Loading...
07 July 10, 2013 CommissionCOMM-COMM-00027 RECORDS Rivet le County Transportation Commission MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, July 10, 2013 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside ib• COMMISSIONERS .46 Chair - Karen Spiegel Vice Chair - Marion Ashley Second Vice Chair - Daryl Busch Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside Jeff Stone, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Bob Botts / Deborah Franklin, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont -Joseph DeConinck / To Be Appointed, City of Blythe Ella Zanowic / Jeff Hewitt, City of Calimesa Mary Craton / Randy Bonner, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez / Eduardo Garcia, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Eugene Montanez, City of Corona Scott Matas / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / Ike Bootsma, City of Eastvale Larry Smith / Robert Youssef, City of Hemet Douglas Hanson / Ty Peabody, City of Indian Wells Glenn Miller / Michael Wilson, City of Indio Frank Johnston / Micheal Goodland, City of Jurupa Valley Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann / Wallace Edgerton, City of Menifee Tom Owings / Marcelo Co, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Kathy Azevedo, City of Norco Jan Harnik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat / Paul Lewin, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Al Landers, City of Perris Ted Weill / Scott Hines, City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar Basem Muallem, Governor's Appointee Comments are welcomed by the Commission. if you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 8:01 AM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Jennifer Harmon Subject: RCTC July Commission Agenda - 07.10.2013 Attachments: Conflict of Interest Form.pdf; Conflict of Interest Memo.pdf Importance: High Good Morning Commissioners: The July Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 10 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy this link: http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/iuly-10-2013.original.pdf In addition for your review is the attached conflict of interest memo and the form. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 8:09 AM To: Tara Byerly Subject: RCTC: July Commission Agenda - 07.10.2013 Importance: High Good Morning Commission Alternates: The July Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 10 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy this link: httu://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/iuly-10-2013.original.odf Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 Riverskle Counly Tranwortation (omission TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Office and Board Services Manager DATE: July 3, 2013 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest - Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda of July 10, 2013 The July 10, 2013 agenda of the Riverside County Transportation Commission includes items that may raise possible conflicts of interest. A Commissioner may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 9C - Amendment to Agreement with CH2M Hill to Complete the Final Project Report and Environmental Document for the State Route 79 Realignment Project Consultant(s) CH2M Hill, Inc. 1770 Iowa Street, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92501 Thomas Ionta, Vice President • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9: 30 a.m. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compfiance with the Brown Act and Government .Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2013 Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 12, 2013 6. PUBLIC HEARING - ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT AND/OR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN ALL OR PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 102-270-010; 102-092-001; 102-102-020; 102-040-015; 118-250-027 AND 118-250-028; 117-070-029; 117-111-001; 117-270-001; AND 117-270-009, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-007, 13-013, 13-014, 13-015, 13-016, 13-017, 13-018, 13-019, and 13-020, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement and/or Temporary Construction Easement Interests in All or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-270-010; 102-092-001; 102-102-020; 102-040-015; 118-250-027 and 118-250-028; 117-070-029; 117-111-001; 117-270-001 and 117-270-009; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP1, which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County Fine to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2013 Page 3 • 7. PUBLIC HEARING — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT SERVICES FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Page 150 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2013/14 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2013/14 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 13-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". 8. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS — The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR — All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 9A. FISCAL YEARS 2014-18 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Page 168 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 2014-18 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2013 Page 4 9B. 2009 MEASURE A MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT BASE YEAR APPROVAL • FOR CITY OF WILDOMAR Page 170 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year level for the city of Wildomar (Wildomar). 9C. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL TO COMPLETE THE FINAL PROJECT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FOR THE STATE ROUTE 79 REALIGNMENT PROJECT Page 173 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 02-31-043-08, Amendment No. 8 to Agreement No, 02-31-043-00, with CH2M Hill to complete the Final Environmental Impact Report/final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIR/FEIS) and project report for the SR-79 realignment project for a amount not to exceed $4,494,074; 2) Authorize the Chair; or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute amendments for non -cardinal changes to the scope of work up to a maximum contingency amount of $450,000 for a total amount not to exceed $31,742,166 (includes original contract and previous amendments of a contract value of $26,798,092) and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute non -funding agreements for the environmental clearance and design of the project. 9D. FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Page 253 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2013/14 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program recommended funding of $1,780,922. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2013 Page 5 9E. FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE BUSPOOL SUBSIDY FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUESTS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 257 1) Authorize payment of $1,645/month maximum subsidy per buspool for the period July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, to the existing Mira Loma, Riverside, and Riverside II buspools; and 2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. 9F. AUTO CENTER DRIVE STREET SIGNAL PROJECT TIED TO GRADE SEPARATION Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 263 1) Approve Agreement No. 13-24-148-00 with the city of Corona (Corona) for the installation of a traffic signal at the northerly driveway of the West Corona Station and Auto Center Drive; 2) Authorize the , Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Allocate $235,865 in 2009 Measure A Western County Rail funds to Corona in support of the traffic signal. 10. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN — BENEFITS/OBLIGATIONS Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Page 271 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2013 Page 6 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 12. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. • Report on the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Rail Conference 2013, by Commissioners Daryl Busch, Greg Pettis, Ron Roberts, and Karen Spiegel. 13. CLOSED SESSION 13A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Case Nuinber(s): RIC 1113896 and RIC 10024161 14. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting and is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, August 14, 2013, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. �1 DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: CHECK IF PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: �k SUBJECT OF AGENDA REM: NAME: e.avAJry e edroo` PHONE NO.: 95/- l es ADDRESS: cJ s/ v c. ,er 4), /er Al I/ 19,_ REPRESENTING: PHONE NO.: NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET CITY ZIP CODE DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: 07 i0 CHECK IF SUBJECT OF ) s I G P PUBLIC COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: 1 (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) / NAME: b SUBJECT OF AGENDA ITEM: t1✓ Pit i' 5aff ADDRESS: 4050 L t° m() N STREET REPRESENTING: plticeN5(.. PHONEZ.: CITY ZIP CODE kc-A Vice cfith o PHONE NO.: NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP / BUSINESS ADDRESS: (010 Pi iOesit fige STREET CITY ZIP CODE DATE: DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD /9/'1013 CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: ❑ PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: SUBJECT OF l(AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) 9 AGENDA ITEM• � ev air NAME: p 1,4d, t.- �P, PHONE NO.: l ✓ ADDRESS: / 7 s1 /e/ lJ� �� � STREET CITY ZIP CODE REPRESENTING: PHONE NO.: NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET CITY ZIP CODE DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: 3L: 11 10 CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: O PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: �(Z) (4) SUBJECT OF (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) AGENDA ITEM: �!!v Co-b4 %Z 7- 2- NAME: 611g Y .SPEhCE'f-z PHONE NO.: ADDRESS: O( 906) rA tOt 4,3De, Ue o g2G1J/ STREET CITY U ZIP CODE REPRESENTING: Q/{y fa/Of L1S4-7 rime OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: � `D �b�`i` UY/}%ti1Z�tT�a` STREET D/ pi ^^ zaS CITY ZIP CODE cvo 3 vz PHONE NO.: Sri X RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL JULY10,2013 Present Absent County of Riverside, District I � 0 County of Riverside, District II Z 0 County of Riverside, District III OPr County of Riverside, District IV Ja'' 0 County of Riverside, District V J2r. O City of Banning ,r f 0 City of Beaumont 0 City of Blythe J2". 0 City of Calimesa 12r. O City of Canyon Lake O City of Cathedral City O fi3# City of Coachella 2' 0 City of Corona J2r 0 City of Desert Hot Springs .2r 0 City of Eastvale J2' 0 City of Hemet J7r 0 City of Indian Wells J71' 0 City of Indio .12r 0 City of Jurupa Valley ,c2' O City of La Quinta J2' 0 City of Lake Elsinore 2 .' O City of Menifee 0 City of Moreno Valley 0 City of Murrieta 0 X City of Norco .17r 0 City of Palm Desert P:0 City of Palm Springs � O City of Perris J'� 0 City of Rancho Mirage 0 0 City of Riverside 2r 0 City of San Jacinto 7r 0 City of Temecula 21/ 0 City of Wildomar ,2r 0 Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SIGN -IN SHEET J U LY 10, 2013 ' AGENCY EMAIL ADDRESS ✓2/�/71E iree,•/. ►�— 6 5 L. b ,,S,j 73 g�� !Ai, �� t..r_24, 06 t•- OM OwiNbs gi /4t[.Gt & kw.- i K �i4) / A �/IAAt.a /� 0 R Co f-/ 4 4Girts-iovA j IAAu Ihdle y / /r G ©4J i C.; �2 t .4�'�A- ,J e ./J i _5 '%—f !'I C:;1- 4- %71') eet-A A-4,-, �� �r " % ✓Z Sf sEN4 NI U Zu,E wi c-A-GTR.44 S `e d 1 I L1/4.-_-,---7 A 1 v c -ir 1 ..Si . S— Yk, Az ' -e--de _- c�.-e:22i)_--e-S %:=V,t27-,6'e-5 .%s. j)/5. �C1 6•fr r-2ti 6 s-r evc- 4fi AN��/ JEk 1 AL- ��12� -- y( � L,e-,e,�a,---- l J / .�L ). \. ) / cxs--) � .7.) i :,, ,-1 (�1' _ c � t_, wvv/ ' . �A Jr L' ��a � � `� �� � �' f,, -<e 5 ''- '77- 7 .: rig-- � f '<e_,.,.y, ,/.9�� ______SplifiLtiS CQ to ‘ 41 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MINUTES Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Karen Spiegel at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Steve Adams led the Commission in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Steve Adams Marion Ashley Roger Berg Ben Benoit John J. Benoit Bob Botts Daryl Busch Mary Craton Joseph DeConinck, Rick Gibbs Berwin Hanna Douglas Hanson Jan Harnik Terry Henderson Steven Hernandez Kevin Jeffries *Arrived after the meeting was called to order 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Frank Johnston Andrew Kotyuk Bob Magee Scott Mann Scott Matas Glenn Miller Tom Owings Greg Pettis Syed Raza Ron Roberts Adam Rush Karen Spiegel John F. Tavaglione* Ted Weill Ella Zanowic Commissioners Absent Ginny Foat Larry Smith Jeff Stone Anne Mayer, Executive Director, presented Gina Gallagher, Senior Staff Analyst, with a 5-year service award. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 2 Peter Benavidez, Chair of the Commission's Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), expressed there is a need for the Commission to recruit new CAC members to revitalize the CAC to a workable number. He expressed concern as the CEO of Blindness Support Services, a Measure A recipient, that all recipients of Measure A are required to provide a 35 percent match. He suggested the Commission consider evaluating the match requirements for Measure A funding and utilize the CAC's help as he believes the CAC is underutilized. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 8, 2013 SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETINGS M/S/C (Henderson/Craton) to approve the minutes as submitted. 6. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, presented the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14, and discussed the following areas: • Budget adjustments; • Budget summary; • Funding sources and comparison; • Summary of uses; • Management services; • Regional programs; • Capital program uses; • Capital projects and operations expenditures and highlights; • Functional uses breakdown; • Personnel - Commission action May 8, 2013; • Measure A management services; and • Final steps. Chair Spiegel announced the continuance of the public hearing from the May 8 meeting and requested comments from the public at this time. No comments were received from the public and the Chair closed the public hearing. Chair Spiegel then requested comments from the Commissioners. Commissioner Kevin Jefferies reiterated his opposition will not be reflective of the projects the Commission is undertaking and the quality of work being done. He expressed it is his dispute with the generous pay increases being offered to some employees and will maintain a no vote. At this time, Commissioner John Tavaglione joined the meeting. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 3 Chair Spiegel commended Michele Cisneros for a thorough presentation and budget document. Chair Spiegel expressed the Commission is a very unique organization when the ratio of project costs to staff is considered and staff has done an exceptional job. She discussed cost comparisons between the private sector and public sector salaries, which are very similar. She discussed the Commission's projects being delivered and quality of work by staff. Commissioner Terry Henderson stated she supports the Budget for FY 2013/14, however, she does not support toll roads. Commissioner Tom Owings concurred with Chair Spiegel's comments and stated though he does not agree with the analysis of public versus private sector jobs. However, he believes performance versus salary is important. He expressed the performance of this Commission and executive staff has been exemplary and he will fully support the salary increases and the Budget for FY 2013/14. M/S/C (Ashley/Berg) to: 1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14; and 3) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2013/14. No: Jeffries 7. PUBLIC HEARING — ADOPTION OF THREE RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN ALL OR PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ACCESSOR PARCEL NOS. 102-020-044; 102-270-010; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, AND 117-270-013; LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Chair Spiegel noted there is a revision to Agenda Item 7. Chair Spiegel opened the public hearing and requested legal counsel explain the nature and scope of the hearing. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 4 Steve DeBaun, legal counsel, stated there is a revision to Agenda Item 7 and explained in detail the revisions. He explained the purpose of this hearing is for the Board to consider the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity 13-006, 13-010, and 13-01 1 for the acquisition of various real properties for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP). He stated at the conclusion of this hearing, the Board will be asked to adopt the resolutions of necessity and he listed the findings. He explained the purpose of this hearing is to consider the need for acquisition of the property and it is not to consider the value of the property. Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board, verified the proofs of mailing that certify the notices were sent to the property owners of said parcel numbers are on file at the Commission. Will Von Klug, Right of Way Manager, presented the resolutions of necessity for the SR-91 CIP, and discussed the following areas: • Four findings required by the Board; • Parcel 1 - Pearl Street Properties, LLC map and aerial view; • Attempts to negotiate acquisition; • Parcel 2 - Redevelopment Agency of the city of Corona property map and aerial view; • Attempts to negotiate acquisition; • Parcel 3 - Santiago Rodriguez property map and aerial view; • Attempts to negotiate acquisition; and • Next steps. In response to Commissioner Jeffries' request for clarification for the proximity of the Rodriguez property relative to the project, Will Von Klug replied the property parallels the freeway at Pearl Street. Jennifer Harmon stated on June 11 the Commission received a letter of objection from Newmeyer & Dillion LLP regarding the Rodriguez property, APN 117-270-002. This letter was distributed to the Commissioners. Chair Spiegel request clarification that Newmeyer & Dillion LLP requested the Commission proceed with the resolution of necessity and then the Commission received this letter of objection. Will Von Klug replied the Commission received a letter from Newmeyer & Dillion LLP, dated May 22, which stated its clients have agreed to waive the 45-day resolution notice requirement and to take the property to the Commission for the resolution of necessity public hearing on June 12, 2013. He explained his understanding that the objection Fetter from Newmeyer & Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 5 Dillion LLP, was sent to preserve the rights its clients may have in contesting the resolution of necessity. Anne Mayer explained the same legal representative who sent the letter received on June 11, sent the Commission the May 22 letter requesting the Commission to move forward to condemnation. She stated this is not uncommon to receive communication to preserve the property owner's rights going forward. She stated staff is recommending the Commission take this action today as staff will continue negotiations and attempt to settle these cases if the property owner is interested. In response to Commissioner Adam Rush's request for clarification that the Rodriguez property is a full take since the reconstruction of Pearl Street will encumber the entire property, Will Von Klug confirmed. Commissioner Terry Henderson asked since Corona Redevelopment Agency is located in the city of Corona, what legal basis does the Chair have to participate. Chair Spiegel replied she will abstain from this parcel only. Steve DeBaun replied there is no requirement for the Chair to abstain for the acquisition of a parcel within the jurisdiction of the member agency nor does it trigger a personal conflict of interest. Chair Spiegel called upon any persons with an interest in the property who wish to be heard on this matter. Chair Spiegel then called on any other persons who wish to be heard on this matter. There were no other requests to speak from the public. Chair Spiegel closed the public hearing. M/S/C (Henderson/J. Benoit) to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 6 b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; and 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-006, 13-010, and 13-011, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and 117-270-013; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. Abstain: Spiegel on Corona Redevelopment Agency APN 102-270-010 8. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There was a revision to Agenda Item 7, "Public Hearing Adoption of Four Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Permanent Access Easement, Permanent Utility Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in all or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-020-044; 117-270-002; 115-060-013, 115-060-015, 117-270-005, 117-270-007, and f 17-270-013, Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California ", as previously noted. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Kotyuk/Miller) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. Abstain: Benoit, Jeffries, and Tavaglione on Agenda Items 9A and 9F Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 7 Jennifer Harmon noted staff requests all of the Commission's consultants complete a disclosure for bid form and if any indicate a campaign contribution, the respective Commissioner(s) are notified in advance of the meeting. 9A. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES — AMENDMENT 1) Approve Agreement No. 07-31-164-07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 07-31-164-00, with Best Best & Krieger LLP (BBK) for additional legal services related to FY 2012/13 in the amount of $960,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 9B. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2013. 9C. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Adopt Resolution No. 13-009, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14". 9D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. 9E. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4 (Q4) 2012. 9F. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 1) Approve the recurring contracts for FY 2013/14; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 8 9G. AGREEMENT WITH NOSSAMAN, LLP FOR ON -CALL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR SERVICES — AMENDMENT 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-66-028-12, Amendment No. 9 to Agreement No. 06-66-028-00, for the on -call strategic partnership advisor services with Nossaman LLP (Nossaman) by extending the contract term of performance to March 9, 2018, and augmenting the agreement for an additional amount not to exceed $2.4 million plus a contingency of $240,000, for a total authorized contract value of $8,352,935; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required for the project. 9H. 2013 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Receive and file the 2013 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. 91. 2009 MEASURE A WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL ARTERIAL FUNDS — CITY OF PERRIS PROGRAMMING REQUEST 1) Approve. the request from the city of Perris (Perris) to program 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Regional Arterial funds in the amount of $2.3 million for the Harley Knox Boulevard widening project from Patterson Avenue to Perris Boulevard; 2) Approve Agreement No. 13-72-144-00 with Perris for Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funding for the construction phase; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 9J. 2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS Approve the release of the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects for approximately $116 million of federal funding and $35 million of 2009 Western Riverside County Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funds. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 9 9K. FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 2013 CALL FOR REHABILITATION PROJECTS - ADDITIONAL PROJECT PROGRAMMING Approve programming federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds for rehabilitation projects in the amount of $1,268,000 as presented. 9L. 2009 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 1) Approve the 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year level of $937,007 for the city of La Quinta (La Quinta) beginning with FY 2013/14; 2) Split Measure A revenues on a 50/50 basis between the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and La Quinta, until such time La Quinta reimburses CVAG for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) fees CVAG would have received from La Quinta if La Quinta had joined the TUMF program when the TUMF was established; and 3) Allocate La Quinta's share of Measure A local streets and roads funds starting in July 2013, which represents sales taxes earned in. May 2013. 9M. FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Review and approve, in concept, the FY 2013/14 - FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program, as presented. 9N. FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2013 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5310 CAPITAL GRANT APPLICATIONS 1) Adopt the FFY 2012/13 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5310 Riverside County project rankings as recommended by the local review committee (LRC); 2) Adopt Resolution No. 13-008, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Certifying Project Consistency with Regional Transportation Plan", certifying the projects are derived from a locally developed, coordinated public Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 10 transit -human services transportation plan (Coordinated Plan); and 3) Include the projects in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). 10. PROPOSED METROLINK BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager, presented the proposed Metrolink Budget for FY 2013/14, and highlighted the following areas: • FY 2013/14 operating budget; • Commission Metrolink budget impacts; • FY 2013/14 service expansion; • Fare increase; • Metrolink update; and • Next steps. At this time, Commissioner Glenn Miller left the meeting. At Chair Spiegel's request, Sheldon Peterson provided an overview of the TAP Enabled Ticket program. Chair Spiegel noted for riders who use Metrolink, there is a transfer built into the cost of the Metrolink ticket to take a bus or the subway when in Los Angeles. In response to Commissioner Henderson's question if the technology does not work and a rider misses a train, Sheldon Peterson replied there are Metrolink trains on a frequent basis. He explained this program is set up initially where Metrolink staff will be available to allow riders to transfer through and there is an emergency call box at all Metrolink stations where a rider can call to get help. Anne Mayer introduced and welcomed Michael DePallo, Chief Executive Officer for SCRRA. Michael DePallo expressed appreciation for the opportunity to discuss the proposed Metrolink Budget for FY 2013/14. He presented the comparisons to the FY 2012/13 budget, increased scope of work, and overall costs. He expressed gratitude to Michele Cisneros and Theresia Trevino for their assistance to Metrolink over the past four months as part of the Member Agency Advisory Committee (MAAC) and discussed the MAAC's key accomplishments. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 11 • At this time, Commissioner Jeffries stepped out of the meeting. Chair Spiegel expressed appreciation to Mr. DePallo for all of his efforts. M/S/C (Busch/Kotyuk) to: 1) Adopt the preliminary FY 2013/14 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget with anticipation of a 3 to 7 percent fare increase; 2) Approve the additional 91 Line service with two additional peak period round trips; 3) Allocate the Commission's funding commitment to the SCRRA in an amount not to exceed $8,401,000 in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for train operations and maintenance of way plus a contingency of $ 2,061,500 in LTF funds for new service options and fare policy possibilities; and 4) Allocate the Commission's Section 5309 grant funds in an amount not to exceed $1,729,300 for SCRRA capital rehabilitation projects. • At this time, Commissioner Jeffries rejoined the meeting. 11. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director, presented the state and federal legislative activities, and highlighted the following areas: • MAP-21's Buy America requirement for all federal -aid projects; • Impacts on projects; • Communications with U.S. DOT; and • State legislation - Bills of interest, CEQA bills, and revise bill positions. Anne Mayer stated Congress included a provision in MAP-21 that requires all utility companies to comply with Buy America, which is extremely restrictive. The utility companies state a federal mandate was passed without any consideration for their business practices. She stated this requirement impacts the agencies trying to deliver federal projects on a transportation system, which could shut down billions of dollars worth of projects in California and throughout the country. The federal government up until now was stating no waivers, no exceptions. She stated the SR-91 CIP has agreements that the utility companies are not agreeing to sign because there are no guarantees that all of the equipment can meet the Buy America clause. She provided an overview of the June 11 California Transportation Commission (CTC) meeting were Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 12 Southern California Edison attended to answer questions posed by the CTC members as well as meetings between the DOT undersecretary and utility companies throughout the country. Staff expects this matter to turn into a crisis throughout the state. She discussed staff's involvement in working with the state to come up with a solution and will keep the Commission informed. At this time, Commissioner John Benoit left the meeting. Commissioner Roger Berg discussed his experience with the Buy America program, which he believes can be difficult to work with but can be done. He expressed his belief that the problem is utility companies purchase supplies cheaper from China, India, or Indonesia. He expressed the United States and Riverside County need jobs and this is why Buy America needs to be enforced. He supports the Buy America program because while American supplies may cost more, Americans get the jobs. At this time, Commissioner Rush left the meeting. Commissioner Douglas Hanson concurred with Commissioner Berg's comments about advocating for Buy America. He stated these projects must go forward and asked about a compromise to prevent project delays yet fulfill the obligations and the desire to Buy America. Anne Mayer replied the original indication from DOT is there is no compromise and no alternatives, however, it has softened over the past six weeks. She stated DOT is requesting facts and a detailed transition plan so it may consider a transition plan for a very short duration to get the inventory systems established. In response to Commissioner Hanson's request for clarification if there is an exemption, Anne Mayer replied there is a possibility of a transition plan that would include a series of projects that may be allowed to move forward under the transition plan. In response to Commissioner Henderson's question if there are Commission projects that will be impacted due to the Buy America mandate, Anne Mayer replied the SR-91 CIP, however, it has not yet been delayed and staff is working on ways to minimize any impacts. Commissioner Jeffries referred to staff's recommendation item 3.b, and expressed he does not support AB 574 (Lowenthal), due to the following reasons: 1) he opposes cap and trade fundamentally on California business; and 2) it has only raised $36 million to date and the Governor and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 13 Legislature are going to borrow $500 million from that fund to backfill the state general fund. He requests an abstention on item 3.b of the State and Federal Legislative Update. M/S/C (Pettis/Hernandez) to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislative activities; 2) Adopt the following positions on state legislation: a) AB 37 (Perea) - Support; b) AB 401 (Daly) - Support; c) AB 493 (Daly) - Support; d) AB 543 (Campos) - Oppose; e) AB 756 (Melendez) - Support if Amended; f) SB 778 (Committee on Transportation & Housing) Support; 3) Revise the Commission's position on the following state legislation: a) AB 179 (Bocanegra) - Neutral; and b) AB 574 (Lowenthal) - Support if Amended. Abstain: Jeffries on 3.b No: Berg, Henderson, and Mann Commissioner Henderson clarified she is a member of the Commission's Quality of Life and Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee that recommended several of these actions as well as a member of the League of California Cities. She expressed concern about some conflicts between the two agencies positions and preferred not to vote yes on the entire report. She will update the Commission where those conflicts exist at its next meeting. 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar. 13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 13A. Commissioner Hanson announced the SunLine Transit Agency's Board placed General Manager Mikel Oglesby on administrative leave pending an investigation and the temporary General Manager is Roger Snoble. 13B. Anne Mayer provided an update on the Trade Corridor Investment Fund ITCIF) grade separation projects. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2013 Page 14 At Chair Spiegel's request, Steve DeBaun, legal counsel, announced the Closed • Session items. At this time, Commissioners Syed Raza, Ron Roberts, and Ted Weill left the meeting. 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Case Number(s): RIC 1002250, RIC 11 13896, and RIC 10016058 There were no announcements for the Closed Session items. 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Spiegel adjourned the meeting at 12:04 p.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 10, 2013, in the Board Room, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California. Respectfully submitted, , 051)(9-&-. C�I.�NO►r`— Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: William Von Klug, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement and/or Temporary Construction Easement Interests in All or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-270-010; 102-092-001; 102-102-020; 102-040-015; 118-250-027 and 118-250-028; 117-070-029; 117-111-001; 117-270-001; and 117-270-009, Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected properties and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner; 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 13-007, 13-013, 13-014, 13-015, 13-016, 13-017, 13-018, 13-019, and 13-020, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement and/or Temporary Construction Easement Interests in All or Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-270-010; 102-092-001; 102-102-020; 102-040-015; 118-250-027 and 118-250-028; 117-070-029; 117-111-001; 117-270-001; and 117-270-009; Located in Corona, Riverside County, California', for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), which extends the existing 91 Express Lanes east from the Orange/Riverside County line to Interstate 15, along with other operational improvements easterly to Pierce Street in Riverside. Agenda Item 6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is being asked to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity for the interests in the parcels listed below. These interests are required for construction of the SR-91 CIP. The power of eminent domain is used by the Commission only as a last resort to obtain interests necessary for public highway projects after 1) negotiations have stalled; or 2) the owner has requested the Commission proceed directly to eminent domain for tax or other advantages; or 3) the eminent domain process is necessary to clear the title to the property. In all cases, offers of just compensation have been made to the owners for the full Fair Market Value as determined by appraisals, Commission staff attempted to negotiate amicable settlements in good faith, and will continue to do so throughout the process. Fair Market Value is defined by the state of California and is one of the most inclusive definitions in the United States. It requires the highest and best use of the property be considered. All of the Commission's appraisals must meet the California definition of Fair Market Value. Staff will, over the next several months, bring to the Commission those interests that meet one of the three criteria above. The timing of these resolutions will balance the need to give the owners as much time as possible to reach an agreement, while at the same time allowing enough time for the Commission to go through the process to obtain possession in time to avoid costly delays to the design -build contractor. The legal process from adoption of the resolutions of necessity to receiving legal possession of the properties takes at least 150 days. California eminent domain law provides that a public entity may not commence with eminent domain proceedings until its governing body has adopted a resolution of necessity, which resolution may only be adopted after the governing body has given each party with an interest in the affected property, or their representatives, a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. Since an agreement has not been reached with some owners of record, it may be necessary to acquire necessary interests described by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is accomplished by the Commission's adoption of resolutions of necessity for the affected properties. Record owners must be afforded an opportunity to appear at the hearing and lodge any objections. Notices of this hearing were sent by first class mail to the property owners, and stated the Commission's intent to consider the adoption of resolutions, the right of the property owners to appear and be heard on these issues, and that failure to file a written Agenda Item 6 request to appear would result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission scheduled this hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date of notice was mailed may appear and be heard. An aerial view of the parcels subject to this staff report in relation to the SR-91 CIP is attached. Finding 1: Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proiect SR-91 in Riverside County ranks among the nation's worst commutes. Stop -and -go traffic is the norm, especially during morning and late afternoon rush hours. Traffic congestion on eastbound SR-91 between the cities of Anaheim and Corona is routinely among the worst 15 areas in the nation. SR-91 is continuing to experience increased congestion as a result of population growth in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties and the increase in jobs in Orange and Los Angeles Counties. Demographic projections for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region show population and employment in Riverside and Orange Counties are forecast to increase substantially by 2035. As a result, traffic volumes on SR-91 are expected to increase by approximately 50 percent by 2035, which would result in even greater congestion and delays on SR-91. The existing travel demand on SR-91 has led to a heavy directional commute pattern between Riverside and Orange/Los Angeles Counties that is projected to continue into the future. SR-91 is the only major highway that links Riverside and Orange Counties. Extending from the Riverside County/Orange County line in the city of Corona to Pierce Street in Riverside, the SR- 91 CIP will add regular lanes, tolled express lanes and connectors and improve interchanges, bridges, ramps, and local streets. New connections between the SR-91 and 1-15 also will be made. The SR-91 CIP is designed to reduce delays, improve air quality, offer a choice between regular lanes and express lanes, allow faster emergency response, relieve local street congestion, and provide better access to public transit and rails. Finding 2: The Proiect is Planned or Located in a Manner Most Compatible with Greatest Public Good and Least Private Injury A thorough analysis was conducted to find the single best location for the SR-91 CIP. Environmental analyses and findings indicate the chosen alignment uniquely satisfy engineering, public health, and environmental issues, and is the most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. To minimize private injury, a thorough analysis regarding the need for each property and each interest was conducted in the planning stages of the SR-91 CIP. Efforts during the planning stages included conducting public outreach meetings and seeking feedback about the SR-91 CIP Agenda Item 6 alignment and potential impacts. Staff also met regularly with various local agencies and businesses to determine if modifications to the alignment were necessary to minimize impacts. These efforts continued over the course of years to ensure the alignment design achieved the greatest public good with the least private injury. As part of the acquisition process, unless settlement was reached within the first 30 days after an offer was made, every owner was provided an opportunity to participate in project meetings with project staff. The goal of these meetings was to minimize private injury not only on the basis of information staff obtained through the planning process, but also on the information provided by the owners. As a result, staff has in many cases made design changes or included mitigation measures to reduce and minimize impacts to the property. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act has been satisfied by Ca!trans' certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) in its role as lead agency on August 8, 2012, and the Commission's subsequent consideration of that certified EIR in its role as a responsible agency on November 14, 2012. Finding 3: The Real Property to be Acquired is Necessary for the Project Each property interest sought below has been analyzed to determine if a feasible design alternative exists would alleviate the need for the interest. As indicated above, the property owners were invited to meet with project staff and provide input to address any concerns the property owners may have with the design of the SR-91 CIP in the manner proposed and the necessity of the acquisition. To the extent any property owner raised such concerns, staff took those concerns into consideration and attempted to make design modifications as feasible and possible. In the end, staff recommends the following interests in real property are necessary for the project. APN 102-270-010 (CPN 22167; RON No. 13-004 — Owner: Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc. APN 102-270-010 is owned by Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc., a California corporation. The property is located at 1805 West 6th Street, Corona, Riverside County, California. The property is irregular in shape and consists of approximately 41,818 square feet. It is currently occupied with a hotel, associated parking lot, and other improvements. The property is bounded by SR-91 to the north, 6th Street to the south, and neighboring commercial properties to the east and west. The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire the entire parcel in fee because the property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and the reconfiguration of the Maple Street interchange. The widening takes the existing eastbound SR-91 from one HOV lane and four general purpose lanes and widens it to two toll lanes and five general purpose lanes, and requires the freeway to be widened approximately 40 feet on the south side at this location. The eastbound Maple Street on -ramp will be relocated from its current position at the Maple Street over crossing to the 6th Street/Paseo Grande intersection, directly on top of the property. Agenda Item 6 The legal description and assessor's map of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-007. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was originally mailed on April 26 for the resolution of necessity hearing held on June 12. However, the parcel was not considered for adoption of a resolution of necessity at that meeting. Therefore, a subsequent Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APN 102-092-001 (CPN 22132; RON No. 13-013) — Owner: Elster APN 102-092-001 is owned by the Gary S. Elster and Pamela C. Elster, Trustees pursuant to that certain Declaration of Trust known as The Elster Family Trust, dated July 30, 1976. The property is located at 2260 Frontage Road, just south of SR-91, at the corner of Frontage Road and Ridgeview Terrace, in Corona, California. The irregularly shaped parcel consists of 15,682 square feet and is zoned general commercial. There is a single story building on site, which houses a Del Taco restaurant, and related improvements. The property is bounded by the Frontage Road to the north, Ridgeview Terrace to the east, an alley to the south, and a neighboring commercial property to the west. Agenda Item 6 The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire the entire parcel in fee because the property is impacted due to the widening of the SR-91 freeway and the reconfiguration of the Serfas Club Drive and Maple Street interchanges. The widening takes the existing eastbound SR-91 from one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane and four general purpose lanes and widens it to two toll lanes and five general purpose lanes, and requires the freeway to be widened approximately 28 feet on the south side at this location. In addition, due to the minimal spacing between the eastbound Serfas Club Drive on -ramp and the eastbound Maple Street off -ramp, a braided ramp configuration is required to meet Caltrans weaving distance standards. This braided ramp configuration requires the existing Frontage Road to be realigned approximately 80 feet to the south, thus impacting the entire property and necessitating acquisition of the entire parcel. The legal description and assessor map of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-013. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APN 102-102-020 (CPN 22138; RON No. 13-014) — Owner: Webb APN 102-102-020 is owned by Charlie R. Webb and Rosina G. Webb, as Managers of B.B.E. & W. Standard Common Direction Service Company, LLC, a California limited liability company. The property is located at 2000 Frontage Road, Corona, California. It is an improved, irregularly shaped lot currently occupied by a retail business selling ornamental lawn decorations, with a sales office, an associated parking lot, and other improvements. The site also contains a two- faced lighted billboard that is visible from the freeway. The property is bounded by the Frontage Road to the north, Via Josefa to the east and Via Santiago to the west and south. The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire fee and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property due to the widening of SR-91 and the reconfiguration of the Serfas Club Drive and Maple Street interchanges. The widening takes the existing eastbound SR-91 from one HOV lane and four general purpose lanes and widens it to two toll lanes and five general purpose lanes, and requires the freeway to be widened approximately 30 feet on the south side at this location. In addition, due to the minimal spacing between the eastbound Serfas Club Drive on -ramp and the eastbound Maple Street off - ramp, a braided ramp configuration is required to meet Caltrans weaving distance standards. This braided ramp configuration requires the existing Frontage Road to be realigned approximately 50 feet to the south on a skewed angle, thus impacting the northern frontage of the subject property. This parcel was originally identified as a full acquisition. As a result of discussions with the owners, staff was able to make modifications to the design and reduce the scope of the acquisition. Agenda Item 6 The legal definitions, legal descriptions and plat maps of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-014. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APN 102-040-015 (CPN 22141; RON No. 13-015) — Owner: United Rentals Northwest, Inc. APN 102-040-015 is owned by the United Rentals Northwest, Inc., an Oregon corporation. The property is located at 525 South Maple Street, in Corona, Riverside County, California. The property is irregular in shape and consists of approximately 60,026 square feet. It is improved with a commercial equipment rental facility, associated parking lot, and other improvements. The property is bounded by neighboring commercial businesses to the west, north and east; and SR-91 to the south. The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property because the south side of the subject property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and resulting realignment of the westbound Auto Center Drive off -ramp. The widening takes the existing eastbound SR-91 from one HOV lane and four general purpose lanes and widens it to two toll lanes and five general purpose lanes, and requires the freeway to be widened approximately 30 feet on the north side at this location. Additionally, due to the proposed reconfiguration of the Maple Street interchange, the existing Auto Center Drive off -ramp diverge -point had to be relocated approximately 2000 feet east to allow sufficient clearance for the proposed westbound Maple Street on -ramp to land and merge to the westbound SR-91 mainline. The realigned Auto Center Drive off -ramp is higher than the United Rentals site, and retaining walls will be constructed rather than a slope, to minimize the impact to the subject property. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-015. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APNs 118-250-027 and 118-250-0428 (CPN 22199; RON No. 13-016) — Owner: Maude -Corona, LLC. APNs 118-250-027 and 118-250-0-128 are owned by Maude -Corona, LLC. The property is located at 1080 Pomona Road, in Corona, Riverside County, California. The property is comprised of two contiguous parcels containing an area of about 5.52 acres, or 240,451 square feet. The property is currently improved with a Honda car dealership, associated parking lot, and other improvements. It is bounded by Pomona Road to the north, Oak Street Channel to the west, SR-91 to the south, and the Corona West Mobile Home Estates to the east. Agenda Item 6 The legal definitions, legal descriptions and plat maps of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-014. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APN 102-040-015 (CPN 22141; RON No. 13-015) — Owner: United Rentals Northwest, Inc. APN 102-040-015 is owned by the United Rentals Northwest, Inc., an Oregon corporation. The property is located at 525 South Maple Street, in Corona, Riverside County, California. The property is irregular in shape and consists of approximately 60,026 square feet. It is improved with a commercial equipment rental facility, associated parking lot, and other improvements. The property is bounded by neighboring commercial businesses to the west, north and east; and SR-91 to the south. The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property because the south side of the subject property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and resulting realignment of the westbound Auto Center Drive off -ramp. The widening takes the existing eastbound SR-91 from one HOV lane and four general purpose lanes and widens it to two toll lanes and five general purpose lanes, and requires the freeway to be widened approximately 30 feet on the north side at this location. Additionally, due to the proposed reconfiguration of the Maple Street interchange, the existing Auto Center Drive off -ramp diverge -point had to be relocated approximately 2000 feet east to allow sufficient clearance for the proposed westbound Maple Street on -ramp to land and merge to the westbound SR-91 mainline. The realigned Auto Center Drive off -ramp is higher than the United Rentals site, and retaining walls will be constructed rather than a slope, to minimize the impact to the subject property. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-015. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APNs 118-250-027 and 118-250-028 (CPN 22199; RON No. 13-016) — Owner: Maude -Corona, LLC APNs 118-250-027 and 118-250-028 are owned by Maude -Corona, LLC. The property is located at 1080 Pomona Road, in Corona, Riverside County, California. The property is comprised of two contiguous parcels containing an area of about 5.52 acres, or 240,451 square feet. The property is currently improved with a Honda car dealership, associated parking lot, and other improvements. It is bounded by Pomona Road to the north, Oak Street Channel to the west, SR-91 to the south, and the Corona West Mobile Home Estates to the east. Agenda Item 6 The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property because the property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and the reconfiguration of the Lincoln Avenue interchange. The widening takes the existing eastbound SR-91 from one HOV lane and four general purpose lanes and widens it to two toll lanes and six general purpose lanes, and requires the freeway to be widened approximately 52 feet on the north side at this location. Additionally, the westbound Lincoln Avenue on- and off -ramps are being realigned into a tight - diamond configuration. Specifically, the west Lincoln Avenue off -ramp diverge point is being shifted approximately 950 feet to the east, and the realigned off -ramp cuts through the southern frontage of the property. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-016. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APN 117-070-029 (CPN 22249; RON No. 13-017) — Owner: HAGF Enterprises, L.P. APN 117-070-029 is owned by the HAGF Enterprises, L.P., a California Limited Partnership. The property is rectangular in shape and approximately 28,314 square feet. It is currently improved with an auto repair facility, an Econo Lube facility, associated parking lot, and other improvements. The property is bounded by the westbound Main Street on -ramp to the south, Main Street to the east, a restaurant property to the north (Kabob Hut) and Washburn Circle to the west. The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates that the Commission acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property because the east side of the property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and resulting widening/profile change of Main Street under the freeway. It is necessary to widen Main Street approximately 35 feet to allow three through lanes north/south under the freeway from 3rd Street on the south side to Grand Avenue on the north side and increase turn pocket storage lengths for freeway on- and off -ramp movements. Due to the widening of the freeway overhead structure, the roadway surface of Main Street must be lowered approximately 1.2 feet to allow sufficient vertical clearances on either side of the bridge. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-017. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. Agenda Item 6 APN 117-111-001 (CPN 22261; RON No. 13-018) — Owner: Jameson -Mellor APN 117-111-001 is owned by Peter Wickett Jameson, as Successor Trustee Under the Jameson Trust dated May 15, 2000, as to an undivided three -eighths interest, and William J. Mellor, Trustee of the William J. Mellor 2005 Revocable Trust Under Declaration of Trust dated August 15, 2005, as an undivided five -eighths interest. The property is roughly rectangular in shape and consists of approximately 19,545 square feet. It is currently improved with a Del Taco restaurant building, associated parking lot, and other improvements. The property is bounded by Main Street to the west, 3rd Street to the south, the Ramona Ave to the east, and the Caltrans right of way to the north. The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire fee and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property because the west side of the subject property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and resulting widening/profile change of Main Street under the freeway. It is necessary to widen Main Street approximately 35 feet to allow three through lanes north/south under the freeway from 3rd Street on the south side to Grand Avenue on the north side and increase turn pocket storage lengths for freeway on- and off -ramp movements. The increased number of Main Street northbound lanes requires an acquisition across the west frontage of the property. The resulting Main Street configuration will require the construction of a short retaining wall and driveway adjustment. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-018. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. Agenda Item 6 APN 117-270-001 (CPN 22274; RON No. 13-019) — Owner: Desai APN 117-270-001 is owned by the Pranav U. Desai, a married man as his sole and separate property. The property is irregular in shape and consists of approximately 90,169 square feet. The property is currently improved with a commercial/industrial building, associated parking lot, and other improvements. It is bounded by Joy Street to the west, Pearl Street to the south and east, and a neighboring commercial property to the north. The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire fee and temporary construction easement interests in portions of the property because the south side of the property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and resulting realignment of Pearl Street north of the freeway. The freeway widening will provide additional capacity in both the additional general purpose lane as well as the proposed toll lanes. It is necessary to widen the freeway approximately 110 feet to the north in order to allow for the two new toll lanes and the addition of the 1-15 to westbound SR-91 connector -distributor lanes. Due to the widening of the freeway overhead structure at East Grand Boulevard, the intersection of Joy Street and East Grand Boulevard needs to be shifted northeast. The freeway widening and intersection shift requires a realignment of Pearl Street approximately 90 feet to the north. The realigned Pearl Street cuts through the southern frontage of the property. The legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps of the portions to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-019. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. APN 117-270-009 (CPN 22295; RON No. 13-020) — Owner: MacArthur APN 117-270-009 is owned by the M. Hebbard MacArthur, Trustee of The MacArthur Separate Property Trust, as to an undivided one-third interest; Shirley M. MacArthur, Trustee of The Shirley M. MacArthur Trust under Trust Agreement dated November 2, 1999, as to an undivided one-third interest; and Christopher H. MacArthur, as his sole and separate property, as to an undivided one-third interest. The property is currently improved with an automotive repair facility, an RV storage business, associated parking lot, and other improvements. The property is bounded by East Grand Boulevard to the west, the SR-91 freeway to the north, 3rd Street to the south, and a neighboring commercial property to the east. These businesses occupy two parcels for a total of approximately 106,286 square feet; however, only the northerly parcel, approximately 50,094 square feet, is required in its entirety. No property interests are required from the southerly parcel. Agenda Item 6 The design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates the Commission acquire the entire parcel in fee because the property is impacted due to the widening of SR-91 and resulting reconfiguration of the 91/15 interchange. The construction of these facilities will leave the remainder of APN 117-270-009 as an uneconomic remnant parcel, which the Commission is authorized to acquire by eminent domain, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410. The widening takes the existing eastbound SR-91 from one HOV lane and four general purpose lanes and widens it to two toll lanes and five general purpose lanes, and requires the freeway to be widened approximately 52 feet on the north side at this location. In addition, the eastbound 91/15 connector traffic is separated from SR-91 through traffic by the use of a three lane collector distributor. In addition, the eastbound Main Street on -ramp weave conflict is removed by allowing on -ramp traffic to merge with either the east 91/15 connector or the mainline SR-91 via a braided ramp configuration. Finally, an existing city of Corona sewer line will need to be relocated south of the improvements to tie back into an existing manhole at East Grand Boulevard. The legal description and map of the property to be acquired are exhibits to Resolution of Necessity No. 13-020. An aerial view of the parcel with an overlay of the property interests to be acquired and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Property Owners was mailed on May 24, 2013. Finding 4: Offers of Just Compensation Have Been Made to the Property Owners Preliminary title reports and/or litigation guarantees were obtained from Lawyers Title Insurance Company to confirm and identify the record owners of the parcels affected by the SR- 91 CIP. The Commission then served the affected property owners with notices of the Commission's decision to appraise the property. The Commission had the properties appraised by appraisal firms Hawran & Malm, LLC; Integra Realty Resources; Kiley Company; Lidgard and Associates; and Mason & Mason to establish the fair market value of the real property the Commission is seeking to acquire from the interests owned by the property owners identified herein. Review appraisals were prepared by Hennessey & Hennessey LLC. Fixture and equipment appraisals were prepared by Crockett & Associates, Ltd.; Desmond, Marcellos & Amster; and Hodges Lacey & Associates, LLC. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the property interests, based on the approved appraisals, as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the interests sought through eminent domain, to ensure the property will be available to meet the time frames associated with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. Agenda Item 6 Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact due to adoption of the resolutions of necessity. All property acquisition expenses are included in the SR-91 CIP budget. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 13-007 2) Resolution No. 13-013 3) Resolution No. 13-014 4) Resolution No. 13-015 5) Resolution No. 13-016 6) Resolution No. 13-017 7) Resolution No. 13-018 8) Resolution No. 13-019 9) Resolution No. 13-020 Agenda Item 6 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 13-007 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-270-010, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire a fee interest in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-270-010, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 CIP") in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with Califomia Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 13 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee interest in the property to be acquired is for the SR-91 CIP in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section'3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal description and the map of the property of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined and described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said • • 14 • • • existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 15 16 • File No: 12002670 EXHIBIT "A" FEE All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 3 of Trinidad Yorba Tract, in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 2 p 22 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to W.I. Hollingsworth by deed from the State of California, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995 of Official Records; thence along the Easterly boundary of said parcel North 9° 25' 50" East 237.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through an angle of 109° 46' 50" a distance of 47.90 feet to Course "A"; thence along Course "A" North 81° 08' 21" East 355.94 feet to the Easterly terminus of that certain curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 343.00 feet in the Southeasterly line of that portion of land condemned by the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records; said point also being on the Westerly boundary of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Ray N. Woods, et ux, by deed recorded May 12, 1961 as Instrument No. 40636, of Official Records; thence Southwesterly along said curve from a tangent bearing of South 78° 51' 44" West through an angle of 69° 25' 54" a distance of 415.65 feet; thence South 9° 25' 50" West parallel with said Easterly boundary 51.48 feet; thence North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That portion of the North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street which would ordinarily pass with a conveyance of Parcel 1 described above, as vacated by Resolution No. 82-115 of the City Council of the City of Corona, recorded January 28, 1983 as Instrument No. 18074, of Official Records, Riverside County records, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the land described in the Director's Deed to W.I. Hollingsworth, recorded December 6, 1965 as Instrument No. 136995, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the Southerly prolongation of the tangent portion of the Easterly line of Exhibit A, Page 1 17 File No: 12002670 said land of Hollingsworth, South 9° 25' 50" West 44.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 13.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" an arch distance of 20.42 feet to the Southerly line of said North 57.00 feet of West Sixth Street; thence along said Southerly line South 80° 34' 10" East to the Southerly prolongation of that certain course having a bearing and length of "South 9° 25' 50" West 51.46 feet" in the Southeasterly line of the land described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded August 12, 1960 as Instrument No. 71365, of Official Records, Riverside County records; thence along the last mentioned prolongation North 9° 25' 50" East 57.00 feet to said Northerly line of the North 57.00 feet of the West Sixth Street; thence along said West Sixth Street North 80° 34' 10" West 82.00 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 102-270-010 Exhibit A, Page 2 18 • ASSESSOR'S .114P eit /0E141,27 RIVERSIDE COLIPITY, CAz.lf • • FOR rjs. R.7W. (A977. RO L4 S1ERR4 YOR134) STATE 91 TR A ,cs 8 2.42Z 7-ph:kW Yc4to fkoct I ij.V.V0-101 PorreM93 15'394 4 co .7 -.59, 02-27 \ \•• Exhibit A, Page 3 19 20 • • • Corona Dynasty Suites, Inc. 102-270-010 W 6th Sttebt 2 1 • ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 13-013 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-092-001, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire a fee interest in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-092-001 (Caltrans Parcel No. 22132) for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owners were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee interest in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. 17336.02100\7995438.1 22 Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal description and map, respectively, of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section_4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6 More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property • • • 17336.02100\7995438.1 23 • that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7995438.1 24 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, state of Califomia, described as follows: • That portion of the Tomas Yorba Allotment shown as Parcel 1 on a map on file in Book 7,Page 77 of Parcel Maps, records of Riverside County, California, lying within the following described property: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 46 in Tract No. 2319, as shown by map on file in Book 43. Pages 74 to 76, of maps, records of Riverside County: Thence along the Northerly prolongation of the Westerly line of said Lot 46, being along the Easterly line of Ridgeview Terrace 60 feet wide, North 15' 29' 00" East, 28.32 feet to the to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 15' 29' 00" East, 97.13 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Westerly and having a radius of 230 feet: Thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 1 i' 31' 15", an arc distance of 46.25 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 13 feet; Thence Northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 83' 04' 46", an arc distance of 18.85 feet to a point of tangency on the South line of Frontage Road, 30 feet wide; Thence along said South line North 87' 02' 31" East, 102.96 feet to the beginning of a curve therein; Thence parallel with the aforesaid Easterly line of Ridgeview Terrace, South 15' 29' 00" West, 175.18 feet to a line parallel with and 28 feet Northerly at right angles from the North line of aforesaid Lot 46; Thence along said parallel line, North 83' 07' 17" West, 102.82 feet to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the following land conveyed to the County of Riverside and described as follows: All of that portion of land conveyed to Milton Enterprises, inc., by receiver's deed recorded November 2, 1972 as instrument no. 146342, of official records of Riverside County, California and lying within the following described strip of land: that portion of the Tomas Yorba Allotment as shown by map on file in Book 2. Page 7, of maps, records of San Bernardino County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 46 in Tract No. 2319, as shown by map on file in Book 43. Page 74 of maps, records of Riverside County. California, said Northwest comer being a point in the East line of Ridgeview Terrace (60 feet wide); Thence North 1 5' 29' 00" East. 125.45 feet on said East line of Ridgeview Terrace to the beginning of a curve therein, concave Westerly 230 feet radius; Thence Northerly 46.46 feet on said curve, through a central angle of II* 34' 22" to the to the true point of beginning, being at a point of reverse curvature through which a radial line bears South 86' 05' 22" East; Thence Northeasterly along a curve, concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 13 feet, through a central angle of 83` 07' 53", an arc distance of 18.86 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Frontage Road, 50 feet wide; Thence tangent to said curve and along said Southerly line North 87* 02' 31" East. 102.97 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1,344 feet: thence Easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 11' 36' 29"an arc distance of 272.29 feet; EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 26 Thence tangent to said curve and continuing along the South line of Frontage Road, South 81' 21' 00" East, 944.44 feet to the West line of an existing alley, 20 feet wide: Thence along said West line, South 8° 39' 00" West, 2 feet; Thence parallel with Frontage Road, North 81' 21' 00" West, 944.44feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1,342 feet; Thence Westerly along said curve, through a central angle of II* 36' 29", an arc distance of 271.89 feet; Thence tangent to said curve, South 87° 02' 31" West, 105.22 feet Thence South 45' 28' 34" West, 14.24 feet to the True Point of Beginning. APN: 102-092-001-1 • EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 27 £ 39Vd `V 1191HX3 MIS YAP /S MR .SSCSSYEXr PURPOSES ONLY 4� ASSESSOR'S AIAP BK. J02 PC 09 RIVERSIDE COL/N7r, CALIA" f 0.90A As iee; r r. tser 0l9A•Ac POR. SEC.28, r 3 S., R. 7W (POR. R 0. LA SIERRA YORBA J SSFAr'£ HWY 7. R A. .5933 J9 40 o pAR. I 1 I.00 A6.J0. A © \ MB, 43/74-76 Tract No. 23/9 AtB.47/10-14 Trott No. 2585 PM. 7/77 Parcel Map 4691 P. M. ll4/92-93 186/8 "ex r/ r✓Ilr/si ALLEY t n \ JZ 37 �. I. Cr) `\ 33 , n bl+'7OP* • TERRACE NOV. 1974 jss 9.32.3 /02-09 r • I" • /00' co O • • • • ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 13-014 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-102-020, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire fee and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-102-020 (Caltrans Parcel No. 22138) for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owners were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing.. 17336.02100\7995458.1 31 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee and temporary construction easement interests in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps, respectively, of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the -public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and • • 17336.02100\7995458.1 32 • • • determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 1733 6.02100\79954 58.1 33 • Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 173 3 6.02 100179 80141.1 EXH1e A, PAGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 zz 23 24 25 26 27 2g 29 30 31 PSO AS EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22138-1 Fee Acquisition APN 102-102-020 In the County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded August 27, 2008 as Document No. 2008-472052 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said land; thence South 42°50'35" West 59.34 feet along the general easterly line of said land; thence North 23°59'41" West 23.67 feet; thence North 88°28'17" West 211.96 feet; thence South 42°07'33" West 18.40 feet to a point on the general westerly line of said land, said point being the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 70.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 85°45'54 West; thence along the general westerly and northerly lines of said land the following four (4) course: ]) northerly along said curve 16.70 feet through a central angle of 13°40' 19"; 2) North 09'26'13" East 44.94 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 13.00 feet; 3) northerly, northeasterly and easterly along said curve 20.42 feet through a central angle of 90°00'39"; and 4) South 80°33'08" East 254.58 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 11,411 square feet. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:2PfG0105014SURVEMEGALS\22138_APN_102-]02-02011xeaisl22138-1-F E.docx Paw 1 of 10/52012 y — EXHISIg A, PAGE 2 • • PS O 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 6 L am: - C�""er.X 7 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10.45=iz Date 1'\2YfGOl050ik.sURVENALFGALS122138 AP11_102-102-020Tegals\22138-1-FEE.docx 10/5/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIINT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLEI GRANTOR ARE A APN 22138-1 FEE 2000 FRONTAGE ROAD TRUST 11,411 SO.FT, 102-102-020 211 212 213 214 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY/ • C/C STATIONING. CURVE DATA TABLE DELTA RADIUS DISTANCE NO. LINE DATA TABLE Cl 90°00'00" 1 3.00' 20.2 2" NO. BEARING DISTANCE C2 56°35'39" 70.00' 69.14' L1 N23°59'41"W 23.67' C3 90°00'30" 13.00' 20.42' L2 S42°07'33."W 18.40' C4 13°40'19" 70.00' 16.70' L3 S85°45`54"W(R) 70.00' ROUTE 9 i RIVERSIDE IDE 'PROPOSED"- - - FROM % .` -�X S :Nc RrYySTATE R/bVs r ''�-- AGE RD _irn ��� O "' _FREEWAY a. S8p°3 __1 811 C3�,a'�XfSr1fG JE 25q, 58' _ POB~ i R t q' i (, 1 yr r v f '� (D al 4 s"bixi+%" `�. „ ' +^ ";4.:.: ,. t:r L 'i & �. a' c, . N • fr > �iF, x .a { 1" � I O Cis r � �' S� � 2 21 3 8 1 �yyF� 4A� & Cr) �'Tl x R r L �r»'Y sL f4l' 4S..{y.. j}�r �.. O z f Y hai t\. Y lk. y T+ Y Y 7 A•; �rJt . •,' 4+"M }'4 4 V.+�� L•j � �Y �.t� k 7 ✓! �I � J� .e3i �. �. C4 t`v�`� 'N88°'28`1 7,)W o� 4 4 s �f '96 $..� ;N FG Y Sry I i1C2 1 \ q4� \ \ P.��:.. CFr L e PROPOSED R/W L1 `" e N /. D., DOD ,# 2003`47/2952 0..R., i�`> � / / ") r e q� 'I'9 �,� (,V , . / Q °s � �, e 4 LEGEND �s-, �6-9 \ POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing .7 �' /.1 �N. `p Cl - /' / �_ e" / ( )Title to State )02-250-045 ej 1 1 1 I l Access Prohibited i NOTES , Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) 2one 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances, Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 22 2 2 3 - FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: DATE:10-05-2012 REv.: EA: OF540 FAA: PSOMAS 1 r, c, a 'cf(; CrnT 17 2C4 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO, TOTAL SHEETS . ri'eT Santo Ana, Ce[iferrio 927J7 P 141751-e3r3,(71.05.15-843 VQ.) 8 R I V 91 4.0 1 . 1 EXHigg A, PAGE 4 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS AS EXHIBIT `Bl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22138-2 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-102-020 In the County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded August 27, 2008 as Document No. 2008-472052 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said land; thence South 42°50'35" West 59.34 feet along the general easterly line of said land; thence North 23°59'41" West 23.67 feet; thence North 88°28'17" West 128.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 01°31'43" West 5.00 feet; thence North 88°28'17" West 32.00 feet; thence North 01°31'43" East 5.00 feet; thence South 88°28'17" East 32.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 160 square feet. See Exhibit `112' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination tactor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG01050i\SURVEY1.F.GAI.S\22138_APN_102-102-020%cgals122138-2-TCE.docx Pave I oft I0/5/2012 EXHIlirr A,PAGE 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS AS Prepared under the direction of /e-es--IZ Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG010501�SURVEYTEGALS122138_APN_102-102-0201.egals122138-2-TCE.docx Page 2 of 2 10fii2012 EXHIR A, PAGE 6 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22138-2 TCE 2000 FRONTAGE ROAD TRUST 160 SOFT. 102-102-020 21 3 214 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY/ C/L STATIONING LINE DATA TABLE CURVE DATA TABLE NO. BEARING DISTANCE 23.67' L1 N23°59'41"W NO. DELTA RADIUS DISTANCE L2 S01°31'43"W 5.00' Cl 90°00'00" 1 3.00' 20. 42' L3 N01 ° 31 '4 3"C 5.00' C2 56° 35'38" 70.00' 69.1 4' L4 N88° 28' 1 7"W 32.00' C3 90° 00' 39" 1 3.00' 20.4 2' ROUTE 9 r RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 'PROPOSED'-----j FRON%gGE EXISTING Riw STATE R/w - RD i' - ° - --- c. 1r : EXIS S80033 ,, ,, 2 C3 TING 54. 58' POB ~'-, �'"' 1 h. N rn TPOB o i o a 1 o N88°28'17'W 211.96' , I z j32.00 4-)a 4 L3 L4 .L2 128.36' co l L 1 �. SC2 22138-2 PROPOSED R/W N. P, • S DOC, � # 200:3--472052 J � R , (I:› q,� �) / 0 `� ,- /� ti °�, /" 170 550 '1. �" LEGEND s� ,0 POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Bearing �p C1 �Q �. 'Oj_ , � /' ( )Title to State 102-250-045 / j, I I I Access Prohibited �' NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet 1 unless otherwise noted. 2 2 1 3 8— 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET OM 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: DATE:10-0 -2012 REv.: EA: 0F540 FA#: PSOMAS 3 Hut tOn Centre Drive, Ste. 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS Sur:To Ann Ccttfarnio ?2707 17t41751-7373i(714)54S-8823 (Pali 8 RI V 91 4.0 i- 1 EXHolig A, RAGE 7 • • _- - v FEE 11,411 SF (Total Parcel Area 32,234t SF) Term rary Construction Easement 160 SF • • • • ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. 13-015 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-040-015, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-040-015 (Caltrans Parcel No. 22141), for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 17336.02100\7995486.1 46 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement ,and temporary construction easement interests in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps, respectively, of the interest(s) to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and • • 17336.02100\7995486.1 47 • • determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7995486.1 48 • • Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary Construction Easement" or "TCE" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors, and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities related SR91 Corridor Improvement Project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the non- exclusive easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights described herein. The property affected is described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. Such right shall be exercised for a period of one year, beginning no fewer than 30 days after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. 17336.02100\7980019.1 EXHIBEIN PAGE 1 • • • PSO AS t EXII[BIT `Al' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22141-1 5 _ Fee Acquisition 6 APN 102-040-015 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of 9 Parcel 2 as shown on the Parcel Map filed in Book 4, Page 91 of Parcel Maps, in the 10 Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: 12 Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 09°26'44" East 13 35,27 feet along the westerly line of said Parcel 2; thence leaving said westerly line 14 South 88°34'02" East 52.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 15 radius of 3879.00 feet; thence easterly 164.16 feet along said curve through a central 16 angle of 02°25'29" to the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; thence 17 3} South 42°53'55" West 8.22 feet along said southeasterly line to the southeasterly corner 18 of said Parcel 2; thence South 82°57'44" West 218.84 feet along the southerly line of 19 said Parcel 2 to the Point of Beginning. 20 21 Containing 4173 square feet. 22 23 See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 24 25 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 26 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 27 " Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 28 29 30 31 3/12/2012 r-QPTG0105olLSUKVIiMEGALS122141_APN_102-040-0151Lega1s122141-1_ El:.doc Page 1 or2 EXIMISRA, PAGE 2 t The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 2 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 3 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 4 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 5 6 7 'F Prepared under the direction of: 8 9 10 11 12 !3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3- it. -101 Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 Date 3/12/2012 t,4:12P7G010501\SURt I'1LEGA t.S122111_AYN_102-0t0-0I5tLegals122141-1, Pagc 2 of 2 EXHIES3A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-1 FEE UNITED RENTALS NW 4173 SOFT. 102-040-015 PJNJ, 1 42/ 6 )3 R J S J 65/3 1 %' l ' al 0 16 + °i ___ r i w �DOC N°p p -"-- t PARCEL _% P.M. ---------- # 2003— 00526E34 / i �`� \h of • i� J S 62/4 4 54' 1-- LLI W CC VJ �.1 Q 1 1 \ \ \ 102-090-026 4/91/ 0 I / , R J 4) hh %0<r) 102-040-029 —_�__ - coP Z^ 102-040-015 (� 1 I J 1�� J 'J/L� 1 PARCEL 2 —PROPOSED Riw ,,4';ti 102-270-001 �--y ,' 220 FREEWAY .la ■ RPIV EX15jiNG FREEWAY 9 pE OMWM is rrw�i 215 _ 218,84'„ S82° 57144 W 91 RIVERSIDE �� �T STATIONING a 91 RIVERSIDE (22141 =1) SEE SHEET 2 6 7 ROUTE LEGEND POB Indicotes TPOB Indicates IR) indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1, Access Prohibited NOTES FEET 2 2 1: 4 1 - 1 FEE ACQUISITION Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet 1 unless otherwise noted. 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: P S O A S 3 Hu:ton Centre Drive, Ste. 200Sent g7141C7 751373/(710545--8883 WOO - DATE: 12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA:OF540 FAn: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS - 8 R I V 91 4.2 1 2 EXHIC151414t PAU% 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-1 N M FEE ' ' 0 t M~'r 031 to N �. Nr r Nr tv CV N 0 rn a, o z ; 0 47 P � � Vj (n UNITED RENTALS NW 4173 SO.FT. 1Jr1f Orl J 102-040-015 nue # 008- 005 684 0 , R , S00° 59, 0=02° 25'29" R=3879.001 L=164.16' S82° 57144"W PQB 221 41 218.8 102-040--015 N4) �A 4 °h 102-270-001 S42°53'55"W 8.22 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWA. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 Indicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C ) Title to State )III) Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 221414 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: S O >A 3 +Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Santo Ana Californio 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)545-81583 (Fon) DATE:12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA.OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE - SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL. SHEETS RIV 91 4.2 • • PS A t EXHIBIT TV 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 Ef 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22141-2 5 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 6 APN 102-040-015 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of 9 Parcel 2 as shown on the Parcel Map filed in Book 4, Page 91 of Parcel Maps, in the i to Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 09°26'44" East 13 35.27 feet along the westerly line of said Parcel 2 to the True Point of Beginning; thence 14 South 88°34'02" East 52.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a 15 radius of 3879.00 feet; thence easterly 164.16 feet along said curve through a central 16 angle of 02°25'29" to the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; thence l7 North 42°53'55" East 11.11 feet along said southeasterly_ line to the beginning of a non- ts tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 3871.00 feet, a radial line to said 19 j beginning bears South 01°06'21" East; thence westerly 171.51 feet along said curve 20 j through a central angle of 02°32' 19"; thence North 88°34'02" West 51.76 feet to the 2t ` westerly line of said Parcel 2; thence South 09'26'44" West 8.08 feet along said westerly 22 line to the True Paint of Beginning. 23 24 Containing 1761 square feet. 25 26 See Exhibit 132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 3 t combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 3 12,2012 W1:12PTG0105011SURVFY1LEGALS1221 11mAPN 102-Qi0-0151Legats122141-2 WAL _ESM'rdoc Page f 012 EXHIRT6A, PAGE 6 Prepared under the direction of 4 5 1, .c.� --r,ny �. ote,...6 3- t C.• -- 20 t- 6 'j Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 Date 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3/12/2012 MA2PTG010501tSUXV1iYALU;ALS122141 APN,_102-040-0151Leeuts\22141-2 WA1.1,_ESvi1',d0c Page 2or2 EXHIESVA, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 221 41 -2 ESMT UNITED RENTALS NW 1 761 SO.FT. 102-040-01 5 P„NIJ 1 /2/96- 92 R S 65/81 . o cb � ' DOG if) r\; s� .� 582°57,44 221:41-2 1 PARCEL P,1NA, N80° Ss 1 f W #200a- 00526E34 , h N 0o) • R , S ., 54' I--_ W CtI �j 14.1 J Nt • 1 I 102-040-026 1 4%91 33 9.3 2 U , R ., ti el?, Milli" EXISTING 91 RIVERSIQE STATIONING a RIVE RSIDE ,, A.)4 'k' 102-040-024 "v rr, �� Nco cn�N _-- _ -- �� 4��Ba'„ 215 102-040-015 PARCEL PROPOSED 2 R/W '��� w ROUTE C/G 97 102-270-001 Riw� FREEWAY no 9 FREEVVAY SEE SHEET 2 6 ' R()HTE LEGEND POB Indicates TPOB Indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True. Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State i i I l I Access Prohibited NOTES FEET 2 2 1 4 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING 1- 2 EASEMENT Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distonces are in feet unless otherwise noted. 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: P S O A S 3 Hutton. Centre Drive, Ste. 200 SentArlo, olifernao 92)07 (7 4)751.73734714)545-8883 (Fox) DATE: 12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA:OF540 FA#: DISTRICT - COUNTY -- ROUTE - SHEET PM - SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 - R I V 91 4.2 1. 2 tAtilU51814, PAbe S EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22141-2 ESMT UNITED RENTALS NW 1761 SOFT. 102-040-015 ':). III P.M, /91 • O rn O O PARCEL 2 o �� • M co �' o 102-040-015 / / , 3 to N N DOC #200c3- 0052624 0 . R . h� to f �A 0� A. � oN n, cn o tr O (n p M c p 2214 1-s2: ti �� 43 S01°06'21"E (R) ^) co � ° h 1b2-270-001 - iii& N$8° 34; 02"W ..,.5.L Z_6_ � A=02° 32'1 9" 1 �ati R� 1.1 .00 - -1.=1 /1, 5.1 ' - %_- 52.88 588° 34'02"E 1141 S82Q TPOB POC R=387 a29.00 L-164.16" A=0225 `_ 1 1 .1 1' 57 ' 4 4" W 218.84 5OO°59,.311�E- URi! ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY---�'" C/L STATIONING 9 a 6 7 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State 11 I 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 . 4 1 - 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ,W,wwwwwww / ' FEET 0 25 50 100 150IIIII PREPARED BY: DATE:12-13-11 REV.:2; 3-12-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: P S O S 3 Hutton Centre Drixe• Ste. 2D0 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE- SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 57714170-7373/(7 4 (150-8883 (fox) 8 RIV 91 4.2.. 2 2 ca�rsx�rT`.3`• • • • 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 a 14 k 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 EXHIBIT `Cl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caitrans Parcel No. 22141-3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-040-015 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of Parcel 2 as shown on the Parcel Map filed in Book 4, Page 91 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 09°26'44" East 43.35 feet along the westerly line of said Parcel 2 to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 09°26'44" East 3.03 feet along said westerly line; thence leaving said westerly line South 88°34'02" East 51.33 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 3868.00 feet; thence easterly 174.29 feet along said curve through a central angle of 02°34'54" to the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; thence South 42°53'55" West 4.17 feet along said southeasterly line to the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 3871.00 feet, a radial line to said beginning bears South 01 °06'21" East; thence westerly 171.51 feet along said curve through a central angle of 02°32' 19"; thence North 88°34'02" West 51.76 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 673 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 3 i € combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 3/12 2012 MUPTG0105011SURVL:YNLEOALS1221 t1_APN_102-040-01SI cbal022141-3;1tE.doc Page 1 of EXHIBIRA, PAGE 10 t 2 Prepared under the direction of 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 3 - /t: • ZrD1 Z Date 3112/2012 W112PTC0105011.St)RVEY\LEGALS1221a1_APN 102-040.01ill, ega1s12214It3..TCC.doc Page 2of2 EXHISs ft, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-3 TCE UNITED RENTALS NW 673 SOFT. 102-040-015 P.M. 142/ 6— 2 R , S , 85/81 °; �'`R o DOC N S82057'440 PARCEL S8Q°55,10��E # 2009- 005 / N� . R J S J. t � J / �f Lf i 54' , Lu >Ct � 1 QJ `1 Q a \ illai 4 102-040-026 1 339.32, 6 3-r^ 0.R. cb P' rt� 0 x �0) �" 4) (A 0 �,^-) 102-040-024 w a (r)^. N'MlV/ 0) an ZN ��PROPOSEO � i —y 102-040-01 5 P.M.P , M , 4 / 91 PARCEL 7 R/W 102-270-001 -" —' — -- R/W FREEWAY 220 FREEWAY - 218.84 EXISTING W !ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE C/L STATIONING a 91 RIVERSIpE T-- 215 229 41�-3 SEE SHEET 2 6 ROUT R0 LEGEND POB Indicates TPOB Indicates (R) Indicates Point Of Beginning True Point Of Beginning Radial Bearing C ? Title to State 1 MI 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES FEET „t 2 1 4 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 1 - 3 EASEMENT 300 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ail distances are in feet 1 unless otherwise noted. 0 50 100 200 PREPARED BY: S O A S 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200Santo Ana, California ;714075t 7105Q5--S98 733/$73 (Fox) DATE:12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT - COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V - 91 4 .2 - 1 2 EXHIBIT C2 { ) PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-3 TCE UNITED RENTALS NW 673 SO.F T. 102-040-015 O r•- S88°34'02"E _51 .33 .76 N8834'02"W 6 S82 POC ' ')/ a 1 PARCEL 102-040-015 DOO #2000- 0052,SO4 D , R1 ,2 2,1 "4_1 - 3) S01 °08'56"E (R) A=02° 34'54" -7...3.8_61UQL, I_ =1 7 4.2 9' R=3871.00 L=1 7' 44"W A=02' 32'19" 218.84 1 i '21"E oq rr 102--270-001 4.17' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWA. ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE IESIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State J L I l I_Access Prohibited 7 8 9 NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet uniess otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: O A 3 Mutton Centre Drive Ste: 200 Santo- Anoi Colifornio 92707 (7141751-3373/1710545-8883.(Fox) DATE:12-1 DISTRICT 8 22141-3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 100 3-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA: OF540 FAIL: COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 4.2 SHEET NO. 2 TOTA L SHEET5 2 bttflat331,17nR3e i United Rentals 102-040-015 fr, .1111111 FEE 4,173 SF (Total Parcel Area 60,026# SF) Mr Permanent Wall Footing Easement 1,761 SF NM Temporary Construction Easement 673 SF - *-•. *q 44 • j. • *Vt.:16° r r i r • • • i iP i • J ! ' ATTACHMENT 5 RESOLUTION NO. 13-016 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 118-250-027 AND 118-250-028, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-250-027 and 118-250-028 (Ca!trans Parcel No. 22199), for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the fast equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owners were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 17336.02100\7995487.1 65 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps, respectively, of the interest(s) to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and • • 17336.02100\7995487.1 66 • • determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 1733 6.02100\7995 4 87.1 67 • Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of one year, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 73 6,02[;X3t79!i3-1-1 € EXHiS1S A, PAGE 1 • PSOMAS t 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22199-1 Fee Acquisition APN's 118-250-027 & 028 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the lands described in the Deeds recorded May 9, 2001 as Document No. 2001-201209 and September 30, 2003 as Document No. 2003-765688, both of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2001- 201209; thence North 81°54'27" West 231.37 feet along the general southerly line of said land to a point; thence North 79°02'29" West 224.20 feet continuing along said line to the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 11 °20'58" East 54.21 feet along the westerly line of said land to the southwesterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688; thence North 11 °20'58" East 31.41 feet along the westerly line of last said land to a point, said point being South 11 °20'58" West 9.23 feet from the northwesterly comer thereof, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 589.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 09°47'27" Fast; thence easterly along said curve 112.72 feet through a central angle of 10°57'54" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 633.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 114.86 feet through a central angle of 10°23'48" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave southerly having a radius of 5523.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 225.43 feet through a central angle of 02°20' 19" to a point on the easterly line of the land described in said Document No. 2001-201209; thence South 08°03'54" West 54.21 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 31,462 square feet. PA2PTG0105011SUR VEYILEGA1.S122199 118-250-028_ 118-260-0161Lega1s122199-1_Fee.doc 8/17/2012 Page 1 of EXHIEFIT A, PAGE 2 3 PSOMAS See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 6 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 7 8 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 9 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing to ! grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 1 t combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 12 13 14 Prepared under the direction of: 15 16 17 cc:_ LGP 18 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTGOlOS0PSURVE111,F.GALS122199— _ _ 118-250-028 113-261W161Legals1222119-I i�ee.doe 8/17/2012 Page 2 of EXHI1712 A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22199-1 FEE MAUDE-CORONA LLC 31462 SO.FT, 118-250-027 & 028 N41 °29'C('2"E —-- 581a58'26"E7 372.59' ---1 /� 30.;20' Sly Right -of -Way' S72° 14'50"E1.��f } N12°49'5,9"E � Line of Pomona Street 24.07' CS�� 42.�04 .._ N77�16`42"W(R} > --_..wY,.__.. S07 46 08 W(R)/ ;,,., C4 CURIE DATA oo Tr N78-45'14" (Rr RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Np CI 589.00' 10° 5 7'54" 1 12.72' t C2 633.00' 10°23'48's 114.86' q Q M o C3 5523.00" 02°20'19" 225_43' in,�, Jl O C4 1 775.00' 01 °28'33" 45.72' ( a `�' N C5 65.00' 09°59'02" 11.33' o <U W f o DOC. NO. Ni2001 -201 209 O.R. o — ?OR, O PARCEL 3 in z o N le N co R.S. 46/3! er M E t i 1 i 1 I ® N09^47'27"E(R1 .-- 22`199,i 1 N12"41'53"E(R1 C `?i _ 1 j Y ___ 1 % q r ,. I N15PR0PQ p R iw ,,; . 21 ----=---� �o N79 02'29"W —'7`-- N81°54'27"W -� 224.20' 231 .37' _ EXISTING R%W" POB SEE SHEET 2 DETAIL "A" ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 9 290 1 2 3 4 295 6 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY TPOB indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C/L STATIONING ( )Title to State _LLI,1_ Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on Cc5 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground (� 2 2 1 9 9- 1 FEE ACQUISITION distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 fame. plimmimmommus FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS . DATE: 10-24-11 REV.:08-17-12 EA:OF540 FAst: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I v 91 5.6 1 c EX111913 A PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-1 FEE MAUDE-CORONA LLC I 2001-201209 O.R. 1.1 M cO PARCEL 3 R.s.>�/3I Frls-Leo-ova 9.23 —� N58° 30'06" W ,t�\ _. = ; 34.65' _ _ . _._.... _ 31 462 SO.F T. 118-250-027 & 028 .LLL.E_Ll_.Ll_L I. i LLi ! ! 1 t \ e N09-47'27„E(R),� u,'- 4' DOC . NO. DETAIL "A" Scale: 1 "=20' LEGEND P08 Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ) Title to State t l l Access Prohibited 224.20" --- • NOTES Coordinates and beorings ore on CCS 1983(2007 00) Zone 6. Distonces and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances: All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22199--1 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 10 20 ?■1rr�turir�� 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 Flo*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. • TOTAL SHEETS RI 9i 5.6 2 2 EXHIM4A, PAGE 5 • 3 5 6 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 I PSOMAS EXHIBIT `131' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22199-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN's 118-250-027 & 028 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the lands described in the Deeds recorded May 9, 2001 as Document No. 2001-201209 and September 30, 2003 as Document No. 2003-765688, both of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2001- 201209; thence North 08°03'54" East 54.21 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 5523.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 12°41'53" East; thence westerly along said curve 225.43 feet through a central angle of 02°20'19" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 633.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 114.86 feet through a central angle of 10°23'48" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave southerly having a radius of 589.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 112.72 feet through a central angle of 10°57'54" to a point on the westerly line of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688, said point being North 11°20'58" East 85.62 feet from the southwesterly corner of said land described in said Document No. 2001-201209; thence North 11 °20'58" East 9.00 feet along said westerly line to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 597.86 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 09°48'53" East; thence easterly along said curve 106.82 feet through a central angle of 10° 14'13"; thence South 72°32'48" East 117.65 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 5529.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 10° 19'37" East; thence easterly along said curve 228.31 feet through a central angle of P:12PTG010500SURVEYu.EGALS122199_118-250-028_118-260-0164..egals\22199-2_PE.doc 8/17/2012 Page 1 of 2 Engin A, PAGE 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 l4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS 02°21'57" to a point on said easterly line; thence South 08°03'54" West 6.02 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. • Containing 3,425 square feet. See Exhibit '62' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of: Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PatPTG0105011SURV EYlLEGALS122199 118-250-028 118-260-016\Lcpals\22199-2_PE.doc 8/17r012 Pagc 2 of EXHIFjS A, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-2 ESMT MAUDE-CORONA LLC 3425 SOFT. 118-250-027 & 028 N41 °29"0'2"E -.; /"----- .581 °58'26"E 372.59' :- 30120'A SI), Right--of---Wol 572°14'50"E-' N12°49'g9' E-- Line o .Pomone Street 24.07' /` 42.04` ,N77°16`42"VC7 I(R) 7°4'd8"W(R)1 506 \\ ) i ;, C6 I c CURVE DATA o N_7$°45'1 y'"iW(R) i' t # RADIUS DELTA LENGTH "' 1 C1 5523.00' 02°20'19" 225.43' C2 633.00' 10°23'48" 114.86' v o °? C3 589.00' 10°57'54" 112.72' `n i ;/� ri 1 O ' M C4 597.86' 10°1,1'13" 106.82' ( � I In N C5 5529.00' 02° 21 '57" 228.31 ' o co 41 : C6 1 775.00' 01 °28'33'. 45.72' tri o C7 65.00' 09°59'02" 11.33' u:i o l O DOC. NO. 2001 —201 209 O.R. t ° FOR. OF PARCEL 3 1 1 1► 1 1 1 1 z R.S, 461.31 N10°19`37"E(R) i O �' °o N20° 03 06"E(R) / O. /: 2�2199= 2� Q rn i `) ___ C4 S7 0 N12°41'34"E(R) Gw r 1 1 i ri 1-` , 32"98"E / j _ _ r -I PROPOSED .. 1 I1 .- y C 3 �- '� 11 j C2 �-• C1 __-..._ `► / N12°41'53"E(Rl �6.0 2 !- — —._ —_.. 1 t TPOB _ --- . _� _ .____ \ \/ 54.21 ' __ 1 id79°02 29"W �'��` N81°54'27"Vd EXISTING R/VI 224.20' 231.37' 1 PO$ SEE SHEET 2� 1 DETAIL 'A", ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 1 ! 1 I 9 290 1 2 3 4 295 6 LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY POB tndicotes Point Of Beginning TPOB tndicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Beoring C/[ STATIONING ( ) Title to Stote 1 1 a 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) tore 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide oy 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 9 9 -- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. i 'moms' pummlimmemmil FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FAst: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS d [l R1V 91 5.6 i 2 EXHIIfs7 A, PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-2 I_SMT. MAUDE-CORONA LLC N09° 4 8'53"E (R ) 3425 SO.FT. DOC. NO. 2001 - 201 209 O.R. PARCEL 3 R.S. 48/3 ) l N58° 30'06"W C4 34.65' 118-250-027 & 028 118-250-028 9.00 ` -----" 22199e_.2 Li 1 i 1._t 1 1„L.i_t I i 1 Jj [ 1 1 1 1 � nt i rr t �% N09° 4 7'27"E (R 14 DETAIL "A" Scale: 1"=20' 4 0 sill Q r0 o0 (\1� _1 LI U to r 1e o a. (U 0 v o DOC . NO. 2003- 765688 O.R. ,51 N09°52'50"E =� 1 8.22' ----*- N79°02'29"W 224.20' LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP09 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State AccQss Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ) FEET 0 22199-2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS •,41,m, DATE: 10-2 DISTRICT 8 1 4-1I REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FA*:. COUNTY R'iV ROU rE 91 SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEE 2 EX111141EA, PAGE 9 • P S O MAS EXHIBIT `Cl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22199-3 r 5 Temporary Copstruction Easement 6 APN's 118-250-027 & 028 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 lands described in the Deeds recorded May 9, 2001 as Document No. 2001-201209 and to September 30, 2003 as Document No. 2003-765688, both of Official Records of said t t County, described as follows: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Beginning at the southeasterly comer of the land described in said Document No. 2001- 201209; thence North 08°03'54" East 60.23 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 5529.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 12°41'34" East; thence westerly along said curve 228.31 feet through a central angle of 02°21'57"; thence North 72°32'48" West 117.65 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 597.86 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 20°03'06" East; thence westerly along said curve 106.82 feet through a central angle of 10° 14' 13" to a point on the westerly line of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688, said point being North 11°20'58" East 94.62 feet from the southwesterly corner of said land described in said Document No. 2001-201209; thence North 11°20'58" East 0.23 feet along said westerly line to the northwesterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688; thence North 11°20'58" East 1.77 feet along the westerly line of the land described in said Document No. 2001-201209 to a point thereon, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 599.86 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 09°49' 11 East; thence easterly along said curve 107.15 feet through a central angle of 10° 14'03"; thence South 72°32'53" East 117.41 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent PA2PTG010501V.SURVEY1LEGAIS122199_118-250-028_118-260-01aLegals122199-3 TCE.doc A/17/2012 Page 1 of 2 IEXHIBMA, PAGE 10 3 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2i 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS curve concave southerly having a radius of 5531.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 10°19'42" East; thence easterly along said curve 228.11 feet through a central angle of 02'21'47" to a point on said easterly line; thence South 08°03'54" West 2.01 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 905 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of: Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 8-/7 /2 Date P:12P"1110105011SURVGY1LEGA LS122199.118-230-028_118-260-0161Legals122199-3_TCE..Jnc 8/17/2012 Page 2 of 2, EXHIESDA, PAGE 11 • EXHIBIT cC2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-3 TCE MAUDE -CORONA I.LC 905 SO.F T. 118-250-027 & 028 20 /f N12°49'�{9"E , 42.;04' N78° 45'14`}W(R),.! (t. f ! I 1 i t i • M M IJ CO Un 0 C 0 z N20° 0314"E(R) C3 � 1S72°32 �U`�' iar L '— 1 1 7 41 3 E -- I �. 171 C 2 ___.^ � -L-CL / N72°32648 4N2 0 _ W _ -i _. ` % _- a---03'06 'E{R) N41 29n12E ��i 1'°58726—"E. Sly Right -of -Way/ Line of F7omono Street _,N77° 16'42"W(R) 372.59' ,7 1—,° f„..-r S72 14'50"E-`''�tf , 24.07' C6/ f S07° 46'08"W(RV CURVE DATA # RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 5529.00' 02°21'57" 228.31' C2 597.86' t0°14'13" 106.82' C 3 599.86' 10° 14'03" ) 07.1 5' C4 5531.00' 02°21'47" 228.11' C5 1775.00) 01028'33" 45.72' C6 65.00' 09°59'02" 11.33' DOC. NO. 2001 -201 209 O.R. POI? Jr PARCE1r 3 R.S, 46/31 1110° 19'42"E(R) SEE SHEET 2. DETAIL 'A" N79°02'29"W 224.20' ROUTE 91 N81 ° 54'27"W 1 231.37 \010° 19`37"E(R) RIVERSIDE FREEWAY co v 0 N N12° 41'28"E(R) 290 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning tR) indicates Radial Bearing ) Title to State r E r Access Prohibited 2 3 4 295 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zane 6. distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obta'n ground distances. Ail distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 22199-3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT C- 0 50 i00 200 300 PREPARED By: PS ® M A S DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FAQ: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY R I y ROUTE =31 SHEET PM SHEET NO. 5.6 TOTAL SHEETS EXHIEBT1A, PAGE 12 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-3 TCE MAUDE -CORONA LLC 905 SOS T. 118-250-021 & 028 . I 1 I M N09° 49'11"E(R) co ^n f / N58° 30'06"W /,�--- C3— � /) 34.65" r 2T 93y a 1 .7 7------. I ‘ ;— � N09° 48'53"E(R) / - E n"---` C�2 --- - _ 1 LI 1 t 1 i I 1 I LU J it I I 1 LLJ�J LLL_.LJI I �_1 t f J (JD DOC. NO. o ko 2003- 765688 "' O.R. N •Q ' , � �o � "-- i . --:; // l �'-`o Al -, 'E A ___ Na -5A'63 2001-201209 I , PORT' orf) DETAIL «A„ I•� !� a o -co 11J_L..LJ _., r_t •t t_1-�1 I \N09°52'S0"E �''~ 1 8.22' // DOC. NO. O.R. ON Jr PARCEL 3 iz.S. �}b/31 . SCO l e: 1 "=20' w ^ � _, '0 - 0 ° tr 178-250-028 r _ �z` I: —. . _ N79°02'29"W 224.20— LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPO3 Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radio' Bearing ( }Title to State I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on. CCs 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide 2 2 1. l l - J TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT by 0.999974 To to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I IMMEmem.1 MIIIMMWMMOI FFF7 0 to 20 40 64 PREPARED BY: DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FA#: PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHE 8 R!'I 91 7.b 2 c• EXHIE3T2A, PAGE 13 • Pomona Road t FEE 31,462 SF (Total Parch Area 240,4511 SF) Permanent Wall Footing Easement 3,425 SF wiz Temporary Construction Easement 905 SF Permanent Utility Easement 247 SF � r � * � � i * • pined Off -Ramp to Lincoln. _ __ ATTACHMENT 6 RESOLUTION NO. 13-017 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 117-070-029, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-070-029 (Ca'trans Parcel No. 22249), for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 17336.02100\7995488.1 84 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps, respectively, of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and • • 17336.02100\7995488.1 85 • • determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7995488.1 86 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission. "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7935050.1 EXHi1B8A, PAGE 1 PS OMAS 3 4 Ca'trans Parcel No. 222494 5 f Fee Acquisition 6 f APN 117-070-029 7 EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION It In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: tt t2 13 14 15 16 17 Containing 65 square feet. 18 19 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 21 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 22 23 See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 24 25 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 26 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007,00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 27 ' grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 28 ` combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 29 30 31 Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 08°00'04 East 3.98 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 32.84 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 33.25 feet along said southerly line to the Point of Beginning. PA2F1 9105011SURYENZGAl.S122249 APN_117-070.029U.egtls122249-1-Fea.doe 7/122012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIlelyk, PAGE 2 • J OMAS 1 2 Prepared under the direction of 5 7 /2-1Z 6 ' Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PM0105011SURVEYNLEGALS1222t9 APN— 117-020 02KAgalst22249-1-Fcc-da Pagc 2 of 7112J2012 EXIOOSOA, PAGE 3 • { ) EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-1 PARCEL 4 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. (1 17-070-027 65 SOST. 117-070-029 1 117-070-030 C0 G7 Z POB ? •°` ? 0 �L S86°42'10"E 281.76' PARCEL "A DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. 22.2: l SEA SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL Nt -' :3 588°46'304 117-070-028 264.40' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning Title to 5-tote + + s Access Prohibited I 50' NOTES Coordinotes and bearings ore on CC5 198312007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99%97476 to obtain ground distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22249-1 FEE ACOUiSlTION FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPAR£d BY: PSOMAS 5 Kw1 On Ctnlre Or:.e[ Sit. 700 SOn.O Ahe. CO'e10W0 07707 0)070,-73,3:1/14,546-1443 it Oxi DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF 540 F Att: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS s RIV 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIET2A, PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-t FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES. L.P 65 SO.FT. t17-070-029 FARCE'? 4 11 7-070-030 PARCEL "A'' DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. 1 io 584°20'56"E 32. LEGEND POB r ) 1 1 11 Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1981(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances ;and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. Al: distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 22249 1 FEE ACOOI SI TION FEET 0 5 10 20 30 PREPARED BY: O AS kettet+ Cent le Cle; ,� Ste. ?CO wry Arc vcrs.4ern:n §?aar DATE:07-12-12 REV.: EA: Of 540 FM: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHE£j 8 RIV 91 6.4 Z EXHIRSSA, PAGE 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `Br LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22249-2 Fee A,cenisition APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 13.93 feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 531'0T31" East 16.51 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 46.41 feet to a point on the easterly line of said lend; thence South 08°03'13" West 55.78 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 125 square feet. ee Exhibit `82' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2711G 10501ISURVEMEGAL5122244 APt1_117-070.629112gats\22249.2-Fee.dx 7/12/2012 Pap 1 oil EXHIniTI.A, PAGE 13 3 4 Prepared under the direction of f.. fg. r ? /2. a 6 '' Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 i P:12PTG0105011SURV EYILEGALS122249_AP1.1_117-070-029V-egals122249-2-Fee.doe 7l12r1012 Page 2 of 2 EXHlBff5I, PAGE 7 • EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-.2 _.l 1.1.1 v r a, FEE HALF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 1 1 7-070-027 ?w - ? �`tC,S\. 125 SOS T. 117-070-029 1 1 7-070-028 r w O o ,- to o z J 1 1 l l t 1_1 i. S86°A2'10"E 281.76' PARCEL "A- DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. S88° g6'39"\N 284.40' SE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 9 l RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning ( } Title to State to t t 1 Access Prohibited 50= 1-- w w QC z Q ►r, 1 M 7- 1 vrr ‘21Q I O NI POH NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Oistonces and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Alt distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22249-2 FEE ACM:M I -ION FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED 8v: PSOMAS i Fiue cnn Centre De4t Ste. MO WOO Ann f.Clifwn:n d7707 - tit 4P5t-7177it7,0t4S•8el3 tfa.1 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY TOTAL SHEETS 2 8 RIV ROUTE 91 SHEET PM 6.4 SHEET NO, 1 EXIGInA, PAGE 8 PARCEL* TITLE EXHIBIT B2 GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-2 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES. L.P 125 SO.FT. 117-070-029 � 'L ? rsk° �L 1 1 7-070— 028 586° 4 2' 10" E PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 01 49096 O.R. 3 )r\ \- / ��3' 2.5 10 ! S8$046'39"v1 281 .76' r� i222A9A2p 1453°017'31 "E 16.151' 1 13.93 264.40' P08 ( ) 1 I M f q ! a; 1^ 0 1. Q 1 in I ul «O 0 fto r- ° in u; co o s„'in RO 50` 1 LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY Point of Beginning Title to State M 7 t Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 198312007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distonces. All distonces ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEE! 0 22249-2 FEE ACUUISITIM Fonommi 10 20 40 60 PREPARED 811 DATE: 07-12-1Z REV.: PSOMAS 3 mutton toners Or;ve Ste. 200 Santo Ana, tot:7Arn;3 9210M {7747751-737]l17t4754tratt3 'Magi EA: OF540 FAs DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SiiEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEE 8 RIV 91 6.4 2 2 EXH113517A, PAGE 9 • • PS AS EXHIBIT `CV LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 CaBrans Pargei No. 22;49-3 5 Permanept Wall Footing EAsement 6 APN 117.070-029 8 i In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as to Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 3.98 feet 13 along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the Tale Point of 14 Beginning; thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to 15 a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 46.45 feet; thence South 01 °01' 15" East 16 4.30 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 14.45 17 i feet along said southerly line to a point thereon; thence North 84°20'56" West 32.84 feet 18 to the True Point of Beginning. 19 20 Containing 269 square feet. 21 22 See Exhibit 'C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 23 24 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 25 Systern of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 26 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 27 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 28 29 30 31 PA2FT0010501\SURVE'Y1L,EGA lS\22249„APN_117-070-02911.tpls122249-3-PE.doc 7/12/1012 rue1of2 EXHIBg81, PAGE 10 6 8 9 10 11 12 !3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 x1 PS MAS Prepared under the direction of 7-rz-/2 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG010501iSURVEY\LWA15122249 APN_117-070-029iLeg+1s122249-3-PE.doe Page 2of2 7'1212012 EXHIBn( , PAGE 11 • EXHIBIT C2 AREA PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR APN 22249-3 PARCEL 4 117-070-030 w a— a z TP08 PE HAGF ENTERPRISES. L.P. 11 17-070-0271 PA " 269 SO.F T . �,5 �L3~ / {� 2 Y . ?p,tO\ S86° 42'10"E r222.4°` MD P4g �FOR DE ► + 588TAIL2 ° 46'39 w 2g4.40 1 281 .76' PARCEL "A" OOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. Itlt 0 0' 3 117-070-029 1 1 7-070-0281 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning PO8 Point of Beginning Title to State + 1 + + Access Prohibited C ) i i I i f,'wM r o 1 50' w Lu Cc V) z NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distonces. All distonces are in feet unless otherwise noted. 222493 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PS ® M A S woro. or:..e SM. Aaa a Sla Ana tp,;forn:o.;1707 j7,a75i437)rfl;at5lYIIlII3 flax} DATE: 07-12-12REV.: EA: OF540 FA14: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS; 8 R1V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHI4168, PAGE 12 PARCEL# 22249-3 PARCEL 4 0 rol EXHIBIT C2 TITLE GRANTOR ` PE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. AREA 269 SOFT. PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. APN 117-070-029 (' r ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TP08 True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 7 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinotes and bearings ore on CCS 1993{2007.001 Zone 6. distances and stotioning ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. Atl distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: P ,S ® A S 3 Sutton Centre Hive' Ste. 100 Sens Ina fol.to•n:e 117707 t714j751-7373,M 4 $545.8083 1r0.1 22249 3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT FEET 0 5 10 20 30 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.. EA: OF540 DISTRICT 8 COUNTY R1V ROUTE 91 SHEET PEA 6.4 NO. SHEET FA*: SHEE 2 EXHIEIflyi, PAGE 13 • 3 4 5 6 8 9 to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `D1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca'trans Parcel No. 22249-4 Temporary Coistrnction Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly comer of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 9.99 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 45.50 feet; thence South 01 °01'15" East 6.04 feet; thence North 84°20'56" West 46.45 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 276 square feet. See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described, The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG(110501\SURVEYiLE0AIS122249 APN_I 17-070.029\Lesab122249.44C&doe Page 1 of 2 7/12/2012 EXHIB'Dg, PAGE 14 PSOMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 7 /2-i2 6 =Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 P:12PTGotoso ultVEYUEGAtS‘22249 APN_117-070-0291.egals122249-4-TCE.Aoc 7/12/1012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIE9ID8, PAGE 15 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-4 TCE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L,P 276 SO.F "r. 1 17-070-029 7 17-070-030 w o -- 0".. d TPO - 117-070-027 7J�?, Y 1 Kki 586° 42'10"E 281 .76' PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. ._..� 588° 46'39°14 1.1itigulstti POB SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL L117-070-028 284.40' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB POB C i (trt1 True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited i 1 I I Lu W 1 C i cn ; z I I NOTES Coordinates and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances Ond stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distonces. Ait distonces ore in feet unless otherwise noted, FEET 0 22249-4 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25 50 )00 50 PREPARED BY: P S O M S kutton Centre 0r4e Ste. 200 Sante Ann, C0t;forni0 9270/ 1/107$;-7l73,17t435.5•Sep'. 1,04 DATE: 07-12-12 REv.: EA: 0F540 F Ate= DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBM, PAGE 16 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-4 6.01 TPOB 9.99' TCE N08°00104"E 111.91' HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. U)1.1))) (2 2'2'4j 276 SOFT, PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. 1I7-070-029 3' I !L P ,�! 10`� �a 584°20'56"E 45.50' N84°20'56"W )_11 1 1 1 1 ) 1 f see 46.39"N 46.45' 284.40 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB POB t 1 l t l i True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and "bearings are on CCS 1993(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Ail distances ore in feet unless otherwise not PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 t+ut fan Centre Drive, Ste. 700 Santa Anc Cot:taretic 97707 01,0791-i771117141545-444) (fey) 22249-4 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT noted. FEET 0 0AIE: 07-12-12 REV.: DISTRICT 8 COUNTY RIV ROUTE a1 10 20 EA: OF 540 SHEET PM 6.4 SO 1 ° 01' 15`E 6.04' FAA: SHEET NO. 2 30 TOTAL SHEETAlk 2 lip EXHfB1105, PAGE 17 POMS E Cffi$1T `EV LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Ca'trans Parcel No. 22249-5 5 Tenworary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-070-029 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2046 as 10 Document No. 2006-01490% of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 13.93 13 feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True 14 Point of Beginning; thence South 88°4619" West 14.21 feet continuing along said 15 southerly line to a point thereon; thence North 03°04'21" East 28.93 feet; thence South 16 86°28'44" East 24.04 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 63.02 feet to a point on the 17 northerly line of said land; thence South 86°42'10" East 3.53 feet along said northerly 18 line to the northeasterly corner of said land; thence South 08°03'13" West 33.65 feet 19 along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 10°35'59" West 46.41 20 feet; thence South 53°0731" West 16.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 21 22 Containing 994 square feet 23 24 See Exhibit 'E2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 25 26 27 28 29 3o 31 • The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG0105011SURVEY\LEGALS522249 APN 117410 429ALegal5122249-S-TCE.doc 7/12/2412 Page 1 or2 EXHIPI168, PAGE 18 PSOMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 6 Brian E. Bullock, PJS 5260 Date 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PA2PTGbi0S011SURYEYIL.EGAL$‘22249 APN 117-070.0291L.egah122249.3-TCE:doc VI2/2012 Page 2or2 EXHIBIT) PAGE 19 • EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-5 TCE HALF ENTERPRISES, L P. 994 SQ.FT. 117-070-029 LL a 1 1 7-070-030 w o 1 1 7-070-027 1 P I-- 0 re ?Nrki 1 1.7-070-028 1 50' 1 I I cap t 1 .. 1 I w i # 4..1 i Z f �\ I S86° 42' 10"I~ 261 .76' ! 1 PARCEL "A" �/ # M l Q N1 DOC.#2006- o i 0149096 O.R. I d'o oil o9 (22249-5 -. ( r .� of vy POB TPOB S86° 46' 39` w SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOe POB ) J 11 l l True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to Stote AcceSS Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on GCS 1983(2007.00) zone 6. Distances and Stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground distances. Alt distances ore in feet unless Otherwise noted. FEET 0 22249-5 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25 50 too T50 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 IkH+eo Cenlie Pehe Ste. 700 Sonto Ana. Col:/orn:o 07701 {l44051-7373it714nas.4eel Ir04 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF 540 FAlt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS RIV 91 6.4 1 2 EXHI9168, PAGE 20 C 3 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-5 TCE HALF ENTERPRISES, L.P. i 1 7-070-028 S86°42'10"E PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006 0149096 O.R. ?�� ,— 3 3'2,5 2 S88° 46' 39"W 281 .76' 994 SO.ET. S86°28'44"E 24.04 _„ 1.4 { ii (22249— 5) "`j .= Q A�� rel ° ° C1 h� Z 284.40' LEGEND Tp0B True Point of Beginning A0B Point of Beginning Title to Stote i)) i t Access Prohibited 14.2 T POB, M M m co S08°03'13" w 13.93` 117-070-029 3.53' POB 50' E— Lu w or to z ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY NOTES Coardinotes and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22249-5 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: p A S 3 Murton Centre oriue, sic. too (014)75�7373/17 25+5.3e®3 (km) DATE: 07- DISTRICT 8 2-12 REV.: COUNTY RIV ROUTE 91 EA: OF5A0 SHEET PEA 6.4 FA*: SHEET NO. 2 TOTAL SHEET 2 EXHIBM, PAGE 21 Permanent Wall Footing Easement 269 SF Temporary Construction Easement 1,270 SF ATTACHMENT 7 RESOLUTION NO. 13-018 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 117-111-001, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire fee and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-111-001 (Ca!trans Parcel No. 22261) for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owners were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 17336.02100\7995474.1 111 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee and temporary construction easement interests in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps, respectively, of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and • 17336.02100\7995474.1 112 • • determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7995474.1 113 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fcc," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7984570 1 ExHierl A, (PAGE 1 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22261-1 5 Fee Acquisition 6 APN 117-111-001 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel 1 in each of the deeds recorded June 22, 2000 as Document No. 10 2000-241350 and July 6, 2007 as Document No. 2007-0441129, of Official Records of l 1 said County, described as follows: 12 13 Beginning at the intersection of the existing northerly right of way line of Third Street, 14 said line lying 30.00 feet northerly of and perpendicularly distant from the original 15 centerline thereof, with the original centerline of the north -south alley in Block 177 of the 16 plat of "South Riverside Town Site" as said block is shown on the map filed in Book 9 of 17 Maps, Page 8, San Bemardino County Records, said point also being the southeasterly 18 corner of said land; thence North 81°57'09" West 89.41 feet along a portion of the 19 southerly line of said land to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°57'09" West 20 8.51 feet continuing along last said line to a point thereon, said point being the beginning 21 of a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence northwesterly 22 i along a portion of the general westerly line of said land and said curve 31.42 feet through 23 a central angle of 90°00'21 "; thence North 08°03'12" East 12.14 feet continuing along last 24 said general westerly line to the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly having a 25 radius of 40.00 feet; thence northeasterly along last said general westerly line and said 26 curve 32.11 feet through a central angle of 45°59'29" to a point thereon; thence South 27 10°10'50" West 42.33 feet; thence South 35°48'26" East 25.80 feet to the True Point of 28 j Beginning. 29 30 Containing 653 square feet. 31 PA2PTG010501\SURVEIALEGALS\22261 APN_117-111-001\Legals\22261-1_FEE-R1_d°c 5/10/2012 Page 1 of EXHirt, PAGE 2 S OMAS See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 9 Prepared under the direction of 10 ll 12 - Gr Kt•C-YrrX 13 j Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 lZ Date P:12PTG0105OilSURVEYII.EGA1.51L261_APN 117-111-0011Legels122261-f doe 5/10/2012 Page 2 of EXHir tt, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22261-1 FEE JAMESON / MELLOR 653 SOFT. 117-111-001 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH N35°57119"W (R) Cl 40.00' 45°59'29" 32.11' 1 G R=40.00' L=62.82'�� S81 °57'33"E 77.94' - A=89° 59'1 5" W Qc PROPOSED- �' i Lu PROPOSE i- R /W ° N08 d3 12 E !" . 3 r, (v� --.. �� DOC . NOS. 2000- 241 350 & ., 2007-0441129 O.R. �; N FOR.. Jr J-tS '' 15- 1 6; 1 %; A 18 ElLOCN 1 I l , M > _.. _ (Ni O o ( �_.,.. 1 2.1 4 222"61 '1 j.,.._m. EXISTING R/W- k in M . a.. 9 l 3 o SAN 8r Ri`1ARO 11NO CO., � S35°48'26„E o \\25.80' `r) r(- R=20.00' 189.41' L=31 .42' l N81 ° 57'09"W 97.92' POB r_._. v_._ _ :__-_.� _ THIRD 1 E Z 8.51 " LL _._a_ i s ) _ — —�— -- ._ _._.__e. . — —, —.STREET -4 ►M i 'yr y ...+........... ) 1 1 7- 1 14-01 1 O� r 1 ld NV, LEGEND ELOCX 1 6 ; m,e, 9 2 _ -J J i' '� POB lndicotes Point Of Beginning TP00 lndicotes True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Rodiol Bearing SAN Sr RNARD1 NO CO. PQ C ) Title to Stote NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 6 1— 1 FEE ACOU1S1T10N __...,_.__ distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ` FEET 0 15 30 60 90 ' PREPARED BY: DATE: 11-03-11 REV.:2; 05-09-12 EA: OF540 FAl*: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste, 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS &onto Ana Cotitornio 92707 (7F4)751-7373/(7141545.8883-(Foxi - 8 R I V 91 L 6.5 1 _ 1 1 `J' PAGE 4 PS OMAS EXHIBIT Tr LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22261-2 Temporary Construction Easement APN l 17-111-001 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 I land described as Parcel 1 in each of the deeds recorded June 22, 2000 as Document No. 10 2000-241350 and July 6, 2007 as Document No. 2007-0441129, of Official Records of t t said County, described as follows: 12 13 Beginning at the intersection of the existing northerly right of way line of Third Street, 14 G said line lying 30.00 feet northerly of and perpendicularly distant from the original 15 centerline thereof, with the original centerline of the north -south alley in Block 177 of the 16 plat of "South Riverside Town Site" as said block is shown on the map filed in Book 9 of 17 Maps, Page 8, San Bernardino County Records, said point also being the southeasterly 18 comer of said land; thence North 81°57'09" West 89.41 feet along a portion of the 19 southerly line of said land to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 35°48'26" West 20 25.80 feet; thence North 10° 10'50" East 42.33 feet to a point on the general westerly line 21 of said land; said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave 22 southeasterly having a radius of 40.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 23 35°57'19" West; thence northeasterly along said general westerly line and said curve 24 13.69 feet through a central angle of 19°36'15"; thence South 23°31'54" East 10.36 feet; 25 thence South 68°31'01" West 7.90 feet; thence South 10°10'50" West 33.75 feet; thence 26 South 35°48'25" East 22.91 feet; thence South 81 °57'09" East 32.02 feet; thence South 27 08°02'51" West 5.60 feet to a point on said southerly line; thence North 81 °57'09" West 28 40.16 feet along a portion of said southerly line to the True Point of Beginning. 29 30 Containing 932 square feet. 31 PA2PTG010501LSURVEYILEGALS122261_APN_117-111-0011Legals122261-2 TCE.doc 5/82012 Page 1 of 2 EXHI�Ix t, PAGE 5 PSOMAs See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3 The distances described herein are grid distances andare based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Prepared under the direction of E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 2- P:12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122261 APN 117-I11-0111Legais122261-2 TCFdo 5/8/2012 — — Page 2 of 2 MINIM, PACE 6 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22261-2 TCE JAMESON / MELLOR 932 SO.FT. 117-111-001 N16°21'03"W (R) R=40.00' L=1 3.69' ------) A=19°36'15" N35°57'19"W (R) °57'33"E S81 77.94' R=40.00' L=62.82" I~ A=89 59 15 w i QC PROPOSED L3 DOC. NOS. 2000- 241 350 & ►� L4 2007-0441 1 29 O.R. N N ' 1— R/W U) N08°03'1 2"E 12.14' N `' +� ) FOR. Or LOTS '`. 15; 1 ; 1 / ; ? i a BLOCK 1 7 7; M M,84 9 J d r3 o r`_ ' _22261 2 SAN Br RNA RD 1 NO CO., [. EXISTING R/W-- �� ��- L7 L8 N R=20.00` N. 40.16' 49.25' L=31 .42' N81 ° 57'09"W 89.41 ' " `' - POB i A=90°00'21 97.92' - T POB � (.i i I—____-____..__----------_______._- ? -----------._�___-..-.__._..____.-_ THIRD ..... STREET LINE DATA Z BEARING DISTANCE , Q N\ L1 N35°48'26"W 25.80' f �A'0 L2 N10° 10'50"E 42.33' ? pp C ,1'1 L 3 S23° 31 '54"E 10.36' ' >- a 1 1 L 4 568° 31 '01 "W 7.90' LEGEND L5 510°10`50"W 33.75` �� POB indicates Point Of Beginning L6 S35°48'25"E 22.91 ' # TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radios Bearing L7 581 °57'09"E 32.02' ' "W C ) Title to State L8 S08°02'51 5.60' NOTES Coordinotes and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 V 1- TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 2 EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: DATE: 11-03-11 REV.:2; 05-09-12 EA: OF540 FAs: PSOMAS 3 Hatton Centre Orive•, Ste. 200. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS Sonto Ano, CW ifornia 92707- (714)751-7373troxl 8 p R:,014)545.5883 I V 91 6.5 - 1 1_ - . • • • Jameson -Mellor 117-111-001 117-111-002 FEE 653 SF (Total Parcel Area 19,545t SF) Temporary Construction Easement 932 SF 125 ATTACHMENT 8 RESOLUTION NO. 13-019 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 117-270-001, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire fee and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 1 17-270-001 (Caltrans Parcel No. 22274) for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 126 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee and temporary construction easement interests in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions, and plat maps, respectively, of the interests to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and • • 17336.0210017995485.1 127 • • • determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 128 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of ROTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7984258,1 EXHIei 6, PAGE 1 PS i EXHIBIT `Al' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Ca[trans Parcel No. 22274-1 5 Fee acquisition 6 APN 117-270-001 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in the Corporation Grant Deed recorded June 29, 2011 as Document No. io 2011-0287424 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southerly terminus of that certain course shown as 13 "North 08°09'37" East, 194.03 feet" on the Record of Survey filed in Book 64, Page 37 14 of Records of Survey in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, said course 15 having a bearing of North 08°08'22" East for the purpose of this description; thence along 16 said course North 08°08'22" East 89.24 feet; thence South 79°28'45" East 120.46 feet to 17 the beginning of a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 39.00 feet; thence 18 easterly and northeasterly 47.90 feet along said curve through a central angle of 19 70'22'09" to the easterly line of the land shown on said Record of Survey; thence along 20 the easterly, southeasterly and southerly lines of said land the following four courses: 21 1. South 08°10'36" West 107.22 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 22 northwesterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; 23 2 Southwesterly and westerly 43.72 feet along said curve through a central angle of i 24 100° 11'47"; 25 3. North 71°37'37" West 130.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave 26 southwesterly having a radius of 1030.00 feet; 27 4 Northwesterly 0.07 feet along said curve tluough a central angle of 00°00'15 to 28 the Point of Beginning. 29 30 Contains 15914 square feet 31 MA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22274_APN_117-270-0011Legals\22274-I.docx Page 1 of 2 3/2/2012 EXHI111±, PAGE 2 PS t 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. AS 6 7 See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made apart hereon. 8 9 10 11 12 Prepared under the direction of: 13 Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 Date 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Ni:12PTG010501\.SURVEY\LEGALS\22274 —APN 1 17-270-001\Legals\22274-l.docx Page 2 of 3/2/201'? EXHIIVIII, PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22274-1 FEE PRANAV Y. DESA1 15914 SO.FT. 117-270-001 _ z S7go `� 1 119-320-029 15965"k- o `'�--, . S?gol .' I 59 68 S E1 _ „BNSF 'co. 0 r OF LOTS -!! 1 1 R4/C,gOq� 119-320-030 PM 21454 _) r',M.2, 1 3 PG, 13 jT�'�:JR ('�(' (DO AND .��f'-3 I I N .rJL.001l N� N r 1121.--Ni SOJ7r! RIVERSIDE LAND AND WATER GO. ►, m,b1, 9; PG.6 (S,S Co.) i DOC. NO.201 1-0287424 a FOR, LOT 3 : DATED: 06/29/201 1 i 21 N , 13'� ~ rJ, 1 V .d '-' N81°8 27, ii,5� fi'1I31 30' 'w (S,S Co.) 0 30. 2„wcc 52 1 22274 =.1 t rn o 1 1 7-270-002 w - 11 7-270-005 -..1 o POR . Jr ,turn ) Q r� LOTS 3%- 39 °3 • _ -- -- -- -- .,-, o , a SEE SHEET 2 o V i °1 /0o°1 L 00 DETAIL A — / z g3t72-f c„ '\ :Q� 100° . P08 . .. .. I - An _ _ `,N7II0,6 , ,: i , , / i" PROPOSED R/W FR�NTq� ' `'W i. cE �-.,. R040 - 1~ XIS TING R/W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C/L STATIONING 355 POB Indicotes Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radial Beoring 35�.�.�„�---.y..—`� 357"�"�----�� 358 ( ) Title to State 359 Jill I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 4- 1 FEE ACOUISITION I 4 distonces. Ail distonces ore in feet ' unless otherwise noted. FEET 4 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: DATE: 3-7-12 REV.: 3-14-12 EA: OF540 FA#: PSOMAS 3 Hutton .Centre OrFve Ste. 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS Sanc71i4)�S1 7373/014))sas saes (Fox) 8 R I V .HK.! 9 1 .. • 6.7 1 2 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22274-1 FEE PRANAV Y. DESAI 15914 SO.FT. 117-270-001 1117-270-0021 RJR, OF L OIS 37_39 �222-.7'4= Vim' N8°08'22"E 89.24' DETAIL"B" w N ° co N o, 1 O o co opFROA/7 aa ?OR, OF ► ND 3-4-37 �J�TS 5- 1 I �t N. BLOCK n to o AND R 1 V �AND_ ER RS 1 r1E +n to M,B, 9; PG, 6 (S,B, Co, 3 iv "to :" DOC. NO.2011-0287424 M o DATED: 06/29/2011 0 0 co z R S, 6 4/31 ' 559°50'54"E (R) S790289S `E N?1 ° S1 8°22'08"W (R) L=0.07' 3T 37W R=1030.00' A-0°00'15 DETAIL"B NO SCALE LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicotes Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 ( Access Prohibited 13o-63- DETAIL ZO M O 0 CO It 0 30' i • • NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: P5 O M A S 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Sonia Ano,-Colifornio 92707-- -- (714)751-7373/(714)545-8883 (Pox) 22274-1 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 25 50 DATE:3-7-12 REV.: 3-14-12 100 EA: OF540 FAn: 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 mentirstrrPokee-o 6.7 2 2 IPS0 1 EXHIBIT `BI' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22274-2 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 117-270-001 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 ! land described in the Corporation Grant Deed recorded June 29, 2011 as Document No. 10 2011-0287424 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southerly terminus of that certain course having the bearing and 13 distance of "North 08°09'37" East, 194.03 feet" as shown on the Record of Survey filed 14 in Book 64, Page 37 of Records of Survey in the Office of the County Recorder of said 15 County, said course having a bearing of North 08°08'22" Fast for the purpose of this 16 description; thence along said course North 08°08'22" East 89.24 feet to the True Point r 17 ; of Beginning; thence South 79°28'45" East 120.46 feet to the beginning of a curve 18 concave northwesterly having a radius of 39.00 feet; thence easterly and northeasterly 19 47.90 feet along said curve duough a central angle of 70°22'09" to the easterly line of the 20 land shown on said Record of Survey; thence North 08° 10'36" East 12.82 feet along said 21 easterly line; thence leaving said easterly line South 25°50'00" West 9.28 feet to the 22 beginning of a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 35.00 feet; thence 23 southerly and southwesterly 45.62 feet along said curve tluough a central angle of 24 74°41' 15"; thence North 79°28'45" West 120.63 feet to said course having the bearing 25 and distance of "North 08°09'37" East, 194.03 feet"; thence South 08°08'22" West 26 4.00 feet along said course to the True Point of Beginning. 27 28 Contains 687 square feet 29 30 31 M:\2PT'G010501\SURVEY\LEGALS122274APN 117-270-001\Legals\22274-2.docx 3/2/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIlrat, PAGE 6 PS O The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 8 9 Prepared under the direction of: t0 Il 12 3- 14, 13 Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 Date 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 MA2PTGoi050RSURVEY\LEGALS122274 APN 117-270-0011Lega1s\22274-2.docx Page 2of2 3/2/2012 EXHIllit5t, PAGE i< EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22274-2 TCE PRANAV Y. DESAI 687 SOFT. 117-270-001 ---__ i119-320-029 I59 g85'E o _ IS9&8S _BNsfi1,/col" 'rd PUR , or L UTS 5- 1 1 R4/4,Q„p�`� �,_ � o� AND 3'1-3 % IN SLUG; ""a"e0 1 19- 320-030 N I `''` z SUl1-f;-I R 1 �/r r�S 1 Dr LAND AND WATER Do, ►_ ' M,O, 9; PG,b (S,ri, Co..) `f-° W DOC. NO.201 1-0287424 a POR, LOT 3 PM 21454 , DATED: 06/29/201 1 M ~ B K, 73 P,1111,B, 143 +,) W w M,S, 9;PG,b P G , 13 >- ' 1 $ 27' R , S , 64/37 � � y o 30. N8t g2,12„W 30' � (S,E1 Go,) ' '22274":-2 pl 1 1 7-270-002 ,, Ili � 117-270-005 0 r PJR , or N- c N LOTS 37-3 3�o _—— ___— 0 4 aPo a=I oc2�� SEE SHEET 2 '47" POB R�25•00' DETAIL A _ ,,,, f- ---- --- T P 0 B _� �, SEE SHEET 2 `�-ING7I'a30.6, PROPOSED R/W 1 \‘ \DETAILB F'3 R0/v7-,, E `�`Rp4o EXISTNR/w ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND CA.. STATIONING 355 POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) indicates Radio! Bearing 356 357 ---, 358 `�--�- ( ) Title to State 359 J 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground +�/ 2 2 2 / 4 - 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distonces. All distances ore in feet I unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: DATE:3-7-12 REV.: 3-14-12 EA: OF540 FA#: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre 200 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS Sonia 1no,, California ia92707 (7141751-7373/M 4)545.0M (Fax) 8 R I V 91 5.7 1 2 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22274--2 TCE PRANAV Y. DESAI 687 SO.FT. 117-270-001 FOR, OF LOTS 5- 1 1 S AND 3 4-33 IN SLOCK n g n 1 r` SOUTW RI Vr RSI DE 1117-270-0021 o LAND AND WATER CO, 3. -- M,E1, )y PG., 6 `SarJ~'., Co,) rD^ POR, OF LOTS w DOC. N0.2011-0287424 oQ I 3 -39 N DATED: 06/29/2011 N o R , S 6'r/.� J S25° 50'00"W co R=35.00' 9.28' S8°08'22"W 4.00' z A=74°41 '1 5" N8°10'36HE L=45.62' 12.82' _ - °28 TPOB `-yS7g028�- -_-- S`W �20.63- / __ -_ _--_ 5 S 9°50'S4"E IRI N8°08'22"E 89.24' 120.46, -` 3 22274-2 d' '� R=39.00' - W 0=70°22'09„ Miu POB L=47.90' ON - -� J PROPOSED R/W 0 cc -" - ~ � R=25.00' 0l W DETAIL��B" ''�--._— > A=100°11'47" a • cocv o � coF z S18°22'08"W (R) \ 3�"W 3�• 63' R0NTAC f N7/ ° Rp4p 37,37 L=0.07' W R=1030.00' 3Q• 63 - A=0°00'1 5" DETAIL"B" DETAIL "A" NO SCALE LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TP08 indicates True Point Of Beginhing (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State ) 1 1 I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin ground 2 2,2 7 4 - 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I plamou FEET 0 25 50 100 200 • PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 button Centre Drive Ste 200 Santo ago, Curitoroin 92707 (Ti4(751-7]T3/(714)545-866-BBB] (iOx > DATE: 3-7- 2 REV.: 3-14-12 EA: OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO- .TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 9 1 6.7 2 2 f 0 • • amp FEE 15,914 SF (Total Parcel Area 90,169± SF) a- - Temporary Construction Easement 687 SF • • • ATTACHMENT 9 RESOLUTION NO. 13-020 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 117-270-009, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) proposes to acquire a fee interest in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-270-009 (Ca!trans Parcel No. 22295) for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday; July 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owners were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, RCTC's construction of the Project will leave a portion of APN 1 17-270-009 as a remnant parcel, and RCTC is acquiring that portion of APN 1 17- 270-009 as a remnant parcel, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. 17336.02100\7995451.1 141 Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee interest in the property to be acquired is for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal description and map, respectively, of the interest to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal` descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said • 17336.02100\7995451.1 142 • • existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession pf and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 173 3 6.02100\79954 51.1 143 • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel A: That portion of the South one-half of Lot 3 in Block 73 of the Lands of the South Riverside Land and Water Company and of Pearl Street (60 feet wide) abandoned, all as shown on map thereof on file in Book 9 page(s) 6 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence North 00° 33' 22" East along the Easterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 151.43 feet to a point of non -tangency in the curved Southerly line of the parcel of land conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded January 20, 1959 as Instrument No. 4752, in Book 2399 page(s) 419 of Official Records of Riverside County, said curved Southerly line being concave Northerly and having a radius of 6,000 feet; thence Westerly along the arc of said curved Southerly line from an initial radial line bearing North 00° 24' 14" East through a central angle of 02 50' 35" a distance of 297.72 feet to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 50 feet; thence Westerly, Southwesterly, Southerly and Southeasterly along the arc of said reverse curve through a central angle of 122 25' 11" a distance of 106.83 feet to a point of reverse curvature with the curved Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard, 100 feet wide, as shown on said map, last said curve being concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 2,376.85 feet; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curved Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard through a central angle of 02° 15' 36" a distance of 93.75 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 3; thence South 89° 15' 24" East along said Southerly line a distance of 298.50 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 117-270-009-7 Parcel B: Parcel 1, in the City of Riverside, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 23, Page 70 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. Except therefrom that portion thereof lying below a depth of 500 feet, measured vertically, from the contour of the surface of said property; however, Grantor, or its successors and assigns, shall not have the right for any purpose whatsoever to enter upon, into or through the surface of said property or any part thereof lying between said surface and 500 feet below said surface, as more particularly set forth by the certain document recorded September 18, 1985 as Instrument No. 209628 of Official Records. Assessor's Parcel Number 117-270-018-5 17336.021007979123.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 145 •, 1- • • POR. CITY OF CORONA (R?R. SEC. 30, T. 3S.R. 6 W, & RJR SOUTH R/V. LAND AND WATER CO. 11.1 1, .., . R/VER ,Dl11, f FRYAY RT 9/ `C' f 1 �l Lot 3 .�, 'I- f � r AN: Ba. 73 �IN 1 ). 71 0\I "1' 0 I. ISA. AC. T97 4 SRC 'tri-!J'f 4.1 /97. free. It LUTA mrr AVM RJ &VW RS.V/Cl RS N/Jr ASSESSOR'S MAP 8K. //7 fir. 27 R/VERS/DE COUNTY, CAL/f. T-�•> ��H7c F� �//� _ SRC VT-SS-roR-• /� fU I�`.,7: AftR Mr .S. S/ *K. La to T.R. A. 4/8 M.Q 9/6, 8 S.B. South Riverside Land 8 Water Co. //42- 43 Assessors Map No. 3/ P, M. 23/70 //T-27 f- zs S£PT. 1974 / "., aw, • • • 149 7/10/2013 t .�11 p tOJEC t FAST FORWARD scion A: :A THE COMMISSION IS REQUESTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS : 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. wvkl 1 7/10/2013 dwrtersli�p Date:of Offer 1 Corona Dynasty..5.oites :lnr, December 9, 2011 2 Elster August :12,•2011 3 Webb •April 25 2013 4 United Recitals August 31, 2012 5 Maude -Corona April 15, 2013 f NAGS ?anUary 4, 2013 r.p0.ceriboe 14, 2012 Ma :123, 2012 Marsh 1.2012 In Person Phone No. Ownership Meetings Mailings Contacts E-Mails Total 1 Corona Dynasty 7 15 9 14 44 :. 2 Eister 35 3 35:.. 46 119 3 Webb 6 3 7 0 16 4:: United Rentals::: 4 3 4:: 9 20'. =:5 Maude -Corona 3 4 b 4 17 <6 . FIAGF 1 5 "20 1 27 7 , `Jameson-Mlor4 :: 9 2 7 20 38 8 Desai 21 2" 6 3 32 9 MacArthur 4 2 28 20 54 These numbers do not include contacts made with legal counsel, which in some cases has been extensive. 2 7/10/2013 0 9 FRO rECT FAST FORWARD THE COMMISSION ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. e11:TROJECT ' FAST FORWARD PARCEL 1 3 7/10/2013 v� p F ECT, 7 AST FORWARO • Currently occupied by a hotel. • The offer of Just Compensation to acquire was presented on December 9, 2011. • Negotiations have been ongoing since December 9, 2011. • There have been 7 meetings, 9 phone calls, 14 e iVs and 'wvk16! 15 mailings have occurred to attempt to settle this acquisition. • The owner has executed a Possession and Use Agreement with the Commission. 4 7/10/2013 5 7/10/2013 se 91 FROJEcT FAST FORWARD RcTC • Currently Del Taco fast food restaurant. • The owner expressed interest in a remnant piece of another acquisition on Frontage Road for a replacement site. Site would require approvals from tenant, Del Taco corporate, City, others, likely requiring a long time to resolve. • The Commission attempted to negotiate a settlement; however, the property owner is not willing to settle until a suitable replacement site is found. Many (> 100) meetings, phone calls or emails were made in attempts to reach settlement to date. 6 7/10/2013 RC ��RoJEc� FAST POAWASO • Currently an outdoor ornamental sculpture retail facility. • The offer of Just Compensation for a full acquisition was presented January 18; 2012. • At property owner's request, an offer of Just Compensation for a partial acquisition was presented on April 2` ,M13• :................_. • The owner's attorney, John Murphy, has not expressed any concerns or questions related to the project's design. • Seven documented phone calls were made to the owner and or his attorney; 6 meetings were held, and 3 mailings have occurred. • The Commission attempted to negotiate a settlement, however the property owner has requested to go directly to a Resolution of Necessity. 7 7/10/2013 8 7/10/2013 pROJEc� FAST i*MAIM • Currently a construction equipment rental yard. • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on August 31, 2012. • An updated appraisal was performed and a revised offer was presented May 8, 2013. The revised offer increased by $500 due to the permanent wall footing easement duration changing from 6 to 12 months. • The owner's representative has not expressed any concerns or questions related to the project's design. • There have been 4 meetings, 4 phone calls, 9 emails and 3 mailings over the past 11 months in an attempt to settle this acquisition. • The Commission attempted to negotiate a settlement, however an agreement has not been reached. 9 7/10/2013 91 Ro3ca FAST FORWAFO Cora'` rc • Currently a car dealership (Honda Cars of Corona). • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on April 15, 2013. • The parcel's owner is represented by Murphy & Evertz. • The Commission attempted to negotiate a settlement, however Murphy & Evertz sent a letter dated May 22, 2013 that declined the partial acquisition offer and asked to seek a Resolution of Necessity. 10 7/10/2013 11 7/10/2013 9 pROJEC1 FAST FORWARD • Currently occupied by Meineke Car Care Center • The Commission attempted to communicate with the property owner's attorney to negotiate, however the property owner's attorney has not been responsive. • The lack of response from the owner's attorney, Mark Sabbah, began before the offer was presented. Four phone calls were made to the owner's attorney to request a meeting time to present the offer. • Five follow-up phone calls were made as well a certified letter to request the Signed Receipt of Offer Letter. 9,'pRoJECT A5t FORWARD • Since the Offer Package was presented, 6 follow-up phone calls were made by the agent, and 4 certified mailings have been sent with no response with regard to negotiations. • The attorney, Mr. Sabbah, did return the OPC Project Manager's call to indicate he would like to install a billboard at this location; he stated this was the reason for the delay. 12 7/10/2013 91,:fROJECT 411 Mai 7 PVier 'mask as - Illsoczw 1 4410 *ad Sir sas J. 11111~, IihasMo ' _ • _ .ii 114410110111.11114ft I L.FL a-/t =MI 1411.11.11111% OWN.111011111*Selose SUP * 6 • • 11411.411.11 114 ' v • ir- -1411 13 7/10/2013 ST FOPW1070 • Currently a Del Taco fast food restaurant. • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on December 14, 2012. • A 1st Level Review Meeting was held on May 14, 2013,.and the owner requested a different mitigation plan concept. • The owner's mitigation plan is currently in review at the city of Corona. Anticipated conceptual approval expected by July 2013. • Since offer was made, 13 meetings and or phone calls were made to the owner and or his attorney attempting to negotiate a settlement. There were many more attempts to communicate with the property owner. A settlement has not been reached. 14 7/10/2013 s pRoJEcT FAST FORWARD" • Currently light manufacturing use (Designer Plastics): vacant portion of parcel being acquired currently used for storage. • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on May 23, 2012. • At meeting on May 15, 2013, owner requested an exchange for the Rodriguez parcel, adjacent to the subject parcel. • Since offer was made, 27 meetings or phone calls were made to the owner attempting to negotiate a settlement. A settlement has not been reached. • The property owner has requested that the Commission seek a Resolution of Necessity. 15 7/10/2013 16 7/10/2013 91 ROJEGT 1 FAST FORW4P0 • Currently occupied by two businesses: automobile repair (Z Performance) & RV repair & rental (RV Family Adventures) • The offer of Just Compensation was presented on March 21, 2012. Full fee acquisition of entire parcel for the freeway and a utility easement. • Property to the south is under the same ownership and is also used by the RV business. • Property owners were in the process of securing entitlements to build medical buildings on the property. • Meeting held June 27, with owner and representative to review the owner's appraisal and the Commission's updated appraisal. During this meeting, the attorney asked questions about the on- and off -ramp configuration, which were answered in detail. • Since the offer was made, there have been 4 meetings and 48 phone calls and or emails to the owner's attorney. Negotiations are ongoing. 17 'Y,\` 1\-\\%4f N D NEWMEYER D1L.LAON LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LILY N. TOUBI Lily.Toubi@ndlf.com July 8, 2013 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY AND FACSIMILE Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 Fax: (951) 787-7920 File No.: 2601.101 --C)[-E© ("VW lE RIVERSIDE COUNFY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION? Re: Notice of Objections to Adoption of Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Real Property by Eminent Domain (Assessor Parcel Nos. 102-270-010) Dear Ms. Harmon: This office represents Pete Patel dba Hotel Paseo, Simple Guest Solutions and DiVita Hotel Management (collectively, "Tenants"), tenants of the real property located at 1805 W. 6th Street, Corona, California ("Property"). We have received notice that on July 10, 2013, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") will hold a hearing to adopt a Resolution of Necessity ("Resolution"). The Resolution is to authorize the acquisition of the Property in its entirety for the purposes of the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California ("Project"). We hereby resubmit our objections on behalf of the Tenant to the notice and adoption of the Resolution. We request that this letter be included as part of the formal record on this agenda item in lieu of our personal appearance. The Tenants object to the notice and adoption of the Resolution on each of the following grounds: 1. The RCTC Failed to Make Reasonable Efforts to Acquire the Property Without the Need for Litigation. Government Code section 7267.1 requires the RCTC to make reasonable efforts to acquire real property expeditiously through negotiation, not condemnation. To date, the RCTC has failed to make reasonable efforts to negotiate with the Tenants to acquire their interest in the 895 DOVE STREET 5TH FLOOR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 T 949 854 7000 F 949 854 7099 1277 TREAT BLVD. SUITE 800 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 T 925 988 3200 F 925 988 3290 Jennifer Harmon July 8, 2013 Page 2 Property. This inflexibility with respect to the offer of compensation is akin to unreasonable pre - condemnation conduct. (Tilem v. City of Los Angeles (1983) 142 Ca1.App.3d 694, 705 [191 Ca1.Rptr. 229] [statutory directives of Government Code section 7267 et seq, provide a ready guide for determining whether a public agency has engaged in unreasonable or oppressive pre - condemnation conduct].) 2. The Project Is Not Planned or Located in a Manner That Will be Most Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury. The Project is not compatible with the greatest public good because it will negatively impact, among other things, the Tenants' use and enjoyment of the Property. There are less intrusive ways of constructing the Project. The Project, therefore, is not planned in a manner that will cause the least private injury. 3. The Public Interest and Necessity Do Not Require the Proposed Project. The proposed improvements for the Project are not necessary since the current right-of- way alignment is satisfactory to accommodate existing and future traffic needs in the area. As such, the acquisition is not for a "public" purpose. 4. The RCTC Is Incapable of Conducting a Fair, Legal, and Impartial Hearing on the Resolution. Due to its involvement in designing and ultimately constructing the Project, the RCTC has already committed itself to the Project, and the adoption of the Resolution here would be a predetermined result. As such, any hearing by the RCTC to allegedly "consider" the issues pertaining to the adoption of the Resolution would be a sham and thus, voidable by the court. Based upon the foregoing, the Tenants respectfully request that the RCTC refuse to adopt the Resolution. Nothing in this letter should be construed as a waiver of any of the Tenants' rights for purposes of objecting to the Resolution. Such rights are expressly reserved. If you have any questions or comments concerning the matter 0.; ressed in this letter, please contact me directly. Very t �o Lily N. Toubi LNT:ser 3803350.1 l THOMAS J. BORCHARD* MAUREEN E. CALLAHAN JANELLE M.DEASE J.. SEAN DUMM** ST'ACEY STONE * Also licensed to practice in Michigan **Also licensed to practice in Missouri and Kansas Senders Email GVSpencer@Borchardlaw.com BORCHARD & CALLAHAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 25909 Pala, Suite 300 Mission Viejo, California 92691 Telephone: (949) 457-9505 Facsimile: (949) 457-1666 Website: www.Borchardlaw.com May 30, 2013 Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 Michigan Office 2604 West Genesee Saginaw, Michigan 48602 Of Counsel GARY V. SPENCER RE: Hearing Date/Time: July 10, 2013 at 9:30 am Location: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon St. Riverside, CA 92501 My Clients: Gary S. Elster and Pamela C. Elster, Trustees,/Property Owners REPLY TO NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS -Dear Ms. Harmon: Please be advised this office represents the interests of Trustees/Property Owners Gary S. Elster and Pamela C. Elster. Pursuant to California CCP 1245235(b)(3), my clients hereby preserve their right to appear and be heard and furthermore respond to the Notice Of Hearing to Property Owners (copy enclosed) dated May 24, 2013 ("the Notice") as follows: The Notice states in pertinent part as follows: "A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and to be heard on the following matters: 4. Whether the offer required by 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made." While the Riverside County Transportation Commission (herein "RCTC") consultants have advised that they are working on a new appraisal, the only offer that has been made, as of this date, BORCHARD & CALLAHAN Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission May 30, 2013 Page 2 was by letter dated August 10, 2011 based on an appraisal valuation of May 15, 2011. That valuation is now over two years old and in a time of rising prices and falling capitalization rates for single tenant fast food restaurants, is obsolete. Therefore, in effect, no just compensation offer has beenmade to the property owners as required by Government Code section 7267.2. The subject property has been leased to a tenant for over twenty years and during that time the property- owners' tenant has developed a thriving Del Faro business employing over 20 employees, many of which have been long time employees. The business produces substantial revenue and has a substantial customer base of local repeat business. To date, no comparable relocation property in the geographic area permitted by the tenant's franchisor has been located by RCTC's consultants, aside from the property owned by RCTC to be discussed below. As a result it appears that this thriving business will be forced to close and its employees terminated because of the proposed eminent domain proceedings. In fact, in pre condemnation action, RCTC has acquired a parcel for the widening project, the remnant of which has been discussed with property owners as a possible replacement for the property to be taken. However, to date, no appraisal of the remnant has been provided to the property owners nor have any negotiations taken place in furtherance of property owners acquiring this replacement property despite multiple requests by property owners over the last year for such negotiations to commence. While at this late date acquiring the remnant parcel and developing it into a replacement Del Taco restaurant can no longer occur, until at best, perhaps a couple of years after the taking, if RCTC proceeded expeditiously in negotiations for the sale of the remnant to property owners, it could result in the eventual resuscitation of a business that now appears to be doomed by the condemnation. This action would not only aid property owners' tenant but would also benefit the City of Corona by providing a new business and its resulting tax base. Respectfully Submitted, BORCHARD & CALLAHAN, APC /s/ Gary V. Spencer Gary V. Spencer, Esq. GVS:rsm cc: Clients 3 1 2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE C.C.P. § 1013(a) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is BORCHARD & CALLAHAN, a Professional Corporation, 25909 Pala, Suite 300, Mission Viejo, California 92691. On May 30, 2013, I served the foregoing documents described as follows: MAY 30, 2013 LETTER TO JENNIFER HARMON - CLERK OF THE BOARD - RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RE: REPLY TO NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST ( X ) BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Mission Viejo, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. ( X ) BY CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUEST MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Mission Viejo, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. *As indicated on service list. ( ) BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: In addition to the above service by mail I caused said document(s) to be transmitted by electronic service on May 30, 2013 to the electronic notification address(es) indicated above. ( X ) STATE: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on May 30, 2013, at Mission Viejo, California. Declarant 3 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SERVICE LIST Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 Via US Mail and Certified Return Receipt Requested INDIAN WELLS (760) 568-261 1 IRVINE (949) 263-2600 L.OS ANGELES (21 3) 61 7-8100 ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, P.O. BOX 1028, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 PHONE: (95 1) 686-1 450 I FAX: (95 1) 686-3083 I WWW.BBKLAW.COM MARGARET L. BARNES (95 I ) 826-8357 MARGARET. BARN ES@B B KLAW. COM May 29, 2013 Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, ri Floor Riverside, California 92501 SACRAMENTO (916) 325-4000 SAN DIEGO (619) 525-1300 WALNUT CREEK (925) 977-3300 WASHINGTON, DC (202) 7850600 VIA HAND DELIVERY DECE_ViE MAY 29 2013 Re: Original Notice of Hearing to Property Owners of RIVERSIDE COUNTY Resolution of Necessity Hearing Scheduled for July 10, 2013 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RCTC/SR91 Corridor Improvements Project Property Ownership: United Rentals Northwest, Inc., APN 102-040-015 (CPN 22141) Property Ownership: HAGF Enterprises, L.P., APN 117-070-029 (CPN 22249) Property Ownership: Pranav Y. Desai, APN 117-270-001 (CPN 22274) Property Ownership: David W. Jameson, Co -Trustee; Jennifer J. Moffitt, Co -Trustee; and William Jameson Mellor, Trustee, APNS 117-111-001 and 117-111-002 (CPN 22261) Property Ownership: BBE&W Standard Common Direct; Charles R. Webb; Rosina G. Webb; B.B.E.&W. Standard Common Direction Service Company, LLC, APN 102-102-020 (CPN 22138) Property Ownership: Gary S. Elster, Trustee and Pamela C. Elster, Trustee, APN 102-092-001 (CPN 22132) Property Ownership: M. Hebbard MacArthur, Trustee; Shirley M. MacArthur, Trustee; Christopher H. MacArthur, APNS 117-270-009 and 117-270-018 (CPN 22295) Property Ownership: Maude -Corona LLC; Maude Corona/Corona Automotive Co., APNS 118-250-027 and 118-250-028 (CPN 22199) Dear Jennifer: Attached are the original Notices of Hearing to Property Owners, with proofs of mailing, of the hearing on the Resolutions of Necessity scheduled for July 10, 2013. The original Notices were mailed on May 24, 2013. It will be necessary for you to note the proofs of mailing of the Notices at the hearing. 17336.02100\7987113.1 BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission RE: RCTC/SR91 C1P, RON Hearing of July 10, 2013 May 29, 2013 Page 2 The remaining documents needed for the hearing (Resolutions of Necessity, Agenda Report, Memorandum from Legal Counsel) will be provided in draft form to Gina Gallagher for her review and revision. She will provide the finalized versions to your prior to the hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, Margaret L. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachment copy: Gina Gallagher, Senior Right of Way Agent (w/copy of Attachments, via e-mail only) 17336.02100\7987113.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7983455.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 24, 2013. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: an-) Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7983455.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of one year, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7983441.1 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22199-1 Fee Acquisition APN's 118-250-027 & 028 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the lands described in the Deeds recorded May 9, 2001 as Document No. 2001-201209 and September 30, 2003 as Document No. 2003-765688, both of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2001- 201209; thence North 81 °54'27" West 231.37 feet along the general southerly line of said land to a point; thence North 79°02'29" West 224.20 feet continuing along said line to the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 11 °20'58" East 54.21 feet along the westerly line of said land to the southwesterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688; thence North 11 °20'58" East 31.41 feet along the westerly line of last said land to a point, said point being South 11 °20' 5 8" West 9.23 feet from the northwesterly corner thereof, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 589.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 09°47'27" East; thence easterly along said curve 112.72 feet through a central angle of 10°57'54" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 633.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 114.86 feet through a central angle of 10°23'48" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave southerly having a radius of 5523.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve 225.43 feet through a central angle of 02°20'19" to a point on the easterly line of the land described in said Document No. 2001-201209; thence South 08°03'54" West 54.21 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 31,462 square feet. PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22199_118-250-028_118-260-016\Legals\22199-1_Fee.doe 8/17/2012 Page 1 of 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 MSS See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of: Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 5.17 /2 Date PA2PTG0105011SUR VEYILEGALS122199_118-250-028_118-260-016\Legals\22199-1 _Fee.doc 8/17/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-1 FEE MAUDE-CORONA LLC 31462 SOFT. 118-250-027 & 028 N41 ' 29'012"E - °S81 ' 58'26"E 372.59` ---''') 30420' S`f Ri ht-of-Wa ° �� y' g S72 14 50 E�- �. N12°49'5?9"E` Line of Pomona Street 24.07' C 42.iO4' .._N7r16'42"W(R) S07"46'08"W(R)/ ;, C4 CURVE DATAvr co N78"45'14"r(R) € a RADIUS DELTA LENGTH a I 3; C1 589.00' 10°57'54" .112.72' I C2 633.00' 10°23'48" 114.86' Q `\' � ` n C3 5523.00' 02°20'19" 225.43' `r' ! , .. i ,�," I C4 1' 775.00' 01 ° 28'33" 45.72' a O O�„ � N C5 65.00' 09°59'02" 11.33' °o o w w Lc DOC. NO. ! N2001 -201 209 O.R. ° 1` ., - POi , OF PARCEL 3 m z' Lc) a o (\j o1 R,S� 46/31 ‘1- ril _ limn i, 1 1 • N09"47'27"E(R) ;-- Of f� N1241'J3„(R) C1 -„c)4: i..:C =� ;�' 2 _ C / - J ���'�.,. -� - _. C -� t� 6 PROPOSED R 5q ' \-____.. N79°02'29"W — N8�1°54'27"W — EXISTING RAW 224.20' 231 .37' POB SEE SHEET 2 DETAIL "A" ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 9 290 1 2 3 4 295 6 LEGEND POB Indicates Point of Beginning ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C/L STATIONING ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground i 2 2 1 9 9- 1 FEE ACQUISITION i �� distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutten Centre Drive, Ste. 200 92707 s.:ntk Anc, ;acoat-.r 154 xt l71ae+-acs3;(7i4isas-aaa3 !`o DATE: 10-24-11 REV.:08-17-12 EA:OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 5.6 1 2 EXHIBIT A2 C PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 221 99-1 FEE MAUDE-CORONA LLC 31462 SOFT. 118-250-027 & 028 DOC . NO. 2001 -201 209 O.R. PAi2CirL 3 11 18-250-028 R S, 6/31 N58° 30'06"W 34.65' 11_ I I I L_ 1 1 1...1.....1 I, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N09^47'27"E R DETAIL "A Scale: 1"=20' 7r a 1 1 aro r� as (1)T LLi o a t1, N79°02'29"W LEGEND POB indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing Title to State 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited 224.20' --- NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22199-1 FEE ACQUISITION immommmom, FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S Sutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Soma Ano, California 92707 (714)481-8053/(714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 5.6 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT 931' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22199-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN's 118-250-027 & 028 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the lands described in the Deeds recorded May 9, 2001 as Document No. 2001-201209 and September 30, 2003 as Document No. 2003-765688, both of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2001- 201209; thence North 08°03'54" East 54.21 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 5523.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 12°41'53" East; thence westerly along said curve 225.43 feet through a central angle of 02°20'19" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave northerly having a radius of 633.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 114.86 feet through a central angle of 10°23'48" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave southerly having a radius of 589.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve 112.72 feet through a central angle of 10°57'54" to a point on the westerly line of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688, said point being North 11 °20'58" East 85.62 feet from the southwesterly corner of said land described in said Docurnent No. 2001-201209; thence North 11°20'58" East 9.00 feet along said westerly line to a, point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 597.86 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 09°48'53" East; thence easterly along said curve 106.82 feet through a central angle of 10°14'13"; thence South 72°32'48" East 117.65 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 5529.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 10° 19'37" East; thence easterly along said curve 228.31 feet through a central angle of P:\2PTG010501 \.SURVEY\LEGALS\22199_ 1 18-250-028_118-260-016kLegalsl22199-2_PE.doc 8/17/2012 Page 1 of 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I 12 13 14 1.5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 02°21'57" to a point on said easterly line; thence South 08°03'54" West 6.02 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 3,425 square feet. See Exhibit `B2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of: Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date -17- PA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122199a18-250-028_118-260-0161Legals122199-2_PE.doc 8/17/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-2 ESMT MAUDE-CORONA LLC 3425 SOFT. 118-250-027 & 028 30.0-110bMix— N41 N41 29'0112"E -- S81 58'26"E 372.59' �. 30.20' S'ly Right—of—Wo, S72°14'50"E I N12°49'�9"E - Line of Pomona Street 24.07` C7 42.04' N77°16'42"W(R) '� S07°46`08"W(R) ,,,, C 6 co CURVE DATA • 0 N78°45'14*(R) # RADIUS DELTA LENGTH NI C1 5523.00' 02°20'19" 225.43' - C2 633.00' 10°23'48" 114.86' r C3 589.00' 1 0° 57'54" 1 1 2.72' `N) ` O I M C4 597.86' 10°14'13" 106.82' cp f-.; ) 4Cco N C5 5529.00' 02° 21 '57" 228.31 ' d I C6 1 775.00' 01 °28'33" 45.72' Ln � C7 65.00' 09° 59'02" 1 1 .33' to o N DOC. NO. 2001 -201 209 O.R. o POR, PARCEL PAE� 3 l 1) l 1 l �� zR,S, 461.31 N10°19'37"E(R) cv co ° N20 03 06�r E(R) /,jr Q ., M 1 _ C4 ° i N12°'41'34"E(R) — — S 72 ,` J/ rl.I 7 . ---._ _\ 32 48 E / — — — 1 PROPOSED � �sl'F ' 1 1 7. 6 5 , 0`"---- _ C 5 I R !W I `✓ 2 �- C 1 / allr i` TPOB �I N1 2°41 '53"E(R. �.... _ 54.21' EXISTING Rai 1 ` " N79°02'29"W - �� - N81°54'27" 224.20' 231.37' POB SEE SHEET 21 1 DETAIL "A" ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWA Y 1 1 I i 1 1 1 i i 1 1 9 290 1 2 3 4 295 6 LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C/L STATIONING C. ) Title to State 1 1 1 l Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 g 9- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I immmommi FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: S M A S 3 Hu't�n Carare ClrivvSta, i00 }71nr41421-E�053l714)545AE8E3 (Fax) DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8. RIV 91 5.6 1 2 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-2 ESMT. MAUDE-CORONA LLC 3425 SOFT, 118-250-027 & 028 DOC. NO. 2001 -201 209 O.R. r Am �iv! ,�RGr b/�1 118-250-0281 M s --.� N58° 301061V = 34.65 C4 _Li 1 I L...1 I I 1_.I.._I I I L. N09°47'27"E(R) Lo o <2 DOC. NO. N09°52'5011E ' 2003- 765688 1 8.22 ( O.R. Lrl Na334.0 -c 0 ..0 11 DETAIL "A" 0 0 SCa I e o 1"=20' ,I T _) , w 41 CD pp Et'' P.: � T 0 EIS N o z N79°02'29"W 224.20' - LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 1 1 l I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain groundpasionommeismati 2 2 1 9 9- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: S O M A S :i Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo Ana, Col ifornia 92707 (7141481-8053/(714)S45-8883 (Fax) DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 5.6 2 2 PS OMAS EXHIBIT C1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22199-3 Temporary Construction Easement APN's 118-250-027 & 028 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the lands described in the Deeds recorded May 9, 2001 as Document No. 2001-201209 and September 30, 2003 as Document No. 2003-765688, both of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2001- 201209; thence North 08°03'54" East 60.23 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 5529.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 12°41'34" East; thence westerly along said curve 228.31 feet through a central angle of 02°21'57"; thence North 72°32'48" West 117.65 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 597.86 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 20°03'06" East; thence westerly along said curve 106.82 feet through a central angle of 10°14'13" to a point on the westerly line of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688, said point being North 11°20'58" East 94.62 feet from the southwesterly corner of said land described in said Document No. 2001-201209; thence North 11°20'58" East 0.23 feet along said westerly line to the northwesterly corner of the land described in said Document No. 2003-765688; thence North 11 °20'58" East 1.77 feet along the westerly line of the land described in said Document No. 2001-201209 to a point thereon, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 599.86 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 09°49'11" East; thence easterly along said curve 107.15 feet through a central angle of 10°14'03"; thence South 72°32'53" East 117.41 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent P A2PTG010501 \SURV EY\LEGALS\22199_118-250-028_ 118-260-016\Legals\22199-3_TCE.doc 8/17/2012 Page 1 of 2 curve concave southerly having a radius of 5531.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 10°19'42" Fast; thence easterly along said curve 228.11 feet through a central angle of 02°21'47" to a point on said easterly line; thence South 08°03'54" West 2.01 feet along said easterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 905 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion. is 099997476. Prepared under the direction of: Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date -%7 /2 P:12PTG0105011SURVEYCLEGALS122199_118-250-028_118-260-016\Legals122199-3 JCE.doe 8/17/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-3 TCE MAUDE-CORONA I...LC 905 SOFT. .118-250-027 & 028 N41 °29' 2"E S81 °58'26"C 3 72.59' \`\ 30.20' Sly Right-of-Way� S72° 14'50" ;! I \ E I N12°49' 9"E Line of Pomona Street 24.07' C6 42.04' N77° 16'42"W(R) S07° 46'08"W(R) ;,,_) C5 �. CURVE DATA co ° N78° 45'14"IW(R) # RADIUS DELTA LENGTH 00 f, C1 5529.00' 02°21'57" 228.31' C2 597.86' 10° 14' 13" 106.82' Lo N. C 3 599.86' 10° 1 4'03" 1 07.1 5' ;1 - — ...._._..._-- .._.... - --- 1 r, C4 5531.00' 02°21'47" 228..11' o �r n �' C5 1 775.00' 01 °28'33" 45,72' o I ' (� ' C6 65.00' 09° 59'02" 11 .33' `n c " In C.) DOC. NO. 2001 -201 209 O.R.o ° P OR Jr PARCEL3 III I II ) l z R.,S 46./31 N10° 19'42"E(R) in co O N c0 N20° 03'14"E(R) /- l- ro �� - ( C3 S72o '�_ L N12° 41'28"E(R) ��� /�.�� 1132'S3"7 �, f PROPOSED 417E �C2-- C4 48,wC1- A L11703,, 2 .01' R/W _ 1 TPOB __ 0 _1_--�. /---3'U6"E(R) N12° 41'34"E(R) 60.23' .. — N79o02'29"W -- N810~54 27 UV -' EXISTING R/IN 224.20' 231.37' POB SEE SHEET 2 "A" N10° 19'37"E(R) DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 1 1 1 1 1 t _ 1 1 9 290 1 2 3 4 295 6 LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C/L STATIONING ( )Title to State 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 9 9- 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT i illiiimill distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hui -ion Centre Drive, Ste. 200 - S°'R e1-80531(�14)54596es3 (Fax) DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FA*: DISTRICT - COUNTY ROUTE - SHEET PM - SHEET NO. - TOTAL SHEETS - - 8 RIV 91 5.6 1 - 2 - EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22199-3 TCE MAUDE-CORONA LLC 905 SOFT. 118-250-027 & 028 N09° 49111"E(R) Ali _e / moo M / rn N58° 30'06"W '-__ ( 3 4.6 5 ' 1 .77'—......_� t / C3 — ,; N09° 48'53"E(R)/'` � C2 _-- p, i t L....I I I L. i I I I I J I i 1 I 1 I._..l I _..l L._l _L_.L f I I I LII .1...I_LI_.1.11.1,�s1_ L L_L. co co o o DOC . NO. N09° 52'50"E ,- 2003- 765688 '">- 1 8.22' O.R. co . 83 34. h3' DOC. N0. 2001 -201 209 O.R. w PORT 101\1 05 PARCEL 3 DETAIL "A"Q o co R..S, 4L/3I Scale: 1"=20' N� in _I , o cp to a c) r _ i 18-250--028 I __________ --- N�9°02"29"W 224.20'.— LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I i I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 9 9- 3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. T — FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. (7200 pnq. Ca i!brnio 92707 14i 2G tai4Et-53%(7i?154-??�63 (Faxl DATE: 10-24-11 REV.: 08-17-12 EA:OF540 FAit: DISTRICT - COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 5.6 2 2 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-250-027 and 118-250-028 (CPN 22199): Maude -Corona LLC c/o Leslie M. Maude 18362 Hillcrest Avenue Villa Park, CA 92861 Maude -Corona, LLC c/o John D. McGuire, Esq. McGuire & Walker 1820 East 17th Street P. O. Box 10237 Santa Ana, CA 92711-0237 Maude Corona/Corona Automotive Co. c/o Leslie M. Maude 1080 Pomona Road Corona, CA 92882 John C. Murphy, Esq. Murphy & Evertz 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 500 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 DATED: May 24, 2013. Record Owner Record Owner Record Owner Courtesy Copy .r r Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7983455.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in a portion of certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7966699.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 24, 2013. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST, By: Mar lk A. aster Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission KRIEGE*LP 17336.02100\7966699.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary Construction Easement" or "TCE" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors, and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities related SR91 Corridor Improvement Project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the non- exclusive easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights described herein. The property affected is described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. Such right shall be exercised for a period of one year, beginning no fewer than 30 days after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. 17336.02100\7980019.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 EXHIBIT "AV 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION rro, 2 4 Caltrans Pared 41-1 3 Fee € cquisition: 6 APN 102 0-41` 7 8 In the City of Corot County o Nide Smote lif nia,' being a port can of Parcel 2 as shown mthe. Parcel Map filed In Book 4, Page 91 of Pal flap , its the Office & the County Recorder of said County, described as follows 12. 13 14 1s. 16 17' 18 19, 20 21. 22 ` 23 24 25 2s. 27 28 29 30 31 Beginning y ewerof said- are 2; t "E 35.27 feet Edon the westerly Tina &said Parcel 2; ,thence leasnrk 'd. ster y line South 88 34'02" East 52.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having radius (0879.00 feet; thaice early 164.16 feet alb. said cx angle of 02°25° " to the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; thence' ouch 42 ° ' 55" Weat.11 %t along said southeasterly line tO thesout of said P11=1 ; os- Silt& 8r '44.* West 21 11 ll4 feet alongthe southerlylip f said Parcel to the Point of Beginning.. Centaini 4I73 squ & : See Exhibit at hed hereto: ci made apart hereof.. This conveyance is rye for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby release and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all butter's rim or access, appurtenant to Grantor's g property, hi awl to said freeway. �=n Pose:;I 442. EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and am bawd on California Coordinate 2 I System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007,00 epock Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 3 g.rid distances by the -mean combination factor of the courses being described. Therncan 4 combination factor for this conveision is 0.99997476. 5 6 7 Prepared under the direction of: 8 9 10 Cia-to.4 II Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 Date 12 13 14 15 17 13 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 29 30 31 3112/2012 M.UPTC010 01tSURVEYILEGALS\221441AIN J02-0404)15\Legals\22141-1_FEPA= No. 5282 Exp. 12/31 /13 Pagc2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-1 FEE UNITED RENTALS NW 4173 SQ.FT. 102-040-015 P,M. 1 ''r 2/96 2 102-040-026 54' R,S, 65/21 PARCEL 1 cr) i\ O Li a P.M, 4/91Li in S80°55'10"E 102-040-024 339,32, ull h W J ;:r. DOC # 2008- 0052624 0 , R .' 4 r. "T (w°� 102-040-015 h� �R/S.I o• • u ' P.M., ';'/ 91 doh) zN PARCEL 2 (1,45-p`1, 102-270-001 -` _ PROPOSED R/W __.__ III W II 8.�84 "- EXISTING R/W 21 582° 57' q 4' W 1 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 2.214- ROUTE C/L STATIONING 1 SEE SHEET 2 9 220, 8 FREEWAY 215 6 SIDE ROUTE 91 RIVER \j\.\ LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 1 4 1- 1 FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo 2707 (710751n7373/(714)545California98883 (Fax) DATE:12-13-11 REV.:2; 3-12-2012 EA:OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 4.2 1 2 EAF1161 If A, PALM 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-1 FEE UNITED RENTALS NW 4173 SQ.FT. 102-040-015 N- N M >J„IYJ, 4/9J tx Lu `n N Cr s N co 0 m P, zPo0 co �co co N 5000 59 311E (R) - I � � I 102-040-015 0=02° 25'29" R=3879.00' L=164.1 S82° 57'44 W POB 2: 41 6 218.8 ROUTE 91 ROUTE 91 IVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited 7 102-270-001 S42° 53'55"W 8.22' RIVERSIDE FREEWAY 8 9 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22141-1 FEE ACQUISITION 1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: P SOMA S 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE:12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA.OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUT E SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 eA RIV 91 N161T f PA(sE 5 4.2 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 EXHIBIT 'RI' 'LEGAL DESCRIPTION Cali -vans Pat -eel No. 22141-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement. 6 ,i0t.PN 102440-015 7 s In Cit"' of Comm °tail* of tiverside„ State of ettlifOrnia, being aportion 9 Parcel 2,' shorn shown ml the ParCel MN) filed in 13ook 4, Page 91 of Parcel Maps„, in the 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Commeneing at the most souther comer of said Parcel 2; thence North 09'26'44" East 5Z feet along the westerly lined said Parcel 2 to the True Point of Begiurdng; thence outh 88°34'02East 52.88 *a to tho beginnirtg of a Calve concave tairtherly batting a radius of 3879.00 feet; thence easterly 164.16 feet along said curve through a central angle of 02°25'29" to the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; thence North 42°53'55" East 11,11 feet along said southeasterly line to the beginning of'a non. tangent curve concave northerly having a mdins of 3871.00 feet, tt radial line to said be,girinirig bears South;01°06"21" East; thence westerly 171,51 feet along said curve through a central angle of 02°32'19"; thence North 88°34'02" West 51.76 feet to the westerly line of said Parcel 2; thence South 09'26'44" West 8.08 feet along said westerly line to the Tine Point of Beginning, 24 Containing 1761 square feet. 25 26 See Exhibit '132' attached he and made a part hereof, 27 2S The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2ocri.ao epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being descnibed. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0,99997476, 3/1.1/2012 MA2PTGOI 0501\5 uRVEYNI.MALS22141 JUIN J02.040-0151Lesals 1414 AMU Esur.soe P.44,01 cif EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 5 10 13' 14 1 16 17 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2s 29 30 under the direction of �y L. Eve, FLS 5282 3/1212012 Al S12214 APIQ 02- 01 Late 141-2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-2 ESMT UNITED RENTALS NW 1761 SO.FT. 102-040-015 P .A ., J -12/96-98 102-040-026 54' R ,,S ., 65/@ 1 . PARCEL 1 I-- o 1-u tr W po I\ 102-040-024 55'10"w 339.32' �h W v r7 ODD # 700a- 00576 34 O ., R ., ^-) v Ln Q coin ni 102-040-015 -<<' R ., S a') Lri `� P .,M . 4/91 <0h %ham' . oNPARCEL ri.. tC) tr' 2 102-270-001 _ — =-- _—' PROPOSED R/W �� _ ._ - — "" , .. III a,84' ,„, '— EXISTING R /W 582057'44 W 91 RI VERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE - C/L STATIONING A SEE SHEET 2 9 220 e 215 6 7 FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE LEGENDL)11\\\\\\ POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( )Title to State III l I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 1 4 1- 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Santo Ano, Californiae200 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA 0F540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4. 2 1 2 xMI81T A� EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-2 ESMT UNITED RENTALS NW 1761 SOFT. 102-040-015 I sr. '; PAT, 4/91 N ' o rn 1 O O NPARCEL 2 OP m• � r'tn N o 102-040-015 / // � N , v N DOC # 20 9-- 0052624 O . R � (e) , v �h �' ; N c el, �. P . 4) o O (n O M °� <0 S01 °06'21 "E (R) h^;4' ° 1 102-270-001 _ N88° 34; 02"W -1. ice- 0=02° 32' 1 9" Kati R = 3 8 71 .00 L, =1 .51— — --. --_`= "� ,; / _ 52°3.88'' S88402'E S82° TPOB POC R=387o.00' 2 L=164.16'mm'� 0=02 25 29 57 ' 4 4"W 218.8 S00° 59 31'` (Ril 1 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING 9 8 6 � LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 PERMANENT WALL 1 4 FOOTING 1- 2 EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)545-6663 (Fax) DATE:12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4.2 2 2 CXF1161T A, PA (t t 'J 17 is t 20 21 22 21 24 2S` ?6 27 s 2 30 3_L EXHIBIT' C It1 ans Parcel No. ;, 1-3 5 Temporary Construction Ease 7 ha the City of Corona, County of Riverside State of aI `onna„ being a portion of Parcel 2 as shorn on the ,Parcel Map filed in Book 4, Page 91 of Parcel Maps, in this'. Office ofthe County Recorder of said County, describe; as follows. Int t the m s j ;rimer of said Parcel ,thence North 0992644u East 4335feet.along the why l 14 cantMuing North 09°2 44East 3ong; westerly tine; thence leaving said me South 88°34' East 51 <33 feet to the beginning of a curve concave ly:having>a radius of 3 6s.il feet; :thence ;easterly 174.29 feet alongsaid:curve x a central: $ te of { ° 4' 54„: to the: southeasterly litre of said Parcel ; thence 42°5315r West 417 feet along said southeasterly line to the beginning ()fa Win:- alit c>ir re concave northerly having a radius of 3871 a jai line tossid: ginning bears South. Ol6121." ; thence westelly 171. 1. feet along said curve ugh a Central angle of02°32'19"; thence North 88°34'02*'West 51.76 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 673 swore feet. aid Marcel 2 to the True Point of " ' in 8e Exhibit `C2' shed hereto and.made a part hereof. The distances described ham, are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground disttmees.may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses big described. the mean enmbina.tan factor for this emersion is 0.99997476.. 3/1212 012 lVMPTG0105011SURV YNLEi314 APN_1112 I-3 TCILdtc EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 is t 20 21 2 23 24 2s 6 7 2s 29 30 31 Pre red 1:itider the. dire Lion of: r my L. vans, PL5 5282 Bate' 3 12/2t7 :k2PT 22141-33tE.doc Page EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-3 TCE UNITED RENTALS NW 673 SOFT. 102-040-015 P„M, 1 '1 / 6-99 102-040-026 54' R , S ., 65/21 PARCEL 1 rn I, o W L.r> t-LJ I\ S80o'S5 102-040-024 E 339.32, �h 1U w 0?) • CI, v DOD # 2009- 0052624 D ., R „ � Q v cot. ` c�roo 102-040-015 $ R , '' 4 ,<h 62/'f,;' o11.0: P,M� ';'J91 cb 43 . o Lc,oh ZN PARCr L 2 L�QprL 102-270-001 6 PROPOSED R/W ----, 218.g4 EXISTING R /W 5820 5744 W t 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE :1 �11 �3 CAL STATIONING 1 SEE SHEET 2 e 220 215 6 e SIDE FREEWAY ROUTE TE 9� RIVER LEGEND fil1\ POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I I I 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 1 4 1- 3 EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 r- FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa (714)751n 7373/(714)545-8 83 (fax) DATE:12-13-11 REV.:2; 3-12-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4. 2 1 2 GE 1Z EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22141-3 TCE UNITED RENTALS NW 673 SOFT. 102-040-015 Cr o rn 'a rn` ,� M „ PARCEL 2 co o iri // w (Nitn 102-040-015 v-h Nv-A • rJ' DC #2DDi3- 0052br�'r 0 ., i� , " o5• N , „�� ° �� r� �,�„ i -' 9l. o v ,� z S01 °08'56"E (R) �hh n 588° 34'02"E 1 102-270-001 51 .33�/ -iiiiii— P�h 0=02° 34'54" ®=...�.8�...Q.O' L_=1 74.29' I -- _. — _ — 51.7. , __-_ R=3871 00• L=171 , _..... ®i 111, N88. 34'02"W S82 TPOB POC ____------ �=02.32' 1 9" ter_ � 4.1 7' 1 8•a4� ( 218.8 ° 57, 44„W S )1 ° 06,21,E r;R)( ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE .FREEWAY ROUTEs 91 RIVNGSIDE FREEWAY C/L TATIONI 8 6 g LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State J I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 1 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 4 1- 3 EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo 2707 (714)751n73734714)545California98883 (Fax) DATE:12-13-11 REV.: 2; 3-12-2012 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 4.2 2 2 t 7 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-040-015 (CPN 22141): United Rentals Northwest, Inc. 13455 Noel Road, #1900 Dallas, TX 75240 Dennis Fevergeon United Rentals Northwest, Inc P. O Box 367 Buena Park, CA 90621 DATED: May 24, 2013. Record Owner Courtesy Copy Margaret 14e Barnes j 17336.02100\7966699.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF CONTINUED HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, .is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of r the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7980606.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 24, 2013. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BES _ & KRIEGER L By: M. A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7980606.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC, absolute ownership of the property. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement" grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, together with all necessary and convenient means of ingress and egress to and from the easement area or strip or parcel of land, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7935050.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CaBrans Parcel No. 22249-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 3.98 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 32.84 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°4619". West 33.25 feet along said southerly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 65 square feet. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. See Exhibit `AV attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PMPTG0105011.SURVEMEGAL3\22249 APN_117-070.02911.4pis122249-1-Fee.doc 7/122012 Pale I of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 P S 0 MAs 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 li/ 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 7/?- Date P:12t'TG0105011SURVEYILEGALS122249_APN_ 1 I 7-070-029►Lcgatst22249-1-Fee.doc 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-1 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 65 SO.FT. 117-070-029 t 1 l 7-070-027 c� r ti O , o i ` i I I I 123� 27 , 50' i I W i Lu � . ,�0 117-070.0281 v j W Q, orn � 0._ 0 ? � � , r� ArkCPS`- 586°42'10"£ 281.76' I PARCEL "A" 1 I DOC.n2006- I 0149096 O.R. ri r 3tv. i N({G z ._., i Z I 4 "' M r j Qo �c,c 0 z ? 22.249: �_ ___ ___ .4 284�40 5880 46 39 W f ----- '"�''''''-.... SEE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to Stote Access Prohibited .1JL1.L1 NOTES 22249-1 Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stotioning are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. i---- FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 F!ui ton Centre De1„e Sfe. ZOO Senro And, Cd fdrn,0 12107 (714 751 7713.(71.'545-BM frog - DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: 0E540 FA::: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET Pk4 SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 t R 1 V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-1 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 65 SQ.FT. 117-070-029 ._1 Tr w r ti a !Ai? 4 O O O PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. ? ,�, �O S84°20'56"E 32.:4' 1 'LS- L Lek 3 r i 1 FREEWAY o O O • 2.... •- ,- o M P08 _. 33.25, S88°46'3i 28 4.40, RIVERSIDE 2,22497'1) ROUTE 91 LEGEND POB Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ) 1.1-1.1.1 NOTES 22249-1 FEE ACOUISITION Coordinates and bearings are on CC5 1981(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherw;se noted. i #omm"momq FEET 0 5 10 20 30 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Ay} tor Canoe Ori.a Sl.. 200 5an4o me [a1iforni0 42202 7$4,751• L03/014)545' 0713 (ra+i DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAe: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 Fi v 9 1 6. 4 2 2.. EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `Bl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22249-2 Fee A,couisitioq APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006.0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 13.93 feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 53°0T31" East 16.51 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 46.41 feet to a point on the easterly line of said land; thence South 08°03'13" West 55.78 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beghuting. Containing 125 square feet. See Exhibit 132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG010501\SURV'EYV.EGALSS 22249_APN_117-070-0291esal022249-2-Fce.doc 7/12r2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 PSOMAS Prepared under the direction of 3 4 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 i I 7 /2• /2 Date PA2PTG0105011SURVEY\Ll GALS\22249_APN I17-070-0291Legais122249-2-Fee.doc 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-2 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 125 SOFT. 117-070-029 ` I ] ] 7-070-027 �� c� I .0 r- o 0 o I r 1� 1 I� Ih��' I I 96 I I �3� 1 I 50' t ' 1 i w w� i I ,` -�U r 117-070-028 i in I !AtDOC.#2006- Q, ?' 0'� �,�;0f., L i "I- / S86°42'10"E 281.76' r !' PARCEL "A" / , ! ! 0149096 O.R. ! J t Z 1 \ '-. \ Q I . I \ 1. "' I I ryl �o r 00�/ 1 o� o r_ o� z (22249-2 I `---- f ?0°-'�, 1 i / I / P08 58 46 9„W 284.40 _ SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 1 t t Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-2 Coordinates and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) tone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 pmmimmor 4Immumm■em, FEET 0 25 50 100 ISO PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 Hut ,cn rent..e Dr..e. Ste. MO Tier:si-7373 71e054S eeei Iro,l DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PIS SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-2 FEE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 125 SO.FT. 117-070-029 1 I �`ttG�L 2 117-070-028 50 I + -- S86°42'10"E 281.76' I wi I .....,.-- — .— I I PARCEL "A" I DOC.#2e706- 0149096 O.R. I 1;� 3 1u) Q 0-a' 1 1,1 fl T �, � r- -- -- -- o I I I I I— M W o C `" V1 i i M � 1 -- t i ;h � o I s in 0 i 1 22249 2 N53°0'17131 "E -.. 16A1' `- t `, V j P 13.93 sse A6' 39"'r28A .44� .....-- LEGEND ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State .L_ui...1 Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 I-ommmi p111111111.11111111011111. FEET 0 10 20 40 60 PREPARED 9Y: PSOMAS 3 Murton Centre (Mire Ste. t00 sent° AA*, Cultfarn;k, 9270' j7741751-7373/17141343-81123 Ir0.1 DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS g RIV 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `Cl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel Mk 22;19-3 Permanent Wall Footine Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 3.98 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 46.45 feet; thence South 01 °01' 15" East 4.30 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 14.45 feet along said southerly line to a point thereon; thence North 84°20'56" West 32.84 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 269 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2V70010301%URVEY‘LEGALS\22249 APN_117-070-029V.421s122249-3-PE.doc 7/12/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 . h i� PS OMAS Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7'2- t2 Date PA2PTG010501LSURVCIA.EGAL5122249_APN 117-070-029U.egalsl22249-3-PE.doc 7 12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL* TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-3 PE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 269 SOFT. 117-070-029 .�� i 117-070-027 `� y UVOGG1� Et: 0. M a 1 1 (� ! 50' i I I I I LU w l o -ICJ 117-070-028 ( t/) I .- . W , Q_ o O: o .- co _ r ' ? AttG --. 2 S86°42'10"E 281.76" i j PARCEL "A" 1 DOC.#2006- + 0149096 O.R. 1 r , 3 i W°SAdi Z I �, I Z I I ;r,'�-' I Qo j %co j a , z 2 2'2' 5:4, 3) T P s..� _. � a 0' 2 L :. 5g8° 46 39"W 84 ' i l i t 1 1 L! `^` SEE SHEET 2 PQ8 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning P08 Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 11411 Access Prohibited NOTES 22249..3 Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. i Ian FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 40, ron Cen,r. or:.. Sea. ?OD M'IjIs�ia+1%iii:js s eaea tro.l DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF 540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-3 PE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 269 SOFT. 117-070-029 ._ ..- y --1 to -c 6.01' m _ - Pi(22249`-3) Q 0 '0 0149096 PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006— O.R. ? j 0' �� 46�45' --- �!' 84 2.J / 2-3' O �`��,f�1f t ---n 501°01'15"E 4.30' � 14.45 --- O 0 N.0 0 t N. �_ S84°20'56"E -7o 0 z --� T POB N84°20'56" - 32 3.98' P06 Sag°g6'39"41 284.40' 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE LEGEND r TP08 POB True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ( ) J_LL.L.I NOTES 1 FEET 0 22249-3 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT pimmimmie-411111111111emeimmai Coordinotes and bearings ore on CCS 1993(2007.00) Zane 6. Distances and stotioning ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 30 5 10 20 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS Mutton Centre Drive Ste. 2C0 (7t4)7s('-7373/i7pisaee°si ireo DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAat: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PIS SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 PSOMAS EXHIBIT `D1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Cabrans Parcel No. 22249-4 Temporary Construction Easement APN 117-070-029 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence North 08°00'04" East 9.99 feet along the westerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning, thence North 08°00'04" East 6.01 feet continuing along said westerly line to a point thereon; thence South 84°20'56" East 45.50 feet; thence South 01°01'15" East 6.04 feet; thence North 84°20'56" West 46.45 feet to the True Point of Beginaiing. Containing 276 square feet. See Exhibit `D2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. PA2PTG010501‘SURVEYiL,ECIALS122249 APTl_117-070-029\1.4p1022249-4.TCEAke 7/12/2012 Pap 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 PSOMAS 2 i Prepared under the direction of 3 ' 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 /2. /2 Date P:12PICA 05011SURVEYILEGA1S122249 APN_117-070-0291Legals‘22249-4-TCE.doc 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-4 TCE HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 276 SO.FT. 117-070-029 117-070-027 `.1 --A, hi r ti o o O I r ? I1tc-\' I I , I 1,2 " I i ! 50 =---} i { I t � i LW i CCn. i 1 .j �� 117-070-0281 I V) i Cr,�'mom orn 0 - o .— P .° + ��t0%L I S86°42'10"E 281.76' I PARCEL „A" I. DOC.#2006— I I 0149096 O.R. _) r 3 r \�, z i ......• i i { { - I M^ rn p I n i i z TP08 2 2 219,- 4 p eft` r �, _� F „W 284.40` 1) sfle 46 39 Novi...---- 1 -- --- -- ---\ SEE SHEET 2 POB FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TPOB True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State ( ( 1) I Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-4 Coordinotes and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distonces. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoin TEMPORARY CONSTRUCriON EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I 1.. fmniemissmmig FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Mutton Centre Dr,e Si*. zoo Santo Ana, Col.to,nfa 92702 (7i4)751-7373-171A15,5-0883 (Foy) DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: 0E510 FM*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PEA SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 16 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN ` 22249-4 TCE ,HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 276 SO.FT._ 117-070-029 — .1 LLi Er:c ( rn e .9 029w4) 0 o 0 z 6.01' TPOB i -_ ..— r 0149096 PARCEL "A" DOC .#2006- O.R. 45.50' —46.45' I -3- LS 0 ? S 01 ° 01 ' 1 5 t' E 6.04' �— 0 0 0 1 N. , J2yQ 584°20'56"E N84°20'56"W ____ i 9.99' POB S88° 46' 39"W 284.40 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY ROUTE LEGEND TP08 POB True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited ( ) 1 ) (( i NOTES 22249-4 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 FEET 0 5 10 20 30 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 Mutton Centre ON.e. Ste, 200 571171415459 7707 (4)25.7323/(8443 (rem) DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FAe: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I U Al 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17 PSOMAS EXHDIIT `El' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Cgjtrans Parse! No. 22749-5 5 ' TemoorITY ConstraMi9lt EasenIerd 6 APN 117-070-029 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described as Parcel "A" in that certain Grant Deed recorded March 1, 2006 as 10 I Document No. 2006-0149096 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said land; thence South 88°46'39" West 13.93 13 feet along the southerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the True 14 Point of Beginning, thence South 88°46'39" West 14.21 feet continuing along said 15 southerly line to a point thereon; thence North 03°04'21" East 28.93 feet; thence South 16 86°28'44" East 24.04 feet; thence North 10°35'59" East 63.02 feet to a point on the 17 northerly line of said land; thence South 86°42'10" East 3.53 feet along said northerly 18 line to the northeasterly comer of said land; thence South 08°03'13" West 33.65 feet 19 along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence South 10°35'59" West 46.41 20 feet; thence South 53°0731" West 16.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 21 22 Containing 994 square feet 23 24 See Exhibit 'E2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 25 26 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 27 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 28 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 29 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 30 31 PA2PTG010301\4URVVALEGAiS122249 APN 117-070-029top102249-54CEda 7n7/2012 Pigs I of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS 0MAS Prepared under the direction of f Brun E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 7 /2- a P:12PTG0105011SURVEIYILEGAi,S‘22249_APN 117A70-0291Legals122249-5-TCE.dx 7/12/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22249-5 TCE _HAGF ENTERPRISES, L.P. 994 SOFT. 11 7-070-029 1 1 7-070-027 1 � I v to v z CL a o cl 0 1 � �+��J�\� i � � ` _____________ 14. I 1 r 3~ � 50' I I I j l � I W 1 1 1 �0 L 117-070-028 I in I _ w �, ?'�° ?OtC-`. 586°42'10"E 281.76' / • PARCEL "A„ % DOC .#2006— 1 i 0149096 O.R. I I 1 Q 1 I 1 I ;,r, I I � hoal42495 o .— z .,a �t G�", 3 � t ? iQ, vi i / 1 l POB ' � TPOB SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND TP08 True Point of Beginning POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 L1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES 22249-5 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1963(2007.001 Zone 6. Distonces and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I l i 1•111111111111111111111110, FEET 0 25 50 100 750 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 1 NNuon Centre 0,1.0r Ste. 200 (7i41 51-7373/(714)5AS469 i tao.i DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: OF540 FA*: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6.4 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20 EXHIBIT E2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA . APN 22249-5 TCE HAGF ENTERPRISES, l.P. 994 SO.FT. 117-070-029 �G�L‘� ---- S86°42'10"E PARCEL "A" DOC.#2006- 0149096 O.R. ? AZ�F�\' 3 3_ / 9. nn -fit} �� 'M see46'39"W Lo.1 11II M OJV _ � ..—�..(M j i j .� a 1 ;fM O M I : T I Q .�,41 O o 4 13.93, RIVERSIDE I 1 1 7-070-028 3.53' 'n ;-, s .� �- o Q a POB 50' W CC z <c . FREEWAY 1 Go I I 1 I I i 1 ! I I I 7.5 284•401 281.76' `. N 74 MN�. S$6°28`44"E( 24rQ4 1, 22249-5) c. 00Acl 14.23 TPOB k. 4j, \ � ____,i ROUTE 91 LEGEND TPOB True Point POB Point of of Beginning Beginning Stote Prohibited ( ) Title to 1 t i i t Access NOTES FEET 0 22249-5 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.001 Zone B. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 60 10 20 40 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS ] HgttOn Centre ()rive. Ste. ZOO Santa t- COr'r`ris 9Zi4 ► tit a 010, Coh ror is 2/07 (i 0. DATE: 07-12-12 REV.: EA: 0E540 FAe: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PIA SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS r 8 R 1 V 91 6.4 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 21 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-070-029 (CPN 22249): HAGF Enterprises, L.P. 29484 Live Oak Canyon Road Redlands, CA 92373 Mark Sabbah Sabbah and MacKoul 116 North Vineyard Avenue Ontario, CA 91764 DATED: May 24, 2013. Record Owner Courtesy Copy Margaret I`/ Barnes )&4-.A.44.„ 17336.02100\7980606.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee and temporary construction easement interests in a portion of certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7966744.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 24, 2013. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: ona Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7966744.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7984258.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 PSOMAS EXHIBIT' Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CaWens Parcel No, 22274-1 Fee acquisition APN 117-270-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in the Corporation Grant Deed recorded June 29, 2011 as.DocurriertNo. 2011-0287424 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: I3eginning at the southerly terminus of that certain course shown as "North 08'091r East, 194,03 feet" on the Record of Survey filed in Bow 64, Page 37 of Records of Survey in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, said comae having a bearing ofttiorth 08908'22" East for the purpose, of this description; thence along said course North 08°08'22" East 89.24 feet; thence South 79°28'45" East 120.46 feet to thebeginning of a curve eoneave northwesterly having a radius, of 9fU0 fe,•et. 4100 easterly and northeasterly 47.90 feet along said curve through a central angle of 70'22109" to the easterly line a the land shown:on said Record. Of Sulvey; thence along the easterly, southeasterly and southerly lines of said land the following four courses: 1. South 08°10164 West 107.22 feet to the beginning of a owe cmteave northwesterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; 2, Southwesterly and westerly 43,72 feet along said curve through a centralale of 100'1117"; North, 71'371-7" Wea 130.63 feet to the beginning of et curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 1030.00 feet; . Northwesterly 0.07 feet along said curve through a central angle of00600q5't to the Point of Beginning. Contains 15914 square feet M: \2PTG010501\SURVEMEGALS\22274_APN_I I 7-270-00 IALwis \ 22274, Ldoex Page 1 oft 3/2/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PSOMAS 2 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 3 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 4 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 5 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 6 7 See Exhibit 'Al' attached hereto and made apart hereof. 8 9 Prepared under the direction of: to it 12 CPatt.0.4 t 13 Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 Date 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 A. 4 No. 5282 Exp. 12/31 /13 M:12PTG010501 \SURVEY\LEGALS122274_APN_117-270-001 Legals\222741-1.docx Page 2 of 2 3/2/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22274-1 FEE PRANAV Y. DESAI 15914 SOFT. 117-270-001 \, I S740�\ - - 119 320 029 i 159 6g5',E �_, �, S 159 9 ,O5 w "E B cp 6 g ��NSF ov:-POR , OF LOTS 5 - 1 1 Rq�`Rag - 1 1 9-320-030 Oo AND 34 -.� / IN OLocx man p I z � 1 W PM 21'f-5'f cr , PPG.,a13 �13 � � 0 30' r SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND WATER CO , r� f� zSF M,8, ; 1 Lob (�S,S .0Qa ) t� • DOC. N0.201 1—0287424 ��� 1 POR, LOT 3 DATED: 06/29/2011 "1 JLx J3 /58:..27' R,S, .64/3l W l�llz0, �yPG�S N81 °52'12„W '30' W ( S � D Co., ) M O 117-270-002 w 117-270-005 v o POR , OF NM-, � RI ro LDTS1—)0� _---��'`� a SEE SHEET 2 °' /°coo°' d „i co'• DETAIL A / z� �. �, • POB� , / 1V711o3; � PROPOSED R/W F4,(17/ �7 �37, w F R040 - EXISTING R/W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND C/L STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing 355 356 357 359 ( ) Title to State 359 I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 4- 1 FEE ACQUISITION distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hut+on Centre Drive, Ste. 200Santa California 92707 (714)751n� 7373/(7114)545-99S3 (Fax) DATE: 3-7-12 REV.: 3-14-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS O _AI V (] 9 1 6.7 1 2 f EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22274-1 FEE PRANAV Y. DESAI 15914 SOFT. 117-270-001 POR , Or LOTS 5- J 1bs i Cr) AND 34-3 7 IN 8LUCK "an v- '°F 117-270-002W SOUTH RIVERSIDE _ LAND AND WATER CO, � � 1 P R, Dr LOTS ' I ,S, 9; PG, 6 (S„S„ Co, J I 3 -3 `v ' DOC. N0.201 1-0287424 �1`'� o DATED: o } -06/29/2011 22274`'' ° a O z co R „ S , 64/3 7 "' S59° 50'54"E (R) _ — S?g0�8 45.,E I 30 - 20,g6- N8°08'22"E 89.24' N I ' n �N � � f w x O 41 c Ce POB `a . �r �� Y DETAIL B - _ in �.! 0 _r, � — - —',�� �� max. w ,. � 0N77. ;vv- M 37 .z mN 3?„w �_ 73 m CO FR O, 63 z oNT4GF N�� ° P040 51 8°22'08"W (R)-0.07' 3, 3? ,W 00 I Q. 0 — R=1030.00' �30.6,3- ` 0=0° 00' 1 5" DETAIL"B" DETAIL I'A" NO SCALE LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State I I I I !Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 2 2 2 7 4- 1 FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 200 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS Santo tAnaon ,Centre Califorrnia 92707 200 (714)751-7373/(714)545-BBB3 (Fox) DATE: 3-7- 2 REV.: 3-14-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 6. 7 2 2 f PSOMAS EXHIBIT 131' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22274-2 5 TernDorarir ConstrUetiOn Easement. 6 APN 117-270-001 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in the Corporation Grant Deed recorded I= 29, 2011 as Doc= No. 10 2011-0287424 of Official Records of said County, described as follows! 11 12 Beginning at the southerly terminus of that certaincourse having the bearing and 13 distance of 'North 08'09'37" East, 194.03 feet" as sho' on the Record of Survey filed 14 in Book 64, Page 37 of Records of Survey in the Office of the County Recorder of said 15 County, said course having a bearing of North 08*-08122" East for the purpose of this 16 description; thence alOng said course North 08'08'22" East 89.24 feet to the True Point 17 of floghtning; thence South 79P28'45" East 120.46 feet to the betinning Of &curve 18 concave northwesterly having a radius of 39.00 feet; thence easterly and northeasterly 19 47.90 feet along said curve through a central angle of 70°22'09" to the easterly line of the 20 land shown on said Record of Survey; thence North 08°10'36" East 12.82 feet along said 21 easterly line; thence leaving said easterly line South 25°54100" West 9.28 le to the 22 beginning of a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 35.00 feet; thence 23 southerly and southwesterly 45.62 feet along said curve through &central angle Of 24 74°41'15"; thence North 79°2845" West 120.63 feet to said course having the bearing 25 and distance of "North Or09'37" East, 194.03 feet"; thence South 0897022" West 26 4.00 feet along said course to the Trite Point of Beginning, 27 28 Contains 687 square feet 29 30 31 MA2PTG0105011SURVErLEGALS\22274APN_117-270-001\Lega1s122274-2.docx Ptige 1 of 2 3/2/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described.. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. See Exhibit '132' attached hereto and made apart hereof. Prepared under the direction of: Jeremy L. Evans, PLS 5282 Date et, LAN \'1,‘( No. 5282 j;t Exp, 12/31/13 4° 14',N * IVIA2PTG010501 SURVEYTEGALS122274_APN_117-270-001 Legals122274-2.docx Page 2 of 2 3/2/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA A P N 22274-2 TCE PRANAV Y. DESAI 687 SQ.FT. 117-270-001 \, S?qo �� I 119-320-029 1 159 605'% o -------_______� S?qo �� w 150 05-',E eNS co \F POR , Or LOTS 5-II �� Rgl4RO�\, AND 3 —3V IN JLOCN "a" q0 1 1 9-320-030 0• / c PM1 ,;�,; P,M„0, 143 P--) E 1 0 130 ;y SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND WATER CO, • Ill J 8 J / y P G J 6 (S J J J Co,) DOC. NO.201 1-0287424 6 �POR, LOT 3 DATED: 06/29/2011 � ELK, /3 - .i W 1�/1, E, PC',6 N81 ° 52212„ w i� S r/ % 30' -(S 8 Co , ) r, I 1 7-270-002 :.` w o <, w Q 117-270-005 i PORE 0 O _ N LOTS 3/-39a,0 M NM M a. --- ----:o , .L� rn w—, 3 7� �f ; co_ z 4=100o2 SEE SHEET 2 POB R=25• 00'1\'4 7- . DETAIL A 11� _ -- M r_ � jib , \TPOB _� �_ SEE SHEET 2 \\�,v?/ ..,�}S 0._ � PROPOSED R /W DETAIL B EXISTING \\C\ A*:,-- 3 � �3 �„w qCF'\ Rpq0 R/W ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY LEGEND Cis STATIONING POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Beoring 355 356 357 358 ( ) Title to State 359 1 1 I 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 4 - 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (714)751n 7373/(7014)5459BBB3 (Fax) DATE: 3-7- 2 REV.: 3-14-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO.TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V r1fi nail' _AL 91 Y•..P�'• 6. 7 1 2 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22274-2 TCE PRANAV Y. DESAI 687 SOFT. 117-270-001 POR, Or LOTS 5-II I AND 34-31 IN JLOcK "a" r SOUTH RIVERSIDE �117-270-002 0 LAND AND WATER R CO, �-. .- 1, a ., ) y PG, 6 C S ., 8 ., C o ,) x f, POR, Or LOTS w DOC. NO.201 1-0287424 0o I /`39 i ;, DATED: 06/29/201 1 ,; �N m ,' R „ S , 64/3 / 0 O S25° 50'00"W K � R=35.00' 9.28' S8°08'22"W 4.00' Z 0=74°41 '1 5" N8° 1 0'36"E L=45.62' '" 0 12.82' � .N7- 28'q5 F W ; TPOB o _ 20. 63' S7 � 559°50'54"E (R) N8°08'22"E 89.24' 46' 30' � R=39.00' 3 W 0=70°22'09", r°N POB L=47.90' oN (1) bt .— r- J PROPOSED R/W s � 0 n- Q ��/� R=25.00' I a DETAIL�, B��— �� 0=100°11'47" �`' 0 L=43.72' 3� v " CON \ Oa.6 63• G4r 070 'Q�qp S18°22'08"W (R) 3737,W L=0.07' R=1030.00' 730.6,3- \ 0=0°00'1 5" DETAIL"B" DETAIL "A" NO SCALE LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 7 4- 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. I - FEET 0 25 50 100 200 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200Santo (714)751n 7California 373/(714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 3-7- 2 REV.: 3-14-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 9 1 6.7 2 2 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 117-270-001 (CPN 22274): Pranav Y. Desai 5291 East Rural Ridge Circle Anaheim, CA 92807 DATED: May 24, 2013. Record Owner Margaret I,:. a.• l 7336.02100\7966744.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7984244.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: May 24, 2013. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 11/ By:MOM. . Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7984244.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7984570.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 i PS OMAS EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22261-1 Fee Acquisition APN 117-111-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 1 in each of the deeds recorded June 22, 2000 as Document No. 2000-241350 and July 6, 2007 as Document No. 2007-0441129, of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the existing northerly right of way line of Third Street, said line lying 30.00 feet northerly of and perpendicularly distant from the original centerline thereof, with the original centerline of the north -south alley in Block 177 of the plat of "South Riverside Town Site" as said block is shown on the map filed in Book 9 of Maps, Page 8, San Bernardino County Records, said point also being the southeasterly corner of said land; thence North 81 °57'09" West 89.41 feet along a portion of the southerly line of said land to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 81°57'09" West 8.51 feet continuing along last said line to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence northwesterly along a portion of the general westerly line of said land and said curve 31.42 feet through a central angle of 90°00'21 "; thence North 08°03' 12" East 12.14 feet continuing along last said general westerly line to the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 40.00 feet; thence northeasterly along last said general westerly line and said curve 32.11 feet through a central angle of 45°59'29" to a point thereon; thence South 10°10'50" West 42.33 feet; thence South 35°48'26" East 25.80 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 653 square feet. PA2PTG010501 \SURVEY\LEGALS\22261 _APN_ 117-111-001 \Legals\22261-1 _FEE-R l .doc 5/10/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1.7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AS See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of: Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date PA2PTG010501 \SURVEYTEGAI_:S\22261_APN_117-111-001\Legals\22261-1_PEE-RLdoc 5/10/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCELit TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22261-1 FEE JAMESON / MELLOR 653 SOFT, 117-111-001 CURVE DATA RADIUS DELTA LENGTH N35°57'19"W (R) Cl 40,00' 45°59'29" 32.11' i R=40.00' I L=62.82' /,— 581 ° 57'n33"E 77.94' j A=89° 59'1 5„ 41 4.1 i Ct PROPOSED I•— R/W NO$°03'1 2"E 12.14' i . (' , o in ;F'Y'•� N `r°o cn y w.. DOC. NOS. 2000-241350 & in 2007-0441129 O.R. , N POR � Jr LOTS '' 1�y 1 �y 1 Iy 1 I BLO�'1{ 1 l:l ,M M,B, 9 i a �; � ' N 00 i r'� SAKI Br RNARD J NO 30 ,, opi yS35°48'26 E :n' I EXISTING R/W--. �25.80 .-- j R=20.00' — 89.41' ' L=31 .42' N81 ° 57'09"W " 97.92' POB i o=90° ao'21 TPOB - 8.51' I' j THIRD i v �, I STREET j i 1 1 7- 1 14-01 1 I I ?-- 11� t>. N '\' LEGEND BLOCX 166' W.B, 9 J B j —J Q N ;` POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing SAN Br RNARiJ' I NO DO, ( ) Title to State NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distonces and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 6 1. - FEE ACQUISITION distances. All distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. �—pMMIMM,,- FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 iUtton Centre Drive:, Ste. 200 Santa Ana. California 92707 0 14)/51 /373/(714)545-88U (Fax; DATE: 11-03-11 REV.:2; 05-09-12 EA: OF540 FAu: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 9 1 6. 5 1 1 - EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `B1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22261-2 Temporary Construction Easement APN 117-111-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described as Parcel 1 in each of the deeds recorded June 22, 2000 as Document No. 2000-241350 and July 6, 2007 as Document No. 2007-0441129, of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the existing northerly right of way line of Third Street, said line lying 30.00 feet northerly of and perpendicularly distant from the original centerline thereof, with the original centerline of the north -south alley in Block 177 of the plat of "South Riverside Town Site" as said block is shown on the map filed in Book 9 of Maps, Page 8, San Bernardino County Records, said point also being the southeasterly corner of said land; thence North 81 °57'09" West 89.41 feet along a portion of the southerly line of said land to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 35°48'26" West 25.80 feet; thence North 10°10'50" East 42.33 feet to a point on the general westerly line of said land; said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 40.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 35°57'19" West; thence northeasterly along said general westerly line and said curve 13.69 feet through a central angle of 19°36'15"; thence South 23°31'54" East 10.36 feet; thence South 68°31'01" West 7.90 feet; thence South 10°10'50" West 33.75 feet; thence South 35°48'25" East 22.91 feet; thence South 81 °57'09" East 32.02 feet; thence South 08°02'51" West 5.60 feet to a point on said southerly line; thence North 81°57'09" West 40.16 feet along a portion of said southerly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 932 square feet. P:\2PTG010501 \SURVEY\LEGALS\22261_APN_117-I 11-001\Legals\22261-2_TCE.doc 5/8/2012 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 See Exhibit B2' attached hereto and made a part hereof.. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of: Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 5-08- J2 Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEY\L G-ALS\22261,APN_I17-111-001\Legals\22261-2_TCE.doe 5/8/2012 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 EX IBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22261-2 TCE JAMESON / MELLOR 932 SQ.FT. 117-111-001 N16°21103"W (R) R=40.00' L=13.69'`� I A=19°36'15" I N35° 57'1 9''W (R)' J ° S81 57'33"E 77.94' I R=40.00' L=62.82" Li A=99°59'1 i Cc PROPOSED Cr) ' N08° 03'1 12.14' u EXISTING oeee L3 DOC. NOS. 5" 2000+-241350 & 2007-0441 1 29 O.R. L4 r Jr� , r- r I r- R/W r' Jr �J t.� N J 1 i• I i:, 1 fi r' 11 a � 2"E J IL OCR 1 l 7 i rah' ' M,B., 9 I 2' 'Y' 0 SAN BERNARDJ NO CO, 0 :. 6 otn R/W- L7 L8 c a ,1 t 1 N-- 40.16' 49.25` L=31 .42' N81 ° 57'09"W 89.41 ' " — POB A=90° 00'21 97.92' c3 TPOB' ------ --- - - --- --- ___ THIRD -- _____ i STREET LINE DATA Z BEARING DISTANCE_ .-. Q L1 N35°48`26"W 25.80' A'0 L2 N10° 1 0'50"E 42.33' L3 523° 31 '54"E 1 0.36' ' >- a L4 S68° 31 '01 "W 7.90' Lii i LEGEND L5 S10°10'50"W 33.75' POB Indicates Point Of Beginning L6 S35°48'25"E 22.91' I Q TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing L7 S81°57'09"E 32.02` (-Title to State L8 S08°02'51"W 5.60' NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground 2 2 2 6 1- 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT distances. All distances are in feet--pmmomm. unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 15 30 60 90 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 I{uttro ::entre Drive, Ste. 'tMo SJnto ' 041-,51-7' 3/347�i4)Sr45-FP.93 Fnxa DATE: 11-03-11 REV.:2; 05-09-12 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 6.5 1 1 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 117-111-001 and 117-111-002 (CPN 22261): David W. Jameson, Co -Trustee or His Successor Trustee Under the Jameson Trust dated May 15, 2000 1950 Upas Street, #207 San Diego, CA 92879 Record Owner Jennifer J. Moffitt, Co -Trustee or Her Successor Record Owner Trustee Under the Jameson Trust dated May 15, 2000 1950 Upas Street, #207 San Diego, CA 92879 William Jameson Mellor, Trustee of the William J. Mellor 2005 Revocable Trust Under Declaration of Trust dated August 15, 2005 518 Greengate Street Corona, CA 92879 DATED: May 24, 2013. Record Owner Margaret I Barnes 17336.02100\7984244.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7966485.2 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 24, 2013. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: Mark A. Easte Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7966485.2 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\7980141.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1.7 18 19 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SO EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22138-1 Fee Acquisition APN 102-102-020 In the County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded August 27, 2008 as Document No. 2008-472052 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the northeasterly comer of said land; thence South 42°50'35" West 59.34 feet along the general easterly line of said land; thence North 23°59'41" West 23.67 feet; thence North 88°28' 17" West 211.96 feet; thence South 42°07'33" West 18.40 feet to a point on the general westerly line of said land, said point being the beginning of a non- tangent curve concave easterly having a radius of 70.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 85°45'54" West; thence along the general westerly and northerly lines of said land the following four (4) course: 1) northerly along said curve 16.70 feet through a central angle of 13°40'19"; 2) North 09°26'13" East 44.94 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 13.00 feet; 3) northerly, northeasterly and easterly along said curve 20.42 feet through a central angle of 90°00'39"; and 4) South 80°33'08" East 254.58 feet to the Point of Beginning, Containing 11,411 square feet. See Exhibit `AT attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. RQPIG0105011SURVEY\LEGAL5122138_APN_102-102-020Tegals122138-1-FEE.docx Page 1. of 10/5/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 SO Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date /o -d5; P:\2PT6010501`SURVEYILEGALS122138_APN_102-102-020Tegals122138-1-FEE.docx Page 2 of 2 10'5/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 221 38-1 FEE 2000 FRONTAGE ROAD TRUST 1 g411 SOFT. 102-102-020 211 212 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LINE DATA TABLE NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1 N23°59'41"W 23.67' L2 S42°07'33"W 18.40' L3 S85°45'54"W(R} 70.00' PROPOSED_,,_ STATE R/W^` 102-101-033 FROM TA GE RD. L2 LEGEND POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C ) Title to State I I 1 1 1 Access Prohibited 21 3 214 CURVE DATA TABLE NO. DELTA RADIUS DISTANCE Cl 90°00'00" 13.00' 20.42' C2 56°35'38" 70.00` 69.14' C3 90°00'39" 13.00` 20.42' C4 13°40'19" 70.00' 16.70' ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY EXISTING R/W S80°33'08„ PROPOSED R/W .0 Cl 254,58, L1 POB 102-250-045 NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 22138-1 FEE ACQUISITION FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: 3 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Santa Ana, California 02707 (714)751-737'3/(714)545-682.3 (Fax) DATE: 10-05-2012 REV.: EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 4.0 1 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 EXHIBIT `Bl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22138-2 I 5 Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 102-102-020 7 8 In the County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in 9 that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded August 27, 2008 as Document No. 2008-472052 of 10 Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said land; thence South 42°50'35" West 59.34 13 feet along the general easterly line of said land; thence North 23°59'41" West 23.67 feet; 14 thence North 88°28'17" West 128.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 15 01 °31'43" West 5.00 feet; thence North 88°28'17" West 32.00 feet; thence North 16 01°31'43" East 5.00 feet; thence South 88°28'17" East 32.00 feet to the True Point of 17 ' Beginning. 18 19 Containing 160 square feet. 20 21 See Exhibit 132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 25 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 27 28 29 30 31. PA2PTGOI0501\SURVEY\LEGALS1221.38_APN_102-102-0201Legals\221.38-2-TCE.docx Page I oft 10/5/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 /©-425- l2 Date PA2PTG010501\SURVEY \LEGALS122138_A:PN_102-102-020;Lega1s\22138-2-TCE.docx Page 2 of 10/5/2012 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22138-2 TCE 2000 FRONTAGE ROAD TRUST 160 SO.FT. 102-102-020 211 I ----I 21 213 214 ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY C/L STATIONING LINE DATA TABLE CURVE DATA TABLE NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1 "W N23° 59'41 23.67' NO. DELTA RADIUS DISTANCE L2 S01°31'43"W 5.00' Cl 90°00'00" 1 3.00' 20.42' L3 N01 °31 '43"E 5.00' C2 56°35'38" 70.00' 69.14' L4. N88°28'17"W 32.00' C3 90° 00'39" 1 3.00' 20.4 2 ` ROUTE 91 RIVERSIDE FREEWAY PROPOSED'-._` _ FRQnirAEXISTING RiW STATE R/W r ---_1 GERf) -- - -- , `Y' '�r _ -_ _ s -- _ _- C3 EXISTING �3 0g„E 254.58+ POB—__ � 3 TPOB O N , ° ' o'° z I . ` � 1 N88°28'17"W 211.96' ° 3 2.0 0X i C2 L3 L4 128.36' �0). L2 L1 = \ PROPOSED R/W N, i NC . DOC , # 7002-479057 D , R , �'L� � q� t ,'�``' i o .v ��9 �,� ° � r O ° � 0 O Os- r7 �� LEGEND is �O POB Indicates Point Of Beginning TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning (R) Indicates Radial Bearing p' /`/ �p C1 ,- / `pjf;„ /` ( )Title to State /f 102-250-045� I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain 1 3 8 — TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 .m5 immemmummi FEET 0 25 50 140 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS - i?uttor Cerir•e Drive, Ste,. 7GC Sar+n Arta Celiforhia ?27G? (; tq}751-33'l3/(714)5A5-98S3 (Pax) DATE:10-05-2012 REV.: EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4.0 1 1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-102-020 (CPN 22138): BBE & W Standard Common Direct 20390 Christo Court Record Owner Perris, CA 92570 Charlie R. Webb Record Owner 3410 La Sierra Avenue, #F-706 Riverside, CA 92503 Rosina G. Webb Record Owner 3410 La Sierra Avenue, #F-706 Riverside, CA 92503 B.B.E.&W. Standard Common Direction Courtesy Copy Service Company, LLC c/o Dale Bethel, Esq. 631 New Jersey Street, Suite 101 Redlands, CA 92373 DATED: May 24, 2013. 0 Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\7966485.2 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7979715.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 24, 2013. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BE T & KRIEGER LLP By: Mark A. Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7979715.1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, state of California, described as follows: ° FEE That portion of the Tomas Yorba Allotment shown as Parcel l on a map on file in Book 7, Page 77 of Parcel Maps, records of Riverside County, California, lying within the following described property: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 46 in Tract No. 2319, as shown by map on file in Book 43. Pages 74 to 76, of maps, records of Riverside County; Thence along the Northerly prolongation of the Westerly line of said Lot 46, being along the Easterly line of Ridgeview Terrace 60 feet wide, North 15° 29' 00" East, 28.32 feet to the to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 15° 29' 00" East, 97.13 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Westerly and having a radius of 230 feet; Thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 11 ° 3 l' 15", an arc distance of 46.25 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 13 feet; Thence Northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 83° 04' 46", an arc distance of 18.85 feet to a point of tangency on the South line of Frontage Road, 30 feet wide; Thence along said South line North 87° 02' 31" East, 102.96 feet to the beginning of a curve therein; Thence parallel with the aforesaid Easterly line of Ridgeview Terrace, South 15° 29' 00" West, 175.18 feet to a line parallel with and 28 feet Northerly at right angles from the North line of aforesaid Lot 46; Thence along said parallel line, North 83° 07' 17" West, 102.82 feet to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the following land conveyed to the County of Riverside and described as follows: All of that portion of land conveyed to Milton Enterprises, Inc., by receiver's deed recorded November 2, 1972 as instrument no. 146342, of official records of Riverside County, California and lying within the following described strip of land: that portion of the Tomas Yorba Allotment as shown by map on file in Book 2. Page 7, of maps, records of San Bernardino County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 46 in Tract No. 2319, as shown by map on file in Book 43. Page 74 of maps, records of Riverside County, California, said Northwest corner being a point in the East line of Ridgeview Terrace (60 feet wide); Thence North 15° 29' 00" East, 125.45 feet on said East line of Ridgeview Terrace to the beginning of a curve therein, concave Westerly 230 feet radius; Thence Northerly 46.46 feet on said curve, through a central angle of 11° 34' 22" to the to the true point of beginning, being at a point of reverse curvature through which a radial line bears South 86° 05' 22" East; Thence Northeasterly along a curve, concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 13 feet, through a central angle of 83° 07' 53", an arc distance of 18.86 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Frontage Road, 50 feet wide; Thence tangent to said curve and along said Southerly line North 87° 02' 31" East, 102.97 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1,344 feet; Thence Easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 11 ° 36' 29"an arc distance of 272.29 feet; EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 Thence tangent to said curve and continuing along the South line of Frontage Road, South 81 ° 21' 00" East, 944.44 feet to the West line of an existing alley, 20 feet wide; Thence along said West line, South 8° 39' 00" West, 2 feet; Thence parallel with Frontage Road, North 81° 21' 00" West, 944.44 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Southerly and having a radius of 1,342 feet; Thence Westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 11 ° 36' 29", an arc distance of 271.89 feet; Thence tangent to said curve, South 87° 02' 31" West, 105.22 feet; Thence South 45° 28' 34" West, 14.24 feet to the True Point of Beginning. APN: 102-092-001-1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 S 3DVd `V 1191HX3 THIS MAP /S FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY ASSESSOR'S MAP BK.IO2 PG.09 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF POR. SEC.28, r 3 S., R. TW. (POR. RO. LA S/ERRA YORBA J 24 S-FATE HWY ALB. 43/74-76 Tract No.2319 M..8.47/10-14 Tract No. 2585 PM. 7/77 Parcel Map 4691 P. M.1/4/92-93 /8618 0 T. R. A. 5933 59 40 NOV.. 1974 /Ss 9 -32-3 / 02-09 r !"= TOO' O/Te 9/74 Oc ONa 20 s/IJ 49041 r-Jr I-IJ 0160.1 ,4143 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-092-001 (CPN 22132): Gary S. Elster, Trustee pursuant to that certain Declaration of Trust known as The Elster Family trust, dated July 30, 1976 12 Malihini Place Wailuku, HI 96793 Pamela C. Elster, Trustee pursuant to that certain Declaration of Trust known as The Elster Family trust, dated July 30, 1976 12 Malihini Place Wailuku, HI 96793 Gary S. Elster, Trustee pursuant to that certain Declaration of Trust known as The Elster Family trust, dated July 30, 1976 2260 Frontage Road Corona, CA 92882 Pamela C. Elster, Trustee pursuant to that certain Declaration of Trust known as The Elster Family trust, dated July 30, 1976 2260 Frontage Road Corona, CA 92882 DATED: May 24, 2013. Record Owner Record Owner Record Owner Record Owner Margaret t. Barnes 17336.02100\7979715.1 ORIGINAL NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of a fee interest in certain real property for public use which, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, Riverside County, California. The legal description of the property to be acquired is defined and described in Exhibit "A" attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\7978931.1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3) provides that your failure to file a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days after the mailing of this notice will result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 24, 2013. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: fl cy-a `Y Mark A Easter Mona Nemat Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\7978931.1 FEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel A: That portion of the South one-half of Lot 3 in Block 73 of the Lands of the South Riverside Land and Water Company and of Pearl Street (60 feet wide) abandoned, all as shown on map thereof on file in Book 9 page(s) 6 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence North 00° 33' 22" East along the Easterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 151.43 feet to a point of non -tangency in the curved Southerly line of the parcel of land conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded January 20, 1959 as Instrument No. 4752, in Book 2399 page(s) 419 of Official Records of Riverside County, said curved Southerly line being concave Northerly and having a radius of 6,000 feet; thence Westerly along the arc of said curved Southerly line from an initial radial line bearing North 00° 24' 14" East through a central angle of 02 50' 35" a distance of 297.72 feet to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 50 feet; thence Westerly, Southwesterly, Southerly and Southeasterly along the arc of said reverse curve through a central angle of 122 25' 11" a distance of 106.83 feet to a point of reverse curvature with the curved Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard, 100 feet wide, as shown on said map, last said curve being concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 2,376.85 feet; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curved Northeasterly line of Grand Boulevard through a central angle of 02° 15' 36" a distance of 93.75 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 3; thence South 89° 15' 24" East along said Southerly line a distance of 298.50 feet to the point of beginning. Assessor's Parcel Number 117-270-009-7 Parcel B: Parcel 1, in the City of Riverside, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 23, Page 70 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. Except therefrom that portion thereof lying below a depth of 500 feet, measured vertically, from the contour of the surface of said property; however, Grantor, or its successors and assigns, shall not have the right for any purpose whatsoever to enter upon, into or through the surface of said property or any part thereof lying between said surface and 500 feet below said surface, as more particularly set forth by the certain document recorded September 18, 1985 as Instrument No. 209628 of Official Records. Assessor's Parcel Number 117-270-018-5 17336.02100\7979123.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 POR. CITY OF CORONA (POR. SEC. 30, T. 3S.R. 6 W, 9 POR SOUTH R/V. LAND AND WATER CO. ) C r '/-.4EW. L/NE 30 N S i V / 3.754:4c �1 �o.o,1AC. 1::,„ Y RIVE ` \L r F4. RA %Y RT. 9/ ' ) �3�, - Lot . '7' •4 Ite B/A: 73 !. IA h \5 DATA NWT MAP IS I3/66 RS.63/2/ IS 6I/J7 ASSESSORS MAP BK. //7 PG 27 R/V£RS/OE COUNTY, CAL/E SIE I7Z- - • Pm,. Per. It ase M pR. /4`rA%7. 38E I72-JJ-/OI-• // N/ I ONLY 3.3/ tdr. T. R. A. 4 /8 AM M.8 9/6, B S.B. South Riverside Land a Water Co. A. M. B. //42- 43 Assessor's Mop No. 3/ P. M. 23/70 / / 7 -27 g- is SEPT. /974 i Zoo' PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 24, 2013, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 117-270-009 and 117-270-018 (CPN 22295): M. Hebbard MacArthur, Trustee of The MacArthur Separate Property Trust 2185 Adams Street Riverside, CA 92504 Shrirley M. MacArthur Trust 2185 Adams Street Riverside, CA 92504 Christopher H. MacArthur 2185 Adams Street Riverside, CA 92504 DATED: May 24, 2013. Record Owner Record Owner Record Owner .s ; Margaret 14. Barnes 17336.02100\7978931.1 • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Transit Services Funding Allocation for Fiscal Year 2013/14 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2013/14 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2013/14 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 13-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds".. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its June 2013 meeting, the Commission approved in concept the FYs 2013/14 - 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; the Commission's Commuter Rail Program; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine). Through the annual SRTP process, a series of service changes and capital program additions are recommended, designed to increase ridership and improve economic performance. The core elements of each agency's SRTP include the operating plan, capital program, and accompanying financial plans. These elements provide the basis for the Commission's oversight activities to ensure compliance with federal regulations, the Transportation Development Act (TDA), state law, and Commission -adopted guidelines and policies. Throughout the development and execution of the SRTPs, the Commission maintains its immediate focus by providing a comprehensive transit system for county residents and commuters. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality, safety, and cost Agenda Item 7 150 effectiveness of the transit system, maximize ridership potential and sustain • ongoing service coordination efforts with other regional public transit operators and specialized transit providers. In January 2013, the Commission approved the FY 2013/14 revenue projections, indicating a decrease of approximately 11 percent in LTF and 5 percent increase in Measure A funding compared to the FY 2012/13 revised projections. The California State Controller's office also released the STA preliminary allocation estimates for the region for FY 2013/14, providing a third year continuation of STA funding for transit since the temporary allocation freeze in 2010 and 2011. Earlier this year, Caltrans and California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) also released partial Proposition 1 B funding for transit, based on available proceeds from the most recent bond sale. With these recent gains in transit revenues, public operators are able to initiate the procurement process for various capital projects, most of which were planned and programmed under prior SRTPs but was placed on hold due to financial constraints. Despite the optimistic outlook in state and local revenues, federal transit revenue is slightly dampened resulting from the ongoing dispute between the Department of Labor and the state of California pertaining to the Section 13(c) issue of the Federal Transit Act. The Section 13(c) issue relates to the governor's pension reform bill, and the dispute is preventing release of federal funds including FTA Section 5307 program funds, from which urban operators rely heavily for operating and capital support. As the financial instability in the revenue stream continues, the Commission will work with the operators to adjust and maintain the current conservative management of transit funds to ensure that sufficient reserves are available to sustain and improve current service in the county. Any proposed use of reserves will be brought back for Commission approval. SRTP Financial and Ridership Overview Approximately $181 .6 million in total funding is required to support the operating and capital requests for the provision of Riverside County transit services. The following table provides an overview of the total operating and capital costs together with projected ridership levels by apportionment area. • Agenda Item 7 151 • • • FY 2013/14 Operating, Capital and Ridership Projections Expense T Ex p Type Western Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Bus Rail Operating Capital $ 69,945,534 20,485,842 $ 21,234,200 355,748 $ 24,950,824 6,526,870 $ 913,416 350,569 $ 117,043,974 27,719,029 Total (Operating & Capital) $ 90,431,376 $ 21,589,948 $ 31,477,694 $ 1,263,985 $ 144,763,003 Leverage of Commuter Rail Funds* $ 36,816,000 $ 36,816,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 90,431,376 $ 58,405,948 $ 31,477,694 $ 1,263,985 $ 181,579,003 FY 2013/14 Projected Ridership 9,869,165 3,143,332 5,190,418 45,794 18,248,709 * LA Metro, OCTA & SANBAG's share and passenger fare revenues for Commuter Rail expenses Ridership estimates for FY 2012/13 indicate an all-time ridership record of about 17.4 million passengers in Riverside County, an increase of 2 percent over FY 201 1 /12. Likewise, the funding plan for FY 2013/14 as shown in Attachment 4 is projected to generate 18.3 million in ridership, 5 percent higher than the forecast for FY 2012/13. Funding levels for next year's transit operations reflect a systemwide increase of 6.5 percent in total operating expenses and a significant decrease of 89 percent in capital expenditures. Capital funds programmed in FY 2012/13 were especially high due to the expenses associated with the completion of preliminary engineering and final design, right of way acquisition and completion of environmental assessment for the Perris Valley Line project. In addition, RTA's planned capital spending is reduced substantially in FY 2013/14 with less funds programmed for its major vehicle purchase of heavy duty vehicles. Funding is now complete for RTA's vehicle procurement with the recent receipt of approximately $13.3 million in Proposition 1 B Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement (PTMISEA) bond monies intended to replace the agency's 85 older fixed route buses. FY 2013/14 Operating and Capital Costs To implement the SRTPs for FY 2013/14, the request is to utilize approximately $117 million for operating and $27.7 million for capital in addition to the $36.8 million share from Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), and Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) to leverage the Commuter. Rail Program. The chart following Agenda Item 7 152 to support the county's transit operations. RIVERSIDE DUTY: IFY 201 VI4 it )i)C w TON° and CAPITAL COSTS • iM+S#"..,n Mr . 41440. i..n.irm- „w..d . 4=.144.4.I. s%w*Iilh • -`illF + Pi - r.r,,,„..•.wwukiw.wF r.. H� ■rRilmi• #s + %ri1Yi.impi a..wi *IIIIA . 1.1• lei. tip 41.1 i Mr Approximately $72.7 million (40 percent) of the $181.6 million total operating and capital costs identified in the chart is funded by the following sources: • $38.1 million Passenger fares • $20.3 million Additional operating subsidy from Commuter rail member agencies • $10.8 million Carryover funds - LTF, STA, 5307, 5309, Measure A, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees • $3.5million Miscellaneous other revenues (bus shelter advertising, general fund contributions, Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project revenue, Southern California Regional Rail Authority pass -through funds for security guards, pass -through fundsfrom Measure A Western County Commuter Assistance funds for the Perris Multimodal Transit Center, compressed natural gas sales, federal excise credit, CaIPERS reimbursement, Calstart funds, and interest income) provides an overview of the operating and capital costs by funding source required • • Agenda Item 7 153 • • The remaining balance of approximately $108.9 million (60 percent) consists of federal, state, and local funds, including Proposition 1 B funds that are primarily allocated through Commission action. Transportation Development Act Funding TDA is one of the major funding sources for public transit in California and provides two funding sources - LTF and STA for transit capital, operations, and planning. The LTF funds are derived from a quarter cent of the statewide general sales tax collected in each county. The State Board of Equalization returns the sales tax revenues to Riverside County where it is held until the Commission provides written allocation instructions for disbursement. It is estimated that LTF revenue for transit services for FY 2013/14 will be $67,589,865, which is consistent with the revenue projection provided at the January 2013 Commission meeting. STA funding is derived from sales tax on diesel fuel. Fifty percent of STA funds are allocated according to population and the other 50 percent is allocated according to the ratio of fare revenues generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. For Riverside County, there is approximately $33 million in STA unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2012/13. Additional revenues of $11.9 million are anticipated in FY 2013/14 for a total available amount of $44.9 million. About $4.2 million of this available balance will be utilized by county transit operators for various capital projects in FY 2013/14. In 'March 2010, the Commission adopted a revised policy requiring all operators to spend down existing capital balances prior to requesting additional funds. As a result, the current level of STA fund balance has gradually improved since the resumption of STA funding after a temporary freeze four years ago. The fund reserve will greatly sustain and prepare for future capital needs of county operators while also serving as a cushion in the event of loss of STA or additional economic uncertainty. Prior to approving STA allocations, the Commission must adopt the attached resolution as specified in the TDA statutes and California Code of Regulations. For public transit operators to claim LTF and/or STA funds, the Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in the FY 2013/14 SRTPs. The requested allocations need to be consistent with the approved SRTPs, and the funds are explicitly for the projects stated in the approved plans. Attachment 2 outlines the TDA allocations for FY 2013/14 requested by each operator. Measure A Funding Another primary source of funding for transit comes from Measure A — the half cent sales tax transportation initiative in Riverside County. Measure A funds for Agenda Item 7 154 transit programs in Western County and Coachella Valley provide funding support for specialized transit, intercity bus services, and commuter rail. About 4 percent of the FY 2013/14 proposed operating and capital expenditures will be covered by Measure A funds. Measure A spending plan for public transit is outlined below. Measure A Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA S 2,752,208 SunLine 5,217,000 Total $ 7,969,208 Proposition 18 Funding Proposition 1 B approved by California voters in November 2006, authorizes the sale of $20 billion in state general obligation bonds for transportation purposes. Bond proceeds are to fund various transportation programs, including the Proposition 1 B PTMISEA capital program administered by Caltrans and the California Transit Security Grant Program (Security) managed by Cal EMA. Sale of the bonds is subject to annual appropriations in the state budget and is expected to be spread across several fiscal years. For FY 2012/13, Riverside County was appropriated approximately $1.8 million in Proposition 1 B Security Grant funds through Cal EMA. About $44.6 million in Proposition 1 B capital funding was also appropriated to the region to cover a three- year spending plan for FY 2010/11 — FY 2012/13. Each region is guaranteed a share of Proposition 1 B funds by formula; however, these funds will be distributed as bonds are sold. Recent Proposition 1 B PTMISEA funds released by Caltrans in November 2012 and May 2013 included about $17.8 million awarded to transit agencies in Riverside County for various capital projects. Proposition 1 B funds programmed by agencies for FY 2013/14 are as follows: Agency Proposition 18 Capital Security City of Banning S 470,774 City of Beaumont 459,151 City of Corona 970,442 City of Riverside RTA 13, 344, 315 Commuter Rail SunLine PVVTA S 56,866 - 55,471 77,650 96,014 894,790 355,748 371,870 19,569 Total $ 15,244,682 $ 1,927,978 • • Agenda Item 7 155 • • The cities . of Banning, Beaumont, and Corona programmed their shares of Proposition 1 B FY 2010/1 1 capital allocation to procure replacement coaches. RTA programmed its $13.3 million Proposition 1B FY 2010/11 capital award to partially fund the purchase of 85 replacement heavy-duty buses for fixed routes. Approximately $1.9 million in Proposition 1 B security funds are programmed by the eight transit operators for various safety and security projects including wireless and land -mobile communication systems, video cameras, and rail station surveillance system upgrades. The Proposition 1 B program does not require agencies to provide matching funds. FY 2013/14 Federal Funds Section 5307 Formula Funds FTA's Section 5307 funds are distributed to regions on urbanized area formula to provide transit capital and operating assistance to urbanized areas with a population of 50,OOO or more. Riverside County consists of four urbanized areas (UZA), namely: • Riverside/San Bernardino; • Hemet/San Jacinto; • Temecula/Murrieta; and • Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs. The Commission must develop and approve a POP for each UZA and conduct a public hearing prior to an operator submitting its Section 5307 grant application to FTA. If the draft POP is not amended through the public hearing process, the POP will become final as presented and will be included in an approved FTIP, which is subsequently forwarded to the Southern California Association of Governments for review and processing. Attachment 2 shows the proposed Section 5307 POP for Riverside County. Section 5307 funds requested by operator are shown below: FY 2013/14 Section 5307 Requested Funds Agency Amount City of Riverside $ 336,000 RTA 13,468,753 SunLine 1,544,414 Total $ 15,349,167 The actual Section 5307 apportionments for FY 2013/14 will not be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by Congress. The POP was developed at the highest anticipated funding amount based on actual available apportionments for FY 2012/13 to allow the operators to proceed with the grant Agenda Item 7 156 applications and avoid delays associated with program amendments should the actual apportionments come in lower than estimated. Any excess funds will be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year and will be made available to cover future projects. Section 5311 Funds The Federal Section 5311 transit funding provides formula funds to rural or non - urbanized areas in the state. The program is administered by Caltrans and majority of these funds are passed through to counties based on population formula. Remaining funds are awarded in a statewide discretionary program for rural capital projects and intercity bus programs. The Commission must develop and approve a Section 5311 POP before grants are approved. This year's program allocates $845,188 in formula funds for Riverside County and as in previous years, both RTA and SunLine identified the use of Section 5311 formula funds for operating. FY 2013/14 Section 5311 Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA SunLine Total $ 425,000 420,188 845,188 Section 5316 & 5317 Formula Funds Federal programs Section 5316 - Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and Section 5317 - New Freedom were established to meet the transportation needs of the low-income population, welfare recipients, and persons with disabilities. Projects funded under this program must be contained in a locally -developed Public Transit -Human Service Transportation Plan. Under the 2013 Specialized Transit Universal Call for Projects, RTA, SunLine, and PVVTA were awarded federal JARC and New Freedom funds to cover expenses for RTA's Commuter Link 212 and 217, extended fixed route services and travel training; SunLine's new North Shore fixed route service scheduled to start in September 2013; and PVVTA's mobility management program. Funds made available through the 2013 Call are fund balances from SAFETEA-LU and will be disbursed and administered under the previous guidelines. Funding allotments for FY 2013/14 are as follows: Agency RTA SunLine PVVTA Total Section 5316 (JARC) S 422,000 208,665 300,000 Section 5317 (NF) $ 52,000 46,000 22,210 930,665 $ 120,210 • Agenda Item 7 157 • • Summary Staff recommendation is to approve the TDA and FTA funds as presented. If any additional funding revenue becomes available- during the budget year, transit operators will prepare the necessary SRTP amendments, as appropriate, to identify new or expanded services and capital projects. Modifications in farebox revenues, federal grants, Measure A funding, or carryover funds may require operators to revise their services to operate within the funding limit available. Fiscal Impact Funding allocations are based on the revenue estimates developed for the FY 2013/14 Commission's budget. The budget adopted at the June 2013 Commission meeting included $64.8 million in LTF transit operating expenditures, $14.6 million in LTF transit capital expenditures, and $25.9 million in STA capital expenditures. These budgeted expenditures, which include use of prior year capital allocations, are expected to be funded by FY 2013/14 revenues, as well as available fund balances. Based on these recommended allocations, no budget adjustments are required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2013/14 Amount: $62,203,866 (LTF) $ 4,238,481 (STA) Source of Funds: TDA: LTF and STA Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE Western County Bus Western County Bus 601 62 86101 P2210 $ 41,307,456 Western County Rail 241 62 86102 P2201 $1,375,616 241 62 86102 P2204 $ 0 Coachella Valley 601 62 86101 P2213 $8,337,200 Coachella Valley 241 62 86102 P2202 $ 2,831,865 Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P221 1 $ 11,768,614 Palo Verde Valley 241 62 86102 P2203 $ 31,000 601 62 86101 P2212 $ 790,596 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \Paideivi-Le Date: 06/18/13 Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 13-012 2) TDA Spreadsheets (STA and LTF) 3) Section 5307 Program of Projects 4) FY 2013/14 and FY 2012/13 Operating and Capital Requests and Ridership Projections Agenda Item 7 158 ATTACHMENT 1 • RESOLUTION NO. 13-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is designated the regional entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has examined the Short Range Transit Plans and Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to meet the fare revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Federal Transit Act; and WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit assistance fund and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide public transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 99244; and WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers or persons operating under a franchise or license; and WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance with Section 18081.1 of the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251. 159 ATTACHMENT 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to ,allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 2013/14 as detailed in Attachment 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2013. Karen S. Spiegel, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside ,County Transportation Commission 160 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2013/14 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS • ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 2 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA RECOMMENDED STA STA Operating STA Capital CARRY OVER TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS FUNDS FOR FY 2013/14 FY 2013/14 FY 2013/14 City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Corona Riverside Special Services Riverside Transit Agency $ - $ - $ 326,267 - 293,283 - 4,000 - 752,066 - $ - 326,267 - 293,283 - 4,000 - 752,066 $ - $ - 326,267 - 293,283 - 4,000 - 752,066 TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS - 1,375,616 - 1,375,616 - 1,375,616 RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) - - - - - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - COMMUTER RAIL - - - - - - SunLine Transit Agency - 2,831,865 - 2,831,865 - 2,831,865 TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY - 2,831,865 - 2,831,865 - 2,831,865 Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency - 31,000 - 31,000 - 31,000 TOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY 31,000 31,000 - 31,000 COUNTY WIDE TOTAL $ - $ 4,238,481 $ - $ 4,238,481 $ - $ 4,238,481 161 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2013/14 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED NON RECOMMENDED LTF OPERATING LTF CAPITAL LTF TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS TOTAL COSTS LTF REVENUES FOR FY 2013114 FY 2013/14 FY 2013/14 City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Corona Riverside Special Services Riverside Transit Agency $ 1,293,675 1,965,410 2,108,647 3,395,960 61,181,842 $ 527,640 840,889 1,341,375 116,014 17,659,924 $ 1,821,315 2,806,299 3,450,022 3,511,974 78,841,766 $ 678,976 1,037,429 1,763,105 802,644 44,841,766 $ 1,142,339 1,768,870 1,686,917 2,709,330 34,000,000 $ 1,142,339 $ - 1,768,870 - 1,686,917 - 2,709,330 - 34,000,000 - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS 69,945,534 20,485,842 90,431,376 49,123,920 41,307,456 41,307,456 - RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) 21,234,200 355,748 21,589,948 13,252,748 8,337,200 8,337,200 - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - COMMUTER RAIL* 21,234,200 355,748 21,589,948 13,252,748 8,337,200 8,337,200 - SunLine Transit Agency 24,950,824 6,526,870 31,477,694 19,709,080 11,768,614 11,768,614 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY 24,950,824 6,526,870 31,477,694 19,709,080 11,768,614 11,768,614 Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 913,416 350,569 1,263,985 473,389 790,596 790,596 TOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY 913,416 350,569 1,263,985 473,389 ` 790,596 790,596- COUNTYWIDE TOTAL $ 117,043,974 $ 27,719,02.9 $ 144,763,003 $ 82,559,137 $ 62,203,866 $ 62,203,866 * Commuter Rail's operating costs are estimated at $58 million per Table 4 of SRTP. Of this amount, $21.2 million is RCTC's share of operating cost: ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2013114 URBANIZED AREA: RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY12-13 Fed Register & InterCo Allocation) Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover (Estimate) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests (SRTP programmed) Balance (Projected) Sub Area Allocation Riverside, City of Riverside Transit Agency NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS Riverside, City of 1) Preventive Maintenance 2) Lease of Office Equipment Bus Rail Total $ 10,970,396 $ 5,777,825 $16,748,221 6,531, 744 11,608,446 18,140,190 17,502,140 17,386,271 34,888,411 8,704,528 - 8,704,528 $ 8,797,612 $ 17,386,271 $26,183,883 $ 336,000 8,368,528 TOTAL $ 8,704,528 TOTAL: City of Riverside Riverside Transit Agency 3) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 4) Capital Cost of Contracting 5) Replacement Revenue Vehicles - (13) COFR TOTAL: Riverside Transit Agency Updated: 6/13/2013 Approved: 7/10/2013 (pending) TOTAL FEDERAL AMOUNT SHARE 400,000 20,000 420,000 $ 7,020,000 5,200,000 2,371,720 $ 14,591,720 PROJECT DESIGNATED TYPE RECIPIENT $ 320,000 Capital/Operating 16,000 Capital $ 336,000 $ 4,200,000 2,200,000 1,968,528 $ 8,368,528 GRAND TOTAL $ 15,011,720 $ 8,704,528 Capital/Operating Capital/Operating Capital SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG 163 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 2 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2013/14 URBANIZED AREA: HEMET/SAN. JACINTO RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY 12/13 Fed Register actuals) Apportionment $ 3,085,281 Carryover (estimate) 2,410,481 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) - Total Funds Available 5,495,762 Less Current Requests 1,700,000 Balance (Projected) $ 3,795,762 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 32,998,975 $ 1,700,000 Operating Caltrans TOTAL: $ 32,998,975 $ 1,700,000 Updated: 6/13/2013 Approved: 7/10/13 (pending) r 164 V:1JCIemente\SRTP 13.141P0P1Hemet -San Jacinto UZA13-14 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2013/14 URBANIZED AREA: INDIO/CATHEDRAL CITY/PALM SPRINGS RECIPIENT: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY 12/13 Fed Register actuals) Apportionment $ 4,077,980 Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover (Estimate) 5,035,933 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available 9,113,913 Less Current Requests 1,544,414 Balance (Projected) $ 7,569,499 NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS ATTACHMENT 3 Page 3 of 4 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Bus Rehabilitation (15 engines, trans) $ 825,000 $ 492,000 Capital SCAG 2) 4 Replacement Vans 440,000 96,000 Capital SCAG 3) Transit Enhancements (38 bus shelters-signage) 531,870 164,414 Capital SCAG 4) IT Projects 300,000 240,000 Capital SCAG New CNG Fueling Station Study and 5) Start Construction Thousand Palms 2,700,000 200,000 Capital SCAG 6) Replacement & New Service Vehicles 440,000 352,000 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $ 5,236,870 $ 1,544,414 Updated: 6/13/2013 Approved: 7/10/2013 (pending) 165 V:\JClemente\SRTP 13.14\POP\Indio-Coachella-P Springs 13-14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2013/14 URBANIZED AREA: TEMECULA/MURRIETA RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY 12/13 Fed Register actuals) Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS 1) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 2) Capital Cost of Contracting 3) Expansion Revenue Vehicles - (2)C0FR 4) Capitalized Tire Lease 5) Associated Transit Improvements 6) Maintenance/Support Equipment TOTAL: Updated: 6/13/2013 Approved: 7/10/13 (pending) $ 4,393,857 1,592,453 5,986,310 3,400,225 $ 2,586,085 TOTAL FEDERAL AMOUNT SHARE $ 7,020,000 $ 5,200,000 $ 364,880 $ 399,619 $ 250,000 $ 34,600 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 302,850 $ 319,695 $ 50,000 $ 27,680 $ 13,269,099 $ 3,400,225 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 4 of 4 PROJECT DESIGNATED TYPE RECIPIENT Capital/Operating Capital/Operating Capital Capital Capital Capital SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG 166 V:1JCIemente\SRTP 13.14\POP\Temecula-Murrieta13-14 • ATTACPIIIR°NT 4 Comparison of FY 2013/14 & FY 2012/13 Operating & Capital Costs and Ridership Projections OPERATING CAPITAL TOTAL COST RIDERSHIP AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA FY13/14 FY12/13 % Incr/Decr FY13/14 FY12/13 % Incr/Decr FY13/14 FY12/13 % Incr/Decr FY13/14 (Projection) FY12/13 (Estimate) % Incr/Decr City of Banning $ 1,293,675 $ 1,310,135 -1.26% $ 527,640 $ - - $ 1,821,315 $ 1,310,135 39.02% 169,724 145,149 16.93% City of Beaumont 1,965,410 1,417,500 38.65% 840,889 150,000 460.59% 2,806,299 1,567,500 79.03% 211,644 205,489 3.00% City of Corona 2,108,647 2,001,936 5.33% 1,341,375 600,000 123.56% 3,450,022 2,601,936 32.59% 229,929 227,019 1.28% Riverside Special Services 3,395,960 3,305,143 2.75% 116,014 1,047,195 -88.92% 3,511,974 4,352,338 -19.31% 177,000 169,520 4,41% Riverside Transit Agency 61,181,842 58,073,468 5.35% 17,659,924 32,709,176 -46.01% 78,841,766 90,782,644 -13.15% 9,080,868 8,872,922 2.34% Western County: Bus 69,945,534 66,108,182 5.80% 20,485,842 34,506,371 -40.63% 90,431,376 100,614,553 -10.12% 9,869,165 9,620,099 2.59% Western County: Rail 21,234,200 20,655,900 2.80% 355,748 202,672,276 -99.82% 21,589,948 223,328,176 -90.33% 3,143,332 3,038,667 3.44% WESTERN COUNTY: TOTAL (Bus & Rail) 91,179,734 86,764,082 5.09% 20,841,590 237,178,647 -91.21% 112,021,324 323,942,729 -65.42% 13,012,497 12,658,766 2.79% SunLine Transit Agency 24,950,824 22,276,993 12.00% 6,526,870 4,554,038 43.32% 31,477,694 26,831,031 17.32% 5,190,418 4,713,117 10.13% COACHELLA VALLEY: TOTAL 24,950,824 22,276,993 12.00% 6,526,870 4,554,038 43.32% 31,477,694 26,831,031 17.32% 5,190,418 4,713,117 10.13% Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 913,416 885,799 3.12% 350,569 336,728 4.11% 1,263,985 1,222,527 3.39% 45,794 44,020 4.03% PALO VERDE VALLEY: TOTAL 913,416 885,799 ,. 3.12% 350,569 336,728 4.11% 1,263,985 1,222,527 3.39% 45,794 44,020 4.03% TOTAL: ALL AREAS $ 117,043,974 $ 109,926,874 6.47% $ 27,719,029 $ 242,069,413 -88.55% $ 144,763,003 $ 351,996,287 -58.87% 18,248,709 17,415,903 4.78% Leverage of Commuter Rail Funds* FY 13/14 FY 12/13 % Incr/Decr $ 36,816,000 $ 35,035,200 5.08% Total: $ 181,579,003 $ 387,031,487-53.08% *Commuter Rail's costs include RCTC's share of approximately $21.2 million plus approximately $36.8 million in additional operating subsidy from partner agencies ($20,323,000) and Rail farebox revenue 016,493,000). Note: FY 2013/14 total cost includes $10,770,989 in LTF/STA/5307/5309/Meas A/TUMF carryover funds from prior year. 167 Riverside County Transportation Commission FY 2013/14 Funding Allocation for Riverside County Transit Services Short Range Transit Plans`: Riverside Transit Agency 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY Y 2014 TRANSIT FUNDING REQUEST $117 million- $28'million -_ FY: 012/13 and FY 201 4 OPERATING•• CAPITAL COSH" Operating Bus FY ] 2/13 193 (m) Rail Bus Capital FY 13/14 FY 13/14 21.2 (m) ` 27.4 (m) FY 12/13 2t;# (m) +6% FY 12/13 39.4(m) Rail 2 RIVERSIDE COU • FY 201 14 EXPENC4T Adopt Resol TraosPortation = 55 TA SeedOo COW TA fin d alto e Riverside Cowl i 5t't A$5100,1 CeFitt? 3 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 10, 2013 . TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager Grace Alvarez, Senior Staff Analyst Eric De Hate, Staff Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2014-18 Measure A Five -Year Capital Plans for Local Streets and Roads Improvement BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 2014-18 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies in order to receive LSR funds. First, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and the county must participate in either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Western County agencies must also participate in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan managed by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). Staff is in the process of obtaining confirmation from CVAG, WRCOG, and RCA regarding the current participation in their programs. The city of Beaumont is not a TUMF participant. Additionally, agencies are required to annually provide to the Commission a project status report for the prior year CIP, a five-year CIP detailing how the Measure A funds are to be expended, and an annual certification of maintenance of effort (MOE). On February 25, staff provided the local agencies with Measure A revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist in preparation of the required CIP. The required CIP and supporting documentation have been received from the following local agencies for approval: Agenda Item 9A 168 Western County: • Banning • Perris • Canyon Lake • Riverside • Corona • Riverside County • Lake Elsinore • San Jacinto • Moreno Valley • Temecula Eastern County: • Cathedral City • La Quinta • Desert Hot Springs . •. Palm Desert • Indian Wells • Palm Springs • Indio • Rancho Mirage The city of La Quinta recently requested to join the Measure A LSR program. The Commission approved the request to join the Measure A LSR at its June 12 meeting. Late submittals for the remaining cities of Blythe, Calimesa, Coachella, Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Menifee, Murrieta, Norco, and Wildomar will be presented to the Commission for approval at subsequent meetings. The FY 2013/14 Measure A LSR disbursements to local agencies with Commission -approved CIPs are expected to commence in September 2013. Attachment: FYs 2014-18 Measure A Five -Year CIPs - Posted on Commission Website • Agenda Item 9A 169 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF BANNING FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 City of Banning Public Works Department April 29, 2013 Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 31-d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 1111 APR 30 2013 RIVEFiSIDE COUNT RANSP RTAT!f ;N COMMISSION Subject: Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Medina: The City of Banning respectfully submits its Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2013/2014 — 2017/2018 as approved by the City Council during its regular meeting on April 23, 2013. Also enclosed With this letter you will find the City's MOE Certification Statement, Project Status Report for FY 2012/2013 along with a certified copy of the Resolution and Minute Order approving the Five -Year Measure "A" CIP Plan. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at (951) 922-3130. Sincerely, Art Vela, P.E. Senior Engineer Copy: Duane Burk, Director of Public Works File Enc. Certified Minute Order Certified Resolution Five -Year Measure "A" Plan Project Status Report MOE Certification Statement 99 E. Ramsey St. • P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3130 • Fax (951) 922-3141 City of Banning Office of the City Clerk April 25, 2013 MINUTE ORDER A regular meeting of the Banning City Council was called to order by Mayor Franklin on April 23, 2013 at 5:08 p.m. at the Banning Civic Center Council Chambers, 99 E. Ramsey Street, Banning, California. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmember Botts Councilmember Miller Councilmember Peterson Councilmember Welch Mayor Franklin COUNOL MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Andy Takata, City Manager David J. Aleshire, City Attorney June Overholt, Administrative Services Dir./Deputy City Manager Leonard Purvis, Chief of Police Duane Burk, Public Works Director Bill Manis, Economic Development Director Zai Abu Bakar, Community Development Director Fred Mason, Electric Utility Director Jessica Hicks, Office Specialist Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk CONSENT ITEMS 8. Resolution No. 2013-46, Approving the Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2013-46. 99 E. Ramsey St. • P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3102 • Fax (951) 922-3128 MINUTE ORDER Mayor Franklin opened the item for public comments. There were none. April 25, 2013 Page 2 Motion Welch/Peterson that the City Council approve Consent Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 9. Motion carried all in favor. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) I, Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk of the City of Banning, California do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct excerpt from the Regular City Council Meeting held in Banning, California, on April 23, 2013. Dated: (SEAL) Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk City of Banning, California RESOLUTION NO.2013-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEASURE "A" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, in 1988, Riverside County voters approved a 0.5% sales tax (Measure "A") over a 20-year span to be used toward improvements of state highways, local transit systems, and public streets; and WHEREAS, in 2002, Riverside County voters approved a 30-year extension of the Measure "A" 0.5% sales tax; and WHEREAS, each City in Riverside County is required by the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") to submit a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (attached as Exhibit "A"), as approved by its governing board, to indicate how Measure "A" funding is to be utilized over the next five years; and WHEREAS, RCTC has estimated that the City of Banning will receive a total of $2,496,000.00 in Measure "A" funds over the next five years; and WHEREAS, the program is intended to support local transit systems, street pavement rehabilitation and public street improvements at various locations; and WHEREAS, the priority list of street locations can be changed by the City Council during the design stage or at the time of award of the construction contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning, that Resolution No. 2013-46, "Approving the Measure `A' Five Year Capital Improvement Plan," is hereby adopted. - PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 23n1 day of April, 2013. ATTEST: Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CO David J. e, City Attorney Aleshire & Wynder, LLP Reso. No. 2013-46 1 Deborah Franklin, Mayor CERTIFICATION: I, Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2013-46 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd of April, 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmembers Botts, Miller, Peterson, Welch, Mayor Franklin NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Reso. No. 201346 v-h4;ad/de-It_ Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk City of Banning, California 2 CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE Of THE CITY CLERK. TITLE g-irY CaNeic DATE EXHIBIT "A" MEASURE "A" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2013/2014-2017/2018 Resolution No. 2013-46 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 — 2017/2018 City of Banning 1 of 5 Arturo Vela (951) 922-3130 April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013/2014 Measure A Allocation: $470,000.00 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013/2014 Projects: $470,000.00 ITEM NO. FY 2013/2014 / PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Hoffer Street: Alessandro Road to Hargrave Street A.C. Overlay 160 160 2. Alessandro Road: Williams Street to Ramsey Street A.C. Overlay 60 60 3. Ramsey Street: Hargrave Street to San Gorgonio Avenue A.C. Overlay 250 250 TOTALS 470 470 Resolution No. 2013-46 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 — 2017/2018 City of Banning 2 of 5 Arturo Vela (951) 922-3130 April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0.00 Estimated FY 2014/2015 Measure A Allocation: $484,000.00 0 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014/2015 Projects: $484,000.00 ITEM NO. FY 2014/2015 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Cherry Street: Hoffer Street to George Street A.C. Overlay 110 110 2. Lincoln Street: San Gorgonio Avenue to Hargrave Street A.C. Overlay 280 280 3. City Wide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal 94 94 TOTALS 484 484 Resolution No. 2013-46 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 — 2017/2018 City of Banning 3 of 5 Arturo Vela (951) 922-3130 April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0.00 Estimated FY 2015/2016 Measure A Allocation: $499,000.00 / Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015/2016 Projects: $499,000.00 ITEM NO. FY 2015/2016 PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUND PROJECT NAME/LIMITS ($1,000) ($1,000) 1. Allen Street: Hoffer Street to George Street A.C. Overlay 90 90 2. Nicolet Street: Sims Street to Sunset Avenue A.C. Overlay 320 320 3. City Wide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal 89 89 TOTALS 499 499 Resolution No. 2013-46 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 — 2017/2018 City of Banning 4of5 Arturo Vela (951) 922-3130 April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0.00 Estimated FY 2016/2017 Measure A Allocation: $514,000.00 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016/2017 Projects: $514,000.00 ITEM NO. FY 2016/2017 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Ramsey Street: San Gorgonio Avenue to 8th Street A.C. Overlay 220 220 2. 8th Street: Lincoln Street to Westward Avenue A.C. Overlay 130 130 3. Charles Street: Hargrave Street to 1037 E. Charles Street A.C. Overlay 82 82 4. Wesley Street: Hargrave Street to 1401 E. Wesley Street A.C. Overlay 82 82 TOTALS 514 514 Resolution No. 2013-46 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 — 2017/2018 City of Banning 5of5 Arturo Vela (951) 922-3130 April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0.00 Estimated FY 2017/2018 Measure A Allocation: $529,000.00 l Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017/2018 Projects: $529,000.00 ITEM NO. FY 2017/2018 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Cottonwood Road: 8th Street to 12th Street Overlay 100 100 2. George Street: 8th Street to 12t` Street Overlay 100 100 3. 10th Street: Williams Street to George Street Overlay 105 105 4. 12th Street: Williams Street to George Street Overlay 114 114 5. 14th Street: Williams Street to George Street Overlay 110 110 TOTALS 529 529 Resolution No. 2013-46 EXHIBIT "B" PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012/2013 Resolution No. 201346 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Banning Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Arturo Vela Phone #: (951) 922-3130 Date: April 23, 2013 Item No.1 Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($1,000's) Measure A Funds ($1,000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 Project No. 2013-01, "Street Improvements on Westward Avenue". The limits are from Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue. ' Street Construction 1,000 454* November, 2013 Design 75% Complete, cdua fy//O G. *Measure A funding for this project included rollover amounts from previous years. The balance will be funded using Proposition 1B funding. Resolution No. 2013-46 EXHIBIT "C" MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION Resolution No. 2013-46 2013-2014 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the CITY OF BANNING (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure "A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $164,325.00, approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2012 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary Local Funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure "A" funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 11-0Z3 , 2013 Andrew J. Takata, City Manager Attest: Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk City of Banning, California Resolution No. 2013-46 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CANYON LAKE FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 May 8, 2013 CITY OF CANYON LAKE 6 L. FP �1I� .. Ay '_, .'ANSPt;MA IM COMMISSION Riverside County Transportation Commission Attention: Shirley Medina 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 RE: Five Year CIP and MOE Certification Statement Dear Ms. Medina: Enclosed are the documents requested. If you haveany questions please give me a call. Sincerely, Richard D. Rowe Interim City Manager 31516 Railroad Canyon Road, Canyon Lake, CA 92587.951/244-2955 • FAX 951/246-2022 adminecityofcanyonlake.com • www.ciryofcanyonlake.com RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone is (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000%) Estimated Completion Status 1 Railroad Canyon Road Widening 9000 979 Early 2013 COMPLETE TOTALS 9,000 979 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0 Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: 148,000.00 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 148,000.00 Item No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 84 49 84 49 1 2 Debt Service for Measure A Loan Debt Service to County TOTALS 133 133 Notes: 1 - Canyon Lake received an advance of $557,000 on Measure A funds for Railroad Canyon Road Widening. This balance is being paid down starting with the 2013-14 allocation. 2 - Canyon lake received a loan from Riverside County in 2003 to pay for 2003 pavement rehabilitation project. The balance of said loan is being paid down starting with 2014-18 allocation. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 15,000.00 152,000.00 167,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ( 00%) 2014-2015 1 Debt Service for Measure A Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 48 48 3 Railroad Canyon Road (City Limits) Pavement rehabilitation and miscellaneous improvements, signal maintenance. 35 35 TOTALS 167 167 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: 157,000.00 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 157,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Debt Service for Measure A Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 53 53 3 Railroad Canyon Road (City Limits) Pavement rehabilitation and miscellaneous improvements, signal maintenance. 20 20 TOTALS 157. 157 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: - Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: 162,000.00 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 162,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Debt Service for Measure A Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 58 58 3 Railroad Canyon Road (City Limits) Pavement rehabilitation and miscellaneous improvements, signal maintenance. 20 20 TOTALS 162 162 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 167,000.00 l Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 167,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Debt Service for Measure A Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 63 63 3 Railroad Canyon Road (City Limits) Pavement rehabilitation and miscellaneous improvements, signal maintenance. 20 20 TOTALS 167 167 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Canyon Lake (the "Agency") that sales tax. transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a .base year amount of:$28,873,. approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 2013 CITY MANAGER (-LtsfiX;PSeteti, Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CATHEDRAL CITY FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS REVENUE PROJECTIONS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION and FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 SUBMITTED TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 44 Cathedral City PROJECT STATUS REPORT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 20, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000'sr Estimated Completion Status Date Plam Crosswalks SR2S Capital 382 0.011 2,013.000 Design Cathedral Canyon Drive Bridge Capital 1,788 0.023 2,016.000 PAGED Travel way ADA Compliance Capital 200 3.401 Ongoing Maintenance: Public Works Street Maintenance Labor Operation/Maintenance 410.00 Ongoing Public Works Street Maintenance Operations Operation/Maintenance 263.00 Ongoing TOTALS 2,370 676.43 'Through April 2013 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 20, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $750 Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: $1,274.00 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: $2,024.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) $1,750 $285 $100 $2,135 Measure A Funds ($000's) $1,769 $32 $87 $1,888 1 2 Public Works Department Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and proposed projects) City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintnance and street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as street design and related engineering activities including maintenance of the traffic signal system. Various traffic/transportation related projects TOTALS Date Palm Crosswalks SR2S Travel way ADA Compliance RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 20, 2013 Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 136.20 1,312.00 // 1,448.20 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 2 Public Works Department Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and proposed projects) City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintnance and street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as street design and related engineering activities including maintenance of the traffic signal system. Various traffic/transportation related projects TOTALS $1,868 $28,000 $29,868 $1,350 $69 $1,419 Ramon Road Bridge Widening 6t£`6$ 61711 00Z`6$ toZ6`6Z$ 000'8Z$ VZ6`6$ S7`d101 spafad pomp.' uogepodsuenionlan snopen .wa;sits leu6!s oglen ay};0 eoueua;u!ew 6u!pnlou! se!;/we 6upeau!6ue pamp.] pue u6!sep leans se Mann se semnpe wawdolanep pue 6u!uueld pa;elai onjan pue uonepodsuen :A6Jeue ILA leans pue eoueunnew ue!paw `6upped 6u!pnlou! suoneiado eoueua;upw ap!nn 40 Z 6 6u!uapM a6ppe peoll uowe)l (spefad pesodad pue 6u!o6u0) s}oafad;uewenadwl le10e0 wewpedaa svoM o!lgnd (s.000$) spun3 y alnseew (s,000$) ;soa le;ol aclAi pafoid s;!wri / aweN;oafad 'oN wa;l OZ'088' l 00' 69£' 6 OZ'6Z :s;oafoid 91.0Z-910Z Ad .io; apmeny y amseaw pa;ewps3 :uoneoopy y aansem 910Z-91.0Z Ad Pa4ew!;s3 :aouele8 y ainsem JeaA J0pd pa;ew!;s3 £60Z `OZ ifen :a;ea 09E0-OLL (09L) # auogd suow!S II!8 Act paaedaad 6 ;o l abed !0 IeJ13aWe0 30 AID :Aoua6y 91.0Z-910z Jew( le0s!d 860Z - 1760Z Ad wVd9Odd SOW& 7V007 d 3W1SV3141 NO/SSIMOO N011b'121OdSNVHI A1Nl100 3O/Sd3Ald 08£` 6$ 08£` 6$ Z86` 4$ Z86` 6$ S1d101 'welsh leu6!s °wail Ni to eoueualu!ew 6u!pnlou! sammoe 6upeau!6ue pawls.' pue u6!sep halls se Mann se sall!ngoe luawdolanap pue 6upueld palela.' ogled pue uogepodsuen :1C6me ly6!l 1.99.11s pue eoueululew ue!pew '6upped 6u!pnlou! suogendo aoueualulew app Ain luewpedad s)poM o!lgnd I. (s.000$) spund y a.Inseaw (s,000$) lsoo lelol WA' loafoid slgurl / eweN loafoid •oN wall OZTZi7' 4 00'Z6E` 6 OZ' 4E :sloafad 140Z-960Z Ad amp/iv d amseavg pamugs3 :uogeaolld d amseavg L60Z-960Z Ad palewgs3 :aouele8 d °inseam! aeaA Jo!id palewgs3 CUM `OZ AWN :lea 09E0-OLL (09L) :# euoyd suow!S II!8 :Aq paaedaid 6 to abed lewei le0 :Aoua6y L60Z-960Z aeaA leash 81.0Z - 140Z old Wb2190dd SONfld 7V307 V 32Il1Sv3kv NOISSIWWOO NOI1VilIOdSNb2I1 A1N11OO 3O1S83A18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 20, 2013 Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $43.20 r Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $1,434.00 l Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $1,477.20 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintnance and street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as street design and related engineering activities including maintenance of the traffic signal system. $2,015 $1,427 TOTALS $2,015 $1,427 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Cathedral City (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $391,688, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: f (2- 3 , 2013 SECRETARY Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CORONA FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 r©-g,F MAY 13 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (951)736-2266 (951) 279-3627 (FAX) Kip.Field@ci.corona.ca.us May 7, 2013 400 SOUTH VICENTIA AVENUE, P.O. BOX 940, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879-0940 CITY HALL - ON LINE ALL THE TIME (http://www.discovercorona.com) Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 SUBJECT: MEASURE A FIVE YEAR PLAN, MOE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT Ms. Trevino: The following documents are enclosed for your review: • Measure A proposed FY 2013/14 through 2017/18 Capital Improvements Plan • Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed certification statement • Program Status Report for current Fiscal Year 2012/13 • Measure A Annual Disbursement Projects received at the City The City's minimum MOE is set at $2,208,20 he , as of June 30, 2013, the City will have spent $4,810,990 from Measure A and _ rom other funds to support Measure A project expenditures. The document supporting the MOE calculations can be found attached, entitled "FY 2012/13 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures." The Measure A proposed FY 2013/14 through 2017/18 Capital Improvement Plan will be presented to our City Council for review at the Budget Workshop scheduled fo and for adoption at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting on June 19, 201 If you have any questions please contact Kim Sitton, Finance Manager at (951) 279-3532. Sincerely, Kip D. Field, P.E. Public Works Director Attachments c: Kim Sitton, Finance Manager Elaine Fleming -Stanford, Principal Accountant Agency: City of Corona Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: May 6, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-14 to 2017-18 Fiscal Year Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2012-13 Continuing Appropriation: MARA Appropriation (Foothill P ct): Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Project: $ 3,832,745 8,378 188 boa j 3,279,000 $ 22,489,933 MEASURE A. FUNDS Item Total Cost FY 12-13 FY 13-14 Estimated Estimated Meas A Measure A . Measure A No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Funds Carryover Funds Approp Available 1 2010/11 Bicycle Transportation Grant (BTA) Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 380 $ - $ - $ - 2 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways 242,378 131,796 - 131,796 3 Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 31,369,600 323,745 - 323,745 4 Citywide GIS Master Plan Building, Facilities an 214,652 41,044 - 41,044 5 Cota Bridge widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways 316,424 50,000 - 50,000 6 Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension Roads, Bridges and Freeways 17,520,612 7,112,983 - 7,112,983 7 Green River Road Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 4,726,195 682,857 - 682,857 8 Local Street Widening, Curb and Gutter Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 660,645 657,392 657,392 9 Magnolia Avenue Beautification Roads, Bridges and Freeways 285,653 273,992 - 273,992 10 Magnolia Neece Traffic Signal Roads, Bridges and Freeways 116,000 116,000 - 116,000 11 Magnolia/1-15 Freeway Corridor Roads, Bridges and Freeways 109,877 101,373. - 101,373 12 Parkridge and Lincoln Improvement Project Roads, Bridges and Freeways 320,600 32,060 - 32,060 13 SB821 Paseo Grande Reads, Bridges and Freeways 115,196 30,437 - 30,437 14 Sixth Street East Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 869,502 124,843 - 124,843 15 Alley Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways - - 100,000 100,000 16 Citywide Benchmark Update Roads, Bridges and Freeways - - 40,000 40,000 17 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways 159,685 100,000 150,000 250,000 18 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 2,954,984 678,588 3,000,000 3,678,588 19 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 50,000 47,211 25,000 72,211 20 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 3,679,364 3,488,253 500,000 3,988,253 21 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 536,232 137,491 300,000 437,491 22 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Cylce 3 Roads, Bridges and Freeways - - 15,877 15,877 23 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Cylce 8 Roads, Bridges and Freeways - - 32,063 32,063 24 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 924,079 924,079 400,000 1,324,079 25 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 684,897 232,504 300,000 532,504 26 Smith Street Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways - - 750,000 750,000 27 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 373,258 91,540 200,000 291,540 28 Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) - 163,464 163,464 Total: $ 66,230,213 $ 15,378,188 $ 5,976,404 $ 21,354,592 Estimated FY 2013-14 Measure A Balance: $ 1,135,341 Agency: City of Corona Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: May 6, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-14 to 2017-18 Fiscal Year 2014-15 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,135,341 / Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: 3,377,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Project: $ 4,512,341 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways 150,000 150,000 2 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 4 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000r 6 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 7 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 8 SR-91 CIP Betterment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 100,000 100,000 9 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 10 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 168,368 168,368 Total: $ 3,768,368 $ 3,243,368 Estimated FY 2014-15 Measure A Balance: $ 1,268,973 Agency: City of Corona Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: May 6, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-14 to 2017-18 Fiscal Year 2015-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,268,973 / Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: 3,478,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Project: $ 4,746,973 ltem No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 150,000 $ 150,000 2 Chase Drive Improvements Phase III Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 4 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 5 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 6 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 7 SR-91 CIP Betterment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 100,000 100,000 8 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 9 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 10 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 11 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 173,419 173,419 Total: $ 4,173,419' $ 3,648,419 Estimated FY 2015-16 Measure A Balance: $ 1,098,554 Agency: City of Corona Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: May 6, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-14 to 2017-18 Fiscal Year 2016-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,098,554 / Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: 3,582,000 !/ Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Project: $ 4,680,554 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost • Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 4 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 6 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 7 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 8 SR-91 CIP Betterment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 100,000 100,000 9 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 10 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 78,622 178,622 Total: $ V 3,728,622 $ 3,203,622 Estimated FY 2016-17 Measure A Balance: $ 1,476,933 Agency: City of Corona Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: May 6, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-14 to 2017-18 Fiscal Year 2017-18 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,476,933 / Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 3,689,000/ Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Project: $ 5,165,933 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure Funds 1 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 4 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 6 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 7 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 8 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 9 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget 183,980 183,980 Total: $ 3,633,980 � 3,108,980 � Estimated FY 2017-18 Measure A Balance: $ 2,056,952 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for The City of Corona (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and base year amount of $2,208,200 approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 5 �� , 2013 iBradly L. obbins, City Manager ATTEST: Chief ► - u ► City Clerk, City of Corona Item No., Project Name and Description 1. 2010/11 Bicycle Transportation Grant (BTA1 Class II bicycle trails at venous locations within the City in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan. 2. Arterial Widening Street widening in various areas throughout the City to complete the full width of street improvements. 3. Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Construct a four lane grade separation at intersection of Auto Center Drive with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe grade crossing. 4. Citywide GIS Master Plan Acquisition of hardware and software, data conversion and applications development to expand the existing Geographic Information System, or GIS, for citywide implementation. 5. Cota Bridge Widening Bridge widening on Cota Street by the Corporation Yard. 6. Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Construction of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant facilities within the public right of way. 7. Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension Design and construction of Foothill Parkway from Skyline Drive to Paseo Grande. 8. Green River Road Improvements Widen Green River road to four lanes between the 91 freeway and Palisades Drive. 9. Local Street Widening, Curb and Gutter Improvements Widening of local streets and installation of curbs, gutters, driveways, and sidewalks. Miscellaneous curb and gutter repair and related work. 10. Magnolia Avenue Beautification This project will enhance the transportation system by providing raised medians, decorative landscaping and irrigation, pedestrian scale trees, decorative hardscape and beautification elements such as themed bus benches. The improvements will result in a more pleasing environment for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Project No. 6288 7081 7115 7103 7112 7079 8604 6197 7352 6241' PROJECT STATUS REPORT - MEASURE A CITY OF CORONA Project Type Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Building, Facilities and Systems Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Total Cost $ 380 242,378 31,369,600 214,652 316,424 159,685. 17,520,612 4,726,195 660,645 285,653 FY 2012.13 Appropriations $ 313 181,746 362,155 42,522 50,000 100,000 7,596,286 800,000 660,645 279,332 ;Estimeted Completion Completed On going:" Anticipated:ConstrudtidriAugust2013 -: ntigipated,COnstrpCtign JUIy 20.1.3` Page 1 Z a6ed 6wo6-ups: as ii 6wd6-up'� , pZ Alnl wlorulsuoo pa;edlogr ZLOZ -1041aldaS r-laiduio�3'Y uio6=upk . • uop'aidwoo polelupsa 6L0'PZ6 6L0'PZ6 P6L'Z9 961.'91.1 £L9'L£L Z£Z'9£9 £ZO'LOg'£ P9E'6L9'£ 000'09 000'09 090'Z£ 009'0Z£ ZZL'ZOL'Z P86'496'3 000'914 LLe'601 suopeudoiddy £c-Z;oZ Ad 000'9LL LLB'60 L isoa islet sAemaai j pue sa6pu8 'speoa sAemaaJj pue sa6pu8 'speoa sAemaaJ j pue sa6pu8 'speoa sAemaaid pue sa6pu8 'speoa shmaau pue se6pu8 'speoa sAemaalj pue sa6pue 'speoa sAemaaJd pue sa6pu8 'speoa sAemeei j pue sa6pu8 'speoa sAemaaa j pue sa6pu8 'speoa adk loeford LZ08 ZOL9 ZZ69 ZZ69 690L Pg89 080L Lb89 960L 'ON laafoid VN0d00 do ADO V 3ansd3W - id0d321 snlyls 133rOdd 1110M leluaploul pue '6uueaul6ua '6ulurud lea 'wed amlq ssaooe 'iaAn6 'curio Aemapp 6ulsslw;o uollellelsul 'sayoeadde anup pue 'Hlemapls 'iapn6 'gmo;o luawaoeldai Jo iledaa wawaoeloawuollellelsul Jauno pue 'curia meMaplS '61 •apueio eased 6uole uollellelsul Hlemapls a pongsuoo pue Asap apueap oased LZ98S '91 'Nels Ale yllm samllel luawaned snoeuellaoslw pue saloylod pue aoeunsaa aoueualulew luawaned pue ouloei.rnsea 'L 'op 'Aunts 'Bums >pen %wed uononulsuooas apnloul Aew uollellllgeueN •Apnls luawa6euew luawaned ;ileum ayl yllm aouepu000e ul spans leool Jo; uolleilllgeyai luawaned slams pool Jo; uollemeyaa luawaned '91 •sloalad uogewmeyai Jo; Apnis;o alepdn pue koluanul;awls au; alaldwoa of ienedoiong olul uolsnloul Jo; slaaJls pool Jo Aanuns plaid A nis wawaneueyy luawaned '91 •anuany ulooul l pue a6pLoued;o uolloasJawl aL4le leu6ls o eel a;o uollellelsul loalom luawenoadwl uloeuli pue euplived '41 wei6ad luawa6euen luawaned ayl, yllm aouepi000e ul wails snouen Jo uollelmeyai luawaned uollellll4e4ea luawaned JOON '£L Aunoo ayl AO Pa6euew aq 111m loalad ayl 'aoaaN pue ellou6e0;;0 uogoasJalul ayl le palorulsuoo aq of leu6ls owed a paleu6pap say Awno° ayl IBMS *Dell eoeaN epouueig 'Z 1 •sdwei Aemaaij gL-1 wog uaamlaq elpu6eyy 6uluaplm pue dwer uo ayl;o 6uluapin+ 'punogyuou dwea •moll owes; anoidwl of a6ueyaalul Aemaai j g 1-wanuany eyou6e0J ay; of sluawanoidwl Jopp.m3 neMeai j g vuepounegg ' 11 uouduasea pue eweN peekud ''oN wall PROJECT STATUS REPORT - MEASURE A CITY OF CORONA item No., Project Name and Description 20. Sidewalk. Curb. and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approaches. Installation of missing sidewalk, curb, gutter, access ramps, bike paths, root pruning, engineering, and Incidental work. 21. Sixth Street East Improvements Design and construct landscape median on East Sixth Street from El Sobrante Road to the easterly city limits. Improve the East Sixth Street / El Camino intersection to ultimate improvements and Install traffic signal. 22. Striping Rehabilitation ,Upgrade and maintenance of striping citywide by City forces or annual contract. 23 Cost AIIopation Plan (Overhead) TOTAL Project No. 7073 7107 7292 Operational Project Type Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Total Cost 684,897 869,502 373,258 $ 66,230,213 FY 2012-13 Appropriations Estimate¢, - Campletlori ; 240,896 155,682 100,000 31,918 $ 17,643,723 yl, Page 3 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 City of Desert Hot Springs 65-950 Pierson Blvd. • Desert Hot Springs • CA • 92240 (760) 329-6411 www.cityofdhs.org May 30, 2013 Shirley Medina Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 RE: City of Desert Hot Spring Measure "A" five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2013-2018 REVISED Dear Ms Medina, Attached is the City of Desert Hot Springs' Revised Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2013-2018 and a Project Status Report for our FY 2012/13 plan projects. We have revised our previous submittals to reflect some carryover amounts from the previous Fiscal Year and the actual amount of our annual debt service for the City's Certificates of Participation (COPs). Funds generated from the COPS is used exclusively for street and road improvements We also increased the amount of Measure A funds used for debt service on the COPs beginning in FY 2013/14 from 100,000 to $200,000. . If you have an questions, or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (7600 329-6411 Ext. 216 Sincerely, Hal Goldenberg Public Works Director Attachments Copy: Finance Department Engineering RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Revised 5-30-13 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 6 of 6 Prepared by: Hal Goldenberg Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: May30, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ( 00%) Measure A Funds (WO's) Estimated Completion Status 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Slurry Sealing Maintenance 3,432 948 12/4/2012 Complete 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Debt Service 398 100 8/1/2013 Complete Improvement Program) Service 2012A COP% (Certificate of Participation) TOTALS 3,830 1,048 A-, RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Revised 5-30-13 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 1 of 6 Prepared by: Hal Goldenberg Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: May 30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 ✓" Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: 437,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 437000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Slurry Sealing Maintenance 650 237 2013-2014 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Debt Service 401 200 Improvement Program) Service 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) TOTALS 1,051 437 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Revised 5-30-13 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 2 of 6 Prepared by: Hal Goldenberg Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: May 30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: 450,00V Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 450,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Slurry Sealing Maintenance 600 250 2014-2015 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Debt Service 399 200 Improvement Program) Service 2012A COP% (Certificate of Participation) TOTALS 999 450 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Revised 5-30-13 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 3 of 6 Prepared by: Hal Goldenberg Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: May30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: 464,000 V Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 464,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Slung Sealing Maintenance 750 264 2015-2016 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Debt Service 401 200 Improvement Program) Service 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) TOTALS 1,151 464 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Revised 5-30-13 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 4 of 6 Prepared by: Hal Goldenberg Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: May30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016.2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 0 478,000 478000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Slurry Sealing Maintenance 850 278 2016-2017 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Debt Service 398 200 Improvement Program) Service 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) TOTALS 1,248 478 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 2018 Revised 5-30-13 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 5 of 6 Prepared by: Hai Goldenberg Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: May30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 492,000 J Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 492000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Slurry Sealing Maintenance 1050 292 2017-2018 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Debt Service 399 200 Improvement Program) Service 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) TOTALS 1,449 492 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Desert Hot Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $75,147, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 5 G / , 2013 CI Y MANAGER ATTEST: Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF INDIAN WELLS FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 4ry a IND1ANV WELLS CALI FORNIA April 26,.2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Officer 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 jj) r_ .11 \1 I MAY 0 F., 201.3 LI RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Re: Measure "A": Local Streets and Roads five-year Capital Improvement Plan and Status Update Dear Ms. Medina: Attached is the City of Indian Wells Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2013/14-2017/18. . Following is the status of the City project listed on the FY 2012-13 five-year plan: aid= Status Citywide Parkways Ongoing cc: Finance Director Sincerely, rag ($000's) $585 Measure "A" ($000's) $211 K.H. Bell, P.E. Interim Public Works Director RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM • - FY 2014' - 2018 : Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: K.H. BELL, INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 26, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 100 Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocadon: 231 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 331 Item No: Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (3000's) Measure A Funds ($00016) 2013-2014 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Slurry Seal on Local Streets Street Improvement 250 0 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 331 TOTALS 860 331 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: K.H. BELL, INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 26, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 0 238 / 238 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Slurry Seal on Miles Avenue Street Improvement 400 0 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 238 TOTALS 1,010 238 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: K.H. BELL, INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 26, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 0 245 245 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project ape Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Street Grind Overlay Street Improvement 1,000 0 3 Street Grind Overlay on Cook Steet /Eldorado Drive/Rancho Palmeras Street Improvement 500 0 4 Slurry Seal on Local Streets Street Improvement 250 0 5 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 245 TOTALS 2,360 245 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: K.H. BELL, INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 26, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 0 252 252 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Slurry Seal on Hwy 111 Street Improvement 100 0 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 252 TOTALS 710 252 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: K.H. Bell, Interim Public Works Director Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: April 26, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 0 260 / 260 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 260 TOTALS 610 260 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Indian Wells (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $963,640, / approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation. purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County. Transportation Commission. Dated: - 7 2 , 2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF INDIO FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 May 7, 2013. Ms, Shirley Medina Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3r`I Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Five Year IVleas.ure A Capital Improvement Plan (FY2013 — 2018) Dear Ms. Medina: Enclosed is the City of Indio's submittal of the Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2013-2019 to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for review and approval. The City's Maintenance of Effort certification is also enclosed, as well as a status report for projects utilizing Measure A funds in Fiscal Year 2012-2013. if you have any questions, please call me at (760) 391-4017. Sincerely, Grant D. EklunP.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer cc: Tom Rafferty; P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Brian Kinder, Accountant la: 760.391.4000 f; 760.391.4008 100 Civic Center Mail Indio, CA 92201 • www:INDiaorg RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Indio Page No.: 1 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 0 1515 1515 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 1) Jefferson Street and Varner Road Design & Construction $ 4,850 $ 650 Improvements 2) Highway 111 Street Improvements Design & Construction $ 300 $ 152 3) Shields Road Connection Design & Construction $ 40 40 4) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment $ 673 673 TOTALS 5,863 1,515 Agency: Page No.: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 City of Indio 2of6 Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer 760-391-4017 May 7, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 0 1560 1560 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1) Madison Street Improvements Design & Construction $ 12,000 $ 887 (Avenue 49 to Avenue 52) Measure A Advance Debt $ 673 673 2) Repayment Payment TOTALS 12,673 1,560 Agency: Page No.: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 City of Indio 3 of 6 Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer 760-391-4017 May 7, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 0 1607 1607 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost { ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1) Design & Construction $ 900 $ 300 Pavement Rehabilitation Madison Street Improvements (Avenue 49 to Design & Construction $ 3,000 $ 634 2) Highway 111) 3) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment $ 673 673 TOTALS 4,573 1,607 999' 1 E89'Z S7b101 }uawAeda){ ma aouenpy y amsem 6uivapiM 0g anuany (Z (1. EL9 Z86 $ EL9 $ 01.0'Z $ tuawAed uonorwsuoa ig u6pea L10Z-910Z (s.000$) spund y alnsem (s,000$) ;so° ie;ol adAi pafoad swan / mum pafad •oN well 9991. 9991. 0 :s;oafoud 11.0Z-91.0Z Jld Jo; avgeneny V amseaW pa;ewps3 :uoge3011d y amseew L1.0Z-910Z Jld pa;ewns3 muelea y 0.111seaW .10Pd pa;eums3 £ 1.0Z 'L �eW L 1. Otr 1.6E-09L Jeaui6u3 !No ledpupd "ad 'Apa}}ea wol g;o y mu!;o Alo 8LOZ - tiiOZ Ad WVd9Odd SaNnd 7V301 V 32Il1SV3IN NOISSIWWOO NOIlb'12►OdSNVUI A1Nl1OO acusuanw :a;ea :# amid paiedaid :•oN e6ed :Aoue6d RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Indio Page No.: 5 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 0 1705 1705 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1) Design & Construction $ 2,147 $ 1,032 Avenue 50 Widening Measure A Advance Debt $ 673 673 2) Repayment Payment TOTALS 2,820 1,705 Agency: Page No.: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 City of Indio 6 of 6 Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer 760-391-4017 May 7, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1) Pavement Rehabilitation - Monroe Street (Avenue 49 to Avenue 52) Design & Construction $ 3,000 $ 574 April, 2013 Completed. Completed - Used 2) Miles Avenue Bridge Payent $ 300 $ - n/a different funding sources. 4) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment $ 673 $ 673 Completed Completed TOTALS 3,973 1,247 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Indio (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds. received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,048,564, approved by: the Commission at its July 11, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure.A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending MeasureA Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Com.mission. Dated: May 9, 2013 CITY MANAGER -Dan Martine ATTEST: RETARY-Cynthia Hernand Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF LA QUINTA FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION r 7,3 z. - S - V �OFTHE May 8, 2013 Tuff ot sePailiffai P.O. Box 1504 1.A QUINT.A, CALIFORNIA 92247-1504 78-495 CAI.LE T.AMPICO LA QUIVTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Shirley Medina Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 -01E©-ROVEM I\\ MAY 09 2013 1-j TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Subject: City of La Quinta Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification Dear Ms. Medina, The City of La Quinta respectfully submits its Measure A Capital Improvement Plan, Project Status Report and Maintenance of Effort Certification for the Commission's review and approval. The City of La Quinta is a full participant in the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Programs. Please do not hesitate to contact Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer, at (760) 777-7042 or Nick Nickerson, Project Manager, at (760) 323-5344 if you have questions or require additional information. Enclosures RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: MAY 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 804 ' Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 1 Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street Improvement 235 235 2 Dune Palms Road Street Improvements (Black Hawk Way and Whitewater Channel) Street Improvement 1,612 308 3 Adams Street Signal and Street Improvements Street Improvement ' 721 261 (Highway 111 to Whitewter Channel) TOTALS 2,56t3 804 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: MAY 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 713.765 (0) 714 ✓ Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street Improvement 235 235 Dune Palms Road Street 2 Improvements (Black Hawk Way and Whitewater Channel) Street Improvement 1,612 479 TOTALS 1,847/ 714 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: MAY 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 734.765 735 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 • Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street Improvement 235 235 Dune Palms Road Street 2 Improvements (Black Hawk Way and Whitewater Channel) Street Improvement 1,612 500 TOTALS 1,847 7361 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: MAY 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: (0) y 757 757 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street Improvement 235 235 Dune Palms Road Street 2 Improvements (Black Hawk Way and Whitewater Channel) Street Improvement 1,612 325 3 Jefferson Street Interchange at 1-10 Regional Improvement 5,125 197 TOTALS 6,972 757 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: MAY 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: (0) 780 780 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street Improvement 235 235 2 Jefferson Street Interchange at 1-10 Regional Improvement 5,125 545 TOTALS 5,360 780 **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Phone #: (760) 777-7045 Date: MAY /3, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ( 00%) Estimated Completion Status TOTALS 0 0 Note: FY 2013/2014 was the first fiscal year the City of La Quinta received Local Measu e A Funding. No prior status is reportable. c&tifateepadia P.O. B.Ox 1504 1.AeUINTA, �ALIFORNTA`9�1247-1'SU4 " 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO L A lliNTA; C11LiF:CSR:N:IA 922'5 ' (760) 777-7000 ... FAX (-76V),`777-7101 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of La Quinta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $937,007, approved by the Commission at its June 12, 2013 meeting, and that ; the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 28, 2013 .,f11,y ar;OCOUNTY N COMMISSION J ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, Cry Clerk CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 CITY OF 1.,141U a LSINOn ` DREAM EXTREME n f .;.: May 30, 2013 Grace Alvarez, Sr. Staff Analyst Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 SUBJECT: MEASURE A FIVE YEAR PLAN, MOE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT Ms. Alvarez: The following documents are enclosed for your review: • Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed certification statement • Measure -A proposed FY 2013/14 through 2017/18 Capital Improvements Plan • Program Status Reports The Measure A proposed FY 2013/14 through 201.7/18 Capital Improvement :Plan was presented to our City Council for review at the Budget Workshop held on May30, 2013; and for adoption at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting on June 25, 2013. If you have any questions please contact Ken Seumalo, Director of Public Works at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 244. Sincerely, X ti—oe Ken Seumalo Director of Public Works 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W WW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Nicole McCalmont Phone #: 951-674-3124 Ext. 245 Date: June 5, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 2013 Annual curb, gutter, sidewalk repair program Maintenance $130 $130 Completed Completed 2 2013 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance $160 $160 Completed Completed 3 2013 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $80 $80 Completed Completed 4 2013 Roadway Drainage Projects Construction $100 $100 On -going 75% Complete 5 2013 Annual Slurry Seal Program Maintenance $160 $160 On -going 10% Complete 6 2013 Annual Asphalt Maintenance Program Maintenance $200 $200 Completed Completed 7 Survey Monument Construction $35 $35 On -going 80% Complete TOTALS $865 $865 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 14-18 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 of 5 Prepared By: Nicole McCalmont Phone No.: (951) 674-3124 Ext. 245 Date: May 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: $61,186 $993,000 $1,054,186 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY 13/14 1 Annual Asphalt Maintenance Maintenance $240,000 $240,000 2 Annual Concrete Maintenance Prgm Maintenance $170,000 $170,000 3 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 4 Survey Monument Maintenance $35,000 $35,000 5 Annual Slurry Seal Program Maintenance $200,000 $200,000 6 Roadway Drainage/Maintenance Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 7 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $80,000 $80,000 8 Traffic Signal Canyon Hills/Sage Construction $49,011 $49,011 TOTALS $974,011 $974,011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 14-18 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 of 5 Prepared By: Nicole McCalmont Phone No.: (951) 674-3124 Ext. 245 Date: May 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $80,175 $1,023,000 $1,103,175 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY14/15 1 Annual Asphalt Maintenance Maintenance $240,000 $240,000 2 Annual Concrete Maintenance Prgm Maintenance $170,000 $170,000 3 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 4 Survey Monument Ongoing $35,000 $35,000 5 Annual Slurry Seal Program Maintenance $220,000 $220,000 6 Roadway Drainage/Maintenance Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 7 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $80,000 $80,000 8 Canyon Hills/Angel Falls Signal Construction $75,000 $75,000 TOTALS $1,020,000 $1,020,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 14-18 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 of 5 Prepared By: Nicole McCalmont Phone No.: (951) 674-3124 Ext. 245 Date: May 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $83,175 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $1,054,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $1,137,175 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY 15/16 1 Annual Asphalt Maintenance Maintenance $260,000 $260,000 2 Annual Concrete Maintenance Prgm Maintenance $210,000 $210,000 3 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 4 Survey Monument Ongoing $35,000 $35,000 5 Annual Slurry Seal Program Maintenance $250,000 $250,000 6 Roadway Drainage/Maintenance Maintenance $120,000 $120,000 7 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $80,000 $80,000 TOTALS $1,055,000 $1,055,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 14-18 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 of 5 Prepared By: Nicole McCalmont Phone No.: (951) 674-3124 Ext. 245 Date: May 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $82,175. $1,086,000 $1,168,175 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY 16/17 1 Annual Asphalt Maintenance Maintenance $260,000 $260,000 2 Annual Concrete Maintenance Prgm Maintenance $240,000 $240,000 3 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 4 Survey Monument Ongoing $35,000 $35,000 5 Annual Slurry Seal Program Maintenance $250,000 $250,000 6 Roadway Drainage/Maintenance Maintenance $120,000 $120,000 7 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $80,000 $80,000 8 TOTALS $1,085,000 $1,085,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 14-18 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 of 5 Prepared By: Nicole McCalmont Phone No.: (951) 674-3124 Ext. 245 Date: May 13, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $83,175 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A. Allocation: $1,119,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $1,202,175 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY 17/18 1 Annual Asphalt Maintenance Maintenance $260,000 $260,000 2 Annual Concrete Maintenance Prgm Maintenance $270,000 $270,000 3 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 4 Survey Monument Ongoing $35,000 $35,000 5 Annual Slurry Seal Program Maintenance $250,000 $250,000 6 Roadway Drainage/Maintenance Maintenance $120,000 $120,000 7 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $80,000 $80,000 TOTALS $1,115,000 $1,115,000 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS REVENUE MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Lake Elsinore (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $960,771, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dates: May c ,2013 Grant M. Yat ;s%ty Manager Attest: Nf LaAccounting S ervisor Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF MORENO VALLEY FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 951.413.3130 .: 951.413.3170 WWW.MOVAL.ORG May 6, 2013 MORENO VALLEY WHERE DREAMS S O A R Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92502 14177 FREDERICK STREET P.O. BOX 88005 MORENO VALLEY, CA 92552-0805 'MAY 0 . RIVERSIDE COUNTY RANSPORTA IM COMMISSION Subject: Fiscal Year 2014-2018 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement Dear Ms. Medina: The City of Moreno Valley is pleased to submit its Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-2018 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City Council reviewed and approved the Five -Year Measure A Local Streets and Roads CIP and Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement on April 23, 2013. For questions regarding the Measure A CIP please contact Linda Wilson, Senior Management Analyst, at (951) 413-3132 or by email at lindawi@movaLorg. Sincerely, Linda Wilson Senior Management Analyst Enclosures: MOE Certification Statement Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2012-2013 Project Status Report Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2014-2018 c: File Prem Kumar, Deputy Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer Rick Teichert, Financial and Administrative Services Director CAPITAL PROJECTS Attachment 1 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Moreno Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,459,153, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: , 2013 NRY GACIA, CITY A AGER ATTEST: C� 1� C RK RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Linda wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 9,661,000 3,136,000 12,797,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 449 449 2 Citywide Sign/Striping Operating Budget 200 200 3 Street Maintenance Vehicle/Equipment Program Street Vehicles 710 710 4 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead 251 251 5 Corporate Yard Loan Repayment Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements 2,500 2,500 6 MVU Substation Loan Repayment Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements 150 150 7 Alessandro Boulevard/Elsworth Street Intersection Improvements Street Improvements 841 85 8 Alessandro Boulevard Median/Indian Street to Perris Boulevard Street Improvements 846 209 9 Alessandro Boulevard Pavement Modifications Street Improvements 70 70 10 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramps Street Improvements 200 200 11 Bike Lane Improvements Street Improvements 24 24 12 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Bridge 10 10 13 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program Street Improvements 5,177 1,093 ATTACHMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Linda wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 23, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 14 Citywide Traffic Sign Retro-reflectivity Inventory Traffic Signal 69 69 15 Delphinium Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Street Improvements 463 46 16 Heacock Street South Extension Street Improvements 325 325 17 Indian Street/ Manzanita Avenue Intersection Reconfiguration Street Improvements 124 124 18 Moreno Valley Bicycle Master Plan Street Improvements 145 14 19 Nason Street/Cactus Avenue Street Improvements Street Improvements 1,476 1,317 20 Pavement Management Program Street Improvements 35 35 21 Pavement Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Program Resurface 293 293 22 Reche Vista Dr. Realignment/Perris Blvd./Heacock St. to North City Limits Street Improvements 4 4 23 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Street Improvements 56 56 24 SR-60/Nason St. Interchange Street Improvements 3 1 25 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street & Storm Drain Improvements 1,800 721 26 Sunnymead Boulevard/SR-60 EB On- Ramp Intersection Improvements Street Improvements 459 25 TOTALS 16,680 8,981 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Linda wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 3,816,000 3,230,000 7,046,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 449 449 2 Citywide Sign/Striping Operating Budget 200 200 3 Street Maintenance Vehicle/Equipment Program Street Vehicles 200 200 4 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead 258 258 5 Operating transfer to pay COPs debt service. Debt Service 1,322 1,322 6 Library DIF Loan Repayment Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements 750 750 7 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Street Improvement 200 200 8 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Maintenance Program 10 10 9 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvement 1,100 1,100 10 Pavement Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Program Street Improvement 60 60 11 Residential Traffic Management Program Speed Hump Program 50 50 12 Street Improvement Program Street Improvement 200 200 TOTALS 4,799 4,799 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Linda wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 2,247,000 3,327,000 5,574,000 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type i otai cost ($000's) measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 449 449 2 Citywide Sign/Striping Operating Budget 200 200 3 Street Maintenance Vehicle/Equipment Program Street Vehicles 38 38 4 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead 266 266 5 Operating transfer to pay COPs debt service. Debt Service 1,322 1,322 6 Operating Transfer to pay 2005 Lease Revenue Bond Debt Service Debt Service 1,117 1,117 7 Library DIF Loan Repayment Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements 750 750 8 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Street Improvement 200 200 9 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Maintenance Program 10 10 10 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvement 600 600 11 Pavement Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Program Street Improvement 60 60 12 Residential Traffic Management Program Speed Hump Program 50 50 13 Street Improvement Program Street Improvement 200 200 TOTALS 5,262 5,262 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Linda wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 312,000 3,427,000 3,739,000 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type iota! cost ($000's) measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 400 400 2 Citywide Sign/Striping Operating Budget 150 150 3 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead 0 0 4 Operating transfer to pay COPs debt service. Debt Service 1,322 1,322 5 Operating Transfer to pay 2005 Lease Revenue Bond Debt Service Debt Service 1,117 1,117 6 Library DIF Loan Repayment Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements 750 750 7 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Street Improvement 0 0 8 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Maintenance Program 0 0 9 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvement 0 0 10 Pavement Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Program Street Improvement 0 0 11 Residential Traffic Management Program Speed Hump Program 0 0 12 Street Improvement Program Street Improvement 0 0 TOTALS 3,739 3,739 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Linda wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 23, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 3,530,000 3,530,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 100 100 2 Citywide Sign/Striping Operating Budget 100 100 3 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead 0 0 4 Operating transfer to pay COPs debt service. Debt Service 1,322 1,322 5 Operating Transfer to pay 2005 Lease Revenue Bond Debt Service Debt Service 1,117 1,117 6 Library DIF Loan Repayment Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements 750 750 7 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Street Improvement 0 0 8 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Maintenance Program 0 0 9 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvement 100 100 10 Pavement Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Program Street Improvement 41 41 11 Residential Traffic Management Program Speed Hump Program 0 0 12 Street Improvement Program Street Improvement 0 0 TOTALS 3,530 3,530 Riverside County Transportation Commision Measure A Local Funds Program / Project Status Report FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 2 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Date: April 23, 2013 2012 2013 Item No. Project Type/ Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status Project Name [Limits, 1 Measure Program Budget Program Budget 449 449 NA On -going program 2 Overhead 242 242 NA On -going Indirect Cost Rate 3 Alessandro Boulevard/ Elsworth Street Intersection Improvements Street Improvements 845 / 85- Sep-16 Design in progress 4 Alessandro Boulevard Median/Indian Street to Perris Boulevard Street Improvements 959 59 Apr-14 Design in progress 4 Alessandro. Boulevard Pavement Modification Street Improvements 72 / 72 - Mar-14 Design in progress 5 Bike Lane Improvements Street Improvements 84 / ✓ 84 Jun-14 On -going 6 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program Street Improvements 1,713 "re 978. NA On -going annual program 7 . Citywide Traffic Sign Retro-reflectivity Inventory Traffic Signal 70 70- Dec-13 Inventory on -going . 8 Delphinium Avenjue Sidewalk Improvements Street Improvements 463 746 Dec-14 New - design to begin in June 2013 9 Heacock St. Bridge/Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral "A" Bridge 1,495 / 158- Oct-12 Project Closeout completed 10 Heacock Street Sidewalk/Atwood Avenue to Myers Avenue Street Improvements 81 / 81 Jun-12 Project Closeout completed 11 Heacock Street South Extension Street Improvements. 525 �525 Jun-18 35% design; environmental 12Improvements Indian Street/Alessandro Boulevard Sidewalk Street Improvements 2 / 2 Feb-12 Project Closeout completed 13 Indian Street / Manzanita Avenue Intersection Reconfiguration Street Improvements 101 / 101 Jan-14 Design in progress 14 Indian Street Bicycle Lanes / Iris Avenue to Katrina Street Street Improvements 2 A •Jun-12 Project Closeout completed 15 Moreno Valley Bicycle Master Plan Update Street Improvements 150 /14 Jun-14 Inventory on -going 16 Nason Street/Cactus Avenue Street Improvements Street Improvements 21,932 ,V.Construction 2,317 ' Oct-13 on -going . 17 Pavement Management Program Street Improvements 85 ✓85 • NA On -going annual program 18 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (formerly Slurry Seal Program) Resurface 284 "--284 NA On -going annual program 19 Perris Blvd SB Lane to SR-60 WB On -Ramp Street Improvements 146 / 146 Aug-12 Project Closeout completed 20 Reche Vista Dr. Realignment/Perris Blvd./Heacock St. to North City Limits Street Improvements 6 6 Jun-18 Research construction 21 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Street Improvements 85 ✓ 85 NA On -going annual program ATTACHMENT 2 Riverside County Transportation Commision Measure A Local Funds Program Amended Project Status Report FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 2 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Date: April 23, 2013 2012-2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 22 SR-60/Nason St. Interchange Street Improvements 973 ✓ 211 Jun-12 Project closeout and audit 23 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street & Storm Drain Impry 2,120 ✓891 NA On -going annual program 24 Sunnymead Boulevard / SR-6-0 On -Ramp Intersection Improvements Street Improvements 459 ✓ 25 Jun-16 Design Jan 2014- June 2015 Totals 33,343 7,018 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PALM DESERT FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 CIIY Of NIA DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346-061 i info@cicyofpalmdesert.org May 10, 2013 Shirley Medina Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, Califomia 92502-2208 Subject: Measure A Capital Improvement Program Dear Shirley, MAY 13 2013 TRANSPORTATIONCOMMISSION Enclosed for Commission consideration is the City of Palm Desert's proposed 2013/2014 — 2017/2018 Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program, as well as the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement and calculation documentation. The Five -Year Program will be reviewed in the near future by our City Council. If the City Council makes any changes to the program, a revised version will be submitted to you for approval. If no changes are made, please treat this as the official submittal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (760) 346-0611, ext 469. Sincerely, Merk eenw, P.E. Dire of Public Works Enclosure cc: John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance �V PNIRIIU D.Ecrn IP PAPFP CITY Of PEM OESEPT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL:76o 346—o6Li i nfoOki cgofpamdesert.org May 10, 2013 Shirley Medina Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, Califomia 92502-2208 Subject: Project Status Report — Measure "A" Projects Prior Year Plan - Fiscal Year Ending (FYE) June 30, 2013 Dear Shirley, At the beginning of the 12/13 Fiscal Year, the City of Palm Desert had eight projects with Measure "A" funding. Of these eight projects, one has been completed and seven are being carried over to FY 13/14. The status of those eight projects is as follows: 1. Portola Interchange @ 1-10 This project is in the environmental and preliminary engineering phase. NCR has been conditionally approved by FHWA. We are in the process of updating the environmental documents. We anticipate approval in the spring of 2014. This project is currently un-funded; however we are carrying over $133,347 of Measure A funds for ongoing obligations. 2. Monterey Avenue / 1-10 Intersection Improvements Environmental document approved by CalTrans. RFA for construction submitted to CalTrans March 31, 2013. ROW has been certified. Anticipate construction late fall 2013. Measure A funds in the amount of $8,689,670 are being carried over to FY 13/14. 3. Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Drive to Country Club Drive We are currently developing conceptual alignment plans for this project. Most of the west side of the project is within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Mirage. We continue to work closely with them. $4,500,000 of Measure A funds are being carried over to FY 13/14. 4. Fred Waring Drive Right Tum Pocket at Hwy. 111 The design for this project is 90% complete, and we are currently in the process of acquiring ROW. Measure A funds of $665,226 are being carried over to FY 13/14. +CI .F:rpe sw er:al:o r.rix Project Status Report May 10, 2013 Page 2of2 5. Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue Improvements Contract was awarded May 9, 2013. Construction anticipated to begin June 1, 2013. Measure A funds in the amount of $2,912,994 is being carried over to FY 13/14. 6. Street Resurfacing Contract has been awarded. Construction is scheduled to begin July 8, 2013. Measure A funding in the amount of $2,301,441 are being carried over to FY 13/14. 7. Bridge Inspection Program This project is in design and Measure A funds in the amount of $100,000 are being carried over to FY 13/14. Completed: 8. Date Palm Drive / 110 Interchange Funding participation is complete. Enclosed is the City of Palm Desert's Measure A Local Funds Program Project Status Report FY 2013 - 2014. The amounts in the "Measure A Funds" column are as of April 30, 2013 balances. If you have any questions, please feel free me. I can be reached at (760) 346-0611, extension 469. Sincerely, Mark nwood, Direc r f Public Wo Enclosure cc: John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance CITY Of MID DESERT 011740 0.1104101Y0 Rt1hthWnr4s:Rertho (:nmmle IL.AortMeTriRPTP 1 i_14,1 n Pm'vn G.nw Rm.II. ocx RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page: 1 of 1 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-776-6469 Date: May 10, 2013 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) ESTIMATED COMPLETION STATUS 1 L------ Portola Interchange @ I-10 On-ramp/Off-ramp construction 71,993 134 September 2018 In Environmental and preliminary engineering phase. NCR conditionally approved by FHWA. Updating envirommntal documents; ancipate approval in spring of 2014. 2 Monterey Avenue / 110 Interchange Improvements ✓ On-ramp/Off-ramp construction 12,699 329 April 2014 RFA for construction submitted to CalTrans. Anticipate construction late fall 2013. 3 Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Drive to Country Club Drive Roadway Widening 6,500 4,500 June 2016 Developing conceptual alignment plans. 4 Fred Waring Drive Right Turn Pocket Hwy. 111 Street Project 775 23 July 2013 Design 90% complete. Acquiring ROW. 5 Fred Waring Drive 8 Monterey Ave. Turn Pockets r/ Street Project 3,123 2,913 August 2013 Contract awarded. Construction to begin June 1, 2013. 6 Street Resurfacing Maintenance ,_.----- Maintenance Project 4,000 2,233 June 2014 Contract awarded. Construction to begin July 8, 2013. 7 Bridge Inspection Program ✓ Maintenance Project 100 100 June 2014 In design. 8 Date Palm Drive / 1-10 Interchange On-ramp/Off-ramp construction 83 83 September 2012 Complete TOTALS 99,273 10,315 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 City of Palm Desert 1 of 5 Mark Greenwood 760-776-6469 May 10, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 22,800,578 J 2,478,000 25,278,578 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 2013-2014 Portola Interchange @ I-10 1 Estimated Carryover FY 12/13 $134, estimated carryover is only Measure A funding, other funding for project is being carryover On-ramp/Off-ramp construction 72,000 134 Monterey Avenue / 110 Interchange 2 Improvements Estimated Carryover FY 12/13 $329, estimated carryover is only Measure A funding, other funding for project is being carryover On-ramp/Off-ramp construction 12,699 329 Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring 3 Drive to Country Club Drive Estimated Carryover FY 12/13 $4,500, estimated carryover is only Measure A funding Roadway Widening 6,500 4,500 Fred Waring Drive Right Turn Pocket at Hwy. 111 4 Estimated Carryover FY 12/13 $23, estimated carryover is only Measure A funding, other funding for project is being carryover Street Project 775 23 Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue Improvements 5 Estimated Carryover FY 12/13 $2,913, estimated carryover is only Measure A funding, other funding for project is being carryover Street Project 3,123 2,913 Street Resurfacing Maintenance 6 Estimated Carryover FY 12/13 $2,233, estimated carryover is only Measure A funding, other funding for project is being carryover Maintenance Project 3,500 4,233 FY 13/14 request $2,000 Bridge Inspection Program 7 Estimated Carryover FY 12/13 $100 Maintenance Project 100 200 FY 13/14 request $100 8 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications FY 13/14 request $50 Maintenance Project 100 50 9 LED Indication Replacement Program FY 13/14 request $50 Maintenance Project 53 50 TOTAL 98,850 12,432 FY 13-14 YR 1 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 City of Palm Desert 2of5 Mark Greenwood 760-776-6469 May 10, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 12,847,500 / 2,552,000 15,399,500 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Maintenance Project 3,500 1,900 2 Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Drive to Country Club Drive Roadway Widening 6,500 2,000 3 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100 100 4 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 100 50 TOTAL 10,200 4,050 FY 14-15 YR 2 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 City of Palm Desert 3 of 5 Mark Greenwood 760-776-6469 May 10, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 11,349,500 / 2,629,000 13,978,500 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST (5000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Maintenance Project 3,500 1,900 2 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100 100 3 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 100 50 TOTAL 3,700 2,050 FY 15-16 YR 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page: 4 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-776-6469 Date: May 10, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 11,928,500 2,708,000 14,636,500 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Maintenance Project 3,500 1,900 2 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100 100 3 Cook Street Widening - Phase II Roadway Widening 6,100 3,656 4 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 100 50 TOTAL 9,800 5,706 FY 16-17 YR 4 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 City of Palm Desert 5of5 Mark Greenwood 760-776-6469 May 10, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 8,930,500 2,789,000 11,719,500 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST (8000's) MEASURE A FUNDS (8000's) 2017-2018 1 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Maintenance Project 3,500 1,900 2 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100 100 3 Cook Street Widening - Phase II Roadway Widening 6,100 2,000 4 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 100 50 5 Portola Interchange @ 1-10 On-ramp/Off-ramp construction 72,000 7,670 TOTAL 81,800 11,720 FY 17-18 YR 5 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Desert (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission CMeasure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,398,146, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 City of Palm Springs Department of Public 'Works and Engineering 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262 Tel: (760) 323-8253 • Fax: (760) 322-8360 • Web: wwwpalmspringsca.gov May 13, 2013 (Sent via e-mail, to follow with original) Ms. Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92502-22083 Re: Measure "A" Local Street & Road Program City of Palm Springs Annual Five -Year Measure "A" GIP (Fiscal Year 2013/14 - 2017/18) Dear Ms. Trevino: Enclosed, at RCTC's request, is the City's proposed Local Measure "A" Five -Year CIP Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013/2014 through 2017/2018, FY 2013/14 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement, and the Project Status Report for CIP Projects in FY 2012/13. As per requirements to participate in the Measure "A" Program, the City does participate in theme and TUMF program*. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 323-8253, extension 8732. Sincerely, David J. Barakian Director of Public Works/City Engineer Enclosures c: David H. Ready, City Manager Geoffrey Kiehl, Director of Finance/Treasurer Nancy Klukan, Asst. Director of Finance Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT - CIP Projects FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Came L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 08, 2013 (Revised June 6, 2013) Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) 12/13 FY Measure A Funds (Expended) Estimated Completion Status 1 Annual Overiay Road Maintenance $ 1,500,000 $ 1,024,971 Annually This project Is on -going. 2 Belardo Road Bridge Roadway and Bridge Construction $ 4,400,000 $ 1,344 Done This project is complete. 3 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation $ 5,000,000 $ - November 2014 This project Is in final design and RAW. 4 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 207,125 $ 18,549 Annually On -going per inspection/recommendations by Cattrans. 5 Citywide Traffic Signal InterconnecUTraffic Mngt Ctr Traffic Signal Improvements $ 2,100,000 $ 4,295 June 2014 This pro ect is In final design phase. 6 Date Palm / 1-10 Interchange Widening Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 16,800,000 $ 426,588 Fall 2013 This project is under construction. 7 Farrell Drive al Ramon Road Traffic Signal Modification Traffic Signal Improvements $ 138,455 $ 13,122 Done This pro ect is complete. 8 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (RR to Gamet Ave including UPRR Bridge Replacement) Roadway and Bridge Widening $ 18,932,000 $ 121,435 Fall 2015 Submitting Final Design 8 R/W Authorization to District. 9 Mid Valley Parkway Reimbursement (CVAG) Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,421 Annually This is an on -going annual reimbursement to CVAG 10 Ramon Road / 1-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 15,000,000 $ - Done This project is complete. (CVAG payment) 11 Ramon Widening Study ((g WVV Bridge) Planning Study $ 100,000 $ 12,470 June 2013 This project is In environmental / design phase Safe Routes to School Local Match Sidewalk Improvements $ 400,000 $ - June 2014 The project Is in preliminary design Slurry Seal Program Road Maintenance $ 1,000,000 $ 536,537 Annually This project Is on -going. Sunrise Way (d3 Ralph's Shopping Center Traffic Signal Improvements $ 300,000 $ - June 2014 This project is on -going. Warrants received. 15 Sunrise Way al Ramon Road Traffic Signal Update Traffic Signal Improvements $ 128,700 $ 7,065 Done This project Is complete. 16 Traffic Safety Project Traffic Safety Improvements $ 190,000 $ 17,485 These projects are on -going. 17 Unscheduled capital projects Various $ 279,677 $ 1,245 N/A Various on -going projects. 18 Vista Chino Bridge at Whilewater River (LWC) New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 15,363 June 2016 This project is in environmental / design phase. TOTALS 5 155,586,379 $ 2,210,890 Note: For the following projects, construction is complete, however, no Measure A funds expended this year or requested for CIP FY 12/13, but invoices have not been finalized by implementing agencies. Gene Autry Trail/1-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 18,000,000 $ - Done Construction is complete, but CVAG has not finalized invoice. Indian Canyon Dr/Interstate 10 Interchange Street Improvements $ 12,000,000 $ - Done Construction completed, but Riv. Co. has not finalized invoice. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 8, 2013 ""Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ ( 5,615,46 Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: $ [,854,000 .� Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: $ 7,469,465 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend In FY) 013-2014 1 Alejo Road at Avenida Caballeros Traffic Signal (Design) Traffic Improvements $ 300,000 $ 50,000 2 Agua Caliente Museum Roadway on Hermosa Drive Roadway Improvements $ 1,300,000 $ 550,000 3 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction Road Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 800,000 4 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 450,009 $ 450,000 5 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation $ 5,000,000 $ 501,502 6 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 207,125 $ 207,125 7 Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect/Traffic Management Ctr Traffic Signal Improvements $ 2,100,000 $ 28,797 8 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 150,000 $ 50,000 9 Date Palm Drive / I-10 Interchange Widening Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 16,800,000 $ 800,000 10 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 52,000- 11 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave including UPRR Bridge Widening) Roadway and Bridge Widening, $ 21,250,000 $ 550,000 12 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 13 North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dillion (MOU with DNS) Street Improvements; $ 600,000 $ 200,000 14 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance $ 250,000 $ 250,000 15 Ramon Road / 1-10 Interchange Expands Freeway Interchange $ 15,000,000 $ 87,958 16 Ramon Widening Study.@ WW Bridge Pannl Stud $ 100,000 $ 60,000 17 SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 13/14) Si a Construction $ 90,000 $ 30,00Q 18 South Palm Canyon @ Arenas Wash (LWC) New Bridge New Bridge $ 4,875,000 $ • 75,000 19 South Palm Canyon @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 52,000 20 Sunrise Way at Ralph's Shopping Center Traffic Signal Installation $ 300,000 $ 300,000 21 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 190,000 $ 80,000 22 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 100,000 TOTALS $ 176,610,547 $ 5,384,804 " Dollar amount derived by using end of FY balances and outstanding encumbrances available in the City's Finance Budget System RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 8, 2012 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 2,084,661 Estimated FY2014-2015 Measure AAllocation: $ 1,910,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $ 3,994,661 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits • Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2014-2015 1 Alejo Road at Avenida Caballeros Traffic Signal Traffic Improvements $ 300,000 $ 250,000 2 Annual Overlay& Reconstruction Road Maintenance $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 3 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 4 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ ' 100,000 $ 100,000 5 East Palm Canyon Drive @ Palm Cyn Wash (Bridge_ Rehab.) Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 52,000 6 Indian Canyon Drive UPRR Bridge Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave Including UPRR Bridge Widening) Roadway & Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 300,000 7 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422• $ 10,422 8 South Palm Canyon Drive @ Arenas Wash (LWC) New Bridge $ 4,875,000 $ 402,000 9 South Palm Canyon Drive @ Tahquitz Creek (Bridge Replace.) Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 52,000 10 Traffic Calming Program Traffic Improvements $ 50,000 $ 50,000 11 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 40,000 $ 40,000 TOTALS $ 39,963,M $ 2,756,422 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2096 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 e48732 Date: May 8, 2012 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,238,239 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,967,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015.2016 Projects: $ 3,205,239 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2015-2016 1 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction Road Maintenance $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 3 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Cyn Wash (Bridge Rehab.) Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 12,000 4 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Gamet Ave Including UPRR Bridge Widening) Road/Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 500,000 5 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 6 Ramon Road Widening (Sunrise Way to El Cielo Road) Road Widening $ 4,000,000 $ 250,000 7 South Palm Canyon Drive eTahquitz Creek (Bridge Replacement) Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 35,000 8 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Signal Modifications $ 40,000 $ 40,000 TOTALS $ 37,938,422 $ 2,347,422 /, RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 8, 2012 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 857,817 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $2,026,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 2,883,817 Item No. Project Name 1 Lrmits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2016-2017 1 Annual Slung Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 2 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 3 East Palm Canyon Drive @ Palm Canyon Wash/Bridge Rehab.) Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 572,000 4 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements. $ 10,422 $ 10,422 5 Ramon Road Widening (Sunrise Way to El Cielo Road) Roadwa r�Widening $ 4,000,000 $ 750,000 6 South Palm Canyon Drive @ Tahquitz Creek (Bridge Replace.) Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 571,000 7 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Signal Modifications $ 40,000 $ 40,000 TOTALS $ 16,288,422 $ 2,543,422 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 8, 2012 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 340,395 / Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,087,000 ✓ Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 2,427,395 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds iTo Expend in FY) 2017-2018 1 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction Road Maintenance $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 3 Mid -Valley Parkway_Reimbursement - CVAG $ 10,422 $ 10,422 4 SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 16/17) $ 90,000 $ 30,000 5 Traffic Calming Program Traffic Improvements $ 50,000 $ 50,000 6 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 40,000 $ 40,000 TOTALS $ 1,690,422 $ 1,630,422/ FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,498,732, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds._ Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: , 2013 ATTEST: 0 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PERRIS FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 CITY OF PERRIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 101 North ‘D' Street, Perris, CA 92570-2200 TEL: 951-943-4610 FAX: 951-943-5065 May 6, 2013 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County of Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Shirley Medina Re: FY 2014-2018 Measure"A" Improvement Plan Enclosed, please find City of Perris proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed, please find an exhibit depicting the status of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE prepared by the Finance Department and signed by the City Manager. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Cut,--13 Jennifer Erwin Assistant Director of Finance Cc: Ron Carr, Assistant City Manager Habib Motlagh, City Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #. (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013, Revised May 30, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 607 2012 One Phase Complete Metz Rd Paving New Paving 180 167 Complete . Ethanac & Encanto Pavement Rehab 164 164 2013 Contract Awarded Placentia / Murrieta New Paving 450 250 2013 Complete TOTALS 2,294 1,188 • Ethanac Road is 2nd Phase of Encanto Project. Encanto is complete and Ethanac Road is under construction. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: $1,875,000 $1,194,000 $3,069,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 Widening, Pavement 1,700 , 400 1 Perris Blvd. Improvements from Ramona Exp. To Perry Rehab. Perris Blvd. Improvements from San Pavement Rehab. 1,000 400 2 Jacinto Avenue to 1-215 Bridge 3 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement maintenance 1,500 1,000 4 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement maintenance 50 50 Project Oversight & 250 250 5 1-215 Widening Coordination TOTALS 4,500 2,100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $969,000 / $1,230,000 $2,199, 000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Perris Blvd. from San Jacinto Ave. to 4th Street Widening, right-of-way 2,500 1,000 2 Annual Slurry Seal and Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,000 750 Redlands Blvd. from San Jacinto Pavement Rehab 700 400 3 Avenue to Rider TOTALS 4,200 2,150 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $49,000 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $1,267,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $1,316,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 1,000 2 Nuevo Road from Redlands to Widening & Pavement 1,200 300 Murrieta Rehab. TOTALS 2,700 1,300 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $16,000 $1,305,000 ‘f $1,321,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type . Total Cost ($000'8) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 1,000 2 Ramona Expressway (City Limits) Pavement Rehab. 1,000 300 TOTALS 2,500 1,300 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 2018 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $21,000 $1,344,000 // $1,365,000 Item No. Project Name/ Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 1,000 2 Placentia Avenue (1-215 to Indian) New Paving 600 344 TOTALS 2,100 1,344 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for the City of Perris that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission CMeasure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,218,470, approved by the Commission at its July 2011 meeting, and that the City of Perris shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the City of Perris for local transportation purposes. The City of Perris hereby acknowledges that the failure of the City of Perris to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the City of Perris commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: net.nAA c1 , 2013 Ri har• Be ud , City - nager ATTEST: -7120‘0",41,_ Ron Carr, Assistant City Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Bruce B. Harry, Jr. Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: $2,065,989 $814,000 2,879,989 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance 250 250 2 Monterey Avenue Street Improvements (Gerald Ford to Monterey) Widening/Reconstruction 1,200 350 3 Highway 111/Frank Sinatra Drive Intersection Improvements Safety and Capacity 1,800 450 4 Desert Sun Ranch Street Improvements Widening/Reconstruction 800 600 5 Administration of Programmed Projects Administration 25 25 TOTALS 4,075 1,675 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Bruce B. Harry, Jr. Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $1,204,989 $838;poo $2 042,989.' Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver. Preventative Maintenance 1,000 750 2 Bob Hope/Frank Sinatra Intersection Improvements Safety & Capacity 1,800 400 3 Highway 111 (Magnesia Falls Dr to South City Limits) Pavement Reconstruction 350 350 4 Administration of Programmed Projects Administration 25 25 TOTALS 3,175 1,525 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Bruce B. Harry, Jr. Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $517,989 $863,000 1,380,98940 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance 250 250 2 Highway 111 (Country Club Dr to Magnesia Falls Dr) Pavement Reconstruction 1,250 850 3 Administration of Programmed Projects Administration 25 25 TOTALS 1,525 1,125 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Bruce B. Harry, Jr. Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $255,989 $889,000 13.44. 989 0:0' Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance 850 850 2 Highway 111 (Country Club Dr to North City Limits) Pavement Reconstruction 1,500 250 3 Administration of Programmed Projects Administration 25 25 TOTALS 2,375 1,125 9L8 gL8 S1H101 sperom pewww6ad }o uogei;siuwwpy •Jenedoion Aci panum spe4s ogind snouen uo 6u!cluis pue sAepeno oy yeas >pan yeas kinis apinnirtliO Z 6 gZ 098 gZ 099 uoRea;siuiwpy eoueua;umm emewanald 860Z-L60Z (s.000$) spun4 d amend (s.000$) woo le;ol adl(l;Darold s;lwll / aweN;oefoid 'oN wall 6865€6 000'9T6$ 686'6 6$ :s;oafoad 860Z-L60Z Ad Jo; GICIBHEAV b &meow pa;ewl;s3 :uol;eooll`d V airmen! 860Z-L60Z Ad pa;ewl;s3 :eouele8 b amseaw JeaA aopd pa;ewl;s3 940Z - 140Z Ad W n190dd SaNnd 7V307 V 3dr1 SV3N NOISSIINNOO NOLLVI JOdSNVaL A1Nn00 3GISH3Ald £60Z `£6 Ae/N :a;ea VZZ£-OLL (09L) # auoyd 'tiueH -8 aonae pondald 9;o g abed e6enW oyouea :Aoua6b RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Bruce B. Harry, Jr. Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 Citywide slurry and crack seal on various public streets Preventative Maintenance 800 800 Jun-13 Construction Summer 2013 2 Monterey Ave St. Improvements (Gerald Ford to Monterey) Widening/Reconstruction 1,100 250 Jul-14 In Final Design 3 Highway 111/Frank Sinatra Drive Intersection Improvements Safety/Capacity 1,200 300 Jul-14 Awaiting Construction RFA 4 Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Channel (PA&ED) New Bridge 1,200 35 Jul-14 PA&ED In Progress 5 Desert Sun Ranch Street Improvements Widening/Reconstruction 600 500 Oct-13 Out to Bid TOTALS 4,900 1,885 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Rancho Mirage (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $674,811, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: Mt"! 4 , 2013 . \.L.,„• „E. CITY MANAGER ATTEST: AU:4,� SE ETARY Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF RIVERSIDE FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 CITY OF r 1\1:l��ll�l Public Works Department DECIME1 MAY 13 2013 TRANSPORTATIOCOUNTY COMMISSION Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, ri Floor Riverside, CA 92501 May 13, 2013 Attn.: Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Subject: Measure A Maintenance of Effort, CIl'_and Project Status Report Enclosed are the City of Riverside's FY 2013/14 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement, Measure A Local Funds Capital hnpremement Program for FY 2013/14 through FY 2017/18 and a status report for FY 2012/13. If you have any questions, please contact Patrick Keeney at (951) 826-2406. Sincerely' Thomas J. Boyd Public Works Director Attachments g\admin\common\measure of effort\12 13 FY\rctc 1213 moe & cip for 1314 letter 05132013 3900 Main Street • Riverside, CA 92522 • 951.826.5341 • fax 951.826.5542 • www.riversideca.gov RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2012-13 Agency: City of Riverside Page 1 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($0001S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 8623 Arlington Ave Rehab - Van Buren to SR 91 Street Resurfacing 2,100 50 Design in progress. *42 8254 Collett Extension - Napa to Buchanan New Street Construction 2,485 400 Design in progress. *10 5951 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,540 *420 Pending billing from school district. 8624 Jurupa Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 300 Design in progress. 5984 Jurupa Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 5,434 *24 Construction complete. Required Environmental mitigation still underway. 8529 Main Street - SR 60 to 1st Street Street Resurfacing 2,520 *2,422 Construction complete. Project in close out process. 8439 Major Street Rehabilitation 10/11 Street Resurfacing 1,457 *1,231 Project is complete. 8530 Major Street Rehabilitation 11/12 Street Resurfacing 1,400 *1,400 Design in progress. 8656 Market St Slurry - Mission Inn Ave to 1st St / Street Slurry 100 *100 Design in progress. 5866 Miscelllaneous Railroad Project Management Grade Separations 360 *24 Ongoing project management. 8656 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement 100 100 City contribution for County project. 8447 Myrtle @ Victoria Intersection Intersection Improvements 154 *141 Project is complete. 8617 Paving Projects Bonds - Debt Serivce Street Paving 3,000 3,000 Annual debt service. 5901 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Quiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 15,458 *7 Project is underway. nor years unexpended tunas auiy , zo12. G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\12 13 FY\Measure A Status 2013 with Project RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2012-13 Agency: City of Riverside Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST (S000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS MOOS) STATUS 8610 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce, ZQuiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 4,120 20 Design in progress. 5934 Quiet Zone/BNSF/UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Quiet Zone for BNSF & UP Railroads 1,700 *79 Design in progress. 5899 RR Grade Separation - Iowa Avenue Grade Separation - Iowa @ BNSF 32,326 *224 Construction contract awarded in June 2012. 5898 RR Grade Separation - Madison Street Grade Separations - Madison @ BNSF 35,000 *31 Project on hold pending availability of funding. 5897 RR Grade Separation - Magnolia Avenue. / Grade Separation - Magnolia @ UPRR 53,632 *69 Project construction is complete. Outstanding right-of-way litigation pending. 5960 RR Grade Separation - Mary Street Grade Separation - Mary @ BNSF 35,000 *175 Project on hold pending availability of funding. 5957 RR Grade Separation - Riverside Avenue Grade Separation - Riverside @ UPRR 35,360 *372 Design and right-of-way acquisition in progress. 5958 RR Grade Separation - Streeter Avenue Grade Separation - Streeter @ UPRR 33,397 *1,443 Construction contract awarded in October 2012. 5853 Railroad Grade Separations - Debt Service Grade Separations 832 484 For debt service or allocation to specific *348 projects. 8626 Tequesquite Park Street Improvements Street Reconstruction/Improvements 1,000 1,000 Construction is underway. 5948 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 8,000 *2,044 Design and right-of-way acquisition in progress. rior vears unexpended funds at July 1, 2012. G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\12 13 F11Measure A Status 2013 with Project RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2012-13 Agency: City of Riverside Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MOOS) MEASURE A FUNDS (S000'S) STATUS 5894 Van Buren Blvd. Improvements - Garfield to Street Resurfacing 1,730 *320 Project is complete. Wells 8634 Van Buren Blvd. Improvements - Wells to Jackson Street Resurfacing 2,195 *2,025 Project split into phases (formerly Garfield to Jackson). Design in progress. 5952 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Indiana to South Street Widening 26,750 *78 Project on hold until funding is available. City Limit 8409 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Jurupa to Santa Street Widening 1,605 *1,408 Design in progress. Ana River Bridge 5355 Van Buren Blvd / 91 Fnvy Interchange ✓ Interchange Improvements 34,125 *5 Project construction is complete. Final right- of-way litigation and project close out pending. 8196 Arlington - Van Buren to La Sierra Signal Coordination 40 *40 Design in progress. 5862 Arterial Interconnections Signal Coordinations 738 100 Project is underway. *214 8197 California - Arlington to Tyler Signal Coordination 40 *39 Project is complete. 5888 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Signal Coordinations 85 *22 On -going signal coordination work. 8198 Chicago - Central to Martin Luther King Signal Coordination 18 - Project is complete. 8202 Fiber Optic Line to Caltrans Signal Coordination 86 *82 Project is underway. 8528 Iowa - Citrus New Traffic Signal 250 250 To be installed in final stage of grade separation. G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\12 13 FY\Measure A Status 2013 with Project RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2012-13 Agency: City of Riverside Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 5861 Miscellaneous Signal Revisions Signal Modifications 874 100 Project is underway. *226 8575 Miscellaneous Traffic Designs Traffic Projects Design 100 `42 Project is underway. 8396 Multi -Agency Traffic Coordination Signal Coordination 822 *91 Construction is complete. Project close 8463 out is underway 8341 New Traffic Signals Signal Installation 650 250 Design in progress. *400 8647 SR2S - Jefferson/Madison Signals New Traffic & Pedestrian Signals 388 50 Design in progress. 8625 University - Fairmount New Traffic Signal 200 200 Design in progress. 5092 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 Ongoing annual expenditure. 5138 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 105 105 Ongoing annual expenditure. 5183 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 Ongoing annual expenditure. 8619 LED Signal Lenses Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 50 50 Ongoing annual expenditure. 5846 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 Ongoing annual expenditure. 5931 Traffic Management Center Signal Coordination 157 50 Ongoing annual expenditure. `107 5847 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 Ongoing annual expenditure. 5208 Traffic. Planning/Investigations Traffic Engineering 300 300 Ongoing annual expenditure. or years unexpended funds at July 1, 2012. GAAdmin\Common\Measure of Effort11213 FY\Measure A Status 2013 with Project Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 19,253 5,918 25,171 Item No. Project Name i Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2113-2014 1 Arlington Ave - Fairhaven to City Limit Traffic Safety Improvements 1,213 500 2 Arlington Ave - Van Buren to SR 91 Street Resurfacing 2,100 *92 3 Collett Extension - Napa to Buchanan New Street Construction 2,485 *410 4 Indiana Widening (§) Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,540 *420 5 Jurupa Ave Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 *300 6 Jurupa Ave Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 5,434 *24 7 Main Street Reconstruction - SR 60 to 1st Street Reconstruction and Improvements 2,520 •2,422 G:1Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\12 13 FY\AAeasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 1 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: M 10, 2013 Ma Item No. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Project Name / Limits 2 1 -2014 8 Major Street Rehabilitation 11/12 9 Major Street Rehabilitation 13/14 10 Market Street Arbor Repair sic) SR 60 11 Market Street - Mission Inn to 1st 12 Market Street Bridge Replacement 13 Misc. Railroad Project Management 14 Mission Blvd Bridge Repalcement Project Type Street Resurfacing Street Resurfacing Public Right -of -Way Repairs Street Slurry City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Grade Separation City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Total Cost (SO00'0 1,400 2,710 50 100 100 460 100 Measure A Funds ( 00%) •1,400 900 50 `100 100 100 *24 *100 15 Paving Projects Bonds - Debt Service' Street Paving 3,000 3,000 'For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and subsfitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:\Admin\Common1Measure of Effort\12 13 FrMeasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 2 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ( 00%) Measure A Funds (SO00%) 2113-2014 16 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Railroad Quiet Zone 15,458 '7 17 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone 4,120 *20 18 Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone 1,700 292 `79 19 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Railroad Quiet Zone 1,700 200 20 Railroad Grade Separation - Iowa Grade Separation 32,326 *224 21 Railroad Grade Separation - Madison Grade Separation/Preliminary Design 35,000 *31 22 Railroad Grade Separation - Magnolia Grade Separation 53,632 *69 23 Railroad Grade Separation - Mary Grade Separation 35,000 `175 G:1Admin1Common1Measure of Effort112 13 FY1Measure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 3of15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Bern No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000%) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 24 Railroad Grade Separation - Riverside Grade Separation 35,360 *372 25 Railroad Grade Separation - Streeter Grade Separation 33,397 *1,443 26 Railroad Grade Separations - Debt Service Grade Separation 832 '832 27 Sidewalk/Trail Construction 13/14 Sidewalk Construction 500 500 28 Tequesquite Park Street Improvements Street Reconstruction and Improvements 1,000 *1,000 29 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 8,000 `2,044 30 Van Buren - Indiana to South City Limit Street Widening 26,750 *78 31 Van Buren - Jurupa to Santa Ana River Street Widening 1,605 *1,408 32 Van Buren/91 Freeway Interchange Interchange Improvements 34,125 .5 G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort112 13 FY\Measure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 4 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (5000's) Measure A Funds ( 00%) 2013-2114 33 Van Buren - Wells to Jackson Street Resurfacing 2,195 *2,025 34 14th/Martin Luther King - Market to 1-215 Traffic Signal Coordination 50 50 35 Arlington - Van Buren to La Sierra Traffic Signal Coordination 40 -40 36 Arterial Interconnections Traffic Signal Coordination 314 *314 37 Brockton Protective/Permissive Left Turns Traffic Signal Revisions 100 100 38 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Traffic Signal Coordination 85 *22 39 Fiber Optic Line to CalTrans Traffic Signal Coordination 86 *82 40 Iowa - Citrus New Traffic Signal 250 *250 41 Lincoln - St. Lawrence New Traffic Signal 250 250 G:1Admin\CommonlMeasure of Effort112 13 FY\Measure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 5 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 42 Miscellaneous Traffic Designs Traffic Projects Design 100 `42 43 Multi -Agency Traffic Coordination Traffic Signal Coordination 822 *91 44 New Traffic Signals - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 650 *650 45 Traffic Management Center Traffic Signal Coordination 207 50 *157 46 Traffic Signal Revisions Traffic Signal Revision 874 `326 47 University - Brockton to Campus Traffic Signal Coordination 50 50 48 University - Fairmount New Traffic Signal 200 *200 49 ransportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 G\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\12 13 FY\Measure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 6 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10. 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost M00%) Measure A Funds M00%) 2013-2014 51 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 52 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 53 LED Signal Lenses Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 50 50 54 Roadside Signs Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signage Maintenance 50 50 55 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 56 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 57 Safe Routes to School-Jefferson/Madison Signals New Traffic Signals 388 '50 TOTALS 351,338 24,130 • Indicates Measure A funding in prior fiscal years and not expended at 7/1/11. G:1Admin\Common\Measure of Effort112 13 MMeasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 7 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 1,041 6,096 7,137 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (5000%) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Arlington Ave - Van Buren to SR 91 2 Major Street Rehabilitation 14/15 3 Paving Projects Bonds - Debt Service' 4 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton 8 Palm 5 Traffic Signal Improvements 6 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations Street Resurfacing Street Resurfacing Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision New Traffic Signal Installation 2,100 1,400 3,000 1,700 435 250 600 1,400 3,000 610 435 250 `For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:1Admin1Common\Measure of Effort\12 13 PANIeasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 8 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (5000%) Measure A Funds ($000%) 201 15 - 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 5% " 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 9 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 9,360 6,770 G:1Admin\Common1Measure of Effort112 13 FY1Measure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 9 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 nem No. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: J 367 6,279 !/ 6,646 Project Name / Limits 2015-2016 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 15/16 2 Paving Projects Bonds - Debt Service' 3 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton 8 Palm 4 Traffic Signal Improvements 5 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations 6 Transportation Planning Project Type Street Resurfacing Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision New Traffic Signal Installation Engineering Planning I oral (Ass ($000%) 1,400 3,000 1,700 435 250 50 Measure A Funds ($000's) 1,400 3,000 628 435 250 50 'For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs fo the ones listed. G:1NdminlCommoMMeasure of Effort112 13 FY1Measure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 10 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (5000's) Measure A Funds ($000%) 2015-2016 7 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 8 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 7,260 6,188 G:1AdminlCommon1Measure of Effort112 13 FYWeasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 11 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Item No. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION • MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: V 458 6,467 6,925 Project Name / Limits 2016-2017 1 Canyon Crest - Country Club to Via Vista 2 3 4 5 6 Major Street Rehabilitation 16/17 Paving Projects Bonds - Debt Service` Project Type Street Widening Street Resurfacing Street Paving Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge 8 Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton ✓3< Palm Traffic Signal Improvements Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision total cost ($000's) 6,000 1,400 3,000 1,700 1,700 435 measure n Funds ($000's) 450 1,400 3,000 384 263 435 "For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:Vldmin1Common\Measure of Effort\12 13 FY\Measure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 12 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type • Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 7 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50" ) 50 9 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 10 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 14,960 6,657 G:\Admin\CommoMMeasure of Effort\12 13 PAMeasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 13 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 10, 2013 item No. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 268 6,661 6,929 ./ Project Name / Limits 2017-2018 1 Canyon Crest - Country Club to Via Vista 2 3 4 5 Major Street Rehabilitation 17/18 Paving Projects Bonds - Debt Service* Street Widening Street Resurfacing Street Paving Project Type Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision New Traffic Signal Installation oral l.oat (5000%) 6,000 1,400 3,000 1,700 435 250 measure A Funds ($000'5) 700 1,400 3,000 666 435 250 'For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. GAAdmin\Common\Measure of Effort112 13 FYWleasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 14 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: Ma V 10. 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000'8) Measure A Funds ($000%) 20 -# 8 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 0 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 9 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 13,260 6,926 G:1Admin1CommonlMeasure of Effortl12 13 FYlMeasure A CIP 2014-2018 05102013 Page 15 of 15 FY 2013/14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Riverside (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $12,449,203, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 13 , 2013 C MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM ctnrAv'"'"""'"" Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 May 13, 2013 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department DECEOVE ull MAY os 2013 J Ms. Shirley Medina RIVERSIDE COUNTY Riverside County Transportation CommissioRRANSPORrArION COMMISSION 4080 S. Lemon St., Third floor Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Dear Ms. Medina: AT1oN O Juan C. Perez, P.E., LE Director of Transportation and Land Management Attached is the Courlrffve ar program of projects for the-Coutaty's portion of Measure A funds fq# Fi tear 20,14/2018 The..County's Trah*portation Department receives no generol f tndsAnd no certification of MOE is included: Also.;attached is A:: copy of our'Fiscat8ear i} ] Ili! #t AO#1: ttts adtf *sing project status, project additions andzdes' Fia€ScfiileXietcfitue'a' based on revenue .i projections. These projects are inoai"orated in the pliOnty's proposed Fiscal YSar 2013/2014 Transportation ImProyerrent Plarv(TIFO itch iiplanned for Board approval. We will inform your agenck,.of*fthan es 45ccupto the Measure A pr6gram due to future =revisions of the Col.inta Tl� t* ter; yjpw� akk. # If you have any questions °Once�iCig th!s=)rogram, please;fi 'el fr6,eto alc (951) 955-6740. r' Sincerel Patricia Romo Assistant Director of Transportation RKN: attachments cc: Rebecca Carr Glenn Higa/Roy Null (transmittal only) 4080 Lemon Street, 8's Floor • Riverside, California 92501 • (951) 955-6740 P.O. Box 1090 • Riverside, California 92502-1090 • FAX (951) 955-3198 FY 2013/2017 Program with Status Comments RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A° LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Page 1 Fiscal years 2013-2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Fund Source Legend: 300 = Western County, 301 = Coachella Valley, 302 = Palo Verde Valley Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 06th St Lakeview Ave East .40 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ramona Expwy 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) completed 5 12th St Wren Dr .36 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 11th St 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) _ Gor►f.ple.fied 5 13th St Lakeview Garden Dr .37 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Resurf AC paved road p l of ed 5 14th Ave De Frain Blvd .88 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Alon Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 're C.o./API-id by_ _W,3a 4 21st Ave W Circle B Dr 0.02 mi .04 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E Circle B Dr 0.02 mi 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) 4 42nd St/Tilton Ave Area Sidewalks - Group 1 2 Pacific Ave Twinning St 2.80 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Const sidewalk and street lights 11 streets being improved. Misc. funds are RCSD. Cot�plei"e�, 64th Ave Grant 2606'E'ly Grant St .49 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf AC paved road _G om p feted 4 Total 300 257 other Total 257 300 70 other Total 70 300 82 other Total 82 302 156 other • Total 156 301 12 other Total 12 300 450 other 60 Total 510 301 159 other Total 159 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 j 16/17 DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 2541 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 • 01 01 0 Cl 671 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 • 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 791 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 OJ 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 1531 01 01 01 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde DI 01 11 01 01 0 El 01 11 01 01 0 111 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 101 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 1351 01 El 01 01 RI 01 01 CI 3151 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 '01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 D1 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 1561 Oj 01 Oj 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EN (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist 66th Ave Harrison St (old SH86) .00 (mi) Install Traffic Signal (ft) / (ft) Gel m ( Q-f2d ..p 4 73rd Ave 4 Windlass Dr E'ly Windlass Dr .16mi .16 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road cat, Alessandro Ave S'ly Cypress 0.02 mi .79 (mi) Grind and Resurf Ramona Expy 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) 3 Alessandro Ave Artesia Ave .81 (mi) resurf AC paved road 3 Ramona Expy 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) ..:to _com. lete ..by.. 6j30 Alexander St Wells St .11 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly Moore St 0.02 mi 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) ---Gorn.pfe,`gd 1 Apache Tr/ I-10 Interchange Seminole Dr Main St .20 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Const Roundabouts at 2 off/on ramp intersections keep open for FY12-13. Final project close-out working with Cal -Trans. crap 142.te d .... . 5 Apricot Ave North Ave .60 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 11th St 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Go14,t,tej-¢d 5 Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 301 431 other 704 Total 1135 301 34 other Total 34 300 507 other Total 507 300 346 other Total 346 300 91 other Total 91 300 4 other Total 4 300 106 other Total 106 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 16/16 1 16/17 D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 4311 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 321 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 01 351 01 0l 0 El 01 21 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 01 4701 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0. RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 3451 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 891 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 21 01 01 01 0 CI 21 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 1031 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EN (ft) /PW (ft) Supv.Dist Arrowhead Blvd N'ly 14th Ave 0.04 mi .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road I-10 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) deld_,?..c1 . . Avenida Florencita Camino Aventura Camino Campanero .50 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Const curb, gutter 8 sidewalk on east side desijn Pr 1MSS Banner St 13th St .32 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Apricot Ave 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) _�.wa.p l a.tgd Barnacle Dr Rocky Point Dr .20 (mi) Reconst RMS paved road S'ly Rocky Point .2 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) c44,m p l eted_. Bautista Rd Upper Valley Rd 1.25 (mi) Reconst AC paved road S'ly 1.25 mi 25 (ft) / (ft) Go mp (eteof Beam Dr Galley Dr .14 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Pilot Dr 36 (ft) / 36 (ft) Bennett Rd Dillon Rd 1.12 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 1.12 mi 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 4 302 180 other Total 180 4 301 154 other 153 Total 307 5 300 79 other Total 79 4 301 97 other Total 97 3 300 649 other Total 649 4 301 36 other Total 36 4 301 187 other Total 187 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 Dl 01 01 0 El 0l 01 0 R1 01 of o Cl 01 01 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde Of 391 101 01. 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 0 Cl 311 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R( Of Oj Oj Of 0 Cl 761 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DJ 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 941 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 6461 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 1E 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 Of 0 R1 01 01 OJ 01 0 Cl 341 Of 01 Of 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 01 11 01 01 0 El 01 11 01 01 0 R1 01 Of Of 01 0 Cl 01 1851 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley . RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Blackwell Blv Sutherland Ave .10 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Grand Ave 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) tc cow, Pl efe- bty 6/3° Briggs Rd Augie Ct N'ly 0.41 mi .62 (mi) (ft)/ 38 (ft) Realign AC paved roads to ultimate alignment including Baxter Rd from new Briggs Rd to Rockrose Ln. C omtpLa.f ¢ cf .,_ _ Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 1 300 23 other Total 23 3 300 167 other 3929 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 DI 11 01 01 01 0 E1 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 211 01 01 0,1 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 4096 DI 01 01 01 E1 01 01 OI RI 01 01 01 CI 1671 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 Briggs Rd $ Baxter Rd .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Loan Payback for road improvements built under project C2-0156. Agenda 3.24 3/20/12. $180k/yr x 4 years after construction finish. 3 300 720 other Total 720 DI 01 01 01 01 0 EI 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 1801 5401 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Butterfield Stage Rd 3 300 66 Auld Rd Murrieta Hot Sprgs Rd 2.11 (mi) (ft)/ 48 (ft) Const AC paved road other 16123 Part of the Eastern Bypass Corridor Co w+ p l a.t4Zal Cabazon Area Resurfacing Group 13 Various Streets 3.65 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved road See included list at end of district section. Total 16189 5 300 1754 other Total 1754 DI 331 01 01 01 0 E1 331 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI E1 RI CI 1621 01 01 0 81 01 01 0 01 01 01 01 0 01 15491 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Cactus Ave Interchange I-216 .55 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 76 (ft) Recon and widen overpass and ramps Moreno Valley is the lead agency Funds shown are for County's coordination. in acfi.JQ-.----.... _ 5 300 1 other Total 1 DI it 01 E1 01 01 RI 01 01 CI 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 Camino del Sol Area Group 2 3 Area Streets .24 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved road The project is to finish work on 3 streets re- maining from project X1106 due to high ground de<ti yed 1 300 154 other Total 154 DI 40I 01 01 01 0 El O1 01 01 01 0 RI OI 01 01 01 0 CI 1141 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Chico Cir Circle B Dr . .03 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road NW'ly 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 4 Chip Seal of 1st District roads FY12/13 various roads 19.10 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Chip Seal Lov+nplefie� 1 Chip Seal of 3rd District roads FY12/13 various roads 26.90 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Chip Seal cowl pie tad 3 Chip Seal of 4th District roads FY12/13 various roads 49.80 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Chip Seal 4 fc . cc w,p ( else by_ .4/(3d Chip Seal of 5th District roads FY12/13 various roads 36.90 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Chip Seal e. -eci 5 Chuckwalla Vly Rd 4 22915' SE Corn Springs 33475' SE Corn Springs 2.00 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road comj,liate b�..413a Citrus View Cir Suttles Dr .08 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 443' E Suttles Dr 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) to 4or►1p(.42.te_ 6y 4/30 1 Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 301 18 other Total 18 300 483 other Total 483 300 699 other Total 699 301 1360 other Total 1360 300 960 other Total 980 302 495 other Total 495 300 31 other Total 31 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 DI 01 11 01 01 0 El 01 11 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 161 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 4831 OJ 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 6991 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 0l 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 13601 01 0l 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 01 01 01 01 .0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R. 01 01 01 01 0 CI 9801 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 4921 OJ 01 01 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 291 Oj 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 6 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Club Dr Quail Dr .54 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Theda St 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Go►vtp rated 5 Coachella Valley Area various roads 6.00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 4 Contreras Rd Johnson Rd .49 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S.H. 371 27 (ft)/ 27 (fit) 3 Countywide Solar Radar Speed Feedback Signs 3 various locations .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Install Solar Powered Radar Speed Feedback Signs De Portola Rd E. Benton Rd .18 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E. Benton Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) . ro. compre+� 175 4436 3 Dillon Rd 44th Ave .91 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Nly Landfill Rd 0.28mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) __--C4. plafed 4 Earthmover Cir 1 Temescal Canyon Rd 318' SW Temescal CynRd .06 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurf AC paved road �o co.nap/ete- b y 6/34> Total 300 85 other Total 85 301 1350 other_ Total 1350 300 327 other Total 327 300 297 other Total 297 300 54 other Total 54 301 121 other 41 Total 162 300 28 other Total 28 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01. 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 831 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 1501 4001 4001 400 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 01 11 01 01 0 El 01 11 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 3251 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 51 51 51 01 0 E1 01 01 01 01 0 R1 OI 01 01 01 0 Cl 941 941 941 01 0 300 Measure A/Western 01 11 01 01 01 0 E1 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 521 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 01 01 01 01 0 E1 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 1211 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 11 01 01 01 0 E1 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 261 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 E1 Centro Wy 4 301 58 Calle Helene Monte Vista .27 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other *o cow,pla172 fey 42f3o Total 58 DI 21 01 El 11 01 RI 01 01 CI 551 01 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley E1 Sobrante Rd 1 300 3240 Cajalco Rd Mc Allister Rd 5.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon AC paved road other Total 3240 DI 01 2251 01 01 0 El 01 51 01 01 .0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 30101 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Evelyn Way 3 300 • 60 Stetson Ave Frances St .09 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Reconst AC paved road other detel4c1 Total 60 DI 21 01 01 El 11 01 01 RI 01 01 01 C 1 ...-571— 01 01 yo 300 Measure A/Western 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 Fantail Dr 4 301 53 Beacon Dr Sunfish Ln .22 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other G c rnp I g44.d Total 53 DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 511 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Flag Pole Ct 5 300 . 9 Banner St E'ly Banner St .03 mi .03 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Cpn4p (-fated Total 9 DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 71 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Frances Ln 3 300 80 Evelyn Wy San Jacinto St .12 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Reconst AC paved road other d eta./ ed Total 80 DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 7' Z7 1 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Frontage Rd 3 300 113 Rainbow Canyon Rd / N San Diego C.L. .67 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total 113 DI 01 11 01 01 0 El 01 11 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 1111 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 12/13 113/14 1 14/15 115/16 116/17 Garden Dr 5 300 40 Nuevo Rd 13th St .22 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total 40 DI El RI CI 11 OI OI OI. 0 11 OI OI OI 0 OI OI OI OI 0 381 OI OI OI 0 300 Measure A/Western Gilman Springs Rd 5 300 39 N'ly Eucalyptus 0.03mi SEly Alessandro 0.56mi .59 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other 4400 To be constructed with safety project. P5,.tE Go►'NP(Q-tetc{ Total 4439 DI 341 OI OI OI 0 El 51 01 OI OI 0 RI OI OI OI OI 0 CI OI OI OI OI 0 300 Measure A/Western Gilman Springs Rd 5 300 483 Alessandro Blvd .00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 42 (fit) Constr L.turn pocket on Gilman Springs Rd other Coordinate w/ City of Moreno Valley co�Sf, d42.64y014 Total 483 DI 351 OI OI OI 0 El 151 OI OI OI 0 CI OI OI OI 0 OI OI OI 0 300 Measure A/Western Grant St 4 301 328 66th Ave 64th Ave .99 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other GornA(a...ct4d Total 328 DI 21 OI OI OI 0 EI 11. OI OI OI 0 RI OI OI OI OI 0 CI 3251 OI OI OI 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Grant St 2 300 152 Indiana Ave Magnolia Ave .23 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (fit) Const curb, gutter $ sidewalk on SW side other 156 from S'ly Harlow to Indiana Ave, and on both sides from Magnolia Ave to Tolton Ave. on Sc-Is ee/ule Total 308 DI 341 91 OI OI 0 El 1I OI OI OI 0 RI OI OI OI OI 0 CI OI 1081 OI OI 0 300 Measure A/Western Helm Cir 4 301 9 Beacon Dr N'ly Beacon Dr .03 mi .03 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other con,'p(m('ezed Total 9 DI 11 0+ OI OI 0 El 11 OI OI OI 0 RI 01. OI OI oI 0 CI 71 OI OI OI 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Indian Truck Tr Interchange 1 300 216 I-15 .20 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 87 (fit) Widen I.T.Trl, Ichg ramps and const signals other 4686. ____da/Qyed Total 4902 DI El RI CI OI OI OI OI OI 0 OI OI OI 0 OI. OI OI 0 OI OI OI 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 9 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Johnson Rd Contreras Rd .51 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Hill St 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Jurupa Rd Poinsetta P1 Rutile St .32 (mi) 61 (ft)/ 61 (ft) J Const sidewalk on N'ly side In the City of Jurupa Valley. Gc rvt-p, I e t'ect . Krameria Ave Gardner Ave Gamble Ave .50 (mi) 14 (ft)/ 20 (ft) Const curb, gutter, and sidewalk on north side comp!e:Fe 4 Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 3 300 259 other Total 259 2 300 85 other 116 Total 201 1 300 1 other 466 Total 467 300 174 other Total 174 3 300 866 other 1140 Total 2006 1 300 54 other Total 54 4 301 999 other 297 Total 1296 Lake St Thornton Ave .63 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 3 S'lyChambers Av .56 mi 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) delayed Leon Rd Keller Rd 1.00 (mi) Adjust AC road profile Half in City of Menifee Scott Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Lester Cir Temescal Canyon Rd .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 635'SW Temescal Cyn Rd 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 'f-O GoMp(ate. by 6132, Lincoln St 7th St 1.61 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 62nd Ave 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) de/a�ed 12/13 113/14 114/15 115/16 116/17 DI El RI CI 300 Measure A/Western OI OI 0 OI OI 0 OI OI 0 OI OI 0 DI oI of oI El oI oI oI RI of of oI CI 851 OI OI 300 Measure A/Western oI oI oI oI 0 0 0 0 DI oI oI El 01 01 RI OI OI CI 11 01 300 Measure A/Western oI oI oI 01 oI oI of 01 0 0 0 0 DI 21 01 oI El 11 oI oI RI 0I- OI OI CI ,4711 . oI oI /4n) 7/ 300 Measure A/Western DI oI oI El of of RI 0 OI_ C ( f493 I /3"" 73r 300 Measure A/Western oI oI oI of o1. oI oI of 0 0 0 0 oI oI oI oI 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 DI of oI oI El oI oI oI RI 0 OI OI CI 01 01 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 10 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Mac Arthur Dr 12th St .25 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 12th St .25 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) �o1441,(afed Magnolia Ave Lincoln St Buchanan St .50 (mi) 86 (ft)/ 86 (ft) Const grade separaton at BNSF RR Misc. Funds are expected from BNSF RR. RR X-ing 2B-20.3 Marcella Ln Evelyn Wy .12 (mi) Reconst AC paved road San Jacinto St 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) ,J2layed Merrell Ave Garden Dr .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'lyGarden Dr .12 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Mesa Rd Calle Campo .60 (mi) Reconst AC paved road De Portola Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Mitchell Rd Bautista Rd 1.43 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Regal Blue Tr 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds b Amount x D = Design R = Right E = Enviornmental C y Fiscal Year $1000 of Way Acquisition = Construction Total 5 300 64 other Total 64 2 300 208 other 46524 Total 46732 3 300 80 other Total 80 5 300 30 other Total 30 3 300 491 other Total 491 3 300 376 other Total 376 300 143 other Total 143 Mitchell Rd Kirby Rd .57 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 3 W'ly Bohlen Rd 0.11 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 DI 21 01 El 11 01 RI 01 01 CI 611 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 DI 931 01 El 01 01 RI 401 01 CI 751 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 DI 21 01 El 11 01 RI 01 01 91 5a 27 O 300 Measure A/Western o1 0l 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 DI 11 01 01 El 11 01 . 01 RI 01 01 01 CI 281 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 Dl 2J 01 01 El 1� 01 01 RI 01 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 DI El RI CI 01 01 01 01 11 11 01 3741 300 Measure A/Western 01 0i 01 01 0 0 0 0 DI 01 11 El 01 11 RI 01 01 CI 01 1411 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE °A° LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Monterey Ave at I-10 C.L. Palm Desert N'ly Varner Rd 0.1 mi .00 (mi) 76 (ft)/ 90 (ft) Realign/Add W.bound ramps, Widen Varner Rd, and Install traffic signal at WB ramp. City of Palm Dessert is the lead agency. New Chicago Ave Alto Dr Acacia Ave .13 (mi) 16 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon surface and widen road Old State Hwy Green Ave .61 (mi) Resurf AC paved road delayed SH 74 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) delayed 4 3 3 Total 301 10 other 9137 Total 9147 300 205 other 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 Total 205 300 497 other Total 497 DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl A01— ,. 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 E1 RI Cl 01 01 300 Measure A/Western DI E1 R1 01 Cl 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 OI 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 O 01 01 0 Outrigger Dr 73rd Ave .06 (mi) Reconst RMS paved road Galley Dr 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) camp( Q+ad 4 301 31 other Total 31 Pachea Trail Area 4 various roads 1.41 (mi) (ft) / (ft) Resurf AC paved roads Pachea Trail, Big Springs Ranch Rd, 011a Rd & Pageant Pl. d_e.(ayed 3 300 917 other Total 917 Pala Rd Temecula C.L. 1.55 (mi) Recon AC paved road San Diego C.L. 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 D1 11 01 01 01 0 E1 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 291 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 (513. 001 01 01 0 El � 1--70. 01 01 - • 01 . O. R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 865 01 01 01 0' 300 Measure A/Western 300 220 other Total 220 D1 01 11 01 01 0 E1 01 11 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 2181 01 01. 0 300 Measure A/Western Palamino P1 King Ave .09 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 470' E KING AVE , 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) t CowrplmtI& b 4,/30 1 300 33 other Total 33 D1 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01. 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 311 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Palo Verde Area various roads .00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road (ft)/ (ft) 4 Paseo Grande Ontario Ave S'ly Las Posas Rd .16 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Const curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west side Cvmplef-;oy peyd3K1 2 Pats Point Dr Lawson Rd .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 760' NE Lawson Rd 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) to Gompla.i-e- by &/3o 1 Pheasant Hill P1 W'ly Lake St .08 mi E'ly Lake St .09 mi .18 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 3 --v Ga rn p Leta. by 6/3 D Pigeon Pass Rd Hidden Springs Dr Center St 4.80 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 60 (ft) Construct portions and widen to 4 lanes The Transportation Dept. is seeking additional funds needed. %H aGt: J2 5 Pine Cove Rd SH 243 .44 (mi) Resurf AC paved road W'ly 0.44 mi SH 243 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) comp' e� 3 Port Cir Barnacle Dr .10 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly Barnacle Dr .1 mi 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Gonipref-a-cd 4 Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000. D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 302 750 other Total 750 300 35 other 83 Total 118 300 54 other Total 54 300 45 other Total 45 300 15 other Total 15 300 229 other Total 229 301 26 other Total 26 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 2001 1801 1801 190 302 Measure A/Palo Verde DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 351 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 521 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 431 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 151 Oj 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 2271 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 241 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 13 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Portola Ave I-10 Interchange Between Monterey Av IC Cook St IC (ft)/ (ft) .00 (mi) Const new interchange City of Palm Desert is lead agency. o✓19Ci rt/ Rainbow Canyon Rd Frontage Rd / N .66 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road San Diego C.L. 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Rancho California Anza Rd (mi) Const roundabout (ft)/ G_o_cyrAlat�f . . (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 4 301 30 other 71393 Total 71423 3 300 97 other Total 97 3 300 250 other 40 Total 290 300 20 other Total 20 5 300 2 other 13 Total 15 1 300 65 other Total 65 2 300 62 other 88 Total 150 Rebel Ct 5 Banner St E'ly Banner St .06 mi .06 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road comp; lated Reche Vista Dr / Reche Canyon Rd Heacock St San Bernardino Co.Line 5.23 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 86 (ft) Realign 1.3 miles and widen to 4 lanes Finish Engineering report only. Rider St Haines St/S .28 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Brown St 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) tp comp(e_tR_ by 10/3a River Rd Bridge Santa Ana River .12 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Bridge Replacement 80% in the City of Eastvale, 20% in the City of Norco. 7� v cvro l II 4/3 A 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 D1 E1 RI CI 101 01 01 01 101 o1 01 01 101 01 01 0I 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 D1 01 11 El 01 11 RI 01 01 Cl 01 • 951 306 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 D1 01 El 01 R1 01 Cl 2501 01 01 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 0.1 OI 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 D1 11 01 E1 11 01 R1 01 01 Cl 181 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 D1 21 Of E1 01 01 RI 01 01 Cl 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 D1 21 01 01 E1 11 01 01 R1 01 01 01 Cl 621 OI 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 DI 01 01 El 01 01 R1 01 01 CI 621 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EN (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Riverside County Bridge Maintenance Program 3 Various locations Countywide .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds Rudell Rd Ontario Ave W'ly 0.23 mi .23 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road c(e/aYee/ uwf uPd«ted 5Gope. 2 Total 300 446 other Total A46 300 41 Sage Rd - 2 segments Red Mnt Rd Nly Red Mnt Rd .62 mi .80 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Reconst AC paved road Segment 2 is S'ly E. Benton Rd 0.11 mi to N'ly E. Benton Rd 0.07 mi. Rd Bk Pg 127 --._.... de/aye-el 3 other Total 41 300 740 other San Miguelito Dr Ramon Rd .25 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 4 La Canada Wy 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) _-o. Gompbafe- by 6/3ZI 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 D 10I p4TZ� T E1 151 01 R1 01 01 Cl 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 31 Js7 01 E1 01 01 RI 01 01 Cl ` 0A 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 Total 740 301 51 other DI 951 01 01 01 0 E1 51 01 01 01 0 Fil DI 01 01 0 91 0 640J}—=' 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 51 San Timoteo Cyn Rd W Railroad X-ing1.39mi 2.30 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Beaumont. C.L. 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) _ . dela y e d 5 91 21 01 01 E1 11 01 01 R1 01 01 01 CI 431 01 01 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 01. 0 01 0. 01 0 01 0 300 BOO other Total BOO D1 601 y 01 01 01 0 El 1 01 01 01 0 R1 0 1 01 01 0 Cl 01 73901 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Scour Critical Bridges 4 .09 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Develop 'Plans of Action' for 2 bridges 32nd Avenue and 35th Avenue Bridges over the Palo Verde Channel 300 41 other 40 Total 81 D1 391 21 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Seahorse Way Barnacle Dr .11 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Port Cir 31 (ft) / 31 (ft) _Cov”.lefe.d 4 301 26 other Total 26 D1 11 01 01 01 0 E1 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 241 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Sharp Rd 3049' W Theda St .58 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Theda St • 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) co�.p._l.dt�ecl 1 Speed Warning Signs 5 Various Locations .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Install solar -powered speed feedback signs Cajalco Rd, E1 Sobrante Rd, Van Buren Blvd, Soboba Rd and San Timoteo Cyn Rd. e,i4 1.1 1 Spring St Sharp Dr .31 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Club Dr 24 (ft) / 24 (ft) _ GovrtplQ+ed 1 Stallion P1 445' W King Ave .08 (mi) Resurf AC paved road King Avenue 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) to Co kola l,xf et toy /o/3 a 1 Stallion P1 King Ave .09 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 455' E King Ave 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) fo Gov��121¢ bq /0/30 1 Sunset Tr 258' E Saddleback Rd .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 489' W Saddleback Rd 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) _to co wi p (24-0- 6 N in /3 a 1 Suttles Dr Rancho Escondido Dr .16 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Tava Ln 27 (ft)/ 27 .(ft) ._to complefe by 4730 1 Fund Source Amount x $1000 Total 300 94 other Total 94 300 62 other 465 Total 527 300 52 other Total 52 300 29 other Total 29 300 32 other Total 32 300 53 other Total 53 300 51 ' other Total 51 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 12/13 1 13/14 j 14/15 j 15/16 j 16/17 Dj tj Oj Oj Oj 0 El 11 Oj Oj Oj 0 Rj Oj Oj Oj Oj 0 CI 021 Oj 01 Oj 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 11 El 11 11 Rj 51 51 cj 01 of 300 Measure A/Western of Oj of 481 Dj ij Oj Oj Oj 0 El 11 01 Oj Oj 0 Rj Oj 01 01 Oj 0 Cj 501 01 Oj Oj 0 300 Measure A/Western Dj ij Oj Oj Oj 0 El 1j Oj Oj Oj 0 Rj Oj 01 01 Oj 0 CI 271 Oj Oj Oj 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 Oj 01 0 El 11 01 Oj 01 0 RI Oj 01 Oj 01 0 CI 301 Oj Oj 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Dj ij Oj Oj Or 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 511 01 Oj Oj 0 300 Measure A/Western DI ij 01 01 Oj 0 El ij 01 01 Oj 0 Rj 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 491 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE °A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Tava Ln King Ave .11 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 568' E King Ave 41 (ft)/ 41 (ft) cx.implete by 4/34) 1 Total 300 other 12/13 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 Total 50 50 D1 11 01 El 11 01 R1• 01 01 C( 481 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 Tenaja Rd Clinton Keith Rd 1.52 (mi) Reconst AC paved road Sierra Ellena 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 1 300 other Total 621 621 DI 311 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 5901 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Trimero Cir Circle B Dr .08 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 4 301 other Total 34 34 DI 01 11 01 01 0 El 01 11 01 01 0 R( 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 321 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Valley Wy SR 60 .35 (mi) Const new EB ramps (ft)/ (ft) _Comp te.¢eel 2 300 other Total 18 22 40 D1 01 01 01 01 0 E( 01 01 01 01 0 R( 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 181 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Van Buren Blvd Washington St Wood Rd 2.10 (mi) 62 (ft)/110 (ft) Widen AC paved road to 6 lanes. o(efayBd 1 300 other Total 93 5678 5771 Van Buren Blvd Clay St Santa Ana River Bridge .15 (mi) 50 (ft)/ 72 (ft) Widening to add turning lanes Recon CGS. Match width at N'ly end of B00801 improvements. Widen NB and SB frontage improve - 2 300 other Total 441 100 541 D1 521 21 01 01 0 El 391 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 4411 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Van Buren Blvd Bridges Santa Ana River .10 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Replace existing bridges in cooperation with the City of Riverside. In the City of Jurupa Valley. 090 09 2 300 other Total 860 7891 8751 D1 01 01 El 01 01 R1 01 01 Cl 8601 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 17 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Via Santiago Meadow Wood St .48 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 2 Frontage Rd 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) ..To Comp Ia_t¢ by 6/3b Vineland St Edgar Canyon Channel .01 (mi) Construct box culvert 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 5 Vista Grande Dr Circle B Dr .06 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road NW'ly & SE'ly 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 4 Vista Moree Ct Lake St SE'ly Lake St .08 mi .08 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road *'a Complete: by 4p/37> 3 Washington St Tava Ln 1.60 (mi) Resurf AC paved road This road received an B6-0565. Hermosa Dr(City Limit) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) interim overlay under 1 Watkins Dr I-215 .17 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Riverside C.L. 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 5 Westbrook Dr Garden Dr .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'ly Garden Dr .12 mi 33 (ft) / 33 (ft) _.. Govil74latad 5 Total 300 169 other Total 169 300 570 other Total 570 301 35 other Total 35 300 21 other Total 21 300 1303 other Total 1303 300 157 other Total 157 300 33 other Total 33 12/13 j 13/14 j 14/15 j 15/16 1 15/17 Oj Oj Oj 0 Oj Oj Oj 0 Oj Oj Oj 0 Oj Oj Oj 0 300 Measure A/Western DI Oj 751 Ej Oj 151 RI of of cj of of Oj' of of 480j 300 Measure A/Western of of of of 0 0 0 0 DI of 11 of El DI 11 01 RI of of of CI Oj 331 Oj 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 DI 11 of of Ej 11 Oj Oj RI Oj Oj Oj CI 191 Oj. Oj 300 Measure A/Western of of of 01 0 0 0 0 DI El RI cj 300 Measure A/Western of of of of 0 0 0 0 DI Oj 301 Oj El of 31 of RI Oj Oj 01 Cl Oj 1241 Oj 300 Measure A/Western of of 01 of 0 0 0 0 DI 11 of El ij of RI of of CI 311 Oj 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Whittier Ave Yale St Cornell St .50 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Const sidewalk on S'ly side W. of Columbia and on N side E of Columbia. SB-821 segment is W. of Columbia. Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 3 300 67 12/13 f 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 other 583 Total 650 /9 0l 01 01 151 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 0) 01 0 01 01 0 Worsley Rd Dillon Rd 2.63 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Pierson Blvd 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 5 301 219 other Total 219 D1 01 01 01 01 O El 01 11 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 2181 01 OJ 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley z* Future Projects District 1 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 1 300 300 other 3926 Total 4226 DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 01 01 300 300 Measure A/Western z* Future Projects District 2 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 2 300 1250 other 1800 Total 3050 D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 111 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 01 01 7501 500 300 Measure A/Western z* Future Projects District 3 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 3 300 3300 other 5051 Total 8351 D1 01 01 01 01 0 E! 01 .01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 01 01 16001 1700 300 Measure A/Western z* Future Projects District 4 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 4 301 2700 other 9800 Total 12500 DI 01 01 Oj 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 3001 8001 8001 800 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley z* Future Projects District 5 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 5 300 2850 other 3350 Total 6200 D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 6001 9001 1350 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2013-2017 Page 19 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 09/25/2012 Fund Source Source Nme Fiscal Year (Amt x $1000) Fund Source Total Expenditure 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 (Amt x $1000) 300 Measure A/Western 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 302 Measure A/Palo Verde * Grand Totals * 11865 7376 6427 3250 3700 32618 3641 1006 1210 1200 1350 6407 1437 202 180 180 190 2189 18943 8584 7817 4630 5240 43214 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Pagel RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Fund Source Legend: 300 = Western County, 301 = Coachella Valley, 302 = Palo Verde Valley Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 1 17/18 21st Ave 4 W Circle B Dr 0.02 mi E Circle B Dr 0.02 mi .04 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 301 other Total 12 12 D1 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 101 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 66th Ave Harrison St (old SH86) .00 (mi) Install Traffic Signal (ft) / (ft) 4 301 other Total 431 240 671 DI 01 01 01 01 0 E) 01 01 01 01 0 R) 01 01 01 01 0 CI 4311 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 70th Ave 2220' W Lincoln St . 47 (mi) Reconst RMS paved road 4699' W Lincoln St 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 301 other Total 313 313 D1 21 01 01 01 D El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 3101 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Alessandro Ave S'ly Cypress 0.02 mi . 79 (mi) Grind and Resurf Ramona Expy 20 (ft) / 20 (ft) 3 300 other Total 507 507 DI 351 01 01 01 0 El. 21 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 4701 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Apache Tr/ I-10 Interchange Seminole Dr Main St .20 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Const Roundabouts at 2 off/on ramp intersections keep open for FY12-13. Final project close-out working with Cal -Trans. 5 300 other Total 7 7 D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 51 01 01 01 0 Cl 21 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Arrowhead Blvd N'ly 14th Ave 0.04, mi .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road I-10 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 4 302 other Total Avenida Florencita Camino Aventura Camino Campanero .50 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Const curb, gutter & sidewalk on east side 4 301 other Total 180 180 DI 01 351 01 01 0 El 01 11 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 1441 01 01 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 114 153 267 DI 101 01 01 01 0 E) 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 1041 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Bennett Rd Dillon Rd 1.12 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 1.12 mi 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Briggs Rd & Baxter Rd .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Loan Payback for road improvements built under project C2-0156. Agenda 3.24 3/20/12. $180k/yr x 4 years after construction finish. Cabazon Area Resurfacing Group 13 Various Streets 3.65 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved road See included list at end of district section. Camino del Sol Area Group 2 3 Area Streets .24 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved road The project is to finish work on 3 streets re- maining from project X1106 due to high ground Cascadia Dr Cecina Way .10 (mi) Reconst AC paved road Carter Ln 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Cecina Way 41st Ave .10 (mi) Recon AC paved road Cascadia Drive 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Chico Cir Circle B Dr .03 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road NW'ly 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 4 301 other Total 3 300 other Total 5 300 other Total 1 300 other Total 4 301 other Total 4 301 other Total 4 301 other Total 13/14 114/15 115/16 116/17 117/18 187 187 DI 11 OI 01 OI 0 El 11 OI OI OI 0 RI OI OI OI OI 0 CI 1851 OI 01 OI 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 720 720 DI OI OI OI OI 0 El OI OI OI OI 0 R4 OI OI OI OI 0 CI 1801 1801 1801 180I 0 300 Measure A/Western 1754 1754 DI El RI CI 301 1621 OI OI 0 51 BI OI OI 0 OI OI OI OI 0 01 15491 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western 154 154 DI 401 OI 01 OI 0 El OI OI OI OI 0 RI OI OI OI OI 0 CI 1141 OI OI OI 0 300 Measure A/Western 53 53 DI 11 OI OI OI 0 El 11 OI OI OI 0 RI OI OI OI OI 0 CI 511 OI OI OI 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 51 51 DI El RI CI 11 OI OI OI 0 11 OI OI OI 0 OI OI OI OI 0 491 OI OI OI 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 18 18 DI 11 OI OI oI 0 El 11 OI OI OI 0 RI OI OI OI OI 0 CI 161 OI OI OI 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Chuckwalla Vly Rd 33475' SE Corn Springs 2.00 (mi) Reconst RMS paved road 22612' W Graha■ Pass 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Cienega P1 Cascadia Dr .04 (mi) Reconst AC paved road 227' S Cascadia Dr 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Cliff St Adams St .12 (mi) Reconst AC paved road 618' E Adams 24 (ft) / 24 (ft) Coachella Valley Area various roads 6.00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley Contreras Rd Johnson Rd .49 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S.H. 371 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) De Portola Rd E. Benton Rd .18 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E. Benton Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Delta St Adams St .12 (mi) Recon AC paved road 623' E Adams St 24 (ft) / 24 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 4 302 607 other Total 607 4 301 24 other Total 24 4 301 62 other Total 62 4 301 2100 other Total 2100 3 300 327 other Total 327 3 300 26 other Total 26 4 301 63 other Total 63. 13/1.4 1 14/15 1 15/16 ( 16/17 1 17/18 D) 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 o R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 0041 01 01 01 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 221 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 601 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI 01 01 01 0l 0 El 01 01 01 0l 0 RI 01 0l 0p 01 0 Ci 0l 600l 5001 5001 500 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 3251 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 261 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI _ 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 0' 01 01 01 0 CI 611 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Dune Lake St Adams St .12 (mi) Reconst AC paved road 618' E Adams St 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) E1 Sobrante Rd Cajalco Rd 5.00 (mi) Recon AC paved road Mc Allister Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Emerald Crest Dr Washington St .24 (mi) Reconst AC paved road Yucca Lane 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Evelyn Way Stetson Ave .09 (mi) Reconst AC paved road Frances St 29 (ft) / 29 (ft) Frances Ln Evelyn Wy San Jacinto St .12 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Reconst AC paved road Frontage Rd Rainbow Canyon Rd / N .67 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road San Diego C.L. 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Gilman Springs Rd Alessandro Blvd .00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 42 (ft) Constr L.turn pocket on Gilman Springs Rd Coordinate w/ City of Moreno Valley Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x MOO D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 4 301 62 other Total 62 1 300 3240 other Total 3240 4 301 68 other Total 68 3 300 17 other Total 17 3 300 27 other Total 27 3 300 113 other Total 113 5 300 433 other Total 433 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 1 17/18 D1 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 601 DI DI DI D 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 01 2251 01 01 0 El 01 51 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 30101 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 it 01 01 01 0 E1 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 661 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 01 01 01 01 0 E1 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 171 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 271 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 it 01 01 01 0 E1 11 GI 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 O1 0 Cl 1111 GI 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 4331 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 13/14 1 14/15 ( 15/16 1 16/17 1 17/18 Grant St 2 300 117 Indiana Ave Magnolia Ave .23 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Const curb, gutter 8 sidewalk on SW side other 151 from S'ly Harlow to Indiana Ave, and on both sides from Magnolia Ave to Tolton Ave. Total 268 DI 91 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 1081 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Hayes St 4 301 333 70th Ave 68th Ave 1.01 (mi) 23 (ft)/ 23 (fit) Reconst RMS paved road other Total 333 DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 3301 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Indian Truck Tr Interchange 1 300 255 I-15 .20 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 87 (ft) Widen I.T.Trl, Ichg ramps and const signals other Total 255 DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 2551 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Johnson Rd 3 300 259 Contreras Rd Hill St .51 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total 259 D) 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 C) 2571 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Lake St 3 300 71 Thornton Ave S'lyChambers Av .56 mi .83 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total 71 DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 C) 711 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Leon Rd 3 300 733 Keller Rd Scott Rd 1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Adjust AC road profile other 570 Half in City of Menifee Total 1303 DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 7331 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Lincoln St 4 301 999 7th St 62nd Ave 1.61 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total 999 DI 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 04 0 CI 9991 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 6 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Marcella Ln Evelyn Wy .12 (mi) Reconst AC paved road San Jacinto St 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Mesa Rd Calle Campo .60 (mi) Reconst AC paved road De Portola Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Mitchell Rd Bautista Rd 1.43 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Regal Blue Tr 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 3 300 27 other Total 27 3 300 244 other Total 244 3 300 376 other Total 376 300 143 other Total 143 4 301 5 other Total 5 3 300 205 other Total 205 3 300 497 other Total 497 Mitchell Rd 3 Kirby Rd W'ly Bohlen Rd 0.11 mi .57 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Monterey Ave at I-10 C.L. Palm Desert N'ly Varner Rd 0.1 mi .00 (mi) 76 (ft)/ 90 (ft) Realign/Add W.bound ramps, Widen Varner Rd, and Install traffic signal at WB ramp. City of Palm Dessert is the lead agency. New Chicago Ave Alto Dr Acacia Ave .13 (mi) 16 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon surface and widen road Old State Hwy Green Ave .61 (mi) Resurf AC paved road SH 74 25 (ft) / 25 (ft) 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 1 17/18 D1 of 01 01 E1 01 01 01 R1 01 01 01 Cl 271 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 D1 E1 R1 Cl 01 01 01 2441 01 01 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 01 11 01 01 E1 11 01 01 R1 01 01 01 Cl 3741 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 o1 01 0 0 0 0 D1 11 El 11 R1 01 Cl 1411 01 01 01 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 D1 01 01 01 E1 01 01 01 R1 01 01 01 Cl 51 01 01 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 01 211 01 01 E1 21 01 01 R1 01 01 01 Cl 01 1821 01 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 D1 351 01 El 21' 01 R1 01 01 Cl 01. 4601 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 1 17/18 Pachea Trail Area 4 various roads 1.41 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved roads Pachea Trail, Big Springs Ranch Rd, 011a Rd 8 Pageant Pl. 3 300 other Total 917 917 DI 501 01 01 01 0 El 21 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI B551 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Pala Rd Temecula C.L. 1.55 (mi) Recon AC paved road San Diego C.L. 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 300 other Total 220 220 D( 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 2181 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Palo Verde Area various roads .00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road (ft)/ (ft) 4 302 other Total 870 870 D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 1801 2201 2301 240 302 Measure A/Palo Verde Pheasant Hill P1 W' ly Lake St .06 mi .18 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'ly Lake St .09 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 3 300 other Total 13 13 D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 131 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Portola Ave I-10 Interchange Between Monterey Av IC Cook St IC .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Const new interchange City of Palm Desert is lead agency. 4 301 other Total 20 70793 • 70813 D( 101 101 01 01 0 E( 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Rainbow Canyon Rd Frontage Rd / N .66 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road San Diego C.L. 31 (ft) / 31 (ft) 3 300 other Total 97 97 D1 11 0( 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R( 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 951 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western Riverside County Bridge Maintenance Program 3 Various locations Countywide .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds 300 other Total 260 260 D1 2601 01 01 01 0 E( 01 01 01 01 0 R( 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) SW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Rudell Rd Ontario Ave W'ly 0.23 mi .23 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Reconstruct AC paved road Sage Rd - 2 segments Red Mnt Rd Nly Red Mnt Rd .62 mi .80 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Reconst AC paved road Segment 2 is S'ly E. Benton Rd 0.11 mi to N'ly E. Benton Rd 0.07 mi. Rd Bk Pg 127 San Timoteo Cyn Rd W Railroad X-ing1.39mi 2.30 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Beaumont C.L. 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Scour Critical Bridges .09 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Develop 'Plans of Action' for 2 bridges 32nd Avenue and 35th Avenue Bridges over the Palo Verde Channel Speed Warning Signs 5 Various Locations .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Install solar -powered speed feedback signs Cajalco Rd, E1 Sobrante Rd, Van Buren Blvd, Soboba Rd and San Timoteo Cyn Rd. Tenaja Rd Clinton Keith Rd 1.52 (mi) Reconst AC paved road Sierra Ellena 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Trimero Cir Circle B Dr .O8 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 2 300 418 other Total 418 3 300 740 other Total 740 5 300 800 other Total 800 4 300 2 other 8 Total 10 1 300 55 other 449 Total 504 1 300 590 other Total 590 4 301 34 other Total 34 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 1 17/18 DI 151 El 01 RI 01 CI 4031 01 01 01 0 01 01 01 0 01 01. 01 0 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 951 01 01 01 0 El 51 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 6401 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 601 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 7391 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 21 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 RI 51 01 01 01 0 CI 01 481 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 01 01 01 0f 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 5901 01 01 01 0 300.Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 EI 11 01 01 01 0 RI 01 01 01 01 0 CI 321 01 01 0f 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (fit)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Van Buren Blvd Washington St Wood Rd 2.10 (mi) 62 (ft)/110 (ft) Widen AC paved road to 6 lanes Vineland St Edgar Canyon Channel .01 (mi) Construct box culvert 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Vista Grande Dr Circle B Dr .08 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road NW'ly 8 SE'ly 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Washington St Tava Ln Hermosa Dr(City Limit) 1.60 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road This road received an interim overlay under 66-0565. Watkins Dr I-215 .17 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Riverside C.L. 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Whittier Ave Yale St Cornell St .50 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Const sidewalk on S'ly side W. of Columbia and on N side E of Columbia. SB-821 segment is W. of Columbia. Worsley Rd Dillon Rd 2.63 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Pierson Blvd 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 1 300 91 other 5678 Total 5769 5 300 570 other Total 570 4 301 35 other Total 35 1 300 1303 other Total 1303 5 300 157 other Total 157 3 300 44 other 525 Total 569 5 301 219 other Total 219 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/16 1 16/17 1 17/18 DI 521 01 01 01 0 El 391 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 751 01 01 01 0 El 151 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 4801 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western DI 11 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 91 01 01 01 0 Cl 331 01 01 01 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley DI El RI Cl 1201 31 01 01 01 01 01 11801 300 Measure A/Western 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 01 0 DI 301 01 01 01 0 El 31 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 1241 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 191 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 251 01 01 01 0 300 Measure A/Western D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 11 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 2181 01 01 01 ' 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (fit)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist z* Future Projects District 2 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. z* Future Projects District 3 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. z* Future Projects District 4 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. z* Future Projects District 5 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 2 300 1550 other 1801 Total 3351 3 300 5800 other 5051 Total 10851 4 301 4600 other 9801 Total 14401 5 300 5600 other 3351 Total 9151 13/14 1 14/15 1 15/15 1 16/17 1 17/18 D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 01 7001 850 300 Measure A/Western D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 Cl 01 01 14001 21001 2300 300 Measure A/Western D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 11001 11001 12001 1200 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D1 01 01 01 01 0 El 01 01 01 01 0 R1 01 01 01 01 0 CI 01 6001 13001 19501 1950 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2014-2018 Page 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 05/09/2013 Fund Source Source Nme Fiscal Year (Ant x $1000) Fund Source Total Expenditure 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 (Amt x $1000) 300 Measure A/Western 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 302 Measure A/Palo Verde * Grand Totals * 6829 6928 5790 4780 4950 29277 3093 1710 1700 1850 1850 10203 609 360 220 230 240 1659 10531 8998 7710 6860 7040 41139 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013, Revised June 4, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1* De Anza Dr Street Impts Pavement rehab, concrete improvements 450 62 2012 Complete San Jacinto Avenue/Ramona 2 Expressway Sidewalk Sidewalk 100 50 2013 Complete 3 Warren Road Pavement Rehab. 1200 33 2014 In Design 4** Ramona Exp., east of Lake Park Pavement Rehab. 300 4 2014 In Design 2013/2014 Bid Opening June 5 Lake Park Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Desing 300 200 2013 6 Eagle Road New Alignment 1000 800 2015/2016 On -going TOTALS 3,350 1,149 * Part of ongoing City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation **This is a phase of the Ramona Expressway Pavement Rehabilitatoin and Widening (Sanderson to Esplanade) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 2,800,000.00 / Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: 684,000.00 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 3,484,000.00 OLf/ Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 1 Traffic Control Devices/Studies Traffic Control Impts 150 25 Ramona Ex Pavement Rehab (Lake Park 300 250 2 to Esplanade) Pvmt Rehab 3 Warren Rd Pavement Rehab Pvmt Rehab 1,200 1,200 4 Lake Park Bridge, Mountain Avenue Bridge Bridge Structural Work 9 300 200 Rehab. 5 Miscellaneous Downtown Pavement Rehab. Pavement Rehab, Widening 1,000 500 TOTALS 2,950 2,175 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 1,309,000.00 705,000.00 2,014,000.00 0 (V Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Lyon Ave/Ramona Blvd Widening and Improvements Street widening, curb & gutter, sidewalk 800 500 2 State Street, Ramona Blvd. to South Pavement Rehab 500 500 City Limit San Jacinto Avenue Between Main 500 110 3 to Menlo Pavement Rehab TOTALS 1,800�' 1,110 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 904,000.00 / Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: 726,000.00 ✓ / Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 1,630,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Eagle Rd Realignment Road Realignment, Paving 1,000 800 2 Downtown Rehab. Pavement Rehab. 700 500 TOTALS 1,70, 1,300 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 330,000.00 748, 000.00 1, 078, 000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 Paving Rehabilitation and Minor Widening 1,000 1,000 City Wide Paving TOTALS 1,000 1,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 28, 2013, Revised June 4, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 78,000.00 770,000.00 848,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Cottonwood Ave Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 1,250 448 2 Esplanade Avenue between State & Pavement Rehab 600 400 Sanderson TOTALS 1,850 848 FY 2013-14 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of San Jacinto (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $156,391, approved by the Conunission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 28, 2013 CITY MANAGER Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF TEMECULA FIVE-YEAR CIP 2014-2018 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 12/13 i City of Temecula Department of Public Works 41000 Main Street ■ Temecula, CA 92590 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 ■ Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Phone (951) 694-641 1 ■ Fax (951) 694-6475 ■ www cityoftemecula.org May 7, 2013 Shirley Medina, Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92502-2208 o ECG E [IMEr) MAY 13 2013 ' �J TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Re: FY2014-2018 Measure 'A' Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Medina; Attached is the City of Temecula's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Measure 'A' funds, including our Project Status Report. The City's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement is also enclosed for your review and approval. All of the projects submitted are included in the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program, scheduled for approval by City Council at their regular meeting ofJune 11, 2013. If any changes are incorporated subsequent to this session, a revised five-year plan will be submitted to you. If you require any additional information, please contact me at (951) 506-5168. Sincerely, G reg )butler Direc or of Public Works/City Engineer Enclosures cc: Jennifer Hennessy - Director of Finance Rudy Graciano — Revenue Manager. Printed on Recycled Paper R:\CIP DIVISION \ STAFF UuIieD\ PUB WKS\MeasureAI3-17coverltr&MOE.jcd.doc FY 2013/14 MANTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Temecula (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure "A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,431,799, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 7, 2013 Sr„ Aaron Adams, Interim City Manager Attest: Susan W. Jon:_ MC, City Clerk RACIP DIVISION\STAFFUuIieD\PUBWKS\MeasureA13-17coverltr&MOE.jcd.doc RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Temecula Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Interim Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013-2014 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2013-2014 Projects: 5,087 2,429 7,516 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 8,977 6,054 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Farilitieq 1,462 1,462 TOTALS 10,439 7,516 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Temecula Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Interim Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 0 2,502 2,502 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 4,800 1,020 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Farilities 1,000 1,000 TOTALS 5,800 2,020 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Temecula Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Interim Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 482 2,577 3,059 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 4,800 1,025 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,000 1,000 TOTALS 5,800 2,025 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Temecula Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Interim Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 1,034 2,654 3,688 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction 8 Rehabilitation 4,800 1,030 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC 8 AC Repairs, Street 8 ROW Maintenance of Drainage Farilitips 1,000 1,000 TOTALS 5,800 2,030 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 Agency: City of Temecula Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Interim Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 30, 2013 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 1,658 2,734 4,392 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 4,800 1,034 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Fanilitiaa 1,000 1,000 TOTALS 5,800 2,034 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Temecula Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Interim Management A Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 30, 2013 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 French Valley Parkway/I-15 Overcrossing & Interchange Improvements - Phase I Study, Process, Design & Construct S/B off -ramp 28,974 1,722 Mar-12 Design completed Mar 2012 - Construction began June 2012 and due to be completed December 2013 2 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 9,121 5,737 Annual pavement rehabilitation oroaram On -going annual pavement rehabilitation 3 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,462 1,068 Annual right -of- way maintenance On -going annual ROW maintenance TOTALS 39,557 8,527 • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort Base Year Approval for City of Wildomar BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year level for the city of Wildomar (Wildomar). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies in order to receive local streets and roads funds. The 2009 Measure A ordinance continued the requirement for local agencies to maintain the current commitment of local discretionary expenditures toward transportation construction and maintenance activities. This requirement is to ensure that Measure A funds supplement current expenditures, not supplant. In accordance with the 2009 Measure A ordinance, if local agencies do not meet their respective MOE base year level in a given year, Measure A Local Streets and Roads disbursements will be withheld the following year. At its July 2010 meeting, the Commission approved the MOE guidelines developed by staff and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The guidelines also indicated the implementation of the 2009 MOE base year levels would be applicable to FY 201 1 /12. For the first two years of the 2009 Measure A program for FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/1 1, the Commission approved the use of the 1989 Measure A MOE base year amounts, or the Proposition 42 MOE amount for cities incorporated in or after 1989. Agenda Item 9B 170 The 2009 Measure A MOE annual certification process is as follows: Local agencies complete the MOE report template to include discretionary general fund expenditures for construction and maintenance activities for the reporting year. • General ledger documentation/forms must be submitted as an attachment to the MOE report template. • MOE reports will be submitted to the Commission's auditor. • Commission staff will report to the TAC and Commission regarding the outcome of the auditor's findings regarding agencies meeting the MOE base year levels. • Local agencies that do not meet the MOE base year may submit a request for special consideration, which will be presented to the Commission. Wildomar prepared the 2009 MOE calculation, based on discretionary general fund expenditures for transportation related construction and maintenance activities that occurred in FY 2011 /12. The MOE guidelines pertaining to newly incorporated cities require those cities to determine their respective MOE base year levels after the third year of incorporation. Staff recommends approval of the MOE base year of $22,100, as indicated in the attachment. Attachment: FY 2011 /12 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures for Wildomar Agenda Item 9B 171 4DY 2011/12 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures Round to nearest dollar) • Funding Breakdown Project Expenditures Included in General Ledger Total Cost General Fund Meas A Federal State "• City Funds """ Other " Construction: BUNDY CANYON IMPROVEMENTS $ 97,055.00 CLINTON KEITH / 1-15. $ 32,754.00 BUNDY CANYON /SCOTT ROAD $ 370.00 SAFE SIDEWALKS TO SCHOOLSPHASEI $ 294,655.00 SAFE SIDEWALKS TO SCHOOLS PHASE II $ 11,321.00 LED LIGHT REPLACEMENT $ 128,833.00 HIDDEN SPRINGS / CLINTON KEITH RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL $ 2,726.00 Maintenance: STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR $ 261,218.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE + ELECTRICITY $ 40,559.00 ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS ROADWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 5 22,890.00 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM $ 105,800.00 UNPAVED ROADWAY $ 9,200.00 $ 2,041.00 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM $ 75,339.00 STREET LIGHTS $ 22,100.00 $ 61,322.00 Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to specific Projects: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION $ 34,908.00 $ ,290,140.00 OTHER (MISC ADMIN, TRAFFIC COUNTS, TLMA SLF) Deductions for Special Consideration (Deductions Must Also Be Included in Project Expenditures Above): 22,348.00 Total Project Cost General Fund State Reason Why Project Expenditure Should Be Deducted from MOE Construction: Maintenance: Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to specific Pro ects: MOE.Base Ykar,E_ €f° ` OTHER COLUMN INCLUDES GAS TAX EXPENDITURES `• STATE FUNDS INCLUDE TDA, SR2S, AQMD "" CITY FUNDS INCLUDE LLM&D, CSA's • r • t 10, - 01. 'I' • " 1 -1911T11r , t • . r t iv L. 4' 4 14 r RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement with CH2M Hill to Complete the Final Project Report and Environmental Document for the State Route 79 Realignment Project WESTERN RIVERS/DE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 02-31-043-08, Amendment No. 8 to Agreement No. 02-31-043-00, with CH2M Hill to complete the Final Environmental Impact Report/Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIR/FEIS) and project report for the SR-79 realignment project for a amount not to exceed • $4,494,074; 2) Authorize the Chair, or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute amendments for non -cardinal changes to the scope of work up to a maximum contingency amount of $450,000 for a total amount not to exceed $31,742,166 (includes original contract and previous amendments of a contract value of $26,798,092); and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute non -funding agreements for the environmental clearance and design of the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The SR-79 realignment project proposes to realign SR-79 between Domenigoni Parkway and Gilman Springs Road in the Hemet/San Jacinto Valley. The realignment will improve regional and local mobility by providing a shorter, more direct, north -south route. In addition, the realigned highway will provide more separation between regional and local traffic, thereby improving overall traffic flow. Agenda Item 9C 173 Since the last project update to the Commission in December 2012, staff worked with its consultant team and Caltrans to complete all necessary environmental and engineering studies in support of the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement (DEIR/DEIS) approved for public circulation in February 2013. The DEIR/DEIS analyzed multiple alternatives, including the publicly expressed preferences of the affected local agencies. In addition to two build alternatives, the DEIR/DEIS discussed the alternatives that were considered, but that were eliminated from further discussion. Potential project phasing for each build alternative was also discussed. Two public hearings on the project were conducted in March 2013. Additionally, four public information meetings were conducted to more fully engage and inform the public of the project. Contract Amendments At its February 13, 2002 meeting, the Commission approved a contract with CH2M Hill for the development of the project report and environmental document (PR/ED) for a total amount of $2,194,497. Since then, the Commission approved seven contract amendments. Of these seven amendments, only three amendments increased the value of the contract. Amendment No. 1 was for $13,158,654, Amendment No. 5 was for $9,964,941, and Amendment No. 7 was for $1.48 million which brought the current total contract value to $26,798,092. Amendment No. 1, approved by the Commission in January 2005, was to address the resource agencies request that additional build alternatives be included in the environmental document so that several paths through each area would be evaluated. From this request, additional segments and the mid -western alternative (now known as Alternative 2) were added to the project to create a more robust suite of alternatives to broaden the choices available in the alternative selection process and to include several avoidance alternatives to the sensitive vernal pool area. Amendment No. 5, approved by the Commission in April 2007, was necessary to add new tasks to perform the required field studies for the final alignments in the PR/ED documents. This included the continuation of required field studies on the mid -western alternative as well as additional engineering efforts such as geotechnical investigations in the hills south of Florida Avenue, traffic analysis for new construction staging options, additional utility coordination, and multiple environmental and cultural surveys and reports. Amendment No. 7, approved by the Commission in December 2012, was necessary to provide the funds for the completion and finalization of the DEIR/DEIS for public review and comment. Public circulation was a key milestone for the Agenda Item 9C 174 project. As part of the December 2012 action, the Commission requested staff to return in mid 2013, after the public comment period was completed, with a final scope of work and cost estimate to take the SR-79 realignment project through the completion of the environmental phase and record of decision (ROD). Amendments 2, 3, 4, and 6 were administrative amendments to increase the term of the agreement or for reallocation of project tasks. These amendments did not increase the value of the contract. Requested Action Public circulation of the document was a key project milestone; however, significant work still remains to obtain final project approval and completion of the environmental phase. Approximately 200 comments and a petition with 646 signatures were received during the public comment period. Staff and the consultant team are compiling and will be addressing all comments received during the public circulation period. Responses to comments will be included in the FEIR/EIS and will be considered in the preferred alternative selection process. As mentioned in December, it was necessary to get through the public review process and understand the magnitude and number of comments and the resultant additional work, in order to prepare the scope for this amendment. Staff has been working with the consultant team to negotiate the scope, schedule, and cost to complete the final PR/ED approval that will culminate with the California Environmental Quality Act Notice of Determination and National Environmental Policy Act ROD. The major tasks associated with the Amendment No. 8 request are the following: • Reviewing, analyzing, and preparing responses to public comments; • Updating traffic analysis; • Continuation of cultural resources reporting for Section 106; • Preparation of Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis; • Finalizing the project fact sheets; • Minor engineering adjustments on the final alignment once the preferred alternative is selected; and • Final preparation and distribution of the FEIR/EIS and ROD. The full description of the above tasks is in the attached scope of work and cost summary for the SR-79 realignment project that will take the project through the FEIR/EIS and ROD. Agenda Item 9C 175 Staff recommends the Commission approve Amendment No. 8 with CH2M Hill in the amount of $4,494,074, and a maximum contingency amount of $450,000, bringing the total amount not to exceed to $31,742,166. Western County Measure A highway funds are recommended for use for Amendment No. 8. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Amount: $4,000,000 $ 944,074 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Highway Budget Adjustment: No N/A GLA No.: P003003 81 101 210 72 81 101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \14,6,,,,,,,,twij,, Date: 06/12/13 Attachments: 1) Draft Agreement No. 02-31-043-08 21 SR-79 Realignment Project Amendment 8 Scope of Work 3) SR-79 Realignment Project Amendment 8 Cost Proposal 4) SR-79 Realignment Project Amendment 8 Schedule • Agenda Item 9C 176 • • ATTACHMENT 1 Agreement No. 02-31-043-08 AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FEDERAL FUNDING/ASSISTANCE STATE ROUTE 79 RE -ALIGNMENT PROJECT 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No.8 to the Agreement for Professional Services is made and entered into as of this day of , 2013, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 'COMMISSION ("Commission") and CH2M HILL ("Consultant"). 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the ,Consultant have entered into an agreement dated on or about February 13 2002 for the purpose of providing professional engineering "services in connection with the State Route 79 Re -alignment Project (the ""Master "Agreement"). 2.2 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement, dated January 12, 2005, for the purpose of =providing additional; compensation in order to include additional engineering and environmiental studies, and other tasks, required to complete the Project Report and the Environmental Document for the Realignment of State Route Between Domenigoni Parkway and Gilman Springs Road,. and to extend the term of the Master -Agreement. 2.3 The Commission and the Contractor have entered into an Amendment No.2 to the Master Agreement, dated September 16, 2005, for the purpose of !reallocating a portion of the compensation approved for the Services pursuant to Amendment No. 1, amending the Scope of Services, and providing additional compensation for the purpose of including aerial photography and mapping and additional cultural surveys for the Realignment of State Route 79 Project. 2.4 The Commission and the Contractor have entered into an Amendment No.3 to the Master Agreement, dated April 13, 2006, to amend the Scope of Schedule of Services, based on changes in the Project description, and. To provide additional compensation for the purposes of providing RVPUMSHANE\714371.1 1 177 additional biological and cultural resources for survey support, field exploration work and other services for the Realignment of State Route 79 Project. 2.5 The Commission and Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 4 to the Master Agreement, dated March 22, 2007 to amend the Scope and Schedule of Services, based on changes in the Project description, and to provide additional compensation for the purposes of providing additional biological and cultural resources for survey support, field exploration work and other services for the Realignment of State Route 79. 2.6 The Commission and Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 5 to the Master Agreement, dated July 18, 2005 to amend the Scope of Services, to include additional "tasks, to includ.6 a new Schedule of Services, to extend the term of the Master Agreement, and to provide additional compensation all for. the Realignment"of State Route 79 Project. 2.7 The Commission and Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 6 to the Master Agreement, dated March 22,.2010 to extend the term of the Master Agreement for the Realignment of State Route 79 Project. 2.8 The C:ommission.and Consultant- have entered Into an Amendment No. 7 to trib -Master Agreement, dated December. 17, 2012 to extend the term of the Master Agreement for the Realignment of State Route 79 Project. 2,9, The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order to extend the term of the . Master Agreement, revise the Scope of Services, include an additional Schedule of Services, and provide additional co-mpensation for Realignment of State Route 79 Project. 3.1 The term of the Master Agreement shall be extended for an additional term of thirty-six months ending December 31, 2016 unless earlier terminated as provided in the Master Agreement. 3.2 The Scope of Services for the Master Agreement shall be amended to include Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, required to provide Final Project Report and Final Environmental Document, as more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. RV PUB\HSHANE\714371.1 2 • • 178 • 3.3 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment shall be $4,494,074 (Four Million Four Hundred Ninety - Four Thousand Seventy -Four Dollars), as further set forth in Exhibit "B" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1 through 7, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern ,the actions of the parties under this Amendment. RV PUB\HSHANE\714371.1 [Signatures on folltiwing page] 3 179 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FEDERAL FUNDING/ASSISTANCE STATE ROUTE 79 RE -ALIGNMENT PROJECT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY CH2M HILL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Karen S. Spiegel Chair APPROVED AS TO' FOR By: Best, Best & Krieger' General Counse 17336.00000\ 1514236.2 Exhibit A Title 180 • 173 3 6.00000 \ 1514 2 3 6.2 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES [attached behind this page] Exhibit A 181 SR79 A8 Scope Master 05-30-13.docx R V PUB\HSHANE\714236.1 Exhibit 182 • RV PUB\HSHANE\714236.1 EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [attached behind this page] Exhibit 183 SR79 Detailed Schedule Update 060713-rev.pdf RV PUB\HSHANE\7 14236. I Exhibit 184 • RV PUB\HSHANE\714236:1 EXHIBIT "C" . COMPENSATION [attached behind this page; Exhibit • • EXHIBIT "C" COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT For the satisfactory performance and completion of the Services under this Agreement, the Commission will pay the Consultant compensation as set forth herein. 1) ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION. Compensation for the Services will be comprised of the following elements: 1.1 Direct Labor Costs; 1.2 Fixed Fee; and 1.3 Additional Direct Costs. a) DIRECT LABOR COSTS. Direct Labor costs shall be paid in an amount equal to the product of the Direct Salary Costs and the Multiplier which are defined as follows: i) DIRECT SALARY COSTS Direct Salary Costs are the base salaries and wages actually paid to the Consultant's personnel directly engaged in performance of the Services under the Agreement. (The range of hourly rates paid to the Consultant's personnel appears in Section 2..below.) ii) MULTIPLIER The Multiplier to be applied to the Direct Salary Costs to determine the Direct Labor Costs is 1.0 , and is the sum of the following components: (1) (2) Payroll Additives Direct Salary Costs 1.0 included in overhead below The decimal ratio of Payroll Additives to Direct Salary Costs. Payroll Additives include all employee benefits, allowances for vacation, sick leave, and holidays, and company portion of employee insurance and social and retirement benefits, all federal and state payroll taxes, premiums for insurance which are measured by payroll costs, and other contributions and benefits imposed by applicable laws and regulations. 173 36.00000\ 15142 36.2 Exhibit C 186 (3) Overhead Costs 111.71 The decimal ratio of allowable Overhead Costs to the Consultant firm's total direct salary costs. Allowable Overhead Costs include general, administrative and overhead costs of maintaining and operating established offices, and consistent with established firm policies, and as defined in the Federal Acquisitions Regulations, Part 31.2. (4) Profit 9% Total Multiplier FIXED FEE. 308 ;sum of1.1.2f 11.2.2,and 1.1.2.3 multiplied by the'percentage of profit) i) The Fixed Fee as =the Profit as determined in Section 1.1.2.4. The Maximum Fixed Fee; tinder this Agreement is Three Hundred Eight Thousand One Hundred - Ninety Dollars ($308,190) C) ADDITIONAL DIRECT COSTS. Additional Direct Costs directly identifiable to the "performance of the services of this Agreement shall be reimbursed at the rates below, or at actual invoiced cost. Rates for identified Additional Direct Costs are as follows: ITEM Per Diem Car mileage Rental Car Travel Photocopies (Black &White) Photocopies (Color) Photographs/ other reprographic Services Postage/Shipping Courier Service 17336.00000\ 1514236.2 Exhibit C REIMBURSEMENT RATE Actual Cost 0.565 or current IRS rate Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost 187 • Other Rentals, supplies, purchases Actual Cost Travel by air and travel in excess of 200 miles from the Consultant's office nearest to the Commission's office must have the Commission's prior written approval to be reimbursed under this Agreement. 2) DIRECT SALARY RATES Direct Salary Rates, which are the range of hourly rates to be used in determining Direct Salary Costs in Section 1.1.1 above, are given below and are subject to the following: a) Direct Salary Rates shall be applicable to both straight time and overtime work, unless payment of a premium for overtime work is required by law, regulation or craft agreement, or is otherwise specified in this Agreement. In such event, the premium portion of -Direct Salary Costs will not be subject to the Multiplierdefined Paragraph 1.1.2 above. Direct Salary 'Rates shown herein are in, effect'ifor one year following the effective ' date of , the Agreement. Thereafter, they may be adjusted annually to reflect the Consultant's adjustments to individual compensation. The Consultant. shall notify the Commission in writing prior to a change: in the range of rates included herein, and prior to each subsequent change. POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION RANGE OF HOURLY RATES Senior Consultant/Technologist Project Manager Task Manager/Sr. Engineer/Scientist/Planner/Consultant Staff Engineer/Scientist/Planner/Consultant Jr. Engineer/Scientist/Planner/Consultant Staff Technician/CADD Technical Editor Office/Clerical/Accounting 17336.00000\ 1514236.2 Exhibit C $62.38 - $125.05 $62.38 - $125.05 $42.84 - $115.39 $39.47 - $64.21 $24.28 - $47.62 $23.34 - $49.64 $26.22 - $64.21 $15.75 - $47.62 188 c) The above rates are for the Consultant only. All rates for subconsultants to the Consultant will be in accordance with the Consultant's cost proposal INVOICING. a) Each month the Consultant shall submit an invoice for Services performed during the preceding month. The original invoice shall be submitted to the Commission's Executive Director with two (2)`copies to the Commission's Project Coordinator. Charges shall be billed in accordance with the ;terms and rates included herein, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Commission's Representative. Base Work shall be charged separately, ;hand the charges for each task and Milestone listed in the Scope- of Services, shall be listed separately. The charges for each °individual assigned by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be listedseparately on an, attachment to the invoice. A charge of $500 or more for any one item of Additional Direct Costs shall be accompanied by substantiating'; documentation satisfactory to the Commission suchas invoices_, #.elephone logs, etc. Each copy cif eachl invoice shall be accompanied by a Monthly Progress Report and 'spreadsheets showing hours expended by task for each month and,totai project to date.: Each invoice shall indicate payments to DBE subconsultants or supplies by dollar amount and as a. percentage of the total invoice. Each; invoice shall include a certification signed by the Consultant's Representative or an officer of the firm which reads as follows: I hereby certify that the hours and salary rates charged in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the employees listed. Signed Title Date Invoice No. 17336.00000\1514236.2 Exhibit C • 189 • • 4) PAYMENT a) The Commission shall pay the Consultant within four to six weeks after receipt by the Commission of an original invoice. Should the Commission contest any portion of an invoice, that portion shall be held for resolution, without interest, but the uncontested balance shall be paid. b) The final payment for Services under this Agreement will be made only after the Consultant has executed a Release and Certificate of Final Payment. 173 3 6.00000\ 15142 36.2 Exhibit C 190 ATTACHMENT 2 • State Route 79 Project: Domenigoni Parkway to Gilman Springs Road Scope of Services and Cost Proposal for Final Project Report and Final Environmental Document Prepared for Riverside County Transportation Commission May, 30 2013 Submitted by HILL 1770 Iowa Ave, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 191 Contents Task 1.0 Project Management 1 Task 1.1 Project Management 1 Task 1.2 Project Development Team Meetings 2 Task 1.3 Resource Agency Meetings 2 Task 1.4 Other Meetings 2 Task 1.5 Stakeholder Meetings 3 Task 1.6 Progress Reporting and Invoicing 3 Task 1.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 3 Task 1.8 Landowner Access 4 Task 1.9 GIS Data Management 4 Task 1.ES Environmental Streamlining Application 5 Task 1.10 Project Website 5 Task 2.0 NEPA/404 MOU Concurrence Tasks 6 Task 2.1 Purpose and Need 6 Task 2.2 Project Criteria and Alternatives Selection 6 Task 2.3 Updated Project Criteria and Alternatives Selection 6 Task 2.4 Final Agreement: Purpose and Need, Criteria, and Alternatives 6 Task 2.5 LEDPA 6 Task 2.6 Preliminary Agreement of Compliance with Section 404(b)(1) 7 Task 3.0 Engineering 8 Task 3.1 Location Hydraulic Study 8 Task 3.2 Storm Water Data Report 8 Task 3.3 Drainage Studies 8 Task 3.4 Utility Coordination 8 Task 3.5 Geotechnical 8 Task 3.6 Traffic Analysis 9 Task 3.7 Conceptual Landscape Plan 10 Task 3.8 Stage Construction Concepts and TMP 10 Task 3.9 Alternative Refinement 10 Task 3.10 Cost Estimate 10 Task 3.11 Value Engineering 10 Task 3.12 Draft Project Report 10 Task 3.13 Aerial Mapping 10 Task 3.14 Final Engineering 10 Task 3.15 Advanced Planning Studies 11 Task 3.16 Right -of -Way Requirements 12 Task 3.17 Right -of -Way Data Sheets 12 Task 3.18 Right of Way Definition Drawings 13 Task 3.19 Final Project Report 13 Subtask 3.19.1 Fact Sheets (Advisory and Mandatory) 13 Task 4.0 Project Alternatives Description 15 193 Task 4.1 Development of Project Alternatives Description for Environmental Technical Reports 15 Task 4.2 Modification of Project Alternatives Description for Environmental Document 15 Task 5.0 Environmental Technical Reports 16 Task 5.1 Community Impact Assessment 16 Task 5.2 Relocation Impact Document/Statement 16 Task 5.3 Visual Impact Assessment 18 Task 5.4 Cultural Resources 18 Task 5.5 Paleontological Inventory/ Evaluation Report 18 Task 5.6 Floodplain Evaluation Report 18 Task 5.7 Water Quality Assessment Report 18 Task 5.8 Initial Site Assessment 18 Task 5.9 Air Quality Technical Report 18 Task 5.10 Technical Noise Analysis 20 Task 5.11 Natural Environment Study 20 Task 5.12 Biological Survey Reports 20 Task 5.13 MSHCP Equivalency Analysis 20 Subtask 5.13.1 DBESP for Los Angeles Pocket Mouse, Narrow Endemic Plant Species, and Riparian/Riverine Areas 21 Task 5.14 Corridor Video Survey 23 Task 5.15 Completion of Section 106 and Cultural Resources in the Final EIR/ EIS 23 Task 6.0 Environmental Document 28 Task 6.1 Technical Section Updates 28 Task 6.2 Administrative Draft EIR/EIS 28 Task 6.3 Draft EIR/EIS Preparation 28 Task 6.4 Draft EIR/ EIS Circulation 28 Task 6.5 Public Involvement 28 Subtask 6.5.1 Revised Scoping 28 Subtask 6.5.2 Public Information Meeting 28 Subtask 6.5.3 Draft EIS/ EIR Public Noticing 28 Subtask 6.5.4 Public Hearings 28 Subtask 6.5.5 Final EIS/ EIR Public Noticing 28 Task 6.6 Final EIR/EIS 29 Subtask 6.6.1 Response to Comments 29 Subtask 6.6.2 Floodplain Encroachment Only Practicable Finding 29 Subtask 6.6.3 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation 30 Subtask 6.6.4 Final EIR/EIS Preparation 30 Subtask 6.6.5 Final EIR/EIS Circulation 34 Task 6.7 Project Approval 35 Task 6.8 Project Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Plan 35 Task 6.9 Route Adoption 37 Task 6.10 Notice of Determination and Record of Decision 38 Task 6.11 FHWA Major Project Requirements 39 Subtask 6.11.1 Project Management Plan (PMP) 39 Subtask 6.11.2 Cost Estimate Review 40 • 194 Task 7.0 Optional Tasks 45 Task 7.1 Additional Document Revisions/Review Cycles 45 Task 7.2 Additional Project Management and Administration 45 Task 7.3 Additional unforeseen requests by Stakeholders 45 195 Task 1.0 Project Management This Scope and Cost Proposal includes all activities remaining for the preparation of the Final Project Report (PR) and Final Environmental Document required for Project approval. This proposal recognizes the publication and circulation for comment of Draft Project Report (DPR) and the Draft Environmental Document (DED) occurred in February -March 2013. Prior to these milestones, several other engineering studies and environmental technical reports were completed (available at http:/ /www.sr79project.info/library-links). This revised scope of work replaces the existing scope between Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and CH2M HILL. This proposal includes task activities over the next 27 months and covers the period from July 2013 to October 2015 (see attached schedule). The cost proposal for the following tasks is based on the process requirements to prepare the final Project Report and Environmental Document. Should unforeseen issues arise that are not included in this scope of work, it may be necessary to again revise the proposed Project cost, scope, and schedule. CH2M HILL will provide regular progress reports with the status of each task and will notify RCTC if the level of effort for a given task has the potential to exceed the estimated level of effort and/or cost. This information will be provided to RCTC as part of Task 1.6, Progress Reporting and Invoicing. This scope and cost proposal is based on the Project Description in the DED. As described in the Project Description, the design used in this scope includes consideration of four corridor alternatives, two utility relocation areas, and several hydrology easements. Two of the corridor alternatives (1b and 2b) have design options (lbl and 2b1) that lower the highway profile but do not alter the horizontal alignment. Each of the Build alternatives is composed of different combinations of the Project segments (A through N) identified for the Project. Any changes to the Project as defined in the November 21, 2007, version of the Project Description, unless explicitly discussed below, are not covered by this scope of work and accompanying cost proposal. In addition, responses to subpoenas, or litigation activities are not included in this scope of work. Task 1.1 Project Management As the prime consultant, CH2M HILL will modify subcontracts with subconsultants and direct and coordinate their work. Prime contract terms and conditions will be incorporated into the subcontract agreements, as required. CH2M HILL will be the primary contact for RCTC. Under this task, CH2M HILL will also address contractual issues with RCTC as necessary. CH2M HILL will continue to maintain the Project files. This task also includes general management activities associated with completion of the PR, Environmental Technical Reports, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)/ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Document (ED), and other work activities conducted as part of this scope of services. It is assumed that the schedule from NTP to ROD will be up to 27 months. 196 Task 1.2 Project Development Team Meetings Monthly Project Development Team (PDT) meetings will be held at RCTC in Riverside. The purpose of these meetings will be to discuss and resolve Project issues and coordinate activities required for the preparation of the Final PR and Final ED. Agendas will be prepared and distributed at least 5 working days prior to the meetings. Meeting minutes will be prepared and distributed within 5 working days after each meeting. It is assumed that there will be up to 27 PDT meetings during the remainder of this contract. The PDT meetings will be preceded by a Trend meeting one week prior to each PDT meeting. At the Trend meetings, CH2M HILL will present budget status and update RCTC on contractual issues and also any other issues that may affect scope, schedule, and budget for this contract. It is assumed that there will be up to 27 Trend meetings during the remainder of this contract. Task 1.3 Resource Agency Meetings Meetings will be held with various resource agencies involved in the Project. These will include RCTC, and may include the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). For the purposes of this scope of services and cost proposal, it is assumed that up to 18 resource agency meetings will beheld through the remaining duration of this contract to facilitate coordination of the Final ED, the compliance with the NEPA/404 MOU, and preparation of MSHCP documentation. Task 1.4 Other Meetings Individual meetings will beheld with various agencies and the public involved in the Project. The meetings covered under this task are large meetings where formal presentations are required. These may include presentations to City Councils, Homeowner Associations, Planning Commissions, RCTC Board, County Supervisors, or other entities. In addition, CH will also prepare exhibits, presentations, and maps for RCTC staff use as requested at such meetings. Question and Answer (Q&A) sheets and other Project announcements will be prepared and distributed to provide general updates to the public, or in association with certain designated meetings that will be attended by the public. An existing Stakeholder Mailing List will be maintained and updated to support distribution of Project Q&A sheets and announcements. Distribution methods include direct mailings and/or electronic mail (e- mail). Assumptions • It is assumed that up to 20 of these meetings will be required, either in terms of attendance or presentation material preparation. • 2 197 • The Stakeholder Mailing List will be updated as necessary based on updated contact information received through the Project website and public meeting attendance. • Project newsletter distribution, direct mail announcements, and e-mail announcements are individually assumed to occur a maximum of two times per year. Task 1.5 Stakeholder Meetings Coordination with various stakeholders is anticipated to occur outside the scheduled PDT, resource agency, and other meetings. This coordination is anticipated to occur in the form of emails, telephone conference calls, or focused meetings. In addition, CH will also prepare exhibits, presentations, and maps for RCTC staff use as requested at such meetings. This coordination is anticipated to include various public and private entities including, but not limited to, the following: • Municipal Water District • Riverside County Flood Control • City of Hemet • City of San Jacinto • County of Riverside • Local developers • Native American Tribes • Riverside Transit Agency • Hemet -Ryan Airport It is assumed that up to 20 of these meetings will be required during the remaining duration of this contract. Task 1.6 Progress Reporting and Invoicing Progress reports will be prepared and submitted monthly with a brief narrative describing the work accomplished during the reporting period and a discussion of outstanding issues and action items. The reports will also include any concerns or substantive issues with recommendations for appropriate actions. The progress reports will correspond to the accounting cycles used for the preparation of invoices to facilitate Project oversight. Invoices will be prepared and include costs to date and percent complete. This scope anticipates up to 27 progress reports. CH2M HILL will develop and maintain a detailed schedule for the Project using Primavera and update it as needed, but at least monthly. Earned value reports and cash flow charts will be prepared for presentation at the Trend meetings. Task 1.7 Quality AssurancelQuality Control CH2M HILL's quality assurance/quality control program will be implemented and maintained throughout the Project to ensure compliance with RCTC, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines in addition to ensuring technical and product quality: The Project Manager and senior staff will check and review deliverables prior to submittal 3 198 Task 1.8 Landowner Access Private property access is required to conduct field surveys as part of the environmental analysis for the Project. CH2M HILL will assist ROTC, and those entities that also assist RCTC, with the identification of landowners for parcels requiring field surveys. This task will include the maintenance of a GIS-based database to track the status of landowner access approval and property access issues including the preparation of written letters requesting private property. access: This task will also include notifying landowners of field activities via FEDEX letters notifying owners of upcoming surveys, coordinating appointments for those owners that want to attend our work, and for coordinating animal, keys for locked gates, and fences. As the majority of field surveys have been completed for the Project, a reevaluation of current land ownership by evaluating the County database is not anticipated. The following effort is included in this task: • 2013-14 survey: Up to ten field visits by biological staff for MSHCP Equivalency Analysis, Cultural Resources mitigation, and Conceptual Mitigation Plan preparation tasks Task 1.9 GIS Data Management A Project Geographic Information System (GIS) database has been developed by CH2M HILL to include information regarding Project description engineering information, land use, biological resources, and other data specific to the Project. CH2M HILL will develop and host an internal, secure web -based data management system to allow. CH2M HILL staff and subconsultants use of Project GIS/Microstation data to facilitate the analysis for the preparation of both the environmental documents and Project Report. A new aerial base layer was received in April, 2013 from Riverside County. All relevant GIS and Microstation graphics in the Draft EIR/EIS and Draft Project Report will, as part of the. preparation of the Final EIR/ EIS and Final PR, be modified to include this new aerial base. Assumptions • GIS management activities include, data tracking, landowner access database, County GIS coverage database, all field survey data, data QA/QC and processing and organizing engineering data used for technical studies. • No new aerials will be flown for the Project. • This task is planned to support all Project tasks, and all products will provide data and mapping to all Project team members. • This task supports all disciplines of the Project team. No individual deliverables (reports) from this task are included. • No software or equipment will be purchased for this task. 199 • Task 1.ES Environmental Streamlining Application This task is complete. Task 1.10 Project Website CH2M HILL will support the maintenance of the external Project website (www.sr79project.info) by providing Project -related information in the appropriate electronic format for easy upload conducted by Geographics, a firm under subcontract to CH2M HILL. Materials anticipated to be appropriate for posting on the Project website include Project text, Q&A Sheets, meeting notices, Project updates, and Project -related documents. All website materials will receive RCTC approval prior to being posted on the website. Assumptions • 2013: One website update is included • 2014: Two website updates are included • 2015: One website update is included • Final documents completed for the Project will be added to the website as completed. • Website development is not included in this task. • CH2M HILL will not host the website or develop electronic website pages. 200 • • Task 2.0 NEPA/404 MOU Concurrence Tasks These tasks will support obtaining required approvals per the NEPA/404 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Task 2.1 Purpose and Need This task is complete. Task 2.2 Project Criteria and Alternatives Selection This task is complete. Task 2.3 Updated Project Criteria and Alternatives Selection This task is complete. Task 2.4 Final Agreement: Purpose and Need, Criteria, and Alternatives While this initial task is complete, potential project adjustments in response to public comments may need to be discussed with NEPA/404 team members. Agreement on such changes will occur in conjunction with the identification of the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) (Task 2.5). Task 2.5 LEDPA This task will support the identification of the Section 404 Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). The process outlined in the 2006 Guidance for the implementation of the NEPA/404 MOU for Checkpoint 3 will be followed. CH2M HILL will assist Caltrans in the drafting of the correspondence necessary for initiation of Checkpoint 3, and will prepare the supporting information packet for Caltrans review and approval. This task will occur during the development of the Final EIR/EIS for the Project. Assumptions • A Final 404 Alternatives Analysis will be prepared in order to identify the LEDPA. • The Conceptual Mitigation Plan required in support of Checkpoint 3 activities is described under task 6.8.1.4 below. • The LEDPA is not necessarily the biologically preferred alternative. • It is assumed the LEDPA will also be the Preferred Alternative. The Draft Final EIR/EIS will document the LEDPA. • Coordination with the required agencies for Final Agreement approval will be included under the Resource Agency Meeting Task. 201 s • The Preferred Alternative with the removal of Tres Cerritos interchange will need to be analyzed as part of the Final ED. Task 2.6 Preliminary Agreement of Compliance with Section 404(b)(1) It is intended that the Final Agreement for the Project will include a response from the USACE that Compliance with Section 404(b)(1) for the Project will be obtained based on previous alternative screening activities. Assumptions • No independent document will be required for this approval. • The Project Description included in the DED is sufficient to document compliance with Section 404(b)(1). • Coordination with the required agencies will be included under the Resource Agency Meeting Task. • National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are not included in the Project NEPA/404 MOU process. Coordination or approval from these agencies is not expected to be required and, as such, is not included. 7 202 Task 3.0 Engineering These tasks include the preliminary engineering activities required for the preparation of the Project Report and the Environmental Document. Task 3.1 Location Hydraulic Study This task is complete. Task 3.2 Storm Water Data Report The Storm Water Data Report will be updated for the Preferred Alternative in accordance with the May 2012 version of the Caltrans Project Planning and Design Guide. The Storm Water Data Report will be updated to include the Risk Level Determination and other attachments required for the PA/ED phase of the Project per the May 2012 Storm Water Data Report template. The Storm Water Data Report will include a Project description, define site data and storm water quality design issues, discuss any RWQCB agreements, describe proposed temporary pollution prevention Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be used during the Project construction, describe proposed permanent treatment BMPs to be used on the Project, and provide estimated construction cost. Attachments as outlined in Appendix E of the Project Planning and Design Guide will be prepared. The Storm Water Data Report will be prepared based upon the Project Description as stated in the February 2013 Draft EIR/EIS. Deliverables • Storm Water Data Report (up to 10 printed copies with electronic copy per review cycle and up to 10 final copies with electronic copy). Assumptions • Two Caltrans review cycles are assumed. Task 3.3 Drainage Studies This task is complete Task 3.4 Utility Coordination This task is complete. Task 3.5 Geotechnical This task is complete. 203 s Task 3.6 Traffic Analysis There is a need to update the traffic analysis to conduct the opening year evaluation, extend the horizon year, and to address the Sunnyvale court decision. To address these needs while managing the risk of delays caused by a comprehensive modeling update, the recommendation is to develop a supplement to the existing traffic report to include an opening year analysis and a revised horizon year analysis. The specific steps are as follows: • Update the horizon year traffic forecasts to 2040 using growth factors. • Develop backcast factors to use the previously -developed horizon year (2035) forecasts to create an opening year 2020 forecast. • Develop updates to the traffic operations analysis tools (e.g., TRAFFIX, VISTRO, or Synchro) to determine opening year LOS and update the horizon year LOS. • Prepare a 2004 NOP baseline analysis using future year changes in traffic volumes at the intersection level to address Sunnyvale. • Prepare a supplemental traffic study report, and then update all affected figures, tables and text in the Draft EIR/EIS for the Final EIR/EIS. Deliverables • A supplemental traffic study report (6 printed copies with electronic copy per review cycle and 6 final copies with electronic copy). • Update to all affected traffic figures, tables and text in the Draft EIR/EIS for inclusion in the Final EIR/EIS Assumptions • The new opening year (2020) and horizon year (2040) were confirmed in a meeting with RCTC and Caltrans on May 7, and they will not be revised • The proposed approach to update the traffic analysis to be consistent with the Sunnyvale ruling will be based on a "delta" analysis of project/no project, and no additional 2004 models will be developed • ` No additional work will be required of CH2M HILL as a result of a need to update the Regional Transportation Plan or the Mid -County Parkway project • Two Caltrans review cycles are assumed • The traffic forecast model developed for the DEIR will be re -used, and needed year traffic volumes will be backcasted or forecasted to the required opening year and horizon year. A new traffic forecast model will not be required. • 204 • Task 3.7 Conceptual Landscape Plan This task is complete. Task 3.8 Stage Construction Concepts and TMP This task is complete. Task 3.9 Alternative Refinement This task is complete. Task 3.10 Cost Estimate The construction cost estimate for the Preferred Alternative will be updated to current construction dollars (2013), which will then be escalated to reflect a beginning construction year of 2020. This estimate will be included as part of the Final PR. Structures costs will also be updated based on the new seismic design criteria, dated December 2012, see Task 3.15 for details. Additionally, a Cost Estimate Review will be conducted, as included in Subtask 6.11.2. Assumptions • Construction Cost Estimate will be provided for the preferred Alternative only. Task 3.11 Value Engineering This task is complete. Task 3.12 Draft Project Report This task is complete. Task 3.13 Aerial Mapping This task is complete. Task 3.14 Final Engineering Following the public review and comment of the Draft ED, the Preferred Alternative will be identified. Additional refinement will be made to the Preferred Alternative only for the Final PR. This task encompasses the general engineering work needed to finalize the design for the Preferred Alternative to support the preparation of the Final EIR/EIS and Final PR. This task will also include responding to comments from Caltrans on the Draft PR and responding to public comments on the Draft ED as they relate to the preferred alternative that will still be presented in the Final PR. Based on public comments it is assumed that the Tres Cerritos interchange will be removed from the project. The preferred Alternative will be updated showing the removal of this interchange as well as any other modifications needed to the upstream and downstream interchanges affected by this change. 205 10 To the extent possible, the modifications made to the geometrics made in the Right of Way Definition Drawings (RWDD) will be incorporated into the Preferred Alternative geometries. Deliverables • 11x17 cut sheets of the preferred Alternative to be included in the Final Project Report (FPR). • Updated exhibits in the Final EIR/ EIS showing the removal of the Tres Cerritos interchange as part of the preferred Alternative. Assumptions • The Preferred Alternative will be selected from one of the existing Alternatives already developed for the project and included in the Draft PR. It is assumed that the Tres Cerritos interchange will not be included in the Preferred Alternative. Any changes made to the geometries of the preferred alternative will not go outside the existing APE for the project. • The Preferred Alternative geometries and plans will be in metric units, as was done during the DPR and DEIR/ DEIS phase. • Traffic analysis and roadway geometric changes to accommodate the removal of the Tres Cerritos interchange will be done for the preferred Alternative only. Task 3.15 Advanced Planning Studies Purpose The purpose of the APS plans is to develop a preliminary structure design for the purpose of establishing reliable cost estimate for the Preferred Alternative as part of the Final PR for the Project. Methodology There are a number of guidelines and procedures by Caltrans on the preparation of APSs. In general, the preparation of the APS shall follow the Ca'trans Memo to Designers 1-8. Additional guidelines are provided by Caltrans - Office of Special Funded Project (OSFP) Information and Procedures Guide; dated December 2012. In order to establish a high reliability for the proposed design and the cost estimate, the design team for the APS plans must review a number of design parameters that may impact such design. A list of the design parameters may include the following: • Preliminary roadway design -alignment and profiles • Preliminary information on critical controls vertical clearance and lateral clearance • Preliminary staging plans and detour plans (on and off the structure) • Utility survey and location maps • Route concept and future widening plan • Special railroad requirements • Special foundation requirements, including scour critical work • Special aesthetic treatment 206 • • • Environmental mitigation that may affect the structure type selection We will prepare three new APSs, which were not included in the DPR, as part of the Final PR. The three bridges are: • Ramona Expressway Undercrossing on Segment N • SR-79 / MCP Grade Separation Bridge on Segment N • SR-79 / Ramona Blvd Overcrossing on Segment N These APS reports will be added with the previously completed twenty-five APS reports and be a part of the Final PR. Deliverables • APSs for the three new bridges (6 printed copies with electronic copy per review cycle and 6 final copies with electronic copy). • Updated construction cost estimate. Assumptions • The existing 25 APSs prepared for the Draft PR and approved by Caltrans will not be changed. • The three new APSs will be prepared for the Preferred Alternative only. • Two Caltrans review cycles are assumed. Task 3.16 Right -of -Way Requirements This task is complete. Task 3.17 Right -of -Way Data Sheets Purpose To estimate the right-of-way acquisition costs for the Preferred Alternative for inclusion in the Final PR: Right of Way Data Sheets list the estimated cost of acquiring the right of way and permanent easements of each impacted parcel. It includes such costs as the value of the property taken, excess land damages, loss of goodwill, major rehabilitation, utility relocation, relocation assistance payments, clearance/ demolition, title and escrow, and condemnation costs. The Final Relocation Impact Document (FRID/ FRIS)/ Final Relocation Impact Study/Statement (FRIS) is required for all projects that displace persons, businesses, or farm or non-profit organizations. Its purpose is to assess the possible relocation impact an alternative might have on those displaces. The assessment will follow the requirements in Caltrans' Environmental Handbook, Volume 4 and provide documentation specified for by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Deliverables • ROW Data Sheets will be updated for the Preferred Alternative by Epic Land Solutions. 207 12 Task 3.18 Right of Way Definition Drawings This task is complete. Task 3.19 Final Project Report Purpose To incorporate comments from the Draft PR and prepare a Final PR that will recommend formal Project approval. Methodology CH2M HILL will review and incorporate comments from Caltrans Headquarters and prepare Final Advisory and Mandatory Fact Sheets on the Preferred Alternative Deliverables • Final PR (up to 10 printed copies per review cycle; up to 10 final copies ) • Electronic Copies of the Final PR Assumptions • Only minor adjustments to elements of the Preferred Alternative will be required that do not go outside the existing APE for the project and do not require any environmental re- validation • 2 Caltrans review cycles are assumed Subtask 3.19.1 Fact Sheets (Advisory and Mandatory) Purpose To incorporate comments from the Draft Advisory and Mandatory Fact Sheets, and receive final concurrence from Caltrans on all design exceptions. Methodology CH2M HILL will review and incorporate comments from Caltrans Headquarters and prepare Final Advisory and Mandatory Fact Sheets on the Preferred Alternative by the cities of Hemet and San Jacinto. Additional Ianguage and exhibits will be prepared to conclude that the interchange shown is the most logical type of interchange to use at these locations. Deliverables • Final Advisory and Mandatory Fact Sheets • Electronic Copy of Final Fact Sheets Assumptions • Caltrans will approve the Mandatory and Advisory design exceptions after one additional review by Headquarters that has been submitted. • Two review meetings with CaItrans will be needed to gain Caltrans approval. 13 208 • • The design changes at the Esplanade and Sanderson Avenue interchanges will not result in a project footprint that extends beyond the current APE or ROW limits. • The design changes at the Esplanade and Sanderson Avenue interchanges will not result in the formulation of, or the analysis of, a new project alternative. 209 14 Task 4.0 Project Alternatives Description Task 4.1 Development of Project Alternatives Description for Environmental Technical Reports This task is complete. Task 4.2 Modification of Project Alternatives Description for Environmental Document This task is complete. 210 Task 5.0 Environmental Technical Reports The following Environmental Technical Reports were prepared in association with the Project; most (with the exception of sensitive cultural resource reports) are available on the project web site: • Community Impact Assessment (Section 4[f]) • Draft Relocation Impact Report • Visual Impact Assessment • Area of Potential Effect Map (APE) • Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR) • Archaeological Survey Report (appendix to HPSR) • Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER) (appendix to HPSR) • Extended Phase 1 Testing Report (appendix to HPSR) • Joint Paleontological Identification Report/ Paleontological Evaluation Report (PIR/PER) • Paleontological Mitigation Plan (PMP) • Floodplain Evaluation Report • Water Quality Assessment Report • Initial Site Assessment • Air Quality Technical Report • Technical Noise Analysis • Natural Environment Study • Wetland Delineation Report • Biological Survey Reports (species surveys including burrowing owl, rare plants, riparian birds, vernal pool fairy shrimp, mammals, and general wildlife) The following reports need to be prepared or substantially revised: • Air Quality Localized Analysis for Criteria Pollutant Emissions described in Task 5.9 • Cultural Resources Analysis described in Task 5.15 • Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) described in Task 5.13.1 • Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Equivalency Analysis described in Task 5.13 • Relocation Impact analysis described Task 5.2 Noise Analysis as described in Task 5.10 Task 5.1 Community Impact Assessment This task is complete. Task 5.2 Relocation Impact DocumentlStatement The Draft Relocation Impact Document/Statement is complete. The Final Relocation Impact Document/Statement will be prepared following identification of the Preferred Alternative. 16 211 Epic Land Solutions, under subcontract to CH2M HILL, will perform this task. The Final Relocation Impact Document/Statement ("final statement) will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans guidelines and the "Uniform Act." The final report will include a description of the study area, focusing on any areas where right-of-way will need to be acquired for the project. It will discuss any affected neighborhoods, public facilities, non-profit organizations, and families having special composition (e.g., ethnic, minority, elderly, disabled, or other factors) which may require special relocation considerations. The reports will include the number and type of: • Residential Displacements • Multi -Family Displacements • Business/ Nonprofit Displacements • Farms/Agriculture Displacements The report will discuss: • The potential for last resort housing and the current and anticipated availability of relocation resources • Any relocation problems specific to this Project and the alternatives, along with suggested solutions/mitigation solutions to those problems • Potential sequencing or foreseeable relocation difficulties of unusual or difficult displacees The report will list all of the proposed acquisitions in a table, differentiate residential and business acquisitions, and define each as either full or partial acquisition. The report will include an estimate of: • The number of households to be displaced, including the family characteristics (e.g., minority, ethnic, disabled, elderly, large family, income level, and owner/tenant status). As very few residents will be displaced, information on race, ethnicity, and income levels will not be included in the EIR/EIS to protect the privacy of those affected. • The numbers, descriptions, types of occupancy (owner/tenant), and sizes (number of employees) of businesses and farms to be displaced. The discussion should identify (1) sites available in the area to which the affected businesses may relocate, (2) likelihood of such relocation, and (3) potential impacts on individual businesses and farms caused by displacement or proximity of the proposed highway if not displaced. Because of the large local housing market that provides a variety of safe and sanitary replacement housing options and the limited number of relocations that are anticipated, mitigation measures are not expected to be extraordinary but will include a discussion comparing available (decent, safe, and sanitary) housing in the area with the housing needs of the displacees. The comparison will include (1) price ranges, (2) sizes (number of bedrooms), and (3) occupancy status (owner/tenant). 17 212 • These reports will use existing available information in the market including professional services, R.E. Brokers, publications, studies, and government resources. Deliverables • Final Relocation Impact Document Assumptions • Two Caltrans review cycles are assumed. • Two hard copies, and an electronic version of each submittal will be supplied, Incorporate Final Relocation Impact Document/Statement The Final EIR/EIS will summarize the information developed under this task. The information provided in the Final EIR/EIS will address impacts along the Preferred Alternative only. Existing information for all alternatives that is included in the Draft EIR/ EIS will be retained but not updated. Task 5.3 Visual Impact Assessment This task is complete. Task 5.4 Cultural Resources The initial Cultural Resources task is complete. Task 5.15 describes additional effort needed to reach the Record of Decision (ROD). Task 5.5 Paleontological Inventory/Evaluation Report This task is complete. Task 5.6 Floodplain Evaluation Report This task is complete. Task 5.7 Water Quality Assessment Report This task is complete. Task 5.8 Initial Site Assessment This task is complete. Task 5.9 Air Quality Technical Report The Final Air Quality Technical Report and a Technical Report Addendum Memorandum are complete. Subsequent to the supplemental traffic analysis described under task 3.6 above, there will be a need to update the air quality study for the SR-79 project via preparation of a technical 213 18 memorandum. The air quality analyses to be updated will include the CO and PM hot spot analyses, MSAT analysis, and the Greenhouse Gas analysis. Deliverables • Air Quality Technical Memorandum Assumptions • The updated analyses will only be performed for those instances where the results analyzed in the Draft EIR/EIS would change with the updated traffic conditions. • The technical memorandum will summarize the updated air quality analytical results. The Air Quality Technical Report will not be updated. • It is assumed that the air quality impact conclusion will not change compared to the Draft EIR/EIS for each of the analyses. Additional mitigation measures will not be required. • Air quality impact analysis approaches will remain the same as previously used in the technical report and Draft EIR/ EIS. • It is assumed that a quantitative PM hot spot analysis is not required for the project. This scope of work includes the preparation of a stand-alone quantitative PM hot spot analysis report for interagency consultation. • Vehicle emissions will be estimated using EMFAC2011. A new version of CT-EMFAC that can incorporate EMFAC2011 output will be used if available for the MSAT emission estimates. Other updates related to recent regulatory and guidance changes are not included. • Two copies of the Air Quality Technical Memorandum will be submitted to RCTC and to District 8 in each of two review cycles. • Two Copies of the PM Hot Spot Analysis will be submitted to RCTC and to District 8 in each of two review cycles. • The finalized PM Hot Spot Analysis will be transmitted by Caltrans to the Transportation Conformity Working Group for approval. • Once the Air Quality Technical Report Addendum is completed and approved by RCTC and District 8, the Air Quality sections in the EIR/ EIS will be updated with the new results from the Air Quality Technical Report Addendum. It is assumed that the EIR/EIS will only be updated for the sections where air quality analysis results would change with the traffic conditions. Air Quality Conformity Report A stand alone Air Quality Conformity Report will be prepared and submitted to RCTC and District 8 for review. Subsequent to Caltrans approval the document will be submitted to FHWA for review and approval. The Air Quality Conformity Report will use available analyses in the EIR/EIS, no additional analysis would be required. • 214 • Task 5.10 Technical Eloise Analysis This task is complete. The Noise Study Report, dated July 2010, the Noise Abatement Decision Report, dated July 2010, and the Technical Report Addendum Memorandum, Noise Study Report, dated August 2010 are complete. Assumptions • No changes to the existing Noise technical reports and Final ED will be necessary. • The existing NADR was approved on July 28, 2010. In 2011, FHWA and Caltrans revised their noise analysis study policy. The grandfathering date was July 13, 2011. The new policy does not apply to this project. Task 5.11 Natural Environment Study This task is complete. Task 5.12 Biological Survey Reports This task is complete. Task 5.13 MSHCP Equivalency Analysis The Project is required to evaluate the impacts to the criteria area of the MSHCP. This analysis is only required for the Preferred Alternative and will be described within a document referred to as an Equivalency Analysis. The MSHCP Equivalency Analysis will address the following: • Effects on habitats • Effects on Planning Species proposed for Non-contiguous Habitat Blocks 6 and 7 and Existing Constrained Linkage B • Effects on Core Areas (as identified on the MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages Map, Figure 3-2) • Effects on Linkages and Constrained Linkages (as identified on the MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages Map) • Effects on MSHCP Conservation Area configuration and management (such as increases and decreases in edge) Deliverables This document will be submitted/reviewed after identification of the Preferred Alternative for the Project. The deliverables for the MSCHP Equivalency Analysis will include a separate bound report with two submittals, as listed below. The deliverables are the following: 215 zo • Draft MSCHP Equivalency Analysis for submittal to RCTC, Caltrans, RCA, USFWS, and CDFG (Submittal 1) • Response to comments in table format • Coordination on comments (meeting/ email/ conference call) • Final MSCHP Equivalency Analysis with track changes from submittal 2 incorporated (Submittal 2) The format and number of copies for each submittal are provided below: Submittal 1: Two hard copies and two CDs of the Draft MSCHP Equivalency Analysis for submittal to RCTC, RCA, USFWS, and CDFG • Five hard copies and five CDs of the Draft MSCHP Equivalency Analysis for submittal to Caltrans Submittal 2: • One hard copy and one CD of the Final MSCHP Equivalency Analysis for submittal to RCTC, RCA, USFWS, and CDFG Assumptions • The NES will be submitted with the Equivalency Analysis to document impacts for the Project. The Biological Survey Reports completed for the Project will also be provided with the Equivalency Analysis. • An analysis of the acres for each Criteria Cell is not required for the Project. • A HANS application is not required for the Project. • A number of MSHCP Section 7.0 requirements have been addressed and resolved through previous coordination as part of the NEPA/404 MOU integration team. This includes siting and design discussions/justifications and avoidance/minimization requirements for survey species and riparian and rverine habitats. • Detailed mitigation plans for any species or habitat are not included in this analysis. • The Project will not require a minor or major. amendment to the MSHCP. Subtask 5.13.1 DBESP for Los Angeles Pocket Mouse, Narrow Endemic Plant Species, and Riparian/Riverine Areas Sections 6.1.2, 6.1.3, and 6.3.2 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) include discussions regarding the process for projects requiring a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP). A DBESP is only required for the Preferred Alternative and will be described within a document referred to as the "Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation for the Los Angeles Pocket Mouse, Narrow Endemic Plant Species, and Riparian/Riverine Areas." • 216 21 A DBESP will be required for impacts to riparian/ riverine areas since an avoidance alternative is not feasible. The DBESP will ensure replacement of any lost functions and values of habitat as it relates to covered species described in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP: In this section, the MSHCP describes components of the DBESP to include the following information: • Definition of the project area • A written project description, demonstrating why an avoidance alternative is not possible • A written description of biological information available for the project site including the results of resource mapping • Quantification of unavoidable. impacts to riparian/riverine areas and vernal pools associated with the project, including direct and indirect effects It is anticipated that the 90 percent avoidance equivalency threshold for two Narrow Endemic Plant Species will not be met, and therefore, a DBESP will be required. These two plant species are Coulter's goldfields and smooth tarplant. In section 6.1.3, the MSHCP describes components of the DBESP to include the following information: • An expanded project description to include information demonstrating that although the proposed project would exceed the 10 percent Narrow Endemic Plant Species impact threshold, with proposed design and compensation measures, it would result in an overall MSHCP Conservation Area design and configuration biologically equivalent or superior to that which would occur under a project alternative within the impact threshold without these measures. • Demonstration that the biologically equivalent or superior alternative would provide benefits with respect to MSHCP Conservation Area design and configuration should be considered in the context of the following factors: • Effects on habitat with long-term conservation value to Narrow Endemic Plant Species • Effects on the populations of the Narrow Endemic Plant Species • Effects on linkages and function of the MSHCP Conservation Area. It is anticipated that the 90 percent avoidance equivalency threshold for LAPM will not be met, and therefore, a DBESP will be required. Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP pertains to additional survey needs and procedures, which includes the LA Pocket Mouse. In this section, the MSHCP describes components of the DBESP to include the following information: • Effects on conserved habitats supporting the identified species • Effects on the populations of the identified species • Effects on linkages and function of the MSHCP Conservation Area • Effects on MSHCP Conservation Area configuration and management 22 217 Deliverables This document will be submitted/reviewed after identification of the Preferred Alternative for the Project. The deliverables for the MSHCP DBESP will include a separate bound report with two submittals, as listed below. The deliverables are the following: • Draft DBESP for submittal to RCTC, Caltrans, RCA, USFWS, and CDFG (Submittal 1) • Response to comments in table format • Coordination on comments (meeting/email/conference call) • Final DBESP with track changes from submittal 2 incorporated (Submittal 2) The format and number of copies for each submittal are provided below: Submittal 1: • Two hard copies and two CDs of the Draft DBESP for submittal to RCTC, RCA, USFWS, and CDFG • Five hard copies and five CDs of the Draft MSCHP DBESP for submittal to Caltrans Submittal 2: • Two hard copies and two CDs of the Final DBESP for submittal to RCTC, RCA, USFWS, and CDFG • Five hard copies and five CDs of the Final DBESP for submittal to Caltrans DBESP Assumptions • The wildlife agencies receive 60 calendar day review and response period prior to finalizing the DBESP. • Updated surveys are not part of this scope. Task 5.14 Corridor Video Survey A corridor video survey task is not included. Task 5.15 Completion of Section 106 and Cultural Resources in the Final EIRIEIS Applied Earthworks (AE), under subcontract to CH2M HILL, will perform the Cultural Resources Evaluations, Consultation, and Reporting required for completion of the Section 106 process and circulation of the Final EIR/EIS. Final Resource Evaluation and Treatment Resources Evaluation Planning. Consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act must be completed for all historic properties that may be adversely affected prior to preparation of a Final EIR/EIS. This process is in progress, but requires • • 23 218 • • decisions from FHWA, Caltrans, and SHPO, along with further Native American consultation for bedrock milling archaeological sites, and additional archival research and reporting for one historical archaeological site before all evaluations can be completed. One built environment resource (the Colorado River Aqueduct) has been determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); but will not be affected by the Project. This scope assumes that the prehistoric sites will be found eligible under multiple eligibility criteria. Because those sites eligible under multiple eligibility criteria will be directly affected by Project construction, there will be an adverse effect and further treatments will be required to mitigate Project effects. Such treatments may include data -recovery, removing bedrock boulders with milling slicks to a location away from the Project where they can be preserved in perpetuity, or some type of regional cultural landscape study. Further consultation with the SHPO and the tribes will be required to determine the appropriate and acceptable treatments. Once agreement has been reached on the treatments that will be required, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 can be signed, thus officially completing the Section 106 process. The MOA must be signed before the Final EIR/EIS can be circulated, but the actual treatments proscribed in the MOA can be conducted after the ROD has been issued. The sections, below, identify the activities that will ultimately be required for resources evaluation, completion of the Section 106 process, and cultural resources sections of the Final EIR/ EIS. Archaeological Evaluation. Completion of the archaeological site evaluations reported in the draft Archaeological Evaluation Report and Historic Resources Evaluation Report (AER/HRER) requires a decision by Caltrans regarding the approach to be used for evaluating National Register eligibility of the dozens of Bedrock Milling (BRM) sites in the APE. The Draft AER/HRER analyzed the prehistoric sites in the context of a potential archaeological district and in a broader Cultural Landscape, as previously requested by the tribes. The study area incorporated a five -mile radius around the SR 79 Alignment APE and focused on areas that have been investigated intensively (excavation and/or survey), providing a good sample for analysis and comparison. Although previous analysis concluded that the sites and cultural landscape do not meet the threshold required for NRHP eligibility, AE assumes that the tribes, SHPO, and Caltrans have reached an alternative conclusion that the prehistoric sites do qualify for the NRHP under multiple eligibility criteria. The determination that the prehistoric sites are eligible under multiple criteria will require major revision to the landscape study conclusions and numerous consultations with the tribes and the agencies. Further, a conclusion of NRHP eligibility under multiple criteria will also require preparation of a Finding of Adverse Effect; negotiation of a Memorandum of Agreement with the tribes under Section 106; and possibly extensive mitigations to resolve adverse effects (dependent on MOA). These tasks are addressed separately below. Archaeological Evaluation Report/Historic Resources Evaluation Report. AE will revise the existing draft AER/HRER to satisfy Caltrans requirements and to address the revised determination of eligibility for the prehistoric sites. The revised AER/HRER will respond to 219 24 Caltrans comments on the draft; will revise the cultural landscape study conclusions; will delete all discussion of Section 106 phasing; it will report the findings of testing at one of two historical archaeological sites not reported in the draft AER/HRER (whichever is on the Preferred Alternative); and will delete all discussion and analysis of sites that are not on the Preferred Alternative. Curation. AE will prepare collections and facilitate curation of materials collected during the site evaluations. With approval from Caltrans/FHWA, the San Bernardino County Museum, the closest repository that satisfies the National Park Service guidelines (36 CFR 79) and best meets the Project/ agency needs will be used as the repository. AE will consult with the San Bernardino County Museum to obtain accession numbers for the collections, prepare the collections (up to 13 boxes), and transfer the material to the curation facility. Curation fees of $1000 per box will be the responsibility of RCTC. Continuing Agency Coordination. CH2M HILL and AE will provide ongoing coordination with RCTC, Caltrans, and SHPO throughout the Evaluation process. This consultation will focus on ensuring that work completed under this Scope of Work complies with the. requirements of these Agencies for reporting, researcher qualifications, documentation, etc. and will provide consistency between RCTC projects, while adhering to the proposed schedule. The anticipated focus will be on confirming an acceptable approach for evaluating prehistoric bedrock milling sites and for establishing appropriate and acceptable mitigations. Included within this task are up to 12 meetings at the RCTC or Caltrans office. APE Map. An APE map was prepared and approved for the Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR). However, it is anticipated that, following the selection of the Preferred Alternative, a revised APE map will be required by Caltrans, to be included in the Supplemental HPSR. The final APE map will be prepared in consultation with RCTC, Caltrans, and FHWA. Native American and Interested Parties Consultation. CH2M HILL, and its subconsultant AE, will continue to coordinate with Caltrans/FHWA in the Native American consultation process. Intensive consultation is anticipated for the evaluation of bedrock milling sites. FHWA has the ultimate responsibility in Native American consultation. It is understood that the federal government has a unique relationship with federally recognized tribes. Consultation will continue with the tribes and with other interested parties including non - federally recognized Native American groups. During archaeological site evaluation and treatment planning, AE will contact interested parties via letter, follow-up phone calls, coordinating and attending up to four meetings with such groups, documenting comments provided during those meetings, and developing responses to comments, as appropriate. Archival and Historic Research. AE will continue archival and historic research to provide historic context for site evaluation. This research and context will guide the evaluation of whichever historical archaeological resource is on the Preferred Alternative and has not been evaluated. As necessary, research will be conducted in repositories in Riverside County, including the offices of the Riverside County Assessor, Recorder, and Department of Public Works; the University of California, Riverside; California History Room, City of Riverside Public Library; Riverside County Historical Commission; Riverside County Archives Commission; the San Jacinto Valley Museum; and any others as appropriate. • 25 220 Supplemental Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR).. Upon completion of site evaluations and approval of the AER/HRER, IE will complete a Supplemental HPSR. The Supplemental HPSR will be used by Caltrans/FHWA for consultation with the SHPO regarding eligibility of those sites that had not been tested or evaluated prior to the DEIS. It will include National Register eligibility evaluation of resources within the APE, and, as appropriate, a Finding of No Adverse Effect with Standard Conditions, or a Finding of Adverse Effect. The Supplemental HPSR will present a summary of findings, document public participation (including Native American consultation), describe properties identified and their significance/eligibility for the National Register, and the findings for the undertaking as a whole. The Supplemental HPSR will have a location map, Project vicinity map, and APE map as exhibits, as well as photographs, plans, and other graphics. The Supplemental HPSR will contain the following attachments as appropriate: Archaeological Survey Report, Extended Phase I Survey Report, Archaeological Evaluation Report/Historical Resources Evaluation Report, and letters from any concerned or interested parties, along with revised APE maps. Development of a Supplemental Determination of Eligibility and a Finding of Effect for the Studied Resources. AE will work with RCTC/FHWA/Caltrans to develop a Supplemental Determination of Eligibility and Finding of Effect for the newly evaluated resources. This will include a finding of effect for prehistoric resources eligible under multiple criteria, one prehistoric resource that will be protected as an Environmentally Sensitive Area, and the Colorado River Aqueduct, which will not be affected by the Project. Recirculation of Cultural Sections of Draft EIRIEIS and Section 4(f) Analysis AE will work with RCTC/FHWA/Caltrans to develop and recirculate the cultural sections of the Draft EIR/EIS and the Section 4(f) analysis to disclose the conclusion that NRHP- eligible properties will be affected by the Project and to propose treatments to resolve adverse effects/mitigations to reduce significant impacts. Development of a Memorandum of Agreement Assuming that there will be a Finding of Adverse Effect for the Project, compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will require a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) among FHWA, the SHPO, and the Native American tribes to resolve effects. CH2M HILL and AE will work with RCTC/FHWA/Caltrans to develop the MOA, which will set forth strategies, procedures, and schedules for mitigating adverse effects to significant prehistoric resources. This will require numerous consultation meetings with the tribes and Caltrans, along with multiple drafts of an agreement document. Deliverables • Revised APE map • Archaeological Evaluation Report/ Historical Resources Evaluation Report Assumptions • This effort will be completed prior to the Final EIR/ EIS and Record of Decision (ROD). • A single evaluation report (a combined Archaeological Evaluation Report/Historical Resources Evaluation Report), as currentlyexists in draft, will document the results of 2s 221 the evaluations at both prehistoric and historical archaeological components. A supplemental HRER will not be required. Following selection of the Preferred Alternative, no additional changes will be made in the Areas of Potential Effects that would require additional surveys or changes to maps and reports. • If resources eligible for the NRHP are found and require further treatment, such as data recovery, site documentation, or additional regional research, those treatments will occur after the ROD and land acquisition, and are not part of this scope. • If further testing is conducted to discover buried archaeological sites, this will occur after ROW acquisition, and therefore, is not included in this estimate. Likewise, cultural and paleontological resource management activities related to construction (e.g., treatment plans, construction monitoring, Native American consultation, treatment of discoveries, etc.) are not included in this estimate. • Two Caltrans review cycles are assumed. • Two hard copies and an electronic version of each submittal will be supplied. • CH2M HILL and AE will work with RCTC/FHWA/Caltrans to respond to comments on the recirculated cultural sections of the Draft EIR/EIS. Specific comments will be addressed and resultant changes will be incorporated into the Final EIR/ EIS text. 27 222 • Task 6.0 Environmental Document Task 6.1 Technical Section Updates This task is complete. Task 6.2 Administrative Draft EIR/EIS This task is complete. Task 6.3 Draft EIR/EIS Preparation This task is complete. Task 6.4 Draft EIR/EIS Circulation This task is complete. Task 6.5 Public Involvement Subtask 6.5.1 Revised Scoping This task is complete. Subtask 6.5.2 Public Information Meeting This task is complete. Subtask 6.5.3 Draft EIS/EIR Public Noticing This task is complete. Subtask 6.5.4 Public Hearings This task is complete. Subtask 6.5.5 Final EIS/EIR Public Noticing CH2M HILL will prepare and provide the NEPA NOA to Caltrans for publication in the Federal Register. Coordination with the Federal Register remains a responsibility of FHWA under NEPA Assignment. This notice identifies that the Final EIR/EIS is completed and available for public review. The notices will also be sent to all parties that request a copy during public review, published in a newspaper of record in the Project area, and posted on the Project website. Deliverables • Draft NOA for submittal to RCTC, Caltrans, USACE, and FHWA • Revised Draft NOA in track changes for submittal to RCTC, Caltrans, USACE, and FHWA 223 2s • Final NOA for publication will be coordinated by FHWA and Caltrans Assumptions • FHWA and Caltrans will coordinate the posting of the NOA with EPA in the Federal Register • An NOC will not be required for coordination with the State Clearinghouse. The final NOD will be filed with the State Clearinghouse. Task 6.6 Final EIR/EIS Subtask 6.6.1 Response to Comments This task is complete. Subtask 6.6.2 F000dplain Encroachment Only Practicable Finding After identification of the Preferred Project Alternative, an assessment will determine whether it will result in a significant encroachment to the floodplain. As defined in 23 CFR 650.105 a "significant encroachment" is a highway encroachment and any direct support of likely base floodplain development that would involve one or more of the following construction or flood -related impacts: • A significant potential for interruption or termination of a transportation facility that is needed for emergency vehicles or provides a community's only evacuation route • A significant risk to life or property • A significant adverse impact on natural and beneficial floodplain values If the Preferred Alternative will result in a significant encroachment to the floodplain, the Final EIR/EIS will include a finding that it is the only practicable alternative. The finding will be supported by the following: • The reasons the proposed action must be located in the floodplain • The alternatives considered and why they were not practicable • A statement indicating whether the proposed action conforms to applicable state or local floodplain protection standards Deliverables • The finding of only practicable alternative will be included in the Final EIR/EIS. No separate documentation is planned. Assumptions • The floodplain encroachment only practicable alternative finding will be based on information determined in the location hydraulic study and the Floodplain Evaluation Report. 224 Subtask 6.6.3 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation The Section 4(f) Evaluation in the Final EIR/ EIS will evaluate all Section 4(f) impacts along the Preferred Alternative including the qualified public recreation resources included in the Draft EIR/ EIS and any prehistoric or historic properties identified and determined to be eligible to the NHRP under the requisite criteria in the Section 106 process. Deliverables • The Section 4(f) Evaluation will be prepared as a stand-alone document for review and recirculation to the public. It will ultimately be included as an appendix to the Final EIR/ EIS. Assumptions • The newly identified "Cove Park" will be added to the existing analysis of public recreation properties but there will be no use of this or any public recreation property protected by Section 4(f). • Three t istoric properties, and up to 13 prehistoric properties are included in this analysis. These will be developed in the Section 106 process. • Two Caltrans review cycles, each requiring a total of 8 copies of the draft Final Section 4(f) Analysis. • Each review cycle will encompass 22 days. • 40 copies of the Final Section 4(f) Analysis will be printed for public circulation. Subtask 6.6.4 Final EIR/EIS Preparation The Final EIR/ EIS will be reviewed following the process outlined in the Environmental Document Review Process as detailed Chapter 38 - NEPA Assignment in the Standard Environmental Process (SER) dated March 26, 2013. In addition to the existing material included in the Draft EIR/ EIS, this additional information will be included in the document: • Preferred Alternative • Least Environmental Damaging Practicable Alternative • Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations • A list of all persons, agencies and organizations that commented on the Draft EIR/ EIR • A copy of each comment received • MSHCP Consistency Determination Letter from USFWS/CDFG • City of Hemet 2012 General Plan land use information, as related to the SR79 project • San Jacinto General Plan land use update information • Updated County of Riverside plan for the Winchester community 225 • 2010 U.S. Census data, including an update to the Environmental Justice information Deliverables The deliverables for the Final EIR/EIS are identified below: • Admin Draft Final EIR/EIS • Comments Received on the Draft EIR/EIS • Revised Admin Draft Final EIR/EIS • Final EIR/EIS Assumptions • Prior to submittal for review and approval, CH2M HILL will complete an External Quality Control Certification (signed by topic leads and RCTC) and an Environmental Document Review Checklist (signed by the CH2M HILL Environmental Lead), and other quality forms as directed. • District Quality Control Review of the Admin Draft Final EIR/EIS will be accomplished in one 22-business -day review. • Only text and graphics altered from the Draft EIR/EIS during preparation of the Admin Draft Final EIR/EIS will be reviewed by District 8 staff. • DEA and Legal Review of the Admin Draft Final EIR/ EIS will be accomplished in one 22- business -day review. • Only text and graphics altered from the Draft EIR/ EIS during preparation of the Admin Draft Final EIR/EIS will be reviewed by DEA and Legal staff. • HQ DEA Pre -Approval Review will be accomplished in one 10- business -day review. • Only text and graphics altered from the Draft EIR/ EIS during preparation of the Admin Draft Final EIR/ EIS will be reviewed by HQ DEA. • Reviewing Agencies and copies per review cycle: District Quality Control Review: RCTC - 2 hard copies; District 8 - 8 hard copies DEA and Legal Review: RCTC - 2 hard copies; District 8 - 4 hard copies; Caltrans Headquarters - 2 hard copies HQ DEA Pre -Approval Review RCTC 2 hard copies; District 8 - 4 hard copies DEA -1 hard copy; Caltrans Legal -1 hard copy • The cost of each individual EIR/ EIS document is estimated to be $750. • Copies of technical studies will not need to be recirculated to agencies while reviewing/approving the Admin Draft Final EIR/EIS. • The Final EIR/EIS is expected to require a total of 3, 4" binders. After all 3 binders are prepared, only two are expected to have edits. Volume 3 is expected to contain appendix materials. 226 31 • Comments in the Admin Draft Final E1R/E1S are only expected on the new material. • It is assumed that the agency Preferred Alternative would be consistent with the results of the analysis, local agencies requests, and public comments and requests. • Revisions to the Selected Build alternative based on new information or a revised construction scenario are not included. Identify Preferred Alternative and Document Rationale The Final EIR/EIS will identify the agency's Preferred Alternative and explain the rationale for identifying it as the preferred alternative. The identification decision will be structured, analytical, and clearly address the specific evaluation criteria developed for the project. It will ensure that the preferred alternative meets the need and purpose for the project. For identification of the SR 79 Preferred Alternative, which involves a combination of sophisticated and straightforward concerns, a weighted decision matrix is the appropriate technique. We will prepare a template that lists the seven alternatives/design options from the Draft EIR/EIS (no build, four build, and two design options) in the columns and the evaluative criteria in the rows of a matrix. Working with key participants, we will devise criteria weights that will permit a transparent evaluation of the alternatives. From this, the Department and RCTC will be able to identify the Preferred Alternative to be detailed in the Final EIR/ EIS. Deliverables • The Preferred Alternative and the rationale supporting its identification will be documented in a memorandum. • The Preferred Alternative and supporting rationale will be a new section in the Final EIS/ EIS. Assumptions • The Preferred Alternative will not change once selected. • The Preferred Alternative , with the removal of the Tres Cerritos interchange will need to be analyzed Should the Tres Cerritos interchange be deleted, it will be treated as a minor alteration of an existing analyzed alternative. It will not require extensive revisions to the EIR/ EIS. It will not result in a need to recirculate the DED. Update of Information from Local General Plans The City of Hemet adopted a revised general plan in January 2012, too late for analysis in the Draft EIR/ EIS. The Draft EIR/ EIS states the intention to analyze the revised general plan after circulation of the Draft EIR/EIS. That analysis is part of the plan for preparation of the Final EIR/EIS. Incorporation of the Hemet 2012 General Plan will involve revisions to numerous sections of the Draft EIR/EIS. In most cases, these changes are individually relatively minor. All the applicable tables on Existing and Future Land Use will be updated. 32 227 San Jacinto published their General Plan in May 2006 and published an update to all sections in January 2011. They published a revised General Plan map and a revised Land Use Policy map in December 2012. The Final EIR/EIS will incorporate the most recent sections of the San Jacinto General Plan. As with the Hemet 2012 General Plan, incorporation of the more recent San Jacinto 2011 General Plan and the December 2012 General Plan map and a revised Land Use Policy map will involve revisions to numerous sections of the Draft EIR/EIS. Riverside County published their General Plan in October 2003. Riverside County started an update process in July 2008 and published drafts of some revised sections in August 2009. Riverside County has not approved a revised General Plan. The Final EIR/EIS will incorporate the August 2009 Riverside County General Plan revisions if appropriate. In public comments on the Draft EIR/EIS, the Winchester Town Association noted Riverside County provided a land use study for Winchester in September 2012. The Final EIR/EIS will incorporate appropriate material from the study. Deliverables • The revisions to General Plan data in local communities including Hemet, San Jacinto, and Winchester will be included in the preparation of the Final EIR/EIS and not provided or reviewed as a separate document. Incorporation of 2010 Census Data and Update Environmental Justice Analysis Because of the timing of the analysis and availability of data, the Draft EIR/EIS includes the 2000 Census. Several Department comments requested an update to the 2010 data. The Final EIR/ EIS will incorporate appropriate 2010 Census Block Group data on racial and ethnic minorities comparable to the 2000 Census Block Group data found in Section 3.1.4.3 of the Draft EIR/EIS. Deliverables • Information will be included in the Final EIR/ EIS. There will be no separate deliverable or revised technical studies. Deletion of Tres Cerritos Interchange The Tres Cerritos Interchange may be deleted from the project. This will require changes to the Project Description. The Environmental Consequences section under each issue area will need to be edited to reflect the deletion of this interchange from the Preferred Alternative. Changes in graphics and maps will be required throughout the document. Assumptions • Deletion of the interchange will not require additional field work. • Deletion of the interchange will not require alteration of any environmental technical studies. • Deletion of the interchange will not require development or analysis of a new alternative • Deletion of the interchange will be shown on the Preferred Alternative only. • 33 228 • Final EIRIEIS Production After changes to the Draft EIR/EIS and additions to the Final EIR/EIS have been determined and approved, the Final EIR/EIS will be prepared for agency review and public circulation following the guidance in the Caltrans Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement Annotated Outline. Assumptions The following will be required to ready the document for circulation: • Text edits intended for the Final EIR/EIS will be reviewed, proofed, and cross checked against the entire document to maintain quality and consistency. • All figures and appendices will be updated and laid out for both printing and electronic submittal. After all changes have been incorporated and approved internally, the Final EIR/EIS will be laid out for printing, all edits will be proofed, the entire document will be converted to printable PDFs and assembled, and a page -by -page quality check will be made. • Per the Annotated Outline, any changes made to the Draft EIR/EIS will be marked by placing a line in the margin where the changes are made. • Only insertions wilI be shown. • Strikeout text or figures and appendices that have been removed or replaced will not be shown. • After Caltrans approval, and prior to public circulation, an electronic version of the Final EIR/EIS will be created according to EPA eNEPA guidelines. These files will be submitted to EPA by Caltrans, added to the Project website, and included on the CDs created for public circulation. Subtask 6.6.5 Final EIR/EIS Circulation After reviewer comments have been incorporated into the Final EIR/EIS and it is approved by Caltrans to circulate as part of Subtask 6.6.4, the Final EIR/ EIS will be printed and distributed as part of this task. Deliverables • Up to 20 hard copies and up to 100 CDs of the Final EIR/ EIS will be provided. Assumptions • To reduce the number of printed documents, the Final EIR/ EIS will be posted to the Project website. • The cost of each individual EIR/EIS document is estimated to be $750. • Documents will only be shipped to those that require a Final EIR/ EIS. Other copies will be provided to RCTC for their files. 229 34 • The Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse will be provided with copies of the Final EIR/ EIS for distribution to state agencies as required. • All documents will be delivered in a trackable method (FEDEX, UPS, LISPS). • Shipping each document is estimated to be $20. • Caltrans will complete the EIR Certification form for the Project. Task 6.7 Project Approval No activities are included in this task. Task 6.8 Project Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Plan The Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Plan will be included in Final EIR/ EIS as a table. Additional mitigation will be detailed in the Conceptual Mitigation Plan, which will be appended to the Final EIR/ EIS. Conceptual Mitigation Plan A Conceptual Mitigation Plan, originally planned as a task to be performed in the PS&E stage, will be prepared in conjunction with Final EIR/EIS preparation in support of . . Checkpoint 3 of the NEPA/404 Integration Process and in response to agency concerns expressed regarding the Stowe Road Vernal Pool Complex and the engineered drainage system that will contribute post -construction surface flows. The Conceptual Mitigation Plan will consist of four subtasks, as described below. Baseline Hydrology Monitoring Plan A detailed Baseline Hydrology Monitoring Plan (BHMP) will be prepared to facilitate drainage design modifications and provide a basis for later comparison to post -construction conditions in the Stowe Road Vernal Pool Complex. This BHMP will describe the data to be collected, instruments to be installed, timing and duration of the sampling effort, and methods of data interpretation. Data are intended to determine the amount and frequency of surface water flows into the existing drainage in the upper watershed and the amount of sediment transported to the Stowe Road Vernal Pool Complex. The BHMP will be submitted to the RCA, the Wildlife Agencies, the RWQCB, and USACE for review. Baseline Conditions Assessment A Baseline Conditions Assessment (BCA) will be prepared in for the Stowe Road Vernal Pool Complex and the ephemeral drainage that will receive post -construction surface flows from the engineered drainage system. The California Rapid. Assessment Method (CRAM) will be used to characterize the baseline conditions of these features. Postconstruction Surface Water Monitoring Plan A Post -construction Monitoring Plan (PCMP) will be prepared to ensure that the gravity - based surface -water diversion system functions in average, below average, and higher than average water years and provides compensatory hydrology volume, based on the baseline conditions, with an acceptable flow rate into the upper watershed of the Stowe Road Vernal Pool Complex. The PCMP will be implemented after construction. The PCMP will detain the 35 230 procedures to be used to calculate the water flows from the pipe outlet to the existing drainage and total sediment loads within the drainage. Sampling will occur at the instruments installed as part of the BHMP, as well as at new postconstruction locations. The total water flows that occur after construction of the Project, especially storm water discharges, will be evaluated to determine if any modifications are needed to regulate total flows and velocities to the existing drainage, as determined in the BHMP, into the lower watershed. An adaptive management process will be included for evaluating and implementing procedures and/or remedial measures for sediment control, such as deepening the receptor basins or other activities, to prevent scour and release of sediments in excess of the existing condition into the lower watershed. The intent of the monitoring period is to evaluate average, below average, and higher than average water years. The ability to accomplish this will depend on the local precipitation. A five-year monitoring and reporting regime will be detailed in PCMP. Conceptual Mitigation Plan The Project is required to provide a conceptual mitigation plan (CMP) in the Final EIR/EIS to be used in Checkpoint 3 of the NEPA/404 Integration Process. The CMP will provide specific details on compensatory mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. The CMP is only required for the Preferred Alternative and will include the following: • Description of types of mitigation and ratios (mitigation bank, in -lieu fees, creation, restoration) • Description of location of mitigation sites (on -site vs. off -site) • Responsibility for mitigation sites • Site preparation • Planting specifications • Maintenance and monitoring • Contingency • Completion of mitigation Deliverables This document will be submitted/ reviewed after identification of the Preferred Alternative for the Project. The deliverables for the CMP will include a separate bound report with two submittals, as listed below. The deliverables are the following. • Draft CMP for submittal to RCTC, Caltrans, EPA, ACOE, RWQCB and CDFG (Submittal 1) • Response to comments in table format • Coordination on comments (meeting/email/conference call) 36 231 • Final CMP with track changes from submittal 2 incorporated (Submittal 2) The format and number of copies for each submittal are provided below: Submittal 1: • Two hard copies and two CDs of the Draft CMP for submittal to RCTC, Caltrans, EPA, ACOE, RWQCB and CDFG • Five hard copies and five CDs of the Draft CMP for submittal to Caltrans Submittal 2: • Two hard copies and two CDs of the Final CMP for submittal to ROTC, Caltrans, EPA, ACOE, RWQCB and CDFG • Five hard copies and five CDs of the Final CMP for submittal to Caltrans Assumptions • The existing Jurisdictional Delineation Report will be attached to the CMP; no updated JD Report will be prepared. • The BHMP, BCA, and PCMP described above, all focusing on the Stowe Road Vernal Pool Complex, will be submitted and reviewed as attachments to the CMP. Task 6.9 Route Adoption A route adoption will be required for the Project because the realignment of SR 79 will need to be approved as a new alignment of a state facility of an existing route, maintained by Caltrans. The two criteria applied to the Project are defined in the Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual for this action. They include: 1) a new alignment for an existing route, and 2) establishment of a location for an unconstructed route. This activity is anticipated to be primarily managed by RCTC and Caltrans. CH2M HILL will support this activity by preparing the memorandum required for California Transportation Commission (CTC) review and approval. As stated in Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual CH2M HILL's work will include preparing a reproducible map showing the planned location of the route by a singly heavy line and describing the location of the segment for adoption and the segment to be relinquished. Deliverables • Administrative Draft Route Adoption Memo for submittal to RCTC and Caltrans (Submittal 1) • Revised Draft Route Adoption Memo in track changes for submittal to RCTC and Caltrans (Submittal 2) • Final Route Adoption Memo for submittal to ROTC, Caltrans, and CTC (Submittal 3) 37 232 • • Assumptions • The existing portion of SR 79 will be relinquished to the local agencies upon adoption of the new alignment. • RCTC and Caltrans District 8 will manage the communication and scheduling of the Route Adoption hearing. • Revisions to the memo will not be required by the CTC. • This memorandum is expected to be brief and less than 5 pages with only one black and white line drawing figure. • A Modified Access Report or Freeway Agreement is not expected to be required for the Project, as such, it is not included. Task 6.10 Notice of Determination and Record of Decision A Notice of Determination (NOD) and Record of Decision (ROD) represent the final approval of the Project under CEQA and NEPA, respectively. The draft NOD will be prepared by CH2M HILL and submitted to RCTC. After RCTC approval, the NOD will be first approved by Caltrans, then by CTC at the conclusion of the CTC Route Adoption. CH2M HILL will provide a draft ROD for review and approval by RCTC and Caltrans. The ROD represents the agency's final decision regarding the project and is a judicially enforceable document. The ROD will briefly describe each alternative and explain the balancing of values that formed the basis for the selection of the alternative. The ROD will identify the environmentally preferable alternative(s). If the selected alternative is other than the environmentally preferable alternative, the ROD will clearly state the reasons for not selecting the environmentally preferable alternative. The values that were important factors in the decision -making process will be clearly stated along with the reasons some values were considered more important than others. The ROD will summarize any mitigation measures that will be incorporated into the project. The ROD will describe any monitoring or enforcement program adopted for specific mitigation measures. Continuing investigations of cultural resources may result in a Section 4(f) Evaluation. If a Section 4(f) Evaluation is involved, the ROD will include a summary of the Section 4(f). The ROD will be finalized for approval by the Department District Director after comments on the FE1S have been received and responses prepared. NOD Deliverables • Administrative Draft NOD for submittal to RCTC and Caltrans • Revised Administrative Draft NOD in track changes for submittal to RCTC and Caltrans • Final NOD for Caltrans and CTC signature 233 38 ROD Deliverables • An administrative Draft ROD will be provided to Caltrans after RCTC approval. • A revised Administrative Draft ROD will be provided in track changes format for final approval. • One electronic review of the Final ROD to determine if changes were made as requested. Assumptions • Even under NEPA Assignment, FHWA is the agency responsible for posting of the ROD with EPA in the Federal Register • No additional materials will be required to be submitted with these notices. The Joint NOD must be approved prior to FHWA issuing the ROD. • Revisions to any previous documentation for the Project will not be required to complete this task. Task 6.11 FHWA Major Project Requirements Subtask 6.11.1 Project Management Plan (PMP) The surface transportation act, the "Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users" (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub.L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144) establishes the requirements for the Project Management Plan (PMP) and an Annual Financial Plan. Requirements for the PMP did not change with the passage of the most recent surface transportation act, "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century" (MAP-21). In general, the requirements apply to any project with an estimated total cost of $500,000,000 or more. A PMP contains "the procedures and processes that are in effect to provide timely information to the project decision makers to effectively manage the scope, costs, schedules, and quality of, and the Federal requirements applicable to, the project; and the role of the agency leadership and management team in the delivery of the project". The following topics are typically part of the PMP: 1. Project Description and Scope of Work 2. Goals and Objectives 3. Project Organizational Chart, Roles, and Responsibilities 4. Project Phases 5. Procurement and Contract Management 6. Cost Budget and Schedule 7. Project Reporting and Tracking • Project Activities and Deliverables • Action Items/ Outstanding Issues • Project Schedule Project Cost • Project Quality • Other Status Reports 3s 234 • 8. Internal and Stakeholder Communications 9. Project Management Controls (Scope, Cost, Schedule, Claims, etc.) • Risk Management Plan • Scope Management Plan • Scheduling Software • Cost Tracking Software • Project Metrics • New and Innovative Contracting Strategies • Value Engineering, Value Analyses, and Constructability Reviews • Contractor Outreach Meetings • Partnering • Change Order and Extra Work Order Procedures • Claims Management Procedures • Other Programs 10. Design Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) 11. Construction Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) 12. Environmental Monitoring 13. Right -of -Way 14. Safety and Security 15. Traffic Management 16. Project Communications (Media and Public Information) 17. Civil Rights Program 18. Closeout Plan 19. Project Documentation 20. Other Possible Sections (if appropriate) 21. Appendices 22. Executive Leadership Endorsement Deliverables • Draft and Final Project Management Plan Assumptions • One review cycle by Caltrans and RCTC is included Subtask 6.11.2 Cost Estimate Review As part of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) major projects requirements, CH2M HILL and Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) will conduct a 2- day a Cost Estimate Review (CER) workshop with lead designers, Caltrans, FHWA, and RCTC. These workshops will review cost and schedule estimates for the SR 79 Realignment Project. The objective of the CER is to verify the accuracy and reasonableness of the Project's current estimate for total cost and schedule, and to develop a probability ranges for the 235 40 estimate that represents the Project's current stage of development. It is assumed that this 2- day CER workshop will be held in Riverside, California. 6.11.2.1 CER Workshop The CER will be conducted under six subtasks: • CER Task 1. • CER Task 2. • CER Task 3. • CER Task 4. • CER Task 5. • CER Task 6. Pre -workshop plan -set review Pre -workshop construction cost estimate review Pre -workshop schedule review Draft Risk Register review CER Workshop Post -Workshop Activities The intent of CER Task 1 through CER Task 6 is to improve the level of preparedness for the actual workshop. For example, initial cost and schedule reviews and setting up the Monte Carlo modeling in Crystal Ball or Pertmaster will reduce the effort during the workshop and facilitate sensitivity analysis. The findings from CER Task 1 through CER Task 4 are presented in the workshop. All members of the risk team will be expected to spend two to four days in pre -workshop preparation, depending on the discipline. CER Task 5 involves the entire team. CER Task 6 involves the follow-on work required to prepare the risk reports and will generally be limited to three staff members. CER Task 1 Pre -workshop Plan -Set Review This review will compare the draft EIR/EIS State Route 79 detailed project description (project scope) to the most recent plan set, and ultimately against the cost estimate and schedule. This. work will also confirm the status of all third party agreements.. A table of the status of any third party agreements should be available to the risk team prior to the workshop. The results of this review will be presented in the Risk Workshop. CER Task 2 Pre -workshop Construction Cost Estimate Review This task will involve an independent review of the existing draft project report (DPR) cost estimate. The focus of the evaluation will be a comparison of the proposed unit prices to other recent completed projects in CH2M HILL's cost data bank and Caltrans Cost Data Book. After incorporating the SR 79 DPR estimate into the Crystal Ball or Pertmaster model, very preliminary range estimates (min, likely, max) will be prepared down to the third level of the work breakdown structure (WBS). Setting up the risk model prior to the workshop will help expedite the completion of refinements and sensitivity analyses during the workshop. CER Task 3 Pre -Workshop Project Schedule Review Since the Crystal Ball or Pertmaster risk model integrates cost, schedule and the risk register, a schedule review is also required prior to the Risk Workshop. The focus of the review will be limited to the critical path and key supporting functions. The intent will be to "risk -range" up to 20 activities. Best versus worst case durations will be prepared by the • 41 236 independent scheduling team. An initial draft model run will be prepared prior to the CER workshop. The results of the draft model run will be validated in the CER workshop. The model will be re -run incorporating the workshop recommendations. CER Task 4 Draft Risk Register A draft risk register will be prepared and circulated to the team two weeks ahead of the CER workshop. This work will be based on the draft Risk Register prepared by CH2M HILL (dated March 3, 2012) and supplemented with any currently known additional risks. The risk team will be charged with adding to the base risk register. This is done to assure an appropriate level of preparation by the CER team prior to the CER workshop. It is also anticipated that the top 20 risks from the CH2M HILL Risk Register will be incorporated into the Crystal Ball or Pertmaster model for the draft model runs referenced above. CER Task 5 CER Workshop This task includes:1) brainstorm and categorize risks, 2) risk mitigation measures, 3) cost and schedule risk range estimates, 4) draft risk management plan, and 5) exit presentation. This risk review builds upon the work done for Task 6.11.3.1 through Task 6.11.3.4. The workshop agenda will be provided prior to the CER workshop. Brainstorm and Categorize Risks As stated above, CH2M HILL will revise, as appropriate, the Risk Register prepared by CH2M HILL prior to the workshop. The Risk Register will be supplemented during the workshop by the risk team. The risks will be rated as high, medium and low; likely only the first two categories will justify mitigation. This will, at a minimum, serve as a validation of CH2M HILL's work. The risks will be organized in the following categories: • Governance and Management Risk • Requirements Risk • Market Risk • Design Risk • Construction Risk Risk Mitigation Measures The Risk Team will develop draft mitigation measures for the High and Medium risk categories during the latter portion of the workshop. It is anticipated that additional refinements to the mitigation measures will be prepared during the preparation of the final report. At the phase of the project, the team will focus only on primary mitigation, defined as that which occurs throughout the planned actions of RCTC and its design consultants. Cost and Schedule Risk Range Estimates The cost risk analysis will build off of the estimate reviews completed prior to the workshop. The team will review the Crystal Ball worksheets via a screen and projector, so that the range estimates (minimum, most likely, and maximum) are directly input. into the model. The schedule risk range estimates will follow a similar logic to the cost review. Using the existing CH2M HILL cost loaded schedule as a baseline, the schedule review team will 42 237 estimate the minimum, most likely and maximum durations for the critical path elements and key supporting functions. Draft Risk Management Plan A draft RMP will be outlined in the risk workshop for incorporation into the Risk Assessment Report. The RMP will include the draft Risk Register, recommended cost and schedule contingencies, contingency protocols for updating and monitoring the Risk Register, mitigating risk, closing risks and reassessment of project contingencies as the project moves forward. Exit Presentation The Exit Presentation will present the results of the Risk Work and Pre -Workshop activities to RCTC management. Comments received at this presentation will be incorporated into the draft CER report. The agenda for the exit presentation will follow the executive summary of the CER report as shown below. CER Task 6 Post -Workshop Activities Draft Report Both draft and final CER reports will be prepared. The general outline for the draft report is given below with the understanding that this may be modified through continued coordination with RCTC. A final report will be prepared after receiving ROTC comments and after the reconciliation meeting. 1. Executive Summary 1) Approach 2) Results 3) Conclusions and Recommendations 2. Risk Assessment Details 1) Purpose 2) Timing 3) Participants 4) Technical Approach 3. Risk Assessment Basis 1) Cost Estimate Review i. Existing Estimate ii. Recommendations 2) Schedule Review i. Existing Schedule ii. Recommendations 4. Quantitative Results 1) Bottom -up Cost Results 2) Bottom -up Schedule Results 3) Integrated Cost/Schedule Results 4) Results Summary 5. Conclusions and Recommendations 1) Major Risks 2) Mitigation of Major Risks 238 • 3) Impacts of Major Decisions 4) Draft Risk Allocation Matrix for Major Risks Deliverables • Draft and Final CER Report Assumptions • One review cycle by Caltrans and RCTC is included 239 44 • • Task 7.0 Optional Tasks Task 7.1 Additional Document RevisionslReview Cycles The current scope of services incorporates Draft Final EIR/EIS review cycles in an order and duration consistent with the October, 2012, Review Procedures for Environntental Documents under the NEPA Assignment Program available on the Caltrans SER website. It should be noted that the Review Procedures do not specify duration for District Quality Control Review. Duration of 22 business days was assumed. During the Caltrans review of the Draft EIR/ EIS, considerable additional review cycles occurred. In addition, several reviews outside the cycle listed in the Review Procedures occurred (e.g., District review of, and commenting on, responses prepared by Caltrans HQ. This optional task covers the labor and expenses that may be required to revise the ED in the event that, during review of the Draft Final EIR/EIS, additional sets of comments are received and review cycles are. required. Task 7.2 Additional Project Management and Administration In the event that the schedule is extended due to factors mentioned in Task 7.1, additional Project Management and Administration will be necessary. Amendment No. 8 has a total duration of 27 months, from NTP to the ROD. Task 7.2 assumes this schedule will be extended an additional 6 months, due to factors beyond CH2M HILL's control. Task 7.3 Additional unforeseen requests by Stakeholders Since the review process by the project stakeholders is very dynamic in nature and the full extent and possibilities of their possible comments/requests cannot be determined at this time, we propose to add Task 7.3 to provide supplemental funds to offset the need to request additional funds from RCTC. This contingency amount is to provide a factor of safety to handle unforeseen changes. This is a contingency amount only and is not based on any SOW and may not be sufficient. Prior to expending any effort on this Task, CH2M HILL will: 1. Advise RCTC of any stakeholder request that is beyond our SOW 2. Confirm with RCTC that the request is indeed beyond the SOW 3. Prepare a SOW and fee for the unforeseen work for RCTC approval 4. Receive written acceptance and NTP from RCTC of the SOW and Fee unforeseen work prior to beginning any said work 240 45 Al 1AU1-1N111',N 1 .i AMENDMENT 8 COST PROPOSAL RCTC SR 79 HILL Amendment 8 Cost Proposal Optional Tasks Cost Proposal $4,018,567 $475,507 Total Cost Proposal $4,494,074 • 5/28/2013 10:43 AM 241 Page 1 of 7 AMENDMENT 8 COST PROPOSAL RCTC SR 79 CH2NIHILL. LABOR Rate Hours Labor Cost Project Manager $107.75 1.224 $131,891.66 Environmental Task Lead $94.99 2,556 $242,793.56 Senior Environmental Advisor $88.17 410 $36,151.30 Senior Consultant/Technologist $67.21 4,214 $283,214.02 Senior Engineer $65.92 1,382 $91,097.88 Project Engineer $49.55 1,900 $94,148.47 Project Planner/Scientist $47.67 2,698 $128,607.96 Associate Engineer Associate Planner/Scientist $37.42 $46.80 334 4,328 $12,498.84 $202, 533.58 Technical Editor $44.86 2,404 $107,854.25 CADD $37.18 1,186 $44, 098.72 Database Administrator $35.31 484 $17, 090.32 Contracts/Procurement $36.53 162 $5,917.32 Administration $31.24 432 $13,497.60 Labor for Optional Tasks $60.00 3,434 $206, 067.00 SUBTOTAL 27,148 $1,617,462 Overhead $1,806,867 Fee 9% $308,190 Total Burdened Labor $3,732,519 Project Multiplier 2.308 EXPENSE and TRAVEL COSTS Expenses $138,334 Travel/Per Diem $1.7,600 SUBTOTAL $155,934 SUBCONTRACTORS (includes Labor, Expenses, Travel, and Per Diem) Applied Earthworks $309,218 Critigen $101,558 Geographics $8,500 Epic Land Solutions $186,342 SUBTOTAL $605,618 GRAND TOTAL $4,494,072 5/28/2013 10:43 AM 242 Page 2 of 7 LABOR Team Leader Project Manager (Prehistory) Project Manager (History) Field Supervisor Field/Lab Technician Supervisor/Tech Spec. VII Geomorphologist Prehistoric Archaeologist Tech. Spec. III Technician IV GIS Analyst Graphics Administrator Project Multiplier EXPENSE and TRAVEL COSTS Expenses Travel/Per Diem AMENDMENT 8 COST PROPOSAL RCTC SR 79 Subconsultant: Applied Earthworks Billing Rate $155.18 $104.94 $110.29 $94.39 $73.26 $94.39 $122.70 $77.33 $65.13 $73.26 $70.22 $70.22 $69.33 SUBTOTAL N/A Hours 792 396 120 80 40 133 20 700 32 100 137 116 174 2,840 Overhead Fee Total Burdened Labor SUBCONTRACTORS (includes Labor, Expenses, Travel, and Per Diem) SUBTOTAL TOTAL REQUEST Labor Cost $122, 902.56 $41,556.24 $13,234.80 $7,551.20 $2,930.40 $12,553.87 $2,454.00 $54,131.00 $2,084.16 $7,326.00 $9,620.14 $8,145.52 $12,063.42 CH2MHILL $296,553 Included in Billing Rate Included in Billing Rate $9,024 $3,641 $296,553 $0 $309,218 • 5/28/2013 10:43 AM 243 Page 3 of 7 LABOR Team Leader / GIS 2 Project Multiplier EXPENSE and TRAVEL COSTS Expenses Travel/Per Diem AMENDMENT 8 COST PROPOSAL RCTC SR 79 Subconsultant: Critigen Billing Rate $108.04 SUBTOTAL N/A Hours 940 940 Overhead Fee Total Burdened Labor Labor Cost $101, 557.60 HILL $101,558 Included in Billing Rate Included in Billing Rate $0 $0 $101,558 SUBTOTAL $0 SUBCONTRACTORS (includes Labor, Expenses, Travel, and Per Diem) SUBTOTAL $0 TOTAL REQUEST $101,558 5/28/2013 10:43 AM 244 Page 4 of 7 LABOR Website Coordination Project Multiplier EXPENSE and TRAVEL COSTS Expenses Travel/Per Diem AMENDMENT 8 COST PROPOSAL RCTC SR 79 Subconsultant: Geographics Billing Rate $85.00 SUBTOTAL N/A Hours 100 100 Overhead Fee Total Burdened Labor Labor Cost $8,500.00 H L included in Billing Rate Included in Billing Rate $0 $0 $8,500 $8,500= SUBTOTAL $0: SUBCONTRACTORS (includes Labor, Expenses, Travel, and Per Diem) SUBTOTAL $0 TOTAL REQUEST $8,500 5/28/2013 10:43 AM 245 Page 5 of 7 AMENDMENT 8 COST PROPOSAL RCTC SR 79 HILL Subconsultant: Epic Land Solutions LABOR Principal Project Manager ROW Cost Estimator GIS Manager Senior Agent Agent GIS Analyst Admin Project Controls Project Multiplier . EXPENSE and TRAVEL COSTS Expenses Travel/Per Diem Rate $67.31 $50.48 $60.00 $43.27 $35.00 $23.68 $19.23 $23.92 $38.00 SUBTOTAL N/A Hours 51 70 650 36 146 104 32 40 36 1,165 Overhead Fee Total Burdened Labor SUBTOTAL SUBCONTRACTORS (includes Labor, Expenses, Travel, and Per Diem) SUBTOTAL TOTAL REQUEST Labor Cost $3,432.81 $3,533.60 $39,000.00 $1,557.72 $5,110.00 $2,462.72 $615.36 $956.80 $1,368.00 185% 9% $5,100 $950 $58,037 $107,368 $14,886 $180,292 $6,050 $0 $186,342 5/28/2013 10:43 AM 246 Page 6 of 7 LL Task SR79 Realignment Amendment 8 Cost Proposal Hours Labor Labor Labor Overhead Subtotal Labor Fixed Expense Subs Travel Subtotal Fee Task Total Top Task A8 - Amendment 8 A8.01.01 - Project Management A8.01.02 - PDT Meetings A8.01.03 - Resource Agency Meetings A8.01.04 - Other Meetings A8.01.05 - Stakeholder Meetings A8.01.06 - Progress Reports/Invoicing A8.01.07 - QA/QC A8.01.08 - Landowner Access A8.01.10 - Proj Website/Newsletters/Etc. A8.02.04 - Final Agrmnt: Purpose & Need, Criteria, Alts A8.02.05 - LEDPA A8.02.06 - Prelim Agmt of Compl with Section 404(b)(1) A8.03.02 - Storm Water Data Report A8.03.06 - Traffic Analysis A8.03.10 - Cost Estimates A8.03,14 - Final Engineering A8.03.15 - Adv Planning Studies A8.03,17 - Right of Way Data Sheets A8.03.19.00 - Final PR Prep/Revision A8.03.19.01 - Fact Sheets (Mand & Adv) A8.05.02 - Final Reloc Impact Report A8.05.09 - Air Quality Tech Report A8.05.13.00 - MSHCP Equivalency Analysis A8.05.13.01 - DBESP A8.05.15 - Secion 106 and Cultural Resources A8.06.05.05 - Final EIS/EIR Public Noticing A8,06.06.02 - FP Encroach Only Practicable Finding A8.06.06.03 - Section 4(f) Eval A8.06.06.04 - Final EIS/EIR Prep A8,06.06.05 - Final EIS/EIR Circulation A8.06.08.01 - Conceptual Mitigation Plan A8.06.09 -Route Adoption A8,06,10 - NOD and ROD A8.06.11.01 - Project Management Plan A8.06.11.02 - Cost Estimate Review 918 64,181.88 1,161 88,215.12 312 25,871.20 320 22,342,04 804 52,963.02 648 27,270.84 160 14,081.80 200 7,399.40 426 21,259.84 136 8,535.84 560 33,123.52 240 13, 943.92 364 24,626.00 748 38,332.00 308 17,047.20 536 26,824.64 516 26,259.20 16 1,241.60 648 33,931.91 250 13,203.52 20 884.8 480 23,974.50 556 28,660.36 536 27,775.56 606 34,903.28 160 9,399.60 66 4,790.54 894 63,185.50 8,021 456,605.77 128 6,302.00 964 53,311.16 82 5,795.70 386 24,679.06 528 31,472.80 1,016.00 79,000.36 71,698.50 98,546.35 28,901.12 24,958.60 59,165.68 30,463.14 15,730.40 8,265.60 23,749.56 9,535.52 37,003.04 15,577.04 27, 510.96 42,820.72 19,043.92 29,965.80 29,335.04 1,387.04 37,905.92 14, 750.04 988.4 26,780.72 32,017.56 31,029.16 38, 991.24 10, 500.80 5,351.64 70,586.08 510,083.67 7,040.32 59,555.56 6,474.18 27,567.70 35,159.02 88,251.06 135,880.38 186, 761, 47 54,772.32 47,300.64 112,128.70 57,733.98 29, 812.20 15,665.00 45, 009.40 18,071.36 70,126.56 29, 520.96 52,136.96 81,152.72 36,091.12 56,790.44 55,594.24 2,628.64 71,837.83 27,953.56 1,873.20 50,755.22 60,677.92 58,804.72 73,894.52 19,900,40 10,142.18 133, 771.58 966,689,44 13,342,32 112,866,72 12,269.88 52,246.76 66,631.82 167,251.42 8,100 10,800 2,400 4,000 2,700 540 0 0 0 0 96 48 3,250 1,625 0 2,450 0 0 7,000 2,200 600 1,020 3,316 1,266 3,500 3,000 0 1,850 28,678 38,835 3,062 0 0 4,650 3,349 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,876 0 0 123,420 0 0 0 304,216 0 0 0 101,558 0 0 0 0 0 10,048 800 144, 780.38 5,000 202,561.47 2,500 59,672.32 800 52,100.64 1,600 116,428.70 O 58,273.98 0 29,812.20 0 15,665.00 0 53,509.40 0 18,071.36 0 70,222.56 O 29,568.96 0 55,386,96 500 83,277.72 0 36,091.12 0 59,240.44 0 55,594.24 O 60,504.64 0 78,837.83 0 30,153.56 0 125,893.20 0 51,775.22 0 63,993.92 0 60,070.72 0 381,610.52 0 22,900.40 O 10,142.18 0 135,621.58 0 1,096,925.04 O 52,177.32 0 115,928.72 O 12,269.88 0 52,246.76 0 71,281.82 6,400 187,048.22 12,229.23 16,808.52 4,929.52 4,257.06 10,091.58 5,196.05 2,683.10 1,409.85 4,050.85 1,626.42 6,311.39 2,656.89 4,692.33 7,303.74 3,248.20 5,111.13 5,003.48 236.58 6,465.40 2,515.82 168.59 4,567.97 5,461.01 5,292.42 6,650.51 1,791.04 912.8 12,039.44 87,002.07 1,200.81 10,158.00 1,104.29 4,702.21 5,996.86 15,052.63 157,009.61 219,369.99 64,601.84 56,357.70 126,520.28 63,470.03 32,495.30 17,074.85 57,560.25 19,697.78 76,533.95 32,225.85 60,079.29 90,581.46 39, 339.32 64,351.57 60,597.72 60,741.22 85, 303.23 32,669.38 126,061.79 56,343.19 69,454.93 65,363.14 388,261.03 24,691.44 11,054.98 147,661.02 1,183,927,11 53,378.13 126, 086.72 13,374.17 56, 948.97 77, 278.68 202,100.85 07 - Optional Task Contingency Subtotal for A8 23,714 $1,411,395 $1,576,691 $2,988,087 $138,334 $605,618 $17,600 $3,749,639 $268,928 $4,018,567 206,058 230,187 39,262 - 475,507 5/28/24 Grand Total 23,714 $1,617,453lik 878 $2,988,087 $138,334 $605,618 $17,600 $3,749,639 $308,190gill 494,074 age 7 of 7 Detailed Progress Update Through April 3, 2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission: State Route 79 Realignment Project Print Date: 03-Apr-1307:23 Sheet 1 of 5 Project Report Draft Pe+ A03-0015 A03 -0016 A03 -0017 A03-0018 A03-0019 A03-0020 A03-0021 A03-0022 A03-0023 A03-0024 A03-0026 A03-0026E A03-0026F A03-0026G A03-0026H A03-00261 A03-0026J_ A03-0026K A03-0030 A03-0027A A03-0027B A03-0027C A03-0027D A03-0027E A,03-0027F A03-0027G A03-102711 A03-0027I A03.-0027J A03-0027K A0370027L A03-0027M A03-0027N Repot-41- 160.15.20 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160. 15.2 5 160.15.25 ets 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160..15.25 160..,15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 160.15.25 A03 00270 160 15 25 1410 ,4,0 i Re r A03-0100 180.05.05 A03-0105 180.05.10 A03-0110 180.05.10 A03-0.115 180.05.10 A03-0120 180.05.10 t1**: �tg tudi( s A03-0048 160.10.25 A03-0060_ _ 160.10.85 A03-0,090160.10_10 A03-0095 160.10.10 A03-0130 _... A03-0132 A03-0,135 AO 0140, 160.10.10 A03 0142, 160.10.10 A03-0144_ 160.10.10 _ A03-0146 160.10.10 Draft Project Report Proiect Report Pre -Submittal Caltrans Review of PR Pre -Submittal PR Review Comments Incorporated by CH Caltrans Comment on Staging Analysis Rpt Caltrans 5-day Screen Check CH Revise DPR (including NADR) Caltrans Review Draft Project Report CH Revise Draft Project Report District 8 Env Review CH Revise Draft Project Report • Revise DPR to be consistent with DED • CH Submit revised DPR and RTC table to D8 00 . Caltrans review DPR • CH revise DPR and resubmit • Caltrans R/W comments received . CFI revise DPR" per R/W comments Caltrans final review DPR Caltrans Approval of Draft PR 0 Fact Sheet Submittal • Caltrans review fact sheets CH revise and resubmit fact sheets Caltrans review and comment on Fact Sheets . CH Revise Fact Sheets . . Caltrans review revised fact sheets • CT workshow with HQ geometrician • CT engineering workshop, . Provide range of alternatives to support alignr 1 • Caltrans review background material . • Caltrans provide direction on fact sheets • CH revise and resubmit fact sheets , • Caltrans review revised fact sheets CH revise and resubmit fact sheets Caltrans approval of fact sheets 300 100 20 40 20 5 15 30. 30,, 15 20 14 14 5 5 1 5 Engineering - Final, PR_._ . Caltrans Review Final PR . CH Revise Final PR . Caltrans Review Final PR PR Final. Acceptance Prepare Final SWDR Borings for Advance Planning Studies,_ , Phasing Analysts _ .,, Identification of Design Option .. MWD Borings 'Prepare Geotech Report for MWD Finalize_ Geotech Report for MWD__ Prepare Updated Traffic Report RCTC/Caltrans Review „Traffic Report, CH Address Comments Caltrans Confirm No Changes. Re. uired 10 20 10 14 . 10 1 14 1 14 28 14 90 30 30 30 10' 3096 113 35 760 43 16 113 57 155 311 311 36 I1-Aug-04 A 12-.411-07 A 02-Nov-07 A 07-Dec-07 A 12-.Ian-09 A 05-Jan-10 A 21-.Ian-10 A 17-May-10 A 14-,1u1-10 A 17-Dec-10 A 25-Oct-I1 A 07-Nov-12 A 23 17-Dec-12 A 1 10-Jan-13 A 10 14-Jan-13 A 0 24-Jan-13 A 6 25-Jan-I3 A 0 09-May-12 A 21 10-May-12 A 48 01-Jun-12 A 47 20-Jul-12.A 11 06-Sep-12 A 14 18-Sep-12 A 0 09-Oct-12 A 0 28-Nov-12 A 0 26-Mar-13 A 7 27-Mar-13 A 0 09-Apr-13 0 10-Apr-13 0; 24-Apr-13 022-Mav-13 0 01-Sep-13 0 30-Nov-13 0'30-Dec-13 0, 29-Jan-14 0 08-Feb-15 01-Feb-13 A 01-Nov-07 A 06-Dec-07 A 04-,Ian-10 A 23-Feb-09 A 20-Jan-10 A 13-May-10 A 13-1u1-10 A 16-Dec-10 A 24-Oct-1.1 A. 31-Aug-12 A_ 13-Dec-I2 A 14-Dec-12 A 09-Jan-13 A 11-Jan-13 A 24-Jan-13 A 24-Jan-,13 A 31-Jan-13 A 01-Feb-_1.3 A 09-May- 12 A : 31-Mav-12 A 19-Jul-12 A 05-Sep-12 A 17-Sep-12 A 02-Oct-12 A 09-Oct- 12 A _ 100% 28-Nov-12 A 100% 26-Mar-13 A... 100% 09-Apr-13 501/0 100% 100% t00% 100% 100% 100% 100% !00% l00% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 09-Apr-13 23 -Apr-13 .. 21-May-13_ 04-Jun-13.... 04-Jun-13 29-Nov-13 , 29-Dec-13 28-Jan-14 27-Feb-14 . 17-Feb-15 .. , 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0%, 0% 0% 0%0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10 0 20-Nov-13 29 Nov 13 0% 40� 0 087-Jun-13 17-Jul-13 0% 30 __ ,,, 43 05-Dec-08 A , 16-Jan-09 A _ l00% 601 150, 27-Jan-09_A 25-Jun-09 A 100% 5 , 142 26-May-09 A ' _1.4-Oct-09 A 100% 601 1901 15-Oct-09 A ; 22-Apr-10 A 100% _14 , _41, 15-Jul-10 A 247Aug71.0 A _ 100% 45 , , 43 26-Oct-09 „A , 07 Dec 09 A 100% _301._„ 44' 08-Dec-09 A, 20-Jan-10,A, 100% 301 26 21-Jan-10 A 15-Feb-10 A I 100% 10!,_ 22 16-Feb-.10_A 09-Mar-10 A 100% StudyArea/Landowner • Access/Project Description r Prepare and Submit ROE Request for Ph 2 Access 14 16.f27 Aug712 A „ 12 Sep 12 A „ Response Period 30 130 13 Sep-12 A ,21 Jan 13 A Tribal Agreement of Monitoring Agreement 40, 141 03-Sep-12 A . 22-Jan-13 A A05 2020, A05-2140. A05-2150 100% 100..% 100% 7. 200 9. 2©1 Project Report Pre -Submittal Caltrans Review of PR Pre -Submittal PR Review Comments Incorporated by CH Mi Caltrana Comment on Staging Analysis Rpt Caltrans 5-day Screen Check . H Revise DPR (including NADR) Caltrans Review Draft Project Report . CH Revise Draft Project Report District 8 Env Rev �f CH 0 20I4 raft Project Report 20.t5 w revise Draft Project Report Revise DPR to be consistent with DED CH Submit revise_ d DPR and RTC table to D8 • Caltrans review DPR . CH revise DPR and resubmit • Caltrans R/W comments received CH revise DPR per R/W comments Caltrans final review DPR 'Caltrans Approval of Draft PR Fact S aet Si.. i u,lt•ans -eveviewew fact sheets CH re ise and resubmit fact sheets -1.-. CaInns review and comment on Fact Sheets CH Revise Fact Sheets Ca Fans review revised fact sheets CI workshow with HQ geometrician . CT engineering workshop Provide range of alternatives to support alignment Caltrans review background material Calt ans provide direction on fact shee . CH revise and resubmit fact s Caltrans review revised fact shoe CH revise and resubmit fact eetsA Caltrans approval of tkact she Engineering - Final P&►=1 Caltrar s Review Fin iI P . CH Rev 3e Fi tal P . Caltrans Review Final P PR Final Prepare Fir4 SWDR 0-4- Borings for Advance Planning 3tudie M Phasing Analysis Identification of Des gn Option MWD Borings P`-epare Geotech Report for MWD MI F nalize Geotech Report for NW D Prepare Updated Traffic Report ROTC/Caltrans Review Traffic Report CH Addre 3s Comments Caltrans Confirm No Changes Required Pre pare �T Acceptance6-€1 and Submit ROE Request for Ph 2 Access Response Period bal Agreement cif Monitorir g Agreement 248 Detailed Progress Update Through April 3, 2013 Environmental Technical Studies A05-0180 A05-0230... A05. 0 .50 A05, 70300 A05-0660 A05-0699 ........... A05-0800 A05-0839 A05..-0900 A05-0924 A05-0925A A05-1500 A05-1550 A05-2100.. A05-2130 A05-0060 A05-0063 A05-0064 A05-0066 A05-0070 A05-0071 A05-0072 A05-0073 A05-0074 A05-0075A A05-007513 A05-0076 A05-0076A A05-0076B A05-00760 A05-0076D A05-0077 A05-0078 A05-0079_ A05-0080, A05-0081 A05 0082 A05-0084 A05-0086 A05-0086A A05-0086B • _A05-0086C A05-0087A A05-0087B A05-0087C A05-0088A A05-0088B A05-0088C A05-0088D A0570088E A05-0088F A05-0088G A05-0089A A05-00,89B A0.5-0089C A05-0089D A05-0089E 65.15.20 INATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY • 65.15,20. 1 Prep.are._Final 65.10.15 COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT _ 65.10.15 , Prepare Final __,65,20.05.05_ AREA OF POTENTIAL ,EFFECT MAP_ • 165.20.05.051 Prepare Final 165.20.2.0.. HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVAL.._REPORT 65.20.05.05 Prepare, Final 65.20.25.15 .HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT_ , 65.2,0.25.15 Distribute HPSR to Interested Parties , 165.20.25.15 SHPO Eligibility Concurrence 65.10.25 'NOISE TECHNICAL STUDY • 65.10.25 . .. Prepare Final Noise Technical Report 65.10.50 NOISEABATEMENT DECISION REPORT • 65.10.50 Prepare Final NADR 165.25.05 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.25 165.25.20 165.25.25 165.25.25 _ ,- 165.25.20 165.25.20.. 165.25.20..._. 165.25.20_ 165,.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20_ 165,25.20, 1.65 25.20, 165.25.20. 165.25.20 165.2520 165.25.20 165.25.20 , 165.25,.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 Riverside County Transportation Commission: State Route 79 Realignment Project 370i 1043 02-Nov-.0.6..A ' 09-Sep-09_A 14 87 16-Mar-10A 10-Ju,n,I0_A. 280 607: 02-Nov-06 A . 30-Jun-08 A 7 3 30-Aug-,10_A.,_ - 01-Sep-10 A 16 16 02-Nov-06 A, 17-Nov-06 A _,i, 71 9 17-Mar-10 A 25-Mar-10 A 230 271 02-Nov-06 A 30-1u1-07 A • 7 29' 25-Mar-10 A 22-Apr-10 A 30 27 04-Mar-09 A 307Mar709 A 100% 1' 8 18-Jun-10 A 25-1un-10 A 100% 30 37: 28-Jun-10 A 03-Aug-10 A _ 100% 268„ 622 02-Nov-06 A 15-Jul-08 A 100% 7 4 26-Jul-10 A 29-Jul-10 A 100% 21„ 42 24-Feb-10 A 067Apr-.10_A 100% 7.!. 10 26-Jul-10 A 04-Aug-10 A 100%. j_Prepare Admin Draft EIR/EIS Chapters 1, & 2 RCTC Technical Review Ch 1-2 District 8 Screencheck Review Ch 1-2 District 8 Technical &.NEPA Review,Ch 1-2 Prepare Admin Draft EIR/EIS Remainipg,Chapters Incorporate Phasing into EIR/EIS CH Respond. to. Comments/Revise for Options RCTC & D8 Preliminary Review_ RCTC & D8 Technical Review Prepare Report Addenda for Design Dptions Prepare EIR/EIS Sections with Option Data RCTC & D8 Internal OC Review .... _ Hold meetings regarding 4(f) resources D8 Provide Direction...on Construction Emission CH Complete AnalysisJWrite New EIR Text D8 Review/Approve Construction Emissions' CH Respond to D8 Comments D8 Follow -Up QC Review CH Respond to Comments_ CH, & Commentors, Comment Resolution _D,8, Check of Review_Cgmments CH Print Document for,HQ/Legal Review D8, DEA, Legal Review Period • CH Revise per HQ/Legal review comments_ _ • Final Resubmittal of Chapters 1 & 2 • Submit Chapter 3 Growth to .Caltrans _ Caltrans,Review Growth and .Provide Response, CH revise text per Caltrans comments_ , 1. CH prepare Print Preview Draft EIR/EIS , ,. - Print/Delivery copies of Draft EIR/EIS to Cal , RCTC Submits DED. for D8 Review D8 Review/send comments to DED to RCTC/C RCTC/CH rev iews/respond,s,to Comments," Workshop toresolve District comments , CH incorporate comments and _format D8 Review electronnic copy of DED CH printing D8 submits to HQ (1st review) HQ 1st Review . HQ compiles comments . ._D8 review HQ comments . . . D8 sends HQ comments to RCTC/CH • 36 82 03-Mar-08 A 23-May-08 A 100% 51 28 27-May-08 A 2371un-08 A 100% 10 .. 44 27-May-08 A 09-Jul-08 A 100% 45 118 10-Jul-08 A 04-Nov-08 A 100%0. 130 186 26-Aug-08 A 27-Feb-09 A 100% 30 29 19-Jan-09 A 16-Feb-09 A 100% 60, 394 17-Aug-09 A 147Sep-10 A 100% 5 : 4 02-Mar-09 A 05-Mar-09 A 100% 45 ; 81 09-Mar-09 A 28-May-09 A 100% 60 309 02-Nov-09 A 06-Sep-10 A 100% 40 195 24-Feb-10 A 06-Sep-10 A 100% 35 190 15-Sep-I0A 24-Mar-11 A 100% 10 37 15-Dec-10 A 20-Jan-1 I A 100% 1 1 24-Mar-II A 24-Mar-II A 100% 15 14 24-Mar-11 A 07-Apr-11 A 100% 14 17 08-Apr-11 A 25-Apr-11 A 100% 32 182 28-Oct-10 A 28-Apr-11 A 100% 18 91 29-Apr-11 A 29-Jul-11 A 100% 20 99 09-Jun-11 A 16-Sep-11 A 100% 15, 79 13-Jun-II A 31.7Aug-11 A 100% 14 15 1.9-Sep-11 A 03-Oct-11 A 100% 10 7 04-Oct-11 A 11-Oct-1 l A 100% 30 37 12-Oct-11 A 18-Nov-11 A 100% 30 278' 18-Nov-I I A 22-Aug-12 A 100% 1 0.13-Jul-12 A 13-Jul-12 A 100%. 1 008-Aug-12 A 08-Aug-12 A. 100% 10 13 09-Aug-12 A 227A.ug-12 A KO%e 20-! 21 03-Aug-12 A 247Aug-12 A 100% 3 2 27-Aug-12 A 29-Aug-12 A 100% 2 1 30-Aug-12 A 31-Aug-12 A 100% 0, 0 31-Aug-12 A 100% 21_ 21 , 31-Aug-12 A 20-Sep712 A : 1, 00% 11 -„ .. 7 21-Sep-12 A 28-Sep-12 A 100% 2i"„ 2 24-S,eo-12 A_,- 257Sep-12 A_100% 7' 5;26-Sep-12 A.... 01-Oct-12_A...,., 100% 2 0. _02-Oct-12 A 02-Oct-12 A 100% 4 _ 1' 02-Oct-12 A 03-Oct-I.2 A 100% 01 _." " 0 _04-Oct-12 A 100% 301 31, 05-Oct-12 A 05-Nov-12 A , 100% l 0 06-Nov-12 A 06-Nov-12 A 100% l . 13 07-Nov-12 A, ; 20-N. ov-12 A 100% 1 0 21-Nov-12 A 21-Nov-12 A - 100% 100% 100% MI Prepare Final 100% COMMUN' TY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 100% 100%F POTENTIAL EFFEC—MAP 100% I Prepare rival 100% II HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVAL. REPORT .......... 100% ■ Pre Dare Final ■ HISTORIC PROPERTY 'SURVEY REPORT Dist ibute HPSR to Interested P SHPO Eligibility Concurrence NOISE TECHNICAL STUDY Print Date: 03-Apr-1307:23 NATURAL ENV RONMENTAL STUDY Prepare Final Prepare Final Noise Technical 1•1/0ISE ABATEMENT DECISION REP Prepare Final NADR M. Prepare Adm n Draf EIR/EIS Chapters 1 & 2 -0-11 RCTC T;chicaI Review Ch 1-2 District 8 Screencheck Review Ci 1-2 District 8 Technical & NEPH Review Ch 1-2 repare Admin Draft EIR/r,IS ,Remaining Chapters Incorporate Phasing in1 ElR/EIS CH Respond to Comments/ RCTC & D8 Preliminary Review ZCTC & D8 Techrical Review Prepare RepertAddenda for Prepare EIR/ IS Sections wit RC'-'C & D8 Intern -►, Hold meetings regardi 8 Provide Directi . D 4. CH Complete Anai D8 Review/Appro H Respond to D8 C D8 Follow -Up Q J CH Respon H & Commen D8 Check of CH Print Doc D8. DEA, L J Sheet 2 of 5 e vi e fot Opt ons es gb Cptions Option Data 1 Q Rev ew 4 "f resources o Cor struetion Emissions kis Write New E1RText C oast action Emissions Text mments R v eve to Comutenls ors Cmnrienl Resolution ev' �w Cc mrr ents -ne fo HQ/Legal Reviety 7a Rev ew Period CH Revise per HQ/Legal review comments Final R2submittal of Chapters 1 & 2 Subm t Chapter 3 Growith to Caltrans Cahn_ s Review Growth and Provide Responses H re vi: e text per Caltrans comment> . F prepare Print Preview Draft E R/EIS . Print Delivery coppies;of Draft EIR/EIS to Caltrans RCTC St bm is DED for 08 Review D8 eview/send comments to DED to RCTC/CH RCTC/CH reviews/responds to Comments Workshop to resolve 'District comments CH :ncarporate comments and fbrmat D8 Review electronroc copy of DED CH printing • I Sub nits to HQ (1st review) H) 1s.Review H) compiles comments D3 review HQ comments D 3 seeds HQ comments to RCTC/CH 249 Detailed Progress Update Through April 3, 2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission: State Route 79 Realignment Project Print Date: 03-Apr-1307:23 Sheet 3 of 5 A05-0090A A05-0090B A05-0090C A05-0090D A05-0090E A05-0090F A05-0090G A05-0090H A05-009.01 A05-0090J A05-0090K A05-0090L A05-0090M A05-0090N A05-00900 A05-0090P A05-0096 A05-0130 A05-0132. A05-0133 A05-0135 A05-0140 A05-0145 A05-0146A A05-0146B A05-0146C A05-0150. A05-0155 A09-1060 A09-1062 A09-1064 A09-1066 A09-1068 A09-1070 A09-1075 Fina0)t A06-00 l0 A06-0020 A06-0030 A06-0050. A06-0052. A06-0055 A06-0058 A06-0060 A06-0061 A06-0062 A06„-0063 A06-0064,_.. A06-0065 A06 0070.. A06-0080 A06 0090 1 iu .016 trca A09-1100 A09-1105 A09-1110_.. A09-1115 A09-1.120 A09-1125 105.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20 165.25.20, 175.05 175.05.15 175,05.15 17505.1.5 1.75.05.,1.5. 175.05.10 175.05.15 175.05.15 175.05.15 175.10.35 175.10.35 °Activity i)esciipti D8/RCTC/CH review/draft responses to HQ com RCTC submits DED for D8 review D8 review electronic copy.of DED D8 submits comments to RCTC CH incorporates comments and format RCTC submits DED for HQ review HQ Review . HQ compiles comments and sends to D8 D8 sends HQ comments to RCTC CH incorporates comments and format RCTC submits DED for 08 review D8 submits comments to RCTC CH incorporates comments and format RCTC submits DED for D8 review D8 reviews and submits comments to RCTC CH incorporate comments and format D8 Approve/Submit Signature Page_ _ CH Print Draft EIR/EIS for Distribution D8 Submits letter to EPA for publication in Fed Re; Submit review copies to Calrans, RCTC, libraries .. Submit NOC and DED to State Clearinghouse . • Submit NOC to County Clerk„ .Publish Notice of Availability,_ in Federal Register Ship hard copies, CD and letters to distribution list Email to distribution list Postcards mailed for hearing Draft EIR/EIS Public Review & Public Hearings Public Open House Hearings t On terms - 180.10.05.35 Prepare. Draft Air Quality Conformity Document 180.10.05.35 RCTC & District 8 Preliminary Review 180.10.05.35 RCTC &. District 8 Review 180.10.05.35 ;CH Revise & Incorporate Public Comments 180.10.05.35 "CaMansReview/Approve Report Edits 180.10.05.35 , Prepare Final 180.10.05.35 FHWA Final Conformity Determination 175.15 CH/RCTC/Caltrans Initial„Review of Comments 175.15 CH Develop Response to,Comments 175.15 Caltrans Review Draft EIS/EIR Responses 180.10.05.05 Prepare Final EIR/EIS 180.10.05 Caltrans D8 Review Final EIR/E..IS 180.10.05 180.10.05 _180.10.05 18..0..10.05 180.10.05 180.10.05 180.10.05 180.10.05 175.05.10 180.10.10 180.10 10 ton iOpt 180.10.05.35 Prepare Final Relocation Impact Report _ 18"0.10.05.35 ,RCTC& District 8 Preliminary" Review, 180.10.05.35 RCTC & District 8 Review 180.10.05.35 CH Revise _& Incorporate Public Comments 180.10.05.35 Caltrans Review/Approve Report Edits ...... 180.10.05_._35_^,Prepare Final Resolve Comments on Final EIR/EIS,_Prepare NO/ , Caltrans 08 Review Final,FIR/EIS_,,, HQ/Legal_Review Final EIR/EIS HQ Transmit Comments to District ....... „ Resolve Comments/Revise Final FIR/EIS ......... ....... District Review Revised Final EIR/EIS Hq..Pre-Approval Review_ Approve Final EIR/EIS , Circulate NOA Publish NOA Final EIR/EIS Circulation & Approval Orig Dur etua l Du ion .Apr, 3, 2413 "Apr;;3,, tDl elate start Update 6 4 26-Nov-12 A 30-Nov-12 A 1 0 03-Dec-12 A 03-Dec-12 A I 1 04-Dec-12 A 05-Dec-l2 A I 0 05-Dec-12 A 05-Dec-12 A 5 5 06-Dec-12 A 11-Dec-12 A 1 0 11-Dec-12 A I1-Dec-12 A 5 8 12-Dec-12 A 20-Dec-12 A I 0 21-Dec-12 A 21-Dec-12 A 1 0 26-Dec-I2 A 26-Dec-I2 A 2 127-Dec-12 A 28-Dec-12 A I 0 31-Dec-12 A 31-Dec-l2 A 1 0 02-.Ian-13 A 02-Jan-13 A 5 4 04-Jan-13 A 08-Jan-13 A 1 0 09-Jan-13 A 09-.Ian-13 A 5 19 10-Jan-13 A 29-Jan-13 A 2 0 30-Jan-13 A 30-.Ian-13 A 2 0 31-Jan-13 A 31-Jan-13 A 5 5 01-Feb-13 A 06-Feb-l3 A 0 0 01-Feb-13 A 1 0 06-Feb-13 A 06-Feb-13 A 1 1 07-Feb-13 A 07-Feb-l3 A 0 0 07-Feb-13 A 0 0 07-Feb-13 A 1 1 08-Feb-13 A 08-Feb-13 A 1 1 08-Feb-I3 A 08-Feb-13 A 1 1 08-Feb-13 A 08-Feb-13 A 45 54 08-Feb-13 A 08-Apr-13 2 2 26-Feb-13 A 27-Feb-13 A 30 5 45 _30 30 14 20: 60 45. 30 90 30 30 14 30. 1 30 5 14 10 15 0 08-.tun-13 0 08-Jul-13 0 13-Jul- l3 0 27-Aug-13 0 26-Sea-13 0 26-Oct-13 0 09-Nov-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09-Apr- 13 . 18-Jun-13 02-Aug-13 11-Dec-13 1 l -Mar-14 10-Apr-14 10-May-14 24-May- 14 23-Jun-14 24-Jun-14 24-Jul-14 29-Jul,-1.4. l2-Aug-14 22-Aug-14 • 07-J ul43... _ 12-Jul-13 26. Aug ,_13. 25-Sep-13 ' 25-Oct-13 08-Nov-13 28-Nov-13 07-Jun-13_ O1-Aug-13 3l-Aug-l3 10-Mar-14 09-Apr- I4, 0.9.7Mav714 23 -May-14 22-Jun-14 237Jun7.14 _ 23 -Ju I-14 28-Jul-14 i l -Aug-14 21-Aug-14 05-Sep-l4 ,05.-Sep-14 06-Sep-14 0..5 Oct-_14 30 0 01-Sep-13 30-Sep713 5- 0,01,-Oct-13, , , 05-Oct-13, ," 45 0 06-Oct-13.. 1,9-Nov-13 30... 0 20-Nov-13 19-Dec-1_3. 30 0 20-Dec-13 `18-Jan-14 14. 0. 19-Jan-14 Ol Feb_14,,. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ]00% 100% 100%_ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% _. 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% _0% J7 Q3 L44 0 Qx10 [04° 9 Q-1.Q4 Ql I Q2 14" ;° 2Q11 P1142IQ3"IQ4. Qi 2Q;L2, • 201"S 2 6 ;-, Q"1'42 Q3IQ4 Q1 Q2143 Q4 Q11Q2 Q:M:Q4 Q1IQ2 D /1 CT /CH review/draft responses to HQ comments tCTI submits DEAD for D8 review 8 review electronic copy of DED 8 s bmits comments to RC—C H i corporates Comments and format ACT submits DFD for HQ review HQ eview . HQ ompiles comments and sends to D8 . D8 sends HQ comments to RCTC . CH ncorporates'pomments and format ZC C submits DED for D8 review 1 D8 ubmits comments to RCTC CH incorporates comments and format I RC C submits DED for D8 review ■ . D: reviews and; submits cc mments to RCTC 1 . C incorporate:comments and format C 8 A prove/Submit Signature Page 41 C-1 P int Draft EIR/EIS for Distribution -ti > 3 S omits letter tip EPA for publication in Fed Reg 1 ubm't review copies to Calrans, RCTC, libraries ub it NOC and DED to Sta e Clearinghouse ub it NOC to COnty Clerk • Publi h Notice of Availability in Federal Register �I f hip and copies, CD and letters to distribution list ►I Enai to distribution list Post yards mailed torhearing -.4°Dr ft EIR/EIS Public Revie w & Public Hearings 00bl c Open House Hearings Prepare Draft Air Quality Conformity Dozune ■ RCTC & District 8 Preliminary Re -vie RCTC & District E Re v t !� CH Revise & Incorporate Public Cam Oen Caltrans Review/Approve 2e�ot E: Pre m ie Fi FHWA Final Conformity Detrpina CH/RCT C/Caltrans Initial Review of Comrren CH Develop Response to Comm ■! Caltrans Review Draft EIS/EIR Respotsei r Prepare Filc 1 El El Caltrans D8 Review "in. Resolve Comments on Final FIR&IS, P - Caltrans D8 Rev`dw F HQ/Legg Re‘ E w ' HQ Transmit :_ qmm Resolve Comme- ts, P tvis: District Review f.Quis= HC Pee A ipro (o Final FIR/EIS 7cu El' par n al final nts Fin, : Fi . pr: e Fi Ci El NO IR/EI IRE( o D istri i l E[R/E al LIR/ECI; al ley e; I� 3IR/S'�" ulate NQ ubl sh NOA alis, & App ov'�_ Prepare Final Relocation Impact Repo RCTC & District 8 Preliminary levie RCTC & District 3 0,evie CH Revise & Incorporate Pt,blic Commen Caltrans Review/Approve Report Edi ?`,`pare Fir a 250 All-0208.. 165.20.15.25 All-0210 _ 165.20.15.25 Al 1 165.20.15.25 A11-0225 _ 165.20.15.25 A1170230 165.20.15.25 A11-0235 165.20.15.25 A 11-0240 165.20.15.25 A 11-0245 A 11-0255 All-0260 Al . .......... . A11-0310 A11-0320 A 11-0325 _.... A 1170327 A 11-0330 A11-0335 A11-0340 A 11-0350 ... ....... .. A_l 1-0360 A 11-03 70 _ A11-0420 A 11-043..0. A 11-0440 A 11-0450 A 11-0460 A 11-0470 A11-0480 A11-0490 Detailed Progress Update Through April 3, 2013 A06-0500 175.20 PDT Mtg for Inital Consideration_ of Pref Alt _A06-0510,_„ _ 175,20 •Resource, Agency Mtg for Evaluation of LEDPA„ A06 ,0529 _„_2_175,20 _. ,__, , :PDT Mtg for Final, Selection of Pref Al, A06-0550 175.20 Approval of Preferred Alternative/LEDPA Phase 2 Archaeological Excavation Al 1-0010_ 165.20.15._10.! PHASE II EVALUATION PROPOSAL A1170012 165.20.15.10 Native Amer. Consultation - Site Treatment A11-0020, 165.2Q._L5,10 , RCTCA District &_Preliminary Review _ A11-0030 165.20.15.10 RCTC & District 8 Review A1170040 165.20.15.10 CH Revise A 11-0042 1.65.20.15.10 . _District 8 Review .......... A11-0043_. 165.20.15.10 CH Revise A1-0044 165.20.15.10 !. Caltrans Provide Transmittal Letters A11,70050 . 165.20.15.10,4 Native American Review All-0052 , „_; 165.20.15,10 ;. ,_Coordinate Response, to Tribes with Caltrans _ Al 1-0060 165.20.15.10 ' CH Revise AEP for Preferred Alternative Al 1 0070, 165.20.15.10 Caltrans Review/Approve Report Edits A11 0080 165.20.15.10 Prepare Final A1.1-0100 , 165.20.15.,15_,Phase II Mobilization - Common Sites, .. A1,1-01,10 165.20.15.15 ;Phase 11 Fieldwork„- Common Sites .., A11-0120_ ! 165.20.15.20 Phase 11 Lab Work -Common Sites A11-0150.. ; 165.20.15.15 , Phase I1 Mobilization - Final Site All-01.60,,,. 1165.20.15.15 ;.Phase 11 Fieldwork,- Final Site A1170170, 165.20.15.2Q „Phase 11 Lab Work,_ -Final Site A1170200 165.20.15.25 -AER A11-0205 165.20.15.25 =. RCTC & District 8 Courtesy Review A11-0206 165.20.15.25 . Resolve Comments Received on Draft Report A11-0207. 165.20.15.25 , MCP/SHPO Letter Review CH Revise AER for Final Site CH Revise/Add Preferred Alternative„... RCTC & District & Preliminary Review RCTC & District 8 Review CH Revise Caltrans Review Native American Review (with HPSR), 165.20.15,25 . CH Revise/Resolve Comments 165.20.15.25 Caltrans Review/Approve Report, Edits, 165.20.15.25 Prepare Final 165.20.15.25 i SUPPLEMENTAL HPSR 165.20.1525. . 165._20.15..2.5 16520.1.5.25 165 20 15.25 . 1652015 25 1.65.20.15.25 . 165.20.15.25 165.20.15.25,.1 165.20.15.25.' RCTC & District & Preliminary Review RCTC, &, District 8 Review CH Revise Caltrans Review Native American Review , CH_Revise/Resolve Comments Caltrans Review/Approve Report Edits Prepare Final _. Caltrans Submit .to_SHPO 165.20.25.15 SHPO.Eligibility Concurrence 165.20.25.20 FINDING OF EFFECT 1.65.20.25.20 RCTC & District & Preliminary Reviev 165.20.25.20 = RCTC & District 8 Review 165;20.25.20_ CH Revise _ 165.20.25.20 CaltransReyiew/Approve Report Edits 165.20.25.20 , __Prepare Final 165.20.25.20 Caltrans Submit to HQ/SHPO 165.20.25.20 SHP() Concurrence l; 1 9.0._ 45 5 45 30 15 5 2 30 30 14 5, 1410 45 120 14 10 80 120 30 20 30 60 2.0 ; 5 30 30 30 30 30 5. 14 30 5 30 30 30 30 30 5.; , 14 .1.......:4: . _304 30 5 30i 15' 5 14 14 30 Riverside County Transportation Commission: State Route 79 Realignment Project 0 02-May-13* 02-May713 O.;23,May713* 23-May,-_13 0106 Jun-13* 06 Jun-1.3_ 0 07-Jun-I3 730 23-Sep-08 A 22-Sep-10 A. 1_00% 42 14-Sep-09 A 25-Oct-09 A, ,. 100% 40 .23-Sep-10 A 0I -Nov-10 A _ 100% 133 04-Nov-10 A 17-Mar-11 A 100% 25 18-Mar-11 A 12-Apr-11 A 100% 15 13-Apr-11 A 28-Apr-11 A 100% 7 29-Apr-11 A 06-May-11 A 10.0.% 6 05-May-11 A 11-May-11 A 100% 67 12-May-11 A 18-Jul-11 A 100% 44 19-1u1-11 A 01-Sep-11 A 100% 0 08-Jun-13 21-Jun-13 0% 0 22-Jun-13 26-Jun-13 0% 0, 27-Jun-13 10-Jul-13 0% 11 29-Aug-11 A 09-Sep-11 A 100% 14 12-Sep-11 A 26-Sep-11 A . 100% 97'27-Sep-11 A 02-Jan-12 A 100% 3 22-.tan-13 A 25-Jan-13 A 100% 2 28-Jan-13 A. 30-Jan-13 A 100% 62 31-Jan-13 A 28-Apr-13. 0% 150 03-Oct-11 A 01-Mar-12 A 100% 35 02-Mar-12 A 06-Apr-12 A 100% 171 09-Apr-12 A 27-Sep-12 A 100% 187 28-Sep-12 A 12-Apr-13 0% 0 29-Apr-13 27-Jun-13 0% 0 08-Jun-13 27-Jun-13 0% 0 28-Jun-13 02-Jul-13 0% 0 03-Jul-13 01-Aug-13 0% 0 02-Aug-13 31-Aug-13 0% 0 01-Sep-13 30-Sep-13 0% 0 11-Oct-13 09-Nov-13. 0% 0 10-Nov-13 09-Dec-13 0% 0 10-Dec-13 14-Dec-13 0% 0 15-Dec-13 28-Dec-13 0%. 0 08-Jun-13 07-Jul-13 0% 0 08-Jul-13 12-Jul-13 0% 0.13-J.u1-13 11-Aug-13 0% 0 12 -Aug-13 10-Sep-13 0% 0 11-Sep-13 10-Oct-13 0% 0' 11-Oct-13 09-Nov-1_3 .. 0% 010-Nov-13 09-Dec-13.... 0% 0 10-Dec-13 14-Dec-1.3...... 0% 0 15-Dec-13 28-Dec-13 0% 0 29-Dec-13 11-Jan.-14 0% 0 12-Jan-14 10-Feb-14 0% 011-Oct-13 09,-Nov-13 0% 0 10-Nov-13.. 14-Nov-13 0% 0 15-Nov-13 14-Dec-13 0% 0,15-Dec-13 29.7Dec-13 0% 0 30-Dec-13 037Jan-14 0% 0:„04-Jan-14„ 17-Jan-14,, 0%0, 0 11-Feb-14_ 24-Feb-.14 0% 0; 25-Feb-14 26-Mar-14 0% Print Date: 03-Apr-1307:23 PDT Mtg for Inital Consideration of Resource Agency Mtg for Evaluation of PDT Mtg for Final Selection of Approval of Preferred Alternative riPHASE II EVALUATION PROPO Native Amer. Consultation - Site Treatment RCTC & District & Prelimina RCTC & District 8 Rev CH Revise District 8 Review . CH Revise . Caltrans Provide Tran -1-1181 Native American . Coordinate Resp CH Revise AEP for Preferred Alt Caltrans Review/Approve Rep Prep Phase 11 Mobilizati Phase II Fieldwor Phase II Lab ER RCTC & C Re . CH Revise AER for Final S . CH Revise/Add Preferred Alternat RCTC & District & Preliminary Rev RCTC & District 8 R v CH kei is . Caltrans RG1 ie . Native American Review (w t} ;LAPS . CH Revise/Resolve C r Caltrans Review/Approve ' port Edi Prepare Fna SUPPLEMENTAL H1AF RCTC & District & Preliminary Rav RCTC & District 8 Rev p CH 2e it is . Caltrans R4 vie Native American ltevie CH Revise/Resolve C{rmmen Caltrans Review/Approve Re Dort Ed Prepare Fna Caltrans Subrr to SHP SHPO Eligibilij Cicncuren;c FINDING OF EFFECT RCTC & District & Preliminar! Revie RCTC & District S Revie GH Revis, Caltrans Review/Approve ICeport Edii Prq Dare Find Caltrans Subrr it t, HQ/SIIP SHP() Concurrenc fA EDP of AI ED Rev w ew mitts Letters evie n>e )o Tribes with Ca tKap: ati` rt n e Fin n Ctommont`rtes - Coti`mon Sites or'k j, Comm oin Si es P-i Ise II Miibil ti )6 ; Fiyase 11 Fildwork Fi Phase I! Lab Wdrl6 4-rict 8 Citurtny Rev hie ConiinenN,, Fdeft . MCFQ/SF L tit Sheet 4 of 5 -nal ite ,1 Sit: in al Site d o Draft Report Rev w 251 Detailed Progress Update Through April 3, 2013 A 10-0010 Al 0-0020 A 10-0025 A 10-0030 A 10-0040 A 10-0050 Ca* • W BS 205.40.05 205.40.05 205.40.05 205.40.10 205.40.15 Prepare Route Adoption Request Review of Route Adoption Request Revise Route Adoption Request Request Route Adoption from CTC Route Adoption Approval Execute Route Adoption FHWA Major Project Requirements A07-0040 A07-0045 A07-0050 A07.70055 7 A070060 ......... A07-0065 180.15.05 180. 15.05 180.15.05 180.15.05 180.15..05 180.15.05 Notice of Determination A10-0060 180.15.10 A10-0070 180.15.10 A10-0080 180.15.10 A 10-0090 180.15.10 A10-0100 180.15.10 Record of Decision A0.7-0010 A07-0020 ............. A0.770025 A07-0030 180,15.05 180.15.05 180.15.05 180,1.5.05 Prepare Cost Estimates for FHWA Review FHWA Reviews Cost Estimates Prepare Draft Project Management Plan (PMP) FHWA Reviews Draft PMP Prepare Final PMP FHWA Reviews Final PMP Prepare Draft Joint NOD Review of Draft Joint NOD Joint NOD Approval File Joint NOD w/ State Clearinghse/County Clerk State Clearinghouse/County Clerk Posts Joint NOE Prepare, Draft,ROD Caltrans Reviews Draft ROD Resolve Comments and Finalize ROD Final ROD. Approyal Permitting and Approval Activities A09-1030 A0971040 _A0972020 A09-2030 ................. _ A09-2050 A09-2060 A09-2070 A09-2080 A09-2090 A09-2100 A09-2110 A09-2120 _ A09 213 Q _ A09-2140„ . A09-2150 A09-2160 A09-2170 Deter 165.15.99 165.15.99 165.15.10 205.10.50 ,.205.10.05 205.10.05 205.10.05 205.10.05 205.10.50 205.10.20 • 205.10.05 205.10,05 205.10,05 205.10.50 205.10.05 205.10.20 �11 . Prepare MSHCP Equivalency Analysis Final Equivalency Analysis Approved USAGE/CDFG Verifies Delineation Submit. Initial Draft 401 Application and Fee 404 Preliminary Public Notice USACE Evaluates Comments on Prelim.PUb.Notict LEDPA Agency Agreement. Submit 404 Application Submit 401 Application Submit SAA Application USACE Prepares 404 Public Notice Final E)R/E(S.Circulate/404_Public, Notice_ Issued USACE Evaluates. Comments on ,Public„ Notice USACE ROD Approval 40.1 Certification from RWQCB USACE Permit Decision SAA From CDFG 4 Urig DU( 40 40 30 0 0 Actual Duratio Riverside County Transportation Commission: State Route 79 Realignment Project Apr 3i, n Update Sta 0 1 1-Mar-14 0 20-Apr-I4 0 30-May-14 0 29-Jun-14 0 90 0 24-Apr-14 30 0 23-Jul-14 90 0 25-Mar-14 30 0 23-Jun-14 30 0.09-Apr-15 30 0 09-May-15 30 0.07-Aug-14 30 0 06-Sep-I4 30 0 06-Oct-14 5 0 05-Nov-14 30 0 10-Nov-14 30 0 07-Aug-I4. 30 0 06-Sep-14 30 0 06-Oct-I4 30 0 09-Jan-15 90 0.08-Jun-13 60 0 06 Sep 13 30 0 03-Apr-13 0 0 03-Apr-13 30 0 03-May-13 16 0'02-Jun-13 30 008-Jun-13 30 0.08-Jul-13 30 0 08-Jul-13 30 0 08-Jul-1.3. 30 0 11-Mar-14 30 0 06-Sep-I4 30 0 06-Oct-14 30 0 08-Feb-I5 60 0 10-Mar- l 5 60 0 09-May-15 60 0 09-May-15 .O1-Jun-13 17 Jun-_13 074u1713 , 06-Aug-13 06-Aug-.I 3 ...... • 06-Aug-13..._ 09-Apr-14 05-Oct-l4 04-Nov-14. 09-Mar-15 . _08-Mav-15 07,-Jul-15 ._1077Ju1715 Apr 3, Update Fi 19-Apr-14 29-May- 14 28-Jun-14 05-Oct-14 09-Dec-14 23-Jul-14�9..... 21-Aug-14 23-Jun-14 22-Jul-14 .... 08-Mav-15. 07-Jun-1.5 ... 06-Sep-14 . 06-Oct-14 04-Nov-14 ...... 09-Nov-I4 09-Dec-14 05-Sep-13. 04 Nov 13 V 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% . 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 02-May-13_ ._. 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 194 Q11Q21Q31444 2009 Qi Q2 Q3 Q4 2 Print Date: 03-Apr-1307:23 10 Q3 1 Q4 441 011 012 Q21Q31Q4 Q,11Q21Q3 Q Prepare Route Ado Review of Route A Revise Route Request Route Ro Prepare Cost Estimates fog FHWA Re Prepare Draft Project Manage rr FHWA R P-ep Re v icj File Joint NOD w/ State 4 State Clearinghouse/Cou i Cattail Resolve C Prepare MSHCP Equivalency Ana Final Equivalency Analysis A USACE/CDFG Verifies Delineatio Submit Initial Draft 401 Application and F 404 Preliminary Public Notic USACE Evaluates Comments on Prelim.Pub.Not LEDPA Agency Agreemen Submit 404 Applicat o Submit 401 Applicat o Submit SAAApplicatio USACE Prepares 404 Public Notic ►14 Final EIR/E1S Circulate/4( 4 Public Not ce Issue USACE Evaluates Comments on Public Noti USACE ROD Approva-g 401 Certification from RWQCB► USACE Permit Decisio SAA From CDFG 4 tion Repue ption ReqLe doptiori Re c ue option rrom �T to Adoption,AApprov Execute Rothe Ado , 2014 Q119 I° HWA Review►t ws Cosi Estlirtates� t Plan (PMP)•I iews Draft PMP` 'repare = FHWA Reviews I Q4 9H re Draft Joi it NOD of Drift Joint NC D Joint NOD Appro earinghse/County Clerk Posts Joint Prepare Draft RO Revievis Daft RO ents and Finalize RO Fihal ROD Al)? op nal P i nal va `le NO1+0 2 1 F-•['1 M Sheet 5 of 5 4 6 Q 1 Original Start and Original Finish are based on the April 5, 2007 PDT schedule. Dates marked by an asterisk (*) show the original date for tasks added after April 5, 2007. © Primavera Systems, Inc. Remaining Work ♦ ♦ Milestone Actual Work Critical Remaining Work 252 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Jillian Guizado, Staff Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2013/14 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Funding Recommendations BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2013/14 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program recommended funding of $1,780,922. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, 2 percent of the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) revenue is made available for use on bicycle and pedestrian facility projects through the Commission's SB 821 Program. This is a discretionary program administered by the Commission. There are three steps to carry out the program: 1. All cities and the county of Riverside are notified of the SB 821 program estimate of available funding and are requested to submit project proposals. The Commission's SB 821 program policies, project application, and selection criteria are also provided with the notification. 2. The Commission's SB 821 evaluation committee, comprised of three members of the Commission's Technical and three members of the Citizens Advisory Committees, meets to review and rank the project applications using the evaluation criteria adopted by the Commission. The applicants are invited to give a presentation of their proposals and to answer questions from the committee members. The evaluation committee recommends projects and funding amounts to the Commission for approval. Agenda Item 9D 253 3. The Commission reviews the Committee's recommendations and approves a program of bicycle and pedestrian projects for funding. Upon receiving a funding allocation, agencies then have 24 months to complete the projects. DISCUSSION: In March 2013, staff notified the cities and the county that an estimated $1,379,385 would be available for programming in FY 2013/14 through the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program, which amount is included in the FY 2013/14 Commission budget. Proposals were due on May 16. The Commission received 32 project proposals, totaling $4,004,012 in SB 821 funding requests, which is attached. Due to CAC member unavailability to participate on the evaluation committee, a diverse evaluation committee comprised of three members from the Commission's Technical Advisory Committee, one Commission staff, one San Bernardino Associated Governments staff, and one Riverside Transit Agency staff reviewed the proposals on May 29. Based upon the Commission's adopted scoring criteria, which is attached, the proposals were evaluated and ranked by members of the evaluation committee. Eighteen projects totaling $1,780,922 are recommended for funding as indicated in the attachment. The difference between the estimated funding available and the amount recommended for funding this year is due to the availability of an additional $401,537 achieved through cost savings on previously claimed projects. These cost savings have enabled the Commission to fund 18 projects instead of 13. Moving forward, additional project cost savings and returned allocations will be used to supplement the funding available for the FY 2014/15 call for projects. Staff concurs with the evaluation committee's recommendation. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2013/14 Amount: $1,780,922 Source of Funds: LTF Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 601 62 86106 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \y'i Date: 06/18/13 Attachments: 1) SB 821 FY 2013/14 Recommended Funding 2) SB 821 Evaluation Criteria • Agenda Item 9D 254 Rank Agency 1 Menifee 2 Perris 3 Moreno Valley 4 Riverside 5 San Jacinto 6 Riverside 7 Moreno Valley 8 Wildomar 9 Eastvale 10 Hemet 11 Riverside County 12 San Jacinto 13 Riverside County 14 Coachella 15 Riverside 16 Menifee 17 Jurupa Valley 18 Indio • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FY 2013/14 RECOMMENDED FUNDING Project Description McCall Boulevard Sidewalk Improvements Ruby Drive Sidewalk and Pedestrian Bridge Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Market Street Bike Facilities Chase Street/Ramona Expressway Sidewalk Rutland and Gramercy Avenue Sidewalks Access Ramp Pedestrian Enhancements 5 5 5 5 George Avenue Sidewalk lnfill Improvements $ Scholar Way Sidewalk Accessibility Improvements $ Gilbert Street ADA Ramps $ Van Buren Street $ Cawston Avenue Sidewalk Improvements $ Columbia Street $ Rancho Las Flores Park Sidewalk Improvement $ Wheelchair Ramps Construction $ Garbani Road Sidewalk Improvements $ Golden West Avenue Sidewalk Infill Project $ Highway 111 Pedestrian Accessibility Project $ ATTACHMENT 1 Total SB 821 Funds Recommended Cummulative Average Costs Requested Allocation Funds Allocated Score 130,300 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 79.17 108,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 115,000 78.83 608,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 240,000 78.83 62,517 $ 31,259 $ 31,259 $ 271,259 77.83 60,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 301,259 77.67 380,042 $ 190,021 $ 190,021 $ 491,280 76.67 312,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 616,280 74.33 139,429 $ 69,714 $ 69,714 $ 685,994 74.33 289,706 $ 144,853 $ 144,853 $ 830,847 73.83 133,000 $ 66,500 $ 66,500 $ 897,347 73.83 550,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 1,172,347 73.50 340,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 1,217,347 73.33 351,000 $ 175,500 $ 175,500 $ 1,392,847 72.33 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 1,467,847 71.17 267,600 $ 133,800 $ 133,800 $ 1,601,647 71.17 68,750 $ 34,375 $ 34,375 $ 1,636,022 71.00 140,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 1,706,022 70.17 164,100 $ 74,900 $ 74,900 $ 1,780,922 69.83 19 Indio 20 Temecula 21 Desert Hot Springs 22 Palm Springs 23 Lake Elsinore 24 Jurupa Valley 25 Palm Springs 26 Lake Elsinore 27 Beaumont 28 Banning 29 Lake Elsinore 30 Lake Elsinore 31 Lake Elsinore 32 Lake Elsinore Jefferson Street Sidewalk Pauba Road Sidewalk Improvements Cabot Yerxa Elementary Ped. Improvements Indian Canyon Drive Bicycle Lanes Mission Trail from Hidden Trail to Olive Pyrite Street Sidewalk Infill Project Missing Link Sidewalks Sumner Ave between Lewis and Scrivener Brookside Avenue Sidewalk Sunrise Avenue Mill Street between Ave.4 and Ave. 6 Sumner Ave at Scrivener Corydon Road from Cereal to Palomar Lewis Street between Sumner and Heald $ 262,525 $ 416,700 $ 3,229,000 $ 30,550 $ 971,586 $ 59,000 $ 132,150 $ 77,708 $ 119,650 $ 150,000 $ 194,481 $ 114,335 $ 618,592 $ 69,230 Totals $ 10 699 951 $ 98,500 $ 332,250 $ 195,000 $ 21,380 $ 667,835 $ 46,200 $ 92,500 $ 33,404 $ 59,825 $ 105,000 $ 86,095 $ 44,943 $ 409,794 $ 30,365 4.04• 5 5 5 5 5 5 $ 69.67 $ 69.17 $ 66.83 $ 66.00 $ 64.33 $ 64.17 $ 62.67 $ 61.00 $ 60.33 $ 58.83 $ 58.00 $ 58.00 $ 57.50 $ 53.83 � L7$4.9Z2 255 ATTACHMENT 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 EVALUATION CRITERIA FACTOR 1. USE The extent of potential use of a bicycle or pedestrian facility is the most important factor. Emphasis of this factor helps ensure the greatest benefits will be derived from the expenditure of SB 821 funds. Relative usage is to be derived from analysis of trip generators and attractors adjacent to the project. 2. SAFETY Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to correct current safety problems. 3. IMPORTANCE AS A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to attract users who would otherwise use an automobile. 4. MISSING LINK, EXTENSION, OR CONNECTIVITY Points are awarded to projects that link, are extensions of, or potentially connect to existing facilities. 5. MATCHING FUNDS This factor is used to help ensure that there is local funding participation in the project - not just an application for "free" money. One point would be awarded for each 5% of total project cost that is financed by the local agency. 6. POPULATION EQUITY The purpose of this factor is to help ensure that one agency does not receive all the funds. The applicant receives the maximum 10 points if the amount of funds requested does not exceed what the applicant would receive if the funds were allocated by population. Year to year totals are recorded so that an applicant could build up a "credit". (Calculated by RCTC) 7. PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY ENHANCEMENT The purpose of this factor is to enhance the physical accessibility of existing pedestrian projects. Applicant agencies may receive up to 10 "bonus" points for their project proposals which improve the physical access to existing facilities. MAXIMUM POINTS 25 20 20 15 10 10 10 BONUS RCTC_ 04/12/1995 256 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NSPOR TA T/ON COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Jillian Guizado, Staff Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2013/14 Measure A Commuter Assistance Buspool Subsidy Funding Continuation Requests WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize payment of $1,645/month maximum subsidy per buspool for the period July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, to the existing Mira Loma, Riverside, and Riverside II buspools; and 2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As part of the Measure A Commuter Assistance Program, the Commission provides funding support to buspools used by Riverside County residents for their commutes along the State Route 91 corridor. The Commission adopted the Measure A buspool subsidy in October 1990 and established a monthly subsidy rate of $1,175 or $25/seat/month in support of commuter buspool operations. In July 2004, the Commission set the subsidy rate at $35/seat/month ($1,645/month) to help offset increases to operational costs during the previous 14 years. To provide additional guidance, the Commission also established a minimum buspool ridership policy in June 1995. The policy requires staff to report to the Commission when a buspool's ridership falls to 25 or below and to seek direction regarding the continuation of the buspool's subsidy. Like all commuter assistance incentives provided by the Commission to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation, the Measure A $35/seat/month subsidy is administered as a user end subsidy. The Commission's subsidy is an important factor that makes buspools an attractive alternative for these commuters with roundtrip commutes in excess of 100 miles. Also, the Commission's subsidy Agenda Item 9E 257 remains cost-effective compared to the typical public transit subsidy rate of 83 percent. While the monthly cost of each buspool varies according to the number of route miles and the resulting negotiated service price, the Commission's monthly subsidy reflects a subsidy rate of 13 percent. Average Monthly Buspool Fare Per Rider $260.00 RCTC Subsidy Per Seat $35.00 Subsidy Rate 13% Unlike some of the other Commission -approved ridesharing incentives that have a limited term, the buspool subsidy is ongoing. To renew its annual subsidy, an existing buspool is required to: • Request in writing, continuation of funding from the Commission for the new fiscal year; • Consistently meet minimum ridership requirements; and • Submit monthly ridership reports throughout the year. As anticipated, in September 2012, the Riverside II buspool came online and has been quite successful, going from 27 riders in September to 41 riders this June. Unfortunately, in December 2012, the Corona buspool disbanded due to declining ridership. The three remaining buspools have completed all the requirements for funding as set forth by the Commission including the submittal of monthly ridership reports and annual funding continuation requests. They have consistently exceeded the minimum ridership level of 25 riders per month and have collectively averaged 33 riders/month/buspool. The traffic and environmental benefits realized in -FY 2012/13 by offering this subsidy are illustrated below: Corona 30 ,pn,dtrip .tance< — 110 mi Anriiaal 424,270 7,700 Mira Loma 32 -- 120 mi 974,160 16,236 Riverside 37 - 144 mi 1,365,408 18,964 Riverside II 32 --- 200 mi 1,346,400 13,464 Estimated Pounds of Emissions Reduced 38,743 Miles Saved Trips Reduced 4,110,238 56,364 In reducing the number of vehicles on SR-91 during peak periods, the buspool program saved more than 4 million miles and 38,700 pounds of vehicle emissions in FY 2012/13. The buspool subsidy proves to be an effective use of Measure A Commuter Assistance Program funds and a budget of $80,000 is proposed for FY 2013/14. • • Agenda Item 9E 258 • • Based on the established monthly $1,645/month per buspool subsidy policy, the funds will support the continuation of the three existing buspools and the possibility for one new start-up buspool. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2013/14 Amount: $80,000 Source of Funds: Measure A Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 002109 81030 263 41 81002 Fiscal Procedures Approved: )//fi.4.,_.a„v,i-t Date: 06/18/13 Attachments: 1) Mira Loma Renewal Request 2) Riverside Renewal Request 3) Riverside II Renewal Request Agenda Item 9E 259 ATTACHMENT 1 • HARLAN ALPERT Send correspondences to: Harlan Alpert 5522 Sulphur Dr Mira Loma, CA 91752 May 08, 2013 Attn.: Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Mr. Cunanan, In compliance with the requirements of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I am requesting an extension of funding for the period of July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 for the "Mira Loma" (Mira Loma/Corona) to El Segundo Commuter Buspool. I am the buspool operator and coordinate this buspool independently from any employer. The monthly cost to operate this buspool from (Tour Coach) is $254. RCTC provides a $35 monthly subsidy per seat and the remaining $219 is provided between the riders and their employers. The following is the Mira Loma/Corona Buspool schedule: AM Departure AM Departure AM Arrival PM Departure PM Arrival PM Arrival Mira Loma Corona Park & Ride Lot El Segundo El Segundo Corona Park & Ride Lot Mira Loma (Monday — Thursday) (Friday) 4:10 a.m. 4:10 a.m. 4:25 a.m. 4:25 a.m. 5:30 a.m. 5:30 a.m. 3:00 p.m. 4:30 p.m. 4:45 p.m. 2:30 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:15 p.m. Information on this buspool is available with rideshare programs at Raytheon, Boeing, Aerospace Corporation, and the Los Angeles Air Force base. Employees receive this information through direct mailings, newsletter articles, and electronic messaging from these employers. These employer rideshare programs also share this information with other local employee transportation coordinators. Thank you for your continued support of this successful buspool program. Sincerely Harlan Alpert Mira Loma Buspool Operator 260 ATTACHMENT 2 CATALINA FUENTES Send correspondences to: Raytheon Company 2000 E. El Se<,undo Blvd. El Sci2undo. CA 9024-5-4501 May 15, 2013 Attn.: Brian Cunanan, Commuter Assistance Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Mr. Cunanan, In compliance with the requirements of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I am requesting an extension of funding for the period of July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 for the "Riverside" to El Segundo Commuter Buspool. I am the buspool operator and coordinate this buspool independently from any employer. The monthly cost to operate this buspool from (Tour Coach) is $267.00. RCTC provides a $35 monthly subsidy per seat and the remaining $232.00 is provided between the riders and their employers. The following is the Riverside to El Segundo Buspool schedule: AM Departure AM Departure AM Arrival PM Departure PM Arrival PM Arrival Galleria at Tyler, Riverside Corona Park & Ride Lot Raytheon, El Segundo Raytheon, El Segundo Corona Park & Ride Lot Galleria at Tyler, Riverside 4:15 a.m. • 4:25 a.m. 5:20 a.m. 3:00 p.m. 4:30 p.m. 4:45 p.m. Information on this buspool is available with rideshare programs at R.aytheon, Aerospace Corporation, and the Los Angeles Air Force base. Employees receive this information through direct mailings, newsletter articles, and electronic messaging from these employers. These employer rideshare programs also share this information with other local employee - transportation coordinators. Thank you for your continued support of this successful buspool program. Sincerely, Catalina Fuentes Riverside Buspool Coordinator 261. ATTACHMENT 3 • • • TRACY HUTCHINSON Send correspondences to Raytheon Company 2200 E. Imperial Hwy i Segundo, CA 90245 May 15. 2013 Attn. Brian Cyan, Commuter Assistance Manama Riverside County Transportation +Commission Box 12008 Riverside, CA 9252208 Dear Mt Curium. In compliance with the requirements of the Riverside Counter Transportinkm Commission (RCTC), I am requesting ceding for time perm of July I.2013 to June 30. 2014 for the 'Riverside r to El. Stgundo Commuter Vapor)). I am the buspool operator and coonilioate this buspvol 'irk dy from any employer. The monthly cost to operate this buspool fin (Tou o ) is $2 _t . RC I`C'ides a $35.00 monthly subsidy per seat and the remaining $225.00 is provided between the ridgy and their employers. The fallowing is the Riverside 2 to Segundo Buspool schedule; AM Deputize Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station. AM Deputize Nora Main Corona Metr°link Station Alf Arrival Rayon, El Segtundo 4:45 a.m. 5:05 a.m. ft:I tl am. PM Demur Ramon. El undo 4:00 p.m, PM Arrival North Main Coma Metrolink Statue 5:I0 p.m. PM Arrival RiverMe-Downtown IvIetrolink Station 5.35 p.m. Infoonation on this buspool is available with rideshare programs at Raytheon. Boeing. Aerospace Corporation, and the Los Angeles ,±fir Fore base. Employees receive this information through direct mailingaF newsletter articles. said electronic messaging from these employers. These employers tideshare proms also share this information with other local employee transportation coordinators, Thank you for your continued support of this ful uspool Sincerely. eta Tracy Hurg eireion Riverside 2 Rvspool Cooniin or 262 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Tanya Love, Goods Movement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Auto Center Drive Street Signal Project Tied to Grade Separation WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 13-24-148-00 with the city of Corona (Corona) for the installation of a traffic signal at the northerly driveway of the West Corona Station and Auto Center Drive; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and • 3) Allocate $235,865 in 2009 Measure A Western County Rail funds to Corona in support of the traffic signal. • BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Recently, the California Transportation Commission allocated Proposition 1 B bond money to Corona to fund the Auto Center Drive grade separation project. A requirement of the Proposition 1 B funding is that all projects must start construction by December 2013. The Auto Center Drive project will construct a grade separation over Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway at an estimated cost of $32 million. Construction is scheduled to begin in August 2013 with project completion in June 2015. Although the project has been in the design phase for quite some time, city and Commission staff recently agreed on the need to install a traffic signal, instead of a stop sign, at the northerly driveway of the West Corona Station and Auto Center Drive. The recommendation to install a traffic signal is due to safety concerns augmented by the need to route buses effectively and efficiently. The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) has 22 buses that serve this station daily; when exiting the station, the drivers currently make a left-hand turn. The traffic study conducted for the Auto Center Drive project recommends RTA buses make a right-hand turn once the project is completed. This change will result in extra miles and time added to the Agenda Item 9F 263 route requiring RTA to add an additional bus in order to retain the current passenger schedule. The cost of purchasing and operating an additional bus far exceeds the cost of the proposed traffic signal. Although a stop sign is sufficient according to the traffic study, in the long run, it is less expensive and more efficient for transit service, to install a traffic signal compared to year -over -year costs to operate an additional bus. It should be noted there are no safety concerns until after the grade separation project is completed. Due to timing issues tied to the Proposition 1 B funding, staff was unable to incorporate the installation of the traffic signal with the grade separation project. As a result, if approved, the traffic signal will be installed by the city after the grade separation project is completed, which is currently projected for 2015. As part of the grade separation project, all the signal underground work (conduit, foundations, etc.) will be completed in anticipation of the future installation of the traffic signal. Staff is requesting that $235,865 in 2009 Measure A Western County Rail funds be allocated for the future signal. If approved, the Commission and the city will enter into a cooperative agreement. The Commission will pay for the cost of the signal and provide the city a public utility and temporary construction easement at no cost. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2013/14 Amount: $235,865 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Rail Funds Budget Adjustment: Yes 244004 81301 103-24-81301- $235,865 GL/Project Accounting No.: 244004 81301 103-24-59001- ($235,865) 332404 81301 265-33-97001- $235,865 Fiscal Procedures Approved: uPLe44.34,ev, tio- Date: 06/19/13 Attachment: Cooperative Agreement No. 13-24-14.8-00 • Agenda Item 9F 264 • • • Agreement No. 13-24-148-00 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF CORONA FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT NORTHERLY DRIVEWAY OF WEST CORONA METROLINK STATION AND AUTO CENTER DRIVE This Cooperative Agreement ("Cooperative Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2013 by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") and the City of Corona (the "City"). RCTC and the City are sometimes referred to herein individually as "Party", and collectively as the "Parties". RECITALS WHEREAS, the Auto Center Drive Grade Separation project will grade separate the current at -grade crossing of Auto Center Drive with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company for the purpose of enhancing movement and rail line reliability, allowing for future rail line expansion and improving vehicle circulation and public safety. WHEREAS, RCTC has requested that a traffic signal be installed at the northerly driveway of the West Corona Metrolink station and Auto Center Drive ("Project"). WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Parties to enter into this Cooperative Agreement to establish and coordinate the responsibilities of the Parties with respect to the Project, all as further set forth herein. WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of this Cooperative Agreement, the City shall engage the services of a contractor ("Contractor") to complete the Project. WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that the City's full compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and all other applicable laws are a precondition to any construction of the Project. WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge and agree that nothing in this Cooperative Agreement commits RCTC to approving or constructing the Project. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is mutually understood and agreed by RCTC and the City as follows: 1 17336.00603\7833419.6 265 TERMS 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Cooperative Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 2. Term. This Cooperative Agreement shall be effective as of the date first set forth above, and shall continue in effect until the Project is complete, as evidenced by the City's recording of a notice of completion for the Project. 3. General Agreement to Cooperate. The Parties agree to mutually cooperate in order to help ensure that the Project is successfully completed with minimum impact to both Parties, and the public. 4. Obligations of RCTC. 4.1 RCTC shall reimburse the City for Project construction costs in an amount not to exceed Two Hundred Thirty Five Thousand, Eight Hundred Sixty Five Dollars ($235,865) Cost overruns exceeding the foregoing not to exceed amount shall be the exclusive responsibility of the City, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Parties. No funds expended by RCTC under this Agreement shall be from state or federal sources. 4.2 RCTC shall make periodic payments no more frequently than monthly. Payments of undisputed amounts shall be made within thirty (30) days following RCTC's approval of an invoice from the City. 4.3 RCTC shall grant, at no cost to the City, a public utility easement in a form agreed upon by the Parties over that portion of RCTC's property upon which RCTC has agreed that the signal, or portion thereof, may be installed, as shall be shown in the design documents approved by RCTC. RCTC shall also grant, at no cost to the City, a temporary construction easement or license, in a form agreed upon by the Parties, over RCTC property, as may be necessary, for City's construction of the Project. 5. Obligations of the City 5.1 The City shall be responsible for procuring all design and construction management services necessary, or provide staff resources necessary, to complete the Project. The City shall be responsible for the process of selecting and contracting with'a design firm and construction management firm, if necessary, and with a Contractor to complete the Project in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws including, without limitation, the California Public Contract Code and the California Labor Code, and shall additionally be responsible for obtaining all applicable environmental clearances and permits necessary to complete the Project. 5.2 The City shall regularly invoice RCTC, not more frequently than once per month, for construction costs not to exceed the amount specified in Section 4.1 above. Invoices shall be in a form approved by RCTC. 2 • • 17336.00603\7833419.6 266 • • 5.3 The City shall be responsible for all design and construction contract management costs related to the Project, and for purchasing the signal and related equipment to be installed by the Contractor including, but not limited to, conduit and signal foundations. 5.4 The City shall provide RCTC an opportunity to review and approve all design documents generated for the Project, which the City anticipates will be relied upon by the Contractor to construct the Project, to ensure that the Project meets the goal of providing expedient bus service to the West Corona Metrolink station. 5.5 The City shall obtain or shall require the Contractor to obtain all required permits and approvals for all Project work. 5.6 The City shall complete the design and construction of the Project in a timely manner so as to avoid adverse effects to the public. It is the intent of the City to begin construction immediately upon completion of the Auto Center Drive Grade Separation Project. 5.7 The City shall include, in its contract with the Contractor, a requirement that the Contractor include RCTC, its members, officers, employees and agents as an additional insured and as an indemnified party under said contract. Insurance shall be in the same amounts and with the same provisions as provided for the benefit of the City. 5.8 As between RCTC and the City, the City and its consultants shall be responsible for performing design reviews and construction inspection of the Project work to ensure conformance with City standards and the construction contract including, but not limited to, the technical provisions of said contract. The City shall allow RCTC staff access to the Project site, at all times, to perform observation of any Project improvements. Such observation; if completed, shall be for RCTC's benefit only and shall not relieve the City of any responsibility hereunder. 5.9 The City, as the owner of the signal to be installed pursuant to this Cooperative Agreement, shall be solely responsible for all future maintenance thereof. 6. Time is of the Essence. Each Party warrants that it shall make its best efforts to perform all obligations assigned to it related to the Project in such a manner as to allow the Project to progress as scheduled. 7. Dispute Resolution. Unless otherwise specified herein, the Parties shall submit any unresolved dispute to RCTC's Executive Director and the City Manager for negotiation. The Executive Director and the City Manager agree to undertake good faith attempts to resolve said dispute, claim, or controversy within ten (10) calendar days after the receipt of written notice from the Party alleging that a dispute, claim or controversy exists. The Parties additionally agree to cooperate with the other Party in scheduling negotiation sessions. However, if said matter is not resolved within thirty (30) calendar days after conducting the first negotiating session, either Party may, but is not required to, request that the matter be submitted to further dispute resolution procedures, as may be agreed upon by the Parties. 17336.00603\7833419.6 267 8. Legal Action. If a matter is not resolved within thirty (30) calendar days after the first negotiating session between the Executive Director and the City Manager, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Parties, either Party may proceed with any other remedy available in law or in equity. 9. Indemnification. 9.1 RCTC shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of RCTC, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of RCTC's obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys fees. 9.2 The City shall indemnify, defend and hold RCTC, its directors, officials, officers, employees; agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims,. demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of the City; its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of the City's obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys. fees. 9.3 The indemnification provisions set forth in this Section 9 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement. 10. Force majeure. The failure of performance by either Party (except for payment obligations) hereunder shall not be deemed to be a default where delays or defaults are due to war; insurrection; strikes; lock -outs; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; governmental restrictions; unusually severe weather; inability to secure necessary labor, materials or tools; delays of any contractor, subcontractor, railroad, or suppliers; acts of the other Party; acts or failure to act of any other public or governmental agency or entity (other than that acts or failure to act of the Parties); or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform or relief from default. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Cooperative Agreement may also be extended in writing by mutual agreement between the Parties. 11. Amendments. This Cooperative Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the Parties by an instrument in writing. 4 268 17336.00603\7833419.6 • • • 12. Assignrnent of Cooperative Agreement. Neither Party may assign or transfer its respective rights or obligations under this Cooperative Agreement without the express written consent of the other Party. Any purported assignment or transfer by one Party without the express written consent of the other Party shall be null and void and of no force or effect. 13. Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non -defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. No consent or approval of either Party shall be deemed to waive or render unnecessary such Party's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of the other Party. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Cooperative Agreement. 14. Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Cooperative Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Cooperative Agreement, which shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 15. Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 16. Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third -party beneficiaries to this Cooperative Agreement. 17. Entire Agreement. This Cooperative Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the 'subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understandings. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 5 17336.00603\7833419.6 269 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF CORONA FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT NORTHERLY DRIVEWAY OF WEST CORONA METROLINK STATION AND AUTO CENTER DRIVE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CITY OF CORONA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Its: Its: ATTEST: By: City Clerk Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: By: By: Best Best & Krieger General Counsel 6 Dean Derleth City Attorney 17336.00603\7833419.6 270 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2013 TO: Riverside County Transportation'Commission FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Benefits/Obligations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 1999, the county of Riverside launched the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP). The RCIP was a stakeholder driven process that united property owners, builders, farmers, and government behind a long-range planning effort that incorporated three distinctive elements - conservation, transportation, and land use. What made the RCIP environmental streamlining approach unique is the premise that the environment must be addressed the same as any other piece of critical infrastructure. The project avoided the normal approach to development to plan the project first, and then attempt to mitigate. The RCIP began with the development of the MSHCP, which encompassed approximately 1.26 million acres (1,966 square miles), and provided coverage for 146 threatened or endangered species under a 75-year permit from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (the wildlife agencies). The county of Riverside approved the MSHCP in June 2003, and the Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit and the California Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) Act permit was granted in June 2004. As part of the MSHCP, approximately 153,000 acres of additional reserve lands will be secured within 25 years of plan approval to add to the approximately 347,000 acres already in public/quasi-public lands. Over the remaining 50 years of the state and federal permits, local mitigation will contribute to the long-term management and monitoring of the MSHCP conservation area. In acknowledgement of the importance of environmental protection and in support of the MSHCP and the RCIP, the Commission's 2002 sales tax expenditure plan, Measure A, identified $153 million specifically for environmental mitigation. Agenda Item 10 271 Caltrans and Commission Benefits and Obligations This effort to set aside habitat and protect species allows the transportation infrastructure and development necessary for a healthy economy to move ahead without sacrificing the region's environment and quality of life. Prior to the MSHCP, significant time was spent trying to secure the required permits from the wildlife agencies to allow transportation improvements to occur. Unfortunately there were many examples in this county where projects were held up for years trying to secure permits. The mitigation agreed to for each roadway improvement was done in a piecemeal, non -cohesive fashion that often did not support the protection of key wildlife corridors. With the MSHCP, the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and permittees work collaboratively with the wildlife agencies to conserve and protect critical habitat in the county while streamlining the project review process. Caltrans and the Commission are permittees under the MSHCP and are granted take authorization for project impact mitigation for proposed improvements to existing routes such as Interstates 10, 15, and 215, and State Routes 60, 71 74, 79, and 91, as well as coverage of anticipated new transportation projects in the covered area of Western Riverside County for the next 75 years. Caltrans' obligation under the plan required contributing to the assembly of additional reserve lands through acquisition of 3,000 acres within the first eight years of the permits (by June 2012) and creation of a $9.6 million endowment in cooperation with the Department of Fish and Game for the management and monitoring of additional reserve lands, in perpetuity. The Commission's obligations under the MSHCP and the implementing agreement include the contribution of $153 million for mitigation of its covered activities. The $9.6 million endowment and the 3,000 acres have been secured, so Caltrans' obligation has been fulfilled. To date, the Commission contributed $131,649,708 to the RCA toward the purchase of 9,283 acres of land, which has been placed into conservation. The Commission took action in. December 2011 to provide $3 million per year through FY 2019/20 to fulfill its remaining obligation under the MSHCP. Impact to RCTC Projects if Permit is Pulled or Permit -tees Withdraw Concern was raised about the effect on the Commission's projects if the Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) and NCCP permits were pulled or if a permittee withdrew from the MSHCP. Staff conferred with legal counsel and RCA staff to discuss this issue. Attached is a memorandum from RCA related to this topic that outlines four scenarios on how the Commission's projects could be affected if the permits are revoked or modified. • • Agenda Item 10 272 Generally, the memo notes that if the Commission fulfilled its $153 million mitigation requirement, the Commission will continue to have coverage as long as the Commission complies with the Plan's requirements. The Commission/Caltrans coverage will continue for projects that are completed or under construction. However, new Commission/Caltrans projects would no longer be automatically covered by the MSHCP. Coverage for new projects could continue, but potentially not within the footprint of the city that withdrew. Or, if all the other permittees withdrew, a mitigation bank would need to be developed using the properties that were purchased with Measure A to determine if the Commission/Caltrans new project impacts to species could be covered by banked lands. It is anticipated that it could take 10-24 months to develop a mitigation bank. If the Commission has not completed its mitigation requirement or do not comply with the Plan, the wildlife agencies are likely to require a mitigation bank be developed using all or a portion of the land acquired using Measure A funds. Projects under construction could be delayed until a mitigation bank is developed and new projects would not be automatically covered by the MSHCP. Attachment: RCA Letter Dated June 13, 2013 Agenda Item 10 273 egional onservation ,Authority Western Riverside County MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 2013 TO: Anne Mayer, Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission RIVERSIDE COQNT`r �1 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FROM: Chl s andry, Executive Director Western iverside County Regional Conservation Authority RE: IMPACT TO RCTC PROJECTS IF THE MSHCP IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT OR PERMITTEE(S) WITHDRAW FROM THE PLAN CEFq1E-B) JUN 13 2013 j • • BACKGROUND: RCTC has asked RCA if their transportation projects are covered by the MSHCP (or Plan) in the event that one or more Permittees elect to withdraw from the Plan. The MSHCP has significantly expedited RCTC's projects by providing endangered species analysis and "take" coverage as part of the environmental process. One of the major reasons that the MSHCP was implemented was the detrimental effect Endangered Species Act requirements were having on transportation projects. With the Plan now in its ninth year, this memorandum discusses the effect on RCTC projects if the MSHCP is partially or wholly affected by withdrawal of Permittees using a number of scenarios. This discussion is clouded with some uncertainty since the MSHCP and transportation coverage are so interconnected. It is clear that if a Permittee withdraws from the Plan, there will be major impacts to RCTC and Caltrans projects. Impacts to other Permittee transportation projects will be even more significant since there will be no further MSHCP coverage. DISCUSSION: In the event of withdrawal from the Plan by one or more Permittees, the USFWS and CDFW (the Wildlife Agencies) can be expected to react vigorously. Under the Implementing Agreement, the Wildlife Agencies may pull portions of, or the entire take permit, therefore withdrawing MSHCP coverage. From previous discussions with the Wildlife Agencies on the withdrawal of a single city, "take" coverage would be completely pulled from any city Permittee which withdrew from the Plan. Further, the Wildlife Agencies can be expected to pull "taken coverage for selected major species throughout the Plan area for species that have significant habitat in that city. Likely candidates would include California gnatcatcher and Riverside fairy shrimp, if they occurred in the withdrawing city's jurisdiction. Projects undertaken by or in a city which withdrew from the Plan would no longer have take coverage under the MSHCP. The City would also lose its Measure A funding since it no longer would be participating in the MSHCP. 3403 1oni Street, Suite 32o, Riverside, California, 92501 • P.O. Box 1667, Riverside, California 92502-1667 Phone: (951) 955-970o • Fax: (95214 �5-8873 • www.wro-rea.org Anne Mayer Page 2 June 13, 2013 • There is specific language in the Implementing Agreement that has some protections for RCTC and Caltrans in the event of revocation or suspension of the permits. These depend on whether RCTC has completed its mitigation requirements under the Plan. In general, if RCTC has completed its $153 million mitigation requirement under the Plan, RCTC continues to have coverage as long as RCTC continues to comply with the Plan's requirements. If RCTC has not completed its $153 million mitigation and/or does not comply with the Plan, the Wildlife Agencies are likely to require a mitigation bank be developed using all or a portion of the land acquired using Measure A. They would deduct the acreage from the bank based upon impacts to projects which have already gone through MSHCP consistency analysis. Forming a mitigation bank will be a time consuming process. For new projects, that have not yet gone through the MSHCP consistency analysis process, the Wildlife Agencies would determine if there was sufficient land containing the affected listed species in the bank. If the banked land was used up for a particular species, then new impacts to that species by the new project would not be covered under the MSHCP. For the purposes of this analysis there are four basic scenarios that could impact RCTC in reference to the MSHCP. These scenarios are: 1. What is the impact if all of the Permittees decide to withdraw from the Plan and RCTC has not completed its $153 million obligation to • the Plan; 2. What is the impact if all of the Permittees decide to withdraw frorn the Plan and RCTC has completed its $153 million obligation to the Plan; 3. What is the impact if a city Permittee withdraws from the MSHCP, and RCTC has not completed :its $153 million obligation to the Plan; 4. What is the impact if a city Permittee withdraws from the MSHCP and RCTC has completed its $153 million obligation to the Plan? IMPACTS: The impacts under each scenario would vary somewhat depending on the Wildlife Agencies interpretation of how the Implementing Agreement provisions should apply. Those impacts are explained below: Scenario 1: What is the impact if all of the Permittees withdraw from the Plan and RCTC has not completed its $153 million obligation to the Plan? The County and "cities will lose take coverage under the Plan, including coverage for transportation, infrastructure and development. RCTC/Caltrans coverage will end for projects under construction until a mitigation bank is developed. A mitigation bank will need to be developed using the properties that were purchased with Measure A to determine if the RCTC impacts to species can be covered by banked lands. The bank may take 10-24 months to develop. Coverage will only be provided only if there is sufficient species occurrence in the bank after completed projects. • 275 • • • Anne Mayer Page 3 June 13, 2013 New RCTC/Caltrans projects will no longer be covered by the MSHCP. The mitigation bank can provide some coverage if there is sufficient .species occurrence in the bank after completed projects. Operation and maintenance projects on Caltrans facilities would only be covered if there was sufficient species occurrence remaining on banked lands. These projects would likely no longer be exempt from listed species survey requirements. Scenario 2. What is the impact if all of the Permittees decide to withdraw from the Plan and RCTC has completed its $153 million obligation to the Plan? The County and cities will lose take coverage under the Plan, including coverage for transportation, infrastructure and development. RCTC/Caltrans coverage will continue for projects which are completed or under construction, as long as the MSHCP was/is complied with. This would include mitigation obligations. New RCTC/Caltrans projects will no longer be automatically covered by the MSHCP. A mitigation bank would need to be developed using the properties that were purchased with Measure A to determine if the RCTC impacts to species can be covered by banked lands. The bank may take 10 - 24 months to develop. Operation and maintenance projects on Caltrans facilities would only be covered if there was sufficient species occupied land remaining in the bank. These projects would likely no longer be exempt from listed species survey requirements Scenario 3. What is the impact if a city Permittee withdraws from the MSHCP, and RCTC has not completed its $153 million obligation to the Plan? The city would lose take coverage under the Plan, including coverage for transportation, infrastructure and development. The withdrawing Permittee will also lose Measure A funding since it will no longer be in compliance with the Plan. RCTC/Caltrans coverage will continue for projects which are completed or under construction, as long as the MSHCP was/is complied with. These requirements include mitigation obligations. New RCTC/Caltrans projects will no longer be automatically covered by the MSHCP. A mitigation bank would need to be developed using the properties that were purchased using Measure A to determine if the RCTC impacts to species could be covered by banked lands. The bank may take 10- 24 months to develop. 276 Anne Mayer Page 4 June 13, 2013 Operation and maintenance projects on Caltrans facilities would only be covered if there was sufficient species occupied land remaining in the bank. These projects would likely no longer be exempt from listed species survey requirements. Scenario 4. What is the impact if a city Permittee withdraws from the MSHCP, and RCTC has completed its $153 million obligation to the Plan? The city will lose take coverage under the Plan, including coverage for transportation, infrastructure and development. The withdrawing permittee will also lose Measure A funding since it will no longer be in compliance with the plan. RCTC/Caltrans coverage will continue for projects which were completed or under construction, as long as the MSHCP is complied with. These requirements would include mitigation obligations. New ,RCTC/Caltrans projects would be covered as long as the MSHCP is complied with, but potentially not within the footprint of the city that withdrew. Operation and maintenance projects on Caltrans facilities will continue to be covered as long as the MSHCP is complied with. RECOMMENDATION: RCA strongly recommends that the MSHCP continue with all Permittees continuing to comply with the Plan. This provides certainty for RCTC and Caltrans for current and future contracts. The SR-91 CIP and the 1-215 Scott to Nuevo projects are definitive examples of the success of the MSHCP. Without this certainty, projects will again be subject to a very slow, arbitrary and capricious approach on Endangered Species Act compliance. • • 277 • • c.) • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 10, 2013 . TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Commissioners Daryl Busch, Greg Pettis, Ron Roberts, and Karen Spiegel SUBJECT: American Public Transportation Association Rail Conference 2013 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The passage of Assembly Bill 1234 requires a report on trips that are made by an elected official on behalf of a public agency. The purpose of this report is to provide information on the recently -completed American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Rail Conference in Philadelphia PA, June 2-5, 2013. On an annual basis, the APTA Rail Conference is held to address nearly every aspect of commuter rail and rail transit. With the ongoing activity in high-speed rail, positive train control (PTC), federal funding and other issues impacting the industry, this year had record attendance with over 1,500 participants. In addition, there was significant Southern California presence including board members and staff from the other partner Metrolink agencies. Metrolink CEO Michael DePallo also was present and continued his role as Chairman of the Security Affairs Steering Committee/Mass Transit Security Coordinating Council. This conference provided a great opportunity to learn more about the industry's latest trends and challenges to developing effective transportation alternatives. Also while in Philadelphia the group had the opportunity to experience the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) rail service with their new Rotem equipment. Attendees: Commissioners Daryl Busch, Greg Pettis, Ron Roberts, and Karen Spiegel participated in the APTA Rail Conference. Workshops and Seminars: There was a full assortment of workshops that directly related to Metrolink Commuter Rail operations, safety, PTC, high-speed rail, intercity -rail, transit oriented development, and topics that relate to the development of the Perris Valley Line. The following list provides some examples: • Noise & Vibration Mitigation through Track Design & Rail Maintenance • Getting Your Rail Safety Program on the MAP! • PTC: Commuter Rail's Implementation Experience Agenda Item 12 278 • International Developments in High Speed Rail • Vehicle Technology in Recent Procurements (Featured Metrolink Tier 4 Locomotives) • Accessible Rail Services: A Benefit to Everyone • Fare Evasion: What's the Real Story? • Managing the Environmental Process in High Capacity Corridors • Planning for the Optimal High Speed Rail City Pairs in the U.S. • Hiring our Heroes Veterans Job Fair/Information Outreach Summary: This year's conference once again provided useful and timely information related to the Commission's Commuter Rail operations and LOSSAN Intercity representation. This was a particularly informative conference that started off with a Host Forum Presentation with the Chair of APTA Flo Castillo from New Jersey Transit along with the Federal Railroad Administration and Federal Transit Administration representatives, who emphasized the need for improved rail transportation and discussed funding challenges in operations and capital improvements. There were a number of workshop and luncheon events. The general luncheon hosted the new "Rail Safety & Security Excellence Awards." The closing session was a timely discussion of "Hurricane Sandy: Managing the Disaster - Managing Resilience." In addition to these sessions, the conference provided a unique opportunity for networking and to discuss the issues related to rail service with others industry leaders throughout the country. During the trade show, it was beneficial to learn about the new tools that vendors are using for corridor development, passenger counting, and fare enforcement. Also it was engaging to talk to others regarding PTC implementation and the challenges associated with it. Once again, the conference was a success and provided a great opportunity to keep up with the ever changing industry trends. • • Agenda Item 12 279