 - Purchase Four Replacement Heavy- FY 14 - 1 970,442 970,442 Duty/Low Floor Buses (FY 10/11 funds) FY 14 - Purchase Two (1-replacement; 1 expansion) Medium-Duty/Cutaway Buses FY 14 - 2 243,283 243,283 FY 14 - Purchase Land -Mobile Communication FY 14 3 77,650 77,650 System (FY 10/11 and 11/12 funds) FY 14 - Bus Stop Improvement/ADA FY 14 - 4 50,000 50,000 Accessibility Subtotal: Capital $1,341,375 - $293,283 $77,650 $970,442 - - - Total: Operating & Capital $3,450,021 $1,686,917 $293,283 $77,650 $970,442 - $347,840 $73,890 * Includes AB 2766 congestion and emission reduction funds to incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes ($12,300) ** Operating - Other revenues include bus shelter advertising ($14,700) and City contribution ($59,190). Table 4 — Capital Project Justification Number: FY 14 - 1 Title: Purchase Heavy -Duty / Low Floor Buses Description: This request provides funds to purchase heavy-duty, low -floor transit buses to be used in Corona Cruiser Fixed Route service. The City plans to purchase four (4) purpose-built CNG powered buses. Justification: With the reduction in school busing the Corona Cruiser is experiencing peak trip challenges with overcrowding on Red and Blue Line buses. Larger buses with additional seating and standing capacity, as well as additional weight bearing capacity, will help address current capacity and vehicle constraints. Funding Sources: Prop 1 B / PTMISEA* (FY 10/11) $970,442 State Transit Assistance (prior year allocation) $700,000 Insurance Proceeds (prior year settlement/damaged bus) $51,000 STA (reprogramed prior year funds) $46,879 Prop 1 B / CTSGP** (remaining interest and FY 09/10) $28,022 Prop 1 B / PTMISEA (remaining interest) $3,678 Total $1,800,021 "PTMISEA — Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account "CTSGP — California Transit Security Grant Program Number: FY 14 - 2 Title: Purchase Medium -Duty / Cutaway Buses Description: This request provides funding to purchase medium -duty cutaway transit buses for Corona Cruiser Fixed Route service. The City plans to purchase two (2) CNG-powered buses. to increase the spare ratio and accommodate anticipated growth in the city's service area. Justification: The City operates five (5) buses in peak Corona Cruiser service. At present, there are four buses dedicated to Cruiser service; a dual -mode Dial -A -Ride bus is needed to cover peak service and instances when Corona Cruiser buses are out -of -service for repairs and routine maintenance. The purchase of these two buses will address peak demand and as spare buses. Funding Sources: State Transit Assistance (FY 13/14) $243,283 State Transit Assistance (reprogrammed prior year funds) $80,821 Prop 1 B / CTSGP (FY 09/10) $5,896 Total $330,000 25 Number: FY 14 - 3 Title: Purchase Land -Mobile Communication System Description: This project provides funds to replace the existing 2-way radio system with a state-of-the-art, inter -operable capable (communications with/between other first responders/other agencies) radio system. The project will replace radio equipment installed on -board all buses (mobile -based) and replace the land - based transmitter/receiver located on Grape Hill. The project will also upgrade radio equipment/microphones used by dispatch staff. All radio equipment will be digital and inter -operable and narrow -band capable. Justification: Communication between dispatch/management staff and bus drivers promotes the efficient use of transit resources and assets. A reliable radio system is important for safety and security and extends the reach of supervision and management into the field. Funding Sources: Prop 1 B / CTSGP (FY 10/11) $38,827 Prop 1 B / CTSGP (FY 11/12) $38,823 Total $77,650 Number: FY 14 - 4 Title: Bus Stop Improvements & ADA Accessibility Description: The Corona Cruiser fixed route service approximately 185 bus stops along two routes — the Red and Blue Lines. This project will provide funding to improve ADA accessibility, maintain stop furniture and equipment in proper and safe manner and provide funding to place additional stops as demand warrants. This project is a multi-year/on-going activity. Justification: Either installing new accessible bus stops or upgrading existing stops to improve accessibility and/or removing barriers to accessibility ensures all bus patrons have equal access to Corona Cruiser service. Project funding will enable the City to maintain benches, signs, kiosks and shelters in proper and safe condition. Funding Source: State Transit Assistance (FY 13/14) $50,000 26 Ta ble 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2014/ 15 City of Corona Project Description Project No. I Total Funds OF STA Prop 1B Security C IS[,P Prop 1BCapital PTMISEA Section 5307- Riverside/San Bernardino UZA Fare Box* I Other** FY 15 - Operating Revenues 2,193,003 1,754,394 361,754 76,856 Subtotal: Operating $2,193,003 $1,754,394 - - - - $361,754 $76,856 15-1 Purchase Computer -Aided Reservation and Dispatch System FY15-Bus Stop Improvement/ADA Accessibility FY 15 - Bus Stop Fabrication, Ste Improvement and Installation FY15-1 FY15-2 FY 15 - 3 600,000 50,000 600,000 382,503 50,000 600,000 217,497 Subtotal: Capital $1,250,000 ' - $1,032,503 - 217,497 - - - Total: Operating&Capital $3,443,003 $1,754,394 $1,032,503 - 217,497.00 - $361,754 $76,856 * IncludesAB2766 congestion and emission reduction fundsto incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes($12,792). **Other revenues inc lude busshelter advertising ($15,288) and City contribution ($61,568). Table 5.1 — Capital Project Justification Number: FY 15 - 1 Title: Purchase Computer -Aided Reservation and Dispatch System Description: The City's Dial -A -Ride service provides approximately 300 demand -response passenger trips per day. Reservation -takers received calls throughout the day from patrons inquiring about available pick-up/drop-off times. Reservation -takers book reservation requests as well as develop trip manifest for drivers to follow in - route from pick-ups and drop-offs. Reservation -takers use the system to dispatch drivers and monitor on -time performance and manage same -day trip requests. The system must be capable of sending text message and manifests from dispatching staff to mobile data terminals on -board buses. The system must be reliable and be capable of reporting performance statistics and provide management with a tool to monitor contractor performance and compliance. Justification: The City purchased the existing system in 2006. The system has not met the performance expectations of either contractor or transit staff. In FY 2012/13, the City upgraded the system to the latest software version. Not only did the upgrade take longer and involve more staff time resources than anticipated, the system continues to underperform. Transit staffs needs a reliable system that not only facilitates reservation -taking and dispatching but needs a system with adequate reporting capabilities that can enhance performance monitoring and contractor compliance. Funding Sources: State Transit Assistance (FY 14/15) $382,503 Prop 1 B / PTMISEA (FY 09/10) $217,497 Total $600,000 Number: FY 15 - 2 Title: Bus Stop Improvements & ADA Accessibility Description: The Corona Cruiser fixed route service approximately 185 bus stops along two routes — the Red and Blue Lines. This project will provide funding to improve ADA accessibility, maintain stop furniture and equipment in proper and safe manner and provide funding to place additional stops as demand warrants. This project is a multi-year/on-going activity. Justification: Either installing new accessible bus stops or upgrading existing stops to improve accessibility and/or removing barriers to accessibility ensures all bus patrons have equal access to Corona Cruiser service. Project funding will enable the City to maintain benches, signs, kiosks and shelters in proper and safe condition. Funding Source: State Transit Assistance (FY 14/15) $50,000 28 Number: FY 15 — 3 Title: Bus Stop Shelter Fabrication, Site Improvements and Installation Description: Bus stop shelters provide patrons with shelter during inclement weather and shaded respite from the sun. Shelters also provided lighting for convenience and enhanced passenger safety. Bus shelter advertising contributes to the CCTS' farebox recovery requirement which helps offset the cost of Corona Cruiser fixed route service. Justification: The CCTS' existing shelters that accommodate advertisement have reached their service life and need replacement. Replacement shelters will maintain the current revenue stream as well as improve bus stop esthetics and provide solar - powered, dusk -to -dawn security lighting. Funding Source: State Transit Assistance (FY 14/15) $600,000 29 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/ 16 City of Corona Project Description Project No. Total Funds LTF STA Prop 1B security CTSGP Prop 1BCapital pTMIgA Section 5307- Riverside/&in Bernardino UZA Fare Box* Other** FY 16 - Operating Revenues 2,280,723 1,824,569 376,224 79,930 t Subtotal: Operating $2,280,723 $1,824,569 - - - - $376,224 $79,930 FY 16 - Bus Stop Improvement/ADA Accessibility FY 16 - 1 50,000 50,000 Subtotal: Capital $50,000 - $50,000 I - - I - - - Total: Operating &Capital $2,330,723 $1,824,5691 $50,000 - - - $376,224 $79,930 * IncludesAB2766 congestion and emission reduction fundsto incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes($13,304). **Other revenues include busshelter advertising ($15,900) and City contribution ($64,031). Table 5.2 — Capital Project Justification Number: FY 16 - 1 Title: Bus Stop Improvements & ADA Accessibility Description: The Corona Cruiser fixed route service approximately 185 bus stops along two routes — the Red and Blue Lines. This project will provide funding to improve ADA accessibility, maintain stop furniture and equipment in proper and safe manner and provide funding to place additional stops as demand warrants. This project is a multi-year/on-going activity. Justification: Either installing new accessible bus stops or upgrading existing stops to improve accessibility and/or removing barriers to accessibility ensures all bus patrons have equal access to Corona Cruiser service. Project funding will enable the City to maintain benches, signs, kiosks and shelters in proper and safe condition. Funding Source: State Transit Assistance (FY 15/16) $50,000 31 Table 6 — Progress Implementing Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations Audit Recommendation Action / Remedy Work with the contract operator to electronically submit the monthly performance report that is compatible with the City computer system (carry-over FY 2003/04-2005/06 audit). Change in contract operator is the next best opportunity to define and implement electronic submission of transit performance data. Contract expires in June 2013. Closer monitoring of performance reporting by contractor (FY 2006/07-2008/09 audit). On -going. Ensure National Transit Database and TransTrack performance data ties (FY 2006/07-2008/09 audit). On -going. 32 42:1) .1.0 EM= [viit I rzpzinim{nvvmsicn Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Corona Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 213,700 Passenger Miles 900,891 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 28,800.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 378,308.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 412,953.0 Total Operating Expenses $2,001,936 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $400,388 Net Operating Expenses $1,601,548 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 20.00% I >= 20.00% I 20.86% I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $69.51 <= $64.87 $66.29 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $7.49 >= $5.76 and <= $7.80 $6.97 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $1.78 >= $1.36 and <= $1.84 $1.64 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $55.61 >= $43.10 and <= $58.31 $52.46 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.23 >= $3.32 and <= $4.49 $4.03 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 7.40 >= 6.38 and <= 8.63 7.50 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.56 >= 0.48 and <= 0.66 0.58 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2013 Page 1 of I iier.'d� is n-"1.i apziriim{airrrinicn FY 2013/14 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; City of Corona All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2011/12 End of Year Actual FY 2012/13 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2013/14 Plan FY 2013/14 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 215,068 170,264 229,929 None Passenger Miles 913,777 722,956 954,083 None Revenue Hours 28,748.2 22,610.9 30,028.0 None Total Hours 30,969.8 24,374.6 32,622.0 None Revenue Miles 374,232.0 294,021.0 393,503.0 None Total Miles 408,999.0 321,921.0 430,809.0 None Operating Costs $1,926,752 $1,498,793 $2,108,646 None Passenger Revenue $389,351 $312,705 $421,730 None Operating Subsidy $1,537,401 $1,186,088 $1,686,916 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $67.02 $66.29 $70.22 <= $67.76 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $5.15 $5.10 $5.36 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $8.96 $8.80 $9.17 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.21% 20.86% 20.000/0 >= 20.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $7.15 $6.97 $7.34 >= $5.92 and <= $8.02 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $1.68 $1.64 $1.77 >= $1.39 and <= $1.89 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $53.48 $52.46 $56.18 >= $44.59 and <= $60.33 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $4.11 $4.03 $4.29 >= $3.43 and <= $4.63 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 7.50 7.50 7.70 >= 6.38 and <= 8.63 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.57 0.58 0.58 >= 0.49 and <= 0.67 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2013/14 Plan to the FY 2013/14 Primary Target. TransTrack Manager"' 5/13/2013 Page 1 of 1 Table 9 — CCTS Highlights FY 2013/14 Operations o To ensure a least -cost operation, the City of Corona provides transit service by contracting with a private section company. In June 2013, the existing contract expires. CCTS staff will put together bid documents, conduct a competitive bid process and select the best qualified and most responsible and responsive company to continue to provide CCTS patrons with safe, reliable and responsive transit service. o Continue to work with the Corona Norco Unified School District to identify times and locations where the Corona Cruiser can transport students commuting between home and school if state funding for school busing is further constrained. o Promote alternative modes of transportation by improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Identify new sidewalk and in -fill needs as well as expanding the bicycle route network. Pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements make these modes of transportation a viable option to automobiles and improves access to public transportation. o Continue to survey bus stops for Americans with Disabilities Act compliance. Capital Projects o Purchase five replacement and one expansion Corona Cruiser buses. o Purchase and install a new land -mobile based communication system. o Implement phase one of a multi -year effort to enhance accessibility of Corona Cruiser bus stops. Table 9A Performance Fiscal Year Measures 2009/10 Actual 2010/11 Actual 2011/12 Actual 2012/13 Estimated 2013/14 Planned System -wide Ridership 229,793 210,721 215,068 227,019 229,929 Cost per Revenue Hour $58.65 $64.84 $67.02 $66.29 $70.22 35 Table 9B - Fare (consistent with Commission Revenue Calculation Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2011/12 Audit FY 12/13 (Estimate) FY 13/14 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares $321,032 $355,056 $335,400 2.Interest $13,338 $0 $0 3. General Fund Supplement $29,500 $41,492 $59,190 4. Measure A $0 $0 $0 5. Advertising Revenue $6,985 $11,000 $14,700 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets $591 $0 $0 7. CNG Revenue $0 $0 $0 8.Lease/ Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund $0 $0 $0 10. Investment Income $0 $0 $0 11. CalPers CERBT $0 $0 $0 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes $0 $0 $0 Other Revenues I.13. $17,905 $12,288 $12,300 TOTAL REVENUE $389,351 $419,836 $421,590 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $1,926,753 $2,018,344 $2,108,646 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 20% 21% 20% 36 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY BLYTHE, CALIFORNIA p r flfRER1 ROADRIJNO M61.1L 415 Y America the 8eeuli�ei...SweEl * *4- * ^'�! DESER.. Ord or utti SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 - 2015/16 DRAFT JUNE 12, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1— System Overview Page Service Area 4 Demographics 4 Service Profile 4 System Map 5 Fare Schedule 6 Fleet & Maintenance 7 Chapter 2 — Services & Performance Blue Route 1 Blythe City Circulator 9 Gold Route 2 Palo Verde College Crosstown 10 Red Route 3 CA Prisons Express 11 Green Route 4 Rural Rider 12 Silver Route 5 Saturday Service 13 Desert Road TRIP 14 Blythe Mobility Management 15 PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride 16 Performance 17 Growth and Planning 18 Chapter 3 — Service Changes Route Changes and Modifications Promotions Chapter 4 — Finances & Capital Plans 20 21 Operating Budget 23 Capital Budget 23 Compliance Requirements 23 Data Tables (Start) 24 2 Chapter 1— System Overview 3 Service Area Geographically, the Palo Verde Valley is located approximately 170 miles east of Riverside along Interstate 10 at the Colorado River. The service area is primarily based within the City of Blythe, and the unincorporated Riverside County areas of Mesa Verde and Ripley. Also part of the greater area is the California State Prison facilities of Ironwood and Chuckawalla, approximately 20 miles west of the valley along Interstate 10. Demographics The valley's population is approximately 25,000 residents. Population growth in the valley is increasing at an average of about 2% per year. The valley is agriculturally diverse providing many outdoor jobs and direct support to the local community. Major employers include the California State Prisons Ironwood and Chuckawalla. Service Profile The PVVTA provides many transit options to serve senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and the general public. PVVTA services are known to the general public under the marketing name "Desert Roadrunner". PVVTA provides four deviated fixed routes in the Palo Verde Valley which serve Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde, Palo Verde College, California Department of Corrections facilities and limited service to Ehrenberg, Arizona. ADA Para -transit is also provided after hours on the Fixed Routes through route deviation requests. The routes can deviate up to 3/4 of a mile away from the actual mapped routes. Hours of operation for the Fixed Route system are: Monday -Friday from 5:00 am to 6:10 pm and 8:00 am to 3:00 pm on Saturday and limited holidays. Finally, Desert RoadTRIP provides transportation reimbursement to individuals unable to access PVVTA Fixed Route services. The PVVTA's transit services are contracted with Transportation Concepts of Irvine, California. Transportation Concepts has been providing transit service for PVVTA since October of 2003. PVVTA also has an agreement with the Independent Living Partnership to administer the Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project (Desert RoadTRIP) that has been in place since 1995. 4 AVM .]1E11SN'tfH3 dViAl IARLSAS V1AAd O rn T 2 3C1d3AVS3W 39.3110a 301:13A 01b'd 3nN314'izir 449 Trifas o11QN Fare Schedule PVVTA's fare structure is sensitive to the local economy while attempting to maintain the mandated 10% Farebox Recovery Ratio. The schedule includes full fare and discounted ride tickets. PVVTA implemented a modest fare increase on July 1, 2010. In fiscal year 2014/15, staff may propose a base increase to the fare structure in order to maintain the Farebox Recovery Ratio. Prior to any proposed increases, PVVTA would hold a public hearing in order to receive public input on any change to the Fare Schedule. PVVTA Fare & Pass Schedule Fixed Route Cash Fare — Routes 1, 2, 4, 5 General Public Seniors Persons with Disabilities Children ages 5 and under* Children ages 5 and under* (ages 5-59 years old) (ages 60 years or older) (with ADA Card) (first boarding with full fare adult) (second & third boarding with full fare adult) * Free for the first (1) child, $0.80 for child 2 & 3 boarding with a fare paying adult; Full Fare all other accompanying children. $1.65 $0.80 $0.80 Free $0.80 for Arizona Zone Fare for travel to and from Ehrenberg, AZ General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities $5.00 Fixed Route Cash Fare — Route 3 Express General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities Route Deviations (one way to or from route) Route Deviations — All Fixed Routes Route Deviations (one way to or from route) DV8 Card (8 one way deviation fares)*** ***Not valid for initial passenger fare, only for payment of route deviation fee. Fixed Route Go Passes 10-Ride Punch Pass S/D 10-Ride Punch Pass General Public 31-Day Pass Seniors 31-Day Pass Persons with Disabilities 10-Ride Punch Pass 10-Ride Punch Pass 20-Ride Punch Pass General Public 31-Day Pass (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Ehrenberg, AZ) (Route 3 Express) (Route 3 Express) (Route 3 Express) $3.30 $0.80 $0.80 $6.40 $16.50 $ 8.00 $43.00 $28.00 $28.00 $50.00 $ 33.00 $ 66.00 $120.00 Other Cash Fare — X-Tend-A-Ride General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities $5.00 6 Fleet and Maintenance PVVTA operates vehicles using Compressed Natural Gas, gasoline and diesel. The fleet consists of 6 active transit vehicles and 3 active support vehicles. Most of the vehicles are interchangeable between routes. When vehicles are retired, they are declared surplus property and sold at a city auction. PVVTA adheres to all Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and California Highway Patrol (CHP) mandated Preventive Maintenance Inspection criteria and is very proactive in maintenance efforts. Vehicle maintenance is provided under contract with the City of Blythe Central Garage. Emergency Reserve Fleet As PVVTA adds new vehicles into service, older units are rotated into an emergency contingency fleet that would be implemented only as needed for emergency and public safety use. With extreme heat conditions and remote location in the Palo Verde Valley, a reserve fleet would better prepare the community in times of power outages where these vehicles would be used to transport affected residents to cooling centers within the area. For other emergency events such as floods or the breakdown of larger passenger buses on Interstate 10 this fleet would be able to assist with a large movement of passengers to safety freeing up local law enforcement to better deal with the situation at hand. Land of the Free... Home of the Brave! DESERT ROADRUNNER pw+a.com 7 Chapter 2 — Services & Performance 8 Blue Route 1— Deviated Fixed Route City of Blythe Circulator Blue Route 1 serves the growing community of Blythe providing riders access to many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices within the City of Blythe. Destinations on Blue Route 1 include: Blythe City Hall, Big Kmart, All Star Cinemas, Albertsons, Rite Aid, Palo Verde Hospital, Palo Verde Unified School District schools, Employment Development Department, Department of Motor Vehicles, Post Office, Blythe Central Garage and Public Works Department, California Highway Patrol, Senior Nutrition Program, Palo Verde Valley District Library, and various other shopping locations within the community. The route can deviate for passengers up to 3/4 of mile with a 30 minute in advance reservation or upon boarding. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and Social Security (SSA) Transfer Center. Blue Route 1 operates deviated service in a clockwise loop type of route providing a 60 minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Blue Route 1 operates from 7:30 am to 6:00 pm Monday -Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency observed holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 Make minor changes in frequency to unproductive areas; staff will continue to monitor service. 2015 Analyze the feasibility of increasing frequency of headways, continue to monitor service. 2016 Implement an opposite bus on the same route in 30-minute headways during peak hours. �i1 PVHS 10th Ave N. BROADWAY j KMART CD 0 Chanslorway B. rnard ul ccsiul E CIVIC -, a ii 7th. BALDW I N T r.,(= . 14th Ave Hobsonway v ces a--+ c ENCINAS 9 Gold Route 2 — Deviated Fixed Route Palo Verde College Crosstown Gold Route 2 provides riders access between the City of Blythe and Palo Verde College. This feeder route provides connections to many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices, Blythe City Hall, All Star Cinemas, Big Kmart, Albertsons, Rite Aid, Palo Verde Hospital, Colorado River Fair, Employment Development Department, Blythe Recreation Center, Palo Verde Valley District Library, Palo Verde College Spring Street Campus, Palo Verde College main campus and various other shopping locations within the community. The route can deviate for passengers up to 3/4 of mile with a 30 minute in advance reservation or upon boarding. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and other major trip generators. Gold Route 2 operates on a two way route providing a 60 minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Gold Route 2 operates from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm Monday -Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency observed holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 Add a subscription only augmented service to address late night trip issues from the Palo Verde College. 2015 Implement any finding from 2013 analysis of late night trip issues from the Palo Verde College. 2016 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 6th Ave PV College c .ro v L Riverside Barnard c KMART ° 2 Murphy L't INTAKE Hobsonway CIVIC 7th 10 Red Route 3 — Deviated Fixed Route CA Prisons Express The Red Route 3 provides premium commuter service between Blythe and Chuckawalla Valley & Ironwood State Prisons, Monday through Friday with three AM and three PM trips. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive then travels via Interstate 10 to the prisons. The Red Route 3 operates from 5:00 am to 7:30 am and again from 2:00 pm to 5:30 pm, Monday -Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency or State observed holidays. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and Social Security (SSA) Transfer Center Special fares are charged on this route. All passengers pay $3.30 one way. There is 10 and 20 ride GoPasses available as well as a $120.00, 31-Day GoPass which gives unlimited rides on all Desert Roadrunner buses for the month. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 Possibly expand route service and schedule depending on availability of JARC Grant Funds. 2015 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2016 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. I40 MESA SR-78 17A PRISONS PNR co KMART 2 4- likobsonway 11 Green Route 4 — Deviated Fixed Route Rural Rider The Green Route 4 provides deviated fixed route service between Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde and Ehrenberg AZ. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to State Route 78 then travels South to Ripley, West to Mesa Verde via Interstate 10 and services Ehrenberg AZ. The Green Route 4 operates three round trips 7:00 am to 4:00 pm Monday — Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency or State observed holidays. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and other major trip generators. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 Analyze the feasibility of increasing frequency, and continue to monitor service. 2015 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. 2016 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. MESA SR-78 KMART 00 Hobsonway MARINA v) RIPLEY RIVIERA 7th EHRENBERG 12 Silver Route 5 — Deviated Fixed Route Saturday Service The Silver Route 5 provides system -wide deviated fixed route service within the City of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Az. This route serves all major trip generating areas within the system on 90-minute headways. The Silver Route 5 operates 8:00 am to 3:00 pm Saturday and Agency observed holiday operating days. Services are not provided on the following days: Monday — Friday and all Agency observed non -operating holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service under exemption. 2015 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service under exemption. 2016 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service under exemption. fIEA IC -MART ISR-78 RIPLEY 1_ f1ansli=Jrtvay 4:i 1S{:trVtiVaY S. BROADWAY EHRENBER 13 Desert Road TRIP Trip Reimbursement PVVTA's Desert RoadTRIP program currently provides reimbursement to individuals who do not have access to local transportation. Desert RoadTRIP will be marketed and promoted in conjunction with Independent Living Partnership to seniors (age 60 years or older), persons with disabilities and truly needy persons who live outside the service area, such as Lost Lake, resort communities along U.S. Highway 95 and Desert Center. Desert RoadTRIP participants can travel up to 460 miles a month, including using Greyhound (690 miles for a family). This equals $147.20 per month ($220.80 for a family per month). In Fiscal Year 2011/12, the TRIP program provided 21 valley residents with mileage reimbursement support for 310 one-way trips and 44,177 miles of escort assisted transportation to distant medical services for a total service cost of $9,252. This breaks down to a per one-way trip cost of $29.85 and a 20.9 cents per mile subsidy. In Fiscal Year 2010/11, a minimal fare of $5 per roundtrip was added for the Desert RoadTrip service. The fare was added to help maintain and meet the farebox requirement of 10% for the TRIP program, but after analyzing the TRIP program, it was determined that the program was still not meeting the required Farebox requirement, therefore, the Board approved implementing the $5 fare per one-way trip making that $10 per round trip. This change became effective in March 2012 and since the implementation of the fare change, the TRIP program has met the farebox requirement. Volunteer drivers will continue to be recruited in order to guarantee that Desert RoadTRIP users have escort transportation. PVVTA is also a partner in the Volunteer Driver Corps program. Desert RoadTRIP is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2015 Bring the service in house utilizing grant funding opportunities. 2016 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 14 Blythe Mobility Management Project JARC / New Freedom PVVTA/Blythe Mobility Management is an innovative approach for managing and delivering coordinated transportation services to customers, including older adults, people with disabilities, and individuals with lower incomes. In 2008, the Agency received funding from the FTA New Freedom and Job Access Reverse Commute grants as a direct result of needs identified in the RCTC Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan. Mobility Management in essence is a one -stop shop to coordinate transportation service and information with human services needs. Together, Caltrans and PVVTA are working on extending the ongoing one-year agreement to the projected three-year plan first identified by the Agency through the RCTC Public Transit Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan completed in 2012. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 Services will be reduced and focused on Senior and Persons with Disabilities as required by New Freedom funding. 2015 No proposed changes this fiscal year; look for outside funding to sustain mobility management program beyond Federal funding cycles. 15 PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride Community -Based Service Link PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride is a demand responsive service to address special areas in time where community events require general public transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system. Events in the evening, on no service days, and beyond fixed route hours would be the primary focus of this new service. X-Tend-A-Ride will provide curb -to -curb service with an exclusive fare targeted to meet farebox performance requirements. During a pre -planned community event riders would be directed to fixed route service during regular operating hours then X-Tend-A-Ride would be available to provide service beyond regular operating hours. Similar trail service has been utilized for Sober Driver needs, added service to the local fair and special community events needing public awareness. PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride will not operate in place of fixed route services. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2014 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2015 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2016 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 16 Performance In FY 2011/12 PVVTA implemented major route changes system -wide. From those route changes, several enhancements and very few issues have developed. Services are now timed and revolve around a central hub location at the K-Mart Transfer Center making travel system -wide seamless and easy for most transit dependent riders. Issues have risen from extended routing to outlying areas where trips are very unproductive in ridership. Over the holiday month of December, ridership systematically increases due to additional service placed on the fixed routes for holiday decoration viewing and services to community events over the season. This time of year is a double edged sword as the Palo Verde College extended winter break and rolled out the spring class session over many more weeks than in the past. This resulted in very poor ridership in the month of January primarily on the Green Route 4 and Gold Route 2 which directly services the Palo Verde College. Route 2 has regained strong ridership but may face the same ridership downfall over the summer months of FY 2013/14 due to a plan by the Palo Verde College to extend the summer recess an extra month in light of a college budget shortfall. Green Route 4, an exempt service, started off with promising ridership in FY 2011/12 but over the first year of exemption the route has had flat ridership numbers and has fallen into a negative performance trend. Key trip generators and demographics of the areas served by Route 4 show many riders have moved closer to the City of Blythe or have moved to the Coachella Valley to pursue better job opportunities and more affordable housing. Service on this route currently will be reduced in line with the demand for service. Staff as always continues to monitor and promote services in the Unincorporated Areas of Riverside County. To streamline service to the Palo Verde College Route 4 will now take over routing from the Route 2 servicing Ehrenberg AZ. This service is promising as PVVTA is now in process of receiving money from Western Arizona Council of Governments (WACOG) for trips provided to Arizona residents. 17 Growth and Planning PVVTA looks to partner with new national chain businesses who are now located within the service area to expand passenger amenities and incentive programs for riders. PVVTA through local and regional permitting review has implemented several proposed improvements to the system including rerouting of services to new trip generators, addition of new bus stop amenities and anticipated demand to new trip generating anchors in East Blythe spawning future planning for services along the Colorado River corridor. This growth of major shopping and eating areas in the east end of the service area was predicted and planned for FY 2007/08. Since the economic downturn planning for services have slowed down but PVVTA is ready and has had plans to address such growth. Another area of interest continues to be the solar projects just west and south of the Palo Verde Valley. Transportation is a major key in balancing traffic flow and intrusion on several desert areas. With a minor increase of short -time workers and more permanent jobs once the solar fields are built, public transit will need to bridge the gap between the Palo Verde Valley, Desert Center, Chiriaco Summit and the Coachella Valley. PVVTA hopes that sometime soon Sunline and RCTC will look to partner to meet this growing need. PVVTA is now part of the Western Arizona call for projects in hopes of funding existing service provided in Ehrenberg AZ. WACOG is very interested in partnering with PVVTA and other regional Arizona operators to bridge the gaps in service between remote communities such as Quartzsite, Parker, Yuma and Blythe. It is hopeful that PVVTA will start to receive 5310 funds for service to low-income seniors and person with disabilities in the Ehrenberg area. This area is within one air mile of the California border and residents utilize almost 90% of all needed services in Blythe California. PVVTA provides shopping, medical and education based trips to those in Ehrenberg. Any new funding would offset the current cost of operation. 18 Chapter 3 — Service Changes 19 Route Changes and Modifications Blue Route 1 continued to be routed by the Baldwin Senior Apartments and Casa Encinas every other scheduled hour. Gold Route 2 routing will exclude Ehrenberg AZ focusing on consistent hourly service to Palo Verde College. Red Route 3 will continue multiple roundtrips to the California State Prisons. Green Route 4 will now service Ehrenberg AZ and the existing routing in Mesa Verde and Ripley 3 times a day on weekdays. Silver Route 5 will continue weekend/holiday service and have routing to all major weekend trip generators system -wide. •r 20 Promotions The following marketing efforts will be utilized to promote ridership growth in FY 2013/14. 1. Continuation of the marketing program which includes brochures, flyers, advertisements in local newspapers, community transit fairs, participation in community events, and promotional materials. 2. Continuation of public outreach program, which includes meetings with schools, employers, senior service programs, persons with disabilities programs, social service agencies, the general public, city departments and other organizations that benefit from public transportation in the Palo Verde Valley. 3. Continuing the Mobility Training program to teach the public about public transportation, including those with disabilities. 4. Continue to offer information on Rideshare programs available to residents and visitors of the Palo Verde Valley. 5. Foster new partnerships with LaPaz County, Palo Verde College Association of Student Governments and new businesses coming to the City through the Shop, Save and Get Home Free Program. 21 Chapter 4 — Financial & Capital Plans Operating Budget The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency's operating budget for fiscal year 2013/14 is $913,416 which is only 3% higher than last year's operating budget. The increase is minimal and primarily due to a slight increase in the cost of operations and maintenance. The Agency's budget includes only those expenses for the day to day operations of the Transit Agency and those expenses associated with the New Freedom grant. Expenses will be monitored closely to assure that the Agency continues to operate within its budget and is compliant with the mandatory 10% farebox recovery ratio. Included in the FY 2013/14 budget again this year is the Mobility Management Program. Capital Budget The Agency's capital budget for FY 2013/14 is $350,568 which includes funding for bulk purchases of bus tires and filters for the Agency's fleet which will allow quicker repair of the buses with the supplies already on hand. Capital funds will also be used for the purchase of bus stop amenities, and heavy duty tools that are critical for the maintenance of the Transit fleet. The Agency has applied for Prop 1B funds this fiscal year which will be used to purchase remote site surveillance equipment, and will also be applying for JARC grant funds to purchase two (2) alternative fueled CNG buses which will be utilized on the Express Red Route 3. At this time PVVTA is not requesting additional funding for two projects that have already been funded and are moving forward with construction. Those projects are the CNG Fueling Facility and the New Transit Office. PVVTA may need to request additional funding for construction of the New Transit Office should the bids come in over budget. We anticipate a small shortfall but do not have an amount as of yet. Regulatory and Compliance Requirements PVVTA adheres to all regulatory and compliance requirements as mandated by Riverside County Transportation Commission and or other regulatory agencies, as it pertains to ADA, DBE, EEO, etc. A Triennial Audit was performed for the period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009 in which there were no recommendations for improvement made by the auditor. Pursuant to the audit performed, PVVTA disclosed that the Agency was operating in an efficient and effective manner There were no specific issues identified that needed improvement. The Agency will be undergoing another Triennial Audit this year for the period of July 2009 through June 30, 2012. 23 Table Z - Fleetlnventoty FY2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length Fuel Type Code # of Active # of Vehicles Contingency FY Vehicles 2012/13 FY 2012/13 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2012 2002 2006 2003 2001 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2009 2009 CMD EDN EDN FRC FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD ZZZ ZZZ 4 22 16 28 15 5 18 18 18 5 26 26 26 26 26 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 GA DF GA DF GA GA GA GA CN GA CN CN CN CN CN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 350,441 258,071 212,069 146,724 42,471 15,372 68,384 10,473 136,146 135,915 9,005 356,896 265,343 213,091 147,644 50,750 45,136 107,510 33,682 3,623 0 0 0 152,477 155,322 9,005 50,750 45,136 107,510 33,682 3,623 0 0 0 152,477 155,322 Totals: 279 11 11 4 1,376,066 1,540,479 140,044 TransTrack Manager"" Page 1 of 1 5/7/2013 i;versilecrog uoospstdi® tee Table 2 -- Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet CharacteristicsLLit Peak -Hour Fleet 6 7 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $723,718 $430,044 $885,799 $567,110 $913,416 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $81,798 $99,613 $105,770 $72,684 $100,610 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $641,920 $330,431 $780,029 $494,426 $812,806 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 37,117 41,945 44,459 33,015 45,794 Passenger Miles 336,651 461,395 483,606 363,165 641,116 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 8,551.0 8,926.0 11,028.0 6,585.0 9,701.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 154,348.0 179,971.0 185,481.0 131,430.0 179,363.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 187,533.0 221,824.0 227,869.0 161,961.0 222,220.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $84.64 $48.18 $80.32 $86.12 $94.16 Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.30% 23.16% 11.94% 12.82% 11.01% Subsidy per Passenger $17.29 $7.88 $17.54 $14.98 $17.75 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.91 $0.72 $1.61 $1.36 $1.27 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $75.07 $37.02 $70.73 $75.08 $83.79 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.16 $1.84 $4.21 $3.76 $4.53 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.3 4.7 4.0 5.0 4.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. N TransTrack Manager"' 5/28/2013 Page 1 of 1 MOM Iixrslotoady 1:®pafdim tummam Table 2 -- Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 3 3 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $23,263 $184,619 $390,858 $254,182 $423,147 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $5,140 $39,725 $45,677 $33,909 $47,609 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $18,123 $144,894 $345,181 $220,273 $375,538 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,930 18,066 19,481 14,746 20,453 Passenger Miles 17,505 198,726 268,328 162,206 286,342 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 273.0 3,938.0 5,288.0 2,897.0 4,372.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 6,248.0 98,246.0 102,455.0 71,020.0 95,061.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 6,332.0 102,274.0 106,676.0 73,938.0 98,986.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $85.21 $46.88 $73.91 $87.74 $96.79 Farebox Recovery Ratio 22.09% 21.52% 11.68% 13.34% 11.25% Subsidy per Passenger $9.39 $8.02 $17.72 $14.94 $18.36 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.04 $0.73 $1.29 $1.36 $1.31 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $66.38 $36.79 $65.28 $76.04 $85.90 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.90 $1.47 $3.37 $3.10 $3.95 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 7.1 4.6 3.7 5.1 4.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.31 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.22 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/28/2013 Page 1 of 1 MU- iin rsdr imcy 1 m p!dim iumeesial Table 2 -- Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes P FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 3 4 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $700,455 $245,425 $494,941 $312,928 $490,269 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $76,658 $59,888 $60,093 $38,775 $53,001 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $623,797 $185,537 $434,848 $274,152 $437,268 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 35,187 23,879 24,978 18,269 25,341 Passenger Miles 319,146 262,669 215,278 200,959 354,774 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 8,278.0 4,988.0 5,740.0 3,688.0 5,329.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 148,100.0 81,725.0 83,026.0 60,410.0 84,302.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 181,201.0 119,550.0 121,193.0 88,023.0 123,234.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $84.62 $49.20 $86.23 $84.85 $92.00 Farebox Recovery Ratio 10.940/0 24.40% 12.14% 12.39% 10.81% Subsidy per Passenger $17.73 $7.77 $17.41 $15.01 $17.26 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.95 $0.71 $2.02 $1.36 $1.23 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $75.36 $37.20 $75.76 $74.34 $82.05 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.21 $2.27 $5.24 $4.54 $5.19 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.3 4.8 4.4 5.0 4.8 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.24 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.30 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/28/2013 Page 1 of 1 Table 2 -- PWTA-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 6 6 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $723,718 $420,696 $815,192 $560,051 $881,206 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $81,798 $98,913 $95,160 $71,684 $99,185 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $641,920 $321,783 $720,032 $488,367 $782,021 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 37,117 41,945 44,459 33,015 45,794 Passenger Miles 336,651 461,395 483,606 363,165 641,116 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 8,551.0 8,926.0 11,028.0 6,585.0 9,701.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 154,348.0 179,971.0 185,481.0 131,430.0 179,363.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 187,533.0 221,824.0 227,869.0 161,961.0 222,220.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $84.64 $47.13 $73.92 $85.05 $90.84 Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.300/0 23.51% 11.67% 12.80% 11.25% Subsidy per Passenger $17.29 $7.67 $16.20 $14.79 $17.08 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.91 $0.70 $1.49 $1.34 $1.22 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $75.07 $36.05 $65.29 $74.16 $80.61 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.16 $1.79 $3.88 $3.72 $4.36 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.3 4.7 4.0 5.0 4.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. !V CO TransTrack Manager"' 5/28/2013 Page 1 of 1 r• IMIND - ENridaCarty u®fin® Giniffitsien Table 2 -- PWTA-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 3 3 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $23,263 $184,619 $390,858 $247,123 $423,147 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $5,140 $39,725 $45,677 $32,909 $47,609 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $18,123 $144,894 $345,181 $214,215 $375,538 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,930 18,066 19,481 14,746 20,453 Passenger Miles 17,505 198,726 268,328 162,206 286,342 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 273.0 3,938.0 5,288.0 2,897.0 4,372.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 6,248.0 98,246.0 102,455.0 71,020.0 95,061.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 6,332.0 102,274.0 106,676.0 73,938.0 98,986.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $85.21 $46.88 $73.91 $85.30 $96.79 Farebox Recovery Ratio 22.09% 21.52% 11.68% 13.32% 11.25% Subsidy per Passenger $9.39 $8.02 $17.72 $14.53 $18.36 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.04 $0.73 $1.29 $1.32 $1.31 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $66.38 $36.79 $65.28 $73.94 $85.90 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.90 $1.47 $3.37 $3.02 $3.95 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 7.1 4.6 3.7 5.1 4.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.31 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.22 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Managee" 5/28/2013 Page 1 of 1 rVN�lefaray Incepa`idiro fc°oisiu, Table 2 -- PWTA-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 3 3 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $700,455 $236,077 $424,334 $312,928 $458,059 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $76,658 $59,188 $49,483 $38,775 $51,576 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $623,797 $176,889 $374,851 $274,152 $406,483 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 35,187 23,879 24,978 18,269 25,341 Passenger Miles 319,146 262,669 215,278 200,959 354,774 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 8,278.0 4,988.0 5,740.0 3,688.0 5,329.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 148,100.0 81,725.0 83,026.0 60,410.0 84,302.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 181,201.0 119,550.0 121,193.0 88,023.0 123,234.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $84.62 $47.33 $73.93 $84.85 $85.96 Farebox Recovery Ratio 10.940/0 25.07% 11.66% 12.39% 11.25% Subsidy per Passenger $17.73 $7.41 $15.01 $15.01 $16.04 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.95 $0.67 $1.74 $1.36 $1.15 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $75.36 $35.46 $65.31 $74.34 $76.28 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.21 $2.16 $4.51 $4.54 $4.82 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.3 4.8 4.4 5.0 4.8 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.24 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.30 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. w 0 TransTrack Manager"' 5/28/2013 Page 1 of I PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2013/14 - 2015/16 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 2A - Excluded Routes Route # Mode (FR/DR) Service Type (DO/CO) Route Description Date of Implementation Exemption End Date Gold Route 2 FR CO Provides riders access between the City of Blythe, Palo Verde College & selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. Monday through Friday service. 7/1/2011 6/30/2014 Green Route 4 FR CO Provides deviated fixed route service between Blythe, Ripley & Mesa Verde, Monday through Friday. 7/1/2011 6/30/2014 Silver Route 5 FR CO Provides system -wide deviated fixed route service within the City of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde & selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. Saturday service only. 7/1/2011 6/30/2014 Note: Excluded routes are new routes or new service extensions that are eligible for exemption from the farebox recovery requirements. 31 Z.10 T aged EGav5 „„ia6eueW veasueil 908'ZI8$ OT9'OOT$ 9Tb'£T6$ O'OZZ'ZZZ O'£9£'6LI 0782'1T O'IOL% 9II'I69 66L'S17 L slimy aapinoad 83uuas S8L'OE$ SZb'T$ OTZ'Z£$ I AepiaaM aV4-V1AAd 9£6'£Z$ 9L6'Z$ ZT6'9Z$ O'ZLO'6 0'096'8 O'£61, O'LSb OZ6'LT 08Z'T I AepanieS S-V1Md 51,17'603 988'EI$ IE£'£ZI$ 0'880'9£ O'LET'SE 01 ES'Z 0'6TVT ZZL'1,9 EZO, T AepiaaM b-V1AAd 1,8L'56I$ 96L'17Z$ 08S'OZZ$ 0'9EI'58 0'99L'96 O'ZFVE 0186£'Z ZZ8'ILT £LZ'ZI Z AemaaM E-V1AAd LST'az$ LbL'0£$ 606'ZLZ$ 0'9ZWES 01,96'IS 0'9ES'Z 0'96VZ OOL'EOZ OSSIg T AeplaaM Z-ViMd 669'01a 08L'9Z$ 6LVL£Z$ 0'860'8£ 0'9£S'L£ 0'086'Z O'T£6'Z ZS6'ZST 890'£T T AepaaM T-V1Md Appgns iaN anuanali isoa sapW sal!W sanop mop aa6uassed 6uReaad0 anuanaa moy anuanaa aa6uassed saa6uassed sal3igaA 'lead adAy Aea # ainoa s;uawan eiea sa;nob Iltl bi/£i0Z Jld S -- Aoua5v 4lsueay AalleA apaaA oled sa!ls,ReIS a711021 d IS - £ 9/9e1 m: %muHeJ®q.y�aµuo� mow MN 0l0b riot a6ed m m £IOUZLS ,,,,Ja6eue{y ve{Lsueu 9Z'0 L'b £S'b$ 6L'ES$ LZ'T$ SL'LI$ %SOTS 56'61$ 60'S$ 91166$ mewl lapinoad a3yuas ST'0 8'Z £87$ 8£'ZS$ 68'T$ OL'83 £T'0 £'£ TT'£$ ET'LL$ 69'T$ L9'£Z$ 9Z'0 T'S 6117$ 1,918$ VT'I$ S6'ST$ 8Z'0 8'S TL'b$ ZO'L6$ 611$ 69'93 S£'0 S'b T9'S$ 6816 ST'T$ ZI'9T$ %Zb'b *maw ava-tl1And %SO'TT £01Z$ ST'E$ 68'8S$ Aep roes S-V1AAd %SZ'TT 89'9Z$ SS'£$ I6'98$ AeppaM b-tl1AAd "/017Z'T1 L6'LI$ ZL'b$ 86'16$ AeppaM £-V1AAd %9Z'II 9L'81$ Of 'SS 1,£'60T$ Aep paM Z-tl1AAd %LZ'TI LT13I$ ££'9$ Ma Aep;aaM I-V1AAd al!W aad anop aad al!W anoq 913W Ja6uassed owl! aaWassed anuanaa anop anuanaa adAyAed # a;nob saa6uassed saa6uassed anuanaa anuanaa aa6uessed aad Appgng Aaanoaaa Jed;soa aad4s0D aad;soa aad Apisgng lad Apisgns aad Apisgns xogaaed 6uaeaadp 6upeaadp sao;eaipul aauewaolaad sa;nob py tT /£TOZ Jld S -- AouaBv }isueal Aajjen apaap oled SO/Men ali/Oki dC»S - £ a/gel TABLE 3-A INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS LINE ROUTE DESCRIPTION AREAS/SITES SERVICED FIXED ROUTE: Blue Route 1 Provides riders access to many civic locations within the City of Blythe. Blue Route 1 operates deviated service in a clockwise loop type of route providing a 60 minute frequency with one bus five days a week. Blue Route 1 operates from 7:30 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. Destinations on Blue Route 1 include: City Hall, Big K-Mart, Palo Verde Hospital, Employment Development Department, Palo Verde Unified School District, California Highway Patrol, DMV, Albertsons, Rite -Aid, Senior Nutrition Program, etc. Gold Route 2 Red Route 3 Provides riders access between the City of Blythe & Palo Verde College and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. Gold Route 2 operates on a two way route providing a 60 minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Gold Route 1 operates from 7:00 am to 6:10 pm Monday through Friday. Provides premium commuter service between City of Blythe and the California State Prisons. Red Route 3 serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive then travels via 1-10 to the prisons. This route operates Monday through Friday from 5:00 am to 7:30 am & 2:00 pm to 5:30 pm. Destinations on Gold Route 2 include: Blythe City Hall, Big K-Mart, Albertsons, Colorado River Fair, Blythe Recreation Center, Palo Verde Hospital, Palo Verde Valley District Library, Employment Development Department, etc. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive, then travels to the State Prisons, via Interstate 10. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe at two major transfer points. Green Route 4 Green Route 4 provides deviated fixed route service between Blythe, Ripley and Mesa Verde. This route operates five round trips from 7:00 am to 4:00 pm, Monday through Friday. This route will service four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to SR78 then South to Ripley and West to Mesa Verde via 1-10. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe at two major transfer points. Silver Route 5 This is a new route that will provide system -wide deviated fixed route service within the City of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. This route serves all major trip generating areas within the system on 90-minute headways. This route will service the City of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona and will operate on Saturdays only. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency Short Range Transit Plan Fiscal Year 2013/14 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2013/14 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Capital Prop 1B Homeland Secutity Section 5316 JARC Section 5317 New Freedom Fare Box Other (2) Operating Assistance $ 913,416 $790,596 $22,210 $ 89,385 $ 11,225 Subtotal: Operating $913,416 $790,596 $0 $0 $22,210 $89,385 $11,225 Bulk Vehicle Tires/Filters FY14-1 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 A/C Machine FY14-2 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 Remote Site Surveillance FY14-3 $ 19,569 $ 19,569 Prop 1 B FY 12/13 Bus Stop Amenities FY14-4 $ 10,000 $10,000 Digital Scan Tool FY14-5 $ 7,000 $7,000 Red Route 3 Express Buses (2) FY14-6 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Subtotal: Capital $350,569 $0 $31,000 $0 $19,569 $ 300,000 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $1,263,985 $790,596 $31,000 $0 $19,569 $300,000 $22,210 $89,385 $11,225 (1) Number should tie to Table 4A - Capital Project Justification (2) Please identify source of "Other" funds. Other Funds Include: T.R.I.P. Revenue $ -1,425 Newspaper Revenue $ 700 Advertising Revenue $ 1,500 Charter Service Revenue $ 1,000 Qjvlisc. Revenues/Interest $ 6,600 $ 11,225 Revised 5/21/2013 Summary of FY 2013/14 Funds Requested.xls Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY14-1 PROJECT NAME: Bulk Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase in bulk, tires, filters, etc. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the vehicles with the supplies already on hand. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $8,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 36 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY14-2 PROJECT NAME: A/C Machine PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase A/C machine to service all transit fleet air conditioning units. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) The purchase of the A/C machine will allow the central garage mechanic to service all air conditioning units for transit vehicles and buses. It will also be used to extract Freon from the air conditioning units when they need to be repaired or need recharging after being repaired. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $6,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 37 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY14-3 PROJECT NAME: Remote Site Surveillance Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase and install up to 6 remote access site specific surveillance cameras. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) This project will consist of purchasing and installing up to 6 remote access site specific surveillance cameras that would be able to record and be monitored by transit and local law enforcement agencies to detect and detour crime and other malicious traffic or criminal activity that would hinder the safe normal operation of transit and public safety assets within the City of Blythe. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $19,569 Prop 1 B Homeland Security Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance Remote Site Surv. _ $21,368 Remote Site Surv. $21,728 38 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY14-4 PROJECT NAME: Bus Stop Amenities PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase bus benches to be placed at bus stops throughout the Palo Verde Valley. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) This project has been an ongoing project. The Agency would like to continue with the placement of bus shelters and benches at our bus stop locations. These amenities will provide passenger comfort while waiting for the transit bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $10,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 39 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY14-5 PROJECT NAME: Digital Scan Tool PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase a digital scan tool to aid in the diagnostics of transit buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) The digital scan tool will aid in diagnosing drivability and engine diagnostic codes for both light duty and medium duty transit buses. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $7,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 40 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY14-6 PROJECT NAME: Red Route Expansion Buses (2) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Expansion buses (2) for the Red Route 3 Express PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) Through the Public Transportation -Human Services Coordination Plan it was identified through participant testimony that the increase of capac'ty and expansion of service to the California Correctional Facilities (Chuck: walla and Ironwood) near Blythe and Palo Verde Valley would provide a o reater opportunity for potentially new and existing employees to utilize i.ublic transportation in efforts to offset rising fuel prices and auto expenses while providing greater capacity for growth needs in employment at the 'risons and industry near the Blythe Airport. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $300,000 JARC Grant Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT OT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTCiS CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 41 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2014/15 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2014/15 Project Description Capital Project Number (t) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Capital Section 5316 JARC Section 5317 New Freedom Fare Box Other (2) Operating Assistance FY14 $ 941,561 $ 814,314 $22,210 $92,046 $12,991 Subtotal: Operating $941,561 $814,314 $0 $0 $22,210 $92,046 $12,991 Bus Stop Amenities Bulk Vehicle Tires/Filters FY 15-1 FY 15-2 $ 30,000 $ 10,000 $ 30,000 $ 10,000 Subtotal: Capital $40,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital I $981,561 $814,314 $40,000 $0 $0 $22,210 $92,046 $12,991 (1) Number should tie to Table 5.1 A - Capital Project Justification (2) Please identify source of "Other" funds. Other Funds Include: T.R.I.P. Revenue Newspaper Revenue Advertising Revenue Charter Service Revenue 4PMisc. Revenues/Interest $ 1,468 $ 725 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,798 $ 12,991 Revised 5/21/2013 Summary of Funds Requested FY 2014/15.xls Table 5.1— Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY15-1 PROJECT NAME: Bus Stop Amenities PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase bus shelters to be placed at bus stops where needed throughout the Palo Verde Valley. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) This project has been an ongoing project. The Agency would like to continue with the placement of bus shelters and benches at our bus stop locations. These amenities will provide passenger comfort while waiting for the transit bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $30,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 43 Table 5.1— Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY15-2 PROJECT NAME: Bulk Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase in bulk, tires, filters, etc. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the vehicles with the supplies already on hand. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $10,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 44 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2015/16 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Capital Prop 1 B Homeland Security Section 5316 JARC Section 5317 New Freedom Fare Box Other (2) Operating Assistance FY16 $ 945,615 $ 838,743 $94,807 $12,064 Subtotal: Operating $945,615 $838,743 $0 $0 $0 $94,807 $12,064 Bus Stop Amenities Bulk Vehicle Tires/Filters FY 16-1 FY 16-2 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 Subtotal: Capital $45,000 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital 1 $990,615 $838,743 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,807 $12,064 (1) Number should tie to Table 5.2 A - Capital Project Justification (2) Please identify source of "Other" funds. Other Funds Include: T.R.I.P. Revenue Newspaper Revenue Advertising Revenue Charter Service Revenue Misc. Revenues/Interest $ 1,512 $ 750 $ 2,500 $ 300 $ 7,002 $ 12,064 Revised 5/21/2013 Summary of Funds Requested FY 2015/16.xls Table 5.2 — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY16-1 PROJECT NAME: Bus Stop Amenities PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase bus shelters be placed at bus stops where needed throughout the Palo Verde Valley. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) This project has been an ongoing project. The Agency would like to continue with the placement of bus shelters and benches at our bus stop locations. These amenities will provide passenger comfort while waiting for the transit bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $30,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Ballnce 46 Table 5.2 — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 16-2 PROJECT NAME: Bulk Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase in bulk, tires, filters, etc. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (refer to Commission policy entitled "Justification Requirements for Capital Projects) Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the vehicles with the supplies already on hand. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) $15,000 STA Funds PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance 47 TABLE 6—PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Prior Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2006 — FY 2009) Pursuant to the audit performed, PVVTA disclosed that the Agency was operating in an efficient and effective manner and therefore, there were no specific issues that needed improvement. Action(s) Taken And Results (1) None required. (1) If no action taken, provide schedule for implementation or explanation of why the recommendation is no longer relevant. 48 ti r+rsda {mOr insapahfim rnnmes7m Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency --IF_ Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 44,459 Passenger Miles 483,606 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 11,028.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 185,481.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 227,869.0 Total Operating Expenses $885,799 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $105,770 Net Operating Expenses $780,029 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 11.94% I >= 10.00% I 12.82% I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $80.32 <_ $87.89 $86.12 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $17.54 >_ $13.23 and <_ $17.91 $14.98 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $1.61 >_ $1.21 and <_ $1.63 $1.36 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $70.73 >_ $64.94 and <_ $87.86 $75.08 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.21 >_ $3.17 and <_ $4.29 $3.76 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 4.00 >= 4.17 and <= 5.64 5.00 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.24 >= 0.20 and <= 0.28 0.25 Meets Target ote: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: TransTrack Manager"' 5/28/2013 Page 1 of 1 tinnily Omer ISmSpatdim fansissie i FY 2013/14 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2011/12 End of Year Actual FY 2012/13 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2013/14 Plan FY 2013/14 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 41,945 33,015 45,794 None Passenger Miles 461,395 363,165 641,116 None Revenue Hours 8,926.0 6,585.0 9,701.0 None Total Hours 11,044.0 8,141.0 11,882.0 None Revenue Miles 179,971.0 131,430.0 179,363.0 None Total Miles 221,824.0 161,961.0 222,220.0 None Operating Costs $430,044 $567,110 $913,416 None Passenger Revenue $99,613 $72,684 $100,610 None Operating Subsidy $330,431 $494,426 $812,806 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $48.18 $86.12 $94.16 <_ $88.03 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $2.39 $4.31 $5.09 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $10.25 $17.18 $19.95 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 23.16% 12.82% 11.01% >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $7.88 $14.98 $17.75 >_ $12.74 and <_ $17.24 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.72 $1.36 $1.27 >_ $1.16 and <_ $1.56 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $37.02 $75.08 $83.79 >_ $63.87 and <_ $86.41 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $1.84 $3.76 $4.53 >_ $3.20 and <_ $4.32 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 4.70 5.00 4.70 >= 4.25 and <= 5.75 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.23 0.25 0.26 >= 0.21 and <= 0.29 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2013/14 Plan to the FY 2013/14 Primary Target. v-� TransTrack Manager"' 5/28/2013 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 9 — HIGHLIGHTS OF SRTP PRESENTATION ■ Transit service continues to be provided by contract with Transportation Concepts. ■ The Mobility Management Project is anticipated to renew current agreements with Caltrans to extend the project until 2014. ■ PVVTA will maintain current fare structure for services provided for FY 2013-14 with the possibility of implementing a modest increase in FY 2014/15. ■ PVVTA Blue Route 1 will continue to run the existing route with minor changes in frequency to unproductive areas. ■ PVVTA Gold Route 2 will continue to make extended route trips to the Palo Verde College only when the College is open. Short turns and layovers will be made to prevent unproductive trips. ■ PVVTA Red Route 3 will continue the additional roundtrip to the California State Prisons added in FY 2011/12. Possibly expand route service and schedule in FY 2013/14 depending on availability of JARC Grant Funds. ■ PVVTA Green Route 4 will continue to run the existing route. Staff will continue to monitor the service and analyze the feasibility of increasing frequency. ■ PVVTA Silver Route 5 will continue weekend/holiday service and have routing to all major weekend trip generators system -wide. ■ PVVTA will continue to run the new service implemented last year known as PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride which is a demand responsive service that addresses special areas in time where community events require general public transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system. ■ The Agency will continue to place passenger amenities (e.g. benches, shelters) at strategic location that promote new ridership and continued use of services. ■ Agency management will continue to focus on system productivity, mindful to TDA and RCTC Performance Improvement Plan requirements relative to the Farebox Recovery Ratio. ■ The Agency will work towards completing the construction and upgrades of the new Transit Facility in FY 2013/14 in order to meet the needs of the Transit Agency. Operating and Financial Data FY08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 Projected FY13-14 Planned System -wide Ridership 54,940 39,157 37,117 41,945 44,459 45,794 Cost Per Revenue Hour $81.54 $89.88 $84.64 $48.18 $86.12 $94.16 Productivity Performance Summary: The proposed PVVTA FY13-14 SRTP, meets one of one mandatory indicator and meets 4 of 7 discretionary indicators. 51 Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2011/12 Audit FY 12/13 (Estimate) FY 13/14 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 83,253 84,910 89,385 2.Interest 119 3,000 3,800 3. General Fund Supplement 9,783 9,215 - 4. Measure A - - 5. Advertising Revenue 1,500 3,000 1 1,500 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets - - - 7. CNG Revenue - - - 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - - 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - - 10. Investment Income - - - 11. CalPers CERBT - - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - - - 13. Other Revenues 4,959 5,145 1 5,925 TOTAL REVENUE 99,614 105,270 100,610 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 430,044 885,799 913,416 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 23.16% 11.88% 11.01% 52 City of Arts & Innovation0, i SfylOR AND DISABLED TRANSPORTATION 951.681.8080 City of Riverside FY 2013/14 - 2015/15 Short Range Transit Plan City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/165 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS System Overview 1 Existing Service and Route Performance 3 Planned Service Changes and Implementation 5 Financial and Capital Plans 6 Table 1 — Fleet Inventory 8 Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary 9 Table 3 — SRTP Route Statistics 10 Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 12 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification, Project No 14-1 13 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification, Project No 14-2 14 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification, Project No 14-3 15 Table 5.1 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2014/15 16 Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 16 Table 5.1 A — Capital Project Justification, Project No 15-1 and 16-1 17 Table 6 — Progress to Implement Triennial Performance Audit 18 Table 7 — Service Provider Performance Targets Report 19 Table 8 — SRTP Performance Report 20 Table 9 — Highlights of 2013/14 - 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan 21 Table 9A — Operating & Financial Data 22 Table 9B — Fare Revenue Calculation 23 City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan I. SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Service Area Special Transportation, a section within the City of Riverside Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department, has been offering Paratransit services to the Riverside community since 1975. This dial -a -ride transportation service is provided within the 87.4 square mile incorporated city limits of the City of Riverside, shown below in Figure 1-1. Figure 1-1 RIVERSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS Compap �wPopo Poo ',Pop Cap, Nou moon Xpo,N P spun, GNP.. a w., umour ■ Nap - ham Poo* Som. / . r • /ter 1 , st.:_: ! /y �y4l; f?Z� ... r> /.r L �'' 11 r { �t,s-- �` r / ��` • / Jvtrl4T ^ r• -N,sr� 5h.I `s i{{�I)•it?�/J {\ i \\'tMra t,� `\'t{ I r L;I iifl.r t• r{{t .h 4�✓!r4( �.r `11 +c.! J 22: ' —,1% ' if I }tom1i•r-\\� .�1�m��/�I \ / i �i }�`4 I .-v ri y. . ,� L/y 111 . i i - ,\/s ` n'iit y � ,,e)-.-- % / � I 'ice( , / ..3,�u,�j -�\ .. r\��`�F;,t `•� ,,•3. 4r7 .'., -S.''f , �'e,;,• .r /in r�` \ .., ? ..(.1 ( tr-. � iq" (t .. I • \1k t .— 1fi -`� \/,.; J y`4 1 -ii_. ..Il "'.` , '.`.''+li \i '• \ •- _ S'g'w / ``' ." �`i \ \ \, I~ t ip : i7,1 ' i......,t4I 113 1.2 Population Profile N A According to the 2010 demographic data published by the United States Census Bureau, the population of the City of Riverside totals 303,871 residents. The senior population within the City of Riverside (those over 60 years of age) accounts for approximately 13% of the City population. Staff anticipates an increase in the senior population and in ridership due to the age demographics of the City. Ridership has been trending upward for the past several years and continues to increase. -1- City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan 1.3 Paratransit Services Owned and operated by the City of Riverside, Special Transportation is an origin -to - destination rideshare transportation service. The service is limited to senior citizens (60 years and older) and persons with disabilities (disabilities require a physician's documentation). Operating hours for Special Transportation are Monday through Friday, from 8:00 am - 5:30 pm and 9:00 am - 4:00 pm during weekends and holidays. In order to reserve a ride, passengers must call Special Transportation's reservation phone number during the office hours of 8:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, and 9:00 am - 3:00 pm on weekends and holidays. A message machine is available after business hours for cancellations. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure Fare for a one-way trip is $2.00 per passenger. Clients may pay their fare in cash at boarding time, or purchase tickets or a punch card in advance of their scheduled ride. A ticket may be purchased for $2.00 and is worth one ride; a punch card may be purchased for $40 and is worth 20 rides. There are no proposals for an increase in fares during fiscal year 2013/14. 1.5 Revenue Fleet The City of Riverside Special Transportation has been operating a fleet of 30 Paratransit compressed natural gas (CNG), alternative fuel, Type III vehicles. In the past, 25 Paratransit vehicles and 25 routes have typically met daily ridership demands. Special Transportation is preparing to expand its fleet by five vehicles and replace eight vehicles during the 2013/14 fiscal year. Although not assigned to a route and typically used as an alternative vehicle, Special Transportation also owns one Paratransit van equipped to hold 6 passengers and one wheelchair. Special Transportation also owns one passenger car. 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities Special Transportation facilities are located at the City of Riverside corporation yard. Included in the facilities are administrative office space, dispatch room, training and conference room, and parking space for transit vehicles. Special Transportation's vehicles are maintained in the City's fleet bay, which is used for all city vehicles. Special Transportation is currently completing construction of a new CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility to be used primarily for maintaining Special Transportation's vehicles. Construction was to have been completed by June 2012; however, the projected completion date has been delayed to May 2013. The facility will include 5 bays, an office, and an upstairs area for parts and storage. The facility will be outfitted with all safety equipment required to maintain alternative fuel vehicles. - 2 - City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Following construction completion of the CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Special Transportation will begin to make progress on Special Transportation's Slow Fill Station Expansion project and Operations Facility Modernization and Expansion project. In order to meet fueling demands, Special Transportation staff anticipates installing 20 slow fill stations. The project will be funded by federal and local funds. Special Transportation was awarded Proposition 1 B funds to expand and modernize its operation facility. In-house City staff is currently working on the design of this project to include expansion of the drivers' break room and dispatch office. II. EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance Special Transportation served approximately 170,000 passengers during the 2012/13 fiscal year. Ridership is projected to increase to approximately 177,000 in FY 2013/14. 2.2 Key Performance Indicators Special Transportation meets its performance targets in seven of the eight critical areas. During fiscal year 2012/13, Special Transportation met its mandatory farebox recovery ratio target and met six out of the seven discretionary performance areas, as shown in Figure II-1. Figure II-1 Performance Indicators Performance Scorecard' Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour 2. Subsidy Per Passenger 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile 4. Subsidy Per Hour 5. Subsidy Per Mile 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile Meets Target Does Not Meet Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target 2.3 Productivity Improvement Efforts Special Transportation strives to operate an efficient and effective service and continues to seek ways to decrease costs while maintaining high productivity. Specifically, staff has been focusing on implementing the most efficient routes possible in order to maintain or decrease operating costs. Special Transportation has taken the step to assign one dispatcher the task of analyzing routes every day in order to ensure that driver overtime costs are as minimal as possible. Performance Scorecard based on FY 2012/13 3rd quarter data. - 3 - City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Special Transportation is currently in the process of hiring additional part-time drivers to meet the high ridership demand. Part-time drivers are used during peak time, effectively shortening travel times between pickups and drop offs currently scheduled in routes driven by full-time drivers. Utilizing additional part-time drivers will allow for more effective scheduling and a decrease in overtime costs. 2.4 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next Two Years Due to the demographics of the City and current trends, staff anticipates an increase in ridership in the next several years. Senior population within the City amounts to approximately 13% and residents nearing the age of 60 amount to 18% of the population, as shown in Figure II-2, leading staff to anticipate a higher demand for Special Transportation services in the future. Figure II-2 25,000 20,000 c 71 15,000 as .24) 10,000 E z 5,000 City of Riverside Age Demographics 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85 and Over Age Group 2.5 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs ■ Population Special Transportation is in the process of meeting its immediate equipment and facility needs by completing construction of a new CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility to be used primarily for maintaining Special Transportation's vehicles. Following construction completion of the CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Special Transportation will begin to make progress on Special Transportation's Slow Fill Station Expansion project. In order to meet fueling demands of an expanding fleet, Special Transportation staff anticipates installing five slow fill stations. 4 City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Special Transportation will also utilize Proposition 16 funds to expand and modernize its operation facility. The improved facility will include a conference meeting room, dispatch office and a reception area for passengers. In-house City staff is in the process of designing a more user friendly and efficient layout for employees and customers alike. III. PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes Special Transportation did not implement any service changes during the 2012/13 fiscal year, other than mailing out purchased punched cards via certified mail to prevent losses. 3.2 Recommended Modification to Paratransit Services Due to peak ridership demand, Special Transportation will add four additional routes to weekday services. Adding four additional routes will allow Special Transportation staff to more effectively and efficiently serve its clients. In order to maintain its spare ratio, Special Transportation is expanding its fleet by five vehicles. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion Although ridership has increased in record numbers, Special Transportation continues to promote its services. Special Transportation has installed advertisements on the back windows of several vehicles in order to market the services it offers. The advertisements include information such as the cost of fare and the phone number to call in order to make a reservation. Special Transportation regularly prints out flyers and brochures to distribute to the City's community centers and senior centers and also includes ads on other City publications such as the department's activity guide and senior guide. Staff makes an effort to be present at special events (wellness fairs, grand openings, concerts, etc.) to conduct outreach to the public and distribute promotional products. To obtain feedback on the services it offers to the public, Special Transportation staff distributed the 3rd Annual Passenger Satisfaction Survey to its passengers during the fiscal year 2013. Survey categories included customer service, safety, ease of scheduling a reservation, and vehicle cleanliness. Staff will review and consider passenger feedback in making policy and operational changes. Results of the survey will be compiled by July 2013. 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes Special Transportation expects to maintain its farebox recovery ratio after adding four additional routes and will request additional maintenance funds from FTA in order to sustain the costs of maintaining additional vehicles. Special Transportation is required to maintain a 10% farebox recovery ratio. During the 2012/13 fiscal year, Special Transportation maintained a 10.27% farebox recovery ratio. - 5 - City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan IV. FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget Special Transportation relies on Local Transportation Funds (LTF) to support its operating budget with the exclusion of the preventative maintenance budget. Special Transportation utilizes 5307 federal funds to fund the preventative maintenance of its fleet. Special Transportation's overall budget for the 2013/14 fiscal year has increased by 3% in comparison to the 2012/13 fiscal year, as shown in Figure IV-1. Special Transportation is requesting an additional $90,816 in LTF funds to cover increasing operating expenses. Fioure IV-1 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 Budget Item SRTP Plan Variance $ Amount % Salaries & Benefits 2,035,419 2,125,458 90,039 5% Materials & Supplies 241,911 233,866 -8,045 -4% Fuel 225,000 225,000 0 0% Maintenance 400,000 400,00 0 0% Contract Services 15,000 0 -15,000 -100% Other Expenses 387,814 411,636 23,822 7% TOTAL 3,305,144 3,395,960 90,816 3% Personnel costs, in the form of driver staff hours and related benefits, have risen due to increased ridership. Special Transportation is partially funding a contracted security guard for the 2013/14 fiscal year in order to enhance security of the parking lot and CNG Vehicle Maintenance facilities. Special Transportation will also be asking for an increased allocation to upgrade an Office Specialist position to a Senior Office Specialist, as well as an upgrade of the Analyst position to Senior Analyst/Transit Manager and to fund an additional Minibus Driver/Scheduler. - 6 - City of Riverside 2013/14-2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program Special Transportation will continue to take advantage of available grant opportunities, such as the California Department of Transportation Proposition 1 B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvements, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA), in order to support its capital programs. Last year, Special Transportation applied for PTMISEA funds to purchase five replacement vehicles and supplement the existing capital budget for the Operations Facility Modernization and Expansion project. Special Transportation also applied for Proposition 1 B Security Funds to install security lighting and cameras and using a combination of State Transit Assistance (STA) and 5307 federal funds to support the lease of a Xerox machine. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Special Transportation strives to remain compliant with all local, state and federal regulations. Staff stays abreast of legislative information and developments by attending workshops, trainings, and conferences which are frequently offered free of charge to transit operators. Special Transportation complies with FTA reporting requirements such as the submission of monthly and annual National Transit Database (NTD) reports. Special Transportation experienced three minor deficiencies, which have since been corrected, and closed the annual NTD report for FY 2011/12. Special Transportation completed its last FTA Triennial Review in 2012 with no deficiencies. The next FTA Triennial Review is scheduled for August of 2015. In accordance with the 2010 Transportation Development Act Performance Review recommendations, Special Transportation implemented a passenger satisfaction survey to distribute annually to its passengers. Additionally, staff is reviewing the possibility of terminating the subscription service, which provided the opportunity for riders to pay a flat fee for unlimited rides, due to lack of public interest. There were no violations noted in the areas of Maintenance, Driver Records or Driver Hours of Services on its 2012/13 California Highway Patrol Safety Compliance Terminal Inspection. In compliance with Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) requirements, Special Transportation purchases solely alternative fuel vehicles for its revenue rolling stock fleet. LZ9'86 bZ8'856'Z 669'T6E'Z OE OE 56 EI0zna „ l3a6euep► veusuer1 899'69 L£9'T8 980'LT T 69Z'L0T LZS'SZT 8bb`E9T £i7L'8Z £T/ZTOZ M (43aep4 "&e) elea-of-aeaA KO eV ap!4eA ancpd add sal!W euirm i ebeaand ZL9'8GZ 99£'9i8 069'9£6 69Z'G0i 9£9'LZ9 81►b'£9T £bL'8Z £T/ZTOZ M tpaew 46nonp sel!W aP14eA WO 04 aI 6T6'ILT T6£'88S ZI£'bi8 Tbb'S6 ST6'Tb5 L8T'ESI b£S'9Z ZT/TTOZ Ad Pea aeeA aolad send eP!4aA area w sin N9 N9 N9 �A N9 N9 V9 £T/ZTOZ Ad ET/ZTOZ eP03 sapl4aq adAl bue6upuoD saP leA land # ann3V 40 # SZ SZ SZ SZ SZ SZ ST 9T 9T 9I bT VI ZI L tp6ual peddlnb3 Amedep dwell 6upeas pue inn al3149A na na f16 f16 ne f19 ne aPo3 lePoW ab3 TTOZ a2f3 OTOZ 4213 800Z N43 800Z NO3 LOOZ N43 SOOZ 4WJ 800Z ePo3 31!n8 SiN aeeA pa4eaad0 ApDaa!a / asuodsab puewea appaeium jo itu3 meld;isueal 06unlVoyS Pr/STOW A1®.1119Auj 490/d - T emu ®an illum)wrimu boosoatedzo Gincoimcisi Table 2 -- City of Riverside -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics . 114-Mggerai El '''''''rnr---7,7,- MQ/4.4-redA ,'.. .. 44.-.Igraira , tgkiM, am= wagagameam Peak -Hour Fleet 29 , 29 Financial Data '''''F'''Welll fffErfealP5.''F,. gP.'ili*T.MP"'"..- -1 !.'751'.'JmATI., -- ...0-- -0 ',' Ti:Z...31.4TRilaRS Total Operating Expenses $2,941,368 $3,036,822 $3,305,143 $2,420,925 $3,395,960 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $344,366 $370,773 $367,127 $248,528 $366,630 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $2,597,002 , $2,666,049 $2,938,016 $2,172,397 $3,029,330 Operating Characteristics .;;ft4W1W,,N; RITIM3045i , ,ti-k.;niN kaatratV- Unlinked Passenger Trips 161,242 174,058 178,088 127,140 177,000 Passenger Miles 935,204 1,009,536 971,953 737,412 1,012,451 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Hours (a) 43,234.0 46,896.8 48,172.0 36,822.0 50,179.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 613,384.0 680,455.0 673,257.0 520,341.0 701,309.0 Total Actual Vehide Miles 690,556.0 760,457.0 783,244.0 584,035.0 815,879.0 Performance Characteristics ,. - . liggitNi-,- ,,.:-.?-44f.. 4,4"7-''''t,41b.-,.. 'FilifekAige 0, , MiVeittININ Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $68.03 $64.76 $68.61 $65.75 $67.68 Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.71 oh 12.21 % 11.10 % 10.27 % 10.79 Subsidy per Passenger $16.11 $15.32 $16.50 $17.09 $17.11 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.78 $2.64 $3.02 $2.95 $2.99 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $60.07 $56.85 $60.99 $59.00 $60.37 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.23 $3.92 $4.36 $4.17 $4.32 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.5 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.25 " - • - - _ Rail Modes Miles in ours r r or Railes. TransTrack Manager' 5/1/2013 minis ,„Ja6eueN veusueal 0££'6Z0'£S 0£9'99£$ 096'S6£'£$ O'6L8'SIB O'60£'IOL O'ZOS'SS 0'6LI'OS TSVZTO'T 000'LLT 6Z sinelJaRmud ea! ueS 0££'6Z0'£$ 0£9'MS 096'S6£'E$ O'6L8'ST8 O'60£'TOL WZOS'SS 0'6LI'OS TSVZTO'T 000'LLI 6Z 1401 21Na-SST! Appgns PN anuawaa ;sod JoGuessed 6ul;efadO sal}Ni lo]ol soIlW aruawaa smog smog seIlW }e;ol anuanaa m6uassed sJa6uassed saplyaA Need adAl Aea # Knot s;uawal3 e;ea Boa nv bT/ETOZ Ad -- appaanfti;o Ails aziJsgeJS aJno2/ dla/S - £ awl %miyamq gm%°p"'0 �� agn MS won Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Riverside -- 4 FY 2013/14 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile 1155-DAR Total $67.68 $4.84 $19.19 10.79 % $17.11 $2.99 $60.37 $4.32 3.5 0.25 Service Provider Totals $67,68 $4.84 $19.19 10.79 % $17.11 $2.99 $60.37 $4.32 3.5 0.25 TransTrack Manager' 5/1/2013 City of Riverside FY 2013/14 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 Project Description Capital Project Number to Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 16 (PTMISEA) Prop 16 Security Section 5307 - Riv- San. Bndo Fare Box Other (2) Local Transportation Funds $2,995,960 $2,629,330 $366,630 Operating Assistance Capitalized Preventive $400,000 $80,000 $320,000 Maintenance Subtotal: Operating $3,395,960 $2,709,330 $0 $0 $0 $320,000 $366,630 $0 Special Transportation Security and Safety Improvements FY 14 - 1 $47,540 $47,540 (2011 /12) Special Transportation Security and Safety Improvements FY 14 - 2 $48,474 $48,474 (2012/13) Lease of Office FY 14 - 3 $20,000 $4,000 $16,000 Equipment Subtotal: Capital $116,014 $0 $4,000 $0 $96,014 $16,000 $0. $0 Total: Operating & Capital $3,511,974 $2,709,330 $4,000 $0 $96,014 $336,000 $366,6301 $0 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 14-1 PROJECT NAME: Security and Safety Improvements (2011/12) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To enhance security of the Special Transportation parking lot, Operations Facility, and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Maintenance Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: City of Riverside, Special Transportation would like to install additional lighting and cameras within/near the Special Transportation parking lot, Alternative Fuel Vehicle Maintenance Facility and Operations Facility. Special Transportation may also use the funding to purchase additional emergency response and security equipment. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1 B Security $47,540 STA $0 Total $47,540 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 2010/11 Prop 1B Security $47,545 - 13 - Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 14-2 PROJECT NAME: Security and Safety Improvements (2012/13) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To enhance security of the Special Transportation parking lot, Operations Facility, and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Maintenance Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: City of Riverside, Special Transportation would like to purchase security equipment or install additional security measures in Special Transportation's facilities including the parking lot and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Maintenance Facility. As the operations facility is being renovated, Special Transportation may equip the new facility with additional security measures such as fencing and upgraded cameras. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED); Prop 1 B Security $48,474 STA $0 Total $48,474 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance Prop 1 B Security (2010/11) $47,545 Prop 1B Security (2011/12) $47,540 - 14 - Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 14-3 PROJECT NAME: Lease of Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To lease support equipment (division Xerox machine). PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation would like to lease support equipment needed for operations (division Xerox machine). PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Sec 5307 $16,000 STA $4,000 Total $20,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance CA-90- Y948-00 Lease of Support Equip $20,000 - 15 - City of Riverside FY 2014/15 and FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2014/15 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B (PTMISEA) Section 5307 - Riv- San. Bndo Fare Box Other (2) Local Transportation Funds Operating Assistance Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $3,015,000 $450,000 $2,650,000 $90,000 $360,000 $365,000 Subtotal: Operating $3,465,000 $2,740,000 $360,000 $365,000 Paratransit Vehicles for Replacement - Six Vehicles FY 15 - 1 $700,000 $119,000 $581,000 Subtotal: Capital $700,000 $119,000 $581,000 Total: Operating & Capital 1 $4,165,0001 $2,740,0001 $119,0001 1 $941,0001 $365,0001 Table 5.2 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B (PTMISEA) Section 5307 - Riv- San. Bndo Fare Box Other (2) Local Transportation Funds Operating Assistance Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $3,020,000 $450,000 $2,648,000 $90,000 $360,000 $372,000 Subtotal: Operating $3,470,000 $2,738,000 $360,000 $372,000 Paratransit Vehicles for Replacement - Six Vehicles FY 16 - 1 $700,000 $119,000 $581,000 Subtotal: Capital $700,000 $119,000 $581,000 Total: Operating & Capital 1 $4,170,0001 $2,738,0001 $119,0001 1 $941,0001 $372,0001 Revised 05/17/2013 Summary of Funds Requested FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16.xls Table 5.1 A — Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 15-1 and FY 16-1 PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Replacement (Six Vehicles) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To replace vehicles that have accrued 150,000 miles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation replaces vehicles that have reached 150,000 miles, in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Sec 5307 $581,000 STA $119,000 Total $700,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance CA-90- Y948-00 N/A Vehicle Replacement $475,000 CA-90- Y848-00 N/A Vehicle Replacement $96,002 Total $571, 002 - 17 - TABLE 6 — PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TDA TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2006/07 — FY 2008/091) Action(s) Taken And Results To Datez 1. Need to Conduct Surveys of Riders and Special Transportation staff now Non -Riders on a More Frequent Basis distributes annual surveys to its riders. Formal surveys of riders and non -riders have not been performed in the last few years. Survey categories include safety, cleanliness, timeliness, and customer service. Although customer survey comment cards are available to all riders and are located in the Paratransit vehicles, the comment cards are strictly voluntary and do not necessarily capture key information that will assist STS in improving service. Surveys of both riders and non -riders may provide valuable input to the operator in order to address the needs of the community and to understand the rider's perception of the dial -a -ride service. As such, a more formal survey performed at least annually is warranted. Complete. 2. Need to Publish Information Regarding the Staff is reviewing the possibility of Availability of Premium Subscription Services terminating subscription lack of public interest. service due to Information regarding the availability of premium subscription services that provides unlimited rides for $90.00 per month is not disclosed in STS' brochure or on the City's webpage for Special Transportation. As an In progress. STS goal has been to offer a subscription service to riders that is both affordable and cost effective, it would be prudent to actively publish and market this information wherever possible to reach out to both riders and the general public. Triennial performance audit for FY 2006/07 through FY 2008/09 was conducted in FY 2009/10 and completed 6/30/10. 2 If no action taken, provide schedule for implementation or explanation of why the recommendation is no longer relevant. - 18 - aari&Cos* I Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets deport FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Riverside Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 178,088 Passenger Miles 971,953 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 48,172.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 673,257.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 783,244.0 Total Operating Expenses $3,305,143 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $367,127 Net Operating Expenses $2,938,016 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 11.10 %' >= 10.00% I 10.27 %' Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $68.61 <= $64.23 $65.75 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $16.50 >= $12.69 and <= $17.17 $17.09 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $3.02 >= $2.18 and <= $2.96 $2.95 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $60.99 >= $46.93 and <= $63.49 $59.00 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.36 >_ $3.23 and <= $4.37 $4.17 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 3.70 >= 3.15 and <= 4.26 3.50 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.26 >= 0.21 and <= 0.29 0.24 Meets Target : Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: 'Service Provider Comments: TransTradr Manager"" 5/1/2013 IN awitieCoutrIngetaddito(aasisiol FY 2013/14 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; City ofRiverside Ali Routes Performance Indicators FY 2011/12 End of Year Actual FY 2012/13 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2013/14 Plan FY 2013/14 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 174,058 127,140 177,000 None 6 Passenger Miles 1,009,536 737,412 1,012,451 None Revenue Hours 46,896.8 36,822.0 50,179.0 None Total Hours 51,721.2 42,346.0 55,502.0 None Revenue Miles 680,455.0 520,341.0 701,309.0 None Total Miles 760,457.0 584,035.0 815,879.0 None Operating Costs $3,036,822 $2,420,925 $3,395,960 None Passenger Revenue $370 773 $248,528 $366,630 None Operating Subsidy $2,666,049 $2,172,397 $3,029,330 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $64.76 $65.75 $67.68 <_ $67.21 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $4.46 $4.65 $4.84 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $17.45 $19.04 $19.19 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.21 % 10.27 % 10.79 % >= 10.00/0 Meets Target,. Subsidy Per Passenger $15.32 $17.09 $17.11 >_ $14.53 and <_ $19.65 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $2.64 $2.95 $2.99 >_ $2.51 and <_ $3.39 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $56.85 $59.00 $60.37 >_ $50.15 and <_ $67.85 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $3.92 $4.17 $4.32 >_ $3.54 and <_ $4.80 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 3.70 3.50 3.50 >= 2.98 and <= 4.03 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.26 0.24 0.25 >= 0.20 and <= 0.28 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2013/14 Plan to the FY 2013/14 Primary Target. TiansTiadr Manager m 5/17/2013 TABLE 9 — HIGHLIGHTS OF 2013/14 — 2015/16 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN ■ Proposition 1 B Security Grant — To enhance safety and security, Special Transportation applied for almost $50,000 to install additional lighting and cameras in its parking lot and newly constructed CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility. Staff is also planning to purchase emergency response equipment. ■ Proposition 1 B Capital Grant — Special Transportation applied for approximately $615,000 to purchase five 16-passenger Paratransit vehicles. ■ 2012/13 Annual Passenger Satisfaction Survey — In December of 2012, Special Transportation distributed a passenger satisfaction survey in order to obtain feedback regarding the transportation services it provides to the community. Survey categories included customer service, safety, ease of scheduling a reservation, and vehicle cleanliness. Results of the survey will be compiled by July 2013. ■ Special Transportation Marketing and Advertisements — In order to increase ridership, Special Transportation installed advertisements of its services on the back windows of several minibuses. The advertisements contained a slogan and information regarding the City's transportation service. Special Transportation also provides brochures in both English and Spanish. ■ Capital Projects — o CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility Construction — The construction of the CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility will be complete in June 2013. The facility is being constructed with 6 bays, an office, and a large, upper level storage area for parts and equipment. o Slow Fill Stations Installation — Following completion of the CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility Construction Project, Special Transportation staff will be installing additional slow fill stations at the City of Riverside Corporation Yard in order to meet fueling demands. Staff plans to install five slow fill stations during the 2013/14 fiscal year. o Vehicle Procurement and Delivery — Special Transportation will be replacing eight 16 passenger, Paratransit vehicles with grant funds received through the Federal Transit Administration and a Proposition 1 B capital grant. Vehicles will be delivered by the end of the 2013 calendar year. o Operations Facility Modernization and Expansion — Staff is currently working on the design plan of modernizing and expanding Special -21 - Transportation's operations facility. Included in the Special Transportation's operation facility are administrative offices, dispatch room, and training and conference room. Expanding and modernizing the existing facilities will accommodate a larger dispatch center, separate conference room, and a reception area for clients seeking to purchase bus passes. Expanding this operational facility will increase efficiency within the transit operation and enhance passenger access. ■ Performance Target Report — Special Transit plans to meet the mandatory farebox recovery ratio target and meet six of the seven discretionary performance indicators in the FY 2013/14 (shown in Figure 9). Transit operators are required to meet at least four of the seven discretionary performance indicators. Figure 9 Performance Status Performance Indicators Scorecard Mandatory Farebox Recovery Ratio Meets Target Discretionary Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger Meets Target Subsidy Per Passen er Mile Meets Target Subsidy Per Hour Meets Target Subsidy Per Mile Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour Meets Target Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile Operating and Financial Data for the past four years and for the 2013/14 Fiscal Year are shown below. Table 9-A Operating & FY Financial FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY2011/12 FY 2012/13 2013/14 Data (Plan) System wide Ridership Operating Cost per Revenue Hours 152,472 $70.86 161,242 $68.03 174,058 $64.76 170,000 $65.75 177,000 $67.68 - 22 - Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2011/12 Audit FY 12/13 (Estimate) FY 13/14 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 370,773 367,127 366,630 2.Interest - - - 3. General Fund Supplement - - - 4. Measure A - - - 5. Advertising Revenue - - - 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets - - - 7. CNG Revenue - - - 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - - - 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - - - 10. Investment Income - - - 11. CalPers CERBT - - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - - - 13.Other Revenues 3,199 1,500 2,500 TOTAL REVENUE 373,972 368,627 369,130 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 3,070,344 3,305,143 3,395,960 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 12.18% 11.15% 10.87% - 23 - r RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGE \ C Y SHORT RANG,. TRANSIT PLAN lux Riverside Transit Agency Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riverside Transit Agency Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW 2 1.1 JURISDICTION 2 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS 3 Population Profile — Rider Characteristics 3 Demographic Projections 4 1.3 FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES 5 Fixed Route Services 5 Paratransit Services 6 Consolidated Transportation Services Agency 6 1.4 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE 7 Cooperative Fare and Subsidy Programs 8 1.5 REVENUE FLEET 9 1.6 EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES 9 Operational Facilities 9 Facility Modernization 10 CHAPTER 2: ROUTE PERFORMANCE & EXISTING SERVICE 11 2.1 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 11 Service Standards and Warrants 11 Productivity vs. Coverage Target 12 New Service Warrants 13 Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) 13 2.2 EXISTING FIXED ROUTE & DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE 15 2.3 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS 16 2.4 TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROWTH MARKETS 16 2.5 TRANSIT CENTERS, EQUIPMENT AND PASSENGER AMENITIES 16 Passenger Transit Facilities 17 Equipment and Passenger Amenities 19 CHAPTER 3: PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 22 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES 22 3.2 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 22 3.3 MODIFICATIONS TO PARATRANSIT SERVICE 23 3.4 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION 24 3.5 BUDGET IMPACT ON PROPOSED CHANGES 26 CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL & CAPITAL PLANS 27 4.1 OPERATING & CAPITAL BUDGET 27 4.2 FUNDING SOURCES FOR OPERATING & CAPITAL PROGRAMS 30 4.3 REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 i Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rieersfde Tra nsft Agency Tables: Comparative Table 1 Table 2 Table 2A Table 3 Table 3A Table 4 Table 4A Table 5.1 Table 5.1A Table 5.2 Table 5.2A Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9A Table 9B Statistics Fleet Inventory a. Motor Bus (Directly Operated) b. Motor Bus (Contracted) c. Demand Response SRTP Service Summary a. Routes: All Routes (System -wide Totals) b. Routes: Non -Excluded Routes c. Routes: Excluded Routes d. Program: Directly Operated Fixed Routes e. f g• Excluded Routes for FY13/14 SRTP Route Statistics Individual Route Descriptions Summary of Funds Requested for FY13/14 Capital Project Justification Summary of Funds Requested in FY14/15 Capital Project Justification for FY14/15 Summary of Funds Requested in FY15/16 Capital Project Justification for FY15/16 FY10 State Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations Service Provider Performance Target Report FY13/14 SRTP Performance Report Highlights of SRTP Fare Revenue Calculation Program: Contracted Fixed Routes Program: Dial -A -Ride Program: Taxi Appendix A: RTA System Map and Fixed Route Maps Appendix B: Service Standards and Warrants Appendix C: Public Hearing Policy for Major Service and Fare Changes Appendix D: Sustainable Funding Source Policy ii Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS 5307 Federal funds in urban areas (formula) 5309 Federal funds for capital investments (competitive) 5311 Federal funds in non -urbanized (rural) areas (formula) 5316 Federal funds for the Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 5317 Federal funds for the New Freedom Program ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ATIS Advanced Traveler Information System BRT Bus Rapid Transit CNG Compressed Natural Gas COA Comprehensive Operational Analysis CPI Consumer Price Index CTSA Consolidated Transportation Services Agency CTSGP-CTAF California Transit Security Grant Program — California Transit Assistance Fund DAR Dial -A -Ride Paratransit Services DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise EEO Equal Employment Opportunity FTA Federal Transit Administration FY Fiscal Year GASB General Accounting Standards Board HSR California High -Speed Rail ITS Intelligent Transportation System JARC Job Access and Reverse Commute, also known as FTA Section 5316 LEP Limited English Proficiency LTF Local Transportation Fund March JPA March Joint Powers Authority MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization NF New Freedom Program, also known as FTA Section 5317 OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OPEB Other Post -Employment Benefits OPEB ARC Other Post -Employment Benefits — Annual Required Contribution PEPRA Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2012 PIP Productivity Improvement Program PTMISEA Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement and Service Enhancement Account RCC Riverside City College RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTPA Regional Transportation Planning Agency SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SGR State of Good Repair SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance TDA Transportation Development Act T-NOW Transportation NOW TSP Transit Signal Priority TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee U-Pass University Pass UZA Urbanized Area as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau WRCOG Western Riverside Council of Governments III Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) is created to inform RTA stakeholders of transit developments in western Riverside County. The plan is a status overview of the existing local and regional transit network and sets the framework for enhancements for the next three fiscal years (FY): 2014 to 2016. Upon approval by the RTA Board of Directors, the SRTP is submitted to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) for approval and funds programming of operational expenses and capital projects. As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), RCTC is responsible for coordinating the transportation planning efforts in the county and submitting to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), a list of transportation projects in the region. This critical step is required for the inclusion of capital projects to receive state and federal funding, whereas operational plans are primarily funded through local revenue sources. In recent years, RTA has taken precautionary measures to ensure that, in light of declining revenue streams, existing services are sustainable and capacity for growth can be obtained. Improvements in route productivity, coupled with cost cutting strategies, have proven to be effective and, for the second straight fiscal year, RTA has experienced record ridership. To address such growth, service plans in FY13 included slight expansions focused on frequency improvements to resolve passenger overload issues during peak periods along major corridors and to trip generators, such as schools and employment centers. Overall ridership growth is expected to continue at a modest pace. However, increases in ridership during peak periods will be more prevalent in most areas given the successes of various pass programs and the demand for more alternative modes of transportation. Beginning in FY14, service enhancements are designed to improve on -time performance and connections, lengthen span of service on select routes, and reinstate Sunday -level service on three (3) major holidays. Other major planning efforts will focus on the completion of a system -wide Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) and transit center feasibility studies that will provide strategic improvement plans for the next five to ten years. RTA's total FY14 budget is at $78.8 million which includes $61.2 million in operating expenses and $17.7 million for capital improvements. The Operating Budget increase of $3.1 million, or 5% over FY13, is due to modest service expansion; established rates for purchased transportation; completion of a COA study; bus branding; minor headcount growth; wage increases per contract; and increased medical costs. The Capital Budget is decreasing $15.0 million, or 46%, over FY13 due to reduced funding requirements for facilities and the heavy- duty Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) bus fleet replacement. 1 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riverside Transit Agency CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 JURISDICTION RTA's jurisdiction is the second largest in the nation for a transit system, encompassing approximately 2,500 square miles of western Riverside County. Included in the boundaries are eighteen (18) incorporated cities including Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula, Wildomar, and unincorporated jurisdictions in the County of Riverside. Unlike other agencies of similar size, RTA is unique in that it provides service in both urban and rural areas. Urbanized and rural areas are defined by the United States Census Bureau (US Census), based on population size, and revised every ten years. The urbanized areas (UZA) in the jurisdiction are called Riverside -San Bernardino, Hemet, and Murrieta-Temecula- Menifee. Portions of RTA routes also connect to Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim and San Diego UZAs. Approximately 95% of RTA's services are located in urban areas based on 2010 Census data. The map below illustrates RTA's jurisdictional boundaries and highlights the portions of the region considered urbanized. ula •,i::n[ua Iley Pomona rut 60 fond Bar Chino Hi[IS 83 Ontario Chino Lus Serranus •_hino HAS 1.yt Slate Part ba Linda lacentia 911.t"- N Park ge North Tustin na Tustin S18 5 26! 133 rVlne Foothill Ranch Rancho Santa Lake Forest Margarita 3 - Cleveland Mission Viejo Laguna Hills zsi Laguna O%` Niguel Laguna Beach 74j ;y G Glen Avon Rubidoux Eastvale Norco Corona Jurupa Riverside Valley Like Home Gardens Woodrrest Perris State Lake El Cerrito ,l futhew3 San Juan Capistrano Dana Point Sart Clemente Santiago Peak LI rri Va11ey Moreno Valley Recreation Nea Lakeview Nuevo Perris San Jacinto Sobutra I.R. Homeland Hemet Valle Vista East Hemet Sun City Lake Elsinore Canyon Lake al Foics! Voldorrar Murrieta Temecula Winchester aamand Valley Lake L:liaaya San ;. Wild% Mt Sar Stet Idyll% c.fl nh. Reser NA'--OA-'t'0 %i3Pal ciiysoft CorporaSen 2 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riverside Transit Agency 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS RTA is challenged by changing demographics in various communities and continues to be proactive by planning routes that are customer -oriented, viable, efficient, and cost-effective. By studying the characteristics of riders, a better understanding is gained to more appropriately plan for and meet the needs of the transit market. Rider characteristics, along with demographic and population changes, are used to shape and strategize how resources will be allocated in future years. Population Profile — Rider Characteristics Bus passenger characteristics were developed from on -board surveys conducted in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 guidelines. A demographic summary of weekday RTA riders offered the following characteristics: Summary of Rider Characteristics General Demographics o Ethnicity: 39% Hispanic, 27% Caucasian/White, 23% African American/Black, 4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 2% Native American, 5% Other o Gender: 51% Female, 49% Male o Median Age: 34.5 Income Level o Under $10,000: 29% o $10,000-$30,000: 28% o $31,000-$50,000: 12% o Over $50,000: 11% o Not Working: 20% Bus Fare Categories o General: 69% o Youth: 10% o Disabled: 11% o Senior: 10% Number of Buses Used for Trip 72% of those surveyed used one bus to their end destination; 25% transferred 1 or 2 times; and remaining 3% transferred 3 or more times. Frequency of Use per Week o 5 or more days: 56% o 3-4 days: 24% o 1-2 days: 12% o Less than 1/week: 8% Customer Origins and Destinations o Home -Work Trips: 42% o Home -Social Trips: 11% o Home -Retail Trips: 9% o Home -School Trips: 8% o Home -Medical Trips: 6% o Home -Other: 24% Primary Language o English: 83% o Spanish: 16% o Other: 1% Automobile Ownership o No: 75% o Yes: 25% Source: RTA Title VI Report (2010) 3 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Demographic Projections Demographic projections directly correlate to the allocation of future transit services. Demographic data such as population, employment, urban density, income levels, age distributions, and even legislative policies are the primary variables that shape public transit in a community. Growth projections for the region are compiled by SCAG and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) in collaboration with local jurisdictions. At the local level, jurisdictions have the ability to plan and revise land use and transportation characteristics to target a desired level of intensity for employment, housing, and commercial areas. RTA monitors demographic changes in the service area through data gathered from the US Census, California Department of Finance, SCAG, WRCOG, and other entities. Demographic trends indicate the following: • The largest population growth areas are in Eastvale, Banning -Beaumont, Hemet -San Jacinto, and Menifee. • The highest employment growth is anticipated in the Hemet -San Jacinto and Banning - Beaumont areas. • The job -worker balance is expected to improve as more employment opportunities are fostered resulting in a higher proportion of trips within western Riverside County. However, commute patterns to neighboring counties are still expected to grow as well. • Urban intensification/densification is projected to be the most noticeable in the Corona - Riverside -Moreno Valley corridor, as well as the Murrieta-Temecula area surrounding the junction of the Interstate 15 and 215 freeways. • Income levels, age distributions, and vehicle ownership were also profiled to provide an indication of transit needs. Communities with higher retirement populations (Menifee, Hemet -San Jacinto, and Banning -Beaumont) and higher proportion of families with children (Moreno Valley, Perris, and Lake Elsinore) are projected to develop larger employment bases and population growth as a result of younger families taking advantage of the lower housing costs. • Communities that are more diverse and established with mixed age groups and household types, such as Riverside and Corona, present more possibilities for increasing choice riders. These projections will be reevaluated with the COA. 4 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry 1.3 FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES RTA operates 36 regional, local, rural, and trolley service routes and eight CommuterLink express routes. Routes in higher density urban areas with greater peak ridership are usually operated with larger vehicles, while routes in suburban and rural areas with lower ridership are usually operated with smaller to medium sized vehicles. Refer to Table 3A for a complete listing of both directly operated and contract operated routes. Fixed Route Services A fixed route is a bus line that provides regularly scheduled service. RTA fixed routes may be categorized into five basic types: Regional Routes: These routes comprise the backbone of the network between metropolitan areas along primary corridors. They may utilize the freeway system to travel between communities and it is not uncommon for regional service to travel through non -urban areas to link two urban areas. Local Routes: These supplement regional routes by circulating through various neighborhoods and serving secondary corridors. Local routes also serve as feeders to regional and express routes by transporting customers within a community on shorter trips. Bus stop spacing is on average % mile apart, where curb and gutter improvements permit. Rural Routes: These provide lifeline service that feeds regional routes. Rural routes are generally limited in operation and serve secondary corridors within non -urbanized areas. Given the growth of western Riverside County, rural route service is limited primarily to segments of Regional route service and less -populated areas between cities. Trolley Routes and Special Service: These are intended to meet the needs of a specific market or community and often are designed as a circulator to serve targeted affinity groups with common travel patterns. Regional Express Routes: These routes provide limited -stop service designed primarily to transport commuters over long distances to and from employment sites and provide connectivity to transit operations heading outside of western Riverside County such as Metrolink. Labeled as CommuterLink, these buses employ the freeway system to provide faster service and include customer amenities such as free Wi-Fi service. 5 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry Paratransit Services RTA offers paratransit services known as "Dial -A -Ride" (DAR) to seniors (age 65 and above) and persons with disabilities. DAR is an origin -to -destination advanced reservation transportation service that travels to areas within three-quarters of a mile of an RTA fixed route, excluding express services. These areas are referred to as the "Dial -A -Ride service area" and trips must begin and end in the service area. If the trip starts or ends outside the service area, passengers must find a safe place within the service area to be picked up and dropped off to be eligible for service. DAR service is provided at times equivalent to local fixed route bus service in the area. RTA has two types of DAR service: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Priority DAR Service RTA gives priority service to individuals who are certified under ADA law. Persons who are ADA certified are eligible for trips throughout the RTA service area that are within three-quarters of a mile of a fixed route bus service, excluding express routes, and during the hours of bus service operation. Senior/Disabled DAR Service Seniors age 65 and above and persons with disabilities are eligible for local DAR service within a single city and within three-quarters of a mile during the hours of fixed route bus service operation, excluding express service. Transportation is provided only within the city in which the trip begins. Consolidated Transportation Services Agency RTA is one of two designated Consolidated Transportation Services Agencies (CTSA) in Riverside County, the other being SunLine Transit Agency in the Coachella Valley. RTA's role as a CTSA is to assist RCTC in coordinating public transit throughout the approximate 2,500-square-mile service area; provide driver training and technical workshops; and assist with preparing grant applications. In the cities of Corona, Beaumont and Banning, RTA coordinates regional services with the Corona Cruiser and Pass Transit. In the City of Riverside, RTA coordinates with Riverside Special Services, which provides complementary ADA compliant service to RTA's fixed routes. Additionally, RTA staff periodically meets with social service providers, bus riders, and other advocates through forums such as RCTC's Citizens Advisory Committee, RTA's quarterly ADA meetings, Transportation Now (T-NOW) committees, and surrounding regional transit operators. As the CTSA and a federal grantee, RTA receives FTA funds directly and is responsible for the provision and compliance of sub -recipients adhering to federal regulations and policies. RTA is assisting sub -recipients throughout western Riverside County with federal funds through the 6 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry FTA Sections 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and 5317 New Freedom (NF) Programs. The sub -recipients will continue to be assisted in FY14 as awarded through RCTC's Specialized Transit Call for Projects or until previous funds are expended. New funds for FY14 are subject to resolution of 13(c). The following is a list of the sub -recipients and approved projects: • Care Connexxus, Inc. — Driver Sensitivity Training • Riverside County Regional Medical Center — Medical Transport The FTA funds will be administered by RTA, with RCTC providing the local match funds. These programs include specialized public transportation initiatives that are targeted to assist low income individuals, seniors, and persons with disabilities who require support beyond conventional public transit services to maintain their independence and mobility. 1.4 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE In March 2009, a fare study was completed, resulting in the following fare structure approved and adopted by the Board of Directors which took effect June 28, 2009. A review of the current fare structure is anticipated over the next two years. FIXED -ROUTE FARES Fare Categories General Youth (grades 1-12)** Senior/Disabled** Medicare Card Holder Child (46" tall or under) Base Fares $1.50 $1.50 70C 70C 25C Day Pass* $4 $4 $2 $2 N/A 7-Day Pass* $16 $16 $16 $16 N/A 30-Day Pass* $50 $35 $23 $23 N/A COMMUTERLINK FARES COMMUTERLINK+ LOCAL Fare Categories General Youth (grades 1-12)** Senior/Disabled** Medicare Card Holder Child (46" tall or under) Base Fares $3 $3 $2 $2 $2 Day Passes $7 $7 $5 $5 N/A 30-Day Pass $75 $75 $50 $50 N/A DIAL -A -RIDE FARES I Not accepted on fixed route buses Fare Categories Senior/Disabled Medicare Card Holder Child (46" tall or under) Base Fares $3 $3 50C 10-Ticket Books $30 $30 N/A *Accepted as base fare. CommuterLink trips require an additional $1.30 (Senior/Disabled/Medicare) or $1.50 (General/Youth) per trip.** Proper identification is required at time of boarding. 7 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Cooperative Fare and Subsidy Programs RTA makes every effort to create partnerships that will improve service for customers by simplifying transfer agreements and developing fare programs that promote the use of public transit. RTA has transfer agreements with the following agencies: Metrolink, Omnitrans, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Corona Cruiser, and Pass Transit. Metrolink tickets and passes are accepted on RTA fixed routes that serve Metrolink stations during the period from one hour before to one hour after Metrolink's service hours and are valid on the day of travel. Fare media from Omnitrans, Corona Cruiser, and Pass Transit are accepted at transfer locations at the equivalent base fare rate, excluding CommuterLink service, on the day of travel. OCTA fare media is accepted for base fare on CommuterLink Route 216 at transfer locations in Orange County as well as La Sierra Metrolink between RTA Route 15 and OCTA Route 794. Current and retired employees as well as dependents of Omnitrans and OCTA are eligible to ride any local fixed route or CommuterLink in the RTA service area. RTA currently operates various cooperative fare and subsidy programs including: • University of California, Riverside - U-Pass Program, Route 51 Crest Cruiser • Riverside City College - Go -Pass Program • La Sierra University - U-Pass Program • California Baptist University - U-Pass Program • Mount San Jacinto College - Go -Pass Program • City of Riverside - City Pass for Employees • City of Temecula - Route 55 Temecula Trolley • County of Riverside - Route 50Jury Trolley • RCTC - Route 54 County Administrative Center/ Commerce St. Metrolink Parking Lot College and university programs allow students with a valid identification card from these campuses to receive unlimited access to any of RTA's fixed routes. These programs are funded by the institution or students. The City of Riverside subsidizes a fare program (City Pass) for its employees to ride the bus for free and serves as a pass outlet (Riverside Go Transit) for its residents by discounting 20 to 30 percent off on 7-day and 30-day passes, respectively. Other subsidized transit services include the trolley and circular routes which are funded by the university or local jurisdictions. 8 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry 1.5 REVENUE FLEET As of March 2013, RTA has a total fleet size of 173 vehicles for its fixed route services. The bus types consist of 94 Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)-powered 40-ft. buses currently used for directly operated fixed routes; 79 smaller buses for contracted fixed routes which consist of 14 CNG 32-ft. buses; 55 Type II and VII vehicles; and 10 trolleys. RTA also has an additional 88 vehicles for operation of paratransit services, for a total of 261 revenue service vehicles. Refer to Table 1 for a detailed inventory of the RTA fleet. The CNG 40-ft. buses used on directly operated routes generally cover more densely populated areas such as Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley, and Perris while the 32-ft. CNG buses and 28-ft. gasoline powered buses are typically used as local and express vehicles on contract operated fixed routes in less dense communities. All RTA vehicles comply with clean fuel policies and come fully equipped with ADA accessible wheelchair lifts, including the paratransit vans. In addition, all fixed route vehicles are equipped with bicycle racks. In FY14, the directly operated service peak requirement is expected to remain the same with 68 buses at peak for local routes and 12 buses for CommuterLink routes. Replacement of the 94 40-ft. CNG vehicles will by completed in FY14. The contract operated peak requirement is also expected to remain about constant with 49 buses for local routes and 16 buses for CommuterLink routes. 1.6 EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES Operational Facilities RTA's primary facility is located in the City of Riverside and houses the Administration, Operations, and Maintenance departments with approximately 313 active employees on site. RTA's secondary facility, located in Hemet, opened in June 2000. It now has approximately 56 Maintenance and Operations employees assigned to the division. The Hemet facility is utilized for routes in the southern portion of the service area and maintains a portion of the CNG vehicle fleet. An analysis is currently underway as part of the current COA study to evaluate the relocation of the operational and administrative facilities to a location that is more centralized and has the capacity to meet future growth impacts. Included will be an assessment of three site alternatives in the March Joint Powers Authority (March JPA) area. In FY14, RTA's contracted fixed route service will continue to be provided by Empire Transportation, who operates from a facility in Perris. DAR service, currently provided by Southland Transit, will be re -procured during FY14 and awarded to a new contractor. Both contracts (fixed route and DAR) are responsible for housing, operating, and maintaining RTA vehicles. The DAR facility, currently also located in Perris, houses the DAR reservation call center. RTA offers taxi overflow through Network Paratransit. 9 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riverside Transit Agency Facility Modernization RTA is a recipient of Proposition 1B funds, known as "The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006." Proposition 1B sets aside funds for two transportation improvement purposes: (1) Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) to fund capital projects that relate to infrastructure improvement and (2) California Transit Security Grant Program -California Transit Assistance Fund (CTSGP-CTAF) for transit system safety, security and disaster response capital projects. Completed projects include enhancements to the safety and security of operational and maintenance facilities, such as: • Security Lighting Upgrades • Walls and Fencing • Security Signage • Fire Alarm Enhancements • Facility Video Surveillance • Epoxy Shop Floor • Emergency Supplies • Threat & Vulnerability Assessment • Vehicle Surveillance System In October 2011, RTA was also notified to receive funds under the FTA State of Good Repair (SGR) Bus and Bus Facilities Discretionary Program. Funding of $1.3 million has been allocated towards facility rehabilitation needs for the Riverside and Hemet divisions. Rehabilitation projects such as painting, flooring, and roofing have been completed; while other projects such as the underground storage tank and concrete pavement work are underway. 10 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riuersfde Tra nsft Agency CHAPTER 2: ROUTE PERFORMANCE & EXISTING SERVICE 2.1 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RTA evaluates and plans for its services using RTA adopted Service Standards and Warrants metrics and those set by RCTC's Productivity Improvement Program (PIP), which are both updated annually. Service Standards and Warrants Service Standards and Warrants were adopted in 2009 and are reviewed regularly to set the requirements for a minimum level of service that respects service quality design characteristics such as route structure, service area coverage, operating hours, and on -time performance. Since then, economic conditions have changed requiring that the standards be revised to maintain service stability. The same standards for considering service enhancements also provides an objective way to evaluate how fair and balanced service changes can be made. There are several factors that are typically considered when objectively measuring service performance. These factors, used in conjunction with the PIP measurements, help determine whether service is cost effective. Summary of Service Standards and Warrants Population Density Density is determined by the number of people housed per square mile or the number of employees per square mile. RTA aims to serve at least 85% of all residences, places of work, high schools, colleges, and shopping centers with access to bus service. Route Classifications RTA service can be classified into five fixed route categories — regional, local, rural, trolley/special, and express. Complementary to the fixed route service is Dial -A -Ride. See Table 3A for the route classification of each route. Span of Service The span of service, the hours of operation, refers to the start and end time of a route. Depending on the route structure (i.e., regional, local, rural, express), the span of service will vary based on the demand in the community. 11 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riverside Transit Agency Bus Stop Spacing Depending on the population density, bus stop spacing in urban areas usually averages about 1,500 ft. (.28 miles) to 2,500 ft. (.47 miles). As service approaches more suburban and rural areas, bus stop spacing may be limited to locations with accessible curb and gutters and sidewalks suitable for ADA compliance. On -Time Performance RTA requires that no bus shall leave a time point early, and should arrive at a time point no later than 6 minutes after the scheduled arrival time. This limit is appropriate for RTA's service area due to the average distance traveled by each route and the combined rural and urban areas. Headways (Frequency) Headways are the timed intervals between each scheduled trip within a fixed route bus (e.g., the bus runs every 30 minutes). Headways range anywhere from every 20 minutes to every 120 minutes, depending on the density, and are aimed at operating in 20 minute increments for local, regional, and rural routes. Express and trolley routes may vary depending on demand. Transfer Wait Time In more urbanized areas such as downtown Riverside, transfer wait times will not be longer than approximately 20 minutes. In smaller urbanized and even in rural areas, the transfer wait time can reach up to 30 to 45 minutes depending on the frequencies of the routes in the area. Load Factor (Maximum Vehicle Loads) Depending on the bus, the maximum number of passengers should not exceed 150% of the seating capacity or the legal weight limit of the bus. Dial -A -Ride vehicles should not exceed 100% of the seated capacity. Source: RTA Service Standards and Warrants (2012) Productivity vs. Coverage Target To help improve effectiveness and efficiency, RTA sets a target for the productivity level of service to operate. In order to meet productivity requirements, while continuing to provide coverage to areas that would not be served if performance were the only factor, RTA has adopted standards requiring 60% of their fixed route service to perform up to productivity standards while the remaining 40% of fixed routes operate to maintain coverage. This means that service that exceeds performance standards enable a minimal level of operations in areas of need that do not meet performance standards. Given RTA's diverse and widespread service area, there are places that are being served based on the need to provide coverage. 12 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry The 60/40 split establishes a benchmark for productive service to meet mandatory farebox recovery. However, it also allows for new service to be implemented following Transportation Development Act (TDA) guidelines for exemption based on performance standards within the year the service was implemented and the following two fiscal years. This objective also enables RTA to maintain highly productive service and still meet the requirements of Title VI. It is the policy of RTA to ensure compliance with Title VI so that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any transit program or activity. New Service Warrants The Service Standards and Warrants are used as a guide for the implementation of new service. PIP targets are updated annually and new service can be exempted from meeting the required criteria for up to two years plus the year of commencement. New service is evaluated during this initial period using the PIP and service standards. The objective is to give a route time to perform up to standards, or it may be discontinued. Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) Service productivity is measured against the PIP metrics implemented by RCTC in September 2005. Using the PIP as a guide, transit operators in Riverside County develop targets and corresponding budgets using the following performance indicators: • Farebox Recovery Ratio • Cost Per Revenue Hour • Subsidy Per Passenger • Subsidy Per Passenger Mile • Subsidy Per Revenue Hour • Subsidy Per Revenue Mile • Passengers Per Revenue Hour • Passengers Per Revenue Mile The majority of PIP targets are established based on actual current fiscal year performance through the third quarter, with minor adjustments. The Cost Per Revenue Hour target is set by taking actual current fiscal year performance through the third quarter and multiplying it by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from the end of the previous fiscal year. The Farebox Recovery Ratio target is set based on the projected budget for the succeeding fiscal year and consideration of the urban (20%)/rural (10%) service offering. The Farebox Recovery Ratio for 13 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 DAR is set at 10%. All remaining targets are set on a plus or minus 15% of the current fiscal year actual performance through the third quarter. PIP implementation policies require mandatory compliance for the Farebox Recovery Ratio target plus attainment of at least four of the seven remaining discretionary indicators. For FY14, RTA is budgeted to meet or exceed the mandatory Farebox Recovery Ratio target and will meet two of the seven discretionary performance indicators at the system -wide level. PIP Indicators Systemwide Systemwide FY13 FY14 YTD March Proposed Target Low End High End Fa rebox Recovery Ratio Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Subsidy Per Passenger Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Subsidy Per Revenue Hour Subsidy Per Revenue Mile Passengers Per Revenue Hour Passengers Per Revenue Mile 30.76% $79.72 $3.97 $ 0.5 7 $55.20 $3.43 13.91 0.87 22.88% $87.02 $5.20 $0.74 $67.11 $4.15 12.92 0.80 17.55% $81.49 $3.37 $4.57 $0.48 $0.66 $46.92 $63.48 $2.92 $3.94 11.82 16.00 0.74 1.00 The indicators not expected to be met based on the proposed budget are: Cost Per Revenue Hour; Subsidy Per Passenger; Subsidy Per Passenger Mile; Subsidy per Revenue Service Hour; and, Subsidy per Revenue Service Mile. An explanation for the targets budgeted not to be achieved follows. The Cost Per Revenue Hour target is based on a Consumer Price Index (CPI) rate of 2.22%. Total operating costs are budgeted to increase over 5% over FY13 budget due to several factors exceeding the 2.22% CPI growth including salaries and wages for both administrative and represented employees; benefits — including Other Post -Employment Benefits — Annual Required Contribution (OPEB ARC); services; insurance; and revenue hours increasing by 5%. The PIP metrics that consider subsidy allow for a 15% increase over current fiscal year third quarter performance. The FY14 budgeted subsidy is planned at a 26% increase over current FY13 levels. While passengers are budgeted to increase approximately 2%, revenue hours are budgeted to increase 5%. The key driver in the target setting is based on RTA's fiscal year-to- date financial performance, which has been outstanding. RTA is on pace to set another ridership record while achieving excellent cost performance. As such, targets are being established on performance that should not be assumed to be repeated in an environment of modest service expansion and moderately improving economic conditions — which are driving many cost variables to grow greater than CPI. 14 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry The following table is a summary of the major budget changes from FY13 to FY14. The increase in salaries and benefits over FY13 budget is due to increased medical, pension and General Accounting Standards Board — Other Post -Employment Benefits (GASB OPEB) expenses, as well as the addition of 2 new administrative positions. Purchased transportation growth, which is the cost of contracted service, is attributed to established contract rate increases and higher fuel costs. Other growth includes, but is not limited to insurance and bus branding. FY13 Budget $ 58,073,068 Budget Changes from FY13 Salaries & Benefits $ 1,952,476 Purchased Transportation (rates, fuel) 769,200 Comprehensive Operational Analysis 85,000 Bus Branding 358,500 Other Expenses (56,402) Total Increases $ 3,108,774 FY14 Proposed Budget $ 61,181,842 2.2 EXISTING FIXED ROUTE & DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE In FY13, RTA budgeted just over 669,000 revenue hours for the operation of 11.2 million revenue miles system -wide. Total revenue hours budgeted was 473,978 for fixed routes and 195,758 for DAR. Total revenue miles included 7.3 million for fixed routes and 3.9 million for DAR. Passenger growth has far exceeded projections in recent years due to significant increases in pass programs, customer satisfaction, rising gasoline prices, a higher unemployment rate, and slowly improving economy. These factors, as well as other service efficiencies made in prior years, have spiked ridership and passengers per hour have continually increased. Growth has been most evident on fixed routes. System -wide passengers are projected to reach an all-time high in FY13 with approximately 8.8 million boardings and are estimated to increase slightly in FY14. 15 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 2.3 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS Since the height of the recession when revenues declined, RTA has been able to balance its budget by concentrating service reductions and modifications on routes that are not meeting performance measures -namely farebox recovery and passengers per hour. These two measurements are key factors in evaluating underperforming service. Performance evaluation directs staff to research and analyze unproductive routes more closely to determine whether segments or trips can be eliminated due to low ridership. This process has proven to be beneficial because it streamlines services, reduces expenses, and has the least impact on customers. 2.4 TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROWTH MARKETS While RTA services are expanding among the public in general, continued efforts are made to increase and expand its commuter services as a market segment. Many customers value the amenities provided on CommuterLink routes such as the upholstered seating and Wi-Fi. To expand on this market base, RTA continually monitors capacity on express routes to foster growth with additional trips or larger vehicles. Another growth area is high school and college students. RTA is committed to working with school districts, colleges and universities to improve access to public transit. For high schools, RTA compiles and updates a database containing information on facility locations, bell schedules and district boundaries for routing and scheduling purposes. At the college level, RTA continues to develop and build relationships with college and university officials to improve transportation for their students. Community routes such as circulators have also proven to be successful in some areas where density levels are higher and connectivity is provided to key trip destinations such as business and educational facilities and commercial/retail centers. Examples of these include Route 11 in Moreno Valley and Route 55 in Temecula, both of which are highly productive. As densities increase and communities are developed further, RTA will continue to work with local jurisdictions to create similarly viable transit options. 2.5 TRANSIT CENTERS, EQUIPMENT AND PASSENGER AMENITIES RTA seeks and receives a variety of funds to finance capital projects that enhance services for passengers. Capital projects are typically funded with approximately 20% coming from local sources such as TDA, Measure A, or Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) while 80% is paid for with federal grants. 16 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry Passenger Transit Facilities Transit facilities provide more than just a bus transfer stop. They can be community -centered, multi -modal facilities where bus and rail passengers benefit from a selection of mobility choices. These modes of travel can include single -occupancy vehicles, carpools, vanpools, bicycles, pedestrian walkways, local and commuter express buses, light rail, and regional rail networks. Transit centers are generally owned by various public agencies and are well -situated for advancement of public -private investment partnerships leading to "transit -oriented" commercial and residential development. The following is a summary of the existing and planned transit facilities in the RTA service area: Perris Station Transit Center: Completed in January 2010, this transit center is located in the City of Perris at C St. and 4th St. (State Route 74) and has eight bus bays for bus service and is served by seven RTA routes. The facility will ultimately facilitate multi - modal transfers between Metrolink, RTA local and express routes, and park -and -ride patrons for the southwest region. Corona Transit Center: The transit center was opened in September 2010 and is located off Grand Blvd. and North Main St. and includes eight bus bays and a pedestrian bridge across the railroad tracks for direct access to Metrolink. Total project cost came under $8.0 million including the final engineering and design and extension of the pedestrian bridge. Downtown Riverside Transit Center: The current transit center is located between Fairmont Blvd. and Market St. off of University Ave. and Mission Inn Ave. RTA is working with the City of Riverside to evaluate other locations, such as a site off of Vine St. or in the March JPA jurisdiction. The current transit center has eight bus bays, but relocation or renovation is expected to feature about 12 to 14 bus bays to serve as a primary 17 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 connecting point for RTA's regional and local routes and future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service. A feasibility analysis is currently underway within the COA study that will provide recommendations on a potential site with consideration of current and future growth impacts. The total project is estimated to cost $7.5 million and will be funded by TUMF, TDA, and federal funds. Twin Cities Transit Center: A site feasibility study is currently underway and is anticipated to be completed in 2014. The study will analyze proposed locations near the Temecula and Murrieta city boundaries for a facility that will feature 10 to 14 bus bays. The transit center will be a robust marshaling site for vanpools and regional express and local routes. BRT service from San Diego will also be considered to transport the large volume of commuters destined for San Diego County employment centers. Total cost for the site feasibility study is roughly $365,000. Hemet Transit Facility: A site feasibility study is anticipated to begin in FY14 and is expected to be completed in 2014. The intent of the study is to evaluate sites that are highly visible and convenient for bus service in the city of Hemet. The facility will feature 2 to 4 bus bays and other passenger amenities. The goal of the study is to assess operational impacts, develop recommendations, formulate initial cost estimates and identify environmental impacts. A total of approximately $100,000 has been budgeted for the site feasibility study. Additional transit centers and smaller transfer nodes are being considered by RTA as needed to accommodate additional Metrolink commuter rail stations along the future Perris Valley Line. Other locations along the Perris Valley Line that are being considered include the Hunter Park Station, Moreno Valley -March Station, and South Perris Station. RTA will continue to work with RCTC on creating multi -modal stations that will create transportation hubs that meet the capacity for transit service. The California High -Speed Rail (HSR) Authority has been in contact with RTA to coordinate early design concepts for potential bus connectivity. The HSR route will either travel through Riverside and Murrieta via 1-215 or through Corona and Murrieta via 1-15. Depending on the final design, passenger stations are contemplated for undetermined locations in Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley or the March JPA area and also near the Murrieta-Temecula interface. RTA will serve in an advisory capacity with HSR engineers to ensure that safe and convenient across -the -platform access between the rail line and the bus lines is provided. Station funding sources have not yet been identified. Other local transit centers and transfer nodes around the RTA service area will be considered as community -centered residential and employment densities increase and the need for centralized bus marshaling and transfer facilities become evident. RTA will partner with state, 18 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 regional, county, and local planning agencies, as well as the private sector, to coordinate the design, funding, and construction of these sites. Equipment and Passenger Amenities Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) In 2008, RTA launched the ITS project on its directly operated buses, which makes up about 60% of RTA's fleet. The ITS network brings functionalities that improve the operational workflow, both internally and externally. Sophisticated Automatic Vehicle Locator programs allow the bus Dispatch Center to track the location of every 40-ft. bus for schedule adherence. This feature greatly enhances schedule performance and monitoring of ridership patterns. The next phase of ITS will include next generation technology and the expansion to contract operated fixed route services and upgrade of ITS for directly operated fixed route services, creating a single ITS program for all RTA fixed route services. This is anticipated to be fully operational by FY15. Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) RTA has also introduced the ATIS technology with digital kiosks, known as SmartStops, which relay real-time arrival information on display at major transfer points. Currently, SmartStops are installed at heavily used bus stops in the cities of Riverside, Perris, Moreno Valley, and Corona. The next phase of the ATIS project will include querying and alerting of bus arrivals via text messaging, which will be completed concurrent with the upgraded ITS program. Mobile application development is also part of this project, which will allow passengers to look up real- time arrival information for all RTA fixed routes. 19 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 The SmartStop technology is coupled with additional plans to continue an aggressive program to enhance transit amenities. Existing shelters are continuously refurbished and new benches, trash receptacles and kiosks have also been placed at many existing bus stops. Newer bus benches are designed to be graffiti resistant and discourage loitering. Furthermore, over 450 new bus turnouts have been installed since 2003 as a result of staff coordination with local developers. Transit5ignal Priority (TSP) Future bus schedules will further benefit from enhanced signal priority technology planned for BRT service. A transmitter from the vehicle will allow the traffic signals along major streets to remain in "green" mode at busy intersections for several seconds longer, therefore allowing a late running bus to advance more quickly along its route to maintain on -time performance. RTA is working with the City of Riverside on a demonstration program on the University Ave. and Magnolia Ave. corridors. This project is currently underway. Illuminated Bus Stops In FY11, RTA purchased materials and supplies to expand and upgrade the bus stop system with additional security -enhancing illuminated bus stop devices which come equipped with downlighting. These features are push-button activated by the customer and allow drivers to recognize when a person is waiting at a bus stop at night. The downlighting safety feature and illuminated schedule provides bus scheduling information for easy visibility in a night time environment. Funding for the illuminated bus stops was received from Section 5311 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. Over 30 bus stops in the system have received these devices. On -Board Security Cameras RTA utilized $60,000 from Proposition 1B funds to add exterior side video cameras on all full- sized buses to enhance the Agency's ability to monitor and record activities occurring around the vehicles. These additional cameras have enhanced RTA's ability to investigate crimes and suspicious activities occurring at bus stops, transit centers and during travel on the road. The cameras provide a view of the street and all activities near the bus. When reports of crime or suspicious activities are received, RTA is able to aid law enforcement authorities by downloading the video which can be invaluable to the investigation and any subsequent prosecution. Revenue Collection Devices Since 2010, the contracted fixed route vehicles were installed with electronic registering fareboxes, replacing old manual fareboxes. The upgraded fareboxes increase revenue collection processing, decrease staff time in reconciling revenue, enhance ridership category counts and provide greater passenger convenience by issuing day passes automatically. The project cost reached $800,000 and was funded by Proposition 113. 20 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry Bus Replacement Program The directly operated fleet has a Bus Replacement Program that includes the purchase of 94 new 40-ft CNG replacement buses for fixed routes. RTA's CNG buses, purchased in 2001 and 2002, have reached the end of their useful lives as defined by the FTA. Replacing the aging buses is critical in assuring the reliability of service and decreasing maintenance costs by reducing breakdowns and frequent repairs. The replacement buses, manufactured by Gillig, Inc., will be powered by CNG and have state-of-the-art technologies to provide enhanced passenger safety, better fuel efficiency and decreased emissions. The replacement of these vehicles is funded through Local Transportation Funds (LTF), State Transit Assistance (STA), Proposition 1B, and federal appropriations and grants. Delivery of the 94 replacement vehicles and three (3) expansion vehicles will begin in October 2013 and is anticipated to be finalized by spring 2014. The contract operated fixed -route fleet was expanded in 2008 with the purchase of 19 Type VII vehicles which seat 26 passengers compared to the previous Type II vehicles being used which seat 12 passengers. In FY13, the expansion continued with the purchase of 21 Type VII vehicles, which seat 27 passengers. These vehicles replaced 11 Type II vehicles that seat 12 passengers, and 10 CommuterLink vehicles that have reached the end of their useful life. Funding for these replacements will come from FTA Section 5307, Proposition 1B, and STA for a total estimated cost of $3.1 million. The DAR fleet was updated in FY13 with 38 new 12 passenger Type II vehicles to replace similar units that reached the end of their useful life in FY13. Funding for these vehicles was provided by FTA Sections 5307 and 5309, LTF, and STA for a total amount of about $2.5 million. Bus Stop Amenities and Upgrades Bus stop amenities such as shelters, bus stop signs, benches, and trash receptacles will continue to be placed at the approximately 3,000 bus stops in the service area as is feasible. A priority list is based on ridership and safety criteria. RTA works with local jurisdictions to convert as many bus stops as possible to ADA-compliant status. Funds for a Bus Stop Upgrade Program are being sought from TUMF, STA, and federal appropriations. The project will include the installation of cement pads to make stops accessible for riders with disabilities, shelters for security and protection from the elements, and benches for passenger comfort. These upgrades will not only benefit current riders but will also serve as strong incentives for discretionary riders to adopt public transit as a mode of travel. 21 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry CHAPTER 3: PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES Service plans in recent years have concentrated on four core areas of improvement: 1. Headways & Connectivity — Ridership and customer survey data were used to improve clock -face scheduling, frequencies, and connections between routes. 2. Streamlining — Changes focused on routing on major streets and corridors to reduce circuitous routing, duplication of service, and to improve connectivity to other routes and major trip generators. 3. Capacity Constraints — Trips with overloads and capacity constraints were monitored closely to identify routes and areas with growth potential and ridership demand. 4. Communities — Efforts were made to accommodate growth and sustainable service in certain areas as a result of new housing and commercial developments, ridership near schools, and community facilities. Economic conditions have played a pivotal role in service planning, thus limiting the amount of major service enhancements and expansions of service. 3.2 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES An updated COA study was kicked off in January 2013 and is currently underway. Recommendations from the study will be finalized by summer 2014 and service planning for the next three years will primarily be modeled after recommended strategies from the COA provided that the financial situation can accommodate them. Additional recommendations may be derived from other sources such as transit center site feasibility studies, customer comments, coach operator feedback, public surveys, and other agencies or organization actions. The COA is set forth to meet the following objectives: • Complete a comprehensive analysis of the transit service provided — from service at each stop to examining the efficiency, logical construction, and ability to meet local and regional travel patterns. • Examine the existing and potential markets for transit services that will help increase ridership, farebox recovery, and market share. • Provide strategic plans for short-term and long-term planning initiatives that are sustainable both operationally and financially. • Develop a plan in alignment with policy initiatives that look to reduce vehicle emissions where mass transit can be shown to contribute significantly towards that achievement. 22 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry • Prioritize transit capital needs such as fleet replacement, fleet expansion, technology and facility upgrades. Major service modifications are not anticipated until findings from the COA study are completed; however, capacity building efforts on routes and in service areas exhibiting high ridership growth will continue. Proposed changes beginning in FY14 include the following: ➢ Route and Schedule Maintenance — Includes routine schedule adherence analysis, minor route restructuring, addressing capacity constraints with larger vehicles, and time adjustments for connections. o Route 14 — One scheduled vehicle assigned to this route due to a long-term construction detour will be moved upon project completion to the Route 1 to address ridership growth beginning January 2014. o Route 19 — Routing will be adjusted to serve the Perris Fairgrounds on weekends and during the week of the Southern California Fair. o Route 21 — One scheduled vehicle currently contract -operated will be moved to direct operations beginning May 2013 to address capacity and wheelchair constraints. o Route 54 — Will be expanded to operate on Fridays beginning July 2013. ➢ Reinstatement of three (3) major holidays — Memorial Day, Independence Day, and Labor Day are proposed to be reinstated beginning September 2013. ➢ Later Service — Demand for later service has been on the rise. Later service on major regional and local routes is planned over the course of the next three years but will begin with routes that serve major destinations such as large employment centers and colleges and universities. In FY14, this will include routes 1, 15, 16, 18, 20, 31, and 32. Pending future revenue scenarios, other potential service changes for FY15 and FY16 will incorporate results from the COA and are likely to include enhancements focusing on improving capacity and connectivity, and meeting demand on routes impacted by substantial growth. Such enhancements could include improving frequencies on routes over 60 minutes or expanding weekend service on routes that will complete the backbone of the network to close gaps between sub -areas. 3.3 MODIFICATIONS TO PARATRANSIT SERVICE The provision of ADA services remains a challenge as service requests continue to increase and the number of ADA-eligible riders continues to grow. A DAR Study was completed in 2009 and, as a result, in September 2009, the Board of Directors authorized the implementation of several policy changes that took effect in January 2010. The study found that from FY06 to FY09, DAR ridership grew 66%, a stark contrast from the fixed route ridership which only grew 21% during the same time period. The study correlated that this disparity was due in part to the maturing 23 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry of the "baby -boomer" generation requiring paratransit services. Following the approved policy changes, ridership growth slowed, and current FY13 projections show an increase over FY12 of just under 5%, compared to the 14% growth originally projected. Further efforts to mitigate the increasing expenses in DAR service included the launch of a Senior/Disabled Travel Training Program and the establishment of a Medi-Cal Reimbursement Program. The Senior/Disabled Travel Training Program commenced in fall 2011 and covers all aspects of public transit from training on how to use a bus schedule and map to overcoming physical and social barriers that may prevent passengers from using a fixed route bus. Participants benefit by developing a greater level of independence and increased mobility; ultimately bringing significant financial savings to both the customer and RTA. During the first 16 months of the program, participants took more than 30,000 trips on fixed route buses. The program has been so successful, it was recognized by the SCAG as a recipient of the 2013 Compass Blueprint Recognition Award. The Medi-Cal Reimbursement Program was implemented in early 2012 and was developed in cooperation with the State Medi-Cal Program for paratransit trips taken to and from qualifying medical services. This program provides reimbursement of 50% of the net expenses associated with these trips and provides access to alternative sources of State and Federal funding for DAR services. Eligible expenses for FY13 under this program are projected to be nearly $600,000. 3.4 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION A marketing and communications plan is developed to support the annual goals of RTA, while advancing the mission and vision of the organization. The plan seeks to address the following focus areas: • Increasing ridership • Increasing awareness of RTA services • Enhancing the image of RTA • Educating the public on the benefits of public transportation • Providing excellent customer service • Coordinating media and public relations • Government Relations • Assisting with employee communications Addressing these areas is accomplished by executing marketing and communication programs or campaigns targeted at existing and potential riders, commuters, the general public, elected officials, students, the business community, the media, non-profit organizations and employees. These programs/campaigns employ a mix of different media to reach the desired audiences. Marketing efforts aim to build on the existing base of awareness by educating the 24 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 general public about what transit services are available, and how and where to get more information. Service Adjustments Marketing promotes information regarding service adjustments through a variety of advertising methods to reach customers including rider alerts, press releases, website, brochures distributed throughout the service area, newspaper ads, on -bus information, and social media. Customer Information Materials RTA aims to make the transit system easier to understand and use through enhanced passenger information and signage. Materials are developed for both novice riders and experienced users to read and understand. Informational documents are readily available and designed to attractively promote RTA services to someone new trying the system, while maintaining interest and engagement from existing riders. Public Speaking Opportunities Presentations are customized for a variety of market segments. Outreach to business and community leaders is used to educate these groups about the economic benefits that transit provides to the RTA community, while presentations for social service agencies or other gatekeeper organizations are tailored to educate these groups on how transit can enhance personal mobility and how they can help to promote its usage. Presentations also occur at senior centers, colleges, and school orientation programs and focus on how those populations can use the bus to accomplish their various tasks. Community Relations Many of RTA's strategies rely on working through local organizations and businesses to direct very specific promotional messages to constituencies with realistic potential for using RTA's transit services. Community -based marketing and partnerships with local businesses and public agencies of this kind are cost-effective. One way RTA builds upon these relationships is by participating in community events such as parades, which provides the opportunity to attract potential new users and also promotes RTA as an active community partner. Website and Social Media RTA's website is used to publish up-to-date information about agency services, policies, and publications. RTA also utilizes social media including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and iAlerts. Social media is a relatively inexpensive advertising format that allows RTA to provide information quickly and easily to its users while raising RTA's profile and brand. Customer Information Center The Customer Information Center provides phone information to customers seven days per week. As call volumes fluctuate, RTA maintains staffing levels to adequately meet its customers' 25 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry needs. Various resources like Transtar, Google/Bing Transit trip planners, and Transit Master Bus tracking, allow agents to quickly and accurately answer all customer inquiries. Transportation NOW T-NOW was formed in 1992 as a grassroots advocacy group comprised of enthusiastic public transit advocates. Members of T-NOW range from elected officials to community activists to everyday transit users who are committed not only to addressing regional transportation issues but meeting the needs of individual communities. There are six T-NOW chapters throughout the service area that include Greater Riverside, Hemet/San Jacinto Area, Northwest, Moreno Valley/Perris, San Gorgonio Pass Area, and Southwest Riverside. Each chapter meets monthly and sets goals and objectives relevant to their communities. 3.5 BUDGET IMPACT ON PROPOSED CHANGES Planned service changes in FY14 and beyond are contingent upon economic conditions and available revenue. Therefore, should funding be unavailable for planned services and projects, the implementation and service improvements in conjunction with them will be delayed until sufficient revenue is available. Any new service should also adhere to RTA's Sustainable Funding Source Policy that was approved in September 2010. The enactment of the policy provides a framework that assures that funding sources, particularly temporary financial assistance or "seed" money are utilized only on service that has a significant potential to be productive and financially sustainable when funding expires or is depleted. This encourages the use of new or expanded service to demonstrate that it is warranted by meeting productivity standards over an established period of time. See Appendix D for the Sustainable Funding Source Policy. 26 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL & CAPITAL PLANS RTA's FY14 budget reflects a strategy to moderately grow current levels of safe, reliable and effective public bus transportation service while considering the continued economic pressures that demand efficiency to the greatest extent possible. To that end, RTA is planning for a service level that balances forecasted fiscal constraints with the varied profile of the service area as well as adjustments to record ridership demand and pre -positioning for future service. Staff remains fully committed to exploring all service and financial alternatives necessary to meeting the public transit needs of the citizens who live and work in western Riverside County. Public transportation helps alleviate congestion, ensures mobility, promotes more livable communities, and assists with meeting additional needs that arise as a result of the ADA. 4.1 OPERATING & CAPITAL BUDGET The total budget for FY14 is $78,841,766, with $61,181,842 projected for operating expenses and $17,659,924 projected for capital projects. Due to the prudence exercised over the past few years and the mildly improving economy, RTA is expecting an overall operating budget increase over FY13. As currently budgeted, total operating expenses for FY14 are $61,181,842 — an increase of $3,108,374 or 5% over FY13. It should be noted that RTA is planning for an increase of 5% in revenue service hours. The FY14 capital budget represents a decrease of $15,049,252 or 46% over FY13 levels. The significant reduction in the capital budget request is attributable to decreased funding requested for facilities and the heavy-duty CNG bus replacement, and considers the need to "hunker down" in the face of delayed Federal funding due to the 13(c) — Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) issue. Operating Budget Profile 00perations ■ Maintenance o Planning oAdministration $39,502,178 The proposed Operating Budget totals $61,181,842. Operations, at 65%, constitute the largest component of the proposed budget while Maintenance makes up 16% of the total. Thus, 27 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 combined Operations and Maintenance equate to 81% of the budget. Planning and Administration combined make up the remaining 19% of the budget. These percentage breakdowns are consistent with prior years. The operating budget contains five (5) major cost elements. The elements are: • Salaries and Benefits (50%), which are made up of wages and fringe benefits including medical, Worker's Compensation, and Other Post -Employment Benefits Annual Required Contribution (OPEB ARC). • Purchased Transportation (34%), which represents the resources required for contracted transportation services for DAR/Taxi Overflow and certain fixed -route services. • Materials and Supplies (6%), made up primarily of operating supplies including tires, parts, fuel, and lubricants for the operation, repair & maintenance of Agency vehicles. • Services (5%) include, but are not limited to, external auditing, legal, marketing, outside maintenance / custodial, armored transport, actuarial services, legislative consulting, trustee fees, and towing. • Other Expenses (5%) include, but are not limited to, provision for property and liability insurance, utilities, printing and publications, advertising and promotion, dues and subscriptions, and other miscellaneous expenses. A profile of proposed expenditures by cost element is shown below: $30,274,217 OSalaries & Benefits ■ Services OMaterials & Supplies OPurchased Transportation ■ Other Expenses 28 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riverside Transit Agency Capital Budget Profile The proposed FY14 Capital Budget totals $17,659,924. Capital funding will be used for the purchase of critical items to maintain existing operations and service levels. The Capital Budget is a component of the comprehensive five-year Capital Improvement Plan including equipment and upgrade of agency infrastructure. FY14 Capital Budget profile by project element is shown below: OMaintenance ■ Revenue Vehicles O Facilities ■ ITS $11,741,415 Notable capital projects included in the proposed FY14 budget include: • Funding for the replacement of the directly operated heavy duty CNG fleet • Purchase of replacement and expansion contract operated revenue vehicles • Tire lease • ITS Enhancement/Expansion for fixed route fleet • Associated Transit Improvements • Critical maintenance and support equipment • Operations and facilities security projects 29 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry 4.2 FUNDING SOURCES FOR OPERATING & CAPITAL PROGRAMS Funding for the Operating and Capital Budgets are generated from state, federal and local revenue sources. The chart shown below summarizes the allocation of each revenue source. Total Operating & Capital Revenues $78,841,766 Operating Revenues $61,181,842 Passenger Fares (Regular) $10,455,634 T-LTF Operating Assistance $34,000,000 Federal Operating Assistance $12,820,250 J FTA Section 5307 $11,760,000 FTA Section 5311 $425,000 FTA Section 5309 $161,250 JARC (5316) / New Freedom (5317) $474,000 Other Local Revenues $885,000 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) $161,250 Measure A $2,859,708 Capital Revenues $17,659,924 Federal $2,668,753 FTA Section 5307 $2,668,753 STA $752,066 Prop 1 B PTMISEA $13,344,315 Prop 1 B CTSGP $894,790 The amounts depicted above do not include the "pass -through" funding for the social service programs that RTA will oversee on behalf of RCTC. 30 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Riverside Transit Agency 4.3 REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS As a recipient of state and federal funding, RTA is required to comply with regulatory policies and procedures that are reviewed and audited regularly. Summary of Regulatory & Compliance Requirements Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Audit: Under the State of California, TDA provides two major sources of funding for public transportation: the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance Fund (STA). These funds are for the development and support of public transportation needs that exist in California and are allocated to areas of each county based on population, taxable sales and transit performance. The last TDA Triennial Audit was completed in June 2010 and RTA had no findings. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Triennial Review: The triennial review is a comprehensive review of compliance with FTA requirements that is conducted of Section 5307 grantees at least every three years. Even though the review is conducted of Section 5307 grantees, it addresses all FTA programs for which the grantee is the direct recipient of funds, including Sections 5307, 5309, 5310, 5316, and 5317 and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). It addresses the grantee's implementation of Federal requirements in 24 areas and its oversight of sub -recipients, operations contractors, or lessees funded by these programs. The last FTA Triennial Review was completed in June 2010 and RTA had no deficiencies. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The federal ADA Act of 1990 prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity and access with persons with disability. Under the ADA Act, public transit operators are required to provide complementary paratransit service to persons who are ADA certified and are within three-quarters of a mile of a local fixed route bus during the hours of bus service operation. RTA remains fully compliant with all Federal ADA regulations and has had no ADA customers denied service on DAR. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program: The federal DBE Program seeks to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of FTA's Department of Transportation - assisted contracts in the Department's highway, transit, and airport financial assistance programs and to create a level playing field on which DBEs can compete fairly for Department of Transportation -assisted contracts. As of March 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a new rule which established a three-year DBE goal. RTA's DBE Program was last submitted in September 2012 and will remain in effect through September 2015. 31 Short Range Transit Plan • FY14-2016 Rfvers.de Trgns.t R9nnry Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO): The Federal Transit Laws, 49 U.S.C. 5332(b), provide that "no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or age be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any project, program or activity funded in whole or in part through financial assistance under this Act." This applies to employment and business opportunities and is considered to be in addition to the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The federal EEO Program is submitted to FTA every three years. The last submission was in February 2012. Drug and Alcohol Testing: Per the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Part 40 & 655), RTA established a Drug & Alcohol testing policy in an effort to deter drug and alcohol use in the workplace. The policy establishes the circumstances in which applicants and employees are tested for drugs and alcohol in the workplace and the consequences when they test positive. The purpose of the policy is to prevent accidents, injuries, and fatalities resulting from the misuse of alcohol and prohibited drugs by employees who perform safety -sensitive functions. The Drug and Alcohol Report is in compliance with FTA and was last updated in October 2010. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance. Specifically, Title VI provides that "no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." (42 U.S.C. Section 2000d). RTA's Title VI Program is submitted to the FTA every three years. The last report was approved and submitted in December 2010. The next submittal will be October 2013. Limited English Proficiency (LEP): FTA issued regulations based on the Executive Order 13166 to all transit operators to establish LEP policies and procedures that ensures that RTA publications are issued in English and any other languages used by a significant number of the general population in the service area as determined by periodic demographic assessments. RTA's LEP policy and procedures were adopted in April 2009 and submitted with the Title VI Program in December 2010. The next submittal will be October 2013. Public Hearing Policy: U.S. Code Title 49 § 5307 under the Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program requires that transit systems maintain a process to solicit and consider public comments before raising fares or implementing major reductions in service. RTA's Public Comment Process for Fare Increases or Major Service Reductions was last revised in October 2012. See Appendix C. 32 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2012/13 - FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Summary Comparative Statistics: FY2013 Midyear Budget vs. Proposed FY2014 SRTP Unlinked Passengers Revenue Hours Revenue Miles Fare Revenue (1) Operating Expenses FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 Direct Operated Routes 1 1,804,793 1,813,649 59,789 61,528 649,899 675,850 $ 1,725,473 $ 1,616,594 $ 6,639,177 $ 6,729,216 3 - - - - 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - 10 231,446 237,828 13,633 14,100 159,122 160,516 $ 223,878 $ 214,164 $ 1,502,688 $ 1,542,097 11 169,602 173,811 9,559 10,210 118,289 119,783 $ 163,870 $ 166,337 $ 1,061,619 $ 1,116,665 12 283,752 286,056 14,926 15,631 174,781 176,371 $ 248,177 $ 253,646 $ 1,609,668 $ 1,709,627 13 272,664 266,273 15,010 15,122 171,497 175,151 $ 246,779 $ 224,521 $ 1,663,718 $ 1,653,962 14 231,133 282,930 14,453 17,980 186,336 187,279 $ 218,533 $ 254,212 $ 1,606,606 $ 1,966,504 15 432,311 447,131 18,723 20,106 225,242 240,372 $ 392,855 $ 389,004 $ 2,024,085 $ 2,199,339 16 652,709 672,456 26,430 28,124 314,353 307,931 $ 592,129 $ 588,264 $ 2,937,421 $ 3,076,346 18 187,450 200,041 9,456 10,302 121,890 130,947 $ 173,960 $ 169,715 $ 1,050,119 $ 1,127,213 19 595,739 659,880 19,840 22,480 244,796 256,426 $ 593,305 $ 629,393 $ 2,184,732 $ 2,458,569 20 311,251 318,374 16,203 16,947 248,882 257,281 $ 274,486 $ 283,735 $ 1,759,705 $ 1,853,857 21 D 94,498 128,261 6,385 8,902 100,709 137,052 $ 97,401 $ 127,338 $ 704,286 $ 975,719 22 424,580 425,439 20,896 21,581 368,088 372,328 $ 410,904 $ 407,740 $ 2,324,802 $ 2,360,261 27 505,702 507,949 28,086 30,175 588,285 612,386 $ 503,584 $ 521,714 $ 3,121,797 $ 3,300,281 29 140,864 135,707 8,999 9,068 146,575 147,589 $ 130,792 $ 132,057 $ 1,000,327 $ 991,829 41D 64,754 72,978 3,347 3,779 53,552 60,053 $ 55,218 $ 65,125 $ 326,509 $ 413,223 49 216,227 211,898 8,945 9,011 106,015 106,840 $ 211,734 $ 202,130 $ 996,244 $ 985,560 54 226 386 2,660 $ 26,734 $ - $ 41,371 $ - 204D 50,633 45,099 5,395 4,335 139,912 110,030 $ 80,821 $ 78,134 $ 576,258 $ 474,008 206D 66,367 65,045 5,030 4,973 156,938 157,570 $ 172,912 $ 178,464 $ 562,430 $ 543,715 208D 26,758 24,362 2,240 2,308 54,591 54,723 $ 48,362 $ 32,455 $ 245,516 $ 252,340 216 78,152 75,326 6,057 6,131 149,148 163,338 $ 343,404 $ 366,208 $ 669,854 $ 670,536 217D - 3,476 - 1,020 0 29,988 $ - $ 15,489 $ - $ 111,531 Total Direct Operated Routes 6,841,611 7,053,969 313,788 333,811 4,481,560 4,639,803 $ 6,935,310 $ 6,916,442 $ 34,608,933 $ 36,512,399 Change - FY14 vs. FY13 3.10% 6.38% 3.53% -0.3% 5.5% Contracted Fixed Routes 3 92,852 101,852 9,666 10,965 132,124 146,727 $ 91,584 $ 104,678 $ 667,928 $ 771,249 7 127,536 118,845 9,850 9,982 145,569 146,445 $ 144,786 $ 120,176 $ 688,131 $ 702,109 8 137,270 128,322 9,725 9,864 177,674 179,307 $ 167,600 $ 138,908 $ 687,103 $ 693,841 19C 2,429 5,552 80 983 1,119 17,477 $ - $ 5,296 $ - $ 69,241 21C 44,425 10,079 2,864 673 45,250 10,536 $ 47,016 $ 9,905 $ 205,256 $ 46,912 23 82,855 76,464 9,867 10,090 160,143 164,850 $ 91,912 $ 78,551 $ 701,594 $ 709,724 24 75,695 75,460 9,053 9,451 137,984 139,313 $ 80,365 $ 79,263 $ 633,491 $ 664,758 30 77,205 73,631 7,341 7,369 85,370 81,141 $ 73,107 $ 69,228 $ 516,584 $ 518,336 31 130,687 155,791 10,072 12,160 174,090 200,431 $ 129,080 $ 156,227 $ 694,995 $ 855,491 32 110,777 163,136 7,598 11,327 88,380 120,500 $ 105,037 $ 150,852 $ 522,064 $ 796,955 33 40,482 39,099 4,661 4,942 64,415 64,694 $ 37,380 $ 37,579 $ 321,463 $ 347,600 35 74,166 66,528 6,662 6,816 161,400 155,346 $ 72,406 $ 62,948 $ 459,513 $ 479,430 40 25,518 22,978 3,299 3,315 60,630 59,186 $ 28,478 $ 25,299 $ 231,632 $ 233,168 41 C 41,386 35,242 5,774 5,471 103,326 97,917 $ 52,079 $ 32,468 $ 431,605 $ 384,807 42 50,425 46,349 5,166 5,294 80,963 82,692 $ 48,835 $ 40,514 $ 374,735 $ 372,354 50 7,835 11,979 2,336 2,352 16,188 15,283 $ 159,595 $ 159,595 $ 166,245 $ 165,441 51 37,283 34,533 2,028 2,047 21,607 21,369 $ 126,888 $ 126,888 $ 143,602 $ 144,153 54 411 1,397 890 1,548 6,904 12,520 $ 62,656 $ 111,007 $ 63,137 $ 108,916 55 28,996 27,022 1,173 1,183 15,652 15,351 $ 16,361 $ 16,361 $ 82,241 $ 83,171 61 65,472 54,438 6,756 6,375 119,327 114,793 $ 64,141 $ 59,984 $ 441,118 $ 448,400 74 131,633 134,311 10,300 11,684 187,372 201,603 $ 172,057 $ 132,674 $ 712,576 $ 821,828 79 88,654 83,400 10,606 11,072 189,494 192,576 $ 131,380 $ 108,302 $ 750,615 $ 778,782 202 (incl. beach) 23,491 22,697 5,510 5,568 154,170 155,846 $ 53,154 $ 53,473 $ 380,232 $ 391,427 204 - 13,577 - 1,352 0 32,156 $ - $ 24,031 $ - $ 95,061 206C 2,916 3,122 - 275 8,077 9,996 $ - $ 7,863 $ 15,822 $ 19,371 208 28,891 28,844 5,184 5,526 132,410 131,249 $ 50,231 $ 77,224 $ 363,967 $ 388,673 210 10,151 7,814 1,268 1,066 26,654 20,783 $ 29,841 $ 21,138 $ 105,282 $ 96,247 212 28,568 29,486 5,771 5,801 147,167 148,232 $ 107,029 $ 122,923 $ 404,864 $ 408,044 217 28,385 26,312 6,691 7,721 222,696 226,160 $ 112,599 $ 115,437 $ 470,943 $ 543,102 SunLine 220 (2) - - 0 $ - $ - $ 62,000 $ 63,000 OCTA 794 (z) - - 0 $ 116,000 $ 124,000 $ 116,000 $ 124,000 Total Contracted Fixed Routes 1,596,394 1,598,261 160,190 172,272 2,866,153 2,964,475 $ 2,371,598 $ 2,372,794 $ 11,414,737 $ 12,325,592 % Change - FY14 vs. FY13 0.12% 7.54% 3.43% 0.1 % 8.0% TOTAL FIXED ROUTES 8,438,005 8,652,230 473,978 506,083 7,347,713 7,604,277 $ 9,306,909 $ 9,289,235 $ 46,023,670 $ 48,837,992 Change - FY14 vs. FY13 2.54% 6.77% 3.49% -0.2% 6.1 % 5:28 PM 5/23/2013 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2012/13 - FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Summary Comparative Statistics: FY2013 Midyear Budget vs. Proposed FY2014 SRTP Unlinked Passengers Revenue Hours Revenue Miles Fare Revenue (1) Operating Expenses FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 FY2013 FY2014 Dial -a -ride Routes Banning/Beaumont 1,906 2,793 913 1,113 21,677 27,323 $ 7,754 $ 9,686 $ 55,306 $ 69,033 Lake Elsinore 13,990 15,507 7,610 8,356 157,669 169,802 $ 48,170 $ 56,732 $ 461,070 $ 518,424 Highgrove 5,809 6,698 3,468 3,658 74,473 75,866 $ 30,394 $ 19,583 $ 210,134 $ 226,943 Hemet & Homeland 90,368 91,954 32,534 32,639 577,542 567,369 $ 294,473 $ 335,954 $ 1,971,120 $ 2,024,967 Jurupa 12,990 12,784 6,683 6,389 130,779 118,077 $ 43,587 $ 44,592 $ 404,895 $ 396,365 Moreno Valley 88,628 77,958 34,674 33,912 621,883 594,696 $ 263,296 $ 280,836 $ 2,100,771 $ 2,103,935 Murrieta 43,795 45,261 22,989 23,417 444,284 447,060 $ 144,375 $ 160,070 $ 1,392,797 $ 1,452,854 Norco 25,312 22,034 8,960 8,703 169,532 152,058 $ 91,741 $ 88,658 $ 542,823 $ 539,968 Perris 41,173 42,485 20,614 20,855 449,079 439,758 $ 137,600 $ 152,700 $ 1,248,912 $ 1,293,890 Riverside 86,534 83,107 42,842 41,287 877,214 825,135 $ 304,011 $ 323,885 $ 2,595,643 $ 2,561,494 Sun City 15,462 17,952 8,877 9,914 184,063 197,468 $ 49,270 $ 61,872 $ 537,853 $ 615,073 Total Dial -a -ride Routes 425,967 418,533 190,164 190,243 3,708,195 3,614,612 $ 1,414,671 $ 1,534,567 $ 11,521,323 $ 11,802,945 % Change - FY14 vs. FY13 -1.75% 0.04% -2.52% 8.5% 2.4% Taxi Program Banning/Beaumont 139 321 103 216 3,274 5,111 $ 948 $ 1,433 $ 10,725 $ 17,118 Lake Elsinore 919 660 645 451 16,955 12,898 $ 5,057 $ 2,976 $ 57,199 $ 42,313 Highgrove 416 746 250 458 7,434 11,592 $ 2,084 $ 3,301 $ 24,609 $ 38,522 Hemet & Homeland 1,102 1,721 746 1,441 20,241 33,182 $ 4,255 $ 6,569 $ 67,933 $ 111,501 Jurupa 105 142 52 81 1,333 1,976 $ 571 $ 584 $ 4,517 $ 6,598 Moreno Valley 1,585 650 1,114 435 31,426 8,067 $ 7,472 $ 2,606 $ 104,829 $ 27,909 Murrieta 706 981 488 756 14,868 19,021 $ 3,454 $ 4,369 $ 49,032 $ 63,252 Norco 664 876 273 444 9,728 12,945 $ 2,647 $ 3,420 $ 31,413 $ 42,379 Perris 1,053 1,104 670 586 17,903 13,302 $ 4,341 $ 3,849 $ 60,241 $ 44,781 Riverside 1,736 2,362 944 1,484 26,573 35,385 $ 6,180 $ 8,610 $ 88,670 $ 118,407 Sun City 525 542 309 387 8,796 8,295 $ 2,130 $ 2,321 $ 29,307 $ 28,127 Total Taxi Routes 8,950 10,105 5,594 6,739 158,530 161,775 $ 39,139 $ 40,039 $ 528,476 $ 540,905 % Change - FY14 vs. FY13 12.91 % 20.48% 2.05% 2.3% 2.4% TOTAL DAR and TAXI SERVICE 434,917 428,638 195,758 196,982 3,866,726 3,776,387 $ 1,453,810 $ 1,574,606 $ 12,049,798 $ 12,343,851 Change - FY14 vs. FY13 -1.44% 0.63% -2.34% 8.3% 2.4% Other Revenue $ 3,491,025 $ 3,136,500 -10.2% GRAND TOTAL 8,872,922 9,080,868 669,735 703,065 11,214,439 11,380,664 $ 14,251,744 $ 14,000,342 $ 58,073,468 $ 61,181,842 % Change - FY14 vs. FY13 2.34% 4.98% 1.48% -1.8% 5.4% Total Passenger Fare Revenue consists of cash fares, tickets, passes, subsidy agreements and Measure A. It does not include other local revenues. RTA does not report passengers, hours and miles. 5:28 PM 5/23/2013 Riverside Transit Agency Bus (Motorbus) / Directly Operated Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Year Built Mfg. Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active # of Vehicles Contingency FY Vehicles 2012/13 FY 2012/13 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2001 NAB 40LFW15 2002 NAB 40LFW15 40 40 47 47 40 40 CN CN 47 47 0 0 25,569,381 24,927,429 27,507,195 26,939,730 585,259 573,186 Totals: 80 94 94 0 50,496,810 54,446,925 579,223 TransTrack Manager"" 4/24/2013 Page 1 of 3 Riverside Transit Agency Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2012/13 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2012/13 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 1994 1996 2008 2008 2009 2012 2011 2007 2003 2008 2003 2004 CCI CCI EBC EDN EDN EDN SPC STR SVM SVM TBB TBB AH28 AH28 Aerotech EnAeroElit EnAeroElit EnAeroElit SN28PLO Allstar ClassAmSer ClassAmSer SLF232G SLF232G 25 25 12 26 26 28 21 12 24 26 27 27 4 1 11 4 21 10 14 6 3 2 1 3 29 29 24 29 29 33 28 24 27 29 33 33 CN CN GA GA GA CN GA GA CN CN CN CN 4 1 11 4 21 10 14 6 3 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 831,936 242,694 3,288,850 949,732 3,871,198 0 738,910 1,681,514 585,156 214,492 451,613 1,245,238 901,027 258,596 2,719,344 1,131,595 4,871,285 194,093 1,299,378 1,869,976 675,212 282,299 489,696 1,312,952 225,257 258,596 247,213 282,899 231,966 19,409 92,813 311,663 225,071 141,150 489,696 437,651 Totals: 279 80 80 0 14,101,333 16,005,453 200,068 TransTrack Manager'"' 4/24/2013 Page 2 of 3 Riverside Transit Agency Demand Response / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2012/13 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2012/13 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2011/12 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2012/13 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2012/13 2008 2009 2013 2007 EBC EBC GCC STR Aerotech Aerotech GCII Allstar 12 12 12 12 10 54 1 23 24 24 22 24 GA GA GA GA 10 54 1 23 0 0 0 0 849,174 7,282,364 0 5,934,511 2,006,476 9,075,155 5,072 6,449,312 200,648 168,058 5,072 280,405 Totals: 48 88 88 0 14,066,049 17,536,015 199,273 TransTrack Manager"" 4/24/2013 Page 3 of 3 Riverside Transit Agency Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 146 163 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $45,604,814 $49,026,252 $58,073,468 $39,583,416 $61,181,842 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $12,504,724 $13,246,856 $14,251,746 $12,173,998 $14,000,342 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $33,100,090 $35,779,396 $43,821,722 $27,409,418 $47,181,500 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 8,092,220 8,800,275 8,735,044 6,908,921 9,080,868 Passenger Miles 56,398,387 61,523,259 61,275,711 48,262,267 63,375,753 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 600,356.6 625,224.8 666,566.0 496,547.8 703,065.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 10,174,233.0 10,442,450.1 11,150,603.0 7,981,217.7 11,380,664.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 11,926,377.3 12,796,329.5 13,504,857.0 9,797,256.2 13,939,195.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $75.96 $78.41 $87.12 $79.72 $87.02 Farebox Recovery Ratio 27.42% 27.02% 24.54% 30.76% 22.88% Subsidy per Passenger $4.09 $4.07 $5.02 $3.97 $5.20 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.59 $0.58 $0.72 $0.57 $0.74 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $55.13 $57.23 $65.74 $55.20 $67.11 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.25 $3.43 $3.93 $3.43 $4.15 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 13.5 14.1 13.1 13.9 12.9 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.80 0.84 0.78 0.87 0.80 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of I Riverside Transit Agency Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 145 162 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $41,316,403 $45,645,577 $57,932,914 $39,465,358 $61,072,926 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $11,063,332 $12,394,066 $14,162,356 $12,101,274 $13,889,335 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $30,253,071 $33,251,511 $43,770,558 $27,364,084 $47,183,591 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 7,433,701 8,186,180 8,709,514 6,908,242 9,079,471 Passenger Miles 51,102,958 56,612,084 61,148,061 48,257,131 63,366,249 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 529,226.8 574,420.1 665,289.0 495,624.2 701,517.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 8,719,515.3 9,559,128.6 11,140,281.0 7,973,140.8 11,368,144.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 10,129,298.5 11,682,426.4 13,492,474.0 9,777,943.5 13,896,785.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $78.07 $79.46 $87.08 $79.63 $87.06 Farebox Recovery Ratio 26.78% 27.15% 24.44% 30.66% 22.74% Subsidy per Passenger $4.07 $4.06 $5.03 $3.96 $5.20 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.59 $0.59 $0.72 $0.57 $0.74 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $57.16 $57.89 $65.79 $55.21 $67.26 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.47 $3.48 $3.93 $3.43 $4.15 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 14.0 14.3 13.1 13.9 12.9 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.85 0.86 0.78 0.87 0.80 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of I Riverside Transit Agency Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 1 1 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $4,288,411 $3,380,675 $140,554 $118,058 $108,916 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $1,441,392 $852,790 $89,390 $72,724 $111,007 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $2,847,019 $2,527,885 $51,164 $45,334 ($2,091) Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 658,519 614,095 25,530 679 1,397 Passenger Miles 5,295,429 4,911,174 127,650 5,136 9,504 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 71,129.8 50,804.7 1,277.0 923.6 1,548.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 1,454,717.7 883,321.6 10,322.0 8,076.9 12,520.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 1,797,078.9 1,113,903.2 12,383.0 19,312.7 42,410.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $60.29 $66.54 $110.07 $127.83 $70.36 Farebox Recovery Ratio 33.61% 25.23% 63.59% 61.60% 101.91% Subsidy per Passenger $4.32 $4.12 $2.00 $66.77 ($1.50) Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.54 $0.51 $0.40 $8.83 ($0.22) Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $40.03 $49.76 $40.07 $49.09 ($1.35) Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $1.96 $2.86 $4.96 $5.61 ($0.17) Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 9.3 12.1 20.0 0.7 0.9 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.45 0.70 2.47 0.08 0.11 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of 1 Riverside Transit Agency Table 2 -- RTA-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 83 76 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $26,833,799 $28,350,031 $34,468,471 $23,666,650 $36,575,399 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $8,664,267 $9,273,170 $10,136,518 $9,138,524 $10,052,942 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $18,169,532 $19,076,861 $24,331,953 $14,528,126 $26,522,457 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 6,299,800 6,784,928 6,738,031 5,335,474 7,053,969 Passenger Miles 40,570,712 43,694,936 43,395,361 34,360,453 45,062,676 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 289,490.9 297,815.5 312,340.0 235,940.9 333,811.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 4,183,981.3 4,189,092.8 4,461,211.0 3,317,829.9 4,639,803.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 4,819,844.3 4,872,609.4 5,203,460.0 3,847,974.9 5,342,247.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $92.69 $95.19 $110.36 $100.31 $109.57 Farebox Recovery Ratio 32.29% 32.71% 29.40% 38.61% 27.48% Subsidy per Passenger $2.88 $2.81 $3.61 $2.72 $3.76 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.45 $0.44 $0.56 $0.42 $0.59 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $62.76 $64.06 $77.90 $61.58 $79.45 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.34 $4.55 $5.45 $4.38 $5.72 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 21.8 22.8 21.6 22.6 21.1 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.51 1.62 1.51 1.61 1.52 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of 1 =RTA . Riverside Transit Agency Table 2 -- RTA Bus (Contract) -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 63 87 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $9,737,695 $10,555,175 $11,303,233 $8,017,894 $12,138,592 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $2,544,245 $2,557,103 $2,545,418 $1,830,575 $2,248,794 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $7,193,450 $7,998,072 $8,757,815 $6,187,319 $9,889,798 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,462,330 1,635,377 1,562,096 1,281,555 1,598,261 Passenger Miles 11,932,613 13,344,676 12,748,328 10,457,489 13,255,145 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 164,232.2 163,002.4 158,468.0 119,243.5 172,272.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 3,070,908.0 3,004,498.4 2,822,666.0 2,152,841.0 2,964,475.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 3,627,796.2 4,023,113.4 3,681,412.0 2,955,205.0 4,066,373.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $59.29 $64.75 $71.33 $67.24 $70.46 Farebox Recovery Ratio 26.13% 24.23% 22.51% 22.83% 18.52% Subsidy per Passenger $4.92 $4.89 $5.61 $4.83 $6.19 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.60 $0.60 $0.69 $0.59 $0.75 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $43.80 $49.07 $55.27 $51.89 $57.41 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.34 $2.66 $3.10 $2.87 $3.34 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 8.9 10.0 9.9 10.7 9.3 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.48 0.54 0.55 0.60 0.54 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of I Riverside Transit Agency Table 2 -- RTA-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $8,536,961 $9,588,341 $11,651,466 $7,450,705 $11,802,945 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $1,137,741 $1,274,562 $1,414,671 $1,069,584 $1,534,567 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $7,399,220 $8,313,779 $10,236,795 $6,381,121 $10,268,378 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 322,611 372,322 425,967 285,179 418,533 Passenger Miles 3,806,810 4,393,400 5,026,403 3,365,112 4,938,691 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 141,996.6 159,636.0 190,164.0 136,961.9 190,243.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 2,786,202.2 3,114,807.8 3,708,195.0 2,394,713.8 3,614,611.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 3,345,595.5 3,766,555.5 4,461,454.0 2,878,243.2 4,368,800.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $60.12 $60.06 $61.27 $54.40 $62.04 Farebox Recovery Ratio 13.33% 13.29% 12.14% 14.36% 13.00% Subsidy per Passenger $22.94 $22.33 $24.03 $22.38 $24.53 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.94 $1.89 $2.04 $1.90 $2.08 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $52.11 $52.08 $53.83 $46.59 $53.98 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.66 $2.67 $2.76 $2.66 $2.84 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of I Riverside Transit Agency Table 2 -- RTA Taxi -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/11 Audited FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2013/14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $375,170 $411,374 $534,298 $369,108 $540,906 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $37,281 $32,703 $39,139 $27,085 $40,039 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $337,889 $378,671 $495,159 $342,023 500,867 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 7,479 7,648 8,950 6,713 10,105 Passenger Miles 88,252 90,246 105,619 79,213 119,241 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 4,637.0 4,771.0 5,594.0 4,401.4 6,739.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 133,141.6 134,051.2 158,531.0 115,833.1 161,775.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 133,141.4 134,051.2 158,531.0 115,833.1 161,775.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $80.91 $86.22 $95.51 $83.86 $80.27 Farebox Recovery Ratio 9.94% 7.95% 7.32% 7.34% 7.40% Subsidy per Passenger $45.18 $49.51 $55.33 $50.95 $49.57 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.83 $4.20 $4.69 $4.32 $4.20 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $72.87 $79.37 $88.52 $77.71 $74.32 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.54 $2.82 $3.12 $2.95 $3.10 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2013/14 — FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Table 2A — Excluded Routes Route # Mode (FR/DR) Service Type (DO/CO) Route Description Date of Implementation Exemption End Date 54C FR CO County Shuttle- County Administrative Center to Commerce St. Metrokink Parking Lot April 11, 2012 June 30, 2014 Note: Excluded routes are new routes or new service extensions that are eligible for exemption from the farebox recovery requirements. Riverside Transit Agency Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2013/14 All Routes Peak Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy RTA-0 Total $3,136,500 ($3,136,500) RTA-1 Total 14 1,813,649 9,103,154 61,526.0 64,694.0 675,849.0 770,055.0 $6,729,217 $1,616,595 $5,112,622 RTA-10 Total 3 237,828 1,192,665 14,100.0 14,799.0 160,516.0 170,082.0 $1,542,097 $214,164 $1,327,933 RTA-11 Total 2 173,811 873,095 10,210.0 10,534.0 119,783.0 129,579.0 $1,116,665 $166,337 $950,328 RTA-12 Total 3 286,056 1,436,120 15,631.0 16,140.0 176,371.0 189,789.0 $1,709,627 $253,646 $1,455,981 RTA-13 Total 3 266,273 1,336,411 15,122.0 15,645.0 175,151.0 188,267.0 $1,653,962 $224,521 $1,429,441 RTA-14 Total 4 282,930 1,419,076 17,980.0 18,654.0 187,279.0 203,634.0 $1,966,504 $254,212 $1,712,292 RTA-15 Total 4 447,131 2,245,443 20,106.0 20,777.0 240,372.0 251,907.0 $2,199,339 $389,004 $1,810,335 RTA-16/16E Total 6 672,456 3,373,814 28,124.0 29,000.0 307,931.0 328,329.0 $3,076,346 $588,265 $2,488,081 RTA-18 Total 2 200,041 1,003,543 10,302.0 10,870.0 130,947.0 146,768.0 $1,127,213 $169,715 $957,498 RTA-19 Total 4 659,880 3,312,880 22,480.0 23,799.0 256,426.0 304,073.0 $2,458,569 $629,394 $1,829,175 RTA-19C Total 1 5,552 36,836 983.0 1,297.0 17,477.0 23,852.0 $69,241 $5,296 $63,945 RTA-20 Total 3 318,374 1,597,714 16,947.0 18,237.0 257,281.0 290,891.0 $1,853,857 $283,735 $1,570,122 RTA-202 Total 3 22,697 585,343 5,568.0 7,261.0 155,846.0 212,376.0 $391,427 $53,473 $337,954 RTA-204 Total 4 13,577 342,140 1,352.0 1,728.0 32,156.0 40,991.0 $95,061 $24,031 $71,030 RTA-204D Total 1 45,099 586,288 4,335.0 4,667.0 110,030.0 115,130.0 $474,008 $78,134 $395,874 RTA-206C Total 1 3,122 78,686 275.0 823.0 9,996.0 24,303.0 $19,371 $7,863 $11,508 RTA-206D Total 4 65,045 845,585 4,973.0 9,469.0 157,570.0 294,923.0 $543,715 $178,464 $365,251 RTA-208 Total 3 28,844 726,877 5,526.0 7,820.0 131,249.0 197,262.0 $388,673 $77,224 $311,449 RTA-208D Total 2 24,362 316,707 2,308.0 3,455.0 54,723.0 93,768.0 $252,340 $32,455 $219,885 RTA-21 Total 1 128,261 645,064 8,902.0 9,177.0 137,052.0 148,292.0 $975,719 $127,338 $848,381 RTA-210 Total 3 7,814 196,914 1,066.0 2,336.0 20,783.0 70,732.0 $96,247 $21,138 $75,109 RTA-212 Total 3 29,486 743,057 5,801.0 8,279.0 148,232.0 220,771.0 $408,044 $122,923 $285,121 RTA-216 Total 3 75,326 1,024,439 6,131.0 6,604.0 163,338.0 168,401.0 $670,536 $366,208 $304,328 RTA-217 Total 5 26,312 663,060 7,721.0 10,796.0 226,160.0 328,066.0 $543,102 $115,437 $427,665 RTA-217D Total 1 3,476 45,185 1,020.0 1,211.0 29,988.0 33,303.0 $111,531 $15,489 $96,042 RTA-21C Total 2 10,079 68,540 673.0 845.0 10,536.0 15,864.0 $46,912 $9,905 $37,007 RTA-22 Total 4 425,439 5,718,598 21,581.0 24,113.0 372,328.0 449,866.0 $2,360,261 $407,740 $1,952,521 TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of 6 Riverside Transit Agency Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2013/14 All Routes Peak Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy RTA-23 Total 6 76,464 516,153 10,090.0 13,161.0 164,850.0 264,460.0 $709,724 $78,551 $631,173 RTA-24 Total 4 75,460 509,172 9,451.0 12,459.0 139,313.0 224,790.0 $664,758 $79,263 $585,495 RTA-27 Total 6 507,949 6,876,586 30,175.0 32,283.0 612,386.0 677,175.0 $3,300,281 $521,714 $2,778,567 RTA-29 Total 2 135,707 681,820 9,068.0 9,459.0 147,589.0 157,326.0 $991,829 $132,057 $859,772 RTA-3 Total 3 101,853 692,590 10,965.0 12,553.0 146,727.0 216,265.0 $771,250 $104,679 $666,571 RTA-30 Total 2 73,631 488,763 7,369.0 7,770.0 81,141.0 86,548.0 $518,336 $69,228 $449,108 RTA-31 Total 5 155,791 1,052,931 12,160.0 13,721.0 200,431.0 240,769.0 $855,491 $156,227 $699,264 RTA-32 Total 5 163,136 1,102,251 11,327.0 12,497.0 120,500.0 150,214.0 $796,955 $150,853 $646,102 RTA-33 Total 4 39,099 265,878 4,942.0 5,817.0 64,694.0 87,134.0 $347,600 $37,579 $310,021 RTA-35 Total 4 66,528 452,387 6,816.0 8,208.0 155,346.0 195,891.0 $479,430 $62,948 $416,482 RTA-40 Total 2 22,978 156,251 3,315.0 3,588.0 59,186.0 66,326.0 $233,168 $25,299 $207,869 RTA-41C Total 2 35,242 237,588 5,471.0 6,743.0 97,917.0 129,426.0 $384,807 $32,468 $352,339 RTA-41D Total 2 72,978 364,888 3,779.0 5,186.0 60,053.0 111,629.0 $413,223 $65,125 $348,098 RTA-42 Total 4 46,349 309,818 5,294.0 5,956.0 82,692.0 100,335.0 $372,354 $40,514 $331,840 RTA-49 Total 2 211,898 1,063,601 9,011.0 9,384.0 106,840.0 119,060.0 $985,560 $202,130 $783,430 RTA-50 Total 2 11,979 81,457 2,352.0 3,023.0 15,283.0 33,790.0 $165,441 $159,595 $5,846 RTA-51 Total 1 34,533 234,823 2,047.0 2,419.0 21,369.0 29,569.0 $144,153 $126,888 $17,265 RTA-54C Total 1 1,397 9,504 1,548.0 2,497.0 12,520.0 42,410.0 $108,916 $111,007 ($2,091) RTA-55 Total 2 27,022 183,751 1,183.0 2,320.0 15,351.0 52,331.0 $83,171 $16,361 $66,810 RTA-61 Total 2 54,438 370,175 6,375.0 6,921.0 114,793.0 130,348.0 $448,400 $59,984 $388,416 RTA-7 Total 2 118,845 802,478 9,982.0 11,053.0 146,445.0 174,446.0 $702,109 $120,176 $581,933 RTA-74 Total 4 134,311 913,316 11,684.0 13,288.0 201,601.0 254,107.0 $821,828 $132,674 $689,154 RTA-79 Total 4 83,400 567,116 11,072.0 13,010.0 192,574.0 246,890.0 $778,782 $108,302 $670,480 RTA-794 Total $124,000 $124,000 $0 RTA-8 Total 3 128,322 867,290 9,864.0 11,030.0 179,307.0 206,107.0 $693,841 $138,908 $554,933 RTA-Ba/Bea Total 2,793 32,958 1,113.0 1,567.0 27,323.0 35,126.0 $69,033 $9,686 $59,347 RTA-GT DAR Total 6,698 79,038 3,658.0 4,635.0 75,866.0 86,482.0 $226,943 $19,583 $207,360 RTA-Hemet Total 91,954 1,085,056 32,639.0 45,552.0 567,369.0 714,832.0 $2,024,967 $335,954 $1,689,013 TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 2 of 6 Riverside Transit Agency Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2013/14 All Routes Peak Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy RTA-Jurupa Total 12,784 150,854 6,389.0 8,976.0 118,077.0 144,410.0 $396,365 $44,592 $351,773 RTA-LakeEl Total 15,507 182,984 8,356.0 11,806.0 169,802.0 210,374.0 $518,424 $56,732 $461,692 RTA-MurDAR Total 45,261 534,081 23,417.0 31,240.0 447,060.0 541,334.0 $1,452,854 $160,070 $1,292,784 RTA-MV DAR Total 77,958 919,900 33,912.0 46,052.0 594,696.0 705,649.0 $2,103,935 $280,836 $1,823,099 RTA-No/Co Total 22,034 259,999 8,703.0 12,497.0 152,058.0 212,678.0 $539,967 $88,657 $451,310 RTA-Perris Total 42,485 501,323 20,855.0 27,301.0 439,758.0 500,383.0 $1,293,890 $152,700 $1,141,190 RTA-RivDAR Total 83,107 980,662 41,287.0 54,651.0 825,134.0 987,589.0 $2,561,494 $323,885 $2,237,609 RTA-Sun Ci Total 17,952 211,836 9,914.0 13,475.0 197,468.0 229,943.0 $615,073 $61,872 $553,201 RTA-TaxiBB Total 321 3,789 216.0 216.0 5,111.0 5,111.0 $17,118 $1,433 $15,685 RTA-TaxiGT Total 746 8,803 458.0 458.0 11,592.0 11,592.0 $38,522 $3,301 $35,221 RTA-TaxiHe Total 1,721 20,307 1,441.0 1,441.0 33,183.0 33,183.0 $111,501 $6,569 $104,932 RTA-TaxiJu Total 142 1,677 81.0 81.0 1,976.0 1,976.0 $6,598 $584 $6,014 RTA-TaxiLE Total 660 7,788 451.0 451.0 12,898.0 12,898.0 $42,313 $2,976 $39,337 RTA-TaxiMu Total 981 11,576 756.0 756.0 19,021.0 19,021.0 $63,252 $4,369 $58,883 RTA-TaxiMV Total 650 7,670 435.0 435.0 8,067.0 8,067.0 $27,909 $2,606 $25,303 RTA-TaxiNC Total 876 10,336 444.0 444.0 12,945.0 12,945.0 $42,379 $3,421 $38,958 RTA-TaxiPe Total 1,104 13,026 586.0 586.0 13,302.0 13,302.0 $44,781 $3,849 $40,932 RTA-TaxiRi Total 2,362 27,873 1,484.0 1,484.0 35,385.0 35,385.0 $118,406 $8,610 $109,796 RTA-TaxiSC Total 542 6,396 387.0 387.0 8,295.0 8,295.0 $28,127 $2,321 $25,806 SL-220 Total $63,000 $63,000 Service Provider Totals 163 9,080,868 63,375,753 703,065.0 831,867.0 11,380,664.0 13,939,195.0 $61,181,842 $14,000,342 $47,181,500 TransTrack Manager'"' 5/23/2013 Page 3 of 6 Riverside Transit Agency Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2013/14 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile RTA-0 Total RTA-1 Total $109.37 $9.96 $3.71 24.02% $2.82 $0.56 $83.10 $7.56 29.5 2.68 RTA-10 Total $109.37 $9.61 $6.48 13.88% $5.58 $1.11 $94.18 $8.27 16.9 1.48 RTA-11 Total $109.37 $9.32 $6.42 14.89% $5.47 $1.09 $93.08 $7.93 17.0 1.45 RTA-12 Total $109.37 $9.69 $5.98 14.83% $5.09 $1.01 $93.15 $8.26 18.3 1.62 RTA-13 Total $109.37 $9.44 $6.21 13.57% $5.37 $1.07 $94.53 $8.16 17.6 1.52 RTA-14 Total $109.37 $10.50 $6.95 12.92% $6.05 $1.21 $95.23 $9.14 15.7 1.51 RTA-15 Total $109.39 $9.15 $4.92 17.68% $4.05 $0.81 $90.04 $7.53 22.2 1.86 RTA-16/16E Total $109.39 $9.99 $4.57 19.12% $3.70 $0.74 $88.47 $8.08 23.9 2.18 RTA-18 Total $109.42 $8.61 $5.63 15.05% $4.79 $0.95 $92.94 $7.31 19.4 1.53 RTA-19 Total $109.37 $9.59 $3.73 25.60% $2.77 $0.55 $81.37 $7.13 29.4 2.57 RTA-19C Total $70.44 $3.96 $12.47 7.64% $11.52 $1.74 $65.05 $3.66 5.6 0.32 RTA-20 Total $109.39 $7.21 $5.82 15.30% $4.93 $0.98 $92.65 $6.10 18.8 1.24 RTA-202 Total $70.30 $2.51 $17.25 13.66% $14.89 $0.58 $60.70 $2.17 4.1 0.15 RTA-204 Total $70.31 $2.96 $7.00 25.27% $5.23 $0.21 $52.54 $2.21 10.0 0.42 RTA-204D Total $109.34 $4.31 $10.51 16.48% $8.78 $0.68 $91.32 $3.60 10.4 0.41 RTA-206C Total $70.44 $1.94 $6.20 40.59% $3.69 $0.15 $41.85 $1.15 11.4 0.31 RTA-206D Total $109.33 $3.45 $8.36 32.82% $5.62 $0.43 $73.45 $2.32 13.1 0.41 RTA-208 Total $70.34 $2.96 $13.48 19.86% $10.80 $0.43 $56.36 $2.37 5.2 0.22 RTA-208D Total $109.33 $4.61 $10.36 12.86% $9.03 $0.69 $95.27 $4.02 10.6 0.45 RTA-21 Total $109.61 $7.12 $7.61 13.05% $6.61 $1.32 $95.30 $6.19 14.4 0.94 RTA-210 Total $90.29 $4.63 $12.32 21.96% $9.61 $0.38 $70.46 $3.61 7.3 0.38 RTA-212 Total $70.34 $2.75 $13.84 30.12% $9.67 $0.38 $49.15 $1.92 5.1 0.20 RTA-216 Total $109.37 $4.11 $8.90 54.61% $4.04 $0.30 $49.64 $1.86 12.3 0.46 RTA-217 Total $70.34 $2.40 $20.64 21.25% $16.25 $0.64 $55.39 $1.89 3.4 0.12 RTA-217D Total $109.34 $3.72 $32.09 13.88% $27.63 $2.13 $94.16 $3.20 3.4 0.12 RTA-21C Total $69.71 $4.45 $4.65 21.11% $3.67 $0.54 $54.99 $3.51 15.0 0.96 RTA-22 Total $109.37 $6.34 $5.55 17.27% $4.59 $0.34 $90.47 $5.24 19.7 1.14 TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 4 of 6 Riverside Transit Agency Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2013/14 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile RTA-23 Total $70.34 $4.31 $9.28 11.06% $8.25 $1.22 $62.55 $3.83 7.6 0.46 RTA-24 Total $70.34 $4.77 $8.81 11.92% $7.76 $1.15 $61.95 $4.20 8.0 0.54 RTA-27 Total $109.37 $5.39 $6.50 15.80% $5.47 $0.40 $92.08 $4.54 16.8 0.83 RTA-29 Total $109.38 $6.72 $7.31 13.31% $6.34 $1.26 $94.81 $5.83 15.0 0.92 RTA-3 Total $70.34 $5.26 $7.57 13.57% $6.54 $0.96 $60.79 $4.54 9.3 0.69 RTA-30 Total $70.34 $6.39 $7.04 13.35% $6.10 $0.92 $60.95 $5.53 10.0 0.91 RTA-31 Total $70.35 $4.27 $5.49 18.26% $4.49 $0.66 $57.51 $3.49 12.8 0.78 RTA-32 Total $70.36 $6.61 $4.89 18.92% $3.96 $0.59 $57.04 $5.36 14.4 1.35 RTA-33 Total $70.34 $5.37 $8.89 10.81% $7.93 $1.17 $62.73 $4.79 7.9 0.60 RTA-35 Total $70.34 $3.09 $7.21 13.12% $6.26 $0.92 $61.10 $2.68 9.8 0.43 RTA-40 Total $70.34 $3.94 $10.15 10.85% $9.05 $1.33 $62.71 $3.51 6.9 0.39 RTA-41C Total $70.34 $3.93 $10.92 8.43% $10.00 $1.48 $64.40 $3.60 6.4 0.36 RTA-41D Total $109.35 $6.88 $5.66 15.76% $4.77 $0.95 $92.11 $5.80 19.3 1.22 RTA-42 Total $70.34 $4.50 $8.03 10.88% $7.16 $1.07 $62.68 $4.01 8.8 0.56 RTA-49 Total $109.37 $9.22 $4.65 20.50% $3.70 $0.74 $86.94 $7.33 23.5 1.98 RTA-50 Total $70.34 $10.83 $13.81 96.46% $0.49 $0.07 $2.49 $0.38 5.1 0.78 RTA-51 Total $70.42 $6.75 $4.17 88.02% $0.50 $0.07 $8.43 $0.81 16.9 1.62 RTA-54C Total $70.36 $8.70 $77.96 101.91% ($1.50) ($0.22) ($1.35) ($0.17) 0.9 0.11 RTA-55 Total $70.31 $5.42 $3.08 19.67% $2.47 $0.36 $56.48 $4.35 22.8 1.76 RTA-61 Total $70.34 $3.91 $8.24 13.37% $7.14 $1.05 $60.93 $3.38 8.5 0.47 RTA-7 Total $70.34 $4.79 $5.91 17.11% $4.90 $0.73 $58.30 $3.97 11.9 0.81 RTA-74 Total $70.34 $4.08 $6.12 16.14% $5.13 $0.75 $58.98 $3.42 11.5 0.67 RTA-79 Total $70.34 $4.04 $9.34 13.90% $8.04 $1.18 $60.56 $3.48 7.5 0.43 RTA-794 Total 100.00% RTA-8 Total $70.34 $3.87 $5.41 20.02% $4.32 $0.64 $56.26 $3.09 13.0 0.72 RTA-Ba/Bea Total $62.02 $2.53 $24.72 14.03% $21.25 $1.80 $53.32 $2.17 2.5 0.10 RTA-GT DAR Total $62.04 $2.99 $33.88 8.62% $30.96 $2.62 $56.69 $2.73 1.8 0.09 RTA-Hemet Total $62.04 $3.57 $22.02 16.59% $18.37 $1.56 $51.75 $2.98 2.8 0.16 TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 5 of 6 Riverside Transit Agency Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2013/14 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile RTA-Jurupa Total $62.04 $3.36 $31.00 11.25% $27.52 $2.33 $55.06 $2.98 2.0 0.11 RTA-LakeEl Total $62.04 $3.05 $33.43 10.94% $29.77 $2.52 $55.25 $2.72 1.9 0.09 RTA-MurDAR Total $62.04 $3.25 $32.10 11.01% $28.56 $2.42 $55.21 $2.89 1.9 0.10 RTA-MV DAR Total $62.04 $3.54 $26.99 13.34% $23.39 $1.98 $53.76 $3.07 2.3 0.13 RTA-No/Co Total $62.04 $3.55 $24.51 16.41% $20.48 $1.74 $51.86 $2.97 2.5 0.14 RTA-Perris Total $62.04 $2.94 $30.46 11.80% $26.86 $2.28 $54.72 $2.60 2.0 0.10 RTA-RivDAR Total $62.04 $3.10 $30.82 12.64% $26.92 $2.28 $54.20 $2.71 2.0 0.10 RTA-Sun Ci Total $62.04 $3.11 $34.26 10.05% $30.82 $2.61 $55.80 $2.80 1.8 0.09 RTA-TaxiBB Total $79.25 $3.35 $53.33 8.37% $48.86 $4.14 $72.62 $3.07 1.5 0.06 RTA-TaxiGT Total $84.11 $3.32 $51.64 8.56% $47.21 $4.00 $76.90 $3.04 1.6 0.06 RTA-TaxiHe Total $77.38 $3.36 $64.79 5.89% $60.97 $5.17 $72.82 $3.16 1.2 0.05 RTA-TaxiJu Total $81.46 $3.34 $46.46 8.85% $42.35 $3.59 $74.25 $3.04 1.8 0.07 RTA-TaxiLE Total $93.82 $3.28 $64.11 7.03% $59.60 $5.05 $87.22 $3.05 1.5 0.05 RTA-TaxiMu Total $83.67 $3.33 $64.48 6.90% $60.02 $5.09 $77.89 $3.10 1.3 0.05 RTA-TaxiMV Total $64.16 $3.46 $42.94 9.33% $38.93 $3.30 $58.17 $3.14 1.5 0.08 RTA-TaxiNC Total $95.45 $3.27 $48.38 8.07% $44.47 $3.77 $87.74 $3.01 2.0 0.07 RTA-TaxiPe Total $76.42 $3.37 $40.56 8.59% $37.08 $3.14 $69.85 $3.08 1.9 0.08 RTA-TaxiRi Total $79.79 $3.35 $50.13 7.270/0 $46.48 $3.94 $73.99 $3.10 1.6 0.07 RTA-TaxiSC Total $72.68 $3.39 $51.89 8.25% $47.61 $4.03 $66.68 $3.11 1.4 0.07 SL-220 Total Service Provider Totals $87.02 $5.38 $6.74 22.88% $5.20 $0.74 $67.11 $4.15 12.9 0.80 TransTrack Manager'"' 5/23/2013 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2013/14 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Route # 1 Route Class Route Description I Cities/Communities Served Connections Directly Operated Fixed Routes: 1 Regional From UCR and Downtown Riverside to Galleria at Tyler and Corona primarily via University Ave and Magnolia Ave Riverside, UC Riverside campus area, Arlington, Home Gardens, Corona Metrolink, Corona Cruiser, Omnitrans, SunLine 10 Local From Big Springs St on Riverside's Northside to Galleria at Tyler primarily via Brockton St, Blaine St, Victoria Ave and Lincoln Ave Riverside, UC Riverside campus area, Casa Blanca, La Sierra, eastside of Riverside Omnitrans, SunLine 11 Local Circulator routings between Moreno Valley Mall and March Air Reserve Base primarily via Frederick St, Ironwood Ave, Heacock St and JFK Dr Moreno Valley, March Joint Powers Authority SunLine 12 Local From Stephens Ave and Center St on Riverside's Northside, through Downtown, then to Pierce St at Magnolia Ave via Magnolia Ave and Califomia Ave Riverside, La Sierra, and northside of Riverside Omnitrans, SunLine Omnitrans, SunLine Omnitrans, SunLine 13 Local From Spruce St and Atlanta Ave to Galleria at Tyler in Riverside via MLK Blvd, Arlington Ave, Central Ave and Tyler St Riverside, Hunter Park-Eastside, Arlanza and La Sierra 14 Local From Galleria at Tyler to Downtown Riverside via Indiana Ave and Brockton Ave, then to Loma Linda VA Hospital via Fwy 215 and 10 Riverside, Casa Blanca, Highgrove, Grand Terrace, Colton, Loma Linda 15 Local From Downtown Riverside to Galleria at Tyler to Pierce St and Sterling Ave via Magnolia Ave, Arlington Ave, La Sierra Ave and Indiana Ave Riverside, Arlanza and La Sierra Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine, OCTA 16 Local From Moreno Valley Mall to Main Stand Russell St in Riverside via Day St, Sycamore Canyon Blvd, Box Springs Rd and University Ave Moreno Valley, Riverside, Canyon Crest, Riverside Eastside, UC Riverside campus Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 18 Local From RCC Moreno Valley campus to Moreno Valley Mall and Heacock via Sunnymead Ranch, Cottonwood St and schools along Frederick St, Perris Blvd, Pigeon Pass Rd and Kitching St Moreno Valley SunLine 19 Regional From Moreno Valley Mall to Perris Transit Center via Perris Blvd and Sunnymead Blvd Moreno Valley, Perris SunLine 20 Regional From Jurupa Ave and Birch St in Riverside to RCC Moreno Valley campus via Central Ave, Alessandro Blvd and Iris St Riverside, Moreno Valley, Mission Grove 21 ' Local From Galleria At Tyler in Riverside to Country Village in Mira Loma via Van Buren Blvd and Mission Blvd Jurupa, Glen Avon, Pedley, Riverside 22 Regional From the Lake Elsinore Outlet Mall to Downtown Riverside Terminal via Hwy 74, Old Elsinore Rd and Alessandro Blvd Riverside, Woodcrest, Mead Valley, Perris, Meadowbrook, Lake Elsinore Omnitrans, SunLine 27 Regional From Florida Ave and Lincoln Ave in East Hemet to Galleria at Tyler in Riverside via Florida Ave, 215 Fwy and Van Buren Blvd Riverside, Woodcrest, Perris, Sun City, Menifee, Romoland, Hemet, Valle Vista 29 Regional From the Downtown Riverside Terminal to Hamner Ave and Limonite Ave in in Eastvale via Rubidoux Blvd and Limonite Ave Eastvale, Mira Loma, Pedley, Rubidoux, Riverside Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 41 1 Regional From the Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley with stops at RCC Moreno Valley campus and Riverside County Medical Center Moreno Valley, Perris, Mead Valley 49 Regional From the Downtown Riverside Terminal to Country Village via Mission Blvd Mira Loma, Glen Avon, Rubidoux, Riverside, Jurupa Omnitrans, SunLine 206 1 Express From Promenade Mall in Temecula to Corona Metrolink Station via Fwy 15 with stops in Murrieta and Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Temecula, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Corona Metrolink, Corona Cruiser 208 Express From Promenade Mall in Temecula to Riverside Metrolink Station and Downtown Terminal via 215 Fwy with stops in Murrieta, Sun City, Perris, Moreno Valley Temecula, Murrieta, Sun City, Perris, Riverside, Moreno Valley Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 216 Express From the Downtown Riverside Terminal to Village at Orange via 91 and 55 Fwy Riverside, Corona, Orange Metrolink, Omnitrans, OCTA, Corona Cruiser 2171 Express From San Jacinto and Hemet to Temecula and Escondido Hemet, San Jacinto, Temecula, Escondido NCTD (Bus, Sprinter Rail), MTS (San Diego) This route has selected trips that are directly operated and contract operated. 2 Rural areas are those with less than 50,000 in population. Revised 5/13/2013 Table 3A Individual Route Description RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2013/14 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Route # I Route Classy Route Description I Cities/Communities Served Connections Contracted Fixed Routes: 3 Local 10th Stand Belle Ave in Corona via Main Stand Hamner Ave to North Main Metrolink Station and Norco College, continuing to Eastvale Riverside, La Sierra, Norco, Corona, Eastvale, Mira Loma Metrolink, Corona Cruiser 7 Local Lake Elsinore Outlet Center, Downtown Lake Elsinore, Senior Center, Walmart shopping Center, Inland Valley Medical Center in Wildomar Lake Elsinore, Lakeland Village, Sedco Hills, Wildomar 8 Local From Lake Elsinore Outlet Center to Walmart on Railroad Canyon Rd via Grand Ave, Wildomar and Canyon Estates Dr Lake Elsinore, Sedco Hills, Wildomar 19' Local From Perris Transit Center to Exceed Facility in Homeland, and from Perris Transit Center to Perris Fairgrounds via Perris Boulevard Perris, Romoland 21 ' Local From Galleria At Tyler in Riverside to Country Village in Mira Loma via Van Buren Blvd and Mission Blvd Jurupa, Glen Avon, Pedley, Riverside 23 Local From Inland Valley Hospital in Wildomar through Murrieta to County Center Dr in Temecula Murrieta, Wildomar, Temecula 24 Local Temecula local route with stops at County Center Dr, Old Town, Library, Pechanga Resort and Temecula Walmart Temecula, Pechanga Community 30 Local Perris local circulator serving the Perris Transit Center, Walmart and central part of the community Perris 31 Rural Service from Banning to Hemet Valley Mall via Lamb Canyon, State St, Mt San Jacinto Community College Banning, Beaumont, Gilman Hot Springs, San Jacinto, Hemet Pass Transit 32 Local From Hemet Valley Mall to Mt. San Jacinto College via Downtown San Jacinto and San Jacinto Ave San Jacinto, Hemet 33 Local From Super-Walmart and Hemet Valley Mall in western Hemet to east Hemet Hemet, Valle Vista 35 Regional From Banning to Moreno Valley Mall with stops at K-Mart, Walmart on Moreno Beach Dr, senior center and Riverside County Medical Center Banning, Beaumont, Moreno Valley Pass Transit, SunLine 40 Local From Walmart in Lake Elsinore to Cherry Hills Blvd in Sun City with stops in Canyon Lake and Quail Valley Menifee, Sun City, Quail Valley, Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore 41 ' Regional From the Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley with stops at RCC Moreno Valley campus and Riverside County Medical Center Moreno Valley, Perris, Mead Valley 42 Local From Hemet Valley Mall to Soboba Casino in San Jacinto via Kirby St, San Jacinto Community Center, and San Jacinto Walmart Hemet, San Jacinto 50 Trolley Riverside downtown Jury Trolley Service Downtown Riverside, RCC Campus area 51 Trolley Crest Cruiser, a UCR to Canyon Crest circulator via Chicago Ave, Central Ave and Canyon Crest Dr Riverside, UC Riverside campus area SunLine 54 Local Downtown Riverside circulator between the the Commerce Street Metrolink Parking Lot to the County Administrative Building Riverside Metrolink 55 Trolley Temecula Trolley route, connecting Harveston community to schools, shops and other RTA routes Temecula 61 Regional From Cherry Hills Blvd and Bradley Rd in Menifee to the Promenade Mall area in Temecula with stops at MSJC Menifee campus, Loma Linda University Medical Center - Murrieta, and County Center Dr Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Sun City 74 Regional From San Jacinto and Hemet to Menifee and Perris, serving MSJC San Jacinto campus, Hemet Valley Mall, Winchester, and MSJC Menifee campus San Jacinto, Hemet, Winchester, Menifee, Sun City, Perris 79 Regional From Hemet Valley Mall to Temecula City Hall via Winchester Rd (State Hwy79). Also serves County Center Dr, Promenade Mall, Old Town Temecula and Temecula City Hall Hemet, Winchester, French Valley, Murrieta and Temecula 202 Express From Walmart in Murrieta and Promenade Mall in Temecula to Oceanside Transit Center Murrieta, Temecula, Fallbrook, Bonsai!, Oceanside Metrolink, NCTD (Bus, Coaster Rail, Sprinter Rail) 204' Express From UC Riverside campus to Montclair TransCenter via Riverside Downtown Terminal. Country Villaae and Ontario Riverside, Ontario, Glen Avon, Montclair Metrolink, Omnitrans, Foothill Transit. SunLine 206' Express From Promenade Mall in Temecula to Corona Metrolink Station via 1-15 with stops in Murrieta and Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Temecula, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Corona Metrolink, Corona Cruiser 208 Express From Promenade Mall in Temecula to Riverside Metrolink Station and Downtown Terminal via 1-215 with stops in Murrieta, Menifee/Sun City, Perris, Moreno Valley Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee/Sun City, Perris, Riverside, Moreno Valley Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 210 Express From Banning and Beaumont to Downtown Riverside Terminal with stops in Moreno Valley and Riverside Metrolink Station Banning, Beaumont, Moreno Valley, Riverside Metrolink, Pass Transit, Omnitrans, SunLine 212 Express From Hemet and San Jacinto to Riverside Downtown Terminal with stops at Perris and UC Riverside San Jacinto, Hemet, Perris, Riverside Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 217' Express From San Jacinto and Hemet to Temecula and Escondido San Jacinto, Hemet, Temecula, Escondido NCTD (Bus, Sprinter Rail), MTS (Bus) ' This route has selected trips that are directly operated and contract operated. Revised 5/13/2013 Table 3A Individual Route Description RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2013/14 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Route # Route Class Route Description Cities/Communities Served Connections Contracted Paratransit Routes: Banning/Beaumont Origin -to -Destination Banning and Beaumont Lake Elsinore Origin -to -Destination Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, Wildomar, Quail Valley Highgrove/Loma Linda Origin -to -Destination Grand Terrace, Highgrove, Lama Linda, Colton Hemet Origin -to -Destination Hemet, Homeland, Romoland, San Jacinto, Valle Vista, Winchester Jurupa Origin -to -Destination Glen Avon, Bel!town, Jurupa, Pedley, Rubidoux, Mira Loma (Country Village) Moreno Valley Origin -to -Destination Moreno Valley, March Air Reserve Base Murrieta/Temecula Origin -to -Destination Murrieta, Temecula Corona/Norco Origin -to -Destination Corona, Norco Perris Origin -to -Destination Perris, Mead Valley, Nuevo Riverside Origin -to -Destination Riverside, Canyon Crest, Arnold Heights, Orangecrest, Woodcrest Sun City Origin -to -Destination Sun City, Menifee Taxicab Origin -to -Destination within RTA service area Revised 5/13/2013 Table 3A Individual Route Description Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 Final Pass 5/22/13 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2013/14 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Project Description Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Measure A Operating Assistance 3 Measure A Operating Assistance RCTC Reserves 5 Section 5307 - Riv-San Bernardino 5 Section 5307 . Murrieta/ Temecula/ Menifee 5 Section 5307 - Hemet 2, 5 Section 5307 Carryover s Section 5309 Carryover Section 5311 3 TUMF Carryover 1 Section 5316 JARC 1 Section 5317 New Freedom Prop 1 B PTMISEA Prop 1 B Security Farebox Other Revenue Operating Assistance 5 32,998,975 29,228,975 1,645,000 1,700,000 425,000 Operating Assistance - CTSA 686,000 686,000 GASB 43/45 ARC 1,350,000 1,350,000 OCTA 794 124,000 124,000 JARC CommuterLink 212 & 217 1 975,399 447,506 130,001 235,000 162,892 JARC Fixed Route Service' 773,651 568,451 43,200 135,000 27,000 County Shuttle Route 54 6 111,007 111,007 Farebox (Cash, Tix, Passes) 10,265,742 10,265,742 Travel Training' 162,068 45,068 13,000 52,000 52,000 COA/BRT Study 3 430,000 107,500 161,250 161,250 Federal Excise Tax Credit 400,000 400,000 Interest Income 20,000 20,000 Advertising Revenue 15,000 15,000 CNG Sales 50,000 50,000 Medi-Cal Reimbursement' 400,000 200,000 200,000 Retiree Medical PAY Go 200,000 200,000 Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 5 7,020,000 1,420,000 4,200,000 1,200,000 200,000 Capital Cost of Contracting 5 5,200,000 740,000 2,200,000 1,500,000 760,000 Subtotal: Operating $61,181,842 $34,000,000 $0 $2,752,208 $107,500 $6,400,000 $2,700,000 $1,700,000 $960,000 $161,250 $425,000 $161,250 $422,000 $52,000 $0 $0 $10,455,634 $885,000 Revenue Vehicles - DO Heavy Duty FY14-1 9,004,815 (1,163,866) (3,175,634) 13,344,315 Replacement Revenue Vehicles - (13) COFR FY14-2 2,371,720 403,192 1,968,528 Expansion Revenue Vehicles - (2) COFR FY14-3 364,880 62,030 302,850 Capitalized Tire Lease FY14-4 399,619 79,924 319,695 Associated Transit Improvements FY14-5 250,000 200,000 50,000 Maintenance/Support Equipment FY14-6 34,600 6,920 27,680 Travel Training - Furniture/IT Equip' - - Information Systems - ITS 4 FY14-7 4,339,500 1,163,866 3,175,634 Ops & Facilities Security Projects FY14-8 894,790 894,790 Subtotal: Capital $17,659,924 $0 $752,066 $0 $0 $1,968,528 $700,225 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,344,315 $894,790 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $78,841,766 $34,000,000 $752,066 $2,752,208 $107,500 $8,368,528 $3,400,225 $1,700,000 $960,000 $161,250 $425,000 $161,250 $422,000 $52,000 $13,344,315 $894,790 $10,455,634 $885,000 JARC/NF funds reflect funding from current executed grants only. New JARC/NF funds approved by RCTC in April are not included here. However, the local match for the new approved amounts are included for Commuterlink 212/217 and Travel Training as these projects are currently operating and their scopes will continue in FY14. New Extended Hours service funding and deployment as approved in the call is not included here as service will not commence until Federal funding is secured. 2 5307 estimated carryover from FY13 grant CA-90-Z034 which has not been awarded due to DOL objection based on 13(c) will impact operating LTF negatively. 3 COA Study to use $430,000 of previously programmed 5309, TUMF and Measure A funds. 4 ITS Enhancement/Expansion for entire RTA fixed route fleet to be funded from programmed 40' bus funding. 5 New 5307 funding per RCTC guidance; funding is at risk (timing) due to 13(c) issue; lack of funding availability will impact operating LTF negatively and capital STA/LTF negatively. 6 Route 54 is funded by Western Riverside Measure A Highway funds. 7 Medi-Cal Reimbursement funds are not allowable revenue for Farebox Recovery Ratio. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-1 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles — Heavy Duty Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of heavy duty buses to be used for directly operated fixed routes. These buses have estimated service life of 12 years or 500,000 miles. Note: Prop1B and FET Credit funds can be used for alternative revenue vehicles/revenue vehicle related expenses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The new buses will replace the old NA81 model buses that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 Prop 18 PTMISEA $ 13, 344, 315 LTF $ (1,163, 8661 STA $ (3,175, 634) Total $ 9,004,815 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-04-0154 Heavy Duty Buses $ 1,400,000 CA-58-0017 *** Heavy Duty Buses 2,400,000 CA-90-Z034 *** Heavy Duty Buses 3,000,000 CA-90-Y614 Heavy Duty Buses 219,842 Prop 1 B PTMISEA Heavy Duty Buses 19,166, 022 FY08,12,13 STA Heavy Duty Buses 15, 612,002 FY12, 13 LTF Heavy Duty Buses 15,499,644 FET Credit Heavy Duty Buses 2,022,828 Total $ 59,320,338 * As of 4/22/13 *** At risk, not approved. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-2 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contracted Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (13) Aero Elite vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for contract operated fixed routes that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 Sec 5307 $ 1,968,528 STA $ 403,192 Total $ 2,371,720 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z034 *** FY13 STA (7) COFR Aero Elite $ 1,176, 088 N/A FY12 STA (9) Med Duty Aero Elite 61,856 Total $ 1,237,944 As of 4/22/13 *** At risk, not approved. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-3 PROJECT NAME Expansion Revenue Vehicles for Contracted Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (2) Aero Elite vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Expansion of fleet to meet service demands. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 Sec 5307 $ 302,850 S TA $ 62,030 Total $ 364,880 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* None As of 4/22/13 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-4 PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected and replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 Sec 5307 $ 319,695 S TA $ 79,924 Total $ 399,619 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z034 *** FY13 STA Capitalized Tire Lease $ 263,617 * As of 4/22/13 *** At risk, not approved. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-5 PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 Sec 5307 $ 50,000 STA $ 200,000 Total $ 250,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z034 *** FY13 STA TE-Bus Stop Amenities $ 150,000 * As of 4/22/13 *** At risk, not approved. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-6 PROJECT NAME Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of support equipment items including, but not limited to, body shop heater, shop air compressors, scissors lift, mobility devices for training, portable crane, hand jacks. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 Sec 5307 $ 27,680 S TA $ 6,920 Total $ 34,600 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z043 *** FY13 STA Support Equipment $ 145,650 As of 4/22/13 *** At risk, not approved. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-7 PROJECT NAME Information Systems - ITS PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of ITS System for directly and contract operated fixed route vehicles to include CAD/IVL, APC, ATIS, customer Wi-Fi and remote CCTV access. NOTE: Funding is LTF and STA re -programmed from Heavy Duty Bus Replacement PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers and software to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 LTF $ 1,163,866 STA $ 3,175, 634 Total $ 4,339,500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* None * As of 4/22/13 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY14-8 PROJECT NAME Operations and Facilities Security Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Safety and security purchases for use at Agency facilities and on Agency vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Projects will improve and maintain the overall agency safety and security. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2014 Prop 18 CTSGP $ 894,790 $ - Total $ 894,790 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CalEma 6261-02 Security Projects $ 707,669 CalEma 6361-02 Security Projects $ 894,891 Total $1, 602, 560 As of 4/22/13 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2014/15 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2014/15 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Measure A Operating Assistance Section 5307 - Riv-San Bernardino Section 5307 - Temecula/ Murrieta Section 5307 - Hemet/San Jacinto Section 5311 Section 5316 JARC Section 5317 New Freedom Farebox / Other FY 2014/2015 _ Operating Assistance 38,532,674 34,182,674 2,200,000 1,700,000 450,000 GASB 43/45 Pre -funding 1,400,000 1,400,000 OCTA 794 130,000 130,000 JARC CommuterLink 212 & 217 895,665 258,987 121,876 380,862 133,940 JARC Fixed Route Service 1,000,506 307,949 144,917 452,865 94,775 County Shuttle Route 54 - - Farebox (Cash, Tix, Passes) 10,971,285 10,971,285 Travel Training 329,870 65,974 263,896 Federal Excise Tax Credit - - Interest Income 25,000 25,000 Advertising Revenue 15,000 15,000 CNG Sales 100,000 100,000 Medi-Cal Reimbursement 600,000 300,000 300,000 Retiree Medical PAY Go 1,000,000 1,000,000 Capitalized Preventative Maintenance 7,500,000 1,500,000 6,000,000 Capital Cost of Contracting 6,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 3,400,000 _ Subtotal: FY14/15 RTA Operating $68,500,000 $39,215,584 $0 $2,596,793 $7,400,000 $3,400,000 $1,700,000 $450,000 $833,727 $263,896 _ $12,640,000 Revenue Vehicles - (13) COFR FY15-1 2,371,720 403,192 1,968,528 Revenue Vehicles, Expansion - (5) DAR FY15-2 410,000 69,700 340,300 Revenue Vehicles - (51) DAR FY15-3 4,246,800 721,956 3,524,844 Revenue Vehicles - (8) Trolleys FY15-4 1,790,000 358,000 1,432,000 Non -Revenue Vehicles - (27) Support Vehicles FY15-5 853,200 170,640 682,560 Capital Maintenance Spares FY15-6 952,703 190,541 762,162 Capitalized Tire Lease FY15-7 292,500 58,500 234,000 Associated Transit Improvements FY15-8 250,000 50,000 200,000 Maintenance/Support Equipment FY15-9 100,000 20,000 80,000 Facility Maintenance FY15-10 116,200 23,240 92,960 Information Systems FY15-11 132,813 26,563 106,250 Ops & Facilities Security Projects FY15-12 911,880 911,880 Subtotal: FY14/15 Capital $12,427,816 $0 $2,092,332 $0 $9,423,604 $0 $0� $0 $0 $0 $911,880 1 Total: Operating & Capital FY14/15 $80,927,816 $39,215,584 $2,092,332 $2,596,793 $16,823,604 $3,400,000 $1,700,000 $450,000 $833,727 $263,896 $13,551,880 Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-1 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contracted Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (13) Aero Elite vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for contract operated fixed routes that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 1,968,528 STA $ 403,192 Total $ 2,371,720 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* Table 5.1A - Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-2 PROJECT NAME Expansion Revenue Vehicles for Demand Response Service PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (5) Type ll vehicles for use on demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Expansion of fleet to meet service demands. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 340,300 STA $ 69,700 Total $ 410,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE - OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED - INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-3 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Demand Response PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (51) Type ll vehicles for use on demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for demand response service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 3,524,844 STA $ 721,956 Total $ 4,246,800 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-4 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contracted Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (8) trolleys for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace trolleys used for contract operated fixed routes that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 1,432,000 STA $ 358,000 Total $ 1,790,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-5 PROJECT NAME Replacement Support Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replace (27) support vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace support cars and trucks that have met their useful life. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 682, 560 STA $ 170,640 Total $ 853,200 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-6 PROJECT NAME Capital Maintenance Spares PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of spare parts for rolling stock under the maintenance program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Purchase of vehicle parts based on projected needs whose individual costs meet the requirement for capital reimbursement. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 762,162 STA $ 190,541 Total $ 952,703 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/5-7 PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires for FY2015. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected and replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 234,000 S TA $ 58,500 Total $ 292,500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-8 PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 200,000 STA $ 50,000 Total $ 250,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-9 PROJECT NAME Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of maintenance and support equipment. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20,000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME FY15-10 Facility Maintenance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Miscellaneous facility maintenance. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Facility maintenance and equipment and improvements to promote a safe and clean environment. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 92,960 STA $ 23,240 Total $ 116,200 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-11 PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of information systems hardware and software. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers, equipment and software needed to replace old equipment, to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Sec 5307 $ 106,250 STA $ 26,563 Total $ 132,813 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY15-12 PROJECT NAME Operations and Facilities Security Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Safety and security purchases for use at Agency facilities and on Agency vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Projects will improve and maintain the overall agency safety and security. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2015 Prop 18 CTSGP $ 911,880 $ - Total $ 911,880 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Riverside Transit Agency FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Measure A Operating Assistance Section 5307 - Riv-San Bernardino Section 5307 - Temecula/ Murrieta Section 5307 - Hemet/San Jacinto Section 5311 Section 5316 JARC Section 5317 New Freedom Farebox / Other FY 2015/2016 _ Operating Assistance 42,343,000 37,893,000 2,300,000 1,700,000 450,000 GASB 43/45 Pre -funding 1,500,000 1,500,000 OCTA 794 132,000 132,000 JARC CommuterLink 212 & 217 1,000,000 282,200 132,800 415,000 170,000 JARC Fixed Route Service 1,000,000 307,700 144,800 452,500 95,000 County Shuttle Route 54 - Farebox (Cash, Tix, Passes) 10,985,000 10,985,000 Travel Training 350,000 70,000 280,000 Federal Excise Tax Credit - - Interest Income 25,000 25,000 Advertising Revenue 15,000 15,000 CNG Sales 100,000 100,000 Medi-Cal Reimbursement 600,000 300,000 300,000 Retiree Medical PAY Go 1,000,000 1,000,000 Capitalized Preventative Maintenance 8,000,000 1,600,000 6,400,000 Capital Cost of Contracting 6,250,000 1,250,000 1,600,000 3,400,000 _ Subtotal: FY15/16 RTA Operating $73,300,000 $43,202,900 $0 $2,709,600 $8,000,000 $3,400,000 $1,700,000 $450,000 $867,500 $280,000 _ $12,690,000 Revenue Vehicles - (2) Trolleys FY16-1 466,400 93,280 373,120 Non -Revenue Vehicles - (4) Support Vehicles FY16-2 164,160 32,832 131,328 Capital Maintenance Spares FY16-3 324,000 64,800 259,200 Capitalized Tire Lease FY16-4 292,500 58,500 234,000 Associated Transit Improvements FY16-5 250,000 50,000 200,000 Maintenance/Support Equipment FY16-6 100,000 20,000 80,000 Facility Maintenance FY16-7 100,000 20,000 80,000 Information Systems FY16-8 50,000 10,000 40,000 Subtotal: FY15/16 Capital $1,747,060 $0 $349,412 $0 $1,397,648 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 Total: Operating & Capital FY15/16 $75,047,060 $43,202,900 $349,412 $2,709,600 $9,397,648 $3,400,000 $1,700,000 , $450,000 $867,500 $280,000 $12,690,000 Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-1 PROJECT NAME Replacement Trolleys for Contracted Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (2) trolleys for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace trolleys used for contract operated fixed routes. These vehicles have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 373,120 S TA $ 93,280 Total $ 466,400 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/6-2 PROJECT NAME Replacement Support Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replace (4) support vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace support cars and trucks that have met their useful life. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 131,328 S TA $ 32,832 Total $ 164,160 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/6-3 PROJECT NAME Capital Maintenance Spares PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of spare parts for rolling stock under the maintenance program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Purchase of vehicle parts based on projected needs whose individual costs meet the requirement for capital reimbursement. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 259,200 STA $ 64,800 Total $ 324,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/6-4 PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires for FY2016. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected and replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 234,000 STA $ 58,500 Total $ 292,500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-5 PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 200,000 STA $ 50,000 Total $ 250,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-6 PROJECT NAME Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of maintenance and support equipment. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20,000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME FY16-7 Facility Maintenance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Miscellaneous facility maintenance. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Facility maintenance and equipment and improvements to promote a safe and clean environment. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20,000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-8 PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of information systems hardware software. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers, equipment and software needed to replace old equipment, to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 40,000 STA $ 10,000 Total $ 50,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED — INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None TABLE 6 — PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2006/07 — FY 2009/10) Action(s) Taken And Results To Date No Audit Findings Table 6-Triennial Audit FY 2014-16 SRTP Riverside Transit Agency Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review Riverside Transit Agency Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 8,735,044 Passenger Miles 61,275,711 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 666,566.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 11,150,603.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 13,504,857.0 Total Operating Expenses $58,073,468 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $14,251,746 Net Operating Expenses $43,821,722 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 24.54% I >= 17.49% I 30.76% I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $87.12 <_ $82.15 $79.72 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $5.02 >_ $3.56 and <_ $4.82 $3.97 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.72 >_ $0.51 and <_ $0.69 $0.57 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $65.74 >_ $50.14 and <_ $67.84 $55.20 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $3.93 >_ $2.99 and <_ $4.05 $3.43 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 13.10 >= 11.99 and <= 16.22 13.90 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.78 >= 0.71 and <= 0.97 0.87 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: TransTrack Manager"' 5/23/2013 Page 1 of I Riverside Transit Agency FY 2013/14 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; Riverside Transit Agency All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2011/12 End of Year Actual FY 2012/13 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2013/14 Plan FY 2013/14 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 8,800,275 6,908,921 9,080,868 None Passenger Miles 61,523,259 48,262,267 63,375,753 None Revenue Hours 625,224.8 496,547.8 703,065.0 None Total Hours 740,591.4 565,057.5 831,867.0 None Revenue Miles 10,442,450.1 7,981,217.7 11,380,664.0 None Total Miles 12,796,329.5 9,797,256.2 13,939,195.0 None Operating Costs $49,026,252 $39,583,416 $61,181,842 None Passenger Revenue $13,246,856 $12,173,998 $14,000,342 None Operating Subsidy $35,779,396 $27,409,418 $47,181,500 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $78.41 $79.72 $87.02 <_ $81.49 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $4.69 $4.96 $5.38 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $5.57 $5.73 $6.74 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 27.02% 30.76% 22.88% >= 17.5% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $4.07 $3.97 $5.20 >_ $3.37 and <_ $4.57 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.58 $0.57 $0.74 >_ $0.48 and <_ $0.66 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $57.23 $55.20 $67.11 >_ $46.92 and <_ $63.48 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $3.43 $3.43 $4.15 >_ $2.92 and <_ $3.94 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 14.10 13.90 12.90 >= 11.82 and <= 15.99 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.84 0.87 0.80 >= 0.74 and <= 1.00 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2013/14 Plan to the FY 2013/14 Primary Target. TransTrack Manager"" 5/23/2013 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 9A — HIGHLIGHTS OF SRTP Operating & Financial Data FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 Estimate FY13/14 Planned Systemwide Ridership 7,934,079 8,092,220 8,800,273 8,872,922 9,080,868 Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $75.81 $75.96 $78.41 $82.12 $87.02 Recent Trends: • RTA has seen record breaking ridership for the second fiscal year in a row. Furthermore, for 10 out of the last 12 months, RTA has seen the highest ridership in history for those particular months. Proposed Service Changes for FY14: • Service changes will continue to focus on refining existing service through improved scheduling, streamlining, and better serving communities with the available resources. • Other proposed service changes include: route and schedule maintenance, the reinstatement of three (3) holidays (Memorial Day, Independence Day, and Labor Day) beginning September 2013, later service on major routes serving colleges and universities. • A COA study will be completed in 2014 and will serve as a blueprint of service enhancements for the next five to ten years. Operating Budget ($61,181,842): • Increase of 5.4%over FY13 budget. Variance analysis by cost element is provided below.. o Salaries — 5.6% increase due to annual ization of positions added in FY13, modest headcount growth and wage increases per contract. o Benefits — 8.2% increase due to increases in OPEB ARC and medical insurance costs. o Services — 22.8% increase due to COA, Bus costs. Branding, and professional services o Materials & Supplies —10.5%decrease due to parts usage reduction. o Purchased Transportation — 3.8% increase due to service increase, contracted rates and fuel. Capital Budget ($17,659,924): • RTAs 3-Year Capital Improvement Plan (GP) is updated to reflect the current economic outlook and service needs with a focus on items which are mandatory to support our current service profile. FY14 G P projects are funded with Prop 1 B PTMISEA and CTSGP funds, Federal Section 5307, and State Transportation Assistance by project element for FY14 is shown below. (STA). Asur1rr>dry o Revenue Vehicles - $11.7 million for 40 ft. bu,,cs and (15) Contracted Fixed Route bu ;ce. o IT - $4.3 million for ITS Enhancer ent/Expansion for fixed route fleet. o Facilities - $.9 million for operations and facilities security projects o Maintenance - $.4 million for tire lease and equipment. o Associated Transit Improvements - $.2 million for bus stop enhancements. Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2011/12 Audit FY 12/13 (Estimate) FY 13/14 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 10,239,289 10,500,000 10,455,634 2.Interest 13. General Fund Supplement 4. Measure A 2,450,685 2,575,000 2,859,708 5. Advertising Revenue 17,468 17,500 15,000 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets 15,993 7. CNG Revenue 220,625 140,000 50,000 18. Lease/ Other Revenue 2,500 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund 1,465,000 400,000 10. Investment Income 73,327 45,000 20,000 11. CalPers CERBT 213,802 483,750 200,000 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes 13. Other Revenues 13,171 - TOTAL REVENUE 13,246,860 15,226,250 14,000,342 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 49,026,261 55,000,000 61,181,842 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 27.02% 27.68% 22.88% APPENDIX A: RTA SYSTEM MAP AND FIXED ROUTE MAPS 4%. „„„r=1 muounua Mg= MINITIESIERIER ITRITERREICI CRIETIIKIFERISEI IMEMSIOROMIZEJ JURUPA VALLEY 1 ILLIRA Loma rk Lon. HOME GARDENS sr,T" EMOMMEROMO RIVERSIDE EMEIEMOMME MEMOREIEE 1=1 Riverside Transit Agency System Map =rtre°r'sfdeTransit.com Welcome aboard the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), your community transportation provider. The RTA operates 45 bus routes to provide you with safe, cost-effective and reliable service in western Riverside County. We hope that this System Map is useful to you in planning your trip. Should you need additional information, please call the Customer Information Center at 1-800-800.7821 or (951)565-5002. MAP NOT TO SCALE CD Route Number 0 Point of Interest 7 Interstate Route Path 0 Medical Facility • State Highway waraa Commuter Routing ci) Transfer Point Main Road an= Alternate Routing Metrolink Station Water OWE SO Airy Trolley ITILUESOUR LC" side Trolley 1FILILACIMA LOMA LINDA QUAIL VALLEY rat ArwoN LAKE ROUTE St EMBROZZZMI MEE LAKE ELSINORE niEnnaIDE dri PERRIS REIMIEMEIES CIES 1MENIFEE k.orgr MURRIETA1 MOMIMEME IMMO WINCHESTER TEMECULA ROUTESI eresIGniise =MIMI MEEMMIE Kew CANYON CREST Nhe WOODGREST HIGHGROVE =MIEN= MEIER! IMMTE0 MEAD `7,71:" VALLEY AKEADOWITROOK • -TROLLEY • KNEE= CIRO MEIMM 21=111 MEIMESECIES RIVERSIDE o u TOWN MOMEMIMIEE EZEIMEEM HEMET FRENCH VALLEY MORERMERBEE Temec I • Trolle ROUTE ss Temecula Treley Z4t, rIX,Peorats` EIMAILNK MEITIMIESHM SHEOL TEMECULA i UCR / Riverside Downtown Terminal to W. Corona Metrolink Station Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: RCC, California Baptist University, Parkview Community Hospital, Galleria at Tyler, Kaiser Hospital, Corona. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. iverside Downtown Terminal 1 10 12 13 14 15 16 22 29 49 204 208 210 212 216 Omnitrans215 1 SunLine 220 T Riverside - DowntownMetrolinkStation 0 16 208 210 EVEI SunLine 220 Amtrak T Brockton Arcade 0 10 m® Riverside Downtown • Terminal T8 Riverside City College 74th St. Riverside Community Hospital RIVERSIDE ME T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 T 6th & Main 1 3 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red La Sierra '. University • T 6th & Smith 0 Corona Cruiser Red West Corona Metrolink Station Smith ROLINK E 1 _> T Auto Center 2 14 Civk . 5` an Central 3rd 0 R Mission inn University 70 i 6 Ramona H.S. Adams Parkview Hospital California 3Wen O Baptist University Chemawa Middle School 0 Tyler a Nov' • Glleria at Tyler c R? Prerr 3 T T c`' Corona Senior Ctr. Corona H.S. 5 4 Kaiser la Sierra Hospital McKinley 44 Q Z O CC CO V 0 T 9 METROLINK Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station Riverside Plaza Arlington Madison 0 T T UCR 0 Blain 16 o` UCR 204 210 SunLine 220 Magnolia & 14th 0®® 50 RTA and Corona Cruiser honor each other's Day and 30-Day passes at shared stops. • La Sierra & Magnolia 0®® T Magnolia & McKinley 0 Corona Cruiser Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility cmi:m Alternate Routing 3 Swan Lake/Pat's Ranch Rd to Belle & 10th Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Norco, Norco Senior Center, Norco City Hall, RCC, North Main Plaza, Corona. No service weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Swan Lake Dr EASTVALE E T 7 T Hamner & Limonite Limonite Ave 65th St. 68th St. s 6 Eleanor Roosevelt H.S. Citrus St DMV Post Office `"° DPSS O� \off City Hall Norco Senior Center Norco College 4 T North Main Plaza 5 3rd St. Target Corona Cruiser Blue T Belle & 10th Q Z O O v T Corona Cruiser Blue, Red 8th St. Senior Center T Library Stan Reynold Pkwy 1 Ontario T T 29 T 65th & Pat's Ranch Rd 29 Norco Library 6th St. 3 5th St. 4th St. Lampton 3rd St. 2nd St. North Main Plaza METROLINK 2• W.Gran Corona Transit Center Corona Mall T Main &6th I�© " Corona Regional Medical �¢• 10th St Center p. �a.4\ NORCO Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility Corona Transit Center 206 216 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red RTA and Corona Cruiser honor each other's Day and 30-Day passes at shared stops. 7 Lake Elsinore Outlet Center to Inland Valley Medical Center Information (enter (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rotas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O, N Also serving: DPSS, Downtown Lake Elsinore, Senior Center. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 3 Riverside Dr LAKE ELSINORE T Outlet (enter 0 8El 5 Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Prft <0 Senio Cente lake Dt T Malaga & Mission Trail 0 8 ott Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information O Medical Facility ® Alternate Routing LAKE ELSINORE T Walmart 0 8 40 Walmart d/ o3d^ ildp ee' Living 2 WILDOMAR T Qa - Ca T Inland Valley Medical Center ENKE T Palomar & Central 0 8 �a (0, 0 A,6 .10 `"P ityHallr a� 0 �� Q• JR Inland Valley Medical Center T 1 + 8 Lake Elsinore Walmart to Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. �o. O, N +a6`aa° .• G Lake Elsinore Recreation Center Ortega Highway Also serving: Stater Bros, Albertsons, Lake Elsinore Recreation Center. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Lake Elsinore Outlet Center d � Stater �' ono Bros $ O O Albertson Baldwin 6 74 4 c 9, LAKE ELSINORE Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing 7 T T Outlet Center 8 El 206 Chase Bank C' l d� �dfPsOO • lekes40,e0r Albertson 1 T c 0 6 r E Railroad Canyon Rd AP Walmart 2 M tiq Mission Trail Library A d/ 03 d r L¢�5� 3 T T Walmart 8 40 T Malaga & Mission Trail 8 15 • Palomar & Central • 8 WILDOMAR 10 Big Springs & Watkins to Galleria at Tyler Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. �O N Also serving: Downtown Riverside, Poly High, Gage Middle School, Notre Dame High, Calif. School for Deaf, Arlington High. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Riverside Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®®m ® 16 El 29 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 216 SunLine 220 T Brockton Arcade En 10 T Iowa & Blaine Ein RTA T 7 Riverside Downtown Terminal Riverside Community d College d m® Riverside Plaza Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information cM:=1 Alternate Routing T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®®m ®®® 216 m 10 8 pr ssionInn Ave pve96m nniveto 1AthSt o CAW •T T 5 Brockton Arcade a Ur h 6 n T 5� a N,1atWns UCR T County Administration Bldg ®® 10 210 Poly H.S. v.is. e804, Calif. Sch. otre for Deaf Dame H.S. Madison St Arlington onS H.S. t 81v s Galleria at Tyler 1 T 2 3 Q C WB Only Gage M.S. 54 208 Riverside STEM Academy SunLine 220 RIVERSIDE it Moreno Valley Mall/March ARB Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Also serving: Sunnymead Middle School, Moreno Valley High School. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Moreno Valley Mall m SunLine 220 Moreno Valley Mall Town Circle Towngate Blvd MORENO VALLEY T Alessandro & Frederick m March ARB City Hall O Delays may occur due to construction on Ironwood Ave. Ironwood Ave «Counter -clockwise I Clockwise» Sunnymead MS Eucalyptus Ave Moreno yalleyHS Cottonwood Ave k Alessandro Blvd Cactus Ave Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information Hemlock Post Office Sunnymead Blvd T Heacock & Sunnymead m T Cottonwood & Heacock m T Alessandro & Heacock m 20 JFK Dr a w 1 2 Stephens & Center to Pierce & Sterling - Riverside Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Q Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Galleria at Tyler, DMV, Downtown Terminal, Salvation Army. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. RIVERSIDE T Riverside Downtown Terminal 1 10 12 13 14 15 16 22 29 49 204 208 210 212 216 Ommtrans215 SunLine220 T Arlington & Streeter Ai Van Buren &California ®®® P, a� County Mental Health 4 County Juvenile Courts County Farm Rd Hole tea°° 2 P,• T 3 --"Hospital Kaiser f� T Garner Riverside y Downtown Terminal T T County Administration Bldg ®® Eal 10 210 Arlington a��tiOs a Juvenile Hall T 54 208 8^ SunLine 220 Jurupa Center N ' C(olumbia Russell t o` tst Salvation Army «Mission Inn University 0 G 14th Riverside City College 5 o��a �P T Galleria at Tyler En 10 El= ®®m Janet Goeske Ctr. Sears Hardman Center Riverside Plaza 0 216 Galleria at Tyler T Merced & Magnolia 0®® 14 DMV 6 7 T lurupa e04 045 T Magnolia & Elizabeth NM= 14 El s 20 RIVERSIDE Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information O Medical Facility m Alternate Routing 1 3 Spruce & Atlanta to Galleria at Tyler - Riverside Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Galleria at Tyler, DPSS (Tyler office), Riverside Airport, RCC, RTA Headquarters. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T T Iowa &Spruce ®® westbound-- T Chicago & University 0® 14 16 ® t County Administration Bldg 10 210 ®® 54 208 SunLine 220 T Riverside Downtown Terminal 15 16 22 204 208 210 29 49 212 216 Omnitrans215 SunLine220 T 5 Riverside Downtown Terminal Rai T 14th & Magnolia 0®® 50 RIVERSIDE T Arlington & Monroe ®® T Colorado & Van Buren ®I® Norte Vista H.S. sS\OA�o� P s� ova Ty` T 2 Wells Intermediate School DPSS Riverside Q�\r Airport T aP• 0 A toy' Ito • . \) 0 4114114 .3 d P 9 9� `6`4 A o Sierra o • Middle School o� t 3 Riverside City College Riverside Plaza i o� T (PS\ 2 a,Sa�JS Eastbound SO‘e John North H.S. �d 90 \essis A 6 Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information O Medical Facility ® Alternate Routing T Arlington&Tyler Galleria �a° at Tyler 1 1 T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®®m ®®® 216 14 Galleria at Tyler to Riverside Downtown Terminal to Loma Linda VA Hospital Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Galleria at Tyler, Riverside Auto Center, Calif. School for the Deaf, Riverside Medical Clinic, RCC. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. RTA DOES NOT SERVE MICHIGAN AVENUE. MICHIGAN AVENUE IS SERVED BYOMNITRANS' ROUTE 325. ROUTE 14 CONSTRUCTION DETOUR UNTIL 2014 T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®® ® 16 ® 29 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 SunLine 220 T Brockton Arcade 0 10 m® T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®®m ®®® az �Q ,P Galleria \ca at Tyler PALMYRUA AVE COLUMBIA AVE Riverside Downtown Terminal Riverside Community Hospital California School for the Deaf Madison T Loma Linda VA Hospital VA Hospital -oclP�e Loma Linda m University Medical Centee vto LOMA L I N D.Linda .•,*\Cammuy • •f CS Hospital Omnitrans 2, 325 GRAND TERRACE HIGHGROVE ♦ Michigan & Center Omnitrans 325 T Iowa & Blaine T University & Lemon 0 SunLine 220 RIVERSIDE Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility 15 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Pierce and Sterling Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y kudos son sujetos a cambios. �O N Also serving: Hardman Center, Riverside Airport, Metrolink, La Sierra, Cal. Paramedical College. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. ,,1,1 \0" T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal pio®® ®16El 29 14 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 216 SunLine 220 T 14th & Magnolia l0®® 50 Legend I Map not to scale iO Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility clm1 Alternate Routing 6 T Arlington & Van Buren Loma Vista Intermediate School . La Sierra Univ s Q`6( T 5 Norte Vista High P\\\te School T La Sierra & Hole ®® Hole LA Paramedical College SIERRA �d T La Sierra & Magnolia I® 1 12 La Sierra High School 1 r ��r 41111I'- do° yam. T � t 11, k,\) eC° s'G� •a � r Riverside City College Riverside Downtown Terminal •\OS'' T Brockton Arcade En 10 m® RIVERSIDE y Riverside Airport • 7 T T K-Mart T Arlington & Monroe ®® �a �a Kaiser lospital La Sierra Metrolink T 3 4 T * 10 RCH s Sears G'�G�c00 Galleria at Tyler T Arizona Middle School �a MBRONNK C� Hillcrest Q s°c High School o a 08 o� d T Riverside Plaza 9 5� Hardman Center o 'ro T Arlington&Streeter I®I® T Galleria at Tyler IO 10 1®I® 14 nsis* 216 T' La Sierra Metrolink I® OCTA 794 16 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Moreno Valley Mall Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. i O Also serving: Downtown, UCR, Canyon Crest Towne Center, Canyon Springs Plaza. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. MORENO VALLEY T University & Lemon 10 m 16 204 208 210 SunLine 220 T UCR 0 16 IN 204 210 SunLine 220 T 3 Market • 1 • Canyon Crest Vine UCR 2 Canyon Springs Plaza CL Ss\ Canyon Crest Towne Center TCircleown • • T Moreno Valley Mall m 4 Day St. m 0 a 16 18 19 208 210 SunLine 220 Moreno Valley Mall T Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station 0 16 208 210 • Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station METROLINK Riverside Downtown Terminal Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Weekdays Only SunLine 220 Amtrak RIVERSIDE iverside 1 Downtown 10 Terminal 12 13 14 15 16 22 29 49 204 208 210 212 216 Omnitrans215 SunLine 220 18 Sunnymead Ranch to Moreno Valley College Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. T Moreno Valley Mall m SunLine 220 Moreno Valley Mall Also serving: Moreno Valley Mall/Hometown Buffet, Canyon Springs High School, Sunnymead Ranch, Moreno Valley High School, Vista Del Lago High School, Riverside Community College. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Old Lake Rd v Vista Heights MS Canyon Springs HS d Moreno Valley HS Cottonwood T Cottonwood & Frederick m Sunnymead Ranch T Cottonwood & Heacock m NBONLY )) 6 Manzanita MORENO VALLEY Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information o>® Northbound Only Cottonwood O T Perris & Alessandro Vista Del Lago 1FK HS x Gentian Mary o Iris McLeod Bethune e.^ Moreno School Valley College Cahuilla» Vista Verde MS 79 Moreno Valley Mall to Perris Station Transit Center - Trumble Rd Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Moreno Valley Mall 8 • 70 Also serving: March Mountain High School, KC, Perris, Perris High School. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Circle — T Moreno Valley Mall SunLine 220 Centerpoint 7 Sunnymead Blvd T T Sunnymead & Heacock MORENO VALLEY T Perris & Ramona Expwy m 19 T Ross/Lowe's/Starcrest 19 41 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility a Alternate Routing a Long-term Detour Routing 3 March Mountain HS • . Ramona Expwy v Ross/Lowe's/ Starcrest s T 6 O T Perris & Alessandro 18 19 20 Alessandro ORCRMC Moreno Iris Valley College 5 • V 4 Morgan Val Verde a HS penis Valley Spectrum Walmart Orange Perris Plaza Perris Town Center PERRIS E San Jacinto T Perris Station Transit Center MIN 30m BEI Krameria rt Moreno Valley College 18 19 20 41 T Valley Plaza Hospital T 19 30 Valley Plaza Doctors Hospital Nuevo Temple Perris Christian HS HS Jarvis W 4th • • Perris Station Transit Center • Trumble Rd at EXCEED 1 74 ' zo Magnolia Center, RCR Med Ctr, MoVal Comm Hosp, Moreno Valley College Information Center (951)565.5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T RCRMC ®0 T Perris & Alessandro T Alessandro & Frederick m 20 T Central & Victoria 10 20 Victoria Magnolia» Birch Chicago Y Riverside Plaza Brockton Poly HS Nason» Perris Indian • . Frederick Day St. Moreno Beach RCRMC Lasselle City Hall Mission Grove Mission Grove Plaza Kaiser Permanente Hospital T Moreno Valley College m ago Pes 9�, •O• �o� Trautwein RIVERSIDE T Magnolia & Elizabeth 0®® 1 EI Kitching A v Indian Moreno Valley College Y MORENO VALLEY Mission Grove at Social Security T Mission Grove @ Social Security 20 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility ® Alternate routing when school is in session 21 Galleria at Tyler to Country Village Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Also serving: Glen Avon Library and Van Buren. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Marlay a �T Philadelphia T Mulberry & Marlay .� 2 Cherry Omnitrans 82 \OI FONTANA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Country Village 5 T JURUPA San Sevaine VALLEY MIRA LOMA Y o := o� T Country Village 49 Ben Nevis Mission Blvd. Jurupa Valley HS Jurupa Melba Dunlap Community Center & Library RIVERSIDE COUNTY ■ at GLEN AVON T Limonite 4 Glen Avon Library T Etiwanda & Limonite Ell Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information 29 Arlington ■ T Arlington & Van Buren ®® nay«lu METROLINK The Pedley Station PEDLEY 0 v 3s 3N a •2 RIVERSIDE Walmart T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 lurupa uaney Spectrum T� K-Mart 1* California &Van Buren ®® v g • Magnolia California ■ 1 Galleria at Tyler 22 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Riverside Downtown Terminal Mission Inn 100 1 9 Also serving: Lake Elsinore, Mead Valley, Woodcrest, & Kmart. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. O University iverside Downtown 1 10 Terminal 12 13 14 15 16 22 29 49 204 208 210 212 216 Omnitrans215 SunLine220 Alessandro +. s. d G �P7 Van Buren MLK o HS Mission Grove Plaza Social Security Office 7 T anposa Markham Citrus Hill H.S. WOODCREST T Outlet Center 0 8 El Lake Elsinore Outlet Center 206 Riverside 6 8 T Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information RIVERSIDE T Mission Grove at Social Security 20 T Trautwein & Van Buren Oleander T Cajalco Rd & Clark St. T MEAD VALLEY Nichols LAKE 15 ELSINORE Central 74 Meadowbrook 2 5 r� r 74 Cajalco Rider St San PERRIS Jacinto Perris Station 4 Ellis Transit Center Nd kr?" 4th 3 • T Perris Station Transit Center ®® MEI 19 208 30 74 23 Temecula - Murrieta - Wildomar Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Also serving: Inland Valley Reg. Medical Center, Rancho Springs Medical Center, Chaparral High School, County Center Drive. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Inland Valley Regional O Med Ctr T 9 a �ca, O. WILDOMARpr4» Murrieta vp• Valley N7k HS �n " �7' 6 s 00,1 •. Murrieta � Senior Ctr t. &City 9o0 Hall T Walmart 202 206 P� T Inland Valley Hospital 0® 411 Nutmeg MURRIETA Clinton Keith Skyview LI> y Ridge Amanda Apts� (boos 5 Rancho Springs Medical Center Walmart al Equity Dr & Ynez Rd ®m® 11161 79 T County Center Drive ® 24 61 61 79 T Hancock &Los Alamos 61 c• .y/r6 Vista ©o Murrieta H.S. \$s Los Alamos T Los Alamos&Whitewood Legend l Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility ® Alternate Routing 208 �c Palm Plaza 15 a 14,,. d -of 9p,• s �9% O, Nicolas Chaparral HS Library Curt ociapServices Promenade o Mall A G 3 a O, N 79 Winchester TEMECULA 2 24 Temecula to Pechanga Resort to Temecula Walmart Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to diange. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. OPERATED BY TROLLEY. Also serving: County Center Drive, Temecula Schools, Temecula Stage Stop & Old Town. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Koh tea. Business Qy "� 15 \loce•s7 • �Palm Plaza T County Center Drive ® 24 El 61 79 T Temecula Stage Stop 24 79 Temecula • Stage Stop 4 Old Town 6th 1st 3 T urt f F e,• 7V¢e Library `oJbc� Chaparral HS rn 6 Co Social Services T Equity Dr &Ynez Rd ®® Temecula Plaza Solana Promenade Mall Costa Temecula ES TEMECULA a�<c10 Mai°• Margarita 53 MS TownCtc Target Rancho California Post office A rp 79 Rancho Vista Temecula Library Ynez4v Palomar Village 6 Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information WM Alternate Routing a Temecula Va11epg . pasha Rri. Campanula d c NB Only Temecula Pkwy 90, 2 1 0 o� Temecula Walmart \a Vail Ranch RedHawkPkwy Peppercorn Pechanga Resort 0 Great Oaks HS 27 Galleria at Tyler to Hemet Valley Mall and Florida & Lincoln Information (enter (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O ' T Sun City- Stater/Vons ® 40 61 m Also serving: Riverside National Cemetery, Perris High, &Valle Vista. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 208 T Galleria at Tyler ®E1 Galleria at Tyler RIVERSIDE van Buren WOODCREST Wood Rd MLK High T Perris Station Transit Center El ®m 19 208 sdn City = MENIFEE N V «Bradley Sherman v o SUN ROMOLAND lJV 4 " 30 74 T 5 CITY Leon Paloma Hemet Valley Mall 3 Perris Station Transit Center (St. NB Kirby 2s )) T 2NJ Gilmore 0 t 7 API 6T R'verside National m Cem Perris z Redlands T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® ®® Perris H.S. 74 79 HEMET Lyon Q Lyon �amo�af„-1:06 Val otiLincoln E Grant VALLE VISTA 91 8 Washington Trautwein a, o4 Tyler MarchlPA • 9 T Trautwein & Van Buren ®® PERRIS 42 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information m Alternate Routing when school is in session ® Long-term Detour Routing 29 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Hamner & Limonite Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O , Also serving: Belltown, Downtown Rubidoux, Rubidoux Academy, De Anza Plaza, Vons Shopping Center. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Hamner 11 65th & Pat's Ranch T Limonite & Archer Pats Ranch Rd Etiwanda Archer vauguteo krona Palley c Spectrum 2 DeAnzaPlaza JURUPA VALLEY Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing RIVERSIDE Riverside Downtown Terminal 6 Market r Hamner & Limonite T Etiwanda & Limonite El Collins Pedley EASTVALE MIRA LOMA METROLINK The Pedley Station PEDLEY Camino Real a T Riverside Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®®m ® 16 ® 29 49 Rubidoux Academy RUBIDOUX T Mission & Rubidoux Omnitrans 215 SunLine 220 Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 0 Weston San Jacinto Perris - Weston & Strohm to Walmart Information Center {951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Also serving: Perris High School, Civic Center, Post Office, Library. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Ramona Expressway tiv T Perris Station Transit Center ®® 19 30 74 208 n Placentia O Walmart Nuevo Rd. Stater Bros. Center Perris Senior Center • . San Jacinto Perris Station Transit Center 4th 2 • EB 7th 11 th 4 Civic Center >WB wB Library EB/WB 6 T Valley Plaza Hospital Perris HS 19 30 Orange Valley Plaza Doctors Hospital Mildred WB< San Jacinto II ,.. Pry, o� V El- B/WB 5T EB EB 4th 11th PERRI, Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility 3 Ellis • • Post : Office T 4th & Wilkerson m 30 31 Beaumont/Banning to San Jacinto & Hemet Valley Mall Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O, N Also serving:Walmart, Kmart, Riverside County Administration Complex, Mt. San Jacinto Community College. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. BEAUMONT/ BANNING Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information T Hemet Valley Mall EIBIER1 11111 Im 79 I®I® Hemet pruValley .• /tfra/P AvP 'm Mall' Be%,yVe i 1 R c Deyo4shire4 h' «larhamgv P P c�aAm Q a� Vd.A6 2 ryAve S' City Hall T 3 79 Lamb Canyon 4 a; pamaaa opY a 9 SAN JACINTO 6 d � O T Walmart Pass Transit islSC . zdr QC a� T � Kmar • ZQ F� SU?ldkPSB4pa o Sun v Lakes Village T Sun Lakes Blvd. ®® T Pass Transit T Mt. San Jacinto College ®I®Im®® T fspianadPgYe County Complex o c °11 4 Wh/ 104oe e Mt. San Jacinto Comm College T Buena Vista & Devonshire HEMET T5 32 Hemet Valley Mall to Mount San Jacinto College Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Hemet Hospital. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. "/a4dB�`' T San Jacinto & Esplanade o Y W O E Devonshire Hemet Valley Mall/Sears Florida Ave. Hemet Valley •• Center • T Hemet Valley Mall 74 79 212 217 HEMET Stetson OP Sat ecrest ii an Jacinto HS Monte Vista MS a 7th St. Menlo Acacia Acacia MS Mayberry • Thornton T Mt. San Jacinto College Mt. San Jacinto Comm College Ramona Expressway Chamber of City Commerce H°II Main St. Main St. North Esplanade Stater Brothers Super Walmart S JAC Valley Wide Teen Center Devonshire ett Mountain MS 7th St. 5 Evans Commonwealth • '.1 N NTO T San Jacinto & Latham ®® Florida Ave. Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility ® Alternate Routing 33 Hemet - Sanderson to East Hemet Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O + Florida & Stanford 27 33 Also serving: Hemet Valley Mall, Hemet mobile home parks. No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Florida & San Jacinto ®®® T San Jacinto & Oakland ®® Stanford St Dartmouth St S Columbia St San Jacinto St it _ T San Jacinto St a a a N Buena Vista St» N State St N Lyon Ave a Kirby S Sanderson Ave T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® 74 79 ®® Hemet Valley Mall N Gilmore St Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information 0 Medical Facility a) 3 SGilbert St tHHEMET og LL S Lyon Ave 0 L - 1 a Sanderson Ave a o S Cawston Ave a Hemet HS 0 0 EAST HEMET S State St S Lyon Ave 35 Beaumont/Banning to Moreno Valley Mall Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Walmart, Kmart, City Hall, Riverside County Regional Medical Center. No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. e Moreno Valley Mall BEAUMONT/ BA114rhIING %,a 9s T Sun Lakes Blvd. MEI PassTransit Super Target Stoneridge A Shopping Center c Pry. 9f �q d'ro `" .o"° T Moreno Valley Mall im SunLine 220 Auto Mall Super Walmart CRMC MORENO VALLEY Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility �1,a �QS SJo\a Sun Lakes Village 40 Lake Elsinore to Sun City Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. i O Also serving: Lake Elsinore, Quail Valley, Canyon Lake, Sun City. No service on Weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T SunCity- StaterNons m 40 61 m City Han StaterNons Evans Center r L_., Senior Center o SUN CITY Quail Valley Fire Station E, z Goetz Rd QUAIL VALLEY Sun City Plaza «Berea Railroad Canyon Rd MENIFEE Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information CANYON Main LAKE Gate City Hall \S sy°o LAKE ELSINORE rd a aQe Walmart of Albertson 41 Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley College and RCRMC Information Center (951) 565-soot Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 0 O Also serving: Rancho Verde High School, RE MoVal, Riverside County Regional Medical Center. No service on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. MEAD VALLEY Oakwood Rider St 1 T Mead Valley Community Center T Cajalco Rd & Clark St. 111 41 �o Q. Cajalco Rd T RCRMC ®m 20 MORENO VALLEY T Moreno Valley College m 18 19 20 T Perris & Ramona Expy Ross/Lowe's/ Starcrest R ExPy a p Val Verde HST .• Starcrestl, 2 T Morgan St • Ross • T Ross/Lowe's/Starcrest 19 41 RCRMC 1FK Dr Gentian Ave T+ 7 z 6 Cactus Vista Del Lago H.S. Iris Ave T 3 Krameria ▪ College r 5 Moreno • Valley Rancho Lasselle & Verde Via De Anza H.S. Via De Anza Rider St 4 PERRIS Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility 42 San Jacinto - Hemet Information (enter (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 'O Also serving: San Jacinto, Soboba Springs MHE, Caravana ML, San Jacinto TP, Tradewinds ML, Grandview MHP, Las Casitas MHP, El Rancho MHE, Valley Hi MHP. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information Ramona Expy SAN �° Pr San Jacinto J A C I N T u CommunityCenter �r 2E J¢ 2W o°a fie° (&S.' 9DP 1 4 • • sa 04. c sc; Soboba Rd s Soboba Casino 6 • ©Soboba Springs Mobile Home Estates Mobile Home Parks T San Jacinto & Esplanade 9P�® st 42 74 T ¢,OAS co 3NEKEED �Super a mart 6PQ,QO4Oe'oa gc e, HEMET Hemet Valley Mall t T T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® 74 79 42 49 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Country Village Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Riverside, Rubidoux. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Rivers'deDowntown Terminal 0 to ®®0 ® 16 I® 29 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 RUBIDOUX o `VaRPYway 0 ac ac T Mulberry & Marlay Omnitrans Count yVillage Rd Country. Cabernet d Village i m h N COUNTRY VILLAGE a oPYerre �N 216 Sunline 220 0o Eddie �Sy Smith Senior Center Mama */ AquadicPark bd Camino Real Patriot H.S. PedleyRo, 4ow Rubidoux Academy RIVERSIDE Riverside Downtown Terminal T Mission & Rubidoux Felspar GLEN AVON T Country Village El Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information 49 50 Jury Trolley Information center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Jury Remote Parking to 12th & Main, Riverside County Courthouse. Runs Monday — Thursday Only. No service on the following holidays and court closure days: New Year's Day, MLK Day, Lincoln's Birthday, Washington's Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Market & 14th 0®® Tequesquite Eden Lutheran Church Parking Lot United Methodist Church 11 th St. 14th Street Riverside O Community Hospital Rice Calvary Presbyterian Church Parking Lot (nearest stop 14th & Magnolia) Terracina Ramona City Hall 10th St. 12th St. Riverside County Court House County Administrative Hall of Center Justice T 14th & Magnolia 0®® 50 Physical Therapy & Sports Clinic Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information O Medical Facility 0 Stop RIVERSIDE RCC T Magnolia&Terracina 0®® 50 51 Crest Cruiser UCR - Canyon Crest Towne Centre Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Route operates on UCR academic days only. No service from June 17 - September 20. Z University Village & Village Towers Apts 16 51 T Chicago & University 0® ®® T Chicago & Central ®® Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information Q Stop '. Village Towers Apartments T Iowa&Blaine Ein University Village SunLine 220 T Canyon Crest & MLK (Lot 30) ® 208 210 Ell 16 10 Lot 4 Crest Dr. T Canyon Crest & Central Ell 16 Canyon Crest Towne Centre 54 Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O Commerce St. Metrolink Parking Lot to County Administrative Center EVERYONE RIDES FREE No service on county holidays: New Year's Day, MLK Day, Lincoln's Birthday, Washington's Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. RIVERSIDE T County Administration Bldg ®® 54 20 210 Riverside County Administrative Center 7gthst SunLine 220 71 rt the t METROLINK Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station yQn J o¢' tLFSTBLuN J Commerce St Metrolink Parking Lot v �a o 1/4 ,P a'° 7r thst 4e Legend I Map not to scale Qs Stop 0 Transfer to other RTA Routes 55 Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetosa cambios. O Promenda Mall - Harveston EVERYONE RIDES Also serving: Chaparral High School, Ysabel Barnett Elementary School, Abbott, Promenade Mall, Harveston and County Center Drive. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. NO SERVICE FROM JUNE 17, 2013 - AUGUST 11, 2013 lO'FP . TEMECULA`%�o, O' T Equity Dr &Ynez Rd ®m® HEI 79 61 County Center 23 24 61 79 55 Pr ysabel 'k Barnett ai°v 0 E.S. * a z a rRVESTONf Equity Dr > (0�° t ¢S\e "Township Rd ,v m m Chaparral H.S. The Promenade ` at Temecula �P<t boa Palm Plaza Shopping Center Extended Stay America Ovet�apd'O Legend I Map not to scale QQ Stop 0 Transfer to other RTA Routes Best Abbott Western 1 ` d� Rustic Glen Dr �a c• �c as T Promenade Mall at P.F. Chang's ® 79 202 206 208 Overland Dr M towt c p �a 61 Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O un City - Menifee - Murrieta - Temecula Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Also serving: Sun City Center, Loma Linda Medical Building. No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Chambers Ave McCall SUN — Blvd CITY a T Cherry Hills & Bradley 40 61 74 208 7 6 T City Hall Newport Rd Senior Countryside La Piedra Center Marketplace 0 • MSJC Menifee s T MSJC Menifee 0 61 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility Ado 7MURRIETA �d�J, 4 a ,2 Q SCott Rd Keller» = Linnel 2 'Oo DomenigoniPkwy MENIFEE Loma Linda BdxrPO University E Medical Center 3 Clinton Keith r v,47- S 4 Rancho N z` Medical Center T Equity Dr&YnezRd T Hancock & Los Alamos El 61 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Murrieta Hot Springs Rd • is �P TEMECULA 9d +a d a 1' ,5 County nterp, '1 T Promenade County Map Services a�ld T County Center ®m® 79 61 74 San Jacinto - Hemet - Sun City - Perris Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Mt. San Jacinto College 7 ca ado Also serving: Hemet Valley Mall. No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Super Walmart T s San Jacinto 3 State o SAN. JACINTO 0 T T Mt. San Jacinto College ®® 74 ®® 4® estbound only — L Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility T 4th & Wilkerson 30 74 PERRIS T Wilkerson 451 C Perris St 2 scl T San Jacinto & Esplanade ®mm HEMET Lyon I=_ Eastbound only Gilmore 6 T hod Kirby T Hemet Valley Mall 42 74 79 Hemet Valley Mall Sanderson ,o Super Walmart a T T Sanderson & Thornton 74 79 West Valley . High School Warren o 6 WINCHESTER • 5 Winchester 0 T Simpson & Winchester 74 79 MenifeeValley M E N i U L L Medical Center O Sun City Center, Chamber of Commerce, Library, Post Office 3 T • Sun City o SUN CITY T Perris Station Transit Center ®® CL Antelope» Bradley T MSJC, Menifee m 61 off. • Menifee 4 T Cherry Hills & Bradley El Mt. San Jacinto College/ Menifee Perris Station Transit Center 19 30 74 208 79 Hemet - Winchester -Temecula Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Hemet Valley Mall. No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Simpson & Winchester m 79 • Winchester&Simpson • Winchester & Pourroy/Whispering Heights WINCHESTER T Equity Dr &Ynez Rd ® 24 El 61 79 MURRIETA Ho 4/0o id T County Center Drive o/0gs ® 24 El 61 79 to01-1» Chaparral HS .?'r c County 3 Center Dr" T e `T a 3 4 79 Promenade Mall T 5 T 8 7 a T Sanderson & Thornton ®m 79 Super • Walmart Mustang Sim son 3 nton Magdas (oloradas Auld French Valley T �hia,Airport oc 9y c� Nicolas West Valley High School T 74 Devonshire Florida Hemet • ;.; Valley Mall HEMET T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®®m m 79 ®® FRENCH VALLEY Southwest 6 Justice Center Sheriff Station Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information T Winchester& Nicolas 79 TEMECULA T Promenade Mall at P.F. Chang's ® 79 202 206 208 T Temecula Stage Stop li TS 1 Rancho California' . r Temecula • Moreno Stage Stop 6th & Front fp rt 6th» c % 7 24 79 ;god Murrieta - Temecula - Oceanside Transit Center $3.00GEN. FARE EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Walmart 202 206 MURRIETA RIVERSIDE COUNTY Murrieta Hot springs T 5 Walmart TEMECULA T Promenade Mall at P ® 79 202 206 208 ® eS�e� 4 Promenade I Mall .F. Chang's iiabbugr©o rcaC e\00 Rancho California» SAN DIEGO COUNTY Town Center ��J`S�e� North SMission a tie (73 0. OCEANSIDE Oceanside Transit Center 76 2A o jaw 9� n Cntr 9P M T 3 3 to Park -And -Ride Lot 19 'Ddt, _ "Nessie Burger Lot" P% l T Town Center North 202 NCTD METROLINK T Oceanside Transit Center Coaster Gre hound Amtrak California Sprinter/Metrolink 76 FALLBROOK Legend I Maps not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information Q Stop Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O� Riverside - Montclair Transcenter $3.00 EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Riverside Downtown Terminal 0 10 El El ® 16 El i= 29 14 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 216 Sunline 220 Downtown Terminal T 2 M Country Village Park -And -Ride Mission Blvd o Fairmount r Park .� Park- Market St And - Ride «Iowa nyon Crest T UCR 0 16 El �3o v RIVERSIDE 204 210 Sunline 220 T Montclair Transcenter 204 Foothill Transit Omnitrans 65, 66, 67, 68, 80, 82 MONTCLAIR Central z N Miliken 5 Southbound ptevtsta Montdair Plaza 4 T 3 3 o L • METROLINK Montclair Transcenter ONTARIO Ontario Mills Mall IT Ontario Mills Mall Mulberry Stop NB at Country Village Rd & Country Club Dr. Omnitrans 61 Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information 0 Stop 206 Temecula - Murrieta - Lake Elsinore - Corona Metrolink $ 3.00GEN. FARE EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINH PASS x Hidden Valley Pkwy No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. CORONA T Corona Transit Center 206 216 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. LAKE ELSINORE T Outlet Center 0 8 El \S o� 206 `ec�sa\ MURRIETA Springs MuttietaMot Sp d� o� Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information T Lake Elsinore Outlet Center 2 Walmart T Walmart EN 202 206 Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. tip N1\n�he5tet �°' TEMECULA Promenade Mall . T 1 T Promenade Mall at P.F. Chang's ® 79 202 206 208 Ell 20 • Temecula - Murrieta - Sun City - Perris Moreno Valley - Downtown Terminal $3.00EAH: FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS Riverside Downtown Terminal • UCR Lot 30 8� 6 T 7 Riverside Downtown Terminal 15 16 22 29 49 204 208 210 212 216 Omn trans 215 SunLine 220 Blvd Riverside - "'"'" Downtown Metrolink Station MLK RIVtISIDI • Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station 0 16 208 210 SunLine 220 Amtrak 40 Perris Station Transit Center ®® 30 m EMI 19 208 5 Moreno Valley Mall San Jacinto Perris Station Transit Center 215 c Also serving: Riverside City Hall and County Administration Building. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 4th IN Moreno Valley Mall El 16 18 19 208 210 SunLine 220 PERRIS COB SB )) McCall r T Cherry Hills . • Cherry Hills & Bradley ® 40 61 m Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information cm Alternate Routing 208 "URRIET" • Los Alamos & Whitewood El 208 Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. T Promenade Mall at P.F. Chang's ® 79 202 206 208 Routing and timetables subject todrange. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. MORENO VALLEY O SUN CITY MENIFEE Los Alamos �p5 oS & Whitewood P�a�a s06�a Promenade Mall TEMECULA 7 Riverside DowntownTerminal SEE FAREGRID BELOW 2 1 0/226 to Palm Desert FOR ROUTE PRICING iO Also serving: Riverside City Hall, County Admin. Building. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Riverside - DowntownMetrolinkStation 0 16 208 210 EVI SunLine 220 Amtrak UCR T Fir&Nason 210 SunLine 220 ZONE CABAZON - RIVERSIDE Beaumont City Hall 6 Casino Morongo 7 g Ramsey' & Morongo T Riverside Downtown Terminal 15 16 22 204 208 210 29 49 212 216 Omnitrans215 SunLine 220 T Moreno Valley Mall 11 16 18 19 35 208 210 SunLine 220 Route 210/220 Stops WB STOP • Morongo Ave N Sunset Ave INNIN G Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. ! EB STOP ZONE 2 PALM DESERT - THOUSAND PALMS Monterrey & Dinah Shore 9 16 Town Cente & Hahn Way Hemet - San Jacinto - Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station - Downtown Terminal $3.00 MT: WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O, N Also serving: Riverside City Hall and Riverside County Administration Building, MSJC. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Riverside Downtown Terminal mi RIVERSIDE ��r NIFIROLINK • Riverside - ' Downtown Metrolink Station T Perris Station Transit Center 19 208 ®® 30 74 • 3 Perris Station Transit Center T Rivers•de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®®m ® 16 El UCR Lot • 30 29 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 216 SunLine 220 T Riverside - DowntownMetrolinkStation 0 16 208 210 EiEl SunLine 220 Amtrak ® MORENO VALLEY PERRIS ROUTE MAY BE DEVIATED DUE TO TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information • Stop 74 Hemet Transit Depot T Mt. San Jacinto College ®® 74 ®® SAN JACINTO T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® ®® 74 79 42 Hemet o •J(alley 'ja • ; ' Mall 9Oe .!_\q� �e ©`° . T � i`./ ~N 4/4;.`: t HEMET Mt San Jacinto College • d dfb d� Fb d �d P • t Heim Ave Layover WB ends; OEB starts T Meats Ave : @ Chestnut © Riverside Downtown Terminal to Village at Orange $ 3.00GEN. FARE EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS 0 = Stop O @ Katella T Village at Orange OCTA 24, 42, 46, 50 0`/RANGE Village at Orange Also serving: Riverside, The Galleria at Tyler, Corona, and Village at Orange, Orange County. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horanos son sujetos a cambios. West Portion of 216 Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. Routing and timetables subject to change. T Corona Transit Center d Corona Cruiser Blue, Red 1/ MEiROLINK Corona s Transit Center CORON i Continued below> East Portion of 216 2< T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 < Continued above 14 Ma9.00 CORONA T Rivers•de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®® ® 16 El MEI 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 29 14 49 216 SunLine 220 RIV Gallena at Tyler `' Market 91 T \�N ett`I Riverside Downtown Terminal 5 5 ?. 2 Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information O Park -And -Ride San Jacinto - Hemet - Temecula - Escondido GEN. FARE $�oOO EACH WAY Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. k O Also serving: MSJC. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. W Mt. San Jacinto College T Mt. San Jacinto College ®®m®® T Hemet Valley Mall Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Stop ® Alternate Routing AM Northbound/PM South hound MURRIETA County Center Drive quity 2 . J T h • 3 T Equity Dr&YnezRd ® 24 ri MEI 79 61 79 m®®® ®® 74 79 42 0 0 Stetso Domenigoni Pkwy N v c Hemet . Valley Mall Devonshire T 4 orida s Esplanade Laahhan} INSET MAP ARE/ HEMET INSET MAP Devonshire Hemet Valley Mall 0 E Florida Ave Latham Hemet Transit Depot 0 v x T Promenade Mall at P.F. Chang's ® 79 202 206 208 Promenade Mall �tQkwy .Mo<ot Mar9ar77ta ESCOND1u, 0 t TEMECULA ROUTE MAY BE DEVIATED DUE TO TRAFFIC CONDITIONS T Escondido Transit Center Enani NCTD MTS 810 Gre hound Escondido Cty Hall Escondido Transit Center OCTA 794/ 794A La Sierra Metrolink or Canyon Community Church - South Coast Metro $6.00 WAY Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. / NO La Sierra Metrolink Station 1 T Route operated by &TA. Also serving: Canyon Community Church Park and Ride and Hutton Centre. Runs Weekdays only. No service on: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 91 RIVERSIDE T La Sierra Metrolink Station o� Main 91 OCTA 794 2 PR Canyon Community Church Park and Ride 241 ANAHEIM ORANGE 55 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® 794A connection from Corona PR Park -And -Ride Hutton Centre MANTA 4NA ap South Coast Plaza Area OCTA 51, 55, 57, 76, 86, 145,172,173, 211, 216, 464,794 T v 5 3 4 IRVI E COSTA MESA South Coast Metro APPENDIX 6: SERVICE STANDARDS AND WARRANTS SERVICE STANDARDS WARRANTS GUIDELINES Adopted January 2009 Revised June 2012 I. Purpose Service standards are resourceful for the planning and operation of a transit agency as it provides the foundation for route design and resource management. The Riverside Transit Agency (Agency) recognizes the importance of evaluating its services and has conducted an extensive study on how its own service standards will be used through the use of reports and studies conducted by leading transportation research programs and other transit agencies. One of the most prominent transportation research bodies is the Transit Research Board (TRB). The TRB is a leader of transportation research and innovation. It is one of six major divisions of the National Research Council which is a private, nonprofit institution that is the principal operating agency of the National Academies in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. Among the many research programs that TRB administers are those funded by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) such as the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP). FTA provides TCRP approximately $8 million annually to study operating problems and address them with approaches to help meet the demands placed on public transit systems. The results of this program have produced numerous studies and findings that are highly regarded and used in the transit industry, and are incorporated into the Agency's Service Standards and Warrants Guidelines. In June 2007, the Board accepted the Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) as a guiding document for service enhancements over the course of the next five to ten years. Among the strategies and recommendations included in the COA's Service Improvement Plan are "Service Standards" (Section 4.5). The service standards provided in the COA outline the recommended minimum levels of providing public transit with respect to design characteristics such as route structure, coverage, span of service, and on -time performance. Since the acceptance of the COA, service has been measured against the standards and was formerly adopted by the Agency's Board of Directors in January 2009. The service standards in the COA are based primarily on peer comparisons and stakeholder consultation along with the experiences of professional staff. However, while most standards are applicable others needed to be modified to reflect the demographics and characteristics of western Riverside County. As the Agency operates transit services within the second largest service area in the nation, it is necessary to have standards and warrants that reflect western Riverside County's demographic and geographic diversity, namely the differences in service levels for Regional, Local, Rural, Express, and Trolley or Special service types which are unique to the region. Service standards are also used to evaluate numerous requests and proposals for service modifications that are received from a variety of sources including customers, employees, transit professionals, and technical resources. With standards in place, a 1 criterion is used to measure how and when service modifications will take effect. New service warrants are also necessary for the design and implementation of new routes because it provides a rationale by which new services can be justified. Service standards and warrants, sometimes known as service design standards and guidelines at other transit agencies, is different and independent of the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) Productivity Improvement Program (PIP). While PIP is an effective tool in the measurement of performance, its primary purpose is to determine financial viability of service. There are eight measures in the PIP, but there are two performance indicators that are more closely monitored, which are Farebox Recovery and Passengers per Revenue Hour. These are the primary measurements for determining service performance based on the PIP standards. Farebox recovery is the only mandatory target. For the other targets, the Agency must meet or exceed four of the remaining seven to continue receiving Transportation Development Act (TDA) funding as an RCTC requirement. The mandatory target, farebox recovery, is mandated by the State of California and requires that a transit agency maintain a minimum threshold to continue receipt of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds. The farebox recovery ratio is a blended percentage based on a requirement for urbanized transit service to maintain a farebox recovery of 20 percent and rural transit service to maintain a farebox recovery of 10 percent. Each PIP target is updated annually with the Agency's Short Range Transit Plan. In addition to these factors, service change recommendations are based on analysis inclusive of public comments, ridership data, and operational characteristics. Productivity Improvement Program 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio Mandatory 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour 2. Subsidy Per Passenger 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile 4. Subsidy Per Hour 5. Subsidy Per Mile 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile Meet 4 out of 7 2 II. Service Standards There are several factors that are typically considered when objectively measuring service performance. These factors in addition to the PIP help in the determination of whether service is effective at meeting the common needs of the community. A. Population Density The level of service is determined by the number of people to serve in a particular area. Population density can be measured in miles, by zip code, census tract, neighborhoods, or any number of logical factors. Typically density is measured in the number of people per square mile since FTA recognizes coverage based on distance from service in miles. Density is determined in two fundamental ways - number of people housed per square mile or the number of employees per square mile. Agency staff works with city, county, and regional planners to estimate current and future density to properly plan for future public transportation access. A typical standard of route design is such that 85% of all residences, places of work, secondary and post secondary schools, shopping centers, and public facilities in the Agency's urban transit service area are within a walking distance of 1,500 ft. of a bus stop during the daytime Monday through Saturday. Area %of Fixed Route Distance Urban Non -Urban 85% 100% 1, 500-ft Undefined Based on United States Census Bureau (US Census) 2010 data, western Riverside County is comprised of a highly diverse transit market. However, less than two percent of the 1.7 million service area population comprises the ridership of the Agency. Further, 94.7% percent of the population in RTA's service area lives within an Urbanized Area, or "UZA." A large UZA consists of a population over 200,000 and in the Agency's service area, the greater Riverside and Temecula-Murrieta areas both qualify. All small UZA's consist of a population between 50,000 and 200,000. The Hemet/San Jacinto area qualifies as a small UZA. When evaluating the density of an area the demand for service is also considered. Some areas have significant density but have little service demand. Automobile centric and higher income communities are but a few examples of areas that may have sufficient density with little demand for public transit. 3 B. Route Classifications Route classifications help define the type of service to operate based on the density of the area in which the service is routed. The Agency's fixed route services can be classified into five categories — Regional, Local, Rural, Express, and Trolley or Special. Complementary to the fixed route service is paratransit service, also known as Dial -A -Ride (DAR). • A Regional route service is the backbone of the network as it operates between metropolitan areas on primary corridors and may utilize the freeway system to travel between communities. It is not uncommon for regional service to travel through non -urban areas to link two urban areas. Within a metropolitan area, stops are spaced at urban intervals (based on the '/4 mile walking distance of determining stop locations under section "D. Bus Stop Spacing"), in which these routes serve a secondary purpose of transporting passengers locally. • Local routes supplement Regional routes by circulating through various neighborhoods and serving secondary corridors. A Local route also serves as feeder routes to Regional and Express routes and transports customers within a community on shorter trips. Bus stop spacing is at urban service intervals. • An exclusive Rural route serves as lifeline service that feeds regional service. Given the growth of western Riverside County, rural route service is primarily limited to portions of Regional route service and areas between cities. • Express routes provide limited stop service designed to transport commuters to and from employment sites and provide connections to service outside western Riverside County. Labeled as CommuterLink, these buses use the freeway system to provide faster service. • Trolley routes or Special service are designed to meet the needs of a specific market or community and often are designed as a circulator to serve a targeted group with common travel patterns. • DAR paratransit service complements fixed route service for customers who are physically challenged and are unable to navigate their way to a bus stop. DAR service is offered curb to curb within three-quarters of a mile of fixed route service, excluding express routes. DAR service coincides with the hours of fixed route service. Passengers eligible for the service are seniors and those qualified under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. 4 When used effectively route classifications provide the community with a balanced service structure. The following table highlights the classification of each of the Agency's fixed route services: Directly Operated Routes Contract Operated Routes 1 Regional 3 Local 10 Local 7 Local 11 Local 8 Local 12 Local 212 Local 13 Local 23 Local 14 Regional 24 Local 15 Local 30 Local 16 Local 311 Rural' 18 Local 32 Local 19 Regional 33 Local 20 Regional 35 Regional 212 Local 40 Local 22 Regional 413 Regional 27 Regional 42 Local 29 Regional 50 Trolley 413 Regional 51 Trolley 49 Regional 55 Trolley 54 Local 61 Regional 204 Express 74 Regional 206 Express 79 Regional 2083 Express 202 Express 216 Express 2083 Express 210 Express 212 Express 217 Express ,..... , r r .. ... 2 Effective September 9, 2012 with the September 2012 service change, Route split between Directly Operated and Contract Operated service based on ridership demand. 3 Route split between Directly Operated and Contract Operated service based on ridership demand. C. Span of Service The span of service, the hours of operation, refers to the start and end time of a route. Depending on the route structure (e.g. Regional, Local, Rural, Express, Trolley or Special), the span of service will vary depending on the demand in the community. In urbanized areas, bus service is expected to start earlier and end 5 later in the day; whereas, for Local and Rural routes, the demand for earlier and later service may not be present. The days of operation also contribute to when bus service will be provided. In the Agency's transit system, all fixed routes are proposed to operate weekdays from at least 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and, depending on ridership and land use patterns, can start as early as 4:00 a.m. and stay in service until 10:30 p.m. on weekdays under ideal financial times. Under the current economic conditions and resources, and to continue to provide customers with adequate service, the revenue service hours for the Agency are described below: Route Classification Weekday Start Range End Range Saturday Start Range End Range Sunday Start Range End Range Local - Direct Local - Contract Regional - Direct Regional - Contract Rural Express Trolley or Special BRT Dial -A -Ride 4:30 AM - 6:30 AM 5:30 AM - 7:30 AM 4:00 AM - 6:00 AM 5:00 AM - 7:00 AM 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM 8:00 PM - 10:00 PM 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM 8:30 PM - 10:30 PM 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM 5:30 AM - 7:30 AM 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM 5:00 AM - 7:00 AM 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM 7:30 PM - 9:30 PM 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM 5:30 PM - 7:30 PM 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM Peak Hours Route 216 Only Route 216 Only Varies based on targeted market or community 4:00 AM 10:00 PM 5:00 AM 9:00 PM 5:00 AM 9:00 PM Based on hours of fixed -routes, excluding Express services I Express services main y operate on weekdays except Route 216 which operates on weekdays, Saturdays, and Sundays Ridership on weekdays accounts for the majority of boarding activities and is mainly attributed to riders who utilize public transit for employment and educational purposes. On weekends, the hours of service is reduced as demand is lower resulting from most people having a traditional weekday work and school schedule. Express routes mainly operate weekdays during peak hours in the morning and evening to accommodate commuters. The hours of operation are adjusted based on peak direction commute patterns to meet commuter trains and regional employment and education centers start and end times. Ridership can necessitate modifications to the peak hours in order to accommodate additional service demand, such as seasonal weekday and weekend trips or overflow capacities. Trolley or Special routes operate based on the customer market base, whether it is aimed at transporting commuters or students and its days of operation may also vary depending on whether the demand for service is seasonal. DAR paratransit service coincides with the hours of fixed route service. D. Bus Stop Spacing Route coverage refers to the spacing distance between adjoining routes. This criterion is used to guide spacing between bus stops to maximize patron 6 accessibility to transit service within the resources available. Depending on the population density, bus stop spacing in the Agency's urbanized areas usually averages about 1,500 ft. (.28 miles) to 2,500 ft. (.47 miles). As service approaches more suburban and rural areas, bus stop spacing may be limited to locations with accessible curb and gutters and sidewalks suitable for ADA compliance. For Express routes that travel longer distances, the number of bus stops will be limited and are located in cities and communities that will attract the greatest number of commuters traveling in the same direction. Density Characteristics Bus Stop Spacing Very High: Over 5,000 persons per sq. mile (e.g., activity centers such as hospitals, colleges, and universities) Density = >15 units/acre Every 1/8 mile to % mile High: 4,000 to 5,000 persons per sq. mile (e.g., apartments, senior housing, offices, and commercial centers) Density = 8-15 units/acre Every % mile Medium: 2,000 to 4,000 persons per sq. mile Density = 5-7 units/acre Every % mile to mile Low or Rural: Less than 2,000 persons per sq. mile Density = 1-4 units/acre Every % mile to 1 mile or more if outside development area Bus stop spacing has an impact on average speed of service. The more stops a bus makes along a route, the lower the average speed of travel. E. On -Time Performance On -time performance, also known as schedule adherence reporting, is the deviation of actual arrival and departure time from the timetable or schedule. On - time performance standards vary in the industry depending on the size of the transit operator, generally the larger the size of operations the more stringent the standard (TCRP, 1995). Other factors such as density and route distances are also considered in setting an on -time standard. The Agency is considered a medium size operator and requires that no bus shall leave a time point early, and should arrive at a time point no later than 6 minutes after the scheduled arrival time. This 6 minute window is appropriate for the Agency's service area due to the average distance traveled by each route and the combined rural and urban areas. Transit agencies typically set a standard in percentages of on -time arrivals that they desire to achieve as a measure of good service quality. Among medium size transit systems, the typical desired level of system -wide on -time performance is between 80 to 95 percent. 7 One theory in setting standards is to set targets. A desired standard may not be achievable within the first year or so given the starting point of the current conditions. An example is if on -time performance is 62 percent, achieving a standard of 90 percent may be difficult within 12 months of operations without significant investment of resources. Setting a target below the standard, such as 80 percent, would act as a way to benchmark service improvements over the course of a 12 month period. To make gains towards improving on -time performance, agencies establish targets that demonstrate continuous improvements as they work toward standards. On -Time Performance Target On -Time 0 to 6 minutes Standard 90% Tar. et 85% With the use of ITS software, on -time performance is collected daily and measured monthly for all directly operated routes. Contracted service on -time performance is measured by supervisor surveys randomly completed each week. The average number of observations is 28.5 per day. Given the two different ways of collecting on -time performance data and blending the two types of operations, a standard of 85 percent or above is considered achievable. Using the theory of setting targets to reach a goal, the standard of 90 percent could be set with a first year target of achieving over 85 percent schedule adherence. Should the on -time performance of a specific route fall below the target of 85%, a schedule adherence analysis will be conducted to improve the running time. F. Headways Headway, also known as frequency, is the maximum interval between each scheduled fixed route bus (i.e. bus travels every 30 minutes). Headways are essential to the quality of service. Studies such as the COA have found that higher frequency headways correlate to higher ridership. However, this conventional theory is true if demand is supported by high density. Within the system, current headways range from every 20 minutes to every 120 minutes, depending on the density and demand for service. As services are routed away from urbanized areas, maximum intervals are higher to match ridership demand. Clock -face schedules are an attribute of consistent headways and are intervals of 20 minute increments for the purpose of this analysis. The COA study recommended that headways on most routes in urban areas be at intervals of at least 15 minutes. Based on financial and resource constraints, staff finds a closer match for headways to be at intervals of 20/40/60 minutes for Local route service. This means that all route schedules would operate at 20, 40, or 60 8 minutes. Regional service headways currently expand to every 100 minutes. Clock -face schedules can be a powerful marketing tool as the customer can depend on service coming at specific time intervals. Effort is given to timing transfers based on headway intervals. Route Class Freq in 20 min increments Target Local - Direct Local - Contract Regional Rural Express Trolley/Special BRT Dial -A -Ride 40/60 40/60 20/40/60 60-120 Varies Varies 10-15 N/A 40-70 60-90 20-100 60-120 Varies Varies N/A N/A G. Transfer Wait Time Transfer wait time is the time a customer has to wait for another bus route to arrive at a transfer point. The COA proposed that at timed transfer points, buses should be scheduled so that the wait time is not longer than 5 minutes for arriving buses or Metrolink trains. However, to more closely match the geographic and demographic demands of the system, timed transfers can vary depending on the distance and frequency of a route. In more urbanized areas such as downtown Riverside, transfer wait times will not be longer than approximately 20 minutes. However, in smaller urbanized and even in rural areas, the transfer wait time can reach 30 to 45 minutes depending on the frequencies of the routes in the area. For a Regional route, the Agency expects that transfer wait times should not exceed 20 minutes. For Local and Rural routes, transfer wait times should not exceed 30 to 45 minutes. For an Express route, which is usually timed to train transfers, transfer wait time should not exceed 20 to 30 minutes. H. Load Factor The maximum vehicle loadings refer to the maximum number of passengers per bus, including standees. Depending on the bus, the maximum number of passengers should not exceed 150% of the seating capacity or the legal weight limit of the bus. Load factors are based on the type of vehicle and service route classification type. The Agency's fixed route fleet consists of seven types of vehicles each 9 having varying seating and standee limitations. The only service which should not exceed seated capacity is DAR vehicles. Bus Size/Route Max. Seated Classification Capacity Max. Standees 40-ft. (NABI) 32-ft. (Aero Elite) 30-ft. (Thomas) 29-ft. (Type VII) 27-ft. (E-Lo) 27-ft. (Trolley) 24-ft. (Type II) III. Distribution of Transit Amenities 40 28 27 24 21 26/27 12 29 0 18 7 4 12/19 5 Transit amenities such as shelters, benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, and illuminated lighting devices will be distributed equitably throughout the service area based on boarding levels, proximity to major landmarks such as commercial or employment centers, population need (i.e. senior communities), and geographic location. IV. Productivity vs. Coverage Target To help improve effectiveness and efficiency it is prudent to set a target for the productivity level of service to operate. In order to meet productivity requirements while continuing to provide coverage to areas that would not be serviced if performance were the only factor, peer agencies have adopted standards requiring 60 to 80 percent of their fixed route service to perform up to productivity factors and 20 to 40 percent of fixed route service operated as coverage routes to meet the standards. Currently overall Agency service is about 50/50 (productive/coverage). The service that exceeds performance standards enables the Agency to provide more effective and efficient operations in areas of need that do not meet performance standards. Given the Agency's diverse service area, there are places that are being served based on the need to provide coverage. To maximize cost efficiency, a higher percentage of service should be designed to improve productivity and a smaller percentage of service designed based on coverage. With a greater percentage of service being productive, this allows the Agency the flexibility to sustain service based on coverage. The approved criterion for all new and existing service is 60 percent to be productive and 40 percent to be based on coverage. This establishes the benchmark for productive service to meet mandatory farebox recovery. However, it also allows for new service to be implemented following TDA guidelines for exemption of inclusion and exclusion based on performance standards within the year the service was implemented and the following two fiscal years. 10 This objective enables transit operators to maintain highly productive service and still meet the requirements of the Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI). It is the policy of the Agency to ensure compliance with Title VI so that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. V. New Service Warrants The service standards described herein are used as a measurement for the implementation and performance monitoring of existing and new services. PIP targets are updated annually and new service can be exempted from meeting the required criteria for up to two years. The performance of new service is evaluated during this initial period on whether or not it meets the Productivity or Coverage target. If a route fails to perform up to standards, it may be discontinued. New services should adhere to the Agency's Sustainable Funding Source Policy approved in September 2010. The enactment of the policy provides a framework which assures that funding sources, particularly temporary financial assistance or "seed" money are utilized only on service that has a significant potential to be productive and financially sustainable when funding expires or is depleted. This encourages the use of new or expanded service to demonstrate that it is warranted by meeting productivity standards over an established period of time. 11 APPENDIX C: PUBLIC HEARING POLICY FOR MAJOR SERVICE AND FARE CHANGES Riverside Transit Agency Public Hearing Policy for Major Service and Fare Changes (Approved 4/23/09) Revised 10/25/12 Background: The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) periodically makes major changes to routing, timetables, and fares. Because these changes can affect RTA customers, the Agency, and the Board of Directors (Board), RTA must follow Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Office of Civil Rights Title VI guidelines and requirements per Circular 4702.1 B effective October 1, 2012, and consider public input when deciding or approving major service and fare changes. Circular 4702.1 B necessitates revisions to the Public Hearing Policy to meet new Title VI guidelines and requirements for inclusion in the public hearing process. I. Policy For all proposed major changes, RTA will hold at least one public hearing, advertised for 30 days prior, in order to receive public comments including Limited English Proficient (LEP) populations within the RTA service area. In addition, RTA will conduct a service and fare equity analysis for Board and public consideration per the three categories below: 1. All proposed fare changes excluding ride free promotional events, and temporary fare reductions that are mitigating measures for other actions. 2. All promotional fare reductions remaining in effect after 6 months'. 3. Proposed service expansions and reductions including all routing and timetable changes remaining in effect after 12 months' that exceed 25 percent of their current configurations. II. Procedures 1. All public hearings shall be held during a regular meeting of the Board. 2. RTA shall advertise notice of public hearings in general circulation paper(s) 30 days prior to the public hearing, through Rider's Alerts, and on the RTA web site in accordance with Title VI guidelines and requirements outlined in Circular 4702.1 B. 3. In addition to the public hearing, RTA will follow the Agency's LEP policy, approved on April 23, 2009, to notify the public of the public comment period during which comments will be accepted by any standard method of communication such as email, phone, postal mail, at public meetings, at RTA headquarters, or at Board meetings. 4. RTA staff will provide a summary of the service and fare equity analysis to identify disparate impact including disproportionate burden affects related to minority and low income communities. 5. RTA staff will provide the Board with a summary of all input received from the public for consideration in evaluating proposed changes. 6. The Board will vote on the proposed changes including mitigations for identified disparate impacts, and RTA will publicize their decision to the public prior to implementing major changes. FTA's Circular 4702.1 B, "Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients" Chapter IV Sections 13 and 19. APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE FUNDING SOURCE POLICY Background: Policy: Riverside Transit Agency Sustainable Funding Source Policy (Approved 09/23/10) Temporary transit operating funding is financial assistance or grants offered for transit operational purposes on a one-time basis with a fixed dollar amount or for a limited time period with a fixed end date. This funding may come from federal, state, local or private sources. The purpose of these funds is to supplement a transit system's regular operating funds to expand service or to assist the transit system's operating budget during economic downturns or revenue shortage periods. When the temporary operating funding expires or is depleted, the ongoing operating costs for the service paid for by the temporary funding must either be absorbed by the transit system into the general operating budget or the service must be discontinued if the budget cannot sustain it. For the purpose of this policy, service shall be defined to include entire routes, segments of routes, service frequency, individual trips, hours of operation, days of operation and service area. RTA is committed to ensuring that the services offered are efficient, economically sustainable and meet the requirements of the RTA Service Standards and Warrants, and that the RTA operating budget and service plan are built around solid financial forecasts, cost analyses and objective performance standards. Therefore, the following shall define how temporary operating funding may be used: Temporary operating funding may be used for sustaining service only if all of the following criteria are met: • Funding is available from non-RTA sources to sustain the new service for a minimum of five years of operations unless clear terms are established for end date of service. • New or existing service funded by the temporary funding meets all of the qualifications of the current warrants adopted by RTA. • Existing service whose continued operation is to be funded by temporary funding must meet an acceptable level of productivity standards.* • New service funded by the temporary funding must be projected to meet productivity standards when the temporary funding expires or is depleted.* • When the temporary funding expires or is depleted, sufficient funding can be identified in future Agency budgets or from other sources to continue the new or existing service. Temporary operating funding shall not be used for any of the following purposes at any time: • Funding unproductive service to prevent discontinuation. • Re -instituting discontinued unproductive service. • Providing substitute funding for unproductive service. *Productivity standards shall be determined according to the current RTA Standard and Warrants, Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Performance Improvement Program (PIP) standards and State of California Transportation Development Act (TDA) farebox recovery requirements. SrmIffie TRANSIT AGENCY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 I �. P 1 { I ' \ _, _ m\\1tea-'5\ , . 44, -- .� it--:� '.(,, biz {, }-�� _ :4 1114 111401 ,/ _,,:, ,—, , srs ! __ Io haus It 1 1 . - -_ ,, -- -- �— 4_ SunLine Transit Agency SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW 2 1.1 Description of Service Area 2 Service Area Map 3 SunBus System Map 4 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 5 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service 5 Fixed Route Information 6 - 17 Paratransit Service 18 1.4 Current Fare Structure 19 1.5 Revenue Fleet 20 1.6 Existing Facilities and Planned Facilities 20 1.7 Taxi Administration 20 CHAPTER 2 EXISTING SERVICE and ROUTE PERFORMANCE 23 2.1 Fixed Route Service - Route by Route Analysis 23 2.2 Paratransit Service - System Performance 24 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 25 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts 25 2.5 Service Standards & Warrants 25 2.6 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next 2 Years 26 2.7 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 27 CHAPTER 3 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES and IMPLEMENTATION 34 3 1 Recent Service Changes 34 3.2 Recommended Short Term Service Improvements 34 3.3 Long Term Service Modification & Adjustments 37 3.4 Marketing Plans and Promotion 37 3.5 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes 38 CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL and CAPITAL PLANS 42 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 42 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital 42 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 43 FIGURES Figure 1.1 SunLine Transit Agency Service Area 3 Figure 1.2 SunBus System Map 4 Figure 2 SunBus Fare Structure 19 Figure 3 SunDial Fare Structure 19 Figure 4 Analysis of FY 2011/12 Performance Statistics 23 Figure 5 Fixed Route Service Annual Ridership Comparison 24 Figure 6 Comparison of SunDial FY 10/11 & FY 11/12 Ridership 24 Figure 7 SunDial Service Annual Ridership Comparison 24 TABLES Table 1 Fleet Inventory 21 - 22 Table 2 Ridership Data 29 - 33 Table 3A Individual Route Description 38 Table 3B FY 2013/14 New Route Exemption Sheet 39 Table 3C Data Elements and Route Statistics 40 - 41 Table 4 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2013/14 44 Table 4A Capital Project Justification for FY 2013/14 45 - 55 Table 4.1 Summary of Universal Call for Funding Requests for FY 2013/14 56 Table 5.1 Summary of Funding Request for FY 2014/15 57 Table 5.1.A Capital Project Justification FY 2014/15 58 - 65 Table 5.2 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 66 Table 5.2.A Capital Projects Justification FY 2015/16 67 - 74 Table 6 Audits.. 75 Table 7 Service Provider Performance Target Report 76 Table 8 SRTP Performance Report 77 Table 9 Highlights of FY 2013/14 Short Range Transit Plan 78 Table 9B Fare Revenue Calculation 79 INTRODUCTION The Fiscal Year (FY) 2013/14 through 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) sets the objectives for FY 2013/14 for SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) transit services and capital projects in the Coachella Valley. The SRTP is developed within the context of the regional planning process aimed at implementing SunLine's participation in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan. The development of the SRTP is essential in that it enables staff to fulfill directions from SunLine's Board of Directors and the agency's mission. The FY 2013/14 through 2015/16 SRTP presents a strategic plan for service improvements and capital projects to achieve the objective of the mission statement. The SRTP will be submitted to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) for approval, which will set the framework for requests for federal funds as required by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The SRTP is a three-year capital and operating plan which is approved by SunLine's Board of Directors and RCTC. RCTC is responsible for oversight, funding and coordination of all public transportation services in Riverside County. Although the SRTP is a three-year plan, only the first year of the plan is funded with the remaining two years provided for planning purposes. The SRTP consists of information on SunLine's services and operating characteristics and the annual budget, which is incorporated in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP), State Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), and Federal Transportation Improvement Plan (FTIP). For FY 2013/14, SunLine plans to implement a range of service improvements across the network, primarily service frequency improvements for existing transit lines. This now appears possible with the continued improvement in the economy and associated growth in sales taxes funding for SunLine. There are route alignment changes proposed for lines 24, 53, 90, and 91 to better serve the cities and communities of the Coachella Valley. Federal funding has also been approved for two new transit Lines 54 (Indio — Palm Desert) and 95 (North Shore -Indio). For the subsequent FY 2014/15 and 2015/16, SunLine will continue to monitor predicted funding levels to determine when additional service can be provided on the best performing existing transit lines and any new services where sufficient demand exists, consistent with the goals of the 2009 Comprehensive Operational Analysis study. Based on the 2010 census data, the population of the Coachella Valley within 0.75 miles of the SunLine transit route network grew from 216,374 in 2000 to 281,189 in 2010, a 30 percent increase, while the Coachella Valley's overall population grew by 39 percent in the same period. The latest estimate (January 2012, California Department of Finance) of the Valley's nine cities populations was 354,923 (up 1.2% from 350,659 a year earlier). The agency finished FY 2011/12 with total passenger boardings again exceeding four million, and reaching 4.5 million for the first time in the agency's history. Projections by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) continue to suggest the population of the Coachella Valley will more than double the 2010 population to more than one million residents by 2035, with employment estimates also doubling by the same year. These factors all suggest a significantly larger future role will exist for SunLine in providing a valuable mobility alternative to the private car and to serve those reliant on public transit in the Coachella Valley. MISSION STATEMENT To provide safe and environmentally conscious public transportation services and alternate fuel solutions to meet the mobility needs of the Coachella Valley. 1 CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area SunLine is a Joint Powers Authority created in 1977 to provide public transit service to its member cities and unincorporated communities in the Coachella Valley. Member cities are Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Indio, Coachella, and the unincorporated communities are Thermal, Mecca, Oasis, Bermuda Dunes, and Thousand Palms. SunLine's Board of Directors consists of elected officials from each of the nine member cities and Riverside County, who provide policy direction to the General Manager and staff. The Board meets ten times per year and if necessary, may meet additional times to address pressing operational and budget issues. SunLine's service area is 1,120 square miles with transit service offered throughout the urbanized areas and larger unincorporated communities of the Coachella Valley. The Agency's service area is located approximately 120 miles east of downtown Los Angeles and 60 miles east of the Inland Empire cities of Riverside and San Bernardino. The service area is bounded by the San Gorgonio Pass on the west and the Salton Sea on the southeast. The SunLine Service Area is shown on page 3. SunLine's fixed route service, SunBus, consists of 12 routes connecting the Valley from Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs in the north west to Mecca and Oasis in the south east. Buses operate 363 days a year, with no service provided on Thanksgiving and Christmas. The span of service extends from 4:45 a.m. to 11:21 p.m. weekdays and 5:00 a.m. to 10:36 p.m. on weekends. Buses operate every 20 to 90 minutes, depending on the route and day of the week. Line 111 is the major trunk line that extends from Indio to Palm Springs, with most routes feeding to and from this key route. A system map is shown on page 4 and service information on each route is discussed in Section 1.3 beginning on page 5. The most recent survey undertaken by the Agency in 2008 highlighted four categories of fixed route riders: workers, students, seniors and visitors, of which seventy-one percent are employed or students. Seventy-nine percent of riders are low income, transit dependent, and use SunBus five days or more each week. The survey results indicated that the typical SunLine rider speaks both English and Spanish, has an average income of $20,000, and is between the ages of 23 to 65. School and work are the major trip generators, followed by shopping, medical care, and recreation. Many commuter trips within Coachella Valley are destined for City of Palm Desert, with twenty- three percent of all work trips ending there. Data compiled for trip purposes show that commuting patterns are heavily focused on Palm Desert with most passengers traveling from the cities of Cathedral City, Indio, La Quinta and Palm Springs to Palm Desert. There are also strong commuting patterns from La Quinta and Coachella to Indio, and from Desert Hot Springs to Palm Springs. Most commute trips in the system occur along Highway 111, with nearly all destinations served directly by Line 111. Lines 14 (Desert Hot Springs — Palm Springs) and Line 30 (Cathedral City — Palm Springs) are also key SunLine regional transit lines. 2 Agency Service Area SunLine Tran A1NCIOJ 1VD:13dW1 I A1Nf103 00310 NVS AlNnoa 3UISII3A121 A1Nf103 ONICI8VNa38 NVS PUPS, rm {i a ;F�stz 0 sal'W at s s•z o eaid !pump) haiunwwo) A.tepunoq miomlaN aununs sappy aronbsOZi`I eaad aDvuaS au1lunS 044 n; 4.0.,. mml I'h s raw apivas auiZuns Figure 1.2 System Map Effective January 1, 2013 DESERT 15 HOT SPRINGS ROSA PARKS BAK RAFAEL WCOUErcWEI STEVENS 2: 4 BARISTO u, a MVSSION LAKES F PALM A SPRINGS /6_ r ST PIERSON HACIENDA TwO BUNCH PALMS DON ENGLISH PAUL z M RS A�24TF \'a VISTA CHINO I CATHEDRAL BST CITY oL(6' �o mrc RANCHO MIRAGE AVE 30 DINAH SHORE 0 GERALD FORD = FRANK SINATRA PALM DESERT COMMUTER LINK 220 - Palm Desert to Riverside SunLine Transit Agency 325D5 Harry Oliver Trail THOUSAND PALMS RALD FORD COUNTRY CLUB HYJY 111 i d INDIAN W WELLS AVE 47 MORENO VALLEY BANNING BEAUMONT CABAZON See schedule for details of stop locations ZONE 1 Cabazon to Riverside ru A RANCHO t MIRAGE PALM DESERT 1- ZONE 2-11. Palm Desert to Rancho Mirage SunLine Transit Agency sunBus System Map mapa del Sistema BERMUDA DUNES 0 0 LU Lo 0w Zm w MADRID LA QUINTA TAMPICO CUSTOMER SERVICE SERVICIO AL PASAJERO 1.800.347-8628 www.sunline.org TTYITDD Service Available W INDIO o z s AVE 420 Y V Q Effective 1/13 HWY 111 & FLOWER Transfer Location fa lines 85, 81,90.91&111 AVE 54 iY OASIS �d'n 9" AVE 74 a COACHELLA 5S VE 52 `nAIRPOR VD 3 THERMAL AVE 62 AVE 55 ECCO MECCA/ THERMAL r ST HOME MAKI' HEALTH CENTER MECCA 4 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projection A review of cities with the highest population increase from 2000 through 2010 indicates the City of Coachella grew by 79% followed by the cities of La Quinta, Indio, Desert Hot Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Indian Wells. According to the State Department of Finance data sources, more than 70,000 people moved to the aforementioned cities with the cities of Indio and Coachella gaining the most. Overall, the population in Coachella Valley continues to grow (though more slowly in the last five years) and this growth has helped SunLine achieve over 4.5 million passenger boardings in FY 2011/12 for the first time in the agency's history. 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service Fixed Route Service • Regional Services — These are highly traveled corridors that serve a variety of trip purposes and connect a variety of regional destinations. These routes also comprise the backbone of the network linking major communities. Examples include Line 111, which travels from Palm Springs to Indio, Line 14 between Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs, and Line 30 between Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Typically, the frequency of this type of service should be at least every 15 minutes with consistent service provided throughout the day. SunLine has a longer term goal of increasing the frequency of these three lines to every 15 minutes daytime weekdays. The agency is planning in FY2013/14 to achieve a shorter -term goal of every 20 minutes weekdays for Lines 14 and 30 (Line 111 already operates every 20 minutes weekdays). • Local Community -Based Services — These routes are established to provide benefits for one or more local communities and offer all -day circulation as well as connections to regional services. Lines 15, 24, 32, 53, 70, 80, 81, 90, and 91 are examples of this type of service. These routes should have consistent service throughout each day, have frequencies of 60 minutes or better, and have frequent stops for passengers to access as many destinations as possible. A number of these local services (Line 70 is an example) are performing strongly both in terms of ridership and productivity (rides per hour of service), and are candidates for increased service levels in FY 2013/14 or future years based on prioritization of all needs and available funding levels. • Market -Based Services — These types of services are tailored to serve specific segments at specific times of the day, including supplemental service such as school trippers. These routes have flexible routing and schedules, may vary throughout the day and week, and are tailored to specific market targets and defined market needs. An example of this service is the Palm Desert — Riverside Commuter Link 220 bus route implemented September 10, 2012. Information about each of SunLine's fixed route services, including both regional and local community -based services, are provided on the next several pages. 5 LINE 14: DESERT HOT SPRINGS - PALM SPRINGS Line 14 links the cities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs. The route connects to Line 15 (Desert Hot Springs), Line 24 (Palm Springs), Line 30 (Cathedral City/Palm Springs), Line 32 (Thousand Palms/Rancho Mirage/Palm Desert/Cathedral City/Palm Springs), and Line 111 (Highway 111). The route links riders with local shopping centers, middle and high schools, and other services within the communities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs. The route offers service to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the Employment Development Department, and a number of retail centers along the route. This route was very well used in FY 2011/12, requiring additional morning peak period supplementary trips. Line 14 operates on a 35-minute headway weekdays (plus 3 extra morning peak and one extra afternoon peak trips), and weekends on a 45-minute headway. In FY 2013/14, it is proposed to upgrade this service to every 20 minutes weekday peak periods and every 30-minutes weekday midday and weekends. The route alignment is not proposed to be changed. MISSION LAKES DESERT �— HOT SPRINGS PIERSON TWO BUNCH PALMS VISTA CHINO J J W Q J_ Z -(-5 U W cn 2 w a J J Z a U TAHQUITZ � BARISTO RAMON LL J Q d DILLON J } W Z� LL I C9 Q PAUL 0 N A O TIME POINT PALM SPRINGS 6 LINE 15: SPA CITY LOOP — CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Line 15 was introduced in September 2010 to serve the community of Desert Hot Springs. It connects to Line 14 (Palm Springs/Desert Hot Springs) as well as links riders with local shopping centers, middle and high schools, and other services provided within the City of Desert Hot Springs. Line 15 offers service to the community center, and key local retail stores. The route operates 21 trips on weekdays and 18 trips on weekends, operating on a 45-minute headway all week. In FY 2013/14, this service is proposed to be increased to every 40 minutes weekdays and weekends with a slightly reduced span of service 6 a.m. — 8 p.m. weekdays and 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. weekends. This change reflects the low early morning and evening ridership the route has been carrying. The route alignment is not proposed to be changed. 2ND ST PIERSON w Q co w v HACIENDA O2 04=." DESERT HOT SPRINGS AN TWO BUNCH PALMS O TIME POINT 7 LINE 24: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Line 24 offers service in Palm Springs with connections available with Line 14 (Desert Hot Springs/Cathedral City/Palm Springs), Line 30 (Cathedral City/Palm Springs), Line 32 (Thousand Palms/Rancho Mirage/Palm Desert/Cathedral City/Palm Springs) and Line 111 (Highway 111). This route links riders to destinations such as the Desert Regional Hospital, Palm Springs International Airport, Palm Springs City Hall, Desert Highland Community Center, middle and high schools, and a number of key retail outlets. Line 24 operates 19 roundtrips on weekdays and 17 roundtrips during weekends, with a 45- minute headway provided all week. It is proposed in FY 2013/14 to revise the Line 24 route at South Palm Springs to travel via Baristo Road, El Cielo Road, Tahquitz Canyon Way, and Farrell Street back to Baristo Road (see map below). This avoids the need for students from Palm Springs High School to board the service as it proceeds towards the airport. It is also proposed to operate 40-minute weekday and 60-minute weekend service in place of 45-minute existing 7-day service frequency on this route. Extra trips will be added to accommodate the high student boardings before and after school. The service will operate last trips approximately 7 p.m. in each direction due to very low ridership on existing later trips. CURRENT N A 0 w 0 ROSA PARKS RD STEVENS TACHEVAH z U 2 a O TIME POINT SAN RAFAF VISTA CHINO TAHQUITZ BARISTO PALM SPRINGS J W cC cC LL U PROPOSED 0 d A 5 ROSA PARKS RQ �SyP P� G STEVENS TACHEVAH SAN RAFAEL VISTA CHINO BARISTO PALM SPRINGS N A TAHQUITZ w U U J w 8 LINE 30: CATHEDRAL CITY — PALM SPRINGS Line 30 is the system's most productive route (highest passenger boardings per hour of service), providing a key regional link between the cities of Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Within these communities, riders are able to access the city libraries, city halls, senior centers, the Palm Springs and Cathedral City high schools, and various commercial and industrial centers. Line 30 connects to Line 14 (Desert Hot Springs/Palm Springs), Line 24 (Palm Springs), Line 32 (Thousand Palms/Rancho Mirage/Palm Desert/Cathedral City/Palm Springs) and Line 111 (Highway 111). Line 30 operates a 30-minute headway weekdays and a 40-minute headway weekends. One extra morning and afternoon trip is added to this line to accommodate high numbers of school students traveling. At the beginning of 2013, the Line 30 terminus at Cathedral City was relocated to a new location on B Street at Buddy Rogers where all route 30 and 111 stops can be located together for easier passenger connections. This change has worked out well. In FY 2013/14, it is proposed to upgrade the weekday daytime frequency on this service to every 20- minutes. The route alignment is not proposed to be changed. TAHQUITZ PALM CYN BARISTO RAMON al W JJ �_ QU UZ � IL � PALM SPRINGS O TIME POINT NA RAMON J .J w CC CC Q u_ CATHEDRAL CITY CATHEDRAL CITY Z 0 J Q ct d W z H U PEREZ E. pkif � CYhr DATE PALM DINAH SHORE VICTORIA 9 LINE 32: PALM SPRINGS - CATHEDRAL CITY - THOUSAND PALMS RANCHO MIRAGE - PALM DESERT Line 32 links the cities of Palm Springs, and Cathedral City with the community of Thousand Palms, and the cities of Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert. This line connects with Line 14 (Desert Hot Springs/Palm Springs), Line 111 (Highway 111), Line 30 (Cathedral City/Palm Springs), and Line 53 (Palm Desert). Riders can access the Palm Springs middle and elementary schools, and various retail centers along Ramon Road in Cathedral City. Routing over the Monterey/I-10 Interchange ensures access to Costco, Home Depot, Regal Cinemas 16 theater complex and service to the Agua Caliente Casino on Ramon Road at Bob Hope Drive. This route also provides service to the Eisenhower Medical Center, College of the Desert, and Westfield Palm Desert Mall. Line 32 operates weekdays on a 50-minute headway and weekends on a 70-minute headway. It is proposed to extend Line 32 weekend frequency be increased to 60 minutes. It is also planned in subsequent years (subject to funding) to increase the weekday service frequency to every 40 minutes. The route alignment is not proposed to be changed. VISTA CHINO a J J a ct a n - -7 AVE 30 G a - � w MISSION 1-- RAMON r w cc zcl) ul3 PALM SPRINGS O TIME POINT FV A CATHEDRAL CITY THOUSAND ao PALMS Pf) WJ _uJ RAMON (n❑ RANCHO MIRAGE DINAH SHORE Et o a o m 0 m MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB JOHN L SINN PALM HAHN DESERT z� �cc O f- HO MONTEREY FRED WARING HWY 111 10 LINE 53: CITY OF PALM DESERT Line 53 provides service within the city of Palm Desert, which enables riders on the route to access College of the Desert, the McCallum Theater, Palm Desert City Hall, Kaiser Permanente, California State University San Bernardino (CSUSB), University of California Riverside, Palm Desert High School, Palm Desert Library, and major shopping centers, including Westfield Palm Desert Mall. Line 53 connects with Line 111 at two locations; at Westfield Palm Desert Mall and on Highway 111 at Deep Canyon, as well as connecting with Line 32 at Westfield Palm Desert Mall. Line 53 operates weekdays and weekends every 80 minutes. This line was created in September 2010 as a modified version of former Line 50, focusing on linking CSUSB with Palm Desert Mall directly via Cook Street. In FY 2013/14, it is proposed that Line 53 be rerouted to serve Country Club Drive between Cook Street and Portola Avenue, as well as the Joslyn Center on Catalina Way, plus a short extension north of the 1-10 freeway to serve Xavier School (see map below). The service would also be revised to operate between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m. weekdays and between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. weekends, with some increased service frequency on weekdays in the morning and afternoon school and college peak travel times. This is in line with existing ridership trends. All of these changes are intended to improve the performance of this route. CURRENT WN CENTER WAY z Q PALM DESERT GERALD FORD NA Y O O U HOVLEY FRED WARING DEEP CYN INDIAN WELLS O TIME POINT PROPOSED TOWN CENTER WAY PALM DESERT SAN PABLO COUNTRY CLUB wz INDIAN o WELLS 11 LINE 70: CITY OF LA QUINTA Line 70 offers bus service to the city of La Quinta and the edge of the cities of Palm Desert and Indian Wells, and the unincorporated community of Bermuda Dunes. Riders are able to access the City Hall and senior center in La Quinta, local schools, and various retail shopping centers along Adams Street and Avenue 47. Connections can be made with Line 111 on Highway 111 at Adams Street. Line 70 operates a 45-minute headway weekdays and a 90-minute headway during weekends. Extra morning and afternoon trips are added to accommodate the high number of students utilizing this service. Future plans (not funded at this time) propose to increase the peak period service to every 20 minutes weekday mornings and afternoons, every 40 minutes weekday midday, and every 60 minutes weekends between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. Also under study for future years is an extension of this transit line north along Washington Street approximately 0.5 miles to serve the many businesses located there and the entrance to Sun City Del Webb community of nearly 10,000 residents (see map below). This extension is subject to some required bus stop infrastructure changes being completed. These proposed improvements, in response to high ridership and productivity of this route, may be possible in FY14-15 or 15-16. CURRENT COUNTRY CLUB BERMUDA HARRIS LANE DUNES PALM NA n INDIAN MILES WELLS u-) 2 a c� a SINALOA OBREGON ASHINGTON TAMPICO EISENHOWER BERMUDAS MADRID BLACKHAWK WAY HWY 111 AVE 47 LA QUINTA LA QUINTA COVE 0 TIME POINT PROPOSED LAS MONTANAS EL DESIERT0-0. WILDCAT SUN CITY PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB BERMUDA DUNES PALM z DESERT FREE WARING INDIAN WELLS N A SI NALOA OBREGON HWY iii AVE 47 SHINGTON AVE 50 TAMPICO MILES s w O x LA QUINTA z COVE w E MADRID BLACKHAWK WAY LA QUINTA BERMUDAS 12 LINES 80 and 81: LOOP ROUTES — CITY OF INDIO Lines 80 and 81 are loop routes that provide transit service to residents of the City of Indio, enabling them to access civic, educational, county offices, as well as public and social service offices. This includes John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Riverside County Fair & National Date Festival, Employment Development Department, East Valley College of the Desert campus, Riverside County social services offices, Department of Motor Vehicles, Martha's Village & Kitchen, Coachella Valley Cultural Museum, Indio Senior and Teen Centers and library, local schools, and a variety of retail shopping centers within the community. Line 81 was introduced January 2012 as a variation on one of the two directions of the Line 80 loop route. Line 81 serves the new retail developments north of the 1-10 highway. At the same time, Line 80 was modified to service the Indio Senior and Teen Centers. Lines 80 and 81 connect to Line 90 (Coachella/Indio), Line 91 (Indio/Coachella/Thermal/ Mecca/Oasis) and Line 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 at Flower Street in the City of Indio. These two lines each operate daily on 60-minute headways. There are no planned changes to these two services in FY 2013/14 but there are longer term plans to increase their frequency to every 30 minutes weekdays (subject to funding). There is also a study underway of the transit needs of the North Indio area. LINE 80 INDIO A O TIME POINT LINE 81 INDIO A O TIME POINT 13 LINE 90: CITIES OF COACHELLA AND INDIO Line 90 serves the cities of Coachella and Indio allowing passengers to access the Employment Development Department, and the Coachella city hall, library, senior center, Boys & Girls Club, local schools and shopping centers. Connections to Lines 80 and 81 (Indio), Line 91 (Indio/Coachella/Thermal/Mecca/Oasis) and Line 111 (Highway 111) occur at the transfer location on Highway 111 at Flower Street in Indio. Line 90 operates weekdays and weekends on a 35-minute headway. In FY 2013/14, it is proposed to revise Line 90 to serve more of the south west section of Coachella as shown in the map below (an associated change would also be made to Line 91). It is also proposed to revise Line 91 to operate every 40 minutes daytime weekdays and every 60 minutes weeknights and weekends in line with existing levels of ridership. CURRENT cc 1.1 u_ CALHOUN Z IL CC D m Z AVE 50 INDIO O TIME POINT HARRISON COACHELLA PROPOSED c, W 0 INDIO 14 LINE 91: INDIO — COACHELLA — THERMAL — MECCA - OASIS The Line 91 links the cities of Indio and Coachella with the unincorporated communities of Thermal, Mecca, and Oasis. Riders on Line 91 are able to connect to Lines 80 and 81, 90, and 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 and Flower Street at Indio. This allows passengers to access employment sites, medical and shopping facilities. Line 91 also provides direct service to College of the Desert's East Valley Campus at Mecca. Line 91 operates a 60-minute headway weekdays and an 80-minute headway weekends. In conjunction with Line 90 changes proposed for FY 2013/14, Line 91 is proposed to have its route slightly revised at Coachella, a short extension to serve Mountain View Estates at Oasis area, and to operate every 60 minutes instead of every 80 minutes weekends. If plans to extend Line 111 to Coachella occur in FY 2013/14, then this service will be subject to further change such as terminating at Coachella. CURRENT HWY 111 '2 e�LO LL AVE 50 z rn x INDIO J } ST THERMAL OASIS 66, h0 O� COACHELLA AIRPORT BLVD AVE 66 N A s� r9_ a a x AVE 62 MECCA BIROS MOBILE HOME PARK z J 5r" ST x O TIME POINT PROPOSED SunLine's O Indio Fapilitq HWY 111 ya, m 0 AVE 50 OASIS INDIO 1� MOUNTAIN yIEW ESTATE 'per COACHELLA "1)G A 7G AIRPORT BLVD s � a coo MeualThermal D Canino o z MECCA 15 LINE 111: INDIO — PALM SPRINGS KEY REGIONAL LINE Line 111 offers service along Highway 111 from Palm Springs to Indio, linking with the cities of Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and La Quinta. Line 111 enables riders to travel to destinations along the Highway 111 corridor and connects to all routes in the system except for Line 15. Connecting routes include Line 14 (Desert Hot Springs/Palm Springs), Line 24 (Palm Springs), Line 30 (Palm Springs/Cathedral City), Line 32 (Palm Desert/Rancho Mirage/Thousand Palms/Cathedral City/Palm Springs), Line 53 (Palm Desert), Line 70 (La Quinta/Indian Wells/Bermuda Dunes/Palm Desert), Lines 80 and 81 (Indio), Line 90 (Coachella/Indio), and Line 91 (Indio/Coachella/Thermal/Mecca/Oasis). This route links riders with major retail and commercial centers, recreational attractions, museums, educational and medical institutions, municipal and county services. Line 111 operates weekdays on a 20-minute headway and weekends on a 40-minute headway. In FY 2013/14, Line 111 is proposed to be upgraded to operate weekends every 20 minutes between 9 a.m. and 6 pm. This will be funded by revising Line 111 early morning (pre 6 a.m.) and evening (after 6 p.m.) frequency weekdays from every 20 to every 30 minutes in line with ridership levels at those times. The line will also be extended to Coachella, though the exact details of the terminus at Coachella are still being planned. CURRENT STEVENS VISTA CHINO TAHOLI ITZ BAR ISTO �I ENciiin RAMON Z Aq U PALM � SPRINGS CATHEDRAL CITY N A O TIME POINT PROPOSED VISTA CHINO STEVENS BARISTO dV PALM SPRINGS A AHOUITZ ,g&kE eucwr RAMON t zw 7; 8ST LL CATHEDRAL CITY PALM DESERT RANCHO ry11, MIRAGE �� A o a PALM DESERT EE PALM CYN ,1l CATHEDRAL CITY / INDIAN WELLS LA QUINTA �rN PALM DESERT CATHEDRAL CITY RANCHO MIRAGE H� PALM DESERT INDIAN WELLS LA QUINTA m a 11 HWY 111 INDIO INDIO INDIO z 0 COACHELLA a z INDIO 16 LINE 220: PALM DESERT — RIVERSIDE COMMUTER LINK Line 220, introduced in September 2012, offers service between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County. Two trips are operated weekday mornings westbound, with two trips returning eastbound weekday afternoon/evenings. The route is 73 miles long, and has two stops in the Coachella Valley, located at Palm Desert Mall and at Monterey Avenue/1-10 Highway at Palm Desert/Rancho Mirage. There are also stops in the Pass Cities (Morongo Casino/Cabazon, Banning, Beaumont), plus two stops in Moreno Valley, then finally a stop at University of California Riverside and the downtown Riverside Metrolink train and bus stations. While there are no increases in service planned for Line 220 in FY 2013/14, there are longer term plans to increase the service weekdays to ten trips (weekend service might then be considered). A consolidation of the stops at Banning and Beamont to a location on the boundary between the two cities is also being studied. The Monterey Avenue stop at Palm Desert/Rancho Mirage will be located to SunLine's planned new transit hub on Varner Road at Thousand Palms when it opens in 2014. A stop is also being studied for 1-10 at Palm Drive to connect with SunLine Line 14 (connecting to/from Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs). Riverside Downtown Terminal Metrolink Station UCR Lot 30 RIVERSIDE MORENO VALLEY O TIME POINT FARE ZONE 1 BANNING BEAUMONT CASINO MORONGO CABAZON Cabazon to Riverside NA RANCHO MIRAGE w FARE ZONE 2 o m PALM DESERT Palm desert to Rancho Mirage 17 PARATRANSIT INFORMATION SunLine's paratransit service, SunDial, offers curb -to -curb service designed to meet requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and offers next -day complementary demand -response service to Coachella Valley residents unable to use fixed route service. All applicants must complete an application, describing in detail the nature of their mental or physical disability that would prevent a person from using regular fixed route service. Applicants must obtain a physician's (or approved health care professional's) statement and signature verifying their disability. Each applicant is notified in writing within twenty-one days upon review of their applications. Certified riders that have the required ADA Certification Identification Card are eligible to use SunDial for their transportation needs, including medical appointments, shopping, and other social activities. SunDial service is available within 3/4 miles on either side of the existing SunBus route network, and is available by advanced reservation. Reservation is based on fixed route service hours serving passengers' origin and destination. SunDial is provided 7 days a week, 363 days a year during the same hours as the fixed -route network. No service is provided on Thanksgiving and Christmas. In addition to SunDial service, in November 2011 the agency introduced a Taxi Voucher Program, providing half price taxi trips for seniors (60+ years) and the disabled, within the agency's service area (not restricted to within 0.75 miles of fixed route services). This is funded in part from federal New Freedom Section 5317 funds. Consolidated Transportation Services Agency [CTSA] As the designated CTSA, SunLine coordinates public transportation services throughout its service area, including providing mobility training and assisting with grant applications. Staff participates in meetings with social and human service agencies, bus riders, and other advocates through forums such as the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service Transportation Advisory Committee, SunLine's Access Committee, T-NOW, and neighboring transit operators. As part of the Call for Projects issued in FY 2011, SunLine acts as a pass -through agency for funding received from the Section 5316 (JARC) and Section 5317 (New Freedom) through the Federal Transit Administration awarded to RCTC's Rideshare program, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Roy's Center Shuttle, Mobility Management, to offer specialized transportation service options to Coachella Valley residents. In FY 2013/14, the 2013 Call for Projects will introduce new volunteer driver mileage reimbursement and other travel programs through Independent Living Partnership and Desert Samaritans through Section 5317 (New Freedom) funding. 18 1.4 Current Fare Structure SunLine's current fare structure consists of four fare categories: adult, youth, Senior (60+)/Disabled, and persons with disabilities who use SunDial. SunLine fixed route passengers pay the adult fare unless eligible for discounted fares which are available only to seniors, the disabled and youth. There are two fare payment options: cash and passes.Children 4 years and under ride free with an adult fare. In FY 2010/11, staff completed a Fare Study which examined scenarios for possible fare increases. There are no plans for a fare rise in FY 2013/14. Figures 2 and 3 shown below highlight the current fare structure. FIGURE 2: SunBus Fare Structure TYPE OF FARE FARE CATEGORY FIXED -ROUTE FARES ADULT (18 YRS — 59 YRS) YOUTH (5 YRS — 17 YRS) SENIOR 60+/ DISABLED/MEDICAID Cash/Base Fare $1.00 $.85 $.50 Transfers $.25 $.25 $.25 Day Pass $3.00 $2.00 $1.50 31-Day Pass $34.00 $24.00 $17.00 10-Ride Pass $10.00 $8.50 $5.00 Coachella Valley Employer Pass $24.00 -- -- Commuter Express Single Ride $6.00 -- $4.00 Commuter Express Day Pass $14.00 -- $10.00 Commuter Express 30-Day Pass $150.00 -- $100.00 Commuter Express fares are for trips between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County on the Riverside Commuter Link 220 Service implemented in September 2012. FIGURE 3: SunDial Fare Structure TYPE OF FARE (Only for ADA Certified Clients) SINGLE RIDE MULTIPLE RIDES (10-RIDE) Cash Fare - Same City $1.50 -- Cash Fare - City to City $2.00 -- 10-Ride Pass - Same City -- $15.00 10-Ride Pass — City to City -- $20.00 19 1.5 Revenue Fleet SunLine currently has 69 fixed route buses and 31 ADA paratransit vans. Additionally, there are 38 support vehicles used for various activities in support of transit services provided in the Coachella Valley. Two new hydrogen fuel cell buses should be delivered in 2014. Grant applications are also active for conversion of one out of service bus to be restored to service with alternative fuel sources, as well as for two additional vans for increased paratransit service. 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities Operational Facilities SunLine's head office is located in Thousand Palms and houses the General Administration, Operations, Maintenance, Human Resources, and Planning Departments. SunLine staff is currently housed in a number of mobile home structures that date back to the mid-1980s. These structures have passed their useful life and are costly to maintain. SunLine has worked closely with the Riverside County Departments of Planning and Transportation to obtain necessary permits for construction of a new Administration Building. A ground breaking ceremony was held for the construction of this facility on February 26, 2013 and the building should be completed by mid-2014. In conjunction with the new Administration Building at Thousand Palms, SunLine will build a transit hub and Park and Ride facility for use by commuters traveling from the Coachella Valley to Western Riverside County on the new Commuter Link 220 bus service implemented in September 2012. Future unfunded phases of the facility project would see new Operations and Maintenance facilities built. During 2013/14, SunLine will study options to rehabilitate or replace the agency's Indio satellite operating and maintenance facility which is utilized for both fixed route and ADA paratransit vehicles. The key transfer point for passengers transferring among routes at Indio is located just outside of this facility, and a capital project to provide restrooms for this facility is proposed for FY 2013/14. FY 2013/14 will also see work commence on the study/design and construction of a new CNG fueling station at Thousand Palms, replacing the twenty-year old original CNG fueling station. 1.7 Taxi Administration The SunLine Regulatory Administration (SRA), which is charged with licensing and regulating taxicab franchises and drivers in the Coachella Valley, also ensures residents and visitors are charged a fair and reasonable price. In addition, SRA is responsible for establishing and enforcing ethical standards maintained by the Franchising Board. Fleet Franchises Desert City Cab Yellow Cab of the Desert American Cab 20 SStLIZ L19`066` 1 611`9E9`ZT 0 69 69 Laf :sle1ol E6e9ET 611`L9Z 1£9`LZZ 61,0`6EZ 1,OI`179 9SE`911 11�`ZS E6e9ET 99L`900 $ 6917`179L`f 6L6`09L`f. 1701`179 E9S`E9T `1 11�`ZS E6e9ET 906`EE9`E fr171`196`£ 006`LL0`17 099'99 frLZ`6Z6 ZZOrZZ Of. N7 Of N7 ao N7 a0 o� ZE ,Ofr OEE-V ,017A NOIa0 ,O17 Al ,O17 Al ,O17 Al 2CAGID!aZ3 SSDXV NdA I90 VAN VAN VAN Na3 Na3 1700Z S00Z 900Z 900Z 900Z 600Z Z10Z £i/ZIOZ Al (gpaew 1.6.a) ale U-ol-sea), JO sV aPlgaA aAnYtif aad sallw awgapi a6eaaAV £i/ZIOZ Al ILpaew g6nonn saliA1 aplgaA ale0 04 al!l ZI/TIOZ Al pu3 aea,4 naiad sallW ap!gah ale° oa alp' £i/ZIOZ Al sa plga h #3ua6uquo] # £i/ZIOZ Al saplgaA ahlapV # ara] ad#1 lanl ga6ual aplgah paddmb3 Aipede] dwell 6waeas pue!l aP°3 IaP014 aPo] mpg '61w aea,4 paleaadp Ap]aAa / (sngaolow) sn0 #3ua6V a!suealaununs ue{d •sue-1/ abue2f4-fvc{sPI CIOZ.if JOWOAuI laald - alga] 1WWWE5mpW&M4.41uaa 1FUN4 EmE 1.0 L6e6LT EOZ`99S`9 £88`£t.9$ 0 T£ Ti 90 MR01 069'9C 0.68`99 T60`9££ ZLS`SOS T9£`LT,£ OLtSOL$ frLL`£L 9SL`T9Z C9C90C$ 0 £T �T N7 N7 N7 9Z 9Z 9Z fi? fi +r T ZT ZT ZT H73102iJV H73102i3V H73102i3V NO3 ZTOZ NC3 OTOZ NC3 900Z £i/ZIOZ A3 (gaael4 1.6.a) ale U-ol-sea), JO sV aPlgaA aAnYtif aad Bali m1 awgapi a6eaaAV £i/ZIOZ A3 g3aew g6nonn saliA1 apigaA a4ea 04 Olin ZI/TIOZ A3 pug aea,4 naiad salil apigah ale° eq a�ig £i/ZIOZ A3 saplgah Ama6uquo3 # £i/ZIOZ A3 sapigah aAnpv # aPo 3 ad#1 lang ga6ual apigah paddy -kb' #apede3 dwell 6waeas pue ill aPo 3 IaP014 apo3 •6j1,4 mpg aea,4 paleaad❑ Appaal❑ / asuadsaN puma❑ #3ua6V a!suealaununs ue{d Psi/94 abuer{ 4-fv Sfs PI CIOZ.i f JOWOAuI laald - alga] IWRIE E5mpW61.04.4= ly.A54 EmE 1.0 CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE and ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service - Route by Route Evaluation and Analysis Over the last five years, SunLine has made improvements to all fixed routes, including realigning existing routes and improving frequency to increase ridership. A review of the FY 2011/12 data indicates an increase over the same period for FY 2010/11. Service Efficiency and Effectiveness To determine the efficiency effectiveness of all routes, staff reviewed the year-to-date performance statistics for FY 2011/12 with data from TransTrack below that shows the most and least efficient routes. Factors used include passenger boardings, passengers per revenue hour, cost per passenger, passenger revenue per hour, and the farebox recovery ratio. FIGURE 4: Analysis of FY 2011/12 Performance Statistics LINES PASSENGER COUNT PASSENGER PER REVENUE HOUR COST PER PASSENGER PASSENGER REVENUE PER HOUR FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 14 519,958 22.7 $4.15 $18.92 20.06% 15 97,262 17.7 $5.33 $14.68 15.57% 24 192,019 17.8 $5.29 $14.83 15.73% 30 788,174 36.6 $2.58 $30.46 32.32% 32 245,758 14.9 $6.33 $12.36 13.11 % 53 1,530 23.6 $4.06 $17.76 18.54% 70 51,349 9.1 $10.41 $7.51 7.96% 80 246,863 25.4 $3.71 $21.02 22.31 81 183,252 22.6 $4.06 $19.29 21.01 % 90 49,779 18.5 $5.50 $14.18 13.94% 91 224,930 19.0 $4.96 $15.84 16.80% 111 233,627 15.3 $6.17 $12.67 13.46% SunDial 1,602,416 26.7 $3.53 $22.22 23.58% 23 FIGURE 5 below depicts a graph showing fixed route ridership comparison from FY 2008 through FY 2012. 490,000 420,000 350,000 280,000 210,000 140,000 70,000 0 FIXED ROUTE RIDERSHIP COMPARISON FY 2008 - FY 2012 JU L AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JU N oFY 2008 o FY 2009 OFY 2010 o FY 2011 oFY 2012 2.2 Paratransit Service — System Performance SunDial's paratransit services offered in the Coachella Valley continue to be well utilized for clients day to day activities, such as medical appointments, shopping, or for work. A total of 124,720 trips were made on SunDial in FY 2011/12 compared to 110,462 trips in FY 2010/11. Overall, ridership for the demand response and subscription continues to grow. FIGURE 6: Comparison of SunDial FY 2010/11 & FY 2011/12 Ridership SERVICE TYPE FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 PERCENT CHANGE SunDial 110,462 124,720 12.9% FIGURE 7 below compares usage of SunDial services from FY2008 through FY2012. 15,000 - 12,000 8,000 4,000 - SUNDIAL RIDERSHIP COMPARISON FY 2008 - FY 2012 JUL AUG SEPT ❑CT Na. DEC JAN FEB f lAR APR f•1AY JUN o FY 2008 o FY 2009 o FY 2010 o FY 2011 o FY 2012 24 Specialized Transit Service The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) received Section 5316 (JARC) funds to continue operation of a transportation program to serve homeless residents sheltered at the Roy's Desert Resource Center who are looking for employment. The Riverside County Transportation Commission [ROTC] continues to receive JARC funding to implement a Rideshare Program for the Coachella Valley. SunLine has also received JARC and New Freedom funds to implement the new Commuter Express route to Riverside (Commuter Link 220 — implemented September 2012). In addition, SunLine was awarded New Freedom funds to implement a Taxi Voucher Program for seniors, persons with disabilities, and persons with low income. This program commenced operation in November 2011, and was converted from paper vouchers to a smartcard system in November 2012. New allocations of funding (from the RCTC 2013 Call for projects) will see volunteer driver mileage reimbursement or other transportation programs for seniors and the disabled established in the Coachella Valley by Independent Living Partnership and Desert Samaritans. Also, funding was allocated for a two-year trial of a new SunLine transit route for North Shore and two additional years of funding for the Riverside Commuter Link 220 service (funded through FY 2015/16). 2.3 Key Performance Indicators To ensure adherence to the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) established by RCTC, SunLine continues to monitor and evaluate routes to assure compliance with key performance indicators. The performance indicators are tracked through a management performance tool called TransTrack, implemented by RCTC for all transit operators. Over the last five years, SunLine has consistently met all key performance indicators approved in the SRTP, including the mandatory target for the farebox recovery ratio. 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts Staff continues to work in coordination and cooperation with local jurisdictions on service related issues that affect transit services provided in the Coachella Valley. Staff will continue monitoring service routes using service warrants to further evaluate routes. In addition to concentrating on modifying and adjusting service routes, further analysis will be undertaken to review unproductive routes to determine if segments or trips of existing routes should be discontinued due to low productivity. 2.5 Service Standards and Warrants The following factors listed below are considered when analyzing new service proposals and requests,as well as evaluating existing service. Area Coverage: While most of the urbanized sections of SunLine's service area are adequately served according to these standards, there are some areas which are served more intensely than others. When service is proposed, the new route should be evaluated based on its proximity to others, and the necessity of its implementation based on area coverage standards. Currently not served or underserved markets such as North Shore, Desert Edge/Sky Valley, and North Indio may provide some potential new transit ridership but also significant additional operating costs each year for the provision of a transit serve. ADA paratransit service needs must also be addressed as part of any such new service planning. Funding of these types of services must be prioritized along with improvements to existing transit services, based on available funding. SunLine is working with the communities of North Shore, Desert Edge/Sky Valley, and North Indio to determine what transit service may be appropriate and sustainable in such 25 communities. A successful grant application was submitted for federal funding (JARC 5316) for the trial of a new transit service for North Shore. It is planned to implement this service in September 2013. The Desert Valley/Sky Valley and North Indio areas remain under study. Market Area Characteristics: Staff also considers the density and demographic characteristics of a given service area as an important determinant for providing successful transit success. In tying area coverage standards to population and employment densities, SunLine recognizes the need to provide more service within more highly developed areas, and often considers this factor as part of the service development process. Transit -Dependent Populations: SunLine considers the effects of service changes on transit - dependent riders during service planning processes. While SunLine's current network serves most transit -dependent populations and their destinations effectively, the agency continues to examine transit -dependency when evaluating new service proposals. Special Market Needs: Staff often receives requests for new service when existing routes do not adequately address unique market opportunities. Short routes such as shuttles, for example, may better connect two or more high demand destinations; for instance, a transit center and an employment center, a senior center and a shopping complex; student housing and a university campus. They also provide local circulation between destinations in a single community with the service span and frequency tailored to these unique markets. Recommended Standards of Evaluating New Services: Once a route is implemented, performance monitoring begins immediately to determine if the route is reaching its desired potential and to meet performance standards. New service routes that do not meet minimum standards are subject to the same remedial actions as existing services and may be evaluated at the one and two year marks, in order to evaluate how new service routes are progressing over time. The SunLine Board will be asked to adopt a new set of service standards for transit service performance in FY 2012/13. 2.6 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Markets over Next Two Years SunLine continues to evaluate, monitor, and adjust transit service to best meet the travel needs of the residents of and visitors to the Coachella Valley. SunLine implemented a new Commuter Link 220 service to Western Riverside County in FY 2012/13. It is proposing significant service improvements in FY 2013/14, based on an improved economic climate and increased funding availability. The agency will continue tracking both existing service usage and new developments to ensure service is offered where the most need exists. Through the Agency's development review program, staff works in cooperation and concert with local jurisdictions to determine where new developments are occurring and what the associated transit service needs and opportunities are. As the Coachella Valley continues to grow, SunLine will assess areas in which additional transit could potentially be provided. Staff submitted successful grant applications for a new North Shore bus service and an additional two years of funding for the Riverside Commuter Link 220 bus service in response to RCTC's 2013 Specialized Transportation Call for projects. Additionally, given the lack of funding to provide school transportation service by the school districts in the Valley, SunLine will continue working with school districts to improve access to public transit and will work on coordinating school bell times for routing and scheduling purposes. 26 2.7 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs Passenger Amenities and Bus Stop Improvement Program SunLine serves 548 bus stops, which are cleaned and maintained on a regular basis. Since completion of the 2006 COA and 2009 COA Update, SunLine has made significant improvements to bus stops in the Coachella Valley. Currently 284 bus stops have a shelter shed, and a further 85 stops are planned to receive this facility by the end of FY 2012/13 (70 new shelters, 15 relocated out of service shelters). These improvements will mean over two-thirds of SunLine bus stops will have this facility at that time. Funding is being requested for 38 additional shelters in FY 2013/14, with some shelters upgraded with solar powered lighting. Revenue Collection Equipment In 2010, SunLine installed electronic registering fareboxes on all fixed route buses. This has increased the agency's ability to collect more accurate revenue, decreased staff's time in reconciling revenue collected, and improved the accuracy of ridership counts. It has also enhanced passenger access to passes through allowing for their sale on -board buses. In addition to new fareboxes, one ticket vending machine (TVM) continues in operation at the key transfer location in Indio. A study of the success of the first TVM machine is proposed to be completed before a decision is taken regarding installation of additional ticket vending machines in the Valley. On -Board Security Cameras SunLine has interior and exterior video cameras installed on all fixed route buses to improve the Agency's ability to monitor and record activities inside and outside the buses that will enhance the safety and security of passengers. With these cameras, SunLine is able to investigate criminal and suspicious activities that may occur at bus stops, transfer locations and while the buses travel on the road. Furthermore, to enhance the safety of passengers on ADA paratransit vans, Smart Drive technology has been installed. This system enables monitoring, tracking and real-time data on activities occurring on these vans, which helps improve driver training and skills. In FY 2012/13, Prop 1 B Transit Security funds will be used to upgrade camera systems on 41 New Flyer buses. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) By the end of 2011, installation of ITS equipment on all fixed route and paratransit buses was completed, with installation on select support vehicles being completed in the first half of 2012. The equipment includes Automatic Passenger Counters, Automatic Voice Annunciators, Automated Vehicle Locaters, and Global Positioning Systems. Additionally, staff implemented scheduling software for fixed route planning. SunLine service information has been available in Google Transit for trip planning purposes since March 2012. W-Fi was introduced on four Commuter Link buses in 2012, and is planned to expanded to the full fixed route and paratransit fleets in FY 2013/14. Bus Replacement Program SunLine continues to replace ADA paratransit vans when they exceed 150,000 miles (approx. 3 years). 14 replacement vans are to be delivered in FY 2012/13, with a further 4 vans to be replaced in FY 2013/14 (plus two extra vans for increased service). The fixed route bus fleet will next be updated in 2018, when the 2006 Orion buses become eligible for federal funding for replacement (12-year lifespan). All SunLine vehicles (including support vehicles) are powered with compressed natural gas except for three Hydrogen fuel cell buses. Two agency 27 trucks and four cars are due to be replaced in FY 2012/13 and a further six trucks and three cars will be replaced in FY 2013/14. Facility Needs SunLine was awared FTA Section 5309 State of Good Repair funds matched with SCAQMD funds to replace existing and add new solar panels at the Thousand Palms operating base. The existing panels are old and outdated. Ground breaking has occurred for the new Administration Building at SunLine's Thousand Palms site. A study will also be completed in FY 2013/14 to determine the future plan for the agency's satellite operating and maintenance facility at Indio. 28 CED �M=E lier�� imotr haapsidium {ummbsim Table 2 -- SunLine Transit Agency -- SR' TP Sewn"ce Summary FY 2013 f 14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/ 11 Audited FY 2011 f 12 Audited FY 2012 f 13 Wan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr&NIA FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 71 81 Financial Data Total Cperatirg Expenses V 1,652,880 V 1,938,408 V2,276,993 $16,988,299 $24,950,824 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $4,293,489 $4,064,666 $3,987,354 $3,828,026 $4,476,300 Net Operating Expenses (Subsides) $17,359,391 $17,873,743 $18,289,639 $13,160,273 $20,474,524 Operating Characteristics Unlirked Passenger Trips 4,155,480 4,561,637 4,636,918 3,534,838 5,190,418 Passenger Miles 24,037,742 30,475,670 30,957,071 23,640,075 34,635,600 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 240,778.2 246,512.7 250,371.0 188,822.6 273,442.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue riles (b) 3,228,900.0 3,349,082.3 3,424,636.0 2,628,498.1 3,893,948.0 Total Actual Vehicle MI es 3,549,956.7 3,693,898.1 3,776,168.0 2,873,535.2 4,261,726.0 Performance Characteristics T Cperating Cast per Revenue Hcur $89.93 $89.00 $88.98 $89.97 $91.25 Farebax Recovery Ratio 19.83% 18.53% 17.89 22 .53% 17.94 Subsidy per Passenger $4.18 $3.92 $3.94 $3.72 $3.94 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.72 $0.59 $0.59 $0.56 $0.59 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $72.10 $72.51 $73.05 $69.70 $74.88 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $5.38 $5.34 $5.34 $5.01 $5.26 Passenger per Revenue Hcur (a) 17.3 18.5 18.5 18.7 19.0 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.29 1.36 1.35 1.34 1.33 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles For Rail Mcdes. CED �M=E lier�� imotr hunpsidim {umoicsin Table 2 -- SunLine Transit Agency -- St? TP Service Summary FY 2013 f 14 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2010/ 11 Audited FY 2011 f 12 Audited FY 2012 f 13 Wan FY 201 / 13 3rd Qtr&NIA FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 67 76 Financial Data Total Cperatirg Expenses $20,793,532 $20,885,284 $20,936,343 $16,041,727 $23,518,533 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $4,192,549 $3,941,399 $3,743,047 $3,692,521 $4,240,612 Net Operating Expenses (Subsides) $16,600,983 $16,943,885 $17,193,296 $12,349,207 $19,277,921 Operating Characteristics Un✓irked Passenger Trips 4,049,641 4,413,026 4,469,193 3,401,976 5,046,568 Passenger Miles 23,441,620 29,501,650 29,858,473 22,768,037 33,693,382 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 231,733.4 235,348.0 236,925.0 179,093.8 264,896.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue riles (b) 3,124,976.1 3,220,532.5 3,239,959.0 2,489,096.0 3,687,467.0 Total Actual Vehicle MI es 3,428,780.4 3,545,134.7 3,563,258.0 2,713,761.7 4,034,954.0 Performance Characteristics T Cperating Cast per Revenue Hcur $89.73 $88.74 $88.37 $89.57 $88.78 Farebax Recovery Ratio 20.16% 18.87% 17.87 23 .02% 18.03 Subsidy per Passenger $4.10 $3.84 $3.85 $3.63 $3.82 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.71 $0.57 $0.58 $0.54 $0.57 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $71.64 $72.00 $72.57 $68.95 $72.78 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $5.31 $5.26 $5.31 $4.96 $5.23 Passenger per Revenue Hcur (a) 17.5 18.8 18.9 19.0 19.1 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.30 1.37 1.38 1.37 1.37 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles For Rail Mcdes. CED �M=E lier�� imotr haapsidium {ummbsim Table 2 -- SunLine Transit Agency -- SR' TP Sewn"ce Summary FY 2013 f 14 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2010/ 11 Audited FY 2011 f 12 Audited FY 2012 f 13 Wan FY 201 / 13 3rd Qtr&NIA FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 4 5 Financial Data Total Operatirg Expenses $859,348 $1,053,124 $1,340,650 $946,571 $1,432,291 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $100,939 $123,266 $244,307 $135,505 $235,688 Net Operating Expenses (Subsides) $758,408 $929,858 $1,096,342 $811,066 $1,196,603 Operating Characteristics Unlirked Passenger Trips 105,839 148,611 167,725 132,862 143,850 Passenger Miles 596,122 974,021 1,098,598 872,038 942,218 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 9,044.8 11,164.7 13,446.0 9,728.8 8,546.0 Tctal Actual Vehicle Revenue riles (b) 103,923.9 128,549.8 184,677.0 139,402.1 206,481.0 Total Actual Vehicle MI es 121,176.3 149,763.4 212,910.0 159,773.5 226,772.0 Performance Characteristics T Operating Cast per Revenue Hcur $95.01 $94.33 $99.71 $97.30 $167.60 Farebax Recovery Ratio 11.75% 11.70% 18.22% 14.32% 16.45 Subsidy per Passenger $i .17 $6.26 $6.54 $6.10 $8.32 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.27 $0.95 $1.00 $0.93 $1.27 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $83.85 $83.29 $81.54 $83.37 $140.02 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $7.30 $7.23 $5.94 $5.82 $5.80 Passenger per Revenue Hcur (a) 11.7 13.3 12.5 13.7 16.8 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.02 1.16 0.91 0.95 0.70 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles For Rail Mcdes. CED �M=E lier�� imotr haapsidium {ummbsim Table 2 -- &inLine BLIS -- SR' TP Sewn"ce Summary FY 2013 f 14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/ 11 Audited FY 2011 f 12 Audited FY 2012 f 13 Wan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr&NIA FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 45 55 Financial Data Total Operatirg Expenses $17,816,114 $17,976,470 $17,862,985 $13,933,006 $20,482,094 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $3,882,023 $3,693,504 $3,293,882 $3,464,230 $3,774,231 Net Operating Expenses (Subsides) $13,934,091 $14,282,966 $14,569,103 $10,468,776 $16,707,863 Operating Characteristics Unlirked Passenger Trips 4,045,018 4,436,917 4,513,705 3,434,239 5,056,028 Passenger Miles 22,760,394 29,067,479 29,564,759 22,506,609 33,116,998 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 188,684.5 190,727.7 194,665.0 143,508.4 212,419.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Piles (b) 2,522,185.9 2,527,678.1 2,602,445.0 1,929,084.9 2,952,072.0 Total Actual Vehicle Piles 2,754,861.4 2,755,928.9 2,836,833.0 2,116,970.2 3,242,885.0 Performance Characteristics T Operating Cast per Revenue Hcur $94.42 $94.25 $91.76 $97.09 $96.42 Farebax Recovery Ratio 21.79% 20.55% 18.43% 24.86% 18.42 Subsidy per Passenger $3.44 $3.22 $3.23 $3.05 $3.30 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.61 $0.49 $0.49 $0.47 $0.50 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $73.85 $74.89 $74.84 $72.95 $78.66 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $5.52 $5.65 $5.60 $5.43 $5.66 Passenger per Revenue Hcur (a) 21.4 23.3 23.2 23.9 23.8 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.60 1.76 1.73 1.78 1.71 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles For Rail Mcdes. CED �M=E lier�� imotr haapsidium {ummbsim Table 2 -- S Line-DAR -- St? TP Service Summary FY 2013 f 14 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2010/ 11 Audited FY 2011 f 12 Audited FY 2012 f 13 Wan FY 2012/ 13 3rd Qtr&NIA FY 2013/ 14 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 26 26 Financial Data Total Operatirg Expenses $3,836,766 $3,961,938 $4,414,008 $3,055,293 $4,468,730 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $411,466 $371,161 $693,473 $363,796 $702,070 Net Operating Expenses (Subsides) $3,425,300 $3,590,777 $3,720,536 $2,691,497 $3,766,660 Operating Characteristics unlirked Passenger Trips 110,462 124,720 123,213 100,599 134,390 Passenger Miles 1,277,347 1,408,192 1,392,312 1,133,466 1,518,602 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 52,093.7 55,785.0 55,706.0 45,314.2 61,023.0 Tctal Actual Vehicle Revenue riles (b) 706,714.1 821,404.2 822,191.0 699,413.2 941,876.0 Total Actual Vehicle Mies 795,095.3 937,969.2 939,335.0 756,565.0 1,018,841.0 Performance Characteristics T Operating Cast per Revenue Hcur $73.65 $71.02 $79.24 $67.42 $73,23 Farebax Recovery Ratio 10.72% 9.37% 15.71% 11.91% 15.71 Subsidy per Passenger $31.01 $28.79 $30.20 $26.75 $28,03 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.68 $2.55 $2.67 $2.37 $2.48 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $65.75 $64.37 $66.79 $59.40 $61.73 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.85 $4.37 $4.53 $3.85 $4.00 Passenger per Revenue Hcur (a) 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles For Rail Mcdes. CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes SunLine currently operates 12 fixed route transit services, and one Commuter Link service, mostly covering the urbanized area of the Coachella Valley, serving SunLine's nine member cities (Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage) as well as the unincorporated communities of Bermuda Dunes, Mecca, Oasis, Thermal and Thousand Palms. In FY 2011/12, SunLine served over 4.5 million passengers system -wide, with 4.4million boardings recorded on fixed route buses, and almost 125,000 rides by ADA paratransit clients. FY 2012/13 ridership is on target to be around 3 percent higher than the FY 2011/12 ridership. Demand, while still increasing, is increasing more slowly than in FY 2011/12. Proposed service improvements in FY 2013/14 will be helpful in increasing the growth in ridership. 3.2 Recommended Short Term Service Improvements For FY 2013/14, the Agency intends to introduce two new routes and modify a number of existing routes. Details are summarized below. New Line 95 North Shore to Indio SunLine has secured funding to introduce a new transit service (Line 95) between North Shore, Mecca, Thermal, Coachella, and Indio. It is funded in part by a federal grant under the Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) Section 5316 program. The proposed route is shown below. Five trips each direction weekdays are proposed to be operated. The service will be a deviated fixed route in North Shore (in place of separate ADA service). W 3 SunLine's Indio Facility HWV 111 yQ O AVE 50 INDIO 1� ,kCOACHELLA a T = per THERMAL a AIRPORT BLVD VIA AVE 7P BR,4VA 4 5 a /HARBOR �r 4-1 4 PLEASANT .pF viEw 1 NORTH SHORE 9� AV £ 62 Z JO MECCA 5'ST ,HQME AVE 66 Hq3/41Oho NORTH SHORE 34 New Line 54 Indio to Palm Desert There is new funding available to introduce a new transit service between Indio and Palm Desert via Fred Waring Drive (see map below). There is federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funding allocated for one year of operation of this route (Line 54). This line would operate every 30 minutes weekdays daytime. It provides service to areas along the route as well as providing a faster trip between Indio and Palm Desert compared to Line 111. } I— W O cc Z O C F M A— ▪ '▪ 9- 1j PALM DESERT Y o o U WASHINGTON FRED WARING INDIAN WELLS O LA QUINTA JEFFERSON HOOVER INDIO /4/ SunLine's Indio Facility Other Changes: Funding levels available for subsidizing transit operations are improving, meaning sufficient operating funding is available in FY 2013/14 to support the following service improvements: • Line 14: Desert Hot Springs — Palm Springs O 20 minute instead of 35 minute weekday peak service headways O 30 minute weekday midday and weeknight service headways O 40 minute instead of 45 minute weekend service headways O Implement January 2014 • Line 15: Desert Hot Springs O 40 minute instead of 45 minute service weekdays and weekends O Revised span of service 6 a.m. — 8 p.m. weekdays and 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. weekends O Implement January 2014 • Line 24: Palm Springs O Revised terminus loop at South Palm Springs O 40 minute instead of 45 minute service weekdays O 60 minute instead of 45 minute service weekends O Last trips approximately 7 p.m. each night O Implement September 2013 35 " L i n e 3 0 : C a t h e d r a l C i t y P a l m S p r i n g s O 2 0 m i n u t e i n s t e a d o f 3 0 m i n u t e w e e k d a y d a y t i m e s e r v i c e h e a d w a y s O I m p l e m e n t S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 3 " L i n e 3 2 : P a l m S p r i n g s , C a t h e d r a l C i t y , T h o u s a n d P a l m s , R a n c h o M i r a g e , P a l m D e s e r t \ O 6 0 m i n u t e i n s t e a d o f 7 5 m i n u t e w e e k e n d s O I m p l e m e n t S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 3 " L i n e 5 3 : O R e s t r u c t u r e o f r o u t e a l i g n m e n t O R e v i s e d s p a n s o f s e r v i c e w e e k d a y s 6 a m 7 p m a n d w e e k e n d s 9 a m 6 p m " L i n e 7 0 : L a Q u i n t a O N o c h a n g e s . " L i n e 9 0 : I n d i o - C o a c h e l l a O 6 0 m i n u t e i n s t e a d o f 3 5 m i n u t e w e e k n i g h t a n d w e e k e n d s e r v i c e h e a d w a y O R e v i s e d r o u t e t o b e t t e r s e r v e s o u t h w e s t C o a c h e l l a ( M a y 2 0 1 4 ) O I m p l e m e n t J a n u a r y 2 0 1 4 " L i n e 9 1 : I n d i o C o a c h e l l a T h e r m a l M e c c a O a s i s O R e v i s e d r o u t e a t O a s i s t o s e r v e M o u n t a i n V i e w E s t a t e ( i m p l e m e n t S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 3 ) O R e v i s e d r o u t e i n C o a c h e l l a ( a s s o c i a t e d w i t h L i n e 9 0 c h a n g e i m p l e m e n t J a n u a r y 2 0 1 4 ) O I m p r o v e w e e k e n d f r e q u e n c y f r o m 8 0 t o 6 0 m i n u t e s e r v i c e ( i n c o n j u c t i o n w i t h c h a n g e t o L i n e 9 0 , i m p l e m e n t J a n u a r y 2 0 1 4 ) . " L i n e 1 1 1 : P a l m S p r i n g s I n d i o O 2 0 m i n u t e i n s t e a d o f 4 0 m i n u t e w e e k e n d h e a d w a y 9 a . m . t o 6 p . m . ( i m p l e m e n t S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 3 ) O E x t e n d s e r v i c e t o C o a c h e l l a ( i m p l e m e n t M a y 2 0 1 4 ) " M a j o r P u b l i c H o l i d a y s : O S u n L i n e i s p l a n n i n g t o o p e r a t e w e e k e n d s c h e d u l e s y s t e m w i d e o n M e m o r i a l D a y , J u l y 4 t h , L a b o r D a y , a n d N e w Y e a r s D a y ( i m p l e m e n t e f f e c t i v e L a b o r D a y S e p t e m b e r 2 , 2 0 1 3 ) , c o n s i s t e n t w i t h r i d e r s h i p c a r r i e d o n t h o s e d a y s . U n m e t N e e d s S u n L i n e i s s t u d y i n g p o t e n t i a l f u n d i n g f o r s e r v i c e o p t i o n s f o r t h e c o m m u n i t i e s o f N o r t h I n d i o a n d D e s e r t E d g e / S k y V a l l e y . T h e s e s t u d i e s a r e o n g o i n g a n d m a y r e s u l t i n n e w s e r v i c e i n i t i a t i v e s t o b e i n c l u d e d f o r f u n d i n g i n s u b s e q u e n t S R T P y e a r s . 3 6 3.3 Longer Term Service Modifications and Adjustments In light of ongoing challenges with operating funding, staff plans to continue evaluating existing services for further modifications for approval by the Board of Directors, as set out in section 3.2 above. SunLine will also continue to use the PIP measurements and a proposed new set of Service Standards as guidelines to improve service efficiency and effectiveness. It is also important that SunLine continue investigating longer term options to provide 15 minute service on key routes such as Lines 30 and 111, as well as 30 minute service or better where warranted on SunLine's other local transit lines. These improvements require significant additional new operating funding and and an expanded fleet, which will take a number of years to plan for. 3.4 Marketing Plans and Promotion SunLine plans to promote and market existing service, service improvements, and new routes proposed to be implemented in FY 2013/14. The marketing plan will entail conducting more public outreach to businesses and schools along the routes, as well as advertise service in bus shelters, on the buses and on our website promoting the Google Transit and Bus Tracker applications. 37 3.5 Budget Impacts on Proposed Change In FY 2013/14, SunLine plans to introduce two new routes and many improvements to existing routes. Based on the proposal for phasing in these improvements, the operating budget impact is approximately $1,000,000 per year in this first year and $1,500,000 in subsequent years. This first year will be funded by an estimated $200,000 in extra fare revenue, an average of $200,000 in new grant funding (JARC, CMAQ) and approximately $600,000 in additional local and state transit funding. TABLE 3A - INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Line # Route Class Route Description / Cities Served Line 14 Regional Serves the Cities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs Line 15 Local Serves the Community of Desert Hot Springs Line 24 Local Serves the City of Palm Springs Line 30 Regional Serves the Cities of Palm Springs and Cathedral City Line 32 Local Serves the Cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and Community of Thousand Palms Line 53 Local Serves the City of Palm Desert Line 70 Local Serves the Cities of La Quinta, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and Community of Bermuda Dunes Lines 80-81 Local Serve the City of Indio Line 90 Local Serves the Cities of Indio and Coachella Line 91 Local Serves the Cities of Coachella and Indio, and the Communities of Mecca, Thermal and Oasis. Line 111 Regional Serves the Cities of Indio, La Quinta, Indian Wells, Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Line 220 Commuter Link New Commuter Express service serving Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms, Cabazon (Morongo Casino), Banning, Beaumont, Moreno Valley, and Riverside Proposed New Routes Line 54 Local Will serve the Cities of Indio, La Quinta, Indian Wells, Palm Desert and the Community of Bermuda Dunes Line 95 Local Will serve the Communities of North Shore, Mecca, Thermal, and the Cities of Coachella, and Indio. 38 TABLE 3B - FY 2013/14 NEW/EXISTING ROUTES EXEMPTION SHEET ROUTE # MODE SERVICE TYPE ROUTE DESCRIPTION DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION ROUTE EXEMPTION END DATE Line 220 Fixed Route Directly Operated Palm Desert — Riverside Commuter Link September 2012 August 2015 Line 95 Deviated Fixed Route Directly Operated North Shore - Indio September 2013 Aug ust 2016 Line 54 Fixed Route Directly Operated Indio — Palm Desert January 2014 December 2016 39 425`4C4'OZ$ OOE'9C4'4$ 428`056'42$ 0'92(192`4 O'846'E68'E 0'09 C`882 0'244`EC2 009`SE9`4E 8 TV' 06T'S T8 she{ol aaplRoad a31RaaS 099`99L`E$ 5SS`94 E$ 0 L4`699`It L4E`L4 96C`E62$ 8I6`ST E$ 066`OSf$ OL9`68E$ SOE`E94$ S E8`T 5S` T$ b05`b84`It E 81`41 8LE`09b$ S28`S9 E$ PH` ZTO` Z$ 460`180' 5$ 0 f0`20L$ 886`29$ S 8T `462$ C E8'98T$ 6CI 69$ 086`8C$ 2 f4`LLT$ 8TV L6$ 146` 603 2 62` 65 E$ 92T`TLE$ 969`E6T$ E8Z`SL$ 9 54` 16$ Z 8T`68a 86T'LI2'T$ 0 EL`894`b$ 245`6014 4 S9`E96`It E8I`4E6$ S L6`29 E$ 868`46E$ 194`826$ 880`Zat L42`Ef S$ 12T`TT6`T$ 0E9`558`3 814`896$ 199`SES$ Z 82`LSb$ 5 LS`I04`2$ 262`862'4$ 0'T48`8'01 0'9L8146 0'26 E`S9 0'E2019 209`8T S`I 0'248949 0'SE0`45 Cr OS E`E 0'4E VC SL8`2T2 0'T06`0IC 0'42S`E62 0'S98`SI 0'48 E`SI T69`784`I 0'L06'L4T 0'S0214T II E9 81 I 0'08911 EI6`6291 0'694`LS 0'ZS''45 O'SOS`S 0'4I VS L40`6SC 0'E2 S`29 0'2T 2`65 0'02 S`S 0'62VS 400`E26 0'T00`L4T 0'f261 ET 0'6f E`0I 0'4E8`6 L9f`999`I 0'02T`LL 0'f96`9L O'OfTE 0'4S 0`E 524`2T9 O'T9f`06 0'62218 0'29 S`S 0'6LI`5 ES6`244 0'S85`2 OE 0'126`912 0' ant 0'152`LT L25`2961 0'861`E 62 0'90E`8S2 0'6Z L`82 0'99V/2 bOT`8S SrS 0. LE E`E ST 0'128`6ET 0'296`0T 0'T92`0T 6E5`6251 0'018`48 0'61b`SL 0106`2 0'8S E`Z 816`9TT 0'00b`2L 0'ES2`29 0198`5 0'LZ S`S 42b`02L 0'9E 2`08E 0'29L`EEE 0'808`32 0'E0 VS2 0E2`9S L`E 0'S6 T'C 66 0'292'ET6 0'195`89 0'6E5'59 T85`T4LII 06E`4ET 92 0 OS`2E T Of9`922 248' 842 S 88`SIT T LT6`04T T 894`452 005`E6 929`Z9 2 29` 662 5 9S` Sb 8 LTS`EE2 4 0 S8`LT Z 886`601 S OZVELS 1 809'26L1 ST le P1 11do-fJ15 le P1 S64.15 le P1 I64.15 le 1.1 0 6-IJ15 le lol T8-115 le 10l 08-115 le P1 0 f-1.115 le P1 4 S4115 le P1 ES-N15 le pi 2E MS le pi 0E MS le pi 42-1-a15 le pi O22-1,115 le pi 5T-MS le pi T-MS le 1.1 TTT-115 Rp!sq ns {aN annexed {so3 aa6 uassed 6m{eaado salyJ rem saiu anuaxaa snot{ sanoF{ saim �e{ol anuaRaa aa6 uassed saa6uassed sepiyah lead adRl Rea # a{noa slua6uaj3 plea sagna8 IIV bi{ETCE AA 8 -- A3ua6V psueal aunung .31,1sgelS alnob' d1 tfS - £ a19e1 ---+P MM. 3.1.0d EE'I 0'6T 92'5$ 88'41$ 65'0$ 46'E$ 9646'LT T8'4$ 14'9$ 52'I6$ geiol aappwad 031.n.aas 4I'0 2'2 00'4$ ELT 3$ 84'2$ 09'0 tr'OT I4'9$ 85'0TT$ E9'T$ 11'0 C4T 69'5$ 25'80T$ 2I'T$ 9CI E'TZ 62'S$ 66'E9$ 94'0$ 11'2 4'12 24'5$ Z2'45$ 6E'0$ 8E'2 0'92 4E'S$ 6I'85$ 4E'0$ E6'I 6'52 69'5$ fE'9e$ 54'0$ T21 9'0E 90'5$ 65'12T$ 49'0$ E8'0 T'ET 01'S$ 94'68$ 50'T$ 801 tr'ZT 09'5$ 26'68$ 6f'O$ 62'E 2'TE 5f'S$ 59'45$ 12'0$ f9'T 8'22 45'5$ TS'SZI TS'0$ 42'0 9'Z 01'9$ b2'563 1,6'E$ ZCT 6'6I 88'S$ 6I'99$ IS'0$ WI 8'22 50'9$ S8'61$ bS'0$ 96'I 4'a 95'S$ ES'LL$ E4'O$ EO'82$ 96I CST 52'EE$ 4Ltr$ E2'E1$ le P1 'deCFM5 99'0I$ 961CST 09'2T$ 85'1$ 89'0ET$ le P1 564115 LE'f$ 96861•I 99'8$ 69'9$ 49'L2T$ le P1 I6-N15 00'E$ 9666'61 SCE$ 29'9$ 86'6L$ lelol 06-M5 45'2$ 9650'6T EI'E$ 0C9$ 40'L9$ le l°l T8-N15 tr2'2$ 9600'02 08'2$ L9'9$ 4C2L$ le l°l 08-N15 56'2$ 96I T'6T 59'E$ 40'1$ I4'46$ le P1 0f-M5 LT'4$ 9600'02 T2'5$ EE'9$ 64'65T$ le P1 454115 58'9$ 961 T'6T 84'8$ 90'1$ 69'013 le P1 E5-N15 8T'S$ 966C8T 8E'9$ 06'9$ 5f'OT T$ le pi 2E-M5 Sr T$ 9600'02 61'2$ 8T'1$ TE'89$ le pi 0E MS 2E'a 9600'02 ST'4$ E6'9$ 8E'46$ le I°l 42-MS 6L'S2$ 96S 0'bI I0'0E$ OVA LI'L22$ ler' 022-MS EE'E$ 9600'02 9I'17.$ SCA te28$ ler' ST-MS I S'E$ 9602'9I 6I'b$ OVA 6Z'SE$ ler' bI-MS E8.2$ 962E'6T TS'E$ 06'9$ 01'96$ lel°l TTT-115 apW aad anol-1 aad al!W saa6uassed saa6uassed anuanaa aad Rplsgns anol-1 anuanaa aad Rplsgng al!W aa6uassed aad Rppgns aa6uassed oged 'Rd Rplsq ns Raanoa s ogaae j aa6uassed aim anuanaa anol-1 anuaeag lad iso3 ,lad Tso3 lad iso3 6uneaadn buneaadp adki Req # ainod saoaeolpuI aouewaoiaad sagnob IIV bi{ETCE AA 8 -- A3ua6V psueal aunung .31,1sgelS alnobr d1 tfS - £ a19e1 �MM. 3.1.0d CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget For FY 2013/14, SunLine plans to use funding from various sources to operate its fixed route and paratransit services, including using Section 5307 funds apportioned by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for operating assistance, preventative maintenance, and transit capital projects. Other funding sources will include Proposition 1 B transit safety and security funds, State Transit Assistance (STA) funds, Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Measure A local funding, FTA Section 5311 rural operating assistance funding, Section 5316 JARC grants, and Section 5317 New Freedom grants. Other funding includes revenue from SunLine's Bus and Shelter Advertising and a contribution from Riverside Transit Agency towards the operating costs for the Palm Desert to Riverside Commuter Express service. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program For FY 2013/14, the funding plan to support proposed operating and capital program will entail new funding requested and estimated carryover funds from prior years. The funding plan for operating assistance uses new LTF, Measure A, FY 2013 Section 5307 Operating Assistance and Preventative Maintenance funding, Section 5311 Rural Operating Assistance, Section 5316 JARC and Section 5317 New Freedom grants as well as other revenue (advertising, RTA subsidy) and revenue generated from passenger fares. The funding plan for capital improvement projects will comprise of new funding from FTA Section 5307 funds, State Prop 1 B Security and STA funds. The funding plans to support the proposed operating and capital program are outlined below. 4.2.1 Operating Budget: The estimated operating budget of $24,950,824, outlined in Table 4, is funded from various sources that include: • Estimated new Local Transportation funds (LTF) totaling $10,768,614 • Estimated Measure A funds totaling $5,217,000 • Estimated Section 5311 funding of $420,188 • Estimated carryover Section 5307 funds for operating assistance and Preventive Maintenance in the amounts of $924,804 and $1,800,000 respectively plus carryover CMAQ funding of $77,464. • Allocated Section 5316 JARC and Section 5317 New Freedom funds of $100,030 and $25,000 respectively for the Riverside Commuter Link 220 service, JARC Section 5316 funds of $108,635 for the new North Shore transit service, and $21,000 in Section 5317 funds for the Taxi Voucher Program in the Coachella Valley. • Other revenues from: o $500,000 outside fuel sales, plus $300,000 fuel rebate. o $60,000 for bus stop maintenance contracts with two cities o $60,000 for Riverside Transit Agency funding of Commuter Link 220 service o $18,089 of Taxi voucher sales • A total of $3,550,000 in revenue is estimated to be collected in passenger fares 42 4.2.2 Capital Improvement Program budget: The estimated FY 2013/14 capital improvement program is a budget of $7,982,870, including estimated carryover funds of $578,721 as shown in Table 4, and includes funding from the following sources: • $4,896,315 estimated in new State Transit Assistance (STA) funds, plus carryover STA of $135,135. • Estimated new Section 5307 capital assistance funds in the amount of $2,135,964, plus carryover Section 5307 funds of $443,586. • Estimated amount of $371,870 in Prop 1 B Transit Security funding to be used in funding transit safety and security enhancement projects. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Americans with Disability Act (ADA) SunLine complies with ADA Regulations with accessible vehicles used for transit services and ADA paratransit vans. Supervisor vans are also equipped with wheelchair lifts. The agency continues to work with local jurisdictions to continue to increase the number of accessible bus stops in full compliance with ADA guidelines. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) In FY 2010/11, staff submitted its bi-annual DBE report to Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Staff is working on gathering information to develop and submit its DBE report to the Federal Transit Administration in FY 2012/13. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) SunLine complies with federal regulations pertaining to employment and submits its EEO Report every other year to the Federal Transit Administration. A report was submitted in 2011. Title VI SunLine's Title VI Report was updated and submitted to the FTA for the three-year required mandate for updating the report. The Board approved the FY 2010/11 Updated Report which has been approved by the FTA. A new report is due to FTA by November 30, 2013. Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Audit In FY 2009/10, RCTC commissioned Mayer, Hoffman and McCann PC to conduct the Triennial Performance Audit as required by TDA, with no findings resulting from this audit. The next audit is due in FY 2012/13 and will be performed by Pacific Management Consulting. Federal Transit Administration Triennial Audit Staff completed the FTA FY 2010 Triennial Audit in June 2010. All recommendations and findings have been addressed and approved by FTA. The next audit is due in 2013. National Transit Database (NTD) Report and Sampling Staff completed NTD Section sampling in mid 2011. Next sampling will be required in FY 2013/14. SunLine is planning to run parallel sampling using manual samples and Automatic Passenger Counter (APC) data in order to gain approval to use APC data in future reporting. Alternative Fueled Vehicles SunLine conforms to RCTC Alternative Fuel Policy with all vehicles in the fleet using CNG fuels. The current fleet consists of 56 40-foot CNG buses, 3 40-foot Hydrogen Fuel Cell buses, ten 32-foot CNG buses, 31 22-foot paratransit buses, and 38 non -revenue CNG or electric vehicles. 43 4ze'9se'4z E Iowa soox 000'LL S 40.0 SOW 000'SZ S I0w9 89Lx 050'004 S 9tnoltldV Woo9 61O8 of laa(1ne SE9101. S 6LS4Z01.3 O13b SS l'OL4 S iuetl OVW'd Pue EL246LAd 44n1.A.405O 145L'L09i $ snoAuea SCZ'CL9S s1 et9el!ene 05IV-5451ZO'453 3l0b 000'L4Z'S S I s alpnon v6)6805 L$:uoiln4nsuoa OZZ VlN 000'095'a WO ueiu!sw ma 4..19 900'095 'a1e9e61OND OO6'0055'sales POsPlslna 000'005S P61.)19.6 "ePMau1 flOVOSS S troid£4'Z LAd enuanaepr4ae,g181406}sPrewanwdUJI.N-essma*Is mi. A'. anwnel roge)e; papalad 84111O4 s!.9.. omj 000'055'E S Le L5lZ0 l"3 alOb 419'69/11 S 6upun; Ob'W7,enoA„so). S9ti1LS soMPul -. spunj wopaa.j roaN 1150 41.9Z wBJBad.ayonoAlxel OZZ Hurl aalnwuro3 sol5Punj jN lloO 1.1.0Z NISI83 OZ64u!l lalnwl-o. ,o; spunj OaVPIIE3 LLOL 8415!Kj SPOOS 01045 4poN ON'df 6 Ll£ LOZ Aj PePuaw000aH spunj BugondO 4 4£S 00P0S 4IR Aj 981000k! spunBuno.Ion0 LOOS u0116a5 4NO4Aj PaloaiOLd spulgtl amseain 4U£LAj P8l0aioad SPund 1a41O 4L!£LAd Palooio-b anuanaa xownej 414£L/.9 paloaioaj Jll lb Lli4 Aj P910aio.d saiSpnd pain sne4a0 Bunau nj pasodoid owinSS'CS 0801£65 090'99S SeB`SBZS 66L'0LPS 6S 1•11,ES InieS£L'ZS po0'L1.21$ uS 0L6'LLCS S£LISC LS SLC'S86'4S OS 61.91121.13 8809U1S 1017S1'6ZS 4B9'Ed8'ZCS 1.11,1.U-so.. ado 1e101 OS OS OS OS OS 9SS'E9pS 996'SEL`z$ oS OS OLB LLCS SCL'SC LS SLC'969'41 OS oS LZL'BLSS B9L'SO9'LS OLS'ZSS'GS inudea ;IelolgnS ODA9Z5 000'0595 OS O00'o09S 000'OOBS FL-41.15 1...PA5 loawsasueW .....alums-11 00004ZS 000'0EE OS 00000ES 00000ES 01-41-15 gam .10 g swum ae.goal-S11 O66'00Z5 000'09S OS 06099ZS 00099ZS 60-14p15 suer lS 4 sesnq 89 91 do.18-189 ppp 0085655 00VSOS OS 00019695 00019694 90-41-18 (don 4.86,68908i SAID C.1,1,99) salol4aAa,guas MaN 9 Wawsoelday 000'OOL ZS OS 0005OL ZS 000'COL'Z$ LO-64'15 .9.4d Puesnonl .)......0 Pue APrµS u.pe15 01.41.nd 9NS.48..N 000104ZS 000-'09S OS 0001005S 0001O1)ES 90-91.15 spebsd ll 0000Z LS 000'0ES OS 000051E 00005)S SO-4L-15 5uro0a4s4111 f41. l 04)669.959il 9n)).).al copal 000'06$ OS 060'00S 000'00S 401.1'15 (sopelop 13 OL1 rynnnCI walnoS a,ewr.6. OS 98S1E$ 9LOSILS OL6'iKS SE111$ 999'SC$ IZZaISI 69L'C69$ ON'IESS EO-41-1s ati.O9 dos MEW 4(wallas. snq 95) )89)9669855.cl 000'062S 0001964 000'09S 000'14Z$ OOOOZCS 00010ZL4 0001104S ZO-61'15 susn1oeweae0.11.ue4e,ad6 000591S 09L'SZ93 000ZP5 05Z'9BZ'LS 000OIZS 000'SIL'LS 000'SZfi LS 10-91-1S Isuss'oomon. sel.onsissisna21 sn9 s.ga,rd ab an. . LO.0 MS uolmaS 94E5 L1o9aoS ILES u.p..s S6WIAS wlyd Ala lap.mampul LOES u.paag ,ena uea SB1.1ud3 Fled Ala la'Po41aaloInul LOSS u.5495 y....91 SaSIYLLd BL dad Aa,oS sls nag El I. doad PIS 66now90 sus dll ismakorO 411 lunowV lan.A,.a Rol ,e.nWeO po4NM spunj to 'noway 1.p1 ,enM„eO 41Wl sound.. snl0ulq 1..1 ,equnN laai.Ad 104o3 1V11dV] 0004:155'ES 6901BE6S D001969 599'903 99 L'OZOS 69Z'Z09`L$ OS 000'LTSS OS OS 0$ 6)9'894')LS 89L'ZOSi$ 959ab Cza 9Le191.,Z$ 9nno-n46 'lelnlgnS 994'LL8'4S OS OS 696`LL8'15 OS WOLLO'LS 0a11eua11.11¢1A1.0uare,d 000'09113 0998S6E 900'8l's S88'eOZS e81`OZ4E 408'9ZOS 00011e5S OS 419`89L'L IS L08129$ 86.1841'ZZS OBE'SLO'SZS ....Ms.s+&In. * ONLL7113dO sogale9 ....NJ ,r0O 1LSS unipaS 91ES non.IS IIS; n.9aeS ,snuuds Fled AIa pp...vamp.' LOES u'4asS IpADAl.a "Sands wind A!O le'Pa41ea,'.!WI LOSS InWe5 ysnrsseW V351 wad 81 dad Armes 1,.s0e1 8 L dad V15 ,a:nRueO V15 dll ,an.A„ea dll sunourp iseMuea 1nlo1 ....Ad.") Lnoaa,M spunj;n pnowV Om! ,4) ano,e Lam 5Pun.1 is Inn.wy Irwl uondnase0 pafo,d CLOZ'SL AaW 1iY210 uold.Pori aaurd ORS' pa 984089 spunj;o 898.unS 6UEL0Z Ad £L9L9O 1dn'UO OLII Hl 4Lf£1.0L Ad l94;san ball 6u!Punj;o Ale4.4,40 nS - P aln el TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-01 PROJECT NAME Bus Rehabilitation PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funding would enable SunLine to rehabilitate 35 older buses in its fleet, providing their engines and transmisions a mid-life overhaul as well as replacing all seat covers and faded decals on these buses, as well as purchase other equipment to repair or rehabilitate buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Currently, there are thirty five (35) buses in the SunLine fixed route fleet that are approaching or have reached six years age and 250,000-300,000 miles of operation, and are due for an overhaul of their engines and transmissions to ensure they operate reliably to their minimum 12-year or 500,000 mile life. The opportunity will also be taken to replace all seat covers and any faded decals and other visual body defects on these buses. Part or all of this work is proposed to be conducted by outside contractor(s). PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 STA TOTAL $428,750 $1,286,250 $1,715,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance CA-90-Y876 SL11-01 Bus Rehabilitation $8,0000 CA-90-Y964 SL12-01 Bus Rehabilitation $160,000 STA SL11-01/12-01 Bus Rehabilitation $42,000 45 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-02 PROJECT NAME Replacement Paratransit Vans PROJECT DESCRIPTION SunLine will purchase four (4) new paratransit vans to replace four vans that have reached their minimum three year 150,000 mile life. Three of the four vehicles will be funded by carryover funding from prior years. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The project will replace four paratransit vans which have reached their three year 150,000 minimum life and become costly to maintain after reaching this age and level of operation. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $96,000 STA $24,000 TOTAL $120,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance CA 90 Y964 SL 12-02 Replacement Paratransit Vans $240,000 STA SL 12-02 Replacement Paratransit Vans $133,000 46 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-03 PROJECT NAME Transit Stop Enhancements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhance existing bus stops as recommended in the COA. Funding requested for transit enhancements will address FTA requirement to utilize 1 % of the Section 5307 apportionment on Safety and Security, as well as the one percent requirement for transit enhancements. Primary activity is the purchase and installation of thirty eight (38) new shelter sheds, including site improvements where required. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Continued improvements (primarily new shelter sheds) to bus stops for the safety and comfort of passengers as recommended in the Comprehensive Operational Analysis. The service area experiences extreme temperatures in summer months, making the shelter sheds a valuable addition to stop facilities. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $164,414 STA $36,865 Prop 1 B Security $281,870 TOTAL $483,149 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance CA-90-Y964 (incl. Carryover FTA 5316) SL12-03 $35,586 STA SL 12-03 $13,135 47 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-04 PROJECT NAME Bus Camera System Update PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funds requested in this fiscal year will enable SunLine to upgrade the camera system on ten (10) El Dorado buses in the fixed route fleet. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Project is necessary to provide upgraded camera system technology, including better storage capacity and download functionality. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES Prop 1 B Security TOTAL $90,000 $90,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 48 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-05 PROJECT NAME Indio Transit Hub Restrooms PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project will see the installation of public restrooms at the Indio Transit Hub (Highway 111/Flower Street) at which there are over 900 passenger boardings daily. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The high volume of passengers and lack of alternative restroom access warrants the provision of restrooms at this busy stop, the busiest in the SunLine network. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 STA TOTAL $120,000 $30,000 $150,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 49 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-06 PROJECT NAME Information Technology System (IT) Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase various IT equipment, software and hardware for existing agency system needs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Use of IT equipment is critical to the daily functions staff performs and helps to streamline operations and reports for SunLine services. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $240,000 STA $60,000 TOTAL $300,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 50 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-07 PROJECT NAME Study and begin construction of New CNG Fueling Station for Thousand Palms division. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The SunLine Thousand Palms CNG fueling station is approaching 20-years of operation. This is the expected lifespan of this facility. This project will see SunLine Transit Agency hire consultants with expertise in designing CNG fueling stations, to prepare a design in order to put a job out to bid for the replacement of the CNG fueling station. $200,000 has been allocated for this purpose. $2,500,000 of the overall $5,000,000 estimated cost to replace the fueling station has been allocated in this budget year. The remaining $2,500,000 will be allocated in the FY 14-15 year. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The existing CNG fueling station is reaching its intended twenty year lifespan in 2014. The cost of maintaining this facility will continue to increase as it ages further. Extending the life of the existing facility well beyond the 20 years has an increasing risk of disruption to service as major parts are far more likely to fail and be very costly to repair. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA TOTAL $2,700,000 $2,700,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 51 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-08 PROJECT NAME Purchase of replacement and expansion revenue and non -revenue vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase three (3) replacement and four (4) new (expansion) CNG relief cars and six (6) replacement service trucks that have met their useful life based on federal guidelines. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This continues SunLine's goal of replacing non -revenue vehicles in its fleet in adherence to federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of these vehicles, as well as expand the relief car fleet in response to new service expansion generating the need for more relief cars. Purchasing the replacement buses during this fiscal year ensures that SunLine continues to replace older vehicles in the fleet to comply with federal and state laws in a timely manner. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $396,800 STA $99,200 TOTAL $496,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 52 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-09 PROJECT NAME Equip SunLine revenue fleet with free Wi-Fi service. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase equipment for up to 68 buses and 31 vans to receive Wi-Fi service for passengers to be able to connect to the internet free of charge while riding SunLine bus services. The four Commuter Link 220 buses had this facility added in 2012. This project would extend the coverage to all fixed route buses and ADA paratransit vans. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The project will allow passengers on all SunLine fixed route buses and paratransit vans to connect to the internet free of charge. This is intended to make travel on SunLine more attractive by allowing passengers to make more productive use of their time while riding our services. It will also facilitate eventual conversion of the transit radio system to cellular. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $200,000 STA $50,000 TOTAL $250,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 53 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-10 PROJECT NAME New Intelligent Transportation System Modules PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is intended to expand SunLine Transit Agency use of intelligent transportation system modules. The project would see the purchase of two additional Trapeze products: Comms: This is a customer service module that allows for the recording and analysis of all customer feedback received by the agency. The existing system in FleetNet is antiquated and cannot be used for easy analysis of feedback received. Ops Web: This Trapeze module allows bus operators to log on to check many details such as their rostered work, pay details, leave balances, and other notices, without having to find a noticeboard or contact another staff person. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The requested funding will enable SunLine to provide two key new ITS modules, improving the agency's responsiveness to customer feedback, and providing easier access for bus operators to information. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $240,000 STA $60,000 TOTAL $300,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 54 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 14-11 PROJECT NAME Maintenance Management System PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase replacement maintenance management system in place of the antiquated FleetNet system in use today. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The existing maintenance management system (FleetNet) is based on an outdated IT platform and does not allow for the range of analysis required by the maintenance staff. The system will also need to communicate with a proposed new financial management system. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 STA TOTAL $250,000 $550,000 $800,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 55 0$ 0$ 0$ ZL£`LL$ S90`bS$ 0$ 0$ o$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 6EL'ZZ4$ 9L4'1,93 lealde0'86upeaado :leaol 0$ 0$ 0$ L6S16$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 668'Z$ 9617171$ Rlfde3 :lelolgns 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ L69`44$ 0$ 668'Z$ 9641h4$ Ja6euEVVA11II901N-oeno o$ o$ ZL£`LL$ eeptil 0$ 0$ o$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ o$ 048'644$ 089'6£Z$ 6upeaado :fe101gns 0$ 000 09$ 000 09$ 000 001$ RalleA ellayaeoo JOJ dlysJauped 61.11nll;uapuedepul 8917`Z17$ 8917'Z17$ 9E6'178$ s;uawwanos jo uogeloossV Aellen ellayoeoa ZLE2Z$ ZLE'LZ$ 171,L174$ saoluag ao.1 sue;ueweg uasaa oued rGanooab xogeJea anoV DVWd [ANLLLES uol;aaS fadVfl 9LES uogoes LEES u0IPOS 60£S uol;aaS s6uudSuled 44p laWau;ea oipul LO£S uouoeS vDnseah VASIWld g; doad Li;unoes ;ism' 86 doLd V1S g1N ywoh Pool spung;o ;unowV le;o1 JegwnN ;oefoad le;idea aoue;sissy 6uilDed0-uouduosea;oefoJd 171lS60Z Ad .10; panbab buipun j spafoid mine° iesnmun;o tiewwns - algel ueld ;IsueJl a61.1sa 1.104s paasanbaa spunAnwwns £1/ZI-0Z Ad A3ue6y aunung Table 5.1 - Summary of Funding Request for FY 2014115 DRAFT 061513 SunLine Transe Agency FY 2o1 aim Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan THIRD DRAFT M aq 15, 2013 Protect Description Capital Project Number(1) Total Amount of Funds Total Carryover Amount LTF Carryover LTF STA Prop 1B Transit Security Prop 13 PTMISEA Measure Section 5307 Indio/Cathedral City Carryover Section 5307 Indio/Cathedral Section 5311 Section 5316 Section 5317 Other Revenue Farebox OPERATING Operating Assistance $24,159,840 $0 $13,577,711 $0 $5,300,000 $200,000 $0 $264,566 $141,563 $26,000 $900,000 $3,750,000 Preventive Maintenance $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 Subtotal: Operating $25,959.340 $0 $13.577,711 $0 $0 $0 $5,300.000 $2.000,000 $0 $264,566 $141,563 $26,000 $900,000 $3.750,000 CAPITAL Bus Rehabilitation(31 buses) SL-15-01 $1,705,000 $852,500 $852,500 11 Paratranslt replacement vans SL-15-02 $1,210000 $242.000 $968,000 Transit Enhancement(25 shelters) SL-15-03 $400000 $32000 $240000 $128000 Canera System Upgrade (15 Orlon Buses) SL-15-04 $135.000 $135,000 New CNG Fueling Station Thousand Palms (Part 2) SL-15-05 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 IT Protects SL-15-06 $250 000 $50 000 $200 000 Maintenance Tools & Equipment SL-15-07 $100.000 $20.000 $80,000 Replacement Service Vehicles(5 cars 1SUM) SL-15-08 $212000 $42400 $169600 Subtotal: Capital $6,512000 $0 $0 $0 $3,738.900 $375,000 $0 $0 $2398,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating 8 Capital $32,471,840 $0 $13,577,711 $0 $3,738,900 $375,000 $0 $5,300,000 $4,398,100 $0 $264,566 $141,563 $26,000 $900,000 $3,750,000 Proposed Funding Details Target Budget Projected FY 14115f LTF Projected FY14/15 Farebox Revenue Projected FY14/15 Other Funds Projected FY14/15 Measure A funds Projected FY14/15 Section 5307 Operating Funds Projected FY 14/15 Section 5311 Operating Funds Recommended FY 14/15 NF Funds Recommended FY 14/15 JARC Funds Estimated Operating Funding Total FY1415 Projected FY14/15 STA Capital Protected FY14/15 5307 Capital $25959.840 (FY13-14 service lever1 02 (2 % increase) $ 13,577,711 FY 13-14: plus some unallocated carryover $ 3,750.000 FY13-14 $ 900,000 As for FY 13-14, No Fuel Rebate $ 5,300.000 As for FY13-14, plus carryover unallocated available. $ 2,000.000 As for l3-14plus carryover unallocated - $ 264,566 As Tor FY11-12 (FY12-13 had extra funds from FTA) $ 26,000 [This Includes $21.000 Taxi Voucher program funds and $5,000 for Commuter Link 220]. $ 141,563 [This Is for proposed Commuter Link 220& New North Shore Route]. $ 25,959,840 $ 4,000.000 FY 13/14 plus unallocated carryover. $ 2,512.000 FY 13/14 level and unallocated carryover also available. TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 15-01 PROJECT NAME Bus Rehabilitation PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funds requested will enable SunLine to rehabilitate an additional 31 buses that will have reached their 6-year age and 250,000 miles of operation. They will each receive and overhaul of their engine and transmission system, as well as have all seating recovered and faded decals and other visual body defects be repaired. Some or all of this work is proposed to be completed by an outside contractor(s). PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Currently, there are 31 buses that will reach their 6-year age and 250,000-300,000 miles of operation. In order to preserve these buses in excellent operating condition for their next 6- years of operation, a mid-life overhaul is proposed. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $ 852,500 STA $ 852,500 TOTAL $ 1,705,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 58 TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 15-02 ROJ ECT NAME Purchase eleven (11) replacement paratransit vans PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase eleven (11) replacement CNG vans to replace existing paratransit vans in the SunDial fleet that have met their useful life based on federal guidelines. In 2012, thirteen new buses were purchased and the majority of these vehicles will have operated mileage of over 150,000 miles and 3 years of service. The agency will replace eleven vans each year. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This continues SunLine's goal of replacing vans in its fleet. As a result of eleven (11) of the current SunDial paratransit vans having exceeded mileage of over 150,000 and three years of operation, SunLine will replace these vans. This is consistent with federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of vehicles. Failure to replace these vehicles will result in significantly higher costs to maintain them in operating condition as major parts begin to fail. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $ 968,000 STA $ 242,000 TOTAL $ 1,210,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 59 TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL15-03 PROJECT NAME Transit Enhancements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funding requested for transit enhancements which will address FTA requirement to utilize 1 % of the Section 5307 apportionment on transit enhancements. This project will see the purchase and installation of 25 new bus shelters. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Continued improvements to bus stops for the safety and comfort of passengers. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $128,000 Prop 1 B Security $ 240,000 STA $ 32,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 60 TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER S L 15-04 PROJECT NAME Camera System Upgrade — 15 Orion Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funds requested in this fiscal year will enable SunLine to upgrade the camera system in 15 Orion buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Project is necessary to provide these buses with increased data storage capacity and easier download functionality for the bus camera system. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES Prop 1 B Security TOTAL $ 135,000 $ 135,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 61 TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 15-05 PROJECT NAME New CNG Fueling Station Thousand Palms PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project will see the final $3 million of expenditure to construct a new CNG fueling station at SunLine's Thousand Palms operating division. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Continuation of the project to replace the original CNG fueling station at Thousand Palms, which has reached its twenty year life span. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) STA $3,000,000 TOTAL $3,000,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 62 TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 15-06 PROJECT NAME Information Technology System (IT) Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase various IT equipment, software and hardware for existing agency system needs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Use of IT equipment is critical to the daily functions staff perform and helps to streamline operations and reports for SunLine services. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $200,000 STA $50,000 TOTAL $250,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 63 TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 15-07 PROJECT NAME Maintenance Tools & Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase major replacement tools, equipment and parts used in routine vehicle maintenance. The items to be purchased include multi meters, torque wrenches, impact sockets, software updates, service jacks, miscellaneous air and hand tools, and drill bits. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Equipment must be replaced to ensure proper maintenance of revenue service vehicles. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 STA TOTAL $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 64 TABLE 5.1.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 15-08 PROJECT NAME Purchase five (5) relief cars and one (1) SUV staff car as replacement vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase five (5) replacement CNG relief cars that have met their useful life based on federal guidelines. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This continues SunLine's goal of replacing non -revenue vehicles in its fleet in adherence to federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of these vehicles. Purchasing the replacement cars during this fiscal year ensures that SunLine continues to replace older vehicles in the fleet to comply with federal and state laws in a timely manner. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $169,600 STA $42,400 TOTAL $212,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 65 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funding Request for FY 2015116 DRAFT 051513 sunLlne Transit Agency FY 2015116 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Translt Plan THIRD DRAFT MAY 15 2013 Protect Description Captal Project Number Total Amount of Funds Total Carrywer Amount LTF Carryover LTF STA Prop16 Transit Secunty Prop 113 PTMISEA Measure Section 5307 Indio/Cathedral City Canyover Sechon 5307 Indio/Cathedral Section 5311 Section 5316 Section 5317 Other Revenue Earebox OPERATING Operating Assistance $24,679037 $0 $14,046,906 $0 $5,200,000 $350,000 $0 $264,566 $141,563 $26000 $900000 $3750,000 Preventive Maintenance $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 Subtotal: Operating] $26479,037 $0 $14,046906 $0 $0 $0 $5,200,000 $2,150,000 $0 $264,566 $141,563 $26,000 $900,000 $3,750,000 CAPITAL Bus Renabilltation SL-16-01 $200,000 $40,000 $160,000 11 Paratransit replacement vans EL-16-02 $1,210,000 $242,000 $968,000 Transit Enhancement(25 shelters) SL-16-03 $250,000 $150,000 $100,000 $0 Facility Improvements EL-16-04 $500,000 $100,000 $400,000 Bus Camera System Enhancements SL-16-05 $275,000 $275,000 $0 IT Pro'ects SL-16-06 $250000 $50000 $200,000 Maintenance Tools & Equipment EL-16-07 $100,000 $20,000 $80,000 Replacement SeMce Vehicles(6 cars) SL-16-08 $168,000 $84,000 $64,000 Subtotal: Capital $2,953,000 $0 $0 $0 $686,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $1,392,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating&Capital $29,432,037 $0 $14,046,908 $0 $66Q000 $375,000 $0 $5,200,0o0 $4,042,000 $0 $264,566 $141,563 $26,000 $900,000 $3,750,000 Proposed Funding Details Target Budget Projected FY 15f 16f LTF Projected FY15f16 Farebox Revenue Projected FY15f16 Other Funds Projected FY15f16 Measure A funds Projected FY15f16 Section 5307 Operating Funds Projected FY 15i16 Section 5311 Operating Funds Recommended FY 15f16 NF Funds Recommended FY 15f16 JARC Funds Estimated Operating Funding Total FY 15f16 Projected FY 15i16 STA Capital Projected FY15f16 5307 Capital $26,479,037 (FY14-15'1.02(2 % increase) $ 14,046,908 FY 14-15. plus unallocated carryover. $ 3,750,000 FY13-14. $ 900,000 As for FY 13-14: $ 5,200,000 As for FY14-15 plus carryover unallocated available. $ 2,150,000 As for FY14-15 plus carryover unallocated available - $ 264,566 As for FY12-13, 14-15 (FY1 3-14 had extra funds from FTA) $ 26,000 [This includes$21,000 Taxi Voucher program funds and$5,000 for Commuter Link 220]. $ 141,563 [This is for proposed Commuter Link 220& New North Shore Route]. $ 26,479,037 $ 2,300,000 $ 653,000 TABLE 5.2.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 16-01 PROJECT NAME Bus Rehabilitation PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funds requested will enable SunLine to rehabilitate various buses in its fleet due to fading of the painting and color scheme on the buses and other interior and exterior items, as well as purchase other equipment to repair or rehabilitate buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Currently, there are various buses in the fleet with paint and colors on the exterior and interior that has faded, plus other interior and exterior items. Rehabilitating these buses would restore colors in the interior and on the exterior. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 STA TOTAL $160,000 $40,000 $200,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 67 TABLE 5.2.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 16-02 ROJ ECT NAME Purchase eleven (11) replacement paratransit buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase eleven (11) replacement CNG paratransit vans to replace existing SunDial paratransit vans that have met their useful life of 150,000 miles and 3 years. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This continues SunLine's goal of replacing vans in its SunDial paratransit fleet as they reach their 150,000 miles of operation and 3 years of service. After reaching this milestone, vehicles tend to increase significantly in maintenance costs as key parts fail. Replacing eleven (11) vans per year will ensure this fleet is maintained in excellent operating condition. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $968,000 STA $242,000 TOTAL $1,210,000 68 TABLE 5.2.A— CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL16-03 PROJECT NAME Transit Enhancements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funding requested for transit enhancements which will address FTA requirement to utilize 1 % of the Section 5307 apportionment for transit enhancements. This project will fund the purchase and installation of 25 new bus shelters. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Continued improvements to bus stops for the safety and comfort of passengers. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1 B Security STA TOTAL $100,000 $150,000 $250,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 69 TABLE 5.2.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER S L 16-04 PROJECT NAME Facility Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Funds requested in this fiscal year will enable SunLine to improve existing facilities, including roof repair and replacement, new carpeting and blinds, and repave the Indio Bus Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Project is necessary for facilities and ground improvements at Thousand Palms and Indio. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES FTA Section 5307 $400,000 STA $100,000 TOTAL $500,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 70 TABLE 5.2.A— CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 16-05 PROJECT NAME Bus Camera System Enhancements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Upgrade cameras on fixed route buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Continued improvements in bus camera technology need to be made available to the SunLine fleet. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Prop 1 B Security TOTAL $275,000 $275,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 71 TABLE 5.2.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 16-06 PROJECT NAME Information Technology System (IT) Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase various IT equipment, software and hardware for existing agency system needs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Use of IT equipment is critical to the daily function's staff perform and helps to streamline operations and reports for SunLine services. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $200,000 STA $50,000 TOTAL $250,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 72 TABLE 5.2.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 16-07 PROJECT NAME Maintenance Tools & Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase major replacement tools, equipment and parts used in routine vehicle maintenance. The items to be purchased include multi meters, torque wrenches, impact sockets, software updates, service jacks, miscellaneous air and hand tools, and drill bits. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Equipment must be replaced to ensure proper maintenance of revenue service vehicles. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $80,000 STA $20,000 TOTAL $100,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 73 TABLE 5.2.A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PROJECT NUMBER SL 16-08 ROJECT NAME Purchase six (6) relief cars PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase six (6) replacement CNG relief cars that have met their useful life. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This continues SunLine's goal of replacing non -revenue vehicles in its fleet in adherence to federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of these vehicles. Purchasing the replacement cars during this fiscal year ensures that SunLine continues to replace older vehicles in the fleet to comply with federal and state laws in a timely manner. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) FTA Section 5307 $84,000 STA $84,000 TOTAL $168,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 74 TABLE 6 AUDITS SunLine also completed a State Triennial Audit for FY06/07-08/09 in 2010. The next TDA Audit for FY09/10-11/12 is currently underway with completion expected in June 2013. The State Triennial Review was completed by Mayer, Hoffman and McCann, PC and did not have any findings. 75 MEI MME litxrAk tar-. Frpaidion(arruksin Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plan Review SunLine Transit Agency Data Elements FY 2012/13 Plan FY 2012/13 Target FY 2012/13 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 4,636,918 Pas serger Miles 30,957,071 Total Adual Vehide Revenue Noun 250,371.0 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Miles 3,424,636.0 Total Adual Vehide Miles 3,776,168.0 Total Operating Expenses $22,276,993 Total Passerger Fare Revenue $3,987,354 Net Operating Expenses $18,289,639 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 1 17.89%1 ›= 17.55% 1 22.53%'Meets Target Disc retionary: 1. Operatirg Cost Per Revenue Hour $88.98 ‹= $88.82 $89.97 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Pas serger $3.94 ›= $3.20 and a= $4.34 $3.72 Meets Target 3. Subs i* Per Pas se rger Mile $0.59 ›= $0.48 and ‹=$0.64 $0.56 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Harr $73.05 ›= $59.76 and ‹= $80.86 $69.70 Meets Target S. Subsidy Per PelIe $5.34 ›= $4.39 and ‹= $5.95 $5.01 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 18.50 ›= 15.81 and ‹= 21.39 18.70 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 1.35 ›= 1.16 and ‹= 1.58 1.34 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least flout of CiscretionaryPerformance Indicatom Produc tivit y Perform once Su mm ary: Service Provider Comments: ��M M " I i N r s ���� L u f f y k o a p a m i n o { u o v m s n F Y 0 1 / 1 4 - T a b l e 8 - - S R T P P e r f o r m a n c e R e p o r t S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r : S u n C i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y A l l R o u t e s P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s F Y 2 0 1 1 f 1 2 E n d o f Y e a r A c t u a l F Y 2 0 1 2 f 1 3 3 r d Q u a r t e r Y e a r - t o - D a t e F Y 2 O 1 3 / 1 4 P l a n F Y 2 O 1 3 / 1 4 T a r g e t P l a n P e r f o r m a n c e S c o r e c a r d ( a ) P a s s e r g e r s 4 , 5 6 1 , 6 3 7 3 , 5 3 4 , 8 3 8 5 , 1 9 0 , 4 1 8 N o n e P a s s e r g e r F Y I l e s 3 0 , 4 7 5 , 6 7 0 2 3 , 6 4 0 , 0 7 5 3 4 , 6 3 5 , 6 0 0 N o n e R e v e n u e H o u r s 2 4 6 , 5 1 2 . 7 1 8 8 , 8 2 2 . 6 2 7 3 , 4 4 2 . 0 N o n e T a a l H o u r s 2 6 2 , 2 3 6 . 6 1 9 9 , 3 2 8 . 7 2 8 8 , 7 6 0 . 0 N o n e R e v e n u e M i l e s 3 , 3 4 9 , 0 8 2 . 3 2 , 6 2 8 , 4 9 8 . 1 3 , 8 9 3 , 9 4 8 . 0 N o n e T c t a l M i l e s 3 , 6 9 3 , 8 9 8 . 1 2 , 8 7 3 , 5 3 5 . 2 4 , 2 6 1 , 7 2 6 . 0 N o n e O p e r a k i n g C o s t s $ 2 1 , 9 3 8 , 4 0 8 $ 1 6 , 9 8 8 , 2 9 9 $ 2 4 , 9 5 0 , 8 2 4 N o n e P a s s e r g e r R e v e n u e $ 4 , 0 6 4 , 6 6 6 $ 3 , 8 2 8 , 0 2 6 $ 4 , 4 7 6 , 3 0 0 N o n e O p e r a k i n g S u b s i d y . $ 1 7 , 8 7 3 , 7 4 3 $ 1 3 , 1 6 0 , 2 7 3 $ 2 0 , 4 7 4 , 5 2 4 N o n e O p e r a k i n g C o s t s P e r R e v e n u e H c u r $ 8 9 , 0 0 $ 8 9 , 9 7 $ 9 1 , 2 5 9 _ $ 9 1 , 9 7 M e e k s T a r g e t O p e r a k i n g C o s t P e r R e v e n u e M i l e $ 6 , 5 5 $ 6 , 4 6 $ 6 , 4 1 N o n e O p e r a k i n g C o s t s P e r P a s s e n g e r $ 4 , 8 1 $ 4 , 8 1 $ 4 , 8 1 N o n e F a r e b c a R e c o v e r y R a t i o 1 8 , 5 3 % 2 2 , 5 3 % 1 7 , 9 4 % : = 1 7 , 6 % M e e k s T a r g e t S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r $ 3 , 9 2 $ 3 , 7 2 $ 3 , 9 4 : _ $ 3 , 1 6 a n d 9 = $ 4 , 2 8 M e e k s T a r g e t S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r M i l e $ 0 , 5 9 $ 0 , 5 6 $ 0 , 5 9 : _ $ 0 , 4 8 a n d 9 _ $ 0 , 6 4 M e e k s T a r g e t S u b s i d y P e r R e v e n u e H c u r $ 7 2 , 5 1 $ 6 9 , 7 0 $ 7 4 , 8 8 : _ $ 5 9 , 2 5 a n d 9 _ $ 8 0 , 1 6 M e e k s T a r g e t S u b s i d y P e r R e v e n u e M i l e $ 5 , 3 4 $ 5 , 0 1 $ 5 , 2 6 : _ $ 4 , 2 6 a n d 9 _ $ 5 , 7 6 M e e k s T a r g e t P a s s e r g e r s P e r R e v e n u e H a r r 1 8 , 5 0 1 8 , 7 0 1 9 , 0 0 : = 1 5 , 9 0 a n d 9 = 2 1 , 5 1 M e e k s T a r g e t P a s s e r g e r s P e r R e v e n u e P e l l e 1 , 3 6 1 , 3 4 1 , 3 3 : = 1 , 1 4 a n d 9 = 1 , 5 4 M e e k s T a r g e t a ) T h e P i a n P e r f o r m a n c e S c o r e c a r d c d u m n i s t h e r e s u l t o f c o m p a r i r g t h e F Y 2 0 1 3 f 1 4 P l a n k o t h e F Y 2 0 1 3 f 1 4 P r i m a r y T a r g e t , TABLE 9 HIGHLIGHTS OF FY 2013/14 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • Implement new Indio - Palm Desert and North Shore — Indio bus services. • Implement improvements to Lines 14, 15, 24, 30, 32, 53, 90, 91, and 111. • Continue working with local jurisdictions on bus stop improvements including procurement of more bus shelters. • Complete construction of and occupy the new Administrative Building project at Thousand Palms. • Continue new Taxi Voucher Program in Coachella Valley and the Riverside Commuter Link 220 express bus service. Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data (will be completed in subsequent draft) Operating & Financial Data FY 09/10 Audited FY 10/11 Audited FY 11/12 Estimated FY 12/13 Estimated FY 13/14 Planned Systemwide Ridership 3,713,752 4,155,480 4,561,637 4,713,117 $5,190,418 Operating Cost Per Revenue Hr. $91.72 $89.93 $89.00 $89.97 $91.25 Comments: SunLine anticipates meeting all mandatory and discretionary targets for FY 2013/14. 78 Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2011/12 Audit FY 12/13 (Estimate) FY 13/14 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 3,207,329 3,350,000 3,350,000 2. Interest 3,327 - - 3. General Fund Supplement - - - 4. Measure A 4,256,881 4,500,000 5,217,000 5. Advertising Revenue 25,378 - - 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets - - - 7. CNG Revenue 390,064 419,225 419,225 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - - - 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - 846,701 423,000 10. Investment Income - - - 11. CalPers CERBT - - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - - - 13. Other Revenues 438,747 72,717 72,717 TOTAL REVENUE 8,321,727 9,188,643 9,481,942 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 26,201,619 22,276,993 22,276,993 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 31.76% 41.25% 42.56% 79 " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : M a r t h a D u r b i n , S t a f f A n a l y s t J o s e f i n a C l e m e n t e , T r a n s i t M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : F e d e r a l F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 3 F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 C a p i t a l G r a n t A p p l i c a t i o n s S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A d o p t t h e F F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s ( F T A ) S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y p r o j e c t r a n k i n g s a s r e c o m m e n d e d b y t h e l o c a l r e v i e w . c o m m i t t e e ( L R C ) ; 2 ) A d o p t R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 - 0 0 8 , " R e s o l u t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n C e r t i f y i n g P r o j e c t C o n s i s t e n c y w i t h R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n " , c e r t i f y i n g t h e p r o j e c t s a r e d e r i v e d f r o m a l o c a l l y d e v e l o p e d , c o o r d i n a t e d p u b l i c t r a n s i t - h u m a n s e r v i c e s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n ( C o o r d i n a t e d P l a n ) ; a n d 3 ) I n c l u d e t h e p r o j e c t s i n t h e F e d e r a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( F T I P ) . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 2 , C a l t r a n s i s s u e d a c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s t o s o c i a l s e r v i c e a n d p u b l i c a g e n c i e s f o r t h e F F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 E l d e r l y a n d D i s a b l e d S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t P r o g r a m . T h i s c a p i t a l - o n l y p r o g r a m d e d i c a t e d t o s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t ( s e r v i n g e l d e r l y a n d p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s , w h e r e p u b l i c t r a n s i t i s o t h e r w i s e u n a v a i l a b l e , i n s u f f i c i e n t , o r i n a p p r o p r i a t e ) i s u s e d m o s t l y f o r a c c e s s i b l e v a n s a n d b u s e s , c o m p u t e r h a r d w a r e a n d s o f t w a r e , a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n e q u i p m e n t . C a l t r a n s i s t h e l e a d a g e n c y o n t h i s s t a t e w i d e d i s c r e t i o n a r y p r o g r a m . T h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s r o l e i s t o p e r f o r m a n a d v i s o r y r e v i e w o f p r o j e c t s w i t h i n t h e r e g i o n , s u b m i t a r e g i o n a l p r i o r i t y l i s t t o C a l t r a n s , a n d a m e n d f u n d e d p r o j e c t s i n t h e F T 1 P w h e n a p p r o v e d . P r o g r a m f u n d s a r e a p p o r t i o n e d a m o n g t h e s t a t e s b y a f o r m u l a b a s e d o n t h e n u m b e r o f e l d e r l y a n d p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s i n e a c h s t a t e a c c o r d i n g t o t h e l a t e s t a v a i l a b l e U . S . c e n s u s d a t a . P r o j e c t s f u n d e d b y t h e S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 p r o g r a m r e q u i r e c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h o t h e r f e d e r a l l y - a s s i s t e d p r o g r a m s i n o r d e r t o m a k e t h e m o s t e f f i c i e n t u s e o f f e d e r a l r e s o u r c e s . P r o g r a m f u n d s a r e t y p i c a l l y u s e d A g e n d a I t e m 9 N 2 3 3 to provide up to 88.53 percent federal share of the capital cost and requires at least 11.47 percent in local match. However, for this FFY 2012/13 funding cycle as in the two previous funding cycles, agencies will receive up to 100 percent in federal funds with the usage of toll credits. Approximately $13 million in federal funds is available for programming for the FFY 2012/13 grant cycle. During the previous funding cycle, Riverside County requested approximately $1 million from Section 5310 and all project proposals - submitted by the five agencies were funded. The LRCs in each county quantitatively evaluate all applications submitted for that area, rank them using state -mandated criteria, and submit a regional priority list to Caltrans. The Commission's evaluation committee for this year, after putting out a public request for volunteers was comprised of a member of the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council, one non-public agency representative, one AMMA consultant staff, and one Commission staff. The scoring criteria used to evaluate Section 5310 project proposals are as follows: CALTRANS EVALUATION CRITERIA Points Ability of the Applicant 32 Coordination Planning (12 pts.) and Coordinated Use of Vehicles (6 pts.) 18 Transportation Service (Replacement, Expansion or Other Equipment) '' 20 Service Effectiveness 30 Total Points Available to Evaluate FTA Sec 5310 Project Applications 100 A total of six agencies located in Riverside County submitted grant applications requesting $986,000 in total cost for 16 projects that include five replacement vehicles, eight expansion vehicles, and three for mobile radios. Following a preliminary scoring earlier this year, staff worked with each applicant agency to improve its scores for the statewide competitive process. The attachment summarizes the LRC's proposed regional priority list for FY 2013 showing the regional scores, which was forwarded to Caltrans prior to the May 13, 2013, project submission deadline. This list will become final pending Commission approval of the staff recommendation and adoption of Resolution No. 13-008. All applicants have been notified of the LRC project scores and were given the opportunity to appeal. No appeals were received. Caltrans is due to release the statewide results in July 2013, and it is anticipated the California Transportation Commission (CTC) will adopt the final list of funded projects in August 2013. Upon final grant awards by the CTC, the Commission will include the FTA funded projects in the FY 2013/14 FTIP. The Commission is also required to certify by resolution the projects are derived from the Coordinated Plan. The Commission published its Coordinated Plan in April 2008 and the 2012 • • Agenda Item 9N 234 " C o o r d i n a t e d P l a n U p d a t e i n J u l y 2 0 1 2 f o r u s e a s a r e s o u r c e f o r S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 , S e c t i o n 5 3 1 6 ( J o b A c c e s s a n d R e v e r s e C o m m u t e ) a n d S e c t i o n 5 3 1 7 ( N e w F r e e d o m ) p r o g r a m a p p l i c a n t s . T h e r e i s n o f i n a n c i a l i m p a c t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n , a s C a l t r a n s d i s b u r s e s t h e S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 f u n d s d i r e c t l y t o t h e r e c i p i e n t s . A t t a c h m e n t s : 1 ) R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 - 0 0 8 2 ) F F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 P r o p o s e d R e g i o n a l P r i o r i t y L i s t A g e n d a I t e m 9 N 2 3 5 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. 13-008 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CERTIFYING PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Local Review Committee of Riverside County ("Committee") is charged with reviewing applications for Federal Transit Administration's Section 5310 funding for transportation services to meet the needs of seniors and persons with disabilities for whom public transportation services are otherwise unavailable, insufficient or inappropriate; and WHEREAS, the Committee has received requests for 16 projects from six agencies in Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Committee has scored and ranked each such request; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Commission"), as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency ("RTPA"), adopted the scores and ranking of the applications as determined by the Committee; and WHEREAS, the Section 5310 process, as interpreted in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1 F, Section 4, requires the RTPA to include in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program each request awarded Section 5310 funding by Caltrans and to certify by resolution that the evaluated projects are derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit -human services transportation plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the Commission does hereby certify and resolve as follows: Section 1 The Commission has determined that the locally evaluated projects approved by the Committee for Section 5310 funding are derived from the Riverside County Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Coordinated Plan (adopted by the Commission on April 9, 2008) and the 2012 Update (approved July 2012). 236 Attachment 1 Section 2. Each of the projects awarded Section 5310 funding by Ca!trans will be included in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program adopted for Riverside County. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 237 " S E C T I O N 5 3 1 0 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y R E G I O N A L P R I O R I T Y L I S T F Y 2 0 1 3 A l i H M E N T 2 P r o j e c t N o . A g e n c y E q u i p m e n t T y p e S e c t i o n 1 ( M a x 3 2 p t s ) S e c t i o n 2 ( M a x 1 8 p t s ) S e c t i o n 3 ( M a x 2 0 p t s ) S e c t i o n 4 ( M a x 3 0 p t s ) T O T A L ( M a x 1 0 0 p t s ) F e d e r a l L o c a l P r o j e c t T o t a l i P e p p e r m i n t R i d g e R M o d i f i e d R a i s e d T o p V a n 3 2 1 8 2 0 2 3 9 3 $ 4 4 , 2 6 5 $ 5 , 7 3 5 $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 2 P e p p e r m i n t R i d g e O E M o b i l e R a d i o 3 2 1 8 2 0 2 3 9 3 8 8 5 1 1 5 1 , 0 0 0 3 A n g e l V i e w , I n c . S E L a r g e r B u s 3 2 1 8 1 6 2 6 9 2 9 2 , 9 5 7 1 2 , 0 4 4 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 4 A n g e l V i e w , I n c . S E L a r g e r B u s 3 2 1 8 1 6 2 6 9 2 9 2 , 9 5 7 1 2 , 0 4 4 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 5 D e s e r t A r c R M i n i v a n 3 2 1 6 2 0 2 3 9 1 3 9 , 8 3 9 5 , 1 6 2 4 5 , 0 0 0 6 D e s e r t A r c R M e d i u m B u s C N G 3 2 1 6 2 0 2 3 9 1 8 0 , 5 6 2 1 0 , 4 3 8 9 1 , 0 0 0 7 D e s e r t A r c R L a r g e B u s 3 2 1 6 2 0 2 3 9 1 6 4 , 6 2 7 8 , 3 7 3 7 3 , 0 0 0 8 S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y O E M o b i l e R a d i o 3 2 1 8 1 5 2 3 8 8 8 8 5 1 1 5 1 , 0 0 0 9 S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y O E M o b i l e R a d i o 3 2 1 8 1 5 2 3 8 8 8 8 5 1 1 5 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 D e s e r t A r c S E L a r g e B u s 3 2 1 6 1 6 2 3 8 7 6 4 , 6 2 7 8 , 3 7 3 7 3 , 0 0 0 1 1 C a r e - A - V a n T r a n s i t S E M i n i v a n 3 2 1 8 1 5 2 1 8 6 3 9 , 8 3 9 5 , 1 6 2 4 5 , 0 0 0 1 2 C a r e - A - V a n T r a n s i t S E M o d i f i e d R a i s e d T o p V a n 3 2 1 8 1 5 2 1 8 6 4 4 , 2 6 5 5 , 7 3 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 3 D e s e r t A r c S E L a r g e B u s C N G 3 2 1 6 1 5 2 3 8 6 8 5 , 8 7 4 1 1 , 1 2 6 9 7 , 0 0 0 1 4 F r i e n d s o f M o r e n o V a l l e y S e n i o r C e n t e r I n c . R M e d i u m B u s 3 2 1 8 1 5 2 1 8 6 5 9 , 3 1 5 7 , 6 8 5 6 7 , 0 0 0 1 5 S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y S E M e d i u m B u s C N G 3 2 1 8 1 3 2 3 8 6 8 0 , 5 6 2 1 0 , 4 3 8 9 1 , 0 0 0 1 6 S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y S E M e d i u m B u s C N G 3 2 1 8 1 3 2 3 8 6 8 0 , 5 6 2 1 0 , 4 3 8 9 1 , 0 0 0 " S E - S e r v i c e E x p a n s i o n ; R = R e p l a c e m e n t V e h i c l e ; O E = O t h e r E q u i p m e n t s / 2 0 / 1 3 T o t a l s $ 8 7 2 , 9 0 6 $ 1 1 3 , 0 9 4 $ 9 8 6 , 0 0 0 2 3 8 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 12, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Metrolink Budget for Fiscal Year 2013/14 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt the preliminary FY 2013/14 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget with anticipation of a 3 to 7 percent fare increase; 2► Approve the additional 91 Line service with two additional peak period round trips; 3) Allocate the Commission's funding commitment to the SCRRA in an amount • not to exceed $8,401,000 in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for train operations and maintenance of way plus a contingency of $2,061,500 in LTF funds for new service options and fare policy possibilities; and 4) Allocate the Commission's Section 5309 grant funds in an amount not to exceed $1,729,300 for SCRRA capital rehabilitation projects. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Metrolink is the brand name for the services operated by SCRRA. By virtue of the SCRRA joint powers agreement, the five member agencies that comprise Metrolink must formally commit to fund their proportionate shares of commuter rail operating and capital costs. Each member agency must approve the budget before adoption of a final budget by the SCRRA Board, no later than June 30, 2013. Service and funding levels are limited by the policy and budget constraints of the member agencies and are negotiated each year. Agenda Item 10 239 FY 2012/13 Metrolink Review The following is a review of Metrolink's FY 2012/13 activities: • Another significant change in leadership with a new Chief Executive Officer and the removal of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Other staff level changes have occurred in finance department staff, communications, procurement, and other departments; • Implemented the new fifth peak period Inland Empire Orange County Line (IEOC) trains that has proven successful with an 11 percent year to date ridership growth, the highest of all the Metrolink lines; • Conducted a follow up assessment by the Peer Safety Review Committee that led to additional recommendations; • Further developed the positive train control (PTC) program with progress being made by the vendor integrator contractor with target completion late 2013 for one line with future lines to be implemented in 2014; • Implemented new computer assisted dispatching software; • Implemented new Oraclefinancial software; • Continued successful IEOC Friday night Angel's Trains; • Initiated development of Transit Access Pass (TAP) enabled "smart" tickets to provide seamless transfers to Metrolink commuters as a result of Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (Metro) locked gate program for Metro Red Line users; and • Approved purchase of Tier 4 locomotives to be delivered starting in 2016. FY 2013/14 Looking Forward Looking ahead to FY 2013/14, Metrolink intends to: • Continue safety focus; • Expand 91 Line service with two additional peak -period round trip trains; • Implement the PTC program with target completion by 2013; • Initiate new strategic plan development; • Implement the TAP program with smart tickets allowing Metrolink riders to pass through the locked Metro Red Line gates;' and • Provide new leadership direction including addressing financial concerns. Riverside County Service Impact Proposed for FY 2013/14 Three Metrolink commuter rail lines traverse Riverside County the Riverside Line, the 1E0C Line, and the 91 Line. Staff proposed a service option to use the recently purchased Commission -owned rail cars to expand the 91 Line service with four additional peak service trains. This proposal has the potential to greatly improve service for all Riverside residents and compliment the State Route 91 Corridor Agenda Item .10 240 " " I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t e x p a n s i o n p r o j e c t b y p r o v i d i n g g r e a t e r o p t i o n s d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n . A d d i t i o n a l c o o r d i n a t i o n s t i l l n e e d s t o t a k e p l a c e w i t h t h e h o s t r a i l r o a d , B u r l i n g t o n N o r t h e r n S a n t a F e , w i t h t h e o b j e c t i v e o f s t a r t i n g t h i s n e w s e r v i c e i n O c t o b e r 2 0 1 3 . T h e e s t i m a t e f o r s u c h s e r v i c e o n t h e 9 1 L i n e i s a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e $ 4 2 0 , 0 0 0 f o r t h e f i r s t 1 2 m o n t h s , a n d s t a f f h a s i n c l u d e d a n a m o u n t i n t h e c o n t i n g e n c y f o r t h i s p u r p o s e . C o m m i s s i o n ' s F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 O p e r a t i n g S u b s i d y O b l i g a t i o n O n M a y 3 , 2 0 1 3 , S C R R A s u b m i t t e d a p r e l i m i n a r y b u d g e t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n . T h i s i s a t e n t a t i v e b u d g e t t h a t p r o v i d e s p r o p o s e d b u d g e t f i g u r e s a n d i s c o n t i n g e n t o n t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e S C R R A p u b l i c h e a r i n g o n J u n e 1 4 o f t h e p r o p o s e d f a r e i n c r e a s e . T h e p r o p o s e d b u d g e t i n f o r m a t i o n p r e s e n t e d a s s u m e s a 5 p e r c e n t f a r e i n c r e a s e , o t h e r f a r e m o d i f i c a t i o n s , a n d a 2 p e r c e n t r i d e r s h i p i n c r e a s e . T h e S C R R A r e q u e s t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s $ 8 , 4 0 1 , 0 0 0 f o r o p e r a t i o n s a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f w a y , w h i c h r e p r e s e n t s a $ 7 5 9 , 0 0 0 i n c r e a s e o r 9 . 9 p e r c e n t o v e r t h e F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 S C R R A b u d g e t . T h e s e a m o u n t s d o n o t i n c l u d e t h e a d d i t i o n a l 9 1 L i n e s e r v i c e t h a t h a s b e e n p r o p o s e d . T h e r e f o r e , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s a p p r o v i n g a b u d g e t o f u p t o $ 1 0 , 4 6 2 , 5 0 0 m i l l i o n , w h i c h i n c l u d e s a c o n t i n g e n c y o f $ 2 , 0 6 1 , 5 0 0 t o i n c l u d e t h e f u l l d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e n e w s e r v i c e a n d a l l o w f l e x i b i l i t y t o a c c o u n t f o r t h e u n k n o w n i m p a c t s o f t h e p r o p o s e d f a r e i n c r e a s e . O n c e t h e f a r e i n c r e a s e a n d s e r v i c e p l a n s a r e f i n a l i z e d , s t a f f w i l l f u n d t h e a p p r o p r i a t e o p e r a t i n g s u b s i d y t o S C R R A . A s w i t h p a s t f u n d i n g , t h e o p e r a t i n g s u b s i d y w i l l b e p a i d f r o m L T F r e v e n u e s a l l o c a t e d f o r r a i l o p e r a t i o n s . O p e r a t i n g C o s t O v e r v i e w T h e o v e r a l l M e t r o l i n k F Y 2 0 1 3 / 4 3 o p e r a t i n g b u d g e t i s $ 2 1 0 , 3 8 9 , 0 0 0 , w h i c h i s $ 1 4 . 3 m i l l i o n o r 7 . 3 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n t h e F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 b u d g e t . T h e f o l l o w i n g e l e m e n t s r e p r e s e n t t h e v a r i o u s i n c r e a s e s : " I m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f P T C w i t h a n $ 8 . 6 m i l l i o n o r 3 2 p e r c e n t i n c r e a s e i n m a i n t e n a n c e o f w a y e x p e n s e s ; " I n c r e a s e i n n o n - l a b o r e x p e n s e s o f $ 3 . 7 m i l l i o n o r 2 2 9 p e r c e n t w i t h a m a j o r i t y o f t h e s e c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h P T C l i c e n s e s , a g r e e m e n t s , a n d l a b o r ; " A n i n c r e a s e i n t h e o p e r a t i n g c o n t r a c t e x p e n s e s f o r t r a i n c r e w s r e l a t e d t o t h e n e w m a i n t e n a n c e f a c i l i t y a n d a d d i t i o n a l c o n t r a c t u a l o b l i g a t i o n s , r e s u l t i n g i n $ 2 . 7 m i l l i o n o r a 7 . 5 p e r c e n t l i n e i t e m b u d g e t i n c r e a s e o v e r t h e p r e v i o u s y e a r ; " A $ 1 . 6 m i l l i o n i n c r e a s e i n e q u i p m e n t m a i n t e n a n c e w i t h a d d e d p o s i t i o n s a n d c l e a n i n g e x p e n s e s ; a n d " A n i n c r e a s e i n t h e c o s t o f t i c k e t s r e l a t e d t o t h e T A P p r o g r a m o f $ 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 . A g e n d a I t e m 1 0 2 4 1 In last year's report, staff identified the following concerns: First, over the past year through a number of audits, it has come to light that there are significant issues with SCRRA's capital grants oversight, financial procedures, and financial information system. In addition, there are concerns with tracking of inventory that required almost half of the inventory to be written off as of June 30, 2011. While efforts are underway to correct these issues, the Commission requires sufficient information in order to continue diligent oversight regarding the use of Riverside County's transportation funds. The oversight of the financial operations of SCRRA continues to be a significant concern. During FY 2012/13, it came to light there were even more serious financial concerns than previously identified. The SCRRA Board initiated. a Finance Ad Hoc Committee to review the financial performance of the agency. After months of coordination with the staff, the Finance Ad Hoc Committee released a very detailed and critical report indentifying a number of significant failures in the financial operations of the agency. Swift action was taken by the Board to address the issues and the CFO chose to resign. An interim CFO worked with the remaining staff to diligently respond to a backlog of invoices and stabilized the financial condition of the agency. In addition, a Member Agency Advisory Committee was established with representatives from each member agency with either the CFO or key finance staff actively participating. The group initiated additional audit work through the existing SCRRA external audit firm to assess current conditions and also established a scope of work for a financial consultant to perform an extensive review of and provide recommendations for the effective financial administration of SCRRA. This consultant should be on board in the next couple of months. SCRRA is also exploring the need for a forensic audit to review any specific areas of concern that the financial consultant or others might identify. Commission staff feels all these combined actions will help to address the financial health of the organization and are a positive step in rebuilding the integrity of the agency. Capital Contribution The Commission's capital rehabilitation and renovation obligation for FY 2013/14 is projected' at $1,729,300. This is the recommended amount based on available matching funding from other member agencies. The full rehabilitation obligation uses FTA Section 5309 grant funds that will pass through the Commission. Staff has executed a $10 million FTA Section 5309 grant application that will provide ongoing funding for the rehabilitation program for this year and several years to come. As a new process this year, SCRRA will need to invoice the Commission for the reimbursement of expenses. This will provide additional oversight and project controls for Commission funding. • • Agenda Item 10 242 " " " T h e s e f u n d s w i l l b e u s e d f o r v a r i o u s p r o j e c t s i n c l u d i n g r e h a b i l i t a t i o n a n d r e n o v a t i o n o f r o l l i n g s t o c k ( c a r s a n d l o c o m o t i v e s ) a n d t r a c k p r o j e c t s , t i c k e t v e n d i n g m a c h i n e u p g r a d e s , a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f w a y t e c h n o l o g y i m p r o v e m e n t s . T h i s a l s o i n c l u d e s $ 5 5 5 , 0 0 0 f o r t h e p u r c h a s e o f T i e r 4 l o c o m o t i v e s . S u m m a r y F i n a n c i a l S u b s i d y I m p a c t t o C o m m i s s i o n T h e S C R R A - p r o p o s e d C o m m i s s i o n o p e r a t i n g s u b s i d y i s $ 8 , 4 0 1 , 0 0 0 , w h i c h r e p r e s e n t s 4 p e r c e n t o f t h e $ 2 1 0 , 3 8 9 , 0 0 0 M e t r o l i n k o p e r a t i n g b u d g e t . U s i n g L T F f u n d s , a t o t a l o p e r a t i n g s u b s i d y o f $ 1 0 , 4 6 2 , 5 0 0 c o m p r i s e d o f $ 8 , 4 0 1 , 0 0 0 p l u s a c o n t i n g e n c y o f $ 2 , 0 6 1 , 5 0 0 f o r n e w 9 1 L i n e s e r v i c e , i s i n c l u d e d i n t h e p r o p o s e d F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 b u d g e t b e i n g p r e s e n t e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n J u n e 2 0 1 3 f o r a p p r o v a l . T h e t o t a l c a p i t a l r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s u b s i d y o f $ 1 , 7 2 9 , 3 0 0 w i l l b e f u n d e d w i t h F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 f u n d s t h a t w i l l p a s s t h r o u g h t h e C o m m i s s i o n . S y s t e m w i d e I n F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 , M e t r o l i n k w i l l c e l e b r a t e i t s 2 1 s ` y e a r p r o v i d i n g M e t r o l i n k c o m m u t e r r a i l s e r v i c e i n S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . O p e n i n g w i t h t h r e e F i n e s a n d 1 2 s t a t i o n s i n O c t o b e r 1 9 9 2 , t h e S C R R A t o d a y o p e r a t e s o v e r 5 1 2 r o u t e m i l e s o n s e v e n l i n e s , s e r v i n g 5 5 s t a t i o n s i n s i x c o u n t i e s . A v e r a g e w e e k d a y r i d e r s h i p i s p r o j e c t e d t o t o t a l o v e r 4 4 , 0 0 0 o n e - w a y t r i p s , w h i c h i s a r e l a t i v e l y f l a t p r o j e c t i o n b a s e d o n c u r r e n t t r e n d s . I n 2 0 0 4 , t h e M e t r o l i n k B o a r d a p p r o v e d a 1 0 - y e a r f a r e r e s t r u c t u r i n g p r o g r a m t h a t b e g a n J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 5 , a n d c h a n g e d t h e m e t h o d f o r c a l c u l a t i n g f a r e s t o o n e b a s e d o n t h e d r i v i n g m i l e a g e b e t w e e n s t a t i o n s . T h e 1 0 - y e a r f a r e r e s t r u c t u r i n g p r o g r a m i n c l u d e d a n u n d e r l y i n g a v e r a g e a n n u a l f a r e i n c r e a s e o f 3 . 5 p e r c e n t . T h i s p r o g r a m a l o n g w i t h t h e p o t e n t i a l f a r e i n c r e a s e b e t w e e n 3 t o 7 p e r c e n t w i l l b e d i s c u s s e d a t a J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 3 S p e c i a l M e t r o l i n k B o a r d m e e t i n g a n d p u b l i c h e a r i n g . F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t : Y e s Y e s Y e a r : F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 A m o u n t : 5 1 0 , 4 6 2 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 7 2 9 , 3 0 0 S o u r c e o f F u n d s : O p e r a t i o n s - L T F B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t : N o N o G L A N o . : 2 5 4 1 9 9 8 6 1 0 1 1 0 3 2 5 8 6 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 7 8 6 1 0 2 2 6 5 3 3 8 6 1 0 2 $ 1 0 , 4 6 2 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 7 2 9 , 3 0 0 F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d : \ 1 1 1 4 e 4 4 4 , 1 4 D a t e : 0 5 / 2 8 / 1 3 A t t a c h m e n t : S C R R A F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 B u d g e t O p e r a t i n g S u b s i d y A l l o c a t i o n b y C o u n t y A g e n d a I t e m 1 0 2 4 3 Attachment A-4 • • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 PROPOSED BUDGET Operating Subsidy Allocation By Member Agency ($000s) 2% Ridership Growth/5% Fare Increase/Weekend Pass/PCA Charge Total FY 13-14 Metro Share OCTA Share RCTC Share SANBAG Share VCTC Share Expenses Train Operations & Services 125,523 66,118 28,800 9,592 15,492 5,520 Maintenance -of -Way 36,193 20,882 7,498 1,077 4,506 2,231 Administration & Services 30,006 15,288 5,557 2,987 3,228 2,946 Insurance 18,667 10,035 4,080 1,274 2,632 645 Total Expenses Incl. MOW 210,389 112,323 45,936 14,931 25,858 11,342 Revenues Gross Farebox 92,171 48,281 21,745 6,485 12,838 2,823 Dispatching 2,699 1,412 904 - 56 326 Other Operating 670 377 140 44 88 21 Maintenance -of -Way 13,867 9,508 2,612 0 1,217 530 Total Revenues 109,407 59,577 25,401 6,529 14,200 3,700 Total County Allocation 100,983 52,746 20,535 8,401 11,658 7,642 FY 2012-13 Budget 90,670 46,066 19,933 7,642 10,186 6,844 Increase/(Decrease) 10,312 6,680 602 759 1,472 799 Percentage Change 11.4% 14.5% 3.0% 9.9% 14.5% 11.7% INCREASE/(DECREASE) FROM FY12-13 BUDGET Total Variance Metro Share OCTA Share RCTC Share SANBAG Share VCTC Share Expenses Train Operations & Services 2,220 1,728 (309) 168 483 151 Maintenance -of -Way 8,507 4,876 1,721 408 964 538 Administration & Services 3,502 2,166 520 327 338 151 Insurance 67 90 178 (156) 12 (57) Total Expenses Incl. MOW 14,297 8,860 2,109 747 1,797 783 Revenues Gross Farebox 3,874 1,638 1,756 8 353 119 Dispatching (64) (69) (3) - 9 (1) Other Operating 0 28 (5) (20) 5 (7) Maintenance -of -Way 174 583 (240) (0) (42) (127) Total Revenues 3,984 2,180 1,508 (12) 325 (15) Total County Allocation 10,312 6,680 602 759 1,472 799 244 6/12/2013 ._ 2013/14 Operating Budget • Operating budget $210 million (Up 7.3 percent, $14.3 million) • Avg. daily ridership 44,000 (Relatively Flat with 2 percent increase to actual) • Proposed 3-7 percent fare increase (Board to vote on June 14) • 91 Line Expanded service -t _ } 1 I i■ * ■ . "en. le . a 1 6/12/2013 L RCTC Impact • RCTC final operating subsidy will depend on the amount of fare increase and timing of implementation • Budget proposes $8.4 million with $2 million for new 91 Line service and contingency • Additional SCRRA funding needs will come back to the Commission i • RCTC Rehabilitation capital subsidy of $1.7 million is 4.9 percent share, funded with FTA funds • Locomotive Tier 4 Purchase part of Rehab Funding along with AQMD Grant and Proposition 1A Funds • Unique to Riverside, 1.1111._ '':'Ff RCTC subsidizes the. �+ 5 Riverside County Stations at approx. �' •-'� $2.5 million a years 2 2013/ 14 Operating Budget • $14.3 million in net cost increases • $8.6 million - Positive Train Control/Track Maintenance • $3.7 million - Non -Labor expense (PTC licenses, etc) • $2.7 million - Train crew increase • $1.6 million - Train equipment maintenance increase • $0.75 million - TAP programs costs Offset with projected $2.5 million in fuel cost saving, and other cost controls. M, 2.013/ 14 Service Expansion • Enhanced Service Proposed for 91 Lines — Proposal for two new peak round trips to aid 91 freeway projects and reduce load factor on existing trains — Locomotive and cars have already been purchased — Coordinating with BNSF for train moves New 91 Line Trains: ➢ Riverside 4:54 AM to Los Angeles 6:30 AM ➢ Riverside 5:54 AM to Los Angeles 7:30 AM (LA Arrival Pattern: 6:30, 7, 7:30, 8 AM) ➢ Los Angeles 6:05 PM to Riverside 7:40 PM ➢ Los Angeles 6:40 PM to Riverside 8:15 PM (LA Departure Pattern: 4:20, 5:25, 6:05, 6:40 PM) 6/12/2013 �r Fare Increase • Public comment open May 17, SNB Meeting June 5 • Public Hearing June 14 • Proposed range from 3 to 7 percent, staff and member agencies recommend 5 percent • A 5 percent increase generates $4 million • Change $10 Weekend Pass to Weekend Day Pass tom_: ° 4�••• F • Riverside to LA fare change at estimated 5 percent — Current $352 monthly pass would go up $17 — Current $25 round trip would go up $1.25 • Prior Year Increases MEMAmount 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 5% None 3.5% 4.5% 5.5% 3.5% Fare Increase Amount 2008 5.5% 2009 3.5% 2010 6% 2011 None 2012 7% 2013 3-7% 4 6 /12/2013 ..: ••,y--�"='hi Metrolink Update • Continuing Agency Reorganization — New CEO, Michael DePallo — Changes Interim CFO, Finance, Communication, Procurement, etc. • Positive Train Control on SB Line 2013 • Financial Concerns: invoicing • Expanded Safety Program (Smarty) • 5th Peak IEOC added last year = 11 percent line growth • Friday night IEOC Angels Trains continue • TAP Enabled Tickets • _, Tip ALERT FRAME AGENDA ITEM 11 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T / O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 3 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : Q u a l i t y o f L i f e / S u s t a i n a b i l i t y A d H o c C o m m i t t e e A a r o n H a k e , G o v e r n m e n t R e l a t i o n s M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : F e d e r a l a n d S t a t e L e g i s l a t i v e U p d a t e Q U A L I T Y O F L I F E / S U S T A / N A B / L / T Y A D H O C C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e a n u p d a t e o n s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l l e g i s l a t i v e a c t i v i t i e s ; 2 ) A d o p t t h e f o l l o w i n g p o s i t i o n s o n s t a t e l e g i s l a t i o n : a ) A B 3 7 ( P e r e a ) - S u p p o r t ; b ) A B 4 0 1 ( D a l y ) - S u p p o r t ; c �% A B 4 9 3 ( D a l y ) - S u p p o r t ; d ) A B 5 4 3 ( C a m p o s ) - O p p o s e ; e ) A B 7 5 6 ( M e l e n d e z ) - S u p p o r t i f A m e n d e d ; f ) S B 7 7 8 ( C o m m i t t e e o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n & H o u s i n g ) S u p p o r t ; 3 ) R e v i s e t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s p o s i t i o n o n t h e f o l l o w i n g s t a t e l e g i s l a t i o n : a ) A B 1 7 9 ( B o c a n e g r a ) - N e u t r a l ; a n d b ) A B 5 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l ) - S u p p o r t i f A m e n d e d . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : F e d e r a l U p d a t e N e w U . S . D O T S e c r e t a r y N o m i n a t e d T h e P r e s i d e n t n o m i n a t e d A n t h o n y F o x x , t h e m a y o r o f C h a r l o t t e , N o r t h C a r o l i n a , t o b e t h e n e x t U . S . S e c r e t a r y o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n . I f c o n f i r m e d b y t h e S e n a t e , M a y o r F o x x w i l l s u c c e e d o u t g o i n g S e c r e t a r y R a y L a H o o d , w h o h a s b e e n i n s t r u m e n t a l i n a s s i s t i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n r e c e i v i n g a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I n f r a s t r u c t u r e F i n a n c e a n d I n n o v a t i o n A c t ( T I F I A ) l o a n f o r t h e S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 C o r r i d o r I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t . T h e W h i t e H o u s e t o u t e d M a y o r F o x x ' s t r a c k r e c o r d i n s u c c e s s f u l l y b r e a k i n g g r o u n d o n C h a r l o t t e ' s f i r s t s t r e e t c a r p r o j e c t a n d e x p a n d i n g t h e c i t y ' s r e l a t i v e l y n e w l i g h t r a i l s y s t e m a n d i n t e r n a t i o n a l a i r p o r t . F o x x f a c e d t h e S e n a t e C o m m i t t e e o n C o m m e r c e , S c i e n c e , a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n f o r a c o n f i r m a t i o n h e a r i n g o n M a y 2 2 . S e v e r a l n e w s o u t l e t s c o m m e n t e d o n h o w u n e v e n t f u l t h i s h e a r i n g w a s , c o m p a r e d t o A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 2 4 5 many other recent Presidential appointments that have created partisan sideshows. Given the low-key and bipartisan nature of Foxx's hearing, it is widely expected he will soon be easily confirmed on the Senate floor. The Commission looks forward to working with the new Secretary upon his arrival at U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), continuing the relationship the Commission developed with the Office of the Secretary over the last few years. House Transportation Committee Holds Hearing in San Bernardino Chairman of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, Representative Bill Shuster (R-PA), formed a special panel on "21' Century Freight Transportation" to study goods movement issues. The panel is chaired by Representative John Duncan, Jr. (R-TN). This panel is an early building block of the Chairman's effort to reauthorize and enhance the policy in MAP-21, which expires in September 2014. The panel held an initial roundtable in Washington, DC, with the Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. DOT on "Coordinating Federal Efforts to Improve Freight Transportation". Next the panel will visit Southern California for a roundtable discussion at the Port of Los. Angeles. Then, the panel will head inland for a tour of rail facilities in San Bernardino County and an informational hearing at San Bernardino Associated Governments. Oral testimony will be given by Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Executive Director Hasan Ikhrata, and Mobility 21 Executive Director Marnie O'Brien Primmer. The Commission is a member of both organizations. The Commission will also submit written testimony to the panel for the official record. Senator Feinstein Pushes for Goods Movement Funding Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced Senate Amendment 838 (S.AMDT.838) on May 8, which proposed language to the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) that would provide federal grant funding to inland goods movement projects on corridors related to certain "donor" ports. Within WRDA is authorization for the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund (HMTF) and the associated Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) paid by the maritime industry for the dredging of ports across the nation. The HMT is a complex and much -debated issue. The HMTF has historically held surplus balances exceeding $7 billion at the end of FFY 2011/12. Much as California has been a "donor state" in terms of federal gas tax revenue (the state gets back less than it sends to Washington, DC), so it also goes for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Senator Feinstein's amendment would have authorized a grant program funded by the HMTF for land -side infrastructure improvements that mitigate the impacts of goods movement through donor ports. This language would have created a new federal funding source for grade separations in the Inland 'Empire, one of the Commission's top federal • • • Agenda Item 11 246 " " " p r i o r i t i e s . S e n a t o r F e i n s t e i n ' s s t a f f i m m e d i a t e l y r e a c h e d o u t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r s u p p o r t . C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f a u t h o r e d a l e t t e r o f s u p p o r t f o r S . A M D T . 8 3 8 ( a t t a c h e d ) , g i v e n t h e a m e n d m e n t w a s s t r o n g l y a l i g n e d w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a d o p t e d f e d e r a l l e g i s l a t i v e p l a t f o r m , w h i c h s t a t e s : " C o n g r e s s s h o u l d a p p r o v e i n c r e a s e d f e d e r a l f u n d i n g f o r A l a m e d a C o r r i d o r E a s t i m p r o v e m e n t s w i t h a s p e c i a l e m p h a s i s o n e n s u r i n g f u n d i n g f o r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y h i g h w a y / r a i l g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n s . " U l t i m a t e l y , S . A M D T . 8 3 8 w a s n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h e f i n a l p a c k a g e o f a m e n d m e n t s a p p r o v e d o n t h e S e n a t e f l o o r . N o n e t h e l e s s , s t a f f b e l i e v e s S e n a t o r F e i n s t e i n ' s e f f o r t t o m o v e l e g i s l a t i o n t h a t w o u l d d i r e c t l y b e n e f i t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y c o m m u n i t i e s t h a t a r e i m p a c t e d b y g o o d s m o v e m e n t d e s e r v e s r e c o g n i t i o n a n d e n c o u r a g e m e n t t o c o n t i n u e p r e s s i n g t h e i s s u e . B u y A m e r i c a R e q u i r e m e n t s T h r e a t e n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o j e c t s N a t i o n w i d e A s r e p o r t e d i n M a y , i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f n e w B u y A m e r i c a r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r u t i l i t y r e l o c a t i o n s r e s u l t e d i n a t h r e e - w a y i m p a s s e b e t w e e n U . S . D O T , u t i l i t y c o m p a n i e s , a n d p r o j e c t s p o n s o r s s u c h a s t h e C o m m i s s i o n . M A P - 2 1 e x p a n d e d t h e a p p l i c a b i l i t y o f B u y A m e r i c a r e q u i r e m e n t s t o a l l c o n t r a c t s o n f e d e r a l - a i d e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t s . M a n y u t i l i t y c o m p a n i e s t h r o u g h o u t C a l i f o r n i a a n d t h e n a t i o n c o n t i n u e t o r e f u s e t o s i g n u t i l i t y r e l o c a t i o n a g r e e m e n t s w i t h B u y A m e r i c a p r o v i s i o n s . T h i s i s s u e r e s u l t e d i n t h e d e l a y o f s e v e r a l C a l i f o r n i a p r o j e c t s a l r e a d y , w i t h m a n y m o r e o n t h e h o r i z o n . B u y A m e r i c a i s t h e f i r s t p r i o r i t y i s s u e f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n W a s h i n g t o n , D C a t t h i s t i m e . S t a f f w i l l p r o v i d e a n o r a l r e p o r t o n t h e s t a t u s o f t h e s e e f f o r t s , ' a s t h e s i t u a t i o n r e m a i n s q u i t e f l u i d . S t a t e U p d a t e C E Q A L e g i s l a t i o n L i v e s a n d D i e s i n S a c r a m e n t o T h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s n u m b e r o n e l e g i s l a t i v e p r i o r i t y i n 2 0 1 3 i s m o d e r n i z a t i o n o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( C E Q A ) . T h e C o m m i s s i o n e x p r e s s e d c o n c e r n s a b o u t t h e e a s e w i t h w h i c h p r o j e c t o p p o n e n t s c a n s t a l l p r o j e c t s , e x p e n d p u b l i c f u n d s , a n d o p e r a t e w i t h o u t t r a n s p a r e n c y - e v e n o n p r o j e c t s w i d e l y v i e w e d a s h a v i n g g r e a t b e n e f i t t o t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a n d q u a l i t y o f l i f e . O u t o f a d e s i r e t o c u r b a b u s e s o f C E Q A a n d t o d e m o n s t r a t e t o t h e v o t e r s o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t h a t t h e v o t e r s ' t r a n s p o r t a t i o n t a x d o l l a r s a r e b e i n g e x p e n d e d e f f i c i e n t l y , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a c t i v e l y e n g a g e d i n t h e C E Q A d e b a t e i n S a c r a m e n t o . A s r e p o r t e d i n M a r c h , o v e r t w o d o z e n b i l l s w e r e i n t r o d u c e d i n t h e L e g i s l a t u r e p e r t a i n i n g t o C E Q A . D e a d l i n e s h a v e p a s s e d f o r b i l l s t o b e h e a r d i n c o m m i t t e e s i n t h e i r h o u s e o f o r i g i n ; d e a d l i n e s a r e u p c o m i n g f o r b i l l s t o b e m o v e d o f f t h e f l o o r i n t o A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 2 4 7 their second house. In monitoring these bills move through the process, staff highlights the following CEQA bills in four general categories: exemptions, new requirements, judicial reform, and standards. Exemptions AB 417 (Frazier) This bill exempts bicycle transportation plans in urbanized areas from CEQA. The genesis of the bill is San Francisco's 2005 bicycle transportation plan and network improvement document, which was challenged in court for noncompliance with CEQA. The plaintiffs argued that a CEQA analysis should have been done for each individual bike project contained within the citywide master plan. After five years of litigation, an appellate court ruled in San Francisco's favor. AB 417 sailed through the Assembly and awaits hearing in the Senate. The Sierra Club is opposed to the bill. SB 525 (Ga/giani) Existing law provides a CEQA exemption for increases in passenger or commuter rail service on existing right of way, serving existing stations. This bill would ,add to this exemption, "A project by the San Joaquin County Regional Rail Commission and the High -Speed Rail Authority to improve the existing tracks, structure, bridges, signaling systems, and associated appurtenances located on the existing railroad right of way used by the Altamont Commuter Express." SB 525 has not yet had a committee hearing or vote and all applicable deadlines have lapsed for it to move this year without rule waivers. It is possible that this bill will be heard in 2014. SB 617 (Evans) This bill deletes existing CEQA exemptions for three prison facilities. The bill also expands CEQA noticing requirements by county clerks similar to AB 380 (Dickenson) described below. SB 617 redefines environment and significant effect on the environment to cover the health and safety of people due physical conditions at the location of a project and reasonably foreseeable natural hazards or environmental conditions. Further, the bill would allow project applicants to require lead agencies to prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of, CEQA documents. SB 617 cleared two committees on party -line votes and is currently on the Senate floor for consideration. • • Agenda Item 11 248 " " N e w R e q u i r e m e n t s A B 3 7 ( P e r e a ) S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n : S U P P O R T A s w i t h S B 6 1 7 , t h i s b i l l w o u l d a l l o w p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s t o r e q u i r e l e a d a g e n c i e s t o p r e p a r e a r e c o r d o f p r o c e e d i n g s c o n c u r r e n t l y w i t h t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f C E Q A d o c u m e n t s . T h i s h a s t h e p o t e n t i a l t o a c c e l e r a t e f u t u r e j u d i c i a l p r o c e e d i n g s b y g i v i n g b o t h s i d e s o f a C E Q A l a w s u i t t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o p r e p a r e f o r c o u r t . A B 3 7 i s s u p p o r t e d b y b u s i n e s s g r o u p s a n d i s c u r r e n t l y u n o p p o s e d , a w a i t i n g a v o t e o n t h e A s s e m b l y f l o o r . C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f e n c o u r a g e s a S u p p o r t p o s i t i o n o n t h i s b i l l . A B 3 8 0 ( D i c k i n s o n ) A s w i t h S B 6 1 7 , t h i s b i l l e x p a n d s C E Q A n o t i c i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s b y c o u n t y c l e r k s a n d t h e G o v e r n o r ' s O f f i c e o f P l a n n i n g a n d R e s e a r c h ( O P R ) . B o t h O P R a n d c o u n t y c l e r k s w o u l d b e r e q u i r e d t o p o s t a n u m b e r o f n e w i t e m s o n a n o n l i n e d a t a b a s e f o r p u b l i c r e v i e w w i t h i n o n e d a y o f t h e n o t i c e s b e i n g r e c e i v e d . N o t i c e s t h a t m u s t b e p o s t e d i n c l u d e : d e c i s i o n s m a d e b y s t a t e r e g u l a t o r y a g e n c i e s , s c o p i n g m e e t i n g s , p r e p a r a t i o n o f a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t r e p o r t ( E I R ) o r n e g a t i v e d e c l a r a t i o n , c o m p l e t i o n o f a n E I R , a n d p r o j e c t a p p r o v a l . A B 3 8 0 a u t h o r i z e s O P R t o c o l l e c t a $ 1 0 f e e f r o m a g e n c i e s f i l i n g a n o t i c e a n d a u t h o r i z e s a g e n c i e s t o r e c o v e r t h a t f e e f r o m a p p l i c a n t s . T h e b i l l i s o n t h e A s s e m b l y f l o o r a w a i t i n g a v o t e . T h e b i l l i s o p p o s e d b y A s s o c i a t i o n o f C a l i f o r n i a W a t e r A g e n c i e s ( A C W A ) a n d t h e R u r a l C o u n t y R e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o f C a l i f o r n i a . A w i d e a r r a y o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l a d v o c a c y g r o u p s s u p p o r t s A B 3 8 0 . A B 5 4 3 ( C a m p o s ) S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n : O P P O S E T h i s b i l l w o u l d r e q u i r e a l e a d a g e n c y t o t r a n s l a t e a l l n o t i c e s , d o c u m e n t s , a n d s u m m a r i e s p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o a C E Q A p r o c e s s i n t o a l l l a n g u a g e s u n d e r s t o o d b y a s u b s t a n t i a l n u m b e r o f r e s i d e n t s i n t h e a r e a w h e r e t h e p r o j e c t i s t o b e l o c a t e d . T h e b i l l q u a l i f i e s a s u b s t a n t i a l n u m b e r i s 2 5 p e r c e n t o f t h e p o p u l a t i o n . T h e p r o j e c t a r e a i s n o t s p e c i f i c a l l y d e f i n e d . A s s e m b l y A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e a n a l y s i s o f A B 5 4 3 p r o v i d e s s o m e s t a r t l i n g i n f o r m a t i o n : " T r a n s l a t i o n o f d o c u m e n t s i n t o m u l t i p l e l a n g u a g e s p o s e s u n k n o w n c o s t s t o t h e s t a t e a n d l e a d a g e n c i e s , p o s s i b l y i n t h e m i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s ; a n d " I t i s u n k n o w n w h e t h e r d e m o g r a p h i c i n f o r m a t i o n e x i s t s t o a c c u r a t e l y d e t e r m i n e w h e r e p o p u l a t i o n s e x i s t o f 5 p e r c e n t o r g r e a t e r t h a t s p e a k a d i f f e r e n t l a n g u a g e . A b s e n t t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n , a g e n c i e s m a y h a v e t o r e s o r t t o a d e f a u l t p o s i t i o n o f a u t o m a t i c a l l y t r a n s l a t i n g a l l d o c u m e n t s i n t o n u m e r o u s l a n g u a g e s t o g u a r a n t e e c o m p l i a n c e w i t h C E Q A . A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 2 4 9 AB 543 passed through committees on party -line votes and currently is on the Assembly floor awaiting a vote. The bill is widely supported by environmental groups and opposed by business and industry groups. Commission staff encourages an Oppose position on this bill. Judicial Reform AB 756 (Melendez) Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT IF AMENDED Local Assembly Member Melissa Melendez introduced legislation to add public works projects to a special law passed in 2011 to streamline judicial proceedings for CEQA lawsuits. The Commission and other transportation advocates feverishly attempted to include public works projects in the original law, which instead focused on private development with certain specified economic benefits. AB 756 goes a significant way towards remedying the Legislature's omissions. The Commission always maintained that transportation projects provide economic benefits ranging from job creation to construction to increased commercial activity due to increased mobility of people and goods. Moreover, many transportation projects have positive impacts on the environment, especially public transit projects such as bus or rail facilities. Under AB 756, eligible entities for this judicial fast - tracking are cities, counties, special districts, state or private entities contracted by state or local government. Transportation related projects are eligible under this bill, which names the following as examples: "construction and maintenance of roads, bridges, airports, and ports, and the placement of traffic signs and street lights." - For clarity, the Commission requested the bill's eligibility list be amended to explicitly mention list regional transportation agencies and transit projects. While, arguably, the Commission could be considered a special district, state law establishes the Commission and its sister agencies in a unique section of the Public Utilities Code. Additionally, existing state law is particular about how public transit is defined. AB 756 has not yet had a hearing or vote. Given legislative rules, it must wait until 2014 to be brought up again. Additionally, according to the Commission's legal counsel, the 2011 law that AB 756 seeks to amend has recently been ruled unconstitutional. Nonetheless, with the many CEQA modernization efforts afoot in the Capitiol, staff believes it is important to encourage Legislation that moves in a positive direction such as this bill by a local author. If the bill can be amended to clarify the Commission's eligibility to use streamlined judicial process for public transit projects, staff recommends a Support if Amended position. • • Agenda Item 11 250 " A B 5 1 5 ( D i c k i n s o n ) T h i s b i l l w o u l d c r e a t e t w o C E Q A c o m p l i a n c e c o u r t s c o n s i s t i n g o f t h r e e j u d g e s e a c h . T h i s C E Q A c o u r t w o u l d b e r e q u i r e d t o p r o v i d e s p e c i f i c a c t i o n s t h a t m u s t b e t a k e n b y p u b l i c a g e n c i e s t o c o m p l y w i t h t h e c o u r t ' s o r d e r . P e t i t i o n e r s w o u l d b e r e q u i r e d t o e x h a u s t a l l a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e m e d i e s f i r s t , g i v i n g p u b l i c a g e n c i e s t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o r e a s o n a b l y r e s p o n d t o a l l e g e d v i o l a t i o n s . A B 5 1 5 d i d n o t h a v e a p o l i c y c o m m i t t e e h e a r i n g o r v o t e p r i o r t o A s s e m b l y d e a d l i n e s ; t h e r e f o r e t h e b i l l w i l l n e e d t o w a i t u n t i l 2 0 1 4 t o b e h e a r d . S B 1 2 3 ( C o r b e t t ) T h i s b i l l w o u l d r e q u i r e t h e J u d i c i a l C o u n c i l t o c r e a t e a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d l a n d u s e d i v i s i o n t o h a n d l e C E Q A c a s e s w i t h i n a t l e a s t t w o s u p e r i o r c o u r t s i n e a c h a p p e l l a t e d i s t r i c t s o f t h e s t a t e . T h e c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h c r e a t i n g t h e s e n e w e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d l a n d u s e d i v i s i o n s w o u l d b e f u n d e d b y a $ 1 0 f e e i n c r e a s e f o r s p e c i a l e n v i r o n m e n t a l l i c e n s e p l a t e s . S B 1 2 3 d i d n o t s u r v i v e t h e S e n a t e A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e . S t a n d a r d s " A B 1 3 0 2 ( H a g m a n ) a n d S B 7 8 7 ( B e r r y h i l l ) " T h e s e i d e n t i c a l b i l l s w o u l d i n s t i t u t e t h e s t a n d a r d s a p p r o a c h t h a t w a s t h e b a s i s o f l a s t y e a r ' s l a t e p u s h f o r C E Q A r e f o r m . I n s h o r t , t h e s e b i l l s p r o v i d e t h a t p r o j e c t s t h a t c o n f o r m w i t h e x i s t i n g s t a t e o r f e d e r a l s t a n d a r d s a r e a l s o c o m p l i a n t w i t h C E Q A . T h e t h r u s t o f t h i s l e g i s l a t i o n i s t o e n s u r e p r o j e c t s i n u r b a n a r e a s t h a t a r e d r i v e n b y n e w s t a t e l a w s s u c h a s A B 3 2 a n d S B 3 7 5 a r e a b l e t o c o m e t o f r u i t i o n . P r o j e c t s i n h i g h d e n s i t y a r e a s t h a t a r e t h e f o c u s o f g r e e n h o u s e g a s r e d u c t i o n l a w s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s a r e m o r e l i k e l y t o h a v e u n a v o i d a b l e s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s ; t h e b i l l a i m s t o r e m e d y t h e p o t e n t i a l c o n f l i c t s b e t w e e n t w o e x i s t i n g l a w s t h a t t h e s e p r o j e c t s m a y h a v e . B o t h b i l l s a r e t w o y e a r b i l l s , e l i g i b l e f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n a g a i n i n 2 0 1 4 . N e w N o n - C E Q A B i l l s R e c o m m e n d e d F o r C o m m i s s i o n A c t i o n A B 4 0 1 ( D a l y ) : D e s i g n - B u i l d f o r I n t e r s t a t e 4 0 5 i n O r a n g e C o u n t y S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n : S U P P O R T T h e O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( O C T A ) i s s p o n s o r i n g A B 4 0 1 t o a u t h o r i z e t h e u s e o f b e s t v a l u e d e s i g n - b u i l d f o r t h e 1 - 4 0 5 w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t . T h e l a n g u a g e o f t h i s b i l l i s n e a r l y i d e n t i c a l t o t h a t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s A B 2 0 9 8 ( M i l l e r ) , w h i c h w a s a p p r o v e d i n 2 0 1 0 . L i k e t h e S R - 9 1 C o r r i d o r I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t , t h e 1 - 4 0 5 p r o j e c t a l s o h a s a n e s t i m a t e d c o s t o f $ 1 . 3 b i l l i o n , a n d i s s i m i l a r A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 2 5 1 in length (12 miles). The project will add one general purpose lane in each direction. The Commission's adopted platform is strongly supportive of the expanded use of innovative project delivery methods such as design -build. Given this bill is modeled on the Commission's approach to SR-91 and OCTA has been historically supportive of the Commission's efforts in this regard, staff recommends adopting a support position on AB 401. It is important to note the bill has the official support of Professional Engineers in California Government (PECG), as well as the Orange County Business Council (OCBC), and Automobile Club of Southern California (AAA). AB 401 cleared the Assembly floor and is awaiting a policy committee assignment in the Senate Rules Committee. AB 493 fDa/y): Toll Facilities Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT Current state law requires all tolled facilities in California to utilize interoperable technologies for collecting tolls. Customers can purchase a transponder from any toll authority in the state and use it on any toll facility around the state and be billed to the same account. FasTrak is the common moniker for the transponder technology used in California. New federal surface transportation law, MAP-21, goes a step further by requiring national interoperability by July 6, 2016. The tolling industry is moving quickly to determine national standards to meet this congressional mandate. The California Toll Operators Committee (CTOC), ,of which the Commission is a member agency, is strategizing on how to ensure that California's voice is at the table in these nationwide discussions. AB 493 simply adds a provision to existing state statutes that authorizes Caltrans and toll operators such as the Commission to comply with the national interoperability goal of MAP-21 and deploy any business practices or technologies required to do so. This bill is important because in recent years the Legislature adopted new statutes governing how customer information is handled by tolling agencies. Specifically, AB 493 allows the following information to be shared for the purposes of a nationally interoperable toll infrastructure: license plate number, transponder identification number, date and time of transaction, and identity of the agency operating the toll facility. Staff recommends supporting this leeway in state law to ensure California is compliant with the eventual federal standards. • • Agenda Item 11 252 " " S B 7 7 8 ( C o m m i t t e e o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n & H o u s i n g ) : O m n i b u s B i l l S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n : S U P P O R T O c c a s i o n a l l y , t h e L e g i s l a t u r e w i l l p a c k a g e s e v e r a l n o n - c o n t r o v e r s i a l i t e m s i n t o o n e b i l l k n o w n a s a n " o m n i b u s " b i l l . S B 7 7 8 i s o n e s u c h b i l l . T h i s o m n i b u s i n c l u d e s l a n g u a g e f r o m a b i l l t h e C o m m i s s i o n s u p p o r t e d i n A p r i l , S B 3 3 7 ( E m m e r s o n ) , w h i c h r e l i n q u i s h e s S R - 7 4 t o t h e c i t y o f H e m e t . S t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r m a l l y s u p p o r t t h e o m n i b u s b i l l . O t h e r p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e b i l l i n c l u d e n o n - s u b s t a n t i v e t e c h n i c a l c o r r e c t i o n s t o e x i s t i n g l a w a n d d e l e t i o n o f o b s o l e t e p r o v i s i o n s s u c h a s t h e 1 9 8 4 O l y m p i c s s p e c i a l l i c e n s e p l a t e p r o g r a m . R e c o m m e n d e d R e v i s i o n s t o B i l l P o s i t i o n s P r e v i o u s l y A d o p t e d A B 1 7 9 ( B o g a n e g r a ) : E l e c t r o n i c T r a n s i t F a r e a n d T o l l C o l l e c t i o n P r i v a c y S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n : R e s c i n d O p p o s e P o s i t i o n a n d A d o p t N E U T R A L P o s i t i o n T h e C o m m i s s i o n a d o p t e d a n O p p o s e p o s i t i o n t o t h i s b i l l i n A p r i l . T h e p r i m a r y c o n c e r n w i t h t h e b i l l i s t h a t i t w o u l d h a v e c h a n g e d t h e l a w t o f o r c e t o l l a g e n c i e s t o p u r g e p e r s o n a l l y i d e n t i f i a b l e c u s t o m e r i n f o r m a t i o n f r o m t h e i r t o l l c o l l e c t i o n s y s t e m s w i t h i n s i x m o n t h s . H o w e v e r , t h e s t a t u t e o f l i m i t a t i o n s f o r c u s t o m e r s t o c h a l l e n g e t o l l v i o l a t i o n s i s f o u r a n d a h a l f y e a r s . T h i s i n c o n g r u i t y i n t h e l a w w o u l d h a v e l e f t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d o t h e r t o l l a g e n c i e s l e g a l l y v u l n e r a b l e t o c u s t o m e r c h a l l e n g e s a f t e r t h e i r d a t a h a d b e e n p u r g e d . H o w e v e r , o n A p r i l 2 4 , A s s e m b l y M e m b e r B o c a n e g r a a m e n d e d t h e b i l l t o r e t u r n t o a f o u r a n d a h a l f y e a r p e r i o d b e f o r e a g e n c i e s m u s t d e l e t e c u s t o m e r d a t a . T h e p r i m a r y i n t e r e s t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n t h i s b i l l i s n o l o n g e r a n i s s u e , t h e r e f o r e s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s d r o p p i n g o p p o s i t i o n t o t h e b i l l a n d g o i n g n e u t r a l . T h e b i l l s t i l l r e t a i n s p r o v i s i o n s r e l a t i n g t o c u s t o m e r i n f o r m a t i o n a t t a c h e d t o e l e c t r o n i c t r a n s i t f a r e s a n d s e c u r i t y c a m e r a s . T r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s w i l l n e e d t o c o n t i n u e t o w o r k w i t h M r . B o c a n e g r a o n t h e t r a n s i t e l e m e n t s o f t h e b i l l . C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f i s w i l l i n g t o a s s i s t l o c a l o p e r a t o r s w h e r e i t i s r e q u e s t e d . A B 5 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l ) : C a p - a n d - T r a d e R e v e n u e D i s t r i b u t i o n S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n : R e v i s e P o s i t i o n t o S U P P O R T I F A M E N D E D T h e C o m m i s s i o n s u p p o r t e d A B 5 7 4 i n A p r i l . A t t h a t t i m e t h e b i l l m a d e p o l i c y c h a n g e s t h a t w o u l d s t r e a m l i n e t h e p r o c e s s f o r c i t i e s a n d c o u n t i e s t o a p p l y t o t h e s t a t e t o a s s u m e l o c a l c o n t r o l o f s t a t e h i g h w a y s . I n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , t h e r e h a v e b e e n n u m e r o u s c i t i e s w h o h a v e a s k e d t h e s t a t e t o r e l i n q u i s h p o r t i o n s o f s t a t e h i g h w a y s s u c h a s S t a t e R o u t e s 7 4 , 7 9 a n d 1 1 1 . H o w e v e r , o n A p r i l 1 5 , A s s e m b l y M e m b e r B o n n i e L o w e n t h a l , c h a i r o f t h e A s s e m b l y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e , a m e n d e d t h e b i l l w h o l e s a l e . A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 2 5 3 Now, the bill proposes policy to guide the expenditure of the state's cap -and -trade program, which was authorized by AB 32 (Pavley, 2006) and is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Given that the transportation fuels sector will be subject to the cap -and -trade regime and will generate revenues, the Commission is concerned that state policy provides a fair share of revenues to transportation projects. Furthermore, cap -and -trade revenues are a logical source to fund implementation of SB 375 (Steinberg). SB 375 required a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) to be adopted as a component, of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) produced by the SCAG. SB 375 is an outgrowth of AB 32, which seeks to more closely tie land use and transportation decisions for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gasses (GHG) and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). SB 375 has heretofore been an unfunded mandate on regional governments and was opposed by the Commission largely for this reason. The cap -and -trade program provides an opportunity to capture revenue for alternative transportation projects that are likely to become more prevalent in future RTP/SCS's in order to meet the GHG reduction targets set by CARB, as well as the emissions standards set by the Clean Air Act that the region is required to meet. AB 574_ provides that cap -and -trade revenue will be distributed on a per capita basis to regional granting agencies, that are defined as the metropolitan planning agencies (in the case of Riverside County, that agency is SCAG). The bill directs the CARB to consult with the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and Strategic Growth Council (SGC) to develop standards and implementation guidelines for the regions to follow in spending the cap -and -trade funding. Funding must be awarded to projects on a competitive basis that includes an opportunity for public input. A variety of types of projects may receive funding according to the bill: • Trip -reduction programs, congestion pricing, and road modifications such as roundabouts; • Public transit operations, capital, and maintenance; • Road and bridge maintenance; • Road enhancements for pedestrian safety; • Clean fuel infrastructure; • Planning activities that reduce travel distances between jobs, schools, housing, parks, and markets; • Development of Local plans and land use policies to implement regional plans; • Infrastructure to support transit oriented development, affordable housing, infill projects, and walkable communities in rural areas; • Multiuse facilities that accommodate pedestrians, bikes, and neighborhood electric vehicles; and • Administrative costs for evaluation, monitoring, and verification systems. • • • Agenda Item 11 254 " " " T h e b i l l e m p h a s i z e s t h a t t h e p r o g r a m g u i d e l i n e s d e v e l o p e d b y C A R B m u s t " e n c o u r a g e f l e x i b i l i t y , c o l l a b o r a t i o n , a n d i n n o v a t i o n a t t h e l o c a l l e v e l t o d e v e l o p . c o s t - e f f e c t i v e p r o j e c t s a n d t o a d d r e s s l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d c o m m u n i t y n e e d s . " T h i s l a n g u a g e d e m o n s t r a t e s a p h i l o s o p h y t i l t e d t o w a r d s l o c a l d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g , w h i c h i s a k e y p r i n c i p l e i n t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a d o p t e d l e g i s l a t i v e p l a t f o r m . T h e a l t e r n a t i v e t o a b i l l s u c h a s A B 5 7 4 i s c o n t r o l o f e x p e n d i t u r e s b y t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i o n i n S a c r a m e n t o ( p r i m a r i l y A R B ) . H o w e v e r , C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f b e l i e v e s A B 5 7 4 m u s t g o f u r t h e r . R e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a g e n c i e s i n t h e S C A G r e g i o n h a v e r e a c h e d c o n s e n s u s o n a m e n d m e n t s t o A B 5 7 4 t h a t f u r t h e r d e v o l v e d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g a u t h o r i t y f o r c a p - a n d - t r a d e r e v e n u e s f r o m S C A G t o t h e c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n s o n a p e r c a p i t a b a s i s . G i v e n t h a t S C A G i s n o t a n a g e n c y t h a t i m p l e m e n t s p r o j e c t s , t h e r e g i o n f e l t i t w a s a p p r o p r i a t e t o d e s i g n a t e t h e c o u n t y c o m m i s s i o n s a s t h e g r a n t i n g a g e n c i e s t h a t s e l e c t p r o j e c t s . T h i s a p p r o a c h i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h n u m e r o u s o t h e r s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l f u n d s t h a t f l o w t h r o u g h S C A G t o t h e c o m m i s s i o n s f o r e x p e n d i t u r e . A d d i t i o n a l l y , c a p - a n d - t r a d e f u n d s a r e d e s t i n e d f o r p r o j e c t s t h a t a r e , b y t h e i r n a t u r e , v e r y l o c a l ; t h e r e f o r e s t a f f b e l i e v e s i t i s i m p o r t a n t t h a t d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o a r d s a s c l o s e t o t h e g r o u n d l e v e l a s p o s s i b l e t o m a k e f u n d i n g d e c i s i o n s . T h e a m e n d m e n t s t o A B 5 7 4 a r e p e n d i n g i n A s s e m b l y A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e a t t h e t i m e t h i s s t a f f r e p o r t w a s w r i t t e n . I f t h e a m e n d m e n t s s p e c i f i c t o t h e S C A G r e g i o n a r e a c c e p t e d , t h e n s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s a n u n q u a l i f i e d S u p p o r t p o s i t i o n f o r A B 5 7 4 . S t a f f r e c o g n i z e s t h e c o n t r o v e r s i a l n a t u r e o f c a p - a n d - t r a d e p o l i c y ; h o w e v e r , A B 3 2 i s t h e l a w i n C a l i f o r n i a a n d s u b s t a n t i a l r e v e n u e i s t o b e g e n e r a t e d . S t a f f b e l i e v e s t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h o u l d r e m a i n d i l i g e n t i n e n s u r i n g t h a t t h i s r e v e n u e i s s p e n t i n a m a n n e r t h a t s u p p o r t s t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s g o a l s . O t h e r L e g i s l a t i o n o f I n t e r e s t A B 5 ( A m m i a n o ) : H o m e l e s s B i l l o f R i g h t s S t a f f i s n o t r e c o m m e n d i n g a p o s i t i o n o n A B 5 a t t h i s t i m e . T h e b i l l h a s b e e n h e l d i n t h e A s s e m b l y A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e , m e a n i n g t h e b i l l w i l l n o t p r o g r e s s t h i s y e a r . N o n e t h e l e s s , t h e a u t h o r i n d i c a t e d h e w i l l c o n t i n u e w o r k i n g o n t h i s i s s u e . T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l w a n t t o m o n i t o r a n y f u t u r e e f f o r t s s i m i l a r t o A B 5 i n 2 0 1 4 . A B 5 w o u l d e s t a b l i s h t h e " H o m e l e s s P e r s o n ' s B i l l o f R i g h t s a n d F a i r n e s s A c t . " T h e b i l l g r a n t s a s e r i e s o f n e w p r o t e c t i o n s t o h o m e l e s s p e r s o n s a n d r e s t r i c t s l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t s f r o m e n f o r c i n g c e r t a i n o r d i n a n c e s p e r t a i n i n g t o r e s t i n g i n p u b l i c p l a c e s , s o l i c i t i n g , e a t i n g , p r a y i n g , a n d t r a s h c o l l e c t i o n , w h i l e a l s o g u a r a n t e e i n g s u c h p e r s o n s e x p a n d e d l e g a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n a n d c o n f i d e n t i a l i t y i n p u b l i c r e c o r d s . A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 2 5 5 The bill requires local governments to establish health and hygiene centers for use by homeless persons, and also mandates the collection of data regarding enforcement activities that homeless persons allege are selectively applied. The Commission owns and operates five Metrolink rail stations in Riverside County. Upon startup of the Perris Valley Line, four new stations will be added to the Commission's responsibilities, for a total of nine stations. These stations are public property and would be subject to AB 5. The bill overrides local policies by providing the following rights to homeless persons: 1. "The right to move freely in the same manner as any other person in public spaces without being subject to criminal or civil sanctions, harassment or arrest by law enforcement, public or private security personnel, or BID agents because he or she is homeless. 2. The right to rest in a public space in the same manner as any other person without being subject to criminal or civil sanctions, harassment, or arrest by law enforcement, public or private security personnel, or BID agents because he or she is homeless, as long as that rest does not maliciously or substantially obstruct a passageway. 3. The right to eat, share, accept, or give food or water in public spaces in the same manner as any other person without being subject to criminal or civil sanctions, harassment, or arrest by law enforcement, public or private security personnel; or BID agents because he or she is homeless. 4. The right to solicit donations in public spaces in the same manner as any other person without being subject to criminal or civil sanctions, harassment, or arrest by law enforcement, public or private security personnel, or BID agents because he or she is homeless." The Commission adopted a Code of Conduct for its stations, which include the following provisions, in excerpt: "PARKING: Station parking is for Train Passengers Only, unless otherwise specified. Park at your own risk: RCTC, Metrolink, and Amtrak are not responsible for theft of or damage to property. Utilize designated parking areas only. Violators are subject to tow at the vehicle owner's expense. Erratic or careless driving in station parking areas is prohibited. LOITERING: Use of this facility is limited to station patrons only. Loitering is strictly prohibited. • Agenda Item 11 256 " S O L I C I T A T I O N : S o l i c i t a t i o n o f a n y k i n d w i t h o u t p r i o r w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f s t a t i o n m a n a g e m e n t i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . A n y o t h e r u n a c c e p t a b l e b e h a v i o r t h a t c o n s t i t u t e s o r c a u s e s a n u i s a n c e , a d i s t u r b a n c e , o r h a r m o r a t h r e a t o f h a r m i s p r o h i b i t e d . F a i l u r e t o o b e y t h e s e g u i d e l i n e s o r t o c o m p l y w i t h l a w f u l a n d r e a s o n a b l e r e q u e s t s b y t h e S t a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t , P o l i c e o r S e c u r i t y w i l l r e s u l t i n y o u r b e i n g a s k e d t o l e a v e t h e s t a t i o n . I f y o u r e f u s e t o l e a v e , y o u m a y b e a r r e s t e d a n d p r o s e c u t e d f o r c r i m i n a l t r e s p a s s . " U n d e r A B 5 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o d e o f C o n d u c t w o u l d b e r e n d e r e d u n e n f o r c e a b l e . B a s e d o n t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s e x p e r i e n c e w i t h h o m e l e s s p e r s o n s a t i t s s t a t i o n s , t h e i n a b i l i t y t o e n f o r c e t h e C o d e p r e s e n t s a t h r e a t t o p a s s e n g e r s a f e t y a n d i n c r e a s e i n v a n d a l i s m a n d m a i n t e n a n c e c o s t s . P a r t i c u l a r l y a t t h e D o w n t o w n R i v e r s i d e S t a t i o n , t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s p r i v a t e s e c u r i t y s e r v i c e r e p o r t e d s i g n i f i c a n t p r o b l e m s c r e a t e d b y h o m e l e s s p e r s o n s , i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o : " H a r a s s m e n t o f p a s s e n g e r s v i a p a n h a n d l i n g a n d a g g r e s s i v e , o b s c e n e b e h a v i o r ; " F i r e s b e i n g l i t i n t h e r a i l r o a d r i g h t o f w a y ; " V a n d a l i s m o f p o r t a b l e r e s t r o o m s , e l e v a t o r s a n d o t h e r p r o p e r t y ; a n d " P u b l i c u r i n a t i o n a n d d e f e c a t i o n . C C T V c a m e r a s a t t h e s t a t i o n r e g u l a r l y c a p t u r e t h e s e t y p e s o f i n c i d e n t s , a n d m o r e . I n m a n y c a s e s , t h e s e i n c i d e n t s d e g r a d e t h e l e v e l o f s e r v i c e p r o v i d e d t o t h e p u b l i c w h e n f a c i l i t i e s a r e p l a c e d o u t o f o r d e r o r a r e a s m a d e i n a c c e s s i b l e . A l s o , i n m a n y c a s e s R i v e r s i d e P o l i c e a n d F i r e D e p a r t m e n t s a r e d i s p a t c h e d t o r e s p o n d . A B 5 w o u l d f u r t h e r h a m p e r t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a b i l i t y t o m a i n t a i n t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s s t a t i o n s f o r i t s i n t e n d e d p u r p o s e : t o p r o v i d e s a f e , r e l i a b l e c o m m u t e r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n t o t h e r e s i d e n t s o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . S t a f f i s s e n s i t i v e t o t h e d i f f i c u l t a n d c o m p l e x i s s u e s s u r r o u n d i n g h o m e l e s s n e s s . S t a f f i s o p e n t o w o r k i n g w i t h t h e c i t y o f R i v e r s i d e ' s H o m e l e s s T a s k F o r c e a n d o t h e r i n i t i a t i v e s ; h o w e v e r , s t a f f s t r o n g l y b e l i e v e s t h a t p u b l i c s a f e t y , p u b l i c s e r v i c e s a n d p u b l i c p r o p e r t y s h o u l d n o t b e f u r t h e r c o m p r o m i s e d a s i t p e r t a i n s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n s . A B 5 i s o p p o s e d b y m a n y c i t i e s a n d b u s i n e s s g r o u p s , i n c l u d i n g t h e L e a g u e o f C a l i f o r n i a C i t i e s a n d t h e C a l i f o r n i a C h a m b e r o f C o m m e r c e . T h e b i l l ' s s p o n s o r s a r e t h e W e s t e r n C e n t e r o n L a w a n d P o v e r t y a n d t h e W e s t e r n R e g i o n a l A d v o c a c y P r o j e c t . T h e A m e r i c a n C i v i l L i b e r t i e s U n i o n ( A C L U ) a l s o s u p p o r t s t h e b i l l , i n a d d i t i o n t o s e v e r a l d o z e n o t h e r o r g a n i z a t i o n s s u c h a s O c c u p y S a c r a m e n t o , t h e C a l i f o r n i a N u r s e s A s s o c i a t i o n , a n d C a l i f o r n i a H u n g e r A c t i o n C o a l i t i o n . A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 2 5 7 Attachments: 1) Legislative Matrix 2) Support Letter to Honorable Dianne Feinstein Dated May 8, 2013 Agenda Item 11 258 RIVERSA�������0NJTYl[R��NSPK�RTA0'���N��K�0UD�USSI���N' POSITION STATE AND FEDERAL LEGy��LA�'Y����— 0�a���' ��������� ����y ''����� .--, ����. I Formalizes creation of a State Freight Advisory Council and commits the state to authoring a State Freight Plan every 5 years, pursuant to Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 13. Noeo4.) (May SUPPORT April 13.2O13 Previous version reduced the amount oftime transportation agencies can retain personally identifiable customer information for electronically - collected highway tolls and transit fares, from 4.5 years tosix rnontho. Amendments extend the time period back to4.5 years, removing a conflict with the statute oflimitations during which customers can challenge tolls and fare charges, which is upto4 years. The bill also enacts new privacy provisions for electronic transit fare collection. Unknown impacts exist for transit operators RTA.' SunUne and K4etro|ink for future implementation ofelectronic fare systems.. In Senate. Read first tinno. To Conn. on RLS. for assignment. (May 24[ OPPOSE Quality of 1/&elSustaxnabJity Ad Hoc Committee /eon/n/nend*m' position: NEUTRAL April 13'2O13 Revised position pending: June /2'2O/3 Extends by an additional 10yearo a pilot program previously opposed by RCTC. Ultra -low emission vehicles (mostly electric cars) are exempted from paying tolls on tolled facilities, except for toll projects in L.A. County. This bill represents state mandate that cuts into local, revenue for infrastructure that local governments are providing to the state. This policy erodes the user -pay concept inherent in many areas oftransportation finance. This bill represents current and future threat to the viability of innovative infrastructure financing in California as }ovv'erniooion vehicles become more popular. The pilot program has only been in existence for less than one year. In Senate, Read first time. To Conn. on RLS. forassignment. SUPPORT April 13'2013 AB 487 (Linder) Requires government employees participating inthe DK4Vconfidentiality program to provide a workplace address so that parking' toll, and traffic violations can still be enforced. Two-year bill (can be reconsidered in 2014) SUPPORT Aoh| 13'2013 Formerly, this bill reformed the process bywhich cities and counties apply tothe State for relinquishment of state highways to local jurisdictions. The bill has been amended in its entirety. The bill now proposes policy toguide the expenditure the otate'o cap -and -trade program, which was authorized by AB 32 (pav|ey' 2006) and is administered bythe California Air Resources Board (CARB). The bill provides for regional control of the expenditure of cap -and -trade funds. The Commission, along with SCA(3 and other transportation cornndooiono in Southern California have requested amendments that would direct cop'and'tradefunds to directly totransportation commissions rather than Metropolitan Planning Organizations (W1PC)'o} Held under submission in Assembly Appropriations Committee. (May SUPPORT Quality of 1/fe,Sustaahebility Ad Hoc Committee recommended position: SUPPORT if Amended April 13'2013 259 diKscri ia 05 l iti n Date of Board Adoption AB 1081 (Medina) Requires goods movement infrastructure projects and financing, options from the private sector to be included in the Governor's annually submitted 5-year infrastructure plan and international trade & investment strategy. On Assembly Floor. Read second time: Ordered to third reading. (May 28). SUPPORT Pending Commission action May 8, 2013 SB 337 (Emmerson) Relinquishes portions of SR-74 to the City of Hemet. The City of Hemet is the sponsor of this bill. This bill builds on previous legislation that authorized relinquishment of SR-74 to the Cities of Palm Desert, Perris, and Lake Elsinore. Hearing cancelled at request of author. This bill's language has been incorporated into SB 788, the Senate Transportation Omnibus Bill. SUPPORT April 13, 2013 SB 731 (Steinberg) Enacts modest changes to CEQA, mostly relating to private development. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 24). MON/TOR/WORK WITH AUTHOR April 13, 2013 AB 37 (Perea) This bill would allow would allow project applicants to require lead agencies to prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of CEQA documents. This has the potential to accelerate future judicial proceedings by giving both sides of a CEQA lawsuit the opportunity to prepare for court. AB 37 is supported by business groups and is currently unopposed, awaiting a vote on the Assembly floor, Read third time. Passed Assembly Floor. Ordered to the Senate. (May 28}. Quality of Life/Sustainabi/ity Ad Hoc Committee recommended position: SUPPORT Pending at June 12, 2013 meeting AB 401 (Day) Authorizes the use of best value design -build for the 1-405 widening project by OCTA. The language of this bill is nearly identical to that of the Commission's AB 2098 (Miller), which was approved in 2010. The project will add one general purpose lane in each direction. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. (May 24). Quality of Life/Sustainabi/ity Ad Hoc Committee recommended position: SUPPORT Pending at June 12, 2013 meeting AB 543 (Campos) • This bill would require a lead agency to translate, as specified, certain notices required by the act and a summary of any negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report when a group of non -English-speaking people, as defined, comprises at least 25% of the population within the lead agency's jurisdiction and the project is proposed to be located at or near an area where the group of non -English-speaking people comprises at Least 25% of the residents of that area. By requiring a lead agency to translate these As and documents, this bill would impose a state -mandated loc gram, Read second time and amended. (May 24) Orto third reading. (May 28). Quality of Life/Sustainabi/ity Ad Hoc Committee recommended position: OPPOSE Pending at June 12, 2013 meeting 110 AB 756 (Melendez) Allows public works projects to be granted Leadership designation by the Governor for the purposes of a 2011 law that provides expedited judicial review for CEQA challenges. The Commission seeks amendments that would clarify elgibility of regional transportation agencies (such as the Commission) to utilize this fast -tracking for public transit projects. Note: the underlying 2011 law has recently been ruled unconstitutional. Two-year bill (may be reconsidered in 2014) Quality of Life/Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee recommended position: SUPPORT if Amended D of Board pfion Pen ing at June 12, 2013 meeting SB 778 (Committee on Transportation & Housing) Senate "omnibus" bill of non -controversial items. This omnibus includes language from SB 337 (Emmerson), which relinquishes SR-74 to the city of Hemet. Other provisions of the bill include non -substantive technical corrections to existing law and deletion of obsolete provisions such as the 1984 Olympics special license plate program. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R. (March 11). Quality of Life/Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee recommended position: SUPPORT Pending at June 12, 2013 meeting AB 493 (Daly) This bill would authorize operators of toll facilities on federal -aid highways to fully implement technologies or business practices that provide for the interoperability of electronic toll collection programs on and after the date specified in MAP-21. The bill would Limit the information that may be disclosed through participation in an interoperability program, as specified. In Senate. Referred to Conn, on T. & H. (May 9). Quality of Life/Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee recommended position: Pending at June 12, 2013 meeting 261 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor • Riverside, CA 92501 Mailing Address: P. a Box 12008 • Riverside, CA 92502-2208 (951) 787-7141 • Fax (951) 787-7920 • www.rctc.org Riverside County TransportationCommission May 8, 2013 The Honorable Dianne Feinstein 331 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Subject: Support for Water Resources Development Act Amendment on Goods Movement Mitigation Funding Dear Senator Feinstein: The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) strongly supports your amendment to the Water Resources Development Act related to funding for capital projects that mitigate the local impacts of goods movement. Riverside County, situated in Southern California's Inland Empire along with San Bernardino County, is the crossroads for nearly all of the freight rail traffic and most of the truck traffic generated by the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. While freight -related industries are a major job creator for our region, they also create significant impacts to our communities, including severe highway and local road congestion, harmful emissions, and loss of economic 0e roductivity. RCTC proactively created a Grade Separation Funding Strategy to improve mobility, safety, and air quality our most critical rail crossings where the Union Pacific and BNSF rail lines bisect our county. Your amendment will 1p complete that aggressive funding strategy for improvements that are long overdue. Riverside County was the fastest growing county in California in the last Census period and is projected to become the second most populous county in California within the next few decades. Today, our 2.1 million residents bear the brunt of nearly half of the nation's imports moving through our neighborhoods, degrading our roadways, and inhibiting emergency access across major urban corridors. The federal government has a responsibility to fund projects that accommodate the continued growth of interstate commerce while protecting the viability of our communities and our economy. Thank you for your extraordinary leadership in introducing this amendment. Anne Mayer Executive Director cc: The Honorable Barbara Boxer MARK TAKANO J15; ?=sie. C41,,JFNIA COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE. AND TECHNOLOGY Congregg of the andel gotatefi otlte of reiicntatibeg filaftington, MC 20515 June 10, 2013 The Honorable Peter Rogoff Administrator, Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: Perris Valley Line Small Starts Grant Dear Administrator Rogoff DC OFFICE 1507 LONGWORTH HOUSE OFFICE B4.PN.DING WASNINu TON, DC 20515 t2021225-2305 I2021225-7019 f6x DISTRMT OFFICE. 3403101n ST., STE 610 R6a6st0E, CA 92501 051/222-0203 takana110us$.gov The Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension represents a significant step towards sustainable living in California's 41't Congressional District and I welcome the $75 million federal investment that has been appropriated by Congress for this project. As you may know, a California Superior Court Judge recently ordered decertification of the Perris Valley Line's environmental impact report (EIR) prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project's sponsor, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), has assured me that they are pursuing all options available to ensure that the Perris Valley Line ultimately moves forward to construction. I urge the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to take all actions necessary to preserve the $75 million that has been appropriated under the Small Starts program for Perris Valley Line during ongoing litigation. The Small Starts grant is an imperative piece of the total funding for the Perris Valley Line project and I encourage the FTA to ensure that the Perris Valley Line project remain eligible to receive the grant once CEQA litigation has concluded. Perris Valley Line provides critical regional connectivity to my constituents, particularly in the underserved cities of Perris and Moreno Valley, while connecting major job centers in Riverside and March Air Reserve Base. Thank you for FTA's continued support of Perris Valley Line and for working with ROTC to advance livability and mobility in California's 41s1 Congressional District. CC: The Honorable Dianne Feinstein The Honorable Barbara Boxer Sincerely, ,,.- 104444---- MARK TAKANO Member of Congress PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER R.0111,- , State & Federal Legislative Update Buy America RCTC • MAP-21 requires federal -aid projects to require "Buy America" on all contracts. — Expands Buy America to utility relocations. • Many utilities refusing to sign agreements with Buy America provisions. • Feds will not approve utility relocations w/o Buy America. • Projects in Jeopardy Across the Nation. 2 Buy America RCTC What are the impacts? • Marquee Projects in California: — Gerald Desmond Bridge - SR-91 CIP • State Bond Projects Grade Separations • SoCal Projects At -Risk of Delay: $13.7 billion • Riverside County impact: $1.5 billion • State total: HUGE! Buy America RCTC Getting to Yes • Strongly/urgently encourage utilities to communicate with U.S. DOT • Seek flexibility from Congress, U.S. DOT • Be Creative 4 Bills of Interest ROTC Digest Staff Recommendation AB 401 (Daly) SB 778 (Senate T&H Committee) Design -build for OCTA: Interstate 405 widening Omnibus bill: includes SR- SUPPORT 74 relinquishment to City of Hemet; previously supported by RCTC. SUPPORT 3 4117 yy x .Fn ' awed.60. CEQA Bills RC<TC Bill AB 37 (Perea) AB 543 (Campos) AB 756 (Melendez) Digest Staff Recommendation Allows administrative record to be prepared in anticipation of litigation — saves time and costs. Requires translation of OPPOSE CEQA docs into languages if >25Y of residents in project area speak a language other than English. Allows public works projects to use judicial fast - tracking law. SUPPORT SUPPORT IF AMENDED 7 Streamline process SUPPORT Establishes regional for relinquishing state grant program for highways to local cap -and -trade governments who revenue to fund ask for local control. transportation projects. Requires toll agencies OPPOSE Amendments allow to purge customer toll agencies to keep data w/in 6 months. customer data Conflicts w/statute of concurrent with limitations (4 years). statute of New privacy limitations. requirements for transit operators. 4