Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout03 March 11, 2015 Commission" " " TIME/DATE: LOCATION: Riverside Counly Transportation Commission MEETING AGENDA 9:30 a.m. I Wednesday, March 11, 2015 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside 8Jla COMMISSIONERS "'1t Chair-Daryl Busch Vice Chair -Scott Matas Second Vice Chair -John F. Tavaglione Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside To Be Appointed, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Deborah Franklin I Art Welch, City of Banning Brenda Knight/ Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck I Tim Wade, City of Blythe Ella Zanowic /Jim Hyatt, City of Calimesa Dawn Haggerty I Jordan Ehrenkranz, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis I Shelley Kaplan, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez/ To Be Appointed, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel/ Eugene Montanez, City of Corona Scott Matas I Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush/ Clint Larimore, City of Eastvale Linda Krupa/ Robert Youssef, City of Hemet Dana Reed/ Ted Mertens, City of Indian Wells Troy Strange/ Glenn Miller, City of Indio Frank Johnston I Brian Berkson, City of Jurupa Valley Robert Radi /To Be Appointed, City of La Quinta Bob Magee I Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann I Wallace Edgerton, City of Menifee Jesse Molina/ Jeffrey J. Giba, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs/ Jonathan Ingram, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna/ Kathy Azevedo, City of Norco Jan Harnik I Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat/ Paul Lewin, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch/ Rita Rogers, City of Perris Ted Weill I To Be Appointed, City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams/ Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk /Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Michael S. Naggar /Chuck Washington, City of Temecula Ben Benoit/ Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar Basem Muallem, Governor's Appointee RECORDS Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. COMM-COMM-00045 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: To: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 1 :56 PM Tara Byerly Cc: Jennifer Harmon Subject: RCTC: March Commission Agenda -03.11.2015 Importance: High Good afternoon Commissioners: The March Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, March 11, 2015 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://rctc.org/uploads/media items/march-commission-agenda.original.pdf Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant RCTC 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: To: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 2:02 PM Tara Byerly Subject: RCTC: March Commission Agenda -03.11.2015 Importance: High Good afternoon Commission Alternates: The March Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for March 11, 2015 @ 9:30 a.m. is posted. http://rctc.org/uploads/media items/march-commission-agenda.original.pdf Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant RCTC 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30a.m. Wednesday, March 11, 2015 BOARDROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951} 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. 2. 3. 4. s. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS -Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30} minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -JANUARY 14, 2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 11, 2015 Page 2 6. PUBLIC HEARING -ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT, TEMPORARY BUILDING ACCESS EASEMENT, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS EASEMENT, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY DEMOLITION CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 101-170-038 LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Overview Pagel This item is for the Commission to: 1) 2) 3) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of amendment to resolution of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected property and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the owner. Adopt Amended Resolution of Necessity No. 13-073, "Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition. of Property Interests in Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel No. 101-170-038 located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), Between Pierce Street on the East to the Riverside/Orange County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California. 7. ADDITIONS I REVISIONS -The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. • • • " " " Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 11, 2015 Page 3 8. CONSENT CALENDAR -All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. SA. FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Page35 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve a net increase of $885,000 in Fiscal Year 2014/15 expenditures for mid-year budget adjustments. 8B. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page37 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2014. BC. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Page45 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 3 2014 (Q3 2014). SD. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page53 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. SE. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Page BS Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the second quarter ended December 31, 2014 . Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 11, 2015 Page4 SF. APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR COOPERATIVE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL PROJECT BETWEEN THE COMMISSION AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN-SPACE DISTRICT Page87 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) 2) 3) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 15-67-059-00 with the Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District (District) for project management services to complete the design phase and manage the construction phase of the Santa Ana River Trail Project (Project). The MOU will reimburse the Commission's cost to perform project management services for managing the completion of design, construction management, and construction contracts for the Project; Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute agreements with the District to reflect non-funding changes related to the • 4) Project on behalf of the Commission; and • Approve an increase of $250,000 in FY 2014/15 budgeted revenues and expenditures for project management services related to the Project. 8G. TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT, INCLUDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN AND LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE PLAN Page99 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the Title VI Program Report, including the Public Participation Plan and Language Assistance Plan in compliance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements. SH. OPERATION OF THE FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Page ZOO Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 15-45-027-00 with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the operation of the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program in the amount of $1,635,846 in state funding for • FY 2014/15; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. " " " Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 11, 2015 Page 5 9. PROPOSED POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 BUDGET Page212 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Budget. 10. COACHELLA VALLEY-SAN GORGONIO PASS RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY -PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Page220 Overview This item is for the Commission to review and comment on the draft Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Study Purpose and Need Statement. 11. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 12. 13. Page231 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive an update on state and federal legislation; 2) Adopt a Support position on SB 321 (Beall); and 3) Add to the Commission's Legislative Platform: "Support legislation that reduces the volatility of state/federal transportation revenue.,, ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA COMMISSIONERS/ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities . Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 11, 2015 Page 6 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (d)(4) of Government Code Section 54956.9 Potential Number of Case(s): 1 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(l) Case No(s). RIC 1309727 15. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside . • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL March 11, 2015 County of Riverside, District I County of Riverside, District II County of Riverside, District Ill County of Riverside, District IV County of Riverside, District V City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Eastvale City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of Jurupa Valley City of La Quinta City of Lake Elsinore City of Menifee City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula City of Wildomar Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 Absent , . .,.,, J CJ n ,.-c, LI OfLI\ ' vc.u. ~ ' .:n"-"" D llAA; ve.c\ e._ q '3~ ~ D LI D Cl D LI D Cl D LI D LI D Cl D LI D LI D LI D LI D LI D l:J ~ D LI D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONER SIGN-IN SHEET MARCH 11, 2015 NAME AGENCY E_MAIL ADDRESS DATE3/11 IL5 I I DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS:. ________________ _ AGENDA ITEM NO.: #"6' SUBJECT OF A ~ ) ~ I l I f llke .J_ (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) AGENDA ITEM: rrea ~e..5D () r/Dn 0 ~SSifl/ NAME: _/1 f chG\B ( lkbce PHONE NO.: "flfCt) Q} -]1..7'!( ADDRESS: ~Go1 ;t1ajn s±ree+ .Ste., /-:!DC.J 1.cv,.V\e °' 'AD'.t 4 STREET CITY ZIP CODE REPRESENTING: A. lls,·2e S±o~~~ Ia: .. NAME OF AGENCY I 0 AN ZATION I GROUP PHONE NO.:. _______ _ ZIP CODE Bus1NEss ADDREss: 2 JR.S Pv.. l iSc.d e.s .De Cwvvi~ STREET CITY ~ DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: :..? -I I -;s" CHECK IF ?UBJECT OF --PUBLIC COMMENTS: ~ PUBLIC COMMENTS: ~ tJ / 5 (!rt JZ/f /~ ....( U /'?ff/~ 1i_ AGENDA ITEM NO.: (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) NAME: i-.voc(!=/ r//7/1//////VC> PHONE NO.: 7(-:cJ t?/J?' W~ ADDRESS: 2.3t51/ J//_3/f N/f-t.!.. L p?'4t:.&-l//l?/A/y,J. 9'2?~~ STREET CITY ZIP CODE REPRESENTING: St!?~/// w$->2: /-Z/f/L /7,45.J /JS-5o< PHONE NO.:,/~o ,;-2/r W~ NAME OF AGENCY I ORGANIZATION I GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: ____________________________ _ STREET CITY ZIP CODE rc:tgt: 1 Ul 1 ~ 2015 California Passenger Rail Summit Home About Us Support us Register Program lodgirog Contact Us Speeches and PresEOmtations Tue & Wed, April 28 & 29, 2015 Save The Date! Tuesday, April 28, 2015 (5 P.M. -9 P.M.) Kickoff Reception to be held in the Roundhouse at the California State Railroad Museum at 125 I Street. Sacramento, CA 95814. Wednesday, April 29, 2015 (9 A.M.-4 P.M., Registration Opens at 8 A. M.) Panel Discussions and Presentations to be held at Sacramento City Hall at 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. These are interesting times for passenger rail development in California. The state is on the verge of significant enhancements to the passenger rail system. The modernization and integration of the passenger rail services that is being led by the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) and the Federal Railroad Administration, working with transportation agencies throughout the state, are creating an environment of investment in passenger rail infrastructure that has been unparalleled in recent years and will continue to grow. Join us at the third annual summit as we meet with leaders in the industry for discussions regarding the modernization and integration of passenger rail service in California. Speakers will discuss funding, development, and strategic approaches to the growth of passenger rail in the state. Joining us at this event will be state and federal representatives, passenger rail agencies, and other leaders working together to shape the future of passenger rail. Sponsorship opportunities are available. Click here for more information. Please email us at info@californiaoassenqerrailsummit.com if you have questions or comments. Click Here for report and photos from the 2014 California Passenger Rail Summit. Supporting Organizations (as of February 2015): ·~· fiilltE~ll !:'.!!~ LOSSAN (9 Metro /a\CI{CC~sLOCOG coast rail cocndu1atrng council ·. ·(S -----Sunl1nc Home About Us Support Us Register Program lodging Contact Us Speeches and Presentations 2,209 View Stats I Page updated:03/03/2015 I Copyrighl©2015 California Passenger Rail Summit I Web hosting provided by TrainWeb LLC http://californiapassengerrailsummit.com/ 3/10/2015 " " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Daryl Busch at 9:39 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. 4. Commissioner Scott Matas led the Commission in a flag salute. ROLL CALL Commissioners/ Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Steve Adams Linda Krupa Jan Harnik Marion Ashley Andrew Kotyuk Steven Hernandez Ben Benoit Paul Lewin Jesse Molina John J. Benoit Bob Magee Greg Pettis David Bricker Scott Mann* Adam Rush Daryl Busch Scott Matas Karen Spiegel Joseph DeConinck Robert Radi Troy Strange Jordan Ehrenkranz John F. Tavaglione City of Indian Wells Deborah Franklin Ted Weill City of Temecula Rick Gibbs Ella Zanowic County of Riverside -District 3 Berwin Hanna Kevin Jeffries Frank Johnston Brenda Knight *Arrived after the meeting was called to order PUBLIC COMMENTS Chair Busch welcomed and introduced Commissioner Robert Radi representing the city of La Quinta. At this time, Anne Mayer, Executive Director and Chair Busch presented Past Chair Marion Ashley with a plaque to commemorate his tenure as Chair for 2014. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 14, 2015 Page 2 Commissioner Marion Ashley expressed appreciation for working with staff, which he believes makes the job as Chair effortless. He wished Chair Busch the best of luck for 2015. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES-DECEMBER 10, 2014 M/S/C (Adams/B. Benoit) to approve the December 10, 2014 minutes as submitted. Abstain: Lewin and Radi 6. ADDITIONS/ REVISIONS There was additional information to Agenda Item 11, "State Cap and Trade Funding and Disadvantaged Communities". 7. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Hanna/Franklin) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. • 7 A. FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2012/13 AND 2013/14 FEDERAL TRANSIT • ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5310 ENHANCED MOBILITY FOR SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM 1) Approve the Federal Fiscal Years 2012/13 and 2013/14 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5310 Riverside County project funding recommendations by the local review committee (LRC); 2) Adopt Resolution No. 15-001, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Certifying Project Consistency with Regional Transportation Plan", certifying the projects are derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan (Coordinated Plan); and 3) Include the projects in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). 78. 2015 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND PREVIEW 1) Adopt the Commission's 2015 State and Federal Legislative Platform; and 2) Receive and file a report on state and federal legislation for 2015. 7C. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH NINYO AND MOORE TO MANAGE AND IMPLEMENT PROPERTY REMEDIATION FOR THE FORMER LISTON ALUMINUM BRICK COMPANY SITE • " " " Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 14, 2015 Page 3 8. 1) Approve Agreement No. 12-73-110-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 12-73-110-00, with Ninyo and Moore to continue to manage and implement the approved Department of Toxic Substances Control Remedial Action Plan for the Liston Aluminum Brick Company (Liston Brick) property in an additional amount of $750,000 plus a contingency amount of $112,500 for a total additional amount of $862,500, resulting in a total amount not to exceed $1,698,095; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work as may be required for the project; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute non-funding related agreements for the completion of the remediation clearance of the project; and 5) Approve an increase of $862,500 in FY 2014/15 budgeted expenditures for the additional remediation costs related to the Liston Brick property. FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 MID-YEAR REVENUE PROJECTIONS Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, presented Agenda Items 8 and 9 concurrently, highlighting the following areas: " Annual revenue projections for FYs 2014/15 and 2015/16; " Measure A and Local Transportation Fund (LTF) taxes; " Revenue forecast highlights; " Activity and trends by economic category; " Activity and trends by economic segments; " Measure A tax revenues, revenue allocation, and revenue program allocation; " LTF sales tax revenues; " Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee revenues; and " Next steps. At this time, Commissioner Scott Mann joined the meeting. M/S/C (Gibbs/Johnston) to: 1) 2) Approve the mid-year FY 2014/15 revenue projections of $167 million for Measure A revenues, $81.5 million for Local Transportation Fund (L TF) revenues, and $12 million for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues; Approve the budget increase adjustments to LTF transfers in of $276,400, and expenditures and transfers out of $345,500 to reflect the revised L TF projections; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 14, 2015 Page 4 3) Approve the budget increase adjustments to TUMF revenues of $4 million to reflect the revised TUMF projections. 9. FISCAL VEAR 2015/16 REVENUE PROJECTIONS M/S/C (Gibbs/Johnston) to: 1) Approve the projections for Measure A revenues of $170 million for FY 2015/16; 2) Approve the projections of the Local Transportation Fund (L TF) apportionment of $83 million for the Western Riverside County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley areas for FY 2015/16; and 3) Approve the projections for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of $12 million for FY 2015/16. 10. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM REVISIONS Jillian Guizado, Staff Analyst, presented the revised SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program evaluation criteria and policies. At this time, Commissioner Steve Adams left the meeting. Anne Mayer expressed her appreciation and acknowledged all of the volunteers from the Technical Advisory Committee to work on these revised policies. This is one of the Commission's most highly anticipated competitions and it is an important program for several jurisdictions to complete the sidewalk, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. She expressed appreciation to Jillian Guizado for her leadership in guiding this effort. M/S/C (Johnston/Zanowic) to adopt the revised SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program evaluation criteria and policies. At this time, Commissioner Bob Magee left the meeting. 11. STATE CAP AND TRADE FUNDING AND DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director, presented the Cap and Trade funding and disadvantaged communities, highlighting the following areas: • Cap and trade (CAT); • Legislation on CAT and the current state budget; • • • Disadvantaged communities -Why it's important; Defining Disadvantaged; A map depicting the disadvantaged communities in Riverside County; • • • " " " Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 14, 2015 Page 5 " Defining disadvantaged pollution burden and population factors; " Putting it all together -Upcoming opportunities; " The strategic Growth Council, upcoming opportunities, and reaching out; and " Looking to the future -Future considerations. At this time, Commissioner Rick Gibbs left the meeting. Commissioner Scott Mann referred to the Riverside County disadvantaged communities map and requested clarification as there appears to be no correlation between a federally designated disadvantaged community and what California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designates as disadvantaged community. He suggested discussing this at the committee level since he has two federally designated communities that are severely disadvantaged and may be eligible for federal funding. John Standiford explained staff is looking into a way to appeal these findings and will return to the Commission with an answer. Anne Mayer stated one of the challenges is the use of term "disadvantaged communities" as it varies by context. She stated there will be a number of discussions about the use of this screening tool, how it is implemented, and ranked, particularly due to the initial results as it did not meet people's expectations. She explained this screening tool was developed in such a way that it helps the administration achieve its the goals. She explained even though the Commission will not be an applicant for these funds, staff is tracking this very carefully from a policy and legislative standpoint and participating in monitoring the guideline development to ensure the local and regional prospective is communicated. M/S/C to receive and file a report on state policies regarding State Cap and Trade (CAT) funding and Disadvantaged Communities policies. 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar. 13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 13A. Anne Mayer announced: " The 91 flyers titled "The Main Squeeze" were distributed to the Commissioners and a press conference is scheduled on January 15, regarding Main Street in the city of Corona will be reduced down to two lanes in each direction, and closing the eastbound on ramp for 15- months; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 14, 2015 Page 6 • The Commission Workshop will be held on January 29-30, 2015 at the Hyatt Palm Springs. At this time, Commissioner Kevin Jeffries and Caltrans representative David Bricker left the meeting. 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(l) Case No(s). RIC 10013330, RIC 1309727, RIC 1309887, and RIC 1405643 Commissioner John Benoit recused himself from the discussion on Case No. RIC 1405643 There were no announcements from closed session item(s). 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, adjourned the meeting at 11:07 a.m. The Commission Workshop is scheduled to be held on Thursday-Friday, January 29-30, 2015, Hyatt Palm Springs, 285 North Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, February 11, 2015, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board • • • " " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director Adoption of Amendment to Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition of Permanent Access Easement, Temporary Building Access Easement, Temporary Construction Access Easement, Temporary Construction Easement, and Temporary Demolition Construction Easement Interests in SUBJECT: Portions of Certain Real Property by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel No. 101-170-038 Located in Corona, Riverside County, California, for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Between Pierce Street on the East to the County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the adoption of amendment to resolution of necessity, including providing all parties interested in the affected property and their attorneys, or their representatives, an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the resolutions of necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer of just compensation has been made to the owner. 3) Adopt Amended Resolution of Necessity No. 13-073, "Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition of Property Interests in Certain Real Property, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel No. 101-170-038 located in Corona, Riverside County, California", for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project {SR-91 CIP), Between Pierce Street on the East to the Riverside/Orange County Line on the West, in Riverside County, California. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is being asked to consider the adoption of an amended resolution of necessity to acquire the interests in the parcel listed below. These interests are required for construction of the SR-91 CIP . Agenda Item 6 1 The power of eminent domain is used by the Commission only as a last resort to obtain interests necessary for public highway projects after 1) negotiations have stalled; 2) the owner requested the Commission proceed directly to eminent domain for tax or other advantages; or 3) the eminent domain process is necessary to clear the title to the property. In this case, an offer of just compensation has been made to the owner for the full Fair Market Value as determined by an appraisal. Commission staff attempted to negotiate amicable settlements in good faith, and will continue to do so throughout the process. Fair Market Value is defined by the state of California and is one of the most inclusive definitions in the United States. It requires the highest and best use of the property be considered. All of the Commission's appraisals must meet the California definition of Fair Market Value. One of the requirements for acquiring property for improvement projects is that an offer of just compensation be made to the owners of the property. The Commission makes these offers in person whenever possible. The amount of compensation is determined by appraisals prepared by independent appraisal firms licensed by the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers. The content of these appraisals, what elements are considered in them, and the methodologies used in the preparation are all proscribed by various laws and the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP), published by the Appraisal Foundation. The Federal Government recognizes the USPAP as generally accepted appraisal standards and requires USPAP compliance for appraisers in federally related transactions. Every appraisal calculates the market value of the acquisition as defined by the California Code of Civil Procedure, based on the highest and best use, as defined in USPAP, and includes consideration of severance damages and project benefits (also defined in the California Code of Civil Procedure). In every case, the owner is invited to accompany the appraiser during the site visit so that as much information as possible is considered in the appraisal. A review appraisal prepared by a different certified appraiser is then conducted to ensure all proper procedures have been followed. Additionally, in accordance with state law, every owner is offered up to $5,000 to reimburse them for the cost to have their own appraisal prepared. Staff will bring to the Commission those interests that meet one of the criteria above. The timing of these resolutions will balance the need to give the owners as much time as possible to reach an agreement, while at the same time allowing enough time for the Commission to go through the process to obtain possession in time to avoid delays to the design-build contractor. The legal process from adoption of the resolutions of necessity to receiving legal possession of the properties takes approximately 150 days. California eminent domain law provides that a public entity may not commence with eminent domain proceedings until its governing body adopted a resolution of necessity, which resolution may only be adopted after the governing body has given each party with an interest in the affected property, or their representatives, a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: Agenda Item 6 2 • • • " " " 1) 2) 3) 4) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. Since an agreement has not been reached with the property owner, it may be necessary to acquire necessary interests by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is accomplished by the Commission's adoption of resolutions of necessity for the affected properties. Record property owners must be afforded an opportunity to appear at the hearing and lodge objections. A notice of this hearing was sent by first class mail to the owner, and stated the Commission's intent to consider the adoption of resolutions, the right of the property owners to appear and be heard on these issues, and that failure to file a written request to appear would result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission scheduled this hearing at which all persons who filed a written request in compliance with applicable law may appear and be heard. Aerial views of the parcel subject to this staff report in relation to the SR- 91 CIP are attached. Finding 1: Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project SR-91 in Riverside County ranks among the nation's worst commutes. Stop and go traffic is the norm, especially during morning and late afternoon rush hours. Traffic congestion on eastbound SR-91 between the cities of Anaheim and Corona is routinely among the worst 15 areas in the nation. SR-91 is continuing to experience increased congestion as a result of population growth in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties and the increase in jobs in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Demographic projections for the Southern California Association of Governments region show population and employment in Riverside and Orange Counties are forecast to increase substantially by 2035. As a result, traffic volumes on SR-91 are expected to increase by approximately SO percent by 2035, which would result in even greater congestion and delays on SR-91. The existing travel demand on SR-91 has led to a heavy directional commute pattern between Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside Counties that is projected to continue into the future. SR-91 is the only major highway that links Orange and Riverside Counties. Extending from the Orange County/Riverside County line in the city of Corona to Pierce Street in Riverside, the SR- 91 CIP will add mixed flow lanes, tolled express, improve interchanges, bridges, ramps, and local streets. New freeway to freeway ramp connections between the SR-91 and Interstate 15 also will be made . Agenda Item 6 3 The SR-91 CIP is designed to reduce delays, improve air quality, offer a choice between regular (mixed flow) lanes and express lanes, allow faster emergency response, relieve local street congestion, and provide better access to public transit and commuter rail. Finding 2: The Project is Planned or Located in a Manner Most Compatible with Greatest Public Good and Least Private Injury A thorough analysis was conducted to find the single best location for the SR-91 CIP. Environmental analyses and findings indicate the chosen alignment uniquely satisfies engineering, public health, and environmental issues, and is the most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. To minimize private injury, a thorough analysis regarding the need for each property and each interest was conducted in the planning stages of the SR-91 CIP. Efforts during the planning stages included conducting public outreach meetings and seeking feedback about the SR-91 CIP alignment and potential impacts. Staff also met regularly with various local agencies and businesses to determine if modifications to the alignment were necessary to minimize impacts. These efforts continued over the course of years to ensure the alignment design achieved the greatest public good with the least private injury. • As part of the acquisition process, unless settlement was reached within the first 30 days after an offer was made, every property owner was provided an opportunity to participate in meetings with project staff. The goal of these meetings was to minimize private injury not only • on the basis of information staff obtained through the planning process, but also on the information provided by the property owners. As a result, staff has in some cases included mitigation measures to reduce and minimize impacts to the property. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act has been satisfied by Caltrans' certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) in its role as lead agency on August 8, 2012, and the Commission's subsequent consideration of that certified EIR in its role as a responsible agency on November 14, 2012. Finding 3: The Real Property to be Acquired is Necessary for the Project The property interests sought below have been analyzed to determine if a feasible design alternative that exists would alleviate the need for the interest. As indicated above, the property owners of the interests were invited to meet with project staff and provide input to address any concerns the property owners may have with the design of the SR-91 CIP in the manner proposed and the necessity of the acquisition. To the extent the property owners raised such concerns; staff took those concerns into consideration and attempted to make design modifications as feasible as possible. In the end, staff recommends the following interests in real property are necessary for the project. Agenda Item 6 4 • " Amended RON No. 13-073 -Owner: Al/size Storage Corona, Inc., a California corporation; APN 101-170-038; CPNs 22114-7, 22114-8, 22114-9, 22114-10, and 22114-11 " " The real property commonly known as Assessor Parcel No. 101-170-038 is owned in fee by Allsize Storage Corona, Inc., a California corporation (Allsize) and is located at 2785 Palisades Drive, in Corona, California. The property is bounded by SR-91 to the north, Palisades Drive to the south, residential properties to the east, and vacant land to the west. The property is roughly triangular in shape and has a site area of approximately 312,009 square feet. The property is improved with four storage buildings, associated parking lot, and other improvements. Improvements to be acquired include a portion of Building 4 (northern~most building), along with parking lot improvements, fencing/gates and irrigated landscaping. The loss of 700 square feet to the building will result in a net permanent loss of six enclosed rental units and a temporary loss of three other units. Other affected improvements will either be protected in place or replaced in kind by the project contractor. It is now necessary to acquire permanent access easement, temporary building access easement, temporary construction access easement, temporary construction easement, and temporary demolition construction easement interests. These easement interests are necessary because access through the Allsize facility will be the only way for Caltrans to inspect and maintain, a drainage culvert under SR-91 that drains freeway runoff and runoff from a residential community on the east side of the Allsize facility from the south side of the freeway to the north side toward the Santa Ana River . Accordingly, staff seeks to amend Resolution of Necessity No. 13-073 to acquire the needed additional interests in the subject property, including any improvements located thereon. An offer of just compensation for the additional property interests was made to the property owner on December 10, 2014. Legal definition(s), legal description(s) and/or plat map(s) of the portions sought to be acquired are attached as an exhibit to Amended Resolution of Necessity No. 13-073. An aerial view of the parcel and the parcel's relationship to the SR-91 CIP is also attached. A Notice of Hearing was mailed to the property owner(s) on February 6, 2015. Finding 4: Offers of Just Compensation Have Been Made to the Property Owners A litigation guarantee was obtained from Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company to confirm and identify the parties with an interest in the parcel affected by the SR-91 CIP. The Commission then served the affected property owner and other interested parties as appropriate, with a notice of the Commission's decision to appraise the property. The Commission had the real property interests appraised by Scott A. Lidgard, MAI, CCIM, of the real estate appraisal firm of Lidgard and Associates, Inc. to establish the Fair Market Value of the property interests the Commission is seeking to acquire from the parties identified herein . Agenda Item 6 5 Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the property interests, based on the approved appraisals, as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. In this instance, the Commission will acquire the interests necessary and set forth above from the property owners to ensure the property will be available to meet the time frames associated with the construction of the SR-91 CIP. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact due to adoption of the resolution of necessity. All property acquisition expenses are included in the SR-91 CIP budget. Attachment: Amended Resolution No. 13-073 Agenda Item 6 6 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 13-073 RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT, TEMPORARY BUILDING ACCESS EASEMENT, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS EASEMENT, TEMPORARY DEMOLITION CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 101-170-038, LOCATED IN CORONA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, WHICH COVERS THE AREA BETWEEN PIERCE STREET ON THE EAST TO THE COUNTY LINE ON THE WEST, IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire permanent access easement, temporary construction access easement, temporary building access easement, temporary demolition construction easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 101-170-038 (CPNs 22114-7, 22114-8, 22114-9, 22114-10 and 22114-11) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and sections 1240.110 and 1240-.120 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission, and the affected property owner and other interested parties were afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for permanent access easement, temporary 7 construction access easement, temporary building access easement, temporary demolition construction easement and temporary construction easement interests in portions of property to be acquired is for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire, by eminent domain, property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal definitions, legal descriptions and assessor parcel map of the portions of the parcel upon which the permanent access easement, temporary construction access easement, temporary building access easement, temporary demolition construction easement and temporary construction easement interests to be acquired by the Commission are located, and which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; ( c) The property defined, described and/or depicted in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and ( d) The offer required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code was made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interests to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights of way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights of way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described interests subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property affected by the interests to be acquired is subject to easements and rights of way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the 8 • • • " Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public uses pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the affected real property that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. " " Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non- material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action, or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation for the project for which the real property is being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption . APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of March, 2015. Daryl R. Busch, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 9 " " Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission. (The rights being acquired may be exercised mutually exclusive of each other.) "Permanent Access Easement" (CPN 22114-7) grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement, to construct, reconstrnct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned or public facilities, constrnction site, or right of way, as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, stmcture or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC wi11 not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. "Temporary Construction Access Easement" (CPN 22114-8) refers to a temporary easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to constrnct, reconstrnct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or constmct, or permit to be erected or constmcted, any building, strncture or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, bmsh, or other vegetation from time to time as detennined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior " 17336.02100\9547966.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 OF 21 11 written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent ofRCTC. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Temporary B.uilding Access Easement" (CPN 22114-9) refers to a non-exclusive temporary easement and right of way in favor ofRCTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to traverse and maintain an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction sites, as detennined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under, and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. • Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees • or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation for the duration of the easement as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent ofRCTC, its successors and assigns. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. I 7336.02 l 00\9547966.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 OF 21 12 • " " " "Temporary Demolition Construction Easement" (CPN 22114-10) refers to an exclusive temporary easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns, for the purpose of demolition, construction, reconstruction, and repair of the building and improvements located therein, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Temporary Construction Easement (TCE)" (CPN 22114-11) refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project. With respect to CPN 22114-11, such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder . 17336.02100\954 7966. l EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 OF 21 13 " 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 lS " 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 " PSOMAS EXIITBIT 'Gl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22114-7 Permanent Access Easement APN 101-170-038 In the City of Corona, Cowity of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in those certain documents recorded January 4, 1991 as Document No. 005040 and July 21, 1993 as Document No. 280866 both of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly comer of the lands described in said Document No. 005040; thence North 57�49'26" West 5.00' feet along the southwesterly line of said lands to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 57�49'26" West 22.00 feet continuing along said southwesterly line to a point thereon; thence North 32�09'13" East 401.30 feet along a line parallel with and 27.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly line of said lands of both documents referenced herein to a point on the northeasterly line of the lands described in said Document No. 280866; thence South 30�18'47" East 24.81 feet along said northeasterly line to a point thereon; thence South 32�09'13" West 389.84 feet along a line parallel with and 5.00 feet northwesterly of the aforesaid southeasterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 8, 703 square feet. Sec Exhibit 'G2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:\2PTGO I OSOi ~URVEY\LEGALS\22114_ APN _ JOJ-170-038\Legals\22114-7-P AE .doc 11111/2014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 OF 21 15 Page I of2 PSOMAS 2 3 Prepared under the direction of 4 : dE..~,/b{ /J~ll-14- 7 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 \ 31 P:\2PTGOl050l\SUR VEY\LEGALS\22l I 4_APN_I 01-170-038\Legals\22114-7-PAE .doc 1111112014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 OF 21 16 Page2 of2 " " " PARCEL# 22114-7 SJ�:~~~~~_(R) J -, I I I I I I l I -c1 t1 __ .-..I --0::1 --, w' " I WI L01 1/-i" q-I o I <OJ 01 Zr LINE TABLE L 1 -N20�57'27"E LEGEND TITLE PAE (R) TPOB POB Indicates Radial Bearing True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning c=:J Title TO State .LLLLJ Access Prohibited NOTES Coord1no'tes and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007 .00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al I distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. EXHIBIT G2 AREA APN 8, 703 SF 101-170-038 RIVERSIDE FREEWA y 9 R=3aoo.oo� --._ ----------..... -..... ..... .... ..... DOC. NO. 280866 O.R. CURVE TABLE C1 -~:;;;:02�21 '28" R=11899. 70' L=489.68' 22114-7 PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0 so 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: DATE: 09-18-14 REV.: 1; 11-11-14 �A: OF540 FA#: PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 17 " 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 " 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 " PSOMAS EXHIBIT 'Hl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22114-8 Temporary Construction Access Easement APN 101-170-038 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in those certain documents recorded January 4, 1991 as Document No. 005040 and July 21, 1993 as Do.cument No. 280866 both of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly comer of the land described in said Document No. 005040; thence North 57�49'26" West 28.81 feet along the southwesterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 32�09'13" East 151.38 feet parallel with southeasterly line of said lands of both documents referenced herein; thence North 57�50'4711 West 49.83 feet; thence South 57�30'43 11 West 28.83 feet; thence North 57�50'47" West 22.98 feet; thence North 57�30'43 11 East 44.32 feet; thence South 57�50'47 11 East 51.18 feet; thence North 32�09'13" East 26.14 feet parallel with southeasterly line of the lands described in said Document No. 280866; thence South 57�50'47" East 15.00 feet; thence North 32�09'13 11 East 140.80 feet paraJlel with last said southeasterly line; thence North 57�48'10" West 201.07 feet; thence North 78�53'55" West 125.38 feet; thence North 70�02'24" West 256.59 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 4177.01 feet, to which beginning a radial line bears South 17�34'54" West; thence westerly along said curve 76.98 feet through a central angle of 01�03'22"; thence North 20�57'27" East 22.02 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 4155.00 feet, to which beginning a radial line bears South 18�37'31" West; thence easterly along said curve 54.14 feet through a central angle of 00�44'48"; thence North 16�47'55" East 19.02 feet to a point on the general northerly line of the lands described in said Document No. 280866, said point also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 3800.00 feet, to which point P:\2PTGOI OS01\SURVEY\LEGALS\22114_APN_!0!-170-038\Lcgab\22114�8-TCAE.doc ll/10/2014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7 OF 21 19 Page 1 of2 PSOMAS a radial line bears South 17°46'14" West; thence easterly along said general northerly line 2 and along said curve 22.00 feet through a central angle of00°19'54"; thence South 3 16°47'55" West 22.00 feet; thence South 70°53'07" East 198.42 feet; thence South 4 77°37'3 l" East 178.86 feet; thence South 57°45'29" East 240.41 feet to a point on said s southeasterly line of the lands described in said Document No. 280866, said point being 6 distant South 32°09'13" West 30.50 feet from the most easterly corner of said lands; 7 thence South 32°09'13" West 356. 74 feet along said southeasterly line of said lands of 8 both documents referenced herein to the Point of Beginning. 9 10 Containing 28,445 square feet. II 12 See Exhibit 'H2• attached hereto and made a part hereof. 13 14 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 15 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 16 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 17 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 18 19 20 21 Prepared under the direction of 22 23 24 //-10~14 25 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 26 27 28 29 30 31 P:\2PTGOJ05(}1'SURVEY\LEOALS\22114_APN_IOl-170-038\Lcgals\22114-8-TCAE.d0<; I l/10fl014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8 OF 21 20 Page 2of2 " " " EXHIBIT H2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA 22114-B TCAE 28,445 SF .6==09�06'49" , 4.::,,030 Doc. ~, 's�s3 ,, LINE TABL~ Ll -N20�57'27"E L2 -N32�09'13"E L3 -N57�50'47"W L4 -S57�30'43"W L5 -N32�09'13"E L6 -S57�50'47"E L 7 -N32�09'13"E LB -N20�57'27"E L9 -N16�47'55"E L10-S16�47'55"W LEGEND (R) Indicates Radial Bearing POB Point of Beginning ~ Title to State ..LLL.LJ Access Prohibited NOTES R::::4177.01' R=4155.00' R=3800.00' APN 101-170-038 22114-8 Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al I distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTJON ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: DATE: 11-10-14 REV.: EA: OF 540 FA#: PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 " 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1.5 " 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 " PSOMAS EXHIBIT '11' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22114-9 Temporal? Building Access Easement APN 101-170-038 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 280866 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly comer of said land; thence South 32�09'13" West 195.71 feet along the southeasterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 57�50'47" West 28.81 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 57�50'47 11 West 29.69 feet; thence North 32�09'13" East 27.64 feet parallel with said southeasterly line; thence South 57�50'47 11 East29.69 feet; thence South 32�09'13" West 27.64 feet parallel with said southeasterly line to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 821 square feet. See Exhibit '12' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Grow1d distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0:999974 76. P:\2PTOOlOSOllSURVEY\LEOALS\221 14_ APN_ 101-170-038\Lcgals\22114-9-TBAE.doc 11/10/2014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10 OF 21 23 Page 1 of2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 PSOMAS Prepared under the direction of ~c:~~ J/-10-11 Brian E. Bullock. PLS 5260 Date P:\2PTGOI0501\SURVEY\LEOALSl22114_APN_IOl-170-0381Lclie!J\22114·9-TBAE.doc 11/1012014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 OF 21 24 Page 2 of2 " " " EXHIBIT 12 PARCEL# TITLE AREA APN 22114-9 TBAE 821 SF 101-170-038 165 ~ ,/ ROUTE 97 RIVERSIDE FREE WA y -- ---------------..... POR. CONCtPCION S~RRANO DE YORBA ALLOTMENT AND PDR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT .... DOC. NO. 280866 O.R " LINE TABLE L 1 -530�18'47"E L2 -N57� 49'26"W L3 -N20�57'27"E L4 -N61�05'19"W LEGEND 120.17' 158. 76' 24.55' 500.97' CURVE TABLE .... ... .... .... 6 ......... ..... ..... (R) TPOB POB Indicates Radial Bearing True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning C1 -6=02�21'28" R=11899.70 L=489.68' C=::J Tltle to State ..Ll.....LLI Acces$ Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bear nos ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Dlvide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al I distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. RADIAL TABLE R1 -S18�33'58"W R2 -S09�27'09"W 22114-9 TEMPORARY BUILDING ACCESS EASEMENT FEET 0 50 100 200 300 PREPARED SY: DATE: 11-10-14 REV.: EAi OF5'10 FA#: 9 PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 OF 21 25 3.2 2 EXHIBIT PARCEL# TITLE AREA 22114-9 TBAE 821 SF ...... .......... ....... ......... ......... ....... .......... ....... ......... ....... ......... POR. CONCEPCION SERRAND DE YDR8A ALLOIMENT AND POR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT DOC. NO. 280866 O.R. lJNE TABlE l1 -530°18'47"E 120.17' LS -N57°50'47"W 28.81, L6 -N57°50'47"W 29.69' L7 -N32°09'13"E 27.64' LB -S57°50'47"E 29.69' L9 -S32°09'13"W 27.64' (R) TPOB POB, Indicotes Radial Bearing True Point of BegTnning Point of Beginning c=:> Title to State ..L.LLLJ Acce$S Prohibited NOTES / ......... ......... / / / ......... ....... ......._/ ......... ......... 12 ....... ......... ......... .......... ......... .......... /;J ,.... Q -../ APN 101-170-038 ....... ,.. ;I 'I ......... ..J ' ".../.... ......... ' ....... ; I / / I / I I , I ........_ ~ I Q Ii -..J " CJ ~ lo-; ~ ~ &t):· cS' (J Ci 22114-9 cord notes and bear 1 ngs ore· on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.999~7476 to obtain 9round distances. All distances ore In feet unless otherwise noted. TEMPORARY BUILDING ACCESS EASEM£NT FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PRE.PARED BY: DATE: 11-10-H REV.: EA: OF540 FA#: PSO·MAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 2 2 26 " 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 " 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 " PSOMAS EXHIBIT 'Jl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22114-10 Temporary Demolition Construction Easement APN 101-170-038 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 280866 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly corner of said land; thence South 32�09'13" West 30.49 feet along the southeasterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 57�45'29" West 53.81 feet; thence North 32�09'13" East 20.00 feet parallel with said southeasterly line; thence South 57�45'29" East 25.00 feet; thence North 32�09'13" East 25.47 feet parallel with said southeasterly line to a point on the northeasterly line of said lands; thence South 30�18'47" East 32.49 feet along said northeasterly line to the Point of Beginning. Containing 1,594 square feet. See Exhibit '12' attached hereto and made a part hereof. The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:\2PTGO! OS01\SURVEY'1..EGAI.5\22l l 4_APN_I 01-170-038\Legals\22I14-1 Q.TDCE.doc 11/1012014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 OF 21 27 P81!c I of2 PSOMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 s 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1.5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 //-/()-14 Date P:\2PTGO I OSO llSUR VEY\LEOALS\221 l4_APN_IOl-170-038\Leg11b\22l l4-10-TDCE.doc 11/1012014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 OF 21 28 Pagc2 of2 " " " -c1 LlblE L1 - L2 - L3 - L4 - (R) POB EXHIBIT J2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA APN 22114-10 TOCE 1 ,594 SF 101-170-038 ........ , ct:J ~, ------------ 16!1 ROUTE -----------.... ______ _ w' : I t.01 lrlj ----------~ -,, U,1 vi o I <X>I 01 z, ----------- POR~ CONCEPCJON SERRANO DE YORBA ALLOTMENT AND POR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT SEE .... DOC. NO. 280866 O.R " IABLE 530�18'47"E 120.17' N57� 49'26"W 158.76' N20� 57'27"E 24.55' N61�05'19"W 500.97' LEGEND. CURVE TABLE .... Indicates Radial Bearing Point of Beginning C1 -l:..-=02�21 '28" R=11899. 70 8 L==489.68' ~ Title to State RADIAL TABLE ..LLLLJ Access Prohibited NOTES R1 -S18�33'58"W R2 ~ S09�27'09"W 22114-10 Coord notes and bearings are on ccs 1983( 2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al I distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. TEMPORARY DEMOLITION CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET o 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: DATE: 11-10-1~ REV.: EA: OF540 FA!*: 9 PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 2 29 EXHIBIT J2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA 22114-10 TOCE 1 ,594 SF EXISTING R/W ROUTE 91 RI VE RSI DE FREEWA y ------ ' ' ------' -.... ' ' ' ' ........ ' ' ' ' ' ' POR. GONCEPCJON SERRANO DE YORBA ALLOIMENI AND POR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT DOC. NO. 280866 O.R. LINE TABLE L5 -S32°09'13"W L6 -N57°45'29"W L 7 -N32°09'13"E LB -S57°45'29"E L9 -N32°09'13"E L10-530°18'47"E LEGEND 30.50' 53.81' 20.00' 25.00 1 25.47' 32.49' / ......... ' / ........ / ........ / ' (R) POB Indicates Radial Bearing Polnt of Beginning c=:J Title to Stote ..LJ.J.J...l Access Prohibited ' ' ' APN 101-170-038 NOTES 22114-10 Coord notes and beor1nga are on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al I distances ore in feet unless otherwise noted. TEMPORARY DEMOLITION CONSTRUCT/ON EASEMENT FEET 0 25 50 100 150 PREPARED BY: DATE I 11 -10-14 REV. r EAi OF5'40 fA#I PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOT AL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 2 2 30 " 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 " 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 " PSOMAS EXHIBIT 'Kl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Caltrans Parcel No. 22114-11 Temporary Construction Easement APN 101-170�038 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 280866 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly comer of said land; thence North 30�18'47" West 113.06 feet along the general northerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 4147.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 09�42'13" West; thence westerly along said curve 171.78 feet through a central angle of 02�22'24" to a point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said curve 128.14 feet through a central angle of 01�46'13" to a point, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 4136.30 feet, to which beginning a radial line bears South 16�34'35" West; thence along said curve 104.67 feet through a central angle ofOl 0 26'59" to a point on said general northerly line, said point being the . beginning of a non-tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 3,800.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 15�28'33" West; thence westerly along said general northerly line and along said cUtve 88.45 feet through a central angle of 01�20'01 11 to a point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 4121.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 19�44'07" West; thence easterly along said curve 154.24 feet through a central angle of02�08'40"; thence North 14�14'06" East 1.44 feet; thence South 75�47'56" East 79.02 feet; thence South 78�49'35 11 East 88.36 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 802 square feet. M:\2PTOO I 0501\SUR VEY\ LEG ALS\22114 _ APN _ l 01-170-03 8\Legals\22114-l I �TCE.dcc 11/1112014 EXHIBIT A. PAGE 16 OF 21 31 Page I of2 PSOMAS See Exhibit 'K2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 5 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 15~~ 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 11-11-14 Date M:\2PTOO 10S011.SURVEY\LEOALS\22114_APN _l 0 l-170-03811.egels\22114-11-TCE.doc l l/l lf2014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19 OF 21 32 Page2 of2 " " " EXHIBIT K2 PARCEL# TITLE AREA APN 22114-11 ........,, 0::1 -, w' ~ I lOI lilJ TCE 802 SF 165 .... __ 1 01 -1 70-038 B ---------..... .... ........ .... 'Loi vi o I COi OJ Z1 POR. CONCEPCION SERRANO DE YDR8A ALLOTMENT AND POR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT LINE TABLE L1 -S30�18'47"E L2 -N57� 49'26"W L3 -N20� 57'27"E L4 -N61�05'19"W L5 -N30�18'47"W LEGEND 120.17' 158.76' 24.55' 500.97' 113.06' (RJ TPOB POB Indicates Rodia I Bearing True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning C=:J Title to State ..LLLLJ Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and beor1ngs ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances end stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distCJnces. Al I distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. DOC. NO,. 280866 O.R " CURVE TABLE Cl -L'.=02�21'28" R=11899.70 C2 -ti=02�22'24" R=4147.00 RADIAL TABLE R1 -518�33'5B"W R2 -S09�27'09"W R3 -S09�42'13"W L=489.68' L=171.78' 22114-11 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET O 50 100 200 300 PREPARED BY: DATE: 11-11-14 REV.: Ht OF"540 FA#: 9 PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 2 33 EXHIBIT K2 - PARCEL# TITLE 22114-11 TCE ltiS ------ RADIAL TABLE R4 -S13°50'51"W (R=4147.00') R5 -516°34'35"W (R:::4136.30') R6 -518°01 '34"W (R=4136.30') R7 -S15°28'33"W (R::3800.00'} RB -516°48'34"W (R=3800.00') R9 -S19°44'07"W (R=4121.00'} R1 o~ S11°35'27"W CURVE TABLt AREA APN 802 SF 101-170-038 - 6 -P OPOSED R/W -------- PDR. CONCEPCJDN SERRANO DE YORBA ALLOTMENi AND POR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT C2 -a=02°22'24" R=414 7 .00 L=171.7B' DOC. NO. 280866 0.R. (R) TPOB POB c=J ..LLLL.1 LEGEND Indicates Rodiol Bearing True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access Prohibited NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007.00) Zon& 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al I distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. f'EET 0 LINE TABLE L6 -N14°14'06"E , .44 I 22114-11 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25 50 100 150 PREF'ARED BY: DATE: 11-11-14 REV.: EA: OF5'40 FA#Z ., - PSOMAS DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS B 3.2 2 2 34 Indian Wells (760) 568-2611 Irvine (949) 263-2600 Los Angeles (213) 617-8100 Ontario (909) 989-8584 IMlk BEST BEST & KRIEGER :i ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor, P.O. Box 1028, Riverside, CA 92502 Phone: (951) 686-1450 I Fax: (951) 686-3083 I www.bbklaw.com Sacramento (916) 325-4000 San Diego (619) 525-1300 Walnut Creek (925) 977-3300 Washington, DC (202) 785-0600 Margaret L. Barnes (951) 826-8357 margaret. barnes@bbklaw.com File No. 17336.02100 lo)~©~aw~rm lffi FEB O 6 2015 l!!J Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board February 6, 2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VIA HAND DELIVERY Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 Re: Notice of Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution of Necessity, as to Brewster, APN 101-170-010 (CPNs 22106-2); Dear Jennifer: Allsize Storage, APN 101-170-038 (CPNs 22114-7, 22114-8, 22114-9, 22114-10 and 22114-11) RCTC/SR91 CIP Project Attached are the original notices of Hearing to Property Owners, with proofs of mailing, of the hearing on March 11, 2015 for the adoption of amendments to previously-adopted resolutions of necessity, for additional right of way as to the parcels referenced above. These notices are being provided for your use in noting the date of mailing at the hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me, should have any questions. Very truly yours, Yl/f/<_,JA/u,t ~1 4.bt~k- Margaret L. Barnes Senior Litigation Paralegal for BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Attachments 17336.02100\9242464.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, March 11, 2015, at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider amending a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of real property interests in property that, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. The definition of the property rights to be acquired, together with the legal descriptions and corresponding depictions, are attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267 .2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\9218534.1 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3), your failure to file a written request with RCTC to appear and be heard within 15 days from the date that this Notice is mailed may result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above- stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: . PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: February ( 2015. 17336.02100\9218534.1 Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:30a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 Gregory G Snarr Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission. (The rights being acquired may be exercised mutually exclusive of each other.) "Drainage Easement" (as to CPN 22106-2) refers to a non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, and to its successors and assigns, to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend and maintain excavation, together with all rights necessary for incidentals thereto, on, over, under and across the Property, including the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush or other vegetation or flora, from time to time, as determined in its sole discretion, as described in the exhibit attached hereto and by reference made apart hereof, and with the following, and as set forth below: RCTC, its agents, employees, successors and assigns, shall have the right of ingress to and egress from the easement and right of way for the purpose of exercising the rights conveyed herein. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. 17336.02100\9547884. l EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 OF 4 2 3 PSOMAS EXHIBIT 'Bl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22106-2 5 Drainage Easement 6 APN 101-170-010 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in the Affidavit-Death of Trustee recorded April 19, 2007 as Document 1 o No. 2007-0264803 of Official Records of said County, being a strip ofland, 10.00 feet 11 wide, described as follows: 12 13 Beginning at the most easterly comer of said land; thence South 20°57'27" West 18.96 14 feet along the easterly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the beginning 15 of a non-tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 4,155.01 feet, to which 16 point a radial line bears South 18°37'3 l" West; thence westerly along said curve 309.58 17 feet through a central angle of 04°16'08"; thence North 67°06'21" West 360.02 feet to the 18 True Point of Beginning; thence South 67°06'21" East 10.00 feet; thence South 19 22°29'51"·West59.53 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northwesterly having a 20 radius of 95.00 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve 33.05 feet through a central 21 angle of 19°56'01" to a point on the general southwesterly line of said land; thence North 22 57°50'28" West 10.18 feet along last said line to a point thereon, said point being South 23 57°50'28" East 239.96 feet from the most westerly corner of said lands, said point also 24 being the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 25 85.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 46°20'41" East; thence northeasterly 26 along said curve 31.39 feet through a central angle of 21°09'28"; thence North 22°29'51" 27 East 59.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 28 29 Containing 918 square feet. 30 31 See Exhibit 'B2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. P:\2PTG010501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22106_APN_IOl-170-010\Legals\22106-2_DE.doc 11/1812014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 OF 4 Page 1 of2 PSOMAS The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 2 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 3 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 4 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 5 6 Prepared under the direction of 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~~ /l-19-14 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date P:\2PTGOI0501\SURVEY\LEGALS\22106_APN_IOl-170-010\Legals\22106-2_DE.doc 11/18/2014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 OF 4 Page2 of2 EXHIBIT B2 PARCE L:f:I: TITLE AREA APN 22106-2 DE 918 SO.FT. 101-170-010 ~ '~ '\ '\ '\ DOC. NO. , 2007-0264803 O.R. RADIAL TABLE R1 -N05°18'25"E R2 -N05° 37 '04"E R3 -N04°30'51"E R4 -S4 7° 34 '08"E R5 -S46°20'41"E LINE TABLE L 1 -567°06'21 "E L2 -N67°06'21"W L3 S22°29'51"W L4 -N57°50'28"W L5 -N22°29'51"E LEGEND '\~ ~ \>o '~ \~ 10.00' \ 82. 70' 59.53' ' 10.18' \ 59.60' TPOB Indicates True Point Of Beginning POB Indicates Point Of Beginning CURVE TABLE (R) Indicates Radial Bearing C:J Title to State .LLLL Access Prohibited C1 -R=95.00' L=33.05' 6.=19°56'01" C2 -R=85.00' L=31.39' 6.=21°09'28" NOTES Coordinates and bearings ore on CCS 1983(2007 .00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid distances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distances. Al I distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. PREPARED BY: DATE: 11 -1 8-14 FEET 0 REV.: 22106-2 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 60 120 240 EA: OF540 FA#: 360 PSOMAS SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 3 Hutt-on Centre Drive, Ste. 200 Santa Ano, California 92707 (714)481-8053/(714)545-8883 (Fox) 4 3.0 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on February _f_, 2015, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owners and other interested parties of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 101- 170-010 (CPNs 22106-2): Karen A. Brewster 212 Ironwood Drive, Suite D PMB 325 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 John M. Brewster, Sr. 212 Ironwood Drive, Suite D PMB 325 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Linda Day, Trustee, Successor Trustee c/o Stephen A. Scheck Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 LindaM. Day 1103 East Wilson A venue Orange, CA 92867 James Kroll, Trustee, Successor Trustee c/o Stephen A. Scheck Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 James W. Kroll 1103 East Wilson A venue Orange, CA 92867 Michael I. Kehoe, Esq. Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 17336.02100\9218534.1 Record Owner Record Owner Possible Interested Party Possible Interested Party Possible Interested Party Possible Interested Party Courtesy Copy Dated: February .i_, 2015. Margaret L. Barnes 17336.02100\9218534.1 NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that at a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, March 11, 2015, at 9:30 a.m., at the Riverside County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, the Commission of the Riverside County Transportation Commission intends to consider amending a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of real property interests in property that, according to the last equalized county assessment roll, is owned by you. The public use for which this resolution of necessity will be considered is for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project in Riverside County, California. The definition of the property rights to be acquired, together with the legal descriptions and corresponding depictions, are attached to this notice. A hearing will be held at the time and place mentioned above. You have the right to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is sought to be acquired. 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired by eminent domain and described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the proposed project. 4. Whether the offer required by Section 7267 .2 of the California Government Code has been made. 17336.02100\9218534.1 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235(b)(3), your failure to file a written request with RCTC to appear and be heard within 15 days from the date that this Notice is mailed may result in the waiver of your right to appear and be heard on the above- stated matters and issues that are the subject of the hearing. ALL COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 DATE OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: DATED: February c( 2015. 17336.02100\9218534.1 Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:30 a.m. Riverside County Administration Building Board of Supervisors Chambers 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 By: A Easter Gregory G Snarr Attorneys for Riverside County Transportation Commission Legal Definitions of Property to be Acquired The following is a list of definitions of legal rights to be acquired by Riverside County Transportation Commission. {The rights being acquired may be exercised mutually exclusive of each other.) "Permanent Access Easement" (CPN 22114-7) grants to RCTC, including its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive permanent and perpetual easement, to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way to access RCTC owned or public facilities, construction site, or right of way, as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, or plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC will not unreasonably withhold from Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to utilize the easement area for parking, driveway access, landscaping (exclusive of vertical penetration), open space and density or floor area calculation. RCTC shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time determined in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without obtaining the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. "Temporary Construction Access Easement" (CPN 22114-8) refers to a temporary easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, extend, maintain and traverse an access way as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior 17336.02100\9547966.1 EXHIBIT A. PAGE 1 OF 21 written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. The existing ground elevations upon completion of construction shall not be further increased or decreased without the prior written consent of RCTC. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 12 months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Temporary B.uilding Access Easement" (CPN 22114-9) refers to a non-exclusive temporary easement and right of way in favor of RCTC, its successors and assigns, together with the right to traverse and maintain an access way to access RCTC owned facilities and/or construction sites, as determined necessary by RCTC, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto, on, over, under, and across the property in connection with the exercise of any easement rights described herein. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation for the duration of the easement as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent ofRCTC, its successors and assigns. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm · to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\9547966.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 OF 21 "Temporary Demolition Construction Easement" (CPN 22114-10) refers to an exclusive temporary easement and right of way in favor ofRCTC, its successors and assigns, for the purpose of demolition, construction, reconstruction, and repair of the building and improvements located therein, together with all necessary rights incidental thereto. Property Owner shall not erect or construct, or permit to be· erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over, or under any portion of the easement, or plant trees or any other vegetation on any portion of the easement except with the prior written consent of RCTC, its successors and assigns. RCTC shall have the right to trim, cut or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation from time to time as determined in its sole discretion, without payment of additional compensation. No other easements shall· be granted on, under or over the easement without the prior written consent ofRCTC, its successors and assigns. Such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. "Temporary Construction Easement (TCE)" (CPN 22114-11) refers to the right of RCTC, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project. With respect to CPN 22114-11, such right shall be exercised for a period of 6 consecutive months, beginning no fewer than 72 hours after the date that RCTC provides written notice of commencement of possession to the property owner. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not extend beyond November 6, 2017, or upon filing of a Notice of Completion, whichever is earlier. Property Owner shall not cause, directly, indirectly or negligently, any interference with or harm to the rights conveyed hereunder. 17336.02100\9547966.1 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 OF 21 2 3 PSOMAS EXlllBIT 'Gl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22114-7 s Permanent Access Easement 6 APN 101·170~038 7 8 In the City of Corona. County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in those certain documents recorded January 4, 1991 as Document No. 1 o 005040 and July 21, 1993 as Document No. 280866 both of Official Records of said 11 County, described as follows: 12 13 Beginning at the most southerly comer of the lands described in said Document No. 14 005040; thence North 57°49'26" West 5.00' feet along the southwesterly line of said lands 15 to a. point thereon, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 57°49'26" 16 West 22.00 feet continuing along said southwesterly line to a point thereon; thence North 17 32°09'13" East 401.30 feet along a line parallel with and 27.00 feet northwesterly of the 18 southeasterly line of said lands of both documents referenced herein to a point on the 19 northeasterly line of the lands described in said Document No. 280866; thence South 20 30°18'47" East 24.81 feet along said northeasterly line to a point thereon; thence South 21 32°09'13'' West 389.84 feet along a line parallel with and 5.00 feet northwesterly of the 22 aforesaid southeasterly line to the True Point of Beginning. 23 24 Containing 8, 703 square feet. 25 26 See Exhibit '02' attached hereto and made a part hereo£ 27 28 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 29 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 30 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being descn'bed. The mean 31 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. P:\2PTGOIOSOl'SURVEY\LEGAIS\22114_APN_ l01-170-038\Legals\221 l4-7-P AE .doc ll/ll/2014 EXHIBIT A. PAGE 4 OF 21 Pagel of2 PSOMAS 2 3 Prepared under the direction of 4 :~~ 7 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 29 30 ' 31 IJ .. IJ-1# Date. P:\2PTGOIOSOI\SUR.VEY\LEOALS\22114_APN_101-170-038\Legals\22114-7-PAE .doc ll/1112014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 OF 21 Page2 of2 PARCEL# 22114-7 ~~~~f5B"W ( 3 --...... RJ -.., I I I TITLE PAE EXHIBIT G2 AREA APN 8, 703 SF 101-170-038 6 I I I I A=09°06 '49" R=3aoo.oo· LIN~ TABLE L 1 -N20°57'27''E {R) TPOB POB c:::J I II I I LEGEND Indicates Radial Beor-lng True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Access. Prohlt>lted NOTES oord1notea on bear ngs are on CCS 1903(2007 .OO) Zone 6. Distances .ond stationing ore grid diStances, ·Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain ground distoriees. At I distances ore In feet unless otherwise noted. DOC. NO. 2808S6 O.R. CURV.E TABLt C1 -A-=02°21 '28" R=11899. 70' L=489.68' 22114-7 PERMANtNr ACCESS EASEMENT rEET 0 so 100 200 300 DATE: 09-18-14 REV.: 1111-11-1111 £A: OF540 FA•t DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 1 2 3 PSOMAS EXHIBIT 'Hl' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22114:8 s Temporary Construction Access Easement 6 APN 101-170-038 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in those certain documents recorded January 4, 1991 as Document No. IO 005040 and July 21, 1993 as D~ument No. 280866 both of Official Records of said 11 County, described as follows: 12 13 Beginning at the most southerly comer of the land described in said Document No. 14 005040; thence North 57°49'26" West 28.81 feet along the southwesterly line of said land 15 to a point thereon; thence North.32°09'13" East 151.38 feet parallel with southeasterly 16 line of said lands of both documents referenced herein; thence North 57°50'47 11 West 17 49.83 feet; thence South 57°30'43" West 28.83 feet; thence North 57°50'47" West 22.98 18 feet; thence North 57°30'43" East 44.32 feet; thence South 57°50'47" East 51.18 feet; 19 thence North 32°09'13" East 26.14 feet parallel with southeasterly line of the lands 20 described in said Docwnent No. 280866; thence South 57°50'47 11 East 15.00 feet; thence 21 North 32°09'13" East 140.80 feet parallel with last said southeasterly line; thence North 22 57°48'10" West 201.07 feet; thence North 78°53'55" West 125.38 feet; thence North 23 70°02'24" West 256.59 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, 24 having a radius of 4177.01 feet, to which beginning a radial line bears South 17°34'54" 25 West; thence westerly along said curve 76.98 feet through a central angle of 01°03'22"; 26 thence North 20°57'27" East 22.02 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent cwve, concave 27 northerly, having a radius of 4155.00 feet, to which beginning a radial line bears South 28 18°3131 i• West; thence easterly along said curve 54.14 feet through a central angle of 29 00°44'48"; thence North 16°47'55" East 19.02 feet to a point on the general northerly line 30 of the lands described in said Document No. 280866, said point also being the beginning 31 of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 3800.00 feet, to which point P:\2PT0010S01\SURVEY\LEOALS\22114_APN_l01-l70.038\Lcgals\22114-8-TCAE.doc ll/10ll014 EXHIBIT A. PAGE 7 OF 21 Pagclof2 PSOMAS 1 a radial line bears South 17°46'14" West; thence easterly along said general northerly line 2 and along said curve 22.00 feet through a central angle of 00°19'54"; thence South 3 · 16°47155" West 22.00 feet; thence South 70°53'07" East 198.42 feet; thence South 4 77°37'31" East 178.86 feet; thence South 57°45'29" East 240.41 feet to a point on said s southeasterly line of the lands described in said Document No. 280866, said point being 6 distant South 32°09'13" \Vest 30.50 feet from the most easterly corner of said lands; 7 thence South 32°09'13" West356.74 feet along said southeasterly line of said lands of 8 both documents referenced herein to the Point of Beginning. · 9 10 Containing 28,445 square feet. II 12 See Exhibit 'H2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 13 14 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 15 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 16 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 17 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 18 19 20 21 Prepared under the direction of 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 $;~ //-10-14 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date P:\2PTOOIOSOl~URVEY\LEG~l 14_APN_l01 ·170-0311\Lcgals\22114-8-TCAE.d~ llfl0fl014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE I OF 21 Page2of2 PARCEL# TITLE 22114-8 TCAE CURVE TABLE_ C1 -6~02°21 '28" C2 -A=01°03'22" C3 -A=00 6 4'4'48" C4 -A=00°19'54" __ 1v610 sooos. , .a~OJ [). Oc ............... ol. ". • .............. ~ S S.:J•• LINE TA6b~ L 1 -N20° 57'27"E L2 -N32°09'13"E L3 -N57° 50'47"W L4 -S57°30'43"W L5 -N32°09'13"!: LG -S57°50'41"E L 7 -N32°09't3"E LB -N20° 57'27"E L9 -N16°47'55"E: L10-S16°47'551'W (R) POB c::::J IL I 1 I LEGEND ll'ldicotes Aodial Bearing Point of Beginning Title to State Accesa Prohibited NOtES Coordinates end bearings ore on ccs 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Distances and stationing ore grid dlatonce&. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtoln ground distances. Al I distances ore In feet unless ot~erwls~ noted. EXHIBIT H2 AREA APN 28,445 SF' 101-170-038 125.38' N78°53'5511 w R=11899.70' L=489.68' R=4177.01' R=4155.00' 22114-8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS EASCMENT F'EET 0 50 100 200 300 EA: OF5"10 FA#: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEEtS 8 RIV 91 3.2 1 2 3 PSOMAS EXHIBIT '11' LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans Parcel No. 22114-9 s Temporaiy Building Access Easement 6 APN 101-170-038 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 10 280866 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the most easterly comer of said land; thence South 32°09'13" West 195.71 13 feet along the southeasterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 57°50'47" 14 West 28.81 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 57°50147 11 · IS West 29.69 feet; thence North 32°09113 11 East 27.64 feet parallel with said southeasterly 16 line; thence South 57°50'47 11 East29.69 feet; thence South 32°09'13" West 27.64 feet 17 parallel with said southeasterly line to the True Point of Beginning. 18 19 Containing 821 square feet. 20 21 See Exhibit '12' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 22 23 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 24 System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007.00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing 2S grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 26 combination factor for this conversion is 0;999974 76. 27 28 29 30 31 P:\2PT0010S011SURVEY\LEOALS\22114_APN_l01-170-038\Legals\22114-9-TBAE.doc 11/10/l014 EXHIBIT A. PAGE 10 OF 21 Page 1 of2 PSOMAS 1 Prepared under the direction of '.2 :df:.~· S Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 //-10-11 Date P:\2PTOOlOS01\SURVEY\LEOALS\22114_APN_101-l 70-038\Le&als\221 l4-9·TBAE.doc 11/10/2(114 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11 OF 21 Page2of2 EXHIBIT 12 PARCEL# TITLE AREA 22114-9 TBAE 821 SF 165 ROUTE POR. CONCEPCION SERRAND DE YORBA ALL01MENT ANO PDR~ TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT LINE TABLE L1 -S30°18;47"E L2 ... N57° 49'2G''W L3 -N20° 57'27"E L4 -N61°05'1911 W LEGEND 120.17' 158. 76' 24 .55' 500.97' DOC. NO. 280866 O.R. CURVE: TABLE APN 101-170-038 I I I / I I • (R) TPOB POB Indicates Rodial Bearing True Point of Beginning Point of Beginning C1 -A=02° 21 '2811 R=11899. 70 L=4B9.68 I c=J Tltle to State t II II Access Prohibit.a NOTES oord nctes ana beat not ore on C:CS 1983(2007.00) Zone t;, Distances oM. atotiontng are grid dtatances. Divide by 0.99997476 to obtain Qround distances. All distances ore tn feet unless otherwise noted. RADIAL TABLE. R1 .. S18°33'58"W R2 -S09°27'09"W 22114-9 TEMPORARY BUILDING ACCESS tASEMtNT t££T 0 50 100 200 JOO OATE: 11•10•14 REV.t [Al OF540 fA•: DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEEt PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 91 3.2 1 2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12 OF 21 EXHIBIT PARCELti: TITLE AREA 22114 ... 9 TBAE 821 SF ..... ........ ........ ......... ........ ....... ....... ........ ......... ........ ....... POR. CONCEPCION SERRANO DE YORBA ALL01ME:N~r ANO POR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT 12 APN 101-170-038 ....... ........ ' ...... I ....... ,.. ....... '..J I ......... ....... ...........~ ', I' ....... '-I I I I I I DOC. NO, 280866 O.R. 22114-9 I I I I J...lt:Ji tABLE L1 -S30°1B'47"E LS -NS7°50'47"W L6 -N51 6 50'47"W L 7 -N32°09'13°t. LB -S57°50'47"E L9 -S32°09'13"W 120.17' 2&.81 ; 29.69' 27 .64 I 29.69' 27.64' oos 010 i----~--------~~~---. 0.R LEGEND · (RI TPOB POI, c::=:) 41 I t I In<tica.tea RadlOI Bearing 1roe Point of Beginning Point of Beginning Title to State Ac:ceaa Prohibited NOTES oor no es ond bear 1 nos are on ccs 1983(200? .OOJ Zone 6. Olatonces ot'ld stofi()ning ore grid distances. Divide t>y 0,99~~H76 to oMOin wround dl$toncea. All ~iatancH ore In #eet unleH o.therw18t notec2. PREPARED ev1 FEET 0 / 22114-9 TEMPORARY BUILDING ACCESS EASEMENT 2$ !SO 100 150 PSO·MAS DISTRICT COUNTY AOUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO •. TOTAL SHEETS J HuttGll Centte Dr,ve1 Stte' 200 laft~ll. Al'l<I Callfal"n 11 d: C>7· (7UJ7S1•1JTJ/(714)545•18B3 (Fox) . a RIV 91 3.2 2 2 2 3 PSOMAS EJlUBIT 'Jl' LEGAL J)ESCRIPTION 4 Caltrans P_atcelNo. 22114-JO s 1emporaty Demolition Copstruction Euewent 6 APN 101-170·038 7 s In the City or Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the 9 land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No.· 10 280866 of Official Records of said County; described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the most easterly comer of said land; thence South 32°()9t13" West 30.49 13 feet along the southeasterly line of said land to a point thereon; thence North 57°4S'29" 14 West 53.81 feet; thence North 32°09'13" East 20.00 feet parallel with said southeasterly ts line; thence Sou:th 57°45'29'1 East 25.00 feet; thence North 32°09'13" East 25.41 feet 16 ~allel with said southeasterly line to a point on the northeasterly line of said lands; 17 thence South 30°18'47'' East 32.49 feet along said northeasterly line to the Point ot UJ Beginning. 19 20 Containing 1,594 square feet. 21 22 See Exhibit 'J2 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof. 23 24 The distahces described herein are grid distances and arc based on California Coordinate 2s System of 1983, Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distanceS may be obtained by dividing 26 grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 27 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 28 29 30 31 l>:\2l'TG010SOl\SURVEY\LEOAL5\22ll4_Al>l•UOl·l10--038\tepls\22114·10-TDCE.doc 11/10/2014 EXHIBIT A. PAGE 14 OF 21 .Pap J ofl PSOMAS 2 Prepared under the direction of 3 4 s /l-llJ-14 6 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 Date 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 1.5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 P:\2PTGOIOS011SURVEY\LEOALS\22114_APN_l01-170-038\Legals\22114-10-TDCE.doc 11/10/2014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15 OF 21 Page2of2 EXHIBIT J2 PARCEL# ilTLE AREA 22114•10 TOCE 1 ,594 SF f6$ ...., '9 ROUT£ 97 4=0900~; 0 49" POR~ OONC~PCJON SERRANO DE YORBA ALLOiMENT AND PDR~ TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT APt-t 101 ... 170-038 8 DOC. NO. 280866 O.R. LINE .TABLE L1 ... S30°18'47"E L2 ~ N57° 49t26"W L3 -N20° 57'27"E: L4 -NG1°05'19"W LEGEND 120.17' 158.76' 24 .55' 500.97' (R) POB Indicates Radial &earing Point of Beginning ~ Title to Stat• I I I l I Access Prohibited NOTES Coord notes on beor ngs ore on ccs t 98:5(2007.00) Zone 6. DiatoncH ond ato+toning or'e grid dlatoncea. Divide by 0.999974176 to obtain ground dlatoncea. All dlstcinces .are In feet un1eH otMrwlH noted. lliRE:PAftEO BVt CURY~ TABLE C1 -A=02°21 '2B'' R=11899. 70 L:=489.G8' ftADlAL TABLE R1 -S 18° 3~.'58"W R2 -so9° 21·09"w 22114-10 TEMPORARY DEMOLITION CONSTRUCtlON EASEMENT f!U:t 0 50 100 200 300 [A: OF'540 F'A•t PSOMAS ' . Hutton C11nt.-• D~lva6 Ste. 200 anta MG Cal!fornta 27 f 714)751 •1JU/(l14l!MS•a~l (Fox) DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 RIV 3.2 2 EXHIBIT J2 PARCEL~ TITLE AREA APN 22t14 ... 10 TOCE 1 ,594 SF" 101-170-038 EXISTING R/W ROUTE 91 RJV£RS1DE FREEWAY ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ' POR. CONCEPCION SERRAND DE YORSA ALL01MENi AND POR. TOMAS YORBA ALLO'TMEtrr DOC. NO. 280866 O.R. LlNE.fABLE LS -S32°09'13"W L6 -N57°45'2911 W L 7 -N32°09'2 3''E L8 -S57° 45'29"E L9 ~ N'.52°09'1 l"E L 10-530°18'47"E LEGEND 30. 50' 53.81' 20.00' 25.00' 2S.47' 32.49' / ................ , / ......... / ........ / (R) POB lndlcotes RQdlal eeor-ing Potnt of eegtnnlng Title to State Access Prohibited c:::> I II I I NOTES ........ ........ ........ 22114-10 oor nc:it•s on be.or ngs c:ire on CC$ 1983(2007 .00} ?one 6 •. Distances ona $tOtl<:>nlng cir& grla dl$tonces. Divide by O.t9997~76 to obtain ground dlstance,s. Ail distc;in~es ore fn feet un11ss otMrwlH t1oted. TEMPORARY DEMO(..JTION CONStlWCTION EASEMENT PREPAfitEO BYt PSOMAS ~Hufton Centre DrjV•t S1'.il• zoo nta Ana CQl!fol'n o 92707 . 14)751-~lfJ/(114)5(!-:eau (Fdx) FEU 0 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 8 so 10() 1!10 £At OFS40 F'A•s SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SH£ET 3.2 2 2 -., 1 2 3 PSOMAS EXHIBIT ~K:tt LEGAL DESCBJPTION 4 <;;altranm Parcel No. 22114'.'ll s Temporary Construction Easement 6 APN 101-170-038 7 8 In the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion ofthe 9 land described in that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 1 o 280866 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: 11 12 Beginning at the most easterly comer of said land; thence North 30°18'47" West 113.06 13 feet along the general northerly line of said land to a point thereon, said point being the 14 beginning of a non·tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 4147.00 feet, to IS which point a radial line bears South 09°42'13" West: thence westerly along said curve 16 171.78 feet through a central angle of 02°22'24" to a point thercoll; said point being the 17 True Point of B~gbudng; thence continuing along said curve 128.14 feet through a 18 central angle of ()1°46'13" to a point, said point being the beginning of a nc>n-tangent 19 curve. collCaYe northerly, having a radius of 4136.30 feet, to which beginning a radial 20 line bears South 16°34'35" West: thence along said curve 104.67 feet through a central 21 angle of01°26'S9" to a point on said general northerly line, said point being the 22 . beginning of a non·tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 3 ,800.00 feet, to 23 which point a radial line bears South 15°28'33" West; thence westerly along said general 24 northerly line and along said curve 88.45 feet through a central angle of 01°20'01" to a 2$ point thereon, said point being the beginning of a non· tangent curve, concave northerly, 26 having a radius of 4121.00 feet, to which point a radial line bears South 19°44'07 11 West;· 21 thence easterly along said curve 154.24 feet through a central angle of02°08'40"; thence 28 North 14°14'06" East 1.44 feet; thence South 75°47'56" East 79.02 feet; thence South 29 18°49'35;, East 88.36 feet to the Point of Beginning. 30 31 Containing 802 square feet. M:\2PTG010S01\SURVEY\Ll::OALS\22114_APN~I 01· 170.038\Leaab\22114-l l •TCE.doc 1111112014 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 OF 21 Pqe lofl PSOMAS See ~bit 'K.2' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 3 The distances described herein are grid distances and are based on California Coordinate 4 System of 1983. Zone 6, 2007 .00 epoch. Ground distances may be obtained by dividing s grid distances by the mean combination factor of the courses being described. The mean 6 combination factor for this conversion is 0.99997476. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Prepared under the direction of 13 14 " ~~ 16 Brian E. Bullock, PLS 5260 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 //,//-14= Date M:\2PTOOlOSOI \SURVEY\LEOALS\22114_APN_101-110-038\Legals\22114~11-TCE.doc l l/l ltl014 EXHIBIT A. PAGE 19 OF 21 Page2of2 -------------------------------------------- PARCEL# TITLE 22114-11 TC£ EXHIBIT Kl 165 AREA 802 s~ ....... ------------, APN 101-170-038 8 PDR~ CONDEPDlON SERRANO DE YDRSA ALLOTMgNT AND POR. TOMAS YORSA ALLOTMENT LINE TABLE L 1 -530°18'47"E L2 -N51° '49'26"W L3 -N20°57'2rE L4 -N61°05'19"W LS -N30° l S' 4 rw LEGE NO 120.17' 158. 76' 24.55' 500.97' 113 .. 06' (R) TPOB POB tncilcatea Radicil Bearing True Point of eegtnning Polt'lt of Beginning c:::::> Title to Stat• I t II A Access Prol'llbfted NOTES oord ndtea and beor nos are on CC$ 1983(2007.00) Zone 6. Olatoncea and stotlol'llng ore grid dlatancts. Divide by (M1~997476 to obtain ground diltc:lncH .• Alt dlatol'IC:es C)r-e in feet unless otherwlH not•ch DOC. NO .• 280866 O.R. CUBYE TABLE C1 -t.=02°21 '28" R=11899. 70 L=-489,68' C2 -A=02°2~'24'' R=4141.00 L=l71.78' RADIAL. TABLE R 1 -s 1 8 ° 3 3 I 5 B "W R2 -S09°27'09"W R3 -S09° 42'1311 W 22114 .. 11 T(MPORARY CONSTRUCTION £AS£M£Nt f"EET o so 100 200 OATE111·11·1"1 ftEv.: 300 DISiRIC"t COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM :SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 8 3.2 1 2 EXHIBIT Kl PARCEL# TITLE 22114-11 TCE 165 BADIAL TABLE R4 -S13 111 50'51"W (R~4147.00') RS -S16°34'35"W (fl*=4136.30') RG -S18°01 '34''W (R::4136.30') R7 -515°2S'33"W (R.::3800.00') R8 -Sl6°48'34"W (R=3800.00') R9 ~ Sl9°44'07''W (flz412LOO') Rl o-S 17°35'27"W CUBYE tABLE AREA APN 802.SF 101-170 .. 038 R POSED R/W --..._ __ , PDR 4 CONOEPC JON SERRANO. Dt YORBA ALLOTMENT AND PDR. TOMAS YORBA ALLOTMEN1 C2 -&=02°22'24" R=4147.00 L=171.78' DOC. NO. 280866 O.R. CRJ TPOB PCB ~ I I J IJ LEGE: NO ltldlcotH Rodiol Bearing iru~ Point of Beginning Point of Beginning 'tltfe to State ACC6$$ Pro~lblted NOTES oord note• and ~ear ng• are on CC$ 1983(2007.00} 2on• 6. Pistonces and atationlng ore grld distances. Olvtd• by 0.99!697-476 to obtoln orot.1M aietonces. Al I dfstonoea ore In feet unless otl'*rwlst nott~. LINE TABLt L6 -N14°14'06°E 1 .44' 22114-11 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FEET 0 25 100 PRtPAR£D evz DAT£: 1 t•11-1"1 REV.I 150 PSOMAS , Hutton C•ntre Drjv•1 lfe. 200 antQ Ano. COi lfOr"rl a 1!107 714J1S1 ·=IJ7~1(71<t)$4S4U3 (tox) DISIRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEE.T NO. TOT AL SHEETS 0 RlV 91 3.2 2 2 PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE I, Margaret L. Barnes, acting on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereby certify that on February .k_, 2015, I mailed a copy of the attached notice by first-class mail to the following owners and other interested parties of real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel No. 101- 170-038 (CPNs 22114-7, 22114-8, 22114-9, 22114-10 and 22114-11): Allsize Storage Corona 2785 Garden River Corona, CA 92880 Allsize Storage Corona c/o John M. Brewster, Managing General Partner 4071 Second Street Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Allsize Storage Corona c/o Richard W. Millar, Jr. Millar, Hodges, Bemis & Mozingo One Newport Place, Suite 900 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Allsize Storage Corona 2785 Palisades Drive Corona, CA 92880 Allsize Storage Corona, Inc. 1301 Dove Street, Suite 900 Newport Beach, CA 92660 ReadyCap Commercial, LLC Attn. Post Closing 114 Pacifica, Suite 400 Irvine, CA 92618 Michael P. Cutler, Esq. Polsinelli, LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2300 Los Angeles, CA 90067 17336.02100\9218534.1 Record Owner Record Owner Record Owner Record Owner Record Owner Possible Interested Party Courtesy Copy Michael I. Kehoe, Esq. Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP 2603 Main Street, Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92614 Dated: February J;, 2015. 17336.02100\9218534. l Courtesy Copy argaret L. Barnes " " PALMIERI. TYLER WIENER, WILHELM & WALDRON~ ANGELO J. PALMIERI (1926-1996) ROBERT F. WALDRON (1927-1998) MICHAEL J. GREENE" RYAN M. EASTER DENNIS W. GHAW ELISE M. KERN DAVID D. PARR" MELISA R. PEREZ CHARLES H. KANTER" MICHAEL I. KEHOE PATRICK A. HENNESSEY CHADWICK C. BUNCH DON FISHER GREGORY N. WEILER WARREN A. WILLIAMS JOHN R. LISTER MICHAEL H. LEIFER SCOTT R. CARPENTER RICHARD A. SALUS NORMAN J. RODICH RONALD M. COLE MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO STEPHEN A. SCHECK DONNA L. SNOW ANISH J. BANKER RYAN M. PRAGER ERIN BALSARA NADERI ERICA M. SOROSKY JERAD BELTZ CANDICE L. LEE MICHAEL P. BURNS JOSHUA J. MARX ERIN K. OYAMA STEVEN R. GUESS KATHERINE M. HARRISON BRIAN GLICKLIN ALAN H. WIENER', OF COUNSEL ROBERT C. IHRKE, OF COUNSEL MICHAEL C. CHO, OF COUNSEL JAMES E. WILHELM, RETIRED DENNIS G. TYLER", RETIRED "A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL Jennifer Harmon 2603 MAIN STREET EAST TOWER -SUITE 1300 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-4281 (949) 851-9400 www.ptwww.com February 11, 2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: Intent to Appear at Resolution of Necessity Hearing J~\ I Tl? I t--1 P.O. BOX 19712 IRVINE, CA 92623-9712 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (949) 851-7279 WRITER'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBER (949) 825-5453 FIRM'S DIRECT FACSIMILE NUMBERS (949) 851-1554 (949) 757-1225 mkehoe@ptwww.com REFER TO FILE NO. 37385-000 Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22114-1, 22114-2, 22114-3, 22114-4, 22114-5, and 22114-6; 22106-1 Dear Ms. Harmon: Vie represent John .M. Brewster, Sr., Karen A. Brewster, and Allsize Storage Corona, Inc. in the above-referenced matter. Pursuant t~ the Notice of Hearing To Consider Amendment of the Resolution ofNecessity, scheduled for March 11, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. before the Riverside County Transportation Commission, please be advised that we intend to appear and be heard at the hearing regarding amending the Resolution of Necessity. 1427292.l PALMIERI, TYLER. WIENER. WILHELM & WALDRON ::1 Jennifer Harmon February 11, 2015 Page2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. MK:sh cc: Client 1427292.1 THE COMMISSION IS REQUESTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. 3/11/2015 1 3/11/2015 1. Allsize Storage Corona, Inc. No. Ownership Offer Date 1 Allsize Storaqe Corona, Inc. December 10. 2014 2 3/11/2015 PARCEL 1 3 Building Demolition Easement 1,594 SF -Building Access Easement 821 SF -Permanent Access Easement 8,703 SF -Temporary Construction/Access Easement 28,445 SF -Temporary Construction Easement 802 SF Fee Acquisition 2,735 SF Building Demolition Easement 1,594 SF Building Access Easement 821 SF Permanent Access Easement 8,703 SF Temporary Construction/ Access Easement 28,445 SF Temporary Construction Easement 802 SF 3/11/2015 4 THE COMMISSION ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and 4. The offer of just compensation has been made to the property owner. 3/11/2015 5 " " " ; :� " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2014/15 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve a net increase of $885,000 in Fiscal Year 2014/15 expenditures for mid-year budget adjustments. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Staff performed a review of expenditures for the six months ended December 31, 2014, and an estimate of expenditures for the remaining six months of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. As a result of the review, the following mid-year budget adjustments are proposed: Expenditure Adjustment 1 -$100,000 The original FY 2014/15 budget did not include sufficient insurance budget authority for the State Route 91 and Perris Valley Line (PVL) projects. An adjustment of $100,000 is needed to increase the insurance budget authority to insure numerous SR-91 property acquisitions and support on the PVL projects. There are sufficient General Fund funds available to accommodate this budget adjustment. Expenditure Adjustment 2 -$150,000 The original FY 2014/15 budget includes $30,000 for technology upgrades, which has been consumed for network equipment improvements. Technology upgrades to the Commission's conference rooms are being planned and may include large computer screens, audio, complete wiring of conference room table, relocation of existing conference room white board, Rich Site Summary (RSS) feed, presentation/collaboration appliances, video conference, and tablet connectivity. Therefore, staff recommends a $150,000 budget increase in the General Fund expenditures . Agenda Item 8A 35 Expenditure Adjustment 3 -$125,000 The original FY 2014/15 budget did not include sufficient property management and right of way support budget authority for weed abatement and utility services along the PVL and rail crossing repair work needed in the city of Hemet and at the Pedley Station. Adequate 1989 Measure A Western Riverside County rail fund balance is available to accommodate this budget adjustment to increase weed abatement, utilities, and right of way support expenditures by $75,000, $10,000, and $50,000 respectively. Expenditure Adjustment 4 -$500.000 The original FY 2014/15 budget did not include budget authority for project and construction management (PCM) services for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project. Staff is finalizing the PCM agreement and plans to seek Commission approval in April 2015. The PCM will have two months of PCM work for FY 2014/15. Adequate 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County highway fund balance is available to accommodate this budget adjustment to increase design build expenditures by $500,000. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: I No I Year: I FY 2014/15 Amount: I $885,000 Source of Funds: I General Fund, 2009 Measure A Western County Rail Funds Budget Adjustment: I Yes 001001 73401 000110119 73002 $100,000 001001 90101 000110112 90101 $150,000 GL/Project Accounting No.: 332402 73313 0000 221 33 73301 $75,000 332402 73003 0000 221 33 73003 $10,000 332402 81403 0000 221 33 81402 $50,000 003027 81601 0000 262 3181601 $500,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: ~~ I Date: I 02/11/15 Agenda Item 8A 36 • • • " " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2014. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the first six months of the fiscal year, staff monitored the revenues and expenditures of the Commission. The attached financial statements present the revenues and expenditures for the first six months of the fiscal year. Period closing accrual adjustments are not included for revenues earned but not billed and expenditures incurred for goods and services received but not yet invoiced, as such adjustments are normally made during the year-end closing activities. The operating statement shows the sales tax revenues for the second quarter at 30 percent of the budget. This is a result of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 33. GASB 33 requires sales tax revenues to be accrued for the period in which it is collected at the point of sale. The State Board of Equalization collects the Measure A funds and remits these funds to the Commission after the reporting period for the businesses. This creates a two-month lag in the receipt of revenues by the Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements reflect the revenues related to collections through October 2014. On a cash basis, the Measure A and Local Transportation Fund (LTF) sales tax revenues are 5.67 percent and 7.82 percent higher, respectively, than the same period last fiscal year. At the January 14 Commission meeting, staff presented the revised FY 2014/15 revenue projections and staff recommended the Commission maintain the current year revenue projections for Measure A and LTF revenues of $167 million and $81.5 million, respectively. State Transit Assistance Fund initial receipts of $2.9 million for FY 2014/15 were received in November 2014. Staff will continue to monitor the trends in the sales tax receipts and report to the Commission any necessary adjustments . Agenda Item SB 37 Federal, state, and local revenues are on a reimbursement basis. The Commission will receive these revenues as eligible project costs are incurred and invoiced to the respective agencies. Significant federal and state reimbursements to date are related to the Perris Valley Line (PVL) and Interstate 215 corridor improvement projects. During the FY 2014/15 budget process, the Commission took a conservative approach to estimate the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of $8 million passed through from the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). At the January 14 Commission meeting, staff presented the revised FY 2014/15 revenue projections and increased the TUMF revenues to $12 million, which will be reflected in the third quarter financial statements. The Commission received TUMF receipts through October 2014. The budgeted balance of $154,600 relates to TUMF zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange project. Staff will invoice WRCOG for TUMF zone reimbursements as eligible expenditures are incurred through the third quarter. Other revenues include property management revenues generated from properties acquired in connection with the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) and various rail properties. Interest income is higher in the second quarter as a result of the investment earnings in connection with the 2013 sales tax revenue bond and 2013 toll revenue bond proceeds, and • the conservative approach the Commission took in estimating investment income. • The expenditure and other financing source/use categories are in line overall with the expectations of the budget for the second quarter with the following exceptions or noted matters: • · Salaries and benefits are slightly over as a result of the prepayment of the FY 2014/15 employer retirement contribution, which provides a discount of one-half of the year's interest; • Professional services expenditures are under budget due to unused budget authority for rail and station development planning, financial advisory management, and various projects' legal services. Staff anticipates using more budget authority by the fourth quarter; • Support costs are under budget due to unused budget authority for the marketing of new rail service and rail safety advertisements, rail operations and station maintenance, and motorist assistance call box upgrades. Staff anticipates using more budget authority by the fourth quarter; • Program operations are under budget due to unused budget authority for SR-91 CIP permit activities and Freeway Service Patrol, Motorist and Commuter Assistance Program operations, and Rail Program management and operations related to the Perris Valley Line. Staff anticipates using most of the budget authority by the four~ quarter; Agenda Item 8B 38 • " " " " Engineering, construction, design-build, and right of way/land expenditures relate to various capital projects. The status of significant capital projects with budgets exceeding $5 million is discussed in Attachment 2; " Operating and capital disbursements made as claims are submitted to the Commission by transit operators; " Special studies are under budget due to unused budget authority for toll operations and rail feasibility studies. The Commission will use the authority as the studies are developed; " " " " " Local streets and roads expenditures are related to the timing of Measure A sales tax revenues as previously explained. These financial statements reflect expenditures made to the local jurisdictions related to collections through October 2014; Regional arterial expenditures primarily represent expenditures for the highways and regional arterial program administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). CVAG requests reimbursements from the Commission based on available funds and sufficient budget authority; Debt service principal payments are made annually on June 1, while interest payments are made semi-annually on December 1 and June 1, except for the 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (variable rate) as those interest payments are monthly; Capital outlay expenditures are under budget due to unused budget authority for station security improvements and Commission network, hardware, and software improvements. Staff anticipates using more budget authority by the fourth quarter; and Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan proceeds relate to the Commission entering into a loan agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation for a $421,054,409 TIFIA loan to pay eligible SR-91 CIP costs. The loan is a toll revenue bond (TIFIA Bond) that is subordinate to the 2013 Toll Bonds. Proceeds of the TIFIA Bond may be drawn upon after certain conditions have been met. During the second quarter, the Commission did not draw upon the TIFIA Bond proceeds. Attachments: 1) Quarterly Financial Statements -December 2014 2) Quarterly Project Status -December 2014 Agenda Item SB 39 " Project/Description SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (Design-Build) The project will connect with Orange County Transportation Authority's tolled express lanes at the Orange County/Riverside County line and continue approximately eight miles to the Interstate (1)-15/State Route (SR)-91 interchange. The project involves widening pavement on the outside of the existing highway to reposition general purpose lanes and repurposing the existing High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes to accommodate two-tolled express lanes in the median in each direction. The SR-91 CIP also involves constructing one new general purpose lane in each direction from SR-71 to 1-15, ultimately providing two-tolled express lanes and five general purpose lanes in each direction. SR-91 CIP development activities began in September 2007, construction work related to roadway and structures began in July 2014, and the toll lanes are expected to open in January 2017. The total acquisition and construction cost of the SR-91 CIP is estimated at $1.4 billion, including capitalized interest, debt service reserves, and cost of issuance. 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project The project is currently in the preliminary engineering and environmental phase of work to add up to two-tolled express lanes in each direction from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. The project will use the design-build method of project delivery. Project development activities began in April 2008 and lanes are expected to open to traffic in 2020. The estimated project cost is $415 million. " " ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS 2ND QUARTER FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED 12/31/2014 FY 2014/15 BUDGET $ 426,435,300 6,613,700 $ 2ND QUARTER EXPENDITURES 104,667,950 1,218,907 40 Status The Design-Build contract is on schedule with actual reported progress of 34 percent as of December 31, 2014. Type selections for all bridges and walls are complete. The Commission has acquired and delivered 174 out of 198 Caltrans Parcel Numbers to the Design-Builder. Construction has begun on nine bridges (of 32) and six walls (of 93). Utility relocations (85 total) are well underway. All BNSF Railway track relocations required for project construction are complete. The project has a dynamic community outreach program, which continually interacts with the public to keep it apprised of current project conditions. The substantial completion date of January 2017 is unchanged. The under-run of the FY 2014/15 budget at second quarter can be attributed to three main components: slower ramp-up of major construction than anticipated which resulted in less expenditures for construction; project and construction management, Caltrans support services, and utility relocation costs that have occurred but have yet to be invoiced; and lower than planned right of way (ROW) acquisition and associated goodwill costs through December 2014. Legitimate anticipated cost under-runs (as opposed to billing delays) that have been identified to date are specialized legal services, other professional services, and labor compliance monitoring. Staff continues to advance the project report and environmental document, which is expected to be completed in FY 2015/16. Various methods of project delivery were analyzed in 2013, and ultimately staff received Commission approval in January 2014 to use the Design-Build method of project delivery and begin planning for the Design-Build phase of work. The contract for a project construction management contractor is expected to be finalized in the fourth quarter of FY 2014/15. The project under-run of the FY 2014/15 budget at second quarter is mainly due to billing delays for both the program manager and preliminary engineering firms, as expenditures only include payments for work performed through October 2014 and September 2014, respectively. Legitimate anticipated cost under-runs (as 91/71 Interchange Improvements Project The project is completing final design for interchange improvements to the 91/71 interchange. Final design began in March 2012. The estimated project cost is $123 million. SR-91 HOV Lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 Interchange Construction is on-going along with utility relocation. Construction of the project should be completed in fall of 2015. The estimated project cost is $273 million. 1-215 Corridor Improvements/Scott Road to Nuevo Road The project will add one mixed flow lane in each direction. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and was completed in 2011. Final design began in 2011 and was completed in December 2012; construction began in 2013 and is expected to be completed in 2016. The estimated project cost is $120 million. • 5,835,800 8,912,400 42,509,500 418,320 131,521 9,597,409 • opposed to billing delays) identified to date are general legal support and special legal support costs. All other budgeted costs are occurring as planned. A contract for the final design consultant was awarded at the February 2012 Commission meeting. A notice to proceed with the final design phase was issued in March 2012. Final design was delayed due to the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requirement for a new environmental assessment on potholing on federal property. The ACOE also required preparation of an additional environmental assessment to cover project construction impacts on federal property resulting from the eastbound SR-91 to northbound SR-71 flyover connector. ROW acquisition is expected to begin in the third quarter of FY 2014/15 and final design is expected to be completed during the third quarter of FY 2014/15. The project under-run of the FY 2014/15 budget at second quarter is due to late billing by the final design firm, as only four invoices have been received through December 2014. Additionally, there have been no costs to date for design-only utility agreements, ROW acquisitions, ROW appraisals and maps, and ACOE review. Legitimate anticipated cost under-runs (as opposed to billing delays) identified to date are the Caltrans cooperative agreement and a contract extension with the final design consultant. All other budgeted costs are occurring as planned. Caltrans completed design work and expenditures remain within the budget authority. The majority of utility relocation work is complete; however, submittal of invoices continues to lag. Construction began in April 2012 and is managed by Caltrans .. The notice to proceed for construction was issued in December 2012, and construction started in January 2013. Construction of the second phase of the Perris overcrossing is nearing completion despite the 25 day delay caused by a traffic incident that damaged false work. Work at the south end of the project was accelerated in order to open traffic between Scott Road and Ethanac Road (12 miles) in November 2014. Additionally, the under-run of the FY 2014/15 budget through the second quarter is related to the lag of construction invoice submittals . • " Mid County Parkway A recirculated project report and environmental document is under development for a new corridor from 1-215 to SR-79. The environmental phase is anticipated to be completed in FY 2014/15. Construction of this new facility will be completed over many years as funding becomes available; the project cost is estimated at $1.3 to $1.6 billion. Perris Valley Line and other rail projects The project is in the construction phase with the extension of commuter rail services to the city of Perris. The project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to move into project development. Expected completion date is December 2015 for an estimated project cost of $248.3 million. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the San Jacinto Branch Line at Highgrove. 13,030,800 140,981,300 " 1, 112,337 13,919,224 " Staff continues to work toward the completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Study (EIS). Major milestones have been met and the project is moving forward. A budget amendment was approved by the Commission in April 2014 to allocate additional funding for the completion of Phase II Final EIR/Supplemental EIS. The agreement was signed in June 2014. Submittal of invoices by the consultant continues to lag. Final design is complete, and the FTA awarded the Small Starts Grant Agreement funds. ROW acquisition activities for the station and layover facility at south Perris have been completed. Following the settlement of a lawsuit challenging elements of the California Environmental Quality Act document in July 2013, the construction contract was given full notice to proceed in October 2013 following FTA approval of the Small Starts Grant Agreement. Active construction commenced in January 2014; some construction delays have occurred due to various factors. These delays are not expected to impact the scheduled completion date of December 2015. This list discusses the significant capital projects (i.e., total budgeted costs in excess of $5 million) and related status. Capital project expenditures are generally affected by lags in invoices submitted by contractors and consultants, as well as issues encountered during certain phases of the projects. The capital projects budgets tend to be based on aggressive project schedules. 42 ATTACHMENT 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL 2ND QUARTER • FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED 12/31/2014 FY 2014115 2ND QUARTER REMAINING PERCENT BUDGET ACTUAL BALANCE UTILIZATION Revenues Sales tax $ 261,444,700 $ 79,026,986 $ (182,417,714) 30% Federal reimbursements 83,351,400 10,917,263 (72,434, 137) 13% State reimbursements 92,503,000 10,966,120 (81,536,880) 12% Local reimbursements 6,211,000 195,491 (6,015,509) 3% Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 8,154,600 5,291,237 (2,863,363) 65% Other revenues 575,000 167,711 (407,289) 29% Investment income 2,450,900 1,991,307 (459,593) 81% Total revenues 454,690,600 108,556, 115 (346, 134,485) 24% Expenditures Salaries and benefits 8,280,300 4,269,841 4,010,459 52% Professional and support Professional services 15,736,100 4,079,069 11,657,031 26% Support costs 5,879,100 2, 172,465 3,706,635 37% Total Professional and support costs 21,615,200 6,251,534 15,363,666 29% Projects and operations Program operations -general 21,574,600 4,389,360 17, 185,240 20% Engineering 17,867,000 2,804,259 15,062,741 16% Construction 242,335, 180 27,889,077 214,446,103 12% Design Build 254,803,500 85,117,415 169,686,085 33% Right of way/land 186,083,400 21,261,175 164,822,225 11% Operating and capital disbursements 139,675, 189 44,943,701 94,731,488 32% Special studies 1,070,000 480 1,069,520 0% • Local streets and roads 49,882,000 15,079,561 34,802,439 30% Regional arterials 30,400,000 9,258,795 21,141,205 30% Total projects and operations 943,690,869 210,743,823 732,947,046 22% Debt service Principal 7,400,000 7,400,000 N/A Interest 47,296,200 22,545,660 24,750,540 48% Cost of issuance N/A Payment to escrow agent N/A Total debt service 54,696,200 22,545,660 32,150,540 41% Capital outlay 3,700,000 68,878 3,631, 122 2% Total Expenditures 1,031,982,569 243,879,736 788, 102,833 24% Excess revenues over (under) expenditures (577,291,969) (135,323,621) 803, 165,57 4 23% Other financing sources/(uses) Operating transfer in 526,384,700 104,430,475 (421,954,225) 20% Operating transfer out (526,384,700) (104,430,475) 421, 954 ,225 20% TIFIA loan proceeds 191,600,000 (191,600,000) N/A Debt proceeds N/A Bond premium N/A Bond discount N/A Total financing sources/(uses) 191,600,000 191,600,000 N/A Net change in fund balances (385,691,969) (135,323,621) 994,765,574 35% Fund balance July 1, 2014 986,842,300 1,031,476,421 44,634, 121 105% Fund balance December 31, 2014 $ 601,150,331 $ 896, 152,800 $ 1,039,399,695 149% • 43 " Revenues Sales tax Federal reimbursements State reimbursements Local reimbursements Transportation Urnform Mitiqat1on Fee Other revenues Investment income Total revenues Expenditures Salaries and benefits Professional and support Professional services Support costs Total Professionat and support costs Projects and operations Proaram ooerat1ons-Qeneral Ena1neerinp Construction Desian Build Ri!lhlofwavlland Qperatini:iandcapitaldisbursements Special studies local streets and roads Reoional arterials Tota! oroiectsand operations Debt service Princioal Interest Cost of issuance Pavment to escrow aaent Total debtse1V1ce Capital outlay Total Expenditures Excess revenues over(under) expenditures Otherfinancinqsources/(uses) Qperatinqtransferin Qperatinq transfer out TIFIA loan proceeds Debt proceeds Bond premium Bond discount Totalfinancinq sources/(uses\ Net chanqe in fund balances Fund balanceJu1v 1. 2014 Fund balance December 31, 2014 GENERAL FUND 1,160,000 6,393 124,651 64,146 5,512 1383 1,362,085 2.774.839 $ FSP/ SAFE 1,388,151 (13,800) 971 1,375,322 47,147 MEASURE A SALES TAX WESTERN COUNTY $ 37.644,391 9,528,661 9,453,318 142,054 (56.658) 162,199 37064 56,911,029 1.303,649 COACHELLA VALLEY $ 11,700,466 $ 3942 11,704,408 270 PALO VERDE VALLEY 346.387 346,387 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL BY FUND 2ND QUARTER FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED 12/3112014 " SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 25.292.591 3,091 12 381 25,308,063 $ STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE 2.883.151 7292 2,890,443 TRANSPORTATION $ UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) COACHELLA VALLEY RAIL COMMERCIAL PAPER SALES TAX BONDS TOLL REVENUE BONDS DEBT SERVlCE COMBINED TOTAL $ 79,026.986 1,382,209 10,917,263 10,966,120 195,491 5.347.895 5,291,237 167,711 7.482 580 883.823 350.812 56.199 629.378 1.991.307 5,355,377 580 883,823 350,812 56,199 2.011,587 108,556,115 129.306 14.630 4,269,841 571,459 221,832 3,037,848 77,163 170,767 4,079,069 1.720.884 170.964 274.815 492 5.310 2,172,465 2.292.343 392,796 3,312,663 77,655 176,077 6.251.534 597.003 1.043.664 2.587.894 1.198.657 27,711,914 85.117.415 21.031.539 6,550,759 2,782,071 480 10,638.011 7.147.762 1,043.664 151.067.981 60,433 8.445 7.820 2,923,000 32,266,791 421,080 4,095,163 346.387 9258 795 16.284.778 346.387 32.266.791 421.080 152.979 1.605.602 177,163 229.636 2.165,380 22,545,660 22.545,660 4,389,360 2,804,259 27,889,077 85,117,415 21,261,175 44,943,701 480 15,079,561 9,258.795 210,743,823 22,545,660 22,545,660 68,878 12.275.377 1.483.607 155.692,738 16.285.04-6 3~6.387 32.266.791 421.080 2.372.341 190.707 22.545.660 243,879.736 (10,913.292) 8.827,140 (108,285) (98,781.709) 85.802.802 (9,712,9461 14.580,640) 5.493 (6,958,728) 2,469,363 2,983,036 (190,1271 311,662 (9.138.802) 883,823 350,812 56,199 (20,534,073) (135,323,621) 9.483,378 104,430,475 (5,493) (84,293.1441 (1.280.090) (104.430,475) 8.827.140 76.089.856 5.493 (9.138.802) 311.662 (5.493) (84.293.144) (1.280.090) 9.483.378 (2,086,152) (108,285) (22.691.853) (4,575,1471 (16,097,530) 2.469,363 2,983,036 121,535 878,330 (83,942,332) (1,223,891) (11.050.695) (135,323,621) 10.590. 109 7.890.918 336.826.290 33.433.491 556 115.877.309 55.502.966 57.318.771 4.134.185 28.409.089 199.471.010 _4_5.709.443__ 136.:U2.2ll4 __ _1,Q~JAI�_,_421 $ 8 503 957 $ 7 782 633 $ 314 134 437 $ 28 858 344 $ 556 $ 99 779 779 $ 57 972 329 $ 60 301 807 $ 4 255 729 $ 29 287 419 $ J15 528 678 $ 44 485 552 $ 125 261 $89-$ 896152 800 44 " " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Sales Tax Analysis BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 3 2014 (Q3 2014). BACKGROUND INFORMA T/ON: At its December 2007 meeting, the Commission awarded an agreement to MuniServices, LLC (MuniServices) for quarterly sales tax reporting services plus additional fees contingent on additional sales tax revenue generated from the transactions and use tax (sales tax) audit services. As part of the recurring contracts process, the Commission approved a five-year extension through June 30, 2018. The services performed under this agreement pertain to only the Measure A sales tax revenues. Since the commencement of these services, MuniServices submitted an audit update, which reported findings generated and submitted to the State Board of Equalization (SBOE) for review and determination of errors in sales tax reporting related to 326 businesses. For Q2 2014, the SBOE approved corrections for 231 of these accounts for a total sales tax revenue recovery of $4,683,894. Updated amounts for Q3 2014 will be provided once received from MuniServices. If the SBOE concurs with the error(s) for the remaining claims, the Commission will receive additional revenues; however, the magnitude of the value of the remaining findings was not available. It is important to note that while the recoveries of additional revenues will be tangible, it will not be sufficient to alter the overall trend of sales tax revenues. Additionally, MuniServices provided the Commission with the quarterly sales tax summary report for the Q3 2014. Most of the Q3 2014 Measure A sales tax revenues were received by the Commission in the fourth quarter of calendar year 2014, during October through December 2014, due to a lag in the sales tax calendar. The summary section of the Q3 2014 report is attached and includes an overview of California sales tax receipts, local results, historical cash collections analysis by quarter, summary of the top 25 sales/use tax contributors, historical sales tax amounts, annual sales tax by business category, five-year economic trend for significant business category (auto sales-new), and results . Agenda Item 8C 45 Sales tax receipts for Riverside County were 7.7 percent compared to the Q3 2013. Auto sales- new and restaurants had the largest gains in the Q3 2014 benchmark year; the segments that reflected the smallest gains during the same period were service stations, building materials- wholesale, and light industry. The slower growth in sales tax receipts from service stations, similar to recent prior quarters, can be attributed to lower gas prices. The slowdown in sales tax receipts from building materials-wholesale and light industry can be attributed to a decline in use tax sales on heavy equipment used by energy-related companies in the completion of renewable energy developments in Riverside County. In the Economic Category Analysis below, five of the six categories experienced new highs in the Q3 2014 benchmark year compared to the prior eight benchmark year quarters. Food products and miscellaneous had the largest increases at 7.5 and 6.5 percent, respectively. The food products increase is a result in the steady growth in restaurant prices with no decline in restaurant use. The other economic segments had increases ranging from 3.1 percent to 5.4 percent. Food Products 16.5 I 4.6 Transportation 28.9 I 4.8 28.9 I 6.1 Construction 10.8/ 5.5 10.9 I 4.5 Business to Business 16.8/ 4.4 19.4 / 5.9 14.0/2.l 15.7 I 5.3 Miscellaneous 1.9 / 6.5 1.1 I 2.3 1.1I0.1 1.7 I 1.4 1.0 /-8.1 Total 100.0 I 5.1 100.0/ 4.0 100.0/ 4.6 100.0/ 3.3 100.0/ 5.2 General Retail: Apparel Stores, Department Stores, Furniture/Appliances, Drug Stores, Recreation Products, Florist/Nursery, and Misc. Retail Food Products: Restaurants, Food Markets, Liquor Stores, and Food Processing Equipment Construction: Building Materials Retail and Building Materials Wholesale Transportation: Auto Parts/Repair, Auto Sales -New, Auto Sales -Used, Service Stations, and Misc. Vehicle Sales Business to Business: Office Equip., Electronic Equip., Business Services, Energy Sales, Chemical Products, Heavy Industry, Light Industry, and Leasing Miscellaneous: Health & Government, Miscellaneous Other, and Closed Account Adjustments 21.9 I 3.9 9.3/ 6.3 5.3 / o.6 1.1 /-1.2 100.0/ 1.8 For 7 of the top 10 segments (auto sales-new, department stores, restaurants, miscellaneous retail, apparel stores, food markets, and building materials-retail) during the past eight quarters, sales tax receipts reached a new high point. These 7 segments represent 53.4 percent of the total sales tax receipts. Service stations and light industry, two of the top 10 segments representing 10.7 and 4.3 percent of the total sales tax receipts remained relatively flat compared to their lowest points in Ql 2014 and Q4 2013, respectively. Building materials-wholesale had a slight decrease from the previous Q2 2014 high point. The top 10 segments represent 75.8 percent of the total sales tax receipts. For the other segments representing 24.2 percent of the total sales tax receipts, the segments representing 14.8 percent of the total sales tax receipts reached new high points in the past two years during Q3 2014. In the Economic Segment Analysis below, auto sales-new, service stations, and department stores represent the three largest segments for Riverside County, or 32 percent of total sales taxes. This is the eighth consecutive quarter since Q3 2008 that auto sales-new and department stores have been in the top three economic segments. Growth seen in previous Agenda Item BC 46 • • • " " " quarters for the service stations segment has been declining slowly from the high in the last three years due to lower gas prices; however, in comparing year over year results, service stations had a minor increase of 0.2 percent. Auto Sales-Auto Sales-Department Service Service Restaurants Largest Segment Restaurants Restaurants Restaurants New New Stores Stations Stations % of Total I% Change 10.8 I 9.3 13.5 I 6.7 14.5 I 7.8 11.9/7.7 13.8 I 1.3 14.7 I 6.4 12.1I2.1 13.7/-1.2 21.5 I 3.4 2nd Largest Segment Service Auto Sales-Auto Sales-Department Service Auto Sales-Department Department Misc. Retail Stations New New Stores Stations New Stores Stores % of Total/% Change 10.1 I 0.2 10.5 I 8.5 10.1/7.2 11.4 I o.6 11.1 /-1.0 10.7 I 8.3 11.0 I 1.8 11.2 /-0.8 9.9/ 3.8 Department Department Department Auto Sales-Department Auto Sales-Service 3rd Largest Segment Restaurants Restaurants Stores Stores Stores New Stores New Stations % of Total/% Change 10.5 I 2.4 10.0/0.9 8.4 I 1.2 10.6/ 5.8 10.1/ 11.4 9.7 I o.s 10.6/7.5 10.3 I 6.6 9.8 I o.6 During the review of the Q3 2014 detailed report with MuniServices, information regarding sales tax comparison by city and change by economic category from Q3 2013 to Q3 2014 was provided. Staff continues to monitor monthly sales tax receipts and other available economic data to determine the need for any adjustment to the revenue projections. Staff will utilize the forecast scenarios included with the complete report and recent trends in assessing such projections . Attachments: 1) Sales Tax Digest Summary Q3 2014 2) Quarterly Sales Tax Change Comparison by City for Q3 2013 to Q3 2014 Agenda Item SC 47 " ATTACHMENT 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Digest Summary Collections through December 2014 Sales through September 2014 (2014Q3) CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMIC OUTLOOK California sales tax receipts increased by 6.2% over the same quarter from the previous year, with Northern California reporting a 6.7% increase compared to 5.7% for Southern California. Receipts for the RCTC changed by 7.7% over the same periods. ShopperTrak predicts that Super Saturday, the last day before Christmas, will surpass Black Friday for holiday spending this year. Stores opening Thanksgiving Day has had an impact on shifting sales throughout the fourth quarter. The National Retail Federation is predicting a 4.1% increase in sales for the holiday season, (including online retail sales), which is higher than 2013's 3.1% and more than 4% for the first time since 2011. The Average Retail Price per gallon of Regular Gasoline in California is $2.75. The price is providing the US economy with a multi-billion dollar boost. Low-income and middle-income Americans, who have received only modest wage increases since the economic recovery began in 2009, have benefitted the most. Falling oil prices have negatively impacted countries that are dependent on high prices to pay for costly foreign ventures, like Russia's intervention in the Ukraine and Iran's support of Syria. " LOCAL RESULTS Net Cash Receipts Analysis " Local Collections Share of County Pool 0.0% Share of State Pool 0.0% SBE Net Collections Less: Amount Due County 0.0% Less: Cost of Administration Net 3Q2014 Receipts Net 3Q2013 Receipts Actual Percentage Change Business Activity Performance Analysis Local Collections Less: Payments for Prior Periods Preliminary 3Q2014 Collections Projected 3Q2014 Late Payments Projected 3Q2014 Final Results Actual 3Q2013 Results Projected Percentage Change www.MuniServices.com (8Q{jj 800-8181 $39,615,774 0 0 39,615,774 .00 (479,630) 39,136,144 36,339,615 7.7% $39,615,774 (2,000,825) 37,614,949 1,347,307 38,962,256 36,760,985 6.0% Page 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission HISTORICAL CASH COLLECTIONS ANALYSIS BY QUARTER (in thousands of$) $42,000 ~ $600 $41,000 $40,000 $500 $39,000 ~ -$400 ~ . ::-$38,000 .. .. .. ... """ .. $37,000 i:i:: $300 = ·-.. $36,000 e "Cl z $35,000 < $200 $34,000 $100 $33,000 $32,000 $0 2Q2012 3Q2012 4Q2012 IQ2013 2Q2013 3Q2013 4Q2013 IQ2014 2Q2014 3Q2014 -Net Receipts _.,_SBOE Admin Fees Due TOP 25 SALES/USE TAX CONTRIBUTORS The following list identifies RCTC's Top 25 Sales/Use Tax contributors. The list is in alphabetical order and represents sales from October 2013 to September 2014. The Top 25 Sales/Use Tax contributors generate 22.1% of RCTC's total sales and use tax revenue. ALBERSTON'S FOOD CENTERS AMAZON.COM BEST BUY STORES CARMAX THE AUTO SUPERSTORE CHEVRON SERVICE STATIONS CIRCLE K FOOD STORES COSTCO WHOLESALE DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES DESERT SUNLIGHT HOME DEPOT JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY K MART STORES KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES www.MuniServices.com LOWE'S HOME CENTERS MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORE RALPH'S GROCERY COMPANY ROSS STORES SAM'S CLUB STATER BROS MARKETS TARGET STORES USA SERVICE STATIONS VONS SERVICE STATIONS WAL MART STORES WALGREEN'S DRUG STORES WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION (800) 800-8181 49 PageZ • • • " " " Riverside County Transportation Commission HISTORICAL SALES TAX AMOUNTS The following chart shows the sales tax level from sales through September 2014, the highs, and the lows for each segment over the last two years. (in thousands of$) " 3Q2014 +High " Low $20,000 -.-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ $18,000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 ANNUAL SALES TAX BY BUSINESS CATEGORY (in 1:housands of$) 3Q2014 ...........................9 -t 2Q2014 -t 1Q2014 -t 4Q2013 -t 3Q2013 -I 2Q2013 -I 1Q2013 -t 4Q2012 -I 3Q2012 -I 2Q2012 ............................4 -.. ......................... 7 -.. ....................... 2 ........................ -2 ......................... 8 .......................... 8 ........................... 6 sl $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000 : m General Retail m Food Products " Transportation m Construc'tion m Business To Business " 1"liscellaneous I www.MuniServices.com (800) 800-8181 so Page 3 Riverside County Transportation Commission FIVE-YEAR ECONOMIC TREND: Auto Sales -New $4,500 $4,000 +--------------------------- $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 FINAL RESULTS: April-June 2014 Sales Local Net Cash Collections Less: Pool Amounts Less: Prior Quarter Payments Add: Late Payments Local Net Economic Collections after Adjustments Percent Change from January-March 2013 Sales MUNISERVICES' ON-GOING AUDIT RESULTS This Quarter $254,016 Total to Date $4,857,520 www.MuniServices.com (800) 800-8181 51 $40,507,011 ($-479,630) ($2,049,524) $1,478,836 $40,415,953 UP BY 5.7% • • • Page4 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY Banning Beaumont Blythe Calimesa Canyon Lake Cathedral City Coachella Corona Desert Hot Springs Eastvale Hemet Indian Wells Indio Jurupa Valley La Quinta Lake Elsinore Menifee Moreno Valley Murrieta Norco Palm Desert Palm Springs Perris Rancho Mirage Riverside Riverside County San Jacinto Temecula Wildomar 5.4% -3.2% 5.2% 2.1% 44.8% -1.2% 4.3% 3.7% 19.0% -7.4% -6.0% -3.7% 7.1% 24.5% 2.5% 4.2% -6.9% 3.8% 23.9% �3.8% 2.1% 4.5% 1.4% 6.8% 15.6% 2.5% 6.8% -34.6% 6.5% 6.6% -7.1% 6.2% 7.8% 5.3% 1.2% 8.8% 7.6% 6.4% 5.3% -1.2% 12.4% 4.9% 8.0% 4.6% 6.6% 17.7% 6.5% 8.2% 34.5% 1.5% 11.6% 7.4% 13.5% 11.5% 7.9% 5.9% -3.5% 8.2% 1.2% -4.1% 1.6% 10.2% -4.1% 9.1% -3.4% 10.3% 12.6% 4.2% 10.7% 4.0% 2.8% -0.5% 9.3% 4.4% 6.0% 15.0% 16.3% 23.8% 9.5% -2.4% -3.2% 3.6% 4.7% -8.7% 14.3% -6.0% 5.3% -2.3% 8.1% 3.3% -0.8% 0.4% -3.8% 7.8% 9.2% 1.9% -0.3% 16.9% -2.5% 14.7% -20.8% 6.1% 0.4% 20.2% 7.1% 20.1% -8.8% 16.6% -70.0% 14.5% 2.1% 33.4% -1.9% 14.5% -11.6% 0.8% 8.1% 22.6% -9.6% 22.3% 10.7% -2.7% -0.2% 8.9% 7.9% 2.5% 9.4% 4.7% 11.1% �16.2% 42.4% 6.0% 2.7% -12.3% 1.1% -55.4% 13.6% -31.8% 20.3% 9.9% -1.7% 5.4% 6.2% -19.5% 64.5% -20.2% -62.8% -21.9% 63.4% -32.2% -2.5% 17.5% -27.8% 8.7% -43.3% -2.9% 0.9% 32.4% 7.0% 3.9% 10.8% -6.1% -3.0% -1.7% 85.5% -6.5% 14.2% -9.2% -37.2% 145.8% 0.6% 8.9% -35.3% 1.3% " 887,536 401,067 8,186,734 3,140,088 160,139 1,429,882 2,049,393 1,814,029 1,335,160 2,017,709 1,942,479 820,284 2,030,174 7,138,848 3,541,315 2,390,544 1,453,923 6,924,935 364,817 118,444 1,824,536 311,049 522,169 3,063,299 809,012 4,526,986 12,616,365 35,518 1,280,388 52 856,829 405,242 8,073,844 2,919,555 155,326 1,419,698 1,971,525 1,692,048 1,195,870 1,995,433 1,826,710 786,857 1,868,596 7,212,522 3,287,638 2,287,799 1,381,883 6,532,480 322,061 93,773 1,690,865 323,623 508,190. 2,856,323 737,939 4,453,791 11,448,682 40,187 1,156,838 3.6% Department Stores -1.0% Light Industry 1.4% Furniture/Appliance 7 .6% Leasing 3.1% Department Stores 0. 7% Auto Parts/Repair 3.9% Restaurants 7.2% Auto Sales -New 11.6% Service Stations 1.1% Service Stations 6.3% Service Stations 4.2% Restaurants 8.6% Miscellaneous Other -1.0% Apparel Stores 7. 7% Heavy Industry 4.5% Auto Sales -New 5.2% Bldg.Matls-Whsle 6.0% Auto Sales -New 13.3% Service Stations 26.3% Restaurants 7 .9% Auto Sales -New -3.9% Restaurants 2.8% Restaurants 7 .2% Restaurants 9.6% Food Markets 1.6% Light Industry 10.2% Auto Sales -New -11.6% Miscellaneous Retail 10.7% Energy Sales ATTACHMENT 2 Restaurants Bldg.Matis-Retail Service Stations Misc. Vehicle Sales Restaurants Restaurants Bldg.Matls-Whsle Food Markets Bldg.Matls-Whsle Apparel Stores Bldg.Matis-Retail Auto Sales -New Light Industry Miscellaneous Retail Auto Sales -New Restaurants Food Markets Auto Sales -Used Food Markets Recreation Products Service Stations Food Markets Service Stations Apparel Stores Service Stations Office Equipment Service Stations Auto Parts/Repair Restaurants Office Equipment Service Stations Chemical Products Apparel Stores Service Stations Food Markets Service Stations Service Stations Bldg.Matis-Retail Department Stores Food Markets Bldg.Matis-Retail Office Equipment Bldg.Matls-Whsle Furniture/ Appliance Light Industry Miscellaneous Retail Energy Sales Electronic Equipment Furniture/ Appliance Furniture/ Appliance Bldg.Matls-Whsle Auto Sales -Used Health & Government Light Industry Auto Parts/Repair Heavy Industry Department Stores Bldg.Matls-Whsle " Bldg.Matis-Retail Restaurants Auto Sales -New Bldg.Matls~Whsle Misc. Vehicle Sales Bldg.Matls~Retail Department Stores Light Industry Food Processing Eqp Bldg.Matls-Whsle Furniture/ Appliance Misc. Vehicle Sales Miscellaneous Retail Electronic Equipment Miscellaneous Retail Furniture/ Applia nee Office Equipment Light Industry Light lndustry Miscellaneous Retail Heavy Industry Heavy Industry Auto Parts/Repair Office Equipment Food Processing Eqp Heavy Industry Light Industry Misc. Vehicle Sales Food Markets " " " " AG> � A�.e�� � .. D. A' : ),1� �:�'''�"�; ' �,: ,,:,,,: /--~;,." .�> �,, > ��-,.--'�--~-:-.�,-.:"' .. ";_~~.~ ' " 1 " . '. ... �" / \ " . ;,,l ~ . " ' -,-, ~' ., __ .. t,, - -1':, -; :/~_-_ ,,,,,' .. --':~ ., ' ::. --~, ~ " ':~'-.!';~ � .. -~~, ' -~"-~<'~, " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Megan Kavand, Accounting Technician Anne Hallberg, Accounting Supervisor THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. BACKGROUND INFORMA TJON: For the past few years and as a result of a low interest rate environment, the Commission's quarterly investment reports have reflected investments primarily concentrated in the Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund (RCPIF). Other investments included the state Local Agency Investment Fund and mutual funds. In connection with the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds and toll revenue bonds and the execution of Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), the Commission anticipated the need to engage an investment manager for the bond proceeds and other required funds. Additionally, the Commission desired to engage an investment manager to provide investment advisory and management services related to the Commission's operating funds. Accordingly, at its May 2013 meeting, the Commission awarded two investment management services agreements to Logan Circle Partners, L.P. (Logan) for SR-91 CIP funds and to Payden & Rygel Investment Management (Payden & Rygel) for Commission operating funds. Logan invested the SR-91 CIP debt proceeds during the first quarter of FY 2013/14 in the Short- Term Actively Managed Program (STAMP). Since most of the first quarter activity concentrated in the investment and accounting for the SR-91 CIP financing, Payden & Pygel has not yet been authorized to make specific investments for the Commission's operating funds. The quarterly investment report for the second quarter of FY 2014/15 as required by state law and Commission policy reflects the increased investment activities resulting from the SR-91 CIP. The quarterly investment report includes the following information: Agenda Item 80 53 " Investment Portfolio Report; " " STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category; STAMP Portfolio by Account; " STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account; " STAMP Portfolio Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; and " County of Riverside Investment Report for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2014. The Commission's investments were in full compliance with the Commission's investment policy adopted on September 10, 2014. Additionally, the Commission has adequate cash flows for the next six months. Attachments: 1) Investment Portfolio Report 2) STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category 3) STAMP Portfolio by Account 4) STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account 5) STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments 6) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Summary of Investments 7) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of Investments 8) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Summary of Investments 9) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments 10) STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments 11) County of Riverside Investment Report Agenda Item 80 54 " " " " Riverside County Transportation Commission Investment Portfolio Report Period Ended: December 31, 2014 OPERATING FUNDS City National Bank Deposits County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Subtotal Operating Funds FUNDS HELD IN TRUST County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund: Local Transportation Fund Subtotal Funds Held in Trust COMMISSION MANAGED PORTFOLIO US Bank Money Market First American Government Obligation Fund Cost of Issuance Fund BNY Mellon Money Market Subtotal Commission Managed Portfolio STAMP PORTFOLIO for 91 CIP FAIR VALUE 5,428,971 452,205,261 3,631,466 461,265,698 92,878,615 92,878,615 5,712,563 5,712,563 " RATING COUPON PAR MOODYSIFITCHIS&P RATE VALUE A31BBB+ NIA Aaa-bf/AAAN1 NIA Not Rated NIA Aaa-bflAAAN1 NIA Aaa-mfl-IAAAm NIA Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Subtotal STAMP Portfolio 44,499,563 110,723,574 18,410,498 21,902,162 71,486,173 See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details 267,021,970 TOTAL All Cash and Investments 826,878,846 500,000,000 450,000,000 400,000,000 350,000,000 ---Nature of Investments a STAMP Portfolio for91 CIP Reserve " STAMP Portfolio for 91 CtP Project Fund 300.000.000 r 1== "'""' -~, .... rn .. .,.,~-2so.ooo.ooo Interest 200,000,000 r-II Commission Managed Portfolio Debt ~ Reserve 150,000,000 /"'"' -----/ &Trust Funds 100,000,000 50,000,00: [~=---------~""''""'~"'~ mi Operating Funds 55 ATTACHMENT 1 " PURCHASE MATURITY YIELD TO PURCHASE MARKET UNREALIZED DATE DATE MATURITY COST VALUE GAIN (LOSS) NIA 0.44% NIA 0.44% NIA ----�-�-----��-��-----�--�--�---------���-�----��-���--�--��-���� Portfolio Investment Type 32.17% Fixed Income 0.69% Mutual Funds 66.57% County Pool/Cash " ATTACHMENT 2 " STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended December 31, 2014 56 Page 2 of 18 STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended December 31, 2014 " " " 00 Ll'l " " " ~~~~~ STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended December 31, 2014 • .m " " " "' 0 ,_ . :!' a. " " STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended December 31, 2014 62 ATTACHMENT 4 " Page 8of18 " STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended December 31, 2014 _,J.1!.1~..t.?.~!LQQ._ ... __ �-���------.. _ .. ___ :. ____________ .JA.t?.~Q. " .QQ9.:9..Q2. ___ .. ___________ ..:_ ________ ~ _____ : _______ 1~Q~QQ.. .... -�-��--� " ----���������--�����������������������������������������������: .. age9of18 " STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended December 31, 2014 64 " Page 10 of 18 " STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended December 31. 2014 " _.J.l.~-~}.!2!.~:.!.L.-�--�-.. -......... H.\~.~.?.J.?... " " ge11of18 " " " -c: ::s 0 u u <( ...,. >. ....- .0 0 N t:: -0 ....-c.M QI ... 0::: QI .0 g E �-QI -u u QI :Jl 0 c: "C nl QI ... "C I-c: 0 QI = :i-0 QI -t:: t:: nl 0 ::s a. 0 a. :!E ~ en w 0 N . ~ . ll. lD lD " ~>U,d\i>.f,Wi<i ll'"/.;fu'\/'" (\I', ] .i 10i1,tJ(}t),;);;,: ' 11 j: ~ ~ J v:J,000-,Q" J\~ "<o.t~~r.,ni~n " STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments for quarter ended December 31, 2014 llL " ." ���� Ctnh ('l).O!iif1') i '-� uvM ttlMtt'ltl r~4 \ 1 l':#o) ~ ........... ~;;:�-~ -Ot:hu (8.:lO..l,_...) \ fHl.MC.C~ (Z.'tlmiiJ-,,, '-ABS a.S7V:\i "'�� rm11A CMO (l. l..S~W.I -.,....,. MtJNll ((j,;'j" l~.4 --.......... ~P<t:t.E>i1\\\}-' us cov n!l.tW~ I Ot~r (4 ... IJIAQ) -...._ ~(4 ... ~ I M"t\irlpal{:i.l"S.9!'f;)��....,, --c:i>{'il.IC"""" Mon:gitgl? &u:ked (9'.IJ'S:S%t -67 " ATTACHMENT 5 .I SovetitM}tl US,J01'4) ...-�"' e:kil.lrn. (lO-otH5'! ..... ._ U:i"11o1flb:lpa.b. f5.7!i~ ~ . ......_ Chem1c.>Jk tG.S.J~~ ; -AUMI M;snufaaUh!!'!I. tS.<U(\"'1 l. t...M:lrlme.rd.d Mtl~ t~ ~.J/'14) ,.../�-lndustrl&I (Eo.78%!} ' ... 'Ul:llity (lB.7li:llo) " " " ATTACHMENT 6 STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended December 31, 2014 ;.,,1,;.>,".i/.'OV / Cte11:1rk 1ll' $)?!*~ .:0.000,000 '$ ~ O\l:tt:~ (3S,7"4 tM .... ...,...., .'lt).jl(j{l,{)'fJ{) �-Cllemli:.ab (13.~IDl!l ;?:)i)()0," 'tt)1) I :J. C" t" t;.~)W') CU-tl'llttH.r'S f<f ... !l<lolll!;) /~ / ,, OllaCl.uS" .-vk:~ (4,4!li4'J(.}-"' I LWu!MQ 15,0841~ ; \.. OO&Gai (13,'6 7~~ C:Ub ~0.04~ �1 M.:.onit'1 Mai�ke.t rul'ld" " :O.a4;%) -���� lll!lh'!I i:V 01~ -�-� ---"� lncft.o~nbl (S;".~18'<1) ' \_ CP !~ O~!l!O L l"i.lbd lut.QUW (~.9.'l3-~ '�'"'" 68 l! ~ + Jl °' -w; j . J • 10<.)}.J(J(},l.'I~~ 30 0G0.i.:>-OU ..tll,<PJ\..>,{><J<J • ATTACHMENT 7 • STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended December 31, 2014 .. -i. -·-1.. ~W.if l!'U"t)IS'"I' r;Q'-1 4A;t~l -WM\lffD \QS1~ Vl'DN (l.71:1.\:"J__,.. AQ iS . ..?71'(1 _, .. ~ lUUNI ~ft.?M%) .... ,/ ~ Cf' /Sl.398'» 69 r t1~1(1:1'ic os,s...~ I Other t34 . .!l.9~-......,, ,.--US.MUn1apal1: 1.11'.e'>I~ -...,__ Cl'l•Mfo:::ll!t' (l>.4.H!!(> / "food tG.OO>XI -~ \ Ntt.IW {ILHl\$1 M-drtQa!JP. Backed. m. U !t!Q ·1 G:l$h(Q.iJ.!»Q~ n!Wl(;ial ,z.19~ :;.::.."'-.:;:::-::;,·· ' "'''*"bdi.ed (5.:;rn~-­tmuucfJ*I ut.t:>~J."X..J -..., --lt1dt.1&tfitd (~~ • .<!)4~) 'l) g ;. .li ; ~ '>'! >l •. 5 • .~,i>t:(l,UOf! ~.,(\Q,),01)(;: • ATTACHMENT 8 ST AMP Portfolio Series A & Series 8 Reserve Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended December 31, 2014 L Hw.t 1m-o-t"N ~ <,,!'.~) Ott\t;r U.191~) 1 l'Hl.MCf?,111'") ··-...........,...,I 1\.M>C CMO tS,7~:m! ·---. ~NMA (I fl. <;,ou;~ ,_,/ AGO( aoNO \16.2 r.s~.J 70 f'NMA QJUJ11\tr1ll l't A681\il -........,,. Conmmnj111IMIJS ll"S.614'.fJO -·--<:ad1 ta.ti-'4~1 -·-lt.,'\1"j0Vt4ti.<.IJ1.Q'tll ,.,...._. 8s.tued !~.1M'N ,/" -..._:~""'9H(t;~.:.>4il'li..j • .. _ Gewt<rt1mem (4G.!lC~ J ! t: "' !J: ,, Zi • :.•f.J<l/.IUC • • ATTACHMENT 9 STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended December 31, 2014 MIJNI l'.>.BS:.?%J -, ..... ., lMC ("-") 0.4~~!-......_ CO~!' {4J.6B~·, tJS ~~UV (~ <f'iohl'O,l --~ ,_..,.,. .. i CP' !2:l,l1<t%J { L t:11i:,.111w"'1r1-. 1<'1<.1.ii<.,..m.1 71 otberAlt'i ''t.'SJI~> us Mwnld.,.Ji. e;.aa?1i0 ~~r'l!!ign (~-YA:i~ _ __,.,,,,., Cv1rimuc:lftl Mas '{10,;ot".> . ...; c;-mem l"l.!f<ih~ -........_, Utility (}.), l 79M ~-· / Mnrt~llmrltflf~l4.tl.l;\l-' /~ th.nils (:ll.44£111,l ........ ~ . .._ AW'W M.,,1;11\n:ture~ (l8.<l'S 4!'0 \ \...E.1.c:'Q'tc UJ:.>1:.1'.6~ (">$;'' (.;._.,!'i!:ttrJ /,. nnam:.:1;it (ZOA l.,~) / '·-!t1dwstrl1tl t<J;;_.-i62!1iel " '>~l,(.>fl:;,'.11~: .o.N.J:).;.me 'll ,, ~ 1 ~ll.i'J(l:.i.rJW] ;;;; ;:: w " :l! ~ '~ ,U,<Y.i\J,~)IJ<,; CB:Sh ICl.HJ!lill !'40>ne., M.io,�k.e~ f'umh i(l.J!:!H!i)C) "-������--.1 " " ATTACHMENT 10 STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended December 31, 2014 �Mti.tl lll.5"()"'16) ~Pil(llHlll f4.6<t9'l';l -.... ,. ,..,...-~fl,.iOrtf .. ~l./IJJ~ Diwr:slflcd l'kwn .se,v-IS,1'33),)) -...... MW Manuf111~li�ors .f;)l _g l~ ___ .. US M" mtdP1SJ1!11 iS. 7<1:;11.1, _ _,.,,/ &a .. i.. \!}.l81S1f~ J \.. C<H'l'lmt1relul MM: (13.2.M;() f>Hl.MC. CMO {j.Hll:>).) ......_ l.W:ustr-lal �!13.62~1 -~...,~ ,.,,,.,,.,--coYt:rl'ltT><;.t1; 1J5.:ria" ,) ..,. " .,.,-~�US GOV \"3~.i'.2~ M(JUI (8:14~~ ' -... NMA O'>'IO (15.af:;l'!Q H!W:n(bl H:\.1'!8.no -���"' CORP (30, 14~ .J " � f.'lw.tr lnt'tWt" 1" \'<Iv '>~YI!~ " Mottg:ao" ft.:t.clt" d r.n. oi6"1 72 " " " ATTACHMENT 11 Decemb~ll~ County of Riverside w'" wm wl' 1 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund "An Oil Soaked Black Swan" As discussed in our last quarterly com- mentary, one of the potential black swans we were watching just crash landed in a pool of crude oil; it was on our list along with Ebola, terrorism, and the anemic European economy. We did not, however, expect along with the rest of the financial community to see the swift and enormous price collapse in oil coming. The great news here is that for every dollar decline in gas prices it adds over $100 billion dollars in savings for the fuel consuming public, creating a tailwind for U.S. economic growth, and higher GDP. Supply, declining demand, U.S. dollar strength, OPEC (particularly Saudi) reluctance to cut production as well as investor sentiment shifting away from oil are all at play in this mas- sive shift in prices. Oil has dropped over 40% from about $90 in September to about $53 at the end of December with further price drops likely, making this event one of the largest oil price declines in history. Bond investors like the TPIF should now focus on how the collapse in oil prices will impact both the bond market and interest rates, as well as the concern that deflation will out- weigh the potential economic benefits that lower oil prices will bring. As of this writing, it feels as if market jitters and fears of deflation are compet- ing with the headlines for economic growth. The down side to cheaper oil is many investments in oil and gas production made here in the USA had the expectation of being priced much higher than it is now. This could slow in- vestments being made in the energy sector and II cause defaults in the high yield bond market with a spillover into the equity markets. Over time it could harm domestic production with wells being idled, forgoing new drilling permits, and, cutting jobs. The million dollar questions are how low will crude oil go and for how long will it stay there? Will cheaper energy prices spur the economy enough to offset sliding oil prices and the trail of wreckage in the oil patch? Only time will tell. Thanks to cheaper energy costs (as well as a decline in many other commodities), the FED thinks inflation will end up around 1.3% next year according to projections released on December 17th, and will not return to 2%, which had been the previous target. As a result, rates could rise slower and/ or later than expected. The Fed has stated it would be "patient'' about tight- ening. Chairwoman Yellen told reporters that she would like to see unemployment fall further and wages rise with the expectation . that this might create more economic growth. For now we will continue to watch 2015 for what promis- es to bring heightened volatility and will invest accordingly. Happy New Year! Don Kent Treasurer-Tax Collector Capital Markets Team Don Kent Treasurer-Tax Collector Jon Christensen Asst. Treasurer-Tax Collector Giovane Pizano Investment Manager Isela Llcea Asst. Investment Manager Investment Objectives The primary objective of the treasurer shall be to safeguard the princip1d of the fands under the treasurer's control, meet the liquidity needs of the depositor, and achieve a return on the fumls under his or her control. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATED: Aaa-bf BY MOODY'S INVESTOR'S SERVICE AND AAA/Vl BY FITCH RATINGS December October August July 5,895,845,894.96 5,899,853,397.68 0.43 4,619,489,691.81 4,619,977,432.54 4,6~5,137,882.96 4,689,7 4,738,289,860.85 4,739 ,621,367.03 0.42 The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is comprised of the County, Schools, Special Districts7!Jnd other Discretionary Depositors. 1.24 1.33 1.21 1.30 Current Market Data Economic Indicators 1zyos?'tow07:ci.'''NO"fi1ttamPPayrmli'fVfiM'~gi!~~ounts m~T>~r·b"f pnae'inIJ1oye#swcirKlligpii:ftl-··Lc··''" 0'23'oitfffb~ · . · ·· ·tbh'e ~~ ful1lfintt? ih the nation's business and gover:futient~5tatiiisiune'nt5; ; ... 12/05/2014 12/23/2014 Employment Situation: Measures the numbe;~f~employed as a percentage of the labor force. Real Gross Domestic Product -Q/Q change: The broadest measure of aggregate economic activity and encompasses every sector of the economy. GDP is the country's Factory Orders M/M change: Represents the dollar level of new orders for both durable and nondurable goods. 5.8% 5.8% 0.0% -0.7% 13:ffil~~ Fed Funds Target Rate Stock Indices S&P 500 Index Commodities Increase to 0.75% 0.0% 0.0% FOMC Meeting Schedule 29-0ct 0-.25% Growth ---·~···-~~--·~· .. ------·--------~· 17-Dec 0-.25 % Growth US Treasury Curve (.M/M) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 7 4 2 • " " " TIMMI The Treasurer's Institutional Money Market Index (TIMMI) is compiled and reported by the Riverside County Treasurer's Capital Markets division. It is a composite index derived from four AAA rated prime institutional money market funds. Similar to the Treasurer's Office, prime money market funds invest in a diversified portfolio of U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments including U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, commercial paper, certificates of deposits, repurchase agreements, etc. TIMMI is currently comprised of the five multi billion dollar funds listed below. 1.00% _.,_Pool Yield -TIMMI 0.40% 0.40% 0.42% 0.41% 0.42% 0.44% 0.44% 0.46% 0.43% 0.50% 0.33% 0.37% 0.39% 0.37% " " " " " " " " " .. .. " " 0.05% 0.04% 0.04% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.04% 0.05% 0.05% 0.06% 0.00% Dec-13 Feb-14 Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Cash Flows 01/2015 411.00 �~�~~~~=w~"'~ 650.00 1,289.48 1,306.70 02/2015 650.00 910.86 296.35 920.00 197.00 505.00 178.45 443.02 50.00 08/2015 75.00 197.34 09/2015 200.00 10.00 175.00 88.16 250.00 0.00 12/2015 1,900.00 975.00 925.00 1,175.00 125.00 TOTALS 11,595.00 12,401.84 (806.84) 1,570.84 2,471.00 3,526.23 4,329.01 26.63% 59.77% 73.37% * All values reported in millions($) . The Pooled Investment Fund cash flow requirements are based upon a 12 month historical cash flow model. Based upon projected cash receipts and maturing investments, there are sufficient funds to meet future cash flow disbursements over the next 12 months. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 75 3 Asset Allocation • CALTRUST FND 54,ooo.oo: · 54,000.001 .003 .003! .003 --~~-·-·--5.4601 5.460 ~~--~--~--~~' ' ,~,_,., ·-··----.--. ~~~~ DDA/PASSBK 195,ooo.oor 195,000.00 . ··-~-·-··-···~····-···-~--··-· LOCAL AGCY OBLIG 395.00I 395.00 ·----~---~·-·-····~:;t--···--··-·-~·-+-····--.. ··--·----:::::-:::-:-:::r--:::c'"'. US TREAS BONDS 585,000.00 584,885.55 --~~·---· •..... 1.411 i 1.411 ~-·--·---··-····-·-3 301,380.40' 301,458.88 ---~-~~--+-----·· .3851 .385 3.081 FHIMC BONDS ~--~3,~~?·07r· =~=-···--·· 593~3~~.78 . -~~~-~~_::~_<:)_::~ . _!5_5,97~.2~l .. .. 156,008 FNMA BONDS _ 613,445.48t---· FHLB DISC NOTES 184,968.80 •••··-~·-·~--····-•• •·~-•' •••••~•-•••-·-----• FHLB BONDS 761,025. 761,008.11 I ••·--··-·-·--• • ' mm oo -~-i ::~ ~~~D~O~IES ·-··-··· 1~~:~~:~~] .. _ ..... ~~~:~::~~~ ·-·----••••o.•.••-••o•••• m o ooo "'" o o o o m 0 o • • ·•-•mo 0 0 ~ •••••-•••••• m ••-.mo•••••mmOmm.OOOi FMAC DISC NOTES 25,000.001 24,974.991 24,991 ---~-~--------·~·------+····· ........ ~ ......... \ ........... ~-····-·-···-· FARMER MAC 293,850.001 293,831.79! 293,703. o••omoo•oo.oo•OOO-•-••"""'"" •• '• ·•--. oooooooooO-•mm-•omol o •• •••••'"'"'•""'' •+•·••••"'" ••m•~''•'O'••mOOm ooOomm MUNI ZERO CPNS 38,450.001 38,432.50) 38,435. MUNI 0BONi5s-··~-~ 81,200.oor··~-······~· 81]83.59f'"-........ -.. 'fil,183-:- .,.~.,_. .. .,_.~·-~·-·--·v··--·-"'·-·~····--"~"""""•·· • • •-• "'"" •• •• •• •• •• t 724,700.00\ • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 76 4 Maturity Distribution • CALTRUST FND DDA/PASSBK 195,000.00 LOCAL AGCY OBLIG US TREAS BONDS 75,000.00 400,000.00 FHLMC DISC NOTES 5,000.00 25,000;00 271,571.00 FHLMCBONDS 75,000.00 130,625.00 FNMA BONDS 70,000.00 166,887.00 FHLBBONDS 30,000.00 20,000.00 245,000.00 118,685.71 FFCB DISC NOTES 180,061.00 FFCB BONDS 65,000.00 75,000.00 272,150.00 145,070.00 FMAC DISC NOTES 25,000.00 FARMER MAC 80,000.00 25,000.00 60,000.00 30,000.00 MUNI ZERO CPNS 38,450.00 12,070.00 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 77 395.00 110,000.00 110,705.00 277,518.00 102,752.00 274,060.00 69,500.00 277,840.00 50,000.00 8,850.00 90,000.00 _ _,, __ - -al.TIWSffiJIO·--llOAI---· -IJ)Qll.lllilt:t-.Jili·---USTRUS---· -l'lll.lllCOllllClllOTES·-l'V -l'lll.lllCllOllDl--Pu . -MMAlllSC!liCllU·~- -MMA--~· -FliUlmstllOTES·---mll-·-· FJCll.OllllCllOTES·-· -m:a.------msc-----F-IMC·-PM --mems--l'V ---·-Pu ---lt--Plt< 195,000.00 .395.00 585,000.00 ~01~71.00 593,848.00 613,699.00 761,025.71 1B0,06UI() 607,220.00 25,000.00 293,850.00 38,450.00 5 Credit Quality AA- MOODY'S llOOKl!ll ..... ,_ ·All·~ ·Ml·• ••·• • ._,.~ ·llR·M 4,179,801.71 305,690.00 4,178,826.67 305,521.15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 78 S&P ••·il1M> •M-·• •M+·M •M·W. •M·8 4,174,637.90 305,593.12 100.02% • • 0.14% 0.16% • 6 Month End Portfolio Holdings !\.laturity Yield To P.tr Book Market Market Unre<lhzed Mod1f1ed Yea.is To CUSIP Description Dale Coupon Maturity Value Value Prim Value GainjLoss Duration Maturity Fund: 1 POOL FUND MPFXX CJPXX CLTR CALTRUST HERITAGE 01/01/2015 FIDELITY PRIME 01/01/2015 FEDERATED PRIME 01/01/2015 MORGAN STANLEY 01/01/2015 JP MORGAN PRIME 01/01/2015 CALTRUSTSHTTERM 01/01/2015 DD ASSBK .081 .076 .029 .044 .067 .392 .081 .076 .029 .044 .067 .392 150,000,000.00 135,000,000.00 65,000,000.00 70,000,000.00 85,000,000.00 54,000,000.00 150,000,000.00 135,000,000.00 65,000,000.00 70,000,000.00 85,000,000.00 54,000,000.00 100.000000 100.000000 100.000000 100.000000 100.000000 100.000000 150,000,000.00 135,000,000.00 65,000,000.00 70,0CI0,000.00 85,000,000.00 54,IXJ0,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 .003 CASH UB MANAGED RATE 01/01/2015 .081 .081 195,000,000.00 195,000,000.00 100.000000 195,000,000.00 0.00 ...... lilliii ............................................ .. LAO US DIST COURTHOUSE 06/15/2020 .955 .955 395,000.00 395,000.00 100.000000 395,000.00 0.00 912828UP3 U.S. TREASURY BOND '12/113/2015 .250 .197 25,000,000.00 25,017,578.13 100.f127000 25,006,750.00 -10,8113.13 912828SE1 U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2015 .250 .192 25,000,000.00 25,018,554.69 100.019000 25,004,750.00 -13,804.69 912828UP3 U.S. TREASURY BOND f12/113/201S .250 .197 25,000,000.00 25,017,578.13 J00.f127000 25,006,750.00 -10,8113.13 912828TM2 U.S. TREASURY BOND 08/31/2017 .625 1.013 5,000,000.00 4,937,109.38 99.047000 4,952,350.00 15,240.62 9128113TB6 U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2017 .750 .932 5,000,000.00 4,971,875.00 99.625000 4,981,250.00 9,375.00 912828UG3 U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/15/2016 .375 .225 25,000,000.00 25,047,851.56 100.063000 25,015,750.00 -32,101.56 912828UG3 U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/15/2016 .375 .237 25,000,000.00 25,043,945.31 100.063000 25,015,750.00 -28,195.31 912828UG3 U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/15/2016 .375 .184 25,000,000.00 25,057,617.19 100.063000 25,015,750.00 -41,867.19 9128113VC1 U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2016 .250 .324 25,000,000.00 24,971,679.69 99.789000 24,947,250.00 -24,429.69 912828TWO U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/31/2017 .750 .970 25,000,000.00 24,837,890.63 99.203000 24,800,750.00 -37,140.63 912828WH9 U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2017 .875 .752 25,000,000.00 25,077,148.44 100.055000 25,013,750.00 -63,398.44 9128113VCI U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2016 .250 .335 25,000,000.00 24,967,773.44 99.789000 24,947,250.00 -20,523.44 9128113VC1 U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2016 .250 .335 25,000,000.00 24,967,m.44 99.789000 24,947,250.00 -20,523.44 912828VC1 U.S. 1REASURY BOND 05/15/2016 .250 .324 25,000,000.00 24,971,679.69 99.789000 24,947,250.00 -24,429.69 912828SC5 U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2017 .875 .641 25,000,000.00 25,129,882.81 100.289000 25,072,250.00 -57,632.81 912828F54 U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/15/2017 .875 .951 25,000,000.00 24,945,312.50 99.617000 24,904,250.00 -41,062.50 9128113B82 U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/29/2016 .250 .238 25,000,000.00 25,003,906.25 99.875000 24,968,750.00 -35,156.25 9128113VC1 U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2016 .250 .292 25,000,000.00 24,984,375.00 99.789000 24,947,250.00 -37,125.00 912828G46 U.S. TREASURY BOND 11/30/2016 .500 .528 25,000,000.00 24,986,328.13 99.750000 24,937,500.00 -48,8113.13 912828G46 U.S. TREASURY BOND 11/30/2016 .500 .528 25,000,000.00 24,986,328.13 99.750000 24,937,500.00 -48,828.13 912828G46 U.S. TREASURY BOND 11/30/2016 .500 .641 25,000,000.00 24,930,664.06 99.750000 24,937,500.00 6,835.94 912828B41 U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2016 .375 .278 25,000,000.00 25,027,343.75 100.047000 25,011,750.00 -15,593.75 912828UG3 U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/15/2016 .375 .267 25,000,000.00 25,029,296.88 100.063000 25,015,750.00 -13,546.88 9111328VC1 U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2016 .250 .418 25,000,000.00 24,941,406.25 99.789000 24,947,250.00 5,843.75 2.820 .161 .126 .161 2.630 2.470 1.035 1.035 1.035 1.368 2.792 2.342 1.368 1.368 1.368 2.055 2.743 1.163 J.368 1.904 1.904 1.903 1.079 1.035 1.367 1.034 5.460 .162 .126 .162 2.668 2.499 1.041 1.041 1.041 1.373 2836 2373 1.373 1.373 1.373 2088 2.792 1.164 1.373 1.918 1.918 1.918 1.085 1.041 1.373 1.041 912828UG3 U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/15/2016 .375 .320 25,000,000.00 25,014,648.44 100.063000 25,015,750.00 1,101.56 ........................................................... -- 313396l<P7 313396FQ1 313396FE8 313396FP3 313396FE8 313396FH1 313396GZO 313396GZO 313396GZO 313396GX5 3134G3S50 3134G34B3 3134G34B3 3134G34B3 3134G34B3 3134G34B3 3134G34B3 3134G34B3 3134G33R9 3134G3SSO 3134G36)4 3134G36)4 3134G36J4 3134G4MB1 3134G4M88 3134G4PC6 3134G4PC6 3!34G4QA9 3!34G4QQ4 3137EADLO 3137EADLO 3137EADLO 3134G5F75 3134G5E68 3134G5F75 3134G5GM1 3134G5GM1 3134G5GX7 •3134G5~~~ HL2 HY4 3134G5KZ7 31.34G5LW3 FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DJSC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DJSC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DlSC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC-DISC NOTE FHLMC4Yr FHLMC 3YrNc2YrB FHLMC 3YrNc2YrB FHLMC 3YrNc2YrE FHLMC 3YrNc2YrB FHLMC 3YrNc2YrB FHLMC 3YrNc2YrB FHLMC 3YrNc2YrE FHLMC 3YrNc1YrE FHLMC4Yr FHLMC 3.5YrNc3MoB FHLMC 3YrNc3MoB FHLMC 3.5YrNc3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC3.5Yr FHLMC3.5Yr FHLMC 3.25Yr FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 01/02/2015 07/10/2015 '12/02/2015 08/18/2015 05/15/2015 05/05/2015 05/14/2015 05/05/2015 05/08/2015 06/17/2015 06/17/2015 06/17/2015 06/15/2015 11/01/2016 01/28/2016 01/113/2016 01/113/2016 01/28/2016 01/28/2016 01/28/2016 01/28/2016 01/15/2016 11/01/2016 09/14/2016 09/14/2016 09/14/2016 12/18/2018 12/18/2018 12/17/2018 12/17/2018 12/27/2018 12/27/2018 09/29/2017 09/29/2017 09/29/2017 08/21/2019 08/20/2019 08/21/2019 08/28/2019 08/28/2019 09/16/2019 09/04/2019 09/26/2019 09/26/2019 09/30/2019 10/23/2019 11/20/2019 .100 .150 .090 .170 .075 .075 .070 .070 . 070 .105 .105 .105 .175 .625 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .450 .625 .650 .650 .650 1.500 1.375 ).375 1.375 1.500 1.500 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.500 1.750 1.500 1.700 1.700 1.625 1.500 1.750 1.750 1.850 1.750 1.500 RIVERISIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR .100 .150 .094 .170 .075 .075 .070 .070 .070 . .105 .105 .105 .175 .647 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .507 .507 .450 .600 .650 .656 .650 1.500 1.375 1.375 1.422 1.500 1.500 1.008 1.009 1.100 1.500 1.750 1.500 1.700 1.700 1.625 1.500 1.750 1.750 1.850 1.750 1.500 5,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 11,571,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,625,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 2,675,000.00 13,300,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 9,150,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 3,200,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,250,000.00 15,000,000.00 5,863,000.00 79 4, 996, 152.78 14,977,687.50 24, 988,576.39 19,966,377.78 24,987,604.17 24, 988,281.25 49, 979,583.33 24,990,229.17 24,990,131.94 24, 984,687.50 24,985,052.08 24,985,052.08 11,560,987.87 9,991,200.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 9, 998,000.00 5, 998,800.00 5,000,000.00 4,629,301.25 5,000,000.00 4,999,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 2,668,981.25 13,300,000.00 10,000,000.00 9,997,340.00 9,9%,800.00 9,967,700.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 9,150,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 3,200,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,250,000.00 15,000,000.00 5,863,000.00 100.000000 99.940000 99.998000 99.916000 99.976000 99.969000 99.967000 99.969000 99.968000 99.954000 99.954000 99.954000 99.954000 99.761000 100.010000 100.010000 100.010000 100.010000 100.010000 100.010000 100.010000 100.085000 99.761000 99.723000 99.723000 99.723000 100.196000 100.179000 100.171000 100.171000 100.220000 100.237000 99.780000 99.780000 99.780000 100.188000 100.084000 100.188000 99.349000 99.349000 99.814000 100.083000 100.048000 100.048000 100.249000 99.748000 99.581000 5,000,000.00 14,991,000.00 24,999,500.00 19,983,200.00 24,994,000.00 24,992,250.00 49,983,500.00 24,992,250.00 24,992,000.00 24,988,500.00 24,988,500.00 24,988,500.00 11,565,677.34 9,976, JOO.OD 5,000,500.00 5,000,500.00 5,000,500.00 5,000,500.00 5,000,500.00 10,001,000.00 6,000,600.00 5,004,250.00 4,613,946.25 4,986,150.00 4,986,150.00 4,986, 150.00 5,009,800.00 10,017,900.00 5,008,550.00 2,679,574.25 13,329,260.00 10,023,700.00 9,978,000.00 9,978,000.00 9,978,000.00 5,009,400.00 10,008,400.00 9,167,202.00 9,934,900.00 9,934,900.00 9,981,400.00 3,202,656.00 10,004,800.00 10,004,800.00 5,263,072.50 14,962,200.00 5,838,434.03 3,847.22 13,312.50 10,923.61 16,822.22 6,395.83 3,968.75 3,916.67 2,020.83 1,868.06 3,812.50 3,447.92 3,447.92 4,689.47 -15,100.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 3,000.00 1,800.00 4,250.00 -15,355.00 -13,850.00 -12,850.00 -13,850.00 9,800.00 17,900.00 8,550.00 10,593.00 29,260.00 23,700.00 -19,340.00 -18,800.00 10,300.00 9,400.00 8,400.00 17,202.00 -65,100.00 -65,100.00 -18,600.00 2,656.00 4,800.00 4,800.00 13,072.50 -37,800.00 -24,565.97 .005 .522 .090 .629 .369 .342 .367 .342 .350 .459 .459 .459 .454 1.818 1.069 1.069 1.069 1.069 1.069 J.069 1.069 1.03.3 1.819 1.688 1.688 1.688 3.832 3.843 3.840 3.839 3.857 3.857 2.694 2.694 2.693 4.441 4.407 4.441 4.443 4.443 4.494 4.477 4.506 4.506 4.507 4.580 4.687 .005 .523 .090 .630 .370 .342 .367 .342 .351 .460 .460 .460 .455 1.838 1.077 1.077 1.077 J.077 1.077 J.077 1.077 1.0U 1.838 1.707 1.707 1.707 3.967 3.967 3.964 3.964 3.992 3.992 2.748 2.748 2.748 4.641 4.638 4.641 4.660 4.660 4.712 4.679 4.740 4.740 4.751 4.814 ..J..890 7 Month End Portfolio Holdings i\taturif) Yield To PM Book fl.Iarkf't i\larket Unre.lilzed Mod1f1ed Year:. To CUSII' De~cription Date Coupon Maturity \'aim• \'alue Price Value Gain/Loss Duralton 1\lalurity 3134G5NG6 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 11/26/2019 1.750 1.750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.793000 9,979,300.00 -20,700.00 4.671 4 907 3134G5PL1 FHLMC 1YrNc6MoB 12/09/2015 .270 .270 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.889000 24,972,250.00 -27,750.00 .937 :94. 3134G5P66 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 11/26/2019 1.625 1.625 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.839000 14,975,850.00 ·24,150.00 4.687 4.9 3134G5P33 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 11/26/2019 1.750 1.750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.070000 10,007,000.00 7,000.00 4.671 4.907 3134G5NY7 FHLMC 2.25YrNc6MoE 02/28/2017 .750 .750 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.841000 14,976,150.00 -23,850.00 2.140 2164 3134G5PL3 FHLMC 1YrNc6MoE 12/09/2015 .270 .270 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 99.889000 49,944,500.00 -55,500.00 .937 .940 3137EADQ9 FHLMC lYr 05/13/2016 .500 .350 25,000,000.00 25,055,500.00 100.035000 25,008,750.00 -46,750.00 1.361 1.367 3134G5NG6 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 11/26/2019 1.750 1.750 13,080,000.00 13,080,000.00 99.793000 13,052,924.40 -27,075.60 4.671 4.907 3134G5NB7 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 11/20/2019 1.625 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.102000 10,010,200.00 10,200.00 4.671 4.890 3134G5NG6 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 11/26/2019 1.750 1.750 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.793000 4,989,650.00 -10,350.00 4.671 4.907 3134G5P33 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 11/26/2019 1.750 1.760 10,000,000.00 9,995,000.00 100.07CXX)(} 10,007,000.00 12,000.00 4.671 4.907 3134G5SR7 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB 12/24/2019 1.600 1.600 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 99.938000 19,987,600.00 -12,400.00 4.768 4.984 3134G4WC8 FHLMC3YrNc2MoB 05/27/2016 500 .527 15,000,000.00 14,994,000.00 100.Q21000 15,003,150.00 9,150.00 1398 1.405 3134G5SB2 FHLMC 2YrNc3MoB 12/19/2016 .750 .790 15,000,000.00 14,988,000.00 99.741000 14,%1,150.00 -26,850.00 1.948 1.970 3134G5SF3 FHLMC 2.2SY,Nc3MoB 03/24/2017 .850 .909 5,505,000.00 5,497,843.50 99.886000 5,498,724.30 880.80 2.199 2.230 3134GSSUO FHLMC 25YrNc3MoB 06/30/2017 1.000 1.049 9,500,000.00 9,488,600.00 99.802000 9,481,190.00 -7,410.00 2.472 2.499 3134G51J4 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 12/30/2019 1.650 1.650 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.043000 10,004,300.00 4,300.00 4.780 5.000 3134G5TV7 FHLMC 3Y,Nc3MoB 12/26/2017 1.350 1.350 15,700,000.00 15,700,000.00 99.492000 15,620,244.00 -79,756.00 2.917 2.989 3134G5WA9 FHLMC 2Y•NclY•E 12/30/2016 .750 .750 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.934000 24,983,500.00 -16,500.00 1.981 2.000 3134G4TU2 FHLMC 3YrNc1MoE 01/30/2017 .925 .925 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.058000 10,005,800.00 5,800.00 2.048 2.005 3134G5UX1 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 12/30/2019 1.800 1.800 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.104000 10,010,400.00 10,400.00 4.761 5.000 3134 G 5 WL5 FHLMCiilii5yl'INlc3iMloiBlllllll1i21l3iO/l2i01l9llllllllli1i.8i75illlllli1l.8l75illllllllllllii15i'000iii'000ii"i00i11111111111ii15l'000ii'i000ii"00ii111111i100ii·1i29000ilillilillllllllllllii15i'011i1~35ilJQl00illllllllllll191'350ill.100llllllllll4.l75l2lllllllll5l·0001111 313588AW5 FNMA DISC NOTE 313588FNO FNMA DISC NOTE 313588GH2 FNMA DISC NOTE 313588FV2 FNMA DISC NOTE 313588GC3 FNMA DISC NOTE 313588GC3 FNMA DISC N01E 313588GC3 FNMA DISC N01E 3136FP6XO FNMA 5Yr 3136GOUX7 FNMASYrNclYrB 3136GOE64 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136GOE64 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136GOW49 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3135GOQB2 FNMA 3YrNc1YrE 3136G03B5 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G12F5 FNMA SYrNclYrB 3136G1356 FNMA5YrNc1YrB 3136G12F5 FNMA SYrNclYrB 3136G14Q9 FNMA5YrNc1YrB 01/21/2015 05/13/2015 06/01/2015 05/20/2015 05/27/2015 05/27/2015 05/27/2015 D90 .095 .105 .100 .110 .110 .125 .093 .095 .105 .100 .110 .110 .125 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 30,056,000.00 25,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 6,001,000.00 24,989,529.51 24,988,125.00 30,039,519.29 24,987,m.78 19,989,305.56 24,986,631.94 5,997,395.23 99.999000 99.%7000 99.958000 99.965000 99.963000 99.963000 99.%3000 24,999,750.00 24,991,750.00 30,{)'13,376.48 24,991,250.00 19,992,600.00 24,990,750.00 5,998,779.63 10,220.49 3,625.00 3,857.19 3,472.22 3,294.44 4,118.06 1,384.40 24,800.00 -6,350.00 -13,100.00 -13,100.00 -4,200.00 7,437.50 -10,500.00 -29,500.00 -12,250.00 -25,818.40 -80,200.00 -29,400.00 .057 .364 .416 .383 .402 .402 .402 .058 .364 .416 .384 .403 .403 .403 1.096 2.627 2.742 2742 2.858 .800 2.855 2.%7 2.953 2.%7 2.989 2.992 3136G16J3 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1356 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G17E3 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1A66 FNMA5YrNc1YrB 02/04/2016 08/16/2017 09/27/2017 09/27/2017 11/08/2017 10/22/2015 11/07/2017 12/18/2017 12/13/2017 12/18/2017 12/26/2017 12/27/2017 12/13/2017 12/26/2017 12/26/2017 01/30/2018 01/30/2018 01/30/2018 01/29/2018 01/30/2018 01/30/2018 01/30/2018 02/28/2018 02/28/2018 02/28/2018 02/28/2018 02/20/2018 02/28/2018 03/06/2018 03/19/2018 03/19/2018 03/19/2018 03/27/2018 03/27/2018 09/27/2016 09/27/2016 03/19/2018 03/28/2018 03/28/2018 03/20/2018 03/28/2018 09/26/2016 04/24/2018 04/16/2018 04/30/2018 10/25/2016 10/25/2016 10/25/2016 04/16/2018 10/25/2016 11/15/2016 04/18/2018 11/15/2016 05/08/2018 12/27/2016 11/15/2016 11/15/2016 11/15/2016 11/15/2016 11/15/2016 04/30/2018 05/08/2018 .262 .750 .850 .850 .800 .500 .800 .850 .800 .850 .750 .800 .800 .700 .700 .750 .700 .700 .800 .700 .750 .700 .800 1.000 1.000 1.000 .800 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 .800 .342 .750 .850 .850 .800 .489 .800 .850 .800 .850 .750 .800 .800 .700 .700 .750 .700 .700 .800 .700 .750 .700 .800 1.000 1.006 1.000 B26 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.000 1.000 11JOO .800 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,250,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 8,752,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 8,750,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 7,200,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,500,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,500,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,610,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 12,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 21,750,000.00 9,990,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,001,562.50 5,250,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 8,752,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 8,750,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 7,200,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,500,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,998,500.00 10,000,000.00 4,993,750.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,998,750.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,498,350.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,996,250.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,610,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,CXXJ.OO 12,006,600.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 21,750,000.00 100.148000 99.873000 99.738000 99.738000 99.958000 100.180000 99.800000 99.705000 99.755000 99.705000 99.198000 99.412000 99.755000 99.690000 99.629000 99.758000 99.549000 99.724000 99.471000 99.539000 99.659000 99.772000 100.045000 99.810000 99.810000 99.611000 99.778000 99.611000 99.609000 99.624000 99.624000 99.624000 98.928000 99.864000 99.743000 99.743000 99.624000 99.682000 99.662000 99.830000 98.950000 99.573000 99.506000 99.446000 99.653000 99.685000 99.685000 99.685000 99.446000 99.685000 99.588000 99.323000 99.588000 99.459000 99.595000 99.588000 99.588000 99.588000 99.588000 99.588000 99.653000 99.459000 10,014,800.00 4,993,650.00 4,986,900.00 4,986,900.00 9,995,800.00 5,009,000.00 5,239,500.00 9,970,500.00 4,987,750.00 8,726,181.60 9,919,800.00 4,970,600.00 4,987,750.00 8,722,875.00 9,%2,900.00 4,987,900.00 4,977,450.00 7,180,128.00 9,947,100.00 9,953,900.00 4,484,655.00 9,977,200.00 15,006,750.00 9,981,000.00 4,990,500.00 9,961,100.00 4,988,900.00 9,961,100.00 9,960,900.00 4,981,200.00 9,962,400.00 4,981,200.00 4,946,400.00 4,993,200.00 5,485,865.00 4,987,150.00 9,962,400.00 4,984,100.00 4,983,100.00 4,991,500.00 4,947,500.00 4,978,650.00 9, 950,600.00 9,944,600.00 9,965,300.00 4,984,250.00 9,968,500.00 9,968,500.00 4,972,300.00 19,937,000.00 9,958,800.00 5,572,020.30 9,958,800.00 4,972,950.00 11,951,400.00 4,979,400.00 4,979,400.00 4,979,400.00 9,958,800.00 4,979,400.00 4,982,650.00 21,632,332.50 -12,250.00 -27,125.00 -37,100.00 1.089 2587 2.701 2.701 2.815 .805 2.816 2.924 2.909 2.924 2.947 2.954 2.909 2.952 2.950 3.030 3.034 3.034 3.024 3.034 3.030 3.034 3.113 3.099 3.099 3.099 3.082 3.099 3.113 3.149 3.149 3.149 3.197 3.185 1.724 1.724 3.149 3.184 3.187 3.164 3.184 1.721 3.259 3.238 3.282 1.802 1.802 1.802 3.238 1.802 1.858 3.242 1.858 3.2% 1.972 1.858 1.858 1.858 1.858 1.858 3.282 3.2% ~::!. 2.989 3.085 3.005 3.005 3.082 3.005 3.085 3.005 3.164 3.164 3.164 3.164 3.142 3.164 3.181 3.216 3.216 3.216 3.238 3.238 1.742 1.742 3.216 3.241 3.241 3.219 3.241 1.740 3.315 3.293 3.332 1.819 1.819 1.819 3.293 1.819 1.877 3.299 1.877 3.353 1.992 1.877 3136G1B40 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1B32 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1AQ2 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136GlC56 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1AJ8 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1AY5 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1BF5 FNMASYrNclYrB 3136G1D97 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3136G1DA4 FNMASYrNclYrB 3136G1DA4 FNMASYrNclYrB 3136G1DB2 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1CW7 FNMA SYrNclYrB 3136G1DB2 FNMA5YrNc6MoB 3136G1ET2 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1FW4 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1FW4 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1FW4 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1GS2 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1GN3 FNMA5YrNc1YrB 3136G1GR4 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3136G1GR4 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3136G1FW4 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1HC6 FNMASYrNclYrB 3136G1HB8 FNMA5YrNc1YrB 3136G1HE2 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1HP7 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3J35GOVQ3 FNMA 3YrNc6MoB 3136G1JY6 FNMA 5YrNc6MoC 3136G1KB4 FNMA 5YrNc6MoC 3136GIKJ7 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3135GOWL1 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3135GOWL1 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3135GOWl3 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3136G1KB4 FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 3}35GOWL1 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3135GOWS8 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3136G1JWO FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3135GOWS8 FNMA3.5YrNc1YrB 3136G1KW8 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G14F3 FNMA 3.5YrNc6MoB 3135GOWS8 FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrE 3135GOWS8 FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrE 3135GOWS8 FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrE 3135GOWS8 FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrE 3135GOWS8 FNMA 3.SYrNclYrE 3136G1KJ7 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 3136G1KW8 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB .625 .625 1.000 .850 BOO 1.000 1.000 .650 .800 .875 .750 .625 .625 .625 .875 .625 .600 1.000 .600 .900 .680 .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 .750 .900 RIVERISIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR .634 .625 1.000 .850 .800 1.022 1.000 .650 .800 .875 .750 .625 .625 .625 .875 .625 .600 1.000 .600 .900 .665 .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 .750 .900 80 -12,100.00 ~22,550.00 -19,872.00 -52,900.00 -46,100.00 -15,345.00 -22,800.00 6,750.00 -19,000.00 -8,000.00 -38,900.00 -4,850.00 -38,900.00 -39,100.00 -17,550.00 -37,600.00 -18,800.00 -53,600.00 -6,800.00 -12,485.00 -12,850.00 -37,600.00 -15,900.00 -16,900.00 -4,750.00 -52,500.00 -21,350.00 -49,400.00 -55,400.00 -34,700.00 -15,750.00 -31,500.00 -31,500.00 -27,700.00 -63,000.00 -41,200.00 -37,979.70 -41,200.00 -27,050.00 -55,200.00 -20,600.00 -20,600.00 -20,600.00 -41,200.00 -20,600.00 -17,350.00 -117,667.50 ~::~. 1.877 1.877 3.332 3.353 8 Month End Portfolio Holdings Maturity Yield To Par Book Market M.ttket Uruealized Mod1f1ed Years To CUSIP Description Date Coupon Maturity Value Value Price Value Gain/Loss Durahon Maturity 3136G1LT4 •:~ WS8 LT4 3136G1MUO 3135GOKM4 3135GOKM4 3135GOPQO 3135GOKM4 3135GOWJ8 313384FX2 313384GC7 313384GM5 313384GM5 313312GL8 313384HB8 313372KE3 313378AC5 313378U58 313380UF2 313381H24 313381YP4 313382PHO 313382PP2 313382LE1 313382SL8 313380557 313382Y31 3133833M1 3133833)8 3133834MO .3133836N6 313.3836N6 313383CP4 313383CP4 313383CP4 313383CP4 313383EM9 313383EN7 313383EP2 313383G62 •~;: KJ9 3KJ9 3130Al5J3 3130A1AQ1 3130A17)1 3130A1PW2 313378A43 3130A23Z7 3130A23Z7 3130A2AH9 3130A2BX3 3130A2BX3 3130A2DX1 3130A2DZ6 3130A2DZ6 3130A2G75 3130A2U6 3130A2M86 3130A2SG2 3130A2SG2 3130A2SG2 3130A2SG2 3130A2M86 3130A36B5 3130A36B5 3130A34JO 3130A3ES9 3130A3H98 3130A3LC6 3130A3N83 3130A3MT8 3130A3P81 3130A3P81 3130A3QHO 3130A3QP2 3130A3QT4 3130A3Q56 3130A3QU1 3130A3LC6 3130A3RM8 •~~ U9 GE4 313312HM5 FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrB 11/28/2016 .500 .512 10,000,000.00 9,996,000.00 9'J.471000 9,947,100.00 -48,900.00 1.8% FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrB 11/15/2016 .600 .600 3,635,cro.oo 3,635,000.00 99.588000 3,620,023.80 -14,976.20 1.858 FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrB 11/15/2016 .600 .604 10,000,000.00 9,998,500.00 99.588000 9,958,800.00 -39,700.00 1.858 FNMA 3.SYrNclYrB 11/15/2016 .600 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.588000 9,958,800.00 -41,200.00 1.858 FNMA 3.5YrNc1YrB 11/28/2016 .500 1.009 752,000.00 739,216.00 99.471000 748,021.92 8,805.92 1.891 FNMA 5YrNc6MoB 06/12/2018 .850 1.077 10,000,000.00 9,911,500.00 99.647000 9,964,700.00 53,200.00 3.387 FNMA 1Yr 05/27/2015 .500 .182 20,000,000.00 20,078,200.00 100.112000 20,022,400.00 -55,800.00 .402 FNMA 1.25Yr 05/27/2015 .500 .157 20,000,000.00 20,084,102.60 100.112000 20,022,400.00 -61,702.60 .402 FNMA 3.5Yr 10/26/2017 .875 1.141 10,000,000.00 9,905,700.00 99.155000 9,915,500.00 9,800.00 2.m FNMA 1Yr 05/27/2015 .SOD .119 25,000,000.00 25,100,000.00 100.112000 25,028,000.00 -72,000.00 .402 1.912 1.877 1.877 1.877 1.912 3.449 .403 .403 2.822 .403 3.389 FNMA 4y, 05/21/2018 .875 1.3% 15,000,000.00 14,701,500.00 98.337000 14,750,550.00 49,050.00 3.320 llllllllllllliiiiiilllllllillllllilllll.aiiiil11111111iiiliiimlliiiillll .. iillllllllllllill'llll'lll ... FHLB DISC NOTE FHLB DISC NOTE FHLB DISC NOTE FHLB DISC NOTE FHLB DISC NOTE FHLB DISC NOTE FHLB4Yr FHLB3Yr FHLB3Yr FHLB SYrNc3MoB FHLB3Yr FHLB2Yr FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB flILB 3.5YrNc3MoB FHLB 3.5YrNc3MoB FHLB 4YrNc3MoA FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 5YrNC3MoB FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB5YrNc1YrB FHLB5YrNc1YrB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB SYrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 3.SYrNclMoB FHLB 3.SYrNclMoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 3YrNc6MoB FHLB 3.5YrNc6MoE FHLB 3.25YrNc3MoB FHLB9Mo FHLB3.75Yr FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 1YrNc9MoB FHLB 1YrNc6MoB FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 1YrNc7MoB FHLB 1YrNc7MoB FHLB 1YrNc7MoB FHLB 1YrNc7MoB FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 1YrNc6MoB FHLB 1YrNc6MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB 1YrNc3MoB FHLB 5YrNc3MoB FHLB3Yr FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 1Yr FHLB lYr FHLB 1YrNc6MoE FHLB 1YrNc7MoB FHLB 2YrNc3MoB FHLB 1YrNc6MoE FHLB 2YrNc1YrE FHLB 5YrNc6MoB FHLB 2YrNc6MoE FFCB DISC NOTE FFCB DISC NOTE FFCB DISC NOTE FFCB DISC NOTE FFCB DISC NOTE 05/22/2015 05/27/2015 06/05/2015 06/05/2015 06/04/2015 06/19/2015 02/04/2015 05/22/2015 05/04/2015 10/10/2017 01/16/2015 02/20/2015 04/25/2018 04/25/2018 10/11/2016 10/24/2016 10/11/2016 05/21/2018 05/23/2018 05/25/2018 05/29/2018 06/12/2018 06/12/2018 06/19/2018 06/19/2018 06/19/2018 06/19/2018 06/20/2018 06/20/2018 06/20/2018 12/19/2016 12/19/2016 06/27/2018 06/27/2018 06/27/2018 03/24/2017 09/26/2017 06/27/2017 01/22/2015 03/09/2018 06/18/2019 06/18/2019 06/26/2019 06/26/2019 06/26/2019 07/09/2019 07/09/2019 07/09/2019 07/17/2015 08/03/2015 07/30/2019 08/27/2015 08/27/2015 08/27/2015 08/27/2015 07/30/2019 10/20/2015 10/20/2015 10/09/2019 11/20/2019 12/07/2015 12/19/2019 12/29/2017 12/30/2019 01/29/2016 01/29/2016 01/06/2016 01/06/2016 12/30/2016 12/30/2015 12/30/2016 12/19/2019 12/30/2016 05/07/2015 05/19/2015 05/19/2015 05/29/2015 06/29/2015 .110 .125 .110 .133 .120 .185 .172 500 .700 .625 .250 .250 .900 .850 .625 .550 .700 .750 .750 .750 .750 .800 .800 .875 .875 .875 .875 .900 1.000 1.250 .750 .750 1.250 1.250 1.250 .900 1.050 1.050 .090 1.375 1500 1.500 1.500 1.625 1.625 1.000 1.750 1.750 .200 .230 1.500 .250 .250 .250 .250 1.500 .270 .270 1.875 1.625 .250 1.800 1.050 1.500 .250 .250 .300 .310 .875 .300 .750 1.800 .770 .070 .070 .070 .082 .120 .110 .125 .111 .133 .120 .185 .172 500 .700 .625 .307 .293 .900 .850 .625 .550 .700 .750 .750 .750 .750 .800 .800 .875 .875 .875 .875 .908 1.000 1.250 .750 .750 1.250 1.250 1.250 .900 1.050 1.058 .113 1.330 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.625 1.625 1.000 1.750 1.760 .200 .230 1.500 .250 .250 .250 .250 1.531 .270 .270 1.875 1.625 .250 1.800 1.050 1500 .250 .250 .300 .310 .875 .300 .750 1.800 .770 .070 .070 .070 .082 .120 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 26,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 59,100,000.00 15,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 8,350,000.00 9,400,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,285,714.00 12,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 5,040,000.00 4,200,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,250,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12,500,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 24, 986,326.39 24,984,201.39 25,985,440.00 24,983,190.28 24,984,916.67 59,044,725.08 15,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,994,000.00 4,995,550.00 10,000,000.00 8,350,000.00 9,400,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,285,714.00 12,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,998,000.00 13,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 24,995,784.75 7,011,690.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 5,040,000.00 4,200,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,247,375.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,992,500.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 )0,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12,500,000.00 14,994,050.00 24,989,548.61 24,989,548.61 24,987,244.44 24,981,333.33 99.972583 99.971611 99.969861 99.969861 99.970056 99.%7139 100.009000 100.125000 100.168000 100.009000 100.003000 100.003000 99.481000 99.690000 99.764000 99.659000 99.454000 99.267000 99.194000 99.358000 99.308000 99.477000 99.477000 98.933000 98.933000 98.933000 98.933000 99.034000 99.348000 98.946000 99.566000 99.566000 99.770000 99.770000 99.770000 99.891000 99.719000 99.775000 99.997000 100.243000 100.168000 100.168000 101.425000 100.251000 100.251000 100.018000 99.922000 99.922000 99.%8000 99.948000 100.111000 99.939000 99.939000 99.939000 99.939000 100.111000 99.911000 99.911000 100.033000 99.984000 99.906000 100.013000 99.691000 100.006000 99.896000 99.896000 99.975000 99.959000 99.981000 99.960000 99.845000 100.013000 99.886000 99.%8000 99.%5000 99.%5000 99.963000 99.951000 24,993,145.83 24,992,90278 25,992,163.89 24,992,465.28 24,992,513.89 59,080,579.08 15,001,350.00 5,006,250.00 15,025,200.00 10,000,900.00 5,000,150.00 5,000,150.00 9,948,100.00 8,324,115.00 9,377,816.00 9,965,91Xl.OO 4,262,314.00 11,912,040.00 9,919,400.00 9,935,800.00 4,965,400.00 9,947,700.00 9,947,700.00 4,946,650.00 4,946,650.00 4,946,650.00 9,893,300.00 4,951,700.00 12,915,240.00 9,894,600.00 4,978,300.00 9,956,600.00 4;988,500.00 4,988,500.00 4,988,500.00 4,994,550.00 4,985,950.00 9,977,500.00 24,999,250.00 7,017,010.00 10,016,800.00 15,025,200.00 8,114,000.00 5,052,650.40 4,210,542.00 10,001,800.00 4,996,100.00 5,245,905.00 24,992,000.00 24,987,000.00 10,011,100.00 49,969,500.00 9,993,900.00 9,993,900.00 4,996,950.00 5,005,550.00 24,977,750.00 24,977,750.00 10,003,300.00 14,997,600.00 24,976,500.00 5,000,650.00 9,969,100.00 10,000,600.00 14,984,400.00 24,974,000.00 14,996,250.00 24,989,750.00 9,998,100.00 24,990,000.00 6,989,150.00 10,CXH,300.00 12,485,750.00 14,995,200.00 24,991,250.00 24,991,250.00 24,990,750.00 24,987,750.00 6,819.44 8,701.39 6,723.89 9,275.00 7,597.22 35,854.00 1,350.00 6,250.00 25,200.00 900.00 6,150.00 4,600.00 -51,900.00 -25,885.00 -22,184.00 -34,100.00 -23,400.00 -87,960.00 -80,600.00 -64,200.00 -34,600.00 -52,300.00 -52,300.00 -53,350.00 -53,350.00 -53,350.00 -106,700.00 -46,300.00 -84,760.00 -105,400.00 -21,700.00 -43,400.00 -11,500.00 -11,500.00 -11,500.00 -5,450.00 -14,050.00 -20,000.00 3,465.25 5,320.00 16,800.00 25,200.00 114,000.00 12,650.40 10,542.00 1,800.00 -3,900.00 -1,470.00 -8,000.00 -13,000.00 11,100.00 -30,500.00 -6,100.00 -6,100.00 -3,050.00 13,050.00 -22,250.00 -22,250.00 3,300.00 -2,400.00 -23,500.00 650.00 -30,900.00 600.00 -15,600.00 -26,000.00 -3,750.00 -10,250.00 -1,900.00 -10,000.00 -10,850.00 1,300.00 -14,250.00 1,150.00 1,701.39 1,701.39 3,505.56 6,416.67 .388 .402 .427 .427 .424 .465 .096 .388 .338 2.743 .044 .139 3.260 3.259 1.763 1.801 1.761 3.337 3.343 3.348 3.360 3.392 3.392 3.406 3.406 3.406 3.406 3.407 3.401 3.384 1.948 1.948 3.403 3.403 3.403 2.198 2.683 2.450 .060 3.097 4.300 4.300 4.322 4.309 4.309 4.390 4.294 4.294 .543 588 4.383 .654 .654 .654 .654 4.383 .801 .801 4.526 4.671 .932 4.728 2.940 4.800 1.075 1.075 1.DlO 1.010 1.978 .998 1.981 4.728 1.981 .347 .380 .380 .408 .492 . 389 .403 .427 .427 .425 .466 .0% .389 .340 2.778 .044 .140 3.318 3.318 1.781 1.816 1.781 3.389 3.395 3.400 3.411 3.449 3.449 3.468 3.468 3.468 3.468 3.471 3.471 3.471 1.970 1.970 3.490 3.490 3.490 2.230 2.740 2.490 .060 3.189 4.466 4.466 4.488 4.488 4.488 4.523 4.523 4.523 .542 .589 4.581 .655 .655 .655 .655 4.581 .803 .803 4.775 4.890 .934 4.970 2.997 5.000 1.079 1.079 1.016 1.016 2.000 .997 2.000 4.970 2.000 .348 .381 .381 .408 .493 RIVERISIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 81 9 Month End Portfolio Holdings l\14.tunt} Yield To P.tr Book Market Market Unrc.tl1zed tiodtfu~d Year" To CUSIP Descriptrnn Date Coupon Matunt}' Value \'Jlue Price Value Garn/Loss Duration Maturity 313312HA1 FFCB DISC NOTE 313312GE4 FFCB DISC NOTE 313396HY2 FFCB DISC NOTE 06/18/2015 05/29/2015 07/10/2015 .110 .110 .170 .110 .110 .170 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 15,061,000.00 24,983,958.33 24, 986,631. 94 15,046,562.36 99.954000 99.963000 99.940000 24, 988,500.00 24, 990,750.00 15,051,963.40 4,541.67 4,118.06 5,401.04 .462 .407 .522 31331KHVS FFCB 5Yr 04/20/2016 .235 .273 10,000,000.00 9,995,000.00 100.159000 10,015,900.00 20,900.00 1.300 1.304 3133EANJ3 FFCB 3Yr 05/01/2015 .500 .520 5,000,000.00 4,997,000.00 100.069000 5,1Xl3,450.00 6,450.00 .330 _':\32 3133ECBA1 FFCB2.5Yr 07/24/2015 .207 .252 15,000,000.00 14,996,061.75 100.062000 15,009,300.00 13,238.25 .563 .562 3133ECCE2 FFCB 2Y• 01/07 /2015 .250 .306 10,000,000.00 9,988,850.00 100.002000 10,000,200.00 11,350.00 .019 .019 3133ECCE2 FFCB2Y• 01/07/2015 .250 .281 15,000,000.00 14,991,750.00 !00.002000 15,000,300.00 8,550.00 .019 .019 3133ECKZ6 FFCB 3YrNc1YrC 04/11/2016 .430 .469 5,000,000.00 4,994,250.00 99.919000 4,995,950.00 1,700.00 1.272 1.279 3133ED7H9 FFCB 1.25Yr 02/13/2015 .190 .205 25,000,000.00 24,995,300.00 100.005000 25,001,250.00 5,950.00 .120 .121 3!33ED7H9 FFCB l.25Y• 02/13/2015 .190 .203 25,000,000.00 24,996,000.00 !00.005000 25,001,250.00 5,250.00 .120 .121 3133EDAL6 FFCB l.75Y• 08/25/2015 .280 .280 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.996000 14,999,400.00 -600.00 .648 .649 3!33ED7H9 FFCB l.25Y, 02/13/2015 .190 .203 25,000,000.00 24,996,075.00 !00.005000 25,001,250.00 5,175.00 .120 .121 3133EDBK7 FFCB 3Y•NC1Y•A 12/09/2016 .680 .731 5,000,000.00 4,992,500.00 99.682000 4,984,100.00 -8,400.00 1.922 1.942 3133EDDRO FFCB lYr 01/16/2015 .160 .160 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.001000 25,000,250.00 250.00 .044 .044 3133EDDRO FFCB lY• 01/16/201S .160 .160 lS,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.001000 !S,000,!S0.00 150.00 .044 .044 3J33EDEK4 FFCB lY• 09/10/201S .250 270 10,000,000.00 9,9%,800.00 99.990000 9,999,000.00 2,200.00 .690 .693 3133EDG63 FFCB2Yr 03/03/2016 .375 .370 10,000,000.00 10,001,000.00 99.871000 9,987,100.00 -13,900.00 1.167 1.173 3133EDGB2 FFCB l.25Yr 06/04/201S .190 .193 15,000,000.00 14,999,47S.OO 100.005000 IS,000,750.00 1,275.00 .424 .425 3!33EANJ3 FFCB 12SY' 05/01/201S .500 .178 lS,000,000.00 1S,055,S45.00 J00.069000 lS,010,350.00 -45,195.00 .331 .332 3!33EDGB2 FFCB 12SY' 06/04/20!S .190 .188 20,000,000.00 20,000,600.00 !00.005000 20,001,000.00 400.00 .424 .425 3133EDGB2 FFCB l.25Y' 06/04/201S .190 .190 lS,000,000.00 IS,000,000.00 !00.005000 1S,000,7SO.OO 750.00 .424 .425 3133EDES7 FFCB lY• 06/10/201S 230 .225 15,000,000.00 JS,000,900.00 100.006000 !S,000,900.00 0.00 .440 .441 3133EDGB2 FFCB 12SY, 06/04/201S .190 .162 !S,000,000.00 15,004,770.00 J00.005000 lS,000,750.00 -4,020.00 .424 .425 3133EDKV3 FFCB lY• 05/01/20!S .130 .134 lS,000,000.00 14,999,367.90 99.%6000 14,994,900.00 -4,467.90 .331 .332 3133EDFD9 FFCB l.25Y' 05/14/2015 .190 .190 33,150,000.00 33,150,000.00 99.975000 33,141,712.50 -8,287.50 .367 .367 3!33EDQ70 FFCB !Yr 07/09/201S .150 .163 10,000,000.00 9,998,700.00 99.954000 9,995,400.00 -3,300.00 .S21 .521 3133EDRV6 FFCB 1Y• 08/04/201S .190 .190 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.918000 24,979,500.00 -20,500.00 .591 .592 3133EDTB8 FFCB lY• 08/21/201S .180 .180 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.977000 24,994,250.00 -5,750.00 .638 .638 3133EDKW1 FFCB 1.25Yr 08/05/2015 .180 .172 4,000,000.00 4,000,262.00 99.960000 3,998,400.00 -1,862.00 .593 .595 3!33EDWP3 FFCB IY' 10/0l/201S .190 .198 20,000,000.00 19,998,400.00 99.913000 19,982,600.00 -lS,800.00 .749 .751 3J33EDXQO FFCB 5y, 10/10/2019 .232 .232 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.021000 IS,003,150.00 3,150.00 4.749 4.778 3133EDXQO FFCB 5y, 10/10/2019 .232 .232 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.021000 25,005,250.00 S,250.00 4.749 4.778 3133EDN40 FFCB l.25Y• 01/11/2016 .270 .218 25,000,000.00 25,016,250.00 99.985000 24,996,250.00 -20,000.00 1.026 1.030 3133EDXQO FFCB 5y, 10/10/2019 .232 .237 10,000,000.00 9,997,560.00 J00.021000 10,002,100.00 4,540.00 4.748 4.778 3!33EDZX3 FFCB l.2SY• 01/29/2016 .230 .250 10,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 99.846000 9,984,600.00 -12,900.00 1.075 1.079 3133EDZX3 FFCB 1.2SY• 01/29/2016 .230 .250 lS,000,000.00 14,996,250.00 99.846000 14,976,900.00 -19,350.00 1.075 1.079 3!33EDZX3 FFCB l.25Y• 01/29/2016 .230 .230 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.846000 24,%1,500.00 -38,SOO.OO 1.076 1.079 3133EEECO FFCB IY• 01/04/2016 220 .220 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.942000 24,985,500.00 -14,500.00 1.006 1.011 3133 EDZ4? FFCBllYR,llllllllllM0111l22i1l20iiii16llllll1i23ii011lllii.23i0illllllllli1si,07iiii~l000ii.00illllllllli1sl,07iii~l000iii.ooiJllllll991.9i29000iiillllllllli1si,05i-l~i300ij.30ii1lllllli-1i~i6991i.7D011111i1i.056illllllii1.i060i 31315PQK8 FAMCA 3Yr 31315PWS4 FAMCA 2Yr 31315PYY9 FAMCA 3Yr 31315PRT8 FAMCA 5YrNc6MoB 31315PJ59 FAMCA 2Yr 31315PW54 FAMCA lYr 31315P2B4 FAMCA 1Yr 31315PU49 FAMCA 1.25Yr 31315P3J6 FAMCA lYr 31315PJ75 FAMCA 1.5Yr 31315P2K4 FAMCA 3Yr 31315P5R6 FAMCA 5YrNc6MoB 31315PSX3 FAMCA 5YrNc6MoB 31315PG60 FAMCA 5YrNc6MoB 31315PG60 FAMCA 5YrNc6MoB 31315PS42 FAMCA 5YrNc6MoB 31315PV48 FAMCA 5YrNc6MoB 05/11/20!S 07/02/2015 Ol/23/201S 01/28/2016 04/03/2018 01/06/2015 01/15/2015 02/03/201S 06/29/201S 06/30/2015 01/25/2016 09/05/2017 10/17/2019 11/04/2019 12/02/2019 12/02/2019 12/10/2019 12/23/2019 04/07 201S 546415L73 LOUISIANA STATE 05/15/2016 93974DDYI WASHINGTON STATE 02/01/2015 546415527 LOUISIANA STATE 02/01/2015 S6052AXR2 MAINE STATE 06/0l/201S 882723PH6 TEXASSTATE 10/01/2015 93974DHP6 WASHINGTON STATE 08/01/2015 76914AAG7 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 10/14/2015 COMM PAPER 74271UN71 PROCTER & GAMBLE 91411UNG6 UC REGENTS 01/07/201S 01/16/2015 64105HNMO NESTLE 01/21/2015 89233HNG5 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 01/16/2015 19121BNU9 COCA-COLA CO 19121BNN5 COCA-COLA CO 36959JP64 GE CAPITAL CORP 16677KND1 CHEVRON 16677KNM1 CHEVRON 91411UNG6 UC REGENTS 16677KNT6 CHEVRON 36959JQ63 GE CAPITAL CORP 19121BQ69 COCA-COLA CO 36959JQG1 GECAPITALCORP 19121BPC7 COCA-COLA CO 01/28/2015 01/22/20JS 02/06/2015 01/13/2015 01/21/2015 01/16/2015 01/27/2015 03/06/201S 03/06/2015 03/16/2015 02/12/2015 .130 .sso .320 .425 .875 .185 .190 .185 .170 .178 .365 1.120 1.875 1.850 1.750 1.750 1.625 1.750 .!4S .540 .200 220 .200 .210 .150 .350 .140 .150 .110 .180 .140 .140 .130 .JOO .100 .090 .090 .120 .125 .130 .100 RIVERISIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR .130 .587 .320 .42S .875 .190 .195 .190 .170 .178 .370 1.120 1.875 1.850 1.750 1.750 1.625 1.750 .145 .540 .200 .251 .220 .210 .230 .350 .140 .150 .110 .180 .140 .140 .130 .JOO .100 .090 .090 .120 .125 .130 .100 25,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 8,850,CXXJ.OO 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 38,450,000.00 12,070,000.00 11,590,000.00 24,755,000.00 11,295,000.00 12,465,000.00 8,335,IXXJ.00 690,000.00 35,000,000.00 5,500,000.00 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 12,200,000.00 50,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 82 24,974,993.06 9,989,000.00 5,000,000.00 S,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 49,997,294.50 24,998,750.00 24,998,750.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 24, 998,000.00 8,850,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 38,432,499.91 12,070,000.00 11,590,000.00 24,747,821.05 11,292,853.95 12,465,000.00 8,327, 915.25 690,000.00 34,979,719.44 5,4%,631.25 49,977,236.00 49, 966,250.00 24, 986,583.33 29, 985,066.67 19, 991,694.44 12,1%,950.00 49,987,083.33 19, 996,000.00 19, 995,500.00 29, 988,000.00 49,979,340.50 24,988,986.11 19,995,166.67 99.967000 100.124000 100.011000 99.903000 99.449000 100.001000 100.002000 100JXl4000 99.975000 99.980000 100.013000 100.113000 98.938000 100.199000 99.878000 99.878000 99.736000 100.288000 99.961333 100.000000 100.00CXJOO 99.971000 99.981000 100.000000 99.915000 100.000000 99.997500 99.993750 99.991667 99.993750 99.988750 99.991250 99.985000 99.995000 99.991667 99.993750 99.989167 99.966222 99.966222 99.960944 99.982500 24,991,750.00 10,012,400.00 5,000,550.00 4,995,150.00 9,944,900.00 50,000,500.00 2S,000,500.00 25,001,000.00 24,993,750.00 24,995,000.00 25,003,250.00 8,860,000.50 9,893,800.00 lS,029,850.00 14,981,700.00 9,987,800.00 14,960,400.00 15,043,200.00 38,435,132.67 12,070,000.00 11,590,000.00 24,747,821.05 11,292,853.95 12,465,000.00 8,327,915.25 690,000.00 34,999,125.00 5,499,656.25 49,995,833.33 49,996,875.00 24,997,187.50 29,997,375.00 19,997,000.00 12,199,390.00 49, 995,833.33 19,998,750.00 19,997,833.33 29,989,866.67 49,983,111.11 24,990,236.11 19,996,500.00 16,756.94 23,400.00 S50.00 -4,850.00 -55,100.00 3,205.50 1,750.00 2,250.00 -6,250.00 -5,000.00 5,250.00 10,000.50 -106,200.00 29,850.00 -18,300.00 -12,200.00 -39,600.00 43,200.00 2,632.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,405.56 3,025.00 18,597.33 30,625.00 10,604.17 12,308.33 S,305.56 2,440.00 8,750.00 2,750.00 2,333.33 1,866.67 3,770.61 1,250.00 1,333.33 .358 .500 .063 1.070 3.202 .016 .041 D93 .492 .495 1.062 2.622 4.548 4.598 4.688 4.688 4.726 4.746 265 1.365 .088 .088 .416 .749 .582 .783 .019 .044 .057 .044 .077 .060 .101 .036 .057 .044 .074 .178 .178 .205 .118 .359 .501 .063 1.077 3.258 .016 .04] .093 .493 .4% 1.068 2.682 4.797 4.847 4.923 4.923 4.945 4.981 266 1.373 .088 .088 .416 .751 .584 .786 .019 .044 .058 .044 .077 .060 .101 .036 .058 .044 .074 .178 .178 .205 .118 • 10 Month End Portfolio Holdings Maturity Yield To Par Book Market Market Unrealized Mod1f1ed Years To CUSIP Description Date Coupon Maturity Value Value Price Value GainjLoo;s Duration Maturity 91411UQQ1 UC REGENTS 03/24/2015 .125 .125 22,000,000.00 21,990,298.61 99.956722 21, 990,478.89 180.28 .227 .TZJ .~6 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 03/18/2015 .170 .170 25,000,000.00 24,985,833.33 99.959889 24,989,972.22 4,138.89 QSS GE CAPITAL CORP 03/26/2015 .140 .140 20,000,000.00 19,990,588.89 99.955667 19,991,133.33 544.44 Q24 UC REGENTS 03/02/2015 .180 .180 25,000,000.00 24,988,750.00 99.968333 24, 992,083.33 3,333.33 NT6 CHEVRON 01/27/2015 .080 .080 50,000,000.00 49, 993,888.89 99.989167 49, 994,583.33 694.44 .210 .211 .232 .233 .167 .167 .074 .074 19121BRD3 COCA-COLA CO 04/13/2015 .150 .150 25,000,000.00 24,986,562.50 99.940500 24,985,125.00 -1,437.50 .282 .282 89233HR63 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 04/06/2015 .180 .180 25,000,000.00 24,984,750.00 99.944583 24,986,145.83 1,395.83 .262 .263 36959JRD7 GE CAPITAL CORP 04/13/2015 .170 .170 40,000,000.00 39,976,955.56 99.940500 39,976,200.00 -755.56 .282 .282 89233HRH9 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP .200 .292 .293 • • RIVERISIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 83 11 " " " Full Compliance The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in FULL COMPLIANCE with the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy. The County's Investment Policy is more restrictive than the Califor- nia Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. MUNICIPAL BOND$;i . (MUNI) I U.S. TREASURIES i I NA ILOc::AiAGENcY~~~~1 r~ffi:A~""NOi:IMfr-~N~A~l loBUGATIONS (LAO" \ � 1 1 ! FEDERAL AGENCIES 270DAYS 40% iCERTIFICATE & TIME jDEPOSITS (NCD & TCD) tRi!PURCJ.iASE--.--~--,lilYE:~;-N(jlUJ\AIT--,~NUA~l mt :cA.i~T-R~U~STSSHH�omR~T~Tfiill:M""l~""N:~~~NA~-~~-1 !FUND IKi5NEY MAAR:Ri<KJ1ETnlfffruf\rl riIBI>A~?Sli>22iro0%%~-11A:AA:AA:/1'AA~aa~ l I FUNDS (MMF) rioCAL~AGENCY~--~--l NA NA ! INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) ! I CASH/DEPOSIT.ACCOUNT I ;.........~~��-����~----��-~-....; tM""~>=�>>'~"""'~~--'-'~~' -'"'" "'=~~'=�~<M~>~" ~i �����������-��~-���~" ooo" " o" " " -~���~~OOO" " ���� 1 Mutual Funds maturihj may be interpreted as weighted average maturity not exceeding 60 days. 20% AA/ Aa2/ 2 Or must have an investment advisor with not less than 5 years experience and with assets under management of $500,000,000 . THIS COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53646 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 84 13 Tara Byerly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Importance: Tara Byerly Thursday, March 12, 2015 8:58 AM Tara Byerly Jennifer Harmon; Theresia Trevino; STANDIFO; Anne Mayer; 'steven.debaun@bbklaw.com' SD.Quarterly Investment Report Follow up Logan Circle_RCTC Fourth Quarter Review_01292015.pdf High Good morning Commissioners, Attached please find the Fourth Quarter Summary report from Logan Circle, the Commission's investment manager of the 91 Bond proceeds, which was omitted from the staff report. The form of this report will be included in future quarterly investment reports. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara Byerly RCTC 1 LOGANCIRCLE p A R T N E R Riverside County Transportation Commission SHORT DURATION Fourth Quarter 2014 Review Logan Circle Partners, L.P. 111 25 Deforest Avenue Summit, NJ 07901 111 908-376-0550 5 PORTFOLIO REVIEW -Construction Fund Portfo lio Characteristics As of July 11, 2013 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 0.67% Duration 1.48 Years Average Quality (Moody's) A1 As of December 31, 2014 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 0.31% Duration 0.08 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aa1 Portfolio Performance 1 4Q 2014 Total Construction Fund (Gross of Fees) 0.08% Total Construction Fund (Net of Fees) 0.05% Citigroup 3-Month Treasury Bill 0.00% 2014 0.39% 0.30% 0.03% Asset Allocation Municipal 4% ABS Corporate 53% ABS 4% CP 86% Municipal 10% Since Inception CP 30% Since Inception (Annualized) (Cumulative) 0.43% 0.65% 0.34% 0.52% 0.03% 0.05% Past Performance is not indicative of future results . Performance returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. The performance benchmark for the Riverside County Construction Fund is the Citigroup 3-Month Treasury Bill, which tracks the return of one three-month Treasury bill until maturity. 1 LOGAN CIRCLE P \ R T ~ F R S PORTFOLIO REVIEW -Capitalized Interest Fund Portfolio Characteristics Asset Allocation ABS As of July 11, 2013 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.00% RMBS 5% Duration 2.39 Years Municipal 3% Average Quality (Moody's) Aa1 Corporate 31% As of December 31, 2014 RMBS CMBS 13% ABS 1% Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 0.77% Duration 1.14 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa Portfolio Performance 1 Total Capitalized Interest Fund (Gross of Fees) Total Capitalized Interest Fund (Net of Fees) B of A ML U.S. Treasury Index 1-3 Year B of A ML U.S. Treasury Index 0-2 Year 4Q 2014 0.14% 0.12% 0.17% 0.01% Agency 1% Municipal 7% 2014 1.06% 0.96% 0.62% 0.25% Corporate 33% Since Inception (Annualized) 1.28% 1.17% 0.65% 0.28% 7% Since Inception (Cumulative) 1.92% 1.77% 0.97% 0.43% Past Performance is not indicative of future results . Performance returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. The performance benchmark for the Riverside County Capitalized Interest Fund is the Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Treasury 1-3 Year, which is a broad-based index consisting of U.S. Treasury securities with an outstanding par greater or equal to $25 million and a maturity range from one to three years , inclusive , reflecting total return . The Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S . 0-2 Year Treasury Index is a broad based index that measures short-term Treasury Notes and Bonds with a maturity range between zero and two years , and is presented for discussion purposes only. 2 LOGAN C I RC LE p R T F R PORTFOLIO REVIEW -Debt Reserve Fund Portfolio Characteristics Asset Allocation As of July 11, 2013 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.98% Duration 5.04 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa As of December 31, 2014 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.57% Duration 4.03 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa Since Since Portfolio Performance 1 4Q 2014 2014 Inception Inception (Annualized) (Cumulative) Total Debt Service Fund (Gross of Fees) 1.35% 4.31% 2.96% 4.47% Total Debt Service Fund (Net of Fees) 1.33% 4.21% 2.86% 4.33% B of A ML U.S . Treasury Index 3-7 Year 1.27% 3.13% 2.04% 3.07% Past Performance is not indicative of future results . Performance returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. The performance benchmark for the Riverside County Capitalized Interest Fund is the Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Treasury 3-7 Year, which is a broad-based index consisting of U.S . Treasury securities with an outstanding par greater or equal to $25 million and a maturity range from three to seven years , inclusive , reflecting total return . 3 LOGAN CIRCLE P\RT'\F R'> PORTFOLIO REVIEW Portfolio Market Value Portfolio Construction (Sales Tax) Construction (Toll Revenue) Total Construction Funds Portfolio Capitalized Interest (Sales Tax) Capitalized Interest (Toll Revenue) Total Capitalized Interest Funds Portfolio Debt Service Reserve Fund 4 Market Value (7/3/2013) $332,687,595 $122, 120,571 $454,808, 167 Market Value (7/3/2013) $103,683,353 $31,416,498 $135,099,851 Market Value (7/3/2013) $17,667,869 Net Outflows ($223,838,243) ($77,894,607) ($301,732,850) Net Outflows ($33,924 ,680) ($10,047 ,023) ($43,971, 703) Net Outflows $0 Market Value (12/31/2014) $110,731,369 $44,500,257 $155,231,626 Market Value (12/31/2014) $71,625,776 $21,979,743 $93,605,519 Market Value (12/31/2014) $18,456,739 Change in Market Value +$1,882,017 +$274,293 +$2, 156,310 Change in Market Value +$1,867, 103 +$610,268 +$2,477,371 Change in Market Value +$788,870 LOGAN C I PC l.E P \ R T ~ F R \ 5 DISCLAIMERS In general. This disclaimer applies to this document and the verbal or written comments of any person presenting it. This document, taken together with any such verbal or written comments, is referred to herein as the "Presentation." Logan Circle Partners, LP., a Fortress Investment Group LLC company, is referred to herein as "Logan Circle". No offer to purchase or sell securities. This Presentation is being provided to you at your specific request. This Presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security and may not be relied upon in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. Projections. Projections contained in this Presentation are based on a variety of estimates and assumptions by Logan Circle, including, among others, estimates of future operating results, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, and the timing and manner of disposition or other realization events. These estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and are subject to numerous business, industry, market, regulatory, competitive and financial risks that are outside of Logan Circle's control. There can be no assurance that the assumptions made in connection with the projections will prove accurate, and actual results may differ materially, including the possibility that an investor may lose some or all of its invested capital. The inclusion of the projections herein should not be regarded as an indication that Logan Circle or any of its affiliates considers the projections to be a reliable prediction of future events and the projections should not be relied upon as such. Neither Logan Circle nor any of its affiliates or representatives has made or makes any representation to any person regarding the projections and none of them intends to update or otherwise revise the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date when made or to reflect the occurrence of future events, if any or all of the assumptions underlying the projections are later shown to be in error. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "projections" includes "targeted returns". Past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results and should not be relied upon as the basis for making an investment decision. The information presented is only available for institutional client use and is presented for use only as a one-on-one presentation. No reliance, no update and use of information. You may not rely on this Presentation as the basis upon which to make an investment decision. To the extent that you rely on this Presentation in connection with any investment decision, you do so at your own risk. This Presentation is being provided in summary fashion and does not purport to be complete. The information in the Presentation is provided to you as of the dates indicated and Logan Circle does not intend to update the information after its distribution, even in the event that the information becomes materially inaccurate. Certain information contained in this Presentation, includes performance and characteristics of Logan Circle's strategies and any represented benchmarks, which may derive from calculations or figures that have been provided by independent third parties, or have been prepared internally and have not been audited or verified. Use of different methods for preparing, calculating or presenting information may lead to different results for the information presented, compared to publicly quoted information, and such differences may be material. Knowledge and experience. You acknowledge that you are knowledgeable and experienced with respect to the financial, tax and business aspects of this Presentation and that you will conduct your own independent financial, business, regulatory, accounting, legal and tax investigations with respect to the accuracy, completeness and suitability of this Presentation should you choose to use or rely on this Presentation, at your own risk, for any purpose. Risk of loss. An investment in the strategy will be highly speculative and there can be no assurance that the strategy's investment objectives will be achieved. Investors must be prepared to bear the risk of a total loss of their investment. Distribution of this Presentation. Logan Circle expressly prohibits any reproduction, in hard-copy, electronic or any other form, or any redistribution to any third party of this Presentation without the prior written consent of Logan Circle. This Presentation is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use is contrary to local law or regulation. No tax, legal or accounting advice. This Presentation is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for (and you shall not construe it as) accounting, legal, regulatory, financial or tax advice or investment recommendations. Any statements of U.S. federal tax consequences contained in this Presentation were not intended to be used and cannot be used to avoid penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or to promote, market or recommend to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. Confidentiality. By accepting receipt or reading any portion of this Presentation, you agree that you will treat the Presentation confidentially. This reminder should not be read to limit, in any way, the terms of any confidentiality agreement you or your organization may have in place with Logan Circle. LOGANClRCLE P-\RT"ifl!.'\ " " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Marla Dye, Procurement Analyst Matt Wallace, Procurement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Single Signature Authority Report BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the second quarter ended December 31, 2014. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Certain contracts are executed under single signature authority as permitted in the Commission's Procurement Policy Manual adopted in December 2012. The Executive Director is authorized to sign services contracts that are less than $100,000 individually and in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1 million in any given fiscal year. Additionally, in accordance with Public Utilities Code Section 130323(c), the Executive Director is authorized to sign contracts for supplies, equipment, materials, and construction of all facilities and works under $50,000 individually. The attached report details all contracts that have been executed for the second quarter ended December 31, 2014 under the single signature authority granted to the Executive Director. The unused capacity of single signature authority for services at December 31, 2014 is $692,200. Attachment: Single Signature Authority Report as of December 31, 2014 . Agenda item SE 85 " CONSULTANT AMOUNT AVAILABLE July 1, 2014 All Security Services The Bank of New York Mellon Trust HOR, Inc. All Security Services Mathis Consulting Group California Highway Patrol Koff & Associates AMOUNT USED AMOUNT USED AMOUNT REMAINING through December 31, 2014 None fJl"1!!;,J_[Jy� J _ ..... Prepared by " SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Security Guard Services for Commission Owned Property on the SR-91 GIP Amendment for investment transactions related to trustee services for SR� 91 GIP bond proceeds Rail~oad Coordination Services on SR-91 HOV Project Security Guard Services for Commission Owned Property on the SR-91 CIP Management Consulting Services SAFE Call Box Coordinator Compensation, Classification & Benefits Study Agreements that fall under Public Utilities Code 130323 !Cl NIA J.~� J!� J_S_~a_!!..� J~~P..-_ Reviewed by ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ $1,000,000.00 60,000.00 20,000.00 35,000.00 307,800.00 307,800.00 $692,200.00 Note: Shaded area represents new contracts listed in the second quarter. 86 PAID AMOUNT 59,340.00 6,495.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 $ " REMAINING CONTRACT AMOUNT 660.00 13,505.00 35,000.00 620.00 61,794.50 7,800.00 65,000.00 $ " AGENDA ITEM SF " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Alex Menor, Capital Projects Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director Approve Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperative Planning and SUBJECT: Development of the Santa Ana River Trail Project between the Commission and the Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) 2) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 15-67-059-00 with the Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District (District) for project management services to complete the design phase and manage the construction phase of the Santa Ana River Trail project (Project). The MOU will reimburse the Commission's cost to perform project management services for managing the completion of design, construction management, and construction contracts for the Project; Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute agreements with the District to reflect non-funding changes related to the Project on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Approve an increase of $250,000 in FY 2014/15 budgeted revenues and expenditures for project management services related to the Project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The District is expanding trails across Riverside County to promote healthy lifestyles and provide alternative forms of active transportation and commuting. The Santa Ana River Trail is a major component of this effort, ultimately providing 100 miles of free and easily accessible hiking, riding, and biking opportunities. The trail is being built in segments in a joint effort with a number of public and private agencies including the counties of Orange and San Bernardino and 16 cities in the watershed. On August 20, 2008, the District entered into a MOU for cooperative planning and development of the Santa Ana River Trail with the cities of Norco and Corona. Since then, the parties to the Agenda Item 8F 87 MOU have been able to facilitate the design, environmental compliances, and construction documentation for large portions of the Project. In an effort to accelerate the construction and development of the Project, the District believes that on the ground implementation will be well served by an agency with greater staff resources and a higher level of expertise in dealing with many of the permitting and approving agencies during the construction process and desires to enter into a MOU with the Commission to manage the completion of this work. The District will remain as the lead agency for environmental (National Environmental Policy Act and California Environmental Quality Act) compliance, and the Commission will be the responsible agency for project approval, final design, and construction phases. This means that the Commission would procure and enter into contracts with a construction management firm and a construction contractor and administer construction of the Project. DISCUSSION: The District believes the Project will be well served by having the Commission manage the completion of preliminary design and construction. The District is bringing the MOU to the County Board of Supervisors meeting for consideration of approval on March 10, 2015. • The District has an agreement with the California State Coastal Conservancy to provide funds for trail planning, design, and construction through Proposition 84. These funds are the primary source of funding for the Project and for this agreement. Once the MOU is executed, the District will provide a $250,000 advance deposit to the Commission to cover project • management costs and progress payments to Project contractors. This deposit should provide sufficient funding for FY 2014/15 expenditures; however, staff recommends approval of a budget amendment to increase FY 2014/15 revenues and expenditures each in the amount of $250,000. Staff is working with District staff to develop estimated expenditures and related reimbursements for subsequent fiscal years. Staff reviewed the MOU and recommends the Committee approve this request and forward it to the Commission for final action. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: I No I Year: I FY 2014/15 Amount: I $250,000 revenues; $250,000 expenditures Source of Funds: I Riverside County Regional Parks Budget Adjustment: I Yes 007201416416057206741203 $250,000 (revenues} GL/Project Accounting No.: 007201 6XXXX/7XXXX/8XXXX 720 67 6XXXX/7XXXX/8XXXX $250,000 (expenditures) Fiscal Procedures Approved: ~~ J Date: I 02/17/2015 Attachment: Draft Memorandum of Understanding No. 15-67-059-00 Agenda Item 8F 88 • " " " Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR COOPERATIVE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into this day of ____ , 2015, dated for reference purposes only, by and between the Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District, a special district created pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Division 5, Chapter 3, Article 3 ("District") and the Riverside County Transportation Commission, a public agency existing under the authority of the laws of the State of California ("RCTC"). The District and RCTC are sometimes referred to herein individually as a "Party'', and collectively as the "Parties". The purposes of this MOU are to establish a mechanism for the Parties to work cooperatively to complete the Santa Ana River Trail ("Trail") in Riverside County, and to define the roles and responsibilities of each of the Parties in planning, designing, and constructing the remaining Trail segments. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Trail is a one hundred (100) mile recreational facility planned to connect the Counties of Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino, extending from the Pacific Ocean to the San Bernardino National Forest; and WHEREAS, portions (mostly Orange County) of the Trail were designated a National Recreation Trail by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior in 1977; and WHEREAS, in Riverside County the Trail is only partially constructed, and more than twenty (20) miles from the Hidden Valley Wildlife Area to the Orange County line remains to be planned, designed and built; and WHEREAS, the completion of the Trail in Riverside County is deemed a high priority by the District and RCTC due to its tremendous benefits as a healthy, scenic, and inexpensive source of transportation for commuters and recreation for hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians; and WHEREAS, completion of the Trail in Riverside County satisfies a need for the Parties to provide alternative modes of transportation in Riverside County; and WHEREAS, RCTC possesses the necessary engineering expertise and depth of knowledge to assume successful project management of the Trail; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to work cooperatively to accomplish and expedite the completion of the Trail in Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the District is the lead agency responsible for the Trail design and for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and is sometimes referred to herein as "Lead Agency" . 1 89 Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 WHEREAS, more work needs to be done to complete the Riverside County portion of the Trail and each of the Parties possess resources they wish to utilize towards construction of the Trail. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: This MOU is intended to supersede a previous agreement between the City of Corona, City of Norco and the District whereby the parties agreed to work cooperatively to complete the Santa Ana River Trail. The agreement, signed in 2008, directed the cities of Corona and Norco to assist in constructing the Trail with financing provided by the District. The District's participation in the MOU was terminated by written notice per terms set forth in the original agreement regarding termination. Effective date of that termination is _____ _ I. Roles and Responsibilities of the Parties A. RCTC. Subject to the availability of sufficient funding from the District, RCTC agrees to assume the responsibilities and perform the functions set forth below: 1. Serve as the District's overall project manager for the completion of the Trail located within Riverside County (and possibly neighboring counties if necessary and as dictated by additional agreements), and as a "Responsible Agency" for purposes of CEQA and NEPA compliance; and • 2. Subject to reimbursement by the District, function as the administering • agent assisting the Lead Agency on procuring, contracting for and managing all future consultant contracts related to the completion of the Trail in Riverside County including, but not limited to, the contract for construction management services (but excluding design and environmental services); and 3. Function as the administering agent assisting the District on managing the District's existing design and environmental services contracts, provided that the District will pay the consultants providing these services directly subject to the terms of the District's contracts with such consultants; and 4. Function as administering agent on construction contracts related to the completion of the Trail within Riverside County, which may include procuring, entering into and management such contract(s), subject to reimbursement by the District; and 5. Function as the agency responsible for administering the "Project Team" comprised of representatives of both Parties and actively participate in meetings; and 6. Prepare the procurement documents for the construction services related to Trail completion, and provide a final review of the plans, specifications and estimates included therewith. Provide the District with an opportunity to review and comment on the procurement documents, including the plans, specifications and estimates; and 7. Provide copies of consultant or contractor agreements executed by RCTC pursuant to this MOU and related to the Trail to the District; and 2 90 • " " " Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 8. Assist the Lead Agency in working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Army Corps") and other permitting agencies to execute agreements and permits as necessary to allow the Parties to build, and ultimately operate the Trail on federal lands in the Prado Basin; and 9. Assist the Lead Agency in the review and processing of the final environment documents (CEQA and NEPA) prepared for the Trail project pursuant to the requirements of the California and Federal law. If determined necessary by the Parties, RCTC will assist the Lead Agency with obtaining final certification of CEQA compliance and certification by the RCTC's Board of Commissioners and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, as "Responsible Agencies"; and-:- 10. Assume a lead role in reviewing the work products produced by consultants especially engineering plans, construction documents, and other technical materials; and 11. Co-sponsor or actively support grant applications submitted by the District for the completion of the Trail in Riverside County; and 12. Deposit any money received from District into a separate account used exclusively for Trail related costs and services ("Account") in accordance with Exhibit "A"; and 13. Use money from the Account to pay all invoices received for all consultant and contract services including, but not limited to, construction contracts (but excluding existing District design consultant and environmental consultant services contracts which shall be paid for directly by the District) administered by RCTC for work directly related to the completion of the Trail in Riverside County, and for RCTC staff salaries and benefits and other direct costs and related expenditures including, but not limited to, RCTC consultants under existing RCTC contracts whose services are utilized for the Trail project, all in accordance with the Reimbursement and Payment Procedures, Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and 14. Forward any invoices RCTC receives from existing District design and environmental services immediately upon receipt to the District and provide review and approval for payment comments, if requested by the District, within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoices for existing District design and environmental services. B. District. The District agrees to assume the responsibilities and perform the functions set forth below: 1. The District will remain the Lead Agency for the Trail project for the purposes of CEQA and NEPA Compliance; and 2. Assume the lead role in securing funding for Trail completion by seeking grants and securing local funding when available. The District will act as the sponsor for public and private grant applications related to the completion of the Trail in Riverside County; and 3 . If requested, provide timely review and comment within twenty (20) 3 91 Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 working days on any of the consultant work products for which RCTC is the administering agent pursuant to the terms of this MOU; and 4. Provide funding to RCTC in accordance with Exhibit "A" to be utilized for the purposes set forth under this MOU; and 5. Actively participate with RCTC and support RCTC in its work with the Army Corps and other regulatory agencies to establish the Trail on federal lands in the Prado Basin, and enter into agreements and execute necessary permits with the Army Corps and other permitting agencies deemed necessary by the District for the Trail project; and 6. As an in-kind contribution to the Trail project, the District will supply personnel resources necessary to fulfill its obligations herein without charge to RCTC. 7. Be the Party responsible for maintenance of the Trail, once constructed. 8. Timely pay invoices for the District's existing design and environmental services contracts, which contracts shall be paid for directly by the District. II. Term. This MOU shall become effective on the date it is executed by all of the Parties. This MOU will remain in effect for a period of ten ( 1 O) years thereafter or upon completion of the Trail Project, whichever is sooner, unless extended pursuant to Section Ill or terminated pursuant to Section IX herein. HL Extension of Term. This MOU may be extended at any time with the written consent of both Parties. All extensions will be effectuated through written amendments to this MOU which must be approved by the governing bodies of the Parties. IV. Administration. The Executive Director of RCTC or his/her designee shall administer this MOU on behalf of RCTC. The District General Manager or his/her designee shall administer this MOU on behalf of the District. V. Assignment and Subcontracting. The Parties may not assign or subcontract any portion of this MOU without the prior written approval of all Parties. Any assignment or subcontract made without prior written consent shall be null and void. Contracts entered into with consultants or contractors procured in accordance with the terms of this MOU shall not violate this provision. VI. Amendments to MOU. This MOU may be amended at any time with the written concurrence of both Parties. VII. Financial Records. The Parties shall maintain complete and accurate financial records with respect to all consultant and contractor services funded in whole or in part under this MOU for a period of five (5) years after the date on which the consultant or contractor services are complete and accepted or terminated. All records shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. • • VIII. Inspection of Records. During normal business hours and with prior written notice, RCTC shall permit representatives of the District, Riverside County, as well as any appropriate state or federal representatives to examine, audit, and make copies of records and documents • 4 92 " " " Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 relating to consultant and contractor services funded under this MOU for a period of three (3) years after the date on which the consultant or contractor services are complete and accepted or terminated. IX. Termination. Either party may terminate its participation in this MOU by providing thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other Party. The MOU may be terminated if the governing bodies of both Parties agree to do so in writing. In that event, the MOU will be terminated thirty (30) days following the written notice of termination. In the event of MOU termination, or the receipt of a written notice by RCTC to terminate its participation in this MOU, the District will assume all responsibilities vested in RCTC. RCTC will promptly assign its interest in all contracts related to the completion of the Trail project to the District, which will assume all of RCTC's obligations thereunder. RCTC shall not incur any additional costs after such time a notice of termination has been sent by the District. District shall be obligated to reimburse RCTC for costs incurred pursuant to the terms of this MOU prior to the date of termination. X. Provision of Funding by the District. The Parties acknowledge that the completion of the Trail in Riverside County will be a lengthy and complex project whose ultimate cost is presently estimated. Costs will be further estimated and provided once detailed engineering plans are completed and independent cost estimates are prepared. The Parties acknowledge that the Trail construction shall be divided into construction phases and is the intention of the Parties that the construction contracts will be let in one or more phases as agreed upon by the Parties. The Parties agree that no contracts for Trail construction, or any phase thereof, will be let by RCTC until full funding for the agreed upon construction phase(s) has/have been secured from the District or other sources. XI. Insurance. The Parties shall require the following: RCTC shall cause all contractors, excluding design consultant contract, to maintain in force, until completion and acceptance of the project consultant or construction contract, a policy of Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage of Bodily Injury Liability, Property Liability, and Contractual Liability in the amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) minimum single limit coverage, and a policy of Automobile Liability Insurance in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) minimum. RCTC shall require endorsements to each policy which name the District and Riverside County, their officers, officials, agents and employees as additionally insured. RCTC shall also require all consultants/contactors to maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance and Additional Insured Endorsements which meet the requirements of this section until completion and acceptance of the project consultant or construction contract. Evidence of compliance with the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Additional Insured Endorsements shall be provided to the Parties. District shall cause the design consultant contractor to maintain in force, until completion and acceptance of the project consultant or construction contract, a policy of Commercial General Liability insurance, including coverage of Bodily Injury Liability, Property Liability, and Contractual Liability in the amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) minimum single limit coverage, and a policy of Automobile Liability Insurance in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) minimum. District shall require endorsements to each policy which name RCTC and its officers, officials, agents and employees as additionally insured. District shall also require all consultants/contactors to maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance and Additional Insured Endorsements which meet the requirements of this section until completion and 5 93 Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 acceptance of the project consultant or construction contract. Evidence of compliance with the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Additional Insured Endorsements shall be provided to the Parties. XII. Indemnification. The Parties are public agencies as defined by applicable law. To the extent that liability may be imposed on the Parties by the provisions of Government Code Section 895.2, as between the Parties, each Party shall be liable for its own acts or omissions, including for all claims, liabilities, injuries, suits, and demands and expenses of all kinds which may result or arise out of any alleged malfeasance or neglect, caused or alleged to have been caused by the relevant Party or its employees or representatives in the performance or omission of any act or responsibility of the relevant Party under this MOU. In the event that a claim is made against the Parties it is the intent of the Parties to cooperate in the defense of said claim and to cause their insurers to do likewise. XIII. Notices. All notices required under this MOU shall be sent by regular mail, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: If to the DISTRICT: General Manager Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District 4600 Crestmore Road Jurupa Valley, California 92509-6858 If to RCTC: Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission County Administrative Center, Third Floor 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 XIV. Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in the provisions of this MOU is intended to create duties or obligations to, or rights in, third-parties not parties to this MOU, or affect the legal liability of the Parties to this MOU by imposing any standard of care respecting the design, construction or maintenance of the Trail different from the standard of care imposed by law. XV. Recitals. The Parties understand, acknowledge and agree that the Recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this MOU. XVI. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts. When a counterpart shall have been signed by each Party hereto, each shall be deemed an original, and all of which constitute one and the same instrument. • • XVII. Limitation of District Funding Obligation. In the event that insufficient or no funding is appropriated in support of this MOU, then the District may terminate this MOU and the Parties shall no longer be obligated to perform under this MOU, provided that the District shall be obligated to reimburse RCTC for costs incurred pursuant to the terms of this MOU prior to the date of termination. RCTC shall not incur any additional costs after such time a notice of • 6 94 " " " Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 termination has been sent by the District. XVIII. Funding. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, in the event the District experiences reductions in Proposition 84 or Development Impact Fee funding in relation to the Trail project, the District's allocation to RCTC for this Trail project shall decrease in proportion to the decrease the District receives in such funding. If such a decrease is issued, the Parties will be required to reevaluate the Trail project and recommend a scope reduction to accommodate the funding available, provided that the District shall be obligated to reimburse RCTC for all costs incurred pursuant to the terms of this MOU prior to notification by the District of any reductions in funding. XIX. No Maintenance Obligations. Nothing in this MOU shall make RCTC responsible for any future maintenance of the Trail in Riverside County, if and when constructed. Any such maintenance obligations shall remain with the District. [Signature provisions on following page] 7 95 SIGNATURE PAGE TO Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR COOPERATIVE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN-SPACE DISTRICT By:---------- Chairman, Board of Directors Date: ------ ATIEST: Kecia Harper-lhem Clerk of the Board By:-------- Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gregory P. Priamos County Counsel By: __________ _ Synthia M. Gunzel Deputy County Counsel 8 96 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: ------- Anne Mayer Executive Director Date:. ______ _ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:---------- Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • " " " Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 EXHIBIT "A" REIMBURSEMENT AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES FOR THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR COOPERATIVE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY The parties agree to the following reimbursement and payment procedures as follows: For all contracts entered into by RCTC for the Trail Project under this MOU (excluding existing District design consultant and environmental consultant services contracts): A. RCTC Agrees: 1. To pay within the time period required in each contract or forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt all monthly invoices, whichever is sooner, for contracted services rendered for the Trail Project from the Account. 2. To prepare and submit to the District, within a fifteen (15) calendar day period after the close end of each month, a reimbursement claim for contracted services incurred during the month, along with original invoices for contracted services rendered and paid from the Account for the Trail Project to maintain a positive balance on the Account. All claims submitted to the District for reimbursement are to be addressed to the attention of the Grants & Contracts Analyst at 4600 Crestmore Road, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509. 3. To use funds in the Account to reimburse RCTC staff salaries and benefits, and other direct costs and related expenditures including, but not limited to, RCTC consultants under existing RCTC contracts whose services are directly expended on the Trail Project and to prepare and submit a monthly report to the District providing amounts paid to RCTC from the Account for reimbursement/payment of RCTC's staff salaries and benefits, and other direct costs and related expenditures, as described above, for each calendar month. 4. To furnish to the District a final accounting and reconciliation of Trail project expenses within ninety (90) calendar days following the recording of the Notice of Completion for the Santa Ana River Trail Project or the termination of the MOU, on the forms provided in a format reasonably agreed upon by the Parties and containing such detail that at minimum will satisfy the reporting requirements of any of the funding sources and is reasonably agreed upon by the Parties. The Parties will meet soon after approval of the MOU by the Parties to initiate development of said forms. 5. To receive and deposit a Five Hundred Thousand Even Dollar ($500,000) advance from the District in an interest bearing account to be used for payments to contractors on the Trail Project, and for RCTC staff salaries and benefits, and other direct costs and related expenditures, as described above. Once the first payment is made to a contractor, to reimburse RCTC for staff salaries and benefits, or to reimburse 9 97 Agreement No. 15-67-069-00 RCTC for other direct costs or related expenditures, RCTC shall request reimbursements as provided herein so that a positive balance is consistently maintained in the Account. RCTC shall pay out the Account balance on final Trail project costs in place of requesting reimbursement from District when the outstanding costs do not exceed the balance in the Account. Once the Trail project is complete or the MOU has been terminated by the Parties pursuant to the terms of the MOU, RCTC shall refund any unexpended funds to the District within ninety (90) days thereof. B. District Agrees: 1. To provide a Five Hundred Thousand Even Dollars ($500,000) advance for payments made by RCTC for the Trail project under this MOU. 2. To reimburse on a monthly basis through the completion of the Trail project or for the duration of the MOU, all expenditures for RCTC staff salaries and benefits, and other direct costs and related expenditures, as described above, and contracted services rendered for the Trail project and paid by RCTC within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt to keep a positive balance on the Account. 10 98 • • • " " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Robert Yates, Multi modal Services Director Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director Lorelle Moe-Luna, Senior Staff Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Title VI Program Report, including Public Participation Plan and Language Assistance Plan BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the Title VI Program Report, including the Public Participation Plan and Language Assistance Plan in compliance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and amendments protects persons in the United States from being excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The Commission's commitment to ensuring that its services are delivered and implemented in accordance with Title VI is described in the Non-Discrimination notice and procedures that were adopted by the Commission on October 10, 2012. The existing practices conform to Caltrans' requirements for implementing Title VI and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations. However, as a recipient of FTA funds, requirements for implementing Title VI are more extensive and require the adoption of a Title VI Program under the guidelines set forth in FTA Circular 4702.lB, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. The Circular has general requirements and guidelines for all recipients and additional requirements for fixed route transit providers, states, and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). The Commission is unique in that it is a recipient of FTA funds (through the Rail Program) however does not directly operate transit service. Additionally, the Commission is not the MPO for the region as the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) serves that role. As such, the Commission does not fit the "typical" agency description for Title VI programs. In its role as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) and County Agenda Item BG 99 Transportation Commission (CTC), only the general requirements and guidelines are applicable, and are summarized below. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Title VI Notice to the Public - A notice shall be posted in public locations and the website, and include language that the recipient complies with Title VI and instructions on how to file a Title VI complaint to the Commission and directly to the FTA. Title VI Complaint Procedures -Procedures on filing a complaint shall be developed for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints. Title VI Complaint Form -A complaint form must be accessible and include the necessary information and questions to conduct an investigation. List of transit-related Title VI investigations, complaints, or lawsuits -FTA requires that files of investigations, complaints, or lawsuits that pertain to allegations of discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in transit-related activities and programs be maintained for three years and a list of cases be held for five years. Public Participation Plan -An established process or plan shall promote inclusive public participation and describe the proactive strategies, procedures, and desired outcomes of a recipient's public participation activities. Language Assistance Plan -Recipients are required to take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to benefits, services, information, and other important portions of its programs or activities for persons who are limited-English proficient (LEP). A table depicting the membership of non-elected committees and councils, broken down by race -This pertains to transit-related, non-elected planning boards, advisory councils or committees. 8) Monitoring procedures for subrecipients -Primary recipients are responsible for establishing monitoring procedures for its subrecipients who are extended federal funds, unless the subrecipient is also a direct recipient of FTA funds. 9) Title VI equity analysis for the site and location of facilities -"Facilities" included in this provision include, but are not limited to, storage facilities, maintenance facilities, operations centers, etc and excludes bus shelters, transit stations, and power substations. Recipients are required to complete an equity analysis, including the impacts of various site alternatives, during the planning stage with regard to where a project is located or sited to ensure that the location is selected without regard to race, color, or national origin. 10) Documentation that the governing board has reviewed and approved the Title VI Program - A copy of meeting minutes or a resolution must be submitted with the Title VI Program Report. As a Joint Powers Agency member of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), Metrolink traditionally submitted a Title VI Program on the Commission's behalf. Although historically FTA accepted this approach, the Commission is being proactive to ensure complete transparency and compliance with all programs and services, whether FTA-funded or not. The institution-wide application of Title VI has been emphasized at recent FTA workshops and since the Circular was revised in October 2012 with the assertion, "Title VI covers all of the operations • • of covered entities without regard to whether specific portions of the covered program or • Agenda Item BG 100 " " " activity are federally funded ... Recipients are responsible for ensuring that all of their activities are in compliance with Title VI. In other words, a recipient may engage in activities not described in the Circular, such as ridesharing program, roadway incident response program, or other programs not funded by FT A, and those programs must also be administered in a nondiscriminatory manner." (Chapter 11-1) The Commission utilized the services of AMMA Transit Planning to complete the Title VI Program Report, which is attached. The report details the Commission's actions taken to implement FTA's Title VI requirements in its services and programs. Upon approval of the Title VI Program, staff will submit the report to FTA via the Transportation Electronic Award Management (TEAM) system. Concurrence and approval of the report by the FTA Regional Civil Rights Office is anticipated within 30 days. The Title VI Program will be updated every three years, or as necessary, when guidelines are revised or as compliance reviews require. There is no financial impact to the Commission budget with the adoption of this program. Upon adoption of the Title VI Program, any expenses incurred to implement Title VI Program will be part of the Rail Operations annual budget. Attachment: Title VI Program Report Agenda Item 8G 101 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Riverside County Transportation Commission Title VI Program Report Prepared for the Federal Transit Administration In accordance with Circular 4702.lB Commission Approved on March 11, 2015 (Pending) Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501 102 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT This document was prepared by AMMA Transit Planning on behalf of the Riverside County Transportation Commission. This Title VI Program complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including new provisions detailed in U.S. Department of Transportation's FTA Circular 4702.lB, "Title VI Requirement and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients." 103 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose ............................................................................................................................. l Background of RCTC ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Title VI Notice to the Public .......................................................................................................................... 2 Title VI Complaint Procedures and Complaint Form .................................................................................... 2 List of Transit-Related Title VI Investigations, Complaints, or Lawsuits ....................................................... 6 Public Participation Plan ............................................................................................................................... 6 Language Assistance Plan ............................................................................................................................. 6 Membership of Non-Elected Committees and Councils ............................................................................... 7 Subrecipient Compliance .............................................................................................................................. 8 Title VI Equity Analysis for Determining the Site or Location of Facilities .................................................... 8 Perris Valley Line ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Approval of the Title VI Program ................................................................................................................ 10 Appendices Appendix A: Title VI Policy, Procedures, and Complaint Form (English and Spanish} Appendix B: Public Participation Plan Appendix C: Language Assistance Plan Appendix D: Perris Valley Line, Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment, Section 3.11: Environmental Justice and Socioeconomics Appendix E: Documentation of Governing Body Approval (Staff Report and Meeting Minutes} 104 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Introduction and Purpose Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects persons in the United States from being excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC or Commission) is committed to ensuring that its services are delivered and implemented in accordance with Title VI and other non-discriminatory regulations from the state and federal levels. As a state recipient, RCTC complies with the guidelines set forth by the State of California's (State) Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans requires local agencies to adopt a non-discriminatory notice, grievance procedures, complaint form, and a Coordinator of the program. These were approved by the Commission on October 10, 2012 for implementing Title VI and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). RCTC is also a recipient under the federal Department of Transportation (DOT). Under the DOT, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements for implementing Title VI include the adoption of a Title VI Program report pursuant to FTA Circular 4702.lB, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. The purpose of this report is to certify RCTC's compliance with FTA Circular 4702.lB every three years. As stated in Chapter II, page 1 of the Circular, RCTC will ensure that Title VI compliance is carried out in all of its programs and services, whether federally-funded or not, "Title VI covers all of the operations of covered entities without regard to whether specific portions of the covered program or activity are federally funded ... In other words, a recipient may engage in activities not described in the Circular, such as ridesharing program, roadway incident response program, or other programs not funded by FTA, and those programs must also be administered in a nondiscriminatory manner." The Circular has general requirements for all recipients and additional guidelines for Fixed Route Transit Providers, States, and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) and County Transportation Commission (CTC), only the general requirements and guidelines are applicable to RCTC, and are as follows: 1) Title VI Notice to the Public 2) Title VI Complaint Procedures 3) Title VI Complaint Form 4) List of transit-related Title VI investigations, complaints, or lawsuits 5) Public Participation Plan 6) Language Assistance Plan 7) A table depicting the membership on non-elected committees broken down by race 8) Monitoring procedures for Subrecipients 9) Title VI equity analysis for the site and location of facilities 10) Documentation that the governing board has reviewed and approved the Title VI Program The following sections of this report document how the Commission is in compliance with each requirement . 105 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Background of RCTC The Commission was established in 1976 by the State to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County. The governing body consists of all five members of the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's 28 cities, and one non-voting member appointed by the Governor of California. As the designated RTPA and CTC, its responsibilities include setting policies, establishing priorities, coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and local jurisdictions. The public is most familiar with RCTC for its capital projects and motorist aid services. The various regional capital projects that RCTC is involved in throughout the County include the following: .,/ State Route 60/215 East Junction Project .,/ State Route 60 Truck Climbing Lanes .,/ State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project .,/ Interstate 15 Corridor Improvement Project .,/ State Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle Project .,/ Widening of State Route 71 .,/ Mid-County Parkway .,/ State Route 91/71 Interchange Project .,/ Realignment of State Route 79 .,/ Interstate 10 Truck Climbing Lanes .,/ Widening of State Route 74 .,/ Interstate 10/ State Route 60 Interchange .,/ Widening of Interstate 1-215 .,/ Interstate 215 Bi-County Project .,/ Expansion of Metrolink from Riverside to Perris The Commission also provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. These services include the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a program that provides call box service for motorists; the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP), a roving tow truck service that assist motorists with disabled vehicles on the main highways of the County during peak rush hour traffic periods; and Inland Empire 511 (IE511), a traveler information system. These programs and projects are funded with various local, state, and federal sources. Local funding sources consist of Measure A, the countywide sales tax; Debt proceeds, derived from issuing bonds; and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), derived from developer impact fees. State funding sources for projects are derived from the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). RCTC also receives apportionments of federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); and FTA Sections 5307, 5309, 5337 formula funds. Additionally, the Commission was also awarded an FTA Small Starts grant for the Perris Valley Line. The Commission is unique in that it is not a transit provider like many other CTCs, however, does receive FTA formula funds (under the Rail Program) for transfer and expenditure for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA or Metrolink). Regardless of funding source, RCTC is committed to ensuring that its projects and services are delivered and implemented in a non-discriminatory manner. 106 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Title VI Notice to the Public Recipients must notify beneficiaries of protections under Title VI by posting a notice in public locations that confirms that the recipient complies with Title VI and provides instructions on how to file a Title VI complaint to RCTC and directly to the FTA. The following notice is available on RCTC's website and at the front desk of RCTC's offices at 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. RCTC operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes she or he has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with RCTC. For more information on RCTC's Title VI program, and the procedures to file a complaint, contact (951) 787-7141; email standifo@rctc.org; or visit our administrative office at 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. For more information, you may also visit our website at www.rctc.org for additional information and to download a complaint form under "About Us" . A complainant may file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration by filing a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights, Attention: Title VI Program Coordinator, East Building, 5th Floor -TCR, 1200 New Jersey Avenue., SE, Washington, DC 20590. If information is needed in another language, contact (951) 787-7141. The notice is considered a vital document and is available in Spanish, consistent with DOT limited- English proficient (LEP) guidance and RCTC's Language Assistance Plan (LAP). The Spanish translation is also available on the website and at RCTC's front desk. See Appendix A for a complete English and Spanish version the Commission's Title VI Policy, Procedures, and Complaint form. Title VI Complaint Procedures and Complaint Form Requirements stipulate that recipients develop procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints filed against them and make their procedures for filing a complaint available to members of the public. Recipients must also develop a Title VI complaint form and make this form available. RCTC's Complaint Procedures and Complaint Form are provided in Appendix A. Similar to the Non- Discrimination policy requirements of Caltrans, the Deputy Executive Director, John Standiford, has been 107 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT identified as the Civil Rights Liaison and will be the primary contact for addressing Title VI complaints. The procedures explain that any person, or group of persons, who believes that they have been subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin may file a complaint to RCTC, or directly to FTA. RCTC will render a decision within 15 days upon follow-up with the complainant. The Circular also requires that the recipient explicitly state that a complainant has the opportunity to submit a complaint directly to FTA and must provide the contact information for submitting a complaint. These documents are available on RCTC's website and at the front desk of RCTC's offices at 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. In addition to the public notice, the complaint procedures and form are considered vital documents and as such are available in Spanish, consistent with the DOT LEP Guidance and RCTC's LAP. Procedures for Filing, Investigating, and Tracking Complaints Any person, group of individuals, or entity that believes it has been subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin may file a complaint with directly or by a representative to the Commission or to the DOT FTA. Submission of Complaint to RCTC To file a complaint with RCTC, the complainant may contact the main reception at (951) 787-7141 to request a copy of the complaint form and procedures, or visit the website at www.rctc.org to download the complaint form and procedures. When possible, the complainant should complete the complaint form, or in writing provide information about the alleged discrimination containing the following: • Name of Complainant; • Address of Complainant; • Phone number of Complainant; • Date of incident; • Location of incident; and • Description of incident In cases where the complainant is unable or incapable of providing a written statement, the complainant may be interviewed or the complaint form may also be provided in alternative means such as audio or Braille. The complaint should be submitted as soon as possible but no later than 180 calendar days after the alleged violation to the Deputy Executive Director by email at standifo@rctc.org, postal mail, or in person at the following: Riverside County Transportation Commission John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. 0. Box 12008 108 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Riverside, CA 92502-2208 If the information provided is insufficient to conduct an investigation or render a decision, RCTC may request additional information from the complainant. Failure of the complainant to submit additional information within the designated time frame may be considered good cause to administratively close the case on the basis of lack of investigative merit. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the complaint, RCTC's Deputy Executive Director, or designee, will request a meeting to discuss the alleged incident with the complainant. Within 15 calendar days of the discussion, RCTC will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant. The response will explain the position of RCTC and offer options for resolution of the complaint. If the complainant is not satisfied with the decision by the Deputy Executive Director, or designee, an appeal may be filed within 15 calendar days after receipt of the response, to RCTC's Executive Director. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the appeal, the Executive Director, or designee, will request a meeting to discuss the alleged incident with the complainant. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the Executive Director or designee will respond in writing, and, where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, with a final decision of the complaint . Submission of Complaint to FTA The complainant has the right to submit a complaint directly to the FTA, however, is encouraged to initially file with RCTC. As described in FTA Circular 4702.lB, Chapter IX, to file with the FTA, the complaint must submitted no later than 180 days after the date of alleged discrimination at the address below, unless the time for filing is extended by FTA. Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights Title VI Program Coordinator East Building, 5th Floor -TCR 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Once a complaint has been accepted by FTA for investigation, FTA will notify RCTC that it is the subject of a Title VI complaint and ask RCTC to respond in writing to the complainant's allegations. If the complainant agrees to release the complaint to RCTC, FTA will provide the agency with the complaint, which may have personal information redacted at the request of the complainant. If the complainant does not agree to release the complaint to RCTC, FTA may choose to close the complaint . 109 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT FTA will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with DOT's Title VI regulations. The investigation will include, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with DOT's Title VI regulations occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the recipient has failed to comply with DOT's Title VI regulations. After FTA has concluded the investigation, FTA's Office of Civil Rights will transmit to the complainant and RCTC one of the following letters based on its findings: • A letter of finding indicating FTA did not find a violation of DOT's Title VI regulations. This letter will include an explanation of why FTA did not find a violation. If applicable, the letter may include a list of procedural violations or concerns, which will put RCTC on notice that certain practices are questionable and that without corrective steps, a future violation finding is possible. • A letter of finding indicating RCTC is in violation of DOT's Title VI regulations. The letter will include each violation referenced to the applicable regulation, a brief description of proposed remedies, notice of the time limit on coming into compliance, the consequences of failure to achieve voluntary compliance, and an offer of assistance to RCTC in devising a remedial plan for compliance, if appropriate. FTA will administratively close Title VI complaints before a resolution is reached where (1) the complainant decides to withdraw the case; (2) the complainant is not responsive to FTA's requests for information or to sign a consent release form; (3) FTA has conducted or plans to conduct a related compliance review of the agency against which the complaint is lodged; (4) litigation has been filed raising similar allegations involved in the complaint; (5) the complaint was not filed within 180 days of the alleged discrimination; (6) the complaint does not indicate a possible violation of 49 CFR part 21; (7) the complaint is so weak, insubstantial, or lacking in detail that FTA determines it is without merit, or so replete with incoherent or unreadable statements that it, as a whole, cannot be considered to be grounded in fact; (8) the complaint has been investigated by another agency and the resolution of the complaint meets DOT regulatory standards; (9) the complaint allegations are foreclosed by previous decisions of the Federal courts, the Secretary, DOT policy determinations, or the U.S. DOT's Office of Civil Rights; {10) FTA obtains credible information that the allegations raised by the complaint have been resolved; (11) the complaint is a continuation of a pattern of previously filed complaints involving the same or similar allegations against the same recipient or other recipients that have been found factually or legally insubstantial by FTA; (12) the same complaint allegations have been filed with another Federal, state, or local agency, and FTA anticipates that the recipient will provide the complainant with a comparable resolution process under comparable legal standards; or (13) the death of the complainant or injured party makes it impossible to investigate the allegations fully. Tracking of Complaints As required by FTA, all written complaints received by RCTC's Deputy Executive Director, or designee, appeals to the Executive Director, or designee, and responses from these two offices will be retained 110 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT by RCTC for three years. In addition, a summary list of complaints will be tracked for five years as required. List of Transit-Related Title VI Investigations, Complaints, or Lawsuits FTA requires that files of investigations, complaints, or lawsuits that pertain to allegations of discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in transit-related activities and programs be maintained for three years and a list of cases be held for five years. RCTC has not received any transit-related Title VI complaints, nor has it been involved in any transit- related Title VI investigations or lawsuits. Public Participation Plan Recipients are required to promote inclusive public participation and seek out and consider the needs and input of the general public, including interested parties and those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems, such as minority and LEP persons. The Public Participation Plan is the established process or plan that describes the proactive strategies, procedures, and desired outcomes of a recipient's public participation activities. RCTC developed its Public Participation Plan by considering the demographic analysis of the population(s) affected, the type of plan, program, and/or service under consideration, and the resources available to the Commission. The Public Participation Plan is provided as Appendix B. Language Assistance Plan Recipients are required to take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to benefits, services, information, and other important portions of its programs or activities for LEP populations. FTA Circular 4702.lB details the components of the Language Assistance Plan, including the Four Factor Analysis, which provides a careful analysis of LEP persons that the recipient may encounter to determine the specific language services that are appropriate to provide . 111 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT RCTC undertook the Four Factor Analysis and developed appropriate language assistance planning based on the results. The Commission then developed a Language Assistance Plan to assist it in effectively implementing the requirements and communicating with LEP individuals. The Language Assistance Plan is provided as Appendix C. Membership of Non-Elected Committees and Councils Recipients that have transit-related, non-elected planning boards, advisory councils or committees, or similar bodies, in which the membership is selected by the recipient, must provide a table depicting the racial breakdown of the membership of those committees, and a description of efforts made to encourage the participation of minorities on such committees or councils. RCTC has one transit-related committee that is applicable to this requirement, the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Committee (CAC/SSTAC}. Section 99238 of the State Transportation Development Act (TDA) regulations requires the Commission to have a CAC/SSTAC as part of the oversight process in administering the TDA funds. The TDA allows stipulates the membership of this body: 1) One representative of a potential transit user 60 years of age and older; 2) One representative of a potential transit user who is disabled; 3) Two representatives of the social service providers for seniors; 4) Two representatives ofthe social service providers for the disabled, including one representative of a social service transportation provider, if one exists; 5) One representative of a social service provider for persons of limited means; and 6) Two representatives of a Consolidated Transportation Service Agency(s) designated as such pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 15975 of the Government Code, including one representative from an operator, if one exists. The CAC/SSTAC serves the Commission by participating in the transit needs hearing and reviewing the Short Range Transit Plans developed by public transit operators as part of the Commission's annual budget development process. Most importantly, the CAC/SSTAC provides a dialogue between citizen appointee representatives and the public transit and specialized transit programs of Riverside County around matters of mutual concern and provides the Commission with invaluable community feedback. Appointments are for an initial one-year term and some will be extended in the future to ensure continuity of service for the Committee. The adopted bylaws for the CAC/SSTAC state that membership can consist of up to fifteen members appointed by the Commission, in the manner provided by the Commission in accordance with Section 99238. 112 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT In the 2013 process of appointing new members to a restructured CAC/SSTAC, opportunity for application was broadly noticed in media, on the RCTC website, and in various outreach settings, including asking Commissioners for input and conducting individualized outreach to social service providers. Several dozen applications were received and, in vetting these for potential appointment to the CAC, care was taken to address the diversity, including racial and ethnic representation, called for in the SSTAC guidelines. A breakdown of the current nine members' race and ethnicity follows. There is additional racial and ethnic diversity among the transit agency representatives who also participate, but not appointed members ofthe CAC/SSTAC. Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council African Asian Native Race Caucasian Latino American American American CAC/SSTAC 60% 30% 10% Subrecipient Compliance If a recipient is a primary recipient, which means any FTA recipient that extends federal financial assistance to a subrecipient, then it is required to ensure that subrecipients are complying with Title VI, including the submittal of a subrecipient's Title VI documents. RCTC is in the process of executing a funding agreement in which Metrolink will be able to request reimbursement through RCTC. Upon execution of the agreement, Metro link would be a subrecipient of RCTC. However, since Metrolink is also a direct recipient of FTA funds and submits a Title VI report directly, RCTC is not required to monitor its Title VI procedures, as stipulated in Chapter Ill, page 11 of the Circular, "When a subrecipient is also a direct recipient of FTA funds, that is, applies for funds directly from FTA in addition to receiving funds from a primary recipient, the subrecipient/direct recipient reports directly to FTA and the primary recipient/designated recipient is not responsible for monitoring compliance of that subrecipient." Title VI Equity Analysis for Determining the Site or Location of Facilities This requirement stipulates that recipients should complete a Title VI equity analysis during the planning stage with regard to where a project is located or sited to ensure the location is selected without regard to race, color, or national origin. The equity analysis must include: " Outreach to persons potentially impacted by the siting of facilities . 113 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT • Comparison of the equity impacts of various siting alternatives, and the analysis must occur before the selection of the preferred site. The purpose of completing a Title VI analysis during the project development stage is to determine if a project will have disparate impacts on the basis of race, color, or national origin. If such impacts exist then the project may move forward with the proposed location if there is substantial legitimate justification for locating the project there, and there are no alternative locations that would have a less adverse impact on members of a group protected under Title VI. For purposes of this requirement, the Circular states that "facilities" does not include bus shelters, as they are transit amenities and are covered under the additional requirements for fixed route transit operators, nor does it include transit stations, power substations, etc., as those are evaluated during project development and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. Facilities included in this provision include, but are not limited to, storage facilities, maintenance facilities, operations centers, etc. Perris Valley Line RCTC is in construction on the Perris Valley Line, which expands Metrolink commuter rail service on the 91 Line. The new service will extend 24 miles from downtown Riverside to south Perris and will add four new stations along the route and one layover facility. The new stations will be located at Riverside Hunter Park, Moreno Valley/March Field, Downtown Perris, and South Perris. The equity analysis for this project was completed in February 2012 and was completed under the previous FTA Circular, 4702.lA. Under Circular 4702.lA, the equity analysis requirements differed in that recipients were required to integrate an environmental justice analysis into their National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation of construction projects, with the following components: a. A description of the low-income and minority population within the study area affected by the project, and a discussion of the method used to identify this population (e.g., analysis of Census data, minority business directories, direct observation, or a public involvement process). b. A discussion of all adverse effects of the project both during and after construction that would affect the identified minority and low-income population. c. A discussion of all positive effects that would affect the identified minority and low-income population, such as an improvement in transit service, mobility, or accessibility. d. A description of all mitigation and environmental enhancement actions incorporated into the project to address the adverse effects, including, but not limited to, any special features of the relocation program that go beyond the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Act and address adverse community effects such as separation or cohesion issues; and the replacement of the community resources destroyed by the project. e. A discussion of the remaining effects, if any, and why further mitigation is not proposed. 114 • • • " " " ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT f. For projects that traverse predominantly minority and low-income and predominantly non- minority and non-low-income areas, a comparison of mitigation and environmental enhancement actions that affect predominantly low-income and minority areas with mitigation implemented in predominantly non-minority or non-low-income areas. Recipients and subrecipients that determine there is no basis for such a comparison should describe why that is so. As part of the NEPA process and in compliance with Environmental Justice (EJ) Executive Order 12898, a Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) was prepared for FTA in February 2012 and subsequently approved on May 24, 2012, with a finding of no significant impact. A copy of the Final SEA section on "Environmental Justice and Socioeconomics" is provided in Appendix D. In it, the entire project area including each station and the South Perris layover facility were analyzed for disparate impacts on minority and low-income populations. The study area was comprised of 28 whole census tracts (and 76 Block Groups), tracts that are intersected by or contiguous to the project corridor and proposed stations. The initial stages of this analysis focused on public outreach, paying particular focus to communities that qualified as EJ populations. Public involvement was designed and executed to reach the affected populations and included six public scoping meetings, publie hearings and informational meetings. Bilingual project materials, notices and newsletters were also developed and distributed . The analysis resulted in finding no disproportionate adverse effects and no unmitigated significant adverse effects would be borne by any of the populations in the project area. The Perris Valley Line is anticipated to be operational in December 2015. Metrolink, as the transit provider, will be responsible for conducting the Title VI service and fare equity analysis approximately six months prior to the commencement of service. Approval of the Title VI Program All recipients are required to provide documentation such as meeting minutes, resolution, or other appropriate documentation showing that the governing body reviewed and approved the Title VI Program prior to submission to FTA. RCTC's Title VI Program was reviewed and approved by the Budget and Implementation Committee on February 23, 2015 and forwarded to the full Commission for approval on March 11, 2015. Appendix D includes a copy of the meeting minutes and staff report for evidence of approval. 115 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT APPENDIX A: TITLE VI POLICY NOTICE, COMPLAINT PROCEDURES, AND COMPLAINT FORM (ENGLISH AND SPANISH) 116 " " " A TI ACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TITLE VI NOTICE, COMPLAINT PROCEDURES, AND COMPLAINT FORM In accordance with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Circular 4702.1 B, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) is required to notify beneficiaries of protection under Title VI, develop complaint procedures, and develop a complaint form. These documents are considered vital and are translated into languages other than English, as needed and consistent with the Department of Transportation's (DOT) Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Guidance and the Commission's Language Assistance Plan (LAP). I. POLICY AND NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC It is the policy of the Commission to not discriminate or exclude individuals on the basis of race, color, or national origin in admission to its programs, services, or activities, in access to them, in treatment of, or in any aspect of operations. The following notice shall be posted on the Commission's website, main reception area, and relevant publication materials: RCTC operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes she or he has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with RCTC. For more information on RCTC's Title VI program, and the procedures to file a complaint, contact (951) 787-7141; email standifo@rctc.org; or visit our administrative office at 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. For more information, you may also visit our website at www.rctc.org for additional information and to download a complaint form under "About Us". A complainant may file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration by filing a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights, Attention: Title VI Program Coordinator, East Building, 5th Floor -TCR, 1200 New Jersey Avenue., SE, Washington, DC 20590. If information is needed in another language, contact (951) 787- 7141 . 118 A TI ACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT II. PROCEDURES FOR FILING, INVESTIGATING, AND TRACKING COMPLAINTS Any person, group of individuals, or entity that believes it has been subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin may file a complaint with directly or by a representative to the Commission or to the DOT FT A. Submission of Complaint to RCTC To file a complaint with RCTC, the complainant may contact the main reception at (951) 787-7141 to request a copy of the complaint form and procedures, or visit the website at www.rctc.org to download the complaint form and procedures. When possible, the complainant should complete the complaint form, or in writing provide information about the alleged discrimination containing the following: • Name of Complainant; • Address of Complainant; • Phone number of Complainant; • Date of incident; • Location of incident; and • Description of incident In cases where the complainant is unable or incapable of providing a written statement, the complainant may be interviewed or the complaint form may also be provided in alternative means such as audio or Braille. The complaint should be submitted as soon as possible but no later than 180 calendar days after the alleged violation to the Deputy Executive Director by email at standifo@rctc.org, postal mail, or in person at the following: Riverside County Transportation Commission John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. 0. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 If the information provided is insufficient to conduct an investigation or render a decision, RCTC may request additional information from the complainant. Failure of the complainant to submit additional information within the designated time frame may be considered good cause to administratively close the case on the basis of lack of investigative merit. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the complaint, RCTC's Deputy Executive Director, or designee, will request a meeting to discuss the alleged incident with the complainant. Within 15 calendar days of the 119 • • • " " " A TT AC HM ENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT discussion, RCTC will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant. The response will explain the position of RCTC and offer options for resolution of the complaint. If the complainant is not satisfied with the decision by the Deputy Executive Director, or designee, an appeal may be filed within 15 calendar days after receipt of the response, to RCTC's Executive Director. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the appeal, the Executive Director, or designee, will request a meeting to discuss the alleged incident with the complainant. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the Executive Director or designee will respond in writing, and, where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, with a final decision of the complaint. Submission of Complaint to FTA The complainant has the right to submit a complaint directly to the FTA, however, is encouraged to initially file with RCTC. As described in FTA Circular 4702.1 B, Chapter IX, to file with the FT A, the complaint must submitted no later than 180 days after the date of alleged discrimination at the address below, unless the time for filing is extended by FT A Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights Title VI Program Coordinator East Building, 5th Floor -TCR 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Once a complaint has been accepted by FTA for investigation, FTA will notify RCTC that it is the subject of a Title VI complaint and ask RCTC to respond in writing to the complainant's allegations. If the complainant agrees to release the complaint to RCTC, FT A will provide the agency with the complaint, which may have personal information redacted at the request of the complainant. If the complainant does not agree to release the complaint to RCTC, FT A may choose to close the complaint. FT A will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with DOT's Title VI regulations. The investigation will include, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with DOT's Title VI regulations occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the recipient has failed to comply with DOT's Title VI regulations . 120 A TI ACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT After FTA has concluded the investigation, FTA's Office of Civil Rights will transmit to the complainant and RCTC one of the following letters based on its findings: a. A letter of finding indicating FT A did not find a violation of DOT's Title VI regulations. This letter will include an explanation of why FTA did not find a violation. If applicable, the letter may include a list of procedural violations or concerns, which will put RCTC on notice that certain practices are questionable and that without corrective steps, a future violation finding is possible. b. A letter of finding indicating RCTC is in violation of DOT's Title VI regulations. The letter will include each violation referenced to the applicable regulation, a brief description of proposed remedies, notice of the time limit on coming into compliance, the consequences of failure to achieve voluntary compliance, and an offer of assistance to RCTC in devising a remedial plan for compliance, if appropriate. FTA will administratively close Title VI complaints before a resolution is reached where (1) the complainant decides to withdraw the case; (2) the complainant is not responsive to FTA's requests for information or to sign a consent release form; (3) FTA has conducted or plans to conduct a related compliance review of the agency against which the complaint is lodged; (4) litigation has been filed • raising similar allegations involved in the complaint; (5) the complaint was not • filed within 180 days of the alleged discrimination; (6) the complaint does not indicate a possible violation of 49 CFR part 21; (7) the complaint is so weak, insubstantial, or lacking in detail that FTA determines it is without merit, or so replete with incoherent or unreadable statements that it, as a whole, cannot be considered to be grounded in fact; (8) the complaint has been investigated by another agency and the resolution of the complaint meets DOT regulatory standards; (9) the complaint allegations are foreclosed by previous decisions of the Federal courts, the Secretary, DOT policy determinations, or the U.S. DOT's Office of Civil Rights; (10) FTA obtains credible information that the allegations raised by the complaint have been resolved; (11) the complaint is a continuation of a pattern of previously filed complaints involving the same or similar allegations against the same recipient or other recipients that have been found factually or legally insubstantial by FTA; (12) the same complaint allegations have been filed with another Federal, state, or local agency, and FTA anticipates that the recipient will provide the complainant with a comparable resolution process under comparable legal standards; or (13) the death of the complainant or injured party makes it impossible to investigate the allegations fully. Tracking of Complaints As required by FT A, all written complaints received by RCTC's Deputy Executive Director, or designee, appeals to the Executive Director, or designee, and responses from these two offices will be retained by RCTC for 121 • " 111. " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT three years. In addition, a summary list of complaints will be tracked for five years as required. COMPLAINT FORM See Attachment A. 122 " " " ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT ATTACHMENT A: TITLE VI DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT FORM The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participating in or denied the benefits of its services on the basis of race, color, or national origin as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. Complaints must be filed within 180 days from the date of the alleged discrimination. The following information is necessary to assist RCTC in processing your complaint. If you require any assistance in completing this form, please contact the Civil Rights Officer, John Standiford, by calling (951) 787-7141. When completed, submit the original signed form or letter in person or by mail to: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Di.rector Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. 0. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 1. Contact Information: Complainant's Name: Address: City,State and Zip Code: FOR QUESTIONS OR ASSISTANCE IN OTHER ACCESSIBLE FORMATS SUCH AS LARGE PRINT, TDD, AUDIO, OR OTHER PLEASE CALL: (951) 787-7141 Telephone: ---------(home/work)---------(cell) What are the most convenient days and times for RCTC to contact you about this complaint? 2. Are you filing this complaint on your own behalf? Yes: __ _ No: __ _ If you answered yes, please go to question #3. If you answered no, please explain why you have filed for a third party: If you answered no, please confirm that you have obtained the permission of the aggrieved party if you are filing on behalf of a third party. Yes: No: __ _ 123 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT 3. Basis of discriminatory action(s): Check (v'') all categories below that apply to the act(s) of discrimination. I ~· I I ~~~nal Origin 4. Date and place of alleged discriminatory action(s): Include the earliest date of discrimination and the most recent date of discrimination: Date: ______ Location: ------------------------- Date: Location: ------------------------- 5. How were you discriminated against? Describe the nature of the action, decision, or conditions of the alleged discrimination. Explain as clearly as possible what happened and why you believe your protected status was a factor in the discrimination. Include how other persons were treated differently from you. (Attach additional page(s) if necessary). 6. Names of individuals responsible for the discriminatory action(s): 124 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT 7. Names of individuals (witnesses, fellow employees, supervisors, or others) whom we may contact for additional information to support or clarify your complains: Address Telephone No. 8. Has this complaint been filed with any other Federal, State, or local investigative agency? No o Yes o If "yes," please provide the following information: Agency: Contact Person: Address: Telephone No.: Date Filed: 9. Please provide any additional information that you believe would assist in the investigation: You may attach any written materials or other information that you think is relevant to your complaint. Please sign and date this form: Signature of Complainant Date 125 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT REQUISITOS DEL TiTULO VI RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION De acuerdo con las requisites del Tftulo VI de la Ley de Derechos Civiles de 1964 y del Circular 4702.1 B de la Administraci6n Federal de Transite (FTA par sus siglas en ingles), la Comisi6n de Transporte del Condado de Riverside (la Comisi6n) tiene que notificar a las beneficiaries sob re la protecci6n conforme al Tf tulo VI, elaborar las procedimientos para las quejas, asf coma crear un formulario de quejas. Estos documentos se consideran vitales y estan traducidos a otros idiomas distintos del ingles, segun sea necesario y en conformidad con la Directiva del Departamento de Transporte (DOT par sus siglas en ingles) sabre el Dominic Limitado del Ingles (LEP par sus siglas en ingles) y con el Plan de Asistencia de ldioma de la Comisi6n (LAP par sus siglas en ingles). I. POLiTICA Y AVISO AL PUBLICO Es una polftica de la Comisi6n de no discriminar o excluir a las individuos sabre la base de raza, color u origen nacional en la admisi6n a sus programas, servicios o actividades, en el acceso a ellos, en el tratamiento o en cualquier aspecto de las operaciones. La siguiente notificaci6n se publicara en la pagina web de la Comisi6n, se pondra en el area principal de la recepci6n y en las relevantes materiales publicados: La RCTC opera sus programas y servicios sin distinci6n de raza, color y origen nacional, en conformidad con el Titulo VI de la Ley de Derechos Civiles. Cualquier persona que cree que el o el/a ha sido agraviada par cualquier practica discriminatoria ilegal bajo el Titulo VI, puede presentar una queja a la RCTC. Para obtener mas informaci6n sabre el programa de Titulo VI de RCTC, y sabre las procedimientos para presentar una queja, /lame al (951) 787-7141; par correo electr6nico standifo@rctc.org; o visite nuestra oficina administrativa en 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. Para obtener mas informaci6n, Usted puede tambien visitar nuestro sitio web en www.rctc.om para obtener mas informaci6n y para descargar un formulario de queja en "About Us". El demandante puede presentar una queja directamente a la Administraci6n Federal de Transporte presentando la queja a la Oficina de Derechos Civiles, Atenci6n: Federal Transit Administration, Office of Civil Rights, Title VI Program Coordinator, East Building, 5th Floor -TCR, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590. Sise necesita la informaci6n en otro idioma, /lame al (951) 787-7141 . 126 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT II. PROCEDIMIENTOS PARA LA PRESENTACION, INVESTIGACION Y SEGUIMIENTO DE LAS QUEJAS Cualquier persona, grupo de individuos, o entidad que cree que ha sido objeto de discriminaci6n por motivos de raza, color u origen nacional, puede presentar una queja directamente o por media de un representante con la Comisi6n o con el DOT de la FT A. Presentaci6n de Queja a la RCTC Para presentar una queja con la RCTC, el demandante puede ponerse en contacto con la recepci6n principal at (951) 787-7141 para solicitar una copia del formulario de queja y los procedimientos, o visitar el sitio web en www.rctc.org para descargar el formulario de queja y los procedimientos. Cuando sea posible, el demandante debe llenar el formulario de queja, o proporcionar por escrito la informaci6n acerca de ta supuesta discriminaci6n que incluye lo siguiente: • Nombre del demandante; • Domicilio del demandante; • Numero de telefono del demandante; • • Fecha del incidente; • • Locaci6n del incidente; y • Descripci6n del incidente En los casos cuando el demandante no puede o es incapaz de proporcionar una declaraci6n escrita, el demandante puede ser entrevistado o ademas se le puede proporcionar un formulario de queja en medias alternatives, tales coma el audio o Braille. La queja debe ser presentada lo mas pronto posible, pero no mas tarde de 180 dfas calendarios despues de haber ocurrido la supuesta violaci6n, al Subdirector Ejecutivo por correo electr6nico a standifo@rctc.org, por correo postal, o en persona en la siguiente direcci6n: Riverside County Transportation Commission John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. 0. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Si la informaci6n proporcionada es insuficiente para llevar a cabo una investigaci6n o tomar una decision, la RCTC podra solicitar al demandante una informaci6n adicional. Al fallar el demandante a presentar la informaci6n adicional en el plazo senalado se puede considerar que existe una buena causa para cerrar administrativamente el caso por falta de un merito investigative. • 127 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Dentro de los 15 dfas calendarios despues de recibir una queja, el Subdirector Ejecutivo de la RCTC, o una persona designada, solicitara una entrevista con el demandante para discutir el supuesto incidente. Dentro de los 15 dfas calendarios despues de la discusion, la RCTC respondera por escrito, y cuando sea apropiado, en otro formato accesible al demandante. La respuesta explicara la posicion de la RCTC y ofrecera las opciones para la resolucion de la queja. Si el demandante no esta satisfecho con la decision del Subdirector Ejecutivo, o de su designado, puede ser presentada una apelacion dentro de los 15 df as calendarios despues de recibir la respuesta, al Director Ejecutivo de la RCTC. Dentro de los 15 dfas calendarios despues de recibir la apelacion, el Director Ejecutivo, o su designado, solicitaran una entrevista con el demandante para discutir el supuesto incidente. Dentro de los 15 dfas calendarios despues de la entrevista, el Director Ejecutivo o persona designada respondera por escrito y, cuando sea apropiado, en otro formato accesible al demandante, proveyendo una decision final de la queja. Presentaci6n de Queja a la FT A El demandante tiene derecho de presentar su queja directamente a la FT A, sin embargo, se recomienda a presentarla inicialmente con la RCTC. Como se describe en el Circular 4702.1 B de la FTA, Capftulo IX, para presentar una queja a la FTA tiene que presentarla dentro de 180 dfas despues de la fecha de la supuesta discriminacion, a menos que el plazo de presentarla este extendido por la FT A, a la direccion siguiente. Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights Title VI Program Coordinator East Building, 5th Floor -TCR 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Una vez aceptada la queja por la FTA para la investigacion, la FTA notificara a la RCTC que esta es objeto de una queja bajo el Tftulo VI y pedira a la RCTC a responder por escrito a las alegaciones del demandante. Si el demandante se pone de acuerdo de pasar la queja a la RCTC, la FTA proporcionara a la agencia la queja, en la cual la informacion personal puede ser redactada a peticion del demandante. Si el demandante no esta de acuerdo de pasar la queja a la RCTC, la FTA puede optar por cerrar la queja . 128 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT La FTA llevara a cabo una investigacion inmediata siempre que una revision de cumplimiento, informe, queja, o cualquier otra informacion indique un posible incumplimiento de las regulaciones del Titulo VI del DOT. La investigacion incluira, cuando sea apropiado, una revision de las pertinentes practicas y politicas del recipiente, las circunstancias bajo las cuales ha ocurrido el posible incumplimiento de las regulaciones del Titulo VI del DOT, y otros factores pertinentes a una determinacion en cuanto a si el recipiente no ha cumplido con las regulaciones del Titulo VI del DOT. Al concluir la FTA su investigacion, la Oficina de Derechos Civiles de la FTA mandara al demandante y a la RCTC una de las siguientes cartas basadas en sus conclusiones: a. Una carta sobre las conclusiones indicando que la FTA no ha encontrado ninguna violacion de las regulaciones del Titulo VI del DOT. Esta carta incluira una explicacion de por que la FTA no ha encontrado ninguna violacion. Cuando sea apropiado, la carta puede incluir una lista de violaciones o problemas de procedimiento que notifique a la RCTC de que ciertas practicas son cuestionables y que, sin medidas correctivas, es posible encontrar una violacion en el future. b. Una carta sobre las conclusiones indicando que la RCTC esta en violacion de las regulaciones del Titulo VI del DOT. La carta incluira cada violacion referente a la regulacion aplicable, una breve descripci6n de las soluciones propuestas, una notificacion sobre el plazo para llegar al cumplimiento, las consecuencias por falta de lograr un cumplimiento voluntario, y una oferta de asistencia a la RCTC en la elaboracion del plan de medidas para el cumplimiento, cuando sea apropiado. La FT A va a cerrar administrativamente los cases de quejas de Titulo VI antes de resolverlos cuando (1) el demandante decida a retirar el caso; (2) el demandante no responde a las solicitudes de la FTA para proveer la informacion o para firmar un formulario de consentimiento; (3) la FTA ha llevado a cabo o planea de llevar a cabo una revision analoga de cumplimiento de la agencia contra la cual se ha presentado la queja; (4) ha sido presentado un litigio con las acusaciones similares a las de la queja; (5) la queja no fue presentada dentro de los 180 dias de la supuesta discriminacion; (6) la queja no indica ninguna posible violacion de la parte 21 del titulo 49 del CFR (Codigo de Violaciones Federales por sus siglas en ingles); (7) la queja es tan debil, insustancial, o carece de detalles que la FTA determina que esta carece de merito, o, puesto que la queja esta llena de las declaraciones incoherentes o ilegibles, en su totalidad, no se puede considerarla ser basada en los hechos; (8) la queja ha sido investigada por otra agencia y la resolucion de la queja cumple con las normas regulatorias del DOT; (9) las alegaciones de la queja son excluidos por las anteriores decisiones de las Cortes Federales, del Secretario, por las resoluciones de 129 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT polftica del DOT ode la Oficina de Derechos Civiles del DOT de los EE.UU.; (10) la FT A recibe una informaci6n creible de que las alegaciones planteados por la queja han sido resueltas; (11) la queja es una continuaci6n de un patron de las quejas presentadas anteriormente que implican las mismas o similares alegaciones contra el mismo recipiente u otros recipientes y la FT A ya determine estas quejas ser insustanciales de hecho o legalmente; (12) las mismas alegaciones en la queja se han presentado con otra agencia Federal, estatal o local, y la FTA anticipa que el recipiente proporcione al demandante un proceso de resoluci6n comparable bajo las normas legales comparables; o (13) la muerte de la parte demandante o lesionada hace imposible investigar las alegaciones completamente. Seguimiento de las Quejas Segun se requiere por la FT A, todas las quejas recibidas por escrito por el Subdirector Ejecutivo de la RCTC, o por un designado, todas las apelaciones al Director Ejecutivo, o designado, asi como las respuestas de estas dos oficinas seran retenidas por la RCTC durante tres anos. Ademas, se llevara a cabo un seguimiento de lista resumen de las quejas durante cinco anos, como sea necesario. II. FORMULARIO DE QUEJA Vea el Anexo A. 130 " " " A TT AC HM ENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT ANEXOA: FORMULARIO DE QUEJAS DE TiTULO VI SOBRE LA DISCRIMINACION La Comisi6n de Transporte del Condado de Riverside (RCTC) se ha comprometido a garantizar que ninguna persona sea excluida de la participaci6n o que a nadie se le denieguen los beneficios de sus servicios sobre la base de raza, color u origen nacional segun esta previsto en el Tltulo VI de la Ley Derechos Civiles de 1964, en su version modificada. Las quejas deben ser presentadas dentro de los 180 dias a partir de la fecha de la supuesta discriminaci6n. La siguiente informaci6n es necesaria para ayudar a la RCTC para el tramite de su queja. Si necesita alguna ayuda para llenar este formulario, por favor comuniquese con el Oficial de Derechos Civiles, John Standiford, llamando al (951) 787-7141. Al llenar el formulario, someta el original firmado o la carta en persona o por correo a: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. 0. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 1. lnformaci6n de Contacto: Nombre del Demandante: Domicilio: Ciudad,Estado y C6digo Postal: PARA LAS PREGUNTAS 0 ASISTENCIA EN OTROS FORMATOS ACCESIBLES COMO LOS DE LETRA GRANDE, TDD, AUDIO U OTRA POR FAVOR LLAME: (951) 787-7141 Telefono: ---------(casa/trabajo) _________ (celular) lCuales son los dias y las horas mas convenientes para que la RCTC se comunique con Usted acerca de su quaja?----------------------------------~ 2. 2. {,Esta Ud. presentando esta queja en su propio nombre? Si: __ _ No: __ _ Si contest6 "Si'', favor de pasar a la cuesti6n N�3. Si contest6 "No", favor de explicar por que Ud. esta presentandola por un tercero: Si contest6 "No", por favor confirme que Ud. ha obtenido un permiso de la parte perjudicada en caso de que Ud. esta presentando en nombre de un tercero. Si: No: __ _ 131 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT 3. Bases de la acci6n(es) discriminatoria(s}: Marque (v'') abajo todas las categorias que aplican al hecho (s) de la discriminaci6n. a. Raza b. Color c. Origen Nacional 4. Fecha y lugar de la (s) acci6n (es) discriminatoria (s) presunta (s): lncluya la fecha mas temprana de la discriminaci6n y la fecha mas reciente de la discriminaci6n: Fecha: ------Lugar:------------------------- Fecha: Lugar:------------------------ 5. G.C6mo ha sido discriminado Usted? Describa la naturaleza de la acci6n, decision, o las condiciones de la presunta discriminaci6n. Explique lo mas claramente posible que ha sucedido y porque Usted cree que su estado protegido fue un factor en su discriminaci6n. lncluya c6mo otras personas fueron tratados de la forma distinta de la de Usted. (Si necesite, adjunte pagina (s) adicional (es). 6. Nombres de los individuos responsables por la (s} acci6n (es) discriminatoria (s): 132 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT 7. Nombres de los individuos (testigos, empleados compaiieros, supervisores, u otros) a quienes les podamos contactar para una informaci6n adicional para apoyar o clarificar sus quejas: Nombre Direcci6n No. De Telefono 8. lHa sido presentada esta queja con cualquier otra agencia de investigaci6n Federal, Estatal o local? No o Si o Si "si," favor de proveer la informaci6n siguiente: Agencia: Persona de Contacto: Direcci6n: N� de Telefono.: Fecha de presentaci6n: 9. Favor de proveer cualquier otra informaci6n adicional que Usted cree pueda asistir en la investigaci6n: Ud. puede adjuntar cualquier material escrito o cualquier otra informaci6n que Usted piensa que es relevante para su queja. Favor de firmar y fechar este formulario: Firma del demandante Fee ha 133 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT • APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN • • 134 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Riverside County Transportation Commission Public Participation Plan Prepared for the Federal Transit Administration In accordance with Circular 4702.lB Commission Approved on March 11, 2015 (Pending) Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501 If information is needed in another language, please contact (951) 787-7141 for free translation services. Sise neceisita este document en Espanol, Ila me al 951-787-7141 para servicios de traducci6n gratuitos . 136 A TI ACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT • Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Background of RCTC ................................................................................................................................. 2 Purposes of this Plan ................................................................................................................................ 2 Desired Outcomes .................................................................................................................................... 3 Federal and State Requirements .............................................................................................................. 3 Public Participation Background ............................................................................................................... 4 II. Riverside County Demographics ............................................................................................................... 2 Minority Individuals .................................................................................................................................. 2 LEP Individuals .......................................................................................................................................... 3 RCTC's Stakeholders ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Ill. Public Participation Strategies and Tools ................................................................................................. 7 Public Participation Goals and Strategies ................................................................................................. 7 Project Specific Public Participation ......................................................................................................... 9 Updating the Public Participation Plan ..................................................................................................... 9 IV. Summary of Public Participation Activities ............................................................................................ 10 Transit-Related Public Participation ....................................................................................................... 10 • Capital-RelatedPublic Participation ........................................................................................................ 11 RCTC's Website ....................................................................................................................................... 12 V. Contact information ................................................................................................................................ 13 VI. Attachments .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Demographic Maps of Minority Populations in Riverside County ......................................................... 14 • 137 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT I. Introduction Background of RCTC The Commission was established in 1976 by the State of California (State) to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County. The governing body consists of all five members of the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's 28 cities, and one non-voting member appointed by the Governor of California. It is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) and County Transportation Commission (CTC). Its responsibilities include setting policies, establishing priorities, coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and local jurisdictions. RCTC's capital projects, motorist aid services and transit-related programs and projects are funded with various local, state, and federal sources. Local funding sources consist of the Measure A, the countywide sales tax; Debt proceeds, derived from issuing bonds; and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), derived from developer impact fees. State funding sources for projects are derived from the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). RCTC also receives apportionments of federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); and FTA Small Starts and Sections 5307, 5309, 5337 formula funds. The Commission is unique in that it is not a transit provider like many other CTCs, however, does receive FTA formula funds (under the Rail Program) for transfer and expenditure for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA or Metrolink). Regardless of funding source, RCTC is committed to ensuring that its projects and services are delivered and implemented in a non-discriminatory manner. Purpose of this Plan This Public Participation Plan (Plan) is intended to satisfy Title VI requirements as expressed in FTA Circular 4702.lB. Recipients are required to promote inclusive public participation and seek out and consider the needs and input of the general public, including interested parties and those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems, such as minority and limited-English Proficient (LEP) persons. The Public Participation Plan is the established process or plan that describes the proactive strategies, procedures, and desired outcomes of a recipient's public participation activities. This Plan will provide direction for the Commission's public processes by allowing public input for the planning process and for RCTC's programs, projects, and activities to all members of Riverside County, including citizens, organizations, and public agencies. Finally, it will develop specific strategies inclusive of low-income, minority, LEP populations, and underrepresented individuals . 138 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT RCTC developed this Plan by considering the demographic analysis of the population(s) affected, the type of plan, program, and/or service under consideration, and the resources available to the Commission. Desired Outcomes This Plan details RCTC's public participation goals, as well as strategies that will be implemented to assist meeting these goals. From these efforts, the Commission anticipates the following outcomes: • Increased access to early, meaningful, and continual engagement in the transportation planning process for all individuals in Riverside County. • Implementation of proactive strategies to bring enhanced awareness and increased access for minority individuals, LEP individuals, low-income individuals and additional underrepresented and underserved individuals. • Participation and representation from a diverse range or perspectives. Federal and State Requirements Title VI and Federal Authority Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects persons in the United States from being excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Under the DOT, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements for implementing Title VI include the adoption of a Title VI Program report, including a Public Participation Plan, pursuant to FTA Circular 4702.lB, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. Public Hearing Requirements Public hearing requirements may vary by project or program. The Commission may conduct a public hearing for a variety of reasons such as approval of the Program of Projects under the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); to discuss and present the proposed location; or significant changes to right of way and major design features, social and environmental effects of a proposed project that is funded with state and federal funds. Capital projects, for instance, will comply with Caltrans' Project Development Procedures Manual, Chapter 11 Public Hearing requirements; whereas, FTIP projects would follow the public participation requirements stipulated under the existing transportation legislation, MAP 21. 139 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Public Participation Background RCTC's traditionally seeks public involvement for both capital projects and transit-related projects. The public is most familiar with RCTC for its capital projects. The various regional capital projects that RCTC is involved in throughout the County include the following: ./ State Route 60/215 East Junction Project ./ State Route 60 Truck Climbing Lanes ./ State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ./ Interstate 15 Corridor Improvement Project ./ State Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle Project ./ Widening of State Route 71 ./ Mid-County Parkway ./ State Route 91/71 Interchange Project ./ Realignment of State Route 79 ./ Interstate 10 Truck Climbing Lanes ./ Widening of State Route 74 ./ Interstate 10/ State Route 60 Interchange ./ Widening of Interstate 1-215 ./ Interstate 215 Bi-County Project ./ Expansion of Metrolink from Riverside to Perris A specialized outreach plan is designed for each project and may include community meetings, open houses, charrettes, and formal public hearings .. Transit-related projects that involve public participation may include: " The Coordination Plan Process " The Citizen Advisory Committee, RCTC Social Services Transportation Advisory Committee " The Annual Transit Needs Hearing " The FTIP Program of Projects " 211 " Park and Ride " Rideshare 140 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT II. Riverside County Demographics Riverside County is the fourth largest county in California by area and population, and is diverse in geographies and populations. According to the 2010 Census, Riverside County covers 7,208 square miles with a population of 2,189,641. Many of the populations important to this Plan-minority, underrepresented, low-income individuals- were described in detail in the 2012 Update to the Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan for Riverside County. The Coordination Plan targets disabled, senior, and low-income populations and lent considerable time to documenting the changes over time within these groups. The following summary findings are of relevance as RCTC considers its approach to public participation. • The overall County population experienced a 40 percent increase between 2000 and 2012. • The adult population ages 18-64 increased by more than 45 percent, adding 400,000 individuals. Adults in these age groups represents almost 60 percent of the county's total population numbering almost 1.3 million persons. • Low-income adults are the fastest growing group in Riverside County, increasing by 46 percent since the 2000 Census, adding almost 52,000 individuals and representing 7.6 percent of the current population. • Adults with disabilities total almost nine percent of the adult population and five percent of then County's total population at 110,000 persons. • The older adult population ages 65 or older has increased by nearly 30 percent, adding 58,000 persons. This represents 11.7% percent ofthe total population and almost 253,000 persons. • Youngest seniors, ages 65 to 74 are the largest senior group representing 54 percent of all seniors. • Oldest seniors, ages 85 and older, are the fastest growing group, increasing at a rate of almost SO percent. • The 2010 ACS estimates indicate that seniors are reporting some form of disability are almost one-third of all seniors; as a group, represent more than four percent of the Riverside County's total population. Most frequently reported, among older persons with disabilities are those seniors who have difficulty walking and living independently. Minority Individuals RCTC conducted demographic analysis of minority populations in the aggregate to understand where these communities are located throughout the County. This analysis was done at the Census Tract and Block Group levels using 2013 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, the most reliable and current Census source providing minority information at the Census Tract and Block Group levels. FTA Title VI guidance defines minority person as an individual of any of the following groups: American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders. 141 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Demographic maps are provided in Attachment A, based upon minority population count tabulations developed for each Riverside County census tract. These were derived by subtracting the Caucasian population from each tract to arrive at the non-white, minority population counts. A summary of findings is provided below. " In Western Riverside County, there are pockets of minority populations throughout the region. The largest concentrations of minority populations, between 59.2 to 84.3% of the population at the Census block group level, are found along the western border of the County near Norco and Rubidoux; near Moreno Valley; east of Banning; and in the south portion of the region, near Murrieta. " In East Riverside County, most of the region has a minority population of 34.3% to 45.6% of the total population at the block group level. A more concentrated minority population is located on the North Shore of the Salton Sea. " Coachella Valley is also home to many minority persons, with the largest concentrations of minority persons located north of Cabazon, north of Cathedral City and Thousand Palms and south of Thermal. In these pockets, minority persons make up 59.2 to 84.3% of the block group population of these areas . LEP Individuals As documented in RCTC's Language Assistance Plan (LAP), Riverside County is home to many LEP populations, several of which meet the Department of Justice's Safe Harbor Provision. The Safe Harbor provision stipulates that written translation of vital documents for each eligible LEP language are to be provided if the group constitute 5% or 1,000 person, whichever is less, of the total population of persons eligible to be served or likely to be affected or encountered, then such action will be considered strong evidence of compliance with the recipient's written translation obligation. RCTC's Language Assistance Plan details how RCTC will provide language assistance to these populations. This information is included here to further detail the diverse populations that comprise Riverside County. Table 1 below provides information from the 2013 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, the most reliable and current Census source for accessing LEP information. There are a total of 38 LEP groups in Riverside County numbering 324,583 individuals or 15.7% of Riverside County's total population. The largest group of LEP individuals is Spanish speakers, who number 271,452 individuals and comprise 13.13% of the County's total population. LEP groups with over 1,000 persons are highlighted in blue in Table 1 and include individuals that speak Cambodian, Chinese, lndic languages, Japanese, Korean, Mon-Khmer (Cambodian), Pacific Islander languages, Persian, Spanish, Tagalog, Thai, and Vietnamese. Besides Spanish, none of these LEP populations comprise 5% of the County's total population . 142 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT A thorough analysis of LEP populations in the County was conducted to develop RCTC's Language Assistance Plan, consistent with FTA guidance. This analysis found that Spanish-speaking LEPs are the LEP population most frequently contacting RCTC and accessing RCTC's programs and services. 143 • • • " " " A TI ACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Table 1, Riverside County LEP Populations B16001: LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME BY ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH FOR THE POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Riverside County, California "very well" French Creole: Speak English less than ''very well" Italian: Speak English less than "very well" Portuguese or Portuguese Creole: Speak English less than "very well" German: Speak English less than "very well" Yiddish: Speak English less than "very welt" Other West Germanic languages: Speak English less than "very well" Scandinavian languages: Speak English less than ''very well" Greek: English less than "very well" Russian: Speak English less than "very well" Polish: Speak English less than "very well" Serbo-Croatian: Speak English less than "very well" Other Slavic languages: Speak English less than "very well" Armenian: Speak En lish less than �ve well" Other Native North American languages: Speak English less than "very well" Hungarian: Speak English less than "very well" c~ Hebrew: Speak English less than "very well" African language: Speak English less than "very well" Estimate 65 465 470 840 17 290 71 143 687 464 196 87 174 169 508 Other and unspecified languages: Speak English less 246 than "very well" 144 "lo or Total Population 100.00% 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% 0.04% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.03% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% 0.02% 0.01% Margin of Error +l-77 +/-175 +l-207 +/-190 +/-24 +/-119 +l-55 +l-77 +/-251 +/-252 +/-101 +/-70 +/-67 +/-241 +/-226 +/-162 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT RCTC's Stakeholders Stakeholders are individuals, groups, organizations or agencies that may be directly or indirectly affected by a plan, recommendations of that plan, or a project. RCTC seeks to engage all stakeholders through its public participation efforts, particularly those who may be adversely affected or who may be denied benefit of a plan's recommendation(s). Stakeholders include: " General public, minority individuals, low-income individuals, LEP persons, persons with disabilities, and older adults; " University and college students, including those at: Brandman University, Riverside California Southern Law School, California State University, San Bernardino, Palm Desert Campus, California State University, San Marcos, Temecula Satellite Campus, La Sierra University, Mayfield College, Mt. San Jacinto College, Palo Verde College, Riverside Community College, Santa Barbara Business College, University of California, Riverside, and University of Phoenix; " High school students throughout Riverside County; " Non-profit organizations including Blindness Support Services, Care Connexus, Care-a-Van, CASA, Friends of Moreno Valley, Inland AIDS Project, Operation SafeHouse, among others; " Public agencies including city governments and health and human services throughout Riverside County; " Public transit operators: Corona Cruiser, City of Riverside Special Services, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency, Riverside Transit Agency, Sun line Transit Agency, Pass Transit; and " Private organizations and businesses . 145 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Ill. Public Participation Strategies and Tools Public Participation Goals and Strategies This section details RCTC public participation goals and strategies for achieving each goal. Goal 1: Provide all interested parties and agencies reasonable opportunities for involvement in the transportation planning process. Strategies " Provide adequate public notice of public participation opportunities and activities and time for public review of regionally significant plans and documents. " Utilize all channels of outreach for promoting public participation opportunities including RCTC's website, the Citizen Advisory Council/ Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (CAC/SSTAC), Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG), transit providers, and social media. " Evaluate plans, programs, and projects to determine the most appropriate and effective tools and strategies for public and agency involvement and outreach. " Provide opportunities to comment on draft planning documents to affected agencies and parties. " Make transportation planning documents available for viewing on the RCTC website and at key locations throughout the county, as appropriate. " During the transportation planning process, RCTC shall conduct open public meetings in accordance with the Brown Act (CGC Sec.54950 et seq). Goal 2: Ensure accessibility to the transportation planning process and information for all members of the community; ensure that a wide range of perspectives will be heard so that planning outcomes reflect the needs of the region's diverse communities. Strategies " Develop information materials that are easily understood and translated for appropriate audiences and make them accessible at meetings and on RCTC's website. " Make notices and announcements attractive and eye-catching. " Plan workshops and/or public hearings at convenient venues and times across the region; ensure venues are accessible to the public. " When appropriate provide information on regionally significant plans and projects to the local media for distribution and promotion. " Maintain the RCTC website with current transportation planning activities, including reports, plans, agendas and minutes for RCTC Commission meetings . 146 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT • When appropriate, present information about specific plans and projects at public forums, such as City Council and Board of Supervisors meetings for increased public and governmental awareness. • When identifying locations for community outreach activities, prioritize locations that are accessible by public transit. • Make every effort to accommodate requests for accessibility opportunities, including physical accessibility to public meetings as well as accessibility to information in LEP languages and alternative formats. • Encourage early involvement in the transportation planning process by providing timely notification and access to information • Utilize citizen and/or agency advisory groups as a means of providing input to the transportation planning process. • Identify key individuals, organizations, and community organizations that may be interested in or affected by a plan or program; include this list in any mail or email distribution. • Collaborate with Riverside County Transit Providers to facilitate and promote public participation opportunities. • Maintain the Riverside County Transportation Network, a list of key stakeholders updated on an annual basis, through a mail survey and e-survey. The 961 agencies and organizations on the Network include non-profits, human and social services, private transportation companies, public agencies, specialized transit providers. Goal 3: Engage and increase opportunities for participation for those traditionally underrepresented and or underserved, including low-income, minority, persons with disabilities, and Limited English Proficiency populations Strategies • Make commenting on plans convenient and accessible to the public and stakeholders; enable comments to be made at public meetings and workshops, via email or on line commenting forms or by telephone. • Offer vital information, such as notices and announcements, in alternative languages as appropriate and feasible. When considering translation and interpretation needs, the RCTC Language Assistance Plan will be consulted for strategies and procedures. Translated information shall be made available on the RCTC or project-specific website, at public meetings and workshops and at key locations across the county as appropriate and feasible. • Translated notices, announcements, and other vital information should be posted on Riverside County transit operators' buses and at transfer centers, as is possible. • When appropriate, utilize alternative media outlets that may target minority, LEP, or underserved segments of the community. • Continue expanding the contact list with agencies, organizations and stakeholders that work with LEP communities. 147 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Project Specific Public Participation The project team, including Project Manager and public relations staff is responsible for developing an appropriate public participation plan or public outreach plan that describes the strategies that will be used to communicate key information to agencies, organizations, elected officials, residents, business operators, commuters, emergency responders and other project stakeholders. Outreach activities will be integrated with the technical work program to provide information and incorporate ideas and feedback. The input that is received will facilitate fully informed decisions by RCTC Commissioners at key decision points. These plans will be specifically tailored to the individual project and the communities are interested in and may be affected by the project and will comply with Title VI and other relevant guidance Title VI requirements, including strategies for engaging LEP individuals, will be documented in all bid- related materials. Updating the Public Participation Plan RCTC's public participation goals and strategies will be reviewed as necessary and results will be considered in preparation of the three year Title VI Program adoption. Based on the effectiveness of strategies and the potential changes to Riverside County's demographics and outreach resources, strategies may be modified and new strategies may be added to enhance the public participation process. The following indicators may be used in reviewing and determining the effectiveness of these goals and strategies. " Number of newspaper ads, public notices " Number of press releases, public service announcements, and news articles " Number of public meetings and workshops " Number and demographics of participants at public meetings and workshops " Number of hits to the RCTC website and project-specific websites " Number of comments received during the public comment period for projects and programs " Number of requests for translated materials " Number and content of materials translation " Revisions to plans or projects based on public and agency input; how comments influenced the planning process 148 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT IV. Summary of Public Participation Activities FTA Title VI guidance requires a summary of outreach efforts made since the last Title VI Program submission. As this is RCTC's first Title VI Program submission, the following is a summary of transit- related and capital project-related public outreach in the last three years. Transit-Related Public Participation Annual Public Hearing on Transit Needs is Riverside County As required by Section 99238.5 of the California Public Utilities Code, The Commission holds an annual public hearing to solicit the input of transit dependent and transit disadvantaged persons. Written and Oral comments provided at the hearing are used by RCTC and the County's transit operators in identifying transit needs in preparation of transportation plans and programs, including the Regional Transportation Plan and Short Range Transit Plans. The comments are also shared with transit and paratransit operators as they relate to operating issues and needs. Additionally, comments are shared with other agencies that provide transportation services to transit dependent populations, including the Coordinated Transportation Services Agencies and the County Office on Aging. 2014's public hearing was held on October 2 at Sunline Transit Agency. Over 40 persons were in attendance. Coordination Plan 2012 Outreach During the Coordination Planning process four workshops were held in January 2012 in the various areas of Riverside County: • Blythe for the Palo Verde Valley • Palm Desert for the Coachella Valley • City of Riverside for Western Riverside • Wildomar for Southwestern Riverside County The workshop included inviting comment regarding transportation needs from transit users and potential transit users, agency staff working with the target populations, and the general public. The workshops were promoted through flyers and half-sheet seat drop flyers, in both English and Spanish. Flyers were posted in buses of across many of the County's transit routes. They were also distributed through an email blast to the Riverside County Transportation Network which includes non profits, human and social services, private transportation companies, public agencies, specialized transit providers. North Shore Salton Sea Project Development Workshops Also part of the 2012 Coordination Plan Process, RCTC met with residents of the North Shore community ofthe Salton Sea to discuss unmet transit needs and develop responsive solutions. The North Shore is an 149 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT isolated, rural, and agricultural region of the Salton Sea in Riverside County. Many residents are agricultural workers and need to travel long distances to work in the fields throughout the area. Other families depend on jobs in the hospitality sector on the west side of the Coachella Valley and many of their children attend the College of the Desert Campus located in Palm Desert. For some, the daily commute can be 36 miles each way. Simultaneous translation was provided at the meeting to allow RCTC staff and the predominately Spanish-speaking community members to interact. These meetings resulted in the implementation of a volunteer driver reimbursement program. Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) /Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) RCTC recently revamped the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) appointing 10 members in September 2014. The CAC serves as RCTC's Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) assisting the Commission in complying with Transportation Development Act (TDA) Section 99238. The TDA provides direction for administering both Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance funds for bus and commuter rail services. This funding promotes transportation service improvements and enhancements that support the mobility of older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons of limited means. Additionally, the role of CAC/SSTAC members is to establish an effective communication exchange among Riverside County's public transit operators, its specialized transportation providers, and representatives of its transit dependent population regarding matters of mutual concern. Riverside County Transportation Network The Riverside County Transportation Network is a list of key stakeholders and includes 661 agencies and organizations. These entities are non-profits, human and social services, private transportation companies, public agencies, specialized transit providers that work with a diverse range of clients throughout Riverside County. The Network is updated on an annual basis, through a mail survey and e- survey. Transit-Related information, notices, announcements-particularly public participation opportunities-are sent to this Network via emails and physical mail, when those addresses exist. Capital-Related Public Participation RCTC undertakes extensive and innovative public participation and outreach for its large infrastructure projects. In fact, the Commission was recently awarded the 2014 Award of Merit for Public Outreach by the American Planning Association (APA) for its active public outreach campaign for the 91 Project. This project involved relocating long-time senior residents of the Buena Vista Mobile Manor. For its sensitivity to these older adults and engaging them early and meaningfully the project, RCTC was also awarded the 2014 Excellence in Communications Award of Distinction from the California Public Information Officers and the 2014 Best Practices Award from the American Planning Association . 150 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Public participation efforts undertaken in recent months include: • University of California, Riverside Neighborhood Meeting: Perris Valley Line Project • Green River Home Owner's Association: 91 Project • City of Perris -Perris Valley Line Project • We are Temescal Valley: 1-15 Express Lanes Project • Coachella Valley Economic Summit • Menifee City Council: 1-215 Central Project • Banning City Hall Public Meeting: Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Corridor Rail Service • CVAG Public Meeting: Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Corridor Rail Service Project-specific Public Outreach Plans were developed for many current capital projects, including: • Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project • Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Corridor Rail Service Project • Interstate 215 Central Project • State Route 91 Project Websites have been developed for many capital projects. Project website contain fact sheets, project timelines, and provide opportunity for feedback. Websites for current projects include: • 1-15 project • State Route 91 Project • Perris Valley Line RCTC's Website RCTC's website is kept up-to-date with current information and notices for all projects and activities. Website information is provided on all printed materials. The Commission also maintains an active Twitter account to enhance its public outreach. This account posts on road closures, project updates, and public participation activities, among other notices. 151 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT V. Contact information RCTC will post the Public Participation Plan on its website at www.rctc.org. The Plan may be translated in any language for free upon request. Any questions or comments regarding this Plan should be directed to: Riverside County Transportation Commission John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. 0. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Phone: (951) 787-7141 Email: standifo@rctc.org 152 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT • VI. Attachments Demographic Maps of Minority Populations in Riverside County • • 153 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Figure 1: Western Riverside County Minority Population 154 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Figure 2: East Riverside County Minority Population • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Figure 3: Coachella Valley Minority Population 156 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT • APPENDIX C: LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE PLAN • • 158 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Riverside County Transportation Commission Language Assistance Plan Prepared for the Federal Transit Administration In accordance with Circular 4702.lB Commission Approved on March 11, 2015 (Pending) Riverside County Tronsportot ion Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501 If information is needed in another language, please contact (951) 787-7141 for free translation services. Sise neceisita este document en Espanol, !lame al 951-787-7141 para servicios de traducci6n gratuitos . 160 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Table of Contents • I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Background of RCTC ................................................................................................................................. 1 Purposes of this Plan ................................................................................................................................ 2 Title VI and Federal Authority ................................................................................................................... 2 Language Assistance Goals ....................................................................................................................... 2 II. Four Factor Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 4 Factor One: The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Factor Two: The frequency with which LEP persons come into contact with the program .................... 6 Factor Three: The nature and importance of the program, activity, or service to people's lives ............ 7 Factor Four: The resources available to the recipient for LEP outreach .................................................. 7 Discussion of Results ................................................................................................................................ 8 Ill. Implementation Plan ................................................................................................................................ 9 Language Service Provision ...................................................................................................................... 9 StaffTraining ........................................................................................................................................... 10 IV. Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the LAP ..................................................................................... 11 V. Contact information ................................................................................................................................ 12 • • 161 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT I. Introduction Background of RCTC The Commission was established in 1976 by the State of California (State) to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County. The governing body consists of all five members of the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's 28 cities, and one non-voting member appointed by the Governor of California. It is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) and County Transportation Commission (CTC). Its responsibilities include setting policies, establishing priorities, coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and local jurisdictions. The public is most familiar with RCTC for its capital projects and motorist aid services. The various regional capital projects that RCTC is involved in throughout the County include the following: ,/ State Route 60/215 East Junction Project ,/ Expansion of Metrolink from Riverside to ,/ State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Perris Project ,/ State Route 60 Truck Climbing Lanes ,/ State Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle ,/ Interstate 15 Corridor Improvement Project Project ,/ Widening of State Route 71 ,/ Mid-County Parkway ,/ State Route 91/71 Interchange Project ,/ Realignment of State Route 79 ,/ Interstate 10 Truck Climbing Lanes ,/ Widening of State Route 74 ,/ Interstate 10/ State Route 60 Interchange ,/ Widening of Interstate 1-215 ,/ Interstate 215 Bi-County Project The Commission also provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. These services include the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a program that provides call box service for motorists; the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP), a roving tow truck service that assists motorists with disabled vehicles on the main highways of the County during peak rush hour traffic periods; and Inland Empire 511 (IE511), a traveler information system. RCTC's capital projects, motorist aid services and transit-related programs and projects are funded with various local, state, and federal sources. Local funding sources consist of Measure A, the countywide sales tax; Debt proceeds, derived from issuing bonds; and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), derived from developer impact fees. State funding sources for projects are derived from the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). RCTC also receives apportionments of federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); and FTA Small Starts and Sections 5307, 5309, 5337 formula funds. The Commission is unique in that it is not a transit provider like many other CTCs, however, does receive FTA formula funds (under the Rail Program) for transfer and expenditure for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA or Metrolink) . 162 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Regardless of funding source, RCTC is committed to ensuring that its projects and services are delivered and implemented in a non-discriminatory manner. Purpose of this Plan The Language Assistance Plan (LAP) is intended to satisfy FTA Title VI requirements related to limited- English Proficient (LEP) individuals. FTA Circular 4702.lB states that "recipients shall take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to benefits, services, information, and other important portions of their programs and activities for individuals who are limited-English proficient {LEP)." LEP persons refers to persons for whom English is not their primary language and who have a limited ability to read, write, speak, or understand English. It includes people who reported to the U.S. Census that they speak English less than very well, not well, or not at all. The LAP details the process by which RCTC will provide access to LEP individuals and the larger community. RCTC utilized the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) LEP Guidance Handbook and performed a Four Factor Analysis to develop this LAP. Title VI and Federal Authority Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects persons in the United States from being excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Under the DOT, FTA's requirements for implementing Title VI include the adoption of a Title VI Program report pursuant to FTA Circular 4702.18, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. As a recipient of FTA Funds, RCTC has developed its own Language Assistance Plan in compliance with FTA Circular 4702.18 and through consultation with the FTA's Office of Civil Rights' LEP Guidance Handbook: The FTA's Office of Civil Rights' Implementing the Department of Transportation's Policy Guidance Concerning Recipients' Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient (LEP} Persons: A Handbook for Public Transportation Providers (April 13, 2007). Language Assistance Goals The following goals will guide RCTC in ensuring that projects and services are delivered and implemented in a non-discriminatory manner: 1. Ensure meaningful access to all individuals regardless of race, color, national origin, and language of origin through outreach to LEP populations, translation of vital documents into LEP languages, and provision of additional language assistance services, as required; 2. Monitor changing LEP population demographics as necessary to ensure RCTC provides appropriate language assistance services; 163 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT 3. Update this Language Assistance Plan as necessary to ensure the effectiveness of strategies for providing language assistance . 164 " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT II. Four Factor Analysis Recipients are required to take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to benefits, services, information, and other important portions of its programs or activities for persons who are limited- English proficient (LEP). FTA Circular 4702.lB details the components of the LAP, including the Four Factor Analysis, which provides a careful analysis of LEP individuals the recipient may encounter to determine the specific language services that are appropriate to provide. The Four Factor Analysis balances the following factors: " Factor One: The Number and proportions of LEP persons in the jurisdiction; " Factor Two: How often LEP persons come into contact with RCTC services; " Factor Three: How important RCTC's services are to LEP persons lives; " Factor Four: The resources available to RCTC for LEP outreach that can reasonably be provided. The results of the four-factor analysis are used to determine the target LEP populations and the best methods of engaging with the public. RCTC undertook the Four Factor Analysis in order to develop an appropriate and effective Language Assistance Plan Factor One: The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or " likely to be encountered " RCTC's service area incorporates all of Riverside County, which has a total population of 2,067,363 individuals according to American Community Survey (ACS) 2013 5-year estimates. ACS Census data was used for this analysis as it provides the most current and reliable information about LEP individuals. The Department of Justice's Safe Harbor Provision, which was accepted by the FTA, stipulates that written translation of vital documents for each eligible LEP language group that constitutes 5% or 1,000 persons, whichever is less, of the total population of persons eligible to be served or likely to be affected or encountered, shall be considered strong evidence of compliance with the recipient's written translation obligation. Table 1 below provides information from the 2013 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates demonstrating the 38 LEP populations in Riverside County. The largest group of LEP individuals is Spanish-speakers, who comprise 13% of the County's population and number 271,452 individuals. Although, no other LEP group reaches 5% of the population, 11 additional LEP groups have over 1,000 persons, which include: Arabic, Cambodian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Other lndic languages, Other Pacific Island languages, Persian, Spanish, Tagalog, Thai, and Vietnamese . 165 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Table 1, Riverside County LEP Populations 816001: LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME BY ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH FOR THE Riverside County, California POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER 2009·2013 American Community Survey 5·Year Estimates other and unspecified languages: Speak English less 246 than "very well" 166 0.01% +t-n +/-1 5 +l-201 +/..190 +l-24 +/-119 +/-162 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT As all individuals residing in the county may be commuters, transit riders, and pedestrians, the total population is eligible to be served by the Commission 1 s services. The following section addresses which LEP persons the Commission is likely to encounter based on the past frequency of contact. Factor Two: The frequency with which LEP persons come into contact with the program To identify and analyze the frequency with which LEP persons come into contact with these programs, RCTC distributed a survey to staff who regularly interact with members of the public. The survey asked staff members about their past experience with LEP individuals including how frequently they interacted with LEP persons, what languages the LEP individuals spoke, how successfully they communicated and what information LEP persons were seeking. Results of the staff survey are provided below. Staff members surveyed included: " 1-Clerk of the Board/Office and Board Services Manager " 1-Senior Administrative Assistant " 1-Senior Office Assistant/ Main Receptionist " 1-Administrative Assistant " 1-Community Relations Manager " 1-Staff Analyst, Commuter Assistance " 6 -Capital Projects Managers " 1-Outreach Consultant Most respondents noted interaction with Spanish speakers. One respondent reported interaction with an LEP individual speaking an Asian language. No other LEP languages were reported. Six respondents reported interacting with LEP individuals (Spanish) infrequently; one staff member reported interaction (Spanish) only once per month; and two staff members reported interaction with LEP individuals (Spanish) once per week. RCTC's main receptionist reported Spanish requests three times per week on average. Three staff members reported that they've never come into contact with LEP individuals during their time working for RCTC. Staff members have been able to communicate with LEP individuals through assistance from bilingual staff members, translators, and through hand gestures and drawings. The information LEP individuals seek varies, however, the most common requests are for RCTC project-specific construction information and how to pay fines for Metro Express lanes (not RCTC-related). In conclusion, Factor Two identified that RCTC does not frequently come into contact with LEP individuals, but of those that do access RCTC services and programs, most are likely to speak Spanish . 167 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Factor Three: The nature and importance of the program, activity, or service to people's lives RCTC is a state-mandated countywide agency tasked with the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County, which includes 28 cities, 7,208 square miles, and 2,189,641 individuals, according to the 2010 US Census The Commission's mission is to assume a leadership role in improving mobility in the County. The Commission is responsible for setting policies, establishing priorities, and coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and other agencies. The Commission also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal, state, and local funds for highway, transit, rail, non-motorized travel (bicycle and pedestrian), and other transportation activities. The Commission serves as the tax authority and implementation agency for the voter approved Measure A Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The Commission provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. The Commission is also legally responsible for allocating Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds, the major source of funds for transit in the County. Finally, the Commission has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the County. As the CMA, the Commission coordinates with local jurisdictions in the establishment of congestion mitigation procedures for the County's roadway system. RCTC's investments are being made to ensure and improve the quality of life of Riverside County's residents. Transportation interacts with a variety of human needs including a safe environment that includes better air quality, a reduction in water runoff, reducing the levels of greenhouse gases, and supporting transportation alternatives that promote better health through walking or bicycling. By taking a more holistic approach, the importance of transportation actually grows larger and is valued as a vital necessity. Factor Four: The resources available to the recipient for LEP outreach RCTC has numerous resources available to ensure it provides meaningful access to LEP individuals. These include existing community partners and utilization of its own resources. These resources are detailed below: • RCTC contracts with Language Line Solutions to provide simultaneous translation for LEP individuals. • Bilingual employees provide written and oral translations. • "I Speak" language identification cards are used at the front desk and at public meetings. • Language assistance information is provided on agendas and meeting notices. • Public notices are translated into LEP languages and distributed by various newspapers. • RCTC may utilize a public outreach firm that can provide language assistance as needed. • Riverside Transportation Network: This database ensures agencies and organizations that work • • with LEP individuals are provided the Commissions information and notices to distribute to their • clients. 168 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT " CAC/SSTAC-Many members of the CAC/SSTAC represent underrepresented and minority groups and are a useful resource for outreach to LEP individuals. " Riverside County Transit Operators: RCTC may partner with transit operators to post vital information on buses and at transfer locations. " SCAG's LEP Plan, Public Participation Plan, and existing translated resources can provide materials for LEP outreach and communication " RCTC translates Title VI vital documents and project-specific vital information into Spanish. " RCTC's website provides outreach and is equipped with a Google translator. " RCTC's Twitter is a useful outreach resource for some segments of the population. Discussion of Results Census data analyzed in Factor One was consistent with the experience of RCTC staff members analyzed in Factor Two to determine that Spanish-speaking LEP individuals are the largest and most frequent LEP group that accesses RCTC's services and programs. As these individuals comprise 13% of Riverside County's population, it will be important for the Commission to continue providing vital documents in Spanish. Additional LEP groups are very small populations (less than 1% of the population}, not yet identified (Other lndic Languages, for example}, and do not frequently access the Commissions services or programs, documents will be translated as requested or as is appropriate for a specific project. Details of language assistance services are provided in the following Implementation Plan . 169 " " " ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Ill. Implementation Plan Language Service Provision RCTC will provide the following language assistance measures to ensure LEP individuals have full access to the Commissions services, programs, and activities: Callers and Visitors " Front desk staff have "I Speak" language identification cards available to assist LEP individuals. " Several employees are bilingual and can help callers or visitors that speak Spanish RCTC contracts with Language Line Solutions, a language service provider, to provide simultaneous translation as needed. Language Line can be accessed by any staff member for translation services by calling 888-808-9008. The staff member can then put an LEP individual in touch with a translator for correspondence. Translation of Vital Documents FTA C 4702.lB defines vital documents as, "documents that provide access to essential services." The Commission will use this definition when assessing what documents should be translated . Title VI Documents are vital documents. The Title VI notice to the public, complaint form, and procedures are available in English and Spanish, the LEP language the RCTC is most likely to encounter. Vital documents are available on RCTC's website and at the front desk. Information about the availability of free language assistance is available on posted notices and agendas in Spanish. Spanish-Language Translation: RCTC already provides project notices and announcements and vital documents in Spanish and will continue to do so, as the Spanish-speaking LEP population represents a significant portion of Riverside County's populations. Documents that will be translated include: notices and announcements about public meetings and forums and pubic participation opportunities, key information distributed at project meetings, and any vital project-specific meetings. Other LEP Language Translations: The additional LEP languages represent very small communities and vital information will be translated as requested and as appropriate, with decisions made on a project-by-project basis. For example, if a project takes place in a community with a large LEP population, key information for that project will be translated into that LEP language. Oral interpretation: Oral interpretation will be provided at public meetings as requested and appropriate. Decisions will be made on a project-by-project basis. Notices of public meetings and forums include information about how to request oral interpretation . 170 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT Outreach/Notice of Availability of Language Assistance RCTC's Title VI Notice to the Public publicizes its language assistance services. Additionally, other notices may include the statement, "If information is needed in another language, please contact (951) 787-7141 for free translation services." Staff Training Outreach and front desk staff are trained in assisting LEP individuals, including identifying language and using the language service provider interpretation system. Training is provided for new employees and reoccurs as necessary. LEP training includes: • A summary of RCTC's language assistance requirements DOT LEP Guidance; • A summary of the Commission's language assistance plan; including responding to LEP persons • Results of RCTC's Four Factor Analysis, including a summary of the LEP individuals in Riverside County and the frequency of contact between the LEP population and the Commission' • A description of the Commission's non-discrimination policies and practices. 171 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT IV. Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the LAP A thorough review of the LAP will be undertaken every three years, or as necessary as guidelines are revised or as compliance reviews warrant. At that time, the LEP population will be reassessed to ensure all significant LEP languages are included in RCTC's language assistance efforts. The following reoccurring reporting and evaluation measures will be used to update the Language Assistance Plan: 1. RCTC will regularly assess the effectiveness of how the Commission communicates with LEP individuals by working with community stakeholders, such as the CAC/SSTAC, the Riverside Transit Network, County transit operators, non-profit agencies, among others. 2. Commission staff will track its language assistance efforts, including: " Tracking front desk staff interaction with LEP persons " Internal surveys of staff who are likely to engage with the public " Number of downloaded documents in other languages " Reports and updates from the language service provider " Requests for translation and interpretation 172 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT V. Contact information RCTC will post the LAP on its website at www.rctc.org. The LAP may be translated in any language for free upon request. Any questions or comments regarding the LAP should be directed to: Riverside County Transportation Commission John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. 0. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Phone: (951) 787-7141 Email: standifo@rctc.org 173 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT APPENDIX D: PERRIS VALLEY LINE, FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, SECTION 3.11: ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS 174 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION PERRIS VALLEY LINE RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Federal Transit Administration and Riverside County Transportation Commission Prepared by: KLEINFELDER ~ and Kleinfelder STV Incorporated 5015 Shoreham Place San Diego, California 92122 (858) 320-2000 9130 Anaheim Place, Suite 210 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (909) 484-0660 92666/SDl9R076 December 1, 2010 Revised: February, 2012 176 February 2012 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The proposed Perris Valley Line project is located in western Riverside County, extending approximately 24 miles between the cities of Riverside and Perris. The proposed project would extend commuter rail service into the Interstate 215 corridor. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and Section 4(f) Evaluation Submitted Pursuant to: Federal 42 USC 4332(2) C and 49 USC 303 92666/SDl9R076 Federal Transit Administration Region 9 and Riverside County Transportation Commission 178 February 2012 92666/SDl9R076 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This Page Intentionally Left Blank 179 • • • February 2012 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................." .......................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................" ................................. ES-1 1.0 PROPOSED PROJECT .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................ 1-2 1.3 PROJECT AREA AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 1-2 1.4 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................. 1-9 1.5 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................... 1-10 1.6 REGIONAL AND LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT ........................................... 1-11 1.7 PROJECT DETAILS ....................................................................................... 1-15 1.7.1 Track lmprovements .......................................................................... 1-19 1.7.2 Stations and Layover Facility ............................................................. 1-20 1.7.3 Culvert Replacement and Extension .................................................. 1-51 1.7.4 Bridge Replacements ......................................................................... 1-51 1.7.5 Grade Crossings ................................................................................ 1-51 1.7.6 Communication Systems ................................................................... 1-52 1. 7. 7 Noise Barriers .................................................................................... 1-53 1.7.8 Landscape Walls ............................................................................... 1-53 1. 7. 9 Construction ....................................................................................... 1-65 1 . 7 .1 O Operations ......................................................................................... 1-66 1. 7 .11 Maintenance ...................................................................................... 1-67 1. 7 .12 Freight Usage .................................................................................... 1-67 1.8 ACQUISITIONS AND RELOCATIONS ........................................................... 1-68 1.9 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS ........................................................................ 1-81 2.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 FTA Responsibilities ........................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 RCTC Responsibilities ........................................................................ 2-1 2.2 DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................... 2-2 2.2.1 No Project Alternative ........................................................................ 2-11 2.2.2 Express Bus Alternative ..................................................................... 2-11 2.2.3 New Commuter Rail Alternatives ....................................................... 2-12 2.3 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................................. 2-14 2.4 SELECTION OF THE LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ..................... 2-21 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION .............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 LAND USE AND ZONING .............................................................................. 3.1-1 3.1.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.1-1 3.1.2 Affected Environment... ..................................................................... 3.1-5 3.1.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ............................................. 3.1-8 3.1.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.1-11 3.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................... 3.2-1 92666/SDl9R076 3.2.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.2-1 3.2.2 Affected Environment. ....................................................................... 3.2-3 3.2.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ............................................. 3.2-4 Page i of xiv 180 February 2012 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3.2.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.2-11 3.3 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................ 3.3-1 3.3.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.3-1 3.3.2 Affected Environment... ................................................................... 3.3-10 3.3.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.3-16 3.3.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.3-37 3.4 NOISE AND VIBRATION ............................................................................... 3.4-1 3.4.1 Noise Regulatory Setting .................................................................. 3.4-5 3.4.2 Noise Affected Environment... ......................................................... 3.4-13 3.4.3 Noise Environmental Consequences/Impacts ................................. 3.4-24 3.4.4 Noise Mitigation Measures .............................................................. 3.4-33 3.4.5 Vibration Regulatory Setting ........................................................... 3.4-39 3.4.6 Vibration Affected Environment. ...................................................... 3.4-44 3.4. 7 Vibration Environmental Consequences/Impacts ............................ 3.4-47 3.4.8 Vibration Mitigation Measures ......................................................... 3.4-50 3.5 TRAFFIC AND PARKING .............................................................................. 3.5-1 3.5.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.5-1 3.5.2 Affected Environment. ....................................................................... 3.5-2 3.5.3 Environmental Consequences/lmpacts ........................................... 3.5-21 3.5.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.5-38 3.6 AESTHETICS ................................................................................................ 3.6-1 3.6.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.6-1 3.6.2 Affected Environment. ....................................................................... 3.6-2 3.6.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ............................................. 3.6-9 3.6.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.6-18 3. 7 CULTURAL RESOURCES AND SECTION 106 COMPLIANCE .................... 3. 7-1 3.7.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.7-1 3.7.2 Affected Environment. ....................................................................... 3.7-2 3.7.3 Environmental Consequences/lmpacts ............................................. 3.7-6 3.7.4 Mitigation Measures .......................................................................... 3.7-9 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................. 3.8-1 3.8.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.8-1 3.8.2 Affected Environment. ....................................................................... 3.8-2 3.8.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ............................................. 3.8-9 3.8.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.8-16 3.9 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ........................................................... 3.9-1 3.9.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................ 3.9-1 3.9.2 Affected Environment. ....................................................................... 3.9-4 3.9.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ............................................. 3.9-6 3.9.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.9-13 3.10 SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION AND PARKLANDS ....................................... 3.10-1 3.10.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.10-1 3.10.2 Affected Environment. ..................................................................... 3.10-3 3.10.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.10-8 3.10.4 Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 3.10-14 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS ............................ 3.11-1 92666/SD19R076 Page ii of xiv 181 February 2012 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3.11.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.11-1 3.11.2 Affected Environment.. .................................................................... 3.11-2 3.11.3 Environmental Consequences/lmpacts ......................................... 3.11-10 3.11.4 Summary ...................................................................................... 3.11-11 3.11.5 Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 3.11-12 3.12 SAFETY AND SECURITY ........................................................................... 3.12-1 3.12.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.12-1 3.12.2 Affected Environment.. .................................................................... 3.12-2 3.12.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.12-4 3.12.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.12-8 3.13 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE ............................. 3.13-1 3.13.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.13-1 3.13.2 Affected Environment... ................................................................... 3.13-7 3.13.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.13-8 3.13.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.13-8 3.14 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........................................................................ 3.14-1 3.14.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.14-1 3.14.2 Affected Environment... ................................................................... 3.14-4 3.14.3 Environmental Consequences/lmpacts ......................................... 3.14-24 3.14.4 Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 3.14-34 3.15 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................... 3.15-1 3.15.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.15-1 3.15.2 Affected Environment. ..................................................................... 3.15-7 3.15.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ......................................... 3.15-20 3.15.4 Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 3.15-21 3.16 WATER QUALITY ....................................................................................... 3.16-1 3.16.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.16-1 3.16.2 Affected Environment... ................................................................... 3.16-5 3.16.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.16-5 3.16.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.16-6 3.17 FLOODPLAINS ............................................................................................ 3.17-1 3.17.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.17-1 3.17 .2 Affected Environment. ..................................................................... 3.17-3 3.17 .3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.17-6 3.17.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.17-7 3.18 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................................... 3.18-1 3.18.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.18-1 3.18.2 Affected Environment. ..................................................................... 3.18-2 3.18.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.18-3 3.18.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 3.18-5 3.19 INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS .................................................. 3.19-1 3.19.1 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................... 3.19-1 3.19.2 Affected Environment. ..................................................................... 3.19-3 3.19.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts ........................................... 3.19-5 3.19.4 Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 3.19-10 4.0 AGENCY COORDINATION ........................................................................................ 4-1 92666/SDl9R076 Page iii of xiv 182 February 2012 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 4.1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ..................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 STATE AGENCIES .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 REGIONAL/LOCAL AGENCIES ...................................................................... 4-1 4.4 OTHER ............................................................................................................ 4-1 5.0 PUBLIC OUTREACH .................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 AGENCY COORDINATION ............................................................................. 5-1 5.2 PUBLIC SCOPING .......................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS ...................................................................... 5-1 5.3.1 Initial NEPA Process ........................................................................... 5-2 5.3.2 CEQA Process .................................................................................... 5-2 5.3.3 Current NEPA Process ....................................................................... 5-3 6.0 REPORT PREPARATION ........................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 LEAD AGENCY ............................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 REPORT PREPARERS ................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 7-1 8.0 INDEX ......................................................................................................................... 8-1 92666/SDl9R076 Page iv of xiv 183 February 2012 • • • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS This section addresses issues of environmental justice in minority and low-income populations and evaluates the proposed PVL with respect to the 1994 Presidential Executive Order 12898. 3.11.1 Regulatory Setting Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, directs tl=lat--ffederal agencies to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects that their programs, policies, and activities may have on minority and low income populations. Following the direction of EO 12898. Federal agencies developed their own guidelines to implement Environmental Justice CEJ). USDOT Order 5610.2 defines the fundamental principles of EJ as follows:do not deny or exclude populations from benefits and that no discrimination occurs under such programs, policies, or activities because of a population's race or income status. The fundamental principles underlying Environmental Justice assessments are to: " Avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority and low-income populations; " Ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process; and " Prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations. USDOT Order 5610.2 requires the following: " Consideration of mitigation and enhancement measures to benefit the affected minority and/or low-income population and all off-setting benefits to the affected populations. as well as design, comparative impacts. and the relevant number of similar existing system elements in non-minority and non-low-income areas; " Evaluation of whether alternatives or mitigation measures are practical; and " Documentation of the findings, determination. and/or demonstration made in accordance to the Order in the environmental document prepared for the program. policy, or activity. This analysis was developed in accordance with the USDOT Order to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (US DOT Order 5610.2), and the Council on Environmental Quality CCEQ) Environmental Justice -Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act. Race and income are socioeconomic characteristics critical to the consideration of a project's impacts on minority and low income populations. referred to as "EJ populations." CEQ guidance defines a 'minority person' as any individual who is a member of any of the following 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-1 184 February 2012 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS populations groups: American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, Pacific Islander, Black, or Hispanic. Low-income is defined as a person whose household income is at or below the U.S. Census Bureau's annual statistical poverty threshold, on which are based the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. The methodology for analyzing the effects of the proposed project on EJ populations (any identifiable population group meeting the requirements for minority or low-income) consists of the following steps: • Define the Project area boundary and identify census block groups in the study area; • Determine thresholds for minority and low-income populations to identify potential locations of EJ populations based on thresholds and additional information; • Analyze the location and severity of impacts associated with the project alternatives; and, • Determine disproportionately high adverse impacts (if any}. • The communities of particular concern to the assessment of Environmental Justice (EJ) are those identified as minority or low income communities. These "EJ Communities" are defined in accordance 'Nith Execuhve Order 12898 as identifiable groups of people, typically living in • geographic proximity; the lo•N income and minority populations are defined as follo•1JS: bow income population: A population having an annual income that is less than the po•«erty threshold. Poi.1erty thresholds are established by the U.S. Census Bureau, based on the income relative to household size and ages of members. Minority population: A population that is identified or recognized by the U.S. Census Bureau as African American or Black, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, or other (non i.•.•hite) Face,. 3. 11. 2 Affected Environment A disproportionately high and adverse effect on minority and low-income populations is defined as an effect that is predominately borne by, or would be suffered by an EJ population or that is appreciably more severe or greater in magnitude than adverse effects suffered by a non-EJ population. In general, the determination of disproportionately affected EJ populations is done by analyzing the pattern of overall environmental and human health impacts in relation to identified areas of EJ populations. Adverse effects are the totality of significant individual or cumulative human health or environmental effects. 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-2 185 February 2012 • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS Ultimately, EJ population impact determinations are made based on effects. not population size.1 However, in order to ensure thorough EJ consideration throughout the review process. it is important to determine where identifiable EJ communities may be present within a geographic area potentially affected by the proposed project. Therefore. the project study area is delineated to provide full disclosure of information pertaining to all potentially affected populations. including EJ Communities ... surrounding the SJBL alignment. The study area represents the physical range within which environmental effects of the PVL may be experienced by the resident population, whether adverse or beneficial. This study area determination is done early in the environmental review process so that public involvement with and participation by EJ communities can be established and maximized. The study area comprises 28 whole census tracts adjacent to the San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL) including Riverside County and the cities of Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris. The selected tracts intersect or are contiguous with the corridor.alignment and the proposed stations and Layover Facility. Additionally, theThe study area includes each tract having at least 50 percent of its area located within one mile of the alignment. (Note that Tract 427.06 is also included because it is entirely surrounded by other tracts that meet the aforementioned criteria). See Figure 3.11-1. As noted in the land use analysis (see Section 3.1 Land Use and Zoning), development is not evenly or homogenously distributed along the alignment, which runs through a mix of urban, semi-urban and rural residential areas, industrial parks, and agricultural areas. Likewise, population is not evenly dispersed throughout the region or, itself, homogenous or evenly mixed. Therefore, as delineated, this study area represents the various communities present along the corridor; it includes locations that could experience potentially adverse environmental effects, as well as portions of larger communities that would benefit from the PVL. Data describing population characteristics, including data describing demographic and income characteristics, are available from the 2000 U.S. Census at the Block Group level. A Block Group (BG) is a unit smaller than a tract, and it is the smallest geographic area for which the Census Bureau tabulates EJ populationminority and income data, thereby lending itself to determining the geographic distribution of EJ population groups as precisely as possible. Because tihese data are only available for the study area as products of the decennial Census.:. the 2000 Census data are the most current and are, therefore, used in this analysis. There are two versions of the Federal poverty measure: "poverty thresholds" prepared by the U.S. Census. and "poverty guidelines" prepared by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) which is based on the U.S. Census poverty thresholds. The HHS poverty guidelines provide weighted averages of income that vary according to family size, and are intended to serve administrative purposes, such as the determination of financial eligibility for certain federal programs. For example, HHS poverty guidelines indicate that a four-person 1 FHWA Environmental Justice web site, "The Facts -Nondiscrimination: Title VI and Environmental Justice," http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environmental/ejustice/facts/index.htm. retrieved February 13. 2012 . 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-3 186 February 2012 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS family in 2012 earning $23,050 or less would qualify for certain poverty-based programs. The U.S. Census poverty thresholds, in contrast, serve statistical purposes; all official poverty population figures are calculated using U.S. Census poverty thresholds, not HHS poverty guidelines.2 Therefore, all data describing population characteristics, including data describing demographic and income characteristics, are available from the 2000 U.S. Census at the Block Group level {current at the time of the analyses and public outreach activities). In all, -79-ZQ._BGs represent the population of the study area. Portions of the cities of Riverside (~2 BGs), Moreno Valley (five BGs), and Perris (20 BGs) are included in the study area; these three cities would be served by the PVL. In addition, nine BGs of unincorporated Riverside County, which are proximate to the rail corridor, are also included in the study area. • As noted previously, the initial stages of an EJ evaluation focus on public outreach, and in particular. identifying "populations" that qualify as EJ populations. To this end. the geographic and statistical unit of measurement for a population is identified. which is the BG, as described above. The next step is to determine what proportion or percentage of any BG population in the project's area should be identified as minority or low income in order to qualify that BG as an EJ population. These proportions or percentages are known as "thresholds." Federal guidance on the determination of EJ thresholds is not prescriptive and allows for flexibility. A conservative and inclusive approach is generally applied. thus ensuring that all potentially qualifying EJ • communities may be actively engaged during early stages of the .. pubJic involvement process. well before impacts may be identified as. a result of technical analyses. The thresholds for a low-income or minority community comprising an "identifiable" EJ population with regard to this project have been defined as followsmay be defined such that any BG meeting or exceeding the following thresholds for a low income or minority community, would be considered an EJ Community for that variable: Low-income community: BGs considered to be low-income communities for the PVL project are those BGs for which the percentage of population living below poverty is equivalent to or greater than the percentage of population living below the poverty level for Riverside County as a whole. (The county is used as the benchmark or "reference" community, per FT A guidance.) The percentage of Riverside County population living below the poverty level was 14.17 percent. according to the 2000 U.S. Census; this percentage is calculated as the number of persons identified living in poverty (214,084 persons), per the total population "for whom poverty status was considered" (1.511.153 persons). (Please refer to Appendix C.) Therefore, BGs within the study area having 14.17 percent or more of their population living below poverty level according to the 2000 U.S. Census are considered low-income communities for this 2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. "2012 HHS Poverty Guidelines: One Version of the [U.S.] Federal accessed February 17. 2012. Poverty Measure." Available at HHS web site: http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/12poverty.shtml#quidelines. • 92666/SD19R076 3.11-4 187 February 2012 " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS assessment.A census block group or contiguous area with multiple census block groups, having a low income population equal to or greater 23.59 percent of the total population. Minority community: BGs considered to be minority communities for the PVL project are those BGs for which the percentage of population that is minority is equivalent to or greater than the percentage of county population that is minority. (The county is used as the benchmark or "reference" community. per FTA guidance.) The percentage of Riverside County population that is minority according to 2000 U.S. Census data. was 49.05 percent: this percentage is calculated as the number of persons (758.069 persons) identified as minority (Black or African American. American Indian and Alaskan Native. Asian. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander. Hispanic or Latino) by the U.S. Census in 2000. per the total population of the county in 2000 (1 .545.387 persons). (Please refer to Appendix C.) Therefore, BGs within the study area having minority persons represent 49.05 percent or more of the total BG population are considered minority communities for this assessment.A census block group or contiguous area 'Nith multiple census block groups, having a minority population equal to or greater 51.1 percent. Using these definitions. the majority of BGs in the study area qualify as EJ communities. Of the 76 BGs comprising the study area. eight BGs qualify as EJ Communities according to minority status alone. two qualify according to poverty status alone. and 55 of the 76 BGs qualify according to both low-income and minority status (using the 49.05 percent threshold). A total of 94,462 minority persons reside in the study area (approximately 67.3 percent of the total study area population). and there are 18,076 low-income households in the study area (approximately 41.9 percent of all households within the study area). The following data comparisons help illustrate the project context: " o Approximately 49.05 percent of county population is minority, and all three cities (Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris) have minority percentages greater than that of the county: o Approximately 66.0 percent of the study area population in the city of Riverside is minority population. compared to 54.5 percent for the city as a whole; o Approximately 69.0 percent of the study area population in the city of Moreno Valley is minority population, compared to 67.6 percent for the city as a whole; and o Approximately 71.2 percent of the study area population in the city of Perris is minority population. compared to 78.4 percent for the city as a whole. All three cities also have a larger percentage of low-income population than the county . Considering demographic profiles of those BGs included in the study area. low-income populations of the three cities are for the most part well represented in the study area: o Approximately 27.3 percent of study area households in the Riverside City BGs are low-income. compared to 15.8 percent for the city as a whole; 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-5 188 February 2012 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENT AL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS o Approximately 21.2 percent of study area households in the Moreno Valley BGs are low-income. compared to 14.2 percent for the city as a whole; and o Approximately 21.3 percent of study area households in the Perris BGs are low- income. compared to 20.4 percent for the city as a whole. though 17 of the 20 Perris BGs included in the study area qualify as EJ Communities. As the majority of the study area comprises BGs qualifying as EJ Communities. the public outreach and community involvement meetings have been located in these communities throughout the AA. EA. and SEA processes. The public involvement program has been designed and executed to reach the affected population. the majority of whom qualify as EJ population. Meetings and hearings were held throughout the study area. within identified EJ communities and at locations accessible to all members of the public. Community meetings were held to engage the community in the AA process during the development of project alternatives. and to elicit comment from the public. The six public scoping meetings conducted throughout 2002 and 2003. were held in Moreno Valley, Riverside and Perris. at public venues accessible to minority and/or low-income members of the community. Public hearings and informational meetings were held in public venues. likewise accessible to minority and/or low- income members of the study area. Public meetings included means to ensure access for non- English speakers. with interpreters available and bilingual reading materials provided. In • addition to locating its public outreach meetings and hearings within identified. EJ Communities. • RCTC has reached out to the public via public meetings with bilingual project materials, newsletters. published notices. and a website dedicated to PVL. For more information regarding Public Outreach. see Chapter 5.0. ,t\pproximately 49.1 percent of Riverside County's population in 2000 was minority and about 14 .2 percent of Riverside County's households were lo•N income. The study area represents a concentration of EJ population compared to the county as a whole, which has lo•Ner percentages of minority population and low income households overall (see Figure 3.11 1 and Appendix C). Of the 76 BGs comprising the study area, 22 BGs qualify as EJ Communities according to minority status alone, two qualify according to poverty status alone, and 39 of the 76 BGs qualify according to both minority and low income status. /\ total of 85,853 minority persons reside in the study area (approximately 61.2 percent of the total study area population), and there are 7,026 low income households in the study area (approximately 16.3 percent of all households 1Nithin the study area). 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-6 189 February 2012 • " " " LEGEND -PVLALIGNMENT 0 CONNECTING TRACK " EXISTING STATION PROPOSED STATION CENSUS TRACTS COMPRISING STUDY AREA BLOCK GROUP WITH SIGNIFICANT MINORITY POPULATION BLOCK GROUP WITH SIGNIFICANT POPULATION BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL D 1-MILE RADIUS 2 0 N A 2 Miles PROJECT NO. 92666 DRAWN: 2/17/12 -;7 ' Southern California Association of Governments, 2001: , 1999 Census of Population and Housing, U.S. Census Bureau, ,. 2000 Census STF3 STV Incorporated 7-30-09 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES FIGURE DRAWN BY: JP 3 11 1 ~C-H_E_C_K_E_D_B_Y_:--R-M---+-S-U-P-PL_E_M_E_N_T_A_L_E-NV_l_R_O_N_M_E-NT_A_L_A_S_S_E-SS_M_E_N_T---t " - 1-----------' RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FILE NAME: PERRIS VALLEY LINE 92666EJ.MXD RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA " " " 0 "' o1 O! O; ;: LEGEND -PVLALIGNMENT � CONNECTING TRACK " EXISTING STATION " PROPOSED STATION D I I 2.5 CENSUS TRACTS COMPRI STUDY AREA BLOCK GROUP ITH 23.59% OR MORE OF POP LATION BELOW THE POVER LEVEL 92666 Southern California Association � j 1999 Census of Population and �� 2000 Census STF3 ���( !,j STV Incorporated 7-30-09 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES RM SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1-------------1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FILE NAME: 92666EJ.MXD PERRIS VALLEY LINE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA " " " A TI ACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS " Approximately 49.1 percent of county population is minority, and all three cities (Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris) have minority peroentages greater than that of the county. Considering demographic profiles of those BGs included in the study area, minority populations of the three cities are respectively represented in the study area; " /\pproximately 66.0 percent of the study area population in the city of Rii.ferside is minority population, compared to 54 .5 peroent for city as \\'hole; " Approximately 69.0 percent of the study area population in the city of Moreno Valley is minority population, compared to 67.6 percent for city as 1Nhole; and " Approximately 71.2 percent of the study area population in the city of Perris is minority population, compared to 78.4 percent for city as whole. l\11 throe cities have a larger percentage of low income population than the county. Considering demographic profiles of those BGs included in the study area, low income populations of the throe cities are for the most part 'Nell represented in tho study area: " Approximately 23 poroont of study area households in tho Riverside City BGs are lo" N income, compared to 15.8 percent for city as whole; and " Approximately 17 percent of study area households in Moreno Valley BGs are low income, compared to 14 .2 percent for city as whole. " Approximately ten percent of study area households in the Perris BGs are lo" n income, compared to 20.4 percent for tho city as a whole, though 17 of the 20 Perris BGs included in the study area qualify as EJ Communities. /\s the majority of the study area comprises BGs qualifying as EJ Communities, the public outreach and community involv:ement meetings have been located in these communities throughout the AA, EA, and SEA processes. The public involvement program has been undertaken to reach the affected population, the majority of 1Nhom qualify as EJ population. Community meetings have been held to engage the community in the AA process to de" �elop tho LP/\ (the PVL), and to elicit comment from the public. RCTC has reached out to the public via public meetings with bilingual project materials, newsletters, published notices, and a website dedicated to PVL. for more information regarding Public Outreach see Chapter 5.0. Based on community input received as part of the EA process, critical and sensitive components of the communities and neighborhood environs were identified throughout the corridor to ensure potential effects would be appropriately assessed. Field survey data collected for the analyses of land use, traffic, air quality, noise, etc., also informed the EJ assessment. Data were collected in the field to identify sensitive receptors for air and noise monitoring, for which three separate noise data collection programs were conducted in 2002, 2005, and 2008/2009. As described in Section 2.0 Project Alternatives, the former UP RIL LPA was replaced by the current LPA in order, in part, to avoid potential impacts to an EJ Community in Riverside . 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-9 194 February 2012 ATIACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS 3.11.3 Environmental Consequences/Impacts For the purposes of EJ assessment, the potential environmental consequences of the PVL are considered in order to determine whether there would be disproportionately high and adverse effects on EJ Communities; specifically, whether there would be an adverse effect predominantly borne by or suffered by an EJ Community in a more severe fashion or greater magnitude than the adverse effect would be suffered by the non-EJ population. Preliminary engineering has informed the SEA process sufficiently to determine that there would be no disproportionately high or adverse effects on EJ Communities, as all impacts would be avoided or mitigated. Certain impacts, which have been predicted in SEA analyses would be fully mitigated through such measures as the erection of noise barriers to protect sensitive receptors from unwanted noise created by the PVL; and the expected provision of signals and the adjustment of signal timing, or lane re-striping, to address predicted traffic impacts. Significant adverse air quality impacts would not occur, and there would be a net benefit to regional air quality through the reduction of greenhouse gases. • Positive environmental consequences, that is, those project-induced effects benefiting an EJ Community are also considered in an EJ analysis. RCTC would install new crossing controls to improve safety, and new traffic signals that would be necessary even without the PVL to improve traffic flow and reduce idle time. Further. +As-the most significant positive impact from the PVL would be the provision of access to a new mode of transportation. Although some land • acquisitions are anticipated to be necessary for station construction. as described in Chapter 1.0 (please refer to Section 1.8. Acquisitions and Relocations), no acquisition associated with PVL would require displacement of any population. including qualifying EJ population .. RCTC v1ould install new crossing controls to improve safety, and ne•N traffic signals that \¥-Ould be necessary even without the PVL to impro•.ie traffic flow and reduce idle time. It is the intent of the project to provide improved public transportation services to the region. With each of the four stations located direct~ within an EJ Community and proximate to others, tlhe PVL would be accessible to the EJ Communities and jurisdictions it is intended to serve, including the cities of Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris. The PVL would therefore be of potential indirect socioeconomic value to the EJ Communities it serves, providing improved access and mobility within the region. Not only would the EJ Communities comprising and represented by the study area not be burdened by adverse effects, these communities would benefit from improved access to jobs, housing, schools, and other community services available within the Riverside County and region as a whole. The PVL would accommodate a portion of existing transportation demand in Riverside County but would not directly induce population growth or significantly alter demographic trends; therefore, the PVL would not directly or indirectly lead to changes in demographic conditions, including the makeup of EJ Communities in the study area. By providing commuter rail service to the study area and the region generally, the PVL would satisfy community plans and policies that anticipate support the PVL (see Section 3.1 Land Use and Zoning). Communities that would be served by the PVL have indicated their support for the project through inclusion of the PVL in their county and city land use plans and discussion of the project's consistency with county, city and specific plan policies. 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-10 195 February 2012 • " " " ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS No direct economic losses or significant adverse effects would result from the project, as it would not require acquisition, relocation or construction of residences or businesses. The PVL itself would not generate significant numbers of new jobs, though the operation of the PVL may entail some increase in personnel or reallocation of human resources by SCRRA/Metrolink to maintain the trains, stations and Layover Facility. Through the provision of a new transportation service, in conformity with county, city, and specific area plans, the PVL may enable new economic development planning in the region following the start-up of service. Construction Impacts As described throughout this SEA, effects related to construction activities would be temporary and limited. For any ground-disturbing activities along the SJBL ROW, station sites, and Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs), RCTC would establish Best Management Practices (BMPs} to control fugitive dust, erosion and sedimentation related to construction, and provide for appropriate restoration after construction. The BMPs would be incorporated into construction documents. Therefore, no significant adverse effects to EJ Communities would result. Construction activities, during a period of approximately 18 months, would generate a stimulus for the local economy due to construction-period expenditures for equipment, materials, supplies, and employment of workers by contractors. Indirect economic benefits would also occur due to the multiplier effect as construction-generated revenues would be re-spent by suppliers and workers. 3. 11.4 Summary It should be noted that the EJ analyses prepared for this SEA. beginning with the outreach efforts conducted prior to the SEA. relied on 2000 Census data. which were current and appropriate for designing public outreach efforts and completing the EJ assessment. These data allowed for the conservative identification of numerous EJ communities located throughout the study area. as described in this section and illustrated on Figure 3.11-1. The identification of these communities thus ensured that thorough and effective community outreach was undertaken at key locations in identified EJ communities throughout the study area throughout the planning and review process. Although 201 O Census data were released prior to the publication of this SEA document. these data were not available for outreach efforts; as such, the outreach was conducted using the most appropriate Census data (2000). Moreover. any changes to calculations of population percentages related to low income or minority characteristics using 2010 Census data versus 2000 Census data would not affect the EJ determinations reached herein. The determination of no disproportionate adverse effect to EJ population is supported by technical analyses that remain entirely unaffected by 2010 Census data. and these technical analyses have determined that no unmitigated significant adverse effect would be borne by any population. including EJ communities. Consequently, there is no purpose in reconsidering population characteristics in light of 201 O Census data availability. Moreover. any changes to calculations of population percentages related to low income or minority characteristics using 2010 Census data versus 2000 Census data would not affect the EJ determinations reached herein. The determination of no disproportionate adverse effect to EJ population is supported by technical analyses that remain entirely unaffected by 2010 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-11 196 February 2012 ATTACHMENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOECONOMICS Census data, and these technical analyses have determined that no unmitigated significant adverse effect would be borne by any population, including EJ communities. Consequently, there is no purpose in reconsidering population characteristics in light of 2010 Census data availability. In summary, the full and fair participation of all potentially affected communities was facilitated by the EJ assessment and public outreach processes. The PVL would result in no denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits to EJ communities. and the PVL would result in no disproportionately high or adverse human health or environmental effects being borne by EJ communities with the recommended noise and vibration and traffic mitigation measures in place (refer to Table ES.2-1 in the Executive Summary). Therefore. no further analysis is required for environmental justice and no additional mitigation would be required to satisfy Executive Order 12898. · J.4:1..:.43. 11. 5 Mitigation Measures With prescribed mitigation measures in place to address potential adverse effects related to noise. vibration and traffic, EJ communities would not be burdened with any significant adverse effects associated with the PVL. These mitigation measures include the: • • Construction of 13 noise barriers and provision of sound insulation at eight properties, • as detailed in Sections 3.4.4 Noise Mitigation Measures; • Use of ballast mats and resiliently supported ties (under-tie pads) in the UCR area of Riverside. as detailed in Section 3.4.8,Vibration Mitigation Measures; and • Changes to traffic signal timing, installation of a new traffic signal. and development of a traffic management plan. as detailed in Section 3.5A.,, Traffic and Parking Mitigation Measures., respectively, EJ Cemmunities •.veuld net be burdened with any significant adverse effects asseciated •1.1ith the PVL With these mitigation measures in place. no significant adverse effects would occur with the PVL. and therefore no EJ population would be disproportionately burdened with any adverse effect as a result of the PVL.Ne further analysis is required for envirenmental justice and no mitigatien would be required to satisfy Executive Order 12898. 92666/SDl9R076 3.11-12 197 February 2012 • " " " A TI AC HM ENT 1: TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT APPENDIX E: DOCUMENTATION OF GOVERNING BODY REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Meeting Minutes and Staff Report to be attached upon approval of the Commission and prior to submittal to FTA) 198 " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee FROM: Jillian Guizado, Staff Analyst Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Operation of the Freeway Service Patrol Program in Riverside County WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 15-45-027-00 with the California Department of Transportation {Caltrans) for the operation of the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol {FSP) program in the amount of $1,635,846 in state funding for FY 2014/15; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 1986, the Commission established itself as the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies {RC SAFE) after the enactment of SB 1199 in 1985. The purpose of the formation of SAFEs in California was to provide call box services and, with excess funds, provide additional motorist aid services. Funding for RC SAFE is derived from a one dollar per vehicle registration fee on vehicles registered in Riverside County. Initially, these funds were used only for the call box program. As additional motorist aid services were developed, SAFE funds were also used to provide FSP and the Inland Empire 511 traveler information services as part of a comprehensive motorist aid system in Riverside County. In 1990, Proposition C was passed to fund transportation improvements and to help reduce traffic congestion in California. From this, the FSP program was created by Caltrans, which developed the corresponding Local Funding Allocation Plan to distribute funds to participating jurisdictions through a formula based on population, urban freeway lane miles, and levels of congestion. The Commission, acting in its capacity as the RC SAFE, is the principal agency in Riverside County, in partnership with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol, managing the FSP program. The purpose of the FSP program is to provide a continuously roving tow services Agenda Item 8H patrol along designated freeway segments (referred to as beats) to relieve freeway congestion and facilitate the rapid removal of disabled vehicles and those involved in minor accidents on local freeways. Currently, the Commission contracts with four tow truck operators to provide service on a total of nine beats Monday through Friday during the peak commute hours, 5:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. (12:30 p.m. on Fridays) to 6:30 p.m. In FY 2013/14, FSP performed over 44,000 assists. DISCUSSION: In October 2014, the Commission received the attached funding agreement from Caltrans for FY 2014/15. Caltrans funding agreements are reimbursement-based and allow for the carryover of contract balances not expended in the agreement's stated fiscal year. This allows the Commission to fully expend allocated amounts and also helps to accommodate the timing of the Caltrans allocation release, which is typically later during the fiscal year for which it is intended. The table below summarizes the use of these funding agreements by fiscal year: Amount Expended Caltrans Funding Agreement No. FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 10-45-036-00 ($ 1,657,171) $192,643 $1,464,528 11-45-105-00 ($ 1,577,721) $303,402 $1,274,319 12-45-068-00 ($ 1,653,564) $536,958 $1,116,606 13-45-075-00 ($ 1,606,567) $621,880 $984,687 14-45-084-00 ($ 1,557,104) $782,185 $774,919 The Caltrans funding agreement for FY 2014/15 provides for continued state funding in the amount of $1,635,846. The Commission will fund the required local match of $408,962 with RC SAFE revenues. As with prior funding agreements, any state funds not claimed in the current fiscal year will be carried over and claimed in FY 2015/16. A budget adjustment is not required and upon approval of this agenda item, the Commission will execute this fund transfer agreement with Caltrans. Agenda Item 8H " Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: I Yes I I 2014/15 Amount: I $775,000 N/A Year: 2015/16+ $860,846 Source of Funds: I State of California Budget Adjustment: I No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 002173 415 41508 0000 20145 41505 Fiscal Procedures Approved: ~~ I Date: I 02/12/2015 Attachment: FSP Fund Transfer Agreement " " Agenda Item 8H 202 " STATE'. OF CALiFORNIA -CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION --��--� Division of Local Assistance 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 TIY711 (916) 654-3883 Fax (916) 654-2408 October 8, 2014 Ms. Anne Mayer Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission P 0 Box 12008 (4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor) Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Mr. Brian Cunanan Dear Ms. Mayer: EDMUND G. BROWN Jr., Governor File : 08-RIV-Var-RCTC FSP15-6054(068) 2014/2015 Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) Program Enclosed are two original agreements covering funding for the fiscal year 2014/2015 Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) Program. Office of Local Programs will again this year handle the processing of agreements. The enclosed agreement and its processing should also streamline the agreement and invoicing process. Please sign both copies of this Agreement and return them to this office, Office of Local Programs -MS1. Alterations should not be made to the agreement language. ATTACH YOUR LOCAL AGENCY'S CERTIFIED AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION THAT CLEARLY IDENTIFIES THE PROJECT AND THE OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. A fully executed copy of the agreement will be returned to you upon ratification by Caltrans. Your invoicing, in accordance with applicable Section II, Article 6, would then be submitted in accordance with Section II, Articles 7 and 8 of the Fund Transfer Agreement, not to this Office. Sincerely, ~~HN HOOLE, Chief 1? Office of Project Implementation -South l Division of Local Assistance " Enclosure c: Lisa Davies -HQ Traffic Operations OLP AE Project Files (08) DLAE -Sean Yeung 203 t• i f • FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM FUND TRANSFER AGREEMENT (Non Federal) Agreement No. FSP15-6054(068) Project No. FSP15-6054(068) Location: 08-RIV-Var-RCTC AMS Adv 10:0815000044 THIS AGREEMENT, effective on July 1, 2014, is between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as STATE, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission, a public agency, hereinafter referred to as "ADMINISTERING AGENCY." WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code (S&HC) Section 2560 et seq., authorizes STATE and administering agencies to develop and implement a Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program on traffic-congested urban freeways throughout the state; and WHEREAS, STATE has distributed available State Highway Account funds to administering agencies participating in the FSP Program in accordance with S&HC Section 2562; and WHEREAS, ADMINISTERING AGENCY has applied to STATE and has been selected to receive funds from the FSP Program for the purpose of Freeway Service Patrol for FY 2014-2015, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and WHEREAS, proposed PROJECT funding is as follows: Total Cost State Funds $2,044,808.00 $1,635,846.00 Local Funds $408,962.00 ; and WHEREAS, STATE is required to enter into an agreement with ADMINISTERING AGENCY to delineate the respective responsibilities of the parties relative to prosecution of said PROJECT; and WHEREAS, STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY mutually desire to cooperate and jointly participate in the FSP program and desire to specify herein the terms and conditions under which 1he FSP program is to be conducted; and WHEREAS, ADMINISTERING AGENCY has approved entering into this Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on , a copy of which is attached. For Caltrans Use Only I hereby Certify upon my own personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance Accounting Officer I Date I$ tt!/et/7/l'f I, 63 5, i "-/{p Page 1 of 7 Non-Fed FSP 204 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SUPPLMENT AND CERTIFICATION FORM PSCF (REV. 0112010) TO: FROM: Claims Audits 3301 "C" Street, Rm 404 Sacramento, CA 95816 Department of Tr.msPQrtatlon SUBJEC: Encumbrance Document VENDOR 1 LOCAL AGENCY: Page 1 of 1 DATE PREPARED: PROJECT NUMBER: 9/29/2014 0815000044 REQUISmON NUMBER J CONTRACT NUMBER: RQS 081500000177 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROCUREMENTTYP : Local Assistance CHAPTEE~ STATUTES ITEM ; YEAR PEC/PECT TASK I SUBTASK AMOUNT • 25 2014 2660-102-890; 14-15 2030010300 2620/0420 $ 1.635,846~00 : . . . . ADA N tii For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information. call (915) 654-6410 of TDD {916) -3880 or Wlite O Records and Forms Management, 1120 N. Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 205 • " NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: " " SECTION I STATE AGREES: 1. To define or specify, in cooperation with ADMINISTERING AGENCY, the limits of the State Highway segments to be served by the FSP as well as the nature and amount of the FSP dedicated equipment, if any, that is to be funded under the FSP program. 2. To pay ADMINISTERING AGENCY the STATE's share, in amount not to exceed $1,635,846.00, of eligible participating PROJECT costs. 3. To deposit With ADMINISTERING AGENCY, upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY's award .of a contract for PROJECT services and receipt of an original and two signed copies of an invoice in the proper form, including identification of this Agreement Number and Project Number, from ADMINISTERING AGENCY, the amount of $261,735.36. This initial deposit represents STATE's share of the estimated costs for the initial two months of PROJECT. Thereafter, to make n~imbursements to ADMINISTERING AGENCY as promptly as state fiscal procedures will permit, but not more often than monthly in arrears, upon receipt of an original and two signed eopies of invoices in the proper form covering actual allowable costs incurred for the prior sequential month's period of the Progress Payment Invoice. The initial deposit will be calculated at 16% of the STA TE's total share . 4. When conducting an audit of the costs claimed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under the provisions of this Agreement, ST ATE will rely to the maximum extent possible on any prior audit of ADMINISTERING AGENCY performed pursuant to the provisions of state and federal laws. In the absence of such an audit, work of other auditors will be relied upon to the extent that work is acceptable to ST ATE when planning and conducting additional audits. SECTION II ADMINISTERING AGENCY AGREES: 1. To commit and contribute matching funds from ADMINISTERING AGENCY resources, which shall be an amount not less than 25 percent of the amount provided by STATE from the State Highway Account. 2. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY's detailed PROJECT Cpst Proposal is attached hereto and made an express part of this Agreement. The detailed PROJECT Cost Proposal reflects the provisions and/or regulations of Section Ill, Article 8, of this Agreement. 3. To use all state funds paid hereunder only for those transportation-related PROJECT purposes that conform to Article XIX of the California State Constitution . Page 2 of 7 Non-Fed FSP 206 4. STATE funds provided to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this Agreement shall not be used for administrative purposes by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Said administrative costs may be credited toward ADMINISTERING AGENCY's PROJECT matching funds provided claimed administrative costs are specified on ADMINISTERING AGENCY's invoice submittal. If said administrative costs are "indirect", as definied in 2 CFR, Part 225, Cost Principles for State and Local Government, the costs must be allocated in accordance with an Indirect Cost Allocation Plan (ICAP), reviewed and approved by STATE's Office of Audits and Investigation, for each applicable fiscal year. 5. To develop, in cooperation with STATE, advertise, award, and administer PROJECT contract(s) in accordance with ADMINISTERING AGENCY competitive procurement procedures, in compliance with 49 Code oJ Federal Regulations (CFR) P~rt 18.36. 6. Upon award of a contract for PROJECT, to prepare ancl submit to STATE an original and two signed copies of invoicing forSTATE's initial deposit specified in Section I, Article 3. Thereafter; to prepare and submit to STATE an original and two signed copies of progress invoicing for STATE's share of actual expenditures for allowable PROJECT costs. 7. Said invoicing shall evidence the expenditure of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's PROJECT participation in paying not less than 20% of all allowable PROJECT costs and shall contain the information described in Chapter 5 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Invoicing • shall demonstrate ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S PROJECT participation by showing a matched e~penditure of funds of at least 25% of the amount provided by the STATE. ADMINISTERING • AGENCY invoices shall be submitted to: State of California Department of Transportation Division of Traffice Operations, MS 36 Office of System Management Operations 1120 "N" Street Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 8. Within 60 days after completion of PROJECT work to be reimbursed under this Agreement, to prepare a final invoice reporting all actual eligible costs expended, including all costs paid by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and submit that signed invoice, along with any refund due STATE, to the address referenced above under Section II, Article 7. Backup information submitted with said final invoice shall include all FSP operational contract invoices paid by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to contracted operators included in expenditures billed to STA TE under this Agreement. 9. COST PRINCIPLES A) ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with, and require all project sponsors to comply with, 2 CFR, Part 225, Cost Principles for State and Local Government, and 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Page 3 of 7 Non-Fed FSP 207 • " " B) ADMINISTERING AGENCY will assure that its Fund recipients will be obligated to agree that (1.) Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items, and (2.) those parties shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Every sub-recipient receiving Funds as a contractor or sub-contractor under this Agreement shall comply with Federal administrative procedures .in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. C) Any Fund expenditures for costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 225, 48 CFR, Chapter 1,. Part 31 or 49 CFR, Part 18, are subject to repayment by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to STATE. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY fail to reimburse Fund moneys due STATE within 30 days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed in writing between the Parties hereto, STATE is authorized to intercept and Withhold future payments due ADMINISTERING AGENCY from STATE or any third-party source, including, but not limited to, the State Treasurer, the State Controller, and the California Transportation Commission. 10. THIRD PARTY CONTRACTING A) ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a construction contract over $10,000 or other contracts over $25,000 [excluding professional service contracts of the type which are required to be procured in accordance with Government Code Sections 4525 (d), (e), and (f)] on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed using Funds without the prior written approval of STATE. B) Any subcontract or agreement entered into by ADMINISTERrNG AGENCY as a result of disbursing Funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall contain all of the fiscal provisions (Section II, Paragraphs 9, 11, 12, & 13) of this Agreement; and shall mandate that travel and per diem reimbursements and third-party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as project costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors. C) In addition to the above, the preaward requirements of third party contractor/consultants with ADMINISTERING AGENCY should be consistent with Local Program Procedures as published by STATE. 11. ACCOUNTING SYSTEM ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate Fund expenditures by line item for the PROJECT. The accounting system of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors, and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices . Page 4 of 7 Non-Fed FSP 208 12. RIGHT TO AUDIT For the purpose of determinjng compliance with this Agreement and other matters connected with the performance of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's contracts with third parties, ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY's contractors, and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above referenced parties shall make such materials available at their .respective offices at all reasonable times for three yeara from the date of final payment of Funds to ADMINISTERING AGENCY. STATE, the California State Auctitor, or any duty authorized representative of STATE or the United States Department of Transportation shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent for audits, examinations~ excerpts, and transactions, and ADMINISTERING AGENCY ~h.all furnish copies thereof if requested. 13. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE • Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for travel and subsistence expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or applied as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid exempt non-represented State employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced are in excess of those authorized DPA rates, then ADMINISTERING AGENCY is responsible for the cost difference and any overpayments shall be reimbursed to STATE on • demand. 14. SINGLE AUDIT ADMINISTERING· AGENCY agrees to include all state (Funds) and federal funded projects in the schedule of projects to be examined in ADMINISTERING AGENCY's annual audit and in the schedule of projects to be examined under its single audit prepared in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Cireular A..;133. SECTION Ill IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement is available only upon the passage of the State Budget Act containing these STATE funds. The starting date of eligible reimbursable activities shall be JULY 1, 2014. 2. All obligations of ADMINISTERING AGENCY under the terms of this Agreement are subject tO authorization and allocation of resources by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Page 5 of 7 Non-Fed FSP 209 • " " " 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE shall jointly define the initial FSP program as well as the appropriate level of FSP funding recommendations and scope of service and equipment required to provide and manage the FSP program. No changes shall be made in these unless mutually agreed to in writing by the parties to this Agreement. 4. Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to this Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of State highways different from the standard of care imposed by law. 5. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of .anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that; pursuant to Government Code Section 895,4, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless the State of California, its officers, and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought for or on account ofinjury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this Agreement. 6. Neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage, or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its officers, and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. 7. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will maintain an inventory of all non-expendable PROJECT equipment, defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $500 or more, paid for with PROJECT funds. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall define in PROJECT contract who shall take ownership of all equipment at the conclusion of the Project. 8. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and its sub-contractors will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including but not limited to, 2 CFR, Part 225, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments, and 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. 9. In the event that ADMINISTERING AGENCY fails to operate the PROJECT commenced and reimbursed under this Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or fails to comply with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, STATE reserves the right to terminate funding for PROJECT, or portions thereof, upon written notice to ADMINISTERING AGENCY . Page 6 of 7 Non-Fed FSP 210 .. . . 10. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30, 2017. However, the non-expendable equipment and liability clauses shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement STATE OF CALIFORNIA Riverside County Transportation Commission Department of Transportation By: By: _________ _ Office of Project Implementation, South Title: ----------- Division of local Assistance Date; Date:---------- Page 7 of 7 Non-Fed FSP 211 • • • " " " 4.. 41. dmiji 1 • " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Policy Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2015/16 Budget BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Budget. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The initial step in the budget process is to develop policy goals and objectives for the next fiscal year that are consistent with the Commission's overall strategic direction. Most importantly, the adoption of the Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the annual fiscal year budget provides an opportunity to match the Commission's spending priorities in a manner that implements the promises made to the citizens of the county of Riverside in both Measure A Expenditure Plans and fulfills other Commission responsibilities. Planning for the future was a primary topic during the Commission's 2015 Workshop in January. With the help of a facilitator, the Commission discussed its vision related to the future of the county's transportation system. The discussion resulted in the draft of principles to guide and direct staff in the coming year. The five statements have been incorporated in the attached Policy Goals and Objectives for the FY 2015/16 Budget and will work in concert with the Commission's seven long-term policy goals, which are: " Promote mobility; " Mitigate and address the impact of goods movement; " Encourage economic development; " Ensure improved system efficiencies; " Foster environmental stewardship; " Support transportation choices through intermodalism and accessibility; and " Prioritize public and agency communications. The Commission's Financial and Administrative Policies are also included in the Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the FY 2015/16 Budget. " Attachment: Proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for FY 2015/16 Budget Agenda Item 9 212 " " " Commission Policy Goals and Objectives At its January 2015 workshop, the Commission discussed its vision related to the future of the County's transportation system. This process resulted in five statements that state the Commission's guiding principles: RCTC's Guiding Principles " Together, we are imagining and implementing an efficient transportation system for the good of all in Riverside County. " We are the people we serve. Economic prosperity and quality of life is enhanced with proper transportation. The public trust is vital to our mission. " We operate in a dynamic environment. We will remain flexible in order to respond to change and opportunity. We will focus on projects and allocate funds that support the quality of life in Riverside County. We collaborate in partnerships to maximize our ability to get people where they want to go and when they want to get there. " Our priority is to serve the public need. We will invest in a transportation system that moves community members, visitors, and goods. This system will support our economy and our future prosperity and is vital to attract and retain quality jobs to our region. " We are dedicated to environmental stewardship. We will use existing regional and countywide plans, such as the Riverside County Integrated Plan, as a framework for our decisions. We know that goods moving to, within, and through the County are vital to our economy; however we desire and will work toward a future where there is a balance between goods movement and our quality of life. In addition to financial and administration policies, the Commission has seven long-term policy goals that support the Commission's vision for transportation in Riverside County: promote mobility, mitigate and address the impact of goods movement, encourage economic development, ensure improved system efficiencies, foster environmental stewardship, support transportation choices through intermodalism and accessibility, and prioritize public and agency communications. For each of these policy goals, the objectives and initiatives that were considered in the framework of the work plan for the FY 2015/16 budget are identified below. While Riverside County shows signs of economic recovery, the Commission remains cautious about reveriue availability. The need for better transportation remains a top public priority as demonstrated in the Commission's vision statements, and the Commission is poised to address this challenge via the seven policy goals. In moving forward with an aggressive program of projects and services, the Commission may face fluctuating Measure A, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), and Transportation Development Act (TOA) revenues and uncertainty regarding the availability of federal and state transportation revenues. Due to the long-term nature of many of the Commission's programs, many of the policy goals' objectives and initiatives are ongoing from year to year. Promote Mobility The Commission, in cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies, will strive to create a transportation system that promotes efficient mobility both within the County and region. " " " " Continue to aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, and construction processes on key components of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice with the continued development of tolled express lanes on State Route 91 and Interstate 15. Continue to provide leadership in the planning and development of the Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service through the Alternatives Analysis Report and continue to seek out grant opportunities with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for phase II funding. Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley, including Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and Sun line Transit Agency (Sun line) to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities. Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A ordinance and determine use(s) for any unexpended revenues. 213 " Complete environmental studies and develop an implementation plan for future phases of the Mid County Parkway project. " Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the SR-79 realignment project. " Continue to collaborate with state and federal agencies and local partners to develop and fund projects programmed in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), Proposition lB bond programs, Active Transportation Program, Cap and Trade Programs, and Measure A program as well as other high priority regional projects. " Maximize obtaining all available transportation funds and strategically program funds to meet funding deadlines and to prevent the lapse and loss of funds. " leverage the effective application and use of Measure A Western County regional arterial and other state and federal funds to deliver eligible regional arterial projects. " Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the TUMF Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in Western County. " Actively participate in the SR-91 Advisory Committee to facilitate near and long-term improvements to SR-91, enhance intercounty public transit options, and foster mobility improvements between the two counties. " Advocate streamlining efforts at the state and federal levels that will reduce costs, time, and delays currently associated with project delivery including, but not limited to, timely project reviews and approvals. " Continue active engagement in state and federal efforts to streamline and reform California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to improve the ability to deliver critical projects that enhance mobility within the County and the region. " Continue to coordinate and provide public access to commuter information via the IE511 system and focus commuter assistance and IE511 outreach efforts under one brand. " Continue cooperation with the FTA regarding the Small Starts process to support the completion of construction and initiation of the Perris Valley line (PVL) commuter rail service in 2015. " Continue to work with the public transit operators to control costs and increase system efficiencies in order to accommodate and adjust to fluctuating revenues from local, state and federal sources. " Continue to develop transit service to further promote seamless intracity, intercity and regional transit connectivity for County residents. " Consider future rail expansion opportunities including the potential for extension of the PVL to the Hemet/San Jacinto and Temecula areas. Mitigate and Address the Impact of Goods Movement The Commission will work with federal, state, and local governments to facilitate the movement of goods and services to, within, and through the County, recognizing the vital role goods movement mobility plays in the economic health of the County, the State, and the nation. " Seek funding and local agency concurrence to implement the Commission's approved, high-priority railroad grade separation list to mitigate the impact of increased goods movement demands on the transportation system. " Encourage Congress to create a federal freight trust fund, or similar program with a dedicated and firewalled revenue structure, in order to treat the nation's multimodal national goods movement network as a system rather than individual projects. " Remain committed to a regional approach regarding goods movement issues in order to maximize funding from state and federal sources to goods movement needs in Southern California. " Continue working with the Ports and regional transportation commissions to develop a funding mechanism for needed projects and mitigation on a regional basis. " Provide input to the National Freight Advisory Committee regarding the establishment of a national freight network and California State Freight Advisory Committee regarding regional freight priorities. 214 " " " " " " Encourage Economic Development Transportation decisions will consider the economic benefits derived from any improvement, and, where feasible and practical, will pursue transportation alternatives that enhance or complement economic development. " Commit to seek opportunities related to transportation projects that will create jobs and improve the economic base in the County. " Support local agencies in the design and construction of interchanges that are in proximity to regional economic centers and developments. " Support local projects, consistent with countywide transportation goals and Commission commitments, which enhance business development, local employment, and area tourism. Ensure Improved System Efficiencies The Commission will select projects and allocate funds in a manner that will improve safety and reduce congested traffic corridors. " Advocate the development and use of advanced technologies for transportation applications that are affordable and practical. " In partnership with SANBAG, continue to implement enhancements to IE511 for improved deployment of real-time traffic information, real-time bus and rail transit trip planning information, and rideshare information available to commuters for the purpose of trip planning and reducing congestion. " Assure the effectiveness of transit planning through coordination with the County's eight transit operators, Citizens' Advisory Committee, and annual SRTP process with a goal toward promoting program productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness. " Provide innovative commuter rideshare programs to reduce single occupant vehicle trips. " Collaborate with local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the California Highway Patrol (CHP} to continue efficient delivery of a comprehensive motorist aid system which includes an IE511 traveler information service, a call box program, and a Freeway Service Patrol (FSP} program, including temporary services in freeway construction zones. " Leverage resources to incorporate park and ride facilities and additional connecting bus service at Metrolink stations that may have available capacity. " Continue working with Caltrans to monitor traffic conditions for the purpose of focusing transportation funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies. " Collaborate with Caltrans and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of the highways and regional arterials. " Support the implementation of active transportation facilities that support transportation alternatives. Foster Environmental Stewardship The Commission will achieve its mobility goals while promoting environmental stewardship and protecting the area's natural resources and quality of life. " Continue working with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), Caltrans, and state/federal resource agencies to implement the MSHCP. " Collaborate with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD}, sub-regional agencies, and local jurisdictions to implement the current RTP and sustainable communities' strategy that meets regional air quality goals, conformity guidelines, and SB 375 California's Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375} green house reduction targets for the SCAG region. " Support a variety of outreach channels and educational programs that promote the benefits of ridesharing, public and specialized transit, rail, and availability of commuter resources for the purposes of reducing vehicle trips, vehicle miles traveled, and emissions . " Facilitate private/public use of clean fuels technology. 215 " Continue to develop sustainable and green commuter rail stations and provide upgrades and rehabilitation projects to reduce the environmental impact of the existing stations. Support Transportation Choices Through lntermodalism and Accessibility County residents will be served, where economically feasible, through tile development of transportation alternatives and travel options that consider the needs of a wide range of citizens. " Work with transit providers and local social service agencies to provide specialized transit service to meet a broad spectrum of socio-economic transit needs of seniors, veterans, persons with disabilities, and low income residents. " Leverage commuter and motorist assistance outreach channels in order to increase the awareness and use of alternative commuting modes. " Implement the Commission's commuter rail SRTPs and Southern California Regional Rail Authority's (SCRRA's) plan for Metrolink commuter rail services. " Continue to pursue the goals and objectives as outlined in the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) for Riverside County related to a unified, comprehensive but flexible strategy for transportation service delivery to address transportation gaps between current services and needs of elderly individuals, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited income. " Enhance security, surveillance, and emergency response capabilities of County transit facilities and roadway infrastructure through proactive planning, interagency coordination, and investment. " Collaborate with public transit operators to ensure connecting bus service to new PVL stations. Prioritize Public and Agency Communications The Commission will provide timely, informative, and accurate reporting to encourage informed public and agency participation in the Commission's decision-making processes. " Promote a close working relationship with news and civic entities to increase interest and understanding of transportation and related issues. " Enhance the provision of public information through various forms of communication (e.g., website, annual report, monthly newsletter, television, Speakers Bureau, print media, radio, etc.). " Maintain an ongoing effort of informing Riverside County's Congressional and State Legislative delegations regarding transportation issues. " Develop an effective long-range legislative strategy regarding state and federal funding and policy. " Protect and enhance flexibility in the Commission's use of state and federal transportation revenue in addressing regional priorities and needs. " Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality-of-life needs for Riverside County. " Seek legislative flexibility for innovation in financing, construction, and maintenance of regional transportation projects. " Pursue policy objectives contained in the Commission's comprehensive adopted legislative platforms. " Maintain ongoing efforts to educate commuters, businesses, and the public regarding the Commission's toll planning efforts and specific project development efforts underway. " Keep the public informed about construction-related impacts from projects. Financial and Administration Policies Financial Planning Policies " Administrative costs, including salaries and benefits, shall be funded by allocations from Measure A, LTF, FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds. " The Commission shall budget no more than one percent (1%) of Measure A sales tax revenues for administrative salaries and benefits. 216 " " " " " " " Administrative program delivery costs will be budgeted at whatever is reasonable and necessary, but not to exceed four percent (4%) of Measure A sales tax revenues (inclusive of the one-percent salary limitation). The Commission shall budget 100% of the annual required contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. " The Commission shall utilize unexpended 1989 Measure A funds only for projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A. Sales tax revenues from the 2009 Measure A shall be expended only for projects and programs included in the 2009 Measure A. " Amounts will be budgeted by fiscal year for multi-year projects, based on best available estimates, with the understanding that, to the extent actuals vary from those estimates and the project is ongoing, adjustments will be made on a continual basis. " The fiscal capital budget should be consistent with the strategic plan and deviations appropriately noted, explained, and justified. " A balanced budget shall be adopted annually with operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses equal to or less than identified revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances. Revenue Policies " Sales tax revenue projections will be revised semi-annually to ensure use of current and relevant data. Staff may adjust annual amounts during the budget preparation process to reflect the most current economic trends. " A strategic application of local funding sources will be used to maximize federal and state funding of projects. " Fiduciary responsibility regarding Western County TUMF revenues shall be exercised, and revenues will be allocated pursuant to Commission direction and the approved 2009 Measure A. " Adopted toll revenue policies will establish congestion pricing in order to maximize throughput on toll facilities. Such pricing will be adjusted quarterly by pre-defined formulas. " Proceeds from the disposition, in accordance with federal, state and local regulations, of excess properties owned by the Commission will be returned to the programs which provided the funding sources for the property acquisition. Debt Management Policies " The Debt Management Policy, as revised on April 10, 2013, and the Interest Rate Swap Policy, as adopted July 12, 2006, shall be updated as necessary for matters related to sales tax revenue and toll-supported indebtedness. " Outstanding sales tax revenue bonds shall not exceed $975 million. " Toll revenue supported debt may be issued for specific highway projects and may comprise toll revenue bonds and federal loans. " The Commission will maintain 2.0x debt ratio coverage on all senior sales tax revenue debt and l.3x debt ratio coverage on all toll revenue debt. " Debt issuance will be for major capital projects including engineering, right of way, and construction. Operating requirements, if any, must be paid from current ongoing revenues and may not be financed except for initial toll operations. " Costs of issuance, including the standard underwriter's discount, will not exceed two percent (2%). " The Commission may enter into interest rate swaps to better manage assets and liabilities and take advantage of market conditions to lower overall costs and reduce interest rate risk. " While it is the intent of the Commission to establish a cash debt reserve for long term bond issuance, as necessary, surety bonds can be obtained when beneficial to the Commission. " All sales tax revenue debt must mature prior to the termination of 2009 Measure A on June 30, 2039. " All toll revenue supported debt must mature prior to the expiration of toll facility agreements . 217 Expenditure Accountability Policies • Established priorities for planning and programming of capital projects will be reviewed annually with the Commission. • Actual expenditures will be compared to the budget on at least a quarterly basis, and significant deviations will be appropriately noted, explained, and justified. • Operations and maintenance agreements for toll operations will be implemented, and related costs will be compared to toll financing assumptions. Reserve Policies • The Commission will maintain program reserves in accordance with Measure A and TOA policies and guidelines. • The Commission will establish and maintain a transit operator's reserve of ten percent (10%) for the Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. Additionally, a ten percent (10%) reserve will be established and maintained for each of the Western County transit operators (public bus and commuter rail). • The Commission will establish and maintain reserves for toll operations, capital improvements, and debt service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements. Cash Management and Investment Policies • Where possible, the Commission will encourage receipt of funds by wire transfer to its accounts. • Balances in the bank operating account will be maintained at the amount necessary to meet monthly expenditures. • Construction and operating funds will be invested per the Commission's established Investment Policy, as revised on September 10, 2014, emphasizing in order of priority: 1) safety, 2) liquidity, and 3) yield. • Cash disbursements to local jurisdictions and vendors/consultants will be completed in an expeditious and timely manner. Procurement Policies • The Commission will conduct enhanced outreach to businesses and contractors located in Riverside County regarding opportunities to provide the Commission with competitive and qualified goods and/or services. • The Commission will continuously evaluate its procurement program and policies to ensure competitive, transparent, objective, and fair selection processes. • The Commission will continue to expand and improve vendor access to contracting opportunities. Auditing, Accounting, and Financial Reporting Policies • The Commission will maintain its enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in order to integrate project and toll operations accounting needs and improve accounting efficiency. • The Commission will issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR); separate financial reports for the LTF, STA, Proposition 1B Rehabilitation and Security Project Accounts, and toll operations upon commencement of such operations; and State Controller's Transportation Planning Agency Financial Transactions Report as well as Government Compensation in California Report. • An audit is to be conducted annually on the Commission's accounting books and records. As long as the Commission has outstanding bonds and federal loans, an independent accounting firm must conduct the audit. • The Commission is responsible for ensuring that audits of Measure A and TOA funding recipients are completed and reviewed for compliance and other matters in a timely manner. 218 • • • " " " Human Resources Management Policies " While accommodating the assumption of toll operation responsibilities, Commission staffing levels will be consistent with the intent of its enabling legislation, which envisioned a small, but effective staff. " Contract staff and consultants will be used to augment staff efforts as much as necessary to support programs or workloads, which do not appear to be of a permanent nature. Information Technology Management Policy " Significant effort will be made to maintain efficient and cost-effective technology infrastructure by continuously upgrading network equipment and software to ensure quality performance, productivity, and connectivity among staff, other agencies, toll operator, and the public. Network security will continue to be a top priority to maintain the integrity of the Commission's network and information. Linking Commission Policy Goals and Departmental Goals and Objectives The following matrix (Table 19) illustrates the linkage of the Commission's overall policy goals described in this section to the individual departmental goals and objectives included in Section 6. Table 19-Relationship Between Commission and Departmental Goals 219 Budget Policy Goals and Objectives •Guiding policies •Goals and Objectives Fiscal Year 2015/16 program •Correlate to guiding policies •Public hearings open in May •Adopt budget by June 1s1h 3/11/2015 1 3/11/2015 .· · .r~J~s ~-atieY·f!\i:syst~~ •. ··.· ..• •·QUalit .. ...• · ilityJo;r~s··. . ~:;~h~nge a· ~~c~~~~tl~i~ ~aft . dlcat~H to enviroQJYt1~···1 illi;U ,,-~i1Afwit*~~,H"f~1f:.: 2 3/11/2015 June 10 -Ca~mission closes ~R~1iC hearing and adopts budget 3 " " " 12=0 � .% .4}11 N \\_• - _ /_- , tadi.f ` '1.k011k . 2' = .: N114* ,w- j��. • in, �. % 2K :)\r'� ,\_-� r" , _ ,, . . . � /411 ..- ' . . I _ `i. I " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Study Ad Hoc Committee Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Study -Purpose and Need Statement COACHELLA VALLEY-SAN GORGONIO PASS RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY AD HOC COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to review and comment on the draft Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Study Purpose and Need Statement. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In June 2014, the Commission entered into an agreement with HDR, Inc to provide forecasting services intended to provide the foundation a service development plan (SDP) for Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass rail corridor. The SDP must meet the specification and approval of the Federal Railway Administration (FRA). All project tasks are designed to provide for adherence to FRA requirements with the ultimate goal to have the project eligible for federal funding. The scope of services for this effort is divided into four phases and requires a significant amount of preparatory work before the SDP can be completed. Additionally, funding has been identified for only the first two phases, which will result in the alternatives analysis. Staff has submitted for an FRA planning grant and is pursuing other grant opportunities intended to address funding for phases three and four. DISCUSSION: With this report, it is staff's intention to deliver the first product to originate from phase one of the scope of services. This product is the Purpose and Need Statement and it is an important foundational piece as it becomes the guiding document for the entire study by focusing on the need for the service to address specific transportation problems. In addition to a description of the existing transportation issues along the corridor, the document also addresses current transportation facilities and services as well as the performance of the system itself . Agenda Item 10 220 It is staff's intent to take comments on the Purpose and Need Statement from the Commission and various project stakeholders and to respond as appropriate prior to finalizing the document. Additionally, staff intends to discuss the project schedule, next steps, and the initiation of targeted outreach to Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass stakeholders. There is no impact on the project budget or contract. Attachment: Draft Purpose and Need Statement Agenda Item 10 221 • • • " " " COACHELLA VALLEY -SAN GORGONIO PASS RAIL CORRIDOR PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Draft -February 5, 2015 Context and Framework The basic purpose of the Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Study is to identify transportation service improvements for interregional trips between the Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass area and the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area. (For the sake of simplicity, this document refers to these trips as traveling between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin.) The Purpose and Need Statement is the guiding document for the study. It identifies the specific transportation problems and needs to be addressed, as well as the purpose and objectives to be achieved by the service improvements. Alternative improvements must be designed to address the purpose and need, and the evaluation process will compare alternatives on the basis of how well they achieve the identified objectives. The Purpose and Need Statement is organized in two sections: the first identifies improvement needs, and the second identifies the purpose and key objectives for the service. The section on transportation needs begins with a summary of the problems and needs, followed by discussions of the corridor and its transportation system, system performance, and the interregional transportation problems that drive the need for this study. The section on purpose begins with a list of the transportation service objectives, followed by a list of key performance objectives relating to project benefits, impacts, and costs that will be used to compare alternatives. Need for Transportation Improvements Summary of Problems and Needs " " " For interregional travel between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin, there are very limited alternatives to driving a private vehicle. People who do not own a vehicle have very limited ability to travel between the regions, and people who might prefer not to drive do not have a viable alternative. Interstate 10 through the San Gorgonio Pass carries virtually all travelers moving between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin in addition to interstate traffic including trucks. When the highway is shut down for an emergency or incident management, there is no reasonable alternative route or service to carry travelers between the two regions. Congested highway conditions cause delays for longer-distance corridor driving trips, and future growth will result in more congestion and even longer travel times . 1 222 " In short, the need is for transportation service linking the Coachella Valley and Pass Area with the Los Angeles Basin that can provide a viable interregional travel alternative for a variety of travel purposes. Description of the Study Corridor The Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Corridor links the eastern deserts of Southern California with the urbanized areas comprising the Los Angeles Basin. The Los Angeles Basin, which includes the urbanized areas of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties, has a population over 16 million and employment of seven million. The Coachella Valley has a permanent population approaching 450,000, which increases substantially during winter months with part-time residents from colder climates. The Coachella Valley has an employment base of almost 170,000, and is a center of renowned tourist destinations -including resorts, casinos, festivals, golf and tennis tournaments, and natural attractions -that attract a total of 12.2 million annual visitors from Southern California and around the world. The San Gorgonio Pass Area -comprised of the cities of Banning, Beaumont, and Calimesa, and the unincorporated community of Cabazon -has a population over 72,000 and employment over 15,000 including a major resort/casino and outlet mall. The Coachella Valley and Pass Area are home to a substantial population of economically disadvantaged people, many of whom do not own an automobile and must depend on rail and bus services for transportation. Four of the nine incorporated cities in the Coachella Valley, containing over 40 percent of the Valley's population, have poverty rates exceeding 14 percent (which is the poverty rate for Riverside County, California, and the United States). Two of the nine incorporated cities have poverty rates that exceed 25 percent. In addition, two of the unincorporated communities of the Coachella Valley have poverty rates approaching 50 percent. In the Pass Area, two cities and Cabazon, which collectively comprise 89 percent of the area's population, have poverty rates exceeding the county's average rate of 14 percent. The corridor includes a number of communities classified as SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities by the California Environmental Protection (CalEPA). These communities are specifically targeted for investment of proceeds from the state's cap-and-trade program, for the purpose of improving public health, quality of life and economic opportunity in California's 2 223 " " " " " " most burdened communities at the same time they're reducing pollution that causes climate change. The map below highlights the disadvantaged communities in the eastern half of the corridor, which include much of the eastern Coachella Valley and part of the city of Beaumont. The corridor is projected to grow substantially in the coming years. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) estimates the Los Angeles Basin will grow more than 20 percent by 2035, to a total population exceeding 20 million with employment approaching 9 million. The Coachella Valley is projected to be one of the fastest-growing areas in the state during this timeframe, with the permanent population projected to double to almost 900,000 and employment growing by 83 percent to over 300,000. The Pass Area population is projected to more than double to 170,000 with employment more than doubling to 34,000. The Coachella Valley and Los Angeles Basin are separated by major mountain ranges, and virtually all travel between them flows through the San Gorgonio Pass, the only direct route between the two areas. On a typical weekday, 130,000 people travel through the Pass. Significantly, only about half (55%) of these trips have their eastern terminus in the Coachella Valley. The remaining trips have their eastern terminus in the high desert areas of Yucca Valley and Twentynine Palms (14%), or travel east to Blythe and Phoenix (27%), or south to the Imperial Valley {4%). The trips encompass a variety of purposes, with work commute trips comprising the largest single trip purpose -the Southern California Association of Governments estimates, and cell phone trip data provided by AirSage confirms, approximately 13,000 commuters make the daily round trip through the Pass. Leisure and social/recreational trips increase these travel flows on weekends, with 45 percent more trips being made through the Pass on a typical Friday than a typical midweek day. This number can grow even greater on weekends when major festivals and events are held. On the highest travel weekend of the year, which includes Easter and the Coachella Festival, 125 percent more trips travel through the Pass than on a typical midweek day . 3 224 Transportation Facilities and Services in the Corridor Rail and bus service that links the Coachella Valley with the Los Angeles Basin currently consists of five services, each of which is limited in terms of geographic reach or hours of service: 1. The Amtrak Sunset Limited, which travels between Los Angeles and New Orleans by way of Yuma, Tucson, and El Paso. The service operates three days per week, with corridor stops in Pomona, Ontario, and Palm Springs. The stops in Palm Springs occur in the middle of the night -at 2:02 a.m. en route to Los Angeles and at 12:36 a.m. en route to New Orleans -and the Palm Springs Amtrak station is located in a remote area north of the city that has no connecting transit service. 2. Amtrak Thruway intercity bus coaches, which carry Amtrak passengers from the Coachella Valley to train connections in Fullerton and Bakersfield, with two round trips per day to each. The Thruway service has Coachella Valley stops in Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, and Palm Springs, and at Cabazon in the San Gorgonio Pass. A Thruway ticket can only be purchased as part of a train journey, so the only Coachella Valley-to- Los Angeles Basin trips it can serve are those traveling to cities along the Pacific Surfliner route north or south of Fullerton. • 3. Sunline's Commuter Link 220 provides commuter bus service between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County, covering a 73-mile route. This service operates on • a schedule designed to serve commuters with their home in the Coachella Valley-two trips are operated weekday mornings westbound to Riverside, with two trips returning eastbound to the Coachella Valley weekday afternoon/evenings. The service has Coachella Valley stops in Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage, and Pass Area stops in Cabazon, Banning, and Beaumont. In Riverside Commuter Link 220 stops at the Metrolink station, where riders can catch trains to travel to other parts of the Los Angeles Basin. 4. Beaumont Commuter Link 120 provides express bus service between Beaumont and the San Bernardino Metrolink station, with stops in Calimesa and at the Loma Linda Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital. The service makes seven round trips throughout the day each weekday (no weekend service), with the first bus leaving Beaumont at 5:35 a.m. and the last bus arriving back in Beaumont at 7:25 p.m. In San Bernardino riders can catch Metrolink trains to travel to other parts of the Los Angeles Basin. This service originates in the western part of the Pass, so it does not directly serve Banning, Cabazon, or the Coachella Valley. 5. Greyhound, the private intercity bus operator, operates direct service between Los Angeles and Indio, with seven weekday trips from Los Angeles to Indio and six from Indio to Los Angeles. About half of these trips extend to Phoenix. Intermediate stops are made on some of these trips in El Monte, Claremont, Riverside, San Bernardino, Banning, and the Palm Springs Amtrak station. From these stations, Greyhound • 4 225 " " " provides connecting service to six other locations throughout the Los Angeles Basin - Perris, Anaheim, Santa Ana, Long Beach, North Hollywood, and San Fernando. A single highway, 1-10, traverses the Pass to connect the Coachella Valley with the Los Angeles Basin. East of the Pass the Coachella Valley is served by a network of arterial roads, though only two roads, 1-10 and SR-111, carry traffic to the eastern end of the Pass. West of the Pass, SR-60 splits off from 1-10 in the city of Beaumont, with 1-10 traveling into the Basin through Redlands and San Bernardino, and SR-60 entering the Basin through Moreno Valley and Riverside. The Los Angeles Basin is served by an extensive network of highway and arterial roads; the three main east-west highways that cross the region and carry traffic to the western end of the Pass include 1-10, SR-60, and SR-91. Performance of the Transportation System The highway routes serving the corridor are subject to regular recurring congestion that can substantially increase travel times. Congestion affects westbound travel in the morning peak and eastbound travel in the afternoon peak. Typical weekday congestion levels are more severe than Saturdays or Sundays; the heaviest congestion occurs on Friday afternoon in the eastbound direction, as evidenced by the typical driving times for the 128-mile trip between downtown Los Angeles and Indio: 5 226 DRIVING TIME BETWEEN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES AND INDIO (in minutes) Eastbound Westbound Morning Peak Afternoon Peak Morning Peak Afternoon Peak Midweek day 114 140 141 114 Friday 112 I 165 130 119 Areas of recurring congestion are in the western half of the corridor (see map below); the eastern half of the corridor is relatively congestion-free unless an incident closes freeway lanes. • Since 1-10 is the only road through the Pass, corridor travel is susceptible to significant • disruption if an incident closes the roadway for any period of time. In the past ten years, four separate incidents in the Pass have disrupted travel for several hours: • June 2005: A high-speed pursuit of a homicide suspect led to gunfire and a 12-hour shutdown of the freeway near Cabazon. Stranded drivers slept in their cars while others needed medical attention due to the heat. • December 2010: A fatal collision involving a big rig and a spill of fertilizer and diesel oil near Whitewater closed 1-10 for six hours. • February 2012: A broken computer system led to a delay in concrete slabs needed for lanes that were ground up during repaving. Three of the four westbound lanes were closed for almost a full day, leading to a 25-mile backup in Banning and traffic spilling into Palm Springs. • September 2014: A fiery big rig crash shut down westbound 1-10 east of Cabazon. Three of the four westbound lanes were closed all morning. Rail and transit travel can take much more time than normal highway travel because the trip is indirect, involves intermediate stops, and usually requires mode transfers. The following table illustrates each service's current travel time between Los Angeles and Indio (or the service's easternmost point), with the Sunline and Beaumont bus trips extended to Downtown Los Angeles using Metrolink service, and the current daily ridership. 6 227 • " " " Western Eastern Existing Terminus Terminus Travel time (in minutes) daily ridership Sunset Limited Los Angeles Palm Springs 156 6 (riders/train) Amtrak Thruway Los Angeles Indio 240 48 Sun line CL 220 + Los Angeles Palm Desert 234 70 Metrolink Beaumont CL 120 + Los Angeles Metrolink Beaumont 145 n/a. Greyhound Los Angeles Indio 240 n/a Specific Transportation Problems in the Corridor 1. Lack of Transportation Options The primary transportation problem driving the need for this study is the lack of transportation alternatives to the private vehicle for travel between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin. Existing services are limited, and not convenient for most travelers because of service timing, frequency, or poor connections: " The Amtrak Sunset Limited operates only three times per week, it stops in Palms Springs after midnight at a station location 2.5 miles from the edge of the developed part of the city, and there is no connecting service to provide access to the station; " The Amtrak Thruway service carries only travelers with a ticket to ride on an Amtrak train, and provides only two round trips each day to the Amtrak station in Fullerton; " The schedule of Sunline Commuter Link 220 only serves the needs of commuters, with two weekday trips into Riverside in the morning and two trips back to the Coachella Valley at the end of the normal work day; " The Beaumont Commuter Link 120 travels only as far east as Beaumont, so it does not serve the eastern part of the Pass Area or the Coachella Valley, and it provides no weekend service; and " Greyhound does not conveniently serve most corridor travelers from the Coachella Valley, as its Indio station is located in the eastern end of the corridor and its Palm Springs stop is at the Amtrak station which in a remote location with no transit access. Also, the Los Angeles station is located about two miles away from Los Angeles Union Station, so it is not conveniently located in terms of transit access to locations in the western end of the corridor. For people who do not own a vehicle, an alternative transportation service could provide the opportunity to make trips that they are unable to make currently because of the limited travel options. This includes economically disadvantaged people who cannot afford to own a car and people who choose not to own a car, some of whom reside in livable communities with good access to transit service . 7 228 2. Need for Transportation Alternative During 1-10 Emergency Closures There is a need for alternative transportation through the Pass during incidents and emergencies that close 1-10. 1-10 carries all travelers between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin except the few who drive the mountain roads or ride the Sunset Limited. Through the Pass, there is no parallel road alternative. Therefore, when 1-10 is shut down through the Pass during an emergency or major incident, travel between the two regions comes to a halt. 3. Need for Alternative Mode with Reliable Travel Time Performance Corridor transportation performance is being degraded by congestion, and an alternative transportation service could provide a viable travel option. Congested highway conditions substantially increase the peak period travel time on the corridor's three key highways - 1-10, SR-60 and SR-91. The congested highway segments lie in the western half of the corridor, so the corridor travelers affected by congestion are primarily those traveling from Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Future growth in the corridor and the accompanying increases in travel demand will exacerbate the existing congestion problems and further increase peak travel times .. Purpose and Objectives for Transportation Improvements The study will identify and evaluate alternative transportation service improvements to achieve the following objectives: • Provides travelers between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin with an alternative to driving that offers more competitive travel time than currently available services; • Provides travelers between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin with an alternative to driving that offers reliable travel schedules; • Serves a range of trip purposes traveling between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin, particularly including commute trips to work and social, medical, leisure, and recreational trips; • Improves regional travel opportunities between the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin for transit dependent people; • Is planned to serve the expected population growth in the Coachella Valley and the Los Angeles Basin; • Offers the potential for future expansion to serve the travel corridor between Los Angeles and Phoenix; and • Improves the ability of the transportation system to serve travel needs through the San Gorgonio Pass in the event of an incident or emergency that closes 1-10. • • The alternatives identified to meet the above service objectives will be evaluated and • compared in terms of their ability to achieve the following performance objectives: 8 229 " " " " The service should be cost-effective to implement and to operate. " There should be plausible and financially sustainable potential sources of funding for up- front capital costs and ongoing operations/maintenance costs. " The selected alternative should maximize ridership potential to the extent practical and consistent with achieving cost-effectiveness. " The selected alternative should have station locations that support the objectives of maximizing ridership potential and providing service with competitive travel time in a manner consistent with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) corridor planning guidelines. " The selected alternative should minimize up-front capital investment while maximizing ridership potential. " The selected alternative should promote sustainable interregional transportation options, providing improved mobility while reducing energy consumption and supporting livable communities. " The selected alternative should minimize related environmental adverse effects (e.g., air quality/greenhouse gas emissions, natural resources) to the extent practical. " The selected service alternative and recommended phasing strategy should be able to achieve near-term improvement in transportation mobility for trips through the Pass while leading to a long-term strategy that optimizes achievement of all the objectives . 9 230 Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Study Project Status Update Commission Meeting March 11, 2015 • Project Vision: Intercity (Amtrak) rail service between the cities of Los Angeles and Indio • Goals: Provide integrated and sustainable mobility alternative Promote economic opportunities Foster more livable communities 3/11/2015 1 " Amtrak has legislative authority from Congress to operate on private railroads. Potential impacts on private railroad operations must be identified and addressed cooperatively with the railroads. " Technical Advisory Committee, quarterly meetings " Ad Hoc Committee meetings " Individual briefings with elected officials to gather project insights: 13 held to date " Briefing planned with Palm Springs Convention/Visitors Bureau " Meetings with CalTrans Division of Rail " Meeting with US Senator Feinstein's office " Meetings with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 3/11/2015 2 " " " " " " February 23, Banning, 22 participants February 25, Technical Advisory Committee meeting February 26, Palm Desert, 75 participants+ 56 via webcast Project survey distributed at meetings and online Notification via postcards, newspaper ads, news/radio, web announcements, social media, and city postings FRA Service Development process: Determines service potential and timeline. Identifies potential impacts on private railroad operations and addresses them cooperatively with the railroads. Provides basis for obtaining federal funding for capital projects. Secures environmental clearance for passen for capital projects. 3/11/2015 3 1. Preliminary Service Development Planning and Alternatives Analysis/Includes establishment of project purpose and need. 2. Service Development Plan, Conceptual Engineering, and Tier l/Program EIS/EIR. 3. Preliminary Engineering, Tier 2/Project-level EIS/EIR. 4. Final Design and Construction. 3/11/2015 4 " Market Analysis " -�~~ Purpose and Need Statement " Alternatives Identification " Preliminary Service Planning Corridor Demographics Transportation Facilities and Services Travel Volumes and Trip Patterns Transportation System Performance " Alternatives Evaluation Ridership, Costs, Benefits, Environmental Constraints Los Angeles Basin Coachella Valley " 16.5 million population " 443,000 population " 7.2 million jobs " 12.2 million annual visitors Sources: SCAG 2012 RTP/SCS; Greater Palm Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau 3/11/2015 5 3/11/2015 • Sunset Limited (rail): 3 trains/week, late night service • Sunline Commuter Link 220 (bus): 2 trips to Riverside in a.m . 2 trips from Riverside in p.m. • Beaumont Commuter Link 120 (bus): 7 daily round trips Monday-Friday • Amtrak Thruway (bus connecting to Amtrak Pacific Surfliner): 2 round trips/day, only for Amtrak rail passengers • Key corridor highways include: o 1-10, SR-60, and SR-91 through the Los Angeles Basin o 1-10 and SR-111 through the Coachella Valley • 1-10 is the only roadway through San Gorgonio Pass 6 " " 130,000 weekday person-trips through San Gorgonio Pass o 55 percent to/from Coachella Valley o 27 percent toward Blythe and Phoenix o 14 percent to/from High Desert (Yucca Valley, Joshua Tree, and Twentynine Palms) o 4 percent toward Imperial Valley Higher volumes on weekend days: Friday +45 percent Saturday +48 percent Sunday +53 percent Sources: SCAG 2012 RTP/SCS; Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS); AirSage April/May 2014 3/11/2015 7 Source: Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS) Rail and Transit Travel Times Corridor Problems and Needs • There are very limited options to driving a private vehicle for interregional travel (Coachella Valley to Los Angeles Basin) • Emergencies or incidents closing 1-10 through San Gorgonio Pass severely disrupt corridor travel • Congested highway conditions in the western part of the corridor cause delays for longer-distance driving trips, which will get worse in the future 3/11/2015 8 Purpose and Objectives for Transportation Improvements • Provide an alternative to driving that offers more competitive travel time than current services. • Provide an alternative to driving that offers more reliable travel schedules. • Serve a range of trip purposes including commute trips, and social, medical, leisure, and recreational trips. • Improve regional travel opportunities for transit-dependent people. • Serve expected regional growth. • Offer potential for future service expansion to Phoenix. • Improve the transportation system's ability to serve travel needs in the event of 1-10 closure. Performance Objectives • Be cost-effective to implement and operate. • Have plausible and sustainable potential sources of funding for capital costs and operations/maintenance costs. • Maximize ridership potential while providing cost-effective service. • Have station locations that help maximize ridership while supporting competitive travel times. • Minimize up-front capital investment while maximizing ridership potential. • Promote sustainable transportation options, improving mobility while reducing energy consumption and supporting livable communities. • Minimize related environmental adverse impacts to the extent practical. • Achieve near-term mobility improvement and lead to long-term strategy that optimizes all objectives. 3/11/2015 9 " Screen the range of rail alternatives (per FRA guidelines) to eliminate those far too expensive or not feasible. " Solicit public input on alternatives to study. " Identify a set of alternatives (rail and bus) for more detailed screening. West of Colton 1. LAUS-Fullerton-Riverside 2. LAUS-Pomona-Riverside 3. LAUS-Pomona-Ontario 4. LAUS-Montclair-San Bernardino 5. LAUS-Montclair-San Bernardino East of Colton 1-5. Loma Linda -Cabazon -Palm Springs -Rancho Mirage -Indio 3/11/2015 10 3/11/2015 11 Paject Highlights The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), in coordination with Caltrans, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), is continuing work on the Coachella Valley- San Gorgonio Pass Corridor Rail Preliminary Service Development Plan. Recent activities include: • RCTC is awaiting word from the FRA about the potential $3 million grant to help fund Phase II of the study, which consists of a Service Development Plan and environmental document. • RCTC's Ad Hoc Policy Committee for the study will meet February 11 to consider the Draft Purpose & Need Statement. Information gained from a market analysis was used to help develop the draft statement. • The study's Technical Advisory Committee will meet February 25 to consider the Draft Purpose & Need Statement. The group, comprised of representatives from local, state and federal transportation agencies, transit operators and corridor cities , met for the first time November 19 . • Public meetings will be held February 23 in Banning and February 26 in Palm Desert to provide input on potential alternatives. The Palm Desert meeting will include a webinar option . Please watch for meeting announcements. • The project website, CVRailProject.info, includes a feature to collect feedback. An updated fact sheet -available in English and Spanish -is posted to the site . "Like us" on Facebook to receive ongoing project updates. Service Development Plan Timeline 2014 Coming Soon February 11, 2015: Ad Hoc Committee Meeting February 23 and 26: Public Meetings February 25: Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Contact Us Sheldon Peterson RCTC Rail Manager speterson@rctc.org 951-787-7141 CVRailProject.info CVRailProject 2015 Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall MARKET ANALYSIS PURPOSE & NEED • DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES We are here ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT updated 1/23/15 Fast Facts • Los Angeles Basin : 16.5 million population, 7 .2 million jobs • Coachella Valley: 443,000 population, 12 .2 million visi t ors • Commuter Tr i ps: 140,000 daily • Route length : 14 1 miles • Proposed initial daily round-trips : 2 • Running t ime Los Angeles- Ind io: 3 hours • Host railroads : Union Pacific, BNSF Railway, SCRR A (M etro\ ink) • Stations be i ng stud ied : Up to 9 • Current phase : Planning/ A lternatives Analysis ---lmnideCounty~Com- Connecting Southern California The Riverside County Transportat ion Commission (RCTC), in coordination with Caltrans, the Federal Railroad Administration and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), is studying the expansion of Amtrak passenger rail service to the Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass . The service is envisioned to provide an integrated, sustainable travel mode, promote economic opportunities and foster more livable communities. Currently, there are very limited transit connections between Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley. This service would provide new travel options between Los Angeles job centers and Coachella Valley tourism destinations. Studying Rail Options, Potential Stations RCTC is analyzing various alignments for the rail system and a number of station locations, in an effort to bring the best service to the region. West of Colton, the route could extend along the Metrolink San Bernardino Line, along the Union Pacific Railroad through Ontario and Pomona, along the Union Pacific Railroad through Riverside and Pomona, or along the BNSF Railway through Riverside and Fullerton . East of Colton, the line could operate on the Union Pacific Yuma Sub Line . Amtrak service is being considered, rather than Metrolink, because Amtrak has legislative authority to operate on private railroads . A number of stations are being studied along the proposed rail alignments, including new stations in Ind io, the Mid-Val ley near Rancho Mirage, the Pass Area and Redlands/ Loma Linda. Federal Railroad Administration Process RCTC is following a process established by the Federal Railroad Administration to determine if rail service can be extended to the Coachella Valley. The process will enable RCTC to : 1. Determine if the project is ready for further study 2. Identify potential impacts to private railroad operations and how to address them cooperative ly with the railroads 3. Provide a basis for obta ining federal funding for the new service 4. Receive environmenta l approva l for the project The timeline for completing this full process is approximately seven years, from the current "Alternatives Analysis /Preliminary Service Development Plan" phase to the "Final Design and Construction" phase . The current phase is expected to be completed in fall 2015 . At that point, RCTC will determine if the project is ready to move to the next stage of planning . Service Development Plan Conceptual Engineering Tier 1/Program EISIEIR 7 Years Corridor Rail Service First Phase of Study Under Way to Determine Service Options RCTC has begun the first phase of the Federal Railroad Administration process, which includes the Alternatives Analysis and Preliminary Service Development Plan . This phase will include the following elements : • Market Analy sis • Purp o se and N ee d Statement • Alternatives Id entific ation • Preliminary Service Planning • Alternatives Evaluation --Ridership, Co sts, Benefits, Environmental Constra ints and Phasing This first phase of study is expected to be completed in fall 2015 . RCTC will use the findings from this first phase to decide whether the project should move forward for further study. If RCTC makes the decision that rail service may be an option, the project then would enter the formal Environmental Document phase to examine potential impacts to the environment and ways to mitigate these impacts. If the project is approved, a Service Development Plan would be created and funding would be explored . RCTC has formed a Technical Advisory Committee comprised of regional stakeholders and an Ad Hoc Committee of its Commission members. Public input also will be critical in the decision making process . Public meetings will be held in February 2015, and RCTC will be encouraging feedback about service routes, stations, ridership and other elements through the meetings, the project webs ite and Facebook. 2014 2015 Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall MARKET ANALYS IS PURPOSE & NEED DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT updaled l/23/15 L EG E ND -Union Pacific RR Alhambra Sub -BNSF Railway San Bernardino Sub - -Union Pacific RR Yuma Sub -Union Pacific RR Los Angeles Sub . . CATCHMENT AREAS : • ' -Existing Stat ion Areas • Not all potential stations will be needed; construction and alignment alternatives will be determined in the future, In itial Proj e ct Supporte rs: R1vers1de County Transportation Commission • County of R1vers1de Supervisors • Coachella Valley Association of Governments • Coachella Valley Economic Partnership • City of Calimesa • City of Cathedral City • City of Corona • City of Indian Wells • City of Eastvale • City of Jurupa Valley • City of Indio • City of La Quinta • City of Palm Desert • City of Palm Springs • City of Temecula • Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau • Southwest Rail Passenger Association " AGENDA ITEM 11 " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 11, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive an update on state and federal legislation;~'\, 2) Adopt a Support position on SB 321 (Beall); and : 3) Add to the Commission's Legislative Platform: "Support legislation that reduces the volatility of state/federal transportation revenue." \ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State Update Governor's State of the State Speech Gives Nod to Transportation Issues Governor Brown's inauguration doubled as his annual State of the State Address in January. In his speech, the Governor highlighted the $59 billion backlog of state highway maintenance needs. Local street and road maintenance needs climb to nearly $80 billion throughout the state. The Governor pointed to transportation maintenance as an area where both parties should be able to achieve common ground and find a solution, although he offered no specifics on what he thought that solution may entail. The transportation industry saw this as a cue that at the very least, transportation state-of-good-repair issues could be addressed in this legislative session. The "fix it first" approach blends well with the Governor's other priorities of greenhouse gas reduction and environmental stewardship. Speaker Atkins' Transportation Funding Proposal At the California Transportation Foundation's annual symposium, Speaker Toni Atkins (D-San Diego) unveiled the Democratic Caucus transportation funding proposal -a $2 billion package of "new" revenue annually ($10 billion over five years). The three elements of the package are as follows: Agenda Item 11 231 " " " $1 billion from restoring truck weight fees to fund transportation projects. Truck weight fees were diverted to the General Fund several years ago, as one of the last remaining transportation revenue streams unprotected by the state Constitution, for the purpose of paying down debt on Proposition 1B bonds. $200 million from accelerated repayment of loans to the General Fund from transportation accounts. Again, transportation accounts provided aid to the General Fund during recent budget crises. $800 million from a new transportation user fee, which could be similar to the Vehicle License Fee or Vehicle Registration Fee. The details on what this fee would be are not yet available. While the legislative process still has a long way to go before this proposal becomes reality, the Speaker's proposal is a significant step towards identifying needed revenue for transportation infrastructure in California. The gas tax continues its decline and the Proposition 1B bond program is officially over. The transportation construction industry-led group Transportation California and the labor-affiliated California Alliance for Jobs hailed the proposal out of the gate. Critical details must still emerge regarding the user fee and, of utmost concern to the Commission, how the new revenues would be distributed for transportation projects. Commission staff began conversations with local government advocacy associations in Sacramento such as the Self-Help Counties Coalition (SHCC), California Association of Councils " of Governments (CALCOG), the League of California Cities, and California State Association of " Counties (CSAC). All groups are similarly focused on ensuring an equitable split of revenue between the State and local governments. Staff will keep the Commission closely apprised of details of the Speaker's proposal as they emerge, or the details of any other major funding proposal that comes forward during the legislative session. State Board of Equalization Decreases State Gas Tax, Legislature Prepares Response Pursuant to 2011 legislation that altered how taxes are paid on motor fuels in California, the Board of Equalization (BOE) reduced the state's excise tax rate on gas by 6 cents per gallon. The gas tax swap eliminated the sales tax on gasoline, which was constitutionally protected from being loaned to the General Fund by Proposition 42 of 2002, and instead created a mechanism to regularly adjust the gas excise tax to generate the revenue that would have been generated by the sales tax. This revenue-neutral swap of revenue sources enabled a simple majority vote in the Legislature while freeing up transportation funds to be loaned to the General Fund to offset the staggering budget deficits the state endured earlier this decade. Due to the decreased price of oil, the amount of sales tax that would be collected on gas is dropping. This means the excise tax must be reduced to ensure revenue-neutrality of the gas tax swap. News media covered the BOE action; while the headlines have been favorably received by many in the public, the result is a steep decline in anticipated revenue available in the state's transportation accounts this fiscal year. Estimates are that transportation revenue could decline by more than $800 million annually, eating away at more than half of Speaker Atkins' new revenue proposal. The county of Riverside estimates the price-based excise gas tax " Agenda Item 11 232 " " " reduction will result in a $9.8 million loss in funding for FY 2015/16 for county road improvements. This represents a 20 percent year-over-year decline in gas tax received by the county. Cities will each see similar dropoffs in gas tax revenue for FY 2015/16. Such a dramatic swing in revenue speaks to increasing unreliability of using fuel consumption as the basis for funding transportation. The swings also inhibit project planning for local governments. In an attempt to assist governments cope with the volatility of the price-based excise tax, Senator Jim Beall (D-San Jose), Chairman of the Senate Transportation & Housing Committee, introduced SB 321. This bill allows the BOE to adjust the price-based excise tax using a five-year forecast period instead of just a one-year period, thereby reducing the impact of short term disruptions in fuel prices. SB 321 also extends the revenue-neutrality requirement to cover a three-year period instead of just one year, offering another opportunity for the BOE to smooth- out dramatic revenue swings. Finally, the bill allows the BOE to adjust the price-based excise tax every quarter, rather than once per year. Commission staff views SB 321 favorably in that it will allow local governments to better anticipate increases or decreases in gas tax revenue - and plan accordingly. However, it is important to note that SB 321 does not address the core funding shortfall that will still exist, regardless of how much "smoother" the decline in revenue becomes. Staff recommends the Commission adopt a support position on SB 321 and also add language to the Commission's legislative platform as follows: " "Support legislation that reduces the volatility of state/federal transportation revenue." State legislation Introduced The final week of February was the deadline for introducing bills in Sacramento for the new legislative session. Most of the bills introduced that week were not "in print" for public review at the time this staff report was written; however several bills were introduced earlier in the month that Commission staff would like to highlight. These bills are consistent with the Commission's adopted legislative platform, and therefore staff is moving forward with issuing letters of support: AB 4 (Linder) -For the second year in a row, Assembly Member Eric Linder (R-Corona) introduced a bill that would bring truck weight fees back to transportation accounts. AB 4 was introduced at the outset of this legislative session, although Speaker Atkins' proposal on this same issue garnered much attention in recent weeks. The Commission is encouraged by the fact that a member of the Commission's local delegation is championing the safeguarding of transportation revenue for transportation purposes, a key tenet of the Commission's platform. AB 218 (Melendez) -This bill allows for the relinquishment from state to local control of State Route 74 in the area between the cities of Lake Elsinore and Perris. This bill is sponsored by the county of Riverside and is championed by First District Supervisor and Commissioner Kevin Jeffries. AB 218 is similar to several bills signed into law in recent years that relinquish Agenda Item 11 233 portions of SR-74 in incorporated cities such as Lake Elsinore, Palm Desert, and Perris; the purpose of these bills is to allow local jurisdictions to have a greater influence on the quality of the infrastructure within their own communities. The legislation provides parameters for the relinquishment so the transaction is fair to both state and local governments. Relinquishment bills become more common across the state; the Brown Administration is planning to introduce budget trailer bill language that would provide a uniform process for relinquishment that would negate the need for legislative approval for each relinquishment. The Commission previously supports efforts to streamline this process for the Commission's local jurisdictions. AB 194 (Frazier) -This bill is nearly identical to a bill the Commission supported last year, SB 983 (Hernandez), which provides a uniform, less-political process for tolling projects to be reviewed and approved by the state. Today, each tolling project must be approved via a bill in the Legislature. AB 194 provides the California Transportation Commission (CTC) with the authority to review and approve tolling projects, subject to specified conditions that provide for public transparency and collaboration between state and regional governments. The most important aspect of this bill is it rests decision-making authority over tolling projects with the governmental entity financially responsible for the project. This was a key tenet of the Commission's policy when it sought legislation for SR-91 and Interstate 15 tolling projects. It is critical to achieving adequate credit ratings and public support that when a regional government such as the Commission is incurring hundreds of millions of dollars in debt to build a project, the agency retains financial control of the revenues. AB 194 is sponsored by the SHCC, of which the Commission is an active member. In recent days, the Brown Administration unveiled a budget trailer bill on this same issue that closely mirrors AB 194. The Commission and SHCC have been working with the Administration for more than one year on development of a statewide tolling policy and are reviewing the Administration proposal. Staff believes consensus is achievable between the state and regional stakeholders to bring a bill to the Governor's desk this year on tolling. With declining transportation revenues continuing, providing a rational process for creating new user-paid investment into the highway system would be a welcome development. Senate Transportation & Housing Committee Invites Commission Testimony Executive Director Anne Mayer was invited to testify to the Senate Transportation & Housing Committee on February 24 for an informational hearing on the state's transportation funding shortfall. Commission Second Vice Chair John Tavaglione has been invited to testify to the same committee at a hearing in Los Angeles on March 13 along with Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti. These two hearings provide an opportunity for the Commission to highlight its needs and perspectives on state funding and policy. Testimony by Ms. Mayer and Commissioner Tavaglione focus on: • • Reducing volatility of the state gas tax; Keeping faith with voters by returning all General Fund loans from transportation accounts and restoring truck weight fees to transportation accounts; Agenda Item 11 234 • • • " " " " " Making the most of existing revenue by red-tape reduction and common-sense California Environmental Quality Act modernization; Keeping all options on the table for new transportation revenue; and " Ensuring that any user revenue directly benefits users. The Commission is grateful to Chairman Jim Beall for extending these invitations to Riverside County leaders. Cap and Trade Programs Move Forward Several state agencies are under stringent timelines to solicit and receive applications for cap and trade funding programs for FY 2014/15. Commission staff held several collaborative meetings with partner government agencies, including transit operators, councils of governments, the county of Riverside, and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Agency (RCA) to discuss countywide strategies that could best-position Riverside County for receiving grants from the various cap and trade programs that are available. The county of Riverside submitted two concept applications to the Strategic Growth Council {SGC) for the Affordable Housing/Sustainable Communities (AH/SC) program ($120 million available statewide). These applications focused on pedestrian connectivity, transit access, and safety improvements in the unincorporated communities of Mecca and Mead Valley. Both projects are focused on disadvantaged communities, as identified in the state's CalEnviroScreen 2.0 tool. These projects represented the best options for meeting the criteria of the SGC in the very short timeframe given as environmental clearance and site control of the project site is required by the program guidelines. As of the time this staff report was written, all AH/SC applications in Southern California were under review by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The AH/SC guidelines require the metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) to make recommendations to the SGC on projects submitted from their respective regions before candidates are invited to submit full applications. Concurrently, the Commission worked with Sunline Transit Agency and Riverside Transit Agency to claim its formula share of Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds. Discussions are also underway to determine which projects from Riverside County will be submitted for the Transit Capital/Intercity Rail Capital competitive program. To recap, the three cap and trade programs of focus for the Commission are: " Affordable Housing/Sustainable Communities (competitive) " Transit Capital/Intercity Rail Capital (competitive) " Low Carbon Transit Operations (formula) Senator Richard D. Roth (D-Riverside) and Assembly Member Jose Medina (D-Riverside) held a special workshop at Riverside City Hall on January 30 where representatives of the state Agenda Item 11 235 agencies distributing cap and trade funds were able to speak with the public and potential applicants about the details of their programs. The workshop was well attended. Senator Roth and Assembly Member Medina emphasized the need for an equitable share of funding to come to Riverside County and the Inland Empire, especially given the current law's focus on disadvantaged communities and the many areas of Riverside County that were designated as disadvantaged. Federal Update Commission staff and Commissioner Greg Pettis (as a representative of SCAG) traveled to Washington, DC in early February to host a Congressional Member and staff breakfast jointly with SCAG and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). Five members of Congress attended, including local delegation member Representative Ken Calvert (R-Corona). Staff to Representative Mark Takano (D-Riverside) attended. Commission staff briefed staff to Representative Raul Ruiz (D-Palm Desert) and the new southwest regional manager for the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Commission staff also attended the first hearing on reauthorization of MAP-21 by the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, where Secretary Anthony Foxx provided testimony. The trip was an opportunity to demonstrate the unity of Southern California's transportation stakeholders heading into reauthorization of MAP- 21, which expires in May 2015. • In Washington, it is clear there is broad awareness of the need to pass a long-term • transportation funding and policy bill this year; however, how to pay for the bill remains the subject of debate and speculation. Much bi-partisan conversation continues to center on using one-time repatriation of offshore corporate earnings at a reduced tax rate as the means to pay for a transportation bill. Despite this chatter, the pathway to action remains clouded as repatriation would probably require a larger tax reform bill to be passed. Increasing the gas tax for the first time since 1993, received a great deal of media attention early in January as oil prices plummeted; however several recent statements by congressional leaders seemed to deflate the wind from that sail. In the meantime, Commission staff and Washington-based advocates will be spending the months of March and April revisiting MAP-21 policies and working with Congressional staff on practical policy proposals on goods movement, project delivery acceleration, and regional leadership. Staff anticipates working with other local government coalitions leading up to necessary congressional action in May. The Commission has been successful in recent years in putting forward targeted, achievable policy ideas to congressional committees that achieve local as well as national benefits; this track record is essential as the Commission advocates for greater recognition for the Commission's region in Washington. Finally, the Commission continues to closely follow a pot of funding at the FRA for corridor planning. In September 2014, the Commission submitted an application for $3 million to complete the Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor service development plan and environmental studies. A funding announcement has not yet come forth. To staff's knowledge • Agenda Item 11 236 " " " there are no other California applications for this specific pot of funding. Staff is working closely with Senator Dianne Feinstein and Representative Ruiz's office to gain insights on to the timing and result of the Commission's grant request . Agenda Item 11 237 Legislative Update Riverside County Transportation Commission March 11, 2015 • AB 4 (Linder) -Restores "'$1 billion in truck weight fees to transportation accounts. • AB 218 {Melendez) -Relinquishes portion of SR-74 to the County of Riverside. • AB 194 {Frazier) -Streamlines approval process for toll projects. • SB 321 (Beall) -Stabilizes revenue volatility when gas prices change. 3/11/2015 1 " $26 million less for local cities and the County " Equates to 25 percent cut to local gas tax budgets " Major regional projects at risk of delay: -SR-91/SR-71 Interchange -SR-60 Truck Climbing Lane (Badlands) " Statewide loss of $870 million $10 II over 5 Years i#iiii 1'1ffM.JiM $1 billion $200 million $8.00 million Early GF loan repayment User Fee(?} Questions Outstanding " What is the user fee? " How does the money get spent? (Split: Locals, Regions, State) " Backfill the General Fund? " Is it good enough? 3/11/2015 2 3/11/2015 • Revenue Proposals? {State and Fed) -State options: bonds, fees, restoring old $lost -Local measures: 2/3rds threshold, sales tax cap -Fed options: corp. tax reform • CEQA Modernization? • MAP-21 Extension likely • PEPRA/13{c) Court Case -fate of transit funds Mead Valley: Cajalco Rd Paved Shoulder and Transit Stop Improvements 3 3/11/2015 Mecca: 5th St Sidewalk Construction and Transit Stop Improvements Questions? 4 Roads are the bedrock of California's jobs and economy. Everyone — transit riders, bicyclists, pedestrians and drivers — accesses our roads and is affected when they are unsafe or congested. Our road condition is a fundamental indicator of how well California is serving Californians. If we do not address this issue, we are paving our road to ruin. WHY OUR STATE AND LOCAL ROADS ARE CRUMBLING California has more than 50,000 miles of state highways and roads and 143,000 miles of local streets and roads. The primary sources of revenue to maintain , repair and rehabilitate these roads are state and federal gasoline excise taxes . • Neither the state nor federal gas tax has been increased in more than 20 years . • Gasoline taxes are not indexed for inflation or increases in the cost of construction. • Increasing fuel efficiency has resulted in vehicles that are traveling more miles on less gas, generating fewer gas tax dollars to fix the roads. • A growing number of electric cars use the system but pay no tax. • Due to the recent decline in gasoline prices, the State Board of Equalization will initiate a 6-cent per gallon reduction in the state gas tax on July 1, 2015, slashing transportation funding by another $868 million annually. • The Legislature has borrowed or permanently taken more than $1.8 billion from state and local transportation accounts to cover budget deficits. • A voter-approved $20 billion state transportation bond in 2006 enabled the state to make one-time investments in critical projects to reduce congestion , improve goods movement and mass transit, fix unsafe roads and repave major arteries. That program has been successfully delivered. It did not address ongoing deferred maintenance and rehabilitation of thousands of miles of highways, streets and roads. • To help pay for general fund bond debt service, the Legislature in 2011 approved a complicated "gas tax swap" that took $1 billion a year in truck weight fees out of the State Highway Fund and directed the money into the State General Fund. PRICE-BASED EXCISE TAX COMPARISON 2,500 2,000 Vi c: ~ ·e 1,500 ;;;;;: c: ~ = .c ·;:: -:;; 1,000 i5 500 0 NOTE : Ooes not include $91 million in revenue associated w~h Ott-Highway use . Capacity Improvements $679 Rehab1htallon $185 local Roads $679 FY 2014-15 $2 .5 Billion Rate : 18 .0 cpg Capacity Improvements $204 FY 2015-16 $1.5 Billion Rate : 10 .5 cpg j I I DECLINING TRANSPORTATION FUNDING On-System Construction Allocations and Projected Construction Allocations Actual dollars through 2013-14 ; projected numbers going forward 8,000 1 --p;;;m;;;; ..... ;m;;;;;m;;;;;m;;;;;m;;;;;m;;;;;m;;;;;m;;;;·-----.,--- • Bo nd 7,000 ! 5,000 :E --;;; 4,000 = ~ "' ~ 3,000 cc 2,000 1,000 ~ ~ 0 • Loca l • Oth er Cap ac ity In creasi ng •SHOPP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NOTE, STIP Augmentation included in "Other Capac~y Increasing ". ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ -~ "' § ~ ~ ;::, i§ !'.l 3: :ji Fiscal Year I THE PRICE OF NEGLECT • California has the second-highest share of roads in "poor condition " in the nation . • Some 58 % of state roads need rehabilitation or pavement maintenance. • Our state has 6 of the 10 cities with the worst road conditions in the nat ion . • 55 % of local bridges require rehabilitation or replacement. • Nearly 70 % of California 's urban roads and highways are congested. • Without addit ional funding , a fourth of local streets and roads will be in failed condition by 2024 . ADDING UP THE COST • $194 billion shortfall by 2021 for preservation and rehabilitation of the current transportation system (2011 Statewide Transportation Needs Assess ment). • $5.5 billion annual shortfall estimated by Caltrans in its State Highway Operation & Protection Program (SHOPP). • $7 .8 billion annual shortfall estimated by CSAC & League of California Cities for local street , road and bridge maintenance , repair and rehabilitation. • Governor Brown has called on the Legislature to help him come up with a funding plan to address the most critical unmet needs. WHAT MUST BE DONE THIS YEAR 1. Stem the blood flow. Urgency legislation is needed to stabilize extreme fluctuations in the annual BOE adjustment of the price-based state gas excise tax. Wild swings in the annual adjustment make it impossible for state and local governments to budget for a reliable revenue stream to help cover annual maintenance and preservation of the transportation system. A new method of calculation is needed to stabilize the annual adjustment and still respond to market trends in gas prices . 2. Work with Speaker Atkins and Legislative leaders to increase transportation funding. The legislative plan outlined by the Speaker would generate $2 billion/year in additional ongoing funding through a road user charge and payback of money taken from transportation accounts . Although still a work in progress, this proposal demonstrates a solid commitment to achieve a solution. 3. Identify additional refinements in a legislative funding package. Increasing and indexing the gas tax , providing bonding capacity against a portion of the new revenue , dedicating a future portion of cap & trade funds generated at the pump to road repaving and rehab, repaying cities and counties for street and road funds held from them are just some of the tools that should be examined as part of a comprehensive transportation funding package . THE LONG-TERM SOLUTION Although it will take several years to implement , the state is beginning a journey towards a user charge that will draw upon all who use the system. The Legislature and the Administration have taken the first step through enactment of SB 1077 calling for the development and implementation of a road usage charge pilot program. ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS (AQC) Self-Help Counties Coalition Ca I ifornia Transit Association RIVERSIDE COUNTY BANNING $ BEAUMONT $ BLYTHE $ CALIMESA $ CANYON LAKE $ CATHEDRAL CITY $ COACHELLA $ CORONA $ DESERT HOT SPRINGS $ EASTVALE $ HEMET $ INDIAN WELLS $ INDIO $ JURUPA VALLEY $ LAKE ELSINORE $ LA QUINTA $ MENIFEE $ MORENO VALLEY $ MURRIETA $ NORCO $ PALM DESERT $ PALM SPRINGS $ PERRIS $ RANCHO MIRAGE $ RIVERSIDE $ SAN JACINTO $ TEMECULA $ WILDOMAR $ ALL CITIES $ County of Riverside $ TOTAL RIVERSIDE CO $ Highway Users Tax Reduction Impacts by City Riverside County Projected FY 2014-15 Revenues Projected FY 2015-16 Revenues Total Base Prop42Replace Total Total Base Prop42Replace Total 553,539 $ 314,200 $ 867,739 $ 510,246 $ 137,359 $ 647,606 742,374 $ 423,520 $ 1,165,894 $ 684,019 $ 185,151 $ 869,170 414,729 $ 234,420 $ 649,148 $ 382,429 $ 102,482 $ 484,911 154,113 $ 85,282 $ 239,396 $ 142,363 $ 37,283 $ 179,646 208,698 $ 116,303 $ 325,002 $ 192,673 $ 50,844 $ 243,518 958,016 $ 547,490 $ 1,505,507 $ 882,580 $ 239,347 $ 1,121,927 791,717 $ 452,085 $ 1,243,803 $ 729,426 $ 197,639 $ 927,065 2,862,849 $ 1,648,781 $ 4,511,629 $ 2,635,670 $ 720,800 $ 3,356,470 511,945 $ 290,121 $ 802,066 $ 471,970 $ 126,833 $ 598,803 1,071,557 $ 613,221 $ 1,684,779 $ 987,064 $ 268,083 $ 1,255,147 1,471,600 $ 844,812 $ 2,316,412 $ 1,355,197 $ 369,328 $ 1,724,525 98,864 $ 53,297 $ 152,162 $ 91,521 $ 23,300 $ 114,821 1,509,865 $ 866,964 $ 2,376,829 $ 1,390,409 $ 379,012 $ 1,769,421 2,289,670 $ 1,316,959 $ 3,606,629 $ 2,108,212 $ 575,737 $ 2,683,949 1,027,405 $ 587,660 $ 1,615,065 $ 946,433 $ 256,908 $ 1,203,342 805,820 $ 460,250 $ 1,266,070 $ 742,404 $ 201,208 $ 943,613 1,718,513 $ 987,754 $ 2,706,266 $ 1,582,414 $ 431,818 $ 2,014,232 3,581,000 $ 2,064,530 $ 5,645,530 $ 3,296,537 $ 902,554 $ 4,199,091 1,919,531 $ 1,102,679 $ 3,022,209 $ 1,767,597 $ 482,060 $ 2,249,657 500,652 $ 283,583 $ 784,235 $ 461,578 $ 123,974 $ 585,552 944,164 $ 539,471 $ 1,483,635 $ 869,832 $ 235,841 $ 1,105,674 870,591 $ 497,747 $ 1,368,338 $ 802,009 $ 217,601 $ 1,019,609 1,302,756 $ 747,066 $ 2,049,822 $ 1,199,821 $ 326,596 $ 1,526,417 326,389 $ 183,858 $ 510,247 $ 301,056 $ 80,377 $ 381,434 5,635,191 $ 3,253,734 $ 8,888,926 $ 5,186,873 $ 1,422,440 $ 6,609,313 826,259 $ 472,082 $ 1,298,341 $ 761,213 $ 206,381 $ 967,594 1,917,096 $ 1,101,270 $ 3,018,366 $ 1,765,357 $ 481,444 $ 2,246,801 709,729 $ 404,621 $ 1,114,350 $ 653,978 $ 176,889 $ 830,867 35,724,632 $ 20,493,760 $ 56,218,395 $ 32,900,881 $ 8,959,289 $ 41,860,175 31,806,381 $ 17,157,934 $ 48,964,315 $ 29,515,034 $ 7,594,808 $ 37,109,842 67,531,013 $ 37,651,694 $ 105,182,710 $ 62,415,915 $ 16,554,097 $ 78,970,017 Sources: League of California Cities, California State Association of Counties Projected Change in Revenue Dollar Amount Percentage -$220,133 -25% -$296,724 -25% -$164,237 -25% -$59,750 -25% -$81,484 -25% -$383,580 -25% -$316,738 -25% -$1,155,159 -26% -$203,263 -25% -$429,632 -26% -$591,887 -26% -$37,341 -25% -$607,408 -26% -$922,680 -26% -$411,723 -25% -$322,457 -25% -$692,034 -26% -$1,446,439 -26% -$772,552 -26% -$198,683 -25% -$377,961 -25% -$348,729 -25% -$523,405 -26% -$128,813 -25% -$2,279,613 -26% -$330,747 -25% -$771,565 -26% -$283,483 -25% -$14,358,220 -26% -$11,854,473 -24% -$26,212,693 -25% FACT: verside County has 16,835 lane miles of local roads. Why is transportation funding suddenly dropping? California's reliance on taxing fuel to fund transportation is sending the state-and Riverside County-down the wrong side of the road. Volatile oil prices and growth in efficient vehicles means steep drops in transportation revenue are the new "normal." The State Board of Equalization has reduced the state fuel excise tax by 6 cents. The Fuel Tax Swap eliminated the state sales tax on fuel and replaced it with an excise California's transportation funding is deteriorating, which means so will Riverside County's roads and bridges. Rivers ide County local governments a re facing a loss of more than $26 MILLION in a single year due t o the reduct i on of t he state 's fuel excise tax. That 's $26 m i llion (approx. 25 %) less for fixing potholes, modernizing bridges, and improving regional traffic flow at a ti me when our county's economy is rebound i ng and more demands are being placed on our roads! _ ..... ·- ..... • # . .. . .. .. . .. . : : ......... r ..... •• • •r I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I : Build 3/4ths of a Bridge? Fill 3/4ths of a Pothole? Cit i es in Riverside County will lose $14.3 million and the County will lose $11.8 million for basic maintenance and reconstruction of aging roads and bridges in FY 15/16. tax that fluc t uates annually to collect the same amount of revenue that the sales tax would have collected. Unstable gas prices means unstable transportation funding. The result? Projects delayed (along with the jobs and economic activity they create) while cities, the County of Riverside, and RCTC quickly prepare to lose one-fourth of their state funds. Drastically reduced state funds also threaten delay of regionally significant projects to the Riverside County economy, such as : French Valley Parkway Interchange www.rctc.org