Loading...
07 July 9, 2014 Commission• Riverside County Transportation (omission MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside COMMISSIONERS .4ti Chair— Marion Ashley Vice Chair— Daryl Busch Second Vice Chair — Scott Matas RECORDS COMM-COMM-00038 Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside Jeff Stone, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Deborah Franklin / Art Welch, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / To Be Appointed, City of Blythe Ella Zanowic / Jeff Hewitt, City of Calimesa Mary Craton / Randy Bonner, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez / Eduardo Garcia, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Eugene Montanez, City of Corona Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / Ike Bootsma, City of Eastvale Larry Smith / Robert Youssef, City of Hemet Douglas Hanson / Patrick Mullany, City of Indian Wells Glenn Miller / Michael Wilson, City of Indio Frank Johnston / Micheal Goodland, City of Jurupa Valley Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann / Wallace Edgerton, City of Menifee Tom Owings / Jesse Molina, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Kathy Azevedo, City of Norco Jan Harnik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat / Paul Lewin, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Al Landers, City of Perris Ted Weill / To Be Appointed, City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar Basem Muallem, Governor's Appointee Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. Riverside County Transportation Commission TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Office and Board Services Manager DATE: July 2, 2014 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest — Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda of July 9, 2014 The July 9, 2014 agenda of the Riverside County Transportation Commission includes items that may raise possible conflicts of interest. A Commissioner may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 9A — Standby Bond Purchase Agreements Related to 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Series A, Series B, and Series C Consultant(s): Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. Jay M. Goldstone, Managing Director 4445 S. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 Agenda Item No. 9E — Agreement with Media Beef, Inc. for the Provision of Programming and Website Administration Services for the Commuter Assistance Program Consultant(s): Media Beef, Inc. Michael Hemry, President 6809 Indiana Avenue, #130 Riverside, CA 92506 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:39 AM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Jennifer Harmon Subject: RCTC: July Commission Agenda - 07.09.2014 Importance: High Good morning Commissioners: The July Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 9, 2014 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: Conflict of Conflict of [nterest Memo.pdf Interest Form.pdf http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/iuly-9-2014.original.pdf In addition for your review is the attached conflict of interest memo and the form. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant RCTC 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, July 9 2014 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — TO BE SUBMITTED AT NEXT MEETING Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 9, 2014 Page 2 6. PUBLIC HEARING — ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, AND POSSESSORY INTERESTS INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED THEREON, IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 118-270-023 AND 118-270-024; AND 102-290-001 LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected property and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolution of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the owner. 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 14-021 and 14-024, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Temporary Construction Easement, and Possessory Interests Including Improvements Located Thereon, in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024; and 102-290-001 Located in Corona, Riverside County, California', for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California; and 4) Continue Resolution of Necessity No. 14-022 to the September 10, 2014, Commission meeting as recommended by legal counsel. • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 9, 2014 Page 3 7. PUBLIC HEARING — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT SERVICES FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 33 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2014/15 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2014/15 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 14-023, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". 8. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS — The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR — All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 9A. STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS RELATED TO 2009 SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES A, SERIES B, AND SERIES C Overview This item is for the Commission to Page 54 1) Award Agreement No. 14-19-151-00 to The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (BTMU) for Standby Bond Purchase Agreements (SBPAs) related to the 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Series A, Series B, and Series C (2009 Bonds) for a period of four and one-half years, in an amount not to exceed $2.8 million; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 9, 2014 Page 4 9B. 2014 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 130 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2014 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. 9C. FISCAL YEARS 2015-19 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 2015-19 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted. 9D. POLICY REVISION TO THE PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Overview This item is for the Commission to Page 165 Page 168 1) Approve the change in the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) to eliminate Commission reporting of the existing mandatory and discretionary PIP targets; 2) Require operators to continue to report performance to the Commission individually via the Commission's Transtrak online software; and 3) Approve the implementation of the annual State of Transit Report in order to report on countywide transit performance. 9E. AGREEMENT WITH MEDIA BEEF, INC. FOR THE PROVISION OF PROGRAMMING AND WEBSITE ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR THE COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Page 202 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 14-41-156-00 to Media Beef, Inc. (Media Beef) for programming and website administration services related to the Commuter Assistance Program (CAP) for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $938,600; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 9, 2014 Page 5 • 10. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: • • 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; 2) Adopt the following bill positions: a) SB 1228 (Hueso) —Support If Amended; and b) SB 1390 (Correa) —Support In Concept. Page 202 11. PRESENTATION — STATE ROUTE 91 HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES PROJECT Overview This item is for the Commission to receive an update on the State Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes Project from Basem Muallem, Caltrans District 8. 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 13. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. 14. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting and is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, August 13, 2014, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONER SIGN -IN SHEET JULY9, 2014 NAME AGENCY E_MAIL ADDRESS D VZIork rgkiL i i Y) 3111/1. )(IL )7/ ,,V -- S /11,34_,/,444-- , 0,ze,x) VA-1-1," /116- / P.okw- 1 N km co ' e- ,D /vh, s )-,,, -.J m4 r-tiov1 tieelA� /7 G`-- &:-_,4.,0.-7- &et-, Q/44;22 EL-A .07Avi.e .�s, �: �'a�c. • Rd", Naha eRTs / I hccvLA- i-AR,R SnM C- 1-1 P al 'Z' P-IJ ,(9_, S o J U I ,✓ - ..i C,. --k\-\ E'�1 UA-U-0 wi S �‘.7,--T7— 4 ,5,- r5 i&vtic.) WfAs ,f),"7-- a (-po , . Ai �L, � �T jfg_.(' � 7-5-yr ,viyiZ •-/4.-4/L. J&J---- (var 1,�� �� kr(//� -c ,vo � ��� Co /rti a .rwl)e- 4._c_tto Ff q-•ce- s_z m � N I 'D ••EY -- o L A it L col so i a VVe n_< C\ I t ant-, NI, k kkd 71:\J i c, `i`LY1 / 7 -e,r ,i/ y v, , -(-z v k( (A /b47 I 6‘) LCpt,_218_17AL/ RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL JULY9, 2014 Present Absent County of Riverside, District I O County of Riverside, District II � 0 County of Riverside, District III X 0 County of Riverside, District IV )710 County of Riverside, District V A 0 City of Banning gl0 City of Beaumont � 0 City of Blythe O City of Calimesa � 0 City of Canyon Lake � 0 City of Cathedral City J" 0 City of Coachella if' 0 City of Corona ,� 0 City of Desert Hot Springs � ;II/ City of Eastvale ;?1(...,, City of Hemet 0 City of Indian Wells 0 City of Indio .21O City of Jurupa Valley � 0 City of La Quinta � 0 City of Lake Elsinore � 0 City of Menifee � 0 City of Moreno Valley � 0 City of M u rrieta k ,0( City of Norco 0 City of Palm Desert ,( 0 City of Palm Springs oir0 City of Perris � 0 City of Rancho Mirage � 0 City of Riverside � 0 City of San Jacinto AO 0 City of Temecula g 0 City of Wildomar ,A� 0 Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 ;2et 0 RCTC Conflict of Interest Form Purpose: This form is provided to assist members of the RCTC Commissioners in meeting requirements of 87105 in documenting conflict of interests as related to RCTC RCTC Commissioners may be required to disclose and in, influencing, or voting on an agenda item due to personal business positions, .or receipt of campaign contributions. If state the following information, for entry into the public agenda item(s) and turn in the completed form to the Clerk Government Code Section 84308 and Commission/Committee agenda items. Instructions: Under certain circumstances, disqualify themselves from participating income, real property interests, investments, applicable, Commissioners must personally record, prior to consideration of the involved of the Board prior to leaving the meeting. I. Board Member Information Board Member Name City/County Name Meeting Date I1. Campaign Contributions (For contracts, permits and other entitlements only) 1. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution and therefore I am abstaining from participation 2. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution and therefore I am abstaining from participation 3. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution and therefore I am abstaining from participation 4. I have a disqualifying campaign contribution and therefore I am abstaining from participation of over $250 from rA4 V.t 4-3-- ik /t-!•�((-7-sir , ildentifir the name of the company and/or Individual) on Agenda item , Subject:10 h ve c_ 11--vto /L- 07 (..c TI par s I�-/&.- cvveS' of over $250 from , (Identify the name of the company and/or Individual) on Agenda item , Subject: . of over $250 from , (Identify the name of the company and/or Individual) on Agenda item , Subject: . of over $250 from , (Identify the name of the company and/or Individual) on Agenda item , Subject: . III. Financial Interest 1. I have a financial interest of , from/in (State income, and therefore I am abstaining from participation 2. I have a financial interest of real property interest, investment or business position) (Identify name of company or property location) on Agenda Item , Subject: , from/in (State income, and therefore I am abstaining from participation real property interest, investment or business position) (Identify name of company or property location) on Agenda Item , Subject: IV. Signature Board Member Signatur, CC6e,--L_ Date: r) / --((f. Please remember you must state the information into the public record prior to consideration of the involved agenda item(s) and turn in the completed form to the Clerk of the Board prior to leaving the meeting. Please use reverse side of form to include any additional information DATE: DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD 7(1 011 CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: v PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: 11 (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) SUBJECT OFAGENDA ITEM: Announce NAME: ADDRESS: �Orard�v STREET/CITY REPRESENTING:56L.. I keVi! C4 I� 9 Af.fe 6 f 6-evit.r PHONE NO.: NAME OF AGENCY / ORGAN! TION / GROUP Arn.:4 Sqn t 17 c Sari (ft►t, Par SMmit PHONE NO.: Z 13 Z 36 "l j ZS 72,y<0 ZIP CODE BUSINESS ADDRESS: SA STREET CITY ZIP CODE DATE: -71°1 ilq DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD CHECK IF PUBLIC COMMENTS: O SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: ,Y) kiri 04 0- N e ce,ss Ire, o AGENDA ITEM NO.: � SUBJECT OF 1307K) -S IN? -Z10_o25/y Z II -t- (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) AGENDA ITEM' 2.t � yo_1 Covoiila ro W nB-� -7 NAME: Er; n . NoLc1e-fr i PHONE NO.: � � ''5 ADDRESS: ? �j Yi N i n ef cA STREET CITY / REPRESENTING: v 1C,l as Pa W,e,-f- PHONE NO.: NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP `'124%, zo ZIP CODE BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET CITY ZIP CODE DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: 779 //( CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: O PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) NAME: ADDRESS: REPRESENTING: SUBJECT OF j, AGENDA ITEM: 4 6,11410I�i STREET ?/1 ( 4/247141frC (1)41 o1(.��. NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: 64104 r ‘7411)1AF- CITY PHONE NO.: ZIP CODE PHONE NO.: 611. 7 21- 3 S Si STREET CITY ZIP CODE 2014 MOBILITY 21 SUMMIT • Uniting Business, Communities and Innovation 111, Merril ift EMBRACING OUR TRANSPORTATION • FUTURE I FRIDAY, SEPT. 5, 2014 DISNEYtANO HOTEL, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA WWW.MOBILITY2I.COM Mobility : THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COALITION Mobintyto' il One Raglan.**Vo aAO One FeNn r Titanium Sponsor CH2MHILL. One Region. One Voice. One Future. Mobility 21 One Park Plaza Suite 600, PM 183 Irvine, CA 92614 PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID SANTA ANA, CA PERMIT NO.949 14 MOBILITY 21 SUMMIT EMBRACING OUR TRANSPORTATION FUTURE as Uniting Business, Communities and Innovation 01 OI trit =U II Jill I MIR HEE THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COALITION Mobility ■ r One Region. One Voice. One Future. p , _ FRIDAY, SEPT. 5, 2014 DISNEYLAND HOTEL, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA WWW.MOBILITY2I.COM Titanium Sponsor CH2IVIHILL. HOSTED BY MOBILITY 21 PARTNERS `� �'r'e, Chambers of Commerce Alliance IIiEMPIRE 1 BCANONOMIC PAAIHE0.VnP OCtA Governments SAN BA Los Angeles Area Chamber. of Commerce CC) ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL ASSOCIATION Al SOS MOAN NTS .,•-•.,.; �ma..., 42) Metro 4e1 ADVISORY BOARD AECOM • Anaheim Transportation Network • CH2M HILL • HDR • HNTB Corporation • Imperial County Transportation Commission • Inland Action • Leighton • Majestic Realty Co. • Metrolink • Parsons • Port of Hueneme • Port of Long Beach • Port of Los Angeles • RBF Consulting, A Company of Michael Baker International • San Diego Association of Governments • Skanska • Transportation Corridor Agencies • UPS • Willdan Join more than 1,000 transportation, business and elected leaders at Mobility 21'S IP Annual Southern California Transportation Summit, Embracing Our Transportation Future: Uniting Business, Communities and Innovation. Friday, Sept. S, 2014 •8 a.m. — 4 p.m. Disneyland Hotel a 1150 Magic Way, Anaheim, CA • Meet industry decision -makers from Southern California • Network with more than Too exhibitors • Choose from eight engaging breakout sessions • General registration includes breakfast buffet, lunch, raffle tickets for great prizes at the closing session, complimenta self -parking or Metrolink and Anaheim Resort Transportation shuttle roundtrip service, and a twilight ticket to Disneyland redeemable after 4 p.m. THE LARGEST ONE -DAY TRANSPORTATION EVENT IN CALIFORNIA! • • A A A M • BI ITY2i.COM TITANIUM SPONSOR %Id/ CH2MHILL. PLATINUM SPONSORS A=COM of Leighton Consulting, Inc. PARSONS PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF RAILPROS SKANSKA VtranspoGRouP GOLD SPONSORS Costin Outreach Group Foothill Gold Line Hatch Mott MacDonald HNTB Corporation Jacobs Kleinfelder / Simon Wong Engineering LSA Associates, Inc. Majestic Realty Co. MBI Metrolink Nossaman LLP Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. Professional Engineers in California Government RailWorks RBF Consulting, a Company of Michael Baker International Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Transportation Corridor Agencies URS Corporation Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. SILVER SPONSOR Union Pacific Railroad Willdan PPER SPONSORS Berg & Associates BNSF Railway Company Cubic Transportation Systems David Evans and Associates, Inc. Dokken Engineering ECORP Consulting, Inc. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Fehr & Peers Gannett Fleming Group Delta Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Lea+Elliott, Inc. Mark Thomas & Company Moffatt & Nichol Port of Long Beach Port of Los Angeles STV Incorporated Sully -Miller Contracting Co. Towill, Inc. Transportation California Twining, Inc. VMA Communications, Inc. Watson Land Company -'NZE SPONSORS Anaheim Resort Transportation Anil Verma Associates, Inc. CH) Consultants Civic Projects Geo-Environmental, Inc. LECET Southwest Mia Lehrer + Associates MNS Engineers, Inc. Paragon Partners Ltd. V&A, Inc. IN -KIND SPONSORS Anaheim Resort Transportation DTNtech Marketing Solutions Metrolink Mouse Graphics RBF Consulting, a Company of Michael Baker International SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS AIA Los Angeles American Road and Transportation Builders Association CMAA Southern California Chapter FAST - Fixing Angelenos Stuck in Traffic Future Ports Golden State Gateway Coalition Railway Association of Southern California Safe Routes To School National Partnership Self -Help Counties Coalition SMPS Orange County WTS Southern California Chapters Sponsors current as °Dune 3, 2014. Visit wwwmobility21.com for complete list. SPONSOR THE SUMMIT Email Jenny Larios: jlarios@mobility2tcom tom Mobility 21 SUM it REGISTRATION FORM M ii a ■ joI!i .! 2014 MOBILITY 21 SUMMIT EMBRACING OUR TRANSPORTATION da .. 4. FUTURE oni: oiler" Mobility rim it d• Reyb,.OM Meta OM F,e•. + . go Uniting Business, Communities and Innovation axis Pi_ ! mom wrrrr m f - FRIDAY, SEPT. 5, 2014 DISNEYLAND HOTEL, ANAHEIM, CALIF. Titanium Sponsor CH2MHILL. Please type or print clearly and complete a separate form for each attendee. FIRST NAME ORGANIZATION LAST NAME TITLE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PHONE E-MAI ❑ Please check here if you need special assistance during the Summit ❑ Please check here if you would like a vegetarian meal ❑ Please check here if you do not want your contact information to be listed in the attendee directory How do you plan to get to the Summit? (circle one) Drive Carpool Bike Transit (Use registration printout or electronic ticket for free Metrolink and Anaheim Resort Transportation shuttle roundtrip service.) Registration Rates ❑ Early Bird Registration $25o (untilJuly 18) ❑ Late Registration $35o (afterJuly 78) ❑ Student/Military Personnel Registration $35 (Does not include twilight Disneyland ticket. Valid ID must be presented at conference registration. Limited quantity available.) Payment ❑ Check Enclosed CHECK NUMBER (Made payable to Mobility 21 and attendee name written in subject line.) ❑ Visa ❑ MasterCard ❑ American Express ❑ Discover CARD NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE a CHECK OUT OUR MOBILE APP! EventMoblcom/m4M2iSummit • Get the latest conference updates • Learn more about Summit speakers attendees • See who's sponsoring • Reserve a hotel room at the special Mobility 21 rate (available until Aug. 5 or until sold out) • Get directions • View conference layouts • And more! SECURITY CODE CARD HOLDER NAME SIGNATURE DATE Completed registration forms must be received by Friday, Aug. 22: Mobility 2i Registration One Park Plaza, Suite 600, PMB i83 Irvine, CA 926i4 Phone: 949.288.6884 Fax: 949.264.i456 E-mail: Sara Costin, scostin@mobility2i.com Advance registration closes Aug. 22: Limited space is available for on -site registration. There is an additional $25 fee for on -site registration. Registration forms will not be accepted without payment. Confirmation will be sent to the e-mail address given above. Badges will be held at the door. Cancellation Policy: There is a $25 non-refundable fee for cancellation until Aug. i, 20i4. Refunds will not be made after Aug. i. Cancellations must be made in writing. You may transfer your registration fee at any time without penalty to another person in your organization. Please contact Sara Costin at 949.288.6884 or scostin@mobility2i.com to cancel your registration. Mobility ii i THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA -r TRANSPORTATION COALITION One Region. One Voice. One Future. You Tube RFT iP WAR ON POV ERT A Summit on Advancing Southern California's Battle Plan for Victory - Poverty to Jobs, Workforce Development Tactics & Economic Growth Campaigns AVE THE DATE August 20, 2014 G 9:00 a.m. — ;00 p.m, aliforntin Science Center KO Exposition Park Drive, Los Angeles. CA 90037 EMStitmiERN CALIFORNIA tEAOENS IfIP COUNCIL 541:I71+Ei 4CfiliFORMA ASS 0CI*7IQN bi WWII Wei P 5 f WAR JN POVERTY ABOUT THE SUMMIT: in his Scats of the Union Address on January 6, 1J64, President Lyndon El. Johnson declared an "unconditional war On poverty in America." The President and Congress worked together to pass the Economic Opportunity Act, which was signed into law on August 2o, 1964_ Fifty yeOrs dater, however, poverty is. still a mojor challenge across the nation. Socicecanorn,c data p+ rented at the 2013 Southern California Economic Recovery Job Creation Summit showed that the Southern Cafifornia ran hos o much luwerthan overage eduCational attainment level, which in turn results in on olarmIngly law median >awerage household income 1eveFs and extremely high poverty rates. One - in -four children lives below the poverty line. Even offer fifty years, rnrxs} needs to he dome. The Southern Cbgforrka3 Association of Governments and the Southern California Leadership Council are hosting thrs sumrnt to help raise awareness. dpverup a braoa coalition of stokeholders tp help find solutions, Identify specific aCtioris needed to move people out of poverty Into fobs, assure Southern Callfcirnia's future prosperity for out economy and residents, and oUtline way: tar ottendees to get involved, Join us an WEDNESDAY. AU GUST2°, 2034, as we discuss pathways to lobs and opportunity that can 'Isla move more Of the reglon's residents from poverty za prosperity. Register tacitly at ► WW.SCAG.CA.GOVilyDVERTYSUMMIT or contact Jars Embry at (2.13) 236-1826 ,: r embrydn�oog.cu.cJov. rrNu m okytirt uuiw Yg23.e0te DMA � • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 PUBLIC HEARING • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Temporary Construction Easement, and Possessory Interests Including Improvements Located Thereon, in Portions of Certain Real Property by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024; and 102-290-001 Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected property and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolution of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report`. a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the owner. 3) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 14-021 and 14-024, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Permanent Wall Footing Easement, Temporary Construction Easement, and Possessory Interests Including Improvements Located Thereon, in Portions of Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024; and 102-290-001 Located in Corona, Riverside County, California', for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California. 4) Continue Resolution of Necessity No. 14-022 to the September 10, 2014, Commission meeting as recommended by legal counsel. Agenda Item 6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is being asked to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity for the interests in the parcels outlined in this agenda item. These interests are required for construction of the SR-91 CIP. The power of eminent domain is used by the Commission only as a last resort to obtain interests necessary for public highway projects after 1) negotiations have stalled; 2) the property owner has requested the Commission proceed directly to eminent domain for tax or other advantages; or 3) the eminent domain process is necessary to clear the title to the property. In this case, an offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner for the full Fair Market Value as determined by an appraisal. Commission staff attempted to negotiate amicable settlements in good faith, and will continue to do so throughout the process. Fair Market Value is defined by the state of California and is one of the most inclusive definitions in the United States. It requires the highest and best use of the property be considered. All of the Commission's appraisals must meet the California definition of Fair; Market Value. One of the requirements for acquiring property for improvement projects is that an offer of just compensation be made to the property owners of the property. The Commission makes these offers in person whenever possible. The amount of compensation is determined by appraisals prepared by independent appraisal firms licensed by the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers. The content of these appraisals, what elements are considered in them, and the methodologies used in the preparation are all proscribed by various laws and the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP), published by the Appraisal Foundation. The Federal Government recognizes the USPAP as generally accepted appraisal standards and requires USPAP compliance for appraisers in federally related transactions. Every appraisal calculates the market value of the acquisition as defined by the California Code of Civil Procedure, based on the highest and best use, as defined in USPAP, and includes consideration of severance damages and project benefits (also defined in the California Code of Civil Procedure). In every case, the property owner is invited to accompany the appraiser during the site visit so that as much information as possible is considered in the appraisal. A review appraisal prepared by a different certified appraiser is then conducted to ensure all proper procedures have been followed. Additionally, in accordance with state law, every property owner is offered up to $5,000 to reimburse them for the cost to have their own appraisal prepared. Staff will bring to the Commission those interests that meet one of the criteria above. The timing of these resolutions will balance the need to give the property owners as much time as possible to reach an agreement, while at the same time allowing enough time for the Commission to go through the process to obtain possession in time to avoid delays to the design -build contractor. The legal process from adoption of the resolutions of necessity to receiving legal possession of the properties takes approximately 150 days. Agenda Item 6 2 California eminent domain law provides that a public entity may not commence with eminent domain proceedings until its governing body has adopted a resolution of necessity, which resolution may only be adopted after the governing body has given each party with an interest in the affected property, or their representatives, a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4) The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. Since an agreement has not been reached with the property owners, it may be necessary to acquire necessary interests by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is accomplished by the Commission's adoption of resolutions of necessity for the affected properties. Record property owners must be afforded an opportunity to appear at the hearing and lodge objections. A notice of this hearing was sent by first class mail to the property owners, and stated the Commission's intent to consider the adoption of resolutions, the right of the property owners to appear and be heard on these issues, and that failure to file a written request to appear would result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission scheduled this hearing at which all persons who filed a written request in compliance with applicable law may appear and be heard. Aerial views of the parcels subject to this staff report in relation to the SR-91 CIP are attached. Staff recommends continuance of Resolution of Necessity No. 14-022 for the Corona Towne Center parcel to the September 10, 2014, Commission meeting so a revised offer can be made to the owners to reflect the reduced property rights being sought by the Commission on this parcel. A revision to the design and the areas necessary for the project has reduced the fee area needed for the project and legal counsel recommends a new offer be made to the owner before the Commission is asked to adopt the resolution of necessity. Finding 1: Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project SR-91 in Riverside County ranks among the nation's worst commutes where most motorists experience significant delays. Stop -and -go traffic is the norm, especially during morning and late afternoon rush hours. Traffic congestion on eastbound SR-91 between the cities of Anaheim and Corona is routinely among the worst 15 areas in the nation. SR-91 is continuing to experience increased congestion as a result of population growth in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties and the increase in jobs in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Demographic projections for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region show population and employment in Orange and Riverside Counties are forecast to increase substantially by 2035. As a result, traffic volumes on SR-91 are expected to increase Agenda Item 6 3 by approximately 50 percent by 2035, which would result in even greater congestion and delays on SR-91. The existing travel demand on SR-91 has led to a heavy directional commute pattern between Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside Counties that is projected to continue into the future. SR-91 is the only major highway that links Orange and Riverside Counties. Extending from the Orange County/Riverside County line in the city of Corona to Pierce Street in Riverside, the SR-91 CIP will add mixed flow lanes, tolled express lanes, improve interchanges, bridges, ramps, and local streets. New freeway to freeway ramp connections between the SR-91 and Interstate 15 also will be made. The SR-91 CIP is designed to reduce delays, improve air quality, offer a choice between regular mixed flow lanes and express lanes, allow faster emergency response, relieve local street congestion, and provide better access to public transit and rails. Finding 2: The Project is Planned or Located in a Manner Most Compatible with Greatest Public Good and Least Private Injury A thorough analysis was conducted to find the single best alternative for the SR-91 CIP. Environmental analyses and findings indicate the chosen alignment uniquely satisfies engineering, public health, and environmental issues, and is the most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. To minimize private injury, a thorough analysis regarding the need for each property and each interest was conducted in the planning stages of the SR-91 CIP. Efforts during the planning stages included conducting public outreach meetings and seeking feedback about the SR-91 CIP alignment and potential impacts. Staff also met regularly with various local agencies and businesses to determine if modifications to the alignment were necessary to minimize impacts. These efforts continued over the course of years to ensure the alignment design achieved the greatest public good with the least private injury. As part of the acquisition process, unless settlement was reached within the first 30 days after an offer was made, every property owner was provided an opportunity to participate in meetings with project staff. The goal of these meetings was to minimize private injury not only on the basis of information staff obtained through the planning process, but also on the information provided by the property owners. As a result, staff has in some cases included mitigation measures to reduce and minimize impacts to the property. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act has been satisfied by Caltrans' certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) in its role as lead agency on August 8, 2012, and the Commission's subsequent consideration of that certified EIR in its role as a responsible agency on November 14, 2012. Agenda Item 6 • 4 • • Finding 3: The Real Property to be Acquired is Necessary for the Project The property interests sought below have been analyzed to determine if a feasible design alternative that exists would alleviate the need for the interest. As indicated above, the property owners of the interests were invited to meet with project staff and provide input to address any concerns the property owners may have with the design of the SR-91 CIP in the manner proposed and the necessity of the acquisition. To the extent the property owners raised such concerns, staff took those concerns into consideration and attempted to make design modifications as feasible and possible. In the end, staff recommends the following interests in real property are necessary for the project. RON No. 14-021 — Easement Holder: Corona Towne Center, LLC, a California limited liability company; APNs 118-270-023 and 118-270-024; CPN 22217 The real property commonly known as Assessor Parcel No. (APN) 118-270-023 and 118-270-024 is now owned in fee by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The property was acquired through negotiated purchase from the prior record property owner, Agins Development Corporation, a California corporation. Corona Towne Center, LLC (Corona Towne Center), the property owner of the adjacent Corona Towne Center shopping center holds an easement on the subject property and is the owner of a pole/advertising sign located thereon. Accordingly, although the Commission owns the subject property, the property is encumbered by an easement held by Corona Towne Center including possessory interests therein. The subject property is located at 231 South Lincoln Avenue, Corona, California. The subject property is irregular in shape. The property is bound by SR-91 to the north with the existing SR-91 eastbound Lincoln Avenue on and off ramps to the northwest. It is also bound by other improved properties to the south and east, and Lincoln Avenue to the west. An offer of just compensation was made to Corona Towne Center for the value of the easement including any improvements pertaining to realty thereon on April 8, 2014. The Commission's design of the SR-91 CIP necessitates it acquire Corona Towne Center's easement including all possessory interests and any improvements located thereon. Accordingly, the Commission now seeks a resolution of necessity to acquire the easement interest, all possessory interests, and any improvements of Corona Towne Center. The entire subject property is impacted due to the proposed widening of the SR-91 freeway and resulting realignment of the Lincoln Avenue eastbound on and off ramps. Second Street will be extended west through the Corona Towne Center shopping center from the existing west 2nd Street/Vicentia Avenue intersection to the Lincoln Avenue/D Street intersection. The eastbound Lincoln Avenue on and off ramps will be realigned to intersect with the newly extended west 2nd Street through the subject property. Agenda Item 6 The legal description of the parcel in which the Commission is acquiring interests is an exhibit to RON No. 14-021. An aerial view of the parcel and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing was mailed on April 26, 2014. An Amended Notice of Hearing, which contained amended legal definitions, was mailed on May 27, 2014. RON No. 14-024 — Owner: Thrifty Oil Co., a California corporation; APN 102-290-001; CPNs 22166-1, 22166-2, 22166-3, and 22166-4 The real property commonly known as APN 102-290-001 is owned by Thrifty Oil Co. (Thrifty Oil) and is located at 1735 West 6th Street, in Corona, California. The property is roughly square in shape has a site area of approximately 22,474 square feet and is improved with an ARCO service station, convenience store, associated parking lot, and other improvements. The property is bound by commercial properties to the north, east, and west, and W. 6th Street to the south. The south side of the subject property is impacted due to the proposed widening of SR-91 and the resulting realignment of the eastbound S. Maple Street onramp. This onramp will include the addition of a retaining wall, which requires a temporary construction easement directly affecting the western frontage of the subject property. The ramp also requires a curb realignment, which directly affects the southwest corner of the property requiring a small fee acquisition. The Commission seeks to acquire portions of the subject property including a fee, permanent wall footing easement, and two temporary construction easement interests. An offer of just compensation for the property interests sought to be acquired was made to the record property owner on April 15, 2014. The Commission now seeks a resolution of necessity for the purpose of acquiring the property interests necessary for the project. Legal definition(s), legal description(s), and/or plat map(s) of the portions sought to be acquired are attached as an exhibit to RON No. 14-024. An aerial view of the parcel and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. The Notice of Hearing to Thrifty Oil was mailed on May 30, 2014. Finding 4: Offers of Just Compensation Have Been Made to the Property Owners Litigation guarantees were obtained from Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company to confirm and identify the parties with an interest in the parcels affected by the SR-91 CIP. The Commission then served the affected property owners and other interested parties as appropriate, with a notice of the Commission's decision to appraise the property. The Commission had the real property interests appraised by the real estate appraisal firms of Kiley Company and Integra Realty Resources to establish the fair market value of the property interests the Commission is seeking to acquire from the parties identified herein. Agenda Item 6 6 • • Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the property interests and, in the case of possessory and/or leasehold interests, to the affected tenants, based on the approved appraisals, as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. However, the Commission will acquire the fee, permanent wall footing easement, and temporary construction easement interests, including any improvements sought from the property owners and/or tenants through eminent domain, to ensure the property will be available to meet the time frames associated with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact due to adoption of the resolution of necessity. All property acquisition expenses are included in the SR-91 CIP budget. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 14-021 2) Resolution No. 14-024 Agenda Item 6 RESOLUTION NO. 14-021 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION ALL PROPERTY INTERESTS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 118-270-023 AND 118-270-024, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, WHICH COVERS THE AREA BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire all property interests including any and all possessory interests and improvements in all that real property commonly known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024, (Caltrans Parcel No. 22217) for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 9, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice, and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner and other interested parties were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for any and all possessory interests and any improvements in all that real property commonly known as APNs 118-270-023 and 118-270- 024 (CPN 22217), to be acquired from Corona Towne Center, LLC, is for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions and plat maps of the portions of the parcel upon which the fee, temporary construction easement, building access easement and building demolition easement interests to be acquired by the Commission are located, and which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; ( b ) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and/or depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. • • • Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of July, 2014. Marion Ashley, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • • EXFIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTON PARCELS 1 AND 2, IN THE CITY OF CORONA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP RECORDED JUNE 21, 1978 IN BOOK 51 PAGES 62 AND 63 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024 17336.02100\8818581.1 11 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 Telly 0st•so a ram ISSESSowVirPit.toVe$ COZY 'R 1 8 2,9054*ii.,1_, 574re 1,' ' ti .." ,r/ I. er- re,, ••••• r " (I7,4) i r ) t * •i 1 -."--• ------ ...' 41g• 4 • ....44"54) '1: 0 (21:5) ar erseAk..4* At., ItS) 451, / ogra. sr r as•rs *seem • mew. JIM= 2*g 1,-;44r 4tsz;4--,,zocK5. 414p a-, Pe PO 27 law rqs 0,1EINTY CM Ar. • HIG,410*-0 Pa? cyry CMW.4 ""•.- Poc 6'41.k 66 0 alas 1.47 —_ 0150 .4$ffi AW.51/62-63 Parc*/ Map 77-9 PM. 1415/9/-93 216947 TRA. 403 0°4-14., M8 1054/9.e,93 Tract No.2 m. a 942le Sil South Alver4i* Water Cower:), P41. 7/5t .R57 d9T4 ce3 • • 6-31,4-X1 //8-2i Corona Towne Center (Pole Sign) 118-270-023, 024 BILLBOARD SIGN .,"_= ... . • • ATTACHMENT 2 • • RESOLUTION NO. 14-024 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 102-290-001, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, WHICH COVERS THE AREA BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-290-001 (Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22166-1, 22166-2, 22166-3, and 22166-4) for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, July 9, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner and other interested parties were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for the fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of property to be acquired is for the SR- 91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the 14 California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions and plat maps of the portions of the parcel upon which the fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests to be acquired by the Commission are located, and which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) The property defined, described and/or depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interest subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interest to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to • 15 section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. • Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of July, 2014. Marion Ashley, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: (The rights being acquired may be exercised mutually exclusive of each other.) "Fee" (as to 22166-1) also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the portion of the property to be acquired. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement," (as to 22166-2), grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area. "Temporary Construction Easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project. As to 22166-3, such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. As to 22166-4, such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\8295546.1 • PS OMAS Caltrans Parcel No. 22166-1 Fee Acquisition APN 102-290-001 EXHIBIT `Al' LEGAL DESCRIPTION In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 21, 1980 in Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said land; thence North 09°27'42" East 6.00 feet along the westerly line thereof to a point thereon; thence South 48°01'45" East 7.76 feet; thence South 79°20'54" East 15.47 feet; thence South 10°39'06" West 1.50 feet to a point on the southerly line of said land; thence North 80°33'41" West 21.98 feet along said southerly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 51 square feet. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. M:\2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22166 APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-I-Fee.docx Page 1. of 12/ 18/2013 18 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PS OMAS 1 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 5 -� a� /2-/8-t.3 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 MA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22166_APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-1-Fee.docx Page 2 of 2 12/18/2013 19 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-1 FEE THRIFTY OIL CO. 51 S0. FT. 102-290-001 �l �/ o 102-290-012 -i 0 o 102-270-010 // N o �— o ' ti, , �°�, o �-6 I 9�% 0=06°53 25 R=34 3.00' PARCEL l // 1 1 A NO, 0l-05 // 1NST NO // 20� J �� l l �9 // O,R, /// �J I, 11 - S80° 31 '55"E 1 4 7.52' j / / BK.1980, PG.218368 O.R. -0-) N o 102-290-004 0 N ROR„ PARCEL J O 1 R, YOR2A TRACT 1 w loll , 5 , 2122 PARCEL l N'N N R ., S . �1 1135 �O Q N_ N a> 1` 0 - 61 ' o O 1 548°01'45"E 7.76' m z S79°20'54"E 15.47' O o ... — — — 51 0° 39'06"W 1 .50' �o —' — — — 1._____ PROPOSED R/W (2 21 6 6 -1 N11111.1ihm.- 21.9 8 ' "W POB N80° 33 41 1 50.00' i r) � r9 Q ------------------ W. 6TH -STREET _---- LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-1 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I �� FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (7141751 73734714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA: OF540 FAtt: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 2 0 91 4.3 1 1 1 2 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT 131' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22166-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 102-290-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 21, 1980 in Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said land; thence northerly along the general westerly line thereof the following two (2) courses: 1) North 09°27'42" East 109.02 feet to the beginning of a curve concave easterly having a radius of 343.00 feet and 2) along said curve 18.64 feet through a central angle of 03 °06'48" to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said general westerly line and said curve 22.61 feet through a central angle of 03°46'36" to the northwest corner of said land; thence South 80°31'55" East 3.29 feet along the northerly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 360.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 65°32'47" West; thence southwesterly along said curve 23.13 feet through a central angle of 03°40'52" to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 37 square feet. See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. M:12PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS1221.66_APN_102-290-0011Legals122166-2-Esmt.docx Page l of 2 12/18/2013 21 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS OMAS Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date I 2 _18-/_? MA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS122166_APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-2-Esmt.docx Page 2 of 12/18/2013 22 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-2 ESMT THRIFTY OIL CO. 37 SO. FT. 102-290-001 ,I Ln �� 0./� / 102-290-012 1 1 102-270-010 // L 0 c) 0 N o � PARG J // ILA No, O J - 05 4/ // J NsT NO. __ �° . // 2JJ l --b07 J D9 0 `�'0- // J,R, 7 s9- // /,p /l / S80° 31 '55"E 1 47.52' _ , 0=06° 53'25" R=343.00' L=41.25" ��II o 22166-2) , o TPOB� ► SEE SHEET 2 0 102-290-004 0 `, . N nl o O PDR ., PARCEL 3 Lc) w PARD L l N, TR , YoR8A TRACT R , 5 , 4J/35 v (Ni M, , g2 f 2 2 iv �O v.0 0 BK.1980, PG.218368 O.R.N rn ,- ° 0 rn Z 0 PROPOS D R/W N POB N80°33"41 "W 1 50.00' W. 6 TH STREET LEGEND (R) .Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning TP013_ True Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 1 1 1 I Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Ml7n373/(7t4)54590883 (Fox) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03/18/14 EA: OF540 FA4: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 23 91 4.3 1 2 tXh1113i I A, PAC, EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-2 ESMT THRIFTY OIL CO. 37 SO. FT. 102-290-001 �I /l /l 102-290-012 1 / / PARCEL I ti� / / LL A NO, 0 J -05 102-270-010 u'o / / J NS7 , NO, uN(,s / / 200I -607M-D J 57, / / O,,R, (:1)J 3.29',65032'4-1„w° S80° 31 '55"E 1 4 7.52' - / / =03°46'36' / A=03°40'52" R=343.00', A=06° 53'25" L=22.61 R=360.00' R=343.00' L=23.13' . L=41 .25' / / 221 66-2 N77°25'30"W(R) (R=343.00') / N69° 1 3'394(R) (R=360.00') II / / TPOB 0=03°06'48" / R=343.00' - / PJi� PARCEL 3 L=1 8.64' / 7R , YORSA TRACT I ,8„ 2/22 .4i PROPOSED RW ' / w I` BK.1980, PG.218368 O.R. LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing , 1 N rn POB Point of Beginning 1rn O TPOB True Point of Beginning O z ( ) Title to State I I I I I l Access Prohibited 1 NOTES 22166-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. All distances are I in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 5 10 20 30 PREPARED BY: DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA: OF540 FA#: PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa (7)4)751Ana, 7373/(7114)545-8883 (Fax) 8 R I V 24 91 4.3 2 2 XHIBIT A, PAGE 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1.5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `C1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22166-3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-290-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 21, 1980 in Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said land; thence northerly along the general westerly line thereof the following two (2) courses: 1) North 09°27'42" East 109.02 feet to the beginning of a curve concave easterly having a radius of 343.00 feet and 2) along said curve 4.22 feet through a central angle of 00'42'20" to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said general westerly line and said curve 14.41 feet through a central angle of 02°24'28" to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 360.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 69° 13'39" West; thence northeasterly along said curve 23.13 feet through a central angle of 03°40'52" to a point on the northerly line of said land; thence South 80°31'55" East 4.14 feet along said northerly line to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 356.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 65°22'27" West; thence southwesterly along said curve 1.12 feet through a central angle of 00°10'49"; thence South 24°26'44" West 37.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 113 square feet. See Exhibit `CT attached hereto and made a part hereof. MA2PTG0105011SURVEYILEGALS\22166_APN_102-290-001.\Legals\22166-3-TCE.docx Page 1 of 2 12/18/2013 25 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 PS OMAS 1 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 5 6 Prepared under the direction of 8 ,r 9 4► 10 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 l2- 48 -z3 Date M:UPTG010501\ SURVEY \LEGALS\22166_APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-3-TCE.docx Page 2 of 2 12/18/2013 26 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 EXHIBIT C2 PAR CEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22166-3 TCE THRIFTY OIL CO. 113 SO. FT. 102-290-001 11 to // o 102-290-012 _I o 102-270-010 /� // `_. 0 N 1 o � // PARCEL 1 I I A NO, 01 �-05 o ti, // J NS-r NO, _ _ �° // 200J-�07J�) `'(� // O,R., 9 // /QJ � / - 1��/ S80° 31 '55"E 1 4 7.52' ^ 0=06°53"25" 1L=41.25' irR=343.00' o 22166-3) o TPOB 0SEE SHEET 2 cn 102-290-004 _l 0 0 `� N o o w FOR, PARCEL 3 - PARCEL J N` TR , YOR�A TRACT OT � R „ S , 'f 1/35 �0 1 , a , 2/22 N ti. 0 o BK.1980, PG.218368 O.R. c, rn_ ° o rn Z p PROPOSED R/W o 6_.� POB N80°33'41 "W 1 50.00' - rM Q ro — — — — — — — — — We 6 TH STREET LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning TPOB True Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 1 1 i 1 t Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-3 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT I ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 7 Hutton Centre Drive Ste. 200 Santa (7141751-1373/(714)545§(Fox) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS p8883 R I V 27 91 4.3 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C2 PARCELit TITLE GRANTOR AREA AP 22166-3 TCE THRIFTY OIL CO. 113 SO. FT. 102-290-001 / / i / 102-290-012 / / PARCEL 1 2,N / i I A NO, of-o5 102-270-010 .(i. 20/ '� J Ns7 , No„ ,ate >oo J -�071 sl'7. /04) / 0,R, QJ ,Q) l ÷ ' S804°431 'S5"E iv/� 1 47.52' r N6.15°22'27"W(R) 0-00°10'49. R-356.00' L-1,12, A=03°40'52" , o A=06° 53'25" R=360.00' , L=23.13' R=343.00' L=41 .25' ° P 221 66-3 .i N7 5'304 R (R=343.00') 0=02° 24'28" R=343.00' - L=1 4.41 ' �79°49 58 WlR PROPOSED RW N69°13"39"W(R) 0 PDR PARGEL 3 TR , ` oREIA TRAGT AIJ,�� >l2� TPOB BK.1 980, PG.21 8368 O.R. 0=00° 4 2'20" R=34 3. 00' ,L, L=4.22' LEGEND �N (R) Indicates Radial Bearing PCB Point of Beginning TPOB True Point of Beginning � o cv m o rn o 0 ( ) Title to State 1 I 1 1 ( Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-3 Coordinates and beorings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT graund distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 5 10 20 30ill PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hu+ton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (714)751n 73734 7014)545-8883 (Fox) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 2 8 91 4.3 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS LIMAS EXHIBIT `D1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca!trans Parcel No. 22166-4 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-290-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 21, 1980 in Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence South 80°33'41" East 21.98 feet along the southerly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point Beginning; thence North 10°39'06" East 1.50 feet; thence North 79°20'54" West 15.47 feet; thence North 48°01'45" West 7.76 feet to a point on the westerly line of said land, said point lying North 09°27'42" East 6.00 feet from said southwesterly corner; thence North 09°27'42" East 14.00 feet along said westerly line; thence South 80°33'41" East 150.00 feet to a point on the easterly line of said land; thence South 09°27'42" West 20.00 feet along said easterly line to the southeasterly corner of said land; thence North 80°33'41" West 128.02 feet along the southerly line of said land to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 2,949 square feet. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. M:12PTG010501\ SURVEY ILEGALS122166_APN_102-290-0011Legals122166-4-TCE.doex Page 1 of 2 12/18/2013 29 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 PS OMAs 1 Prepared under the direction of 2 3 4 � 5 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 t2-/8 i3 Date M:\2PTG01.0501.\SURVEY\LEGALS\22166_APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-4-TCE.docx Page 2 of 12/18/2013 30 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-4 TCE THRIFTY OIL CO. 2,949 SO. FT. 102-290-001 �I �� 0 102-290-012 -1 _1 1 102-270-010 // I v N o // PrliiGr J L I A NO, 01 --05 `' ti, // 1NST., Nrj, - u'° // 2001 -6011 6 oN 9�� /� / _ �Ji/ S80° 31 '55"E 1 4 7.52' o 1 =06° 53'25" R=34 3.00' 8 I BK.1980, PG.218368 O.R. I _1 _ 0 PARCEL, 102-290-004 0 L� N 1 N o PJr� cD r \ r) r1 1\ r 1l Ln -rr�� r�rlrlrl -rr:rl�-r w J�/J,�� 2��7 Pr1i�c'rl J cv, i-���� ''rll�� • vr o PROPOSED R/WLv 0 0 22166-4) rn,—r ° z / � N48°01'45"W 7.76' o S80°33'41 "E 1 o � 50.00' N79°20'54"W 15.47' 6.00' �r N1 0° 39'06"E 1 .50' 20.00' 1 11, 1 , 28.02' POB21 , N80° 33'41 "W 1 50.00' 98 M TPOB 'srM — — — — --- - --- ---------- - _ - w__ 6 TH S TREE T LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State 11 1 I i Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-4 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Orive Ste. 200Santo (7141751Ana, 73734714)545-8883 (Fox) DATE: 06-28-12 REv.2: 03-18-14 EA OF540 FAu: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 q R I V 31 91 4.3 1 1 ZE JS Z901£ (NOI1DME SNOD A2:1V2I0d1411..) dal JS L£ (9NI100d 11VM 1NdNb'W2:1dd) dJMd JS TS ddJ ..._.__..__ T00-06Z-ZOT HO A14141 • ANGELO J. PALM ROBERT F. WALD ALAN H. WIENER` MICHAEL J. GREENE* DENNIS W. GNAW` DAVID D. PARR' CHARLES H. KANTER* PATRICK A. HENNESSEY DON FISHER GREGORY N. WEILER WARREN A. WILLIAMS JOHN R. LISTER MICHAEL H. LEIFER SCOTT R. CARPENTER RICHARD A. SALUS NORMAN J. RODICH RONALD M. COLE MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO STEPHEN A. SCHECK DONNA L. SNOW W - � I L I (, Co rs r.] \y"rr W W PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON IERI (1926-1996) RON (1927-1996) RVAN M. EASTER ELISE M. KERN MELISA R. PEREZ MICHAEL I. KEHOE CHADWICK C. BUNCH ANISH J. BANKER RVAN M. PRAGER BLAINE M. SEARLE ERIN BALSARA NADERI CANDICE L. LEE ERICA M. SOROSKV MICHAEL P. BURNS JOSHUA J. MARX ERIN K. OVAMA STEVEN R. GUESS KATHERINE M. HARRISON BRIAN GLICKLIN MICHAEL C. CHO, OF COUNSEL ROBERT C. IHRKE, OF COUNSEL JAMES E. WILHELM, OF COUNSEL DENNIS G. TYLER•, RETIRED 'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL 2603 MAIN STREET EAST TOWER — SUITE 1300 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-4281 (949) 851-9400 www.ptwww.com June 11, 2014 Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Re: Dear Clerk: RIVERSIDE COINTY R.� NSPORT TION COMMISSION P.O. BOX 19712 IRVINE, CA 92623-9712 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (949) 851-7294 WRITER'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBER (949) 825-5412 FIRM'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUmBERS (949)851-1554 (949)757-1225 mleifer@ptwww.com REFER TO FILE NO. 36964-000 r Corona Towne Center, LLC - Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024 (22217) RO N N)0. Our Clients: Cardenas Markets This office represents Cardenas Markets, the anchor tenant of Corona Towne Center, LLC. The purpose of this letter is to notify the Riverside County Transportation Commission that Cardenas Markets intends to appear and be heard at the Resolution of Necessity hearing scheduled for July 9, 2014. MHL:mp cc: Client 1246054.1 Jennifer Harmon From: Erin Balsara Naderi [ENaderi@ptwww.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 5:29 PM To: Lauren E. Murphy; Jennifer Harmon Cc: 'Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com' (Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com); Michael H. Leifer; Michelle M. Pase Subject: RE: Objection of Cardenas Markets, Inc. to Adoption of Resolution of Necessity pertaining to APN 118-270-023 and 024 Ms. Harmon and Mr. Easter, Due to the time constraints we are facing, we are supplementing the prior written opposition with the following. Please also include this email in the administrative record. RCTC's proposed actions have not been clearly provided. From what we understand, the RCTC staff proposal purports to be an attempt at substitute condemnation under the Eminent Domain Law. The substitute condemnation that we believe is being proposed is not permissible or authorized under the Eminent Domain Law. Thank you, Erin Naderi From: Lauren E. Murphy Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 5:04 PM To: 'jharmon@rctc.org' Cc: 'Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com' (Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com); Erin Balsara Naderi; Michael H. Leifer; Michelle M. Pase Subject: Objection of Cardenas Markets, Inc. to Adoption of Resolution of Necessity pertaining to APN 118-270-023 and 024 Dear Jennifer: Attached please find an objection to the Resolution of Necessity. Thank you. Lauren Lauren Murphy I Paralegal Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 13001 Irvine, CA 92614 Direct Dial (949) 851-7335 I Fax (949) 825-5449 1'almtlxi Tit !KL\"41lI&WU Email I Website m .1 ttit vN IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, only formal opinions satisfying specific requirements may be relied on for the purpose of avoiding certain penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) does not constitute a formal opinion satisfying such requirements. Accordingly, we must advise you that any such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other person as such an opinion for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. 1 Jennifer Harmon From: Lauren E. Murphy [Imurphy@ptwww.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 5:08 PM To: Jennifer Harmon Cc: "Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com' (Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com)'; Erin Balsara Naderi; Michael H. Leifer; Michelle M. Pase Subject: Taking of portions of Cardenas Markets' Business Location at Corona Towne Center APNs 118-270-034, 035, 036, 038, 039, 040, 041 and 042 Attachments: Letter to RCTC 2014 07 09 Objection to RON Corona Towne Center.pdf Dear Jennifer Attached please find an objection to the Resolution of Necessity. Thank you. Lauren Lauren Murphy I Paralegal Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 I Irvine, CA 92614 Direct Dial (949) 851-7335 I Fax (949) 825-5449 El 1'•11114,Wi NIri.:i'II1I11M[1g., Email Website IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, only formal opinions satisfying specific requirements may be relied on for the purpose of avoiding certain penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) does not constitute a formal opinion satisfying such requirements. Accordingly, we must advise you that any such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other person as such an opinion for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP that may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. 1 ANGELO J. PALM ROBERT F. WALD ALAN H. WIENER' MICHAEL J. GREENE• DENNIS W. GHAN' DAVID D. PARR` CHARLES H. KANTER' PATRICK A. HENNESSEY DON FISHER GREGORY N. WEILER WARREN A. WILLIAMS JOHN R. LISTER MICHAEL H. LEIFER SCOTT R. CARPENTER RICHARD A. SALUS NORMAN J. RODICH RONALD M. COLE MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO STEPHEN A. SCHECK DONNA L. SNOW W W PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM 6,Z WALDRON IERI(1926-1998) RON (1927-1998) RYAN M. EASTER ELISE M. KERN MELISA R. PEREZ MICHAEL I. KEHOE CHADWICK C. BUNCH ANISH J. BANKER RYAN M. PRAGER BLAINE M. SEARLE ERIN BALSARA NADERI CANDICE L. LEE ERICA M. SOROSKY MICHAEL P. BURNS JOSHUA J. MARX ERIN K. OYAMA STEVEN R. GUESS KATHERINE M. HARRISON BRIAN GLICKLIN MICHAEL C. CHO, OF COUNSEL ROBERT C. IHRKE, OF COUNSEL JAMES E. WILHELM, OF COUNSEL DENNIS G. TYLER*, RETIRED 'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL 2603 MAIN STREET EAST TOWER — SUITE 1300 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-4281 (949) 851 -9400 www.ptwww.com July 8, 2014 Members of the Board of the Riverside County Transportation Commission c/o Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 P.O. BOX 19712 IRVINE, CA 92623-9712 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (949) 851-7294 WRITER'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBER (949) 825-5412 FIRM'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBERS (949) 851.1554 (949) 757.1225 mleifer@ptwww.com REFER TO FILE NO. 36964-000 Re: Taking of portions of Cardenas Markets' business location at Corona Towne Center APNs 118-270-034, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42 Dear Board Members: Cardenas Markets ("Cardenas"), is the anchor tenant of Corona Towne Center retail center located on Lincoln Boulevard. Cardenas requests that this letter and its enclosures be made part of the administrative record on this matter. Additionally, Cardenas requests that RCTC's entire file, as it relates to this property, including, but not limited to, internal communications, reports, notes, correspondence and any submittals or communications with the City of Corona be included as part of the administrative record on this matter. This matter came before the Commission on June 11, 2014 for adoption of a resolution of necessity to authorize takings from Corona Towne Center. The Commission did not adopt the resolution of necessity and the matter was continued to the next Commission meeting --July 9, 2014. 1266315.1 PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON Jennifer Harmon July 8, 2014 Page 2 Since the June 1 lth meeting, Cardenas has been attempting to start a dialogue and meet with RCTC staff to discuss reconfiguration of the Corona Towne Center site. Cardenas has not received any meaningful response from RCTC staff. RCTC staff has not offered any comments to the Cardenas proposed reconfiguration plan. RCTC staff has not offered to meet with Cardenas to discuss the RCTC project or reconfiguration of Corona Towne Center. The correspondence between this office and RCTC staff is enclosed. On July 3, 2014, we received a letter from RCTC attorney, Mark Easter, advising that RCTC staff would be requesting a continuance of the Resolution of Necessity to S eptember 2014. In the event that this matter is not continued, Cardenas renews its prior objections made in its June 10, 2014 object letter to the Commission and Cardenas' counsel's comments at the June 11, 2014 hearing. At this time, RCTC should not adopt any resolution of necessity authorizing takings from the Corona Towne Center. Ver,truly yoi f- �," ,, iph el ter MHL:mp Enclosures cc: Client 1266315.1 ATTACHMENT 1 Michelle M. Pase From: Erin Balsara Naderi <ENaderi@ptwww.com> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 4:52 PM To: 'Mark Easter'; 'mlancaster@rctc.org' Cc: 'rgreenberg@gwtllp.com'; Michael H. Leifer; Michelle M. Pase Subject: RCTC partial acquisition of Corona Towne Center/Cardenas Markets' Site Please see the below message and attachment from Mike Leifer: Mark and Mark, We would like to hear back concerning Cardenas' proposed alternative design previously submitted last year to the City of Corona and RCTC's acquisition agent, OPC, and further discuss early next week. Please contact me to discuss. Very Truly Yours, Mike Leifer cc: clients Erin B. Naderi I Associate Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 13001 Irvine, CA 92614 Direct Dial (949) 851-7348 I Fax (949) 825-5426 Email I Biography I Vcard I Website IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, only formal opinions satisfying specific requirements may be relied on for the purpose of avoiding certain penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) does not constitute a formal opinion satisfying such requirements. Accordingly, we must advise you that any such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other person as such an opinion for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP that may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Michelle M. Pase From: Erin Balsara Naderi <ENaderi@ptwww.com> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:29 AM To: 'Mark Easter' Cc: Michael H. Leifer; Michelle M. Pase Subject: RE: RCTC partial acquisition of Corona Towne Center/Cardenas Markets' Site Mark, The alternative design that was submitted in the Cardenas objection letter to the resolution of necessity was the same alternative design that was submitted in 2013 to the City of Corona and RCTC's acquisition agent, OPC. Thanks, Erin From: Mark Easter [mailto:Mark.EasterObbklaw.com] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 6:07 PM To: Erin Balsara Naderi Subject: Re: RCTC partial acquisition of Corona Towne Center/Cardenas Markets' Site We need clarification as to which proposed alternative design Mr. Leifer is referring to. Is it the same design he presented to the Commission at the Resolution of Necessity hearing? Sent from my iPad On Jun 13, 2014, at 16:53, "Erin Balsara Naderi" <ENaderiPotwww.com> wrote: Please see the below message and attachment from Mike Leifer: Mark and Mark, We would like to hear back concerning Cardenas' proposed alternative design previously submitted last year to the City of Corona and RCTC's acquisition agent, OPC, and further discuss early next week. Please contact me to discuss. Very Truly Yours, Mike Leifer cc: clients Erin B. Naderi I Associate Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 I Irvine, CA 92614 Direct Dial (949) 851-7348 I Fax (949) 825-5426 <image001.jpg> Email Biography j Vcard 1 Website 1 r IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, only formal opinions satisfying specific requirements may be relied on for the purpose of avoiding certain penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) does not constitute a formal opinion satisfying such requirements. Accordingly, we must advise you that any such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other person as such an opinion for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP that may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication (or in any attachment). This email and any files or attachments transmitted with it may contain privileged or otherwise confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please advise the sender via reply email and immediately delete the email you received. 2 ATTACHMENT 3 GREENBERG, WHITCOMBE, TAKEUCHI, ( IBSON & GRAVVER, 1,11) 3+1(.3'1. Mil) ( GRFENUf I(.311'," Sx ,A owl! 1: eSl RRICK 1 0,3,1:11(I 1%A 3 L f (,3RSt uoNARD CiftAN SAMANTHA F 1.A MICHAEL WFINIIERGER AWL t, RENAVIDES AARON M LAVINE of.Disn'so ; 11 A VI 1 1RIS ;WTI I I Li' June 17, 2014 U.S% MAIL AND E-MAIL Mark A Easter. Esq. 3390 University Avenue, 5" Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Mark Lancaster. Right of Way Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside. CA 92502-2208 Re: Corona Towne Center Gentlemen: ndlf Ail El NO; 1- Ft" 1..‘f <SAk,T' rij,Rs ‘1: ()! k I 11 Cardenas Markets has proposed to the RC" CC a reconfiguration of Corona Towne Center (the "Center") to accommodate a redesign and relocation of its market, so that it faces .northward from the south-easterly quadrant of the Center, I am. told by its counsel Mike I„,eifer that the RC TC has declined to consider that proposal because of its belief that our client Hunt Enterprises. Inc., fee owner of the Center. does not support that reconfiguration, As I hope 1 made clear during the hearing of June 11, 2014, relocation of the Cardenas store as proposed is a necessary element to preserving the Center in its after condition, it will position the store properly, and open the parking currently behind the store that is of no utility in the present configuration. As I have also previously advised the RCTC in correspondence, and on Rine H „ the other necessary element to retaining a viable center is removal of the shops (with partial relocation) in the southwest portion of the Center, to enable enhanced ingress, of and circulation, and, we would anticipate, additional ingress front Lincoln Avenue. \ WI. ICI'S GREENBERG, VVHITCONIBE, TAKEUCHI, GIBSON & GRAYVER, 111, Mark A Easter, Esq. Mark Lancaster June 17, 2014 Page 2 Ou.r client would certainly be open to a resolution that resolves both issues, with appropriate mitigation a.nd compensation. We look forward to working with Cardenas Markets and the RCTC to that end. 1 would be pleased to discuss the matter further with yam. \ler truly \ ours, ichard C. Greenberg. For the lirm ec: Mike 1„,eiter, Esq. Janet Parks ATTACHMENT 4 ANGELO J. PALMIERI (1920 1000) ROBERT F, WALDRON (1927.1008) ALAN H. MENER• MICHAEL J. GREENE* DENNIS W CHAN• DAVID O. PARR' CHARLES H. KANTER• PATRICK A. HENNESSEY DON FISHER GREGORY N. WEILER WARREN A, WILLIAMS JOHN R. LISTER MICHAEL 11 LEIFER SCOTT R. CARPENTER RICHARD A. SALUS NORMAN J RODICH RONALD M. COLE MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO STEPHEN ASCHECK DONNA L. SNOW PALMILRI.TYLlR, WIENER. WILHELN1 &WALDRON RYAN M. EASTER ELISE M KERN MELISA R. PEREZ MICHAEL I. KEHOE CHADWICK C. BUNCH ANISH J. BANKER RYAN M PRAGER BLAINE M. SEARLE ERIN BALSARA NADER'; CANDICE L. LEE ERICA 18 SOROSKY MICHAEL P. BURNS JOSHUA J. MARK ERIN K. OYAMA STEVEN R. GUESS KATHERINE M. HARRISON BRIAN GLICKLtN MICHAEL C. CHO, OF COUNSEL ROBERT C. IHRKE.. OF COUNSEL JAMES E. WILHELM, OF COUNSEL DENNIS G. TYLER•. RETIRED •� PROLESS,OHAC G YkPLYx♦'f'.pH VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL 2603 MAIN STREET EAST TOWER — SUITE 1300 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-4261 (949) 651-9400 www.ptwww.com Mark Easter Best, Best & Krieger 3390 University Ave., 5th Floor PO Box 1028 Riverside, CA 92502 June 23, 2014 P.O. BOX 19712 IRVINE, CA 92623.9712 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (949)8517294 WRITER'S D,RECT FACSIMILE NUMBER (949) 825-5412 Fi RM'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBERS (949) 851 1554 (949)757-1225 mlei teraptwww, com REFER TO FILE NO. 36964-000 Re: Riverside County Transportation Commission - Cardenas Market and Corona Towne Center Dear Mark: On June 20, 2014 I sent you an email asking for you to call me to discuss the RCTC's proposed acquisition. In response, you sent me an email claiming that from your perspective, the property owner and Cardenas' concerns regarding reconfiguration and the taking were "compensation" issues and that they do not need to be resolved before the next Resolution of Necessity hearing. We strongly disagree. It was obvious from the public hearing on June 11, 2014, that the RCTC Commissioners were directing staff to work with Cardenas and the property owner to seek a solution. 1254253.1 PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON ;' Mark Easter June 23, 2014 Page 2 At the public hearing, RCTC staff represented to the Commissioners that they would do so. So far, staff has not made any attempt to work with us. On June 13, 2014, my office sent a message to you and Mark Lancaster stating that we would like to hear back concerning Cardenas' proposed alternative design. In response, you emailed asking clarification of which proposed alternative design I was referring to. On June 16, 2014, my associate, Erin Naderi, responded to you advising that the alternative design submitted in the Cardenas objection letter to the June 11 th hearing was the same alternative design submitted over a year ago to the City of Corona and RCTC's acquisition agent, OPC. On Monday, June 16th, I had a telephone conversation with you regarding this matter. You did not say that the issue did not need to be dealt with or discussed before the Resolution of Necessity hearing. Rather, then, you claimed that RCTC was stymied, felt its hands were tied, and did not know what to do because the property owner was not supporting the Cardenas' plan for reconfiguration. I promptly disagreed with you and advised you that RCTC staff was trying to set up an excuse for not acting and not considering the reconfiguration. On Tuesday, June 17th, the property owner's attorney, Richard Greenberg, cleared up RCTC staffs feigned confusion and again clarified that the property owner did support the Cardenas' plan for reconfiguration. I again reached out to you on June 20th, and now the story has changed. From staff, addressing these issues should be postponed until sometime in the hazy future. 1254253.1 PALMIERI. TYLER. WIENER. WILHELM &WALDRON4 Mark Easter June 23, 2014 Page 3 Staff has done the opposite of what it was directed to do by the RCTC Commissioners. It has done the opposite of what it told its Commissioners it would do. It is evading. It is feigning confusion and it is refusing to address the RCTC project, impacts and reconfiguration. Staffs conduct is causing even greater impact on Cardenas Markets. MHL:mp cc: Clients Richard Greenberg, Esq. (via e-mail) Mark Lancaster (via e-mail) 1254253.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Indian Wells (780)568-2811 Irvine (949) 283-2600 Los Angeles (213) 617.8100 Ontario (909) 989-8584 Mark A. Easter (951)826-8237 mark.easte rObbkiaw.com I NW BEST BEST & KRIEGER n ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor, P.O. Box 1028, Riverside, CA 92502 Phone: (951) 686-1450 I Fax: (951) 686-3083 1 www.bbklaw.com June 24, 2014 VIA E-MAIL - MLEIFER@PTWWW.COM Michael H. Leifer Palmieri, Tyler, Weiner, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street East Tower - Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 Sacramento (916) 325-4000 San Diego (619) 525-1300 Walnut Creek (925) 977-3300 Washington, DC (202) 785-0800 Re: Riverside County Transportation Commission - Cardenas Market and Corona Towne Center Dear Mr. Leifer: I am in receipt of your letter dated June 23, 2014. The manner in which Corona Towne Center elects to reconfigure its remainder property, in order to mitigate what it believes are the severance damages to the Corona Towne Center that will be caused by RCTC's SR-91 Project, is indeed a severance damages issue, as it does not pertain to the findings of need and necessity that the Commission must make in order to adopt a Resolution of Necessity at the Commission meeting in July. I am sorry that you do not agree with our position, but that is your prerogative. The rest of your letter appears to be bent on trying to create a paper trail so that you can "tell on" RCTC staff at the next Commission meeting and accuse RCTC staff of "avoiding" meeting with the property owners, or even "faking" it. To set the record straight, your office chose to wait until the evening before the last Resolution of Necessity hearing to submit objections to the adoption of the Resolution, along with a reconfiguration or mitigation plan that you never previously provided to our office. After the Resolution of Necessity hearing on June 1 lth, Mr. Lancaster met with Corona Towne Center and its legal counsel at the County Administration Building. You were also present. At the time, it was entirely unclear if the Corona Towne Center was in support of Cardenas' mitigation plan. In fact, the Corona Towne Center representatives expressed their view that they were more concerned with the fate of the smaller tenants at the shopping center than they were Cardenas Market. As a result, when we had our telephone conversation on June 16, 2014, I explained to you that I was not sure what you expected RCTC to do, because 1) it remained unclear whether the Corona Towne Center group was in support of your plan; 2) the plan has not been approved by 17336.02100\8919762.1 BEST BEST & KRIEGER 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Michael Leiffer June 24, 2014 ' Page 2 r• the City of Corona; and 3) it came unaccompanied by any appraisal analysis. You responded that you understood, and you further acknowledged that the only purpose of your inquiry on the previous Friday (June 13th) was to "get our attention". You said nothing about my confusion being feigned. Since that time, Mr. Grreenberg's office has confirmed that Corona Towne Center is in support of your client's proposed mitigation plan. Your letter now accuses RCTC staff of "evading and feigning confusion," but what are you specifically asking RCTC to do? RCTC is not the entity that would approve the plan. If you are alluding to who would be paying for what under your client's proposed plan, then those are, in fact, just compensation issues that are not going to be resolved before the next hearing, and RCTC is under no formal or informal obligation to resolve them before the next hearing. For the record, there is nothing RCTC is doing (or is failing to do) that is preventing Corona Towne Center and Cardenas Market from going forward with the proposed mitigation plan. Meanwhile, your ongoing objections and resistance to RCTC adopting a Resolution of Necessity is creating MORE uncertainty and confusion about the timing of construction and the need for implementing any mitigation plan. In that regard, it would seem to us that the greatest impact on Cardenas Market is currently being caused by your law firm. Very truly yours, (yr:C Mark A. Easter of BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP MAE:mvv 17336.02100\8919762.1 ATTACHMENT 6 ANGELO J. PALMIERI (1925.1999) ROBERT F. WALDRON (1927.190E) ALAN N WIENER' MICHAEL J. GREENE' DENNIS W GNAW' DAVID D. PARR` CHARLES H. KANTER' PATRtCK A. HENNESSEY DON FISHER GREGORY N, Weq,ER WARREN A. WHLIAMS JOHN R. LISTER MICHAEL H, LEIFER SCOTT R. CARPENTER RICHARD A. SALUS NORMAN J. RODICH RONALD M. COLE MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO STEPHEN A. SCHECK DONNA L. SNOW PALMIERI. TYLER, WIENC'R, WILHELM &WALDRON RVAN LI EASTER ELISE M. KERN MELISA R, PERE2 MICHAEL I. KEHOE CHADWICK C. BUNCH ANISH J.. BANKER RYAN L1 PRAGER BLAINE M. SEARLE ERIN BALSARA NADERt CANDICE L. LEE ERICA M SOROSKY MICHAEL P. BURNS JOSHUA J. MARX ERIN K, OVAMA STEVEN R. GUESS KATHERINE M. HARRISON BRIAN GLICKLIN MICHAEL C. CHO, OF COUNSEL ROBERT C. IHRKE, OF COUNSEL JAMES E. WILHELM. OF COUNSEL DENNIS G. TYLER", RETIRED 'A PRWE&g3 ilAt C4.,AASAAII,A1 VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL 2603 MAIN STREET EAST TOWER — SUITE 1 300 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614.4281 (949) 651-9400 www. ptwww. corn Mark Easter Best, Best & Krieger 3390 University Ave., 5th Floor PO Box 1028 Riverside, CA 92502 July 1, 2014 P.O. BOX 19712 IRVINE, CA 92623.9712 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (949) 851.7294 WR?TER'S DIRECT FAGS/MILE NUMBER (949) 625-5412 FIRM'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBERS (949)851-1554 (949) 757-1225 mleltereptwww.eom REFER TO FILE NO. 36964.000 Re: Riverside County Transportation Commission - Cardenas Market and Corona Towne Center Dear Mark: This is in response to your June 24, 2014 letter. Your claims that we are causing our own damage by asserting our constitutional and statutory rights to object to the adoption of the resolution of necessity are unfounded and inappropriate. That is especially so considering our objections are obviously well founded considering the RCTC Commission could not obtain enough votes on June 11, 2014 to adopt the resolution of necessity. Even more, the RCTC Commissioners repeatedly directed staff to work with Cardenas and the property owner. RCTC staff represented that it would. 1257595.2 PALMIERI, TYLER. WIENER. WILHELM &WALDRON3 Mark Easter July 1, 2014 Page 2 Some of those quotes from the audio transcript of the resolution of necessity hearing are as follows: Mark Lancaster: "And as always, staff will continue to work with the property owners in an attempt to negotiate a settlement." "We are definitely willing to work with Cardenas -- and the Corona Towne Center itself -- to come up with a viable site." "I, I think it's, as a good -neighbor policy, it is appropriate to meet with Cardenas, and I've actually been wanting to meet with them for quite some time." City of Lake Elsinore: ". . . ask our Staff to spend some more time with the Cardenas folks and the property owner ..." City of Palm Desert: "...understanding that we will continue working on what is best for the property owner..." Based on the directions from the Commission and staffs representations, we again reached out to seek RCTC staffs position and comment on Cardenas' proposed reconfiguration of the Corona Towne Center site. Yet staff has been silent. No comments have been received by staff pertaining to the Cardenas' proposed reconfiguration. Neither staff, nor your office, have offered to meet with Cardenas and the property owner. Further, claims that Cardenas did not provide its reconfiguration plan "to [y]our office" before the evening before the June 11, 2014 Resolution of Necessity hearing is absurd. 1257505.2 PALMIERI.TYLER.WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON� Mark Easter July 1, 2014 Page 3 The Cardenas proposed site reconfiguration was provided to RCTC's agent, Janet Parks at Overland Pacific & Cutler and to the City of Corona in April and May of 2013. The fact that your client and its agents may have failed to inform you of the same is wholly irrelevant. In your letter, it is asserted that the reconfiguration issue is simply a "compensation" issue. We disagree. This is more than a "compensation" issue. This goes to a fundamental element of the adoption of a resolution of necessity --whether the project complies with the greatest public good and least private injury. Further, if this were simply a "compensation" issue, why was RCTC staff and its agents working on numerous iterations of "mitigation plans" for the site? Why were numerous iterations of those plans submitted to the City of Corona, if not necessary? Why were RCTC staff and its agents meeting with City of Corona officials numerous times over the years? If Cardenas did not object and make its position known that site reconfiguration is necessary in order to have a viable site after the RCTC project and raised those issues for the first time later in the "compensation" phase of the trial, I am fairly confident that RCTC and your office would have been launching claims of "sandbagging." Cardenas wants to and is entitled to address with the RCTC the proposed reconfiguration plan for the site. Very truly yours, MHL:mp cc: Clients Richard Greenberg, Esq. (via e-mail) 1257505.2 ATTACHMENT 7 Indian Wells (760) 568-2611 Irvine (949) 263-2800 Los Angeles (213) 817-8100 Ontario (909) 989-8584 Mark Easter (951)826-8237 Mark,Easter@bbklaw.com Ids BEST BEST & KRIEGER g ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor, P.O. Box 1028, Riverside, CA 92502 Phone: (951) 686-1450 { Fax: (951) 686-3083 { www.bbkiaw.com July 3, 2014 VIA US MAIL AND E-MAIL Richard C. Greenberg Greenberg, Whitcombe, Takeuchi, Gibson & Grayver LLP 21515 Hawthorne Blvd. Suite 450 Torrance, CA 90503 rgreenberg@gwtlIp.com Michael H. Leifer Palmieri, Tyler, Weiner, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street East Tower - Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 mleifer@ptwww.com Sacramento (916) 325-4000 San Diego (619) 525-1300 Walnut Creek (925)977.3300 Washington, DC (202) 785.0500 Re: Riverside County Transportation Commission - Cardenas Market and Corona Towne Center Dear Messrs. Greenberg and Leifer: Please be advised that staff for the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") will be requesting at the July 9, 2014 Resolution of Necessity hearing that the hearing as to the Corona Towne Center parcel be continued to September 2014 so that RCTC can further review the project design and further investigate alternatives. Very,uly yours aster `for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 17336.02100\9065743.3 Jennifer Harmon From: Lauren E. Murphy [Imurphy@ptwww.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 5:04 PM To: Jennifer Harmon Cc: 'Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com' (Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com); Erin Balsara Naderi; Michael H. Leifer; Michelle M. Pase Subject: Objection of Cardenas Markets, Inc. to Adoption of Resolution of Necessity pertaining to APN 118-270-023 and 024 Attachments: Objection of Cardenas Markets to RON.pdf Dear Jennifer: Attached please find an objection to the Resolution of Necessity. Thank you. Lauren Lauren Murphy I Paralegal Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 I Irvine, CA 92614 Direct Dial (949) 851-7335 I Fax (949) 825-5449 Email Website IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, only formal opinions satisfying specific requirements may be relied on for the purpose of avoiding certain penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) does not constitute a formal opinion satisfying such requirements. Accordingly, we must advise you that any such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other person as such an opinion for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP that may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. 1 `, „ ANGELO J. PALM ROBERT F. WALD ALAN H. WIENER* MICHAEL J. GREENE• DENNIS W. GHAN• DAVID D. PARR• CHARLES H. KANTER• PATRICK A. HENNESSEY DON FISHER GREGORY N. WEILER WARREN A. WILLIAMS JOHN R. LISTER MICHAEL H. LEIFER SCOTT R. CARPENTER RICHARD A. SALUS NORMAN J. RODICH RONALD M. COLE MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO STEPHEN A. SCHECK DONNA L. SNOW w PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON IERI (1928-1996) RON (1927-1998) RYAN M. EASTER ELISE M. KERN MELISA R. PEREZ MICHAEL I. KEHOE CHADWICK C. BUNCH ANISH J. BANKER RYAN M. PRAGER BLAINE M. SEARLE ERIN BALSARA NADERI CANDICE L. LEE ERICA M. SOROSKY MICHAEL P. BURNS JOSHUA J. MARX ERIN K. OYAMA STEVEN R. GUESS KATHERINE M. HARRISON BRIAN GLICKLIN MICHAEL C. CHO, OF COUNSEL ROBERT C. IHRKE, OF COUNSEL JAMES E. WILHELM, OF COUNSEL DENNIS G. TYLER•, RETIRED 'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL 2603 MAIN STREET EAST TOWER — SUITE 1300 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-4281 (949) 851-9400 www _ ptwww. co m July 8, 2014 Members of the Board of the Riverside County Transportation Commission c/o Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 P.O. BOX 19712 IRVINE, CA 92623-9712 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (949) 851-7294 WRITER'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBER (949) 825-5412 FIRM'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBERS (949) 851-1554 (949) 757-1225 mleifer@ptwww.com REFER TO FILE NO. 36964-000 Re: Objection of Cardenas Markets, Inc. to Adoption of Resolution of Necessity pertaining to Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118- 270-024 Dear Board Members: Cardenas Markets ("Cardenas"), is the anchor tenant of Corona Towne Center retail center located on Lincoln Boulevard. Pursuant to the applicable legal documents, Cardenas, along with Corona Towne Center, LLC, is the easement holder and beneficiary of the sign pole easement that RCTC is purporting to acquire in draft Resolution of Necessity No. 14-021. Cardenas requests that this letter and its enclosures be made part of the administrative record on this matter. Additionally, Cardenas requests that RCTC's entire file concerning this proposed resolution of necessity together with the prior proposed resolution of necessity concerning the larger parcel, including, but not limited to, internal communications, reports, notes, correspondence and any submittals or communications 1266375.1 PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON Jennifer Harmon July 8, 2014 Page 2 with the City of Corona be included as part of the administrative record on this matter. Cardenas also requests that RCTC's entire file, as it relates to the Corona Towne Center property also be included as part of the administrative record on this matter. 1. To the extent that this Resolution of Necessity hearing goes forward, Cardenas' due process has been violated. Cardenas previously received notice from RCTC that the consideration of this resolution of necessity pertaining to APNs 118-270-023 and 118-270-024 would be heard on July 9, 2014. On July 3, 2014, Cardenas received correspondence from RCTC counsel, Mark Easter, notifying that RCTC staff will request a continuance of the Resolution of Necessity hearing to September 2014. A copy of Mr. Easter's letter is attached. That letter followed an in person conversation with Mr. Easter during which he informed that the Resolution of Necessity for Cardenas was going to be continued until September because of RCTC's schedule and plans to attempt to change the project. Cardenas understood Mr. Easter's in -person message and follow-up letter to mean that the resolutions of necessity that were scheduled to be considered on July 9, 2014 pertaining to Cardenas and Corona Towne Center, LLC (takings from the Corona Towne Center site as well as this taking of the sign pole easement on APNs 118-270-023 and 118-270-024) were being continued to September 2014. In a telephone conversation today, July 8th, with Mr. Easter, I sought to confirm the same and confirm that no action would be taken at the July 9th hearing concerning Cardenas and Corona Towne Center. I was very surprised to hear that the "sign pole" resolution of necessity was on the agenda. Cardenas' due process has been violated by the unclear notice of continuance and late notification that this resolution of necessity will be considered. Cardenas requests that this resolution of necessity be continued to September 2014 for consideration with the related resolution of necessity that also impacts Cardenas and Corona Towne Center, LLC. 1266375.1 PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON Jennifer Harmon July 8, 2014 Page 3 2. RCTC has not made a requisite Government Code 7267 precondemnation offer to Cardenas. Pursuant to the Grant of Easements and Agreement pertaining to the sign pole easement, the easement was established "in favor of and grant[ed] to the owner of Parcel 1 and the tenant of that portion of Parcel 1 which is depicted as "MARKET" on the plot plan which is Exhibit C hereto..." A copy of the recorded Grant of Easements and Agreement pertaining to this easement is attached hereto. To the extent that Staffs report omits Cardenas as an owner, it is wrong. Cardenas is the tenant of the portion of Parcel 1 which is depicted as "MARKET." Cardenas is also the holder and owner of the easement on the subject property. The Staff Report admits that the offer of just compensation was only made to Corona Towne Center. (Staff Report, p. 5.) No offer of just compensation has been made to Cardenas. Corona Towne Center, LLC's attorney, Mr. Greenberg, reports that he did not receive an offer of compensation based upon an appraisal. Government Code 7267.2 is very clear that "prior to adopting a resolution of necessity" a precondemnation offer must be made "to the owner or owners." Without a precondemnation offer to Cardenas, the RCTC Commission cannot make the requisite finding that is made in the draft Resolution No. 14-021, that "the offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made." (Staff Report, p. 9.) RCTC cannot adopt a valid resolution of necessity. 3. Any appraisal and offer must consider that this sign pole easement is part of a larger parcel. Further, this sign pole easement is part of a larger parcel and must be valued as part of the larger parcel. RCTC is purporting to take portions of the larger parcel in addition to the taking of the sign pole easement. No resolution of necessity has been adopted pertaining to those further takings. The extent of those further takings are in flux and may be changed. As stated above, no precondemnation offer has been made to Cardenas. Cardenas has not had an opportunity to review any appraisal of the interests being taken. However, it is unlikely (if not impossible) that the appraisal of the taking of the sign pole easement properly values and considers the larger parcel. 1266375.1 PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON Jennifer Harmon July 8, 2014 Page 4 4. The proposed resolution purports to contain an invalid delegation of legislative authority. The proposed resolution gives RCTC's attorney the ability to change the taking at counsel's sole discretion. Such delegation is an invalid delegation of the Commission's authority. At each of the resolution hearings on this project, staff has repeated how the Commission must make certain findings to authorize the specific takings proposed. The Commission is in fact required by the Eminent Domain Law to make such findings as the legislative body for RCTC. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1245.210, subd.(a).) However, the proposed resolution provides that counsel, not the Commission, "is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired." (Proposed Resolution, Section 7, last sentence [emphasis added].) The Commission should know, and in fact must know, the taking it is approving. Likewise, when RCTC is authorizing its attorneys to take property, the property owner and tenant are entitled to know what property and property rights are being taken. The proposed resolution fails to provide the basic and fundamental information of what is being taken. The proposed resolution is an invalid delegation of legislative authority contrary to law. It violates my clients' rights to substantive and procedural due process. If adopted as proposed, the resolution is void. 5. RCTC is incapable of conducting a fair, legal and impartial hearing on the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity. As a condition precedent to the exercise of the power of eminent domain, a public entity must hold a public hearing to determine whether a particular taking meets the public interest and necessity criteria articulated in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.030. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1245.235.) If, after such public hearing, the public entity determines that the proposed taking meets that criteria, then it must adopt a resolution of necessity before proceeding to condemn the property. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1240.040, 1245.220.) Implicit in this requirement of a hearing and the adoption of a resolution of necessity is the concept that, in arriving at its decision to take, the public entity engages in a good faith and judicious consideration of the pros and cons of the issue and that the 1266375.1 PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM &WALDRON Jennifer Harmon July 8, 2014 Page 5 decision to take be buttressed by substantial evidence of the existence of the three basic requirements set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.030. (Redevelopment Agency v. Norm's Slauson (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 1121, 1125-1126.) In the absence of a fair and impartial hearing, the resolution of necessity is void. Here, RCTC has already committed itself to the project and has contractually committed itself to the adoption of this resolution of necessity. The sole reason staff seeks authorization to acquire the property and property rights now is RCTC's contractual agreement to deliver the set right of way regardless of whether the proposed right of way is actually needed. This was again confirmed to me at a January 6th meeting with RCTC staff. Even so, RCTC has contracted away its ability to decide not to acquire or delay acquiring the right of way proposed. RCTC contractually committed to delivery of the right of way without actually knowing if the project as designed actually requires the proposed right of way. Adoption of the resolution under these facts is an abuse of discretion. RCTC cannot validly adopt a resolution of necessity at this time. RCTC must make a precondemnation offer to Cardenas Markets. At this time, RCTC should not adopt any resolution of necessity authorizing takings from the Corona Towne Center. Any consideration of this resolution of necessity should be continued to September 2014 or later. ,„ /./..":"." P ' �� el MHL:mp Enclosures cc: Client 1266375.1 ATTACHMENT 1 Indian Wells (760) 568-2611 Irvine (949) 263.2800 Los Angeles (213) 617-8100 Ontario (909) 989-8584 Mark Easter (951)826-8237 Mark.Easter@bbklaw.com ids BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor, P.O. Box 1028, Riverside, CA 92502 Phone: (951) 686-1450 F Fax: (951) 686-3083 www.bbklaw.com July 3, 2014 VIA US MAIL AND E-MAIL Richard C. Greenberg Greenberg, Whitcombe, Takeuchi, Gibson & Grayver LLP 21515 Hawthorne Blvd. Suite 450 Torrance, CA 90503 rreenberg@gwtllp.com Michael H. Leifer Palmieri, Tyler, Weiner, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street East Tower - Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 mleifer@ptwww.com Sacramento (916) 325-4000 San Diego (619) 525-1300 Walnut Creek (925) 977.3300 Washington. DC (202) 785-0600 Re: Riverside County Transportation Commission - Cardenas Market and Corona Towne Center Dear Messrs. Greenberg and Leifer: Please be advised that staff for the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") will be requesting at the July 9, 2014 Resolution of Necessity hearing that the hearing as to the Corona Towne Center parcel be continued to September 2014 so that RCTC can further review the project design and further investigate alternatives. Very, ly yours ar aster for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 17336.02100\9065743 ,3 ATTACHMENT 2 i. Recording Requested by Lucky Stores Lucky Stores;•Tnc. 6565 Knott Avenue Buena Paris, CA 90620 Attn: Duane T. Walters GRANT OF EASEMENTS'AND AGREEMENT THIS GRANT OF EASEMENTS AND AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made as of the a / day of A vu s'i— , 1986, by and be- tween ARNOLD-PACIFIC PARTNERS, a California limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as "Arnold"), and AGINS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Agins"). PRELIMINARY:' I. Arnold is the owner of that certain real property situate in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, described in,Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorpo- rated herein by reference, which real property is hereinafte: referred to as "Parcel 1." Agins is the owner of that certain real property so situate described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which real property is hereinafter referred to as "Parcel 2." Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 are hereinafter occasionally collectively referred to as the "Subject Property." The Subject Property is depicted on the plot plan which is Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. II. Arnold plans to develop Parcel 1 as a commercial shopping center. Agins uses Parcel 2 as an automobile sales outlet. As a result of the development of Parcel 1 by Arnold, it will be necessary for Arnold to grant Agins an easement for ingress and egress over Parcel 1 so that Agins will have access to adjacent public streets. Arnold and Agins have also agreed • 54;F,./- is ✓sti,✓iwt.✓414 4,AppoO✓ILA that Arnold snail have the righthto erect and maintain a pylon spy., towW. upuo CaL,el 2. The peLLIeD Veuine Lk./ knyvi Lie LVL Lhe necessary grants of easements by the parties for such purposes and to set forth their agreement regarding the�•use and operation of the Subject Property. For such purposes, the parties hereto 7/24/86-3 / � 1 do hereby Eix and establish the easements, covenants, and CAD restrictions hereinafter provided for on their respective par- t!, itr` cels. Said parcels shall be improved, held, leased, sold and/or 01 conveyed subject to said easements, covenants and restrictions. Such easements, covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and shall inure and pass with said property and shall apply to and bind the respective successors in interest to the parties hereof, and all and each thereof is imposed upon said property as a mutual equitable servitude in favor of such property and any portion thereof. A. EASEMENTS. 1. Arnold does hereby establish in favor of and grant to the owner and occupants of Parcel 2, their customers and invitees, non-exclusive easements Ear ingress and egress and for the passage of motor vehicles and pedestrians into, out cf, an, over and across that portion of Parcel 1 which is depicted as cross -hatched on the plot plan which is Exhibit C hereto. 2. Agins does hereby establish in favor of and grant to the owner of Parcel 1 and the tenant of that portion. of Parcel 1 which is depicted as "MARKET" on the plot plan which is Exhibit C hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "Market Tenant") an exclusive easement to erect and maintain a pylon sign tower on that portion of Parcel 2 which is depicted as single -hatched on said plot plan. The portion of Parcel 2 which is subject to said grant of easement is hereinafter occasionally referred to as the "Sign Tower Easement." The foregoing grant of easement shall entitle the Owner of Parcel 1 and the Market Tenant to install, maintain and operate such public utilities servicing said pylon sign tower, togetner with and including vaults, manholes, con- trols, conduits and related facilities, under, through,-erree and across Parcel 2• Said foregoing grant of easement shall also include a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress and for -2- 7/24/86-3 As uPxro '$y i'►►E _Dam) Aer.4 0/J ;hc parr Pi.s1/4.0 wtsCt1'Z6 k.X44,02:T" " ►tgaiTO; PaivAp,l, 1401,00 4,TriS 04W14Wt OF ?ARM'. o'L sHALL AA.% TT1rc KT6.14'r 1t5 F4locorre. SUCH Al2.0-rt.v+=izaKas Segti tE401, 64,ex PVLOt-1 er61w1•s01oE.a,7061E-T►EA 10=14 Aaer.n3avb1.4h tlauirS,r-tkOsoa.es, coo-rems, coi,PoowrS fyN1, racsi.yrs4,5, VNfilFrR,-Notot rl Prr b ACceo$S WeAge-w.rxri 1-1402:coR ‘,..5errVIEA3 Perkovod. oP-r4q. Ou.1+JE4 OF PAeCEu 1 W NTGN4 AMovAt.. Swgtl. wiar Vw_ vaRCAsONAlay wrrr1HEL.O. 0) O Npassage of motor vehicles and pedestrians into, out of, on, over and across all parking areas and driveways from time to time established on Parcel 2 necessary or appropriate for use in con- junction with the Sign Tower Easement. B. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND INSURANCE. 1. Except as hereinafter provided, each owner of any portion of the Subject Property shall, at its sole expense, cause the same to be maintained in good condition and repair. The owner of any portion of the Subject Property shall not have any obligation to maintain or to incur any expense for the main- tenance of a portion of the Subject Property owned by another owner. 2. The owner of Parcel 1 snail, at its sole expense, maintain the Sign Tower Casement and any improvements erected there..n in good condition and repair. J. Each owner of any portion of the Subject Prop- erty shall provide ample and adequate parking for its customers, employees ana invitees on the portion of the Subject Propvty owned by said owner. No owner of any portion of the Subject Property, or any occupant thereof, shall have any right to ailow its employees, invitees, customers or, in the case of the owner of Parcel 2, its inventory of automobiles, to be parked upon a portion of the Subject Property owned by another owner. Any automobile parked in violation of this Section 3 shall be subject to towing at the direction of the owner upon whose property the parking violation has occured (and, in the event that said parking violation occurs on Parcel 1, at the direction of the OF HE i•iaai.ct. Icumm.). Saiu Luwii,y aiiaii uc ai. the CApense a 4.im L.anece%nvmdITLE who is either in violation hereof or whose occupant is in violation hereof. erne nnetner o.�nt -3- 7/24/86-3 C) co tD >n • -b }-af t h i h • hi -f 4. (a) Each owner shall obtain and maintain gen- eral public liability insurance with respect to the portion of the Subject Property it is obligated to maintain hereunder, insuring all persons who now or hereafter own or hold portions of the Subject Property or a leasehold estate or other interest therein as their respective interests may appear (provided that such owner is notified in writing of such interest, against claims for personal injury, death or property damage occurring in, upon, or about the portion of the Subject Property to be insured by said owner. Such insurance shall be written with an insurer licensed to ao business in the State of California. The limits of liability of such insurance shall be at least Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.001 combined single limit for injury to or death of any number of persons or for damage to property of others arising out of any one occurrence. Each owner shall cause to be issued certificates of insurance to each of the other owners of the Subject Property, and to the Market Tenant, which certificates shall provide that such insurance shall not be cancelled or amended without ten (10) days prior written notice to each of said parties. (b) If any such owner shall fail to provide ouch ineu. , ghee other cf portioncf the Eubjzot Property or the Market Tenant may do so, and the curing owner or tenant may thert bill the defaulting owner for the expense in- -4- 7/24/ 86-3 dti G co In curved. If the defaulting owner snail not pay said bill within N fifteen (15) days, p he deEauiti �e ill, lerieb s delinquent amount shall bear interest at the highest annual rate of interest not prohibited by law until paid. C. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. The owner of Parcel 1 shall have the first right of refusal to purchase Parcel 2 should Agins decide to sell, convey, lease or otherwise transfer its interest in Parcel 2. The owner of Parcel 1 shall have ninety (90) days to exercise its option to purchase Parcel 2. The purchase price for Parcel 2 shall be at fair market value as determined by an independent appraiser to be agreed upon by the owner,of Parcel 1 and Agins. If said parties are unable to agree upon an appraiser, the owner of Parcel 1 and Agins shall each appoint its own appraiser and each such appraiser shall produce its own appraisal and the average of the two (2) appraisals shall be the purchase price for Parcel 2. D. RESTRICTION. No portion of Parcel 2 shall be occupied or used, di- rectly or indirectly, for the purposes of a general market or grocery store, meat market, fish market, fruit store, vegetable store, delicatessen, pharmacy or store selling alcoholic beve- ra E or an combination thereof. GrHEA-MAW AREsrmuRgksr tar►+ �caa6E g y Fog ON PRErix,st, eorasunPru„Z OF Mi-torlolxt '6EvitAlSe1 E. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. COVENANTS RUN WITH THE LAND. (a) Each easement, restriction and covenant contained herein shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of all portions of the Subject Property and shall be a burden there- on °aG: L„c yr all Nv4.61vua yr 46c SubjeLL PiwpeiLy Qua shall run with the land. it') This Agreement and the easements, re- strictions, covenants, benefits and obligations created hereby -5- 7/24/86-2 shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors, transferees and assigns; provided, however, that if any owner sells any portion or all of its interest in the Subject Property and obtains from the'pur- chaser thereof an agreement 6hereby the purchaser assumes ano agrees to be bound by the covenants and agreements herein con- tained, the vendor shall thereupon be released and discharged from any all further obligations under this Agreement as such owner in connection with the portion of the Subject Property sold by it. 2. ARCHITECTURAL AESTHETICS. The structures to be erected on Parcel 2 shall be constructed in a style reasonably compatible with the ambience projected by the improvements erected on Parcel 1. The owner of Parcel 2 shall deliver the plans and specifications for any proposed improvements to be erected on Parcel 2 (except for the Sign Tower Easement) to the owner of Parcel 1 no later than sixty (60) days prior to the commencement of construction any such improvements on Parcel 2. The owner of Parcel 1 shall have the right to apprave said plans and specifications in order to ensure the architectural compatibility of the structures proposed to be erected on Parcel 2 with the structures erected on Parcel 1. 3. ENFORCEMENT OF LIEN. be filed for record by the party entitled hereto as = aim of lien against the defaulting owner in the 0 e of the County Recorder of Riverside County, s and verified, which shall contain at least; xpenses; (a) A statement of the unpaid amount of costs In accordance with this paragraph 2, in the event the owner of Parcel 2 as part of the developnent of said parcel, brings the grade of Parcel 2 to a level even with the then existing grade of Parcel 1, the owner of Parcel 2 shall have the right, at its sole cost and expense, to remave the then ex - retain wall (if any) situated on the property line between Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 an may otherwise integrate the parking areas on Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 consistent with the existing parking configuration of Parcel 1. v' Isastcr To mg. Flew -ES E,,,re" s+�ro-A+V AmexibHr+ui-'v ntcs 7/24/86-3 sa-rrstu Ag,£eerhEar o•u -m9-KS se rzsgAcio2Y Tp rife Pterzes T..rig¢Cr4oTrxml PARCeL 1 Av4S. PPrRcgt 2.) GO td U3 NM 0! which is the subject of the lien; and (c) The name of the owner o reputed owner of the property which Is the subject of the eged lien. Such lien, when so established against t real property described in said lien, shall be prior and,,e‘erior to any right, title, interest, lien or claim.idiich may be or has been acquired or attached to such reel property after the time of filing of such lien. Such lien shall be for the use and benefit of the person filin• ame, and may be enforced and foreclosed in a suit or 4• DURATION. Except 'as otherwise provided herein, each easement/ contained in this '.02/ACtvorL *OW) 6fic14 cootivolNr, REs•ntscr.0 Anil. Agreement shall be for a term of duty five {65y yaarc from tho Vn2DarAlitsAi cow s.J 77+s611AteetleA, r 5a�u L 'Si c Fr.ke 4 -+ER•1 OIL sS4:7.56e0 E 64) date kereof. ycAMC F,eDe.r -045Z47E 410.ee0r. 5, INJUNCTIVE RCLIEF. In the event or any violation or threatened violation by any miner, tenant, or occupant of any portion of the Subject Property of any of the terms, covenants, restrictions and conditions contained herein, in addition to the other remedies herein provided, any or all of the owners and tenants of the property included within the Subject Property shall have the right to enjoin such violation or threatened violation in a court of competent jurisdiction. 6. AMENDMENT. This Agreement may not be modified, in any respect whatsoever, or rescinded, in whole or in part, without Market Tenant, and then only by•a written instrument duly executed and acknowledged by the requisite owners and tenant, duly recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Riverside -7- 7/24/86-2 0) 00 N a N County. Except for the consent of the Market Tenant, no tenant shall be required to join in the execution of any amendment or rescission of this Agreement. 7. NOT A PUBLIC DEDICATION. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Subject Property to the general public or for the general public or for any public purposes whatsoever, it being the intention of the parties hereto that this Agreement shall be strictly limited to and for the purposes herein expressed. B. BREACH SHALL NOT PERMIT TERMINATION. No breach of this Agreement shall entitle any owner to cancel, rescind.or otherwise terminate this Agreement, but such limitation shall not effect in any manner any other rights or remedies which such owner, or any tenant, may have hereunder by reason of any breach of this Agreement. Any breach of any of said covenants or restrictions shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good Eaith E.,r value, but such covenants or restrictions shall be binding upon and effective against such owner of any of said property or any portion thereof whose title thereto is acquired by foreclosure, trustee sale or otherwise. 9. SEVERABILITY. If any clause, sentence or other portion of this Agreement shall become illegal, null or void for any reason, or shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be so, the remaining portions hereof shall remain in full Eorce and effect. 10. SUBSEOUENT CONVEYANCES. All conveyances of all or any portion of the Subject Property subsequent to the date hereof shall recite that they are subject and subordinate to the terms and provisions -a- 7/24/86-2 Cr) co co er hereof. 11. NOTICES. Any notice from one party to another shall be delivered either personally or via United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage fully prepaid, addressed to the p.mrties as follows: Owner of Parcel 1: Arnold -Pacific Partners 1254 Irvine Boulevard Suite 210 Tustin, CA 92680 Owner of Parcel 2: Agins Auto Any such notice shall be deemed delivered upon personal service or forty, eight (48) hours after the time of deposit of such notice in the United States mail, as the case may be. In the event either party changes its address, such change of address shall be communicated to the other party in the manner set forth in this Section 11. 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties nereto with regard to the matters set forth herein and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements between the parties hereto. There are no representations» warranties, agreements, arrangements or under- standings, oral or written, between the parties relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement that are not fully expressed in this Agreement. 13. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event that either party, or a successor tr.: required to (a) camzanca any acLian or pro ceeding against another by reason of any breach or claimed breach of any provision of this Agreement, (b) commence any action in any way connected with this Agreement, or (c) seek a judicial -9- 7/24/86-3 .r C1! op tD u5 a .r• I declaration of rights under this Agreement, the party prevailing in such•agtion or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the other party the prevailing party's actual attorneys' fees and costs including, but not limited to, all witness fees and associated expenses, whether or not the proceeding or action proceeds to judgment. 14. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State or California. 15. HEADINGS AND CAPTIONS. The headings and captions at the beginning of the various sections and subsections of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a substantive part of this Agreement'and shall t not in any way define, limit, expand or effect any provision of ► this Agreement. 16. FURTHER ACTS. Each party shall perform any further act and shall -sign and deliver any further document that is reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. 17. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. With 'regard to the parties' performance of their respective obligations under this Agreement, time is expressly of the essence. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly exe- cuted this Agreement as of the day and year first hereinabove set forth. ARNOLD-PACIFIC PARTNERS, AGINS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California limi�ed partnership a California corporation By By. (To Be Notarially Acknowledged) -10- By 42.144d By R.,3.4ted 7/24/86-3 l tPutmetship) STATE OF CALIFORNIA co OrVCOUNTY OF nPAN6E }. SS. GO lA c sOn this 49 day of �'uL.Ni • rt t f hit/0 Al . Vgi. 1 __4Y7L fnS pAiD p+.ald1 1 parrsaul16ly known in me (biproved to one an the bath of satishetoty evidence) to be the { behalf of the partnership and ecknowledeed to me that the partnership exauied h. WITNESS my -twin and official seal. Walloure t-.��N.ct�J�,r% C((/J ✓,F' Name ur Printed) 13 No rev. 143 PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGMENT \ State 01 CALIFOENTik County of ORANGE �Y�-- OFFICIAL SEAL ' ,,. ,JAN OLAN£ KRUGER • "".T,I`d 110fART PLIBLIC.CALtFORNIA t l "0 �! ORANGE COUNTY '�i...1- My Camino rn ¢soap Mar.79.1911/ SS. STEWART TITLE AL":3 xran ./ fern, In du year ih3 before me I !moonily appeared hat eseented this iswumans. an olrica UNOA bS. YAI.ER NorRsyrus or: . � atiNte, c,..4 Yd [.xw,N,l�i Y 1407 Mila arm for °Metal notatlal seal) On this the 29�day of July Jan Deane Kruger NO. ads 19 86 , before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personalty appeared Jerry S. Arnold and P. Patterson willsel 0 personally known to me git proved to me on the basis 431 satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who executed the within instrument on behalf of the partnership, and acknowledged to me that the partnership executed it. WITNESS my hand and official s Notary's signature / Jar► Matte of co GD THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CORONA, COUNTY OF 0A RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING THE NORTH HALF, THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF AND THE WEST 151.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 2.50 ACRES OF LOT 3, THE WESTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 4 AND THE WESTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 2.50 ACRES OF LOT 5, EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 20.00 FEET,OF,SAID WESTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 2.50 ACRES OF LOT 5, IN BLOCK 66 OF THE LANDS OF' SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND WATER COMPANY AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 9, PAGES 6 AND 8 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 51 AND PARCELS 3 AND 4 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 51, PAGES 62 AND 63, BOTH OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; DESCRIPTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CITY OF CORONA BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 NORTH 7° 35' 35" EAST, 528.01 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 82° 25' 37" EAST, 5.00 FEE' TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL l; THENCE ALONE THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AND ALONG THE. WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 NORTH 7O 35' 35" EAST, 130.71 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 4 AND ALONG THE FORTHERW UNE OF SAID PARCEL 3 THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 82° 23' 4S" PART. 297.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.00 FEET; EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 72.60 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27° 43' 49" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 3 • SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 20° CO 1 07' 37" WEST; EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 72.51 FEET N THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27° 41e 53" ; AND SOUTH 82° 25' 45" EAST, 384.62 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 SOUTH 7° 39' 22" WEST, 53.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 49, PAGE 15 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 SOUTH 82° 25' 28" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 10.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 10.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 4 SOUTH 7° 39' 22" WEST, 374.87 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 4; THENCE ALONG SAID.SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 82° 22' 02" WEST, 10.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 7° 39' 22" WEST, 131.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 3; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 82° 31' 03" WEST, 674.65 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST 151.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 2.50 ACRES OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 7° 35' 35" WEST, 131.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 82° 31' 38" WEST, 151.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK 66 OF THE LANDS OF SOUTH RIVERSIDE LAND AND WATER COMPANY SOUTH 7° 39' 22" WEST, 111.57 EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 3 • or). co w N FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 6 NORTH 82° 25' 37" WEST, 33.82 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 3 NORTH So 55' 43" WEST, 49.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY NORTHERLY, NORTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 93.01 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 106° 35' 04" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT A Page 3 of 3 co EXHIBIT $ EXHIBIT B All that real property situated in the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map recorded June 21, 1978 in Book 51 of Parcel Maps at'pages fit to 63 in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, California. EXHIBIT EXHIBIT $. r fiViico .1411. In.- f 1,,., 1 -. yr 1 !nlltsirr inl1S,� r 11 TIV 11 - �I Iia i— \X i it •J.AKA Nq ��-Y-�-a✓ 4r..NHS h4YY LW'.W.K. If M14' 1(Jt 171 W0 LI'1-W.�•i r $c,C;.;• 11.44. o iiFt5i1 . t • 1 t I i i EXHIBIT C 7 .Actinn.. 0 • IYMXIP.M.RROvelfi I Al.IMUTSC Indian Wells (760) 568-2611 Irvine (949) 263-2600 Los Angeles (213) 617-8100 Ontario (909) 989-8584 11119111°R. BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor, P.O. Box 1028, Riverside, CA 92502 Phone: (951) 686-1450 I Fax: (951) 686-3083 I www.bbklaw.com Margaret L. Barnes (951) 826-8357 margaret.barnes@bbklaw.com File No. 17336.02100 May 28, 2014 VIA BAND DELIVERY Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 Sacramento (916) 325-4000 San Diego (619) 525-1300 Walnut Creek (925) 977-3300 Washington, DC (202) 785-0600 DECEIVE 1111 MAY 28 2014 TRANSPO RAITIIQN uoMM►SSION Re: Notice of Hearing to Property Owners as to Corona Towne Center, LLC (for property owned previously owned by A_gin� now owned by RCTC) (Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024, CPN 22217); and VEJ Corona LP (Assessor Parcel No. 118-050-002, CPN 22171-1) RCTC/SR91 CIP Project Dear Jennifer: COON No. -021 Attached are the original Notices of Hearing to Property Owners, with proofs of mailing, of the hearing on the adoption of resolutions of necessity scheduled for July 9, 2014, as to an easement interest, including any and all possessory interests and any improvements (a pole sign), of Corona Towne Center, Inc. (formerly owned by Agins Development, now owned by RCTC), and a part take in fee from VEJ Corona LP, for property sought for this project. These parcels were originally noticed for the Commission meeting of June 11, 2014, but have been moved to the July hearing. Other properties may be noticed for the July hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, wcz6v/11/4011-4_ Margar L. Barnes Senior itigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachments 17336.02100\8821742.1 -021 NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 9, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition an easement held by Corona Towne Center, LLC, including any and all possessory interests and any improvements in all that real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California and commonly known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024 (22217). The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02 l 00\8819853.1 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3), your failure to file a written request with RCTC to appear and be heard within 15 days from the date that this Notice is mailed may result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 9:30 a.m. PLACE OF HEARING: Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 DATED: May 27, 2014. BEST BEST IEGER LLP By: Mark A. Easter Artin N. Shaverdian Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\8819853.1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION AN EASEMENT HELD BY CORONA TOWNE CENTER, LLC, INCLUDING ANY AND ALL POSSESSORY INTERESTS AND ANY IMRPOVEMENTS IN ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCELS 1 AND 2, IN THE CITY OF CORONA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFONRIA, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP RECORDED JUNE 21, 1978 IN BOOK 51 PAGES 62 AND 63 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 w Parcel Number: 118270023.6 Map Book: 118 Page/Block: 270 Parcel: 23 Check Digit: 6 ra .10 GOLF PR 16 itnii'i4? fit r ® 1 r r rj att< " :471..L1' ASItaSX 2 MM 12 rN N PT HOW TO READ THE ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE The numerical parcel number on a map page consists of three main segments. The first three digits is the map book number. The second set of three numbers is the page/block number, and the third segment identifies the parcel number. POR CITY OF CTKVVq * Par Bli. 66 n ea HM.ap l67-63 Pokes/ flop 77.9 PN lAR7547-93 a 21690 r 401 641 rSL. ems:. A--�"1:37-47r*-- ac rka via ees. p 4%3,93 7racraaa0 MB9698 S69LM fia, Lad a lllaa Canada, PM 741 7,177 ®l dS EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 27, 2014, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owners and other interested parties of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 118-270-023 and 118-270-024 (CPN 22217): Corona Towne Center, LLC 4416 West 154t Street Lawndale, CA 90260 Record Owner Corona Towne Center, LLC 251-401 North Lincoln Avenue Corona, CA 92882 Record Owner Corona Towne Center, LLC 10410 South Vintage Avenue, Suite A Ontario, CA 91761 Record Owner Richard G. Greenberg, Esq. Greenberg, Whitcombe & Takeuchi, LLP 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 450 Torrance, CA 90503-6531 Courtesy Copy Michael H. Leifer, Esq. Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 Courtesy Copy Dated: May 27, 2014. Z5ed,„,,„ Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\8819853.1 7/9/2014 P oksrECT rhsrremaum THE COMMISSION IS REQUESTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. 1 7/9/2014 poJEcT 71 FISTFORWARO 1. Agins Development Corporation, a California corporation 2. Thrifty Oil Co., a California corporation pgo.itcr MST FORWARD N 2. Ownership Agins Development Corporation Thrifty Oil Co. Offer Date April 15, 2014 2 7/9/2014 91 ROJEC T iASFFPAWARP No. 2 Ownership Agins Development Corporation Thrifty Oil Co. In person Meetings Mailings Phone Contacts 15 E-Mails 15. *These numbers do not include contacts made with legal counsel, which in some cases has been extensive. Total 34 3 7/9/2014 4 7/9/2014 5 7/9/2014 FEE 51 SF -^-- PWFE (PERMANENT WALL F0)T1NG)i 37 SF """""""' TCE (TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION) 3,062 SF W SiXTH STREET OROJECT rAST FORWARD THE COMMISSION ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. 6 Indian Wells (760)568-2611 Irvine (949) 263-2600 Los Angeles (213)617-8100 Ontario (909) 989-8584 1111.11A. BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor, P.O. Box 1028, Riverside, CA 92502 Phone: (951) 686-1450 I Fax: (951) 686-3083 I www.bbklaw.com Margaret L. Barnes (951)826-8357 margaret.barnes@bbklaw.com File No. 17336.02100 June 9, 2014 VIA HAND DELIVERY Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 MECE[lWrg, JUN 21314 Sacramento (916) 325-4000 San Diego (619)525-1300 Walnut Creek (925)977-3300 Washington, DC (202) 785-0600 RIUERSID COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. Re: Notice of Hearing to Property Owner Thrifty Oil Co. (Assessor Parcel No. 102-290-001, CPNs 22166-1, 22166-2, 22166-3 and 22166-4) RCTC/SR91 CIP Project Ro N NO. 1 14 -0 Zy Dear Jennifer: Attached is the original Notice of Hearing to Property Owner, with proof of mailing, of the hearing on the adoption of resolutions of necessity scheduled for July 9, 2014, as to fee, permanent wall footing easement and temporary construction easement interests of Thrifty Oil Co. for property sought to be acquired for this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Attachment Very truly yours, z0-7‘,t-,ta Marg`et L. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 17336.02100\8830691.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPERTY OWNERS Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 9, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider adopting a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of real property interests in property that, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, County, California. The definition of the property rights to be acquired, together with the legal descriptions and corresponding depictions, are attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\8828282.1 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3), your failure to file a written request with RCTC to appear and be heard within 15 days from the date that this Notice is mailed may result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above -stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: May 30, 2014. Wednesday, July 9, 2014 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: Mark master Gregory G Snarr Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02100\8828282.1 Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission: (The rights being acquired may be exercised mutually exclusive of each other.) "Fee" (as to 22166-1) also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, grants to RCTC absolute ownership of the portion of the property to be acquired. "Permanent Wall Footing Easement," (as to 22166-2), grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a permanent easement to construct, maintain, operate repair, alter, replace, and remove footings, under, along and across the easement area, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating, repairing, renewing, or enlarging in any manner the footings together with any and all of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned. "Temporary Construction Easement (TCE)" refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project. As to 22166-3, such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. As to 22166-4, such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\8295546.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 PS OMAS 1 EXHIBIT `Al' 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22166-1 5 Fee .Acquisition 6 APN 102-290-001 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in. that certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 21, 1980 in it) Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the southwest corner of said land; thence North 09°27'42" East 6.00 feet 13 along the westerly line thereof to a point thereon; thence South 48°01'45" East 7.76 feet; 1.4 thence South 79°20'54" East 15.47 feet; thence South 10°39'06" West 1.50 feet to a point 15 on the southerly line of said land; thence North 80°33'41" West 2198 feet along said 16 southerly line to the Point of Beginning. 17 18 Containing 51 square feet. 19 20 This conveyance is made for the purpose of a :freeway and the Grantor hereby releases 21 and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights or access, appurtenant to 22 Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. 23 24 See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 25 26 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 27 System of 1.983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 28 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 29 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 30 31 MA2PTG010501\SURVEMEGALS\22166_APN_ 102-290-001V,egals;22166-1-Fee.doex Page 1 61'2 12/18/2013 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 PSOMAS Prepared raider the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 �z -/8-r3 Date MA2PTG010501`SURVEY\LPUALS\22166 API\_102-290-001\Legalsk22166-1-Fee.docx Page 2of2 12/18/2013 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-1 FEE THRIFTY OIL CO. 51 SQ. FT. 102-290-001 eN1 in // o // 102-290-012 1 1 o 102-270-010 / / ,0 L� V a, � N I o e- PARCEL 1 1 J r // ILA NO„ 0 J 05 — 4> /i i i`i3-r , i`�o , J �� // 7001 -�0 l 1 � 9'4 �// S80° 31 '55"E 1 4 7.52' A=06 53'25 -- _ o 1 R=343.00' `, L=41.25' / / BK.1980, PG.218368 O.R. _ o N J o FOR, PARCEL 102-290-004 �1 N o f1 ` 0 Tip' , YORJA TRACT � w M,S, 2/22 - FARD L 1 N' , R ., S. 4i/ 3 5 QN N �O •q- N al N- o O N o-) — ' O S48°01 '45"E 7.76' rn z S79°20'54"E 15.47' O o M _ - - S1 0° 39'06"W 1 .50' N T PROPOSED R/W 221 66-1 21.98' "W POB , N80°33'41 1 50.00' 7r M --------- — — --- --- — — — — — — — w_ 6TH —STREET --- — LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State I l 1 1 1 Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-1 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain FEE ACQUISITION ground distances. All .distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 �1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa (714)751n 7'373/(714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4. 3 1 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 1.2 13 14 15 1.6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT B1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans .Parcel No. 221.66-2 Permanent Wall Footing Easement APN 102-290-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 21, 1980 in Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said land; thence northerly along the general westerly line thereof the following two (2) courses: 1) North 09'27'42" East 109.02 feet to the beginning of a curve concave easterly having a radius of 343.00 feet and 2) along said curve 18.64 feet through a central angle of 03°06'48" to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said general westerly line and said curve 22.61 feet through a central angle of 03°46'36" to the northwest corner of said land; thence South 80°31'55" East 3.29 feet along the northerly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 360.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 65'32'47" West; thence southwesterly along said curve 23.13 feet through a central angle of 03°40'52" to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 37 square feet. See Exhibit `132' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983,.Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. M:\2PTG01050 \ SURVEY II,EGAI.S122166. APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-2-Esmt.docx Page 1 of 2 12/18/2013 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 PS OMAS Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date /2-ievf M:\2PTG010501\SURVEY\LE(iALS122166._.,APN__.102-290-001\Legals\22166-2-Esmt.doex Page 2 of 12/18/2013 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 6 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-2 ESMT THRIFTY OIL CO. 37 S0. FT. 102-290-001 iNi i // o 102-290-012 1 1 102-270-010 /� // z oEl- o N 1 o " I PARCEL J // 1 1 A NO, 0l-05 0 4> /// INST., NO, — 010 �JO 1 `,S0 I 1 J`� 7 `?(9- // O,R, O s9'' � �62 // // S80° 31 '55"E 1 4 7.52' , 0=06° 53'25" R=34 3.00' Z L=41.25' �;tit ��/ -022166-2) P o TPOB/ SEE SHEET 2 a _i 102-290-004 U a, N ON l O 1J�f�� 1Jr1f��r1 PARCEL J W N, TR, YORAA TRACT R ,, S , 4 /35 Q' (\I M�J1� J J J J (NIO � V Qcn Or BK.19809 PG.218368 O.R. N 0),—° O rn z o PROPOSED R/W (r) POB N80°33'41 "IN 50.00' ra We 6TH STREET .ii LEGEND (R) .Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning TPOB.. True Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State I l l i l Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-2 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. ' i FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 (714)751-7'373/(7114)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03/18/14 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4. 3 1 2 EXHIBIT B2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 221 66- 2 ESMT THRIFTY OIL CO. 37 SQ. FT. 102-290-001 -'i A=06°53'25" R=343.00' L=41 .25' PROPOSED L=22.61 i/l 1 ti, ,i'° J1`9s / 9 / '10,J 3. 29',/ / / / / / / 5° N6 p=03°40'52" R=360.00' L=23.13' /l 102-290-012 / PARCEL / L A NO, 1 NST 2001 32' 41"41 � S80° 31 '55"E 1 01 �-0S , NO, -6071 6 9 0. R, 1 47.52' — O.R. 102-270-010 p=03°46'36" R=343.00'� R=343.00' L=18.64' - / / / / / / / / N77°25'304(R) (R=343.00') RW / 221 66-2 / N69° 1 (R=360.00') TPOB 3'394(R) POR, PARCEL TR, YOR8A TRACT loll,8, 2./22 PG.218368 BK.1980, ' I w /7a 1 c�(3' I m o r o I z 1 1 LEGEND (R) Indicates POB Point of TPOB True Point Radial Bearing Beginning of Beginning State Prohibited ( ) Title to III I l Access NOTES 2 216 6 - 2 PERMANENT WALL FOOTING EASEMENT Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain graund distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. F FEET 0 30 5 10 20 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200Sant (714)751Ana, 7373/(714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4. 3 2 2 EXHIBI�A. PAGE 1. 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1.4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS EXHI:BIT `Cl.' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22166-3 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-290-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in th.at certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November. 21., 1980 in Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said land; thence northerly along the general westerly line thereof the following two (2) courses: 1) North 09°27'42" East 109.02 feet to the beginning of a curve concave easterly having a radius of 343.00 feet and 2) along said curve 4.22 feet through a central angle of 00°42'20" to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said general westerly line and said curve 14.41 feet through a central angle of 02°24'28" to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 360.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 69°1.3'39" West; thence northeasterly along said curve 23.13 feet through a central angle of 03°40'52" to a point on the northerly line of said land; thence South 80°31'55" East 4.14 feet along said northerly line to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 356.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears North 65°22'27" West; thence southwesterly along said curve 1.12 feet through a central angle of 00°10'49"; thence South 24°26'44" West 37.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 113 square feet. See Exhibit `C2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. M.12PTG010501\SURVEYILEGALS\22166_APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-3-TCE.docx Page 1 of 12/18/2013 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9 PS oMAs The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1.983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of th.e courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. Prepared under the direction of Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date /8 -•& MA2PTG010501\SURVEYNsLEGAL S\22166_ APN.._102.290-00 PLegals\22166-3-TCE.docx Page 2 of 2 12/1.8/201.3 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-3 TCE THRIFTY OIL CO. 113 SQ. FT. 102-290-001 iN � // o 102-290-012 1 1 o 102-270-010 /� // rJCr ;L�) L>, , o i\ N o " I 1 PARCEL J 1 J 1 J -. // L L A NO, 01 �- 05 ti� // J i\JST >`JJ — _ �° // 200 1 �-�0 l 1 �d-s // C,R„ 9,, // 6P /r " I, // S80° 31 '55"E 1 47.52' , 0=06° 53'25" R=34 3.00' L=41.25' jJ I — o < 221 66- 3) 1 �: TPOB / SEE SHEET 2 1 N.o 0 102-290-004 U N o O. w POR, PARCEL 3 in PARCEL 1 N` TR YORSA TRACT R , S , '; /35 vo M,8� 2/22 cv ti v 0 0 BK.1980, PG.218368 O.R. v �� ° o rn z o PROPOSED R/W cr) POB N80°33'41 "W 1 50.00' v r) --------- -- — — — Wa 6 TH-- STREET — — — -- LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing P08 Point of Beginning TPOB True Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State I I i l l Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-3 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I �1 FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS Hutton SontaAno, Califorrnia 200 92707 (714)751-7373/(7141545-8883 (Fox) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA: OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4.3 1 2 EXHIBIT C2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-3 TCE THRIFTY OIL CO. 113 SQ. FT. 102-290-001 / / / / 102-290-012 ,� / / PARBEL l 'i,> / LLA ND, o l -J5 102-270-010 4.) �° A� ) Ns7 NJ �c9s // ,a' 2JJ 1 --t4)J71 69 9!^ y /04) / J,R, (-�J ,(0 / .. 4.14' / �..�Airr S80°31'55"E 147.52' 1\165°22"27"W(R) �=00° 10'4g„ R=356.00' L=1.1 A=03°40'52" 0 2 A=06° 53'25" R=360.00' I L=23.1.3' R=343.00' L=41 .25' „�� P 221 66- 3) N77025,304 R (R=343.0(y) n, N69° -il 0=02°24'28" R=343.00' - L=1 4.41 ' N79°49'58W R PROPOSED RW 1 3'39"w(R) (R=360.00') PoR , pARc L 3 TR, YoRBA TRADT loll , S , 2/22 BK.1980, PG.21 8368 O.R. 114Lp0B 0=00° 4 2 '20" R=343.00' w L=4.22" LEGEND �N (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning TPOB True Point of Beginning � o c\1c rn O o ( ) Title to State ) ) ) t Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-3 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 5 10 20 30 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santo Ana, California 92707 (714)751-7373/(714)545-8883 (Fax) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 R I V 91 4.1 2 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PS OMAS EXHIBIT `Dl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22166-4 Temporary Construction Easement APN 102-290-001 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 21, 1980 in Book 1980, Page 218368 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said land; thence South 80°33'41" East 21.98 feet along the southerly line thereof to a point thereon, said point being the True Point Beginning; thence North 10°39'06" East 1.50 feet; thence North 79°20'54""West 15.47 feet; thence North 48°01'45" West 7.76 feet to a point on the westerly line of said land, said point lying North 09°27'42" East 6.00 feet from said southwesterly corner; thence North 09°27'42" East 14.00 feet along said westerly line; thence South 80°33'41" East 150.00 feet to a point on the easterly line of said land; thence South 09°27'42" West 20.00 feet along said easterly line to the southeasterly corner of said land; thence North 80°33'41" West 128.02 feet along the southerly line of said land to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 2,949 square feet. See Exhibit `A2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. MA2PTG0105011SURVEYTEGALS\22166_APN__102-290-001\LegatsV2166-4-TCE.docx Page 1 of 2 12/18/2013 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13 1 2 3 4 PS • MAS Prepared under the direction of <.� ere, 5 Brian B. Bullock, PLS 5260 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 (2-/cF-i3 Date MA2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22166__APN_102-290-001\Legals\22166-4-TCE.docx Page 2 of 12118/2013 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 EXHIBIT D2 PARCEL# TITLE GRANTOR AREA APN 22166-4 TCE THRIFTY OIL CO. 2,949 SO. FT. 102-290-001 ��� // o 102-290-012 1 02-270-010 // / ' � N o r- // I_L A NO, 01 -05 `' /� 1 NST , NO , ti, 1 �� // 7001 -60-11 �9 J,R„ \ �S9,, � / / AJi'�/ S80°31'55"E 147.52' o I 0=06° 53'25" � R=34 3.00' / L=41.25' BK.19809 PG.218368 O.R. _ PJt� PARCEL 0 102-290-004 _1 `l, o cv 0 -ft� YJi��r� TiiAI;7 PARCEL 2/22 N R , S , 4; /735 o PROPOSED R/W vr 0 0 22166-4� c\, m-- 0 ° z N48°01'45"W 7.76' 00 o , - S80°33'41 "E 1 50.00' N v ppP- N79°20'54"W 15.47' 6.00' ��_ N10°39'06"E 1.50' 20.00' 128.02' POB 4, 21.98' N80°33'41 "W 1 50.00' TPOB � 'r,-) --— - — - — -- —--- - -- --- ----- ----- - W. 6 TH -STREET _- LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning ( ) Title to State I I I I I Access Prohibited NOTES 22166-4 Coordinates and bearings are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ground distances. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. I FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa7141751-7373/(7114)5459 2707 (8883 (Fox) DATE: 06-28-12 REV.2: 03-18-14 EA OF540 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 4.3 1 1 LAI-11011 A, h'Mit PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on May 30, 2014, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first- class mail to the following owner of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 102-290-001 (CPN 22166-1, 22166-2, 22166-3 and 22166-4): Thrifty Oil Co. Record Owner 1735 6th Street Corona, CA 92882 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. Record Owner 13116 Imperial Highway Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Thrifty Oil Co. Record Owner 13116 Imperial Highway Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Thrifty Oil Co. Record Owner 10000 Lakewood Boulevard Downey, CA 92040 Dated: May 30, 2014. argaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\8828282.1 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Transit Services Funding Allocation for Fiscal Year 2014/15 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2014/15 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2014/15 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 14-023, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its June 11 meeting, the Commission approved in concept the FYs 2014/15 — 2016/17 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; the Commission's Commuter Rail Program; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine). Through the annual SRTP process, a series of service changes and capital program additions are recommended, designed to increase ridership and aimed at improving service delivery and meeting identified unmet needs over a three-year time frame. The core elements of each agency's SRTP include the operating plan, capital program, and accompanying financial plans. These elements provide the basis for the Commission's oversight activities - to ensure compliance with federal regulations, the Transportation Development Act (TDA), state law, and Commission -adopted guidelines and policies. Throughout the development and execution of the SRTPs, the Commission maintains its immediate focus by providing an integrated network of transit services convenient for county residents. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality, safety, and cost effectiveness of Agenda Item 7 33 the transit system, sustain on -going service coordination efforts with other regional transit operators, and maximize ridership potential in all public transportation modes — fixed routes, demand -response, and rail. In January 2014, the Commission received information on the FY 2014/15 revenue projections, indicating an increase of approximately 13 percent in both LTF and Measure A funding compared to the FY 2013/14 original estimates. The California State Controller's office also released the STA preliminary allocation estimates for the region for FY 2014/15, indicating a nearly 3 percent increase compared to last year's estimate. The region's share of STA allocation provide a four-year continuation of STA funding for transit since the temporary allocation freeze five years ago. At its September 30, 2013 meeting, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Executive Committee approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Commission and CVAG to establish a funding split for Coachella Valley TDA funds. The intent is to allocate up, to 10 percent of the TDA funds (LTF and STA) currently apportioned to Coachella Valley, using a phased -in approach, to support the Coachella Valley rail program. This year's funding allocation includes a set aside of 5 percent of TDA funds into the Coachella Valley rail fund to cover operating expenses related to technical work for the development of the Los Angeles to Coachella Valley corridor in the state rail plan. The funding split is to be phased in as follows: FY 2014/15 (5 percent), FY 2015/16 (7 percent), and FY 2016/17 and thereafter (10 percent). The MOU demonstrates, Coachella Valley's commitment toward implementing a robust rail program by using federal and state funding sources and other support for necessary environmental work, as well as future operations funding to support the rail program in the valley. SunLine is the only designated public transit operator in the Coachella Valley currently authorized by the state to receive these funds. SRTP Financial and Ridership Overview Approximately $213.9 million in total funding is required to support the operating and capital requests for the provision of Riverside County transit services. The following table provides an overview of the total operating and capital costs together with projected ridership levels by apportionment area. Agenda Item 7 34 • • • FY 2014/15 Operating, Capital and Ridership Projections Expense Type Western Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Bus i Rail Bus i Rail Operating Capital $ 76,358,794 36,882,206 ' $ 23,612,050 $ 28,044,924 10,057,417 1 $ 779,531 $ 937,289 442,624 $ 129,732,588 47,382,247 Total (Operating & Capital) i i $ 113,241,000 $ 23,612,050 4 i $ 38,102,341 i $ 779,531 $ 1,379,913 $ 177,114,835 Leverage of Commuter Rail Funds* i i $ 36,816,000 i i $ 36,816,000 GRAND TOTAL I $ 113,241,000I $ 60,428,050 I $ 38,102,341I $ 779,531 $ 1,379,913 $ 213,930,835 FY 2014/15 Projected Ridership 10,700,815 3,638,724 5,217,902 0 46,043 19,603,484 * LA Metro, OCTA & SANBAG's share and passenger fare revenues for Commuter Rail expenses The ridership estimate for FY 2013/14 indicates an all-time ridership record of about 18.4 million passengers in Riverside County, an increase of more than 3 percent over FY 2012/13. Likewise, the funding plan for FY 2014/15 as shown in Attachment 4 is projected to generate 19.6 million in ridership, 6.5 percent higher than the forecast for FY 2013/14. Funding levels for next year's transit operations reflect a systemwide increase of 11 percent in total operating expenses and a substantial increase of 71 percent in capital expenditures. Capital funds programmed in FY 2014/15 are higher than last year due to expenditures for planned procurements of several new buses for service expansion as well as replacement. FY 2014/15 Operating and Capital Costs To implement the SRTPs for FY 2014/15, the request is to utilize approximately $130 million for operating and $47 million for capital in addition to the $36.8 million share from Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to leverage the Commuter Rail Program. The chart below provides an overview of the operating and capital costs by funding source required to support the county's transit operations. Agenda Item 7 35 Riverside County: FY 2014/15 Operating and Capital Costs ■ TDA{LTF & STA Funds}, $99,766,028 , 47% Carryover Funds(LTF/SiA/5307/S $8,523,720, 4% • Add1 Rail Operating Subsidy paid bySAPBAG,OCFA& lA ,e Other Revenues, 52J/54,573 Metro, $20,323,000 , U ,1% Approximately $70.2 million (33 percent) of the $213.9 million total operating and capital costs identified in the chart is funded by the following sources: M Measure A, $8,807)05,4% ® Federal Formula Funds {Sec 5307, 5311, 5310, 533E and CMACO, $33,709,643 ,16% • Prop 18 (Cap+Security), $478,402, 0% Sec5316 & 5317, $1,00E6492 ,0% it Passenger Fares, $39,272,152,18% • $39.3 million - Passenger fares • $20.3 million - Commuter rail member agencies' revenue share • $ 8.5 million - Carryover funds — LTF, STA, 5307, 5309 • $ 2.1 million - Miscellaneous other revenues (bus shelter advertising, general fund contributions, compressed natural gas sales, Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits, Southern California Regional Rail Authority pass -through funds for security guards, pass - through funds from 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Assistance funds for the Perris Multimodal Transit Center, vending machine revenues, taxi voucher sales, federal excise credit, and interest income) The remaining balance of approximately $143.7 million (67 percent) consists of federal, state, and local funds, including Proposition 1B funds that are primarily allocated through Commission action. Transportation Development Act Funding TDA is one of the major funding sources for public transit in California and provides two funding sources — LTF and STA for transit capital, operations, and planning. Agenda Item 7 • 36 • The LTF funds are derived from a quarter cent of the statewide general sales tax collected in each county. The State Board of Equalization returns the sales tax revenues to the county of Riverside where it is held until the Commission provides written allocation instructions for disbursement. It is estimated that LTF revenue for transit services for FY 2014/15 will be $76,030,115 reflecting a 12 percent increase compared to the original projected amount for FY 2013/14, and is consistent with the revenue projection provided at the January 2014 Commission meeting. STA funding is derived from sales tax on diesel fuel. Fifty percent of STA funds are allocated according to population and the other 50 percent is allocated according to the ratio of fare revenues generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. For Riverside County, there is approximately $39.8 million in STA unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2013/14. Additional revenues of $11.7 million are anticipated in FY 2014/15 for a total available amount of $51.5 million. About $13.5 million of this fund balance will be utilized by county transit operators for various capital projects in FY 2014/15. In March 2010, the Commission adopted a revised policy requiring all operators to spend down existing capital balances prior to requesting additional funds. As a result, the current level of STA fund balance has gradually improved since the resumption of STA funding after a temporary freeze five years ago. The fund reserve will continue to sustain current and future capital needs of county operators while also serving as a cushion in the event of another wave of economic recession. Prior to approving STA allocations, the Commission must adopt the attached resolution as specified in the TDA statutes and California Code of Regulations. For public transit operators to claim LTF and/or STA funds, the Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in the FY 2014/15 SRTPs. The requested allocations need to be consistent with the approved SRTPs, and the funds are explicitly for the projects stated in the approved plans. Attachment 2 outlines the TDA allocations for FY 2014/15 requested by each operator. Measure A Funding Another primary source of funding for transit comes from 2009 Measure A — the half -cent sales tax transportation initiative in Riverside County. Measure A funds for transit programs in Western County and Coachella Valley provide funding support for specialized transit, intercity bus services, and commuter rail. About 4 percent of the FY 2014/15 proposed operating and capital expenditures will be covered by Measure A funds. Measure A spending plan for public transit is outlined below. Agenda Item 7 37 Measure A Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 2,956,825 Sun Line 5,846,000 Total $ 8,802,825 Proposition 16 Funding Proposition 1B bond proceeds fund various transportation programs, including the Proposition 1B Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) program administered by Caltrans and the California Transit Security Grant Program managed by the California Emergency Management Agency. PTMISEA funds are distributed through the STA formula and can fund new replacement equipment, system rehabilitation, capital service improvements or expansion, and bus rapid transit but not operating costs. Projects eligible under the Proposition 1B security program include capital projects to protect against security threats or develop a disaster response plan for transit. Each region is guaranteed a share of the Proposition 1B formula funds, however, these funds are distributed as bonds are sold. Annual appropriation in the state budget is expected to be spread across several fiscal years. Riverside County was appropriated approximately $1.8 million in Proposition 1B security funds for FY 2013/14. About $44.6 million in Proposition 1B capital funding was also appropriated to the region to cover a three-year spending plan for FY 2010/11 — FY 2012/13, all of which have been programmed during the last two years for various capital projects. The Proposition 1B program does not require agencies to provide matching funds. For FY 2014/15, only Proposition 1B security funds were programmed by agencies as follows: Agency City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Riverside SunLine PVVTA Total FY 2014/15 Federal Funds Section 5307 Formula Funds Proposition 16 Capital Security $ $ 19,189 18,724 48,451 372,417 19,621 478,402 FTA's Section 5307 formula funds are appropriated annually by Congress and distributed to regions per an urbanized area formula based upon population served and the amount of transit service provided. This funding provides transit capital and operating assistance to urbanized Agenda Item 7 38 • • • areas with a population of 50,000 or more. Under Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21sY Century (MAP-21), this program allows up to 85 percent federal share for ADA compliant vehicles for paratransit service. Riverside County consists of four urbanized areas (UZA), namely: • Riverside/San Bernardino; • Hemet/San Jacinto; • Temecula/Murrieta; and • Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs. In addition, Riverside County also receives a small share of the Los Angeles/Long Beach/Anaheim UZA apportionment for regional transit connection it provides to this UZA. The Commission must develop and approve a POP for each UZA and conduct a public hearing prior to an operator submitting its Section 5307 grant application to FTA. If the draft POP is not amended through the public hearing process, the POP will become final as presented and will be included in an approved FTIP, which is subsequently forwarded to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for review and processing. Attachment 3 shows the proposed Section 5307 POP for Riverside County. Section 5307 funds requested by operator are shown below: FY 2014/15 Section 5307 Requested Funds Agency Amount City of Riverside $ 329,600 RTA 18,976,890 SunLine 4,632,000 Total $ 23,938,490 The actual Section 5307 apportionments for FY 2014/15 will not be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by Congress. The POP was developed at the highest anticipated funding amount based on actual available apportionments for FY 2013/14 to allow the operators to proceed with the grant applications and avoid delays associated with program amendments should the actual apportionments come in lower than estimated. Any excess funds will be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year and will be made available to cover future projects. Section 5310 Funds The Federal Section 5310 program provides annual grants to purchase transit capital equipment to improve mobility for elderly and disabled individuals for whom mass transportation services are unavailable, insufficient, or inappropriate. The program serves a variety of client groups, mostly non-profit organizations, but public agencies are also eligible recipients where non-profit organizations are not readily available to provide the specialized service. Eligible Agenda Item 7 39 equipment, for Section 5310 funding includes accessible vans and buses, mobile radios and communications equipment as well as computer hardware and software. The program is administered by Caltrans and projects selected for funding must be derived from the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan. SunLine identified the use of Section 5310 funding to procure two medium-sized CNG vehicles for its paratransit service. FY 2014/15 Section 5310 Requested Funds Agency Amount SunLine Total Section 5311 Funds 210,000 210,000 The Federal Section 5311 transit funding provides formula funds to rural or non -urbanized areas in the state. The program is administered by Caltrans, and the majority of these funds are passed through to counties based on population formula. Remaining funds are awarded in a statewide discretionary program for rural capital projects and intercity bus programs. The Commission must develop and approve a Section 5311 POP before grants are approved. This year's program allocates $879,687 in formula funds for Riverside County, and, as in previous years, both RTA and SunLine identified the use of Section 5311 formula funds for operating purposes. FY 2014/15 Section 5311 Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 450,000 SunLine 429,687 Total $ 879,687 Section 5316 and 5317 Formula Funds Federal programs Section 5316 —Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and Section 5317 — New Freedom were established to meet the transportation needs of the low-income individuals, welfare recipients, and persons with disabilities. Projects funded under this program must be contained in the locally -developed Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan. Under the 2013 Specialized Transit Universal Call for Projects (2013 Call for Projects), RTA, SunLine, and PVVTA were awarded federal JARC and New Freedom funds to cover expenses for RTA's Commuter Link 212 and 217, extended fixed route services, and travel training; SunLine's new North Shore fixed route; and PVVTA's mobility management program. Funds made available through the 2013 Call for Projects are fund balances from the previous federal authorization referred to as SAFETEA-LU and will be disbursed and administered under the previous guidelines. Funding allotments programmed in FY 2014/15 are as follows: Agenda Item 7 40 • • Agency Section 5316 (JARC) Section 5317 (New Freedom) RTA $ 586,579 $ 308,066 SunLine 32,928 65,709 PVVTA 7,210 Total $ 619,507 $ 380,985 Section 5339 Funds The FTA Section 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities) program is a new formula grant program under MAP-21, replacing the previous Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facilities discretionary program. The program provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses/vans and related equipment and to construct bus -related facilities. Section 5339 funds can also be used for introducing new technology and safety and security items for transit systems. FTA apportions funds to urban areas by population and service factors, and the federal share may not exceed 80 percent of the cost of the project. This year's program allocates about $2.5 million in formula funds for both RTA and SunLine. FY 2014/15 Section 5339 Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 1,580,162 SunLine 913,804 Total $ 2,493,966 CMAQ Funds The CMAQ program helps fund regional and local efforts to attain compliance with national air quality standards set under the Clean Air Act. These funds are largely spent on transportation control measures such as improving public transit service, traffic flow improvements, trip reduction, and other ridesharing initiatives primarily aimed at reducing air pollution emissions. Eligible activities include transit improvements, travel demand management strategies, traffic flow improvements, and public fleet conversion to cleaner fuels. These funds are distributed by SCAG to regions which conduct the project selection process according to the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Regional Transportation Plan priorities. Funds can be used for both capital and operating assistance, and the federal share of CMAQ-eligible projects is 80 percent. FY 2014/15 Section CMAQ Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 6,037,500 SunLine 150,000 Total $ 6,187,500 Agenda Item 7 41 Summary Staff recommendation is to approve the TDA and FTA funds as presented. If any additional funding revenue becomes available during the budget year, transit operators will prepare the necessary SRTP amendments, as appropriate, to identify new or expanded services and capital projects. Modifications in farebox revenues, federal grants, Measure A funding, or carryover funds may require operators to revise their services to operate within the funding limit available. Fiscal Impact Funding allocations are based on the revenue estimates developed for the FY 2014/15 Commission budget. The budget adopted at the June 11 Commission meeting included $72.9 million in LTF transit operating expenditures, $8.6 million in LTF transit capital expenditures, and $27.7 million in STA capital expenditures. These budgeted expenditures, which include use of prior year capital allocations, are expected to be funded by FY 2014/15 revenues, as well as available fund balances. Based on these recommended allocations, a budget adjustment of $5,425600 is required. Federal funds for transit operations and capital do not pass through the Commission and are therefore not included in the Commission's budget. Agenda Item 7 42 • • • Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes No Yes Year: FY 2014/15 Amount: $80,846,428 (LTF) $5,425,589 (LTF) $13,494,011 (STA) Source of Funds: TDA: LTF and STA Budget Adjustment: No Yes* No GLANo.: LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE Western County Bus Western County Bus 601 62 86101 P2210 $ 46,854,458 601 62 86102 P2210 $ 12,519,558, including budget adjustment of $4,519,558* Western County Rail 241 62 86102 P2201 $7,792,132 241 62 86102 P2204 $ 0 Coachella Valley Bus 241 62 86102 P2202 $ 5,287,876 Coachella Valley Rail 601 62 86101 P2213 $11,778,100, including budget adjustment of $242,500* Coachella Valley Bus 241 62 86101 P2202 $116,000 Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2211 $ 13,506,121 Coachella Valley Rail 241 62 86102 P2203 $ 298,003 601 62 86101 P2211 $ 663,531, including budget adjustment of $663,531* Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2212 $ 825,249 601 62 86102 P2212 $ 125,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \1414444evi, Date: 06/13/14 Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 14-023 2) TDA Spreadsheets (STA and LTF) 3) Section 5307 Program of Projects 4) FY 2014/15 and FY 2013/14 Operating and Capital Requests and Ridership Projections Agenda Item 7 43 • • ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 14-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is designated the regional entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has examined the Short Range Transit Plans and Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to meet the fare revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Federal Transit Act; and WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit assistance fund and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide public transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 99244; and WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers or persons operating under a franchise or license; and WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance with Section 18081.1 of the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251. 44 ATTACHMENT NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 2014/15 as detailed in Attachment 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of July, 2014. Marion Ashley, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 45 ATTACHMENT Page 1 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2014/16 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED NON RECOMMENDED LTF OPERATING LTF CAPITAL LTF TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS TOTAL COSTS LTF REVENUES FOR FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Corona Riverside Special Services Riverside Transit Agency $ 1,626,566 2,200,000 2,235,422 3,323,825 66,972,981 $ 19,189 1,361,399 1,085,000 60,451 34,356,167 $ 1,645,755 3,561,399 3,320,422 3,384,276 101,329,148 $ 188,689 1,581,399 1,532,087 755,219 49,809,590 $ 1,457,066 1,980,000 1,788,335 2,629,057 51,519,558 $ 1,457,066 1,980,000 1,788,335 2,629,057 39,000,000 $ - - - 12,519,558 TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS 76,358,794 36,882,206 113,241,000 53,866,984 59,374,016 46,854,458 12,519,558 RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) 23,612,050 - 23,612,050 11,833,950 11,778,100 11,778,100 - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - RAIL* 23,612,050 - 23,612,050 11,833,950 11,778,100 11,778,100 - SunLine Transit Agency 28,044,924 10,057,417 38,102,341 24,596,220 13,506,121 13,506,121 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY - BUS 28,044,924 10,057,417 38,102,341 24,596,220 13,506,121 13,506,121 - RCTC's Rail (Coachella) 779,531 - 779,531 116,000 663,531 663,531 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY - RAIL* 779,531 - 779,531 116,000 663,531 663,531 - Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 937,289 442,624 1,379,913 429,664 950,249 825,249 125,000 ITOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY 937,289 442,624 1,379,913 429,664 950,249 825,249 125,000 COUNTYWIDE TOTAL $ 129,732,588 $ 47,382,247 $ 177,114,835 $ 90,842,818 $ 86,272,017 $ 73,627,459 $12,644,558 * Commuter Rail's operating costs are estimated at $61.2 million per Table 4 of SRTP. Of this amount, $24.4 million is RCTC's share of operating costs. • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2014/15 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS • ATTACHMENT Page 2 of 2 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA RECOMMENDED STA STA Operating STA Capital ESTIMATED STA CARRY OVER TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS FUNDS FOR FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Corona Riverside Special Services Riverside Transit Agency $ - $ - $ 1,342,675 - 1,005,000 - 2,400 - 5,442,057 - $ - 1,342,675 - 1,005,000 - 2,400 - 5,442,057 $ - $ - 1,342,675 - 1,005,000 - 2,400 5,442,057 TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS - 7,792,132 - 7,792,132 _ 7,792,132 RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) - - - - - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - RAIL - _ _ - _ _ SunLine Transit Agency - 5,287,876 - 5,287,876 - 5,287,876 TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY -BUS - 5,287,876 - 5,287,876 - 5,287876 RCTC's Rail (Coachella) 116,000 - 116,000 116,000 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY -RAIL 116,000 - 116,000 116,000 - Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency - 298,003 - 298,003 - 298,003 TOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY - 298,003 - 298,003 - 298,003 COUNTYWIDE TOTAL $ 116,000 $13,378,011 $ - $ 13,494,011 $ 116,000 $13,378,011 47 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2014/15 URBANIZED AREA: RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY13/14 Fed Register & Inter -county Allocation) Bus Rail Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover (Estimate) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) Sub Area Allocation Riverside, City of Riverside Transit Agency NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS Riverside, City of 1) Preventive Maintenance 2) Lease of Office Equipment Total $ 11,453,930 $ 5,825,448 $ 17,279,378 17,433,894 23,259,342 9,281,146 20,735,076 11,648,853 26,715,040 43,994,418 11,648,853 $ 9,086,223 $ 23,259,342 $ 32,345,565 $ 329,600 11,319,253 TOTAL $ 11,648,853 TOTAL FEDERAL AMOUNT SHARE $ 400,000 12,000 ATTACHMENT Page 1 of 5 PROJECT DESIGNATED TYPE RECIPIENT $ 320,000 Capital/Operating 9,600 Capital TOTAL: City of Riverside $ 412,000 $ 329,600 Riverside Transit Agency 3) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $ 6,250,000 $ 2,844,322 4) Capital Cost of Contracting 6,750,000 2,800,000 5) Replacement Revenue Vehicles - (26) DAR 1,886,870 1,603,840 6) Expansion Revenue Vehicles - (10) DAR 839,950 713,957 7) Fareboxes - DO & CO 3,396,600 2,717,280 8) Facility Maintenance 332,618 266,094 9) Information Systems - ITS 467,200 373,760 TOTAL: Riverside Transit Agency $ 19,923,238 $ 11,319,253 GRAND TOTAL $ 20,335,238 $ 11,648,853 Updated: 6/23/2014 Approved: 7/09/2014 (pending) Capital/Operating Capital/Operating Capital Capital Capital Capital Capital SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG 48 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2014/15 URBANIZED AREA: HEMET/SAN JACINTO RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY 13/14 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment $ 3,146,996 Carryover (estimate) 3,857,477 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) - Total Funds Available 7,004,473 Less Current Requests 3,912,844 Balance (Projected) $ 3,091,629 NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS ATTACHMENT Page 2 of 5 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 38,532,071 $ 1,800,000 Operating Caltrans 2) Replacement Revenue Vehicles (12) 2,438,640 2,072,844 Capital Caltrans 3) Associated Transittmprovements 150,000 40,000 Capital Caltrans TOTAL: $ 41,120,711 $ 3,912,844 Updated: 6/23/2014 Approved: 7/09/14 (pending) V:\JClemente\SRTP 14.15\POP FY 1415\POP\Hemet - San JacintoUZA14-15 p2 • 49 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2014/15 URBANIZED AREA: INDIO/CATHEDRAL CITY/PALM SPRINGS RECIPIENT: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY 13/14 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment $ 4,330,378 Carryover (Estimate) 3,960,004 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available 8,290,382 Less Current Requests 4,632,000 Balance (Projected) $ 3,658,382 NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS ATTACHMENT 3 Page 3of5 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 28,044,924 $ 3,000,000 Operating SCAG 2) 4 Paratransit Vans (2 new & 2 replacements) 440,000 142,000.00 Capital SCAG 3) Transit Enhancements (25 bus shelters) 312,417 100,000.00 Capital SCAG 4) 4 Service Vehicles (2 new & 2 replacements) 170,000 130,000.00 Capital SCAG 5) Replacement Bus Lifts for Thousand Palms 400,000 320,000.00 Capital SCAG 6) Replacement Bus Fleet (6) 3,300,000 300,000.00 Capital SCAG 7) New Asset Management Tool 500,000 400,000.00 Capital SCAG 8) Master Plan Update 100,000 80,000.00 Capital SCAG 9) Thousand Palms Site Development 200,000 160,000.00 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $ 33,467,341 $ 4,632,000 Updated: 6/23/2014 Approved: 7/09/2014 (pending) V:\JClemente\SRTP 14.15\POP FY 1415\POP\Indio-Coachella-P Springs 14-15 p3 50 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 4 of 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2014/15 URBANIZED AREA: TEMECULA/MURRIETA RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY 13/14 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS $ 4,536,138 2,728,366 7,264,504 3,589,115 $ 3,675,389 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Capital Cost of Contracting $ 6,750,000 $ 2,600,000 Capital/Operating SCAG Support Vehicles/Trucks for 2) Replacement (19) 735,480 588,384 Capital SCAG 3) Associated Transit Improvements 150,000 80,000 Capital SCAG 4) Capitalized Tire Lease 302,099 241,679 Capital SCAG 5) Maintenance/Support Equipment 98,815 79,052 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $ 8,036,394 $ 3,589,115 Updated: 6/23/2014 Approved: 7/09/14 (pending) V:\JClemente\SRTP 14.151POP FY 1415\POP\Temecula-Murrieta14-15 p4 • 51 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2014/15 URBANIZED AREA: LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH-ANAHEIM RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Estimate based on FY 13/14 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment $ 30,159 Carryover 125,519 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) - Total Funds Available 155,678 Less Current Requests 155,678 Balance (Projected) $ NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS ATTACHMENT 3 Page 5 of 5 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $ 6,250,000 $ 155,678 Capital/operating SCAG TOTAL: $ 6,250,000 $ 155,678 Updated: 6/23/2014 Approved: 7/09/14 (pending) V:\JClemente\SRTP 14.15\POP FY 1415\POP\LA-LB-Anaheim14-15 p5 52 • • Comparison of FY 2014/15 & FY 2013/14 Operating & Capital Costs and Ridership Projections • ATTACHMENT OPERATING CAPITAL TOTAL COST RIDERSHIP AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA FY14/15 FY13/14 % Incr/Decr FY14/15 FY13/14 % Incr/Decr FY14/15 FY13/14 % Incr/Decr FY 14/15 (Projection) FY 13/14 Estimate iicrioecr City of Banning $ 1,626,566 $ 1,293,675 25.73% $ 19,189 $ 527,640.00 -96.36% $ 1,645,755 $ 1,821,315 -9.64% 237,270 155,495 52.59% City of Beaumont 2,200,000 1,965,410 11.94% 1,361,399 840,889 61.90% 3,561,399 2,806,299 26.91% 209,495 215,829 -2.93% City of Corona 2,235,422 2,108,647 6.01% 1,085,000 1,341,375 -19.11% 3,320,422 3,450,022 -3.76% 241,082 238,696 i 00% Riverside Special Services 3,323,825 3,395,960 -2.12% 60,451 116,014 -47.89% 3,384,276 3,511,974 -3.64% 186,000 184,187 0.98r Riverside Transit Agency 66,972,981 61,181,842 9.47% 34,356,167 17,659,924 94.54% 101,329,148 78,841,766 28.52% 9,826,968 9,509,504 3.34% Western County: Bus 76,358,794 69,945,534 9.17% 36,882,206 20,485,842 80.04% 113,241,000 90,431,376 25.22% 10,700,815 10,303,711 385% Western County: Rail* 23,612,050 21,234,200 11.20% 355,748 -100.00% 23,612,050 21,589,948 9.37% 3,638,724 3,273,829 11 15% WESTERN COUNTY: TOTAL (Bus & Rail) 99,970,844 91,179,734 9.64% 36,882,206 20,841,590 76.96% 136,853,050 112,021,324 22.17% 14,339,539 13,577,540 5.61% SunLine Transit Agency (Bus) 28,044,924 24,950,824 12.40% 10,057,417 6,526,870 54.09% 38,102,341 31,477,694 21.05% 5,217,902 4,784,121 9.07% Coachella Valley (Rail)* 779,531 779,531 o o COACHELLA VALLEY: TOTAL (Bus & Rail) 28,824,455 24,950,824 15.53% 10,057,417 6,526,870 54.09% 38,881,872 31,477,694 23.52% 5,217,902 4,784,121 907% Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 937,289 913,416 2.61% 442,624 350,569 26.26% 1,379,913 1,263,985 9.17% 46,043 45,140 200% PALO VERDE VALLEY: TOTAL 937,289 913,416 2.61% 442,624 350,569 26.26% 1,379,913 1,263,985 9.17% 46,043 45,140 2.00% TOTAL: ALL AREAS $ 129,732,588 $ 117,043,974 10.84% $ 47,382,247 $ 27,719,029 70.94% $ 177,114,835 $ 144,763,003 22.35% 19,603,484 18,406,801 6.50% Leverage of Commuter Rail Funds* FY 14/15 FY 13/14 % Incr/Decr $ 36,816,000 $ 36,816,000 0.00% Total: $ 213,930,835 $ 181,579,003 17.82% *Commuter Rail's costs include RCTC's share of approximately $24.4 million plus approximately $36.8 million In additional operating subsidy from partner agencies ($20,323,000) and Rail farebox revenue ($16,493,000). Note: FY 2014/15 total cost includes $8,523,720 in LTF/STA/5307/5309 carryover funds from prior year. 53 FY 2014/15 Funding Allocation for Riverside County Transit Services Riverside Transit Agency 5unLine Transit. Agency Palo Verde valley Transit Agency RCTC Rail Program [WR & CV (new)] 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FY 2014/15 TRANSIT FUNDING REQUEST ilalr IS hoolow bsr• ' input f $177 (million) 73%- Operating 27%- Capital Commuter Rail Program Share From Metrolink Partners FY 2014/15 TOTAL FUNDING SUPPORT FOR TRANSIT FY 2013/14 and FY 2014/15 OPERATING & CAPITAL COST ecrc 2 FY>1r4/15 TRANSIT FINANCIAL PLAN BY REVENUE SOURCE ■ TDA(LTF&STA Funds(, $99,766,028 , 47% ■ Carryover Funds(LTF/5TA/5307/53 $8,523,720, 4% • Addl Rail Operating5u6sidy paid 6y5ANBAG, OCTA & LA Metro, $20,323,000, 10% • Other Revenues, $2,054,573 , 1% ■ Measure A, $8,802,825, 4%3 Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5307, 5311, 5310, 5339 and CMAO), $33,709,643 , 16% • prop lB (CapiSearily(, $478,402, 0% j • Sec 5316 & 5317, $1,000,492 Passenger Fares, $39,272,152, 18% Y•h Approve the FY 201.4and STA fu d allocations transit; Adopt Resolution No 14 023, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate e Transit Ass` tonce Funds' O emy4 ,.,.. met r► moils no woo mo As sis i'cr ow urmirraiae y-sa_ Cam} IA Me .•041108 Mk FOP N iW 3 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM; Budget and Implementation Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Standby Bond Purchase Agreements Related to 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Series A, Series B, and Series C BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 14-19-151-00 to The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (BTMU) for Standby Bond Purchase Agreements (SBPAs) related to the 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Series A, Series B, and Series C (2009 Bonds) for a period of four and one-half years, in an amount not to exceed $2.8 million; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its August 2009 meeting, the Commission authorized the issuance of $185 million in sales tax revenue bonds. The bonds were issued in October 2009 as variable rate bonds in three series — A, B, and C — which require liquidity support, with a final maturity in June 2029. As a variable rate debt issue, the 2009 Bonds were integrated with the interest rate swaps executed in 2006 and 2008 became effective in October 2009. Interest rates on the bonds are reset weekly by the remarketing agents — Barclays Capital Inc.; Stifel, Nicolaus & Company (Stifel), as assigned by De La Rosa & Co. Inc.; and Backstrom McCarley Berry & Co. LLC. — with such rates determined, in part, based on the market performance of similar, tax-exempt bonds with similar liquidity support. To support each series of the 2009 Bonds, the Commission executed three SBPAs with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMorgan) for a two-year liquidity facility, which expired on September 29, 2011. At its July 2011 meeting, the Commission approved an extension of the liquidity facility for a three-year period through September 29, 2014, and changes in certain terms, including a reduction in the cost of the liquidity facility and the release of all of the approximately $14.4 million debt service reserve. The release of the reserve fund allowed the Commission to fund additional project costs. Agenda Item 9A 54 Since the SBPAs expire in September, the Commission may opt to perform one of the following: • Extend the SBPAs with JPMorgan for an additional period at a new fee and amend the existing agreement; • Replace the SBPAs with another financial institution for a new period and new fee, which will require the preparation of new SBPAs and an offering memorandum; or • Substitute the SBPAs with an alternative structure that would bear short-term floating rates of interest (Alternative Structure), which will require the preparation of new legal documents for any Alternative Structure and will require an offering memorandum for publicly traded floating rate notes. Selection of either of these options requires careful consideration of various risks including interest rate, counterparty credit, bank renewal, investor put, remarketing/market access, and term out, as well as the total all -in cost and administrative burden. Based on the changing financial market environment since the recession, staff in consultation with the Commission's financial advisor, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates (Fieldman) elected to issue a request for proposals for the provision of (i) an extension or replacement of the SBPAs to support each series of the 2009 Bonds or (ii) Alternative Structure(s) to the SBPAs. Procurement Process Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal with price and other factors considered. Non -price factors include elements such as qualifications of financial institutions and the ability to respond to the Commission's needs for liquidity support or Alternative Structufe(s) as set forth under the terms of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 14-19-151-00. The RFP was released by staff and advertised in the Press Enterprise on May 22, 2014. A pre - proposal conference call was held on May 28; eleven firms participated. Commission staff responded to all questions submitted by potential proposers prior to the May 29 deadline. Twelve firms — Bank of America Merrill Lynch; BTMU; Citibank, N.A.; Goldman, Sachs & Co; JPMorgan; Mizuho Bank, Ltd.; Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC; RBC Capital Markets; State Street Bank & Trust Company; Stifel; U.S. Bank National Association; and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — submitted proposals prior to the June 12 submittal deadline. All twelve firms submitted responsive and responsible proposals. Utilizing the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP, the twelve firms were evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of Commission staff with consultation provided by Fieldman. Based on the evaluation committee's assessment of the written proposals, pursuant to the terms of the RFP, the evaluation committee recommends an agreement for individual SBPAs for each series of the 2009 Bonds be awarded to a financial institution. The evaluation committee does not recommend an Alternative Structure due to cost, administrative burden, legal, and/or Agenda Item 9A 55 • • • tax and accounting considerations. The three highest -ranked financial institutions to provide individual SBPAs were: • BTMU; • Bank of America Merrill Lynch; and • JPMorgan. The evaluation committee initially recommended an agreement for the three SBPAs be awarded to BTMU for a period of four years in an amount not to exceed $2.35 million, including bank counsel and transaction fees, as that financial institution earned the highest total evaluation score under the evaluation criteria of the RFP. However, in order to obtain an expiration date of the SBPAs that is closer to the annual principal payment date of June 1, the evaluation committee revised its recommendation for the agreement for the three SBPAs be awarded to BTMU for a period of four and one-half years in an amount not exceed $2.8 million, including bank counsel and transaction fees. The increase in the fees reflects the additional six month period and a negotiated fee that is the midpoint between the four-year fee and the five- year fee proposed by BTMU. Staff and its financial team commenced negotiations with BTMU regarding the terms and conditions of the SBPAs; an initial draft of the SBPAs submitted by .BTMU's bank counsel is included as an attachment to this staff report. If the Commission and BTMU cannot agree on mutually acceptable SBPAs, staff and the financial team will then commence negotiations with the next highest -ranked financial institution. Staff anticipates such negotiations will be substantially completed prior to the Commission meeting in July. The recommended financial institution's fees were competitively established and considered fair and reasonable based upon adequate price competition under the above referenced procurement process. The fees represent a 45 percent reduction from the current SBPA fees. BTMU offered the most advantageous combination of qualifications, liquidity support, and pricing. Additionally, BTMU was the liquidity provider for a $60 million letter of credit and reimbursement agreement related to the Commission's commercial paper program until July 2013, when the Commission terminated it as part of the reduction of the commercial paper program from $120 million to $60 million. Staff is confident BTMU will provide the Commission with the required liquidity support at the best possible price. Next Steps In connection with the issuance of the 2009 Bonds by Resolution No. 09-017 adopted in August 2009, the Commission authorized the execution and delivery by the Commission of any agreement that amended and/or replaced any of the financing agreements relating to the 2009 Bonds. Staff, Fieldman, and legal counsel will review the SBPAs, including the accompanying Fee Letter. In accordance with the authority to enter into the extensions or replacements provided by Section 11 of Resolution No. 09-017, it is proposed the Executive Director execute Agenda Item 9A 56 the amendments, including the Fee Letter, to the SBPAs on behalf of the Commission, pursuant to general counsel and bond counsel reviews. As a result of the replacement of the liquidity provider for the 2009 Bonds, an offering memorandum is required and a related resolution approving that document. Disclosure counsel and bond counsel are in the process of preparing these documents to be presented at the September Commission meeting. At its September meeting, the Commission will be asked to approve the form of the offering memorandum and authorize its distribution in connection with the replacement of the liquidity facilities for the 2009 Bonds. The offering memorandum is required Under state and federal securities laws prohibiting the offer and sale of securities such as the 2009 Bonds, unless all matters that would be material to an investor in the 2009 Bonds have been adequately disclosed and there is no omission of material facts. The Commissioners serving on the Board as the governing body of the issuer of the 2009 Bonds will be expected to read and be familiar with the information described in the draft offering memorandum included with the staff report to be presented at the September Commission meeting. The Commissioners may employ the services of experts to take the lead in the drafting and review of the offering memorandum; however, the Commissioners have the duty to review the information and bring to the attention of those responsible for the preparation of the offering document any misstatements or omissions in the draft and to ask questions if they are unclear about the information or their role. The financing team will be available at the September Commission meeting to respond to the identification of any misstatements or omissions or to such questions. Staff also intends to reassess remarketing agent assignments and renegotiate the remarketing fees prior to the September Commission meeting. Revised remarketing agreements will be presented at the September meeting for authorization of the Executive Director to execute such agreements as provided by Section 11 of Resolution No. 09-017. The current SBPAs expire on September 29, 2014. Due to the timing provisions relating to mandatory purchase of the 2009 Bonds, it is important for the Commission to be able to complete the replacement of the SBPAs and offering memorandum with the new liquidity provider and revise remarketing agreements no later than the September Commission meeting. Prior to the September Commission meeting, staff will also provide an estimate of the professional services costs to be incurred in connection with the replacement of the liquidity facilities. Such professional services include the financial advisor, bond counsel, disclosure counsel, general counsel, and bank counsel. The FY 2014/15 budget includes sufficient amounts for the liquidity facility fees and for professional services costs, and a budget adjustment is not required. Agenda Item 9A 57 • Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A N/A Year: FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16+ Amount: $ 525,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing Funds Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 264 19 65505 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-•3ti Date: 07/01/14 Attachment: Standby Bond Purchase Agreement Form (Draft) Agenda Item 9A 58 • CHAPMAN AND CUTLER DRAFT DATED JULY 1, 2014 STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT by and between RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION and THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., acting through its New York Branch Dated as of September 1, 2014 $85,000,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds) 2009 Series A standby bond purchase agreement - 3618386 01 10.doc 4149910 59 SECTION ARTICLE I Section 1.1. Section 1.2. Section 1.3. Section 1.4. ARTICLE II Section 2.1. Section 2.2. Section 2.3. Section 2.4. Section 2.5. Section 2.6. Section 2.7. Section 2.8. Section 2.9. Section 2.10. Section 2.11. ARTICLE III Section 3.1. ARTICLE IV Section 4.1. ARTICLE V Section 5.1. Section 5.2. Section 5.3. Section 5.4. Section 5.5. Section 5.6. Section 5.7. Section 5.8. Section 5.9. Section 5.10. Section 5.11. Section 5.12. Section 5.13. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADING PAGE DEFINITIONS 2 Specific Terms 2 Incorporation of Certain Definitions by Reference l 3 Accounting Matters 13 Interpretation 13 THE COMMITMENT; FEES 13 Commitment to Purchase Bonds 13 Bank Bonds 14 Method of Purchasing 14 Mandatory Reductions of Available Commitment; Termination; Substitution 16 Sale of Bank Bonds 17 Rights of Bank Owners 18 Fees 18 Net of Taxes, Etc 19 Increased Costs 20 Computations; Payments 22 Nature of Obligations 23 BANK BONDS 23 Maturity; Interest 23 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO EFFECTIVENESS 25 Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness 25 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 28 Due Organization; Power and Authority 28 Due Authorization; No Violation 28 Enforceability 29 Disclosure 29 No Litigation 29 Consents 30 No Proposed Legal Changes 30 Sovereign Immunity 30 Incorporation of Representations and Warranties 30 Bank Bonds 30 Financial Statements 30 Compliance with Laws and Contracts 31 Federal Reserve Board Regulations 31 -i- 60 • • • Section 5.14. Section 5.15. Section 5.16. Section 5.17. Section 5.18. Section 5.19. Section 5.20. Section 5.21. Section 5.22. Section 5.23. Section 5.24. Section 5.25. ARTICLE VI Section 6.1. Section 6.2. ARTICLE VII Section 7.1. Section 7.2. ARTICLE VIII Section 8.1. Section 8.2. Section 8.3. Section 8.4. ARTICLE IX Section 9.1. ARTICLE X Section 10.1 Section 10.2. Section 10.3. Section 10.4. Section 10.5. Section 10.6. Section 10.7. Section 10.8. Section 10.9. Section 10.10. Section 10.11. Investment Company Act 31 Trustee and Remarketing Agent 31 Tax Exempt Status 31 Permitted Investments 31 Compliance with this Agreement 32 Pledge of Sales Tax Revenues 32 Bonds 32 The Indenture 32 Liens 32 Pension Obligations 32 Swap Termination Payments 32 Parity Repayment 32 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO PURCHASE 33 Conditions 33 Conditions to Bank Bond Amortization Period 33 COVENANTS 34 Affirmative Covenants of the Commission 34 Negative Covenants of the Commission 40 EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND SUSPENSION EVENTS 42 Events of Default not Constituting a Suspension Event or a Special Event of Default 42 Suspension Events 43 Special Events of Default 44 Remedies 46 OBLIGATIONS ABSOLUTE 50 Obligations Absolute 50 MISCELLANEOUS 50 Liability of the Bank 50 Reserved 51 Costs and Taxes; Expenses; Indemnification 51 Notices 52 Successors, Participants and Assigns 54 Governing Law; Waiver of Trial by Jury; Judicial References; Miscellaneous 54 No Waivers, Amendments, Etc 56 Counterparts 56 Source of Funds 56 Term of the Agreement; Survival 56 Headings 57 61 Section 10.12. Complete and Controlling Agreement 57 Section 10.13. Beneficiaries 57 Section 10.14. Severability 57 Section 10.15. Patriot Act 57 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D Notice of Bank Purchase (Optional Tender) Notice of Bank Purchase (Mandatory Tender) Form of Request for Extension of Expiration Date Form of Letter from Trustee 62 • • • STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT This STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, dated as of September 1, 2014 (this "Agreement"), by and between RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (the "Commission") and THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., acting through its New York Branch (the "Bank"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Commission has previously issued the Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds) Series 2008 (the "2008 Bonds") pursuant to an Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2008 (the "2008 Indenture"), the First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2008 (the "First Supplemental Indenture"), and the Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2009 (the "Second Supplemental Indenture" and, together with the 2008 Indenture and the First Supplemental Indenture, the "Indenture"), each between the Commission and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"); WHEREAS, the Commission has previously issued the Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), 2009 Series A (the "2009 Series A Bonds"), currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $85,000,000, the Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), 2009 Series B (the "2009 Series B Bonds"), currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $65,000,000, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), 2009 Series C (the "2009 Series C Bonds" and, together with the Series A Bonds and the Series B Bonds, the "2009 Bonds"), currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $35,000,000, for the purpose of (i) refunding approximately $53,716,000 principal amount of the Commission's outstanding Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A (the "CP Notes"), (ii) refunding all of the Commission's 2008 Bonds, (iii) to provide funds for authorized projects, (iv) to fund a reserve fund and (v) to pay costs of issuance, all as provided in the Second Supplemental Indenture; WHEREAS, the Commission wishes to ensure the liquidity of the 2009 Series A Bonds by providing for the purchase by the Bank of the 2009 Series A Bonds which are not remarketed upon certain tenders by the owners thereof on or prior to the last day of the Commitment Period (as defined below), as provided herein; WHEREAS, the Commission has requested that the Bank issue the Agreement as an Alternate Liquidity Facility to replace the Existing Liquidity Facility (as hereinafter defined) for the aforementioned purposed. WHEREAS, the Bank is willing, upon the occurrence of certain events, to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds tendered by the owners thereof but not remarketed, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and 63 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1. Specific Terms. As used herein, the following terms have the meanings indicated below or in the referenced Section of this Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: "2008 Bonds" has the meaning assigned to such term in the recitals to this Agreement. "2009 Bonds" means, collectively, the Series 2009A Bonds, the Series 2009B Bonds and the Series 2009C Bonds. "2009 Series A Bonds" has the meaning assigned to such term in the recitals to this Agreement. "2009 Series B Bonds" has the meaning assigned to such term in the recitals to this Agreement. "2009 Series C Bonds" has the meaning assigned to such term in the recitals to this Agreement. "2009 Series B Liquidity Facility" means the Standby Bond Purchase Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 among the Commission and the Bank, relating to the $65,000,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), 2009 Series B. "2009 Series C Liquidity Facility means the Standby Bond Purchase Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 among the Commission and the Bank, relating to the $35,000,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), 2009 Series C. "Act" has the meaning assigned to that term in the Indenture. "Affiliate" means any other Person controlling or controlled by or under common control with the Commission. For purposes of this definition, "control," when used with respect to any specified Person, means the power to direct the management and policies of such Person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise. "Agreement" means this Standby Bond Purchase Agreement, including any and all amendments and supplements hereto. The Commission hereby agrees that, for all purposes of the Indenture, this Agreement shall constitute and be treated as a "Liquidity Facility," as such term is defined in the Indenture. -2- 64 • "Alternate Liquidity Facility" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. "Amendment Fee" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Fee Letter. "Authorized Representative" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. "Available Commitment" as of any day means the sum of the Available Principal Commitment and the Available Interest Commitment, in each case, as of such day. "Available Interest Commitment" means an amount equal to $[950,137] (which amount equals 34 days' interest on the Available Principal Commitment for the 2009 Series A Bonds based upon an assumed rate of interest of 12.00% per annum and a 365-day year calculated on the basis of the actual number .of days elapsed), as such amount shall be adjusted from time to time as follows: (A) downward by an amount that bears the same proportion to such amount as the amount of any reduction in the Available Principal Commitment, in accordance with clause (a) or (b) of the definition herein of Available Principal Commitment, bears to the initial Available Principal Commitment; and (B) upward by an amount that bears the same proportion to such initial amount as the amount of any increase in the Available Principal Commitment, in accordance with clause (c) of the definition herein of Available Principal Commitment, bears to the initial Available Principal Commitment. "Available Principal Commitment" means initially the aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds outstanding of $85,000,000 and, thereafter, means such initial amount adjusted from time to time as follows: (a) downward by the amount of any mandatory reduction of the Available Principal Commitment pursuant to Section 2.4 hereof; (b) downward by the principal amount of any 2009 Series A Bonds purchased by the Bank pursuant to Section 2.1 hereof; and (c) upward by the principal amount of any 2009 Series A Bonds theretofore purchased by the Bank pursuant to Section 2.1 hereof which are remarketed (or deemed to be remarketed) pursuant to Section 2.5(c) hereof by the Remarketing Agent and for which the Bank Owner has received immediately available funds equal to the principal amount thereof; provided, however, that the sum of (i) the Available Principal Commitment plus (ii) the aggregate principal amount of Bank Bonds shall never exceed $85,000,000. Any adjustment to the Available Principal Commitment pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (c) hereof shall occur simultaneously with the occurrence of the events described in such clauses. -3- 65 "Bank" has the meaning assigned to such term in the introductory paragraph, and includes any successor or assign permitted hereby. The Commission hereby agrees that, for all purposes of the Indenture, the Bank shall constitute and be treated as a "Liquidity Provider," as such term is defined in the Indenture. "Bank Agreement" means any credit agreement, liquidity agreement, standby bond purchase agreement, reimbursement agreement, direct purchase agreement, bond purchase agreement, or other agreement or instrument (or any amendment, supplement or other modification thereof) under which, directly or indirectly, any Person or Persons undertake(s) to make or provide funds to make payment of, or to purchase or provide credit enhancement for bonds or notes of the Commission. "Bank Bond Amortization Period" means, subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 6.2 hereof, the period commencing on the Bank Bond Amortization Start Date and ending on the first to occur of (i) the fifth (5th) anniversary of the related Purchase Date, (ii) the date on which the related Bank Bond is redeemed, defeased, accelerated or otherwise paid in accordance with its terms, (iii) the date of the remarketing of such Bank Bond, (iv) the date on which such Bank Bond matures in accordance with its terms, (v) the Substitution Date, (vi) the Conversion Date, and (vii) the date on which ° the Available Commitment has been reduced to zero or terminated in its entirety pursuant to Section 8.4 hereof. "Bank Bond Amortization mate" means the Base Rats; plus one percent (1.0%) per annum; provided, however, such rate shall not exceed the Maximum Rate. "Bank Bond Amortization Start Date" means the second Business Day immediately following the one hundred eightieth (180th) day immediately following (a) the related Purchase Date or (b) the Expiration Date, whichever is the first to occur. "Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event" means a Suspension Event specified in Section 8.2(a) hereof. "Bank Bonds" means each 2009 Series A Bond purchased by the Bank pursuant to Section 2.1 hereof and held by or for the account of the Bank or a subsequent Bank Owner in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, until purchased in accordance with Section 2.5(c) or redeemed in accordance with Section 3.1 or otherwise paid in full. The Commission hereby agrees that, for all purposes of the Indenture, Bank Bonds hereunder shall constitute and be treated as "Liquidity Facility Bonds," as such term is defined in the Indenture. "Bank Information" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 10.2 hereof. "Bank Owner" means the Bank (but only in its capacity as owner (which, as used herein, shall mean beneficial owner if, at the relevant time, Bank Bonds are Book Entry Bonds) of Bank Bonds pursuant to this Agreement) or any other Person to whom the Bank or a subsequent Bank Owner has sold Bank Bonds in accordance with Section 2.5(a) hereof. -4- 66 • • • "Bank Rate" means, for each period specified below, beginning with and including the date funds are advanced hereunder and ending on but excluding the date they are repaid in full with interest thereon as provided herein, the interest rate specified with respect to such period, which interest rates shall be computed on the basis set forth in Section 2.10(a) hereof PERIOD RATE I. Purchase Date through the earlier to occur of the last day of the Commitment Period and the 90th day immediately following the Purchase Date Base Rate II. The earlier to occur of the last day of the Bank Bond Commitment Period and the 91st day immediately Amortization Rate following the Purchase Date and thereafter provided, however, that (a) upon and following the occurrence of an Event of Default or Suspension Event or Ratings Event hereunder, all amounts due hereunder shall bear interest in an amount equal to the Default Rate, (b) at no time shall the Bank Rate exceed the Maximum Rate and (c) notwithstanding the time periods set forth above, the Bank Bond Amortization Rate shall be applicable with respect to all Eligible Bonds purchased by the Bank on the last day of the Commitment Period from and including such day; and provided further that at no time shall the Bank Rate be less than the highest rate of interest on the Bonds that are not Bank Bonds. "Banking Arrangements" means (a) the agreements of the Bank and the Commission set forth in this Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including, without limitation, (i) any commitment to extend credit, to issue any credit or liquidity facility, to purchase any obligation of 'or for the benefit of the Commission, or to extend any other financial accommodation, (ii) any issuance, extension or maintenance of any of the foregoing, and (iii) any pledge, purchase or carrying of any obligation of or for the benefit of the Commission, and (b) any participation agreement or similar arrangement entered into in connection with the foregoing. "Base Rate" means, for any day, the greatest of (a) the sum of the Prime Rate plus two Percent (2.00%) per annum, (b) the sum of the Federal Funds Rate plus four percent (4.00%) per annum and (c) eight percent (8.00%) per annum. Each change in the Base Rate shall take effect at the time of such change in the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate, as the case may be. Each determination of the Base Rate by the Bank will be conclusive and binding on the Commission, absent manifest error. "Bond Counsel" means Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (or another nationally recognized bond counsel selected by the Commission and approved in writing by the Bank). "Bond Register" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. "Bondholder" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. -5- 67 "Book Entry Bonds" means the 2009 Series A Bonds so long as the book entry system with DTC is used for determining beneficial ownership of the 2009 Series A Bonds. "Business Day" means any day other than (a) a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which banking institutions in the State, the State of New York or the jurisdiction in which the corporate trust office of the Trustee is located are authorized or obligated by law or executive order to be closed, (b) a day upon which commercial banks in the city in which is located the office of the Bank at which advances hereunder will be paid are authorized or obligated by law or executive order to be closed or (c) a day on which The New York Stock Exchange is closed. "Change of Law" means the adoption of or change in any law, rule, regulation, statute, treaty, guideline or directive of any Governmental Authority, after the Effective Date, or the occurrence of the effective date of any of the foregoing if adopted prior to the Effective Date or any change after the Effective Date in the application, interpretation or enforcement, of any of the foregoing, subject in every case to Section 2,9(f) hereof. "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. "Commission" has the meaning assigned to such term in the introductory paragraph hereto, and includes any successor or assign permitted hereby. "Commitment Fee" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Fee Letter. "Commitment Period" meansthe period from the. Effective Date hereof to and including the earliest of (a) the Expiration Date, (b) the date on which no Eligible Bonds are Outstanding, (c) the close of business (New York City time), on the Conversion Date; provided that the Bank has paid in full the amount set forth in a Notice of Bank Purchase provided to the Bank in connection with a mandatory purchase of the 2009 Series A Bonds on such date, (d) the close of business on the thirtieth (30th) day following the date on which a Notice of Termination Date is received by the Commission and the Trustee pursuant to Section 8.4(c) hereof, or if such thirtieth (30th) day is not a Business Day, the next succeeding Business Day, and (e) the date on which the Available Commitment has been reduced to zero or terminated in its entirety pursuant to Section 2.4 (including a Substitution Date) or Section 8.4 hereof. "Conversion Date" means the effective date of a conversion of all the 2009 Series A Bonds to bear interest at a rate of interest other than a Covered Rate. "Covered Rate" means, with respect to the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Daily Rate, or the Weekly Rate. "Cut -Off -Date" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.9(g) hereof. "Daily Rate" has the meaning assigned to such term m the Second Supplemental Indenture. -6- 68 • • • "Default" means any occurrence, circumstance or event, or any combination thereof, which, with the lapse of time and/or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute an Event of Default. "Default Rate" means the Base Rate from time to time in effect plus two percent (2.00%) per annum; provided, however, with respect to Bank Bonds, such rate shall not exceed the Maximum Rate. "Default Tender" means a mandatory tender of the 2009 Series A Bonds as a result of the Bank's delivery of a Notice of Termination Date to the Trustee. "Differential Interest Amount" means the excess of (a) interest which has accrued and could actually be paid at the Bank Rate (subject to the Maximum Rate), as determined in accordance with Section 3.1 hereof, up to but excluding the Sale Date, less (b) the interest accrued on such 2009 Series A Bonds which is received by the Bank Owners as part of the Sale Price. "Dodd -Frank Act" means the Dodd -Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, as enacted by the United States Congress, and signed into law on July 21, 2010, and all statutes, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated thereunder. "DTC" means The Depository Trust Company, and any successor or assign. "DTC Book -Entry Account" has the meaning assigned to such term in Exhibit D, attached hereto. "DTC-VRDO Notice" has the meaning assigned to such term in Exhibit D, attached hereto. "Effective Date" has the meaning assigned to such term in the introductory paragraph of Article IV hereof. "Eligible Bonds" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.1 hereof. "ERISA" means the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or any successor statute thereto. "Event of Default" has the meaning assigned to such term in Article VIII hereof. "Excess Bank Bond Interest" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.2 hereto. "Existing Liquidity Facility" means that certain Standby Bond Purchase Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, by and between the Commission and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, relating to the 2009 Series A Bonds. -7- 69 "Expiration Date" means the later of (a) 5:00 p.m., New York time, on [March _, 2019] or, if such day is not a Business Day, the Business Day next preceding such day and (b) 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the last day of any extension of such date pursuant to Section 10.10(b) hereof or, if such last day is not a Business Day, the Business Day next preceding such day. "FAST Eligible Bond" has the meaning assigned to such term in Exhibit D, attached hereto. "Federal Funds Rate" means for any day the rate per annum (rounded upward, if necessary, to the nearest 1/100th of 1%) equal to the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers on such day, as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on the Business Day next succeeding such day; provided that (a) if such day is not a Business Day, the Federal Funds Rate for such day shall be the rate applicable to such transactions on the next preceding Business Day as so published on the next succeeding Business Day, and (b) if no such rate is so published on such next succeeding Business Day, the Federal Funds Rate for such day shall be the average rate quoted to the Bank on such day by three Federal funds brokers selected by the Bank. Each determination of the Federal Funds Rate by the Bank shall be conclusive and binding on the Commission absent manifest error. "Fee and Expenses Fund" has the meaning assigned to that term in the Indenture. "Fee Letter" means that certain Fee Letter dated the Effective Date, between the Bank and the Commission, as the same may be amended, restated, modified or supplemented from time to time by written instrument executed by the Bank and the Commission, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference. "Fitch" means Fitch Ratings, Inc. "Fixed Rate" has the meaning assigned to that term m the Second Supplemental Indenture. "Government Action Suspension Event" means a Suspension Event specified in Section 8.2(c) hereof. "Governmental Authority" means any national, state or local domestic government, any political subdivision thereof or any other governmental, quasi -governmental, judicial, public or statutory instrumentality, authority, body, agency, bureau or entity (including, with respect to the Bank, any zoning authority, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Reserve Board, any central bank or any comparable authority), or any arbitrator with authority to bind a party at law. "Indemnified Party" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 10.3 hereof. "Indenture" has the meaning assigned to such term in the recitals to this Agreement. -8- 70 "Indenture Event of Default" means an "Event of Default" as defined in the Indenture. "Interest Component" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.1 hereof. "Interest Payment Date" with respect to the 2009 Series A Bonds which are not Bank Bonds, has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture and, with respect to Bank Bonds, means each of the days described in Section 3.1(a) hereof. "Interest Rate Swap Agreement" has the meaning assigned to that term in the Indenture. "Investment Grade" means "BBB-" (or its equivalent) by Fitch, "BBB-" (or its equivalent) by S&P and `Baa3" (or its equivalent) by Moody's, respectively. "Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event" means either a Suspension Event specified under Section 8.2(b)(i) or a Suspension Event specified in Section 8.2(b)(ii) hereof. "Law" means the Act and the Sales Tax Law, each as now in effect and as it may from time to time hereafter be amended or supplemented. "Lien" shall mean, with respect to any asset, (i) any lien, charge, claim, mortgage, security interest, pledge or assignment of revenues of any kind in respect of such asset or (ii) the interest of a vendor or lessor under any conditional sale agreement, capital lease or other title retention agreement relating to such asset. "Mandatory Tender" means the mandatory tender of the 2009 Series A Bonds on any date on which the 2009 Series A Bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase in accordance with Section [22.05(a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(5)] [to be reviewed] of the Second Supplemental Indenture. "Maximum Rate" means, (a) with respect to Bank Bonds, the lesser of (i) the maximum lawful rate of interest permitted by applicable law and (ii) 18.00% per annum, and (b) with respect to any other Obligation, means the maximum lawful rate of interest permitted by applicable law. "Moody's" means Moody's Investors Service, Inc. "Notice of Bank Purchase" means (a) in the case of a purchase of 2009 Series A Bonds by the Bank as a result of an Optional Tender, a notice in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, or (b) in the case of a purchase of 2009 Series A Bonds by the Bank as a result of a Mandatory Tender, a notice in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. hereto. • "Notice of Termination Date" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 8.4(c) -9- 71 "Obligations" means the obligation of the Commission to reimburse the Bank for amounts paid hereunder to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds tendered hereunder (including interest thereon at the rate specified herein) and to pay all other amounts owed by the Commission to the Bank under this Agreement, the Fee Letter and the Bank Bonds. "Official Statement" means the relating to the 2009 Series A Bonds (including the cover page and all summary statements, appendices and other materials included or incorporated by reference or attached thereto), as amended or supplemented, or any other final official statement of the Commission used with respect to the remarketing of the 2009 Series A Bonds or any supplement thereto. "Optional Tender" means the optional tender of any of the 2009 Series A Bonds in accordance with Section [22.04] [to be reviewed] of the Second Supplemental Indenture. "Other Liquidity Facilities" means, collectively, the 2009 Series B Liquidity Facility and the 2009 Series C Liquidity Facility. "Other Taxes" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.8(a) hereof. "Payment Office" means The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., NY Branch, at _ Ref: Riverside County Transportation Commission, 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, 2009 Series A, or such other office or account as the Bank may designate from time to time. "Parity Obligations" means, without duplication and except as otherwise provided in the next succeeding sentence, (a) all obligations of the Commission for borrowed money, (b) all obligations of the Commission evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or other similar instruments, (c) all obligations of the Commission to pay the deferred purchase price of property or services, except trade accounts payable arising in the ordinary course of business, (d) all obligations of the Commission as lessee under capital leases and (e) the obligations of the Commission pursuant to each Interest Rate Swap Agreement to repay interest (but not termination payments or fees and expenses) in connection with the 2009 Series A Bonds; provided, in each case, that the obligation described hereinabove is incurred in accordance with Section 3.05(C) of the Indenture and has a lien and charge upon the Sales Tax Revenues that is on parity with the 2009 Series A Bonds. For purposes of Section 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4 of this Agreement only, the term "Parity Obligations" shall be deemed to include only those obligations described in clauses (b), (d) and (e) of the immediately preceding sentence. "Participant(s) " means any bank(s) or other financial institutions that may purchase from the Bank a participation interest in this Agreement or any Bank Bonds pursuant to a participation agreement between the Bank and the Participant(s). "Payment Due Date" means any of the dates described in Section 3.1(a) relating to the repayment of any Bank Bonds. -10- 72 • • • "Pending Invalidity Suspension Event" means a Suspension Event specified in Section 8.2(d) hereof. "Person" means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a limited liability company, an association, a joint venture, a trust, a business trust or any other entity or organization, including a governmental or political subdivision or an agency or instrumentality thereof. "Plan" shall mean, with respect to the Commission at any time, an employee pension benefit plan which is covered by Title IV of ERISA or subject to the minimum funding standards under Section 412 of the Code. "Prime Rate" means on any day, the rate of interest announced or otherwise established by the Bank from time to time as its prime commercial rate, or its equivalent, for U.S. Dollar loans to borrowers located in the United States as in effect on such day, with any change in the Base Rate resulting from a change in said prime commercial rate to be effective as of the date of the relevant change in said prime commercial rate (it being acknowledged and agreed that such rate may not be the Bank's best or lowest rate). "Purchase Date" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.3 hereof. "Purchase Notice" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.5(b) hereof. "Purchase Price" means, with respect to any Eligible Bond as of any date, 100% of the principal amount of such Eligible Bond plus (if the Purchase Date is not an Interest Payment Date) accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the Purchase Date, but in no event to exceed the Available Commitment; provided, however, if the Purchase Date for any Eligible Bond is also an Interest Payment Date for such Eligible Bond, the Purchase Price for such Eligible Bond shall not include accrued but unpaid interest on such Eligible Bond; and provided, further, in no event shall the Purchase Price of any 2009 Series A Bond include any premium owed with respect to any 2009 Series A Bond. "Purchaser" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.5(b) hereof. "Quarterly Payment Date" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Fee Letter. "Rating Agency" means, initially, Moody's, Fitch and Standard & Poor's. "Rating" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Fee Letter. "Ratings Event means (a) the withdrawal or suspension for a credit related reason by each Rating Agency then rating the 2009 Series A Bonds of the unenhanced long term rating assigned by each such Rating Agency to the 2009 Series A Bonds or any Parity Obligations or (b) the reduction by each Rating Agency then rating the 2009 Series A Bonds of the long term rating assigned to the 2009 Series A Bonds or any Parity Obligations below Investment Grade; provided that a withdrawal or suspension of the long term rating assigned by each such Rating Agency to the 2009 Series A Bonds or any Parity Obligations due to the purchase of -11- 73 2009 Series A Bonds or such Parity Obligations by the Commission shall not constitute a "Ratings Event." "Reduction Fee" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Fee Letter. "Related Documents" means this Agreement, the Fee Letter, the 2009 Series A Bonds, the 2009 Series B Bonds, the 2009 Series C Bonds, the Other Liquidity Facilities, the Remarketing Agreement, and the Indenture. "Remarketing Agent" means Barclays Capital Inc., and its successors and assigns. "Remarketing Agreement" means the Remarketing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2009, between the Commission and the Remarketing Agent "Revenue Fund" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. "Revenues" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. "Sale Date" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.5(b) hereof. "Sale Price" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.5(b) hereof. "Sales Tax Law" means the provisions of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code as supplemented and amended from time to time. "Sales Tax Revenues" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. "Second Supplemental Indenture" means the Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2009 between the Commission and the Trustee. "Special Event of Default" means any Event of Default specified in Section 8.3 hereof, subject to any limitations thereon as provided in Sections 8.4(a) and 8.4(b) hereof. "State" means the State of California. "Standard & Poor's" means Standard & Poor's Rating Services, a Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC business. "Substitution Date" means the date that an Alternate Liquidity Facility has been delivered to the Trustee and become effective with respect to the 2009 Series A Bonds in replacement of this Agreement. "Subordinate Obligations" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Indenture. -12- 74 • • • "Suspension Event" means a Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event, an Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event, a Pending Invalidity Suspension Event, or a Government Action Suspension Event, subject to the provisions of Section 8.4(b) hereof. "Taxes" has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 2.8(a) hereof. "Termination Fee" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Fee Letter. "Trustee" has the meaning assigned to such term in the recitals to this Agreement. "U.S. Dollars" means the lawful currency of the United States of America. "Weekly Rate" has the meaning assigned to such term in the Second Supplemental Indenture. "written" or "in writing" means any form of written communication or a communication by means of telex, telecopier device or telegraph, or email; provided, however that with respect to the notices required by Section 2.3(a) (as set forth in Exhibit A or Exhibit B hereto) "written" or "in writing" shall not include emails. Section 1.2. Incorporation of Certain Definitions by Reference. Each capitalized term used herein and not defined herein shall have the meaning provided therefor in the Indenture, unless the context otherwise requires. Section 1.3. Accounting Matters. All accounting terms used herein without definition shall be interpreted in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and, except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all accounting determinations required to be made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Section 1.4. Interpretation. All words used herein shall be construed to be of such gender or number as the circumstances require. Reference to any document means such document as amended or supplemented from time to time as permitted pursuant to its terms and the terms hereof. ARTICLE II THE COMMITMENT; FEES Section 2.1. Commitment to Purchase Bonds. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including Article VI hereof, the Bank hereby agrees from time to time during the Commitment Period to purchase, at the Purchase Price, with immediately available funds, Bonds which bear interest at a Covered Rate and which are not Bank Bonds or Bonds owned by or held on behalf of, for the benefit of or for the account of, the Commission or any Affiliate of the Commission ( "Eligible Bonds") which are tendered pursuant to (i) an Optional Tender or (ii) a Mandatory Tender and which, in either case, the Remarketing Agent has been unable to remarket. The Bank will pay said Purchase Price with its own funds. The aggregate principal -13- 75 amount (or portion thereof) of any Eligible Bond purchased on any Purchase Date shall be in an authorized denomination required by the terms of the Indenture and, in any case, the aggregate principal amount of all the 2009 Series A Bonds purchased on any Purchase Date, together with the aggregate principal amount of all Bank Bonds then Outstanding, shall not exceed the Available Principal Commitment (calculated without giving effect to any purchase of the 2009 Series A Bonds by the Bank on such date) at 10:00 a.m., New York City time, on such date. The aggregate amount of the Purchase Price comprising interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (the "Interest Component") purchased on any Purchase Date shall not exceed the lesser of (a) the Available Interest Commitment on such date and (b) the actual aggregate amount of interest accrued on each such 2009 Series A Bond to but excluding such Purchase Date. Section 2.2. Bank Bonds. Any 2009 Series A Bonds purchased by the Bank pursuant to Section 2.1 hereof shall thereupon constitute Bank Bonds and have all of the characteristics of Bank Bonds as set forth herein and in the Indenture and shall be deemed and treated by the Commission and the Trustee like the 2009 Series A Bonds that are not Bank Bonds, except with any different characteristics as set forth herein and in the Indenture. All Bank Bonds shall bear interest at the Bank Rate. In the event that the average Bank Rate accruing on any Bank Bonds during any period exceeds the Maximum Rate for such period, the Bank shall receive interest on account of Bank Bonds only at the Maximum Rate for such period (the difference between (a) the interest payable to the Bank if the Bank Bonds had continuously borne interest at the Bank Rate and (b) the interest actually paid to the Bank at the Maximum Rate is referred to below as the "Excess Bank Bond Interest"). Notwithstanding any subsequent reduction in the Bank Rate, Bank Bonds shall bear interest from and after the date on which any Excess Bank Bond Interest is accrued at the Maximum Rate until the date on which the interest paid to the Bank on Bank Bonds in ekcess of the Bank Rate equals such Excess Bank Bond Interest; provided, that, upon termination of this Agreement, in consideration for the limitation of the rate of interest otherwise payable hereunder, the Commission shall pay from the sources described in Section 2.11 hereof, to the extent permitted by law, the Bank a fee equal to the amount of all unpaid Excess Bank Bond Interest. The Commission shall pay to the Bank Owner accrued interest, including any accrued but unpaid Excess Bank Bond Interest, on Bank Bonds as provided in Section 3.1 hereof. On any date on which Excess Bank Bond Interest is due and payable, the Bank shall notify the Commission and the Trustee as to the amount of such Excess Bank Bond Interest due on such date; provided, that the failure of the Bank to so notify the Commission or the Trustee shall not affect the accrual of or obligation of the Commission to pay such Excess Bank Bond Interest. All amounts owed to the Bank hereunder with respect to Bank Bonds shall be calculated in accordance with Section 2.10 hereof and shall become due and payable as set forth in Section 3.1 hereof Section 2.3. Method of Purchasing. (a) The Trustee shall give notice by telecopier promptly confirmed by a written notice in the form of ,Exhibit A or Exhibit B; as applicable, to the Bank, pursuant to an Optional Tender or a Mandatory Tender, no later than 12:00 noon, New York City time, on the Business Day on which Bonds are subject to an Optional Tender or Mandatory Tender. If the Bank receives such notice as provided above, and subject, in each case, to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article VI hereof, the Bank will transfer to -14- 76 • • • the Trustee not later than 2:30 p.m., New York City time, on such date (a "Purchase Date, "), in immediately available funds, an amount equal to the aggregate Purchase Price of all or such portion of such Eligible Bonds as requested from the Trustee. A Notice of Bank Purchase shall be irrevocable after receipt thereof by the Bank. The Bank shall have no responsibility for, nor incur any liability in respect of, any act, or any failure to act, by the Trustee which results in the failure of the Trustee to effect the purchase, of 2009 Series A Bonds for the account of the Bank with such funds provided pursuant to this Section 2.3(a) or otherwise. The 2009 Series A Bonds purchased pursuant to this Section 2.3(a) shall be registered in the name of the Bank or, if directed in writing by the Bank, its nominee or designee on the Bond Register and shall be held in trust by the Trustee for the benefit of the Bank. If the 2009 Series A Bonds purchased pursuant to this Section 2.3(a) are Book. Entry Bonds, the beneficial ownership of such 2009 Series A Bonds shall be credited on the records maintained by DTC to the account of the Bank or, if directed in writing by the Bank, a nominee or designee of the Bank, maintained at DTC, and prior to the sale of any Bank Bond by the Bank as provided in Section 2.5(a) hereof, the Bank agrees to give all notices in the manner and by the time required by DTC to exclude such Bank Bond(s) from the Mandatory Tender of the 2009 Series A Bonds as specified in Section 2.5(a). The Interest Component of the Purchase Price paid for such 2009 Series A Bonds shall be paid to the Bank as provided in Section 3.1 hereof. (b) If the Bank receives a Notice of Bank Purchase after 12:00 noon, New York City time, on a Purchase Date from the Trustee, the Bank, subject to satisfaction of the conditions provided in Article VI hereof, will transfer to the Trustee at or before 2:30 p.m., New York City time, on the Business Day immediately following the Purchase Date specified in such notice, in immediately available funds, an amount equal to the aggregate Purchase Price of Eligible Bonds tendered or deemed tendered on such Purchase Date. In such event, all other provisions of Section 2.3(a) shall apply to the purchase and registration of Bank Bonds after the delivery of a Notice of Bank Purchase and transfer of funds as set forth herein. (c) In the event that any funds paid by the Bank to the Trustee pursuant to Section 2.3(a) or (b) hereof shall not be required to be applied to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds as provided herein, such funds shall be held and be returned to the Bank as soonas practicable by the Trustee and, until so returned, shall be held uninvested and in trust by the Trustee for the account of the Bank. In the event that such funds are not returned to the Bank in immediately available funds as provided in Section 2.10(a) hereof by 4:00 p.m., New York City time, on the same day on which such funds were advanced, the Commission shall pay or cause to be paid to the Bank interest on such funds payable on demand and, in any event, on the date on which such funds are returned, at a rate equal to the Federal Funds Rate plus one percent (1.0%) for the day such funds were advanced through the date which is two (2) Business Days after the day such funds were advanced, and, thereafter, at the Default Rate. (d) Notwithstanding any provisions of this Section 2.3 to contrary, the Bank and DTC may cause the transfer of funds and the transfer of any Bank Bond as described in this Section 2.3 on the basis of delivery versus payment or by such other means as shall be acceptable to the Bank, the Trustee and DTC and not contrary to the Indenture. -15- 77 Section 2.4. Mandatory Reductions of Available Commitment; Termination; Substitution. (a) Upon (i) any redemption, repayment or other payment of all of the principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds so that such 2009 Series A Bonds (including Bank Bonds) shall cease to be Outstanding, or (ii) the close of business (New York City time) on the Conversion Date (and provided that the Bank has paid in full the amount set forth in a Notice of Bank Purchase, if any, delivered to the Bank in connection with a mandatory purchase of the 2009 Series A Bonds on such Conversion Date), the aggregate Available Commitment shall be reduced to zero and, in connection with any action described in clause (i) or (ii) above, the Commission shall pay, or cause to be paid (whether by purchase or otherwise), all principal and interest evidenced by Bank Bonds, if any, and all Obligations up to and including the time of said reduction of the Available Commitment including, without limitation, all amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.7, as applicable, and all other amounts payable pursuant to Article III hereof. (b) Upon (i) the redemption, repayment or other payment of less than all of the principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds that are not Bank Bonds or (ii) a partial conversion of the 2009 Series A Bonds to bear interest at a rate other than a Covered Rate (and provided that the Bank has paid in full the amount set forth in a Notice of Bank Purchase, if any, delivered to the Bank in connection with the mandatory purchase of the 2009 Series A Bonds subject to such conversion), the Available Principal Commitment shall be reduced by the principal amount of 2009 Series A Bonds redeemed, successfully converted or otherwise paid and the Available Interest Commitment will be reduced as provided therefor in the definition of such term set forth in Article I hereof (c) The Available Commitment shall, subject to Section 2.4(e) below, terminate at the close of business (New York City time) on the Substitution Date; provided, that the Bank has paid in full the amount set forth in a Notice of Bank Purchase provided to the Bank in connection with a mandatory purchase of the 2009 Series A Bonds on the Substitution Date. The Commission shall comply with the requirements of the Indenture with respect to the delivery of an Alternate Liquidity Facility. On the Substitution Date, the Commission shall pay, or cause to be paid, to the Bank all principal and interest evidenced by Bank Bonds then Outstanding, if any, and all Obligations up to and including the time of the Substitution Date including, without limitation, all amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.7, as applicable, and all other amounts payable pursuant to Article III hereof. (d) Subject to satisfaction of the requirements of the Fee Letter, the Commission may terminate this Agreement at any time following no less than thirty (30) Business Days' prior written notice to the Bank and the Trustee. (e) In connection with any reduction or termination of the Available Commitment as described in Sections 2.4(a), (b) or (c) above as applicable, the Trustee shall provide the Bank with written notice of the effective date of such reduction or termination and, unless and until said notice is received by the Bank, the Available Commitment shall not be deemed reduced and/or terminated pursuant to the terms of Sections 2.4(a), (b) or (c) as applicable. -16- 78 • (f) Except as specifically provided in this Section 2.4, the Commission shall have no right to reduce or terminate the Available Commitment. Section 2.5. Sale of Bank Bonds. (a) Right to Sell Bank Bonds. The Bank expressly reserves the right to sell, at any time, Bank Bonds subject, however, to the express terms of this Agreement. The Bank agrees that such sales (other than sales made pursuant to Section 2.5(c) hereof) will be made only to institutional investors which customarily purchase commercial paper or tax-exempt securities in large denominations, all in accordance with applicable securities laws. The Bank agrees to notify the Commission, the Trustee and the Remarketing Agent promptly of any such sale (other than a sale made pursuant to Section 2.5(c) hereof) and, if such Bank Bond is a Book Entry Bond, specifying in accordance with DTC guidelines the account at DTC to which such Bank Bond is credited; and to notify the transferee in writing that (i) such 2009 Series A Bond is no longer an Eligible Bond so long as it remains a Bank Bond; and (ii) there may not be a short-term investment rating assigned to such 2009 Series A Bond so long as it remains a Bank Bond. Any Bank Owner purchasing a Bank Bond from the Bank shall acknowledge in writing its agreement (y) not to sell such Bank Bond to any Person except the Bank or a Purchaser identified by the Remarketing Agent pursuant to Section 2.5(b) hereof and (z) if such Bank Bond is a Book Entry Bond, to give all notices in the manner and by the time required by DTC to exclude such Bank Bond from Mandatory Tenders of 2009 Series A Bonds except for Mandatory Tenders in connection with a Conversion Date, substitution of an Alternate Liquidity Facility, or other mandatory tender where the Purchase Price of tendered Bonds will not be paid by the Bank pursuant to this Agreement. (b) Purchase Notices. Prior to 12:00 noon, New York City time, on any Business Day on which a Bank Owner holds Bank Bonds, the Remarketing Agent may deliver a notice (a "Purchase Notice") to a Bank Owner as registered on the Bond Register and to the Bank, stating that it has located a purchaser (the "Purchaser") for some or all of such Bank Bonds and that such Purchaser desires to purchase on the Business Day following the Business Day on which a Bank Owner receives, prior to 12:00 noon, New York City time, a Purchase Notice (a "Sale Date") an authorized denomination of such 2009 Series A Bonds at a price equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest thereon (calculated as if such 2009 Series A Bonds were not Bank Bonds) (the "Sale Price"); provided, however, that the Remarketing Agent shall not remarket Bank Bonds following the delivery of a Notice of Termination Date unless the Purchaser shall have received written notice stating that a Notice of Termination Date is in effect with respect to the Bank Bonds which are the subject of such Purchase Notice. (c) Sale of Bank Bonds. Upon receipt by a Bank Owner of (i) a Purchase Notice (which notice shall identify the CUSIP numbers and state the principal amount of the Bank Bonds to be sold), such Bank Owner shall deliver such Bank Bonds to the Trustee (or, in the case of Bank Bonds which are Book Entry Bonds, shall cause the beneficial ownership thereof to be credited to the account of the Remarketing Agent at DTC) by 2:30 p.m., New York City time, on the Sale Date against receipt of the Sale Price therefor in immediately available funds or at the Bank Owner's address listed in the Bond Register, and such 2009 Series A Bonds shall thereupon no longer be considered Bank Bonds; provided that, in the event that the Bank Owner has not -17- 79 delivered Bank Bonds as provided above and the Sale Price therefor has been delivered as provided above, such Bank Bonds shall be deemed to have been delivered and such 2009 Series A Bonds shall no longer be considered Bank Bonds. When Bank Bonds are purchased in accordance with this Section 2.5(c), the Trustee shall, upon receipt of such Bank Bonds and upon receipt by such Bank Owner of the Sale Price, notify the Commission and the Remarketing Agent that such 2009 Series A Bonds are no longer Bank Bonds. Any interest accrued on the Bank Bonds shall be paid to the Bank Owner as provided in Section 3.1 hereof and the Differential Interest Amount, if any, shall be paid to such Bank Owner . by the Commission on the next succeeding Interest Payment Date for Bank Bonds as set forth in Section 3.1 hereof; provided, however, that interest shall accrue on any Differential Interest Amount from and after said Interest Payment Date and, until paid in full, at the Default Rate. Any sale of a Bank Bond pursuant to this Section 2.5 shall be without recourse to the seller and without representation or warranty of any kind. (d) Continuing Obligation. Following any sale of Bank Bonds pursuant to Section 2.5(c), the Bank and each Bank Owner shall retain the right to receive payment from the Commission of any accrued Differential Interest Amount as provided in Section 3.1 hereof and in the Indenture. (e) Delivery Versus Payment. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Section 2.5 to contrary, the Bank and DTC may cause the transfer of any Bank Bond and the transfer of any funds described in this Section 2.5 on the basis of delivery versus payment or by such other means as shall be acceptable to the Bank, the Trustee and DTC and not contrary to the Indenture. Section 2.6. Rights of Bank Owners. Upon purchasing Bank Bonds, Bank Owners shall be entitled to and, where necessary, shall be deemed assigned all rights and privileges accorded Bondholders under the Indenture, other than the right to optionally tender such 2009 Series A Bonds or require mandatory tender and purchase by the Bank as provided in Section 2.5 hereof, and any additional rights and privileges as to payment of interest and principal that are provided by this Agreement with respect to Bank Bonds. Section 2.7. Fees. (a) Commitment Fees. The Commission shall pay to the Bank the fees, expenses and other amounts described in the Fee Letter at the times specified in the Fee Letter. Any references to the Commitment Fee, other fees or payments owed to the Bank hereunder without specific reference to the Fee Letter shall be read so as to include the Fee Letter, which is hereby incorporated by reference. (b) Fees and Payments. The Commission hereby agrees to pay to the Bank (i) the Commitment Fees on each Quarterly Payment Date, (ii) the Amendment Fees on the date of such amendment, waiver, consent or transfer, and (iii) the Purchase Fees within five (5) Business Days upon delivery by the Bank to the Commission and the Trustee of an invoice for such amount (each a "Fee Payment Due Date"); provided, however, that with respect to Commitment Fees, the Bank shall deliver an invoice to the Commission and the Trustee for such fees at least thirty (30) days in advance of the applicable payment date, assuming there is no change in the -18- • 80 • [Rating] during such quarterly fee period; provided that any Termination Fee or Reduction Fee payable by the Commission to the Bank shall be payable on or prior to the date of such termination or reduction regardless of the date of delivery of the invoice therefor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Bank shall be permitted to invoice the Commission for any additional amounts relating to Commitment Fees, in the event of a downgrade of the Commission's [Rating] or an Event of Default which occurs between the date of such invoice for the related quarterly fee period and the related Quarterly Payment Date. Any fee not paid by the Commission by the third (3rd) Business Day next following the Fee Payment Due Date therefor shall bear interest at the Default Rate from such third (3rd) Business Day until the day such fee is received by the Bank. Failure by the Bank to deliver any such invoice shall not modify the liability of the Commission for any such fees; provided that interest shall not accrue on such fees except as set forth in the preceding sentence. (f) Final Payment. All amounts payable pursuant to this Section 2.7 shall be non-refundable. Section 2.8. Net of Taxes, Etc. (a) Taxes. Any and all payment to the Bank by the Commission hereunder shall be made free and clear of and without deduction for any and all taxes, levies, imposts, deductions, charges, withholdings or liabilities imposed as a result of a Change of Law, excluding, however, taxes imposed on or measured by the net income of the Bank by any jurisdiction or any political subdivision or taxing authority thereof or therein solely as a result of a connection between the Bank and such jurisdiction or political subdivision (all such non -excluded taxes, levies, imposts, deductions, charges, withholdings and liabilities being referred to below as "Taxes"). If as a result of a Change of Law, the Commission shall be required by law to withhold or deduct any Taxes imposed by the United States or any political subdivision thereof from or in respect of any sum payable hereunder to the Bank, (i) the sum payable shall be increased as may be necessary so that after making all required deductions (including, deductions applicable to additional sums payable under this Section 2.8), the Bank receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deductions been made, (ii) the Commission shall make such deductions, and (iii) the Commission shall pay the full amount deducted to the relevant taxation authority or other authority in accordance with applicable law. If the Commission shall make any payment under this Section 2.8 to or for the benefit of the Bank with respect to Taxes and if the Bank shall claim any credit or deduction for such Taxes against any other taxes payable by the Bank to any taxing jurisdiction in the United States, then the Bank shall pay to the Commission an amount equal to the amount by which such other taxes are actually reduced; provided that the aggregate amount payable by the Bank pursuant to this sentence shall not exceed the aggregate amount previously paid by the Commission with respect to such Taxes. In addition, the Commission, agrees to pay any present or future stamp, recording or documentary taxes and, if as a result of a Change of Law, any other excise or property taxes, charges or similar levies that arise under the laws of the United States of America or the State of New York from any payment made hereunder or from the execution or delivery or otherwise with respect to this Agreement (referred to below as "Other Taxes"). The Bank shall provide to the Commission within a reasonable time a copy of any written notification it receives with respect to Other Taxes owing by the Commission to the Bank hereunder; provided that the Bank's failure to send such notice shall not -19- 81 relieve the Commission of its obligation to pay such amounts hereunder. The Commission shall have thirty (30) days to make such payments from the date that the Bank requests such payments in writing. (b) Notice. Within thirty (30) days after the date of any payment of Taxes by the Commission, the Commission shall furnish to the Bank, the original or a certified copy of a receipt evidencing payment thereof. To the extent permitted by law, the Commission shall compensate the Bank for all reasonable losses and expenses sustained by the Bank as a result of any failure by the Commission to so furnish such copy of such receipt. (c) Survival of Obligations. The obligations of the Commission under this Section 2.8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Section 2.9. Increased Costs. (a) Costs. In the event that any Change of Law affecting the Bank or a Participant or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (whether or not having the force of law) shall: (i) limit the deductibility of interest on funds obtained by the Bank to pay any of its liabilities or subject the Bank to any tax, duty, charge deduction or withholding on or with respect to payments relating to the 2009 Series A Bonds or any Banking Arrangements, or any amount paid or to be paid by the Bank hereunder (other than any tax measured by or based upon the overall net income of the Bank imposed by any jurisdiction having control over the Bank); (ii) impose, modify, require, make or deem applicable to the Bank any reserve requirement, capital requirement, liquidity requirement, special deposit requirement, insurance assessment or similar requirement against any assets held by, deposits with or for the account of, or loans or commitments by, the Bank; (iii) change the basis of taxation of payments due the Bank under this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds or any Banking Arrangements (other than by a change in taxation of the overall net income of the Bank); or (iv) impose upon the Bank any other condition with respect to any amount paid or payable to or by the Bank or with respect to this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds or any Banking Arrangements; and the result of any of the foregoing shall be to increase the cost to the Bank of extending, issuing or maintaining any of the Banking Arrangements or to reduce any amount (or the effective return on any amount) received or receivable by the Bank in connection with the Banking Arrangements (which increase in cost or reduction in yield shall be the result of the Bank's reasonable allocation, in a reasonable and appropriate manner, of the aggregate of such cost increases or yield reductions resulting from such event), then, within forty-five (45) days of written demand by the Bank, the Commission shall pay to the Bank, from time to time as specified by the Bank, additional amounts which shall be sufficient to compensate the Bank for -20- 82 • • all such increased costs or reductions in yield. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Participant shall be entitled to any such additional amount from the Commission in excess of that to which the Bank would have been entitled had the Bank not granted such Participant a participation in this Agreement. The Bank shall submit to the Commission, at or prior to the making of each such demand, a certificate setting forth in reasonable detail such increased costs or yield reduction incurred by the Bank or such Participant as a result of any of the foregoing. (b) Capital Adequacy. If the Bank shall have determined that the adoption after the date hereof of any applicable law, rule, regulation or guideline (whether or not having the force of law) regarding capital adequacy or liquidity by any Governmental Authority having regulatory jurisdiction over the Bank, or any change in applicable law, rule, regulation or guideline, as the case may be, or any change in the enforcement or interpretation or administration thereof by any Governmental Authority charged with the interpretation or administration thereof, or compliance by the Bank (or any lending office, thereof) with any request or directive regarding capital adequacy (whether or not having the force of law) of any such Governmental Authority, has or would have the effect of reducing the rate of return on capital of the Bank as a consequence of its obligations hereunder or its purchase or holding of Bank Bonds to a level below that which the Bank could have achieved but for such adoption, change or compliance (taking into consideration the policies of .the Bank with respect to capital adequacy and liquidity) by an amount deemed by the Bank to be material, then within thirty (30) days after demand by the Bank, the Commission shall pay to the Bank from time to time, as specified by the Bank, such additional amount or amounts as will compensate the Bank for such reduction from the date of such adoption, change or compliance with respect to such law, rule, regulation, guideline, request or directive, together with interest on each such amount from the date payment is due until the earlier of the date of payment in full thereof or the thirtieth (30th) day after which such payment is due, at the Bank Rate and, thereafter, at the Default Rate. (c) Payment. Each demand for compensation_ pursuant to Section 2.9(a) or 2.9(b) shall be accompanied by a certificateof the Bank in reasonable detail setting forth the computation of such compensation (including the reason therefor), which certificate shall be conclusive, absent manifest error, as against all other Persons, including, without limitation, the Commission and any Participant. The amounts owed by the Commission as compensation to the Bank pursuant to this Section 2.9 shall be calculated as though the Bank were the holder of all Bank Bonds and without regard to any sales of Bank Bonds by the Bank pursuant to Section 2.5 or to any assignments or participations made by the Bank with regard to its obligations or rights hereunder or with regard to Bank Bonds. The Bank assumes all responsibility and liability for payment of such costs to other Bank Owners. (d) Continuing Costs. If such costs are to be incurred on a continuing basis and the Commission shall be so notified by the Bank in writing as to the amount thereof, then such costs shall be payable by the Commission to the Bank on each Interest Payment Date to the extent therefore incurred. (e) Survival of Obligations. The obligations of the Commission under this Section 2.9 shall survive the termination of this Agreement and the payment in full of the Bank Bonds and the other Obligations of the Commission hereunder. -21- 83 (f) Dodd Frank Act; Basel Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement (i) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives in connection with the Dodd -Frank Act shall be deemed to be a Change of Law, regardless of the date enacted, adopted or issued, and (ii) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices (or any successor or similar authority) or any Governmental Authority with proper jurisdiction over the Bank shall be deemed to be a Change of Law regardless of the date enacted, adopted or issued. (g) Increased Costs Cut-off Date. Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of this Section 2.9, the Commission shall have no liability to the Bank for any increased costs to the extent incurred by or imposed on the Bank more than nine months prior to the date the certificate is given to the Commission with respect thereto (such date occurring nine months before the date of said certificate, the "Cut -Off Date"), except where (A) the Bank had no actual knowledge of the action resulting in such increased costs as of the Cut -Off -Date or (B) such increased costs apply to the Bank retroactively to a date prior to the Cut -Off -Date. Section 2.10. Computations; Payments. (a) Computations. Interest, fees and other amounts payable to the Bank hereunder shall be computed on the basis of a year of 365 days or 366 days, as applicable, and actual number of days elapsed; provided, however, that interest calculated with respect to any Bank Bonds shall be on the basis applicable to the interest rate mode then in effect with respect to such 2009 Series A Bonds as determined pursuant to [Section 21.05] of the Second Supplemental Indenture; provided further, that the Commitment Fee shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year and actual days elapsed. Any payments received by the Bank later than 4:00 p.m., New York City time, and before 5:00 p.m., New York City time, shall not result in an Event of Default hereunder if the payment was due on such date, but interest shall accrue on such payment at the Federal Funds Rate plus two percent (200%), which additional day of interest shall he invoiced by the Bank to the Commission pursuant to Section 2.7 hereof. If any payment due hereunder is due on a day that is not a Business Day, then such amount shall be due on the next succeeding Business Day and, in the case of the computation of any fees described in Section 2.7 hereof, such extension of time shall in such case be included in the computation of the payment due hereunder. All payments to the Bank hereunder shall be made in U.S. Dollars and in immediately available funds. Unless the Bank shall otherwise direct, all such payments shall be made by means of wire transfer of funds through the Federal Reserve Wire System to the Bank at its Payment Office. (b) Transfer Costs. The Commission agrees to pay to the Bank on each Purchase Date or Sale Date, as applicable, an amount equal to any charge imposed on the Bank pursuant to the Indenture in connection with the transfer or exchange of the 2009 Series A Bonds. The Commission agrees to cause the Trustee to give the Bank timely notice of each such charge, including the amount thereof. (c) Application of Payments. Payments made to the Bank under this Agreement (other than the Purchase Price of Bank Bonds) shall first be applied to any fees, costs, charges or expenses payable to the Bank hereunder, next to any past due interest, next to any current interest -22- • 84 • due, and then to outstanding principal; provided that payments of the Purchase Price of any Bank Bonds shall be applied to the payment thereof and the reinstatement of the Commitment related thereto. (d) Survival of Obligation. The obligations of the Commission under this Section 2.10 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Section 2.11. Nature of Obligations. (a) The interest due on Bank Bonds (including any Differential Interest Amount and Excess Bank Bond Interest that is not a fee as described in Section 2.2) shall be payable from, and secured by, the Sales Tax Revenues, on a parity with the payment of interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds and the payment of interest on all other Parity Obligations, and any unpaid Excess Bank Bond Interest that is a fee as described in Section 2.2 hereof shall be an obligation of the Commission under the Agreement, payable from Revenues, but subordinate to payment of principal and interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including Bank Bonds) and any amount payable on a parity therewith and any Subordinate Obligations. (b) The maturing principal and sinking fund requirements due and payable in connection with Bank Bonds shall be payable from, and secured by, the Sales Tax Revenues, on a parity with the payment of maturing principal and sinking fund requirements due on the 2009 Series A Bonds and all other Parity Obligations. (c) The obligation of the Commission to pay the Commitment Fee and all other amounts set forth herein and in the Fee Letter as fees (including, but not limited to, the amounts described in Sections 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 and 10.3 hereof) shall be payable from the Fee and Expenses Fund of the Revenue Fund, pursuant to [Section 5.02(A)(5)] of the Indenture, if and to the extent that such amounts are not paid by the Commission from other moneys. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, all obligations of the Commission to the Bank hereunder are special, limited obligations of the Commission payable solely from the Sales Tax Revenues and other funds available for such purposes under the Indenture. The Commission hereby pledges the Sales Tax Revenues, on a subordinated basis to the Subordinate Obligations, to the payment of the Commitment Fees and all amounts due hereunder other than principal and interest payments on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including the Bank Bonds). ARTICLE III BANK BONDS Section 3.1. Maturity; Interest. (a) Bank Bonds. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in such 2009 Series A Bond, the Commission agrees that, each purchase of an Eligible Bond by the Bank pursuant to Section 2.3 hereof shall result in the creation of a Bank Bond. Interest on any Bank Bond will be due and payable on the first Business Day of each month and on each Payment Due -23- 85 Date. Each Bank Bond and the accrued interest thereon, shall be repaid by or on behalf of the Commission (or purchased) as follows: (y) on the one hundred eightieth (180th) day immediately following the earlier of the related Purchase Date or the Expiration Date, as the case may be, and, only if the conditions described in Section 6.2 have been satisfied on such date, said Bank Bond will commence amortization on the Bank Bond Amortization Start Date and will further amortize on each date set forth in Section 3.1(b) hereof; provided, however, that (A) the principal and interest due on said Bank Bond will become due and payable in full on the first to occur of (i) the date on which such Bank Bond is redeemed, defeased, accelerated or otherwise paid in accordance with its terms and (ii) the date on which such Bank Bond matures in accordance with its terms; and (B) notwithstanding the foregoing, such Bank Bond shall be purchased by the Commission on (i) the date of the remarketing of such Bank Bond, (ii) the Substitution Date, (iii) the Conversion Date and (iv) the final day of the Bank Bond Amortization Period (any one of the dates described in clauses (A) and (B) above constituting a "Payment Due Date"); and (z) if the conditions described in Section 6.2 are not satisfied on the one hundred eightieth (180th) day immediately following the earlier of the related Purchase Date or the Expiration Date, as the case may be, then all amounts due and payable on the Bank Bonds shall become immediately due and payable on the second Business Day immediately following such date. The Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase any Eligible Bond pursuant to Section 2.3 hereof unless the conditions set forth in Section 6.1 hereof have been satisfied. The Commission may prepay any Bank Bond as provided in Section 3.1(c) below. The Bank shall use its best efforts to notify the Commission and the Trustee of the amount of accrued interest on each Bank Bond on the Business Day prior to the date on which such amount is due provided that no failure on the part of the Bank hereunder to do so shall affect or impair the interest owing to the Bank hereunder. (b) Redemption of Bank Bonds. Subject to the prepayment of any Bank Bond as provided in Section 3.1(a) and Section 3.1(c) hereof, each Bank Bond, and the accrued interest thereon, shall be redeemed from the sources described in Section 2.11 hereof in equal semi-annual installments, the first of which will occur on the Bank Bond Amortization Start Date, with each subsequent installment being payable, together with interest accrued thereon, one hundred eighty (180) days thereafter, and with the final installment being due and payable no later than the final day of the Bank Bond Amortization Period. The Bank shall use its best efforts to notify the Commission and the Trustee of the amount of accrued interest on each Bank Bond on the Business Day prior to the date on which such amount is due. (c) Prepayment of Bank Bonds. Any Bank Bond may be prepaid or purchased by the Commission, without premium or penalty, upon one (1) Business Day's prior written, electronic or telephonic notice to the Bank (which notice, if electronic or telephonic, shall be promptly confirmed in writing), in whole or in part but, if in part, in a minimum aggregate principal amount of $100,000 and integral multiples of $5,000 in excess thereof. Any prepayment of -24- 86 • principal by the Commission of a Bank Bond (including any prepayment pursuant to the sinking fund requirements associated with the related Bank Bond or any prepayment of principal by purchase of a Bank Bond pursuant to a remarketing), shall be credited against the next succeeding payment due on the Bank Bond. (d) CUSIPs and Ratings for Bank Bonds. (i) The Commission will maintain, at its expense, a CUSIP number different from any CUSIP number assigned to the Bonds that are not Bank Bonds, and (ii) at the Commission's expense, an Investment Grade rating assigned to the Bank Bonds bearing the CUSIP number referenced in clause (i) hereof by at least one of Moody's, Fitch or Standard and Poor's equal to the Investment Grade rating assigned to the 2009 Series A Bonds that are not Bank Bonds; furthermore, the Commission will ensure (at its expense) that, for so long as there remain any Bank Bonds outstanding, the long-term rating assigned to such Bank Bonds are available on the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Description Screen (or are otherwise available electronically to the Bank pursuant to a third -party provider of such information). ARTICLE IV CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO EFFECTIVENESS Section 4.1. Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness. This Agreement shall become effective as of September , 2014 (the "Effective Date") provided that each of the following conditions have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Bank and its counsel: (a) On the Effective Date, the Bank shall have received executed copies of each of the following documents, which documents shall be in full force and effect on the Effective Date and in form and substance satisfactory to the Bank: (i) the Indenture, including the Second Supplemental Indenture; (ii) the Official Statement; (iii) the Remarketing Agreement; (iv) the Other Liquidity Facilities; (v) this Agreement; (vi) the Fee Letter; and (vii) the form of the 2009 Series A Bonds, which may be marked as a "specimen" or otherwise marked as "void". (b) There shall have been delivered to the Bank such information and copies of documents, approvals (if any) and records (certified, where appropriate) of corporate -25- 87 and legal proceedings as the Bank may have requested relating to the entering into and performance by each of the parties (other than the Bank) thereto, of each of the Related Documents and the Official Statement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and the tax exempt status of the Bonds. (c) The approving opinion of bond counsel, together with a reliance letter addressed to the Bank with respect thereto, and the opinion of counsel to the Commission regarding the enforceability of this Agreement and related matters, in each case, in form satisfactory to the Bank and dated the Effective Date. (d) There shall have been delivered to the Bank such information and copies of documents, approvals (if any) and records certified, whereappropriate, of corporate and legal proceedings as the Bank may have requested relating to the Commission entering into, performing, accepting and/or agreeing to this Agreement and the other Related Documents, and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby. Such documents shall, in any event, include: (i) a certificate of the Secretary of the Commission, attaching the following and certifying that such are in full force and effect on the Effective Date: (1) copies of (y) a resolution of the Commission approving this Agreement and the other matters contemplated hereby and (z) all other documents evidencing any other necessary corporate action; (2) the bylaws of the Commission, if any; (3) a copy of the Commission's investment policy applicable to the 2009 Bonds; and (4) a copy of the Interest Rate Swap Agreement if any applicable to the 2009 Bonds; and (ii) an incumbency certificate with respect to the officers or agents of the Commission who are authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement. (e) A certificate signed by an Authorized Representative, dated the Effective Date, stating that: (i) the representations and warranties of the Commission contained in Article V hereof, the Indenture and the other Related Documents to which it is a party are true and correct on and as of the Effective Date as though made on and as of such date; (ii) no petition by or against the Commission has at any time been filed under the United States Bankruptcy Code; (iii) no Ratings Event, Suspension Event, Default or Event of Default hereunder has occurred and is continuing, or would result, from the execution and performance of this Agreement; (iv) the Indenture and the other Related Documents have not been amended, supplemented or modified in any way since their respective effective dates except such amendment, supplement or modification of which the Bank shall have received notice from the Commission prior to the Effective Date; (v) except as described in the Official Statement or any other documents provided by the Commission to the Bank or except as approved by the Bank prior to the Effective Date, no material adverse change shall have occurred in the condition (financial or otherwise) or operations of the Commission between the date of the Commission's fiscal year 2012-2013 financial statements and the Effective Date; and (vi) except as described, in the Official Statement or any other documents provided by the Commission to the Bank or except as approved -26- 88 • by the Bank prior to the Effective Date, no transaction or event shall have occurred and no change shall have occurred in the condition (financial or otherwise) or operations of the Commission between the date of the Commission's most recent audited financial statements and the Effective Date which materially adversely affects the security for any of the 2009 Series A Bonds, or the Commission's ability to repay when due its obligations under this Agreement, any of the 2009 Series A Bonds and the Related Documents. (f) A certificate signed by duly authorized officer or officers of the Trustee stating that: (i) the officer or officers who executed and delivered the Indenture were authorized under the Trustee's governing documents to do so and the titles or offices of the officer or officers who are authorized under the Trustee's governing documents to present Notices of Bank Purchase hereunder, (ii) no Indenture Event of Default has occurred, nor has there occurred any circumstance or event or any combination thereof which, with the lapse of time and/or the giving of notice, would constitute an Indenture Event of Default, (iii) the execution and delivery of the Indenture by the Trustee, and the performance of the Trustee's obligations thereunder, did not, at all relevant times, and will not result in a default under any agreement or instrument to which the Trustee is a party, and (iv) such other matters as the Bank may reasonably request in a form satisfactory to the Bank and dated the Effective Date. (g) [Subject to timely receipt of invoices] [Discuss], payment of the Bank's fees and expenses (including attorney's fees and expenses described in Section 10.3 hereof) payable on the Effective Date. (h) Evidence satisfactory to the Bank that the 2009 Series B Bonds and the 2009 Series C Bonds are being executed and delivered concurrently with the 2009 Series A Bonds and evidence that the proceeds of the 2009 Bonds are to be disbursed as described in the Official Statement. (i) Legal opinions of Chapman and Cutler LLP, special U.S. counsel to the Bank, and Yamoto, Otta and Miyazaki, Japanese counsel to the Bank, each addressed to the Commission, the Trustee and the Remarketing Agent, dated the Effective Date, and as to such matters required by any Rating Agency. (j) The Bank shall have received written evidence satisfactory to the Bank that (a) a CUSIP number has been obtained and reserved from Standard & Poor's CUSIP Service for the Bank Bonds and (b) the Bank Bonds shall have been assigned a rating of at least "BBB-" by Fitch or `Baa3" by Moody's. (k) The Bank shall have received satisfactory evidence that the 2009 Bonds have long-term ratings of at least ["Aa2"] by Moody's, ["AA+"] by Standard & Poor's and ["AA"] by Fitch. (1) An executed letter from the Trustee, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. -27- 89 (m) The Bank shall have received satisfactory evidence that the Existing Liquidity Facility shall have been cancelled and that all obligations owed thereunder shall have been paid in full (n) Such other documents, instruments, approvals and, if requested by the Bank, certified duplicates of executed originals thereof, and opinions as the Bank may reasonably request In addition, (A) the Bank shall have determined, as of the Effective Date, that no law, regulation, ruling or other action of the United Stales, the State of New York or the State of California or any political subdivision or other Governmental Authority therein or thereof shall be in effect or shall have occurred, the effect of which would be to prevent the Commission, the Trustee, the Remarketing Agent or the Bank from fulfilling their respective obligations under this Agreement or the other Related Documents to which such entity is a party and (B) no material adverse change in the laws, rules, guidelines, or regulations (or their interpretation or administration) currently in effect and applicable to the parties hereto, and the transactions contemplated hereby, as determined in sole discretion of the Bank, shall' have occurred. ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES To induce the Bank to enter into this Agreement and to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds as provided herein, the Commission makes the following representations and warranties to, and agreements with the Bank (which representations, warranties and agreements shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement and any purchases of 2009 Series A Bonds by the Bank): Section 5.1. Due Organization; Power and Authority. The Commission is county transportation commission, duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California. The Commission has all requisite power and authority to adopt, execute, deliver and perform all of its obligations under the Related Documents and to incur the indebtedness evidenced by the 2009 Series A Bonds, and to adopt, execute and deliver any and all instruments and documents required to be adopted, executed or delivered pursuant to or in connection herewith or therewith and to perform each and all of the matters and things provided for herein and therein. Section 5.2. Due Authorization; No Violation. The execution, delivery and performance by the Commission of the Agreement and the other Related Documents and any and all instruments or documents required to be adopted or executed in connection herewith or therewith have been or will by the Effective Date be duly authorized and do not on the Effective Date and will not, in any material respect, (a) violate any provision of any law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award in effect having applicability to the Commission or (b) result in a breach of or constitute a default under any indenture, loan, credit -28- 90 • • agreement or any other agreement, lease or instrument to which the Commission is a party or by which the Commission is bound. Section 5.3. Enforceability. Each Related Document (other than the 2009 Series A Bonds) to which the Commission is a party constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Commission, enforceable against the Commission in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by applicable reorganization, insolvency, liquidation, readjustment of debt, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of the rights of creditors generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law, the exercise of judicial discretion and the limitations on remedies against transportation commissions in the State). The 2009 Series A Bonds have been duly issued, executed and delivered in conformity with the Act and the Indenture, and constitute legal, valid and binding special limited tax bond obligations of the Commission, enforceable in accordance with their terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by applicable reorganization, insolvency, liquidation, readjustment of debt, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of the rights of creditors generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law), the exercise of judicial discretion and the limitations on remedies against transportation commissions in the State and are entitled to the benefit and security of the Indenture. Section 5.4. Disclosure. All information, reports and data with respect to the Sales Tax Revenues and Parity Obligations furnished by or at the request of the Commission to the Bank in writing upon its request therefor were, at the time the same were so furnished, accurate in all material respects unless the Bank was otherwise notified to the contrary by the Commission; provided, however, that the representation set forth hereinabove shall not be applicable to information available on the Commission's website (excluding information on the Commission's website required pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(ii) hereof as set forth in Appendix A hereto) unless the same was, at the request of the Bank, furnished by or on behalf of the Commission in writing to the Bank. The Official Statement (other than the financial statements included therein), true copies of which have heretofore been delivered to the Bank, and each amendment or supplement thereto prepared subsequent to the Effective Date (a true copy of which shall be furnished to the Bank), do not and will not as of the date thereof contain any untrue statement of a material fact and do not and will not as of the date thereof omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which made, not misleading, except no representation is made as to any information furnished by DTC or the Bank expressly for inclusion therein or as to any information concerning DTC or the book -entry system. Section 5.5. No Litigation. Except as disclosed in the Official Statement or otherwise provided in writing to the Bank as of the date hereof, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, arbitrator, governmental or other board, body or official, pending with service of process accomplished or, to the best knowledge of the Commission after due inquiry, threatened against or affecting the Commission, which in any manner draws into question the validity or enforceability of any of the Related Documents or in any way contests the existence, organization or powers of the Commission or any elected official thereof to adopt, execute and deliver any of the Related Documents, to issue the -29- 91 2009 Series A Bonds or to perform the obligations thereunder or contemplated thereby or which, if determined adversely to the Commission, would have a material adverse effect on the Sales Tax Revenues or the ability of the Commission to perform its obligations under any of the Related Documents. Section 5.6. Consents. No authorization, consent, approval, license, exemption from or registration with any court or governmental department, commission, board, bureau; agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, other than those which have been or will by the Effective Date be obtained, will be necessary for the valid adoption, execution, delivery and performance by the Commission of any of the Related Documents; provided that no representation is made as to compliance with any "blue sky" or securities laws of any jurisdiction. Section 5.7. No Proposed Legal Changes. There is no amendment, or to the knowledge of the Commission, any proposed amendment certified for placement on a statewide ballot, to the Constitution of the State of California or any adopted State of California law (including the Act and the Sales Tax Law), or any published administrative interpretation of the Constitution of the State of California or any State of California law (including the Act and the Sales Tax Law), the effect of which could reasonably be expected to (a) materially adversely affect the ability of the Commission to perform its obligations under this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds or the Indenture or (b) invalidate, eliminate or materially reduce the Sales Tax Revenues. Section 5.8. Sovereign Immunity. The Commission is not exempt from immunity from liability or suit in connection with any legalproceedings to 'enforce 'or collect' any obligation under this Agreement, the Fee Letter, the 2009 Series A Bonds or any other Related Document; and the Commission is subject to services of process and legal proceedings may be commenced and maintained against the Commission for enforcement and collection in respect of any of the Commission's obligations under this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds and the Bank Bonds, recognizing, however; that the procedural requirements of the California civil and commercial law which apply to the Commission are, in many respects, different from the procedural requirements which would apply to an individual, partnership, corporation or other private entity under similar circumstances Section 5.9. Incorporation of Representations and Warranties. The Commission hereby makes to the Bank the same representations and warranties as were made by it in the Related Documents to which it is a party. Section 5.10. Bank Bonds. The Bank Bonds purchased pursuant to Article II will be transferred to the Bank, free and clear of all liens, security interests or claims of any Person other than the Bank, except for consensual liens or other security interests as may be created by the Bank. Section 5.11. Financial Statements. The audited financial statements of the Commission for each of its fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2013, including balance sheets as of June 30 of each of said years, all examined and reported on by independent public accountants, prepared by the Commission, as heretofore delivered to the Bank correctly and fairly present the financial condition of the Commission as of said dates and the results of the operations of the -30- • 92 Commission for each of such periods, respectively, and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied except as stated in the notes thereto; and, as of the Effective Date, there has been no material adverse change in the condition, financial or otherwise, of the Commission since June 30, 2008 from that set forth in said financial statements as of and for the period ended on that date except as described in the Official Statement or any other documents provided by the Commission to the Bank or except as approved by the Bank prior to the Effective Date. Section 5.12. Compliance with Laws and Contracts. The execution, delivery and performance by the Commission of the Related Documents to which it is a party do not and will not (a) violate any provision of any law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award as currently in effect to which the Commission is subject; (b) result in a breach of or constitute a default under the provisions of any resolution, indenture, loan or credit agreement or any other agreement, lease or instrument to which the Commission may be or is subject or by which it, or its property, is bound; or (c) result in, or require, the creation or imposition of any mortgage, deed of trust, assignment, pledge, lien, security interest or other charge or encumbrance of any nature or with respect to any of the properties of the Commission other than as provided herein and therein; and the transactions undertaken pursuant to the Indenture will not result in a material default under any such law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award or any such resolution, indenture, agreement, lease or instrument. Section 5.13. Federal Reserve Board Regulations. No part of the proceeds of any 2009 Series A Bonds will be used for the purpose, whether immediate, incidental or ultimate, to purchase or carry any margin stock (within the meaning of Regulation U of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as amended from time to time), or to extend credit to others for the purpose of purchasing or carrying any margin stock. Section 5.14. Investment Company Act. The Commission is not an "investment company" or a company "controlled" by an "investment company," as such terms are defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Section 5.15. Trustee and Remarketing Agent. As of the Effective Date, U.S. Bank National Association is the duly appointed and acting Trustee and Barclays Capital Inc. (or a successor or assign meeting the requirements of the Indenture and Section 7.2(a) hereof) is the duly appointed and acting Remarketing Agent for the 2009 Series A Bonds. Section 5.16. Tax Exempt Status. The Commission has not taken any action or omitted to take any action, and knows of no action taken or omitted to be taken by any other person or entity, which action, if taken or omitted, would cause interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds to be subject to personal income taxes levied by the State. Section 5.17. Permitted Investments. As of the Effective Date, the Commission has no knowledge that it has made any material investment of the Sales Tax Revenues, or entered into any agreement for the purpose of effecting any such investment, which is not permitted to be made pursuant to the Act or the Indenture. -31- 93 Section 5.18. Compliance with this Agreement. The Commission is in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and no breach of the terms hereof nor any Ratings Event, Event of Default, Special Event of Default or Suspension Event has occurred and is continuing, and no event, act or omission has occurred and is continuing which, with the lapse of time, the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a Ratings Event, Event of Default, Special Event of Default or Suspension Event or a breach of the terms hereof. Section 5.19. Pledge of Sales Tax Revenues. The Indenture creates a valid pledge in favor of the Trustee in the Sales Tax Revenues and, as of the Effective Date, all necessary actions on the part of the Commission have been taken as required to pledge the Sales Tax Revenues in favor of the Trustee under the Indenture. The Commission hereby represents and warrants that the statements set forth in Section 2.11 hereof are true and correct. Section 5.20. Bonds. Each 2009 Series A Bond (including each Bank Bond excluding tender rights) is entitled to the benefits of the Indenture. Section 5.21. The Indenture. The Indenture is in full force and effect and has not been amended or supplemented except by such amendments or supplements as have previously been delivered to the Bank. Section 5.22. Liens. No filings, recordings, registrations or other actions are necessary to create and perfect the Liens provided for in the Indenture and herein; all Obligations of the Commission hereunder and under the Bank Bonds are secured by the Lien provided for herein and such Lien constitutes a valid Lien subject to no other Liens other than a Lien established by or permitted in the Indenture; the Lien on the Sales Tax Revenues established by or permitted in the Indenture in respect of the 2009 Series A Bonds and the Bank Bonds constitutes a valid Lien subject to no other Liens other than the Lien provided for in the Indenture. Section 5.23. Pension Obligations. The Commission has no funding liability or obligation currently due and payable with respect to any employee benefit plan which could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the ability of the Commission to perform its obligations hereunder or under any other Related Document. The Commission is otherwise in compliance with the terms of any such plan in which the Commission participates to the extent any such failure to comply could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the ability of the Commission to perform its obligations hereunder or under any other Related Document. Neither the Commission nor any employee benefit plan maintained by the Commission is subject to ERISA. The Commission is not subject to ERISA and maintains no Plans thereunder. Section 5.24. Swap Termination Payments. The Commission is not a party to any Interest Rate Swap Agreement that provides that any termination payment thereunder is payable from or secured by Sales Tax Revenues or Revenues on a basis that is senior to or on a parity with the lien securing the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Bank Bonds and the Obligations. Section 5.25. Parity Repayment. The Commission has not granted to the issuer of any Bank Agreement the right to declare any obligations owing to the issuer of such Bank -32- 94 • • • Agreement to be immediately due and payable, or to be due and payable earlier or in proportionately greater amounts, than the Commission's obligations with respect to Bank Bonds and its other Obligations hereunder. ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO PURCHASE Section 6.1. Conditions. The obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds hereunder on any date is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions, unless waived in writing by the Bank: (a) No Ratings Event, Special Event of Default or Suspension Event shall have occurred and be continuing and the Bank's obligations hereunder shall not otherwise have been terminated or suspended. If and to the extent that a Suspension Event shall have been cured as provided in Section 8.4(b) hereof, the condition described in this Section 6.1(a) will be deemed satisfied; and (b) The Bank shall have timely received the Notice of Bank Purchase(s) as provided in Section 2.3 hereof; provided, that if the Notice of Bank Purchase(s) is not received in a timely manner, the Bank will be obligated to purchase Eligible Bonds on the Business Day following receipt thereof. Each notification delivered pursuant to clause (b) of this Section 6.1 shall constitute a representation and warranty by the Commission on each Purchase Date that the condition described in the clause (a) of this Section 6.1 has been satisfied on such Purchase Date. As promptly as possible after satisfaction of the conditions set forth in (a) and (b) hereof, the Bank Bonds to be purchased by the Bank on such Purchase Date shall be executed, registered and, if applicable, delivered in accordance with the Indenture and this Agreement. Section 6.2. Conditions to Bank Bond Amortization Period. Bank Bonds will be eligible for the Bank Bond Amortization Period described in Section 3.1 hereof; provided that the following conditions are satisfied on the one hundred eightieth (180th) day immediately following either the related Purchase Date or the final day of the Commitment Period, as the case may be: (a) No Ratings Event, Suspension Event or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing on the one hundred eightieth (180th) day immediately following either the related Purchase Date or the final day of the Commitment Period, as the case may be; provided, however, that upon reinstatement of the Bank's obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds as provided in Section 8.4(b) hereof, then this condition of Section 6.2 shall be deemed satisfied; and (b) All representations and warranties of the Commission contained in, or incorporated by reference in, this Agreement are true and correct as of the eightieth -33- 95 (180th) day immediately following either the related Purchase Date or the final day of the Commitment Period as if made on such date (excluding those representations and warranties which, by their terms, expressly relate to an earlier date). Unless the Commission shall have previously advised the Bank in writing that any one of the above statements is no longer time, the Commission is deemed to have represented and warranted on such date that the above statements are true and correct. ARTICLE VII COVENANTS Section 7.1. Affirmative Covenants of the Commission. So long as any of the 2009 Series A Bonds bearing interest at a Covered Rate shall be outstanding (including any Bank Bonds) or any Obligations remain unpaid hereunder, the Commission covenants and agrees as follows unless the Bank shall otherwise consent in writing: (a) Performance of This and Other Agreements. The Commission shall punctually pay or cause to be paid all amounts payable under this Agreement, the Indenture and the other Related Documents and observe and perform all of the conditions, covenants and requirements of this Agreement, the Indenture and the other Related Documents. (b) Further Assurances. The Commission will at any and all times, insofar as it may be authorized so to do by law, authorize, make, do, execute, acknowledge and deliver every and all such further resolutions, acts, deeds, conveyances; assignments, recordings, filings, transfers and assurances as may be necessary or desirable for the better assuring, conveying, granting, assigning and confirming all and singular rights of the Bank hereunder or payment of the obligations of the Commission arising under or pursuant to this Agreement and the Bank Bonds, or intended so to be, or which the Commission may hereafter become bound to pledge or assign thereto, including the maintenance of the security interests in and pledge of the Sales Tax Revenues created pursuant to the Indenture. (c) Books and Records; Inspection Rights. To the extent permitted by law and with reasonable notice, the Commission will permit any person designated by the Bank to visit the offices of the Commission to examine the books and financial records, including minutes of meetings of any relevant governmental committees or agencies, and make copies thereof or extracts therefrom, and to discuss the affairs, finances and accounts of the Commission with its principal officials, all at such reasonable times and as often as the Bank may reasonably request on behalf of the Bank; provided, however that the Commission shall not disclose to the Bank any documents and information which are subject to confidentiality agreements and which are not public record or otherwise available under California law for public inspection; and provided further that the Commission acknowledges that its accounting and financial records are not subject to any confidentiality agreement and are available for inspection. The Bank agrees to maintain -34- 96 • the confidentiality of all such books, records and information regarding the Commission which is not otherwise publicly available; provided, however, that the Bank shall not be precluded from disclosing such information or the contents of such books and records (i) to its officers, directors, employees, agents, attorneys and accountants who have a need to know such books, records or information in accordance with customary banking practices and who receive such books, records or information having been made aware of the restrictions set forth in this Section 7.1(c), (ii) to any actual or proposed Participant or Bank which has agreed in writing to be bound by the provisions of this Section 7.1(c), (iii) to the extent disclosure is required by law, statute, rule, regulation or judicial process or (iv) upon the lawful demand of any court or agency having jurisdiction over the Bank or any Participant. (d) Reporting Requirements. The Commission shall furnish to the Bank: (i) as soon as available (and, in no event, later than two hundred ten (210) days after the end of each fiscal year of the Commission), a copy of its audited annual financial statements, consisting of a balance sheet and a statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances of the Commission, including the Sales Tax Revenues for such fiscal year, and accompanied by an unqualified opinion of a nationally recognized independent certified public accounting firm stating that they have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied and accompanied by a certification from the Executive Director or the Chief Financial Officer of the Commission addressed to the Bank stating that no Ratings Event, Event of Default, Special Event of Default or Suspension Event has occurred which was continuing at the end of such fiscal year or on the date of his or her certification, or, if such an event has occurred and was continuing at the end of such fiscal year or on the date of his or her certification, indicating the nature of such event and the action which the Commission proposes to take with respect thereto; (ii) within forty-five (45) days of the end of each fiscal quarter, the Commission will provide the Bank with the quarterly Measure A sales tax report that it receives from its consultants; (iii) as soon as possible and in any event within five (5) Business Days after the occurrence of a Ratings Event, or each Suspension Event, Event of Default or Default continuing on the date of such statement, a statement of an Authorized Representative setting forth details of such Ratings Event, Suspension Event, Event of Default or Default and the action which is being taken or proposed to be taken with respect thereto; (iv) promptly after the receipt or giving thereof, copies of all notices of resignation by or removal of the Trustee or Remarketing Agent which are received or given by the Commission; -35- 97 (v) promptly after the adoption thereof, copies of any amendments or supplements to the Official Statement and each Related Document; (vi) with reasonable promptness, a copy of its investment policy and Interest Rate Swap Agreement applicable to the 2009 Bonds; (vii) within thirty (30) days of the adoption thereof, a copy of the annual budget of the Commission prior to the commencement of each fiscal year of the Commission; and (viii) such other information respecting the business, properties or the condition or operations, financial or otherwise, of the Commission as the Bank may from time to time reasonably request. As and to the extent that any financial statement, audit report or other filing described in Section 7.1(d)(i), 7.1(d)(iii), 7.1(d)(v) or 7.1(d)(vii) has been filed on a timely basis with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board through its Electronic Municipal Market Access system, the requirements of such Sections 7.1(d)(i), 7.1(d)(iii), 7.1(d)(v) or 7.1(d)(vii), with respect thereto shall be deemed satisfied. (e) Compliance with Documents. The Commission will take all necessary steps to assure that all 2009 Bonds will be issued in compliance with the Indenture. The Commission agrees that it will perform and comply with each and every covenant and agreement required to be performed or observed by it in the Related Documents. (f) Amendments to the Sales Tax Law. The Commission shall notify the Bank of any amendments to the law of which the Commission has actual knowledge which could (i) annul or replace the Sales Tax Law, or (ii) amend, modify or adversely impact the Sales Tax Law, or lead to the diminution or reallocation of the Sales Tax Revenues or any portion thereof, which could reasonably be expected to materially impair or adversely affect the rights of the Commission to any or all of the Sales Tax Revenues or to the security of the Bank or the owners of the 2009 Bonds. (g) Changes to Law. The Commission shall vigorously oppose any rescission of or amendment to or any other action under or in connection with the Sales Tax Revenues (including, without limitation, any modification of the Sales Tax Law) which would or could materially reduce the amount of the Sales Tax Revenues or the allocation of such revenues to the payment of the 2009 Bonds or the obligations of the Commission hereunder or which would or could in any manner materially impair or adversely affect the rights of the Commission to any or all of the Sales Tax Revenues or to the security of the Bank or the owners of the 2009 Bonds. (h) Selection of 2009 Series A Bonds for Redemption. The Commission shall select, or cause to be selected, for redemption any and all Bank Bonds subject to redemption prior to selecting, or causing to be selected, for redemption any 2009 Series A Bonds that are not Bank Bonds; provided that if notice of redemption has been mailed -36- 98 • • • prior to the existence of Bank Bonds, such 2009 Series A Bonds called for redemption may be redeemed prior to the redemption of Bank Bonds. (i) Compliance With Law.. The Commission shall comply with all laws, rules and regulations (including all federal, state and local environmental and health and safety laws, rules and regulations), and with all final orders, writs, judgments, injunctions, decrees or awards to which it may be subject; provided, however, that the Commission may contest the validity or application thereof and appeal or otherwise seek relief therefrom, and exercise any and all of the rights and remedies which it may have with regard thereto, so long as such acts do not affect the Commission's power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement or any other Related Documents to which it is a party, ,to perform its obligations and pay all amounts payable by it hereunder and under the other Related Documents. (j) Notices. The Commission will promptly furnish, or cause to be furnished, to the Bank (i) notice of the occurrence of any Ratings Event, Suspension Event, Event of Default or Default as defined herein or in the Indenture, (ii) notice of the failure by the Remarketing Agent to perform any of its material obligations under the Remarketing Agreement or the Trustee to perform any of its material obligations under the Indenture, (iii) notice of any proposed substitution of this Agreement, (iv) each notice required to be given to the Bank pursuant to the Indenture, (v) notice of any litigation, administrative proceeding or enacted legislation which may reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the Sales Tax Revenues, the transactions authorized pursuant to the Indenture or the ability of the Commission to perform its obligations as set forth hereunder, under the Indenture or under any of the other Related Documents to which it is a party, (vi) copies of any material communications delivered or received by the Commission pursuant to the Indenture (unless, with respect to communication received by it under the Indenture, the same are required to be furnished by the sender thereof directly to the Bank under the terms of the Indenture), or copies of any communications to and from the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby that have not previously been disclosed to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board through its Electronic Municipal Market Access system if said communications could reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the Sales Tax Revenues, the transactions authorized pursuant to the Indenture or the ability of the Commission to perform its obligations as set forth hereunder, under the Indenture or under any of the other Related Documents to which it is a party, (vii) notice of any downgrade, withdrawal, or suspension of the long-term rating based on the Commission's underlying rating assigned by a Rating Agency to the 2009 Bonds or any Parity Obligation or the placement of any such 2009 Bonds or Parity Obligation on credit watch by a Rating Agency or, if a Rating Agency then maintaining ratings on the 2009 Bonds and Parity Obligation expresses in writing a negative outlook as to the long-term rating of any such 2009 Series A Bonds or Parity Obligation, and (viii) such further financial and other information with respect to the Sales Tax Revenues and the other transactions authorized pursuant to the Indenture as the Bank may reasonably request from time to time. -37- 99 (k) Liquidity. (i) Other than in connection with a Conversion Date or other refinancing, the Commission shall use its best efforts to obtain an Alternate Liquidity Facility to replace this Agreement in the event (A) the Bank shall decide not to extend the Expiration Date pursuant to Section 10.10(b) hereof or the Commission fails to request such an extension on a timely basis, (B) the Commission terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 2.4 hereof, (C) the Bank shall furnish a Notice of Termination Date pursuant to Section 8.4(c) hereof or (D) a Default Tender shall have been effected with any funds made available hereunder. (ii) The Commission agrees that any Alternate Liquidity Facility will require, as a condition to the effectiveness of the. Alternate Liquidity Facility, that the 'Commission or the issuer of the Alternate Liquidity Facility will provide funds to the extent necessary, in addition to other funds available, on the proposed Substitution Date, for the purchase of all Bank Bonds at par plus all accrued interest thereon (plus any Differential Interest Amount and Excess Bank Bond Interest) through the proposed Substitution Date. On such proposed Substitution Date, any and all amounts due hereunder to the Bank shall be payable in full to the Bank. (iii) The Commission shall not permit an Alternate Liquidity Facility to become effective with respect to less than all of the 2009 Series A Bonds bearing interest at a Covered Rate without the prior written consent of the Bank. (1) Preservation of Existence. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Commission shall maintain its legal existence. (m) Disclosure of Participants. The Commission shall permit the Bank to disclose any information received by the Bank in connection herewith, including without limitation the financial information described in Section 7.1(d) hereof, to any Participants; provided, that the Bank shall require, as a condition to providing any such information to any Participant, an agreement on the part of said Participant to maintain the confidentiality of said information except for the reasons set forth in the second proviso to Section 7.11 hereof. (n) Other Covenants. For the benefit of the Bank, the Commission shall comply with, abide by and be restricted by all the agreements, covenants, obligations and undertakings contained in the provisions of the Indenture and the other Related Documents, all of which provisions, together with the related definitions, exhibits and ancillary provisions, are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof to the same extent and with the same force and effect as if the same had been herein set forth in their entirety and, without regard to giving effect to any amendment or modification of any provisions of the such documents or any waiver of compliance therewith, no such amendment, modification or waiver (except as expressly noted above) shall in any manner constitute an amendment, modification or waiver of the provisions thereof as incorporated herein unless consented to in writing by the Bank; provided, that no such consent shall be necessary in the event (i) the Bank shall have failed to honor its -38- 100 • obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds hereunder or (ii) in the event no such consent is required pursuant to Section 7.2(b) hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a "default" or an "event of default" designated as a "Suspension Event" or a "Special Event of Default" in the Other Liquidity Facilities will not be deemed incorporated herein by reference nor shall such provisions be made a part hereof. (o) Conversions; Defeasance. The Commission shall promptly furnish, or cause to be furnished, to the Bank, not later than its furnishing the same to the Remarketing Agent, a copy of any written notice furnished by the Commission to the Remarketing Agent pursuant to the Indenture indicating a proposed conversion of the interest rate on the 2009 Series A Bonds to a rate other than a Covered Rate. In addition, the Commission will not defease, nor allow the defeasance of, the 2009 Series A Bonds without having contemporaneously satisfied all of its Obligations hereunder, including the Bank Bonds. (p) Remarketing Agent. The Commission shall use reasonable efforts to cause each Remarketing Agent at all times to comply with the terms of the Related Documents to which each is a party or by which such party is bound. In addition, the Commission will not permit the position of Remarketing Agent to be vacant without obtaining the prior written consent of the Bank thereto. After the Liquidity Provider has held Bank Bonds for a period of thirty (30) continuous days, it may direct the Commission to remove and replace the Remarketing Agent at any time, upon forty-five (45) days' prior written notice to the Remarketing Agent, the Commission, and the Trustee, and the Commission agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to remove and replace the Remarketing Agent. (q) Use of Bond Proceeds. The Commission shall cause (i) the proceeds from moneys received hereunder to be used solely to pay the Purchase Price of 2009 Series A Bonds as more fully described in Sections 2.1 and 2.3 hereof, and (ii) the proceeds of the 2009 Series A Bonds to be used solely for the purposes set forth in the Indenture and the Official Statement. (r) Invalidity. In the event this Agreement, the Fee Letter, the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Bank Bonds or the Indenture or any provision thereof is declared null and void or ceases to be valid and binding on the Commission, as determined in a final judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, and such event, in the judgment of the Bank, would or could adversely affect or reduce the amount that otherwise would be paid to the Bank when due under this Agreement or the Fee Letter or otherwise affect the security of the Bank, the Commission will immediately take all necessary actions, including, if required, the authorization, execution and delivery of any additional or substitute indentures, trust agreements, resolutions or other agreements and the appointment of any additional or substitute trustee, to ensure that all payments required to be paid under the Indenture and this Agreement are paid when due. (s) Application of Revenues. The Commission shall cause all [Bond Indentures] to provide, so long as the Agreement is in effect or any Obligations -39- 101 outstanding, that the Trustee shall apply any and all Sale Tax Revenues and Revenues in the manner set forth in the Indenture. (u) Changes to Law. The Commission shall vigorously oppose any rescission of or amendment to or any other action under or in connection with the Sales Tax Revenues (including, without limitation, any modification of the Law) which would or could materiallyreduce the amount of the Sales Tax Revenues or the allocation of the [Available Revenues] to the payment of the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Bank Bonds or the Obligations of the Commission hereunder or which would or could in any manner materially impair or adversely affect the rights of the Commission to any or all of the Revenues or to the security of the Bank. (v) Bond Ratings. The Commission shall maintain long term unenhanced ratings of the 2009 Series A Bonds from any two of Moody's, S&P or Fitch. (w) Sovereign Immunity. To the extent that the Commission has or hereafter may acquire under any applicable law any right to immunity from set-off or legal proceedings, on the grounds of sovereign immunity or any other similar doctrine, to the extent permitted by law, the Commission hereby irrevocably waives such rights to immunity for itself in respect of any claims arising under or related to this Agreement, the Fee Letter or any other Related Document. Section 7.2. Negative Covenants of the Commission. So long as any of the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or any Obligations remain unpaid hereunder, the Commission shall not do any of the following, without the prior written consent of the Bank, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld: (a) Successor. Remarketing Agent and Remarketing Agreement. Appoint, permit or suffer to be appointed any successor Remarketing Agent unless (i) such successor meets the requirements for a remarketing agent under the Indenture; or (ii) the Commission provides at least three (3) Business Days' notice to the Bank and obtains the prior written consent of the Bank to such replacement remarketing agent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld and the Commission may deem such consent to have been given if the Commission has not received any notice to the contrary from the Bank after three 0) Business Days. (b) Amendments to the Indenture. Without the prior; written consent of the Bank, (i) consent or agree to or permit any rescission of or amendment to the Act or the Sales Tax Law which would reduce the amount of the Sales Tax Revenues or the obligations of the Commission hereunder or which would in any manner materially impair or materially adversely affect the rights of the Commission to the Sales Tax Revenues or the security of the Indenture; or (ii) agree to the amendment of the Indenture such that payments to holders of 2009 Series A Bonds are impaired or reduced or the priority of the obligations of the Commission under the Indenture or to the Bank hereunder is adversely affected in any way; or (iii) agree to any amendment of the Indenture whatsoever which will materially and adversely affect the rights or obligations -40- • 102 • • of the Bank or the holders of 2009 Series A Bonds in respect thereof; provided that no consent shall be required or impairment deemed or adverse affect assumed from the issuance of additional Bonds in accordance with the Indenture or in connection with a change in interest rate mode for any 2009 Series A Bonds. (c) Bank Disclosure. Include in the Official Statement any information concerning the Bank that is not supplied in writing, or otherwise consented to, by the Bank expressly for inclusion therein, nor shall the Commission make any changes in any reference to the Bank in any amendment or supplement to the Official Statement. In addition, the Commission shall not include in any offering document for any debt secured by the Sales Tax Revenues (other than the 2009 Bonds) any information concerning the Bank that is not supplied in writing, or otherwise consented to, by the Bank expressly for inclusion therein; provided, that the Commission may include references to the existence of this Agreement, the Bank and its role with respect to the 2009 Series A Bonds without the Bank's consent thereto in connection with (i) the preparation of an offering document for such debt (other than the 2009 Series A Bonds), (ii) the Commission's satisfaction of its continuing disclosure requirements, (iii) the preparation of its annual financial statements; and (iv) compliance with any other legal or regulatory requirement applicable to the Commission. (d) Maintenance of Tax -Exempt Status of the 2009 Series A Bonds. Take any action or omit to take any action which, if taken or omitted, would adversely affect the exclusion from gross income of such interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds for purposes of the exemption of such interest from Federal and State income taxes. (e) Federal Reserve Board Regulations. Use the moneys received hereunder, or permit the use of the moneys received hereunder, in violation of Regulation U, as amended, promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (f) Accounting Method. Materially change its method of accounting relating to Sales Tax Revenues, or the times of commencement or termination of fiscal years or other accounting periods relating to Sales Tax Revenues without first disclosing in writing such change to the Bank. (g) Parity Repayment. The Commission shall not grant to the issuer of any Bank Agreement the right to declare any obligations owing to the issuer of such Bank Agreement to be immediately due and payable, or to be due and payable earlier or in proportionately greater amounts, than the Commission's obligations with respect to Bank Bonds and its other Obligations hereunder. (h) Swap Termination Payments. Enter into any Interest Rate Swap Agreement unless any and all termination payments that may become owing by the Commission thereunder shall be subordinate to the Obligations payable to the Bank hereunder and under the Fee Letter. The Commission shall not permit any Lien on any portion of the [Revenues] securing any swap termination payments to be pari passu with or senior to the [Lien on the Revenues created pursuant to the Indenture] or this -41- 103 Agreement to secure the payment of the principal of and interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Bank Bonds and other Obligations. ARTICLE VIII EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND SUSPENSION EVENTS Section 8.1. Events of Default not Constituting a Suspension Event or, a Special Event of Default. The following occurrences shall be deemed and treated as events of default hereunder (each, an "Event of Default"): (a) Payments. The Commission shall fail to pay when due any fee, expense or other amount payable to the Bank pursuant to this Agreement or the Fee Letter, including without limitation, any amount owing under Section 2.7, Section 2.8, Section 2.9 or Section 10.3 hereof; or (b) Representations., Any materialrepresentation or warranty made by or on behalf of the Commission in this Agreement, the Indenture or in any . other Related Document or in any certificate or statement delivered hereunder or thereunder shall be incorrect or untrue in any material respect when made or deemed to have been made; or (c) Certain Covenants. The Commission shall default in the due performance or observance of any of the covenants set forth in Section 7.1(h), 7.1(k), 7.1(1), 7.1(o), 7.1(q) 7.1(s), 7.1(u), 7.2(b), 7.2(d), 7.2(g), or 7.2(h) hereof; or (d) Other Covenants. The Commission shall materially default in the due performance or observance of any other term, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement (other than those referred to in Sections 8.1(a), 8.1(b), and 8.1(c) hereof),the Indenture or any other Related Document and such default shall remain unremedied for a period of thirty (30) days after the Commission shall have received notice thereof from the Bank; provided, that, if such default cannot be remedied within such time period, such time period shall be extended by the Bank for a period of up to sixty (60) additional days, as long as the Commission shall be diligently pursuing the remedy therefor during such period; or (e) Cross Defaults. Except as otherwise provided in Section 8.3(e), any "Event of Default" as set forth in Section 7.01 of the Indenture shall occur and be continuing or any "Event of Default" shall occur and be continuing under any other agreement between the Commission and the Bank regarding Parity Obligations, if any; or (f) Failure to Preserve Pledge. The Commission shall fail to preserve the pledge indicated in Section 2.11 hereof or in the Indenture or any legislation is enacted, repealed, reenacted, amended or otherwise modified, and such repeal, reenactment, amendment, modification or enactment, in the sole opinion of the Bank, dilutes or eliminates the pledge of or security interest of the Bank indicated in such Section 2.11 hereof or in the Indenture; or -42- 104 • (g) Material Adverse Effect. A change occurs in the financial or operating conditions of the Commission, the ratings on the Commission, or in the rules or regulations to which the Commission is subject (or in the interpretation or administration thereof), that, in the Bank's reasonable judgment, has a materially adverse effect on the ability of the Commission to perform its obligations hereunder or under the Related Documents, and the Commission fails to cure such condition within six (6) months after receipt by the Commission of written notice thereof from the Bank; or (h) Rescission or Adverse Amendment to Sales Tax Revenues. Any rescission of or amendment to or any other action under or in connection with the Sales Tax Revenues (including, without limitation, any modification of the Law) which would or could materially reduce the amount of the Sales Tax Revenues or the allocation of the Revenues to the payment of the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Bank Bonds or the Obligations of the Commission hereunder or which would or could in any manner materially impair or adversely affect the rights of the Commission to any or all of the [Revenues] or to the security of the Bank. Section 8.2. Suspension Events. The following occurrences shall be deemed and treated as suspension events (each, a "Suspension Event"): (a) Payment on Bonds. The Commission shall fail to pay when due any principal payment due on any Bank Bond during the Bank Bond Amortization Period pursuant to Section 3.1(b) hereof (a "Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event"); or (b) Involuntary Insolvency. (i) There shall be commenced against the Commission any case, proceeding or other action in a court of competent jurisdiction, the commencement of which results in an immediate suspension as described in Section 8.4(b)(ii), relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or relief of debtors, seeking to have an order for relief entered against the Commission, or seeking to adjudicate it a bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, winding -up, liquidation, dissolution, composition or other relief with respect to it or the 2009 Series A Bonds, or seeking appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for it or for all or any substantial part of its assets or for all or any substantial portion of the Sales Tax Revenues, which case, proceeding or other action remains undismissed, undischarged or unbonded for sixty (60) days from the commencement of such case, proceeding or other action; or (ii) any case, proceeding or other action commenced against the Commission in a court of competent jurisdiction relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or relief of debtors, seeking to have an order for relief entered against the Commission, or seeking to adjudicate it a bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, winding -up, liquidation, dissolution, composition or other relief with respect to it or the 2009 Series A Bonds, or seeking appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for it or for all or any substantial part of its assets or for all or any substantial portion of the Sales Tax Revenues, results in an order for such relief or in the appointment of a receiver or similar official (each of (i) and (ii) being an "Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event"); or -43- 105 (c) Government Action. There shall be commenced against the Commission, any case, proceeding or other action (excluding any action by the State Board of Equalization to recover its fees related to the disbursement of Sales Tax Revenues to the Commission), the commencement of which results in an immediate suspension as described in Section 8.4(b)(iv), by a Governmental Authority seeking issuance of a warrant of attachment, execution, distraint or similar process against all or any substantial part of its assets or for all or any substantial portion of the Sales Tax Revenues, which case, proceeding or other action shall not have been vacated, discharged, or stayed or bonded pending appeal within sixty (60) days from the commencement thereof (a "Government Action Suspension Event"); or (d) Pending Invalidity. (i) Any Governmental Authority with jurisdiction to rule on the validity or enforceability of this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Act or the Indenture shall find or rule, in a judicial or administrative proceeding, that any provision of this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Act or the Indenture, as the case may be, relating to (A) the payment, when due, of the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or (B) the Sales Tax Revenues securing said 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) is not valid or not binding on, or enforceable against, the Commission; (ii) the State, acting on behalf of the Commission (A) makes a claim in a judicial or administrative proceeding that the Commission has no further liability or obligation (other than by reason of payment) hereunder, under the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds), the Act or the Indenture to pay, when due, the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or (B) contests in a judicial or administrative proceeding the validity or enforceability of any provision of this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds), the Act or the Indenture relating to or otherwise affecting (y) the payment, when due, of the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or (z) the Sales Tax Revenues securing said 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds); or (iii) the Commission (A) makes a claim in a judicial or administrative proceeding that the Commission has no further liability or obligation (other than by reason of payment) hereunder, under the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds), the Act, the Indenture or any Parity Obligation to pay, when due, the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or on any Parity Obligation or (B) contests in a judicial or administrative proceeding the validity or enforceability of any provision of this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds), the Act, the Indenture or any Parity Obligation relating to or otherwise affecting (y) the payment, when due, of the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or on any Parity Obligation or (z) the Sales Tax Revenues securing said 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) and Parity Obligations (in all cases, a "Pending Invalidity Suspension Event"). Section 8.3. Special Events of Default. The following occurrences shall be deemed and treated as special events of default (each a "Special Event of Default"): (a) Payment on Bonds. The Commission shall fail to pay when due (i) any principal or sinking fund requirement due on any 2009 Series A Bond (including any -44- 106 • Bank Bond prior to the commencement of the Bank Bond Amortization Period, but not including any Bank Bond during the Bank Bond Amortization Period) and (ii) any interest on any 2009 Series A Bond (including any Bank Bond); or (b) Judgments. One or more final, unappealable judgment(s) against the Commission for the payment of money, which judgment(s) is not covered by insurance, and which judgment(s) is to be enforced pursuant to a lien upon, or an attachment against, any or all of the Sales Tax Revenues, the operation or result of which judgment(s), individually or in the aggregate, equal or exceed $15,000,000 and which judgment(s) shall remain unpaid, undischarged, unbonded or undismissed for a period of sixty (60) days; or (c) Insolvency. The Commission shall commence any case, proceeding or other action (i) (A) under any existing or future law of any jurisdiction, domestic or foreign, relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or relief of debtors, seeking to have an order for relief entered with respect to it, or seeking to adjudicate it a bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, winding -up, liquidation, dissolution, composition or other relief with respect to it, the 2009 Series, A Bonds or the Parity Obligations, or (B) seeking appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for it or for all or any substantial part of its assets or for all or any substantial portion of the Sales Tax Revenues ,(excluding appointment of any trustee pursuant to the terms of the Indenture or the indenture relating to the CP Notes, and the pledges of Sales Tax Revenues thereunder), or the Commission shall make a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (ii) the Commission shall take any action indicating its consent to, approval of, or acquiescence, in, any of the acts constituting an Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event; or (iii) the Commission shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due; or (iv) the Commission becomes insolvent within the meaning of Section 101(32) of the United States Bankruptcy Code of 1978, as it may be amended from time to time, and any successor statute thereto; or (d) bavalidity. (i) Any provision of the Act, this Agreement, the Indenture or the 2009 Series A Bonds relating to (A) the payment, when due, of the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or (B) the Sales Tax Revenues securing said 2009 Series A Bonds shall, at any time and for any reason, cease to be valid and binding on the Commission, or shall be found or ruled to be null and void, invalid or unenforceable as the result of a final nonappealable judgment by any federal or state court or as a result of any legislative or administrative action by any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over the Commission; or (ii) the Commission repudiates further liability or obligation (other than by reason of payment) under or with respect to any provision of the Act, this Agreement, the Indenture, the 2009 Series A Bonds or the Parity Obligations relating to (A) the payment, when due, of the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or on any Parity Obligation or (B) the Sales Tax Revenues securing said 2009 Series A Bonds and Parity Obligation; or (iii) the State, acting on behalf of the Commission, shall have taken or permitted to be taken any official action, or has duly enacted any statute, which would materially adversely affect the enforceability of any provision of this Agreement, the 2009 Series A -45- 107 Bonds, the Act or the Indenture relating to (A) the payment, when due, of the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or (B) the Sales Tax Revenues securing said 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds); or (iv) the Commission shall have taken or permitted to be taken any official action which would materially adversely affect the enforceability of any provision of this Agreement, the 2009 Series A Bonds, the Act, the Indenture or any Parity Obligation relating to (A) the payment, when due, of the principal of or interest on the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) or on any Parity Obligation or (B) the Sales Tax Revenues securing said 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bonds) and Parity Obligation; or (v) a debt moratorium or comparable extraordinary restriction on repayment of principal or interest on any debt shall have been declared (whether or not in writing) by the Commission or imposed pursuant to a finding or ruling by a Governmental Authority with jurisdiction over the Commission with respect to the 2009 Series A Bonds (including any Bank Bond); or (e) Cross Default. The Commission shall fail to make any payment in respect of principal or interest on any Parity Obligation, issued and outstanding or to be issued, when due (i.e., whether upon said Parity Obligation's scheduled maturity, required prepayment, acceleration, upon demand or otherwise, except as such payments may be accelerated, demanded or required to be prepaid under this Agreement), and such failure shall continue after the applicable grace period, if any, specified in the agreement or instrument relating to such Parity Obligation. Section 8.4. Remedies. (a) In the ease of a Ratings Event or any Special Event of Default, the Available Commitment shall immediately be reduced to zero, in which case, the obligations of the Bank under Article II of this Agreement (including any obligations which have been suspended pursuant to Section 8.4(b) hereof) shall immediately terminate and expire without requirement of notice by the Bank; provided, that (i) the Suspension Event described in Section 8.3(a) will not qualify as a "Special Event of Default" hereunder if the failure to pay the principal of, or interest on, a Bank Bond is due solely to an acceleration of all of the Bank Bonds by the Bank for any reason other than nonpayment as described in Section 8.3(a) hereof and (ii) the Suspension Events described in Section 8.4(b) hereof will not qualify as "Special Events of Default" unless and until the conditions described in said Section 8.4(b) for such qualification have been satisfied. After such termination or expiration, the Bank shall deliver promptly to the Commission, the Trustee and the Remarketing Agent written notice of such termination or expiration; provided, however, that failure to provide such written notice shall have no effect on the validity or enforceability of such termination or expiration. (b) In the case of a Suspension Event, the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds under this Agreement' shall be immediately suspended without notice or demand and, thereafter, the Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds until the Available Commitment is reinstated as described below (or is otherwise terminated or expires pursuant to the terms of this Agreement). Promptly upon the occurrence of any such Suspension Event, the Bank shall notify the Commission, the Trustee and the Remarketing Agent of such suspension and the effective date of such suspension in writing by facsimile, promptly confirmed by regular -46- 108 • mail; provided, however, that failure to provide such written notice shall have no effect on the validity or enforceability of such suspension. (i) Upon the occurrence of a Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event, the Bank's obligations to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be suspended immediately and automatically and remain suspended until the Commission cures the Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event resulting in said suspension or the second anniversary of such Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event, whichever is first. If the Commission shall cure the Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event prior to the second anniversary of such Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event, then the Available Commitment and the obligations of the Bank under this Agreement shall thereupon be reinstated (unless the Commitment Period shall otherwise have been terminated, suspended or expired as provided in this Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Commission shall not have cured the Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event resulting in said suspension prior to date when principal is due on such Bank Bond during the Bank Bond Amortization Period, then the Available Commitment and the obligations of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall terminate on the second anniversary of such Bank Bond Nonpayment Suspension Event without notice or demand and, thereafter, the Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds. (ii) Upon the commencement of the case, proceeding or other action constituting an Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event described in Section 8.2(b)(i), the Bank's obligations to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be immediately and automatically suspended and remain suspended until the case, proceeding or other action referred to therein is either dismissed, discharged or bonded within sixty (60) days from the commencement of such case, proceeding or action, or the second anniversary of such Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event, whichever is first. In the event that said case, proceeding or other action shall have been dismissed, discharged or bonded within the sixty (60) day period described therein and prior to the second anniversary of such Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event, then the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be reinstated and the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as if there had been no such suspension (unless the Commitment Period shall otherwise have been terminated, suspended or expired as provided in this Agreement). In the event that said case, proceeding or other action shall not have been dismissed, discharged or bonded within such sixty (60) day period, then the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall terminate at the close of business on such sixtieth (60th) day without notice or demand and, thereafter, the Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds. (iii) Upon the occurrence of an Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event described in Section 8.2(b)(ii), the Bank's obligations to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be suspended immediately and automatically and remain suspended until said case, proceeding or other action referred to therein is either dismissed, discharged or bonded or the second anniversary of such Involuntary Suspension Event, whichever is first. In the event that said Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event shall have been dismissed, -47- 109 discharged or bonded prior to the second anniversary of such Involuntary Suspension Event, then the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be reinstated and the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as if there had been no such suspension (unless the Commitment Period shall otherwise have been terminated, suspended or expired as { provided in this Agreement). In the event that said Involuntary Insolvency Suspension Event shall not have been dismissed, discharged or bonded prior to the second anniversary of such Involuntary Suspension Event, then the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall terminate on the earlier of the Expiration Date and the second anniversary of such Insolvency Suspension Event without notice or demand and, thereafter, the Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds. (iv) Upon the commencement of the case, proceeding or other action constituting a Government Action Suspension Event, the Bank's obligations to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be immediately and automatically suspended and remain suspended until the case, proceeding or other action referred to therein is either vacated, discharged, or stayed or bonded pending appeal within sixty (60) days from the commencement of such case, proceeding or action, or the second anniversary after such Government Action Suspension Event, whichever is first. In the event that the case, proceeding or other action shall have been vacated, discharged, or stayed or bonded pending appeal within the sixty (60) day period described therein and prior to the second anniversary after such Government Action SuspensionEvent, then the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be reinstated and the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as if there had been no such suspension (unless the Commitment Period shall otherwise have been terminated, suspended or expired as provided in this Agreement). In the event that the case, proceeding or other action shall not have been vacated, discharged, or stayed or bonded pending appeal within such sixty (60) day period, then the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall terminate at the close of business on such sixtieth (60th) day without notice or demand and, thereafter, the Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds. (v) Upon the occurrence of a Pending Invalidity Suspension Event, the Bank's obligations to purchase Eligible Bonds shall be immediately and automatically suspended and remain suspended unless and until a court with jurisdiction to rule on such a Pending Invalidity Suspension Event shall enter a final and nonappealable judgment that any of the material provisions of the Act or any other document described in Section 8.2(d)(i) are not valid or not binding on, or enforceable against, the Commission or that a claim or contest described in Section 8.2(d)(ii) shall have been upheld in favor of the State, acting on behalf of the Commission, or the Commission in accordance with a final and nonappealable judgment, then, in each such case, the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall immediately terminate without notice or demand and, thereafter, the Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds. If a court with jurisdiction to rule on such a Pending Invalidity Suspension Event shall find or rule by entry of a final and nonappealable judgment that the material provision of the Act or any other document described in Section 8.2(d)(i) is -48- 110 • • valid and binding on, or enforceable against, the State, acting on behalf of the Commission, or the Commission or that the claim or contest described in Section 8.2(d)(ii) shall have been dismissed pursuant to a final and nonappealable judgment, then the Available Commitment and the obligations of the Bank under this Agreement shall, in each such case, thereupon be reinstated (unless the Commitment Period shall otherwise have been terminated, suspended or expired as provided in this Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the suspension of the obligations of the Bank pursuant to a Pending Invalidity Suspension Event remains in effect and litigation is still pending and a determination regarding same shall not have been dismissed or otherwise made pursuant to a final and non -appealable judgment, as the case may be, on the second anniversary of such Pending Invalidity Suspension Event, then the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds shall terminate on the earlier of the Expiration Date and the second anniversary of such Pending Invalidity Suspension Event without notice or demand and, thereafter, the Bank shall be under no obligation to purchase Eligible Bonds. In the case of each Suspension Event, the Commission shall cause the Trustee to subsequently notify all Bondholders of the suspension and/or termination of both the Available Commitment and the obligation of the Bank to purchase Eligible Bonds. (c) Upon the occurrence of a Ratings Event, Suspension Event or any Event of Default, the Bank shall have all remedies provided at law or equity, including, without limitation, specific performance; and in addition, the Bank, in its sole discretion, may do one or more of the following: (i) declare all obligations of the Commission to the Bank hereunder (other than payments of principal and redemption price of and interest on the Bank Bonds) to be immediately due and payable, and the same shall thereupon become due and payable without demand, presentment, protest, notice of intent to accelerate, notice of acceleration or further notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived; (ii) the Bank may give written notice of such Event of Default and termination of the Agreement (a "Notice of Termination Date") to the Trustee, the Commission and the Remarketing Agent requesting a Default Tender; provided, that the obligation of the Bank to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds shall terminate on the thirtieth (30th) day (or if such day is not a Business Day, the next following Business Day) after such Notice of Termination Date is received by the Trustee and, on such date, the Available Commitment shall terminate and the Bank shall be under no obligation hereunder to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds; (iii) exercise any right or remedy available to it under any other provision of this Agreement; or (iv) exercise any other rights or remedies available under the Indenture and any other Related Document, any other agreement or at law or in equity; provided, further, however, the Bank shall not have the right to terminate its obligation to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds except as provided in this Section 8.4. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no failure or delay by the Bank in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder, under the Indenture and any other Related Document or under the 2009 Series A Bonds and no course of dealing between the Commission and the Bank shall operate as a waiver hereof or thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise hereof or thereof preclude any other or further exercise hereof or thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. The rights and remedies herein provided shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies which the Bank would otherwise have. -49- 111 (d) In addition to the foregoing, upon the occurrence of a Ratings Event, Special Event of Default, Suspension Event or any Event of Default hereunder, all Obligations due and payable hereunder (including any Bank Bonds) shall bear interest at the Default Rate. ARTICLE IX OBLIGATIONS ABSOLUTE Section 9.1. Obligations Absolute. The obligations of the Commission under this Agreement shall be absolute, unconditional and irrevocable and shall be paid or performed strictly in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, under all circumstances whatsoever, including, without limitation, the following circumstances: (a) any lack of validity or .enforceability of this Agreement, the Indenture or any other Related Document or any other agreement or instrument delivered in connection herewith or therewith; (b) any amendment or waiver of, or any consent to departure from, the terms of the Indenture or any other Related Document; (c) the existence of any claim, set-off, defense or other right which the Commission may have at any time against the Trustee, the Remarketing Agent, the Bank or any other Person, whether in connection with this Agreement, the Indenture, any; other Related Document or any unrelated transaction; provided, however, that nothing; herein contained shall prevent the assertion of such claim by separate suit; (d) any statement or any other document presented other than .by the .Bank under this Agreement, the Indenture or any of the other Related Documents proving to be forged, fraudulent, invalid or insufficient in any respect or any statement therein being untrue or inaccurate in any respect whatsoever; (e) the purchase of a Bank Bond after the delivery of a Notice of Bank Purchase that does not comply with the terms of this Agreement; or (f) any other circumstances or happening whatsoever, whether or not similar to any of the foregoing. ARTICLE X MISCELLANEOUS Section 10.1 Liability of the Bank. (a) With respect to the Bank, the Commission assumes all risks of the acts or omissions of the Trustee, the Remarketing Agent and any of their agents in respect of their use of this Agreement or any amounts made available by the Bank hereunder. To the extent permitted by applicable law, neither the Bank nor any of it officers or -50- 112 • • • directors shall be liable or responsible for: (i) the use which may be made of this Agreement or any amounts made available by the Bank hereunder or for any acts or omissions of the Trustee or Remarketing Agent or their agents in connection therewith, (ii) the validity, sufficiency or genuineness of documents (other than this Agreement), or of any endorsements thereon, even if such documents should in fact prove to be in any or all respects invalid, insufficient, fraudulent or forged; (iii) any action, inaction or omission which may be taken by the Bank in good faith without gross negligence in connection with the Agreement; (iv) the validity, sufficiency or genuineness of documents (other than this Agreement), or of any endorsements thereon, even if such documents should in fact prove to be in any or all respects invalid, insufficient, fraudulent or forged; (v) payment by the Bank against presentation of documents which do not comply with the terms of this Agreement, including failure of any documents to bear any reference or adequate reference to this Agreement; or (vi) any other circumstances whatsoever in making or failing to make payment under this Agreement, except only that the Commission shall have a claim against the Bank and the Bank shall be liable to the Commission to the extent, but only to the extent, of any direct, as opposed to consequential, damages suffered by the Commission which the Commission proves were caused by the Bank's gross negligence or willful failure to make payment under this Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof. In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, the Bank may accept documents that the Bank in good faith determines appear on their face to be in order, without responsibility for further investigation, regardless of any notice or information to the contrary. (b) The Commission assumes all risks associated with the acceptance by the Bank of documents received by telecommunication, it being agreed that the use of telecommunication devices is for the benefit of the Commission and that the Bank assumes no liabilities or risks with respect thereto. Section 10.2. [Reserved]. Section 10.3. Costs and Taxes; Expenses; Indemnification. (a) The Commission shall pay to the Bank the following amounts: (i) on the Effective Date pursuant to a written invoice received at least two (2) Business Days prior to the Effective Date, all reasonable costs and expenses actually incurred by the Bank, the Bank's out-of-pocket expenses (not to exceed $1,500 in connection with the 2009 Bonds), and the fees and disbursements of the Bank's counsel in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of this Agreement and any other documents and instruments that may be delivered in connection therewith, plus the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of counsel to the Bank (said fees not exceed $50,000 in connection with the 2009 Bonds), (ii) thirty (30) days following the Commission's receipt of a written invoice from the Bank for such amounts, all costs and expenses incurred by the Bank, including reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses of counsel for the Bank, otherwise arising in connection with this Agreement and the Related Documents, including, without limitation, in connection with any amendment hereto or thereto, the enforcement hereof or thereof or the protection of the rights of the Bank hereunder or thereunder, and (iii) thirty (30) days following the Commission's receipt of a written invoice from the Bank for such amounts, any and all stamp, excise or other similar tax and any penalties or interest with respect thereto, which may be assessed, levied or collected by any jurisdiction in connection with the execution, delivery and -51- 113 performance of, or any payment made under, this Agreement and any other documents or instruments that may be delivered in connection herewith. (b) To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Commission hereby indemnifies and holds harmless the Bank and its respective officers, directors, employees and agents (each, an "Indemnified Party") from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses whatsoever which any Indemnified Party may incur (or which may claimed against the Indemnified Party by any person or entity whatsoever) by reason of or in connection with the offering and sale of the 2009 Series A Bonds (including, -without limitation, by reason of any inaccuracy in any material respect, or any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of any material fact, contained in the Official Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto, or by reason of the omission or alleged omission to state therein a material fact necessary to make such statements, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading), the execution and delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Fee Letter by the Commission and the Bank, and payment or failure to pay under' this Agreement by the Bank or any other aspect of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any of the other Related Documents, and any impairment or potential impairment of the Sales Tax (as defined in the Indenture); provided, however, that the Commission shall not be required to indemnify any Indemnified Party for any claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses (i) to the extent, but only to the extent, caused by the willful misconduct or gross' negligence of the Indemnified Party or its respective officers, directors, employees or agents or (ii) in the case of any action or proceeding alleging an inaccuracy in a material respect, or an untrue statement, with respect to information supplied in writing by the Bank contained in the Official Statement (the "Bank Information"), if, in any such action or proceeding, it is finally determined that the Bank was liable in providing Bank Information which contained an inaccuracy in any material respect or an untrue statement of a material fact. (c) Subject to applicable law, nothing in this Section 10.3 is intended to limit any other obligations of the Commission contained in Articles II and III hereof and the obligations of the Commission under this Section 10.3 shall be in addition to any and all rights of reimbursement, indemnification, subrogation or any other rights pursuant hereto or under law or equity. (d) The provisions of this Section 10.3 shall survive the termination of this Agreement and payment of the Obligations. Section 10.4. Notices. Unless otherwise specified herein, all notices, requests, demands or other communications to or upon the respective parties hereto or referred to herein shall be deemed to have been given (a) in the case of notice by letter, when delivered by hand or four (4) days after the same is deposited in the mails, first-class postage prepaid, and (b) in the case of notice by telecopier or email, when sent, receipt confirmed, addressed to them as follows or at such other address as any of the parties hereto may designate by written notice to the other parties hereto and to the Remarketing Agent: -52- 114 • Commission: If to the Commission by U.S. Postal Service: If to the Commission by other carrier: Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, California 92502 Attention: Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer Telephone: (951) 787-7141 Facsimile: (951) 787-7920 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92501 Attention: Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer Telephone: (951) 787-7141 Facsimile: (951) 787-7920 Bank: For purposes of Notices of Bank Purchase, billing and payment The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. For all other purposes: The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. 445 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Attention: Jay Goldstone, Managing Director Telephone: (213) 236-5993 Facsimile: (213) 236-6917 Email joldstone@us.mufg.jp Remarketing Agent: Barclays Capital Trustee: U.S. Bank National Association Section 10.5. Successors, Participants and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Commission and the Bank and their respective successors, endorsees and assigns, except that (i) the Commission may not assign or transfer its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the Bank; provided, however, that if and to the extent the rights and obligations of the Commission hereunder are assigned or transferred to a successor entity pursuant to State legislation, and such assignee or transferee assumes said rights and obligations in a written notice to the Bank, the consent of the Bank hereunder will not be required; and (ii) the Bank may not assign or transfer its rights or obligations hereunder without providing thirty (30) days' written notice thereof to the Commission and the Remarketing Agent and without obtaining written notice from Standard & Poor's, if the 2009 Series A Bonds are rated by Standard & Poor's, Moody's, if the 2009 Series A Bonds are rated by Moody's, and Fitch, if the 2009 Series A Bonds are rated by Fitch that such assignment will not result in a suspension, lowering or withdrawal of the rating on the 2009 Series A Bonds. The Bank may grant a participation to any financial institution in all or any part of, or any interest (undivided or divided) in, the Bank's rights and benefits under this Agreement and any 2009 Series A Bonds owned by it, and to the extent of that participation such Participant shall, except as set forth in the following clause (b), have the same rights and benefits against the Commission hereunder as it would have had if such Participant were the Bank hereunder; provided, that (a) no such participation shall affect the obligations of the Bank to purchase 2009 Series A Bonds as herein provided; (b) the Commission shall be required to deal only with the Bank with respect to any matters under this Agreement and no such Participant shall be entitled to enforce directly against the Commission any provision hereunder; and (c) such Participant shall not be any Person registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, substantially all of the assets of which are invested in obligations exempt from federal income taxation under Section 103 or 103A of the Code or any similar or successor provision. The obligations of the Bank under this Agreement or any part hereof may be assigned by the Bank to any financial institution only with the prior written consent of the Commission. (b) The Bank may assign and pledge all or any portion of the obligations owing to it to any Federal Reserve Bank or the United States Treasury as collateral security pursuant to Regulation A of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and any Operation Circular issued by such Federal Reserve Bank; provided, that any payment in respect of such assigned obligations made by the Commission to the Bank in accordance with the terms of this Agreement shall satisfy the Commission's obligations hereunder in respect of such assigned obligation to the extent of such payment. No such assignment shall release the Bank from its obligations hereunder. Section 10.6. Governing Law; Waiver of Trial by Jury; Judicial References; Miscellaneous. (a) THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACT UNDER, AND FOR ALL PURPOSES SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THIS AGREEMENT AND THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE AUTHORITY HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. -54- 116 • (b) EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE FEE LETTER OR ANY OTHER RELATED DOCUMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR ANY OTHER THEORY). IF AND TO THE EXTENT THE FOREGOING WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS UNENFORCEABLE FOR ANY REASON, THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY CONSENT TO THE ADJUDICATION OF ANY AND ALL CLAIMS PURSUANT TO JUDICIAL REFERENCE AS PROVIDED IN CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 638, AND THE JUDICIAL REFEREE SHALL BE EMPOWERED TO DETERMINE ANY AND ALL ISSUES IN SUCH REFERENCE WHETHER FACT OR LAW. EACH PARTY HERETO ACKNOWLEDGES AND REPRESENTS THAT IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT, THE FEE LETTER AND THE OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION, AND THAT IT HAS REVIEWED THIS WAIVER AND CONSENT, AND KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVES ITS JURY TRIAL RIGHTS AND CONSENTS TO JUDICIAL REFERENCES FOLLOWING THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL OF ITS CHOICE ON SUCH MATTERS. IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, A COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE FILED AS A WRITTEN CONSENT TO A TRIAL BY THE COURT OR TO JUDICIAL REFERENCE UNDER CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURES SECTION 678 AS PROVIDED HEREIN. (C) TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE WAIVERS MADE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION 10.6 SHALL BE IRREVOCABLE AND UNMODIFIABLE, WHETHER IN WRITING OR ORALLY, AND SHALL BE APPLICABLE TO ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS, RENEWALS, SUPPLEMENTS OR MODIFICATIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, THIS AGREEMENT MAY, TO THE EXTENT PERMIFI'ED BY APPLICABLE LAW, BE FILED AS A WRITTEN CONSENT TO A TRIAL BY THE COURT SITTING WITHOUT A JURY. (d) EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY SUBMITS, FOR ITSELF AND ITS PROPERTY, TO THE NONEXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK OR CALIFORNIA, IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE FEE LETTER OR ANY OTHER RELATED DOCUMENT, OR FOR RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT OF ANY JUDGMENT, AND EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN SUCH NEW YORK STATE COURT OR CALIFORNIA STATE COURT OR, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN SUCH FEDERAL COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE FEE LETTER OR IN ANY OTHER RELATED DOCUMENT SHALL AFFECT ANY RIGHT THAT THE BANK MAY OTHERWISE HAVE TO BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE FEE LETTER OR ANY OTHER RELATED DOCUMENT AGAINST THE COMMISSION OR ANY OTHER PARTY OR ITS PROPERTIES IN THE COURTS OF ANY JURISDICTION. (e) WAIVER OF VENUE. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION THAT IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE LAYING OF VENUE OF ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE FEE LETTER OR ANY OTHER -55- 117 RELATED DOCUMENT IN ANY COURT REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH (D) OF THIS SECTION. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY SUCH COURT. (f) THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER IRREVOCABLY CONSENT TO THE SERVICE OF PROCESS IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING BY THE MAILING OF COPIES THEREOF BY REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO SUCH PARTY AT ITS ADDRESS SET FORTH IN SECTION 10.6 HEREOF, SUCH SERVICE TO BECOME EFFECTIVE 30 DAYS AFTER SUCH MAILING. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF THE PARTIES HERETO TO SERVE PROCESS IN ANY OTHER MANNER PERMIT 1'ED BY LAW. Section 10.7. No Waivers, Amendments, Etc. No provision of this Agreement shall be waived, amended or supplemented except by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto. This Agreement may not be amended or modified without the prior written consent of each party hereto and the Commission agrees to use its best efforts to deliver to the Trustee and each Rating Agency a copy of any amendment to this Agreement. Section 10.8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Section 10.9. Source of Funds. The Bank agrees that all funds provided by the Bank hereunder will be paid from funds of the Bank and not directly or indirectly from funds or collateral on deposit with or for the account of, or pledged with or for the account of, the Bank by the Commission. Section 10.10. Term of the Agreement; Survival. (a) Term. The term of this Agreement shall be until the later of (x) the last day of the Commitment Period and (y) the payment in full of the principal of and interest on all Bank Bonds and all Obligations due hereunder. (b) Extension of Term. Upon the written request of the Commission received by the Bank no earlier than one hundred eighty (180) days and no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Expiration Date then in effect, or such other date to which the Bank may consent in writing, the Bank shall, using commercially reasonable efforts, within sixty (60) days after its receipt of such request notify the Commission, the Trustee and the Remarketing Agent whether or not it will extend the current Expiration Date. Any extension shall be at the sole and absolute discretion of the Bank. If the Bank fails to notify the Commission of its decision within such 60-day period, the Bank shall be deemed to have rejected such request. Any such request by the Commission for an extension of the Expiration Date shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit C hereto (or in such other form to which the Bank may consent in writing) and, unless the Bank shall otherwise consent, shall include (i) a statement of the outstanding principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds, (ii) a reasonably detailed description of any Ratings Event, Suspension Event or any and all Events of Default and all conditions, events and acts which with notice or -56- 118 • • • lapse of time or both would become a Ratings Event, Suspension Event or an Event of Default, and (iii) any other pertinent information requested by the Bank. (c) Survival of Obligations. To the extent permitted by law, the obligations of the Commission under Sections 2.2, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.1 and 10.3 hereof, including all Obligations set forth herein, shall survive for up to three (3) years after the termination of the Available Commitment. Section 10.11. Headings. Section headings in this Agreement are included herein for convenience of reference only and shall not have any effect for purposes of interpretation or construction of the terms of this Agreement. Section 10.12. Complete and Controlling Agreement. This Agreement, the Indenture and the other Related Documents completely set forth the agreements between the Bank and the Commission and supersede all prior agreements, both written and oral, between the Bank and the Commission relating to the matters set forth herein. Section 10.13. Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Commission, the Trustee and the Bank, their successors and assigns, and no other Person (including, without limitation, any owners of the 2009 Series A Bonds) shall have any right, benefit or interest under or because of the existence of this Agreement. Section 10.14. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held or deemed to be or shall in fact be illegal, inoperative or unenforceable, the same shall not affect any other provision or provisions herein contained or render the same invalid, inoperative or unenforceable to any extent whatever. Section 10.15. Patriot Act. The Bank hereby notifies the Commission that pursuant to the requirements of the USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107-56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) (the "Patriot Act"), it is required to obtain, verify and record information that includes the name and address of the Commission and other information that will allow the Bank to identify the Commission in accordance with the Patriot Act. The Commission shall, promptly following a request by the Bank, provide all documentation and other information that the Bank reasonably requests in order to comply with its ongoing obligations under applicable law or regulation, including, without limitation, "know your customer" and anti -money laundering rules and regulations, including the Act, and shall comply with all applicable Bank Secrecy Act ( "BSA ") laws and regulations, as amended. The Commission shall (a) ensure that no person who owns a controlling interest in or otherwise controls the Commission is or shall be listed on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Person List or other similar lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC "), the Department of the Treasury or included in any Executive Orders, that prohibits or limits the Bank from making any advance or extension of credit to the Commission or from otherwise conducting business with the Commission and (b) ensure that the proceeds of the 2009 Series A Bonds shall not be used to violate any of the foreign asset control regulations of OFAC or any enabling statute or Executive Order relating thereto. -57- 119 Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow. -58- 120 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the Effective Date. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Name: Title: THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., acting through its New York Branch By: Name: Title: • • EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF BANK PURCHASE (Optional Tender) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies to The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch (the "Bank'), in accordance with the Standby Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Standby Purchase Agreement" dated as of September 1, 2014, by and between Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Bank (all capitalized terms herein having the meanings ascribed thereto in the Standby Purchase Agreement), that: 1. Notice of a tender of Eligible Bonds for purchase having a Purchase Price of $ , pursuant to Section [22.04] of the Second Supplemental Indenture, has been received of which $ , constitutes principal and $ constitutes accrued interest. 2. Amounts available for the payment of the Purchase Price of such Eligible Bonds is $ of which $ is available to pay principal and of which $ is available to pay accrued interest. 3. The total principal amount requested hereby for the payment of the principal portion of the Purchase Price of Eligible Bonds is $ which amount does not exceed the Available Principal Commitment or the principal amount referred to in paragraph 1 above minus the principal amount referred to in 2 above. 4. The total amount requested hereby to pay the portion of the Purchase Price for Eligible Bonds constituting accrued interest is $ , which amount does not exceed the Available Interest Commitment or the amount of interest referred to in paragraph 1 above minus the amount of interest referred to in paragraph 2 above. 5. Eligible Bonds referred to above having a Purchase Price of $ [the amount in paragraph 3 plus the amount in paragraph 4] are hereby tendered to the Bank for purchase pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement on the date hereof. 6. Upon completion of purchase, the Trustee will [register such 2009 Series A Bonds, or if a 2009 Series A Bond for which notice of tender for purchase pursuant to the Indenture has been given is not delivered, a new 2009 Series A Bond issued in replacement of the undelivered 2009 Series A Bond, in the name of the Bank or if directed in writing by the Bank its nominee or designee on the Bond Register] [in the case of Book Entry Bonds, cooperate with the Bank and DTC to the extent necessary to ensure that the beneficial ownership of such 2009 Series A Bonds shall be credited to the account of the Bank or if directed in A-1 122 writing by the Bank its nominee or designee with DTC] [, and will hold such 2009 Series A Bonds in trust for the benefit of the Bank]. 7. The Purchase Date is , 20 . 8. The Purchase Price for such Eligible Bonds is to be paid to the Trustee as follows: [insert wire transfer instructions] 9. To the best of the Trustee's knowledge, no Ratings Event, Special Event of Default or Suspension Event has occurred and is continuing on the date hereof, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee has executed and delivered this Certificate as of the day of , 20. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By: Name: 'Title: A-2 123 • EXHIBIT B NOTICE OF BANK PURCHASE (Mandatory Tender) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the "Trustee") hereby certifies to The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch (the "Bank"), in accordance with the Standby Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Standby Purchase Agreement"), dated as of September 1, 2014, by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Bank (all capitalized terms herein having the meanings ascribed thereto in the Standby Purchase Agreement), that: 1. Eligible Bonds have been called for Mandatory Tender having a Purchase Price of $ pursuant to Section [22.05] [(a)(1)/(a)(2)/(a)(5)] [Trustee to specify] of the Second Supplemental Indenture, of which $ constitutes principal and $ constitutes accrued interest. 2. Amounts available for the payment of the Purchase Price of such Eligible Bonds is $ of which $ is available to pay principal and of which $ is available to pay accrued interest. 3. The total principal amount requested hereby for the payment of the principal portion of the Purchase Price of Eligible Bonds is $ which amount does not exceed the Available Principal Commitment or the principal amount referred to in paragraph I above minus the principal amount referred to in paragraph 2 above. 4. The total amount requested hereby to pay the portion of the Purchase Price for Eligible Bonds constituting accrued interest is $ , which amount does not exceed the Available Interest Commitment or the amount of interest referred to in paragraph 1 above minus the amount of interest referred to in paragraph 2 above. 5. Eligible Bonds referred to above having a Purchase Price of $ [the amount in paragraph 3 plus the amount in paragraph 4] are hereby tendered to the Bank for purchase pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement on the date hereof. 6. Upon completion of purchase, the Trustee will [register such 2009 Series A Bonds or, if a 2009 Series A Bond subject to Mandatory Tender pursuant to the Indenture is not delivered, a new 2009 Series A Bond issued in replacement of the undelivered 2009 Series A Bond, in the name of the Bank or if directed in writing by the Bank its nominee or designee on the Bond Register] [in the case of Book Entry Bonds, cooperate with the Bank and DTC to the extent necessary to ensure that the beneficial ownership of such 2009 Series A Bonds shall be credited to the account of the Bank or if directed in writing by the Bank its B-1 124 nominee or designee with DTC] [,and will hold such 2009 Series A Bonds in trust for the benefit of the Bank]. 7. The Purchase Date is , 20 . 8. The Purchase Price for such 2009 Series A Bonds is to be paid to the Trustee as follows: [insert wire transfer instructions] 9. To the best of the Trustee's knowledge, no Ratings Event, Special Event of Default or Suspension Event has occurred and is continuing on the date hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee has executed and delivered this Certificate as of the day of 20_ U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By: Name: Title: B-2 125 • • • EXHIBIT C FORM OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF EXPIRATION DATE [Date] The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch Re: Request for Extension of Expiration Date Ladies/Gentlemen: Reference is hereby made to that certain Standby Bond Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), by and between Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") and The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch (the "Bank"). All capitalized terms contained herein which are not specifically defined shall be deemed to have the definitions set forth in the Agreement. The Commission hereby requests, pursuant to Section 10.10(b) of the Agreement, that the Expiration Date for the Commitment Period be extended by [ ] days/[ ] year[s]. Pursuant to Section 10.10(b) of the Agreement, we have enclosed along with this request the following information: 1. The outstanding principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds; 2. The nature of any Ratings Event, Suspension Event or any and all Events of Default and all conditions, events and acts which with notice or lapse of time or both would become a Ratings Event, Suspension Event or an Event of Default; and 3. Any other pertinent information previously requested by the Bank. C-1 126 The Bank is required to notify the Commission, the Trustee and the Remarketing Agent of its decision with respect to this request for extension within forty-five (45) days of the date of receipt hereof. If the Bank fails to notify the Commission of its decision within such 45 day period, the Bank shall be deemed to have rejected such request. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Name: Title: B-2 127 • • • EXHIBIT D FORM OF LETTER FROM TRUSTEE September 1, 2014 The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch Re: DTC and Book Entry Ladies/Gentlemen: Reference is hereby made to that certain Standby Bond Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), by and between Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") and The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch (the "Bank"). All capitalized terms contained herein which are not specifically defined shall be deemed to have the definitions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to Article IV, subparagraph (n) of the Agreement, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the "Trustee") hereby agrees as follows: 1. The Trustee agrees to act as the agent of the Bank as owner of any Bank Bonds and agreeing to dispose of, and accept instructions with respect to, Bank Bonds only as directed by the Bank. 2. The Trustee agrees that so long as the 2009 Series A Bonds are issued in book -entry form and held by the Trustee as custodian of DTC as part of DTC's fast automated transfer program ( "FAST Eligible Bond"), concurrently with the Trustee's receipt of the purchase price for each purchase of 2009 Series A Bonds by the Bank hereunder, the Trustee, as a participant of DTC (or any other successor securities depository) or an eligible transfer agent, shall (A) credit the DTC account designated by the Bank as its account in which to hold Bank Bonds purchased by it (each, the "Bank Book -Entry Account") by the principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds purchased under the Agreement by the Bank using the Bank Bond CUSIP number for such 2009 Series A Bonds set forth below; and (B) debit the book -entry account of DTC for the 2009 Series A Bonds (thereby reducing the principal balance of the global certificate representing the 2009 Series A Bonds) (the "DTC Book -Entry Account") by the principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds purchased hereunder by the Bank. 128 3. The CUSIP number for 2009 Series A Bonds that are Bank Bonds is [769125DQ5]. 4. So long as the 2009 Series A Bonds are FAST Eligible Bonds, upon a remarketing of Bank Bonds in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and the Trustee's receipt from the Remarketing Agent and/or the Commission of the amounts set forth in Section 2.3(a) of the Agreement, the Trustee, as a participant of DTC (or any other successor securities depository) or an eligible transfer agent, shall (A). debit the Bank Book -Entry Account of the Bank by the principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds so remarketed; and (B) credit the DTC Book -Entry Account for such 2009 Series A Bonds (thereby increasing the principal balance of the global certificate representing such 2009 Series A Bonds) by the principal amount of the 2009 Series A Bonds so remarketed. 5 The Trustee also hereby acknowledges that it is familiar with, and in compliance with, the procedures and requirements set forth in a notice (the "DTC-VRDO Notice") from DTC, dated April 4, 2008, respecting "Variable Rate Demand Obligations ("VRDO ") Failed Remarketings and Issuance of Bank Bonds", as amended by DTC Notice number B3488-08 dated May 15, 2008, and agrees that, with respect to any and all Bank Bonds, it will follow the procedures and requirements set forth in the DTC-VRDO Notice, as the same may be amended from time to time. 6. The Trustee agrees that, following any amendment of the DTC-VRDO Notice, should the procedures and requirements therein become inconsistent with any aspect of the provisions of the Indenture, the Trustee shall promptly negotiate in good faith and consent to amendments as necessary to eliminate such inconsistency. 7. The Trustee acknowledges and agrees to perform its obligations under and to act in strict accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Very truly yours, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, solely in its capacity as Trustee and not in its individual capacity By: Name: Title: -2- • 129 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2014 State Route 91 Implementation Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2014 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2002, AB 1010 authored by former Assemblyman Lou Correa allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise from the California Private Transportation Company. The purchase agreement was completed in January 2003, at a cost of $207.5 million. AB 1010 also eliminated the existing non -compete clause in the franchise agreement that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. SB 1316 passed in August 2008, authorizing the Commission to impose tolls for 50 years on transportation facilities on its portion of SR-91, and authorized toll revenues to be used for constructing and operating toll facilities on SR-91 in Riverside County. The purchase of the 91 Express Lanes and the elimination of the non -compete clause allowed much needed improvements to be planned and implemented within the SR-91 corridor. Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, the Commission and OCTA have been coordinating these improvements. SB 1316 required creation of a new advisory committee with specific responsibilities appointed by board members from the Commission and OCTA. SB 1316 also required the continuation of annual updates of an implementation plan of SR-91 improvements for the Legislature. As spelled out in the legislation, the 2014 State Route 91 Implementation Plan was completed by OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and the Commission, and details proposed projects and completion schedules for transportation improvements to Metrolink, express bus, freeways and interchanges, new east -west highway corridors, and high-speed rail. Attachment: 2014 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Agenda Item 9B 130 acTn 2014 State Route 91 Implementation Plan _ *� r TABLE OF CONTENTS • TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: 2014 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2016 g, PROJECTS BY YEAR 2025 12 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2035 18 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A - CONCEPTS BY POST-2035 22 SECTION 4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECTEXHIBITS 26 SECTION 5: REFERENCES 31 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN j 132 • SECTION 1: • 2014 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE INTRODUCTION Previous law authorized the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in California. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Orange County. The four -lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of State Route 91 (SR-91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County line and State Route 55 (SR-55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehicle on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users tens of millions of hours of commuting time (over 50 million hours since 2003). While the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the SR-91 corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the California Private Transportation Company (CPTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies from adding transportation capacity or operational improvements to the SR-91 corridor through the year 2030 from Interstate 15 (1-15) in Riverside County to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties border. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. Recognizing the need to eliminate the non -compete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) (AB 1010) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much - needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers who use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Orange Counties each day. The bill allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and eliminate the existing clause that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed on January 3, 2003, placing the road in public hands at a cost of $207.5 million. With the elimination of the non -compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by OCTA, Orange County and Riverside County public officials and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) (SB 1316) was signed into law in September 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. SB 1316 also requires OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and RCTC, to issue an annual SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) and a proposed completion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR-57) to 1-15. The Plans prior to adoption of SB 1316 included a westerly project limit of SR-55. The Plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential excess toll revenue and other funds. This 2014 Plan is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Plan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2013 report, which was a major update of the previous annual Implementation Plans. This year's update includes projects that were identified in the 2006 Riverside County Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes from the Orange/Riverside County line to 1-15, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and the Renewed Measure M program that provides funding for transportation projects in Orange County. The 2014 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, time frames for project packages to improve mobility on SR-91, and are listed based on a logical sequence for implementation. Project descriptions include conceptual 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 133 lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estimates (in 2014 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This Plan will provide OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans with a framework to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual Plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the Plan. SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segment of SR-91 from west of the junction of SR-57 and SR-91 in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, to east of the junction of SR-91 and 1-15 in the City of _Corona in Riverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and includes approximately 12.7 miles within Orange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Riverside County. Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic conditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carrying capacity of the facility is inadequate to accommodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is defined as a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/mile. The results also indicate that there are several physical constraints that generate unacceptable traffic queues. The following list summarizes the deficiencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: ❖ Heavy traffic volumes from 1-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91. The weaving and merging condition is complicated by the close proximity of the Westbound (WB) Main Street off -ramp. ❖ High demand from several on -ramps within the eastern segment exacerbates traffic conditions during peak hours. ❖ High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. ❖ One of the two EB lanes from The Eastern Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) is dropped at the merge to State Route 91 (SR-91), causing additional congestion in the EB direction. • Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing WB and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. • SR-55 merges with SR-91. An EB lane on SR-91 is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at ImperialHighway creating a weave condition. ❖ WB SR-91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR-55, which contributes to mainline congestion. This drop also occurs on the left-hand side of SR-91 as opposed to the typical right-hand connector exit. • High demand from Weir Canyon Road, Imperial Highway and Lakeview Avenue increases delay during the peak hours. • WB traffic entering SR-91 at Lakeview Avenue to southbound (SB) SR-55 contributes to mainline congestion by weaving through three lanes on WB SR-91. PROJECT SUMMARY Many of the projects and concepts identified in this 2014 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS as well as through subsequent project development. Table 1 summarizes the various pending, potential concepts, and completed projects in the 2014 Plan, and they are outlined below by implementation/construction schedule (see Section 2 for detailed pending projects, Section 3 Appendix A for concept project summaries, and Section 4 Appendix B for completed project summaries): • The first set of projects is anticipated to be completed by 2016 and includes two improvements at a total cost of approximately $99.2 million. The projects include the Metrolink short-term expansion plan and a new SR-91 WB auxiliary lane at Tustin Avenue. These projects are in the process of final design, construction, or procurement and implementation, as noted in the project summaries. • Five projects for implementation by 2025 include the Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 • • • 134 • • east of Green River Rd, add collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at 1-15/SR- 91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and provide system/local interchange improvements; a State Route 241 (SR-241)/91 Express Lanes connector; Express Bus improvements; interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91; and SR-91 widening improvements between SR-57 and SR-55. OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans has initiated preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Some of the 2025 projects are funded and underway in various stages of project development. Projects for implementation by 2025 would cost approximately from $1.9 billion to $2.16 billion. ❖ Projects for implementation by'2035 focus on longer -lead time projects and include: a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; a significant expansion of Metrolink service; and the Ultimate SR-91 CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15. Long-range concepts for potential implementation by Post-2035 in Appendix A include an elevated 4- lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15, the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail, and the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241/SR- 133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B). These three multi -billion dollar potential concepts require a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. In some cases, these concepts may include previous projects as components, such that all concepts within this summary may not be implemented. Traffic Analysis For the 2014 Plan, the traffic analysis for major SR-91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2013 Plan. This analysis used the latest freeway operations r • !CA 'InjjlgNiq,Fnijkiu, Iicie 1 ■ IllegliiMOOMMNogine IOW alum • Idwaremoalle 111100111 11# lS 010110111 Of AMMO IOW44,11. Nib Pa Wei WM.11 ,b° Obi aris hi mom a1Me1Mrmimi ayeNo tiamies10041110 61.1 iiiiimr[rlosl+wlmilliwes414,- was Otallniksp a flOOPISO 11111,010 �rw■1M�r1/ #fie+ dAffloi .--10 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 135 software model available from UC Berkeley and traffic data calibrated to reflect new traffic patterns since the 2013 Plan. This freeway operations model provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists compared to traditional travel demand models. The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models. This approach is especially important given high SR-91 traffic volumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic. For example, a minor freeway merging area can cause many vehicles to slow, cascading delay through the traffic stream, and suddenly both speed and volume rapidly decrease for major segments of the freeway. The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for WB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the following major capacity enhancing projects: ❖ . New SR-91 WB/EB lanes from SR-71 to 1-15 by 2017 (Initial CIP, Project 3). ❖ SR-241/91 Express Lanes connector with lanes to Coal Canyon on SR-91 by 2018 (Project 4). ❖ SR-91 EB lane between SR-57 and SR-55 by 2025 (Project 7). • New SR-91 WB/EB lanes, various segments, from SR-241 to 1-15 by 2035 (Ultimate CIP, Project 10). The WB morning (a.m.) traffic analysis results indicate that for the year 2016 forecasts, travel times in Riverside and Orange Counties are anticipated to improve slightly (by about 6 minutes), though with bottlenecks anticipated at the Orange -Riverside County line and at the SR-55 interchange. A minor bottleneck is shown at the SR-241 interchange. The main bottlenecks in Riverside County have decreased because of the completion of proposed projects, though some congestion is still forecasted. In the year 2025 forecast, WB bottlenecks occur at Main Street, the Orange -Riverside County line, at the SR-241 interchange, and at the SR-55 interchange which results in an increase in travel time, mostly within Riverside County from about 15 minutes in 2016 to approximately 45 minutes in 2025. Assuming Corridor A and the ICE are not constructed by 2035, bottlenecks appear at Main Street, just east of the SR-71 interchange, at the Orange - Riverside County line, at the SR-241 interchange, and at the SR-55 interchange. With completion of the ultimate CIP project, Riverside County travel times improve dramatically with reduction to near 2016 levels. For all forecast horizon years, travel times in Orange County remain relatively unchanged between Existing (2012) and 2035. OCTA has initiated a study to address the operation aspects at the WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 movement as well explore multi -modal opportunities on or adjacent to the SR-91 corridor that would relieve congestion. The EB evening (p.m.) traffic analysis indicates that for the year 2016 forecasts, bottlenecks are shown just before the SR-55 interchange, at the Orange -Riverside County line, and at Lincoln Avenue, resulting in increased corridor travel times of approximately 25 minutes. In the year 2025 forecast, EB bottlenecks are still shown west of the SR-55 interchange and at the Orange -Riverside County line. The bottleneck at Lincoln Avenue and queuing in Riverside County have largely decreased because of the completion of proposed projects, though some congestion is still forecasted, but corridor travel times are forecast to be less than ,existing conditions. For the 2035 horizon year, bottlenecks appear at SR-55, at the SR-241 interchange, and at Lincoln Avenue. The 2035 Riverside County travel times remain consistently low for EB SR-91 in Riverside County. Figures 1-1 and 1-2 below show the travel times by horizon year. 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • • 136 • • Figure 1-1— Mainline Westbound SR-91 from 1-15 to SR-57 A.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time Mainline Westbound SR-91 From 1-15 to SR-57 AM Peak Hour Average Travel Time (in Minutes) Existing (2012) 2016 2025 ® Orange County O Riverside County 2035 Figure 1-2— Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to 1-15 P.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to 1-15 PM Peak Hour Average Travel Time (in Minutes) Existing (2012) 2016 2025 ® Orange County ElRiverside County 2035 PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan was approved. The 2014 Plan includes select completed project exhibits as a historical reference, see Section 4 Appendix B. Completed Construction/Improvement Projects As of June 2014, the following physical improvements have been constructed/implemented: Repave and seal pavement surfaces, restripe, and replace raised channelizers on the 91 Express Lanes. 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 5 137 EB SR-91 restripe and median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR-71 to the Serfas Club Drive off -ramp. ❖ WB auxiliary lane extension between the County line and SR-241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County line to SR-241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehicle progression. • WB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR-71 and the County line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR-71 & SR-241. ❖ Express Bus improvements are implemented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Coast Metro route and Village at Orange to Riverside/Corona service. • Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were improved, lanes were re -striped, illumination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. ❖ Green River Road overcrossing replacement (See Section 4). ❖ Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station (See Section 4). ❖ EB SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 (See Section 4). ❖ New SR-91 WB/EB travel lanes between SR-55 and SR-241 (See Section 4). These projects provide enhanced freeway capacity and improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of SR-91. The completed EB SR-91 lane addition project from SR- 241 to SR-71 (See Section 4) has greatly enhanced highway operations. This accounts for some of the improvement in existing EB p.m, peak hour travel time from approximately 70+ minutes in 2010 to approximately 50 minutes in 2012 (for the baseline travel time). In addition, there are two projects that are currently in the construction phase that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SARM) improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved Prado Dam (near SR-71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps' project, existing riverbanks are being improved due to the increased capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) compared to the previous facility capacity of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segment of the Santa Ana River to be improved is Reach 9 Phase 2A, which includes areas along SR-91 from just east of the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing to SR-71. SR-91 project design teams have coordinated with the Corps, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 by relocating the Santa Ana River. This will greatly enhance the ability of Caltrans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps SARM Reach 9 improvements were under construction as of September 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "stimulus" funding and were largely completed by June 2014. The other project with a direct impact to SR-91 is the $120 million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SARI line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and is in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI line outside of the floodplain, which is immediately adjacent to ' SR-91, highway R/W was relinquished to the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the OCFCD, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate planned SR-91 improvements within the remaining State R/W subsequent to relinquishment. This project is currently in the construction phase and is scheduled to be completed by mid-2014. Completed Designs and other Reports In addition to the physical improvements in the corridor, there are various project development phase documents (Feasibility Reports, Studies, PSR, PA/ED, or PS&E) that are completed, or are in draft form and anticipated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide improved mobility. These documents include (also see Section 5): MIS — Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). Project Study Report "On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County" (October 2006). 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6 • • 138 • • • Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). • Project Study Report for SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (December 2006). • RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan (December 2006). ❖ SR-91 Feasibility Study from SR-57 to SR-55 (June 2009). ❖ SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study (December 2009). ❖ Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report (August 2010). • Renewed Measure M Early Action Plan, approved August 2007 and subsequently renamed as the Capital Action Plan (April 2011). ❖ PSR-PDS for SR-241/SR-91 Connector (January 2012). ❖ PS&E for Initial SR-91 CIP Project (2014). Updates from the 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan In addition to the improvements and progress noted above, the following items that were included in the 2013 SR-91 Implementation Plan have been modified for the 2014 Plan update: ❖ Project schedules have been revised within the horizon year timelines. The 2015 horizon year is updated to 2016. ❖ Various project descriptions, costs, and schedules have been updated from the 2013 Plan based on continued project development. ❖ Projects that were identified for implementation by Post-2035 are now defined as Concepts by Post- 2035 and are located in Appendix A. ICE STATUS SUMMARY The ICE concept (see Concept #A-3) was conceived as part of the MIS and was established as part of a suite of projects to support future peak demand volumes between Riverside and Orange Counties. ICE was further 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN evaluated in 2009 for financial and geotechnical feasibility. Seven (7) primary feasibility issues were considered: ❖ Geologic, hydrogeologic/hydrologic, and geotechnical conditions ❖ Corridor concepts (full tunnel and partial tunnel/partial surface road) ❖ Tunnel configuration ❖ Tunnel excavation and support methods ❖ Tunnel systems (e.g. ventilation, emergency fire system, operation building, toll system, etc.) ❖ Construction considerations ❖ Construction, Operation & Maintenance (0&M) costs At the conclusion of the financial and geotechnical feasibility study in 2010, the Riverside -Orange Corridor Authority Board (ROCA) directed staff to shelve the project due to its high construction cost and the difficult economic climate, and to reevaluate the concept on an annual basis during the preparation of the SR-91 Implementation Plan. The National Forest Service has continued monitoring of the ground water level along the preliminary alignment of the tunnel and has not found any significant changes since 2010. ,The technological ability to construct the large -diameter tunnels is currently available; however, the cost of tunnel boring machines (TBM) required to construct this project has not been reduced significantly. In general, no significant changes to the seven feasibility issues considered for the ICE concept have occurred over the last four years. Conclusion An assessment of current economic conditions, lack of state and federal transportation funding; and the high construction cost is hampering the ability of OCTA and RCTC to implement this concept. Until considerable advancements are made in regards to efficient and affordable tunneling technology, and more state and federal funding are made available, the concept will remain a challenge to implement. 139 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OVERVIEW The 2014 Plan describes projects, implementation schedules, key consideration, benefits, and costs (in 2014 dollars, or as noted) for major projects and concepts through Post-2035. Most of the projects and concepts identified in this Implementation Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS and subsequent updates. The schedules for implementation of the packages of projects include 2016, 2025, and 2035. The 2016 projects are capable of being implemented through the project development process with minimal to moderate environmental constraints. Some of the longer -range projects for 2025 and 2035 require more significant planning and environmental assessment prior to design. Each of the project or concept improvements includes an estimate of project schedules. It is important to note that implementing various time saving measures, such as design -build or contractor incentives for early completion, may potentially reduce project schedules. The implementation phases are defined as follows; ❖ Conceptual Engineering = Pre -Project Study Report (Pre-PSR) — Conceptual planning and engineering for project scoping and feasibility prior to initiating the PSR phase. •:• Preliminary Engineering = Project Study Report (PSR) — Conceptual planning and engineering phase that allows for programming of funds. ❖ Environmental = Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) — The detailed concept design that provides environmental clearance for the project and programs for final design and right of way acquisition. The duration for this phase is typically 2-3 years. •:• Design = Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) — Provide detailed design to contractors for construction bidding and implementation. ❖ Construction = The project has completed construction and will provide congestion relief to motorists: The intent of these Implementation Plan project packages is to provide an action list for OCTA, ROTC and Caltrans to pursue in the project development process or for initiating further studies. Figure 2-1— SR-91 Project Study Area from SR-57 to 1-15 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 140 • PROJECTS BY YEAR ZO 1 6 The first set of projects will be completed by 2016 and includes two (2) improvements at a total cost of approximately $99.2 million (in 2014 dollars, or as noted). The two projects include the Metrolink short-term expansion plan and the SR-91 WB lane at Tustin Avenue. Further details for each of the projects are included following the summary below. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 1 Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan (2014) 54 2 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue (2016) 45.2 SUBTOTAL 99.2 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 141 Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan Project No: 1 Anticipated Completion: 2014 Project Cost Estimate" Stations Equipment Total OCTA Costs Project Schedule To be completed by 2014 Costs from OCTA $ 27,000,000 $ 27,000,000 $ 54,000,000 planned short-term expansion is necessary make the current service more convenient. Key Considerations Capital costs necessary for this expansion include the purchase of engines and coaches to operate the new service as well as a new station in the City of Placentia. OCTA costs are estimated at $54 million. The long-term plan (by 2030) adds more service and requires a significant capital investment. The City of Anaheim is also proposing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second track and platform to be implemented in Fall 2017 as part of the long-term plan. The City of Placentia is currently in the environmental phase for a new Metrolink commuter rail passenger station and parking lot to be constructed by mid-2017 as part of the long-term plan. Coordination has been ongoing .with the Metrolink extension studies (see also Project #9 for long-term details). Benefits Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), plans a short-term expansion of train service from the Inland Empire to Orange County. Additional trains are planned on the Inland Empire - Orange County (IEOC) Line that currently runs between San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties as well as the "91 Line" that goes from the Inland Empire to Los Angeles via Orange County, paralleling SR-91. Currently, there are sixteen (16) daily trains that rtin on the 1E0C Line and nine (9) trains running on the 91 Line for a total of 25 daily trains. The short-term expansion adds two (2) additional 1E0C trains and four (4) additional 91 Line trains by 2014 for a total of 31 daily trains, subject to negotiations, with Burlington Northern Sarita.Fe (BNSF), ROTC, and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). The to accommodate population and employment growth in the region and will Enables development of expanded Metrolink Service and improves efficiency, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status SCRRA equipment procurement is complete with the Rotem Company for the purchase of trailer and cab cars, and also with MotivePower, Inc. for locomotives. DAILY TRAINS Year2012 25 Year 2014: 31 Twins , Ce / South " .e County DAILY MINS Year 2012: 16 Year 2014: 20 ✓ New train engines and coaches ✓ $54 million 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 10 142 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue Project No: 2 Anticipated Completion: 2016 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 23,100,000 $ 15,419,000 $ 6,717,000 $ 45,236,000 Completed Completed Completed 2014-2016 Schedule is derived from April 2012 OCTA Capital Action plan. Costs are from 2012 Caltrans Estimate at Completion. LEGEND son Existing Highway amio Interchange/Ramp toillue County Line HOV or HOT Lane Existing Lane i1•IIII Proposed improvement Lane Project Description The project will add a westbound (WB) auxiliary lane on SR-91 beginning at the northbound (NB) SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector through the Tustin Avenue interchange. Key Considerations Build Alternative 3 was selected from the Project Study Report (PSR), On Westbound (WB) SR-91 Auxiliary Lane from the Northbound (NB) SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue interchange, and requires additional right-of-way. City of Anaheim utilities are within close proximity of the proposed widening section. Widening of the Santa Ana River bridge is required. Coordination with the City of Anaheim occurred for widening of Tustin Avenue and the WB SR-91 Off -Ramp that was completed in early 2011. Benefits The project would reduce or eliminate operational problems and deficiencies on this section of WB SR-91 including weaving and merging maneuvers. This project would also address choke -point conditions, which are caused primarily by extensive weaving between the NB SR-55 to. WB SR-91 connector and the WB SR-91 off -ramp to Tustin Avenue. Current Status Preliminary engineering was completed and approved by Caltrans. The environmental phase was completed in November 2010, and design was completed in mid-2013. Construction was initiated in February 2014. The project received $14M from the Proposition 1B State -Local Partnership Program (SLPP), $14M from Measure M, with the balance from Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. Tustin Av Lakeview Av On On 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 11 143 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2025 Projects for implementation by 2025 include the Initial Phase SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) that includes widening SR-91 by one general purpose (GP) lane in each direction east of Green River Rd, collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at I-15/SR-91, extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and system interchange improvements; Express Bus improvements; the SR-241/91 Express Lanes direct connector; the interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91; and SR-91 improvements between SR-57 and SR-55. OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans have initiated preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. However, the SR-91 CIP Initial Phase (Project #3) is currently under construction through a Design -Build contract. Projects for implementation by 2025 are expected to cost approximately $1.9 billion to $2.16 billion (in 2014 dollars, or as noted). Some of these projects may become components of 2035 projects. Project No. 3 Project Summary (Implementation Year) Initial Phase CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of Green River Rd, CD Roads and I- 15/SR-91:Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes tot-15 and System/Local Interchange Improvements;(2017) Cost ($M) 1,312 4 SR-241/91'Express Lanes Connector (2018) 180 5 Express Bus Improvements Between Orange County and Riverside County (2020) 9.5 6 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements (2020) 122.7 7 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 (2025) 278-532 SUBTOTAL 1,902 — 2,156 Figure 2-3 — Summary of Projects for Implementation By 202.9 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 12 144 • • • Initial Phase CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP lane In Each Direction East of Green River Road, CD Roads and 1-15/SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System ! Local Interchange Improvements Project No: 3 Anticipated Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate' Total Capital Cost $ 1,096,000,000 Support Cost $ 116,000,000 Total Project Cost $ 1,312,000,000 Project Schedule" Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed Completed 2013-2017 Cost obtained for Initial Phase is from RCTC and is 2013 dollars " Schedule for Inital Phase; subsequent phase for Ultimate Project anticipated in 2035 (see Project #10) LEGEND .+� Existing Highway +r. InteruhangeiRamp County Line HOY or HOT Lane Existing Lane BM Proposed Improvement Lane ME CD Road ▪ Auxaiaiy Lane Braided Connector Off Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, recommended the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, and the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (now part of Project #6) and at the I-15/SR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC)10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EB/W8)/1-15 (S8/NB) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the I-151SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15/Cajalco Road, and northerly to I-15/Hidden Valley Parkway. An Express Lanes ingress/egress lane is also planned near the County Line. Due to current economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase with reduced improvements to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed in 2035. The following is a summary of the deferred ultimate improvements (Project #10): SR-91/1-15 median North Direct Connector and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway; 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road; general purpose lanes and Express Lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street; and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to tontine to be coordinated with the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #6) and the SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #4), which includes three alternatives for further study that will need to be coordinated with the proposed project. Continued coordination will be required with the Santa Ana Regional interceptor (SARI) sewer line relocation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Santa Ana River bank -protection projects (Reach 9 Phase 2A and 28). Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate C1P projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street, along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south, and to Hidden VaHey Parkway to the north. Traffic operation will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in Fall 2012. A Design -Build contractor was selected in May 2013 and construction activities began in early 2014 for the Initial Phase. Gypsum Canyon Rd Off On Off n - Ah_.---_— .a. Coal Canyon County Line Green River Rd WLC On Otl on 4 Ingress/Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes by restriping On Off Auto Center Dr On Off n Off Series Club Dr Maple St Lincoln Av Main St On' Off' rxr On Off On On Off On On OW On. On Off On Oa Off 3-Lane CD Road Connector from Main St EB on -ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp Additional lane by —\ restripe of existing lanes 1 1 l li Off ' On Off On On On From From 5B NB 1-15 1-15 HOV/HOT lanes to 1-15/Ontario Av 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 145 13 McKinley St Pierce St SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector Project No: 4 Anticipated Completion: 2018 Project Cost Estimate" Total Project Cost $ 180,000,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed 2012-2016 2016-2018 Assumes a 2-lane connector, extending as far as Coal Canyon. Costs from State Route 241 / 91 Connector Fact Sheet (10/28/2013). Project Description The SR-241/91 Express Lanes connector will cant' northbound (NB) SR-241 traffic to eastbound (EB) 91 Express Lanes and cant' westbound (WB) 91 Express Lanes traffic to southbound (SB) SR-241. Outside widening would be required mainly on the south side of SR-91 for realignment of EB lanes up to the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing. Key Considerations This project was originally permitted as a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) r connector into the SR-91 HOV lane. With the implementation of the 91 Express Lanes, the project will need to carefully coordinate the traffic operations and tolling policies that will result with the convergence of the SR-241 toll road, the existing OCTA 91 Express Lanes, and the proposed extension of the 91 Express Lanes by RCTC. The project will follow the SR-91 CIP (Project #3) in its implementation and will need to be designed accordingly. Continuous operations of the 91 Express Lanes will be a key consideration for this project. Corridor A (Concept #A-1) will need to be compatible with this SR-241/91 Express Lanes connector project. The preliminary analysis calls for the SR-91 center median to be widened to the south to make room for a two lane (one in each direction) direct connector. The project would tie into the SR-91 CIP improvements at Coal Canyon. Benefits The project will complete the current toll system between the future and existing 91 Express Lanes and the SR-241 Eastern Transportation Corridor System. The project improves access to SR-241 and South County for traffic that does not currently utilize the 91 Express Lanes, which also improves WB SR-91 by eliminating the need for HOV and Express Lane users to weave across four general purpose lanes to use the existing SB SR-241 connector. it helps to alleviate congestion on NB SR-241 and EB SR-91 by allowing SR-241 users to bypass the existing EB SR-91 general purpose connector. The project will also provide a benefit to the Central County MIS area. Current Status Preliminary engineering concepts for a SR-241 /91 Express Lanes direct connector have been developed by Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) and Ca!trans. The 91 Express Lanes Extension and SR-241 Connector Feasibility Study was completed in March 2009 and was initiated to evaluate the various alternatives. An expanded alternative would connect to SR-71 or extend the ingress/egress further east. A Project Study Report was initiated in January 2011 and was completed by January 2012. The Project Report and Environmental Document is anticipated to be competed by mid-2016. �. Gypsum Canyon Off On Off Off On --�On Coal Canyon WLC County Line Ingress/Egress lanes shown within Express Lanes by restriping (Project #3) LEGEND ammo Existing Highway r w. Interchange/Ramp mown' County Line ftWela HOV or HOT Lane 7167..1 Existing Lane NMI Proposed Improvement Lane R� Project #3 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 14 146 Express Bus Improvements Between Orange County and Riverside County Project No: 5 Anticipated Completion: 2020 Project Cost Estimate* Total Capital Cost Total Annual Operating Cost $ 9,500,000 $1,000,000 Project Schedule Riverside/Corona to La Sierra FY 2019/2020 Metrolink Station to Irvine Business Conplex/UCI Riverside/Corona to North FY 2019/2020 East Anaheim and CSUF Riverside/Corona to FY 2019/2020 Anaheim Resort Village at Orange to Existing (RTA 216) Riverside/Corona Riverside/Corona to Implemented Fall 2006 South Coast Metro (RTA 216) * Costs from OCTA (2010 dollars) Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), plans an extensive expansion of Express Bus service between Riverside and Orange counties. Commuters lack direct transit connections to many Orange County employment centers, and new Express Bus service will provide connections to major employment centers in Anaheim, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, and Irvine. Three new Express Bus routes are planned from Riverside County to the Anaheim Canyon Business Center and California State University Fullerton; Anaheim Civic Center, Western Medical Center, and Anaheim Resort; and Irvine Business Complex and University of California, Irvine (UCI). Routes would run every 30 to 45 minutes in the peak period, and service will be tailored to match demand. Implementation began in Fall 2006 with the Riverside County to Hutton Centre and South Coast Metro route. The other routes are planned for implementation by Fiscal Year 2019/2020 contingent on future budget authority. Upon completion of the proposed 91 Express Lanes, RCTC expects to nearly double Express Bus service on SR-91. Currently, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and OCTA operate 21 bus trips per day on SR-91 and RCTC envisions adding 20 additional trips, bringing the total to 41 daily trips. Service duration for this expansion will increase by 11,500 hours per year and will be served by five new transit coaches to be procured specifically for this service. Key Considerations Operating costs are estimated at $1,000,000 each year. Costs are shared by Orange and Riverside counties. Benefits Development of Express Bus services will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status A cooperative agreement covering the Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro service with Riverside County has been developed. The Riverside County to South Coast Metro Express Bus route is currently operating. Expansion of the program is dependent upon available operating funds and future financial commitments with Riverside County. The implementation dates may change based on funding availability. 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15 147 SR-711SR-91 Interchange Improvements Project No: 6 Anticipated Completion: 2020 Project Cost Estimate` Total Project Cost $ 122,658,009 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed Completed 2013-2020 " Cost obtained from preliminary engineer's cost estimate (2011 dollars) m LEGEND �s Existing Highway �. Interchange/Ramp meowmeowCounty Line geigg HOV or HOT lane Existing Lane MR Proposed Improvement Lane Its Auxiliary Lane 111,7..2, Project tt3 Improvements Project Description The current project includes a new two-lane direct connector flyover from eastbound (EB) SR-91 to northbound (NB) SR-71 and modifications to the existing Green River Road EB SR-91 On -Ramp. Key Considerations Project improvements must be coordinated with the following projects: the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (CIP) (Project#3 and #10) and the SR-241191 Express Lanes Connector (Project #4). The Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement was completed in March 2009 (see Appendix B Project No. B-1) and consisted of replacing the previously existing Green River Road Overcrossing with a new six -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate widening of SR-91 by Projects #3, #4, and #10. The SR-91 CIP (Project #3 and #10) project has selected a design -build team that began design in Summer 2913. A Project Study Report for the SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #4) was inffiated in January 2011 with three alternatives being evaluated. Close coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish and Wildlife will also be required as the connector crosses the Santa Ana River below the Prado Dam, In addition, implementation of Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) within the median of SR-91 will require the need for a three -level crossing of SR-91 and the proposed SR-71 direct flyover connector. Coordination will be required with an at -grade or grade -separated managed lane ingress/egress facility that may be located near the County Boundary as part of the SR-91 CIP (Project #3 and #10). Benefits The project will provide a new direct connector improvement from EB SR-91 to NB SR-71, replacing the geometric choke point created try the existing connector. The project will also improve traffic operations and operational efficiency by eliminating or minimizing weaving conflicts through the use of auxiliary lanes. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in June 2011. Final design is underway and is anticipated to be complete in mid-2014. Ingress/Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes by restriping by Project #3 On � k� Gypsum Canyon Rd o On Off On Orr Lane shown is for Project #3---‘,„ Coal Canyon County Line Green River Rd WLC on Lanes shown are for the SR-71/SR-91 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR-71, and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 Auto Center Dr (TYPO Off On \ Off Off On Off On Serfas Club Dr Lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On -Ramp 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • 148 • 16 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 Project No: 7 Anticipated Completion: 2025 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost R/W Cost Support Cost TBD TBD TBD Management & Contingency TBD Total Project Cost, Low* $ 278,000,000 Total Project Cost, High* $ 532,000,000 Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed 2011-2014 2014-2017 2018-2021 2021-2025 * Project Costs from draft SR-91 PSR/PDS (2011 dollars). Cost Range is for reduced shoulder alternative (low) and full standard alternative (high). Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp HOV or HOT Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Project #2 Improvements State College Blvd On Off On Off On Off SR-57 Off EB SR-91 at Kraemer Blvd - interchange improvements Project Description Improve the SR-57/SR-91 interchange complex, including nearby local interchanges, as well as adding freeway capacity between SR-55 and SR-57. Some improvements to NB SR-57 may be considered and will be further analyzed during the Environmental phase. Specific improvements will be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. The improvements shown are from the concepts developed by the SR-91 Project Study Report - Project Development Support from SR-57 to S R-55. Key Considerations The proposed project improvements on WB and eastbound (EB) SR-91 betvveen SR-57 and SIR-55 may require right-of-way acquisition. Coordination with the SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue improvements (Project #2) will be required. Benefits The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 include, among other features, adding one EB general purpose lane to achieve lane balancing. The project improvement will alleviate congestion and reduce delay. Current Status The project improvement for EB SR-91 widening and for improvements to SR-57/SR-91 and SR-55/SR-91 were studied by the SR-91 Feasibility Study, which was completed in June 2009. Preliminary engineering began in August 2011 and will be completed by mid-2014. The proposed improvements are included in the Measure M2 program. Lane shown is for Project #2 Lakeview Av Kraemer Blvd On Off On Off On Off Glassell St Tustin Av On On Off Off On Off 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 149 17 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2035 Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer -lead time projects and include: a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; a significant expansion of Metrolink service and station improvements; and the Ultimate SR-91 CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, extension of Express Lanes on 1-15, and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 8 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements (Post-2025) 76.8 9 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements (2030) 335 10 Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct TBD, North Connector, Extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 (2035) SUBTOTAL 412+ Figure 2-4 — Summary of Projects for Implementation by 2035 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 18 150 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements Project No: 8 Anticipated Completion: Post-2025 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction ,$ 67,800,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 76,800,000 Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD * Costs from Feasibility Study (2009 dollars). R/W cost is undetermined at this time. Cost does not include potential impact to Santa Ana River. t LEGEND vamp Existing Highway Proposed Interchange/Ramp ammo Interchange/Ramp HOV or HOT Lane ESZ Existing Lane mil Proposed Improvement Lane a 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Project Description The project would provide a new interchange with SR-91 at Fairmont Boulevard. On- and off -ramps will connect Fairmont Boulevard to eastbound (EB) and westbound (WB) SR-91. The proposed interchange does not include a Fairmont Boulevard connection to Santa Ana Canyon Road to the south. Key Considerations Interchange spacing and weaving issues (to SR-55) need to be evaluated. Widening of SR-91 may be needed to accommodate interchange ramps. Proximity of the Santa Ana River may require that the WB ramp junction be located north of the river. New connection requirements and interchange spacing needs to be considered. Benefits The interchange is expected to relieve congestion at Imperial Highway (SR-90), Lakeview Avenue, and Weir Canyon Road Interchanges. Preliminary traffic modeling shows a 10-15% decrease in volumes at Weir Canyon and SR-90 interchanges with the interchange alternative. Current Status The City of Anaheim completed a conceptual engineering study in December 2009. Multiple alternatives have been developed as part of the conceptual engineering study. Project development is pending funding identification. Off Fairmont Blvd On 19 151 Metrolink Service and Station improvements Project No; 9 Anticipated Completion: 2030 Project Cost Estimate* Total Capital Cost $ 335,000,000 Project Schedule To be completed by * Costs from OCTA Project description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), plans an extensive expansion of train service from the Inland Empire to Orange County. Additional trains are planned on the Inland Empire - Orange County (IEOC) Line that currently runs between San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties as well as the 91 Line that goes from the Inland Empire to Los Angeles via Orange County, paralleling SR-91. Currently, sixteen (16) trains a day run on the IEOC Line and nine (9) trains on the 91 Line. The long-term expansion plan builds on service levels that will be implemented by 2014 (Project #1). The "2014" plan includes two (2) additional IEOC trains and four (4) additional 91 Line trains for a total of 31 trains a day. The long -tern plan adds another eight (8) IEOC trains and twenty (20) 91 Line trains for a total of 59 daily trains. Thi's planned expansion is necessary to accommodate population and employment growth in the region and will make the current service more convenient. Capital improvements necessary for this expansion include a third track on sections of the rail line in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties; new crossovers at critical locations to allow trains to pass one another; new storage tracks in San Bernardino; parking improvements at key stations; and purchase of engines and coaches to operate the new service. The City of Anaheim is proposing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second track and platform to be implemented in Fall 2017. The City of Placentia, in partnership with OCTA, is proposing to construct a new Metrolink commuter rail passenger station and parking lot within the city limits by mid-2017_ Key Considerations The capital program is estimated to cost $335 million, and costs would be shared by the member agencies of SCRRA and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF). Service levels are subject to negotiation with BNSF, RCTC, and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Benefits Enables development of new Metrolink Services, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The proposed implementation of this project is being evaluated based on the current economic climate. DAILY TRAINS Year 2014: 31 Year 2030: 59 DAILY TRAINS Year 2014: 20 Year 2030: 20 ✓ New track and crossovers ✓ Expanded station parking ✓ New train engines and coaches ✓ $335 million 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 20 152 • Ultimate CIP: Witten SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, 1-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, Extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 Project No: 10 Anticipated Completion: 2035 Project Cost Estimate* To Be Determined Project Schedule" Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed Completed TBD Schedule for Ultimate Project anticipated by 2035 LEGEND rirr. Existing Highway •r_ InterchangerRamp �• County Line MIXIM HOV or HOT Lace Existing Lane ENSI Proposed Improvement Lane VIM CD Road (Project 413) amisll Auxiliary Lane Project #3, R4, and 45 Improvements « Braided Connector Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, recommended the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, and the addition of eoliector-distributor (CD) lanes at the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (now part of Project #6) and at the I-15/SR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EB/WB)/1-15 (SB/NB) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-15/SR-91 interchange southerly to I-15/Cajalco Road, and northerly to I-15/Hidden Valley Parkway. Due to current economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase (Project #3), with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed in 2035. The following is a summary of the proposed ultimate improvements: SR-91/1-15 median North Direct Connector and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway; 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajaico Road; SR-91 general purpose lanes from I-15 to Pierce Street; and SR-91 general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71. Ultimate,project widens all SR-91 lanes to full standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71. These Ultimate improvements are the subject of this project. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Initial CIP (Project #3), the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #6), and the SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #4), which includes alternatives for further study that will need to be coordinated with the proposed project. Continued coordination will be required with the Santa Ana Regional blterceptor (SARI) sewer line relocation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers riverbank protection projects (Reach 9 Phase 2A and 2B). Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street and along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operation will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete. The Ultimate Project is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012, Existing bike path will be preserved OR :!"Gypsum Canyon R3`� On OR Off Lanes shown are for the —� SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (Project 744) gli2014SR-91 Implementation Plan • On On Coal Canyon W LC County Line Green River Rd On off OR Lanes shown are for the SR-71/SR-91 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR-71, and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 (Project #6) O r Ultimate project widens ail SR-91 lanes tofu!! standard HOV/HOT lanes to / lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71 I-15/Hidden Valley Pkwy Auto Center Dr Maple St Lincoln Av Main St %(j On. OR nw On OR On On OR On On OR or Serfas Club Dr Lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On -Ramp (Project #6) On OR On OR t On 3-Lane CD Road from Main St EB On -Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp (Project #3) McKinley St Pierce St OR On Off On On On OR On OR From From SB NB I-15 1-15 HOV/HOT lanes to I-15/Cajalco Rd 153 21 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A - CONCEPTS BY POST-2035 Concepts for potential implementation by Post-2035 focus on longer -lead time projects. This multi -billion dollar program may include: an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15; the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail; and the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B). The multi -billion dollar potential concepts include significant environmental constraints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. The Corridor A Concept may incorporate projects being developed in the earlier programs as concept components. Appendix Concept No. Concept Summary (Implementation Year) Cost (PI) A-1 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 (Post-2035) 2,720 A-2 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail (Post-2035) 2,770-3,200 A-3 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (Post-2035) 8,855 SUBTOTAL 14,350-14,780 Figure 3-1— Summary of Concepts for Implementation by Post-2035 2014 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 22 • 154 • Median 2 EB Lanes Shld Elevated 4- ne Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 Concept No: A-1 Anticipated Completion; Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate" Capital Cost" $1,488,000,000 Support Cost (25%) $372,000,000 R/W Cost $860,000,000 Total Project Cost $2,720,000,000 Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD " Capital costs include $160M for environmental mitigation excluding corresponding support cost, which is included in support cost estimate Costs derived from Riverside County - Orange County MIS, January 2006 (2005 dollars) Shld 2 WB Lanes Abbreviations: WB = Westbound EB = Eastbound Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) Cross -Section Concept Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a new 4-lane elevated expressway near or within the Santa Ana Canyon with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241 and 1-15_ The facility may include managed lanes and potential reversible operations. Key Considerations Choice of alignment will be key to determining net capacity increase. Extensive right-of-way (R/W) will be required to implement the improvements if the alignment is not on the SR-91 corridor. If Project #3 or #10 is constructed and a 4-lane elevated facility is proposed within the median of SR-91 through Corona, then extensive managed lane closures would be required during construction (thus temporarily reducing SR-91 capacity during construction). An alternative could be studied for the median Corridor A viaduct along with reduced SR-91 geometric standards to minimize R/W impacts. Also, direct connectors (such as for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) / High Occupancy Toll (HOT) at I-15/SR-91) to/from the median could be precluded by Maglev columns located within the same median area. Caltrans and Maglev highway R/W, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with a Maglev facility were pursued. Additional mitigation costs may be required for improvements to SR-241 and SR-133 as a result of additional Corridor traffic volumes. Corridor A as managed lanes, with potential extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15 (Project #3 and #10), may affect traffic distribution due to "parallel" tolled facilities. Benefits The concept would provide significant congestion relief by allowing vehicles to bypass the at -grade freeway lanes and local arterial interchanges between SR-241 and 1-15. Connections are proposed directly between SR-91, SR-241, and 1-15. Current Status This concept is identified in the Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as part of the Locally Preferred Strategy to improve mobility between Riverside County and Orange County. No project development work is planned at this time 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 23 155 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail Concept No: A 2 Anticipated Completion: 2035 Concept Cost Estimate' Total Capital Cost Low $ 2,770,000,000 Total Capital Cost, High $ 3,200,000,000 Concept Schedule To be determined ' Concept costs from American Magline Group (2012 dollars) Concept Description Proposals for a new super -speed train corridor from Anaheim to Ontario are included in this concept. This concept includes an altemative that would use SR-91 right-of-way, or would be aligned adjacent to SR-91 right-of-way, or could potentially be co -located with the Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) alignment. Another alignment opportunity is being investigated along SR-57. Key Considerations Altemative alignment impacts to SR-91 right-of-way envelope and/or Santa Ana River are undetermined. The choice of alignment will potentially impact MIS Corridor A (Concept #A-tt). Right-of-way (R/W) will be required to implement the improvements. Potential ,considerations for co -locating the Magnetic Levitation (maglev) train adjacent to Corridor A (and also SR-91) include providing a two -column structure with a barrier between the trains and vehicles. Caftans and maglev highway R/W, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with a maglev facility were pursued. See the MIS Corridor A (Project#11) for additional considerations. Coordination with Metrolink improvements (Project ) will be required. Benefits The concept would provide congestion relief by providing a direct high-speed/high-capacity connection with Ontario International Airport for Orange County air passengers and business next -day deliveries. Maglev will make the trip in just 14.5 minutes. Relieves congestion on SR-91 by providing additional capacity in the corridor. Current Status Preliminary design, engineering and Phases 1 and 2 of a Preliminary Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS/EIS) are completed. Congress has approved $45M in SAFETEA-LU for the environmental phase of the project. The Anaheim to Ontario segment is included in the `Constrained" Plan of the Southem Califomia Association of Governments (SLAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) passed in April 2012. Construction funding of up to $7 billion has been identified through a loan commitment from the China Export -Import Bank. LEGEND moo Existhig Highway. +.+ High Speed Rail Repterehtative Alignment REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 156 24 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-24115FR-133 to I-151Cajalco Road Concept No: A-3 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate* Capital Cost $ 7,675,000,000 Support Cost $ 880,000,000 R/W Cost $ 300,000,000 Total Project Cost $ 8,855,000,000 Concept Schedule Geotechnicai Feasibility Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD * Costs derived from the Feasibility Evaluation Report (2009 dollars) Existing Highway iCE (Corridor B) Representative Alignment NOTE: REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY Concept Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a highway and rail facility through the Cleveland National Forest with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241/SR-133 and 1-15/Cajak:o Road. The facility would essentially be a continuation of SR-133 on the west end of the corridor, to 1-15 on the east end. Key Considerations The tunnel concept is technically feasible based on the geotechnical investigation completed in December 2009. The initial project phase would be the construction of one 2-lane highway tunnel and one rail tunnel. The second project phase wauid include construction of a second 2-lane highway tunnel. Additional technical studies and geotechnical borings would be needed to refine the tunnel alignments and grades. Costs associated with the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) tunnels are based on the Feasibility Evaluation Report completed in December 2009_ A financial analysis will be needed for the construction, operations and toll requirements of the ICE tunnels. Benefits The concept would provide significant congestion relief by providing an alternative route between Orange and Riverside counties and would allow vehicles to bypass SR-91 between SR-241 and 1-15. The concept would not disrupt SR-91 traffic during construction and would allow for additional route selection for incident management, emergency evacuation, and for continuity of the highway network by linking SR-133 to 1-15. Current Status On August 27, 2010 the Riverside Orange Corridor Authority Board took action to defer additional study of the ICE concept until such time as financial considerations improve and/or technological advancements warrant reexamination. Review of the concept shall be done annually through the SR-91 Implementation Plan update to determine if any of the major assumptions with regard to financial considerations, private sector interest, or technological advancements have changed to make the tunnel financially viable, (See "ICE status summary" for further discussion). 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 157 25 SECTION4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS The following exhibits represent completed projects from previous Plans since 2006, and are intended to be used as a reference to illustrate the progress made since the inception of the Plan. Note: some projects listed in the Plan as completed (see Section 1, Project Accomplishments) are not included herein since there was no exhibit created or necessary for use with prior Plans (such as for restriping projects, various safety enhancements, minor operational improvements, etc.). Appendix Project No. Project Improvements Constructed B-1 Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement B-2 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure B-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 B-4 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 59, GP Lane in Each Direction March 2009 June 2009 September 2010 December2012 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 26 158 • Green River Road Avercrossing Replacement Appendix Project No: B-1 Actual Completion: March 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost RNd Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 21,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $301,000 $ 24,301,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed Project Schedule Ca!trans Equivalents: Preliminary Engineering = PID Environmental = PA/ED Design = PS&E Abbreviations: CD = Collector Distributor Lane �e FTR = Future HOV = High Occupancy Vehl SHLD = Shoulder 77' 138' Project Description Improvements primarily consist of replacing the existing Green or River Road overcrossing with a ne overcrossing to accommodate f"i'e widen interior spans will accommodat to eight each direction including two HOV lam, Th accommodate two lanes, F `er for auxill distributor roads. En#ran widened to accomm retain its current co ramp intersection constructed w Key Consid existingrriot,of way. wide, 4-span of SR-91. The inline lanes in xterior spans can anes or collector t ramps -will be realigned and e th= brill, yet the interchange will ation_ ii ` nals will be installed at the - d bridge improvements will be Designtterface is r ,., `red with the Eastbound Lane Addition from SR1 to SR-7 ,.SR-711SR-91 interchange Improvements, Movement Project, and SR-241 /SR-91 Con' or cf will improve the level of service at ramp and local et i' rsections at the interchange. improvements will reduce queues that extend into the freeway's general purpose anes, thus contributing to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The project began construction in March 2007 and was completed in March 2009. 138' New Bridge 79' itx,,,lto, rmrmsm irnlirmiroi � i i iii i,�im's c '—A wc" vae l L.are! wu _ 1 wc: wu ism{ . ixaa j uwr, Laes i Ewa; w�i wR i wc; m ! tr I1r j174 IT ita 1r ;f1 try 17e• 1P IC3 12; tt'i taj 1a ; i 1I ', trwi g 10': fZ 31r Iw'i wB EB GREEN RIVER BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION NOTE: All dimensions are approximate 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 27 159 North Main Street Corona Mettrolink Station Parking Structure Appendix Project No: 8.2 Actual Completion: June 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 20,000,000 Support Cost $ 5,000,000 R/W Cost $0 Total Project Cost $ 25,000,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental Completed Design Completed Construction Completed Project Description The project provides a six level partll stalls. The construction is withligthe Metrolink station property in COMM, Key Considerations Proposed improvemen Currently thereare 7 previously able to lot to park and ri permits for added benefit congestion on SR - Benefits ure with 1,065 parking North Main Street within existing right of way. day, 200 more that were iratly ROTC has opened up the vanpools and has issued over 120 use expanded station. This shows an rng„carpooling as well as transit to offset entiy exceeds the capacity at the North. Main na staon. New parking capacity will allow Metrollnk mcreasethereby -diverting _vehide trips from SR-91. u9 n was initiated in January 200$ and was completed in June project was funded with Federal Congestion Management Air Zluality (CMAQ) funds. 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 28 160 Appendix Project No: B-3 Actual Completion: September 2010 Project Cost Estimate Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 41,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 51,200,000 LEGEND Existing Highway owl interchange/Ramp ®� County Line sa° HOV or HOT Lane 'Teri Existing Lane uss Project Improvement Lane lownik Existing Interchange it Completed Completed Completed Completed Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 Project Description The project will provide an addit01161 ea and (EB) lane from the SR-91/SR-241 interchange to SR-71/S 1 interchange and will Widen all EB lanes and shoulders ttgs ndard idths. k� Key Considerations Coordination with the SR-91 i ,jd mprovement Projects (Project #3 and #11) will bed. Stagonstruction would be required for all ramp reconsr ction freeway widening. Freeway operations would most lik-be affecte4y this project, however, freeway lane closures ar ,aot aticipated. An EB concrete shoulder will be constructed with 712 f• twidth to provide for future widening as and #11. contemplated by Bene T lane' addi would help to alleviate the weaving condition be R-241 and SR-71, as well as remove vehicles from the jnline that would be exiting at Green River Road and SR-71. tatus ing is from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) _ r,with $71.44M approved, and the balance of project costs are from Wither sources. Construction began in late 2009 and was completed in September 2010. Coal Canyon tNi r rtna(lrr-vn River Rr1 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 29 161 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 • by Adding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction Appendix Project No: B-4 Actual Completion: January 2013 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 65,005,000 $ 19,639,000 $ 573,000 $ 85,217,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed LEGEND Existing Highway ® interchange/Ramp moo Existing Interchange HOV or HOT Lane Existing Lane MINN Project Improvement Lane MINN Auxiliary Lane 1 Project Description This project proposes capacity and one general purpose (GP) lane on e SR-91 connector to east of the westbound (WB) SR-91 from jus to the Imperial Highway (SR would facilitate truck traffic Key Considerations Caltrans is not txmsi� Benefits Alleviates con truck scales congesti (NB) S and Roa Gypsum ements by adding 91 from the SR-55/ interchange and on eir Ci3riyon Road interchange an. w Additionally, this project ck scales in both directions_ ng rocation 81 the truck scales at this time. on on W R-91 by eliminating the lane drop at the vidin continuous GP lane to SR-90_ Alleviates y eliminating the lane drop for northbound -91 byroviding an auxiliary lane to Lakeview Avenue, providing a continuous GP lane through Weir Canyon i was completed in January 2013. The project received $22M Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) funding and $74M ansportation Improvement Program (STIP) Augmentation funds. •IwII• &two. #fry tdis+aen i'" NOTE: FAIRMONT BLVD IS CONTINGENT UPON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 30 • • 162 • • SECTION 5: REFERENCES The following documents and resources were used in the development of the 2014 Plan. Data was provided by OCTA, ROTC, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), and other agencies. PSR-PDS for SR-241/SR-91 Connector, January 2012 Project Report and Environmental Document (EIR/EIS) for SR-91 CIP from SR-241 to Pierce Street Project, October 2012 Draft PSR-PDS "On SR-91 Between SR-57 and SR-55' PS&E "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County" (April 2011) Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report, August 2010 Project Study Report/Project Report 'Right of Way Relinquishment on Westbound State Route 91 Between Weir Canyon Road and Coal Canyon", May 2010 SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study, December 2009 SR-91 Feasibility Study from SR-57 to SR-55, December 2009 Feasibility Evaluation Report for Irvine -Corona Expressway Tunnels, December 2009 Renewed Measure M Strategic Plan, June 2009 Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71, May 2009 Project Study Report "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2009 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study, March 2009 Project Study Report/Project Report "On Gypsum Canyon Road Between the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Westbound Off - Ramp (PM 16.4) and the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Eastbound Direct On -Ramp (PM 16.4)", June 2008 California Transportation Commission, Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), February 2007 Project Study Report "On Route 91 from Green River Road to Serfas Club Drive in the City of Corona in Riverside County", December 2006 Orange County Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, November 2006 Project Study Report "On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County", October 2006 Riverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) — Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report, January 2006 Preliminary design plans for Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71, 2006 Project Study Report "Westbound State Route 91 Auxiliary Lane from the NB SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange", July 2004 California — Nevada Interstate Maglev Project Report, Anaheim -Ontario Segment; Califomia-Nevada Super Speed Train Commission, American Magline Group, August 2003 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 31 163 Route Concept Reports for SR-91, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 Various Preliminary Drawings and Cross Sections, Caltrans Districts 8 and.12 2014 SR-91 Implementation Plan 32 164 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Eric De Hate, Staff Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2015-19 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 2015-19 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Measure A provides member agencies with local funding for street maintenance and operations, street repairs, street improvements, and new infrastructure of their local streets and roads systems. Since the new authorization of Measure A in 2009, the cities and the county of Riverside received over $188 million (July 1, 2009 — March 30, 2014). Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies in order to receive LSR funds. First, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and the county must participate in either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Western County agencies must also participate in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan managed by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). Staff is in the process of obtaining confirmation from CVAG, WRCOG, and RCA regarding the current participation in these programs. Additionally, agencies are required to annually provide to the Commission a project status report for the prior year CIP, a five-year CIP detailing how the Measure A funds are to be expended, and an annual certification of maintenance of effort. On February 10, 2014, staff provided the local agencies with a five-year Measure A revenue projection for LSR to assist in preparation of the required CIP. These projections for FY 2014/15 are summarized in the attachment. The required CIP and supporting documentation have been received from all of the local agencies for approval, with the exception of the city of Norco, which will be presented at a future Commission meeting. Agenda Item 9C 165 The FY 2014/15 Measure A LSR disbursements to eligible local agencies with Commission - approved CIPs are expected to commence in September 2014. Attachments: 1) Measure A Fiscal Year 2014/15 Revenue Projections 2) Five -Year FYs 2015-19 Measure A Five -Year CIPs — Posted on Commission Website Agenda Item 9C 166 ATTACHMENT • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION PROJECTION FOR FY 2014//15 WESTERN COUNTY EASTERN COUNTY BANNING $530,000 CATHEDRAL CITY $1,401,000 CALIMESA $149,000 COACHELLA $629,000 CANYON LAKE $169,000 DESERT HOT SPRINGS $494,000 CORONA $3,707,000 INDIAN WELLS $244,000 EASTVALE $1,088, 000 I N D 10 $1, 716, 000 HEMET $1,611,000 LA QUINTA $1,509,000* JURUPA VALLEY $1,802,000 PALM DESERT $2,718,000 LAKE ELSINORE $1,137,000 PALM SPRINGS $2,048,000 MENIFEE $1,438,000 RANCHO MIRAGE $876,000 MORENO VALLEY $3,586,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $2,007,000 MURRIETA $2,065,000 SUB -TOTAL EASTERN COUNTY $13,642,000 NORCO $599,000 PERRIS $1,353,000 PALO VERDE VALLEY RIVERSIDE $6,655,000 BLYTHE $973,000 SAN JACINTO $718,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $249,000 TEMECULA $2,744,000 SUB -TOTAL PALO VERDE $1,222,000 WILDOMAR $555,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $5,112,000 TOTAL FY 2014/15 $50,633,000 RCTC REGIONAL ARTERIAL $751,000 SUB -TOTAL WESTERN COUNTY $35,769,000 * La Quinta receives 50% of its allocation, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) receives the remaining 50% under an agreement until such time La Quinta reimburses CVAG for TUMF fees CVAG would have received from La Quinta if La Quinta had joined the TUMF program when the TUMF was established. 167 ATTACHMENT 2 Um IN.= Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF BANNING FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 City of Banning Public Works Department April 30, 2014 Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: � wr- ri VI/ tE ._� �7 U :.! L _ 'S F I.. LYE RIVERSIDE COUNP1( • RANSI't?RTATION COMMISSION Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Alvarez: The City of Banning respectfully submits its Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2014/2015 — 2018/2019 as approved by the City Council during its regular meeting on April 22, 2014. Also enclosed with this letter you will find the City's MOE Certification Statement, Project Status Report for FY 2012/2013 and FY 2013/2014 along with a certified copy of the Resolution approving the Five -Year Measure "A" CIP Plan. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at (951) 922-3130. Sincerely, Art Vela, P.E. Senior Engineer Copy: Duane Burk, Director of Public Works File Enc. Certified Resolution Five -Year Measure "A" Plan Project Status Report MOE Certification Statement 99 E. Ramsey St. • P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3130 • Fax (951) 922-3141 1 RESOLUTION NO.2014-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEASURE "A" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, in 1988, Riverside County voters approved a 0.5% sales tax (Measure "A") over a 20-year span to be used toward improvements of state highways, local transit systems, and public streets; and WHEREAS, in 2002, Riverside County voters approved a 30-year extension of the Measure "A" 0.5% sales tax; and WHEREAS, each City in Riverside County is required by the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") to submit a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (attached as Exhibit "A"), as approved by its governing board, to indicate how Measure "A" funding is to be utilized over the next five years; and WHEREAS, the RCTC has estimated that the City of Banning will receive a total of $2,813,000.00 in Measure "A" funds over the next five years; and WHEREAS, the program is intended to support local transit systems, street pavement rehabilitation and public street improvements; and WHEREAS, the Measure A Ordinance requires annual certification that discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation -related construction and maintenance activities for Fiscal Year 2014/2015 will meet or exceed the Maintenance of Effort Certification ("MOE") base year amount and commitment to expending Measure A funds to projects identified in the city's Five Year CIP; and WHEREAS, the priority list of street locations can be changed by the City Council by submitting a written request to RCTC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows: SECTION 1. City Council adopts Resolution No. 2014-25, "Approving the Measure `A' Five Year Capital Improvement Plan." SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of April, 2014. Reso. No. 2014-25 Deborah Franklin, Mayor City of Banning ATTEST: �,, 7 ,:e7; Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT: David J. Al e, City Attorney Aleshire & Wynder, LLP CERTIFICATION: I, Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2014-25 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22" a of April, 2014, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councihnembers Miller, Peterson, Welch, Mayor Franklin NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Westholder ABSTAIN: None Reso. No. 2014-25 L--/-77'7a2a &4./7 Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk City of Banning, California 2 CERTIFIED TO DE A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK;.__ _. rr TITLE ef.i%y «4�� DATE 47_ v?'� � �/ EXHIBIT "A" MEASURE "A" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2014/2015 - 2018/2019 Reso. No. 2014-25 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014/2015 - 2018/2019 Agency: City of Banning Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Arturo Vela, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 4-22-14 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014/2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014/2015 Projects: 2014/2015 $1,150,254.00 $530,000.00 $1,680,254.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Cherry Street: Hoffer Street to George 1 Street AC Overlay $120,000.00 $120,000.00 Lincoln Street: San Gorgonio Avenue to 2 Hargrave Street AC Overlay $300,000.00 $300,000.00 3 City Wide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal $110,000.00 $110,000.00 4 TOTALS y $530,000.00 $530,000. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014/2015 - 2018/2019 Agency: City of Banning Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Arturo Vela, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 4-22-14 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015/2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015/2016 Projects: 15/2016 $1,150,254.00 $546, 000.00 $1,696,254.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Allen Street: Hoffer Street to George Street AC Overlay $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Nicolet Street: Sims Street to Sunset 2 Avenue AC Overlay $318,000.00 $318,000.00 3 City Wide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal $60,000.00 $60,000.00 4 FTIP: Ramsey Street: Hargrave Street to Street Rehabilitation $477,000.00 $295,000.00 East City Limits TOTALS $773,000.00 p $955,000. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014/2015 - 2018/2019 Agency: City of Banning Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Arturo Vela, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 4-22-14 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016/2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016/2017 Projects: $923, 254.00 $562,000.00 $1,485,254.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Ramsey Street: San Gorgonio Avenue to 8th 1 Street AC Overlay $262,000.00 $262,000.00 8th Street: Lincoln Street to Westward 2 Avenue AC Overlay $130,000.00 $130,000.00 Charles Street: Hargrave Street to 1037 F. 3 Charles Street AC Overlay $85,000.00 $85,000.00 4 Wesley Street: Hargrave Street to 1041 E. AC Overlay $85,000.00 $85,000.00 Wesley Street TOTALS $562,000.00 $562,000. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014/2015 - 2018/2019 Agency: City of Banning Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Arturo Vela, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 4-22-14 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017/2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017/2018 Projects: FY 2017/2018 $923,254.00 $579,000.00 $1,502,254.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Cottonwood Road: 8th Street to 12th Street AC Overlay $110,000.00 $110,000.00 2 George Street: 8th Street to 12th Street AC Overlay $110,000.00 $110,000.00 3 10th Street: Williams Street to George Street AC Overlay $115,000.00 $115,000.00 4 12th Street Williams Street to George Street AC Overlay $124,000.00 $124,000.00 AC Overlay $120,000.00 $120,000.00 5 14th Street: Williams Street to George Street TOTALS 1 $579,000.00 $579,000. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014/2015 - 2018/2019 Agency: City of Banning Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Arturo Vela, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 4-22-14 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018/2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018/2019 Projects: FY 2018/2019 $923,254.00 $596,000.00 $1,519,254.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Lincoln Street: Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue New Construction $596,000.00 $596,000.00 TOTALS $596,000.00 $596,000. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Banning Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Arturo Vela, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 5-8-14 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Hoffer Street: Alessandro Rd to Construction contract awarded. Start date: 1 Hargrave Street Street Rehabilitation $110,000.00 $110,000.00 7/31/2014 4/21/14 Alessandro Road: Williams Street to Construction contract awarded. Start date: 2 Ramsey Street Street Rehabilitation $40,000.00 $40,000.00 7/31/2014 4/21/14 Ramsey Street: Hargrave Street to Construction contract awarded. Start date: 3 San Gorgonio Avenue Street Rehabilitation $125,000.00 $125,000.00 7/31/2014 4/21/14 The budgeted Measure A amount was $470,000. The award of the project resulted in a savings of $195,000. TOTALS $275,000.00 $275,000.00 2014-2015 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the CITY OF BANNING (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure "A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $164,325.00, approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2012 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary Local Funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure "A" funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated:/t>,6'/[ Reso. No. 2014-25 ,J , 2014 Homer Croy, Intrim City Manager Attest: City Clerk/Secretary Mu mum Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF BLYTHE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 CITY OF LyTHE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 440 SOUTH MAIN STREET BLYTHE, CALIFORNIA 92225-271 7 PHONE (760) 922-661 1 FAX (760) 922-0278 May 30, 2014 Grace Alvarez Planning and Programming Manager 4080 Lemon St., 3rd Floor Riverside, Ca 92501 Re: City of Blythe Measure A Capital Improvement Plan FYs 2015-2019 Dear Mrs. Alvarez: Enclosed please find the City of Blythe Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2015-2019, Maintenance of Effort Certification FY 2014/2015, and Project Status Report for CIP FY 2013/2014. The sub 2014 S Sinc e-CFPEFYs 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 incorporate the 2012 and ansportation Imovement Program trade for local Measure A funds. �a Armando J. G. Baldizzon PE Director of Public Work FY 204/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Blythe (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No, 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $520,192, approved by the Commission at its July 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not. use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: Mav 9 a 2014 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: Y a5' SECRETAY Agency: City of Blythe Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6161 Date: May 12, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $3,685,184 $973,000 $4,658,184 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 1 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (25,000/yr) Construction and Repair of wheel chair ramps $100,000 $50,000 2 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $100,000 $50,000 3 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys $50,000 $50,000 4 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $100,000 $50,000 5 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $100,000 $50,000 6 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) $215,300 $215,300 7 Administrative Overhead $77,840 $77,840 TOTALS 743,140 543,140 Estimated Prior Year STIP Trade Balance: Estimated FY 2012 STIP Allocation: Estimated FY 2014 STIP Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $0 $641,000 $464,822 $1,105, 822 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost STIP Trade Funds 2014-2015 8 Hobsonway/CVAG Loan Payment (Phase 1) (STIP Trade) $563,200 $563,200 9 N Broadway From Juniper Trail to 10the Ave Grind and Overlay (STIP Trade) $323,700 $173,700 10 N Solano Avenue from Hobsonway to W Chanslor Way Grind and Overlay, curb and gutter, sidewalk and ADA ramps (STIP Trade) $661,200 $330,600 TOTALS 1,548,100 1,067,500 Agency: City of Blythe Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6161 Date: May 12, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 4,115,044 1,002,000 5,117, 044 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 1 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (25,000/yr) Construction and Repair of wheel chair ramps $100,000 $100,000 2 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $150,000 $120,000 3 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys $100,000 $100,000 4 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $120,000 $100,000 5 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $150,000 $130,000 6 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) $215,200 $215,200 7 14th Avenue from Solano Ave to Intake Blvd. Major reconstruction,grind and overlay, and ADA ramps $915,000 $732,000 8 Administrative Overhead $80,160 $80,160 TOTALS 1,830,360 1,577,360 Estimated Prior Year STIP Trade Balance: Estimated FY 2012 STIP Allocation: Estimated FY 2014 STIP Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 38,322 38,322 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost STIP Trade Funds 2015-2016 W Rice Street from S Willow Ave to S Lovekin Blvd Major reconstruction, curb and gutter, sidewalk and ADA ramps (STIP Trade) $195,000 $38,322 9 TOTALS 196,000 38,322 Agency: City of Blythe Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6161 Date: May 12, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 3,539,684 1,032,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits 2016-2017 1 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Defrain Blvd from 1-10 to 6th Avenue Braodway from End South to Donlon Street Administrative Overhead Project Type Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks Grind and overlay on alleys Preventive maintenance Pot hole repairs/street maintenance Debt Service (2009/2019) Major reconstruction, surface treatment Major reconstruction, surface treatment Total Cost $150,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $215,200 $745,000 $520,000 $82,560 4,571,684 Measure A Funds $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $215,200 $495,000 $260,000 $82,560 TOTALS 2,012,760 1,452,760 Estimated Prior Year STIP Trade Balance: Estimated FY 2016 STIP Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 0 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost STIP Trade Funds 2016.2017 TOTALS 0 Agency: City of Blythe Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6161 Date: May 12, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 3,118, 924 1,063,000 4,181,924 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $150,000 $50,000 2 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys $100,000 $50,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $100,000 $50,000 4 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $150,000 $100,000 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) $215,200 $215,200 6 Hobsonway from 7th Ave to Intake Major reconstruction, surface treatment $715,000 $550,000 7 Main Street from 14th Ave to Chanslor Way Surface Treatment $312,500 $250,000 8 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation $200,000 $200,000 10 Administrative Overhead $85,040 $85,040 TOTALS 2,027,740 1,550,240 Estimated Prior Year STIP Trade Balance: Estimated FY 2016 STIP Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 0 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost STIP Trade Funds 2017-2018 TOTALS 0 Agency: City of Blythe Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6161 Date: May 12, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 2,631,684 1,095,000 3,726,684 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Construction and Repair of wheel chair ramps $150,000 $50,000 2 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $100,000 $50,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Grind and overlay on alleys $100,000 $60,000 4 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Preventive maintenance $150,000 $60,000 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $215,200 $215,200 6 Hobsonway from Intake to End East Major reconstruction, surface treatment $732,160 $563,200 7 7th Street from 14th Ave to Chanslor Way Major reconstruction and surface Treatment $429,000 $330,000 8 Administrative Overhead $87,600 $87,600 TOTALS 1,963,960 1,416,000 Estimated Prior Year STIP Trade Balance: Estimated FY 2016 STIP Allocation: Estimated FY 2018 STIP Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $0 $0 $0 $0 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost STIP Trade Funds 2018-2019 TOTALS 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Blythe Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6161 Date: May 12, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 1998/15 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (25,000/yr) , Construction 25,000 2 2013/14 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project , Construction 100,000 - 3 2013/14 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements / Construction 100,000 - 4 2013/14 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal • Construction 100,000 - 5 2004/15 Hobsonway/CVAG Loan Payment (Phase 1) (STIP Trade) , Debt Payment 225,000 180,000 October 2014 6 2013/16 Hobsonway Reconstruction/Engineering (Phase 4) - Riviera -, Engineering 670,000 33,000 July 2014 7 2013/14 Administrative Overhead _ Administrative Overhead 50,000 50,000 8 2013/14 Grind and Overlay City Streets (STIP Trade) . Construction 200,000 - 9 2013/14 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) -"..' Construction 131,000 - 10 2009/19 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment (Debt Service Debt Payment 240,000 236,212 11 2013/14 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation / Rehabilitation 50,000 TOTALS 1,891,000 499,212 Min Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CALIMESA FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 City of Calimesa June 4, 2014 Grace Alvarez Planning and Programming Manager 4080 Lemon St., 3rd Floor Riverside, Ca 92501 Re: City of Calimesa Measure A Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Years 2015-2019 Dear Mrs. Alvarez: Enclosed please find the City of Calimesa Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2015-2019, Maintenance of Effort Certification FY 2014/2015, and Project Status Report for CIP FY 2013/2014. Sincerely, Ynnie Johns Assistant City Manager/Finance Director 908 Park Avenue • Calimesa, California 92320 • (909) 795-9801 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Calimesa (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,401, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: June 4, 2014 RANDY ANST'17NE, CITY MANAGER ATT DANE GERDES, CIS` CLERK RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Bob French Phone #: (909) 798-9501 Date: June 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: Item No. Project Name / Limits 2014-2015 2062 2084 2076 2065 2068 SR2S - 2nd St. and Avenue L Calimesa Blvd. Desert Lawn Dr (Cherry Vlalley to Desert Lawn Cemetery) Donna Lane - Avenue L to Myrtlewood Citywide Slurry Seal $569,087 $149,000 $718,087 Project Type Pedestrian Improvements Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab Total Cost 1,010,000 80,000 120,000 165,000 50,000 Measure A Funds 299,000 80,000 120,000 165,000 50,000 TOTALS 1,425,000 714,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Bob French Phone #: (909) 798-9501 Date: June 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 4,087 153,000 157,087 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 2084 Calimesa Blvd. Pavement Rehab 25,000 25,000 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab 125,000 125,000 TOTALS 150,000 150,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Bob French Phone #: (909) 798-9501 Date: June 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 7,087 158,000 165,087 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 Pavement Rehab 150,000 150,000 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation TOTALS 150,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Bob French Phone #: (909) 798-9501 Date: June 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 15,087 163,000 178,087 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total host Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Pavement Rehab 150,000 150,000 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation TOTALS 150,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Bob French Phone #: (909) 798-9501 Date: June 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 28,087 168,000 196,087 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab 150,000 150,000 TOTALS 150,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-14 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Bob French Phone #: (909) 798-9501 Date: June 4, 2014 Item No. I Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 2013-2014 2062 SR2S - 2nd Street and Avenue L Pedestrian Access and Street Widening 214 15 February 2015 Out to bid 2063 2nd Street Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation 100 5 Preparing bid package 2064 Calimesa/Avenue L Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation 79 5 Preparing bid package 2065 Donna Lane (Avenue L to Myrtlewood) Pavement Rehabilitation 79 5 Preparing bid package 2066 Brady Lane (Avenue L to Myrtlewood) Pavement Rehabilitation 20 5 Preparing bid package 2067 5th Street Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation 20 5 Preparing bid package 2068 Citywide Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation 52 0 Deferred to FY 14-15 TOTALS 564 40 EMI MEN Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CANYON LAKE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 CITY OF CANYON LAKE RIVERSIDE CO,UN1Y 'TRANSPORTATION OOMMISSION April 1, 2014 Grace Alvarez Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 Dear Ms. Alvarez: Enclosed is the original "FY 2014/15 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement" from the City of Canyon Lake. Sincerely yours, A.Kay Vin Interim City Clerk 31516 Railroad Canyon Road, Canyon Lake, CA 92587.951/244-2955 • FAX 951/246-2022 admin@cityofcanyonlake.com • www.cityofcanyonlake.com FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Canyon Lake (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $28,873, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: /J'e1.4. li 6 , 2014 n 4#01/V CINAG ATTEST: 02 ,ifyus')—• CR 1RY-) Agency: Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Canyon Lake Habib Motlagh (951) 943-6504 4/2/2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013 - 2014 Item No Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status Debt Service for Measure A Loan payment on Railroad 1 Loan - RCTC loan 557 84 N/A Cyn Rd. Widening is on -going Loan payment to County of Debt Service to County of Riverside for pavement rehab 2 Riverside 49 N/A is on -going Total 557 133 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $241,000- $72, 000 $169,000 --- Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 48 48 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal 110 109 Maint. & Other Maint. TOTALS 242 241 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $174,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $174,000 Item No. 2015-2016 Project Name / Limits Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan Debt Service to County Railroad Canyon Road Project Type 84 53 Pavement Rehab, Signal 60 Maint. & Other Maint. TOTALS Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 84 53 37 197 1'l4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $0 $179,000 $179,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 58 58 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal 80 37 Maint. & Other Maint. TOTALS 222 179 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $184,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $184,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 63 63 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal 100 37 Maint. & Other Maint. TOTALS 247 184 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: March 4, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $0 $190,000 v $190, 000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan , ; 1 84 2 Debt Service to County 63 63 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal 100 43 Maint. & Other Maint. TOTALS 247 Min Mom Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CATHEDRAL CITY FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 �tl Cathedral City May 8, 2014 Ms. Grace Alvarez Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: FY 2014-2015 through FY 2018-2019 Measure A CIP Amendment #1 Dear Ms. Alvarez: .2 044 - .2 o/'? The City of Cathedral City is proposing to amend its FY 2033- Measure A Local Funds CIP as follows: Correct the mathematical errors identified in our original submittal of May 7, 2014. There are no other proposed changes at this time. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 770-0360. Sincerely, .r� c Bill Simons, P.E. City Engineer FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Cathedral City (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $391,688, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: -" 7 , 2014 C CITY MANAG R ATTEST: i RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: Cathedral City Page of Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 8, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 2 3 Date Palm Crosswalks SR2S Travel Way ADA Compliance Capital Capital $382,000 $100,000 $32,000 $87,000 Jun-14 Dec-14 Complete RFP in June 2014 City wide maintenance operations, transportation planning, design and traffic signal maintenance Operation/Maintenance $1,095,200 $1,078,200 Ongoing TOTALS $1,577,200 $1,197,200 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 8, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $500,000 $1,401,000 $1,901,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 Public Works Department Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and proposed projects) City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. Various traffic/transportation related projects $1,225,000 $100,000 $9,000,000 $1,025,000 $87,000 $100,000 Travel way ADA Compliance Date Palm Drive Bridge Widening TOTALS 1,212,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2016 Agency: Cathedral City Page of Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 8, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 689,000 1,443, 000 2,132, 000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 Public Works Department Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and proposed projects) City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. Various traffic/transportation related projects TOTALS $1,350,000 $16,000,000 $9,000,000 $1,150,000 $150,000 $150,000 1,450,000 Ramon Road Bridge Widening Date Palm Drive Bridge Widening RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: Cathedral City Page of Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 8, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 682,000 1,486,000 2,168,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 Public Works Department C Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and proposed projects) City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. Various traffic/transportation related projects TOTALS $1,480,000 $16,000,000 $9,000,000 $19,000,000 $1,250,000 $150,000 $50,000 $100,000 $1,550,000 Ramon Road Bridge Widening Date Palm Drive Bridge Widening Cathedral Canyon Drive Bridge RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Cathedral City Page of Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 8, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 618,000 1,531,000 2,149,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Ty • e Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 Public Works Department Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and proposed projects) City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. Various traffic/transportation related projects TOTALS $1,600,000 $16,000,000 $19,000,000 $1,450,000 $150,000 $150,000 1,750,000 Ramon Road Bridge Widening Cathedral Canyon Drive Bridge Agency: Cathedral City Page of Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: May 8, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 399,000 1,577,000 1,976, 000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $1,600,000 $1,460,000 Capital Improvement Projects Various traffic/transportation related projects (Ongoing and proposed projects) Cathedral Canyon Drive Bridge $19,000,000 $300,000 TOTALS $1,760,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF COACHELLA FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 b�� lOAPOR, Tro- "A May 19, 2014 Shirley Medina RCTC PO Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Ms. Medina: j) kV/ r.E SIDE COUNTY 'TRANSPORTA7 ON COMMISSION The City of Coachella Engineer's Department would like to submit an updated 5-Year FY 2015-2019 Measure A Local Funds Program. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) approved the City of Coachella's FY 2014-2018 Measure A Local Streets and Roads 5-Year Plan that was submitted on July 17, 2013. Adjustments have been made to the FY14/15, FY15/16, FY16/17 and FY17/18 project since the approval of the FY 2014-2018 Measure A Local Streets and Roads 5-Year Plan. These adjustments are within the amended project listing for FY14/15, FY15/16, FY16/17 and FY17/18 enclosed for RCTCs approval. These adjustments will provide funding for Grapefruit Blvd., Avenue 48, Redondo Sur, Redondo Norte, Redondo Poniente, Corte Molino, Corte Santos, Corte Percebe and Corte Loreto. The prior streets have been moved back one fiscal year. These revisions are incorporated in the 5-Year Plan, which is attached. If you have any question please do not hesitate to contact me. 'Thank you, /Jonathan Hoy, P.E., City Engineer City of Coachella 760-398-5744 jhoy(&,coachella.org Minutes CC/CSD/CFPD/CFA/CEGACCC/CWA/SA-RDA May 14, 2014 Page 3 b. Approve Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and FY 2014/15 Maintenance of Effort Certification for 2015-2019 c. Execute Two -Month Contract Extensions (through August 31, 2014) for the Landscape Maintenance Services Contracts with Kirkpatrick Landscaping Services and Mariposa Landscape, Inc. for the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD) 1 through 38. Total Amount of $74,000.00 plus a 15% Contingency for Vandalism and Repair Work. d. Execute a Second One -Year Contract Extension of the Maintenance Service Agreement with CV Pipeline in the amount of $124,570.00 for Storm Drain System Maintenance within Specific Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD). e. Irrigation Service Agreement with Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to maintain availability of Irrigation Water Service to Bagdouma Park f. Investment Report - October 2013 Motion: To approve Consent Calendar Items 8.a. through 8.f. Made by: Councilmember .Martinez Seconded by: Councilmember Aviles Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember Aviles, Councilmember Martinez, Councilmember Zepeda, Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez and Mayor Garcia NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 9. NEW BUSINESS CALENDAR (LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE): a. Appointment of Miguel Terriquez to the Parks and Recreation Commission, hereby replacing Nathaniel Benitez as Commissioner. Motion: To approve per staff recommendation. Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez Seconded by: Councilmember Aviles Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember Aviles, Councilmember Martinez, Councilmember Zepeda, Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez and Mayor Garcia NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Coachella (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $92,205, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: n(10, j 45 , 2014 C TANAGER Das» . 66trci(t ATTEST: -- 0-A(14L SECRETA CAAceti-LQA____ beowhj Cij CIS/� Agency: Page 1 of 3 Prepared by: Phone #: Date: Five -Year CIP Measure A Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2015-2019 City of Coachella Jonathan Hoy, P.E. City Engineer 760-398-3502 5/6/2014 Fiscal Year Project Name / Limits Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: Project Type Total Cost 646,865 629,000 1,275,865 Measure A Funds 2014/15 Street Resurfacing Phase 11- (1) Grapefruit blvd; (2) Avenue 48;(3) Redondo Sur; (4) Redondo Norte; (5) Redondo Poniente; (6) Corte Molino; The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement (7) Corte Santos; (8) Corte Percebe; (9) Management Update. Corte Loreto (1)-273,000 (2) - 275,000 (3) - 120,000 (4) - 93,000 (5) - 66,000 (6) - 39,000 (7) - 45,000 (8) - 48,000 (9) - 43,865 1,002,865 Agency: City of Coachella Page 2 of 3 Fiscal Year Project Name / Limits Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: Project Type 273,000 648,000 921,000 Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015/16 Street Resurfacing Phase 12 - (1) Naomi Court from La Ponderosa to East End; (2) Perez from Naomi Court to La Hernandez; (3) Romaulda from Perez to La Hernandez East End; (4) Oritiz from Perez to La Hernandez The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. (1) - 240,000 (2) - 268,000 (3) - 220,000 (4) - 193,000 921,000 Fiscal Year Project Name / Limits Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: Project Type 667,000 667,000 Total Cost Measure A Funds Street Resurfacing Phase 13 - (1) Via Conchilla from Avenida De Plata to Avenida De Platina; (2) Avenida De 2016/17 oro from Ave. 50 to Guitron; (3) Avenida Cortez from Ave. 50 to Calle Leon. The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. (1) - 167,000 (2) - 265,000 (3) - 235,000 667,000 Agency: City of Coachella Page 3 of 3 Fiscal Year Project Name / Limits Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: Project Type 687,000 687,000 Total Cost Measure A Funds Street Resurfacing Phase 14 - (1) Calle Vega from Calle Leon to Paseo Laredo; (2) Paseo De Laredo from 2017/18 Frederick to Avenida Cortez; (3) Via Durango from Avenida Coez to End; (4) Ave. 48 from Van Buren West 1/4 mile. The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. (1) - 125,000 (2) - 133,000 (3) - 136,000 (4) - 293,000 687,000 Fiscal Year Project Name / Limits Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: Project Type 708,000 708,000 Total Cost Measure A Funds Street Resurfacing Phase 15 - (1) Via Hermosa from Avenida Cortez to End; (2) Vera Cruz from Avenida Cortez to 2018/19 End; (3) Frederick From Ave. 50 to Ave. 49; (4) Ave. 49 from Harrison to Van Buren. The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. (1) - 245,000 (2) - 129,000 (3) - 115,000 (4) - 219,000 708,000 Five -Year CIP Measure A Project Status Report Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program Project Status Report for FY 2013-14 Agency: City of Coachella Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Jonathan Hoy, P.E. City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-3502 Date: 5/6/2014 Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Project Name/ Limits Street Resurfacing Phase 9 & 10 - (1) Frederick Ave. 49 to Ave. 53 Project Type The project will improve Frederick Street full width of the roadway, improve ADA access to the new Rancho Los Flores Park, improve public access to Rancho Los Flores Park, and connects for a complete thoroughfare from Avenue 49 to Avenue 53 on Fredrick Street. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. Total Cost 1,138,100 Measure A Funds Estimated Completion 1,138,100 FY 13/14 Status Project is under construction and will be completed prior to June 30, 2014 NM Mon . Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CORONA FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT r©EllWEB MAY 12 2014 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (951) 736-2266 (951) 279-3627 (FAX) Nelson.Nelson@ci.corona.ca.u. May 7, 2014 400 SOUTH VICENTIA AVENUE, P.O. BOX 940, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879-0940 CITY HALL - ON LINE ALL THE TIME (http://www.discovercorona.com) Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 SUBJECT: MEASURE A FIVE YEAR PLAN, MOE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT Ms. Trevino: The following documents are enclosed for your review: • Measure A proposed FY 2014/15 through 2018/19 Capital Improvements Plan • Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed certification statement • Program Status Report for current Fiscal Year 2013/14 • Measure A Annual Disbursement Projects received at the City The City's minimum MOE is set at $2,208,200; however, as of June 30, 2014, the City will have spent $805,143 from Measure A and $13,837,718 from other funds to support Measure A project expenditures. The document supporting the MOE calculations can be found attached, entitled "FY 2013/14 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures." The Measure A proposed FY 2014/15 through 2018/19 Capital Improvement Plan will be presented to our City Council for review at the Budget Workshop scheduled for June 4, 2014; and for adoption at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting on June 18, 2014. If you have any questions please contact Kim Sitton, Finance Manager at (951) 279-3532. Sincerely, 0 elson D. Nelson, P.E. Public Works Director Attachments c: Kim Sitton, Finance Manager Elaine Fleming -Stanford, Principal Accountant Theresa Daily, Principal Accountant FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for The City of Corona (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and base year amount of $2,208,200 approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 5- 6 , 2014 IPA Bradly L. obbins, City Manager ATTEST: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 CITY OF CORONA Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone0: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 30, 2014 Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Project Type Total Cost Measure A. Funds (Actual) csn•rn0:-0 Comofirnnu Status 1. Allev Improvements 6277 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 565.509 - On -going On -going Design and construction of improvements to various al eys.. Improvements will provide safe and smooth driving conditions. 2. Arterial Widening 7381 Roads. Bridges and Freeways 242.378 On-c u,ng On -going Street widening in various areas throughout the Ctty to complete the full width of street improvements. 3- Auto CenteriSanta Fe Railroad Grade Separation 7115 Roads, Bridges artd Freeways 31.222.3 2,769 August 2015 Under Construction Construct a four lane grade separation at intersection of Auto Center Drive with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe grade. crossing, 4, Citywide Benchmark 6886 Roads, Bridges .ar Freeways 80,000 - Ongoing On -going Update of Citywide benchmarks and adjustments to North American Datum (NAD) &3. 5. Citywide GIS Master Ptan 7103 Build"uig, Facilities and Systems 190.894 1,459 On -riving On -going Acquisitionof hardware and software. data conversion and applications development to expand the existing Geographic Information System. or GIS, for citywide implementation. 6. citywide miscellaneous ADA Facilities 7079 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 309.685 65.21C On -going On -going Construction of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant taciHt+es within the public right: of way- 7. Coto Bridge Widening 7112 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 318.986 - Bridge widening on Com Street by the Corporation Yard. B. Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension 8604 Reads, Bridges and Freeways 56A75,736 75.577 December 2015 Under Construction Design and construction of foothill Parkway from Skyline Drive to Paseo Grande. 9. Green River Road Improvements 61g7 Roads- Bridges and Freeways 4.467,2W - Aug+,st 2015 Under Construction Widen Green River road to four lanes between the 91 freeway and Palisades Drive. 10. local Street Widening, Curb and Gutter Improvements 7352 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 65 T.392 43,542 On+.7o.1g On-geuig Widening . of local streets and installation of curbs, gutters, driveways, and sidewalks.. Miscellaneous curb and gullet repair and related work. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION iE4EASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 CITY OF CORONA Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone #: (951) 279-3537 Date: April30, 2014 Item No., Project Name and Description Project ` No. Projec: Type Total Cast Measure Ftmds (Actual) Estimated Completion Status VI Magnolia Avenue Beautification 6241 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 281.823 - On-goirn.t On•gcing This project will enhance the transportation system by providing raised medians, decorative landscaping and irrigation, pedestrian scale trees, decorative hardscape and beautification elements such as themed bus benches. The improvements wil result in a more pleasing environment for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 12. Magnolia/ 1-15 Freeway Corridor 7096 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 101,373 Completed Completed Improvements to the Magnolia Avenue/1-15 Freeway interchange 10 improve traffic flow, Ramp northbound. widening of the on ramp and widening Magnolia between both 1-15 Freeway ramps. 13. Magnolia Neece Traffic Signet 6E47 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 119,721 119.721 Completed Completed The County has designated a traffic signal to be constructed at the intersection of Magnolia and Neece. The project will be managed by the County. 14. Maier Pavement Rehabilitation 7080 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 4,586,414 10,314 On -going Cn-going Pavement rehabilitation of valises streets in accordance with the Pavement Management Program. 15. Parkridee and Lincoln Improvement Project 6854 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 319,325 19 l06 May 2014 Under Construction Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Parkridge and Lincoln Avenue. 16. Pavement. Management. Studv 7069 Roads. Bridges and Freeways 70,550 5,526 On -going On -going Field survey of loom sneetS for inclusion into Micrcpaver 10 comptete the street inventory and update of study for rehabilitation projects. 17. Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets 6921 Roads: Bridges and Freeways 4158,998 27 On -going Cn-going Pavement rehabilitation for local streets in accordance with the current pavement management study, Rehabilitation may include reconstruction paving. crack sealing• slurry. etc. fa. Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance 6922 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 691,273 8,484 On -going Co -gong Resurface and repair potholes and miscellaneous pavement failures with City staff. 19. Safe Routes to School Cycle 2 6887 Roads. Bridges and Freeways 15.877 December 2015 Cn-going Construct a cross walk signal on Fullerton north of Monarch. Pagea13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 CITY OF CORONA Agency: Clty of corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone #: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 30, 2014 Item No.; Project Name and Description Project No. Project Type' Total Cost HanSure A Funds tArtt#F i iirrtifad CanrpkWOnn Status 20. Safe Routes to School Cycle 8 6888 8027 Roads. Bridges and Freeways Roads. Bridges and Freeways 3Z.063 1,221.079 - 398,310 On -going On -going Or. -going Or -tieing '. Construction of a traffic signal at Lincoln and Parkridge, 21. Sidewalk Construction Repair or replacement of curb. gutter, sidewalk. and drive approaches. Installation of missing sidewalk, curb, gutter, access ramps, bike paths, root priming, engineering, and incidental work-. 22. Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter InsfailationlReplacement Maintenance 7073 7107 Roads. Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways 411,277 722.536 146.497 275 On -going Completed I Or -gang I I Completed Repair or replacement of curb, gutter. sidewalk, and drive approaches- Installation of messing sidewalk, curb, gutter, access -ramps. bike paths, root pruning, engXleterttg, and incidental work, 23. Sixth Street EastlmorovementS Design and construct landscape median on East Sixth Street from Et$obrante Road to the easterly city limits. Improve the East Sixth Street I El Camino intersection to ultimate improvements and install trafficsignet. 24. Smith Street Pavement Rehabilitation 6889 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 750.000 - On -gang On -gang Grind and overlay Smith Sheet between SR-91 and Riacon. 25. Striping Rehabilitation 7292 Operational Roads, Bridges and Freeways 457.895 15,140 \4E4 On -going Or -gang Upgrade and maintenance of striping citywide by City forces or annual contract, 26.'Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) TOTAL _ S 108.034.137 1.070,151 61 Projects 2010/11 Bicycle Transportation Grant (BTA) (Item No.1 from approved FY 13/14 Measure A CIP) and SB821 Paseo Grande (Item No.13 from approved FY 13/14 Measure A CIP) were included in the approved FY 13/14 Measure A CIP, but were also shown as completed in the FY 12/13 Measure A status report. These two projects were not included in this status report to avoid duplication. r-. of 3 Agency: City of Corona Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (961) 279-3637 Date: April30, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-15 to 2018-19 Fiscal Year 2014-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2013.14 Continuing Appropriation: MARA Appropriation (Foothill Project): Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Project: $ 1,538,196 13,638,686 28,000,000 3,707,000 $ 48,783,780 MEASURE A FUNDS item No. Project Name/Llmits Project Type Total Cost FY 13-14 Estimated Moos A Funds Carryover FY 14-15 Measure A Funds Estimated Measure A Approp Available 1 Ailey Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 565,509 $ 100,000 $ $ 100,000 2 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways ' 242,378 181,746 181,746 3 Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 31,222,533 321,746 - 321,746 4 Citywide Benchmark Update Roads, Bridges and Freeways 80,000 40,000 - 40,000 5 Citywide GIS Master Plan Building, Facilities and Systems 190,894 39,555 - 39,555 6 Cola Bridge tNidenIng Roads, Bridges and Freeways 318,986 50,000 - 50,000 7 Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension Roads, Bridges and Freeways 56,475,736 28,276,944 - 28,276,944 8 Green River Road Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 4,467,220 682,857 - 682,857 9 Local Street Widening, Curb and Gutter Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 857,392 613,850 - 813,850 10 Magnolia Avenue Beautification Roads, Bridges and Freeways 281,823 275,502 - 275,502 11 Magnolia/ 1-15 Freeway Corridor Roads, Bridges and Freeways 101,373 101,373 101,373 12 Parkridgo and Uncoln Improvement Project Roads, Bridges and Freeways 319,325 11,479 - 11,479 13 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Cycle 3 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 15,877 15,877 - 15,877 14 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Cycle 8 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 32,063 32,063 32,063 15 Sixth Street East Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 782,538 408,347 408,347 18 Aviation Way Slurry Roads, Bridges and Freeways 41,000 41,000 17 Citywide Traffic Model Update Roads, Bridges and Freeways 100,000 100,000 18 Citywide Misceilrmeous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways 309,685 184,290 150,000 334,290 19 Foothill Parkway Phase!! Roads, Bridges and Freeways 200,000 200,000 20 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 4,586,414 3,726,797 1,000,000 4,726,797 21 Ontario Avenue Street Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 53,984 53,984 22 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 70,550 65,024 25,000 90,024 23 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 4,158,998 3,986,831 1,000,000 4,086,631 24 Public Safety Way Slurry Roads, Bridges and Freeways 35,000 35,000 25 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance 891,273 429,006 150,000 579,008 Roads, Bridges and Freeways 28 Sidewalk Construction Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,324,079 925,789 400,000 1,325,769 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Installation/Replacement 27 Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 411,877 103,974 300,000 403,974 28 Smith Street Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 750,000 750,000 200,000 950,000 29 SR-91 Capital Improvement Project Betterment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 100,000 100,000 30 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 457,895 217,755 100,000 317,755 31 Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) - 167,141 187,141 Total: $108,514,416 $ 41,538,585 $ 4,022,125 $ 45,560,710 Estimated FY 2014-15 Moasuro A Balance: $ 1,223,070 Agency: City of Corona Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 30, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-15 to 2018-19 Fiscal Year 2015-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Project: $ 1,223,070 3,818,000 I� . 5,041,070 Item No. Project Name/Llmlts Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Chase Drive Improvements - Phase III Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 650,000 $ 400,000 2 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways 150,000 150,000 3 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 4 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 5 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 6 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 7 Sidewalk Construction Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 8 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 9 SR-91 CIP Betterment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 100,000 100,000 10 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 11 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 172,155 172,155 Total: $ 4,422,155 $ 3,647,155 '� Estimated FY 2015-16 Measure A Balance: $ 1,393,915 V Agency: City of Corona Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 30, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-15 to 2018-19 Fiscal Year 2016-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,393,915 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: 3,933,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Project: $ 5,326,915 Item No. Project Name/Limits ' Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 4 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 6 Sidewalk Construction Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 7 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 8 SR-91 CIP Betterment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 100,000 100,000 9 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 10 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 177,320 177,320 Total: $ 3,727,320 $ 3,202,320 Estimated FY 2016-17 Measure A Balance: $ 2,124,595 Agency: City of Corona Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 30, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-15 to 2018-19 Fiscal Year 2017-18 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017.2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Project: $ 2,124,595 (. 4,051,000 ' 6,175,595 / Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 4 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 6 Sidewalk Construction Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 7 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 8 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 9 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget 182,639 182,639 Total: $ 3,632,639 $ 3,107,639 Estimated FY 2017-18 Measure A Balance: $ 3,067,955 11/ Agency: City of Corona Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April30, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-15 to 2018-19 Fiscal Year 2018.19 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 3,067,955 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: 4,173,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Project: $ 7,240,955 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 25,000 4 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 6 Sidewalk Construction Roads, Bridges and Freeways 400,000 400,000 7 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,000 150,000 8 Striping Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 325,000 100,000 9 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget 188,119 188,119 Total: $ 3,588,119 $ 3,063,119 Estimated FY 2018-19 Measure A Balance: $ 4,177,837 11.1 OMEN Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 City of Desert Hot Springs 65-950 Pierson Blvd. • Desert Hot Springs • CA • 92240 (760) 329-6411 WWW.cityofdhs.org May 12, 2014 Shirley Medina Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 RE: City of Desert Hot Spring Measure "A" five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2014/15-2018/19 and Maintenance of Effort Dear Ms Medina: Attached is the City of Desert Hot Springs' Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2014-2019, a Project Status Report for our FY 2013/14 and the City's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 329-6411 Ext. 234 Sincerely, Amy A r Administrative Services Director Attachments: Measure "A" Five Year (CIP) FY 2014-2019 Project Status Report FY 2013/14 Maintenance of Effort Certification Cc: Finance Department Engineering RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 6 of 6 Prepared by: Richard Kopecky Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: April 29,2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Citywide roadway rehab/slurry sealing Maintenance $1,267,675 $276,000 Nov-13 Complete 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P Total Road Improvement Program) Services 2012A COP's (Certificate of Partickpation) Debt Service $400,994 $200,000 June-14 On -going TOTALS $1,668,669 $467,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 1 of 6 Prepared by: Richard Kopecky Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: April 29,2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $0 Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: $494,000 ✓ Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $494,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Repair/Suface Treatmant/Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter Repair/Signing and Striping Maintenance $1,619,000 $255,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service $399,000 $200,000 3 Jefferson Street Reimbursement $39,000 $39,000 TOTALS $2,057,000 $494,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 2 of 6 Prepared by: Richard Kopecky Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: April 29,2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $509,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 509,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Repair/Suface Treatmant/Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter Repair/Signing and Striping Maintenance $750,000 $299,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) D/S $401,000 $200,000 3 Jefferson Street Reimbursement $10,000 $10,000 TOTALS $1,161,000 $509,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 3 of 6 Prepared by: Richard Kopecky Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: April 29,2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $524,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 524,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Repair/Suface Treatmant/Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter Repair/Signing and Striping Maintenance $850,000 $302,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) D/S $398,000 $200,000 3 Jefferson Street Reimbursement $22,000 $22,000 TOTALS 1,270,000 524,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 4 of 6 Prepared by: Richard Kopecky Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: April 29,2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $540,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 540,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Repair/Suface Treatmant/Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter Repair/Signing and Striping Maintenance $450,000 $340,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) D/S $398,000 $200,000 TOTALS $848,000 $540,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 5 of 6 Prepared by: Richard Kopecky Phone #: (760) 329-6411 Date: April 29,2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $556,000 '- Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 556,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Roadway Rehab/Repair/Suface Treatmant/Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter Repair/Signing and Striping Maintenance $500,000 $366,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP's (Certificate of Participation) D/S $400,000 $200,000 TOTALS $900,000 $556,000 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Desert Hot Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $75,147, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: S e , 2014 *if-E N-CITY MA47-40,7- G ATTEST: SECTARY nom �- Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF EASTVALE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Eastvale Page: 1 of 6 Prepared by: George Alvarez, Public Works Director Phone #: (714) 615-0883 Date: May 28, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,564,721 / Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,088,000 ✓/ Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $ 2,652,721 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 542,105 $ 145,105 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 4,530,821 $ 1,974,450 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets $ 326,215 $ 326,215 TOTALS 5,399,141 2,445,770 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Eastvale Page: 2 of 6 Prepared by: George Alvarez, Public Works Director Phone #: (714) 615-0883 Date: May 28, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 206,951 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,121,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $ 1,327,951 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 700,000 $ 400,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; $ 310,000 $ 310,000 TOTALS .1 mo,non 730,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Eastvale Page: 3 of 6 Prepared by: George Alvarez, Public Works Director Phone #: (714) 615-0883 Date: May 28, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 597,951 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,155,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $ 1,752,951 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 700,000 $ 400,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; $ 310,000 $ 310,000 TOTALS 1,030,000 730,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Eastvale Page: 4 of 6 Prepared by: George Alvarez, Public Works Director Phone #: (714) 615-0883 Date: May 28, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,022,951 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,190,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 2,212,951 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 700,000 $ 400,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; $ 310,000 $ 310,000 TOTALS 1,030,000 730,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Eastvale Page: 5 of 6 Prepared by: George Alvarez, Public Works Director Phone #: (714) 615-0883 Date: May 28, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,482,951 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,226,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,708,951 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 700,000 $ 400,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; $ 310,000 $ 310,000 TOTALS 1,030,000 730,000 J RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Eastvale Page: 6 of 6 Prepared by: George Alvarez, Public Works Director Phone #: (714) 615-0883 Date: May 28, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion / Expended to Date Status 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 200,000 $ 20,000 $ 11,895 This is an annual program. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. 2 Street Improvement Program / .. Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 2,695,917 $ 879,917 $ 116,550 This is an annual program. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. 3 Citywide Maintenance Program ✓/ Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; $ 967,000 $ 967,000 $ 950,785 This is an annual program. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. TOTALS 3,862,917 1,866,917 1,079,230 MEE Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF HEMET FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 510 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE • HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92543 • (951) 765-2360 Frcom ENGINEERING Shirley Medina Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street PO Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Grace Alvarez May 12, 2014 Dear Grace: Enclosed please find the Measure A 2013-2014 Status Report, projections for 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 for RCTC's use recording the City of Hemet's utilization of Measure "A" funds. Also, included is the City of Hemet's MOE signed by Mr. Wally Hill, City Manager The City appreciates your work at RCTC in assisting us to maintain our local streets and roads. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 765-3847. Sincerely, CITY OF HEMET Victor Monz, PE Principal Engineer cc: Jorge Biagioni, PE Director of Engineering/City Engineer FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Hemet (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $18,924, approved by the Commission at its October 12, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 7, 2014 CITY MANA R Wally Hill A TEST: 81 yl to SECRETARY Sarah McComas, City Clerk RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: Hemet Page Status Report FY 13-14 Prepared by: Victor Monz, PE Phone #: (951) 765-3847 Date: June 3, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status ` Measure A Working Capital : $2,205,657 + allocation 13-14 = $ 1,521,000 = $3,726,657 See below planned is carryover into work 13-14 and all 2014-15 1 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind and Overlay of $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Bids Due 8/1/14 P,S & E 755 600,000 sf of pavement Begin work 9/15/14 Complete 12/31/14 2 Gilbert Street Rehabilitation Project 200,000 sf of pavement grind and overlay $ 574,450 $ 131,171 In Federal Process Bids due on/about $0 spent as of this date — 3/1/15 Begin Work 5/1 /2015 Complete Work 6/30/15 TOTALS $ 3,074,450 $ 2,631,171 Total Carryover $ $3,726,657 to 14-1f. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Hemet Page of 1 of 5 Prepared by: Victor Monz, PE Phone #: (951) 765-3847 Date: June 3, 2014 June 30, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $3, 726,657 $1,611,000 $5,337,657 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 1 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind and Overlay include ADA Access $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Ramps where required 2 Gilbert Street Rehabilitation Grind and Overlay $ 574,450 $ 131,171 TOTALS $ 3,074,450 $ 2,631,171 Balance $ 2,706,486 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Hemet Page of 2 of 5 Prepared by: Victor Monz, PE Phone #: (951) 765-3847 Date: June 3, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 2,706,486 ♦- ***--' Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,659,000 - Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 4,365,486 �- Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 Grind and Overlay include ADA Access Ramps where required $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation TOTALS $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Balance $1,865,486 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Hemet Page of 3 of 5 Prepared by: Victor Monz, PE Phone #: (951) 765-3847 Date: June 3, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 1,865,486 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,709,000 ' Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 3,574,486 : Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 Grind and Overlay include ADA Access Ramps where required $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation TOTALS $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Balance $1,074,486 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Hemet Page of 4 of 5 Prepared by: Victor Monz, PE Phone #: (951) 765-3847 Date: June 3, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $1,074,486 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,760,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,834,486 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Grind and Overlay include ADA Access Ramps where required $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation TOTALS $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Balance $334,486 L. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Hemet Page of 5 of 5 Prepared by: Victor Monz, PE Phone #: (951) 765-3847 Date: June 3, 2014 L= J Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $334,486 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,813,000 , Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 2,147,486 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 Grind and Overlay include ADA Access Ramps where required $ 2,147,486 $ 2,147,486 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation TOTALS $ 2,147,486 $ 2,147,486 Balance $0.00 L_ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF INDIAN WELLS FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 firr INDIANV WALLS CALIFORNIA April 11, 2014 Riverside County Transportation Commission Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Officer 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 pL© GCMG RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Re: Measure "A": Local Streets and Roads five-year Capital Improvement Plan and Status Update Dear Ms. Medina: Attached is the City of Indian Wells Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2014/15-2018/19. Following is the status of the City project listed on the FY 2013-14 five-year plan: Project Status Olt Measure "A" ($000's) ($l1OIl's) Citywide Parkways Ongoing $585 cc: Finance Director Sincerely, Ken Seumalo Public Works Director RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 11, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 100 244 1- 344 -'-- Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Slurry Seal on Miles Ave. Street Improvement 400 0 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 344 TOTALS 1,010 344 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 11, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 0 251 251 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Street Grind Overlay Street Improvement 1,000 0 3 Slurry Seal on Local Streets Street Improvement 250 251 4 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 TOTALS 1,860 251 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 11, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 0 259 259 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 2 Slurry Seal on Highway 111 Street Improvement 100 0 5 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 259 TOTALS 710 259 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 11, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 0 267 267 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 267 TOTALS 610 267 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: April 11, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 0 275 275 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 I Street Striping Street Improvement 25 0 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 275 TOTALS 610 275 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Indian Wells (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $963;640, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: /17w; /5- , 2014 i Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF INDIO FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 May 30, 2014 Ms. Grace Alvarez Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan (FY14/15 — FY18/19) Dear Ms. Alvarez: Enclosed is the City of Indio's revised submittal of the Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 14/15 to 18/19 to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for review and approval. We have made the changes as discussed previously. The City's Maintenance of Effort certification is also enclosed, as well as a status report for projects utilizing Measure A funds in Fiscal Year 2013-2014. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 391-4017. Sincerely, Grant D. Eklund, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer cc: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Eric Weck, P.E. Principal Civil Engineer Brian Kinder, Accountant p; 760.391.4000 f: 760.391.4008 • 100 Civic Center Mall Indio, CA 92201 • www.IN01O.org FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Indio (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,048,564, approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 5, 2014 Dan Martinez, City Manager ATTEST: nthia Hernandez, City Cle RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Indio Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $1,288 $1,716 $3,004 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2016 1) Indio Blvd. Bridge N/B @ Storm Channel - seismic retrofit Design $ 50 $ 15 2) Indio Blvd. Bridge S/B @ UPRR - seismic retrofit Design $ 50 $ 10 3) Indio Blvd. Bridge N/B @ Storm Channel - scour protection Design $ 60 $ 10 4) Indio Blvd. Bridge S/B @ Storm Channel - scour protection Design $ 60 $ 10 5) Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Preliminary Design $ 500 $ 10 6) Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Design, Right -of -Way $ 150 $ 10 7) Jefferson Street & Varner Road Widening Construction $ 1,000 $ 280 8) Hwy. 111 Improvements (Rubidoux St to Arabia St) Design $ 140 $ 70 9) Hwy. 111 Improvements (Madison St to Rubidoux St) Design $ 1,000 $ 10 10) 1-10 and Jefferson Street Interchange Construction $ 1,000 $ 600 11) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 48 - Hwy 111) Design $ 340 $ 10 12) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50-Ave 52), Phase II Design & Right -of -Way $ 3,400 $ 50 13) North Indio Pavement Improvements Design. Applied for CMAQ Grant for Construction $ 82 $ 52 14) Date Street Pavement Rehabilitation (Calhoun -Cypress) Design & Construction $ 540 $ 50 15) Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies Construction $ 1,480 $ 10 16) Hwy 111 Sidewalk and Ramp Upgrade Construction $ 160 $ 20 17) Jefferson Street Sidewalk Infill Construction $ 207 $ 50 18) Clinton Street Sidewalk (So. Of Miles Ave) Design $ 46 $ 20 19) Jackson/Market Traffic Signal Construction $ 502 $ 20 20) 3 Traffic Signals & Landscaping at Ave 42 & Monroe St Construction $ 100 $ 50 21) Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Misc. (as needed) $ 60 $ 50 22) Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronoization Design & Construction. Applied for CMAQ Grant $ 629 $ 24 23) Jefferson & Dunbar Traffic Signal Design. Applied for CMAQ with City of La Quinta $ 72 $ 20 24) Westward Ho & Road Runner Mini Roundabout Design. Applied for CMAQ with City of La Quinta $ 68 $ 20 25) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment $ 673 $ 673 26) Grant Applications for Transportation Projects (Overhead) Grant Preparation $ 62 $ 52 27) Indio Internal Services (Overhead) Internal Service Fees $ 49 $ 49 TOTALS 12,480 2,245 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Indio Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 759 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: 1767 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 2,526 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 1) Indio Blvd. Bridge N/B @ Storm Channel - seismic retrofit Construction $ 100 $ 5 2) India Blvd. Bridge S/B @ UPRR - seismic retrofit Construction $ 100 $ 10 3) Indio Blvd. Bridge N/B @ Storm Channel - scour protection Construction $ 60 $ 10 4) Indio Blvd. Bridge S/B @ Storm Channel - scour protection Construction $ 60 $ 10 5) Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Design $ 600 $ 10 6) Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Design, Right -of -Way $ 120 $ 50 7) Hwy. 111 Improvements (Rubidoux St to Arabia St) Construction $ 40 $ 220 8) Hwy. 111 Improvements (Madison St to Rubidoux St) Design & Construction $ 1,000 $ 110 9) 1-10 and Jefferson Street Interchange Construction $ 1,000 $ 600 10) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 48 - Hwy 111) Right -of -Way $ 100 $ 50 11) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50-Ave 52), Phase II Design & Right -of -Way $ 1,000 $ 300 12) Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies Construction $ 1,480 $ 10 13) Clinton Street Sidewalk (So. Of Miles Ave) Design $ 46 $ 20 14) Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Misc. (as needed) $ 70 $ 50 15) Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronoization Design & Construction $ 100 $ 50 16) Jefferson & Dunbar Traffic Signal Design $ 40 $ 20 17) Westward Ho & Road Runner Mini Roundabout Design $ 40 $ 20 18) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment $ 673 $ 673 19) Grant Applications for Transportation Projects (Overhead) Grant Preparation $ 62 $ 52 20) Indio Internal Services (Overhead) Internal Service Fees $ 49 $ 49 TOTALS 6,740 2,319 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Indio Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 207 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: 1820 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 2,027 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1) Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Design, Right -of -Way $ 200 $ 10 2) Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Construction $ 200 $ 100 3) Hwy. 111 Improvements (Rubidoux St to Arabia St) Construction $ 40 $ 20 4) Hwy. 111 Improvements (Madison St to Rubidoux St) Construction $ 8,000 $ 400 5) 1-10 and Jefferson Street Interchange Construction $ 1,000 $ 10 6) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 48 - Hwy 111) Right -of -Way $ 100 $ 50 7) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50-Ave 52), Phase II Construction $ 2,000 $ 250 8) Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies Construction $ 1,480 $ 10 9) Clinton Street Sidewalk (So. Of Miles Ave) Construction $ 400 $ 20 10) Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronoization Construction $ 1,000 $ 50 11) Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Misc. (as needed) $ 70 $ 50 12) Avenue 50 Widening (Madison - Monroe) Design $ 100 $ 50 13) Jefferson & Dunbar Traffic Signal Construction $ 150 $ 20 14) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment $ 673 $ 673 15) Grant Applications for Transportation Projects (Overhead) Grant Preparation $ 62 $ 52 16) Indio Internal Services (Overhead) Internal Service Fees $ 49 $ 49 TOTALS 15,524 1,814 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Indio Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 213 1875 2,088 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1) Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Construction $ 4,000 $ 100 2) Hwy. 111 Improvements (Madison St to Rubidoux St) Construction $ 1,000 $ 400 3) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 48 - Hwy 111) Construction $ 1,000 $ 250 4) Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50-Ave 52), Phase II Construction $ 5,000 $ 230 5) Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies Construction $ 1,480 $ 10 6) Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Misc. (as needed) $ 70 $ 50 7) Avenue 50 Widening (Madison - Monroe) Design & Right -of -Way $ 100 $ 50 8) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment $ 673 $ 673 9) Grant Applications for Transportation Projects (Overhead) Grant Preparation $ 62 $ 52 10) Indio Internal Services (Overhead) Internal Service Fees $ 49 $ 49 TOTALS 13,434 1,864 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Indio Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 224 1931 2,155 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1) Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Construction 4000 380 2) Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies Construction 1480 10 3) Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Misc. (as needed) 70 50 4) Avenue 50 Widening (Madison - Monroe) Construction 1500 700 5) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment 673 673 6) Grant Applications for Transportation Projects (Overhead) Grant Preparation 62 52 7) Indio Internal Services (Overhead) Internal Service Fees 49 49 TOTALS 7834 1914 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Indio Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Tom Rafferty, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: May 7, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Jefferson Street & Varner Road / Design & Construction $ 1,500 $ 650 9/2014 Design Complete. Under Improvements Construction Now 2) Hwy 111 Street Improvements / / Design $ 300 $ 152 12/2017 Under Design. Construction will proceed in phases. / 3) Shields Road Connection Design $ 40 $ 40 10/2015 Under Design Now 4) Measure A Advance Debt Repayment / Payment $ 673 $ 673 On -Going Completed for FY13/14 TOTALS $ 2,513 $ 1,515 Miiil INNE• .. Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 .Cityofj, Frank Johnston, Mayor •Micheal Goodland, Mayor Pro Tem • Verne Lauritzen, Council Member • Laura Roughton, Council Member • Brad Hancock, Council Member Attn: Grace Alvarez, Programing and Planning Manager Therisia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Floor Riverside CA 92502 May 12, 2014 pECI-g,1.1VE I\MAY 12 2914 Subject: RCTC Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads RIVFRSIQ COUNTY Jurupa Valley Five -Year C1P for FY 2014/15 — FY 201��'ORTATION COMMISSION 1} J� Dear Ms. Alvarez, The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, at its regular meeting on May 1st, 2014, adopted the City's Five Year Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2014/15 through FY2018/19. The 5-Year Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five -Year CIP is attached. See attachment A. Also attached is Project Status Report — FY 2013-2014 CIP. See Attachment D Based on the City's incorporation on July 1, 2011 no annual Maintenance of Effort (MOE) certification is required until after the third year of incorporation. The City requests that the Riverside County Transportation Commission accept and approve the City's Measure A 5-Year CIP and find the City eligible to continue receiving its fair share allocation of Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads revenues. If you have any questions ease call me or Mike Myers at 951-332-6464 or cell 909-844-4846. Pu lic Works Director Cc: Steve Harding, City Manager George Wentz, Assistant City Manager Jim Smith, City Engineer Attachments: Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2014/15 —FY 2018/19 Measure "A" Local Funds Program Project Status Report — FY 2013-2014 8304 Limonite Avenue, Suite M, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.jurupavalley.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Mike Myers Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 6/5/2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds Budget ($000's) Measure A Funds Expended($000's) Estimated Completion Status 2013.1 Camino Real Pavement Rehabilitation, Linares Ave to 270' N/o Black Hills Dr., (8300 LF) Reimburse Riv Co 1st & 2nd of 4 Yrs Street rehab 1,500 188 375 June 30, 2016 In Repayment 2013.2 Van Buren Blvd. Pvmt Rehab Ph 2, Jurupa rd. to Bellgrave Ave Street Rehab (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,192 160 - October 31, 2014 Design 80% 2013.3 Country Villiage Road Pavement Rehab - Ph 1: Fontana Lateral to North City Limit Street Rehab (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 321 290 238 December 31, 2014 Complete 2013.4 Annual Miscellaneous St Pavement Program Street Betterment (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,000 500 - October 31, 2014 Start Con June 2014 2013.5 Annual Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Traffic 120 120 - September 30, 2014 Bids, June 2014 2013.E Annual Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program Street Maintenance 120 120 - September 30, 2014 Bids, June 2014 2013.7 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 110 110 127 June 30, 2014 Complete 2013.8 Limonite Avenue Pavement Rehab, Wineville to Day Creek Channel Street Rehab 624 624 590 June 30, 2014 Complete _ 2013.9 Rutile St/Galena Rd Pvmt Rehab, Woodbridge Ln to 1100" E of RutileNan Buren Street Rehab 240 240 24 October 31, 2014 Awarded May 2014 2013.10 Annual (FY 12/13) Miscellaneous St Pavement Program Street Betterment (Fund 2 Gas Tax, $506,100) 1,072 631 _ 631 September 30, 2013 Complete 2013.11 Annual (FY 12/13) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Street Maintenance 120 120 70 July 30, 2014 In Construction 2013.12 Annual (FY 12/13) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance 108 108 45 September 30, 2014 In Construction TOTALS 3,835 2,863 2,100 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Mike Myers Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 1,943 1,802 3,745 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 Street rehab Street Rehab (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,500 __ 1,192 188 160 _ 2014.1 2014.2 Camino Real Pavement Rehabilitation, Linares Ave to 270' N/o Black Hills Dr., (8300 LF) Reimburse Riv Co 3 of 4 Yrs Van Buren Blvd. Pvmt Rehab Ph 2, Jurupa rd. to Bellgrave Ave 2014.3 Annual (FY 13/14) Miscellaneous St Pavement Program Street Betterment _ (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,000 500 2014,4 Annual (FY 12/13) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Street Maintenance 120 50 20.14.5 Annual (FY 13/14) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Street Maintenance 120 120 2014.E 2014.7 Annual (FY 13/14) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance Street Rehab 120 120 Rutile St/Galena Rd Pvmt Rehab, Woodbridge Ln to 1100" E of Rutile/Van Buren 240 _ 216 2014.8 Pacific Ave Pavement Rehabilitation: From 45th St. to Mission Blvd. Street Rehab (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 328 190 2014.9 Rubidoux Blvd. Pavement Rehab: From Mission Blvd. to SR60 Street Rehab (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,192 301 2014.10 Annual (FY 14/15) Miscellaneous St Pavement Program Street Betterment (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,000 750 2014.11 Annual (FY 14/15) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Roadway Safety and Traffic Enhancement 120 120 2014.12 Annual (FY 14/15) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance 120 120 2014.13 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 144 144 TOTALS 2,979 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Mike Myers Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 766 1,856 2,622 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 Street Improvement (Fund 2 Gas Tax) Street Betterment (Fund 2 Gas Tax) Roadway Safety and Traffic Enhancement Street Maintenance Administration 620 619 750 200 150 148 2015.1 2015.2 Bain St. Pavement Rehabilitation and Shoulder improvements: From 54th St to Bellegrave Ave Annual (FY 15/16) Miscellaneous St Pavement Program 1,000 200 2015.3 2015.4 2015.5 Annual (FY 15/16) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Annual (FY 15/16) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal 8% Overhead/ Administration 150 148 TOTALS 1,867 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Mike Myers Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 755 1,912 2,667 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 Sierra Ave Pavement 2016.1 Rehabilitation,Armstrong Rd to 200' Street Resurfacing 500 500 S/o Karen Ln (2750 Lf) Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehab - Street Rehabilitation 2016.2 Ph 3: From Bellegrave Ave to SE/o 2 Gas Tax) 1,300 245 Etiwanda (Funds 2016.3 Annual (FY 16/17) Miscellaneous St Pavement Program Street Betterment (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,000 750 2016.4 Annual (FY 16/17) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Roadway Safety and Traffic Enhancement 200 200 Annual (FY 16/17) Miscellaneous St 2016.5 Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Street Maintenance 131 131 Seal _ 2016.6 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 153 153 TOTALS 1,979 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Mike Myers Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 688 1,969 2,657 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehab - Street Rehabilitation 2017.1 Ph 3: From Bellegrave Ave to SE/o 2 Gas Tax) 1,300 350 Etiwanda (Funds Rubidoux Blvd., 28th and 29th St 2017.2 Pavement Rehab: SR60 to 28th and 29th and 30th st, Avalon to Street Rehabilitation (Funds 2 Gas Tax) 600 400 Rubido_ux Blvd 2017.3 Annual (FY 17/18) Miscellaneous St Pavement Program Street Betterment (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,000 750 2017.4 Annual (FY 17/18) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program _ Roadway Safety and Traffic Enhancement 200 200 Annual (FY 17/18) Miscellaneous St 2017.5 Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Street Maintenance 123 123 Seal 2017.6 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 158 158 TOTALS 1,981 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Mike Myers Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 676 2,028 2,704 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 Street Rehabilitation 280 280 390 2018.1 Valley Way Pavement Rehab: Mission Blvd to Jurupa Rd 2018.2 Wineville Ave Pavement Rehab: Street Rehabilitation/ _ Construction 390 2018.3 General Dr. Pavement Rehab: 200' East of Clay St. East End Street Rehabilitation/ Construction 260 260 2018.4 Annual (FY 18/19) Miscellaneous St Street Betterment (Fund 2 Gas Tax) 1,000 750 2018.5 Annual (FY 18/19) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Roadway Safety and Traffic Enhancement 110 107 110 2018.6 Annual (FY 18/19) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Street Maintenance 107 2018.7 _ Administration 216 216 TOTALS 2,113 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF LA QUINTA FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 May 6, 2014 Tuff 4 4 4didai 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 RECEEVED MAY 09 2014 Grace Alvarez RIVERSID coUNTY Programming and Planning Manager TRANSPORTATICOMMISSION Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 Subject: City of La Quinta Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification Dear Ms. Alvarez, The City of La Quinta respectfully submits its Measure A Capital Improvement Plan, Project Status Report and Maintenance of Effort Certification for the Commission's review and approval. The City of La Quinta is a full participant in the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Programs. Please do not hesitate to contact Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer, at (760) 777-7042 or Nick Nickerson, Project Manager, at (760) 323-5344 if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Frank J. City Ma Enclosures cek RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of La Ouinta Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., City Engineer Phoneft (760)777-7042 Date: May5, 2014 Item No, Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program ' StreetlSignal Maintenance 235,000 . '- 235,000 30-Jun-14 Annual Maintenance 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel Street Improvement 1,612,000 308,000 30-Jun-19 Multi -Year Street Improvement Adams Street Signal and Street Improvements (Highway 111 Engineering Phase 3 to Whitewater Channel Street/Signal Improvement 721,000 261,000 30-Jun-15 75%Complete TOTALS 2,568,000 804,000 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of La Quinta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $937,007, approved by the Commission at its June 12, 2013 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously 'expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 2014 �.16. J` "- ATTES .�- Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager ityof la Quinta, California Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: May 5, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $48,000 $754,500 $802,500 ' Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street/Signal Maintenance 235,000 235,000 2 Avenue 52 at Jefferson Street Roundabout Modification Street Improvement 110,900 110,900 3 Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect Signal Improvement 823,502 94,456 4 Fred Waring Drive Reconstruction (Washington to Adams) Street Improvement 613,940 334,271 5 New Roundabout Westward Ho at Roadrunner Street Improvement 486,013 27,873 TOTALS 802,500 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: May 5, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015.2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $0.00 $777,000.00 $777,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street/Signal Maintenance 235,000 235,000 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel Street Improvement 1,612,000 145,500 3 New Roundabout Madison Street at Avenue 58 Street Improvement 1,018,578 116,831 4 Fred Waring Drive Reconstruction (Washington to Adams) Street Improvement 613,940 279,669 TOTALS 777,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: May 5, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $0 "' $800,500 ' $800,500 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street/Signal Maintenance 235,000 235,000 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel Street Improvement 1,612,000 325,000 3 Jefferson Street Interchange Local Share Contribution 610,500 240,500 TOTALS 800,500 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E„ City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: May 5, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 0 824500 824,500 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street/Signal Maintenance 235,000 235,000 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel Street Improvement 1,612,000 219,500 3 Jefferson Street Interchange Local Share Contribution 610,500 370,000 TOTALS 824,500 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: May 5, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $0 $849,000 $849,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street/Signal Maintenance 235,000 235,000 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel Street Improvement 1,612,000 614,000 TOTALS 849,000 MIN nom ��w.... Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 c rn c LAKE Lsino E ®, ,. DREAM EXTREME May 19, 2014 Grace Alvarez Planning & Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: City of Lake Elsinore Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (FYs 2014/15 — 2018/19) Dear Ms. Alvarez: The following documents are enclosed for your review: 1. City of Lake Elsinore Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed Certification Statement for FY 2014-15. 2. Measure A Five -Year CIP plans for FYs 2014/15 through 2018/19. 3. Project Status Report for FY 2013-14. If you should have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (951) 674-3124, Ext. 244. Sincerely, Vince Damasse Director of Public Works 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W W W.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Lake Elsinore (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $960,771, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: IA- 44, X Grant Yates, C} Manager ATTEST: 4. on Simps , Director of Administrative Services RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Vince Damasse, PW Director Phone #: (951) 674-3124 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $1,577,759 $1,137,000 $2,714,759 / Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 1 Annual Roadway Drainage Repair Program - Citywide (Project No. DRR15) Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2 Annual Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repair Program - Citywide Maintenance $ 55,000 • $ 55,000 (Project No. CGS15) 3 Annual Traffic Striping Program - Citywide Maintenance $ 175,000 $ 175,000 (Project No. STRP15) 4 Annual Pavement Management Program - PMP Update Maintenance $ 45,500 , $ 32,300 (Project No. PMP15) Arterial Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Railroad Cnyn 5 from 1-15 to Fire Station; Mission Trl from Malaga to RCR; Lakeshore from RCR to Main; Grand from McVicker Cnyn to Lake; and Main from 1-15 to Heald. (New Project) Rehabilitation $ 1,555,000 $ 820,000 1-15/Railroad Canyon SB Ramp Deceleration Lane - 5 Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans/construct decel lane on SI3 1-15 at RCR (Project No. 4432) "formerly Project No. 4235-1 Construction $ 800,000 $ 300,000 6 Traffic Signal Installation A Canyon Hills/Sage Lane - (Project No. 4368) Construction $ 235,000 $ 34,800 Avenue 7 Sidewalk & Street Improvements - design segment 7 of Avenue 7 to Mill, at the RRC Elementary School. (New Project) Construction $ 200,000 $ 40,000 8 I-15/SR 74 (Central Ave) Interchange - PA&ED phase of IC and ramp improvements (New Project) Construction $ 1,083,000 $ 66,500 9 Main Street Interchange - PSR for IC improvements and road widening (New Project) Construction $ 400,000 $ 200,000 10 Grand Ave. Rehabilitation - City/County project; City contribution to County roadway project (New Project) Construction $ 300,000 $ 300,000 11 Downtown Street Rehab & Slurry Seal - Main St. from Lakshore to 1-15 and adjacent side streets (New Project) Rehabilitation $ 541,550 $ 501,550 TOTALS $ 5,440,050 $ 2,575,150 , RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015.2019 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Vince Damasse, PW Director Phone #: (951) 674-3124 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 139,609 / Estimated FY 2015.2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,171,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $ 1,310,609 Item No. Project Name/ Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 Annual Roadway Drainage Repair Program - Citywide Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Rehabilitation Construction Construction $ 50,000 $ 55,000 $ 175,000 $ 45,500 $ 1,555,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,083,000 $ 50,000 $ 55,000 $ 175,000 $ 32,300 $ 735,000 $ 160,000 $ 66,500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (Project No. DRR16) Annual Curb, Cutter & Sidewalk Repair Program - Citywide (Project No. CGS16) Annual Traffic Striping Program - Citywide (Project No. STRP16) Annual Pavement Management Program - PMP Update (Project No. PMP16) Arterial Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Railroad Cnyn from 1-15 to Fire Station; Mission Trl from Malaga to RCR; Lakeshore from RCR to Main; Grand from McVicker Cnyn to Lake; and Main from 1-15 to Heald. Avenue 7 Sidewalk & Street Improvements - construct segment of Avenue 7 to Mill, at the RRC Elementary School. (New Project) 1-151SR 74 {Central Ave) Interchange - PA&ED phase of IC and ramp improvements (New Project) TOTALS $ 3,163,500 $ 1,273,800 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Vince Damasse, PW Director Phone #: (951) 674-3124 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 36,809 / Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,206,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 1,242,809 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 Annual Roadway Drainage Repair Program - Citywide Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Rehabilitation $ 75,000 $ 55,000 $ 215,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 75,000 $ 55,000 $ 215,000 $ 32,000 $ 865,809 1 2 3 4 5 (Project No. DRR17) Annual Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repair Program - Citywide (Project No. CGS17) Annual Traffic Striping Program - Citywide (Project No. STRP17) Annual Pavement Management Program - PMP Update (Project No. PMP17) Arterial Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Arterial roadways to be determined TOTALS $ 1,995,000 $ 1,242,809 i RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Vince Damasse, PW Director Phone #: (951) 674-3124 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,242,000 / Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 1,242,000 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Annual Roadway Drainage Repair Program - Citywide Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Rehabilitation $ 120,000 $ 140,809 $ 215,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 120,000 $ 140,809 $ 215,000 $ 32,000 $ 734,191 1 2 3 4 5 (Project No. DRR18) Annual Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repair Program - Citywide (Project No. CGS18) Annual Traffic Striping Program - Citywide (Project No. STRP18) Annual Pavement Management Program - AMP Update (Project No. PMP18) Arterial Pavement Rehabilitation Program -Arterial Roadways to be determined TOTALS $ 2,125,809. $ 1,242,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Vince Damasse, PW Director Phone #: (951) 674-3124 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,279,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 1,279,000 Item No. Project Name l Limits Project Type Total Oest Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Annual Roadway Drainage Repair Program - Citywide (Project No. DRR19) Maintenance $ 150,000 $ 150,000 2 Annual Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repair Program - Citywide (Project No. CGS19) Maintenance $ 55,000 $ 55,000 3 Annual Traffic Striping Program - Citywide (Project No. STRP19) Maintenance $ 215,000 $ 215,000 4 Annual Pavement Management Program - PMP Update (Project No. PMP19) Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 32,000 5 Arterial Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Arterial Roadways to be determined Rehabilitation $ 827,000 $ 827,000 TOTALS $ 1,297,000 $ 1,279,000 Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Vince Damasse, PW Director Phone #: (951) 674-3124 Date. May 19,2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY2013-2014 Expenditures as of January 31, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 Annual Asphalt Maintenance - (Project No. APM14) ✓ Maintenance $ 120,000 $ 2,691 6/30/2014 Project is on schedule 2 Annual Concrete Maintenance - (Project No. ccs14) ✓ Maintenance $ 85,000 $ 85,000 6/30/2014 Project is on schedule 3 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance - (Project No. STRP14) Maintenance $ 130,000 $ 101,188 6/30/2014 Project is on schedule 4 Survey Monument - (Project No. 434e) ✓ Maintenance $ 35,000 $ 35,000 6/30/2014 Project is on schedule 5 Annual Slurry Seal Program - (Project No. ssP14) ✓ Maintenance $ 144,698 $ 144,698 3/30/2014 Project is complete 6 Roadway Drainage/Maintenance - (Project No. DRR14) Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 8,632 6/30/2014 Project is on schedule 7 Pavement Management Program - (Project No. PMP14) Maintenance $ 80,000 $ 45,512 6/30/2014 Project is on schedule 8 Traffic Signal Canyon Hills/Sage - (Project No. 4368) Construction $ 235,000 $ 1,671 8/30/2014 Project is on schedule Project is on schedule. Project expenditures 9 Main St. Overlay - Sulphur to Heald - (Project No. 4405) Maintenance $ 917,468 $ 167 5/31/2014 may extend into July 2014 Project expected to be approved by GTC on _„-- 1/15/Railroad Canyon Rd SIB Deceleration Lane - May 21 2014. Ca!trans to fast -track designfenvironmenial; construction to begin 10 (Project No. 4432) *formerly Project No, 4235-1 Construction $ 800,000 $ 2/28/2015 within 6 mos of Noticz to Proceed. TOTALS $ 2,647,166 $ 424,459 BEE •Emi Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF MENIFEE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 Scott A. Mann Mayor Wallace W. Edgerton Deputy Mayor John V. Denver Councilmember Thomas Fuhrman Councilmember Greg August Councilmember 2974 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 phone 951.672.6777 Fax 95(.69.3843 vww.cityofinenifee.us May 22, 2014 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Ms. Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Subject: CIP and Project Status Report Ms. Alvarez, Enclosed, please find the City of Menifee's Measure A Local Funds Capital Improvement Program for FY 2014/15 through FY2018/19 and a project status report for FY2013/14. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or need additional information at (951) 672-6777. Thank you, onathan G. Smith Director of Public Works/City Engineer FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Menifee (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $214,225, approved by the Commission at its September 11, 2013 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: PiLf / / , 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Menifee Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Joseph Gonzales Phone #: (951) 672-6777 Date: May 19, 2014 Revised Item No, Project Name /Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Newport Interchange TRIP Debt Service 1,303,000 400,000 2014 Ongoing Design/Environmental 2,000,000 200,000 2015 Design firm selected. 2 VcCall Blvd. Interchange / Studies 3 Bradley Bridge v Design 1,500,000 500,000 2015 Design options being considered. 4 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation - Pavement Rehab. 1,000,000 497,773 2014 Ongoing 5 General Fund Transfer = � 8% Overhead 100,880 100,880 2014 Ongoing Newport Road Widening (Antelope Construction, Signal and 3,840,000 639,951 2014 Complete 6 to Menifee) - Ali Phases Maintenance 7 CIP (Holland Rd. Overpass) Design 276,040 276,040 2016 Design firm selected TOTALS 9,979,920 2,614,644 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Menlfee Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Joseph Gonzales Phone #: (951) 672-6777 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure AAvailable for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $1,720,197 ✓ $1,438,000 $3,158,197 ---- Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014.2015 1 TRIP Debt Service Payment Debt Service 1,303,000 400,000 2 Newport Interchange Construction 37,300,000 50,000 3 Pavement Management Program Pavement Rehab. 1,500,000 760,000 4 General Fund Transfer 8% Overhead 115,040 115,040 200,000 200,000 5 Encanto Road Improvements Paving 6 Leon Road Safety Improvements 75,000 75,000 TOTALS; : - �40,493 0 1,600,040 : AALAIIJsM Mf, .. 4 AWNS Atth RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Menifee Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Joseph Gonzales Phone #: (951) 672-6777 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $1, 658,157 $1,481,000 $3,039,157 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 Debt Service Pavement Rehab Overhead 400,000 1,500,000 118,480 400,000 1,500,000 118,480 1 2 3 TRIP Debt Service Pavement Management Program General Fund Transfer TOTALS 2,018,4$0 <. • •2,018,4p.. ' ....., .,'A : RS A • 77 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Menifee Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Joseph Gonzales Phone #: (951 ) 672-6777 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $1,020,677 f $1,525,000 $2,545,677 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 400,000 400,000 City Wide Pavement Rehab. Pavement Rehab 1,500,000 900,000 2 General Fund Transfer Overhead 126,832 126,832 3 Holland Road Overpass Design/Construction 1,100,000 1,100,000 4 TOTALS' 3,126'832.. - '2,526 832. , rIMP , RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Menifee Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Joseph Gonzales Phone #: (951 ) 672-6777 Date: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $18,845 $1,571,000 � $1,589,845 ' Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 400,000 400,000 City Wide Pavement Rehab. Pavement Rehab 1,500,000 1,000,000 2 General Fund Transfer Overhead 125,680 125,680 3 . 2,05,680::.: 1,525 689 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL. FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Menifee Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Joseph Gonzales Phone #: (951 ) 672-6777 Cate: May 19, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018.2019 Projects: $64,165 $1,618,000 $1,682,165 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 400,000 400,000 City Wide Pavement Rehab. Pavement Rehab 1,500,000 1,100,000 2 General Fund Transfer Overhead 129,440 129,440 3 T07Ak5: - 2,029,440.. • . •.. ..1,629440 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF MORENO VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 Ta: 951.413.:3100 www.MOVAL.ORG May 6, 2014 F MORENO VALLEY WHERE DREAMS SOAR Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92502 14177 FREDERICK SEREEI P O. Box 88005 MORENO VAI LEY, CA 92552-080.5 Subject: Fiscal Year 2015-2019 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement Dear Ms. Medina: The City of Moreno Valley is pleased to submit its Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-2019 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City Council reviewed and approved the Five -Year Measure A Local Streets and Roads CIP and Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement on April 22, 2014. An amended five-year Measure A plan will be submitted to RCTC if changes are made by City Council to the listed Measure A projects as part of the upcoming FY 2014/15 CIP approval process. Please contact me if there are any questions regarding the Measure A CIP. Sincerely, hinda Wilson Senior Management Analyst (951) 413-3132 tindawi@moval.org Enclosures: MOE Certification Statement Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2013-2014 Project Status Report Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2015-2019 c: File Prem Kumar, Deputy Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer Rick Teichert, Financial and Administrative Services Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 1 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Moreno Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year J amount of $1,459,153, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: Sr."' (' 11 12014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: (951) 413-3132 Date: April22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: *Estimated FY 2014-2015 Grant Revenue: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: Item No. 2014-2015 Project Name / Limits 1 Measure A Program Budget 2 Traffic Signal Maintenance 3 Street Maintenance Vehicle/Equipment 4 Indirect Cost Rate 5 Library Loan Repayment Project Type Program Budget Operating Budget Equipment Budget Overhead Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements 6 Transfers to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service Transfers to 2005 Lease Revenue Bond 7 Debt Service Debt Service** *Alessandro Boulevard/Elsworth Street _ 8 Intersection Improvements Street Improvements *Alessandro Boulevard at Chagall Court 9 and at Graham Street 'Alessandro Boulevard Median/Indian 10 Street to Perris Boulevard r Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp 11 Upgrades 12 Aqueduct Trail 13 Bike Lane Improvements 14 15 16 17 18 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program *Cactus Eastbound 3rd Lane Improvements__ Street Improvements *Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing _Street Improvements - Citywide Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity Inventory Traffic Signal *Delphinium Avenue Sidewalk Improvements _ Street Improvements Street Improvements Street Improvements Street Improvements Street Improvements Street Improvements Bridge Total Cost 7,712,002 3,586,000 3,933,100 15,231,102 Measure A Funds 398,794 398,794 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 286,880 286,880 750,000 750,000 991,313 991,313 1,117,000 1,117,000 670,000 670,000 642,000 642,000 888,751 888,751 233,508 233,508 425,000 85,000 41,042 41,042 11,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 5,016,354 2,066,354 31,713 31,713 400,000 400,000 ATTACHMENT 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: (951) 413-3132 Date: April22, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits . Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 19 Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards Traffic Signal 450,000 109,500 -- _ Heacock Street/San Michelle Road to 20 Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral "A" Street Improvements 1,404,676 100,000 21 Heacock Street South Extension Street Improvements 10,000 10,000 22 Indian Street/Cardinal Avenue Bridge Bridge ___ _ _ - 70,000 70,000 Indian Street/Manzanita Avenue 23 Intersection Reconfiguration Street Improvements 2,000 2,000 24 Moreno Valley Bicycle Master Plan Update Street Improvements 39,121 2,871 _ Nason Street/Cactus Avenue Street 25 Improvements Street Improvements 5,000 5,000 Pavement Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal 26 Program Street Improvements 110,000 110,000 "Perris Boulevard Widening%Ironwood 27 Avenue to Manzanita Avenue Street Improvements_ 5,944,000 1,000,000 Reche Vista Drive Realignment/Perns 28 Blvd/Heacock St to North City Limits - - -- Residential Traffic Management Program Street Improvements — 4,935 4,935 - 29 (Speed Hump Program) Street Improvements 56,399 56,399 _ 30 Safe Routes to School Outreach Program Street Improvements _ 417,60_0 41,800 *San Timoteo Foothill Storm Drain K-1 and 31 K-4 Storm Drain 1,405,000 1,405,000 32 SR-60/Nason Street Interchange Street Improvements 22,281 22,281 33 SR-60/Theodore Street Interchange Street Improvements 1,916,000 952,000 34 — *Street Improvement Program (SIP) — Street Improvements _ _-3,340,000 1,840,000 -�. *Sunnymead Boulevard/SR-60 Eastbound 35 On -ramp Intersection Improvements Street Improvements ___ 339,668 339,668 36 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrades _ Traffic Signal 134,458 134,458 37 Wayfinding and Welcome Signs Street Improvements 1,555 1,555 TOTALS 27,986,048 15,230,822 Projects have received reimbursable federal -aid or state grant awards budgeted in the Measure A Fund. Offsetting revenue received for the awards is estimated to mitigate Measure A expense by $3.9 million in FY 14/15. City of Moreno Valley Public Works Department/Capital Projects Division �" `2005 Lease Revenue Bond Expenditures Period Ending June 29, 2011 Budget Code Pro-ect Description 82125 Sunnymead Boulevard Revitalization 82425 Kitching Street/Alessandro Blvd to Gentian 82525 Ironwood/Box Springs -Barclay 82625 Ironwood Ave/Heacock St. to Perris Blvd. 6272,5 Budget I Code B2727 'school Walkway Intldl Lasselle St Improvements/Alessandro Blvd. To JFK Blvd. Project Description 82728 !Annual PavementResurfaang 82729 Bicycle Lane Subtotal Original Projects E V 06/07 FY 07/08 Expenditures Expenditures 675,489 1,185,164 14.372 216,706 O FY 05;06 Expenditures 63,146 19,427 Bond 186,906 347,207 416,463 122.767 1,223,676 2,103,333 Backtlll Bond Projects FY cam FY 06/07 ndifures Ex . end Iturea - 103.509 - 194,'251 PY 07/08 Expenditures 121.890 FY 08/09 Expenditures 3,917,542 FY 09110 FY 10/11 Expenditures Expenditures 2,422,520 902,676 1.561,983 FY 08/09 Expenditures 82730 Solar Powered Flashing Beacons/Speed Radar Signs 82735 Moreno Beach/Rte 60 Right Turn Lane Improvements 82736 Indian/CaMs Intersection 432737 fronwood/Pigeon Pass = Graham 62736 Heacock/Gentian, Poppystone & Frederick 82738 lAqueduct Bikeway/Indian-Fay 82740 Perris Blvd. Median/Ironwood-Hemlock 82741 Slurry Seal 82742 Surface Recrling 82743 .St Improvement Program SIP 82748 Day St. Widening/Rte 60 to Ironwood 8749 Pi. eon Pass Road Widenin• 62750 Perris Blvd./Ironwood - Manzanita 82751 Heacock/Hemlock - Ironwood 82753 Rte. 60/Moreno Beach Interchan•e 62731 Rte. 60/Redlands EB On/Off Ramps T/S 82732 Graham/Bs VS 8.7733 Pigeon Pass/ClimbIng Rose Traffic Sim 62734 Day/Cottonwood T/S 8275.4 .Day/Dracaea T/S 82766 Lasselle/Cottanw000d T/S 82756 Rte. 60/Moreno Beach T/S 82757 Kitching/Eucelyptus T/S 92758 Lasselle Bay T/S 1,490.940 56.939 113,144 80,1041 78,222 137,803 n-114,171 115,153 - 1.541,199 i 85, 665 394,000 179,024 / 60,051 67.521 189 15,208 222,604 1,937 1,566,780 80,313 62,768 / 8,312 83 17,656 3,685 69,649 - 5,207 216,981 65,651 66,540 3,587 - 73.955 - 3,826 - I 3,206 Subtotal - 3,954,345 30,261 504.414 4,809,488 Total Expenditures Cat$±ary 98,964 ' 8,361,82h 1,550,841 4,266.019 St St 9,289 St 862,491 2,049,930 St 19,870 2,100,931 St 2,5302186 FY 09/16 FY 10/11 Expenditures Ex•-ndiiures 16,767,984 Total Ex.endduxes Cate !o 225,398 St 1,685,191 St 101,894 St 113,313 St 15,208 St 302.645 St +� St St ® St ® St 3,107,976 St St 468,786 St 197,336 St 16,0.165 St 65,179 St zia,261 St ® St 63,300 88,402 18,034 12,644 276,674 27,377 311,312 23,a68 5,502_618 Subtotal Streets Subtotal Traffic Signals 163,149 TS 93,609 TS 235,015 TS 71,495 TS 363,114 TS 30,963 TS 385,267 TS 27,194 TS 27,405 TS 9,456,963 8,069,747 85.33% 1,387,216 14.67% 9,456,963 100.00% Page 1 of 2 City of Moreno Valley Public Works Department/Capital Projects Division **2005 Lease Revenue Bond Expenditures Period Ending June 29, 2011 Backfill Bond Projects Budget Code I Project Description FY 05/06 Expenditures FY O6/07 Expenditures FY 07/08 Expenditures FY O8/09 Expenditures FY 09/10 Expenditures FY 10/11 Expenditures Total Expenditures Category FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 Total Original Bond Projects 18,771 347,207 416,463 I 586,065 712,555 2,530,165 16,787,984 Backfill Bond Projects 3,954,345 5,502,618 - 9,456,963 Total Bond Expenditures 18,771 4,301,552 5,919,081 1 586,065 712,555 I 2,530,165 1 26,244,947 Total Streets Total Traffic Signals 24,857,731 94.71 1,387,216 5.29% 26, 244, 947 100.00% Page 2 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: (951) 413-3132 Date: April22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 280 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: 3,694,000 *Estimated FY 2015-2016 Grant Revenue: 1,000,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 4,694,280 Item Total Cost Measure A No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Funds 2015-2016 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 398,794 398,794 2 Traffic Signal Maintenance Operating Budget 200,000 200,000 3 Street Maintenance Vehicle/Equipment Equipment Budget 37,500 37,500 - Loan for Nason/Cactus 4 Library Loan Repayment Street Improvements 750,000 750,000 5 Transfers to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 991,313 991,313 Transfers to 2005 Lease Revenue Bond 6 Debt Service Debt Service 1,117,000 1,117,000 7 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvements* 1,100,000 1,100,000 TOTALS 4,594,607 4,594,607 M A F d nffcaffinn * Projects have received reimbursable federal -aid or state grant awards budgeted in the easure un .. revenue received for the awards is estimated to mitigate Measure A expense by $3.9 million in FY 14/15. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: (951) 413-3132 Date: April 22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 99,673 3,805,000 3,904,673 Item I No. 1 Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 Program 1 Measure A Program Budget Budget 380,000 380,000 2 Traffic Signal Maintenance Operating Budget 175,000 175,000 Loan for Nason/Cactus 3 Library Loan Repayment Street Improvements 750,000 750,000 4 Transfers to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,481,313 1,481,313 Transfers to 2005 Lease Revenue Bond 5 Debt Service Debt Service 1,117,000 1,117,000 TOTALS 3,903,313 3,903,313 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: (951) 413-3132 Date: April 22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 1,360 ' 3,919,000 3,920,360 Item No. I Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Program Budget Operating Budget Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements Debt Service Debt Service 380,000 175,000 750,000 1,481,313 1,117,000 380,000 175,000 750,000 1,481,313 1,117,000 1 2 3 4 5 Measure A Program Budget Traffic Signal Maintenance Library Loan Repayment Transfers to TRIP Debt Service Transfers to 2005 Lease Revenue Bond Debt Service TOTALS 3,903,313 3,903,313 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: (951) 413-3132 Date: April22, 2014 Item No. r 2018-2019 1 2 3 4 5 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 17,047 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: 4,037,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 4,054,047 6 Project Name / Limits Measure A Program Budget Traffic Signal Maintenance Library Loan Repayment Transfers to TRIP Debt Service Transfers to 2005 Lease Revenue Bond Debt Service Project Type Program Budget Operating Budget Loan for Nason/Cactus Street Improvements Debt Service Debt Service Total Cost 398,794 200,000 750,000 1,481,313 1,117,000 TOTALS 3,947,107 Measure A Funds 398,794 200,000 750,000 1,481,313 1,117, 000 3,947,107 ATTACHMENT 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: (951) 413-3132 Date: April22, 2014 Item No. Pro ect Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Program 1 Measure A Program Budget Budget 448,794 448,794 NA Annual Program 2 Citywide Signing/Striping / Operating Budget 200,000 '% 200,000 NA Annual Budget Street Maintenance On -going annual 3 Vehicle/Equipment Program Street Vehicles 710,000 710,000 Jun-16 program 4 Indirect Cost Rate ,v Overhead 268,320 268,320 NA Annual Loan for Nason/Cactus 5 Corporate Yard Loan Repayment /' Street Improvements 2,500,000 2,500,000 Sep-18 Completed Loan for Nason/Cactus 6 MVU Substation Loan Repayment / Street Improvements 150,000 150,000 Jan-14 Completed Alessandro Boulevard/ Elsworth Street 7 Intersection Improvements '' Street Improvements 840,249 79,791 Sep-16 Design in progress Alessandro Boulevard Median/Indian Construction May - 8 Street to Perris Boulevard Street Improvements 964,251 172,093 Aug-14 August 2014 Alessandro Boulevard Pavement Construction May - 9 Modification Street Improvements 110,712 110,712 Aug-14 August 2014 _ _ On -going annual 10 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramps Sreet Improvements 283,508 200,000 NA project 11 Bike Lane Improvements Street Improvements 76,042 76,042 May-14 Under construction On -going annual 12 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Bridge 10,000 10.000 NA project Citywide Annual Pavement On -going annual 13 Resurfacing Program Street Improvements 5,456,354 ' 1,372,354 NA project Citywide Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity Traffic 14Inventory Signal Inventory 61,713 61.713 Jun-16 On -going Delphinium Avenue Sidewalk 15 Improvements Street Improvements 456,444 40,973 Jan-15 Design completed Heacock St. Bridge/Perris Valley Completed - Project 16 Storm Drain Lateral "A" Bridge 11,457 3,113 Oct-12 Closeout Subject to 17 Heacock Street South Extension Street Improvements 344,909 344,909 available funding Design in progress Indian Street / Manzanita Avenue 18 Intersection Reconfiguration Street Improvements 81,622 81,622 Feb-14 Completed Moreno Valley Bicycle Master Plan 19 Update Street Improvements 147,721 11,471 Dec-14 On -going Nason Street/Cactus Avenue Street. Completed - Project 20 Improvements Street Improvements 589,938 89,202 May-13 Closeout On -going annual 21 Pavement Management Program Street Improvements 21,601 21,601 NA project Pavement Rehabilitation Program On -going annual 22 (formerly Slurry Seal Program) Resurface 127,678 127,678 NA project Reche Vista Dr. Realignment/Perria ' '' Research 23 Blvd./Heacock St. to North City Limits Street Improvements 4,935 4,935 Jun-18 construction funding Residential Traffic Management On -going Annual 24 Program (Speed Hump Program) Street Improvements 105,399 105,399 NA Project San Timeoteo Foothill Storm Drain K- Street & Storm Drain 25 1 & K-4 Impry 1,500,000 7 57,692 Apr-16 Design in progress SR-60/Nason St. Interchange Completed - Project 26 Street Improvements 162,281 162,281 Jun-12 Closeout & audit SR-SO/Theodore Street Interchange Subject to 27 ✓ Street Improvements 2,129,644 2,000,000 available funding PA&ED Street & Sturm Drain On -going annual 28 Street Improvement Program (SIP) ./ Impry 3,425,626 723,315 NA project Sunnymead Boulevard / SR-60 On- Subject to 29 Ramp Intersection Improvements ' Street Improvements 453,567 19,967 available funding Design in progress ✓ On -going annual 30 Traffic Signal Equipment/Upgrades Traffic Signal 104,458 104,458 NA project 31 Wayfinding and Welcome Signs / Street Improvements 125,036 ✓ 30,000 Dec-13 Completed TOTALS 21,872,259 /- 10,288,435 .-71** ;fit b4.J. (v. iS /) eetste,-- A sr € j., Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF MURRIETA FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 CITY OF MURRIETA May 12, 2014 0 / Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Subject: Measure A Local Streets and Road Revenue Projections, Maintenance of Effort Certification, and Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (FY 2014/15-2018/19) Dear Grace: Enclosed are the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement, proposed Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and Project Status Report for the City of Murrieta for your consideration and approval. Since the City Council has not adopted a formal Capital Improvement Plan budget for FY 2015-19, the enclosed Five - Year CIP is based on staff recommendation and may be subject to change upon further consideration by the City Council. We will contact you if there are any changes requested by the City Council. The Measure A balance carried over to FY 2014/15 is large due to several projects that are progressing through the right-of-way acquisition phase prior to construction and both the overlay/slurry seal maintenance projects are currently scheduled to begin construction in July/August of the upcoming 2014/15 fiscal year. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (951) 461-6036 or bmoehlinciamurrieta.orq at your convenience. Bob Moehling, P.E. City Engineer Attachments cc: Rick Dudley, City Manager Pat Thomas, Director of Development Services Joy Canfield, Director of Administrative Services 1 Town Square • Murrieta, California 92562 phone: 951.304.CITY (2489) • fax: 951.698.4509 • web: murrieta.org FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Murrieta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $595,702, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: t" k 4—� �'L. , 2014 CITY)VIANAGER ATTEST: tRETARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: May 22, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing � Maintenance $ 734 $ 734 Sep-14 Bids open May 21, 2014, $1.33M estimate 2 8079 Murrieta Hot Springs Widening / Construction $ 121,259 $ 120,179 Jun-15 Acquire ROW, start const in 2015 3 8137 Resurfacing - Slurry Seal ✓ Construction $ 421 $ 337 Sep-14 Bids opened May 8, Construction July 2014 4 8257 Citywide Signal Mods ✓ Construction $ 182,187 $ 95,475 Jun-14 Ongoing annual project 5 8283 Traffic Striping Modifications Construction $ 14,293 $ 93 Jun-14 Ongoing annual project 6 8293 Sidewalk Replacement ri Construction $ 979 $ 979 Jun-14 Ongoing annual project 7 8303 I-215/Clinton Keith Rd Interchange ✓ Construction $ 29,089 $ 984 Dec-14 Project closeout in progress 8 8311 I-15/Los Alamos Rd Overcrossing ✓ Construction $ 5,221,628 $ 74,653 Oct-14 Construction is 60 % complete 9 8323 Guava Bridge/Murrieta Creek ".-- Construction $ 32,774 $ Jun-16 Start const. in March 2015 10 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization --- Construction $ 271,584 $ 75,363 Jun-14 Ongoing annual project 11 8335 Jackson Ave Bridge (at Warm Springs Creek) ✓ Construction $ 4,970,896 $ 1,000,000 Jun-14 Construction complete/ongoing mitigation 12 8389 Whitewood: Hunter to Clinton Keith ✓ Construction $ - $ Jun-15 ROW Negotiations/Lawsuit Settlement 13 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Pro ✓ Construction $ 65,846 $ 13,194 Jun-14 Ongoing annual project 14 8433 Mur Hot Springs Medians: Alta,to Marg Construction $ - $ Jun-15 Start const. in Jan 2015 15 8456 Whitewood Extension ✓ Construction $ 2,473 $ 2,473 Dec-15 TUMF Network Addition request 16 10012 Jackson Ave Median • Construction $ 303 $ 303 Dec-14 Start const. in Sept. 2014 17 19000 Line G Emergency Repairs ✓ Construction $ 150,077 $ 150,077 Mar-14 Construction complete; mitigation required 18 COP 2007 for 15/215 MHS Interchange Debt Service $ 728,932 $ 728,932 Mar-14 Construction complete t TOTALS $ 11,793,475 $ I/2,263,776 ' RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: May 22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 7,658,404 l° Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,065,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $ 9,723,404 . Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing Maintenance 1,900,000 1,000,000 2 8079 Murrieta Hot Springs Widening Construction 10,000 1,000 3 8137 Resurfacing - Slurry Seal Construction 1,000,000 400,000 4 8257 Citywide Signal Mods Construction 100,000 50,000 5 8283 Traffic Striping Modifications Construction 20,000 5,000 6 8293 Sidewalk Replacement Construction 100,000 100,000 7 8303 I-215/Clinton Keith Rd Interchange Construction 5,000 500 8 8311 I-15/Los Alamos Rd Overcrossing Construction 2,000,000 790,000 9 8323 Guava Bridge/Murrieta Creek Construction 2,000,000 500 10 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization Construction 100,000 50,000 11 8389 Whitewood: Hunter to Clinton Keith Construction 10,000 500 12 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Pro Construction 30,000 15,000 13 8433 Mur Hot Springs Medians: Alta to Marg Construction 50,000 5,000 14 8456 Whitewood Extension Construction 100,000 20,000 15 10012 Jackson Ave Median Construction 5,000 5,000 16 19000 Line G Emergency Repairs Construction 1,000 1,000 17 COP 2007 for 15/215 MHS Interchange Debt Service 730,002 730,002 TOTALS 8,161,002 3,173,502 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: May 22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 6,549,902 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,127,000 / Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $ 8,676,902 / 7 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance 500,000 500,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 750,000 600,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 30,000 15,000 7 8456 Whitewood Road extension Construction 1,000,000 300,000 8 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 725,458 725,458 TOTALS 3,345,458 ' 2,335,458 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: May 22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 6,341,444 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,191,000 / Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 8,532,444 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance 500,000 500,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 750,000 400,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 30,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 724,145 724,145 TOTALS 2,344,145 1,834,145 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: May 22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 6,698,299 / Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,257,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 8,955,299 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance 500,000 500,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 750,000 400,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 30,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 726,645 726,645 TOTALS 2,346,645 1,836,645 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: May 22, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 7,118,654 ' Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,325,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 9,443,654 ✓ Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance 500,000 500,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 750,000 400,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 30,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 723,239 723,239 TOTALS 2,343,239 1,833,239 Mil Maw Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PALM DESERT FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346-0611 info cayofpalmdesert org May 30, 2014 Shirley Medina Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92502-2208 Subject: Measure "A" Capital Improvement Program - Revised Dear Shirley, The City of Palm Desert recently submitted the 2015-2019 Measure "A" CIP plan for approval. Riverside County Transportation Commission returned the plan for revision because the expenditures exceeded the revenues. The reason the expenditures exceed the revenues is because there is no place in the plan to show revenues generated from reimbursements from sources such as the State or Federal funding programs. The reimbursements replenish the Measure "A" fund and would balance the revenues and the expenditures. The City has been in contact with Grace Alvarez, and we received direction on how fill out the report. The direction is to show the net annual expenditures for each project. So any reimbursements that are anticipated in the subject fiscal year should be subtracted from the estimated expenditures. Filling out the report in this manner is useful as a cash flow tool. However, the City Finance Department is concerned that filling out the report in such a manner will not be acceptable to the Measure "A" auditors. The budget amount that goes before the City Council for approval will not match the report that goes before RCTC for approval. Attached is an e-mail from Jose Luis Espinoza to Theresia Trevino detailing his concerns with the report. The City of Palm Desert has revised the five year plan to be more accurate on a cash flow basis. However, the City believes the report to be less accurate and we will continue to work with RCTC to find a solution that achieves the goals of the report and is in accordance with the auditing procedures. Enclosed for Commission consideration is the City of Palm Desert's revised 2014/2015 — 2018/2019 Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program. The Five -Year Program will be reviewed in the near future by our City Council. If the City Council makes any changes to the program, a revised version will be submitted to you for approval. If no changes are made, please treat this as the official submittal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (760) 346-0611, ext 469. Sincere Mark n[+Sod,. Director f Public Works Enclosure cc: John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance CITY Of POEM DESERT 0n *oc,aawarw FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Desert (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,398,146, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: , 2014 TY MANAGER TTEST: SRETARY GA/ED/SM CITY Of PRIM DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA ,9 2 2 60--2 5 7 8 TEL: 760 346-06i I info@cityofpalmdesemorg May 14, 2014 Shirley Medina Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3ro Floor Riverside, Califomia 92502-2208 Efn))ECEOWE uu MAY 16 2014 )\ J TRANSPOR ATIm uOMMISSION Subject: Project Status Report — Measure "A" Projects Prior Year Plan - Fiscal Year Ending (FYE) June 30, 2014 Dear Shirley, At the beginning of the 13/14 Fiscal Year, the City of Palm Desert had nine projects with Measure "A" funding. Of these nine projects, one has been completed and eight are being carried over to FY 14/15. The status of those eight projects is as follows: 1. Portola Interchange (a,1-10 This project_is in the environmental and preliminary engineering phase. NCR has been conditionally approved by FHWA. We are in the process of updating the environmental documents. We anticipate approval in the summer of 2015. Project funding is programmed for 2018. We are carrying over ,$123,322 of Measure A funds for ongoing obligations. 2. Monterey Avenue / I-10 Intersection Improvements Construction began March 2014 and is estimated to be completed in December 2014. Measure A funding of $8,590,410 is being carried over to FY 14/15. 3. Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Drive and Country Club Drive We are currently developing conceptual alignment plans for this project. Most of the west side of the project is within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Mirage. We continue to worts closely with them. $4,500,000 of Measure A funds are being carried over to FY 14/15. 4. Fred Waring Drive Right Turn Pocket at Hwv. 111 The design for this project is 99% complete; Right of Way (ROW) acquisition is complete. The City is preparing their documentation to send to Caltrans for ROW certification. Measure A funds of $564,835 are being carried over to FY 14/15. ;, rxdieo on uatt[o Pau Project Status Report May 14, 2014 Page 2 of 2 5. Street Resurfacing Construction is scheduled to begin July of 2014. Measure A funding in the amount of $2,767,697 is being carried over to FY 14/15. 6. Bridge Inspection Program) This project is in design -and Measure A funds in the amount of $100,000 are being carried over to FY 14/15. 7. ADA Curb Ramp Modifications This project is substantially complete. $49,668 of Measure A funds are being carried over to FY 14/15. 8. LED Indication Replacement Program This project has been awarded and will begin construction in July 2014. $50,000 of Measure A funds are being carried over to FY 14/15. Completed: 9. Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue Improvements Project was completed on January 23, 2014. Enclosed is the City of Palm Desert's Measure A Local Funds Program Project Status Report FY 2014 - 2015. The amounts in the "Measure A Funds" column are balances as of April 30, 2014. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (760) 346-0611, extension 469 or via email at mgreenwoodacityofoalmdesert.org. Sinc:, I Mark G = e wood, P.E. Director of ublic Works Enclosure cc: John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance CITY Of PDLDI DESERT 0 MINIM 041 UMW, r,9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-346.0611 Date: May 14, 2014 item No. Project Name f Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Portola Interchange @ 1-10 On-ramp/off-ramp construction 72,000,000 0 September 2018 In environmental and preliminary engineering phase 2 Monterey Avenue / 1-10 Interchange Improvements On-ramp/off-ramp construction 12,699,000 51,346 December 2014 Under construction Monterey Avenue Widening from 3 Fred Waring Drive to Country Club Drive (Update: from Magnesia Falls to Hoviey Lane last) Roadway Widening 6,500,000 0 June 2016 Developing conceptual alignment 4 Fred Waring Drive Right Turn Street Project 775,000 92,610 August 2015 Preparing documentation for Ca!trans for ROW 5 Pocket at Hwy 111 Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Improvements Street Project 3,123,000 2,000,794 January 2014 Certification , Complete 6 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Maintenance Project 3,500,000 1,533,744 October 2914 201>StrucOon to begin July 014 7 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 0 June 2014 In design 8 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 100,000 332 September 2014 Under construction 9 LED Indication Replacement Program Maintenance Project 53,000 0 July 2014 Construction to begin Jury 2014 TOTALS 98,850,000 3,678,826 (/ RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 1 of 5 Prepared by Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 14, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 21,957,222 $2,718,000 $24,675,222 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2014-2015 Monterey Avenue / 1-10 Interchange On-ramp/off-ramp 1 Improvements 12,699,000 8,590,410 Estimated carryover FY13/14 $8,590,410 construction Right Turn Lane - Fred Waring Drive to Hwy 2 111 Street Project 775,000 564,835 Estimated carryover FY13/14 $564,835 Right Turn Lane - Hwy 111 to Fred Waring 3 (northwest corner) Street Project 300,000 300,000 FY14/15 request $300,000 4 Highway 111 Sidewalk Infill FY14/15 request $85,000 Street Project 85,000 85,000 Portola Interchange at 1-10 On-ramp/off-ramp 5 Estimated Carryover FY13/14 $123,322 71,993,000 2,000,000 FY14/15 request $15,000,000 construction Street Resurfacing 6 Estimated Carryover FY13/14 $2,767,697 Maintenance Project 4,900,000 4,842,697 FY14/15 request $2,075,000 Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring 7 Drive to Country Club Drive Street Project 6,500,000 100,000 Estimated carryover FY13/14 $4,500,000 Traffic Signals - Accessible Pedestrian 8 Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 FY14/15 request $50,000 9 Citywide Street Striping FY14/15 request $200,000 Maintenance Project 200,000 200,000 Citywide Advanced Transportation 10 Management System (ATMS) Project Program 794,000 794,000 FY14/15 request $794,000 San Pablo Right Turn lane at Fred Waring 11 (southeast corner) Street Project 365,000 365,000 FY14/15 request $365,000 12 Gerald Ford East of Cook Improvements FY14/15 request $265,000 Roadway Improvements 265,000 265,000 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications 13 Estimated Carryover FY 13/14 $49,668 Maintenance Project 125,000 124,668 FY14/15 request 75,000 Bridge Inspection Program 14 Estimated Carryover FY13/14 $100,000 Maintenance Project 200,000 200,000 FY14/15 request $100,000 LED Indication Replacement Program 15 Estimated Carryover FY13/14 $50,000 Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 FY14/15 request $50,000 16 IISNS Upgrades Program FY14/15 request $75,000 Maintenance Project 75,000 75,000 17 Jefferson Street Interchange FY14/15 request $312,500 on-ramp/off-ramp construction 312,500 312,500 TOTALS 99.738.500 18,969,110 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page of 2 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 14, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 5,706,112 $2,800,000 8,506,112 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2015-2016 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Maintenance Project 3,500,000 1,900,000 1 Monterey Avenue Widening from Street Project 6,500,000 2,000,000 2 Fred Waring to Country Club Drive Traffic Signals -Accessible Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 3 Pedestrian Program Citywide Striping Maintenance Project 200,000 200,000 4 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 5 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 6 LED Indication Replacement Maintenance Project 100,000 50,000 7 Program IISNS Upgrades Program Maintenance Project 75,000 75,000 8 TOTALS 10,600,000 4,425,000 Agency: Page of Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 City of Palm Desert 3of5 Mark Greenwood 760-346-0611 May 14, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 4,081,112 $2, 884, 000 Item No. 2016-2017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 Project Name / Limits Street Resurfacing Maintenance Traffic Signals - Accessible Pedestrian Program Citywide Striping ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Bridge Inspection Program LED Indication Replacement Program IISNS Upgrades Program Cook Street Widening - Phase II Project Type Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Street Improvements Total Cost 3,500,000 50,000 200,000 75,000 100,000 50,000 75,000 6,100,000 6,965,112 Measure A Funds 1,900,000 50,000 200,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 75,000 3,655,600 TOTALS 10,150, 000 6,080,600 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page of 4 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 14, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 884,512 $2,971,000 3,855,512 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Maintenance Project 3,500,000 1,900,000 2 Traffic Signals -Accessible Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 Pedestrian Program 3 Citywide Striping Maintenance Project 200,000 200,000 4 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 5 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 6 LED Indication Replacement Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 7 IISNS Upgrades Program Maintenance Project 75,000 75,000 8 Cook Street Widening - Phase II Street Improvements 6,100,000 1,430,000 TOTALS 10,150,000 3,855,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page of 5 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 14, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 512 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $3,060,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 3,060,512 Item No. 2018-2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Project Name / Limits Street Resurfacing Maintenance Traffic Signals - Accessible Pedestrian Program Citywide Striping ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Bridge Inspection Program LED Indication Replacement Program IISNS Upgrades Program Cook Street Widening - Phase II Project Type Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Maintenance Project Street Improvements Total Cost 3,500,000 50,000 200,000 75,000 100,000 50,000 75,000 6,100,000 Measure A Funds 1,900,000 50,000 200,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 75,000 570,000 TOTALS 10,150,000 2,995,000 NMI Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 i City of Palm. Springs Department of Public Works and Engineering 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262 Tel: (760) 323-8253 • Fax: (760) 322-8360 • Web: www.palmspringsca.gov May 12, 2014 (Sent via e-mail with original to follow in the mail) Ms. Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3td Floor Riverside, CA 92502-22083 Re: Measure "A" Local Street & Road Program City of Palm Springs Annual Five -Year Measure "A" CIP (Fiscal Year 2014/15 - 2018/19) Dear Ms. Trevino: Enclosed, at RCTC's request, is the City's proposed Local Measure "A" Five -Year CIP Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014/2015 through 2018/2019, FY 2014/15 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement, and the Project Status Report for CIP Projects in FY 2013/14. As per requirements to participate in the Measure "A" Program, the City does participate in the MSHCP and TUMF programs. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 323-8253, extension 8732. Sincerely, ff8t/L---- David J. Barakian Director of Public Works/City Engineer Enclosures c: David H. Ready, City Manager Geoffrey Kiehl, Director of Financeffreasurer Nancy Klukan, Asst. Director of Finance Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT - CIP Projects FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian {by Savat Khamphou and Carrie L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 12, 2014 Item No. Project Name l Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources} 13/14 FY Measure A Funds (Expended) Estimated Completion Status 1 Alejo Road at Avenida Caballeros Traffic Signal (Design) ' Traffic Improvements $ 300,000 $0 June 2018 This project will be moved to the /7/18 fiscal year. 2 Aciva Caliente Museum Roadway on Hermosa Drive Roadway Improvements _ $ 1,300,000 $0 $ 32,050 June 2015 September 2014 June 2014 June 2016 Annually December 2015 Annually Fall 2014 June 2018 October 2017 Annually June 2018 September 2014 Done December 2018 TBD December 2015 June 2018 October 2014 Annually March 2020 RFA for Construction with Caltrans pending E-76, Project in Advertisement to open bids on June 3, 2014. This project is in Construction. Final Design Complete. Waiting for CON E-76 from Caltrans. On -going per inspection/recommendations by Caltrans. E-76 for Construction issued in April 2014. This project is on -going. This project is under Construction. E-76 for Pc received in August 2013. Begin Environmental, E-76 for PM received in April 2014. Begin Acquisition. This is an an -going reimbursement to CVAG. Contingent on City of Desert Hot Springs. Moved to 15116 FY. Study in Progress. This project is complete. CVAG Payment. Environmental Studies On -Going. Project not awarded. Next application cycle to begin 2015. RNd acquisition in progress. E-76 for PE received in August 2013. Begin Environmental. Design in progress. These projects are on -going. Environmental Studies On -Going. 3 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction Road Maintenance $ 800,000 4 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 650,000 $ 5,605 5 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge WideninglRehabilitation $ 5,00_0,000 $ 15.693 6 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 207,125 $ 825 7 Traffic MGMT Center/Citywide Traffic Signal interconnect Traffic Signal Improvements $ 2,100.000 $ 4,017 8 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $0 9 Date Palm Drive / 1-10 Interchange Widening Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 16,800,000 $ 284 10 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 4,557 11 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Gamet Ave including UPRR Brid_ge Widening) Roadway and Bridge Widening $ 21.250,000 $ 392 12 _ Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 13 North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dilllon (MOU with DHS) Street Improvements $ 600,000 $0 14 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance $ 250,000 $ 403 15 Ramon Road / I-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 15,000,060 $ 41,693 16 Ramon Widening Study @ WW Bridge Planning Study $ 32,000,000 $ 5,399 17 SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 13/14) Sidewalk Construction $ 90,000 $0 18 South Palm Canyon @ Arenas Wash (LWC) New Bridge . New Bridge $ 4,875,000 $0 19 South Palm Canyon @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 4 456 20 Sunrise Way at Ralph's Shopping Center Traffic Signal Installation $ 300,000 $ 17,652 21 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 190,000 $0 22 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 9,460 TOTALS S 208,910.5r $152,908,- r/ Note: For the following projects, construction is complete, however, no Measure A funds expended this year or requested for CIP FY 13/14, but invoices have not been finalized by implementing agencies. Gene Autry Trail/I-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 18,000,000 $ Done Construction is complete, but CVAG has not finalized invoice. Indian Canyon Dr/Interstate 10 Interchange Street Improvements $ 12,000,000 $ Done Construction completed, but Riv. Co. has not finalized invoice. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 12, 2014 **Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 6,978,353 Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,048,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014.2015 Projects: $ 9,026,353 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2014.2016 Agua Caliente Museum Roadway on Hermosa Drive Roadwaylmprovements $ 1,300,000 $ 102,000 Annual Overly & Reconstruction or Debt Service for the Same Road Maintenance $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction (Carried over from 13/14 FY) Road Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 800,000 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation $ 5,000,000 $ 275,000 Bride Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Traffic MGMT Center/Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect Traffic Signal Improvements $ 2,100,000 $ 188,000 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Date Palm Drive / I-10 Interchange Widening Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 16,800,000 $ 400,000 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation __$_ 5,973,000 $ 11,000 Farrell Drive / Vista Chino Traffic Improvements $ 450,000 $ 50,000 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave Including UPRR Bridge Widening) Roadway and Bridge, Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 20,000 Jefferson Street/ 1-10 Interchange (Proportionate Share) Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 612,500 $ 308,250 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 Pavement Condition Survey. Road Maintenance $ 250,000 $ _ 250,000 Ramon Road / 1-10 Interchange _ Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 15,000,000 $ 87,958 Ramon Widening Study @ WW Bridge Planning Study . $ 32,000,000 $ 60,000 Ramon Road Pvmt Rehab. from Sunrise to Compadre Road Maintenance $ 447,000 $ 51,000 SB 821 Sidewalk Project Sidewalk Construction $ 90,000 $ 30,000 South Palm Canyon @ Arenas Wash (LWC) New Bridge New Bridge $ • 4,87k000 $ 75,000 South Palm Canyon @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,185,000 $ 11,000 Sunrise Way at Ralph's Shopping Center Traffic Signal Installation $ 300 000 $ 300,000 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 200,000 $ _ 40,000 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 12,000 TOTALS $ 210,372,922 $ 4,829,630 ** Dollar amount derived by using end of FY balances and outstanding encumbrances available In the City's Finance Budget System RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2016 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 4,196,723 Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,109,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $ 6,305,723 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2015-2016 Road Maintenance _ $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction or Debt Service for the Same Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation $ 5,000,000 $ 200,000 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Date Palm Drive! 1-10 Interchange Widening Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 16,800,000 $ 400,000 E East Palm Canyon @ Palm Cyn Wash Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 11,000 Escoba East of El Cielo) Street Improvements $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Indian Canyon Drive UPRR Bridge Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave Including UPRR Bridge Widening) Roadway & Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 21,000 Jefferson Street I 1-10 Interchange (Proportionate Share) Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 612,500 $ 306,250 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 N North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dillon (MOU with DHS) Street Improvements $ 600,000 $ 200,000 R Ramon Widening Study @ WW Bridge Planning Study $ 32,000,000 $ 200,000 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian) Street Improvements $4,000,000 $ 150,000 S South Palm Canyon (a7 Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 11,000 Traffic Calming Program Traffic Improvements $ 50,000 $ 50,000 T Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 200,000 $ 40,000 V Vista Chino Bridge Whltewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 186,000 TOTALS $ 189,460,922 $ 3,585,672 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 2,720,051 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,172,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 4,892,051 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2016-2017 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction or Debt Service for the Same Road Maintenance $ 1,100,000 $ '1,100,000 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 600,000 $ 500,000 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Cyn Wash Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 4,000 Mesquite & El Cielo Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Installation $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dillon (MOU with DNS) Street Improvements $ 600,000 $ 200,000 Ramon Widening Study @ WW Bridge Planning Study $ 32,000,000 $ 400,000 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian) Street Improvements $3,600,000 $ 252,000 SB 821 Sidewalk Project Sidewalk Construction $ 90,000 $ 30,000 Sonora (East of Sonora Court) Street Improvements $ 80,000 $ 80,000 South Palm Canyon Drive a7 Arenas Wash (LWC) New Bridg_e $ 4,875,000 $ 402,000 South Palm Canyon @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 12,000 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 200,000 $ 40,000 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 72,000 TOTALS $ 150,543,422 $ 3,552,422 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 ..gency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8732 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,339,629 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $2,237,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 3,576,629 Item No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend In FY) 2017-2018 Alejo Road at Avenida Caballeros Traffic Signal Traffic Improvements $ 300,000 $ 50,000 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction or Debt Service for the Same Road Maintenance $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave including UPRR Bridge Widening) Road/Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 255,000 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dillon (MOU with DNS) Street Improvements $ 600,000 $ 200,000 Ramon Widening Study @ WW Bridge Planning Study $ 32,000,000 $ 400,000 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 200,000 $ 40,000 TOTALS . $ 56,010,422 $ 2,605,422 J RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: David J. Barakian (by Savat Khamphou and Carrie L. Rovney) Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext,8732 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 971,207 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,304,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 3,275,207 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost (Ail Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2018-2019 Alejo Road at Avenida Caballeros Traffic Signal Traffic improvements $ 300,000 $ 250,000 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction or Debt Service for the Same Road Maintenance $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 _ East Palm Canyon @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 143,000 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave including UPRR Bridge Widening) Road/Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 255,000 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 _ $ 10,422 Ramon Road Widening (Sunrise to El Cielo) Road Widening $ 4,000,000 $ 600,000 SB 821 Sidewalk Project Sidewalk Construction $ 90,000 $ 30,000 South Palm Canyon @ Tahguitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 143,000 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 200,000 $ 40,000 TOTALS $ 39,738,422 $ 3,221,422 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,498,732, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: ,.7—///1 , 2014 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: I 1,.RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PERRIS FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 May 7, 2014 CITY OF FERRIS HABIB MOTLAGII, CITY ENGINEER -'5-2,\ p, 4 ( .�.� �.• ��. -- u e, Theresia Trevino aw.SIa L;0U11TY Chief Financial Officer �' ��'I�nN;i�Mldlll: Riverside County Transportatio�'�C6 rlVsion P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn.: Grace Alvarez Re: FY 14-19 Measure "A" Improvement Plan, 2013-14 Status Report Enclosed, please find City of Perris proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed, please fmd an exhibit depicting the status of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE prepared by the Finance Department and signed by the City Manager. As noted on the status table, the Council implemented the paving of Mapes Road with local funds and Measure "A". This project was previously not included. in our plan; therefore we respectfully request the Commission to approve this project when adopting our next 5-Year Plan. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Habib M City Engineer DEPARTMENT OF ENGBIBBRING 170 WILKERSON AVE., suns D, PERRIS, CA 92570-2200 TEL.: (951) 943-6504 - FAX: (951) 94343416 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Measure "A" Expenditure Status 1 Perris Blvd. Improvements (Ramona Expressway to Perry) Widening Project completed and funded by other sources. 2 Perris Blvd. Improvements (San Jacinto Avenue to I-215 Bridge) Widening & Pavement Rehat---- ' 1,000 400 7 Design underway, construction to begin after completion of bridge work by RCTC 3 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 0 � 38 Design is underway, construction start Nov. 2014 4 Annual Pothole Repairs Pavement Maintenance 50 50 2 On -Going 5 1-215 Widening Project coordination with 250 250 16 On -Going RCTC _— — _ _._ __— __ _ — -_ Mapes Road New Pavement 450 100 100 Completed,. __ ___ ._ TOTALS 3,250 1,100 , 163 • This project was prioritized by City Council, Construction is Completed. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for the City of Perris that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,218,470, approved by the Commission at its July 2011 meeting, and that the City of Perris shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended -by -the -City of Perris for _l caLtranspOrtatiOn purposes The City of Perris hereby acknowledges that the failure of the City of Perris to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the City of Perris commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: Lai _. .2014 chard Belmud = , Cit , *eager ATTEST: Ron arr, Assistan ity * anager RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2019 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $2,954,000 $1,353,000 $4, 307, 000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Perris Blvd. Improvements from San Pavement Rehab. & 1,000 400 Jacinto Avenue to 1-215 Bridge Widening 2 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement maintenance 1,500 800 3 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement maintenance 50 50 4 1-215 Widening Project Oversight & 250 250 Coordination 5 "D" Street (4th to 11th) Pavement Rehab., Minor Landscaping & 1,200 100 Widening 6 4th Street (City Limits) Pavement Rehab. 1,000 200 TOTALS 5,000 1,800 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2019 Agency: City of Perris Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $2,507,000 $1,394,000 $3,901,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Perris Blvd. from San Jacionto Ave. to 5th Street Widening, right-of-way 2,500 1,000 2 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,800 800 3 Redlands Blvd. from San Jacinto Pavement Rehab. 700 400 Ave. to Rider TOTALS 5,000 2,200 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2019 Agency: City of Perris Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $1,701,000 $1,436,000 $3,137,000 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 1,000 2 Nuevo Road from Redlands to Widening & Pavement 1,200 300 Murrieta Rehab. 3 Nuevo Bridge New Bridge 4,000 1,000 TOTALS 6,700 2,300 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2019 Agency: City of Perris Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $837,000 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $1,479,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $2,316,000 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type otal Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 100 2 Ramona Expressway (City Limits) Pavement Rehab. 1,000 400 3 Perris Blvd. (City Limits) Pavement Rehab. 1,200 1,000 TOTALS 3,700 1,500 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 2019 Agency: City of Perris Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $616,000 $1,523,000 $2,339,000, Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (5000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 1,000 2 Placentia Avenue (1-215 to Indian) New Paving 600 600 3 Downtown Streets Pavement Maintenance 1,500 500 TOTALS 3,600 2,100 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 May 2, 2014 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: FY 2015-2019 Measure "A" Local Street and Roads Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Trevino: Attached are the Local Streets and Roads Program for Measure "A" Funds for FY 2015- 2019, project status report for prior year Plan (FY 2013/2014) and the FY 2014/2015 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. The City's maintenance of effort for FY 2014/2015 is $1,250,976, which exceeds our established maintenance of effort requirement of✓$674,811. The City's five-year Capital Improvement Program totals $12,570,000 ,and identifies Measure "A" local funds for the five-year plan totaling $7,570,000. /The Measure A Fund Balance is projected to be $515,823 as a result of the 5-year Program. The City currently carries a balance of approximately $3,435,823 in the Measure "A" Local Fund account. Therefore, with current and projected future allocations, adequate funds appear to be available for the plan. Attached is the City's status report for our prior year Plan FYE June 30, 2014. Please feel free to call me at (760) 770-3224 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Bruce B. Harry Jr. Director of Public Works Enclosures: Measure "A" FY 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan Project Status Report FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 MOE Certification Statement ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE FFOUSING AUTFFORITY PUBLIC LIBRARY PUBLIC WORKS Tel.1.760.324.4511 Tel.1.760.328.2266 Tel.1.760.770.3207 Tel.1.760.770.3210 Tel.1.760.341.7323 Tel.1.760.770.3224 Fax.1.760.324.8830 Fax.1.760.324.9851 Fax.1.760.324.0528 Fax.1.760.341.6793 Fax.1.760.341.5213 Fax.1.760.770.3261 69-825 FFIGH-WAY 111 / RANCI-FO MIRAGE, CA 92270 www.RanchoMirageCA,gov www.RelaxRanchoMirage.com FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Rancho Mirage (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $674,811, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: /1q7 // 2014 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: -Lau_ . SECRETARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 Citywide slurry and crack seal on various public streets Preventative Maintenance 250 193 Apr-14 Completed 2 Monterey Ave St. Improvements (Gerald Ford to Monterey) Widening/Reconstruction 1,200 49 Jul-14 Awaiting Envrmt. Clearance 3 Highway 111/Frank Sinatra Drive Intersection Improvements Safety and Capacity 1,800 0 Dec-14 PA&ED On -going 4 Desert Sun Ranch Street Improvements Widening/Reconstruction 800 490 Oct-13 Completed Administration of Programmed Projects Administration 25 25 Jun-14 On -going TOTALS 4,075 757 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015Projects: $3,435,823 $876.000 $4,311,823 11"m Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance 1,500 1,500 2 Monterey Avenue Street Improvements (Gerald Ford to Dinah Shore) (PA, ED, R/W) Widening/Reconstruction 1,200 350 3 Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Channel (PA, ED, & PSE) Replace Low Water Xing 1,300 50 4 Traffic Signal Coordination HSIP Grant Design and Construction Local Match (11.47%) Traffic Signal Coordination 2,000 470 5 Administration of Programmed Projects (8%) Administration 100 70 TOTALS 6,100 2,440 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $1,871,823 $902,000 $2,773,823 Iltem Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 Preventative Maintenance Replace Low Water Xing Administration 1,200 2,000 100 1200 500 72 1 2 3 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver. Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Channel (PSE) Administration of Programmed Projects (8%) TOTALS 3,300 1,772 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $1,001,823 S929,000 / $1,930,823 IItem ' Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance 250 250 2 Highway 111 (Country Club Dr to Magnesia Falls Dr) Pavement Reconstruction 1,250 750 3 Administration of Programmed Projects (8%) Administration 100 74 TOTALS 1,600 1,074 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $856,823 / 5957,000 $1,813,823 ----- Iltem 2017-201 8 1 2 3 Project Name I Limits Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Highway 111 (Country Club Dr to North City Limits) Administration of Programmed Projects (8%) Project Type Preventative Maintenance Pavement Reconstruction Administration TOTALS Total Cost ($000's) 1,000 1,500 110 2,610 Measure A Funds ($000's) 1,000 725 76 1,801 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 13, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $12,823 $986,000 $998,823 - IItem Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver. Preventative Maintenance 850 850 2 Administration of Programmed Projects (8%) Administration 110 78 TOTALS 960 928 MN Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF RIVERSIDE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 a n+ Of Public Works Department DECEIVER MAY 06 2014 RIVERSIDECOUNTY TRANSPORTATICOMMISSION Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3r1Floor Riverside, CA 92501 May 2, 2014 Attn.: Ms. Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Subject: Measure A Maintenance of Effort, CIP and Project Status Report Enclosed are the City of Riverside's FY 2014/15 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement, Measure A Local Funds Capital Improvement Program for FY 2014/15 through FY 2018/19 and a status report for FY 2013/14. If you have any questions, please contact Patrick Keeney at (951) 826-2406. Sincerel Thomas J. Boyd Public Works Director Attachments pmk 3900 Main Street • Riverside, CA 92522 • 951.826.5341 • fax 951.826.5542 • www.riversideca.gov • s Public Works Department May 6, 2014 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn.: Ms. Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Subject: Measure A Revised Project Status Report Enclosed is a revised status report for FY 2013/14. The two projects previously omitted through an oversight, Main Street — SR 60 to ls` Street and Multi -Agency Traffic Coordination have been added as projects 59 & 60. Both projects are complete. If you have any questions, please contact Patrick Keeney at (951) 826-2406. Sincerel , Thomas J. Boyd Public Works Director Attachments pink 3900 Main Street • Riverside, CA 92522 • 951.826.5341 • fax 951.826.5542 • www.riversideca.gov RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2013-14 Agency: City ofRiverside Page l of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 6, 2014 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 1 Arlington Ave - Fairhaven to West City Limit Traffic Safety Improvements 1,213 500 Design in progress. 2 Arlington Ave Rehab - Van Buren to SR 91 Street Resurfacing 2,100 *91 Design in progress. 3 Brockton Avenue Bike Lanes Street Rehabilitation & Restriping 1,792 384 Construction contract awarded in March *669 2014. 4 Collett Extension - Napa to Buchanan New Street Construction 4,985 *374 Construction contract awarded in February 2014. .5. Indiana - Vallejo to Auto Center Pavement Rehabilitation 2,050 240 Design in progress. 6 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,105 *420 Pending billing from school district. 7 Jurupa Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 *300 Design in progress. 8 Jurupa Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 5,528 *2 Construction complete. Required environmental mitigation still underway. 9 Major Street Rehabilitation 11/12 Street Resurfacing 731 *731 Project is complete. 10 Major Street Rehabilitation 13/14 Street Resurfacing 276 276 Design in progress. 11 Market St Arbor Repair s/o SR 60 Public Right -of -Way Repairs 50 50 Design in progress. 12 Market Street Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement 300 100 City contribution for County project. 13 Market St Slurry - Mission Inn Ave to 1st St Street Slurry 100 *100 Construction complete. Close out in process. 14 Miscelllaneous Railroad Project Management Grade Separations/Quiet Zones 480 _ 100 Ongoing project management. *30 *Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2013. a1Admin1CommonlMeasure of Effort\13 14 FY1Measure A Status 2014 revised 05062014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2013-14 Agency: City of Riverside Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May b, 2014 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST (S000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 15 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement 300 *100 City contribution for County project. 16 Paving Projects COP - Debt Serivice Street Paving 3,000 3,000 Annual debt service. 17 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Quiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 15,791 *7 Construction is underway. 18 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Quiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 4,120 *20 Design in progress. 19 Quiet Zone/BNSF/UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Quiet Zone for BNSF & UP Railroads 3,393 , 292 Design in progress. *73 20 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Quiet Zone for UP Railroad 1,700 200 Design in progress. 21 RR Grade Separation - Iowa Avenue Grade Separation - Iowa @ BNSF 31,686 *164 Construction is complete. Close out in process. 22 RR Grade Separation - Madison Street Grade Separations - Madison @ BNSF 35,000 - Project on hold pending availability of funding. 23 RR Grade Separation - Magnolia Avenue Grade Separation - Magnolia @ UPRR 51,118 *547 Project construction is complete. Outstanding right-of-way litigation pending. 24 RR Grade Separation - Mary Street Grade Separation - Mary @ BNSF 35,000 - Project on hold pending availability of funding. 25 RR Grade Separation - Riverside Avenue Grade Separation - Riverside @ UPRR 31,184 *445 Construction contract awarded in December 2013. *Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2013. G:\Admin\CommonlMeasure of Effort113 14 FY\Measure A Status 2014 revised 05062014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2013-14 Agency: Citv of Riverside Page 3 of S Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 6, 2014 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 26 RR Grade Separation - Streeter Avenue Grade Separation - Streeter @ UPRR 33,971 *1,297 Construction contract awarded in October 2012. 27 Railroad Grade Separations - Debt Service Grade Separations 107 *107 For debt service or allocation to specific projects. 28 SidewalkfTrail Construction 13/14 Sidewalk Construction 500 500 Design in progress. 29 Tequesquite Park Street Improvements Street Reconstruction/Improvements 1,050 *10 Project is complete. 30 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 8,000 *1,674 Design and right-of-way acquisition in progress. 31 Van Buren Blvd. Improvements - Wells to Street Resurfacing 2,578 *1,967 Construction contract awarded in June Jackson 2013. 32 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Indiana to South Street Widening 26,750 *78 Project on hold until funding is available. City Limit 33 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Jurupa to Santa Ana River Bridge Street Widening 1,605 *1,392 Construction contract anticipated to be awarded in May 2014. 34 Van Buren Blvd / 91 Frwy interchange Interchange Improvements 35,040 *5 Project construction is complete. Final right- of-way litigation and project close out pending. 35 14th/Martin Luther King - Market to 1-215 Signal Coordination - Funds transferred to another project. 36 Arlington - Van Buren to La Sierra Signal Coordination - - Funds transferred to another project. 37 Arterial Interconnections Signal Coordinations 501 - Current funding used for specific projects. *Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2013. a\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A Status 2014 revised 05062014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATIONCOMMLS4ION MEASURE STATUS AL FUN S' PROGRAM Apencv: City ofRiverside Pape 4 of 5 Prepared bv: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 .uut.e: Project No. muy V. 611JY PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MOOS) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 38 Brockton Protected/Permissive Left Turns Signal Modifications 100 100 Design in progress. 39 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Signal Coordinations 73 *1 On -going signal coordination work. 40 Fiber Optic Line to Caltrans Signal Coordination 86 - Project is complete. 41 Iowa - Citrus New Traffic Signal 250 *250 Construction contract awarded in October 2013. 42 Lincoln - St. Lawrence New Traffic Signal 250 250 Construction contract awarded in December 2013. 43 Magnolia - Jackson to Arlington Signal Modifications 90 50 *40 Construction contract awarded in November 2013. 44 Traffic Signal Revisions Signal Modifications 1,074 *502 Project is underway. 45 Miscellaneous Traffic Designs Traffic Projects Design 78 - Project is complete. 46 New Traffic Signals Signal Installation 203 *200 Project is underway. 47 SR2S - Jefferson/Madison Signals New Traffic & Pedestrian Signals 388 *43 Construction complete- Project close out in process. 48 University - Brockton to Campus Signal Coordination 50 50 Design in progress. 49 University - Fairmount New Traffic Signal 250 - Project moved to 2015/16. 50 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 Ongoing annual expenditure. 51 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 129 125 *4 Ongoing annual expenditure. * Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2013. GAAdmin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A Status 2014 revised 05062014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAIKSPORTATTON COMMISSION MF.A.SURF. "A" LOCAL. FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2013-14 Avencv: City of Riverside Pave 5 of 5 Prevared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 uate: may o, 4v14 Project TOTAL COST MEASURE A No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE MOOS) FUNDS (S000'S) STATUS 52 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 61 40 *21 Ongoing annual expenditure. 53 LED Signal Lenses Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 50 50 Ongoing annual expenditure. 54 Roadside Signs Replacement Ongoing Annual Expenditure 50 50 Ongoing annual expenditure. 55 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 Ongoing annual expenditure. 56 Traffic Management Center Signal Coordination 75 50 *25 Ongoing annual expenditure. 57 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 Ongoing annual expenditure. 58 Traffic Planning/Investigations Traffic Engineering 301 300 *1 Ongoing annual expenditure. 59 Main Street - SR 60 to 1st Street Street Resurfacing 1,683 - Project is complete. 60 Mufti -Agency Traffic Coordination Signal Coordination 784 *13 Project is complete. * Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2013. G:Wdmin\Common\Measure of Effortt13 14 FYWleasure A Status 2014 revised 05062014 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Riverside (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $12,449,203, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the. Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 1 , 2014 c'�.�N�1�v1•9�r�— IN MANAGERV{ ITY MANAGER ATTEST: VED AS TO FORM I NEY'S OFFICE ;ibi Attorney ,✓ Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 11, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 17,645 6,655 24,300 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Arlington Ave - Fairhaven to City Limit Traffic Safety Improvements 1,213 100 *500 2 Arlington Ave - Van Buren to SR 91 Street Resurfacing 2,100 2,000 *91 3 Brockton Avenue Bike Lanes Street Rehabilitation & Restriping 1,792 *1,053 4 Central Ave/UPRR Crossing Improvements Railroad Crossing Improvements 250 170 5 Collett Extension - Napa to Buchanan New Street Construction 4,985 *374 G:1Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 1 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 • Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 6 Indiana - Vallejo to Auto Center Pavement Rehabilitation 2,050 100 *240 7 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,105 *420 8 Jurupa Ave Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 *300 9 Jurupa Ave Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 5,528 "2 10 Magnolia Widening - Buchanan to Banbury Street Widening 6,331 301 11 Major Street Rehabilitation 13/14 Street Resurfacing 276 `276 12 Major Street Rehabilitation 14/15 Street Resurfacing 2,400 2,400 13 Market Street Arbor Repair s/o SR 60 Public Right -of -Way Repairs 50 *50 a\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A GIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 2 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 11, 2014 Item No. 2014-2015 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Project Name / Limits Market Street Bridge Replacement Market Street - Mission Inn to 1st Misc. Railroad Project Management Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Project Type City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Slurry Grade Separations/Quiet Zones City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Railroad Quiet Zone Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone Total Cost ($000's) 300 100 480 300 1,711 15,791 4,120 3,393 Measure A Funds ($000's) *100 *100 *130 *100 1,711 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. *7 *20 496 *365 G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 3 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 • Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 22 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Railroad Quiet Zone 1,700 *200 23 Railroad Grade Separation - Iowa Grade Separation 31,686 *164 24 Railroad Grade Separation - Magnolia Grade Separation 51,118 *547 25 Railroad Grade Separation - Riverside Grade Separation 31,184 *445 26 Railroad Grade Separation - Streeter Grade Separation 33,971 *1,297 27 Railroad Grade Separations - Debt Service Grade Separation 107 *107 28 Sidewalk/Trail Construction 13/14 Sidewalk Construction 500 *500 29 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 8,000 *1,674 30 Van Buren Improvements - Wells to Jackson Street Resurfacing 2,578 *1,967 G:1Admin\Common\Measure of Effort113 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 4 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2016 31 Van Buren - Indiana to South City Limit Street Widening 26,750 *78 32 Van Buren - Jurupa to Santa Ana River Street Widening 1,605 *1,392 33 Van Buren/91 Freeway Interchange Interchange Improvements 35,040 *5 34 3rd/Blaine Bike Lanes -Mulberry to Watkins Street Widening & Restriping 383 40 35 Arterial Interconnections Traffic Signal Coordination 541 40 36 Brockton Protective/Permissive Left Turns Traffic Signal Revisions 100 *100 37 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Traffic Signal Coordination 73 *1 38 Iowa - Citrus New Traffic Signal 250 *250 39 Lincoln - St. Lawrence New Traffic Signal 250 *250 G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 5 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 40 Magnolia - Buchanan to Third Traffic Signal Coordination 1,876 25 41 Magnolia - Jackson to Arlington Traffic Signal Modifications 90 *90 42 Traffic Signal Revisions Traffic Signal Modifications 1,224 150 *502 43 New Traffic Signals - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 453 250 *200 44 Rumsey - Central New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 45 Safe Routes to School-Jefferson/Madison Signals New Traffic Signals 388 *43 46 University - Brockton to Campus Traffic Signal Coordination 50 *50 47 University - Protected/Permissive Left Turns Traffic Signal Modifications 125 125 a\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 6 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 n..a..• n.,.;i ee ranee Item r No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 48 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 49 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 50 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 51 Traffic Management Center Traffic Signal Coordination 75 75 52 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 53 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 285,462 22,743 Indicates Measure A funding in prior fiscal years and not expended at 7/1/11. G:1Admin\Common\Measure of Effort113 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 7 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 11, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 1,557 6,855 8,412 Item No. Project Name / Limits 2015-2016 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 15/16 2 3 4 5 6 Market Street Bridge Replacement Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Project Type Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone Magnolia - Buchanan to Third Traffic Signal Coordination Total Cost ($000's) 2,400 300 300 3,000 3,393 1,876 Measure A Funds ($000's) 1,700 50 50 3,000 1,705 464 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort113 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 8 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 • Item r No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000%) Measure A Funds ( 00%) 2015-2016 7 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 315 315 8 University - Fairmount New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 9 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 10 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 11 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 12,309 8,009 G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 9 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 11, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 403 7,061 7,464 Item No. Project Name I Limits 2016-2017 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 16/17 2 3 4 5 6 Market Street Bridge Replacement Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Project Type Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision Total Cost ($000's) 2,400 300 300 3,000 3,393 315 Measure A Funds ($000's) 2,400 50 50 3,000 800 315 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 10 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 7 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 8 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 9 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 10 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 10,433 7,340 G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 11 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 11, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 124 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 7,273 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 7,397 Item No. Project Name / Limits 2017-2018 1 Canyon Crest - Country Club to Via Vista 2 3 4 5 6 Major Street Rehabilitation 17/18 Market Street Bridge Replacement Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service" Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Project Type Street Widening Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Total Cost ($000's) 6,000 2,400 300 300 3,000 1,700 Measure A Funds ($000's) 1,125 1,400 50 50 3,000 727 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. a\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 12 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: April11 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 7 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 315 315 8 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 9 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 10 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 11 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 14,740 7,392 G:1Admin1Common\Measure of Effort113 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 13 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 11, 2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 5 7,491 7,496 Item No. Project Name / Limits 2018-2019 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 18/19 2 3 4 5 6 Market Street Bridge Replacement Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Traffic Signal Improvements Project Type Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision Total Cost ($000's) 2,400 300 300 3,000 1,700 315 Measure A Funds ($000's) 2,400 50 50 3,000 749 315 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 14 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 • AA A� Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 7 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 8 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 9 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 10 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 8,740 7,289 G:\Admin\Common\Measure of Effort\13 14 FY\Measure A CIP 2015-2019 04112014 Page 15 of 15 Plan No. _Project Ward ST Type R4248M� Link 2 R4248 Link 5 6 R4253 Link 2 M R4253 Link 5 A R4253 Link 6 A R4253 Link 4 A R4265 Link 3 5 R4265 Link 3 5 R4275 Link 5 6 A R4275 Link 2 A R4275 Link 4 A R4275 Link 4 A ST CANYON SPRINGS PK JACKSON ST EL CERRITO DR JACKSON ST LA SIERRA AV MISSION GROVE PK Magnolia AV Magnolia Frontage CALIFORNIA AV CENTRAL AV COLE AV TRAUTWEIN RD I. 6; f A - Completed COP Arterials Start EASTRIDGE AV CALIFORNIA AV CENTRAL AV INDIANA AV DIANA AV CANYON CREST CR Jackson ST Jackson ST TYLER ST CANYON CREST DR VAN BUREN BL ALESSANDRO BL EOS Miles Rehab Type DAY ST 1.270 DGAC VAN BUREN BL 1.030 CIR CANYON CREST DR 0.313 DGAC LINCOLN AV 0.520 CIR SCHUYLER AV 1.148 DGAC CIR ALESSANDRO BL 1.880 DGAC Arlington AV 2.652 DGAC Arlington AV 0.980 DGAC VAN BUREN BL 1.100 DGAC CANYON CREEK DR 0.220 DGAC KRAMERIAAV 0.590 DGAC VAN BUREN BL 2.630 DGAC Completion Date 08/16/13 08/16/13 Plan No. Project Ward ST Type ST R4292 Link 4 A R4292 Link 12 A R4292 Link 2 A R4292 Link 1 A TBD-A Link 4 A TBD-A Link 1 A TBD-A Link 1 A TBD-A Link 3 A TBD-A Link 13 A TBD-A Link 5 6 A TBD-A Link 3 A TBD-A Link 1 A TBD-A Link 5 6 A TBD-A Link 5 6 7 A TBD-A Link 13 A CANYON CREST DR LINDEN ST MLK BL SPRUCE ST VAN BUREN BL LIME ST UNIVERSITY AV RIVERSIDE AV JURUPA AV MONROE ST LINCOLN AV MAIN ST ADAMS ST MAGNOLIA AV MAGNOLIA AV Future COP Arterials Start EOS ALESSANDRO BL VIA VISTA DR SR215 SR215 CHICAGO AV E'LY CITY LIMITS UNIVERSITY AV SR91 ARLINGTON AV PALM AV ARLINGTON AV VICTORIA AV SR60 MAGNOLIA AV W'LY CITY LIMITS ARLINGTON CANYON CREST DR CHICAGO AV RUSTIN AV WOOD RD KANE ST ORANGE ST CENTRAL AV VAN BUREN BL LINCOLN AV MARY ST COLUMBIA AV ARLINGTON AV JACKSON 14TH Mlles Rehab Type Completion Date 0.700 DGAC 0.510 DGAC 1.180 DGAC 0.740 DGAC 1.710. DGAC 0.540 DGAC 0.220 DGAC 0.530 DGAC 3.520 DGAC 2.470 DGAC 1.180 DGAC 0.700 DGAC 1.080 DGAC 4.210 DGAC 2.440 DGAC Completed COP Minors Plan No. Pra(ect Ward ST Type ST Start i EOS Mlles Rehab Type Completion Date R4252 Link 1 M BAHIA PL CAMPUS VIEW DR EOS 0.027 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 1 M CAMPUS VIEW DR BLAINE ST SANTA CRUZ DR 0.663 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 1 M CELESTE DR CAMPUS VIEW DR BLAINE ST 0.191 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Lin 1 M DONDERCT CAMPUS VIEW DR EOS 0.063 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 yialir 1 M GRAMPIONRD SHADY GROVE DR BLAINE ST 0.132DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 1 M INVERNESSST SHADY GROVE DR BLAINE ST 0.132DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 1 M MARAVILLA DR CAMPUS VIEW DR VALENCIA HILL DR 0.232 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 lid 1 M MARAVILLA DR SOMIS DR SANTA CRUZ DR 0.050 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 In 1 M SANDY GROVE DR VALENCIA HILL DR SOMIS DR 0.051 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 1 M SANTA CRUZ DR CAMPUS VIEW DR MARAVILLA OR 0.120 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 1 M SHADY GROVE DR SANTA CRUZ DR MT VERNON AV 0.151 SLURRY 11/14/13 R4252 las 1 M SOMIS DR SANDY GROVE DR MARAVILLA DR 0.067 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 1 M VALENCIA HILL DR CAMPUS VIEW DR BLAINE ST 0.1730GAG 11/14/13 R4252 Link l 5 _ M STOCKTON COURT LINCOLNAV EOS 0.099 DGAC 11/14/13 _ R4252 ink 6 M BURGE ST MAGNOLIA AV STARLIGHT CT ein DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 J.Ink 6 M CARRICKST KLOIBERST COCHRANAV 0,146,DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 6 M FOOTECT CARRICKST EOS 0.023 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 6 M FOOTECT SKOFSTAOST FURLONGST 0.05/ DbAL 11/14/13 R4252 Link 6 M FURLONG ST FOOTE CT EOS 0.038 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Lin 6 M KLOIBER ST BURGE AV REDONDO ST 0.144 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Lin 6 M MERCER AV BURGE ST ,COCHRANAV JONESAV 0.198 DGAC 11/14/13 14252 _ kink 6 6 M REDONDOST NLOIBERST 0.1 DGAC 11/14/13 114252 Llnik M STARLIGHT CT BURGE AV SKOFSTADST 0.115 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 7 M DAWN DR GOLDEN AVE DUNLOP DR 0.054 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Lid 7 M DUNLOP DR (1/2 WY TO DAWN) STILLWELL DR DAWN DR '_ 0.104 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 link 7 M GALVESTON DR GRAMERCYPL STILLWELL DR 0.055DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 7 M GRIDLEY WY GALVESTON DR EOS 0.110 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Link 7 M MICHELINDR DUNLOP DR GRIDLEY WY 0.099DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 �5n 7 M STILLWELL DR DUNLOP DR GALVESTON DR 0.080 DGAC 11/14/13 R4252 Lak 7 M TATE CT MICHELIN DR EOS 0.035 DGAC 11/14/13 R4260 Link 3 M AGNES PL REXFORD DR EOS 0.074 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 3 M CRYSTAL HILL ST MORN INGSIDEAV HILLSIDE AV 0.175 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 gni 3 M ESSEXST CENTRAL AV MAYBELLEST 0.3060GAC 11/18/13 R4260 link 3 M GLENHURSTST MORNINGSIDEAV HILLSIDE AV 0.203 °GAG 11/18/13 R4260 link 3 M GREEN VALLEY ST MORNINGSIDEAV HILLSIDE AV 0.123DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 3 M MORNINGSIDE AV ARLINGTONAV GLEN HURSTST 0.179 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 3 M MOUNTAIN VIEW AV JURUPAAV HILLSIDE AV 0.641DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 3 M REXFORDDR ROCHESTER DEWEYST 0.408DGAC 11/18/13i R4260 Link 5 M HARRISBURG PL LIMESTONE OR EOS 0.076 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 L)nk 5 M JAMESTOWN DR LIMESTONE DR EOS 0.101 DGAC 11/18/13� R4260 Link 5 M LIMESTONE DR MONROE ST GRATTON ST 0.280 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 5 M WOODHAVEN ST BELLA VISTA AV WALNUT GROVE AV 0.198 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 5 M YORKTOWN PL LIMESTONE DR EOS 0.041 DGAC 11/18/13 1/3 Completed COP Minas 9lwn4la. I 9td1ect 1 Vias.5 I WW1*, ISS ISMA IS.OS tWM% 19RltabS• iat ltym 'pp, QV* 1 R4260 gals 6 M ALITE WY HARTFORD CT GALLION CR 0,049 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Lilt 6 M DELLWOOD DR FILLMORE ST 160' EAST OF RAINFOREST DR 0.170 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 11.0k 6 M FLEETWOODDR DELLWOODDR INGLEWOODCT 0.159DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Lin 6 M FRUITWOOD DR GALLION CR INWOOD DR 0.104 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 6 M GALLION CR FRUITWOOD DR FLEETWOOD DR 0.207 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Unk 6 M GRANMERE CT FRUITWOOD DR EOS 0.115 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 6 M HARTFORDCT FLEETWOODDR EOS 0,203 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 LbLit 6 M INGLEWOODCT FILLMOREST EOS 0.095 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Ln 6 M INWOODDR FILLMOREST SAYWARDCR 0.337DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 tipic 6 M NUTMEG CIR WYBOURN AV EOS 0.087 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 link 6 M PHILLIP AV RUTLANDAV E05 0.100 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 6 M PICKWICKST WYBOURNAV EOS 0.085 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Link 6 M TORREYST WYBOURNAV EOS 0.087 DGAC 11/18/13 R4260 Lin 6 M WYBOURNAV FILLMOREST TORREYST 0.153 DGAC 11/18/13 R4262 Link 1 M FAIRMOUNTBL SECOND ST FIRST ST 0.075 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 1 M FAIRMOUNTBL THIRD ST SECOND ST 0.075 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 1 M FAIRMOUNTBL FOURTH ST THIRD ST 0.075 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 1 M FAIRMOUNTBL FIFTH ST FOURTH ST 0.075 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 link 1 M FAIRMOUNT BL SIXTH ST FIFTH ST 0.076 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 LiAs 1 M PINE ST UNIVERSITY AV MISSION INN AV 0.081 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 2 M CAMPUS VIEW DR MTVERNON AV EOS 0,152 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Lin 2 M LINDEN ST MT VERNON AV EOS 0,034 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Lilt 5 M DONOVAN CT TURLOCK DR EOS 0.084 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 kink 5 M FENWICK PL TURLOCK DR EOS 0.084 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Lntk 5 M GRATTON ST LINCOLN AV WILLIAMSBIRG PL 0.131 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 5 M LEATHERWOOD CT EOS TROPICANA DR 0.063 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 ,Link Link 5 M MONROE ST LINCOLN AV VICTORIA AV 0.266 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 1.1k 5 M SHALIMAR PL TURLOCK DR GRATTON ST 0.122 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 5 M SHALIMAR PL GRATTON ST EOS 0.100 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 link 5 M SPICEWOODLN EOS TROPICANA DR 0.063 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 ki_ak 5 M SULKY CT TURLOCK DR EOS 0.084 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Unk 5 M TROPICANA DR MONROE ST LEATHERWOOD CT 0.055 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 5 M TROPICANA DR LEATHERWOOD CT EOS 0.075 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Jig 5 M TURLOCK DR MONROE ST DONOVAN CT 0.052 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 link 5 M TURLOCK DR DONOVAN Cr FENWICK PL 0.051 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14. R4262 LILA 5 M TURLOCK DR FENWICK PL SULKY CT 0.051 ARAM DGAC _ 03/17/14 R4262 Link 5 M TURLOCK DR SULKY Cr SHALIMAR PL 0.052 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Ilnk 5 M WILUAMSBURG PL GRATTON ST EOS 0.100 ARAM DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Unk 7 M ANAHEIMST GOLDEN AV BOLIVAR ST 0.067 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 jatk 7 M BOUVAR ST BLEEKER CT DOHENY DR 0,060 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Lin 7 M BOUVARST CAMPBELLAV REDDIFORDCT 0.055 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Lin 7 M BOLIVAR ST DOHENY DR KIPLING CT 0.052 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 7 _ M BOLIVAR 5T KIPLING CT PECAN PL 0.060 DGAC 03/17/14 2/3 6, WI, f 4- Completed COP Minors Plan No. Project Ward ST Type ST Start EOS Miles Rehab Type Completion Date R4262 Lin 7 M BOLIVAR ST PECAN PL ANAHEIM ST 0.049 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 link 7 M BOLIVAR ST REDDIFORDCT BLEEKERCT 0.054DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Ids 7 M DOHENY DR GOLDEN AV BOLIVAR ST 0.085 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 7 M KIPLING CT EOS BOLIVAR ST 0.043 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 lid 7 M PECAN PL EOS BOLIVAR ST 0.035 DGAC 03/17/14 R4262 Link 7 M REDDIFORDCT EOS BOLIVAR ST 0.088 °GAG 03/17/14 3/3 FUTURE COP MINOR STREETS PROJECTS Plan No. Project Ward ST Type ST Start EOS Miles Rehab Type Completion Date 1415M3 Link 1 M ORANGE ST T �THIRDST FIFTH ST 0.151 DGAC 1415M1 fink 2 M PARK AV AV ST 'VICTORIA PLEASANT ST PROSPECT AV !VICTORIA INST !VICTORIA UM ST DATES ST f 0314611103 ST HOWARDAV HORACE ST FOURTEENTH ST EOS 0.774 1415M1 WA 2 M FOURTEENTH ST EOS 0.629 1415M3 110k 2 M AV HOWARDAV 0.291 1415M1 Link_ 2 M COMMERCE ST HOWARDAV 0.095 1415M3 Sink 2 M AV HOWARDAV 0.297 1415M3 Link 2 M AV COMMERCE ST 0387 1415M1 Lid 2 M VICTORIA AV COMMERCE ST 0.388 1415M1 2 M VICTORIA AV COMMERCE ST 0.388 1415M1 l n 2 M `-FOURTEENTH ST EOS 0.476 1415M1 Sink 2 M PLESANTST EOS 0.352 1415M1 lid 3 M ARMNGTON AV LINCOLN AV 0.365 DGAC 1415M3 laic 3 M HAVERHILLCT HORACE ST _ EOS 0.115SLURRY 1415M1 i�ik, 3 M WESTRIDGERD HORACE ST LINCOLN AV 0.288DGAC 1415M1 __. 3 M LUCERNE PL WESTRIDGE RD EOS 0.091 DGAC 1415M1 Unk 3 M BELHAVEN PL HORACE ST EOS • 0.043 DGAC 1415M1 link 3 M DUQUESNE ST WESTRIDGERD BALFOREST 0.097 DGAC 1415M3 j 41k 3 M SANDBERG ST DUQUESNE ST LINCOLN AV 0.106 DGAC 1415M3 fink 3 M BALFORE ST ADMANAAV BRANIGAN WY BRANIGAN WY COOK AV COOK AV COOK AV JORDAN DR JUPITER DR KENYON CT MEREDITH ST MEREDITH ST MOBLEYAV CHALLEN AV DUQUESNE ST LINCOLN AV 0.106 DGAC 1415M1 Link 6 M MEREDITH ST EOS 0.143 1415M1 Onk 6 M MEREDITH ST JUPITER DR 0.101 1415M1 ijiLk 6 M MOBLEYAV MEREDITH ST 0.166 1415M3 Link 6 M CHAMPAGNE CT TYLER ST 0,104 1415M1 Link 6 M MEREDITH ST CHAMPAGNE CT 0.051 1415M1 LIJr_k 6 M MOBLEYAV MEREDITH ST 0.178 1415M1 tint 6 M JUPITER DR MEREDITH ST 0.097 1415M1 Link 6 M BRANIGAN WY JORDAN DR 0.107 1415M1 Link 6 M MEREDITH ST EOS 0.045 1415M1 ti.d 6 M ADRIANAAV COOK AV 0.121 1415M1 Ilk 6 M BRANIGAN WY ADRIANA AV 0.161 1415M3 Link 6 M COOK AV CAUFORNIAAV 0.279 1415M1 Link 6 M VAN BUREN BL WELLS AV 0.863 1415M1 Lk 6 M -_ ORLANDO DR CHALLEN AV WARREN ST 0.145 1415M1 ijnk 6 M CITADEL CT WARREN ST EOS 0.090 1415M1 Link 6 M TEMECULA PL WARREN ST EOS 0,090 1415M3 Link 6 M GALWAYCT WARREN ST EOS 0.090 1415M1 Lin 6 M SILVERADO PL WARREN ST E05 0.090 1415M3 Lin 6 M REMINGTON DR CHALLEN AV _ _ EOS 0.176 1415M3 iW. k 6 M MODESTO DR WARREN ST EOS 0.104 1415M1 Lin 6 M DANIEL DR CHALLEN AV MODESTO DR 0.105 1415M3 Link 6 M NOBLE ST CHALLEN AV WELLS AV 0.396 1415M1 Link 6 M RED ROCK AV NOBLE ST EOS 0.133 1415M1 Link 6 M ROCKHURSTCT FLAGSTONE AV EOS _ 0.087 1/3 �x L o FUTURE COP MINOR STREETS PROJECTS KM RIM ` PriklxE Word STtype ST Slut Ea5 Mira RYIailiTYpii [UonplltSunDEle 1415141 —%anis 5 M FLAGSTONE AV RED BLUFF110 _ NOUS57 CAM AV 0492 1415611 .1.111k 5 M FLAGSTONE AV RED NOCRAV Claif WW1 1./36. 6 M CAMELOTRD CRAW AV RED BLUFFRD 0.199 1419hd1 Ll � d M BURNHAMCT CAMELOTRD EDS G042 1113611 Ni BOARDWALK DF CAM CALF+IHILLDII PQ32S 1419Fd1 I�r 6 6 h1 BpLiONAV :r•ROWALK4El OWA4K CODE AV 0.237 7 M M {INAIYAV_ CADBURYOl ECS 015E I1415M1 'maw. lid 7 19E1fileVST EDS E05 6127 1413611al1 7 M BLACF;T3ERRYpk HTIICLtl1l DSRAYfOR CAT 0_110 241%11 7 81 4LM1Tmo(No SPANFGFIELOST EOS GAM 111911 1112 7 M CADBURYOR MERIDIAN WY HAMMST 0-142 14151111 I619k T M CATSPAW DR 54A3353 RL EDS _ 0.:b7 0,1TIF 11$M1 Rd 7 IA CLAR4CT HEATHCWCD1I 'EDS 1425511 1415M1 7 11 ODOLWATEROq ARJUNGYOTiAV YEARLING ST EMT PATO 1.11$ _ 7 FA FAIRHAVENDA —T ARLIMPOiliAV AINSLEYAV 1415h11 9OA 7 IA M HEATfiCLIFF DM SWEETWATER DR _ RLINGTON AV AAINSLEYA9 0,251 141SM1 7 MEGANLN BEN7LEYST cow 1416ML ✓ON 7 M MERICIANWY RAIRHAVENDR jCFABURI'4R 0,P94 1nSMI � 7 M 'PLATTEOR SARINGFI LOST ,S MM. 1416111 8 7 hi 51AME5E FL HFA INCLIFF DR CAT5RAW DR 0.11,4 W5 /3 Fla 7 h1 SPRINGFIELDST YUCCA DR SWEETWATER DR al% 1i15FrI1 Link 7 hi SWEETWATER aR ARLINGTONAV NEATIra f DR 0,170 1915ail yell # RI 5iNE31501/SF 13E71THYST AINSLPYAV a.112 1415M1 LA.11 7 _ _ Ai _ 3/1 ^TEA/103457 TARDY C7 SIAMESE RI. _ CAMAYPR fAS ELM 1415111 Lluk 7 YUCCA OR 13,1O7 1415M1 Jail 7 M %%MCA671 YEARUNGST SPRINGFTRZST QUA 1415M2 Li& 2 M k1ULWAYST MISSION INN AV Uk11VER311YAV claim MAC 1415M2 a 3 M EkAZE1/041757 CHAPALAST E05 0107 DOM 1415h17 IA t3 M 5(110VTCIEAV PRINCE ABUT DIA ARROYO DM• 0369 141Skf2 Jrilli 3 h1 COLU7ABL15AV LAURAAV 14RIUPAAV 43.95DEIAC 1415M2 AIJI9 M JASMINE ST JIJRVPAAV INDUSTRMiAW EMI! AC 1415h12 3 Hl ORDWAYST JUR{,Jp',yAV COLUMBUSAII O.175VOW 1415M2 ,M3 1.41 3 TA iIRROAMYST WDVSTRIALAV EDS 03115'4GAC 1415512 }id 3 M REP176LIe5T 1U11UYAAM 9011.049USAV D.1130GAC 1415M3. 1110 3 iA REMILICST I1YD41SfRIALAY MS O,iNrOGAC 14115M2 }llA 3 _ IA IM7usurALAV JASMINE ST Flamm 0,255 0GWC 1415M2 1,13 3 M1 4AGE57 0OLUMBUSAV E05 G.D31 MAC 1AEN% 1.14 3 M AC3RN57 MIRAAV CENT31ALAV 0.23206.0JC ;425�A2 g 3 h1 vAWtlINESSAV IIURLFPAAV a.21f7 DBAC — Loam LA 3 h1 WILDECKSSAV �DElaTEALAY __ 1UgLIFAAV 1E1 5 0.2¢3 DGAC 14 on tin sh 2 liuk 3 hf EDPERAKST WILDERNESS AV EDS 0.117${MAC O.1 SSIUREIY 4 3 h1 GRIFFM-1ST INDUSTRIAL AV DENNYFL _ 1415M2 Link 3 M DEhNEYFL GRIFFITH ST FREMONTST 0AN➢SLURRY 2/3 6; 4. 0. A - FUTURE COP MINOR STREETS PROJECTS Plan No. Project Ward ST Type ST Start EOS Mlles Rehab Type Comptetton Date 1415M2 Link 3 M FREMONTST JURUPAAV INDUSTRIAL AV 0.216SLURRY _ 1415M2 Lila 3 M INDUSTRIAL AV FREMONTST EOS 0.184SLURRY 1415M2 Li k 3 M YELLOWSTONE DR ARUNGTON AV YOSEMITE WY 0.418 5.4151i1 14/:6 3 N, 5Ari51WIEDitWf NkOCK1OAt>t0 SJEATUini DAM 1415M2 LiLlk 3 M NELSON ST BROCKTONAV DEANZAAV 0.160 1415M2 Ma 3 M TAHOE CT YELLOWSTONEDR_ EOS 0.033 1415M2 k lc 3 M YOSEMITEWY WeiThr.0Pl CAMELIADR EILEENST EILEENST ;GARFIELD ST ;MELODY IN • RD 'PADEN ST REESST 'ST GEORGEPL I 57PAULPL VERBENA DR VIA SAN JOSE VIA SAN JOSE VIA SAN LUIS VIA SAN LUIS BUCK PL CANTERBURY RD DEGHER CT FAIRBURN CT MADRONARD MADRONARD-CAUFORNIAAV MESCALE RD SYCAMORE AV VIA SAN JOSE -SYCAMORE VIA SAN JOSE WAYNEST YELLOWSTONEDR DEANZAAV 0.099 1415M2 5 M ADAMSST EOS 0.102 1415M2 Link 5 M ADAMSST CANTERBURYRD 0.227 1415M2 Lin i 5 M CAUFORNIAAV VERBENA DR 0.257 1415M2 guElli 5 _CANTERBURYRD M GARFIELD ST CAUFORNIAAV 0.258 1415M2 Ur 5 M M CALIFORNIA AV CAMELIADR 0.289 1415M2 Link. S MONROEST MELODYLN 0.160 1415M2 Link 5 M GARFIELD ST HICKORY LN 0.035 1415M2 Lin 5 M 1MESCALE M CALIFORNIA AV EOS 0.131 1415M2 Link 5 GARFIELD ST CALIFORNIA AV 0.258 1415M2 l I 5 M M IRWIN,0R GARFIELD ST CAUFORNIAAV 0.258 1435M2 Link 5 ARGUSCT CAUFORNIAAV 0.318 1415M2 kink 5 M CALIFORNIA AV EOS 0.247 1415M2 Link 5 M CALIFORNIA AV EOS 0.247 1415M2 Mk, 5 M ADAMS ST CANTERBURY RD 0.216 1415M2 Q 5 M VIA SAN LUIS CALIFORNIA AV 0.183 1415M2 Link 5 M CALIFORNIA AV ARLINGTONAV 0.283 1415M2 ij_nk 5 M VIA SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA AV 0.235 1415M2 Link 5 M CALIFORNIA AV ARLINGTONAV 0.248 1415M2 Link 5 M MESCALE RD EOS 0.028 1415M2 WI 5 M GARFIELD ST CALIFORNIA AV 0.258 1415M2 Link 5 M MESCALE RD E05 0.025 1415M2 lid 5 M MESCALE RD EOS 0.025 1415M2 tjtik 5 M GARFIELD ST CALIFORNIA AV 0.258 1415M2 Link 5 M EOS 0.131 1415M2 WS 5 M GARFIELD ST CALIFORNIA AV 0.258 1415M2 LIFJI 5 M •STGEORGEPL SYCAMORE AV CALIFORNIA AV 0.228 1415M2 Link 5 M •STPAULPL SYCAMORE AV CAUFORNIAAV 0.228 1415M2 Link 5 M ST PAUL PL VIA SAN JOSE 0.121 1415M2 Una 5 M AV GARFIELD ST 0.056 1415M2 Link 5 M GARFIELDST EOS 0.105 1415M2 Ink 5 M GARFIELD ST CAUFORNIAAV 0.258 3/3 I i Exhibit A Requested I Rating Street Boundaries 3.0 Branigan Wy (10434) Mobley 3.0 Camelia Dr (8276) Adams Cantebury 3.0 Clarendon Ct (6125) Wimbledon Dr 3.0 Cypress Harold 3.0 Dawes St (3940) Magnolia Av EOS 3.0 De Grazia Rd Hawarden Dr Karendale 3.0 Dewey Av (5426) Rhonda Rd Rexford 3.0 Discovery Wy (11363) Fensmuir 3.0 Doyle St (3279) Indiana 3.0 Garfield St Shelby Dr 3.0 Gratton St (1508) Monroe 3.0 Killarney Dr Kilkenny Dr 3.0 Mercer Av (10854) Burge St 3.0 Montclair Dr Central Av Rochester 3.0 Mull Av (10394) Tyler 3.0 Nelson St Brockton Av De Anza 3.0 Nettleton Ct (1330) Danbrook Dr 3.0 Poplar St (3502) Orange Lime 3.0 Quadrille Ct (1505) Equestrian Dr 3.0 Saratoga St (3019) Walnut Grove 3.0 Saturn Cir (4878) Wells 3.0 Thistle Ct (2031) Academy 3.0 Wainwright Ct (5217) Central Av 3.0 Wayman St (5589) Phoenix Public Works - Streets Division Paving List - Existing and Additional Neighborhoods Paving List - PMI Score of 2.9< and Management Added Streets. Exhibit A ARD PROJECT q STREET ••• BOUNDARIES ••• 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 f4-ii 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 7 14-1 7 14-8 7 14-B 7 14-8 6 14-G 6 14-G 6 14-G 6 14-G 6 14-G 2 14-A- ON HOLD 2 14-A ON HOLD 2 14-A ON HOLD 2 14-A - ON HOLD 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 14-H - ON HOLD 2 14-H - ON HOLD 2 14-H - ON HOLD 2 14-H - ON HOLD 2 14-H -ON HOLD Hlllandale Ct (300) Goodrich Dr. Goodrich Dr. E. Big Springs Rd E. Big Springs Rd Colina Wy La Mart Dr Monte Carlo Ct Monte Vista Dr (1204) Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr BAUTISTA ST MIGUEL ST RONALD ST DAVID ST hHri lYclSi RONALD ST DAVID ST LELAND AV COOLIDGE AV YARBOROUGH DR YARBOROUGH DR TURNINGBEND WY TURNINGBEND WY WESTFIELD DR EDWARDS PL EDWARDS PL EDWARDS PL LYNCH LN Commerce St Cottage St Denton St Grove Av MEGGINSON LN HAROLD ST MONTGOMERY ST PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR FORD PL BAGGETT DR MERCURY CT QUENTON DR MOBLEY AV CLARIDGE DR CLARIDGE DR BAYLOR PL GROSSMONT DR GROSSMONT DR BALLINGER PL ATWATER AV DORSET DR DORSET DR DORSET DR LAYTON CT WALLINGHAM DR MILLARD DR MILLARD OR MILLARD DR MILLARD DR MC HARG RD MC HARG RD EISNER AV PARK AV PARK AV PARK AV PARK AV GROVE AV Goodrich Dr E. Big Springs Rd Hillandalte Ct. Mt, Vernon Ave. Goodrich Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Or Chapala Castile Colina Wy Monte Carlo Ct Le Conte Dr La Mart Dr LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV Et7$ EOS EOS MARY ST MARY ST GOLDEN AV DOLE CT YARBOROUGH DR EOS ARIZONA AV EOS LYNCH LN WESTFIELD DR EDWARDS PL Mission Inn BI Victoria Av Victoria Av Date St MAGNOLIA AV CYPRESS AV CYPRESS AV HOLE AV BAGGETT DR MERCURY CT QUENTON DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR HOLE AV VIA VISTA DR BAYLOR PL EOS EOS BALLINGER PL GROSSMONT DR BALLINGER PL FILLMORE ST LAYTON CT WALLINGHAM DR EOS MILLARD DR FILLMORE ST MC HARG RD WALLINGHAM DR MUMFORD AV EDS EISNER AV MC HARG RD DATE ST IRIS ST WOODBINE ST EOS DATE ST EOS Hlllandale Ct, EOS Goodrich Dr. EOS EOS El Cerrito Dr EOS Castile Colina Wy Monte Carlo Ct Le Conte Or La Mart Dr Canyon Crest Dr MARGUERITA AV MARGUERITA AV MARGUERITA AV MARGUERITA AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV RONALD ST RONAI.D ST DOLE CT TURNINGBEND WY GOLDEN AV YARBOROUGH DR EISNER AV LYNCH LN WESTFIELD DR MILLARD DR MUM FORD AV Third St Park Av Commerce St Cridge St EOS ARLINGTON AV EOS BAGGETT DR MERCURY CT QUENTON DR EOS EOS CALIFORNIA AV EOS BROOKWYPL CALIFORNIA AV BAYLOR PL WIMBLEDON DR CLARIDGE DR BALLINGER PL CLARIDGE DR ATWATER AV OMEGA ST LAYTON CT WALLINGHAM DR DURHAM DR DORSET DR DORSET DR MC HARG RD WALLINGHAM DR EDWARDS PL EDWARDS Pt EISNER AV MILLARD DR WESTFIELD DR CRIDGE ST DATE ST IRIS ST WOODBINE ST CRIDGE ST TOTAL LANE MILES 0.120 0.081 0.060 0.066 0.185 0.071 0.130 0,096 0.127 0,103 04/14/14 0.039 0.060 0.098 0.060 0.265 0,265 0.265 0.265 0.131 04/28/14 0.131 0.131 0.155 0.155 0,221 0.12.9 06/02/14 0.062 0,077 0.131 0.057 0.066 06/16/14 0.052 0.052 0.304 0.205 HOLD 0.387 0.096 0.149 0.234 0.062 0.082 0.056 0.048 06/30/14 0.082 0.042 0.141 0.033 0.088 0.112 0.163 0.116 0.033 0.066 07/28/14 0.091 0.048 0.129 0,051 0.048 0.055 0.076 0.127 0.054 08/18/14 0.045 0.059 0.052 0.075 0.101 0.052 0.082 0.082 0.066 0.131 0.096 PAVING LIST - 2014, START WEEK COMMENTS 03/31/14 HOLD On -hold for RPU project n e • h On -hold for RPU project 11 Public Works - Streets Division Paving List - Existing and Additional Neighborhoods Paving List - PMI Score of 2.9< and Management Added Streets. Exhibit A 'ARD PROJECT 11 STREET """ BOUNDARIES 2 14-H - ON HOLD 2 14-H - ON HOLD L 14-H-ON HOLD 14-1 5 14-1 5 14-1 5 14-1 5 14-1 5 14-1 5 14-1 4 14-EEE 4 14-EEE GROVE AV GROVE AV GROVE AV VANCE ST LUCAS ST DOYLE ST DIANA AV ROSLYN ST DIANA AV Gilberto Av Gratton St Gratton St IRIS ST WOODBINE ST E05 INDIANA AV VANCE ST LUCAS ST ROSLYN S T DIANA AV CROWELL AV Diana Av Heather in Monroe St DATE ST IRIS ST WOODBINE ST LUCAS ST DOYLE 5T INDIANA AV GAY WY HELENA AV ROSLYN ST EOS Hermosa Dr HeatherLn PAVING LIST - 201A TOTAL LANE MILES START WEEK COMMENTS 0.068 0.066 0.045 0.214 0.063 09/15/14 0.214 0.060 0.119 09/29/14 0.126 0.054 0'444 10/6/14 0.180 9.572 Will schedule for end of season Will schedule for end of season Miles Public Works - Streets Division Paving List - Existing and Additional Neighborhoods Paving list - PM; Score of 2.9< and Management Added Streets. Exhibit A ,iARD PROJECT IT STREET '•• BOUNDARIES ••• 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-GG 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB Z 14811 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 2 14-BB 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 3 14-D 7 14-B 7 14-B 7 14-0 7 1443 6 14-G 6 14-G 6 14-G 6 14-G 6 14-G 2 14-A - ON HOLD 2 14-A - ON HOLD 2 14-A - ON HOLD 2 14-A ON HOLD 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 6 14-C 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 2 14-E 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F G 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 6 14-F 2 14-H - ON HOLD 2 14•H -ON HOLD 2 14-H -ON HOLD 2 14-H - ON HOLD 2 14-H - ON HOLD Hillandale Ct (MO) Goodrich Dr. Goodrich Dr. E. Big Springs Rd E. Big Springs Rd Cotina Wy La Mart Dr Monte Carlo Ct AduP+.e.tlttxa.4S i=I64S Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr BAUTISTA ST MIGUEL ST RONALD ST DAVID ST MIGUEL ST RONALD ST DAVID ST LELAND AV COOLIDGE AV YARBOROUGH DR YARBOROUGH DR TURNINGBEND WY TURNINGBENO WY WESTFIELD DR EDWARDS PL EDWARDS PL EDWARDS PL LYNCH LN Commerce St Cottage St Denton St Grave Ay MEGGINSON LN HAROLD ST MONTGOMERY ST PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR FORD PL BAGGETT DR MERCURY CT QUENTON DR MOBLEY AV CLARIDGE DR CLARIDGE DR BAYLOR PL GROSSMONT DR GROSSMONT DR BALLINGER PL ATWATER AV DORSET DR DORSET DR DORSET DR LAYTON CT WALLINGHAM DR MILLARD DR MILLARD DR MILLARD DR MILLARD DR MC HARG RD MC HARG RD EISNER AV PARK AV PARK AV PARK AV PARK AV GROVE AV Goodrich Dr E. Big Springs Rd Hillandalte Ct. Mt. Vernon Ave. Goodrich Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr Monte Vista Dr C4ayala Castile Cotina Wy Monte Carlo Ct Le Conte Dr La Mart Dr LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV EDS EOS EOS MARY ST MARY ST GOLDEN AV DOLE Cr YARBOROUGH DR EDS ARIZONA AV EOS LYNCH LN WESTFIELD DR EDWARDS PL Mission Inn BI Victoria Ay Victoria Ay Date St MAGNOLIA AV CYPRESS AV CYPRESS AV HOLE AV BAGGETT DR MERCURY CT QUENTON DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR PALMENTO DR HOLE AV VIA VISTA DR BAYLOR PL EOS EOS BALLINGER PL GROSSMONT DR BALLINGER PL FILLMORE ST LAYTON CT WALLINGHAM DR EOS MILLARD DR FILLMORE ST MC HARG RD WALLINGHAM DR MUMFORD AV EOS EISNER AV MC HARG RD DATE ST IRIS ST WOODBINE ST EOS DATE ST EOS Hillandale Ct. EOS Goodrich Dr. EOS EOS El Cerrito Dr EOS C.r.Vi e Cotina Wy Monte Carlo Ct Le Conte Dr La Mart Dr Canyon Crest Dr MARGUERITA AV MARGUERITA AV MARGUERITA AV MARGUERITA AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AV RONALD ST RONALD ST DOLE CT TURNINGBEND WY GOLDEN AV YARBOROUGH DR EISNER AV LYNCH LN WESTFIELD DR MILLARD DR MUMFORD AV Thir d St Park Av Commerce St Cridge St EOS ARLINGTON AV EOS BAGGETT DR MERCURY CT QUENTON DR EOS EPS CALIFORNIA AV EOS BROOKWY PL CALIFORNIA AV BAYLOR PL WIMBLEDON DR CLARIDGE DR BALLINGER PL CLARIDGE DR ATWATER AV OMEGA ST LAYTON CT WALLINGHAM DR DURHAM DR DORSET DR DORSET DR MC HARG RD WALLINGHAM DR EDWARDS PL EDWARDS PL EISNER AV MILLARD DR WESTFIELD DR CRIDGE ST DATE ST IRIS ST WOODBINE ST CRIDGE ST TOTAL LANE MILES 0.120 0.081 0.060 0.066 0.18S 0.071 0.130 0.096 P,.S11 0.103 04/14/14 0.039 0.060 0.098 0.060 0.265 0.265 0.265 0.265 0.131 04/28/14 0,131 0,131 0.155 0.155 0.221 0:129 06/02/14 0.062 0,077 0.131 0.057 0.066 06/16/14 0.052 0.052 0.304 0.205 HOLD 0.387 0.096 0.149 0.234 0.062 0.082 0.056 0.048 06/30/14 0.082 0.042 0,141 0.033 0.088 0.112 0.163 0.116 0.033 0.066 07/28/14 0,091 0.048 0.129 0.051 0.048 0.055 0.076 0.127 0.054 08/18/14 0.045 0.059 0.052 0.075 0.101 0.052 0.082 0.082 0.066 0.131 0.096 PAVING LIST - 2011 START WEEK COMMENTS 03/31/14 HOLD O-frid.for tPU project On -hold for RPU projc, Public Works Streets Division Paving List - Existing and Additional Neighborhoods Paving List - PMI Score of 2.9< and Management Added Streets. s�ARD PROJECT # 7 5 s 5 5 5 4 4 a-tl-ONrr -C: 14-11 ON HOLD 14-1i - ON HOLD 14-1 14-1 14-I 14-1 14.1 14-1 14-1 14-EEE 14-EEE 2 14-AA -ENGINEERING 2 14-AA - ENGINEERING 3 14-CC 3 14-CC 3 14-CC 3 14-CC 3 14-CC 3 14-CC 3 14-CC 2 14-DD 2 14-DD 2 14-DD 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE-ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE-ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE-ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-EE - ENGINEERING 2 14-FF 2 14-FF 2 14-HH 2 14-HH 5 14-II 5 14-11 5 14-II 6/7 14-11 6/7 14-1J STREET GROVE AV GROVE AV GROVE AV VANCE ST LUCAS ST DOYLE ST DIANA AV ROSLYN ST DIANA AV Gilberto Av Gratton St Grafton St IRIS ST WOODBINE ST EOS INDIANA AV VANCE ST LUCAS ST ROSLYN ST DIANA AV CROW ELL AV Diana Av Heather In Monroe St Exhibit A *" BOUNDARIES "* DATE ST IRIS ST WOODBINE ST LUCAS ST DOYLE ST INDIANA AV GAY WY HELENA AV ROSLYN ST EOS Hermosa Dr Heather In TOTAL LANE MILES 0,066 0.066 0.04S 0.214 0.063 0.214 0,060 0.119 0.126 0.054 0.444 0.180 9 572 START WEEK 09/15/14 09/29/14 10/6/14 Blazewood (1285) Blazewood (1285) Blanchard PI(5035) Capistrano Wy Montclair Dr. Montdair Dr. Rochester PI St. James Ct Burnside Ct Century Atriga 1,,... Century Av Century Av Fair Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Falr Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Fair Isle Dr Lochmoor Dr Lochmoor Dr Lochmoor Dr Lochmoor Dr Lochmoor Dr Lochmoor Dr Thornhill Dr Stoneykirk Dr Kyle Ct Rowan Dr Christie Dr Applecross Dr Applecross Dr Applecross Dr Applecross Dr Via Campeche Windhill Dr Rancho Dr(2492) Prospect Ave Viewcrest Ln (2971) Summerfield Ln Cody Ct Wells Ave. Wells Ave. 5 5 5 14-AAA 14-AAA 14-AAA PMI SCORE - 2.9< AND DEPARTMENT REQUEST PER T.BOYD Chapala Dr Lyndhurst Dr 0.147 Lyndhurst Dr EOS 0.059 Montclair Dr EOS 0.186 Central Av Blanchard PI 0.063 Central Av Blanchard PI 0.063 Blanchard PI EOS 0.125 Montclair Dr EOS 0.132 Rochester PI EOS 0.079 Rochester PI EOS 0.070 Claridge Dr Shaker Dr 0.234 Shaker Dr Promontory In 0.152 Promontory in Westview Dr 0.107 Sycamore Canyon Blvd. Lochmoor Dr 0.094 Lochmoor Dr Applecross Dr 0.153 Applecross Dr Kendrick Dr 0.111 Kendrick Dr Matheson Dr 0.041 Matheson Dr Abernathy Dr 0.086 Abernathy Dr Speyside Rd 0.083 Speyside Rd Abernathy Dr 0.129 Abernathy Dr Hallberry Dr 0.190 Hallberry Dr Lochmoor Dr 0.130 Lochmoor Dr Haddington Dr 0.029 Fair Isle Dr Allendale Dr 0.233 Allendale Dr Kirkmichael Cir 0.075 Kirkmichael Cir Christie Dr 0.112 ENGINEERING Christie Dr Rowan Dr 0.121 Rowan Dr Fair Isle Dr 0.090 Fair Isle Dr Sycamore Canyon Blvd 0.271 Applecross Dr Stoneykirk Dr 0.108 Applecross Dr Thornhill Dr 0.092 Applecross Dr EOS 0.031 Applecross Dr Lochmoor Dr 0.057 Applecross Dr Lochmoor Dr 0.037 Fair isle Dr Kyle Ct 0.112 Kyle Ct Rowan Dr 0.084 Rowan Dr Christie Dr 0.116 Christie Dr EOS 0.066 Le Conte Wlndhill 0.137 Vla Campeche Cherry Hill Dr 0.177 Sedgwick High 0.250 Sedgwick Ave East to EOS 0.159 Arizona Av EOS 0.089 Arizona Av E05 0.082 Arizona Av E05 0.103 Tyler St Jones 0.282 Jones Hole St 0.689 6.033 ENGINEERING PAVING LIST - 2014 COMMENTS Will schedule for end of season Will schedule for end of season Miles Hayes St Hayes St Myers St DEPARTMENT ADDITIONS - LLOWERY, T.HUANG Van Buren Blvd Roosevelt St Hayes St Roosevelt St Myers St Magnolia Av 0.127 0.124 0.076 Public Works - Streets Division Paying List - Existing and Additional Neighborhoods Paying List - PMI Score of 2.9< and Management Added Streets. ARD PROJECT B STREET 5 14-AAA 5 14-BBB 5 14-BBB 5 14-BBB S 14-BBB 5 14-BBB 5 14-BBB 5 14-BBB 5 14-BBB 5 14-BBB 7 14-CCC 3 14-CCC 3 14-CCC 3 14-CCC 3 14-CCC 3 14-CCC 3 14-CCC 3 14-CCC 3 14-ODD 3 14-DDD 3 14-DDD 3 14-DDD 3 14-DDD 3 14-DDD Tdt St Eileen St Eileen St Eileen St Janis St Marie St Marie St Coleman St Coleman St Coleman St Highcliff Rd Highcliff Rd Highcliff Rd Cliff Ct Gibraltar Dr Gibraltar Dr Gibraltar Dr Hillary Ct Rockwell Rd Oleander Ct Karendale Cir De Grazia Rd Da Vinci Dr Skye Dr Hayes St Garfield St Janis St Marie Eileen St Adams St Janis St Adams St Matte M Gates PI Pachappa Dr Cliff Ct Gibraltar Dr highcliff Rd Pachappa Dr Hillary Ct highcliff Rd Gibraltar Dr Hawarden Dr Hawarden Dr De Grazia Rd Hawarden Dr Hawarden Dr Hawarden Dr Exhibit A "' BOUNDARIES "' Magnolia Ay Janis St Marie St EOS Marie St Janis St Eileen St Matte PI Gates Pi Eileen St Cliff Ct Gibraltar Dr EOS EOS Hillary Ct Highcliff Rd EOS EOS EOS EOS De Grazia Rd Hawarden Dr EOS EOS TOTAL LANE MILES 0.078 0.050 0.050 0.076 0.185 0.065 0.124 0.054 0.053 0.082 0.069 0.081 0.033 0.025 0.084 0.051 0.119 0.019 0.105 0.141 0.331 0.323 0.094 0.110 2,727 PAVING LIST • 2014 r START WEEK COMMENTS TOTAL 18.332 itiln i Mil MEN Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 May 12, 2014 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department Ms. Shirley Medina Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 S. Lemon St., Third floor Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Measure A local Streets and Roads Program Dear Ms. Medina: Juan C. Perez, P.E., T. E Director Patricia Ramo, P.E. Assistant Director Attached is the County's five-year program of projects for the County's portion of Measure A funds for Fiscal Year 2015/2019. The County's Transportation Department receives no general funds and no certification of MOE is included. Also attached is a copy of our Fiscal Year 2014/2018 plan with comments addressing project status, project additions and delays. We have scheduled expenditures based on revenue projections. These projects are incorporated in the County's proposed Fiscal Year 2013/2014 — 2014/2015 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) which is planned for Board approval. We will inform your agency of any changes that occur to the Measure A program due to future revisions of the County's TIP. If you have any questions concerning this program, please feel free to contact me at (951) 955-6740. Sincerely, Patricia Romo Assistant Director of Transportation RKN: attachments cc: Rebecca Carr Glenn Higa/Roy Null (transmittal only) 4080 Lemon Street, 8"' Floor Riverside, California 92501 (951) 955-6740 P.O. [lox 1090 • Riverside, California 92502-1090 • FAX (951) 955-3198 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 ADOBE DR: 605' E Rio Vista Dr — Reconst AC paved road 107 107 6/30/14 Scheduled 3 1116' W Rio Vista Dr 2 ALESSANDRO AVE: Artesia Ave -- Resurf AC paved road 500 500 Complete 3 Ramona Expy 3 ALLEN AVE: Leon -- Naumann Ave Recon AC paved road 97 97 6/30/14 Scheduled 3 4 APACHE TR/ 1-10 INTERCHANGE: Seminole Dr -- Main St Const Roundabouts at 2 off/on ramp intersections 7 7 Complete 5 5 BLACKWELL BLV: Sutherland Ave — Resurf AC paved road 71 71 Complete 1 Grand Ave 6 BRIGGS RD: Augie Ct -- N'ly 0.41 mi Realign AC paved roads to ultimate alignment 4066 64 Complete 3 7 BRIGGS RD: Barn Rd — Install Traffic Signal 266 91 FY 15 Awarded 3 8 BRIGGS RD & BAXTER RD: -- Loan Payback for road improvements built 450 180 FY 17 Ongoing 3 9 BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD: Auld Const AC paved road 16883 6 Tasks Complete 3 Rd -- Murrieta Hot Sprgs Rd 10 CABAZON AREA RESURFACING Resurf AC paved road 1754 35 FY 16 Ongoing Design 5 GROUP: 13 Various Streets -- 11 CAJALCO RD: Alexander St -- Install Traffic Signal 633 102 Pending Closeout 1 12 CAMINO DEL SOL AREA GROUP Resurf AC paved road 574 6 FY 15 Ongoing Design .• • 2: 2 Area Streets -- 13 CHIP SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT Chip Seal 684 500 Complete 3 ROADS FY13/14: various roads -- 14 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT Chip Seal 493 400 Complete 5 ROADS FY13/14: various roads -- 15 CITRUS VIEW CIR: Suttles Dr-- Resurf AC paved road 31 29 Complete 1 443' E Suttles Dr 16 CORTEZ CT: Adobe Dr -- 255' SE Reconst AC paved road 17 17 Complete 3 Adobe Dr 17 DE PORTOLA RD: E. Benton Rd -- Resurf AC paved road 54 26 Complete 3 E. Benton Rd 18 EARTHMOVER CIR: Temescal Resurf AC paved road 28 26 Complete 1 Canyon Rd -- 318' SW Temescal 19 EVELYN WAY: Stetson Ave -- Reconst AC paved road 55 52 Complete 3 Frances St 20 FRANCES LN: Evelyn Wy— San Reconst AC paved road 94 91 Complete 3 Jacinto St 21 GILMAN SPRINGS RD: N'ly Resurf AC paved road 2927 1299 Complete 5 Eucalyptus 0.03mi -- SEIy Alessandro 0.56mi 22 GRANT ST: Indiana Ave -- Magnolia Ave Const curb, gutter & sidewalk on SW side 475 299 Complete 2 23 INDIAN TRUCK TR INTERCHANGE: 1-15 — Widen I.T.TrI, Ichg ramps and const signals 8860 201 Complete 1 24 JULIE LN: Allen Ave -- 482' S Allen Reconst AC paved road 30 30 6/30/14 Scheduled 3 Ave 25 LEON RD: Keller Rd — Scott Rd Adjust AC road profile 2854 108 Complete 3 26 LESTER CIR: Temescal Canyon Rd Resurf AC paved road 54 52 Complete 1 - 635'SW Temescal Cyn Rd 27 MAGNOLIA AVE: Lincoln St— Buchanan St Const grade separaton at BNSF RR 54131 3 FY 16 Under construction 2 28 MARCELLA LN: Evelyn Wy -- San Reconst AC paved road 72 70 Complete 3 Jacinto St 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 MARKET STREET BRIDGE: Santa Ana River -- MESA RD: Calle Campo -- De Portola Rd PACHEA TRAIL AREA: 4 various roads — PALAMINO PL: King Ave -- 470' E KING AVE PATS POINT DR: Lawson Rd -- 760' NE Lawson Rd PIGEON PASS RD: Hidden Springs Dr — Center St RIDER ST: Haines SUS -- Brown St RIM RD: Rio Vista Dr -- Adobe Dr RIO VISTA DR: Mayberry Ave -- Adobe Dr RIVERSIDE COUNTY BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: Various locations -- Countywide RUDELL RD: Ontario Ave -- W'ly 0.23 mi SAGE RD - 2 SEGMENTS: Red Mnt Rd -- NIy Red Mnt Rd .62 mi SPEED WARNING SIGNS: 5 Various Locations — SPRADLIN LN: Allen Ave -- 508' S Allen Ave STALLION PL: 445' W King Ave -- King Avenue STALLION PL: King Ave -- 455' E King Ave SUNNY AVE: Julie Ln — 351' W Julie Ln SUNSET TR: 258' E Saddleback Rd -- 489' W Saddleback Rd SUTTLES DR: Rancho Escondido Dr — Tava Ln TAVA LN: King Ave -- 568' E King Ave TENAJA RD: Clinton Keith Rd -- Sierra Ellena VAN BUREN BLVD: Washington St- - Wood Rd VAN BUREN BLVD BRIDGES: Santa Ana River — VIEJO DR: Rim Road -- 746' Ely Rim Rd WHITTIER AVE: Yale St -- Cornell St WHITTIER AVE: Yale St -- Cornell St Replace bridge Reconst AC paved road Resurf AC paved roads Resurf AC paved road Resurf AC paved road Construct portions and widen to 4 lanes Resurf AC paved road Reconst AC paved road Reconst AC paved road Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds Reconstruct AC paved road Reconst AC paved road Install solar -powered speed feedback signs Reconst AC paved road Resurf AC paved road Resurf AC paved road Reconst AC paved road Resurf AC paved road Resurf AC paved road Resurf AC paved road Reconst AC paved road Widen AC paved road to 6 lanes Replace existing bridges Reconst AC paved road Resurf AC paved road Const sidewalk on Sly side W. of Columbia 42093 1 351 346 622 621 33 31 54 53 836 10 220 158 143 143 157 157 819 225 519 10 740 100 527 7 28 28 29 29 32 32 22 22 53 51 51 47 50 47 1056 955 7092 41 36216 1246 44 44 522 4 882 128 TOTALS 189,458 9,005 FY 18 6/30/14 6/30/14 FY 16 FY 15 FY 15 FY 15 6/30/14 6/30/14 FY 16 6/30/14 FY 15 FY 15 Ongoing PA&ED Complete Complete Complete Complete Tasks Complete Complete Scheduled Scheduled Ongoing Design Ongoing Design Ongoing Design Ongoing construction Scheduled Complete Complete Scheduled Complete Complete Complete Complete Ongoing Design Complete Scheduled Awarded Awarded 2 3 3 1 1 5 1 3 3 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 115 Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,112 / Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $ 5,227 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2014-2015 1 BEAUVIEW DR: Oak Creek Rd -- Oak Reconst AC paved road 83 83 5 View Ln 2 BRIGGS RD: Barn Rd -- Install Traffic Signal 266 175 3 3 BRIGGS RD & BAXTER RD: -- Loan Payback for road improvements built 450 85 3 4 CABAZON AREA RESURFACING Resurf AC paved road 1754 847 5 GROUP: 13 Various Streets -- 5 CAMINO DEL SOL AREA GROUP 2: 2 Resurf AC paved road 574 152 1 Area Streets -- 6 CHERRY OAK RD: Oak Glen Rd -- Oak Reconst AC paved road 72 72 5 Creek Rd 7 CHIP SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS Chip Seal 566 566 1 FY14/15: various roads -- 8 CHIP SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS Chip Seal 751 751 3 FY14/15: various roads -- 9 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip Seal 551 317 5 FY14/15: various roads -- 10 EAST BENTON RD: Calle Jojoba W -- Calle Jojoba E Reconstruct AC paved road 293 293 3 11 FRONTAGE RD: Rainbow Canyon Rd / N -- San Diego C.L. Resurf RMS paved road 258 258 3 12 OLD STATE HWY: Green Ave -- SH 74 Resurf AC paved road 497 37 3 13 RAINBOW CANYON RD: Frontage Rd / N - - San Diego C.L. Resurf RMS paved road 243 243 3 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2014-2015 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: Various locations -- Countywide Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds 819 60 3 15 SAGE RD - 2 SEGMENTS: Red Mnt Rd -- Reconst AC paved road 740 640 3 Nly Red Mnt Rd .62 mi 16 SPEED WARNING SIGNS: 5 Various Locations -- Install solar -powered speed feedback signs 527 48 1 17 TEMESCAL CANYON RD (EXTENSION): I- 15 -- Park Canyon Rd Realign and widen AC paved road 481 2 1 18 VAN BUREN BLVD: Washington St -- Wood Rd Widen AC paved road to 6 lanes 7092 37 1 19 WHITTIER AVE: Yale St -- Cornell St Resurf AC paved road 522 518 3 20 WHITTIER AVE: Yale St -- Cornell St Const sidewalk on Sly side W. of Columbia 882 43 3 TOTALS 17,421 5,227 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,265 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $ 5,265 --' Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2015-2016 1 BRIGGS RD & BAXTER RD: -- Loan Payback for road improvements built 450 5 3 2 CABAZON AREA RESURFACING Resurf AC paved road 1754 675 5 GROUP: 13 Various Streets -- 3 CONTRERAS RD: Johnson Rd -- Resurf RMS paved road 327 327 3 S.H. 371 4 EL SOBRANTE RD: Cajalco Rd -- Recon AC paved road 3,240 230 1 Mc Allister Rd 5 JOHNSON RD: Contreras Rd -- Hill Resurf RMS paved road 259 259 3 St 6 MITCHELL RD: Kirby Rd -- Wly Resurf RMS paved road 143 143 3 Bohlen Rd 0.11 mi 7 MITCHELL RD: Bautista Rd -- Regal Resurf RMS paved road 376 376 3 Blue Tr 8 OLD STATE HWY: Green Ave -- SH Resurf AC paved road 497 460 3 74 9 PALA RD: Temecula C.L. -- San Recon AC paved road 220 220 3 Diego C.L. 10 SAN TIMOTEO CYN RD: W Resurf AC paved road 800 800 5 Railroad X-ing1.39mi -- Beaumont 11 VINELAND ST: Edgar Canyon Construct box culvert 570 570 5 Channel -- 12 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 3 Pavement Rehab 13,601 1,200 3 Only -- TOTALS 22,237 5,265 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,423 i Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 5,423% item I No. Project Name /Limits Project Type Total Cost measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2016-2017 1 BRIGGS RD & BAXTER RD: -- Loan Payback for road improvements built 450 180 3 2 EL SOBRANTE RD: Cajalco Rd -- Recon AC paved road 3,240 3,010 1 Mc Allister Rd 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 3 Pavement Rehab 13,601 2,233 3 Only -- TOTALS 17,291 5,423 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,586 1.-''' Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 5,586 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost measure A Funds supv. Dist. 2017-2018 1 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 1 Only -- Pavement Rehab 5,257 2,050 1 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 3 Only -- Pavement Rehab 13,601 2,836 3 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 5 Only -- Pavement Rehab 3,576 700 5 TOTALS 22,434 5,586 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ - Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,754 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 5,754 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost measure A Funds supv. Dist. 2018-2019 1 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 1 Only -- Pavement Rehab 5,257 1,900 1 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 3 Only -- Pavement Rehab 13,601 2,950 3 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 5 Only -- Pavement Rehab 3,576 904 5 TOTALS 22,434 5,754 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,229 Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,007 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $ 3,236 • Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2014-2015 1 60th AVE: Pierce St -- Buchanan St Resurf RMS paved road 147 147 4 2 60th AVE: Buchanan St -- Lincoln St Resurf RMS paved road 170 170 4 3 AVENIDA FLORENCITA: Camino Aventura -- Camino Campanero Const curb, gutter & sidewalk on east side 308 21 4 4 CASCADIA DR: Cecina Way -- Carter Ln Reconst AC paved road 53 53 4 5 CECINA WAY: 41st Ave -- Cascadia Drive Recon AC paved road 51 51 4 6 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip Seal 1,361 757 4 FY14/15: various roads -- 7 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip Seal 551 234 5 FY14/15: various roads -- 8 CIENEGA PL: Cascadia Dr -- 227' S Reconst AC paved road 24 24 4 Cascadia Dr 9 LINCOLN ST: 7th St -- 62nd Ave Resurf AC paved road 1,323 1,053 4 10 MONTEREY AVE AT I-10: C.L. Palm Desert -- N'ly Varner Rd 0.1 mi Realign/Add W.bound ramps, Widen Varner 326 15 4 11 PIERCE ST: 60th Ave -- 58th Ave Resurf RMS paved road 180 180 4 12 PORTOLA AVE 1-10 INTERCHANGE: Const new interchange 30 10 4 Between Monterey Av IC -- Cook St IC 13 WORSLEY RD: Dillon Rd -- Pierson Blvd Resurf RMS paved - road 521 521 5 TOTALS 5,045 3,236 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,067 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $ 2,067 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2015-2016 1 BENNETT RD: Dillon Rd -- Sly 1.12 mi Resurf RMS paved road 247 247 4 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 2,500 500 4 3 Z" FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Pavement Rehab 13,701 1,320 4 Only -- TOTALS 16,448 2,067 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ - Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,129 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 2,129 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2016-2017 1 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 2,500 650 4 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Pavement Rehab 13,701 1,479 4 Only -- TOTALS 16,201 2,129 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Coachella Valley Region $x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,193 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,193 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 1 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 2,500 700 4 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Pavement Rehab 13,701 1,493 4 Only -- TOTALS 16,201 2,193 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ - Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,259 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 2,259 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 1 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 2,500 700 4 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Pavement Rehab 13,701 1,459 4 Only -- 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 5 Pavement Rehab 3,576 100 5 Only -- TOTALS 19,777 2,259 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 66TH AVE: Harrison St (old SH86) -- Install Traffic Signal 1636 71 Complete 4 2 AVENIDA FLORENCITA: Camino Aventura -- Camino Campanero Const curb, gutter & sidewalk on east side 308 83 Closeout Pending 4 3 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT Chip Seal 1,782 1,102 Complete 4 ROADS FY13/14: various roads -- 4 CLIFF ST: Adams St-- 618' E Reconst AC paved road 62 62 6/30/14 Complete 4 Adams 5 DELTA ST: Adams St -- 623' E Recon AC paved road 63 63 Complete 4 Adams St 6 DUNE LAKE ST: Adams St— 618' E Reconst AC paved road 62 62 Complete 4 Adams St 7 EL CENTRO WY: Calle Helene — Resurf AC paved road 71 71 Complete 4 Monte Vista 8 EMERALD CREST DR: Washington Reconst AC paved road 68 68 Complete 4 St — Yucca Lane 9 HAYES ST: 70th Ave — 68th Ave Reconst RMS paved road 333 333 6/30/14 Scheduled 4 10 LINCOLN ST: 7th St — 62nd Ave Resurf AC paved road 1,323 87 FY 16 Ongoing Design 4 11 MONTEREY AVE AT I-10: C.L. Coordination for 326 20 FY 15 Ongoing Coordination 4 Palm Desert -- N'ly Varner Rd 0.1 mi Realign/Add W.bound ramps, Widen Varner Rd 12 PORTOLA AVE 1-10 Const new interchange 30 15 FY17 Ongoing PA&ED 4 INTERCHANGE: Between Monterey Av IC -- Cook St IC 13 SAN MIGUELITO DR: Ramon Rd — Resurf AC paved road 63 63 Complete 4 La Canada Wy 14 SLURRY SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT Slurry Seal 1,014 1,000 Complete 4 ROADS FY12/13: various roads -- TOTALS 7,141 3,100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 14TH AVE: De Frain Blvd — Alon Resurf RMS paved road 230 222 6/30/14 Scheduled 4 Ave 2 ARROWHEAD BLVD: N'ly 14th Ave ResurfAC paved road 180 4 FY 15 Scheduled 4 0.04 mi -- 1-10 3 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT Chip Seal 1,437 644 Completed 4 ROADS FY12/13: various roads -- 4 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT Chip Seal 1,782 680 Completed 4 ROADS FY13/14: various roads -- 5 CHUCKWALLA VLY RD: 22915' SE Resurf RMS paved road 594 521 Completed 4 Corn Springs — 33475' SE Corn 6 SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES: — Develop Plans of 190 89 FY 15 Ongoing Design 4 Action" for 2 bridges TOTALS 4,413 2,160 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: 249 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 15 264 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2014-2015 1 04TH AVE: Hunter Ave -- SH 95 Resurf RMS paved road 94 94 4 2 ARROWHEAD BLVD: N'ly 14th Ave -- I-10 Resurf AC paved road 180 170 4 TOTALS 274 264 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Palo Verde Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $ x 1,000 0 256 256 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2015-2016 1 PALO VERDE AREA: various roads Resurf RMS paved road TOTALS 810 256 4 810 256 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Palo Verde Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ x 1,000 0 264 264 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost measure A Funds 5upv. Dist. 2016-2017 Resurf RMS paved road 810 264 4 1 PALO VERDE AREA: various roads -- TOTALS 810 264 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Palo Verde Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ x 1,000 0 272 272 item No Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 Resurf RMS paved road 810 272 4 1 PALO VERDE AREA: various roads -- TOTALS 810 272 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/9/14 Palo Verde Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ x 1,000 0 280 280 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 Resurf RMS paved road 980 280 4 1 PALO VERDE AREA: various roads -- TOTALS 980 280 MEN Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 IIMPOI11111111 rr SAN jACINTO May 22, 2014 Theresia. Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn.: Grace Alvarez, Planning 86 Programs Manager Re: FY 14-19 Measure "A" Improvement Plan 86 2013-14 Status Report Enclosed, please find City of San Jacinto proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed, please find an exhibit depicting the status of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE prepared by the Finance Department and signed by the City Manager. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Habib Motlagh City Engineer City Engineer's Office 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue . San Jacinto, CA 92583 . Ph (951) 654-3592 Fax (951) 654-3728 www.d.san-jacinta.ca.us FY 2014-15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of San Jacinto (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No, 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $156,391, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 21, 2014 CITY MANAGER ATTES L--• C LERK RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013.2014 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Habib Motiagh Phone #. (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Item No: Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (6000's) Measure "A" Expenditures to Date Measure "A"' Funding Status 1 Traffic Signal Device Traffic Control 163 0 38 On -Going Ramona Expressway Pavement Design underway, expect 2 Rehab. (Lake Park to Esplanade) Pavement Rehab. 385 0 276 14/15 construction S Warren Road Pavement Rehab. Pavement Rehab. 1,200 a 1200 Design Complete, Construction 2014-2016 Lake Park Bridge &Mountain Avenue 4 Bridge Bridge Rehab. 360 188 18A Work Completed 5 Miscellaneous PavementDowntown Pavement Rehab. 574 30 500 Design Underway 2,882 224 2,201 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2019 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #; (951)'943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A'Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 2,701,000.00 718,000.00 V 3,419,000.00 Item No: Project Name l Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($00€ *s) 2014-2015 1 VVarren Road Pavement Rehab, 1,500 1,200 Downtovvn Area Pavement Rehab. 500 500 - City Wide Traffic Control Signage, Traffic Report 163 38 Round About 500 400 .1 San Jacinto Avenue @ 5 Points Improvements Ramona Expressway (Lake Park to 400 275 5 Esplanade) Pavement Rehab. TOTALS 3,063 2,413 RIVERSIDE' COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY''2014 2019 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 2 of 5 Prepared by. Habib Motlagh Phone #:(951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation; Estimated Measure A Available far'FY 2015-2016 Projects: 1,006,000.00 740,000.0V 1,746,000,00 � Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (5000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015.2016 1 Esplanade Avenue (San Jacinto Pavement Rehab. 750 600 Ave. to Hewitt) 2 San Jacinto Avenue City Limit Pavement Rehab. 400 110 3 City Wide Traffic Control Signage, Traffic Report 100 50 4 DeAnza. Drive Widening & / Rehabilitation design - ' , 7' 60- R 100 100 TOTALS 1,350 1360 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 2019 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motl'agh Rhone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016.2017 Measure A Allocation. Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 886,000.00 762,000.0R 1,648,000.00 Zr- Item No. Project Name t Limits Project Type Total east ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Sanderson Avenue City Limits Pavement rehab: 1,000 500 2 Ramona Expressway Marren Road to Sanderson) Pavement Rehab. 450 300 TOTALS 1,460 800 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION lVIEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM' FY 2014 - 2019 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #. (951) 943-6504 Date: May 6, 2014. Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 20017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects 848,000.00 785,000.00 r/ 1,633,000.00 item - No, P'raject Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000"s) 2017-2018 1 downtown Area Pavement Rehab. 1,500 1,200 Traffic Reports and 150 150 2 City Wide Traffic Repons Signage TOTALS1',650 1,350 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL. FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2019 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951 ) 9434604 Date: May 6, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for Fit 2018-2019 Projects: 283,000.00 809,000.00 1,092,000.00 ✓ Item No. Project Name f Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 State Street City Limits Pavement Rehab 1,200 700 2 City Wide Pavement Rehab. 500 300 TOTALS 1,700 1,000 inni IMRE = Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF TEMECULA FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 jDepartment of Public Works 41000 Main Street ■ Temecula, CA 92590 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 ■ Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Phone (951) 694-6411 ■ Fax (951) 694-6475 ■ www.cityoftemecula.org May 7, 2014 City of Temecula Grace Alvarez, Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080'Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92502-2208 Re: FY2015-2019 Measure 'A' Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Alvarez; Attached is the City of Temecula's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Measure 'A' funds, including our Project Status Report. The City's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement is also enclosed for your review and approval. All of the projects submitted are included in the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program, scheduled for approval by City Council at their regular meeting of June 10, 2014. If any changes are incorporated subsequent to this session, a revised five-year plan will be submitted to you. If you require any additional information, please contact me at (951) 506-5163. Tom Garcia Director of Public Works/City Engineer Enclosures cc: Jennifer Hennessy - Director of Finance Rudy Graciano — Revenue Manager R:\CIP DIVISION\STAFF\JulieD\PUBWKS\MeasureA FY2015-19coverltr.jc.doc ® Printed on Recycled Paper RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Temecula Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Acting Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: 5,187 2,744 7,931 / Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 5,265 3,432 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Fanilitias 2,502 2,502 3 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Winchester Road Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,530 884 TOTALS 9,297 6,818 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Temecula Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Acting Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: 1,113 2,826 3,939 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2015-2016 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 4,800 1,290 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,462 1,462 TOTALS 6,262 2,752 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Temecula Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Acting Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 1,187 2,911 i 4,098 / Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 3,739 0 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Fanilitipa 1,462 1,462 TOTALS 5,201 1,462 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Temecula Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Acting Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 2,636 2,998 5,634 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 4,800 1,397 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage FarilitiP¢ 1,462 1,462 TOTALS 6,262 2,859 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Temecula Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Acting Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 12, 2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 2,775 3,088 5,863' ''" Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 4,800 1,453 _ 1,462 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Farilitieg _ 1,462 TOTALS 6,262 2,915 FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Temecula (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,431,799, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: Mav 7, 2014 Aaror€ Adams, City Manager ATTEST: Gwyn R. ores, 'CMC, Acting City Clerk 'SAMPLE PROD! - ST 'VS REPORT FORMAT" RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Temecula Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Julie Dauer, Acting Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 12, 2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 8,331 1,907 Annual pavement rehabilitation program On -going annual pavement rehabilitation 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,462 1,015 Annual right -of- way maintenance On -going annual ROW maintenance TOTALS 9,793 / 2,922 =II MEN Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF WILDOMAR FIVE YEAR CIP 2015-2019 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 13/14 i May 28, 2014 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: City of Wildomar's Measure A Expenditure Plan Dear Ms. Trevino: k� f\ 7 c© MAY 2014 RIVERSIDECOUN11' TRANSFufiipaIQN COmmIstioN Please find enclosed the Measure A Expenditure Plan for the City of Wildomar. This Expenditure Plan was approved by Wildomar City Council at the February 12, 2014 meeting. Please note the 2012/13 allocation was carried over for programming in 2013/14. The City restated a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and this adjustment was approved at the March 12, 2014 Riverside County Transportation Commission meeting. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email mbennett(a)cityofwildomar.org or directly at (951) 297-3396. Sincerely, att Bennett, P.E. Deputy City Engineer FY 2014/15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Wildomar (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $0, approved by the Commission at its March 12, 2014 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: S 12q , 2014 MAG ATTEST: 7-Y713 RETARY i MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLAN Fiscal Year 2014/15 — 2018/19 CITY OF WILDOMAR LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM Prepared May 28, 2014 (City Council approved by Res. No. 2014-05 Feb. 12, 2014) Agency: City of Wildomar Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2014-2015 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2014-2015 Projects: $492,893 $555,000 $1,047,893 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements $20,000 $20,000 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $160,000 $160,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 5 George Avenue Sidewalk Sidewalk improvement $139,430 $44,500 6 Bundy Canyon Road Safety Improvements Dirt shoulder improvements and signage $252,200 $23,400 7 Grand Ave. & Clinton Keith Rd. Bike Paths Class II and III Bike Paths $949,500 $311,100 8 Grand Ave. Bike Paths - Corydon to BMS Class II Bike Paths $1,019,100 $140,700 9 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: $127,000 $127,000 repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; storm damage/ flood control projects; widening streets 10 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $44,400 $44,400 TOTALS $2,786,630 $946,100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2015-2016 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2015-2016 Projects: $101, 793 $572,000 _ $673,793 - Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $20,000 $20,000 ADA improvements 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $120,000 $120,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 5 Grand Ave. Bike Paths - Corydon to BMS Class II Bike Paths $1,019,100 $131,760 6 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; storm damage/ flood control projects; widening streets $127,000 $127,000 7 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $45,760 $45,760 TOTALS $1,406,860 $519,520 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $154,273 $589,000 • $743,273 , Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $20,000 $20,000 ADA improvements 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $255,075 $255,075 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 5 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; $127,000 $127,000 6 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $47,120 $47,120 TOTALS $524,195 $524,195 r�� RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 219,078 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 625,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 844,078 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $20,000 $20,000 ADA improvements 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $300,000 $300,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 5 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; storm damage/ flood control projects; widening streets $127,000 $127,000 6 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $50,000 $50,000 TOTALS $572,000 $572,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2019 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/5/2014 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 272,078 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 607,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 879,078.= Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $20,000 $20,000 ADA improvements 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 Remove, repair, crack $283,080 $283,080 3 Pavement Maintenance Program fill, slurry seal as needed 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 I, Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; $127,000 $127,000 ti Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $48,560 $48,560 TOTALS $553,640 $553,640 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/5/2014 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian $20,000 $20,000 - Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related $40,000 $40,000 Fall 2014 Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 3 Pavement Maintenance Program (formerly Slurry Seal & Overlay Program) Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as $550,000 $550,000 - Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 3A Clinton Keith Road Overlay/ Slurry Seal Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal $154,020 $17,670 Fall 2014 Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 4 Pavement Repair Program (Replaced Roadway Imp. to Unpaved Rds. Repair or reconstruct roadways $66,000 $66,000 Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 5 George Avenue Sidewalk Sidewalk improvement $139,430 $25,215 Fall 2014 PS&E 6 Almond Street Sidewalk Sidewalk improvement $243,700 $85,300 Winter 2015 PE 7 Bundy Canyon Road Safety Improvements Dirt shoulder improvements and signage $252,200 $1,900 Fall 2014 PE 8 Grand Ave. & Clinton Keith Rd. Bike Paths Class II and II Bike Patl $949,500 $24,600 Spring 2015 Environmental 9 Clinton Keith/Hidden Springs Traffic Signal modification $110,000 $11,000 Fall 2014 PS&E Signal Modification Project 10 Master Plan of Drainage Update Update MDP $100,000 $100,000 - Research 11 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; $127,000 $127,000 - Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 12 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $41,680 $41,680 (8% of Measure A revenue) TOTALS 2,773,530 1,090,365 Project and Programs (4-10) in italics have been implented in FY 2013/ 14 and were not part of the FY 13/14 Measure A CIP approved at the September 11, 2013 Commission meeting. These projects and program were adopted by Wildomar's City Council on Feb 12, 2014 as part of the Five -Year CIP • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Policy Revision to the Productivity Improvement Program BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the change in the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) to eliminate Commission reporting of the existing mandatory and discretionary PIP targets; 2) Require operators to continue to report performance to the Commission individually via the Commission's Transtrak online software; and 3) Approve the implementation of the annual State of Transit Report in order to report on countywide transit performance. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Transportation funding in the state is governed by the Transportation Development Act (TDA). TDA regulations, in order for the Commission to annually approve funding, require the Commission to have a formal process in place wherein transit operator productivity and performance is reviewed. Beyond requiring a formal review process, the TDA regulations are rather vague on the exact nature of this report other than requiring a mandatory farebox recovery target, as well as a cost efficiency at a cost per revenue hour target. Previous Commission policy defined PIP as a two-step process wherein the Commission set additional PIP targets for the operators over and above TDA required farebox recovery and cost per revenue hour targets. All targets are self -reported by the operators via the Commission's on line performance reporting software, Transtrak. The second step is Commission review and is typically included as part of the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) approval process concurrent with the Commission's budget approval process. DISCUSSION: The original goal of PIP was to encourage improved cost efficiency by the public operators. Typically and consistent with policy, staff allowed the operators to self -report and implement whatever measures they deemed appropriate in order to maintain operational consistency Agenda Item 9D 168 within the target ranges. Years of reporting combined with experience .in reporting over different macroeconomic conditions such as the 2008 recession have, however, uncovered several inconsistencies with the current adopted policy, resulting in a staff review of the adopted targets. Staff then convened the two consolidated transportation service agency (CTSA) operators; Riverside Transit Agency and SunLine Transit Agency, to join in a review of PIP and to discuss potential policy recommendations. The joint review determined several factors are at play that impact how transit performance is being reported. To begin, the existing PIP is individual operator focused, which does not lead to good analysis countywide. Secondly, the timing of the current PIP process requires the transit operators input three quarters of actual but unaudited information and then estimate their fourth quarter performance. This creates a knowledge gap as quarter to quarter efficiency can change and the final numbers as verified by the audit process can differ significantly from performance originally reported. Finally, through intensive analysis of the current targets, it was found some of the targets might be vulnerable to manipulation. Given these issues along with the reliance by Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century funding on performance- and outcome -based reporting, staff believed ,a revision, while necessary to cure the above stated issues, should also be made in such a way that would discuss outcomes in order to answer the "what did we get for our money" question. Annual State of Transit Report While a transit reporting program is required by TDA, typically PIP reporting was buried within the Commission's SRTP process and did not receive much discussion or critical review. The existing PIP targets are also quite technical and, by themselves, do not readily address the question of countywide performance. Staff proposed reporting should instead take place in an environment wherein rolled up performance numbers countywide are used rather than a simplistic reporting of the individual technical targets as reported by operators. It was further proposed the new reporting structure be a neutral report relying primarily on the one remaining applicable TDA mandatory metric — farebox recovery ratio while leveraging new, yet -to -be determined outcome -based metrics. Finally, the report also had to be scalable in that it needed to allow for other modes such as rail and specialized transit, which are not currently covered by the PIP. The question then became one of developing clear goals and objectives for crafting a new report. The goals and objectives generated from this discussion are as follows: 1. The report would be a stand-alone review of transit service measured via annual audited amounts and should be presented concurrent with Commission budget development cycles. Agenda Item 9D • 169 • 2. The report would utilize farebox recovery as the only mandated metric. This would allow for consistency with TDA regulation, as well as provide a standardized metric for all operators. Cost efficiency was not to be included since Commission policy generally prohibits the use of STA funds for operating purposes, instead setting these funds aside for capital investment. 3. The report would derive new metrics that would allow for a macro discussion of transit performance countywide, which could be framed in clear and concise language and allow for a strategic discussion of transit investment at the Commission level. 4. The chosen metrics had to be repeatable and deliver consistent results, which would provide a baseline year and a recurring "snapshot in time" over many years. 5. The report should be expandable to other modes such as rideshare, bicycles, 511, vanpools, and other potential modes derived from meeting SB 375 goals. 6. The report would require operators to continue to utilize Transtrak for the reporting of operator specific performance information so that staff would have a reliable and consistent pool of data to examine on an as -needed basis. Five Performance Indicators In order to meet the stated goals and objectives for a new reporting system, new outcome based metrics would need to be developed. The challenge was to utilize metrics that had wide industry backing, utilize data that was produced by the operators without adding significant workload and could be consistently replicated, and, lastly, to summarize the metrics and data for use in a countywide discussion. After much research and analysis, staff settled on the five indicators as outlined below: Policy and Compliance This first measure is based upon existing California law. All transit providers must achieve established minimum contributions to operational costs from the riders' fares, or farebox revenues. Section 6633.2 of Part 21 of the California Code of Regulations requires public transit programs receiving Local Transportation Funds (LTF) collect fare contributions to operating costs from their ridership. Expressed as the farebox recovery ratio, this indicator reflects the proportion that passenger fares represent of overall operating expenses. It also has the effect of describing subsidy needed in order to fully fund operations. Trips Per Capita This second measure, trips per capita, points to the utilization of the public transportation network in Riverside County. Trips per capita reflects total trips provided in relation to the overall county population, measuring use of public transit by the total population to determine Agenda Item 9D 170 a per capita rate of annual trips taken per County resident. Land use decisions by the county and cities, transit availability, convenience, cost per ride, and reliability all contribute to the public's use of transit routes and transportation programs, combining to impact utilization. Accessibility and Coverage Riverside County's public transit operators primarily serve a wide array of low -density urban, suburban, and rural communities. The challenge of serving such dispersed population centers over large expanses of space is reflected in the effort required by the operators to provide adequate levels of coverage. The coverage metric presented here assesses the proportion of the population who lives within three-quarters of a mile of transit fixed route service excluding dial -a -ride service. While this three-quarters of a mile metric is greater than the typical one -quarter mile walkable distance typically utilized by transit planners, it does suggest transit's sphere of influence as the three-quarters mile envelope mirrors the Americans with Disabilities Act requirement for the provision of complementary paratransitto persons with disabilities. The indicator identifies total population living within three-quarters mile of local fixed route or of a Commuter Link bus stop as a percentage of total service area population. It should be noted that additional transit service may exist past the three-quarters mile metric and that continuing effort is being made in order to properly quantify and measure this service, its costs, and its performance. Connectivity Transfers between transit routes, modes, systems, and corridors all contribute to the robustness of a transit network. Such connections help riders make regional trips and travel beyond their immediate neighborhood. Improved connections — whether by physical transfer or common fare media or coordinated schedules — together support improved mobility for riders. More connections may make a trip possible. Good connections can speed that trip, as do other innovations such as speeding the process of paying fares. Frequency, span, and time between connections can all have an effect on connectivity. Working to improve connectivity by considering these factors in both transit planning and performance reporting is an ongoing effort by the operators and will be reported as such in future State of Public Transit Reports. Resources Combined resources represent the final piece of this picture of Riverside County's public transportation program. Resources establish a baseline for key transit indicators within the county including: Agenda Item 9D 171 • • 1. Available state and local funding that supports transit service and can match or leverage available federal funding; 2. The number of public transit vehicles by which these programs provide trips; and 3. The number of revenue vehicle miles driven that reflect the quantities of service provided across the county. These indicators give a sense of the physical space that Riverside County transit operators must cover with the funding provided. They provide some indication of how much transit service is provided in relation to the size of the service area, over the course of the year, and within these three regions. While numbers of vehicles can change due to service requirements, this metric simply attempts to establish a picture of funding and investment for transit service countywide. Next Steps Staff is recommending the Commission adopt the revised policy wherein the reporting and review of the existing mandatory and discretionary PIP targets is eliminated and instead replaced with staff delivering this annual Countywide Performance Report. Staff also recommends that the Commission continue to require the operators to report individual performance through the Commission's established online reporting system, Transtrak. Based upon Commission approval, staff will continue to work with the operators to deliver an annual report for subsequent years. A June 2014 baseline report of countywide performance for FY 2012/13 is included as an attachment. There is no direct fiscal impact related to adoption of the revised PIP policy. Attachment: Riverside County Public Transportation Annual Countywide Performance Report, FY 2012/13 Agenda Item 9D 172 • • • Riverside County Public Transportation - Annual Countywide Performance Report, FY 2.012/13 -1•wr i 11N44441; Robert Yates Multimodal Services Director Riverside County Transportation Commission June 2014 Prepared by: rAMM A rukANs i Pi...Arad,11ri� 173 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT This page left intentionally blank. Page ii • 174 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Riverside County Tronspor elion Commission RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL TRANSIT .PERFORMANCE REPORT, FY 2012/13 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 REPORTING PROGRAM PURPOSES 2 FIVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2 1. Policy and Compliance 2 2. Utilization 4 3. Accessibility and Coverage 6 4. Connectivity. 13 5. Resources 14 CONCLUSION — Establishing Riverside County's Baseline 15 APPENDICES 17 APPENDIX A-1— Definitions, Data Sets, and References 19 APPENDIX A-2 — Resource Documents Contributing to This Report 20 APPENDIX B — Public Transportation Trips Provided, All Modes 21 APPENDIX C — Bus Stop Location Counts By Operator 22 APPENDIX D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Three Years 25 Page 1 iii 175 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUALCOUNTYWIDEPERFORMANCEREPORT List of Figures Figure 1. Riverside Transit Agency — 74% Population Coverage 8 Figure 2. SunLine Transit Agency —81% Population Coverage 9 Figure 3. Corona Cruiser —73% Population Coverage 10 Figure 4. Pass Transit — 84% Population Coverage 11 Figure 5. Palo Verde Valley Transit — 72% Population Coverage 12 List of Tables Table 1. Countywide Transportation Development Act (TDA) Audited Farebox Recovery, FY 12/13 — 25.5% 3 Table 2. Public Transit Trips per Capita, FY 12/13 — 8.1 4 Table 3. Transit Trips Per Capita for Other Areas, Bus Boardings Only 5 Table 4. Bus and Rail Transfer Location Counts for Riverside County 13 Table 5. Public Transportation Resources in Riverside County — FY 12/13 14 Table 6. Riverside County Public Transportation Summary of FY 12/13 Countywide Performance 15 Page I iv • • 176 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Riverside County Transportation Commission RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT, FY 2012/13 INTRODUCTION This document introduces a new public transportation performance reporting program for Riverside County. It seeks to consider the countywide implications of its public transit programs, reporting at a countywide level on public transit's accomplishments on behalf of county residents. Historically, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and its public transit providers used the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) to report on system accomplishments and to measure performance of individual transit operators. This task is required for continued countywide compliance with State of California Transportation Development Act (TDA) requirements. The Riverside County Public Transportation - Annual Countywide Performance Report presents a new structure for describing mobility impacts across Riverside County, serves to establish a baseline year against which future impacts can be assessed, and maintains compliance with TDA. RCTC's Annual Countywide Performance Report was developed over more than a year in consultation with the county's public transportation providers. It is framed by the performance measurement focus of federal transportation authorizing legislation, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) and by the statutorily required performance standards set by TDA. This Annual Countywide Performance Report also draws upon transit research conducted by the Transit Cooperative Research Program of the National Academy of Sciences. This Annual Countywide Performance Report will contribute to conversations between the Commission and its many stakeholders about transit services within the county by tracking public transit experience in five key areas. Over time, additional transit performance indicators may be added, deleted, modified and possibly replaced. Attention to countywide performance, through measures considered important during each annual cycle, will examine progress in these initial five areas and suggest where further effort, resources, and focusmay be required. Page I 1 177 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT REPORTING PROGRAM PURPOSES Commission purposes of this Annual Countywide Performance Report include: 1. To present a countywide view of transit performance, establishing a neutral reporting program of Riverside County's public transportation services. 2. To provide a reporting resource to support Commission -level transportation planning and programming decisions that can help identify transit issues related to land -use decisions on a city and countywide level. 3. To provide a snapshot in time, a benchmark set of measures from which to view public transportation and assess countywide trends. 4. To use performance reporting methodology that is outcome -based and meets Federal MAP- 21 and State of California Transportation Development Act statutory requirements. 5. To establish a framework that is expandable to other modes and to other measures, potentially including vanpool, rideshare, 5-1-1, and bicycles, as well as adaptable for documenting Riverside County's SB 375 goals for reducing passenger vehicle emissions. Appendix A includes key definitions and identifies resource documents used to help build this report. FIVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The indicators selected present a comprehensive picture of Riverside County public transportation services and programs, creating a point -in -time picture on various dimensions. A discussion of each indicator follows to then report its current assessment for Riverside County. Some indicators are presented in relation to individual providers. Others reflect the experience of three Riverside County geographic regions: Western Riverside, the Coachella Valley and the Palo Verde Valley. 1. Policy and Compliance This first measure is based upon existing California law. All transit providers must achieve established minimum contributions to operating costs from their rider's fares, called farebox. The State of California, Transportation Development ActSection 6633.2 statutorily requires that in order to protect continued funding, public transit programs receiving Local Transportation Funds (LTF) must collect passenger fares to contribute to overall operating costs at minimum proportion of fares to total expense. This is expressed as the farebox recovery ratio. The farebox recovery ratio is the proportion that passenger fares contribute to the transit program's overall operating expense. The farebox standards for these state -mandated minimums are: • 20% for urban transit providers; and • 10% for rural or demand response only providers. Page l 2 178 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT In Riverside County, because each of the large transit providers operate in both urban and rural areas, Caltrans allows a "blended" minimum fare revenue standard through a formula approved by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Blended ratios combine the modes of fixed route and demand response fare recovery rates for both urban and non -urbanized areas. These blended minimum standards recognize the large expanses that Riverside County's public transportation programs must serve. Farebox recovery ratios reflect the interaction of several factors: • Farebox levels are influenced positively by ridership as more riders will generate increased fare revenue and therefore achieve a higher fare contribution to operating costs. • Farebox recovery reflects critical agency policy in that transit fares are a key policy area and are determined locally. • Farebox recovery is influenced by attention to operating costs, as systems operating efficiently will have lower expenses and fares will represent a comparatively higher proportion of total costs —a higher farebox recovery ratio. Farebox recovery is one tool by which to assess a transit program's strength, as it reflects this interaction of operator fare policy, efficiency in handling expenses and riders' utilization of the service. A healthy transportation network — with higher farebox recovery ratios — is finding the right balance between rider contribution to cost, public subsidy of operating expense and optimal operating efficiency. In Riverside County for FY 2012/13, the overall county farebox recovery ratio was 25.5%. Table 1 shows the individual minimum standards fare revenue that each operator must achieve to stay in compliance with California law and the system and countywide levels actually achieved this past year, as well as the audited, actual fare revenue ratios achieved. All Riverside County public transit providers were at or above their system's minimum fare revenue requirement for FY 2012/13. Table 1. Countywide Transportation Development Act (TDA) Audited Farebox Recovery, FY 12/13 — 25.5% T r L . 11 L. rr h Sauce: Annual Financial Statements with Independent Auditor's Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2013 - All Operators' Final Transit Services Fund Page 13 179 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT 2. Utilization The second measure, trips per capita, points to the utilization of the public transportation network in Riverside County. Trips per capita reflect total trips provided in relation to the overall county population. It measures use of public transit by the total population to determine a per capita rate of annual trips taken per county resident. Land use decisions made by the county and the cities can influence transit availability, convenience, cost, and even reliability. These all combine to impact the public's use of transit routes, transportation programs, and its utilization. Riverside County is experiencing high levels,of population growth; its 41.7% increase from years 2000 to 2010 was reported by the US Census as the highest county growth rate in the State of California. In an environment of such significant population growth, public transportation must work steadily to increase ridership for its trips per capita indicator to simply stay constant. Monitoring trips per capita over time suggests how well the network connects people and available transit services, even as more people have increased places to which they need or wish to travel. Table 2 presents the trips per capita calculation that is inclusive of all public transportation programs within Riverside County in relation to its 2.25 million residents (2013). Appendix B presents the system -level detail from which these numbers are compiled. A measure of 8.1 transit trips per capita is calculated for this most recent 2012/13 year. Monitoring this important indicator over time provides insight into how effectively the transit network is keeping pace with a growing and geographically spreading population. Table 2. Public Transit Trips Per Capita, FY 12/13 — 8.1 Public Transportatiori Trips Provided FY 12/13 Service by Mode ?�I u westem Riverside County Coachella Pete -Verde Valley Valley 5p ^.r ountyiride Trips. Notes: [1] Annual Boardings for 3 Riverside Metrolink lines: Riverside, 91 and Inland Empire -Orange County Lines. [2] Public Bus, Fixed Route trip counts do not include Specialized Transportation funded fixed route trips. Extracted from TransTrack 3/1/14. [3] Ridership and vehicle data for Public Transit Operators extracted from TransTrack Table 2 on 3/1/14. [4] State of California, Dept. of Finance, E-1, May 12, 2013 - http://vwrw.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/projections/interim/view.php. Page 14 180 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Trips per capita is a standard industry measure for reporting the volumes of public transit trips taken in relation to a region's population. For Riverside County as a whole, and considering all public transit modes of rail, fixed route, demand responsive, and specialized transportation, a trips per capita rate of 8.1 was achieved during FY 2013. The 18.2 million public transit trips presented in Table 2 include annual boardings for the three Metrolink lines that originate in Riverside (the Riverside Line, the 91 Line and the Inland Empire - Orange County Line) and 17% of all trips reported. Just over eight in ten trips reported in Table 2 were provided by the public transit operators; including almost 14 million (76%) fixed route trips and 796,000 (4%) demand responsive trips. RCTC's specialized transportation program provided almost 560,000 trips, just 3% of total trips but close to the proportion of all the public paratransit trips provided. To provide a context for this indicator in Riverside County, Table 3 compares per capita transit use with several other regions. Drawing from the National Transit Database (NTD) annually reported ridership, Table 3 figures report only bus boardings for fixed -schedule service and three providers reporting into the NTD. Table 3 does not include demand responsive, specialized transportation trips, nor rail passenger trips as these are not consistently reported in the NTD. Table 3 also presents service area square mileage and population density figures, both of which impact the transit operator's ability to efficiently provide trips. Table 3. Transit Trips Per Capita for Other Areas, Bus Boardings Only 2012 Nattonai Transit Database Motor 13us Only Statistics Unlinked Service Area Passenger Population T ips 160,000 153,8003,902Riverside = Trips Capp Service Area Population per per square Square IVIde Mileage (in persons) Corona Cruiser (fi-r route . Transit Agency (fixed route only) 1,700,356 8,420,300 a 624 Sunline Transit Agency (fixed route only) 423,644 4,436,900 378 > & ; p .P • LA Metro 8,626,817 352,171,500 f` E� ry 5,702 San Diego NITS 1,960,088 52,106,400 2,738 Orange County Transit Authority 3,014,823 52,530 900 � ,�� ,i � 6,497 Sacramento Regional Transit 966,629 13,145,900 4,374 Omnitrans 1,470,000 15,673,800 ��'� ' r�.�x�'� 3,175 North County Transit District (San Diego County) 896,787 7,905,600 ?iQ3r 2,225 Victor Valley Transit Authority 334,988 1,767,200 �Dt . ,3 . nr a ` 790 Valley Metro (Phoenix, AZ.) 3,629,114 9,023,800 _ 4,958 Source: National Transit Database (http://www.ntdprogram.goy/ntdprogram/profiles.htm) NTD Transit Profiles/Transit Agency Search/2012 Although Table 3 shows other regions achieving higher trips per capita rates — such as Los Angeles, North San Diego, Orange, and Sacramento Counties — none approach the expansive service area size of RTA's over 2,700 square miles that includes rural communities and extensive low -density suburban development, as well as urban Riverside. In the case of SunLine, at a 10.5 trips per capita level in relation to service area size and population density, this reflects the utilization of a small system that is covering a large area. Page 15 181 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Again, it is reiterated that Table 3 presents only fixed route (the NTD category called motor bus) and does not include demand responsive, specialized transit nor rail trips. These additional modes were incorporated into the countywide trips per capita measure, previously presented in Table 2 and collectively achieving an 8.1 trips per capita rate for FY 2012/13. 3. Accessibility and Coverage Riverside County's public transit operators serve a wide array of low -density urban, suburban and rural communities. The challenge of serving such dispersed population centers — over large expanses of space — is reflected in the effort required to provide adequate levels of coverage. The coverage metric presented here is percentage of residents within 3/ mile of public fixed route transit. This r assesses the proportion of the population who live within % of a mile of transit fixed route service excluding dial a ride. This 3/ of a mile metric is greater than the typical % mile walkable distance commonly used by transit planners. It does however suggest transit's sphere of influence as the 3/ mile envelope mirrors the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement for the provision of complementary paratransit to persons with disabilities. The indicator identifies total population living within 3/ mile of local fixed route or of a commuter service bus stop as a percentage of total service area population. It should be noted that additional transit service, specifically paratransit, may exist past this % mile metric. While continuing effort is being made to spatially quantify and measure paratransit services, costs and performance, both modes are reflected in the farebox and trips per capita metrics. For commuters who live at significant distances from their jobs, making very long trips between home and work can be quite difficult. Transit can ameliorate challenges that a jobs -housing imbalance presents by providing an alternative to driving alone. For local trips, with housing often at distances from city centers or shopping and local jobs, public transit seeks the balance between coverage to serve sprawling, low -density neighborhoods and operating efficiencies necessary to pick up sufficient riders, transport them quickly, and generate adequate farebox revenues. This balancing act is reflected in decisions about where buses travel and how frequently. The accessibility measure reported here of residences within 3/ of a mile of transit routes presents a "30,000 foot level" assessment of public transit's fixed route coverage of its service area in relation to the population residing there. Individual maps follow, Figures 1 through 5, depicting each transit provider's service area. Each map identifies the total population of the provider's service area and the population within 3/ mile of local fixed route or of commuter service bus stops for that provider, presenting only services within Riverside County. l Providers do have routes running into San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, and 1 A description of the methodology for calculating the population within the 3/3 mile of transit services is summarized on each map (Figures 1 through 5) and further detailed in Appendix A: Data Definitions. Page 6 182 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT San Diego Counties as well as PVVTA's service across the Colorado River into Arizona. Out -of -county route segments and population are not included in this service accessibility measure represented in these maps, instead reflecting transit's accessibility only to Riverside County residents. Combining the proportions of service areas represented on the five maps following, Riverside County's public transportation programs are providing fixed route transit within % of a mile of 77% of Riverside County residents. This means that just under eight in ten county residents have potential access to general public, fixed route transportation. Page 17 183 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Figure 1. Riverside Transit Agency - 74% Population Coverage ....Filer ci - , 3ii�ib4 .66 *" � 4.vYu�ir kiiialiiii. ., � Cli i rs'.' -0it�� a arort Page 18 184 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Figure 2. SunLine Transit Agency — 81% Population Coverage Page 1 9 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT • Figure 3. Corona Cruiser — 73% Population Coverage Page 1 10 186 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Figure 4. Pass Transit — 84 % Population Coverage Page 111 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Figure 5. Palo Verde Valley Transit — 72% Population Coverage Palo Verde Valley; Population of Palo Verde Valley Transit Service Area and 314 Mile of PVVTA Bus Routes POPULATION o-S9 IN 264.52& 50 - 135 i *alp 1.017 - ZP4 1M1 1.010 - 2,617 Service Area =24,. 5 00090 3!4 Mlle Eluaer= 17,436 (72%) • �}} Ehreabmr4 • „. an as V -'6rF IY } i54� W 1 = 1 L Pur Cr a je t�ii1lL • --- e pV:VTA Routes • Page 112 188 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT 4. Connectivity Transfers between transit routes, between modes, between systems and corridors all contribute to the robustness of a transit network. Such connections help riders make regional trips and travel beyond their immediate neighborhood. Improved connections, whether by physical transfer or common fare media or coordinated schedules, together support improved mobility for riders. More connections may make a trip possible. Good connections can speed that trip, as can other innovations such as speeding the process of paying fares. The particular connectivity indicator reported here counts the existing physical connections in this large county. These may be transfers between routes within a transit property, within the county as a whole or between counties. The count alone does not reflect the quality of the individual connection, in terms of how well or how poorly services are connected, but it does indicate that a connection exists. Frequency, span and time between connections can all have an effect on connectivity. Working to improve connectivity by considering these factors in both transit planning and performance reporting between Riverside and its neighboring counties will contribute to improved mobility for Riverside County residents. Table 4 presents the distribution of the 2,843 connections enumerated in Appendix C and currently supporting Riverside residents' transit use. Of these, 95% support transfers within individual systems while 2% supports transfers within the county and between other Riverside County public transit systems. Another 3% support connections to neighboring counties and 1% support transfers between rail, such as Metrolink and Amtrak or with the inter -city bus system, such as Greyhound. Table 4. Bus and Rail Transfer Location Counts for Riverside County Public Transpalrtatiorn Transfer Locations Fixed Route and Rail Intra-System Bus' Inter -County "Bus, County W'ithin`Coun Regional:Bus Transit Between Counties: Regional Pail and In ar-City'uus ' TOTAL Western Riverside .,;;Coachella County Valley 12/1.311,; FY 12/13 l?l.. 2,581 42 75 28 2,726 92 0 98 Palo Verde Valley FY 12 13 19 Countywide Totals FY 12/13 2,691 45 75 32 2,843 95% 2% 3% 1% 100% Source: See Appendix B for detail by operator. [1] Reflects RTA and Corona's May 2014 service changes. [2] Reflects SunLine'sJanuary 2014service change. 189 Page 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Some significant new connections were developed during this past year. These include the SunLine and RTA Route 220 connecting the Coachella Valley to Riverside and Metrolink, and the Banning/ Beaumont connection with San Bernardino's Metrolink via the Loma Linda Veterans Administration Medical Center in Loma Linda. Both of these regional services were initiated during FY 2012/13. 5. Resources Combined resources represent the final piece of this picture of Riverside County's public transportation program. The resources presented in Table 5 establish a baseline for key transit - related resources within the County's three geographic regions, including: 1. State and local funding that support service and can match available Federal funding; 2. Public transit vehicles by which these programs provide trips; and 3. Revenue vehicle miles driven that reflect the quantities of public transit's fixed route and paratransit service provided across these large service areas. Table 5 also includes two measures that reflect the service area sizes and quantities of revenue service miles provided. These are first, transit vehicle per square mile and secondly, vehicle revenue miles per square mile. These indicators give a sense of the physical space that Riverside County transit operators must cover. They provide some indication of how much transit service is provided in relation to the size of the service area, over the course of the year and within these three regions. Table 5. Public Transportation Resources in Riverside County: Commission Allocated State and Local Transit Funding, Vehicles and Vehicle Revenue Miles Public Tritnsportatiion Resources FY12/'f 3 Western Riverside County Coachella Palo Verde rCoun Totals Valley Valley State and Local Transit Funding, Excluding all Federai $s Programmed LTF and Measure A Transit, FY 2012/13, Exclusive of state and local rail funding Transit Vehicles (fixed route,& paratransit excluding taxis) RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Vehicle Revenue. Miles (fixed route & parairansit) RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Square Mites r.4" ., Measure . VahlcIPs per Square iyiile Maastii f Vehkle.Revenue Mites Per Squats MO 4S4 5,21 420' 9,422' .Sources: Vehicle and mileage information from FY 2012/13 TransTrack Reports - Table 1 Fleet Inventory and Quarterly Performance Scorecard. Extracted from TransTrack on March 1, 2014. A total of 445 vehicles served Riverside County's public transit programs, providing over 16.1 million revenue miles of service, translating to 3,301 vehicle miles per service area square mile in FY Page 114 190 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012/13. The ratio of 0.09 vehicles per square mile represents almost 1 vehicle per 10 square miles to serve Riverside County's 2.25 million residents. Countywide, the total fleet size has only grown by three vehicles over the past three years (FY 10/11 — FY 12/13), as shown in Appendix D, underscoring the achievement of Riverside County's public transit programs ability to accommodate increasing population and expanding communities within their existing fleet resources. CONCLUSION - ESTABLISHING RIVERSIDE COUNTY'S BASELINE Table 6 presents a summary and static picture of the state of public transportation for Riversidetounty for FY 2012/13. These initial five measures catalogue performance impacts and report resources available to Riverside County's rail, fixed route bus, Americans with Disabilities Act complementary paratransit programs, and various specialized transportation services. These measures report on the county's experience with California's statutorily required farebox recovery ratio, and indicators of transit utilization in relation to population, transit accessibility, and coverage performance. Farebox recovery ratio remains a critical indicator, both because it is a standard established Table 6 Riverside County Public Transportation Summary of FY 12/13 Countywide Performance Farebox Recovery Ratio Transit Trips Per Capita 25.5% 8.1 Transit Accessibility & Coverage 77% Countywide Average 3/4 Mile Accessibility to Fixed Route Bus Stop Transfer Connections Intra-System Inter -County Bus, Within County Regional Bus Transit Between Counties Regional Rail and National Inter -City Bus FY 12/13 Transportation Resources State and Local Operating Funds Public Transit Vehicles (Fixed Route & Paratransit) Vehicle Revenue Miles (Fixed Route & Paratransit) Square Miles of Transit Service Area Vehicles Per Square Mile Vehicle Revenue Miles Per Square Mile 2,843 95% 2% 3% 1% $53.9 million 445 16.1 million 4,887 0.09 3,301 in statute and because it reflects the use and utilization of working resources available during this period. Many other measures by which to review the performance of Riverside County's public transit programs exist. The group of indicators and resources presented here establishes this Riverside County Public Transportation Annual Countywide Performance Report as a reliable and comprehensive countywide picture of FY 2012/13 publicly -supported transportation programs. This baseline helps to frame discussion of future initiatives and opportunities, to guide policy makers and transit providers alike as they determine how to use scarce resources in improving the mobility of Riverside County residents. Page 115 191 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT This Page Left Intentionally Blank Page 116 • 192 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT APPENDICES Appendix A-1— Definitions, Data Sources and References Appendix A-2 — Resource Documents Contributing to this Report Appendix B — Public Transportation Trips Provided, All Modes, Four Fiscal Years Appendix C — Bus Stop Location Counts by Operator Appendix D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Three Years Page 117 193 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT This Page Left Intentionally Blank Page 118 194 )' ReTG RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT APPENDIX A-1— Definitions, Data Sets, and References Dahl Element Passenger trips Anticipated Data Sources FY 2012/13 Audit/ State Controllers' report Definition - One-way passenger boardings of fixed route, paratransit, deviated fixed -route; - Metrolink boardings at Riverside County stations. Operating expense FY 2012/13 Audit/ State Controllers' report Definition from March 2008 adopted Commission policy: All operating expense object Classes exclusive of depreciation and amortization, vehicle lease expense. PUC 99247(a) Fare revenue FY 2012/13 Audit/ State Controllers' report Definition from March 2008 adopted Commission policy: Fare revenue plus supplemental fare revenues from local support, which may include interest, advertising, etc. as provided for in PUC 6611.3 Transit route structure Active service operating along a fixed route or deviated fixed route as of June 30tn GIS shape files for active routes County population data at the block level US Census, 2010 - Total county population - Block level data Transit transfer data: intra-system Inter -system Inter -county Transfer locations at which routes connect; each location counted only once; counts validated by operator Count each stop -level transfer location one time for each operator, as of June 30tn Vehicle revenue miles TransTrack data — extracted from Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary on March 1st, 2014 Annual revenue service miles as of June 30tn or total vehicle service miles, inclusive of deadhead. Square mileage US Census County square mileage Operator service area square mileage reported in NTD Whatever is reported to NTD, by operator. Vehicle revenue hours TransTrack data Annual revenue service hours as of June 30tn Accessibility and coverage GIS calculations for Figures 1 thru 5. The methodology used to calculate population within the % mile buffers and service areas is included on each map. Using the local California State Plane Coordinate system with distance units measured in feet, buffer and service area polygons for each set of transit routes were first overlaid on top of the area's 2010 US census blocks. Then, 2010 census population counts for each block intersecting these polygons were applied to the corresponding buffer or service area using an area -ratio calculation. If, for example, only % of the area of a census block fell within the buffer or service area then only % of the population of that census block was applied to it. The sum of all these census block calculations, in turn, comprised the population estimate for the corresponding buffer or service area. Page 119 195 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT APPENDIX A-2 — Resource Documents Contributing to This Report • Transit Cooperative Research Report 88: A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance Measurement System. Kittleson & Associates, Inc., et al. Washington D.C., 2003. • Transit Cooperative Research Report 141: A Methodology for Performance Measurement and Peer Comparison in the Public Transit Institute. Ryus, P; Perk, V.; Coffel, K.; Cherrington, L.; Gan, A. Prepared by Kittleson & Associates, Inc., et al. Washington D.C. Webinar presentation, December 2012. • Performance Measures for Public Transit Mobility Management. Sen, L; Majumdar, S.R; Highsmith; M.; Cherrington, L. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University. Report 0-6633-1. Prepared for: Texas Dept. of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. College Station, Texas. December 2011. Page 120 196 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT APPENDIX B — Public Transportation Trips Provided, All Modes Public Tray on Trips Provided Service by Mode [it Z RCTC Cormuter Rail - Rverside RCTC Ccrrrmrter Rail - Inland Empire Crange County RCTC Commuter Rail - 91 'P RTA FR SunLine FR RTA Contract FR Banning FR Corona FR Beaumont FR Palo Verde Valley FR IUX RTA DAR Fverside Special Transportation Services DAR SunLine DAR Corona DAR Beaumont DAR RTA Tap Banning DAR Palo Verde Valley DAR I Fixed Route: RTA Extended Services RTA CorrmAer Link SunUne Extended Services SunLine Commuter Link 220 Paratransit/ Community Shuttle Services: Boys 8 Girls Club of Southwest County Care-A-Va / HOPE Bus Care Connexxus City of Norco - Senior Shuttle CVAG Roy's Desert Resource Center Friends of Moreno Valley MoVan Inland AIDS Project Operation Safehouse Riverside County Regional Medical Center W ldomar Senior Community Mileage Reimbursement (one-way trips supported[: Court Appointed Special Advocates- CASA TRIP - Partnership to Preserve Independent Liting TRIP - SunUne/Parinership to Preserve Independent Living Bus Passes/ Taxi Vouchers/ Van Pool Trips Beaumont Adult School - Bus pass trips Desert Samaritans - Taxd trips Community Connect/ TAP Bus Pass Trips RCTC Corr cater benefits/ Coachella Van Pool Trips RTA - Travel Training SunLine Toe Voucher Program Mobility Management and Travel Training Projects Care Cormexous - Driver Sensitivity Training Blindness Support - Travel Training Blindness Support - Mobility Management RTA Travel Traini iQn, j2,W5y477 pets d Plan' 2Q9t PIw/ Update RCTe"sh+auaf Report RCTG's Annual Report FY'066 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY 12/13 Notes: [1] Ridership and vehicle data for Public Transit Operators popula ed from TransTrack Table 2 - SRTP Service Summary on 3/1/14. [2) Public bus, Fixed Route trip counts for RTA and SunLine do not include Specialized Transportation funded fixed route trips (RTA Extended, Commuterlink and Travel Training, SunLine Commuter, and Community Connect TAP) (3) State of California, Department of Finance, July 2007, and July 2011 [4] State of California, Dept. of Finance, E-1, May 12, 2013 -- http:/Avww.dof.ca.govhesearch/demographidreports/estimates/e-1/view.php Page 21 197 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT APPENDIX C — Bus Stop Location Counts By Operator RTA Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations as of May 11, 2014 ROUT ] 10 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2] 29 30 31 32 33 35 40 01 42 09 50 51 54 55 fit ]4 ]9 202 204 206 208 210 212 216 21) 18 21 23 3] 1] 11 2 4 1]3 13 29 TOTAt#8"SYEE 0I 29 10 18 10 12 4 0 3 2 9] 11 14 12 10 13 21 12 28 2 l4 14 4 11 4 4 2 3] 16 1] 4 14 11 4 4 4 18 1a 2 2- 4 19 2- 12 10 18 13 0 20 12 11 4 62 21 22 63 22 4 11 11 11 15 2 99 23 2 21 2 24 4 2] 10 12 5 13 5 29 4 Z2 30 )e INTRA-SYSTEM 31 4 23 32 23 9 16 9 4 1 0 2 35 0 41 13 33 12 9 12 10 40 11 10 42 4 12 5 49 19 50 51 2 2 t1 55 4 2 N 61 21 4 11 16 69 ]4 4 13 16 10 10 16 1H 202 19 12 16 5 0 16 6 NOTE: Some routes conned only in one direction, do not necessarily make a meaningful connection on the route's reverse direction. 2 2 204 4 3 4 2 2 2 as 206 208 1 3 2 z 2 2 4 2 1 3 1 1 z 2 1 1 z 1 210 212 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 3 2 1 4 2 2 2 2 5 216 2 2 21] 2 5 3 164 3 12 c 100 37 51 62 29 29 k ' 14 , 69 111 92 16 u 9 >e 66 54 d5 t 33 `2p91 Out -of -county service is possible from RTA routes that connect with Omnitrans and Foothill Transit, Orange County Transportation Authority, North San Diego County Transportation District, and rail services in addition to Metrolink that include Amtrak, San Diego's Coaster and Sprinter. • • Page 122 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION — ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT SunLine Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations as of January, 2014 Routes 14 15 24 30 32 53 '•' 54 70 80 81 90 91 " 95 111 ` 220 14 1 1 2 1 1 15 1 24 1 I 1 30 2 1 2 2 32 1 2 1 1 1 53 1 1 1 INTRA-SYSTEM 54 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 70 1 80 2 2 1 1 1 81 2 2 1 1 1 90 1 1 1 2 1 1 91 1 1 1 2 1 1 95 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 6 7 2 8 7 7 6 17 -. '0,dri TOTALS, BYTYPE OF CONNECT ON ;p !nle ' • Effective date: September 10, 2012 •• Effective date: September 2, 2013 ••• Effective date: January 6, 2014 SunLine's Route #220 to the Metrolink station and downtown Riverside supports out -of -county connections to San Bernardino, Los Angeles and San Diego Counties through the host of transfer options afforded at each of these stops. Corona Cruiser Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations Routes Red Blue TOTALS BY YPE Of CONNEC1TON I NTRA-SYSTEM Red 9 9 Blue lntra-System 9 "v IntertOtiOnt a 4 3 0 • Page 123 199 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT Pass Transit Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations TOTALS $Y ilPEC7F-CONNECTION Routes #1, S, and 6 interact with other routes but have street s ops and no number stops of their own. Route 440 - Free Shuttle service to annual Music Concert at Stewart Park. Pick up and drop offs at various locations in Beaumont. PVVTA Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations Note: Route 5 is a weekend route and is the only route in operation. No other routes are available to transfer to. Quartzsite Transit Services in Arizona connects paratransit services into Blythe/PVVTA Monday -Friday. • s Page 124 • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT APPENDIX D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Three Years Public Transit hicl s 11 Y "* r '- *_' T}• - lett Mown itimmisCounty M1+s ilboIM O oula0 Romphlpt CM014100 Van Clemend Asepowee A vs*, �'Nu1M� • • •:a::Y Source: Vehicle information from FY 12/13 TransTrack Reports -- Table 1 Fleet Inventory. TransTrack Report extracted on March 1st, 2014 1 Page 125 201 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement with Media Beef, Inc. for the Provision of Programming and Website Administration Services for the Commuter Assistance Program BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 14-41-156-00 to Media Beef, Inc. (Media Beef) for programming and website administration services related to the Commuter Assistance Program (CAP) -for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $938,600; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1E511 is the Commission's traveler information system and is operated by the Commission on a 50/50 cost sharing agreement with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). Commission staff is constantly updating both content and the graphical interface of 1E511 as it appears on the website and, earlier this fiscal year, implemented a complete overhaul of the companion interactive voice recognition (IVR) telephone system, the website, and the smart phone application. This allows 1E511 to continue to be an up to date, useful, and relevant source of information. Additionally, on July 1, 2014, IECommuter will become the Commission's newest mobility product by delivering a state of the art ridematching and trip planning service to the constituents of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. This will also be operated on a 50/50 cost sharing agreement with SANBAG. The Commission originally entered into an agreement with Geographics wherein, amongst other duties, Geographics would serve as technical project manager, web administrator, and agent for hosting 1E511 on a cloud environment at Rackspace, Inc. of San Antonio Texas. The Agenda Item 9E 202 Commission also previously entered into an agreement with Base Technologies, Inc. (Base Technologies) wherein Base Technologies would develop and implement a new ridematching software system for the Commission. This new software (Komotor) is to become the foundation for IECommuter. Geographics' 1E511 duties were intended to overlap with IECommuter as the technical support liaison so similar functionality and cross platform compatibility would be achieved. It was also intended that Geographics would continue to provide programming/software design, hosting, and website administration services to the Commission for both IECommuter and 1E511. Subsequent events have resulted in both Geographics and Base Technologies changing their business models and key personnel, which created a void of expertise in regard to technical project management in developing and reviewing new software, hosting software, and website administration for the Commission's CAP. This void is particularly concerning given the nature of the IECommuter (Komotor) software and modern software development consisting of complex databases, responsive web design, and custom development. Lastly, the Commission also entered into an agreement with Inland Transportation Services (ITS) wherein ITS acts in the capacity of program administrator for the Commission's CAP. This duty included management and administration of the Commission's regional rideshare database for Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Orange County, Los Angeles County, and Ventura County. As of July 1, 2014, the Commission will no longer act in this capacity for the region and will instead deploy IECommuter as the new ridematching system for use by Riverside and San Bernardino County constituents. DISCUSSION: The 1E511 web, mobile, and IVR systems have consistently performed strongly and are currently in a live production environment. The new IECommuter ridematching and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) average vehicle ridership (AVR) web application are intended to formally launch on July 1, 2014 as an extension to the existing 1E511 brand. IECommuter will provide ridematching and trip planning services for the constituents of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties throughout Southern California, as well as continue the Commission's traditional outreach to employers in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties with assistance in managing the SCAQMD's Rule 2202 requirements. IECommuter and its underlying software package Komotor (consisting of JBoss, Postgres SQL, and JAVA freeware) as developed by Base Technologies will replace the Commission's existing www.Ridematch.info regional ridematching system, which is currently managed by ITS through the use of proprietary software (Ridepro) under license from Trapeze, Inc. During the development process of IECommuter and subsequent to launch, the Commission was informed that Base Technologies was sold to CA, Inc. and the new parent company intended to discontinue development and support of Komotor. A separation agreement was then negotiated with CA, Inc. wherein the Commission received a deep discount in the Agenda Item 9E 203 • • • development of the new software package along with expanded and unique ownership and use rights to Komotor in exchange for releasing CA, Inc. from the support element of the agreement. While the Commission benefited from the software development side of the separation agreement and can legally sell and distribute Komotor to other public entities, another source for support and administration of the highly complex website and software needed to be found. As a former managing partner of Geographics, Michael Hemry spent the last several years in the role of technical project manager for the Commission and has been the key developer and architect on a multitude of projects for the Commission. Mr. Hemry has now formed his own company, Media Beef, which is located in Riverside and specializes in complex database functionality, website design, and administration. While at Geographies, Mr. Hemry was directly responsible for the creation of the Commission's highly successful 1E511 website and mobile application, the RCTC.org website, numerous Commission construction project websites, as well as overall network security and infrastructure monitoring. He was also responsible for the day-to-day technical liaison between Commission staff and Base Technologies in the development of the Commission's Komotor package. Leveraging Mr. Hemry's experience in working closely with Base Technologies, Media Beef was able to secure software and website administration contracts with three metropolitan planning organizations in the U.S. which utilize the same base Komotor software for their ridematching and trip planning services. Given the highly sophisticated nature of the underlying Komotor software used to power IECommuter along with experience working with other agencies having a similar mission statement as the Commission, the utilization of Media Beef to support IECommuter in the absence of Base Technologies as a sole source for the work is justified. Contractors with knowledge and experience in JBoss and Postgres SQL are very limited, and it is even rarer to find a vendor with experience in the use of the Base Technologies Komotor package. As such and given the existing support agreements in place with other agencies, the qualifications of Media Beef as a sole source to perform Komotor support work are unique. A sole source justification is even more compelling once 1E511 is taken into consideration. Given the migration of smartphone technologies, the invention of applications for them, and the fact that almost 60 percent of 1E511 users are now mobile users, a sole source contract award to Media Beef for continued development and support functions is also warranted due to the principal of Media Beef being the original developer of 1E511 and its sister mobile application during his tenure at Geographics. It should be noted the value of existing agreements with Geographics and ITS will be scaled back to reflect the fact that these consultants will no longer be providing elements of the services that are now intended to be performed by Media Beef. While the sole source Agenda Item 9E 204 agreement recommended herein for approval would increase the number of contracts for the CAP, the overall cost of these services to the Commission decreased by almost $169,000. The breakdown of this decrease is as follows: Consultant ITS Geographics Media Beef FY 2013/14 Budget $ 1,704,800 481,000 0 FY 2014/15 Budget $ 1,585,000 244,000 188,000 Increase (Decrease) $ (119,800) (237,000) 188,000 $ 2,185,800 $ 2,017,000 $ (168,800) It should also be noted with the launch of IECommuter and an overall reconfiguration of duties and services beyond those associated with this report, overall costs for the CAP and the Motorist Assistance Program for the provision of ridematching and commute information have dropped by 21 percent for FY 2014/15. Lastly, Media Beef is a local small business and is in the process of qualifying for state certification as a disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE). When attained, Media Beef as a DBE to the Commission's Commuter Assistance and Motorist Assistance programs would add substantial improvement to the Commission's overall DBE participation rate. Staff recommends the Commission award Agreement No. 14-41-156-00 to Media Beef for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $938,600. As noted above, these services are included in the FY 2014/15 budget. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16+ Amount: $ 188,000 $ 750,600 Source of Funds: Measure A CAP, Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies, and SANBAG Funds Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 263 41 65520 (002126,002127) $581,932 202 45 65520 (452131,452124) $356,668 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \44,.4,44,1 Date: 06/13/14 Attachment: Draft Agreement No. 14-41-156-00 Agenda Item 9E • 205 • • Agreement No. 14-41-156-00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR PROGRAMMING AND WEBSITE ADMINISTRATION SERVICES WITH MEDIA BEEF, INC. 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered in by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAN Commission") and MEDIA BEEF, INC. ("Consult 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant desires to provision of certain professional onsulting s terms and conditions set forth •, Agreeme professional consultant, exper Administration services to public familiar with the plans of ommissio 2.2 consulting services _ day of , 201_, TATION COMMISSION ("the ifornia Corporation. ssume r- +nsibility for the uired by Cssion on the nsultant represe is that it is a Programming and Website e State of California, and is nsultant to render certain ("Project") as set forth herein. .1 Gene pm' Sco f Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to C: , ission all I mate s, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary woecessary fully and adequately provide professional consulting services and adv -t n vari•` issues affecting the decisions of Commission regarding the Project and o _ e grams and matters affecting Commission, hereinafter referred to as "Service ` e Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and inc -porated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first specified above to June 30, 2017, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 17336.00000\8752982.1 206 3.3 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of the Commission, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.4 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, method and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall not be employees of Commission and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control_ Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.5 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of Commission. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence and experience upon written approval of Commission. In the event that Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to provisions of Section 3.16 of this Agreement. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Michael Hemry. 3.7 Commission's Representative. Commission hereby designates Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's representative 'shall have the power to act on behalf of Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction from any person other than Commission's Representative or his or her designee: 17336.00000\8752982.1 2 207 • • • 3.8 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Michael Hemry,or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his or her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.9 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with Commission staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Commission's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.10 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant shall perform the Services under this. Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standard generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from Commission, any Services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. 3.11 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 17336.00000\8752982.1 3 208 3.12 Insurance. 3.12.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in 'a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.12.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant 'shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.12.3 JReservedl 3.12.4Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage; (2) Personal 17336.00000\8752982.1 4 209 • • • Injury/Advertising Injury; (3) Premises/Operations Liability; (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability; (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project; (6) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) Broad Form Property Damage; and (9) Independent Consultants Coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from the Commission's insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. (i) The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any. way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. 0) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and 17336.00000\8752982.1 5 210 agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. (i) the limits set forth hereunder. Defense costs shall be payable in addition to (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any Insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. e (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752962.1 6 211 • • • (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. 3.12.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer ,shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.12.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.12.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.12.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract 17336.00000\8752982.1 7 212 until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 3.13 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.14 Fees and Payment. 3.14.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto.` The total compensation shall not exceed [ INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT ] ($[ INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT ]) without written approval of Commission's Executive Director ("Total Compensation"). Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.14.2 Paymentof Compensation. Consultant shall submit to Commission a monthly statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. Commission shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.14.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Commission. 3.14.4 Extra. Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Commission may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by Commission to be necessary for the 17336.00000\8752982.1 3 213 • • • proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Commission's Executive Director. 3.15 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.16 Termination of Agreement. 3.16.1 Grounds for Termination. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been fully and adequately rendered to Commission through the effective date of the termination, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.16.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Commission may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined below, and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.16.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.17 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: Media Beef, Inc. 6809Indiana Ave. #130 Riverside, CA 92506 17336.00000\8752982.1 9 COMMISSION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 214 Attn: Michael Hemry Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual License for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the 'exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were preparedby design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute 17336.00000\8752982.1 10 215 • • separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental workcreated under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other `than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission in order to allow the Commission to pursue legal remedies designed to limit any confidential information required to be disclosed or to assure the confidential treatment of the information following disclosure. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 17336.00000\8752982.1 11 216 3.18.4Infringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers,' employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.20 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such actions. 3.21 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation, the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be renderedagainst the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse the Commission and its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnity shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. This Section 3.21 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752982.1 12 217 3.22 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be supplemented, amended, or modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.23 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.24 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.25 Commission's Right to Employ Other Consultants. The Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.26 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.27 Prohibited Interests and Conflicts. 3.27.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.27.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Commission, during the term of his or her service with Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.27.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.27.4 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission's written consent, prior to 17336.00000\8752982.1 13 218 accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.28 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall' also comply with all relevant provi- sions of Commission's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related Commission programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. - 3.29 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.30 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certified that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Commission shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailingrates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.31 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. 17336.00000\8752982.1 14 • 219 • If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub -consultant for the employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub -consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant. 3.32 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.33 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, .eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.34 Subpoenas or Court Orders.Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall, cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.35 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, and the obligations related to receipt of subpoenas or court orders, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 17336.00000\8752982.1 15 220 3.36 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.37 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code,and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.38 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.39 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 3.40 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.41 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.42 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.43 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.44 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 17336.00000\8752982.1 [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 16 221 • • • SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR PROGRAMMING AND WEBSITE ADMINISTRATION SERVICES WITH MEDIA BEEF, INC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY MEDIA BEEF, INC. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Marion Ashley Signature Chair Name Title Approved as to Form: Attest: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.00000\8752982.1 17 Its: Secretary 222 17336.00000\8752982.1 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES r INSERT ] A-1 223 • • • 17336.00000\8752982.1 EXHIBIT „B" SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [ INSERT ] B-1 224 17336.00000\8752982.1 EXHIBIT "C" COMPENSATION [ INSERT 1 C-1 225 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 9, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; 2) Adopt the following bill positions: a) SB 1228 (Hueso) — Support if Amended; and b) SB 1390 (Correa) — Support In Concept. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State Update Commission Bills Advance_ in State Legislature AB 1721 (Linder), the Commission's legislation to allow toll agencies to charge a reduced -rate toll on clean air vehicles rather than allowing these vehicles to travel for free, passed unanimously in the Senate Transportation & Housing Committee on June 10. This comes after the bill cleared the Assembly floor on a 72-2 vote. AB 1721 is now on the Senate floor awaiting technical amendments to conform the bill to the recently -passed FY 2014-15 state budget. Following these amendments, the bill will be put to a Senate floor vote. If it passes the floor, the bill will be sent to the Governor for consideration. SB 953 (Roth), the Commission's legislation to obtain parking enforcement authority for its Metrolink stations, was approved by the Assembly Transportation Committee on June 16 on the consent calendar. The bill was amended at the request of San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), which is also interested in obtaining parking enforcement authority for its Santa Fe Depot, downtown transit terminal in San Bernardino, and future station sites on its passenger rail project to Redlands. The Commission gladly accepted SANBAG's request to partner on this bill. Agenda Item 10 226 State Budget Update The state budget contained a few transportation items of interest in addition to the major debate over the expenditure of cap and trade revenues. Highlights include: • $142 million of local street and road funds to cities and counties: this is early repayment of loans to the General Fund from the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) from previous budget crises. These are one-time funds; local governments should plan accordingly; • Final $1.2 billion of Proposition 1B appropriations: this completes the 2006 voter - approved program; • Additional $243 million of appropriation authority from Prop. 1B: captures savings from any projects that come in under budget so that these funds can be reinvested in new projects; • Full funding of state commitments for Amtrak intercity rail service; and • Savings of $21 million due to Ca!trans staffing reductions. Cap and trade dominated the transportation policy discussion in the waning hours of budget negotiations. The final cap and trade expenditure policy is slightly improved from the perspective of regional transportation agencies compared to what Governor Brown initially proposed, though less than what Senate Pro-Tem Darrell Steinberg sought. The Commission's adopted principles on cap and trade expenditures focused on two primary issues; maximizing funding for sustainable communities projects (contained in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments pursuant to SB 375), and control over project selection for funding. The primary message from regional advocates was: align funding with the mandate of SB 375 for regions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Advocates for public transit and intercity rail also lobbied heavily for specific funding streams, which the Commission supported. Ultimately, a compromise adopted placing nearly all project selection authority with the state, rather than regions, and slightly increasing the amount of funding available for sustainable communities projects for the life of the cap and trade regime. Transit and intercity rail were given sizeable percentages of funding. The Strategic Growth Council (SGC), a collection of cabinet secretaries to the Governor, are placed in charge of developing the funding programs for sustainable communities; the Commission will need to work closely with SCAG and transit agencies to work with SGC on the development of program guidelines and funding strategies for Riverside County priorities. A thorough analysis of the cap and trade results from this year's budget is elaborated in the attached memo from the California Association of Councils of Governments (CALCOG), of which the Commission is a member. Agenda Item 10 227 • S81228 (Hueso): Trade Corridor Improvement Fund Staff Recommendation: Support if Amended This bill resurrects the Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF) from the Proposition 1B transportation bond approved by California voters in 2006. TCIF provided $2 billion to goods movement projects across the state. The Commission received $150 million for grade separations and the Interstate 215/Van Buren Boulevard interchange. TCIF also funded the Colton Crossing railroad grade separation in San Bernardino County, which resulted in a number of negotiated benefits for the Commission. The $2 billion was divided up around the state by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) through a consensus -based process, whereby the state was separated into four goods movement corridors: LA -Inland Empire, Central Valley, San Diego -Border, and Northern California. Each corridor was given a target amount of funding for their projects, based on a number of factors. The LA -Inland Empire corridor received a more than 70 percent of the funds due to the extraordinary proportion of goods that travel through this part of the state. The Commission was required to work in collaboration with neighboring counties and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, and the Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority to develop a set of projects that was agreeable. The state did not have the primary role in selecting TCIF projects — discretion was given to the regions to select the projects that best met the criteria of TCIF, enjoyed local support, and could meet strict deadlines. SB 1228 seeks to revive the TCIF program in preparation for any future funding source for goods movement projects. Presently, the bill does not, contain any funding on its own. The federal reauthorization of MAP-21 or the state's cap -and -trade program could potentially direct funds to goods movement projects. Given the success of the TCIF model since 2006, staff believes it is a good idea to design future freight funding based on this consensus -based process. The Commission recommends the bill be amended from its present form, which copies the language of Proposition 1B, and add language that perpetuates the program implementation design by the CTC, including but not limited to: • Definition of the state's corridors; • Relative shares of funding for each corridor; • Consensus -based process for project selection within each corridor region; and • Reliance on already -approved CTC guidelines. Adding this detail to the bill is in the spirit of the bill as it is currently written, further solidifying a successful process into law. Doing so will ensure California is prepared to implement goods movement projects as soon as funding becomes available. This will also memorialize the LA - Inland Empire corridor's statewide significance. Agenda Item 10 228 SB 1390 (Correa): Santa Ana River Conservancy Program Staff Recommendation: Support in Concept This bill would create a new conservancy program within the State Coastal Conservancy for the purpose of acquiring lands within a half -mile of the Santa Ana River riverbed in order to preserve open space, provide recreational opportunities, and enhance the overall condition of the Santa Ana River. Supporters of the bill intend for the conservancy program to be a vehicle to accept funding from grants and other sources of revenue to protect, promote, and restore the Santa Ana River for the benefit of the residents of the Inland Empire and Orange County. Several conservancy programs exist throughout the state, including the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. No state funding is provided by SB 1390. Similar legislation was undertaken in 2003 by then -Assemblyman Lou Correa. At that time, the Commission adopted an Oppose Unless Amended position on the bill over concerns that the conservancy would have powers that could potentially impede the planning or implementation of transportation projects in Measure A and the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) that cross or run near the Santa Ana River. The Commission and other transportation agencies sought amendments to the bill that would ensure the conservancy would remain in compliance with the RTP. However, that bill did not become law. Now in 2014 with the proposal returning, staff evaluated the new bill and expressed similar concerns as in 2003. Working collaboratively with Senator Correa's office, Assemblyman Eric Linder's office, Santa Ana River advocates, transportation agencies in Orange and San Bernardino Counties, amendment language has been adopted that clarifies the conservancy cannot take any action that adversely impacts or impedes the planning or implementation of a transportation project in the RTP. This successful effort leaves the bill in a sufficient condition to allay staff and legal counsel concerns. Furthermore, the Commission has recently invested in the Santa Ana River Trail (SART) through its 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects. The three -county trail system is in its final stages of construction and has enjoyed widespread collaboration across several cities in Riverside County (County), and the County itself. An increased emphasis on active transportation by state and federal transportation policymakers increases the importance of ensuring regional projects such as SART have a viable mechanism to collect funds and invest in projects that enhance Riverside County's multimodal network. Recognizing the proposed conservancy could play an important role in enhancing the SART, there is a potential benefit of the conservancy to the county's overall transportation system. Staff also believes creation of a legally recognized entity to purchase land in the Santa Ana River watershed could streamline the process for mitigation land -banking. Recently, staff experienced difficulty in obtaining approvals by federal agencies to bank land to mitigate construction projects due to a lack of officially -recognized entities through which the land could be secured. Agenda Item 10 229 • The bill's language is specific in limiting the new conservancy program's authority. SB 1390 expressly states that the conservancy does not have land use authority and it must comply with locally -adopted general plans and land use regulations. Additionally, the conservancy cannot levy taxes or use eminent domain. No regulatory authority is bestowed upon the conservancy. The conservancy is required to give 30-day notice to the cities and counties where the conservancy plans to purchase land or implement a project. A Santa Ana River Parkway and Open Space Plan must be developed to guide the organization's activities and identify needs. Finally, an advisory board of local stakeholders must be established. Given the restrictions mentioned above, plus the new amendment protecting transportation projects, staff is recommending a Support In Concept position on SB 1390. The Commission will want to remain engaged in the conservancy's activities (assuming the bill becomes law) to ensure it does not grow beyond the intent prescribed in statute and remains consistent with the worthy intent expressed by the bill's sponsors. Federal Update MAP-21 Reauthorization Passes First Committee, Includes the Commission's Proposal Senator Barbara Boxer successfully led a bi-partisan effort to move the highway portion of MAP-21 reauthorization out of the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee (EPW) and to the floor. The MAP-21 Reauthorization Act maintains funding at current levels plus inflation for four years. The bill includes very few policy overhauls from the original MAP-21 of 2012, as several of MAP-21's policies are still in the midst of early implementation. However, the EPW bill does contain language recommended by the Commission to modify the Primary Freight Network (PFN). The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) was tasked by Congress in MAP-21 to designate the PFN as part of developing the first national freight strategy. In late 2013, the Commission became concerned regarding the proposed PFN designation in Riverside County, which showed significant omissions on State Routes 60, 86, and 1-215 that belie local knowledge and experience of these routes' significance to freight. The gaps in the network appeared to be the result of several causes: a strict mileage limitation on the size of the PFN by Congress, a "numbers only" analysis by DOT, and a wide multitude of performance criteria considered by DOT. As the PFN designation is likely to be a major criterion for receipt of future funding from a federal goods movement program, the Commission believed it was important to close these gaps in the DOT draft designation. Commission staff proposed to Congress a process by which states and regions could be allowed to add mileage to the PFN for the purposes of closing gaps in the network, and for first/last mile connections to major freight hubs that may be off the highway system. This added flexibility allows for regions with intimate knowledge of their local freight movement patterns to finish -off the network in a logical manner that reflects how the PFN actually functions. After fruitful discussions with Congressional committees and other freight stakeholders, the Commission's recommendations on this need for state and regional flexibility were adopted in the EPW bill. Agenda Item 10 230 Despite this early good news, the fate of MAP-21 reauthorization is unclear at best. Several Senate committees must approve their portions of the bill before these can be combined on the Senate floor. The Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee has jurisdiction over freight issues and the Senate Banking Committee has jurisdiction over public transit issues. Perhaps most importantly, the Senate Finance Committee has jurisdiction over how the bill will be paid for. Given the looming insolvency of the Highway Trust Fund (HTF), a very tall political order faces Senate Finance to develop the "pay -for" to keep MAP-21 funding levels flat plus inflation as Senator Boxer has attempted. • On top of this, the House of Representatives must move forward on its own version of MAP-21 reauthorization before it is conferenced and sent to the President. In late May, House Republican leadership floated a proposal to temporarily keep the HTF afloat until May 2015. The House GOP proposal would patch the HTF from savings generated by ending Saturday mail deliveries by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). USPS reform has been an ongoing negotiation in j Congress for several years; halting Saturday deliveries remains controversial. Many analysts found the House proposal unconventional both from a transportation standpoint and a postal reform standpoint. Democrats roundly decried the House's proposal as unserious. Most Hill - watchers do not expect the proposal to advance. Nonetheless, the Senate has not yet put forward such a specific proposal of its own. In the mean time, the time draws nearer to when the HTF will dip below the $4 billion balance threshold that will result in DOT slowing or halting payments to states for projects. Commission staff will work proactively with Caltrans to address potential project impacts in Riverside County if the HTF shutdown indeed occurs. One of the Commission's top legislative priorities in Washington, D.C. state flexibility for substituting state environmental law for federal environmental law (NEPA reciprocity) was not included in Senator Boxer's bill and is not expected to emerge from the Senate. However, the House is a more likely place for such a proposal to advance; staff and Commission lobbyists will continue advocating for this issue over the summer. Attachments: 1) Legislative Matrix 2) CALCOG Policy Brief on Cap and Trade 3) CTC Highway Trust Fund Correspondence Dated — May 28, 2014 • Agenda Item 10 231 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION —June 2014 * A f i SB 1228 (Hueso) This bill continues the existence of the TCIF indefinitely in order to receive funds from non -Proposition 1B sources, and governs the distribution of non -Proposition 1B funds. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. (May 28, 2014) Referred to Com. On Trans. (June 2, 2014). SUPPORT IF AMENDED PENDING COMMISSION APPROVAL AB 2036 (Mansoor) Existing law authorizes certain toll facilities on public highways. This bill would authorize a toll facility to be initially implemented on a public highway within the boundaries of the County of Orange only if the toll facility is approved by a 2/3 vote of the electorate in the county, and would define "public highway' and "toll facility" for these purposes. in committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. (Feb. 28, 2014). OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED April 9, 2014 SB 1451 (Hill & Roth) An act to amend and repeal Section 21177 of the Public Resources Code, relating to environmental quality. This bill would require the alleged grounds for noncompliance shall have been presented to a public agency prior to the close of the public hearing on the project if the grounds for noncompliance were not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence during the public comment period or if no public comment period was provided by CEQA. The bill would limit the standing of a person objecting to the project prior to the close of the public hearing on the project before the filing of notice of determination to an action or proceeding challenging a project for which no public comment period was provided by CEQA. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. (May 6, 2014). SUPPORT April 9, 2014 AB 2651 (Linder) This bill would prohibit weight fee revenue from being transferred from the State Highway Account to the Transportation Debt Service Fund or to the Transportation Bond Direct Payment Account, and from being used to pay the debt service on transportation general obligation bonds. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. (April 21, 2014). SUPPORT April 9, 2014 HR 29 (Gomez) This nonbinding resolution of the State Assembly expresses opposition to "outsourcing of public services and assets, which harms transparency, accountability, shared prosperity, and competition." The resolution also supports, "processes that give public service workers the opportunity to develop their own plan on how to deliver cost-effective, high -quality services." The resolution references the Taxpayer Empowerment Agenda (TEA), a proposal by a group called "In the Public Interest", which is a project of a national coalition known as the Partnership for Working Families. Read. Amended. Adopted. (Ayes 44. Noes 22. Page 4332.) (April 3, 2014). OPPOSE April 9, 2014 AB 2728 (Perea) This bill would prohibit weight fee revenue from being transferred from the State Highway Account to the Transportation Debt Service Fund or to the Transportation Bond Direct Payment Account for the purpose of payment of the debt service on transportation general obligation bonds, and would also prohibit loans of weight fee revenue to the General Fund. In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission. (May 23, 2014). SUPPORT April 9, 2014 AB 515 (Dickinson) This bill pertains to CEQA reform. AB 515 proposes to require the courts to specify actions which must be taken by an agency to remedy CEQA violations and a timeframe within which those violations must be taken, From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re -referred to Com. On E.Q. (June 5, 2014). SEEK AMENDMENTS April 9, 2014 AB 2197 Wuilin) This bill would require that temporary license plate system be developed by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). AB 2197 would require this new system to be operative by July 1, 2015. This bill would ensure that all lawfully purchased vehicles leave the dealership with some form of identification that can be read from the roadway by law enforcement. In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission. (May 23, 2014). SUPPORT April 9, 2014 SI3 785 (Wolk) This bill consolidates a number of existing statutes authorizing local governments to use design -build for certain types of projects. Design -build for public transit projects is included in the consolidation. Referred to Com. On L. GOV. (May 8, 2014). SUPPORT IF AMENDED April 9, 2014 513 969 (DeSaulnier) The bill would require the agency administering a megaproject to establish a peer review group and to take specified actions to manage the risks associated with a megaproject including establishing a comprehensive risk management plan, and regularly reassessing its reserves for potential claims and unknown risks. Because this bill would require local agencies to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state -mandated local program. Referred to Com. On A. & A.R. (June 5, 2014) OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED April 9, 2014 SB 990 (Vidak) This bill would require that 5% of Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and funds from the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) be set -aside by agencies such as the Commission for disadvantaged small communities for congestion relief and safety needs. Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 8. Page 3312.) Reconsideration granted. (April 29, 2014). OPPOSE April 9, 2014 AB 1721 (Linder) SB 953 (Roth) Today, state law prohibits tolling of zero -emission vehicles in designated high - occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. This bill would exclude from the above -described exemption a toll imposed for passage in HOT lanes designated for State Highway Route 15 in Riverside County. This bill will provide parking enforcement authority to RCTC for the Metrolink commuter rail stations we own and operate for the residents of Riverside County. Passed Senate Transportation & Housing Committee. (June 10, 2014) Referred to Com. On TRANS. (May 29, 2014). SPONSOR SPONSOR January 8, 2014 January 8, 2014 AB 14 (Lowenthal) Formalizes creation of a State Freight Advisory Council and commits the state to authoring a State Freight Plan every 5 years, pursuant to MAP-21. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State — Chapter 223, Statutes of 2013. (Sept. 6, 2013). SUPPORT April 13, 2013 AB 179 (Boganegra) Previous version reduced the amount of time transportation agencies can retain personally identifiable customer information for electronically -collected highway tolls and transit fares, from 4.5 years to six months. Amendments extend the time period back to 4.5 years, removing a conflict with the statute of limitations during which customers can challenge tolls and fare charges, which is up to 4 years. The bill also enacts new privacy provisions for electronic transit fare collection. Unknown impacts exist for transit operators RTA, SunLine and Metrolink for future implementation of electronic fare systems. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State — Chapter 375, Statutes of 2013. (Sept. 27, 2013). NEUTRAL June 12, 2013 233 AB 266 (Blumenfield) Extends by an additional 10 years a pilot program previously opposed by RCTC. Ultra- low emission vehicles (mostly electric cars) are exempted from paying tolls on tolled facilities, except for toll projects in L.A. County. This bill represents a state mandate that cuts into local revenue for infrastructure that local governments are providing to the state. This policy erodes the user -pay concept inherent in many areas of transportation finance. This bill represents a current and future threat to the viability of innovative infrastructure financing in California as low -emission vehicles become more popular. The pilot program has only been in existence for less than one year. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State — Chapter 405, Statutes of 2013. (Sept. 28, 2013). OPPOSE April 13, 2013 AB 487 (Linder) Requires government employees participating in the DMV confidentiality program to provide a workplace address so that parking, toll, and traffic violations can still be enforced. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution. (Jan. 31, 2014). From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. (Feb. 3, 2014). SUPPORT April 13, 2013 AB 574 (Lowenthal) Formerly, this bill reformed the process by which cities and counties apply to the State for relinquishment of state highways to local jurisdictions. The bill has been amended in its entirety. The bill now proposes policy to guide the expenditure of the state's cap -and -trade program, which was authorized by AB 32 (Pavley, 2006) and is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The bill- provides for regional control of the expenditure of cap -and -trade funds. The Commission, along with SCAG and other transportation commissions in Southern California have requested amendments that would direct cap -and -trade funds to directly to transportationcommissionsrather than Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO's) Died pursuant to. Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution. (Jan. 31, 2014). From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. (Feb. 3, 2014). SUPPORT IF AMENDED June 12, 2013 AB 1081 (Medina) Requires goods movement infrastructure projects and financing options from the private sector to be included in the Governor's annually submitted 5-year infrastructure plan and international trade & investment strategy. In committee: Held under submission. (August 30, 2013). SUPPORT June 12, 2013 SB 337 (Emmerson) Relinquishes portions of SR-74 to the City of Hemet. The City of Hemet is the sponsor of this bill. This bill builds on previous legislation that authorized relinquishment of SR-74 to the Cities of Palm Desert, Perris, and Lake Elsinore. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56. (Feb. 3, 2014) Hearing cancelled at request of author. This bill's language has been incorporated into SB 788, the Senate Transportation Omnibus Bill. SUPPORT April 13, 2013 SB 731 (Steinberg) A Enacts modest changes to CEQA, mostly relating to private development. dk4 Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3247). Set, First hearing. Hearing cancelled at the request of author. (Sept. 11, 2013). MONITOR/ WORK WITH AUTHOR April 13, 2013 Alk AB 37 (Perea) This bill would allow would allow project applicants to require lead agencies to prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of CEQA documents. This has the potential to accelerate future judicial proceedings by giving both sides of a CEQA lawsuit the opportunity to prepare for court. AB 37 is supported by business groups and is currently unopposed, awaiting a vote on the Assembly floor. Re -referred to Com. On L. & I.R. (Aug. 14, 2013). SUPPORT June 12, 2013 AB 401 (Daly) Authorizes the use of best value design -build for the 1-405 widening project by OCTA. The language of this bill is nearly identical to that of the Commission's AB 2098 (Miller), which was approved in 2010. The project will add one general purpose lane in each direction. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State — Chapter 586, Statutes of 2013. (Oct. 5, 2013). SUPPORT June 12, 2013 AB 543 (Campos) This bill would require a lead agency to translate, as specified, certain notices required by the act and a summary of any negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report when a group of non -English-speaking people, as defined, comprises at least 25% of the population within the lead agency's jurisdiction and the project is proposed to be located at or near an area where the group of non- English -speaking people comprises at least 25% of the residents of that area. By requiring a lead agency to translate these notices and documents, this bill would impose a state -mandated local program. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. (May 19, 2014). OPPOSE June 12, 2013 AB 756 (Melendez) Allows public works projects to be granted Leadership designation by the Governor for the purposes of a 2011 law that provides expedited judicial review for CEQA challenges. The Commission seeks amendments that would clarify elgibility of regional transportation agencies (such as the Commission) to utilize this fast -tracking for public transit projects. Note: the underlying 2011 law has recently been ruled unconstitutional. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution. (Jan. 31, 2014). From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. (Feb. 3, 2014). SUPPORT if Amended June 12, 2013 SB 778 (Committee on Transportation 8 Housing) Senate "omnibus" bill of non -controversial items. This omnibus includes language from SB 337 (Emmerson), which relinquishes SR-74 to the city of Hemet. Other provisions of the bill include non -substantive technical corrections to existing law and deletion of obsolete provisions such as the 1984 Olympics special license plate program. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56. (Feb. 3, 2014). SUPPORT June 12, 2013 AB 493 (Daly) This bill would authorize operators of toll facilities on federal -aid highways to fully implement technologies or business practices that provide for the interoperability of electronic toll collection programs on and after the date specified in MAP-21. The bill would limit the information that may be disclosed through participation in an interoperability program, as specified. Approved by the Governor. (Aug. 12, 2013). Chaptered by Secretary of State — Chapter 79, Statutes of 2013. (Aug. 12, 2013). SUPPORT June 12, 2013 235 ATTACHMENT 2 CAP &. TIME POLICY BRIEF TRANSIT, HOUSING, & SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM California Association of Councils of Governments Last week, the Legislature adopted —and the Governor signed —a budget for FY 2014-15 that includes the first investment plan for Cap and Trade auction revenues. This brief outlines the main points of interest for regional transportation planning agencies, summarizes the scope of key programs, and provides selected language from SB 852 (allocations) and SB 862 (cap and trade program trailer bill). 1. The Big News: Ongoing Appropriation. Only two categories (totaling 60% of future revenues) get multi -year allocations: Transit, Housing, and Sustainable Communities (35%) and High -Speed Rail (25 %). Other program areas will be subject to the annual budget process. See chart, next page. 2. But FY 14-15 is Different. Funding is different the first year largely because of a $200 million allocation to clean transportation. Thus, $130 million is allocated to affordable housing and sustainable communities; and $50 million for transit split evenly between the Transit Capital and Transit Operations. An additional $242 million for non - transportation related programs for energy, water, waste diversion, and weatherization. 3. Reporting and Quantification. The Air Resource Board will develop guidance on GHG reporting and quantification methods for all state agencies that receive appropriations to ensure that the requirements of AB 32 are met. 4. Strategic Growth Council Change. The Senate and Assembly each get to appoint a public member to the Strategic Growth Council —making the council 3 public members and seven senior members of the Administration. June 23, 2014 *Non, 5. 20% for Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities. This funding is subject to a specific set of rules and guidelines: i. Half for Housing. Half (10%) must be used for affordable housing. SGC will be the lead agency, though SGC likely will "leverage" HCD's expertise. ii. "Other Half' Eligibility. Threshold eligibilities include projects typically included in a regional transportation plan (see table on page 3). But it also includes agriculture mitigation and undefined "other programs." Distribution Undetermined. The distribution method is to be determined; no provision is made for regional parity, though non-MPO areas are included. 1100 K Street, Suite 101. Sacramento, CA 95814 • (916) 557-1170 • www.calcog.org 236 CAP &