Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06 June 10, 2015 CommissionRiverside County TransRortinion Commission MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, June 10, 2015 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside e'a. COMMISSIONERS eel Chair— Daryl Busch Vice Chair — Scott Matas Second Vice Chair —John F. Tavaglione COMM-COMM-00047 Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside Chuck Washington, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Deborah Franklin / Art Welch, City of Banning Brenda Knight / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Tim Wade, City of Blythe Ella Zanowic / Jim Hyatt, City of Calimesa Dawn Haggerty / Jordan Ehrenkranz, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Shelley Kaplan, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez / To Be Appointed, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Randy Fox, City of Corona Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / Clint Lorimore, City of Eastvale Linda Krupa / Paul Raver, City of Hemet Dana Reed / Douglas Hanson, City of Indian Wells Troy Strange / Glenn Miller, City of Indio Frank Johnston / Brian Berkson, City of Jurupa Valley Robert Radi / To Be Appointed, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann / To Be Appointed, City of Menifee Jesse Molina / Jeffrey J. Giba, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Jonathan Ingram, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Kathy Azevedo, City of Norco Jan Harnik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat / Paul Lewin, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Rita Rogers, City of Perris Ted Weill / To Be Appointed, City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Michael S. Naggar / Michael McCracken, City of Temecula Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar John Bulinski, Governor's Appointee Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. Riverside County Transportation Commission TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Office and Board Services Manager DATE: June 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest — Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda of June 10, 2015 The June 10, 2015 agenda of the Riverside County Transportation Commission includes items that may raise possible conflicts of interest. A Commissioner may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual listed. Aaenda Item No. 8D — Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2015/16 Consultant(s): AMMA transit Planning Heather Menninger, Principal 393 Two Trees Road Riverside, CA 92507 Best Best and Krieger LLP Steven DeBaun, Partner 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 GCAP Services Edward Salcedo, Jr., President 3525 Hyland Avenue, # 260 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Bechtel Infrastructure Corp. George Nomura, Program Manager 3850 Vine Street, Suite 210 Riverside CA 92507 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Holly Rockwell, President 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 115 Torrance, CA 90505 RJ Gorski & Associates Ray Gorski, Principal 2871 Jed Road Escondido, CA 92027 Agenda Item No. 8E — Aareement with EXIGIS, LLC for Insurance Tracking System Consultant(s): Exigis, LLC Frank J. McMackin, Partner and Director 589 8th Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10018 RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest June 3, 2015 Page 2 Agenda Item No. 8N — Agreement for On -Call Graphic Design and Communication Services Consultant(s): Geographics Lisa van Olden, Managing Partner 4178 Chestnut Street Riverside, CA 92501 Agenda Item No. 14A — Closed Session — Conference With Real Property Negotiators Item APN(s) CPN(s) Property Owner(s) 1 118-183-019 23767 Midas Realty Corp. 2 N/A 23769 D.N. Schneider 3 N/A 23880 City of Corona, John M. Brewster, Sr., et al. Agenda Item No. 148 — Closed Session — Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing Litigation Property Owner(s): Li — CPN 22228 Gregory, aka Giant RV — CPN(s) 22136, 22177, and 22135 The Parties of: Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society, Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley, and Friends of Riverside's Hills Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:29 AM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Jennifer Harmon Subject: RCTC: June Commission Agenda - 06.10.2015 Importance: High Good morning Commissioners, The June Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 10, 2015 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://www.rctc.orduploads/media items/rune-10-2015.original.pdf In addition, for your review is the attached conflict of interest memo and the form. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Conflict of Conflict of Interest Memo.pdf Interest Form.pdf Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant RCTC 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951)787-7141 1 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:36 AM To: Tara Byerly Subject: RCTC: June Commission Agenda - 06.10.2015 Importance: High Good Morning Commission Alternates: The June Commission Agenda for the meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 10, 2015 @ 9:30 a.m. is now available. http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/June-10-2015.original.pdf Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant RCTC 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951)787-7141 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, June 10, 2015 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MAY 13, 2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 10, 2015 Page 2 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 1 1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16; 3) Approve the salary schedule effective July 9, 2015, located in Appendix B of proposed budget; and 4) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16. 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS — The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR — All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 4 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2015. 8B. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 Overview Page 12 This item is for the Commission to approve Resolution No. 15-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit", for Fiscal Year 2015/16. 8C. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Page 20 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4 2014 (Q4 2014). Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 10, 2015 Page 3 8D. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 28 1) Approve the recurring contracts for Fiscal Year 2015/16; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 8E. AGREEMENT WITH EXIGIS, LLC FOR INSURANCE TRACKING SYSTEM Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 33 1) Approve Agreement No. 15-19-017-00 with EXIGIS, LLC (EXIGIS) for the use of the RiskWorks risk management operating system (RiskWorks) for insurance tracking services for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $73,815, plus a contingency amount of $7,382, for a total amount not to exceed $81,197; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services. 8F. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page 54 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 10, 2015 Page 4 8G. AGREEMENTS FOR ON -CALL RIGHT OF WAY APPRAISAL SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 102 1) Award the following agreements to provide on -call right of way appraisal services for a four-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $950,000; a) Agreement No. 15-31-056-00 with Bender Rosenthal, Inc; b) Agreement No. 15-31-097-00 with Hennessy & Hennessy, LLC; c) Agreement No. 15-31-098-00 with Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles; d) Agreement No. 15-31-099-00 with Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants; and e) Agreement No. 15-31-100-00 with Riggs & Riggs, Inc.; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to contractors under the terms of the agreements. 8H. AGREEMENTS FOR ON -CALL RIGHT OF WAY APPRAISAL REVIEW SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 130 1) Award the following agreements to provide on -call right of way appraisal review services for a four-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $500,000; a) Agreement No. 15-31-057-00 with Bender Rosenthal, Inc; b) Agreement No. 15-31-101-00 with Hennessy & Hennessy, LLC; c) Agreement No. 15-31-102-00 with Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles; d) Agreement No. 15-31-103-00 with Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants; and e) Agreement No. 15-31-104-00 with R. P. Laurain & Associates, Inc.; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to contractors under the terms of the agreements. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 10, 2015 Page 5 81. STATE ROUTE 60 TRUCK CLIMBING/DESCENDING LANE PROJECT — RIGHT OF WAY FUNDING INCREASE Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 158 1) Approve the programming of 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds in the amount of $1,497,000 for the State Route 60 truck climbing lane/descending lane project right of way (ROW) phase; 2) Approve Agreement No. 12-31-092-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 12-31-092-00, with Caltrans to revise the right of way roles and responsibilities for the State Route 60 truck climbing lane/descending lane project, including current funding commitments; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute utility agreements and future agreements with Caltrans within approved funding amounts, on behalf of the Commission. 8J. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH HDR ENGINEERING INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE PERRIS VALLEY LINE PROJECT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 187 1) Approve Agreement No. 10-31-058-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 10-31-058-00, with HDR Engineering Inc. (HDR) to provide construction management for the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project in the amount of $4.7 million, plus a contingency amount of $500,000, for an additional amount of $5.2 million, and a total amount not to exceed $22,750,146; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee, pursuant to legal counsel review, to approve the use of the contingency as may be required for the project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 10, 2015 Page 6 8K. FISCAL YEARS 2015/16 — 2017/18 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Page 243 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 2015/16 — 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. 8L. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR THE CITY OF BANNING'S MUNICIPAL TRANSIT SYSTEM Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 248 1) Allocate additional operating funds of $132,094 in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds to the city of Banning's Municipal Transit System (Banning Transit); and 2) Amend Banning Transit's FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the additional operating funds. 8M. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE INTERSTATE 215 CENTRAL WIDENING PROJECT FROM SCOTT ROAD TO NUEVO ROAD IN THE CITY OF PERRIS Page 250 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 12-31-034-05, Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 12-31-034-00 with Jacobs Project Management Co. (Jacobs) to provide construction management services for required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out for the Interstate 215 Central widening project in the amount of $276,857, plus a contingency amount of $27,643, for an additional amount of $304,500, and a total amount not to exceed $13,304,500; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 10, 2015 Page 7 8N. AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL GRAPHIC DESIGN AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES Page 266 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 15-15-065-00 to Geographics for the provision of graphic design and communications services on an as -needed, time and expense basis, pursuant to its proposed fixed unit rates, for a two-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in amount of $2,940,000, plus a contingency amount of $400,000, for a total amount not to exceed $3,340,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services. 9. FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2015/16 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program recommended funding of $2,752,015. 10. PROPOSED METROLINK BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 287 Page 292 1) Adopt the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget; and 2) Receive and file a report on the Commission's portion of the FY 2015/16 SCRRA operating and capital budget. 11. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt the following bill position — SB 39 (Pavley) — Oppose. Page 296 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 10, 2015 Page 8 12. BRIDGE LOAN FROM THE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the disbursement of $3 million in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds to the SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) as a bridge loan due to the United States Department of Labor suspension of federal Section 5307 funds. 13. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 14. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. 15. CLOSED SESSION 15A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Property Owner(s): See Below Item APN(s) CPN(s) Property Owner(s) 1 118-183-019 23767 Midas Realty Corp. 2 N/A 23769 D.N. Schneider 3 N/A 23880 City of Corona, John M. Brewster, Sr., et al. 15B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Case No(s). RIC 1311348, RIC 1311600, and RIC 1505449 16. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 8, 2015, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL JUNE 10, 2015 County of Riverside, District I County of Riverside, District II County of Riverside, District III County of Riverside, District IV County of Riverside, District V City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Eastvale City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of Jurupa Valley City of La Qu i nta City of Lake Elsinore City of Menifee City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula City of Wildomar Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 Absent O O O O O O O O 0 O O O /O O /16 O O O RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONER SIGN -IN SHEET JUNE 10, 2015 NAME AGENCY EMAIL ADDRESS �l) � �?�� L L, r�i�t'y2. K t,t-.may �- �.. I �) q---o YI / fie t elnd 4 tot' \--• (') e 6i LI m cm t Rae 1/24-1,Z7, 1.r k i .fix ` f A. ,' ;! X 41- / b '-7'*' C-L. t> \.A.A.P.-Vt,-\ ,ititiv---c(lak,, Uatax l27,7-i►/ , j,,, r k, - G�2i /*A- K, c -f� iy v A R.,l 1, 2- K/GC�-,A 2.4-M,, / c. - fr'S A- /W % j�/''/I--; �. �ea'Q t 7 k-c-eac?----- V-- -P---{ r-/A 1 e,A- cl,J 1-A- f r"L J. G 7 ��� < ij2;f� 0/ &(!- ��� 1,}1 t ',,t / - % 1/r<% ofc,' 6-6-A-t\I QQtd 6,l ,--p4N%r7(k r D6 y�j / 1� 14e_A---S-4.3f -r`, 7� zip Ik'l AS le, `v #4 ft- N4.6”° k W- cl y ()% 4,, V k, ti , :. 1 9��, � 11%t/iv //� ��/(/ /. G,,,e GVei :�r4 �!"( r U � cz ji JAN 4 1--t i N I V— �_`\( ���c� I -Da�0.-�ee jLI`�'( ..._A;vC�; I+0 Wells 1:), &��/}pv 6 JvZ), l 0 ; ut I ACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: 416 16' CHECK IF SUBJECT OF � %-� / PUBLIC COMMENTS: al PUBLIC � L PUBLIC COMMENTS: � AGENDA ITEM NO.: SUBJECT OF (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) NAME: ADDRESS: AGENDA fTEM: M, gin N IA-att6 laRzo_w_ REPRESENTING: 5G IA -"to 2, a""C' Sto G NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP BUSINESS ADDRESS: Walk 61-14- STREET PHONE NO.: qg CITY PHONE NO.: ZiP CODE CITY ZIP CODE AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Daryl Busch at 9:32 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Executive Director Anne Mayer led the Commission in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Steve Adams* Shelly Kaplan Marion Ashley Brenda Knight Ben Benoit Linda Krupa John J. Benoit Clint Lorimore John Bulinski Bob Magee Daryl Busch Scott Mann Joseph DeConinck Scott Matas Ginny Foat Jesse Molina Randy Fox Michael Naggar Deborah Franklin Robert Radi Rick Gibbs Dana Reed Dawn Haggerty Troy Strange Berwin Hanna John F. Tavaglione Jan Harnik Ted Weill Steven Hernandez Chuck Washington Kevin Jeffries* Ella Zanowic Frank Johnston Andrew Kotyuk *Arrived after the meeting was called to order 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Anne Mayer introduced and welcomed Caltrans District 8 Interim Director John Bulinski. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — APRIL 8, 2015 M/S/C (Mann/Ashley) to approve the April 8, 2015 minutes as submitted. Abstain: Hanna At this time, Commissioners Steve Adams and Kevin Jeffries joined the meeting. 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller, presented the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16 and discussed the following areas: • Budget process; • FY 2015/16 Budget considerations and summary; • Sources and expenditure by breakdown and comparison; • Capital department expenditure highlights; • Functional expenditures breakdown and comparison; and • Next steps. In response to Commissioner Ginny Foat's request for clarification about the ongoing issues with the Federal Highway Trust fund, Anne Mayer replied the transportation bill expires at the end of May 2015. If Congress authorizes a continuing resolution, it will only be for a couple of months, which causes a significant amount of disruption for federally -funded projects. If federal funds were cut off, the Commission could weather the lack of funding for a few months, however, it would begin to have serious impacts on the active construction projects. Staff is monitoring this issue very closely and stated the Congressional delegation is very informed on the topic and is monitoring it as well. Commissioner Jeffries referred to the legislative affairs and communications budget for FY 2015/16 in the attached Executive Summary and asked what caused the significant increase. Michele Cisneros explained within that category, there is communications with the majority for graphic and marketing communications related to the Perris Valley Line project. In response to Commissioner Jeffries question regarding oversight and Commission approval for expenditures, Anne Mayer explained this budget line item is for legislative affairs and communications. The allocations for this work are in this department's budget and the Legislative Affairs Program is managed by Government Relations Manager Aaron Hake, in conjunction with Deputy Executive Director John Standiford, and herself. From a communications standpoint, it is spread over multiple functions and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 3 a significant amount of communications are done as part of the overall management of the Commission. Anne Mayer explained expenditures are approved by the Commission as a part of an on -call contract, a dedicated contract, or part of an approved project. Additionally, she approves work under her single signature authority. Commissioner Jeffries then questioned why expenditures for a project are not under that project's budget. Anne Mayer explained that while most of the project -related expenditures are budgeted under a specific project, there is an overarching Commission responsibility for general communications that require staff to provide community updates at events such as municipal advisory committees and town hall meetings. M/S/C to continue the public hearing for the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16 to the Commission meeting on June 10, 2015. 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS Anne Mayer announced correspondence was received after close of business day on May 12 from Gresham Savage Nolan and Tilden, PC, (Gresham Savage) representing Inland Transportation Services (ITS) related to Agenda Item No. 12, "Amendment with Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc. for Commuter Assistance Program Administration Services", and it was distributed to the Commissioners at the dais. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Foat stated she will vote no on Agenda Item 81, "State Legislation". Commissioner Jeffries requested Agenda Item 81, "State Legislation", be pulled for further discussion. M/S/C (Jeffries/Ashley) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. 8A. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2015. 8B. COMMUTER RAIL RESOLUTIONS TO OBTAIN FEDERAL AND STATE GRANT FUNDING 1) Adopt Resolution No. 15-009, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Approve the Submittal of a Project for the Fiscal Year 2014/15 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program"; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 4 2) Adopt Resolution No. 15-010, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Authorize the Filing of Applications with the Federal Transit Administration for Federal Transportation Assistance Grants under Sections 5307, 5309, and 5337 and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality for Fiscal Year 2014/15"; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 15-011, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Authorize the Filing of Applications with the Federal Transit Administration for Federal Transportation Assistance Grants under Sections 5307, 5309, and 5337 and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality for Fiscal Year 2015/16"; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to submit or file requests for state and federal grant funding of operating and/or capital costs related to rail projects. 8C. REQUEST FOR FEDERAL OPERATING ASSISTANCE FUNDING FOR START-UP OF PERRIS VALLEY LINE Approve programming $20 million of federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds for operating assistance for the start-up of the Perris Valley Line. 8D. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN STATION OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER 1) Approve an increase in the contingency for Agreement No. 14-31-149-00 with M.S. Construction Management Group for additional construction services for the Riverside Downtown Station Operations Control Center (RDNOCC) project in the amount of $250,000, plus a contingency amount of $403,389, for a total amount not to exceed $1,937,280; 2) Approve Agreement No. 14-31-075-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14-31-075-00, with Abacus Project Management, Inc. (Abacus) to increase the contingency for anticipated additional construction management (CM), materials testing, and construction surveying services for the RDNOCC, in the amount of $50,000, plus a contingency amount of $66,586, for a total amount not to exceed $232,448; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work as may be required for the project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 5 8E. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, SEMILLA LANDSCAPE, MORNING STAR SWEEPING, GLOBAL PEST SOLUTIONS AND UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES FOR THE THREE NEW PERRIS VALLEY LINE STATIONS AND THE EXPANSION OF THE PERRIS TRANSIT CENTER TO THE PERRIS DOWNTOWN STATION 1) Approve Agreement No. 11-24-145-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 11-24-145-00, with Tropical Plaza Nursery for maintenance services in the amount of $101,754, plus a contingency amount of $10,175, for an additional amount of $111,929, and $500,000 for drought tolerant landscaping rehabilitation, resulting in a total amount not to exceed $1,622,378; 2) Approve Agreement No. 12-24-086-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 12-24-086-00, with Semilla Landscape in the amount of $102,060, plus a contingency amount of $10,206, for an additional amount of $112,266, and a total amount not to exceed $616,377; 3) Approve Agreement No. 14-24-158-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14-24-158-00, with Morning Star Sweeping in the amount of $37,080, plus a contingency amount of $3,708, for an additional amount of $40,788, and a total amount not to exceed $100,788; 4) Approve Agreement No. 11-24-046-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 11-24-046-00, with Global Pest Solutions in the amount of $4,380, plus a contingency amount of $2,000, for an additional amount of $6,380, and a total amount not to exceed $21,380; 5) Approve Agreement No. 11-24-057-04, Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 11-24-057-00, with Universal Protection Services in the amount of $1,060,723, plus a contingency amount of $106,072, for an additional amount of $1,166,795, and a total amount not to exceed $7,070,895; 6) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the amendments to the agreements, on behalf of the Commission; 7) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded under the terms of the agreements; and 8) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 6 8F. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH FIBERTRONICS FOR CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND STATION MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1) Approve Agreement No. 13-24-066-01, Amendment No. 1, to Agreement No. 13-24-066-00 with Fibertronics, Inc. (Fibertronics) for commuter rail station Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) security system installation, maintenance, and repair services at the three new Perris Valley Line stations, and capital improvements at the six existing commuter rail stations, in the amount of $79,200 for CCTV maintenance, $67,500 for repairs, and $500,000 for capital improvements, plus a contingency amount of $32,335, for an additional amount of $679,035, and a total amount not to exceed $1,293,605; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the amendment to the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded under the terms of the agreement; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project. 8G. AGREEMENTS FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK SERVICE 1) Award Agreement No. 15-45-060-00 to Airport Mobil Towing (Airport Mobil) for Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) tow truck services on Interstate 15 Beat No. 25 for a three-year term, plus two one-year options to extend the agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $1,927,000; and 2) Award Agreement No. 15-45-061-00 to Pepe's Towing (Pepe's) for FSP tow truck services on 1-15 Beat No. 26 for a three-year term, plus two one-year options to extend the agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $1,291,000. 8H. FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE BUSPOOL SUBSIDY FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUESTS 1) Authorize payment of $1,645/month maximum subsidy per buspool for FY 2015/16, to the existing Mira Loma, Riverside, and Riverside II buspools; and 2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 7 9. REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS RELATED TO STATE ROUTE 91 HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANE PROJECT Patti Castillo, Capital Projects Manager, provided a brief overview for reprogramming of funds for the SR-91 high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane project. Ms. Castillo introduced Caltrans District 8 Deputy District Director Mike Beauchamp to present the SR-91 HOV lane project status. Mr. Beauchamp updated the Commission on the SR-91 HOV lane project, highlighting the following areas: • Project status, recent activities, current activities, and project challenges; and • Wrap up — construction and schedule. Commissioner Steve Adams expressed his support for the project. In response to Commissioner John Tavaglione's request for additional information regarding project challenges and the status of the Arlington Avenue/Indiana Avenue on ramp, Mr. Beauchamp explained part of the issue is matching existing grades. He stated Caltrans is working on a temporary restriping plan to open that ramp in the next couple weeks. Commissioner Tavaglione offered the Commission's assistance if the plan cannot be completed in the time currently anticipated. He then expressed his understanding of the challenges and his appreciation and support for the project. Anne Mayer stated Caltrans and the Commission discussed ways to open some of the interchanges sooner, which will require additional funds. M/S/C (Adams/Harnik) to: 1) Approve reprogramming federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds in the amount of $6,197,000 and 1989 Measure A Western County highway local match in the amount of $802,900 from the State Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle (SR-91 HOV) project right of way phase to the construction phase; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute agreements with Caltrans to reflect the reprogramming of $6,197,000 CMAQ funds and $802,900 Measure A funds from right of way to construction for the SR-91 HOV. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 8 10. AGREEMENT WITH HDR ENGINEERING, INC. FOR STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager, presented the scope of the strategic assessment, highlighting the following areas: • Looking forward and looking back; • Commission strategic choices for next 10 — 20 years; • Assessment, strategic considerations, strategies, and applications; and • Procurement and next steps. At this time, Commissioner Ben Benoit left the meeting. Commissioner Bob Magee expressed appreciation for bringing this proposal forward. He discussed his strong concerns regarding the projects once planned to provide traffic relief to Interstate 15 including the 1-15 Corridor Improvement project, the Temescal Canyon Road bypass project, the Irvine -Corona Expressway project, and the Ortega Highway expansion project. He stated the only project still being planned for, the 1-15 Express Lanes project (formerly the 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project), was rescoped and will now stop at Cajalco Road, leaving a 10-mile gap. He stated it is unacceptable not to have a plan to address the projected growth along this corridor, south of SR-91. He requested the Chair reactive the 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project Ad Hoc Committee or select another committee to create a plan and work with the local jurisdictions along the 1-15 corridor. He expressed the Commission must report to its constituents there is plan, a target, and a goal. Anne Mayer expressed support for Commissioner Magee's suggestion and confirmed staff will follow up. Commissioner Marion Ashley concurred with Commissioner Magee's comments. He then suggested the Commission work with the county to accelerate the Cajalco Road project as he believes it is a viable project. Anne Mayer expressed support for Commissioner Ashley's suggestion. Commissioner Ashley then added the Commission is working closely with the county on the Ethanac Road/SR-74/Nichols Road Corridor project. If these two projects are completed, it would help relieve the traffic congestion Commissioner Magee is concerned about. Anne Mayer explained there is a significant amount of work to be completed through the strategic assessment by January 2016. She stated a clear understanding of the Commissioners' comments and concerns. There may need to be policy guidance provided as this strategic assessment is formulated. She explained an ad hoc committee can be formed or reinstated. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 9 Commissioner Chuck Washington requested an ad hoc committee be formed regarding major infrastructure leading into the San Jacinto Valley. He expressed he would like to eliminate the perception of the valley as a cul-de-sac. Commissioner Scott Mann expressed his support for Commissioners Magee and Washington's suggestions regarding ad hoc committees. M/S/C (Mann/Washington) to: 1) Award Agreement No. 15-65-051-00 to HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) for the development of a strategic assessment for a nine -month period in the amount of $600,000, plus a contingency amount of $60,000, for a total amount not to exceed $660,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services. 11. PRINCIPLES FOR STATE TRANSPORTATION REVENUE Aaron Hake presented the proposed guiding principles for state transportation revenue, highlighting the following areas: • Restore funds for transportation projects; • Regional share, decision -making, and equity; • Geographic equity for state funds; • User -pay = user -benefit; • Reduce the costs of delivery; • Fund trade corridors. At this time, Commissioner Ben Benoit rejoined the meeting. In response to Commissioner Foat's request for clarification about the loss of gas tax revenue, Aaron Hake replied earlier this year the State Board of Equalization (SBOE) reduced the gas tax by six cents, resulting in a $26 million loss of revenue for maintenance of roads. He explained the proposal Senator Jim Beall authored, SB 16, will provide approximately $34 million in funding back to that same source for the local jurisdictions. At Commissioner Foat's request, Aaron Hake discussed the status of SB 16. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 10 Commissioner Jeffries expressed support for the guiding principles, however, he will abstain on this item as it will be used to support the significant tax increases proposed under SB 16. He expressed his distrust of the state Legislature and cited his reasons. He also expressed he does not believe taxpayers should pay additional taxes, specifically when the state projected a $4 billion surplus, which local jurisdictions will not receive any funding from. Commissioner Ashley noted SB 16 is not a tax, it is a fee, which the Riverside County Board of Supervisors supported by a 3-2 vote. Anne Mayer explained the reason the principles were brought forward for adoption instead of taking specific positions on these bills is some of these bills may change and staff did not want to prematurely take a position. Staff can state the Commission has not taken a position, however, the following principles were adopted and every bill will be measured against the adopted principles. Commissioner John Benoit reiterated SB 16 is a user fee and as a nation, everyone must realize road maintenance must be addressed through all users, not gasoline. He expressed support for the proposed principles and SB 16 as this issue must be addressed. Commissioner Washington expressed his support for the executive director's comments, Commissioner Benoit's comments, and the staff recommendation. In response to Commissioner Jesse Molina's question regarding how is the principles relate to the loss of potential funding to the SR-60 truck climbing/descending lane project, Aaron Hake replied the principles relate to the loss in gas tax revenue this year, which is based on low gas prices last year. He explained the SBOE reduced the allocation based on revenue, therefore reducing the amount of funding in the State Highway Account, which could be a revenue source for large regional projects such as the SR-60 project. The proposal in SB 16 includes two cents for goods movement trade corridors, which SR-60 could arguably qualify for, in turn raising the likelihood projects on the table will keep moving forward. Commissioner Jan Harnik concurred with the Commissioners and executive director's comments and expressed concern as to how to maintain the roads when so much is being done to create more efficient transportation that does not pay for infrastructure. Commissioner Clint Lorimore expressed concern SB 16 will disproportionally impact the Inland Empire as it is a commuter area that travels into Los Angeles and Orange Counties for jobs. Additionally, he believes it disincentivizes the purchase of electric vehicles. He stated while he agrees the Inland Empire needs more funding, he does not support SB 16. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 11 M/S/C (Reed/Foat) to: 1) Provide direction to staff on strategies for approaching state transportation revenue legislation; and 2) Adopt principles for state transportation revenue legislation. Abstain: Haggerty, Jeffries, and Naggar No: Lorimore 12. AGREEMENT WITH PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC. FOR COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION SERVICES John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director, stated a letter was submitted by Gresham Savage on behalf of Inland Transportation Services (ITS) opposing the award of the Commuter Assistance Program (CAP) agreement, which arrived after the close of business yesterday. The letter was distributed to the Commissioners at the dais. He discussed the CAP history and performance, including the need to evolve this program. He then discussed the procurement, bid protest by ITS, and protest committee finding of no bias, as well as responded to the allegations in the Gresham Savage letter. Bill McCaughey, ITS, stated ITS is a small business owner since 1989, and provided services to the Commission and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) for over 24 years, including 13 industry awards. He expressed strong concern ITS was put in an awkward position and disagrees with the Commission and its findings of no bias. He stated there are well documented corrupt actions and unethical behavior on the part of an individual on the evaluation committee. ITS raised this concern with Commission staff and asked the Commission to not put this individual on the committee. He suggested the Commission contact SANBAG, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro), Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and South Coast Air Quality Management District staffs as his reputation and ITS' reputation are being impugned. Mr. McCaughey offered to meet with the Commission's management staff and legal counsel to resolve this matter before ITS exercises its options for remedy should the Commission take action to approve the contract with PB. He stated ITS will file a protest seven days after action is taken per the Commission's policy and procedures. He stated if the current protest finding is upheld, ITS will make a federal protest as SANBAG's funds are 50 percent Federal Transit Administration funds. Commissioner Tavaglione stated the Commission officers were briefed on this matter and expressed concern for claims of corruption. He stated it is important as a Commission to ensure those claims are properly investigated and requested the executive director, a few Commissioners, and legal counsel review Mr. McCaughey's claims. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 12 Commissioner Steve Adams concurred with Commissioner Tavaglione's comments and stated in the interest of transparency and fairness, the Commission needs to look at this matter to ensure there was no inappropriate conduct. Commissioner Jeffries concurred with Commissioners Adams and Tavaglione's comments. Commissioner Reed explained there is an appeals process that is well set out and has been honed over the years on the state and federal levels. He suggested letting the process play out, let Mr. McCaughey appeal it, and if there is a problem the Commissioners will be notified. Anne Mayer explained staff will do what the Commission directs. She stated she has no concerns about other individuals evaluating the process that was followed and the decision she made. She stated these allegations were taken very seriously and the Commission's program rests completely on its credibility, integrity, and transparency. The Commission adopted procurement policies and procedures, including a protest procedure, which were carefully considered. She suggested the Chair create an ad hoc committee to review the decisions made if the Commission believes it is necessary. Additionally, she kept SANBAG apprised of the circumstances and details, stating if SANBAG Executive Director Raymond Wolfe were present today, he would support the award of this contract to PB. She explained LA Metro, OCTA, and VCTC have a separate program, noting the LA Metro Board asked staff to look at its CAP to determine whether it should be brought in house instead of approving a contract to continue an existing program. She assured the Commission she spent a great deal of time evaluating this matter and will follow through with Commission direction. At Commissioner J. Benoit's request for assurance, Anne Mayer confirmed she is aware of the individual's name, the circumstances described were investigated, she is comfortable with the protest committee's findings, and supports moving forward with the award. At Commissioner Washington's request for clarification regarding Commissioner Tavaglione's suggestion, Commissioner Tavaglione stated Mr. McCaughey seemed to be making allegations against an individual within an organization, however, it was not clear which organization. Commissioner Tavaglione stated after Ms. Mayer's comments, it appears it was an individual from the Commission. Anne Mayer concurred. Commissioner Tavaglione then clarified he is confident in Ms. Mayer's leadership and the staff in this organization. He concurred with Commissioner Reed's comments and expressed his support for the staff recommendation. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 13 M/S/C (Tavaglione/Reed) to: 1) Award Agreement No. 15-41-038-00 to Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. (PB) for Commuter Assistance Program (CAP) administration services for a two-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement in the amount of $8,058,460, plus a contingency amount of $402,929, for a total amount not to exceed $8,461,389; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Abstain: Magee and Molina No: Haggerty, Jeffries, Naggar, and Strange 13. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION 81. STATE LEGISLATION Commissioner Foat explained she works with the homeless community and supports SB 608. In response to Commissioner Foat's request for clarification regarding the Commission's previous positions on similar bills, Aaron Hake stated there was a similar bill a few years ago that the Commission opposed and the Commission's position would be the same with this measure as well. He explained it is very restrictive on the Commission's ability to maintain public safety at its commuter rail stations. At this time, Commissioners J. Benoit and Brenda Knight left the meeting. Commissioner Jeffries suggested SB 516 is well intended, however, it could be improved. M/S/C (Jeffries/Washington) to adopt the following positions on state legislation: 1) SB 608 (Liu) — Oppose; and 2) SB 516 (Fuller) — Support In Concept. No: Foat and Haggerty 14. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 14A. Anne Mayer announced there were two brochures distributed at the dais: An update regarding a public information meeting held at the Corona Public Library Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 13, 2015 Page 14 regarding the SR-91 Project on May 14; A ribbon cutting ceremony will be held on May 27th for the 1-215 Bi-County project. At this time, Commissioners Ashley, Gibbs, Jeffries, Molina, Tavaglione, and Caltrans District 8 Representative John Bulinski left the meeting. 15. CLOSED SESSION 15A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(4) Potential Number of Case(s): 1 15B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Case No(s). RIC 1311384, RIC 1312687, RIC 1313618, and the Parties of Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society, Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley, and Friends of Riverside's Hills The Commission authorized legal counsel to defend the Commission in the case involving of the Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society, Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley, and Friends of Riverside's Hills. Commissioners Michael Naggar and Washington recused themselves from the discussion of this case. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Busch adjourned the meeting at 11:36 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, June 10, 2015, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Respectfully submitted, Ox'-'"--&-- H Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board AGENDA ITEM 6 PUBLIC HEARING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2015/16 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16; 3) Approve the salary schedule effective July 9, 2015 located in Appendix B of proposed budget; and 4) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The annual fiscal budget is the result of staff determining the operating and capital needs for FY 2015/16 and identifying the resources to fund those needs. The budget process began in January 2015. The goals and objectives approved by the Commission on March 11 were the basis of this budget. The goals and objectives considered during the preparation of the budget relate to mobility initiatives, goods movement, improved system efficiencies, environmental stewardship, economic development, intermodalism and accessibility, and public and agency communications, and financial and administrative policies. On May 13, staff presented the proposed budget to the Commission. Subsequent to that presentation, staff updated the document as a result of the following changes resulting in a net decrease of $13,676,100 to the projected fund balance at June 30, 2016 Adjustments to Fiscal Year 2014/15 Projected Amounts • An increase in state reimbursements of $565,000 and an increase in construction expenditures of $565,000 for Interstate 215 Central project; and a net decrease in State Transit Assistance (STA) and Local Transportation Fund (LTF) expenditures of $3,584,000 based on review and analysis of Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) submissions. Agenda Item 6 1 Adjustments to Fiscal Year 2015/16 Budgeted Amounts • An increase in state reimbursements of $50,000 and an increase in construction expenditures of $50,000 for 1-215 Central project; • A $100,000 increase in right of way expenditures for the State Route 74 realignment project; • A net increase of $5,941,500 in STA expenditures based on review and analysis of SRTP submissions; • An increase of $11,184,600 in LTF expenditures based on review and analysis of SRTP submissions; • A net decrease of $4,899,400 in operating transfers related to rail maintenance and operations LTF allocations based on review and analysis of SRTP submission; and • A $34,000 decrease in investment income as a result of a net increase in STA and LTF expenditures. A public hearing to allow for public comment on the proposed budget, as revised, is required prior to the adoption of the proposed budget. The public hearing was opened at its May 13 Commission meeting. After the public hearing is closed on June 10, adoption of the proposed budget for FY 2015/16 will follow. In accordance with the Commission's fiscal policies, the budget must be adopted no later than June 15 of each year. The proposed Budget for FY 2015/16 is attached. This document contains the executive summary, as revised, that was presented at the May 13 Commission meeting; the Gann Appropriations Limit; the guiding policies related to the preparation of the budget; a summary of the budget process; fund budgets, details of program revenues and other sources; debt; department budgets; a community profile; and appendices including a glossary of acronyms, salary schedule effective July 9, 2015, funding definitions, and program/general terms. A summary of the proposed Budget for FY 2015/16 is as follows: Agenda Item 6 2 FY 2015/16 Budget Revenues and other financing sources: Sales taxes -Measure A, LTF, and STA $ 266,372,400 Reimbursements (federal, state, and other) 100,896,000 TUMF 12,053,800 Other revenues 235,000 Interest on investments 2,456,300 Debt proceeds 261,277,900 Transfers in 136,077,400 Total revenues and other financing sources 779,368,800 Expenditures and other financing uses: Personnel salary and fringe benefits 9,499,800 Professional services 16,301,000 Support services 7,005,200 Projects and operations 812,385,900 Capital outlay 3,793,500 Debt service (principal, interest and costs of issuance) 53,919,900 Transfers out 136,077,400 Total expenditures and other financing uses 1,038,982,700 Excess of expenditures and other financing uses over revenues (259,613,900) and other financing sources Beginning fund balance 831,809,600 Ending fund balance $ 572,195,700 Attachment: FY 2015/16 Proposed Budget — Posted on Commission Website Agenda Item 6 3 Riverside County Transportation Commission FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 June 10, 2015 Honorable Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California FY 2015/16 Budget Introduction A County on the Move — Many Projects Nearing Completion — While Others Move Ahead Thank you for reviewing the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 budget for the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission or RCTC). This document provides an opportunity to evaluate the financial backbone of an innovative and active public transportation agency. The upcoming fiscal year continues a concerted effort of unprecedented investment and construction in Riverside County's (County) transportation infrastructure. The results of the investment are becoming more obvious as a number of high -profile projects will wrap up construction during 2015 and early 2016. The completion of the projects will assure better mobility and provide a positive and ongoing boost for local businesses and employers. Projects to be Completed by FY 2015/16 In terms of high -profile project completion, work on the Interstate (1)-215 is especially noteworthy. Construction of a bi-county effort to add high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes to the northern portion of the 1-215 in Riverside through a portion of southern San Bernardino County culminated in May 2015. The project was led by San Bernardino Associated Governments, but the Riverside County portion of the project between the 60/91/215 interchange and the San Bernardino County line was funded by the Commission and improves connectivity between the two counties. In downtown Riverside, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) continues work on the State Route (SR) 91 HOV lane project which will dramatically improve mobility and circulation throughout areas of the city near the freeway. The six -mile project is expected to open to traffic in late 2015 or early 2016. Farther south in the city of Perris, the completion of the widening of a 12.5-mile segment of the 1-215 between Scott and Nuevo Roads is imminent with a ribbon cutting slated for July 2015. The completion of the project will also ease access into the city, which is home to the Commission's largest public transit project. The Perris Valley Line (PVL) Metrolink Extension project represents the first expansion of the five -county Metrolink train system since the mid-1990's. For Riverside County, the PVL expands and revitalizes public transit service by establishing a transit backbone for Western Riverside County that includes more trains, enhanced bus service, new commuter options, and an allure for new employers to locate to Riverside County. This major construction effort to extend Metrolink another 24 miles into Riverside County wraps up in December 2015 with new service to new stations in South Perris, Downtown Perris, March Air Base/Moreno Valley, and Hunter Park in Riverside. In addition to funding new service, the Commission is also investing in improved rail infrastructure by funding a number of railroad grade separations, many of which will be completed during the upcoming fiscal year. In May, the city of Riverside completed construction on the Streeter Avenue grade separation which was funded through a combination of funding sources including state bond funding allocated by the Commission. Another city of Riverside grade separation project at Riverside Avenue is expected to be completed in late 2015. Three additional grade separation projects will open over the next few months at Sunset Avenue in the city of Banning and at Avenue 52 and Avenue 56 in the city of Coachella. Projects Moving Forward 91 Project in Corona: Full Speed Ahead In December 2013, the Commission broke ground on a $1.4 billion project to widen SR-91 through Corona. The project consists of two tolled express lanes and the addition of a general purpose lane in each direction of SR-91 between the Orange County line and 1-15. The work will create 16,000 new jobs and is the largest ever funded by the Commission. An example of its size and scope is in the number of bridges to be built as part of the project. A total of 32 new bridges are to be constructed and work has begun on almost half with a major connector between the eastbound SR-91 and southbound 1-15 already complete and open to traffic. The eventual completion of the project will culminate in a transformation of Riverside County's transportation system with reduced congestion, toll lane options, and enhanced transit service. The overall economic effect for the County will be significant and will aid economic development opportunities throughout the region. 1-10 Jefferson Interchange in Indio Breaks Ground Over the last few years, the Coachella Valley Association of Government (CVAG), a key RCTC partner, has completed construction on a number of key interchanges along 1-10. Construction has been completed on rebuilt and expanded freeway interchanges at Palm Drive, Indian Canyon Drive, Bob Hope Drive, Date Palm Avenue, and Monterey Avenue. The attention now shifts slightly eastward to another 1-10 interchange at Jefferson Avenue in the city of Indio. The $42.3 million project to transform the interchange which connects the Coachella Valley's largest city to the freeway broke ground in early 2015 and is expected to be completed in early 2017. The project is being funded through a variety of state and local funding. Looking Forward to an Exciting Future Commission Approves Mid County Parkway Environmental Document On April 8, 2015, the Commission approved the California Environmental Quality Act portion of the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Summary (EIS) for the proposed Mid County Parkway (MCP) project. Commission staff has submitted the final EIR/EIS to the Federal Highway Administration for approval of the National Environmental Policy Act EIS portion and anticipates completing the environmental phase of studies by the end of 2015. When completed, the $1.7 billion MCP project will construct a 14.3-mile, six -lane freeway from 1-215 in the city of Perris to SR-79 in the city of San Jacinto. The project will also provide more convenient access to multimodal bus and rail facilities in the city of Perris, including the new PVL extension of Metrolink service. With the environmental document approved, design and engineering work will begin followed by property acquisition. Yet another new corridor is also undergoing environmental studies. The SR-79 realignment project continues to progress and Commission action to approve the EIR is expected in 2017. Unlike much of urbanized California, Riverside County still has a need to develop new transportation corridors to provide added capacity for cars, trucks, public transit and active transportation uses such as bicycling and walking. Developing new capacity can be done in a manner that is complementary in maintaining the environment and in improving the quality of life for local residents. Transportation interacts with a variety of human needs including better air quality, a reduction in water runoff, reducing the creation of greenhouse gases, and transportation alternatives that promote better health through walking or bicycling. By taking a more holistic approach, the importance of transportation actually grows larger and is valued as a vital necessity, but that can only happen as long as capacity continues to grow. Is Enhanced Coachella Valley Rail Service in our Future? Added capacity includes more rail service in underserved corridors. RCTC, in coordination with Ca!trans, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and CVAG, is studying the expansion of Amtrak passenger rail service to the Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass. The service is envisioned to provide an integrated, sustainable travel mode; promote economic opportunities; and foster more livable communities. Currently, there are very limited transit connections between Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley. This service would provide new travel options between job centers and Coachella Valley tourism destinations. The study took a big step forward in mid-2015 with the approval of a $2.98 million grant from the FRA which fully funds the Commission's efforts to complete a federally -required Alternatives Analysis and Preliminary Service Planning. While a number of steps are still required before the service can be added, the project offers an exciting opportunity to offer a new transportation option for those seeking to travel to and from the Coachella Valley from anywhere in southern California. People Working — Building a Better Future The Commission and its project partners at Caltrans, local jurisdictions, and transit agencies are investing in transportation using a variety of local, state, and federal sources to build projects, plan and design new improvements, and get people working and contributing to the local economy. During FY 2015/16, the Commission will invest $680 million in capital projects that include highway, regional arterial, local street and road, and rail projects. The Commission's overall budget will exceed $900 million and includes funding of transit operations, payments to cities and the County for street and road improvements, and management of smaller programs such as motorist and commuter assistance. The Commission's status has become somewhat unique in Southern California. As many transportation agencies have consolidated functions and grown in size, the Commission remains true to the original intent of the state of California (State) legislation that first created it —now operating with a staff of 49 budgeted positions. This maintains the original vision of the State Legislature when it created the Commission in 1976. By doing so, the Commission remains effective in its role as a transportation planning and funding agency by maintaining productive relationships with other agencies. For example, Measure A funds local transportation priorities and needs. In FY 2015/16, the Commission will return $50.7 million in funding to local cities and the County for local streets and roads needs. The Commission also receives and programs funding from state and federal sources. This includes the State's Transportation Development Act program dollars that are allocated primarily to the County's major public transit providers. Measure A also pays its share by funding transit fare discounts and programs for senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited means and by operating a commuter assistance program that provides traveler information and ridesharing assistance to employers and commuters. A Commitment to Riverside County Ensuring local funding for transportation will require ongoing outreach to the public and transparent oversight and management that ensures public confidence in the Commission's fiduciary, oversight, and visionary roles. This budget document is intended to demonstrate the Commission's commitment to the public as well as documenting the Commission's dedication to sound budget practices. This budget document is one of many ways the Commission works to ensure public accountability and full transparency of its actions. Yet another Commission priority is in customer service and is demonstrated in our investment in the 1E511 Traveler Information Service and other motorist service programs such as outreach to employers for ridesharing assistance, the establishment and maintenance of freeway call boxes, and the Freeway Service Patrol program. As the Commission adds more responsibilities to become a toll facility operator, it will increase RCTC's interaction with the public that will only strengthen our commitment to communicating in an effective and proactive manner. We welcome public input and participation and invite you to visit our website at www.rctc.org or to follow us on Twitter @RCTC. GFOA Distinguished Budget Award The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to RCTC for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, an operations guide, a financial plan, and a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. The Commission believes this budget continues to conform to program requirements, and it will be submitted to GFOA to determine the Commission's eligibility for another award. Acknowledgements The preparation of this budget has been a collaborative effort of the Commission's staff. The budget reflects the Commission's desire to communicate the components of the budget in terms that are easily understandable and supportable for the general public. Staff acknowledges and appreciates the guidance and leadership of the Board of Commissioners and the sense of renewal and commitment it has and continues to inspire. Signature on file Signature on file Anne Mayer, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Commission Introduction State of California (State) law created the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission or RCTC) in 1976 to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County (County). The Commission's mission is to assume a leadership role in improving mobility in the County. The governing body consists of all five members of the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's 28 cities, and one non -voting member appointed by the Governor of California. The Commission is responsible for setting policies, establishing priorities, and coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and other agencies. The Commission also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal, state, and local funds for highway, transit, rail, non -motorized travel (bicycle and pedestrian), and other transportation activities. The Commission serves as the tax authority and implementation agency for the voter approved Measure A Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Measure A was originally approved by the County's electorate in 1988 and imposed a one-half of one cent transaction and use tax (sales tax) to fund specific programs that commenced in July 1989 (1989 Measure A). The 1989 Measure A was approved for 20 years and expired on June 30, 2009. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A beginning in July 2009 through June 2039 (2009 Measure A). Additionally, the Commission provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. These services include the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a program that provides call box service for motorists; the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP), a roving tow truck service to assist motorists with disabled vehicles on the main highways of the County during peak rush hour traffic periods; and Inland Empire 511 (IE511), a traveler information system. These services are provided at no charge to motorists and are funded through a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations. The Commission is also legally responsible for allocating Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds, the major source of funds for transit in the County. The TDA provides two sources of funding: the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), which is derived from a one -quarter of one cent state sales tax, and State Transit Assistance (STA), which is now derived from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel. Prior to 2010, STA revenues included the tax on gasoline. Finally, the Commission has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the County. As the CMA, the Commission coordinates with local jurisdictions in the establishment of congestion mitigation procedures for the County's roadway system. Riverside County Transportation Commission List of Principal Officials Board of Commissioners Name Title Agency Kevin Jeffries Member County of Riverside, District 1 John F. Tavaglione 2nd Vice Chair (Commission) County of Riverside, District 2 Chuck Washington Member County of Riverside, District 3 John J. Benoit Member County of Riverside, District 4 Marion Ashley Member County of Riverside, District 5 Deborah Franklin Vice Chair (Western Riverside County Programs and City of Banning Projects Committee) Brenda Knight Member City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck Member City of Blythe Ella Zanowic Member City of Calimesa Dawn Haggerty Member City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis Member City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez Member City of Coachella Karen Spiegel Member City of Corona Scott Matas Vice Chair (Commission) and Vice Chair (Eastern Riverside City of Desert Hot Springs County Programs and Projects Committee) Adam Rush Member City of Eastvale Linda Krupa Member City of Hemet Dana Reed Member City of Indian Wells Troy Strange Member City of Indio Frank Johnston Member City of Jurupa Valley Robert Radi Member City of La Quinta Bob Magee Chair (Budget and Implementation Committee) City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann Member City of Menifee Jesse Molina Member City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs Member City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna Member City of Norco Jan Harnik Vice Chair (Budget and Implementation Committee) City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat Member City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch Chair (Commission) City of Perris Ted Weill Member City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams Member City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk Member City of San Jacinto Michael Naggar Member City of Temecula Ben Benoit Chair (Western Riverside County Programs and Projects City of Wildomar Committee) John Bulinski Interim Governor's Appointee Caltrans, District 8 Management Staff Anne Mayer, Executive Director John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director Executive Summary Introduction The budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 is presented to the Board of Commissioners (Board) and the citizens of Riverside County. The budget outlines the projects the Commission plans to undertake during the year and appropriates expenditures to accomplish these tasks. The budget also shows the funding sources and fund balances that will be used for these projects. This document will serve as the Commission's monetary guideline. To provide the reader a better understanding of the projects, staff has included descriptive information regarding each department and major projects. The discussion in each department includes a review of accomplishments, major initiatives, and key assumptions. Staff used the goals and objectives approved at the Commission meeting on March 11, 2015, to prepare this budget. In addition to the Commission's guiding principles, long-term goals, and strategic plan, the short-term factors listed below were used to guide the development of the budget. Operational • Aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, right of way, and construction processes on the State Route (SR) 91 project (91 Project), Interstate (I) 215 corridor improvement project; 1-15 Express Lanes project; and Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension (Perris Valley Line) included in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice by continuing property acquisition and construction on the 91 Project and continuing to develop tolled express lanes on 1-15. • Provide leadership in the planning and development of the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service. • Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in western Riverside County (Western County). • Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities. • Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A ordinance and determine uses for any unexpended revenues. • Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental mitigation for the Mid County Parkway and SR- 79 realignment projects. • Work with local and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of the highways and regional arterials. • Continue active engagement in state and federal efforts to streamline and reform the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). • Consider future rail expansion opportunities including the potential for extension of the Perris Valley Line to the Hemet/San Jacinto and Temecula areas. • Support innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders with special transit needs. • Support cost controls and promote operating efficiency for transit operators. • Maintain effective partnerships among commuters, employers, and government to increase the efficiency of our transportation system by encouraging and promoting motorized and non -motorized transportation alternatives. • Continue to provide a motorist aid system that ensures safety and convenience to freeway motorists. • Maintain an active involvement in state and federal legislative matters to ensure that the Commission receives proper consideration for transportation projects and funding. • Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality -of -life needs for Riverside County. • Maintain close communication with Commissioners and educate policy makers on all issues of importance to the Commission. Financial • Fund administrative costs with allocations from Measure A, LTF, FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds. • Maintain administrative program delivery costs below the policy threshold of 4% of Measure A revenues; the FY 2015/16 Management Services budget is 3% of Measure A revenues. • Maintain administrative salaries and benefits at less than 1% of Measure A revenues; the FY 2015/16 administrative salaries and benefits is .99% of Measure A revenues. • Continue to maintain prudent cash reserves to provide some level of insulation for unplanned expenditures. • Maintain current strong bond ratings with rating agencies. • Move forward on Measure A projects for highways and regional arterials using sales tax revenues, TUMF revenues, and state and federal funding as well as financing alternatives such as commercial paper, sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, and federal loans. • Establish and maintain reserves for toll operations, capital improvements, and debt service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements. • Conduct enhanced outreach to businesses and contractors located in Riverside County regarding opportunities to provide competitive and qualified goods and/or services to the Commission. • Leverage and protect past Measure A investments in rail with state and federal funding for additional rail improvements, including the Perris Valley Line. • Maintain the enterprise resource planning (ERP) system to integrate project accounting needs and improve accounting efficiency. Budget Overview Total sources (Table 1) are budgeted at $779,368,800 which is a decrease of less than 1% over FY 2014/15 projected sources and a 34% decrease over the FY 2014/15 revised budget. Total sources are comprised of revenues of $382,013,500, transfers in of $136,077,400, and debt proceeds of $261,277,900. The projected fund balance at June 30, 2015 available for expenditures (excluding reserves for debt service of $112,811,300 and advances receivable of $32,014,100) is $686,984,200. Accordingly, total funding available for the FY 2015/16 budget totals $1,466,353,000. Table 1— Sources FY 2014-2016 FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Revised Budget FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Intergovernmental TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Transfers In Debt Proceeds $ 156,355,800 77,544,200 14,409,400 122,688,100 11,284,400 1,081,100 9,979,900 481,987,700 674,750,100 $ 167,000,000 81,500,000 12,944,700 182,315,400 12,154,600 575,000 2,450,900 526,661,100 191,600,000 $ 167,000,000 81,500,000 12,944,700 133,628,800 12,042,700 221,200 4,138,000 254,035,100 116,059,000 $ 170,000,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 100,896,000 12,053,800 235,000 2,456,300 136,077,400 261,277,900 $ 3,000,000 1,500,000 427,700 (81,419,400) (100,800) (340,000) 5,400 (390,583,700) 69,677,900 2% 2% 3% -45 % -1% -59 % 0% -74 % 36% TOTAL Sources $ 1,550,080,700 $ 1,177,201,700 $ 781,569,500 $ 779,368,800 $ (397,832,900) -34% Riverside County has specific competitive advantages over nearby coastal counties (Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego) including housing that was (and remains) more available and affordable and plentiful commercial real estate and land available for development at lower costs. Prior to the national recession, Riverside County's economy thrived, reflecting the area's competitive advantages over its neighboring counties, largely as a result of the County's continuing ability to draw jobs, residents, and affordable housing away from the Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego county areas. As a result, the County's employment and commercial base diversified and the County's share of the regional economy increased. During the nationwide recession, the County experienced high unemployment; reduced personal income, taxable sales, and residential building permits; a decrease in the rate of home sales and the median price of single-family residences; and high rates of notices of default on mortgage loans secured by single-family residences. The impact of the recession was amplified in the Inland Empire (i.e., Riverside and San Bernardino counties) due to its relatively greater growth and the relatively lower average income levels when compared to coastal areas. These factors resulted in fluctuating Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues and TUMF fees; however, as noted on Chart 1 the sales tax revenues have stabilized following the recession. Chart 1— Commission Sources Trend $800,000,000 $700,000,000 $600,000,000 $500,000,000 $400,000,000 $300,000,000 $200,000,000 $100,000,000 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Illm•Measu re A Sales Tax mlil..LTF Sales Tax •mAim•STA Sales Tax TUMF �•Federal, State, Local Revenues .0.1mTransfers In •De bt Proceeds While recovery from the nationwide recession in the local Inland Empire economy has lagged the nation and other areas of California, the local economy is experiencing significant improvement. Sales tax revenues have rebounded from the recent economic downturn's low point in 2010. The Commission's Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues for FY 2014/15 are projected to exceed their highest annual level that was reached in FY 2005/06. The Commission's economic outlook for FY 2015/16 continues to be cautiously optimistic; however, the state and federal budget issues continue to affect funding of the Commission's capital projects and programs. Ongoing problems with funding of the Federal Highway Trust Fund could cause delays in receipt of federal funding. Should Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues fluctuate and the availability of federal and state revenues continue to be uncertain, the timing and scope of the Commission's projects and programs may be impacted. While the Commission's primary revenues are the Measure A and LTF sales taxes, other revenues and financing sources are required to fund the Commission's programs and projects as illustrated in Chart 2. Chart 2 — Sources: Major Categories Debt Proceeds 33% Transfers In STA Sales Tax 18% 2% r. Intergovernmental ti 13% Investment Income 0% TUMF Revenue 2% Other Revenue 0% The State Board of Equalization (SBOE) recently provided to cities and other agencies its projections that statewide taxable sales over the next fiscal year will increase 5.7%. However, given the tenuous local economy, the Commission is not basing its estimate of revenues solely on the SBOE's projection and will continue its conservative projection practices. After taking the state of the local economy and recent revenue trends into consideration, staff projects Measure A sales tax revenues of $170,000,000 for FY 2015/16. This is a 2% increase from the FY 2014/15 revised projection of $167,000,000. At midyear the Commission will reassess sales tax revenue projections based on the economy and revenue trends. On behalf of the County, the Commission administers the LTF for public transportation needs, local streets and roads, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The majority of LTF funding received by the County and available for allocation is distributed to all public transit operators in the County, and the Commission receives allocations for administration, planning, and programming in addition to funding for Western County rail operations included in the commuter rail Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The LTF sales tax revenue received from the State is budgeted at $83,000,000; an increase of 2% from the FY 2014/15 revised projection of $81,500,000. STA funds generated from the statewide sales tax on motor vehicle fuel are allocated by formula by the State Controller to the Commission for allocations to the County's public transit operators. The STA transit allocation, which is based on recent State estimates, for FY 2015/16 is $13,372,400. Intergovernmental revenues include reimbursement revenues from federal sources of $46,890,300, state sources of $49,550,500, and local agencies of $4,455,200 for highway and rail capital projects, rail operations and station maintenance, commuter assistance, and motorist assistance programs as well as planning and programming activities. The significant decrease of 45% in FY 2015/16 compared to the FY 2014/15 revised budget is due to near completion of several projects including the Perris Valley Line and 1-215 corridor improvement projects. Reimbursement revenues vary from year to year depending on project activities and funding levels. As a result of an amended Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Commission will receive 48.7% of TUMF revenues (as updated by the most recent Nexus study). TUMF represents fees assessed on new residential and commercial development in Western County. FY 2015/16 TUMF fees are projected at $12,000,000 and are comparable to the FY 2014/15 revised projection of $12,000,000 and reflect the slow but encouraging signs in the housing market in the Inland Empire. Additional TUMF zone reimbursements of $53,800 are expected for the 74/215 interchange project. Other revenue of $235,000 is projected to decrease 59% from the prior year's budget of $575,000 and is related to property management revenues from properties acquired in connection with the 91 Project. Investment income in FY 2015/16 is anticipated to remain flat compared to the FY 2014/15 budget. Staff continues to actively manage its resources and make appropriate investments to maximize the return to the Commission without sacrificing security and affecting short-term cash requirements. Transfers in of $136,077,400 relate primarily to the transfer of available debt proceeds for highway projects; LTF funding for general administration, planning and programming, rail operations and station maintenance, and grade separation project allocations; approved interfund allocations for specific projects; and debt service requirements from highway, regional arterial, and local streets and roads funds. Debt proceeds consist of draw downs of $261,277,900 from the federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan related to the 91 Project. Total uses (Table 2), including transfers out of $136,077,400, are budgeted at $1,038,982,700, a decrease of 33% from the prior year budget amount of $1,560,710,300. Program expenditures and transfers out totaling $967,041,300 represent 93% of total budgeted uses in FY 2015/16. Program costs have decreased by 36% from $1,491,631,200 in FY 2014/15 due to significant completion of several projects identified below. Table 2 — Uses FY 2014-2016 FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 FY 14/15 Revised Budget Projected FY 15/16 Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Capital Highway, Rail, and Regional Arterials Capital Local Streets and Roads Commuter Assistance Debt Service Management Services Motorist Assistance Planning and Programming Public and Specialized Transit Rail Maintenance and Operations TOTAL Uses 849,155,400 46, 677,100 3,236,900 117,574,000 11,998,500 4,753,300 2,548,100 92,910,200 11,937,500 $ 1,140,791,000 1,271,944,900 49,882,000 3,455,400 54,696,200 14,382,900 5,583,800 6,380,800 136,381,700 18,002,600 1,560,710,300 742,331,700 49,882,000 3,665,400 54,696,200 13,415,300 5,338,100 4,275,200 92,767,600 14,864,800 981,236,300 $ 730,265,000 50,679,000 3,846,800 53,919,900 18,021,500 6,476,900 6,614,400 142,841,200 26,318,000 $ 1,038,982,700 (541,679,900) 797,000 391,400 (776,300) 3,638,600 893,100 233,600 6,459,500 8,315,400 $ (521,727,600) -43 % 2% 11% -1% 25 % 16% 4% 5% 46% -33% Note: Management Services includes Executive Management, Administration, Legislative Affairs and Communications, and Finance. Capital highway, rail, and regional arterials budgeted uses of $730,265,000 are 43% lower compared to the FY 2014/15 budget due to decreased operating transfers out of debt proceeds from capital projects funds to special revenue funds to finance 2009 Measure A Western County highway projects costs and significant completion of the 60/215 East Junction high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane connectors, SR-74 curve widening project, 1-215 corridor improvement project, and Perris Valley Line project. Local streets and roads expenditures of $50,679,000 reflect an increase of 2% over the FY 2014/15 budget and represent the disbursements to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. Debt Service of $53,919,900 has decreased 1% and is comparable to the FY 2014/15 revised budget. Commuter Assistance budgeted expenditures of $3,846,800 are 11% higher than FY 2014/15 budget due to increased expenditures related to new program administration and management structure, rideshare enhancements, and special incentive projects. Management Services expenditures have increased 25% or $3,638,600 from the FY 2014/15 budget due to information technology equipment upgrades, preparation for toll operations, and administration support. Motorist Assistance expenditures have increased 16% or $893,100 from the FY 2014/15 budget as a result of call box hardware upgrades and increased FSP construction service. Planning and Programming budgeted expenditures of $6,614,400 reflect a 4% increase from the FY 2014/15 budget due to increased projects and operations activities in connection with LTF disbursements for planning and programming and grade separation projects. Public and Specialized Transit budgeted expenditures of $142,841,200 are 5% higher than FY 2014/15 budget due to increased transit capital expenditures for public transit. The 46% increase in Rail Maintenance and Operation's budgeted expenditures of $26,318,000 is primarily due to commencement of Perris Valley Line operations and additional consultant work needed to perform planning and modeling for rail projects including the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service. Total uses included in the FY 2015/16 budget by major categories are illustrated in Chart 3. Chart 3 — Uses: Major Categories Planning and Programming 1% Motorist Assistance 1% Management Services 2% Debt Service 5% Commuter Assistance 0% Capital Local Streets and Roads 5% Commission Personnel Public and Specialized Transit 14% Rail Maintenance and Operations 2% Capital Highway, Rail, and Regional Arterials 70% The Commission's salary and benefits total $9,499,800 for FY 2015/16. This represents an increase of $1,169,500 or 14% over the FY 2014/15 revised budget of $8,330,300 (Chart 4). The increase relates to an increase of three full-time equivalents (FTE) to include a new Toll Senior Management Analyst, Toll Technology Manager, and Toll Operations Manager in preparation for toll operations that will commence in 2017; a 2% cost of living adjustment to offset the employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases; and an increase in the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS) employer contribution rate and dental, vision, and workers' compensation premiums. The Commission's salary schedule for FY 2015/16 is included in Appendix B and complies with Government Code §20636 "Compensation Earnable" and California Code of Register §570.5, "Requirements for a Publicly Available Pay Schedule". Beginning with FY 2013/14, the Commission implemented a phased approach over a three-year period requiring employees to pay their share of normal pension costs. The previous employer -paid member contribution by the Commission has been eliminated in FY 2015/16. Chart 4 - Salary and Benefits Costs: Five -Year Comparison $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 The FY 2015/16 FTE of 49 positions is higher compared to the FY 2014/15 level of 46 FTE (Table 3) as the Commission prepares for significant organization changes that include large transportation capital projects resulting in toll operations and the investment of billions of dollars requiring substantial attention at many staff levels. Management continues to be firmly committed to the intent of the Commission's enabling legislation that called for a small staff. Staff will continue to be provided the tools needed to ensure an efficient and productive work environment. However, it must be recognized that small is not viewed in an absolute context; it is relative to the required tasks to be performed and the demands to be met. Table 3 - Full -Time Equivalents by Department FY 2014-2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Executive Management 0.4 0.4 Administration 5.2 5.2 Legislative Affairs and Communications 2.2 2.2 Finance 7.1 7.0 Planning and Programming 5.9 5.1 Rail Maintenance and Operations 3.1 3.9 Public and Specialized Transit 2.4 2.4 Commuter Assistance 1.7 1.6 Motorist Assistance 0.9 1.2 Capital Project Development and Delivery 15.1 17.0 TOTAL 44.0 46.0 FY 15/16 0.4 5.0 2.3 7.4 5.6 4.0 2.2 1.9 1.0 19.2 49.0 The Commission provides a comprehensive package of benefits to all permanent, salaried employees. The package includes: health, dental, vision, and life insurance, short and long-term disability, workers' compensation, tuition assistance, sick and vacation leave, retirement benefits in the form of participation in CaIPERS, postretirement health care, deferred compensation, and employee assistance program. The compensation components are shown in Chart 5. Chart 5 — Personnel Salaries and Benefits Other Fringes 7% A. Health 12% ti Retirement 17% Salaries 64% ‘n.„..4441P Department Initiatives The preparation of each department's budget was based on key assumptions, accomplishments in FY 2014/15, major initiatives for FY 2015/16, and department goals and related objectives. Following are the key initiatives and summary of expenditures for each department (Tables 4 through 13). Executive Management • Continue project development and delivery as the key Measure A priority. • Continue construction on Riverside County's largest transportation project, the 91 Project. • Complete preliminary engineering and continue the design -build development and financing phase on the 1-15 Express Lanes project. • Advance public transit with the completion of the Perris Valley Line. • Continue planning efforts to advance passenger rail service in the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor. • Advocate for state investments in transportation and approval of a federal transportation bill to fund needed transportation priorities in the County and stimulate the local economy. • Initiate a Riverside County Transportation Plan for use in establishing integrated transportation visions and priorities. • Maintain regional cooperation and collaboration as a significant effort consistent with the philosophy and mission of the Commission. • Enhance external communications with media, business and civic groups, and the community. • Maintain an effective mid -sized transportation agency with a small and dedicated staff. Table 4 — Executive Management FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 145,600 $ 139,600 $ 139,100 $ 95,400 $ (44,200) -32% Professional 117,100 262,500 311,300 360,000 97,500 37% Support 42,600 72,500 73,000 87,100 14,600 20% TOTAL $ 305,300 $ 474,600 $ 523,400 $ 542,500 $ 67,900 14% Administration • Provide high quality support services to the Commission and to internal and external customers. • Continue to enhance the electronic records management system. " Continue to provide timely communications to Commissioners with continued emphasis on the utilization of electronic mail. " Continue to update technology to streamline processes and provide easier access to Commission records. " Support and develop a motivated workforce with a framework of activities and practices that comply with employment laws and regulations. Table 5 - Administration FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 573,400 $ 606,600 $ 528,900 Professional 148,900 363,000 286,000 Support 599,100 749,900 741,900 Capital Outlay 19,200 585,000 435,000 Debt Service 22,900 - - TOTAL $ 1,363,500 $ 2,304,500 $ 1,991,800 Legislative Affairs and Communications 617,600 448,500 746,700 175,000 $ 1,987,800 11,000 2% 85,500 24% (3,200) 0% (410,000) -70% N/A $ (316,700) -14% " Continue efforts to protect and seek greater state and federal investment in transportation infrastructure and goods movement. " Develop effective partnerships with transportation providers to communicate a unified message to Congress regarding mobility needs. " Advocate positions in the State Legislature and in Congress that advance the County's transportation interests. " Continue a leadership role in formulating a countywide direction on federal transportation policies. " Take a leadership role on the modernization of CEQA. " Engage in essential legislative negotiations to stabilize and increase transportation funding. " Seek an active role in ensuring the development of a road charge pilot program addressing the needs and concerns of Riverside County residents and businesses. " Coordinate with Self -Help Counties Coalition (SHCC) on legislation that would streamline statewide tolling policy. " Conduct a concerted outreach effort to new federal and state representatives on local transportation issues. " Continue to develop a broad public information program regarding the Commission's responsibilities and accomplishments through a variety of media formats and presentation opportunities including expanding the use of social media and other emerging technologies. " Continue to place an emphasis on providing proactive public communications support related to major project development efforts. " Conduct a public outreach program, "Operation Lifesaver", targeting schools on rail safety to include education, engineering, and enforcement in anticipation of the Perris Valley Line start up. " Conduct a small business expo jointly with the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency. " Provide new Commissioner -orientation meetings and other continuing education opportunities for Commissioners. Table 6 - Legislative Affairs and Communications FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 418,800 $ 510,700 $ 388,300 $ 600,500 $ 89,800 18% Professional 351,900 523,200 507,000 728,200 205,000 39% Support 146,500 155,500 79,500 187,700 32,200 21% TOTAL $ 917,200 $ 1,189,400 $ 974,800 $ 1,516,400 $ 327,000 27% Finance " Continue appropriate uses of long- and short-term financing to advance 2009 Measure A projects of the Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). " Apply the sales tax revenue forecast update to update a financing plan to support the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan and CVAG highway and regional arterial projects. " Continue to keep abreast of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) technical activities affecting the Commission's accounting and financial reporting activities and implement new pronouncements. " Continue to strengthen the ERP system to benefit all staff in the management of accounting and project information and automation of a paperless workflow system. " Manage a centralized procurements process in order to strengthen controls and ensure consistency in the application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable laws and regulations. " Conduct outreach activities to encourage disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) and small business enterprise (SBE) participation in various contracts. Table 7  Finance FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 887,300 $ 921,400 $ 926,300 $ 1,077,900 $ 156,500 17% Professional 2,950,100 3,343,500 3,019,000 2,648,300 (695,200) -21% Support 598,000 1,076,800 955,000 1,190,700 113,900 11% Capital Outlay - 25,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 100% Transfers Out 5,000,000 5,047,700 5,000,000 9,007,900 3,960,200 78% TOTAL $ 9,435,400 $ 10,414,400 $ 9,925,300 $ 13,974,800 $ 3,560,400 34% Planning and Programming " Monitor funding authority and responsibility related to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and impacts on the STIP caused by the state budget issues. " Ensure STIP and Proposition 1B funded projects are administered and implemented consistent with California Transportation Commission (CTC) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) policies. " Continue to strategically program projects and obligate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding, including monitoring the use of such funding to prevent funds from lapsing. " Focus on interregional concerns and maintain effective working relationships involving various multi -county transportation issues, including goods movement. " Coordinate planning efforts with regional and local agencies relating to the development of regional transportation plans (RTP) and green house gas reduction implementation guidelines. " Secure funding through the federal transportation bill for goods movement -related needs. " Monitor and track the TUMF regional arterial projects. " Work cooperatively with member agencies to continue the work efforts on the new Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) corridors. " Continue the Congestion Management Program (CMP) update and traffic monitoring along urban and rural highway systems. " Participate in the development of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) guidelines to represent the County's best interest in program funding. " Administer the SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program (SB821). " Monitor the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach's (Ports) projects for impacts on Riverside County. Table 8 — Planning and Programming FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 864,400 $ 983,700 $ 922,400 $ 1,114,100 $ 130,400 13% Professional 258,700 354,000 275,000 168,000 (186,000) -53% Support 16,600 20,600 17,100 23,300 2,700 13% Projects and Operations 1,408,400 4,522,500 2,860,700 5,259,000 736,500 16% Transfers Out - 500,000 200,000 50,000 (450,000) -90% TOTAL $ 2,548,100 $ 6,380,800 $ 4,275,200 $ 6,614,400 $ 233,600 4% Rail Maintenance and Operations • As a member of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), continue active participation in the governance and operations of the Metrolink commuter rail system. • Continue the planning and implementation of capital improvements at the commuter rail stations in Riverside County, including the Perris Valley Line, security and rehabilitation projects, and parking requirements. • Continue to support activities related to the Perris Valley Line project and evaluate its operational impact. • Establish best approach to build, maintain, and operate cost effective and environmentally sustainable facilities that meet the public's transportation needs. • Lead the service development process and actively coordinate with all stakeholders along the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor for intercity passenger rail service. Table 9 — Rail Maintenance and Operations FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 500,900 $ 662,500 $ 783,800 $ 760,600 $ 98,100 15% Professional 243,000 1,230,400 1,061,800 1,770,000 539,600 44% Support 1,080,700 1,910,000 1,202,600 3,012,600 1,102,600 58% Projects and Operations 10,099,800 14,064,700 11,809,800 20,706,300 6,641,600 47% Capital Outlay 13,100 135,000 6,800 68,500 (66,500) -49% TOTAL $ 11,937,500 $ 18,002,600 $ 14,864,800 $ 26,318,000 $ 8,315,400 46% Public and Specialized Transit • Support innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders having very special transit needs and monitor funding of these programs. • Complete the first year of specialized transit funding allocations related to the 2015 universal call for projects and continue to monitor performance. • Continue long-range planning activities to ensure that anticipated revenues are in line with projected levels of service by transit operators. • Continue public transit operator oversight and fiduciary responsibilities to ensure that annual fiscal audits and state triennial performance audits are conducted in accordance with TDA regulations. • Provide availability for local matching funds to Western County applicants seeking Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 federal capital grants. • Coordinate with operators on major capital purchases and investments into new rolling stock and other system improvements in order to maintain a viable on -hand reserve. • Coordinate with transit operators to provide connecting bus service to the Perris Valley Line stations. Table 10 - Public and Specialized Transit FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 349,900 $ 381,400 $ 310,400 Professional 196,000 192,000 176,000 Support 12,000 22,500 14,700 Projects and Operations 79,899,400 118,712,800 75,480,000 Transfers Out 12,452,900 17,073,000 16,786,500 TOTAL $ 92,910,200 $ 136,381,700 $ 92,767,600 Commuter Assistance $ 353,600 259,000 30,100 117,018,500 25,180,000 $ 142,841,200 $ (27,800) -7% 67,000 35% 7,600 34% (1,694,300) -1% 8,107,000 47% $ 6,459,500 5% • Improve the suite of services and outreach to rideshare participants and employer partners, including personalized information and electronic access and distribution. • Maintain and grow employer partnerships through value-added services and tools for ridesharing programs. • Maintain long-term partnership with San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to manage and implement a "sister" Commuter Assistance program for residents and employers in San Bernardino County. • Optimize park and ride facilities to support car/vanpool/buspool arrangements and facilitate transit connections. • Restructure program administration and management while maintaining existing rideshare coverage and service. Table 11- Commuter Assistance FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 286,200 $ 270,900 $ 319,300 $ 341,000 $ 70,100 26% Professional 601,400 343,000 403,800 419,000 76,000 22% Support 220,400 344,300 385,900 209,300 (135,000) -39% Projects and Operations 2,028,100 2,332,700 2,391,900 2,718,000 385,300 17% Capital Outlay - 5,000 5,000 - (5,000) -100% Transfers Out 100,800 159,500 159,500 159,500 0% TOTAL $ 3,236,900 $ 3,455,400 $ 3,665,400 $ 3,846,800 $ 391,400 11% Motorist Assistance • Assess opportunities for efficiency related to the call box program operations. • Maintain a high benefit -to -cost ratio related to the performance of the FSP program. • Operate and maintain the 1E511 system in accordance with national 511 implementation standards in partnership with SANBAG. • Implement a seamless service transition to call box hardware upgrades in anticipation of cellular technology migrations. • Utilize the opportunity to enhance coordination between California Highway Patrol (CHP) and Caltrans on traveler information. Table 12 - Motorist Assistance FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 114,600 $ 201,200 $ 170,500 Professional 525,600 721,400 727,400 Support 299,200 462,900 435,100 Projects and Operations 2,559,000 3,296,600 3,103,400 Transfers Out 1,254,900 901,700 901,700 TOTAL $ 4,753,300 $ 5,583,800 $ 5,338,100 $ 168,700 739,900 930,100 3,652,500 985,700 $ 6,476,900 (32,500) -16% 18,500 3% 467,200 101 355,900 11% 84,000 9% 893,100 16% Capital Project Development and Delivery • Continue construction activities on remaining 1989 Measure A projects including the SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange. • Continue project activities on the Perris Valley Line rail project, which was included in both the 1989 Measure A and 2009 Measure A programs. • Continue project work on the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan projects, including the 91/71 connectors; the 91 Project; 1-215 corridor improvement project; 1-15 Express Lanes project; SR-60 truck climbing lanes; SR-79 realignment; and Mid County Parkway. • Complete construction biological mitigation monitoring and weed abatement on the 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors and right of way support for the SR-74 curve widening projects. • Provide Western County Measure A regional arterial TUMF funding and support to local jurisdictions for regional arterial project engineering, right of way acquisition, and construction. • Provide 2009 Measure A funding to the incorporated cities, CVAG, and the County for local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction. • Provide funding and support of 2009 Measure A highway and regional arterial projects. • Develop strategies to implement alternative financing structures including public toll roads. • Maintain a right of way acquisition and management program in support of capital projects. • Manage right of way acquisition in the most cost effective manner and within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. • Maintain and manage the access, use, safety, and security of Commission -owned properties including commuter rail stations, properties in acquisition process, and income -generating properties. Table 13 — Capital Project Development and Delivery FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 2,736,300 $ 3,652,300 $ 3,782,200 Professional 7,470,700 8,478,100 5,739,300 Support 290,400 1,052,400 366,800 Projects and Operations 422,123,000 802,564,900 550,638,000 Capital Outlay 33,000 3,100,000 700,000 Debt Service 117,551,100 54,696,200 54,696,200 Transfers Out 463,179,100 502,979,200 230,987,400 TOTAL $ 1,013,383,600 $ 1,376,523,100 $ 846,909,900 Fund Balances $ 4,370,400 8,760,100 587,600 663,031,600 3,500,000 53,919,900 100,694,300 $ 834,863,900 $ 718,100 20% 282,000 3% (464,800) -44% (139,533,300) -17% 400,000 13% (776,300) -1% (402,284,900) -80% $ (541,659,200) -39% The total fund balance as of June 30, 2015 is projected at $831,809,600. The Commission's budgeted activities for FY 2015/16 are expected to result in a $259,613,900 decrease of total fund balance at June 30, 2016 to $572,195,700. The primary cause of the decrease is related to the project activities in FY 2015/16 related to the 91 Project, 1-215 corridor improvement project, Mid County Parkway, and the Perris Valley Line project. Table 14 presents the components of fund balance by governmental fund type and program at June 30, 2016. Table 14 — Projected Fund Balances by Governmental Fund Type and Program at June 30, 2016 Riverside County Transportation Commission $572,195,700 General Fund $4,457,100 Management Services Planning and Programming Rail Maintenance and Operations Budget Summary Special Revenue Funds $359,806,300 J $1,765,300 Measure A Western County: 1,920,100 Bond Financing $8,684,700 771,700 Commuter Assistance 14,493,400 Economic Development 3,429,700 Highways 14,610,300 Local Streets and Roads 600 New Corridors 56,701,300 Public and Specialized Transit 7,796,000 Rail 47,364,200 Regional Arterials 9,853,400 Measure A Coachella Valley: Highways and Regional Arterial 18,468,300 Local Streets and Roads 1,200 Specialized Transit 1,949,300 Measure A Palo Verde Valley Local Streets and Roads 600 Other Agency Projects Fund 37,100 Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass 1,823,500 Motorist Assistance 6,828,200 State Transit Assistance 54,299,200 Local Transportation Fund 97,510,500 TU M F: CETAP 6,051,900 Regional Arterials 9,902,900 Capital Projects Funds $118,153,800 • Highways $ 118,153,800 Debt Service Fund $89,778,500 The overall budget for FY 2015/16 is presented in Table 15 by summarized line items, Table 16 by operating and capital classifications, and Table 17 by governmental fund type, and highway, rail, and regional arterial program expenditures by project are summarized in Table 18. Table 15 — Budget Comparative by Summarized Line Item FY 2014-2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Actual Revised Budget FY 14/15 Projected FY 15/16 Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salaries and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Bond Premium Bond Discount Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) $ 156,355,800 77,544,200 14,409,400 38,313,400 82,797,200 1,577,500 11,284,400 1,081,100 9,979,900 $ 167,000,000 81,500,000 12,944,700 83,351,400 92,503,000 6,461,000 12,154,600 575,000 2,450,900 $ 167,000,000 81,500,000 12,944,700 67,665,500 60,628,500 5,334,800 12,042,700 221,200 4,138,000 393,342,900 458,940,600 411,475,400 6,877,400 8,330,300 8,271,200 12,863,400 15,811,100 12,506,600 3,305,500 5,867,400 4,271,600 16,168,900 21,678,500 15,441,600 12,804,000 90,668,700 157,564,700 91,297,400 89,644,300 117,200 46,677,100 13,902,700 21,754,300 17,909,000 242,335,200 255,303,500 186,945,900 139,744,300 1,220,000 49,882,000 30,400,000 16,778,200 17,268,300 10,203,700 159,626,000 227,943,000 65,715,300 92,540,700 707,000 49,882,000 22,397,800 518,117,700 945,494,200 67,112,900 43,410,200 7,050,900 7,400,000 47,296,200 646,283,800 7,400,000 47,296,200 117,574,000 65,300 54,696,200 3,850,000 54,696,200 1,171,800 658,803,300 1,034,049,200 727,201,200 (265,460,400) (575,108,600) 481,987,700 (481,987,700) 638,854,600 38,328,800 (2,433,300) 526,661,100 (526,661,100) 191,600,000 (315,725,800) 254,035,100 (254,035,100) 116,059,000 674,750,100 191,600,000 116,059,000 409,289,700 (383,508,600) (199,666,800) Beginning Fund Balance 622,186,700 1,031,476,400 1,031,476,400 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 1,031,476,400 $ 647,967,800 $ 831,809,600 $ 170,000,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 46,890,300 49,550,500 4,455,200 12,053,800 235,000 2,456,300 382,013,500 9,499,800 16,301,000 7,005,200 23,306,200 20,548,300 18,094,900 151,062,600 284,681,200 105,312,400 149,563,500 1,844,000 50,679,000 30,600,000 812,385,900 7,800,000 46,119,900 53,919,900 3,793,500 902,905,300 (520,891,800) 136,077,400 (136,077,400) 261,277,900 261,277,900 (259,613,900) 831,809,600 $ 572,195,700 $ 3,000,000 1,500,000 427,700 (36,461,100) (42,952,500) (2,005,800) (100,800) (340,000) 5,400 2% 2% 3% -44% -46% -31 % -1% -59 % 0% (76,927,100) -17% 1,169,500 14% 489,900 3% 1,137,800 19% 1,627,700 8% (1,206,000) -6% 185,900 1% (91,272,600) -38% 29,377,700 12 % (81,633,500) -44% 9,819,200 7% 624,000 51% 797,000 2% 200,000 1% (133,108,300) -14% 400,000 5% (1,176,300) -2% N/A (776,300) -1% (56,500) -1% (131,143,900) -13% 54,216,800 -9% (390,583,700) -74% 390,583,700 -74% N/A 69,677,900 36% N/A N/A 69,677,900 36% 123,894,700 -32% (199,666,800) -19% $ (75,772,100) -12% Table 16 — Operating and Capital Budget FY 2015/16 FY 15/16 Operating Budget FY 15/16 Capital Budget FY 15/16 TOTAL Budget Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sa les Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salaries and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way and Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance $ 15,901,000 $ 154,099,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 4,382,500 4,583,200 3,595,800 471,600 42,507,800 44,967,300 859,400 12,053,800 235,000 1,984,700 125,306,500 5,119,700 8,611,100 3,834,900 256,707,000 4,380,100 7,689,900 3,170,300 12,446,000 9,076,800 250,000 1,700,000 136,563,500 1,764,000 10,860,200 11,471,500 17,844,900 149,362,600 284,681,200 105,312,400 13,000,000 80,000 50,679,000 30,600,000 149,354,300 663,031,600 7,800,000 46,119,900 293,500 53,919,900 3,500,000 167,213,500 735,691,800 (41,907,000) (478,984,800) 27,105, 500 108,971,900 (26,383,100) (109,694,300) - 261,277,900 722,400 260,555,500 (41,184,600) (218,429,300) 230,301,700 601,507,900 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 189,117,100 $ 383,078,600 $ 170,000,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 46,890,300 49,550,500 4,455,200 12,053,800 235,000 2,456,300 382,013,500 9,499,800 16,301,000 7,005,200 23,306,200 20,548,300 18,094,900 151,062,600 284,681,200 105,312,400 149,563,500 1,844,000 50,679,000 30,600,000 812,385,900 7,800,000 46,119,900 53,919,900 3,793,500 902,905,300 (520,891,800) 136,077,400 (136,077,400) 261,277,900 261,277,900 (259,613,900) 831,809,600 $ 572,195,700 Table 17 — Budget by Governmental Fund Type FY 2015/16 General Fund Special Revenue Capital Projects Debt Service FY 15/16 TOTAL Budget Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Personnel Salaries and Benefits Professional and Support Professional Services Support Costs TOTAL Professional and Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out TIFIA Loan Proceeds Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance $ 3,000,000 $ 4,000,000 841,200 875,000 11,100 167,000,000 $ 83,000,000 13,372,400 40,123,300 48,709,300 3,580,200 12,053,800 235,000 897,400 879,500 2,767,000 668,300 8,727,300 368,971,400 4,433,200 3,569,000 5,248,100 5,066,600 12,732,000 1,757,100 879,500 3,435,300 8,817,100 14,489,100 2,696,300 17,852,000 18,094,900 500,000 150,562,600 284,681,200 105,312,400 19, 545,000 130,018,500 1,764,000 80,000 50,679,000 30,600,000 24,505,300 787,880,600 7,800,000 46,119,900 293,500 3,500,000 53,919,900 38,049,100 810,936,300 (29,321,800) (441,964,900) 26,344,300 54,504,700 (57,900) (89,542,500) 261,277,900 53,919,900 879,500 (50,484,600) 27,776,600 27,451,800 (46,477,000) 26,286,400 226,240,100 (18,700,400) 27,451,800 (3,035,400) (215,724,800) (17,820,900) (23,032,800) 7,492,500 575,531,100 135,974,700 112,811,300 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 4,457,100 $ 359,806,300 $ 118,153,800 $ 89,778,500 $ 170,000,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 46,890,300 49,550,500 4,455,200 12,053,800 235,000 2,456,300 382,013,500 9,499,800 16,301,000 7,005,200 23,306,200 20,548,300 18,094,900 151,062,600 284,681,200 105,312,400 149,563,500 1,844,000 50,679,000 30,600,000 812,385,900 7,800,000 46,119,900 53,919,900 3,793,500 902,905,300 (520,891,800) 136,077,400 (136,077,400) 261,277,900 261,277,900 (259,613,900) 831,809,600 $ 572,195,700 Table 18 — Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs FY 2015/16 Description Projects and operations Bechtel program management SCRRA program management Other TOTAL PROJECTS -GENERAL Highway engineering 91/71 interchange improvement 1-15 Express Lanes Mid County Parkway SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange Riverside County- Santa Ana River Trail SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY ENGINEERING Regional arterial engineering Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including SR-79 realignment Rail engineering Riverside Downtown/Pedley station improvements La Sierra station improvements Perris Valley Line and other rail projects Other- Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor (details presented in Section 6.2 Rail) SUBTOTAL RAIL ENGINEERING TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL ENGINEERING Highway construction 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors 74/215interchange 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road 91 Project SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange Riverside quiet zones Riverside County - Santa Ana River Trail General (details presented in Section 6.3 Planning and Programming) SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION Regional arterial construction Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including SR-79 realignment Various Western County Measure A regional arterial projects SUBTOTAL REGIONAL ARTERIAL CONSTRUCTION Rail construction Riverside Downtown/Pedley station improvements La Sierra station improvements Station rehabilitation Station Security Perris Valley Line and other rail projects Other- Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor (details presented in Section 6.2 Rail) SUBTOTAL RAIL CONSTRUCTION TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL CONSTRUCTION Highway design build 91 Project 1-15 Express Lanes TOTAL HIGHWAY DESIGN BUILD Highway right of way and land SR-60 truck climbing lanes 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment)/Scott Road to Nuevo Road Mid County Parkway SR-74 curve widening 1-15 Express Lanes SR-74/1-15 to 7th Street 91/71 interchange improvement 91 Project SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange MSHCP land acquisition in Western County Grade separation projects Riverside County - Santa Ana River Trail General SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND Regional arterial right of way and land Various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects, including SR-79 realignment Rail right of way and land Perris Valley Line and other rail projects La Sierra station improvements General SUBTOTAL RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND GRAND TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL PROGRAMS $ 8,706,600 3,350,000 8,491,700 $ 20,548,300 $ 125,000 2,900,000 12,000,000 35,000 90,000 15,150,000 2,407,400 27,500 105,000 155,000 250,000 537,500 $ 18,094,900 $ 15,000 70,000 12,150,000 12,775,800 832,900 5,773,200 250,000 500,000 32,366,900 10,683,300 46,582,000 57,265,300 1,503,000 2,690,000 3,250,000 300,000 52,487,400 1,200,000 61,430,400 $ 151,062,600 $ 274,681,200 10,000,000 $ 284,681,200 $ 1,044,000 10,000 225,000 18,200,000 392,000 10,000 650,000 2,795,000 70,985,600 2,369,000 3,000,000 1,657,000 100,000 45,200 101,482,800 2,286,600 1,333,000 10,000 200,000 1,543,000 $ 105,312,400 S R79_e99Ann Gann Appropriations Limit In November 1979, the voters of the State approved Proposition 4, commonly known as the Gann Initiative (Gann). The proposition created Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, placing limits on the amount of revenue that can be spent by public agencies from the "proceeds of taxes." In 1980, the State Legislature added Section 7910 to the Government Code, providing that the governing body of each local jurisdiction must establish, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the following year. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year is equal to the previous year's limit adjusted for population changes and changes in the California per capita income. The Commission is subject to the requirements of Article XIIIB. Gann appropriations limits are calculated for and applied to the Commission. In accordance with the requirements of Article XIIIB implementing legislation, the Board approved Resolution No. 15-012 on June 10, 2015, establishing appropriations limits for the Commission at $392,995,203. The FY 2015/16 budget appropriated $320,182,600 in taxes for the Commission, falling well within the limits set by the Gann. Based on historic trends and future projections, it appears the Commission's use of the proceeds of taxes, as defined by Article XIIIB, will continue to fall below the appropriations limit. The calculation for the FY 2015/16 appropriations limit is as follows: 2014-2015 Appropriations Limit $ 373,714,246 2015-2016 adjustment: Change in California per capita personal income Change in Population, Riverside County Per Capital Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 3.82 + 100 = 100 3.82% 1.29% 1.0382 Population converted to a ratio: 1.29 + 100 = 1.0129 100 Calculation of factor for FY 2015-2016: 1.0382 x 1.0129 = 1.05159278 $373,714,246 x 1.05159278 = $392,995,203 2015-2016 Appropriations Limit $ 392,995,203 Source: California per capita income —California Department of Finance Population, Riverside County —California Department of Finance Commission Policy Goals and Objectives At its January 2015 workshop, the Commission discussed its vision related to the future of the County's transportation system. This process resulted in five statements that state the Commission's guiding principles: RCTC's Guiding Principles • Together, we are imagining and implementing an efficient transportation system for the good of all in Riverside County. • We are the people we serve. Economic prosperity and quality of life is enhanced with proper transportation. The public trust is vital to our mission. • We operate in a dynamic environment. We will remain flexible in order to respond to change and opportunity. We will focus on projects and allocate funds that support the quality of life in Riverside County. We collaborate in partnerships to maximize our ability to get people where they want to go and when they want to get there. • Our priority is to serve the public need. We will invest in a transportation system that moves community members, visitors, and goods. This system will support our economy and our future prosperity and is vital to attract and retain quality jobs to our region. • We are dedicated to environmental stewardship. We will use existing regional and countywide plans, such as the Riverside County Integrated Plan, as a framework for our decisions. We know that goods moving to, within, and through the County are vital to our economy; however we desire and will work toward a future where there is a balance between goods movement and our quality of life. In addition to financial and administration policies, the Commission has seven long-term policy goals that support the Commission's vision for transportation in Riverside County: promote mobility, mitigate and address the impact of goods movement, encourage economic development, ensure improved system efficiencies, foster environmental stewardship, support transportation choices through intermodalism and accessibility, and prioritize public and agency communications. For each of these policy goals, the objectives and initiatives that were considered in the framework of the work plan for the FY 2015/16 budget are identified below. While Riverside County shows signs of economic recovery, the Commission remains cautious about revenue availability. The need for better transportation remains a top public priority as demonstrated in the Commission's vision statements, and the Commission is poised to address this challenge via the seven policy goals. In moving forward with an aggressive program of projects and services, the Commission may face fluctuating Measure A, TUMF, and TDA revenues and uncertainty regarding the availability of federal and state transportation revenues. Due to the long-term nature of many of the Commission's programs, many of the policy goals' objectives and initiatives are ongoing from year to year. Promote Mobility The Commission, in cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies, will strive to create a transportation system that promotes efficient mobility both within the County and region. • Continue to aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, and construction processes on key components of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice with the continued development of tolled express lanes on SR-91 and 1-15. • Continue to provide leadership in the planning and development of the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service through the Alternatives Analysis Report and continue to seek out grant opportunities with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for phase II funding. Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley, including CVAG and Sun Line Transit Agency (SunLine) to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities. • Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A ordinance and determine use(s) for any unexpended revenues. • Complete environmental studies and develop an implementation plan for future phases of the Mid County Parkway project. " Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the SR-79 realignment project. " Continue to collaborate with state and federal agencies and local partners to develop and fund projects programmed in the STIP, Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), Proposition 1B bond programs, ATP, Cap and Trade Programs, and Measure A program as well as other high priority regional projects. " Maximize obtaining all available transportation funds and strategically program funds to meet funding deadlines and to prevent the lapse and loss of funds. " Leverage the effective application and use of Measure A Western County regional arterial and other state and federal funds to deliver eligible regional arterial projects. " Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the TUMF Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in Western County. " Actively participate in the SR-91 Advisory Committee to facilitate near and long-term improvements to SR-91, enhance intercounty public transit options, and foster mobility improvements between the two counties. " Advocate streamlining efforts at the state and federal levels that will reduce costs, time, and delays currently associated with project delivery including, but not limited to, timely project reviews and approvals. " Continue active engagement in state and federal efforts to streamline and reform CECA and NEPA to improve the ability to deliver critical projects that enhance mobility within the County and the region. " Continue to coordinate and provide public access to commuter information via the 1E511 system and focus commuter assistance and 1E511 outreach efforts under one brand. " Continue cooperation with the FTA regarding the Small Starts process to support the completion of construction and initiation of the Perris Valley Line commuter rail service in 2015. " Continue to work with the public transit operators to control costs and increase system efficiencies in order to accommodate and adjust to fluctuating revenues from local, state and federal sources. " Continue to develop transit service to further promote seamless intracity, intercity and regional transit connectivity for County residents. " Consider future rail expansion opportunities including the potential for extension of the Perris Valley Line to the Hemet/San Jacinto and Temecula areas. Mitigate and Address the Impact of Goods Movement The Commission will work with federal, state, and local governments to facilitate the movement of goods and services to, within, and through the County, recognizing the vital role goods movement mobility plays in the economic health of the County, the State, and the nation. " Seek funding and local agency concurrence to implement the Commission's approved, high -priority railroad grade separation list to mitigate the impact of increased goods movement demands on the transportation system. " Encourage Congress to create a federal freight trust fund, or similar program with a dedicated and firewalled revenue structure, in order to treat the nation's multimodal national goods movement network as a system rather than individual projects. " Remain committed to a regional approach regarding goods movement issues in order to maximize funding from state and federal sources to goods movement needs in Southern California. " Continue working with the Ports and regional transportation commissions to develop a funding mechanism for needed projects and mitigation on a regional basis. " Provide input to the National Freight Advisory Committee regarding the establishment of a national freight network and California State Freight Advisory Committee regarding regional freight priorities. Encourage Economic Development Transportation decisions will consider the economic benefits derived from any improvement, and, where feasible and practical, will pursue transportation alternatives that enhance or complement economic development. " Commit to seek opportunities related to transportation projects that will create jobs and improve the economic base in the County. " Support local agencies in the design and construction of interchanges that are in proximity to regional economic centers and developments. " Support local projects, consistent with countywide transportation goals and Commission commitments, which enhance business development, local employment, and area tourism. Ensure Improved System Efficiencies The Commission will select projects and allocate funds in a manner that will improve safety and reduce congested traffic corridors. " Advocate the development and use of advanced technologies for transportation applications that are affordable and practical. " In partnership with SANBAG, continue to implement enhancements to 1E511 for improved deployment of real-time traffic information, real-time bus and rail transit trip planning information, and rideshare information available to commuters for the purpose of trip planning and reducing congestion. " Assure the effectiveness of transit planning through coordination with the County's eight transit operators, Citizens' Advisory Committee, and annual SRTP process with a goal toward promoting program productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness. " Provide innovative commuter rideshare programs to reduce single occupant vehicle trips. " Collaborate with local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the CHP to continue efficient delivery of a comprehensive motorist aid system which includes an 1E511 traveler information service, a call box program, and a FSP program, including temporary services in freeway construction zones. " Leverage resources to incorporate park and ride facilities and additional connecting bus service at Metrolink stations that may have available capacity. " Continue working with Caltrans to monitor traffic conditions for the purpose of focusing transportation funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies. " Collaborate with Caltrans and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of the highways and regional arterials. " Support the implementation of active transportation facilities that support transportation alternatives. Foster Environmental Stewardship The Commission will achieve its mobility goals while promoting environmental stewardship and protecting the area's natural resources and quality of life. " Continue working with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), Caltrans, and state/federal resource agencies to implement the MSHCP. " Collaborate with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), sub -regional agencies, and local jurisdictions to implement the current RTP and sustainable communities' strategy that meets regional air quality goals, conformity guidelines, and SB375 California's Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB375) green house reduction targets for the SCAG region. " Support a variety of outreach channels and educational programs that promote the benefits of ridesharing, public and specialized transit, rail, and availability of commuter resources for the purposes of reducing vehicle trips, vehicle miles traveled, and emissions. " Facilitate private/public use of clean fuels technology. " Continue to develop sustainable and green commuter rail stations and provide upgrades and rehabilitation projects to reduce the environmental impact of the existing stations. Support Transportation Choices through Intermodalism and Accessibility County residents will be served, where economically feasible, through the development of transportation alternatives and travel options that consider the needs of a wide range of citizens. • Work with transit providers and local social service agencies to provide specialized transit service to meet a broad spectrum of socio-economic transit needs of seniors, veterans, persons with disabilities, and low income residents. • Leverage commuter and motorist assistance outreach channels in order to increase the awareness and use of alternative commuting modes. • Implement the Commission's commuter rail SRTPs and SCRRA's plan for Metrolink commuter rail services. • Continue to pursue the goals and objectives as outlined in the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) for Riverside County related to a unified, comprehensive but flexible strategy for transportation service delivery to address transportation gaps between current services and needs of elderly individuals, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited income. • Enhance security, surveillance, and emergency response capabilities of County transit facilities and roadway infrastructure through proactive planning, interagency coordination, and investment. • Collaborate with public transit operators to ensure connecting bus service to new Perris Valley Line stations. Prioritize Public and Agency Communications The Commission will provide timely, informative, and accurate reporting to encourage informed public and agency participation in the Commission's decision -making processes. • Promote a close working relationship with news and civic entities to increase interest and understanding of transportation and related issues. • Enhance the provision of public information through various forms of communication (e.g., website, social media, annual report, monthly newsletter, television, Speakers Bureau, print media, radio, etc.). • Maintain an ongoing effort of informing Riverside County's Congressional and State Legislative delegations regarding transportation issues. • Develop an effective long-range legislative strategy regarding state and federal funding and policy. • Protect and enhance flexibility in the Commission's use of state and federal transportation revenue in addressing regional priorities and needs. • Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality -of -life needs for Riverside County. • Seek legislative flexibility for innovation in financing, construction, and maintenance of regional transportation projects. • Pursue policy objectives contained in the Commission's comprehensive adopted legislative platforms. • Maintain ongoing efforts to educate commuters, businesses, and the public regarding the Commission's toll planning efforts and specific project development efforts underway. • Keep the public informed about construction -related impacts from projects. Financial and Administration Policies Financial Planning Policies • Administrative costs, including salaries and benefits, shall be funded by allocations from Measure A, LTF, FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds. • The Commission shall budget no more than one percent (1%) of Measure A sales tax revenues for administrative salaries and benefits. • Administrative program delivery costs will be budgeted at whatever is reasonable and necessary, but not to exceed four percent (4%) of Measure A sales tax revenues (inclusive of the one -percent salary limitation). The Commission shall budget 100% of the annual required contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. • The Commission shall utilize unexpended 1989 Measure A funds only for projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A. Sales tax revenues from the 2009 Measure A shall be expended only for projects and programs included in the 2009 Measure A. • Amounts will be budgeted by fiscal year for multi -year projects, based on best available estimates, with the understanding that, to the extent actuals vary from those estimates and the project is ongoing, adjustments will be made on a continual basis. • The fiscal capital budget should be consistent with the strategic plan and deviations appropriately noted, explained, and justified. • A balanced budget shall be adopted annually with operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses equal to or less than identified revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances. Revenue Policies • Sales tax revenue projections will be revised semi-annually to ensure use of current and relevant data. Staff may adjust annual amounts during the budget preparation process to reflect the most current economic trends. • A strategic application of local funding sources will be used to maximize federal and state funding of projects. • Fiduciary responsibility regarding Western County TUMF revenues shall be exercised, and revenues will be allocated pursuant to Commission direction and the approved 2009 Measure A. • Adopted toll revenue policies will establish congestion pricing in order to maximize throughput on toll facilities. Such pricing will be adjusted quarterly by pre -defined formulas. • Proceeds from the disposition, in accordance with federal, state and local regulations, of excess properties owned by the Commission will be returned to the programs which provided the funding sources for the property acquisition. Debt Management Policies • The Debt Management Policy, as revised on April 10, 2013, and the Interest Rate Swap Policy, as adopted July 12, 2006, shall be updated as necessary for matters related to sales tax revenue and toll -supported indebtedness. • Outstanding sales tax revenue bonds shall not exceed $975 million. • Toll revenue supported debt may be issued for specific highway projects and may comprise toll revenue bonds and federal loans. • The Commission will maintain 2.0x debt ratio coverage on all senior sales tax revenue debt and 1.3x debt ratio coverage on all toll revenue debt. • Debt issuance will be for major capital projects including engineering, right of way, and construction. Operating requirements, if any, must be paid from current ongoing revenues and may not be financed except for initial toll operations. • Costs of issuance, including the standard underwriter's discount, will not exceed two percent (2%). • The Commission may enter into interest rate swaps to better manage assets and liabilities and take advantage of market conditions to lower overall costs and reduce interest rate risk. • While it is the intent of the Commission to establish a cash debt reserve for long term bond issuance, as necessary, surety bonds can be obtained when beneficial to the Commission. • All sales tax revenue debt must mature prior to the termination of 2009 Measure A on June 30, 2039. • All toll revenue supported debt must mature prior to the expiration of toll facility agreements. Expenditure Accountability Policies • Established priorities for planning and programming of capital projects will be reviewed annually with the Commission. • Actual expenditures will be compared to the budget on at least a quarterly basis, and significant deviations will be appropriately noted, explained, and justified. • Operations and maintenance agreements for toll operations will be implemented, and related costs will be compared to toll financing assumptions. Reserve Policies • The Commission will maintain program reserves in accordance with Measure A and TDA policies and guidelines. • The Commission will establish and maintain a transit operator's reserve of ten percent (10%) for the Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. Additionally, a ten percent (10%) reserve will be established and maintained for each of the Western County transit operators (public bus and commuter rail). • The Commission will establish and maintain reserves for toll operations, capital improvements, and debt service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements. Cash Management and Investment Policies • Where possible, the Commission will encourage receipt of funds by wire transfer to its accounts. • Balances in the bank operating account will be maintained at the amount necessary to meet monthly expenditures. • Construction and operating funds will be invested per the Commission's established Investment Policy, as revised on September 10, 2014, emphasizing in order of priority: 1) safety, 2) liquidity, and 3) yield. • Cash disbursements to local jurisdictions and vendors/consultants will be completed in an expeditious and timely manner. Procurement Policies • The Commission will conduct enhanced outreach to businesses and contractors located in Riverside County regarding opportunities to provide the Commission with competitive and qualified goods and/or services. • The Commission will continuously evaluate its procurement program and policies to ensure competitive, transparent, objective, and fair selection processes. • The Commission will continue to expand and improve vendor access to contracting opportunities. Auditing, Accounting, and Financial Reporting Policies • The Commission will maintain its ERP system in order to integrate project and toll operations accounting needs and improve accounting efficiency. • The Commission will issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR); separate financial reports for the LTF, STA, Proposition 1B Rehabilitation and Security Project Accounts, and toll operations upon commencement of such operations; and State Controller's Transportation Planning Agency Financial Transactions Report as well as Government Compensation in California Report. • An audit is to be conducted annually on the Commission's accounting books and records. As long as the Commission has outstanding bonds and federal loans, an independent accounting firm must conduct the audit. • The Commission is responsible for ensuring that audits of Measure A and TDA funding recipients are completed and reviewed for compliance and other matters in a timely manner. Human Resources Management Policies • While accommodating the assumption of toll operation responsibilities, Commission staffing levels will be consistent with the intent of its enabling legislation, which envisioned a small, but effective staff. • Contract staff and consultants will be used to augment staff efforts as much as necessary to support programs or workloads, which do not appear to be of a permanent nature. Information Technology Management Policy • Significant effort will be made to maintain efficient and cost-effective technology infrastructure by continuously upgrading network equipment and software to ensure quality performance, productivity, and connectivity among staff, other agencies, toll operator, and the public. Network security will continue to be a top priority to maintain the integrity of the Commission's network and information. Linking Commission Policy Goals and Departmental Goals and Objectives The following matrix (Table 19) illustrates the linkage of the Commission's overall policy goals described in this section to the individual departmental goals and objectives included in Section 6. Table 19 — Relationship Between Commission and Departmental Goals Goods System Environmental Economic Intermodalism & Financial & Department Mobility Movement Efficiencies Stewardship Development Accessibility Communications Administration Management Services Executive Management X X X X X X X X Administration X X Legislative Affairs & Communications X X X X Finance X Regional Programs Planning and Programming X X X X X X X X Rail Maintenance and Operations X X X X X Public and Specialized Transit X X X X X Commuter Assistance X X X X X X Motorist Assistance X X X X X X Capital Project Development & Delivery X X X X X X X X Budget Process Summary The budget is the primary performance tool used to measure and control accountability of public agencies for taxpayer dollars. The budget communicates to all stakeholders (i.e., elected officials, regional agencies, and citizens) how the investment they made will be put to use by providing detailed information on the specifics of resource allocation and expenditures. Progress is monitored on a monthly basis, and revisions and updates are made as deemed necessary to reflect changing dynamics and accommodate unplanned requests. This results in a budget document that is useful and meaningful as a benchmark against which to evaluate government accomplishments and/or challenges and to assess compliance with fiscal accountability. Unlike many governments that provide direct services to the general public, the Commission has the overall responsibility of managing transportation planning and funding for Riverside County. As a result its budget, in terms of dollars, is comprised primarily of capital -related programs and projects; the operating component of the budget is related to multimodal programs (commuter and motorist assistance services, rail operations, and transit planning). Management services, which consist of executive management, administration, legislative affairs and communications, and finance, provide support to both capital and operating programs and projects. Chart 7 depicts the organization of the Commission's oversight and management functions. The budget process consists of six primary tasks conducted in phases throughout the fiscal year. Chart 6 illustrates the budget process for the development of the FY 2015/16 budget and monitoring of the FY 2014/15 budget. A summary of each task is described below. Chart 6 — Budget Process ID Task Name Short Term Strategic Direction Phase Resource Identification and Allocation Phase Needs Assessment Phase Development and Review Phase Adoption and Implementation Phase Budget Roles and Responsibilities Duration 140 days 200 days 120 days 150 days 60 days 365 days Short -Term Strategic Direction Phase 2014 2015 The first phase of the budget process is to determine the direction of the Commission in the short-term and to integrate this with the Commission's long-term goals and objectives, including the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan as discussed in Section 6.3. Annually a workshop is held for the Board to evaluate and determine where the Commission plans to be and what it desires to accomplish over the next five to ten years. Annual reviews allow for timely responsiveness to any significant political, legislative, or economic developments that may occur locally, statewide, or nationally. Staff then adjusts its course based on the long-term strategic direction of the policy makers. Staff convenes in early January to both assess actual results, compared to the current year budget, and map changes in strategy for the ensuing fiscal year by reviewing and, if necessary, redefining departmental mission statements and setting goals. Those goals, upon review by the Board, become the Commission's short-term strategic direction. Chart 7 — Functional Organization Chart FY 2015/16 Board of Commissioners Policy Committees •WRC Programs & Projects •ERC Programs & Projects *Budget & Implementation Advisory Committees *Technical Advisory *Citizens Advisory Executive Committee Legal Counsel Executive Management I Administration — Clerk of the Board & Board Relations — Claims Administration Human Resources Office & Records Management I Finance — Budget Development Contract Management & Procurement Disadvantaged Business Enterprise — Financial Management — Insurance Administration Resource Identification and Allocation Phase �islative� Communications — Goods Movement Legislative Advocacy & Analysis Media Relations Public Information & Communications I Multimodal Programs — Call Box Program — Commuter Assistance — Freeway service Patrol — Rail Operations — Transit Planning I Capital Project Development & Delivery — Congestion Management Highway & Rail Capital Programs New Corridors — Property Management Regional Transportation Plan State Transportation Improvement Program TUMF Program Simultaneous with the short-term strategic direction phase, staff focuses on what funding sources are available and what monies are estimated as carryover from the current year. Additionally, the Commission's fund balances, that are the excess of fund assets over fund liabilities, are analyzed for available appropriation in the following fiscal year. In actuality, resource identification occurs throughout the year, but it is finalized in the upcoming fiscal year budget. Amounts to be borrowed are determined as parts of the long-term strategic planning process, but such amounts are adjusted in the annual budget to reflect more current information. Needs Assessment Phase Staff and consultants evaluate what projects and studies need to be accomplished. Project priority and sequencing set in the long-term strategic plan are the top candidates for budget submission. However, priorities may have changed due to economic necessities or political realities, resulting in projects being rescheduled by acceleration or postponement. New projects may be added or existing priorities deleted based on Commission direction. Development and Review Phase Using all the data and information gathered from the previously mentioned stages, department managers submit their desired budgets to the Finance Department. The information, along with staff and overhead allocations, is compiled into a preliminary or draft budget. After review by the Executive Director and inclusion of the desired changes, the draft budget is presented to the Board for input. Adoption and Implementation Phase The proposed budget is submitted to the Commission at its May meeting. A hearing is scheduled to allow for public comment on the proposed budget. The Commission may choose, after public hearing, to adopt the budget or to request additional information and/or changes to the budget. The budget must be adopted no later than June 15 of each year. Upon adoption by the Commission, the budget is entered into the ERP system effective July 1 for the next fiscal year. Budget Roles and Responsibilities Involvement in the budget permeates all staffing levels, as presented in Chart 8, at the Commission from clerical support staff to policy makers. Each program manager develops a detailed line item budget that consists of the operating and/or capital components. Those budgets, by program, are submitted to the department director for review and concurrence. The department managers submit their budgets to the Chief Financial Officer by mid -March. The Finance Department compiles the department budgets. Both the capital and operating budgets are combined into the draft budget for the entire Commission. The Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director review the entire budget for overall consistency with both the short- and long-term strategic direction of the Commission, appropriateness of funding sources for the identified projects and programs, and reasonableness of the operating and capital budget expenditures. Expenditure activities of the funds are controlled at the budgetary unit, which is the financial responsibility level (General, Measure A, Motorist Assistance, LTF, STA, TUMF, Other Agency Projects, Capital Projects, and Debt Service Funds) for each function (i.e., administration, programs, intergovernmental distributions, debt service, capital outlay, and other financing uses). These functions provide the legal level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount). Budget -to -actual reports are available to program managers and directors on a real-time basis through the ERP system for informational and management purposes, including identification and evaluation of any significant budget variations. During the fiscal year management has the discretion to transfer budgeted amounts within the financial responsibility unit according to function or may provide support for supplemental budget appropriations requests. Supplemental budget requests require the authorization of the Commission. The Commission may take action at any monthly meeting to amend the budget. In some years, the Finance Department may compile miscellaneous requests and submit a budget appropriations adjustment at mid -year to the Commission for approval. Those budget amendments approved by the Commission are incorporated into the budget, as they occur, and are reflected in the CAFR in the final budget amounts reported in the budgetary schedules. Chart 8 — Staff Organization Chart FY 2015/16 Is,al *autumn; P.m*, ltnpury Orator of iliuwp *animist Notion inuivau Iktud CoauTottomoot Fula.. Omuta Goo& Movement RWtp. Rill uumm L Manapnmmr anaMr Reta* —Gumming. RelNnm Iranut Manner iaFni.vn Rwapu Ase.stanM LManasanmr Aneryv ax&Ike Comma* & orm Annrav n1an�14w14.11$. LIaaiuirm.nr nnalyar Alanarromt"Naha *Out palltno.y peaaa Capital *Oro; Mauer 151 i aellnus Mmlmtn nor Rleft ol Way Manynr L„.g... m. Manai ot Analnry]j Marypn..nt Maim ivl props* Wanw rd 4iulnt Mum,/ [al ull gvram!. Hangar Toll�nnnolonT n.*. Amin[ Fund Budgets Budgetary Basis The Commission accounts for its budgeted governmental funds using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The basis of accounting is the same as the basis of budgeting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available to meet current year obligations. Revenues are considered to be available when they are guaranteed as to receipt, based on expenditure of funds (i.e., government matching funds), or certain to be received within 180 days of the end of the fiscal year. Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred; however, debt service expenditures are recorded when the payment is due. Total sources and uses by governmental fund type for the FY 2015/16 budget are shown in Chart 9. Chart 9 — Total Sources and Uses by Governmental Fund Type FY 2015/16 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00 10.00% " 0.00% Fund Structure General Fund 87% 82% - 1 5% 5% 4% Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds Debt Service Fund Total Sources Y Total Uses There are 31 funds (Chart 10) that account for the Commission's budgeted resources and are categorized into four governmental fund types: General fund, special revenue funds, capital projects funds, and debt service funds. All of the Commission's funds are budgeted. There are three funds reported in the General fund and 23 in the special revenue funds. Three capital projects funds are used to account for capital project expenditures financed with short- or long-term debt proceeds. In addition, the Commission has two debt service funds to account for debt - related activity. Chart 10 — Budgeted Funds Structure FY 2015/16 General Fund f * Administration * Rail Operations *Planning & Programming y Special Revenue Funds • 1989 Measure A • Western County •Highway •Rail r 2009 Measure •Western County *Highways *Local Streets & Roads *Public Transit •Specialized Transit •Bus Transit •Rail Transit •Commuter Assistance *New Corridors *Bond Financing *Regional Arterials *Economic Development *Coachella Valley • Highway & Regional Arterials • Local Streets& Roads •Specialized Transit •Palo Verde Valley • Local Streets & Roads • FSP •SAFE •Local Transportation Funds • State Transit Assistance •TUMF •Coachella Valley Rail • Other Agency Projects Fund Capital Projects Funds *Commercial Paper •Sales Tax Bonds •Toll Revenue Bonds J Debt Service Funds •Sales Tax Bonds •Toll Revenue Bonds General Fund Overview The General fund of the Commission is used to account for all activities not legally required or designated by Board action to be accounted for separately. For many public agencies, the General fund is the largest fund; however, it is less significant for the Commission. The Commission's largest revenue source is Measure A, a locally levied sales tax that legally must be accounted for separately in special revenue funds. In addition to Commission administration and general operations, other General fund activities include commuter rail maintenance and operations as well as planning and programming. The FY 2015/16 budget for the General fund is presented in Table 20, followed by a discussion of significant components of the budget. Table 20 - General Fund FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements Investment Income TOTAL Revenues $ 2,800,000 $ 2,900,000 $ 12,400 20,000 437,000 834,000 262,100 1,378,500 59,200 14,300 3,570,700 2,900,000 10,400 650,000 1,461,700 2,800 5,146,800 5,024,900 Expenditures Personnel Salaries and Benefits 3,627,500 4,056,100 3,779,800 Professional and Support Professional Services 1,885,000 3,246,200 2,827,100 Support Costs 2,489,500 3,972,700 3,077,700 TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 4,374,500 7,218,900 5,904,800 Projects and Operations Program Operations- General 1,605,900 2,145,700 1,359,800 Engineering 19,800 - - Construction - 1,250,000 1,250,000 Operating and Capital Disbursements 9,742,300 13,531,500 11,560,700 Special Studies 81,700 800,000 500,000 TOTAL Projects and Operations 11,449,700 17,727,200 14,670,500 Debt Service Principal Payments 12,900 Interest Payments 10,000 TOTAL Debt Service 22,900 Capital Outlay 32,300 745,000 466,800 TOTAL Expenditures 19,506,900 29,747,200 24,821,900 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (15,936,200) (24,600,400) (19,797,000) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 13,686,000 18,099,400 16,899,400 Transfers Out - (547,700) (200,000) Net Financing Sources (Uses) 13,686,000 17,551,700 16,699,400 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) (2,250,200) (7,048,700) (3,097,600) Beginning Fund Balance 12,840,300 10,590,100 10,590,100 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 10,590,100 $ 3,541,400 $ 7,492,500 $ 3,000,000 4,000,000 841,200 875,000 11,100 8,727,300 4,433,200 3,569,000 5,248,100 8,817,100 2,696,300 500,000 19,545,000 1,764,000 24,505,300 293,500 38,049,100 (29,321,800) 26,344,300 (57,900) 26,286,400 (3,035,400) 7,492,500 $ 4,457,100 $ 100,000 3% 3,980,000 19900% 7,200 1% (503,500) -37% (3,200) -22% 3,580,500 70% 377,100 9% 322,800 10% 1,275,400 32% 1,598,200 22% 550,600 26% N/A (750,000) -60% 6,013,500 44% 964,000 121% 6,778,100 38% N/A N/A N/A (451,500) -61% 8,301,900 28% (4,721,400) 19% 8,244,900 46% 489,800 -89% 8,734,700 50% 4,013,300 -57% (3,097,600) -29% $ 915,700 26% The sources for the General fund (Chart 11) consist of allocations from Measure A sales tax revenues; various other federal, state and local reimbursements for planning activities and commuter rail station maintenance; investment income; transfers from LTF, TUMF, and motorist assistance for administration; transfers of LTF sales tax revenues for planning, programming, and monitoring (PPM) activities; and transfers of LTF Article 4 allocations for commuter rail transit operations and capital. Chart 11— General Fund Sources FY 2015/16 Transfers In 75 % Measure A Sales Tax 9% Federal Reimbursements 11% State Reimbursements 2% Local Reimbursements 3% Measure A sales tax revenues allocated for administration of $3,000,000 has increased 3% compared to the prior year to offset increased expenditures. The administrative allocation may be adjusted at mid -year based on required expenditures, but in no event will exceed four percent (4%) of total Measure A revenues (including administrative salaries and benefits). Federal reimbursements represent funding for Perris Valley Line stations' operation. State reimbursements include STIP funds for PPM activities. Local reimbursements from other local agencies are related to rail station security and traffic signal coordination. LTF sales tax revenues from the Local Transportation Fund, a special revenue fund, are allocated and transferred to the General fund for administration, planning and programming, and rail transit operations and capital for the following purposes: • Administration allocations from LTF sales tax revenues of $900,000 in FY 2015/16 have increased $50,000 compared to the prior year to offset increased expenditures. • Planning allocations are set by law at three percent (3%) of estimated LTF sales tax revenues. The FY 2014/15 revised budget of $2,721,400 includes the effect of the mid -year projection adjustment. This adjustment usually includes the unapportioned carryover amount, which is not determined until after the prior year's fiscal year end, and revised revenue projections. The FY 2015/16 budget for planning allocations is $2,490,000. • Transit funding for commuter rail, which is tied to sales tax revenues, is based on operating and capital needs to the extent that revenues and reserved fund balance are available. The FY 2015/16 budget includes $19,759,500 in LTF allocations primarily to fund operating contribution expenditures to SCRRA, rail station operations and maintenance, and rail studies. • The FY 2015/16 budget includes LTF allocations of $2,000,000 for grade separation projects. Administrative transfers in from TUMF and motorist assistance of $1,194,800 in FY 2015/16 increased slightly from $1,082,900 in FY 2014/15. Chart 12 — General Fund Uses FY 2015/16 Transfers Out 0% Capital Outlay 1% Personnel Salaries and Benefits 12% Professional Services 9% General fund uses are depicted in Chart 12. Personnel salaries and benefits expenditures increased 9% because of a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by the employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs increased 10% due to increased professional services for information technology consultants and rail planning and station development in the Coachella Valley. Support costs increased 32% due to increased station maintenance and operations, utilities, and security at the new Perris Valley Line stations. Projects and operations expenditures increased 38% because of increased program operations expenditures related to new Perris Valley Line station operations, operating contribution to SCRRA, and strategic assessment plan. The FY 2015/16 operating and capital disbursements budget includes no allocation for rail capital contributions and $2,000,000 for grade separation projects. Capital outlay expenditures decreased 61% due to cyclical station maintenance improvements. Transfers out include $50,000 related to a toll organizational study and $7,900 for an allocation of personnel costs related to administration of the 2009 Measure A local streets and roads program. Special Revenue Funds Overview The Commission's special revenue funds are legally restricted as to use for Measure A projects and programs, TUMF projects, motorist assistance services, other agency project coordination, and funding transit operations and capital in the County. The special revenue funds' budgets are summarized in Table 21, and individual budgets are presented in Tables 22 through 29 along with respective discussions. Table 21— Special Revenue Funds FY 2014 — 2016 FY 13/14 Actual Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues FY 14/15 Revised Budget $ 153,555,800 $ 77,544,200 14,409,400 35,533,600 82,360,200 1,315,400 11,284,400 1,081,100 2,914,700 164,100,000 81,500,000 12,944,700 80,564,400 91,669,000 5,082,500 12,154,600 575,000 952,200 379,998,800 449,542,400 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Budget $ 164,100,000 81,500,000 12,944,700 64,888,100 59,978,500 3,873,100 12,042,700 221,200 491,900 400,040,200 Expenditures Personnel Salaries and Benefits 3,249,900 4,274,200 4,491,400 Professional and Support Professional Services 10,678,400 12,564,900 9,679,500 Support Costs 816,000 1,894,700 1,193,900 TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 11,494,400 14,459,600 10,873,400 Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 13,835,700 19,608,600 Engineering 12,784,200 17,909,000 Construction 90,668,700 241,085,200 Design Build 157,564,700 255,303,500 Right of Way/Land 91,297,400 186,945,900 Operating and Capital Disbursements 79,902,000 126,212,800 Special Studies 35,500 420,000 Local Streets and Roads 46,677,100 49,882,000 Regional Arterials 13,902,700 30,400,000 TOTAL Projects and Operations 506,668,000 927,767,000 Capital Outlay 33,000 3,105,000 TOTAL Expenditures 521,445,300 949,605,800 647,683,100 15,908,500 10,203,700 158,376,000 227,943,000 65,715,300 80,980,000 207,000 49,882,000 22,397,800 631,613,300 705,000 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (141,446,500) (500,063,400) (247,642,900) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 235,482,400 441,908,000 177,688,600 Transfers Out (40,598,300) (108,213,400) (81,558,100) TIFIA Loan Proceeds 116,059,000 Net Financing Sources (Uses) 194,884,100 333,694,600 212,189,500 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 53,437,600 (166,368,800) (35,453,400) Beginning Fund Balance 557,546,900 610,984,500 610,984,500 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 610,984,500 $ 444,615,700 $ 575,531,100 167,000,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 40,123,300 48,709,300 3,580,200 12,053,800 235,000 897,400 368,971,400 5,066,600 12,732,000 1,757,100 14,489,100 17,852,000 18,094,900 150,562,600 284,681,200 105,312,400 130,018,500 80,000 50,679,000 30,600,000 787,880,600 3,500,000 810,936,300 (441,964,900) 54,504,700 (89,542,500) 261,277,900 226,240,100 (215,724,800) 575,531,100 $ 359,806,300 Dollar Percent Change Change $ 2,900,000 2% 1,500,000 2% 427,700 3% (40,441,100) -50% (42,959,700) -47% (1,502,300) -30% (100,800) -1% (340,000) -59% (54,800) -6% (80,571,000) -18% 792,400 19% 167,100 1% (137,600) -7% 29,500 0% (1,756,600) -9% 185,900 1% (90,522,600) -38% 29,377,700 12% (81,633,500) -44% 3,805,700 3% (340,000) -81% 797,000 2% 200,000 1% (139,886,400) -15% 395,000 13% (138,669,500) -15% 58,098,500 -12% (387,403,300) 18,670,900 261,277,900 -88% -17% N/A (107,454,500) -32% (49,356,000) 30% (35,453,400) -6% $ (84,809,400) -19% Measure A and LTF sales taxes, STA allocations, Western County TUMF, state budgetary allocations, and vehicle registration fees are all accounted for in the 23 special revenue funds. Federal, state, and local reimbursements and transfers in consisting principally of debt proceeds are used to supplement the Measure A sales tax revenues. Chart 13 illustrates the various special revenue fund sources. Chart 13 — Special Revenue Funds Sources FY 2015/16 Transfers In 8% STA Sales Tax 2% I_Federal Reimbursements 6% State Reimbursements 7% TUMF Revenue Local Reimbursements 2% 1% The special revenue funds' resources are expended on County highway, rail, regional arterial, and new corridors engineering, right of way acquisition, construction, and design build; local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction; economic development incentives; bond financing; bicycle and pedestrian facilities; education and incentive programs to encourage use of alternate modes of transportation; special social service transportation programs; public transit operations and capital needs; and motorist towing and freeway call box assistance. As shown in Chart 14, projects and operations expenditures represent the primary use of special revenue fund resources. Chart 14 — Special Revenue Funds Uses FY 2015/16 Personnel Salaries and Benefits 1% Professional Services r 1% LII Support Costs 0% Transfers N10at % Projects and Operations 88% Measure A Special Revenue Funds Of the special revenue funds, 16 are funded primarily with Measure A sales tax revenue, which is allocated to the three geographic areas of the County (Chart 15). The Measure A funds are comprised of two 1989 Measure A and ten 2009 Measure A Western County operating funds, three 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley operating funds, and one 2009 Measure A Palo Verde Valley operating fund. Chart 15 — Measure A Sales Tax Revenues by Geographic Area Palo Verde Valley 1% I I Coachella Valley 23% Western County 76% RryF� Since the 1989 Measure A terminated on June 30, 2009, the remaining 1989 Measure A Western County operating funds will be closed upon the completion of the specific highway and rail projects. With the commencement of the 2009 Measure A on July 1, 2009, the 14 operating funds will be in existence for the 30-year term. These funds account for all Measure A project and program expenditures and transfers of debt service for capital projects. The Measure A special revenue funds expend monies on capital construction and improvements to highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, new corridors, and local streets and roads. Funding is also reserved for commuter assistance, public and specialized transit, and economic development incentives programs as well as bond financing costs. The Commission is a self-help county, and, as such on major highway projects, the Commission supplements the State's spending. Upon completion of most highway projects, Caltrans takes over the maintenance and operations of the projects. All revenues from the Measure A sales tax have been pledged as security for the Commission's senior sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper notes. Debt service on the bonds is recorded in the Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund, and most of the resources for the cash payments are provided through transfers out by the Measure A special revenue funds for the 2009 Measure A bonds. Western County Measure A Operating Funds The Western County Measure A Operating special revenue funds account for Western County's approximately 76% share of the Measure A sales tax. As demonstrated in Table 22, most of the Commission's reimbursements flow through these funds, since the sales tax leverages state and federal dollars. Table 22 - Western County Measure A Operating Funds FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Revised Budget FY 14/15 Projected FY 15/16 Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Sources Measure A Sales Tax Bond Financing Commuter Assistance Economic Development Incentives Highways Local Streets and Roads New Corridors Public Bus Transit Rail Regional Arterials Specialized Transit Total Measure A Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Transfers In TIFIA Loan Proceeds TOTAL Sources Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits Professional Services Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements Special Studies Local Streets and Roads TOTAL Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Transfers Out TOTAL Uses $ 9,316,700 1,725,300 1,380,200 35,196,400 33,471,100 12,767,300 2,493,100 7,039,300 10,351,900 2,199,800 $ 9,956,000 1,844,000 1,475,000 37,613,000 35,769,000 13,644,000 1,881,000 7,523,000 11,063,000 3,134,000 $ 9,956,000 1,844,000 1,475,000 37,613,000 35,769,000 13,644,000 1,881,000 7,523,000 11,063,000 3,134,000 115,941,100 35,576,600 74,230,600 1,038,100 171,300 1,081,100 1,248,900 224,964,100 454,251,800 2,876,100 9,452,400 516,100 10,799,600 8,977,300 74,314,800 157,564,700 83,594,400 4,861,100 35,500 32,768,800 123,902,000 80,560,400 87,644,000 4,449,100 154,600 575,000 486,800 419,583,800 717,355,700 3,624,800 10,841,800 1,402,000 15,851,900 5,577,000 211,674,200 255,303,500 177,694,000 13,649,800 270,000 35,018,000 123,902,000 64,887,600 55,926,200 2,989,600 42,700 221,200 152,300 173,578,000 116,059,000 537,758,600 3,795,600 8,204,100 748,400 12,414,400 4,086,900 145,447,200 227,943,000 59,472,900 10,970,300 207,000 35,018,000 372,916,200 33,000 26,096,600 715,038,400 3,105,000 83,974,400 495,559,700 705,000 60,615,300 411,890,400 817,986,400 569,628,100 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 42,361,400 $ (100,630,700) $ (31,869,500) $ 10,166,000 1,883,000 1,506,000 38,406,000 36,524,000 13,932,000 1,920,000 7,681,000 11,296,000 3,200,000 126,514,000 40,123, 300 44,967,300 1,641,900 53,800 235,000 406,400 47,306,900 261,277,900 522,526,500 4,451,500 10,235,300 811,300 13,606,000 13,347,500 138,429,300 284,681,200 84,725,800 18,770,000 80,000 35,752,000 589,391,800 3,500,000 56,159, 900 664,549,800 5 (142 023 3001 $ 210,000 39,000 31,000 793,000 755,000 288,000 39,000 158,000 233,000 66,000 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2,612,000 (40,437,100) (42,676,700) (2,807,200) (100,800) (340,000) (80,400) (372,276,900) 261,277,900 (194,829,200) 826,700 (606,500) (590,700) (2,245,900) 7,770,500 (73,244,900) 29,377,700 (92,968,200) 5,120,200 (190,000) 734,000 2% -50% -49 % -63% -65% -59% -17% -89 % N/A -27% 23% -6% -42 % -14% 139% -35 % 12% -52 % 38% -70% 2% (125,646,600) -18% 395,000 13% (27,814,500) -33% (153,436,600) -19% $ (41,392,600) 41% The budgeted Western County Measure A sales tax revenues reflect a 2% increase compared to the prior year due to Measure A sales tax projections. Taxable sales changes between jurisdictions within the County also periodically affect the geographic allocation formula from year to year. Federal reimbursements for highway and rail projects and the commuter assistance program, which are lower in the FY 2015/16 budget, relate to funding from the FTA, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), Surface Transportation Program (STP), and earmarks. The 50% decrease in federal reimbursements is primarily attributable to allocations of federal funding for project activity on the 91/71 interchange improvement, SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange, and Perris Valley Line projects in the previous fiscal year. State reimbursements are lower by 49% compared to the FY 2014/15 budget and reflect funding from STIP and Proposition 1B funding for various highway and rail projects, particularly the 1-215 corridor improvement project, rail station rehabilitation, and the Perris Valley Line, in the previous fiscal year. The local reimbursement decrease of 63% is attributable to the 91 Project and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. TUMF revenue represents reimbursements from TUMF zone funds administered by WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange construction, and the decrease in these TUMF reimbursements reflects the substantial completion of the project. Other revenue is related to property management lease revenues, which reflects a decrease from the prior year and is related to properties acquired in connection with the 91 Project. Investment income is lower compared to the previous year's budget due to lower ending projected cash balances resulting from the construction on the Perris Valley Line, 1-215 corridor improvement project, and the 91 Project; engineering and right of way acquisition on the Mid County Parkway; and right of way acquisition on the 91 Project. As in prior years, a significant portion of transfers in consists of debt proceeds of $46,477,000 from sales tax revenue bonds and toll revenue bonds to fund the 91 Project. Other significant transfers in include $50,000 from the General fund for toll organization planning; $7,900 from the General fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads fund for salaries and benefits; and $772,000 for regional arterials in accordance with the 2009 Measure A related to a city not eligible to receive the local street and roads funds. TIFIA loan proceeds of $261,277,900 will be used to pay eligible 91 Project expenditures. Personnel salaries and benefits expenditures increased 23% resulting from the addition of three full-time equivalents to include a new Toll Senior Management Analyst, Toll Technology Manager, and Toll Operations Manager in preparation for toll operations that will commence in 2017, a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by the employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs, a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases, and the allocation of FTEs. Measure A Western County professional services expenditures in FY 2015/16 consist of general legal services for the various programs and capital projects, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the 91 Project and 1-15 Express Lanes project, other professional services for rail capital and commuter assistance projects, and professional fees related to the Commission's debt programs. The decrease of 6% in FY 2015/16 reflects the previous year activity in advisory services and legal services related to the 91 Project, and SR-91 HOV lanes project, and rail service easement activities in preparation for the commencement of commuter rail service on the Perris Valley Line. Support costs decreased 42% due to restructuring of printing, communications, and vehicle maintenance for the commuter assistance program. Support costs comprise operations for the highway and rail capital, commuter assistance program, and property management services. General program operations comprise the program management with outside consultants for the highway and rail capital and commuter assistance programs, permits required for capital projects, and subsidies and certificates for the commuter assistance program. Such levels of operations typically fluctuate as project activities transition to another phase. Many of the Commission's Western County rail and highway projects funded by Measure A have been in the project development phase for several years and are now complete or in the engineering and design -build phase. Accordingly, engineering expenditures and design -build activities are expected to increase 139% and 12%, respectively, while construction and right of way activities are anticipated to decrease 35% and 52%, respectively. Major projects still in the construction and/or right of way phase but at a decreased level of costs include the 91 Project, 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment), and Perris Valley Line. Several Western County TUMF regional arterial projects will be under construction in FY 2015/16. In addition to the design -build and construction activities of the 91 Project, other related design -build activities during FY 2015/16 include utility and railroad relocations and the interagency, legal, financial, and other consultant staff to support these activities. Right of way acquisition is another major project activity for which the process can be lengthy. Significant right of way acquisitions will benefit the 91 Project, SR-91 HOV lanes, 91/71 interchange improvement, Mid County Parkway, Perris Valley Line, and various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects. Operating and capital disbursements are higher by 38% compared to the FY 2014/15 budget and relate to Western County intercity bus service and specialized transit expenditures funded by Measure A. Special studies includes a toll operations study. Local streets and roads comprise turn back payments to local jurisdictions and increased as a result of the higher Measure A sales tax revenues. Capital outlay includes equipment and improvements for the rail and commuter assistance programs and reflects a 13% increase due to station rehabilitation projects. Significant transfers out include funding for debt service payments of $27,451,800; contribution of $11,000,000 from the 1989 Measure A Western County highway fund and $16,776,600 from the 2009 Measure A Western County new corridors fund to the Sales Tax Bonds capital projects fund for the 91 Project equity contribution; funding for rail operating needs of $159,500 from 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund; and 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads fund allocation of $772,000 to 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterials fund. Coachella Valley Measure A Operating Funds These special revenue funds account for Coachella Valley's 23% share of the Measure A sales tax. Table 23 — Coachella Valley Measure A Operating Funds FY 2014 — 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Highways & Regional Arterials $ 18,235,700 $ 19,488,000 $ 19,488,000 Local Streets and Roads 12,765,000 13,642,000 13,642,000 Specialized Transit 5,470,700 5,846,000 5,846,000 Total Measure A 36,471,400 38,976,000 38,976,000 Investment Income 143,000 24,500 7,800 Transfers In 188,100 21,900 - TOTAL Sources 36,802,500 39,022,400 38,983,800 Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits 300 21,800 200 Professional Services 4,000 Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 23,700 11,400 9,400 Operating and Capital Disbursements 5,217,000 6,858,300 5,846,000 Local Streets and Roads 12,765,000 13,642,000 13,642,000 Regional Arterials 12,719,300 30,000,000 21,797,800 TOTAL Projects and Operations 30,725,000 50,511,700 41,295,200 TOTAL Uses 30,725,300 50,537,500 41,295,400 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 6,077,200 $ (11,515,100) $ (2,311,600) $ 19,661,000 13,763,000 5,898,000 39,322,000 51,000 39,373,000 3,200 4,000 7,800 6,298,000 13,763,000 30,000,000 50,068,800 50,076,000 < tin 7nq nnm $ 173,000 1% 121,000 1% 52,000 1 346,000 1% 26,500 108% (21,900) -100% 350,600 1% (18,600) -85% 0% (3,600) -32% (560,300) -8% 121,000 1% O% (442,900) -1% (461,500) -1% 812,100 -7% As shown in Table 23, overall budgeted Coachella Valley Measure A sales tax revenues increased 1% due to Measure A sales tax revenue projections. Taxable sales changes among the geographic areas also impact the geographic allocation formula from year to year. The Coachella Valley operating and capital disbursements represent specialized transit funds distributed to SunLine for transit operations. Local streets and roads comprise turn back payments to local jurisdictions and are directly affected by changes in Measure A sales tax revenues. Regional arterial projects are highway and regional arterial projects managed by CVAG. Debt service funding for CVAG highway and regional arterial and the city of Indio local streets and roads projects under advance funding agreements is reflected in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the financial system. Palo Verde Valley Measure A Operating Fund This special revenue fund accounts for Palo Verde Valley's 1% share of the Measure A sales tax. Table 24 — Palo Verde Valley Measure A Operating Fund FY 2014 — 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Measure A Sales Tax Local Streets and Roads $ 1,143,300 $ 1,222,000 $ 1,222,000 $ 1,164,000 $ (58,000) -5% Transfers In 4,000 (4,000) -100% TOTAL Sources 1,143,300 1,226,000 1,222,000 1,164,000 (62,000) -5% Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits 4,000 (4,000) -100% Projects and Operations Local Streets and Roads 1,143,300 1,222,000 1,222,000 1,164,000 (58,000) -5% TOTAL Projects and Operations 1,143,300 1,222,000 1,222,000 1,164,000 (58,000) -5% TOTAL Uses 1,143,300 1,226,000 1,222,000 1,164,000 (62,000) -5% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ N/A The Measure A sales tax revenues are affected by the impact of shifts in taxable sales changes on the geographic allocation formula as well as revenue projections. In the Palo Verde Valley as noted in Table 24, expenditures are for local streets and roads. Debt service funding for the city of Blythe local streets and roads projects under an advance funding agreement is reflected in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the financial system. Non -Measure A Special Revenue Funds The non -Measure A special revenue funds account for LTF disbursements; TUMF Western County project costs; motorist assistance expenditures for towing service, freeway call boxes, and 1E511 system operations; transit disbursements from STA; Coachella Valley rail planning and development, and interagency activities. These activities are budgeted in the LTF, TUMF, FSP and SAFE, STA, Coachella Valley Rail, and Other Agency Projects special revenue funds, respectively. Local Transportation Fund The LTF special revenue fund derives its revenue from one quarter of one cent of the state sales tax that is returned to source and provides for funding of public transit operations in the County, bicycle and pedestrian facility projects, planning, and administration (Table 25). Table 25 — Local Transportation Fund FY 2014 — 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources LTF Sales Tax Local Reimbursements Investment Income TOTAL Sources Uses Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements Transfers Out TOTAL Uses $ 77,544,200 $ 81,500,000 $ 81,500,000 3,100 486,200 256,300 193,100 78,030,400 81,756,300 81,696,200 54,943,100 78,155,300 59,325,200 12,452,900 16, 607, 000 16,320,500 67,396,000 94,762,300 75,645,700 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 10,634,400 $ (13,006,000) $ 6,050,500 $ 83,000,000 243,200 83,243,200 82,670,500 24,990,000 107,660,500 $ (24,417,300) $ 1,500,000 2% N/A (13,100) -5% 1,486,900 2% 4,515,200 6% 8,383,000 50% 12,898,200 14% $ (11,411,300) 88% The LTF sales tax revenue in FY 2015/16 is projected to increase 2% from the prior year. Investment income is expected to decrease slightly. In FY 2015/16, approximately 82% and 18% of the LTF transit expenditures of $80,050,000 are for operating and capital purposes, respectively. LTF operating allocations are comprised of 78% to Western County, 19% to Coachella Valley, and 3% to Palo Verde Valley public bus operators. The actual allocations will not be approved until July 2015. Other operating and capital disbursements include allocations for SB821 bicycle and pedestrian projects of $1,986,000 and planning and administration allocations of $634,500 to the County Auditor -Controller and SCAG. Transfers out include allocations to the Commission's General fund for planning and administration of $3,390,000, rail operations and station maintenance of $19,600,000, and grade separation projects of $2,000,000. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund The TUMF fund accounts for the Commission's share of developer fee assessments on new residential and commercial developments in Western County for regional arterials and CETAP corridors (Table 26). TUMF revenue is projected to remain unchanged based on the recovering housing market. The transfers in for FY 2015/16 relate to funding from TUMF CETAP of $6,436,600 for the city of Temecula's regional arterial projects along 1-15. Table 26 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Federal Reimbursements $ (43,200) $ $ TUMF Revenue 11,113,100 12,000,000 12,000,000 Investment Income 717,500 65,300 15,000 Transfers In 9,413,800 21,633,600 2,782,400 TOTAL Sources 21,201,200 33,698,900 14,797,400 Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits Professional Services Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Engineering Construction Right of Way/Land Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL Uses Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses 258,900 342,300 469,000 693,500 350,300 198,000 700 11,300 9,500 453,400 438,700 371,300 3,748,500 12,132,000 5,766,800 16,353,900 28,761,000 12,859,300 7,703,000 9,251,900 6,242,400 1,183,400 400,000 600,000 29,442,200 50,983,600 25,839,800 793,900 6,264,300 3,254,600 31,189,200 57,951,800 29,770,900 $ (9,988,000) $ (24,252,900) $ (14,973,500) 12,000,000 39,800 6,436,600 18,476,400 347,700 592,800 12,000 520,200 4,407,400 10,683,300 20,486,600 600,000 36,697,500 7,216,900 44,866,900 $ (26,390,500) $ N/A 0% (25,500) -39% (15,197,000) -70% (15,222,500) -45% 5,400 2% 242,500 69% 700 6% 81,500 19% (7,724,600) -64% (18,077,700) -63% 11, 234,700 121 % 200,000 50% (14,286,100) -28% 952,600 15% (13,084,900) -23% (2,137,600) 9% Personnel salaries and benefits have increased 2% due to 2% cost of living adjustments offset by employees' contributions for their share of normal pension costs and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services have increased 69% due to legal services expected on the Mid County Parkway. Projects and operations costs decreased 28%, as many regional arterial projects move into various stages of engineering, right of way acquisition and construction. Approximately 45% of the projects and operations costs are attributable to programmed regional arterial projects. The remaining 55% relates to CETAP projects such as the Mid County Parkway preliminary engineering and right of way acquisitions. Transfers out represent administrative allocations of $780,300 to the General fund and CETAP funding of $6,436,600 for two city of Temecula regional arterial projects along 1-15, which are within the CETAP Winchester to Temecula corridor limits. Freeway Service Patrol Fund The FSP fund accounts for the state and local resources provided to cover the costs of servicing stranded motorists in covered service areas and construction zones by means of towing, changing tires, and providing fuel (Table 27). The State's funding share of $2,042,000 has decreased 16% from the FY 2014/15 budget due to decreased CHP support needed for highway construction projects. Local reimbursements of $1,060,000 include construction freeway service patrol for the 91 Project. Transfers in represent Commission match funds of $571,200 from the SAFE special revenue fund. Table 27 - Freeway Service Patrol Fund FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Actual Revised Budget FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Sources Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources $ 100 2,131,400 1,100 4,000 916,400 $ 2,000 2,425,000 600 1,400 548,700 $ 500 2,452,300 600 200 548,700 3,053,000 2,977,700 3,002,300 Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits 76,900 101,600 103,900 Professional Services 36,000 71,000 77,000 Support Costs 25,500 59,400 61,700 Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 2,480,200 3,196,600 3,003,400 Transfers Out 170,800 194,200 194,200 TOTAL Uses 2,789,400 3,622,800 3,440,200 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 263,600 $ (645,100) $ (437,900) $ 2,042,000 1,060,000 1,800 571,200 3,675,000 86,900 66,000 49,300 3,557,500 248,300 4,008,000 $ (333,000) $ (2,000) (383,000) 1,059,400 400 22,500 -100% -16% 176567% 29% 4% 697,300 23% (14,700) (5,000) (10,100) 360,900 54,100 385,200 -14% -7% -17% 11% 28% 11% $ 312,100 -48% Personnel salaries and benefits have decreased 14% due to the allocation of FTEs. Professional services and support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Operating costs for towing services in FY 2015/16 are higher than FY 2014/15 budget due to increased support levels needed on the 91 Project. Transfers out are administrative allocations to the General fund. Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund The SAFE fund accounts for the $1 per vehicle registration fee levied by the State on all registered vehicles within the County. It funds the installation and implementation of emergency aid call boxes located strategically on the highways throughout the County as well as the operations of the 1E511 system (Table 28). Table 28 - Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Actual Revised Budget FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Sources Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements Investment Income TOTAL sources Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits Professional Services Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations - General Transfers Out TOTAL Uses $ 100 1,798,200 276,200 34,600 $ 2,000 $ 1,600,000 382,800 14,400 1,600,000 379,800 1,700 2,109,100 1,999,200 1,981,500 37,700 489,600 273,600 78,800 1,084,100 99,600 66,600 650,400 650,400 403,500 373,400 100,000 100,000 707,500 707,500 1,963,800 1,961,000 1,897,900 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 145,300 $ 38,200 $ 83,600 1,700,000 378,300 15,200 2,093,500 81,800 673,900 880,800 95,000 737,400 2,468,900 $ (375,400) (2,000) 100,000 (4,500) 800 -100% 6% -1% 6% 94,300 (17,800) 23,500 477,300 5% -18% 4% 118% (5,000) -5% 29,900 4% 507,900 26% $ (413,600) -1083% Local reimbursements represent the pass -through funds from SANBAG as its share of the 1E511 system operating costs and the recoveries from call box knockdowns, which service is provided by a collection agency. Personnel salaries and benefits have decreased 18% due to the allocation of FTEs. Professional services and support costs have increased due to increased call box hardware upgrades. Projects and operations costs are comparable to the previous year's budget. The transfers out reflect a matching contribution to the State's contribution for towing services of $571,200 to the FSP special revenue fund and administrative allocations to the General fund of $166,200. State Transit Assistance Fund The STA fund accounts for the state budgetary allocation of gas tax revenues designated for rail and bus transit operations and capital requirements (Table 29). The allocation is based on estimates of diesel fuel sales tax revenues provided by the Controller of the State of California, subject to an annual state budget appropriation. Table 29 - State Transit Assistance Fund FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources STA Sales Tax $ 14,409,400 $ 12,944,700 $ 12,944,700 $ 13,372,400 $ 427,700 3% Investment Income 280,900 96,500 118,200 135,400 38,900 40% TOTAL Sources 14,690,300 13,041,200 13,062,900 13,507,800 466,600 4% Uses Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements Transfers Out TOTAL Uses 14,880,800 27,549,400 4,838,500 466,000 466,000 14,880,800 28,015,400 5,304,500 22,280,000 190,000 22,470,000 (5,269,400) -19% (276,000) -59% (5,545,400) -20% Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ (190,500) $ (14,974,200) $ 7,758,400 $ 18.962.200) $ 6,012,000 -40% Investment income is expected to increase because of decreased capital disbursements to operators compared to FY 2014/15. The operating and capital disbursements consist of allocations for bus capital purposes. In FY 2015/16, 56% of the allocations are in Western County, 43% in Coachella Valley, and 1% in Palo Verde Valley. Transfers out represent rail capital allocations to the Coachella Valley Rail fund. Similar to the LTF allocations, the actual STA allocations will not be approved until July 2015. Coachella Valley Rail Fund The Coachella Valley Rail fund accounts for state funding for the planning and development of the new Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service (Table 30). Table 30 - Coachella Valley Rail Fund FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources State Reimbursements $ 4,200,000 $ - $ Investment Income (400) 7,000 3,600 Transfers In 116,000 779,500 TOTAL Sources 4,199,600 123,000 783,100 Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits 30,100 53,100 Professional Services 6,900 607,400 550,000 Support Costs 100 8,500 900 Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 10,000 Engineering 58,400 200,000 Construction 650,000 TOTAL Projects and Operations 58,400 860,000 TOTAL Uses 65,400 1,506,000 604,000 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 4,134,200 $ (1,383,000) $ 179,100 Transfers in of $190,000 reflect STA allocations. 4,500 190,000 194,500 60,600 1,160,000 3,700 10,000 250,000 1,200,000 1,460,000 2,684,300 $ (2,489,800) N/A (2,500) -36% 74,000 64% 71,500 58% 30,500 101 % 552,600 91% (4,800) -56% 0% 50,000 25% 550,000 85% 600,000 70% 1,178,300 78% (1,106,800) 80% Personnel salaries and benefits increased 101% because of increased FTE allocations for coordination of rail corridor activities; 2% cost of living adjustments offset by the employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional services and projects and operations represent exploring passenger rail options and conducting detailed studies on the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass rail corridor. Other Agency Projects Fund The fund accounts for interagency cooperative planning and development of projects in Riverside County. The Commission entered into a MOU with the Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District (District) for the Santa Ana River Trail project. The project is a joint effort with several public and private agencies including the counties of Orange and San Bernardino. The District is the lead agency for environmental compliance for NEPA and CEQA, and the Commission will be responsible for project oversight and approval, final design, and construction. Table 31- Other Agency Projects Fund FY 2014 - 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Local Reimbursements Investment Income TOTAL Sources - $ 250,000 $ 500,000 250,000 500,000 Uses Personnel Salaries and Benefits 50,000 3,000 Professional Services 40,000 Support Costs 10,000 Projects and Operations Program Operations - General 10,000 Engineering 350,000 Construction 69,500 Right of Way/Land Special Studies 150,000 TOTAL Projects and Operations 150,000 429,500 TOTAL Uses 250,000 432,500 Excess (deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ $ 67,500 $ 500,000 100 500,100 34,900 55,500 90,000 250,000 100,000 495,500 530,400 $ (30.300) $ 250,000 100% 100 N/A 250,100 100% (15,100) -30% (40,000) -100% (10,000) -100% 55,500 N/A 90,000 N/A 250,000 N/A 100,000 N/A (150,000) -100% 345,500 230% 280,400 112% $ (30,300) N/A The District is responsible for 100% of the Santa Ana River Trail project costs. It will reimburse the Commission, including providing an advance deposit, for all salaries and benefits, project management, engineering, and construction costs. Capital Projects Funds Overview The capital projects funds account for all debt proceeds from commercial paper notes, sales tax and toll revenue bonds, and TIFIA loan drawdowns (Table 32). Table 32 - Capital Projects Funds FY 2014 — 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Investment Income TOTAL Revenues $ 4,048,800 $ 592,100 $ 1,868,800 4,048,800 Expenditures Professional and Support Professional Services 300,000 Debt Service Principal Payments 60,000,000 Interest Payments 800 Cost of Issuance 7,050,900 592,100 1,868,800 TOTAL Debt Service 67,051,700 TOTAL Expenditures 67,351,700 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (63,302,900) 592,100 1,868,800 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 60,002,000 40,000,000 32,793,400 Transfers Out (438,433,900) (417,900,000) (172,277,000) Debt Proceeds 638,854,600 TIFIA Loan Proceeds - 191,600,000 Bond Premium 38,328,800 Bond Discount (2,433,300) Net Financing Sources (Uses) 296,318,200 (186,300,000) (139,483,600) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 233,015,300 (185,707,900) (137,614,800) Beginning Fund Balance 40,574,200 ENDING FUND BALANCE 273,589,500 273,589,500 $ 273,589,500 $ 87,881,600 $ 135,974,700 $ 879,500 879,500 879,500 27,776,600 (46,477,000) (18, 700,400) (17,820,900) 135,974,700 $ 118,153,800 287,400 49% 287,400 49% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 287,400 49% (12,223,400) -31% 371,423,000 -89% N/A (191,600,000) -100% N/A N/A 167,599,600 -90% 167,887,000 -90% (137,614,800) -50% $ 30,272,200 34% As illustrated in the following charts, capital projects funds sources primarily consist of transfers in (Chart 16), and the significant uses of the capital projects funds are transfers out (Chart 17). In 2005, a commercial paper program was established to advance project development and land and right of way acquisition related to the 2009 Measure A projects. In FY 2013/14, the Commission issued $462.2 million in sales tax revenue bonds (2013 Sales Tax Bonds) and $176.7 million in toll revenue bonds (2013 Toll Bonds) and executed a $421.1 million federal TIFIA loan to finance the 91 Project. In FY 2013/14, a portion of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds was used to retire $60 million of outstanding commercial paper notes and fund capitalized interest, while a portion of the 2013 Toll Bonds was used to fund capitalized interest and a debt service reserve. A significant portion of the remaining proceeds of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds along with the 2013 Toll Bonds has and will be drawn upon to pay a portion of costs of the 91 Project. The TIFIA loan will be used to pay eligible 91 Project expenditures and is reflected in the Western County Measure A Operating Special Revenue Fund to be consistent with the accounting in the financial system beginning with FY 2014/15. Chart 16 — Capital Projects Funds Sources FY 2015/16 Investment Income 3% Transfers In 97% mm•-- Transfers in of $27,776,600 represent a portion of the required equity contribution for the 91 Project. It will be funded from the 1989 Measure A Western County highway fund and the 2009 Measure A Western County new corridor fund in FY 2015/16. Chart 17 — Capital Projects Funds Uses FY 2015/16 i Transfers Out 100% In FY 2015/16, sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds of $46,477,000 will be transferred out to the 2009 Measure A Western County Highway special revenue fund for the 91 Project. Debt Service Funds Overview Under the 2009 Measure A program, as amended by Measure K in November 2010, the Commission has the authority to issue sales tax revenue bonds subject to a debt limitation of $975,000,000. The Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund of the Commission is used to account for all activities related to the sales tax revenue bonds debt incurred by the Commission (Table 33). The Commission's largest single expenditure is debt service. The debt agreements require the trustees to hold all debt proceeds, a portion of the sales tax revenues and, upon commencement of toll operations in FY 2016/17, the toll revenues from the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and to segregate all funds into separate amounts. These monies are included in the restricted investments held by trustee in the capital projects funds and the debt service funds. Under the sales tax indentures, the Commission may use sales tax revenues for any lawful purpose related to the Riverside County TIP after the trustee has satisfied debt service requirements. Under the toll indentures, which include the TIFIA loan, the use of toll revenues is prescribed by a flow of funds to be administered by the trustee. In order to advance project development activities, the Commission established a commercial paper program in 2005. Periodically a portion of the commercial paper notes issued has been retired with sales tax revenue bonds including those bonds issued in 2009 (2009 Bonds), 2010 (2010 Bonds), and 2013 (2013 Sales Tax Bonds). Table 33 — Debt Service Funds FY 2014 — 2016 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Federal Reimbursements Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expenditures Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments TOTAL Expenditures $ 2,767,400 $ 2,767,000 $ 2,767,000 2,957,200 892,300 1,774,500 5,724,600 7,100,000 43,399,400 3,659,300 4,541,500 7,400,000 7,400,000 47,296,200 47,296,200 50,499,400 54,696,200 54,696,200 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (44,774,800) (51,036,900) (50,154,700) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess(deficiency)of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 172,817,300 (2,955,500) 169,861,800 26,653,700 26,653,700 26,653,700 26,653,700 125,087,000 Beginning Fund Balance 11,225,300 ENDING FUND BALANCE (24,383,200) (23,501,000) 136,312, 300 136,312,300 $ 136,312,300 $ 111,929,100 $ 112,811,300 $ 2,767,000 668,300 3,435,300 7,800,000 46,119,900 53,919,900 (50,484,600) 27,451,800 27,451,800 (23,032,800) 112,811,300 89,778,500 0% (224,000) -25% (224,000) -6% 400,000 5% (1,176,300) -2% (776,300) -1% 552,300 -1% 798,100 798,100 3% N/A 3% 1,350,400 -6% (23,501,000) -17% $ (22,150,600) -20% Reimbursements consist of federal cash subsidy payments related to the 2010 Series B designated as build America bonds (BABs). The BABs subsidy payments reflect a reduction due to federal sequestration cuts. Investment income is significantly lower than the previous fiscal year due to lower investment balances resulting from the use of sales tax and toll revenue bonds in FY 2015/16 for the 91 Project. Transfers in represent the primary source of funding for the debt service funds (Chart 18) and consist of funds from the 2009 Measure A Western County Highways and Bond Financing special revenue funds. In FY 2013/14, transfers in included proceeds from the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and 2013 Toll Bonds related to funding for capitalized interest as well as a debt service reserve for the 2013 Toll Bonds. Chart 18 — Debt Service Funds Sources FY 2015/16 Federal Reimbursements 9% r Investment Income 2% r Debt Service fund uses (Chart 19) consist of debt service on the sales tax and toll revenue bonds. Chart 19 — Debt Service Funds Uses FY 2015/16 Debt Service 100% i Revenues and Other Sources Total revenues and other sources are budgeted at $779,368,800, and consist of Measure A sales tax of $170,000,000, (or 22% of total sources); LTF sales tax of $83,000,000 (or 11% of total sources); STA revenues of $13,372,400 (or 2% of total sources); federal revenues of $46,890,300 (or 6% of total sources); state revenues, including vehicle registration fees, of $49,550,500 (or 6% of total sources); TUMF of $12,053,800 (or less than 2% of total sources); debt proceeds of $261,277,900 (or 33% of total sources); transfers in of $136,077,400 (or 18% of total sources) and other revenues of $7,146,500 (or less than 1% of total sources). The specific revenue funding sources are shown in Table 33. Table 34 — Revenues and Other Sources FY 2015/16 Sales Tax Department/Program Measure A LTF STA Federal State Local/Other Funding Sources Management Services $ 3,000,000 $ MEASURE A AND OTHER CAPITAL PROGRAMS Bond Financing 10,166,000 CETAP Economic Development 1,506,000 Highways 58,067,000 Local Streets and Roads 51,451,000 New Corridors 13,932,000 Rail 7,681,000 Regional Arterials 11,296,000 REGIONAL PROGRAMS Public and Specialized Transit 11,018,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 Planning and Programming Rail Station Maintenance/Operations - Commuter Assistance 1,883,000 - Motorist Assistance - - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Debt Proceeds Transfers In 6,888,000 13,050,000 35,619,800 31,917,300 4,900 21,700 6,015,100 8,600 1,929,200 141,400 472,000 6,049,300 402,900 664,000 1,004,900 4,000,000 177,200 376,400 382,500 - 1,318,600 3,742,000 1,455,300 261,277,900 136,077,400 TOTAL Funding Sources $ 170,000,000 $ 83,000,000 $ 13,372,400 $ 46,890,300 $ 49,550,500 $ 416,555,600 Revenues —Definitions and Background $ 3,004,900 10,187,700 6,015,100 1,514,600 79,934,200 51,451,000 14,073,400 75,690,100 17,345,300 107,793,300 1,668,900 4,553,600 3,584,100 5,197,300 261,277,900 136,077,400 $ 779,368,800 Measure A: Measure A is a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax that was first approved by Riverside County voters in 1988 and expired on June 30, 2009 after a 20-year term. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A through 2039. The 2009 Measure A is expected to raise more than $10 billion (in nominal dollars) during its lifespan. The amount raised by the Measure A levy has increased as the County and its economic base have grown during the past two decades, peaking in FY 2005/06 at $157 million. As a result of an economic slowdown, Measure A revenues decreased the subsequent five years but have since stabilized. Measure A revenues are projected to approximate $167,000,000 and $170,000,000 in FY 2014/15 and FY 2015/16, respectively. Measure A requires that all sales taxes collected may only be used for transportation purposes including administration and the construction, capital acquisition, maintenance, and operation of streets, roads, highways, including state highways and public transit systems and for related purposes. These purposes include expenditures for planning, environmental reviews, engineering and design costs, and related right of way acquisition. The Commission historically has obtained and updated Measure A revenue projections through a consultant for budget and strategic project planning purposes. The most recent economic forecast was completed in May 2015, and the Commission's sales tax services consultant provides Measure A revenue projections in connection with its quarterly sales tax analysis. Measure A revenue projections, based on such updates and other factors, for the next five fiscal years are presented in Chart 20 below. Chart 20 — Forecasted Measure A Sales Tax Revenues 2016 — 2020 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $- 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 The following additional assumptions were used in the development of the Commission's revenue forecast for FY 2015/16: • The Inland Empire economy will continue its recovery through FY 2015/16. • The State does not change mix of items subject to the sales tax from what has been included historically. • The relative sales and property tax rates of Riverside and surrounding counties do not change from historical levels. • Internet sales will have minimal impact on revenue. The Measure A sales tax revenue projections are considered in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan financing strategy. Geographic Allocation - Riverside County is comprised of three geographic areas: Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. The percentage of Measure A revenues allocated to each of these areas based on return to source is approximately 76% for Western County, 23% for Coachella Valley, and 1% for Palo Verde Valley (Chart 21). These percentages will experience some variations from year to year based on changes in levels of taxable sales among the geographic areas. Chart 21— Geographic Allocation of Measure A Revenues Palo Verde Valley 1% Coachella Valley 23% Program Allocation - The 2009 Measure A TIP defines the manner in which the sales tax revenues are to be spent, as presented in the Table 35. In Western County, public transit includes funding for specialized transit, commuter rail, intercity bus service, and commuter assistance. For the Coachella Valley, public transit includes specialized transit and public bus services. Table 35 - Program Allocation of 2009 Measure A Revenues Western County *Bond Financing -8% *Economic Development Incentives -1% *Highways - 30% *Local Streets and Roads - 29% *New Corridors -11% *Public Transit -12% *Regional Arterials -9% Coachella Valley •Highways and Regional Arterials -50% *Local Streets and Roads -35% *Public Transit-15% Palo Verde Valley *Local Streets and Roads-100% Local streets and roads allocations to the local jurisdictions within each geographic area are based on population (in Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling units (in Coachella Valley) and taxable sales. Based on the projected Measure A sales tax revenues of $170,000,000 for FY 2015/16, the geographic and program allocations are presented in Table 36. Table 36 - Geographic Allocation of Measure A Revenues by Program FY 2015/16 Program Administration Western County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Administration $ 3,000,000 $ $ $ $ 3,000,000 Bond Financing 10,166,000 10,166,000 Economic Development Incentives 1,506,000 1,506,000 Highways 38,406,000 38,406,000 Highways and Regional Arterials - 19,661,000 19,661,000 Local Streets and Roads 36,524,000 13,763,000 1,164,000 51,451,000 New Corridors 13,932,000 - 13,932,000 Public Transit 14,684,000 5,898,000 20,582,000 Regional Arterials 11,296,000 11,296,000 TOTAL $ 3,000,000 $ 126,514,000 $ 39,322,000 $ 1,164,000 $ 170,000,000 Local Transportation Fund: LTF, established in state law by the TDA, is funded through a one -quarter of one cent of the State's 8.00% sales tax. The intent of the legislation was to provide a dependable revenue stream for public transportation operations. Based upon an annual projection of LTF sales taxes that considers economic forecast revenue projections prepared by a consultant, local economic factors, and monthly receipt trends, the vast majority of LTF revenue in the County is allocated to the eight public transit operators, including the Commission for its share of Metrolink operations costs. Much like Measure A revenue, LTF had increased with the growth of the County and its economy until the recent economic recession and has stabilized in recent years. Revenues received from LTF are allocated for regional and local transportation planning, program administration, SB821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities projects, public bus transit, and rail transit, including the Commission for its share related to commuter rail operations in Western County. The Commission administers these funds on behalf of the County in a special revenue fund. State Transit Assistance: STA provides additional TDA state funding of transit operations and capital for urban counties, including the County's eight public transit operators. Sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels have historically generated the STA funding; however, recent legislation eliminated the tax on gasoline. State Transportation Improvement Program: Administered by Caltrans, the STIP is funded through state and federal gas tax dollars and is California's primary transportation fund. Dollars are allocated to each county based on a formula that takes into consideration population and highway centerline miles. Actual programming decisions for 75% of STIP dollars are made by local transportation agencies such as the Commission. STIP reimbursement estimates are based on budgeted expenditures for specific projects with STIP allocations approved by the CTC. Proposition 1B: In November 2006, the voters in California approved Proposition 1B, which funds various transportation programs from bonds issued by the State. Programs that are funded include Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), transit capital, STIP supplement, and Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF). CMIA and transit capital revenues for certain highway and rail projects nominated by the Commission and approved by the CTC are included in state reimbursement revenues. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Registration Fees: State law allows county SAFE agencies to impose a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations within the County to pay for call box purchases and operations; excess SAFE revenues may be used for 511 operations and as a match for FSP operations. The call boxes enable motorists to summon help should they encounter mechanical or emergency problems while on the road, whereas the 1E511 system provides real-time traffic and transit trip information available via the internet or telephone. Caltrans Freeway Service Patrol Allocations: Caltrans is the primary sponsor of the FSP and provides the majority of funding for the program, including towing services in construction zones. The State provides nearly 80% of the funding for the FSP program based on population, freeway miles, and level of congestion throughout the State. The Commission administers and implements the program along with the CHP and Caltrans. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality: The CMAQ program is federally funded and is targeted for transportation improvements in areas with air quality problems. This program pays for improvements that reduce congestion while improving air quality. The Commission has also used CMAQ dollars to include commuter assistance programs, signal interconnects, HOV lanes, and transit projects. CMAQ reimbursement estimates are based on budgeted expenditures for specific projects with CMAQ allocations. Federal Transit Administration: FTA funding is generally allocated annually by the federal government to urbanized areas and is based on calculated miles of service. On a reimbursement basis, the federal government provides funding for qualified capital investments in rail facilities, track, and vehicles. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee: In connection with the 2009 Measure A, the TUMF program was established in the Western County to provide additional funding for regional arterial projects. TUMF is administered by WRCOG. As a result of a MOU with WRCOG, the Commission will receive 48.7% of the TUMF revenues, which are divided equally between the regional arterial and CETAP programs. TUMF revenues maintained by WRCOG are allocated for regional arterial zone improvements and regional transit facilities. TUMF revenue estimates are based on monthly receipt trends and consideration of local housing and commercial construction activity in the County. Rail and Highway Licenses: The Commission owns parcels of land and right of way for highway, rail, and regional arterial projects in selected areas throughout the County. The ownership provides licensing and leasing opportunities for fiber-optic cable, advertising signs, and business tenants. The amount of funding received from the licenses and leases provides revenue to partially support the cost of owning and maintaining the Commission's land and facilities. Investment Income: The Commission has established a prudent investment policy for cash on hand that is intended to maximize return while providing absolute safeguards on principal and liquidity, as noted in Section 1. Interest earnings on the State and County investment pools are estimated at an interest rate of 0.25%. The earnings on funds held by the trustee for debt service and projects are assumed to be at 0.75%. Program Revenues and Other Sources Revenues and other financing sources for FY 2015/16 are allocated to the various Commission programs as follows: Management Services The primary funding sources for management services are Measure A allocations of $3,000,000 as well as LTF allocation transfers in of $900,000 and administration funding transfers in of $1,194,800 from TUMF, SAFE, and FSP. Other revenues include $500 for administrative activities. Interest revenues in FY 2015/16 are $4,400. Bond Financing Measure A Western County revenues of $10,166,000 will be used to support bond financing costs. Interest revenues are $21,700. CETAP The Western County CETAP program will receive $6,000,000 from TUMF for development of new CETAP corridors. Additionally, other local revenues include $15,100 representing investment income. Economic Development In order to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate in the Western County area, Measure A Western County revenues of $1,506,000 will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve and construct interchanges, provide public transit linkages or stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system. Interest earnings are $8,600. Highways Funding for the highway program includes 2009 Measure A sales tax revenues of $58,067,000 for Western County highways and Coachella Valley highways and regional arterials programs. The 2009 Measure A Western County sales tax revenues will be used primarily for the 91 Project, 1-15 Express Lanes project, and 1-215 corridor improvements. Unexpended 1989 Measure A Western County revenues from prior years will be used on remaining projects such as SR-74 widening from 1-15 to 7th Street and curve realignment, SR-91 HOV lanes, and 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors, and an equity contribution to the 91 Project. Federal funds for highway projects include $44,300 in demonstration funds for the 74/215 interchange, $1,942,000 in CMAQ funds for the SR-91 HOV lanes and $2,134,700 in demonstration funds for the 91/71 interchange improvements. Other federal funds include $2,767,000 for BABs subsidy payments related to the 2010 Bonds. State funds include STIP funding of $8,000,000 and Proposition 1B funding of $5,050,000 will be used on the 1-215 corridor improvements. Additional local funding includes $53,800 in TUMF zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange, $85,000 in lease revenues, $60,000 in carpool violations, $100,000 in 91 Project reimbursements, and interest revenue of $1,630,400. In FY 2015/16, the Commission anticipates the $261,277,900 in a federal TIFIA loan drawdown to fund the 91 Project. Transfers in include $46,477,000 in sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds to fund the 91 Project; $27,451,800 to the Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund for Measure A Western County and Coachella Valley highways debt service; $27,776,600 to the Sales Tax Bonds capital projects fund for an equity contribution from the 1989 Measure A Western County highway fund and the 2009 Measure A Western County new corridors fund to the 91 Project; and $50,000 from the General fund for toll organization planning. Local Streets and Roads Measure A allocations of $51,451,000 for the local streets and roads program are distributed to the cities and the County for local street repairs, maintenance, and construction. Transfers in include $7,900 from the General Fund for 2009 Measure A local street and roads salaries and benefit expenditures. New Corridors To leverage local, state, and federal funding for four new transportation corridors identified through CETAP, Measure A Western County revenues of $13,932,000 will be available for environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, and construction of these new corridors. Interest revenues of $141,400 are included in local revenues. Rail Unexpended 1989 Measure A Western County revenues will be used primarily for the Perris Valley Line and other rail capital projects. The 2009 Measure A Western County's public transit program allocated $7,681,000 for rail. Federal FTA funding for the Perris Valley Line project consists of $23,329,800 from CMAQ, $10,805,000 in federal FTA funding for station rehabilitation projects, and $1,485,000 in federal allocations for other rail projects. STIP revenues of $27,616,800 will fund the Perris Valley Line. State Transportation Enhancements revenues of $4,300,500 will fund station rehabilitation and security projects. Local revenues include investment income of $122,600, reimbursements of $199,400 related to the Perris Transit Center, and property management revenues of $150,000. Transfers in of $190,000 are from STA for the development of Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service. Regional Arterials The Western County regional arterial program will receive funds from Measure A and TUMF in the amounts of $11,296,000 and $6,000,000, respectively. The new TUMF revenues along with unexpended TUMF revenues from prior years will be the primary source of funding TUMF regional arterial projects. Other local revenues also consist of investment income of $49,300. Transfers in consist of $6,436,600 from TUMF CETAP as a match for TUMF regional arterial projects and $772,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads, in accordance with the 2009 Measure A, related to a city not eligible to receive those funds. Public and Specialized Transit LTF sales tax revenues of $83,000,000 are allocated primarily for public bus and rail transit operations and capital in the County. A small portion of these revenues is used for LTF planning and administration allocations as well as SB821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities grants. STA allocations of $13,372,400 are allocated to the County's public transit operators. For the FY 2015/16 budget, unexpended LTF and STA revenues from prior years will also be used to fund transit operations as well as bicycle and pedestrian facilities grants. Under the 2009 Measure A, public transit funding of $11,018,000 has been allocated for Western County specialized transit and intercity bus services and Coachella Valley specialized and public transit services. Local revenues represent investment income of $402,900. Planning and Programming Transportation planning studies are funded with a LTF off -the -top allocation transfer in of $2,490,000, or three percent of estimated LTF revenues. A LTF allocation transfer in of $2,000,000 will fund grade separation projects for the city of Corona. STIP in the amount of $664,000 will fund PPM activities of the Commission and CVAG. Local revenues consist of $500,000 for a traffic signal coordination project, $500,000 for the District project, and investment income of $4,900. Rail Station Maintenance and Operations Rail operations, which include Metrolink operating and capital contributions, station maintenance, and support, will be funded with LTF allocation transfers in of $19,600,000; transfers in of $159,500 in 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance funds are related to rail feasibility studies and Perris Transit Center operations. Federal CMAQ funding of $4,000,000 and state funding of $177,200 will fund Perris Valley Line start-up operations. In addition to interest revenues of $1,900, local revenues include $364,000 in reimbursements primarily from SCRRA for security costs, $3,000 for Metrolink violator citations, and $7,500 for miscellaneous vending machine revenues. Commuter Assistance The Commuter Assistance program will receive funding of $1,883,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County public transit to assist in implementing services to commuters and employers in promoting use of alternate modes of transportation in Western County. The Commission will also receive federal CMAQ funds of $232,500 and STP funds of $150,000 to support the commuter assistance program. Local revenues consist of other agency reimbursements of $1,282,500 for support of the San Bernardino commuter assistance program and regional ridematching as well as investment income of $36,100. Motorist Assistance SAFE is funded from $1,700,000 in revenues received through DMV registration fees, while Caltrans will allocate $2,042,000 in State highway account funds to cover FSP services. The Commission will also receive local revenues of $371,300 to support SANBAG's share of the 1E511 system operations, $1,060,000 in 91 Project reimbursements, investment income of $17,000, and cost recoveries of $7,000 from responsible parties related to call box knockdowns. The State's FSP contribution is matched with an operating transfer in from SAFE of $571,200. Commission Debt The Commission's current debt under the 2009 Measure A has been incurred for highway, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects for which title usually vests or, upon completion, will vest with Caltrans or local jurisdictions for ongoing operations and maintenance. Future Measure A sales taxes are pledged to cover Measure A debt service payments on the sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper notes. Future toll revenues generated on the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, which is part of the 91 Project, are pledged to pay debt service on the 2013 Toll Bonds and federal TIFIA loan. The Commission may also issue commercial paper notes for other 2009 Measure A projects. Since the financed projects are not assets of the Commission for which the Commission will have operating responsibilities, except for the intangible rights to operate the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, future operating costs related to these projects cannot be determined and are not applicable. However, for toll and rail assets, operating budget impacts are considered in future project development. Table 37 presents a summary of the anticipated changes in the Commission's debt during FY 2015/16. Table 37 — Changes in Commission Debt Projected Balance July 1, 2015 Additions Accretion Projected Balance (Reductions) June 30, 2016 Commercial Paper $ 2009 Sales Tax Bonds 2010 Sales Tax Bonds 2013 Sales Tax Bonds 2013 Toll Bonds TIFIA Loan Commercial Paper 146,900,000 150,000,000 462,200,000 176,654,600 - $ - - (7,800,000) - 261,277,900 $ 935,754,600 $ 261,277,900 $ (7,800,000) 139,100,000 150,000,000 462, 200, 000 176,654,600 261,277,900 $ 1,189,232,500 In March 2005 the Commission established a commercial paper program to advance project development and land and right of way acquisition under the 2009 Measure A TIP. In September 2013 the Commission reduced the commercial paper program from $120,000,000 to $60,000,000. Maturities of commercial paper notes are rolled over to new issuances of commercial paper. Regarding the commercial paper notes, the Commission currently maintains a P-1 and an A-1+ rating from Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) and Standard and Poor's Rating Service (S&P), respectively. Interest payments are made from available commercial paper proceeds or sales tax revenues. The Commission did not issue commercial paper notes in FY 2014/15 and does not anticipate the issuance of commercial paper notes in FY 2015/16. Accordingly, no commercial paper debt service expenditures are reflected in the Commercial Paper capital projects fund. The Commission has an irrevocable direct draw letter of credit in the amount of $60,750,000 and reimbursement agreement with State Street Bank and Trust Company (State Street Bank), which expires in October 2017, as credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper notes. The costs for the liquidity support are reflected in the 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing special revenue fund. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Under the provisions of the 2009 Measure A, the Commission has the authority to issue bonds subject to a bond debt limitation of $975,000,000, reflecting an increase from the original authorization of $500,000,000 as a result of the voter approval of Measure K in November 2010. The sales tax bonds are secured by a pledge of the 2009 Measure A revenues. All sales tax revenue bonds mature on or before June 2039, prior to the expiration of the 2009 Measure A. As a means to achieve a greater level of interest rate stability, the Commission entered into two interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $185,000,000 at a fixed rate for 20 years effective October 2009; the counterparties pay the Commission a floating rate equal to 67% of the one -month London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR. The counterparty for the first swap ($100,000,000 notional amount) at a fixed rate of 3.679% is Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America), and the counterparty for the second swap ($85,000,000 notional amount) at a fixed of 3.206% is Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank). As of June 30, 2016, the projected notional amounts for the Bank of America and Deutsche Bank swaps are $75,200,000 and $63,900,000, respectively. In connection with the commencement of the interest rate swaps in October 2009, the Commission issued $185,000,000 in variable rate sales tax revenue bonds to retire outstanding commercial paper notes, refund bonds issued in 2008, fund a portion of the debt service reserve, and pay costs of issuance. The 2009 Bonds are secured by standby bond purchase agreements (SBPAs) with The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (BTMU), which expire in March 2019. The costs for these liquidity facilities are accounted for in the 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing special revenue fund. For FY 2015/16, the Commission has budgeted debt service principal and interest payments of $7,800,000 and $5,428,400 respectively. In November 2010 the Commission issued $37,630,000 in fixed rate tax-exempt bonds (Series A Tax -Exempt) and $112,370,000 in fixed rate taxable bonds (Series B Taxable) designated as BABs under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The aggregate amount issued of $150,000,000 for the 2010 Bonds was used to retire outstanding commercial paper notes, provide funds for 2009 Measure A Western County capital projects, and pay costs of issuance. A portion of the BABs was designated as recovery zone economic development bonds (RZEDBs). The Commission expects to receive a cash subsidy from the United States Treasury equal to 35% of the interest payable on the BABs or 45% of the interest payable on the Series B Taxable bonds additionally designated as RZEDBs; however, in FY 2014/15, the BABs subsidy was reduced approximately 7.3% due to federal sequestration cuts, similar to the prior year. If sequestration continues, the FY 2015/16 BABs subsidy is expected to also be reduced by approximately 7.3%. Estimated net debt service payments for the 2010 Bonds in FY 2015/16 are $0 for principal and $9,530,500 for interest payments, which are offset by the $2,982,100 cash subsidy payment. In July 2013 the Commission issued $462,200,000 in fixed rate sales tax revenue bonds, at a premium, in connection with the 91 Project. The proceeds of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds were used to fund a portion of the costs of the 91 Project, retire outstanding commercial paper notes, pay capitalized interest through December 2017, and pay costs of issuance. Estimated debt service payments for the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds in FY 2015/16 are $0 for principal and $24,041,100 for interest payments. The Commission has received long-term debt ratings of Aa2, AA+, and AA from Moody's, S&P, and Fitch Ratings (Fitch), respectively on its currently outstanding sales tax revenue bonds. Toll Revenue Bonds and TIFIA Loan In July 2010 the Commission authorized the issuance of up to $900,000,000 in toll revenue bonds in anticipation of the financing requirements for the 91 Project. In July 2013 the Commission issued $176,654,600 in toll revenue bonds, at a discount, that consist of $123,825,000 in current interest bonds (CIBs) and $52,829,600 in capital appreciation bonds (CABS). The CIBs have maturity dates through June 2048, while the CABS have maturity dates commencing June 2022 through June 2043 at the accreted value. Estimated debt service payments for the 2013 Toll Bonds in FY 2015/16 are $0 for principal and $7,119,900 for interest payments. The 2013 Toll Bonds are secured by a lien on the trust estate, which consists primarily of toll revenues and account revenues less operating and maintenance expenses of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. As a result of an invitation in April 2012 from the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) and subsequent approval of the Commission's application, in July 2013 the Commission executed a federal TIFIA loan in an amount up to $421,054,400, which provided the final puzzle piece needed for the full funding of the 91 Project. The TIFIA loan is a toll revenue bond that is subordinate to the 2013 Toll Bonds unless and until the occurrence of a bankruptcy related event. Proceeds of the TIFIA loan may be drawn upon after certain conditions have been met. Interest on outstanding disbursements is 3.47% and is compounded semiannually. The TIFIA loan matures on the earlier of June 2051 and the date that is 35 years after the substantial completion date of the 91 Project, which is anticipated in January 2017. Interest payments commence on the fifth anniversary of the substantial completion date or the first interest payment date occurring prior to the fifth anniversary date. Accordingly, semiannual interest payments are anticipated to commence December 2021; principal payments commence annually in June 2030. The Commission is required to fund a $20,000,000 TIFIA debt service reserve no later than July 2019 from sale proceeds of excess land acquired for the 91 Project. The TIFIA loan is also secured by the trust estate, similar to the 2013 Toll Bonds. The 2013 Toll Bonds and the TIFIA loan received long-term ratings from S&P and Fitch of BBB-. Debt Capacity Analysis The Commission is legally prohibited from issuing additional sales tax revenue debt if its debt coverage ratio is less than 1.5 to 1 on all senior sales tax revenue debt. The Commission has adopted a higher standard of 2 to 1 as part of its debt management policy. As Chart 22 and Table 38 indicate, the Commission has successfully met its policy standard for sales tax revenue debt issued under the 2009 Measure A, even in a fluctuating sales tax revenue environment. The 1989 Measure A related debt consistently exceeded the Commission's standard, and coverage for the 2009 Measure A related debt of 3.9 is anticipated for FY 2015/16. Any coverage less than 2 to 1 would necessitate using other program funding to cover all debt service expenditures. Chart 22 — Measure A Debt Capacity Analysis $180,000,000 $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $- FY 2014/15 Table 38 — Measure A Debt Capacity Analysis FY 2015/16 �+ Senior Debt Service ■ Available Revenues FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Sales Tax Revenues Senior Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Senior Debt Long -Term Debt Rating Commercial Paper Rating 167,000,000 $ 170,000,000 44,809,300 $ 43,817,900 3.7 3.9 Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ As to the toll -supported debt consisting of the 2013 Toll Bonds as senior debt and the TIFIA loan as subordinate debt, the Commission is required to establish and collect tolls in connection with the toll road to produce net revenues equal to or in excess of the following ratios: • 150% on senior lien debt; • 130% on senior lien, second lien, and subordinate debt; and • 100% on outstanding debt plus reserve deposits and certain other funds established under the indenture. Toll operations are anticipated to commence in January 2017 upon substantial completion of the 91 Project. Aggregate Debt Service Schedule for Sales Tax Bonds Debt service requirements for the sales tax revenue bonds are based on amortization schedules for the 2009 Bonds; 2010 Bonds, including the BABs cash subsidy payments; and the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. Since commercial paper is expected to be refinanced with sales tax revenue bonds, debt service requirements for commercial paper are not included in Table 39; the Commission does not anticipate any outstanding commercial paper notes during FY 2015/16. Table 39 — Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2039 Total Principal $ 7,800,000 8,100,000 31,460,000 20,990,000 21,990,000 126, 575,000 158,405,000 192, 530,000 191, 250,000 Interest $ 39,000,000 39,077,600 38,759,300 37,277,400 36,334,000 165,611,900 132,977,700 89,483,700 28,388,900 Subsidy Payments $ (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (14, 910, 600) (14,910,600) (13,856,600) (5,098,700) Net Debt Service $ 759,100,000 $ 606,910,500 $ (63,687,000) Outstanding Debt and Debt Service Requirements as of June 30, 2016 $ 43,817,900 44,195, 500 67,237,200 55,285,300 55,341,900 277,276,300 276,472,100 268,157,100 214,540,200 $ 1,302,323,500 The following is a summary of debt issued and secured by 2009 Measure A revenues, receipt of which began in FY 2009/10: 2005 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A: In February 2005, the Commission authorized a $200,000,000 commercial paper program. In March 2005, the Commission established the program for $185,000,000 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A and B. In October 2010, the program was reduced to $120,000,000; in September 2013, the program was further reduced to $60,000,000. The repayment of principal and interest on the commercial paper notes is secured by an irrevocable direct draw letter of credit issued by State Street Bank, and the Measure A sales tax revenues secure such repayment. Maturities of the commercial paper notes may range from one to 270 days, and interest rates are variable and dependent on current market conditions. The note agreements require the trustee to hold all note proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A, B, and C: In October 2009, the Commission issued $185,000,000 principal amount of serial bonds to refinance the 2008 bonds, retire a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the commercial paper notes and a portion of accrued interest on the notes, and fund a reserve fund. In September 2011, the reserve fund was released to fund project costs in connection with an extension of the SBPAs. The repayment of principal and interest on the 2009 Bonds is secured by the SBPAs with BTMU, and the Measure A revenues secure such repayment. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $6,500,000 to $13,700,000 on various dates through June 1, 2029 with variable interest rates set on a weekly basis. The 2009 Bonds are integrated with the interest rate swaps, thereby creating synthetic fixed rate debt. The 2009 Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2009 Bonds are summarized in Table 40. Table 40 — 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2029 Total Principal Interest Total Debt Service 7,800,000 5,428,400 8,100,000 5,506,000 8,500,000 5,187,700 8,900,000 4,853,800 9,300,000 4,514,900 52,900,000 16,732,300 51,400,000 5,324,300 $ 146,900,000 47, 547, 400 $ 13,228,400 13,606,000 13,687,700 13,753,800 13,814,900 69,632,300 56,724,300 $ 194,447,400 2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax -Exempt and Series B Taxable: In November 2010, the Commission issued $150,000,000 principal amount of serial bonds to retire all of the outstanding principal amount of the commercial paper notes and fund project costs. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $12,105,000 to $17,980,000 on various dates from June 1, 2030 through June 1, 2039. Interest rates for the Series A Tax -Exempt and Series B Taxable bonds are 5% and 6.807%, respectively. The Commission expects to receive cash subsidies from the U.S. Treasury related to the Series B Taxable bonds. The 2010 Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements, net of subsidy payments for the 2010 Bonds are summarized in Table 41. Table 41— 2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2039 Total Principal 12,105, 000 69,970,000 67,925,000 Interest 9,530,500 9,530,500 9,530,500 9,530,500 9,530,500 47,652,600 47,652,600 37,150,700 11, 788, 700 Subsidy (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (14,910,600) (14,910,600) (13,856,600) (5,098,700) $ 150,000,000 $ 191,897,100 $ (63,687,000) Net Debt Service $ 6,548,400 6,548,400 6,548,400 6,548,400 6,548,400 32,742,000 44,847,000 93, 264,100 74,615,000 $ 278,210,100 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax -Exempt: In July 2013, the Commission issued $462,200,000 principal amount of serial bonds at a premium of $38,328,800 to retire all of the outstanding principal amount of commercial paper notes, fund a portion of the 91 Project costs, pay capitalized interest during construction, and pay costs of issuance. The $286,065,000 of serial bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $12,090,000 to $24,450,000 on various dates from June 1, 2018 through June 1, 2033 at interest rates ranging from 5.00 to 5.25%. The $176,135,000 of term bonds are due on June 1, 2039 with annual sinking fund payments ranging from $25,735,000 to $33,235,000 on June 1, 2034 through June 1, 2039 at an interest rate of 5.25%. The 2013 Sales Tax Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds are summarized in Table 42. Table 42 — 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2039 Total Principal Interest Total Debt Service $ - $ 24,041,100 - 24,041,100 22,960,000 24,041,100 12,090,000 22,893,100 12,690,000 22,288,600 73,675,000 101, 227,000 94,900,000 80,000,800 122,560,000 52,333,000 123,325,000 16,600,200 $ 462,200,000 $ 367,466,000 $ 24,041,100 24, 041,100 47,001,100 34,983,100 34,978,600 174,902,000 174,900,800 174,893,000 139,925,200 $ 829,666,000 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Current Interest Obligation): In July 2013, the Commission issued $123,825,000 principal amount of serial CIBs to fund a portion of the 91 Project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an Operations and Maintenance Fund, and pay costs of issuance. The CIBs consist of a serial bond maturing on June 1, 2044 in the amount of $39,315,000 at an interest rate of 5.75% and a term bond due on June 1, 2048 in the amount of $84,510,000 with annual sinking funds payments of $42,255,000 on June 1, 2047 and June 1, 2048 at an interest rate of 5.75%. The Toll Revenue Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and segregate funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2013 Toll Revenue CIBS are summarized in Table 43. Table 43 — 2013 Toll Revenue Current Interest Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045 2046-2048 Total Principal 39,315,000 84,510,000 Interest Total Debt Service $ 7,119,900 7,119, 900 7,119,900 7,119, 900 7,119,900 35,599,700 35,599,700 35,599,700 35,599,700 33,339,100 12,148,300 $ 123,825,000 $ 223,485,700 $ 7,119,900 7,119, 900 7,119, 900 7,119, 900 7,119, 900 35,599,700 35,599,700 35,599,700 35,599,700 72,654,100 96,658,300 $ 347,310,700 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Capital Appreciation Obligation): In July 2013, the Commission issued $52,829,600 principal amount of serial CABS to fund a portion of the 91 Project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an Operations and Maintenance Fund, and pay costs of issuance. The CABS will not pay current interest as interest will be compounded commencing December 2013 semiannually and paid at maturity. Therefore, the CABS will increase in value, or accrete, by the accumulation of such compounded interest from its initial principal amount to the maturity value in installments ranging from $3,440,000 to $34,220,000 on various dates from June 1, 2022 through June 1, 2043. Interest rates and yield to maturity range from 5.30% to 7.15%. The Toll Revenue Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and segregate funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Debt service requirements for the 2013 Toll Revenue CABS are summarized in Table 44. Table 44 — 2013 Toll Revenue Capital Appreciation Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Accreted Interest Total Debt Service 2022-2023 $ 5,494,800 $ 3,655,200 2024-2028 18,364,700 22,490,300 2029-2033 15,215,000 34,850,000 2034-2038 1,963,300 6,196,700 2039-2041 11,791,800 78,458,200 Total $ 52,829,600 $ 145,650,400 9,150,000 40,855,000 50,065,000 8,160,000 90,250,000 $ 198,480,000 TIFIA Loan Agreement: In July 2013, the Commission executed a TIFIA loan of up to $421,054,400 for the 91 Project. In FY 2015/16, the Commission is expected to draw $261,277,900 principal amount of TIFIA loan proceeds for the 91 Project. During construction and for a period of up to five years following substantial completion, interest is compounded and added to the initial TIFIA loan. The TIFIA loan requires mandatory debt service payments at a minimum and scheduled debt service payments to the extent additional funds are available. TIFIA debt service payments are expected to commence on December 1, 2021, which is five years after substantial completion of the 91 Project, through June 1, 2051. The interest rate of the TIFIA loan is 3.47%. Based on a projected draw schedule, the following is an estimate of mandatory and scheduled debt service. Table 45 —TIFIA Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Mandatory Principal Interest Total Scheduled Interest Total 2019-2023 $ - $ 2024-2028 2029-2033 167,600 2034-2038 98,847,100 2039-2043 100,579,100 2044-2048 179,828,300 2049-2051 130,917,900 Total 510,340,000 $ Accretion (89,285,600) Initial Loan $ 421,054,400 3,901,700 23,937,700 74,772,800 82,933,400 62,230,000 41,881,800 6,628,000 296,285,400 3,901,700 23,937,700 74,940,400 181,780,500 162, 809,100 221,710,100 137,545,900 806,625,400 $ 31,515,900 $ 35,417,600 64,630,500 88,568,200 13,736,400 88,676,800 181,780,500 162, 809,100 - 221,710,100 - 137,545,900 $ 109,882,800 $ 916,508,200 In connection with the 2013 financing for the 91 Project, the Commission covenanted to deposit amounts with the toll trustee as an equity contribution to the 91 Project. The FY 2014/15 equity contribution is funded by transfers from the 1989 Measure A Western County highway fund, and the FY 2015/16 equity contribution is funded by transfers from the 1989 Measure A Western County highway fund and the 2009 Measure A Western County new corridors fund. The allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds to the 2009 Measure A programs is presented in Chart 23. Chart 23 — Program Long -Term Debt Highways and Regional Arterials 100% Local Streets and Roads 0% The allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds by the benefiting geographic area is presented in Chart 24. Chart 24 — Long -Term Debt by Geographic Area Coachella Valley 2% Western County 98% Outstanding Debt and Legal Debt Margin at June 30, 2016 A summary of the Commission's outstanding debt secured by Measure A sales tax revenues and related legal debt margin projected at June 30, 2016 is presented in Table 46: Table 46 — Legal Debt Margin Authorized Sales Tax Revenue Debt 2005 Commercial Paper Notes 2009 Bonds 2010 Bonds 2013 Sales Tax Bonds Total Outstanding Debt Legal Debt Margin 2009 Measure A $ 975,000,000 139,100,000 150,000,000 462,200,000 751,300,000 $ 223,700,000 Table 47 — Budget Comparison by Department FY 2014 — 2016 FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Revised Budget FY 14/15 Projected FY 15/16 Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax STA Sales Tax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements TUMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Total Revenues Expenditures Management Services: Executive Management Administration Legislative Affairs and Communications Finance Total Management Services Regional Programs: Planning and Programming Services Rail Maintenance and Operations Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assistance Total Regional Programs Capital Project Development and Delivery Debt Service: Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance Total Debt Service Total Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds TIFIA Loan Proceeds Bond Premium Bond Discount Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) $ 156,355,800 $ 167,000,000 $ 77,544,200 81,500,000 14, 409, 400 12, 944, 700 38,313,400 83,351,400 82,797,200 92,503,000 1,577,500 6,461,000 11,284,400 12,154, 600 1,081,100 575,000 9,979,900 2,450,900 393,342,900 458,940,600 305,300 1,340,600 917,200 4,435,400 6,998,500 474,600 2,304,500 1,189,400 5,366,700 9,335,200 167,000,000 81,500,000 12,944,700 67,665,500 60,628,500 5,334,800 12,042,700 221,200 4,138,000 411,475,400 523,400 1,991,800 974,800 4,925,300 8,415,300 $ 170,000,000 83,000,000 13,372,400 46,890,300 49,550,500 4,455,200 12,053,800 235,000 2,456,300 382,013,500 542,500 1,987,800 1,516,400 4,966,900 9,013,600 2,548,100 5,880,800 4,075,200 6,564,400 11,937,500 18,002,600 14,864,800 26,318,000 80,457,300 119,308,700 75,981,100 117,661,200 3,136,100 3,295,900 3,505,900 3,687,300 3,498,400 4,682,100 4,436,400 5,491,200 101,577,400 151,170,100 102,863,400 159,722,100 432,653,400 818,847,700 561,226,300 680,249,700 $ 3,000,000 1,500,000 427,700 (36,461,100) (42,952,500) (2,005,800) (100,800) (340,000) 5,400 (76,927,100) 67,900 (316,700) 327,000 (399,800) (321,600) 683,600 8,315,400 (1,647,500) 391,400 809,100 8,552,000 (138,598,000) 67,112,900 7,400,000 7,400,000 7,800,000 400,000 43,410,200 47,296,200 47,296,200 46,119,900 (1,176,300) 7,050,900 - 117,574,000 54,696,200 54,696,200 53,919,900 (776,300) 658,803,300 1,034,049,200 727,201,200 902,905,300 (131,143,900) 2% 2% 3% -44% -46% -31% -1% -59% 0% -17% 14% -14% 27% -7% -3% 12% 46% -1% 12% 17% 6% -17% 5% -2% N/A -1% -13% (265,460,400) (575,108,600) (315,725,800) (520,891,800) 54,216,800 481,987,700 526,661,100 254,035,100 136,077,400 (390,583,700) (481,987,700) (526,661,100) (254,035,100) (136,077,400) 390,583,700 638,854,600 191,600,000 116,059,000 261,277,900 69,677,900 38,328,800 - (2,433,300) -9% -74% -74% N/A 36% N/A N/A 674,750,100 191,600,000 116,059,000 261,277,900 69,677,900 36% 409,289,700 (383,508,600) (199,666,800) Beginning Fund Balance 622,186,700 1,031,476,400 1,031,476,400 (259,613,900) 123,894,700 -32% 831,809,600 (199,666,800) -19% Ending Fund Balance $ 1,031,476,400 $ 647,967,800 $ 831,809,600 $ 572,195,700 $ (75,772,100) -12% Executive Management Mission Statement: "To maintain the highest level of achievement and professionalism possible while managing the activities of the Commission with a small staff complemented with consultants; to effectuate sound transportation policies and legislation compatible with environmental standards." Chart 25 - Executive Management Support Costs "s 16% Professional Costs 66% Expenditures Executive Management has a budget of $542,500 (Table 48) for oversight of all Commission functions. The 32% net decrease in salaries and benefits reflects the allocation of FTEs to other programs; 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $360,000 include legal fees to defend recently enacted design -build legislation and other matters and consulting services for organizational training. Support costs include various membership dues and staff -related travel costs of $87,100. Table 48 - Executive Management Expenditure Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Legal Services Professional Services - General Total Professional Costs Support Costs TOTAL Executive Management $ 145,600 $ 139,600 $ 139,100 109,500 7,600 117,100 42,600 $ 305,300 $ 162,500 100,000 262,500 72,500 474,600 $ 211,300 100,000 311,300 73,000 523,400 $ 95,400 210,000 150,000 360,000 87,100 $ 542,500 $ (44,200) -32% 47,500 29% 50,000 50% 97,500 37% 14,600 20% $ 67,900 14% Executive Management Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Administrative Assistant 0.01 0.00 Deputy Executive Director 0.06 0.05 Executive Director 0.28 0.25 Government Relations Manager 0.00 0.05 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.05 0.05 FTE 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.05 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.36 Department Budget Overview Department Description The Executive Director is responsible for and provides strong leadership in developing and implementing new strategies at the local, regional, and statewide levels to assure delivery of transportation improvements and programs throughout the County. Furthermore, Executive Management is committed to fostering a positive and supportive work environment for staff that emphasizes quality work and encourages teamwork and open communication, with a commitment to serving the public. This is accomplished through a productive and collaborative effort with the members of the Commission and the oversight of the Commission's Executive Committee. Key Assumptions • The Executive Director will play a prominent role with external audiences with an emphasis on working with Congress, the California Legislature, Riverside County business organizations, and Southern California transportation agencies and local governments regarding advancing transportation policy in California. Policy concerns include the need for ongoing transportation investment, flexibility in project delivery methods, streamlining of environmental processes, and a renewed focus of the connection between transportation projects and the overall quality of life in Riverside County. • Project delivery will be a top priority in FY 2015/16 with construction proceeding on a number of capital projects. The Commission is serving as the lead agency on three notable, high -profile projects: the 91 Project in Corona, the Perris Valley Line, and the 1-15 Express Lanes project. The combined budget for these projects is approximately $2 billion. In addition to serving as the lead agency for the above -mentioned projects, the Commission is the primary funding agency of many other projects including the SR-91 HOV lane project in downtown Riverside, the 1-10 Jefferson interchange in the Coachella Valley, and the SR-60 truck climbing lane. • Another component of project delivery will include the need to complete the environmental review process on a number of future projects including the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment. • There will be a continued focus on enhanced cost-effective Metrolink and Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor service along with continuing development of a Service Development Plan (SDP) and possible environmental document for intercity rail service for the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass. • The advancement of construction on a number of projects will require a requisite increase in public outreach to the media and local governments as well as the need for watchful oversight over construction and right of way costs. • A renewed emphasis, as part of a regionwide effort, will be placed on working with local governments and stakeholders to advance active transportation projects such as bicycling, walking, and transit use. • The Commission will remain an active participant as part of a concerted statewide effort to seek additional transportation funding while advocating for process improvements to ease project development. Accomplishments FY 2014/15 saw extraordinary accomplishments at the Commission, placing it in the top tier of California transportation organizations. In several areas, the Commission stood by itself in successful advocacy, innovation, and leadership. • Continued construction on the widening of 91 Project in Corona which also includes the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County Line to 1-15. • Continued to implement components of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Continued progress on the environmental documents for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment projects. • Guided the Commission through an uncertain economic environment with cost savings and successful adherence to limits on administrative salaries and expenditures and approved a salary resolution which requires Commission employees to pay their full share of CaIPERS contributions by FY 2015/16. " Funded the completion of the 60/215 East Junction interchange. Completed bridge construction on the 1-215 Central project, which added a general purpose lane in each direction between Nuevo Road and Scott Road. The overall project will be open to traffic in mid-2015. " Continued a successful partnership with SANBAG to complete the 1-215 bi-county project which adds a HOV lane in each direction of the 1-215 from SR-60 to 1-10. " Continued to fund the acquisition of needed habitat for the Western Riverside County MSHCP as outlined in the 2009 Measure A Expenditure Plan. " Completed project work to ensure the allocation of Proposition 1B TCIF funding for a number of railroad grade separation and trade corridor projects. During the past fiscal year, construction was completed on the Iowa Avenue grade separation and the I-215/Van Buren interchange; construction began on the Auto Center Drive, Avenue 52, Avenue 56/Airport Boulevard, Clay Street, Magnolia Avenue, Streeter Avenue, Riverside Avenue and Sunset Avenue grade separation projects. " Advanced the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Corridor Pass rail study garnering regional, state, and federal support for the planning process. Major Initiatives FY 2015/16 will be a year of constant activity and will feature efforts to manage a number of high profile projects. Chief among them will be the 91 Project through Corona, a $1.4 billion dollar effort that will add general purpose and express lanes to a 10-mile stretch of one of southern California's most congested freeways. This will be Riverside County's largest transportation project and one of the most valuable, in terms of project cost, in the entire state. Along with the 91 Project, the Commission will continue to serve as the lead agency on construction for the Perris Valley Line and preliminary engineering and design -build phases on the 1-15 Express Lanes projects. The Commission, through its partnership with Caltrans, is funding construction to add HOV lanes on SR-91 through downtown Riverside. Caltrans and the Commission continue to partner on developing a truck climbing lane and shoulder widening project on SR-60 to improve safety and provide congestion relief. The Commission has approved significant state funding for the I-10/Jefferson Street interchange which began construction in FY 2014/15. While the focus will certainly be on construction, project development work continues with the planned completion and approval of environmental documents for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment projects. The Commission will continue alternatives analysis and planning efforts to advance the goal of additional passenger rail service to serve the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass rail corridor. This line has been incorporated in the State's rail plan, but more work must be done to ensure funding and facilities for regular and effective Amtrak service between Los Angeles and Phoenix. The Coachella Valley is also home to yet another innovative project known as the CV Link. This facility, primarily located along the Whitewater Wash, links the entire Coachella Valley with a trail to serve cyclists, pedestrians and Neighborhood Electric Vehicles. Likewise, the Commission is taking an active role throughout the County to advance active transportation projects for bicyclists and pedestrians. Working in partnership with the District, the Commission will provide project delivery support services for Santa Ana River Trail projects. The focus on these type of projects remains consistent with Southern California's RTP and SB375 which seeks to limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In terms of advancing policy, a major concern in moving forward is the state of California's financial position and commitment to funding infrastructure and transportation. The Commission will continue to take an aggressive and active role in protecting existing transportation funding and advocating for State investments in transportation. The Commission is an active member of the SHCC, California Association of Councils of Governments (CALCOG), and Mobility 21, and a major focus will be placed on advocacy for transportation in the State budget. Federal funding is also an important factor for the Commission's future, and the Commission will advocate strongly for the approval of a federal transportation bill. Congress' priorities will need to include funding goods movement and freight -related projects in Southern California. In Riverside County, goods movement investments will continue to focus on the need to complete highway/rail grade separation projects. The success of many of these efforts will rely on proactive external communications. Media relations will continue to be a priority, and press releases will remain a major effort along with social media and the Commission's On the Move monthly newsletter and annual report. An expanding and systematic outreach to business and civic groups, focusing on Commission efforts in terms of funding, construction, and services, will be the central feature of the communications program. Riverside County has also seen a major change in its state legislative delegation which will require a concerted outreach effort to new representatives on local transportation issues. While actively participating in all of these major endeavors, the Executive Director will maintain and improve administrative efficiency and fiscally sound practices characteristic of the Commission. With a total of 49 budgeted staff positions, the Commission's organization remains consistent with the Commission's direction. The Commission must continue to be competitive in the employment market and retain capable staff as well as attract high quality applicants. Staff training and development will continue, enabling our small and dedicated staff to enhance skills, productivity, and value. Our goal is to maintain the most effective mid -sized transportation agency in California. Department Goals Focus on timely and effective completion of capital projects and implementation of needed transportation services. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Maintain aggressive progress on 91 Project right of way acquisition, relocations, and construction activities. • Successfully manage financial responsibilities and investments for the 91 Project. • Continue with implementation of Toll Program Management Strategy. • Maintain aggressive progress on Perris Valley Line project construction. • Continue progress and outreach for Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Corridor Pass rail study. • Initiate a Riverside County Transportation Plan for use in establishing integrated transportation vision and priorities. • Continue progress on SR-79 realignment environmental study and complete Mid County Parkway environmental document. • Continue progress on 1-15 Express Lanes and SR-60 truck climbing lane projects. • Continue progress toward completion on 1-215 Central and SR 91-HOV lanes projects. • Maintain Metrolink coordination and engage in collaborative efforts to address significant funding and organizational challenges. • Continue engagement in rail discussions regarding Metrolink, the Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) rail corridor, and high-speed rail to ensure protection of Riverside service and the Commission's rights. • Support CVAG's transportation initiatives and projects. • Continue coordination with the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) on integration of express bus service into its operational plans. • Continue collaboration with other agencies on planning, funding, and construction of local and regional bike, trail and pedestrian facilities. • Implement Commission's adopted state and federal legislative platforms. • Pursue all funding opportunities to keep projects funded. • Ensure the Commission's active participation in RTP implementation. • Improve bi-county and regional partnerships. • Continue collaborative efforts with local agencies regarding priorities. • Communicate effectively and timely with community groups and leaders. Maximize funding for transportation improvements in Riverside County through legislative advocacy. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Place an emphasis on initiating federally authorized and funded projects included within the new federal transportation bill and the Commission's ongoing project priorities. • Advocate for passage of an effective, multi -year federal transportation bill. • Continue to advocate for federal investment in freight and goods movement infrastructure with the goal of mitigating community impacts while increasing capacity and local job creation and economic development. • Continue implementation of Transit Vision while addressing short- and long-term funding constraints. Support regional transportation solutions in cooperation with surrounding counties that are of benefit to Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Work with neighboring counties regarding corridor improvements on SR-91, 1-15, and 1-215. • Maintain an effective working relationship with the agencies that comprise Metrolink to ensure that Riverside County commuter rail needs are served in an efficient, effective, and safe manner. • Partner with SANBAG to enhance and publicize the 1E511 system and work with agencies in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles counties to provide effective, regional 511 traveler information services. • Play an active role in the implementation of revamping the implementation of intercity rail and commuter rail service in the LOSSAN rail corridor. • Be an active participant in discussions involving high-speed rail, especially concerning connectivity investments in the overall rail system in southern California. • Advocate for and take an active effort for additional intercity rail service to the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor. Maintain effective working relationships with Commissioners to strengthen and expand the Commission's leadership in transportation policy decision -making at all levels of government. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Facilitate Commissioner participation at the regional, state, and federal levels to raise the interests of the Commission and seek favorable action. • Continue regular communication between the Executive Director, senior staff, and the Commissioners. • Continue collaborative efforts with member agency staff regarding local priorities and funding challenges. • Work with other levels of local government such as the County Transportation Department, County Health Department, District, and local universities on quality of life issues that are connected to transportation such as air quality and the environment. • Provide assistance to Commissioners who serve on outside boards such as SCAG, Metrolink, LOSSAN, and the Mobile Sources Air Pollution Review Committee (MSRC) to assist their efforts to represent Riverside County. While maintaining a relatively small staff, promote the Commission's effectiveness by improving and developing staff skills, using state-of-the-art working tools, and fostering an environment that encourages and rewards individual and team effort. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue to maintain a well -documented employee appraisal process that provides clear, understandable, and measurable performance criteria for all employees. • Maintain and encourage staff morale and effectiveness. • Retain quality staff and evaluate staff retention strategies and options. • Complete and implement organizational initiatives. • Seek continuous improvement of staff effectiveness. Develop the framework for a Commission culture that enhances productivity, encourages regular and open communication among staff, and promotes the mutual achievement of individual and organizational goals and objectives. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Conduct a semi-annual review of organization accomplishments as measured against planned objectives to determine progress in meeting those objectives and action steps needed. • Facilitate open communications and coordination between management, professional staff, and support staff through regular meetings. Executive Management Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Expenditures $718,311,100 $658,803,300 $727,201,200 $902,905,300 Staffing levels 46 44 46 49 Administration costs as percentage of expenditures 1.06% 90% 1.16% 1% Administration Mission Statement: "To provide quality and efficient services to the Board of Commissioners, staff, and external customers and to comply with applicable federal and state requirements." Chart 26 - Administration Capital Outlay 8% Expenditures Professional Costs 23% As noted in Table 49, the Administration Department's total budget is $1,987,800 for office operations including management of office space, lease, and equipment; records; Commission and committee meetings; and special events as well as for the clerk of the board and human resources functions. Salaries and benefits expenditures of $617,600 reflects an increase of 2% related to increases for a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs and a 4% pool for merit - based salary increases. Professional costs of $448,500 cover various services including, but not limited to, Commissioners' per diem, legal fees, and consultant and other professional services and reflects an increase of 24% due to information technology consultant services. Support costs of $746,700 cover administrative overhead including office maintenance; information technology updates, support, and maintenance; and recruitments. Capital outlay of $175,000 reflects a decrease due to information technology support services and equipment upgrades in the previous fiscal year. Table 49 - Administration Expenditure Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 573,400 $ 606,600 $ 528,900 Professional Costs Commissioner Per Diem 87,200 65,000 65,000 Legal Services 400 37,000 26,000 Professional Services - General 61,300 261,000 195,000 Total Professional Costs 148,900 363,000 286,000 Support Costs 599,100 749,900 741,900 Capital Outlay 19,200 585,000 435,000 Debt Service 22,900 - - TOTAL Administration $ 1,363,500 $ 2,304,500 $ 1,991,800 $ 617,600 65,000 37,000 346,500 448,500 746,700 175,000 5 1.987.800 $ 11,000 2% 0% 0% 85,500 33% 85,500 24% (3,200) 0% (410,000) -70% N/A (316,700) -14% Administration Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Accounting Supervisor 0.01 0.00 Administrative Assistant 1.28 1.23 Clerk of the Board 1.00 1.00 Deputy Clerk of the Board 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Finance 0.08 0.02 Deputy Executive Director 0.00 0.00 Executive Director 0.00 0.01 Human Resources Administrator 1.00 1.00 Procurement Analyst 0.04 0.03 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.02 Records Technician 0.00 0.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.80 0.85 FTE 5.21 5.16 Department Budget Overview - Office Operations Department Description 0.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 1.00 0.06 0.02 1.00 0.26 0.53 5.00 Office Operations oversees the daily maintenance needs of the Commission's office facility and staff; manages information technology and records management systems; oversees the office lease; purchases office supplies and equipment; posts public notices on the website and local newspaper and notices of project completion; maintains a safe working environment for Commission board members, staff, and consultants; and provides support services. Key Assumptions • Support is provided to 49 full-time Commission staff. • Requests for proposals and project notices of completion are posted in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. • Information technology systems are upgraded and maintained to ensure efficiency. • An accurate and efficient records management system is maintained. • Requests for public records are responded to in accordance with the California Public Records Act. Accomplishments • Updated the web page in a timely manner for the postings of public notices. • Upgraded the information technology infrastructure. • Maintained the electronic records management system to ensure accurate and efficient processing of incoming and outgoing correspondence and documents. • Maintained a disaster recovery plan to ensure uninterrupted Commission operations. • Responded to public records requests in accordance with the California Public Records Act. Major Initiatives The Commission will work to enhance its electronic records management system in order to achieve greater efficiencies and strengthen the Commission's records management processes and procedures. The system pertains to the management, storage, and accessibility of the Commission's actions and documents and the retention capability for incoming and internally created records. Development of the information technology structure of the Commission's toll program will continue. Office Operations will continue to provide high quality support services to the Board and to internal and external customers by providing a work environment that enhances the overall mission of the Commission. Department Goal — Office Operations Ensure quality service that demonstrates responsiveness and flexibility and provides services at the most reasonable cost. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Support 49 full-time staff. • Provide accessibility to meeting agendas, legal notices, requests for proposal, and employment opportunities through the Commission's web page. • Continue to improve administrative efficiency through automation of records processing. • Post legal notices and requests for proposals on the Commission's web page and in the newspapers on a timely basis. • Provide office supplies, equipment, and services consistent with intended quality and capabilities at the most advantageous price afforded in the market. • Manage the Commission's information technology systems. Department Budget Overview — Clerk of the Board Department Description The Clerk of the Board provides support services to the Board of Commissioners and its alternates and for Commission and committee meetings. It serves as an important resource for the Commission and has the responsibility for recording, publishing, preserving, and filing meeting proceedings of documents acted upon by the Commission and its committees; posting legal notices; processing claims against the Commission; fulfilling requirements of the Commission and the committees as it relates to the Conflict of Interest Code; serving as the Filing Officer for Economic Interest and Campaign Disclosure statements and legal claims against the Commission; coordinating Commission special events and meetings; and performing all duties required by law, rules, or order of the Board. As such, this department has a direct link and responsibility to serving local taxpayers and the public while supporting the actions of the Commission. The need to be accountable to the public at large is further amplified by the need to comply with federal and state law requiring prompt responses to California Public Records Act requests. Key Assumptions • Staff support and meeting services are provided to 34 Commissioners and their alternates, the Commission, four established committees, and a number of ad hoc committees. • Monthly agenda packets and supporting documents are published and distributed in accordance with the Brown Act. • Officers and members of the Commission are kept informed by providing them with the most current and accurate data to assist them and facilitate their decision making responsibilities. • Frequent communication with Commissioners continues to provide news and updates on Commission items and transportation -related meetings. • Available technology is used to provide simplified access of agenda items and Commission actions to the public, local agencies, and staff. Accomplishments • Updated the web page and the bulletin board for the agenda, minutes, and supporting documents. • Posted legal notices in local newspapers and on the Commission's web page. • Regularly advised officers and members of the Commission and their staff on changes to Commission meetings and other transportation -related meetings. • Arranged Commission and committee meetings and special events of the Commission. " Processed and transmitted Commission -approved resolutions to appropriate agencies in a timely manner. Major Initiatives Each year, local agencies make changes to their appointments regarding their representation on the Commission. Staff will continue to make every effort to ensure that the newly appointed representatives, as well as their respective staff, are aware of operational policies of the Commission and other transportation -related meetings. There will be continued emphasis on the utilization of electronic mail with Commissioners for more efficient communications. Clerk of the Board staff will continue to provide high quality support services to the Board. Staff will also continue to update technology to streamline processes and procedures for easier access to Commission actions, minutes, resolutions, and ordinances, including electronic agenda distribution. Department Goals  Clerk of the Board Ensure coordination and documentation of Commission and committee meetings and provide public accessibility to agenda items as required by state regulations. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Provide accurate, high quality agenda packets for Commission and committee meetings. " Continue to provide support to Commission members, staff, and attendees of Commission and committee meetings. " Post meeting agendas and supporting documents in compliance with Brown Act requirements. " Maintain an accurate list of Commissioners and alternates and submit membership roster changes to the Secretary of State. " Maintain and file all Commission and committee meetings and official records of the Commission. " Perform all duties within mandated deadlines. " Maintain and promote good Commission and staff relations. Facilitate access of information to Commission records. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: " Continue to respond to requests for records and information on a timely basis and in accordance with state law. " Continue to improve the Commission's recordkeeping practices by updating the electronic records management system. " Maintain Commission agreements, amendments, MOUs, resolutions, and ordinances. " Maintain a centralized database for Commissioners, agencies, and consultant contact information. " Coordinate special activities, meetings, events, and conferences as requested by the Executive Director and the Commission. Department Budget Overview  Human Resources Department Description Human Resources responsibilities include planning, administering, and implementing human resources programs, including the recruitment, selection, and appraisal process; employee training and development; classification and compensation studies; benefits administration; employee relations; and recommending, implementing and maintaining personnel policies, procedures, and practices. Key Assumptions • Quality service levels will be maintained in all human resources programs. • The assessment of Human Resources policies, practices and procedures will continue. • Continuous improvement in communication with employees regarding Human Resources information will be an ongoing process. • Compliance with state and federal labor law regulations is achieved. Accomplishments • Completed an audit of member earnings and retirement enrollments with CaIPERS. • Created a new employee performance appraisal system. • Adopted a resolution in response to the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), requiring existing employees to begin paying and reporting the value of an equal share of the normal pension costs. Effective July 11, 2013 existing employees began to pay 3% toward the normal pension costs and thereafter will pay an additional 3% in FY 2014/15 and 2% in FY 2015/16 for a total annual normal pension cost contribution of 8%, offset by a corresponding salary increase. • Provided the annual Benefit Statement to all employees. • Regularly provided information to employees on changes to health insurance, 401(a) defined and 457 deferred compensation plans and the personnel policies and procedures manual Commission's intranet and quarterly employee newsletter. • Recruited and filled three interns, six full-time positions, and one part-time provisional position. • Held mandatory training sessions on violence in the workplace, harassment -free workplace, workplace. • Conducted a training needs assessment of all staff members and created a professional development training program addressing the following areas: presentation skills, negotiations skills, conflict resolution, supervisor's academy, administrative assistant's workshop, procurement and contracts processes, website editing, Brown Act, Public Records Retention Act, and Commission agenda submission processes. • Disclosed employees' compensation on the Commission's website in compliance with the State Controller's Office and CaIPERS. Major Initiatives contribution, through the and drug -free Human Resources focuses on managing employees and consists of a framework of activities and practices that support and develop a motivated workforce while at the same time complying with legislation and regulations that govern the employer/employee relationship and ensuring parameters for fair and consistent decision -making and good workplace practices. Staff will use written position descriptions and performance expectations in order to obtain a clear and consistent understanding of what is expected. The Commission's practice is to conduct a classification and compensation review every two years to ensure fair compensation is established to attract and retain the most qualified employees. After the postponement of the biennial classification and compensation review program in 2009 due to the slowdown in the economy and declining sales tax revenues, the Commission reinstituted the biennial classification and compensation review program at the request of the Executive Committee in response to the implementation of the PEPRA provisions. The Commission will provide the final one-time 2% cost of living adjustment to offset the employees' contribution to the normal pension costs and up to a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases based on the performance of staff in FY 2015/16. Department Goals — Human Resources Administer human resources policies, procedures, and programs in order to align personnel laws and the Commission's policies with continuous improvement principles. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Review and update personnel policies and procedures to comply with federal and state requirements. • Provide information to enhance the employee's knowledge of current personnel policies and procedures in various forms including electronic access, workshops, and printed information. • Ensure that employee personnel records are documented and updated timely for various personnel actions. Continue to employ and recruit a dynamic and talented workforce. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Maintain a compensation program that ensures internal equity and external competitiveness within the pay structure for Commission employees. • Exercise care in making high -quality, diverse appointments. Develop and implement a comprehensive new employee orientation program. Develop people to be their best in order to meet the needs of the organization. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Build and maintain an effective performance system to include timely performance evaluations, personal development, and a supportive work environment. • Provide appropriate and timely training to meet the demands of the organization and professional growth and development of all staff members. • Foster teamwork through cooperative efforts and support for shared success. Understand and consistently deliver excellent customer service to all employees. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Focus on "employee as customer" and consistently strive to exceed expectations by supporting and maintaining individual respect, appreciation, management accessibility, and communication. • Assist employees in utilizing employer -provided benefits to enhance their health, wellness, and quality of life. Improve the quality of the work culture. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Develop and maintain a safe and healthy working environment by retaining open lines of communication throughout the organization, compliance with established federal, state, and local regulations, and best practices in preventing safety and legal risk. • Provide a safe working environment with the maintenance of an injury and illness prevention program. • Maintain a proactive employee relations process by facilitating a collaborative, professional working environment with all staff members. • Promote a work/family balance. • Recognize and reward individual contributions, innovation, and learning from experience. Administration Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Employee rules/Benefits review sessions held 3 5 5 5 Recruitments 8 11 9 6 Positions filled 8 11 10 6 Legal notices 28 26 24 25 Commission/Committee/Ad Hoc meetings 60 45 42 50 Commissioners supported (including alternates) 62 62 62 62 Staff supported: Regular full-time 46 44 46 49 Temporary/Seasonal 2 2 4 2 Legislative Affairs and Communications Mission Statement: "To improve the mobility of Riverside County residents by working through the legislative process and by maintaining effective community outreach. This is supported by facilitating interactive communications with the public and transportation stakeholders through various outreach, advocacy and media efforts." Chart 27 — Legislative Affairs and Communications Support Costs 12% Professional Costs 48 Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 40% The Legislative Affairs and Communications Department has a total budget of $1,516,400 (Table 50). Salaries and benefits have increased 18% and reflect a change in FTEs, a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs, and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $728,200 include legislative advocacy, graphic design, and website updates and reflects an increase of 39% due to public outreach and marketing efforts related to the commencement of Perris Valley Line commuter rail operations and education regarding rail safety. Support costs of $187,700 include publications and advertising, various membership dues, and staff -related travel costs and reflect a 21% increase primarily due to increased staff participation in statewide and national legislative advocacy and communications efforts as well as billboard and other media advertisements. Table 50 — Legislative Affairs and Communications Expenditure Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 418,800 $ 510,700 $ 388,300 $ 600,500 $ 89,800 18% Professional Costs Legal Services 1,200 12,000 12,000 12,000 0% Professional Services - General 350,700 511,200 495,000 716,200 205,000 40% Total Professional Costs 351,900 523,200 507,000 728,200 205,000 39% Support Costs 146,500 155,500 79,500 187,700 32,200 21% TOTAL Legislative Affairs and Communications $ 917,200 $ 1,189,400 $ 974,800 $ 1,516,400 $ 327,000 27% Legislative Affairs and Communications Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Administrative Assistant 0.22 0.25 Public Affairs Manager 0.07 0.15 Deputy Executive Director 0.79 0.64 Executive Director 0.04 0.02 Goods Movement Manager 0.03 0.30 Government Relations Manager 1.00 0.81 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.05 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.02 FTE 2.15 2.24 Department Budget Overview Department Description Legislative Affairs 0.25 0.15 0.84 0.00 0.10 0.93 0.04 0.00 2.31 Transportation issues affect a number of jurisdictions and stakeholders. Through proactive participation, the Commission plays a strong influential leadership role at all levels of government to advance its interests and policy goals. The importance of legislative engagement is magnified when the Commission seeks changes in law or needs legislative authorization to move forward with a specific project. The Commission's Legislative Affairs efforts focus on taking full advantage of opportunities at both the federal and state levels when there is a potential impact to Commission programs and projects. In doing so, the Commission maintains its role as a major legislative force and a statewide leader on a broad range of issues affecting transportation policy such as project delivery and financing. This requires the establishment and maintenance of ongoing communication with Riverside County's legislative delegations in Washington and Sacramento. The Commission accomplishes this via a combined effort that includes Commissioners, staff, and legislative consultants in the two capitals. The Commission retains three legislative consultants who are under contract through the end of 2016. Two consultants are based in Washington, D.C., and one is in Sacramento. All are paid on a monthly retainer, and the FY 2015/16 budget does not include any fee increases for these legislative consultants. The effort also requires working with other transportation agencies throughout the State in order to collaborate on issues of mutual concern. This cooperation takes place in a number of forums including a monthly meeting of transportation commission chief executive officers; a legislative roundtable of regional transportation advocates; Mobility 21; SHCC; CALCOG; and International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association. In 2015, four State Assembly Members representing Riverside County legislators have been appointed to the Assembly Transportation Committee, and one State Senator from Riverside County is on the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee. These appointments place Riverside County in a prominent policy - making role on transportation issues in the State Legislature. The Commission will need to engage these elected officials to ensure that our region is represented in state policy. An emerging issue that the Commission is tracking is the development of a road charge pilot program that could replace the excise tax on gasoline. The Commission seeks an active role in ensuring the pilot program addresses the needs and concerns of Riverside County residents and businesses. The Commission's Executive Director has been appointed as Chair of an advisory committee overseeing the road charge pilot program. A continuing concern through FY 2015/16 is modernization of CEQA. Potential changes to this law could have significant benefits to the Commission's ability to deliver needed projects that improve mobility and benefit the environment. In Washington, it will be important to monitor the implementation and reauthorization of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). In terms of federal action on specific projects, the Commission will seek a TIFIA loan for the 1-15 Express Lanes project, similar to the TIFIA loan executed for the 91 Project in 2013. The 1-15 Express Lanes project has also been accepted into the White House's Building America Transportation Investment Center for enhanced assistance from the U.S. DOT for achieving timely federal approvals. The Commission will also heighten its policy presence on matters pertaining to tolling policy. In recent years, federal and state legislators have given significant attention to how tolling on highways is regulated. With the 91 Project under construction and 1-15 Express Lanes project on the near -term horizon, the Commission has increasing interest in participating in these discussions. The Commission is coordinating with SHCC on legislation that would streamline statewide tolling policy. Finally, funding will be a fundamental focus of the Legislative Affairs program at the Commission. The SBOE has reduced the price -based fuels excise tax, resulting in significant revenue losses to cities and the County, and potentially to the Commission's funding capacity to program projects in the STIP. Meanwhile, in Washington the Highway Trust Fund remains in a precarious position as Congress struggles to identify a stable funding source. The Commission will need to engage in difficult yet essential legislative negotiations on how to stabilize and increase transportation funding. Communications The Commission is committed to communicating with and educating a broad arena of interested parties on the roles and responsibilities of the agency. An emphasis will continue to be placed on informing Riverside County residents and businesses about transportation projects and services and maintaining open communication with other transportation stakeholders. Various forms of media and communication tools are used in these outreach efforts with the overall objectives to provide accurate, informative, and easily accessible information; facilitate public participation in the Commission processes; and maintain effective relationships. The Deputy Executive Director is responsible for communications with the news media and prepares text for Commission materials, presentations, and speeches. Along with the Executive Director, the Deputy Executive Director, Public Affairs Manager, and individual project managers actively participate in public presentations at the local, regional, and state levels to represent the Commission's interests. Strong relationships with the news media are very important to ensure that the public is well informed regarding the Commission's progress in determining funding priorities, designing infrastructure improvements, and constructing projects. There are many points throughout these processes in which the public can and should play a role in shaping the future of the County's transportation network. Communications will continue to expand its use of social media and utilize other emerging technologies that can be incorporated into the overall outreach effort of the Commission. Key Assumptions • The Government Relations Manager will oversee legislative affairs work efforts with guidance from the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. • Communications will oversee the annual report to the public and will post it on the Commission's website in a printable format. • The On the Move newsletter will be published and distributed electronically and posted on the Commission's website. " The Speakers Bureau effort will continue to seek local community opportunities to expand outreach regarding the Commission's activities. " The Commission's website will be updated and refreshed on a regular basis. " Additional communications tools and opportunities will be explored for incorporation into the ongoing program to help build public awareness of Commission activities including radio, television, and social media outlets such as Twitter, Facebook, and other emerging technologies. " The Commission will continue to take a leadership role in formulating a countywide direction on federal transportation policy. " Goods movement will continue as a policy priority for the Commission. " The Commission will monitor and influence the development of the national freight network required by MAP-21. " The Commission will play an active role in the reauthorization of MAP-21. " Government Relations will assist the Commission in taking a leadership role in Sacramento on modernization of CEQA. Accomplishments " Achieved passage of AB1721 (Linder), which strengthens the financing of the 1-15 Express Lanes project by allowing the Commission to charge a discounted toll rate to certain low emission vehicles, rather than being required to exempt them from tolls as previous law mandated. " Achieved passage of SB953 (Roth), which authorized the Commission to enforce parking regulations at its rail stations. " Assisted in providing legislative language regarding goods movement that was written into proposed legislation by the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. " Successfully advocated for the Commission to receive a $3 million FRA grant for the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Corridor Pass rail study. " Developed a four -page annual report and posted it on the Commission's website in a printable format. " Provided project tours of the Perris Valley Line and other projects for legislators and their staff. " Continued to update the functionality of the Commission's website. " Continued effective relationships with the news media resulting in informative coverage regarding local and regional transportation issues and Measure A project delivery. " Provided extensive public outreach support as part of the project development process for the Mid County Parkway, Perris Valley Line, 91 Project, 60/215 East Junction HOV lane connectors, and 1-215 corridor improvement (central segment) projects. " Conducted multiple public meetings as part of the environmental review process for a number of projects including the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment projects. " Conducted an aggressive speaking outreach campaign on the active and preconstruction projects totaling over 30 presentations delivered to council meetings, community service groups, and transportation oriented groups. " Supported the Rail Department in the development of various marketing materials and advertisements including weekend and holiday train services. " Developed a new marketing campaign to encourage Metrolink ridership during the SR-91 freeway construction and the impending completion of the Perris Valley Line. " Continued to take a leadership role and collaborate with neighboring counties, local business leaders, Mobility 21, SHCC, and CALCOG on many transportation policy issues in Sacramento and Washington. " Continued work with the Southern California National Freight Gateway collaboration to foster cooperation, coordination, and collaboration to facilitate the movement of goods through southern California. " Revised collateral materials, which are often distributed at public events, for an overview of the Commission's programs and projects as well as construction projects planned for Western County. " Improved and maintained the Commission's photo library to assist with documenting the project delivery progress of the voter -approved Measure A sales tax programs. The photo library has been used to develop PowerPoint presentations, information brochures, TIFIA loan submissions, and capital project collateral material. • Maintained a presence on the social networking site Twitter which can be accessed at http://twitter.com/RCTC. • Took an active role in providing comments and ensuring that Riverside County projects were included in the RTP. • Continued to provide a Commissioner -orientation program that bolsters Commissioner knowledge and participation regarding Commission projects and activities and was presented to every new Commissioner. Major Initiatives Legislative Affairs The Commission will continue to advocate strategically and effectively on the policy issues described above in Washington and Sacramento, utilizing its contract advocacy teams, coalitions, and partnerships. The Commission will seek to build on its recent successes in both capitals and continue to maintain a strong presence as a respected, knowledgeable, and effective resource to policy leaders and decision -makers. Communications The Commission provides information to the public through various channels including: 1) participation at public meetings, chambers of commerce, industry associations, and service clubs; 2) production and provision of resource materials and fact sheets; 3) maintenance and enhancement of the Commission's website; and 4) development of newspaper press releases, radio and television interviews, cable television spots, and project videos. The Commission's largest publication effort to provide widespread understanding of its projects and expenditures is its four -page annual report which is posted on the Commission's website in a printable format. A continuing emphasis will be placed on providing communications support to major project development efforts including the Perris Valley Line, the Mid County Parkway, 91 Project, 1-15 Express Lanes, and the 1-215 corridor improvement (central segment) project. The need for proactive public communication and outreach remains important, as the Commission continues to move forward with the delivery of the Measure A work program. This is an area of emphasis, as the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan places the Commission in a high -profile role to deliver large-scale highway projects. This will require continued contact with the public by the Public Affairs Manager. Specifically, as the Commission commences operations on the Perris Valley Line, there is a need for community outreach in two areas: rail safety and marketing. A pilot program has begun for community education in rail safety known as Operation Lifesaver. The Communications Department has developed an outreach program that has targeted the schools along the Perris Valley Line and other areas in the County where schools are in close proximity to the railroad tracks. Additionally, staff is working with Metrolink to develop a marketing strategy focusing on the areas along the Perris Valley Line in order to prepare the communities for this expanded service. The overall goal is to bring awareness to the communities of the new transit option of the extended Metrolink service and educate them on how to behave in a safe manner around an active rail line. The Commission's outreach will include a proactive effort to work closely with various media formats such as print, radio, internet, social media and television to increase their understanding and interest in transportation issues and to generate a higher level of media coverage. Toward that end, opportunities will be identified for live or taped interviews and presentations that speak to local residents and employers and their questions concerning transportation issues. Appropriate forums may include city council meetings, local cable television, radio, and regular 91 Project videos posted to the project website via YouTube. The Commission will also conduct a small business expo jointly with the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency to promote awareness of contracting opportunities related to the Commission's projects and programs. Broad distribution of On the Move, an a -mail newsletter highlighting actions of the Commission and emerging topics, will continue as part of the Commission's communications. Efforts will continue to update and expand the Commission's contact database including e-mail addresses in order to support distribution of the Commission's public information materials. New Commissioner -orientation meetings will be provided by the Executive Director, Deputy Executive Director, and Clerk of the Board in individualized settings. To supplement individual Commissioner meetings with the Executive Director, continuing education opportunities at the small group level will also be provided to Commissioners that focus on timely issues. Department Goals Foster the Commission's full involvement and input in a broad range of local, regional, state, and federal government settings. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement, System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Participate in the SHCC; California Transit Association; Southern California Legislative Roundtable; League of Cities; CALCOG; Mobility 21; Southern California National Freight Gateway Collaboration; regional, state and federal transportation agencies; and community/business organizations to influence funding and policy decisions that impact Riverside County. • Maintain a leadership role in local and regional transportation venues related to project development efforts and current and emerging issues. • Provide leadership to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of the MSRC to ensure that funding for air quality -related transportation improvements is fully distributed to Riverside County jurisdictions. • Work with SCAG, WRCOG, and CVAG to monitor and respond to transportation issues involving the implementation of SB375 on smart growth planning and the state's Cap and Trade program. • Coordinate with other local agencies and business interests to modernize and reform CEQA to improve project delivery and deter frivolous lawsuits and challenges that delay projects. • Continue regular meetings at the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer level with transportation agencies throughout the region. • Conduct ongoing meetings and communication with transit providers in Riverside County. Implement the Commission's state and federal legislative program to maximize flexibility in the use of existing transportation revenues by supporting legislation to protect and increase current funding levels, ensuring an equitable distribution of available resources, streamlining administrative procedures to reduce costs and time of project development, and accelerating the allocation and use of existing resources. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Coordinate legislative activities of federal and state legislative consultants and obtain monthly reports on activities performed. • Work with board members to establish policy positions, review and analyze legislation, visit with elected representatives in Sacramento and Washington, draft legislation, and maintain strong relationships with key decision -makers. • Provide regular updates to the Commission regarding state and federal government issues. • Effectively represent the Commission before the state and federal legislative bodies, CTC, and other agencies in funding, programming, and policy matters. • Convene meetings with state, federal, and legislative staff members. Support the continuing education of Commissioners to increase their understanding of transportation -related issues at local, state, and federal levels to maximize the effectiveness of the Commission in affecting policy and funding actions. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Provide orientation training for new Commissioners. • Produce and distribute a monthly e-mail newsletter, On the Move, highlighting actions and activities of the Commission. • Provide periodic educational workshops or study sessions for Commissioners. • Provide on -going up -dates to Commissioners, via e-mail, on topical issues including projects, funding and newsworthy events impacting the Commission. Develop and maintain an information program which educates the public and other stakeholders on the roles and responsibilities of the Commission as it relates to accomplishments achieved through Measure A or other funding sources controlled or administered by the Commission. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Expand, maintain, and update information on the Commission's website including individual project websites and social media. • Annually produce a report that informs the public regarding Measure A progress and other Commission programs. • Issue news releases to the local media announcing significant achievements and providing information on Commission actions and activities. • Develop and maintain open lines of communication with news reporters to facilitate adequate and accurate news coverage. • Schedule periodic media information briefings or news conferences when a particular issue warrants it. • Expand the stock of video footage for use in production of cable television spots that feature transportation projects funded and/or implemented by the Commission. • Periodically use cable television and other forms of media such as internet sites and blogs, if appropriate, to communicate information to the public regarding the Commission's activities and services. • Coordinate and oversee message content of all Commission publications and communications to provide uniformity of message and direction. • Support the development and planning of projects in regard to public outreach and communication efforts. • Require the use of Measure A project/program signage by funding recipients to increase public awareness of Measure A accomplishments. • Continue to administer and expand the use of the Speakers Bureau to reach community members in service and other organizations. • Monitor and distribute media coverage from various outlets in the County and throughout the region to Commissioners and staff to enable them to closely follow transportation policy trends. • Provide oversight and coordination to Commission departments in the development of communications' materials. Foster and maintain effective communications with other agencies to heighten their understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the Commission and increase interagency coordination and cooperation. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objective: • Assign designated staff members to attend other agency meetings and require staff to provide written/verbal communication on topics of discussion during regular staff meetings. Legislative Affairs and Communications Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Speakers bureau presentations/events 118 167 130 140 Legislative action submittals to Commission 9 8 7 8 Southern California legislative staff roundtables 10 10 9 10 Finance Mission Statement: "To safeguard the Commission's assets and maintain strong and prudent fiscal controls in accounting, budgeting, procurements, debt financing, investing, and financial reporting including ongoing disclosure to all interested parties. To seek financing alternatives that complement the Commission's strategic direction." Chart 28 — Finance Salaries and Benefits 8% Support Costs ; 9% Expenditures The Finance Department's total budget is $13,974,800 (Table 51) and reflects a 34% increase over the prior year's budget. Department staffing costs will total $1,077,900, reflecting an increase due to FTE allocations; a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $2,648,300 include various services related to general and specialized legal, financial and investment advisory, external and internal audits, debt management, CAFR and annual budget graphic design, and procurement. Support costs of $1,190,700 include insurance, printing, and staff training. Capital outlay of $50,000 includes ERP updates. A transfer out of $9,000,000 is related to funding a portion of the debt service interest payments from the 2009 Measure A Western County bond financing program, and $7,900 reflects funding for 2009 Measure A Western County local street and roads administration. Table 51— Finance Expenditure Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 887,300 $ 921,400 $ 926,300 $ 1,077,900 $ 156,500 17% Professional Costs Legal Services 29,600 525,000 395,000 110,000 (415,000) -79% Audit Services 361,300 528,000 425,000 500,000 (28,000) -5% Financial Advisory 377,000 260,000 510,000 550,000 290,000 112% Professional Services - General 2,182,200 2,030,500 1,689,000 1,488,300 (542,200) -27% Total Professional Costs 2,950,100 3,343,500 3,019,000 2,648,300 (695,200) -21% Support Costs 598,000 1,076,800 955,000 1,190,700 113,900 11% Capital Outlay - 25,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 100% Transfers Out 5,000,000 5,047,700 5,000,000 9,007,900 3,960,200 78% TOTAL Finance $ 9,435,400 $ 10,414,400 $ 9,925,300 $ 13,974,800 $ 3,560,400 34% Finance Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Accountant 2.00 2.00 Accounting Technician 2.00 2.00 Accounting Supervisor 0.99 1.00 Administrative Assistant 0.30 0.32 Chief Financial Officer 0.48 0.48 Deputy Director of Finance 0.91 0.96 Procurement Analyst 0.13 0.10 Procurement Manager 0.08 0.05 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.15 0.10 FTE 7.04 7.01 Department Budget Overview Department Description Finance and Accounting 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.01 0.65 1.00 0.10 0.03 0.31 0.32 7.42 Commission resources are allocated to assure financial stability and fiscal accountability. Finance activities include investing the Commission's cash resources, planning and directing financial transactions, and subsequent monitoring of legal and regulatory requirements. Adequate cash flow must be maintained while at the same time prudently investing operating and capital funds. Borrowing needs are carefully planned using both short- and long- term debt. Once debt is issued, there are ongoing responsibilities including interaction with financial advisors, bankers, dealers and remarketing agents, underwriters, bond counsel, bond insurers, trustees, issuing and paying agents, arbitrage consultants, investment managers, and rating agencies as well as providing regular and consistent information disclosure to investors. Fiscal accountability involves receiving all funds due the Commission, paying all Commission obligations, maintaining the general ledger, reporting regularly on the Commission's fiscal results, and preparing and monitoring the budget. Fiscal accountability requires the coordination of budget planning and monitoring and the accurate and timely accounting for all funding sources, including compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing those funds. Accounting encompasses cash receipt and disbursement functions, maintenance of the general ledger including project cost accounting, payroll processing, quarterly and annual financial reporting, and retention of and coordination with independent auditors. The Commission also recognizes the importance of accountability for the organization. As a result, the Commission is highly regarded by individuals, peers, other organizations, and government officials at a local, regional, state, and national basis. A formal organizational accountability program was approved in January 2006 to address fraud risk, ethical conduct, financial and operational disclosure, and maintaining the public's confidence in the Commission. Accordingly, measures have been implemented based on a conceptual framework related to oversight, reporting, fraud, internal control, and ethics. Procurement Management In the management of the procurements and contracts process, the responsibility of the procurement management function is to ensure that the procurement policies approved by the Commission are followed and procurement procedures are updated as required. The function is responsible for the purchase of all goods and services, except for real property acquisition, in accordance with Commission policies and federal and state funding requirements to ensure the implementation of the Commission's projects and programs. This includes the administration of the Commission's DBE and SBE programs. Procuring goods and services for the Commission is a cooperative effort. All Commission staff involved in procurements for their projects and programs are responsible to employ sound judgment and appropriate standards of ethics and fairness to procure in a manner most advantageous to the Commission. The Procurement division also conducts a review of and updates insurance coverage for the Commission and its properties. Key Assumptions • The commercial paper letter of credit and sales tax revenue bond SBPAs facilities will be maintained with strong short-term ratings. • The Commission's will maintain strong AA category long-term credit ratings related to its sales tax bonds. • Proceeds from the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds, 2013 Toll Bonds, and TIFIA loan will be used to fund the 91 Project. • The financing plan for the 1-15 Express Lanes project will include CMAQ funds, proceeds from sales tax bonds and toll revenue bonds, and a TIFIA loan. • Arbitrage calculations related to the outstanding debt issues will be performed by a consultant on an annual basis. • The Commission will pay 100% of the actuarially determined contribution related to postretirement health care benefits based on a current actuarial valuation. • The Commission will implement GASB Statement No. 68 related to the accounting and financial reporting for pensions. • Directors and program managers will continue to have adequate project budget and accounting information to make informed decisions. • Construction fund bond proceeds will be invested in mid-term securities that mature in accordance with the construction draw schedule. Operating funds will be invested in state and local agency investment pools for short-term liquidity purposes and in mid-term treasury and federal agency securities as available funds are identified. The overall interest rate is conservatively projected to be 0.25% for state and County investment pools and 0.75% for debt service and construction funds managed by an investment management and advisory firm. • Procurements will be conducted in accordance with the Commission's procurement policy manual. • Procurement will continue to develop and implement a standardized procurement filing system and maintain centralized procurement files. • Procurement will conduct outreach activities to encourage DBE and SBE participation in various contracts. Accomplishments • Prepared and submitted to TIFIA the Financial Plan Annual Update for the 91 Project. • Prepared and submitted required continuing disclosure reports related to the 91 Project financing to TIFIA and/or the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's Electronic Municipal Market Access System, including the monthly construction progress report. • Conducted a presentation and tour of the SR-91 corridor improvement project for TIFIA and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) California Division staff. This was the second site visit in connection with the oversight and monitoring of the TIFIA loan. • Presented an update to the rating agencies of the Commission's sales tax and toll financing programs. • Substituted new SBPAs related to the 2009 Bonds with BTMU. • Substituted a new letter of credit and reimbursement agreement related to the commercial paper program with State Street Bank. • Issued a request for proposals and awarded a contract for underwriter services for the 1-15 Express Lanes project financing. • Issued a request for proposals and awarded a contract for the Commission's annual audit. • Issued a request for proposals and awarded a contract for actuarial valuation services related to the Commission's postretirement health care benefits under GASB Statement No. 45. • Appointed a successor trustee for the toll bonds indenture. • Obtained financial reporting excellence award from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) (22nd year) related to the CAFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. " Obtained GFOA distinguished budget award (19th year) for annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014. " Generated approximately $4.8 million in additional Measure A sales tax revenue since the engagement of a firm in January 2008 to provide sales tax audit services in order to detect and correct sales tax reporting errors. " Participated in numerous small business networking activities and met with potential DBE and SBE vendors. Major Initiatives Finance and Accounting The commercial paper program has been in place for 10 years and has provided short-term, advance funding for projects included in the 2009 Measure A and related Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. Commission management will continue to consider appropriate uses of commercial paper to advance 2009 Measure A projects. The current credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper program is $60,000,000. The existing letter of credit and reimbursement agreement with State Street Bank expires in October 2017. In connection with the 2009 variable rate bonds, the Commission's current SBPAs with BTMU expire in March 2019. The Commission will monitor the credit quality of the banks providing these liquidity facilities for any actions which may affect the short-term ratings of the commercial paper program and 2009 Bonds. Staff maintains a comprehensive financing plan to support the highway and rail capital projects to be delivered through 2019 and to assess future financing requirements. This financing plan incorporates revised sales tax revenue forecasts as well as other potential federal, state, and local revenue sources, including tolls. Based on the updated cost estimates for these projects and identified revenues, potential project funding shortfalls may result in project deferrals or require alternative financing strategies. Financing alternatives to be considered include commercial paper, long-term bond issues to finance Measure A and toll projects, and federal loan programs. Similar to the 91 Project financing, the Commission's financial team will develop a plan of finance for the 1-15 Express Lanes project considering such financing alternatives with the objective to submit a letter of interest for a TIFIA loan in fall 2015 and subsequently receive an invitation to submit an application for the loan. In connection with the 91 Project financing, a master custodian agreement for the collection of toll and other revenues related to the 91 Express Lanes operations will be developed together with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). A joint procurement for a master custodian will be conducted prior to the beginning of toll operations on the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. As a result of the significant financing proceeds received in connection with the 91 Project plan of finance, the Commission has invested such funds with the advice and assistance of an investment management and advisory firm. Operating funds available for investment are coordinated with the assistance of a second investment management and advisory firm. Investments are made in accordance with the Commission's priorities of safety, liquidity, and then yield. The investment managers and advisors will continuously review the Commission's investment policy for any required updates and other recommendations. To ensure that the Commission receives the proper amount of Measure A sales taxes, the Commission will continue to engage a firm to conduct sales tax audit services. The firm will also provide quarterly sales tax analysis and reporting services, of which a summary report is presented to the Commission on a quarterly basis. The Commission will also continue to engage a consultant to provide semi-annual sales tax forecasts for use in the development of revenue projections for the annual budget process and comprehensive financing plan updates. The Finance Department will continue to keep abreast of GASB technical activities affecting the Commission's accounting and financial reporting activities. Various new standards, including pension plan accounting and financial reporting standards will be considered for implementation as part of the preparation of the CAFR for the year ended June 30, 2015. The Finance Department will also continue to consider changes to accounting and financial reporting related to the commencement of toll operations in FY 2016/17 and will continue to assess financial policies, procedures, and reporting and ensure proper internal control. Consultants may be engaged to assist staff in the development of efficient accounting and reporting processes, administrative cost allocation alternatives, and development of an investor relations page on the Commission's website. The Finance Department will continue to update its ERP system that integrates data processing across the Commission, automate administrative processes, and embrace data integration. The continued ERP efficiency gains include an automated paperless workflow system, advanced project accounting, multi -year budgeting, multi -year contract management, grant tracking, and readily available scanned images that can be retrieved by all users. Procurement Management A centralized procurements process will continue to be implemented to manage requests for proposals, qualifications, invitations for bids, small purchases, and related contract administration issues. The Procurement Policy Manual reflects best practices and applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and it will be revised during FY 2015/16 to reflect current best practices, laws, and regulations. The procurement system has strengthened controls to ensure consistency in the development and application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable laws and regulations, especially those related to federal and state grants. Procurement utilizes PlanetBids to assist staff in its efforts to administer and manage an efficient procurement process and conduct outreach to small businesses and DBEs for Commission projects and programs. PlanetBids is a web -based vendor and bid management software. The PlanetBids e-procurement application helps streamline the complete bidding process and enables the collection and analysis of all aspects of vendor data, purchasing activities, and corresponding history. PlanetBids has provided a better service and convenience to vendors and automatically notifies potential vendors of bid alerts. In order to improve the efficiency and productivity of resources, the Commission will outsource the administration of the insurance certificate tracking process related to agreements utilizing automation beginning in FY 2015/16. Procurement Management is responsible for developing, implementing, and monitoring DBE and SBE program requirements in coordination with contractors and other appropriate officials. Duties and responsibilities include establishing DBE attainment goals, monitoring reporting and utilization by contractors, gathering and reporting statistical data and other information as required, reviewing third party contracts and purchase requisitions for compliance with the program, ensuring that bid notices and requests for proposals are made available to DBEs and SBEs in a timely manner, reporting to and advising the Executive Director and Commission on DBE and SBE matters, and providing outreach to DBEs and SBEs to fully advise them of contracting opportunities. Additionally, the Commission recognizes the vital role that local businesses play in the County, and it strongly encourages, supports, and promotes the participation of local businesses in providing goods and services to the Commission. Procurement is committed to providing contracting opportunities to local businesses to strengthen the County's local economy and to promote the development of the small, local business community. During FY 2015/16 the Commission will jointly host a small business expo with the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency and participate in other outreach events in order to acquaint potential local, small, and disadvantaged businesses with the Commission's procurement procedures and opportunities. Staff also consults with the Commission's insurance broker in procuring competitive quotes, on an annual basis, for various insurance coverages secured by the Commission in order to provide cost effective solutions to meet its diverse insurance needs. During FY 2015/16, the Commission will complete a risk study to determine the adequacy of Commission coverage for various risk exposures. Department Goals Protect the Commission's cash resources by regular monitoring of investment practices to ensure consistency with established investment policy. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Utilize investment management and advisory services to prudently invest operating and capital funds in accordance with the Commission's investment policies. " Achieve a rate of return at least equal to the County of Riverside Treasury Pool rate for operating funds. " Establish an appropriate benchmark for the investment of debt proceeds and excess operating funds. Manage the Commission's outstanding debt ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations and continued investor awareness and receptivity to the Commission's program. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Provide an annual update and review of the debt programs with one or more of the rating agencies no later than June 30, 2016. " Meet continuing disclosure requirements of the sales tax and toll revenue debt programs and comply with the TIFIA loan reporting requirements. " Enhance the Commission's website to provide timely and useful information to investors. " Prepare arbitrage calculations as required. Ensure the Commission and funding recipients comply with Measure A and TDA laws and regulations as they relate to the annual financial and compliance audits as well as close cooperation and coordination with independent auditors. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Minimize the number of substantive management letter comments and compliance findings requiring corrective action by the Commission. " Maintain appropriate fiduciary review and monitoring procedures for Measure A recipient and TDA claimant audits. Maintain fiscal and budgetary control through monitoring of periodic results and ensuring consistency with the Commission's strategic direction. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Obtain the GFOA Distinguished Budget Award for the FY 2015/16 budget. " Facilitate a comprehensive budgeting approach that effectively involves management staff, requiring full accountability for all department expenditures. " Fund 100% of the actuarially determined contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. Assure fiscal accountability for Commission funds with general ledger accounting and financial reporting consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Ensure proactive communication and timely responses to any noted errors, corrections, and budget transfers related to program management reviews of accounting and budget information. " Obtain an unmodified opinion on the basic financial statements. " Receive financial reporting excellence award from the GFOA related to the preparation and issuance of the CAFR. " Stay abreast of finance, accounting, and financial reporting developments by attending training and conferences in these general areas or in specialized areas applicable to job duties. " Commence planning for the implementation of the new GASB accounting and reporting standards for pension plans. " Update and maintain the fiscal policies and procedures manual. " Update and maintain complete accounting desk procedures manual for ERP system to facilitate cross training. " Assist local governments with Measure A funding by providing timely allocation of funds for eligible projects and financing opportunities to the extent funding does not impact other programs and is financially feasible and prudent. " Maintain ERP system to reflect technical updates and current technology. " Develop accounting and financial processes with the operator of the 91 Express Lanes and OCTA in preparation for start of toll operations on the RCTC 91 Express Lanes in 2017. Develop and maintain an organizational accountability program encompassing financial and operational functions. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Establish and implement measures related to oversight, fraud, internal control, and ethics. • Issue annual disclosure statements related to financial and operational responsibilities. • Continue to revise and develop finance and accounting policies and procedures that reflect the requirements of federal, state, and local requirements and the Commission's operating practices. Procure goods and services from qualified consultants, contractors, and other vendors in accordance with laws and regulations at a competitive price. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Assist departments and programs to procure and obtain goods and services in a cost effective and efficient manner. • Ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with a comprehensive Procurement Policy Manual. • Ensure that agreements, amendments, and MOUs are entered into with appropriate legal considerations. • Process agreements, amendments, and MOUs in a timely and efficient manner. • Ensure that consistent procedures, processes, and tools are used for procurements. Review existing procurement policies and procedures. (Policy Goal: Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Ensure that the procurement polices reflect Commission requirements and practices. • Segregate policies and procedures so that procedures can be easily updated without Commission approval. • Ensure that procurement policies and procedures reflect the requirements of the Commission's federal, state, and other funding sources. • Continue to provide an easy to read desktop quick procurement policies reference guide for use by Commission staff. • Maximize the value received for the Commission's expenditure of public funds. • Provide all vendors an equal opportunity to provide needed goods and/or services. Finance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Sales tax revenue bond rating Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Toll revenue bond rating BBB -/BBB- BBB -/BBB- BBB -/BBB- BBB-/BBB- TIFIA loan rating BBB- BBB- BBB- BBB - Commercial paper rating P-1/A-1 P-1/A-1 P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ GFOA Certificate of Achievement Awarded Awarded Awarded Awarded GFOA Distinguished Budget Award Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Invoices processed 5,800 6,432 6,100 6,200 Checks processed 4,000 4,420 4,100 4,200 Audit adjustments 0 0 0 0 Average yield on investments 0.25% operating/ 0.75% debt proceeds 0.63% operating/ 0.93% debt proceeds 0.25% operating/ 0.75% debt proceeds 0.25% operating/ 0.75% debt proceeds Payroll hours processed 89,000 88,496 85,300 86,900 Accounts receivable invoices processed 160 197 200 200 Agreements processed 220 385 350 370 Planning and Programming Mission Statement: "To exert leadership in transportation planning and the programming of funds to improve mobility, foster environmental stewardship, expedite project delivery, and form partnerships with regional, state, and federal agencies resulting in maximum returns on local investment. Support a coordinated regional approach to solving transportation funding issues." Chart 29 - Planning and Programming Transfers Out 0% Expenditures Professional Costs 3% Support Costs 0% Planning and Programming expenditures of $6,614,400 have increased 4% from last year's budget (Table 52). Salaries and benefits represent 17% of total expenditures and reflect a change in FTEs, a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs, and a 4% pool for merit - based salary increases. Professional services totaling $168,000 have decreased 53% due to completion of the new urbanism/walkability grant activities in FY 2014/15. Professional services include CMP implementation efforts, air quality analysis, project database management, local and regional planning activities, on -call goods movement consultants, and legal services. Support costs increased by 13% or $2,700 and include various membership dues and staff -related travel costs. Projects and operations costs have increased 16% primarily due to a strategic assessment. Transfers out reflect a decrease of 90% due to the conclusion of funding for organizational and rail studies. Table 52 - Planning and Programming Expenditure Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 864,400 $ 983,700 $ 922,400 Professional Costs Legal Services 16,100 16,000 10,000 Professional Services- General 242,600 338,000 265,000 Total Professional Costs 258,700 354,000 275,000 Support Costs 16,600 20,600 17,100 Projects and Operations Construction 1,250,000 1,250,000 Special Studies 81,700 550,000 250,000 Operating and Capital Disbursements 1,326,700 2,722,500 1,360,700 Total Projects and Operations 1,408,400 4,522,500 2,860,700 Transfers Out - 500,000 200,000 TOTAL Planning and Programming $ 2,548,100 $ 6,380,800 $ 4,275,200 $ 1,114,100 13,000 155,000 168,000 23,300 500,000 1,514,000 3,245,000 5,259,000 50,000 S 6Mg 400 $ 130,400 13% (3,000) -19% (183,000) -54% (186,000) -53% 2,700 13% (750,000) -60% 964,000 175% 522,500 19% 736,500 16% (450,000) -90% $ 233,600 4% Planning and Programming Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Administrative Assistant 0.41 0.33 Chief Financial Officer 0.01 0.03 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.01 0.11 Deputy Executive Director 0.03 0.00 Executive Director 0.49 0.42 Goods Movement Manager 0.97 0.70 Government Relations Manager 0.00 0.04 Management Analyst 1.08 1.00 Planning & Programming Director 0.89 0.77 Planning & Programming Manager 1.00 0.69 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.01 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.00 Project Development Director 0.03 0.00 Public Affairs Manager 0.00 0.05 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 0.94 FTE 5.92 5.09 Department Budget Overview Department Description 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.48 0.90 0.00 1.04 0.90 0.82 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.23 0.99 5.58 The Commission is responsible for short- and long-range transportation planning and programming. Short-range planning and programming involves the development of the five-year STIP and preparation of the five-year FTIP for Riverside County. These programming documents identify projects and their respective funding and schedules. The Commission's involvement with long-range planning efforts includes the coordination and input into planning efforts throughout the County and southern California region. These efforts involve participation in local, bi- county, and regional corridor studies, including the continued development of the CETAP corridors. Regional planning efforts are incorporated in the RTP (a 30-year transportation plan) developed by SCAG in conjunction with county transportation commissions, sub -regional agencies, local agencies, transit operators, and other interested parties. The SCAG 2012 RTP incorporated a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) required under SB375. The SCS component establishes goals for projects, programs, and land -use designed to reduce GHG emissions. The Commission is responsible for approving projects for Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds in Western County and coordinating with Caltrans on the selection of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds as part of the STIP approved by the CTC every two years. The Commission has delegated the authority to nominate projects for RIP funds in the Coachella Valley to CVAG. A MOU between the city of Blythe, representing Palo Verde Valley, and the Commission allows the city to trade RIP funds for local Measure A sales tax funds. In November 2006, Proposition 1B was approved by the voters of California, which provided $20 billion in transportation infrastructure funding. Various program categories were established including a $2 billion infusion into the STIP. Other competitive program categories included CMIA and TCIF; Riverside County was successful in receiving CMIA funding for the SR-91 HOV lanes and 1-215 widening projects, which are currently under construction. TCIF funding was approved for 11 grade separation projects and a ground access improvement project at the I-215/Van Buren interchange. The Commission is a member of the Southern California Consensus Group that developed and submitted project proposals for the TCIF program. As with the RIP and IIP funds, Proposition 1B funds are administered and allocated by the CTC. Proposition 1B funds were instrumental during the economic recession as they became the most reliable state funding source for transportation projects. The deadline to award Proposition 1B CMIA projects expired at the end of 2013. State Local Partnership Program (SLPP) funding is another program authorized by Proposition 1B. A formula program was established for transportation agencies that administer self-help transportation sales tax programs. Riverside County's formula share over the five-year program was $58.941 million. SLPP funds were required to be programmed for construction and matched by the sales tax on a 50-50 basis. The Commission approved three projects in Western County, and CVAG selected six projects in the Coachella Valley. SLPP fund allocation requests were submitted and approved by the CTC at its June 2013 meeting. Programming specifically involves the development, review, and approval of projects for various funding programs. Additionally, programming involves the monitoring of projects from project selection through construction close- out. In order to receive federal funds and approvals, all projects funded with federal and state dollars, or local projects that are regionally significant, must be included in the RTP and FTIP. SCAG is responsible for incorporating all six county (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) transportation improvement programs into one regional programming document and conducting a conformity analysis with the adopted air plans to ensure compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The RTP/SCS is updated every four years, and the FTIP update effort is performed every 18 to 24 months. Multiple amendments occur within each FTIP cycle; the RTP amendment is less frequent as it involves an air quality conformity analyses. FTIP amendments can occur for minor project changes that do not affect the conformity analysis. The Commission is responsible for allocating the following local, state, and federal funding sources: Local Sources: • 1989 and 2009 Measure A sales tax • Western County TUMF regional arterial program State Sources: • SB821 bicycle and pedestrian projects • RIP • ATP • Proposition 1B* Federal Sources: • Congressional discretionary programs, such as ARRA* • STP • CMAQ Fund sources denoted by (*) have expired with the exception of Proposition 1B TCIF funds that have project savings of approximately $5.7 million available for Riverside County projects that can start construction by December 2016. The Commission also serves as the CMA for the County and is responsible for developing and updating the CMP. The CMP was developed to meet state legislation and federal Congestion Management System (CMS) requirements, which includes an enhanced traffic monitoring system. The CMP's highways and regional arterials are regularly monitored to ensure that they are operating at acceptable levels (above Level of Service (LOS) "F"). If a deficiency occurs along the CMP system, a deficiency plan must be prepared that identifies mitigation measures and/or projects that will improve the LOS to "E" or higher. Partnership development, public and private, is critical to the Commission's continued success in affecting positive transportation decisions to meet future demands. Commission staff works in close coordination with its partners to advocate for federal, state, and local funding to improve mobility and mitigate the impacts of goods movement. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue its efforts in working with transportation partners to streamline and improve project delivery. " Consultant contracts are maintained to provide assistance with the CMP, air quality analysis, project database management, and other related planning activities. " The Commission will utilize all available funding sources on transportation projects identified in the 1989 Measure A and the 2009 Measure A as well as other regional high priority projects, including TUMF regional arterial projects and grade separation projects. " The Commission will continue participation in local, bi-county, and regional planning efforts representing the interests of the County. " The Commission will work with the CTC, Caltrans, SCAG, and local project sponsors to implement projects funded with STIP/RIP, ATP, or other available fund sources to ensure that the programming and allocations are consistent with project schedules. " The Commission will continue to assist local project sponsors with the processing of state and federal funding approvals/obligations/allocations and overall project delivery. Accomplishments " Processed 22 STIP actions that consisted of, but were not limited to: ATP Cycle 1 awards, financial allocations, and TCIF cost adjustment. " Completed four local agency agreements and/or amendments for the implementation of TUMF regional arterial projects. " Processed over227 project amendments into the 2013 and 2015 FTIP. " Coordinated with Caltrans and project sponsors regarding the obligation of federal and state funding, met obligation deadlines, and prevented loss of funding to the County. " Received an additional $2.44 million of federal funds in FY 2013/14 through the August 2014 redistribution from other states that did not obligate 100 percent of their obligation authority (OA). " Monitored federal funding expenditures of inactive projects to ensure funds are not deobligated. " Advised local agencies and coordinated the use of toll credits and local match waiver for federally funded projects funded at the maximum reimbursement level, saving the Commission and local agencies up to $7.2 million in local match funds programmed in FY 2014/15. " Reviewed and approved the Measure A five-year capital improvement plans (CIP) for each local agency in the County. " Worked with SCAG and southern California agencies to develop ATP funding distribution recommendations for the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) region. " Monitored expansion projects for each of the Ports. " Monitored TCIF project development to ensure timely completion of the 11 grade separations and a ground access improvement project to improve the I-215/Van Buren interchange as required for the $162.7 million Proposition 1B TCIF funds. TCIF projects completed to date include grade separations at Columbia Avenue, Iowa Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, and the I-215/Van Buren interchange. Eight additional grade separation projects are under construction: Auto Center Drive, Avenue 52, Avenue 56/Airport Boulevard, Clay Street, Magnolia Avenue, Riverside Avenue, Streeter Avenue and Sunset Avenue. " Continued to take a leadership role and work collaboratively with the five -county consensus working group, Mobility 21, SCAG's Southern California National Freight Gateway Collaboration, and the Coalition for America's Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC) on goods movement issues. " Updated the SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program with new evaluation criteria, evaluation committee composition, and adopted policies. Major Initiatives Each county transportation commission throughout the State is responsible for programming RIP funds, which represents 75% of the total STIP funding available statewide for capital enhancement projects. The 75% funding level is then further distributed with 60% of the funds allocated to southern California and 40% to northern California. A population formula is then applied to determine county funding levels called "county shares." The Commission is responsible for ensuring that projects funded with STIP funding are administered and implemented consistent with CTC and Caltrans policies. It is the Commission's policy to set aside 2% off the top for staff support to carry out STIP PPM activities. The remaining RIP funds are further distributed geographically among Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley per the Commission's intra-county STIP formula. The Commission also may consider a call for projects for RIP discretionary funds. Federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds will be administered through the CTC similar to STIP funds under the State's new ATP that was created by SB99 and AB101 to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. Federal TAP funds are not subject to general fund diversions; however, TAP funds are authorized each year by the passage of the state budget. TUMF funds are collected and administered by WRCOG. Approximately half of the TUMF funds collected are set aside for WRCOG's zone arterial projects and regional transit facilities. After the deduction of an administrative fee, WRCOG provides the other half of the TUMF revenues to the Commission. These funds are further distributed to the Commission's TUMF CETAP corridors and regional arterial programs. In September 2004, the Commission established a five-year program and approved the programming of 23 regional arterial projects. To date, $100 million has been programmed for TUMF regional arterial projects. Due to fluctuating TUMF revenues over the past few years, $14.5 million in 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial (MARA) funds and $25.5 million in TUMF CETAP funds were programmed on two projects to fulfill the TUMF commitment. Of the 23 TUMF regional arterial projects, 13 projects have completed construction, seven projects are currently under construction or in pre -construction, and three projects are in the development phase and remain to be programmed for future TUMF funds. Planning and Programming also manages the 2009 Western County MARA program and to date approximately $40 million has been programmed. The expenditures for these regional arterial capital projects are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. Transportation Planning The Commission's role in planning throughout the year will involve working with FHWA, FTA, Caltrans, SCAG, sub - regional agencies, local agencies, and the other county transportation commissions in the region on various planning efforts relative to the implementation of the 2012 RTP/SCS and development of the 2016 RTP/SCS, corridor studies, goods movement studies, and efforts to update transportation computer models and project databases. In addition, planning will be involved with the development of the Commission's strategic assessment effort. In FY 2015/16 the Commission will continue its work efforts on the intra-county CETAP corridors. An updated environmental document and project report has been prepared for the Mid County Parkway project to address changes made to the project limits, which are now between SR-79 and 1-215. The recirculated/supplemental draft environmental document was released for public review and comment in January 2013. Additional quantitative analysis for air quality, GHG emissions, and climate change effects for Mid County Parkway was released for public review in January 2014. Federal NEPA/MOU signatory agency concurrence for the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative for Alternative 9 Modified was received in February 2014. Final project approval and conclusion of the environmental phase is expected by summer 2015, followed by the beginning of work on the design phase. Work on a portion of the north -south CETAP corridor and 1-215 south widening project was completed in November 2012. The 1-215 central widening project is 80% complete, and improvements to the French Valley Parkway interchange is being led by the city of Temecula. Given funding constraints, work on the two inter -county CETAP corridors by the Commission is not expected in this fiscal year. The 2015 CMP update effort will involve updating the CMP (as required by federal CMP regulations). The update will involve an analysis of the level of service on the CMP system, review and incorporation of any new state and federal requirements, and aligning requirements for consistency with the RTP/SCS. Transportation Programming As mentioned above, the Commission is responsible for allocating various local, state and federal funds. These funds are monitored to ensure that regulations are adhered to in order to prevent funds from lapsing. The following summarizes the status of these funding programs: Local Funding Western County TUMF Regional Arterial Program Project monitoring of TUMF regional arterial projects by Planning and Programming staff will occur according to the agreements between local agencies and the Commission. In addition, Commission staff will work with local agencies regarding amendments to agreements and any issues regarding project delivery. To date, project agreements have been executed totaling approximately $100 million of TUMF regional arterial funds. By the end of FY 2015/16, the majority of expenditures will have been reimbursed to local agencies for TUMF regional arterial projects. These project expenditures are included in the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. Project programming for the remaining projects will be forwarded to the Commission and will be based on project readiness and funding availability. Staff will coordinate future programming of additional TUMF regional arterial projects with WRCOG and local agency staff. 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial Program During the 2014 multi -funding call for projects, an additional $24 million of MARA funds were approved for five projects in Western Riverside County. Prior to the call, $40 million of MARA funds were programmed on six projects. Of the 11 total MARA funded projects, five are under construction and six will begin construction by end of FY 2015/16. 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads In order to receive Measure A local streets and roads funding, each year local jurisdictions are required to submit their five-year CIP based on Measure A revenue projections. Additionally, the local jurisdictions are required to submit a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) certification consistent with adopted MOE guidelines and participate in the MSHCP and in the local agency's respective TUMF program, as applicable. Amendments to CIPs are processed administratively for minor changes that do not affect the total programmed amount or are within budget levels. Significant changes require Commission approval. State Funding STI P/RIP/II P Proposition 1B provided funding for STIP projects and other bond program categories such as CMIA, TCIF, and SLPP. However, with the expiration of these programs, the STIP remains unsteady without the identification of a new fund source dedicated to transportation improvements or an increase in the gasoline tax. This year Commission staff will continue to deliver projects programmed in the STIP and work with local agencies to ensure that bond funds are allocated and expended by the respective deadlines. Staff will also be involved with the development and implementation of current and future ATP cycles, working with the CTC, Caltrans, SCAG, and regional transportation planning agencies to ensure projects in Riverside County are successful in this funding program. 56821 SB821 projects are funded by 2% of LTF revenues; the expenditures under this program are included in the LTF special revenue fund, which is reflected in the Public and Specialized Transit Department since this fund's activities related primarily to transit funding. Call for projects are held on a biennial basis. Federal Funding CMAQ STP, and TAP/ATP The Commission is responsible for allocating CMAQ and STP funds to transportation projects in the County. The Commission selects and approves CMAQ funds apportioned to the South Coast Air Basin and STP funds through a Call for Projects in addition to programming funds for Measure A projects. The Commission delegates the selection of projects for CMAQ funds apportioned to the Salton Sea Air Basin to CVAG. In 2007, the Commission approved 25% of future CMAQ and STP funds for grade separation projects. In January 2014, the Commission approved projects through a multi -funding call for projects, which included 18 CMAQ projects totaling $56 million and 10 STP projects totaling $63 million. Through SB99 and AB101 the State developed the ATP, which consolidated federal TAP and state funding that traditionally funded bicycle and pedestrian projects. The ATP is administered by the CTC and is designed to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation such as biking and walking. Staff has been involved with the development of the guidelines and participates in workshops and through the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies group to represent the County's best interest in this new funding program. Project Monitoring The high demand for reporting and monitoring the progress of projects is essential to prevent funds from lapsing. The programming project database, Fundtrack, allows for efficient monitoring of project schedules and funding. Local agencies have been provided access to project information as well as the capability to update their respective project information in a timely manner. The Planning and Programming Department provides assistance to the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department and local agencies by participating in regular project delivery team meetings and preparing and submitting requests for authorization (RFA)/allocation of federal and state funding. In addition, staff monitors allocation and award deadlines, expenditures, project closeouts, and inactive projects of federal and state funded projects to prevent loss of funds. Regional Issues The Commission's work effort will remain focused on facilitating ongoing commitments as well as being responsive to various emerging issues. These include bi-county issues with the counties of San Bernardino, Orange, Imperial, and San Diego as well as goods movement. The Commission will continue working with partners from the Southern California Consensus Group (Ports, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority, SANBAG, OCTA, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Ventura County Transportation Commission, SCAG, and SCRRA) regarding goods movement issues. A priority will be to coordinate with legislative staff and advocacy groups such as Mobility 21 and CAGTC to secure funding through the federal transportation bill for goods movement -related needs such as the funding of Alameda Corridor East grade separations in the County and/or the creation of a federal freight trust fund, or similar program with a dedicated and firewalled revenue structure, in order to treat the nation's multimodal national goods movement network as a system rather than individual projects. The Commission will continue to monitor the Ports' projects for possible impacts on Riverside County by reviewing agendas and requesting notices for projects under CEQA and the Brown Act. Department Goals Build upon relationships with local, state, and federal agencies to coordinate short- and long-range planning to ensure that transportation projects receive funding and approvals. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Work with CVAG, WRCOG, Caltrans, transit operators, local agencies, and SCAG to coordinate project amendments to the RTP and/or FTIP. • Provide the Commissioners information to assist in advocating Commission projects. • Continue CETAP intra-county corridor work. • Continue working with the RCA to implement the MSHCP. • Maintain maximum flexibility in project selection for MAP-21 fund sources to serve the diverse needs of Riverside County. Continue to seek a stronger role for county transportation commissions in state and regional transportation and air quality programs in order to direct funding for programs and projects that will improve air quality and mobility in Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Support efforts to seek additional funding at the local, state, and federal levels for projects that improve air quality. • Support ongoing efforts to regulate federal emission sources. • Support efforts that allow more flexibility in funding transit operating and capital costs. Continue implementation of the CMP in cooperation with SCAG, WRCOG, CVAG, Caltrans, and local agencies and maintain federal certification for the CMP. (Policy Goal: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Implement the CMP to meet federal CMS requirements cited under the metropolitan planning organization (i.e., SCAG) planning regulations, and consistency with the RTP/SCS. • Provide data collected on the CMP system to SCAG and Caltrans for reporting on the Highway Performance Monitoring System. • Provide data collected on the CMP system to local agencies and other interested parties. • Continue monitoring the CMP system to ensure the minimum adopted LOS threshold is met. Continue working with Caltrans to monitor traffic conditions for the purpose of focusing transportation funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies. (Policy Goal: System Efficiencies) Objectives: • Review Caltrans' Performance Monitoring System count data to infill CMP segments that currently do not have smart call boxes or loop detectors to monitor traffic. • Identify congested corridors for potential funding opportunities. Continue to advocate for jobs/housing balance and attracting high income jobs to Riverside County in addition to addressing intercounty congestion. (Policy Goal: Economic Development) Objectives: • Participate in ongoing studies and activities to improve the job market and housing demand in Riverside County. • Support the County interests pertaining to transportation planning as population, job, and housing forecasts are developed by SCAG and the State. Maintain Fundtrack project database and support of SCAG regional database to allow for efficient monitoring of projects and funding obligations with the ability to share project information with local jurisdictions. (Policy Goals: Communications, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Maintain consultant contract to manage and host the Commission's web -based project management database. • Work with SCAG and other county transportation commissions to refine and maintain the SCAG regional database (FTIP) including updates to the regional transportation model. • Coordinate with Caltrans to assure database compatibility and promote information sharing including timely reporting of fund obligation information. Ensure maximum funding and flexibility for projects funded with STIP-RIP, Proposition 1B, ATP, and federal MAP-21 funds. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Goods Movement) Objectives: • Participate in statewide efforts to implement projects and fully utilize all available funds from Proposition 1B funding programs. • Work with Caltrans and the CTC to oversee the implementation/completion of Proposition 1B programs (including CMIA, TCIF, and SLPP). • Advocate that regions that program local and federal funds to replace state funding or advance an allocation due to state budget issues (or limited allocation capacity) be given high priority for repayment when funds are available, or in future programming in the next STIP programming cycle. • Participate in various state and federal forums to increase funding levels, streamline programming and allocation processes, and provide flexibility in obligating funds. • Support efforts advocating the continuation and protection of state transportation funding and the payback of loans taken from state transportation accounts. • Advocate that RIP county share reserves receive priority programming over counties that advance shares. • Continue to strategically program and fund projects to meet local, state, and federal goals and to obligate and/or allocate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding. • Participate in Southern California Programming Roundtable meetings to ensure that 100% of federal OA for CMAQ and STP funding is obligated within the SCAG region. • Participate at CTC and Caltrans forums in preparing and evaluating ATP projects for the statewide and MPO funding programs. • Continue to monitor project implementation through the use of milestone reporting on a quarterly basis to maintain maximum funding levels for projects and prevent loss of funds to Riverside County. • Monitor and influence the development of the National Freight Network required under MAP-21. Provide support to the Commission's Capital Project Development and Delivery and Finance departments to maintain project funding and schedules and minimize programming issues. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Provide input to the budget development process. • Attend regular meetings with the Capital Projects Delivery Department. • Serve in an oversight role regarding project reporting, invoicing and close-outs. • Coordinate project RFA/OA packages. • Monitor progress of project milestones and RFAs as they are processed through Caltrans headquarters and FHWA. • Prepare CTC allocation requests, extensions, and amendments for STIP and Proposition 1B funded projects. Provide assistance to local agencies to facilitate and streamline project delivery. (Policy Goals: Mobility & Communications) Objectives: • Continue coordination of TAC meetings. • Provide information regarding project programming data, including funding status, to project sponsors on a quarterly basis. • Provide local agencies with recommendations on project programming to minimize unnecessary requirements and delays. • Upon request, attend local agency project delivery team meetings to provide advice on programming issues. • Meet regularly with Caltrans local assistance staff to monitor project submittals and resolve project implementation and obligation issues. • Assist local agencies in preparing RFAs, STIP submittals, and inactive reporting justifications. Continue to work with state and federal agencies to streamline processes for funding and project approvals. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship & Communications) Objectives: • Maintain relationships with key staff at regional, state and federal agencies. • Participate in SCAG's National Freight Gateway Collaboration to define a system that meets the region's long- term mobility, safety, environmental, and energy needs including developing a brand specific to goods movement projects in southern California. • Identify problematic areas with project delivery and/or programming and work with federal lobbyists to develop solutions for streamlining and clarifying processes for the next federal transportation bill. • Participate in regional, state, and federal forums addressing issues related to project programming, implementation, and air quality conformity. Facilitate development of regional transportation solutions that benefit Riverside County, including implementation of Proposition 1B TCIF projects and the Commission's Grade Separation Plan. (Policy Goals: Goods Movement, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objective: • Monitor progress made in constructing the TCIF-funded projects through discussions with staff from partner agencies including Caltrans; cities of Banning, Coachella, Corona, and Riverside; and the County. Timely completion of the TCIF projects is required to demonstrate the region's ability to deliver projects consistent with the CTC's direction when the Proposition 1B funding was allocated. Determine where future efforts regarding addressing Riverside County goods movement issues would prove most effective. (Policy Goal: Goods Movement) Objectives: • Identify drivers of demand for goods movement services and performance of modal systems and services as well as public benefits, specific areas of inefficiency, and the impacts of goods movement on communities. • Implement the Commission's 2012 Grade Separation Funding Strategy through coordination of advocacy efforts with the Legislative Affairs and Communications Department. Facilitate public and private investments in clean air technology in support of the broader air quality programs for SCAG, SCAQMD, and Riverside County local entities. (Policy Goal: Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Monitor the impact of AB32 (GHG emission reduction) application to Commission transportation projects. • Monitor the impact of SB375 (GHG emission reduction) from light trucks and automobiles through the implementation of the 2012 RTP/SCS. • Actively participate on the MSRC's TAC to ensure equitable funding is available in support of capital projects within Riverside County. Planning and Programming Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Federal projects monitored for obligation authority delivery 44 16 43 21 TUMF Regional Arterial projects monitored for implementation/expenditures 20 20 20 23 TUMF agreements/amendments 5 3 4 4 MARA projects monitored for implementation/expenditures N/A 5 11 16 MARA agreements/amendments N/A 3 6 5 FTIP amended projects 160 138 180 165 STIP/Proposition 1B programming, allocations, amendments, and extensions for Commission projects/local agency projects 10 13 14 15 Rail Mission Statement: "To develop and support passenger rail transportation options for increased mobility within Riverside County and the region." Chart 30 — Rail Salaries and Benefits Capital Outlay 3% 0% Expenditures Professional Costs 7% Rail expenditures of $26,318,000 include Metrolink operations and capital support as well as maintenance and operations of the existing five plus the four new Perris Valley Line Commission -owned and operated commuter rail stations (Table 53). Salaries and benefits reflect a 15% increase and is a result of increased FTE allocations, a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs, and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs, which include legal and consultant services, have increased 44% due to on -call rail consultants who will be used to perform service planning and modeling for rail projects including 91 line/Perris Valley Line expansion and Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor service. Support costs, which reflect an increase of 58%, include station maintenance, media ads, printing services, and marketing incentives. Station maintenance includes property management, utilities, grounds maintenance, repairs, cleaning, and security services at the nine Commission -owned commuter rail stations and adjacent parking areas. Projects and operations expenditures of $20,706,300 increased 47% compared to the previous year's budget and includes station construction planning and development for the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor service and an operating contribution of up to $16,000,000 to SCRRA for Metrolink operations, which includes new Perris Valley Line service. The Commission's commuter rail program intends to utilize existing mechanisms within Metrolink to assess and monitor operations and budget performance. Program operations relate primarily to station operations, and engineering and construction expenditures relate to the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor. Capital outlay reflects a 49% decrease and is due to a reduction in property improvements at the Commission -owned commuter rail stations. Table 53 - Rail Expenditure Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 500,900 $ 662,500 $ 783,800 Professional Costs Legal Services 77,800 168,000 101,800 Professional Services- General 165,200 1,062,400 960,000 Total Professional Costs 243,000 1,230,400 1,061,800 Support Costs 1,080,700 1,910,000 1,202,600 Projects and Operations Program Operations 1,606,000 2,155,700 1,359,800 Engineering 78,200 200,000 Construction 650,000 Special Studies 250,000 250,000 Operating and Capital Disbursements 8,415,600 10,809,000 10,200,000 Total Projects and Operations 10,099,800 14,064,700 11,809,800 Capital Outlay 13,100 135,000 6,800 TOTAL Rail Maintenance and Operations $ 11,937,500 $ 18,002,600 $ 14,864,800 $ 760,600 165,000 1,605,000 1,770,000 3,012,600 2,706,300 250,000 1,200,000 250,000 16,300,000 20,706,300 68,500 $ 26,318,000 $ 98,100 15% (3,000) -2% 542,600 51% 539,600 44% 1,102,600 58% 550,600 26% 50,000 25% 550,000 85% 0% 5,491,000 51% 6,641,600 47% (66,500) -49% $ 8,315,400 46% Rail Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Administrative Assistant 0.06 0.09 Capital Projects Manager 0.26 0.25 Chief Financial Officer 0.10 0.11 Deputy Executive Director 0.04 0.04 Executive Director 0.00 0.00 Facilities Administrator 0.00 0.80 Government Relations Manager 0.00 0.05 Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 Multimodal Services Director 0.25 0.15 Procurement Analyst 0.17 0.16 Procurement Manager 0.17 0.15 Project Delivery Director 0.03 0.05 Public Affairs Manager 0.00 0.00 Rail Manager 1.00 1.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 FTE 3.08 3.85 Department Budget Overview -Rail Operations Department Description 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.04 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.30 0.14 0.25 0.03 0.10 1.00 0.02 4.05 The Commission has directed efforts in the areas of regional commuter rail, intercity passenger rail, high speed rail, and capital improvements to support enhanced passenger and freight rail service. The entire program includes elements of planning, programming, commuter and intercity rail development and support, station and corridor management, mitigation of community and environmental impacts, legislative and regulatory advocacy, and construction of capital projects. Many elements are managed or supported by other Commission departments, legal counsel, and consultants. Departmental efforts contributing to the rail program are found throughout the budget document. Coordination and consultation also occur with a variety of public and private entities including the CTC, Caltrans, California Public Utilities Commission, California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), FRA, FTA, Amtrak, environmental agencies, the University of California, transit providers, SCAG, WRCOG, CVAG, San Diego Association of Governments, LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency, local governments, private freight railroads, businesses, and property owners. The Commission participates in the ongoing funding and governance of Metrolink through SCRRA, a joint powers authority consisting of the county transportation commission's of Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura counties. The Commission holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven member board. Commission staff serves on the five -county TAC which negotiates service and funding levels, based upon the County's established priorities. The TAC provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and Commission departments, and linkages to local communities. Of the seven commuter rail lines operated by Metrolink, three routes consisting of the Riverside, Inland Empire - Orange County (IE0C), and 91/Perris Valley Lines directly serve Western County. Unlike the other SCRRA member agencies, the Commission owns and operates the commuter rail stations serving Riverside County: Riverside Downtown, Pedley, La Sierra, West Corona, and North Main Corona (Chart 31). The Commission is also the owner and will maintain the new stations of Riverside —Hunter Park, Moreno Valley/March Field, Downtown Perris, and South Perris. Station operation and maintenance costs are included in the Rail Department budget with services currently coordinated by the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department through the Facilities Administrator. New and ongoing construction projects at these stations are described in the capital budget managed by the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department. Chart 31— Riverside County Metrolink Station Locations Riverside County Metrolink Service NORTH MAIN CORM STATION t r WEST CORONA STATION CORONA BAN 6ERNARGINO eaaNTr RIYEnsroc coorv, „ HOLEY RIVERSIDE WAITER _ sl STATION �,.STATfON RIVERSIDE .. .� _ DOWNTOWN =�= - STATION MORENOVALLEY) i �l MARCH FIELD RIVERSIDE STATION MOREN0 IA RA VALLEY ST'+ ON EXISTING STATIONS V PROPOSED STATIONS METRDLINK LINE PROPOSED PERRIS VALLEY LINE Id�h DOWNTOWN PERRIS STATION SOUTH PERRIS STATION " 0 I le.M 1 O Lake Perris In addition to Metrolink, the Commission participates in the governance of the LOSSAN Rail Corridor which is a 351-mile network through a six -county coastal region in southern California and is the second busiest intercity passenger rail corridor in the United States. The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is a joint powers authority originally formed in 1989 that works to increase ridership, revenue, capacity, reliability, coordination and safety on the coastal rail line between San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Luis Obispo. The Commission is the newest voting member of the 11-member Board of Directors composed of elected officials representing rail owners, operators, and planning agencies along the rail corridor. The LOSSAN has benefited from recent legislative action to establish more local control over the service. Currently the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is in negotiations with Caltrans to develop a transfer agreement that will enable the transition of and allow LOSSAN to take a broader role in the management and coordination of the southern California rail services. The Commission is involved to promote travel options and connections for our residents and to be engaged in decisions impacting the rail track rights the Commission purchased for commuter rail service. Commission staff also participates in the TAC that provides technical assistance, service planning, and coordination between various agencies to improve customer service. Chart 32 — Southern California Passenger Rail System Map rACIfIC Passenger Roil Sfciion g Arnaok Pacific SurPliner © Mehalink • COASTER O SPRINTER ILigln Roil) Passenger Rail Service - Amtrak Pacific SurHiner Metrolink Ventura County Line - Metrolink Antelope Volley line - Metrolink San Bernardino Line - Mutralink Riverside line Metrallnk91 Line Metrolink Orange Calmly Line Metrolink Inlond Empire - Orange County Line - COASTER - SPRINTER ILighi Rail) JEN1 VRA COUNT) rcrawrr iDRS TeR METR DUNK annvoG[uldurnia.rom GuN[1O rom mairchnAwo.n.rom Southern California Passenger Rail SYSTEM MAP LOS ANGELCS COUNTY am f No M M MIgIM M m M r r ,d ore NI I /r i. �"ya'� D gip„' N 0 5 10 15 20 30 40 Miles Key Assumptions • Metrolink's preliminary FY 2015/16 budget is adopted by the Commission and SCRRA. In the event that additional funds are needed during the budget year, a mid -year budget adjustment will be presented to the Commission for approval. • Ridership and fare revenues continue to grow slightly on the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 Lines (Chart 33). • The Perris Valley Line extension will open and provide new options for Riverside County commuters. • LOSSAN will continue on its path for local control, and the Commission will be an active voting member in the process. Chart 33 — Metrolink Average Daily Ridership 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Accomplishments 2014 2015 2016 WI 91 Line ■ IEOC II Riverside/LA • Developed detailed operating plans and implemented an optimized 91 line service to maximize the benefit of the nine available train slots to Los Angeles. • Initiated early marketing efforts to establish a ridership base for the Perris Valley Line and expanded Metrolink service. • Actively participated as voting membership on the LOSSAN board and continued support of efforts for local control for the southern California intercity rail service. • Continued to implement the recommendations of the comprehensive safety and security assessment and emergency response plan at the Metrolink stations. This includes the construction of a new Operations Control Center for the Riverside Downtown station and establishment of a back up control center at the North Main Corona station. • Continued efforts to manage the security guard contractor to provide protection of Commission assets and a sense of safety and security for riders. Major Initiatives Over the last 22 years, more than $120 million in capital improvements have been made in developing stations and securing access to support the Commission's commuter rail services operations. The Perris Valley Line project will add almost $250 million more in local investment in commuter rail. The project is under construction, and the operations plan will be developed and finalized prior to revenue service in late 2015. The four Perris Valley Line stations (see Chart 31) are currently under construction and have been designed to minimize operating costs. Department Goals —Rail Operations Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving Riverside County. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: • Support improved Metrolink system safety and security initiatives. • Implement enhanced safety and security features at all stations. • Work with Metrolink staff to increase patronage on Riverside County lines, including the new Perris Valley Line. " Continue to expand service on Metrolink lines with increased train frequencies. " Coordinate with Metrolink staff and their current Strategic Plan Initiative to develop future service plans that best meet the needs of Riverside County residents. " Continue to monitor Metrolink's financial performance to ensure Riverside County transportation funds are used efficiently and responsibly. Maximize opportunities for public use of rail -related investment. (Policy Goal: Intermodalism & Accessibility) Objectives: " Support transit operator efforts to expand availability and use of connecting transit in order to improve access and reduce demand on parking capacity; costs associated with transfers are currently reimbursed to the transit operators by the Commission and are budgeted. " Explore track rights opportunities. " Expand opportunities with the Commuter Assistance Program's park and ride operations for the designation of specific car/vanpool/buspool parking at commuter rail stations with available capacity. " Expand opportunities for interline travel through coordination of schedules with LOSSAN and Amtrak intercity trains, such as the Sunset Limited, and other Metrolink lines, including encouraging joint ticketing options. Implement energy efficient systems and generate revenue to offset maintenance costs of rail properties. (Policy Goals: Environmental Stewardship, Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Explore track rights opportunities and potential for joint development opportunities at stations. " Explore the installation of cell phone towers as a revenue source to offset operating costs; including the development of the Pedley station cell tower project. " Explore additional revenue potential at the rail stations. " Evaluate alternative and emergency power systems. Department Budget Overview  Rail Development In order to expand passenger rail options throughout the County, the Commission conducts feasibility studies to assess the viability of commuter rail expansion. In the past, the Commission completed the commuter rail feasibility study that examined the viability of extending Metrolink commuter rail service largely within existing rail right of way. The Commission approved the study and recommended advanced study of extensions on the San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL) to Hemet/San Jacinto and Murrieta/Temecula. The next phase of Alternatives Analysis for these corridors will be pursued in future years as funding availability allows. A Commission strategic assessment is underway that will review rail priorities along with other agency projects. Significant planning efforts are underway to explore intercity passenger rail service to the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass. San Jacinto Branch Line The Commission holds title to and manages the 38-mile SJBL (Chart 34) and several adjacent properties, preserved for future passenger rail service. BNSF Railway (BNSF) holds the freight rights in the corridor, providing service to local shippers, and performs maintenance on the line. Chart 34 — San Jacinto Branch Line Perris Valley Line Small Starts Project In June 2000, the Commission allocated $20 million of Measure A sales tax funds for capital and operating expenditures related to the implementation of passenger rail service on the initial operating segment of the SJBL, known as the Perris Valley Line (see Chart 31). Project cost estimates have been revised and are now approximately $248 million. Staff secured a small starts grant agreement from the FTA Small Starts Program to fund $75 million of the project cost with the balance to be funded by other federal, state, and local funding sources, as illustrated in Table 54 and Chart 35. Details on this capital project are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery section. Chart 35 — Perris Valley Line Funding Chart Table 54 — Perris Valley Line Funding Plan Federal: STP CMAQ FTA 5309 Small Starts FTA 5307 State: STIP Local: Measure A sales tax Total $ 500,000 36,514,263 75,000,000 26,157,453 52,978,000 57,100,869 Total Perris Valley Line Project Estimate $ 248,250,585 The Perris Valley Line has received the required FTA approvals and is currently under construction; the anticipated project completion is December 2015. The project is a 24-mile extension of the 512-mile of Metrolink commuter rail system. It will extend the existing Metrolink 91 Line, which provides service between Riverside and Downtown Los Angeles via Fullerton. There will also be timed connections to the other routes out of the Riverside Downtown station. The project includes the construction of four passenger stations at Riverside —Hunter Park, Moreno Valley/March Field, Downtown Perris, and South Perris; construction of a park -and -ride lot at each of the four new stations, totaling approximately 2,250 parking spaces; and a layover facility at South Perris for vehicle storage and servicing. The hours of operation will be 3:30 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. on weekdays with no scheduled service on weekends. The service will have 12 trains a day between South Perris and Riverside Downtown with connections to IE0C and Riverside Line trains as well. The project is expected to serve 4,300 weekday trips on the entire length of the route. The diversion from private car use to Perris Valley Line ridership is estimated to reduce vehicle miles traveled by approximately 34 million miles per year in the project area. This estimate includes vehicle miles traveled from private homes to the proposed stations. The GHG emission reduction benefits equal 146,600 pounds per day. Chart 36 — Passenger Rail to the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass COACHELLA VALLEY- SAN GORGONIO PASS CORRIDOR RAIL SERVICE In recent years the Commission has also focused attention on the creation of intercity passenger rail service between the Coachella Valley, the Pass Area, Riverside, and the Los Angeles basin through advocacy efforts with state, federal, and local government entities and negotiation with the freight railroads. The Commission was able to ensure the corridor was prominently featured in the updated 2013 California State Rail Plan. The Commission is now taking the lead on the service development process and actively coordinating with all the key stakeholders along the corridor and at the state and federal level with Caltrans and the FRA. In addition, the Commission has secured a letter of agreement with Caltrans for its cooperation and modeling support and is finalizing a MOU with CVAG for its cooperation on the planning as well as funding as part of a new TDA bus/rail split for the Coachella Valley. In May 2013 the Caltrans Division of Rail completed the first phase of a planning study and initial alternatives analysis for the rail corridor. This planning study was very supportive of the potential for a viable service, and future studies can expand on this by determining ridership demand and better cost estimates. Caltrans also included an updated project description and analysis of the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service in the latest state rail plan, which was approved on September 5, 2013 by the State Transportation Agency. The next update will take place in 2017. As the result of the past studies from both CVAG and the Commission, it was determined that using state - supported intercity trains presents the best alternative for developing service along the corridor. The 141-mile trip between Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley would cross four counties. Stops and station locations are yet to be determined. Due to the trip length and time of approximately three hours, Amtrak -style service with larger seats and food service would be more appealing to the riders. In addition, the service would operate over Union Pacific and BNSF tracks, and, in general, Amtrak has a greater ability to initiate service over freight railroads based on a national agreement. The initial service plan would be for two daily round trips along the corridor. The next round of studies will look at various track alignments, routes, and station alternatives and determine ridership forecasts. The primary effort for this will be the initiation of a SDP. The true success of this effort will be to develop comprehensive and convincing planning documents that will allow Coachella Valley rail to compete for limited state and federal rail funds. The project purpose and need will have to be compelling, and the ridership potential thoroughly demonstrated. The FRA staff already made it very clear that several rail alignments and alternatives must be studied and compared in order for the project to be viable. In the July 1, 2010 Federal Register notice on High -Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) program, it clearly outlines the planning process needed to be eligible for HSIPR funds. This process identifies the need for a SDP with the following requirements: • Clearly demonstrate the purpose and need; • Analyze alternatives for the proposed passenger rail service; • Identify the alternative that best meets the purpose and need; • Identify the discrete capital projects required; and • Demonstrate the operational and financial feasibility. The Commission will take the lead on the SDP using Proposition 1B grant funds. The environmental process needed for the NEPA documentation will be conducted and funded with local funds. Commission staff has solicited a highly qualified consulting firm capable of conducting both the SDP and the NEPA documentation in order to expedite project development. This project will be ongoing and is incorporated in the FY 2015/16 budget. The Commission will also create an annual SRTP for the project. Chart 37 — Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass Corridor Rail Service ! J ;Ii14=! yam VI-Ji 3i1:L'i i StAblrl- - - .9JiJ'fY , San aa�h�d \S xwmmr ei�rk +�-- rnardino \ sPriara Montclair Los Angel *.:�`a- Loma Linda/ nion Stet Pomona FhmO+ (.0m, Redlands i.- nnronrr �ON7 • Redlands alley �aM aoa Ontario V r Wand relnu rordroa rl rr i Cali. + cherryvaxey S;Si1 EIDA5Uiiir13i �.) PI ` t3 Riverside s.+omen Pass Ana ` sienna\rorm `7� Downtown ',,,,, 9 cauama xo�aix�ullerton Uv°aN0f0° - st. lee Moreno oerea<x .-a.. 1. Rut Sonora Palm Springs* .9TriliE!.'1 rhoyaina Palm. SP' � LEGEND r_ - SCRRA San Gabriel Sub �- Union Pacific RR Alhambra Sub �- !NSF Railway San Bernardino Sub -Union Pacific RR Yuma Sub Union Pacific RR Los Angeles Sub CATCHMENT AREAS •- ExistingStationAreas - Potential Station Areas J P Cathedral0°r Ranaha Palm Palm Doren meian Wetk inelo la or„,,, Coachella Thermal- Mxta .1/ - - • Not an potential Stations will he needed; construction and alignment alternatives will he determined in the future. High Speed Rail The Commission continues to play a proactive role in the development of a statewide, high speed passenger rail system, including routing of the backbone corridor through the Inland Empire with possible stations in the Riverside/Corona and Murrieta/Temecula areas. With the passage of Proposition 1A in November 2008, there is a proposed funding mechanism to move the state high speed rail project forward. The CHSRA has begun work on a project level environmental assessment and corridor alignment study for the section between Los Angeles and San Diego via the Inland Empire. The Commission has directed the review to include an alignment alternative along I- 15 for analysis. The Commission has entered into a MOU to be supportive in the development of this high speed rail project and is participating in the Southern California Inland Corridor Group meetings. The Commission actively contributed to the development of the supplemental Alternatives Analysis released in spring 2012 and continues to coordinate local participation at Technical Working Group meetings attended by local stakeholders. Work on this effort has slowed down with the release of the latest business plan that extends the development of this Phase II section from Los Angeles to San Diego via the Inland Empire to beyond 2030. The Commission signed a MOU along with the other southern California transportation entities and SCAG to commit $1 billion in unallocated Proposition 1A funds for early investment to be spent locally for rail transportation improvement projects. Key Assumptions • Project construction on the Perris Valley Line will be completed in FY 2015/16. • Progress on the development of the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass Corridor rail service will continue. Accomplishments • Continue significant construction progress on the Perris Valley Line, with revenue service to begin in late 2015. • Initiated Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass Corridor rail SDP and secured grant funding for Phase I of the planning effort. • Developed and submitted a detailed FRA grant application to seek funding for Phase II of the project and environmental efforts, resulting in approval for a $3 million grant. • Conducted public outreach and alternatives analysis for the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass Corridor rail project. Major Initiatives As discussed above, construction related to the Perris Valley Line project is expected to be completed and operations to commence during FY 2015/16. Department Goals —Rail Development Identify and plan for capital improvements necessary to increase the scope, appeal, and reliability of commuter rail operations. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Finish construction and initiate passenger service on the Perris Valley Line. • Explore passenger rail options and conduct detailed studies on the Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass Corridor. • Evaluate high speed rail plans and programs and look for opportunities for early investment that benefit existing passenger rail services. • Continue to review parking requirements and develop plans to address projected parking deficiencies. Maintain efforts with local agencies, other Southern California counties, and the state and federal governments to expand intercity passenger rail service into Riverside County and the Coachella Valley. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Continue to monitor the state efforts in the creation of a high speed passenger rail system along an Inland Empire alignment through coordination with state and local agencies. In addition, continue to identify and advocate for high speed rail funding to be spent on beneficial local rail projects in Riverside County. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Intermodalism & Accessibility) Rail Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Average daily ridership on existing commuter lines • Riverside Line 4,765 4,715 5,193 4,679 • IE0C Line 4,580 4,521 5,101 4,508 • 91 Line 2,337 2,338 3,169 2,317 Farebox recovery ratio • Riverside Line 57.4% 50.1% 55.5% 48.3% • IE0C Line 34.7% 37.6% 33.7% 34.1% • 91 Line 45.3% 51.3% 44.5% 26.0% Public and Specialized Transit Mission Statement: "To coordinate the operation of all public transportation services within the County with a goal toward promoting compliance and improving mobility as well as program efficiency and effectiveness between transit operators. To maintain and improve, as resources allow, mobility options to meet travel needs of seniors, persons with disabilities, and persons of limited means to enhance quality of life through innovative solutions and better coordination of existing services." Chart 38 — Public and Specialized Transit Salaries and Benefits 0% I� Expenditures Public and specialized transit uses are budgeted at $142,841,200 for FY 2015/16, as presented in Table 55, and consist primarily of capital projects and operations costs as well as transfers out to Commission funds for administration, planning, and rail purposes. LTF disbursements consist of transit operating and capital allocations to public transit operators of $80,050,000, bicycle and pedestrian facilities allocations to cities and the County of $1,986,000, and planning and administration allocations to other agencies of $634,500. STA disbursements of $22,280,000 are for bus capital purposes in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. Transfers out comprise $19,790,000 for rail operations and capital, $2,000,000 for grade separation projects, $2,490,000 for planning, and $900,000 for administration. The LTF and STA transit allocations reflect the use of $24,417,300 and $8,962,200 in fund balances, respectively. Measure A disbursements include $2,650,000 for Western County specialized transit funding of the first year of the 2015 three-year call for projects. The majority of other Measure A disbursements relates to other Measure A public transit programs: $800,000 for Western County Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) allocations, $6,298,000 for Coachella Valley public and specialized transit, and $2,320,000 for Western County intercity bus services. The Western County allocations are disbursed monthly to RTA, the major transit provider in the Western County, while the Coachella Valley allocation is disbursed monthly to SunLine, the major transit provider in the Coachella Valley. Table 55 — Public and Specialized Transit Expenditure Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 349,900 $ 381,400 $ 310,400 $ 353,600 $ (27,800) -7% Professional Costs Legal Services 1,400 22,000 16,000 19,000 (3,000) -14% Audit Services 77,000 10,000 - 80,000 70,000 700% Professional Services- General 117,600 160,000 160,000 160,000 - 0% Total Professional Costs 196,000 192,000 176,000 259,000 67,000 35% Support Costs 12,000 22,500 14,700 30,100 7,600 34% Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements 79,899,400 118,712,800 75,480,000 117,018,500 (1,694,300) -1% Total Projects and Operations 79,899,400 118,712,800 75,480,000 117,018,500 (1,694,300) -1% Transfers Out 12,452,900 17,073,000 16,786,500 25,180,000 8,107,000 47% TOTAL Public and Specialized Transit $ 92,910,200 $ 136,381,700 $ 92,767,600 S 142.841.200 $ 6,459,500 5% Public and Specialized Transit Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Administrative Assistant 0.13 0.15 Chief Financial Officer 0.06 0.05 Government Relations Manager 0.00 0.01 Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 Multimodal Services Director 0.23 0.23 Procurement Analyst 0.01 0.01 Transit Manager 1.00 1.00 FTE 2.43 2.45 Department Budget Overview Department Description 0.09 0.04 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 1.00 2.23 The Measure A specialized transit program provides a valuable service to the community by serving the needs of residents, mainly seniors and persons with disabilities, whose transportation needs are not met by traditional services. Specialized transit operations are typically managed by social service and nonprofit agencies. The Commission awards Measure A funds for specialized transit through a competitive call for projects process. In addition, federal grant funds from Jobs Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom were approved by the Commission through the 2013 Universal Call for Projects and will continue to be utilized for projects until the end of June 2015. In July 2012, Congress passed the MAP-21 two-year reauthorization bill which authorized federal funding for public transportation programs. This recent legislation restructured existing funding under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) by consolidating several grant programs, revising project eligibility, and amending funding allocation requirements from discretionary to a formula -based process. Significant changes in MAP-21 include the end of both JARC and New Freedom as distinct programs. Under MAP- 21, JARC-type projects are now eligible activities under the rural (Section 5311) and urban (Section 5307) funding provisions. New Freedom type projects for seniors and people with disabilities will now be allowable under the Section 5310 program. The Commission allocates funding, following a competitive call for projects, through the FTA Section 5310 program that is administered by Caltrans and SCAG. This program provides funding to nonprofit transportation and social service agencies and public operators (under special circumstances) for the purchase of capital equipment as well as operating. Under the consolidated Section 5310 program, eligible activities include transportation projects for finance planning, capital, and operating costs that support the development and maintenance of transportation services designed to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from jobs and activities related to their employment. These activities also include transportation projects that facilitate the provision of public transportation services from urbanized areas and rural areas to suburban employment locations including vanpool programs. Additional activities include: • Former New Freedom activities — improvements that exceed the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); • Public transportation projects to improve access to fixed -route transit; • Public transit projects expressly designed for seniors and people with disabilities, where transit is insufficient, inappropriate or unavailable; and • Alternatives to public transportation that assist seniors and people with disabilities. Eligibility for the above federal funds requires recipients to comply with all federal coordinated planning requirements in accordance with SAFETEA-LU and MAP-21 provisions. Under these programs, projects selected for funding must be derived from a locally -developed Coordinated Plan and must be developed through a process that includes representatives of the public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human service providers. In January 2015, the Commission approved 18 large urbanized area projects and four small urbanized projects under the federal FY 2012/13 and 2013/14 program years. A total of $2.6 million was approved for large urban areas and $287,000 was approved for small urban areas. Caltrans is due to release the award recommendations in June 2015, and it is anticipated that CTC will adopt the final list of funded projects in September 2015. The Commission is responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming. Planning includes the development of the countywide SRTPs for eight public transit operators consisting of the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; SCRRA's Metrolink commuter rail; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency; RTA; and SunLine. The Commission assists in coordinating the annual development, review, and approval of the operator SRTPs and allocates Measure A, LTF, STA, and FTA Sections 5307, 5311 transit funding resources to public transit programs including new federal funds, 5337 (State of Good Repair grant program), and 5339 (bus and bus facilities). The Sections 5337 and 5339 funds will be administered directly by SCAG with the sub -allocation to individual agencies determined by the Commission through the SRTP process. The Commission is responsible for the disbursement of Measure A, LTF, and STA funds, while federal transit funds are administered by the FTA. Due to California pension reform, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has not approved the FTA Section 5307 fund disbursements for FY 2014/15 and FY 2015/16. This has resulted in funding gaps for both RTA and SunLine. Staff is working in coordination with these transit operators to monitor the situation, and, if no resolution is found, a service reduction plan will be presented to the Commission in January 2016. While the Commission has reserves comprised of LTF and STA funds, staff will present to the Commission a plan for prudent backfilling of current obligations in conjunction with the aforementioned service reduction plan, if resolution of pension reform with the DOL is not accomplished. In partnership with the County's transit operators, the Commission coordinates the allocation of available Proposition 1B transit (capital and security) funding and ensures that proposed projects meet the mobility needs of the County. Proposition 1B funds are annually appropriated by the legislature and used for transit related capital purchases, infrastructure/facility improvements, and security enhancements. The Riverside County operators annually apply for Proposition 1B funds; however, due to the state's ongoing financial condition, the release of funds is contingent upon available proceeds from future bond sales. The Commission has public transit operator oversight and fiduciary responsibilities to ensure that annual fiscal audits and a state triennial performance audit are conducted in accordance with TDA regulations. The Commission is also charged with annually reviewing public transit operator activities and recommending potential productivity improvements to lower operating costs. To ensure that specialized transit allocations are expended and required service goals are met in accordance with funding agreements, the Commission engages an audit firm to perform certain agreed -upon procedures for the Measure A specialized transit funding recipients, some of which also received Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom funds. Key Assumptions • LTF, STA, and Measure A disbursements are based on projected budgetary allocations but may be adjusted after the Commission approves actual allocations in July 2015. • Fluctuating LTF and Measure A sales tax revenues will continue to require efforts to streamline operating expenses by all operators while maintaining efficiency and quality of service. • Transit Vision, adopted by the Commission in June 2008, established a 25% allocation of 2009 Measure A Western County specialized transit funds to the RTA as the CTSA for Western County. Accomplishments • Oversaw the successful second -year implementation of the ongoing specialized transit services resulting from the 2013 Universal Call for Projects funding allocation process. • Received approval notification of 22 capital projects awarded to ten successful Riverside County recipients of funding under the federal FY 2012/13 and FY 2013/14 FTA Section 5310 program. Projects were derived from a locally -developed Coordinated Plan. • Incorporated FY 2010/11 Proposition 16 Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account funds with transit capital funding sources following Caltrans' release of program funding covering a three-year period need for FY 2010/11— 2012/13. • Approved allocation of FY 2014/15 Proposition 1B California Transit Security Grant Program —California Transit Assistance funds for eligible transit safety and security projects identified by transit operators following release of program funding and guidelines by the California Emergency Management Agency. • Issued the 2015 Measure A Call for Projects and awarded funding allocations for Western County specialized transit services for FY 2015/16 through FY 2017/18. Major Initiatives The Commission has long demonstrated a strong commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its 1989 Measure A specialized transit program, the Commission provided millions of dollars to public and nonprofit transit operators for the provision of special transit services to improve the mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities. Along with support of traditional dial -a -ride services, the Commission supports innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders having very special transit needs. The riders, many frail and elderly, have come to depend on these services that provide a higher level of assistance than can be provided by the public transit providers and/or operate in areas not served by public transit. As a result of the 2009 Measure A, these specialized transit programs will continue through 2039. In June 2015, 17 programs in Western County and five programs in the Coachella Valley will complete their second year of specialized transit services under the 2013 Universal Call for Projects, including the non -emergency medical transportation component. Eleven of these projects are fully funded with Measure A funds, while the other eleven projects are funded by a mix of Measure A, JARC, and New Freedom (under SAFETEA-LU) funds. Successful awardees under the 2015 Measure A Call for Projects for the Western County will commence operation on July 1, 2015. As identified in the Coordinated Plan, the specialized transit projects approved for funding will require implementation and yearlong performance monitoring during FY 2015/16. Department Goals Provide timely information to the public regarding Commission -implemented projects and support public relations activities of Measure A funded programs by grant recipients. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: • Complete contract agreement execution process and start implementation of projects under the 2015 Measure A three-year Call for Projects. " Produce and distribute public information materials as needed including press releases, flyers, brochures, marketing materials, and newspaper ads. In addition, staff will also leverage the 1E511 traveler information system in order to more fully market the availability of specialized transit programs. Allocate Measure A Specialized Transit and federal funds to support services that will maintain and/or enhance mobility by alleviating transportation barriers for seniors, persons with disabilities, and the truly needy. (Policy Goals: Mobility, lntermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Monitor performance of specialized transit grant recipients through analysis of their monthly performance reports. " Support the consolidated FTA Section 5310 and 5307 (under MAP-21) grant processes to improve mobility for seniors, persons with disabilities and individuals of limited means by working with Caltrans, public operators, and social service agencies to ensure a competitive process statewide for the allocation of federal transportation dollars for social service programs. " Provide technical assistance and program support to agencies offering specialized transit programs to ensure the maximum benefit of funding for improved mobility for seniors, persons with disabilities, and individuals of limited means. " Seek Commission approval on funding allocations for the Measure A Call for Projects every three years. Coordinate the operation of all public transportation services within the County with a goal toward promoting program efficiency and harmony between transit operators as outlined in state law. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, lntermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Review transit planning, resource allocation, and service implementation policy requirements including appropriate coordination of commuter rail, intercounty and intercity bus, local bus and paratransit, and social service transportation services to ensure convenient service for passengers. " Implement recommendations resulting from the TDA-mandated triennial performance audits of the Commission and the seven Riverside County transit operators. " Assure the ongoing effectiveness of the SRTP process and work with the County's eight transit operators to assure productivity and efficiency as well as compliance with the productivity improvement program. " Coordinate regional transit connections among commuter rail, buses, and paratransit services to ensure convenient service for passengers. " Monitor transit operators' quarterly capital grants reports. " Monitor transit operators' performance through analysis of their quarterly performance reports using the TransTrack computer -based tracking program. " A major initiative will be working with the eight transit operator partners in providing connecting bus services to the Perris Valley Line stations. Continue to provide staff resources to assist and support the coordination of transit services within the County and throughout the State. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, lntermodalism & Accessibility, Communications) Objectives: " Participate and influence intercounty discussions between Riverside, Orange, San Diego, and San Bernardino counties regarding the enhancement of intermodal options. This includes additional transit services (rail and express bus) and rideshare services. " Regularly participate in meetings that focus on the coordination of transit services, such as the California Association for Coordinated Transportation, SunLine's Access Committee, RTA's ADA Committee, the Riverside County Foundation on Aging Board of Directors, the Older Californian Traffic Safety Task Force, Riverside Regional Coalition, and the Commission's Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service Transportation Advisory Council. " Continue the development of a marketing and distribution network for communicating specialized transit mobility options to seniors, the disabled, and persons of limited means. Public and Specialized Transit Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected SRTPs submitted by operators and reviewed 8 8 9 9 SRTP amendments 2 2 2 2 Specialized Transit grants awarded 22 22 21 16 One-way trips provided by Measure A funded projects 152,700 135,110 135,000 140,000 One-way trips provided by JARC & New Freedom funded agencies 300,000 255,240 230,000 72,400 One-way trips reimbursed through the Western County Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project 90,000 88,090 92,000 93,000 Transit tickets provided through the Transportation Access Program 63,000 65,212 66,000 67,000 Clients served through Blindness Support Services 30 59 35 35 Unique persons served through Vetlink 211 Services 1,500 2,810 2,900 2,950 Commuter Assistance Mission Statement: "To encourage and promote transportation alternatives for commuters through employer partnerships, information services, technological innovation, and community outreach." Chart 39 — Commuter Assistance Transfers Out 4% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 9% Professional Costs 11% Support Costs 5% Commuter Assistance expenditures and transfers out total $3,846,800, which represents an 11% increase from last year's budget (Table 56) due to the transition to a new program administrator contract structure, IE Commuter system enhancements, and special incentive projects funded by grants. Salaries and benefits of $341,000 reflect a 26% increase due to a change in FTE allocations, a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs, and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $419,000 have increased 22% over the prior year due to programming services for IE Commuter enhancements. Support costs of $209,300 include mail and printing services, computer and vehicle maintenance, communications, and other office expenditures have decreased 39% due to anticipated cost savings under the new program administrator contract structure. Projects and operations expenditures of $2,718,000 consist of park and ride lease payments of $150,000, regional transportation consultant services totaling $2,053,000 to manage and implement the program, and merchant vouchers valued at $515,000. Reimbursements from SANBAG for rideshare services provided by the Commission are included in revenues to offset these expenditures. Transfers out consist of $159,500 to the General fund for costs related to maintenance of the park and ride facility at the Downtown Perris station. Table 56 - Commuter Assistance Uses Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 286,200 $ 270,900 $ 319,300 Professional Costs Legal Services 30,200 20,000 25,600 Professional Services- General 571,200 323,000 378,200 Total Professional Costs 601,400 343,000 403,800 Support Costs 220,400 344,300 385,900 Projects and Operations Program Operations 2,028,400 2,332,700 2,391,900 Construction (300) - - Total Projects and Operations 2,028,100 2,332,700 2,391,900 Capital Outlay - 5,000 5,000 Transfers Out 100,800 159,500 159,500 TOTAL Commuter Assistance $ 3,236,900 $ 3,455,400 $ 3,665,400 $ 341,000 25,000 394,000 419,000 209,300 2,718,000 2,718,000 159,500 5 3.846.800 $ 70,100 26% 5,000 25% 71,000 22% 76,000 22% (135,000) -39% 385,300 17% N/A 385,300 17% (5,000) -100% 0% 391,400 11% Commuter Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Administrative Assistant 0.08 0.10 Chief Financial Officer 0.00 0.01 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.56 0.50 Deputy Executive Director 0.02 0.02 Management Analyst 0.56 0.50 Multimodal Services Director 0.47 0.43 Procurement Analyst 0.02 0.03 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 FTE 1.71 1.59 Department Budget Overview Department Description 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.03 0.55 0.55 0.02 0.03 0.10 1.87 While much of the Commission's work is focused on increasing transportation infrastructure and capacity, there is significant value in ensuring that the transportation systems are used efficiently. To help foster more efficient use of these systems, the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program seeks to encourage Riverside County constituents and commuters to make a mode -shift decision away from single occupancy vehicle commuting and into alternative modes of transportation such as a carpool, vanpool, buspool, public bus, Metrolink, walking, bicycling, or telecommuting. The Commuter Assistance Program seeks to efficiently influence driver behavior by fostering a mode -shifting decision at both the employer and commuter levels via the following methods: • The provision of employer services to foster the implementation of employer -based mode -shift and rideshare programs; • The use of incentives both for beginning and then maintaining a mode-shift/rideshare arrangement; • Public information services including the dissemination of personalized commute options and traveler information to educate commuters of all travel options available and to foster congestion avoidance behavior when traveling; and • Leverage technology to deliver easy to use online resources and tools to more efficiently serve employer partners, their employees, and all other commuters. The Commission's Commuter Assistance Program was implemented as a specific requirement under Measure A to address congestion mitigation. While ridesharing has a beneficial impact on air quality, first and foremost, it is a strategy to improve mobility through increased use of alternative travel modes. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue to contract with a consulting firm to administer an Inland Empire Commuter Assistance Program with regional reach. • Maintaining its long-term partnership with the Commission, SANBAG will contract with the Commission to manage and implement a "sister" Commuter Assistance Program for its residents and employers in San Bernardino County. Accomplishments • Launched IE Commuter, a new and robust web -based rideshare system designed to support all aspects of the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program, including but not limited to personalized transportation resources and information for commuters, tools for local employers to support ridesharing efforts at worksites, and automated program tracking and administrative functions supporting a more efficient operation. • Introduced the IE Commuter in parallel with the system launch as a "personalized service of IE511", successfully integrating the Commuter and Motorist Assistance suite of services under one brand. Therefore, instead of marketing two separate but overlapping programs, cost savings will be realized in marketing under a single unifying brand. • Continued to operate the report card program for both program participants and employer partners which translates individual or worksite rideshare participation into money saved, congestion reduced, and emissions reduced. This outreach is intended to recognize rideshare efforts and to motivate participants to continue ridesharing and/or grow employer program participation. • Continued use of the Program Measurement Tool to evaluate program performance. • Continued leases for park and ride facilities with the following locations: Canyon Community Church of the Nazarene (Corona), Living Truth Christian Fellowship (Corona), Corona Friends Church (Corona), Elsinore Naval Military School (Lake Elsinore), Lake Elsinore Outlets (Lake Elsinore), Mount San Jacinto College (San Jacinto), Hope Lutheran Church (Temecula), Orchard Christian Fellowship (Temecula), and the United Methodist Church (Temecula). • Developed new leased park and ride facilities: Tom's Farms (Corona), Shepherd of Life (Lake Elsinore), First Church of Christ Scientist (Menifee), United Church of Christ (Menifee), and Promise Lutheran Church (Murrieta). • Continued partnering with the Rail Department to provide park and ride spaces at the Perris Transit Center, La Sierra station, and a permitted section of park and ride spaces at the North Main Corona station. Major Initiatives A cornerstone of the Commuter Assistance Program is its continued partnership among commuters, employers, and government. The partnership, based on voluntary efforts, makes a collective difference in increasing the efficiency of the County's transportation system —local roads, freeways, commuter rail, and public bus. The combined effort results in less congestion, decreased vehicle miles traveled, and improved air quality. The major initiatives to continue these partnerships and efforts in FY 2015/16 are described below. Grow Employer Partnerships: Given that the highest percentage of rideshare arrangements is formed at work sites, voluntary employer participation is critical to address congestion and air quality goals; employers are the conduit to directly influence their employees' personal transportation choices. The ongoing success of the core Western County rideshare program is a testament to the significance of employer partnerships in the program's success. However, the prior economic downturn created a corporate culture of doing more with less. Many Employer Transportation Coordinators (ETCs) feel spread too thin to commit to offering a rideshare program. Delivery of value-added services and tools to make the ETC's job easier will be a critical motivation to continue the partnerships and develop new ones. Support Multimodal Travel: In addition to ridematching, information services, and incentives to facilitate ridesharing, the Commuter Assistance Program also provides park and ride facilities to support ridesharing efforts. The last Caltrans park and ride facility in Riverside County was built in 1999. The Commission leases park and ride spaces from property owners to supplement the network of park and ride spaces in Riverside County. A continued focus for FY 2015/16 will be to increase the number of spaces leased and coordinate with ridesharers and transit and rail partners to identify areas where the lease program can help support car/vanpool/buspool arrangements as well as facilitate transit connections. Reduce Program Administration Costs: Despite increases in Measure A revenue, the allocation for the Commuter Assistance Program is a fixed amount for the life of the measure. Staff is managing to that amount and a major initiative for the program is to reduce operational costs by restructuring and refocusing program administrative contracts while maintaining existing coverage and service levels. Historically, the program has been supported by a program administrator consultant and graphic design firm. A more cost effective and deliverable based program administrator contract will be implemented that consolidates these functions with a focus on program performance. Additionally, the Commuter Exchange Mobile Education Vehicle program will be eliminated. The vehicle will be surplused and the funds returned to the program reserves. This move is intended to focus the Commission's efforts on core program objectives that can reliably demonstrate trip reduction and congestion mitigation. Department Goals Operate a cost-effective Commuter Assistance Program within Riverside County that results in a demonstrable reduction in single occupant vehicle trips, thus assisting with congestion mitigation and improving air quality. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Environmental Stewardship) Objectives: • Award and transition to a more cost effective and performance based Commuter Assistance Program administrator contract. • Leverage Commuter Assistance Program resources to support outreach and transportation demand management objectives of major Commission projects, including but not limited to, the 91 Express Lanes and Perris Valley Line. • Continue to enhance the IE Commuter user experience with ongoing improvements in functionality and services offered. • Continue to offer short-term incentives for commuters to try a transportation mode other than driving alone. • Continue to provide a rewards program for long-term ridesharers to encourage their continued use of alternative modes of transportation. • Ensure the effectiveness of the Commuter Assistance Program through program analysis and recurring assessments of participation and retention of ridesharers. The Commission will continue to look for ways to pare program costs without impacting service delivery or participation. • Explore opportunities to further enhance the 511 mobile application by integrating incentive enrollment and/or tracking. • Increase participation and use of on-line service by employer partners to reduce administrative costs. • Optimize the number of park and ride spaces leased and address park and ride gaps in the system. Ensure the coordination of ridesharing programs throughout the Inland Empire and the southern California region. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Continue to administer a "sister" Commuter Assistance Program in San Bernardino County on a contract basis, thus expanding the reach and effectiveness of commuter programs throughout the Inland Empire area. • Continue to provide leadership with regard to the ongoing operation, maintenance, and enhancement of bi- county ridematching system with regional reach. • Investigate the modification of the regional vanpool agreement with the regional partners in order to provide for more service availability and a revision to the current cost sharing formula. Strategically broaden the reach of the program to encourage the use of alternative transportation modes amongst all travelers and continue to grow the core target base of employers and their employees. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Communications) Objectives: • Develop and support on-line resources and tools for employers to more effectively manage and market their organizations' rideshare programs. • Continue the dissemination of the report card program for both program participants and employer partners that translate individual or worksite rideshare participation into money saved, congestion reduced, and emissions reduced. • Publicize the participation of local employers in the Commuter Assistance Program through various media options. Commuter Assistance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Number of one-way single occupant vehicle trips reduced as a result of Rideshare Incentives 83,900 72,700 74,900 77,100 Number of Rideshare Plus Rewards Members 7,000 5,800 6,000 6,200 Number of incoming 1-866-RIDESHARE telephone calls 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Number of services provided by Inland Empire Commuter Services to support employer trip reduction efforts at worksites: • Employer's requesting survey services 165 140 145 150 • RideGuides produced 15,300 15,100 15,500 16,000 Number of events participated in by the Commuter Exchange in total and as identified individually below: • Public events 5 13 5 5 • Employer work sites 5 3 5 5 • Elementary schools 40 38 40 40 Motorist Assistance Mission Statement: "To improve safety, reduce congestion, and enhance access to traveler information for motorists through the provision of a comprehensive motorist aid system." Chart 40 - Motorist Assistance Salaries and Benefits 3% Professional Costs 11% . Expenditures Motorist Assistance expenditures and uses are budgeted at $6,476,900FY 2015/16, or an increase of 16% compared to the prior year budget (Table 57) due to call box upgrades and increased FSP service tied to construction. Salaries and benefits reflect a net decrease of 16% due to a decrease in FTE allocations and increases related to a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $739,900 increased 3%, and support costs of $930,100 increased $467,200, or 101%, due to implementation of call box hardware upgrades to maintain compatibility with evolving cellular technology and optimization of the call box network. Reimbursement from SANBAG for half of all 1E511 related expenditures is included in revenues. Budgeted expenditures for program operations include $3,652,500 in towing contract costs for the FSP program. Projects and operations costs have increased 11% due to increased FSP service supporting construction activity and anticipated increases in tow operator expenditures. Transfers out represent SAFE matching funds of $571,200 for FSP services and a $414,500 allocation for administrative costs. Table 57 - Motorist Assistance Uses Detail FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits $ 114,600 $ 201,200 $ 170,500 $ 168,700 $ (32,500) -16% Professional Costs Legal Services 15,800 36,000 42,000 31,000 (5,000) -14% Professional Services- General 509,800 685,400 685,400 708,900 23,500 3% Total Professional Costs 525,600 721,400 727,400 739,900 18,500 3% Support Costs 299,200 462,900 435,100 930,100 467,200 101% Projects and Operations Program Operations 2,559,000 3,296,600 3,103,400 3,652,500 355,900 11% Total Projects and Operations 2,559,000 3,296,600 3,103,400 3,652,500 355,900 11% Transfers Out 1,254,900 901,700 901,700 985,700 84,000 9% TOTAL Motorist Assistance $ 4,753,300 $ 5,583,800 $ 5,338,100 $ 6,476,900 $ 893,100 16% Motorist Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Chief Financial Officer 0.00 0.02 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.43 0.40 Deputy Executive Director 0.00 0.05 Management Analyst 0.36 0.40 Multimodal Services Director 0.05 0.09 Procurement Analyst 0.07 0.15 Procurement Manager 0.01 0.08 FTE 0.92 1.19 Department Budget Overview Department Description 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.05 0.08 0.10 1.03 As a SAFE, the Commission is responsible for providing a motorist aid system for Riverside County. This system is comprised of three components: 1) the 1E511 traveler information system, 2) FSP, and 3) call boxes. The 1E511 system is a telephone, website, and mobile app-based service that delivers real-time traffic information, including incidents and travel times, bus and rail trip planning, and rideshare information. The FSP clears debris in freeway lanes and assists stranded motorists on the most congested Riverside County freeways by towing, changing flat tires, and temporarily taping cooling system hoses at no charge to the motorists. FSP service is also provided in construction zones through separate funding agreements with Caltrans and Commission -funded construction projects to help mitigate congestion. The call box system allows motorists to call for assistance in the event of a mechanical breakdown, accident, or other emergency on the freeway. Key Assumptions • In partnership with SANBAG, the Commission will maintain and operate the 1E511 system in accordance with national 511 implementation standards. • The Commission will maintain and operate an 1E511 system to be funded 50% by the Commission and 50% by SANBAG. The Commission's share of operating costs will be funded with SAFE revenues. • The FSP will continue as long as state funding support is available. • Tow truck contractor costs for the nine existing FSP beats are based on Commission -approved contracts. • Annual maintenance costs are based on a flat -fee contract based on the number of call boxes. • Current percentage levels of vandalism, knockdowns, and miscellaneous repairs to call boxes will remain consistent with the past year. Accomplishments • Provided traveler information service through the 1E511 system to support over 33,000 IE511.org web visits and over 24,000 1E511 phone calls. • Incorporated additional freeway traffic data into the traveler information system to supplement Caltrans data and improve the availability and accuracy of traffic data throughout the Inland Empire. • Enhanced the 1E511 system with improved functionality and global positioning system capabilities for the 1E511 mobile application. • Deployed shift change to provide more optimal service coverage, resulting in an overall increase in assists. • Maintained one of the highest benefit -to -cost ratio statewide for FSP in the latest statewide FSP Management Information System Report. • Completed a FSP beat optimization study identifying opportunities for increased service to the public within existing service boundaries and without additional costs. • Deployed new tablet -based system for FSP data collection, more stable housing of assist information, easier access to reports, and future ability to integrate fleet management. " Continued the "cost recovery" program for call box knockdowns in an effort to collect reimbursements from motorists involved in accidents that damage Commission property. Major Initiatives The Commission, along with its partner, SANBAG, will continue to operate, maintain, and enhance the 1E511 system. This system includes a website interface and an interactive voice response (IVR) telephone system that serves Riverside and San Bernardino county residents and commuters. While several enhancements have been made to the system since its launch, new enhancements will focus on the development of serving more personalized traffic information services specific to a commuter's location, route, and time of travel. Major Motorist Assistance initiatives will also focus on system efficiencies and evaluating and/or implementing enhanced program services or coverage. The call box system program has served as a "safety -net" for stranded motorists in Riverside County since 1991. However, call box usage has declined over the years with the proliferation of mobile phone use. In response, call box reductions have been made, and additional reductions will be made based on call box removals identified in the call box reduction planning assessment. Another call box initiative will be to plan for a seamless service transition requiring call box hardware upgrades in anticipation of cellular technology migrations that will impact the call box network. Lastly, staff will focus on maintaining a high benefit -to -cost ratio and seek opportunities to maximize funding to not only improve the level of service but to potentially expand FSP coverage as well. Department Goals Provide efficient delivery of a comprehensive motorist aid system (IE511, FSP, Call Box) and an outstanding level of service to the traveling public. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Financial & Administration) Objectives: " Research new technologies to streamline FSP processes and develop new tools to automate the production of reports that track the performance of FSP tow operators. " Continue to evaluate opportunities to provide more efficient FSP coverage through changes in service days, service hours, or number of vehicles assigned to each beat; perform budget assessments to identify potential service expansion (i.e., holiday service, weekend service on select beats) opportunities that can be supported. " Review proposed construction projects with Commission, Caltrans and local cities and coordinate the use of temporary construction tow service to mitigate congestion. " Work in coordination with CHP and Caltrans to implement call box reductions identified in the planning assessment. Continue coordination with San Bernardino SAFE to monitor the operation of the call answering center contractor. Enhance access to real-time traveler information. (Policy Goals: System Efficiencies, Communications) Objectives: " Develop access to, or delivery of, more personalized traffic information services specific to a commuter's location, route, and time of travel. " Grow the number of users with more personalized offerings, services, and cost-effective marketing efforts. " Continue to refine and enhance 1E511 web content, applications, and outreach. " Continue to leverage existing resources, such as traffic data, provided by Caltrans District 8, existing IVR software, and Google Transit to minimize costs. " Continue coordination with Caltrans on expanding traffic detection and feeding that traffic data into the 1E511 system. " Utilize the opportunity at the new Caltrans District 8 Traffic Management Center to enhance coordination between CHP and Caltrans on traveler information. " Anticipate, plan and implement an effective hardware solution to anticipated cellular technology migrations that will affect the call box network. Motorist Assistance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Number of call boxes 563 570 500 450 Number of call box calls 5,200 4,685 4,200 3,800 Number of vehicle assists 44,585 44,076 46,500 48,800 Number of 1E511 phone calls 361,700 306,108 288,000 273,600 Number of 1E511 web visits 411,700 443,359 425,000 437,000 Capital Project Development and Delivery Mission Statement: "To keep the Commission's contract with the voters of Riverside County by accelerating the planning, programming, and implementation of projects and programs in the Measure A Transportation Improvement Plan, as enhanced by the Toll Program, to the extent that funds are available. To ensure that capital projects are environmentally acceptable, expertly designed, and implemented in a cost effective manner. To acquire and manage required right of way in the most economical, efficient, and timely manner." Chart 41— Capital Project Development and Delivery Debt Service 7% Capital Outlay 0% Expenditures Transfers Out 12% Salaries and Benefits Professional 1% Projects and Operations 79%+ Costs 1% '1414ft.torr The budgeted expenditures and transfers out total $834,863,900 to cover all of the Commission's major capital projects (Table 58). Personnel costs represent less than 1% of the budgeted uses. Salaries and benefits reflect an increase of 20% due to the addition of three new full-time FTEs to include a Toll Senior Management Analyst, Toll Technology Manager, and Toll Operations Manager in preparation for toll operations commencing in 2017; a 2% cost of living adjustment offset by employees' contribution for their share of normal pension costs; and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $8,760,100 are primarily related to general legal costs, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the toll program, and debt management services. Support costs of $587,600 consist primarily of services needed to maintain the Commission's real properties in a condition that complies with all local codes and regulations governing property maintenance. General project costs of $11,471,500 are related to program management provided by Bechtel Infrastructure (Bechtel), SCRRA, and permits for highway and rail capital projects. Significant projects included in engineering expenditures of $17,844,900 are the 1-15 Express Lanes; Mid County Parkway; SR-79 realignment; and various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects. Construction expenditures of $149,362,600, are primarily related to the 1-215 corridor improvements; 91 Project; Riverside quiet zones; various Western County Measure A and TUMF regional arterial projects; and Perris Valley Line and other rail improvement projects. Design -build costs of $284,681,200 pertain to the 91 Project and 1-15 Express Lanes project. Right of way expenditures of $105,312,400 on significant projects include the 91 Project; SR-91 HOV lanes from Adams Street to the 60/91/215 interchange; 91/71 interchange improvements; Mid County Parkway; SR-60 truck climbing lanes; various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects; grade separation projects; and Perris Valley Line and other rail projects. Funding will also be provided for MSHCP land mitigation acquisitions. Local turn back payments to jurisdictions and the County for local streets and roads repair, maintenance, and construction amount to $50,679,000, net of an allocation of $772,000 to the 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial special revenue fund related to the ineligibility of the city of Beaumont for its local streets and roads allocation. Disbursements to CVAG for the 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial program comprise substantially all of the regional arterial expenditures. Special studies of $80,000 are related to the toll operations and organizational planning. Operating and capital disbursements of $13,000,000 are related to RTA SR-91 express bus service capital funding and Metrolink station rehabilitation costs. Rail capital purchases for station rehabilitation projects represent 92% of the capital outlay expenditures. Interest payments on outstanding 2009 Bonds, 2010 Bonds, 2013 Sales Tax Bonds, and 2013 Toll Bonds are approximately $46,119,900. Principal payments of $7,800,000 are related to the 2009 Bonds. Significant transfers out consist of the following: • $46,477,000 in sales tax and toll revenue bond proceeds to fund the 91 Project; • $6,436,600 from the TUMF CETAP reserves for two city of Temecula regional arterial projects along 1-15; • $18,451,800 from 2009 Measure A Western County highway funds to the Debt Service fund; • $780,300 from TUMF for administrative allocations to the General fund; • $772,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County local streets and roads to the 2009 Measure A Western County regional arterial program for the city of Beaumont's local streets and roads allocation; and • $11,000,000 from 1989 Measure A Western County highway fund reserves and $16,776,600 from the 2009 Measure A Western County new corridor fund reserves to the 2009 Measure A Western County highway fund for an equity contribution to the 91 Project per the plan of finance. Table 58 — Capital Project Development and Delivery Uses Detail FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 FY 14/15 Revised Budget Projected FY 15/16 Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs Legal Services Audit Services Financial Advisory Professional Services- General Total Professional Costs Support Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction Design Build Right of Way and Land Local Streets and Roads Regional Arterials Special Studies Operating and Capital Disbursements Total Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Transfers Out TOTAL Capital Project Development and Delivery $ 2,736,300 $ 3,652,300 $ 3,782,200 5,232,900 3,100 590,800 1,643,900 5,806,900 60,500 345,000 2,265,700 4,166,700 36,500 106,000 1,430,100 7,470,700 290,400 9,248,200 12,725,800 90,669,000 157, 564, 700 91,297,400 46, 677,100 13,902,700 35, 500 2, 600 422,123,000 33,000 117,551,100 463,179,100 $ 1,013,383,600 8,478,100 1,052,400 13,969,300 17, 709, 000 240,435,200 255,303,500 186, 945, 900 49, 882, 000 30,400,000 420,000 7,500,000 802, 564, 900 3,100, 000 54, 696, 200 502,979,200 $ 1,376,523,100 5,739,300 366,800 10,413,200 10,203,700 158,376,000 227,943,000 65,715,300 49,882,000 22,397,800 207,000 5,500,000 550,638,000 700,000 54,696,200 230,987,400 $ 846,909,900 $ 4,370,400 5,956,400 46,500 372,000 2,385,200 8,760,100 587,600 11,471,500 17,844,900 149, 362, 600 284, 681, 200 105,312,400 50, 679, 000 30, 600, 000 80,000 13,000,000 663,031,600 3,500,000 53,919,900 100, 694, 300 $ 834,863,900 $ 718,100 20% 149,500 3% (14,000) -23% 27,000 8% 119,500 5% 282,000 3% (464,800) -44% (2,497,800) -18% 135,900 1% (91,072,600) -38% 29,377,700 12% (81,633,500) -44% 797,000 2% 200,000 1% (340,000) -81% 5,500,000 73% (139,533,300) -17% 400,000 13% (776,300) -1% (402,284,900) -80%% $ (541,659,200) -39% Capital Project Development and Delivery Staffing Summary Position FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Administrative Assistant 0.51 0.53 Capital Projects Manager 2.74 4.75 Chief Financial Officer 0.35 0.30 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.00 0.05 Deputy Director of Finance 0.01 0.02 Deputy Executive Director 0.06 0.09 Executive Director 0.19 0.30 Facilities Administrator 0.00 0.20 Government Relations Manager 0.00 0.04 Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 Multimodal Services Director 0.00 0.10 Planning & Programming Director 0.11 0.23 Planning & Programming Manager 0.00 0.31 Procurement Analyst 0.56 0.46 Procurement Manager 0.74 0.68 Project Delivery Director 0.97 0.95 Project Development Director 0.97 0.00 Public Affairs Manager 0.93 0.85 Right of Way Manager 1.00 1.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 Senior Management Analyst 2.00 2.16 Toll Operations Manager 0.00 0.00 Toll Program Director 1.00 1.00 Toll Project Manager 2.00 2.00 Toll Senior Management Analyst 0.00 0.00 Toll Technology Manager 0.00 0.00 FTE 15.14 17.02 Department Budget Overview Department Description FY 15/16 0.35 5.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.33 0.00 0.02 1.01 0.00 0.10 0.18 0.56 0.54 0.97 0.00 0.70 1.00 0.07 2.01 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 19.15 The primary responsibility of Capital Projects is the development and delivery of major highway and rail capital projects where the Commission is identified as the lead agency. The delivery of a capital project can include tasks such as feasibility studies, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, final design, right of way acquisition, utility relocation, construction, and construction management. Funding is also provided through Capital Projects for local jurisdiction highway and regional arterial projects based on funding agreements with the Commission. Approximately 81.3% of the Commission's FY 2015/16 budgeted expenditures originates in this department managed by the Toll Program and Project Delivery Directors responsible for the capital program. Capital Projects accelerates delivery of the Measure A, toll, state, and federally funded highway, regional arterial, and rail capital improvement projects throughout the County. Highway improvements currently in progress include the addition of mixed flow, carpool, truck climbing, and tolled express lanes; widening and realignment projects; and interchange improvements as well as a new CETAP corridor. Regional arterial capital improvements include funding for Western County TUMF and Measure A regional arterial projects. Commuter rail capital improvements include the expansion of commuter rail service in Western County. This department also provides the necessary coordination between the Commission and Caltrans for the development of scope, cost, and project delivery schedules for Measure A projects that are funded by the STIP and Proposition 1B CMIA. The 2009 Measure A program includes funding to the incorporated cities and the County for local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction. The budgeted amount is set by formula established in the Measure A TIP. To be eligible to receive these Measure A funds, each city in the Western County and Coachella Valley areas and the County must participate in the TUMF program, which is administered by WRCOG in Western County and by CVAG in Coachella Valley. Additionally, for Western County jurisdictions, they must also participate in the MSHCP. Annually all cities and the County are required to submit a five-year CIP and meet a MOE requirement. Each jurisdiction's respective allocation is based on population (Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling unit (Coachella Valley) and the amount of sales tax generated. The city of La Quinta had not participated in the Coachella Valley TUMF Program prior to February 2013 when the city adopted the TUMF ordinance and entered into an agreement with CVAG to reimburse CVAG for the shortfall of prior TUMF. Accordingly, the city of La Quinta began to receive 50% of its allocation in late FY 2012/13 until the shortfall is repaid and CVAG the remaining 50%. The city of Beaumont was determined to be in noncompliance with the Western County TUMF program. As a result, Beaumont's Measure A allocation is transferred to the Commission's MARA program. Given the support required to oversee and participate in the project development work, costs for Commission staff and related support have been included in this department budget. The projects identified in the FY 2015/16 budget funded by Measure A, TUMF, state, or federal funds as well as future toll revenues require the continued support of the Bechtel program management team which includes program managers, project engineers, construction engineers, inspectors, contracts administration, and support staff. Right of Way Acquisition and Support Services The primary goal of the Right of Way Management Division is to deliver right of way in the most cost-effective manner and within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. Commission staff required to supervise and manage right of way services and related support for individual projects are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. The Commission authorized the development of a Right of Way Acquisition Program in 2006. To implement the Commission's directive, staff procured the services of on -call right of way consultant services in the fields of right of way engineering and surveying, environmental assessment, appraisal and appraisal review, acquisition and relocation, feasibility studies and cost estimates, property management, and utility relocation. These consultants are managed and supervised by the Right of Way Management Division. Property Management The Commission strives to manage its real property with the objective of maximizing existing and future public transportation benefits, safety, and income by means of professional property management policies and procedures. This includes issuing licenses and rights of entry for authorized third -party uses, as well as investigating and resolving issues regarding uses that are not authorized by the Commission. During FY 2014/15 a comprehensive analysis was performed on existing licenses and encroachments. The Perris Valley Line portion of the SJBL has been completed, resulting in an increase of licenses. Work will continue to identify and, if necessary, enter into new licenses on the SJBL remainder. On certain occasions, the Commission may also grant easements. General maintenance activities and security measures are also part of the property management scope of work on all Commission -owned properties. The demolition and clearance of structures and other improvements on acquired property, excluding commuter rail stations, is included in the property management function. Additionally, the Commission must manage real property acquired for a project until it is required for construction. Since 1990, the Commission has acquired property assets in the course of rail and highway project implementation. To date, the rail properties number over 225 parcels. The Commission acquired approximately 500 parcels for the SR-74 widening project (Segments 1 and 2), and most of these parcels, which were related to Segment 1, have been transferred to Caltrans. In addition approximately 129 properties have been acquired for the SR-91 HOV lanes, Mid County Parkway, SR-79 realignment, SR-74 curve widening, Perris Valley Line, 1-215 corridor improvements (central segment), and SR-60 HOV lanes/I-215 to Redlands Boulevard projects. Property acquisition for the 91 Project began in 2010 with all of the 197 required parcels acquired to date; a significant number of the parcels have been acquired through eminent domain and some of these are in active litigation. These parcels were acquired in fee and permanent easement and will be transferred primarily to Caltrans and the city of Corona upon completion of the projects. Upon project completion, all remaining portions of properties within every project are reassessed and deemed surplus when it has been determined that the continued retention of the property no longer supports the Commission's policy goals and objectives. In connection with the federal TIFIA loan for the 91 Project, the Commission is required to establish a $20,000,000 TIFIA debt service reserve by June 2019. The Commission anticipates that proceeds from the sales of excess properties related to the project will be sufficient to fund the reserve. Long -Term Strategic Planning Several years ago, the strategic plan for the 1989 Measure A highway program was updated and provided the guidance for completion of the 1989 Measure A highway projects. A significant effort was completed in December 2006 to develop an implementation plan strategy for the 2009 Measure A state highway program, with a focus on the first 10 years of the program through 2019. An objective -based assessment of the Western County portion of the 2009 Measure A TIP was completed along with the prioritization of the program of projects. Four highway corridors, I-215, 1-15, 1-10, and SR-91, were selected as the priority focus for the first 10 years of the 2009 Measure A program, and long-term development work was approved for large scale projects such as the development of the Mid County Parkway, realignment of SR-79, and the bi-county widening of 1-215 to San Bernardino County. Project development activities for these projects have been ongoing since an update and reprioritization was completed in January 2010. Since 2010, a scope reevaluation was completed on the 1-15 Express Lanes Project and the Commission adopted a new scope of work which entails tolled express lanes on the northern 14 miles of 1-15 in Riverside County. The 1-10 truck climbing lanes project was deferred several years and has been replaced with added safety improvements on SR-60. For the strategic projects, preliminary engineering and environmental clearance will be completed for the Mid County Parkway and SR-79 realignment; right of way acquisition for Mid County Parkway will be considered for extraordinary acquisitions on a pay-as-you-go basis. Project costs and anticipated funding for these projects have been updated annually, and a status update has been included in each of the annual Commission workshops since 2011. Updated capital project implementation strategic plans are expected in 2019 and 2029, as required by the 2009 Measure A. CVAG has developed a strategic plan for Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial projects based upon a transportation project prioritization study that is updated periodically. The Perris Valley Line is the most significant rail capital project, and it was included in the 1989 and 2009 Measure A programs. Other rail capital projects are developed in coordination with SCRRA as well as the implementation of the Perris Valley Line. Four new Western County transportation corridors were identified through CETAP and are eligible for 2009 Measure A Western County new corridor and TUMF CETAP funding. Given the size and anticipated cost of these new corridors, they are moving forward on varied schedules with the work on the internal corridors, the Mid County Parkway and 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment completed in 2013 and central segment scheduled to be completed summer 2015) to French Valley interchange, being the most advanced. Western County TUMF regional arterial projects were approved in 2004 based on a call for projects, which is discussed in the Planning and Programming Department in section 6.2 of this document. Additionally, the Commission will participate in the improvement of a wildlife corridor crossing under SR-91, B Canyon, in collaboration with Caltrans, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. National Forest, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Parks and Recreation. The actual construction of this enhancement will be done subsequent to the construction on the 91 Project as a separate project. These strategic planning activities play a significant part of the Commission's annual budget process, in particular the capital budget. Key Assumptions • The Commission will continue its emphasis on the closeout of the 1989 Measure A program. • The Western Riverside County Delivery Plan serves as the basis for defining the 2009 Measure A project selection and prioritization. • Western County TUMF regional arterial projects are based on the list approved by the Commission in 2004. • Agreements for the advancement of 2009 Measure A funds have been obtained from CVAG and cities participating in the debt programs. The annual principal and interest payments for these loans will be deducted by the Commission from each agency's respective disbursements based on the terms of the loan agreements. • Highway project costs are based on engineers' estimates and scope agreements with Caltrans. • Construction projects are competitively bid to minimize costs. • Design -build projects are competitively procured using a best value selection process to maximize value to the Commission. • All projects will be built to required standards. • All highway projects, with the exception of tolled express lane facilities, are transferred upon completion to Caltrans; operation of these facilities is the responsibility of Caltrans. Tolled express lane facilities, when completed, will be operated and maintained by the Commission for the term agreed to by Caltrans and the Commission. • The Commission will develop strategies to implement alternative financing structures including public toll roads. • MARA projects had been selected and programmed in previous years when revenues were at a level that could sustain reasonable cash flow to fund the construction projects selected for this program, and a call for projects that combined available MARA funds with federal revenues was completed and approved in FY 2013/14. • Development of the Mid County Parkway strategic project through preliminary engineering and environmental clearance will continue. • Design and right of way acquisition for the Mid County Parkway will commence by fall 2015. Accomplishments • Continued implementation of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Continued construction and right of way support for the SR-91 HOV lanes and SR-74 curve realignment projects. • Continued to advance the development of the 91 Project in numerous areas: • Completed final design for all the roadway and bridge work; • Completed approximately 35% of construction and maintained a planned 2017 opening of all traffic lanes; • Completed the preliminary design, toll operations center requirements, and back office software requirements for the Electronic Toll and Traffic Management system for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes; • Completed the first Financial Plan annual update which identified the need for an additional $95 million of funds primarily due to a projection of property acquisition settlement costs; • Reaffirmed the Commission's toll revenue bond ratings; and • Acquired or achieved possession rights for all planned property needed for the project. • Completed final design, commenced right of way acquisition, and secured utility relocation agreements for the 91/71 interchange improvement project. • Continued preliminary engineering and environmental studies work on the 1-15 Express Lanes Project with an anticipated environmental circulation during FY 2015/2016; completed procurements for project and construction management design -build services, an investment grade traffic and revenue study, and bond underwriter services. • Completed plant establishment phase for the 74/215 interchange project. • Completed the updated technical studies and engineering modifications to address the reduced project limits of the proposed Mid County Parkway project and recirculation of the environmental document for public review and comment; certified the final EIR and adopted the findings pursuant to CEQA, thereby approving the Mid County Parkway project with anticipated issuance of a Record of Decision by fall 2015. " Addressed comments on the draft environmental document, updated technical studies and engineering modifications for the SR-79 realignment project. " Completed construction of the SR-60/1-215 east junction, SR-74 curve widening, and 1-215 Bi-County HOV gap closure projects. " Continued construction for the Perris Valley Line project. " Commenced construction on the Riverside Downtown Station Operations Control Center. " Supported public outreach activities by providing graphics from the right of way project management database for Commission presentations to facilitate public understanding of project issues. " Continued to declare property no longer needed for transportation purposes as surplus and sold several surplus properties. Major Initiatives FY 2015/16 will mark the seventh year as the Commission closes out the 1989 Measure A programs and continues project activities related to the 2009 Measure A programs, of which the highway, rail, regional arterial, and local streets and roads programs represent the majority of the funding allocations. While most of the 1989 Measure A highway projects have been completed, the SR-91 HOV lanes from Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange and the Perris Valley Line rail project are nearing completion of construction. Various stages of project development work for projects included in the Western County Highway Delivery Plan will continue in FY 2015/16. Construction of the 1-215 corridor improvement project (central segment) widening from Scott Road to Nuevo Road is anticipated in summer 2015 to be followed by a three-year plant establishment period. Detailed descriptions of the capital projects, including local streets and roads funding, that are included in the FY 2015/16 budget follow the Performance/Workload Indicators. Department Goals Build upon and strengthen the partnership with Caltrans toward timely delivery of identified Measure A, CMIA, toll program, and STIP projects. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Environmental Stewardship, Economic Development) Objectives: " Develop agreements with Caltrans and FHWA, as may be required, to finalize project scoping and cost issues for the STIP, federal demonstration, toll, and Measure A funded highway projects in Riverside County. " Meet the project milestones identified in the CMIA agreements between Commission, Caltrans, and the CTC. To the extent permitted by law, pursue reasonable involvement of local DBE and SBE firms in contract work. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objective: " Maintain and monitor goal for a minimum DBE participation in all federally funded contracts. Provide effective communication of project progress to the Commission board members, city councils, the County Board of Supervisors, Caltrans, CTC, FTA and FHWA. (Policy Goal: Communications) Objectives: " Develop a strategy with Caltrans District 8 that would allow the Commission to advance specific projects identified in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan to take advantage of any unexpected state or federal funding which may become available through increased state or federal budget authorizations, federal stimulus, or potential loan programs to advance construction. " Conduct quarterly meetings with FTA and report on progress of Perris Valley Line project. Work with Caltrans and other agencies toward completion of preliminary engineering and environmental clearance of all projects. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objectives: • Work with Caltrans, the County, and the cities in Riverside County to complete preliminary design and environmental clearance for Measure A projects that could be eligible to receive additional or early funding from various sources that could become available if a project is sufficiently developed. • Prepare the final environmental document for the SR-79 realignment project. • Receive a Record of Decision on the modified Mid County Parkway project. • Complete the project approval and environmental document and begin design of the SR-60 truck climbing lane project. • Complete the project approval and environmental document for the 1-15 Express Lanes project. • Prepare and receive approval on the final environmental document for I-15/Railroad Canyon TUMF project. • Continue the project development and environmental document for 1-215 south connector to 1-15. Construct the highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Economic Development, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Complete closeout of the 74/1-15 to 7`h Street and 74/215 interchange projects. • Complete construction of the 1-215 corridor improvement project (central segment) between Scott Road and Nuevo Road and the SR-91 HOV lanes project. • Continue right of way, design -build, and construction of the 91 Project. In coordination with the Rail Program Manager, construct capital improvements at existing commuter rail stations as identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, System Efficiencies, Environmental Stewardship, Intermodalism & Accessibility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Complete construction of the Perris Valley Line. • Complete construction of the Riverside Downtown Station Operations Control Center. Acquire right of way for rail and highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Mobility, Financial & Administration) Objectives: • Acquire right of way for the following projects: 91 Project, Perris Valley Line, Mid County Parkway, 91/71 interchange improvements, 91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 interchange, and SR-60 truck climbing lanes. • Protect and maintain properties acquired for future projects. • Dispose of Commission -approved excess land in a timely manner. Identify alternative financing strategies in order to fully fund projects identified in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. (Policy Goal: Mobility) Objective: • Continue the assessment and evaluation of available strategies. Location of FY 2015/16 Major Capital Projects within Riverside County INSERT MAP HERE 1) SR-74 Right of way for the curve widening on SR-74 from Calvert Avenue to California Avenue. 2) 74/215 Plant establishment of the interchange. 3) SR-79 Realignment between Gilman Springs Road and Domenigoni Parkway including project study report, project report, and environmental document. 4) SR-91 (A) Engineering and construction of HOV lanes from Adams Street to the 60/91/215interchange. (B) Final design and right-of-way acquisition for the 91/71 interchange improvements. (C) Design -build toll and mixed flow lanes from the Orange County line to Pierce Street including tolled express lanes connectivity to 1-15 and improvements to the 15/91 interchange. 5) Mid County Parkway 6) Perris Valley Line 7) Local Streets and Roads 8) 1-215 9) 1-15 10) SR-60 Truck Climbing Lane Preliminary engineering, project report, and environmental documentation followed by design and right of way. Construction of the Metrolink extension (Riverside -Moreno Valley - Perris) along the SJBL. Allocation of Measure A revenues to each city and the County to improve, maintain, and repair high priority local streets and roads. Construction of the central segment from Scott Road to Nuevo Road and plant establishment. Preliminary engineering and environmental documents and design - build planning and procurement development for the addition of tolled express lanes from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. Preliminary engineering and environmental document as well as right of way acquisition for the truck climbing lane project. Capital Project Development & Delivery Performance/Workload Indicators FY 13/14 Estimated FY 13/14 Actual FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Projected Preliminary engineering (project reports and environmental documentation) contracts awarded 0 0 1 0 Plans, specifications, and estimate contracts awarded 0 1 1 1 Number of projects with active right of way acquisition 2 2 2 2 Construction awards 1 2 1 1 Highway and Rail project close-outs 1 1 4 1 License agreements managed 80 298 180 220 Appraisal and appraisal reviews completed 75 60 40 25 Capital Projects Summary The following is a summary of the capital projects included in the FY 2014/15 budget. Costs are generally categorized by preliminary engineering, final design, right of way, construction, and design -build phases in addition to other project -related costs such as salaries and benefits, Bechtel project management, and legal fees. Western County Highway and Regional Arterial Projects SR-74/1-15 to 7th Street (P003001) Complete right of way acquisition closeout for Segment II related to the realignment and widening of four -lane roadway between Wasson Canyon Road in the city of Lake Elsinore and 7th Street in the city of Perris. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 650,000 Right of way support services $ 107,400 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 74/215 Interchange (P003015) Complete project close-out and plant establishment work by summer 2015. Preliminary engineering began in 2006 and was completed in 2009. Final design was completed in 2009. Construction began in mid-2010 and was completed in 2013. The total project cost is estimated at $30 million. FY 2015/16 Cost $ 70,000 Construction and construction management $ 33,800 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds, TUMF zone contributions, ARRA funds, and a federal earmark. Operating Budget Impact N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-74 Curve Widening (P003009) Construction of the project began in May 2014. The total estimated project cost is $4.2 million. FY 2015/16 Cost $ 392,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 96,400 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using 1989 Measure A highway funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-79 Realignment (P003003 & P005127) Perform realignment environmental and preliminary engineering services from Gilman Springs Road to Domenigoni Parkway. The project is expected to be completed with the environmental phase in 2016. The total estimated project cost is $1.2 billion. Initiation of subsequent phases will be dependent upon the availability of funding. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,210,000 Preliminary engineering $ 270,000 Right of way support services $ 327,700 Other project -related costs None; costs have been funded using TUMF regional arterial, 2009 Measure A highway, federal earmarks, and SAFETEA-LU federal funds. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 91 Project (PO03028) Continue property acquisition and design -build activities for the tolled express and mixed flow lanes project from the Orange County line to Pierce Street, including tolled express lanes connectivity to 1-15 and improvements to the 15/91 interchange. Project development activities began in September 2007 and lanes are expected to be open to traffic in 2017. The 91 Project cost is estimated at $1.4 billion. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 12,775,800 Construction/support services $ 70,985,600 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 274,681,200 Design -build $ 10,848,000 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway and new corridor funds including sales tax revenue bonds, toll revenue bonds, a federal TIFIA loan, STIP and SLPP funds, and 1989 Measure A contribution. Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilities are the responsibility of the Commission, while all other state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Current estimates of annual operating and maintenance costs are $11,200,000. Such costs will be paid from the collection of toll revenues beginning in 2017. 91/71 Interchange Improvements Project (PO03021) Complete final design and continue right of way acquisition for interchange improvements to the 91/71 interchange. Final design began in March 2012. The total estimated project cost is $123 million. FY 2015/16 Cost $ 125,000 Final design $ 2,795,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 212,300 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs for final design and right of way acquisition are primarily funded using Congressionally -designated federal funding remaining from previous area projects. The balance of funding will come from 2009 Measure A highway funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-91 HOV Lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 Interchange (P003005) Complete construction and utility relocations. Preliminary engineering began in 2001. Construction of the project should be completed in fall 2015. The estimated total project cost is $273 million. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 35,000 Final design $ 832,900 Construction $ 2,369,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 286,200 Other project -related costs Final design costs will be funded using Letter of No Prejudice funds received and CMAQ with 1989 Measure A highway funds for local match. Right of way costs will be funded using STIP-RIP, Traffic Congestion Relief Program, CMAQ, and 1989 Measure A highway funds. CMAQ and CMIA funds generated by Proposition 1B will be used for construction activities. Caltrans is the lead agency. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-15 Express Lanes Project (PO03027) Continue preliminary engineering and environmental work to add one to two tolled express lanes in each direction from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. The project will use the design -build method of project delivery. Commence planning and procurement work for design -build services, toll system implementation, and toll operations. Project development activities began in April 2008, and lanes are expected to be open to traffic in 2020. The estimated total project cost is $450 million. FY 2015/16 Cost $ 2,900,000 Preliminary engineering $ 10,000 Right of way support services $ 10,000,000 Design -build $ 4,409,200 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Project development costs and a portion of construction will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. It is anticipated that federal CMAQ funds will be used, toll revenue bonds will be issued, and the Commission will secure a federal TIFIA loan to complete the project financing plan. Operating Budget Impact Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilities are the responsibility of the Commission, while all other federal and state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Preliminary estimates of annual operating and maintenance costs are $15 million. Such costs will be paid from the collection of toll revenues. SR-60 Truck Climbing Lanes Project (PO03029) Provide funding and support to begin right of way acquisition in 2015. Construction of the project is expected to be completed by 2020. The total project cost is estimated at $11 million FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,044,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 139,500 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded with 2009 Measure A highway funds and STIP. CMAQ funds will be used for preliminary engineering. Caltrans is the lead agency for preliminary engineering. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 60/215 East Junction HOV Lane Connectors (PO03017) Complete construction of the project in early 2015. Preliminary engineering began in 2006. Final design and right of way acquisition were completed in 2010. The total project cost is estimated at $42 million. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 15,000 Construction $ 10,000 Right of way support services $ 44,800 Other project -related costs STP and CMAQ, with STIP-RIP and STIP-IIP for local match funds, will be used for construction. Caltrans is the lead agency for construction. N/A; state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvements/Scott Road to Nuevo Road (PO03023) Complete construction and begin three-year plant establishment period. Project will add one mixed flow lane in each direction. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and was completed in 2011. Final design began in 2011 and was completed in December 2012; construction began in 2013. Construction of the project is expected to be completed in 2015. The total project cost is estimated at $120 million. FY 2015/16 Cost $ 12,150,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 225,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 672,800 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using CMIA, STIP-RIP, and 2009 Measure A highway funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Mid County Parkway (P002302 & P612302) Perform activities related to the environmental phase for a new corridor from 1-215 to SR-79, which is anticipated to be completed in FY 2015/16. Construction of this new facility will be completed over many years as funding becomes available and is estimated to cost $1.7-1.9 billion. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 12,000,000 Preliminary engineering/final design $ 18,200,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 992,300 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded with TUMF CETAP funds and 2009 Measure A new corridor funds. N/A; responsibility for highway operations has not been determined. Santa Ana River Trail (P007201) Provide support to the District for the Santa Ana River Trail project under a cooperative planning and development agreement. The District is the lead agency for environmental compliance for NEPA and CEQA, and the Commission will be responsible for project oversight and approval, final design, and construction. The District is responsible for 100% of costs. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 90,000 Preliminary engineering/final design $ 250,000 Construction/construction support services $ 100,000 Right of way acquisition $ 90,400 Other project -related costs None; costs will be funded by the District. N/A; operations are the responsibility of the District. Riverside Quiet Zones (P003037) Provide funding and support to the city of Riverside for the implementation of quiet zones to mitigate train horn noise impacts to Riverside neighborhoods and to optimize safety at 11 at -grade highway rail crossings and one pedestrian only at -grade crossing along the BNSF San Bernardino Subdivision. The project cost is $7.4 million and will be completed in December 2014. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 5,773,200 Construction Costs will be funded with STP and Measure A funds. N/A; the city of Riverside is the lead agency. Various Western County Highway Projects (P623999, 662402, 223999, P312402, & P314008) Provide funding and support for the engineering, construction, and right of way activities related to various Western County highway and grade separation projects. FY 2015/16 Cost $ 1,702,200 Right of way support services $ 329,400 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway or economic development funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Various Western County Measure A and TUMF Regional Arterial Projects (P005206, P005205, P005204, P005203, P005202, P005201, P005102, P005103, P005104, P005105, P005106, P005107, P005108, P005116, P005118, P005119, P005120, P005128, P005132, P725000, & P665102) Provide Western County Measure A and TUMF funding and support for the engineering, right of way, and construction activities related to various Western County Measure A and TUMF regional arterial projects approved by the Commission. Total project costs approved for MARA and TUMF regional arterial projects approximate $143 million. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,197,400 $ 57,265,300 $ 2,016,600 $ 141,600 Engineering and final design Construction Right of way acquisition Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using TUMF regional arterial and 2009 Measure A regional arterial funds with various local jurisdictions as lead agency for their respective projects. N/A; regional arterial operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdictions. MSHCP Land Acquisition in Western County (P002800) Provide funding and support for the acquisition of land as mitigation for the cumulative and indirect impacts associated with construction of future highway projects as required by 2009 Measure A. The annual commitment through December 2019 is $3 million. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 3,000,000 Land acquisition Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; land mitigation operations are the responsibility of RCA. Rail Projects Perris Valley Line and Other Rail Projects (PO03800, PO03823, PO03824, PO03827, PO03829, PO03830, P003831, PO03832, PO03834, and PO03835) Continue construction of extension of commuter rail services to Perris. Project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from FTA to move into project development. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the SJBL branch line at Highgrove. Expected completion date of the Perris Valley Line is December 2015 for a total project cost of $248.3 million. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 155,000 Engineering support services $ 52,487,400 Construction/construction management/support services $ 1,333,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 7,114,100 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using FTA, CMAQ, STP, and 1989 Measure A rail funds as well as proceeds from sales of surplus properties. Subsequent year costs will also include STIP funding. Rail station operations related to this project, which will be the responsibility of the Commission upon completion of the project, will be funded with LTF and property management fees. Rail service and capital operations will be the responsibility of Metrolink and will be funded by the Commission with LTF and STA based on an allocation determined by Metrolink. Annual station operations approximate $300,000 per station, or $1,200,000 annually in the aggregate for four new stations. La Sierra Station Improvements (P653826) Improve the multimodal benefits of the station to serve the express bus network being implemented upon completion of the 91 Project and to provide a dedicated park and ride facility for carpools and vanpools along SR- 91. Facility improvements include the addition of 500 parking spaces, five new bus bays, a new street entrance, and dedicated bus stops and passenger loading area. Construction is estimated at $3 million, and the facility expansion is expected to be completed in FY 2015/16. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 105,000 Preliminary engineering/final design $ 2,690,000 Construction/construction management $ 10,000 Right of way support services $ 37,100 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded with FTA Section 5309 funds. Operations of all commuter rail stations are the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using LTF. Riverside Downtown/Pedley Station Improvements (PO04023) Provide funding and support for improvements at the Riverside Downtown and Pedley stations to include ticket vending machine relocation, passenger waiting area shelters, ADA improvements, and landscaping. Project will commence in September 2015 and is expected to be completed by July 2016. Total project cost is $1. 5 million. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 27,500 Final design $ 1,503,000 Construction/construction management $ 15,900 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using federal STP and 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations will be the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using LTF. Station Rehabilitation and Security (P004011 & P004012) Provide funding and support for station rehabilitation and security at the Riverside Downtown, La Sierra, North Main Corona, West Corona, and Pedley stations. Improvements include lighting, parking lot repavement and restriping, security camera replacements, and deck coating. Construction is expected to begin in July 2015. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 3,550,000 Construction/construction management $ 3,500,000 Property improvements Costs will be funded using FTA, Proposition 1B transit security funds, and 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operations will be the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using LTF. Various Western County Rail Projects (P332402, P214199, P454199 & P654199) Provide Measure A funding and support for right of way activities related to various rail projects. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 200,000 Right of way support services $ 2,654,700 Other project -related costs 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Costs will be funded using 2009 Measure A rail funds. Local Streets and Roads Western County Area Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Western County. FY 2015/16 Cost $ 535,000 Banning Beaumont 152,000 Calimesa 172,000 Canyon Lake 3,776,000 Corona 1,141,000 Eastvale 1,634,000 Hemet 1,830,000 Jurupa Valley 1,159,000 Lake Elsinore 1,476,000 Menifee 3,611,000 Moreno Valley 2,114,000 Murrieta 607,000 Norco 1,416,000 Perris 6,797,000 Riverside 782,000 San Jacinto 2,747,000 Temecula 565,000 Wildomar 5,238,000 Riverside County 772,000 Commission (MARA) 36,524,000 Total Western County (772,000) Less: Beaumont Allocation to (MARA) $ 35,752,000 Total Western County, net Measure A Budget Impact All costs will be distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streets and roads funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Coachella Valley Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Coachella Valley. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,427,000 Cathedral City 627,000 Coachella 498,000 Desert Hot Springs 253,000 Indian Wells 1,796,000 Indio 1,499,000 La Quinta 2,686,000 Palm Desert 2,035,000 Palm Springs 871,000 Rancho Mirage 2,071,000 Riverside County $ 13,763,000 Total Coachella Valley All costs will be distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Palo Verde Valley Area Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Palo Verde Valley. FY 2015/16 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 928,000 Blythe 236,000 Riverside County $ 1,164,000 Total Palo Verde Valley All costs will be distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streets and roads funds. N/A; local streets and roads operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Community Profile Riverside County is the fourth largest county in California, stretching westward nearly 200 miles from the Colorado River and comprising more than 7200 square miles that include 28 incorporated cities. Riverside County can trace its beginning back to 1893 when voters approved the formation of a new county. The area was carved from parts of San Bernardino and San Diego counties. In its 123 years of existence, the County's economy has diversified and prospered. Originally, Riverside County was a very agricultural area, known for a wide variety of crops grown on its fertile soils. The County remains a strong agricultural area, but it is increasingly becoming a leader in manufacturing, transportation, construction, and tourism. Demographics The success of the area has brought dramatic population growth to Riverside County (Chart 42). Since the 1980's, the County has been one of the fastest growing counties in the State. Chart 42 — Population — Last Ten Years 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 'L°0\ Source: California Department of Finance ti°o$ ce°' ti°11 ti°1� The available and affordable housing in Riverside County has attracted many people to the County (Chart 43); however, housing is gradually recovering from a slowdown due to the effect of the subprime mortgages, ensuing credit crisis, and recession. Chart 43 — Home Price Advantage $800, 000 $700, 000 $600,000 $500, 000 $400,000 $300, 000 $200,000 $100,000 $- Home Value Advantage Riverside County and Southern California Markets (February, 2015) ❑ Median Home Values ❑ Riverside County Advantage $323,200 419,300 $96,100 $499,000 $175 800 $568,800 $245,60 $680,300 $357,100 Riverside Los Angeles San Diego Ventura Orange Source: California Association of Realtors County During the growth period, jobs also increased as many firms relocated to the area and moved away from older communities; however, the recent economic slowdown had caused the County's unemployment rate to rise from its near all-time lows (Chart 44). The unemployment rate has been decreasing. Chart 44 — Unemployment Rate (%) — Last Ten Years 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0 % 6.0% 4.0 % 2.0% 0.0 % ti0"' ti��b 1°6\ Source: California Employment Development Department ti`"'") The overall economic outlook for Riverside County is expected to continue to improve in 2016 based on various economic forecasts. The area is preparing for its future as well in supporting better education. The County is home to a number of colleges and universities including University of California, Riverside. Statistical Information Retail Sales As a result of demographic changes and growth, retail sales (Chart 45 and Table 59) in the County have shown continued improvements following the recent recession. Chart 45 — Retail Sales (%) - $30 Billion — 2013 Data Other Retail Sales J 5.93% Source: State Board of Equalization Apparel Stores 5.89% General Merchandise 10.97% Total all other services & outlets 29.94% Automotive 24.69% Food Stores 4.73% Household & Electronics 3.31% Building Materials 5.11% Table 59 -Riverside County Taxable Sales by Business Type (in 000's) - Last Five Years Apparel Stores General Merchandise Food Stores Eating & Drinking Household & Electronics Building Materials Automotive Other Retail Sales Total all other services & outlets 2013 1,771,603 $ 3,298,920 1,421,590 2,836,388 996,484 1,535,178 7,421,523 1,781,754 9,002,027 2012 1,672,482 3,174,022 1,356,148 2,668,324 930,068 1,364,513 7,009,138 1,841,973 8,079,341 2011 $ 1,505,821 3,051,709 1,304,731 2,473,339 914,888 1,303,073 6,311,272 1,711,453 7,065,212 2010 $ 1,391,174 2,947,905 1,267,758 2,317,486 883,109 1,232,145 5,306,408 1,480,601 6,326,196 2009 $ 1,293,271 2,855,733 1,251,220 2,266,853 858,098 1,237,518 4,749,994 1,442,875 6,272,315 30,065,467 $ 28,096,009 $ 25,641,498 $ 23,152,782 $ 22,227,877 The 2013 taxable sales generation by jurisdiction in the County, including ranking compared to 2004, is presented in Table 60. Table 60 -Taxable Sales Generation by Jurisdiction in Riverside County for 20131 City of Riverside City of Corona City of Temecula City of Palm Desert City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Palm Springs City of Hemet City of Indio City ofJurupa Valley City of Perris City of La Quinta City of Cathedral City City of Lake Elsinore City of Eastvale City of Menifee City of Norco City of Rancho Mirage City of Beaumont City of Coachella City of San Jacinto City of Banning City of Blythe City of Desert Hot Springs City of Wildomar City of Indian Wells City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake Incorporated Unincorporated county area Countywide California Source: California State Board of Equalization 1 Year represents most recent data available Taxable Sales (in 000's) $ 4,612,948 3,111,998 2,610,286 1,530,512 1,349,129 1,147,563 985,824 911,841 806,604 806,187 738,592 731,325 714,179 688,483 538,279 474,050 468,781 399,919 352,449 309,858 208,934 175,386 168,254 142,477 122,793 91,160 61,980 16,452 % of Total 15.3% 10.4% 8.7% 5.1% 4.5 % 3.8% 3.3% 3.0% 2.7% 2.7% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3 % 1.8% 1.6% 1.6% 1.3 % 1.2% 1.0% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5 % 0.4% 0.3 % 0.2% 0.1% 2013 Rank 2004 Rank 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 9 8 10 9 7 10 11 11 N/A 12 16 13 12 14 8 15 14 16 N/A 17 N/A 18 13 19 15 20 20 21 17 22 21 23 18 24 19 25 22 26 N/A 27 23 28 24 29 25 24,276,243 5,789,224 81.0% 19.0% 1 1 30,065,467 100.0% $ 586,839,618 Measure A Sales Taxes Measure A is a one-half of one cent transaction and use tax for transportation improvements in Riverside County. The County had an 8.75% sales tax rate including the Measure A rate through June 2011, 7.75% from July 2011 through December 2012, and 8.00% thereafter (Table 61). Table 61- Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates - Last Five Years Fiscal Year Measure A Direct Rate County of Riverside 2015 0.50% 8.00% 2014 0.50% 8.00% 2013 0.50% 8.00% 2012 0.50% 7.75% 2011 0.50% 8.75% Source: Commission Finance Department and California State Board of Equalization Since the end of the recent economic slowdown, changes have occurred in the economic categories in which the Measure A sales tax was generated (Table 62). General retail and transportation represent the two highest economic categories and approximately 55% of sales taxes generated. Transportation has improved in recent years due to high fuel prices and new auto purchases. Construction, which is comprised of the building materials wholesale and building materials retail segments, is a significant contributor and has shown slight improvement from previous years of declines due to the effects of the recession and housing slowdown. Table 62 - Sales Tax by Economic Category Economic Category 2011/4 2012/4 2013/4 2014/4 % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total General Retail 29.9% 29.0% 28.7% 28.4% Transportation 27.1% 27.0% 27.0% 26.6% Food Products 16.4% 16.4% 16.1% 16.6% Business to Business 14.1% 14.7% 14.5% 14.4% Construction 10.5% 10.9% 11.8% 12.0% Miscellaneous 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 2.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Source: MuniServices, LLC Each economic category consists of several economic segments, which provide additional information regarding economic activity in the County. In 2011 the top six economic segments consisted of service stations, department stores, auto sales -new, restaurants, building materials -wholesale, and miscellaneous retail. Over the next three calendar years, auto sales -new, restaurants, building materials -wholesale, and miscellaneous retail have improved. Auto sales -new, department stores, and restaurants now comprise the top three economic segments. The top six economic segments in 2014 with comparisons to previous years are presented in Table 63. Table 63 - Sales Tax by Economic Segment Top Six Economic Segments (Category) 2011/4 2012/4 2013/4 2014/4 % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total Auto Sales - New (Transportation) Department Stores (General Retail) Restaurants (Food Products) Service Stations (Transportation) Building Materials - Wholesale (Construction) Miscellaneous Retail (Miscellaneous) 9.1% 11.8% 10.3 % 12.9% 6.1% 6.6 % 10.0% 11.2% 10.0% 11.9 % 6.5 % 6.3 % 10.7 % 10.8 % 9.9 % 11.1% 7.3 % 6.8 % 10.9% 10.4% 10.4 % 10.3% 7.5% 7.0% Source: MuniServices, LLC Commission Facts Programs and Services Measure A: The Commission administers Measure A, the local half -cent sales tax for new transportation projects in the County. Under Measure A, funding is used to improve highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, local streets and roads, transit and specialized transportation services including commuter assistance, economic development, new corridors, and Commission administration. Measure A expires in 2039. Transportation Development Act: The TDA is comprised of two elements: Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance funding. The Commission administers the LTF one -quarter of one cent of the state sales tax on behalf of the County. STA is generated from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel and is allocated by the State to the Commission on the basis of population and as a percentage of transit fare revenues. TDA funding is allocated primarily to bus and rail transit operators for transit operating and capital needs. Additionally, LTF funding is available for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, planning, and administration and allocated to the Commission and local jurisdictions in the County. Highways: The Commission assists with the planning and funding for highway improvements. Major current projects include: 91 Project, SR-91 HOV lanes/Adams Street to the 60/91/215 interchange, 1-15 Express Lanes project, 1-215 corridor mobility improvement projects, and Mid County Parkway. State highway maintenance is generally the responsibility of Caltrans. Local Streets and Roads: The Commission administers funding to local jurisdictions to improve streets, intersections, signal coordination, and pavement. Local streets and roads maintenance is the responsibility of the local jurisdictions. Commuter Rail: The Commission funds and oversees Metrolink rail services within the County. The Commission's three Metrolink lines are the Riverside, IEOC, and 91/Perris Valley lines. The Commission owns and maintains five Metrolink stations located at: ➢ Riverside Downtown Station, 4066 Vine Street, Riverside ➢ La Sierra Station, 10901 Indiana Avenue, Riverside ➢ Pedley Station, 6001 Pedley Road, Riverside ➢ North Main Corona Station, 250 E. Blaine Street, Corona ➢ West Corona Station, 155 S. Auto Center Drive, Corona The Perris Valley Line, an extension of Metrolink commuter rail service in Western County, is expected to begin service in December 2015 to four additional stations: ➢ Riverside —Hunter Park, 1101 Marlborough Avenue, Riverside ➢ Moreno Valley/March Field, 14160 Meridian Parkway, Riverside ➢ Downtown Perris (also known as Perris Transit Center), 121 South C Street, Perris ➢ South Perris, 1304 Case Road, Perris Motorist Assistance: The Commission provides emergency call boxes and the 1E511 traveler information system through the SAFE and offers emergency towing services through the FSP. Commuter Assistance: The Commission provides a variety of rideshare services both to employers and commuters. Through voluntary participation, commuters and employers receive a direct benefit from their sales tax dollars, and the entire region benefits from reduced traffic congestion and improved air quality. Specialized Transit: The Commission maintains a strong commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its Specialized Transit Program, the Commission has provided millions of dollars to public and nonprofit transit operators to assist in the provisions of special transit services to improve the mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities. Appendix A — Glossary of Acronyms ADA — Americans with Disabilities Act ARRA* — American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ATP — Active Transportation Program BABs — Build America Bonds Bank of America — Bank of America, N.A. BTMU — The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch Bechtel — Bechtel Infrastructure BNSF — BNSF Railway Board — Board of Commissioners for the Riverside County Transportation Commission CABS — Capitalized Appreciation Bonds CAFR — Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CALCOG — California Association of Councils of Governments CaIPERS — California Public Employees Retirement System Ca!trans — California Department of Transportation CAGTC — Coalition for America's Gateways and Trade Corridors CEQA — California Environmental Quality Act CETAP — Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process CHP — California Highway Patrol CHSRA — California High Speed Rail Authority CIBs — Current Interest Bonds CIP — Capital Improvement Plan CMA — Congestion Management Agency CMAQ* — Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality CMIA* — Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (Proposition 1B funding category) CMP — Congestion Management Program CMS — Congestion Management System Commission — Riverside County Transportation Commission Coordinated Plan — Coordinated Public Transit —Human Services Transportation Plan County — County of Riverside CTC — California Transportation Commission CTSA — Consolidated Transportation Service Agency CVAG — Coachella Valley Association of Governments Deutsche Bank — Deutsche Bank AG District — Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District DBE — Disadvantaged Business Enterprise DMV — Department of Motor Vehicles DOL — Department of Labor ERP — Enterprise Resource Planning ETC — Employer Transportation Coordinators FHWA* — Federal Highway Administration Fitch — Fitch Ratings FRA — Federal Railroad Administration FSP — Freeway Service Patrol FTA* — Federal Transit Administration FTE — Full-time Equivalent FTIP — Federal Transportation Improvement Program FY — Fiscal Year Gann — Gann Initiative approved by California voters in 1979 GASB — Governmental Accounting Standards Board GFOA — Government Finance Officers Association GHG — Greenhouse Gas HOV — High Occupancy Vehicle (Carpool Lane) HSIPR — High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail I — Interstate 1E511 — Inland Empire 511 IEOC — Inland Empire —Orange County Metrolink Service IIP* — Interregional Improvement Program Inland Empire — Region covering Riverside and San Bernardino counties IVR — Interactive Voice Response JARC — Jobs Access Reverse Commute LIBOR — London Interbank Offer Rate Limited Tax Bonds — Indebtedness secured by a specified tax or group of taxes LOS — Level of Service LOSSAN — Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo, a rail corridor LTF* — Local Transportation Fund MAP-21 — Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21sT Century MARA — 2009 Measure A Regional Arterial funding for Western County Measure K — Increase of sales tax revenue bonds debt limit to $975 million approved by voters in November 2010 Metrolink — Operating Name for SCRRA (see SCRRA) Moody's — Moody's Investors Service MOE — Maintenance of Effort MOU — Memorandum of Understanding MPO — Metropolitan Planning Organization MSHCP — Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan MSRC — Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (AB2766) NEPA — National Environmental Policy Act OA — Obligation Authority OCTA — Orange County Transportation Authority PEPRA — Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 Perris Valley Line — Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project Ports — Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach PPM — Planning, Programming, and Monitoring RCA — Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority RCTC — Riverside County Transportation Commission RFA — Request for Authorization RIP* — Regional Improvement Program RTA — Riverside Transit Agency RTP — Regional Transportation Plan RZEDBs — Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds S&P — Standard & Poor's Rating Service SAFE — Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies SAFETEA-LU* — Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Sales Tax — Reference including transaction and use tax such as Measure A SANBAG — San Bernardino Associated Governments SB375 — Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg) California's Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act SB821 — Senate Bill 821 LTF Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds SBE — Small Business Enterprise SBOE — State Board of Equalization SBPAs — Standby Bond Purchase Agreements SCAG — Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SCRRA — Southern California Regional Rail Authority SCS — Sustainable Communities Strategy SDP — Service Development Plan Series A Tax -Exempt — Series of tax-exempt bonds issued under 2010 Bonds Series B Taxable — Series of taxable Build America Bonds issued under 2010 Bonds SHCC — Self -Help Counties Coalition SJBL — San Jacinto Branch Line SLPP* — State Local Partnership Program SR — State Route SRTP — Short Range Transit Plan STA* — State Transit Assistance State — State of California State Street Bank — State Street Bank and Trust Company STIP* — State Transportation Improvement Program STP* — Surface Transportation Program SunLine — SunLine Transit Agency TAC — Technical Advisory Committee TAP — Transportation Alternatives Program TCIF* — Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (Proposition 1B funding category) TDA* — Transportation Development Act TIFIA* — Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act TIP — Transportation Improvement Plan TUMF* — Transportation/Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (Western County/Coachella Valley) U.S. DOT — United States Department of Transportation Western County — Western area of Riverside County WRCOG — Western Riverside Council of Governments 91 Express Lanes — Tolled express lanes on SR-91 in Orange County operated by OCTA or in Riverside County to be operated by the Commission upon completion of the SR-91 corridor improvement project 1989 Measure A* — Original 1/2 cent transportation sales tax measure approved by voters in November 1988 that expired in June 2009 2009 Measure A* — Extension of sales tax measure approved by voters in November 2002 which became effective upon expiration of original sales tax measure on July 1, 2009 2009 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series A, B and C issued in October 2009 2010 Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series A Tax-exempt and Series B Taxable issued in November 2010 2013 Sales Tax Bonds — Sales Tax Revenue Bonds anticipated to be issued in July 2013 2013 Toll Bonds — Toll Revenue Bonds anticipated to be issued in July 2013 * Additional information provided in Funding Definitions. Appendix B - Salary Schedule Effective 7/9/2015 Range Monthly Monthly Exempt/Non- Department/Position FTE No. Minimum Maximum Exempt ADMINISTRATION Administrative Assistant Clerk of the Board Deputy Clerk of the Board Human Resources Administrator Records Technician Senior Administrative Assistant Senior Office Assistant Administration Subtotal: 1.0 17 $ 3,869 $ 5,223 NE 1.0 45 $ 7,660 $ 10,340 E 1.0 25 $ 4,702 $ 6,348 NE 1.0 45 $ 7,660 $ 10,340 E 1.0 17 $ 3,869 $ 5,223 NE 1.0 25 $ 4,702 $ 6,348 NE 1.0 13 $ 3,509 $ 4,737 NE 7irli. - CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY Capital Projects Manager 5.0 53 $ 9,310 $ 12,569 E Facilities Administrator 1.0 45 $ 7,660 $ 10,340 E Project Delivery Director 1.0 67 $ 13,100 $ 17,686 E Right of Way Manager 1.0 53 $ 9,310 $ 12,569 E Senior Management Analyst 3.0 43 $ 7,295 $ 9,848 E Management Analyst 1.0 35 $ 6,001 $ 8,102 E Toll Operations Manager 1.0 63 $ 11,883 $ 16,041 E Toll Program Director 1.0 71 $ 14,443 $ 19,498 E Toll Project Manager 2.0 65 $ 12,477 $ 16,843 E Toll Technology Manager 1.0 53 $ 9,310 $ 12,569 E Capital Project Development and Delivery Subtotal: 17.0 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT Deputy Executive Director 1.0 75 $ 15,924 $ 21,497 E Executive Director 1.0 83 $ 19,355 $ 26,130 E ' Executive Management Subtotal: 2.0 FINANCE Accountant 1.0 33 $ 5,716 $ 7,716 E Accounting Assistant 1.0 17 $ 3,869 $ 5,223 NE Accounting Supervisor 1.0 33 $ 5,716 $ 7,716 E Accounting Technician 2.0 25 $ 4,702 $ 6,348 NE Chief Financial Officer 1.0 67 $ 13,100 $ 17,686 E Deputy Director of Finance 1.0 57 $ 10,141 $ 13,691 E Procurement Analyst 1.0 36 $ 6,148 $ 8,300 E Procurement Manager 1.0 53 $ 9,310 $ 12,569 E Finance Subtotal: 9.0 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS & COMMUNICATIONS Goods Movement Manager 1.0 51 $ 8,867 $ 11,970 E Government Relations Manager 1.0 51 $ 8,867 $ 11,970 E Public Affairs Manager 1.0 51 $ 8,867 $ 11,970 E 7 Legislative Affairs and Communications Subtotal: 3.0 MULTIMODAL SERVICES Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 1.0 51 $ 8,867 $ 11,970 E Multimodal Services Director 1.0 63 $ 11,883 $ 16,041 E Management Analyst 2.0 35 $ 6,001 $ 8,102 E Transit Manager 1.0 51 $ 8,867 $ 11,970 E Multimodal Services Subtotal: 5.0 PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES Planning and Programming Director 1.0 63 $ 11,883 $ 16,041 E Planning and Programming Manager 1.0 51 $ 8,867 $ 11,970 E Senior Management Analyst 1.0 43 $ 7,295 $ 9,848 E Management Analyst 1.0 35 $ 6,001 $ 8,102 E Planning and Programming Services Subtotal: 4.0 RAIL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Rail Manager 1.0 51 $ 8,867 $ 11,970 E Management Analyst 1.0 35 $ 6,001 $ 8,102 E Rail Maintenance and Operations Subtotal: 2.0 - TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Administration 7.0 Capital Project Development and Delivery 17.0 Executive Management 2.0 Finance 9.0 Legislative Affairs and Communications 3.0 Multimodal Services 5.0 Planning and Programming Services 4.0 Rail Maintenance and Operations 2.0 Total Authorized 49.0 Appendix C — Funding Definitions Federal Funding Sources Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act The TIFIA program provides credit assistance for qualified projects of regional and national significance that are critical improvements to the nation's surface transportation system. It is designed to fill market gaps and leverage substantial private and non-federal co -investment by providing supplemental and subordinate capital. TIFIA credit assistance is often available on more advantageous terms than in the financial market making it possible to obtain financing, in the form of a secured loan, loan guarantee, and/or standby line of credit, for needed projects when it might not otherwise be possible. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Commonly referred to as the Stimulus or The Recovery Act, ARRA is an economic stimulus package "intended to create jobs and promote investment and consumer spending" during the recent recession. It includes domestic spending in infrastructure with investment transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure providing long-term economic benefits. ARRA also created the Build America Bond program, which authorized state and local governments to issue in 2009 and 2010 such bonds as taxable bonds to finance capital expenditures for which would otherwise be financed with tax-exempt governmental bonds. State and local governments issuing BABs receive a direct federal subsidy payment for a portion of their borrowing costs on BABs equal to 35 to 45 percent of the total coupon interest paid to investors. The BAB program was intended to assist state and local governments finance capital projects at lower borrowing costs and to stimulate the economy and create jobs. Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 formula funds made available to urbanized areas for operating subsidies, capital projects and planning. Operating match is up to 50% of the net operating cost; capital and planning match is 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5309 discretionary funds generally provided to urbanized areas for funding new start rail projects, major bus fleet replacement, and transit facility construction. Matching ratios range from 50/50 to 80% federal and 20% local. Section 5310 funds made available to states for providing capital support to private non-profit and, in certain circumstances, public transit operators. This is a state administered discretionary program providing funds on an 88.53% federal and 11.47% local basis. Section 5311 funds provided to support rural transit operating subsidies and capital projects. Operating match is up to 50% of the net operating cost; capital match is 80% federal and 20% local. Federal Highway Administration In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) was approved by Congress to replace the former Federal Aid Urban/Federal Aid System funding programs. ISTEA was established as a six -year funding program and was reauthorized for another six years in 1997. This new transportation act was renamed as the Transportation Equity Act of the Twenty-first Century (TEA21) and was extended through August 10, 2005 when the President signed into law SAFETEA-LU. With guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation totaling $244.1 billion, SAFETEA-LU represents the largest surface transportation investment in our nation's history. Under these programs the following fund sources are allocated to each county, and the Commission further allocates these funds based on federal provisions. Surface Transportation Program Funds allocated by the Commission and administered by Caltrans that provide funding for local street and road improvements. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds allocated by the Commission for transportation related air quality improvement projects in air quality non -attainment areas. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. Safety projects can qualify for 100% of CMAQ funding. Transportation Enhancements The amount of funds made available under this program is 10% of the state apportionment of STP funds. Projects are qualified and prioritized by the Commission and submitted to the California Transportation Commission for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program. The basic definition of a transportation enhancement project is an improvement that is over and above the base transportation project. Project categories are pedestrian and bicycle facilities, scenic or historic highways, scenic beautification, historic preservation, rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities, preservation of abandoned railway corridors, control/removal of outdoor advertising, archaeological planning and research, and mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47% local. State Local Funding Sources State Transportation Improvement Program The STIP consists of RIP and IIP funds. The RIP and IIP programs are mainly supported by Proposition 42 funding. The RIP component represents 75% of STIP funds available for capacity projects. Regional Transportation Planning Agencies are responsible for selection of projects proposed for RIP funds. The IIP component represents the remaining 25% of STIP funds available for capacity projects and Caltrans is responsible for the selection of IIP-funded projects. The Commission and Caltrans District 8 work closely in coordinating projects for these fund sources. Proposition 1B Program In November 2006, the voters in California approved Proposition 1B, which will fund various transportation programs from bonds issued by the state of California. Programs to be funded include CMIA, transit capital (PTMISEA), transit security (CTSGP-CTAF), STIP supplement, goods movement (TCIF), SLPP funds, and cities and counties. Transportation Development Act The TDA is comprised of two elements: LTF and STA funds. LTF funds are derived from 1/4 of one cent of the state sales tax and are returned to source. There are three areas of apportionment within Riverside County comprised of Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley (Blythe). The Commission administers the LTF on behalf of the County of Riverside. Funds are provided for program administration, Southern California Association of Governments regional planning, local transportation planning, and transit services in Western County and the Coachella Valley. In the Palo Verde Valley, funds support transit services and local street and road improvements. Additionally, under SB 821, 2% of LTF funds are made available for bicycle and pedestrian projects. STA funds are generated from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel and are allocated by the state to the Commission based on population and as a percentage of transit fare revenue. The Commission has generally used these funds to support capital purchases and improvements as these funds have been subject to state budgetary actions. Local Funding Sources Measure A Measure A is a half -cent local retail transaction and use tax that was initially approved by the voters in November 1988 for 20 years (Ordinance 88-1) and extended in November 2002 for an additional 30 years (Ordinance 02-001), through June 2039, to help fund key transportation improvements in Riverside County. It provides funds to improve highways, regional arterials, and local streets and roads; to develop new transportation corridors; to expand commuter rail, public transit, specialized transportation services, and commuter programs; develop a program of economic incentives to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs; and support bond financing. These types of improvements are needed to maintain and improve the quality of life in the County, reduce current congestion, and provide adequate transportation facilities to accommodate reasonable growth. Since existing state and federal sources provide only a limited amount of funding for a limited number of projects, Measure A will cover the shortfall for key projects with a funding source that is under local control. It will use the revenue generated in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley to meet the unique transportation needs of each of those areas. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee The TUMF program was adopted by all local jurisdictions in the Western County area of Riverside County in July 2003. Under this program, which is administered by the WRCOG, fees are assessed on new residential and commercial development in Western County to ensure that new development pays its fair share toward providing the needed infrastructure improvements on the regional system of highways and arterials. In accordance with the extension of Measure A in 2002 and an amended Memorandum of Understanding with WRCOG, the Commission shall receive 48.7% of the TUMF revenues to fund equally the regional arterial system and the development of new corridors. Appendix D — Program Terms The following explanations of terms are presented to aid in understanding the various program terms used and discussed in the narrative. Bicycle and Pedestrian LTF provides revenues for the construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and related right-of-way costs. Bond Financing In order to accomplish the construction of the highway and rail projects and implementation of the local streets and roads and other programs identified in the Measure A TIP as soon as possible, some level of borrowing will be required. A portion of the revenues generated in the Western County will be made available for this purpose. Commuter Assistance The purpose of this program is to provide short-term incentives to encourage single occupant vehicle drivers to use alternate modes of transportation including carpools, vanpools, bus pools, public bus, commuter rail, walking, and bicycling. Commuter Rail Measure A provides operating and capital revenue for commuter rail service to Orange and Los Angeles counties. LTF provides revenue for commuter rail operations in Riverside County. These trains operate on existing railroad tracks parallel to major freeways. Commuter rail service provides a safe and reliable transit alternative to driving alone during the peak period. Plans to expand commuter rail service in Western Riverside County from Riverside to Perris via Moreno Valley are currently underway. Economic Development Measure A will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve existing interchanges, construct new interchanges, provide public transit linkages or stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system in Western County. These incentives are intended to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate within the Western County area. Highways Measure A provides revenues to widen existing highways, expand interchanges, and improve remote freeways. These improvements are needed to control traffic congestion in Western County and improve access and safety in Coachella Valley. Costs of these improvements will be covered by funds from state and federal sources. Measure A revenue will be used to supplement —not replace —these other sources and to accelerate work on projects deferred for lack of funding. Local Streets and Roads Measure A provides revenues to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. The County and local cities are required to supplement those expenditures with other previously dedicated revenue sources to maintain road improvements at a level equal to or greater than the base year amount. LTF provides revenue for local street and road improvements in the Palo Verde Valley. Metrolink The Commission's commuter rail program is part of the regional network operated by SCRRA operating under the name of Metrolink, a five -county joint powers agency composed of the transportation commission's of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, and Ventura. The purpose of this agency is to manage the operation and maintenance of commuter rail in the five -county metropolitan area. Motorist Assistance The Motorist Assistance program has three elements. The FSP is a special team of tow trucks that travel on selected Riverside County freeways during peak commute hours to assist drivers when their cars break down. Another element is the call box system, which installation and operation is made possible with revenue provided by the public. Call boxes are being provided by the Commission, which serves as the County's SAFE. The third element is the Inland Empire 511 traveler information system. One dollar per year from every motor vehicle registration pays for the call boxes and their operation and maintenance, 1E511 operations, and matching funds for FSP. New Corridors Four new transportation corridors were identified through the CETAP. Measure A and TUMF funds will be used for environmental clearance, right of way, and construction of these new corridors. Public Transit The Commission is the agency responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming and coordinating the operation of all public transportation service within the County. The Commission allocates and disburses TDA as well as Measure A funds to the transit operators for operating and capital purposes. Regional Arterials Measure A funds generated within the Western County and Coachella Valley areas are used for major regional road projects. The system is to be implemented with a mix of funding required from new development under a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee to be paid by developers from new development and from Measure A funds returned to the Western County and Coachella Valley areas. The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee schedule shall be established in order to generate at least the equivalent of Measure A funding toward the regional arterial system. Specialized Transit Measure A provides public transit revenues to improve transportation services for seniors, persons with disabilities and commuters. For seniors and persons with disabilities, it provides dial -a -ride cab service at night for emergency purposes, guarantees half-price bus fares, and assists centers with their transit programs. For commuters, it improves express bus service and expands ridesharing programs. In the Coachella Valley, revenues also are available for bus replacement and local bus service. Transportation Improvement Plan This plan also acts as the County's expenditure plan and was prepared by the Commission for the proposed 1/2% local retail transaction and use tax for transportation purposes to be collected. This was proposed by the Commission as a means to fill the funding shortfall to implement needed highway, regional arterial, economic development incentives, and new corridors; local street and road programs; commuter rail projects and operations; public bus transit and specialized transportation improvements; commuter assistance programs; and bond financing. Appendix E — General Terms The following explanations of terms are presented to aid in understanding the narrative discussions and illustrations included in this budget document and the terminology generally used in governmental accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and budgeting. Accountability The state of being obliged to explain one's actions, to justify what one does. Accountability requires a government to answer to its citizenry to justify the raising of public resources and the purposes for which they are used. Accounting System The methods and records established to identify, assemble, analyze, classify, record, and report a government's transactions and to maintain accountability for the related assets and liabilities. Accrual Basis of Accounting The accounting of the financial effects of transactions, events, and interfund activities when they occur, regardless of when cash is received or paid. Audit A systematic collection of the sufficient, competent evidential matter needed to attest to the fairness of management's assertions in the financial statements or to evaluate whether management has efficiently and effectively carried out its responsibilities. The auditor obtains this evidential matter through inspection, observation, inquiries, and confirmations with third parties. Balanced Budget The identification of revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances to fund operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses on an annual basis. Basis of Accounting A term used to refer to when the effects of transactions or events are recognized for financial reporting purposes. For example, the timing of recognition can be when the transaction or event occurs (accrual basis) or when cash is received or paid (cash basis). Bond A written promise to pay a specified sum of money (face or principal amount) at a specified date or dates in the future (maturity date), together with periodic interest at a specified rate. Bonds are primarily used to finance capital projects. Budget A plan of financial activity for a specified period indicating all planned revenues and expenditures for the budget period. Annual budgets are usually required by law and are essential to sound financial management. The Commission prepares an annual budget that is applicable to a single fiscal year. Budgetary Control The control or management of a government in accordance with an approved budget to keep expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. Budget Document The instrument used by the budget -making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the appropriating governing body. Capital Outlay Expenditures resulting in the acquisition of or addition to the government's capital assets or assets to be transferred to Caltrans, such as highway projects. Capital Project A long-term strategic project requiring relatively large sums of revenues, accumulated reserves, and/or financing to acquire, develop, construct, improve, and/or maintain a capital asset such as land, buildings, and infrastructure. Capital Projects Fund A governmental fund type created to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital projects. The Commission has two capital projects funds for Commercial Paper and Sales Tax Bonds to account for debt proceeds from 2009 Measure A commercial paper notes and sales tax revenue bonds related to highway, commuter rail, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects. Commercial Paper An unsecured short-term promissory note issued primarily by corporations with maturities ranging from two to 270 days. The credit risk of almost all commercial paper is rated by a rating service. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report A financial report that encompasses all funds of the government. In the financial section of the CAFR are the basic financial statements and required supplementary information as well as combining and individual fund financial statements, as necessary. The CAFR also contains introductory information and statistical data. Current Financial Resources Measurement Focus A measurement focuses that reports on the near -term or current inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable financial resources. This focus is unique to accounting and financial reporting for state and local governments and is used for reporting the financial position and results of operations of governmental funds. Debt An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and services. Debts of governments include bonds, time warrants, and notes. Debt Coverage Ratio The ratio of pledged revenues to related debt service for a given year. Debt Limit The maximum amount of outstanding gross or net debt legally permitted. Debt Proceeds The difference between the face amount of debt and the issuance discount or the sum of the face amount and the issuance premium. Debt proceeds differ from cash receipts to the extent issuance costs, such as underwriters' fees, are withheld by the underwriter. Debt Service Fund A governmental fund type created to account for the accumulation of resources for and payment of general long-term debt principal and interest. The Commission has one debt service fund for its sales tax revenue bonds. Expenditures Represents decreases in net financial resources on the transfer of property or services for acquiring an asset, service, or settling a loss. Financial Advisor In the context of the issuance of debt, a consultant who advises the issuer on any of a variety of matters related to the issuance. The financial advisor sometimes also is referred to as the fiscal consultant. Financial Audit An audit made to provide independent assurance whether the financial statements of a government are presented fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Financial Resources Resources that are or will become available for spending and include cash, resources ordinarily expected to be converted to cash such as receivables, inventory, and prepaid assets. Fiscal Year For the Commission, the 12-month period that begins July 1 and ends June 30 of the designated fiscal or operating year for accounting and budgeting purposes. Fund A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts in which cash and other financial resources, all related liabilities, and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, are recorded and segregated to carry on specific activities or attain certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. Fund Balance The excess of a governmental fund's assets over its liabilities. Fund Type Any one of eleven classifications into which all funds are categorized in governmental accounting. Governmental fund types include general, special revenue, debt service, capital projects, and permanent funds. Proprietary fund types include enterprise and internal service funds. Fiduciary fund types include pension trust, investment trust, and private -purpose trust funds and agency funds. GASB 45 Statement No. 45, Accounting for Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB), issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board and implemented by the Commission in FY 2007/08. GASB 45 requires recognition of postretirement health care costs on an accrual basis over a period approximating the employees' years of service and to provide information about actuarial accrued liabilities associated with these benefits and whether and to what extent progress is being made in funding the plan. GASB 68 Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions, issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board to be implemented by the Commission for FY 2014/15. GASB 48 requires reporting the net pension liability of the plan on the accrual accounting -based financial statements and enhancing the notes to the financial statements to provide a more comprehensive picture of the pension obligation and costs. General Fund The governmental fund type used to account for all financial resources, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. General Ledger A record containing the accounts needed to reflect the financial position and the results of operations of a government. In double -entry bookkeeping, debit balances equal the credit balances in the general ledger. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Minimum standards and guidelines for financial accounting and reporting. GAAP encompasses the conventions, rules, and procedures that serve as the norm for the fair presentation of financial statements. The GASB is the primary authoritative accounting and financial reporting standard -setting body on the application of GAAP to state and local governments. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) Rules and procedures established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for the conduct of a financial audit. There are ten basic GAAS, classified into three broad categories: general standards, standards of fieldwork, and standards of reporting. The Auditing Standards Board of the AICPA publishes Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS) and related interpretations to comment and expand upon these basic standards. Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) Standards established by the General Accounting Office (GAO) in its publication, Government Auditing Standards, for the conduct and reporting of both financial and performance audits in the public sector. GAGAS set forth general standards applicable to both types of audits and separate standards of fieldwork and reporting for financial and performance audits. The GAGAS standards of fieldwork and reporting for financial audits incorporate and build upon GAAS. Governmental Funds Funds generally used to account for tax -supported activities. The Commission's governmental funds are comprised of general, special revenue, debt service, and capital projects funds. Grant A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function or program. Independent Auditor An auditor meeting the independence criteria set forth in GAAS and GAGAS. Internal Control Policies and procedures established to provide reasonable assurance that specific government objectives will be achieved. Legal Level of Budgetary Control The level at which a government's management may not reallocate resources without special approval from the legislative body. Loans Receivable An asset account reflecting amounts loaned to individuals or organizations external to the Commission, including notes taken as security for such loans. Measurement Focus The objective of a measurement that is what is being expressed in reporting a government's financial performance and position. A particular measurement focus considers not only which resources are measured (financial or economic), but also when the effects of transactions or events involving those resources are recognized (basis of accounting). The measurement focus of the Commission's government - wide and fiduciary fund financial statements is economic resources, whereas the measurement focus of governmental fund financial statements is current financial resources. Modified Accrual Basis The accrual basis of accounting adapted to the governmental funds' measurement focus according to which revenues and other financial resource increments (e.g., bond issue proceeds) are recognized when they become susceptible to accrual, that is when they become both "measurable" and "available to finance expenditures of the current period." Expenditures are recognized when the fund liability is incurred except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt and certain similar accrued obligations when due. The Commission's governmental funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Other Financing Sources Amounts classified separately from revenues to avoid distorting revenue trends that represent an increase in current financial resources. Other financing sources generally include general long-term debt proceeds, amounts equal to the present value of minimum lease payments arising from capital leases, proceeds from the sale of capital assets, and transfers in. Other Financing Uses Amounts classified separately from expenditures to avoid distorting expenditure trends and represent a decrease in current financial resources. Other financing uses generally include transfers out and the amount of refunding bond proceeds deposited with the escrow agent. Overhead Indirect costs that cannot be specifically associated with a given service, program, or department and thus, cannot be clearly associated with a particular functional category. Principal In the context of bonds other than deep -discount debt, the face value or par value of a bond or issue of bonds payable on stated dates of maturity. Program Group activities, operations, or organizational units directed to attaining specific purposes or objectives. Program Budget A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on the functions or activities of a government rather than to specific items of cost or to specific departments. Purchase Order A document authorizing the delivery of specified merchandise or the rendering of certain services and the making of a charge for them. Refunding Bonds Bonds issued to retire bonds already outstanding. The proceeds of refunding bonds may be used to repay the previously issued debt (current refunding) or to be placed with an escrow agent and invested until used to pay principal and interest on old debt at a future date (advance refunding). Reimbursement Grant A grant for which a potential recipient must first incur qualifying expenditures to be eligible. Restricted Fund Balance Those portions of fund balance which are restricted for specific purposes by third parties or enabling legislation. Special Revenue Fund A governmental fund type used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes. The Commission maintains special revenue funds for Measure A Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley; Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee; Freeway Service Patrol; Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies; State Transit Assistance; Local Transportation Fund; Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass; and Other Agency Projects. Transfers All interfund transfers representing flows of assets between funds of the government without equivalent flows of assets in return and without a requirement for repayments. Trustee A fiduciary holding property on behalf of another. uoisspauo) uopotiodsuoul /ono) appam 9I/STOZ HV3A 1V3Sid mane a3S0dOlid i 991 ',y: I. • - Budget Adjustments FY 2015/16 Ending Fund Balance (as reported 5/13/15) Projected FY 2015 Adjustments: Increase in state reimbursements and other revenues Increase in construction Decrease in transit operating and capital distributions Budget FY 2016 Adjustments: Increase in state reimbursements Decrease in investment income Decrease in operating transfers in Increase in construction Increase in right of way Increase in transit operating and capital distributions Decrease in operating transfers out FY 2015/16 Ending Fund Balance (per final budget 6/10/15) Fund Balance $ 585,871,800 565,000 (565,000) 3,584,000 50,000 (34,000) (4,899,400) (50,000) (100,000) (17,126,100) 4,899,400 $ 572,195,700 (006`£Z9`65Z) (00eZ86'8£0`T) 008139£`6LL sash/saanwuadx3 aapun sa3anos/sanuanaa 0017'LL0'9EZ$ 006'6i6`ES $ OWS86`8178$ �np saajsueu. a3vuas lgaa. sa.muuadx3. sash/saimvuadx3 palewps3 le�ol OOb'LLO'9ET$ ul saajsueal. 006'LLZ'T9Z$ spaaooad ueo3 VI31±. OOS'ETO`Z8E$ sanuana8. samios/sanuanaa paleitigs3 le�ol 009`608`Z£8 $ apueleg pun3 Suiuu!Sag 008189£`6LL $ 0017`LLO`9£I 006'LLZ`I9Z 00£`95eZ 000'5£7 008`£SO'ZI OOZ`55et7 005`O55'617 00£`068`917 OOti`ZL£`£I 000`000`£8 000'000'OLI $ N sapanos/sanuanab lelol ui saajsueu spaaaoad ueol vijii salmos auaopui luawisanul CD sanuanaa aau10 fp -II JWni = -< C N sluauaasanquaiaa lexo' M p F, sluawasanqu pi awls N trl sluawas.ingw!aa leaapaj N 01 xei. saleS VlS n nD xei sales jil to xei sales d aanseaw sanuanab %b£- 008`89£`6LL $ 00S`69S`T8L $ OOL`TOZ`LLT'T $ 00L`080`OSS`T $ %17L- 00-VLL0`9£T %9£ 006`LLZ`T9Z WN 00T`S£017SZ 000`6S049TT 00n99`9ZS 000'009'16T OOL`L861817 00T`OSL`17L9 %LT- OOS`£TO'ZS£ 00.7'SL17`TTti 009`0176'8S17 006`Z17£`£6£ %0 00£`9S17`Z 000'8£T`17 006`0517'Z %6S- 000`S£Z OOZ`TZZ 000`SLS %t- 008`£SO'ZT OOL`Z170`ZT 009`17ST`ZT %T£- 00Z`SS1717 00817££'S 0001917`9 %917- 00S`OSS`617 00S'8Z9'09 0004£0S`Z6 %1717- 00£`068`917 00S`S99`L9 0017`TS£`£8 %£ 0017'ZL£`£T 00L`17176'ZT 00n7176`ZT %Z 000'000`£8 000`00S`T8 000`00S`T8 00Z`b17S`LL %Z 000'000'0LT $ 000`000`L9T $ 000`000'L9T $ 008`SS£`9ST $ ague43 luaDaad 9t/STOZ AA SZ/KOZ AA St/VTOZ AA tit/£ZOZ AA 006`6L6`6 OOT`T80`T 0017`178Z`TT OOS'LLS'T OOZ'L6L`Z8 0017`£T£`8£ 0017`601717T sapanos/sanuana8 lelol ul saa}sueal spaa3wd ueol VIJI1 tau `spaapoad lgaa sanuana8 lelol awoDul Tuaunsanul sanuanaaaaynp mu ni sluawasangw!aa leaol sluawasanqualaa alelS sluawasanqualaa leaapad xe1 saleS `d1S xe1 sales ill xe1 sales y aansealN 111111MilliM= 11111 Total Expenditures/Uses 101,038,982, Management Services Expenditures $9,013,600 Debt Service Expenditures Regional Programs Expenditures $159,722,100 Transfers Out Uses $136,077, 400 16 Capital Project Development & Delivery Expenditures r . 4 .,4 ti I Management Services RCTC Executive Management Administration Legislative Affairs and Communications* Finance Debt Service Total Expenditures Transfers Out Total Management Services FY 2013/ 14 FY 2014/ 15 FY 2014/ 15 FY 2015/ 16 Budget -in 474,600 $ 523,400 $ 542,500 305,300 $ 1,340,600 917,200 4,435,400 22,900 2,304,500 1,189,400 5,366,700 1,991,800 974,800 4,925,300 1,987,800 1,516,400 4,966,900 7,021,400 9,335,200 8,415,300 9,013,600 5,000,000 5,047,700 5,000,000 9,007,900 $ 12,021,400 $ 14,382,900 $ 13,415,300 $ 18,021,500 000'9t1$ Laoddns 0001Z0t$ leuoissajoad OOZ'ZtiZ$ lauuosaad *suoifepiunwwco OOL'Zt$ laoddns OOZ`9ZE$ euoissajoad OOE`8SE$ puuosaad smelly ann.eis!Sai %LZ 000'LZE $ OO1719ZS`Z $ 00-17`68Z`Z $ OOeLZ6 $ (A -CZ OOZ`ZE OOL`L8Z OOS`SSZ OOS'9tiZ %6E 000`SOZ OOZ`8ZL OOZ`EZS 006'ZSE %8Z 008'68 $ 00S'009 $ 00L`OIS $ 008`81-17 $ aSuan adeqi aenoa lapng 11109r62png pasinag , FMV lualaad 9Z/SZ Ad ST/til Ai WEI Ad 1b'1O1 voddnS * leuoissaload lauuosaad saapuatix3 suogepiunt.uwo0 pue saie��d ani�e�si�a� *suopeoiunwuaoo pue s.ijejjv aNleis!Sai ,- i r ,ss- _-4 %£ aauelslssd IslaoloW pazllepadg pue al#cind 00£`L60`981 $ OOi`ii6`0Zi $ 000708'69T $ 000`98£'Sii $ 00Z'SL£`9Z OOL'L170`8i 00Z`17£08i 009`808`£i 00i`ZZL`6Si 00ti`£98`ZOi 00VOLVISi 00VLLS'i0i 00Z`i6VS 0017`9£ti`t 00i'Z8917 00£1L89`£ 006`SOS`£ 006'S6Z'£ 00Z`i99`Lii 00i`i86`SL 00L`80£`6ii 000'81£`9Z 0081798`tii 009`Z00`8i 0017179S`9 $ OOZ'SLO`t $ 008`088'S $ 9Z/SiOZ Ad SI/VIOZ Ad Si/biOZ A� OOti'86ti`£ OOi`9£i`£ 00£`LSVO8 OOS`L£6`ii OOi`8t7S`Z %Li Suppeaado pue aaueualul.el lleti i %V 2uluauaea2oad pue Suluueld suaea wd leuopu le�ol �np saajsueal saamlpuadx3 lelol aDuelslssy IsuoloW @Duelslssy aainuauaoO ilsueal pail mods pue Dggnd suoReaado pue aDueualuleN I1eu saDvuas 2uluauae.a wd pue 8uluueld " Capital Project Development & 11 Delivery Expenditures/Uses Capital Program Expenditures/Uses 2014/15; FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 Salaries and benefits $ 2,736,300 $ 3,652,300 $ 3,782,200 $ 4,370,400 Professional costs 7,470,700 8,478,100 5,739,300 8,760,100 Support costs 290,400 1,052,400 366,800 587,600 Projects and operations: Program operations 9,248,200 13,969,300 10,413,200 11,471,500 Engineering 12,725,800 17,709,000 10,203,700 17,844,900 Construction 90,669,000 240,435,200 158,376,000 149,362,600 Design build 157,564,700 255,303,500 227,943,000 284,681,200 Right of way and land 91,297,400 186,945,900 65,715,300 105,312,400 Local streets and roads 46,677,100 49,882,000 49,882,000 50,679,000 Regional arterials 13,902,700 30,400,000 22,397,800 30,600,000 Other (special studies/operating & capital disbursements) 71,100 11,020,000 6,407,000 16,580,000 Debt service 117,551,100 54,696,200 54,696,200 53,919,900 Total Expenditures 550,204,500 873,543,900 615,922,500 734,169,600 Transfers out 463,179,100 502,979,200 230,987,400 100,694,300 Total Capital Project Development & Delivery $ 1,013,383,600 $ 1,376,523,100 $ 846,909,900 $ 834,863,900 %Z 2UpeauPu3 %b slepatie leuopaa 9 spew pue spans le3o1 %£i puel pue Aenn;o N2m %b£ pllnq Asa(' yogi uonannsuco %t suonwaao uaeaawd %8L suonwado rg spafoad %Zt Ino sia;sue.il 1 Personnel Professional Support Projects and operations Capital outlay Debt service Total Expenditures Transfers out Total Expenditures/Uses x Personnel, Professional, Support & Capital Outlay Expenditures t Mr- $3:6,599,S-00 Functional Uses Breakdown FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 Budget _ Budget $ 6,877,400 $ 8,330,300 $ 8,271,200 $ 9,499,800 12,863,400 15,811,100 12,506,600 16,301,000 3,305,500 518,117,700 65,300 117,574,000 658,803,300 481,987,700 $ 1,140,791,000 5,867,400 945,494,200 3,850,000 54,696,200 1,034,049,200 526,661,100 $ 1,560,710,300 4,271,600 646,283,800 1,171,800 54,696,200 727,201,200 254,035,100 $ 981,236,300 7,005,200 812,385,900 3,793,500 53,919,900 902,905,300 136,077,400 $ 1,038,982,700 Projects & Operations Expenditures $812,385,91:14 i Transfers Out Uses 36,077,400 (0' ' o/000 ti o/oscz 01' 0b,s22 0/0002 0i05cs opgs gosts of000 s oi05co 00° 0520 0/000 0 I i' %Zo'Z %66'0 `s;sop enRensiu!wpd s4gauae pue se9eieS i I 4a2pn9 9T/STOZ Al sluawasanquaiaa awls pue ieaapa} to ssaugami spuan anuanaa dWfll pue sales • -MOM. sameaado pue spafoad aoj spaau Buipun j slgauaq pue sapeies saovuas luawaeuew y aanseaW uiaoliuoua anuguop lapnq ieuq aye dope pue `STOZ/6/L anpa}}a ainpaips Metes aye anoadde Tupeaq oggnd pip asop luauanaop lapnq ieui .aye mainai apnq ldope pue &gnat./ mqnd asap sdals lx@N �. AGENDA ITEM 8A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2015. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the last nine months of the fiscal year, staff monitored the revenues and expenditures of the Commission. The attached financial statements present the revenues and expenditures for the nine months of the fiscal year. Period closing accrual adjustments are not included for revenues earned but not billed and expenditures incurred for goods and services received but not yet invoiced, as such adjustments are normally made during the year-end closing activities. The operating statement shows the sales tax revenues for the third quarter at 56 percent of the budget. This is a result of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 33. GASB 33 requires sales tax revenues to be accrued for the period in which it is collected at the point of sale. The State Board of Equalization collects the Measure A funds and remits these funds to the Commission after the reporting period for the businesses. This creates a two -month lag in the receipt of revenues by the Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements reflect the revenues related to collections through January 2015. On a cash basis, the Measure A and Local Transportation Fund (LTF) sales tax revenues are 5.15 percent and 6.69 percent higher, respectively, than the same period last fiscal year. At the January 14 Commission meeting, staff presented the revised FY 2014/15 revenue projections and staff recommended the Commission maintain the current year revenue projections for Measure A and LTF revenues of $167 million and $81.5 million, respectively. State Transit Assistance Fund receipts of $6.2 million for FY 2014/15 have been received through March 2015. Staff will continue to monitor the trends in the sales tax receipts and report to the Commission any necessary adjustments. Federal, state, and local revenues are on a reimbursement basis. The Commission will receive these revenues as eligible project costs are incurred and invoiced to the respective agencies. Agenda Item 8A 4 Significant federal and state reimbursements to date are related to the Perris Valley Line (PVL) and Interstate 215 corridor improvement projects. During the FY 2014/15 budget process, the Commission took a conservative approach to estimate the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of $8 million passed through from the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). At the January 14 Commission meeting, staff presented the revised FY 2014/15 revenue projections and increased the TUMF revenues to $12 million. The Commission received TUMF receipts through January 2015. The budgeted balance of $154,600 relates to TUMF zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the 74/215 interchange project. Staff will invoice WRCOG for TUMF zone reimbursements as eligible expenditures are incurred through the fourth quarter. Other revenues include property management revenues generated from properties acquired in connection with the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) and various rail properties. Interest income is higher in the third quarter as a result of the investment earnings in connection with the 2013 sales tax revenue bond and 2013 toll revenue bond proceeds, and the conservative approach the Commission took in estimating investment income. The expenditure and other financing source/use categories are in line overall with the expectations of the budget for the third quarter with the following exceptions or noted matters: • Salaries and benefits are in line with the expectations of the budget through March 2015; • Professional services expenditures are under budget due to unused budget authority for rail and station development planning, financial advisory management, and various projects' legal services. Staff anticipates using more budget authority by the fourth quarter; • Support costs are under budget due to unused budget authority for the marketing of new rail service and rail safety advertisements, rail operations and station maintenance, and motorist assistance call box upgrades. Staff anticipates using more budget authority by the fourth quarter; • Program operations are under budget due to unused budget authority for the 91 Project permit activities; Freeway Service Patrol and Motorist and Commuter Assistance program operations; and rail program management and operations related to the PVL. Staff anticipates using most of the budget authority by the fourth quarter; • Engineering, construction, design -build, and right of way/land expenditures relate to various capital projects. The status of significant capital projects with budgets exceeding $5 million is discussed is attached; • Operating and capital disbursements are made as claims are submitted to the Commission by transit operators; Agenda Item 8A 5 " Special studies are under budget due to unused budget authority for toll operations and rail feasibility studies. The Commission will use the authority as the studies are developed; " Local streets and roads expenditures are related to the timing of Measure A sales tax revenues as previously explained. These financial statements reflect expenditures made to the local jurisdictions related to collections through January 2015; " Regional arterial expenditures primarily represent expenditures for the highways and regional arterial program administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). CVAG requests reimbursements from the Commission based on available funds and sufficient budget authority; " Debt service principal payments are made annually on June 1, while interest payments are made semi-annually on December 1 and June 1, except for the 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (variable rate) as those interest payments are monthly; " Capital outlay expenditures are under budget due to unused budget authority for station security improvements and Commission network, hardware, and software improvements. Staff anticipates using more budget authority by the fourth quarter; and " Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan proceeds relate to the Commission entering into a loan agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation for a $421,054,409 TIFIA loan to pay eligible 91 Project costs. The loan is a toll revenue bond (TIFIA Bond) that is subordinate to the 2013 Toll Bonds. Proceeds of the TIFIA Bond may be drawn upon after certain conditions have been met. During the third quarter, the Commission did not draw upon the TIFIA Bond proceeds, but anticipates a draw in the fourth quarter. Attachments: 1) Quarterly Financial Statements  March 2015 2) Quarterly Project Status  March 2015 Agenda Item 8A 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2015 ATTACHMENT 1 FY 2014/15 3RD QUARTER REMAINING PERCENT BUDGET ACTUAL BALANCE UTILIZATION Revenues Sales tax $ 261,444,700 $ 145,143,259 $ (116,301,441) 56% Federal reimbursements 83,351,400 21,392,658 (61,958,742) 26% State reimbursements 92,503,000 17,765,373 (74,737,627) 19% Local reimbursements 6,211,000 388,846 (5,822,154) 6% Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 12,154,600 10,927,342 (1,227,258) 90% Other revenues 575,000 288,238 (286,762) 50% Investment income 2,450,900 4,084,165 1,633,265 167% Total revenues 458,690,600 199,989,881 (258,700,719) 44% Expenditures Salaries and benefits 8,280,300 5,786,924 2,493,376 70% Professional and support Professional services 15,821,100 6,834,914 8,986,186 43% Support costs 5,872,400 3,099,023 2,773,377 53% Total Professional and support costs 21,693,500 9,933,937 11,759,563 46% Projects and operations Program operations - general Engineering Construction Design Build Right of way/land Operating and capital disbursements Special studies Local streets and roads Regional arterials Total projects and operations 21,754,200 17,909,600 242,330,180 255,303,500 186,950,400 139,744,289 1,070,000 49,882,000 30,400,000 945,344,169 7,842,266 13,911,934 36% 5,766,688 12,142,912 32% 78,159,043 164,171,137 32% 121,388,040 133,915,460 48% 39,186,738 147,763,662 21% 71,921,250 67,823,039 51% 60,318 1,009,682 6% 27,545,808 22,336,192 55% 12,966,428 17,433,572 43% 364,836,579 580,507,590 39% Debt service Principal 7,400,000 7,400,000 N/A Interest 47,296,200 24,266,686 23,029,514 51% Total debt service 54,696,200 24,266,686 30,429,514 44% Capital outlay 3,785,000 427,652 3,357,348 11% Total Expenditures 1,033,799,169 405,251,778 628,547,391 39% Excess revenues over(under)expenditures (575,108,569) (205,261,897) 640,690,303 36% Other financing sources/(uses) Operating transfer in 526,661,100 156,491,025 (370,170,075) 30% Operating transfer out (526,661,100) (156,491,025) 370,170,075 30% TIFIA loan proceeds 191,600,000 - (191,600,000) N/A Total financing sources/(uses) 191,600,000 191,600,000 N/A Net change in fund balances (383,508,569) (205,261,897) 832,290,303 54% Fund balance July 1, 2014 986,842,300 1,031,476,421 44,634,121 105% Fund balance March 31,2015 $ 603,333,731 $ 826,214,524 $ 876,924,424 137% 7 GENERAL FUND RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL BY FUND 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS MEASURE A SALES TAX TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FSP/ WESTERN COACHELLA SAFE COUNTY VALLEY PALO LOCAL VERDE TRANSPORTATION VALLEY FUND TRANSPORTATION STATE TRANSIT UNIFORM COACHELLA COMMERCIAL SALES TAX TOLL REVENUE COMBINED ASSISTANCE MITIGATION FEE VALLEY RAIL PAPER BONDS BONDS DEBT SERVICE TOTAL (TUMF) Revenues Sales tax $ 2.030.000 $ - $ 68.764.950 $ 21.373.223 $ 632.744 $ 46.105.467 $ 6.236.875 $ Federal reimbursements 10,335 - 20,000,114 - - - State reimbursements 175,304 1,982,911 15,607,158 - - Local reimbursements 131,772 25,570 228,413 - - 3,091 - Transportation Uniform Mitiaation Fee - - (47.4571 - - - - Other revenues 9.222 438 278.578 - - - - Investment income 18.112 12.271 477.199 61.980 - 148.954 120.478 Total revenues 2.374.745 2.021.190 105.308.955 21.435.203 632.744- 46.257.512 6.357.353 $ - $ - $ - $ 145.143.259 - - - - - 1,382,209 21,392,658 17,765,373 - - - - - - 388,846 10.974.799 - - - - - 10.927.342 - - - - - - 288,238 123.578 7.396 1.318.069 536.338 122.760 1.137.030 4.084.165 11.098.377 7.396 1.318.069 536.338 122.760 2.519.239 199,989,881 Expenditures Salaries and benefits 3.559.857 67.549 1.942.212 1.052 - 186.306 29.948 5.786.924 Professional and support Professional services 1.063.209 405.882 4.773.077 - 105.315 487.431 6.834.914 Support costs 2.422.496 242.824 427.455 - - - - 667 5.581 - - - - 3,099,023 Total Professional and support costs 3.485.705 648.706 5.200.532 105.982 493.012 9.933.937 Proiects and operations Proaram operations - aeneral Enaineerina Construction Desian Build Riaht of way/land Opera . and capital disbursements Special studies Local streets and roads Reaional arterials Total projects and operations 1.109.233 1.844.210 4.616.023 12.711 - 2.508.992 - - - 72.472.501 - - - - 121.388.040 - - - 37.408.044 - - 10.381.350 - 4.323.477 4.384.500 - - 60.318 - - 19.432.43- 7.480.628 632.744 12.966.428 - 51.302.933 1.528.990- 260.089 3.257.696 5.686.542 1.778.694 7,842,266 5.766.688 78,159,043 121.388.040 39,186,738 71.921.250 60,318 27.545.808 12,966,428 11.490.583 1.844.210 262.209.831 24.844.267 632.744 51.302.933 1.528.990 10.983.021 - - 364.836.579 Debt service Principal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Interest 24.266.686- 24.266.686 Cast of issuance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Payment to escrow aaent - - Total debt service - - - - - - - - - - - - 24.266.686 24,266,686 Capital outlay 319.878 - 107.774 - - - - - - - - - - 427,652 Total Expenditures 18.856.023 2.560.465 269.460.349 24.845.319 632.744 51.302.933 1.528.990 11.275.309 522.960 - - - 24.266.686 405.251.778 Excess revenues over (under) expenditures (16.481.2781 (539.275) (164.151.3941 (3.410.116) - (5.045.4211 4.828.363 (176.9321 (515.564) 1.318.069 536.338 122.760 (21.747.447) (205.261.897) Other financina sourcesl(uses) Opera . transfer in Operatina transfer out TIFIA loan proceeds Debt proceeds Bond premium Band discount Total financina sources/(uses) 12.672.693 - 128.332.696 5.493 - - (15.386.7651 - - (13.185.4231 512.730 14.967.413 156.491.025 (5.4931 (122.980.9481 (3.550.1871 (1.382.2091 (156,491,025) 12.672.693 - 112.945.931 5.493 (13.185.4231 512.730 (5.4931 (122.980.948) (3.550.1871 13.585.204 Net chanae in fund balances (3.808.585) (539.2751 (51.205.463) (3.404.623) - (18.230.8441 4.828.363 (176.9321 (2.834) 1.312.576 (122.444.610) (3.427.4271 (8.162.243) (205.261.897) Fund balance July 1. 2014 10.590.109 7.890.918 336.826.290 33.433.491 556 115.877.309 55.502.966 57.318.771 4.134.185 28.409.089 199.471.010 45.709.443 136.312.284 1,031476.421 Fund balance March 31. 2015 $ 6 781 524 $ 7 351 643 $ 285 620 827 $ 30 028 868 $ 556 $ 97 646 465 $ 60 331 329 $ 57 141 839 $ 4 131 351 $ 29 721 665 $ 77 026 400 $ 42 282 016 $ 128 150 041 $ 826,214,524 8 ATTACHMENT 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2015 FY 2014/15 BUDGET Project/Description 3RD QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Status 91 Project (Design -Build) The project will connect with Orange County Transportation Authority's tolled express lanes at the Orange County/Riverside County line and continue approximately eight miles to the Interstate (I)-15/State Route (SR)-91 interchange. The project involves widening pavement on the outside of the existing highway to reposition general purpose lanes and repurposing the existing High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes to accommodate two -tolled express lanes in the median in each direction. The SR-91 CIP also involves constructing one new general purpose lane in each direction from SR-71 to 1-15, ultimately providing two -tolled express lanes and five general purpose lanes in each direction. SR-91 CIP development activities began in September 2007, construction work related to roadway and structures began in July 2014, and the toll lanes are expected to open in January 2017. The total acquisition and construction cost of the SR-91 CIP is estimated at $1.4 billion, including capitalized interest, debt service reserves, and cost of issuance. 1-15 Express Lanes Project The project is currently in the preliminary engineering and environmental phase of work to add up to two -tolled express lanes in each direction from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. The project will use the design -build method of project delivery. Project development activities began in April 2008 and lanes are expected to open to traffic in 2020. The estimated project cost is $425 million. $ 426,435,300 7,113,700 $ 159,025,974 2,578,202 The Design -Build contract is on schedule with actual reported progress of 39 percent as of March 31, 2015. The Commission has acquired and delivered 190 out of 197 Caltrans Parcel Numbers to the Design -Builder. Construction has begun on 15 bridges (of 32) and 22 walls (of 93). 24 utility relocations (of 90) are complete. The substantial completion date of January 2017 is unchanged. The under -run of the FY 2014/15 budget at third quarter can be attributed to three main components: slower ramp -up of major construction than anticipated which resulted in less expenditures for construction; project and construction management, Caltrans support services, and utility relocation costs that have occurred but have yet to be invoiced; and lower than planned right of way (ROW) acquisition and associated goodwill costs. Legitimate anticipated cost under -runs (as opposed to billing delays) that have been identified to date are specialized legal services, other professional services, and labor compliance monitoring. Staff continues to advance the project report and environmental document, which is expected to be completed in FY 2015/16. Various methods of project delivery were analyzed in 2013, and ultimately staff received Commission approval in January 2014 to use the Design -Build method of project delivery and begin planning for the Design -Build phase of work. The project construction management contract and the Traffic & Revenue Study contract were both approved by the Commission in April 2015. The project under -run of the FY 2014/15 budget at third quarter is mainly due to billing delays for both the program manager and preliminary engineering firms, as expenditures only include payments for work performed through January 2015 and February 2015, respectively. Legitimate anticipated cost under -runs (as opposed to billing delays) identified to date are general legal support, special legal support, and financial advisory services. All other budgeted costs are occurring as planned. 9 FY 2014/15 BUDGET Project/Description 3RD QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Status 91/71 Interchange Improvements Project The project team is completing final design for interchange improvements to the 91/71 interchange. Final design began in March 2012. The estimated project cost is $123 million. SR-91 HOV Lanes/Adams Street to 60/91/215 Interchange Construction is on -going along with utility relocation. Construction of the project should be completed in fall of 2015. The estimated project cost is $273 million. 1-215 Corridor Improvements/Scott Road to Nuevo Road The project will add one mixed flow lane in each direction. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and was completed in 2011. Final design began in 2011 and was completed in December 2012; construction began in 2013 and is expected to be completed in 2016. The estimated project cost is $120 million. 5,835,800 8,912,400 42,509,500 718,116 A contract for the final design consultant was awarded at the February 2012 Commission meeting. A notice to proceed with the final design phase was issued in March 2012. Final design was delayed due to the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requirement for a new environmental assessment on potholing on federal property. The ACOE also required preparation of an additional environmental assessment to cover project construction impacts on federal property resulting from the eastbound SR-91 to northbound SR-71 flyover connector. The ROW acquisition began in the third quarter of FY 2014/15. Final design was completed during the third quarter of FY 2014/15. The project under -run of the FY 2014/15 budget at third quarter is due to late billing by the final design firm, as only seven invoices have been received to date for the fiscal year. Additionally, there have been no costs to date for utility agreements and ROW acquisitions. Legitimate anticipated cost under -runs (as opposed to billing delays) identified to date are the Caltrans cooperative agreement and a contract extension with the final design consultant. All other budgeted costs are occurring as planned. 648,149 19,290,545 Construction began in April 2012 and is managed by Caltrans. Caltrans completed design work and expenditures remain within the budget authority. The majority of utility relocation work is complete and construction work is focused on the 14th Street interchange. Staff anticipates that remaining budget authority will not be needed. The notice to proceed for construction was issued in December 2012 and construction started in January 2013; construction work continues to be on schedule. The under -run of the FY 2014/15 budget through the third quarter is related to the lag of construction invoice submittals by contractor. 10 FY 2014/15 BUDGET Project/Description 3RD QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Status Mid County Parkway A recirculated project report and environmental document is under development for a new corridor from 1-215 to SR-79. The environmental phase is anticipated to be completed in FY 2014/15. Construction of this new facility will be completed over many years as funding becomes available; the project cost is estimated at $1.3 to $1.6 billion. Perris Valley Line and other rail projects The project is in the construction phase with the extension of commuter rail services to the city of Perris. The project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to move into project development. Expected completion date is December 2015 for an estimated project cost of $248.3 million. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the San Jacinto Branch Line at Highgrove. 13,893,100 140,981,300 2,426,253 Staff continues to work toward the completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Study (EIS). Major milestones have been met and the project is moving forward. A budget amendment was approved by the Commission in April 2014 to allocate additional funding for the completion of Phase II Final EIR/Supplemental EIS. The agreement was signed in June 2014. In April 2015 the Commission approved the EIR. Submittal of invoices by the consultant continues to lag. 38,177,134 Final design is complete and the FTA awarded the Small Starts Grant Agreement funds. ROW acquisition activities for the station and layover facility at south Perris have been completed. Following the settlement of a lawsuit challenging elements of the California Environmental Quality Act document in July 2013, the construction contract was given full notice to proceed in October 2013 following FTA approval of the Small Starts Grant Agreement. Active construction commenced in January 2014; some construction delays have occurred due to various factors. These delays are not expected to impact the scheduled completion date of December 2015. This list discusses the significant capital projects (i.e., total budgeted costs in excess of $5 million) and related status. Capital project expenditures are generally affected by lags in invoices submitted by contractors and consultants, as well as issues encountered during certain phases of the projects. The capital projects budgets tend to be based on aggressive project schedules. 11 AGENDA ITEM 8B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2015/16 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve Resolution No. 15-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit", for Fiscal Year 2015/16. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Section 7910 of the California Government Code implements Article XIIIB of the California Constitution by requiring each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, its appropriations limit for each fiscal year and to make documentation used to determine the appropriations limit available to the public 15 days prior to adoption of the resolution establishing the appropriations limit. Staff performed the calculations necessary to determine the limit. The resolution and documents supporting the calculation are attached. The Commission chose to use the percentage change in the California per capital personal income and the population change within Riverside County as the factors in determining the appropriations limit. As required, the adoption of the Commission's FY 2015/16 Appropriations Limit was posted in the Press Enterprise. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 15-012 2) California Per Capital Income and Population, Riverside County — California Department of Finance Agenda Item 8B 12 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 15-012 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution places an annual limitation upon appropriations from proceeds of taxes by each local government of the State of California; and WHEREAS, in 1988, pursuant to Article XIIIB, section 4 of the California Constitution, the Riverside County Transportation Commission established its appropriations limit at $75 million for Fiscal Year 1988/89 under Ordinance No. 88-1; and WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the California Government Code implements Article XIIIB of the California Constitution by requiring each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, its appropriations limit for each fiscal year and to make the documentation used in determining the appropriations limit available to the public fifteen days prior to adoption of the resolution establishing the appropriations limit; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Senate Constitutional Amendment No. 1 approved by the voters of the State effective June 6, 1990, beginning with FY 1990/91 and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Commission's Board of Commissioners is required to select either the percentage change in California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll due to the addition of local non- residential construction, and either the population change within the Commission or the population change within Riverside County, as the two factors to be applied in calculating the appropriations limit for each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this Board wishes to select, as factors in determining the Commission's appropriation limit for FY 2015/16 the percentage change in California per capita personal income and also the population change within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, this Commission has documented its calculations of the Commission's appropriations limit for FY 2015/16 and said calculations have been made available to the public at least fifteen days prior to the adoption of this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Riverside County Transportation Commission as follows: 1. For FY 2015/16, the factors selected for calculating the appropriations limit are (a) the percentage change in California per capita personal income, and (b) the population change within the County of Riverside. 13 2. The appropriations limit applicable to this Agency pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for FY 2015/16 are hereby established and determined to be $392,995,203. 3. A copy of the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for FY 2015/16 shall be affixed hereto and shall be available for public inspection. 4. Pursuant to Section 7910 of the California Government Code, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the establishment of the appropriations limit as set forth herein must be commenced within forty-five days of the adoption of this resolution. ADOPTED this 10th day of June, 2015. Daryl R. Busch, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2015/16 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 2014/15 Appropriations Limit $ 373,714,246 2015/16 adjustment: Change in California per capita personal income = 3.82% Change in Population, Riverside County = 1.29% Per Capital Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 3.82 + 100 = 1.0382 100 Population converted to a ratio: 1.29 + 100 = 1.0129 100 Calculation of factor for FY 2015-2016: 1.0382 x 1.0129 = 1.05159278 $373,714,246 x 1.05159278 = $392,995,203 2015/16 Appropriations Limit $ 392,995,203 Source: California per capita income — California Department of Finance Population, Riverside County— California Department of Finance ATTACHMENT 2 Era? �P a. w IIII n a � DEPARTMENT OF OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR May 2015 Dear Fiscal Officer: EDMUND G. BROWN JR. • GOVERNOR STATE CAPITOL ■ ROOM 1 1 45 SACRAMENTO CA ■ 95814-4998 ■ WWW.DOF.LA.GOV Subject: Price and Population Information Appropriations Limit The California Revenue and Taxation Code, section 2227, mandates the Department of Finance (Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2015, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2015-16. Attachment A provides the change in California's per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2015-16 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations. Population Percent Change for Special Districts Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and Taxation Code section 2228 for further information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XI II B, section 9(C), of the State Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. The Code and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website: http://ledinfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml. Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this issue should be referred to their respective county for clarification, or to their legal representation, or to the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits. Population Certification The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2015. Please Note: Prior year's city population estimates may be revised. If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086. MICHAEL COHEN Director By: KEELY M. BOSLER Chief Deputy Director Attachment 16 May 2015 Attachment A A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2015-16 appropriation limit is: Per Capita Personal Income Fiscal Year (FY) Percentage change over prior year 2015-16 3.82 B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2015-16 appropriation limit. 2015-16: Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 3.82 percent Population Change = 0.93 percent Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: Population converted to a ratio: Calculation of factor for FY 2015-16: 3.82 + 100 = 1.0382 100 0.93 + 100 = 1.0093 100 1.0382 x 1.0093 = 1.0479 17 Fiscal Year 2015-16 Attachment B Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions" January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2015 and Total Population, January 1, 2015 County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- City 2014-2015 1-1-14 1-1-15 Riverside Total Population 1-1-2015 Banning 0.61 30,306 30,491 30,491 Beaumont 3.99 40,853 42,481 42,481 Blythe 0.52 13,522 13,592 18,909 Calimesa 1.56 8,225 8,353 8,353 Canyon Lake 0.78 10,817 10,901 10,901 Cathedral City 0.64 52,519 52,854 52,903 Coachella 0.72 43,601 43,917 43,917 Corona 0.74 159,109 160,287 160,287 Desert Hot Springs 0.53 27,986 28,134 28,134 Eastvale 2.51 59,151 60,633 60,633 Hemet 0.90 81,520 82,253 82,253 Indian Wells 1.19 5,133 5,194 5,194 Indio 2.22 82,375 84,201 84,201 Jurupa Valley 1.17 97,738 98,885 98,885 Lake Elsinore 3.07 56,543 58,281 58,426 La Quinta 1.72 39,023 39,694 39,694 Menifee 2.03 83,686 85,385 85,385 Moreno Valley 0.71 199,257 200,670 200,670 Murrieta 0.83 106,393 107,279 107,279 Norco 0.53 23,295 23,418 25,891 Palm Desert 1.25 50,424 51,053 51,053 Palm Springs 1.03 46,135 46,611 46,611 Perris 1.17 72,063 72,908 72,908 Rancho Mirage 0.85 17,739 17,889 17,889 Riverside 0.98 314,162 317,248 317,307 San Jacinto 0.79 45,537 45,895 45,895 Temecula 2.51 106,256 108,920 108,920 Wildomar 1.34 33,696 34,148 34,148 Unincorporated 1.29 363,736 368,441 368,823 County Total 1.29 2,270,800 2,300,016 2,308,441 'Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes. 18 Fiscal Year 2015-16 Attachment C Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions* January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2015 County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions 2014-15 1-1-14 1-1-15 Napa Incorporated 0.97 111,409 112,493 County Total 0.94 136,889 138,177 Nevada Incorporated 0.95 32,025 32,330 County Total 0.39 97,728 98,108 Orange Incorporated County Total Placer Incorporated County Total 1.03 2,991,848 3,022,775 1.08 3,113,306 3,146,789 0.91 254,592 256,906 0.76 366,678 369,454 Plumas Incorporated County Total Riverside Incorporated County Total -0.88 2,038 2,020 -0.62 19,682 19,560 1.29 1,907,064 1,931,575 1.29 2,270,800 2,300,016 Sacramento Incorporated County Total San Benito Incorporated County Total San Bernardino Incorporated County Total 1.13 882,483 892,427 1.04 1,450,615 1,465,740 1.01 38,844 39,235 0.75 57,909 58,344 1.16 1,762,969 1,783,437 1.09 2,051,252 2,073,538 *Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes. 19 AGENDA ITEM 8C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Finance Manager/Controller THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Sales Tax Analysis STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4 2014 (Q4 2014). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its December 2007 meeting, the Commission awarded an agreement with MuniServices, LLC (MuniServices) for quarterly sales tax reporting services plus additional fees contingent on additional sales tax revenue generated from the transactions and use tax (sales tax) audit services. As part of the recurring contracts process, the Commission approved a five-year extension through June 30, 2018. The services performed under this agreement pertain to only the Measure A sales tax revenues. Since the commencement of these services, MuniServices submitted an audit update, which reported findings generated and submitted to the State Board of Equalization (SBOE) for review and determination of errors in sales tax reporting related to 340 businesses. Through Q3 2014, the SBOE approved corrections for 247 of these accounts for a total sales tax revenue recovery of $4,921,290. Updated amounts for Q4 2014 will be provided once received from MuniServices. If the SBOE concurs with the error(s) for the remaining claims, the Commission will receive additional revenues; however, the magnitude of the value of the remaining findings was not available. It is important to note that while the recoveries of additional revenues will be tangible, it will not be sufficient to alter the overall trend of sales tax revenues. Additionally, MuniServices provided the Commission with the quarterly sales tax summary report for Q4 2014. Most of the Q4 2014 Measure A sales tax revenues were received by the Commission in the first quarter of calendar year 2015, during January through March 2015, due to a lag in the sales tax calendar. The summary section of the Q4 2014 report is attached and includes an overview of California's economic outlook, local results, historical cash collections analysis by quarter, summary of the top 25 sales/use tax contributors, historical sales tax amounts, annual sales tax by business category, five-year economic trend for significant business category (general retail), and final results. Agenda Item 8C 20 Taxable transactions for the top 25 tax contributors in Riverside County generated 25.3 percent of taxable sales for the year ended Q4 2014, slightly higher than the 23 percent for the year ended Q4 2013. The top 100 tax contributors generated 38 percent of the taxable sales tax for the year ended Q4 2014, compared to the 37 percent for the year ended Q4 2013. In the Economic Category Analysis below, all six categories experienced new highs in the Q4 2014 benchmark year compared to the prior eight benchmark year quarters. Construction and food products had the largest increases at 7.1 and 6.2 percent, respectively. The construction increase is a result of improved home building but at a slow and somewhat uneven pace. The food products increase is a result in the continued steady growth in restaurant prices with no decline in restaurant use. The other economic segments had increases ranging from 4.1 percent to 5.9 percent. of Total /%Change RCTC California Riverside Countywide ECONOMIC San Bernardino Countywide CATEGORY ANALYSIS Inland Empire S.F. Bay Area Sacramento Valley Central Valley South Coast North Coast Central Coast General Retail 28.4/4.9 28.3/2.2 28.1/3.4 25.4/3.8 26.8/3.6 27.3/1.7 28.1/0.7 30.4/3.5 28.8/2.1 28.0/0.1 31.8/0.5 Food Products 16.6 / 6.2 19.7/5.8 18.9/6.2 14.9/6.3 16.9/6.3 21.0/6.6 16.6/4.4 15.9/3.7 20.6/5.8 18.5/3.1 30.6/0.8 Transportation 26.6 / 4.1 24.9/3.3 28.1/6.2 29.4/5.2 28.8/5.7 21.9/2.6 28.8/3.5 26.9/3.5 24.5/3.0 31.1/1.0 21.9/3.6 Construction 12.0 / 7.1 9.1/5.9 13.4/6.3 8.6/5.3 11.0/5.9 9.1/4.6 10.8/3.7 11.4/6.9 7.9/6.9 12.4/-0.1 9.2/4.1 Business to Business 14.4 / 5.4 17.0/4.8 10.6/1.8 20.4/4.4 15.6/3.5 19.7/6.3 13.9/2.1 14.2/4.1 17.1/4.8 9.1/5.5 5.5/3.8 Miscellaneous 2.0 / 5.9 1.1/-1.0 0.9/7.5 1.2/-0.7 1.0/2.6 1.1/0.5 1.7/-1.4 1.2/1.5 1.0/-2.9 0.9/-4.9 1.0/-9.2 Total 100.0 / 5.3 100.0/3.9 100.0/4.9 100.0/4.8 100.0/4.9 100.0/4.0 100.0/2.6 100.0/4.0 100.0/3.8 100.0/1.3 100.0/1.6 For 7 of the top 10 segments (auto sales -new, department stores, restaurants, building materials -wholesale, miscellaneous retail, apparel stores, and building materials -retail) during the past eight quarters, sales tax receipts reached a new high point. These 7 segments represent 56 percent of the total sales tax receipts. Service stations, one of the top 10 segments representing 10.3 percent to the total sales tax receipts, decreased to a new low point in the past two-year period during Q4 2014 due to lower gas prices. Food markets had a slight decrease from the previous Q3 2014 high point, and light industry remained relatively unchanged from the previous Q3 2014. The top 10 segments represent 75.6 percent of the total sales tax receipts. For the other segments representing 24.4 percent of the total sales tax receipts, the segments representing 17.6 percent of the total sales tax receipts reached new high points in the past two years during Q4 2014. In the Economic Segment Analysis below, department stores, auto sales -new, and restaurants represent the three largest segments for Riverside County, or 32.7 percent of total sales taxes. This is the ninth consecutive quarter since Q3 2008 that department stores and auto sales -new have been in the top three economic segments. Growth seen in previous quarters for the service stations segment has been declining slowly from the high in the last three years due to lower gas prices, and this segment reached a new low point in Q4 2014. Restaurants replaced service stations in the top three economic segments. Agenda Item 8C 21 ECONOMIC SEGMENT ANALYSIS %of Total /%Change RCTC California Riverside Countywide San Bernardino Countywide Inland Empire S.F. Bay Area Sacramento Valley Central Valley South Coast North Coast Central Coast Largest Segment Department Stores Restaurants Restaurants Service Stations Service Stations Restaurants Auto Sales- New Department Stores Restaurants Service Stations Restaurants %of Total /%Change 12.0 / 1.7 13.7/6.9 11.7/7.8 12.2/0.6 11.7/0.3 14.7/7.4 12.1/7.1 13.6/1.4 14.8/6.7 13.6/-1.0 21.9/4.9 2nd Largest Segment Auto Sales- New Auto Sales- New Auto Sales- New Department Stores Department Stores Auto Sales- New Department Stores Service Stations Auto Sales- New Department Stores Misc. Retail %of Total /%Change 10.7 / 9.2 10.6/8.1 11.7/11.1 10.6/3.6 11.0/1.5 10.2/6.7 11.3/0.4 10.8/-2.7 10.8/8.2 11.2/-0.7 9.8/2.6 3rd Largest Segment Restaurants Department Stores Department Stores Restaurants Restaurants Department Stores Restaurants Auto Sales- New Department Stores Auto Sales- New Service Stations %of Total /%Change 10.0 / 7.7 9.9/0.5 11.3/-0.4 9.8/7.5 10.7/7.7 8.3/0.5 10.7/5.3 10.2/11.2 9.6/0.1 10.3/4.8 9.7/2.5 During the review of the Q4 2014 detailed report with MuniServices, information regarding sales tax comparison by city and change by economic segment (two highest gains and two highest losses) from Q4 2013 to Q4 2014 was provided. Staff continues to monitor monthly sales tax receipts and other available economic data to determine the need for any adjustment to the revenue projections. Staff will utilize the forecast scenarios included with the complete report and recent trends in assessing such projections. Attachments: 1) Sales Tax Digest Summary Q4 2014 2) Quarterly Sales Tax Change Comparison by City for Q4 2013 to Q4 2014 Agenda Item 8C 22 ATTACHMENT 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Digest Summary Collections through March 2015 Sales through December 2014 (2014Q4) CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMIC OUTLOOK California sales tax receipts increased by 4.0% over the same quarter from the previous year, with Northern California reporting a 3.0% increase compared to 4.7% for Southern California. Receipts for the Riverside County Transportation Commission changed by 4.3% over the same periods. The UCLA Anderson Forecast predicts steady gains in employment through 2017. The total number of jobs in California is expected to grow by 2.2% in 2015, 2.3% in 2016 and 1.6% in 2017. California's January unemployment rate is 6.9%, the lowest since May 2008. By sometime in 2017, it is expected to match the national rate at around 5.1 %. Low gasoline prices were short-lived. After falling to $ 1.99 per gallon, prices steadied at around $ 3.27 per gallon by March. Despite the rebound in pricing, the statewide California 2015Q1 Average Retail Price per gallon of Regular Gasoline was still 23% below the 2014Q1 price. California prices averaged $3.74 per gallon for 2014 and are still expected to average only $2.75 per gallon for 2015, 18% below the March 26th price. This indicates that prices are likely to remain fairly stable and will probably be slightly less by the end of 2015. LOCAL RESULTS Net Cash Receipts Analysis Local Collections Share of County Pool 0.0% Share of State Pool 0.0% SBE Net Collections Less: Amount Due County 0.0% Less: Cost of Administration Net 4Q2014 Receipts Net 4Q2013 Receipts Actual Percentage Change $43,444,703 0 0 43,444,703 .00 (479,630) 42,965,073 41,196,481 4.3% Business Activity Performance Analysis Local Collections Less: Payments for Prior Periods Preliminary 4Q2014 Collections Projected 4Q2014 Late Payments Projected 4Q2014 Final Results Actual 4Q2013 Results Projected Percentage Change $43,444,703 (1,707,676) 41,737,027 7,933,590 49,670,617 40,912,902 21.4% www.MuniServices.com (8l, 800-8181 Page 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission HISTORICAL CASH COLLECTIONS ANALYSIS BY QUARTER $ 50,000 $45,000 $40,000 $ 3 5,000 0 a $30,000 ces c $25,000 a) a) F4 $20,000 m z $15,000 $10,000 $ 5,000 $O [In Thousands of Dollars] 30_2012 4Q2012 10_2013 2Q2013 3Q2013 4Q2013 1Q2014 2Q2014 3Q2014 4Q.2014 Net Receipts fSROEAdmin Fees Due TOP 25 SALES/USE TAX CONTRIBUTORS The following list identifies Riverside County contributors. The list is in alphabetical order and The Top 25 Sales/Use Tax contributors generate total sales and use tax revenue. ALBERSTON'S FOOD CENTERS AMAZON.COM BEST BUY STORES CARMAX THE AUTO SUPERSTORE CHEVRON SERVICE STATIONS CIRCLE K FOOD STORES COSTCO WHOLESALE DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES DESERT SUNLIGHT HOME DEPOT JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES LOWE'S HOME CENTERS Transportation Commission's Top 25 Sales/Use Tax represents sales from January 2014 to December 2014. 25.3% of Riverside County Transportation Commission's MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORE RALPH'S GROCERY ROSS STORES SAM'S CLUB STATER BROS MARKETS TARGET STORES TESORO SERVICE STATIONS VERIZON WIRELESS VONS SERVICE STATIONS WAL MART STORES WALGREEN'S DRUG STORES WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION www.MuniServices.com (8 2) 800-8181 Page 2 Riverside County Transportation Commission HISTORICAL SALES TAX AMOUNTS The following chart shows the sales tax level from sales through December 2014, the highs, and the lows for each segment over the last two years. (In Thousands of $) $20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $ 8,000 $ 6,000 $4,00CY $2,000 $0 4z`5 . �S `, tia.` ,t' jL' ,cm...6eio;s a�� 5�a ,oc�e� ¢.te5 N.` `af- �.g.F'b -\2e & �Z a �aaQ- `�a`�� o� ���`N,Ja amtacQ�Pe9 y�O y ANNUAL SALES TAX BY BUSINESS CATEGORY 4Q2014 High Low 4Q2014 3Q2014 202014 1Q2014 4Q2013 3Q2013 202013 1Q2013 402012 3Q2012 (In Thousands of $) $0 $20 000 $40 000 $60,000 $80 000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000 ■ General Retail ■ Food Products Transportation ■ Construction ■ Business To Business ■ Miscellaneous www.MuniServices.com (8 20) 800-8181 Page 3 Riverside County Transportation Commission FIVE-YEAR ECONOMIC TREND: General Retail (In Thousands of $) $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $ 8,000 FINAL RESULTS: July -September 2014 Sales Local Net Cash Collections Less: Pool Amounts Less: Prior Quarter Payments Add: Late Payments Local Net Economic Collections after Adjustments Percent Change from April -June 2013 Sales MUNISERVICES' ON -GOING AUDIT RESULTS This Quarter $254,016 Total to Date $4,921,290 $39,136,144 ($-479,630) ($2,000,825) $1,242,543 $38,857,492 UP BY 5.6% www.MuniServices.com (8 20) 800-8181 Page 4 INLAND EMPIRE: Quarterly Comparison of 2013Q4 and 2014Q4 ( October thru December Sales ) ATTACHMENT 2 General Retail Transportation Constructio m Oct - Dec 2014 (2014Q4) Oct - Dec 2013 (2013Q4) % Chg Gain Gain Decline Decline RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RCTC RIVERSIDE COUNTY BANNING BEAUMONT BLYTHE CALIMESA CANYON LAKE CATHEDRAL CITY COACHELLA CORONA DESERT HOT SPRINGS EASTVALE HEMET INDIAN WELLS INDIO JURUPA VALLEY LA QUINTA LAKE ELSINORE MENIFEE MORENO VALLEY MURRIETA NORCO PALM DESERT PALM SPRINGS PERRIS RANCHO MIRAGE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAN JACINTO TEMECULA WILDOMAR I 4.9% 2.9%I 1.2%I 12.2%I 5.8%I 7.0%I 42,819,057 40,912,557 4.7%IAuto Sales - New BIdg.Matls-Whsle Service Stations Food Markets - 23.6 % 6.2 % -3.3 % 35.2% - 55.5% -2.2 % 6.2 % 1.2% 1.6% -2.9 % -1.0% -4.9% 14.6% -36.6 % -6.2 % 3.4% 5.1% 4.8 % 1.3 % 24.2 % 2.4% 0.5 % 7.4% -4.7 % 5.0% 17.0% 5.3% 5.0% 2.3 % 5.6% 9.6% -1.2% 6.9% 5.8% 0.1% 6.8% 3.1% 7.0% 9.6% 0.6% 1.3 % 3.9% -0.6% 3.4% 8.8% 13.1% 6.1% 3.2% 1.7% 4.0% 5.8% 0.4% 11.0% -1.2% -3.7% 3.1% 5.0% 21.5% 0.8 % 2.4% -11.1% -12.5 % -24.7 % 7.8% -1.0% 6.1% -13.0% -12.1 % -7.0% -88.5 % 8.5 % -14.5 % 4.6% 8.4% -1.7% 5.3% 7.3 % 2.1% -4.0% -8.0% -8.3 % -15.2 % 6.8% -23.7 % -1.6% 16.3 % 5.3% 2.9% 0.6% -5.3% -35.2% -27.2% -0.1% -12.2% -5.2% 0.3% 12.5 % 13.2% -46.6% 8.5 % 5.9% 9.4% 8.0% 44.4% 5.8% 12.3% -14.8% 10.8% 8.7% 9.4% -9.0% 14.5% 18.3% -52.6% 11.2% 36.5% 20.0% -6.9 % 11.6% -8.9 % 69.2 % 15.0% -11.7 % 1.6% -66.1 % 2.3 % 22.1% -77.4% -14.8 % 4.1% -5.9 % 7.5 % 17.7 % 18.6% 5.5 % 1.8 % 7.6% 3.0% 3.5 % 4.6% 1.0% 12.0% -15.1 % 7.5 % 14.2 % 35.1% 0.8% 32.7% -49.1% -36.0% -15.4% 27.9% -4.5% 14.2% 45.2% -31.0% -31.8% -19.1% -58.4% -18.1% -14.4% 31.6% -15.3% 13.9% -22.3% 2.8% -6.3 % 46.1% 5.0% -1.4% -7.0% 2.1% 5.0% -22.5% 436,425 442,474 -1.4% 978,675 946,135 3.4% 390,428 407,718 -4.2% 156,708 158,338 -1.0% 38,323 48,779 -21.4% 1,938,051 1,841,276 5.3% 790,653 787,490 0.4% 8,334,846 8,276,406 0.7% 318,866 340,684 -6.4% 1,571,929 1,545,534 1.7% 2,305,160 2,327,313 -1.0% 223,127 233,850 -4.6% 2,253,854 2,110,150 6.8% 1,979,089 2,272,073 -12.9% 1,991,178 2,014,936 -1.2% 1,950,768 1,836,037 6.2% 1,358,470 1,247,811 8.9% 3,845,182 3,624,304 6.1% 3,233,144 3,093,338 4.5% 1,301,017 1,241,689 4.8% 4,610,142 4,469,954 3.1% 2,663,539 2,630,875 1.2% 2,010,816 1,916,962 4.9% 1,120,126 1,139,286 -1.7% 13,232,404 12,611,084 4.9% 7,764,130 7,271,693 6.8% 540,262 545,650 -1.0% 7,515,103 6,922,938 8.6% 338,887 305,071 11.1% Auto Sales - New Misc. Vehicle Sales Heavy Industry Department Stores Miscellaneous Retail Auto Sales - New Food Markets Office Equipment Restaurants BIdg.Matls-Whsle Miscellaneous Retail Business Services Department Stores Miscellaneous Retail Restaurants Auto Sales - New BIdg.Matls-Retail Auto Sales - New Misc. Vehicle Sales Miscellaneous Retail Apparel Stores Restaurants Miscellaneous Other Restaurants Auto Sales - New Apparel Stores Restaurants Auto Sales - New Food Markets Restaurants Department Stores Auto Parts/Repair Restaurants Restaurants Service Stations Auto Sales - Used Auto Sales - New Food Markets Electronic Equipment BIdg.Matls-Retail Food Markets Auto Sales - New Heavy Industry Auto Parts/Repair Food Markets Restaurants Restaurants Leasing BIdg.Matls-Whsle BIdg.Matls-Retail BIdg.Matls-Retail BIdg.Matls-Whsle Furniture/Appliance Restaurants BIdg.Matls-Whsle Department Stores Miscellaneous Retail Service Stations Department Stores Service Stations Service Stations Service Stations Department Stores Food Markets Service Stations BIdg.Matls-Whsle Service Stations Miscellaneous Retail Auto Sales - New Light Industry Heavy Industry Department Stores Department Stores Service Stations Service Stations Service Stations Energy Sales BIdg.Matls-Retail Department Stores Service Stations Service Stations Auto Sales - New Food Processing Eqp Service Stations BIdg.Matls-Whsle Service Stations Health & Government Service Stations Office Equipment Auto Sales - New Heavy Industry Service Stations BIdg.Matls-Whsle BIdg.Matls-Whsle Light Industry Office Equipment Light Industry Service Stations Misc. Vehicle Sales Miscellaneous Retail Service Stations Food Markets Office Equipment Apparel Stores BIdg.Matls-Whsle Service Stations Service Stations Service Stations Department Stores Food Markets Miscellaneous Retail Light Industry Food Markets Service Stations Food Markets Electronic Equipment Non -Confidential 27 MuniServices AGENDA ITEM 8D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Marla Dye, Procurement Analyst Matt Wallace, Procurement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2015/16 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the recurring contracts for Fiscal Year 2015/16; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As in previous years, the Commission annually evaluates existing contracts for professional services due to expire within the next fiscal year. These contracts may be placed on the calendar for a new procurement solicitation, allowed to expire since they are no longer required, or included in the annual recurring contracts list that is subject to Commission approval. Most contracts for professional services are subject to a competitive process. This year's list of recurring contracts includes consultants that are providing unique or specialized services and working closely with staff on long-term projects. Staff desires to retain a limited number of consultants on the recurring contracts list due to the consultant's historical knowledge, unique experience, and understanding of the Commission and specific Commission projects. Under limited circumstances, staff believes it is more efficient and cost effective to retain the consultants on the recurring contracts list rather than rebidding the services at this time. Approval of the recurring contracts list will allow the Commission to continue work on existing projects without interruptions and maintain consistency. The list of proposed recurring contracts for FY 2015/16, followed by a summary for each consultant supporting its inclusion on the recurring contracts list is as follows: Agenda Item 8D 28 Schedule of Recurring Contracts for FY 2015/16 Consultant Name Description of Services Budget FY 14/15 Budget FY 15/16 Dollar Change FY 15 to FY 16 AMMA Transit Planning (AMMA) Consultant support for administration of Specialized Transit Program under Measure A and federal programs $120,000 $120,000 $0 Bechtel Infrastructure (Bechtel) Capital project program management services 8,200,000 8,190,000 ($10,000) Best Best & Krieger LLP (BB&K) General legal services 5,431,900 4,678,400 ($753,500) BLX Group (BLX) Arbitrage rebate compliance services 15,000 15,000 $0 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. (Epic) Support services for property management of Commission -owned properties and related contracts 639,500 539,000 ($100,500) Fieldman Rolapp & Associates (Fieldman) Financial advisory services 250,000 300,000 $50,000 GCAP Services, Inc. (GCAP) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) support services 50,000 75,000 $25,000 Total $14,706,400 $13,917,400 ($789,000) Consultant Name Description of Serviced Budget FY 14/15 Budget FY 15/16 5-Year Contract Ray Gorski Consultant support for air quality technical assessments of Commission's projects that are funded with CMAQ or other fund sources that require an air quality assessment. $25,000 $25,000 $ 125,000 Total $25,000 $25,000 $ 125,000 1This is a contract with a consultant providing specialized services on long-term projects at a fixed rate. The contract does not need to be negotiated annually as service level and pricing are not expected to change during the period of performance. Staff desires to enter into a five-year agreement with each of these consultants for the aggregate amount shown in the Budget FY 2015/16 area above. AMMA Transit Planning In February 2007, AMMA was selected under a competitive procurement process to provide consulting services for the development and implementation of the Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan), as well as the required updates of the Coordinated Plan. AMMA also guides staff regarding the grant application process for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Elderly and Disabled Specialized Transit program, the Commission's Annual Countywide Performance Report, the Commission's Title VI program, and the Citizens Advisory Committee processes. Additionally, AMMA advises staff regarding the management of operator reporting for the current specialized transit call for Agenda Item 8D 29 projects and assists in the development of the application and eligibility guidelines for future specialized transit call for projects. AMMA also assists in managing unmet transit needs and community input meetings. Bechtel Infrastructure The Bechtel contract for FY 2015/16 reflects a minimal decrease from last year. Several of the Commission's larger projects, including the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project), Perris Valley Line (PVL), and widening projects on the Interstate 215 are in the more labor-intensive design -build or construction phases, and Bechtel currently is staffed to support this work. Bechtel is continuing program management and construction management activities of highway and rail projects for the 2009 Measure A program, as well as the wrap up of delivery for the remaining projects for the 1989 Measure A program. In FY 2015/16, it is planned to have Bechtel provide construction management for a few smaller rail station projects, which will lower costs of those projects. Bechtel possesses the knowledge and background history of the Commission's capital projects, which is necessary to deliver the Commission's Measure A projects. The flexibility of obtaining additional support from Bechtel as needed for specific project requirements is also important and avoids the need to increase Commission staff. Best Best & Krieger LLP The FY 2015/16 contract for BB&K reflects a net decrease in legal costs compared to the amended FY 2014/15 contract, primarily related to the conclusion of litigation offset by the continued need for specialized legal services for certain projects. A high level of general legal services is generally required from BB&K for highway and rail capital project activities, especially right of way, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) projects. BB&K also provides support related to procurements and contract development. The Commission engaged other legal firms for specific matters involving potential conflicts of interest, as well as other specialized legal services. BLX Group In 2007, the Commission engaged BLX to perform arbitrage rebate compliance services for sales tax revenue debt issued under the 1989 Measure A and 2009 Measure A, as required by the Internal Revenue Service and the tax certificates executed for each debt issue. This includes commercial paper notes and sales tax revenue bonds. In order to ensure the Commission is complying with the complex arbitrage rebate regulations, it elected to have the required calculations performed more frequently than the minimum reporting requirements during the life of each debt issue. Accordingly, BLX maintains historical information and calculations that are considered in subsequent arbitrage rebate calculations. Therefore, staff determined it would be more efficient and cost effective to extend the contract for an additional one-year period through June 30, 2016. Furthermore, BLX is affiliated with Orrick, which results in additional efficiencies related to immediate access to bond documents and key staff. Agenda Item 8D 30 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Due to its accumulated knowledge and development of various property management projects, resources, and databases associated with the multitude of Commission -owned properties, including but not limited to those along the San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL), staff determined Epic can most efficiently and cost effectively provides property management services. The scope of services for FY 2015/16 includes updating private use and utility licenses to current Commission terms; coordinating and assisting with activities related to the issuance of new licenses; maintaining and updating a database to capture all of the Commission -owned properties and contract information; maintaining and updating mapping of all Commission - owned properties and contracts; following up on delinquent rent payments; monitoring contractor activities on Commission -owned properties to ensure compliance with right of entries; tracking insurance certifications; assisting with coordinating removal of debris and illegal occupants; and resolving complex title issues. Epic resolved numerous property management related tasks; therefore, the estimated fees decreased sixteen percent from the prior year. Fieldman Rolapp & Associates Fieldman was selected as the Commission's financial advisor in late 2003, following a procurement process, and provided financial advisory services on general finance matters and specific financing transactions related to the 2009 Measure A program. Fieldman played a significant role in the 91 Project financing activities that achieved financial close in early July 2013. Fieldman continues to provide additional support related to the annual update of the financial model and Annual Financial Plan required by the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loan agreement, as well as other implementation matters related to the 91 Project financing. Based on financing activities related to the 1-15 Express Lanes project, as well as Fieldman's knowledge and understanding of the Commission, staff determined it would be more efficient and cost-effective for continuity purposes to retain Fieldman. The increase in estimated fees is related to the 1-15 Express Lanes financing activities, which commenced in late FY 2014/15. GCAP Services, Inc. GCAP provides DBE program consulting and compliance services, including goal calculations, program development, and outreach to small and disadvantaged businesses. Since October 2011, GCAP has been assisting the Commission in the DBE calculation of contract goals and the development of its Small Business Enterprise (SBE) program to meet state and federal requirements. GCAP's level of effort is expected to increase in FY 2015/16 due to essential outreach services for the 1-15 Express Lanes project, the Commission's FTA triennial DBE goal calculation, and the continued development and implementation of the Commission's SBE program. Agenda Item 8D 31 Specialized Services on Long -Term Projects for Multiple Year Contracts Ray Gorski Ray Gorski provides air quality technical assessments, on an as needed basis, for the Commission's Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality and/or other funded projects that require air quality assessments. Mr. Gorski is a known expert in the field of emissions models that are developed by the Environmental Protection Agency and California Air Resources Board. Mr. Gorski's air quality assessments/reports have never been questioned or challenged by Ca!trans or Federal Highway Administration, which is a testament to his expert reputation. Mr. Gorski's services are invaluable to the Commission during the call for projects evaluations, as he provides his expertise for calculating the air quality benefits that in turn enables the Commission to make funding recommendations based on the funding criteria. He is extremely responsive to the Commission's timelines and always provides the Commission with thorough reports. Staff recommends extending Mr. Gorski's consultant services for five years, thereby securing the air quality consulting expertise that enhances the Commission's ability to receive the required funding approvals without any issues or delays. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17+ Amount: $13,942,400 $ 100,000 Source of Funds: Measure A, TDA, TUMF, Interest, and Other Reimbursements Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: Various Fiscal Procedures Approved: \IIAI � Date: 05/21/15 Agenda Item 8D 32 AGENDA ITEM 8E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Marla Dye, Procurement Analyst Matt Wallace, Procurement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement with EXIGIS, LLC for Insurance Tracking System STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 15-19-017-00 with EXIGIS, LLC (EXIGIS) for the use of the RiskWorks risk management operating system (RiskWorks) for insurance tracking services for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $73,815, plus a contingency amount of $7,382, for a total amount not to exceed $81,197; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission enters into numerous agreements for a variety of services annually. Prior to award and throughout the agreement term, Commission staff must verify all contracted firms have current insurance which complies with each associated agreement. Accordingly, the Commission and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) decided to issue a joint request for proposals (RFP) seeking an efficient solution to improve insurance tracking to accommodate the volume of insurance certificates received. Each agency will enter into separate agreements with the successful proposer in accordance with the respective approval processes. Procurement Process On November 13, 2014, SANBAG released a joint RFP (15-1001071) for insurance compliance and certificate tracking services. Utilizing SANBAG's PlanetBids site, 129 vendors were notified of the RFP and seven firms downloaded the RFP. SANBAG held a pre -bid conference on November 20, 2014. Clarifications were due on December 4, 2014. Three bids were received prior to the December 18, 2014, deadline from CertFocus; EXIGIS; and Insurance Tracking Agenda Item 8E 33 Services, Inc. Utilizing the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP, all firms were evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of SANBAG, the county of San Bernardino, and Commission staff. The evaluation committee elected to invite all three firms to the interview phase. Interviews were conducted on January 22 at the SANBAG office. As a result of the completion of the evaluation process, the evaluation committee recommends contract award to EXIGIS, as this firm earned the highest total evaluation score. EXIGIS will provide the Commission with RiskWorks system to improve the efficiency and productivity of resources by automating the administration of the insurance certificate tracking process. EXIGIS, through RiskWorks, will administer all insurance -related correspondence to firms awarded agreements by the Commission and execute insurance compliance functions including: 1) Insurance information requests, reminders, notices, and renewal requests; 2) Create and maintain vendor account profiles; 3) Receive and process certificates of insurance and policy endorsements; 4) Perform data extraction of pertinent insurance information; 5) Evaluate compliance of insurance information with contractually mandated minimums; 6) Maintain a searchable and readily accessible archive of insurance records, related documentation and vendor account information. 7) RiskWorks will be used by Commission staff to monitor compliance status, progress, and activity; 8) Access vendor account information; 9) View vendor compliance evaluation(s), certificates of insurance, policy endorsements, and process communications; 10) Review exceptions and respond to terminal compliance deficiencies (i.e. waive, reject, return for further revision, etc.); and 11) Search activity history and account archives. Additionally, staff will use RiskWorks to run template reports, create ad -hoc reports, and export and save data regarding vendor account and compliance information from RiskWorks to spreadsheet applications. Based on the information provided, staff recommends the Commission approve Agreement No. 15-19-017-00 with EXIGIS for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $73,815, plus a contingency amount of $7,382, for a total amount not to exceed $81,197. Upon approval of the agreement with EXIGIS, implementation is scheduled for the beginning of FY 2015/16. Agenda Item 8E 34 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17+ Amount: $22,000 $59,197 Source of Funds: Measure A, Local Transportation Fund, Motorist Assistance, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 001001 65520 00000 0000 101 19 65520 Fiscal Procedures Approved: itkoir Date: 05/20/15 Attachment: Agreement No. 15-19-017-00 Agenda Item 8E 35 Agreement No. 15-19-017-00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR INSURANCE TRACKING SERVICES WITH EXIGIS, LLC 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this _ day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") and EXIGIS, LLC ("Consultant"), a New York limited liability company. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional consulting services required by Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is a professional consultant, experienced in providing insurance tracking services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of Commission. 2.2 Commission desires to engage Consultant to render certain consulting services for the insurance tracking software RiskWorks° Risk Management Operating System®, inclusive of the rm.Compliance® and rm.Reports® Application Modules, and perform annual services in support thereof (together; the "Project") as set forth herein. 3. TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to Commission all labor materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately provide professional consulting services and advice on various issues affecting the decisions of Commission regarding the Project and on other programs and matters affecting Commission, hereinafter referred to as "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. 17336.00000\8752982.2 36 3.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first specified above to June 30, 2018, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The Commission, at its sole discretion, may extend this Agreement for two (2) additional single year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 3.3 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of the Commission, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.4 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, method and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall not be employees of Commission and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.5 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of Commission. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence and experience upon written approval of Commission. In the event that Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to provisions of Section 3.16 of this Agreement. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Larry Hernandez, Partner and Director Fulfillment Services; Jon Folmsbee, Senior Associate, Project Lead; and Vicky Ng, Associate, Relationship Manager. 2 17336.00000\8752982.2 37 3.7 Commission's Representative. Commission hereby designates Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's representative shall have the power to act on behalf of Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction from any person other than Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 3.8 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Larry Hernandez, Partner and Director Fulfillment Services, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his or her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.9 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with Commission staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Commission's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.10 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant shall perform the Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standard generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from Commission, any Services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. 3.11 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its 3 17336.00000\8752982.2 38 officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.12 Insurance. 3.12.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.12.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.12.3 [Reserved] 3.12.4Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: 4 17336.00000\8752982.2 39 (A) General Liability. (0 Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) bodily Injury and property damage; (2) personal Injury/advertising Injury; (3) premises/operations liability; (4) products/completed operations liability; (5) aggregate limits that apply per Project; (6) explosion, collapse and underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) contractual liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) broad form property damage; and (9) independent consultants coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to this Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from the Commission's insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. (0 Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. 5 17336.00000\8752982.2 40 (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. 0) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set forth hereunder. (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by 6 17336.00000\8752982.2 41 another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: 3.12.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.12.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.12.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission 7 17336.00000\8752982.2 42 reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.12.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 3.13 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.14 Fees and Payment. 3.14.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The total compensation shall not exceed [ INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT ] ($[ INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT j) without written approval of Commission's Executive Director ("Total Compensation"). Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.14.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to Commission a monthly statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. Commission shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 17336.00000\8752982.2 3.14.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be 8 43 reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Commission. 3.14.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Commission may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by Commission to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Commission's Executive Director. 3.15 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.16 Termination of Agreement. 3.16.1 Grounds for Termination. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been fully and adequately rendered to Commission through the effective date of the termination, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.16.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Commission may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined below, and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.16.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.17 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: 9 17336.00000\8752982.2 44 CONSULTANT: EXIGIS, LLC. 589 8th Avenue, Floor 8 New York, NY 10018 Attn: Frank J. McMackin IV COMMISSION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. 10 17336.00000\8752982.2 45 The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.18.4Infringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence 11 17336.00000\8752982.2 46 of the use on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.20 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such actions. 3.21 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation, the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse the Commission and its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnity shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. This Section 3.21 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. 3.22 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be supplemented, amended, or modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.23 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 12 17336.00000\8752982.2 47 3.24 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.25 Commission's Right to Employ Other Consultants. The Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.26 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.27 Prohibited Interests and Conflicts. 3.27.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.27.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Commission, during the term of his or her service with Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.27.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.27.4 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission's written consent, prior to accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.28 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related 13 17336.00000\8752982.2 48 to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provi- sions of Commission's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related Commission programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.29 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.30 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certified that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Commission shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.30.1 DIR Registration. Effective March 1, 2015, if the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. If applicable, Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant's sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. 3.31 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or 14 17336.00000\8752982.2 49 trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub -consultant for the employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub -consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant. 3.32 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.33 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.34 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.35 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not 15 17336.00000\8752982.2 50 limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, and the obligations related to receipt of subpoenas or court orders, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.36 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.37 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.38 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.39 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 3.40 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.41 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.42 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.43 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.44 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 17336.00000\8752982.2 [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 16 51 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR INSURANCE TRACKING SERVICES WITH EXIGIS, LLC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY EXIGIS, LLC TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Daryl R. Busch Chairman Frank J. McMackin IV Partner & Director Approved as to Form: Attest: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Its: Secretary General Counsel 17 17336.00000\8752982.2 52 EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES [TO BE INSERTED] EXHIBIT "B" - PROJECT FEES [TO BE INSERTED] 17336.00000\8752982.2 Exhibit-1 53 AGENDA ITEM 8F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Megan Kavand, Accounting Technician Anne Hallberg, Accounting Supervisor Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: For the past few years and as a result of a low interest rate environment, the Commission's quarterly investment reports have reflected investments primarily concentrated in the Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund. Other investments included the state Local Agency Investment Fund and mutual funds. In connection with the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds and toll revenue bonds and the execution of Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project), the Commission anticipated the need to engage an investment manager for the bond proceeds and other required funds. Additionally, the Commission desired to engage an investment manager to provide investment advisory and management services related to the Commission's operating funds. Accordingly, at its May 2013 meeting, the Commission awarded two investment management services agreements to Logan Circle Partners, L.P. (Logan) for 91 Project funds and to Payden & Rygel Investment Management (Payden & Rygel) for Commission operating funds. Logan invested the 91 Project debt proceeds during the first quarter of FY 2013/14 in the Short - Term Actively Managed Program (STAMP). Payden & Rygel was authorized to make specific investments for the Commission's operating funds beginning with the third quarter of FY 2014/15. The quarterly investment report for the third quarter of FY 2014/15 as required by state law and Commission policy reflects the increased investment activities resulting from the 91 Project and available operating cash. The Quarterly Investment Report includes the following information: Agenda Item 8F 54 " Investment Portfolio Report; " STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category; " STAMP Portfolio by Account; " STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account; " STAMP Portfolio Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type and market sector; " STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type and market sector; and " Logan Circle Partners, L.P. Short Duration Third Quarter 2015 Review; " Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio by investment category; " Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio transaction report; " Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Third Quarter 2015 Review; and " County of Riverside Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2015. The Commission's investments were in full compliance with the Commission's investment policy adopted on September 10, 2014, and investments securities permitted under the Indenture for the Commission's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds and the Master Indenture for the Commission's Toll Revenue Bonds. Additionally, the Commission has adequate cash flows for the next six months. Attachments: 1) Investment Portfolio Report 2) STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category 3) STAMP Portfolio by Account 4) STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account 5) STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments 6) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Summary of Investments 7) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of Investments 8) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Summary of Investments 9) STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments 10) STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments 11) Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio by Investment Category 12) Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report 13) Logan Circle Partners, L.P. Short Duration Quarterly Review 14) Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Third Quarter 2015 Review 15) County of Riverside Investment Report Agenda Item 8F 55 ATTACHMENT 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Investment Portfolio Report Period Ended: March 31, 2015 RATING COUPON PAR FAIR VALUE MOODYS/FITCH/S&P RATE VALUE OPERATING FUNDS City National Bank Deposits 5,000,091 A3/BBB+ N/A County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund 387,176,335 Aaa-bf/AAAN1 N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 3,633,793 Not Rated N/A Subtotal Operating Funds 395,810,219 FUNDS HELD IN TRUST County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund: Local Transportation Fund Subtotal Funds Held in Trust 97,698 774 Aaa-bf/AAAN1 N/A 97,698,774 COMMISSION MANAGED PORTFOLIO US Bank Payden & Rygel Operating 50,060,349 See attached report for details First American Govemment Obligation Fund 9,882,886 Aaa-mf/-/AAAm N/A Cost of Issuance Fund BNY Mellon Money Market Subtotal Commission Managed Portfolio 59,943,236 STAMP PORTFOLIO for 91 CIP Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Subtotal STAMP Portfolio TOTAL All Cash and Investments 42,281,849 72,120,949 18,678,609 22,018,740 71,730,237 226,830,384 $ 780,282,613 See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details 400,000,000 J 350,000,000 300,000,000 250,000,000 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 Nature of Investments ■ STAMP Portfolio for 91 CIP Reserve ■ STAMP Portfolio for 91 CIP Project Fund i ■ STAMP Portfolio for 91 CIP Capitalized Interest ■ Commission Managed Portfolio id Trust Funds Operating Funds PURCHASE MATURITY DATE DATE YIELD TO MATURITY N/A 0.46% N/A 0.46% N/A PURCHASE MARKET UNREALIZED COST VALUE Portfolio Investment Type 0.21% Money Market Funds 35.27% Fixed _ Income 0.47% LAIF GAIN (LOSS) 1.27% Mutual Funds 62.78% County Pool/Cash 56 ATTACHMENT 2 Riyasdr lranspor naliA cimarissim STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Account i[ [vmns Security Type Identifier .,. Category Issuer Final Current Face Maturity Trade Date ` Value Nest Call Base Market Original Cost Date Value Base Net Total Unrealized Summarized Gain/Loss. Coupon Yield Credit Rating 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137EACA5 Agency 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 313384FM6 Agency. 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137EADB2 Agency 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 _ 3135GOJA2 , Agencyy 205091001 LC2013. A Capitalized, Interest 313384EV6 Agency. __ 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I -3134G5EK7 A encv 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31395EZP5 Agenoy.CMO - _ 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 38376WA62 Agency CMO 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376G5B2 Agency, CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 38376T5Z1 Agency CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377UN20 Agency .CMO 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 31392FPP6. -_ Agency CMO_ 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376GB33 Agency CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137AEV77 Agency. CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 313921183, _ _Agency CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377RVK8 Agency CMO 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-t interest 3137ASNH3 Agency. CMG _ 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137ASNH3 Agency CMO 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 ,31397QUQ9. Agency, CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377JZ89 Agency CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378BX20 Agency. CM° 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 31392HWL3 Agency CMO 205091001 LC-2013 A_Capitalized Interest 31392F6C6 Agency. CMO - 205091001 LC 013 A Capnali ed Interest 3I392BVM5 Agency CMO 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137A0T24 Agency CMO 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38379C2M7 A ency CMO 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 3136ACGF2 Agency CMO _ ^, 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136A7M18 Agency CMO 347628 LC-Pe-2 Sales Tay Revenue Bond 3133XC9E6 Agency CMO 347623 LC Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 3137ANLP8 Agency CMO 205o91001 LC 2013 A Capitalized, Interest 3137ANLP8 Agency CM0 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378TAF7 _ Agency CMO _ 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 38377RSZ9 Agency CMO, 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137AUPE3 Agency CMO �- 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 31393V2T7 Agency CM() 34762 LC Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 31393V2T7 Agency CMO 347623 LC Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 31393EXC8 Agency CMO 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 31393EXC8 Agency CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-t .3137B03W2 . ,. Agency. CMO . 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137A7E22 Agency CMO 205491001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 3136A4M89 Agency CMO 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 3136A4M89 Agency CMO 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 3136A8G38 Agency CMO 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 3136A8G38 Agency CMO 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136A72D3 Agency CMO, 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378CRT6 A_iencv CMO 34762 f LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377DPX8 Agency CMO, _ .. . 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31394DVM9 Agency CMO 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31381PEB0 Agency MBS 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 38376GWZ9 _.Agency MBS 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest .. 3132FEAK7 Agency MBS 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 31401MWCl Agency- MBS 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 3128GNR59 Agency. MBS 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 3128MMAK9 Agency MBS 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 36200AFG9 Ageney,MBS 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 3137B6Z18 Agency MBS .347623 LC Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 3138511-F3 Agency. MBS 1205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 31294LPZ0 Agency MBS 1,3.47621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 _3136A4M48 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp ., Federal National_ Mortgage Association, Inc. Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mortgage Cop The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua The Government National Mortgage Association Gua The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua The Govemment National Mortga„e Association Gua Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc _ The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua Federal Home Loan Mortgage,Corp _ Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp „ Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Federal National Mortgage. Association, Inc The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua Govemment National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc _ Federal National Mortgage. Association, Inc Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc.^ mm Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc al_Mortgage Association Inc_ Federal Nation _ Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Federal Home, Loan Mortgage Corp . The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua Federal Home Loan Mortgage Coro 03/27/2019 07/05/2013 800,000.00_ - .875,900.00- 877,848.00. ., 24 034 93 3.750 1.242. AAA I 05/12/2015_ 03/18/2015 675,000.00 674,912.34 --- 674,969.25 31.66 0.000 0.043 AAA; 01/13/2022 .07/05/2013__. 550000.00 ,.._. 529,303.50 ., 561755.00 3564175 '' -2375 1836,AAA! 04/27/2017 --- 575.000.00 574,886.75 --- 580,203.75 5,180.15 1125 0.684 AAA! 05/20/2015 - 1425,000 00 -- 1,424,070 84 - - 1 424 914.50 205.57 0.000 0.044 AAA: 08/21/2017 01/26/2015 200,000.00 200,05000 05/21/2015 199,97400 (48.21) 1200 1.205 AAA: 08/15/2019 07/09/2013 124.863.10 , . 132, 101.26 - 131,103.51 737.45, 4500 1.008 AAA; 10/20/2039 01/21/2015 192,290.97 201.88416 - 203,86784 1,96664 4000 1.289 AAA1 08/16/2033 01/ 2/2015 _...101,104 12..... _. - 101,783.41_ _ 101,855.93 ... - -.... 14836 2.400 1.282 .4AA: 01/16/2039 01/26/2015 178.838.34 186.841.36 - 186,302.88 (435.60) 3.000 1570 AAA: 01/20/2040 __ 30988647 ........ 317,998.81 - - 315,426.62 ._...._ 7209 3000 1.072 AAA: l l/25/20I7 07/15/2013 200,928.84 212,796.20 -- 208,630.44 (48.58) 5.000 0.969 ......... AAA: 10lI6,/2D44 01l23/2015 350,00000 359,262:85 - 359,910.37 .2290 ]4 3500.1291 4AA; 05/25/2018 07/03/2013 251,000.00 258,314.30 2GI,G29.35 (.037.79 2.G99 1.232 AAAI 03l25/2018 07/ON2013 _._34718.9R 36,628.52 - 3G,19190225.02. 5001 0.985 AAA: 0420l2039 07/03/2013 130,GGG.36 I33 769 68 - 135.687 47 2,625 24 3.000 1.506 AAA: 09/25/2021 08/15+2t113 413,652.21...__ 402,793.83___ �- 412;30163 - ....7,293.33 1.459 1530,.,,,,, .4AA: 09/ �/ 021 07 03/>013 413.652.21 404231.92 - 412.301.63 6,029.58 1.459 1.530 AAA; OC/ Si2020 I>/31/2013 134z204.99 142yS50.14; .. 13.756495: (2,691.16),.,,. 2750 0.861 4AA; 10/20/2039 07/OS/2013 IR6.190.17 191884.97 --- 194,518.64 3,636.90 3500 1.666 AAA, 06/I6l2051 03/17+2015 7695225 75,240.62 ._.. - __. '75349.10 .,,.,'. 11959 1240. 20484AA 02/25/2018 07/12/2013 47,667 48 50318.99 --- 49,6>67.61 246.98 5.000 0.990 AAAI 12/25/2017 07/09/2013 311,138.60 330;049.99 - 323,44.1.02 (87.75) 5.000 ` 0.972I AAA! ........... .. ..... - .8. 02/25/2017 07/11/2013 85,G54.32 90.418 84 --- 87,964.42 (150 12) 5.500 0.907 AAA:. Ol/25/2019 IO/21/2013 170,000.00 171z195.31 173,906,26 3,399:56 2130 1416: AAA: 09/20/2041 07/11/2014 53,980.28 56,446.32 --- SG,176.85 32459 1625 0.992 AAA. 02/25/2016 07/15/2013 1437850 GO 1441"445.22 - 1,442,020:37...._339947 1083 0.(135 4AA. 12/25/2019 08/20/2013 171.293.50 168,750.86 - 172,520.44 2952.13 L520 1.174 AAA; 072Rl2015 08/13/2013 ...._117,15119 I23i301.62__ -.. ..........._,._I18,G94.30 - - . 14932 5250 CO3R AAAI ........... .... .... ... . _ .. ......... .. ....2 .......... l Ii25/201G 07/09/20L3 930,000.00 939.227.34 - 938.949.23 6.677.05 1.655 0.760 AAA, II/5f20tG 07/082013 3W0000.00 3100460.16 - 310377000 2203530 1655 0.760 AAA! 07/>0/20d1 07/OS/2013 258,020.15 258,659.05 - 2GG,229.06 R,286.40 2500 1612 AAA: 06/162039 01/21/2015 89,208.98.... - 94,544.48 -- 94,22467 ..._ (301..54),,4 500 1.773 - 4AA1 06/25/2022 07/03/2013 235,000.00 220,358.40 - 238,826.74 15,998.73 2.39G 2.133 _ .4_AA 06/15/2018 07/08/2013 761769.77 4246.01 2.396 2.133 AAA: 805,690.56 - 796,803.56 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp _ 06/15/2018_ 07/08/2013 231,368.92 244,708.78 242,009.80 I,289 85 4.500 0.555 AAAI Federal National Mortgage Association Inc 09/25/2018 07/24/2013 _- 45,270.8847,859.81 Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 09/25/2018 07/24/20I3 407.437.89 430.738.25 - 426 982.69 3 205 OS 4 500 0 521 AAA; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp .,,,,,....,. ............... 08/ 52017 07/31/2013 ,.,...45,000.00 _-- 44,964:84,.,,, -__. ...... 45,424,16,.,. .. _.. ... 51671r.' 1.426 0.836 AAA; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 04/1/>02R 07/O8/2013 275,955.85 285,70054 287,058.93 4,344.60 3 500 0.772 AAA: Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc.01/25/2019 07/OS2013 604,959 09 608,810.97 615,436.98 . - 11,q51.39 .. '1 934 L260 AAA: FederalNational Mortgage Association, Inc. 0l/25/2019 07/OS/2013 185,837.10 187,020.37 189,055.25 2.472.74 L934 1.2G0 AAA: Federal National Man a Association Inc. 08/252O17 07/062013 2,609.328.G9 2,570,800.32 - 2 622 714.55 38 277.96 1.246 0968 AAA Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 0825/2017 07/08/2013 790.448.11 778,77G.65 --- 793,G42.17 11,594 02 1.24G 0.96>R AAA'. Federal National_ Mortgage Association .Inc 04/25/2022 07/03/2013 395,OW 00 375,250.00 - _ 402,327.65 .23,699.98 - 2.482 2.177 AAA'! The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua !0/20/2040 OS/22/2014 132.525.81 127,970.23 132,158.71 4,040.81 2.000 2.049 AAA', The Govemment National Mortgage Association Gua II.,0/2036 .,12l312013.. ... 49,970.34 52,385.03.... ...........-...._.. __...m19,125.58 .1p3,49)-,.... 2500 '1.093 AAAI Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc.0>J25/2034 OG/19/2014 204_11158 215.816 10 213.12616 (673 36) 5 000 1 695 AAA: Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc 11/01/2020 0926/2014 265,00000 .279,036.72 -- 284,201.97 .6,320.68 3.370 1 977 4AA; The Government National Mortgage Association Gua 08/16/2031 07/I I/2013 L2G2.726.77 1.263.6I4.63 -- 1,2G4J09.25 2,684.21 1.864 1.004 AAA'!, _Federal Home. Loan Mortgage Corp, 12/01l2017 07/032013 198 883.76 210,754.64 - 206,929.38 1,91 L49 5.000 0:023 A`AA' Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. OG/Ol/2018 07/12/2013 880,466.19 938,797.08 --- 923,230.43 G,G52.14 4.500 0.590 AAA; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 10/0120i6., ,07l05/20I3 207,232.97 _ 219.537.44 - 212,115.38-i(1,455,39) G000. 2.028 AAA! Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 09/01/2019 07/08/2013 175,903.95 187,007.89 - 186,632.33 2201.42 5.000 1.093 AAA: Govemment National Mortgage Association --- 11/152017. 07/09/2013 56,709.9!_ 60,43150 ._, 58,761.11_ ,(528,09)„-. 5500 1.769 AAA; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp _ 12/25/2019 01/07/2014 52,235.43 53279.55 --- 53.147.3E 11986 2075 1 321 AAA; Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc OR/012017 09/18/2013 140,827.25 203,708 09 -- t97;626:79 - (1,387.10) 6.000 1.596 AAA: ...... - _. __ ...... .._.. .. ................ ........ ......... ..... 8..._.... ....... ........ ._ .-. ... ....... ..... Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp_ _ _ , _ 12/01/2016 07/0.5./2013 175.163 36 185.180.52 --- 180.143 25 (398 52) 6.000 1295 AA_A' Federal National Mortgage Association,Inc 01/25/2022 07/05/2013 389.07322. _. _........._.... 390,167.49.. 39979216•-„695147_. 2098 I597 AAA; 205091001 LC 2013 A Capnali, ed Interest 3128H4NRG Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Cocp _ OS/Ol/>OI8 07/16/>013 102.941.97 109,054.15 108,1G0 10 1 014.42 000 0.510 _ :AAAA: ', 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 31417YKF3 .Agency, MBS Federal National Mortgage Association Inc.01 /01/2030 01/10/2013 173,100 94 182,621 50 188 716.38•�6,662 20 4 500 1 549 AAi347G21LC-Sr Lien Reserve Fund 13137A7JU5 Agency MBSFederal Home Loan Mortge Corp1t/_5.+2017 07/03/20133ti,000 00351.203.13--- 345,3G7 434,958.153.882 1.239 AA'.1347G21 LC Sr Lien ReseneFundl 31404R'7T3 Agenty MBSFederalNationat Mortgage; Association; Inc OS/Ol/2019 1>J31/201398,348.79 109,633.57 103; I5510(3G6981) 4.500 i.174AA: 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 1 31294KZL2 A enc MBS Federal Home Loan MortgageCor. 05/012019 01/06/201453,738 66 58,42E 77 - 56,780.81 (467.39) 4.000 0 261.i _._._. _ .._.._.�. _. _ _ .._ Agency _ _ 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 3128PHVS7 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp - 11/01/2019 07/16/2013 103,738 11 109,314.03 - 108,990.37 1_326 81 5.000 0.150 AAA; 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31 GAEYG6 Agency MBS _ _ Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc 06/25/2018 11/20/2013 164,35043 165.647 27 --- 166,621.09 1,405.40 1.825 1.323 AAA' t347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I416YX12 Agency. MBS Federal National Mortgage. Association, Inc 08/01/2026 07/03/2013 - 70,585.71 73,9_05,44 -- .75,322.02 ;I1;845 83 3.500 1,495 AAA: 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3138EJ6V5 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc 09/01/2026 11/18/2013 141.007 77 149.710 60 - 150,232 50 1.212 72 4 000 1 867 AAA' 57 Page 2 of 23 IBr.tsik F�+rtr irnurpom+Yaw STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Account .\tzcu IIt. Identifier Security Type Category Issuer Final Current race Maturity Trade Date Value. Nest Call Base Market Original Cost Date Value Base Net Total Unrealized `trmnniri%LAI Gain/Loss Con on field Credit Rutin • 205091001_ LC 211 h i A CT.1)ta0zri l tt n2si 205091001 LC2013_A Capitalized Interest 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve • Fund -I 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 205Ai l id 1 LC 013 A Capita zal Inte est 347C,21 LC -Sr Lien Resercc Fund -I tZiiilall LC 013 A Capitalized merest 205091001 LC _013 A Capitalized 347V21 4C•',r Lien Reserve Fund -I 347621 LC Sr Lien Reser, e Fund -I 34'n23 _LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 4 i67.3 LG YF 2 Sales Tux Recemid Batty 3476^_5 LC -Project Fund 7_ Senior Lien 34762.3 LC -Sr Lich Oh Fund-1 Interest 347623 LC-PF-^_ Sales Tax Revenue Bond 7fi __ LC-_Yroiect Fund-2 SeniorL M 347625 LC -Protect Fund Senior Lien 34%28 LG PF 2 Sales fax Isni cnu_ Br nd 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien .6YS t C I F-2 Sales 1-,IN Rey enuc Bond 347623 LC -Sr Lien Oh Fund-1 Interest _ 4 625 _ L C-Project Fund-2 Senior lien 134767-8 LC-PF-^_ Sales Tax Revenue Bond 176_: I C Sr Lien Oh Fund-1 Interest 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 3476^^-8 ,.. 1 C PF-'_,Sales Tax Rey enuc Bond 3476^_5 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 347625 I C Project Fund-2 Scnior Lien 1347625 _ _ LC-PF-2 Sales TlX Revenue Bond 47(2.31 LC PF _ Sides lax Rey erne Band '347623 LC -Sr Lien Oh Fund-1 Interest 343625 _ LC -Project Fund-2 Seim Lien 3476^_S LC-PF-2 Sales_TaN Revenue Bond 347628 LC-PF-2 Sldrs Tux Res en. B0,1 3476^_5 LC Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 47625 LC-Proyeut I rid Scn or Licit :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 347C325_ LC Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 47628 LC PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bon 47625 LC Pra)ezt Eimd 2 Senior Lien .3476^_8 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Re, ern d. Bend 3476^_5 LC -Project Fund-'_ Senior Lien 347625 LC-PE-2 S: e 9ax Re, c eta Bond ':347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 347625 ...__ LC Pr(acct Fund-2 Senior Lien 1347625 LC-PF-.. Sales Tax Revenue Bond 347625 LC Project Fund-2 Senior Lien '13476^_3 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 3 _7/4E LC PF-_ Saes L x 122 ,ride Bond 347623 LC -Sr Lien Oh Fund -I Interest ;47� LC-Prnj¢t F ,d = Scnior Lien 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 247fi 3 L C Pr jen Fund-2 Serrlo Lien 347625 LC -Project Fund-'_ Senior Lien 47C2<. _...., LC Project. Fund Senior Lien ':347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 347628--LC-PF-2 Sales Fax Reyem e Bond 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 47625 LC P'oiect r rid ^_ S n or Lien 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 347625 LC" Project Fund-2 Senior Lien :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 347623 I.0Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Int •s1 20509I 001 LC _013 A Capitalized 1 tcre,t :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 31402QT68 Agency. MBS .Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 10/01/2019 07/112013 315,273..1.T 340,59358 3128MBTH0 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 03/01/2019 07/26/2013 131.183.91 139,054.94 387810CW4 AgencyMBS .The Government National Mortgae.Assoaauao Gm 02/162037 12/112014 201.325.2B 2-da,350.11 15 31335XBG1 4gencv MBS Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 03/01/2018 09/13/2013 23 651.78 �3U'_.I5 314 tOG$ 7 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Associati,n. Inc. Q.......... S ......_ _._....... 31413XVG5 igenci MBS Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 06/01/2019 08/04/2014 200,000.00 218,500.00 3I'_RPGLY7 An�ene)MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Interest 36290WH47 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association 314I8AFW3 Agency MBS • Federal National Mortmge Association. Inc. 38 7SB6A2 Agency MBS Government National Nlort^_aue Association 3140_RBG 3 Ag'uncv MBS Fzilei al Nat ma NI n 1 s 5e mion. Ina 5. ) 6.000 1 661 - 13_' 2, 7 84,,... - 137.831.00 _ _ 930.36 5.000 0,91 I - 2Ciu,2W.t3 (11686) I705 1.954• 24 772,70 (56.87) 6.000 1393 - 171,460 35 (06'78) ' 000 0 975 '- _17798.00 1.71^_. 19 j.5O6 _298_ .� 2 4.Ili2.69 1' )" hj ; 000 -0.537 - 1.070,554.80 (L277.S3) 43,500 (11),(9)205 _d9,3d1. 15 - 73,693 99 87.58 p0U _ 141.318.13 - 14'_49Z37 1.106.0_ L826 2504 09/01/20I9 - 95.610.43 I�t255G.31 -- - d.)S'o^2 ( J74i 6000 I578 1A.4 3140^_RBG3 Agency MBS Federal National Atort a:e Association_ Inc. 09/01/2019 -- 336,973 85 350.693.95 - 4I 40i20 (1 530.67) 6 000 1578 AAA; 8920INAC :.... ,4,ncl Backed Toyota Aim, Recuyat able,. 2t112 F30nncr Trust 07/I52016 02/14/2014 30238068 302,56142 - :07, 12u fA) (39.19 0.460 0#(72 AAA., .......__.. ....... _._..... ........ r ........ 89231N AC7 Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 201 -B 0,ner Trust 07/15/2016 --- 340,004.09 340,20352 - 340 04931 (33.05) 0,460 0.402 _ 3oi onn/1C I. Asset Backed _ GT t q r pnunt t mponai or il C 4enen 2'.I ±-I _ _ 71/251201( _ _ 07/09120i3 , ..,_ 639,106.97,.,., 637,009 89 = �3'}.34s 3 _b.7lc _ a ESt) U sat4. ,AA�4 55' 140 AC 1 Asset Backed N1NI.AF Equipment Finance LLC 2.012 _A 08.1012016 -- 99R.303.50 1 000.853 41 999.11^_.07 39^_95 0,940 0.452 '1 .1s,ee Backed MA141 Fguipinti iilrnti Li._I2-.{ 05!10i201b 01/162014 180,24257 ISO.C,Cs.UI - ISIi'e}3.u7 #.57 U.%40 0li2 A,I.Ne 44890NRP7_CP Hyundai. Capital America 0423.2015 03/04/2015 1.900,000.00 L89K 733.33 - I809.706?6 ^_C,359 0000 0,253 AA 44490NR77 _,. CP l ilt n lai Capital Amer ee _- U4-07i^015 0225/3015 3,400,000.00 3 398 45 i UO - ,399.8480:2 4C.03 L1 (y10 ()2ns AAf 8557^_BR71 Cr Star, ood_Hotels-& Resorts World, ide.Inc- (74'07.2015 03/05/2015 2.000,000.00 1,999,111.12 I999.863.80 30.47 0.000 0.409 AA 85572BR71 _ CP Stares nod l iotcls K Rd.orts VA'orldr. ids. Inc U4;u^U I5 02 _64015 2.500,000.00 2,498,997,9�. - 2499.829 S29 73 (16%1; - 0,000 0 409 AA _.. _-.. i -. _._ .......... 61979KR14 CP Motiva Enterprises LLC 04_01.2015 0 1'_ _013 1.100,000.00 1.099,332.66 - 1099.993.84 (6.16) 0.000 0.202 AAA- GLH79RRA4 CP Mot a Enterprises Ll_C 041( >_ 15 0>r1�^OIS 2,000,000.00.,.... 1,999,277.78 _.I-)JJ18S.8u 14880 O1100 0.233 Ad.A'. ..... _.. ___ .._..._ .... .. ...__.. _- ___......_._ .... .... ..... ......3 _: 2574P1RL8 _ CP Dominion Resources. Inc. 04:20._015 (12725.2015 3,500,000.00 3,497-835.85 - 3.499,53730 313.13 0.000 0.251 AA'. 25741'1RL8 (T_ Dominion Rcsou ca. Inc _.. __. 04/202015 A225rza -, 300,000.00 _ 299,814.50 - 99,96u i4 2684 0000 0^_SF AA_ 44890NRG7 -CP --_ Hyundai Capital America 04'16 _015 02.0232015 600,000.00 599.436.00 599,906. C,6 25.82 0.000 0.374_ AA'. OS 3URFf3 CP Aut>7.o as Inc. (14+i 7''01_ 03ilCv'015 3,500,000.00 3498288.89 - 3499,61 i,p,i 470.56 0.000 0248 .AA'- 05 URH5 CP AutoZone, Inc. 04.17._015 03.16.2015 2.100y000.00 2,098,973.33 - 2.099,7G9.00 28234 0000 0.24S 1A' . 23384ERD I CP Daimler Finance North Anacnca LLC U4r I .i2015 u ; I N2ul ' 2,000,000001,998,792.78 - [ 999,R33 RU I Fi7 13 U 000 i 249 AA 23384ERDI CP Daimler Finance North America LLC (14.'13.2015 02'17.20L5 3500,000.00 3,497,887.37 - 3.499,70J.0 187.48 0000 0. ^_49 AAs -- ---- - x 23 2 0 .......... ' ' - - ' - -' -- 88 138RN2 CP i'hamcon Routers Corporation o4"ai 1_ t73r_"^015 3,IX>D 00000 998,6_5.01 999,611-p.� �757e 0'L7) 0221 A,qi 053'33URE2 CP AutoZonc_Inc. 04.14. 20U 03/19/20U 900,000.00 892652(10 - 899,91954 1^_1.04 0.000 0.248 AA G8^_G811S40 CP 04 FOK Partners. I_P US u42015 03/30/2015 2,000,000.00 1.998 FU222 r 1,999,SIl1 .Ili 1-5.07 Q000 u_^63 AA 682G8US40 CP ONEOK Partners. L.P. _ 05.T74. ^_015 03/30/2015 3.200.000.00 3,19Z7G355 - 3,199,229.44 1J00.1I 0000 0.263 AA _ _.. 29 8UDR77 CP_ Enter nw Products O >uatin_ LLC _ - 04.07 2015 03/092015_ 3,500,000.00 .._ W - 3 499,7( F.14 I L i 79 U OiNr 0 409 AAj _ .. _ ......_ ._........ .....__. ^_9380DR77 CP Enterprise Products Operating LLC 04 07..'.015 03/09/2015 2,000,000.00 L9` 033-34- -- 1999 8G3.8S 63.RS 0 000 _ 0.409 AA': -88513BRE2 CP orison Reuters Co oration 04/U.015 03/11/205 2.00000000 1)i99 l017. i8 - 1999863.88 219.45 0000 0216 .AeAI 3R513BRE2 CP Thomson Reuters Corporation 04.14'2015 03/11/2015 L000,000.00 <x><>.581_II 999,922.20 IOJ.98 0.000 0.216 AA: j _ CogJ. u4aL'?2015 03/102015 2,000,000.001799J%�_22 - 1,999,SRS.uO tl6 LI 0000 0.259 AA. J,: ,7MRJ3 CP Hr.acn Caniml .America _,... ......... __...� _ .._-.... ......_ _.._: d 43357M1IR93 -CP Hitachi Capital America.Corp. _ 04,b9. _015 03/10/2015 3.500,000.00 3198,s33.39 - _3A99,798.75 203.19 OA00 0.259 AA_ .._213_79R'R86 CP Cc once a,illh Edison Gnmpmny ....,. U11 ti. 0{5 _(13/1020 Li 10(10_rgm 00 Idwdi,273 tk] - 1999,R97.1ik7 72.80 0.000 0263 AAi 2G244JILN7_ CP Duke Enen'<� Corporation 04_'_._015 03t5/2015 "SoOS)0000 2.798.92668 - 2,79940Lt! 381.10 0.000 0367 _ AA GU 9KRM3 CP _.. _.A79urn Cnicrprss LLC' ......._ u4 _1 !tLi 0319121lI t_- 3.uun,(Apls[IVI_ 998.525.8: -- 999. G3_50 64.917 0000 0.221 AAA ^_6244JRF8 CP Duke Energy Corporation 0415,_015 03 03r'_015 ^_.000.000.00 1.99N 833.34 - 1.999.70834 97.^_3 0.000 0375 _ AA: 609201CS43 CP, Mondclez International Inc. 05/.04/2015 G3-3117:20I5 t,200 IXx1_00.... 3,198,39521 - 3199222a4 ni.I __... 0000 0,263 4A; G09^_OWS43 CP Dlondelez International. Inc OS/04/20U (Lii302015 I500.000.00 1,499.2421E � L499,638.80 3675E 0.000 0.263 AA' 277431sRL6 CP Eastman Chemical Comp;my__ 04/20/2t115 03r'21.�201i _ rI110000.00 2099,165 N4 - �09QT_2.3R 331.90 0.000 0.251 A.4' ^_7743h12[-G CP - - __Eastman Chemical Company 04/20/20 Li 0323. ^_015 2,100.000.00 2,099,101.66 - 3.099.722.35 331.97 0.000 0.251 A.A'. 3770013S 10 CP Glancoie Funding, LLC. 05/012015 03, ^_sr201s _2.100,000.00 ......,. .... 2,098,880.01 - ..,11P4,-t09 Se 5�9.R5 0000 0.23U M 78573FR7G CP SABMitler Holdings Inc. 04/07/2013 02.02.'_OU 1,000.00400 999,21250 - 999,955.30 3151 0000 Q26S AA' 3 7790BS 10 CP Glancoro Funding [1 .0 05/O112016 0, 2;r201; _ 3,OQ(1,000:00____.._____ 2x998a400.01 - _Gay 2�>?. R.h r99 I'a O U(ID 0 2ho_ _ _ A.4 37790BS10 _ CP - - Glencore,Fu�dine LLC 05 r01/2015 03.35. 2015 L100,000.00 1,099,413.34 1,099J43.^_6 293_25 (1.000 O_^_SO AA 571631SCI, CP ManionInmrnmional,bet 0s/122015 o r,Ur2u1� 2.000,00000 1,998,670.00 - I�>'i8,9oR00 tu,33 0000 0480 AAi 57163USC1 CP Marriott International. Inc. (l5/12/2015 03.30. _OU 3�00,000.00 3197,872.00 -• 3"19S"^_52.80 _ 330.13 0.000 0.480 AA 6S268t1R66 CP OxJPOK Panner<LP. 04/06/2015 0'.iS.^_DI 000,000.00..._-_- 1,998,702,22 - I999.883.3i RC.12 6UUU 042u AA: 74432KR26 CP Prudential Financial Inc. 04/02/2015 0^_'IS2015 2.000,000.00 1.999.163.89 - I,999950.00 (O56) 0.000 0360 A.A 13638XR77 CP Canadi.m Natural Rnaurees Limltcd 04/072075 0304r2015 2,000,IXm.00 I,999,03666 - 1'>`3't910.60 u)60 60170 i^d3 AA- 69430MRC,5 CP Pacific Gas and Electric Company 04/06/2015 03'03. 2015 2,000.000.00 1,999-27L12 - L992940.00 53.89 0000 0_^IG AA u9430t1R6s _ _(.1r Pacil c Gas and Electric Compagr �- - 04/06/2015 0 /09/201> 3.200,000.00 3,198,833.79 - 1,I ,904.pi� 8C,?2 U U0.1- 0.2 16 AA '_S 103BR61 CP Edison International 04/OG/20G U3.03. ^_015 3.500000_00 3,49R,506.GG - 3.499.76655 (0.12) 0000 0481 AA1 .t _ _ _20 .. _ .- 2R10313R61 C1', Edison International _ 04/06/2015 ;2r15 2.000,00000 1999146.66 - L'n�n,s6G h0.... Ec7r') )000 0481 AA _..._. t - .. ._...... _ x. 14 ..._. ---_. 57163URT5 CP M1tarrion International, Inc. 04/27/°0 L5 03. 1');_0li 90U 0(10.00 899,475.00 - 899.69_ ._ _ - 1.ha 3157 0 000 0 475,.. AA 27yu3MR 6>_ CP Ecolab Inc. 04/06I20L U3/03/2015 2.0Uu 000 (>0 1,999,2RR.R8 - 1,999.923.4U r1 51 t(.11 )iNJ (C)1,4277 27C, A4 27886MR62 CP Ecolab Inc. 04/OG/2015 03/03/20U 3,OOn_000AO 2,998,933.32 2.999.885.10 _ 51.77 0.000 0.276 _ .AA' 481 ICiM9 Corporae _ 1V41organ Ch;tw Build, National Association 06/13/2016 07/11/2013 500,000.00 492,775 00 - 498,650.00 1,633.80 _ 0 6ti0 t 822 4= 78008K5A 1 Corporate Royal Bank of Canada 04/19/ O16 07/08/2013 2,000 000.00 2 099,900.00 - 04'3,460.00 > >0O 07 ^_.875 0.793 AA 61746BDG8 Corporate, „ ....._Morgan Stanley - ,........ - 02/25/2016 07/032013 500,000.00 49G,725.00 - 03 _G0.00 ,,.,. 4,403.29 175U 1 i)2ti .A'. ..... ..__.... .._.......... _..... _ _ _.. -...: 89li3VAC3 Corporate Total Capital International 06/28/2017 07/08/2013 160,00400 157-765.60 - 161.795.20 3,079.02 1.550 1.042 AA1 05/01/2017 07/172013 237,058.85 24ei Yo0.77 09/15/2018 07/18/2013 1.023.063.51 1,087.004.98 06/012022 07/102013 260 784.17 11/16/2052 01/22/2015 145,917.97 AAA: AAA; A A.1 AAA AAA'. A\\ AA Ai 1 \'. AAA; AAAI 58 Page 3 of 23 M=.11 161MEM �Y -1:r{altew Trtmsx.Inr:m Camrrirkn STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Annum AceDuni Secyrily Type Identifier t a4eeus� Issuer Final Current Face Maturity Trade Date Value Rase Net Total Nest Call Rase Market unrealized Summarized Ori'in:d.Cost Date Value Gain/Loss ;.Cou rn Yield CreditRatirm 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Funds Interest 38143USC6 Cor1w art 3.47023 LC Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 02580ECC5 Corporate =Jt','+IOttl IC. 211/1 ACapn>ilved Inicre,t 14QAE8 _ Carpi ir?ste :05091.001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest S^_ a82AC6 Corporate LC S Lien 1 Interest 48121CY106 Corporate 476=3 LC Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 172967FD8 Cormorate K001001 LC 3a I3 A Capltahzed Interest 44328MAL8Corporate .. _ 05091001 LC2013 A Capitalized Interest 59217GAV1 Corporate 147023 Et Sr Lien Ob Fund flinterest 59217GAC3 Corporate .20509I001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 90327QCW7 Corporate 4 62.3 LC -St Lien Ob Fundll. interest 89233P6J0 C rpurale 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 89233P6J0 Corporate I- .n tl LC-2 l 3 A Cup Tali zed Interest 637E 3AF7 C r orate 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 38144L.AB6 Corporate 347�..-.._..-_L C-Sr Lien Oh Fund-1 In644'e4 767201 ARIA Ctrrpnrute 050JF001 LC 20t3 A Capnalved Interest 742718DN'8 Corporate 347621. _ LC -Sr Len 01, Fund-1 Interest 36962G31f5 CoTo me 2 )5091(701 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 459200GX3 Corporate _ - Pi i47 623_ LC Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Intere,a 69 49_LA_L= C rporale 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 233851.AT1 Corporate .347623 LC St Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 05565QC.-QR C olporme 17623 LC Sr Len Ob Fund-1 Interest 94I80N AF5 Corporate 347625 _ Lt Projeet Fund-2 Senior Linn 61747C7_L� _ NIN4 Fund 347628 LC:PF-^_ Sales Tax Revenue Bond 61747C715 NIN1 Fund 347(+2! LC -Sr Lien Resenc Fund -I 61747C7I5 MM Fund 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 61747C7I5 MINI Fund _i _ LC- 2h13 A Capitalized Interest 9AMNIFO5B2 Mkt Fund 205091001 LC-2013 d Capitalized Interest 407288YD5 Mum 147o28 LC-PI-2 Salo, Tax Revenue Bond 4-07288YD5 Muni 1347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 407288YD5 Muni ,) O, I i 01,.... t C-2013 A C g nallzed Interest 23521.9172 Muni Li47623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 2352191S2 Muni 2.s )v10u1 LC 2011 A Capitalized (rimiest 64966iJ1 7 Muni 205091001 LC 2013 ,i Capitalized Interest 184126YS3 Nluni 205001001 LC 201 3 A Capitalized Interest 912828R K2 11S Got :347621 LC -Sr Lien Re;erve Fund-1 912828WK2 US Go 347oll LC -Sr Len Resent Fund-1 912828KO2 US Gdv =05091001 LC01 A CapNitalized interest 91 S 8G2_ US Gov 347623 LC_ Sr Lle1 Oli Fund-1 Interest 91?121R\0 US Gov 20509I001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 912828SY7 US Gov 347621 LC -Sr Lei Reser, e Fund-1 vt28331Cl2U L'S Gov 347621 _ LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 1 91 4'_SUFS US Gov 3t7621 I -Sr ire 12,me Fund-1, 917Y38V63 US Go, 205091001_ LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest_ 91 8--SSU5 US Gov L 47l121 Y.C-SI e Krxrce Fund-1 Y12BiAtIIIs_i LIS Gar 347021 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 91 8_8T19 US Gov n _1 , 01 LC 211 ACapitalized Interest 91 S 8VAC, US Got 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828U:A6 US Goy ,.' I C Si L �i On Ilind-1 tnteresl 91 8_8LIA6 ltS Goy 205091001 LC-^_013 A Capitalized Interest_ 91 S SRU6 US Gov_ 347n28 LC-PP-2 Sales TaxReverse Bond 64468EA1'h VRDN 3476^_S LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 64468E:4Z3_ VRDN The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. American Express Bank, FSB. - Thu Toronto -Dominion Bank Shell International Finance B IPNlorvn Chax Bank, Nationnl .huigafion CIt soup Inc-.- ..... I ISBC Bank' PLC Metropolitan Life Global Fundui, I kl tr ,pulnarl Life Global Funding 1 USA.,‘ Capital Corporation.. ...... _ T,,ola Motor Credit Corporation Toyota Nlotor.Credit Corporation Apple Inc The Goldman Sachs Groff Inc. Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited The Procter S Gamble Company General Electric Capital Corporation International Business Machines Corporation PM:. Bank. National Association _. Daimler Finance Northm Aerica LLC BP Capital ,Ahike . P ,. C Bells FartoBank National Association Mor ,i .r ley II i tut onsl Lqu day_funds Nlorsian Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds Stanley I,at o t oral Liquidity Funds Mo _an Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds r! S L3� ,: V O8_y Nt:uLet Acent. u i t�'id. Hamilton, County of Hamilton<'rtrec, Hamilton. County of D Ihtis Cay or Della City of Y _ Nte York (on of Clinton County Water Authority _ Tnamrvy. United States Department of _ v Treaun, United States DeP artment of _. T Teasur, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of T asun, Un11,d Slat, 1)_1,u1Tek}61 Treasury. United States Department of T asun, United States Department of Treasury. United States Department of - Tr,t1SurV.l u to t Slat s Doi„,onnont of Treasury, United Stale,, Department of Trey , n, L'.nh ei 9a a ..n_I 1.Al Treasun, United Stars Department of Treasur v. Umm I Slat, DeFutmcnt of Treasury-. United States Department of _ Treamirk, tinned States Dep tineni of Treasury. United Stales Department of Larxu. New I ianipsh re Dep,el .ent ul Labor, New Hampshire Department of 02/072016 0'03r201+ 600,00000 627936.00 09 13 2017 07.08.2013 250.000.00 287,890.00 10 19'211 r, l 201 i 750 000 00 77645250 0322 2017 07.08 201S' 400 000.00 449,936.00 HOC 2017 07 (J12013 300 0 )o 00 341,424 00 _0519 2015 07. 03"2013 614-000.00 649.79006 0 - 24 201, - 3.62 >(4 ,, 3,799.301.25 00. 29 2015 07 31 2013 545_000.00 553 76360 - 612i840r00 _ _ 3,4 51 49 3.625 1.088 277,105.00 4:4432.7 6-000 1477 - _ 76(?50;00_-,l57.?. 4 5 _ .-/P _ - _433,256.00 _ 3.2i7.24 5-291 0.941 -- 332,052.00 711.113) G400 1(127 - _ 617,321.74 74701 4750--0677- 243.75 Fh74 44 3-1 Or) 0.770 546.68950 554.87 1700 0.429 (707y 21)15 t 2n13 74 (u) 766.284.80 747.259.40 ._S)6.4C, ?SOU o51I 1'_13. 2016 07.11-2013 4.000.000-00 4,14544000 4094,52000 ^L^^R.7S 2-250 0-850 _ --___ 1, I'�'uU It ._.^I 41i ,'llun SU2.34100 h01 96.00... ]if 43 U875 17.324 _.. - 07.1'.-Oli 07.U3-013 5000000.00 802.344 00 >,O(1R,100D0 5,946.55 0-875 0324 1 i3 2t111,07_31 1_�II. :.ilili.. 3,000,840 003,001,290-00 54,. ij 44.30.3 _ i .A8 09.O1,2017 07.03,2013 300000-00 322,515.00 33?G79.00 I'>,0T_.0'_ ti. _50 LG34 ___.._. r _)2r,1,, 32:)!3 Gn u1 G17,400.00 - 611,310.00.,.,. 4323,4/i ?S,Ni O. S3+t OS152016 0710 ^_013 1.240.000 .0(7 ],256,03320 - 1-354,793.20 7577. 13 I A3_0 057G 44 t [ A.," 1 i . ),r^_,, L 30. 0o t)0 340,212 tll1 - 331 737.00 7 Nt S - c L i _ f _J 7 lA 0722.2016 07:10-^_013 465000.00 47793690 - 473,449.05 .7JLS1 L>>0 05�4 - --- -- -- --- 1 9 2+� l6 t 20l , `� + , h)0 aU 499,180.00 6L'4"JLLi • 499,950utr 2C,7.37 U s73 _ t7 799 01 112016 07:08.^_013 500,00000 497995.00 - a01.8a0.00 352.00 I o007T A I I •iz "` U , ,G; 2013 300.000 00 292.f94U0 - 25721ii9.INl -! r,24. 1 I 1.375 I >+i> �1i 05. 16-2016 07. 11.20I3 - L000000.00 988,160.00 - 997,770.00 2,471 C8 0.467 (1672 __ -�; ie . 1.3 iL -_ - GC,,343.22 - GfiS�i.22 C; U5,+ ,,,,,, A:4.A'. 03 3 L 2015 ___ _ 55-980.00 - 55 9R0 00 0.05t 0-080 A A.A u ,I201= .. 95,GB263_.,, -- _. rk,,i)27.0., - ir.0,p0 Oi! - add; Oc 31, 20li Ox30'^_OI5 _...__103.97058_ - 10,G40.(7.. pnepr _.O OSO... AN i 03:31 %2015 --- - 350,824.92 -�- 35,1,S2.3.42 _ - , ui,I. _ 1.) ., , 12012015 07/18:2013 _.080,000. 00 2.080,000.00 - '_084,867-2(7 4,567_'U 0.803 0451 AAt t 1201 i 0711882018 6.fi4;, not 00..,. _ 62645,000.00 - C�GY2,675 70 17,07570 . 803 0 40.1 A N. ..... .. ................... - _.... ..._............ , 1201.2015 07:18'2013 630,000.00 630000.00 - 631,67iS0 1,675.80 0.103 0.403 AAS 2132i17 07i10201 _I3�000 Ott_ 2135000.00 - ', l31,675 SO '4 C_970 I�i39 '1 ?.i ,_'L.'-017 0710.20 13 600-000.00 __. 650,000.00 � 6579SSS0 tJSS50 's39 0925 AA L.170000 00 ] 238,222 70 t _ I _3'.5417 70_ _ I M1. I L: i km '-,;. �lA'. 0�.01._017 (, I i._Ci3 770,00000 755939.80 - 77ti398.70 I-1_'_40.8G 1.300 O.s3b AA - - - ' ah t 4900000u. II486,31s 2C, - II Jk8,85Lm1 60154 O.UYn 0.pyt MIA; 0131.2016 0 _42014 li000000 142935.64 - 142985.00 L^.92 O.U80 0.004 AAA: ;t..lo OTOSr20'13 50001ttl00 Si99(12.34 537,81u 00 9354.74 7. I. - AhA- , 1.2016 07+05.2013 5 000000 00 4_973.63257 - 5,0(18,'_00 00 19,087.78 (7.5(1(7 03d4 AAa; -, .::. „113,^_l11.3 9500001h7 945,31'_.R9 - 9?�3!><1,C14 9,024-1'_ Qtl75 (7.485 i.44': . _..... _ 'J5.31.^-O L7 07'Oc ^_013---3.900000.00 0,423550.75 0.900,3I ^_.00 40,381.68 O6^_5 O.G'_1�t A.i • s 15 �'1115 07'O.S.,2013 380.0+.A10U 35?.5I7 fi) - 3dR,757.20 6,212 97 0.Ot1iS a+i4i� A.i:N 12 31 2019 03,06:2015 95.000.00 92,599.02 - 04.094.65 I J6ZC,3 1.I25 L333 l A \. _ - __, _ 05 152023 U70ii2010 3-50000000 3,2s303�'J4 34h1,i35.ut1 188,971.91 C�SU I.N2' 44.4 05.15:2015 01PIt_(115 800A00.00 SOOS0000 - S00.12500 (73.53) _ 0.'_50 QI^_I A.AA W0002018 p7/0si2PI3 3.500. ri i 00 3.483.730 47 - ,,,! n, Oiy i ),7.12 1375 a 98A 1A'.'. Oa li,_(T_2_ 07/05,2013 495A00.00 401,35547 491,015-2a _...._.23.S2Z60 + 625 _ 1 7-12 ik.A'. V30/2t117 07/05/2013 1750,00090 1,70u_507.81 - 1,,4_.r, LS.uti 22,94294 0.n25 0 ,RS .i+,,A'. 11/30/2017 07/31/2014 140.000.00 137.189.06 - 13'?409.^-0 1,6669,7 0.625 0.785 AAA 11/30/2017 07/05/2013 I?�0 n0000 1,214,64844 I.. 4,,2s(1(1 16387.R2. 0627 , 785 -...._ A.1A 11/30/2016 07/05/2013 3500.000.00 3.496.855 47 - »'_3,800.00 25,350.46 0.375 0.4tli -1,1 \ A +i. h� .i : NA� AA AA. tA''' \A t4' A AA .A. 11/01/202011/04/2013 ... 4,1 9ti,000.00 4,190000000 04,01 2015 4.19+Y,000-00 - 0I'Irr o 11/01/2020 07.'012013 3,200,00000 3.200,000.00 04101;2015 200-00000 (7.I 10 0.110 A:A 224,771,14124 22633834325 226,830.183.89 986,368.01 59 Page 4 of 23 IMEn 'Enenlde {e0tiy 710:' ale/ipl turieri 363 STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended March 31, 2015 ATTACHMENT 3 Source Account Account Base Net Total Security Type Final Current Face Neat Call Unrealized Summarized Identifier ...Category issuer Maturity .Trade Date Value Original Cost Date. Base Market Value Gain/Loss Cog+on Yield Credit Rating :34762I LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 .3137EACA5 ,Agency...,.... Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 134762I LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I37EADB2 Agency , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 1347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3135G01A2 AgencyFederal National Mortgage Association_ Inc 34762I LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3134G5EK7 Agenwfederal Homc Loan Mortgage Corp 34762I LCSrLien Reserve Fund-1 31395EZP5 ,._,. Agency CMOFederal Home Loan Mortgage Corp_ _ _08/152019._07/09/2013 124,863.10_ .132,10126 347621 . LC Sr Lien Reserve Fu d-I 3837(WA(2 ,Agency CM() Thc Government National Mortgage Association Guar: 10202039 01/21/2015 192 290,97 201,884.16 34762I LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376G5B2 Agency CMO_„ The Government National Mortgage Association Gunn 08/I62033 01222015r IO1J0412 101,783.41 134762I LC -Sr Lien Reserve F d I 3837GTSZl Agc cv_CMO - The Government National Mortgage Association Guar, O]/162039 T - 012620U I7R 83R.34 18G,8413G :347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377UN211 Agency CMO_ The Go crtm c t National Mortgage Association Guar 01202040 --• 309,886.47 317,908 81 _.. _....._. 347621 LC-SrLicn Reserve Fund-1 8376GB33 Agency CMO The Government National Mottgagc Association G 10/1G/2044 Ol/23/2015 350,000.00359.262.85 _ '347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3137AEV77 Agency Federal Homc Loan Mortgage Corp 05252018 07l032013 25 L000 (10 258�1430 347(r21 LC -Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund 1 31392//83 Agcncv CMO Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. 03/2520IR 07/OR/2013 34.71 R.98 3G,62R.52 _-_ :'347G2I - LC Sr Lien Rcscnc Fund-1 _ 38377RVK8 Agency CMO., The Government National Mortgage Association Guar .04202039- .07/032013..- 130,666.36 133,769.68I35,687.47 _ 2,625.24 3000 _ I,SOG 747(2I -. LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 ., 3I37ASNH3 Agc cy CMO.. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp„ _....... 0925/2021 07%032013 413,652.21 40.1.231.92 412,301 G3 6.029 SR l 459 1„530 1Jµ t 347G2I LC Sr L rn Rcscnc Fund 1 31397QUQ9_�_ Agcnw CMO__ Federal National Mortgage Association,, Inc_ W252020 12/312013 134,20499 142,j50 t4 - 137 564.95 _(2,69I.16) 2.750 O.R61 �`_jF'i.l 347(2l LC -Sr L ReserveF d1 3R377JZ89 Agency CMO Thc Government National Mortgage Association Guar: _. 10202039_ 07/052013 186,190.17 191,AR4.97 --- 194.518.64 _ _T 3,G3G 90 3000 1GGG A1A: 347621..,,_ LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 - 38378BX20 _ Agency CMOs..... Government National Mortgage Assonalon _., .,.,.,. 06/16/2051. _. _03/172015._.- 76952,25 . 75,240.62__. _._ _ 75,349.10_ 119 59 - 1 240 2,04A AAA 347G2I LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3137A T24 Agency CMO, ._.,. Federal Homc Loan Mortgage,Corn,_ . Ol/252019 „ 10212013 170,000.00 171.195.31 - 173,906.26 .. _ 3399 5C 2 130 1.416 AAA: 1347621 LC -Sr Licn ReserurFund-1 38379C2M7 Agency' CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guar, 09202041 07/112014 53,980 28 56,446.32 - 56,176.85 (324.59) I G30 _ ._ AAA: 1347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 _ _ 3136A7M18 AgEnY: CMO Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. 12252019 08202013 171 293 50 168.750 86 - 172.520 44 2,952.13 1520 1.174 A.4A 1347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378TAF7 _ . _ AgencyCMO _ The Government National Mortgage Association Guar ._ 07202041 07/052013 251020.15 _ 258,05905 _ _ --- ._.,_266,3.29.06 _ -, _ 8,28G 40 2.500 _ 1.612 ,AAA; :347621 LC -Sr Le Reserve Fund-1 38377RSZ9_. Agency The Government National Mortgage Association Guar.. .. 06/116/2039 01212015 8920898 9454448 _ _.._..._..........:9422467 (3f1154) 4500 1.773 AAA'. . _ .. ...... ... ... ...... _,3 347G2I ._ LC Sr Licn Reserve 3I37AUPE3Agwcy, CMOFederal Homc Loan Nlortgoge Corp, 06252022 07/032013 233,000.00 244 64.84 - 238 26.74 _ 15;998.73_2396 2.133_ ,AAA: 347G2I LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I 3I37B03 W2 Agency CMO Federal Homc Loan Mortgage Corp 08/252017 07/312013 45 000 00 44 9G4.84 - 45.424.16 S IG.71 1.426 0.836 AAA I 347G2I LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-t 3137A7E22 _:_Agency CMO.._ _Federal l-loinc Loan Mortgage„Cq[p_ _.....__ _04/152028._ .._07l082013..__ 27595585 285;700.54 - 28705893. 4,344.60 3500 _ 0.772 AAA; :347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3136A72D3 Ag •icy CMO Federal National Mors gc Association, Inc. 04252022 07/032013 _ 395,000 00 375.250:00 - -- - 23.699.98 2.482 2;177 AA.A, ;347G2I_ LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I 38378CRT6 AvCMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guar; 10202040 05222014 13Z52581 12797023 - 132 I5871 4(,0504304801)' 2U011 2.U49 AAAI 347621 LC-SrLien Reserve Fund -I _ _38377DPX8 Agcnw CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guar: 11/20/2036 12/312013 49,970.34 52,385.05 - 30,458 71 2.500 1093 AAA; :,347G2I LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1._. _ 31394DVM9 _ Agency,CMO..... Feral National Mo Imo Association. Inc. , .,. 02252034 06/192014 _ 204,111.58 215 816.10 .:._ _ 213,126.16 . _ (673.36). ^ 5600 ._ LG95 _ . AAA: 347621 LC-SrLien Resew Fund-1 31381PEB0 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc _ I I/01/2020 09/262014 2G5,000.00 _ 279,036.72 _ -- 284,201.97 G.320 68 3 370 1,977 AAA:. '347621 .____LC Sr Licn Resencfundl _372RMMAK9____Agen MBS Fcderal�Home Loan Morlgagc Corp 09/012019 07/082013 17590395 187.00719� - 186,G32.33 220 i.42 5.000 1.093 AAA 347621. _ LC-SrGen Rcscnc Fund-1 3137B12L8 Agency MBS Federal Homc Loan Mort_,gagc Coro, 12/25/2019 01/072014 52,235.43 53,279.33 96,702.16 201.42 2.075 ].32I ,_, A4.-1'. 347621 __.LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136A4M48, .Agency MB$.__Federal Nauonal_Mortgage Assocratien,_Inc,.... 01R52022_. 07l0520I3.,38%073.22 _.,. 390,167.49 ,= 396,70216 .__._693147 _ 2098 ._._Li07 A.4A'. 1347G2I LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31417YKF3 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Assoct o , Inc. _ _ , 01/012030 _ 07/102013 173 100.94 182.62150 - 188,716.38 6.662.20 4 500 49 - - AAA 347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3137A71U5 Agency MBS Federal Homc Loan Mortgage Corp 11252017 07/032013 325,000.00 351,203.13 - 345,367.43 4,958.15 3.882 1.239 A.AA. 347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 _ _31404WTT3 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association Inc 05/012019 12/312013 98348 79 109,633 57 - 103 155 10 (3,G89 %I) _ _4 000 L 174 _ A.r.4 347G2I _ LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1. _ 31294KZL2 _ -Agency MBS.___. _,.. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp _ .. 05/012039 ...,.__ 01/06/2014 _ 53,738.66 _ 58,426 77 _ _ = _ 56,780.81_ (467 39), . _ 41}OU 0,261 _ _ _ AAA I347621 . - . LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3I36AEYG6 Agency MBS _ . Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 06252018 .. 11202013 1 G4,350.43 ..... 165,647.27 166.621.09 I,405 40 _ 1.825 1323 .IAA 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund t 31416YXJ2 _Agony MBS Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. 08/012026 07/032013 70 585.71 73,905.44 .-• 75,322.02 I,R45 83 3.500 1.495 AM 34762I LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3138EJ6V5 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc 09/012026 11/182013 141.007.77 149,710.60 - 150,232.50 1.2112:72 __ 4.000 1.867 AAA' 1347621LC-Sr Licn Reserve Fund-L. _ _ 383781CXW4 Agency MBS.. _ ,ThgGo Government National MongsgeAssociation _Guan 07J362037 _l2l,712014 _. 201,32528 ... 200,350.1 i- 200.29953 _ _., _(]tG 86) 1705 .�1.954 A.A.A. 347G2I .LC Sr Licn Reserve Fu d,i.,_ 31385XBGI Agency MBSFederal National Mortgage Association Inc 03/012018 09/132013 _ 23,851.78 25.402.15 - 24,772.70 (>,G R7) 6.000 1393 _ _ .A.i4'. :34762I LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 31413XVG5 Agency MBS Federal National Mon Associatigry Inc. OGl012019 08/042014 200A00.00 218,500.00 - 217.798 00 1,712.19 S.SOG 2.298 AAd':. .347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 31418AFW3 Agency MBS_ Federal National Mortgage Association_ Inc. 06/01/2022 07/102013 260,784.17 269.341.15 273.69299 1,712.19 3.(1110 1.021 :r.4A'. 347621 ..-__LCSr Lien Reserve Fundl..__ 38378B6A2..,_..__Agency MBS.....:. Government National Mortgage Associatiorr-11/162052.._ _0122/2015, _ 145,91797 ._141,318.13_ •- ,._._. 142,40737 _ „ I.787.58...... I826 ,.. 2,504 AAA'. 347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 6I747C715 _MM Fund .,.,.. ._ Mo.ga Stanley I stitut o al Liquidity ,_W Funds .._03/312015 -. _ . 95,682.63 _ - 9( 027 OG - 0 0%0 0 OA(l A.�,4 ...... ._ 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund./ 912828WK2 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 01/312016 0224/2014. I50�100.00 149.935.64 -- 149,085.00 12.92 , _ _ 0 ORU 0.094 AAA' 347621 LC-SrLicn Reserve Fund-1 912828K132 US Gov _ Treasury. United Statcs Department of 05/152019 07/0i2013 500000.00 539,902.34 --- 537,890 (1(l 9.3 R4 74 3.125 1.235 AAA '347G2I__. ,.,.. LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I__. 912833KRU US Gov _ Treasury, United, States Department of.,. 05/152018- .07/052013„- 380,000.00., 353,517:80 _ _ 368.95720 6.21297 0000 .,. 094G _- .4A.4 ;34762I LC-SrLien Rc cnc Fund -I 912828UF5 US Gov Treasury, United Statcs Department of 12/312019 03/06/2015 93,000.00 9259902 9409465 - I467 G3 -_ 1h5 _ 1333 AAA. '347621 LC -Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund-1 912R2RV63 US Gov Treasury. United Statcs Dcpaitnient of OS/152023 07J052013 3,500,000.00 3$53,085.94 -•- 3a481,133.U0 I88,97191 1.750 1 822 _ A.aA'. 34762I LC -Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund -I 912828T19 US Gov Trcasurv, United Statcs Department of 06/302018 07/05/2013 3.400 000 00 3 483.730.47 --- 3S43.I90.00 53.937.12 1.375 0.988 s.aP.':. __. :.337G21_ -__ LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 912R2%TJ> US Gov.....,,.. Treasury, United States Department of..:.: _08/152022 07/052013,......._. _495,000,00_.. ._461,355 4T. _ _ -- 491,0I5.25 23,827 6U..- .,. 1.625 1.742 A,4f.'. 347621 ..,LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 912828UA6 US Go ........ _ .. Treasury. United Statcs Department, of , - 11/30/2017 ....,, 07/312014 ,140 000:00.... 137,189 06 ._.. - 139.409 20 1,GGG.95 -.._ 0.625 IL785, _ AAA i 18�678 609.23 1 347623 LC -Sr L Ob F d l Interest 3I37ASNH3 „ Agc cy CM0 Federal Home Loa Mortgyc Corp_ 09252021 OR/152013 413,G52.21 402.793.R3 - 412.3(lLG3 7,293.33 1:139 1 530 4AA: 147623 LC-SrLien 0b Fi nd-I Interest 3137ANLP8 Agency CM() Federal Home Long Mortgage_Corp I_1252016 07/092013 930,000.00. 93922734.... - 938,949,23_ ._(,677 /15 - 1655 U760 .4elAi n Ob F d I Interest 31 9 .. ....... gory_...__..._.._.. .... _............_...__........ ..:..... - .. ....... ...... 3V2T7 Ayc c, CMO .. Federal Home Loan Monbagc O6/1o2018 07/082013 231.368.92 244 708 78 - 242,009.80 1,2A9 %0 3 000 0 c55 441' 347(3 LC Sr Lien .. - 047623 LC Sr Lien Ob Fu d I Interest 313J3EXCR Agcnw_CMO Federal National MortgavgAssogratioq Inc 09252018 ' 07242013 45,27088 47 859.81 � 47.257 8fl 356 5 _ 3 S(Hl U 521 AAa; [347623 LC-SrLc Ob Fund-1,Interest 313GA4MR9 Agcnty CMO Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 012�2019 07/052013 IA5.837.10 ]87020.37 _- IR90»�� _ - 2A7 71 1934 1260 -AA 4' ;347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 313GASG38 Agency CMO. Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. 08/25/2017 ,._07/082013. , 750,448.11 _ 778,776 63 .. -_ 793,642.17 11.594.02 1246 0.968 AAA ;347623 LC -Sr Licn ObF nd 1lntcrest 313RS1LF3 _ Agency MBS _., Federal National Mortgage Association.Inc. __-08/01/2U17 09/IR2013 --_ 190,82720 - 20370R 09 197,R2G.79 (1.3%71(1) _ (f100Lo9G 4.a A'. +347623 LC Sr Lien Oh Fund -I Interest 3I402RBG3 _Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association -Inc. 09/012019 -- 95,610.43 102,556.31 --- 99,829.72 (339J4) (0011 L57R AAA . ___..._._..-_ .�.r ..__.._..... _ _ _ _ _ ;347623, LC -Sr Lien ObF nd lln[crest 3GI62WACIiAssct Backed- GE Equipment Transportation LLC, Series 2013-1 11/25/201G 07/092013 63910G 97 G37,00989 _ G39345.35 6477G 01911 113R4 4.aA. 1147623..., LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest _ 61979KRI4 _ CP_ _ Motive Enterprises_ LLC _....... ... ..........._.._04/012015, 02/122015 1,190,000.00.. .._. 1,099,332,66 __. 1,099,993.84 (6 l6) OUOU 0202 M:4 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 2574P1RL8 CP _ Dominion Resources. Inc 04202015 .02/252015 _ 300,000 00 299,814.50 _ 299 960 34 2G R4 _ 0.000 0.251 AA '3476_3 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 44890NRG7. CP Hyundai Capital Amcnca O4/1620IS OL022015 600,00000 599,43600 - 599,9W 66 . 2582 _(1000 0374 _AA. 1347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 05333URE2 CP AutoZone Inc 04/14/2015 03/192015 600,000.00 899.659.00 - 899,9I954 12l 04 _ 0 00(l 0 24R .r.�, ';347623 ..., LC -Sr Lica 06 Fund -I Interest 88513BRE2 ..._CP..... _ _ Thomson Reuters Cerporetron _ _ 04/142015 03/112I 015 1,000,000.00 99.MY 999 922 20 ._ 109.98 _ 0 000 0 216 AA . ... 347623 LC -Sr 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund -I Interest_78573FR7G _ CP .. SABMiller Holdings Inc. 04/07/2015 - 02/022015 1.000,000.00 999.212.50 999 955 30 31.51 0 000 0 268 _ _ AA Z'. -_ _. Lien Ob F nd_I Interest 37790BSI0 CP Glencore Funding LLC 05/012015 03232015 1,100,000.00 1 A99A13:84 -- _ 1.099743 26 293.25 _ 0 U00 _ 0 2A0 AA Vt _ _ . ...__ .._.... 03/27/2019 07/052013.--..800040W 875900.1ML. _877,848:00 24,034,93.,. 01/13/2022 07/05/2013 550.000.00 529.303.50 568.755 00 35 641.75 2.375 1.838 AAA; 04272017 -- 575,000.00 574,886.75 - _580 03 75 5 180 l5 1125_ _ 0.684 _ AAA; 08/21/2017 01/262015 200.000.0(1 200.05000 0521/2015 199.974.00 (48.21)_ 1200 1.205 AAA: -•- 131,103.51 737.45_ 4.500 1.008 AAA 2033167.84 1,966.64 4.000 1.289 AAA'. - I0a,855.93 _ 148.36 _ 2.400 1.282AAA[ - 186,302.88 435.60 3.000 1.570 AAA' - _315,426:62_ 22.09 ._.. 3.000 1.072 _ AAA, 359,910.37 2.290.14 _ 3.500 1.291 AAA1 - 261,629.35 6,037.79 79 2.699 1.232 AAA1 - 36.19I90 22502 5.000 0985 Ali. Page 5 of 23 Gaetids County $atlspattotioi Cams i sion STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Accotmt Account Identifier Base Net Total Security Type - Final Current Face Next Call Unrealized Summarized Cateaory Issuer Maturity Trade Date Value Ord final Cost Date Base Market Value Gain/Loss Cou ton Yield Credit Rating 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Intern st 57163URT5 CP Marriott International- Inc. 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 48121CJM9 Corporate 1PMorgan Chase Hank, National Association 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 61746BDG8 Corporate Morgan Stanley 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1. Interest. 38143USC6 Cor porate The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 02580ECC5 Coroorate American Express Bank,, FSB. 81.57 0.000 0.475 AA] ....... .. .... ... ......-. ....... .... ._. _.x .. ....._........_..._- ._. :.. .__1,63380 0600,-, 11822..:_At 0225201G 07/032013 500,000.00 _ 496,725.00 --- 4,403 29 1.750 1020 A 02/072016 07/032013 600,000.00 62�36.00 •- 3.451.49 3.625 LO88 A] --- 4.452.72 6.000 1477 Ai !347623 LC -Sr Gen 06Fund / Interest 48121CYKG Corporate ' JPMo an Chase Bank, National Association 10/012017 07/032013 ... 300,000.00 _ _ " 341,424 00 332,052:00 ...7;U17.34 G 000 1.622 A� :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest I72967FD8 Corporate ..., C tigroup Inc.�03/192015 07/032013 G14 000:00 649.790.06 --- 417,321.74 744.01 4.750 0.677 A 347623 LC -Sr 59217GAC3 Corporate 161etrlitort.LifeGlobalFundinpl 09292015 07/0320I3 740,1100.00 766,284.80 - 747,259.4096.46 2.500 0.511 ;AA( 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 89233PG10 Corporate Toyota Motor Credit Corporation 07l172015 07/032013 800.000 00 802344.00 -- 801 29600 951 45 - 0 873 0 324 AAi :347623 ......LC -Sr Lien ObFund.1./merest 38144LAB6.._.Cork:Tate The Goldman Sachs Groupinc. ,...... 09/012017 ,. _..07/032013.. _ 300,000.00 _. 332,515.00 332,67900 19i07202 -_ 6,250 1.634 ,...mmA� .347623 .. _LC -Sr- L Ob Fund-1 Interest 767201AM8 Corporate, . _ Rio Tinto .F a en (USA) Limited 05202016 07/032013 600,000.00 ___ . 617,460.00 _ _ _ --- 611,310.00 4,323.00 2.500 0.829 A' 347623 LC•Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 36962G3H5 Corporate General Electric Capital Corporation 09/152017 07/012013 300,000.00 340,212.00 --- 331,737.00 �7,690.83 5.625 1.237 AAj ;347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 69349LAL2 Corporate PNC Bank National Association 04292016 07/112013 500,000.00 499.180.00 04292015 499,950.00 2G7.37 0.573 0.793 A 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 233851AT1 - Corporate ' Daimler Finance North America LLC 01/112016 07/U82013 .. _ ...._500,000.00....497,995.00 499.950.00 -- 501,850.00 2 482.00 _ 1,250 0.772 - Aj ... ........... ... .................................................................. ........!Pm..... ... '347623 LC -Sr Gen Ob F nd I Interest 053659CC0 Corporate BP Capital Markets P.L.C. 11/062017 07/032013 300.000.00 292 194 00 --- 299,859.00 _ 4,624 11 1375 1.393 A: :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 94980VAF5 Crpomte Wells Fargo Banff:, National Association 05/162016 07/112013 1 000.000 00 988,160 00 -- 997,77000 2�471.68 0.467 0.672 - AI ;347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest G1747C7li MM Fund Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds 03/3I20I5 03/302015 ]03,970.58 --- 103.640.67 - 0080 O.ORO AAA: :347623 - - LC -Sr Lan Ob Fund-1flnterest 40728RYD5 .ham:- .Hamilton Cou p, of ]2/012015 . 07/1 B2013 630,000.00 _ G30,000,Ot1 63I,,675 EO ...1,675.80 0.803 0 403. AAj 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob F rid 1 Interest 2332191S2 Muni Dallas City of _ 02/I52017 07/102013 650,000.00 650,000.00 -- 657,988.50 7,988 30 1 389 0.923 AA ,. _.. .... .. ... ..._. ..... Treasury. ... .Dep.. _ . ..... ..... .... _ __ - i 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-l. Interest 1 �:912828RX0 US Gov Tr United States Department of 12/J 12016 09/132013 950 (100.00 945,2I2.89 956.460.00 9 024a2 �'0.875 � 0 485 AAA 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 912828UAG US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 11/302017 07/052013 1,250 000.00 1,214 64R 44 - 1,244,725.00 IG,3R7.82 0.625 0.785 AAA; . .. .......... ....... ........................................................... ............................... 22,018,73957 .347625 LC -Pro ect Fund-2 Senior Licn 89231NAC7 Assc[ Backed Tovot Auto Receivables 20I2-B Owner Tms I 07/152016 -- 340,004 09 340.203 52 - 340,049.31 33.05)..0 460 0 402 AAA: . r.1 . ............... ..... ....... ... ... .....0,00 ...._- ....... _ .... _. ..__ .....-_ ....._.- 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 55314QAC1 Asset Backed MMAF_ Equipment Finance LLC2012-A 08/102016 01/162014 180 242.57 180,665.01 +- 1,8039397 43.87 0,940 0.452 AAA! 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 44890NRP7 CP Hyundai Capital America 0423/2015 03/042015 1.900.000 00 1,898.733 33 1.899 70G 26 263 39 0 000 0 253 AA: '347625 LC -Project Fand-2 Senior Lien 85572BR71 ..- CP .- T.. Statarwood Hotels.& Resorts Worldwide. Inc. 04/072015„ _:,03/052015.,_ ._2,00t?m i)" I,99Aii.12 = 1,999,86380,,, _...,_3U47-..0999. ; 0.409 _- ... AAI :347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 61979KRA4 CP Motiva Enterprises LLC 04/102015 03/122015 2.000 000.00 _._.._._l 959 277.78.__. 1999,888.80 ....._..._._.. 148.80,. _.._..._0.0(ID0.223_.._ _ - AAA; 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 05333URH5 CP AutoZone, Inc: 04/1720/5 03/162015 2,100.000.00 2,098,973.33 2,099,769.00 282.34 0000 0.246 AA 1347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 23384ERDI CP Daimler Finance North America LLC 04/132015 02/172015 2.000 000.00 1.998.792.78 - 1,999.833.80 107.13 0.000 0.249 AA '347625 LC -Pro not, fund-2 Senior Lien 682680340 CP ONEOK Partners L P. .05/04/2015 03/302015 2,000,000.00 1,298,602 22 - - _ . L999,518.4Q 875.07 0 000 0.263 �AAj .. .. ......... ............ ....4/0 .. .......... 0 ..............-............00 ...00..0 .... ...... - _. .... .. __.. .... ... ...... .... :347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 29380DR77 CP .,...., _ Enterprise Products Operating LLC .. _ ....." - .. 04/0720]5 03/092015 2.000,000.00 _ 1,999,033.34 - 1,999.863 88 G3 88 0.000 0.409 AAi '347625 _ LC -Protect Fund"2:Sanior Lien 88513BRE2 _CP _ Thomson Reuters Cor�oralion 041t420I5 03/1f2015 2,000A00.00 1,999A17J8 1�99_,8_44.40 21995. OD00 0216 AAj V347G25 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 43357MR93 CP Hitachi Capital America Corp. 04/0920I5 03/102015 2.0(H1 000.00 L999.162.22 - 1.999.R85.00 I1G.11 0.0(10 0.259 AA '347625 LCproject Fund-2 Senior Lien 20279WR86 'CP __ Commonwealth Edison Company,.:_. .,.,,,.,. 04/082015, .,.-03/102015,., .2,00000000 ._..1,�99.A75,00 .........___........,-.,_1,999 2.7.R0 _- 72R0 0.0(10. ' .tl:2G3 AAII 347G2" LC P F' d 2 S L' 2G244JRF8 CP D k E C C 04/1-201 " 03/032015 2 000 000 00 1 99R 833 34 - 1,999.708.34 97.23 O.000 0.375 AAI 1,499,638,80 _ 367.56. 0.000 0.263` 2.099.722.38 331.96 0.000 0.251 AA - rolcct un cmor men 347625 LC -Project Fund 2 Senior Lien 4;60920WS43 _ CP '347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 27743KRL6 CP J 347625 LC•ProjectFund2 Senior Lien 37790BS70 -CP: Gicncorc Funding LLC....... -_ OSlOL2015 U3252015 2,100,000.0(r 2,098,880,01 _--__ 2099,5(19.86 55985 0000:.Fl280 347Gb _ _ LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien37163USC1 CP Marriott International, Inc OS/122015 03/3020I5 2 000 000.00 1,998 G70 00 - 1,998 908 00 _ _ 2i)G 33 0.000 0.480 AA :347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 682680R66 CP ONEOK Partners. L.P. 04/062015 03/052015 2.000 MI0.00 1,998,702.22 - 1,999,883.34 16. 12 0.000 1).420 . AAI 347625 _ LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn - 74432KR26 CP _. Prudential Financial. Inc. 04/022015 02/182015 2,000,000.00 _ 1,999,163.89 - 1,999,980.00 _ _ (05 0.000v_ 0.360 - AA; i347625., LC -Project fu�•2 Senior Gen 13638XR77 CP. Canadian Natural Resources limited ,. _ 04/072015 03l04/2015 2,000,000.U(I _1,999,036 66 - .1,999,911ib0 _, It0 (0 0000 0268 AA1 347623 LC Pro cet Fund 2 Senior Licn 69430MR63 CP, Pacific Gas and Electric Company 04/06/2015 03/03/2015 2,000,000.00 1,999 271 12 - 1 999,940.00 53.89 0.0(10 0.216 AA! .. ... ... J ........ .... ...... ... .. _..... .. ... _...._.._ _. :347625. LC -Protect Fund-2 Senior Licn 28103BR6I CP Edison International 04/062015 03/032015 2,000.000.00 1.999,146.66 W 1999866.60 (0.0D 0 000 0 4111 _ AAA, :347625 LC-Projwt Fund-2 Senior Licn 27886MR62 CP Ecolab Inc. 04/06/20li 03/032015 2,000.000.00 L999,288.RR 1,999,923.40 34.51 0.000 0.276 AA :347625 LC-Fmk-et,Fund 2 Senor Licn 61747C715 MM Fund Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity, Funds _ 03/31/2015. _.. - - 66,343 22 .6G;343,22 _ _ 0,050 _ A.080. .... ,_. _..... .. ....- ...... ..... .__-- .. ...... _ .._. ..._ ...._ ___..._. _ - - 42,28184896 _ i347628 LCPF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 3133XCQE6 _A_gencv CMO Federal Home Loon Banks Office of Finance 07282015 08/132013._ II ,7151,19 _123,301.62 - 118�694.30 149.32 - 5.250 �1.038 0427/2015 03/192015 900,000.00 899,475.00 06/13/2016 07/112013 500,000.00 492 775.00 09/132017 07/08/2013 250.000 00 287 890 00 899,691.57 498,63000 503,260 00 612,840.00 277 105.00 u c ncrgy orpora ion .._.....__. > . Mondelez International, Inc. 05/042015 03/302015 1500.000.00 1 442%249.16 Eastman Chemical Company 04202015 03232015 2.100.000 00 2.099.165 84 y 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 89231NAC7 Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trusl 07/15/2016 02/142014 302,380.68 302,581.48 - 302,420.90 (39. )___ U.4C0 0.402 AAA: 347628 LC PF-2 Saks Tar Revenue Bond 55314QACI Asset Backed.... _ _ MMAF Equipment finance, LLC 2012-A ,., 08/102016 .........._ , --- 998,303 30 _ „ 1,000,853.41_ ... , - _ 992,142.07 _ 392.95 0.940 0.452 ;347628 LC PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 44890NR77 CP Hyundai Capital America 04/07/2015 02/2520I5 3,400,000.00 3,398.453.00 - 3,399,84802 RG 02 0.000 _ 0.268 AA 347628 LC PF 3 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 85572BR71 CP Stanwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. 04/072015 02262015 2 500,000.00 2,498997.93 - 2.499,829:75 (16.09) 0.000 0.409 AA € i347628 LC PF2Sales Tax Revenue Bond 2574PIRL8 CP Dominion Resources Inc. 04/20/2015 02252015 3,300,000.00 3.497,835.85 - 3.499,537.30 3I313 0.000 0.251 AA= 347628 ......_LCPF2Sales Tax ReyenaeBond 05333URH5 CP AutoZoneInc 04/172015 _-,03/162015 .., 3,500,000.00 1198,28819 .._- 3.422,615,00 490.56 0000 0.248 AA, .347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 23384ERDI CP Daimler Finance North America LLC 04/132015 02/17/2015 3.500,000.00 3.497.887.37 3499,709.15 187.48 0.000 0.249 AA': .347628 LC PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 88513BRN2 CP _ Thomson Reuters Cop_.,ration - _ 04 222015 0323201500 3 y0 000.00 3,228,_635 01 --- 2_999,6/3!30 575.79 0.000 - 0.221 __AAI _ _. a... _ _._ 34762R LC-PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 68268US40 CP _ _ ONEOK Partners L.P. 03/042015 03/302015 3.200,000 00 3,197,763.33 3,199,229.44 1,400.11 � 0.000 0.263 - AA' 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Ta Revenue on 2J3R01)R77 CP ,Entcrpnsc Products LLC.._ _... , 04/072015 ..._ 03/092015 -_ 3,500,000.00 -- „3,49R,425.00 _ _.3,499761 79 _ l i t 71 0,000 tl 409 AA; .._ _ ... _ 317628 LC PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 13337MR93 CP Hitachi Capital America Corp„ Qitt)92015 03/I020U 3,300.000.00 3.498.533 R9 --- 3,499.798 75 203.1') O.000 0.259 AA _...... ._ ., .. _....-...P - .... _ .... £ 347628 LC PF 2 Sates Tax Revenue Bond 26244JRN1 CP Did:c Eneryry Corporation 0Y.222015 03252015 2,SOOD00.00 2798926.68 2799 40L11 381.10 0.000 0.367 AA! - 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 61979KRM8 CP Motiva Enterpnscs_LLC _„ _ - 04/212015 03/192015 3,000,000 00 2,998.525 83 - 2.999 632.50 649.17 0.000 0.221 AAA; ,347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 6r0920WS43.. _ „CP„ Mondelez International, Inc. ..,, _ 05/042015 _ 03/302015_ 3,200,000.00 _._......._3,198,398 21 - 3,192,329.44 _.. 784.12 _.. 0.000 0.263 AA' ;347628 LCPF2Sales T Revenue Bond 27743KRL6 _.CP Eastman Chemical Comps, _ 04/202015 03/23/2015 2100000.00 2099,10166 --- 2099,72238 33197 0000 0251 AAi 347628 LC-PF-2. Soles Tax Revenue Bond 37790BSI0 CP _ _ Glencorc Fundis_LLC _ 05/01/2015 '03252015 3,000,000.00 2998,400.0I - 2.999,299.80 799,79 0.000 0.280 _ AA 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 57163USC1 CP Marriott International, Inc. 05/122015 (13/30/2015 3 200 000 00 3,197 872 00 -- 3.198252.80 330.13 0.000 0.480 AA; '347628 LC PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 69430MR65 .,._CP... Pacific Gas and Electric Company 14/062015 , 03103/2015 , _ , 3,20000Q0tt -, r 3,198,833.79 3,129_224;00, _., 86.22 0.000 0.216.. :347628 LC PF 2 Sales TaxRevenue Bond 2R103BR6I CP Edison International _04/062015 03/032015 3,500,000.00 -- 3.498.506.66 3,499 766 55 (fl 12)-0.000 0.481 AAi ;347628 ....... LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 27886MR62 - CP Ecolab Inc. -- -- -- 04/062015 - 03/03/2015 3,000000 00 2,998,933.32 2.999,885:10 31.77 - - 0.000 0276 AA 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 61747C715 MM Fund Mean Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds 03/312015 - 55.920 00 55.980.00 0.050 0.080 AAA 347628 LC PF.2.Selcs TarRovenue Boud4U728RYD5 Mum.,..,.... _ Hamdlton,_County of .... 12/01/2015 07/182013 ..6,645,000tN) ",_... 6,G45,OOFl Iat o,f,G2675 iii� _ .- 17,07070 _ 0803 .:0.403 AAI� ,347628 LC PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 64468EAY6 VRDN Lobar Ncw Ham shire Dc mtment of 11/01/2020 6�1/042013 4,190,000.00 4,190 000 00 04 01/ 015 4,190,000.00 0.110 0.110 AA' Page 6 of 23 Drelvdi Cray Trongndation [bombs* STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Account Account Security Type identifier Category Issuer Base Net Total Final Current Face Nest Call Unrealized Summarized Maturity Trade Date Value Original Cost Date Base Market Value Gain/Loss Coupon Vield 'Credit Rhine 1347628 LC PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 64468EAZ3 VRDN LaFor, Alew Hampshne DcpantneN of 4 M.11/21.120 07/03/2013 32001100.00 3;200.00000 04/012015 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 313384FM6 Agency Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance 05/122015 03/182015 675,000. 00 674,912 34 - 674,966 23 _ 31.60 a 0u0 0 Of? A� 205091001 LC 20I3 A Capitalized Interest 313384FV6 _ AgcncyFederal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance 0520/2015 - 1,425,000.00 1.424,07(1.84 - 1,424 914.50 205.57 0.000 110'-1 _AAA; :205091001 ..,,_.,LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 31392FPP6 Agency CMO.... Federal National Mortgage Association., Inc._ ,.....11252017... .__. 07/152013:.. 206,928.84 212 796.20 ._...- 208 (,0 44...., (05R) , O041 0.9A0 _ _ AAA] 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 3I392HWL3 _Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc, 02/25/2018 07/12/2013 47,667.48 50,318.99 = 49,667 61 246.98 5.000 13.990 AAA: 205091001 LC•-2013 A Capitalized interest 31392F6C6 AgencyCMO Federal National Ivf__ a-gc Association, Inc. 12/252017 07/092(113 311.J3860 33004999 -- 223,74102 (87,751 5Ulul 0672 AAA 1205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest _ 3I392BVM5 _ _ Agency CMO,-. _ Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 02/25/2017 07/112013 83,654.32 90.418.84 87.964.42 (U0.12) 5_.500 _ 0.907 AAA; 205091001 LC-2013`A Capitalized Interest _ 3136ACGF2 _Agency CMO .Federal National, Mortgage Association, Inc. 02/25/2016 07/15/2013.;._ 1;437,830.60 1,441.445.22.._. 1342,020 37 3 399.47 _ 101;3 0.635 AAA. 1205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 3137ANLP8 Ag . CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 1125 016 07/08/2013 3,070,000.00 3,100 460 16 - 3.103 ,70 00 22.03530 1.655 0.760 AAA: 1205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 31393V2T7 Agency CMG Federal Home Loan Mortgage. Corp 0(!lSZ0t8 07/082013 761,769.77 803,690.56 - 796,803.56 4 246 01 4.500 0.555 AAA) 1205091001 LC-2013 A Ca_pitalized Interest 31393EXC8, _ Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. tr7?5 .2O LR 07242013 407 437 89 430 738 25 - 426.982 69 _3,205.0S 4 500 0.521 AAA; 1205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized. Interest 3136A4M89 ...,_Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association Inc. hl-..alt.'11.119_. ._._07/052013._ 604,959.09 _.. ;608,81097 - 613,436.98_ %All30 ..._ 1.934 1260 Akki 205091001 LC 2013 A Ca italized Interest 3I36A8G38 A,gcncv CMO Federal National Mort a c Association. Inc tut 23 2i117 07/082013 2,609,328.69 2,570,800.32 - .622 714 55 38277 96 1.246 0.968 AAA! 205091007 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest '38376GWZ9 Agents MBS The Government National Mortgage Association Gaga eteUrJt3i 07/112013 1,262,726.77 1,263,614 63 - 1.264,709.25 2,0%4.21 1 864 1.004 AAA ' 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 3132FEAK7 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 13:01.2017 07/032013 198.883.76 210.754.64 - 208,929 38 1,911.4.9 5 000 0 023 AAA; 205091001 LC 2013 A_Capitaltud Interest 31401MWCI Agency MBS .._ Federal National Mortgage Association. lac , aLU}0 11 i 07/122013 _ 880,466.19 __ _ 938,797.08 - 923,230.43 (+,6 14 T. 4.500 0.590 AM. 1205091001 LC2013 A Capitalized Interest .3128GNR59.,,.. Agency MBS Federal Home LnMortgage Corp IOut 701! 07/052013.,..._ _ 207.232.97 ._...... 219,537.44 - _.. 212,115.38 (1,455.391 6000 2028 AAA 1205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 36200AFG9 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association IVivi°i7 07/092013 56,70991 60,431.50 -, 58,76L11 (52809) 5500 1769 AAA; ; 20509100I LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest __, 31294LPZ0 _ AgenC MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp -_ _ _I1:01!1016 07/05/2013 175.163.36 185,180.52 180.143.25 (398,52) 6.000 1.295 AAA! 108,16010, 1,01442.. 5000,.; _.;LL0.510!._ _AAA_ 20509/001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 3128H4NR6 ... Agency MBS_.. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp ,., _ 0?_91 2011 07/162013 - IO2 941.97 I09,054 15 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 3128PHVS7 Agency MBSFederal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 1101 2010 07/162013 103 738.11 109,314 03 - 108.990.37 ._ 1,326.81 5.000 0.150 - _Lg114; _ 1205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized interest_ 31402QT68 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association Inc. 180612019 07/1120/3 ._ 315,273.20 340 593.58 - 331 45933 (2,337 84) 6.000 1:661 0 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 3128MBTH0 _ Agency MBS Federal Ho c Loan Mortg ge Corp _ _ (1101'2019 07/26/2013 131,183.91 139.054.94 - 137.831.00 930.36 _ 5.000 0.911 AAA i .295091001 LC2013 A Capialrzed Interest 31410GSQ7 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc I2/01'2017 07/05/20I3 164,127.13 176231.53 .. -- 171,460:35 (0 i.08)6000 0975 AAAI :205091001 LC 20I3 A Capitalized Interest 3128PGLY7 Agc cy MBS...... Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp , , , - 054)1.2017 07/17/2013 _ 237 058.85 _. 249,800.77 - _ 249.032.69 4,797 65 _ 5.000 -0 839 AAA _. _..... _.. ..... 205041001 _ LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 36290WH47 Agency MBS Government National Mongagc.Ass i; uL u'I,15'20I8 07/182013 1,023,063.51 i I,087 00+?8 - 1 070,584:80 (1.277 83) 4.500 0:905 _AAA: 1205091001 LC 20I3 A Capitalized Interest. _31402RBG3 _. Agency MBS , Federal National Mortgage Association. Inc. 09/01/2019 -- 326.973.85 350.693.98 - 341 40320 (1.830.671 6 000 1 578 AAA; 1205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 78008K5V1 Corporate..... Royal Bank of Canada 04/19201 e 07/082013 2; 011,000.00 2,099.9110 00 - . - '_ 04. 4(.0 00_, 5300.67 2.875 0.793...... _ - _AA. 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 89153VAC3 Corporate Total Capital International 06/28/2017 07/08/2013 160.000.00 157 765.61) _ 161 79520 3,079.02 1.550 1.042 AA ;205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized interest _89114QAE8 Corporate - The Toronto -Dominion Bunk 10/1920I 6 07/082013 750 000,00 776.452 5(1 - 769 050.00 __ 6,385.37 2.375 0:724 AA 20509I001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 822582AC6 Corporate _ Shell International Finance B.V.03222017 07/(182013 400 nI11) 00 449 936.1111 - 433,256.00 6,217.24 5.2110 0941 AA 1205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 44328MAL8 Corporate - HSBC Bank PLC 05/24/2016 _-3,625.00 00 3,799.301.25 - 3.721 243.75 25,G88 64 _��3. WO 0.770 AAt 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 59217GAV I .Corporate Metropolitan Life Global Funding I 06/292015 07/312013 545,000.00 55 63.60 - 54( 689.50 _ 554.87 1.700 0.429 AA1 1203091001 LC 2013 A Capialvd Interest 90357QCW7 _ . Corporatc_. _ _ USAA Capital Corp_oration - 12/ 13/2016 07/I 12013 ! 100.u00.00 4.1454-V42, = 4,094,520.00 21228 78 2.250 0 830 Aoki ;:205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 89233P610 Corporate Toyota Motor Credit Corporation 07/17/2015 0711 2013 5.0(10 000 00 5,014,650 00 - 5.008,100_00 5,946 55 0.875 0.324 AA; :205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 037833AF7 CorporateApple Inc. 05 02 20I6 070312013 ).000.009.90 3, 90,840 00 - ? 001,290 00 956.35 0303 0.268 AA 1205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 742718DV8 Corporate - The _Pr ct & Gamble Company_ 08/15 2016 07.10/2013 1240 000 00 1- 56 03i_20 I.254 793 20 7,577 13 1 450 0 576 AA; - _.. _. _...._. .. !205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 4592011GK3 ,C�rme International Business Machines Corporation 0722' 1I ( of I0p013 465,000 tit) 477.036 30 _ ... 473,440.05 2,791 RI 1950 0.554 AAI 205091001 2.ux4,xG7 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 9AMMFO5B2 MM Fund U.S. Bank Money Market Account Fund 03:31 Yl Li --- - 350 824.92 -• 350.1124.92 - 0.000 0.000 NA; 205(191001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest_ _. -,.._ _ _ - -.P40788YD5 um Hamilton. County R;nl 2ul5 n 155n13 2,080.006 0n _ ^,itRuyOu.nli '0 _ 4R6720 0.803 0.451 .• AAI ._2M ..... .. _ - 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 235219/52 Mum Dallas City of , ,., _ 02115 2017 07 102013 I 5 U040(1 2,135,000,00 . -. 2.1(39.629.7(1 34,629 70 1.589 0.715 AA 205091001_ _ LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest .,.64966H4E7 Muni _ _ _ Nmv YorkSity of __.. 1001 017 0711 r 201 t _ 1.170 00 00 L 11222 76 _ 1,23 840.70 21.,691.15 3.140 0.961.. AAI 1205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 184126YS3 Muni Clayton County Water Authority 05;01 2017. _ .. ll 11 __013 --- 77(1 000.00 755,939.80 - 776.398,7(1 14240.86 1.300 0 896 AA; LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 912828WK2 US Gov TreasuryUnited Stag Dcoan ion of 01/3I 2oi r, 04 �s/2n14 1 [ A90 100.00 I 416 31526 - 11.438445 L00 603 54 0080 0.094 AAA, .. , . 2 ...0 _. o _. ......... .... ... ......... . _ 205091001 .. ... .. _. ..., _ .:.. :.. _ _ ip(14 UU 0(1 19.08778 _ - .... 0500 0.364 AAA= ',205091001 LC 2013 A Capi ahzed alcrest 91282RSY7 US Gov Trnasury Umlcd Statc. Dcpairtmcm of 0,.51 2016 0 05.21113 3,90a 000.00 21(28 530. 78 3, 1114312.00 � 0. ,., ,, p 1 - 3J. 4 381.fi8 0.625 0.621: A� 21)5091001 LC-2013 A Caprtalved Interest 912828SU5 US Gov Treasure. United Sates Department of 05:75r2015 UI ?1:2015 800,000.00 SU0,500 00 - 8II0L128.00 _ _ _ 713.83) 0.250 0.121 AAAi 2050910(11 LC 20I3 A Capitalized Interest 912828UA6_ - US Gov .Treasury, United Slat Depart nein 2f 1 _I t302017 0" 052013 1 7i0.000 00 _L7 )u 507 S1 - 1,742,615.00_,. ,..., .._..j - _ _ 22,942 94 0 625 D 785 AAA° 2050910(11 ,LC-2013 A Capitalized I tcrest 912828RU6 US GOv Treasury, United States Dcoartment of 11, 30 2016 07105' 013 3 500 000.00 3,496 455 47 3,523,800.00 25,350 46 0.875 0.465 AAA: .. .. .. ...____ .-.... ... e. - -' .._.... .. _ 71 A30,236.98 , 3200.000.00 0.110 0.110 AA. 72,120949.16 62 Page 7 of 23 Riverside County Transportation Commission STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2015 ATTACHMENT 4 Source Account Account Beginning, Base Identifier Description Markel Value Base Purchases Base Base Change In Base Maturities Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued Base Sides and Redemptions Base Paydmvns CainlLoss ccretion Cain; Loss Market Value Income Balmice 347628 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 6I747C715 MORGAN STANLEY LIQ PRII LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 44890NR77 Hyundai Capital America 347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tao; Revenue Bond 07588MQX7 Becton, Dickinson and Company :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 27743KPH7 Eastman Chemical Company 347628 LOEF-2 Sala Tax Revalue Bond 1248C3N59 CBS Corporation :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 2574P I RL8 Dominion Resources. Inc. 347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 03251 WQT9 Anadarko Paruleum Corporation :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 68268UPD3 ONEOK Partners, L.P. 347628 :. LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 25737MPK8 Dominion Gas Holdings. LLC :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 43357MR93 Hitachi Capital America Corp. :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 26244INC9 Duke Energy Corporation :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 6I979KRM8 Motiva Enterprises LLC ,347628 ::... LC-PF-2:Sales Tax Revenue Bond 27743KRL6 Eastman Chemical Company ,347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 57163USCI Marriott International. Inc 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 89231NAC7 TAOT 2012-B A3 575.161 94 5.299,644.90 6,299.162-10 476.736.62 1347628 ! 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 3779013 Glamore FundinH LLC LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 60920WPH7 Mondelea International, Inc. :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 64468EAZ3 NH BUS TXB-SER B 1.200.000.00 69,422820 20 3,398,453.00 3,498,369.58 4.198.582 50 (69,942,002.14) (3,500,000.00) (4 200�000 00) (5,300.000.00) 3.497 835.85 - - 2,198.951.94 - (2,20000000) 1,309.00 L630.42 1 417 50 217.89 1 388.32 1,048.06 86.02 137.21 55,980 00 3,399,848.02 313.13 3 499.537 30 2,598.908.00 (2.600,000.00) 1.092.00 - 4.997,888.90 (5,000.000.00) 2,111.10 - i 3.498.533.89 - - 1.061.67 203.19 3.499.798.75 (6,300.000.00) - 654.50 183.40 - - 2.998.525.83 - - - - 457 50 649 17 2 999,632 50 - 2,099,101.66 288.75 331.97 2,099.72238 _ - ! 3 197.872 00 - - 50 67 330 13 3 198.252.80 (174 262.04) (48.17) (24.09) 18.58 302,420.90 G 1.82 : 4,997.551.40 3.498.687 50 (5,000100.00) (3.300.000 00) 2.448.60 1,312 50 - - I 3,200,000.00 293.31 ; 347628 _ LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 20279WPS4 Commonwealth Edison.Compam -. _ _ , 3998.680.00 (4-000.000.00) 1,320.00 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 6362P3QP2 Nanonal Gnd USA - 3,498.818.75 - (3,500.000.002_ 1,181.25 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 847576Q56 Spectra Energy Partners, LP - 1.699,697.77 (1,700,000.00) 302.23 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 68268UQ59 ONEOK Partners- L P 3 998 951 12 - (4 000.000.00) 1 048.88 - , - - :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond - 61979KPT5 : Motiva Emerpnses-LLC - 3�498,570.85 - (3,500,000.001 - - 1,429.15 - , 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 36162RAC2 GEEST 2012-IA A3 121.95552 - - (121.914.07) (0.00) (18.96) (22.49) - - 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tar Revenue Bond 57163UP91 -Marriott lnternanonal Inc 3,998-368.00 - (4 000 000 00) - - 1863 35 (231 35): - .347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 85572BNP5 Stanwood Hotels & Resorts Wort 3.299.217.90 - - (3.300,000.00) 806.67 (24.57) - _ - '..347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax. Revenue Bond 55314QACI MMAF 2012-AA A3 1,197,710.35 (475,156.4134.22) (138.60) (60523) 721>7'8"F 19333! 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 55314QAC 1 MMAF 2012-AA A3 460 719 25 - - e82,776R3) (110 96) (67 59) (197 68) 277.566. 19 15; 07 m '.347628 LC-PF-2:Sales Tax Revalue Bond 3024X.1N26 FMC Technologies, Inc. 6.999,727.00 (7.000.000.00) >GG:I1 _ 206.89 - - 347628 LC PF 2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 43357MNL0 Hitachi Capital America Corp 3.099.352.10 - - (3.100.000.00) 70353 (55.63) - , _,-, , 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 9I058UQG1 UnitedHealth.Grow Incorporated ;347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 6821 A3QB4 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 377908880 - 724.889.23 - (725 000.00) 1.10.77 • - 2.899.204.11 - (2.900,000.00) 795.89 - _-_ • 6.499,376.00 - (6,300.000.00) 503.55 118.45 - - 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 407288YD5 HAMILTON SWR-B-REF 6.660.416.40 - - - - - 2.259.30 6.662.6770. 11.786.45-. '347628 LC-PF-2 Soles Tax Revenue Bond 08465S B8 `'Bedsbire HathawayEncrgy Com - 3,998.844.44 - (4-000.000.00) - 1.155.56 - _:__ 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 85572BR71 Stanwood Hotels & Resorts Wort - 2 498 997 93 - 847 91 (16 09) 2.490.829.75 - .347628 LC-PF-2:Sales .Tax Revenue Bond 81685MNP4 'I.Sanpra:Energy Global Enterprise 3.999,052.00.. • (4.000.000.00) 928.88 19.12- _- _ _ _, :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 28103BN57 Edison International 6999-531 00 (7 000.000 00) 241.11 227 89 - - i347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 05333URH5 sAutoZone, Inc. - 3498.288.89 - 855.56 470.56. 7,09,61• ii. - - _ ,347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 57163UQW9 Marriott International. Inc. - 2.198.712.34 (2.200.000.00) 1.287.66 - - '347628 - LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 64468EAY6 ` `'NH ST BUS FIN-TXB-A 4-190,000 00 • - _ - - 4. f94000 00 384.118 : 347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 23384ERD I Daimler Finance North America I - 3.497.887.37 1,634.30 187.48 3.499.7(79.15 _I 347628 '...: LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 03741 PQ54 :. Apache Camration. - 3,999.253.32 - (4-000.000.00) - 746.68 _ _ - :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 91842MNW8 VW Credit, Inc. 3 499.237 77 (3 500 000 00) 762 23 - - - 347628LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 88513BRN2: .Thomson Reuters Corporation 2.998.625.01 - 412.50 511 7, 2999.6I 3.30 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 68268US40 ONEOK Panners. L.P. - 3,197 763 55 - 65.78 1400.1 I 3.I99;229.44 - 347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 29380DR77 Enterpnse Products Operating1 ._-. - 3,498,425.00 - - - 1 225 00 411.79 3.409 761 79 ,347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 43812XAB1 HAROT 2013-3 A2 1.281.735.64 - (1.281.672.83) 1.23 0.80 d4.841 - 347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 43357MPK0 Hitachi Capital America Corp. - 3998380 00 - (4 000 000 00) 1 620.00 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 05333UNP I AutoZone. Inc. 3.999.052.00 - (4.000.000 00) 1.124.45 r 176 a51 :347628 >LC-PF-2 Sales Tax. Revenue Bond 27805BNW1' Eaton Corporation - 3,998,755.56 - (41000000.00) 1,244.44 - - 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 262441RN1 Duke Energy Corporation - 2.798 926 68 - 93 33 381.10 2-799.401.11 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala. Tax Revenue Bond 0081U3PTl - -Aetna Inc. 4.298.409.00 (4,300.000.00) 1,591.00 - - 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 60920WS43 Mondelcz International, Inc. 3.198,398.21 47.11 781. 12 3.199.229.44 ,347628 LC:-PF-2 Sales :Tax >Revenue Bond 1563W3QW7 Centnca PLC - 3,49831223 (3,500,000.00) 1,68777 - - 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 262441QP7 Duke Energy Corporation 3.497,725.00 (3.500.000.00) - 2.275.00 - - - 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 377908S10 Clencore Funding LLC - 2,998,400.01 100.00 799.79 1,099.299.80 ,_ 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 29380DP95 Enterprise Products Operating LI - 4.997.875.00 - (5,000,000.00) - 2.125.00 - - - 1347628'. 'LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 361591CS8 GEMNT 2012-1A 1,705334.18 - - (1.705,000.00) 0.00 (182.43) (151,75)' :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales T. Revenue Bond 36I591CS8 GEMNT 2012-1 A 590.115 64 - - - (590.000.00) (0.00) (63.13) 02 51) - - 130,766.58 - - - (10.757.27) (161.83) (1,048.71) 004.46) 118.694.30 iJ 1i 4.996,562.50 - (5.000.000.00) - 3.437.50 - - - 3999-12800 (4,000-00000) I088.89 (216.891 - - i 1347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 78573FQX0 SABMiIIer Holdings Inc. - 3.996.798.88 - (4.000,000.00) - 3.201.12 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax: Revenue Bond 65475MP95 Nissan Motor Acceptance Coma 3.998,368.00 - (4.000.000.00) 1,820.00 (188.00) :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 3703E IN87 General Mills Inc 6 649 361 60 - (6 650 000 00) 387.92 250.48 ,347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tar Revenue Bowl 25471KNM0 Drscovmmy Commoucations, LLC 3,999.128.00 (4,000,000.00) 1.044.44 (172.44) :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond 2574P I PQ9 Dominion Resources. Inc. 3.997.592.00 -- (4.000.000.00) 2.459.99 �51.99) - :347628 ,,,LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 69430MR65 Pacific Gas and Electric Compam - 3.198,833.79' 983.99 86.22 3 1.99904.00 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 27743KNC0 Eastman Chemical Company 6,499.135.50 (6.500.000.00) - 595.84 268.66 - Omnicom Capital Inc. Glencoe. Funding LLC '347628` LC-PF-2 Sales Tax` Revenue Bond 3133XCQE6 FHLB SD-20151 :347628 LC-PF-2 Sala Tax Revenue Bond I563W3PL2 Centrica PLC '.347628 LC-PF-2:Sales Tax Revalue Bond 61979KNM2 Motiva Enterprises LLC ,347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 28103BR61 Edison International - 3,498.506.66 347628 LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenuc Bond 27886MPD9 Ecolab Inc 347628. " ' LC-PF-2 Sales Tax Revenue Bond 27886MR62 Ecolab Inc. 3 998 172 00 2.9'38,933.32 63 (4 000,000 00) 1..260.01 2.150 00 900,01 (0.12.) 3.499766.55 - (322.00) - - 51.77 2.999.885.10 - i Page 8 of 23 Riverside Cott* mmeemlolion Commission STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Account Account Identifier Description Beginning Base .,.Market Value Base Purchases Ba,e Base Change In Brae Maturities Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Base Sales and Redent>Bons BasePardosns Gain/Loss eviction Gainit.oss Ending Base Alarket Y due Ending Accrued Income Balance 3470211 :$uhtot:d-31`62RL( PF-2Sle. to Res cnuc Road ,_.........._. ..._........... LC-PF-2 Sales Tas Res cnuc Bond 887e 137;54 347625 I( Frtle'et Fer^I' Semi-, Lien iM747C71.5 ............... 347625 LC -Project Fund Senior Lien 07588410„X7 317t:2� I.0 SPoieet Fund Se sir list 13145X1,54 347625 LC Proi.a Fund-2 Senior Lim 27743KPH7 357025 ( F en I-une 2 S , r I ran 1248( 3N50 sees, sees '347625 LC Proicct Fund-2 Scnior Lien 6:362P 3Q A.5 347625 1C Prolee, tul Sets tem 0351W(116 ,sees _ .. sees sees =347625 LC -Project Fund Senior Lien 2574P I0G0 .347625 I.C-Proiem Fam . Senior 2574PINE4J -3(767..5 LC Protect Fund Senior Lien 44S90N'045 347625 I C Project Funs Senior I. sett 3703L Pr -. sees... sees ............ 1347625 LC -Project Fund Senior Lien 885 138RE2 347625 I.C-Pimect Fund . S5n'or Licn iiS26M.TD3 347625 LC -Project Fund Scnior Lien 433571MR93 347625 _ LC -Project Fund Senior Lim 26244171673 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 20279WRS6 347625 L(-Prover Fut. Senior I_mn 0757:8V1P ) 317625 LC -Project Fund Senior Lien 077S7ON69 347(,25 1 f c e, Fund 2 Se trot: I ice 262441PK`i _sees.. sees.. i34762.5 LC Project Fund Scnior Lien 83700FP58 347625 I.( Project Fund Senior I cut 262441121 S '347625 LC -Project Fund Senior Lien 27743KR136 347625 I C-Project end S n er le t 34410NNC0 .347025 LC -Project Fund Seilior lien 57193USC1 �I7 -eels(. Proicct find: Senn I.. 89231NAC'7 r sees.. 34762.5 LC -Project Fund Scnior Lrcn S9231N \C7 312s25 I C-Project Fund S or Lim 600201.VPH 7 :34, 62.5 LCP sect Fund S vor Lien 37799B099 :rice; 4 LC -Protect Fun SOnior Limi N475 12tr?5ti ,_31765 LC -Project Fund Scnior Lien 27743RN63 31762.5 I( ( Protect Fund !Commr Ise t ,r(244814)59 347625 LC Project Fund Scnior Lien 816S5N1000 34792,5 14 I roleet_F Fund-2 Serum- 74432KR26 t _.. _ . .sees '347ob LC -Project Fund Senior Lien 'J 19'J6PT5 347625 1 ( I 'ojcct Ft t Swim Lien 13311/'91 sees .. sees '3476^_5 LC Project Fund Senior Lim 85572BNP5 347625 1_C. Pu ices i ear 1 . Ss t"or 1. ir 5531401C-1 i47625 LC-Proicm Fund Senior Lrcn - 3034X3N26 3.17(r;' LC-Isrimeal Fun i t 01 Llaa 1H1811i3PH7 ,... -347625 LC Projcm Fund Scnior Lien 0374IPNE8 151'e:4 E.('FLc. Scnior 1 Ism 341I0NQ94 7476:5 LC Protect Fund-2 Scnior Lien _ 43357NINL0 34'.L„5 LC (injc..t nand S Licit Ce^_ I A3(1114 34767.5 LC -Project Fund Senior Lion _ 34890NRP7 L175;y [f w rani Senior Iicn 9R417Fr)R6 Time Varner Cdblc Inc. MORGAN $"1A.141.FF' IJQ 1ST Becton. Dickinson and Company. (a Fad; t i ae' a Raiksm I rennet Eastman Chemical C mpum (BS(orpotet ion 1p(9)466 tNl National Grid L'SA - 4andinko Petrol . C R - r„ .,u:n Do mien Resource,. Inc _ 13ominicn Resontec.ic. It:e I, e) 71J ( I undar Capital 5tnerica - Cieueriii Mille. inns -- - -. Thomsen n Rvtcrs Corporal on - H t.r_h1 Cap:tal \r tenet Carp. Millie ':nc ,s Corpomosii 1 74, 14 un Commons, on's, milli Edison Compuns -. - B.:II Canada South C.. olma_Elms. 6: Gas Cr hrkcE lef',!e C dor: o r Easipjan.Chelninl Company I VI( C rpor nisVi Marriott Intemauonal. Inc_ t A(It201'_-1i 43 -- _ T\OT 2012-13:13 M1 telca. Comma0rncL lire. Glencorc Fundm, LLC Spectra EneTs Partners. IMP Eastman Chum cal Compam ONI OR P:11111,:l.S. L.P. Scmpra E cr<s Global Entcrprisc Prudential Fi a tc al Inc. sees... sees... sees.. \lotisa Enterprises LLC - Marnou International, Inc. 12991G9 (1n Stamoad Hotels & Resorts Worl 1.299.691.90 MMAF a11I2-AA:A3 2991"a9 FMC Technolopies Inc. 1999.922.00 Aetna Inc. 4pchc Corporation 1999696.Pi FNIC Cogioran„n - Hitachi Capital \mcrica Corp. 1999 552_00 tl ail Capital Inc - Hyundai Capita! America Nevus Corporation 2I9,281,746 4 10 05 5 933 29 1099 4%7.5S 1 999.1325.88 I999390.00_ 1 999.'66Z, 1 314,359.26 ;69,042,0112.141 i I I)1.819,594).6 I 0, 499.1.6s.5n 110,723 5F,t.71 311.819 56 19'TJ :34.WI 439,385.54`_ 96,665.49_ .1.999.846.00 1.998 72i(I0 09S 856.68 _ - 1 999 II I7.78 _ - 2 t10 - 1 999 562.22 - 1999_275.09 2, 249. i 90.89 12209.323.34 1.999.4111 ,00 1,908,103 34 2,099.165.84 1998.6711.01i I .999,0211.3e 1999.250.00 1.909.644 4.1 1 JAY 47556 1.999.095..56 I9,9 I « i N5' 1995.4702 199,.; L383+ 2.993 423.68 1.898.733)33 I: )99.24I 66.. :7825 f..0 Project Fund-2 Scnior Lien 85572BR71 Stara ood Hotels i Rcsonr wort • 1999.111.1'_ '117Y4,2 11 1 .61 Fun( Senior I cn �3779W374SO Glow o•e i i ling LI.C_ 1.999.89800 t Fund-2 _ _. _.. - -'S n IS o Lien 05634F?s 70 _ 8Jc_rd \I-rnini E.V. 1.999,82R.00 'JC•P e-i rued _ Sen558 i Jill i,197.*:R A4 MMIIVa Finarpr tiRs 1 I.(' 1.999.277.78 - ( (roicct Fund S nior Licn_ I3 (,'%\C743 C nadran N.au cal Rc 011,e5 Lim 1.799.201.00 L( F. f , l'ap _ Sir of I rcn 74.132KR �-4 P nrml Finano.3l. talc 1 999,144.44 .......... sees. ,47 )25 LCP icct Fund-2 Senior Lien _ 29380D(1+2 - Enterprise Products Operating LL 1.999.306.66 }l:+C' i( Pnie, _Fair Se for Lien 81685514F4 S p- Energj (global Entaprjse _l'J_4:i17 - _.._... sees._. .. sees .......... _ ' __".. . _ ......... ._. _. sees_. 317635 LCP Icd Fund-2Senior Lien 855 T_BCl-t9 Sunsaod Hntcis&Resorts Worl - I999.J45.00 1,42C15 I E 4ct Fun I S ... 3 _ 2,098973.33 For lien o.3 •:L1F H5 \ t I>ne_ Inc.sees.. sees.. sees.__... sees ....._.. - _ sees_.. ' _347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 28I03BN57 Edison International _ 1999:4602 - 3..rj2; IC ,e. 1-i1n Sni,a i.irn 5710311QW9 Marriott lntomatiortl. Ina --1.2'.9.2391' ... - 3476'S LC-Proicct Fund-2 Scrior Lien fi362P3N L4 National Grid L'S.4 1999.5%2.0n 347625 ( I leet ISnni S,. t s r i ice: _ 23384ERDI Daimler Finance Nardi America 1 - 1,998.792.7% .. sees. _.. sees..... _.......................... ......... 1347625 LC P ojcet ,Fund Senior Lien 08465SQBS Berkshire Hath s En rb -Com - 1.999.422.22 347715 1 ( Proget Fi S ror Licn 07787i;P44 Bell Camedn - _- 1.99942222 - sees_.. ....................__c..._......__... 34625 LC -Project Fund Scnior Lien 03741P054 Apache Corporation - 1.999.626.66 _epee .. _ _ _- 347M1L1 L( Pro3cct Fund S or Lien i,R2n51Li40 ONEOK Pantnt, l_ P ▪ ...._..., 1998.602.22 _ . _.- .. sees _ 347675 LC -Project Fund Senior Lrcn '-9380DRi7 Enterprise Products Operating L.l - 19990r334 ';4:'di-_ . LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lrc. _ _ 4:.3VAfPKO Hitachi Capita/ America a lie)]. , 2 U34 dIt(i 50 ._ sees.. sees.. .. sees.. 347h;=5 LC P o)cet,Fund Senior Lien 97689RAH7 WI HSG-VAR TXB B MFH 1.890.000 00 li7G� _ LCPrgcct, Fund-2 or Licn - li 3. IINI i AutoZonc. Inc I P)) 526.00._ - ... .. ....... .. sees..,. 347625 LC -Project FScnior Lien 27805 BNWI Eaton Corrpoiavon - 1993237775, . _... sees.. sees... ..,..._ -. __._ - _ 347625 - , . LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 65475MNGI Nissan Motor Acceptance Corpor 1: 99,65R 00 = _ ._ 3 '347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien U63W3QW7 Centrica PLC 1 3)9 24 S9 64 1183,475,101. M (4,41 539.45) (LI Ofl 000.00) 12.00, 000 (NI) C.000ant 00, (I345 000o (2. 000 000.00 , 2 001 y000 00, (1100(100.W 12.00 (*0.11ll 17.199.089 09, (2.u00.n011 0u ('_,25QA0J (i 000.000.001 Ei.1810f;(1o.onl (2.000 Ma) (101 (2.1881 I If 50.90) (6.300:000.00) - (553.'95) 216.67 218.83 66,696.78 8,016.66 _sees. ......._ ........ 512.42 .86L1; _--- 700.00 ._. R2'2 7L7R 733 34 640.74 1,075 o0 zzr,6;_ 1 143.3 740.0(1 G06(,; 882 Ao ._. 606.C' _ „0 00 900 nu 41.67 676.050 600.00 777 77 4 Sere 226 II 31.(,7 (22 215) (1.53) _ 979.44 750.00 355 56 97.22 524.44 90444 %I G 67 371 66 ndi 59 317 75 (51 :s) IS S9 528 sic 393.33 xo 160 453. S9.... 7j, 3' 796 34 758 34 7_'_ 2 - 155 Sic 46' 22 _ 799 00 693 34 58 96 555 un 513.34 6S.89 700 89 34834 933.89 577.78 577.78 373.34 41.11 sees... 766.66 913.50 . ".. sees.. _._........... (2,000. 419.nll) (2 000.000.00) (160,610..1n (35.334.24) (44.40� (3.08) (_n00,000.00). sees. ... . ( 000,000 00) 12,nono0nom (2mim.000. on) (I 11111.1 oo. o.0) (13(I(/.00n.0tn (1.390.000.001 j2-000.9185.00l (2n(111 999 001 I'_ 90u,0n0 90) ........ (2.000.0001nr, 12.1011 0I4(00l 12.909.000 sin( 1100111H1.00, (1.590(l00.90) 02299.14444) (2.0013000.001 1250.000 ant (2p00 000.01p - (2.0014000 00) 11200.000 00 ) (2.000.000.001 ,i'24A �34�r,i9 12.000 000 001 (2 nuu.000 001 ('2..:9I10 000 001 I a_ I0a,0011,(Ifl) (I :{(1(1 00{), 0(1) (2.1100 0011041 C2_000 000 ()ll t2!100 IHMI 00� Jeanie aa0.0o) (II8.789.10) ,04.37)„ 562.23 622.22 266.67 675 11 5v 1# ? 19.95 116.1I vk 78 7 8(1 21 .3I'hi 3'J.11�1 241 3 i 1713 (.6.'R1 5.5 75 ill 56j (75,10; see s. .... (9.68) (I 9S 37) 59.11 0.67 (35.89) 263.59 31).47 +64i 38 G7 148 GI 2.128,949.16 66,30.22 19.124.34 1,999,844,40 1999 885.00 1.999.897.50 1 999r711x.34 _099.FL_38 1 998 90S.00 278728.94 C 1320.37 I9JJ,9(!IPI I Sll 393.97 -_ i(y9H 12 53. tis rr 1899_700.26 I ))>8(53.80 . 1999.S%x )90 • 282.34 2 094769.(l0 65.11 69 G6 107.13 I, )99.833.80 7i.117 1999 511440 63.8S 1,999,863,88 _ (Nx 23 ) 75.33 i __ I Page 9 of 23 4=30 NM am= Riverside County Transportation Commission STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Account Account Identifier Description Beginning Base. Market Value Base Purchases Bascules Rase Base Change In Base Maturities Net Total Realized AmortizationiA Net Unrealized Ending Rase Ending Accreted and Redemptions Rase Paydown Gain/Loss ccretion Gain/loss Market Volta( "income Balance 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 60920WS43 :347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 37790BS 10 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 29380DP95 :347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Gen 68268UR66 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 1563W3PL2 .347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 347625 LC-ProjeetFund-2 Senior Licn .347625 LC -Project Fund-2Scnior Lien 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien .347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien' 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn ,347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior. Lien. . 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn .347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien Mondelez International, Inc Glcncorc Funding LLC Enterprise Products Operating Ll ONEOK Partners. L.P. Centrica PLC 20279WQ6I Commonwealth Edison Company 61979KNM2 Mot .° Enterprises LLC 78573FQX0 SABMiller Holdings Inc. 3703EIN87 General Mills. Inc 2547IKNM0 Discovery Communications. LLC 6116M3P92 Monsanto 13638XR77 Canadian Natural Resources Lim 1,999.564.00 1.999,808 00 1.999.564.00 1.499,249_16 2.098.880.01 1,999,150.00 1.998.702.22 1.998,625.00 1.999388 88 2.198.239.38 (2.000 000.00) (2,000.000.00) (2.000 000 00) g000 000 00IM (2200.000.00) (2 000.000.00) (2.000,000.00) (2.000,000.001 22.08 70.00 850 00 1.095.00 1,373.00 611.12 544.44 1 760 62 116.67 522.22 641 66 793.34 367.56 559.85 86,12 1499.638.80 2.099,509.86 1.999,883.34 _PRI .44) '75.33 - i"� J - 80.60 1.999,910.60 69430MR65 05634CP42 28103BR61 Pacific Gras and Electric Compare Bacardi U S A. Inc Edison International 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 27886MPD9 Ecolab Inc. .347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Lien 27886MR62 Ecolab Inc :347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 8873I1N54 Time Wamcr Cable Inc. 'Subtotal - 347625 LC -Project Fund-2 Senior Licn 1.999.086.00 1.999.866.00 ..... ......... ....._ 44,499,567.47 1,999,271.12 1.999.310 00 1,999.146.66 1.999,288 88 (2 000,000.00) (2.000.00O.00L_ (2.000.000.00) - ... ......... ......,........................................ ._ __ .-.__ .. .. ......- .. ........_.. .................. _. 126,899,812.71 (12,008b15.07) 4116.8•t5,000.00) (314,73351) (13IJ35) 46,820.84 4.i5A,36 42,281,848.96 614.99 53.89 1 999 940.00 690.00 720.01 _ (0,0a 1,999,866 vp 1,075 00 1161.00) - 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 61747C715 MORGAN STANLEY LIQ2RI1 110,484 97 3,138870-OR (3,145,714.39), :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 44890NNS5 Hyundai Capital America 1,099.707.40 T - (1.100.000.002 '347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 61746BDG8 MORGAN STANLEY 502.710.00 - . 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 2574PIRL8 Dominion Resources, Inc. - 299.81450 '347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 02580ECC5 AMERICAN EXPRESS BK FSE 278.690.00 - 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 313851LF3 FN 545826 236,829.54 - 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 48121CYK6 1P MORGAN CHASE BANK N 332.964.00 :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 3703EIPJ1 General Mills. Inc. - 1,099.593.00 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 88513BRE2 Thomson Reuters Corporation 999-581.11 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 263534BX6 E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS 957.894.50 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 262441NC9 -... Duke Enemy Corporation 1.099.853.70 :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 3137ASNH3 FHMS K019 AI 419,479.19 .347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 68268UPK7 ONEOK Partners. L.P. - 1347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund -I Interest 47787BAC9 JDOT 20I2-A A3 103,570.31 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 20279WP39 Commonwealth Edison Company 399.865.20 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 3137ANLP8 FHMS K501 A2 938,522.36 !347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 3136A4M89 FNA 2012-M32A1 192,378-17 !347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 3136A8G38 FNA 2012-MI3 ASQ2 840,597.18 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 65475MQW3 Nissan Motor Acceptance Comm 998.880.00 1299.54933 (1,100.000.00) (950,000.00) i 1,100 000.00) (1.3(10.000.00) (400.000.00) 600.01 34.51 L, 999,923.40 - 64.44 69.56 267.36 307 94 103.640.67 25.24 242.06 503 260.00 -........ - _ 119.00 26. 84 ... 299,96034 (2,222 74) 637.74 277.105 00 (36.436 75) , ...- _(1.714 5G).,.... ,. (958.24) 10680 197.826_.79 (2.383.80) 1 471 80 332.052 00 (I 1360 66) (103.54033) AS.th17.41) _._......................................._ 01.589431 11.000 000.00) - 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund -I Interest 233851AT1 DAIMLER FINANCE NA LLC- 1347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 57163URT5 Marriott International. Inc. - 899,475.00 :347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund -I Interest 94980VAF5 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 997.260.00 - :347623. LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1. Interest 481210M9 IP MORGAN CHASE BANK N 497.880.00 - 407.00 23111 109.e8 99.4922.20 _(7.745.73) (148.76) 11764 211.66 16834 875 00 710 0n 954 14 9,000 01) i 242.81 32352 3.616.78 412.301.63 450.67 (10.17) _ (4.26) 161.33 (21.5M (64.89) 51243 66451 928 89 :347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund -I Interest 61979KR14 Motiva Enterprises LLC • 1,099,332.66 .347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 407288YD5 HAMILTON SWR-B-REF 631,46160 T - + :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 44890NRG7 Hyundai Cancel America 599,436.00 - 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 38143USC6 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP Ib 615.636.00 - F :347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 2352191S2 DALLAS-B-REF-TXBL 657.150.00 - - :347623 T LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 37790BQP9 Glenicore Funding LLC - 1.199,466.67 (1,200-000.0(.0 (347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 172967FD8 CITIGROIIP INC 623050 36 - - 200.27 135.00 1,02957 i 1550) CIL,531_ 1.353.91 _ 938,949.23 1 84293 189.05516 3 457.49 .........793.642.17 191.11 289.73 8457 (519.57) 502.93 1282 63 299.51 820.75 5048)0.00 899.69I37;-. 1,3RR;89 997.770 00 611.71 15829 498,650.00-` 667.34 _ (6.16) 1.099,993.84 21420 631,67580., 444.85 25.82 599,906.66 (2.692.54) 111E14(2) 612,840'00:1 • 138.50 657.988.50 533,33 (4.83324) (895.381 617.321.74 .347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 05333URE2 Auto7_one, Inc. - 899.659.00 - 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 912828RX0 US TREASURY NB 953.562.51) :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 59217GAC3 MET LIFE GLOB FUNDING 1 750,604.20 - - :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 928670A17 VOLKSWAGEN INTL FM NV 601218.60 :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 78573FR76 SADWI _a_r Hoidi _m__c. 999.212.50 :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund -I Interest 37790BSI0 GLENCORE FUNDING LLC - 1 099.413.34 :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 89233P610 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CC 802.1(2.n0 _ - - - 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 38144LAB6 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP rr 333.795.U0 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 767201 AM8 RIO TINTO FIN USA LTD 611,310.00 :347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 36962G3H5 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 333.015.00 - i'347623 LC -Sr lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 3 1393 V2T7 FHA 2627 GY (6(000.02). 557.93 i IS$.3tti 1,686.307E -' 3.262501 1.319.75 i 10,693.83 139.50 121 4 8999195'4 2.J36 36136 .536.I4 956,460.00 2.089.61 i (2,949 41) 1 95.39) 747 259.40 102 711 (943.74) (274.86) 711..29 31.51 99995130"" . - 36.67 J325 1099.743.26 - (288.79) (167.21Z 801.29600 1438.89ai /11,314.28) 198.28 332.679.00 1.562.50 ; (LS i489) 1.114 89 611310.0 5458.33 _I (2.352.37) 273 051.26 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 31393EXC8 FNR 2003-88 TH 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 69349LAL2 PNC BANK NA '.347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 36162WACI GEET 2013-1 A3 .347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob fund-1 Interest 912828UA6 US TREASURY NB :347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interat 05565QCC0 BP CAPITAL MARKETS PLC 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Interest 6362P3P32 National Grid USA _ :347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund -I Interat 31402RBG3 FN 735439 - -_ ... _.._...___ 347623 LC -Sr Lien Ob Fund-1 Imera1 31402RBG3 FN 735439 :Subtotal - 347623 LC -Sr Licn Ob Fund-1 Interest 347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I 61747C7I5 MORGAN STANLEY LIQ_ PRIP 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31381 PESO FN 466430 53.212.11 - 499..219Siu - 902.890 99 1.233.915.00 296.731) 00 1,099,629.30 108.771.7% 8.4W 73 21,899.835.96 13,633,403.20 (32.347.M) (110.683 - (5.892.11) (247.14) (263146.47) 19(199 (I.I00.0006) - _.. (15.158.04) (1.17961) (3,145,714.39) (9,850000.00) (526,030.67) 11919646 _ _L1140,7832, _(1203870.22) 281,035.22 -65 1074.37 331.737.00 750.00 _ (685.58) 1359.61 242.009'80, 867.63`1 (133,40) 318.34 47,257.80 169.77 _ n.so (t�s.5o a99,9soolr ��"" 493137: 156.18.,. (446 33) 639.345 35 85.75 . 1.973.85 _..t.760.15 1.244.725:00" '.�-- 2,618:48:i 443.22 2;68i.78 299.859.00 1,6614G ........ .. .._� ._._.. 363.00 7 7U (787 i7),,.,....-_(315,57..) 11(1.74 92.621.79 443�.54 s a (5I 71) ,.,.._...., n (22_741 12G „ 720692 : 34.52' (3257.76),,..,..- (20,494.62) 30997.85 OIR,739,_,._Sij .._51,328_77 _ I 96,109.49 073.60, 3.740.35 284.201.0 7- 2 Page 10 of 23 ��111111111mI Riverside County Transom -lotion Commission STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Account Account Beginning Bake Identifier Description tYwi.ti 1 Are Base Purchases ...Baler Bass Change In Base Maturities Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued Base Sides and Redemptions Base Pardour+ Gain/Loss ccretton Gain/Loss Market Value Income Balance 1347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137EACA5 FREDDIE MAC 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 1 38376LE39 GNR 2011-104 BN _ 347621 LC -Sr Lien Rcscnc Fund-1 31395EZP5 FHR 2835 MD 337621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828WK2 US TREASURY FRN 347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 912828K 2 US TREASURY NB 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376G5B2 GNR 2011-120 AB ............. .347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I 31398V WCG FHA 3653 AT 347621. _ LC -Sr Lien Resme Fund-1 3128MMAK9 FG GI8009 347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3130A3BF0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANI 347621 _LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1,.. _ 31417YKF3...... FN MA0293 347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 3I294KZL2 FG E01647 347621 LC -Sr Lien Rixervc Fund-1 38377RVK8 GNR 2010-166 GP " 347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve F d-1 3136AEYG6 FNA 20 I3-M9 ASQ2 " 347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I 3I37ASNH3 . _ _ FHMS K019_AI 347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 31416YX12 FN AB3380 -347621 __ LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 383786X20 GNR 2012-132 AB,.,,,. .347621 LC -Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund 13136A7M1R FNA 2012-MR ASG2 347621 LC Sr Lien Rarnc Fund-1 3137EADB2 FREDDIE MAC 347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I 38377RSZ9 GNR 010-I G2 PQ, . 347621 _ LC Sr Lieu Reserve Fund" I 912828VB3 US TREASURY NB :347621 LC Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund-1 R70.680.00 3.189.17 144,329.00 149.959.50 533,010.00 I1D 13430 14.111.38 204.502.0 199.954.00 200.259.32 (3.207.77) 10.375.77 877,848.00 333.33 (3187.46)... . - . 000__ ___..-..... _. ._ (1.71) 4) (57001) - (28.90) 91.95 - 13110351,. 468.24 8.24 17.26 149,985.00 16.33 _. .__.... (I657.21) .6.53721 537.890.00 -_ 5913.33 (1.356.78)(874)_ _ (76.22) _- 14836.. ._ 101855.93 _ 202.21 (14.130.10) 18.72 ... .._. ... .. " - (16,822 ��tRl _(8fi5 7(1(._. _ , _ (681_30) -��_ 499.81 _ 186.632 33 _ 73293,. r'Ir:.Me. WI _.. (68.116) _..,.._.._..11486 " (11.43245).. (fi0G 89)(25466)___...._751.06, 188716.38649.13 62,638.81 " (��.39(1.26). _. ('+GR 121 (232.96) __,__ 143.G4 -G,780.R1 179.13 13999D.87 - (5.312.I81 i99J01 .,.. (92.3,7) _ .1.200.74.,._ 116365..662871.. 35687.47_ 326.67 171.479.19 _ (5.649.571 (317R1 _.(G2.8T��, I.L>1.43... I(G 62109 23992 _ 2 419479.19 _ (11.3Go.6(.)_.., 2072i 273.46 370239, St230163__, 502.93 77 055.93 - CA87.32) (H9.121 (139 RG) 582.38 75.322.02 .,._ 205.8R _ _ " 11244. GI - .__._ - (11..11). .11939._.. .7534$.10.... ..79.?3 - 175,052 ��R , - r (3.7116.501 38. LS 153.19 9R3.22 172 02033 217.03 555.659.50 - - 55916 12 S3G34_,_ 5G8755A0.; _ 2.R30.21_ - 99.469.49 (4647.071 (2R1231 (1497) (301>4) 94.224.67. 830.21 3.407.845.00_., �� -_5.708.35 '-G7581663481135.00 2318025 3137AUPE3 FHMS KU2l AZ 234,091.49 - - 36G.IR 4,3C9.U7 >3R R2G.74 469.22 .J47G2I-....LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I_. 3R378KX��V{._,__._....GNR 201.3-I05, A201.776.48 _ - (1795.4(,.)_. _ 3G0 6994 " 23996 _ 200299.53 2R605. ;34762I LC Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund -I 3I4I3XVG5 FN 9��ftRU _ I/.�_ 00 (921.G0) 2.3R7 (0 17.79R.(10 77G 03 .._ ._ ....__ . .............. � .0 .. .. ... 347621LC-Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 383,77DPX8. __GNR 2010-101 NC, 57602.50, -_ ((890.921_ i4528(1,401:,,)/18(1)))) (20830) 2063050495.3810410'347121-LC Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund-L3141RAFW3 FN MAIU80290,R1171(1788857)(25372)1,��24 >! 73C9299C>19C337/>21LC Sr Licn Resme Fund-I38378B6A2 GNR 2013-12 AB117��7 Ll.f7-(82G 9]G ll73 07 1,106 02 132 39737 222 04347G21 LC -Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund-1 3R37!>WAG2 GNR 20I0-15 PD - '.FI,Mno} - (9.412 341_ -- 2755. . _ 1.9G( !3 >IU,RG7.%4 !40 97 '347G21 LC -Sr Licn R,xcnc Fund-1 38376TSZI GNR_2010-4.PD..... ,1Y2#32 14 .7. _- (5.331 7G).. ��9971_..._ ,(I01.96), ...._(43S 60)_ 186 302.R8 447.10 j 347621 LC -Sr Licn Rcscnc Fund-1 3R��7711N20 GNR 2011-C2 PA 97.503.81 - - 434,W3.R31 _ U73 2R) (331.13) (R.73) >(27R1.R3 (3> GO .._.. .. ..... . _......._ 011- ..... .. ..... _._. 34762I LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I _ 38377UN20...,_. ..,,.GNR 2011-62 PA, 59.5007G, __ (480O.77) _(37!MD. .,_ (135.11) ..._37008 32557.37 12912.; :347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund" I 3137B6ZLR FHMS K714 A1. 55.122.0(1 - (_ 092.83)_, (33 05) (��0 88) 202 12 5 137.3E 90 32 : :347G21 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 . 38376GB33 GNR 2011-6_BA . .. _ _ 35lF36L'dO - (621 79) _. 1 269 31 359,910,37 I O>U 83. 347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve F nd-I 3137AEV77 FHMS K703 A2 _59.454.43 _ - (39927) _ 2.574.18 (1 C29.35 5C4 n4 ... _. ... _. _ ...._... .... ... .. 7 ...... __. 347621 LC -Sr Lien ResmeFugdl_. 3136A4M48 ._....... FNA 2012-M3..IA1 403,263.11 (11,860.07).(21.R9��_ (56.73) _5.377.74. _ 396,702.16_.. 6R023, :347621 LC -Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I 313921183 FNR 2003-17 HC 41.009.39 _ _ - (4.433.781 (16R.R3) _ _ (109.82) (105.05) 3(,,191911 144 66 I 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137A71U5.. FHMS K701_A2345 568.93......,.; .. _. ..(I.581.91)... 1,380 41__..._ 345 367.33 i 051.38 :347(21 LC -Sr Lc ReserveF nd I 3I403WTT3 FN 780962 116112.23 (1 L97(,.RG) ,0_83.c0) (577.00) GR0.03 103,155.10 361RI .347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912833KR0_.... STRIPS 363756.R0 - 1,32R.45 ._ 3.SG9.93 3G8,957.2P ;347621 LC-SrLien Rcscnc Fund-1 31397QUQ9 FNR 011-6 BA 154259.70 {IS 3R2.lrl) ��733.89) _ (47A94) (228)_ 137.5(>3,95 307.55 ')47621 LC -Sr Lieu Reserve Fund-1383771Z89 __.., GNR 2010.117 GK2(16788;86 _ i (12,6G630) _._._, (327.3T (t5589).. ___. _. _879.33 _,. 194538.G4_ _ 34305 1347G21 - LC -Sr Lien Reserve F d-1 .313REJGVS FN AL2G83...._.. _ IG3 a3G.7G �% (11.GR7.40) ��85.271 (8R.69) (8G9.72) 194.23250 470 0 ..... 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I _ ._3137AQT24 FHMS K708 A2 . 171 6(13.27 - _ - _ (67,93) 2.370 9D 173 906.26 U 175 . 1347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund -I .38379C2M7 GNR 2014-96 WA, 58,912.53 (1830.07) (RS 271 19.03 (829 3R) 56,176.85 73 10 347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fundl 912R28UF5 US TREASURY_N/B ._., - 8=591112 28.00 1,46763 94094.G5 26R.66 :347621 LC-SrLien Reserve Fund-1 38378T4F7 GNR 2013-71 GA ... 267.711.40 (G.o7G 4_) - 1 G(1,.. _ (1609).. _ S.IOR 9G 2(f 229.aG - ��37>3 347621 ..,_LC Sr Lien Reserve Fwd" I 91282RVK3 US TREASURY NB ,.. 3.506.825.00 803.14 _ 35.561 86 3.543.190.0(1 12 U97 72 : 1337621 LC Sr Licn ReserveFund-1 3I385XBG1 FN v5439 29.018.90 (4.000.121 (17713) (11824) 4930 4.772.70 1192E 337G21 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137B03W2 FHMS K{02 A2 43 182.60 (0.3 242.11 45 424a6 53 48 j _. ._. .... ..... .. 5 3I37A7E_> FHR 3804 DA 323909.G_ (34.251.63) _ (90005)(672.7D1.02E 27) _ R7 02893 804 R7 ; 317(21 ... LC -Sr Len Reserve Fund-1 > ..................__ _._ - -_._ . _ _ _ .- ._(.. 347621_ LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fwd-1.... 3135G01A2 FANNIE,MAE,......_,.._ _ 125,69750 (68.75) ._S02_50,. 126, 131.25... 611156'! 347621 LC-SrLen Reserve Fund-1 ... 3135G01A2 F.ANNIE MAE .. 35> S 1100 - _ _ ._. -... " - G5.73 1.495 77 334 072.50 2.165.63 347621 _ _ _LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 - _ 912828T19 US TREASURY NB ....._....,...... _ 559.277.20 _ al 4xk ]54  , ,  _ _ - 4 030 94 _ 865.45 6,260 41 491,015.25 _ 991 i '.347621 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 313 381 H24 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANI 530.015.9(1 _ : - - r53d,oduen��. (onol (1AS2J. (42RJ._ 501817.50 4M1.ORltats " t000 6R 063 347621 .. LC Sr lien ResmeFwd-1,.,._31338IH24 FEDERAI._HOME LOAN BANI __.. - - �� )..-(.....71..._.. .. (. )..- --. i347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund -I 9I2828UAG US TREASURY NB 13R 06,32 - - - _ - 205.85 997 03 139 309.20 >93 27 347621 .._LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136A72D3.,.,, .,.._FNA2012-M9 A2,..., 394,301.25 - ___ 501.56 .__7,32484._ 402327.65__._ 81699. 347621 LCS Lien Reserve Fu d-I 3134G>EK7 FREDDIE MAC _ _ 200 050.00 - - (27 RO) (4R 21 199 974.00 2GC f7 347621 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fwd-1...._ 38378CRT6 GNR 2012-13 EG 135 292.67..... _ - _ , _ (5..054.55) _ 169 72 63 99 1,6R6 RB 132 I58J1 220.88 347621 LC Sr Licn Reserve Fund-1 31394DVM9 FNR 2005-43 PB __6.377.59 - - - (12.232 83) (620.24) _ (841 36) 433 0l 213 I_G 16 850 SG ',_Subtotal .3476,.1 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 1_ ....._,. _...._._ ...... ... IR JIO SE19.97.... 2,656A/t.J3., .. _(1.283.338.971 03g.,po0.00),., (314,617.11) _ ,-.(5,39451)._^ .(4,194.04) ��19A,TR2.47, 18,678,60923 .., .,...._,67 75.94 i :205091001 LC-2013 ACapitalized intttesF 9AMMF0562 U.S.Bank, Money Market Accow 213.606.86 L221,71782 (1 Il%4529.7G)_.... - - 3511,R24.92 __ . 205091001 LC 2013 ACa talized Interest _ 38376GWZ9 GNR 2010-141 A 1.319.749.87 _ - - G4,7R3341 �� ��24.R/> (I69 GS) 512.��0) 1.264,709.b 1.961.45 __...__.._.. 4! ._._ __. 205091001. LC-2013ACpitalized interest ._313384FM6 FED HOME LN DISCOUNT Nl,. .,.,_. - 674.912.34 - 2231 3t60. __ 674966.25 20509100/ LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 912828WK2 US TREASURY FRN 11.49C 895 00 - (9,998.771 .0 62 51G CR _ _ 1.437.47 _ 11.482(.851.00 1,251.16 '.;205091001. LC2013.A Capttaiizcd Interest 78008K5V1...-,,., ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, ........ 2053.560 (N1,. _ _,(8,923.99) (I .17�,Ol) 043,4G(100 R75 0! 2 25 0 ;20509I001 LC 20t3 A Capitalized Interest 31392FPPG FNR 2002-74 PE 243,126.97 _ - (32.098 72) (1 307 07) 705 4 (38�� 2R) 208.630.44 %37 0 .. ._._. _ ��. ..._ _._ :205091001 LC2013 ACapitat�ed Interest .64966_H4E7�� NYCTAXABLE-C I22R,10220 - .....,,.. ...,, ,.__ ,... .._._ __ ��, ___,,, ., ._,,,,,,(3;967.58) 8,706.08 1,232 R40711 _- IR 36900; 205091001 LC 2013 A 'Capitalized Interest 3128PHVS7 _ FG 306025 1132.498.47 - - 112,837.18) (517.74) (37G 1 22299 l0R 99(1.37 ....... 33 24 2t1 091001_ ...._LC-2013 A Capitatimd Interest 31392F6C6 FNR 2002-77 CB375 8(16 8s..., - _ (48,647.01) (2.042.49) (1,079:70) (596.63) 323 441.02 1 296 4i 20509/001 LC2013 A Capvaiizod Intent 90327QCW7 USAA CAPITAL CORP 4,090.920,00 - - - (1 ��.519 14,11985 4323.44002 250.00. :205091001 _. LC-2013 ACapitalnsd Interest _ 31392BVM5 FNR 2002.3 PG .. III 115.75 _ _ - -  , (,22,002.tg).., _ _,,, j69S.53) .... (405.98)._ (47)9) ,  87 96,142 _ 392 SR 205091001 LC-2013 A CaNtalized Interest 3137ANLPR FHMS K501 A2 3 Ifg,357 80 66 - (3,OG0 24) 4,472.44 3,103.770.00 4,234 03 Page 11 of 23 CND !M=m_ Riverside County Transportation Commission STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2015 Source Account Account Beginning Base .,....Identifier fls7.71GIVEl Ma.gtet.Value Elide lure t d.:• Base Sales Bast Base Change In Base Maturities Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued and Redemptions Base Pm' downs Gain/Loss ccretion Gain/Loss Market. Value Income Balance 205091001 LC-2013 ACdpitali4ed Interest 3128ID1BTHo I G G13052 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 912828SU5 US TREASURY NIB 20509I O0I _ L< 2013 .A Capitalized Interest _ 3136A4N189 I N A 201.1-N43 ^_ AI 205091001 LC _013 A Capitalized Interest 313618G38 FN. 201 -N113 AS02 205091001_LC 2013 A Capital zed Interest 3I 4lopi)(67 EN )388927 2(15091001 LC-2013 :\ Capitalized Interest 18412(1YS3 CLAYTON CO WTR-B-REF 205001001 IC 201 3 A Capitalized Interest 3 I28p(:L}'7 FG 1(14843 205091001 LC ^_n13.a Cap'nhzed Interest 36290R'H47 GN 619551 205091(101 _ L( 013\C.apodlzed Israel 9121281dU6 US IREASURY NB _ 2(51 0910(1I _ LC 2013 ACapl lued Interest 407288YD5 HANIILTON SRR-B-REF 20 U 110 01 LC 013 A Capittilized l meresd 3I 3_'1.1()K7 _ F61,50010 A 205091(101 ----LC 7013 Capital zed Interest - - 3140I NIN'C I FN 712643 205091001 _ LC 31}13 A CdapitaliCed illIC1,1 7.. 128GNR59 FG ES5908 '.'205091001 LC-2013ACarttalizedInterest 89153A'AC3 TOTAL CAPIT:ALINTL,S,A 24 O''10W C 2013 AC:pttaliz.tt htteres.i _ 2352191S2 INALLAS-L3•12E11-I-X BL W050911101 LC-2013 1, Capit zed Interest 362110 kFG9 GN 595167 2050010(11 1C-2013 A('aplla,It lftereTs 89113(_3 '3E8 IcAtoNTO-D(),m INION` BANK 205091001 LC2013 A Capitalized Interest 912828.VG2 US TREASURY N:B 205001001 LC-2013 1 C'apiolized nen:, 3129:1,11L0 FG E0/240 17(151)91001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 822582AC6 SHELL INTERNATIONAL. FN 2.4691601 LC-2013 A C_apltnli>tt hod t:t 3128114Nlio 1.GE96700 12 LC _013 A Capitali,d Interest 44328NIAL8 HSBC BANK PLC I55�54 32 626254,83 2,777,711.36 200,525.57 772.356.20 80 020,69 9 ,351.52 1_3 3.515.330.os 08> 491.70 241 861 12 995,194.63 7a.1c84.66 160.545.60 !,163,374 1 d 69.770.5e 767.370310 3.003.900.00 483.83 434,244.00 122,433.16 1 032,490.00 203001001 ! C 2,113 1 6)piti)lized l lcrest 44328NIAL8 HCBC BANK. PLC 2 710.286.25 205091001 _Ie ^_013 A Capitalized Interest 59217GA121 NIET LIFE GLOB FUNDING I 347.88395 101C091091 1 G _n 13 { Ca) 7ltzed 1049361 9128 8SY7 US 1 RI NSURY N+B 3 877 770.00 1205091001 LC 1113 A Ca/39:111,d Interest 31392HR'L3 FNR 2003-3 BC ,_ 57,002.77 ;ndll ili I( IIi A(; spileltzed interest 313(.\C0132 fN\-III:-N{3 AS(52 167655ti.54 205191001 LC _013.A Capitalizedintc,.r,est, 89233P610 TOYOTA NIOTOR CREDIT CC 5,013.450.00 2050` 1001 I ( 913 A (,..pirtehzert l Here l 31407.(J68 i t. 17S(173 382.IS1.47 12(15(191001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest (137833 3E7 APPLE INC 000,030.00 7050911 0I C 013 's Ctipaellzed Inter, 2718173.'8 PRO/CT( d` (15,(I311E (.'.Ui 1T8 1 54.396.40 1205091001 LC 21113 \ Capitalized Interest 31393\'2T7 FHR 2627 GY - - 905.591 56 -10 091001 1C 2913 \C.y3 11 1'metes( 45921 (IX3 I13N1 CORD 413,751.30 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 31393EXC8 FJR 003-88 TH 480 570.91 ?i1,0' It 01 I ( [ 1 , A Ctp t 11 zeJ Interest 3133841 3 n _I CD HON11Z llh DISCO( V3 )9') 65b 00 _sees _ 205161001 LC ^_013 \ Cap t I zed Interest 313384E326 FED HONIE LN DISCOUNT N7 424,851.25 _`050910dr_ I.(' 2113 AC,t1 t Ized Inter_, 9128813A6 US NW _.__. I 27582. 50 _. sees.. _. . 205091001 LC 20I3 A Capitalized Interest 31402RBG3 FN 735439 16.633. 19 209f•111131 I C 1113 .A Ctrpi)41.ized Interest 3.140.21213LI3 I N 7.3.58131 356 7814.37 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Intcrost 31402RBG3 FN T5439 .. .......... ._ ........ . _. sees iSulttt(1a1 2051e)11101 1.C-2013 ), Capitalized Intcm'I 7751037 71.486,173.04-- (16,535.09/ (70.19J (211.23) sees 5,9')B 65_ „(170,300.611 1691.58 _ 2193.58 11.418.64 (27 )02.75) (I 31^_.81/ (793.65) 143.99 916.09 3.12641 (29594.04) .- !J 348'i ... (932.81) 4132.33 2216.717.09) _(10.541.661 t^^_4072) 228.40 8 241 60 (624 001.. ( 1 374.65) (1 35631)_ (742.49) _ _ 511 71 (66.715_79) (2,916.941 (3,269 511 938.04T _,- IYs4,060.511 (2129.11) f1 U76.93) 3) 28 sees. _.. _....... -, sees. - - 13861 1-11099 16.546-.50 J_', 221 (397.021 '_72.41 137.831.00 546.60 sees.., __ .. sees.. - - (298.17) (73 83) 41111 128.11(1 7,ti 91 615,436.98 ) 4139 , I 1460.35 _ 820.64 77398.7(1 4 170 83� ( 249 032 69 _ NY^ 75.. 1 (170.584.80 3.33C,49 ._ . 23.S(I0.00 111.2(4 42 I184.867.20 56747 211Y'J 29.38 11,18 Lilt J 3.^_30-43 l 30175 - '_12.115.34_ 1.036. 16 161 795.20 _ 640.67 - _ (y] 5,c5 1(l6')7o 433488 _ - - - _ __ _. sees (9769245 (455.74) (154.2.51 «130.19) 58-761_I1 _5992 . _ .__ - sees.. .- - - (1.996111 3.676. 2') 7.9,05000 8015,63 - - 2,222.69 2.077_31 5.008.20000 :348.9(1 (37080)71 (L.238 s9j i.97I.717 _ i.: 00.) I80, 143.?$ 75.8 3332A11 ^_.34441 433,256.00 52000 Q3.570.(13L S184.14) (14+361 2.5,39 108.160.30 428.92 (4,424.04) (1,515.961 1026.55000 1(1'J26_11 .9.735.821 7.t5'_.68.3 2,694 69.3 73 28.707 29 L(1,147. 81 C46.171546.689.50 2_67.72 4 518. V'' !8 023.58 3.900 112 00 8 169.64 (6.728.63) (260.5R) 650.343 (195.601 49 667.61 198.61.. (233.17485) (197.23) dmiSCi ft 63511 114 r¢ h13' I' (1,804.911 (1545.091 5 008.100.00 4 903 06 - - (47.114.60) (2.888.47) (1327. 51 608 26 . _ 1.._ _.. L `7637 (75.453 1.335..15 3.001.2.9(717(1 1.439.73 - lx287.0<j 183179.0 1.24,'93.2() e 17.14 (106 503.41) (4.503.031 (2 257.231 _ 4.475.67 _ 796B03.56 85G.64 (I 062.66); AM 41 473 449.05 1 .737.91 (53.029.03) _ r2,2212�1_ (1.200.57)_ _=865.64 _ 426982.69_ 37495 Q64.b5J 999940.00 -. 2.697,160.16 11,094,528.531 15935 _ y/36. 10i 124.974.50 - 2.763.3..4 1"69.1L 1.-4261, 00 3_ti15147I (231794) (.116+77) (47051 12.13 14, 163.57 6782�. (49,720.73) _.52... t 1.C34 96) 363 -24 31 -,813 .90 1 4,4 87 (3.83375) All Or) (7392) 4.II 23.435.74 11218 .. ______.. .. -(1.372.134.9A (38.tSd71) L59,Udi.tlB) 1n1......0 ?1.734236.9t 1`)0533.06 267,019.671.15 365,168,984.04 0r.474.229.10) (311.150,000.00) (7,069,055.64) (47.488.78) 29,784.08 352.718.14 236.830.383.89 338.430.46 67 Page 12 of 23 Riverside Count{ Transportation Commission STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2015 ATTACHMENT 5 Money Masan PanMe (020M) Asset Class Mated Imam* (06668a) C^.x^ cmIcrumlml W. Ban.) Mmayt Yuesa.e L�xsxc Omer i3:.72ev4 Banta (s.9) Pipeanes iZ9m k) Industry Group wnerelan 06.I219%) .. OSMoasctpals 19.531,4 Etecato 49,71,4 1 .auto McMxlurara (s.veax.) 'ConmmsrcMI Male 0.5Ei�;; Omer (6.106.) PHLMC (MO 0.106%) vtatm 1a252%) PNMACMO MJNI (6276,0 �--„ COMP (13.026%) OS BOV (16 — CP (116.2811,1)) f IMPEEINIVMM Ome (1.425% I Agency (Ilan)) Municipal Fleuadd 00.799%) Mortgage sawme (11..9D]%! Govam:men, (te.lAYtd j- e.a,wat 'LLS-Z" ) cm. (taste%) Llaa)..u_mo4 Ilan oaau W,) . 68 Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTACHMENT 6 STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Senior Lien Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2015 Cash 12.0ti1-1 lGroup. NotNl (.266%1 — AutollanuheYnrwc (6223%) 1.6621119 W.+ur+N r)cshic ;106.2 • Sc�urig Type' CASH (0.0%1 MEIFUND (0.152%) ABS 11231%1 CP 0(4.612%) ChaS ssahhimau tar Oafs taming Was a. Acoiny err" WINK Aiwl 6464141 i.n+v Iw641414 L6,616 5 iN•WiLr itr rF, ••• U1im1 wS- 69 Mmi • Riverside County Transportation Commission STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2015 ATTACHMENT 7 Ic cto9,aa w a,.a a+t .ks�rt Class . qmb. as.0y_ babe Uri.* Va.. a',awed Industry Group US Mun.pa91 09.505%i Othrf Mawr.. Finn Sera ({$51141 thermals (7,069'14 ioctric (18.Oi9•..1 e.ad9lrq o.9s9%) }. — auto uarnnxcturora 4%1 Pipelines i9.288%, " caSY p.0%) B1kIFUND marks otn. ciao (O.183'41 aas (1.80516) MUNI t036141.v V11IX1 (10.1{5%1 CT 78.{{T:) ,Z Market.$ector Cads (0.078%1 - 4brtpa9eBeckad (0103.4 "'rl Meet Backed CI 805%i Financial (4.85114) MuniGp! (39.50546) -ate w9ry (31.16396) 70 BM Nam — Riverside County Transportation Commission STAMP Portfolio Series A 8t Series B Reserve Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2015 ATTACHMENT 8 S!� rsBae%) F19.Mc (a.tyr.l FNMA CMG (5.149%) FNLUC CMO (8.28014 FNMA (10,061 COMA CMO (11.62%) AGGY BOND {11.9' "1 C, • _Industry Group _ Cass 10.91'1.1 FGLMCCo0alond (P35514 A6oncY Coiiet OlO j8b1aL� Allen, Court FAC ciao (8.567% ) FtiVACOHHefatl (7.051.K) t tbere meebl a65 410 0'3 r UBGOV (47.216) Cass (0.51%) - AaF•Icy (11.911•L) Coerement .0210 obrta.a.Baaekiid 71 Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTACHMENT 9 STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Project Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2015 71V TA00.000 — 9.000.000 .. .000.000 WM Cash T N Money taarket Fends (0.471.) — - --- Fixed ig9.S20%) Oti+ It.IPII<] Ass (2y9Ted �1 FNMA CMO i4.671%) MUNI (5.95E16)'-' ...AMC CIAO (7.23B%) US COY (99Se% CY f11.256%) OilAAee 01.3.5%1 • • Steele : Cortonercni USD ivh-lifFS4 "- Sovereign `- Ade, Menerectoren ri rigTX1 _ _4_,•-hoe • --ma CORP TT:2,5,i J44Lk0L SCotor Other (0.111l.i Aseee Backed t2997K1 Munivdtei I`S56%) thrifty 7.]1>d%) "k Oovemment ,n: iSO'S) - Mortgags Becked (ISSYh) •-- inwrrml !?AiL[_iter 1'kwrM 2] tA'V S s.�tieaz er mt=hr —J 72 IMME®� Riverside County Transportation Commission STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2015 ATTACHMENT 10 Cek. Nauru 50<(w6.000 30,003,000 20,000.000 roJA. uer, Leah (0.03%1 Mangy...Met Funds (0.e67x) -, 11111, L Fixed Maome (90.37%) C.n..1a54.,,,,:!+1araN Valve.. waxnc Dews tbtl Firm Sery [5.68556.1 _ wuto Martu/acturors (6.MiC61 — - u6 11.1-11 N115.0.5424t HaMm 19,174,, Commercial MSS (12.5P,.:) Market S,ector.. 0Mor Milky (0.828%) -_• w25057 t2.918%) AuniapM (a.,42%) FlotrMef (15,521'%) L Wori9aae flocked • 73 ROTC ATTACHMENT 11 Riverside County Ironsportofion Commission Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio by Investment Category for Quarter ended March 31, 2015 Account Number: 001050990415 CUSIP Security Type Category Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Issuer Next Cali Base Market Final Matu Trade Date Date Original Cost Value Unrealized Accrued Gain/loss Income Credit Coupon- Yield RaLi" g 161571GS7 Asset -Backed 17305EFN0 _ Asset -Backed 36159LCN4 Asset -Backed 47787UAB9 Asset -Backed 47787VA05 Asset -Backed 89236VAC4 Asset -Backed 92867VAB6 Asset -Backed 31846V203 Cash 037833AG5 Credit 037833AH3 Credit 06406HCK3 Credit 084664CD1 Credit 0846708HO _ Credit 166764AK6 Credit 166764AV2 Credit 17275RAS1 Credit 17304UD31 Credit 19416QDU1 Credit 263901AE0 _ Credit 30231GAL6 Credit 36962G2G8 36962G3H5 459200HZ7 58933YAH8 717081DD2 717081DP5 90331 HMD2 Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit CHASE ISSUANCE TRUS 0 5456 k 2/18/20 CITIBANK CREDIT CARD 1.020/ 2/22/19 GE DEALER FLOORPLA 0.64687 / 10/20/19 JOHN DEERE OWNER 0.870 % 2/15/18 JOHN DEERE OWNER 0920% 4r16/18 TOYOTA AUTO REC 0 890 % 7/17/17 _ VOLKSWAGEN AUTO 0.870% 6/20/17 FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND_CL Y _ APPLE INC 0 49751 % 5/03/18 APPLE INC 0.450% 5/03/16 BANK OF NY MTN 0.7036 / 3/D6/18 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 0.541% 1/12/18 BERKSHIREHATHAWAY 1.550% 2/09/18 CHEVRON CORP 0 65341 % 11/15/17 CHEVRON CORP 1.365% 3/02/18 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.5146% 3/03/17 CITIBANK NA NE C 0.25449 % 4/09/1.5 COLGATE PALM MTN 2.625 % 5/01/17 DUKE ENERGY INDIAN 0.59197 % 7/11/16 EXXON MOBIL 1.305% 3/06/18 GEN ELEC CAP CRP MTN 5.400% 2/15/17 GEN ELEC CAP CRP MTN 5.625 % 9/15/17 IBM COPP 1.725% 2/06/18 . -. . MERCK CO INC 05921% 5/18/18 02/18/2020 _ 03/13/2015 02/22/2019 03/05/2014 10/20/2019 10/21 /2014 02/15/2018 03/11/2015 04/16/2018 04/09/2014 07/17/2017 09/18/2013 750,468.75 750,007.50 (461.25) 530.83 0.500 698,523.44 700,399.00 1,875.56 986.61 1.020 750,585.94 749,632.50 (95'3.44) 950.00 5.400 489,968.44 490,490.00 521.56 903'83 0.920 749,794.92 750,960.00 1,165.08 1,900.69 _0.620 709,886.25 710,481.81 595.56 236.83 0.480 06/20/2017 03/05/2015 05/03/2018 05/03/2016 03/06/2018 --01/12/2018 PFIZER INC 0900% 1/15/17 PFIZER INC 0.41116% 5/15/17 US BANK NA MTN 0 56815 % 1/30/17 90331HMQ3 Credit US BANK NA MTN 1.350% 1/26/18 9311420E0 Credit WAL MART STORES INC 0.600% 4/11/16 94974BFK1 Credit WELLS FARGO MTN 0.8871% 4/23/18 94974BFW5 Credit WELLS FARGO COMPANY 1.150% 6/02/17 FNMA GTD R_EMIC_ 0.3845 % 9/25/18 _ CALIFORNIA ST VAR 1.050% 2/01/16 3136AMTM1 Mortgage -Backed 13063BN73 Taxable Muni - 702282NA8 Taxable Muni 91412GW1J5 Taxable Muni 91412GWV3 Taxable Muni 912828D64_Treasuries 912828D98 Treasuries 912828F88 Treasuries 912828G20 Treasuries 912828H/8 _ Treasuries 912828SS0 Treasuries 912828UR9 Treasuries 912828WQ9 Treasuries 912828WT3 Treasuries .......... 05/03/2013 05/03/2013 03/06/2013 01/15/2015 02/09/2018 02/11/2013 11/15/2017 11/18/2014 03/02/2018 03/03/2015 03/03/2017 03/03/2014 04/09/2015 /0/09/2014 05/01/2017 05/04/2011 07/11/2016 07/11/2013_ 03/06/2018 03/06/2015 02/15/2017 02/13/2007 09/15/2017 09/24/2007 02/06/2018 02/00/2015 05/18/2018 05/20/2013 01/15/2017 06/03/2013 05/15/2017 05/15/2014 01/30/2017 01/30/2014 12/30/2016 01/26/2018 _01/27/2015 12/26/2017 04/11/2016 04/T1/2013 04/23/2018 04/23/2013 06/02/2017 06/03/2014 09/25/2018 03/01/2015 02/01/2016 03/27/2013 PASADENA CA UNIF SCH 0.541 % 11/01/15 LINN CALIFORNIA CA 1.418% 5/15/18 UNIV OF CA 2.003% 5/15/19 U S TREASURY NT 0.500% 8/31/16 U S TREASURY NT 1.000 % 9/15/17 U S TREASURY NT 0 375 % 10/31/16 U S TREASURY NT 0.875% 11/15/17 U STREASURY NT 0.500% 1/31/17 U S TREASURY NT 0.875% 4/30/17 U S TREASURY NT 0.750 % 2/28/18 U S TREASURY NT 0.500% 6/30/16 - U S TREASURY NT 0.875% 7/15/17 11/01/2015 05/15/2018 05/15/2019 08/31/2016 09/15/2017 10/31/2016 11/15/2017 01/31/2017 04/30/2017 02/28/2018 06/30/2016 07/15/2017 03/20/2014 03/25/2015 03/25/2015 09/02/2014 09/15/2014 10/31/2014 11/15/2014 02/02/2015 04/30/2012 02/28/2013 06/30/2014 07/15/2014 249,753_91 250,165.00 411.09 9,111.60 0.600 976,404.89 976,404.89 - 518.09 0.630 250,720.00 250,685. 00 (35.00) 98.35 0. 500 500,215.00 500,110.00 (105.00) 925.00 0.450 751,365.00 750,225.06 (1,140.00) 190.93 0.700 250,645..00 250,410.00 (235.00) 381.12 0.550 504,330.00 506 080.00 250,150.00 250,117.50 499 970.00 502,435.00 752,387.25 752,370.00 500,022.36 _ 500,000.00 523,124.45 523,705.20 751,022,50 750,757.50 1,750.00 (32.50) 2, 4'65.00 (17.25) (22.36) 580.75 (265.00) 460,000.00 462, 649.60 2,649.60 1 12, 850.40 112,546 68 554,590.00 552,895.00 497 700.00 498,765.00 752,800.00 752.310.00 501450.00 501160.00 250,017.50 249,985.00 250,192.50 250,080.00 500,990.00 501,950.00 319,615.67 319,634.81 502.870.00 503,165.00 500,520 AD _ 499,850 00 499,871.85 500,705.00 (304.72). (1,695.00) 1,065 00 (490.00) 292.02 310.90 80.18 5,523.44 416.88 717.60 1,250.00 119.41 1,200.00 205.45 812.79 _ (290.02). 773.50 (32.50) 145.48 _(112.50) 306.67 960.00 280.45 0.546 1.018 ............. 0.647 0.869 0.919 0.888 . ........_ 0.869 0.006 0.496 0.450 0.703 0.539 1.55Q 1,535 0.430 0.653 1.370 _..._-1.362 0.540 0.513 0.260 D.254 2.630 2.538 0.600 0.591 1.310 1.301 5.630 5.011 1.130 5.102 0.870 1.128 0.540 0.589 0.410 0.890 1.350 0.500 19.44 1,837.02 _ 295.00 9,901.28� L70 0.01_ _ 2,291.30 833.15 859.38 502,860.00 502,545.00 425 437.75 425,157.25 250 000.00 252,347.50 250,000.00 253,360.00 5,004,882.81 5,006,250.00 4,972,787.50 4,994,124.80 (31500) 1,1/9.44 (280.50) 196.33 2,347.50 3,360.00 1,367.19 21,337.30 4,991,406.25 _4,993,750.00 2,982,875.39 2,997,953 40 4,992,871.09� 5,000,400.00 2,487,653.13 2,494,136.00 2, 992, 395.31 3, 010, 0 94.40 2503,710.94 2,504,100.00 1 003 828.13 1,005 000.00 2, 343.75 0.890 1.150 0.898 0.411 0.507 1.348 0.599 0.879 1.149 0.380 0.384 1.050 1.047 0.900 0.541 .................... . 2,1'73.91 2 000 1.407 1,969.57 0.870 1.998 66.46 1.000 0.500 875.00 0.380 0.995 958.02 0.880 0.376 15,078.01 59.08 0.500 0.875 7,528.91 83.46 0.880 0.501 6.482.87 165.55 0.750 0.871 17.699.09 7,872.93 0.500 0.754 389.06 4.005.52 0.880 0.499 1,171.87 3.142.27 1.420 0.872 49,973,514.32 50,060,349.34 86,835.02 66,745.17 AAA AAA' N/A, N/A; _ N/A: AAA: N/Ai AA+ AA+ A+' AA AA AA AA' AA N/A A'. AAA AA+ AA+ AA - AA: AAI AA AA=_ AA-, AA'. A+j A+i N/A A+ A+: AA!. AAI _ N/A N/A' i N/A! N/A N/A N/Ai N/As N/A I N/Ai 74 Riverside County Transportation Commission Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2015 ATTACHMENT 12 Account Number: 001050990415 Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Transaction Settlement Date Trade Date Date COSIP Description Short Term Long Term Miscellaneous Federal Tax Cost Gain/Loss Gain/Loss units Price Corm ie'Ions SECFws Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Amount Amount 02262015 CASH RECEIPT I YC akzNu'rnNE,*, 02/272015 02272015 02272015 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y RORC'HAJED PAR VALUE UhOb TREASURY N I 'I MX% gr15'71 / /WELLS FARGO SECURITIES. LLC/4,960,000 PAR VALUE AT 02272015 02262015 02272015 912828D98 100.2578125 30,030,963.5600 1.000000 4, 96 E000.0090 1.002578 PAID AC:CRUEL) IN I tkES I -ON YURCHAZEUF if S TKEAGORY N I� 0227/2015 02272015 912828098 1.000% 9/15/17 ' --' -__-- HURLHASEU PAR VALUE Ur US IREASURY NI ""0:b/S%11/1b/1/'- /JPMORGAN CHASE BANK/RES SECURI/4,990,000 PAR VALUE AT 02272015 02262015 02272015 912828G20 99.76171884 % 4,990.000.0000_ 0.997617 "� PAID ACCRUED IN I ERES I UR-PURCHASE Uh U S I KEASUkY N I 02/27/2016 02272015 912828G20 0.875%11/15/17 HUHI.HAJEU PAN VALUE UI- D S"1'REAEURY N I U: SUU I° 1/31/'I / BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN2,500.000 PAR VALUE AT 02272015 0226/2015 02/2720t5 952828H78 99.7773436 % ER;:lb 11.gCM 0.997773 - PAIU ACCRUED IN I EKES I UN PUKUHASt Uh U S I KEASUKY N I 10227/2015 0227/2015 912828H78 0.500% 1/31/17 -"' - - - PUHUHASEU PAR VALUE OF U'J I'REASUR'V NI--U:b/Si°4/3UH/' - /JPMORGAN CHASE BANK/RBS SECURI2,480,000 PAR VALUE AT 02272015 02262015 02272015 912828SS0 100.308593959, _ 2,4_8_0,000.0000 1.003086 - -{PAIL) ACCRUEL, IN I tRES I UN PURCHASE Oh U S I KEASUKY N I 02272015 02272015 912828SS0 0.875% 4/30/17 - ` YURCHAS'EL"1-RAR VALU[ OF U J 1 REASURY N I - U./SU% 2/28/)et /BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN/5,020,000 PAR VALUE AT 02272015 02262015 02/272015 912828UR9 99.08593745 % 5,020,000.0000 0.990859 - _... _..,-. -. PAID ACCRUtU IN I EKES f ON PURCHASE UI- U S I KEASLIRY NI -' 50,000,000.00 (30,030,963.56) 02272015 02272015 912828UR9 0750% 228/18 03/022015 03/022015 03/022015 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOUT OBLIG FUND CL Y 18,825.0000 1.000000 ....._.... _- .._..--... .._...IN I EKES I EARNEU ON 1-IRS`1-ADERGUVralLUFOND CUT UM l_tor--..__.... _ ., _... 03/02/2015 31846V203 0.0000 SHARES DUE 2282015 INTEREST FROM 2/1/15 TO 228/15 - ""' -- IN"( ERE51 EARNED UNU S TREA.SURTNI U./50% 2Y28118%1PV UN .03/022015 912828UR9 5020000.0000 SHARES DUE 2282015 30,030,963.56 (4,972 787 50) 4,972,787 50 (22,607.73) - (4,978,109.77) 4,978.109.77 (12,543.92) (2,494.433.59) 2,494,433.59 (932.32) (2467,653.13) 2,487,653.13 (7123.43) (4,974,114.) 4.974,114.06 (18,720.99) - " (18,825.00) 18.825.00 9.91 - 18,825.00 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF APPLE INC 0.450 % 5/03/16 /CREDIT 03/032015 02262015 03/032015 037833AH3 SUISSE SECURITIES (USA)/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.043 % 500,000.0000 1.000430 ........_._ ___..... .... _ . ..-PAIDACCRUEU IN I ERES7"UN PURCHASE'UH APPLE INC ..._.0.450% _ ....... ......._...-. .031032015 03/032015 037833AH3 5/03/16 - - PURCHASEU PAR VALUE OF cHEVRUN CORP - 1.385/ -3702/18' 03/032015 02/262015 03/032015 166764AV2 BNY/MIZUHO SECURITIES USA INC./500,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.994 % 500,000.0000 0.999940_ - - PURCHAJto-PAR VALUE' OFDDR'E'ENEROYISNUTA4-0:55i97% )771716 03/032015 02262016 03/032015 263901A_EO /GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO./500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.131 % 500,000.0000 1.001310 - - ' PAID ACCRUED IN I EHESI ON PURCHASE OF DUKE ENERGY INDIAN (500,215.00) 500,215.00 (750.00) - (499,970.00) 499,970.00 (500,655.00) 500.655.00 - + `03/032015 03/032015 263901AE0 0.59197% 7/11/16 - - (426.49) - 03/03/2015 03/032015 03/032015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOUT OBLIG FUND CL Y (4,693,603.0200) 1.000000 - - - - 4,693,603.02 (4,693 603.02) PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF GEN ELEC CAP CRP MTN 5.409% 2/15/17 .03/03/2015 02262015 03/032015 36962G2G8 M.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC/XNYS 104,000 PAR VALUE AT 108.51 % 104,000.0000 1.085100 - (112,850.40) 112 850.40 PAIL) ACCKUEtTIN"fERES l ZiF1PURCHASE Y7H'GEIVECEC CAP CRP._`.-" .03/032015 03/032015 36962G2G8 MTN 5.400% 2/15/17 - - -, ...._.__.. __..._ ._ ..........._. ..PURCHASED PAR VALUE.OF..GENELEC CAP URP1VITN-5:615%d"9715/17 03/032015 02262015 03/032015 36962G3H5 /PERSHING LLC/XNYS 500,000 PAR VALUE AT 110.918 % 500,000.0000 1.109180 - PAN AC.C.KUEU IN I tkES) ON' PURCHASE OF't+E"N ELEC. C.AP CRP... _.. _. .._..._._. 031032015 03/03/2015 36962G3H5 MTN 5.625% 9/15/17 .. _ PURCHASED PAR VALUE Of- I).5921%'5/18/18/UBE 03/032015 0226/2015 03/032015 58933YAH8 SECURITIES LLC/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.32 % ....... - " _. - PAIL) ACCRUED IN IEKES I UN PURCHA:SE"OF MERCK CU INC 03/032015 03/03/2015 58933YAH8 0.5921% 5/18/18 - - _... ._........_.__ _. .-.--...... PURCHASED PAR VALUE UF PFICEK INC........ TI.90L.No 1)ib/117/JH _....... _ ... .... '. ...... ."" ... 03/032015 02262015 03/032015 717081 DD2 MORGAN CHASE BANKMSBCSI/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.29 % 500,000.0000 1.002900 - - D __... ......._ _..... _.- ......... PAID ACCRUE -IN IEREBT ONTPURCHASE OF-PHZER-iNC. ......"'11:91HT�__.,.....-_... .. ..... __..._. 03/032015 03/032015 717081DD2 1/15/17 - - - v PURCHASEU PAR VALUE OF -DANK t7AM 1-1 3-595: 5/18/18--- ----�� 500.000.0000 1.003200 03/032015 02262015 03/032015 90331 HMQ3 /WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.198 % 500,000.0000 1.001980 ..- "..__-_..... _ _..... PAIL) ACCRUEYSIN'IERESIUN"PURCHASE OE L)S BANK NA M IN "........-` .-'.- '.03/032015 03/032015 90331HM03 1.350°% 126/18 - _ PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF WELLS FARGO M I N 0.8506 % 423/18 03/032015 02/26/Z015 03/032015 94974BFK1 /GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO./500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.574 % 500,000.0000 _ 1.005740 PAIU AC:C.KUtU IN I EKES) UN PURUHASt OF WELLS I-ARUU M I N 103/032015 03/03/2015 949746FK1 0.8606% 4/23/18 - (480.51) - ' HURUHAJtU HAK VALUE Oh WELLS-ARu'U-UUTAHANY"1.'1SiH. (280.80) _ (554 590.00) 554.590.00 (13,125.00) - - (501,600.00) 501,600.00 (111,26) (501,450.00) 501450.00 - (600.00) - - (500,990.00) 500,990.00 (675D➢)_-- (502,870.00) 502.870.00 - 6/02/17 /STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO.,INC./500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.104 03/03/2015 02262015 03/03/2015 94974BFW5 % 500,0000000 1001040 (500,520.00) 500520.00 - -PAID-ACCRUED IN ERESTOMPURCHASEOh WELLS "FARGU - -- 03/032015 03/032015 949748FW5 COMPANY 1.150% 6/02/17 - - (145347) - _03/052015 �.03/052015 03/05/2015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (818,534.4000) 1.000090 _ _ _ _ 818,534.40 (818,536.40) - - -" '--'--' -- PURCHASED PAR VALUE Uh IBM CORP 1.12S% 2/013/161KiTC- 03/052015 03/022015 03/052015 459200HZ7 CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.54 % 500,000 0000. _0.995400 _ - (497.709.00) 818,534.40 - .�.__ "....... ,.�_. __._ ....... ...._PAID ACCRCJEL/IN I EKES I" ON PURCHASE OF"(BM'CORP-"9-:125% '".._..". - 103/05/2015 03/052015 459200HZ7 2/06/18 - (453.13) PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF WAL MART STORES INC 0.600% 4/11/16 03/052015 03/022015 03/052015 931t42DE0 NJELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC/319.000 PAR VALUE AT 100.123 % 319,000.0000 75 1.001930 - (319,615.67) 319 615.87 Page 20 of 23 ATTACHMENT 13 MON Riverside County Transportation Commimiort Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2015 Account Number: 001050990415 Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Short Term Long Term Transaction Settlement Miscellaneous Federal Tax Cost Gain/Loss Gain/Loss Date Trade Date Date CUSIP Description Units Price Commissions SEC Fees Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Amount Amount 03/052015 433/062015 03/03/2015 [03/062015 03/062015 .03/092015 03/092015 03/052015 931142DE0 1 ENE SI r l n 'v1 HIS! N 0.600% 4/11/16 PURCHASEDPARVALUEUEEXXUNNOBIL 1:30S.V....3)Ub1187J:P.:... .. ...............-. 03/062015 30231GAL6 MORGAN SECURITIES LLC/460,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 % 03/062015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y 03/092015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT °BUG FUND CL Y PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF PASADENA CA UNIF SCH 0.541 % 11/01/15 -03/092015 03/042015 03/092015 702282NA8 NVELLS FARGO BANK, N.A./SIG/425,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.103 % 425,000.0000 1.001030 ....._ ........... ...... _ _.. _. PAYD ACCRUEu iN I I:. EKES .ON"FUHCHASE UP PASAUENA CA UNIT•.... ..._... ' 03/092015 03/092015 702282NA8 SCH 0.541 % 11/01/15 - 03/112015 03/112015 03/112015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (489,968.4400) 1.000000 PORCIH7{S" - PAFtVtiLY:1EUT- 'j"t7HN'UttF(EOUVNtH..._.7i .8/U'ib 'I S/1 - /CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC./490.000 PAR VALUE AT 03/112015 03/032015 03/112015 47787UAB9 99.99355918 % 490,000.0000 0.999936_ PURCHA:SE() PAR 'VALUE ' OF ei II BANK CRELX i CARD 1:699%'2/2019 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN/700,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.78906286 03/16/2015 03/112015 03/162015 17305EFN0 % 700,000.0000 0.997891 - (698,523.44) .__.PAID ACCRUEUIN I ERESTONPURCHAS'E OPe TIBANK CR6Ul'I CA'RU. .............. ._........ ,.... 03/162015 03/162015 17305EFN0 1.020% 222/19 - - _ _ - - _ _ (476.00) 460,000.0000 1.000000 (460.000 0000) 1.000000 (426,255.2600) 1.000000 (765.60) T. (460,000.00) 460,000.00 460 000.00 _ (460,000.00) 426,255.26 (426,255.26) (425,437.75) 425,437.75 (817.51) 489,968.44 (489,968.44) (489,968.44) 03/162015 03/162015 03/162015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (1,569,890 7700) 1.000000 - 1,569,890.77 _....._.. _ __... ....... .......... - ...............- INf ERES I EARNED ON GEN tLEC CAP CRP M i N 5.625%-ii715/1 "61.PV .__..... _....... _..... - - _....._.._.. 03/162015 36962G3H5 ON 500000 0000 SHARES DUE 3/152015 - - 14,062.50 ..... -..... .,. ........ ........_ ....PURCHASED PARVALUE OF IUYUTA Au i 0 RtC ..'_0:890 71'7717...... ............... ._. 03/162015 03/112015 03/162015 89236VAC4 /GOLDMAN, SACHS 8 CO./709,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.125 % 709,000.0000 1.001250 (709,886.25) .._-_ ..... _..,....._.--...-...,. -. ,_._..PAIGACCRUEU..I� NItFtESI'ON "PURCH"A-bt(5"1=iOY0�l'A71U10"Rti: ...,._ ......,_ ...._._..._....._.,.......,.__._.�....._._.._.._ 03/162015 03/16/2015 89236VAC4 0.890% 7/17/17 _ _ (17.53) :._....._.. .._.. - ..._.__..__ ._. - INERES I EARNED ON U S- I NEAsuR'PFI("-' 17000%97Y5/17-$1 PV-ON -- -- -�.-- 03/162015 912828098 4960000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/152015 24,800.00 489,968.44 698,523.44 (1,569,890.77) 709,886.25 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF VOLKSWAGEN AUTO 0.870% 620/17 03/162015 03/112015 03/1615 92867VAB6 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN200,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.89844 % 200,000.0000 0.998984 - (199,796.88) 199,796.88 ......._ ._............... _ __.. 20.._.._ __._._.._....__._...P741 ACCHUEUIN IERtS I' ON PUtFC:HASEOFVOLRSWTAGENAUU ............,.. .. __._._ 03/162015 03/162015 92867VAB6 0.870% 620/17 (53.17) - 03/172015 03/172015 03/172015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y _ (799,804 7800) 1.000000 - _ _ 799,804.78 _ (799 804.78) - - _.... _...... _ __._ ...... ...... .__._.__._ ...._......_ _ .-..-PURCHASED RATTVALUE-O JORKFUEERE`LVUNER-B112U%.-4Tilin 5""... /NOMURA SECURITIES/FIX INCOME/750,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.972656 03/172015 03/122015 03/172015 47787VAC5 % 750,000.0000 0.999727 - (749,794.92) 749,794.92 ......_.__.- .............._...__._._.._...""PAATACCRUEL11NTERESTON'PUNCHASE'OHJOHN-DEEREOWNER _............ ...__.. ... .___.. 103/172015 03/172015 47787VAC5 0.920% 4/16/18 - - - - - (38.33) •PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF VOLKSWAGEN AUTO 0.870% 620/17 03/172015 03/122015 03/172015 92867VAB6 /JP MORGAN CHASE BANK/HSBCSI/50,000 PAR VALUE AT 99 91406 % 50,000 0000 0.999141 . _ T (49 957.03) 49,957.03 - - PAIUACCRUELMN ERES) ONPURCHD.�SE"OF-CIF ..." .....__. ..._._.._....._......._...._._. - - ... .... !03/172015 03/172015 92867VAB6 0.870% 620/17 - - - (14.50) - PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 1.550 % 2/09/18 03/182015 03/132015 03/182015 084670BH0 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.866 % 500,000.0000 1.008660 (504,330.00) 504,330.00 .._._.'-RAID ACCRUED(NTETter�ortPOR HAS"E"OF"IE"RASHIRE"FfAT O WAY - - ._..�__......�.. ._...- 03/182015 03/182015 084670BH0 1.550% 2/09/18 - - - (839.58) .... ..._.._ __. _.. ...--....--..... ..........PURCHASED PAR -VALUE- OFCOLGAI�EYALM I N...._2,625% 5/U171/._ _._. ............_ .. .. .. 03/162615 03/132015 03/1e2015 19416ODU1 /MITSUBISHI UFJ SECURITIES USA/505,000 PAR VALUE AT 103.589 % 505,000.0000 t.035890 (523,124.45) 523,124.45 RAU ACLRUEOIN I EREs f UN PURCHASE Or LOLGAI E P'ACM"MI N 03/182015 - 03/182015 19416610W 2.625% 5/01/17 - - (5,044:/ ) _ _ .. _._,_ _�.._. ... - - - - 03/182015 03/18/2015 03/18/2015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOUT OBLIG FUND CL Y (1 033,338 77001 - 1 000000 _ - - 1,033,338.77 ,(1,033 338 77).. 03202015 0320/2015 03/202015 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y 90.6300 1.000000 (90.63) 90.63 - - IN I tKtJ I tAKNCU UN VULKSVVHL,N HUI,/ U.6/0713 13/20/1/SI YV ON 90.6330 SHARES DUE 3/20/2015 50.00036/PV ON 250 000.00 PV -03202015 92867VAB6 DUE 3/20/15 - - 90.63 _- 03252015 03252915 03252015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (500,000 0000) 1.000000 _ - - 500.000.09 (500.000.00) YUKUh'HSLU YAK VALUt OF UNIV CHLIFURNIH CA 1.4167o 5/15/1 b 03252015 03/132015 0325/2_015 91412GWU5 /BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN/250000 PAR VALUE AT 100 % 250,000.0000 1.000000 - - (250,000 ) 250,000.00 -- ---- _ PURCHASED PAH VALUE OF UNIV OF -SA 2.60.s% 5/1 S7T9 .03252015 03/13/2015 03252615 91412GWV3 !BARCLAYS CAPITAL iNC. FIXED IN250.000 PAR VALUE AT 100 % 250,000.0000 1.000000 - - (250,000.00) 250,000.00 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 0.496 % 2/1820 03/262015 03232015 03262015 161571 GS7 2.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC/750,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.0625 % 750,000.0000 1.000625 - (750,468.75) 750,468.75 • NAI�AZ:CRUEDINVERESVONPURCHASE OF`CHASE1SSUANCt .__..._ .-. 03262015 n2621)15 161571GS7 TRUST 0.496% 2/1820 - - - (134.33) " _ - `--"----------'-PURL:HASEU'PA1<VALUEUF'1;111BANK-NH-NE -0:25449%" 4/119/1 /CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC./500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.004472 103262015 0325/2015 0326/2015 17304UO3i % 504000.0000 1.000045 - (500,022.36) 500,022.36 - ,_- PAIDU'D 1AOCHEIN)EHEsi U ON"PRCHASt OF"CI716-ANKNXNEL1-' _...._ - , 032633615 03/262015 17304UD31 0.25449% 4/09/15 _ (60.211 - - 10326/2015 03/262015 03/26/2015 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT °BUG FUND CL Y 4,000205-1500 1 000000 (4000,205.15) 4.000,205.15 �83ke2015 63/26/2015 03/26/2015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (15,512789 8100) 1.000000 15 512 789.61 05,512,789.61) - --. HUKi:HAb LU HAN VALUt Ur Eat UtALt1{}YYOORPIALP0-8193"!e �....... .... 1020/19 U.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC/750,000 PAR VALUE AT 03/26/2015 03/232015 0326/2015 36159LCN4 100.07812533 % 750,000.0000 1.000781 - - (750,585.94) 750,585.94 - - PAID'ACCRUEti IN ERESi iNPURCFCASE'UF'GE'DEACER'R'.UORPOK'-"' _.._._..._._..7 _.._.. _ CP4.28i2.015 03 262C/15 36159LCN4 0.58193% 10/20/19 - - (78.25) - .. _ _... - ........_Page 2i-of 23 C: Riverside county Transportation commission Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31 2015 Account Number: 001050990415 Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Transaction Settlement Date Trade Date Date CUSIP Description Hulot ,K - Y li , UI' , . °w Yhlr N To 6/,51/10 /NOMURA SECURITIES/FIX INCOME/5,000,000 PAR VALUE AT 03262015 03/252015 03262015 912828D64 100.0976562% PAIL) ACCRUED INI EKESI ON PCiRCF(A5B2.11- U S IR"EASURYNT- _03262015 012e/2015 012826E184 0.500% 8/31/16 PURCHASED ?AN VALUE Oh U S'TREASURY N I 0.3/6701 0/31/16 U rats Short Term long Term Miscellaneous Federal Tax Cost Gain/loss Gain/loss Price Commissions SEC Fees Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Amount Amount 5,000,000.0000 1.000977 (5,004,882.81) (1,766.30) 5,004.882.81 - /CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC./5,000,000 PAR VALUE AT 9326/2015 0325/2015 03262015 912828F88 99.828125% 5,000,000.0000 0.998281 - PAID ACCRUED IN 1 tKES I UN PURCHASE Oh U S I KEASURYN I 03262015 03262015 912828F88 0.375 % 10/31/16 ...... ........ ..... _. _.,.._...._ �..._.. ..,......_,.-.....-_. SOLD PAR'VA:LDE OF 0 S'`REAJURY N I...... U:875% 11/15/1/iRA---'- ' 0326/2015 03252015 03262015 912828G20 SECURITIES INC.2,000,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.136719 % (2,000,000.0000) 1.001367 - ' RECEIVEU'AOCRUEU iN 1 EKESTUN SACEWU 5 TREASURY NI 03262015 03262015 912828G20 0.875%11/15/17 YUKUHAJtU YAK VALUt Ur U J I KtHJUKY N I U.3.715 'I/31/1 / /DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES, INC.2,500,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.9375 03262015 tW15+26s5 03262015 912828H78 % 2,500,009.0000 0.999375 - _._................. .. ... ........ ..... NAIL) ACCRUED IN IEREBI ON PURCHASE Oh S l KEHSUHY N I. 03262015 03262015 912828H78 0.500% 1/31/17 - - - SOW PAR VALUE Ur U S IKEASURY NI U./09,4r4o/1a /CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC./XOTC 2,000,000 PAR VALUE AT ;03/262015 =5)2MS 03262015 912828UR9 99.503906 % (2,000,000.0000) 0.995039 Eii - ..... .............__. __._......_........-RECVEU'ACCRUEU-IN ERESI ON SALE Or US TREASURY.NL........ ....._... _ 03262015 03262015 912828UR9 0.750% 228/18 _ ...._....... .... ... ._........._ _..... ............ ... .. ACCREDIEUUISODUN I'ON U J I REASURY N I U./SU°A 2/26/16 . '03/26/2015 _ _ 9128280R9 MARKET DISCOUNT `PURCHASED) -PAR VALUE Ur U S fREASURY N I 7773/5% //15/ I / (4.091,406.25) 4,991406.25 (7,562.15) - 2,002,734.38 (1,995,234.38) 6.332.87 (2.498,437.50) 2,498,437.50 (1,864.64) 7,500.00 1,990,078.12 (1,982,168.70) 7,909.42 1,059.78 /JPMORGAN CHASE BANK/RBS SEC0RI/1,000,000 PAR VALUE AT _0326201_5 4.325Qp01E 03262015 912828VVT3 100.382813 % 1,000,000.0000 1.003828 - (1,003,828.13) TPAIU ACCRUED IN I EKES I ON PURCHASE OF U S I KEASUKY N I.. _... '03/262015 03262015 912828WT3 0.875% 7/15/17 (1,691.99) PURCHASEU FAIT VALUE Oh APPLE INC. (7.41:054a 5103/18 03272015 41 4.2015 03272015 037833AG5 /MORGAN STANLEY 8 CO. LLC250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.288 % 250,000.0000 1.002880 (25fl 720.00) ........__._ PAIL) ACCRUED IN i EKES I ON PURCRASE"OF APPLE INC'_ _. 0327/2015 03272015 037833AG5 0.48235% 5/03/18 (181.68) Of- Til'M .............. ..__-_-..... ........ .PURCHASED PARVALUE..DEBANK Of- 0:7036%. 3/06/Tb_..... .............._. .................. .................-_- _ -- _ _.... 03272015 03242015 0327201.5 06406HCK3 /WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC/750,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.182 % 750,000.0000 1.001820 (751 �6$.00) ,._,_.._-.. ___... ....... ........... PAID ACCRUED IN I EKES I UN E PURCHASUh SANKCA-NY M I N __. ........... ... 03272015 0327/2015 06406HCK3 0.7036% 3/06/18 - (307.83) 449.95 1,003,828.13 250,720.00 751 365.00 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 0.5533% 1/12/18 03272015 03242015 03272015 _ 084664CD1 /RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.258 % 250,000.0000 1.002580 (250,645.00) 250,645.00 PAID ACCRUED IN I EKES I UN PURCHASE Oh BERKSHIRE HA HAWAY 03272015 0327/2015 084664CD1 0.5533% 1/12/18 - (272.81) - PURCHASEU PAK VALUE UFCALITORNIA"STV"AR`-"1:050%-2/01716"��` - - - CJI£J12915 03242015 03272015 130638N73 NJELLS FARGO BANK, N.A:SIG/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.572 % 500,000.0000 1.005720 - (502,860.00) 502,860.00 --......._. --...... - .PAIL/ ACCRUED IN IEKES I' UN PUKCHAS OF"CALIFORNIA S I VAR .0327/2015 03272015 13063BN73 1.050% 2/01/16 (816.67) PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF CHEVRON CORP 0.90001 % 11/10/1 /.......................- 032720/5 03242015 03272015 166764AK6 /GOLDMAN. SACHS 8 CO 250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.06 % 250,000 0000 1.000600 (250,150.00� 250,150.00 P{11U ACCRUED INTEREST UN PURCHASE CHEVRONCUKP��� ���������������� ������� 03272015 03272015 166764AK6 0.00001 % 11/15/17 - (11271) - . PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF C(SCO SYSTEMS INC 0.5146% 3/03/1 / 03/2720}5 03242015 03272015 17275RAS1 /PERSHING LLC/750,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.3183 % 750,000.0000 1.003183 - (752,387.25) 752,387.25 I .... _. - ..PAW ACCRUED IN EKES I UN'PURCHASEOF CISCO SYS I Ems' NZ; IN.-- _.. ....... _ .03/27/1015 03272015 17275RAS1 0.5146% 3/03/17 (270.93) 03272015 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF DUKE ENERGY INDIAN 0.59197% 7/11/16 0324/2015 03272015 263901AE0 /CANTOR FITZGERALD 8 CO.250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.147 % PAID ACCRUED IN I EKES I ON PURCHASE UITTURE ENERGY INDIAN 03/272015 03272015 263901AE0 0.59197% 7/11/16 :03272015 03272015 03272015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (3,512,510.2600) 1.000000 ..._......... .... ......... ......... ......... .....PURCHASED PAR VALUE UFMERCK CUING 15921% 5718/1671JB5 .. ........... .............. ............... 03272015 03242015 0327/2015 58933YAH8 SECURITIES LLC250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.48 % . ........ PA'IU ACCRUE) IN I EKES I UN PURTRASETOh MERCR"COIN(.: 93272015 03272015 58933YAH8 0.5921% 5/18/18 250,000.0000 1,001470 PURCHASED PAR-VALUFOFUS BANK NA.M I N 0.466% 1/30/1 / /US !03272015 03242015 03272015 90331 HMD2 BANCORP INVESTMENTS INC.250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.077 % 250,000.0000 1.000770 (250,192.50) 250,192.50 PAID ACCKUEU IN I tHES I UN PURCHASE OF US BANK NA M I N 103272015 03272015 90331HMD2 0.485% 1/30/17 - - (18846) - 250,000.0000 1.004800 (250,367.50) 250,367.50 (313.59) 3,512,510.26 _ (3.512.510.26) (251,200.00) 251,200.00 - (158.33) 03/30/2015 03/30/2015 03/302015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (250,133.4100) 1.000000 250,133.41 (250,133.41) PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF PFILEK INC-'" 9.361150 5/15/1 / - -R W3012015 0325/2015 03/302015 717081DP5 /GOLDMAN, SACHS 8 CO.250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.007 % 250 000.0000 1.000070 (250,017.50) 250,017.50 - - ____ _. _ _........... .......PAID-ACCRUEDIN I EKES I ON PURCHASE Oh Ph11EK INC ........ .....-_.. ..._....... 03/302015 03/302015 717081DP5 0.3821 % 5/15/17 - - (115.01) 'PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF h N M A G I 0 REMIC 9.3845% y710/10 ;03/312015 03/122015 03/312015 3136AMTM1 /MORGAN STANLEY 8 CO. LLC/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.97437 % 500,000.0000 0.999744 (499,871.85) 499,871.85 _ __ :..-._ ... ..._. -...._.. - PAIU ACCRUED IN f ERE5I ON PLIRCHAS`E OP F WESv 7G I LT YEMIC .03/312015 03/312015 3136AMTM1 0.3845% 925/18 (160.21) - - 03/312015 03/312015 03/312015 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AMER GOVT OBLIG FUND CL Y (3,006,850.7300) 1.000000 - - �. 3,006,850.73 (3.006.850.73) - ....... .._......_.._. ................._ ............ - PURCHASEU PAH VALUt U1-US TREASURY NT 0.501r16-o/30/1'6"' .... .... .. ........... /CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.2,500,000 PAR VALUE AT 77 03/312015 03/302015 03/312015 912828WQ9 100.1484376 % 2.500,000.0000 1.001484 - - (2,503,710.94) 2,503,710.94 Page 22 6 23 Min 911111mo Riverside County Transportation Camm+ion Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2015 Account Number: 001050990415 Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Short Term tong Term Transaction Settlement Miscellaneous Federal Tax Cost GainlLoss GainlLoss Date Trade Date Date CUSIP Description Units Priro Gom lcrarts 5tC Fein 1=a4s ri9t Ca1vh Amount Ar. tuo0t Amount Amount 03012015 03/312015 912828W09. 0.500% a 30/18. Total (3,10773) 0.00 49,973,514.32 15,409.42 70 Page 23 of 23 ATTACHMENT 13 LOGAN CIRCLE P A R TNER S Riverside County Transportation Commission SHORT DURATION FIXED INCOME First Quarter 2015 Review Logan Circle Partners, L.P. ■ 25 Deforest Avenue Summit, NJ 0790719 ■ 908-376-0550 MARKET REVIEW Outlook and Current Themes ➢ GDP — Stagnant household incomes and a jobs market where labor force participation rate remains at multi - decade lows will continue to temper economic activity. Sustained dollar strength dampens exports while higher spending on healthcare drives services consumption. Expected weakness in first quarter GDP to be driven by a downshift in retail sales and non-residential fixed investment, pointing to another year of 2% to 2.5% growth. ➢ Consumer — Gap in median vs. mean household income data highlights income inequality and constraints on discretionary spending for all but the top strata. Drop in gas prices increases disposable personal income but has not translated into a pickup in consumer spending. Continued student and auto loan debt growth bodes ill for future household formation, spending and savings. • Business — Stronger U.S. dollar and weaker international growth will pressure revenues and earnings of select industrial sub -sectors (technology, consumer non-cyclicals, capital goods manufacturers). Impact of a sustained drop in energy prices creates winners (airlines, trucking, retailers, paper companies) and losers (oil and gas producers, oil field service, offshore drillers, energy -dependent regional economies). Financials continue to build capital, maintain substantial liquidity, improve balance sheets due to regulatory pressure and restrictions. ➢ Employment — Difference between U-6 (highlighting the underemployed) and the headline unemployment rate underscores continued slack in labor market. Trend towards increasing hourly wages will not impact overall income growth. Employment gains continue to be supported by part-time and lower -paying positions. Certain service sectors (leisure, info, business) average hourly earnings outpace goods and government year over year changes. ➢ Housing — Annual home price appreciation will remain in the 3-5% range but may move higher in the short run due to the supply limitations in certain markets. Seasonal factors and FHA's mortgage insurance premium reduction may temporarily accelerate existing home sales. First-time homebuyer demand remains weak and recently launched affordability loan programs to benefit a limited number of new buyers. New construction is gaining momentum, however new home sales as a proportion of total home sales remains below historical norms. The risk of regulatory -induced volatility in the RMBS market will continue as lawmakers push for increased access to mortgage credit. ➢ Inflation — Core PCE continues to run below Fed's long-term 2% target. Sustained dollar strength has disinflationary implications. Consistent with trends in other developed economies, decline in commodity and energy prices as well as limited wage growth keeps inflation in check. ➢ International — Interest rates in many developed markets will remain low given central bank stimulus measures. Monthly purchase targets in ECB QE program may be difficult to achieve under current parameters. Desired impact of competitive devaluation policies unlikely to be realized as global growth remains anemic. China's slowing economic growth continues to be a headwind for other emerging and commodity -based economies. ➢ Monetary and Fiscal Policy — Global monetary conditions will remain loose. Monetary stimulus requires accompanying fiscal measures to engineer sustainable recoveries. New U.S. congressional construct shapes the fiscal policy agenda for the next few years including corporate tax and regulatory reform. Federal Reserve's efforts to achieve policy normalization delayed due to current economic slowdown and low inflation. Fed's forecast for growth, inflation and funds rate moves closer to market expectations. The views pre,%nted above are Logan Qrde's and are subject to change over time. There can be no assurance that the views expressed above will prove accurate and should not be relied upon as a reliable indicator of future events 80 1 LOGANCIRCLE I' AR TN ER 5 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — Construction Fund Portfolio Characteristics As of July 11, 2013 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 0.67% Duration 1.48 Years Average Quality (Maodys) Al As of March 31, 2015 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 0.45% Duration 0.08 Years Average Quality (IV odys) Aa2 Asset Allocation Municipal 4% ABS 1A‘i/ Corporate 53% ABS 2% CP 86% Municipal 12% CP 30% Portfolio Perfommancel 1 Q 2015 2014 Since Inception (Annualized) Since Inception (Cumulative) Total Construction Fund (Gross of Fees) 0.11% 0.39% 0.43% 0.76% Total Construction Fund (Net of Fees) 0.09% 0.30% 0.35% 0.61 % Qtigroup 3-Month Treasury Bill 0.01 % 0.03% 0.03% 0.06% Past Perfonmance is not inchoative of future results. Performance returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. The performance benchmark shown for the Fdverside County Construction Find is the atigroup 3-IVbnth Treasury Bill, which tracks the retum of one three-month Treasury bill until maturity 81 LOGANCIRCLE 2 AR TN ER 5 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — Capitalized Interest Fund Portfolio Characteristics As of July 11, 2013 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.00% Duration 2.39 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aa1 As of March 31, 2015 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 0.60% Duration 1.01 Years Average Quality (IV odys) Aa1 Municipal 3% RMBS 7% Municipal 8% Asset Allocation ABS 2% CMBS 12% ABS 1% Money Markets 12% Money Markets 10% Portfolio Performance' 1Q2015 2014 Since Inception (Annualized) Since Inception (Cumulative) Total Capitalized Interest Fund (Gross of Fees) 0.38% 1.06% 1.31% 2.31 % Total Capitalized Interest Fund (Net of Fees) 0.36% 0.96% 1.21 2.13% B of A ML U.S. Treasury Index 0-2 Year 0.19% 0.25% 0.35% 0.61% Fast Performance is not indicative of future results Performance returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. The performance benchmark shown for the Faverside County Capitalized Interest Fund is the Bank ofArrierica IVbrrill Lyres US 0-2 Year Treasury Index, which is a broad bawd index that measures short-term Treasury !Votes and Bonds with a maturity range between zero and two years, and is presented for discussion purposes only. 82 3 LOGANCIRCLE I' AR TN ER 5 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — Debt Reserve Fund Portfolio Characteristics As of July 11, 2013 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.98% Duration 5.04 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa As of March 31, 2015 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.38% Duration 3.93 Years Average Quality (IV odys) Aaa Asset Allocation CMBS Portfolio Performance' 1 Q 2015 2014 Since Inception (Annualized) Since Inception (Cumulative) Total Debt Service Fund (Gross of Fees) 1.57% 4.31 3.45% 6.12% Total Debt Service Fund (Net of Fco;) 1.55% 4.21 3.35% 5.94% B of A ML U.S. Treasury Index 3-7 Year 1.73% 3.13% 2.75% 4.86% Past Performance is not indicative of future results. Performance retums for periods greater than one year are annualized. The performance benchmark shown for the fd verside County Capitalized Interest Fund is the Bank of America Until Lynch US Treasury 3-7 Year, which is a broad -based index consisting of U.S Treasury securities with an outstanding par greater or equal to $25 million and a maturity range from three to seven year indusive, reflecting total retum. 83 LOGANCIRCLE AR TN ER 5 PORTFOLIO REVIEW Portfolio Market Value Portfolio Market Value (7/3/2013) Net Outflows Market Value Change in (3/31/2015) Market Value Construction (Sales Tax) $332,687,595 ($262,526,048) $72,133,339 +$1,971,792 Construction (Toll Revenue) $122,120,571 ( ,273,578) S42,278,019 +$431,026 Total Construction Funds $454,808,167 ($342,799,626) $114,411,359 +$2,402,818 Portfolio Market Value (7/3/2013) Net Outflows Market Value Change in (3/31/2015) Market Value Capitalized Interest (Sales Tax) $103,683,353 ($33,924,681) $71,893,074 +$2,134,402 Capitalized Interest (Toll Revenue) S31,416,498 ($10,047,023) $22,072,047 +$702,572 Total Capitalized Interest Funds $135,099,851 ($43,971,704) $93,965,121 +$2,836,974 Portfolio Market Value (7/3/2013) Net Outflows Market Value Change in (3/31/2015) Market Value Debt Service Deserve Fund $17,667,869 $0 $18,746,769 +$1,078,900 84 LOGANCIRCLE I' AR TN ER 5 DISCLAIMERS In general. This disclaimer applies to this document and the verbal or written comments of any person presenting it. This document, taken together with any such verbal or written comments, is referred to herein as the "Presentation." Logan Circle Partners, L.P., a Fortress Investment Group LLC company, is referred to herein as "Logan Circle". No offer to purchase or sell securities. This Presentation is being provided to you at your specific request. This Presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security and may not be relied upon in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. Projections. Projections contained in this Presentation are based on a variety of estimates and assumptions by Logan Circle, including, among others, estimates of future operating results, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, and the timing and manner of disposition or other realization events. These estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and are subject to numerous business, industry, market, regulatory, competitive and financial risks that are outside of Logan Circle's control. There can be no assurance that the assumptions made in connection with the projections will prove accurate, and actual results may differ materially, including the possibility that an investor may lose some or all of its invested capital. The inclusion of the projections herein should not be regarded as an indication that Logan Circle or any of its affiliates considers the projections to be a reliable prediction of future events and the projections should not be relied upon as such. Neither Logan Circle nor any of its affiliates or representatives has made or makes any representation to any person regarding the projections and none of them intends to update or otherwise revise the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date when made or to reflect the occurrence of future events, if any or all of the assumptions underlying the projections are later shown to be in error. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "projections" includes "targeted returns". Past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results and should not be relied upon as the basis for making an investment decision. The information presented is only available for institutional client use and is presented for use only as a one-on-one presentation. No reliance, no update and use of information. You may not rely on this Presentation as the basis upon which to make an investment decision. To the extent that you rely on this Presentation in connection with any investment decision, you do so at your own risk. This Presentation is being provided in summary fashion and does not purport to be complete. The information in the Presentation is provided to you as of the dates indicated and Logan Circle does not intend to update the information after its distribution, even in the event that the information becomes materially inaccurate. Certain information contained in this Presentation, includes performance and characteristics of Logan Circle's strategies and any represented benchmarks, which may derive from calculations or figures that have been provided by independent third parties, or have been prepared internally and have not been audited or verified. Use of different methods for preparing, calculating or presenting information may lead to different results for the information presented, compared to publicly quoted information, and such differences may be material. Knowledge and experience. You acknowledge that you are knowledgeable and experienced with respect to the financial, tax and business aspects of this Presentation and that you will conduct your own independent financial, business, regulatory, accounting, legal and tax investigations with respect to the accuracy, completeness and suitability of this Presentation should you choose to use or rely on this Presentation, at your own risk, for any purpose. Risk of loss. An investment in the strategy will be highly speculative and there can be no assurance that the strategy's investment objectives will be achieved. Investors must be prepared to bear the risk of a total loss of their investment. Distribution of this Presentation. Logan Circle expressly prohibits any reproduction, in hard -copy, electronic or any other form, or any redistribution to any third party of this Presentation without the prior written consent of Logan Circle. This Presentation is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use is contrary to local law or regulation. No tax, legal or accounting advice. This Presentation is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for (and you shall not construe it as) accounting, legal, regulatory, financial or tax advice or investment recommendations. Any statements of U.S. federal tax consequences contained in this Presentation were not intended to be used and cannot be used to avoid penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or to promote, market or recommend to another party any tax -related matters addressed herein. Confidentiality. By accepting receipt or reading any portion of this Presentation, you agree that you will treat the Presentation confidentially. This reminder should not be read to limit, in any way, the terms of any confidentiality agreement you or your organization may have in place with Logan Circle. 85 LOGANCIRCLE I' AR TN ER 5 ATTACHMENT 14 Payden&Rygel Quarterly Portfolio Review Riverside County Transportation Commission 1st Quarter 2015 Ili PAYDEN.COM LOS ANGELES I BOSTON I LONDON I PARIS 86 I Payden & Rygel April 2015 As the first quarter of 2015 ends, much uncertainty surrounds the global economic data. We believe that in the US, the recovery is going to last. Even if consumer spending was lower during the first quarter, we expect it to pick up. In Europe, some point to low inflation as a cause for concern. It is important to note, though, that leading indicators suggest the worst in Europe may be in the past. There's also uncertainty about the path of central bank policy. Fifteen of the 17 members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) indicate that an interest rate hike will likely occur in 2015. It doesn't make sense for the key US overnight interest rate to be near zero much longer. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank (ECB) commenced a new asset purchase program during the quarter and negative interest rates pervade much of the European bond market. The Fed is tightening, while the ECB is easing. For investors, this has meant a stronger US dollar, in fact, the last three quarters have seen the strongest appreciation of the dollar in 25 years. In part, this is due to the attractiveness of dollar denominated holdings when Europe is plagued by low and, in some cases, negative bond yields. A stronger dollar also brings weaker commodity prices (e.g., oil). A further contributing factor is somewhat slower growth in the developing world, which is now 50% of GDP. Geopolitical forces will also continue to be in the headlines and commodity prices will be volatile. Our message is to "stay the course." Our portfolios are diversified and as a firm we are in a position to act quickly in the cash market place when dislocations and opportunities occur. We do not feel there is compelling reason to alter overall objectives. Of course we are looking at individual strategies and holdings and making changes where appropriate. We believe over the next year the US equity market will continue to show positive returns, and opportunities will still prevail in the global fixed income area as there will be no significant surprises in inflationary trends. My best wishes for the coming months. Joan A. Payden President & CEO 87 2812 ABJ AOC Riverside County Transportation Commission Portfolio Review -1st Quarter 2015 Portfolio Characteristics (3/31/2015) Portfolio Market Value $50.1 million Weighted Average Credit Quality AA+ Weighted Average Duration 1.7 years Weighted Average Yield to Maturity 0.6°/0 Sector Allocation 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% �t0 ■ a\ �5 a �J•`G\9 �� ��G�e \-V(10 Performance for March was 0.20%. Portfolio quarterly performance to be reported next period. Duration Distribution 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0-1 1 -2 2-3 3+ Years Markets: Economic growth and monetary policy diverged between the US and the rest of the developed world. The US is preparing to tighten monetary policy in the near term, while the European Central Bank began expanding monetary stimulus by buying sovereign bonds. The lack of "safe assets" coupled with unprecedented low yields in Europe and Asia have kept global yields low. However, US Treasury yields and credit spreads traded in wide ranges as investors attempted to analyze the potential outcomes of a federal funds rate hike and improving economic data. The 2-year Treasury yield traded between 0.41 % and 0.73% before ending the quarter at 0.56%. Additionally, the US dollar appreciated against all but one of the G10 currencies and increased to multi -year highs against the Euro. Both investment grade and high yield credit provided strong returns as spreads tightened and commodity prices stabilized. Portfolio Comments: The RCTC account funded in late February. Over the quarter, we gradually structured the portfolio, investing the majority of the assets in US Treasury bonds while establishing allocations to spread sectors (e.g. corporates, asset-backeds, munis and mortgages) for the yield advantage and diversification benefits. pPayden & Rygel • 333 South Grand Avenue • Los AngelMCalifornia goo7i • (213) 625-igoo • www.payden.com THE MAIN STORY Q1 2015 The first quarter can be characterized by two primary themes: central banks and negative yields. As the US continued its trend of global economic outperformance with strong payroll growth; European economic data also showed signs of improvement. Yet, despite stabilizing oil prices, inflation continued to be subdued globally, prompting many central banks to ease policy throughout the quarter. Bucking the trend was the US Federal Reserve, who on balance indicated a more hawkish stance paving the way for interest rate hikes in the second half of 2015. By the end of January, the European Central Bank (ECB) initiated its long awaited asset purchase program "QE" and committed to a $1 trillion bond buying program as an important first step on the way to economic recovery. As the ECB joins the Bank of Japan and the US Federal Reserve in bond buying, central banks will compete with other investors for the limited bonds available. As a result, a global scarcity of bonds has occurred, which resulted in nearly $1.5 trillion worth of sovereign bonds at negative yields in Europe and low interest rates in the UK, US and Japan. Global Central Bank Bond Buying Results in Negative Net Issuance 2,000 1,500 500 0 -500 US, Euro Area, and Japan: Net Annual Bond Issuance Available to the Private Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (Est.) Source: BCA Research Note: Total securities outstanding less central bank purchases and foreign official holdings. 89 THE WORLD'S PULSE THROUGH WEB SEARCH TRENDS Is it possible to peer into the minds of investors and the general public? No, but using "Google Trends" we can take a peek into search trends over the last year. The charts below track search volume based on key search terms. Together and separately they tell a story of market worries over the past quarter. ■ Q1 2015 Search Terms 100 80 60 40 20 Apple Unveils Smartwatch - BBC Crunch time for Apple Watch bulls and beaFT* The Apple Watch Is Time, Saved - Techcrunch 0, Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 100 80 60 40 20 a� 0 The EC Bond QE - The Economist Open-ended European QE set to 'start with a bang' - cNBc ECB Official Details First QE Purchases - WSJ Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. > 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 O i 100 a, 80 s i 60 au 40 Wall Street begins 24/7 Fed 'patient' watch - USA Today "APPLE WATCH" The highly -anticipated gadget debuts at a Silicon Valley press conference and the next phase of "wearable" technology officially begins. "ECB QE" At long last the European Central Bank follows in the footsteps of the Fed, Bank of England and Bank of Japan by beginning to buy bonds in the secondary market. "FED PATIENT" The US Federal Reserve is "patient" no longer, Fed stays 'patient' but rate hikes are coming dropping the word cNN'°ney from its post -meeting 20 communique and telling the world that a 0 rate hike will likely Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 follow this year. 100 80 60 40 20 0 Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 The Six -Year Battle over Keystone XL - Reuters House votes to fast --track Mr. Obama's Keystone XL Easy Call on pipeline Keystone Bill - Politico - NYT "KEYSTONE PIPELINE" Interest in the pipeline project rebounds after an oil -carrying rail car crash. Source: Google Trends 90 ATTACHMENT 15 County Coun of Riverside ZU10 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund " Stuck in the Slow Lane " Remember that Friday after work, on the way up the Cajon Pass for the out of town family vacation? That's where you found yourself doing 45 mph behind the pickup truck pulling an oversized trailer, stuck in the slow lane. Try as you may, you just can't seem to get around for enough clear road to pick up speed and pass. Our national economy seems to also be experiencing this as well. It's no surprise though that we have had a slow- er start to economic growth so far this year; GDP growth has been diminished somewhat due in part to the mas- sive sell off in oil, severe winter weather on the East Coast and the Rust Belt, the West Coast port slowdown, and, widening trade deficits against a very strong dollar. We are also seeing continued weakness overseas as trade sanctions remain against Russia over its involvement with Ukraine and last years' takeover of Crimea. The Greek tragedy continues to play out as it decides wheth- er or not it will make debt payments to the IMF or its government workers. Sounds like a broken record but it remains to be seen if Greece continues to be a part of the Euro, or, if going back to the drachma is a possibility. Either way, hundreds of billions of Euro are at stake. The European Central Bank's recent announcement for its version of quantitative easing and the Bank of Eng- land's pass on raising rates are obviously not signs of unfettered growth and good times in the Eurozone, although their year-to-date stock market indices would suggest otherwise. Growth in China has softened up a bit with the Chinese government announcing it is now targeting GDP growth at 7 % vs. 7.5 % (still a big number). Furthermore war drums continue beating in the Middle East with Syria, Iraq and Iran in chaos due to ISIS and now a full blown civil war in Yemen. The geopolitical March risk there is the massive oil trade that flows through the narrow passage of the Gulf of Aden into the Red Sea; further uncertainty is assured. Back at home, U.S. jobless claims increased in March and were revised downward for January and February. The unemployment rate held in at 5.5 % but as we have dis- cussed before, this number does not include the labor participation rate, or U-6 total unemployment, currently at 10.9% for the month. We believe that there could be continued pain in the oil sector as lower prices force some wells to be idled and exploration and development to slow. Lower energy prices will provide stimulus for the economy as more dollars remain in the hands of the consumer, but it has not shown up in a big way as of yet. As was widely anticipated at the March 18th meeting, FOMC members acknowledged a slower economy with the FED dropping the language that it could be patient when beginning to normalize monetary policy. By re- moving the "patient" reference, it has placed itself in a better position to respond to positive economic data. This language opens the door to a potential rate hike as early as June, however, their economic projections also seem to indicate that meeting its goals of full employ- ment and 2% inflation are further down the road. So, it seems as if even the FED is isn't quite ready to accelerate by raising rates anytime soon. Don Kent Treasurer -Tax Collector Capital Markets Team Don Kent Treasurer -Tax Collector Jon Christensen Asst. Treasurer -Tax Collector Giovane Pizano Investment Manager Isela Licea Asst. Investment Manager Investment Objectives The primary objective of the treasurer shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds under the treasurer's control, meet the liquidity needs of the depositor, and achieve a return on the funds under his or her control. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATED: Aaa-bf BY MOODY'S INVESTOR'S SERVICE AND AAA/V1 BY FITCH RATINGS Month End Market Value ($)* Month End Book Value ($) Paper Gain or Paper Gain Book irs to Modified Loss ($) or Loss (%) Yield (%) Maturity Duration March February 5,730,402,540.40 5,728,600,174.74 1,802,365.66 0.03 0.46 1.25 1.22 5,517,030,770.65 5,517,608,884.48 (578,113.83) (0.01) 0.48 1.35 1.32 January 5,536,152,467.50 5,532,205,553.13 3,946,914.37 0.07 0.44 1.26 1.23 December November October 5,895,845,894.96 5,899,853,397.68 (4,007,502.72) (0.07) 0.43 1.24 1.21 4,813,034,831.17 4,811,717,725.40 1,317,105.77 0.03 0.46 1.42 1.39 4,619,489,691.81 4,619,977,432.54 (487,740.73) (0.01) 0.44 1.35 1.32 The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is comprised of the County, Schools, Special Districts91and other Discretionary Depositors. Current Market Data Economic Indicators Release Date Indicator Consensus Actual 03/06/2015 Non -Farm Payrolls M/M change: Counts the number of paid employees working part- time or full-time in the nation's business and government establishments. 230,000 295,000 03/06/2015 Employment Situation: Measures the number of unemployed as a percentage of the labor force. 5.6% 5.5% 03/25/2015 Durable Goods Orders - M/M change: Reflects the new orders placed with domestic 0.7% -1.4% manufacturers for immediate and future delivery of factory hard goods. 03/27/2015 Real Gross Domestic Product - Q/Q change: The broadest measure of aggregate economic activity and encompasses every sector of the economy. GDP is the country's most comprehensive economic scorecard. 2.4 % 2.2% 03/31/2015 Consumer Confidence: Measures consumer attitudes on present economic conditions 95.5 101.3 and expectations of future conditions. 03/05/2015 Factory Orders M/M change: Represents the dollar level of new orders for both 0.2% -0.2% durable and nondurable goods. 03/24/2015 Consumer Price Index - M/M change: The Consumer Price Index is a measure of the 0.2% 0.2% average price level of a fixed basket of goods and services purchased by consumers. Stock Indices Value Change Dow Jones (DJIA) $ 17,776.12 $ (356.58) S&P 500 Index $ 2,067.89 $ (36.61) NASDAQ (NDX) $ 4,333.68 $ (106.99) Commodities Change Nymex Crude $ 47.60 $ (2.16) Gold (USD/OZ) $ 1,183.68 $ (29.54) US Treasury Curve (M/M) ield Mid Conventional ' ; 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Fed Funds Target Rate ent Fed Funds Rate: 0-0.25 % Fed Move Probability for FOMC Dates: 04/29/2015 06/17/2015 Decrease to 0.00 % 50.0 % 44.0 % Increase to 0.25% 50.0 % 50.0 % Increase to 0.50% 0.0 % 6.0 % Increase to 0.75% 0.0% 0.0 % Increase to 1% 0.0 % 0.0 % FOMC Meeting Schedule Release Risk Assessment 28-Jan 18-Mar 0-.25 % 0-.25 Growth Growth 125 US Treasury Actives Curve 03/31/15 I25 US Treasury Actives Curve 02/27/15 Curve ID --.11.-- I2S 03/31/1S I2S 02/27/1S I25 t03131/15-02127/1 0.023 0.0131 1.371 1 S00 -12.4 2-537 2 541 -5.4 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR92 TIMMI The Treasurer's Institutional Money Market Index (TIMMI) is compiled and reported by the Riverside County Treasurer's Capital Markets division. It is a composite index derived from four AAA rated prime institutional money market funds. Similar to the Treasurer's Office, prime money market funds invest in a diversified portfolio of U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments including U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, commercial paper, certificates of deposits, repurchase agreements, etc. TIMMI is currently comprised of the five multi billion dollar funds listed below. AAA Rated Prime Institutional Money -Market Funds Fidelity Prime Institutional MMF Federated Prime Obligations Fund Wells Fargo Advantage Heritage FIPXX 0.09 % POIXX 0.05% WFJXX 0.10 % Morgan Stanley Institutional Prime Liquidity Fund M PFXX 0.07% JP Morgan CJ PXX 0.07% 1.00% 7 0.50% - 0.00% Pool Yield # TIMMI 0 0 0 0.44% 0.44% 0.46% o 0 a48% 0.46% 0.40% 0.37% 0.40% 0.42%0 0.41/0 0.42/0 0.43% 0.44% ` : � : i 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.04% 0.05% 0.05% 0.06% 0.06% 0.07% 0.08% Mar-14 Cash Flows May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 • Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 Required Actual Available Monthly Monthly Matured Investments to Invest > Mch h Receipts Disbursements Difference Investments Balar a Maturing 1 Year 04/2015 04/2015 1,375.00 950.00 425.00 05/2015 520.00 1,185.89 (665.89) 279.54 704.54 927.45 38.65 546.63 06/2015 750.00 1,220.61 (470.61) 431.96 - 493.37 07/2015 1,100.00 1,050.00 50.00 50.00 222.06 08/2015 725.00 850.00 (125.00) 75.00 - 178.34 09/2015 800.00 1,000.00 (200.00) 200.00 - 295.00 10/2015 975.00 1,150.00 (175.00) 175.00 - 181.16 11/2015 1,150.00 900.00 250.00 250.00 50.00 12/2015 1,900.00 975.00 925.00 1,175.00 100.00 01/2016 901.94 1,593.66 (691.72) 02/2016 875.00 1,000.00 (125.00) 03/2016 1,100.00 970.00 130.00 483.28 430.07 358.28 488.28 191.75 80.00 TOTALS 12,17194 12,845.16 (673.22) 881.96 3,827.57 15.40 % 3,695.83 64.52 % 4,846.64 84.60 % * All values reported in millions ($). The Pooled Investment Fund cash flow requirements are based upon a 12 month historical cash flow model. Based upon projected cash receipts and maturing investments, there are sufficient funds to meet future cash flow disbursements over the next 12 months. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOIP3 3 Asset Allocation Assets (000's) Scheduled Par REPOS 100,000.00 MMKT 335,000.00 CALTRUST FND 54,000.00 DDA/PASSBK 260,000.00 LOCAL AGCY OBLIG 395.00 US TREAS BONDS 435,000.00 FHLMC DISC NOTES 253,571.00 FHLMC BONDS 588,823.00 FNMA DISC NOTES 241,000.00 FNMA BONDS 593,674.00 FHLB DISC NOTES 150,000.00 FHLB BONDS 752,070.71 FFCB DISC NOTES 150,061.00 FFCB BONDS 674,766.00 FMAC DISC NOTES 75,000.00 FARMER MAC 258,850.00 MUNI ZERO CPNS 120,930.00 MUNI BONDS 44,855.00 COMM PAPER 641,500.00 Scheduled Book 100,000.00 335,000.00 54,000.00 260,000.00 395.00 435,092.58 253,355.98 588,821.44 240,856.66 593,813.28 149,885.15 752,006.24 149,962.67 674,799.12 74,853.48 258,837.00 120,872.56 44,845.77 641,203.25 Scheduled Market Mkt/ Sch Book Yield WAL (Yr) Mat (Yr) 100,000.00 335,000.00 54,000.00 260,000.00 395.00 435,309.40 253,471.27 589,442.60 240,893.40 593,777.22 149,951.63 752,252.35 150,031.44 674,777.08 74,917.25 259,106.32 120,916.25 44,845.77 641,315.57 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.05 % 100.05 % 100.11 % 100.02% 99.99 % 100.04% 100.03 % 100.05 100.00% 100.09 % 100.10 % 100.04 % 100.00% 100.02% 0.13 % 0.09% 0.42% 0.08 % 0.97% 0.36% 0.14% 1.17% 0.12% 0.75 % 0.14% 0.74% 0.11 % 0.28 % 0.22% 1.12% 0.15 % 0.31 % 0.15 % .003 .003 .003 .003 5.214 1.129 .359 1.771 .367 2.120 .400 1.538 .239 .971 .543 .439 .076 .557 .158 Totals (000's): 5,729,495.71 5,728,600.17 5,730,402.54 100.03% 0.46% .003 .003 .003 .003 5.214 1.129 .359 3.175 .367 2.278 .400 2.124 .239 .971 .543 3.026 .076 .557 .158 1.000.000.00 500,000,00 1 E f CALTRUST FND DDAIPASSBK LOCAL AGCY OBLIG FHLMC DISC NOTES FHLMC BONDS i FNMA DISC NOTES FNMA BONDS Scheduled Book Market FHLB DISC NOTES FHLB BONDS iA N �+ n O Z z m in V FV � W ID Li w FMAC DISC NOTES FARMER MAC MUM ZERO CPNS MUNI BONDS CC a. a. 6 X f O f.i SCHEDULED PAR G'o a REPOS-236 a MMKT -Gale a GALTRUST FND - /36 p DDA/ PASS8% - 59b a LOCAL AGLY OBLIG -Cr% o US TREAS BONDS • 896 o FNLMC DISC NOTES • 436 o FRIMCBONDS -10% p FNMA DISC NOTES - 4% a FNMA BONDS - 10% a FHLB DISC NOTES • 336 a FMB BONDS -13% FFCB DISC NOTES • 3% p FFCB BONDS -12.A> © FMAC DISC MOTES - 1% M FARMER MAC - 5% a MUNI ZERO CMS . Z36 a MUNI BONDS - 136 a COMM PAPER - 11% COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX COL- 94 Maturity Distribution SchilliM00's) REPO MMKT CALTRUST FND DDA/PASSBK 0-1 2-3 Yr >3 Yr Totals (000's) ji 100,000.00 - 100,000.00 335,000.00 335,000.00 54,000.00 - - - 54,000.00 260,000.00 - - - 260,000.00 LOCAL AGCY OBLIG 395.00 395.00 US TREAS BONDS - 175,000.00 225,000.00 35,000.00 435,000.00 FHLMC DISC NOTES 86,571.00 167,000.00 - - - 253,571.00 FHLMC BONDS FNMA DISC NOTES FNMA BONDS FHLB DISC NOTES FHLB BONDS FFCB DISC NOTES FFCB BONDS FMAC DISC NOTES FARMER MAC MUNI ZERO CPNS MUNI BONDS COMM PAPER - 80,000.00 160,130.00 34,500.00 314,193.00 588,823.00 50,000.00 191,000.00 - 241,000.00 65,000.00 15,000.00 156,887.00 254,452.00 102,335.00 593,674.00 - 150,000.00 - 150,000.00 5,000.00 324,500.00 103,185.71 35,000.00 284,385.00 752,070.71 90,000.00 60,061.00 150,061.00 148,150.00 344,320.00 117,296.00 15,000.00 50,000.00 674,766.00 25,000.00 50,000.00 - 75,000.00 - 85,000.00 15,000.00 8,850.00 150,000.00 258,850.00 38,450.00 82,480.00 - - - - 120,930.00 11,295.00 21,490.00 12,070.00 - - 44,855.00 140,000.00 426,500.00 75,000.00 - - 641,500.00 Totals (000's): 11F7,450.00 989,996.00 789,568.71 382,802.00 901,308.00 5,729,495.71 16.19% 17.28% 30.34% 13.78% 6.68% 15.73% Cumulative% 16.19% 33.47% 63.81% 77.59% 84.27% 100.00% SCHEDU L CO PAR {OUO'sj I REPOS-Schedued Par h� MM KT•Scheduled Par MISR CALTRUST FND- Scheduled Par ODA! PASSBK - Scheduled Pa r ow+ LOCAL AGCY OBLIG -Scheduled Par US TREAS BONDS - Scheduled Per Fill MC DISC NOTES -Scheduled Par FHL MC BONDS • Scheduled Per FNMA DISC NOTES -Sched Wed Par FNMA BONDS - Scheduled Par FHLB DISC NOTES - Scheduled Per h� FHLB BONDS • Scheduled Par PECS 01SC NOTES - Scheduled Par FFCB BONDS -Scheduled Par FMAC DISC NOTES • Scheduled Par FARMER MAC • Scheduled Par MUNI ZERO CPNS - Scheduled Par MUNI BONDS - Scheduled Par COMM PAPER • Scheduled Par COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOk6 5 Credit Quality boon) et MKT/Booli Yield Aaa 4,190,430.71 4,190,115.81 4,191,402.40 100.03% 0.53 % Aa 30,000.00 29,975.17 29,984.80 100.03% 0.29% Aa1 8,335.00 8,327.92 8,327.92 100.00 % 0.23 % Aa2 499,295.00 499,068.42 499,160.97 100.02% 0.15% Aa3 337,190.00 337,027.39 337,113.79 100.03% 0.15% NR 639,245.00 639,126.10 639,440.42 100.05 % 0.45 ° NA 25,000.00 24,959.38 24,972.25 100.05 % 0.20 % Totals (000's): MOODY'S BOOK 4!a MAea-23% ElAel•o?c 1.43.6% ❑NA•Dyu MA1•196 111,42-9'o MHR-11°/0 S&P BOOK�a mAAA -8?a 1111AA-6?n EHR•1151 IMAA+-693ro AAA--65.o EHA-Odb Market MKT/Book AAA 436,465.00 436,446.06 436,496.65 100.01 % 0.16 % AA+ 3,938,595.71 3,938,200.15 3,939,468.13 100.03% 0.56 % AA 353,000.00 352,841.10 352,911.31 100.02% 0.15% AA- 337,190.00 337,027.39 337,113.79 100.03% 0.15% NR 639,245.00 639,126.10 639,440.42 100.05 % 0.45 % NA 25,000.00 24,959.38 24,972.25 100.05 % 0.20 % COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOI)6 L 1I0.LJff110J XVI-1I31IfISV3?II HQISI?IHAI?I 30 kthlfIOJ L6 6861 L9L17 00'006'6Z 00'006'6Z0'SI 000961'OO1 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'ST 5791 5791 OZOZ/5Z/E0 9°YX£°N1A5 DIN1H3 1/019O17E1E b861 9171 00'008'0Z 00'008'0Z0'0I 00080Z'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSL'I OSCI OZOZ/EZ/EO 9°YX£11‘11.I5 DIN1H3 EII9O17EIE ES61 ZZL'b 00'0017E 00'0017E0'0Z OOOZ9T'OOT 00'000'000'0Z 00'000'000'0Z OOL'I OOL'I OZOZ/ZI/EO 9°YX£11‘11i5 DIN1H3 5XO9O17EIE 5T61 E6917 00'006'0Z 00'006'0Z0'0I 00060Z'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 009'I 0091 OZOZ/LZ/ZO 9°YX£11‘11.l4 DIN1H3 SVa9O17E1E E997 9097 00'00VOZ 00'00VOZO'SI 0009ET'OOI 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'ST SZI'I GUI LIOZ/6/TI 9°WE>NxTSL'Z DIN1H3 6199O17E1E SOVZ E9E7 00'006'SI 00'006'510'0T 000651'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 000'I 000'I Zia/a/80 3°YX911,11 %57 JITIH3 1599O17E1E 9E9'I fil8'I 00'OOL'LI- 00'OOE786'6 OOOEZ8'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00C 00C Zia/OE/TO 3°1X91N1AZ DIN1H3 IVV9O17ElE E691 I1917 00'0017- 00'009'L66'6 0009L6'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 009'I 009'I OZOZ/6I/ZO 9°YX£°N1A5 JW1113 90'19O17E1E 9E9'I IZ8'I 00'OOL'LI- 00'OOE786'6 OOOEZ8'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T Oa 00C LIOZ/OE/TO 3°YX9°N.IZ JYXIH3 IVV9O17ElE 9E91 L8ST 00'OOE'S 00'OOE'800'0I OOOE80'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 058'I O58'I OZOZ/OE/TO 9°YX£11‘11I5 DIAIH3 9JIX5O17E1E ESL'b EIS'b 00'OOi 00'OO'1'000'0T OOO'100'OOL 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 008'I 008'I 6I0Z/0E/ZI 9°YX£°NTAS JW1113 TXR5O17E1E ESL'I ZECI 00'005'9E 00'005'9E0'5Z 000911:00I 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ OSC OSC 9I0Z/0E/ZI 31XPINTAZ JW1113 6VMS017EIE 0081 T957 00'008'S 00'008'500'0T 000850'OOL 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSCI NCI OZOZ/9I/T0 9°YX£°NTA5 JYIIIH3 ZMA5O17EIE ZSZ'Z EZZZ 00'581/SI 00'580105'6 O00070'OOT 00'009'886'6 00'000'005'6 6170'I 000'I LIOZ/0090 9°M11° 11,57 DIN1H3 On55O17CW 1786'I 6561 09'EL61I OVZI87IS'S 000Z11:00I OS'Eb8'L66'S 00'000'505'S 606' 058' LIOZ/bZ/EO a°WE>NxTSZZ DIN1H3 EISSObEIE £ZL'I 6691 00'05Z'8 00'O57'96611 OOO5L6'66 00'000'8861T 00'000'000'ST O6L' OSC 9I0Z/6I/ZI 9°YX£1NIXZ DIN1H3 Z955O17EIE 65I'I 6b1'1 00'009- 00'006'E661T 000956'66 00'00016611 00'000'000'ST La Oa 910Z/a/50 9°WW1° 11i£DIN1H3 0M1 17EIE CELT Oaf, 00'OOZ'05 00'OOZ'050'0Z OOOTSZ'OOL 00'000'000'0Z 00'000'000'0Z 009'I 009'I 6I0Z/bZ/ZI VIH911\11X; DIN1H3 LTISSObEIE 0991 Ertl 00'OOE'6Z 00'OOE1Z0'0I 000E1V00I 00'000'566'6 00'000'000'0T 09L'I OSCI 6I0Z/9Z/TI 9°YX£11‘11i5 DIN1H3 ££d5O17EIE 0991 Ertl 00'0591I 00'0591IO'S 000E17'001 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S OSCI OSCI 6I0Z/9Z/TI 9°YX£11‘11i5 DIN1H3 9ON5O17EIE 11,91 Ertl 00.009'0Z 00'009'0Z0'0I 00090Z'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 579'I 579'I 6I0Z/OZ/TI 9°YX£11‘11i5 DIN1H3 aN5O17EIE 0991 Ertl OV9Lb'0£ OV9LVOIVEI OOOE£Z'OOI 00'000'080'EI 00'000'080'EI OSCI NCI 6I0Z/9Z/TI 9°YX£11‘11.I5 DIN1H3 9ON5O17ElE IZI'I TIT'T 00'05Z'EZ- 00'05L'I£0'SZ OOOLZT'OOI 00'005'550'5Z 00'000'000'SZ OSE' Oa 9I0Z/EI/50 �.11 DIN1H3 6OaV3LElE £69' Z89' 00'005'9E- 00'OO5'E96'61 OOOLZ6'66 00'000'000'05 00'000'000'05 OLZ' OLZ' SIOZ/60/ZI 3°YX911\11.II DIN1H3 EldSObEIE 816'I 8681 00'05Z'SI 00'054'510'5f 000501'OOI 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'ST OW OSC LIOZ/8Z/Z0 3°W9>1\IxTSZ7 DIN1H3 ZAN5O17ElE 0991 EZb'b 00'OOE1Z 00'00£1Z0'01 000E1V00I 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSCI NCI 6I0Z/9Z/TI 9°YX£°1‘11l6 DIAIH3 ££d5O17ElE 0991 6E1;17 00'0557£ 00'0557£0'ST OOOLIZ'OOI 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'ST 579'I 579'I 6I0Z/9Z/TI 9°INPN1A5 JW1H3 9915O17E1E £69' Z89' 00'0S7'8I- 00'05L1861Z OOOLZ6'66 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ OLZ' OLZ' SIOZ/60/ZI 9°YX9°Na II JYIIIH3 EldSObEIE 0991 EZb'b 00'OOE'EZ 00'OOE'EZO'OI 000E£7'001 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSCI NCI 6I0Z/9Z/TI 9°YX£°N1X5 DIN1H3 9ON5O17ElE 11,91 6017 88'8IE'0I 88'8IE'EL8'S 0009LT'OOI 00'000'E98'S 00'000'E98'S 005'I 005'I 6I0Z/OZ/TI 9°YX£3NIXS JYX1H3 EM15O17EIE EE” I9Z1, 007LVS 007LVSOZ'E 000111'00I 00'000'OOZ'E 00'000'OOZ'E OOS'I Oat 610Z/170/60 9°YX£1NIXS JYX1H3 EnO5O17EIE 99b'b T9Z'b 00'OOL'OZ 00'OOL'OZO'OI OOOLOZ'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T S79'I S79'I 610Z/91/60 9°W9a1‘11i5 JYX1H3 LX0S017EIE NVT bZZ'b 00'OOZ'OZ 00'OOZ'OZO'OI OOOZOZ'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OOL'I OOCI 610Z/8Z/80 11°W9aN1X5 JYX1H3 IW0S017ElE NVT bZZ'b 00'OOZ'OZ 00'OOZ'OZO'OI OOOZOZ'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OOL'I OOCI 610Z/8Z/80 9°W91NIXS JYXIH3 IW0S017ElE 56E1 9ZZ17 O57178'LI O57178aV6 000561'OOI 00'000'05'1'6 00'000'05'1'6 005'I Oat 6I0Z/IZ/80 8°W9a1‘11.I5 JYX1H3 5L35O1.ElE Z6£'b 9611 00'OOTOZ 00'OOI'OZO'OI OOOIOZ'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSCI OSCI 610Z/0Z/80 9°YX£°NIXS JYX1H3 8935O17E1E 56E1 9ZZ1 00'05a6 00'05a600'S 000561'OOI 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 005'I 005'I 6I0Z/IZ/80 9°W£aNIXS JYX1H3 5L35O17EIE IZL'E 565'E 00'005'9I 00'005'9'10'OT 000591'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T SLE'I SLEI HIOZ/9T/ZI SWAN NIC5 JYX1H3 88411O17EIE IZC£ b95'E 00'05I'EI 00'05I'EIO'S OOOE9Z'OOI 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 005'I Oat HIOZ/9T/ZI 8°YV9aNa.I5 JYX1H3 I9416O17EIE 09VI Ebb'I 00'OOL'0I- 00'OOE'6861 00098C66 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 059' OS9' 9I0Z/bT/60 9°Y,IPN1.I5'£ JYX1H3 bI9E017ElE 09VI Ebb'I 00'OOa6- 00'OOE'6861 00098C66 00'000'666'1 00'000'000'S 959' OS9' 9I0Z/Ni60 9°YX£°Nai£ JYX1H3 bI9E017EIE 09VI Eb6'I 00'OOL'0I- 00'OOE'6861 00098C66 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 059' OS9' 9I0Z/bT/60 9°YX£°NIXS'£ JYX1H3 bI9E017EIE Z6S'I 695'1 Grail O5751'0£91 000311'00I S710V6Z91 00'000'SZ91 009' S79' 9I0Z/I0/TI lib JYX1H3 OSSEObEIE 56L' 98C 00'058'S 00'058'S00'S OOOLII'OOI 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S OSV OSV 9I0Z/5I/T0 31ii°1‘11i£ JYX1H3 63£E017EIE Z65'I 695'1 00.009'0Z 00'0081'10'0T 000311'00I 00'OOZ'166'6 00'000'000'0T Lb9' S79' 9I0Z/I0/TI .xb DIN1H3 OSS£ObEIE SONOB JIN1113 �S£' £978Z'SIT LL'Sn'ILV£SZ 8990%'66 bi'£86'SS£'£SZ 00'000'IL5£SZ 61,17' 817V £8.5W9 00'057'580Z OOO1176'66 LI'b0Y6L617Z 00.000'000'5Z OLI' OW SIOZ/II/60 310N JSIa JYII7H3 91196££I£ 61,17' 81"V L916aE 00'O57'5861Z 00011'6'66 £E'8511861Z 00'000'000'5Z at Z51' 5I0Z/II/60 3ION JSIGOIN1H3 91196E£I£ 955' 5a LI'1581 00'05Z'6L61Z OOOLI6'66 £8'96E'LL61Z 00'000'000'SZ OSV OH' SIOZ/OZ/OI 3ION 0SIa-JYX1H3 631N96££I£ EST ZS5 £E'E£8'Z 00'005'6L61Z OOO816'66 L9'999'9L61Z 00'000'000'5Z at at 5I0Z/6I/0I 310N JSIa JYX1H3 IaN96££I£ bEE' b££' L9'908'01 00'0ZE'Z661£ 0009L6'66 £EEIS1861£ 00'000'000'a 8TI' 811' 510Z/IE/a 3ION 0SIa-JYX1H3 9A196£EI£ 90Z' 80Z' 06705'8 LC561'69511 OOOL86'66 L8786'095'11 00'000'IL5'II SLI' SLI' 5I0Z/51/90 3ION JSIGOIA11H3 5XO96££I£ 11Z' ELZ' Z6769'11 00'05a9661Z OOOL86'66 80750'5861Z 00'000'000'5Z at at HOZ/LI/90 3ION 0SIa-JYX1H3 OZO96£EI£ bIZ' ELZ' Z6769'11 00'05a9661Z OOOL86'66 80750'586'1Z 00'000'000'5Z at at HOZ/LI/90 3ION 0SIa-JYX1H3 OZO96£EI£ NZ' ELZ' O5790'ZI 00'05a9661Z OOOL86'66 O57891861Z 00'000'000'5Z at at SIOZ/LT/90 3ZON 0SIa-JYX1H3 OZO96££I£ 1'8E' £8£' ZZ771'9Z 00'008'Z66'6I OOO196'66 8L7LE'996'6I 00'000'000'0Z OLI' Oa' SIOZ/8I/80 3ZON 0SIa-JYX1H3 L.0196£EIE La' 9LZ' O5791'6I 00'05VZ661I 000186'66 O5789'LL61l 00'000'000'5I at at SIOZ/OT/LO 3ZON JSIa-JYX1113 ZAH96£EIE S3ZON JSIa DIAHH3 - 611'1 SS'IZ8'91Z 00'OOb'60£'S£b 9ZITL0'OOT ST'8LS$60'S£b 9Zi'I 611'I L£'17£L'6 00'000'LS6'6b OOO1716'66 £9'99Z'Lb6'6b 56C LSL' 9510911 00'OSZ'670'57 OOOLII'OOi bb'8179'HO'SZ 9ZI'I 8II'I SL'£60'L£ 00'OOS'8L6'1,Z OOOb16'66 SZ'90b'ib61Z S6C L8L' 88'917- 00'0SZ'6Z0'SZ OOOLIVOOT 88'96Z'6Z0'SZ 8£8' T£8' SZ'906'E 00.0571£0'g OOOSZVOOT SCEb£'LZO'SZ 9Z1.1. 6IT1 00'9L8'S- 00'OO9'8L61Z OOOb16'66 00.9 E1861Z 816' SI6' SZ'906'S- 00.000'8661Z OOOZ66'66 SZ'906'E00'SZ Ib8'I SI8'I 6I'LIT'b£ 00.00019.1'g 000969'OOT I8'Z88'6WSZ 9ZI'I 611'1 IE'OZ8'9 00'OO9'8L61Z OOOb16'66 69'6L9'1L61Z 9ZI'I 811'1 9S'9ZCOI 00'OO9'8L61Z OOOb16'66 bb'ELL'L961Z 9ZI'I 811'1 9S'9ZCOI 00'OO9'8L61Z OOOb16'66 bb'ELL'L961Z 9ZL7 E607 99109'89 00'0SL'OWSZ OOOE99'OOT bb'8bI'LLO'SZ 9ZI'I 6IT'T IVOZ8'9 00'OO9'8L61Z OOOb16'66 69'6L9'1L61Z S6C L8C 6I'L9V8Z- 00'0SZ'6Z0'SZ OOOLIVOOT 6I'LI9'LSO'SZ S6C L8C 18'96911- 00'0SZ'6Z0'SZ OOOLIVOOT IE'Sb6'070'SZ S6C L8C 99109'81- 00'0SZ'6Z0'SZ OOOLIVOOT 991S8'Lb0'SZ ZSZZ TZZZ 00'SLZ'8£ 00'OST'OIO'S OOOEOZ'OOT 00'SL8'IL61 ZZbZ 68E7 Z9'068'ES 00.0001661 OOOOZ8'66 8£'60I'L£61 VIZ'S OLS'Z = 00'000'S6£ 000000'001 00'000'96£ 00'000'000'S£b 00'000'000'0S 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'5Z 00.000'000'S 00.000'000'S 00'000'S6E 6ZE' OZE' Sib' L9Z' SLZ' Z6Z' 8£Z' Lb9' IZ£' SEE' SEE' ZSL' bZ£' 181' LEZ' SZZ' ZE6' £IO'I £' OSZ' SZE' OSZ' SL£' SL£' OSZ' OSZ' SL8' OSZ' OSZ' OSZ' SL8' OSZ' SL£' SL£' SL£' OSZ' SZ9' SL6' 9I0Z/SI/50 910Z/SI/IO 910Z/SI/SO 9IOZ/ST/TO 9IOZ/IE/TO 9IOZ/SI/SO 9I0ZAZ/ZO aNOO x2In5V3211'S'R aNOa )0111SV3211'ST1 aNOa ANT1SV3211'ST1 aNOa I3nsVD.11 R aNOa I3nsVD.11 R aNOa I3nsVD.11 R aNOa I3nsVD.11 R LIOZ/IE/TO aNOa IunsVaul'S'R 9IOZ/ST/50 aNOa I3nsVD.11 R 9IOZ/SI/SO aNOa I3nsVD.11 R 9IOZ/SI/SO aNOa I3nsVD.11 R LIOZ/ST/50 alloa IunsVaul'S'R 9IOZ/ST/50 alloa lunsV3u1'S'R 9IOZ/SI/T0 aNO9 lunsV3u1'S'R 9IOZ/SI/T0 aNOa I3nsVD.11 R 9IOZ/SI/T0 aNOa I3nsVD.11 R LIOZ/0E/90 aNO11 I3nsVD.I1 R 91118Z8Z16 LIOZ/IE/80 aNOa lunsVaal'S'R ZYX18Z8ZI6 SONOa SVala SR IOASZSZI6 E0f1SZSZI6 IDASZSZI6 £on8Z8Z16 Iba8Z8Z16 TJASZSZI6 Z898Z8ZI6 SJSSZSZL6 TJASZSZI6 TJASZSZI6 TJASZSZL6 6HMSZSZI6 IJA8Z8ZI6 £JR8Z8ZI6 £JR8Z8ZI6 £JR8Z8ZI6 NZ'S OL57 00'0 00'000'56£ 000000'00T 0f000-S6£ £00' £. SOO. E00' 00'0 £00' SOO. E00' 00'0 00'000'S6£ SL6' SL6 OZOZ/ST/90 3SROHZunOJ!SIG SR OV1 OnaoAJ0V 1VOO1 00'000'000'09Z 000000'00J 00'000'000'09Z 00'000'000'09Z O80' 080' 00'000'000'09Z 000000'0a 00'000'000'09Z 00'000'000'09Z OSO. 080. SI&/10/b0 TINS 03OVNVW an HSVO mussvd/Vaa 00'000'0001S 000000'001 00'000'0001S 00'000'0001S IZ17' IZb' 00.000'000'S5 000000'00T 00.000'000'b5 W000'000'1,5 ITV SIOZ/I0/170 Mal ,LHS.LSnu.L1VJ N.L1J aN3.I50N.IIV3 £00' £00' 00'000'000'SEE 000000'001 00'000'000'SEE 00'000'000'SEE 660' NO' £00' E00' 00'0 00'000'000'0£ 000000'001 00'000'000'0£ 00'000'000'0E 170' 170' 510Z/10/10 dVdRId NV0110YX di' )0C3IJ £00' E00' 00'0 00.000'000'0T 000000.00T 00.000'000'0T 00.000'000'0T I90' I90' SIOZ/10/b0 3WIud l31NVIS NV0110YX XX3dIN E00' £00' 00'0 00'000'000'0i 000000'00i 00'000'000'0i 00'000'000'0i Sb0' Sb0' SIOZ/I0/b0 3IT12I3 auvliaaad XX101 E00' £00' 00'0 00'000'000'SS 000000'OOi 00'000'000'9S 00'000'000'9S I60' 160' SIOZ/I0/b0 awnid iIIl3ald XXdld COO' £00' 00'0 00.000'000'00Z 000000'00i 00.000'000'00Z 00.000'000'00Z ZOI' ZOI' SIOZ/I0/1,0 3OVID1381asn2ll1V0 XXIdM .INWN I £00' 00'0 00'000'000'00I 000000'OO.1 00'000'000'00I 00'000'000'00I 0£L' Uff• £00' COO. 00.0 00.000'000'OOi 000000.00i 00.000'000'OOi 00.000'000'OOi SIOZ/IO/b0 ddM - 01321 (Mail SOd3H 0N113100d I:Pun3 61p.VINI uoyema oysmaZ PalpPoil sso-LAIpp 991.A and 991,A anleA dlpuleNl uodnop alea uopdpasaa dISRJ PazT[eausR 1.1FLIAI 1a>pew Moog aed °Z MIA LlpuleNl ssuanua 0TT03p0d Pua wow 8 ?IO.LJHTIOJ XVI-2I32If1SVINI HQISRIHARI 10 kthlf10J 86 ILO'£ 010.E 05160, 09160,58'8 000640'00I 00'000'058'8 00'000'05£'8 058' 0S8' 8i0Z/SZ/h0 floW£oN.V.S 911-Id ZddZ8£E1E ILO'£ WYE 00'006'8 00'006'800'0T 0006E0'00i 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 006' 006' 8i0Z/SZ/h0 5101AI9oN.V.5 911-Id OHN8££IE ZES'Z Z6,7 00'00L 00'01:n00'0T 001/L00'00" 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 05L' OSL' LTOZ/OI/OT floWEoNYAS 91Hd Z1(1085818 Zb1' ZVI' 00'059'Z 00'059'Z00'S 000550'001 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'S 005' OOS' STOZ/ZZ/SO .V.£91H3 S0V8L£EIE SONO9 TIM _ 66£' ZL'SL5'99 00'SZ9'IS6'691 OSLL96'66 8Z'6VeS88'691 001000'000'OSL 9EI' 9EL' SU' 9Z9' L81LZ'L 9550£'686'6Z ZZZLS6.66 SC£60786'6Z 00.000'000'SZ S£1' 5£L' SLOZ/Z0/60 RION DSla 9"1H3 431B8££I£ ZZ9' OZ9' 9£8S6'£L LI'9EL7861,Z 1160E6'66 5L'LLL'896'6Z 00.000'000'SZ 091' 09C SLOZ/EI/IL RION JSIO 811-1d £H08££IE 81£' Lb£' LI19£7Z 00'005'686'6, 0006L6'66 688EI'L96'6D 00'000'000'0S OCT' 0£L' SLOZ/50/80 3LON JSIO 911-11 9V)1b8££1£ 6Z£' 8Z£' 17b,1,67Z £5'580'066'617 L91086'66 688£I'L96'66 00'000'000'05 NV 0£i' STOZ/6Z/L0 3LON JSIO 91Hd LZff8££1E S3.LON JSIO TIM BLZZ '690'9E- 6S9IZ'LLL'£6S 98£LIO'0OL OCLSZ'£I8'£6S 968, L89, SL'£E6'9Z- 5Z'995'8E6'6 0005£C66 00'000'5L6'6 00'000'SL6'6 0051 0051 OZOZ/OZ/ZO 9oW9>N+A5 VIAIN3 17MOZ09EIE La, L99, 00.001, ZZ 00.001,7ZO'01 OOObZZ'OOL 00'000'000'N 00'000'000'N 0051 0051 OZOZ/EI/ZO 9oW9>N+AS V1\11\13 LOOZ09EIE 95I' 9ST. 00'05L,8- 00'05Z'STO'SZ 000190'001 00'000'001'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 6I1' OOS' STOZ/LZ/SO +NI VIAIN3 fiWNOOSEIE 95I' 9SL' 097061L- 00'00Z7L0'0Z 000190'001 097011,80'0Z 00'000'000'0Z L51' OOS' STOZ/LZ/SO xNSZ1 VIAIN3 fiWNOOSEIE 95L' 9SL' 00'000'99- 00'00Z7L0'0Z 000190'001 00'00Z'8L0'0Z 00'000'000'0Z Z81' OOS' STOZ/LZ/SO .,AI VIAIN3 fiWNOOSEIE £0Z'£ 69L'E 00'005'86 00'008'600'N 000860'001 00'0051.T6'6 00'000'000'N LL01 058' 8I0Z/ZI/90 9oW9>N+AS VIAIN3 Of1WL09EIE 999.E 079'1 8801911 88'9Z8'05L 00011866 008TZ'6EL 00'00075L 6001 005' 9I0Z/8Z/II 9+AI>N+.15'£dWN3 bZ1L09E1E 089.E 809.E 00'009'9- 00'006'£66'6 000186'66 00'000'000'N 00'000'000'N 009' 009' 9I0Z/SI/II 9+AI>N+.15'£dWN3 8SMOOSEIE 089.E 809.E 00'00I'5- 00.00V566'6 000/E6'66 00'005'866'6 00'000'000'N 1709' 009' 9I0Z/5I/II 9+AI>N+.15'£dWN3 8SMOOSEIE 089.E 809.E 0I'66£7- 06'0097E9'£ 000/E6'66 00'000'5E9'£ 00'000'5E9'£ 009' 009' 9I0Z/5I/II 9+AI>N+.15'£dWN3 8SMOOSEIE 999.E L191 00.0091T- 00'00b$86'6 0005178'66 00'000'966'6 00'000'000'N Zig 005' 9I0Z/8Z/II 9+AI>N+AS'£ VIAIN3 trIT098I8 LOI'£ L170'E 05'LT9'LT 05'LT9'L9L'IZ 000180'001 00'000'05LIZ 00'000'05L1Z 006' 006 8IOZ/80/50 901A19>N+7,5 VIAIN3 8MNI09ElE S80'£ E£0'E 00'0057 00'005700'5 000050'00T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 05L' OSL' 8IOZ/0£/10 901AI9>N+AS tlWN3 LINIO9EIE 089.E 809.E 00'005'5- 00'0(0966, 000/E6'66 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'S 009' 009' 9I0Z/5I/II 3+NI>N+NS'£VWNd 8SMOOSEIE 0891 809.E 00'009'9- 00.00r£66'6 000/E6'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 009' 009' 910Z/5I/II 3+AI>1\1+A5'£ VIAIN1 8SMOOSEIE 0891 809.E 00'005'5- 00'00L'966$ 00017£6'66 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 009' 009' 9I0Z/5I/II 3ijs.I>N.7NS'£ VIAIN3 8SMOOSEIE 0891 809.E 00'008'8- 00'00L'966, 00017E6'66 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 009' 009' 9I0Z/SI/II H+NI>N+NS'£ VIAIN3 SSMOOSEIE 0891 809.E 00'00£'£` 00'00L'966, 00017E6'66 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 009' 009' 9I0Z/SI/II H.V.PWAS'£ VIAIN3 8SMOOSEIE 5%1. EZL'L 00'0ZI'ZI- 00'08b,661L 000,56'66 00'009'9007T 00'000'0007T S99' 089' 9I0Z/LZ/ZI 9oW931•1+NS'£ VIAIN3 £3bT09ElE LOI'£ L170'E 00'050, 00'050,00'S 000180'001 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'5 006' 006' 8IOZ/80/50 9o1A193N.X5 VIAIN3 8MNI09EIE 0£91 8091 00'009'9- 00.00r£66'6 00017E6'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 009' 009' 9I0Z/SI/II 9+NI>N+N5'£ VIAIN3 8SMOOSEIE Z50'£ E667 OVL061 OVL06119'5 00017E0'0N 00'000'019'5 00'000'019'5 0001 0001 8I0Z/8I/170 901A193N+N5 VIAIN3 0MIL09EIE 0£91 8091 00'009'9- 00.00r£66'6 00017E6'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 009' 009' WOZ/SI/IT 9oW9>N+N5'£ VIAIN3 8SMOOSEIE ELSE ZS51 00'001/9 00'00T/900'0Z 000Z£0'00I 00'000'000'0Z 00'000'000'0Z S79' SZ9' WOZ/SZ/OI 9oW9>N+I5'£VWN3 E1M00SEIE L10'£ 6867 00'0081 00'008100'5 0009Z0'00I 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 SL8' 5L8 SLOZ/9I/170 £PAI>N+IS VIAIN3 6flNIO9EIE ELSE ZS51 00'00Z'£ 00'00Z'£00'0I 000Z£0'00I 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T S79' S79' WOZ/S7/0I 9oW9>NA5'£VWN3 E1M00SEIE ELSE ZSSL 00'00Z'£ 00'00Z'£00'0I 000Z£0'00I 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T S79' S79' WOZ/S7/0I 9oW9>N+A5'£VIAIN3 E1M00SEIE ELSE ZSSL 00'0091 00'009100'5 000Z£0'00I 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 S79' SZ9' WOZ/S7/0I floW9>N+A5'£VWN3 C1M00SEIE 580'£ E£0'E 00'000'5 00'000'500'0T 000050'0N 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 05L' 05C 8IOZ/0£/10 11o1A19>N+A5 VIAIN3 LINI09EIE L10'£ 6867 00'009'Z 00'009700'0T 0009Z0'00I 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T SL8' 5L8 8I0Z/9I/10 JoW9>N+1C5 VIAIN3 6flNIO9EIE 890'£ OWE 00'001/£ 00'00T/800'0T 00017£0'0N 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 008' 008' 8I0Z/6Z/10 JoW9>N+A5 VIAIN3 9AII09EIE £6b1 9L171 00'059$- 00'058'566, 00( 06'66 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 059' 059' 910Z/9Z/60 floW9>N+NE VWN3 EOAOOSEIE 5667 L/67 00'00L'8I- 00'006186, 000889'66 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 0001 0001 8IOZ/8Z/£0 fl.TATN\PAS tlWN3 L3HI09EIE £L67 9Z67 00'006'6 00'05L'900'5 00087L'OOL 00'057'966, 00'000'000'5 ZZ01 0001 8IOZ/OZ/£0 floINPN+A5 tlWN3 Z3111.09EIE 5667 L/67 00'0S£'TI 00'05£1I0'5 OOOLZZ'OOT 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 0001 0001 8I0Z/8Z/£0 fl+ll>N+AS tlWN3 8flITIO9EIE 5667 8/67 00'0SZ'S 00'OSZ'500'5 000501'00T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 058' 058' 8I0Z/8Z/£0 fl.V.PN+AS tlWN3 9JHI09EIE OL67 E167 00'0057I 00'0057I0'0I 0005ZVOOL 00'000'000'N 00'000'000'N OZI'I OM 8I0Z/61/£0 flo1A19>1\1+A5 tlWN3 6M31.09EIE 961,1 086'1 00'00Z7 00'00Z700'S 0001,1,0'00T 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S SZ9' SZ9' 9I0Z/LZ/60 irIAIP +NS'£ VP' 6H0109£1£ 961,1 OWT 00'OLO, 00'0Z1,70S'S 0001,1,0'00T 00'058'861/S 00'000'00S'S 1£9' SZ9' 9I0Z/LZ/60 90W9>N+AS'£ VW1•14 6H0109£1£ Z66'Z L1,67 00'058'Z 00'058700'S OOOLWOOT 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 009' 008' 8I0Z/LZ/£0 9+AL>N+LS VIAIN3 £1,10I09£1£ Z667 5567 00'00Z'8 00'00Z'800'5 0001790'00T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 0001 0001 8I0Z/LZ/80 floW9>1\1+A5 VWN3 Z90109E18 OL67 E167 00'0S7'9 00'057'900'5 0005ZVOOT 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 OM OM 8I0Z/61/£0 flo1/49>1\1+A5 VWN3 6M31.09EIE OL67 E167 00'0057I 00'0057'0'0T 0005ZVOOT 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OM OM 8I0Z/61/£0 floNI9>N+A5 VWN3 6M31.09EIE OL67 E167 00'005'L 00'057'900'5 0005ZVOOT 00'09L'866, 00'000'000'5 8Z1'I OM 8I0Z/61/£0 floW9>N+A5 VWN3 6M3I09EIE b867 6L87 00'000'8 00'000'800'0T 000080'00T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 0001 0001 810Z/90/E0 901N9>1\1,AS VIAIN3 ZZHI09EIE 8167 8987 00'005'EI 00'005'EI0'N 000581'00T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OZI'I OM 8I0Z/8Z/Z0 901V9>1\+AS VIAIN3 ZflO1.098TE 9687 1187 00'0SVII 00'000'500'5 000001'00T 00'05L'E66'6 00'000'000'5 Z501 0001 8I0Z/OZ/Z0 fl+NL>N+AS VIAIN3 LMOI09EIE 8167 8987 00'005'EI 00'005'EI0'0T 000581'00T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OZI'I NU 8I0Z/8Z/Z0 floW9>N+A5 VIAIN3 ZflO1.098TE 8167 5987 00'009'9 00'008'500'5 000901'00T 00'005'866, 00'000'000'5 9001 0001 8I0Z/8Z/Z0 fl.1/..PMAS VIAIN3 WUID9EIE 8167 5987 00'009'0I 00'009'0I0'0T 000901'00T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 0001 0001 8I0Z/8Z/Z0 EI.TKP +AS VIAIN3 WUID9EIE 8167 5L87 00'0567I 00'05,7.10'5T 000E80'00T 00'000'000'5I 00'000'000'5I 008' 008' 8I0Z/8Z/Z0 EI.TKP +AS VIAIN3 L601.09EIE 8E87 L8L7 00.00V8 00'00Z'800'0I 000Z80'00T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 05Z1 05Z'I 8I0Z/0E/TO EI.TKP +AS VIAIN3 SialD9EIE 8E87 Z6L7 00'0L07 00'0L07056 000960'00T 00'000'0051 00'000'0051 05L' OSL' 8I0Z/0E/TO EI.TKP +AS VIAIN3 SAVL09EIE 8E87 E6L7 00'006'8Z- 00'00L1L6'6 000LIC66 00'000'000'0I 00'000'000'0I 008' 008' 810Z/08/TO £1.1W +AS VIAIN3 8IVL09EIE 9E87 L8L7 00'009 00'009'000'0T 000900'00T 00'000'000'0I 00'000'000'0I 008' 008' 810Z/6Z/10 £1.1W +AS VIAIN3 95JL09EIE 8£87 56L7 00.960.E 00'960'E0Z'L 000E60'00T 00'000'00Z'L 00'000'00Z'L 00C OOL' 810Z/08/TO floW9>N+A5 VIAIN3 ZOVL09EIE 8887 E6L7 00'056- 00'055'666, 000166'66 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 058' 058' 810Z/08/TO fl.17,L>1\1,AS VIAIN3 ZE9L09EIE 8£87 T6L7 00'009'Z 00'009700'5 000Z50'00L 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 058' 058' 810Z/08/TO fl.TAi>N+AS VWN3 Of i09£T£ Zi6L7 IOL'Z 00.00VE 00'00Z'E00'0L 000Z£0'00T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00C OOL' LIOZ/9Z/ZI fl.TAi>N.V.5 VWN3 99VI09£L£ ZI7L7 ZOL'Z 00'008'Z- 00'00Z'L6L'8 000896'66 00'000'0SL'8 00'000'05L'8 00C OOC LIOZ/9Z/ZI fl.TAi>N.TAS VIAIN3 £3LI09£L£ LOLZ 0997 00.008.E 00'008'800'5 0009L0'00T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 008' 008' LIOZ/£T/ZI fl.TAi>N.TAS VIAIN3 9SEI99£I£ SOLI SOL'Z 00'058,- 00'059'566, 000E16'66 00.000'000'S 00'000'000'S 008' 008' LIOZ/LZ/ZI fl.TAi>N.V.S VWN3 £I9I99£I£ ZI7L7 8697 00'0061Z- 00'001'8L6'6 00018C66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSL' 05L' LIOZ/9Z/ZI EIWPNxAS VWN3 661'199£L£ LZLZ SL97 69'8Z6'51- 9E1L0'9£L'8 000818'66 00.0007SC8 00'00075C8 0S8 0S8' LIOZ/8I/ZI EPAL>NxAS VWN3 SIZI09ELE LOLZ 0997 00.008.E 00'008'E00'S 0009L0'OOL 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 008' 008' LIOZ/£I/ZI EPAL>NxAS VWN3 9SEI99£I£ LZLZ SL97 00'00Z'81- 00'008186'6 000818'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 0S8' 058' LIOZ/8I/ZI EPAl>NAS V1NN3 SIZI99£L£ 8097 L997 00'01£7 00'01.£7SZ'S OOObbO'OOT 00'000'05Z'S 00'000'05Z'5 008' 008' LIOZ/LO/II flo1A19>NAS V1NN3 5E180098N Z95' 95S' 05'L8L'£ 00'05£'500'S OOOLOL'ON 05795100'S 00'000'000'S 681' OOS' SIOZ/ZZ/OI aWPIN xN£ V1NN3 Z90005EL£ LI97 9957 00'009'S 00'009'500'0T 000950'00T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 008' 008' LIOZ/80/II EPAl>NAS V1NN3 66M099£L£ 6178' 0178 00'0081Z 00'008110'01. 000811'00T 00'000'066'6 00'000'000'0T £8£' Z8Z' 9I0Z//0/Z0 xAS VWN3 OX9d39£L£ SONO9 VIAIN3 _ Ye 00'00VE68'0EZ 89LSS6'66 99'LS9'9S8'0EZ 00'000'000'IEZ = SZ6' KV LI'SSE 00'000'9861Z 00011'6'66 £8.5t9'5867Z 00'000'000'5Z 0£L' OEI' SIOZ/Z0/60 3ZON JSIQ VWN3 £31885£L£ SZ6' 6ZV LITSE 00'000'986,Z 000166'66 58'519'5861Z 00'000'000'5Z 0£L' OEI' SIOZ/Z0/60 HZON JSIQ VIAIN3 £31885£L£ SZ6' 6Z6' b617b6 00'000'986,Z 000166'66 95'555'586,Z 00'000'000'5Z 0£L' OEI' SIOZ/Z0/60 HZON 0SI0 VIAIN3 I3196££L£ LW WV 66'905 00'057'586,Z 00011,6'66 90'E6L,86,Z 00'000'000'5Z OCT' OEI' SIOZ/OT/60 HZON 0SI0 VIAIN3 £N1885£T£ £91' Z9V 90'811'9 00'05L,86,Z 0006E6'66 661£9'8L6,Z 00'000'000'5Z OLT' Oa 510Z/91/60 HZON 0SI0 VIAIN3 Lf11885£T£ OW 651,' 05'L£T'T 00'000'6L618 000016'66 05798'LL61£ 00'000'000'55 OIT' NV SIOZ/ST/60 HZON 0SI0 VIAIN3 011885£T£ L9E' 99£' 98'6L5'9 00'051'686'0£ 000596'66 VVOL9786'0£ 00'000'000'T£ SIT' SLI' SIOZ/Zi/80 HZON 0SI0 VIAIN3 LHN885£T£ LC"' L£I' ZZ'ZZL'OI 00'005'866,Z 000,66'66 8L'LLL'L86,Z 00'000'000'5Z OOT' 00V SIOZ/OZ/50 HZON 0SI0 VIAIN3 ZA3885£T£ 8I1' Sit 00'5Z9'0I 00'05L'866,Z 000566'66 00.5Ze8861Z 00'000'000'5Z 560' S60. SIOZ/£1/50 3ZON 0SI0 VIAIN3 ON3885£T£ S9.LON JSIO VIAIN3 - E9'8SI'IZ9 I9LT 00'00S'6Z I661 00'0017 SSLT 00'0S7'5£ L9C 00,817'5I 817L17 00'0S9'L£ 6866 17051 E00'S 6861 E00'S 8E'E09tWEEIS 00'005'610'0T 00'001700'0I 00'057'550'5T 00,817'516'L 00'059'L£0'SI LZZSOVOOI 00056 COOL OOOIZO'OOI 00055-000T 000961'001 OOOISVOOI SLWWIZ8'88S 00'000'066'6 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5I 00'000'006'L 00'000'000'SL 00'000'EZ8'88S 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5T 00'000'006'L 00'000'000'5I 91,91 SZ91 OZOZ/EZ/£0 9o1nT9N+NS JWIH3 OZ9' OZ9' 910Z/0E/60 floW£>N+NSZ'Z JW1H3 0981 0581 OZOZ/0£/£0 9oW9N+N5 JWIH3 SZ91 SZ91 OZOZ/SZ/EO 9oW£>N.1NSJWIH3 006.E 006'I OZOZ/OE/EO 9oW£>N.17,S JWI113 IIN90b£L£ 6N1ISOb£L£ 6WN90b£I£ hAN90b£I£ KNWO£T£ ,£lpmew uopemO sso-l/ule0 oy smaA pa1.1poll paz leamn an1eA Iai+eW a�.reN anleA loog rz3 Awn/eiN uodno0 apci uopdn>saO dISf1J oZ MIA NL1+nleW s9ulPloH 01103V0d Pu3 +IL++ow 6 110,10HTIOa XVI-2I32If1SVINI HQISRIHARI 10 kthlflOD 66 bI8' L08' OZ'LIVZ- 08'889'L90'5I 0001786'66 00'000'OLO'SI 00'000'OLO'SI OEZ' OEZ' 9I0Z/ZZ/LO 1AI 9a33 LiZQ3£ELE b9L' LSC 00'05L'6- 00'057'0661Z 000L96'66 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ OZZ' OZZ' 9I0Z/b0/LO 1AI 9ald Oa333£EIE EE8' 9Z8' 00'009'9I- 00'00S'E861Z 00017E6'66 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ OEZ' OEZ' 910Z/6Z/LO 1ASZ1 flail £XZQ3£ELE £E8' 9Z8' 00'05I'9- 00'001'066171 000b£6'66 00'05Z'96611 00'000'000'SL OSZ' OEZ' 910Z/6Z/10 1ASZ1 gala £XZQ3£EIE £E8' 9Z8' 00'0011" 00'006'E66'6 0006£6'66 00'009'L66'6 00'000'000'0T OSZ' OEZ' 910Z/6Z/10 1ASZ1 gala £XZQ3£EI£ ZESb 0051 00'019'9 00'00Z100'0L 000Z170'001 00'099'L66'6 00'000'000'0T OSZ' SDZ' 6I0Z/01/OL JAG gala OOXQ3£EI£ b8L' 9LL' 00'0SL1L- 00'005'100'5Z 000900'001 00'0SZ'9L0'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 81Z' OLZ' 9L0Z/L1/10 1ASZ1 9ald 0171,1Q3£EI£ ZEST I055 00'005'0i 00'005'010'5Z 000Z170'001 00'000'000'5Z 00'000'000'5Z SVZ' SbZ' 6L0Z/01/OI JAG 9ald OOXQ3£EI£ ZESb I051 00'006'9 00'00E4900'5T 000Z170'001 00'000'000'51 00'000'000'51 SVZ' S6Z' 610Z/01/OI JAG 9ald OOXQ3£ELE b05' ZOS' 00'008'E- 00'009166'61 000EL6'66 00'0017'866'61 00'000'000'0Z 861' 061' 5I0Z/I0/0L JAI flaid EdMQ3£EI£ 86E' LbE' OOZOE- 00'096'666'E 000666'66 00Z9Z'0001 00'000'0001 UV 08I' SIOZ/50/80 1ASZ1 flail IMNCI3££I£ Z6£' I6E' 00'005'1 00'009100'9Z 000900'001 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 081' 08I' SIOZ/IZ/80 .,AI 9J33 89IQ3£EI£ Sti£' SbE' 00'05Z'9- 00'05L'E661Z 0005L6'66 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'5Z 06I' 061' SIOZ/b0/80 .,AI 9J33 9A2IQ3£EI£ fa Va' 00'008 00'005'666'6 000566'66 00'00L'866'6 00'000'000'0T £9I' OSI' SIOZ/60/LO .,AI 9J33 OLOQ3£EI£ IZI' Orr 00'0 00'000'05ra 000000'001 00'000'05ra 00'000'05ra 06I' 061' 5I0Z/171/90 1ASZ'I £D13 6Q3Q3£EI£ S80' 580' OIZ8I 00'055'66611 000L66'66 06'L9E'666171 00'000'000'SI KI. 0£I' SIOZ/I0/50 1AI flail EANCHEEI£ 8LI' 8LI' 00'0ZI'E- 00'059'100'ST 000II0'00i 00'OLL1700'SI 00'000'000'SI Z9I' 061' SIOZ/b0/90 'ASTI flail Z9JQ3£EI£ S6I' i6I' 00'05E'I 00'05Z700'SI 0005.10'00i 00'006'000'SI 00'000'000'SI SZZ' OEZ' SIOZ/OI/90 1AI 9J33 LS3Q3££I£ 8LI' 8LL' 00'059'I 00'059'100'ST OOOIIO'OOI 00'000'000'SI 00'000'000'SI 06I' 06I' SIOZ/b0/90 'ASZI 9J33 Z9JQ3£EI£ 8LI' 8LL' 00'0091 00'00Z'Z00'0Z OOOIIO'OOI 00'009'000'0Z 00'000'000'0Z 88I' 06I' SIOZ/b0/90 1ASZ1 flail Z9JQ3£EI£ S80' 580' 00'Ste05- 00'0081700'SI 000Z£0'00I 00'51'5'550'ST 00'000'000'SI 8LI' 005' SLOZ/I0/50 1ASZ1 gall EfNd3£EI£ 8LI' 8LI' 00'SLI'Z 00'059100'ST 000IL0'00i 00'SLb'66611 00'000'000'ST £6I' 061' S10Z/i0/90 1ASZ1 gall Z9JQ3£EI£ 9Z6' OZ6' 00'0081 00'008'Z00'01 0008Z0'00I 00.000100'01 00.000'000'01 OL£' SL£' 910Z/E0/E0 1A2 gall E9JQ3£EI£ Lib' 9117' 00'008'9 00'009'£00'01 0009E0'00I 00'008'966'6 00.000'000'01 Oa OSZ' S10Z/OI/60 1A1 gall 17>13Q3£EI£ 9691 EL91 00'00E'S 00'008'L661 000956'66 00'005'Z661 00'000'000'S IEL' 089' 910Z/60/Z1 d1AIDVIE gall L>N9Q3£EI£ WV ZOi' 00'009'9 00'009'900'S1 0001170'00i 00'000'000'S1 00'000'000'S1 08Z' 08Z' S10Z/SZ/80 1ASC19a33 91dQH£EIE £E01 ZZO'1 00'058'£ 00'001'8661 000Z96'66 00'05Z1661 00'000'000'S 69V 0£i' 910Z/1I/b0 a.1APVIE 9a33 9Z>Ia3£EI£ S1£' VIE' 5Z'881'6 00'055'500'S1 OOOLEO'OOI 5L190'96611 00'000'000'S1 Z6Z' bIZ' S10Z/iZ/L0 .1A57 9a33 Id9a3£EIE S80' 590' 00'0091 00'009100'S 000ZE0'001 00'000'L661 00'000'000'S OZS' 005' S10Z/10/50 .1AE gall EINd3EEIE 8501 ISO'I 00'00£'6I 00'00E1.10'0T 000£b1'OOI 00'000'566'6 00'000'000'0T Z6Z' 917Z' 9LOZ/OZ/b0 .1A5 9a33 SAH>I1£EIE SONOS 8a3d ZI'69e89 _ Ii'8£i'IEO'OSI 00E086'66 9ZS' 5Z5" LtIL51 00.006186'6L 00=6'66 La' 9LZ' 50.9LS'IL Lb'8EI'850'SL 000186'66 Z9I' 191' 90'819'I1 00'05Z'86617Z 000E66'66 91Z' 9IZ' L916L'Z1 00'05L'9661Z 000L86'66 L5Z' 91Z' L9'91611 00'05Z'9661Z 000586'66 Z9I' 191' 95'500'II 00'057'8661Z 000E66'66 WI' IOU 00'05£'S 00'00f/66611 000966'66 _ L90'Z 9L'LIL'9K 66V 86i" OO.SZI'£ OSLE6 ££'856'Z 00'0LZ'9- 00'OOZ'9Z 00'000- 00'005'L- 00'LE8'01- 00'08- 00'05L- 00'006'91 00'000'£Z 00'OOS1E 00'000'6- 00'000'6- 00'£1L'91- 007L8$- 00'59 00'00S'L- 00'99b'ZI 00.005'L1 00.0061Z 00'09£'L1 00'O5LW- 00'005'£- 00'00£- 00'O5Z'OI- 00'O5I'9- 00'005'6I- 00'009Wb 00'056'0i 00'008'I£ 00'50E1 00'0091 00'001'Z 00'09S'Z- 00'0SZ'SE 00.005'5Z 00'009'8I 00'006'SI 00'051 00'008'Z 00'00E1 00'000'6I- 00'069'ii 00'0S8'I- 00'OOE'1Z- 00'059'OI- 00'059'OI- 00'059'OI- 00'009'1I 00'009'IL 00'0561 00'008'6 00'OOZ'i- 00'0Z5'8 L58Z0'i- 00'001'E 00'0Ib'I LOS' 88V OiS' £00'S 0001 0001 LES' SiS' L96' L56'b 8881 S161 OL6' OL6' 8£81 9181 816' SZ8' £5L'b £SCI £ZL'b £5L'L L5L' OLL' OLL' £E8' £E8' £SL'b LSCZ £ZL'b bb9'b LLZ'i LLZ'i LLZ'i LiZ'i 671 61Z'i ibZ'Z E6i'Z 1'861 EZL'I EZL'I SZZ'£ SZZ'£ SZZ'£ ZZZ'£ ZZZ'£ ZZZ'£ ZZZ'£ EOZ'£ COTE 19I'£ ESI'£ 817t£ ZDI'E iES'I OLS'I bES'I ZOS' L86' S£S' SSL'b L66' L66' 9£S' 196' 19817 Z191 8991 106 106 Z£9'b 1'6Sb 116' LIB' EISb Z£C1 081,1 ZEL'I 81'L' Z9L' Z9L' 9Z8' 9Z8' Z551 169'Z O81'1 E80'i E80'i E9L'i tat ZSO'b ZSO'i LOZZ LbbZ 8561 6691 6691 S£1'E ZSL'E 8S1'E LSI'E LSI'E LSL'E LSL'E EWE EWE OIL'E 660'E i60'E 880'E ZI51 ISSL Mel E67S£'ZSZ'ZSL 00.05L'£861Z 00'05Z'1861Z 00'0001861Z 00'OLL'966'81 00'00Z'9Z0'OI 00.009'5661T 00'005Z661Z 00'05L'5861Z 00'096'0001 00'05Z'666$1 00'006'910'01 00'000'£ZO'OI 00'0051E0'S1 00.0001661Z 00.0001661Z 00'L88'808'6 00'8ZI'S5£'£ 00'590'009'9 00'005'Z661Z 00'991/ZI91 00'005'LI5'ZI 00'0061ZO'OI 00'09£'LIO'L 00'05Z'5661Z 00'005'9661Z 00'00L'6661I 00'05L'6861Z 00'058'£661i 00'005'086'6 00'0091170'0I 00'056'0'10'5 00'0081E0'5T 00'089'ISZ'S 00'009100'5 00'001700'0T 00'0bb'L66'L 00'0SZ'8E0'5I 00'005'5Z0'0I 00'001'9'0'0T 00'006'5'0'5 00'051'000'5 00'008700'0T 00'00E100'5 00'000'186'6 00'0691'0'g 00'051'966/ 00'00L'8L6'6 00'0SE'6861 00'0SE'6861 00'0SE'6861 00'009'IIO'OI 00'009'IIO'OI 00'056100'S 00'008'600'0T 00'008'566'6 001:Z5'800TC Eb'58918Z1 00'00I'E00'0I 00'0Ib'IOb'6 ZSUZ0'OOI 0005E6 66 OOOSZ6'66 0009E6'66 000E86'66 OOOZ9Z'OOI OOOOL6'66 OOOOL6'66 000E16'66 0001ZO'OOL 000566'66 000691'001 OOOOEZ'OOL OOOOEZ'OOI 000196'66 000196'66 0009E8'66 000558'66 OOOI00'00T OOOOL6'66 OOOILZ'OOI OOOOb1'00T 00061Z'OOI 00086Z'OOI 000186'66 000986'66 000866'66 000656'66 000656'66 000508'66 0009bb'OOI 0006IZ'OOI OOOZIZ'OOI OOOZEO'OOI OOOZEO'OOI OOOLZO'001 000896'66 OOOSSZ'OOI OOOSSZ'OOI 000191'001 0008I£'OOI 000E00'001 0008Z0'001 0008Z0'001 000018'66 000EIVOOT OOOEZ6'66 OOOL8C66 OOOL8C66 OOOL8C66 OOOL8C66 0009II'OOI 0009II'OOI 000660'001 000860'001 000856'66 0001L0'001 000906'66 0001E0'001 OOOSIO'OOI 6Z'699'Z96'681 00'000190'OSI ELL' 68.888'Z86'61 00.000'000'0Z Obl' Ott SLOZ/60/01 HION aSICl 9a3d iIWZI£EIE 9£'Z95'9170'5L 00'000'190'5L OLI' Oa' SLOZ/OI/LO HION aSIa 9a33 ZAH96£EI£ 1761E9'9861Z 00'000'000'SZ 011' OIL' SLOZ/6Z/50 ILON aSIQ 9Ddl bHOZI££I£ E£'856'£8617Z 00'000'000'SZ 011' OI1' SIOZ/8I/90 I,LON aSIQ 9ad3 1dHZ1£EIE E£'£E£'I8617Z 00'000'000'SZ OZI' OZ1' SIOZ/6Z/90 I,LON aSIQ 9aH3 SWHZ1£EK 1111/ 'L86'bZ 00'000'000'SZ Z80' Z80' SIOZ/6Z/50 I,LON aSIQ 9aHl b3OZI£ELE 00'0501661T 00.000'000'ST OLO' OLO' SIOZ/L0/50 I,LON aSIQ 9aHl OOdZI£ELE S3.LON aSIO EDIT LISEe900'ZSL 00.5Z9'0861Z OS'ZL£'0861Z L9117018617Z 00'0170'£00'6I 00.000'000'01 00'000'000'S1 00'000'000'SZ 00'L8S'9661Z 00'0101001 00'000'000'S1 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'S1 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'g 00'000'578'6 00'000'09CE 00'000'005'9 00'000'000'g 00'000'0091 00'000'005'U 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'L 00'000'000'5Z 00'000'000'5Z 00'000'000'5T 00'000'000'5Z 00'000'000'5T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5I 00'5L£'L6Z'S 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'8 00'000'000'5I 00'000'000'0T 00'005'L66'6 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'EI 00'000'866/ 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000V 0011L'58Z1 00'000'000'0T 00'000'0017'6 711WIL'OLO'ZSL 00'000'000'5Z 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 00.000'000'61 00.000'000'01 00'000'000'S1 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'0001, 00'000'000'5f 00'000'000'0L 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'S1 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'SZ8'6 00'000'09£'£ 00'000'005'9 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'0091 00'000'005'U 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'L 00.000'000'5Z 00'000'000'5Z 00'000'000'5T 00'000'000'5Z 00'000'000'5T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5I 00'000'05Z'S 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'8 00'000'000'5I 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'EI 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'5 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'01 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'n. 0011L'58Z1 00'000'000'0T 00'000'00b'6 LEL' b0£' £0£' b0£' £9L' 0581 OOb' OOb' £8L' 85.1' OOb' 05L'I 0081 0081 00£' 00£' OOS'L SZ9'L OS£' 00£' 0081 Oa' 0081 OSL' 00£' OL£' 00£' OSZ' OSZ' 005'1 OSO'1 008'1 SZ9'1 09L'1 OSCL 000'1 005'1 005'1 0051 8901 0901 006' OSL' OSL' OSZ'1 0001 806' SL8' SL8' SL8' SL8' 008' 008' 05L' OSL' OSL' 05L' 00f 055' SZ9' .0199111d 6HWb8£EI£ OSL' SLOZ/Z0/0L o1\199"1114 011A1b8EEIE OSL' SLOZ/5Z/60 0IM9811-13 8QWb8£EIE 061' SIOZ/ii/OI oWL 91113 9aa£dOEIE 0581 OZOZ/oE/E0 9oWE>NaA591Hd LHIbdOEIE OOb' 9IOZ/0£/£0 9oWPNI1AL 91111 00V 9IOZ/0£/£0 9oWE>N1AL 911-13 091' SIOZ/EI/OI oWL 91143 00Z' SIOZ/9I/OI 1AL 811-13 00V 9IOZ/8I/£0 HoW9>NyAt 91H3 OSCI OZOZ/II/£0 9oWE>VAS 91113 0081 OZOZ/LI/ZO VINP SAS 91113 0081 OZOZ/LZ/ZO 9oW£>VAS 91113 00E' 9I0Z/9Z/Z0 9ollE>NxA191H3 00E' 910Z/9Z/ZO 01AIE>Nx1C191113 0051 OZOZ/OE/IO 9oW9>NxA591H3 5Z91 OZOZ/ZZ/IO 9oW9>NxA591H3 OSE' 910Z/6Z/ZO x1C191H3 00E' 910Z/9Z/I0 xAI 91113 008'1 6I0Z/OE/ZI fl01A19N1A591H3 OLC 9LOZ/0£/ZI 3oW9>NxAZ 91113 0081 610Z/61/Z1 fl01/P9>N1X591113 05L' 9I0Z/OE/ZI 31APVAZ 91113 OOE' 510Z/OE/ZI 3oW9>VAL 911-13 OIE' 9IOZ/90/I0 9oWL>N.A191H3 00E' 910Z/90/10 3oW9>VA191H3 05Z' 9I0Z/6Z/I0 +AI 91113 05Z' 9I0Z/6Z/I0 1AI 91113 0051 6I0Z/OE/ZI VIAIW +A591H3 0501 LIOZ/6Z/ZI 1A£911-13 0081 6I0Z/6I/ZI 9 IWVAS 911-13 SZ91 6I0Z/0Z/1i 9IWVAS 911-13 05L'I 6I0Z/60/LO 90W£>N.AS 911-13 05L1 6I0Z/60/LO 9oWE> Y/LS 91H3 0001 610Z/60/LO VINE>N+AS £11113 0051 610Z/9Z/90 VIAI9 +AS 9114.3 0051 610Z/81/90 90W£>N+AS 9114.3 0051 610Z/81/90 90W£>N+AS 91141 0501 LIOZ/LZ/90 9oWE>N1A5Z.£911-13 0501 LIOZ/9Z/60 VIAIWN+AS'E 9114.3 006' LIOZ/bZ/£0 VIAIW sAE 9114.3 05C 9I0Z/61/ZI 90WPVAS'E 9114.3 05C 9I0Z/61/ZI 90WPVAS'E 9114.3 OSZ'I 8I0Z/OZ/90 901/£>N1A591113 0001 8I0Z/OZ/90 VIAT9N1A591113 006' 8I0Z/OZ/90 90W9>N1A5 fl1143 SL8' 810Z/61/90 801/s19N1A5 fl1143 SL8' 810Z/61/90 VIAIP iA5 fl1143 SL8' 810Z/61/90 VIAIPN1A5 fl1143 SL8' 810Z/61/90 90W£>NiA591H3 008' 8I0Z/ZI/90 9PAPVA591H3 008' 8I0Z/ZI/90 9PAPVA591H3 OSL' 8I0Z/6Z/SO an\IWN1A591H3 OSL' 8I0Z/SZ/50 VIAIW SAS 91H3 05C 8I0Z/EZ/50 EP:NO SAS 91H3 05L' 810Z/IZ/50 9oW9>N1AS 91H3 00C 910Z/II/OI doW9Vist 911-13 05S' 9I0Z/bZ/OI VIA19N1A5'£ 911-13 5Z9' 910Z/11/01 9oW£>N.17,S'£ 911-13 IZL' OSLSLOZ/6Z/60 5AfbdoElE 5AfbdoElE L9>IWOEIE 5flb£VOEIE 6HCIWOElE 6XEIWOElE 5Hdbd0ElE S2ldbd0ELE 6AZ£dOEIE 6AZ£dOEIE bZA£dOEIE S9fI£dOEIE ZbM£dOEIE 03M£dOEIE IZS£dOEIE 8W2I£dOELE 9a1£dOELE IfIO£dOELE 95O£d0£L£ ZdO£d0£L£ OHO£d0£L£ L8d£d0£L£ 18d£d0£LE 8IW£d0£L£ E8N£d0£L£ 9a1£d0£L£ 6SH£d0£I£ 9ZQZd0E1E 9ZQZd0E1£ LXQZdOEIE 6HVZd0EIE LZEZdOEIE LZEZdOEIE LILLdOELE LOVIVO£IE EISLdOEIE Z9JE8££IE Z9JE8££IE Zd3£8£EIE LN3£8£EIE 6W3£8£EIE bda£8£EIE bdaEB£EIE bda£8£EIE bda£8£EIE 9N9£8£EIE 9N9£8£E16 OWb£8£EIE 8IE£8£EIE IWE£8£EIE IEAZ8£EIE LSS08E£IE 81SZ8E£IE LH1Z8£EI£ ,Elpmew uopemO sso-l/uleO oy sma A pa1.1poll paz leamn anleA i..1d anleA 4.31=1I 4J ,1%% loog reH Awn/eNI uodnoa aleO uopdn>saO dlSlla 0y MIA LIl+nleW %8uIP10H 0I1091'0d Pug wow OI 210,10HTIOJ XVI-21321fISVINI HQISRIHARI 10 kthlf10J 00T IMP SZZ'T 99'89£'Z081 Ob'ObS'ZOb'O£L'S LZ8S10'001 6L'bLI'009'8ZL'8 00'b1L'86b'6ZL'S 69b' leloy puexO SZZ1 99'89£'Z081 Ob'068'Z0V0£L'S LZ8S10'00I 6L'bLI'009'8ZL'8 00'bTL'86b'6ZL'S pun3leloy SST' LSI' 981Z£'ZII Eb'bLS'SI£1179 ISZIL6-66 LSZSZ'£OZ'I179 00000'009119 0LC 60E' 61,11,VZ- L9999'£861Z L996E6'66 IFIII'98617Z 00000'000'SZ 091' 09T' SIOZ/ZZ/LO aHOD 1V1IdVa 39 IN flf6S69E 88Z' L8Z' E£'8S6'S- L9999'696'617 E££6E6'66 00'SZ9'SL6'66 00000'000'OG OSI' OST' SIOZ/6I/L0 <MOD 2I0ZOIN VIOA01 Z3I1HE£Z68 £ZI' EZI' 071717917 L9'999'Z66'6E L99I86'66 ZZ'ZZO'886'6E 00'000'000'017 OTT 06T' SIOZ/SI/SO &TOJ 1VZIdVJ 30 USf6S69E Sit SIT' SL'8ZI'I O TH/966'0Z LI6Z86'66 SL'£8Z'S66'0Z 00000'000/Z SOT' SOT' SIOZ/ZI/SO OD V10J VJOJ 6JS9IZI6I OEZ' 0£L' 99'I6Z E£'8S8'986'6Z 661956'66 L9'999'986'6Z 00000'000'0E GEV OCT' STOZ/EZ/90 311S3N LdIHSOI69 9TZ' 9IZ' E£'8LS'£ E£'8LI'Z66'8I E£8856'66 00'009'886'8T 00'000'000'6T 081' 08T' STOZ/8I/90 <MOD 2I0ZOYN VZOA01 ELLHE£Z68 6IZ' EIZ' L9'I6I- E£'808'L86'6Z 19E656'66 00000'886'6Z 00000'000'0E OZ.(' OZT' STOZ/LI/90 31IS3N SHZHSOT69 KZ' £IZ' ££'808'6 ££'808'L86'6Z 19£6S6'66 00000'£86'6Z 00000'000'0£ Oa' OLI' SIOZ/LI/90 d110J1VIMVJ 30 9H1I6S69£ 80Z' 80Z' 00'SZ£ 00'9Z1'886'6Z L11096'66 00008'L86'6Z 00'000'000'0E OZ.(' OZT' STOZ/SI/90 31IS3N 631HS0169 L6I' L6T' ££'85L E£'SSL'886'6Z 8ZSZ96'66 00000'886'6Z 00000'000'0C OZ.(' OZT' STOZ/TI/90 31IS3N Rai-10169 £EZ' Z£Z' LI168'6 E£'896'06VIZ L99956'66 9I'LLS'S8VIZ 00'000'00M SLI' SGT' STOZ/6Z/90 OD V10J-VJOJ Zay9IZI6I 8LI' 8LI' 68'88- 61,16Z'£66'6I ZZZ996'66 ££'£££'£66'6I 00000'000'0Z OOI' OOT' STOZ/60/90 31IS3N 6b1HS0169 £LI' ZLI' ££'£86'Z E£'£81'066'6Z 8LZL96'66 00'00L'L86'6Z 00'000'000'0E OZ.(' Orr STOZ/Z0/90 31IS3N 9ZIHSOI69 90' 90: 0979L'LT 00'009'686'6b L999L6'66 09'LECTL6'617 00'000'000'0 06I' 06T' STOZ/LZ/SO <MOD 2I0ZOVd VZOAOI ZZSHE£Z68 MY Ib0' L9'999'6 L9'999'L66'6E L911766'66 00'000'886'6E 00'000'000'017 OZ.(' at SIOZ/SI/60 319IAIVO* 2I31002Id 63IflIat'L I60' Ib0' ££'£80'ZI ££'£80'L66'66 L91666'66 00'000'986'07 00.000'000'0S OZ.(' at STOZ/SI/60 319NIV9 J82I31DOHd 632IflI.LZ6L £ZI' at 6£'£££'0 L9'999'Z66'6£ L99186'66 E£'£E£'LL6'6E 00'000'000'01, OLT' OLT' STOZ/SI/SO <NOJ 1VZIdVJ 3O USf6S69E ZEI' I£T' 00'00S'9 ££'£80'966'61 L11086'66 E£'£8S'686'61 00'000'000'0Z OSI' OST' STOZ/8I/S0 OD V10J-VJOJ 6I59IZI6I KV LIT' ££'££8'6 00'00S'966'61 009Z86'66 L9'999'986'61 00'000'000'0Z 00Z' OOZ' SIOZ/EI/SO d2I0J2I0ZON V107,0I LQSHE£Z68 910' 910' LV6ZL'6T LI'6L6'6661Z LI6L66'66 00'09L'186'1Z 00'000'000'g 08I' 091' SIOZ/90/60 d2I0J2I0Z0W V.TOAOy £92IHE£Z68 9E0' 9£0' OS'L81'ZI 000SL'8661Z 000S66'66 OS'Z9S'98617Z 00'000'000'57 OSI' OSI' STOZ/EI/60 OD V10J-VJOJ EGIMIZT6T 213dVd LNINOJ 111111- ESS' 0010 OV69L'Sb8'6b TZ66L6'66 OZ'69L'S68'66 00VOOtS8'6b LTC 06S' L£S' 000 00'000'069 00000000I 00'000'069 00'000'069 09£' OSE' SIOZ/171/01 HUISHHAIH 30 A1Nf10J LOVV61694 L££' 9£E' 00'0 SZ'SI6'LZ£'8 000SI6'66 SZ'SI6'LZ£'8 00'000'S£03 KZ' OST' SIOZ/10/90 31V.IS NOLONIHSVM 9dHO6L6£6 60S' ZOS' 00'0 00000'S96'ZI 000000'00T 00'000'S96'ZI 00'000'S96'ZI OTZ' Ur SIOZ/IO/OI 3IVZS SVX3.I 9Hd£ZLZ88 OLI' OLT' 00'0 96'£98'Z6Z'IT 000186'66 96'£98'Z6Z'LT 00'000'S6Z'LI OZZ' OOZ' SIOZ/I0/90 HIVZS 3NIVIN ZHXVZS099 9Z11. SIT'T 00'0 00'000'OLO'ZT 000000'00T 00'000'OLO'ZI 00000'OLO'ZI OW OW 9I0Z/SI/S0 3IVZS VNVISII101 U101,9179 SOIN09 INOYN 660' 60I' SIT' 960' 610' 9L0' 860' 60I' SIT' 960' 610' E9'889'EY L9 998'£ 00'S'W£ Z6IL6'9 91'691'£T 88'OLS'9I SO'8bZ'9I6'OZL Z6'S88'466'6I E£'856'866'6 89'L8Z'9L6'ZZ E856517661E 6L'OL0'61717'8E 8Z9886'66 E06S86.66 £85686'66 986£86'66 L16686'66 E8SL66'66 Z6'6SS'ZLVOZI SL'8I0166'6I E££££'S66'6 9L'SI£'696'ZZ L916E18616 T6'666'ZE6'8E NI' 00'000'000'ST 514' 56I" SIOZ/90/S0 S1N39321 DO £9SfratI6 00'000'000'0T OSI' OSI' SIOZ/80/S0 S1N393H Jfl 68SI1Ti616 00'000'086'ZZ 514' SVC' STOZ/ZL/SO S1NH932I Jfl OJSITUtt6 00000'000'SE S9I' S9T' STOZ/SO/SO SZN3932IJfl SSSITH1716 00000'00'8E S6I' S6T' STOZ/LO/60 SZN3032IJfl ZLTIIITIVI6 SNdJ 0113Z INf1YN LZO'£ 968'Z 00'LI£'69Z 00'LI£'901'6SZ IZ0660'OOI 00'000'LES'8 i L06. 868' 00.009'IL- 0000V886'6I 000Z6666 00'000'000'0Z 00'000'000'0Z OS£OSE' 9I0Z/SZ/Z0 JAI VJPIV1 06IdSl£IE IS VI ZVL I 000ST 000SL'000'ST 00010000T 00000'000'ST 00'000'000'ST 006' OW 9I0Z/6Z/SO JAI VJINV1 £E1d0ElE Z59'6 0E91 00'096'9I- 00'090'£86'6T 000L88'66 00.000'000'ST 00.000'000'ST 009'I 009'T OZOZ/60/Z0 VIAl£aNJAS VJWV1 693d51E1E ZS8'6 61917 00'00S'OT 00'00S'OTO'OT OOOSOVOOT 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OS6'I 056'T OZOZ/60/Z0 0001£aNJAS VJNIV1 ILaISIEIE ZS8'b 9£917 00'0081- 00'00Z'866'6 000Z86'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSS'I OSS'T OZOZ/60/Z0 00YNPNJAS VJNIV1 L1L3SIEIE 9E8'6 9I91 00'008'Z- 00'00Z'L66'6 000ZL6'66 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T 009'I 009'I OZOZ/6Z/I0 901A1PNJAS VJWV3 £3LdSIEI£ £LL'6 6£S17 00'099'LE 00'099'LEO'ST OOOISZ'OOI 00.000'000'ST 00.000'000'ST OSL'I NCI OZOZ/90/I0 9.1A1P JAS VJWV3 ZMOSIEl£ bEL'6 8661 00'009'0 00'009'00'ST 0006Z£'00I 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'ST OSL'I NCI 6I0Z/EZ/ZI 9°YN90NJAS VJWVI 81,AdSIEIE 669'1' 8L617 00'0S8'6Z 00'098'6Z0'ST 000661'001 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'ST SZ9'I SZ91. 6I0Z/OI/ZI 9°IAIPNJAS VJYNVl Z6SdSIEIE LL9'b 06b17 00.000'0Z 00'000'0ZO'OT OOOOOZ'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T OSL'I OSCI 6I0Z/ZO/ZI 901A19aNJAS VJYNV3 090dSlEi£ LL9'b Ob617 00.000'0£ 00'000'0E0'ST OOOOOZ'OOI 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'0 OSL'I NCI 6I0Z/ZO/ZI EMATPN=AS VJWV3 090d01£1£ 009'1' 006 00'006'EZ 00'006'£ZO'ST 00090'00T 00'000'000'ST 00'000'000'0 0S8'I OS81 6IOZ/60/IT fl0IAIPWAS VJYNV3 £X9d0ElE ISS'b 00£6 °HOG'S 00'00L'S00'OT OOOLSO'OOI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'0T SL8'I Sal 6I0Z/LI/OT 9°YN901\JAS VJYNVI 92I9d9TETE 9E6Z L8E7 00'L99'S9 00'L99'SI6'8 000Z6COOI 00'000'0S8'8 00'000'0S8'8 OZT'T OZVI LIOZ/SO/60 JA£VJWVl 6>IZdST£T£ ZZ8' 6T8' 00'00S'SI 00'00S'£IO'SZ 00017 O'00T 00'000'8661Z 00'000'000'57 OLE' S9£' 9TOZ/SZ/I0 JAS'I VJWVl SLIdST£T£ L6Z' 917Z' 00'00S 00'005'000'57 000Z00'00I 00'000'000'57 00'000'000'57 OLT' OLT' STOZ/6Z/90 JASVI VJYNVl 66f1dST£T£ TIO'E 9S67 00'0 00'000'000'0I 000000'00T 00'000'000'0I 00'000'000'0T SL8' SL8' 8IOZ/£0/60 fl01AIPNJAS VJYNV3 8111dST£T£ 0£ff ZZ8' 00'0SZ'I- 00'0SL'866'6 000SL6'66 00'000'000'S 00'000'000'S SZ6' SZ6' 9IOZ/8Z/I0 JA£ VJYNVd 67,AdST£T£ SSZ' 6SZ' 00'00Z'9I 00'00Z'S00'0I OOOZSO'OOI 00'000'686'6 00'000'000'0T L89' OSS' SIOZ/ZO/LO JA£ VJYNVI 8>INIST£T£ JVIN 2Iamtv3 EH' ITN' £811LL'E9 888' 688. 68'8£1'LZ 0£9' 8Z9' 00'SL8'ZI Zit' ZIT' 176'9SL'EZ TL6' 66Z l 6Z6' 016' 016' 0077 588' I8L'Z IOI'I IZI'I IZI'I 17178: £98' IOI1 118' 1796' Z£Z' 1 £Z6 106' 106' S0Z 9L8' 8ZCZ £601 £IL'L ZIL'L 6£8' 6S8' £601 608' Z6'S£0 000001,1 00'0SL'9- 00'009'T- 00'005'6- 00'OOL'6£ 00'00E 00'0081r 00:000'Z S9'OZS'Z 00'00£'I- SC£L6'Z- 00'000'6- 00'000'Z 00'OSZ'6Z- 00'OSZ'LI6$L L99688'66 LI'6LYES8'6L 001100'000'EL SIT Sir 00'05V9661,Z 00058L'66 WITC6T61Z 00'000'000'SZ IZ£' OZ£' 910Z/8t/Z0 310N JSIO VJYNV3 LIDISI£I£ 00'0SZ'ZL6'6Z 000688'66 00'SL£'6S6'6Z 00'000'000'SZ 561' S61. SIOZ/9I/IT HION aSIO VJWVd LHd>ISI£L£ 00'0SL'866'6Z 000S66'66 90'£66'6L61Z 00'000'000'SZ 0£L' 0£I' SIOZ/II/SO 310N JSIO VJINVI 613>IST£T£ S3,LOIN JSIO JVIN3 00'000110'5Z 00'05Z'66617I 00'000'L66'6 00'005'5'60T 00'00L'6£0'0I 00'008'TOO'SI 00'00'£86'b 00'000'Z00'SZ 69'8Z£'90£'ZL 00'00L'866'6 0S7S8'0,Z'S 00'000'166'6 00'000'Z00'SZ 00'0SCSL61Z Z69I00'OOI 0009S000I OOOSS6'66 OOOOL6'66 OOOOL6'66 OOOL6E'OOT OOOZIO'OOT 000699'66 000800'00i OOOb80'OOI OOOL86'66 OOOIZ6'66 000016'66 000800'001 000E0666 00000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SI 00'009'866'6 00'000'000'SI 00000'000'0T 00'00S100'SI 00'0SV886'b 00'000'001AZ 96'LOS'£0£'ZL 00'000'000'0f SZ99L'86Z'S 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SZ 00000'000'SZ 00'000'000'SI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'SI 00'000'000'0T 00'000'000'SI 00:000'000'S 00'000'001AZ 00'000'96n-1 00'000'000'0f 00'000'0SVS 00'000'000'0f 00'000'000'SZ 00'000'000'9Z 005' O8Z' 66Z' O8Z' 000'T OLE' LS6' OS£' OS£' SL£' 6LZ' OSZ' OS£' OK' T8Z' 00S 08Z O8Z' O8Z' 0001 OZ£' SL8' OS£' 006' SL£' OSZ' OSZ' OS£' 06Z' 910Z/LZ/90 =ASri fl0a3 910Z/60/£0 +Al flail 9I0Z/9Z/ZO +AI flJ31 9I0Z/9Z/Z0 JAI flJ33 LIOZ/SZ/60 JAS'Z flJ33 9I0Z/LI/Z0 Jyk.1 8LOZ/60/I0 JA£ 9J3d JASZ'L Enid JAL 9J33 JIJAONJA£flJ33 JAL 9J33 JAL £01.4 =iSZ'L 9J33 JAI£1DE 910Z/90/SO 9L0Z/£I/SO 9LOZ/£I/SO 9LOZ/Z0/ZO 910Z/60/ZO 910Z/90/SO 9I0Z/IZ/TO £9A33E£I£ OfS33E£T£ 892I33E£T£ 892I33E£T£ TX033E£T£ ISd33E£T£ 93N33££I£ 9SNI33££I£ 6HSO3££I£ 66dJ3££I£ Z0YN33££I£ Z>IN33££I£ 9SYN33££I£ £11>T33E£T£ ,£lpmew uopexn0 sso-l/ule0 oy sxea A pal; poyN paz leaxuO anleA Iai+eYN iII "FA "FA 6lpn4eYN uodnop apci uopdpasaO dISf1J LIMA >loog =ed °.I PPP. LI1+uleYN .su1Pl0H 01103V0d Pu3 wow Full Compliance The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in FULL COMPLIANCE with the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy. The County's Investment Policy is more restrictive than the Califor- nia Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. MUNICIPAL BONDS (MUNI) U.S. TREASURIES LOCAL AGENCY OBLIGATIONS (LAO) FEDERAL AGENCIES COMMERCIAL PAPER (CP) CERTIFICATE & TIME DEPOSITS (NCD & TCD) REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (REPO) REVERSE REPOS MEDIUM TERM NOTES (MTNO) CALTRUST SHORT TERM FUND MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS (MMF) LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CASH/DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 5 YEARS NO LIMIT AAA 270 DAYS 40% A1/P1 5 YEARS 30% NA 1 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 92 DAYS 20% NA 5 YEARS 30% A NA NA NA 60 DAYS (I) 20% AAA/Aaa (2) NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 YEARS 15% AA-/Aa3/AA- 5 YEARS 100% NA 3 YEARS 2.5% INVESTMENT GRADE 5 YEARS 100% NA 270 DAYS 40% A1/Pl/F1 1 YEAR 25% Combined A1/P1/F1 45 DAYS 40% max, 25% in term repo over 7 days A1/P1/F1 60 DAYS 10% NA AA/Aa2/AA 3 YEARS 20% DAILY LIQUIDITY 1.0% NA DAILY LIQUIDITY 20% AAA by 2 Of 3 RATINGS AGC. DAILY LIQUIDITY Max $50 million NA NA NA NA I Mutual Funds maturity may be interpreted as weighted average maturity not exceeding 60 days. 2 Or must have an investment advisor with not less than 5 years experience and with assets under management of $500,000,000. THIS COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53646 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOgn 13 AGENDA ITEM 8G RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreements for On -Call Right of Way Appraisal Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award the following agreements to provide on -call right of way appraisal services for a four-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $950,000; a) Agreement No. 15-31-056-00 with Bender Rosenthal, Inc; b) Agreement No. 15-31-097-00 with Hennessy & Hennessy, LLC; c) Agreement No. 15-31-098-00 with Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles; d) Agreement No. 15-31-099-00 with Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants; and e) Agreement No. 15-31-100-00 with Riggs & Riggs, Inc.; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to contractors under the terms of the agreements. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Federal and state regulations require that before the initiation of negotiations with property owners, the public agency shall establish an amount that it believes is just compensation for the real property. The amount shall not be less than the approved appraisal of the fair market value of the property, taking into account the value of allowable damages or benefits to any remaining property. In order to comply with regulations, staff recommends that the Commission establish a list of on -call appraisers. All appraisers shall be licensed by the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers and follow the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP), published by the Appraisal Foundation. Federal and State governments recognize the USPAP as generally accepted appraisal standards. Agenda Item 8G 102 Procurement Process Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal with price and other factors considered. Non -price factors include elements such as qualifications of firm and the ability to respond to the Commission's needs for on -call right of way appraisal services as set forth under the terms of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 15-31-056-00. RFP No. 15-31-056-00 for on -call right of way appraisal services was released by staff on March 3, 2015. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the RFP was posted on the Commission's PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the Commission's website. Utilizing PlanetBids, emails were sent to 14 firms, none of which are located in Riverside County. Through the PlanetBids site, 22 firms downloaded the RFP; 3 of these firms are located in Riverside County. Staff responded to all questions submitted by potential proposers prior to the March 19 clarification deadline date. Eleven firms —Bender Rosenthal, Inc. (Sacramento); Epic Land Solutions, Inc. (Riverside); Hennessey & Hennessey, LLC (Tustin); Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles (Encino); Lidgard and Associates, Inc. (Orange); Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants (Montrose); Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. (Long Beach); R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc. (Long Beach); Riggs & Riggs, Inc. (Simi Valley); Valentine Appraisal & Associates (Santa Clarita); and Wood & Associates (Los Angeles) — submitted responsive and responsible statements of proposals prior to the 2:00 p.m. submittal deadline on April 9. Utilizing the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP, all firms were evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of Commission staff. Accordingly, the evaluation committee recommends contract award to Bender Rosenthal, Inc.; Hennessey & Hennessey, LLC; Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles; Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants; and Riggs & Riggs, Inc., as these firms earned the highest total evaluation scores. The multiple award, on -call, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity task order type contracts do not guarantee work to any of the awardees; therefore, no funds are guaranteed to any consultant. Pre -qualified consultants will be selected for specific tasks based on information contained in their proposal and/or competitive fee proposals for the specific tasks. Services will be provided through the Commission's issuance of contract task orders to the consultants on an as -needed basis. The Commission's standard form professional services agreement will be entered into with the consultants subject to any changes approved by the Executive Director, and pursuant to legal counsel review. Staff oversight of the contract will work to maximize the effectiveness of the consultants and minimize costs to the Commission. Agenda Item 8G 103 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2014/16 Amount: $ 150,000 N/A FY 2015/17+ $ 800,000 Source of Funds: Measure A, State Transportation Budget Adjustment: No Improvement Program, Federal N/A 003005 81403 00013 0000 222 3181401 003009 81403 00013 0000 222 3181401 003021 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 GL/Project Accounting No.: 003023 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 003027 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 003029 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 002302 81403 00013 0000 210 73 81401 005127 81403 00013 0000 210 72 81401 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \1`/44&A,54u Date: 05/20/15 Attachment: Standard Form On -Call Professional Services Agreement Agenda Item 8G 104 AGREEMENT NO. 15-31-056-00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FHWA AND/OR FTA FUNDING/ASSISTANCE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT WITH [CONSULTANT] FOR ON -CALL ON -CALL RIGHT OF WAY APPRAISAL SERVICES 1.0 PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") and [NAME OF FIRM] ("Consultant"), a [LEGAL STATUS OF CONSULTANT, e.g., Delaware corporation]. 2.0 RECITALS. 2.1 On November 8, 1988 the voters of Riverside County approved Measure A authorizing the collection of a one-half percent (1/2 %) retail transactions and use tax (the "Tax") to fund transportation programs and improvements within the County of Riverside, and adopting the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Plan (the "Plan"). 2.2 Pursuant to Public Utility Code Sections 240000 et seq., the Commission is authorized to allocate the proceeds of the Tax in furtherance of the Plan. 2.3 On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved an extension of the Measure A tax for an additional thirty (30) years for the continued funding of transportation and improvements within the County of Riverside. 2.4 A source of funding for payment for professional services provided under this Agreement may be federal funds from the United States Department of Transportation. This Commission may withhold payment of any federal funds hereunder until the certification shown in Exhibit "F" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is executed. 2.5 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and in the task order(s) to be issued pursuant to this Agreement and executed by the Commission and the Consultant ("Task Order"). Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing on -call [INSERT 17336.00023\9602162.1 105 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES] services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California (if necessary), and is familiar with the plans of the Commission. 2.6 The Commission desires to engage Consultant to render such services on an on -call basis. Services shall be ordered by Task Order(s) to be issued pursuant to this Agreement for future projects as set forth herein (each such project shall be designated a "Project" under this Agreement). 3.0 TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant shall furnish all technical and professional services, including labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional on -call [INSERT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE] necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more generally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Services shall be more particularly described in the individual Task Orders issued by the Commission's Executive Director or designee. No Services shall be performed unless authorized by a fully executed Task Order. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the relevant Task Order, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Commencement of Services. The Consultant shall commence work within five (5) days of receiving a fully executed Task Order from Commission. 3.2.1 In the event federal funding will be used for any Task Order, and to the extent Caltrans procedures apply in connection therewith, issuance of a "Notice to Proceed" on the Task Order or written authorization by the Commission's designated project manager may be contingent upon completion and approval of a pre -award audit. Any questions raised during the pre -award audit for the Task Order shall be resolved before the Commission will consider approval of the Task Order. Any federal aid provided under a Task Order is contingent on meeting all federal requirements and could be withdrawn, thereby entitling the Commission to terminate the Task Order, if the procedures are not completed. Consultant's files shall be maintained in a manner to facilitate Federal and State process reviews. In addition, the applicable federal agency, or Caltrans acting on behalf of a federal agency, may require that prior to performance of any work for which federal reimbursement is requested and provided, that said federal agency or Caltrans must give to Commission an "Authorization to Proceed". If any post -Task Order award audit recommendations are received by the Commission from Caltrans, Consultant shall make all necessary adjustments to conform to the audit recommendations. Refusal by Consultant to incorporate the interim audit or post -Task Order award recommendations of Caltrans will be considered a breach of the Task Order and this Agreement and cause for termination or suspension of the Services. 3.3 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first set forth above or the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed by the Commission, whichever 2 17336.00023\9602162.1 106 occurs first, to the later of July 1, 2019, or the date on which all Services under a Task Order issued prior to the foregoing date have been completed, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. No Task Orders will be issued after [INSERT AGREEMENT EXPIRATION DATE]. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines set forth in the Task Orders. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect following the termination of this Agreement. 3.4 Commission's Representative. The Commission hereby designates the [INSERT NAME OR TITLE], or his or her designee, to act as its Representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of the Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Commission's Representative shall also review and give approval, as needed, to the details of Consultant's work as it progresses. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 3.5 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates [INSERT NAME OR TITLE], or his or her designee, to act as its Representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to act on behalf of Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his professional skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement and as described in the relevant Task Order. Consultant shall work closely and cooperate fully with Commission's Representative and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction over, or an interest in, the Services. Consultant's Representative shall be available to the Commission staff at all reasonable times. Any substitution in Consultant's Representative shall be approved in writing by Commission's Representative. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval by the Commission. In the event that the Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of the key personnel, the Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.14. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are: [INSERT NAME(S)] 3.7 Preliminary Review of Work. All reports, working papers, and similar work products prepared for submission in the course of providing Services under this Agreement shall be submitted to the Commission's Representative in draft form, and the Commission may require revisions of such drafts prior to formal submission and approval. In the event plans and designs are to be developed as part of the Project, final 3 17336.00023\9602162.1 107 detailed plans and designs shall be contingent upon obtaining environmental clearance as may be required in connection with Federal funding. In the event that Commission's Representative, in his sole discretion, determines the formally submitted work product to be not in accordance with the standard of care established under this contract, Commission's Representative may require Consultant to revise and resubmit the work at no cost to the Commission. 3.8 Appearance at Hearings. If and when required by the Commission, Consultant shall render assistance at public hearings or other meetings related to the Project or necessary to the performance of the Services. However, Consultant shall not be required to, and will not, render any decision, interpretation or recommendation regarding questions of a legal nature or which may be construed as constituting a legal opinion. 3.9 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform all Services, duties and obligations required by this Agreement to fully and adequately complete the Project. Consultant shall perform the Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California during the term of this Agreement. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Consultant further represents and warrants to the Commission that its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the Commission, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. Any employee of Consultant or its sub -consultants who is determined by the Commission to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the Commission, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project. 3.10 Opportunity to Cure. Commission may provide Consultant an opportunity to cure, at Consultant's expense, all errors and omissions which may be disclosed during Project implementation. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a timely manner, such correction may be made by the Commission, and the cost thereof charged to Consultant. 3.11 Inspection of Work. Consultant shall allow the Commission's Representative to inspect or review Consultant's work in progress at any reasonable time. 4 17336.00023\9602162.1 108 3.12 Final Acceptance. Upon determination by the Commission that Consultant has satisfactorily completed the Services required under this Agreement and within the term set forth in Section 3.3, the Commission shall give Consultant a written Notice of Final Acceptance. Upon receipt of such notice, Consultant shall incur no further costs hereunder, unless otherwise specified in the Notice of Final Acceptance. Consultant may request issuance of a Notice of Final Acceptance when, in its opinion, it has satisfactorily completed all Services required under the terms of this Agreement. In the event copyrights are permitted under this Agreement, then in connection with Federal funding, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the United States Department of Transportation shall have the royalty -free non-exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, the work for governmental purposes. 3.13 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. For example, and not by way of limitation, Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all implementing regulations, design standards, specifications, previous commitments that must be incorporated in the design of the Project, and administrative controls including those of the United States Department of Transportation. Compliance with Federal procedures may include completion of the applicable environmental documents and approved by the United States Department of Transportation. For example, and not by way of limitation, a signed Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, or published Record of Decision may be required to be approved and/or completed by the United States Department of Transportation. For Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.14 Termination. 3.14.1 Notice; Reason. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, at any time by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof ("Notice of Termination"). Such termination may be for Commission's convenience or because of Consultant's failure to perform its duties and obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the failure of Consultant to timely perform Services pursuant to the Schedule of Services described in Section 3.15 of this Agreement. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.14.2 Discontinuance of Services. Upon receipt of the written Notice of Termination, Consultant shall discontinue all affected Services as directed in the Notice 5 17336.00023\9602162.1 109 or as otherwise provided herein and shall deliver to the Commission all Documents and Data, as defined in this Agreement, as may have been prepared or accumulated by Consultant in performance of the Services, whether completed or in progress. 3.14.3 Effect of Termination For Convenience. If the termination is to be for the convenience of the Commission, the Commission shall compensate Consultant for Services fully and adequately provided through the effective date of termination. Such payment shall include a prorated amount of profit, if applicable, but no amount shall be paid for anticipated profit on unperformed Services. Consultant shall provide documentation deemed adequate by Commission's Representative to show the Services actually completed by Consultant prior to the effective date of termination. This Agreement shall terminate on the effective date of the Notice of Termination. 3.14.4 Effect of Termination for Cause. If the termination is for cause, Consultant shall be compensated for those Services which have been fully and adequately completed and accepted by the Commission as of the date the Commission provides the Notice of Termination. In such case, the Commission may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise. Further, Consultant shall be liable to the Commission for any reasonable additional costs incurred by the Commission to revise work for which the Commission has compensated Consultant under this Agreement, but which the Commission has determined in its sole discretion needs to be revised, in part or whole, to complete the Project because it did not meet the standard of care established in Section 3.9. Termination of this Agreement for cause may be considered by the Commission in determining whether to enter into future agreements with Consultant. 3.14.5 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement. 3.14.6 Procurement of Similar Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated, in whole or in part, as provided by this Section, the Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it deems appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.14.7 Waivers. Consultant, in executing this Agreement, shall be deemed to have waived any and all claims for damages which may otherwise arise from the Commission's termination of this Agreement, for convenience or cause, as provided in this Section. 3.15 Schedule and Progress of Services. 3.15.1 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with any specific schedule that shall be set forth in the Task Order ("Schedule of Services"). Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with 6 17336.00023\9602162.1 110 each Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of Commission's Representative, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the relevant Schedule of Services. 3.15.2 Modification of the Schedule. Consultant shall regularly report to the Commission, through correspondence or progress reports, its progress in providing required Services within the scheduled time periods. Commission shall be promptly informed of all anticipated delays. In the event that Consultant determines that a schedule modification is necessary, Consultant shall promptly submit a revised Schedule of Services for approval by Commission's Representative. 3.15.3 Trend Meetings. Consultant shall conduct trend meetings with the Commission's Representative and other interested parties, as may be requested by the Commission. These trend meetings will encompass focused and informal discussions concerning scope, schedule, and current progress of Services, relevant cost issues, and future Project objectives. Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation and distribution of meeting agendas to be received by the Commission and other attendees no later than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. 3.15.4 Progress Reports. As part of its monthly invoice, Consultant shall submit a progress report, in a form determined by the Commission, which will indicate the progress achieved during the previous month in relation to the relevant Schedule of Services, as applicable. If applicable, submission of such progress report by Consultant shall be a condition precedent to receipt of payment from the Commission for each monthly invoice submitted. 3.16 Delay in Performance. 3.16.1 Excusable Delays. Should Consultant be delayed or prevented from the timely performance of any act or Services required by the terms of the Agreement by reason of acts of God or of the public enemy, acts or omissions of the Commission or other governmental agencies in either their sovereign or contractual capacities, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes or unusually severe weather, performance of such act shall be excused for the period of such delay. 3.16.2 Written Notice. If Consultant believes it is entitled to an extension of time due to conditions set forth in subsection 3.16.1, Consultant shall provide written notice to the Commission within seven (7) working days from the time Consultant knows, or reasonably should have known, that performance of the Services will be delayed due to such conditions. Failure of Consultant to provide such timely notice shall constitute a waiver by Consultant of any right to an excusable delay in time of performance. 3.16.3 Mutual Agreement. Performance of any Services under this Agreement may be delayed upon mutual agreement of the Parties. Upon such 7 17336.00023\9602162.1 111 agreement, Consultant's Schedule of Services shall be extended as necessary by the Commission. Consultant shall take all reasonable steps to minimize delay in completion, and additional costs, resulting from any such extension. 3.17 Status of Consultant/Subconsultants; Assignment; Transfer. 3.17.1 Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee, agent or representative of the Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel, including but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withholdings, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.17.2 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.17.3 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. If Consultant wishes to use a firm as a subcontractor which is not specified in the proposal upon which this Agreement was awarded, prior written approval must be obtained from the Commission. The Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & 8 17336.00023\9602162.1 112 Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2 Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, 9 17336.00023\9602162.1 113 be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.18.41nfringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to alleged negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of consequential damages, expert witness fees, and attorneys' fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against Commission or its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse Commission and its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Commission, its directors, officials officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant's obligations as set forth in this Section 3.19 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 3.20 Insurance. 10 17336.00023\9602162.1 114 3.20.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.20.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.20.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub -consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claim. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must "pay on behalf of" the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. 11 17336.00023\9602162.1 115 3.20.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. 0) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) bodily Injury and property damage; (2) personal Injury/advertising Injury; (3) premises/operations liability; (4) products/completed operations liability; (5) aggregate limits that apply per Project; (6) explosion, collapse and underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) contractual liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) broad form property damage; and (9) independent consultants coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to this Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from the Commission's insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. 0) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. 12 17336.00023\9602162.1 116 (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. (i) forth hereunder. Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims - made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. 13 17336.00023\9602162.1 117 (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: 3.20.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.20.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.20.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.20.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have secured all 14 17336.00023\9602162.1 118 insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 3.20.9 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.21 Fees and Payment. 3.21.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Compensation shall be on the basis of direct costs plus a fixed fee as further set forth in Exhibit "C". The total compensation per Task Order shall be set forth in the relevant Task Order, and shall not exceed said amount without written approval of the Commission's Executive Director. 3.21.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the Statement. Charges specific to each Milestone listed in the Schedule of Services shall be listed separately on an attachment to each statement. Each statement shall be accompanied by a monthly progress report and spreadsheets showing hours expended for each task for each month and the total Project to date. Each statement shall include a cover sheet bearing a certification as to the accuracy of the statement signed by the Consultant's Project Manager or other authorized officer. 3.21.3 Additional Work. Any work or activities that are in addition to, or otherwise outside of, the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall only be performed pursuant to a separate agreement between the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Commission's Executive Director may make a 15 17336.00023\9602162.1 119 change to the Agreement, other than a Cardinal Change. For purposes of this Agreement, a Cardinal Change is a change which is "outside the scope" of the Agreement; in other words, work which should not be regarded as having been fairly and reasonably within the contemplation of the parties when the Agreement was entered into. An example of a change which is not a Cardinal Change would be where, in a contract to construct a building there are many changes in the materials used, but the size and layout of the building remains the same. Cardinal Changes are not within the authority of this provision to order, and shall be processed by the Commission as "sole source" procurements according to applicable law, including the requirements of FTA Circular 4220.1 D, paragraph 9(f). A. In addition to the changes authorized above, a modification which is signed by Consultant and the Commission's Executive Director, other than a Cardinal Change, may be made in order to: (1) make a negotiated equitable adjustment to the Agreement price, delivery schedule and other terms resulting from the issuance of a Change Order, (2) reflect definitive letter contracts, and (3) reflect other agreements of the parties modifying the terms of this Agreement ("Bilateral Contract Modification"). B. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for any change, without written authorization from the Commission's Executive Director as set forth herein. In the event such a change authorization is not issued and signed by the Commission's Executive Director, Consultant shall not provide such change. 3.21.4 No Payment Prior to Approval of Work. No payment shall be made to Consultant prior to approval of any work, nor for work performed prior to approval and execution of this Agreement. 3.21.5 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by the Commission's Representative. 3.21.6 Subcontracts. All subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain the provisions of this Section 3.22 and the attached Exhibit "C". 3.22 Prohibited Interests. 3.22.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.22.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of the Commission, during the term of his or her service with the Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 16 17336.00023\9602162.1 120 3.22.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.22.4 Covenant Against Contingent Fees. As required in connection with federal funding, the Consultant warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or formation of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability pursuant to Section 3.14, or at its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 3.22.5 Covenant Against Expenditure of Local Agency, State or Federal Funds for Lobbying. The Consultant certifies that to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief no state, federal or local agency appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by or on behalf of the Consultant to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency; a Member of the State Legislature or United States Congress; an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress; or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress, in connection with the award of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. A. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency; a Member of Congress; an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress; in connection with this Agreement, the Consultant shall complete and submit the attached Exhibit "I", Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with the attached instructions. B. The Consultant's certification provided in this section is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this Agreement was entered into, and is a prerequisite for entering into this Agreement pursuant to Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code. Failure to comply with the restrictions on expenditures, or the disclosure and certification requirements set forth in Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code may result in a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. 17 17336.00023\9602162.1 121 C. The Consultant also agrees by signing this Agreement that he/she shall require that the language set forth in this Section 3.23.5 be included in all Consultant subcontracts which exceed $100,000, and that all such subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly. 3.23 Accounting Records. In accordance with State and Federal law, Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. As required in connection with federal funding, the Federal Acquisition Regulations in Title 48, CFR 31 shall be the governing factors regarding allowable elements of cost. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the Commission, the State, the State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal government having jurisdiction under Federal or State laws or regulations (including the basis of Federal funding in whole or in part) during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of any and all ledgers and books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and any other records or documents created pursuant to this Agreement. All such information shall be retained by Consultant for at least three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. Following final settlement of the contract accounts with the United States Department of Transportation under this Agreement, such records and documents may be microfilmed at the option of the Commission, but in any event shall be retained for said three (3) year period after processing of the final voucher by the United States Department of Transportation. Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain this provision. 3.23.1 The Consultant also agrees to comply with Federal procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. 3.23.2 Any costs for which payment has been made to the Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq. or under 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments, are subject to repayment by the Consultant to the Commission. 3.23.3 Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this contract that is not disposed of by agreement shall be reviewed by the Commission's Chief Financial Officer. Not later than thirty (30) days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may submit a request in writing for review of unresolved audit issues by the Commission's Chief Financial Officer. Neither the pendency of an audit dispute nor its consideration by the Commission will excuse Consultant from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Consultants and subconsultant contracts, including cost proposals and indirect cost rates (ICR), are subject to audits or reviews including a contract audit, an incurred cost audit or a certified public accountant ICR audit workpaper review. If selected for audit or review, the contract, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Part 31 18 17336.00023\9602162.1 122 and other related laws and regulations. In the instance of a certified public accountant ICR audit workpaper review, it is the Consultant's responsibility to ensure federal, state and Commission officials are allowed full access to the certified public accountant's workpapers. The contract, cost proposal and ICR shall be adjusted by Consultant and approved by the Commission to conform to the audit or review recommendations. Consultant agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the Agreement by this reference if directed by the Commission at its sole discretion. Refusal by Consultant to abide by the requirements of this Section shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement and shall be cause for termination of the Agreement and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. 3.24 Funding Requirements. It is mutually understood between the parties hereto that this Agreement may have been entered into prior to the appropriation of funds in order to avoid delays. This Agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available to the Commission and may be terminated in the sole discretion of the Commission in the event funding is unavailable or reduced. This Agreement is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions or statutes enacted by the Federal government, the State or any public agency with jurisdiction that may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this Agreement in any manner. It is mutually agreed that if sufficient funds are not appropriated, this Agreement may be amended to reflect any reduction in funds. 3.25 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 3.26 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission's written consent, prior to accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.27 Right to Employ Other Consultants. Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with the Project. 3.28 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.29 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys' fees and, all other costs of such actions. 3.30 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 19 17336.00023\9602162.1 123 3.31 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.32 Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: COMMISSION: [INSERT CONTACT INFORMATION] Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty- eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.33 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.34 Amendment or Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.35 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understandings. 3.36 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.37 Provisions Applicable When Federal Department of Transportation Funds Are Involved. When funding for the Services provided by this Agreement are provided, in whole or in part, from the United States Department of Transportation, Consultant shall also fully and adequately comply with all applicable federal requirements including, as applicable and without limitation, the provisions included in Exhibits "D" and "E" (Federal Department of Transportation Requirements and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) DBE program requirements, and the Federal Transit 20 17336.00023\9602162.1 124 Administration Requirements) and shall complete, as applicable, the forms included in Exhibits "G", "H", and "I". 3.38 Additional State Law Provisions. 3.38.1 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the Commission's offices. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.38.2 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.38.3 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub -consultant for the 21 17336.00023\9602162.1 125 employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub -consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant 3.39 Rebates, Kickbacks or Other Unlawful Consideration. Consultant warrants that this Agreement was not obtained or secured through rebates, kickbacks or other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any Commission employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right in its sole discretion: (1) to terminate the Agreement without liability; (2) to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or (3) to deduct from the contract price; or (4) otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration. 3.40 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.41 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.42 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.43 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.44 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.45 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 22 17336.00023\9602162.1 126 3.46 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. [Signatures on following page] 23 17336.00023\9602162.1 127 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL RIGHT OF WAY APPRAISAL SERVICES WITH [CONSULTANT] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY [INSERT CONSULTANT] TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: [INSERT NAME], Chair Signature Approved as to Form: Name Title Attest: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Its: Secretary General Counsel 24 17336.00023\9602162.1 128 EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "D" - FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FHWA AND CALTRANS REQUIREMENTS [Federal provisions from RFP to be inserted] EXHIBIT "E" - FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS [federal provisions from RFP to be inserted] EXHIBIT "F" - CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTANT [Federal form to be inserted] EXHIBIT "G" - DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) FORMS/COMMITMENTS [Federal form to be inserted] EXHIBIT "H" - DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES [Federal form to be inserted] EXHIBIT "I" - CERTIFICATION OF OFFEROR REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS [Federal form to be inserted] Exhibit 17336.00023\9602162.1 129 AGENDA ITEM 8H RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreements for On -Call Right of Way Appraisal Review Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award the following agreements to provide on -call right of way appraisal review services for a four-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $500,000; a) Agreement No. 15-31-057-00 with Bender Rosenthal, Inc; b) Agreement No. 15-31-101-00 with Hennessy & Hennessy, LLC; c) Agreement No. 15-31-102-00 with Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles; d) Agreement No. 15-31-103-00 with Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants; and e) Agreement No. 15-31-104-00 with R. P. Laurain & Associates, Inc.; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to contractors under the terms of the agreements. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Code of Federal Regulations, 49 CFR Part 24, Subpart A, requires that review appraisers examine the presentation and analysis of market information in all appraisals; ensure compliance with accepted practices and appropriate methodologies, as well as the Uniform Standards of Appraisal (USPAP); and support the appraisers' opinion of value. In order to comply with regulations, staff recommends that the Commission establish a list of on -call appraisers for appraisal review services. All review appraisers shall be licensed by the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers and follow USPAP, published by the Appraisal Foundation. Federal and State governments recognize the USPAP as generally accepted appraisal standards. Procurement Process Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal Agenda Item 8H 130 with price and other factors considered. Non -price factors include elements such as qualifications of firm and the ability to respond to the Commission's needs for on -call right of way appraisal review services as set forth under the terms of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 15-31-057-00. RFP No. 15-31-057-00 for on -call right of way appraisal review services was released by staff on March 3, 2015. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the RFP was posted on the Commission's PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the Commission's website. Utilizing PlanetBids, emails were sent to 14 firms, none of which are located in Riverside County. Through the PlanetBids site, 21 firms downloaded the RFP; 2 of these firms are located in Riverside County. Staff responded to all questions submitted by potential proposers prior to the March 19 clarification deadline date. Ten firms —Bender Rosenthal, Inc. (Sacramento); Epic Land Solutions, Inc. (Riverside); HDR Engineering, Inc. (Riverside); Hennessey & Hennessey LLC (Tustin); Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles (Encino); Lidgard and Associates, Inc. (Orange); Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants (Montrose); Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. (Long Beach); R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc. (Long Beach); and The Dore Group, Inc. (San Diego) — submitted responsive and responsible statements of proposals prior to the 2:00 p.m. submittal deadline on April 9. Utilizing the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP, all firms were evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of Commission staff. Based on the evaluation committee's assessment of the written proposals and pursuant to the terms of the RFP, the evaluation committee short listed and invited five firms to the interview phase of the evaluation and selection process. Interviews of the short listed firms — Bender Rosenthal, Inc.; Hennessey & Hennessey, LLC; Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles; Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants; and R. P. Laurain & Associates, Inc. — were conducted on April 30, 2015. Accordingly, the evaluation committee recommends contract award to Bender Rosenthal, Inc.; Hennessey & Hennessey, LLC; Integra Realty Resources — Los Angeles; Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants; and R. P. Laurain & Associates, Inc., as these firms earned the highest total evaluation scores. The multiple award, on -call, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity task order type contracts do not guarantee work to any of the awardees; therefore, no funds are guaranteed to any consultant. Pre -qualified consultants will be selected for specific tasks based on information contained in their proposal and/or competitive fee proposals for the specific tasks. Services will be provided through the Commission's issuance of contract task orders to the consultants on an as -needed basis. The Commission's standard form professional services agreement will be entered into with the consultants subject to any changes approved by the Executive Director, and pursuant to legal counsel review. Staff oversight of the contract will work to maximize the effectiveness of the consultants and minimize costs to the Commission. Agenda Item 8H 131 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2014/16 Amount: $ 100,000 N/A FY 2015/17+ $ 500,000 Source of Funds: Measure A, State Transportation Budget Adjustment: No Improvement Program, Federal N/A 003005 81403 00013 0000 222 3181401 003009 81403 00013 0000 222 3181401 003021 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 GL/Project Accounting No.: 003023 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 003027 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 003029 81403 00013 0000 262 31 81401 002302 81403 00013 0000 210 73 81401 005127 81403 00013 0000 210 72 81401 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \1`/44&A,54u Date: 05/20/15 Attachment: Standard Form On -Call Professional Services Agreement Agenda Item 8H 132 AGREEMENT NO. 15-31-057-00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FHWA AND/OR FTA FUNDING/ASSISTANCE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT WITH [CONSULTANT] FOR ON -CALL ON -CALL RIGHT OF WAY APPRAISAL REVIEW SERVICES 1.0 PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") and [NAME OF FIRM] ("Consultant"), a [LEGAL STATUS OF CONSULTANT, e.g., Delaware corporation]. 2.0 RECITALS. 2.1 On November 8, 1988 the voters of Riverside County approved Measure A authorizing the collection of a one-half percent (1/2 %) retail transactions and use tax (the "Tax") to fund transportation programs and improvements within the County of Riverside, and adopting the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Plan (the "Plan"). 2.2 Pursuant to Public Utility Code Sections 240000 et seq., the Commission is authorized to allocate the proceeds of the Tax in furtherance of the Plan. 2.3 On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved an extension of the Measure A tax for an additional thirty (30) years for the continued funding of transportation and improvements within the County of Riverside. 2.4 A source of funding for payment for professional services provided under this Agreement may be federal funds from the United States Department of Transportation. This Commission may withhold payment of any federal funds hereunder until the certification shown in Exhibit "F" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is executed. 2.5 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and in the task order(s) to be issued pursuant to this Agreement and executed by the Commission and the Consultant ("Task Order"). Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing on -call [INSERT 17336.00023\9602162.1 133 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES] services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California (if necessary), and is familiar with the plans of the Commission. 2.6 The Commission desires to engage Consultant to render such services on an on -call basis. Services shall be ordered by Task Order(s) to be issued pursuant to this Agreement for future projects as set forth herein (each such project shall be designated a "Project" under this Agreement). 3.0 TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant shall furnish all technical and professional services, including labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional on -call [INSERT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE] necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more generally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Services shall be more particularly described in the individual Task Orders issued by the Commission's Executive Director or designee. No Services shall be performed unless authorized by a fully executed Task Order. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the relevant Task Order, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Commencement of Services. The Consultant shall commence work within five (5) days of receiving a fully executed Task Order from Commission. 3.2.1 In the event federal funding will be used for any Task Order, and to the extent Caltrans procedures apply in connection therewith, issuance of a "Notice to Proceed" on the Task Order or written authorization by the Commission's designated project manager may be contingent upon completion and approval of a pre -award audit. Any questions raised during the pre -award audit for the Task Order shall be resolved before the Commission will consider approval of the Task Order. Any federal aid provided under a Task Order is contingent on meeting all federal requirements and could be withdrawn, thereby entitling the Commission to terminate the Task Order, if the procedures are not completed. Consultant's files shall be maintained in a manner to facilitate Federal and State process reviews. In addition, the applicable federal agency, or Caltrans acting on behalf of a federal agency, may require that prior to performance of any work for which federal reimbursement is requested and provided, that said federal agency or Caltrans must give to Commission an "Authorization to Proceed". If any post -Task Order award audit recommendations are received by the Commission from Caltrans, Consultant shall make all necessary adjustments to conform to the audit recommendations. Refusal by Consultant to incorporate the interim audit or post -Task Order award recommendations of Caltrans will be considered a breach of the Task Order and this Agreement and cause for termination or suspension of the Services. 3.3 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first set forth above or the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed by the Commission, whichever 2 17336.00023\9602162.1 134 occurs first, to the later of July 1, 2019, or the date on which all Services under a Task Order issued prior to the foregoing date have been completed, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. No Task Orders will be issued after [INSERT AGREEMENT EXPIRATION DATE]. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines set forth in the Task Orders. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect following the termination of this Agreement. 3.4 Commission's Representative. The Commission hereby designates the [INSERT NAME OR TITLE], or his or her designee, to act as its Representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of the Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Commission's Representative shall also review and give approval, as needed, to the details of Consultant's work as it progresses. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 3.5 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates [INSERT NAME OR TITLE], or his or her designee, to act as its Representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to act on behalf of Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his professional skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement and as described in the relevant Task Order. Consultant shall work closely and cooperate fully with Commission's Representative and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction over, or an interest in, the Services. Consultant's Representative shall be available to the Commission staff at all reasonable times. Any substitution in Consultant's Representative shall be approved in writing by Commission's Representative. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval by the Commission. In the event that the Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of the key personnel, the Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.14. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are: [INSERT NAME(S)] 3.7 Preliminary Review of Work. All reports, working papers, and similar work products prepared for submission in the course of providing Services under this Agreement shall be submitted to the Commission's Representative in draft form, and the Commission may require revisions of such drafts prior to formal submission and approval. In the event plans and designs are to be developed as part of the Project, final 3 17336.00023\9602162.1 135 detailed plans and designs shall be contingent upon obtaining environmental clearance as may be required in connection with Federal funding. In the event that Commission's Representative, in his sole discretion, determines the formally submitted work product to be not in accordance with the standard of care established under this contract, Commission's Representative may require Consultant to revise and resubmit the work at no cost to the Commission. 3.8 Appearance at Hearings. If and when required by the Commission, Consultant shall render assistance at public hearings or other meetings related to the Project or necessary to the performance of the Services. However, Consultant shall not be required to, and will not, render any decision, interpretation or recommendation regarding questions of a legal nature or which may be construed as constituting a legal opinion. 3.9 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform all Services, duties and obligations required by this Agreement to fully and adequately complete the Project. Consultant shall perform the Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California during the term of this Agreement. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Consultant further represents and warrants to the Commission that its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the Commission, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. Any employee of Consultant or its sub -consultants who is determined by the Commission to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the Commission, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project. 3.10 Opportunity to Cure. Commission may provide Consultant an opportunity to cure, at Consultant's expense, all errors and omissions which may be disclosed during Project implementation. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a timely manner, such correction may be made by the Commission, and the cost thereof charged to Consultant. 3.11 Inspection of Work. Consultant shall allow the Commission's Representative to inspect or review Consultant's work in progress at any reasonable time. 4 17336.00023\9602162.1 136 3.12 Final Acceptance. Upon determination by the Commission that Consultant has satisfactorily completed the Services required under this Agreement and within the term set forth in Section 3.3, the Commission shall give Consultant a written Notice of Final Acceptance. Upon receipt of such notice, Consultant shall incur no further costs hereunder, unless otherwise specified in the Notice of Final Acceptance. Consultant may request issuance of a Notice of Final Acceptance when, in its opinion, it has satisfactorily completed all Services required under the terms of this Agreement. In the event copyrights are permitted under this Agreement, then in connection with Federal funding, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the United States Department of Transportation shall have the royalty -free non-exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, the work for governmental purposes. 3.13 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. For example, and not by way of limitation, Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all implementing regulations, design standards, specifications, previous commitments that must be incorporated in the design of the Project, and administrative controls including those of the United States Department of Transportation. Compliance with Federal procedures may include completion of the applicable environmental documents and approved by the United States Department of Transportation. For example, and not by way of limitation, a signed Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, or published Record of Decision may be required to be approved and/or completed by the United States Department of Transportation. For Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.14 Termination. 3.14.1 Notice; Reason. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, at any time by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof ("Notice of Termination"). Such termination may be for Commission's convenience or because of Consultant's failure to perform its duties and obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the failure of Consultant to timely perform Services pursuant to the Schedule of Services described in Section 3.15 of this Agreement. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.14.2 Discontinuance of Services. Upon receipt of the written Notice of Termination, Consultant shall discontinue all affected Services as directed in the Notice 5 17336.00023\9602162.1 137 or as otherwise provided herein and shall deliver to the Commission all Documents and Data, as defined in this Agreement, as may have been prepared or accumulated by Consultant in performance of the Services, whether completed or in progress. 3.14.3 Effect of Termination For Convenience. If the termination is to be for the convenience of the Commission, the Commission shall compensate Consultant for Services fully and adequately provided through the effective date of termination. Such payment shall include a prorated amount of profit, if applicable, but no amount shall be paid for anticipated profit on unperformed Services. Consultant shall provide documentation deemed adequate by Commission's Representative to show the Services actually completed by Consultant prior to the effective date of termination. This Agreement shall terminate on the effective date of the Notice of Termination. 3.14.4 Effect of Termination for Cause. If the termination is for cause, Consultant shall be compensated for those Services which have been fully and adequately completed and accepted by the Commission as of the date the Commission provides the Notice of Termination. In such case, the Commission may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise. Further, Consultant shall be liable to the Commission for any reasonable additional costs incurred by the Commission to revise work for which the Commission has compensated Consultant under this Agreement, but which the Commission has determined in its sole discretion needs to be revised, in part or whole, to complete the Project because it did not meet the standard of care established in Section 3.9. Termination of this Agreement for cause may be considered by the Commission in determining whether to enter into future agreements with Consultant. 3.14.5 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement. 3.14.6 Procurement of Similar Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated, in whole or in part, as provided by this Section, the Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it deems appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.14.7 Waivers. Consultant, in executing this Agreement, shall be deemed to have waived any and all claims for damages which may otherwise arise from the Commission's termination of this Agreement, for convenience or cause, as provided in this Section. 3.15 Schedule and Progress of Services. 3.15.1 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with any specific schedule that shall be set forth in the Task Order ("Schedule of Services"). Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with 6 17336.00023\9602162.1 138 each Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of Commission's Representative, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the relevant Schedule of Services. 3.15.2 Modification of the Schedule. Consultant shall regularly report to the Commission, through correspondence or progress reports, its progress in providing required Services within the scheduled time periods. Commission shall be promptly informed of all anticipated delays. In the event that Consultant determines that a schedule modification is necessary, Consultant shall promptly submit a revised Schedule of Services for approval by Commission's Representative. 3.15.3 Trend Meetings. Consultant shall conduct trend meetings with the Commission's Representative and other interested parties, as may be requested by the Commission. These trend meetings will encompass focused and informal discussions concerning scope, schedule, and current progress of Services, relevant cost issues, and future Project objectives. Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation and distribution of meeting agendas to be received by the Commission and other attendees no later than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. 3.15.4 Progress Reports. As part of its monthly invoice, Consultant shall submit a progress report, in a form determined by the Commission, which will indicate the progress achieved during the previous month in relation to the relevant Schedule of Services, as applicable. If applicable, submission of such progress report by Consultant shall be a condition precedent to receipt of payment from the Commission for each monthly invoice submitted. 3.16 Delay in Performance. 3.16.1 Excusable Delays. Should Consultant be delayed or prevented from the timely performance of any act or Services required by the terms of the Agreement by reason of acts of God or of the public enemy, acts or omissions of the Commission or other governmental agencies in either their sovereign or contractual capacities, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes or unusually severe weather, performance of such act shall be excused for the period of such delay. 3.16.2 Written Notice. If Consultant believes it is entitled to an extension of time due to conditions set forth in subsection 3.16.1, Consultant shall provide written notice to the Commission within seven (7) working days from the time Consultant knows, or reasonably should have known, that performance of the Services will be delayed due to such conditions. Failure of Consultant to provide such timely notice shall constitute a waiver by Consultant of any right to an excusable delay in time of performance. 3.16.3 Mutual Agreement. Performance of any Services under this Agreement may be delayed upon mutual agreement of the Parties. Upon such 7 17336.00023\9602162.1 139 agreement, Consultant's Schedule of Services shall be extended as necessary by the Commission. Consultant shall take all reasonable steps to minimize delay in completion, and additional costs, resulting from any such extension. 3.17 Status of Consultant/Subconsultants; Assignment; Transfer. 3.17.1 Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee, agent or representative of the Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel, including but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withholdings, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.17.2 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.17.3 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. If Consultant wishes to use a firm as a subcontractor which is not specified in the proposal upon which this Agreement was awarded, prior written approval must be obtained from the Commission. The Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & 8 17336.00023\9602162.1 140 Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2 Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, 9 17336.00023\9602162.1 141 be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.18.41nfringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to alleged negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of consequential damages, expert witness fees, and attorneys' fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against Commission or its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse Commission and its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Commission, its directors, officials officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant's obligations as set forth in this Section 3.19 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 3.20 Insurance. 10 17336.00023\9602162.1 142 3.20.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.20.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.20.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub -consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claim. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must "pay on behalf of" the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. 11 17336.00023\9602162.1 143 3.20.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. 0) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) bodily Injury and property damage; (2) personal Injury/advertising Injury; (3) premises/operations liability; (4) products/completed operations liability; (5) aggregate limits that apply per Project; (6) explosion, collapse and underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) contractual liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) broad form property damage; and (9) independent consultants coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to this Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from the Commission's insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. 0) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. 12 17336.00023\9602162.1 144 (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. (i) forth hereunder. Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims - made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. 13 17336.00023\9602162.1 145 (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: 3.20.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.20.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.20.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.20.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have secured all 14 17336.00023\9602162.1 146 insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 3.20.9 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.21 Fees and Payment. 3.21.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Compensation shall be on the basis of direct costs plus a fixed fee as further set forth in Exhibit "C". The total compensation per Task Order shall be set forth in the relevant Task Order, and shall not exceed said amount without written approval of the Commission's Executive Director. 3.21.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the Statement. Charges specific to each Milestone listed in the Schedule of Services shall be listed separately on an attachment to each statement. Each statement shall be accompanied by a monthly progress report and spreadsheets showing hours expended for each task for each month and the total Project to date. Each statement shall include a cover sheet bearing a certification as to the accuracy of the statement signed by the Consultant's Project Manager or other authorized officer. 3.21.3 Additional Work. Any work or activities that are in addition to, or otherwise outside of, the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall only be performed pursuant to a separate agreement between the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Commission's Executive Director may make a 15 17336.00023\9602162.1 147 change to the Agreement, other than a Cardinal Change. For purposes of this Agreement, a Cardinal Change is a change which is "outside the scope" of the Agreement; in other words, work which should not be regarded as having been fairly and reasonably within the contemplation of the parties when the Agreement was entered into. An example of a change which is not a Cardinal Change would be where, in a contract to construct a building there are many changes in the materials used, but the size and layout of the building remains the same. Cardinal Changes are not within the authority of this provision to order, and shall be processed by the Commission as "sole source" procurements according to applicable law, including the requirements of FTA Circular 4220.1 D, paragraph 9(f). A. In addition to the changes authorized above, a modification which is signed by Consultant and the Commission's Executive Director, other than a Cardinal Change, may be made in order to: (1) make a negotiated equitable adjustment to the Agreement price, delivery schedule and other terms resulting from the issuance of a Change Order, (2) reflect definitive letter contracts, and (3) reflect other agreements of the parties modifying the terms of this Agreement ("Bilateral Contract Modification"). B. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for any change, without written authorization from the Commission's Executive Director as set forth herein. In the event such a change authorization is not issued and signed by the Commission's Executive Director, Consultant shall not provide such change. 3.21.4 No Payment Prior to Approval of Work. No payment shall be made to Consultant prior to approval of any work, nor for work performed prior to approval and execution of this Agreement. 3.21.5 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by the Commission's Representative. 3.21.6 Subcontracts. All subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain the provisions of this Section 3.22 and the attached Exhibit "C". 3.22 Prohibited Interests. 3.22.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.22.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of the Commission, during the term of his or her service with the Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 16 17336.00023\9602162.1 148 3.22.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.22.4 Covenant Against Contingent Fees. As required in connection with federal funding, the Consultant warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or formation of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability pursuant to Section 3.14, or at its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 3.22.5 Covenant Against Expenditure of Local Agency, State or Federal Funds for Lobbying. The Consultant certifies that to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief no state, federal or local agency appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by or on behalf of the Consultant to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency; a Member of the State Legislature or United States Congress; an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress; or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress, in connection with the award of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. A. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency; a Member of Congress; an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress; in connection with this Agreement, the Consultant shall complete and submit the attached Exhibit "I", Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with the attached instructions. B. The Consultant's certification provided in this section is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this Agreement was entered into, and is a prerequisite for entering into this Agreement pursuant to Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code. Failure to comply with the restrictions on expenditures, or the disclosure and certification requirements set forth in Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code may result in a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. 17 17336.00023\9602162.1 149 C. The Consultant also agrees by signing this Agreement that he/she shall require that the language set forth in this Section 3.23.5 be included in all Consultant subcontracts which exceed $100,000, and that all such subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly. 3.23 Accounting Records. In accordance with State and Federal law, Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. As required in connection with federal funding, the Federal Acquisition Regulations in Title 48, CFR 31 shall be the governing factors regarding allowable elements of cost. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the Commission, the State, the State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal government having jurisdiction under Federal or State laws or regulations (including the basis of Federal funding in whole or in part) during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of any and all ledgers and books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and any other records or documents created pursuant to this Agreement. All such information shall be retained by Consultant for at least three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. Following final settlement of the contract accounts with the United States Department of Transportation under this Agreement, such records and documents may be microfilmed at the option of the Commission, but in any event shall be retained for said three (3) year period after processing of the final voucher by the United States Department of Transportation. Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain this provision. 3.23.1 The Consultant also agrees to comply with Federal procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. 3.23.2 Any costs for which payment has been made to the Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq. or under 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments, are subject to repayment by the Consultant to the Commission. 3.23.3 Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this contract that is not disposed of by agreement shall be reviewed by the Commission's Chief Financial Officer. Not later than thirty (30) days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may submit a request in writing for review of unresolved audit issues by the Commission's Chief Financial Officer. Neither the pendency of an audit dispute nor its consideration by the Commission will excuse Consultant from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Consultants and subconsultant contracts, including cost proposals and indirect cost rates (ICR), are subject to audits or reviews including a contract audit, an incurred cost audit or a certified public accountant ICR audit workpaper review. If selected for audit or review, the contract, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Part 31 18 17336.00023\9602162.1 150 and other related laws and regulations. In the instance of a certified public accountant ICR audit workpaper review, it is the Consultant's responsibility to ensure federal, state and Commission officials are allowed full access to the certified public accountant's workpapers. The contract, cost proposal and ICR shall be adjusted by Consultant and approved by the Commission to conform to the audit or review recommendations. Consultant agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the Agreement by this reference if directed by the Commission at its sole discretion. Refusal by Consultant to abide by the requirements of this Section shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement and shall be cause for termination of the Agreement and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. 3.24 Funding Requirements. It is mutually understood between the parties hereto that this Agreement may have been entered into prior to the appropriation of funds in order to avoid delays. This Agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available to the Commission and may be terminated in the sole discretion of the Commission in the event funding is unavailable or reduced. This Agreement is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions or statutes enacted by the Federal government, the State or any public agency with jurisdiction that may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this Agreement in any manner. It is mutually agreed that if sufficient funds are not appropriated, this Agreement may be amended to reflect any reduction in funds. 3.25 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 3.26 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission's written consent, prior to accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.27 Right to Employ Other Consultants. Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with the Project. 3.28 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.29 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys' fees and, all other costs of such actions. 3.30 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 19 17336.00023\9602162.1 151 3.31 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.32 Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: COMMISSION: [INSERT CONTACT INFORMATION] Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty- eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.33 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.34 Amendment or Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.35 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understandings. 3.36 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.37 Provisions Applicable When Federal Department of Transportation Funds Are Involved. When funding for the Services provided by this Agreement are provided, in whole or in part, from the United States Department of Transportation, Consultant shall also fully and adequately comply with all applicable federal requirements including, as applicable and without limitation, the provisions included in Exhibits "D" and "E" (Federal Department of Transportation Requirements and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) DBE program requirements, and the Federal Transit 20 17336.00023\9602162.1 152 Administration Requirements) and shall complete, as applicable, the forms included in Exhibits "G", "H", and "I". 3.38 Additional State Law Provisions. 3.38.1 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the Commission's offices. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.38.2 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.38.3 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub -consultant for the 21 17336.00023\9602162.1 153 employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub -consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant 3.39 Rebates, Kickbacks or Other Unlawful Consideration. Consultant warrants that this Agreement was not obtained or secured through rebates, kickbacks or other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any Commission employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right in its sole discretion: (1) to terminate the Agreement without liability; (2) to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or (3) to deduct from the contract price; or (4) otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration. 3.40 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.41 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.42 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.43 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.44 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.45 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 22 17336.00023\9602162.1 154 3.46 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. [Signatures on following page] 23 17336.00023\9602162.1 155 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL RIGHT OF WAY APPRAISAL REVIEW SERVICES WITH [CONSULTANT] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY [INSERT CONSULTANT] TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: [INSERT NAME], Chair Signature Approved as to Form: Name Title Attest: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Its: Secretary General Counsel 24 17336.00023\9602162.1 156 EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "D" - FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FHWA AND CALTRANS REQUIREMENTS [Federal provisions from RFP to be inserted] EXHIBIT "E" - FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS [federal provisions from RFP to be inserted] EXHIBIT "F" - CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTANT [Federal form to be inserted] EXHIBIT "G" - DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) FORMS/COMMITMENTS [Federal form to be inserted] EXHIBIT "H" - DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES [Federal form to be inserted] EXHIBIT "I" - CERTIFICATION OF OFFEROR REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS [Federal form to be inserted] Exhibit 17336.00023\9602162.1 157 AGENDA ITEM 81 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Patricia Castillo, Capital Projects Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State Route 60 Truck Climbing/Descending Lane Project — Right of Way Funding Increase STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the programming of 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds in the amount of $1,497,000 for the State Route 60 truck climbing lane/descending lane project right of way (ROW) phase; 2) Approve Agreement No. 12-31-092-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 12-31-092-00, with Caltrans to revise the right of way roles and responsibilities for the State Route 60 truck climbing lane/descending lane project, including current funding commitments; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute utility agreements and future agreements with Caltrans within approved funding amounts, on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The State Route 60 truck climbing lane/descending lane project is located east of Moreno Valley from Gilman Springs Road to Jack Rabbit Trail. The project scope includes an eastbound truck climbing lane and a westbound truck descending lane plus inside and outside standard shoulders. The project is a combination of a Caltrans-sponsored safety project to construct shoulders and the Commission's project to construct the truck lanes, as well as a Caltrans- sponsored pavement rehabilitation project. At its February 2012 workshop, the Commission agreed to sponsor the project with Caltrans taking the lead on the project approval and environmental document (PA&ED) phase. Caltrans contributed $2 million in State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) funds for PA&ED and $1.5 million of SHOPP funding for the plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) phase. The Commission approved the programming of $3 million in Congestion Mitigation and Agenda Item 81 158 Air Quality (CMAQ) funds that were subsequently replaced with federal earmarks. Caltrans is nearing completion of the environmental phase, with PA&ED scheduled for completion in June 2015. The current estimate of construction cost is $112 million. At its June 11, 2014 meeting, the Commission approved the reprogramming and obligation of $7 million in CMAQ funds for PS&E and $550,000 of State Transportation Improvement Program funds for ROW phase. Since that time, Caltrans requested the Commission take the lead role in the ROW phase. Therefore, staff has been working with Caltrans to amend the cooperative agreement to define respective roles and responsibilities for the PS&E and ROW phases, which are expected to begin in July 2015. Caltrans is still taking the lead on the PS&E phase, and the Commission will be responsible for the ROW support and capital activities. ROW support costs are estimated at $550,000. ROW capital costs include ROW acquisitions and utility relocations. ROW acquisitions are estimated at $747,000. Utility relocations are currently estimated to cost $750,000. Design and construction management activities for the utility relocations will be performed by the utility owners and reimbursed by the Commission. Staff is recommending the Commission authorize the Executive Director to execute each utility agreement on behalf of the Commission. To cover the additional ROW capital costs, staff is proposing to program $1,497,000 of 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds for the ROW utility relocation and acquisition costs. In addition, the cooperative agreement is also being amended to reflect committed funds to date. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2015/16 Amount: $1,044,000 N/A FY 2016/17+ $1,003,000 2009 Measure A Western Riverside No Source of Funds: Budget Adjustment: County Highways, STIP N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 003029 81401 00000 0000 262 31 81401 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \i/ilitAiciatimm Date: 05/26/15 Attachment: Draft Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans Agenda Item 81 159 REVISION TO THE ATTACHMENT TO AGENDA ITEM 81 Additions are noted by Bold Italics, Deletions are noted by Strikethrough AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 Right of Way (R/W) 45. As IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for R/W, RCTC is responsible for all R/W SUPPORT WORK except those R/W SUPPORT activities and responsibilities that are assigned to another PARTNER in this AGREEMENT and those activities that may be specifically excluded. 46. The selection of R/W personnel and WORK within the completed PROJECT's SHS right-of- way will be performed in accordance with federal and California laws and regulations, and CALTRANS' policies, procedures, standards, practices, and applicable agreements. 47. RCTC will make all necessary arrangements with utility owners for the timely accommodation, protection, relocation, or removal of any existing utility facilities that conflict with construction of the PROJECT or that violate CALTRANS' encroachment policy. 48. RCTC will provide CALTRANS a copy of conflict maps, Relocation Plans, proposed Notices to Owner, Reports of Investigation, and Utility Agreements (if applicable) for CALTRANS' concurrence prior to issuing the Notices to Owner and executing the Utility Agreement. All utility conflicts will be fully addressed prior to Right of Way Certification and all arrangements for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities will be completed prior to construction contract award and included in the PROJECT plans, specifications, and estimate. 49. RCTC will determine the cost to positively identify and locate, protect, relocate, or remove any utility facilities whether inside or outside SHS right-of-way in accordance with federal and California laws and regulations, and CALTRANS' policies, procedures, standards, practices, and applicable agreements including but not limited to Freeway Master Contracts.. 50. RCTC will provide a land surveyor licensed in the State of California to be responsible for surveying and right-of-way engineering. All survey and right-of-way engineering documents will bear the professional seal, certificate number, registration classification, expiration date of certificate, and signature of the responsible surveyor. 51. RCTC will utilize a public agency currently qualified by CALTRANS or a properly licensed consultant for all right-of-way activities. A qualified right-of-way agent will administer all right-of-way consultant contracts. RCTC will submit a draft Right of Way Certification document to CALTRANS six weeks prior to the scheduled Right of Way Certification milestone date for review. RCTC will submit a final Right of Way certification document to CALTRANS for approval prior to the PROJECT Ready to List advertisement. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 8 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 52. Physical and legal possession of right-of-way must be completed prior to Ready to List construction advertisement, unless PARTNERS mutually agree to other arrangements in writing. Right of way conveyances must be completed prior to OBLIGATION COMPLETION, unless RCTC mutually agree to other arrangements in writing. 53. RCTC agrees to first acquire any necessary rights -of -way in its own name. Prior to the closeout of this AGREEMENT, RCTC shall transfer title to said rights -of -way, free and clear of all encumbrances and liens, to the State. CALTRANS' acceptance of right-of-way title is subject to review of an Updated Preliminary Title Report provided by RCTC verifying that the title is free of all encumbrances and liens. Upon acceptance, PARTNER NAME will provide CALTRANS with a Policy of Title Insurance in CALTRANS' name. 54. RCTC certifies that it is authorized to hear and, if appropriate, issue Resolutions of Necessity for the PROJECT. RCTC agrees to be responsible for hearing and adopting Resolutions of Necessity for the PROJECT. RCTC is responsible for all work associated with hearing and adopting Resolutions of Necessity. RCTC is responsible for conducting and documenting the functional equivalent of the CALTRANS District Condemnation Evaluation Meeting and the CALTRANS Condemnation Panel Review Meetings. CALTRANS Right of Way staff will be included on any functional equivalent of a Condemnation Panel Review Meeting. CALTRANS' concurrence is required, in advance, for any exception to CALTRANS' or FHWA's right-of- way policies, procedures, or standards. Schedule 55. PARTNERS will manage the schedule for OBLIGATIONS through the work plan included in the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN. Additional Provisions 56. PARTNERS will perform all OBLIGATIONS in accordance with federal and California laws, regulations, and standards; FHWA STANDARDS; and CALTRANS STANDARDS. 57. CALTRANS retains the right to reject noncompliant WORK, protect public safety, preserve property rights, and ensure that all WORK is in the best interest of the SHS. 58. Each PARTNER will ensure that personnel participating in OBLIGATIONS are appropriately qualified or licensed to perform the tasks assigned to them. 59. PARTNERS will invite each other to participate in the selection of any consultants who participate in OBLIGATIONS. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 9 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 EA ON69U 08-RIV-60-22.1/26.5 REPLACEMENT AGREEMENT (AMENDMENT NO. 3) This AGREEMENT, effective on , is between the State of California, acting through its Department of Transportation, referred to as CALTRANS, and: Riverside County Transportation Commission, a public corporation/entity, referred to hereinafter as RCTC. RECITALS 1. PARTNERS are authorized to enter into a cooperative agreement for improvements to the state highway system (SHS) per the California Streets and Highways Code sections 114 and 130. 2. The PARTNERS hereto entered into Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) Agreement 08-1543 on July 26, 2012, said AGREEMENT defining the terms and conditions for addition of eastbound truck climbing lane and westbound truck descending lane, and upgrading existing inside and outside shoulder to current standards on State Route 60 (SR- 60) between Gilman Springs Road (PM 22.2) and Jack Rabbit Trail (PM 26.5). 3. PARTNERS entered into Amendment No. 1 to AGREEMENT on October 23, 2012, to replace CMAQ funds with Earmark funds. 4. PARTNERS entered into a Replacement Agreement (Amendment No. 2) to include Plans, Specification and Estimates (PS&E), Right of Way Support, Right of Way Capital within the scope of the AGREEMENT. PARTNERS entered into this Replacement AGREEMENT in order to replace and supersede the terms of the old AGREEMENT (08-1543), as amended by Amendment No.1, in its entirety with 08-1543 A/2 to reflect the change in the scope of WORK, and to include the correct post miles. 5. PARTNERS now have agreed to enter into a Replacement Agreement (AMENDMENT NO. 3) for CALTRANS to be the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for PA&ED and PS&E and RCTC to be the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for Right of Way Support, Right of Way Capital within the scope of the AGREEMENT. PARTNERS now enter into this Replacement AGREEMENT in order to replace and supersede the terms of the old AGREEMENT (08-1543), as amended by Amendment No.1 and Amendment 2, in its entirety with 08-1543 A/3 to reflect the change in the scope of WORK. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Cre160 ated 03/23/15) 1 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 6. For the purpose of this AGREEMENT, addition of eastbound truck climbing lane and westbound truck descending lane, and upgrading existing inside and outside shoulder to current standards on State Route 60 (SR-60) between Gilman Springs Road (PM 22.1) and Jack Rabbit Trail (PM 26.5) will be referred to hereinafter as PROJECT. The project scope of work is defined in the PROJECT initiation and approval documents (e.g. Project Study Report, Permit Engineering Evaluation Report, or Project Report). 7. All responsibilities assigned in this AGREEMENT to complete the following PROJECT COMPONENTS will be referred to hereinafter as OBLIGATIONS: • Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) • Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) • Right of Way Support (R/W SUPPORT) • Right of Way Capital (R/W CAPITAL) 8. This AGREEMENT is separate from and does not modify or replace any other cooperative agreement or memorandum of understanding between PARTNERS regarding the PROJECT. 9. The following work associated with this PROJECT has been completed or is in progress. • CALTRANS developed the Project Initiation Document (PID), relevant to the scope of the PROJECT under EA ON690, Project ID 0800000537 and under EA OQ180, Project ID 0800020220. The Scope from both of these PIDs have been incorporated under this PROJECT. The SHOPP funds programmed under EA OQ180 is available for this PROJECT. 10. In this AGREEMENT capitalized words represent defined terms, initialisms, or acronyms. 11. PARTNERS hereby set forth the terms, covenants, and conditions of this AGREEMENT, under which they will accomplish OBLIGATIONS. RESPONSIBILITIES Sponsorship 12. RCTC is the SPONSOR for the PROJECT COMPONENTS in this AGREEMENT. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crc ted 03/23/15) 2 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 Funding 13. FUNDING PARTNERS, funding sources, funding limits, spending limits, and invoicing/payment details are documented in the FUNDING SUMMARY. The FUNDING SUMMARY is incorporated and made an express part of this AGREEMENT. PARTNERS will execute a new FUNDING SUMMARY each time the funding details change. The FUNDING SUMMARY will be executed by a legally authorized representative of the respective PARTNERS. The most current fully executed FUNDING SUMMARY supersedes any previous FUNDING SUMMARY created for this AGREEMENT. Replacement of the FUNDING SUMMARY will not require an amendment to the body of this AGREEMENT unless the funding changes require it. 14. PARTNERS will not incur costs beyond the funding commitments in this AGREEMENT. 15. Unless otherwise documented in the FUNDING SUMMARY, all fund types contributed to a PROJECT COMPONENT will be spent proportionately within that PROJECT COMPONENT. 16. Unless otherwise documented in the FUNDING SUMMARY, any savings recognized within a PROJECT COMPONENT will be credited or reimbursed, when allowed by policy or law, in proportion to the amount contributed to that PROJECT COMPONENT by each fund type. 17. All costs incurred for WORK except those that are specifically excluded in this AGREEMENT are OBLIGATIONS COSTS. OBLIGATIONS COSTS are to be paid from the funds shown in the FUNDING SUMMARY. Costs that are not OBLIGATIONS COSTS are to be paid by the PARTNER incurring the costs from funds that are outside the scope of this AGREEMENT. Implementing Agency 18. CALTRANS is the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for PA&ED. 19. CALTRANS is the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for PS&E. 20. RCTC is the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for RIGHT OF WAY. 21. The IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for a PROJECT COMPONENT will provide a Quality Management Plan (QMP) for that component as part of the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Quality Management Plan describes the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY's quality policy and how it will be used. The Quality Management Plan is subject to CALTRANS review and approval. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crc cd 03/23/15) 3 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 22. Any PARTNER responsible for completing WORK shall make its personnel and consultants that prepare WORK available to help resolve WORK -related problems and changes for the entire duration of the PROJECT including PROJECT COMPONENT work that may occur under separate agreements. Independent Quality Assurance 23. CALTRANS will provide Independent Quality Assurance for the portions of WORK within the existing and proposed SHS right-of-way. CALTRANS' Independent Quality Assurance efforts are to ensure that RCTC'S quality assurance activities result in WORK being developed in accordance with the applicable standards and within an established Quality Management Plan. Independent Quality Assurance does not include any efforts necessary to develop or deliver WORK or any validation by verifying or rechecking work performed by another PARTY. When CALTRANS performs Independent Quality Assurance it does so for its own benefit. No one can assign liability to CALTRANS due to its Independent Quality Assurance. The cost of CALTRANS' Independent Quality Assurance is not an OBLIGATIONS COST. Environmental Document Quality Control (EDQC) Program 24. Per NEPA assignment and CEQA statutes, CALTRANS will perform Environmental Document Quality Control and NEPA Assignment Review Procedures for environmental documentation. CALTRANS quality control and quality assurance procedures for all environmental documents are described in the Jay Norvell Memos dated October 1, 2012 (available at http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/memos.htm#LinkTarget_705). This also includes the independent judgment analysis and determination under CEQA that the environmental documentation meets CEQA requirements. CEQA/NEPA Lead Agency 25. CALTRANS is the CEQA lead agency for the PROJECT. 26. CALTRANS is the NEPA lead agency for the PROJECT. Environmental Permits, Approvals and Agreements 27. PARTNERS will comply with the commitments and conditions set forth in the environmental documentation, environmental permits, approvals, and applicable agreements as those commitments and conditions apply to each PARTNER's responsibilities in this AGREEMENT. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crc mad 03/23/15) 4 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 28. Unless otherwise assigned in this AGREEMENT, the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for a PROJECT COMPONENT is responsible for all PROJECT COMPONENT WORK associated with coordinating, obtaining, implementing, renewing, and amending the PROJECT permits, agreements, and approvals whether they are identified in the planned project scope of work or become necessary in the course of completing the PROJECT. 29. The PROJECT requires the following environmental requirements/approvals: ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS/REQUIREMENTS 404, US Army Corps Of Engineers 401, Regional Water Quality Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), State Water Resources Control Board 1602 California Department of Fish and Wildlife FESA Section 7 USFWS Multispecies Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency/Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP): United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and Riverside Conservation Agency (RCA). Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) 30. As IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for PA&ED, CALTRANS is responsible for all PA&ED WORK except those PA&ED activities and responsibilities that are assigned to another PARTNER in this AGREEMENT and those activities that may be specifically excluded. 31. Any PARTNER preparing environmental documentation, including studies and reports, will ensure that qualified personnel remain available to help resolve environmental issues and perform any necessary work to ensure that the PROJECT remains in environmental compliance. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 32. CALTRANS will determine the type of CEQA documentation and will cause that documentation to be prepared in accordance with CEQA requirements. 33. Any PARTNER involved in the preparation of CEQA environmental documentation will prepare the documentation to meet CEQA requirements and follow CALTRANS' standards that apply to the CEQA process. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crc 64 ted 03/23/15) 5 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 34. Any PARTNER preparing any portion of the CEQA environmental documentation, including any studies and reports, will submit that portion of the documentation to the CEQA Lead Agency for review, comment, and approval at appropriate stages of development prior to public availability. 35. CALTRANS will attend all CEQA-related public meetings. 36. If a PARTNER who is not the CEQA lead agency holds a public meeting about the PROJECT, that PARTNER must clearly state its role in the PROJECT and the identity of the CEQA lead agency on all meeting publications. All meeting publications must also inform the attendees that public comments collected at the meetings are not part of the CEQA public review process. That PARTNER will submit all meeting advertisements, agendas, exhibits, handouts, and materials to the CEQA lead agency for review, comment, and approval at least ten (10) working days prior to publication or use. If that PARTNER makes any changes to the materials, it will allow the CEQA lead agency to review, comment on, and approve those changes at least three (3) working days prior to the public meeting date. The CEQA lead agency maintains final editorial control with respect to text or graphics that could lead to public confusion over CEQA-related roles and responsibilities. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 37. Pursuant to Chapter 3 of Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C. 326) and 23 U.S.C. 327, CALTRANS is the NEPA lead agency for the PROJECT. CALTRANS is responsible for NEPA compliance, will determine the type of NEPA documentation, and will cause that documentation to be prepared in accordance with NEPA requirements. CALTRANS, as the NEPA lead agency for PROJECT, will review, comment, and approve all environmental documentation (including, but not limited to, studies, reports, public notices, and public meeting materials, determinations, administrative drafts, and final environmental documents) at appropriate stages of development prior to approval and public availability. When required as NEPA lead agency, CALTRANS will conduct consultation and coordination and obtain, renew, or amend approvals pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act, and Essential Fish Habitat. When required as NEPA lead agency, CALTRANS will conduct consultation and coordination approvals pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crc 65 ted 03/23/15) 6 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 38. Any PARTNER involved in the preparation of NEPA environmental documentation will follow FHWA and CALTRANS STANDARDS that apply to the NEPA process including, but not limited to, the guidance provided in the FHWA Environmental Guidebook (available at www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/index.htm) and the CALTRANS Standard Environmental Reference. 39. Any PARTNER preparing any portion of the NEPA environmental documentation (including, but not limited to, studies, reports, public notices, and public meeting materials, determinations, administrative drafts, and final environmental documents) will submit that portion of the documentation to CALTRANS for CALTRANS' review, comment, and approval prior to public availability. 40. CALTRANS will prepare, publicize, and circulate all NEPA-related public notices. CALTRANS will work with the appropriate federal agency to publish notices in the Federal Register. 41. CALTRANS will attend all NEPA-related public meetings. 42. If a PARTNER who is not the NEPA lead agency holds a public meeting about the PROJECT, that PARTNER must clearly state its role in the PROJECT and the identity of the NEPA lead agency on all meeting publications. All meeting publications must also inform the attendees that public comments collected at the meetings are not part of the NEPA public review process. That PARTNER will submit all meeting advertisements, agendas, exhibits, handouts, and materials to the NEPA lead agency for review, comment, and approval at least ten (10) working days prior to publication or use. If that PARTNER makes any changes to the materials, it will allow the NEPA lead agency to review, comment on, and approve those changes at least three (3) working days prior to the public meeting date. The NEPA lead agency has final approval authority with respect to text or graphics that could lead to public confusion over NEPA-related roles and responsibilities. Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) 43. As IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for PS&E, CALTRANS is responsible for all PS&E WORK except those PS&E activities and responsibilities that are assigned to another PARTNER in this AGREEMENT and those activities that may be specifically excluded. 44. CALTRANS will prepare Utility Conflict Maps identifying the accommodation, protection, relocation, or removal of any existing utility facilities that conflict with construction of the PROJECT or that violate CALTRANS' encroachment policy. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Cr a cad 03/23/15) 7 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 Right of Wav (R/W) 45. As IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for R/W, RCTC is responsible for all R/W SUPPORT WORK except those R/W SUPPORT activities and responsibilities that are assigned to another PARTNER in this AGREEMENT and those activities that may be specifically excluded. 46. The selection of R/W personnel and WORK within the completed PROJECT's SHS right-of- way will be performed in accordance with federal and California laws and regulations, and CALTRANS' policies, procedures, standards, practices, and applicable agreements. 47. RCTC will make all necessary arrangements with utility owners for the timely accommodation, protection, relocation, or removal of any existing utility facilities that conflict with construction of the PROJECT or that violate CALTRANS' encroachment policy. 48. RCTC will provide CALTRANS a copy of conflict maps, Relocation Plans, proposed Notices to Owner, Reports of Investigation, and Utility Agreements (if applicable) for CALTRANS' concurrence prior to issuing the Notices to Owner and executing the Utility Agreement. All utility conflicts will be fully addressed prior to Right of Way Certification and all arrangements for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities will be completed prior to construction contract award and included in the PROJECT plans, specifications, and estimate. 49. RCTC will determine the cost to positively identify and locate, protect, relocate, or remove any utility facilities whether inside or outside SHS right-of-way in accordance with federal and California laws and regulations, and CALTRANS' policies, procedures, standards, practices, and applicable agreements including but not limited to Freeway Master Contracts. 50. RCTC will provide a land surveyor licensed in the State of California to be responsible for surveying and right-of-way engineering. All survey and right-of-way engineering documents will bear the professional seal, certificate number, registration classification, expiration date of certificate, and signature of the responsible surveyor. 51. RCTC will utilize a public agency currently qualified by CALTRANS or a properly licensed consultant for all right-of-way activities. A qualified right-of-way agent will administer all right-of-way consultant contracts. RCTC will submit a draft Right of Way Certification document to CALTRANS six weeks prior to the scheduled Right of Way Certification milestone date for review. RCTC will submit a final Right of Way certification document to CALTRANS for approval prior to the PROJECT Ready -to -List advertisement. PACT Project Development Agreement2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 8 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 52. Physical and legal possession of right-of-way must be completed prior to Ready to List construction advertisement, unless PARTNERS mutually agree to other arrangements in writing. Right of way conveyances must be completed prior to OBLIGATION COMPLETION, unless RCTC mutually agree to other arrangements in writing. 53. RCTC agrees to first acquire any necessary rights -of -way in its own name. Prior to the closeout of this AGREEMENT, RCTC shall transfer title to said rights -of -way, free and clear of all encumbrances and liens, to the State. CALTRANS' acceptance of right-of-way title is subject to review of an Updated Preliminary Title Report provided by RCTC verfring that the title is free of all encumbrances and liens. Upon acceptance, PARTNER NAME will provide CALTRANS with a Policy of Title Insurance in CALTRANS' name. 54. RCTC certifies that it is authorized to hear and, if appropriate, issue Resolutions of Necessity for the PROJECT. RCTC agrees to be responsible for hearing and adopting Resolutions of Necessity for the PROJECT. RCTC is responsible for all workassociated with hearing and adopting Resolutions of Necessity. RCTC is responsible for conducting and documenting the functional equivalent of the CALTRANS District Condemnation Evaluation Meeting and the CALTRANS Condemnation Panel Review Meetings. CALTRANS Right of Way staff will be included on any functional equivalent of a Condemnation Panel Review Meeting. CALTRANS' concurrence is required, in advance, for any exception to CALTRANS' or FHWA's right-of- way policies, procedures, or standards. Schedule 55. PARTNERS will manage the schedule for OBLIGATIONS through the work plan included in the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN. Additional Provisions 56. PARTNERS will perform all OBLIGATIONS in accordance with federal and California laws, regulations, and standards; FHWA STANDARDS; and CALTRANS STANDARDS. 57. CALTRANS retains the right to reject noncompliant WORK, protect public safety, preserve property rights, and ensure that all WORK is in the best interest of the SHS. 58. Each PARTNER will ensure that personnel participating in OBLIGATIONS are appropriately qualified or licensed to perform the tasks assigned to them. 59. PARTNERS will invite each other to participate in the selection of any consultants who participate in OBLIGATIONS. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 61. The IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for a PROJECT COMPONENT will coordinate, prepare, obtain, implement, renew, and amend any encroachment permits needed to complete the PROJECT COMPONENT WORK. 62. If any PARTNER discovers unanticipated cultural, archaeological, paleontological, or other protected resources during WORK, all WORK in that area will stop and that PARTNER will notify all PARTNERS within twenty-four (24) hours of discovery. WORK may only resume after a qualified professional has evaluated the nature and significance of the discovery and a plan is approved for its removal or protection. 63. PARTNERS will hold all administrative drafts and administrative final reports, studies, materials, and documentation relied upon, produced, created, or utilized for the PROJECT in confidence to the extent permitted by law and where applicable, the provisions of California Government Code section 6254.5(e) shall protect the confidentiality of such documents in the event that said documents are shared between PARTNERS. PARTNERS will not distribute, release, or share said documents with anyone other than employees, agents, and consultants who require access to complete the PROJECT without the written consent of the PARTNER authorized to release them, unless required or authorized to do so by law. 64. If a PARTNER receives a public records request pertaining to OBLIGATIONS, that PARTNER will notify PARTNERS within five (5) working days of receipt and make PARTNERS aware of any disclosed public documents. PARTNERS will consult with each other prior to the release of any public documents related to the PROJECT. 65. If HM-1 or HM-2 is found during a PROJECT COMPONENT, the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for that PROJECT COMPONENT will immediately notify PARTNERS. 66. CALTRANS, independent of the PROJECT, is responsible for any HM-1 found within the existing SHS right-of-way. CALTRANS will undertake, or cause to be undertaken, HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-1 with minimum impact to the PROJECT schedule. The cost for HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-1 found within the existing SHS right-of-way is not an OBLIGATIONS COST and CALTRANS will pay, or cause to be paid, all costs for HM-1 ACTIVITIES. 67. If HM-1 is found within the PROJECT limits and outside the existing SHS right-of-way, responsibility for such HM-1 rests with the owner(s) of the parcel(s) on which the HM-1 is found. RCTC, in concert with the local agency having land use jurisdiction over the parcel(s), will ensure that HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-1 are undertaken with minimum impact to PROJECT schedule. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crc 69 ted 03/23/15) 10 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 The costs for HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-1 found within the PROJECT limits and outside the existing SHS right-of-way are not an OBLIGATIONS COST and will be the responsibility of the owner(s) of the parcel(s) where the HM-1 is located. 68. If HM-2 is found within the PROJECT limits, the public agency responsible for the advertisement, award, and administration (AAA) of the PROJECT construction contract will be responsible for HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-2. 69. CALTRANS' acquisition or acceptance of title to any property on which any HM-1 or HM-2 is found will proceed in accordance with CALTRANS' policy on such acquisition. 70. The IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for each PROJECT COMPONENT will furnish PARTNERS with written quarterly progress reports during the implementation of OBLIGATIONS in that component. 71. Any PARTNER that is responsible for completing OBLIGATIONS will accept, reject, compromise, settle, or litigate claims arising from those OBLIGATIONS. 72. PARTNERS will confer on any claim that may affect OBLIGATIONS or PARTNERS' liability or responsibility under this AGREEMENT in order to retain resolution possibilities for potential future claims. No PARTNER will prejudice the rights of another PARTNER until after PARTNERS confer on the claim. 73. If FUNDING PARTNERS fund any part of OBLIGATIONS with state or federal funds, each PARTNER will comply, and will ensure that any party hired to participate in OBLIGATIONS will comply with the federal cost principles of 2 CFR, Part 225, and administrative requirements outlined in 49 CFR, Part 18. These principles and requirements apply to all funding types included in this AGREEMENT. 74. PARTNERS will maintain, and will ensure that any party hired by PARTNERS to participate in OBLIGATIONS will maintain, a financial management system that conforms to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and that can properly accumulate and segregate incurred PROJECT costs and billings. 75. PARTNERS will maintain and make available to each other all OBLIGATIONS -related documents, including financial data, during the term of this AGREEMENT. PARTNERS will retain all OBLIGATIONS -related records for three (3) years after the final voucher. 76. PARTNERS have the right to audit each other in accordance with generally accepted governmental audit standards. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 11 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 CALTRANS, the state auditor, FHWA (if the PROJECT utilizes federal funds), and RCTC will have access to all OBLIGATIONS -related records of each PARTNER, and any party hired by a PARTNER to participate in OBLIGATIONS, for audit, examination, excerpt, or transcription. The examination of any records will take place in the offices and locations where said records are generated and/or stored and will be accomplished during reasonable hours of operation. The auditing PARTNER will be permitted to make copies of any OBLIGATIONS -related records needed for the audit. The audited PARTNER will review the draft audit, findings, and recommendations, and provide written comments within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt. Upon completion of the final audit, PARTNERS have thirty (30) calendar days to refund or invoice as necessary in order to satisfy the obligation of the audit. Any audit dispute not resolved by PARTNERS is subject to mediation. Mediation will follow the process described in the General Conditions section of this AGREEMENT. 77. If FUNDING PARTNERS fund any part of the PROJECT with state or federal funds, each FUNDING PARTNER will undergo an annual audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act and the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133. 78. If the PROJECT expends federal funds, any PARTNER that hires an A&E consultant to perform WORK on any part of the PROJECT will ensure that the procurement of the consultant and the consultant overhead costs are in accordance with Chapter 10 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 79. If WORK stops for any reason, IMPLEMENTING AGENCY will place the PROJECT right- of-way in a safe and operable condition acceptable to CALTRANS. 80. If WORK stops for any reason, each PARTNER will continue to implement all of its applicable commitments and conditions included in the PROJECT environmental documentation, permits, agreements, or approvals that are in effect at the time that WORK stops, as they apply to each PARTNER's responsibilities in this AGREEMENT, in order to keep the PROJECT in environmental compliance until WORK resumes. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 12 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 81. If FUNDING PARTNERS fund OBLIGATIONS with Proposition 1B Bond funds, PARTNERS will meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 8879.20 et al. (Proposition 1 legislation), the governor's Executive Order 2007-S-02-07, and the California Transportation Commission (CTC) program guidelines for the applicable account. Right of way purchased using Proposition 1B Bond funds will become the property of CALTRANS, and any revenue from the sale of excess lands originally purchased with bond funds will revert to CALTRANS. 82. CALTRANS will administer any federal subvention funds shown in the FUNDING SUMMARY table. 83. The cost of awards, judgments, or settlements generated by OBLIGATIONS is an OBLIGATIONS COST. 84. The cost of legal challenges to the environmental process or documentation is an OBLIGATIONS COSTS. 85. Fines, interest, or penalties levied against a PARTNER are not an OBLIGATIONS COST and will be paid, independent of OBLIGATIONS COST, by the PARTNER whose action or lack of action caused the levy. 86. The cost of any engineering support performed by CALTRANS includes all direct and applicable indirect costs. CALTRANS calculates indirect costs based solely on the type of funds used to pay support costs. State and federal funds administered by CALTRANS are subject to the current Program Functional Rate. All other funds are subject to the current Program Functional Rate and the current Administration Rate. The Program Functional Rate and Administration Rate are adjusted periodically. 87. Travel, per diem, and third -party contract reimbursements are an OBLIGATIONS COST only after those hired by PARTNERS to participate in OBLIGATIONS incur and pay those costs. Payments for travel and per diem will not exceed the rates paid rank and file state employees under current California Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules current at the effective date of this AGREEMENT. If RCTC invoices for rates in excess of DPA rates, RCTC will fund the cost difference and reimburse CALTRANS for any overpayment. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 13 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 88. If there are insufficient funds available in this AGREEMENT to place PROJECT right-of-way in a safe and operable condition, the appropriate IMPLEMENTING AGENCY will fund these activities until such time as PARTNERS amend this AGREEMENT. That IMPLEMENTING AGENCY may request reimbursement for these costs during the amendment process. 89. If there are insufficient funds in this AGREEMENT to implement applicable commitments and conditions included in the PROJECT environmental documentation, permits, agreements, and/or approvals that are in effect at a time that WORK stops, each PARTNER accepts responsibility to fund their respective OBLIGATIONS until such time as PARTNERS amend this AGREEMENT. Each PARTNER may request reimbursement for these costs during the amendment process. 90. RCTC will furnish CALTRANS with the Project History Files related to the PROJECT facilities on SHS within sixty (60) days following the completion of each PROJECT COMPONENT. RCTC will prepare the Project History File in accordance with the Project Development Procedures Manual, Chapter 7. All material will be submitted neatly in a three- ring binder and on a CD ROM in PDF format. GENERAL CONDITIONS 91. PARTNERS understand that this AGREEMENT is in accordance with and governed by the Constitution and laws of the State of California. This AGREEMENT will be enforceable in the State of California. Any PARTNER initiating legal action arising from this AGREEMENT will file and maintain that legal action in the Superior Court of the county in which the CALTRANS district office that is signatory to this AGREEMENT resides, or in the Superior Court of the county in which the PROJECT is physically located. 92. All CALTRANS' OBLIGATIONS under this AGREEMENT are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature, the State Budget Act authority, and the allocation of funds by the California Transportation Commission. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 14 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 93. Neither RCTC nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CALTRANS, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction conferred upon CALTRANS under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that CALTRANS, to the extent permitted by law, will defend, indemnify, and save harmless RCTC and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought forth under, but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation, or other theories and assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CALTRANS, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under this AGREEMENT. 94. Neither CALTRANS nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage, or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by RCTC, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction conferred upon RCTC under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that RCTC, to the extent permitted by law, will defend, indemnify, and save harmless CALTRANS and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought forth under, but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation, or other theories and assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by RCTC, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under this AGREEMENT. 95. PARTNERS do not intend this AGREEMENT to create a third party beneficiary or define duties, obligations, or rights in parties not signatory to this AGREEMENT. PARTNERS do not intend this AGREEMENT to affect their legal liability by imposing any standard of care for fulfilling OBLIGATIONS different from the standards imposed by law. 96. PARTNERS will not assign or attempt to assign OBLIGATIONS to parties not signatory to this AGREEMENT without an amendment to this AGREEMENT. 97. RCTC will not interpret any ambiguity contained in this AGREEMENT against CALTRANS. RCTC waives the provisions of California Civil Code section 1654. A waiver of a PARTNER's performance under this AGREEMENT will not constitute a continuous waiver of any other provision. 98. A delay or omission to exercise a right or power due to a default does not negate the use of that right or power in the future when deemed necessary. 99. If any PARTNER defaults in its OBLIGATIONS, a non -defaulting PARTNER will request in writing that the default be remedied within thirty (30) calendar days. If the defaulting PARTNER fails to do so, the non -defaulting PARTNER may initiate dispute resolution. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 15 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 100. PARTNERS will first attempt to resolve AGREEMENT disputes at the PROJECT team level. If they cannot resolve the dispute themselves, the CALTRANS district director and the executive officer of RCTC will attempt to negotiate a resolution. If PARTNERS do not reach a resolution, PARTNERS' legal counsel will initiate mediation. PARTNERS agree to participate in mediation in good faith and will share equally in its costs. Neither the dispute nor the mediation process relieves PARTNERS from full and timely performance of OBLIGATIONS in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. However, if any PARTNER stops fulfilling OBLIGATIONS, any other PARTNER may seek equitable relief to ensure that OBLIGATIONS continue. Except for equitable relief, no PARTNER may file a civil complaint until after mediation, or forty-five (45) calendar days after filing the written mediation request, whichever occurs first. PARTNERS will file any civil complaints in the Superior Court of the county in which the CALTRANS district office signatory to this AGREEMENT resides or in the Superior Court of the county in which the PROJECT is physically located. The prevailing PARTNER will be entitled to an award of all costs, fees, and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees as a result of litigating a dispute under this AGREEMENT or to enforce the provisions of this article including equitable relief. 101. PARTNERS maintain the ability to pursue alternative or additional dispute remedies if a previously selected remedy does not achieve resolution. 102. If any provisions in this AGREEMENT are found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be, or are in fact, illegal, inoperative, or unenforceable, those provisions do not render any or all other AGREEMENT provisions invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable, and those provisions will be automatically severed from this AGREEMENT. 103. If during performance of WORK additional activities or environmental documentation is necessary to keep the PROJECT in environmental compliance, PARTNERS will amend this AGREEMENT to include completion of those additional tasks. 104. Except as otherwise provided in the AGREEMENT, PARTNERS will execute a formal written amendment if there are any changes to OBLIGATIONS. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crew ed 03/23/15) 16 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 105. When WORK performed on the PROJECT is done under contract and falls within the Labor Code section 1720(a)(1) definition of "public works" in that it is construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair; or maintenance work under Labor Code section 1771, PARTNERS shall conform to the provisions of Labor Code sections 1720 through 1815, and all applicable provisions of California Code of Regulations found in Title 8, Division 1, Chapter 8, Subchapter 3, Articles 1-7. PARTNERS shall include prevailing wage requirements in contracts for public work and require contractors to include the same prevailing wage requirements in all subcontracts. Work performed by a PARTNER's own employees is exempt from the Labor Code's Prevailing Wage requirements. 106. If WORK is paid for, in whole or part, with federal funds and is of the type of work subject to federal prevailing wage requirements, PARTNERS shall conform to the provisions of the Davis -Bacon and Related Acts, 40 U.S.C. § 276(a). When applicable, PARTNERS shall include federal prevailing wage requirements in contracts for public work. WORK performed by a PARTNER's employees is exempt from federal prevailing wage requirements. 107. PARTNERS agree to sign a CLOSURE STATEMENT to terminate this AGREEMENT. However, all indemnification, document retention, audit, claims, environmental commitment, legal challenge, maintenance and ownership articles will remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement or expire by the statute of limitations. 108. PARTNERS intend this AGREEMENT to be their final expression that supersedes any oral understanding or writings pertaining to the OBLIGATIONS. The requirements of this agreement shall preside over any conflicting requirements in any documents that are made an express part of this AGREEMENT. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 17 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 DEFINITIONS AGREEMENT — This agreement including any attachments, exhibits, and amendments. CALTRANS STANDARDS — CALTRANS policies and procedures, including, but not limited to, the guidance provided in the Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM) and the CALTRANS Workplan Standards Guide for the Delivery of Capital Projects (WSG) [which contains the CALTRANS Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and was previously known as the WBS Guide] and is available at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/projmgmt/guidance.htm. CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) — The act (California Public Resources Code, sections 21000 et seq.) that requires state and local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those significant impacts, if feasible. CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) — The general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the federal government. CLOSURE STATEMENT — A document signed by PARTNERS that verifies the completion of all OBLIGATIONS included in this AGREEMENT and in all amendments to this AGREEMENT. EDQC (Environmental Document Quality Control) - CALTRANS quality control and quality assurance procedures for all environmental documents as described in the Jay Norvell Memos dated October 1, 2012 (available at http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/memos.htm#LinkTarget_705). This also includes the independent judgment analysis and determination under CEQA that the environmental documentation meets CEQA requirements. FHWA — Federal Highway Administration. FHWA STANDARDS — FHWA regulations, policies and procedures, including, but not limited to, the guidance provided at www.fhwa.dot.gov/topics.htm. FUNDING PARTNER — A PARTNER, designated in the FUNDING SUMMARY, that commits a defined dollar amount to fulfill OBLIGATIONS. Each FUNDING PARTNER accepts responsibility to provide the funds it commits in this AGREEMENT. FUNDING SUMMARY — An executed document that names FUNDING PARTNER(S), includes a FUNDING TABLE, SPENDING SUMMARY, deposit amounts, and invoicing and payment methods. FUNDING TABLE — The table that designates funding sources, types of funds, and the PROJECT COMPONENT in which the funds are to be spent. Funds listed on the FUNDING TABLE are "not -to -exceed" amounts for each FUNDING PARTNER. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 18 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) — Uniform minimum standards and guidelines for financial accounting and reporting issued by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board that serve to achieve some level of standardization. See http ://www.fasab.gov/accepted.html. HM-1 — Hazardous material (including, but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law whether it is disturbed by the PROJECT or not. HM-2 — Hazardous material (including, but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law only if disturbed by the PROJECT. HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES — Management activities related to either HM-1 or HM-2 including, without limitation, any necessary manifest requirements and disposal facility designations. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY — The PARTNER responsible for managing the scope, cost, and schedule of a PROJECT COMPONENT to ensure the completion of that component. IQA (Independent Quality Assurance) — CALTRANS' efforts to ensure that another PARTNER's quality assurance activities are in accordance with the applicable standards and the PROJECT's Quality Management Plan (QMP). When CALTRANS performs Independent Quality Assurance it does not develop, produce, validate, verify, re -check, or quality control another PARTNER's work products. NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) — This federal act establishes a national policy for the environment and a process to disclose the adverse impacts of projects with a federal nexus. OBLIGATIONS — All WORK responsibilities and their associated costs. OBLIGATION COMPLETION — PARTNERS have fulfilled all OBLIGATIONS included in this AGREEMENT and have signed a COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT. OBLIGATIONS COST(S) — The cost(s) to complete the responsibilities assigned in this AGREEMENT. Costs that are specifically excluded in this AGREEMENT or that are not incurred in the performance of the responsibilities in this AGREEMENT are not OBLIGATIONS COSTS. OBLIGATIONS COSTS are to be paid from the funds shown in the FUNDING SUMMARY. Costs that are not OBLIGATIONS COSTS are to be paid by the party that incurs the cost from funds that are outside the scope of this AGREEMENT. PA&ED (Project Approval and Environmental Document) — See PROJECT COMPONENT PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 19 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 PARTNER — Any individual signatory party to this AGREEMENT. PARTNERS — The term that collectively references all of the signatory agencies to this AGREEMENT. This term only describes the relationship between these agencies to work together to achieve a mutually beneficial goal. It is not used in the traditional legal sense in which one PARTNER's individual actions legally bind the other PARTNER. PROJECT COMPONENT — A distinct portion of the planning and project development process of a capital project as outlined in California Government Code, section 14529(b). • PID (Project Initiation Document) — The work required to deliver the project initiation document for the PROJECT in accordance with CALTRANS STANDARDS. • PA&ED (Project Approval and Environmental Document) — The work required to deliver the project approval and environmental documentation for the PROJECT in accordance with CALTRANS STANDARDS. • PS&E (Plans, Specifications, and Estimate) — The work required to deliver the plans, specifications, and estimate for the PROJECT in accordance with CALTRANS STANDARDS. • R/W (Right of Way) —The project components for the purpose of acquiring real property interests for the PROJECT in accordance with CALTRANS STANDARDS. • R/W (Right of Way) SUPPORT —The work required to obtain all property interests for the PROJECT. • R/W (Right of Way) CAPITAL — The funds for acquisition of property rights for the PROJECT. • CONSTRUCTION — The project components for the purpose of completing the construction of the PROJECT in accordance with CALTRANS STANDARDS. • CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT — The work required for the administration, acceptance, and final documentation of the construction contract for the PROJECT. • CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL — The funds for the construction contract. PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN — A group of documents used to guide the PROJECT's execution and control throughout that project's lifecycle. PS&E (Plans, Specifications, and Estimate) — See PROJECT COMPONENT. QMP (Quality Management Plan) — An integral part of the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN that describes IMPLEMENTING AGENCY'S quality policy and how it will be used. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crca % 03/23/15) 20 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 R/W (Right of Way) CAPITAL — See PROJECT COMPONENT. R/W (Right of Way) SUPPORT — See PROJECT COMPONENT. SHS (State Highway System) — All highways, right-of-way, and related facilities acquired, laid out, constructed, improved, or maintained as a state highway pursuant to constitutional or legislative authorization. SPENDING SUMMARY — A table that identifies the funds available for expenditure by each PARTNER. The table shows the maximum reimbursable expenditure for each PARTNER in each PROJECT COMPONENT. SPONSOR — Any PARTNER that accepts the responsibility to establish scope of the PROJECT and the obligation to secure financial resources to fund the PROJECT COMPONENTS in this AGREEMENT. A SPONSOR is responsible for adjusting the PROJECT scope to match committed funds or securing additional funds to fully fund the PROJECT COMPONENTS in this AGREEMENT. If this AGREEMENT has more than one SPONSOR, funding adjustments will be made by percentage (as outlined in Responsibilities). Scope adjustments must be developed through the project development process and must be approved by CALTRANS as the owner/operator of the SHS. WORK — All efforts to complete the OBLIGATIONS included in this AGREEMENT as described by the activities in the CALTRANS Workplan Standards Guide for the Delivery of Capital Projects (WSG). PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Cr1ac0d 03/23/15) 21 AGREEMENT 08-1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 SIGNATURES PARTNERS are empowered by California Streets and Highways Code Section 114 & 130 to enter into this AGREEMENT and have delegated to the undersigned the authority to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of the respective agencies and covenants to have followed all the necessary legal requirements to validly execute this AGREEMENT. Signatories may execute this AGREEMENT through individual signature pages provided that each signature is an original. This AGREEMENT is not fully executed until all original signatures are attached. CALTRANS John Bulinski Interim District 8 Director Certified as to funds: Lisa Pacheco Budget Manager RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Anne Mayer Executive Director Approved as to form and procedure: Best, Best And Krieger Legal Counsel PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Crca�cd 03/23/15) 22 AGREEMENT 08 - 1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 EA ON69U 08-RIV-60-22.1/26.5 FUNDING SUMMARY NO.01 FUNDING TABLE Source FUNDING PARTNER IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 4 CALTRANS RCTC Totals Fund Type PE** (PA&ED, PS&E) R/W SUPPORT R/W CAPITAL Local RCTC Measure A $0 $0 $550,000 $947,000 $1,497,000 State CALTRANS SHOPP * $3,500,000 $0 $0 $3,500,000 State RCTC STIP/RIP * I $0 $0 $550,000 $550,000 Federal RCTC 2005 Section 117 STP (HR 4818)* $491,964 $0 $0 $491,964 Federal RCTC 2006 Section 112* $990,000 $0 $0 $990,000 Federal RCTC 2006 Section 112* $990,000 $0 $0 $990,000 Federal RCTC 2006 Section 112* $565,796 $0 $0 $565,796 Federal RCTC CMAQ * $7,000,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000 Totals $13,537,760 $550,000 $1,497,000 $15,584,760 * Funds listed on the FUNDING TABLE are "not -to -exceed" amounts for each FUNDING PARTNER. ** Preliminary Engineering (PE) includes PA&ED and PS&E phases of work. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 182 1 FUNDING SUMMARY No. 01 AGREEMENT 08 - 1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 SPENDING SUMMARY v 2221 PE (PA&ED AND PS&E) R/W Support R/W CAPITAL Fund Type CALTRANS RCTC CALTRANS RCTC CALTRANS RCTC Totals Local Funds Measure A $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 $947,000 $1,497,000 State Funds SHOPP $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 STIP/RIP $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $550,000 Federal Funds 2005 Section 117 STP (HR 4818) $491,964 $0 $0 $0 $0 $491,964 2006 Section 112 $990,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $990,000 2006 Section 112 $990,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $990,000 2006 Section 112 $565,796 $0 $0 $0 $0 $565,796 CMAQ $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 Totals $13,537,760 $0 $0 $550,000 "I $1,497,000 $15,584,760 PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 183 2 Funding 1. In accordance with the Caltrans Federal -Aid Project Funding Guidelines, PARTNERS must obtain approval from the Federal Highway Administration prior to any PROJECT funding changes that that will change the federal share of funds. Invoicing and Payment 2. PARTNERS will invoice for funds where the SPENDING SUMMARY shows that one PARTNER provides funds for use by another PARTNER. PARTNERS will pay invoices within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt of invoice when not paying with Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT). When paying with EFT, RCTC will pay invoices within five (5) calendar days of receipt of invoice. 3. If RCTC has received EFT certification from CALTRANS then RCTC will use the EFT mechanism and follow all EFT procedures to pay all invoices issued from CALTRANS. 4. When a PARTNER is reimbursed for actual costs, invoices will be submitted each month for the prior month's expenditures. After all PROJECT COMPONENT WORK is complete, PARTNERS will submit a final accounting of all PROJECT COMPONENT costs. Based on the final accounting, PARTNERS will invoice and then refund or pay as necessary in order to satisfy the financial commitments of this AGREEMENT. 5. If an executed Program Supplement Agreement (PSA) or STIP Planning, Programming, and Monitoring Program Fund Transfer Agreement (PPM) exists for this PROJECT then RCTC will abide by the billing and payment conditions detailed for the fund types identified in the PSA or PPM. 6. If CALTRANS reimburses RCTC for any costs later determined to be unallowable, RCTC will reimburse those funds. Preliminary Engineering (PE)) -Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&F,D) and Plans, specifications, and Estimate (PS&F,). 7. No invoicing or reimbursement will occur for the PA&ED and PS&E PROJECT COMPONENT, together referred to as PE in this agreement, instead CALTRANS will draw from the state and/or federal funds shown in the FUNDING SUMMARY table for these PROJECT COMPONENTs. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 3 184 FUNDING SUMMARY No. 01 AGREEMENT 08 - 1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 Right of Way Support (R/W SUPPORT) 8. RCTC will invoice and CALTRANS will reimburse for actual costs. Right of Way Capital (R/W CAPITAL) 9. RCTC will invoice and CALTRANS will reimburse for the accepted offer price of parcels. PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 4 185 FUNDING SUMMARY No. 01 AGREEMENT 08 - 1543 A/3 Project No. 0812000307 Signatures PARTNERS are empowered by California Streets and Highways Code Section 114 & 130 to enter into this AGREEMENT and have delegated to the undersigned the authority to execute this FUNDING SUMMARY on behalf of the respective agencies and covenants to have followed all the necessary legal requirements to validly execute this FUNDING SUMMARY. Signatories may execute this FUNDING SUMMARY through individual signature pages provided that each signature is an original. This FUNDING SUMMARY is not fully executed until all original signatures are attached. CALTRANS John Bulinski Interim District 8 Director Date District Budget Manager HQ Accounting RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Arne Mayer Executive Director Date PACT Project Development Agreement 2015-03-12 (Created 03/23/15) 5 186 AGENDA ITEM 8J RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Edda Rosso, Capital Projects Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement with HDR Engineering Inc. for Construction Management Services for the Perris Valley Line Project STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 10-31-058-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 10-31-058-00, with HDR Engineering Inc. (HDR) to provide construction management for the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project in the amount of $4.7 million, plus a contingency amount of $500,000, for an additional amount of $5.2 million, and a total amount not to exceed $22,750,146; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee, pursuant to legal counsel review, to approve the use of the contingency as may be required for the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its July 14, 2010 meeting, the Commission approved the selection process and awarded Agreement No. 10-31-058-00 to HDR to provide construction management services for the PVL project for the amount of $15,950,146, plus contingency of $1.6 million, for a total amount not to exceed $17,550,146. At that time, it was anticipated the project would be advertised for construction in early 2011. Due to the extension of the environmental process as a result of California Environmental Quality Act litigation, the actual start of construction did not occur until October 2013. In June 2013, Agreement No. 10-31-058-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 10-31-058-00, was executed to extend the term of the agreement to the date that is six months after issuance of a notice of final acceptance or December 31, 2016, whichever occurs earlier. There was no cost impact related to this amendment. In August 2014, Agreement No. 10-31-058-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 10-31-058-00, was executed to add consultant and subconsultant classifications and ranges. There was no cost impact related to this amendment. Agenda Item 8J 187 During the extended pre -construction phase, HDR assisted the Commission with constructability reviews; provided support during the litigation; developed and maintained a master schedule for the project; performed a cost risk assessment review of the project to develop the risk register; performed ongoing reviews of estimates, final specifications, and plans and the bid award process. Additional tasks also included completing the Project Procedures Manual, Quality Assurance Manual, and responses to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). DISCUSSION: During the past five years, HDR provided construction management services related to the development of bid packages for the invitation for bids issued in October 2012, pre -construction activities, and active construction management of the Ames Construction contract. Additional construction management services were required during the pre -construction phase of the project due to the extension of the environmental process, and additional services will be required that were not envisioned in however are consistent with the original scope. Accordingly, staff requests approval of Amendment No. 3. The amendment is also necessary since it is likely the duration of construction will be longer than anticipated five years ago. HDR provided a detailed scope of work, cost, and schedule for proposed Amendment No. 3. The information provided was reviewed in detail by staff, and negotiations were held with HDR to obtain the best value for the proposed work. The cost for the proposed services is $4.7 million, plus a contingency of $500,000, for an additional amount of $5.2 million. Accordingly, the total amount not to exceed for the agreement is $22,750,146. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2015/16 Amount: $5,200,000 Local Agency Reimbursements, Measure A, Source of Funds: Federal Transit Administration, Congestion Budget Adjustment: No Mitigation Air Quality, Surface Transportation Program 003800 81302 221 33 81301 $ 126,675 003823 81302 221 33 81301 $ 5,020,000 003827 81302 221 33 81301 $ 8,550 GL/Project 003829 81302 221 33 81301 $ 7,725 003830 81302 221 33 81301 $ 5,025 Accounting Nos.: 003831 81302 221 33 81301 $ 5,475 003832 81302 221 33 81301 $ 9,375 003835 81302 221 33 81301 $ 9,675 003834 81302 221 33 81301 $ 7,500 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-liMAtai.� Date: 05/26/15 Attachment: Draft HDR Agreement No. 10-31-058-03 Agenda Item 8J 188 Agreement No. 10-31-058-03 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, MATERIALS TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES FOR THE PERRIS VALLEY LINE METROLINK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1 PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement for Construction Management, Materials Testing and Construction Surveying Services is made and entered into as of this day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") and HDR ENGINEERING, INC. ("Consultant"), a Nebraska corporation. 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an agreement dated September 8, 2010, for the purpose of providing construction management, materials testing and construction surveying services for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink Improvement Project (the "Master Agreement"). 2.2 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement, dated June 13, 2013, for the purpose of extending the term. 2.3 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 2 to the Master Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, for the purpose of including additional classifications. 2.4 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order to extend revise the Scope of Services and provide additional compensation to continue providing construction management, materials testing and construction surveying services for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink Improvement Project 3. TERMS 17336.00000\ 1514236.2 1 189 3.1 The Scope of Services for the Master Agreement shall be amended to include Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, required to provide additional construction management, materials testing and construction surveying services , as more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment shall be Six Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,300,000), as further set forth in Exhibit "C" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. Work shall be performed at the rates set forth in the Master Agreement. 3.3 The total not -to -exceed amount of the Master Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 3, shall be increased from Fifteen Million Seven Hundred Thirty -Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty -Two Dollars ($15,735,352) to Twenty -Two Million Thirty -Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty -Two Dollars ($22,035,352) 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1 and 2, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. 17336.00000\1514236.2 [Signatures on following page] 2 190 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 10-31-058-03 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY HDR ENGINEERING, INC. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Daryl R. Busch, Chair Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.00000\1514236.2 3 Name Title 191 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES [Attached behind this page] Exhibit A 17336.00000\1514236.2 hdrinc.com May 8, 2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Edda Rosso Project Manager Re: Contract Number 10-31-058-00 Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Request for Additional Funds Dear Edda: In review of the budget for the CM team for Perris Valley Line, as we have discussed, HDR is nearing the end of our budget allocation for the Project. Due to extension of the project and contractor's schedule and additional requirements (change in scope) for the CM team, we request additional funds for the continuation of our CM services, operations of the field office and to cover the former re -allocation of funds from the Post Construction phase to the Pre -Construction phase. Attached is the summary of trends that have increased the cost to the CM team efforts. They include: • Re -allocation of project funding from Post Construction Phase to Pre -Construction Phase • Re -allocation of project funding from Construction Phase to Pre -Construction Phase • Change in scope to add Office Space to the CM team requirements • Change in scope to add Native American Monitoring to the CM team requirements • Additional Survey services by sub -consultant DEA not originally included in their scope • Additional Quality Control and testing service for sub -consultant Leighton, not originally included in their scope • Added a Deputy Project Manager to the CM Team • A time extension due to the contractor's extended schedule, requiring continued CM Team efforts • A time extension due to a change in the critical path of the contractor's operations • A time extension at the end of the contract to provide for potential increase in closeout activities and advising RCTC on potential claims and change orders at the end of the project 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92602 T 714.730.2300 F 714.730.2301 193 These additions have a total additional cost of $6,284,157.78. This request is based on the original contract value of $15,735,352.00. There is also a contingency amount of $1,600,000 that should be considered when determining the total amount needed to complete the project. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in this matter. Sincerely, HDR CCC s Jon Rohrer, PE Perris Valley Line Project Director Concur: Edda Rosso, P.E. RCTC Project Manager Cc: Richard Bryan, RCTC/Bechtel Nisa Hester, RCTC/Bechtel Mark Milton, RCTC/Bechtel Leonard Beystrum, HDR CCC Sheren Chheng, HDR CCC 1.0 Amendment Overview RCTC approved a contract with HDR on July 14, 2010 to provide construction management services for the Perris Valley Line. At that time, it was anticipated that the project would be advertised for construction in early 2011. HDR was to provide assistance with constructability, pre -qualification of contractors, selection of contractors and bid evaluation. This would proceed to the construction phase where HDR would provide construction engineering inspection following on to testing and start up of the rail service then on to the post construction phase including closeout, coordination of turn over to the Commission and to final revenue operations. Due to extension of the environmental process including a lawsuit from the Friends of Riverside's Hills, the actual start of construction did not occur until October 2013. HDR requested re -allocation of contract dollars from the Post Construction Phase to the Pre - Construction Phase. During the extended pre -construction phase, HDR assisted RCTC with constructability, legal support during the lawsuit, developed and maintained a master schedule for the project, performed a cost risk assessment review of the project to develop the risk register, on going review of cost estimates, final specifications and plans and the bid award process. The additional tasks included completing the Project Procedures Manual, Quality Assurance Manual and responses to the PMOC. At this time RCTC determined it would be wise to move the office space requirement from the Contractor's scope of work to the CM scope of work. During the Construction Phase, the pace of work and difficulty indicated that we need additional management staff, so RCTC authorized the addition of a Deputy Project Manager to assist the project team and advise RCTC. Native American monitoring was also determined to be moved to HDR from RCTC/Bechtel. This is a requirement of the environmental process to monitor excavations for Native American artifacts. HDR provided the coordination and monitoring of this effort. During the Construction Phase, additional surveying was identified and DEA, sub -consultant, performed this out of scope work including additional quality assurance of the contractor's surveys, recording of the final as -built track geometry for final files, and additional surveying for discrepancies in the designer's survey plats. Additional materials testing was identified as well and performed by sub -consultant Leighton. This effort include the gamma gamma testing of piles and bridge asbestos testing for the demolition of an existing bridge over the San Jacinto River. Leighton's scope was also changed to include testing of exported soil prior to moving which resulted in a cost savings to the project. There have been delays to the project's original schedule due to the extension of the Contractor's efforts. This amounts to approximately 4 months duration of CM team work time. 195 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 1 7/11/2012 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 01 ($ were moved from POST -CON budget) $ 231,485.00 2 12/19/2012 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 02 ($ were moved from POST -CON budget) $ 250,000.00 3 2/28/2013 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 03 ($ were moved from POST -CON budget) $ 322,835.00 4 5/22/2013 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 04 ($ were moved from CONST budget) $ 770,000.00 5 7/22/2013 Office Space $ 648,711.49 6 11/20/2012 Native American Montoring - Email from Steve Keel destignating HDR as the contact for Pechanga & Soboba $ 193,467.25 7 7/3/2014 Additional Surveying by DEA - Received services request from DEA via email $ 219,877.17 8 12/19/2014 Additional QC services for Leighton $ 36,482.60 9 10/2/2014 Add Deputy PM (Oscar) $ 608,257.00 10 5/1/2015 Time extension due to delay and other extra works $ 2,103,947.93 11 5/5/2015 Ames changing their cirtical path $ 693,874.35 12 5/7/2015 Contingency for final close out delay caused by extension of contractor's schedule. $ 205,219.99 TOTAL FOR ALL TRENDS $ 6,284,157.78 196 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 1 7/11/2012 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 01 ($ were moved from POST -CON budget) $ 231,485.00 197 Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Engineering Change Notice Form Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 Item 01 7/11/2012 Description: Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request 7/11/2012. Task A - Extended duration of preconstruction activity for an additional 20 months. Support with Legal Assistance. Assist with CM Procedure Manual. Support Development of Agreements with SCRRA & BNSF. Support Bid Award Process. Task B - Review Schedule, Cost & Construction phasing and prepare master plan which requires additional effor over 27 months with added alternate staging and schedules. Additional cost risk analysis for technical experts analysis provided by HDR and subsconsultant. Task C - Construction Manager QA/QC plan required additional effort based on PMOC requests. Review 90% Cost Estimate and provide final detailed estimate at 100%. Estimate Assumptions: This allocation will extend our services through November 30,2012 for Pre -Construction Services. HDR CCC - Prime Amount Task A - Mangement/Coordination $ 298,726 Task B - Project Controls $ (2,995) Task C - Quality Assurance $ 19,262 Task D - Environmental $ (46,185) $ 268,808 Other Direct Costs Total ODC Total ODCs $ (37,323) Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 231,485 198 July 16, 2012 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Edda Rosso Project Manager Re: Dear Edda: Contract Number 10-31-058-00 Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request As noted in the weekly CM Coordination meetings, the start of construction for the PVL Project has incurred a series of delays since we began providing services to RCTC, moving from an NTP date in April 2011 to one in December 2012. We've discussed with you the potential for continuing delays to impact our total cost. Upon re -assessing the impacts of the delays to late 2012, HDR finds it necessary to request an amendment to increase the amount authorized by RCTC for our services during Phase 1, Preconstruction, of the Project. Below is a brief discussion of the additional task efforts that make up the amendment request. • Task A: o Task A01, Management & Coordination: Extended duration of preconstruction activity (additional 20 months) means additional coordination meetings, trend meetings, coordination with RCTC, designer, SCRRA and others o Task A02.01, Legal Assistance (RCTC Job 3834): Added Scope to support to RCTC legal o Task A03, CM Procedure Manual: Manual was postponed to the Construction Phase, resulting in a credit from the original budget o Task A06, Support Development of Agreements with SCRRA and BNSF: required additional meetings, draft MOUs, etc o Task A08, Support Bid Award Process: required additional effort for meetings, draft documents and legal review through several iterations • Task B o Task B03, Review Schedule, Cost & Construction Phasing and Prepare Master Schedule: requires additional effort over 27 months with added alternate staging schedules and updates to the schedule based on status of project factors such as environmental and design status o Task B04, Cost Risk Analysis: additional support provided by HDR, Simon Wong Engineering, Arcadis and Xorail as the technical experts for the analysis HDR Construction Control Corporation 2280 Market Street Suite 100 Riverside, CA 925D1 Phone (951) 320-7300 Fax (951) 320.7301 www.hdnnc.com Pagel of 2 199 " Task C o Task C01, Construction Manager QA/QC Plan: required additional effort based on PMOC requests o Task C04, Review 90% Cost Estimate and Provide Final Detailed Estimate@100%: required additional effort to break down the core and non core items, and reconcile the STV versus HDR cost estimates and breakdowns For the CM Tasks and subtasks not discussed above, there was either little or no increase to the expected work effort or there was a reduction of effort. HDR reviewed all subtasks and adjusted task costs based on our understanding of the work yet to be completed and the discussions we have had with ROTC. The resulting net effect is a request for additional funds for HDR's contract based on adjustment of all subtasks both up and down. HDR is requesting a reallocation of $231,485 against the $804,320 that is allocated to the Post - Construction activity. Based on our forecasted effort, this allocation will extend our services through November 30, 2012 for Pre -Construction Services, leaving the remaining $572,835 for Post -Construction activity. We would like to point out that $182,421, or approximately 80% of the total increase, represents the net total of increased time -related costs for Subtask A01 and the deleted costs for Subtask A04. Another $33,746 is proposed as an allowance for the added scope of work to provide support to ROTC legal staff. The remaining $15,318 of the requested increase represents the net result of our assessment of all other subtasks to be performed. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in this matter. Sincerely, HDR CCC l Jon Rohrer, PE Perris Valley Line Project Advisor Concur: Cc: Richard Bryan, RCTC/Bechtel Nisa Hester, RCTC/Bechtel Ben Beasley, RCTC/Bechtel Edda Rosso, P.E. RCTC Project Manager Leonard Beystrum, HDR CCC Sheren Chheng, HDR CCC Attachment "A" - Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Table I-1DR Construction Control Corporation 2280 Market Street Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone (951} 320-7300 Fax (951) 320-7301 www.hdrinc.com Page 2 of 2 200 Attachment "A" - Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Table The table below summarizes proposed adjustments to the costs for preconstruction services through November 30, 2012. Task No. CM Task Description Cumulative Costs Estimated Costs Total Projected Costs Original Authorized Max Amount Proposed Adjustments Sep 8, 2010 thru Mar 31, 2012 Apr 1, 2012 thru Nov 30, 2012 Phase 1 Pre Construction Phase 1 FreConstructran (Projected - Authorized Maximum) A Management/Coordination $681,966 $517,364 $1,199,330 $900,604 $298,726 B Project Controls $247,902 $62,538 $310,440 $313,435 ($2,995) C quality Assurance $710,277 $121,769 $832,046 $812,784 $19,262 D Environmental $20,815 $50,614 $71,429 $117,614 ($46,185) ODCs Other Direct Costs $68,028 $58,632 $126,660 $163,983 ($37,323) Totals $1,728,988 $810,917 $2,539,905 $2,308,420 $231,485 201 Task No. CM Task Description Cumulative Costs Estimated Costs Total Projected Costs Authorized Max Amount Proposed Adjustments Sep 8, 2010 thru Mar 31, 2012 Apr 1, 2012 thru Nov 30, 2012 Phase 1 PreConstruction Phase 1 PreConstruction (Projected - Authorized Maximum) A Management/Coordination $681,966 $517,364 $1,199,330 $900,604 $298,726 B Project Controls $247,902 $62,538 $310,440 $313,435 ($2,995) C Quality Assurance $710,277 $121,769 $832,046 $812,784 $19,262 D Environmental $20,815 $50,614 $71,429 $117,614 ($46,185) ODCs Other Direct Costs $68,028 $58,632 $126,660 $163,983 ($37,323) Total Costs $1,728,988 $810,917 $2,539,905 $2,308,420 $231,485 cost variation without Subtask A02.01 = $197,739 over/under original 33% -1% 2% - 39 - 23 10.0% avg $/mo per orig budget orig budget avg $/mo extended to 27 mos $33,746 = addnl scope A02.01 for legal support $197,739 = cost variation without Subtask A02.01 $200,000 = max cost savings incentive Phase 1 (precon) per Agreement, Appendix C, Item 5, "Savings Bonus" $182,421 = net cost variation Subtask A01 + Subtask A04 versus $197K cost variation above without A02.01 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 2 12/19/2012 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 02 ($ were moved from POST -CON budget) $ 250,000.00 203 Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Engineering Change Notice Form Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: 10-31-058-00 Change No.: Item 02 Date Initiated: 12/19/2012 Description: Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request 12/19/2012. Task A - Extended duration of preconstruction activity. Attended the Safety and Security Committee meeting. Complete the Project Procedures Manual based on updated comments. Continue to support Bid Award Process. Task C - Additional comments for QA Manual. Additional work for plan and specification reviw and revision. ODC - Set up project office. Estimate Assumptions: This allocation will extend our services through January 30, 2013 for Pre -Construction Services. HDR CCC - Prime Amount Task A - Mangement/Coordination $ 200,000 Task B - Project Controls $ - Task C - Quality Assurance $ 25,000 Task D - Environmental $ - $ 225,000 Other Direct Costs Total ODC Total ODCs $ 25,000 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 250,000 204 ONE. COMPANY I ,1ldn ti,vl:rrv„r,• December 19, 2012 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Edda Rosso Project Manager Re: Contract Number 10-31-058-00 Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request Dear Edda: In review of the budget for the CM team for Perris Valley Line, it appears that the additional efforts to support the bid/award process have increased our costs past that originally anticipated when we requested a reallocation in July 2012. This additional effort includes the assistance in writing and reviewing specifications and plans as well as work with RCTC for the pre -qualification and invitation for bid processes. Additionally, as we move toward bid and award, there has been an increase in demands for our team members to attend coordination and trend meetings for the team. As we have discussed, the start of construction for the PVL Project has incurred a series of delays since we began providing services to RCTC, moving from an NTP date in April 2011 to one in January 2013. We've discussed with you the potential for continuing delays to impact our total cost. Upon re- assessing the impacts of the delays to late 2012, HDR finds it necessary to request another reallocation to increase the amount authorized by RCTC for our services during Phase 1, Preconstruction, of the Project. For our previous request, we adjusted several tasks up and down to arrive at the requested reallocation. This request is primarily driven by the following tasks: • Continue to support the Bid/Award process • Additional work for plan and specification review and revision • Delay of 30 days for the PCGA • Attendance at the Safety and Security Committee meetings • Additional comments for CtA Manual • Complete the Project Procedures Manual based on updated comments • Set up project office HDR is requesting a reallocation of $250,000 against the $572,835 that is allocated to the Post - Construction activity. Based on our forecasted effort, this allocation will extend our services through January 30, 2013 for Pre -Construction Services, leaving the remaining $322,835 for Post -Construction activity. This will result in an increase in the Pre -Construction Services budget from $2,539,906 to $2,789,906. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in this matter. HDR Construction Control Corporation 3230 LI Camino Real Suite 200 Irvine. CA 92602-1377 Phone: (714) 730-2300 Fax' 17141730-2391 www.hdrinc.com 205 Sincerely, HDR CCC Jon Rohrer, PE Perris Valley Line Project Director Concur: Cc: Richard Bryan, RCTC/Bechtel Nisa Hester, RCTC/Bechtel Ben Beasley, RCTC/Bechtel HDR Construction Control Corporation Edda Rosso, P.E. RCTC Project Manager Leonard Beystrum, HDR CCC 5heren Chheng, HDR CCC 3230 Ei Gaminn Real Suite 200 Irvine CA92607-1377 Rhone. (714)730.2300 FaK:i7141730.2301 www,hdrinc.torn 206 Perris Valley Line Invoice Tracking HDR CCC SWE Arcadis Arellano DEA Ghirardelli Gonzalez -White Greigo Leighton Xorail HDR Eng Fee Original Contract Amendments Issued Amount to Date $615,440.00 $562,531.00 $152,415.00 $56,239.00 $125,016.00 $21,161.00 $8,534.00 $59,632.00 $61,305.00 $198,578.00 $408,034.00 $39,537.00 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 Proposed Budget Adjustment perJune Agreement Total 2012 Evaluation $417,769.00 - $21,377.00 $72,825.00 $305.00 - $23,828.00 - $21,161.00 - $8,534.00 $37,291.00 $53,308.00 -$112,362.00 - $50,486.00 - $5,650.00 Proposed Revised $1,033,209.00 $541,154.00 $225,240.00 $56,544.00 $101,188.00 $0.00 $0.00 $96,923.00 $7,997.00 $86,216.00 $357,548.00 �33,887.00 Remaining Balance after November 2012 (Tenative) - $59,757.99 - $47,810.31 $15,352.64 $50,214.44 $0.26 $0.00 $0.00 - $23,738.66 $1,618.48 $11,302.72 $34,942.76 $33,887.00 Total $2,308,422.00 $338,100.00 $2,539,906.00 110950 100000 35000 4050 $16,011.34 250000 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 3 2/28/2013 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 03 ($ were moved from POST -CON budget) $ 322,835.00 208 Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Engineering Change Notice Form Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 Item 03 2/28/2013 Description: Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request 2/28/2013. Task A - Extended duration of preconstruction activity. Continue to support the legal process. Additional reponses to PMOC. Task C - Additional work for plan and specification review and revision. ODC - Set up project office. Delay funding of the SSGA. Estimate Assumptions: This allocation will extend our services through April 30, 2013 for Pre -Construction Services. HDR CCC - Prime Amount Task A - Mangement/Coordination $ 125,000 Task B - Project Controls $ - Task C - Quality Assurance $ 86,651 Task D - Environmental $ - $ 211,651 Other Direct Costs Total ODC Total ODCs $ 111,184 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 322,835 209 February 28, 2013 ONE COMPANY 11fan; Solution,. Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Edda Rosso Project Manager Re: Dear Edda: Contract Number 10-31-058-00 Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request In review of the budget for the CM team for Perris Valley Line, it appears that the additional efforts to review plans and specifications, assist bid evaluations and contract award, support RCTC's legal team and set up project office have increased our costs past that originally anticipated. As we have discussed, the start of construction for the PVL Project has incurred a series of delays since we began providing services to RCTC, moving from an NTP date in April 2011 to one in Spring 2013. We've discussed with you the potential for continuing delays to impact our total cost. Upon re- assessing the impacts of the delays to early 2013, HDR finds it necessary to request another reallocation to increase the amount authorized by RCTC for our services during Phase 1, Preconstruction, of the Project. For our previous request, we adjusted several tasks up and down to arrive at the requested reallocation. This request is primarily driven by the following tasks: • Continue to support the legal process • Additional work for plan and specification review and revision • Delay for the SSGA • Additional responses to PMOC • Set up project office HDR is requesting a reallocation of $322,835 to our Pre -Construction Phase service from the remaining $322,835 that is allocated to the Post -Construction tasks. Based on our forecasted effort, this allocation will extend our services through April 30, 2013 for Pre -Construction Services, leaving the remaining $0 for Post -Construction activity. This will result in an increase in the Pre -Construction Services budget from $2,789,906 to $3,112,741. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in this matter. HDR Construction Control Corporation 3230 El Camino Real Suite 200 Iwo. CA 92602-1377 Phone (7141730-2300 Fax W41730-2301 wmnv.hdrinc.com 210 Sincerely, HDR CCC Jon Rohrer, PE Perris Valley Line Project Director Cc: Richard Bryan, RCTC/Bechtel Nisa Hester, RCTC/Bechtel Ben Beasley, RCTC/Bechtel HDR Construction Control Corporation Edda Rosso, P.E. RCTC Project Manager Leonard Beystrum, HDR CCC Sheren Chheng, HDR CCC 3230 [I Camiuo Real Suite 20U Irvine, CA 92602-1377 Rune OKI730.2300 Fax 17141730.2301 www luirinc,enm 211 ADJUSTMENTS TO PVL INVOICE FOR FEBRUARY 2013 SERVICES 3/11/2013 FOR SERVICES FEBRUARY 1, 2013 thru APRIL 30, 2013 Subtask CCC SWE ARC ARELLANO DEA GHIR GONZ GRIEGO LEIGHTON XORAIL ENG SubFee TOTAL Labor $91,565 $92,000 $17,000 $8,000 $3,270 $211,835 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ODCs $111,000 $0 $111,000 Adjust 2/1/13 $202,565 $92,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $8,000 $3,270 $322,835 Remaining Budget1/31/13 $93 $1,235 $11,150 $24,950 $0 $0 $0 $13,632 $462 $10,529 $7,280 $1,191 $70,522 Rev Remaining Budget2/1/13 $202,658 $93,235 $11,150 $24,950 $0 $0 $0 $30,632 $462 $10,529 $15,280 $4,461 $393,357 Avg/Month = $30,553 $31,078 $3,717 $8,317 $0 $0 $0 $10,211 $154 $3,510 $5,093 $1,487 $94,119 +$111K +$111K office & office & Prolog Prolog Office Lease - first & last $22,667 assumed payment? Tentant Improvements $68,000 does not include any furniture, etc. ODCs Prolog Training $6,000 Prolog licenses, etc. (5) $14,517 TOTAL $111,184 from Kelar Pacific quotation to SWE for initial set up of licenses: 1) Prolog Manager - starting 3/1/13 - 311/14 Each 1 2,845.25 2,845.25 2) Prolog Converge - starting 4/1/13-3/1/14 Each 5 1,737.312 8,686.56 3) Activation Fee (One Time) 3/1/13 Each 1 995.00 995.00 4) Additional Storage 250GI31Per Year Each 2 995.00 1,990.00 1) Prolog Manager Consulting Services 3/1/13 z) Consulting Services - discount applied Hour 40 175.00 7,000.00 Hour -40 25.00-1,000.00 «<transfer from Post Const Phase 2.1.13 should be $322,835 $0 212 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 4 5/22/2013 Pre -Con Phase Budget Adjustment Request No. 04 ($ were moved from CONST budget) $ 770,000.00 213 Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Engineering Change Notice Form Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 Item 04 5/22/2013 Description: Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request 5/22/2013. Task A - Extended duration of preconstruction activity. Continue to support the legal process. Additional reponses to PMOC. Task C - Additional work for plan and specification review and revision. Task D - Support RCTC & STV for any EIR effort required. ODC - Set up project office. Delay funding of the SSGA. Estimate Assumptions: This allocation will extend our services through December 31, 2013 for Pre -Construction Services. HDR CCC - Prime Amount Task A - Mangement/Coordination $ 250,000 Task B - Project Controls $ - Task C - Quality Assurance $ 250,000 Task D - Environmental $ 110,000 $ 610,000 Other Direct Costs Total ODC Total ODCs $ 160,000 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 770,000 214 (iNI. com i'ANI".ilr�rr; ]eriuliva, May 22, 2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Edda Rosso Project Manager Re: Contract Number 10-31-058-00 Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Pre -Construction Phase Budget Adjustment Request Dear Edda: In review of the budget for the CM team for Perris Valley Line, it appears that the additional efforts to review plans and specifications, assist bid evaluations and contract award, support RCTC's legal team and set up project office have increased our costs past that originally anticipated. As we have discussed, the start of construction for the PVL Project has incurred a series of delays since we began providing services to RCTC, moving from a construction NTP date in April 2011 to now being indeterminate based on legal issues. We've discussed with you the potential for continuing delays to impact our total cost. Upon re -assessing the impacts of the delays to late 2013, HDR finds it necessary to request a reallocation to increase the amount authorized by RCTC for our services during Phase 1, Preconstruction, of the Project. This request is primarily driven by the following tasks: • Continue to support the legal process • Additional work for plan and specification review and revision • Delay for the SSGA • Additional responses to PMOC • Set up project office • Support RCTC and STV for any EIR efforts required HDR is requesting a reallocation of $770,400 to our Pre -Construction Phase service from the balance of $12,335,450 that is allocated to the Construction tasks. Based on our forecasted effort, this allocation will extend our services through December 31, 2013 for Pre -Construction Services, leaving the remaining $11,565,050 for Construction activity. This will result in an increase in the Pre -Construction Services budget from $3,112,741 to $3,883,141. Note that the current HDR contract with RCTC expires October 31, 2013 unless extended, therefore we ask you to extend the contract. A logical date would be the FTA grant agreement revenue date of July 31, 2015. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in this matter. HDR Construction Control Corporation 3230 El Camino Real Suite 200 Irvine. CA 92602-1377 Phone:1714) 730-2300 Fax: (714i730-230i www.hdrinc.com 215 Sincerely, HDR CCC Jon Rohrer, PE Perris Valley Line Project Director Concur: Cc: Richard Bryan, RCTC/Bechtel Nisa Hester, RCTC/Bechtel Ben Beasley, RCTC/Bechtel HOR Construction Control Corporation Edda Rosso, P.E. RCTC Project Manager Leonard Beystrum, HDR CCC Sheren Chheng, HDR CCC 3230 El Canino Real Seize 20C Irvine CA 92602-1377 Phone,(7141730-2300 Fax 171d1730.2301 www.pdrfnc.com 216 Perris Valley Line Invoice Tracking Projection Projection HDR CCC SWE Arcadis Arellano DEA Ghirardelli Gonzalez -White Greigo Leighton Xorail HDR Eng Fee Invoice 33 - 05 13 Invoice 34 - 06 13 $35,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,300.00 $35,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,300.00 Projection Projection Invoice 35 - 07_13 Invoice 36 - 08_13 Projection Projection Invoice 37 - 09_13 Invoice 38 - 10_13 $35,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,300.00 Projection Projection Cost to Complete Invoice 39 - 11 13 Invoice 40 -12 13 $35,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,300.00 $35,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,300.00 Total to Date $1,569,731.59 $999,719.89 $214,090.13 $17,643.00 $101487.74 $0.00 $0.00 $232,363.83 $7,534.82 $75,537.61 $339,902.90 Original Contract Amount $615,440.00 $562,531.00 $152,415.00 $56,239.00 5125,016.00 $21,161.00 $8,534.00 $59,632.00 $61,305.00 $198,578.00 5408,034.00 $39,536.00 Proposed Budget Proposed Revised Adjustment per Agreement Total, June 2012 Evaluation Approved 7/16/2012 $417,886.00 $0.00 $72,825.00 -$24,695.00 -$23,828.00 -$21,161.00 -$8,534.00 $52,290.00 -$53,308.00 -$112,511.00 -$62,146.00 -$5,333.00 $1,033,326.00 $562,531.00 $225,240.00 $31,544.00 $101488.00 $0.00 $0.00 $111,922.00 $7,997.00 $86,067.00 $345,888.00 $34,203.00 Proposed Budget Adjustment per Oct 2012 Evaluation Proposed Revised Agreement Total Approved 12-19-12 $1,144,276.00 $662,531.00 $225,240.00 $31,544.00 $101488.00 $0.00 $0.00 $146,922.00 $7,997.00 $86,067.00 $345,888.00 $38,253.00 Proposed Budget Adjustment per Oct 2012 Evaluation $162,660.00 $143,365.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$5,000.00 $4,810.00 Proposed Revised Agreement Total Approved 2-28-13 $1,306,936.00 $805,896.00 $225,240.00 $31,544.00 $101488.00 $0.00 $0.00 $163,922.00 $7,997.00 $86,067.00 $340,888.00 $43,063.00 Remaining Balance after December 2013 (Tenative) -$262,795.59 -$193,823.99 $11,149.87 $13,901.00 $0.26 $0.00 $0.00 -$68,441.83 $462.18 $10,529.39 $985.10 Total $76,300.00 $76,300.00 $76,300.00 $76,300.00 $76,300.00 $76,300.00 $76,300.00 $76,300.00 $3,557,731.51 $2,308,421.00 $231,485.00 $2,539,906.00 $250,000.00 $2,789,906.00 $322,835.00 $30.12,741.00-$488,033.51 217 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 5 7/22/2013 Office Space $ 648,711.49 218 Engineering Change Notice Form Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 Item 05 7/22/2013 Description: Field Office Space. ODC - Monthly expenses which includes office lease, furniture lease, janitorial service, utilities, repairs/services, internet and phone. Also, office/safety equipments, office supplies, alarm system and monthly reprographics services. Originally this work was to be in the construction contract but RCTC moved it to the CM contract. All decisions, location, services etc were approved by RCTC prior to expending resources. Estimate Assumptions: These expenses occur monthly for 24 months starting from Oct 2013 which is the NTP for Contruction. HDR added an additional 6 months due to the project extension as discussed with RCTC PM Edda Rosso. If the contract goes less we will be able to reduce some recurring costs but may not be able to reduce all. If the contract goes longer, we can attempt a month to month on the space and extend other services as needed. Other Direct Costs Total Est. Units Unit Cost Total ODC Monthly Office Lease - Actual Through 02/2015 16 > 6,900.00 $ 110,400 Monthly Office Lease - Projected Through 04/2016 14 $ 6,900.00 $ 96,600 Monthly Furniture Lease - Actual Through 02/2015 15 $ 1,374.60 $ 19,794 Monthly Furniture Lease - Projected Through 04/2016 14 $ 1,374.60 $ 19,244 Monthly Janitorial Services - Projected Through 02/2015 13 $ 350.00 $ 4,645 Monthly Janitorial Services- Actual Through 04/2016 14 $ 350.00 $ 4,900 Utilities - Actual Through 02/2015 11 1,355.00 $ 14,905 Utilities - Projected Through 04/2016 14 1,355.00 $ 18,970 Repairs/Services - Actual Through 02/2015 1 $ 86,854 Capstone Construction Co. Inc. (Office Remodel) 1 12,616.72 WestCoast Lock & Safe (Entry levers - install & repairs) 1 $ 413.72 Capstone Construction Co. Inc. (Office Remodel) 1 $ 68,804.36 Erickson R11N (2% CM Fee per Section 50 of the lease) 1 $ 1,578.02 Sheppard's Business Interiors, Inc. (2% CM Fee per Section 50 of the lease) 1 $ 751.00 Quarry Capital, LLC (Annual Elevator Service Contract 2014) 1 $ 2,340.00 Precision Security Mktg Inc. (Sensors relocation - LED Keypad, Door sensor & motion sensor) 1 $ 350.00 Repairs/Services - Projected Through 04/2016 (Allowance) 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000 Internet - Actual Through 03/2014 (Verizon Business) 8 $ 6,921 Telephone - Actual Through 03/2014 (Verizon Business) 6 $ 323 Internet & Phone - Actual Through (04/2014 - 02/2015) (AT&T) 11 $ 7,637 Internet & Phone - Projected Through 04/2016 (AT&T) 14 S 680.22 $ 9,523 Office/Safety Equipments - Actual Through 02/2015 1 $ 7,780 Grainger (Ear plugs, safety glasses clear & gray) 1 $ 192.42 Vital Support Systems (23in WLED LCD) 1 $ 394.00 White Cap ordered 11/22/13 (XL Leather Drivers Gloves Brigade) 1 $ 259.20 White Cap ordered 12/20/13 (BL Crayon&BK Paint Marker Dixon&17oz Orange Spray Pnt) 1 $ 443.04 Canon Scanner 1 $ 3,182.99 Printer/Scanner 1 $ 3,296.90 Office/Safety Equipments - Projected Through 04/2016 (Allowance) 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500 Office Supplies - Actual Through 02/2015 11 $ 895.00 $ 9,845 Office Supplies - Actual Through 02/2016 14 $ 895.00 $ 12,530 Alarm System - Actual Through 02/2015 1 $ 13,149.81 $ 13,150 Installation of Alarm System 1 $ 11,767.81 Installation & Services Charges & Security Services 5/5/14 - 6/4/14 1 $ 602.13 Alarm System - Projected Through 04/2016 14 $ 59.99 $ 840 Prolog -Actual Through 02/2015 1 $ 47,136 Meridian Sytems (Sky Saas PC9 Enterprise - Subscription Term: 4/1/2014 - 4/1/2015) 1 $ 26,935.00 Meridian Sytems (Sky Saas PC9 Enterprise - Subscription Term: 5/1/2014 - 12/1/2015) 1 $ 20,201.25 Prolog - Projected Through 04/2016 (Sub Term: 1/1/2016 - 4/1/2016) 1 $ 8,231.25 $ 8,231 Reprographics -Actual Through 02/2015 16 3,155.95 $ 50,495 Reprographics - Projected Through 04/2016 14 3,100.00 $ 43,400 Sparkletts - Actual Through 02/2015 13 $ 617 Sparkletts - Projected Through 04/2016 14 78.05 $ 1,093 Total ODCs cost projected through 04/2016 $ 601,333 Estimated month to month for 3 months (Os/2o16 - 07/2016) $ 47,379 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 648,711 219 Chheng, Sheren From: Rohrer, Jon Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:13 PM To: Chheng, Sheren Subject: FW: Office Space for PVL Office Space approval from Edda Jon Rohrer, PE Vice President HDR 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602-1377 T 714.730.2300 M 949.929.4861 Jon.Rohrer@hdrinc.com hdrinc.com/follow-us From: Edda Rosso [mailto:EddaRosso@2CTC.orgl Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:58 PM To: Rohrer, Jon Cc: Beystrum, Leonard; Marc McIntyre (mmcintyre@simonwongeng.com); Richard D. Bryan Subject: Re: Office Space for PVL Approved Sent from my iPhone On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:49 PM, "Rohrer, Jon" <Jon.Rohrer@hdrinc.com> wrote: Edda, here is the cash flow for the proposed office space. Looks like the cost will be approximately $272K for rent plus about $68K for tenant improvements (the $48K shown does not include the two additional offices). Additional costs will include furniture for the offices, all IT costs (Internet, specialized software etc), phones (5), table in conference room, computers (we have not sorted that out yet but I am guessing likely one desktop computer, maybe 2, all others with Laptops that are an ODC already), reproduction (all copies, prints etc). I do not know the costs of these items yet but wanted to get your approval to proceed with the office preparation (lease and TI's). The time frame, due to negotiations with the owner and the changes to the number offices has now pushed us to about April 1 move in. Thanks in advance. I am working on all the other stuff (costs) and will get them shortly. JON ROHRER, PE HDR Construction Control Corporation Vice President, Department Manager 1 220 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200I Irvine, CA 92602 714.730.2300 1 c: 949.929.4861 jonsohrer@hdrinc.comihdrinc.com Follow Us — Architizer l Facebook 1 Twitter l YouTube l Flickr <Moreno Valley - Hemlock Ave Cash Flow.pdf� 2 221 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount Native American Montoring - Email from Steve Keel destignating HDR as the contact for Pechanga & 6 11/20/2012 Soboba $ 193,467.25 222 Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Engineering Change Notice Form Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: 10-31-058-00 Change No.: Item 06 Date Initiated: 11/20/2012 Description: Native American Monitoring - Email from Steve Keel designating HDR as the contact for Pechanga & Soboba Estimate Assumptions: Personnel Category Hours Rate Salary Labor Pechanga 1,278 $ 91,050 Native Monitor 310 60.00 $ 18,600 Native Monitor - OT 0 > 90.00 $ Native Monitor - DT 0 120.00 $ - 3% Mark -Up on Sub $ 558 Mileage 6,000 0.58 $ 3,450 Invoice to Date as of 02/15 968 $ 68,442 Soboba 976 $ 86,308 Native Monitor 275 $ 75.00 $ 20,625 Native Monitor - OT 0 112.50 $ - Native Monitor - DT 0 150.00 $ Admin Fee - 15% 1 3,093.75 $ 3,094 3% Mark -Up on Sub $ 619 Invoice to Date as of 02/15 700 $ 61,971 HDR ENG 136 $ 16,109 Amy Gusick - Invoice to Date as of 02/15 116 118.10 $ 13,747 20 118.10 $ 2,362 0 $ 0 $ Invoice to Date as of 02/15 0 $ Total Hours 1,414 $ 193,467 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 193,467 223 Chheng, Sheren From: Rohrer, Jon Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:12 PM To: Chheng, Sheren Subject: FW: Perris Valley Rail Agreement Back up for PVL Native American Monitoring Jon Rohrer, PE Vice President HDR 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602-1377 T 714.730.2300 M 949.929.4861 Jon.Rohrer@hdrinc.com hdrinc.com/follow-us Original Message From: Steve Keel [mailto:SKeel@bec-riv.orcq] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:24 AM To: Marcy Hernandez Cc: Edda Rosso; Richard D. Bryan; Rohrer, Jon Subject: FW: Perris Valley Rail Agreement Hello, Marcy. The HDR contact person for the monitoring agreement is: JON ROHRER, PE HDR Construction Control Corporation Vice President, Department Manager 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 2001 Irvine, CA 92602 714.730.2300 I c: 949.929.4861 jon.rohrer@hdrinc.com I hdrinc.com Please let me know if I can assist in any way. Regards, Steve Steven Keel Bechtel Infrastructure/ Riverside County Transportation Commission 3850 Vine Street, Suite 210 Riverside, CA 92507 skeel@bec-riv.org slkeel@bechtel.com (951) 787-7961 (office) (951) 205-6197 (cell) (951) 778-1099 (fax) 1 224 Original Message From: Anna Hoover [mailto:ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:34 PM To: Steve Keel Cc: Marcy Hernandez; Edda Rosso; Richard D. Bryan; jon.rohrer@hdrinc.com Subject: RE: Perris Valley Rail Agreement Hi Steve! Thanks for the information! Happy Thanksgiving to you as well! Anna Original Message From: Steve Keel [mailto:SKeel@bec-riv.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:11 AM To: Anna Hoover Cc: Marcy Hernandez; Edda Rosso; Richard D. Bryan; 'jon.rohrer@hdrinc.com' Subject: RE: Perris Valley Rail Agreement Hi, Anna. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. The agreement will be with HDR, the RCTC Construction Manager for the Perris Valley Line. The contact person's information is: JON ROHRER, PE HDR Construction Control Corporation Vice President, Department Manager 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 2001 Irvine, CA 92602 714.730.2300 I c: 949.929.4861 jon.rohrer@hdrinc.com I hdrinc.com Please advise if you have any further questions or need anything from RCTC. Thanks and have a Happy Thanksgiving. Steve Steven Keel Riverside County Transportation Commission/ Bechtel Infrastructure 3850 Vine Street, Suite 201 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 787-7961 (office) (951) 205-6197 (cell) (951) 778-1099 (fax) skeel@bec-riv.orq (email) Original Message From: Anna Hoover [mailto:ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:36 PM To: Steve Keel; slkeel@bechtel.com Cc: Marcy Hernandez Subject: RE: Perris Valley Rail Agreement Steve, Our original agreement was with Applied Earthworks. Will that be the same for this one as well? If not, can you please provide the name, address, phone, fax and e-mail of the person/entity that will be signing the agreement. Thanks! 2 225 Anna M. Hoover Cultural Analyst Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians P.O. Box 2183 Temecula, CA 92593 951-770-8104 (0) 951-694-0446(F) 951-757-6139 (C) ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov Original Message From: Steve Keel [mailto:SKeel(a�bec-riv.org] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 10:13 AM To: Anna Hoover; slkeel@bechtel.com Cc: Marcy Hernandez Subject: RE: Perris Valley Rail Agreement Hello, Anna. On the surface it seems an amendment would be easiest. What do you think? Thanks. Steven Keel Riverside County Transportation Commission/ Bechtel Infrastructure 3850 Vine Street, Suite 201 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 787-7961 (office) (951) 205-6197 (cell) (951) 778-1099 (fax) skeel@bec-riv.org (email) Original Message From: Anna Hoover [mailto:ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 10:06 AM To: Steve Keel; slkeel@bechtel.com Cc: Marcy Hernandez Subject: Perris Valley Rail Agreement Steve, We were wondering if you would prefer an amendment to the existing agreement or a new agreement? Thanks! Anna Hoover Sent with my Blackberry Mobile device 3 226 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 7 7/3/2014 Additional Surveying by DEA - Received services request from DEA via email $ 219,877.17 227 Engineering Change Notice Form Project: Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Company: Estimated By: Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Title: HDR Construction Control Corporation Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 Item 07 4/17/2015 Additional hours due to validation of QA/QC. As built Record of Track Geometry for the Rail only for the entire corridor. Additional Surveying Services - Discrepancies on Designer's Survey Plats at the Crossings required CM Surveyor to review, reconcile and prepare Survey Exhibits for Description: Construction. Task 1, the additional Construction & Post Construction support is based on performing QA as -built checks of ALL 17 crossings rather than the1:5 ratio required (QA:QC) and was triggered by field issues encountered on the first 2 crossings reviewed. Task 2, the time and materials utilized in the Estimate Assumptions: preparation of conformed survey plats were identified and tracked separate from conventional services rendered, the amount reflects the actual money spent in this issue. Personnel Category Hours Rate Salary Labor DEA - Construction & Post- Construction Support 681 $ 182,636 Survey Manager 65 $ 194.02 $ 12,611 Survey Analist 312 $ 172.11 $ 53,698 3-Person Crew 248 $ 410.25 $ 101,742 Party -Chief 40 $ 165.00 $ 6,600 3% Mark -Up on Sub $ 5,240 Mileage 2,500 $ 0.57 $ 1,425 Static Scanner 16 $ 82.50 $ 1,320 Additional Surveying Services - Discrepancies of Designer's Survey Plats $ 37,241 3% Mark -Up on Sub 0 - $ 1,117 Total Hours 681 $ 219,877 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 219,877 228 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 8 12/19/2014 Additional QC services for Leighton $ 36,482.60 229 Engineering Change Notice Form Project: Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Company: HDR Construction Control Corporation Estimated By: Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Title: Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: 10-31-058-00 Change No.: Item 08 Date Initiated: 12/19/2014 Description: Additional QC services for Leighton & Environmental Mitigation Testing. The Additional Soil Testing for Environmental compliance was triggered by VECP # 1 and was not contemplated in Leighton's original scope of work. The Gamma -Gamma testing was added after the QC responsibility for CIDH Concrete Testing was shifted to the CM/Owner due to conflicts/discrepancies in the Special Provisions. Bridge Asbestos Testing was added in order to start the demolition of existing Bridges over the San Jacinto River Estimate Assumptions: The amounts shown on Task 1 "Additional QC Services for the following" are actual costs incurred by Leighton's subcontractors plus 10% allowance for QC/QA reviews by Leighton's Project Manager and Senior Engineer. Personnel Category Hours Rate Salary Labor Additional QC Services for the following $ 36,483 Environmental Testing (Soil Testing for VECP # 1) $ 9,570 Gamma -gamma $ 17,050 Bridge Asbestos $ 8,800 3% Mark -Up on Sub $ 1,063 0 $ Total Hours 0 $ 36,483 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 36,483 230 Chheng, Sheren From: Salazar-Bueno, Oscar Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:10 PM To: Rohrer, Jon; Chheng, Sheren Subject: FW: Budget' PVL Attachments: Enviro and Gamma_Gamma'v2.pdf Oscar Salazar-Bueno, PE Resident Engineer/Project Manager HDR 2280 Market Street, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 D 951.320.7300 M 951.544.1310 oscar.salazar-bueno@hdrinc.com hdrinc.com/follow-us From: Simon Saiid[mailto:ssaiid@leightongroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:38 PM To: Salazar-Bueno, Oscar Cc: Beystrum, Leonard Subject: RE: Budget' PVL Oscar, I reviewed project charges for 2014 and found analytical lab testing on soils samples and staff support/sampling (see attached). A quick/rough preliminary estimate is as follows: - Enviro testing $8,700 (10% can be added for PM time and Sr. review) Gamma-gamma-$15,500 (10% can be added for PM time and Sr. review) - Bridge Asbestos-$8,000 (10% can be added for PM time and Sr. review) I'm still working on projections for field welding. Simon I. Saiid, PE, GE Principal Engineer Leighton - Temecula/Palm Desert Office 951.252.8013 Direct 760.776.4192 Direct 909.684.6462 Cell From: Salazar-Bueno, Oscar [mailto:Oscar.Salazar-Bueno@hdrinc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:46 PM To: Simon Saiid Cc: Salazar-Bueno, Oscar; Beystrum, Leonard Subject: Re: Budget' PVL Simon, For soil testing we need the amount of money spent testing the soil for chemical contaminants before exporting it out the site. There were on site testing and testing at the stockpile at the LNR Properties. 1 231 I think this was done just after you took over for Siva... Give me a call tomorrow if you have any questions Sent from my iPhone On Apr 23, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Simon Saiid <ssaiid@leightongroup.com> wrote: Oscar, When do you need this by? This may take some time to project cost as I need to talk to other people and estimate based on feedbacks from field, etc. I can probably give your cost for Gamma -Gamma rather quickly. But what do you mean by soils testing (field compaction testing and lab testing for all: subgrade & fill?). Thanks. Simon I. Saiid, PE, GE Principal Engineer Leighton - Temecula/Palm Desert Office 951.252.8013 Direct 760.776.4192 Direct 909.684.6462 Cell From: Salazar-Bueno, Oscar [mailto:Oscar.Salazar-Bueno@drinc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:15 AM To: Simon Saiid Cc: Beystrum, Leonard; Dina Rochford; Tom Benson Subject: Budget Good Morning Simon, Please provide us with a cost break down billed to date for the following items: • Soil Testing (On site and Stockpile Analysis) • Gamma -Gamma Testing Are there any other services that could be considered "out of the original scope" and have been provided? We are putting together our Cost to Complete and need this information to justify the request for additional funds Also, can you please provide us with a cost projection for : • Non Destructive Testing for Welding at Bridges • Non Destructive Testing for Welding at Stations • Ultrasound Testing for CWR Thermite welds Thanks, Oscar Salazar-Bueno, PE Resident Engineer/Project Manager HDR 2280 Market Street, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 D 951.320.7300 M 951.544.1310 oscar.salazar-bueno@hdrinc.com hdrinc.com/follow-us 2 232 Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Trend Log Change Notice Title Trend Amount 9 10/2/2014 Add Deputy PM (Oscar) $ 608,257.00 233 Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Engineering Change Notice Form Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 09 10/2/2014 Description: Add a Deputy PM position to this contract. This was requested by RCTC PM Edda Rosso. Estimate Assumptions: Full time through April 2016 with possibility of extending 3 additional months if project is extended. Personnel Category Hours Rate Salary Labor Deputy Project Manager Added Classification 3,157 $ 579,086 Deputy Project Manager - Actual Through 02/2015 802 $ 129,140 Deputy Project Manager - 2015 with old audited OH 683 $ 180.14 $ 122,946 Deputy Project Manager - 2015 with new audited OH 1,000 $ 192.48 $ 192,480 Deputy Project Manager - 2016 672 $ 200.18 $ 134,521 Total Hours 3,157 $ 579,086 Other Direct Costs Total Est. Units Unit Cost Total ODC Vehicle/Cell Phone/Laptop 3,157 9.24 $ 29,171 Total ODCs $ 29,171 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 608,257 234 hdrinc.com October 2, 2014 Edda Rosso Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Ms. Rosso, Pursuant to our Agreement and per your request HDR would like to add a Deputy PM position to this contract. This position range of direct hourly rates will be $69.00 to $89.001per hour. As discussed, Oscar Salazar-Bueno will be filling this position. The Assistant Resident Engineer position that Oscar has now will be backfilled by HDR pending your approval. The effective date of this request is October 6, 2014. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. Sincerely, Jon Rohrer, PE Perris Valley Line Project Director Cc: Leonard Beystrum, HDR CCC Sheren Chheng, HDR CCC Marc McIntyre, PVL Project Mgr. 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92602 T 714.730.2300 F 714.730.2301 Concur: Edda Rosso, Project Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission Nisa Hester, RCTCIBechtel Butch Soderberg, RCTCIBechtel Matthew Wallace, Procurement Mgr. 235 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 10 5/1/2015 Time extension due to delay and other extra works $ 2,103,947.93 236 Engineering Change Notice Form Project: Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Company: Estimated By: Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Title: HDR Construction Control Corporation Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 10 10/2/2014 Description: Extension to time due to delay and extra work occurred. The below $ represent the effort for Jan, Feb and Mar of 2015 services provided by HDR and team which we experienced during the peak. The hours and staffs required for the peak are in those invoices which we have already submitted and some have already been approved. Estimate Assumptions: Extension of time. Hours Rate Salary Labor HDR & Team 0 $ 2,251,913 HDR CCC $ 662,408 Simon Wong Engineering $ 866,238 Arcadis $ 117,554 Arellano $ 18,292 David Evans $ 48,232 Ghirardelli $ 58,820 Gonzalez -White $ 4,804 Soteria $ 99,234 Leighton $ 157,340 Xorail $ 79,759 HDR ENG $ 97,705 Fee $ 41,526 HDR CCC 0 $ (147,965) Deputy PM Actual Labor that already been captured in Trend No. 09 $ (91,237) Deputy PM Actual ODCs that already been captured in Trend No. 09 $ (4,680) Office Space Expenses Actual that already been captured in Trend No. 05 $ (52,048) Total Hours 0 $ 2,103,948 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 2,103,948 237 Chheng, Sheren From: Beystrum, Leonard Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 12:56 PM To: Chheng, Sheren; Salazar-Bueno, Oscar Cc: Rohrer, Jon Subject: RE: PVL Phase II - Additional hours/staff that need to complete project Original construction period = 21 Months (10/7/13 thru 7/9/15) Projected construction period = 24 months (10/7/13 thru 10/9/15 +/-) 3 additional months Take 3 months of actual costs for HDR & all subconsultants (ie, Jan/Feb/Mar 2015)...that will be the additional cost due to extended time of construction period. Where some consultants were tardy in submitting invoices, we should make sure that they are included appropriately. From: Chheng, Sheren Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 11:00 AM To: Salazar-Bueno, Oscar; Beystrum, Leonard Cc: Rohrer, Jon Subject: PVL Phase II - Additional hours/staff that need to complete project Good morning Oscar/Len, As you know, we are working on the trend reports for RCTC and I need your help. Jon and I would like to wrap up the trend report today if possible. What are the additional hours/staffs that we would need for the additional time due to delay or time extension of the contract? Also, which subs we are using because it determines the additional fee for us too? If you provide me the staffs and hours I can put something together and you guys can review. Thanks, Sheren Chheng Sr. Admin. Project Coordinator HDR 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602-1377 D 714-368-5640 sheren.chheng@hdrinc.com hdrinc.com/follow-us 1 238 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 11 5/5/2015 Ames changing their cirtical path $ 693,874.35 239 Engineering Change Notice Form Project: Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Company: Estimated By: Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Title: HDR Construction Control Corporation Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 11 10/2/2014 Description: Adding another month of peak time due to Ames changing their critical path. Using Feb 2015 actual since it's a short calendar days compared to January and March which have 31 days. Estimate Assumptions: Extension of time. Hours Rate Salary Labor HDR & Team 0 $ 733,255 HDR CCC $ 209,843 Simon Wong Engineering $ 313,540 Arcadis $ 36,540 Arellano $ 5,257 David Evans $ 19,649 Ghirardelli $ 18,636 Gonzalez -White $ 1,319 Soteria $ 25,318 Leighton $ 30,468 Xorail $ 26,236 HDR ENG $ 33,008 Fee $ 13,442 HDR CCC 0 $ (39,381) Deputy PM Actual Labor that already been captured in Trend No. 09 $ (29,181) Deputy PM Actual ODCs that already been captured in Trend No. 09 $ (1,497) Office Space Expenses Actual that already been captured in Trend No. 05 $ (8,703) Total Hours 0 $ 693,874 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 693,874 240 Change Notice Trend Log Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project Updated Item No. Date Initiated Change Notice Title Trend Amount 12 5/7/2015 Contingency for final close out delay caused by extension of contractor's schedule. $ 205,219.99 241 Project: Company: Estimated By: Title: Engineering Change Notice Form Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project HDR Construction Control Corporation Jon Rohrer & Leonard Beystrum Project Director & Resident Engineer Contract No.: Change No.: Date Initiated: 10-31-058-00 12 5/7/2015 Description: Contingency for final close out delay caused by extension of contractor's schedule, potential claims or other unforeseen reasons. Estimate Assumptions: Final closeout may include additional time for support of RCTC during negotiations for final change orders, claims or response to the proposed final estimate. Personnel Category Hours Rate Salary Labor Potential Final Close-out 1,488 $ 199,159 Deputy PM 328 $ 198.26 $ 65,029 Resident Engineer 328 $ 185.19 $ 60,741 Project Administrator 416 $ 76.96 $ 32,014 Document Control 416 $ 96.56 $ 40,170 3% Mark -Up on Sub $ 1,205 Total Hours 1,488 $ 199,159 Other Direct Costs Total Est. Units Unit Cost Total ODC Vehicle/Cell Phone/Laptop 656 $ 6,061 Total ODCs $ 6,061 Total Estimated Cost & Fee $ 205,220 242 AGENDA ITEM 8K RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2015/16 — 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plans STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 2015/16 — 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Under state law, the Commission is tasked with the responsibility to identify, analyze, and recommend potential productivity improvements to ensure federal, state, and local funds allocated to transit operators provide services needed by county residents and are used in an efficient and effective manner. Through the SRTP planning process, the Commission and transit agencies analyze current transportation services, identify transit needs of the community and determine the ability to meet those needs in a three-year time frame. The Riverside County FYs 2015/16 — 2017/18 SRTPs cover the three apportionment areas of the county and are comprised of plans for the municipal operators, RTA, SunLine, PVVTA, and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program in Western Riverside and Coachella Valley. The SRTPs serve as the county's blueprint for continued operation and future development of transit services, operations and infrastructure. The SRTP process also requires the transit operators to address recommendations made by regular performance audits. The recommendations that impact service and operations are then included in subsequent SRTP documents. To meet the growing demand for transit services, the operators are focusing on implementing new routes, improving frequency, and refining schedules to a develop stronger intercity and regional network. Express bus route and CommuterLink route extensions to the Perris Valley Line (PVL) trains, which operate along the 91 Line are planned for implementation this next fiscal year. Procurement of needed vehicles is ongoing for both expansion and replacement of aging buses. To ensure service quality and reliability, other capital facilities such as transit centers, bus shelters, additional slow fill stations, and compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling dispensers are planned for construction and installation. A sizable portion of each agency's Agenda Item 8K 243 capital plan also includes safety and security equipment such as video surveillance upgrades at Commission -owned stations, security lighting, upgraded camera system, emergency generator project, and positive train control (PTC) for Metrolink, which help to ensure safety of the region's transportation system. In addition, necessary access and mobility improvements are also being implemented to better serve the county's lower -income, elderly and disabled populations. This annual update aims to continue evaluating current transit service to keep up with the region's growing population, expanding economy and increasing traveling needs of the public. Each operator's performance data is incorporated into the SRTP preparation to provide context for potential service and new capital equipment and facility considerations for existing and the next three year's investment. While the SRTPs include projected financial needs, the actual allocation of funds will occur via the public hearing to be conducted at the July Commission meeting. City of Banning The city of Banning (Banning) works closely with the city of Beaumont (Beaumont) to provide a seamless transit system for the residents of Banning, Beaumont, and the unincorporated areas of Cabazon and Cherry Valley, and the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians reservation. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: • Realign existing Routes 1, 5, and 6 to provide increased service within Banning and to meet demand presented by the growth of the Mt. San Jacinto Pass Campus; • Purchase and implement the use of a software system to improve Dial -A -Ride scheduling and dispatching; • Install auto display and enunciator equipment for fixed route fleet and purchase additional equipment for a camera system to enable wireless download; and • Continue coordination with Beaumont staff regarding fares, routes/schedules, and passenger amenities to ensure a seamless connection and ease of use for the Pass Area residents. City of Beaumont Beaumont Transit provides both Dial -A -Ride and fixed route services and works closely with Banning to provide a seamless transit system in the Pass Area. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: • Increase service by providing additional buses at peak times and add Saturday service on Route 220 to increase regional connection to San Bernardino County; • Install more bus shelters and bus benches throughout the service area; Agenda Item 8K 244 " Expand outreach efforts to senior citizens organizations, schools, and major employers as well as to veterans and active service members; and " Continue collaborative efforts with Banning to improve coordination of routes, schedules, passenger amenities, and fares for seamless transit service in the Pass Area. City of Corona The city of Corona (Corona) operates a fixed route system known as the Corona Cruiser and a general public Dial -A -Ride program. Corona closely coordinates all transfers with both RTA and the Commission's Commuter Rail services. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: " Adjust Corona Cruiser bus schedule to reflect longer trips due to increasing congestion during the construction activities for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project; " Complete bus stop enhancement and accessibility improvements; " Accept delivery of seven low -floor buses and procure eight replacement Dial -A -Ride vehicles and two medium duty fixed route buses; and " Continue to work with the Corona -Norco Unified School District to identify times and locations to serve commuting students. City of Riverside  Special Services Riverside Special Services (RSS) operates a 24-hour advance reservation dial -a -ride for seniors and persons with disabilities within the Riverside city limits. The program serves as an alternative to RTA's transit service for seniors and persons with disabilities unable to use fixed route service. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: " Finalize renovation of the administration building and operations facility, which will increase operation efficiency and enhance access to the building by clients seeking to purchase passes and tickets; " Procure nine paratransit vehicles for replacement using Federal Transit Administration and Proposition 1B funds; and " Purchase emergency response equipment and install additional lighting and cameras in the transportation parking lot and maintenance facility. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency The PVVTA provides fixed route service and a transportation reimbursement program for individuals who cannot ride the public bus system. The fixed route service can deviate up to three-quarters of a mile away from the actual fixed route. Service is provided within the city of Blythe and surrounding unincorporated county areas in the Palo Verde Valley. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: Agenda Item 8K 245 " Implement minor routing changes for Blue Route 1, additional tripper service for Gold Route 2, reduction of one trip for Red Route 3, additional trip for Green Route 4, and reduction of daily service hours on Silver Route 5; " Continue operation of XTend-A-Ride service, a demand response service that addresses requests for special transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system; " Consider expansion of the CNG fuel station due to increased fueling demand even after only one year of operation; and " Continue to place passenger amenities at strategic locations to promote new ridership through target marketing and partnerships. Riverside Transit Agency RTA provides local, intercity, and regional transportation services. As the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) for Western Riverside County, RTA is responsible for coordinating transit services throughout the service area and providing driver training and grant application assistance to operators in Western County. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: " Implement proposed service changes that will focus on providing good connectivity to and from the Perris Valley Line rail extension between Downtown Riverside and South Perris with planned service scheduled to start in December 2015. " Restructure Routes 7, 8, and 23 in the cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and Wildomar areas based on the recently completed Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) 10-Year Transit Network Plan; " Progressively implement changes based on the COA 10-Year Transit Network Plan subject to funding availability and the required operational resources; and " Increase the operating budget by approximately 3.1 percent over the FY 2014/15 budget. SunLine Transit Agency SunLine is the CTSA for the Coachella Valley and is responsible for coordinating transit services in the valley, which covers a service area of approximately 1,120 square miles. SunLine provides both local and regional transportation services with 15 fixed routes and demand response Dial -A -Ride services known as SunDial. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: " Implement new express service Line 20 between the city of Desert Hot Springs and the Westfield Transit Center in Palm Desert; " Implement improved weekend service frequency for Line 91; " Extend Line 111 service from Indio to Coachella via Indio Boulevard and Harrison Street; " Introduce SunTaxi service as an alternative service option for seniors and disabled; " Introduce weekend service and consider adding early and late trips on weekdays on Line 95 that services Mecca and North Shore; and " Continue Taxi Voucher program in Coachella Valley. Agenda Item 8K 246 Commission's Rail Program The Southern California Regional Rail Authority operates seven commuter rail lines with 52 locomotives and 150 commuter rail cars. Three routes - the Riverside to Los Angeles Line, the Inland Empire to Orange County Line (IE0C), and the Riverside to Los Angeles via Fullerton Line (91 Line) - directly serve Western Riverside County with connecting service available to destinations on the other four Metrolink lines. Planned services for FY 2015/16 include: • Plan no fare increase for FY 2015/16; • Complete construction of the Perris Valley 91 Line Metrolink extension and implement service; • Recognize significant cost increase due to implementation of PTC and start up cost of the PVL; and • Support development of Coachella Valley commuter rail facilities. Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service The proposed 200-mile long rail corridor service in Coachella Valley will run from Los Angeles to Indio through the four Southern California counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino to provide a convenient scheduled link to the communities in the fast-growing Coachella Valley and Banning Pass areas. The Commission will lead the planning efforts for the service development plan of the corridor service in coordination with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments. Financial support will come primarily from state and federal grant funds that are deposited and maintained in the Coachella Valley Rail Fund. Planning efforts for FY 2015/16 include: • Complete the Market Analysis; • Prepare the Alternative Analysis; • Develop a preliminary service plan; and • Draft a full service development plan using a recent Federal Railroad Administration grant award of $2.9 million. Attachments: FYs 2015/16 - 2017/18 Operator SRTPs - Posted on the Commission Website 1) City of Banning 2) City of Beaumont 3) City of Corona 4) City of Riverside 5) Coachella Valley Rail Program 6) PVVTA 7) RTA 8) SunLine 9) Western Riverside Rail Program Agenda Item 8K 247 PA SSTRANSIT Short Range Transit Plan FY 2015/16 - 2016/17 FINAL DRAFT Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 System Overview 1.1 Service Area Overview 3 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 4 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Service and Paratransit Service 6 1.4 Current and Proposed Fare Structure, if any 6 1.5 Revenue Fleet 7 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities 8 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies 8 2 Existing Services and Route Performance 2.1 Fixed Route Services 9 2.2 Dial -a -Ride Service 12 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 12 2.4 Productivity Improvements Efforts 13 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth 14 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 14 3 Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 Recent Service Changes 3.2 Recommended Local & Express Route; Changes to Paratransit Service 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotions 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes 14 17 17 18 4 Financial and Capital Plans 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget Narrative 18 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program 18 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 18 • ADA, DBE, EEO, Title VI • TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD • Alternative Fueled Vehicles Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California 5 Tables 1. Fleet Inventory a. Motor Bus b. Demand Response 2. SRTP Service Summary a. Total Service Summary b. Motor Bus c. Demand Response 3. SRTP Route Statistics Table 3A — Individual Route 4. Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification 5.1 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 5.2 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 6. FY 2009 — 2012 TDA Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations 7 Performance Target Report 2014/15 through 3rd quarter 8. Performance Report 2015/16 9. A. Highlights of FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan B. Fare Revenue Calculation Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 1 System Overview Service Area Map 1.1 - Service Area Overview The Banning Transit system serves many areas, including the commercial and residential areas of Banning and Cabazon, as well as the commercial areas of the Morongo Indian Reservation and limited commercial areas of Beaumont. The cities of Banning and Beaumont operate under a shared brand identity, "Pass Transit." Pass Transit offers seamless transit by coordinating transportation services that cover approximately 40 square miles in the pass area with routes connecting to regional services. Within the service area, population is mixed with areas of both high and low densities. The current routes have been planned by taking advantage of this knowledge, allowing the system to operate more efficiently. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 1.2 - Area Demographics Riverside County covers 7,208 square miles with a population of over 2.2 million people in 2010, per the U.S. Census. The population density for Riverside County is 303.8 people per square mile, largely due to the vast desert areas that are not populated. The city of Banning covers 23 square miles with a population of 29,603 people in 2010, per the U.S. Census. The population density for Banning is 1,300 per square mile. The population of the service area covered by Banning Transit has grown by approximately 29% over the last ten years. The racial makeup of the city is as follows: 4.87% F2.30% 8.55% 64.7 4% Population Ethnicity O white/Caucasian II Hispanic or Latino Other (one race) ■ African American Asian Other (two or more races) Native American The average age of the population is the following: • 65+ Years • Under 19 Years • 45-64 Years • 25-44 Years • 20-34 Years 25.88% 25.78% 21.57% 20.43 17.48% The average age of the population is 42.3 years old. 5 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Rider Demographics In 2013, a survey was conducted showing the demographics of the Pass Transit riders. The information gathered helped create a visual indication of the use of the system. The racial makeup of the ridership is as follows: Rider Ethnicity 2% r t00% 47% ■ White/Caucasian ■ Hispanic African American ■ Other ■ Native American Asian Furthermore, 86% of respondents stated that they used the system's fixed routes at least three times a week. 59% of the ridership used the bus service for local trips within the Banning/Beaumont/Cabazon area, and 49% use the transit to travel outside of Pass Transit's service area. For 91 % of ridership, the bus system is their only means of transportation. An unspecified amount of respondents stated that the transit service is readily available in their area, with a majority of riders living within a two block radius of a bus stop. A majority of the systems riders share the commonality of being either underemployed or unemployed, with 88% of riders reporting an annual household income of $20,000 or less and 81 % of respondents report a household of two or more. 87% of the respondent households speak English as their primary language, while 13% speak Spanish. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 1.3 — Existing Service and Route Performance The Banning Transit System currently has three fixed route services which serve the main streets of Beaumont, the main streets and neighborhood areas of Banning, and both the residential and business areas of Cabazon. Based on route recommendations produced by a Comprehensive Operational Analysis, changes were made to the fixed route service in July 2015. Reconfiguration of routes will begin in July of 2015. Banning's fixed route buses are accessible to people with disabilities. Each bus is equipped with a wheelchair lift or ramp along with two wheelchair securement locations. Banning offers individualized travel training to assist new passengers in learning how to ride these buses. Banning Paratransit is a origin -to -destination shared ride transportation service for seniors age 60 and older and persons who are, due to their functional limitation(s), unable to use accessible fixed route bus service. Passengers must be certified eligible per guidelines established in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 1.4 — Current and Proposed Fare Structure The Pass Transit system has adopted a mutual service fare to make traveling more accessible to those who utilize the system. The chart below has a detailed breakdown of the current fares for available services: Dial -A -Ride Fares Fare Categories Base Fare 10-Ride Punch Card One -Way $2.00 $18.00 Companion I $3.00 N/A PCA (w/ I.D.)* No Show $2.00 N/A *Personal Care Attendant must show proper ID each time they board. FREE FREE 7 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Fare Categories General Youth (grades K-12) Senior (60+) Disabled Military Veterans Child (46" tall or under. Must be accompanied by full fare paying passenger.) Transfer Ticket (Cabazon Circulator) Deviations (Routes 3 & 4) Active Military GOPass (During school session only) Jury Duty 1.5 - Fleet Characteristics Fixed Route Base Day Pass 10-Tripper 10-Ticket Monthly Fare Punch Book Pass Pass $1.15 $3.00 N/A $10.35 $36.00 $1.00 $3.00 $10.00 N/A $30.00 $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 $.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A $.25 $.25 $.25 $.25 N/A $.25 $.25 $.25 $.25 $.25 FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A Banning Transit System operates five fixed route vehicles (four in revenue service and one as spares), all of which are powered by compressed natural gas (CNG). The vehicles are equipped with bicycle racks for two bicycles, and are in compliance with the ADA with mobility device lifts and two tie -down stations per bus. The transit system also has six Dial -A -Ride vehicles (two in revenue service and one as a spare). Two of three remaining are utilized as back-up for the fixed -route, if needed, and the other is scheduled to be taken out of service and scheduled for auction. All are in compliance with the ADA, with mobility device lifts and tie -down stations for four mobility devices. Banning Pass Transit also has four support vehicles that are used for driver relief or administrative errands. Two replacement buses for the fixed routes have been ordered which will be delivered at the end of June 2015. The City adheres to California Highway Patrol (CHP) mandated Preventive Maintenance Inspection criteria and is very proactive in maintenance efforts. See the City of Banning Fleet Inventory Table 1 for individual vehicle characteristics. 8 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 1.6 — Existing Facility/Planned Facilities Banning Transit System functions as a department within the City and utilizes existing facilities. Transit Administrative staff is housed at the City's Community Center located at 789 North San Gorgonio Avenue, where bus passes are sold, schedules are available and all ADA applications are processed. Dispatch and general telephone information is also provided at the transit office within the Community Center. Banning Pass Transit Office Hours Monday — Thursday: 7:30am to 6:OOpm Friday: 8:OOam to 3:OOpm The maintenance, parking, fueling of the buses, and storage of bus stop amenities are performed at the City's Corporation Yard located at 176 East Lincoln Street. Maintenance of the vehicles is performed by the Public Works Department, Fleet Maintenance Division. There are currently no plans to expand Banning Pass Transit System facilities. 1.7 — Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies Currently, the cities of Banning and Beaumont operate under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which allows for each respective agencies to cross jurisdictional boundary lines, allowing simplified travel for passengers throughout the Pass area. In addition, an MOU is held with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians allowing stops on their property. The ability to provide a stop at Casino Morongo allows passengers to make connections with Sunline Commuter Link 220, providing service from Palm Desert to Riverside. In addition, services are also coordinated with Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) by providing timed stops that meet with routes that provide travel to and from the areas of Hemet and Moreno Valley. 9 Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California 2 Existing Service and Route Performance 2.1 — Fixed Route Service The Banning Transit System currently has three fixed route services which serve the main streets of Beaumont, the main streets and neighborhood areas of Banning, and both the residential and business areas of Cabazon. Based on route recommendations produced by a Comprehensive Operational Analysis, changes were made to the fixed route service in July, 2014. Reconfiguration of routes will begin in July of 2015. Route 1 — Beaumont/Banning/Cabazon Pass Transit Route 1 is among the most used route in the system, operating primarily along Ramsey Street and 6th Street and serving the commercial areas of Cabazon and Casino Morongo. Ridership on Route 1 accounts for 27% of the total use of the system. While the longest route in distance, this route operates on a one -hour headway and serves many important areas. The major stops on this route include Albertsons, Wal- Mart, Beaumont City Hall, Greyhound Crucero Agency, Banning City Hall, Mid -County Justice Center, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Casino Morongo and the Desert Hills Outlets in Cabazon. These stops, along with a stop at the Amtrak California Thruway bus stop allow the passengers to get from where they are to where they need to be, even if their destination is out of the Pass Transit service area. ROUTE ■ CoL ar Wev -of r m Rome ®®® ®®- 8eaeuinont e-ivie l-enter' 6th Stree VMal-martTransla' S�tian Trans`- Route; ®EMEI® ® 22O ®® San Gorspr5o i-Ioapil l Trans! io RoutES ®IIII� ®m st treet 2 San Gorr]onin Hospital Legend I Flap not to state Ilia Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point i3annig Police Dept Transfer t Route o Eta nn/ny Police Llrpf ]3.-tti 17tiG Mores kr. Trartsfti n Root Caba,on Grculabol ifravn90 Trso-rei to Rain Amtrak 10 Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California Cabazon Circulator The Cabazon Circulator differs from other routes in the fact that it only circulates throughout the residential and commercial areas of Cabazon. This Route is crucial to the area because it allows riders from the most remote areas of Cabazon to reach important destinations such as the Casino Morongo or the Cabazon Outlets. In addition, this route travels directly to the transfer point for Route 1 which allows travel to the business areas of Banning and Beaumont, as well as connections with regional transit services. Y•i• • �w W ki0 IOL 7 17 1LYV 741 L{Q ■ na a ae Y1F 1.m ra+ s+* k 134 ww 18 i] FI a 14.17,' `,{, RV12.7.E L+OF 1 d+ 147 iA1 2 di 2.17 I. ON 1 }b }•7 • Il• i1F7 ar svt }.WF 1434 }�a b14 71�! * " �iF1R Cry Circulator 11411410 +• • 4 SATURDAY B SUNDAY HOURS ARE 13:00ANI-5:104PN4orwr ,... . �_ •,- 6.2LD .4 • ta—.• Major stops on this route are the Banning Justice Center, Mt. San Jacinto Pass Campus, the Banning Municipal Library, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital and limited commercial areas along both Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue. This neighborhood feeder route provides service at many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices. Some of these destinations include: Banning City Hall, Fox Cinemas, Albertsons, Walgreens and Rite Aid Pharmacies, the Banning Municipal Library, Banning Chamber of Commerce, Banning Senior Center, Banning Community Center, U.S. Post Office, and various other shopping and school locations within the community. 11 Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California Seririnm= Sovtlsersa and Morttmersm =animism= 'MEG: 931--1122-3243 sth t wair.an Trams. Slate., • MIMEO _.o DIEM Sam ree.g..a..nro s+o a+eal 8tist wil`n 1St _? fE_ nlhetg.enrs/ic..mrt nsfer m �cutes Legend Map not to scale III III Tense and for Transfer Point Transfer Point San .-oigoni t.•:3rd w Cher -Its, H a Banning Pass Transit fixed route service hours are as follows: Days Hours Monday — Friday Monday - Friday Monday - Friday Saturday & Sunday Route 1 Route 5 Cabazon Circulator All Routes 4:30 A.M. — 11:00 P.M. 6:00 A.M. — 7:00 P.M. 8:00 A.M. — 6:00 P.M. 8:00 A.M. — 6:00 P.M. Banning Pass Transit offers limited service hours, 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., on the following holidays: Martin Luther King Day, President's Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, and the day after Thanksgiving. Banning Pass Transit offers no service on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. All aforementioned fixed routes are consistently monitored and will be modified as needed to better serve unmet transit needs. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 2.2 — Dial -A -Ride Service Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride is a service offered to seniors, aged 60 and older, persons with disabilities and passengers eligible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Limited service hours are available for non-ADA passengers. This category of passenger is also required to fill out a certification application to determine eligibility. If these terms are met, the applicant will receive a card certifying their eligibility to ride. Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride is a service offered within the city limits of Banning and Beaumont as well as within a % mile boundary of Routes 1 and 2 service areas (including Cabazon). The primary uses for the Dial -A -Ride system is for transportation to medical appointments, workshop programs for persons with disabilities, shopping areas, employment, and include connections to the Riverside Transit Agency and Pass Transit Fixed Routes. Hours for the Dial -A -Ride program are as follows: Days Ho Seniors (age 60 & older) & Persons without ADA Certificate Monday - Friday Saturday & Sunday Persons with ADA Certificate Monday - Friday Saturday & Sunday 2.3 — Key Performance Indicators 8:00 A.M. — 3:00 P.M. No Service 7:00 A.M. — 7:00 P.M. Limited service when three or more persons request service. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) has adopted a Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) for the transit and commuter rail operators of Riverside County. The PIP sets forth efficiency and effectiveness standards that the transit operators are to meet. Progress towards these standards is reported quarterly to the Commission The following table on the next page shows the operating performance indicators adopted in the PIP and this plan's projections for the coming year. 13 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Banning Transit System/Pass Transit Performance Measures Banning Transit System / FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Audited Actual Projected Planned Pass Transit (Based on 3rd Quarter Actuals) Performance Statistics Unlinked Passenger Trips 147,747 156,053 138,641 199,050 Operating Cost per Revenue $81.02 $92.31 $62.46 $85.93 Hours Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.68% 11.32% 12.61 % 11.7% Subsidy per Passenger $7.24 $8.19 $7.86 $7.39 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.84 $3.22 $3.08 $3.42 Subsidy per Revenue Hour $70.75 $81.86 $54.59 $75.81 Subsidy per Revenue Mile $3.13 $3.57 $2.24 $4.84 Passengers per Revenue Hour 9.8 10.0 6.90 10.3 Passengers per Revenue Mile 0.43 0.44 0.28 0.65 The FY 2014/15 projections are based on operating data through March 2015 and projected through June, 2015. Since these are only estimates, the performance indicators are subject to change. For Fiscal Year 2015/16, the Banning Transit System expects to be in compliance with at least 4 of the 7 performance targets. Additional details on key indicators for demand responsive and fixed route services are shown in Table 2. The Banning Transit System does not receive any federal funding and is not required to report to the National Transit Database. 2.4 - Productivity Improvement Efforts In order to meet performance standards, routes are continually monitored and analyzed to insure that the service being provided runs as efficiently as possible. Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California Banning Pass Transit completed a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) with Transportation Management & Design, Inc. in May of 2014, resulting in route changes for the entire system. While the addition of the Cabazon Circulator route has been met with great success, the changes to Routes 5 and 6 have caused a significant decrease in ridership. The routes have been realigned to provide better service to residents of the City of Banning, with the implementation of changes to begin July, 2015. 2.5 — Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth over the next two years Major passenger trip destinations that the Banning Pass Transit services are the Albertsons Shopping Center, the 2" Street Marketplace in Beaumont, the Walmart Supercenter in Beaumont, the Banning Justice Center, San Gorgonio Pass Hospital, the Cabazon Outlet Stores, Desert Hills Premium Outlets and Casino Morongo and the Mt. San Jacinto College Pass Campus. There is a high demand for service to these destinations whether for employment, necessities or pleasure. 2.6 — Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs Passenger amenities include 170 sign posted bus stops, 15 bus shelters with solar lighting and information panels and trash receptacles, 8 benches, and 15 trash cans. All fixed route and Dial -A -Ride vehicles are equipped with security cameras and recording equipment. Two new fixed route buses have been ordered and are scheduled to be delivered and placed in service by July, 2015. Grant funds have been received for an additional 33' passenger coach which will be ordered in June of 2015. There are no additional current facility or amenity needs during the planning year. 3 Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 — Recent Service Changes As mentioned previously, there were service changes made in July of 2014; those changes were based upon recommendations that were made as a result of the COA. The changes that were made have not had the anticipated results, and thus, route changes are being made to improve service and increase ridership. The most significant change will be the realignment of Banning Route 1, which will no longer travel into Beaumont beyond the Walmart Shopping Center. Thirty minute service will still be available from Walmart to Casino Morongo, however, the additional Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California hour of service that is currently spent in the City of Beaumont will be spent operating on the Cabazon Circulator Route. The changes that are being made result in headways no greater than 60 minutes on any route and expanded service hours at the MSJC Pass Campus. Classes at the college campus end at 9:00p.m., while bus service in the area of the college stops at 7:00p.m., preventing students who rely on the bus from attending evening classes. ROUTE 7 For information: 951.922.3243 www.ci.banning.ca.us W.4 MART 11111111111111111111111111111111 ■EM. BVhHVh'G POi�CF �fAi __ &WONG POULTOvc PROPOSED ROUTE 1 Servicing Downtown Banning, Casino Morongo and Cabazon Q Siil..alild h..s snap Frartsrer po M HK]PONGOe n5i•YO SOA f65. a PASSTRANSIT Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California ROUTE 6 For information: 951.922.3243 www_ci.banning.ca.us 1111111111111111M I I I I I I, MM.. n zu wnuwwr ®0 i 1E GEr. Illart not:, rtale .uhnlWr, bias vrop r srer point PROPOSED ROUTE 6 Servicing Southern and Downtown Banning ,i rt wys. A VN 3 enceeu PASSTRANSIT ROUTE 5 1 For information: 957.922.3243 www.d.banning.ca.us _l Gimp Moo moe»seal .�cM1rvfWr2 tales srga F srerpont h'e I.H9rcr IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' 1111111/ MM.. PROPOSED ROUTE 5 Servicing Northern and Downtown Banning PASSTRANSIT Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 3.2 — Recommend Local and Express Route There are no additional local or express routes scheduled for this planning year. 3.3 — Marketing Plans and Promotions Efforts have been made to market the Pass Transit System over the past year and will continue in the coming year. These efforts include purchasing advertising on a map of the San Gorgonio Pass Area, distribution of route maps by delivery to the library, Chamber of Commerce, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Mt. San Jacinto Pass Campus, local hotels and other businesses. The following marketing efforts will be undertaken to promote ridership growth. 1. Continue outreach programs to schools and at community events. 2. Attend senior community meetings to provide information. 3. Participation in the MSJC GO -PASS Program to encourage ridership of college students. 4. Articles in local papers highlighting new transportation routes. 5. Coordinate Travel Training through RTA. 6. Offer "Rider Appreciation Day" to raise awareness of benefits of public transportation. The City of Banning's website at www.ci.banning.ca.us provides basic Pass Transit route and schedule information, as well as links to route information for neighboring agencies. Customers can submit comments, complaints, concerns and suggestions through the city website. Operate service in a manner that will maximize system productivity, efficiency, as well as the use of subsidies. • Develop an ongoing planning process with key agencies and organizations within in the region. • Ensure that services are operated in a manner to maximize safety, to the riders, the public and the operators. • Develop a core group of services that connect key activity points and commit to providing service along those corridors. • Continually review all services to evaluate the efficiency and needs of the transit system. 18 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 3.4 — Budget Impact on Proposed Changes The changes that are proposed will have minimal impact on the budget, as the realignment will not result in additional buses in service and the distance traveled will be close to the same as currently being driven. 4 FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 — Operating and Capital Budget For FY 15/16 operating funds needed to operate the Banning Pass Transit System are $1,666,675 for the Fixed Route and DAR. The operating funds consist of $1,469,748 local transportation funds (LTF). The projected farebox revenue for FY 15/16 is $196,427. Additional funding in the amount of $500 will come from interest income. In an effort to increase efficiencies in service, the requested funds will allow for the conversion of full-time equivalent hours to one full-time driver position and additional part-time hours allotted to maintain the proposed route changes. Additionally, requested funds will be used for positions that have been created through a reorganization of the transit division of the Community Services Department. A Management Analyst position will replace a previously funded Transit Manager position and a new structure of office support will provide increased dispatch and customer service hours. The new organizational structure will allow for succession planning that is currently non-existent. Staff will continue to complete previously funded Capital projects in FY 15/16 and will continue to operate service in a manner that will maximize system productivity and efficiency. 4.2 — Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program Capital projects are funded through STA funds, Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program and Proposition 1 B Security grants for Banning Pass Transit. 4.3 — Regulatory and Compliance Requirements The City of Banning submitted an Americans with Disabilities Act Paratransit Plan to the FTA on January 26, 1992. Pass Transit fixed route buses are equipped with ADA compliant mobility device lifts and are accessible to persons with disabilities. A Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California procedure is in place to provide service to a customer in a mobility device should a fixed route bus lift fail. Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride services provide ADA complementary paratransit service for the fixed route services operated by Banning Transit System. Beaumont Transit System offers the same service through its Pass Transit Dial -a -Ride operation. The system uses a self -certification process with professional verification. Banning Transit System staff processes ADA certifications for Pass Transit operations. Title VI Banning Transit System/Pass Transit does not utilize federal funds for operating expenses. As such, Title VI requirements do not currently apply to the transit system. Alternatively Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policy) Pass Transit fixed -route buses are CNG powered. Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride vehicles (which are less than 33,000 lbs. GVW and 15-passenger capacity), administrative and driver relief vehicles are gasoline -powered. Future vehicle purchases will be in compliance with the RCTC and South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) policies regarding alternative fuel transit vehicles. The CNG Fueling Station at the City of Banning Corporation Yard provides expanded CNG capacity and fast fueling capability. With increased capacity and redundant compressor units, having adequate and reliable CNG pumping capacity will not be an issue in the foreseeable future. 20 Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California IiN i [wn l.a,pyinim Lamm* Bus (Motorbus) / Directly Operated Table 1- Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan City of Banning Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg, Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 2009 CMD Malibu 5 0 HG 1 0 17,115 19,748 19,748 2001 EDN Transmadc 33 1 35 CN 1 0 493,990 39,821 39,821 2004 EDN Transmark 33 2 35 CN 2 0 745,227 790,390 395,195 2010 EDN XHF 3i 2 34 CN 2 0 302,399 373,373 186,687 2002 HRD Ranger 2 0 12 GA 1 0 65,297 68,305 68,305 2003 FRD Ranger 2 0 12 GA 1 0 61,820 67,116 67,116 2010 FRD Ranger 2 0 GA 1 0 38,122 47,662 47,662 Totals: 11M1� t.ak r,.p k•we e. 108 5 9 Demand Response / Directly Operated 0 1,723,970 i,406,415 156,268 Table 1- Fleet Inventory FY 2015/15 Short Range Transit Plan City of Banning Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Friel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 2014//5 FY 2014/15 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 2010 LK Aerotech 16 25 GA. 0 56,811 68,075 68,075 2010 ESC EDN 16 1 25 GA 1 0 58,950 69,661 WAN 2001 FIN Aerotech 12 1 25 GA 0 263,329 282,347 282,347 2003 NON Aerotech 12 1 25 GA 1 0 246,481 268,956 268,9% 2013 GLV Universal 18 1 RJ 0 4,383 4,104 9,104 7008 777 Ford 14 1 hi GA 1 0 82,841 ] 22,i1PA 172,084 Totals: 88 6 0 I12,/95 840,227 136, 105 Illllr Ems - rihr9dr rw.y Yaywnrim Orime'im Table 2 -- City of Banning -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015 f 16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,224,988 $1,441,837 $1,258,431 $935,700 $1,666,675 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $155,315 $163,258 $131,1333 $117,983 $196,427 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,069,672 $1,278,579 $1,126,593 $817,716 $1,470,248 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 147,747 156,052 195,054 103,981 199,050 Passenger Miles 376,766 397,168 503,226 265,846 429,295 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Hours (a) 15,119.1 15,619.0 15,238.0 14,979.7 19,395.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 341,759.2 358,093.8 247,475.0 365,367.9 303,922.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 349,489.2 365,853.4 255,712.0 374,893.4 314,537.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $81.02 $92.31 s82.59 $62.46 $85.93 Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.68% 11.32% 10.47% 12.61% 11.78% Subsidy per Passenger $7.24 $8.19 $5.78 $7.86 $7.39 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.84 $3.22 $2.24 $3.08 $3.42 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $70.75 $81.86 $73.93 $54.59 $75.81 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.13 $3.57 $4.55 $2.24 $4.84 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 9.8 10.0 12.8 6.9 10.3 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.43 0.44 0.79 0,28 0,65 (a) Train Hours For Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. ueid a2ued �aouS Miff MEP tlNmdt (Nor hrapa ldion (Amm al Table 2 -- Banning -BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY2012/1.3 Audited FY2013/14 Audited FY2014/15 Plan FY2014/15 3rdQtrActual FY2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet - 4 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,085,763 s1,324,565 $1,099,734 1,848,622 $1,501,700 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $137,841 $142,845 $115,933 $105,440 $182,427 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $947,922 $1,181,719 5983,$ 1 $743,182 $1,319,273 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 138,503 146, iS1 133,959 96,862 188,000 Passenger Miles 343,487 364,513 463,331 240,218 389,100 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 13,877.2 14,401.5 12,853.0 13,982.0 17,010.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 316,380.2 333,784.8 200,901a) 343,965.9 257,347.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 321,592.2 339,272.4 204,460.0 351,022.4 263,285,n Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour 573 24 $91.97 $85.56 $60.69 $88 28 Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.70% 10.78% 10.54% 12.42% 12.14% Subsidy per Passenger $6.84 $8.114 $5.35 $7.57 $7.02 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.76 $3.24 $2.12 $3.1)9 $3.39 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $68.31 $82.06 $76.54 $53.15 $77.56 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (h) $3.00 $3.54 $4.90 $2.16 $5.13 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 10.0 1(1.2 14.3 6.9 11.1 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.44 n.44 0.92 0.28 0.73 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles For Rail Modes. ueid a2ued �aouS llllllll� MINE lirn+d� toy 11.epMwiw iaiera:n Table 2 -- Banning -BAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY2012/13 Audited FY2013/14 Audited FY 2014r15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet _ Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $139,225 $117,272 $158,697 $87,077 $164,975 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $17,474 $20,412 $15,900 $12,543 $14,000 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $121, 751 $96,860 S 142, 797 574, 534 5150,975 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger -nips 9,241 9,071 11,095 7,119 11,050 Passenger Miles 33,278 32,656 39,895 25,628 39,895 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 1,242.0 1,217.5 2,385.0 997.7 2,385.0 Tani Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 25,379.0 24,309.0 46,575.0 21,402.0 46,575.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 27,897.0 26,586.0 51,252.0 23,871.0 51,252.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $112.10 $96.32 $66.54 $87.28 $69,17 Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.55% 17.41% 10.0I°6 14.40% 8.48% Subsidy per Passenger $13.17 $10.68 $12.87 $10.47 $13.66 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.66 $2.97 $3.58 $2.91 $3,78 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $98.03 $79.56 $59.87 $74.70 $63.30 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.80 $3.98 $3.07 $3.48 $3.24 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 7.4 7.5 4.7 7.1 4.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.36 0.37 0.24 0.33 0.24 !al Train Hours for Rail Modes. fbl Car Miles for Rail Modes. ueid a2ued �aouS ZiL'l40$ LZtr'96iS 6£i'itreTS O'LabE ON'TEE O'OLE'ZZ 01511Z a'O179 OSZ'TSZ sinDi aapooad anNa5 SL6'OSI$ OUO'bi$ SL6$93 OZSZ'IS O'S15'9b OVA'? OUCZ S68'6E BOIT Z dnEaM ava-VV8 968'OS£$ Oi0'Z£$ 958'Z83 O'Otri'69 O'OS9'S9 0'506'£ 0'96e£ SZI'Z6 OSAE I PA1 9-W3 TTVZSE$ L90'9£$ 8[V ES 0'5611ZS 0179b'ZS O'S06'£ 0'96L'£ Sag OSE'trS I Poi S-1M OSb'069$ 0E1'43 HMS O'OLE1641 O'80S'94I O'OOL'TI O'OtII OinE OOO'66T Z Poi i-!NVB ApiscrnS laH anuanaa }soa sa{iW SgPI sanoH &mo41 siaboassed s;i:v aa6uassed Gugeaada leiol anuaeay 1E14 anuanaa aa0uassed lead atlhl Aga *molt Samoa llv 9T/STOZ,Li -- buiLillee Jo 43 531,151145 alnol C NFL Short Range Transit Plan spauia13 qea Wills l wpcfuc.l * Fagt ��111111 9C'0 6'TT 9914 WEL$ IVZ$ ST'9$ 9o8Z'TT £6'9$ 9Z'S$ OE78$ SEejO1Jappm oHaas bZ'O 91, 1,Z'£$ 0£'E9$ EL'£$ 99'ET$ %817'8 £61.1$ bs'ES LF69$ AENKIM NC}N78 9S'O C6 t'E'S$ EliM$ NT$ 6'6$ %9E'8 WOO E8'ES %'OOT$ IBA! 9-N48 40'T E'iT ZL'9$ 1'Z6$ 6S7$ W9$ %8Z'6 ST'L$ Otr'LS fiEZOIS IE101 5-N78 69'0 Ell ST'b$ 9L'T9$ S8'T$ E9b$ %0EVE WS$ ES'I7S 66'it$ IBA! Ma al!NJad anoHJad al!W moil aliW saaGuassed soMssed aiouana l anuanay aaGuassed Jad hpI51111g Jad Apogns Jad Apogn5 aaGuassed MET Jad hpogns Faanunab xogaae j JaGuassed apw anuanay JnoH anumq Jed 150) aad 150o Jad Tso) Guneaado Gugeaadti adj. dea # agnog sa�naa IIU 9T/STOZ M T -- Guiutie8 ja All) Saig e4..5 ahoy dl dS • E a19el Short Range Transit Plan smin pui a31.1eueJ011ad !smug).a061.1 iariap�„� NENMI 26 Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California Fixed Route Description Area/ Site Service Route 1 Service from Beaumont to Cabazon via downtown Banning Walmart Shopping Center, Albertsons, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Downtown Banning, Banning Justice Center, Casino Morongo, Desert Hills Outlet, Cabazon Community Center and residential areas of Cabazon Route 5 Residential areas of Northern Banning to Walmart Shopping Center in Beaumont Banning City Hall, Fox Cineplex, the Banning Library, Banning Community Center, Banning Justice Center, Post Office, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, shopping areas and restaurants at Highland Springs Route 6 Residential areas of Southern Banning, Hathaway and Williams Street to Walmart Shopping Center in Beaumont via downtown Banning Mt San Jacinto College Pass Campus, Banning High School, Smith Correctional Facility, Banning Justice Center, shopping areas and restaurants at Highland Springs Dial -A -Ride City -Wide Demand response / reservation based service for seniors and disabled City-wide, neighboring areas of Beaumont and Cabazon City of Banning FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1B (PTiVtISEA) Prop 'E Securr.-. r Seasure A Fare Box Other{21 FY 15116 Operating Assistance $1,666,675 $1,469,748 $196,427 $500 Subtotal: Operating $1,666,675 $1,469,748 $D $0 $u =_ $196,427 $500 Replacement Coach - Prop 1B FY 14115 15-0'1 $253,596 $253,596 Wireless Communication Download System Prop 1B -Security FY 14115 15-02 $19,189 $19,189 Subtotal: Capital $272,785 w2 $0 $253,596 $19,189 $o Total: Operating & Capital $1,939,46o S1.469.748 $o $253.596 S19,189 SO S196 427 WO Note: Other (2) is from Interest Income ueid a2ued �aouS Zsr Ce Sa] =r; f.1? Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: 15-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement Coach — Prop 1 B FY 14/15 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Replacement of 35' coach powered by Compressed Natural Gas PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funding has been acquired to replace two 2001 El Dorado Coaches which have exceeded their useful life. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Begin Vehicle Order: June 2015 End Vehicle Order: July 2015 Delivery of Vehicles: July 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) FY 2014/15 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: 15-02 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Wireless Communication Download System — Security Prop 1 B PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Installation of a Wireless WIFI Communications system to allow automatic storage of video and audio files from all fixed route buses and dial -a -ride vehicles in the Banning Pass Transit Fleet. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Having footage automatically downloaded and stored eliminates the need to remove hard drives for data retrieval, which virtually eliminates the chance for loss of recorded footage. The installation of a wireless communications system will dramatically increase the reliability of recovering recorded footage, thus enhancing passenger safety and reducing the possibility of fraudulent and insurance related claims. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Begin Equipment Order: May 2015 End Equipment Order: July 2015 Delivery and Installation Complete: September 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Prop 1 B Cal EMA FY 2014/15 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) Crt} of Banning FY 2416/17 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 Project description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LT STA Prap1B (PT MISEA) Prop1B Security MeasureA Fare Box Other''f FY 2016/1T 0 perating Assistan ce $1,314,070 $1,614,724 $198,856 $544 Subtotal: Operating 51,810.07v $1,614,720 ,. ,, 50 $193,356 $544 Subtotal: Capital .,. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital S1.810.070 S1,610,720 SO $0 $0 SO S198,850 S500 Note: Other (2) is from Interest Income ueid a2ued �aouS Revised 5112+2015 Summary ofFY2016/17 t� Funds Requested.xls CLI =I, 2 City of Banning FY 2017/18 SummaryafFundsRequested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017f18 Project Description Capital Project Number (1] Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop1B (PTMISEA} Prop1B Security MeasrreA Fare Box Other FY2017/180peratingAssistance $1,869,903 51,670,745 $198,658 $500 Subtotal: Operating 31,369,943 51,670,745 $4 $4 =C SO 5158.658 $500 Subtotal: Capital se $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating $ Capital S1.869.903 S1.670.745 SO $0 $0 SO S198,658 8500 Note: Other C2) s frcm Interest Income Revised 541212015 Summary ofFY2017f18 Funds Requested.xts ueid a2ued �aouS Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California TABLE 6 — PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Audit Recommendations (Covering FY 2009/10 — FY 2011/12) Action(s) Taken And Results 1. Consider purchasing dispatching and scheduling software program Staff is currently in the process of reviewing software programs for dispatching and scheduling. Purchase and implementation will be complete by August, 2015. 2. Provide Cross Training Opportunities for City Opportunities for City Transit Administrative Staff The Transit Department has been reorganized to allow for cross training of the dispatch and operations. In addition, a Transit Analyst position has been developed and will allow for succession planning at the management level. 3. Update Local Bus Schedules to show connectivity with Other Transit Services New Bus Schedules have been designed and show connecting bus services and transfer points to and from Banning Transit with other transit providers. 4. Provide Weblink from Banning Transit to Beaumont Transit A Weblink to Beaumont Transit is now available on Banning Transit's website. MIN r: nhr�t Irma Iwy$Ivion 6vmumm Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Banning Data Elements FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 183,959 Passenger Miles 463,331 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 12,853.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 200,900.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 204r466.0 Total Operating Expenses $1,099,734 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $115,933 Net Operating Expenses 1983,801 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 10.54%I >= 1100% I 12.61%'Meets Target Discretionary: 1.Operating Cost Per Revenue Hou $85.56 <= $82.34 $62.46 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $5.35 >= $6.00 and <= $8.12 $7.86 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger We $2.12 >_ $2.36 and <= $3.20 $3.08 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $76.54 >= $60.46 and <= $81.80 $54.59 Better Than Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.90 >= $2.63 and <= $3.55 $2.24 Better Than Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 14.30 >= 8.59 and <=11.62 6.90 Fails to Meet Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.92 >= 0.37 and <= 0.51 0.28 Fails to Meet Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators ueid a2ued �aouS CC 2 ia] =r; it cvtr,di tansy ire tomselk.n FY 2015/16 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; City of Banning All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2013j14 End of Year Actual FY 2014/15 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2015/16 Plan FY 2015/16 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 156,052 103,981 199,050 None Passenger Miles 397,168 265,846 429,295 None Revenue Hours 15,619.0 14,979.7 19,395.k) None Total Hours 17,159.4 16,243.3 20,370.0 None Revenue Miles 358,093.8 365,367.9 303,922.n None Total Miles 365,858.4 374,893.4 314,537.o None operating Costs 0,441,837 $935,7i31 $1,666,675 None Passenger Revenue $163,258 $117,983 $196,427 None operating Subsidy $1,278,579 $817,716 $1,470,248 None operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $92.31 $62.46 $85.93 <= $63.u6 Fails to Meet Target operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $4.03 $2.56 $5.48 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $9.24 $9.00 $8.37 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.32% 12.61% 11.78% >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $8.19 $7.86 $7.39 >= $6.68 and <= $9.04 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $3.22 $3.08 $3.42 >= $2.62 and <= $3.54 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $81.86 $54.59 $75.81 >= $46.411 and <= $62.78 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $3.57 $2.24 $4.84 >= $1.9n and <= $2.58 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 10.00 6.90 1u.30 >= 5.87 and <= 7.94 Better Than Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile n.44 n.28 0.65 >= 0.24 and <= 0.32 Better Than Target a] The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2015/15 Plan to the FY 21115i16 Primary Target. ueid a2ued �aouS 35 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California The City of Banning TABLE 9 - HIGHLIGHTS OF 2015/16 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN ■ Realignment of Routes 1, 5 and 6 to provide increased service within the City of Banning ■ Adjust times of Routes 1 and 6 to meet the demand presented by the growth of the Mt. San Jacinto Pass Campus ■ Purchase additional equipment for camera system to enable wireless download of footage from Fixed -Route and Dial -a -Ride vehicles ■ Purchase and implement use of a software system for scheduling and dispatching Dial - a -Ride to improve productivity ■ Purchase and install auto display and enunciator equipment in fixed route fleet ■ Continue working with the City of Beaumont staff regarding the coordination of routes, schedules, passenger amenities, and fares to ensure that Pass Transit is seamless and offers an ease of use to Pass Area residents, while still maintaining the best service possible within our service area Table 9A BANNING TRANSIT SYSTEM/PASS TRANSIT FY 2011/12 Audited FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Estimate (Based 3r Quarter Actuals) FY 2015/16 Planned System -wide Ridership 136,563 147,747 156,052 138,641 199,050 Operating Cost Per Revenue Hours $86.53 $81.02 $92.31 $62.46 $85.93 36 Short Range Transit Plan city of BANNING California Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2013/14 Audit FY 14/15 (Estimate) FY 15/16 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 163,258 157,310 196,427 2. Interest - 500 500 3. General Fund Supplement - - - 4. Measure A - - - 5. Advertising Revenue - - - 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets - - - 7. CNG Revenue - - - 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - - - 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - - - 10. Investment Income - - - 11. CalPers CERBT - - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - - - 13. Other Revenues - - - TOTAL REVENUE 163,258 157,810 196,927 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1,441,840 1,441,837 1,544,712 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 11% 11% 13% PASSTRANSIT City of Beaumont SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2015/16 - FY 2017/18 1 FINAL DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents CHAPTER 1- SYSTEM OVERVIEW 3 POPI I AT7ONT PROFILEAND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJEC77O S 3 RIDERS/ IIP DEMOGRAPHICS 4 FrxED Rol TM TRANSI'TSERVICES 6 PARAT RANSTT SERVICES ICES 6 REGIONAL EXPRESS Br 'S SER I UCE.. 7 Cr'RRI iNT FARE Snit WIT 'RE 7 PROPOSED FARE STRUM 'RE 8 FLEET 10 FACILITIES 10 CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 11 FIX1sD Rot 773 SERY7CE 11 COMM 77:R LINK SER17CE 12 DIALA-RIDE SERVICE 13 KEY' PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 13 M-VOR TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROlYT 14 EQI'IPAIENT,PASSENGER AMENITIES ANDFACILI7YNEEDS 14 CHAPTER 3 - PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 15 RECOMMENDED SER1-7CE CIIANGES 15 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTIONS 15 BI'DGET IMPACT ON PROPOSED CHANGES 17 CHAPTER 4 - FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 17 OPERATINC AND CAPITAL. Br'DGET 17 FINDING PLANS TO SI TPORT PROPOSED OPERATING AND CAPT1 AL PROGRAM.. , 17 REGI IATORYAND COMPLIANCE RE:Q IREMENIS 17 2 CHAPTER 1- SYSTEM OVERVIEW The Pass Transit System is the result of a cooperative effort between the city of Banning (Banning Municipal Transit System) and the city of Beaumont (Beaumont Municipal Transit Agency). The Pass Transit System consists of two independent, but well coordinated, transit systems. The coordinated service area of Pass Transit includes the cities of Banning, Beaumont and Calimesa, the unincorporated areas of Cabazon and Cherry Valley, and the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians Reservation, approximately 40 square miles. Both fixed route and dial -a -ride services are provided throughout the service area. A Memorandum of Understanding was developed to allow each city's Dial -A -Ride services to cross jurisdictional boundary lines so that a passenger did not have to transfer. A new joint Rider's Guide was developed, combined transfers and ten -ride ticket books were printed, buses and bus stop signs were decaled `Pass Transit,' and fares were established to be the same for the convenience of riders. For purposes of this Short Range Transit Plan, we will focus specifically on Beaumont's Municipal Transit System. There are three major thoroughfares passing through the Pass Area including Interstate 10, State Highway 60, and Route 79. Major employers within the area include the newly renovated Banning Courthouse, Casino Morongo, Desert Hills Premium Outlets, Lowe's Distribution Center, Icon Distribution Center, Beaumont Unified School District, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Loma Linda University Highland Springs Medical Plaza, 2nd Street Marketplace, which includes the WalMart Supercenter, and several manufacturing companies_ Within the service area of Beaumont Transit are six elementary schools, two middle schools, one high school, one alternative high school, one adult education school, one private school, and two charter schools. Two 55 plus communities and various mobile home parks are also served by Beaumont Transit, oftentimes providing a vital link to necessary medical services at the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, as well as Beaver Medical Group, Loma Linda Medical Offices, Rancho Paseo Medical Group, and Davita Dialysis Center. In addition, Beaumont Transit also provides transportation to two food banks, two local group homes, and a number of churches in the community. Transportation to regional services outside our service area includes the San Bernardino Metrolink and the VA Hospital located in Loma Linda. A free shuttle will run for the annual Cherry Festival to provide seniors, those with disabilities, and low income patrons free transportation to these events. Population Profle and Demographic Projections The latest available statistics from the California Department of Finance show residential population within Beaumont had a 4 percent increase from January 2014 (40,853) to January 2015 (42,481), making it one of the top 15 fastest growing cities in the state and fastest growing city in Riverside County. The unincorporated area of Cherry Valley had a population of 6,362 residents in 2010. In 2008 and 2010, Beaumont was named the second fastest growing city in the state of California with a 224 percent increase from 2000 to 2010. This coincides with Riverside County being the fastest growing county in the state in 2010 with a 42 percent increase over the year 2000. 3 The 2010 census indicated that the Beaumont community is ethnically diverse with a makeup of: Caucasian (63%), Hispanic (40%), Black (6)/0), Asian and Pacific Islander (8%), and all other races (16%). Senior citizens (age 65 and older) make up 11 percent of the population, indicating a potential for growth in the demand for Dial -A -Ride services and a slight growth in Fixed Route services. Youth (age 18 and under) also make up a substantial portion of the population (30 percent). The 2010 census showed the median household income within Beaumont was $67,758, above the national average of $53,046. Furthermore, it's estimated the average home price in 2013 was $226,000 noting a high percentage of two -income families and a much higher median household income than reported at the 2010 census. Normally, this would translate to less of a need for transit services today than in previous years on much of Beaumont's system; however, with 56 percent of ridership being youth passengers and the absence of school -provided transportation for the middle schools and high schools, we have seen a substantial increase in the need for transit services. Finally, it is important to note, Beaumont's Route 1 stretches into Cabazon and the city of Banning, where 19 percent of households are below poverty level, according to the estimated 2010 demographics, indicating the presence of a number of transit dependent individuals specifically on that route. Ridership Demographics This section provides demographic information that shows Beaumont Transit's passenger profile including the gender, age, ethnicity, and income of the riders. Data available is from ridership surveys taken from 2013. The average age of riders is 21 years of age. The majority of riders are female (fifty-six percent). Seventy-two percent of the riders are under 18 years of age. Finally, ten percent of riders are over 50 years of age. The ethnic distribution of riders shows that a majority are Hispanic or Black with twenty-seven percent of the ridership being Caucasian. Ridership Ethnicity Black/African American 15% 1Alr��� 1 4 Eighteen percent of the riders are of working age (19 to 50). Nineteen percent of riders are employed either full or part time. Fifty-six percent are high school or younger students, while five percent are college students. Retirees make up five percent of the ridership while the unemployed and homemakers are nineteen percent of total ridership. Finally, a new demographic we are now tracking is the Armed Forces Veterans, which make up two percent of our ridership. Ridership Employment Status 60% 50% 40 % 30% 20% z0 % -- Q �Jbe' OA? 01 a<� 0" e�`�6 K..�1 ��� e e In evaluating the demographics of our general passengers and excluding youth passengers data, we've found income levels of our bus riders are low with seventy-four percent making less than $25,000 annually. General passengers are also transit dependent and fifty-five percent do not have an operating vehicle available at their household. Approximately fifty-eight percent of the general passengers do not currently hold a drivers license. It should be noted that of the riders that do own a vehicle, thirty-three percent of those ride the bus because driving is too expensive. With the elimination of school bus transportation for the local middle schools and high schools, Beaumont Transit has seen a large increase in youth passengers. At this time, youth ridership makes up over fifty percent of total passengers. As Beaumont Unified continues to decrease transportation opportunities, it is expected that youth passenger numbers will continue to rise. 5 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Ridership Household Income (Excluding youth passenger data) h40 �g°) g� x °� 073 a 1, q, '1�„ tea �h aOp QO+ ''�hOOp, �Op�O Q16)' ra F,rared Route Transit Services Beaumont Transit operates six fixed routes and one Commuterlink. Operating hours are as follows: Fixed route service hours are: Monday — Friday Saturday and Sunday 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Limited service (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) is provided on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday, Presidents' Day, Columbus Day, Veterans' Day, and the day after Thanksgiving Day. No service is provided on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Current ridership trends indicate peak hours are in the early morning and late afternoon, when youth passengers ride more frequently. In previous years, youth ridership was non-existent; however, currently it makes up over 50 percent of the monthly ridership. Route 1 exhibits continued growth and trends indicating the majority of passengers are now using this route to get to work in Cabazon. General passengers continue to use Beaumont Transit to get to and from work. Senior and Disabled passenger trends indicate they use transit for shopping and errands. Parattansit Services Dial -A -Ride provides service to senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for complementary paratransit service under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Service hours for the Dial -A -Ride service are: Elderly and Disabled without ADA certification Monday through Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Persons with ADA Complementary Paratransit Certification (with 24-hour registration) 6 Monday through Friday 6.00 a.m. to 7.00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. It should be noted, the Beaumont Transit system does provide its residents and the residents of Cherry Valley with dial -a --ride service into and from Banning. Limited service (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m_) is provided on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday, Presidents Day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, and the day after Thanksgiving Day. No service is provided on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. Ridership trends indicate Dial -A -Ride services are increasing in demand. The addition of a third bus during peak hours is needed in order to service all ADA passengers. In previous years, Dial -A -Ride passengers used the service primarily for shopping trips and errands. Current trends have shown an increase in usage for medical appointments, primarily to the dialysis center that is centrally located in Beaumont. Regional Express Bus Service Two years ago, Beaumont Transit introduced the Commuterlink 120 to provide transportation from the Pass Area, including Calimesa, to both the San Bernardino Metrolink and the VA Hospital in Loma Linda. This route has been in demand exponentially and Saturday service is being added in July 2015 due to high demand. Additionally, passengers can use Day Passes to transfer between the Pass Transit System fixed routes and the RTA Line 31 to Hemet and Line 35 to Moreno Valley. The RTA Line 210 continues to operate as a connection between the Pass Area and the city of Riverside. In 2012, Sunline introduced Commuter Link 220. This route was created to help connect the eastern desert region to the city of Riverside. In 2013, Pass Transit moved its Morongo Casino bus stop to the Commuter Link 220 and Amtrak bus stop located on the casino property to ease passenger transfers between the agencies. Both the 210 and the 220 offer connections to the Metrolink trains traveling from Riverside to Los Angeles and Orange County. Current Fare Structure The current fixed route fare is $1.15 per one-way trip for general passengers. Youth passengers pay $1.00 per one-way trip. The fare is $.65 per one-way trip for senior citizens, persons with disabilities and military veterans. Active military personnel and GoPass holders ride all routes free of charge. Passengers under 46" in height pay $.25. Ten -ride ticket books are offered for $10.35 each; senior citizens and persons with disabilities can purchase the books at a reduced cost of $5.85 per 10-ride book. Fixed Route day passes are sold for $3.00 each; senior citizens and persons with disabilities can purchase the passes for $1.80. Monthly passes are $36.00; youth passes are $30.00; senior citizens, persons with disabilities and military veterans are $21.50 each. In addition to those passes, a 10 tripper pass is offered for Dial -A -Ride, Fixed Route youth passengers, and ComrnutetLink 120 passengers at a rate of $18.00, $10.00 and $27.00, respectively. 7 Pass Area Transit Fare FIXED ROUTE Fare Categories FARES Base !care i pare exact drivers Day Pass fare reader cannot make 10-Tripper Punch Pass when bus arrives. change. N4 REfYNQS. 10-Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.D0 NIA $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades k-12) $1.00 NIA $10 00 N/A $30.00 Senior(ss+)• $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Disabled.. $.65 $1.80 N/A $5 85 $21.50 Military Veteran** $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Child (WW1 or under) GO Pass and **If you plan to use you board the bus. $.25 Attire a senior, disabled You must also show N/A N/A N/A N/A Militairg** I RIDE FREE ID each time or military discounted fare, you must show proper proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Dial -A -Ride FARES Have exact fare ready when bus arrives. Drivers cannot Snake change. NO REFUNDS. Fare Categories Base Fare 10-Ride Punch Card One -Way $2.00 $18.00 Companion $3-00 NIA Dial -A -Ride is a transportation service for ADA, disabled and active adults over 65 years of age. Reservations are required 24-hours in advance and may be made by calling (951) 769-8532. PCA (w/I.D.)** FREE FREE No Show $2.00 N/A Child (46" tall or under) $3.00 N/A **If you plan to use a PCA (Personal Care Atten- dant) free fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. COMMYTERlIM1� FARES Have exact fare ready when bus arrives. Drivers cannot make change. NO REFUNDS. Fare Categories Commuter Fare (Route 120) General $3.00 Youth (grades K-12) $3.00 Commuted 120 is a regional transportation service for all passengers. Connections may be made to Pass Transit fixed routes, RTA fixed routes and gSininigtetli .ks, suriLtme cgrata4et, inks, and Matroijd trains. Additional fares may apply. Senior (659— $2.00 Disabled— $2.00 Military Veteran'" $2.0o Child 06.tat! nr under) $2.00 **If you plan to use a senior or disabled dis- counted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper 4D-to-purchase-discounted parses/rackets, Active Military** I RUDE FREE Proposed Fare Structure Beaumont Transit proposes changes to the fare structure including allowing all Jurors summoned to serve in the Banning courthouse to ride free to and from the courthouse by showing their current and valid juror 1D badge. Beaumont Transit has seen a huge influx in GO Pass riders, averaging over 700 free rides per month. Due to the fact that Beaumont and Banning Transit do not have card readers to verify current enrollment, a new program will be implemented starting June 2015 to help eliminate misuse 8 by requiring students to obtain a current semester sticker from MSJC which will be visible on their student ID card. Beaumont Transit is also now limiting GO Pass riders to those attending MSJC only, Dial -A -Ride Fare Categories FARES Base Fare I : Nave exact Qrivers Cannot 10-Ride Punch Card fare ready when bus arrives. snake change, NO REFUNDS. Dial -A -Ride is a transportation service for ADA, disabled and active adults over 65 years of age. Reservations are required 24-hours in advance And may be made by calling (951) 769-8532. One -Way $2,00 $18.00 Companion $3.00 WA PCA (w/I.D.)** FREE FREE **If you plan to use a PCA (Persona! Care Atten- dant) free fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. No Show $2.00 NIA Child (46'tall or under) $3.00 NIA FIXED ROUTE Fare Categories FARES Base Fare Nave exact Drivers Day Pass fare ready cannot make 10-Tripper Punch Pass when bus arrives. change, NO REFUNDS. 10-Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 NIA $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades K-12) $1.00 NIA $10.00 N/A $30.00 Senior (85+)" $.65 $1.80 NIA $5.85 $21.50 Disabled- $.65 $1.80 NIA $5 85 $21.50 Military Veteran** $.65 $1.80 NIA $5.85 $21.50 Child (4a"tall or under) $ 25 WA N/A NIA NIA GO Pass and Active Miilitary*e 1 RIDE FREE **If you plan to use a senior, disabled or military discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. COMMYTERLIMfi FARES I Rave exact Drivers fare ready when bus arrives. cannot make change. NO REFUNDS. Fare Categories Commuter Fare (Route 120) Commuterlink 120 is a regional transportition service for all passengers. Connections may be made to Pass Transit fixed routes, RTA fixed General $3.00 routes and comrnuterldss, 501,ing gomr7utet- links, and Mars)link trains. Additional fares Youth (grades K-t2) $3,00 may apply. Senior (65+)" $2.00 **If Disabled" $2.00 you plan to use a senior or disabled dis- counted fare, you must show proper ID each time Military Veteran*' $2.00 you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to-puFchase-discouated-.passesitickets. Child (46" tail or under) $2.00 Active Military 1 RIDE FREE A youth scholarship program was created in January 2010 after Beaumont Transit was contacted by a local family and the school district seeking assistance in transporting two students from the Banning Midway area to Beaumont High School. Staff met with the family and agreed upon a series of transit related assignments to be performed and completed in exchange for monthly bus passes. 9 From that, a committee was formed to set criteria, receive applications, and monitor the progress of the :recipients. Council formally adopted the program starting with the FY 2013 school year. In July 2013, Beaumont Transit implemented a discounted fare to veterans and free fare to active military personnel in the Pass area. The Pass area has over 2,000 military personnel and we determined a growing need for transportation to and from employment and medical appointments. Beaumont Transit recently received a state grant allowing for a limited number of free rides for Veterans and will be issuing those tickets out as funding becomes available. This grant is through the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. As part of Riverside County Transportation Commission's (ROTC) program, Beaumont Transit continues to work with Trillium to provide up-to-date data for GoogleTransit. A link was added to the city's web page to aid passengers in planning their trips. Every year, the Beaumont community hosts a Cherry Festival in downtown Beaumont with record - breaking attendance, a Fourth of July extravaganza with live bands and a fireworks show, and summer Wednesday evenings concerts in the park. Beaumont Transit markets public transportation with free shuttles to and from the festival grounds and offers the shuttle to provide seniors, those with disabilities, and low income patrons free transportation to these events. Due to a decrease in demand, Beaumont Transit will be eliminating Route 40, the free shuttle to and from summer concerts for FY 2015. Fleet Characteristics Beaumont Transit operates twelve fixed route vehicles and one commuterlink. Four of the vehicles are Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)-powered, two are diesel -powered, and seven are gasoline powered. All are equipped with bicycle racks and ADA compliant with wheelchair lifts and tie - down stations. Four of the buses have audio announcement systems for the visually impaired. The transit system also operates three Dial -A -Ride vehicles. All are gasoline -powered. All of the vehicles are ADA compliant with wheelchair lifts and tie -down stations. A lead mechanic was hired in January 2015 to oversee the two vehicle mechanics. Since then, many new processes and procedures have been implemented to ensure that the fleet is completely up to date on service. The CNG buses are fueled at fueling stations located at the Beaumont Unified School District's transportation yard and at the city of Banning corporate yard. The fuelling stations are currently the only CNG stations in the Pass Area large enough to meet the transit system's demand. Beaumont Transit is currently working with Southern California Gas Company to explore locations to install a new CNG station. With one new CNG bus almost completed and two more being built, this new station would service Beaumont Transits growing CNG fleet, as well as be centrally located and open to the public. Beaumont Transit has received STA funding and other grant funding for this project and hopes to break ground by January, 2016. All buses are equipped with state of the art video surveillance systems and aides in reducing potential liability. Facilities Administrative services for Beaumont are provided by staff from various City of Beaumont departments with the majority of operations located at the Transit Services yard. All twelve 10 customer service staff and three police records staff throughout the city facilities are trained and well -versed in transit routes and fare structures to help the public with information and sales of fare media. In October 2013, Transit operations moved into Building D at the Civic Center campus located in downtown Beaumont. Moving the operations included more office space, a new phone system, modern facilities with better heating and air conditioning, a larger parking area for the buses with more security, and direct access to all other city departments. A Transit campus camera system was installed with 24/7 monitoring of the bus yard by Beaumont Police Department personnel. This has been a major deterrent to potential vandalism and criminal activity. All customer service type functions, including bus passes, maps and schedules, and general transit information continue to be performed at the following locations with extended service hours at two of the locations: Beaumont Civic Center Hours: Monday through Thursday 5:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Friday 8:00 a.m. to Noon Beaumont Police Dept. Hours: Monday through Friday 7:00 .a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 7:00 a.m. to Noon Community Recreation Center Hours: Sunday through Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Responsibility for overall administration of the transit system is provided by the City Resources Director. Maintenance of the vehicles is provided by vehicle mechanics and will remain at the Transit yard. CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE Systemwide ridership for FY 2014 was 215,398 a record high for Beaumont Pass Transit and a 2.9 percent increase from FY 2013. Estimated ridership for FY 2015 is projected at 219,626 riders based on the first three quartets, a projected increase of almost 2 percent from FY 2014. Fixed Route Service Beaumont Pass Transit System operates eight fixed routes: Routes 1, 3, 3/4, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 17. Routes 3, 3/4, & 4 operate on a one -hour headway. Route 1 runs in conjunction with Banning Transit and operates on a 30-minute headway. Routes 7, 9, 11 & 17 offer limited services in the mornings and afternoons. Route 1- Beaumont to Cabazon Route 1 currently makes up 36 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 5981. This route operates on a 30-minute headway in conjunction with Banning Transit. Route 3 - Beaumont High to Wal-Mart via Sundance 11 Route 3 currently makes up 17 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 2902. This route operates on one -hour headway and serves the residential areas of Beaumont, north of the Interstate 10 (I-10) freeway. An additional bus is going to be added to accommodate for passenger increase during peak times in the morning and late afternoon. Route 4 - Downtown to Wal-Mart Route 4 currently makes up 10 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1743. This route operates on one -hour headway and serves downtown Beaumont and the residential areas of the city of Beaumont including a small portion south of I-10. Route 3/4 — Beaumont High to Wal-Mart Route 3/4 currently makes up 1.5% of total fixed route ridership with an average :monthly passenger trip count of 232/month. This route operates on a one -hour headway and serves downtown Beaumont, Wal-Mart, Sundance, and the Beaumont High School with a main goal of providing passengers from Cherry Valley with weekend transportation and links to downtown Beaumont. Route 7 - Tournament Hills/Fairway Canyon to Cherry Valley Route 7 currently makes up 19 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 3132. This route operates on half-hout headway between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. and again between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. This route has coordinating time points for passenger transfers with Routesl, 3, 4, and 9. Route 9 - Seneca Springs to Cherry Valley Route 9 currently makes up 8 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1269. This route operates on half-hour headway between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. and again between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. A tripper bus service was added to meet the growing demand of passengers on this route. This route has coordinating time points for passenger transfers with Routes 1, 3, 4, and 120. Route 11- Banning to Cherry Valley Route 11 currently makes up 2 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 357. This route interlines with Route 4 and operates on three-quarter hour headway between 6:30 a.m. and 7:20 a.m. Route 11 will be eliminated for FY 2016. Route 17 - Tournament Hills/Fairway Canyon to Cherry Valley Route 17 currently makes up .07 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 96. This route operates on half-hour headway between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.xn. and again between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 3:45 p.m. Route 17 will be eliminated for FY 2016. Route 40 - Summer Concert Series Shuttle Route 40 currently makes up .01 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 1.4. This route operates on a fifty -minute headway between 4:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. every concert Wednesday from July 4" through August 7`h. This route was created to assist seniors, disabled, and low-income riders by providing them free transportation to the free Summer Concert Series. Route 40 will be eliminated beginning July 2015. Commuter Link Service Route 120 12 Route 120 currently makes up 4 percent of total fixed route ridership with an average monthly passenger trip count of 622. We anticipate a continued increase in passenger trips in the coming year. This route operates on one and half-hour headway as a Commuter Link between the Pass Area and the San Bernardino Metrolink, with stops in Calimesa and the Loma Linda ETA Hospital. It will run between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Time points were created to specifically coincide with the Metrolink trains and transfers to RTA and OmniTrans. Route 120 ridership has doubled year -year and it is anticipated that growth will continue. Saturday service will be added during peak times due to high demand. Dial -A Ride Service Dial -A -Ride currently averages 1626 passenger nips per month. Dial -A -Ride operates on a reservation system. Passengers are asked to call at least 24-hours in advance to schedule a pick-up. Due to increased demand from ADA passengers, a third bus will be added to assist during peak hours. Key Performance Indicators The Riverside County Transportation Commission adopted a Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) for transit and commuter rail operators of Riverside County. The PIP sets forth efficiency and effectiveness standards that the transit operators are to meet. Progress towards these standards is reported quarterly to the Commission. Table $ shows the operating performance indicators adopted in the PIP and this plan's projections for FY 2015/16. Productivity Improvement Efforts Beaumont Pass Transit made a significant effort to improve productivity in the last two fiscal years and will continue to do so in the future, as evident by passenger increase. From FY 09 to FY 13, there has been a 53 percent increase in passenger trips. Such notable improvements include fiscal responsibility, increasing passenger fares to meet increased operational costs for transit services, more efficient data compilation, and combining staffing assignments to reduce personnel overhead. Beaumont is working diligently to increase youth ridership for elementary through college -level students. Effective July 1, 2011, the Beaumont Pass Transit began offering customer service type functions at three locations including: Beaumont Civic Center, Beaumont Police Department, and the Community Recreation Center. With the addition of two locations to serve the needs of the customers and the added benefit of operating hours early in the morning, later in the evening and over the weekend, it is anticipated there will be more effective communication with passengers and hope that Beaumont Transit will continue to grow. In addition to added hours, Beaumont Transit also added a GPS locating system. All passengers can access real-time bus locations through their smart phones, tablets, and home computers. A QR code has also been added to all route maps. This allows passengers to quickly access all route information: by scanning the bar code with their smart phone. Route maps are posted at all bus stops/shelters and on the web. In June, 2014 Beaumont City Council formally adopted a Comprehensive Operations Analysis prepared by Transportation Management Sr. Design, Inc. as part of the FY 2014/15 SRTP. Changes trade have lead to an increase in passengers. 13 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Major trip destinations include the high school and middle schools, MSJC Pass Campus, commercial areas along Beaumont Avenue, 6th Street, 2nd Street Marketplace, Oak Valley shopping center, Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue; the Super Wal-Mart transfer point; Desert Hills Outlet Malls, Cabazon Outlet Mall, Casino Morongo; Beaver Medical and the Highland Springs medical offices adjacent to the San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital and thrift store; Loma Linda's Highland Springs Medical Centex; Riverside County Department of Public Social Services; Banning Mental Health and public health clinic; and RE.L,P. Beaumont Unified School District eliminated transportation services to both middle schools and the high school forcing students to find alternate transportation. In the past year, mid -day transportation to the elementary schools has been terminated as well. Additionally, two charter schools have moved to Beaumont, creating more need for transportation in the downtown area at peak times. All of the routes that specifically accommodate youth passengers are at or exceeding capacity. Tripper buses have been added where necessary to accommodate the overflow of passengers that travel on certain routes. A second bus was recently added to Routes 3 and 7 to offer more time points and faster service for those passengers. Approximately 60 percent of the total passenger trips are youth passengers, with moderate growth expected in the next year, As part of the comprehensive operation analysis, recommended route changes were made and have led to increased ridership on non -school routes. These changes increased service to major employers such as Stater Brothers, Duraplastics, Wal-Mart Supercenter, Lowe's Distribution Plant, Home Depot, Morongo Casino, and the outlet malls. Future warehouse distribution centers are anticipated in the next two years as well as the new Banning Courthouse which opened in May 2015. Staff will continue to monitor these developments closely and have planned route changes in accordance with company work hours. With the addition of Commuter link 120, special efforts were made to market this route to local veterans and enlisted members of our armed services. Beaumont Transit met with the local veteran advocates and preliminary discussions were held with representatives from March Air Reserve Base. Finally, expanded outreach efforts to elementary -aged passengers, senior citizen organizations, schools, and major employers are included in the plan for FY 2016. Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs The system's fixed route buses are equipped with passenger -operated bicycle racks. All revenue service vehicles are equipped with wheelchair lifts and tie -down stations. Fight vehicles are equipped with seatbelts. Beaumont Transit will be adding three new CNG vehicles to the fleet this year, which are all equipped with wheelchair lifts and tie -down stations. Bus stops in commercial areas are equipped with benches. Kiosks have been installed at all bus stop signs. Waste containers are available at many of the commercial bus stops. Flag down stops are utilized in a few of the residential areas of Beaumont. Currently, Beaumont Transit has bus shelters located at twelve of the most utilized stops. .All bus stop amenities were purchased with State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds. Also purchased were digital security cameras and the necessary viewing equipment for all new buses in the fleet. This project was funded through Prop 1B Security Funds. 14 Three new CNG vehicles will be purchased in FY 2015/2016. These buses will be purchased using Prop 1B and STA fiends. A new computer server was purchased with additional hard drive space for the security cameras as the previous server was at capacity and did not have enough room for Beaumont Transit's growing needs. Beaumont Transit changed administrative locations in October 2013. The vehicle maintenance yard is still in operation at the old transportation center location on California Avenue. improvements were made and continue to be made to Building D behind the Civic Center to allow for transit dispatch to operate in its new location. Additional cameras and a new rolling, electronic gate will be installed for security at the yard. As part of the GPS software roll -out, staff entered into an agreement with the DoubleMap consultant to design a system -wide map to include all routes in the Pass area. . At the end of 2010, staff completed training and implementation on Google Transit, with the assistance of RCTC staff. All bus stops and times are accessible via the web on Google Transit. CHAPTER 3 - PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION Recommended Service Changes Route 3 The addition of a second bus is recommended during peak hours to assist with influx of youth passengers. Route 4 Route 4 will absorb Route 11, making one streamlined route that deviates in the first hour to assist in getting students that live on the Beaumont/Banning border to Beaumont schools. Route 17 Due to a decrease in demand, Route 17 will be eliminated for FY 2016. Route 120 Route 120 will have additional service hours during peak times on Saturdays due to an increase in demand for passengers who need to catch the Metrolink on weekends. Route times will coincide with the train schedules. Dial -a -Ride Due to an increase in ADA certified passengers, a third Dial -a -Ride bus is needed during peak hours in order to service all passengers. Cooperative efforts are in the works with Riverside Transit Agency to help with travel training, which will hopefully result in some of the Dial -a -Ride passengers switching to the Fixed Route system. Marketing Plans and Promotions Efforts have been made to market the Pass Transit System over the past year and will continue in the coming year. These efforts include purchasing advertising on a map of the San Gorgonio Pass Area, distribution of route maps through the utility bills, delivering route maps to the library, chamber of commerce, local businesses, and bus shelters. Route maps have also been placed on all 15 of the buses in map holders. Kiosks have been installed at all bus stop signs with current maps and time points included. During school orientation, staff met with students and parents to educate them on their transit options in the Pass Area. Beaumont Transit has been invited back for the coming school year and we look forward to the upcoming events. Due to the increased use of smartphones as a means for accessing information, Beaumont Transit now offers GPS locators on all buses through a mobile app called DoubleMap. A website has also been set up at Beautnont.doublemap.com for users to access through their web browsers. DoubleMap shows real-time information and GPS coordinates of all routes currently in service. Additionally, users can access route maps and time points to assist in locating routes and service available. QR codes have also been placed on all route maps and can be scanned from any bus stop. This takes clients directly to the route maps to allow riders to quickly access timetables and route information. The City of Beaumont website, www.BeaumontCares.com, provides basic Pass Transit route, schedule and fare information. Additionally, a link to Google Transit is on the web page. Transit staff is currently working to make information about routes and services more accessible. Customers can submit comments, complaints, concerns, and suggestions through the city website or at AskBeaumont.org. Beaumont staff participates in regional veteran committees to promote veteran transportation services from the Pass area to the Lorna Linda VA hospital. Additionally, a member from VetLink was invited to attend monthly transportation meetings. The following marketing efforts will be undertaken to promote ridership growth. 1, Continue outreach programs to schools and at community events. 2. Attend senior community meetings to provide information. 3. Participate in the Mt. San Jacinto Jr. College GO -PASS Program to encourage ridership of college students. 4. Enclose flyers with transit information in city utility bills. 16 5. Meetings will continue with representatives from the local veteran advocate agencies and March Air Reserve Base to increase active and retired military ridership. Budget Impact on Proposed Changes Additional buses being added to Route 3 and Dial -a -Ride, and the addition of Saturday service on CommuterLink 120 will result in an overall increase in total service hours. Additional drivers, fuel and maintenance costs will require additional LTF funding for operating expenses for FY 2016. CHAPTER 4 - FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS Operating and Capital Budget Beaumont Pass Transit is requesting $2,039,400 in LTF funding for FY 2016, a 3 percent increase over current fiscal year funding. Increased service hours, fuel and maintenance costs, anticipated increase in personnel overhead costs of approximately 10 percent, and annual expenses previously funded through Capital Improvement Project {GIP} funds, dictate the need for the increase. STA funding in the amount of $300,000 as listed in Table 4, are needed to fund a new CNG station. This station will service the growing CNG fleet as well as meet the needs of the community and private organizations. Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program Capital projects are funded through STA funds and Proposition 1B capital and security grants for Beaumont. Operating costs are funded through LTF and Farebox Revenues. Regulatory and Compliance Requirements The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 The Dial -A -Ride services provide ADA complementary paratransit service for the fixed route services. The system uses a self -certification process with professional verification. The Pass Area Transit has allowed RTA to certify its ADA passengers and work under the umbrella of RTA's ADA policy as a provider of ADA paratransit. Title VI The Pass Transit System does not utilize federal funds for operating expenses. As such, Title VI requirements do not currently apply to the transit system. Alternatively Fueled Vehicles (RC C Policy) The Pass Transit System operates CNG-powered buses on multiple fixed -routes. The balance of the system's revenue service vehicles are diesel and gasoline -powered. Future vehicle purchases will be in compliance with the RCTC and SCAQMD policies regarding alternative fuel transit vehicles. CNG fueling stations are available in both cities, which will assist with expanded fueling needs and fast fueling capability. State Transit Assistance (STA) Compliance At this time, Beaumont does not urili7e STA funding for operating expenses. As such, compliance with the Public Utilities Commission requitement is not applicable. 17 rip raised 8LZ`99T 609`T9T'Z Ot+6`5S6'T 0 £T ZT 9E£ :sleiol SIOzIo15 �a6#ueWapausue{t EE9$ZI OZ9'EOT ST 6`L6 b8E'VOE T60'T9 SS0`6L 5ZE'SOT 5E0'56 99L'ZZZ 99S$ Z 17TS`OTT 08E10E 5ZE'TK EE9'tiZT OZ9'EOT SI6`L6 b8E't+OE 160'I9 SS0'6L SZ£'SOI SEO'S6 99eZZZ 99S`7TZ VT S'OT T 08E'TOE SZE`IK OZ9$01 117078 8T0`Z6 LOL`EOE SZ8'LE 64E'SS 6I0'69 69S'IL 68Z'ZTZ 9L9'ZIZ Mt £S6'S6Z 617e6Z E VD Na Na VD Na tlJ tl9 VD tl� tlJ Na 3d 30 Z£ Z£ ZE bZ £E ££ EE EE ZE ZE ZE OE 8Z 8Z VT 0£ 0E OE OE bT TT 8Z O£ 0£ ZiJ_S als DOSS -a DINS aa� NO3 NO3 NO3 NO3 NO3 N43 NCI3 NOD aa3 a93 OOSS 3WD (IWO 3880 888 321Sa 9a9 OTOZ 600Z 600Z T00Z iiOZ TTOZ TIE TTOZ 600Z 800Z OTOZ 000Z 00OZ ST/VIM Ad (y ew "e's) aiee-01-seeA aAIPV Jed WIN 81.111124n 96e.I9nV ET/biOt A� yaelnl Omuta sallW al3PlaA a lea W alrl bT/EIOZ Ad pu3 JeaA Japd se!!fi alalyaA a lea of a!7 STMOZ Jld saplyaA Awa6u!}uo3 3a # ST/bTOZ saplyaA asIPV 3o apo3 ad/1,A len4 sp6ua� el*IM pedd!nb3 Alpede3 duteb 6uµees pup ii!l apo3 ppoW apo3 'b3W il!nt� aeaA paiendn A1430-11.q / (sngao;oW) sna auownea9 3fl Ails as7d4lsue.{L °Suet/JANIS9r/SIOZAd AsojusAuj _paid - r ame1 mkuxur)Lo piadsmm I a q _�� _ INIII None� [tarty Imrparlrfim (arrrresxn Demand Response / Directly Operated Table 1- Fleet Inventory FYZOs5/26Short Range Transit Nan City of Beaumont Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length Fuel Type Cade # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles throug h March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehide As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) IY 2014/15 2010 2010 2010 FRD FRD FRD Ford E450 Ford E-450 Ford E-450 16 16 16 1 1 1 24 24 24 GA GA GA 1 1 1 0 0 Q 147,148 113,666 105,265 171,368 144,944 155,553 171,368 144,944 155,553 Totals: TransTrackManagerr" 5/15/2015 48 3 3 0 366,079 471,865 157,288 Page 2 of 5/15/2015 NM tom IN. lhvrsdt fumy. lmapsiciirn {arnWlsrcn Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial data Total Operating Expenses Total Passenger Fare Revenue Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips Passenger Miles Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) Total Actual Vehide Miles Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy per Passenger Subsidy per Passenger Mile Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Gar Miles for hail Modes, FY 2012/ 13 Audited $1,651,058 $400,034 $1,251,023 209,299 418,998 20,321.0 319,562.0 348,493.0 $81.25 24,23% $5.98 $2.99 $61.56 $3.91 10.3 0.66 r FY 2013/14 Audited $1,862,023 $217,529 $1,644,493 215,398 428,521 22,479.8 393,720.0 421,095.0 $82.83 11.68% $7.63 $3.84 $73.15 $4.18 9.6 0.55 Table 2 -- City of Beaumont -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2014/15 Plan 14 $2,200,000 $220,000 $1,980,000 209,495 2,123,415 22,294.0 426,693.0 456,990.0 $98.68 10,00% $9.45 $0.93 $88.81 $4.64 9.4 0.49 FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual $146,539 $10,371 $136,168 9,837 20,625 1,866.7 32,146.0 33,995.0 $78,50 7.08% $13.84 $6.60 $72.95 $4.24 5.3 0.31 FY 2015/16 Plan 14 $2,266,001 $226,600 $2,039,401 227,618 666,374 23,682.0 396,716.0 426,158.0 $95.68 9.99% $8.96 $3.06 $86.12 $5.14 9.6 0.57 71-ans7radrManager"' Page 1 of r MINN — lisxndc tasty limpaidica famainicn Table 2 -- City of Beaumont -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 8 Financial Data • Total Operating Expenses $288,234 $1,959,047 $20,985 $1,700,517 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $102,636 $195,905 $2,208 $170,052 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $185,598 $1,763,142 $18,776 $1,530,465 Operating Characteristics F Unlinked Passenger Trips 57,487 4,541 169,412 1,946 152,620 Passenger Miles 109,225 8,628 1,656,076 3,697 463,964 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 4,708.1 2,381.6 19,292.0 249,6 15,847.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 76,213.0 88,033.0 384,974.0 3,880.0 297,846.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 89,084.0 92,356.0 408,505.0 4,113.0 319,809.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $61.22 $101.55 $84.06 $107.31 Farebox Recovery Ratio 35.61% 10.00% 10.52% 9.99% Subsidy per Passenger $3,23 $10,41 $4.65 $10.03 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.70 $1.06 $5,08 $3.30 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $39.42 $91.34 $75.22 $96.58 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (6) $2.44 $4.58 $4.84 $5.14 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 12,2 1.9 8.8 7.8 9.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.75 0.05 0.44 0.50 0.51 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TYansTYack Manager`' 5/15/2015 Page I oft MIWENN� iiLirAt (miry l:napAviv, Gimisirn Table 2 -- City of Beaumont -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Nan -Excluded Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 5 6 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,362,823 $1,862,023 $240,953 $125,554 $565,484 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $297,398 $217,529 $24,095 $8,163 $56,548 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,065,425 $1,644,493 $216,858 $117,391 $508,936 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 151,812 210,857 40,083 7,891 74,998 Passenger Miles 309,772 41%893 467,339 16,927 202,410 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Hours (a) 15,613.0 20,098.2 3,002.0 1,617.0 7,835.0 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Miles (b) 243,349.0 305,687.0 41,719.0 28,266.0 98,870.0 Total Actual Vehide Mlles 259,409.0 328,739.0 48,485.0 29,882.0 106,349.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $87.29 $92.65 $80.26 $77.64 $72.17 Farebox Recovery Ratio 21.82% 11.68% 9.99% 6.50% 9.99% Subsidy per Passenger $7.02 $7.80 $5.41 $14.88 $6.79 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.44 $3.92 $0.46 $6.94 $2.51 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $68.24 $81.82 $72.24 $72.60 $64.96 Subsidy per Revenue Mlle (b) $4.38 $5.38 $5.20 $4.15 $5.15 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 9.7 10.5 13.4 4.9 9.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.62 0.69 0.96 0.28 0.76 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes, TransTrack Manager"" 5/15/2015 Page 1 of 5/15/2015 ` mar - iivtnilc Loup 1'mpxlditri CaimBzirn fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses Total Passenger Fare Revenue Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips Passenger Miles Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) Total Actual Vehicle Mlles Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy per Passenger Subsidy per Passenger Mile Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. FY 2012/13 Audited $1,170,830 $368,903 $801,927 190,589 362,119 17,004.1 275,627.0 300,438.0 $68,86 31.51% $4.21 $2.21 $47.16 $2.91 11,2 0.69 FY 2013//4 Audited $1,339,462 $196,407 $1,143,055 198,499 377,148 19,386.9 352,422.0 376,253.0 $69.09 14.66% $5.76 $3.03 $58.96 $3.24 10.2 0.56 Table 2 -- Beaumont -BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2014/15 Plan 12 $2,033,796 $203,380 $1,830,416 196,437 1,997,573 20,052.0 395,877.0 423,546.0 $101.43 10.00% $9.32 $0.92 $91.28 $4,62 9.8 0.50 FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual $109,904 $7,661 $102,243 8,140 15,466 1,576.6 28,388.0 29,868.0 $69,71 6.97% $12.56 $6.61 $64.85 $3.60 5.2 0.29 FY 2015/16 Plan 11 $1,953,096 $195,310 $1,757,786 205,176 623,734 19,119.0 341,515.0 367,311.0 $102.15 10.00% $8.57 $2.82 $91.94 $5.15 10.7 0.60 TransTradr Manager" Page 1 of 5/15/2015 Nils `� iir�tsil� LClny l=pYlcrim Gs�miss m Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses Total Passenger Fare Revenue Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips Passenger Miles Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) Total Actual Vehide Revenue Miles (b) Totaf Actual Vehicle Miles Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy per Passenger Subsidy per Passenger Mire Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. FY 2012/13 Audited $480,228 $31,132 $449,096 18,710 56,878 3,317.0 43,935.0 48,055.0 $144.78 6.48% $24.00 $7.90 $135,39 $10.22 5,6 0.43 FY 2013/14 Audited $522,560 $21,122 $501,439 16,899 51,373 3,092.9 41,298.0 44,842.0 $16896 4.04% $29.67 $9.76 $162.13 $12.14 5.5 0.41 Table 2 -- Beaumont-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2014/15 Plan 2 $166,204 $16,620 $149,584 13,058 125,842 2,242.0 30,816.0 33,444.0 $74,13 9.99% $11.46 $1.19 $66.72 $4.85 5.8 0.42 FY 2014/15 3rd qtr Actual $36,635 $2,710 $33,925 , 1,697 5,159 290.1 3,758.0 4,127.0 $126.29 7.40% $19.99 $6.58 $116.95 $9.03 5.9 0.45 FY 2015/16 Plan 3 $312,905 $31,290 $281,615 22,142 42,640 4,563.0 55,201.0 58,847.0 $68.57 9.99% $12.55 $6.60 $61.72 $5.10 4.9 0.41 TransTrackManager"" Pagel of t Beaumont Transit FY 2015/16-FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Table 2A — Excluded Routes Route # Mode (FR/DR) Service Type (DO/CO) Route Description Date of Implementation Exemption End Date 1 FR DO Beaumont to Cabazon, Trunk Route July, 2014 July, 2017 3/4 FR DO Wal-Mart shopping center, Sundance, BHS, Sports Park, Cherry Valley July, 2014 July, 2017 4 FR DO Wal-Mart shopping center, Hospital, 6tn, Beaumont Ave, Pennsylvania, Sports Park, Three Rings Ranch July, 2014 July, 2017 7 FR DO Oak Valley Pkwy, Palmer, Cherry Valley, Brookside, Beaumont Ave, Stetson Community July, 2014 July, 2017 120 FR DO CommuterLink from Beaumont to San Bernardino with stops Calimesa and Loma Linda July, 2015 July, 2018 Note: Excluded routes are new routes or new service extensions that are eligible for exemption from the farebox recovery requirements. `a>i- riwr a, [curt. Vnapsidicn (umritlin Dab Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Beaumont -- 2 FY 2015/16 All Routes Peak Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Passenger Revenue To41 Revenue MNes Hours Hours Mlles Total Operating Passenger Net Miles Lost Revenue Subsidy BEA-1 Total 2 75,365 229,109 7,004.0 7,294.0 108,690.0 114,320.0 $607,871 $80,100 $527,771 BEA-120 Total 1 8,662 26,150 3,412.0 3,631.0 109,8640 115,235.0 $612,737 $61,274 $551,463 BEA-3 Total 2 36,562 I11,148 2,911.0 3,008.0 38,445.0 40,103.0 $213,238 $21,324 $191,914 BEA-3/4 Total 1 2,851 8,667 993.0 1,037.0 13,0113.13 13,793,0 $73,34I $7,334 $66,007 BEA-4 Total 1 26,340 80,674 3,342.0 3,492.0 43,978.0 47,164,0 $250,785 $25,079 $225,707 BEA-7 Total 3 39,462 119,964 1,1396,0 1,531.0 22,,296,0 29,297,0 $155,783 $/5,578 $140,205 BEA-9 Total 1 15,994 48,622 361,0 663.0 5,224.0 7,399.0 $39,341 $3,934 $35,407 BEA-OAR Total 3 22,442 42,640 4,563,0 4,825.6 55,201.0 58,847.0 $312,905 $31,290 $281,615 5erviceProvider Totals 14 227,618 666,374 23,682.0 25,421.13 396,716.0 426,158.0 $2,266,001 $245,913 $2,020,0813 liansTYadrManayerm 5f7f2915 Pape 10(2 zJo r a6ad 51027L15 wla6ttue/yvalisueu LS'0 9'6 60'S$ OE'SB$ EO'E$ L8's$ %58'OT 96'6$ TL'S$ 89'S6$ 51g01-Japuorde31Aueg IVO 6'17 01'5$ ZL'T9$ 09'9$ SS' ZT$ %66'6 46'Ei$ L9'S$ LS'89$ lelol ova-V38 90'E El+ BLV 80'86$ EL'o$ in$ %66'6 96'Z$ ES'L$ 86'901$ Mal 6-Y30 LLI 0'9E 6Z'9$ Z6'LZT$ LT1$ SS'E$ %66'6 SEE$ 66'9$ bTZbT$ 1E101 L-V30 09'0 67 ErS$ b5'L9$ ZB'Z$ LS'8$ %00'OT ZS'6$ OL'S$ 40'SL$ IR01 t~V38 ZZ'0 67 LO'S$ LV99$ Z9'L$ 5T'EZ$ %00'0T ZL'SZ$ E9'S$ 98'EL$ 1e101 WEAGEI S8'0 9'ZT 6617$ E6'59$ EL'T$ S'Z'S$ %OOTT E8'S$ SS'S$ SZ'EL$ 1,2101 E-V38 80'0 57 20'S$ Z919T$ 60'TZ$ TT'iJ9$ %ODD T EZ'TL$ 85'S$ BS'6LL$ Idol OZT•V38 69'0 8'OT 9834 S£'SL$ OE'Z$ OO'L$ %LTIT L01$ 6S'5$ 6L'98$ 1gl01 T V38 eION lad moH gad DIM moH eNp aabuaesed opal a961.11911sed e11N anuaweb 'non ;Kimmel' gal Aga * innoti sla6uessad suaduessed enuo ed anuaeed ie6uessed gad AplsgnS Aranmad god lda'J add 4107 gad 1103 Jed ApIs4n5 Aid *MEWS red 4i19115 Yotpue3 Bapeaado 6upeuado fu07131PUI aoueuuopad se;nob Hy 9T/STUZ Ad r -- wowneap;o A.10 5295.4e7S d1ZIS - yaswuv) impbcQ Z4.`WMI Jp J�11� Now NM 31321 Table 3A— Individual Route Descriptions Line Route Description Areas/Sites Serviced 1 Downtown Beaumont to Wal-Mart shopping center west to Beaumont then east to Cabazon via 6th Street/Ramsey St. 2nd Street Marketplace shopping center and transfer point to RTA, San Gorgonio hospital, Beaumont Civic Center, banks, downtown Beaumont, Stater Bros./Walgreens shopping center, Orchard Park Apartments, Sports Park, shopping/restaurants along 6th Street, Mt. View Middle school, Beaver Medical Clinic, DPSS, Banning City Hall, Desert Hills outlet mall, Cabazon Outlet !Nall, and Morongo Resort Casino 3 Wal-Mart shopping center then north through Sundance community to Beaumont High School with immediate return via the same route 2nd Street Marketplace shopping center and transfer to RTA, San Gorgonio hospital, Sundance elementary, Sundance Community, Orchard Park Apartments, Mt. View and San Gorgonio middle schools, Sports Park, Cherry Valley, and Beaumont High School 4 Wal-Mart shopping center then north to hospital, west via 6th Street then north on Palm Ave to Sports Park 2nd Street Marketplace shopping center and transfer point to RTA, San Gorgonio hospital, Beaumont Civic Center, banks, downtown Beaumont, library, Stater Bros./Walgreens shopping center, Orchard Park Apartments, Sports Park, shopping/restaurants along 6th Street and Beaumont Ave, Mt. View and San Gorgonio middle schools, and various apartment complexes Oak Valley Parkway, Palmer, Cherry Valley Blvd, Brookside, Champions, Desert Lawn, Beaumont Ave, Cougar Way, Oak Valley Parkway and repeat loop, Fairway Canyon, Tournament Hills, Beaumont High, Mt. View Middle School, San Gorgonio Middle school, Oak Valley Greens, Oak Valley Shopping Center, Stetson community, and Cherry Valley 9 Seneca Springs, north on Pennsylvania to Palm Ave. and continuing north on Beaumont Ave. WallVlart and 2nd Street Marketplace, Seneca Springs community, Four Seasons Active Retirement community, Loma Linda Medical Center, San Gorgonio Middle School, Oak Valley Shopping Center, Mt. View Middle School, and Beaumont High School 3/4 Cherry Valley Blvd, Beaumont Ave, Brookside, Cherry Ave, Pennsylvania, 81h, Xenia, 6t, Highland Springs, San Gorgonio Hospital, WalMart, Cougar, Beaumont Ave, Vineland, Nancy and repeat the loop. Weekend service only, Beaumont High School, Sports Park, Chatigny Center, Noble Creek Apts., San Gorgonio Hospital, 2nd Street Marketplace, Orchard Park Apts., Cherry Valley Market, Cherry Valley Mobile Park. 120 Wal-Mart to San Bernardino Metrolink, Loma Linda VA Hospital and Calimesa. Now available on Saturdays at peak times. Commuter Link with direct service from Wal- Mart to San Bernadino Metrolink, Loma Linda Veterans Hospital and Calimesa. spcpalsaribaN spun 9 LfS LCIF h A Jo AllaukunS 54 64 5 PaG1+.76 0$ 009'93Z$ 999$ rzL'86$ 1,gl'dl,Z$ OOWOQ£$ 01017'6£4'ZS 0r8`Z£8'Z5 1 le0e3 2 Bupeiado :Inxol OS OS 5.9r8 1;ZI'9LS 1.StItrZ$ OM'OK'S 0$ R6aN s.s4 imide3 :lull:441s ;99v5 trtt 19 a T. _ .. 404 J3ES S993 tranLI 4SV1t3 CIOD'40£# f-SL ),A £09L AA Z09L AA 1.09L AA NI-totA3 d01311 Pods01-1 epuil euioi as ra113nDA SLIhL 1t.i Woes et dad S1117L AAv-soiad Ei dad sa aunnaddul +.10101S sN3 .,S 911:,'.}7:8 .7S L5 f OS '.:,r6£4`Z$ oon9te$ LIIiLJe-da :Iel4xgns as st,Z$ OOtr-6£a`Z$ 6QD'99Z'Z$ sasuadxbunmadp uialiLO xoe wed! d413-1 opau Owe du +I4P(1-10S 9 L dad ( VAS ILNld) 94 dad 71S 117 ...--,pun J4IMO-W M.)1 1:.1 JagwnM P!ad 106e3 U01jd4J3Saci pafaJd 9LQZ-Ad aal peJsenbea spun4 Jo AJC1Al41+nS - elqtl ueld pual abuu-d 110y$ palsanba•t{ spunA la {ucuxun 9161.E kJ luowneae 40 Au3 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: 2016-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: CNG Station Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) The City of Beaumont has identified a new CNG refueling station as a top priority for the long term success of public transit in the San Gorgonio Pass Area. In September of 2014, the City Council created a CNG Ad -Hoc committee in order to identify possible locations for a new CNG facility. The City of Beaumont has been working collaboratively with Southern California Gas Company to identify a location that is ideal for a large CNG facility, with enough capacity to serve the multitude of public transportation agencies coming into the San Gorgonio Pass Area. In December of 2014, City staff presented the Beaumont City Council with a prospective location that was identified as optimal by Southern California Gas Company, however, the location was not ideal for the City Council, who were concerned about large vehicles traversing small city streets. Instead, the Council directed City staff and Southern California Gas Company to assess a different location, located on 4th Street in Beaumont. This location is currently being reviewed by Southern California Gas Company. If this location is deemed to be appropriate, the City anticipates construction will begin in January 2016. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The only CNG fueling facility in the Pass Area is owned and operated by Beaumont Unified School District. The fueling is limited during the day and as the Pass Transit fleet expands, a second fueling facility is needed to accommodate the growth not only of Pass Transit, but of other private agencies. The city has received additional funds to complete this project from the Mobile Source Reduction Committee in the amount of $200,000, with a City match requirement of $100,000. The total project cost is estimated at $1.3 million for a full -service facility capable of providing CNG fuel for all of the public transportation agencies in the San Gorgonio Pass area. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 15-16 $300,000 Total $300,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP 1D # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) SRTP 94-01 CNG Station $100,000 SRTP 95-03 CNG Station $300,000 City of Beaumont FY 2016/17 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B (PTMISEA) Prop 1 B Security Measure A Fare Box Other''' Operating Expenses $2,333,980 $2,100,582 $233,398 Subtotal: Operating $2,333,980 $2,100,582 $0 $0 $0 $0 $233,398 $0 2 Type 7 buses for expansion/replacement Security Cameras FY17-01 FY 17-02 $1,000,000 $36,000 $1,000,000 $36,000 ' Subtotal: Capital $1,036,000 $0 $1,036,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating 8 Capital $2,072,000 $2,100,582 $1,036,000 $0 $0 $0 $233,398 $0 Revised 05/06/2015 Summary of FY 2016/17 Funds Requested.xls Table 5.1 — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing protect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY 2017-01 FTIP No: NIA PROJECT NAME: 2 Type 7 buses for expansion/replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION: {For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type} Procurement of 2 Type 7 buses for expansion of new routes and replacement of existing buses. New buses will be fueled by CNG. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Currently we have 2 diesel vehicles in our fleet, as well as numerous buses ready for replacement. These vehicles will replace existing gas vehicles and help to achieve the goal of operating only CNG buses. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing proiect in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount 5TA 16-17 $1,000,000 Total $1,000,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) $1,000,000 SRTP 15-01 2 Type 7 buses for replacement/expansion * 1 S-01 Buses have been ordered and are currently being manufactured. Both are CNG buses. Table 5.1 — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY 2017-02 FTIP No: N/A PROJECT NAME: Security Cameras for FY 2017-01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Security Camera installation for 2 Type 7 buses procured with Project 17-01 funds. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Security cameras are necessary for the safety of our passengers, to monitor and evaluate situations, and to assist in the event that a vehicle might be vandalized/stolen. Buses will not come equipped with security equipment. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 16-17 $36,000 Total $36,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) SRTP 15-02 Security Cameras $36,000 * 15-01 Buses have been ordered and are currently being manufactured. Both are CNG buses. 15-02 Cameras will be installed upon receipt of vehicles. City of Beaumont FY 2017/18 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017I18 Project Description Capital Project Number (t) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 S (PTMISEA) Prop i s Security Measure A Fare Box Other12) Operating Expenses $2,403,999 $2,163,599 $240,400 Subtotal: Operating $2,403,999 $2,163,599 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,400 $0 2 Type 7 buses for expansion/replacement Security Cameras FY18-01 FY 18-02 $1,000,000 $36,000 $1,000,000 $36,000 Subtotal: Capital $1,036,000 $0 $1,036,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $3,439,999 $2,163,599 $1,036,000 $0 $0 $0 $240,400 $0 Revised 051106/2015 Summary of FY 2017/18 Funds Requested.xls Table 5.2 - Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing protect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number): 1 SRTP Project No: FY 2018-01 FTIP No: N/A PROJECT NAME: 2 Type 7 buses for expansion/replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Procurement of 2 Type 7 buses for expansion of new routes and replacement of existing buses. New buses will be fueled by CNG. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Currently we have 2 diesel vehicles in our fleet, as well as numerous buses ready for replacement. These vehicles will replace existing gas vehicles and help to achieve the goal of operating only CNG buses. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing proiect in FTIP indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 17-18 $1,000,000 Total $1,000,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) $1,000,000 SRTP 15-01 2 Type 7 buses for replacement/expansion * 15-ill Buses have been ordered and are currently being manufactured. Both are CNG buses. Table 5.2 — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing proiect in FTIP, indicate FTIP I❑ number): f SRTP Project No: FY 2018-02 FTIP No: NIA PROJECT NAME: Security Cameras for FY 2018-01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Security Camera installation for 2 Type 7 buses procured with Project 18-01 funds. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Security cameras are necessary for the safety of our passengers, to monitor and evaluate situations, and to assist in the event that a vehicle might be vandalized/stolen. Buses will not come equipped with security equipment. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 17-18 $36,000 Total $36,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) $36,000 SRTP 15-02 Security Cameras *15-01 Buses have been ordered and are currently being manufactured. Both are CNG buses. 15-02 Cameras will be installed upon receipt of vehicles. City of Beaumont Transit System SRTP 15-16 TABLE 6 — PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Audit Recommendations {Covering FY 2009/10-2011/12 Action(s) Taken And Results (1) Ensure the timely completion and submittal of the annual State Controller Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports. With the additional office staff added to Transit last fiscal year, procedures have been implemented to prevent further delays in completion of these important documents. (1) If no action taken, provide schedule for implementation or explanation of why the recommendation is no longer relevant. NEB immai #i�rr.3t finny l;wpzldlm Guirr sirn Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Beaumont Data Elements Unlinked Passenger Trips Passenger Miles Total Actual Vehide Revenue Hours Total Actual Vehide Revenue Miles Total Actual Vehide Miles Total Operating Expenses Total Passenger Fare Revenue Net Operating Expenses Performance Indicators FY 2014/15 Plan 209,495 2,123,415 22,294.0 426,693.0 456,990.0 $2,200,000 $220,000 $1,980,000 FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 10.00% >= 10.00% 11.27% Meets Target Discretiona : 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour 2. Subsidy Per Passenger 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile 4. Subsidy Per Hour 5. Subsidy Per Mile 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile $98.68 $9.45 $0.93 $88.81 $4.64 9.40 0.49 <= $90.50 >= $7.04 and <= $9.52 >= $3.54 and <= $4.78 >= $67.51 and <= $91.33 >= $3.87 and <= $5.23 >= 8.16 and <= 11.04 >= 0.47 and <=13.63 $94.83 $8.45 $4.22 $84.15 $4,91 10.00 0.58 Fails to Meet Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicator; Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: i TiansT}aair Manager'"' 5/6/2015 Page 1 of 1 Ma MOM C entir Lomy l:acpsIrtim (arrvnscn FY 2015/16 - Table 8 -- SRTp Performance Report Service Provider: City of Beaumont A11 Routes Performance Indicators FY 2013/14 End of Year Actual FY 2014/15 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2015/16 Plan FY 2015/16 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 215,398 164,720 227,618 None Passenger Miles 428,521 329,653 666,374 None Revenue Hours 22,479.8 16,539.4 23,682.0 None Total Hours 24,797.7 18,008.0 25,421.0 None Revenue Miles 393,720.0 283,425.0 396,716.0 None Total Miles 421,095.0 303,116.0 426,158.0 None Operating Costs $1,862,023 $1,568,493 $2,266,001 None Passenger Revenue $217,529 $176,719 $245,913 None Operating Subsidy $1,644,493 $1,391,774 $2,020,088 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $82.83 $94.83 $95.68 <= $95.74 Meets Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $4.73 $5.53 $5.71 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $8.64 $9.52 $9.96 None Farehox Recovery Ratio 11.68% 11.27% 10.850/a >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $7.63 $8.45 $8.87 >= $7.18 and <= $9.72 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $3.84 $4.22 $3.03 >- $3.59 and <= $4.85 Better Than Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $73.15 $84.15 $85.30 >= $71.53 and <= $96.77 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $4.18 $4.91 $5.09 >= $4.17 and <= $5.65 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 9.60 10.00 9.60 >= 8.50 and r- 11.50 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.55 0.58 0.57 >� 0.49 and <= 0.67 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2015/16 Plan to the FY 2015/16 Primary Target. TransTrack Manager"' 5/6/2015 Page 1 of 1 Table 9 HIGHLIGHTS OF SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • Increase bus service on Route 3 by adding additional buses at peak times. • Increase service regionally to San Bernardino County by adding Saturday service to Route 120. • Coordinate Tenant Improvements on existing Transit office. • Install more bus shelters and bus benches throughout service area to improve and enhance service provided with the city of Beaumont. • Expand outreach efforts to senior citizen organizations, schools and major employers. • Expand outreach efforts to veterans and active service members. • Maintain and improve the GPS tracking system to assist riders in knowing where their desired route is located. • Continue to work with the City of Banning to improve coordination. Operating and Financial Data FY 11/12 Audited FY 12/13 Audited FY 13/14 Audited FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Planned Systemwide Ridership 183,176 209,299 215,398 219,626 227,618 Operating Costs per Revenue Hour $87.03 $81.25 $82.83 $94.83 $95.68 Table 9B — Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Recovery Policy) Revenue Source Included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2013/2014 Audit FY 14/15 (Estimate) FY 15/16 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 217,529 235,625 245,913 1 Interest 3. General Fund Supplement 4. Measure A 5. Advertising Revenue 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets 7. CNG Revenue 8.Lease/Other Revenue 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund 10. Investment Income 11, CaIPERS CERBT 12. Fare Revenue from Exempt Routes 49,660 13. Other Revenues TOTAL REVENUE for Farebox Calculation (1-13) 167,869 235,625 245,913 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES for Farebox Calculation 1,474,989 2,200,000 2,266,001 FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 11% 10% 10% FIXED ROUTE Fare Categories FARES Base Fare r Have exact Drivers Day Pass fare ready cannot make 10-Tripper Punch Pass when bus arrives. change. NO REFUNDS 10-Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 N/A $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades K-12) $1.00 $3 00 $10 00 NIA $30 00 Senior (so+)'* $.65 $1.80 NIA $5.85 $21.50 Disabled or Veteran** $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Child or tau or under) $.25 N/A N/A N/A NIA Zone/Deviations $.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A GO Pass, Active Military and Active Jurors' RIDE FREE **If you plan to use a senior or disabled discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Dial -A -Ride FARES I Have exact fare ready when bus arrives. Drivers cannot make change. NO REFUNDS Fare Categories Base Fare 10-Ride Punch Card One -Way $2.00 $18.00 Companion $3 00 N/A Dial -A -Ride is a transportation service for ADA, disabled and active adults over 65 years of age. Reservations are required at least 24-hours in advance and may be made by calling (951) 769 -8532. PCA (w/I.D.)** FREE FREE No Show $2.00 N/A Child (46° tau or under) $3.00 N/A **If you plan to use a PCA (Personal Care Atten- dant) free fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. COMMUTER LINK Fare Categories FARES Base Fare General $3.00 Youth (grades K-12) $2 00 Senior (60+r $2.00 Disabled or Veteran** $2.00 Active Duty Military** FREE Child (46" tall or under) $2.00 **If you plan to use a discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. Please call (951) 769-8530 to inquire about proper ID. Beaumont Pass Transit does not accept free transfers from other bus agencies including RTA, OmniTrans and SunLine. The GoPass program is not valid on Commuter Link 120. Beaumont Pass Transit does not operate on: New Year's oar, Memorial oar, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Dar and Christmas Day, PHONE NUMBER INDEX CUSTOMER INFORMATION (951) 769-8530 Information about bus routes, schedules, fares, lost/found and comments. Hours: Mon Thurs 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; Fri 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Additional customer service and information (951) 769-8520 Hours: Mon-Thurs 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; Fri 8:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. 1 Where's the bus? 5cn KNOW„hen 1 1 0 -1:14 r r L .: � •� �i'r Of: REAL-TIME BUS TRACKING beau mon6doublemap.com DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE (951) 769-8532 Transportation services for ADA, disabled and active adults over 65 years OTHER DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICES Banning Dial -A -Ride (951) 922-3252 Care -A -Van (Hemet, San Jacinto) (951) 791-3572 Corona Dial -A -Ride (951) 734-7220 MoVan (Moreno Valley) (951) 358-9202 Norco Senior Bus (951) 270-5647 RTA Dial -A -Ride (800) 795-7887 OTHER FIXED ROUTE SERVICES Amtrak (Nationwide Rail Passenger Service) (800) 872-7245 Coaster (Rail service in San Diego County) (619) 233-3004 Corona Cruiser (Corona bus service) (951) 734-9418 Greyhound (Nationwide service) (800) 231-2222 Metrolink (Rail Passenger Service) (800) 371-5465 OCTA (Service throughout Orange County) (800) 636-7433 Omnitrans (Service in Western San Bernardino County) (800) 966-6428 RTA (Service in Riverside County) (951) 565-5002 Sunline Transit (Palm Springs and Coachella Valley) (760) 343-3456 Super Shuttle (Service to Airports) .(909) 467-9600 ROUTE Info: (951) 769-85 30 Beaumont.doublemap.com Cougar Way Transfer to 9 117 3 4 7 Oak Valley BEAUMONI' San Gorgonio Hospital Transfer to Routes 4 11 Legend I Map not to scale Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Banning Police Dept Transfer to g Route m 3th 4.... San Gorgonio .o , q>r Hospital ca Beaumont �d p ' Banning Civic Center Police Dept 03,„. 4 6th Street 4 X a Ra rl�s% 0 Wal Mart Transfer Station Transfer to Routes 3 120 Wal-Mart V.L CI. 4 04 2nd St Marketplace C 9 4, A cri E Z E 210/ 220 31 35 07.16.201 4 Rev. 0 A. 1 stttreet 5 BANNING N T McDonald's Transfer to Routes Cabazon Circulator i' i Desert Hills `, Outlet Mall Scan QR Code below for all route information Casino Morongo Seminole CABAZON Casino Morongo Transfer to Routes 220 Amtrak Weekdays I Eastbound to Casino Moron90 ' Monday --Friday A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate AM PM 1 d COs. L on 0 rya U CO to y a w y.� .0) ,n 3 ` 0 = % L. d O VS o rI t �co R W g ,D y g Q y 67 b m o d G. O O d0 g .'�"rQ V7 �' x 7) 4:4 0 O 0 CI 6:00 6:15 6:20 6:33 6:50 7:00 7:30 7:45 7:50 8:03 8:20 8:30 8:00 8:15 8:20 8:33 8:50 9:00 8:30 8:45 8:50 9:03 9:20 9:30 9:00 9:15 9:20 9:33 9:50 10:00 9:30 9:45 9:50 10:03 10:20 10:30 10:00 10:15 10:20 10:33 10:50 11:00 10:30 10:45 10:50 11:03 11:20 11:30 11:00 11:15 11:20 11:33 11:50 12:00 11: 3 0 11: 45 11:50 12: 03 12:20 12: 3 0 12:00 12:15 12:20 12:33 12:50 1:00 12:30 12:45 12:50 1:03 1:20 1:30 1:00 1:15 1:20 1:33 1:50 2:00 1:30 1:45 1:50 2:03 2:20 2:30 2:00 2:15 2:20 2:33 2:50 3:00 2:30 2:45 2:50 3:03 3:20 3:30 3:00 3:15 3:20 3:33 3:50 4:00 3:30 3:45 3:50 4:03 4:20 4:30 4:00 4:15 4:20 4:33 4:50 5:00 4:30 4:45 4:50 5:03 5:20 5:30 5:00 5:15 5:20 5:33 5:50 6:00 5:30 5:45 5:50 6:03 6:20 6:30 6:00 6:15 6:20 6:33 6:50 7:00 7:00 7:15 7:20 7:33 7:50 8:00 8:00 8:15 8:20 8:33 8:50 9:00 9:00 9:15 9:20 9:33 9:50 10:00 eekends I as ound Casino Moron90 Saturday and Sunday A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate �d 3g L o U In �d ,,,0 w ,� ��x V Q3 u� o a {'j O CIS V) t `� !6 3 a ��ca ° a� y .0 , 0 0 v C. d o �� .y p ra O "� AM © 0 ® ® ® O 8:00 8:15 8:20 8:33 8:50 9:00 9:00 9:15 9:20 9:33 9:50 10:00 10:00 10:15 10:20 10:33 10:50 11:00 11:00 11:15 11:20 11:33 11:50 12:00 PM 12:00 12:15 12:20 12:33 12:50 1:00 1:00 1.15 1:20 1:33 1:50 2:00 2:00 2:15 2:20 2:33 2:50 3:00 3:00 3:15 3:20 3:33 3:50 4:00 4:00 4.15 4:20 4:33 4:50 5:00 5:00 5:15 5:20 5:33 5:50 6:00 ROUTE 1 Info: (951) 769-8 5 3 d Beaumont.doublemap.eom 4 Beaumont Ave Cougar Way Transfer to Routes Wav Oak Valley 9 + 17 I 3 4 7 BEAUMONT Beaumont Civic Center 411 6th Street 4 Wal-Mart Tra isfer Station Transfer to Routes 120 9 4, 210/ 220 31 35 07.16.2014 Rev. San Gorgonio Hospital Transfer to Routes 3 4 5 11 1st Street BSan Gorgonio Hospital Legend Map not to scale Time andior Transfer Point Transfer Point N T Banning Polite Dept Transfer to I S o Route Q + Et o c7 c BANNING Scan qR Code below for all route information Mcoonald's Transfer to Routes Cabazon Gscufator 5 I Desert Hills Outlet Ma1I Casino Morongo Seminole CABAZON Casino Morongo Transfer to Routes 220 Amtrak Weekdays' Westbound to Cougar Way Monday —Friday A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD 1 Times are approximate AM PM O 0 Oa COO (71,1) 03 C d to u cap o. ® is O pOp Y W O c x co in CO O G to a m -y m0 o Y ? E CU OO a.,Q o an c..)(3j C;$ 5:00 5:11 5:28 5:41 5:46 6:00 6:30 6:41 6:58 7:11 7:16 7:30 7:30 7:41 7:58 8:11 8:16 8:30 8:00 8:11 8:28 8:41 8:46 9:00 8:30 8:41 8:58 9:11 9:16 9:30 9:00 9:11 9:28 9:41 9:46 10:00 9:30 9:41 9:58 10:11 10:16 10:30 10:00 10:11 10:28 10:41 10:46 11:00 10:30 10:41 10:58 11:11 11:16 11:30 11:00 11:11 11:28 11:41 11:46 12:00 11:30 11:41 11:58 12:11 12:16 12:30 12:00 12:11 12:28 12:41 12:46 1:00 12:30 12:41 12:58 1:11 1:16 1:30 1:00 1:11 1:28 1:41 1:46 2:00 1:30 1:41 1:58 2:11 2:16 2:30 2:00 2:11 2:28 2:41 2:46 3:00 2:30 2:41 2:58 3:11 3:16 3:30 3:00 3:11 3:28 3:41 3:46 4:00 3:30 3:41 3:58 4:11 4:16 4:30 4:00 4:11 4:28 4:41 4:46 5:00 4:30 4:41 4:58 5:11 5:16 5:30 5:00 5:11 5:28 5:41 5:46 6:00 5;30 5;41 5:58 6:11 6'16 6:00 6:11 6:28 6:41 6:46 7:00 6:30 6:41 6:58 7:11 7:16 7:00 7:11 7:28 7:41 7:46 8:00 8:00 8,11 8:28 8:41 8:46 9:00 9:45 9:56 10:45 10:56 1 Weekends I Westbound to Cougar Way Saturday and Sunday A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate c o O �'2 0 m c G u m p O. m fa 3 o o �° a W O .= v, o � ar CO�, a 5 CO U o a aO ca Of fa Q om u @_J AM 0 CO ® 0 CO CI 8:00 8:11 8:28 8:41 8:46 9:00 9:00 9:11 9:28 9:41 9:46 10:00 10:00 10:11 10:28 10:41 10:46 11:00 11:00 11:11 11:28 11:41 11:46 12:00 PM 12:00 12:11 12:28 12:41 12:46 1:00 1:00 1:11 1:28 1:41 1:46 2:00 2:00 2:11 2:28 2:41 2:46 3:00 3:00 3:11 3:28 3:41 3:46 4:00 4:00 4:11 4:28 4:41 4:46 5:00 5:00 5;11 5:28 5:41 5:46 6:00 ROUTE 3 Info: (951) 769-85 30 Beaumont.doublemap.eom VineIan. Ave U ra Z Beaumont High School Transfer to Routes 11 Beaumont H. S. a7 a G O fa m Mt View Middle School CHERRY VALLEY Cherry Valley Market Beaumont Sports Park Cougar Way Transfer to Routes i 9 11 Scan QR Code below for all route information Legend I Map not to scale Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Orchard park Transfer to Routes w Cou • ar Way San G y Middle School a Chatigny Recreation Center 0 • k alley Pkwy Noble Creek Apartments Transfer to I 1 I 5 Routes J Stater Bros./Food 4 Less Transfer to Routes 1 5 Wal-Mart Transfer Station Transfer to Routes i 4 5 1120 RTA RTA 31 35 RTA 210 SUN 220 SUNDANCE Sundanae Elementary 8th 5t San Gorgonio Hospital x 6th�S_AM al 1 -Stater Bros. Q Food 4 Less 01 C �i a 2nd St a� E E 0 U 1st St m r San Gorgonio Hospital Transfer to Routes 1 4 5 11 07.16.2014 Rev. H.ivi. times are In r'i..HfIA, r.ivi. times are in BOLD 1 Tlmes are approximate 3 c t. ci c t �l- m'il R m c dj —Ras 03 VmU Cl S To To i To a -a� V. = a� o vUcm �� R a �z ro mca3 3 A M M 0 ® ® 0 ID 6:24 6:28 6:31 6:33 6:40 7:24 7:28 7:31 7:33 7:40 8:24 8:28 8:31 8:33 8:40 9:24 9:28 9:31 9:33 9:40 10:24 10:28 10:31 10:33 10:40 11:24 11:28 11:31 11:33 11:40 12:24 12:28 12:31 12:33 12:40 1:24 1:28 1:31 1:33 1:40 2:24 2:28 2:31 2:33 2:40 3:24 3:28 3:31 3:33 3:40 4:24 4:28 4:31 4:33 4:40 5:24 5:28 5:31 5:33 5:40 Weekdays] °Northbound to dherri y aria sulndianee and Beaumont WW1 Schoof 3 A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate f i R 3 'c c p.Q ��m O (.2= =o� „0 Offayj roa)d to uro'c" �746 3 R 6,ra 'six o'OL aS Ci.I � o �m s rd@�g, Isx u� m A M P M CI 0 0 4:0 411) 6:40 6:52 6:58 7:02 7:06 7:40 7:52 7:58 8:02 8:06 8:40 8:52 8:58 9:02 9:06 9:40 9:52 9:58 10:02 10:06 10:40 10:52 1 D:58 11:02 11:06 11:40 11:52 11:58 12:02 12:06 12:40 12:52 12:58 1:02 1:06 1:40 1:52 1:58 2:02 2:06 2:40 2:52 2:58 3:02 3:06 3'40 3:52 3:58 4:02 4:06 4:40 4:52 4:58 5:02 5:06 5:40 5:52 5:58 6:02 .— F:ROUTE FIXED Fare Categories FARES Base Fare Hare exarct Drivvers alannat Day Pass fare ready make change. 10-Tripper Punch Pass when bus arrives. NO REFUNDS 10-Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 N/A $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades K-12) $1.00 $3.00 $10.00 N/A $30.00 Senior (60+)** $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Disabled or Veteran** $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Child (46" tali or under) $.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone/Deviations $.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A GO Pass,ACtive Ameiginic:. Military and Active Jurors I RIDE FREE **If you plan to use a senior, disabled or military veteran discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Info: (951) 769-8530 Beaumont.doudlemap.com CHERRY VALLEY Vineland Ave Cherry ♦ Valley z Cherry;Valley Blvd Market 0 Beaumont H. S, Orchard Park Apts. Transfer to I 1 Routes Scan QR Code below for all route information B2mont ♦Sports Park `© Cougar Oay Brookside Ave Legend I Map not to scale Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Chatigny Recreation Oak Valley Pkwy Center ca AT. 1/1 41 a filth St Wal-Mart Transfer Station ; Transfer I to Routes 5 RTA 31 RTA 35 N C d X 6th Si Wa/- 2nd St iv 1st St fit:an Gorgonio aspifa/ d a in G! C L a. art c �v s Transfer to Routes San Gorgonio Hospital 1 I 5 04.13.2015 Rev. Weekends I Southbound to Wal-Mart 3 4 Saturday and Sunday only 4. TS co U R t m= 0, VIUaa Y 0 7 t 4N >. C coo-+ ini — co a+ o 0a! R i y U i U w ° " m c u t �i ' ,0 R 3 AM P M 0 4 1 4 0 8:00 8:04 8:08 8:12 8:20 9:00 9:04 9:08 9:12 9:20 10:00 10:04 10:08 10:12 10:20 11:00 11:04 11:08 11:12 11:20 12:00 12:04 12:08 12:12 12:20 1:00 1:04 1:08 1:12 1:20 2:00 2:04 2:08 2:12 2:20 3:00 3:04 3:08 3:12 3:20 4:00 4:04 4:08 4:12 4:20 Weekends' Northbound to Cherry Valley 3 4 Saturday and Sunday only A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate t ,o T ova— c c'�° o o'a o a) o U' +�+ U� c0 a m °G 1-a' c+' °'� U u � 3 m o a- 4 �,i� C �d V co o� U m m ka AM 1 0 0 ® 0 CI 8:20 8:35 8:39 8:43 8:47 9:00 9:20 9:35 9:39 9:43 9:47 10:00 10:20 10: 35 10:39 10:43 10:47 11:00 11:20 11:35 11:39 11:43 11:47 12: 00 P M 12:20 12:35 12:39 12:43 12:47 1:00 1:20 1:35 1:39 1:43 1:47 2:00 2:20 2:35 2:39 2:43 2:47 3:00 3:20 3:35 3:39 3:43 3:47 4:00 4:20 4:35 4:39 4:43 4:47 5:00 ROUTE 3/4 OFFERS NO DEVIATIONS WEEKEND SERVICE ONLY. ON ROUTE 3/4 FIXED ROUTE FARES i Have exact Drivers cannot fare ready retake change. when bus arrives. NO REFUNDS Fare Categories Base Fare Day Pass 10-Tripper Punch Pass 10-Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 NIA $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades K-12) $1 00 $3 00 $10 00 NIA $30 00 Senior (60f)** $.65 $1.80 NIA $5.85 $21.50 Disabled or Veteran** $ 65 $1 80 NIA $5.85 $21 50 Child (46" tall or under) $.25 NIA NIA NIA NIA GO Pass and Active Military I RIDE FREE **If you plan to use a senior, disabled or military veteran discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Info: (951) 799-85 30 RouTE 4 Beaumont.doublemap.eom Brool<sige Ave Beaumont Sports park Cougar Way/Orchard Park Transfer to Routes 1 3 7 9 ♦ 10th Street Beaumont Library • Pennzdvania AVP O Legend I Map not to scale Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Chatigny N Recreation Center ♦ 8th Street Wal-Mart Transfer Station Transfer to 11 1 3 + 5 1 9 Routes 31 35 210 220 San Gorgonio Hospital Transfer to Routes U1 Q rto En# 6th Street v c 1-120 EV 1st St Fare Categories Base Fare Day Pass 10-Tripper Punch Pass 10-Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 N/A $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades K-12) $1 00 $3.00 $10 00 N/A $30.00 Senior (60+)** $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Disabled or Veteran** $ 65 $1 80 N/A $5 85 $21.50 Child (46' tall or under) $.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone/Deviations $,25 N/A N/A N/A NIA CO Pass, Active Military and Active Jurors' RIDE FREE **If you plan to use a senior, disabled or military veteran discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounted passes/tickets. Rev. 08.14.2014 Weekdays I Downtown Beaumont 4 via three Rings Ranch and Wal-Mart A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD j Times are approximate AM PM }1t L �O d- 0 3 o — Q ca Q1ih 0 0 c� = ill a) U i C I- et o � L E g 0 a CO 0S RI � 0 ..� =03 cl) a t Gl 1p Q 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 —.— —. .— —.— 7:25 7:35 7:35 7:50 8:01 8:15 8:25 8:35 8:35 8:50 9:01 9:15 9:25 9:35 9:35 9:50 10:01 10:15 10:25 10:35 10:35 10:50 11:01 11:15 11:25 11:35 11:35 11:50 12:01 12:15 12:25 12:35 12:35 12:50 1:01 1:15 1:25 1:35 1:35 1:50 2:01 2:15 2:25 2:35 2:35 2:50 3:01 3:25 3:35 3:45 3:45 3:50 4:01 4:15 4:25 4:35 4:35 4:50 5:01 5:15 5:25 5:35 5:35 5:50 6:01 6:15 6:25 6:35 6:35 6:50 7:01 7:15 7:25 7:35 ROUTE 4 OFFERS WEEKDAY SERVICE ONLY. FOR WEEKEND SERVICE, PLEASE SEE ROUTE 314 COMBO MAP No service on Route 4: Weekends, New Year's Day, Memorial pay, Independence Day, labor Day, Thanks- giving Day and Christmas Day. Where's the bus? KN0Wwhen to scan 0cm dawEnlaad 'fie ar1 • • SH REAL-TIME " BUS TRACKING bea temontdoublema p.mm ROUTE Info: (95 I ) 769-85 30 7 Beaumont.doublemap.com N Legend I Map not to scale Time and/or Transfer Point T Transfer Point Beaumont High School Transfer 3 9 to Routes 11 ■ a Cherry Valley Blvd 2 � m z Brookside .ve - c o 8 SPle`dy'7 Monte Ve .e �r Cougar Way co �., Cougar Wa 41110 Transfer 1 3 7 / to Routes 9 11 ' T ? r ..�o Fie 3 ChamPloOS a .. ` 2 a = To aV Patkv+ L� ! trod va11e`l FAIRWAY C N • �ta'8 oak y Z �f�4s ,� �a I a el ' ar way IDScan Code below for all route information �■ ~—a�14-+Z ■ if. f. ' 4 • 41- ii°a ■ FIXED ROUTE Fare Categories FARES Base Fare i Have exact Drivers Day Pass ,Fare ready cannot make change. 10-Tripper Punch Pass when bus arrives. NO REFUNDS 10-Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 N/A $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades K-12) $1 00 $3 00 $10 00 N/A $30.00 Senior (60+)*- $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Disabled or Veterans** $ 65 $1 80 N/A $5.85 $21 50 Child (46" tail or under) $.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A GO Pass, Active Military and **If you plan to use a senior, disabled or veterans discounted you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase Active Jurors I RIDE FREE fare, you must show proper ID each time discounted passes/tickets. Rev. 10.08.2014 Tournament Hills and Fairway Canyon 7 also serving Staters and Rite -Aid shopping k.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate L C cu 'l 7o fg la �3J oa y 0 °� a, 'T EO 0- on ai .c Ey o. o f .= o E '°->. 2m t U G7 eo � °1 O0 oo Z A " _ � m >.@ °'-' vm ca w a 3 = ra = R m @1 �, `� °1 'a Taip ne O AM PM 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 6:35 6:42 6:48 6:53 6:58 7:00 7:05 7:10 6:40 6.47 6:53 6 58 7:03 7:08 7:18 7.23 7:15 7:22 7:28 7:33 7:38 7:45 7:50 7:25 7:27 7:33 7:38 7.43 7.53 7 58 — —.— —.— —.— —.— 3:05 .— 3:15 —.— —.— —. —.— —.— 3:10 —.— 3:20 .— —.— —. 3:20 3:30 3:40 3:20 3:30 3:35 3:40 3:46 —.— 3:50 3:55 3:25 3:35 3:40 3:45 3:50 —.— —. —.- 3:45 3:55 4:00 4:05 4:10 —.— —:— 4:00 4:10 4:15 4:20 4:25 —.— :— —.— PLEASE NOTE:: The symbol 99 indicates no service at that time I T SCHOOL IS IN SESSION ONLY No service on Route 7: Weekends, New Year's Day, Memorial oar, Independence Day, Labor Day, Colum- bus Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Dar, T KNOW when to doanbad SH Where's the bus? 5TY) PASSTRANSIT Ly EiEq�^ c.; REAL-TIME BUS TRACKING be■umontdoublemapcom Rev. 10.08.2014 ROUTE 9 Info: (951) 769-8530 Beaument.doublemap.eom Beaumont High School Beaumont High School Transfer to Routes 11 17 Mt. View Middle School WHERRY VALLEY Cougar Way/Orchard Park ' Transfer o r to Routes E 3 4 7 17 DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT Pennsylvania Ave/8th Street Transfer I 4 I li to Routes Scan Code be!ow for all route Legend I Map not to scale Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Alternate Route N Brownie Wa 1st Street x n_ _s .o �� 5 c.p 0 4, P. .. m Z Sens Q Parings Park ' �1� • •� '•� ii�G�c�4 ��� 4' � J' FIXED ROUTE FARES 1 Hare eact priversx fare read cannot make when bus arrives. ehan9e. MO REFUNDS Fare Categories Base Fare Day Pass 10-Tripper Punch Pass 10 Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 N/A $10.35 $36.00 Youth (grades K-12) $1 00 $3.00 $10 00 N/A $30 00 Senior (so+)** $.65 $1.80 NIA $5.85 $21.50 Disabled or Veteran*. $ 65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 Child (46" tall or under) $.26 N/A N/A N/A N/A CO Pass, Active Military and fare, purchase discounted Active Jurors I RIDE FREE **If you On to use a senior or disabled discounted the bus. You must also show proper ID to you must show proper ID each time you board passes/tickets. Rev. 11.18.2014 Effective January 5, 2015 Northbound I Seneca Springs to Cherry Valley via Pennsylvania Avenue A.M, times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD J Times are approximate AM :C3 >. c° 2� c3 2� o Ca f a a u aiu v 0a. IA a s ? 0 C c �0 as d a„ a CO UCa �� Eu= o eC coeat o°m=CI U 0 ® 0 , ® 0 6:35 6:40 6:45 6:55 7:00 7:30 7:35 7:40 7:50 —.— Southbound I Cherry Valley to Mica Springs via Pennsylvania Avenue A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD J Times are approximate AM PM d � o �@�o ���� Z' � 3 ` at Umm= � = 3 3� fC fa cnwa o ••= u) a� � eA = )> @j re E,.— as N i •_ = tam` i too. a� = of m = �vai �> ,y i� i o ILA O ® 0 0 0 0 7:00 7:10 7:15 7:30 7:35 —.- 3:05 3:10 3:15 3:25 3:30 3:33 -. 3:30 3:55 4:05 4:10 4:13 T ass KNOWwhen dow+�foad 77 i _ El L .r .: ill I11��• •r ry ■ ■ Whereas the bus? scfn PASSTRANSIT f. J SH,! �46, k i3Eq h� REAL-TIME BUS TRACKING beau montdou blemap.com V W Rev. 11.18.2014 Commuter Link 12 O 11"4' (95" 769-85" Beaumont.doublemap.iom Legend j Map not to scale • Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point Loma Unda VA Hospital Transfer to/from Routes RTA 14 Omni 2 Omni 202 Omni 325 C� + Benton St 1411k---11 Loma Linda VA Calimesa Hospital Carl`s Jr, Scan QR Code below for all route Information Beaumont Wal-Mart Beaumont Wal-Mart Transfer to/ from Routes 3 4 5 9 RTA 31 RTA RTA 35 210 SUN 220 San Bernardino w Metrolink Station 2. En M rtlewood Drive San Bernardino MetroLink Station Transfer to/ from Routes Omni 1 V+1TA 15 MARTA Big Bear Calimesa Stater Bros. Beaumont Civic Center/ Was Fargo I Transfer to/from + 1 !I Routes I I Magnolia Ave rt wBeaumont Civic �Center (Park N Ride) rt 5 R. Mo s€Wise on Commuter Link i 10: Weekends,' MewYear's Day, Memorial Day, Independence DayaLabor Day, Columbus D teran;s 'Day, �i nksgivin9 11y and Ciffli nlas say« Rev. 12.23.2014 ' Westbound' San Bernardino Metrolink 2 0 8349 General Fare each way A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD I Times are approximate Beaumont Wal-Mart Beaumont Civic Center Calimesa Blvd. @ Stater Bros. San Bernardino Metrolink Station Loma Linda Veteran's Hospital A M o e o o Q 5:35 5:40 6:20 6:40 7:10 7:15 7:25 7:50 8:15 8:50 8:55 9:05 9:30 9:55 P. M 12:00 12:05 12:15 12:55 1:15 2:00 2:05 2:15 2:55 3:15 4:00 4:05 4:15 4:55 5:15 6'00 6:05 6:15 6:55 .— ' 2 d Eastbound f Beaumont Wal-Mart S3.00., General fare each way A.M. times are in PLAIN, P.M. times are in BOLD f Times are approximate San Bernardino Metrolink Station Lorna Linda Veteran's Hospital Calimesa Blvd. @ Carl's Jr. fith St @ Wells Fargo Beaumont Wal-Mart A M P M 0 0 0 0 0 6:20 6:40 .— 7:05 7:10 7:50 8:15 8:30 8:40 8:45 9:30 9:55 10:10 10:20 10:25 12:55 1:15 1:30 1:40 1:45 2:55 3:15 3:30 3:40 3:45 4:55 5:15 5:30 5:40 5:45 6:55 7:20 7:25 E Fare Categories Base Fare General $3.00 Youth (grades K-12) $2.00 Senior (60+r $2.00 Disabled or Veteran** $2.00 Active Duty Military** FREE Child (46" tall or under) $2.00 **If you plan to use a discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. Please call (951) 769-8530 to inquire about proper ID. Beaumont Pass Transit does not accept free transfers from other bus agencies including RTA, OmniTrans and SunLine. The GoPass program is not valid on Commuter Link 120. Rev. 12.23.2014 Table of Contents Chapter 1 — System Overview Page 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Description of Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 4 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service 5 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure 7 1.5 Revenue Fleet 8 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities 8 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies 8 Chapter 2 — Existing Service and Route Performance 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Analysis 8 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance 10 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 10 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts 11 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth 12 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 12 Chapter 3 — Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 Recent Service Changes 13 3.2 Recommended Local & Express Route 13 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotions 13 3.4 Budget Impact and Proposed Changes 14 Chapter 4 — Financial and Capital Plans 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 14 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program 15 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 16 Table 1 — Fleet Inventory 18 Table 2 — Service Summary 20 Table 3 — Route Statistics 23 Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions and Area Served 25 Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 26 Table 5.1 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 29 Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 32 Table 6 — Progress Implementing Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations 34 Table 7 — Service Provider Performance Targets FY 2014/15 35 Table 8 — Performance Report FY 2015/16 36 Table 9 — City of Corona Transit Service Highlights FY 2015/16 37 Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data 37 Table 9B — Fare Revenue Calculation 38 Chapter 1 — System Overview 1.0 Introduction The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) sets the objectives and strategies for fiscal year (FY) 2015/16 for the City of Corona Transit Service (CCTS) by evaluating current transit system performance, projected demographic changes, operating and capital funding needs, anticipated funding from federal, state and local sources, and other factors to create a reasonable projection of conditions over the next three years (FY 2015/16 — 2017/18). 1.1 Description of Service Area The CCTS operates a general public, demand response Dial -A -Ride (DAR) and fixed route dubbed the 'Corona Cruiser.' DAR service commenced in 1977 and provides curb -to -curb service throughout the City of Corona and neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). The complementary paratransit Dial -A - Ride service area extends beyond city limits to ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) % mile corridor from a Corona Cruiser fixed route. Door-to-door service is available upon request for Dial -A -Ride riders certified under the ADA. Corona Cruiser fixed route began operating in 2001 and serves the city -center as well as commercial, retail, and residential areas on the eastern and southern portion of the city. See service maps on the following pages: 301.3/111:1 01 la6Jel . seuei a!ssen >ppsunlg . (Aw0) saloWA lopinj waLuVeda0 . (Oa!) 0601100 oo1oN . saoons le!ooS g 3!Ignd to waLuVedad . ooJON ue sa/hales solund/slu!Od al!IlaleS oaioN S1NIOd 3111131VS ® N31N �°no33xlCw �o 133L13 N1V 331 3D3110000110N Ell N31N30 11SNVL1 VNON00 l ANV8S11 3S NOIN3s 3b N31N30 V NOI1tl1111SVH3N 1VN01033 100HOS VNON00 H 1V11dSON ri NN110313N IOOHOS HOIH 31V103NN31N1 d 301N 8 NNVd 301ddO 1SOd NNVd V3tIV 301A213S 30121-V-1V10 VN02103 301s1n0 21001L12103 3111A1 4/E 3N113n113 213S1n210 VN02100NI= 3N11 0321213310210 VN02103 31111 0311213310213 VN02103 SOotll SOa 01301A213S AVaan1VS 331A213S dO SV321V A1Nn00 ANVON1108 VN02103 dO A110 . SN011V001 3111131VS 03L10N 11VH A113 8 3031100 00110N Ol af:ma-v-1m :SNOLLVN11S3C1 atha-`d-ivia `dNOUO3 aN393-I w 3oxvao of silty/®/ 11t3 / If30IA6./3 V'NO2/( 0 AlIJ 31J21IJ 3Hl 6COOH6 jo Ain SOOVI SOU IV SA0HS 3111 SONISS0313310. 301S213A18 O1 31VOS 0110N cIVIN 3140373M 3b111 S3)/I8 4f �O V1n03W31 O1 a� ® l�� 0 031, 000A 1.111VM s� i „r Onlo swvs 0 10d30 31N011—> 0 A3 MOW oavuuNvs a NOSla3elr as tlOS 010 01113d=. s3M01 a311,13011SNVa tlNOaO NOI1V1S NNI10a13W tlN02100 NNW H1a0N N 00aON Ol 33,10d 331 Nary NnoNN O SNOSla33ltl 0 s.laN3H 18 NOai10 lvix3wvaxn3 � bNaa00 y awn �Jl a31N30 11SNV211 VNOa00 l Aatla8ll 3S HOIN3S ANON 111H1003 1S 3A110 21311,130 N011V1111aVH3a 1VN010321 100H3S VNOa00 H 1V11dSOF1 100HOS HOIH 31V1031,0331N1 d 301a S NaVd Navd Les 3N11 3f119 213510210 VN02100WEE 3N11 0321 213S111210 VN02100 SOOVI SO0 01301A213S Av021f11VS NN1102113W 3013301S0d 11VH A110 :SNOLLVN11S34 tIV111d0d dN3J31 3AV 0121V1NO a31tl1S 0110.0113 a- tlNOWOd N011v1Moao oisALNA 1S aVOallV21 3N11 0321 213SIf1210 VN02100El u3SIflbo VNON00 A1N000 3ONtla0 O1 d b'W b'341/b' 301 13S Z/361nZ/0 b'NOWO 6'661 �H^11 c) Ai1 V J Ain 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections The CCTS serves a diverse population of 155,227 residents. The city encompasses 39 square miles. That diversity is reflected in the table below. City Population and Diversity Demographic Population Est. Percent Race Hispanic Total population 155,227 100% One race 148,949 96% Two or more races 6,278 4% One race 148,949 96% White 108,356 70% Black or African American 8,260 5% American Indian and Alaska Native 1,234 1% Asian 16,112 10% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1,214 1% Some other race 13,773 9% Two or more races 6,278 4% White and Black or African American 670 0.4% White and American Indian and Alaska Native 508 0.3% White and Asian 1,471 0.9% Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native 49 0.03% or Latino and Race Total population 155,277 100% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 66,176 43% Mexican 58,214 37% Puerto Rican 800 1% Cuban 790 0.5% Other Hispanic or Latino 6,372 4% Not Hispanic or Latino 89,051 57% White alone 59,729 38% Black or African American along 7,899 5% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 307 0.2% Asian alone 15,983 10% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 1,206 1% Some other race alone 477 0.3% Two or more races 3,450 2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013, 5-Year American Community Survey The table below lists passenger characteristics for Dial -A -Ride and Cruiser service. Passenger characteristic estimates are based on derived data compiled over the first nine months of FY 2014/15. Passenger Characteristics Dial -A -Ride Corona Cruiser Seniors / Persons with Disabilities 83.0% General Public 34.9% General Public 12.0% Seniors / Persons with Disabilities 29.6% Metrolink Transfers 2.6% Students 25.1% Personal Care Attendants 1.7% RTATransfers 6.1% Children 0.7% Children 3.3% Metrolink Transfers 1.0% 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service FY 2013/14 was a record setting year with the highest number of passenger trips recorded in both fixed route and Dial -A -Ride service than in any past year. System -wide passenger trips in FY 2013/14 totaled 238,597. This represents a 4.3% increase from the previous year's passenger trips of 228,689. Using passenger trips from the first nine months of FY 2014/15 as a basis for estimating annual totals, passenger trips may dip by 1.1 % over the recording setting total from FY 2013/14. Passenger trips are projected to rebound and grow slightly in FY 2015/16 (1.0%). Corona Cruiser — Blue and Red Lines The Blue Line serves the McKinley Street retail area then travels on to Magnolia Avenue and Main Street to the River Road area. This route passes by many trip generators such as hospitals, medical facilities, public service agencies, library, civic center, and commercial/retail areas. This route also serves the unincorporated area of Home Gardens. The Red Line connects the residential areas of central Corona with commercial areas along Sixth Street and the Ontario Avenue/California Avenue retail area. The Red Line also covers South Corona along Ontario Avenue/Temescal Canyon Road to serve the county area of El Cerrito and The Crossings shopping complex at Cajalco Road/Temescal Canyon Road and The Shops at Dos Lagos on Saturdays. The Cruiser schedule is: Blue Line Red Line Monday — Friday 6:42 a.m. — 7:09 p.m. 6:50 a.m. — 7:05 p.m. Saturday 8:52 a.m. — 3:50 p.m. 9:00 a.m. — 5:09 p.m. Sunday no service no service The Cruiser does not operate on the following holidays: New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day. Passenger trips on the Cruiser totaled 169,745 in FY 2013/14. Using the number of passenger trips provided during the first nine months of FY 2014/15 as a basis for estimating year-end totals, passenger trips may dip slightly (-0.1 %) compared to the record setting trips in FY 2013/14. With planned improvement to bus schedules, passenger trips are projected to rebound and increase slightly to 171,296 in FY 2015/16 (1.0%). The Cruiser serves the Corona Transit Center, owned and operated by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). The Corona Transit Center provides a safe and efficient transfer point between local and regional bus lines as well as regional commuter trains serving Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Trains are accessible via a pedestrian bridge to the adjacent North Main Corona Metrolink commuter rail station. To incentivize multimodal transportation, valid Metrolink pass -holders ride at no charge on Cruiser Blue and Red Lines to and from the Corona Transit Center. The CCTS and RTA have a reciprocal agreement that allows valid pass -holders a no cost, one way transfer between the Cruiser and RTA buses at bus stops served by both Cruiser and RTA buses. Transfers between bus systems are an effective way to promote public transit as a low cost, eco-friendly and stress -free alternative to automobile trips. 11��111 METROLINK. Corona Dial -A -Ride Alwareldo Traneii Agonq Dial -A -Ride provides service to the general public, seniors, persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for complementary paratransit service under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Reservations can be made from one to fourteen days in advance; however, same day service may be accommodated if space is available. Dial -A -Ride provides curb -to -curb service throughout the City of Corona and neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). Door-to-door assistance for ADA certified passengers is available upon request. Door-to-door service is available when: • Drivers can see the bus at all times; • The outermost door is within 150 feet from the bus; • Driver safety and security is maintained; and • Where a safe parking area is available. For individuals certified for ADA complementary service, service hours are expanded to match Cruiser hours. Passengers certified under the ADA receive priority service. Voicemail message reservations are accepted for ADA clients on Sundays and Holidays for next day service. The Dial -A -Ride schedule is: Monday — Friday ADA Complementary General Public Paratransit 6:42 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. 6:42 a.m. — 7:09 p.m. Saturday 8:52 a.m. — 5:09 p.m. 8:52 a.m. — 5:09 p.m. Sunday no service no service Dial -A -Ride service does not operate on the following holidays: New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day. Passenger trips taken on Dial -A -Ride in FY 2013/14 totaled 68,852, representing a 4.9% increase over the prior year, breaking the record set in FY 2012/13. Using data collected from the first nine months of FY 2014/15 as a basis for estimating year-end totals, passenger trips may decrease by 3.6% as compared to FY 2013/14. Although not at a record breaking pace, year-end estimates indicate the FY 2014/15 passenger will be the second highest on record. Passenger trips are projected to grow slightly in FY 2015/16 (1.0%). 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure The current fare structure appears below. Fare Structure Fare Type Fare Price Corona Cruiser Cash - General Public $1.50 Cash - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $0.70 Cash - Children (46" tall or under) $0.25 Day Pass - General Public $4.00 Day Pass - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $2.00 15-day Pass - General Public $17.50 15-day Pass - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $8.05 15-day Pass - Students $12.25 31-day Pass - General Public $35.00 31-day Pass - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $16.10 31-day Pass - Students $24.50 Dial -A -Ride General Public $4.00 Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $2.50 Children $0.50 Note: Current Fare Structure implemented July 5, 2010. To incentivize the use of public transit as a viable alternative to automobile trips, the CCTS is using Air Quality Management District (AQMD) funds to subsidize multi -day passes (15 day and 31 day passes) on the Cruiser. The use of these funds allows the CCTS to reduce the cost of multi -day passes by 30 percent for Cruiser riders but enables the CCTS to recover an adequate fare. 1.5 Revenue Fleet The CCTS owns a fleet of 16 light and medium -duty transit buses. All CCTS buses are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement for accessibility and wheelchair securement. The Dial -A -Ride fleet consists of 12 buses made up of 10 ElDorado National Aerotech 240s (these buses were placed into service in September and October 2012, with four buses powered with compressed natural gas (CNG) and six buses powered with gasoline) and two ElDorado National Aerotech 220s put into service in 2007 which are slated for replacement in FY 2015/16. A federal earmark with state matching funds has been allocated to replace these aging buses. All 12 buses can operate in fixed route service. Four CNG-powered medium -size, medium -duty ElDorado National AeroElite 320 buses are used in dedicated Cruiser service; two of the light duty buses augment the dedicated fleet in peak weekday service. The City plans on replacing these vehicles with seven low floor, purpose built CNG-powered buses in FY 2015/16. Two additional buses will be procured in FY 2015/16 to increase the spare ratio and accommodate future service expansion. With an aging fleet, longer down time due to repairs required CCTS to lease two light duty buses in FY 2014/15. These are short term leases which will end as new buses arrive in FY 2015/16. 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities The CCTS operates from a newer facility at 735 Corporation Yard Way. Transportation Concepts, the vendor retained to operate transit service, provides administrative and dispatching service from this location as well as fueling and vehicle parking. Maintenance is performed by the vendor at an off -site garage. 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies CCTS staff and Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) planning and operations staff are working together to identify workable solutions to transition some local fixed route service to the West Corona Metrolink Station currently provided by RTA Route 1 to a new Corona Cruiser route. CCTS and RTA are coordinating efforts to provide a one -seat ride for Corona residents to Norco College. Funding, efficacy, and efficiency issues are being jointly considered. Chapter 2 — Existing Service and Route Performance 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Analysis The CCTS operates the Cruiser along two fixed routes — the Blue Line and Red Line. As anticipated, FY 2013/14 was a record setting year. More passenger trips were provided in FY 2013/14 than any previous year. Using data gathered during July 2014-March 2015 as a basis for estimating passenger trips for FY 2014/15, it is estimated that the number of passenger trips provided in FY 2014/15 will nearly reach record -levels. Passenger trips on the Corona Cruiser are estimated at 169,600 a mere 0.1 % (145 trips) shy of last year's record breaking performance. Passenger Trips 180,000 160,000 140,000 12 0, 000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 Corona Cruiser Passenger Trips AS)1\ NS)lr� �otitilti� °tiylr�' °,,11ti� 1J �� �� �J F, A �O F �y Cruiser FY 2014/15 year-end estimates are based on data collected from July 2014-March 2015. "" FY 2015/16 projections are based on a one percent increase over estimated FY 2014/15 year-end totals. Passenger trips on the Blue Line are expected to dip by 1.0% or 897 trips in FY 2014/15 when compared to last year; this slight decrease is nearly offset by an increase of 0.9% or an additional 752 passenger trips on the Red Line. Overall, Corona Cruiser buses are projected to provide nearly the same number of passenger trips in FY 2014/15 as compared to last year's record setting performance. Passenger Trips Corona Cruiser Passenger Trips by Route 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 I y° titi r r tiD` h + < F, Blue Line Red Line FY 2014/15 year-end estimates are based on data collected from July 2014-March 2015. ** FY 2015/16 projections are based on a one percent increase over estimated FY 2014/15 year-end totals. 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance Demand for Dial -A -Ride service set a record with 68,852 passenger trips provided in FY 2013/14. Based on demand during the period of July 2014 to March 2015, passenger trips may decline by 3.6% in FY 2014/15. This dip in demand equates to 2,447 fewer trips for the year or 7.9 less trips per service day. At this juncture, it's not clear if this is a short-term anomaly or trend. CCTS staff will continue to monitor ridership trends. Passenger Trips 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Dial -A -Ride Passenger Trips ti°Qc)'�° ti°y°,�� �� ti°��'�� 1J F� �, 1� F, -k1,ti° F F, •DAR " FY 2014/15 year-end estimates are based on data collected from July 2014-March 2015. " FY 2015/16 projections are based on a one percent increase over estimated FY 2014/15 year-end totals. Senior citizens and people with disabilities represent 83.0% of total Dial -A -Ride passengers. General public and Metrolink riders make up 14.6% of riders. Due to higher fares ($4 instead of $2.50 for Senior/Disabled riders) general public and Metrolink riders contribute 22.0% of passenger fare revenue. 2.3 Key Performance Indicators The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) with fiduciary and administrative oversight of transit operators in Riverside County. Each year, RCTC reviews and approves the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) and allocates local, state and federal funding. To ensure productivity, RCTC developed and monitors eight performance indicators that measure productivity — these indicators and year-to-date performance are listed in the table below. By statute, transit operators serving urban areas must recover a minimum of 20.0% of operating cost through fare revenue. Fare revenue includes passenger fares, interest on investments, advertising revenue, local contributions and the proceeds from the sale of surplus vehicles. A farebox recovery ratio below 20.0% endangers the receipt of state funding. Farebox recovery ratio is a mandatory performance indicator. Transit operators must meet at least four of seven discretionary performance indicators to remain in good standing. Through the first nine months of FY 2014/15, CCTS has met the farebox ratio and six of seven discretionary indicators. These indicators appear on the next page. Performance Indicators Combining Corona Cruiser fixed route and Dial -A -Ride Performance Performance Indicators FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year -to -Date Performance Year -to -Date Performance Scorecard Mandatory: 1. Farebox recovery ratio >_ 20.0% 20.5% Meets Target Discretionary 1. Operating cost per revenue hour <_ $66.23 $69.31 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy per passenger >_ $5.55 and <_ $7.51 $7.43 Meets Target 3. Subsidy per passenger mile >_ $1.30 and <_ $1.76 $1.75 Meets Target 4. Subsidy per revenue hour >_ $43.43 and <_ $58.75 $55.10 Meets Target 5. Subsidy per revenue mile >_ $3.37 and <_ $4.57 $4.38 Meets Target 6. Passenger per revenue hour >_ 6.63 and <_ 8.97 7.40 Meets Target 7. Passengers per revenue mile >_ 0.52 and <_ 0.70 0.59 Meets Target Note: Data from RCTC TransTrack Table 7 for the period July 2014-March 2015. Through the third quarter of this fiscal year (July 2014-March 2015), CCTS met the mandatory farebox recovery ratio and six of seven discretionary performance indicators. The target set by RCTC for the operating cost per revenue hour is based on past performance and escalated by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). RCTC's target for FY 2014/15 is <_ $66.23; the plan submitted by CCTS for the same period was $67.91 as the cost of providing transit service (e.g., wages and benefits, fuel) increase faster than the CPI (which is approximately 0.96% as provided by RCTC). Table 7, Service Provider Performance Targets Report, appearing later in this plan, shows greater detail on FY 2014/15 performance targets and actual performance by indicator. Table 8, SRTP Performance Report, also appearing later in this plan, lists performance targets set by RCTC for FY 2015/16. Table 8 shows that CCTS met the mandatory farebox recovery ratio and six of seven discretionary targets. The target set by RCTC for the operating costs per revenue hour is $69.98. Cost increases for employee benefits (e.g., medical and retirement) and fuel, for example, increase faster than CPI (0.96%). Also contributing to the increase in cost per hour is increase cost to maintain low -floor buses. As noted earlier in Section 1.5, the CCTS is procuring seven low -floor buses. These are heavy duty, 12-year assets. To properly maintain these buses and ensure a full 12-year service life, additional maintenance costs will be incurred. The CCTS continues to contract with a private sector vendor to operate transit service to ensure a lower cost alternative than a city -operated service. 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts Productivity as measured by the number of passengers per revenue hour and revenue mile has remained relatively static on the Corona Cruiser for the last three years. While passengers per revenue mile has also remained relatively static, passengers per revenue hour has dipped in FY 2014/15. Along with all other vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians, Corona Cruiser and Dial-A- Ride buses are impacted by increased traffic congestion resulting from construction work on, and adjacent to, the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project. Freeway lane reductions and ramp closures, local street and lane closures, detours, and the movement of heavy equipment along SR-91 all increase congestion and impact traffic flow which slows buses. Slower speeds result in longer duration trips which impact productivity. See productivity measures in the table below. Mode Productivity Measure FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15* Corona Cruiser Passengers per revenue hour 10.80 11.60 11.70 11.60 Passengers per revenue mile 0.92 0.98 0.99 0.98 Dial -A -Ride Passengers per revenue hour 4.20 4.00 4.20 3.90 Passengers per revenue mile 0.30 0.29 0.31 0.29 *FY 201415 performance is measured covering the period July 2014 through March 2015. 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Major trip destinations within the city are the commercial/retail areas along McKinley Street and Sixth Street, The Crossings shopping area on Cajalco Road and Temescal Canyon, medical facilities along Magnolia Avenue, regional transit facilities off Main Street, the Corona Public Library, Senior Center and civic center. El Cerrito Middle School and Centennial High are also major trip generators. Cruiser patrons use the service for work, shopping trips, making stops at pharmacies and grocery stores, and accessing restaurants and movie theaters. Over the past two years, students have made up an increasing share of Corona Cruiser passengers. Many Dial -A -Ride passengers use the service to get to work and care centers, doctor visits and Corona's two Metrolink Stations. 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities, and Facility Needs The CCTS plans to continue adding and upgrading bus stops this year; improvements are as follows: • Make improvements at stops to ensure accessibility and service; • Install three passenger shelters; • Replace passenger benches to enhance accessibility; and • Enlarge the pick-up/drop-off area adjacent to a senior housing development to enhance Dial -A -Ride service. CCTS staff anticipates completing this work in the Summer 2015. The CCTS is committed to enhancing accessibility to Corona Cruiser bus stops for all passengers. As such, the CCTS will seek grant funding each year to continue bus stop enhancements and ensure stops are accessible to all passengers. Chapter 3 — Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 Recent Service Changes No service changes were implemented during FY 2014/15. 3.2 Recommended Local & Express Route Modifications CCTS staff is proposing the following service enhancements in FY 2015/16: • Adjust trip times — CCTS staff is proposing to adjust Red Line and Blue Line scheduled (weekday) trip times to reflect actual trip times. Trip times will also be adjusted to accommodate increased congestion anticipated during SR-91 construction. Additional Dial -A -Ride service is proposed to address increasing trip times due to construction activities. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion Increasing ridership is another way to augment passenger fares. The CCTS staff is looking at strategies to increase Cruiser ridership. These marketing strategies include: o Videos focused on how to ride public transportation — in cooperation with RTA's Northwest T-NOW Chapter, CCTS staff organized a video contest as a follow-up to last year's successful program. Videos will be presented to community groups to inform citizens about the various transit options available in the Northwest region of Riverside County and encourage their use. o Bus Shelter Program — the CCTS will be installing three additional shelters at Cruiser bus stops. Shelters provide bus patrons with relief from the sun during hot days and protection from rain during inclement weather. These shelters feature seating for six, an area for a person with a mobility device/wheelchair, and solar -powered dusk -to -dawn security lighting. These new shelters act as a destination for bus passengers and as an ambassador as to how public transit can beautify a neighborhood and itself function as marketing tool inviting motorist to try public transit. o Poetry on the Bus Program — in cooperation with Centennial High, Corona High and Lee Pollard High, CCTS conducted its sixth successful poetry contest inviting students to submit original poetry to be displayed on the interior of Cruiser buses. Selected poems are rotated each month. The program works as an outreach effort and marketing campaign at high schools while providing a creative outlet for students. Cruiser patrons are rewarded with expressive, introspective, and entertaining poems to read and ponder during their time on the bus. o Art on the Bus Program — replicates the Poetry on the Bus Program but broadens it to include student artwork. This program completed five annual cycles and incorporates artwork from high school students. o Transit 101 — continue to present an introduction to public transit to promote use of the Corona Cruiser Blue and Red lines and its connection to regional bus and rail service. CCTS staff has made the presentation at the Corona Senior Center and Valencia Terrace and Corona Community Villas — senior housing developments. 3.4 Budget Impact and Proposed Changes While progress has been made, recovery from the "Great Recession" has been slow. The CCTS relies on a contribution from the City's general fund to meet the mandatory farebox recovery ratio (mandate to recover 20 percent of operating costs through fare revenue). However, the City's general fund continues to reflect a sluggish regional economy. As such, the CCTS is stretching funding to increase some Corona Cruiser trip times and longer duration Dial -A -Ride trips to accommodate increased congestion from SR-91 construction activities. Favorable pricing for contract operator service hours secured in a competitive bid process in June 2013, slowed cost growth of Dial -A -Ride and Corona Cruiser service and allowed for this conservative proposal for additional service hours. Chapter 4 — Financial and Capital Plans 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget To continue to provide Corona Cruiser fixed route and Dial -A -Ride service, the CCTS is proposing a balanced budget of $2.3 million for FY 2015/16, representing 5.1 % increase ($113,680) over the current year budget. Increases in fuel costs are largely driven by anticipated increases in fuel consumption with larger buses (10.4% or $27,150) and administrative benefits (4.8% or $17,622) are partially offset by decreases in materials, marketing and utilities (-10.9% or-$7,804). Increases in contracted service costs (5.0% or $76,712) are driven by additional Dial -A -Ride and Cruiser service and to accommodate increased maintenance costs for low -floor, purpose built CNG buses. New in FY 2015/16 is funding for vehicle maintenance inspection services, also a cost contributor to contract services ($19,230). Please see Budget by Category and Mode on the following page: Budget by Category and Mode Category Mode FY 2014/15 SRTP FY 2015/16 Plan Variance $ % Salaries & Benefits Dial -A -Ride Fixed Route 200,904 212,195 11,291 5.6% Subtotal 167,391 173,722 6,331 3.8% 368,295 385,917 17,622 4.8% Materials, Marketing and Utilities Dial -A -Ride 34,815 30,936 (3,879) -11.1% Fixed Route 36,624 32,699 (3,925) -10.7% Fuel Subtotal 71,439 63,635 (7,804) -10.9% Dial -A -Ride 141,750 145,800 4,050 2.9% Fixed Route 120,000 143,100 23,100 19.3% Subtotal 261,750 288,900 27,150 10.4% Contracted Services Dial -A -Ride 861,309 901,460 40,151 4.7% Fixed Route 672,629 709,190 36,561 5.4% Total Subtotal 1,533,938 1,610,650 76,712 5.0% Dial -A -Ride Fixed Route 1,205,265 1,030,157 1,251,918 46,653 3.9% 1,097,184 67,027 6.5% Subtotal $2,235,422 $2,349,102 $113,680 5.1% 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program The CCTS is proposing a funding plan that includes state funding (Local Transportation Fund) to support 80 percent of operating costs. The remaining 20 percent will be generated by passenger fares, bus shelter advertising and local funds. The CCTS will use Proposition 1 B/Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement & Service Enhancement Program and Prop 1 B/California Transit Security Grant Program funding to cover proposed capital purchases in FY 2015/16. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Half Fare During Non -Peak Hours According to federal statute, transit operators must allow 1) elderly persons, 2) persons with disabilities, and 3) Medicare card holders to ride fixed route service during off-peak hours for a fare that is not more than one-half the base fare charged to other persons during peak hours. The base fare for Cruiser service is $1.50 during peak and non -peak hours. The fare for an elderly person (60+), a person with disabilities and Medicare cardholders is $0.70 throughout the service day. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The ADA requires that complementary paratransit service be available to ADA certified persons during the same hours and days of operation available to Cruiser (fixed route) passengers. Complementary paratransit service must be provided within % of a mile corridor from each side of a fixed route. The CCTS operates a general population Dial -A -Ride that extends beyond the % mile corridor to the city limits, into the county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). When demand exceeds capacity, requests for service from ADA certified passengers receive priority. As such, the CCTS maintains zero denials for ADA certified passengers. Provision of Service - ADA complementary paratransit must be provided to an ADA eligible individual, including those with temporary eligibility, a personal care attendant (PCA) if necessary, and one other individual accompanying the ADA-eligible individual, if requested. Additional companions may be provided service, if space is available. Service also must be provided to visitors. Any visitor who presents ADA eligibility documentation from another jurisdiction must be provided service. Type of Service — The ADA specifies "origin to destination" service. In certain instances, this might require service beyond strict curb -to -curb. Door-to-door assistance for ADA certified passengers is available upon request. Door-to-door service is available when: • Drivers can see the bus at all times; • The outermost door is within 150 feet from the bus; • Driver safety and security is maintained; and • Where a safe parking area is available. Fares — The ADA complementary paratransit fare cannot exceed twice the fare for a trip of similar length, at a similar time of day, on the Cruiser (fixed route system). No fares may be charged for Personal Care Attendants (PCAs). ADA certified individuals are charged $2.50 per trip which is less than twice the fare for a trip on the Cruiser ($1.50 x 2 = $3.00). A companion is charged $2.50 per trip as well. Title VI In compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no person on the basis of race, color, or national origin, is excluded from participation in, or is denied the benefits of, or is subjected to discrimination within the scope of services offered by the CCTS. The following notification to passengers of their right to file a complaint is included on the City of Corona website, service brochures, and posted on -board CCTS buses. No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity of the City of Corona Transit Service (CCTS). The Public Works Director is the CCTS Title VI Compliance Officer. For more information, or to file a Title VI Civil Rights compliant contact the Corona Public Works Department by telephone at (951) 736-2266, by email at publwks@ci.corona.ca.us, or by visiting the Public Works Department at 400 S. Vicentia Avenue, Suite 210, Corona, CA 92882. The CCTS Title VI program is valid through July 2015, at which time a revised program will be in effect for a three-year period. The CCTS has not received any Title VI complaints. Transportation Development Act Triennial Audit The CCTS underwent a Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Performance Audit in January 2014 covering fiscal years 2009/10 through 2011/12. CCTS staff is anticipating the next triennial audit to take place in late 2015 or early 2016. Federal Transit Administration Triennial Review A Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Triennial Review field review for the period of 2011-2013 was completed in July 2014. The FTA recommended corrective action in the following areas: • Maintenance Plan — create a maintenance plan that establishes goals and objectives and describes a system of periodic inspections for FTA funded vehicles and facilities; • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) — monitor limits or capacity constraints when providing ADA complementary paratransit service; document oversight of Riverside Transit Agency's (RTA) certification and eligibility activities for Corona residents, and ensure that any No -Show policy only suspends riders who have established a true pattern or practice of missing scheduled trips and only imposes suspensions for a reasonable period of time; and • Procurement — augmenting policies and procedures to ensure Buy America and Brooks Acts requirements are included in purchasing procedures. The FTA is currently reviewing corrective action plans submitted by CCTS staff that address these recommendations. National Transit Database The National Transit Database (NTD) approved CCTS' request to submit transit financial and performance data through a Small Systems Waiver starting in report year 2011; the waiver is available to transit providers operating 30 or fewer buses. The submission date for Report Year 2014 was pushed from October 30, 2014 to January 30, 2015 to accommodate NTD's transition to a new online reporting system. CCTS staff has provided responses and clarification to NTD reviewers following the initial review. Close out of Report Year 2014 should quickly follow. Alternative Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policy) The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) encourages all Riverside County transit operators to transition from diesel -powered transit buses to alternative fuel buses. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) are recognized as preferred options. The CCTS currently runs a mixed fleet of gasoline and CNG-powered buses. Ten new Dial -A -Ride buses replaced aging buses in September and October 2012. As planned, four of these buses are powered with Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). While gasoline is a recognized alternative fuel for demand response/Dial-A-Ride buses, the CCTS integrated CNG-powered Dial -A -Ride buses with funding through the federal government's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) program. The CCTS anticipates retiring its existing fleet of Cruiser buses in December 2015. Each replacement bus will remain CNG-powered. t.wilet rirLrrFirrliai irrrbr Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan City of Corona Year Built Mfg. Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active # of Vehicles Contingency FY Vehicles 2014/15 FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2006 EDN AeroElite 2007 STR Starlite 30 16 4 2 33 25 CN GA 4 2 0 0 927,868 984,967 184,206 246,242 92,103 Totals: 46 6 6 0 927,868 1,169,173 194,862 TransTrack Manager'"' Page 1 of 2 4/30/2015 t.wilet rirLrrFirrliai irrrbr Demand Response / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan City of Corona Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2007 2012 2012 EDN EDN EDN AeroTech AEROTECH AEROTECH 16 20 20 2 6 4 24 26 26 GA GA CN 2 6 4 0 0 0 438,952 336,235 249,181 470,664 479,380 271,444 235,332 79,897 67,861 Totals: 56 12 12 0 1,024,368 1,221,488 101,791 TransTrack Manager'"' Page 2 of 2 4/30/2015 MIEN MM•� IiN � fomql.oepzmirn6rmiskn Table 2 -- City of Corona -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 15 15 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $2,039,098 $2,042,898 $2,235,422 $1,653,566 $2,349,102 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $412,858 $409,812 $447,087 $338,970 $469,821 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,626,240 $1,633,086 $1,788,335 $1,314,596 $1,879,281 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 228,689 238,597 241,082 177,004 238,365 Passenger Miles 972,292 1,016,818 1,027,070 752,954 1,013,976 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 30,248.1 30,810.7 32,915.0 23,856.7 33,000.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 393,076.0 395,068.0 422,875.0 299,971.0 413,922.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 431,811.0 441,761.0 471,600.0 338,638.0 466,675.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.41 $66.30 $67.91 $69.31 $71.18 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.25% 20.06% 20.00% 20.50% 20.00% Subsidy per Passenger $7.11 $6.84 $7.42 $7.43 $7.88 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.67 $1.61 $1.74 $1.75 $1.85 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $53.76 $53.00 $54.33 $55.10 $56.95 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.14 $4.13 $4.23 $4.38 $4.54 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 7.6 7.7 7.3 7.4 7.2 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.58 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.58 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 4/30/2015 Page 1 of 1 MIEN MM•� IiN � fvmqlmspzmim6umRsim Table 2 -- Corona -BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 6 6 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $951,036 $892,738 $1,030,157 $752,630 $1,097,184 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $191,440 $179,780 $206,033 $158,783 $219,437 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $759,596 $712,958 $824,124 $593,847 $877,747 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 163,054 169,745 171,830 127,200 171,296 Passenger Miles 642,148 670,493 678,731 502,440 676,619 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 14,041.4 14,516.3 15,957.0 10,993.7 16,000.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 165,926.0 171,390.0 188,093.0 129,431.0 188,533.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 177,563.0 185,716.0 203,321.0 141,485.0 206,114.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.73 $61.50 $64.56 $68.46 $68.57 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.13% 20.14% 20.00% 21.10% 20.00% Subsidy per Passenger $4.66 $4.20 $4.80 $4.67 $5.12 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.18 $1.06 $1.21 $1.18 $1.30 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $54.10 $49.11 $51.65 $54.02 $54.86 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.58 $4.16 $4.38 $4.59 $4.66 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 11.6 11.7 10.8 11.6 10.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.98 0.99 0.91 0.98 0.91 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 4/30/2015 Page 1 of 1 MIEN MM•� IiN � fomql.oepzmirn6rmiskn Table 2 -- Corona-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 9 9 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,088,063 $1,150,160 $1,205,265 $900,936 $1,251,918 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $221,419 $230,032 $241,054 $180,187 $250,384 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $866,644 $920,128 $964,211 $720,749 $1,001,534 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 65,635 68,852 69,252 49,804 67,069 Passenger Miles 330,144 346,326 348,339 250,514 337,357 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 16,206.7 16,294.4 16,958.0 12,863.0 17,000.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 227,150.0 223,678.0 234,782.0 170,540.0 225,389.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 254,248.0 256,045.0 268,279.0 197,153.0 260,561.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.14 $70.59 $71.07 $70.04 $73.64 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.35% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% Subsidy per Passenger $13.20 $13.36 $13.92 $14.47 $14.93 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.63 $2.66 $2.77 $2.88 $2.97 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $53.47 $56.47 $56.86 $56.03 $58.91 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.82 $4.11 $4.11 $4.23 $4.44 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.9 3.9 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.29 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.30 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 4/30/2015 Page 1 of 1 ��MME�� iooryl.oep:mim�ormiskn Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Corona -- 3 FY 2015/16 All Routes Peak Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy COR-BLUE Total 3 87,571 345,905 7,840.0 8,255.0 93,717.0 99,763.0 $537,620 $107,524 $430,096 COR-DAR Total 9 67,069 337,357 17,000.0 19,463.0 225,389.0 260,561.0 $1,251,918 $250,384 $1,001,534 COR-RED Total 3 83,725 330,714 8,160.0 8,655.0 94,816.0 106,351.0 $559,564 $111,913 $447,651 Service Provider Totals 15 238,365 1,013,976 33,000.0 36,373.0 413,922.0 466,675.0 $2,349,102 $469,821 $1,879,281 TransTrack Manager"' 4/30/2015 Page 1 of 2 Zdo Z a6ed SIOZ/0£/b ,„Ja6eueN vausueal 85'0 Z'L b5'b$ 56'95$ 58'T$ 88'L$ %00'0Z 98'6$ 89'5$ 8T'TL$ sle;oy aapinoad ealnaag 88'0 £'0T ZL'b$ 98'1,5$ 0£'0 6'£ WV$ T6'85$ £6'0 Z'TT 65'14 98'175$ S£'T$ L6'Z$ VZ'T$ S£'S$ £6173 T6'14 %00.0Z %00.0Z %00.0Z 89'9$ L9'8T$ vv9$ 06'S$ SS'S$ VC'S$ LS'89$ b9'£L$ LS'89$ poi a321-21O3 le;ol ava-aoo le;ol 3f118-aO0 allW aad anoH gad al!W sae6uassed saa6uessed enuanay aad Aplsgng anoH allW anuenaa aa6uessed aad Aplsgng aad Aplsgns aa6uassed aad Aplsgng of;ea aa6uassed aavi anuanaa AaaAOJaa aad ;so3 aad ;sop xogamA 6upeaed0 anoH anuana2l adAy Aea # a;nob aad ;sop 6ul;eaadp sao;ep!puI aauewaojaad sa;nob Iltl 9T/STOZ Ad £ -- euoaop;o AID sopspe;s ainob d1dIS - £ a/9e1 Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions and Area Serviced Mode Route Description Area / Sites Service Corona Cruiser Blue Line The Crossings shopping area at Cajalco Road and Temescal Canyon to the El Tapatio at West Sixth Street via downtown / Civic Center The Crossings shopping area, Walmart, California Avenue Post Office, Centennial High, Corona Transit Center/North Main Corona Metrolink Station (selected AM & PM trip), Corona Library, Senior Center, Civic Center, Corona High and on west Sixth Street near Smith Avenue (service is extended to the Shops at Dos Lagos on Saturdays) Red Line Wal-Mart at McKinley Street west to River Run Apartments via Mountain Gate Park and downtown / Civic Center McKinley Street shopping areas, Magnolia Avenue, Centennial High, medical facilities, Senior Center, Corona Library, Corona Transit Center/North Main Corona Metrolink Station, Fender museum, north Main Street shopping area and restaurants Dial -A -Ride City-wide Demand response / reservation based service City-wide, neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the city of Norco - Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 City of Corona Project Description Capital Project No. Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1B Security CTSGP Prop 1B Capital PTMISEA AQMD AB 2766 Subvention Funds Fare Box* Other ** FY 16 - Operating Revenues 2,349,103 1,879,282 389,051 80,770 Subtotal: Operating $2,349,103 $1,879,282 - - - - $389,051 $80,770 Six Type C Replacement Buses (Prop 1B PTMISEA FY 2014/15) Security Lighting at Bus Stops (Prop 1B CTSGP FY 2012/13 and FY 2013/14) FY 16 01 FY 16 02 522,723 79,125 79,125 522,723 Subtotal: Capital $601,848 - - $79,125 $522,723 - - - Total: Operating & Capital $2,950,951 $1,879,282 - $79,125 $522,723 - $389,051 $80,770 * Includes AB 2766 congestion and emission reduction funds to incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes ($13,000) ** Operating - Other revenues include bus shelter advertising ($14,000) and City contribution ($66,770). FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: FY 16-01 FTIP No: not applicable PROJECT NAME: Replacement Type C Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase six replacement cutaway buses for Dial -A -Ride service. These buses will be powered with gasoline. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: CCTS put into service ten Type C buses in 2012. These buses have a service life of five years or a minimum of 150,000 miles, whichever comes first. The useful life of six of these buses will be reached November 2016. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date January 2016 November 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Funding has been requested through the Proposition 1 B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) state bond program with concurrence from the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount Prop 1 B PTMISEA FY 2014/15 $522,723 Total $522,723 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/16) CA-04-0237 RIV091210 12-01 Two replacement Type C buses $260,000 Not applicable Not applicable 14-01 Seven low floor buses $3,319,815 Not applicable Not applicable 15-03 Two Type E buses $300,000 FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 16-02 FTIP No: not applicable PROJECT NAME: Security Lighting at Bus Stops PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The CCTS is proposing to install pole -mounted, solar powered security lighting at Corona Cruiser bus stops. Lighting equipment will be passenger -activated and will light the area around a bus stop for a pre -determined time. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Many bus stops along the Corona Cruiser Red and Blue Lines are not well lit. Passengers using bus service during evening/night and morning hours must wait at stops in low -light or dark conditions. The installation of bus stop lighting will enhance security by illuminating passengers waiting for the bus. Lighting will increase visibility of passengers and the area surrounding the bus stop. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date March 2016 Completion Date June 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): CCTS has secured funding through the Proposition 1 B California Transit Security Grant Program (CTSGP). Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount Prop 1 B CTSGP FY 2012/13 $39,571 Prop 1 B CTSGP FY 2013/14 $39,554 Total $79,125 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/15) Not applicable Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 City of Corona Project Description Capital Project No. Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1B Security CTSGP Prop 1B Capital PTMISEA AQMD AB 2766 Subvention Funds Fare Box* Other ** Operating Revenues 2,459,265 1,954,453 427,956 76,856 Subtotal: Operating $2,459,265 $1,954,453 - - - - $427,956 $76,856 Passenger Shelter Fabrication, Site Improvement, and Installation Four Type C Replacement Buses FY 17-01 FY 17-02 600,000 360,000 600,000 270,000 90,000 Subtotal: Capital $960,000 - $870,000 - - $90,000 - - Total: Operating & Capital $3,419,265 $1,954,453 $870,000 - - $90,000 $427,956 $76,856 * Includes AB 2766 congestion and emission reduction funds to incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes ($12,792). ** Other revenues include bus shelter advertising ($15,288) and City contribution ($61,568). FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 17-01 FTIP No: not applicable PROJECT NAME: Passenger Shelter Fabrication, Site Improvement, and Installation PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Bus stop shelters provide patrons with shelter during inclement weather and shaded respite from the sun. Shelters also provide lighting for convenience and enhance passenger safety. Bus shelter advertising contributes to the CCTS' farebox recovery requirement, which helps offset the cost of Corona Cruiser fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The CCTS' existing shelters that accommodate advertisement have reached their service life and need replacement. Replacement shelters will maintain the current revenue stream as well as improve bus stop esthetics and provide solar -powered, dusk - to -dawn security lighting. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date January 2016 December 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): CCTS is requesting State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds from Riverside County Transportation Commission. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2016/17 $600,000 Total $600,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/16) Not applicable FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: FY 17-02 FTIP No: not applicable PROJECT NAME: Replace Type C Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase four replacement cutaway buses for Dial -A -Ride service. These buses will be powered with gasoline. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: CCTS put into service ten Type C buses in 2012. These buses have a service life of five years or a minimum of 150,000 miles, whichever comes first. The useful life of four of these buses will be reached November 2017. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date January 2017 November 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): CCTS is requesting State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds from Riverside County Transportation Commission. Special funding through the South Coast Air Quality District (AQMD) to reduce mobile source emission will contribute to the purchase of buses. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2016/17 $270,000 AQMD AB 2766 Subvention Funds FY 2016/17 $90,000 Total $360,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/16) Not applicable Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 City of Corona Project Description Capital Project No. Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1B Security CTSGP Prop 1B Capital PTMISEA AQMD AB 2766 Subvention Funds Fare Box* Other ** Operating Revenues 2,557,636 2,032,631 I - - - I I 445,074 79,930 Subtotal: Operating $2,557,636 $2,032,631 - - - $445,074 $79,930 Bus Stop Improvement/ADA Accessibility FY 18 - 1 120,000 - 100,000 - 20,000 - Subtotal: Capital $120,000 - $100,000 - - $20,000 - - Total: Operating & Capital $2,677,636 $2,032,631 $100,000 - - $20,000 $445,074 $79,930 * Includes AB 2766 congestion and emission reduction funds to incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes ($13,303). ** Other revenues include bus shelter advertising ($15,900) and City contribution ($64,031). FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 18-01 FTIP No: not applicable PROJECT NAME: Bus Stop Improvement/ADA Accessibility PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Corona Cruiser serves 185 bus stops along two routes — the Red and Blue Lines. This project will provide funding to improve ADA accessibility, maintain bus stop furniture and equipment in a proper and safe manner and provide funding to place additional stops as demand warrants. This project is a multi-year/on-going activity. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Either installing new accessible bus stops or upgrading existing stops to improve accessibility and/or removing barriers to accessibility ensures all bus patrons have equal access to Corona Cruiser service. Project funding will enable the City to maintain benches, signs, kiosks and shelters in proper and safe condition. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date January 2018 December 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): CCTS is requesting State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds from Riverside County Transportation Commission. Special funding through the South Coast Air Quality District (AQMD) to reduce mobile source emission will contribute to this project. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2017/18 $100,000 AQMD AB 2766 Subvention Funds FY 2017/18 $20,000 Total $120,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) Not applicable Not applicable 14-04 Bus stop/ADA improvement project $50,000 Not applicable Not applicable 15-05 Bus stop/ADA improvement project $75,000 Table 6 — Progress Implementing Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations Audit Recommendations Action / Remedy Maintenance Plan The CCTS has ten FTA funded buses and two FTA funded facilities, a CNG fueling station and administration building. CCTS staff has submitted a maintenance plan for FTA review that establishes goals and objectives and describes a system of periodic inspections and preventive maintenance to be performed at certain defined intervals. Americans with Disabilities Act The CCTS is responsible for ensuring that its ADA complementary paratransit service (a priority service within Corona's Dial -A -Ride service) is operated without a pattern or practice of capacity constraints (missed trips, untimely pickups, and excessive trip lengths). CCTS collects some service performance information but often it is comingled with non ADA service data. In response, CCTS now collects and monitors trip denials, missed trips, and excessive trip lengths for ADA paratransit trips. RTA provides ADA certification and eligibility for all public transit operators in western Riverside County. CCTS does not have documented oversight procedures to monitor RTA's certification eligibility activities. In collaboration with RTA, CCTS has submitted to the FTA an oversight plan. CCTS has a No -Show policy but does not enforce it nor suspends riders for excessive no-shows. The FTA emphasized that a no-show policy must only suspend passengers who have a established a true pattern or practice of missing scheduled trips. CCTS will update its policy prior to any future implementation. Procurement CCTS has revised the Purchasing Policy and Procedures Manual to include a description of the requirements for the procurement of Architectural and Engineering (A&E) services in accordance with the Brooks Act. The manual was also updated with procedures that ensure Buy America pre -award and/or post - delivery audits are performed for revenue rolling stock procurements. I .ri riy Lrpirrliai irrir"mim Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Corona Data Elements FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 241,082 Passenger Miles 1,027,070 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 32,915.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 422,875.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 471,600.0 Total Operating Expenses $2,235,422 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $447,087 Net Operating Expenses $1,788,335 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 20.00% I >= 20.00% I 20.50% I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $67.91 <= $66.23 $69.31 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $7.42 >= $5.55 and <= $7.51 $7.43 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile I $1.74 >= $1.30 and <= $1.76 $1.75 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $54.33 >= $43.43 and <= $58.75 $55.10 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.23 >= $3.37 and <= $4.57 $4.38 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 7.30 >= 6.63 and <= 8.97 7.40 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.57 >= 0.52 and <= 0.70 0.59 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: I TransTrack Manager'"' 4/30/2015 Page 1 of I MIEN MM•� IiH c rimy 1.mspirdim farmisim FY 2015/16 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; City of Corona All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2013/14 End of Year Actual FY 2014/15 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2015/16 Plan FY 2015/16 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 238,597 177,004 238,365 None Passenger Miles 1,016,818 752,954 1,013,976 None Revenue Hours 30,810.7 23,856.7 33,000.0 None Total Hours 33,749.7 26,345.5 36,373.0 None Revenue Miles 395,068.0 299,971.0 413,922.0 None Total Miles 441,761.0 338,638.0 466,675.0 None Operating Costs $2,042,898 $1,653,566 $2,349,102 None Passenger Revenue $409,812 $338,970 $469,821 None Operating Subsidy $1,633,086 $1,314,596 $1,879,281 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $66.30 $69.31 $71.18 <_ $69.98 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $5.17 $5.51 $5.68 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $8.56 $9.34 $9.86 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.06% 20.50% 20.00% >= 20.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $6.84 $7.43 $7.88 >_ $6.32 and <_ $8.54 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $1.61 $1.75 $1.85 >_ $1.49 and <_ $2.01 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $53.00 $55.10 $56.95 >_ $46.84 and <_ $63.37 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $4.13 $4.38 $4.54 >_ $3.72 and <_ $5.04 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 7.70 7.40 7.20 >= 6.29 and <= 8.51 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.60 0.59 0.58 >= 0.50 and <= 0.68 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2015/16 Plan to the FY 2015/16 Primary Target. TransTrack Manger' 4/3opois Page 1 of 1 Table 9 — CCTS Highlights FY 2015/16 Operations o Implement schedule adjustment: o Adjust Corona Cruiser bus schedule to reflect longer trips due to increasing congestions during the SR-91 expansion project. o Continue to work with the Corona Norco Unified School District to identify times and locations where the Corona Cruiser can transport students commuting between home and school if state funding for school busing is further constrained. o Promote alternative modes of transportation by improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Identify new sidewalk and in -fill needs as well as expanding the bicycle route network. Pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements make these modes of transportation a viable option to automobiles and improves access to public transportation. o Continue to survey bus stops to enhance accessibility. Capital Projects o Test and accept delivery of seven low -floor, purpose built transit buses. o Complete bus stop enhancement and accessibility improvements. o Procure eight replacement Dial -A -Ride buses and two medium duty fixed route buses. Table 9A Performance Measure FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Est. FY 2015/16 Planned System -wide Passenger Trips 215,068 228,689 238,597 236,005 238,365 Cost per Service Hour $67.02 $67.41 $66.30 $69.31 $71.18 Table 9B — Farebox Revenue Calculation (Consistent with Riverside County Transportation Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Farebox Recovery Ratio Revenues FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Est. FY 2015/16 Plan Passenger Fares $370,007 $373,031 $376,051 Interest Income $4,361 $0 $0 General Fund Contribution $5,000 $48,784 $66,770 Measure A $0 $0 $0 Passenger Shelter Advertising Revenue $14,473 $12,618 $14,000 Gain on Sale of Capital Assets $1,465 $0 $0 CNG Revenues $0 $0 $0 Lease/ Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 Federal Excise Tax Refund $0 $0 $0 Investment Income $0 $0 $0 CalPers CERBT $0 $0 $0 Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes $0 $0 $0 Other Revenues $14,506 $13,169 $13,000 Total Farebox Revenues $409,812 $447,602 $469,821 Total Operating Expense $2,042,898 $2,191,641 $2,349,102 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.06% 20.42% 20.00% FY 2015/16-FY 2016/17 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN City of Riverside Special Transportation Services TABLE OF CONTENTS I. System Overview 1 1.1 Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile 2 1.3 Paratransit Services 2 1.4 Current Fare Structure 3 1.5 Revenue Fleet 3 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities 3 II. Existing Service and Route Performance 5 2.1 Dial -A -Ride Services -System Performance 5 2.2 Key Performances Indicators 5 2.3 Productivity Improvement Efforts 6 2.4 Major Trip Generators 6 III. Planned Service Changes and Implementation 8 3.1 Recent Service Changes 8 3.2 Recommended Modifications to Paratransit Services 8 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion 9 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes 9 IV. Financial and Capital Plans 10 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 10 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program 11 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 11 V. Tables 12 Table 1— Fleet Inventory 12 Table 2 - City of Riverside SRTP Service Summary 13 Table 3 — SRTP Route Statistics 14 Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 16 Table 4A — Capital Projects Justification 17 Table 5.1— Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 21 Table 5.1A — Capital Justification of 5.1 22 Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 24 Table 5.2A — Capital Justification of 5.2 25 Table 6 — Progress to Implement TDA Triennial Performance Audit 26 Table 7- Service Provider Performance Target Report 28 Table 8 — FY 2015/16 SRTP Performance Report 29 Table 9 — Highlights of 2015/16 — 2016/17 Short Range Transit Plan 30 Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data for Previous Four Years 31 Table 98 — Fare Revenue Calculation 31 I. SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Service Area Special Transportation (ST) is a division within the Community Services branch of the City of Riverside Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department that has been offering transportation services to seniors and disabled residents in the Riverside community since 1975. This dial -a -ride transportation service is provided within the 81.54 square mile incorporated city limits of the City of Riverside, shown below in Figure 1. Figure 1 ool I 4 I Po'co ) La Sierra HUM O Riverside County !an Semenlino County m - : ��� ;sah.�y' jj NONnIOe Hunter Industrial Park :e.._. Li . Omentswn j L= E f• iaC� n• � �T� i� UnMrsUy I Oland AhpM et. T�� a t j " �` ndirb co HHAIM. La UlerroSouth A ':>t�i�r't J t _ Riverside county `te Alessandro Heights �.._.._.._.._..,M.. 7'ti Minion Wow SWAMI/ County (March Joint .�.._...«._.. _.�.� Powers Archon„ !i 1 1.2 Population Profile The American Community Survey (ACS) data is a source of demographic information which is part of the 2010 Decennial Census Program. The ACS is a nationwide survey designed to provide communities with reliable and timely demographic, social, economic and housing data every year. Because the ACS is conducted annually, it serves as an interim source of up-to-date demographic data through the decade, until the next Census is conducted. According to the 2009-2013 ACS Survey 5-year estimates, the population of the City of Riverside is 309,150 residents. The senior population within the City of Riverside (those 60 years of age and over) accounts for approximately 13% of the population. Riverside is below the national average of seniors age 60 and over which is 19%, however, due to the Baby Boomer generation aging into their sixties, the senior population will continue to rise rapidly. Ridership has been trending upward for the past several years and continues to increase. 1.3 Paratransit Services Owned and operated by the City of Riverside, Special Transportation is an origin -to - destination rideshare transportation service. The service is limited to senior citizens (60 years of age and older) and persons with disabilities (disabilities require a physician documentation). Special Transportation operates 362 days per year, only suspending service on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Operating hours for ST are Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. and on weekends and holidays from 9:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. In order to reserve a ride, passengers must call Special ST's reservation telephone number, during the business hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. An answering machine is available before and after business hours for cancellations. A new service will be added this year that will be very convenient to ST riders and reduce the workload on ST driver/schedulers. ST will be implementing a new module in the 2 scheduling software that will automatically call riders to remind them of their scheduled trip and also when the driver arrives at their pick-up location. There will be several touch-tone options for the patrons to accept ride or cancel the ride. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure The ST fare structure for a one-way trip is $2.00 per passenger. Clients may pay their fare in cash at boarding time or with pre -purchased tickets and punchcards. Tickets can be purchased for $2.00 for a one-way ride; a punch card may be purchased for $40.00 and is equivalent to 20 rides. Special Transit will be moving forward with a fare increase proposal that, if approved, will go into effect in FY 2015/16. Currently, staff is researching the amount the fare will increase and the implementation schedule of the new fare structure. 1.5 Revenue Fleet ST has been operating with a fleet of 35 paratransit compressed natural gas (CNG), alternative fuel, Type III vehicles. Special Transportation increased its fleet by five vehicles in fiscal year 2012/13. ST replaced nine vehicles that reached their life capacity in fiscal year 2013/14. ST also owns one paratransit van equipped to hold six passengers and one wheelchair. A Honda Civic is used by staff in supervising routes and responding to accidents. These vehicles are not assigned to routes but are used as backups for special services. ST is looking to purchase two additional replacement vehicles, one equipped to hold six passengers and one wheelchair and another passenger vehicle. These will replace the existing van and passenger car. 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities ST facilities are located at 8095 Lincoln Avenue within the City of Riverside Corporation Yard. Included in the facilities are an administration building consisting of administrative offices, a dispatch area, training/conference room, restrooms and a breakroom. Special Transportation's facilities also include a parking lot for the transit buses with each space 3 equipped with a CNG slow fill station, and a CNG Maintenance Bay for maintenance and repair of the fleet. The facility includes five maintenance bays, an administrative office, and multiple storage compartments for vehicle parts and equipment. The facility is outfitted with state of the art safety equipment and machinery to maintain the CNG fueled vehicles. In FY 2014/15, ST expanded its Slow Fill Stations from twenty to thirty-six CNG fueling stations allowing for all of the buses to be fueled overnight. The project was funded by federal and local funds. The project was significantly under budget, so staff is implementing a Phase Two Slow Fill project which entails replacing the main line to the slow fill stations. Staff has received Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) approval to use the funds for this project. Special Transportation has been awarded Proposition 1B Security, Federal Transportation Administration and Prop 1B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvements, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) funds to expand and modernize its administration building. However, Federal funds will not be used for this project and staff is working with the FTA to move funds to another line item in the grant application. The project went out to bid in fall 2014 and closed on January 21, 2015. The lowest responsible bidder was Dalke and Sons, who will begin construction late May; construction is slated to last approximately four months. The renovation includes a re -design of the interior floor plan, resulting in more efficient and modern work spaces for dispatchers, four private offices, a state-of-the-art break room, upgraded restrooms, a conference room and a locker area for staff. Other improvements include, HVAC upgrades and re-routes, exterior paint and roofing. During the construction phase of the project, staff will be relocated. The Operations Supervisor and dispatchers will move into a temporary trailer located across from the existing facility. This will allow staff to visually monitor the buses and still be accessible to drivers. Administrative staff will be located inside the corporation yard offices with the General Services staff. There are several vacant work spaces which will be convenient for staff to occupy and bring their supplies. 4 IL EXISTING SERVICES AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Dial -A -Ride Service -System Performance ST served 183,000 passengers during the 2014/15 fiscal year. Ridership is projected to increase to approximately 190,000 in FY2015/16, representing a 2% increase from the previous fiscal year and 10% from the 2011/12 fiscal year. ST averages between 600-700 riders per day and has seen an increase in ridership during the last two fiscal years. The increase is due to the ever increasing senior population, word of mouth and ongoing advertisement in places such as Riverside's senior centers and through the City of Riverside's Activity Guide publication. 2.2 Key Performance Indicators During fiscal year 2014/15, Special Transportation met its mandatory farebox recovery ratio target and met all seven discretionary performance indicators, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 Performance Indicators Performance Scorecard Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile Meets Target 5 2.3 Productivity Improvement Efforts ST strives to operate an efficient service and continues to seek ways to decrease costs while maintaining high productivity. Specifically, staff has been focusing on implementing the most efficient routes possible in order to effectively utilize staff and maintain on -time pick-ups. Staff invited RouteMatch to provide training on optimization so that routes are designed effectively and free up some dispatcher time that is much needed for other tasks. Also, a dispatcher will be assigned to analyze routes every day in order to fill next and same day requests and to ensure driver overtime costs are kept to a minimum. In the beginning of the 2014/15 fiscal year, ST added two full time drivers and by mid -year, converted 13 three-quarter time benefited drivers to full-time. Although the increase in weekly hours wasn't large, it was needed to have more coverage on the routes due to increased ridership. The three-quarter time positions will be eliminated and operations will use half time benefited and non -benefited drivers to assist in coverage during peak times and weekends. Using part time drivers shorten travel times between pickups and drop offs during busy times, yet doesn't cause an overage of drivers during non -peak times. A successful pilot program to replace all Ranger mobile radios with Samsung tablets led to the replacement of all Rangers with the tablets. The program began with seven tablets and now the entire fleet had a tablet to work from. The cost savings was substantial, the Rangers cost were roughly $2,500 whereas a tablet cost is $300. No issues have been experienced so far, a tablet could be replaced approximately 8 times before reaching the cost of one Ranger. Also, staff worked with the city's IT Department to ensure that no other applications or internet access could take place on the tablet and that only RouteMatch could be used. 2.4 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next Two Years There are several factors that will lead to growth of ST operations over the next two years. As mentioned previously, the Baby Boomer generation, the largest generation in the last century, is aging into the realm of senior citizens. This element alone makes growth virtually unavoidable. The senior population within the city is approximately 13% and residents nearing 6 the age of 60 totals 18% of the population, as shown in Figure 3, leading staff to anticipate a higher demand for Special Transportation services in the very near future. Another factor that will increase ridership is the fact that this division now falls under the auspices of the Community Services branch of the City of Riverside Parks, Recreation, and Community Service Department. This branch is also responsible for senior programs and two senior centers, as well as the Friendly Stars program for developmentally disabled adults. This relationship and the connection among staff in these three areas make it possible to connect resources and advertise by word of mouth to their program participants. Influencing ridership and growth will be the re -design of the buses' exterior. The new look will bring more attention to the program and breathe life into the buses. Along with the new bus design will be new driver uniforms and new marketing materials. Major trip generators for the ST operations include the many workshops ST transport clients to and from and the Friendly Stars program on most Friday evenings. During the week, a few primary locations ST frequents daily are workshops for mentally and physically disabled passengers, that teach them to live independently. These passengers look forward to attending their workshops (work/school) to attain a sense of independence. Special Transportation transports over 160 passengers per day to workshops, along with weekly transportation to Friendly Stars, which include holiday and unique programming. 7 City of Riverside Age Demographics 75-79 80-84 85 and Over 5% 4% -\ 4% 70-74� 6% Ill. PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes ST implemented a service change in March 2015. Additional buses were needed for morning roll out in order to accommodate some changes to the workshop locations. For years, the clients have been transported to one location; the service provider then transported the clients to their work location. In March, the service provider asked that the clients be transported directly to their work locations. This accommodation was challenging due to staffing levels and trying to maintain appropriate staffing for the afternoon run. Working with RTA for guidance and assistance when needed, made this transition possible. 3.2 Recommended Modification to Paratransit Services Additional runs were scheduled from 7:00 a.m. — 9:30 a.m., and 1:30 p.m. — 4:30 p.m. to accommodate peak service hours in FY 12/13. Additional part time staffing was also added to cover the runs. Ridership demand plateaued during FY 13/14, but has since begun to rise starting in FY 14/15. We anticipate steady ridership increases and will be proactive by adding more staff. 8 No modification to the present routes is needed. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion In FY 2015/16, there will be a concerted effort to create a marketing plan for Special Transportation. The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department has a marketing team who will lend guidance and assistance in creating new brand, logo, brochures, and posters. As mentioned, the buses will have a drastic new look and it's a perfect time to re -brand the section. ST has continued with its advertisements on the back of the minibuses including the cost of the fare and telephone number for reservations. ST developed a poster (designed by a driver) and distributed to senior centers and other agencies. ST regularly prints out flyers and brochures to distribute to the city's community centers and senior centers and also includes ads in other city publications such as the Activity Guide and Senior Guide. The Activity Guide is published three times per year, is mailed to over 55,000 residents and is available online at the city's website. Special Transportation also advertised in the 2014 Mariachi Festival Program, an event whose attendees consist of a large proportion of seniors. Staff makes an effort to be present at special events (wellness fairs, grand openings, concerts, etc.) to conduct outreach to the public and distribute promotional products. A new form of advertising in FY 14/15 year is the placement of ads on the prescription bags at Ralph's pharmacy. 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes The largest budget impact is the conversion of the three-quarter time drivers to full-time status. This is mostly due to the increase in the cost of benefits, and the costs for preventative maintenance. In the years since ST increased the fleet, the maintenance costs have increased significantly; however, with increased ridership, typical salary savings and a more efficient operating budget, ST expects to maintain its farebox recovery ratio. Also, additional maintenance funds are being requested from the FTA to assist ST in sustaining the costs of maintaining the fleet. ST is required to maintain a 10% farebox recovery ratio. For the 2014/15 fiscal year, ST expects to maintain a 10.95% farebox recovery ratio and is currently exceeding that goal. In the fiscal year of 2013/14 Special Transportation reported a farebox recovery ratio of 11.14%. 9 IV. FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget Special Transportation relies on Local Transportation Funds (LTF) to support its operating budget including 20% of the preventative maintenance funds needed for the fleet. The remaining 80% comes from federal section 5307 funds. ST's overall budget for the 2015/16 fiscal year has increased by less than 2% in comparison to the 2014/15 fiscal year as shown in Figure A. ST is requesting an additional $67,543 in LTF funds for FY 2015/16 to cover increasing operating expenses. Figure A Budget Item FY 2014/15 SRTP FY 2015/16 Plan Variance Amount in Dollars Variance Percentage Salaries & Benefits $2,125,458 $2,259,215 $133,757 6.2% Materials & Supplies $230,227 $39,900 -$190,327 -83% Fuel $225,000 $225,000 $0 0 Maintenance $400,000 $500,000 $100,000 25% Contract Services $0 $94,256 $94,256 - Non -Personnel Costs $387,814 $381,229 -$6,585 -1.7% Total $3,384,276 $3,499,600 $115,324 3.4% Special Transportation is continuing to partially fund a contracted security guard for the 2015/16 fiscal year in order to continue the security of the parking lot and CNG Vehicle Maintenance facilities. Personnel costs, in the form of driver staff hours and related benefits, have risen due to the conversion of the three-quarter time drivers and the increase into PERS and medical benefits. ST is requesting $44,200 in STA capital allocation for the upcoming fiscal year 2015/16 to serve as match funds for the federal section 5339 funds. 10 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program ST will continue to take advantage of available grant opportunities such as the California Department of Transportation Proposition 16 Public Transportation Modernization, Improvements, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA), in order to support its capital programs. ST purchased nine vehicles last fiscal year and plans to order six more vehicles utilizing the PTMISEA funding from the FY14/15 allocation. Special Transportation will also receive Proposition 1E1 Security Funds to cover the section's safety and security needs. FTA 5307 funds will be used for the preventative maintenance of the fleet and FTA section 5339 funds will fund the purchase of two replacement vehicles. Previously allocated STA funds will be used towards the purchase of an additional replacement bus. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Special Transportation strives to remain compliant with all local, state and federal regulations. Staff stays abreast of legislative information and developments by attending workshops, trainings, and conferences which are frequently offered free of charge to transit operators. ST complies with FTA reporting requirements such as the submission of monthly and annual National Transit Database (NTD) reports. ST recently underwent an FTA Triennial Review April 8 — 9, 2015. In 2012, Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) completed its FY 2010-2012 Triennial Performance Audit for ST which had several recommendations: complete and implement the no-show policy, reprogram unused grant funds awarded to ST and meet goal of 100% preventive maintenance schedule adherence. ST has completed the no-show policy and is working on some modifications due to information learned at an FTA training staff attended. ST has reprogrammed federal and state grants, along with beginning several project implementations. Lastly, ST has reached a goal of 100% PMI. The dedicated maintenance facility has assisted with increasing the efficiency of PMI completions. The city expects to undergo the next TDA Triennial Performance audit in 2016. 11 ' 4 6wsdcCoati L'mspsltlim (mmemr Demand Response / Directly Operated Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FT 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan City of Riverside Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2008 2005 2008 2010 2008 2013 2014 CMD EDN EDN FRD GLV GLV GLV BU BU BU BU BU BU BU 7 12 14 16 16 16 16 2 2 2 10 16 7 18 15 25 25 25 25 25 25 GA CN CN CN CN CN CN 1 1 1 10 8 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,430 153,187 122,571 1,137,555 1,167,592 111,589 0 32,730 163,448 122,747 1,362,339 1,421,045 277,255 66,313 32,730 163,448 122,747 136,234 177,631 39,608 7,368 Totals: 97 57 37 0 2,722,924 3,445,877 93,132 TransTracir Manager'"' 5/20/2015 Page 1 of 1 r EMI Smith 4muy Licapxlaim (one[ Table 2 -- City of Riverside -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/ 13 Audited FY 2013/ 14 Audited FY 2014/ 15 Plan FY 2014/ 15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/ 16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 29 29 Finandal Data Total Operating Expenses $3,169,702 $3,436,714 $3,323,825 $2,278,738 $3,499,680 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $374,768 $382,963 $364,123 $304,696 $383,000 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $2,794,934 $3,053,751 $2,959,702 $1,974,042 $3,116,680 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 172,725 182,878 186,000 131,421 190,000 Passenger Miles 1,001,805 1,060,692 701,700 762,242 1,060,692 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Hours (a) 49,892.0 49,831.5 52,187.0 35,410.2 53,230.0 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Miles (b) 702,097.0 689,882.0 894,812.0 494,617.0 703,682.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 787,411.0 780,270.0 912,708.0 561,977.0 789,105.0 Performance Characteristics . Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $63.53 $68.97 $63.69 $64.35 $65.75 Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.82% 11.14% 10.95% 13.37% 10.94% Subsidy per Passenger $16.18 $16.70 $15.91 $15.02 $16.40 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.79 $2.88 $4.22 $2.59 $2.94 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $56.02 $61.28 $56.71 $55.75 $58.55 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.98 $4.43 $3.31 $3.99 $4.43 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.25 0.27 0.21 0.27 0.27 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. w TransTractk Manager"" 5/18/2015 Page 1 of 1 Zio I Odd STOZ/BT/S ,„.reNeusw ypeafsuel 089'91T'£$ 000'£8£$ 089'66b'E$ O'50V68L O789'£OL 0'081'59 O'OEZ'ES Z69'090'T 000'06T 6Z WW1 raPleldeolklaS 089'911'ES 000'£8£$ 089'66b'E$ O'50T'69L 0789'EOL 0'081'59 O'OWES Z69'0901 000'06T 6Z Pau6lneufl ava-SSZI APIsenS enema leo3 RIM segW smoH emoH sallW 3eN lebuessed 6unaled0 enema Ielel enumea Jeauessed used AsPIIPA W1 Ae0 # %Ilea eWd swami] eleO saanoa IIV 9T/STOZ Ad b -- J0 AID SZAPIS EN aanvd d12/5 - £ a/9e1 'ccossnopmaialsca4+m')"sant Z 0 torte* STOUBT/5 m a6eueM viiLsersl LZ'0 9'E Eb'bS STOSS 1,67$ O6'93 %b6'0T Zb'8TS L6'0 SC'S9S WW1 aPlaoid eolmaS CZ'0 9'E Eb'bS S58SS b67S Ob'9TS 9646'01 Zb'8TS L634 SC'S9S PauNsseufl ava-SSa MIN ad .noH and Mai moH DIM mOuassed MEd Joboassed allW anuamaa JnoH anuamm adAL Ag0 * Knoll sm6uaased smfmassed snowed anus mfluassed ad APPOnS A m000m +ad 1s03 +ad sad zsoa ad 1Pls9nS and 1PMPnS and Ares4nS mowed &mead° 6upeiado sio4ealPuI aou¢wJo}iad salrioa IIV 9T/STOZ Ad ti -- aPislaARI Jo AID SVS.ReiS WWI &NS - £ a/9e1 ."*.N)RW :ftel=amoP?um 313d City of Riverside FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF FY 15/16 STA FY 07/08 STA Carryover Prop 1 B (PTMISFA) Prop 1 B Security Section 5339 Section 5307 - Riv- San. Bndo Fare Box Other m Local Transportation Funds $2,999,600 $2,616,600 $383,000 Operating Assistance Capitalized Preventive $500,000 $100,000 $400,000 Maintenance Subtotal: Operating $3,499,600 $2,716,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $383,000 $0 Security/Safety Equipment (Prop 1 B FY 14/15) FY 16-01 $48,452 $48,452 3 Bus (Sec 5339 FY 13 & FY 14) FY 16-02 $340,197 $44,200 $101,360 $194,637 6 Vehicle Puchase (PTMISEA 1B FY 14/15) FY 16-03 $640,323 $640,323 Subtotal: Capital $1,028,972 $0 $44,200 $101,360 $640,323 $48,452 $194,637 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating 8 Capital $4,528,572 $2,716,600 $44,200 $101,360 $640,323 $48,452 $194,637 $400,000 $383,000 $0 Revised 5/18/2015 Summary of FY 2015/16 Funds Requested.xls Table 4A-Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 16-01 PROJECT NAME: Security and Safety Improvements (2010-14) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To enhance security of the ST parking lot, Operations Facility, and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Maintenance Facility and providing a mobile Emergency Operations Center. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: ST has installed additional lighting to enhance the parking lot during pre -trip and post -trip inspections for the minibus drivers. ST has also installed cameras outside and near the administration building and parking lot, including the vehicle maintenance facility which improves the security surrounding the buildings. During renovation of the Administration Building, additional safety and security enhancements will be added. ST would like to purchase additional emergency response and security equipment to create a mobile Emergency Operations Center. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (RECEIVED) Description Funds Prop 1B Security (FY 14-15) $48,452 Total $48,452 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE -OR PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED - INCLUDE FTA GRANT NUMBER AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT NUMBER FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended Balance Prop 1B Security (2010-11) $33,202 Prop 1B Security (2011-12) $33,092 17 Prop 16 Security (2012-13) $48,474 Prop 113 Security (2013-14) $48,451 18 PROJECT NUMBER: FY 16-02 PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Replacement (3 Vehicles) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To replace vehicles that has accrued 150,000 miles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation replaces vehicles that have reached 150,000 miles, in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Sec 5339 $194,637 STA Match FY 15/16 $44,200 Total $238,837 STA Carryover FY 07/08 $101,360 Total $101,360 Grand Total $340,197 19 PROJECT NUMBER: FY 16-03 PROJECT NAME: PTMISEA FY 14/15 Vehicle Replacement (6 Vehicles) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To replace vehicles that has accrued 150,000 miles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation replaces vehicles that have reached 150,000 miles, in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): PTMISEA $640,323 STA Match 0 Total $640,323 20 City of Riverside FY 2016/17 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 Project Description Caprtai Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA STA Carryover Prop 1 B (PTMISEA) Prop 1B Security Section 5339 Section 5307 - Riv- San. Bndo Fare Box Other m Local Transportation Funds Operating Assistance Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $3,166,600 $500,000 $2,691,600 $100,000 $400,000 $475,000 Subtotal: Operating 53,666,600 $2,791,800 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $400,000: $475,000 $0 Security/Safety Equipment (Prop 1 B FY 15/16) Vehicle Purchase (1 van 8 1 auto) Sec 5307 FY 17-01 FY 17-02 $48,452 $100,000 $20,000 $48,452 $80,000 Subtotal: Capital $148,452 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $418,452 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $3,815,052 $2,791,600 $20,000 $0 $0 $48,452 $0 $480,00a $475,000 $0 Revised 5/18/2015 N Summary of FY 2016/17 ~ Funds Requested.xls Table 5.1A-Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 17-01 PROJECT NAME: Security and Safety Improvements Prop 1B FY 15/16 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To enhance security of the ST parking lot, Operations Facility, and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Maintenance Facility and providing a mobile Emergency Operations Center. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: ST has installed additional lighting to enhance the parking lot during pre -trip and post -trip inspections for the minibus drivers. ST has also installed cameras outside and near the administration building and parking lot, including the vehicle maintenance facility which improves the security surrounding the buildings. During renovation of the Administration Building, additional safety and security enhancements will be added. ST would like to purchase additional emergency response and security equipment to create a mobile Emergency Operations Center. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (RECEIVED) Description Funds Prop 1B Security FY 15/16 $48,452 Total $48,452 22 PROJECT NUMBER: FY17-02 PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Replacement (1 van and 1 auto) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Supervisor vehicle and ADA reserve van will have reached their useful life expectancy and will need to be replaced. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation replaces vehicles that have reached their useful life expectancy, in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines. The existing paratransit passenger van (used for backup) and the supervisor vehicle used to report to accident and incidents are in need of replacement. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Funding Source Amount Sec 5307 $80,000 STA Match $20,000 Total $100,000 23 City of Riverside FY 2017/18 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA STA Carryover Prop 1 B (PTMISEA) Prop 1B Security Section 5339 Section 5307 - Riv- San. Bndo Fare Box Other m Local Transportation Funds Operating Assistance Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $3,291,600 $500,000 $2,766,600 $100,000 $400,000 $525,000 Subtotal: Operating $3,791,600 $2,868,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $525,000 $0 4 Bus Purchase (sec 5307) FY 18-01 $460,000 $92,000 $368,000 Subtotal: Capital $460,000 $0 $92,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $368,000 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital I $4,251,600 $2,866,600 $92,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $768,000 $525,000 $0 Revised 5/18/2015 � Summary of FY 2017/18 Funds Requested.xls Table 5.2A-Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 18-01 PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Replacement (4 buses) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To replace vehicles that have accrued 150,000 miles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation replaces minibuses that have reached 150,000 miles, in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines. It is projected that four mini buses will be in need of replacement in FY 17/18. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Funding Source Amount Sec 5307 $368,000 STA Match $92,000 Total $460,000 25 TABLE 6- PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TDA TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2010-2012) Action (s) Taken and Results to Date 1. Need to complete and implement the Special Transportation has completed the no - no -show policy. show policy and is modifying based on The City is continuing to update and finalize its feedback received at an FTA training staff No -Show policy, According to ST, No -Shows attended. comprise 5 percent of total ridership as the number of trips has continued to increase. The rate is above general industry norms. In Progress 2. Reprogram Unused Grant Funds Special Transportation has reprogrammed Awarded to Special Transportation Services. federal and state grants, along with beginning The City of Riverside has been successful in several project implementations and the securing a variety of grants to support its purchase of buses. Staff is working with FTA to Special Transportation Services from state and complete line item budget revisions in order federal sources. FTA grants generally expire 3 to utilize all remaining funds and close out years after they are awarded. As of February outstanding grants. As of March 2015, two 2013, the total grant funding amounted to open grants remain. $8,693,209 with $2,874,200 expended to date and $4,497,510 remaining plus $809,375 in In Progress State Proposition 1B funding not yet awarded. 26 3. Meet Goal of 100% Preventive Maintenance Schedule Adherence. With completion of a new maintenance shop dedicated to Riverside Special Transportation, there should be improved adherence to preventive maintenance inspections (PMI). Meeting timely PMIs are critical to the reliability and useful life of the vehicles. RT should ensure that the PMI schedules for the growing fleet are developed to ensure timely vehicle inspection of all vehicles and full bus pull outs. Special Transportation has reached a goal of 100% PMI. The dedicated maintenance facility has assisted with increased the efficiency of PMI completions. Completed 27 &Irak [msy ticcapafdia' immeam Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Riverside Data Elements FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year to Date Through 4th Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 186,000 _ Passenger Miles 701,700 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Hours 52,187.0 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Miles 894,812.0 Total Actual Vehide Miles 912,708.0 Total Operating Expenses $3,323,825 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $364,123 Net Operating Expenses $2,959,702 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 10.950/01 >= 10.00%' 13.37% 1 Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $63.69 <= $69.76 $64.35 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $15.91 >= $13.94 and <= $18.86 $15.02 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $4.22 >= $2.41 and <= $3.25 $2.59 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $56.71 >= $51.29 and <= $69.39 $55.75 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $3.31 >= $3.73 and <= $5.05 $3.99 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 3.60 >= 3.15 and <= 4.26 3.70 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.21 >= 0.23 and <= 0.31 0.27 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: N W TransTradr Manager"" 5/18/2015 Page 1 of I ��Mims rind& (curry u�paidim (anwisiot FY 2015/16 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; City of Riverside All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2013/14 End of Year Actual FY 2014/15 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2015/16 Plan FY 2015/16 Target Plan Performance (a) Passengers 182,878 131,421 190,000 None Passenger Miles 1,060,692 762,242 1,060,692 None Revenue Hours 49,831.5 35,410.2 53,230.0 None Total Hours 66,617.0 48,940.0 65,180.0 None Revenue Miles 689,882.0 494,617.0 703,682.0 None Total Miles 780,270.0 561,977.0 789,105.0 None Operating Costs $3,436,714 $2,278,738 $3,499,600 None Passenger Revenue $382,963 $304,696 $383,000 None Operating Subsidy $3,053,751 $1,974,042 $3,116,600 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $68.97 $64.35 $65.74 <_ $64.97 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $4.98 $4.61 $4.97 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $18.79 $17.34 $18.42 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.14% 13.37% 10.94% >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $16.70 $15.02 $16.40 >_ $12.77 and <_ $17.27 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $2.88 $2.59 $2.94 >_ $2.20 and <_ $2.98 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $61.28 $55.75 $58.55 >_ $47.39 and <_ $64.11 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $4.43 $3.99 $4.43 >_ $3.39 and <_ $4.59 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 3.70 3.70 3.60 >= 3.15 and <= 4.26 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.27 0.27 0.27 >= 0.23 and <= 0.31 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2015/16 Plan to the FY 2015/16 Primary Target. N TransTraclF Manager"" 5/18/2015 Page 1 of Table 9 - HIGHLIGHTS OF 2015/16-2016/17 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Proposition 1B Security Grants: To enhance safety and security, ST applied for almost $48,452 to install additional lighting and cameras in its parking lot and newly constructed CNG Vehicle Maintenance Facility. Staff is also planning to purchase emergency response equipment and expand existing security funds. Capital Projects: • Vehicle Procurement and Delivery — ST will be replacing nine, 16 passenger, paratransit vehicles with grant funds received through the Federal Transit Administration, STA and Proposition 18 capital grant. Vehicles will be delivered by the end of fiscal year 15/16. The number of buses depends on the final cost of each minibus. • Operations Facility Modernization and Expansion — This project to renovate the administration building will be completed early FY15/16 and entails modernizing the existing facility to accommodate a larger dispatch center, separate conference room, and a reception area for clients seeking to purchase bus passes and tickets. Enhancing this operational facility will increase efficiency within the transit operation and enhance passenger access to the facility. Performance Target Report — ST plans to continue to meet the mandatory farebox recovery ratio target and meet six of the seven discretionary performance indicators in the FY 2015/16 (shown in Table 9 below.) Transit operators are required to meet at least four of the seven discretionary performance indicators. Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Fails To Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indictors 30 Operating and Financial Data for the past four years and for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year are shown below. Table 9A Operating & Financial Data FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2013/14 FY 2014/15 (Projected) FY 2015/16 (Planned) System Wide Ridership 174,058 172,725 182,878 183,040 190,000 Operating Cost per Revenue Hours $64.76 $63.53 $68.97 $64.35 $65.74 Farebox revenue is the only course of revenue for Special Transportation. Figure 9B below reflects the farebox revue and the operating costs since FY 2011/12. Table 9B Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2013/14 FY 2014/15 (Projected) FY 2015/16 (Planned) 1. Passenger Fares $370,773 $374,768 $382,963 $368,089 $383,000 Total Revenue $370,773 $374,768 $382,963 $368,089 $383,000 Total Operating Expenses $3,036,822 $3,169,702 $3,436,714 $3,078,065 $3,499,680 Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.21% 11.82% 11.14% 11.95% 10.94% 31 Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass Rail Short Range Transit Plan FY 2014/15-2016/17 COACHELLA VALLEY- SAN GORGONIO PASS FINAL DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - BACKGROUND 4 1.1 CVAG MOU and TDA Funding 4 1.2 SRTP Amendments 5 1.3 Service Development Plan 6 CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT OVERVIEW 6 2.1 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 6 2.2 Fixed Route Services 7 2.3 Scope 8 2.4 Objective 8 2.5 Project Location 8 2.7 Project Schedule and Deliverables 10 CHAPTER 3 - DESCRIPTION OF WORK 10 3.1 Detailed Project Work Plan and Outreach Plan 11 CHAPTER 4 - PRELIMINARY SERVICE PLANNING AND ALTERNATIVES 12 4.1 Alternatives Analysis 12 4.2 Preliminary Service Development Planning Methodology 13 CHAPTER 5 - ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION 14 5.1 NEPA/CEQA Scoping and Outreach 14 5.2 Environmental Document & Section 4(f) Analysis 16 CHAPTER 6 - SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT 18 CHAPTER 7 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT 19 TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED 21 TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF FUTURE FUNDS REQUESTED 23 TABLE 9 - SRTP HIGHLIGHTS 26 2 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS BNSF BNSF Railway CEQ Council of Environmental Quality CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CETAP Community & Environmental Acceptability Process CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Funds CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement EA Environmental Assessment EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EOM Extra -Ordinary Maintenance FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HSIPR High -Speed Intercity Passenger Rail IEOC Inland Empire -Orange County Line LACMTA Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority LAUS Los Angeles Union Station LOSSAN Los Angeles/San Diego/San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency LTF Local Transportation Funds MOW Maintenance -of -Way NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NOA Notice of Availability NOI Notice of Intent NTD National Transit Database OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PA&ED Project Approval and Environmental Document PRCIP Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan PTC Positive Train Control PTMISEA Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account PVL Perris Valley Line RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission ROD Record of Decision RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program SANBAG San Bernardino Associated Governments SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SDP Service Development Plan SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance Funds STIP State Transportation Improvement Program STP Surface Transportation Program Funds TVM Ticket Vending Machine UPRR Union Pacific Railroad VCTC Ventura County Transportation Commission 3 CHAPTER 1 — BACKGROUND Providing passenger rail service to the Coachella Valley has been a long- standing priority for more than two decades. The first studies for such a service were completed in the early 1990's. Additional studies have been performed over time with one of the more recent efforts completed in April 2010. This study was completed through coordination by CVAG, the Commission, and Schiermeyer Consulting Services and adopted by the CVAG Executive Committee on October 25, 2010. On November Commission reaffirmed its formal support for implementation and expansion of intercity Amtrak rail service to the Coachella Valley and directed staff to coordinate with CVAG and local communities to advocate for the service. To follow up on that effort the Commission adopted a formal Resolution No. 11-001 in support of Amtrak's plan to run the Sunset Limited daily through the Coachella Valley. 10, 2010 the In May 2013 the state of California Division of Rail (Caltrans) completed the first phase of a planning study and initial alternatives analysis for the rail corridor. This planning study was very supportive of the potential for a viable service. Future studies will expand on such analyses by determining ridership demand and better cost estimates. Caltrans also included an updated project description and analysis of the Coachella Valley service in the latest state rail plan, approved on September 5, 2013 by the State Transportation Agency. The next update will take place in 2017. 1.1 CVAG MOU and TDA Funding At its September 30, 2013 meeting, the CVAG Executive Committee approved a MOU between the Commission and CVAG to establish a funding split of Coachella Valley TDA funds. All of these TDA funds are currently allocated to SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the intent is to allocate 10 percent of the STA discretionary portion of the TDA funds, using a phased -in approach, in order to support a Coachella Valley Rail program. The intent of the MOU is to allow the Commission to set aside those STA funds into a Coachella Valley Rail fund to be used only for capital costs to improve stations, staff support, as well as funding for technical studies. This funding split is to be phased in as follows: FY 2014/15 5 percent of the STA portion of the TDA funds FY 2015/16 7 percent of the STA portion of the TDA funds FY 2016/17 and thereafter 10 percent of the STA portion of the TDA funds 4 TDA funds are utilized on a wide variety of transportation programs throughout the state including Riverside County. These activities include planning and programming activities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, community transit services, public transportation, and transit projects. Historically TDA funds have not been set aside for passenger rail. However, technical work will continue on development of the Los Angeles to Coachella Valley corridor in the state rail plan. This work will demonstrate the Coachella Valley's commitment toward implementing a robust rail program and thereby serve as a lever to unlock federal and state sources of funding and other support for necessary environmental work, as well as future operations funding. SunLine is the only designated public transit operator in the Coachella Valley currently authorized by the state to receive these funds. The establishment of the Coachella Valley bus/rail split will have an impact on bus transit operations. The phased -in approach is intended to provide SunLine with lead time in order to mitigate budgetary impacts. While not an immediate need, prudent planning requires fleet replacement be considered years in advance to accumulate cash reserves to finance the purchase of heavy duty buses, light duty ADA vehicles, and necessary support vehicles. SunLine's fleet plan will need $3.5 million per year in order to finance fleet replacement vehicles and those necessary for service expansion through 2030. SunLine has been involved in the development of this plan and is working in partnership with the Commission and CVAG in order to promote close coordination of bus and rail needs so that both programs operate successfully. The MOU with CVAG will support a Coachella Valley Rail fund. These funds would be internally maintained at the Commission in a separate account while expenditures would be authorized by CVAG's Executive Committee. This would be similar to current arrangements for the Coachella Valley Highway and Regional Arterial program where the Commission acts as a fiscal agent pursuant to Measure A, but actual expenditures are authorized by CVAG. CVAG Executive Committee decisions regarding the Coachella Valley Rail fund would only impact passenger rail projects within the Coachella Valley. The Coachella Valley Rail fund would initially be used to improve stations with projects that have independent utility, provide funding for technical studies, and limited project management staff support. 1.2 SRTP Amendments The Commission's SRTP includes goals for the Commission's Regional Commuter Rail program and provides detailed information about existing services and facilities, financial forecasts and plans, as well as planned and proposed improvements to be implemented. The Commission oversees transit service in Riverside County primarily through the approval of SRTPs that detail the operating and capital costs planned for transit services. Each operator adopts such a plan and then provides data to the Commission on performance. As SRTPs are based upon estimates of future projects, it is necessary to subsequently amend these documents upon completion or changes to specified projects and circumstances. The Commuter Rail program thus amended its 5 FY 2013/14 Commuter Rail SRTP to use state grant funds and preserve local funds. These funds will be transferred into the Coachella Valley Rail fund for qualified expenditures. 1.3 Service Development Plan The true success of this effort will be to develop comprehensive and convincing planning documents that will allow Coachella Valley rail to compete for limited state and federal rail funds. The project purpose and need will have to be compelling and the ridership potential thoroughly demonstrated. The FRA staff already made it very clear that several rail alignments and alternatives must be studied and compared in order for the project to be viable. The July 1, 2010 Federal Register notice on High -Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) program outlines the planning process needed to obtain funding. This process identifies the need for a service development plan (SDP) with the following requirements: Clearly demonstrate the purpose and need; Analyze alternatives for the proposed passenger rail service; Identify the alternative that best meets the purpose and need; Identify the discrete capital projects required; and Demonstrate the operational and financial feasibility. Both Caltrans and FRA have been working to either develop or approve such SDP's for corridors throughout the country and offered some very helpful suggestions on how to conduct the planning effort. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement may be completed either after or in parallel to the SDP process. The intent is for Commission staff to initiate a Request for Proposal to hire a highly qualified consulting firm capable of conducting both the SDP and the NEPA documentation to expedite project development. CHAPTER 2 — PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed Coachella Valley —San Gorgonio Rail Corridor (Corridor) runs from Los Angeles to Indio through four Southern California counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino. The Corridor refers to the approximately 200-mile long rail corridor between Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) and the city of Indio. The Corridor consists of two segments: the western 59-mile long segment between LAUS and Riverside/Colton, and the eastern approximately 140-mile segment between Riverside/Colton and Indio. 2.1 Population Profile and Demographic Projections The proposed intercity passenger rail service would provide a conveniently scheduled link to the greater metropolitan areas of Southern California for the communities in the 6 fast-growing Coachella Valley and Banning Pass areas. It will also provide Los Angeles and Orange County residents' access to the world class Coachella Valley visitor destinations and festivals. In addition, it will provide lifeline access on routes not serviced by other means to key destinations such as the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Loma Linda. 2.2 Fixed Route Services On July 1, 2010, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) published its Interim Program Guidance for the High -Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program in the Federal Register Volume 75 No. 126 Notices. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) was selected through this competitive grant program for planning funds to conduct the State Rail Plan, which includes the proposed service that is the subject of this scope. As part of its planning processes, Caltrans conducted the Coachella Valley Intercity Rail Corridor Planning Study, which examined the viability of the provision of intercity passenger rail service between Los Angeles and Indio and recommended the preparation of a service development plan (SDP) to determine the range of, and ultimately, select a preferred service option for the corridor. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) will lead the planning efforts for the SDP and environmental documents, utilizing a combination of state and local funds. A large portion of the funding is from the State Proposition 1 B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program (PTMISEA). Due to the complexity of service development programs, extensive pre -construction preparation is required, including service planning, environmental review, and conceptual engineering efforts. The first phase of this process, known as the Planning Phase, is the development of the Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan (PRCIP). The PRCIP provides information in support of a future decision whether to fund and implement a major investment in a passenger rail corridor. It consists of two components: 1) an environmental document and analysis of the proposed rail service, which in the case of the Corridor will either be an environmental assessment (EA) or a Tier 1 environmental impact statement (EIS) to satisfy both the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, and 2) a SDP. Together, the environmental document and SDP complete the PRCIP, which would provide information to support a potential future FRA decision whether to fund and implement a major investment in the Corridor. For the purposes of this scope of work, the term "Project" means the completion of the SDP and environmental work activities exclusively for initial planning of the Corridor. Also for the purposes of this scope of work, the term "Corridor Program" means final design, environmental clearance, and construction work activities required to implement service along the corridor. 7 2.3 Scope This scope of work is divided into four major tasks and several subtasks, described in detail below. Task 1 includes early planning. Task 2 includes preliminary service planning and the preparation of other technical information to identify and develop an alternatives analysis. The data gathered during this phase will be used to perform Task 3, the development of the Environmental Documentation, and Task 4 the refinement and finalization of the SDP. Tasks may overlap and require close coordination and will be conducted through an iterative analytical process. Each task will be issued as separate task orders with specific budget and oversight requirements. 2.4 Objective The objective of the Project is to complete a PRCIP in compliance with FRA's Procedures, the Council of Environmental Quality's NEPA implementing regulation, and this SDP. For the purposes of this scope of work, the Project is the completion of the SDP work activities and the environmental documentation to support NEPA/CEQA clearance for program level design and operations necessary for the service. The environmental documentation will be an optional contract item that will proceed via a task order based on results of prior tasks. 2.5 Project Location The Banning Pass -Coachella Valley Rail Corridor consists of two segments: the western 59-mile long segment between LAUS and Riverside/Colton, and the eastern approximately 140-mile segment between Riverside/Colton and Indio. It is anticipated that alternate routes between Los Angeles and the Riverside/Colton area be analyzed. This would include possible routes along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) San Bernardino Subdivision, the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Alhambra or Los Angeles Subdivision and the Metrolink San Gabriel Subdivision. To ensure that planning considers the interrelationships of the broader regional rail network, the following segment(s) and/or services beyond the Banning Pass -Coachella Valley Rail Corridor shall be considered to the degree necessary to fully inform the service development planning process and service environmental work for the Corridor: 1. Amtrak Sunset Limited (Los Angeles to New Orleans via Phoenix); 2. Amtrak Southwest Chief (Los Angeles to Chicago via Riverside); 3. Amtrak Pacific Surfliner Trains (San Diego to San Luis Obispo); 4. Commuter Rail Operations Metrolink (Serving Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties); 5. Future daily intercity service between Los Angeles and Phoenix via Coachella Valley; 6. Local and regional bus connections; and 7. High Speed Rail future plans. 8 �� Jl r1liJ���� yJ (Los Angeles Union Station Pomona Ontario o�NT ta,xnreie: �� na 141i7fLA 91i1J SJIJ 1f7 take San nnowuead Tanning Montclair" Bernardino `n""Vs =ram- Loma Linda/ raw,. caahn Redlands Nrdlands Yucaipa (alimesa Cheery Valler ��e1111Jii59a11 ��P;i55 Beaumont r,nning Pass Ana Saharan Merl Not Springs /rand teraace Riverside PrarE"n, mtmda rm ���� powntown Noma iq\ � ul lfon xmro erwe,t,;eee: ._-.-._ Anaheim Nilh rr�:Srl��3 ru��,lrr Palm Springs P r Cathedral Cty Rancho Mirage Palm Pe srn Ind'en Indla WA}a to, a r"achelle. snermal LEGEND SCRRA San Gabriel Sub - Union Pacific RR Alhambra Sub -DSO Railway San Bernardino Sub r_ - Union Pacific RR Yuma Sub ��r - Union Pacific RR Los Angeles Sub CATCHMENT AREAS f& - Existing Station Areas O- Potential Station Areas �� r��rrj, r" rid Pelee !MILE: Indio Meua J " Not all potential Stations will be needed; Construction and alignment alternatives will be determined in the future. 2.6 Project Coordination The Contractor shall perform all tasks required for the Project through a coordinated process, which will involve affected railroad owners, operators, and funding partners, including: " Major Partners: Divisions within Caltrans, including Rail, Planning, Mass Transportation, and Transportation Systems Information; and Caltrans District 8 " Project Partner: FRA " Railroad Owners: UPRR, BNSF, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Orange County Transportation Authority, and San Bernardino Association of Governments " Regional Transportation Planning Agencies: Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) " Regulatory Agencies: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Bureau of Land Management (potentially), " Intercity Rail Agency: LOSSAN Joint Powers Authority " Intercity Rail Operator: Amtrak " Commuter Rail Operator: Metrolink 9 2.7 Project Schedule and Deliverables The period of performance for all work will be estimated by the Contractor and approved by the Commission with key milestones identified. The anticipated deliverables associated with this scope are as follows: Deliverables Task 1: Detailed Work Plan, Budget, and Outreach Plan ■ Detailed Project Work Plan (with budget) and Outreach Plan (Complete) Task 2: Preliminary Service Planning and Alternatives ■ Purpose and Need Statement (Complete) ■ Technical Memo on Criteria and Methodology (Complete) ■ Alternatives Analysis Report (In Progress) ■ Conceptual Engineering (In Progress) Task 3: Environmental Documentation ■ Draft NOI ■ Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan ■ Final Purpose and Need Statement ■ Scoping Report ■ Impact Analysis Methodology ■ Annotated Environmental Document Outline ■ Administrative Draft Environmental Document ■ Draft Environmental Document and Draft NOA ■ Administrative Final Environmental Document ■ Final Environmental Document and Draft NOA ■ Draft ROD Task 4: Service Development Plan ■ Technical Memo on SDP Outline and Methodology ■ Draft SDP ■ Final SDP CHAPTER 3 — DESCRIPTION OF WORK A detailed outreach plan with stakeholder coordination shall be prepared and submitted for approval. There is significant interest in this project from many diverse agencies, politicians, stakeholders, communities, and the like and accordingly, the proposed outreach plan shall be one that will accommodate the public interest as well as the feedback necessary to the overall planning process. This task includes both development 10 and implementation of the early alternatives planning outreach and should be designed to integrate with the outreach and public notification required by the eventual environmental process. 3.1 Detailed Project Work Plan and Outreach Plan For this initial task, the Contractor will prepare a detailed Project work plan. The work plan will describe the activities and steps necessary to complete this statement of work. The work plan shall also include information about the project management approach, including team organization, team decision -making, roles and responsibilities. In addition, the work plan will include the Project schedule and a detailed Project budget. The work plan will be reviewed and approved by the Commission. Task 1: Project Work Plan & Outreach Plan Define Project Approach Identify Stakeholder Outreach Task 2: Preliminary Service Planning and Alternatives Identify Service Develop Ridership and Cost Patterns/Alternatives Projections STOP) Decision Point: Is tTie Project Viable to Continue? Task 3: Environmental Documentation Environmental Outreach & Scoping Identify Impacts and Mitigations Task 4: Service Development Plan Finalize Planning Documents to be eligible for Federal Funds The Contractor shall provide an outreach team that can develop and manage a project website to share information with the ability to provide electronic surveys for project feedback. Other aspects of social media outreach should also be explored. In addition, the Contractor will facilitate efforts to initiate project support letters and resolutions from a broad range of stakeholders. The Contractor will facilitate regular technical advisory committee meetings at multiple locations along the corridor to provide updates and gain feedback on the project. The Contractor shall also maintain a database of interested parties and provide written fact sheets, newsletters and updates as needed. 11 Deliverables: • Detailed Project work plan, including Project budget and Project schedule, for Commission review and approval; and • Detailed stakeholder coordination and outreach plan shall be provided for Commission review and approval. CHAPTER 4 — PRELIMINARY SERVICE PLANNING AND ALTERNATIVES The fundamental starting point of any transportation planning effort is the identification of the purpose and need for an improvement to the transportation system service in the market. The first requirement for the identification of purpose and need shall be for the Contractor to bring resources to bear to identify pure/latent demand in the Coachella Valley for rail service. The Contractor shall provide the Commission with a general assessment on the Coachella Valley market and its ability to support potential rail service. Based on the initial indication of pure/latent demand, Contractor shall then proceed with the identification of alternatives for the Corridor Program. The Contractor will identify routing alternatives for the Corridor Program and also include no -build and bus only alternatives. From this list, the Contractor will conduct a feasibility analysis to identify the most reasonable and feasible alternatives for inclusion in an eventual environmental document and SDP. The results of corridor strategic plans, business plans, corridor assessments, and environmental analysis provide input to the identification of alternatives. The Contractor will prepare a brief technical memo outlining the universe of alternatives including routes, stations, service plans, frequencies, operating philosophies, and proposed approach for the alternatives analysis to the Commission for review and approval, including identification of criteria and the methodology for preliminary service development planning. 4.1 Alternatives Analysis The alternatives analysis criteria will address how alternatives will be determined to be reasonable and feasible in order to be carried forward into further analysis. The criteria will consider: • The purpose and need for the action; • Technical feasibility (physical route characteristics, potential constraints, capacity - constrained existing facilities or infrastructure, safety); • Economic feasibility (market potential and/or ridership, capital and operating costs); and • Major environmental concerns. 12 4.2 Preliminary Service Development Planning Methodology The Contractor will conduct an analysis and prepare an Alternatives Analysis Report for Commission review and approval. The alternatives analysis will include preliminary service planning elements such as: • Ridership forecasts and travel demand for this effort will be provided by Caltrans through the Intercity Rail Ridership Model. Service plans with each route and station alternatives need to be provided as input to the model. The Contractor will be responsible for coordinating data with Caltrans and evaluating and incorporating the results into the analysis. Additional factors such as travel time, service frequency, and price sensitivity will be included in the analysis. • Preliminary operating plans for each alternative developed through the use of railroad operation simulations, incorporating equipment options and both current and planned commuter and freight operations in the Corridor, which in turn reflect variables such as travel demand and rolling stock configuration. Operating plans will include both scenarios based on existing conditions and scenarios based on increased speeds, reliability, and frequencies. These service scenarios will form the basis for the environmental analysis. A description of the potential infrastructure improvements for each alternative. • Capital costs estimates for each alternative, including unit cost and quantities relating to comparable core track structures, stations, parking facilities, land acquisition, maintenance facilities, and any new facilities or upgrades required for operational control and management; a percentage allowance for contingencies; and any additional ongoing capital costs related to the alternative. • Operating and maintenance costs will be based upon an analysis of historic Amtrak operating and maintenance costs for the similar routes and projections related to the specific proposed service. This should include details necessary to discern differences in alternatives, costs for maintenance of way, maintenance of equipment, train movement, passenger traffic, and services such as marketing, reservations/information, station, and on -board services, general/administrative expenses, and cost -sharing arrangements with infrastructure owners and rail operators. • Potential phased implementation scenarios for the alternatives that can result in service improvements that have independent utility and reflect constructability considerations. • The outreach plan needs to be implemented early on in this initial phase to engage stakeholders and involved agencies to ensure that all potential alternatives and stations are identified and reviewed. After Commission approval of the alternatives analysis criteria and preliminary service development planning methodology the Contractor will develop conceptual engineering to a level sufficient to identify necessary infrastructure improvements and determine the cost estimates for each potential route alternative. This is anticipated to be the 13 "standard" 30 percent plans for general elements and additional engineering up to 65 percent plans at locations that may warrant additional detail. Conceptual engineering will include developing design criteria, track work concepts, structural concepts, roadway crossing recommendations, layover and storage/maintenance facility requirements, unit cost data, and conceptual plans. The Contractor will coordinate with the Commission and railroad owners and operators on this task. The conceptual engineering designs will form a basis for the footprint of the environmental analysis. Deliverables: • Purpose and Need Statement for Commission review and approval; • Technical memo on proposed alternatives analysis criteria and preliminary service development planning methodology for Commission review and approval; • Alternatives Analysis Report for Commission review and approval; • Conceptual engineering for alternatives for Commission review and acceptance; and • Outreach plan development. CHAPTER 5 — ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION Upon Commission approval of the Alternatives Analysis Report, the Commission will decide whether to proceed with the next steps of environmental documentation. The Contractor will need to provide a specific recommendation as to the type and scope of the environmental documentation needed to go forward based on the project understanding at the time, either an EA or a complete final EIS. The recommendation should consider the various alternatives for implementing the proposed passenger rail service, the conceptual engineering for construction projects necessary to implement those service alternatives, and the potential environmental impacts that may be associated with those projects at a general level of detail appropriate for the Corridor Program. This effort should meet both NEPA and CEQA requirements. Extensive coordination with the regulating agencies that will be reviewing and certifying these documents must be incorporated in all aspects of this task. This includes working with the FRA in scoping, reviews, publishing notices of intent (NOI), etc. It should be made clear this task shall be priced separately from the other tasks and will only be implemented upon approval by the Commission. For the development of the cost estimate in the proposal, it will be helpful to assume the exercise will require a full Tier 1 EIS. The approach can be modified. 5.1 NEPA/CEQA Scoping and Outreach In coordination with the Commission, the Contractor will conduct the scoping process to initiate the Environmental Documents, which will include: 14 " Identification of the Corridor study area; " Development of a NOI to prepare an EIS; " Development of the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan; " Holding scoping meetings with the public, stakeholders, and other agencies; " Finalization of the Purpose and Need Statement; " Preparation of a scoping report; and " Coordination with FRA and other approving authorities. A draft NOI will need to be prepared to initiate the scoping process. As part of scoping, the Purpose and Need Statement and the set of proposed alternatives detailed in the Alternatives Analysis Report will be refined through input from the public, government agencies, and other stakeholders. The Contractor, in coordination with the Commission, will develop the final Purpose and Need Statement for the Corridor Program and refine the set of proposed alternatives to be considered for further analysis in the environmental documents. To concurrently comply with CEQA requirements the scope of work needs to include preparation of a notice of preparation, draft and final environmental impact report (EIR), notice of completion, CEQA findings, statement of overriding considerations (if necessary), State Clearinghouse process, and related requirements. The Contractor will prepare and implement, in coordination with the Commission, the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. The plan will outline the public and agency involvement program and will identify key contacts within agencies, public officials, affected Native American Tribes, and other key stakeholder groups and the public. The plan will also identify key contacts with civic and business groups, relevant interest groups, present and potential riders/users, and private service providers/shippers. The plan will identify how involvement activities will be linked to key milestones in the planning and environmental analytic process, including public hearings on the draft EIS. This process will include all the elements to fulfill FRA's Section 106 responsibilities including tribal coordination. The Contractor will submit the Draft Public Involvement Plan for the Commission review. The final plan will be revised based on received comments and resubmitted to the Commission for approval. In addition, the Contractor will initiate the scoping process, in cooperation with the Commission, and will invite participation from federal, state, and local agencies, Native American tribes, other interested parties, and the public, as identified in the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. The Contractor will record the process and provide a summary of comments, responses, and conclusions in a scoping report for the 15 Commission review and approval. Deliverables: • Draft NOI; • Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan for the Commission review and acceptance; • Final Purpose and Need Statement for the Commission review and approval; • Scoping report for Commission review and acceptance; and • Continued FRA coordination, review and approvals as necessary. 5.2 Environmental Document & Section 4(f) Analysis The Contractor will prepare environmental document and focus on the likely environmental effects for the entire corridor relating to the type of service being proposed for the identified range of reasonable alternatives. The analysis of impacts will be based upon the conceptual engineering. The Contractor will prepare the environmental document as per NEPA, and comply with CEQA requirements. The Contractor will propose a methodology for impact analysis to Commission for review and approval prior to commencing the work. The Contractor will include impacts at a general level of detail for the Corridor associated with: • Route alternatives; • Cities and stations served; • Train service levels and frequency; • Train technology; • Train operating speeds; • Ridership projections; and • Major infrastructure components. Studies to be conducted as part of the NEPA evaluation process for the Corridor Program may include the following. A final list will be determined in conjunction with the Commission in the work plan and estimated budget: • Air quality • Water quality • Noise and vibration • Solid waste disposal • Ecological systems • Impacts on wetlands areas • Impacts on endangered species or wildlife • Flood hazards and floodplain management • Coastal zone management • Use of energy resources 16 • Use of other natural resources, such as water, minerals, or timber • Aesthetic and design quality impacts • Possible barriers to the elderly and handicapped • Land use, existing and planned • Environmental Justice • Public health • Public safety, including any impacts due to hazardous materials • Recreational opportunities • Socioeconomic " Historic, archeological, architectural, " Potential impacts to Section 4(f)- and cultural protected properties " Transportation " Construction period impacts The Contractor, in conjunction with Commission, will also identify strategies to avoid, minimize, or mitigate identified impacts. This will include coordination with appropriate resource agencies throughout the NEPA/CEQA process to manage any impacts identified during the development of the environmental document. Specific mitigation strategies will be developed and included in the environmental document as necessary by resource area, based on the following approaches: " Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; " Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; " Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; " Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; and " Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. This task will also include preparation of the environmental document. The Contractor will prepare an annotated outline of the proposed document for Commission review and approval. The Contractor will then prepare an administrative draft for Commission and FRA review and approval. Modifications to the administrative draft requested by Commission will be incorporated to produce a draft for circulation. The Contractor will prepare and submit to Commission a draft notice of availability (NOA) for the draft document. The Contractor will also distribute the draft document to agencies and stakeholders, as outlined in the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. In addition, the Contractor will coordinate with FRA and other respective agencies to publish the NOI, DEIS, NOA, FEIS, and ROD in the Federal Register as required. The Contractor, in close coordination with Commission and FRA, will respond to comments from the draft document and prepare the final document. The Contractor will prepare an administrative final document for FRA review and approval. Modifications to the administrative final document requested by FRA will be incorporated to produce a final document for circulation. The Contractor will prepare and submit to FRA a draft NOA. The Contractor will also distribute the final document to agencies and stakeholders, as outlined in the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. Additionally, the Contractor, in coordination with FRA, will identify the next steps required in the environmental process, including identifying the necessary Tier-2 project -level NEPA documents required. The commitments agreed upon by the 17 agencies throughout the NEPA process will be included in the draft ROD, which the Contractor will submit to FRA for review and consideration. A constant line of communication between the Contractor and Commission will be maintained throughout the entire NEPA process. Deliverables: • Impact analysis methodology for FRA review and acceptance; • Annotated EIS outline for FRA review and acceptance; • Administrative draft document for FRA review and comment; • Draft document and draft NOA for FRA review and approval; • Administrative final document for FRA review and comment; • Final document and draft NOA for FRA review and approval; and • Draft ROD CHAPTER 6 — SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT The Contractor will produce a SDP for the final selected alternative in close coordination with the Commission and FRA. The SDP will lay out the overall scope and approach for the proposed service by clearly demonstrating the purpose and need for new rail service; analyzing alternatives for the proposed new service and identifying the alternative that would best address the identified purpose and need; demonstrating the operational and financial feasibility of the alternative proposed to be pursued; and describing how the implementation of the SDP will be divided into discrete phases. Specifically, the Contractor will include within the SDP: • Purpose and need, including a description of the transportation challenges and opportunities faced in the markets to be served by the proposed service; • Service rationale to demonstrate how the proposed service can cost-effectively address transportation and other needs, based on current and forecasted travel demand and capacity condition; • Planning methodology used in developing the SDP; • Identification of alternatives, including rail improvements, improvements to other modes including bus, and a no -build alternative; • Operations modeling, including railroad operation simulations, equipment and crew scheduling analyses, and terminal, yard, and support operations, which in turn reflect such variables as travel demand and rolling stock configuration. If the proposed service shares facilities with rail freight, commuter rail, or other intercity passenger rail services, the existing and future characteristics of those services will be included; • Station access and analysis to address the location of the stations to be served by the proposed service, how these stations will accommodate the proposed service, how passengers will access the stations, and how the stations will be integrated with connections to other modes of transportation; 18 " Demand and revenue forecasts, including the methods, assumptions, and outputs for travel demand forecasts, and the expected revenue from the service, including ridership/revenue forecasts that specify the number of passengers and boardings/disembarking at stations; " Financial performance and projections for each phase of service, including operating costs and revenues, capital replacement costs, and other institutional arrangements affecting the system finances. The SDP will address the methods, assumptions and outputs for operating expenses for the train service including maintenance of way, maintenance of equipment, transportation (train movement), passenger traffic and services such as marketing, reservations/information, station, and on -board services, general/administrative expenses, cost -sharing arrangements, and access fees; " Capital programming at a level sufficient to identify necessary infrastructure improvements and to determine the cost estimates. This would include equipment, infrastructure improvements, facilities, and other investments required for each discrete phase of service implementation; " Cost -benefit analysis of the Project, which shall include such factors as the Project's estimated ridership and anticipated user and public benefits, relative to the proposed investment, and consideration of enhanced mobility, environmental, and economic benefits (both for the specific Project proposal and in terms of the costs and benefits generated by the specific Project within a network context); and " Additional benefits should be analyzed such as job creation and retention, "green" environmental outcomes, potential energy savings, and effects on community livability. The Contractor will prepare a technical memo that includes the proposed annotated outline for the Corridor Program SDP and details the proposed methodology for analyzing the required SDP components. Contractor will submit the technical memo to the Commission for review and approval. Upon approval, the Contractor will develop a draft SDP for Commission review and approval utilizing the agreed upon outline and methodology. The Contractor will incorporate the Commission comments into the final SDP for the Corridor Program. Deliverables: " Technical memo on SDP Outline and Methodology for FRA review and acceptance; " Draft SDP for FRA review and approval; and " Final SDP. CHAPTER 7  PROJECT MANAGEMENT The Contractor is responsible for facilitating the coordination of all activities among the Commission, relevant host railroads, and FRA for implementation of the Project. Upon award of the Project, the Commission will monitor and evaluate the Project's progress 19 through the administration of regular progress meetings scheduled throughout the Project's duration. Good program management and quality assurance practices must be implemented on the project. As part of the Project's administration, the Contractor will: • Hold regularly scheduled Project meetings with Commission; • Maintain the Administrative Record for the Project, to be submitted to FRA upon Project completion. A Project master file will contain copies of reports, correspondence, and other documents and will be compiled and recorded in the Administrative Record; • Perform periodic Project status reviews and meetings with relevant stakeholders at various locations within the Project area including the Coachella Valley; • Comply with Commission Project reporting requirements, including: a. Status of Project by task breakdown and percent complete; b. Changes and reason for change in Project's scope, schedule and/or budget; c. Description of unanticipated problems and any resolution since the immediately preceding progress report; d. Summary of work scheduled for the next progress period; and e. Updated Project schedule. The day-to-day project management tasks will be performed by RCTC Rail Manager Sheldon Peterson, Project Lead Staff. 20 RCTC Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass Rail FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LTF LTF Carryover Prop 1 B (Security) STA Other CV General Rail Management $ 189,439 - - $ 189,439 Subtotal: Operating $ 189,439 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 189,439 $ - Subtotal: Capital $ - - - - Total: Operating & Capital $ 189,439 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 189,439 $ - 21 Revised 5/28/2015 Summary of FY 2015/16 Funds Requested.xls Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 16 - 1 PROJECT NAME: CV General Rail Management PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: Cover the PA&ED or Environmental Documentation that is separate from the SDP along with portions of the SDP. It will also cover additional planning that may not be covered by the Prop 1 B Grant as we move forward. It will also cover any incidental RCTC agency costs related to the project salaries etc that are not eligible to be reimbursed through the Prop 1 B grant. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by local funds subject to the Coachella Valley rail split to fund the environmental study. This project will not include Proposition 1 B PTMISEA funding. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA (Coachella Valley Rail Split) $189,439 Total $189,439 22 RCTC Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass Rail Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 and FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LTF STA Transfer In Other CV General Rail Management $ 157,184 - - $ 157,184 - - Subtotal: Operating $ 157,184 $ - • $ - $ 157,184 $ - $ - Subtotal: Capital $ - - - - - - Total: Operating & Capital $ 157,184 $ - $ - $ 157,184 I $ - $ - Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LTF STA Transfer In Other CV General Rail Management $ 161,900 - - $ 161,900 - - Subtotal: Operating $ 161,900 $ - $ - $ 161,900 $ - $ - Subtotal: Capital $ - - - - - - Total: Operating & Capital $ 161,900 $ - $ - $ 161,900 $ - $ - 23 Revised 5/28/2015 Summary of FY 2015/16 Funds Requested.xls Table 5.1A— Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 17 - 1 PROJECT NAME: CV General Rail Management PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: Cover the PA&ED or Environmental Documentation that is separate from the SDP. It will also cover additional planning that may not be covered by the Prop 1 B Grant as we move forward. It will also cover any incidental RCTC agency costs related to the project salaries etc that are not eligible to be reimbursed through the Prop 1 B grant. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by local funds subject to the Coachella Valley rail split to fund the environmental study. This project will not include Proposition 1 B PTMISEA funding. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA (Coachella Valley Rail Split) $157,184 Total $157,184 24 Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 18 - 1 PROJECT NAME: CV General Rail Management PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: Cover the PA&ED or Environmental Documentation that is separate from the SDP. It will also cover additional planning that may not be covered by the Prop 1 B Grant as we move forward. It will also cover any incidental RCTC agency costs related to the project salaries etc that are not eligible to be reimbursed through the Prop 1 B grant. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by local funds subject to the Coachella Valley rail split to fund the environmental study. This project will not include Proposition 1 B PTMISEA funding. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA (Coachella Valley Rail Split) $161,900 Total $161,900 25 TABLE 9 — SRTP HIGHLIGHTS Specific highlights of the FY 2015/16 Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass Rail plan include: RCTC is continuing to work on the first phase of the Federal Railroad Administration process which is expected to be completed in fall 2015. Some of the elements completed and underway are: o Completion of the Market Analysis, o Start of the Alternative Analysis; and o Preliminary Service Development Plan As part of this process RCTC has formed a Technical Advisory Committee comprised of regional stakeholders and an Ad Hoc Committee of its Commission members. Public meetings were held in February 2015 and RCTC is continuing to keep the public engaged by encouraging feedback about service routes, stations, ridership and other elements through online survey, the project website and social media. In our continued effort to this project, RCTC and Caltrans partnered to submit a grant to the Federal Administration and on April 16 were awarded $2.9 million. The funds will be available for the drafting of a full Service Development Plan and the appropriate environmental studies needed for project approval. 26 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY BLYTHE, CALIFORNIA SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 - 2017/18 FINAL DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1— System Overview Page Service Area 4 Demographics 4 Service Profile 4 System Map 5 Fare Schedule 6 Fleet & Maintenance 7 Facilities 8 Coordination 9 Chapter 2 — Services & Performance Blue Route 1 Blythe City Circulator 11 Gold Route 2 Palo Verde College Crosstown 12 Red Route 3 CA Prisons Express 13 Green Route 4 Rural Rider 14 Silver Route 5 Saturday Service 15 Desert Road TRIP 16 PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride 17 Performance 18 Growth and Planning 19 Passenger Amenities and Equipment Needs 20 Chapter 3 — Service Changes Route Changes and Modifications Marketing Plans and Promotion s Chapter 4 — Finances & Capital Plans 22 23 Operating Budget 25 Capital Budget 25 Compliance Requirements 25 Data Tables (Start) 26 2 Chapter 1— System Overview 3 Service Area Geographically, the Palo Verde Valley is located approximately 170 miles east of Riverside along Interstate 10 at the Colorado River. The service area is primarily based within the City of Blythe, and the unincorporated Riverside County areas of Mesa Verde and Ripley. Also, part of the greater area is the California State prison facilities of Ironwood and Chuckawalla, approximately 20 miles west of the valley along Interstate 10. Demographics The valley's population is approximately 20,000 residents. Population growth in the valley is increasing at an average of about one percent per year. The valley is agriculturally diverse providing many outdoor jobs and direct support to the local community. Major employers include the Ironwood State Prison and Chuckawalla Valley State Prison. Service Profile The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) provides many transit options to serve senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and the general public. PVVTA services are known to the general public under the marketing name "Desert Roadrunner ". PVVTA provides five deviated fixed routes in the Palo Verde Valley, which serve Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde, Palo Verde College, California Department of Corrections facilities, and limited service to Ehrenberg, Arizona. ADA Para -transit is also provided after hours on the Fixed Routes through route deviation requests. The routes can deviate up to 3/4 of a mile away from the actual mapped routes. Hours of operation for the Fixed Route system are Monday through Friday from 5:00 am to 6:30 pm, and 8:00 am to 1:00 pm on Saturday and limited holidays. The Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project provides transportation reimbursement to individuals unable to access PVVTA Fixed Route services. The PVVTA's transit services are contracted with Transportation Concepts of Irvine, California. Transportation Concepts has been providing transit service for PVVTA since October of 2003. PVVTA also has an agreement with the Independent Living Partnership to administer the (Desert RoadTRIP) that has been in place since 1995. 4 m Zit mI 1 SVNID N3 D C' I VW) m a MR )11lVd NIM33Rb 3f1N3Atf,,IVI • m ao n Sldti 1101N3S OVVNWEI D And lb X �danw 3 b Z i ClUtfNaVEI °Two AlO X d31ND 31AI) n r 3 �Avi tioisNvia I L. J 311N3AV4101: r O Z O T TI z 3931103 dVW W31SAS V1AAd 70,vd asn� �3 SNOSIdd tra e1 r rI ml 1.3 �l1 J 31VDS 0110N Fare Schedule PVVTA's fare structure is sensitive to the local economy while attempting to maintain the mandated 10 percent Farebox Recovery Ratio. The schedule includes full fare and discounted ride tickets. PVVTA's fare schedule has been in place, with no increase since July 1, 2010. In fiscal year 2015/16, staff will analyze the farebox recovery ratio and fare structure at mid -year to determine if a fare change is necessary. If so, staff will propose to the Board of Directors a change to the fare structure. Prior to any proposed fare changes, PVVTA would hold a public hearing in order to receive public input on any change to the Fare Schedule. PVVTA Fare & Pass Schedule Fixed Route Cash Fare — Routes 1, 2, 4, 5 General Public (ages 5-59 years old) Seniors (ages 60 years or older) Persons with Disabilities (with ADA Card) Children ages 5 and under* (first boarding with full fare adult) Children ages 5 and under* (second & third boarding with full fare adult) * Free for the first (1) child, $0.80 for child 2 & 3 boarding with a fare paying adult; Full Fare for all other accompanying children. $1.65 $0.80 $0.80 Free $0.80 Arizona Zone Fare for travel to and from Ehrenberg, Arizona General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities $5.00 Fixed Route Cash Fare — Route 3 Express General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities Route Deviations (one way to or from route) Route Deviations — All Fixed Routes Route Deviations (one way to or from route) DV8 Card (8 one way deviation fazes)*** ***Not valid for initial passenger fare, only for payment of route deviation fee. Fixed Route Go Passes 10-Ride Punch Pass S/D 10-Ride Punch Pass General Public 31-Day Pass Seniors 31-Day Pass Persons with Disabilities Summer Youth Pass 10-Ride Punch Pass 10-Ride Punch Pass 20-Ride Punch Pass General Public 31-Day Pass (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Ehrenberg, Arizona) (Route 3 Express) (Route 3 Express) (Route 3 Express) $3.30 $0.80 $0.80 $6.40 $16.50 $ 8.00 $43.00 $28.00 $28.00 $40.00 $50.00 $ 33.00 $ 66.00 $120.00 Other Cash Fare — X-Tend-A-Ride General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities $5.00 6 Fleet and Maintenance PVVTA operates vehicles using Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), gasoline and diesel. The fleet consists of eight active transit vehicles and five active support vehicles. Most of the vehicles are interchangeable between routes. When vehicles are retired, they are declared surplus property and sold at a city auction. PVVTA adheres to all Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and California Highway Patrol (CHP) mandated Preventive Maintenance Inspection criteria and is very proactive in maintenance efforts. In the past, vehicle maintenance was provided under contract with the City of Blythe Central Garage. In Fiscal Year 2015/16, maintenance will be provided by Transportation Concepts. Emergency Reserve Fleet As PVVTA adds new vehicles into service, older units are rotated into an emergency contingency fleet that would be implemented only as needed for emergency and public safety use. With extreme heat conditions and remote location in the Palo Verde Valley, a reserve fleet would better prepare the community in times of power outages where these vehicles would be used to transport affected residents to cooling centers within the area. For other emergency events such as floods or the breakdown of larger passenger buses on Interstate 10, this fleet would be able to assist with a large movement of passengers to safety, freeing up local law enforcement to better deal with the situation at hand. 7 Facilities PVVTA finished construction on the new Operations Center in December 2014. The new facility which is adjacent to the Main Street Park N Ride (PNR) allows users the comfort of a "one stop" shop for all their transportation needs. The new operations center houses all PVVTA assets and centrally locates all operations personnel in the same building. In the years to come, PVVTA will look to developing the site around the operations center to meet the need for a maintenance center, bus wash and covered solar parking at the PNR. A solar project using State Low Carbon Transit Operations Program is slated for fruition in FY 2015/16 and beyond. This project would include solar panels to offset energy usage and installation of an EV charging station for use at the Park N Ride. Funds have been requested and PVVTA is looking towards partnerships to maximize the benefit of this project. S The Blythe CNG Station has proven to be a great resource to local and regional fuel needs for Compressed Natural Gas. Since the station opened in 2014, a steady increase in the number of vehicles especially commercial fleets has been seen monthly. Currently, PVVTA staff is working on expanding the station to accommodate the ever growing demand for CNG along the Interstate 10 corridor. PVVTA has seen vehicles use the station from travelers as far away as Canada who use this strategic route due to the reliability in CNG fuel availability. Expansion of the station will take time and would not hinder the operation of bus services. The hope is to partner with other fuel providers to cover the cost of the expansion. Coordination PVVTA actively coordinates service and training with Quartzsite Transit (QTS) who operates one fixed route in the PVVTA Service Area. QTS provides service from Quartzsite Arizona daily and connects with the PVVTA system at the Kmart Transfer Center. QTS and PVVTA meet monthly to address any operational issues and to provide joint training exercises to staff. These exercises include emergency training, operations and administration support development. PVVTA is part of the Western Arizona Council of Government's Transportation Coordinated Council which has a goal of coordinating 10 regional providers within Arizona towards seamless service. PVVTA operates one deviated fixed route in Ehrenberg Arizona which is one mile east of the California / Arizona border on the I-10. The route takes riders into Blythe for transfer to other PVVTA routes. 9 Chapter 2 — Services & Performance 10 Blue Route 1— Deviated Fixed Route City of Blythe Circulator Blue Route 1 serves the growing community of Blythe providing riders access to many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices within the City of Blythe. Destinations on Blue Route 1 include: Blythe City Hall, Big Kmart, All Star Cinemas, Albertsons, Rite Aid, Palo Verde Hospital, Palo Verde Unified School District schools, Employment Development Department, Department of Motor Vehicles, Post Office, Blythe Central Garage and Public Works Department, California Highway Patrol, Senior Nutrition Program, Palo Verde Valley District Library, and various other shopping locations within the community. The route can deviate for passengers up to 3/4 of mile with a 30-minute advance reservation or upon boarding. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and Social Security (SSA) Transfer Center. Blue Route I operates deviated service in a clockwise loop type of route providing a 60-minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Blue Route 1 operates from 7:30 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency observed holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 Minor changes in routing; staff will continue to monitor service. 2017 Implement an opposite bus on the same route in 30-minute headways during peak hours. 2018 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. mli 1 PVHS loth Ave N. BROADWAY Z KMART a� 0 �Chanslorway 2 B.rnard E CIVIC co a amBALDWIN U 1 m 7thHobsonway 14t" Ave ENCINAS 410 11 Gold Route 2 — Deviated Fixed Route Palo Verde College Crosstown Gold Route 2 provides riders access between the city of Blythe and Palo Verde College. This feeder route provides connections to many civic, educational, and county sponsored public social service offices, Blythe City Hall, All Star Cinemas, Big Kmart, Albertsons, Rite Aid, Palo Verde Hospital, Colorado River Fair, Employment Development Department, Blythe Recreation Center, Palo Verde Valley District Library, Palo Verde College main campus, and various other shopping locations within the community. The route can deviate for passengers up to 3/4 of mile with a 30-minute advance reservation or upon boarding. Connections to ail other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and other major trip generators. Gold Route 2 operates on a two-way route providing a 60-minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Gold Route 2 operates from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on: weekends and all Agency -observed holidays. This route does not operate when the college is not in session. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 Add tripper service along Chanslorway twice daily; staff will continue to monitor service. 2017 Possibly expand route service and schedule depending on availability of funds. 2018 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 6t" Ave PV College lu Riverside Barnard c KMART ° Murphy � INTAKE Hobsonway CIVIC 7th 12 Red Route 3 — Deviated Fixed Route CA Prisons Express The Red Route 3 provides premium commuter service between Blythe and Chuckawalla Valley & Ironwood State Prisons, Monday through Friday with three AM and three PM trips. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive, then travels via Interstate 10 to the prisons. The Red Route 3 operates from 5:00 am to 7:30 am and again from 2:00 pm to 5:30 pm, Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency or State observed holidays. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and Social Security (SSA) Transfer Center. Special fares are charged on this route. All passengers pay $3.30 one way. There are 10 and 20 ride GoPasses available, as well as a $120.00, 31-Day GoPass which gives unlimited rides on all Desert Roadrunner buses for the month. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 Eliminate (1) Am trip due to low ridership; staff will continue to monitor service. 2017 Possibly expand route service and schedule depending on availability of funds. 2018 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. JVA PRISONS 1-10 MESA SR-78 � .. Nem PNR KMART � H o bso nway 13 Green Route 4 - Deviated Fixed Route Rural Rider The Green Route 4 provides deviated fixed route service between Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde, and Ehrenberg, Arizona. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to State Route 78, then travels South to Ripley, West to Mesa Verde via Interstate 10 and services Ehrenberg, Arizona. The Green Route 4 operates three round trips 7:00 am to 4:00 pm Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on: weekends and all Agency or State observed holidays. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, K-Mart Transfer Center and other major trip generators. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 Add a 6pm outbound trip to County areas; staff will continue to monitor service. 2017 Expand evening service if feasible. 2018 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. MESA SR-78 KMART 7th EHRENBERG 411. 00 Hobsonway cci RIPLEY MARINA RIVIERA 14 Silver Route 5 — Deviated Fixed Route Saturday Service The Silver Route 5 provides system -wide deviated fixed route service within the city of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde, and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. This route serves all major trip -generating areas within the system on 90-minute headways. The Silver Route 5 operates 8:00 am to 3:00 pm Saturday and Agency observed holiday operating days. Services are not provided on: Monday through Friday and all Agency observed non -operating holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 Reduce service hours to mid -day trips providing only 4 hours of service daily. 2017 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. 2018 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. MESA K-MART 'SR-78 RIPLEY Chanslo k.vay SODWay S. BROADWAY f • EHRENBERG 15 Desert Road TRIP Trip Reimbursement PVVTA's Desert RoadTRIP program currently provides reimbursement to individuals who do not have access to local transportation. Desert RoadTRIP will be marketed and promoted in conjunction with Independent Living Partnership to seniors (age 60 years or older), persons with disabilities and truly needy persons who live outside the service area, such as Lost Lake, resort communities along U.S. Highway 95, and Desert Center. Desert RoadTRIP participants can travel up to 460 miles a month, including using Greyhound (690 miles for a farnily).This equals $147.20 per month ($220.80 for a family per month). In Fiscal Year 2013/14, the TRIP program provided 18 valley residents with mileage reimbursement support for 342 one-way trips and 46,634 miles of escort assisted transportation to distant medical services for a total service cost of $9,376.46. This breaks down to a one-way trip cost of $27.42 per trip and a .20 cents per mile subsidy. In Fiscal Year 2010/11, a minimal fare of $5 per roundtrip was added for the Desert RoadTrip service. The fare was added to help maintain and meet the farebox requirement of 10 percent for the TRIP program. After analyzing the TRIP program, it was determined the program was still not meeting the required Farebox requirement, therefore, the Board approved implementing the $5 fare per one-way trip making it $10 per round trip. This change became effective in March 2012 and since the implementation of the fare change, the TRIP program has continued to meet the farebox requirement. Volunteer drivers will continue to be recruited in order to guarantee Desert RoadTRIP users have escort transportation. PVVTA is also a partner in the Volunteer Driver Corps program. Desert RoadTRIP is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 Due to the increase of participants in the program, an increase in funding was approved in FY 15 which will remain the same for FY16. Minor changes may be proposed in order to keep the program within budget. Staff will continue to monitor the service. 2017 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2018 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 16 PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride Community -Based Service Link PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride is a demand responsive service to address special areas in time where community events require general public transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system. Events in the evening, on no service days, and beyond fixed route hours would be the primary focus of this new service. X-Tend-A-Ride will provide curb -to -curb service with an exclusive fare targeted to meet farebox performance requirements. During a pre -planned community event, riders would be directed to fixed route service during regular operating hours. X-Tend-A-Ride would be available to provide service beyond regular operating hours. Similar trail service has been utilized for Sober Driver needs, added service to the local fair, and special community events needing public awareness. PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride will not operate in place of fixed route services. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2017 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2018 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 17 Performance In FY 2013/14, PVVTA realigned routes system -wide. From those changes, several enhancements and very few issues have developed. Services are now timed and revolve around a central hub location at the K-Mart Transfer Center making travel system -wide seamless and easy for most transit dependent riders. Issues have risen from extended routing to outlying areas where trips are very unproductive in ridership. Along with the enhancements, an addition of tripper service to the Palo Verde College has spurt new growth from student riders using the bus service to attend classes during the school day. Timing routes to meet class schedule and college sessions limit unproductive service and has become reliable to the point that students pick transit over other ride alternatives. Over the holiday month of December, ridership systematically increases due to additional service placed on the fixed routes for holiday decoration viewing and services to community events over the season. Tethering services to community events along the routes has grown over the years and is now steady and predictable. Planning is made to limit services to the times and periods where transit can attract the most ridership. Green Route 4, now beyond exempt status, continues to grow and shows a positive performance trend. Key trip generators and demographics of the areas served by Route 4 show many riders traveling from affordable housing to shopping and work opportunities. Currently, service on this route will increase slightly with a PM tripper due to demand for service. Staff as always continues to monitor and promote services in the unincorporated areas of Riverside County. For the Silver Route 5, service will once again be reduced by one hour daily to better mirror ridership trends on the route. The plan is to continue to operate Saturday service mindful of the performance and adherence to the farebox recovery ratio. 18 Growth and Planning PVVTA continues to look towards partnerships with local businesses within the service area to expand passenger amenities and incentive programs for riders. PVVTA through local and regional permitting review, implemented several proposed improvements to the system including rerouting of services to new trip generators, addition of new bus stop amenities, and anticipated demand to new trip generating anchors in East Blythe spawning future planning for services along the Colorado River corridor. This growth of major shopping and eating areas in the east end of the service area was predicted and planned for FY 2007/08. Since the economic downturn, planning for services slowed down but PVVTA is ready and has plans to address such growth. Another area of interest continues to be the solar projects just west and south of the Palo Verde Valley. Transportation is a major key in balancing traffic flow and intrusion on several desert areas. With a minor increase of short - time workers and more permanent jobs once the solar fields are built, public transit will need to bridge the gap between the Palo Verde Valley, Desert Center, Chiriaco Summit, and the Coachella Valley. PVVTA hopes that sometime soon, Sunline and RCTC will look to partner to meet this growing need. PVVTA is part of the Western Arizona call for projects in hopes of funding existing service provided in Ehrenberg, Arizona through a rider pass program. WACOG is very interested in partnering with PVVTA and other regional Arizona operators to bridge the gaps in service between remote communities such as Quartzsite, Parker, Yuma and Blythe. PVVTA has started to receive 5310 funds through a rider pass program for service to low-income seniors and person with disabilities in the Ehrenberg area. This area is within one air mile of the California border and residents utilize almost 90 percent of all needed services in Blythe, California. PVVTA provides shopping, medical, and education based trips to those in Ehrenberg. Any new funding would offset the current cost of operation. 19 Passenger Amenities PVVTA has implemented and will continue to develop more user friendly and ADA compliant bus stop and transfer areas. PVVTA has added Simmie Seats at stops that may not allow for a full size bench. The remote surveillance project is up and running providing dispatch and the public with real-time information on traffic and passenger safety at several bus stops. Surveillance is used to better plan and keep safe passengers boarding at key locations. Use of the system for traffic management is used to reroute vehicles to reduce late buses and keeping the service on -time. Plans are in the works to beatify and modernize several bus stops and the Main Street PNR. 20 Chapter 3 — Service Changes 21 Route Changes and Modifications Blue Route 1 will continue to serve the Baldwin Senior Apartments and Casa Encinas on request only. Gold Route 2 will provide (2) two one way trips along Chanslorway at peak hours as tripper service. Red Route 3 will eliminate the 5:40am outbound trip to the prison due to low ridership. Green Route 4 will provide a 6pm outbound trip by request only. Silver Route 5 will be reduced to (4) hours of service daily. 22 Promotions The following marketing efforts will be utilized to promote ridership growth in FY 2015/16. 1. Continuation of the marketing program, which includes brochures, flyers, advertisements in local newspapers, community transit fairs, participation in community events, and promotional materials. 2. Continuation of public outreach program, which includes meetings with schools, employers, senior service programs, persons with disabilities programs, social service agencies, the general public, city departments, and other organizations that benefit from public transportation in the Palo Verde Valley. 3. Continuing the Mobility Training program to teach the public about public transportation, including those with disabilities. 4. Continue to offer information on Rideshare programs available to residents and visitors of the Palo Verde Valley. 5. Continue to foster new partnerships with LaPaz County, Palo Verde College Association of Student Governments, and new businesses coming to the city through the Shop, Save and Get Home Free Program. 23 Chapter 4 — Financial & Capital Plans Operating Budget The proposed Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency's operating budget for fiscal year 2015/16 is $988,075, which is an increase of 5 percent over last year's operating budget. The increase is primarily due to the annual operating and maintenance costs of the new CNG Station and the new Transit Facility. The Agency's budget includes only those expenses for the day-to-day operations of the Transit Agency. Expenses will be monitored closely to assure the Agency continues to operate within its budget and is compliant with the mandatory 10 percent farebox recovery ratio. Capital Budget The Agency's capital budget for FY 2015/16 is $341,788, which includes Prop 1B funding for two replacement buses and Prop 1B Homeland Security Funds for the Surveillance Infrastructure Maintenance Project. Also included in capital is STA funding for the purchase of a support vehicle, pressure washer trailer and bulk purchase of tires, filters, coolant, etc. The Agency also applied for Low Carbon Transit Operation Program grant funds, which will be used toward the Operations Facility Solar Project. Regulatory and Compliance Requirements PVVTA adheres to all regulatory and compliance requirements as mandated by the Riverside County Transportation Commission and/or other regulatory agencies, as it pertains to ADA, DBE, EEO, etc. A Triennial Audit was performed for the period of July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2012, in which there were only three recommendations for improvements made by the auditor. Pursuant to the audit performed, the recommendations were: 1.) Exempt both Fare Revenue and Operating Cost from New Services in the Fiscal Audit. 2.) Develop a Succession Plan for the Finance Director position. 3.) Include Year -to -Date and Prior Year -to -Date Performance Data in the Quarterly Operations Data Report. PVVTA has already addressed all three recommendations outlined in the Triennial Audit. 25 MIME Mow — limn& [as I -.p. _.n Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2012 2002 2003 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2014 2009 2009 CMD EDN FRC FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD FRD ZZZ ZZZ 4 22 28 2 5 18 18 18 5 26 26 26 2 26 26 a 1 1 0 a 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 0 1 1 GA DF DF GA GA GA GA CN GA CN CN CN CN CN CN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25,660 358,556 213,829 11,476 77,739 115,301 174,622 87,590 12,818 56,238 73,149 68,034 25 173,675 180,416 25,660 11,476 77,739 115,301 174,622 87,590 12,818 56,238 73,149 68,034 25 173,675 180,416 Totals: N TransTrack Manager" 3'2E12015 252 10 13 2 1,629,128 125,318 Page 1 of 1 I` ` - Um -kit [Jun 1.-x:p7iciim tartrnmEn Table 2 -- Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 7 6 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $444,691 $469,112 $937,289 $670,109 $988,075 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $61,441 $64,116 $104,830 $105,398 $135,650 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $383,250 $404,996 $832,459 $564,710 $852,425 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 11,745 44,432 46,043 39,427 50,004 Passenger Miles 459,195 622,048 644,602 551,978 700,056 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 8,835.0 8,817.0 9,230.0 6,604.0 8,828.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 178,096.0 176,421.0 180,755.0 129,254.0 172,767.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 219,341.0 223,061.0 222,519.0 159,778.0 213,034.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $50.33 $53.21 $101.55 $101.47 $111.93 Farebox Recovery Ratio 13.82% 13.67% 11.18°/u 15.73% 13.72% Subsidy per Passenger $9.18 $9.12 $18.08 $14.32 $17.05 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.83 $0.65 $1.29 $1.02 $1.22 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $43.38 $45.93 $90.19 $85.51 $96.56 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.15 $2.30 $4.61 $4.37 $4.93 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.7 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.23 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.29 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. N v TransTrack Manager"' 4/15/2015 Page 1 of linrido Emory 1v.p:hdu tnmeirsim Table 2 -- PVVTA-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 6 6 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $433,971 $458,913 $913,029 $659,587 $971,025 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $60,161 $62,616 $103,135 $103,938 $131,150 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $373,809 $396,297 $809,894 $555,648 $839,875 Operating Characteristics • Unlinked Passenger Trips 41,745 44,432 46,043 39,427 50,004 Passenger Miles 459,195 622,048 644,602 551,978 700,056 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 8,835.0 8,817.0 9,230.0 6,604.0 8,828.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 178,096.0 176,421.0 180,755.0 129,254.0 172,767.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 219,341.0 223,061.0 222,519.0 159,778.0 213,034.0 Performance Characteristics I , Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $49,12 $52.05 $98.92 $99.88 $109.99 Farebox Recovery Ratio 13.86% 13.64% 11.29% 15.76% 13.50% Subsidy per Passenger $8.95 $8.92 $17.59 $14.09 $16.80 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0,81 $0.64 $1.26 $1.01 $1.20 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $42.31 $44.95 $87.75 $84.14 $95.14 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.10 $2.25 $4.48 $4.30 $4.86 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4.7 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.23 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.29 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. N co TransTrack Manager"" 4/15/2015 Page I of I rINN= tiesride Ceuey imeroiciien faeaemsce Table 2 -- Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 7 6 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $243,955 $469,112 $937,289 $670,109 $988,075 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $28,399 $64,116 $104,830 $105,398 $135,650 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $215,556 $404,996 $832,459 $564,710 $852,425 Operating Characteristics ~ Unlinked Passenger Trips 23,742 11,432 46,043 39,427 50,004 Passenger Miles 261,162 622,048 644,602 551,978 700,056 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 4,936.0 8,817.0 9,230.0 6,604.0 8,828.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 81,219.0 176,421.0 180,755.0 129,254.0 172,767.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 118,488.0 223,061.0 222,519.0 159,778.0 213,034.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $49.42 $53.21 $101.55 $101.47 $111.93 Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.64% 13.67% 11.18% 15.73% 13.72% Subsidy per Passenger $9,08 $9.12 $18.08 $14.32 $17.05 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.83 $0.65 $1.29 $1.02 $1.22 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $43.67 $45.93 $90.19 85.51 $96.56 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.65 $2.30 $4.61 $4.37 $4.93 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 4,8 5,0 5,0 6,0 5.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.29 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. N TransTrack Manager"' 4/15/2015 Page 1 of 1 Z!u T abed ETOZIS[!a „ura6eueig peasuau O C'] SZVZ58$ 059`5£3 SLO'896$ O'bE0'ETZ 0'L9L'ZLI 0'TS OT O'8Z8'9 9S0'00L 600'05 slelol aapinoad a:was Oss'ZT$ OOs'b$ OSO'LT$ 51,Z'SZ$ SE6'E$ 09T`6Z$ 06170£'EI 0 56£'L 0-99E 0"15£ 0917'5T 06E'T [ 6LE'LTT$ 09E`9T$ 6£L'S£T$ O'TTO'SE O'TT0'LE 0'99£'Z 0"69Z'T SLWOOT LLT'L T LO6'6OZ$ 99L'Z£$ sEatt.z$ 0'ILT'Z9 O'9ET'S17 0%,ZZ'E O'STCZ bTS'OSI TSL'OT Z L98'092$ L59`06$ I,ZS'TOES 0'890'Zb 0'6ET'96 0"90E'Z O'Tat 1,ST'ZSZ TIO'91 I LLV9Z1.$ Olb's€$ L99'T9Z$ 0'01WLE 0"980'LE O L99'Z 0"ZZ9'Z OSVLLT 5L9'ZT T Aep pam homes Aep pam Aep paM Aep pam Aep paM IdVO-tl1AAd S-NahAd atl1AAd E-tl1Af5d Z-tl1Md T-VJ AAd Ap!sgns }aM11 anuanay aa6uassed tsdJ fiugeaadp sal�W saI!W anuanay sanOH 1 e}01 sanOH anuanaa aa6uassed saaSuassed saRWaA Head adhl Aea # alnoa s}uawan a}ea sa3noa IIV 9T/STOZ AA S -- Apua6y 4Isue.il Aalleq apaan oiled sops ais aanp?/ dl?IS - £ a19p1 ...+� inmiltl6a,1 (srv7 i1 moN zz abed STOZISI/b „u.tadeung varisumu c7 fir0 L'S £6'1:$ 9S'96$ ZZ'I$ SOLI$ '/0ZL'£T 9L'fil$ ZL'S$ £fi'TII$ sleyolAapinaMaVIJag 6T•0 6r0 bZ'0 6r0 DEO Ob L'S 9'b 6'L 8'D Tb E$ LT'£$ S9'b$ S9'S$ Tr9$ Z6-TL$ Os"Z6$ L9'068 LS-4T O 8E-98$ 0E-T$ LT'T$ 6E'T$ EO'T$ 8Z'T$ 9r9T$ SE'9T$ ZS'6T$ MAO L9'LT$ "/o6E'92 9 96 £T %ZS'£T °I.86'ET %ZS'ET 66'6Z$ T6'8T$ LS'ZZ$ bL'9T$ 99'02$ s6-E$ L9'E$ 8£'S$ bS'9$ 90'L$ ET£8$ L6'903 b9'bOT$ LL'Z£I$ 88'66$ AelzIaaM 8V0-V1Md Aepmles S-V1Md heplavi 6-V.LAAd hepmaaM £-VINtd Ampam Z-V1Md Aep iaaM T-V1AAd Jad mot4 gad la6uassed alea laSuassed apW anuanaa InoH anuanaa adAlAeO # alms sJaduassed sJabuassed animal! anuanaa Ja6uassed gad Ap}sgns kanocas 'ad 1503 gad as07 Jad POD Jad ApisgnS -tad Ap}sgn5 Jed Appgns sogalej 6urtvado Bugaiado saoleuipuIaDuewaoPad saynoa IIV 9T/STQZ A� S -- AmuaBy;pow" AalleA apaan °led SOnSp EJ dl215 - £ awl uo..Jhar, 6..ui gouagl TABLE 3-A INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS LINE ---r-- ROUTE DESCRIPTION AREAS/SITES SERVICED FIXED ROUTE: Blue Route 1 Provides riders access to many civic locations within the City of Blythe. Blue Route 1 operates deviated service in a clockwise loop type of route providing a 60 minute frequency with one bus five days a week. Blue Route 1 operates from 7:30 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. Destinations on Blue Route 1 include: City Hall, Big K-Mart, Palo Verde Hospital, Employment Development Department, Palo Verde Unified School District, California Highway Patrol, DMV, Albertsons, Rite -Aid, Senior Nutrition Program, etc. Gold Route 2 Provides riders access between the City of Blythe & Palo Verde College and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. Gold Route 2 operates on a two way route providing a 60 minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Gold Route 1 operates from 7:00 am to 6:10 pm Monday through Friday. Destinations on Gold Route 2 include: Blythe City Hall, Big K-Mart, Albertsons, Colorado River Fair, Blythe Recreation Center, Palo Verde Hospital, Palo Verde Valley District Library, Employment Development Department, etc. Red Route 3 Green Route 4 Provides premium commuter service between City of Blythe and the California State Prisons. Red Route 3 serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive then travels via 1-10 to the prisons. This route operates Monday through Friday from 5:00 am to 7:30 am & 2:00 pm to 5:30 pm. Green Route 4 provides deviated fixed route service between Blythe, Ripley and Mesa Verde. This route operates four round trips from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm, Monday through Friday. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive, then travels to the State Prisons, via Interstate 10. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe at two major transfer points. This route will service four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to SR78 then South to Ripley and West to Mesa Verde via 1-10. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe at two major transfer points. Silver Route 5 The Silver Route 5 provides system -wide deviated fixed route service within the City of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. This route serves all major trip generating areas within the system on 90-minute headways. This route will service the City of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona and will operate on Saturdays and in service holidays only. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency Short Range Transit Plan Fiscal Year 2015/16 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2015/16 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number O Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Capital PTMISEA Prop 1 B Homeland Secutily Law Carbon Transit Operations Program Fare Box Other (2) Operating Assistance $ 933,075 $ 352,425 $ 95,725 $ 39,925 Subtotal: Operating $ 988,075 $ 852,425 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 95,725 $ 39,925 Replacement of 2 Gas Fixed Route Buses FY16-1 $ 249,057 $ 249,057 Surveillance Infrastructure Maint. Project FY16-2 $ 18,846 $ 18,846 Pressure Washer/Trailer FY16-3 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Bulk Transit Bus Tires, Filters, etc. FY16-4 $ 15,000 $ 15,oco New Support Vehicle for Replacement FY 16-5 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Operations Facility Solar Project (LCTOP FY 16-6 $ 8,885 $ 8,885 FY14/15) Subtotal: Capital $ 341.788 $ - $ 65,000 $ 249,057 $ 18,846 $ 8,335 ' $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital $ 1,329,863 $ 852,425 $ 65,000 $ 249,057 $ 18,846 $ 8,885 $ 95,725 $ 39,925 (1) Number should lie to Table 4A - Capital Project Justification (2} Please identify source of "Other" funds. Other Funds Include: CNG Fuel Sales T.R.I.P. Revenue RTAP Grant Special Services $ 26,900 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 $ 7,275 Misc. Revenues/Interest $ 250 Advertising $ 1,000 $ 39,925 CO CO Revised 5/12'2015 Summary of FY 2015/16 Funds Requested.xls FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY16-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement of 2 Gas Fixed Route Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and replace two (2) gas fixed route buses, 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency has several buses that have either met their useful life or are very close and need to be replaced in order to continue to provide reliable fixed route service to the community. Therefore PVVTA is looking to purchase and replace two gas (2) buses with seating capacity of 16 passenger/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2015 6/30/2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount PTMISEA Prop 1B FY 2014/15 $249,057 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/15) 34 FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY16-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Surveillance Infrastructure Maintenance Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase supportive surveillance and IT equipment for ongoing longevity of the current PVVTA Surveillance System. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This project would consist of purchasing and updating equipment which would provide the ability to rotate aging equipment to a minimal duty cycle providing greater reliability. Initiating a progressive maintenance program that rotates critical parts of the surveillance and IT infrastructure prolongs the useful life, reliability and overall readiness of the security systems that may be subject to partial failure during the time of emergency if maintenance is not performed and systems are not enhanced. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2015 6/30/2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount Prop 1B HS FY 2014/15 $18,846 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #. FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/15) 35 FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY16-3 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Pressure Washer/Trailer PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase a pressure washer/trailer for mobile cleaning. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PVVTA is looking to purchase a pressure washer mounted on a mobile trailer that can be moved around to locations where it is needed. The pressure washer will be used to clean bus stops and benches around the City, clean the area around the CNG Station, and wash down the buses in the parking lot when needed. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2015 6/30/2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2015/16 $10,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/15) 36 FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A - Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY16-4 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bulk Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase in bulk tires, filters, coolants, etc. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the buses with the supplies already on hand. In addition, it will allow the buses to be put back in service much quicker. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2015 6/30/2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2015/16 $15,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE - INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/15) 37 FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A - Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY16-5 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Support Vehicle PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase one (1) transit support vehicle for replacement. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION PVVTA is currently operating a 2009 support vehicle that has met its useful life and is requiring a significant amount of repairs. The cost of the repairs are not feasible and therefore, PVVTA is looking to replace the 2009 support vehicle. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2015 6/30/2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2015/16 $40,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE - INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/15) 38 FY 2015/16 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY16-6 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Operations Facility Solar Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and installation of solar energy in tandem with an EV Charging Station. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This project would consist of procurement, installation and operation of an integrated solar energy collection system (panels) with infrastructure and public use of an electric vehicle (EV) charging station at the PVVTA Operation Center/Park-N-Ride Lot located at 415 N. Main Street. Installation of a solar panel array would reduce the overall electricity cost by 35% making available an EV station that would provide access to about 50% of the EV traffic within the Palo Verde Valley. With the integration of solar and charging station, ridership may increase by 10% yearly over the life of the project. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2015 6/30/2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REOUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount LCTOP Funds FY 2014/15 $8,885 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/15) 39 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2016/17 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 6.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Capital PTMISEA Prop 1 B Homeland Secutity Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Fare Box Other (2) Operating Assistance FY17 $ 1,021,259 $ 882,260 $ - $ 97,640 $ 41,360 Subtotal- Operating $ 1,021,259 $ 882,260 $ $ $ $ - $ 97.640 $ 41,360 Bus Stop Amenities FY 17-1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Bulk Vehicle Tires/Filters FY 17-2 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Trolley Rehabilitation Project FY 17-3 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Subtotal: Capital $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital 1 $ 1,146,259 t $ 882,260 $ 125,000 t $ - $ - $ - $ 97,640 $ 41,360 (1) Number should tie to Table 5.1 A- Capital Project Justification (2) Please identify source of "Other" funds. Other Funds Include: CNG Fuel Sales T.R.I.P. Revenue RTAP Grant Special Services Misc. Revenues/Interest Advertising O $ 27,842 $ 2,070 $ 2,500 $ 7,639 $ 260 $ 1,050 $ 41,360 Revised 5/12/2015 Summary of Funds Requested FY 2016/17.xls FY 2016/17 SRTP Table 5.1A — Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: 17-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bus Stop Amenities PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Continue to purchase bus shelters and or benches to be placed at bus stops where needed throughout the Palo Verde Valley. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Agency would like to continue with the placement of bus shelters and benches at our bus stop locations. These amenities will provide passenger comfort while waiting for the transit bus. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2016 6/30/2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2016/17 $10,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/16) 41 FY 2016/17 SRTP Table 5.1 A - Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: 17-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bulk Vehicle Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase in bulk tires, filters, coolants, etc PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the buses with the supplies already on hand. Plus it will allow the buses to be put back in service much quicker. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2016 6/30/2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2016/17 $15,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE - INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/16) 42 FY 2016/17 SRTP Table 5.1A - Capital ProWet Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: 17-3 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Trolley Rehabilitation Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Rehabilitate PVVTA's 2003 Trolley. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The trolley is a contingency vehicle and only used for special requests and at Christmas time for the parade and for the Holiday Runner. The Agency would like to rehabilitate the trolley in order to continue to operate it for these events. Plus it would be a more reliable back up bus when needed. The cost of rehabilitating the trolley is far more feasible than purchasing a new one. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2016 6/30/2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2016/17 $100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE - INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #. FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #1 FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/16) 43 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2017/18 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 Project Description Capital Project Number to Total Amount of Funds LT STA Prop 1 B Capital PTMISEA Prop 1 B Homeland Secutity Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Fare Box Other (2) Operating Assistance FY18 $ 1,0561205 $ 913,750 $ $ $ $ $ 99,593 $ 42,852 Subtotal: Operating $ 1,056,205 $ 913,760 $ - $ - $ $ $ 99,593 $ 42,852 Bulk Transit Bus Tires, Filters, etc. FY 18-1 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 New CNG Bus Replacement (1) FY 18-2 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Subtotal: Capital $ 165,000 $ - $ 165.000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital 1 , $ 1,221,205 $ 913,760 $ 165,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 99,593 1$ 42,852 (1) Number should tie 10 Table 5.1 A - Capital Project Justification (2) Please Identify source of "Other" funds, Other Funds Include: CNG Fuel Sales T.R.I.P. Revenue RTAP Grant Special Services Misc. Revenues/Interest Advertising $ 28,816 $ 2,142 $ 2,500 $ 8,021 $ 270 $ 1,103 $ 42,852 Revised 5/12/2015 Summary of Funds Requested FY 2017/18.xls FY 2017/18 SRTP Table 5.2A - Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: 18-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bulk Vehicle Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase in bulk tires, filters, coolants, etc PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the buses with the supplies already on hand. Plus it will allow the buses to be put back in service much quicker. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2017 6/30/2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2017/18 $15,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE - INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) 45 FY 2017/18 SRTP Table 5.2A — Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY18-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: New CNG Bus Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and replace one (1) CNG fixed route bus with seating capacity of 26 passengers/1 wheelchair. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Pato Verde Valley Transit Agency has a couple of CNG buses that will be meeting their useful life or will be very close and will need to be replaced in order to continue to provide reliable fixed route service to the community. Therefore PVVTA will be requesting funds to purchase and replace one (1) CNG bus with seating capacity of 26 passengers/1 wheelchair. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2017 6/30/2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2017/18 $150,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) 46 TABLE 6—PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Prior Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2010 — FY 2012) Action(s) Taken And Results (1) Exempt both Fare Revenue and Operating Cost from New Services in the Fiscal Audit. Staff is now aware that Fare Revenue must also be exempted from new services in the Fiscal Audit. This recommendation was applied to the FY 2012/13 Audit and will be applied in the future when there are exempt routes. Develop a Succession Plan for the Finance Manager position. The Board approved a revision to the Joint Powers Authority to assign the financial duties through the General Manager as seen fit and necessary. Include Year -to -Date and Prior Year -to -Date Performance Data in the Quarterly Operations Data Report. Staff has revised the Quarterly Operations Report to include Year -to -Date and Prior Year - to -Date Performance Data. (1) If no action taken, provide schedule for implementation or explanation of why the recommendation is no longer relevant. 47 li�tride Luau 1ngsvaldim iansi=rr Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan Review Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency Data Elements FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 46,043 Passenger Miles 644,602 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 9,230.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 180,755.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 222,519.0 Total Operating Expenses $937,289 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $104,830 Net Operating Expenses $832,459 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 11.18% I >= 10.00% I 15.73% I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $101.55 <= $99.18 $101.47 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $18.08 >= $14.37 and <= $19.44 $14.32 Better Than Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $1.29 >= $1.03 and <_ $1.39 $1.02 Better Than Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $90.19 >= $73.75 and <= $99.77 $85.51 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.61 >- $3.66 and <= $4.95 $4.37 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 5.00 >= 4.34 and <- 5.87 6.00 Better Than Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.25 >-- 0.21 and <= 0.29 0.31 Better Than Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: A CO TransTrack Manager"' 4(16/2015 Page 1 of 1 1• MEI - rarvle tuprk, 1erNIclial Canaim n FY 2015/16 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2013/14 End of Year Actual FY 2014J15 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2015/16 Plan FY 2015/16 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) I Passengers 44,432 39,427 50,004 None Passenger Miles 622,048 551,978 700,056 None Revenue Hours 8,817,0 6,604,0 8,828.0 None Total Hours 10,944.0 8,186.0 10,951.0 None Revenue Miles 176,421.0 129,254.0 172,767.0 None Total Miles 223,061.0 159,778.0 213,034.0 None Operating Costs $469,112 $670,109 $988,075 None Passenger Revenue $64,116 $105,398 $135,650 None Operating Subsidy $404,996 $564,710 $852,425 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $53.21 $101.47 $111.93 <_ $99.18 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $2.66 $5.18 $5.72 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $10.56 $17.00 $19.76 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 13.67% 15.73% 13.72n/0 >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $9,12 $14.32 $17.05 >_ $14.37 and <_ $19.44 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.65 $1.02 $1.22 >_ $1.03 and <_ $1.39 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $45,93 $85.51 $96.56 >_ $73.75 and <_ $99.77 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $2.30 $4.37 $4.93 >_ $3.66 and <_ $4.95 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 5.00 6.00 5.70 >= 4.34 and <= 5.87 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.25 0.31 0.29 >= 0.21 and <= 0.29 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2015/16 Plan to the FY 2015/16 Primary Target. CD TransTrack Manager"" 4/16/2015 Page 1 of I TABLE 9 — HIGHLIGHTS OF SRTP PRESENTATION ■ An RFP was released in FY 2014/15 for transportation services. The new contract was awarded to Transportation Concepts and took effect October 1, 2014. The new contract will be effective through June 30, 2017, with an option to extend the agreement five (5) additional one year periods. ■ PVVTA will maintain current fare structure for services provided for FY 2015/16 and will only look at implementing an increase should meeting the farebox be in jeopardy. ■ PVVTA's CNG Station has been in operation for a year now and the demand for CNG fuel has increased tremendously during that period of time, that PVVTA will be looking to expand the CNG Station in the near future. ■ PVVTA Blue Route 1 will continue to run the existing route with minor changes in routing. ■ PVVTA Gold Route 2 will add tripper service along Chanslorway twice daily. ■ PVVTA Red Route 3 will continue to run the existing route with a reduction of one AM trip. ■ PVVTA Green Route 4 will add a PM trip outbound at 6pm. ■ PVVTA Silver Route 5 will reduce route service to four (4) hours total daily. ■ PVVTA will continue to operate XTend-A-Ride service which is a demand responsive service that addresses special areas in time where community require general public transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system. ■ The Agency will continue to place passenger amenities (e.g. benches, shelters) at strategic locations that promote new ridership through target marketing and partnerships. ■ Agency management will continue to focus on system productivity, mindful of TDA and RCTC Performance Improvement Plan requirements relative to the Farebox Recovery Ratio. Operating and Financial Data FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Projected FY15-16 Planned System -wide Ridership 41,945 41,745 44,432 46,043 50,004 Cost Per Revenue Hour $48.18 $50.33 $53.21 $101.47 111.93 Productivity Performance Summary: The proposed PVVTA FY15/16 SRTP, meets one of one mandatory indicator and meets 6 of 7 discretionary indicators. 50 Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2013/14 Audit FY 14/15 (Estimate) FY 15/16 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 83,485 91,080 97,725 2.Interest 18 50 50 3. General Fund Supplement - - 4. Measure A - 5. Advertising Revenue 1,000 1,500 1,000 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets - 7. CNG Revenue 2,918 - 26,900 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - - 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - 10. Investment Income - - 11. CalPers CERBT - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes (39,267) - 13. Other Revenues 16,012 12,200 9,975 TOTAL REVENUE 64,166 104,830 135,650 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 469,112 937,289 988,075 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 13.68% 11.18% 13.73% 51 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW 5 1.1 JURISDICTION 5 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS 6 Population Profile — Rider Characteristics 6 Demographic Projections 7 1.3 FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES 9 Fixed Route Services 9 Frequent Key Corridor 9 Supporting Local 10 Regional Connectors 10 Community Feeders 10 CommuterLink 10 Paratransit Services 10 1.4 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE 11 Cooperative Fare and Subsidy Programs 12 1.5 REVENUE FLEET 13 1.6 EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES 14 Operational Facilities 14 Facility Modernization 14 1.7 Existing Coordination Between Transit Agencies 15 Regional Coordination 16 Interregional Coordination & Transfer Agreements 16 CHAPTER 2: ROUTE PERFORMANCE & EXISTING SERVICE 18 2.1 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 18 Service Standards and Warrants 18 Productivity vs. Coverage Target 19 Warrants for New Service 20 Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) 20 2.2 EXISTING FIXED ROUTE & DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE 20 2.3 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS 20 2.4 TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROWTH MARKETS 21 2.5 TRANSIT CENTERS, EQUIPMENT AND PASSENGER AMENITIES 21 Passenger Transit Facilities 22 Equipment and Passenger Amenities 26 CHAPTER 3: RECENT AND PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 29 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES 29 3.2 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 29 3.3 MODIFICATIONS TO PARATRANSIT SERVICE 31 3.4 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION 32 3.5 BUDGET IMPACT ON PROPOSED CHANGES 33 CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL & CAPITAL PLANS 35 i Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 4.1 OPERATING & CAPITAL BUDGET 35 4.2 FUNDING SOURCES FOR OPERATING & CAPITAL PROGRAMS 38 4.3 REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS 39 ii Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency Tables: Comparative Table 1 Table 2 Table 2A Table 3 Table 3A Table 4 Table 4A Table 5.1 Table 5.1A Table 5.2 Table 5.2A Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9A Table 98 Statistics Fleet Inventory a. Motor Bus: Directly Operated Fixed Routes b. Commuter Bus: Directly Operated c. Motor Bus: Purchased Transportation d. Demand Response: Purchased Transportation SRTP Service Summary a. Routes: All Routes (System -wide Totals) b. Routes: Non -Excluded Routes c. Routes: Excluded Routes d. Program: Directly Operated Fixed Routes e. Program: Contracted Fixed Routes f. Program: Dial -A -Ride g. Program: Taxi Excluded Routes for FY15/16 SRTP Route Statistics Individual Route Descriptions Summary of Funds Requested for FY15/16 Capital Project Justification for FY15/16 Summary of Funds Requested in FY16/17 Capital Project Justification for FY16/17 Summary of Funds Requested in FY17/18 Capital Project Justification for FY17/18 FY13 State Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations Service Provider Performance Target Report FY15/16 SRTP Performance Report Highlights of SRTP Fare Revenue Calculation Appendix A: RTA System Map and Fixed Route Maps iii Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS 5304 Federal funds for statewide transportation planning 5307 Federal funds in urban areas (formula) 5309 Federal funds for capital investments (competitive) 5310 Federal funds for enhanced mobility 5311 Federal funds in non -urbanized (rural) areas (formula) 5316 Federal funds for the Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 5317 Federal funds for the New Freedom Program 5339 Federal funds for the Bus and Bus Facilities Program ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ATIS Advanced Traveler Information System BRT Bus Rapid Transit CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program CNG Compressed Natural Gas COA Comprehensive Operational Analysis CTSA Consolidated Transportation Services Agency DAR Dial -A -Ride paratransit services DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise EEO Equal Employment Opportunity FTA Federal Transit Administration FY Fiscal Year GASB Government Accounting Standards Board HSR California High -Speed Rail ITS Intelligent Transportation System JARC Job Access and Reverse Commute, also known as FTA Section 5316 LTF Local Transportation Fund LCTOP Low Carbon Transit Operations Program MSJC Mount San Jacinto College MJPA March Joint Powers Authority MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization NF New Freedom Program, also known as FTA Section 5317 OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OPEB ARC Other Post Employment Benefits — Annual Required Contribution PEPRA Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2012 PIP Productivity Improvement Program PVL Perris Valley Line RCC Riverside City College RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTPA Regional Transportation Planning Agency SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SGR State of Good Repair SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance TDA Transportation Development Act T-NOW Transportation NOW TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee UCR University of California, Riverside UPASS University Pass UZA Urbanized Area as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau iv Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 WRCOG Western Riverside Council of Governments V Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP), updated annually, covers fiscal years 2016 to 2018. The plan provides a description of Riverside Transit Agency's (RTA) services, regional transit needs and a look ahead at RTA's proposed service plans and capital projects. The plan will ultimately require approval by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) as mandated by California Public Utilities Code (CPUC) §130303. Approval by RCTC allows the plan's operating and capital projects to be programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). Approval also supports RTA's claim for Local Transportation Funds (LTF), State Transit Assistance Funds (STA), County Measure A funds and the submittal of grants to the Federal Transit Administration under 49 U.S.C. § 5304, 5307, 5310, 5311, 5339 and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program. Furthermore, RCTC administers Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds and with the approval of the SRTP, will issue allocation and disbursement instructions for Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transportation Assistance funds (STA) to the County Auditor/Controller. RCTC also administers County Measure A funds and will process payments to RTA consistent with the SRTP. Lastly, the SRTP allows RTA to develop business strategies and funding mechanisms to bring to fruition planned services, programs and capital improvement projects that fall beyond the lifespan of the SRTP and are included in RTA's Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, which is designed to meet the future transit needs of western Riverside County. For nearly 40 years, RTA and the region's transit network have evolved from a suburban transit system to a complex multimodal network of high -demand timed connections between buses, trains, paratransit services and non -motorized modes of transit. The demand for public transportation for high school and college students has also increased. With record -breaking ridership over the past few years, RTA is challenged with expanding services to emerging new communities and neighborhoods, and maintaining on -time performance as running times grow longer and less predictable due to increasing congestion, major road construction projects and area growth. Being proactive and adaptable to change will ensure RTA's ability to meet future mobility needs. In an effort to plan for those future mobility needs, RTA recently conducted a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) study. The study reviewed RTA's entire transit network structure and performance to provide a comprehensive understanding of market conditions and service expectations. The findings led to the development of a phased set of service recommendations designed to build upon the market opportunities and performance strengths, ridership growth, and improve both overall passenger experience and financial sustainability. The recommendations were based on analysis of existing and future market conditions, service performance, and feedback from RTA Board Members, passengers and key stakeholders. The 1 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency end product of the COA, the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, was approved by the Board of Directors in January 2015 and was used as a guide in preparing the SRTP. The primary recommendations of the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan are to streamline routes, improve frequencies, enhance connections, improve bus stop amenities, and adhere to bus stop spacing and service design standards to enhance RTA's future services. Furthermore, the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan recommends enhanced service on popular routes to increase ridership and generate more fare revenue. The plan also recommends maintaining appropriate transit service in lower potential ridership areas. The recommendations are designed to create a transit system that remains attractive to existing and potential new riders while maintaining the delicate balance between efficiency and effectiveness. Within this framework, the SRTP lays out a program of projects to accomplish the goals established in the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan. The first round of recommendations from the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan was implemented in January 2015 and focused on improvements to the frequency, span and connectivity of the highest -performing services. Moving forward, service plans for the next three years and beyond will continue to be shaped by the transit plan's proposed strategies and recommendations. The proposals for FY16 focus on implementing bus service to the new Metrolink Perris Valley Line (PVL), which is due to begin operation between Riverside and South Perris in December 2015. Other proposals for FY16 include frequency and connectivity improvements, the streamlining of routes, addressing capacity constraints and expanding RTA's span of service. Specifically, several service recommendations are proposed to the southern portion of the RTA service area (Lake Elsinore, Wildomar, Murrieta and Temecula) to improve service frequencies, spans and connectivity. Lastly, in an effort to provide service to those who live in rural areas that have no access to public transportation, RTA proposes a new project, Dial -a -Ride Plus, Riverside Transit Agency Lifeline Service. The two-year pilot project would provide wheelchair accessible taxi service to seniors 65 and over and to persons with disabilities for lifeline services such as doctor's appointments, dialysis and chemotherapy treatments, trips to the pharmacy, to the grocery store for food, or to the senior center to access hot meal service. The development of transit support infrastructure (bus stops, transfer hubs, and operations/maintenance facilities) is essential to the safe, comfortable and efficient operation of transit services. In partnership with the City of Temecula and the Promenade Mall, staff completed conceptual plans to expand the bus stop at the mall to support the planned expansion of service and to improve passenger safety. Architectural and engineering work will be completed in 2015 and construction is slated to start in early 2016 and be completed before September 2016. Similarly, in partnership with University of California at Riverside (UCR), a conceptual plan is being developed to build an on -campus transit hub at the gateway to the campus. This improvement will enhance safety and is essential to support the operation of RapidLink Route 1 and other service enhancements. Furthermore, staff will initiate the 2 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency architectural and engineering work for elevating the bus stop at Mt. San Jacinto College in San Jacinto to a transit hub to accommodate timed transfers and expansion of service. The construction schedule will be based on the design of the facility. With the completion of the Bus Stops Strategic Policy in June 2015, RTA will launch an improvement initiative that will span the next three years. Based on the implementation plan, bus stops will be improved throughout the service area with upgraded accessibility, amenities and enhanced safety. Lastly, RTA staff is prepared to develop a facilities master plan. During the first phase of this undertaking, staff will assess future operating, maintenance and support infrastructure needs to accommodate expansion services as well as emerging vehicle and energy/fuel technologies and strategies. Following this assessment, staff will develop a comprehensive facilities master plan to advance RTA beyond the current 10-year (2025) planning horizon. At capacity already, RTA is able to operate in the short-term with existing operating and maintenance facilities. Without a comprehensive facilities master plan, RTA will be unable to efficiently implement service improvements, make major investments in new technologies and support infrastructure, and aggressively compete for discretionary grant funding sources. A 4.9 percent systemwide ridership growth is projected in FY16 from FY15, partly in response to RTA's ongoing improvements and despite lower gas prices and declining ridership in neighboring jurisdictions. In FY17, the RapidLink Route 1 Limited Stop service and the Downtown Riverside Operating Plan is scheduled to go into effect. RapidLink Route 1 will provide service between UCR and Corona primarily along University and Market/Magnolia avenues. The construction work for both projects is slated to begin early 2016 and be completed by fall 2016. RapidLink Route 16 service between UCR and Perris Metrolink Station though Moreno Valley is also a part of this effort. Although funding for construction and operation of the RapidLink Route 16 has not yet been identified, advanced planning and development of support infrastructure will be crucial for its success. Finally, additional express bus service will be implemented on State Route (SR) 91 from Riverside and Temecula/Lake Elsinore to Orange County as a condition of the funding arrangement related to SR-91 improvements. In FY18, the Agency will focus on fine tuning the PVL feeder bus service, RapidLink Route 1, SR- 91 express service and COA initiatives introduced during the previous two years. There will also be a review of other emerging needs and opportunities for further COA initiatives to be implemented within the expected fiscal conditions for the coming years. Total RTA revenues for FY16 are budgeted at $96.1 million which includes $69.1 million in operating expenses and $27.0 million for capital improvements. The Operating Budget increase of $2.1 million, or 3.1 percent over FY15, is due to service expansion; established rates for 3 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency purchased transportation; headcount growth; strategic studies; and increased insurance costs. The Capital Budget is decreasing $13.4 million, or 33 percent, from FY15 due to the FY15 re -programming, or roll forward, of Federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) and Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds for the purchase of expansion heavy-duty CNG buses. 4 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 JURISDICTION RTA's jurisdiction is among the largest in the nation for a transit system, encompassing approximately 2,500 square miles of western Riverside County. Included in the boundaries are eighteen (18) incorporated cities including Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula and Wildomar and unincorporated areas of Riverside County Supervisorial Districts 1, 2, 3 & 5. Unlike other agencies of similar size, RTA is unique in that it provides service in both urban and rural areas. Urbanized and rural areas are defined by the United States Census Bureau (US Census), based on population size, and revised every 10 years. The urbanized areas (UZA) in the jurisdiction are Riverside -San Bernardino, Hemet, and Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee. Portions of RTA routes also connect to Los Angeles -Long Beach - Anaheim and San Diego UZAs, providing interregional mobility options to RTA customers. Based on data from the 2010 US Census, over 90 percent of RTA's services are located in urbanized areas. The map below illustrates RTA's jurisdictional boundaries and highlights the portions of the region considered urbanized. 5 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency 'lna '.9cr1[tlaf ,alley Pomona Ontario a but "' Clung land Bar Chino Hills 83 Los Serrar,s hd Lllit lacennd ill0 Palk tge North Tustin na Tustin 26' rvine — 1.Glen Avon Rubidoux Eastvale Jurupa Valley Riverside Corona 133 Foothill Ranch Rancho Santa Ldke FOfest Margarita Mission Viejo Laguna Hills 2d1 Laguna Niguel Laguna Beach San Juan Capistrano Dana Poitit San Clemente Horne Gardens Woodiresl Luke El Cerrito la thews C• Sarmagt Peak ReulamL ma Linda_ Moreno Valley -•pa Calirresa lake Perris State Recreation A.ea Lakeview Nuevo Perris Sun City Lake Elsinore Canyon Lake _d N tal Forest •/` h Wildomar N v Murrieta a n Te Homeland Morongo I.R Beaumont —Banning fabazon' sal Mt :. San Jacinto Sohoh,, LR Hemet Valle Vista Idyll, East Hemet Winchester Diu rnond Valley La!e �e 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS RTA is challenged by the changing demographics in various communities and continues to be proactive by planning routes that are customer -oriented, viable, efficient and cost-effective. By studying the characteristics of riders, a better understanding is gained to more appropriately plan for and meet the needs of the transit market. Rider characteristics, along with demographic and population changes, are used to shape and strategize how resources will be allocated in future years. Population Profile — Rider Characteristics Bus passenger characteristics were collected from on -board surveys conducted in spring 2013 as part of the COA study. A demographic summary of weekday RTA riders offered the following characteristics: 6 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency SUMMARY OF RIDER CHARACTERISTICS1 Average Age (Years) Bus Fare Categories General Passes Disabled/ Senior Youth Medicare 5 33 Employed Yes 7% No 22% 15% 5% 1% Average Travel Time (Minutes) 52 70% 30% Primary Language English Spanish Other 95% 5% <1% How Long Using RTA Services First Time Less Than 6 Months 6 Months-2 Years 2 Years-5 Years More Than 5 Years 5% 16% 29% 22% 28% Median Household Income Under $7,500 $7,500-$14,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 Over $75,000 28% 19% 16% 12% 10% 8% 6% Automobile Ownership Yes No 67% 33% Gender Female Male 52% 48% Highest Level Of Education Less Than High School High School Diploma Some College Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Some Graduate School Graduate Degree 16% 28% 34% 8°% 6% 3% 4% Veteran Yes No 4% 96% Frequency Of Using RTA Buses First Time Less Than Once A Month Less Than Once A Week 1-2 Days Per Week 3-4 Days Per Week 5 Days Per Week 6-7 Days Per Week 3% 4% 4% 14% 25% 26% 23% Customer Destinations School Work Shopping/Errands Social/Recreational Other Medical/Social Services 37% 27% 11% 10% 9% 6% Ethnicity Latino/Hispanic White/Caucasian Black/African American Mixed Asian/Pacific Islander Other American Indian 37% 22% 20% 10% 5% 3% 2% Source: RTA COA Study (2013-2014) Demographic Projections Demographic projections directly correlate to the allocation of future transit services. Demographic data such as population, employment, urban density, income levels, age distributions and development patterns are the primary variables that shape public transit in a community. Growth projections for the region are compiled by SCAG, the County of Riverside, and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) in collaboration with local jurisdictions. At the local level, jurisdictions have the ability to plan and revise land use and transportation characteristics to target a desired level of intensity for employment, housing and commercial areas. On a regional scale, population and employment density in the RTA service area is generally focused into centers, concentrated hubs of residents and jobs. The region's most populated area spans from Corona, Riverside and Moreno Valley, which encompasses more than one-third of the two million residents and 750,000 jobs in Western Riverside County3. Communities such as these have more diverse land uses, making public transit a more viable option for travel. The majority of the jurisdictions in Western Riverside County, however, consist of lower density, 1 Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. 2 Go -Pass, U-Pass, and City Pass. 3 SCAG RTP 2012-2035 Growth Forecast. 7 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency single types of land uses. Communities outside of the larger network centers are primarily suburban -residential. Employment -to -population ratios are lower in communities with a high concentration of single family residential units, requiring residents to rely heavily on private automobiles to complete daily trips. A market assessment, including a demographic analysis was conducted with the COA and identified the following trends: • By 2035, the population in Western Riverside County is projected to reach 2.7 million people, an increase of 28 percent from the 2020 projected baseline. The highest rates of growth are expected to occur in areas that are currently suburban developments, though a comparable volume of growth will occur in the more densely populated, transit -supportive, urban communities. • Employment in the RTA service area is expected to grow by 34 percent compared to the 2020 projected baseline. The 250,000 new jobs will bring the 2035 employment total to over one million. Similar to population, the rate of employment growth will be highest in the suburban markets. • The Northwest sub -area (Corona, Eastvale, Home Gardens, Jurupa Valley, Norco and Riverside) has the highest concentrations of population and employment in the RTA service area. However, outside of a few communities, future changes in density within the sub -area will remain moderate. Downtown Riverside is projected as an area of concentrated growth that can foster more opportunities for transit. The suburban communities in the city of Eastvale and along the Bellegrave Avenue corridor will be sites of larger population growth while employment increases are projected in Corona and Norco along Hamner Avenue. The core of the sub -area will still be downtown Riverside and the Magnolia Avenue -University Avenue corridor. Other residential communities in the northern portion of the sub -area will remain automobile -oriented communities because of the lack of mixed -used density. • In the Moreno Valley/Perris sub -area (Mead Valley, March Air Reserve Base, Moreno Valley and Perris), growth will primarily occur outside of the existing core and in the outlying communities. Moreno Beach Drive and the areas south of the Lake Perris Reservoir will experience significant growth in population density. Most of the new employment is concentrated near the Riverside County Regional Medical Center. Serving the new residential areas would present a challenge for effective transit due to their distance from major corridors. Residential development will still be the dominant land use in the sub -area. Moreno Valley will remain a dense, residential community. Most of the population and employment density in Perris will remain focused around Perris Boulevard. • The Hemet/San Jacinto/Pass sub -area (Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Hemet and San Jacinto) is expected to undergo the highest rates of growth in the system. The increases are concentrated in the Beaumont and San Jacinto jurisdictions. The majority of the population growth in Beaumont will take place in the rural and suburban areas between Pennsylvania Avenue and Highland Springs Avenue. In San Jacinto, residential density 8 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency will increase east of the State Street corridor. The sub -area employment growth is minimal and limited to a few key corridors, specifically along Sixth Street/Ramsey Street, Florida Avenue and State Street. Hemet will maintain transit -supportive densities and land uses in 2035. The Florida Avenue corridor is positioned to be the key corridor in the sub -area due to high levels of employment density. Although the rate of overall growth in the sub -area is significant, the future success of transit will largely depend on how the new development patterns interact with the existing ones to promote sustainable growth. • In the Southwest sub -area (Canyon Lake, French Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Murrieta, Temecula, Wildomar and Winchester), the key change will be the large concentration of employment growth in Murrieta along the 1-15 and 1-215 freeways. The change in density is particularly intense east of the 1-15 and will occur on currently undeveloped parcels. The only significant changes in population density occur in Winchester and Lake Elsinore, areas outside of the sub -area core. By 2035, Temecula and Murrieta are projected to have the highest density in the sub -area. More trip generators should be expected where higher population and employment densities are proposed. 1.3 FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES As of July 1, 2015, RTA will operate 35 regional, local, rural and trolley service routes and eight (8) CommuterLink express routes. Two additional local routes are expected to be added to provide connectivity with the Perris Valley Rail Line, which is due to commence operations in December 2015. Routes in higher density urban areas with greater peak ridership are usually operated with larger vehicles, while routes in suburban and rural areas with lower ridership are usually operated with smaller- to medium-sized vehicles. Refer to Table 3A for a complete listing of both directly operated and contract operated routes. Fixed Route Services The service recommendations of the recently completed COA classified all RTA fixed -route services under five service tiers. Each tier serves a different role in the network and has different expectations for service performance and frequencies. Frequent Key Corridor Frequent key corridor routes form the core spine of the network and provide "lifestyle" transit options for riders. They have the highest ridership and performance in the system and the highest service frequencies (30 minute or better) to accommodate this high ridership. These routes have the potential to support Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) services in the future. The corridors identified in this tier are RapidLink Route 1 between UCR and Corona primarily along 9 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency University and Market/Magnolia avenues and RapidLink Route 16 between UCR and Perris Metrolink Station though Moreno Valley/Perris Boulevard. Supporting Local Supporting local routes constitute the majority of the route network, providing connections to key employment centers, activity centers, and transfer hubs. They offer "lifeline" service for those dependent on transit while also providing connections to lifestyle services. Frequencies will vary depending on the market support for transit, but will be at least hourly. Regional Connectors Regional connectors are longer distance routes that connect multiple urban centers separated by geographic gaps in density. These routes tend to have lower performance due to their longer distances and lower densities in the areas between the urban centers they connect. Frequencies are generally hourly. As their name suggests, these routes provide network connectivity between dispersed activity centers and between high- and low -density areas across the RTA service area. Community Feeders Community feeders are shorter distance routes (including special trolley services) that connect key destinations within a community. They connect residents with local shopping centers, educational facilities, medical facilities or transit stations. CommuterLink CommuterLink routes are long-distance, peak -hour express services that provide both inter - and intra-county connections. They connect commuters directly with major employment centers or indirectly through connections at major multi -modal bus and rail hubs. Paratransit Services RTA offers demand response paratransit services known as "Dial -A -Ride" (DAR) to seniors (age 65 and above) and persons with disabilities. DAR is an origin -to -destination advanced reservation transportation service that travels to areas within three-quarters of a mile of an RTA fixed route, excluding express services. These areas are referred to as the "Dial -A -Ride service area" and trips must begin and end in the service area. If the trip starts or ends outside the service area, passengers must find a safe place within the service area to be picked up and dropped off to be eligible for service. DAR service is provided at times equivalent to local fixed route bus service in the area. RTA has two types of DAR service: 10 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Priority DAR Service RTA gives priority service to individuals who are certified under ADA law. Persons who are ADA certified are eligible for trips throughout the RTA service area that are within three-quarters of a mile of a fixed route bus service, excluding express routes, and during the hours of fixed route bus service operation. Senior/Disabled DAR Service Seniors age 65 and above and persons with disabilities are eligible for local DAR service within a single city and within three-quarters of a mile during the hours of fixed route bus service operation, excluding express service. Transportation is provided only within the city in which the trip begins. In an effort to provide service to those who live in more rural areas that have no access to public transportation, this year RTA proposed a new project, Dial -a -Ride Plus, Riverside Transit Agency Lifeline Service. The proposed project, a two-year pilot program approved under the RCTC Measure A Call for Projects, would extend the DAR service boundary by an additional two miles. Primary funding for the two-year period would be Local Transit Funds (LTF), but 10 percent would be provided from Measure A to ensure the program is farebox compliant. The program would provide wheelchair accessible taxi service to seniors aged 65 and over and to persons with disabilities for lifeline services such as doctor's appointments, dialysis and chemotherapy treatments, trips to the pharmacy, to the grocery store for food, or to the senior center to access hot meal service. If approved, the program would begin providing trips July 1, 2015, and would continue beyond the two-year pilot only if revenues generated by passenger fares achieve farebox compliance without the use of Measure A funds by the end of the pilot period. If successful, additional funding would be sought from Federal 5310 program funds. 1.4 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE The most recent change to the fare structure was in July 2013, when the Board of Directors approved a revision to include the addition of discounted fares for veterans and active duty military, police and fire personnel as shown in the table below. Other fare categories were established in June 2009 after the last fare study which was completed in March 2009. A review of the current fare structure is anticipated over the next two years. 11 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 - FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency FIXED ROUTE FARES Fare Categories General Youth (grades 1-12)** Senior/Disabled** Medicare Card Holder Veteran** Child (46" tall or under) Base Fares Day Pass* $1.50 $4.00 $1.50 $4.00 $0.70 $2.00 $0.70 $2.00 $0.70 $2.00 $0.25 N/A 7-Day Pass* 30-Day Pass* $16.00 $50.00 $16.00 $35.00 $16.00 $23.00 $16.00 $23.00 $16.00 $23.00 N/A N/A COMMUTERLINK FARES COMMUTERLINK + LOCAL Fare Categories General Youth (grades 1 -12)** Senior/Disabled** Medicare Card Holder Veteran** Child (46" tall or under) Base Fares Day Pass $3.00 $7.00 $3.00 $7.00 $2.00 $5.00 $2.00 $5.00 $2.00 $5.00 $2.00 N/A 30-Day Pass $75.00 $75.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 N/A DIAL -A -RIDE FARES I Not accepted on fixed route buses Fare Categories Senior/Disabled Medicare Card Holder Child (46" tall or under) Base Fares $3.00 $3.00 $0.50 10-Ticket Books $30.00 $30.00 N/A *Accepted as base fare. CommuterLink trips require an additional $1.30 (Senior/Disabled/Medicare/Veteran) or $1.50 (General/Youth) per trip. **Proper identification is required at time of boarding. In addition to these fare categories, RTA also has U-Pass, Go -Pass, and CityPass programs. Cardholders of these programs get unlimited rides on any fixed route, including CommuterLink, in the RTA network at no cost. Active duty military, police and fire personnel in uniform with valid identification are also eligible for complimentary rides on RTA fixed routes. Cooperative Fare and Subsidy Programs RTA makes every effort to create partnerships that will improve service for customers by developing fare programs that promote the use of public transit. In FY16, the following cooperative fare and subsidy programs will continue: ■ California Baptist University - U-Pass Program ■ City of Riverside - CityPass for Employees ■ City of Temecula - Route 55 Temecula Trolley ■ County of Riverside - Route 50Jury Trolley ■ La Sierra University - U-Pass Program 12 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency ■ Moreno Valley College — Go -Pass Program ■ Mount San Jacinto College - Go -Pass Program ■ Riverside City College - Go -Pass Program ■ University of California, Riverside (UCR) - U-Pass Program, Route 51 Crest Cruiser College and university programs allow students with a valid identification card from these campuses to receive unlimited access to any of RTA's fixed routes. These programs are funded by the institution or students. The City of Riverside subsidizes the CityPass fare program for its employees to ride the bus for free and serves as a pass outlet (Riverside Go Transit) for its residents by discounting 20 percent to 30 percent off on 7-day and 30-day passes, respectively. Other subsidized transit services include the trolley and circulator routes which are funded by UCR or local jurisdictions. 1.5 REVENUE FLEET As of March 2015, RTA has a total active fixed route fleet size of 189 buses. The bus types consist of 110 CNG-powered 40-ft. buses currently used for directly operated fixed routes and 79 medium-sized buses for contracted fixed routes which include nine (9) Type II, (60) Type VII vehicles, and ten (10) trolleys. RTA also has an additional 98 vehicles for operation of paratransit services, for a total of 287 revenue service vehicles. Refer to Table 1 for a detailed inventory of the RTA fleet. The CNG heavy duty buses used on directly operated routes generally cover more densely populated areas such as Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley, and Perris while the medium-sized buses are typically used as local and express vehicles on contract operated fixed routes in less dense communities. In FY16, with the expansion of service for bus connectivity with the Perris Valley Rail Line and implementation of some COA-recommended improvements, and the transfer of Corona — Eastvale Route 3 from contracted operation (weekdays only), the directly operated fixed route fleet peak demand will grow by eight buses (total fleet would add two additional buses to meet spare ratio). These needs will be met by the contingency fleet of NA61 buses until the delivery of 14 new buses in the first quarter of calendar year 2016. The contract operated peak requirement is anticipated to grow by four medium buses (total fleet would add an additional bus to meet spare ratio) as a result of the addition of buses for PVL and other service expansion, and the transfer of Route 3 to direct operation. This need will be met by a contingency fleet of medium buses retained after the delivery of 36 new replacement medium buses. A further batch of new medium buses is expected to be delivered by the end of FY16, allowing the replacement of the contingency fleet. 13 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency 1.6 EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES Operational Facilities RTA's primary facility is located in the City of Riverside and houses the Administration, Operations, and Maintenance departments with approximately 329 active employees on site. RTA's secondary facility, located in Hemet, opened in June 2000. It now has approximately 88 Administration, Operations, and Maintenance employees assigned to the division. The Hemet facility houses our Customer Information Center, is utilized for routes in the southern portion of the service area and maintains a portion of the CNG vehicle fleet. In FY16, RTA's contracted fixed route service will continue to be provided by Empire Transportation, who operates from a facility in Perris. DAR service is currently provided by TransDev (formerly Veolia Transit) and is also based out of Perris. Both contractors are responsible for housing, operating, and maintaining RTA vehicles. The DAR facility in Perris also houses the DAR reservation call center. RTA offers taxi overflow through Network Paratransit. Facility Modernization RTA is a recipient of Proposition 1B funds, known as "The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006." Proposition 1B sets aside funds for two transportation improvement purposes: (1) Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) to fund capital projects that relate to infrastructure improvement; and (2) California Transit Security Grant Program -California Transit Assistance Fund (CTSGP-CTAF) for transit system safety, security and disaster response capital projects. RTA has utilized Proposition 1B funds to enhance the safety and security of operational and maintenance facilities, including projects such as: security lighting upgrades; walls and fencing; security signage; fire alarm enhancements; facility video surveillance; emergency supplies; threat & vulnerability assessment; and vehicle surveillance system. In October 2011, RTA was awarded funds under the FTA State of Good Repair (SGR) Bus and Bus Facilities Discretionary Program. Federal funding of $1.3 million has been allocated towards facility rehabilitation needs for the Riverside and Hemet divisions. Rehabilitation projects such as painting, flooring, roofing, and underground to aboveground storage tank conversion have been completed. Implementation of a new, Agency -wide security card system is scheduled to begin in fall 2015. 14 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency New Operations and Maintenance Facility RTA is prepared to initiate the development of a facilities master plan in FY16. During the first phase of this undertaking, staff will assess future operating, maintenance and support infrastructure needs to accommodate expansion services as well as emerging vehicle and energy/fuel technologies and strategies. Following this assessment, staff will develop a comprehensive facilities master plan to advance RTA beyond the current 10-year (2025) planning horizon. At capacity already, RTA is able to operate in the short-term with existing operating and maintenance facilities. Without a comprehensive facilities master plan, RTA will be unable to efficiently implement service improvements, make major investments in new technologies and support infrastructure, and aggressively compete for discretionary grant funding sources. 1.7 Existing Coordination Between Transit Agencies RTA is one of two designated Consolidated Transportation Services Agencies (CTSA) in Riverside County, the other being SunLine Transit Agency in the Coachella Valley. RTA's role as a CTSA is to assist RCTC in coordinating public transit throughout the approximate 2,500-square-mile service area; support driver training and technical workshops; and assist with preparing grant applications. 15 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency Regional Coordination In the cities of Corona, Beaumont and Banning, RTA coordinates regional services with the Corona Cruiser and Pass Transit. In the City of Riverside, RTA coordinates with Riverside Special Services, which provides complementary ADA compliant service to RTA's fixed routes. Additionally, RTA staff periodically meets with social service providers, bus riders, and other advocates through forums such as RCTC's Citizens Advisory Committee, RTA's quarterly ADA meetings, Transportation NOW (T-NOW) chapters, and surrounding regional transit operators. As the CTSA and a federal grantee, RTA receives FTA funds directly and indirectly and is responsible for the provision and compliance of sub -recipients adhering to federal regulations and policies. RTA has and continues to assist sub -recipients throughout Western Riverside County with applying for federal funds such as the FTA Section 5310 program. The projects funded through the 5310 program improve mobility for seniors and individuals with disabilities by removing barriers to transportation services and expanding the transportation mobility options available. The remaining projects funded through these programs include specialized public transportation initiatives that are targeted to assist low income individuals, seniors, and persons with disabilities who require support beyond conventional public transit services to maintain their independence and mobility. In FY16, RTA will continue to assist the Riverside County Regional Medical Center and its Medical Transport Project, as awarded through RCTC's 2013 Specialized Transit Call for Projects. The FTA funds will be administered by RTA, with RCTC providing the local match funds. Interregional Coordination & Transfer Agreements Though most trips are completed within RTA's service area, there is a demand to provide connectivity to areas outside of RTA's jurisdiction. As such, RTA has collaborated with other transit agencies on agreements for funding splits and/or jurisdictional overlap, in order to further interregional connectivity via public transportation. As a result of these collaborations, RTA has transfer agreements with the following agencies: Metrolink, Omnitrans, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Corona Cruiser, SunLine and Pass Transit. Metrolink tickets and passes are accepted on RTA fixed routes that serve Metrolink stations during the period from one hour before to one hour after Metrolink's service hours and are valid on the day of travel. Fare media from Omnitrans, Corona Cruiser and Pass Transit are accepted at transfer locations at the equivalent base fare rate, excluding CommuterLink service, on the day of travel. OCTA fare media is accepted for base fare on CommuterLink Route 216 at transfer locations in Orange County as well as La Sierra Metrolink between RTA Route 15 and OCTA Route 794. Current and retired employees as well as dependents of Omnitrans and OCTA are eligible to ride any local fixed route or CommuterLink in the RTA service area. 16 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency In FY16, RTA will continue to collaborate with these agencies to provide options for enhanced interregional connectivity via transfer and funding agreements, and jurisdictional overlap. 17 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency CHAPTER 2: ROUTE PERFORMANCE & EXISTING SERVICE 2.1 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RTA evaluates and plans for its services using RTA adopted Service Standards and Warrants metrics and those set by RCTC's Productivity Improvement Program (PIP), which are both updated annually. Service Standards and Warrants The Service Standards and Warrants guidelines are design standards that set the requirements for a minimum level of service that respects service quality characteristics such as route structure, service area coverage, operating hours, and on -time performance. There are several factors that are typically considered when objectively measuring service performance. These factors, used in conjunction with the PIP measurements, help determine whether service is cost effective. SUMMARY OF SERVICE Population Density STANDARDS AND WARRANTS Density is determined by the number of people housed per square mile or the number of employees per square mile. RTA aims to serve at least 85 percent of all residences, places of work, high schools, colleges, and shopping centers with access to bus service. Route Classifications RTA service can be classified into five fixed route tiers — frequent key corridor, supporting local, regional connector, community feeder, and CommuterLink. Complementary to the fixed route service is Dial -A -Ride. See Table 3A for the route classification of each route. Span of Service The span of service, the hours of operation, refers to the start and end time of a route. Depending on the route structure (i.e., frequent key corridor, supporting local, regional connector, community feeder), the span of service will vary based on the demand in the community. Bus Stop Spacing Depending on the population density, bus stop spacing in urban areas usually averages about 1,500 ft. (.28 miles) to 2,500 ft. (.47 miles). As service approaches more suburban and rural areas, bus stop spacing may be limited to locations with accessible curb and gutters and sidewalks suitable for ADA compliance. On -Time Performance RTA requires that no bus shall leave a time point early, and should arrive at a time point no later than six minutes after the scheduled arrival time. This limit is appropriate for RTA's service area due to the average distance traveled by each route and the combined rural and urban areas. 18 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency Headways (Frequency) Headways are the timed intervals between each scheduled trip within a fixed route bus (e.g., the bus runs every 30 minutes). Headways range anywhere from every 20 minutes to every 120 minutes, depending on the density, and are aimed at operating in 20 minute increments for frequent key corridor, supporting local, and regional connector tiers. Community feeders and CommuterLink routes may vary depending on demand. Transfer Wait Time In more urbanized areas such as downtown Riverside, transfer wait times will not be longer than approximately 20 minutes. In smaller urbanized and even in rural areas, the transfer wait time can reach up to 30 to 45 minutes depending on the frequencies of the routes in the area. Load Factor (Maximum Vehicle Loads) Depending on the bus, the maximum number of passengers should not exceed 150 percent of the seating capacity or the legal weight limit of the bus. Dial -A -Ride vehicles should not exceed 100 percent of the seated capacity. Source: RTA Service Standards and Warrants (2012) Productivity vs. Coverage Target To help improve effectiveness and efficiency, RTA sets a target for the productivity level of service to operate. In order to meet productivity requirements, while continuing to provide coverage to areas that would not be served if performance were the only factor, RTA has adopted standards requiring 60 percent of their fixed route service to perform up to productivity standards while the remaining 40 percent of fixed routes operate to maintain coverage. This means that service that exceeds performance standards enable a minimal level of operations in areas of need that do not meet performance standards. Given RTA's diverse and widespread service area, there are places that are being served based on the need to provide coverage. The 60/40 split establishes a benchmark for productive service to meet mandatory farebox recovery. However, it also allows for new service to be implemented following Transportation Development Act (TDA) guidelines for exemption based on performance standards within the year the service was implemented and the following two fiscal years. This objective also enables RTA to maintain highly productive service and still meet the requirements of Title VI. It is the policy of RTA to ensure compliance with Title VI so that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any transit program or activity. 19 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency Warrants for New Service The Service Standards and Warrants are also used as a guide for the implementation of new service. New service can be exempted from meeting the required criteria for up to two years plus the year of commencement. New service is evaluated during this initial period using the PIP and service standards. The objective is to give a route time to perform up to standards, or it may be discontinued. Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) There is no Productivity Improvement Program. It was replaced, per RCTC, with an Annual State of Public Transit Report that will be based on audited information of operators after the end of the preceding fiscal year. 2.2 EXISTING FIXED ROUTE & DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE In FY15, RTA budgeted 740,220 revenue hours for the operation of almost 12.0 million revenue miles system -wide. Total revenue hours budgeted was 539,387 for fixed routes and 200,833 for DAR. Total revenue miles included 8.3 million for fixed routes and 3.7 million for DAR. Passenger growth has exceeded projections in recent years due to significant increases in pass programs, customer satisfaction, rising gasoline prices, a high unemployment rate, and an improving economy. These factors, as well as other service efficiencies made in prior years, have spiked ridership and passengers per hour have continually increased. This is expected to continue in response to significant service improvements implemented in January 2015 and further improvements planned for FY16. Growth has been most evident on local and regional fixed routes. System -wide passengers reached an all-time high in FY14 with almost 9.6 million boardings and are projected to again break records for FY15. It is hoped that 10-million passenger boardings system -wide can be reached in FY16. 2.3 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS Improving productivity is a priority in which performance measures, particularly farebox recovery and passengers per hour, are monitored regularly. These two measurements are key factors in evaluating underperforming service. Performance evaluation directs staff to research and analyze unproductive routes more closely to determine whether segments or trips can be eliminated due to low ridership. This process is used and has proven to be beneficial because it streamlines services, reduces expenses, and has the least impact on customers. RTA has the 20 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency opportunity to implement service changes three times per year in the winter, spring, and fall to accommodate travel patterns and modify schedules as necessary to improve service performance. 2.4 TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROWTH MARKETS While RTA services are expanding among the public in general, students and CommuterLink users are market segments with the greatest potential for continued growth. Recent customer surveys conducted by the COA indicated that approximately 47 percent of current riders are students; about 12 percent identified as youth (K-12) and 35 percent identified as college students. The CommuterLink, or express bus market, has seen significant increases over the last six years. From FY10 to FY15, total CommuterLink ridership has increased almost 40 percent. Growth in the student market is attributable to pass programs with local colleges and universities, outreach to schools, and reduced school district funding. At the secondary level, most passengers who utilize RTA services are high school students. RTA makes every effort to reach out to districts and school sites to compile and maintain a database on bell schedules and attendance boundaries for routing and scheduling purposes. At the college level, RTA continues to develop and build relationships with college and university officials to improve transportation for their students through pass programs and enhanced services that meet the needs of students, such as later evening trips. Major initiatives were implemented in January 2015 to extend service span on routes serving community colleges until 10 p.m. on weeknights. The CommuterLink market is monitored closely to target major trip generators such as train stations, colleges and universities, and other connecting regional services. The amenities on CommuterLink routes such as the high -back upholstered seating, free Wi-Fi, and charging stations are added values to the service that attract and retain customers. To expand on this market base, RTA continually monitors capacity on express routes to foster growth by adding larger vehicles or additional trips. 2.5 TRANSIT CENTERS, EQUIPMENT AND PASSENGER AMENITIES In addition to improvements to service frequency and expanded service, the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan recommends the creation of a Timed Transfer System (TTS) and improving support infrastructure such as bus stops and transfer hubs to meet the growing demand for transit services in the most efficient manner. 21 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency As the transit provider for one of the fastest -growing counties in California, RTA continues to face the challenge of serving a rapidly growing, low -density suburban environment with limited resources. That's why it is neither feasible nor cost-effective to run direct service from every trip origin to every destination. The only system that can possibly meet this demand at this point, with existing resources, is a system that enables timed transfer connections from one service or mode to another. Therefore, strategically located transfer hubs are essential to making a Timed Transfer System work at its optimum. Routes with various destinations often converge at transfer hubs. These key hubs provide transfers between multiple bus routes or modes of transportation. Some of these hubs also provide coach operators with access to restroom facilities. This section identifies numerous capital projects that would enhance customer experience and improve service operations needed to fully implement the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan. Passenger Transit Facilities Transit facilities are more than just a place to make bus connections. They can be community - centered, multi -modal facilities where bus and rail customers share a selection of mobility choices. These modes of travel can include single -occupancy vehicles, carpools, vanpools, bicycles, pedestrian walkways, local and commuter express buses, light rail and regional rail networks. Transit hubs are generally owned by various public agencies and are well -situated for the advancement of public -private investment partnerships leading to transit -oriented commercial and residential development. The following is a summary of the existing and planned transit facilities in the RTA service area: Perris Station Transit Center: Completed in January 2010, this transit center is located in the City of Perris at C Street and 4th Street (State Route 74) and has eight bus bays served by seven RTA routes. The facility will ultimately handle multi -modal transfers between Metrolink; RTA local, regional and express routes; and park -and -ride patrons in the southwest region. Corona Transit Center: This transit center was opened in September 2010 and is located off Grand Boulevard and North Main Street and includes eight bus bays and a pedestrian bridge 22 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency pedestrian bridge to trains at the North Main Corona Metrolink Station. Galleria at Tyler Bus Stop Improvements: The demand for enhanced connections and improved bus stop amenities prompted RTA to improve the stops at the Galleria Mall at Tyler, which serves nine routes and more than 3,000 daily boardings and alightings. Completed in October 2014 and nearly doubling in size, the transit facility now includes six bus bays with new passenger shelters equipped with solar lighting. The facility also includes real-time arrival and departure information and customer amenities that comply with Americans with Disabilities (ADA) design standards. Reinforced concrete bus pads were installed to protect the roadway and increase the useful life of this facility. These improvements can accommodate new service such as RapidLink and support existing connections between routes. Moreno Valley Mall Transfer Station: Similar to the Galleria at Tyler, the transfer station at Moreno Valley Mall is integral toward establishing transfers within RTA's network. Completed in March 2015, the station, which serves seven bus routes, has tripled in size to include six upgraded bus bays with pedestrian amenities that comply with ADA design standards. New transit shelters with solar lighting, information kiosks, benches and trash receptacles were installed. Concrete bus pads were also installed to preserve the roadway and increase the useful life of the stop. On average, more than 1,500 boardings and alightings occur at this station every day. Promenade Temecula Transit Stop: The Promenade Mall in Temecula has more than 1.1 million square feet of retail, restaurants and specialty shops. Currently there is a single stop adjacent to the mall parking structure that serves six bus routes (55, 79, 202, 206, 208 and 217). To meet future demand for transit services at this destination, it is necessary to expand the current bus stop. In partnership with the City of Temecula and the Promenade Mall, RTA staff has completed conceptual plans to expand the bus stop to support a growing demand for service and maintain passenger safety. Architectural and engineering work will be completed in 2015 and construction is slated to start in early 2016 and be completed before September 2016. Downtown Riverside Operating Plan (Riverside Downtown and Vine Street Bus Stops): This project is based on a plan to modernize service in downtown Riverside and was developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA), which provides RTA with a blueprint for fixed -route operational and capital enhancements for the next 10 years. One of the key recommendations of the COA related to the RTA's service in downtown Riverside is to create an on -street grid system for passenger transfers that would consolidate certain routes to boost productivity and create better spacing between routes. Route consolidation would reduce the number of buses traveling through downtown and improve traffic circulation in the area. 23 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency The Architectural and Engineering services (A&E) for the design of the bus stop improvements in downtown Riverside have been initiated. The design concept focuses on the modernization of existing bus stops, the creation of new bus stops and passenger amenities. The concept also identifies a bus layover zone on Vine Street with capacity for seven buses. The A&E phase is expected to be completed by spring 2016 and the construction phase is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2016. RapidLink Stops (Corona-UCR Corridor and UCR-Perris Corridor): The Agency has identified the corridor between UCR and Corona primarily along University and Market/Magnolia Avenues as a candidate for limited -stop service, dubbed RapidLink. More than 9,000 customers use bus services along this corridor on weekdays. Route 1 alone has more than 7,500 daily boardings, accounting for almost 25 percent of RTA's entire weekday ridership. The UCR and Perris Metrolink Station corridor though Moreno Valley/Perris Boulevard has also been identified as a second candidate for RapidLink service due to its high ridership. RTA has initiated an Architectural and Engineering (A&E) contract for design and construction of the Corona-UCR Corridor and for conceptual design of the UCR-Perris Corridor, both of which should be completed by spring 2016. This procurement will define bus stop improvements at each of the RapidLink stops with construction completion and implementation of the Corona- UCR RapidLink service in fall 2016 and the UCR-Perris Corridor final design, construction and operations to be completed when funding for construction is secured. UC Riverside Transit Hub: UCR is one of the busiest transit hubs in the RTA transit network and roughly 25 percent of UCR students ride RTA buses. Currently at UCR, there is limited space for amenities and multimodal elements. There is also a lack of locations for bus turnarounds, which forces buses to drive loops on local streets, adding miles, time and cost. The net impact of this to operating cost is about $600,000 per year and two buses ($1 million), which prevents RTA from increasing service frequencies. To address this issue, RTA has partnered with UCR to fund a Transit Center Concept Study to determine the feasibility for a new transit turnaround and drop-off zone near the heart of the UCR campus in Parking Lot #19. The study will also determine how buses and other vehicles can be routed and where they can perform student drop-offs, pick-ups and layovers safely and conveniently. Parking Lot #19 may have enough space to build a central multimodal transit hub with a strong non -motorized transportation element. Such a hub would also have shelters and enhanced passenger amenities such as bike racks, restrooms for operators and the potential for solar - power. Capacity at the site will determine frequency and the potential addition of new routes. The study is currently under way and is expected to be completed by summer 2015. 24 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency Mt. San Jacinto Community College (MSJC), San Jacinto Stop Improvement: To facilitate timed transfer connections at MSJC, RTA will initiate the procurement of architectural and engineering work to convert the college's existing stop area to a true transit hub. The improvements could consist of a bay that can accommodate four buses with full passenger amenities. The enhanced transit support infrastructure would allow for increased transit capacity to serve the growing ridership in the San Jacinto and Hemet area. First and Last Mile Mobility Plan: In 2014, RTA was awarded Federal Section 5304 funds to develop a First Mile Last Mile Mobility Plan. In alignment with federal transportation goals, the objective of this project is to establish a plan that identifies cost-effective improvements to solve first and last mile barriers for commuters who could potentially take transit, but whose origin or destination cannot be conveniently accessed from the nearest transit facility due to distance, terrain, or real or perceived safety issues. The plan will address four pilot locations and focus on four prominent social and economic concerns: 1) accommodate rapid growth in the region, 2) improve livability and the environment through emissions reductions, 3) expand modes of transportation to enhance economic vitality, and 4) integrate land use and transportation characteristics regionally. The primary study goal will be to develop a plan to improve the mode share of public transit by bus and/or train through enhanced motorized and non -motorized methods of travel. The study will be completed with consultant assistance, and in partnership with SCAG and Caltrans. It is expected to begin in early FY16 and be completed by the end of FY17. Bus Stops Strategic Policy: RTA is in the process of conducting a Bus Stop Amenities Strategic Policy (Policy) project that will establish clear standards and guidelines, an existing inventory of bus stop amenities, and a first priority amenities upgrade plan for the allocation and deployment of bus stop amenities. Bus stop amenities can include a mixture of benches, shelters, trash receptacles, solar -powered lighting, advanced traveler information signs (ATIS), etc. Once the project is completed in summer 2015, it will provide clear guidelines for the procurement, prioritization, allocation and deployment of bus stop amenities across the entire RTA transit network. In essence, the policy will enable RTA to plan and budget bus stop amenities projects on an annual basis. La Sierra Metrolink Station Bus Stops: The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is expanding the parking area at the La Sierra Metrolink facility. As part of this expansion, RCTC is including six bus bays with passenger amenities that will support RTA's goal of implementing timed transfer connections and intermodal connectivity between rail and bus. Perris Valley Line Metrolink Stations: RTA will also utilize multi -modal stations being developed by RCTC along the proposed Perris Valley Line. Additional station locations that are planned 25 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency include the Hunter Park Station, Moreno Valley -March Station and South Perris/Menifee Station. Equipment and Passenger Amenities Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) The ITS network brings functionalities that improve the operational workflow, both internally and externally. Sophisticated Automatic Vehicle Locator programs allow the bus Dispatch Center to track the location of every equipped bus for schedule adherence and passenger loads. This feature greatly enhances schedule performance and monitoring of ridership patterns. RTA's current ITS network was launched in 2008 on the directly operated buses only, which makes up about 60 percent of RTA's fleet. In January 2014, RTA was notified by RCTC that it was selected to receive federal funds from the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program for a new ITS that will create a single program that incorporates both directly operated and contract operated fixed route services, as well as next generation technology. The project is planned to begin in FY15 and will take approximately 18 months to implement. Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) RTA has also introduced the ATIS technology with digital kiosks, known as SmartStops, which relay real-time arrival information on display at major transfer points. Currently, SmartStops are installed at heavily used bus stops in the cities of Riverside, Perris, Moreno Valley, and Corona. The next phase of the ATIS project will include querying and alerting of bus arrivals via text messaging, which will be completed concurrent with the upgraded ITS program. Mobile application development is also part of this project, which will allow passengers to lookup real- time arrival information for all RTA fixed routes. —111011, N{v.nidarendt.aom 195135.655002 TEXT "rta 12345" to 41411 RiversideTra nsit.com Get TransApp online STOP 12345 BUSWATCH PFR(1510N F,14111/1E s uMONITOR 26 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency Transit Si nal Priority (TSP) TSP is a tool that allows transit vehicles to travel through controlled intersections faster and more conveniently. Unlike signal pre-emption which is used on emergency vehicles, TSP technology on a bus utilizes a transmitter that allows the traffic signals along major streets to remain in "green" mode for several seconds longer, therefore allowing a late running bus to advance more quickly along its route to maintain on -time performance. TSP is currently being used on Route 1 along the University Avenue and Magnolia Avenue corridors. RTA is working with the City of Riverside to monitor the impact and performance. Illuminated Bus Stops In FY11, RTA purchased materials and supplies to expand and upgrade the bus stop system with additional security -enhancing illuminated bus stop devices which come equipped with down - lighting. These features are push-button activated by the customer and allow drivers to recognize when a person is waiting at a bus stop at night. The down -lighting safety feature and illuminated schedule provides bus scheduling information for easy visibility in a night time environment. On -Board Security Cameras RTA utilized Proposition 1B funds to add exterior side video cameras on all full-sized buses to enhance the Agency's ability to monitor and record activities occurring around the vehicles. These additional cameras have enhanced RTA's ability to investigate crimes and suspicious activities occurring at bus stops, transit centers and during travel on the road. The cameras provide a view of the street and all activities near the bus. When reports of crime or suspicious activities are received, RTA is able to aid law enforcement authorities by downloading the video which can be invaluable to the investigation and any subsequent prosecution. Bus Replacement and Expansion Program RTA's directly operated fleet was fully replaced as of March 2014. The new 40-foot CNG buses are manufactured by Gillig, Inc. and have state-of-the-art technology that provides enhanced passenger safety, better fuel efficiency, and decreased emissions. These vehicles were funded through State Transit Assistance (STA), Proposition 1B, and federal appropriations and grants. In FY14, the Board of Directors also approved the procurement of 25 expansion 40-foot buses, 14 of which are due for delivery in March 2016, and will be allocated for the new Perris Valley Line bus service plan and to replace older buses used for school tripper service. The other 11 buses have already arrived and are providing expanded service on existing routes, effective since the January 2015 Service Change. Board of Directors' approval will be requested to procure an additional 23 expansion vehicles; 17 for the new Route 1 Limited (RapidLink) service, and six for the SR-91 express bus routes to 27 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency Orange County. Both of these service improvements are due to commence operation in January 2017. The contract operated fleet has been upgraded since 2008 with expansion vehicles that could seat up to 28 passengers compared to previous Type II vehicles which seat 12 passengers. In FY14, RTA applied for replacement vehicles through FTA Section 5307 funds. By 2016, it is anticipated that all Type II vehicles will be retired. The DAR fleet was updated in FY13 with 38 new 12 passenger Type II vehicles to replace similar units that reached the end of their useful life in FY13. In FY14, ten contingency vehicles were added to the DAR fleet for a total of 98 buses. In FY15, funding for expansion vehicles will be sought to replace the contingency vehicles. Bus Stop Amenities and Upgrades With the completion of the Bus Stops Strategic Policy in June 2015, RTA will launch an improvement initiative that will span the next three years. Based on the implementation plan, bus stops will be improved throughout the service area with upgraded accessibility, amenities and enhanced safety. These upgrades will not only benefit current riders but will also serve as strong incentives for discretionary riders to adopt public transit as a mode of travel. 28 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency CHAPTER 3: RECENT AND PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES The recently completed COA study clearly pointed to the need for significant service improvements concentrated on four core themes: 1. Frequency of Service — Ridership and customer survey data strongly pointed to service frequency as the key improvement required for RTA services to be attractive and have the capacity to grow. 2. Connectivity — Surveys also pointed to the need to better coordinate RTA services at key connection points, especially where low frequency services meet. 3. Streamlining — Changes need to focus on routing on major streets and corridors to reduce circuitous routing, duplication of service, and to improve travel times and ease of understanding of the transit network. 4. Span of Service — Surveys pointed clearly to the need to accommodate demand for later service in areas near major employment centers, colleges, and universities. Notable changes that were implemented in January 2015 under these core strategies included the following: ■ Improved service frequencies on weekdays (Routes 1, 3, 15, 19, 20, 29, 49, and 74) and weekends (Routes 15, 16, 19, 22, 27 and 74). ■ Later weekday service was added on Routes 1, 15, 20, 22 and 27. ■ Service span was extended weeknights on Routes 3, 20 and 74 to serve evening community colleges classes and jobs. ■ Route 1 span was also expanded by one hour Saturday evenings to better serve the entertainment market. ■ Sunday service was added to Route 3. 3.2 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES Service planning for the next three years will primarily focus on connectivity to the new Perris Valley Rail Line and recommended strategies from the COA, contingent upon the necessary financial resources and approval by the Board of Directors. Additional recommendations may be derived from other sources such as transit center site feasibility studies, customer comments, coach operator feedback, public surveys, and other agencies or organization actions. Planned changes for FY16 are expected to be implemented in the first six months, and will include: 29 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency Perris Valley Rail Line (PVL) Connectivity: RTA fixed route bus services will be modified to serve the four new PVL rail stations as follows: • Hunter Park Station: o Modify existing Route 13 trips (and add additional trips) to travel via Marlborough Street, Rustin Avenue, and Spruce Street in Riverside to serve this station (and a new Riverside County Mental Health Center on Rustin Avenue). o Create a new shuttle Route 52 between Hunter Park and UCR (see Appendix A). • Moreno Valley/March: o Modify selected existing and new Route 20 trips to travel to the station located off Meridian Parkway, just south of Alessandro Blvd. o Create a new shuttle Route 26 linking the Orangecrest area of Riverside to the Moreno Valley Mall via the new Moreno Valley Station (see Appendix A). • Perris: o The existing Perris Station Transit Center is adjacent to the new Perris Rail Station. Existing and new trips on local Perris Routes 19, and 30, Lake Elsinore and Mead Valley Route 22, and Hemet Route 27, plus CommuterLink routes 208 (Sun City/Murrieta/Temecula) and 212 (Hemet/San Jacinto) will feed to/from this station. • South Perris: o Existing and new trips on Route 74, which already passes this station site on Case Road, linking Sun City, Menifee, Winchester, Hemet, and San Jacinto to this station. o Existing Route 61 will have selected existing and new trips extend between Sun City and this station, linking it with Menifee, Murrieta, and Temecula. The Perris Valley Line is expected to start operations in December of 2015. The COA 10-Year Transit Network Plan was approved by the RTA Board of Directors on January 22, 2015. In FY16, RTA is planning to implement the following COA transit network restructuring: • Create a bi-directional loop Route 8 at Lake Elsinore, replacing the existing Routes 7 and 8, which serve the eastern and western sides of Lake Elsinore, respectively. The link from Lake Elsinore to Wildomar and Temecula would be maintained by extending Route 23 from Inland Valley Medical Center at Wildomar to meet the new Route 8 loops at the Palomar/Central Streets area of Wildomar. In FY17, RapidLink limited -stop service is planned to be added to the UCR-University Avenue - Riverside -Magnolia Avenue -Corona corridor weekdays, complete with new branded buses and upgraded bus stops (see map). Service will run every 15 minutes during peak periods, from 5:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. In addition, two new CommuterLink bus routes (Riverside and Temecula to Orange County) are planned to be introduced on the SR-91 30 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency freeway following completion of new toll lanes in Riverside County, expected to open in January 2017 (see maps). 3.3 MODIFICATIONS TO PARATRANSIT SERVICE The provision of ADA services remains a challenge; it is costly both to RTA and to the passengers who use it. Efforts to mitigate the increasing expenses in DAR service included the launch of a Senior/Disabled Travel Training Program and the establishment of a Medi-Cal Reimbursement Program. The Freedom to Go Senior/Disabled Travel Training Program commenced in fall 2011 and covers all aspects of public transit from training on how to ride the bus, how to use a bus schedule and map, as well as help in overcoming physical and social barriers that may prevent passengers from using a fixed route bus. Participants benefit by developing a greater level of independence and increased mobility; ultimately bringing significant financial savings to both the customer and RTA. In FY14, more than 330 trainees actively participated in travel training. Program participants took more than 65,000 trips on fixed route. Since the program's inception, the program has served more than 750 seniors and persons with disabilities, resulting in 110,000 trips on fixed route buses through June 2014. RTA can avoid an estimated $14,000 a year for every five -day -a -week rider who makes the switch from DAR to fixed -route service. During FY14, the program saved RTA nearly $700,000, and since the program's inception, it has saved over $1.2 million. The program has been recognized by the SCAG as a recipient of the 2013 Compass Blueprint Recognition Award. In addition, the Transit Research Board (TRB) selected the RTA Freedom to Go program for a White Paper publication on best practices in the transit industry on travel training by a transit agency. The Medi-Cal Reimbursement Program was implemented in early 2012 and was developed in cooperation with the State Medi-Cal Program for paratransit trips taken to and from qualifying medical services. This program provides reimbursement of 50 percent of the net expenses associated with these trips and provides access to alternative sources of State and Federal funding for DAR services. Eligible expenses so far under this program are more than $1.1 million. 31 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency 3.4 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION A marketing and communications plan is developed to support the annual goals of RTA, while advancing the mission and vision of the organization. The plan seeks to address the following focus areas: ■ Increasing ridership ■ Increasing awareness of RTA services ■ Enhancing the image of RTA ■ Educating the public on the benefits of public transportation ■ Providing excellent customer service ■ Coordinating media and public relations ■ Government Relations ■ Assisting with employee communications Addressing these areas is accomplished by executing marketing and communication programs or campaigns targeted at existing and potential riders, commuters, the general public, elected officials, students, the business community, the media, non-profit organizations and employees. These programs and campaigns employ a mix of different media to reach the desired audiences. Marketing efforts aim to build on the existing base of awareness by educating the general public about what transit services are available, and how and where to get more information. Service Adjustments Marketing promotes information regarding service adjustments through a variety of advertising methods to reach customers including rider alerts, press releases, website, brochures distributed throughout the service area, newspaper ads, on -bus information and social media. Customer Information Materials RTA aims to make the transit system easier to understand and use through enhanced passenger information and signage. Materials are developed for both novice riders and experienced users to read and understand. Informational documents are readily available and designed to attractively promote RTA services to new users, while maintaining interest and engagement from existing riders. Public Speaking Opportunities Presentations are customized for a variety of market segments. Outreach to business and community leaders is used to educate these groups about the economic benefits that transit provides to the RTA community, while presentations for social service agencies or other gatekeeper organizations are tailored to educate these groups on how transit can enhance personal mobility and how they can help to promote its usage. Presentations also occur at senior centers, colleges, and school orientation programs and focus on how those populations can use the bus to accomplish their various tasks. 32 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency Community Relations Many of RTA's strategies rely on working through local organizations and businesses to direct very specific promotional messages to constituencies with realistic potential for using RTA's transit services. Community -based marketing and partnerships with local businesses and public agencies of this kind are cost-effective. One way RTA builds upon these relationships is by participating in community events such as expos and parades, which provides the opportunity to attract potential new users and also promote RTA as an active community partner. Website and Social Media RTA's website is used to publish up-to-date information about Agency services, policies and publications. RTA also utilizes social media, including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram and iAlerts. Social media is a relatively inexpensive advertising format that allows RTA to provide information quickly and easily to users while raising RTA's profile and brand. Customer Information Center The Customer Information Center provides phone information to customers seven days a week. As call volumes fluctuate, RTA maintains staffing levels to adequately meet its customers' needs. Various resources like Transtar and Google Transit trip planners, and Transit Master bus tracking, allow customer representatives to quickly and accurately answer all customer inquiries. English- and Spanish-speaking clerks are always available to assist callers. For other language requirements, both written and verbal, RTA uses the service of LanguageLine Solutions which provide interpretation and translation in more than 200 languages. Transportation NOW (T-NOW) T-NOW was formed in 1992 as a grassroots advocacy group comprised of public transit advocates. Members of T-NOW range from elected officials to community activists to everyday transit users who are committed not only to addressing regional transportation issues but meeting the needs of individual communities. There are six T-NOW chapters throughout the service area that include Greater Riverside, Hemet/San Jacinto Area, Northwest, Moreno Valley/Perris, San Gorgonio Pass Area, and Southwest. Each chapter meets monthly and sets goals and objectives relevant to their communities. 3.5 BUDGET IMPACT ON PROPOSED CHANGES Planned service changes in FY16 and beyond are contingent upon economic conditions and available revenue. Therefore, should funding be unavailable for planned services and projects, the implementation and service improvements in conjunction with them will be delayed until sufficient revenue is available. Any new service should also adhere to RTA's Sustainable Funding Source Policy that was approved in September 2010. The enactment of the policy provides a framework that assures that funding sources, particularly temporary financial 33 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency assistance or "seed" money are utilized only on service that has a significant potential to be productive and financially sustainable when funding expires or is depleted. This encourages the use of new or expanded service to demonstrate that it is warranted by meeting productivity standards over an established period of time. 34 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL & CAPITAL PLANS RTA's FY 2016 budget reflects a strategy to commence implementation of the COA recommendations that fit within current financial constraints. To that end, RTA is planning for a service level that balances forecasted fiscal constraints with the varied profile of the service area as well as adjustments to record ridership demand and pre -positioning for future service. Staff remains fully committed to exploring all service and financial alternatives necessary to meeting the public transit needs of the citizens who live and work in western Riverside County. Public transportation helps alleviate congestion, ensures mobility, promotes more livable communities, and assists with meeting additional needs that arise as a result of the ADA. 4.1 OPERATING & CAPITAL BUDGET The total budget for FY 2016 is $96,115,315, with $69,079,587 projected for operating expenses and $27,035,728 projected for capital projects. Due to the prudence exercised over the past few years and the improving economy, RTA is expecting an overall operating budget increase over FY 2015. As currently budgeted, total operating expenses for FY 2016 are $69,079,587 — an increase of $2,106,606 or 3.1 percent over FY 2015. It should be noted that RTA is planning for an increase of 7.5 percent in revenue service hours. The FY 2016 capital budget represents a decrease of $13,355,420 or 33 percent from FY 2015 levels. The significant decrease in the capital budget request is attributable to the opposite effect of the FY 2015 re -programming, or roll forward, of Federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) and Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds for the purchase of expansion heavy-duty CNG buses. The FY 2016 capital budget includes approximately $13 million of additional Prop 113 funds. Operating Budget Profile $45,911,139 o Operations ■ Maintenance o Planning ■ Administration 35 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency The proposed Operating Budget totals $69,079,587. Operations, at 67%, constitute the largest component of the proposed budget while Maintenance makes up 14% of the total. Thus, combined Operations and Maintenance equate to 81% of the budget. Planning and Administration combined make up the remaining 19% of the budget. These percentage breakdowns are consistent with prior years. The operating budget contains five (5) major cost elements. The elements are: ■ Salaries and Benefits (52%), which are made up of wages and fringe benefits including medical, Worker's Compensation, and Other Post -Employment Benefits Annual Required Contribution (OPEB ARC). ■ Purchased Transportation (34%), which represents the resources required for contracted transportation services for DAR/Taxi Overflow and certain fixed -route services. ■ Materials and Supplies (5%), made up primarily of operating supplies including tires, parts, fuel, and lubricants for the operation, repair & maintenance of Agency vehicles. ■ Services (4%) include, but are not limited to, external auditing, legal, marketing, outside maintenance / custodial, armored transport, actuarial services, legislative consulting, and towing. ■ Other Expenses (5%) include, but are not limited to, insurance, utilities, printing and publications, advertising and promotion, dues and subscriptions, and other miscellaneous expenses. $3,147,705 $23,692,259 $3,272,008 $2,849,733 36 117 882 Capital Budget Profile oSalaries & Benefits ■ Services OMaterials & Supplies ■ Purchased Transportation ■ Other Expenses The proposed FY 2016 Capital Budget totals $27,035,728. Capital funding will be used for the purchase of critical items to maintain existing operations and service levels. The Capital Budget 36 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency is a component of the comprehensive five-year Capital Improvement Plan including equipment and upgrade of agency infrastructure. FY 2016 Capital Budget profile by project element is shown below: $3,889,922 $13,974,649 $933,077 $569,480 $7,668,600 0 Maintenance ■ Non -Revenue Vehicles ■ Revenue Vehicles ■ Facilities ■ Shelters & Stops Notable capital projects included in the proposed FY 2016 budget include: ■ Purchase of replacement and expansion revenue vehicles ■ Purchase of replacement support vehicles and trucks ■ Associated Transit Improvements ■ Critical maintenance and administrative support equipment ■ Shelters and stops RapidLink infrastructure and other stop enhancements ■ Partial funding for new Operations and Maintenance facility 37 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside 7ransii Agency 4.2 FUNDING SOURCES FOR OPERATING & CAPITAL PROGRAMS Funding for the Operating and Capital Budgets are generated from state, federal and local revenue sources. The chart shown below summarizes the allocation of each revenue source. Total Operating & Capital Revenues $96,115, 315 Operating Revenues $69,079,587 Passenger Fares (Regular) $11,800,104 LTF Operating Assistance $39,328,178 Federal Operating Assistance $14,387,873 FTA Section 5307 $13,176, 000 FTA Section 5310 $300,500 FTA Section 5311 $579,773 FTA Section 5304 $171,600 JARC (5316) / New Freedom (5317) $160,000 Other Local Revenues $730,000 Measure A $2,833,432 Capital Revenues $27,035,728 Federal $9,931,956 FTA Section 5307 $7,928,251 FTA Section 5310 $23,000 FTA Section 5339 $1,980,705 STA $4,087,831 Prop 1 B PTMISEA $12,045,649 Prop 1 B CTSGP $911,470 Cap & Trade Low Carbon Transit Ops $58,822 38 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency The amounts depicted above do not include the "pass -through" funding for the social service programs that RTA will oversee on behalf of RCTC. 4.3 REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS As a recipient of state and federal funding, RTA is required to comply with regulatory policies and procedures that are reviewed and audited regularly. SUMMARY OF REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS TDA Triennial Audit: Under the State of California, TDA provides two major sources of funding for public transportation: LTF and STA fund. These funds are for the development and support of public transportation needs that exist in California and are allocated to areas of each county based on population, taxable sales and transit performance. The last TDA Triennial Audit was completed in January 2014. See Table 6 for a summary of the recommendations and actions taken. FTA Triennial Review: The triennial review is a comprehensive review of compliance with FTA requirements that is conducted of Section 5307 grantees at least every three years. Even though the review is conducted of Section 5307 grantees, it addresses all FTA programs for which the grantee is the direct recipient of funds, including Sections 5307, 5309, 5310, 5316, and 5317. It addresses the grantee's implementation of Federal requirements in 24 areas and its oversight of sub -recipients, operations contractors, or lessees funded by these programs. The last FTA Triennial Review was completed in January 2014 and RTA had no deficiencies. ADA: The federal ADA Act of 1990 prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity and access with persons with disability. Under the ADA Act, public transit operators are required to provide complementary paratransit service to persons who are ADA certified and are within three-quarters of a mile of a local fixed route bus during the hours of bus service operation. RTA remains fully compliant with all Federal ADA regulations and has had no ADA customers denied service on DAR. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program: The federal DBE Program seeks to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of FTA's Department of Transportation -assisted contracts in the Department's highway, transit, and airport financial assistance programs and to create a level playing field on which DBEs can compete fairly for Department of Transportation - assisted contracts. As of March 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a new rule which established a three- year DBE goal. RTA's DBE Program was last submitted in September 2012 and will remain in effect through September 2015; the new DBE Program, currently in process, will be effective starting October 2016 and will remain in effect through September 2018. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO): The Federal Transit Laws, 49 U.S.C. 5332(b), provide that "no 39 Short Range Transit Plan • FY16 — FY18 Riverside Transit Agency person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or age be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any project, program or activity funded in whole or in part through financial assistance under this Act." This applies to employment and business opportunities and is considered to be in addition to the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEO Program is submitted to FTA every three years. The last submission was in March 2015. Drug and Alcohol Testing: Per the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Part 40 & 655), RTA established a Drug & Alcohol testing policy in an effort to deter drug and alcohol use in the workplace. The policy establishes the circumstances in which applicants and employees are tested for drugs and alcohol in the workplace and the consequences when they test positive. The purpose of the policy is to prevent accidents, injuries, and fatalities resulting from the misuse of alcohol and prohibited drugs by employees who perform safety -sensitive functions. The Drug and Alcohol Report is in compliance with FTA and was last updated in March 2015. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that "no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." (42 U.S.C. Section 2000d). RTA's Title VI Program is submitted to the FTA every three years. The last report was submitted in September 2013 and approved. The next submittal will be October 2016. Limited English Proficiency (LEP): FTA issued regulations based on the Executive Order 13166 to all transit operators to establish LEP policies and procedures that ensures that RTA publications are issued in English and any other languages used by a significant number of the general population in the service area as determined by periodic demographic assessments. RTA's LEP policy and plan were revised in June 2013 and submitted with the Title VI Program in September 2013. Public Hearing Policy: U.S. Code Title 49 § 5307 under the Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program requires that transit systems maintain a process to solicit and consider public comments before raising fares or implementing major reductions in service. RTA's Public Hearing Policy for Major Service and Fare Changes was last revised in October 2012. Alternative Fueled Vehicles: Resolution No. 00-018 of RCTC established an emissions standards requirement for the acquisition of urban transit buses with federal, state, or local funds. All full-sized urban public transit buses purchased or leased with federal, state, or local funds granted or programmed by RCTC shall meet the urban bus optional, reduced -emissions standards set by the California Air Resources Board for oxides of nitrogen and non -methane hydrocarbons. RTA remains fully compliant with RCTC Resolution No. 00-0018 for vehicles purchased using federal, state, or local funds. 40 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2015/16 - FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Summary Comparative Statistics: FY2015 Budget vs. Proposed FY2016 SRTP Unlinked Passengers Revenue Hours Revenue Miles Fare Revenue (1) Operating Expenses FY2015 I FY2016 FY2015 I FY2016 FY2015 I FY2016 FY2015 I FY2016 FY2015 I FY2016 Direct Operated Routes 1 2,244,509 2,065,484 73,659 76,075 816,187 850,812 $ 1,997,095 $ 1,864,186 $ 8,186,202 $ 7,750,860 3 63,887 121,384 5,672 13,864 79,841 173,225 $ 66,406 $ 117,451 $ 629,481 $ 1,430,671 10 225,226 231,727 14,169 14,632 161,278 162,037 $ 202,928 $ 212,888 $ 1,574,742 $ 1,490,777 11 189,721 199,475 10,217 10,261 117,755 118,213 $ 182,151 $ 191,396 $ 1,135,548 $ 1,045,376 12 292,399 304,715 15,309 15,487 181,122 182,745 $ 256,551 $ 273,024 $ 1,701,428 $ 1,577,566 13 285,589 320,697 15,002 15,750 168,215 180,779 $ 234,954 $ 271,951 $ 1,667,374 $ 1,607,334 14 208,649 254,711 15,156 14,608 196,070 187,399 $ 185,093 $ 230,285 $ 1,687,225 $ 1,487,997 15 485,067 558,840 20,595 31,116 244,907 369,345 $ 424,385 $ 499,659 $ 2,288,950 $ 3,170,131 16 721,388 761,380 29,549 28,859 351,020 341,021 $ 638,933 $ 676,029 $ 3,283,829 $ 2,940,128 18 204,935 217,877 10,441 10,748 133,305 134,442 $ 192,311 $ 189,684 $ 1,160,465 $ 1,094,796 19 605,863 678,038 22,738 31,885 304,826 416,513 $ 615,738 $ 666,511 $ 2,527,308 $ 3,249,066 20 324,314 366,724 17,571 25,046 268,582 387,970 $ 302,942 $ 337,789 $ 1,955,696 $ 2,561,079 21D 133,541 137,789 9,343 9,840 145,751 144,399 $ 130,776 $ 137,293 $ 1,038,432 $ 1,002,346 22 462,866 463,205 22,267 24,474 399,571 440,403 $ 442,176 $ 447,734 $ 2,475,112 $ 2,497,879 27 536,325 598,033 31,215 36,617 615,550 716,599 $ 547,909 $ 616,691 $ 3,469,530 $ 3,732,955 29 177,641 178,571 11,334 10,349 167,922 164,254 $ 167,907 $ 170,964 $ 1,260,436 $ 1,054,286 41D 69,274 62,957 3,816 3,824 60,058 60,529 $ 68,020 $ 61,779 $ 424,186 $ 389,821 49 214,351 268,520 9,051 10,149 108,491 127,710 $ 201,704 $ 257,296 $ 1,005,904 $ 1,033,879 202D 2,687 1,387 483 211 20,424 6,962 $ 5,984 $ 2,923 $ 53,337 $ 22,582 204D 49,772 56,482 4,568 5,932 107,829 135,708 $ 86,823 $ 92,071 $ 510,120 $ 604,702 206D 69,557 74,748 5,948 7,350 187,073 172,241 $ 194,905 $ 202,523 $ 661,226 $ 749,219 208D 24,702 23,503 2,581 2,853 69,562 69,474 $ 32,804 $ 31,568 $ 287,012 $ 290,781 210D 3,604 3,359 711 638 17,255 7,617 $ 8,650 $ 8,515 $ 79,352 $ 65,055 212D 3,576 1,015 34,510 $ 13,866 $ $ 113,360 $ 216 97,430 101,397 7,698 8,242 202,954 204,462 $ 482,261 $ 476,330 $ 855,609 $ 839,810 217D 6,584 8,343 1,122 1,135 29,907 30,142 $ 22,494 $ 16,115 $ 124,707 $ 115,701 Total Direct Operated Routes 7,703,456 8,059,346 361,231 409,948 5,189,966 5,785,001 $ 7,705,766 $ 8,052,654 $ 40,156,569 $ 41,804,796 % Change - FY16 vs. FY15 4.62 % 13.49 % 11.47 % 4.5 % 4.1 % Contracted Fixed Routes 3 73,939 37,514 8,249 6,303 112,807 80,839 $ 93,628 $ 42,950 $ 589,642 $ 434,050 7 125,669 127,089 10,191 9,977 147,390 134,908 $ 127,479 $ 127,661 $ 732,894 $ 697,151 8 147,193 155,110 10,153 9,948 179,468 141,624 $ 161,044 $ 169,039 $ 730,108 $ 695,209 19C 7,157 8,483 1,191 1,043 15,056 15,532 $ 4,844 $ 6,477 $ 85,460 $ 72,785 21C - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - 23 88,203 88,207 11,120 14,128 170,969 185,907 $ 88,970 $ 88,163 $ 800,721 $ 989,323 24 88,153 79,334 11,174 10,747 153,899 147,594 $ 92,587 $ 85,109 $ 804,539 $ 751,236 30 73,092 75,265 7,348 9,024 84,229 95,730 $ 69,927 $ 74,648 $ 528,471 $ 632,795 31 116,341 119,627 11,231 11,431 194,562 193,765 $ 112,351 $ 117,940 $ 807,684 $ 799,056 32 158,491 168,987 10,440 10,775 121,753 107,075 $ 147,286 $ 161,805 $ 750,802 $ 753,179 33 42,002 49,062 4,934 4,870 64,086 65,231 $ 37,974 $ 45,505 $ 354,857 $ 340,488 35 71,459 67,560 6,719 7,355 158,288 156,564 $ 69,708 $ 66,013 $ 483,229 $ 514,236 40 26,665 27,254 3,557 3,616 63,236 59,650 $ 27,753 $ 28,857 $ 255,827 $ 252,806 41C 42,654 42,067 5,788 5,796 103,404 106,004 $ 42,957 $ 39,341 $ 416,239 $ 405,064 42 57,536 70,409 5,301 5,610 82,514 82,947 $ 52,208 $ 63,326 $ 381,270 $ 392,209 50 6,065 3,974 2,352 2,352 15,293 15,283 $ 159,595 $ 162,089 $ 169,095 $ 164,480 51 44,038 47,272 1,812 1,812 19,073 19,073 $ 118,000 $ 123,230 $ 130,819 $ 126,883 55 28,554 25,659 1,183 1,144 16,122 14,851 $ 16,361 $ 17,049 $ 85,114 $ 79,539 61 85,861 87,637 11,373 13,827 178,803 216,035 $ 96,241 $ 92,574 $ 817,933 $ 969,108 74 179,300 232,319 14,525 15,306 255,385 366,739 $ 183,063 $ 231,004 $ 1,045,058 $ 1,070,785 79 102,292 117,062 13,115 13,695 235,294 235,761 $ 132,802 $ 124,305 $ 943,196 $ 957,444 202 (incl. beach) 19,790 22,089 5,050 5,902 139,550 157,871 $ 45,353 $ 46,971 $ 362,985 $ 412,572 204 8,425 1,170 27,621 $ 14,632 $ $ 82,822 $ 206C 5,099 355 8,019 $ 13,867 $ $ 25,651 $ 208 31,410 31,697 6,578 7,645 192,422 169,939 $ 66,064 $ 64,859 $ 473,383 $ 536,073 210 7,804 6,819 1,148 676 19,893 14,906 $ 22,177 $ 18,406 $ 82,525 $ 47,255 212 30,041 42,625 5,919 7,844 168,064 175,275 $ 94,356 $ 76,089 $ 425,745 $ 549,723 217 21,438 26,556 6,180 6,476 195,489 197,684 $ 84,139 $ 51,293 $ 444,415 $ 452,787 26 (New) 21,432 4,291 83,528 $ $ 19,503 $ $ 305,192 52 (New) 33,417 2,026 18,809 $ $ 30,409 $ $ 144,121 Sunline- Riv. Exp. ° $ $ $ 65,000 $ 103,700 794 (2) $ 111,923 $ 146,032 $ 111,923 $ 146,032 Total Contracted Fixed Routes 1,688,670 1,814,527 178,156 193,621 3,122,689 3,259,124 $ 2,287,288 $ 2,320,646 $ 12,987,408 $ 13,795,280 % Change - FY16 vs. FY15 7.45% 8.68 % 4.37% 1.5% 6.2 % TOTAL FIXED ROUTES 9,392,126 9,873,872 539,387 603,568 8,312,655 9,044,125 $ 9,993,054 $ 10,373,301 $ 53,143,978 $ 55,600,075 % Change - FY16 vs. FY15 5.13% 11.90% 8.80% 3.8% 4.6% 8:52 AM 4/24/2015 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2015/16 - FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Summary Comparative Statistics: FY2015 Budget vs. Proposed FY2016 SRTP Unlinked Passengers Revenue Hours Revenue Miles Fare Revenue (1) Operating Expenses FY2015 FY2016 FY2015 FY2016 FY2015 FY2016 FY2015 FY2016 FY2015 FY2016 Dial -a -ride Routes Banning/Beaumont 2,022 1,332 829 601 19,182 14,168 $ 6,859 $ 3,587 $ 56,540 $ 41,870 Lake Elsinore 16,785 17,325 8,390 8,151 164,031 165,695 $ 57,541 $ 63,886 $ 572,450 $ 568,144 Highgrove 5,366 5,402 3,246 2,792 61,252 59,510 $ 16,961 $ 16,510 $ 221,475 $ 194,627 Hemet & Homeland 87,951 84,262 30,924 29,183 531,268 511,946 $ 304,803 $ 309,410 $ 2,109,832 $ 2,034,131 Jurupa 13,668 15,611 7,183 7,738 125,014 146,938 $ 47,105 $ 56,629 $ 490,054 $ 539,361 Moreno Valley 83,144 85,538 36,126 35,422 592,228 612,587 $ 279,771 $ 308,946 $ 2,464,749 $ 2,469,018 Murrieta 45,693 40,010 23,489 20,421 422,085 377,028 $ 158,317 $ 147,037 $ 1,602,558 $ 1,423,394 Norco 23,330 24,755 9,667 9,343 158,491 169,112 $ 86,438 $ 100,921 $ 659,541 $ 651,250 Perris 43,124 39,376 20,998 19,264 421,406 408,230 $ 146,945 $ 142,588 $ 1,432,620 $ 1,342,717 Riverside 79,715 78,860 40,061 36,664 750,193 728,555 $ 292,028 $ 301,955 $ 2,733,194 $ 2,555,559 Sun City 19,050 19,968 9,927 10,087 189,979 196,348 $ 63,322 $ 68,536 $ 677,293 $ 703,060 Total Dial -a -ride Routes 419,848 412,439 190,840 179,666 3,435,128 3,390,119 $ 1,460,090 $ 1,520,005 $ 13,020,306 $ 12,523,132 % Change - FY16 vs. FY15 -1.76 % -5.86% -1.31 % 4.1 % -3.8 % Taxi Program Banning/Beaumont 777 1,045 485 411 12,741 15,887 $ 3,429 $ 4,014 $ 42,543 $ 51,346 Lake Elsinore 743 1,577 535 1,018 11,840 26,596 $ 3,414 $ 6,725 $ 40,306 $ 88,547 Highgrove 1,298 1,200 825 773 19,621 19,523 $ 5,959 $ 5,096 $ 66,231 $ 65,197 Hemet & Homeland 1,278 2,646 980 1,704 24,948 43,764 $ 5,244 $ 8,958 $ 83,583 $ 145,934 Jurupa 528 780 362 507 10,220 10,050 $ 2,346 $ 3,004 $ 33,878 $ 34,415 Moreno Valley 1,631 1,570 964 1,013 28,254 20,117 $ 6,345 $ 5,864 $ 93,316 $ 68,879 Murrieta 1,433 1,784 1,136 1,146 25,475 27,937 $ 6,027 $ 7,315 $ 86,587 $ 93,613 Norco 1,559 1,889 864 1,221 23,318 29,856 $ 5,345 $ 7,670 $ 77,644 $ 100,016 Perris 1,386 2,294 858 1,483 18,127 29,098 $ 4,929 $ 8,541 $ 62,067 $ 99,764 Riverside 3,913 3,707 2,686 2,394 58,322 50,468 $ 13,261 $ 15,501 $ 199,008 $ 171,648 Sun City 446 804 298 519 6,958 10,877 $ 1,696 $ 2,543 $ 23,535 $ 37,020 Total Taxl Routes 14,992 19,296 9,993 12,187 239,825 284,172 $ 57,995 $ 75,230 $ 808,698 $ 956,380 % Change - FY16 vs. FY15 28.71 % 21.96% 18.49% 29.7% 18.3% TOTAL DAR and TAXI SERVICE 434,840 431,735 200,833 191,853 3,674,953 3,674,291 $ 1,518,085 $ 1,595,235 $ 13,829,004 $ 13,479,511 % Change - FY16 vs. FY15 -0.71 % -4.47% -0.02% 5.1 % -2.5% GRAND TOTAL 9,826,966 10,305,607 740,220 795,421 11,987,608 12,718,416 $ 11,511,139 $ 11,968,536 $ 66,972,981 $ 69,079,587 % Change - FY16 vs. FY15 4.87% 7.46% 6.10% 4.0% 3.1 % ') Total Passenger Fare Revenue consists of cash fares, tickets, passes, subsidy agreements and Measure A. It does not include other local revenues. (2) RTA does not report passengers, hours and miles. 8:52 AM 4/24/2015 ��EME�� fvmqlmspzmim{ammsim Bus (Motorbus) / Directly Operated Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active # of Vehicles Contingency FY Vehicles 2014/15 FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2013 GIL 2002 NAB G27D102N4 40LFW 15 38 40 97 21 42 40 CN CN 97 0 2,891,533 2 19 29,053,314 7,242,037 13,949,845 74,660 6,974,923 Totals: 78 118 99 19 31,944,847 21,191,882 214,059 TransTrack Manager'"' Page 1 of I 4/20/2015 fvmqlmspirdim{ammsicn Commuter Bus / Directly Operated Table Z - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan System -Wide Year Built Mfg. Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active # of Vehicles Contingency FY Vehicles 2014/15 FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2014 GIL G27D102N4 38 11 42 CN 11 0 118,667 10,788 Totals: 38 11 11 0 118,667 10,788 TransTrack Manager'' Page 1 of I 5/20/2015 ��EME�� fvmqlmspzmim{ammsim Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 1994 1996 2008 2008 2009 2012 2013 2011 2003 2008 CCI CCI EBC EDN EDN EDN EDN SPC SVM SVM AH28 AH28 Aerotech EnAeroElit EnAeroElit EnAeroElit EnAeroElit SN28PLO ClassAmSer ClassAmSer 25 25 12 26 26 28 28 21 24 26 4 1 9 4 21 10 11 14 3 2 29 29 24 29 29 33 33 28 27 29 CN CN GA GA GA CN CN GA CN CN 4 1 9 4 21 10 11 14 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,007,254 279,553 3,244,071 1,439,651 6,540,596 892,688 470,271 2,253,465 829,832 404,783 1,043,887 292,194 3,005,764 1,639,845 7,596,041 1,359,489 961,952 2,817,816 894,766 450,737 260,972 292,194 333,974 409,961 361,716 135,949 87,450 201,273 298,255 225,369 Totals: 241 79 79 0 17,362,164 20,062,491 253,956 TransTrack Manager'"' Page 1 of 1 4/20/2015 ��EME�� fvmqlmspzmim{ammsim Demand Response / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Equipped Vehicle Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2008 2009 2013 EBC EBC GCC Aerotech Aerotech GCII 12 12 12 7 53 38 24 24 22 GA GA GA 2 53 38 5 0 0 1,506,401 11,544,413 2,064,369 1,601,923 13,075,913 3,416,971 800,962 246,715 89,920 Totals: 36 98 93 5 15,115,183 18,094,807 194,568 TransTrack Manager'"' Page 1 of I 4/20/2015 EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics . Peak -Hour Fleet 152 168 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $53,356,598 $55,837,081 $66,972,981 $44,555,701 $69,079,587 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $15,419,680 $14,823,809 $14,403,336 $11,629,258 $15,063,536 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $37,936,918 $41,013,272 $52,569,645 $32,926,443 $54,016,051 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 9,242,793 9,568,758 9,826,968 7,244,035 10,305,607 Passenger Miles 64,577,280 66,804,624 68,045,953 68,140,270 73,477,011 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 667,319.7 698,426.9 740,219.0 540,940.5 795,419.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 10,659,545.3 10,940,823.1 11,987,607.0 8,551,940.1 12,718,415.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 13,127,255.9 13,493,672.5 14,639,851.0 10,579,300.8 15,481,742.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $79.96 $79.95 $90.48 $82.37 $86.85 Farebox Recovery Ratio 28.90% 26.55% 21.50% 26.10% 21.80% Subsidy per Passenger $4.10 $4.29 $5.35 $4.55 $5.24 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.59 $0.61 $0.77 $0.48 $0.74 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $56.85 $58.72 $71.02 $60.87 $67.91 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.56 $3.75 $4.39 $3.85 $4.25 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 13.9 13.7 13.3 13.4 13.0 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.87 0.87 0.82 0.85 0.81 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of I EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics . Peak -Hour Fleet 139 133 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $53,209,787 $55,837,081 $63,577,152 $41,698,720 $61,758,844 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $15,324,394 $14,823,809 $13,897,602 $11,135,633 $14,158,176 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $37,885,393 $41,013,272 $49,679,550 $30,563,087 $47,600,668 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 9,241,973 9,568,758 9,385,576 6,836,365 9,481,752 Passenger Miles 64,570,993 66,804,624 65,080,262 64,242,944 66,618,926 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 666,081.5 698,426.9 692,957.0 498,990.3 698,741.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 10,648,310.4 10,940,823.1 11,205,318.0 7,872,693.1 11,033,061.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 13,098,585.2 13,493,672.5 13,654,523.0 9,669,836.8 13,379,259.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $79.88 $79.95 $91.75 $83.57 $88.39 Farebox Recovery Ratio 28.80% 26.55% 21.85% 26.70% 22.92% Subsidy per Passenger $4.10 $4.29 $5.29 $4.47 $5.02 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.59 $0.61 $0.76 $0.48 $0.71 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $56.88 $58.72 $71.69 $61.25 $68.12 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.56 $3.75 $4.43 $3.88 $4.31 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 13.9 13.7 13.5 13.7 13.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.87 0.87 0.84 0.87 0.86 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of I EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics . Peak -Hour Fleet 13 35 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $146,811 $3,395,829 $2,856,981 $7,320,743 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $95,286 $505,734 $493,625 $905,360 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $51,525 $2,890,095 $2,363,356 $6,415,383 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 820 441,392 407,670 823,855 Passenger Miles 6,287 2,965,691 3,897,325 6,858,085 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 1,238.2 47,262.0 41,950.2 96,678.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 11,234.9 782,289.0 679,247.0 1,685,354.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 28,670.7 985,328.0 909,464.0 2,102,483.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $118.57 $71.85 $68.10 $75.72 Farebox Recovery Ratio 64.90% 14.89% 17.28% 12.36% Subsidy per Passenger $62.84 $6.55 $5.80 $7.79 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $8.20 $0.97 $0.61 $0.94 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $41.61 $61.15 $56.34 $66.36 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.59 $3.69 $3.48 $3.81 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 0.7 9.3 9.7 8.5 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.07 0.56 0.60 0.49 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of I EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics . Peak -Hour Fleet 89 98 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $31,725,709 $32,437,603 $40,221,570 $26,273,273 $41,908,496 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $11,456,230 $10,893,475 $10,597,962 $8,619,383 $11,147,653 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $20,269,479 $21,544,128 $29,623,608 $17,653,890 $30,760,843 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 7,136,257 7,417,199 7,703,457 5,606,535 8,059,346 Passenger Miles 45,957,495 47,766,762 49,224,970 51,636,187 54,052,406 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 316,228.5 328,438.8 361,230.0 265,934.1 409,945.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 4,440,790.2 4,626,710.5 5,189,965.0 3,766,777.0 5,785,001.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 5,148,348.0 5,346,422.9 6,023,546.0 4,358,272.6 6,741,401.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $100.33 $98.76 $111.35 $98.80 $102.23 Farebox Recovery Ratio 36.11% 33.58% 26.34% 32.81% 26.59% Subsidy per Passenger $2.84 $2.90 $3.85 $3.15 $3.82 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.44 $0.45 $0.60 $0.34 $0.57 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $64.10 $65.60 $82.01 $66.38 $75.04 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.56 $4.66 $5.71 $4.69 $5.32 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 22.6 22.6 21.3 21.1 19.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.61 1.60 1.48 1.49 1.39 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of 1 EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA Bus (Contract) -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics . Peak -Hour Fleet 63 70 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $10,793,880 $11,457,338 $12,810,484 $9,315,605 $13,545,549 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $2,373,298 $2,349,671 $2,175,366 $1,736,740 $2,174,615 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $8,420,582 $9,107,667 $10,635,118 $7,578,865 $11,370,934 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,713,555 1,744,652 1,688,671 1,328,561 1,814,526 Passenger Miles 13,982,609 14,236,360 13,683,873 12,701,043 14,109,946 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 160,767.2 171,062.8 178,156.0 137,011.4 193,619.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 2,887,793.8 2,968,567.0 3,122,689.0 2,345,690.0 3,259,124.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 3,975,170.8 4,122,168.0 4,231,631.0 3,238,045.0 4,262,530.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.14 $66.98 $71.91 $67.99 $69.96 Farebox Recovery Ratio 21.99% 20.51% 16.98% 18.64% 16.05% Subsidy per Passenger $4.91 $5.22 $6.30 $5.70 $6.27 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.60 $0.64 $0.78 $0.60 $0.81 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $52.38 $53.24 $59.70 $55.32 $58.73 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.92 $3.07 $3.41 $3.23 $3.49 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 10.7 10.2 9.5 9.7 9.4 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.59 0.59 0.54 0.57 0.56 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of I EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics . Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $10,256,362 $11,391,192 $13,020,306 $8,416,628 $12,523,131 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $1,449,994 $1,440,592 $1,460,090 $1,143,527 $1,520,005 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $8,806,368 $9,950,600 $11,560,216 $7,273,101 $11,003,126 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 384,442 398,636 419,848 300,205 412,439 Passenger Miles 4,536,416 4,703,905 4,960,206 3,695,524 5,077,125 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 184,753.3 193,255.7 190,840.0 132,345.0 179,666.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 3,181,441.6 3,207,681.9 3,435,129.0 2,293,415.5 3,390,117.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 3,854,217.5 3,887,218.0 4,144,820.0 2,836,925.5 4,193,638.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $55.51 $58.94 $68.23 $63.60 $69.70 Farebox Recovery Ratio 14.14% 12.65% 11.21% 13.59% 12.13% Subsidy per Passenger $22.91 $24.96 $27.53 $24.23 $26.68 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.94 $2.12 $2.33 $1.97 $2.17 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $47.67 $51.49 $60.58 $54.96 $61.24 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.77 $3.10 $3.37 $3.17 $3.25 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.12 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of I EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA Taxi -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics . Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $475,043 $444,455 $808,698 $468,047 $956,379 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $34,551 $33,576 $57,995 $35,190 $75,231 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $440,492 $410,879 $750,703 $432,857 $881,148 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 8,539 8,271 14,992 8,734 19,296 Passenger Miles 100,760 97,598 176,904 107,516 237,534 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 5,570.7 5,669.5 9,993.0 5,650.0 12,189.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 149,519.7 137,863.7 239,824.0 146,057.6 284,173.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 149,519.7 137,863.7 239,854.0 146,057.6 284,173.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $85.27 $78.39 $80.93 $82.84 $78.46 Farebox Recovery Ratio 7.27% 7.55% 7.17% 7.52% 7.86% Subsidy per Passenger $51.59 $49.68 $50.07 $49.56 $45.66 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $4.37 $4.21 $4.24 $4.03 $3.71 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $79.07 $72.47 $75.12 $76.61 $72.29 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.95 $2.98 $3.13 $2.96 $3.10 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of I EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2015/16 All Routes Peak Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy RTA-0 Total $3,095,000 ($3,095,000) RTA-1 Total 16 2,065,484 11,122,852 76,075.0 80,156.0 850,812.0 970,654.0 $7,750,859 $1,864,184 $5,886,675 RTA-10 Total 4 231,727 1,247,143 14,632.0 15,252.0 162,037.0 173,668.0 $1,490,777 $212,888 $1,277,889 RTA-11 Total 2 199,475 1,074,967 10,261.0 10,586.0 118,213.0 128,037.0 $1,045,376 $191,396 $853,980 RTA-12 Total 3 304,715 1,639,912 15,487.0 16,057.0 182,745.0 197,205.0 $1,577,566 $273,024 $1,304,542 RTA-13 Total 3 320,697 1,726,028 15,750.0 16,368.0 180,779.0 193,169.0 $1,607,334 $271,951 $1,335,383 RTA-14 Total 3 254,711 1,371,794 14,608.0 15,153.0 187,399.0 199,080.0 $1,487,997 $230,285 $1,257,712 RTA-15 Total 6 558,840 3,009,341 31,116.0 31,969.0 369,345.0 392,520.0 $3,170,131 $499,659 $2,670,472 RTA-16/16E Total 6 761,380 4,100,444 28,859.0 29,741.0 341,021.0 363,640.0 $2,940,128 $676,029 $2,264,099 RTA-18 Total 2 217,877 1,172,773 10,748.0 11,280.0 134,442.0 149,145.0 $1,094,796 $189,684 $905,112 RTA-19 Total 6 678,038 3,649,238 31,885.0 33,969.0 416,513.0 485,044.0 $3,249,066 $666,511 $2,582,555 RTA-19C Total 1 8,483 56,402 1,043.0 1,275.0 15,532.0 20,086.0 $72,785 $6,477 $66,308 RTA-20 Total 6 366,724 1,975,094 25,046.0 26,777.0 387,970.0 427,711.0 $2,561,079 $337,789 $2,223,290 RTA-202 Total 3 22,089 519,997 5,902.0 7,363.0 157,871.0 213,587.0 $412,572 $46,971 $365,601 RTA-202D Total 2 1,387 7,478 211.0 362.0 6,962.0 10,003.0 $22,582 $2,923 $19,659 RTA-204D Total 3 56,482 1,063,557 5,932.0 6,215.0 135,708.0 140,319.0 $604,702 $92,071 $512,631 RTA-206D Total 6 74,748 1,407,507 7,350.0 12,250.0 172,241.0 316,999.0 $749,219 $202,523 $546,696 RTA-208 Total 4 31,697 734,108 7,645.0 9,997.0 169,939.0 270,290.0 $536,073 $64,859 $471,214 RTA-208D Total 2 23,503 442,571 2,853.0 4,099.0 69,474.0 109,387.0 $290,781 $31,568 $259,213 RTA-21 Total 2 137,789 741,768 9,840.0 10,308.0 144,399.0 160,838.0 $1,002,346 $137,293 $865,053 RTA-210 Total 1 6,819 157,929 676.0 1,313.0 14,906.0 43,406.0 $47,255 $18,406 $28,849 RTA-210D Total 1 3,359 63,244 638.0 959.0 7,617.0 16,098.0 $65,055 $8,515 $56,540 RTA-212 Total 4 42,625 987,185 7,844.0 10,290.0 175,275.0 249,845.0 $549,723 $76,089 $473,634 RTA-216 Total 2 101,397 2,069,970 8,242.0 8,816.0 204,462.0 274,224.0 $839,810 $476,330 $363,480 RTA-217 Total 4 26,556 615,035 6,476.0 8,146.0 197,684.0 265,959.0 $452,787 $51,293 $401,494 RTA-217D Total 1 8,343 157,094 1,135.0 1,285.0 30,142.0 33,157.0 $115,701 $16,115 $99,586 RTA-22 Total 5 463,205 5,501,146 24,474.0 28,039.0 440,403.0 546,912.0 $2,497,879 $447,734 $2,050,145 RTA-23 Total 5 88,207 606,369 14,128.0 16,520.0 185,907.0 324,038.0 $989,323 $88,163 $901,160 TransTrack Manager"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of 6 EMI EME� fomql.oepzmim{ammsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2015/16 All Routes Peak Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy RTA-24 Total 3 79,334 544,158 10,747.0 12,358.0 147,594.0 217,995.0 $751,236 $85,109 $666,127 RTA-26 Total 2 21,432 149,810 4,291.0 4,643.0 83,528.0 93,748.0 $305,192 $19,503 $285,689 RTA-27 Total 7 598,033 7,108,327 36,617.0 40,565.0 716,599.0 827,001.0 $3,732,955 $616,691 $3,116,264 RTA-29 Total 2 178,571 961,593 10,349.0 10,723.0 164,254.0 173,824.0 $1,054,286 $170,964 $883,322 RTA-3 Total 4 37,514 253,800 6,303.0 6,886.0 80,839.0 108,178.0 $434,050 $42,950 $391,100 RTA-30 Total 2 75,265 524,895 9,024.0 9,147.0 95,730.0 100,767.0 $632,795 $74,648 $558,147 RTA-31 Total 2 119,627 826,154 11,431.0 12,125.0 193,765.0 226,904.0 $799,056 $117,940 $681,116 RTA-32 Total 3 168,987 1,162,448 10,775.0 11,747.0 107,075.0 146,286.0 $753,179 $161,805 $591,374 RTA-33 Total 2 49,062 342,945 4,870.0 5,163.0 65,231.0 77,524.0 $340,488 $45,505 $294,983 RTA-35 Total 2 67,560 472,245 7,355.0 7,887.0 156,564.0 182,933.0 $514,236 $66,013 $448,223 RTA-3D Total 4 121,384 654,258 13,864.0 14,520.0 173,225.0 199,980.0 $1,430,671 $117,451 $1,313,220 RTA-40 Total 1 27,254 190,506 3,616.0 3,788.0 59,650.0 67,257.0 $252,806 $28,857 $223,949 RTA-41C Total 2 42,067 288,053 5,796.0 6,663.0 106,004.0 143,480.0 $405,064 $39,341 $365,723 RTA-41D Total 2 62,957 339,337 3,824.0 5,242.0 60,529.0 112,510.0 $389,821 $61,779 $328,042 RTA-42 Total 2 70,409 490,968 5,610.0 6,220.0 82,947.0 109,085.0 $392,209 $63,326 $328,883 RTA-49 Total 2 268,520 1,444,970 10,149.0 10,558.0 127,710.0 140,276.0 $1,033,879 $257,296 $776,583 RTA-50 Total 2 3,974 7,272 2,352.0 2,726.0 15,283.0 32,278.0 $164,480 $162,089 $2,391 RTA-51 Total 1 47,272 86,509 1,812.0 1,943.0 19,073.0 24,862.0 $126,883 $123,230 $3,653 RTA-52 Total 1 33,417 61,153 2,026.0 2,252.0 18,809.0 28,764.0 $144,121 $30,409 $113,712 RTA-55 Total 2 25,659 46,956 1,144.0 1,780.0 14,851.0 48,755.0 $79,539 $17,049 $62,490 RTA-61 Total 4 87,637 611,775 13,827.0 14,884.0 216,035.0 254,007.0 $969,108 $92,574 $876,534 RTA-7 Total 2 127,089 871,857 9,977.0 10,485.0 134,908.0 158,646.0 $697,151 $127,661 $569,490 RTA-74 Total 4 232,319 1,621,648 15,306.0 16,651.0 366,739.0 410,611.0 $1,070,785 $231,004 $839,781 RTA-79 Total 4 117,062 816,882 13,695.0 14,720.0 235,761.0 276,906.0 $957,444 $124,305 $833,139 RTA-794 Total $146,032 $146,032 $0 RTA-8 Total 3 155,110 1,062,887 9,948.0 10,538.0 141,624.0 166,333.0 $695,209 $169,039 $526,170 RTA-Ba/Bea Total 1,332 16,397 601.0 742.0 14,168.0 16,566.0 $41,870 $3,587 $38,283 RTA-GT DAR Total 5,402 66,499 2,792.0 3,341.0 59,510.0 70,220.0 $194,627 $16,510 $178,117 TransTrack Manager"' 5/1/2015 Page 2 of 6 EMI EME� fomqlmspzmim{ammsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2015/16 All Routes Peak Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy RTA-Hemet Total RTA-Jurupa Total RTA-LakeEl Total RTA-MurDAR Total RTA-MV DAR Total RTA-No/Co Total RTA-Perris Total RTA-RivDAR Total RTA-Sun Ci Total RTA-TaxiBB Total RTA-TaxiGT Total RTA-TaxiHe Total RTA-TaxDu Total RTA-TaxiLE Total RTA-TaxiMu Total RTA-TaxiMV Total RTA-TaxiNC Total RTA-TaxiPe Total RTA-TaxiRi Total RTA-TaxiSC Total SL-220 Total 84,262 1,037,265 29,183.0 37,255.0 511,946.0 656,008.0 $2,034,131 $309,410 $1,724,721 15,611 192,171 7,738.0 10,030.0 146,938.0 185,540.0 $539,361 $56,629 $482,732 17,325 213,271 8,151.0 10,346.0 165,695.0 208,353.0 $568,144 $63,886 $504,258 40,010 492,523 20,421.0 25,155.0 377,028.0 473,675.0 $1,423,394 $147,037 $1,276,357 85,538 1,052,973 35,422.0 43,885.0 612,587.0 751,200.0 $2,469,018 $308,946 $2,160,072 24,755 304,734 9,343.0 11,562.0 169,112.0 213,252.0 $651,250 $100,921 $550,329 39,376 484,719 19,264.0 23,521.0 408,230.0 479,586.0 $1,342,717 $142,588 $1,200,129 78,860 970,767 36,664.0 45,144.0 728,555.0 901,779.0 $2,555,559 $301,955 $2,253,604 19,968 245,806 10,087.0 12,695.0 196,348.0 237,459.0 $703,060 $68,536 $634,524 1,045 12,864 411.0 411.0 15,887.0 15,887.0 $51,346 $4,014 $47,332 1,200 14,772 773.0 773.0 19,523.0 19,523.0 $65,197 $5,096 $60,101 2,646 32,572 1,704.0 1,704.0 43,764.0 43,764.0 $145,934 $8,958 $136,976 780 9,602 507.0 507.0 10,050.0 10,050.0 $34,415 $3,004 $31,411 1,577 19,413 1,018.0 1,018.0 26,596.0 26,596.0 $88,547 $6,725 $81,822 1,784 21,961 1,146.0 1,146.0 27,937.0 27,937.0 $93,613 $7,315 $86,298 1,570 19,327 1,013.0 1,013.0 20,117.0 20,117.0 $68,879 $5,864 $63,015 1,889 23,254 1,221.0 1,221.0 29,856.0 29,856.0 $100,016 $7,670 $92,346 2,294 28,239 1,483.0 1,483.0 29,098.0 29,098.0 $99,764 $8,541 $91,223 3,707 45,633 2,394.0 2,394.0 50,468.0 50,468.0 $171,648 $15,501 $156,147 804 9,897 519.0 519.0 10,877.0 10,877.0 $37,020 $2,543 $34,477 $103,700 $103,700 Service Provider Totals 168 10,305,607 73,477,011 795,419.0 894,624.0 12,718,415.0 15,481,742.0 $69,079,587 $15,063,536 $54,016,051 TransTrack Manager"' 5/1/2015 Page 3 of 6 EMI EME� IiN � fomqlmspirdim{nmmsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2015/16 All Routes Route # Day Type Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile Cost Per Passenger Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy Per Passenger Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Subsidy Per Revenue Hour Subsidy Per Revenue Mile Passengers Passengers Per Hour Per Mile RTA-0 RTA-1 RTA-10 RTA-11 RTA-12 RTA-13 RTA-14 RTA-15 RTA-16/16E RTA-18 RTA-19 RTA-19C RTA-20 RTA-202 RTA-202D RTA-204D RTA-206D RTA-208 RTA-208D RTA-21 RTA-210 RTA-210D RTA-212 RTA-216 RTA-217 RTA-217D RTA-22 RTA-23 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total $101.88 $9.11 $3.75 24.05% $2.85 $0.53 $77.38 $101.88 $9.20 $6.43 14.28% $5.51 $1.02 $87.34 $101.88 $8.84 $5.24 18.30% $4.28 $0.79 $83.23 $101.86 $8.63 $5.18 17.30% $4.28 $0.80 $84.23 $102.05 $8.89 $5.01 16.91% $4.16 $0.77 $84.79 $101.86 $7.94 $5.84 15.47% $4.94 $0.92 $86.10 $101.88 $8.58 $5.67 15.76% $4.78 $0.89 $85.82 $101.88 $8.62 $3.86 22.99% $2.97 $0.55 $78.45 $101.86 $8.14 $5.02 17.32% $4.15 $0.77 $84.21 $101.90 $7.80 $4.79 20.51% $3.81 $0.71 $81.00 $69.78 $4.69 $8.58 8.89% $7.82 $1.18 $63.57 $102.26 $6.60 $6.98 13.18% $6.06 $1.13 $88.77 $69.90 $2.61 $18.68 11.38% $16.55 $0.70 $61.95 $107.02 $3.24 $16.28 12.94% $14.17 $2.63 $93.17 $101.94 $4.46 $10.71 15.22% $9.08 $0.48 $86.42 $101.93 $4.35 $10.02 27.03% $7.31 $0.39 $74.38 $70.12 $3.15 $16.91 12.09% $14.87 $0.64 $61.64 $101.92 $4.19 $12.37 10.85% $11.03 $0.59 $90.86 $101.86 $6.94 $7.27 13.69% $6.28 $1.17 $87.91 $69.90 $3.17 $6.93 38.95% $4.23 $0.18 $42.68 $101.97 $8.54 $19.37 13.08% $16.83 $0.89 $88.62 $70.08 $3.14 $12.90 13.84% $11.11 $0.48 $60.38 $101.89 $4.11 $8.28 56.71% $3.58 $0.18 $44.10 $69.92 $2.29 $17.05 11.32% $15.12 $0.65 $62.00 $101.94 $3.84 $13.87 13.92% $11.94 $0.63 $87.74 $102.06 $5.67 $5.39 17.92% $4.43 $0.37 $83.77 $70.03 $5.32 $11.22 8.91% $10.22 $1.49 $63.79 $6.92 $7.89 $7.22 $7.14 $7.39 $6.71 $7.23 $6.64 $6.73 $6.20 $4.27 $5.73 $2.32 $2.82 $3.78 $3.17 $2.77 $3.73 $5.99 $1.94 $7.42 $2.70 $1.78 $2.03 $3.30 $4.66 $4.85 27.2 15.8 19.4 19.7 20.4 17.4 18.0 26.4 20.3 21.3 8.1 14.6 3.7 6.6 9.5 10.2 4.1 8.2 14.0 10.1 5.3 5.4 12.3 4.1 7.4 18.9 6.2 2.43 1.43 1.69 1.67 1.77 1.36 1.51 2.23 1.62 1.63 0.55 0.95 0.14 0.20 0.42 0.43 0.19 0.34 0.95 0.46 0.44 0.24 0.50 0.13 0.28 1.05 0.47 TransTrack Manager"' 5/1/2015 Page 4 of 6 EMI EME� IiN � fomql.oepirdim{ammsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2015/16 All Routes Route # Day Type Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile RTA-24 RTA-26 RTA-27 RTA-29 RTA-3 RTA-30 RTA-31 RTA-32 RTA-33 RTA-35 RTA-3D RTA-40 RTA-41C RTA-41D RTA-42 RTA-49 RTA-50 RTA-51 RTA-52 RTA-55 RTA-61 RTA-7 RTA-74 RTA-79 RTA-794 RTA-8 RTA-Ba/Bea RTA-GT DAR Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total $69.90 $71.12 $101.95 $101.87 $68.86 $70.12 $69.90 $69.90 $69.92 $69.92 $103.19 $69.91 $69.89 $101.94 $69.91 $101.87 $69.93 $70.02 $71.14 $69.53 $70.09 $69.88 $69.96 $69.91 $69.88 $69.67 $69.71 $5.09 $3.65 $5.21 $6.42 $5.37 $6.61 $4.12 $7.03 $5.22 $3.28 $8.26 $4.24 $3.82 $6.44 $4.73 $8.10 $10.76 $6.65 $7.66 $5.36 $4.49 $5.17 $2.92 $4.06 $4.91 $2.96 $3.27 $9.47 $14.24 $6.24 $5.90 $11.57 $8.41 $6.68 $4.46 $6.94 $7.61 $11.79 $9.28 $9.63 $6.19 $5.57 $3.85 $41.39 $2.68 $4.31 $3.10 $11.06 $5.49 $4.61 $8.18 $4.48 $31.43 $36.03 11.3296 6.3996 16.5296 16.2196 9.8996 11.7996 14.7596 21.4896 13.3696 12.8396 8.2096 11.4196 9.7196 15.8496 16.1496 24.8896 98.5496 97.1296 21.0996 21.4396 9.5596 18.3196 21.5796 12.9896 100.0096 24.3196 8.5696 8.4896 $8.40 $13.33 $5.21 $4.95 $10.43 $7.42 $5.69 $3.50 $6.01 $6.63 $10.82 $8.22 $8.69 $5.21 $4.67 $2.89 $0.60 $0.08 $3.40 $2.44 $10.00 $4.48 $3.61 $7.12 $3.39 $28.74 $32.97 $1.22 $1.91 $0.44 $0.92 $1.54 $1.06 $0.82 $0.51 $0.86 $0.95 $2.01 $1.18 $1.27 $0.97 $0.67 $0.54 $0.33 $0.04 $1.86 $1.33 $1.43 $0.65 $0.52 $1.02 $0.50 $2.33 $2.68 $61.98 $66.58 $85.10 $85.35 $62.05 $61.85 $59.58 $54.88 $60.57 $60.94 $94.72 $61.93 $63.10 $85.79 $58.62 $76.52 $1.02 $2.02 $56.13 $54.62 $63.39 $57.08 $54.87 $60.84 $52.89 $63.70 $63.80 $4.51 $3.42 $4.35 $5.38 $4.84 $5.83 $3.52 $5.52 $4.52 $2.86 $7.58 $3.75 $3.45 $5.42 $3.96 $6.08 $0.16 $0.19 $6.05 $4.21 $4.06 $4.22 $2.29 $3.53 $3.72 $2.70 $2.99 7.4 5.0 16.3 17.3 6.0 8.3 10.5 15.7 10.1 9.2 8.8 7.5 7.3 16.5 12.6 26.5 1.7 26.1 16.5 22.4 6.3 12.7 15.2 8.5 15.6 2.2 1.9 0.54 0.26 0.83 1.09 0.46 0.79 0.62 1.58 0.75 0.43 0.70 0.46 0.40 1.04 0.85 2.10 0.26 2.48 1.78 1.73 0.41 0.94 0.63 0.50 1.10 0.09 0.09 TransTrack Manager"' 5/1/2015 Page 5 of 6 EMI EME� fvmqlmspzmim{ammsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2015/16 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile RTA-Hemet Total $69.70 $3.97 $24.14 15.210/0 $20.47 $1.66 $59.10 $3.37 2.9 0.16 RTA-Jurupa Total $69.70 $3.67 $34.55 10.49% $30.92 $2.51 $62.38 $3.29 2.0 0.11 RTA-LakeEl Total $69.70 $3.43 $32.79 11.24% $29.11 $2.36 $61.86 $3.04 2.1 0.10 RTA-MurDAR Total $69.70 $3.78 $35.58 10.33% $31.90 $2.59 $62.50 $3.39 2.0 0.11 RTA-MV DAR Total $69.70 $4.03 $28.86 12.51% $25.25 $2.05 $60.98 $3.53 2.4 0.14 RTA-No/Co Total $69.70 $3.85 $26.31 15.49% $22.23 $1.81 $58.90 $3.25 2.6 0.15 RTA-Perris Total $69.70 $3.29 $34.10 10.61% $30.48 $2.48 $62.30 $2.94 2.0 0.10 RTA-RivDAR Total $69.70 $3.51 $32.41 11.81% $28.58 $2.32 $61.47 $3.09 2.2 0.11 RTA-Sun Ci Total $69.70 $3.58 $35.21 9.74% $31.78 $2.58 $62.91 $3.23 2.0 0.10 RTA-TaxiBB Total $124.93 $3.23 $49.13 7.81% $45.29 $3.68 $115.16 $2.98 2.5 0.07 RTA-TaxiGT Total $84.34 $3.34 $54.33 7.81% $50.08 $4.07 $77.75 $3.08 1.6 0.06 RTA-TaxiHe Total $85.64 $3.33 $55.15 6.13% $51.77 $4.21 $80.38 $3.13 1.6 0.06 RTA-TaxDu Total $67.88 $3.42 $44.12 8.72% $40.27 $3.27 $61.95 $3.13 1.5 0.08 RTA-TaxiLE Total $86.98 $3.33 $56.15 7.59% $51.88 $4.21 $80.38 $3.08 1.5 0.06 RTA-TaxiMu Total $81.69 $3.35 $52.47 7.81% $48.37 $3.93 $75.30 $3.09 1.6 0.06 RTA-TaxiMV Total $68.00 $3.42 $43.87 8.51% $40.14 $3.26 $62.21 $3.13 1.5 0.08 RTA-TaxiNC Total $81.91 $3.35 $52.95 7.66% $48.89 $3.97 $75.63 $3.09 1.5 0.06 RTA-TaxiPe Total $67.27 $3.43 $43.49 8.56% $39.77 $3.23 $61.51 $3.14 1.5 0.08 RTA-TaxiRi Total $71.70 $3.40 $46.30 9.03% $42.12 $3.42 $65.22 $3.09 1.5 0.07 RTA-TaxiSC Total $71.33 $3.40 $46.04 6.86% $42.88 $3.48 $66.43 $3.17 1.5 0.07 SL-220 Total Service Provider Totals $86.85 $5.43 $6.70 21.80% $5.24 $0.74 $67.91 $4.25 13.0 0.81 TransTrack Manager"' 5/1/2015 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2014/15 - FY 2016/17 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2015/16 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Route # I Route Class I Route Description I Cities/Communities Served Connections Directly Operated Fixed Routes: 1 Regional From UCR and Downtown Riverside to Galleria at Tyler and Corona primarily via University Ave and Magnolia Ave Riverside, UCR campus area, Arlington, Home Gardens, Corona Metrolink, Corona Cruiser, Omnitrans, SunLine 3' Local 10th St and Belle Ave in Corona via Main St and Hamner Ave to the Corona Transit Center, Norco College, continuing to Eastvale and Jurupa Valley via Limonite Ave, Pats Ranch Rd, and Hamner Ave Riverside, La Sierra, Norco, Corona, Eastvale, Mira Loma Metrolink, Corona Cruiser 10 Local From Big Springs St on Riverside's Northside to Galleria at Tyler primarily via Brockton St, Blaine St, Victoria Ave and Lincoln Ave Riverside, UCR campus area, Casa Blanca, La Sierra, eastside of Riverside Omnitrans, SunLine 11 Local Circulator between Moreno Valley Mall and March Air Reserve Base primarily via Frederick St, Ironwood Ave, Heacock St and JFK Dr Moreno Valley, March Joint Powers Authority SunLine 12 Local From Stephens Ave and Center St on Riverside's Northside, through Downtown, then to Pierce St at Magnolia Ave via Magnolia Ave, California Ave, and Jurupa Ave Riverside, La Sierra, and northside of Riverside Omnitrans, SunLine 13 Local From Spruce Stand Atlanta Ave to Galleria at Tyler in Riverside via MLK Blvd, Magnolia Ave, Central Ave, Arlington Ave, Colorado Ave, and Tyler St Riverside, Hunter Park-Eastside, Arlanza and La Sierra Metrolink', Omnitrans, SunLine 14 Regional From Galleria at Tyler to Downtown Riverside via Indiana Ave and Brockton Ave, then to Loma Linda VA Hospital via I-215 and I-10 Riverside, Casa Blanca, Highgrove, Colton, Loma Linda Omnitrans, SunLine 15 Local From Downtown Riverside to Galleria at Tyler to Magnolia Ave and Merced St via Magnolia Ave, Arlington Ave, La Sierra Ave, Tyler St, and Indiana Ave Riverside, Arlanza and La Sierra Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine, OCTA 16 Local From Moreno Valley Mall to Downtown Riverside via Day St, Sycamore Canyon Blvd, Box Springs Rd, and University Ave Moreno Valley, Riverside, Canyon Crest, Riverside Eastside, UCR campus area Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 18 Local From Moreno Valley College to Moreno Valley Mall and Heacock via Sunnymead Ranch, Cottonwood St and schools along Frederick St, Perris Blvd, Pigeon Pass Rd, and Kitching St Moreno Valley SunLine 19' Regional From Moreno Valley Mall to the Perris Station Transit Center via Perris Blvd and Sunnymead Blvd with service to distribution centers at Indian St and Morgan St, Perris Fairgrounds, and Moreno Valley College Moreno Valley, Perris Metrolink', SunLine 20 Regional From Magnolia Ave and Jurupa Ave in Riverside to Moreno Valley College via Central Ave, Alessandro Blvd, Moreno Beach Dr, and Iris St Riverside, Moreno Valley, Mission Grove 21 Local From Galleria at Tyler in Riverside to Fontana and Country Village in Mira Loma via Van Buren Blvd and Mission Blvd Jurupa, Glen Avon, Pedley, Riverside Omnitrans 22 Regional From the Lake Elsinore Outlet Mall to Downtown Riverside via Hwy 74, Old Elsinore Rd, and Alessandro Blvd Riverside, Woodcrest, Mead Valley, Perris, Meadowbrook, Lake Elsinore Metrolink', Omnitrans, SunLine 27 Regional From Florida Ave and Lincoln Ave in East Hemet to Galleria at Tyler in Riverside via Florida Ave, 215 Fwy, and Van Buren Blvd Riverside, Woodcrest, Perris, Menifee, Hemet, Valle Vista Metrolink' 29 Regional From Downtown Riverside to Hamner Ave and Limonite Ave in Eastvale via Rubidoux Blvd and Limonite Ave Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Riverside Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 41 1 Regional From the Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley with stops at Moreno Valley College and Riverside County Medical Center Moreno Valley, Perris, Mead Valley 49 Regional From Downtown Riverside to Country Village via Mission Blvd Jurupa Valley, Riverside Omnitrans, SunLine 202' Express From the Murrieta Walmart and Promenade Mall in Temecula to Oceanside Transit Center Murrieta, Temecula, Fallbrook, Oceanside Metrolink, NCTD 204' Express From UCR to Montclair TransCenter via Downtown Riverside, Country Village, and Ontario Mills Mall RiversideJurupa ValleyOntarioMontclair , , , Metrolink, Omnitrans, Foothill Transit, SunLine 206' Express From the Promenade Mall in Temecula to Corona Metrolink Station via Fwy 15 with stops in Murrieta, the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center, Temescal Canyon, and Dos Lagos Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Corona Metrolink, Corona Cruiser 208' Express From the Promenade Mall in Temecula to the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station and downtown area via I-215 with stops in Murrieta, Menifee, Perris, and Moreno Valley Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Perris, Riverside, Moreno Valley Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 210 Express From Beaumont to Downtown Riverside with stops in Moreno Valley and the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station BeaumontMoreno ValleyRiverside , , Metrolink, Pass Transit, Omnitrans, SunLine 212' Express From Hemet and San Jacinto to Downtown Riverside with stops at Perris and UCR San JacintoHemetPerrisRiverside , , , Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 216 Express From Downtown Riverside to the Village at Orange via 91 Fwy and 55 Fwy with stops at the Galleria at Tyler and Corona Transit Center Riverside, Corona, Orange Metrolink, Omnitrans, OCTA, Corona Cruiser 217' Express From San Jacinto and Hemet to Temecula and Escondido via Winchester Rd (State Hwy 79) and 1-15 Hemet, San Jacinto, Temecula, Escondido NCTD, San Diego MTS This route has selected trips that are/will be both directly operated and contract operated. 2 Rural areas are those with less than 50,000 in population. 'This route will serve the Perrris Valley Line Metrolink service commencing in fall 2015. Revised 4/2/2015 Table 3A Individual Route Description RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2014/15 - FY 2016/17 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2015/16 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Route # Route Class Route Description I Cities/Communities Served Connections Contracted Fixed Routes: 3' Local 10th St and Belle Ave in Corona via Main St and Hamner Ave to the Corona Transit Center, Norco College, continuing to Eastvale and Jurupa Valley via Limonite Ave, Pats Ranch Rd, and Hamner Ave Corona, Norco, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley Metrolink, Corona Cruiser 7 Local Lake Elsinore local with stops at Lake Elsinore Outlet Center, Downtown Lake Elsinore, Senior Center, Walmart shopping Center, Inland Valley Medical Center in Wildomar Lake Elsinore, Lakeland Village, Sedco Hills, Wildomar 8 Local From Lake Elsinore Outlet Center to Walmart on Railroad Canyon Rd via Grand Ave, Central St and Palomar St in Wildomar, and Canyon Estates Dr Lake Elsinore, Sedco Hills, Wildomar 19 ' Regional From Perris Station Transit Center to Exceed Facility on Trumble Rd and from the Perris Station Transit Center to Perris Fairgrounds via Perris Blvd Perris 23 Local From Inland Valley Medical Center in Wildomar through Murrieta to County Center Dr in Temecula Wildomar, Murrieta, Temecula 24 Local Temecula local route with stops at County Center Dr, Old Town, Library, Pechanga Resort, and Temecula Valley Hospital Temecula, Pechanga Community 26 Local New route. Local circulator serving Moreno Valley/March Field Metrolink Station and Moreno Valley Mall via Van Buren Blvd, Trautwein Rd, Alessandro Blvd, Sycamore Canyon Blvd, and Eucalyptus Ave Moreno Valley, March Joint Powers Authority, Riverside Metrolink' 30 Local Perris local circulator serving the Perris Transit Center, Walmart, and central part of the community Perris Metrolink' 31 Rural Service from Banning to Hemet Valley Mall via Lamb Canyon, State St, and Mt San Jacinto Community College Banning, Beaumont, Gilman Hot Springs, San Jacinto, Hemet pass Transit 32 Local From Hemet Valley Mall to Mt. San Jacinto College via Downtown San Jacinto and San Jacinto Ave San Jacinto, Hemet 33 Local From Super-Walmart on Sanderson Ave and the Hemet Valley Mall in western Hemet to Standford St and Thornton Ave in east Hemet Hemet, Valle Vista 35 Regional From Banning to Moreno Valley Mall with stops at Walmart on Moreno Beach Dr, senior center, and Riverside County Medical Center Banning, Beaumont, Moreno Valley Pass Transit, SunLine 40 Regional From Walmart in Lake Elsinore to Cherry Hills Blvd in Menifee with stops in Canyon Lake and Quail Valley Menifee, Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore 41 ' Regional From the Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley with stops at Moreno Valley College and Riverside County Medical Center Moreno Valley, Perris, Mead Valley 42 Local From the Hemet Valley Mall to Soboba Casino in San Jacinto via Kirby St, Cottonwood Ave, Santa Fe Ave, and East Main St Hemet, San Jacinto 50 Trolley Riverside downtown Jury Trolley Service Downtown Riverside, RCC Campus area 51 Trolley Crest Cruiser, a UCR to Canyon Crest circulator via Chicago Ave, Central Ave, and Canyon Crest Dr Riverside, UCR campus area SunLine 52 Local New route. Local circulator serving Hunter Park Metrolink Station and UCR via Iowa Ave, Blaine St, and University Ave Riverside Metrolink' 55 Trolley Temecula Trolley route, connecting Harveston community to schools, shops, and other RTA routes Temecula 61 Regional From Cherry Hills Blvd and Bradley Rd in Menifee to the Promenade Mall area in Temecula with stops at MSJC Menifee campus, Loma Linda University Medical Center - Murrieta, and County Center Dr Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee Metrolink' 74 Regional From San Jacinto and Hemet to Menifee and Perris, serving MSJC San Jacinto campus, Hemet Valley Mall, Winchester, MSJC Menifee campus, and Perris Station Transit Center San Jacinto, Hemet, Winchester, Menifee, Perris Metrolink' 79 Regional From the Hemet Valley Mall to Old Town Temecula via Winchester Rd (State Hwy 79). Also serves County Center Dr, Promenade Mall, and Temecula City Hall Hemet, Winchester, French Valley, Murrieta, Temecula 202' Express From the Murrieta Walmart and Promenade Mall in Temecula to Oceanside Transit Center Murrieta, Temecula, Fallbrook, Oceanside Metrolink, NCTD (Bus, Coaster Rail, Sprinter Rail) 204' Express From UCR to Montclair TransCenter via Downtown Riverside, Country Village, and Ontario Mills Mall RiversideJurupa ValleyOntarioMontclair , , , Metrolink, Omnitrans, Foothill Transit, SunLine 208' Express From the Promenade Mall in Temecula to the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station and downtown area via 1-215 with stops in Murrieta, Menifee, Perris, and Moreno Valley Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Perris, Riverside, Moreno Valley Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 210' Express From Beaumont to Downtown Riverside with stops in Moreno Valley and the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station BeaumontMoreno ValleyRiverside , , Metrolink, Pass Transit, Omnitrans, SunLine 212' Express From Hemet and San Jacinto to Downtown Riverside with stops at Perris and UCR San JacintoHemetPerrisRiverside , , , Metrolink, Omnitrans, SunLine 217' Express From San Jacinto and Hemet to Temecula and Escondido via Winchester Rd (State Hwy 79) and 1-15 San Jacinto, Hemet, Temecula, Escondido NCTD, San Diego MTS ' This route has selected trips hat are/will be both directly operated and contract operated. ' This route will serve the Perrris Valley Line Metrolink service commencing in fall 2015. Revised 4/2/2015 Table 3A Individual Route Description RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2014/15 - FY 2016/17 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2015/16 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Route # Route Class Route Description i Cities/Communities Served Connections Contracted Paratransit Routes: Banning/Beaumont Origin -to -Destination Banning and Beaumont Lake Elsinore Origin -to -Destination Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, Wildomar, Quail Valley Highgrove/Loma Linda Origin -to -Destination Grand Terrace, Highgrove, Loma Linda, Colton Hemet Origin -to -Destination Hemet, Homeland, Romoland, San Jacinto, Valle Vista, Winchester Jurupa Origin -to -Destination Glen Avon, Bel!town, Jurupa, Pedley, Rubidoux, Mira Loma (Country Village) Moreno Valley Origin -to -Destination Moreno Valley, March Air Reserve Base Murrieta/Temecula Origin -to -Destination Murrieta, Temecula Corona/Norco Origin -to -Destination Corona, Norco Perris Origin -to -Destination Perris, Mead Valley, Nuevo Riverside Origin -to -Destination Riverside, Canyon Crest, Arnold Heights, Orangecrest, Woodcrest Sun City Origin -to -Destination Sun City, Menifee Revised 4/2/2015 Table 3A Individual Route Description Riverside Transit Agency FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Measure A Operating Assistance Section 5307 - Riv- San Bernardino Section 5307 - Murrieta/ Temecula/ Menifee Section 5307 - Hemet z Section 5307 Carryover Section 53103 Section 5311 4 Section 5339 Bus & Bus Facilities 5304 Planning Grant Section 5316 JARC , Section 5317 New Freedom Prop 1 B PTMISEA Prop 1 B Security Farebox Other Revenue Operating Assistance 38,257,820 34,054,047 1,824,000 1,800,000 579,773 Operating Assistance - CTSA 800,000 800,000 GASB 43/45 ARC 1,350,000 1,350,000 OCTA 794 146,032 146,032 CommuterLink 212 & 217 (JARC) 1 970,000 417,000 417,000 136,000 Extended Fixed Route Service (JARC)' 620,000 256,600 22,400 209,000 70,000 62,000 Travel Training.' 3 413,000 22,500 300,500 90,000 Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 6,531,250 1,306,250 4,500,000 725,000 Capital Cost of Contracting 6,906,250 1,381,250 1,400,000 3,000,000 500,000 625,000 DAR Plus 286,812 217,131 41,000 28,681 First Mile Last Mile 195,000 23,400 171,600 Farebox (Cash, Tix, Passes) 11,573,423 11,573,423 Interest Income 20,000 20,000 Advertising Revenue 15,000 15,000 CNG Sales 185,000 185,000 RINS/LCFS Credits 150,000 150,000 Medi-Cal Reimbursement 600,000 300,000 300,000 Wentworth Bldg Lease 60,000 60,000 Subtotal: Operating $69,079,587 $39,328,178 $0 $2,833,432 $6,526,000 $3,000,000 $2,300,000 $1,350,000 $300,500 $579,773 $0 $171,600 $70,000 $90,000 $0 $0 $11,800,104 $730,000 Revenue Vehicles - (9) Expansion COFR FY16-1 1,726,740 1,726,740 Revenue Vehicles - (16) COFR - Repl FY16-2 3,228,040 484,206 2,743,834 Revenue Vehicles - (29) DAR - Repl FY16-3 2,713,820 407,073 2,306,747 Non -Revenue Vehicles - (22) Support Vehicles FY16-4 546,480 109,296 437,184 Non -Revenue Vehicle-(1) Travel Training Car FY16-4 23,000 23,000 Associated Transit Improvements FY16-5 1,100,000 220,000 802,000 46,000 32,000 Capitalized Tire Lease FY16-6 386,857 77,371 309,486 Maintenance/Support Equipment FY16-7 217,100 43,420 173,680 Facility Maintenance FY16-8 1,017,530 203,506 814,024 Information Systems FY16-9 329,120 65,824 263,296 Bus & Bus Facilities Projects 5 FY16-10 2,053,525 410,705 1,642,820 Hemet UZA Bus & Bus Facilities Projects 6 FY16-11 422,356 84,471 337,885 RapidLink Stops / Shelters 4 FY16-12 255,219 255,219 Downtown Riverside Stop Improvements -Cap & Trade Low Carbon Transit Ops Program FY16-13 58,822 58,822 Ops & Facilities Security Projects' FY16-14 911,470 911,470 Ops/Maint Facility FY16-15 12,045,649 12,045,649 Subtotal: Capital $27.035.728 SO $4,087,831 SO S2.362.694 $3,226,810 S2.338.747 SO $23.000 $0 51.980.705 $0 $0 $0 $12,045,649 $911,470 $0 S58,822 Total: Operating & Capital $96,115,315 $39,328,178 $4,087,831I $2,833,432 $8,888,694 $6,226,810 $4,638,747 $1,350,000 S323,500 $579,773 $1,980,705 S171,600 $70,000 $90,000 $12,045,649 $911,470 $11,800,104 $788,822 JARC/NF funds reflect funding from current executed grants. 2 5307 estimated carryover from FY15 grant CA-90-Z227. 3 5310 funds amount for Travel Training includes the Toll Credits amount as local match. 4 STA amount required as local match for existing 5309 BRT grants. 5 Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities funding is FY2014 apportionment only. (60020-LA UZA: $3,743; 60420-Riv/San UZA: $1,144,762; 61320-Temecula UZA: $494,315). 6 FY12/13 Apportionment 7 FY13/14 Apportionment Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-1 PROJECT NAME Expansion Revenue Vehicles for Contract Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (9) expansion CNG revenue vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Expansion vehicles required to run new service to support the Perris Valley Line and other service expansion needs. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Jul-15 Completion Date Dec-16 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 S TA $ 1,726,740 $ Total $ 1,726,740 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-2 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contract Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (14) replacement CNG revenue vehicles and (2) trolleys for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for contract operated fixed route service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Nov-15 Completion Date Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 2,743,834 S TA $ 484,206 Total $ 3,228,040 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z227* RIV140825 FY15-1 STA (12) COFR vehicles $ 2,438,640 As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-3 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Demand Response Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (29) replacement unleaded revenue vehicles for use on demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for demand response service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Nov-15 Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTE Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 2,306, 747 STA $ 407,073 Total $ 2,713,820 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Y954 RIV110819 FY12-3 STA (17) DAR Vehicles $ 297,468 CA-90-Z227* RIV140826 FY15-2 STA (26) DAR Vehicles $ 1,886,870 Total $ 2,184, 338 * As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/6-4 PROJECT NAME Support Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of replacement and expansion support vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replacement of (14) support cars that have met their useful life requirement and expansion of (8) support cars and (1) car for the Travel Training department. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Nov-15 Completion Date Dec-17 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 437,184 STA $ 109,296 Sec 5310 + Toll Credits $ 23,000 Total $ 569,480 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z227* RIV140827 FY15-4 STA (10) Support Vehicles $ 735,480 * As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/6-5 PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Nov-15 Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 880,000 STA $ 220,000 Total $ 1,100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z034 RIV120823 FY13-6 STA Assoc. Transit Improvements $ 26,501 CA-90-Z128 RIV130604 FY14-5 STA Assoc. Transit Improvements $ 250,000 CA-90-Z227* RIV140830 FY15-6 STA Assoc. Transit Improvements $ 150,000 Total $ 426,501 * As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/6-6 PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected and replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Nov-15 Dec-16 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 309,486 STA $ 77,371 Total $ 386,857 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z128 RIV130603 FY14-4 STA Capitalized Tire Lease $ 46,466 CA-90-Z227* RIV140831 FY15-7 STA Capitalized Tire Lease $ 302,099 Total $ 348,565 As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/6-7 PROJECT NAME Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of support equipment items including, but not limited to, shop air compressors, scissors lift, mobility devices for training, portable crane, hand jacks. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Nov-15 Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTE Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 173,680 STA $ 43,420 Total $ 217,100 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z128 RIV130605 FY14-6 STA Support Equipment $ 8,952 CA-90-Z227* RIV140832 FY15-8 STA Support Equipment $ 98,815 Total $ 107,767 As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-8 PROJECT NAME Facility Maintenance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance of facilities in Riverside, Hemet and Corona. Project may include but is not limited to furniture, flooring, paint, plumbing, electrical, lighting, HVAC, roll up doors, parking lot and concrete. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Facilities require routine maintenance to keep them in optimal condition. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Nov-15 Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 814,024 S TA $ 203,506 Total $ 1,017,530 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-04-0215 SGR RIV110824 FY12 LTF Facility Maintenance $ 60,132 CA-90-Z227* RIV140833 FY15-9 STA Facility Maintenance $ 332,618 Total $ 392,750 * As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-9 PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project includes but is not limited to the purchase of computers, printers, servers, audio-visual equipment, copiers, software, and mobile data terminals. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers and software to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Nov-15 Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5307 $ 263,296 STA $ 65,824 Total $ 329,120 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-90-Z034 RIV120825 FY13-8 STA Information Systems $ 13,331 CA-90-Z227* RIV140834 FY15-10 STA Information Systems $ 467,200 Total $ 480,531 * As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant not yet awarded. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-10 FTIP ID #:RIV140835 PROJECT NAME Bus and Bus Facilities Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION Projects may include purchase of buses and bus -related equipment, rehabilitation and maintenance of buses, bus stops and stations, facilities and infrastructure. Funding is for the FY14 apportionment for Riverside -San Bernardino, Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee, and Los Angeles UZA's. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses, related equipment and bus -related facilities. Purchase and install infrastructure. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Apr-15 Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5339 $ 1,642,820 STA $ 410,705 Total $ 2,053,525 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* None* RIV140835 FY15-11 STA Bus & Bus Facilities $ 1,975,203 * As of 4/20/15 - FY15 grant application not yet submitted. Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-11 PROJECT NAME Bus and Bus Facilities Projects — Hemet UZA PROJECT DESCRIPTION Projects may include purchase of buses and bus -related equipment, rehabilitation and maintenance of buses, bus stops and stations, facilities and infrastructure within the Hemet UZA. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses, related equipment and bus -related facilities. Purchase and install infrastructure. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Nov-15 Dec-18 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Sec 5339 $ 337,885 STA $ 84,471 Total $ 422,356 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-12 PROJECT NAME RapidLink Stops & Shelters PROJECT DESCRIPTION Stops and shelters infrastructure for the RapidLink service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Existing 5309 grant for BRT Signage & Shelters requires local match in order to expend the remaining balance. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Mar-15 Completion Date Dec-17 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 S TA $ 255,219 Total $ 255,219 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* CA-03-0703 (FY05) None BRT Signage & Shelters $ 196,322 * As of 4/20/15 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-13 PROJECT NAME Downtown Riverside Stop Improvements and Vine Street Enhancements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design and construction of stops throughout downtown Riverside, including improvement to Vine Street layover location. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Existing 5309 grants and local match for Riverside Downtown transit facility will be supplemented by Cap & Trade Low Carbon Transit Operations Program funds. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Mar-15 Dec-17 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Cap & Trade Low Carbon $ 58,822 Transit Ops Program Total $ 58,822 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-14 PROJECT NAME Operations and Facilities Security Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Safety and security purchases for use at Agency facilities and on Agency vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Projects will improve and maintain the overall agency safety and security. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-15 Mar-17 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Prop 18 CTSGP $ 911,470 $ - Total $ 911,470 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance* Prop 18 CTSGP None Ops & Facility Security $ 2,733,388 As of 4/20/15 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY16-15 PROJECT NAME Operations and Maintenance Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design, land acquisition and construction of the new Operations and Maintenance Facility. First phase of the project includes agency needs assessment. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current base in Riverside is at capacity. The agency needs to identify a new location to accommodate growth. Prop 18 PTMISEA available funding allocated to RTA will be applied toward this project. Additional funding will be required. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-16 Dec-21 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2016 Prop 18 PTMISEA $ 12, 045, 649 $ - Total $ 12,045,649 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance None Riverside Transit Agency FY 2016/17 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Measure A Operating Assistance Section 5307 - Riv-San Bernardino Section 5307 - Temecula/ Murrieta Section 5307 - Hemet/San Jacinto Section 5339 Bus & Bus Facilities Section 5310 Section 5311 CMAQ Farebox Other Revenue FY 2016/2017 Operating Assistance 41,036,201 35,956,201 2,700,000 1,800,000 580,000 GASB 43/45 ARC 1,400,000 1,400,000 Route 1 Ltd Operations 1,369,310 342,327 1,026,983 PVL Operations - Cap & Trade Low Carbon Transit Operations Program 2,192,291 1,213,415 518,466 460,410 91 Fwy Route Operating Assistance (TIFIA) 750,000 750,000 OCTA 794 153,300 153,300 CommuterLink 212 & 217 (JARC) 1,030,050 437,771 437,771 154,508 Extended Fixed Route Service (JARC) 656,250 295,312 295,313 65,625 Travel Training 472,874 472,874 Capitalized Preventative Maintenance 6,625,000 1,325,000 3,600,000 1,700,000 Capital Cost of Contracting 7,125,000 1,425,000 2,900,000 2,800,000 DAR Plus 300,000 240,000 30,000 30,000 Farebox (Cash, Tix, Passes) 11,331,401 11,331,401 Interest Income 20,000 20,000 Advertising Revenue 15,000 15,000 CNG Sales 185,000 185,000 RINS/LCFS Credits 200,000 200,000 Medi-Cal Reimbursement 600,000 300,000 300,000 Wentworth Bldg Lease 61,800 61,800 Subtotal: FY16/170perating _ $75,523,477 $42,935,026 $0 $3,633,300 $7,233,084 $4,500,000 $1,800,000 $0 $472,874 $580,000 $1,026,983 $12,100,000 $1,242,210 Revenue Vehicles - (10) COFR Repl FY17-1 1,983,400 297,510 1,685,890 Revenue Vehicles - (33) DAR Repl FY17-2 3,195,060 479,259 2,715,801 Non -Revenue Vehicles - (11) Support Vehicles FY17-3 284,580 56,916 227,664 Fare Collection System FY17-4 1,290,600 258,120 1,032,480 Associated Transit Improvements FY17-5 1,000,000 200,000 720,000 47,000 33,000 Capital Maintenance Spares FY17-6 525,105 105,021 420,084 Capitalized Tire Lease FY17-7 393,137 78,627 314,510 Maintenance/Support Equipment FY17-8 104,500 20,900 83,600 Facility Maintenance FY17-9 1,044,981 208,996 835,985 Information Systems FY17-10 100,000 20,000 80,000 Bus & Bus Facilities Projects' FY17-11 2,062,500 412,500 1,650,000 Ops & Facilities Security Projects FY17-12 911,498 911,498 Ops/Maint Facility FY17-13 18,977,176 18,977,176 Subtotal: FY16/17 Capital $31,872,537 $0 $2,137,849 $0 $5,314,044 $1,079,480 $1,802,490 $1,650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,888,674 Total: Operating & Capital FY16/17 $107,396,014 $42,935,026 $2,137,849 $3,633,300 $12,547,128 $5,579,480 $3,602,490 $1,650,000 $472,874 $580,000 $1,026,983 $12,100,000 $21,130,884 Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities funding is estimated FY2015 apportionment. Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-1 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contract Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (10) replacement CNG revenue vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for contract operated fixed route service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 1,685,890 STA $ 297,510 Total $ 1,983,400 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/7-2 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Demand Response PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (33) replacement unleaded revenue vehicles for use on demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for demand response service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 2,715,801 STA $ 479,259 Total $ 3,195,060 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/7-3 PROJECT NAME Replacement Support Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of replacement support vehicles PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace (11) support vehicles that have met their useful life. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 227,664 STA $ 56,916 Total $ 284,580 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-4 PROJECT NAME Fare Collection System PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase and installation of a new Fare Collection System for the fixed route fleet. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Upon completion of a system assessment, a new Fare Collection System will be purchased and installed on the fixed route fleet. This funding is required in addition to the FY15 Farebox project request in order to implement upgraded system and equipment technology and replace fireboxes that have been in service since 2002. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 1,032,480 STA $ 258,120 Total $ 1,290,600 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/7-5 PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 800,000 STA $ 200,000 Total $ 1,000,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-6 PROJECT NAME Capital Maintenance Spares PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of spare parts for rolling stock under the maintenance program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Purchase of vehicle parts based on projected needs whose individual costs meet the requirement for capital reimbursement. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 420,084 STA $ 105,021 Total $ 525,105 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY/7-7 PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires for FY2017. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected and replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 314,510 STA $ 78,627 Total $ 393437 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-8 PROJECT NAME Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of maintenance and support equipment. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 83,600 STA $ 20,900 Total $ 104,500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-9 PROJECT NAME Facility Maintenance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance of facilities in Riverside, Hemet and Corona. Project may include but is not limited to Hemet underground storage tanks, furniture, flooring, paint, plumbing, electrical, lighting, HVAC, roll up doors, roof repair/replacement, parking lot and concrete. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Facility maintenance and equipment and improvements to promote a safe and clean environment. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 835,985 STA $ 208,996 Total $ 1,044,981 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-10 PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of information systems hardware and software. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers, equipment and software needed to replace old equipment, to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20,000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-11 PROJECT NAME Bus and Bus Facilities PROJECT DESCRIPTION Projects may include purchase of buses and bus -related equipment, rehabilitation and maintenance of buses, bus stops and stations, facilities and infrastructure. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses, related equipment and bus -related facilities. Purchase and install infrastructure. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Sec 5339 $ 1,650,000 STA $ 412,500 Total $ 2,062,500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-12 PROJECT NAME Operations and Facilities Security Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Safety and security purchases for use at Agency facilities and on Agency vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Projects will improve and maintain the overall agency safety and security. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 Prop 1 B CTSGP $ 911,498 $ - Total $ 911,498 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY17-13 PROJECT NAME Operations and Maintenance Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design, land acquisition and construction of the new Operations and Maintenance Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current base in Riverside is at capacity. The agency needs to identify a new location to accommodate growth. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2017 TBD $ 18, 977,176 $ - Total $ 18,977,176 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Riverside Transit Agency FY 2017/18 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Measure A Operating Assistance Section 5307 - Riv-San Bernardino Section 5307 - Temecula/ Murrieta Section 5307 - Hemet/San Jacinto Section 5339 Bus & Bus Facilities Section 5310 Section 5311 CMAQ Farebox Other Revenue FY 2017/2018 Operating Assistance 45,713,649 40,633,649 2,700,000 1,800,000 580,000 GASB 43/45 ARC 1,500,000 1,500,000 Route 1 Ltd Operations 1,410,389 352,597 1,057,792 91 Fwy Route Operating Assistance (TIFIA) 1,500,000 1,500,000 OCTA 794 160,965 160,965 CommuterLink 212 & 217 (JARC) 1,081,553 459,660 459,660 162,233 Extended Fixed Route Service (JARC) 689,063 310,079 310,078 68,906 Travel Training 496,518 351,703 144,815 Capitalized Preventative Maintenance 6,875,000 1,375,000 4,300,000 1,200,000 Capital Cost of Contracting 7,250,000 1,450,000 2,900,000 2,900,000 DAR Plus 320,000 320,000 Farebox (Cash, Tix, Passes) 11,968,861 11,968,861 Interest Income 20,000 20,000 Advertising Revenue 15,000 15,000 CNG Sales 185,000 185,000 RINS/LCFS Credits 200,000 200,000 Medi-Cal Reimbursement 600,000 300,000 300,000 Wentworth Bldg Lease 63,654 63,654 Subtotal: FY17/18 Operating $80,049,651 $47,052,687 $0 $4,360,965 $7,969,738 $4,100,000 $1,800,000 $0 $144,815 $580,000 $1,057,792 $12,200,000 $783,654 Revenue Vehicles - DO Heavy Duty - Revenue Vehicles - (11) COFR Repl FY18-1 2,253,020 337,953 1,915,067 Revenue Vehicles - (5) DAR Repl FY18-2 500,300 75,045 425,255 Non -Revenue Vehicles - (3) Support Vehicles FY18-3 81,000 16,200 64,800 Associated Transit Improvements FY18-4 1,000,000 200,000 718,000 48,000 34,000 Capital Maintenance Spares FY18-5 750,000 150,000 600,000 Capitalized Tire Lease FY18-6 412,794 82,559 330,235 Maintenance/Support Equipment FY18-7 100,000 20,000 80,000 Facility Maintenance FY18-8 452,720 90,544 362,176 Information Systems FY18-9 100,000 20,000 80,000 Ops/Maint Facility FY18-10 18,977,175 18,977,175 Subtotal: FY17/18 Capital $24,627,009 $0 $992,301 $0 $2,298,290 $410,176 $1,949,067 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,977,175 Total: Operating & Capital FY17/18 $104,676,660 $47,052,687 $992,301 $4,360,965 $10,268,028 $4,510,176 $3,749,067 $0 $144,815 $580,000 $1,057,792 $12,200,000 $19,760,829 Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-1 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contract Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (11) replacement CNG revenue vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 1,915,067 STA $ 337,953 Total $ 2,253,020 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-2 PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Demand Response PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (5) replacement unleaded revenue vehicles for use on demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for demand response service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 425,255 STA $ 75,045 Total $ 500,300 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-3 PROJECT NAME Replacement Support Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replace (3) support vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace support vehicles that have met their useful life. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 64,800 STA $ 16,200 Total $ 81,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP /D # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-4 PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 800,000 STA $ 200,000 Total $ 1,000,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-5 PROJECT NAME Capital Maintenance Spares PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of spare parts for rolling stock under the maintenance program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Purchase of vehicle parts based on projected needs whose individual costs meet the requirement for capital reimbursement. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 600,000 STA $ 150,000 Total $ 750,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-6 PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires for FY2018. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected and replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 330,235 STA $ 82,559 Total $ 412,794 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-7 PROJECT NAME Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of maintenance and support equipment. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20,000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP /D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME FY18-8 Facility Maintenance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Miscellaneous facility maintenance. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Facility maintenance and equipment and improvements to promote a safe and clean environment. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 362,176 STA $ 90,544 Total $ 452,720 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-9 PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of information systems hardware and software. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers, equipment and software needed to replace old equipment, to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20,000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER FY18-10 PROJECT NAME Operations and Maintenance Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design, land acquisition and construction of the new Operations and Maintenance Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current base in Riverside is at capacity. The agency needs to identify a new location to accommodate growth. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2018 TBD $ 18, 977,175 $ - Total $ 18,977,175 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance TABLE 6 — PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2009/10 — FY 2011/12) Action(s) Taken And Results To Date 1. Revise calculation for full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) reported to the State Controller's Office. Calculation for full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) reported to the State Controller's Office was changed in FY13 in accordance with the recommended methodology received during the triennial audit. Future calculations will be made in conformance with this recommendation as well. Status: Completed 2. Prepare and submit separate State Controller Reports for general public transit and specialized service for elderly and disabled. Beginning in FY13, RTA submitted separate State Controller's Reports for general public transit and specialized service for the elderly and disabled. Future State Controller's Reports will be prepared in conformance with this recommendation as well. Status: Completed 3. Improve on -time performance of directly operated fixed route service. RTA monitors on -time performance (OTP) and actively pursues means of improvement via service and schedule modifications and recommendations made through planning analysis. OTP in directly operated fixed route service improved from 83 percent in FY2012 to 84 percent in FY2013 and 85 percent in FY2014. Status: On -going Table 6-Triennial Audit FY 2016-18 SRTP ��EME�� fvmqlmspzmim{ammsim Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan Review Riverside Transit Agency Data Elements FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 9,826,968 Passenger Miles 68,045,953 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 740,219.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 11,987,607.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 14,639,851.0 Total Operating Expenses $66,972,981 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $14,403,336 Net Operating Expenses $52,569,645 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 21.50% I >= 17.44% I 26.10% I Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $90.48 <_ $82.41 $82.37 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $5.35 >_ $3.60 and <_ $4.88 $4.55 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.77 >_ $0.52 and <_ $0.70 $0.48 Better Than Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $71.02 >_ $49.42 and <_ $66.86 $60.87 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.39 >_ $3.16 and <_ $4.28 $3.85 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 13.30 >= 11.65 and <= 15.76 13.40 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.82 >= 0.75 and <= 1.01 0.85 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of I ��MME�� lie s ivmIlmsprmim(artmsir FY 2015/16 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; Riverside Transit Agency All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2013/14 End of Year Actual FY 2014/15 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2015/16 Plan FY 2015/16 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 9,568,758 7,244,035 10,305,607 None Passenger Miles 66,804,624 68,140,270 73,477,011 None Revenue Hours 698,426.9 540,940.5 795,419.0 None Total Hours 797,294.9 622,817.1 894,624.0 None Revenue Miles 10,940,823.1 8,551,940.1 12,718,415.0 None Total Miles 13,493,672.5 10,579,300.8 15,481,742.0 None Operating Costs $55,837,081 $44,555,701 $69,079,587 None Passenger Revenue $14,823,809 $11,629,258 $15,063,536 None Operating Subsidy $41,013,272 $32,926,443 $54,016,051 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $79.95 $82.37 $86.85 <_ $83.16 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $5.10 $5.21 $5.43 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $5.84 $6.15 $6.70 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 26.55% 26.10% 21.80% >= 17.5% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $4.29 $4.55 $5.24 >_ $3.87 and <_ $5.23 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.61 $0.48 $0.74 >_ $0.41 and <_ $0.55 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $58.72 $60.87 $67.91 >_ $51.74 and <_ $70.00 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $3.75 $3.85 $4.25 >_ $3.27 and <_ $4.43 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 13.70 13.40 13.00 >= 11.39 and <= 15.41 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.87 0.85 0.81 >= 0.72 and <= 0.98 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2015/16 Plan to the FY 2015/16 Primary Target. TransTrack Manager'"' 5/1/2015 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 9 — HIGHLIGHTS OF SRTP Operating & Financial Data FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Estimate FY 15/16 Planned Systemwide Ridership 8,800,273 9,242,793 9,568,758 9,826,966 10,305,607 Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $78.41 $79.18 $79.90 $85.00 $86.06 Recent Trends: • RTA has seen continued record breaking ridership. • Service improvements implemented in January 2015 focused on frequency, span, and connectivity improvements, streamlining, addressing capacity constraints, and were consistent with the COA study reoorrrnendations approved in January 2015. Proposed Service Changes for FY2016: • Proposed service changes will focus on providing good connectivity to and from the Perris Valley Line rail extension between Downtown Riverside and South Perris due to commence service in Fall 2015. Further changes based on the COA 10-Year Transit Network Plan will be progressively implemented subject to funding availability and the required operational resources. For exarrple, in September 2015 it is proposed to restructure routes 7, 8, and 23 in the Lake Elsinore, Wfldomar, and Murrieta areas to improve transit service for existing and potential new customers. Operating Budget ($69,079,587): • Increase of 3.1%over FY15 budget. Variance analysis by cost element is provided below.. o Salaries — 7.0% increase due to service growth, annual ization of positions added in FY15, modest headcount growth and wage increaocs per contract. o Benefits — 3.1 % increase due to medical insurance costs. o Services —1.1 % decrease. o Materials & Supplies — 9.8% increase due to CNG fuel and parts usage costs. o Purchased Transportation —1.4% increase due to service increase, contracted rates and fuel. Capital Budget ($27,035,728): • RTAs 3-Year Capital Improvement Plan (GP) is updated to reflect the current economic outlook and service needs with a focus on items which are mandatory to support our current service profile. FY 2016 G P projects are funded with Federal Sections 5307, 5310 and 5339, State Transportation Assistance (STA), Local Transportation Fund (LTF), Prop 1 B Security and Prop 1 B PTMISEA A sur r rr nary by project element for FY 2016 is shown below: o Revenue Vehicles - $7.7 million for (25) Contracted Fixed Route and (29) DARvehides. o Non -Revenues Vehicles - $.6 million for (23) support cars and trucks. o Facility- $12.0 million for new Operations and Maintenance Facility (Prop 1B PTMISEA) o Facility Maintenance - $1.9 rrillion for operations and facilities maintenance and security projects o Maintenance - $.9 million for tire lease and equipment. o Associated Transit Improvements - $1.1 rrillion for bus stop enhancements. o Shelters & Stops - $2.8 rrillion for RapidLink infrastructure and other stop enhancements. Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2013/14 Audit FY 14/15 (Estimate) FY 15/16 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 10,872,931 11,400,000 11,800,104 2.Interest - - - 3. General Fund Supplement - - - 4. Measure A 2,741,111 2,949,287 2,833,432 5. Advertising Revenue 17,911 18,000 15,000 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets 1,058 - 7. CNG Revenue 147,073 208,000 185,000 8. Lease/ Other Revenue - - 60,000 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund 509,244 - - 10. Investment Income 40,019 50,000 20,000 11. CalPers CERBT 169,736 1,000,000 - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - - 13.Other Revenues 324,726 200,000 150,000 TOTAL REVENUE 14,823,809 15,825,287 15,063,536 for Farebox Calculation (1-13) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 55,837,080 60,972,981 69,079,587 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 26.55% 25.95% 21.81% APPENDIX A: RTA SYSTEM MAP AND FIXED -ROUTE MAPS Route 204 continues to Montclair Transit Center. ONTARIO JURUPA MARLAY z cc 14 117 14 Loma Linda University Medical Center LOMA LINDA 01111 PROSPECT z M. Loma Linda VA a BAN m Hospital 0 a BELLEGRAVE o m Swan Lake MHP LIMONITE 68TH ST 3 PHILADELPHI it w =� /oNgl`O Count V llage �tL 0 5 GRANITE HILLS 29 Un a 4 EASTVACE CITRUS x Norco City Hall 4TH Norco gr Senior Center LAMPTON Norco College 3RD METROLINK 1cc Z o z ▪ W rin m COMMERCE z ` s � x City Hall fn.nnn < Route 216 to Village atOranae — — — __216 1 91 < OCTA 794 to South 6TH ST Coast Metro CORONA GRAND» r 1 8, m :30TH _.r Corona Regional Medical Center z 0 C 6th 0 t r ea 21 )UR�PN MISSION BLVD The Pedley Metrolink M I R A L O M A Y tation o� LIMONITE ARLINGTON NORCO Z Corona Transit Center 0© 206 216 HIDDEN VALLEY • Corona Transit \ • Center. • \\ _ • \\ 216— -794 `T�/206 _•I \ r Corona Cruiser I z �G FFT�'G♦ �Pv�� �♦P 1 794, ID 17Canyon Community Church Park and Ride Vintage Terrace Senior Community \ \ • • \ • • F 9G La Sierra vQ\�Qo� University 1 29 SantaAnaRiver 15 F 91 12 AF9 _ Boa .' 1110. 7 JURUPA VALLEY METROLINK ARLINGTON GOULD» CMN 0- 13 Mental County COUNTYFARM ,y ealth FF� Galleria HOLE at Tyler Kaiser Hasp' �F9 CFO A F V 0� FGry FF CnP l�r���p\P�P9� y HOME GARDENS CAJALCO 206 TF ♦. ♦*Dos Lagos ♦use', DOS LAGOS • • • TEMESCALCANYON » ---- Tom's Farms • • • • • • • 206 • • ♦�o♦P*Q- La Sierra TROLINK Metrolink Station • 15 Fyn 9 • Riverside Transit Agency T Riverside Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®®m ® 16 El 29 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 4 x CENTRAL17 view Hospi T Galleria at Tyler ®®E m 216 Sunline 220 J} •00 • ^0 4t, 29 %bERSIry iverside mmunity Hospital o Q m 12 JURUPA 0 Q " ARLINGTON ♦�Q�P�P 10 ce49ER CENTER 14 ` e 121SSO/ Q / ISj= SPRUIE 3RDc z4 «MASS. RTA 3RD o� 11 1201 '�C CENTRAL Rroc nArcade ARLINGTON y l� 20 F « MARLBOROUGH 0 BLAINE I LINDEN `---204--1'--- UNIVERSI 14 s MLK �41T "—�-- t� ML KING 20 T Magnolia & Elizabeth 0®® 14 El RIVERSIDE 216 OCTA 794 Lake Mathews TEMESCAL CANYON ♦ • 206 • System Map (951) 565-5002 www.RiversideTransit.com Welcome aboard the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), your community transportation provider. The RTA operates 44 bus routes to provide you with safe, cost-effective and reliable service in western Riverside County. We hope that this System Map is useful to you in planning your trip. Should you need additional information, please call the Customer Information Center at (951) 565-5002. CD Route Number Route Path 33333 Commuter Routing Alternate Routing MAP NOT TO SCALE OPoint of Interest O Interstate Medical Facility 0 State Highway Transfer Point Main Road Metrolink Station Water Riverside Trolley Route ROUTE 50 Jury Trolley Legend I Map not to scale OTransfer Point and Information O Medical Facility O Trolley Stops T Market & 14th MI®® 50 TEQUESQUITE Eden Lutheran Church Parking Lot O United Methodist Church _ T 10th&Main 208 210 City Hall 10TH ST. • 11THST. r Hall of Count w l▪ usticeAdminist ative Y Center Riverside County � Court House I 14TH STREET Riverside O Community zo Hospital Calvary it ▪ Presbyterian m Church Parking Lot (nearest stop 14th & Magnolia) z 0 O rr RICE • TERRACINA • • 50 Q 0 Z 12TH ST. T 14th & Magnolia 0®® 50 Physical Therapy & Sports Clinic RIVERSIDE RCC • • Magnolia&Terracina 0®® 50 © 2014 Riverside Transit Agency. Effective Date: May 10, 2015 cik 20 LL VAN BUREN s • GRAND TERRACE HIGHGROVE <a UCR =.- FBIG SPRINGS `♦ ® 60 �`♦` `♦'208- CENTRAL j*,,+ o�F CANYON' LOCHmoot? I 208 ` I \ 1 1_ 1 208 I 1 1 21) CREST 9lFf4164'o WOODCREST 206 8 CAJALCO 27 «MISSION GROVE z y Security Social Y Office 22 J .210 ``♦ ALESSANDRO MARCH JPA ORANGETERRACE MARIPOSA 21 o OLEANDER z 441, 3 0 C OLD LAKE RD 18 • •. a w Moreno..: Valley • ll Mall : j 1210 I_ EUCALYPTUS 11 ��vM�o‘PHAH MANZANITA Fo N SF 18 s IRONWOOD HEMLOCK c 3 CC ♦ 41 AKLAND RIDER 212 22 m Mead Valley Community MEAD Center VALLEY MEADOWBROOK T Lake Elsinore Outlet Center El 8 El Out Center% �f ROUTE 51 Crest Cruiser T University Village& Village Towers Apts 0 14 16 El 0 V R • Post Office Vassar Hi hlander Shuttle Univer 3 T Village Towers Apartments University • Village YAv T Chicago & University 0® ®® 16 14 MLKRiva, UaiversityAv. Spruce • �s0 T Iowa & Blaine • 131 10 14 Blaine UCR • 1 16 51 204 210 SunLine 220 Highlander Shuttle T Canyon Crest & MLK (Lot 30) ® 208 210 16 RIVERSIDE • Chicago & Central ®® Ceatra, Legend I Map not to scale 0 Transfer Point and Information 0 Trolley Stops O �o T Crest Dr. MGtg/vd 51 a Moat, vista • • T • 0 v UCR T Canyon Crest & Central Eil 16 206 let �`• • r♦ oil/1;.8♦♦; P\•1,0\ LEUSD `011j�9 POTTERY 8 Lake Elsinore 206 • P`' • • 22 • • • 74 Sunline 220 T Moreno Valley Mall 16 18 19 208 210 Sunline 220 EPSR \ ♦ BOXSPRINGS ♦_ • CENTERPOINT SUNNYMEAD c FIR ;= a O COTTONWOOD ACTUS o MEYE w March ARR 22 LAKE ELSINORE 62,>14 sib • • • • 206 • • • • 41 tvWESTON 22 ALESSANDRO JFK Canyon Lake RAILROAD • 40 • 206 • JFK 20 o Medical Center 41 41 20 PERRIS FAIRGROUND • • `1, Walmart 208 27 no 212 ca • 19 • Cherry Hills &Bradley El 40 61 74 74 208 QUAIL VALLEY Fire Station ANYOL LAKE • 40 40 Canyon Lake City Hall Wildomar v41770 City Hall 40 20 41 MORENO VALLEY T Moreno Valley College 18 19 20 41 • Perris Station Transit Center Effl 19 208 cfsER 74 CHAMBERS AVE 30 74 74 27 35 212 60 210 35 City Hall T Hemet Valley Mall EEE WINCHESTER 40 Menifee City Hall ROHRABACHER MURRIETA Inland Valley CLINTON KEITH Medical Center PRIELIPP • 206 • WILDOMAR 116 23 Murrieta City Hall & Senior Center Vist 41 Rancho Springs edical Center LA PIEDRA • 74 Mt San Jacinto et Loma Linda University ‘w Medical Center Murrieta HS 61 208 206 T County Center Drive 61 79 IOUrryoR Es Temecula City Hall 74 217 79 217 79 79 MAGDAS COLORADOS ▪ AULD 79 TECHNOLOGY 74 79 74 42 212 1111 THORNTO MUSTANG 79 217 31 31 BANNING 210 SAN JACINTO HIGHLAND SPRINGS» STAGECOACH PLAZA 212 COTTONWOOD ENTERPR FRUITVALE 33 42 1.0 CC Hemet g Valle Ma I 217 8 FRENCH VALLEY Southwest Justice Center TEMECULA T Promenade Mall co P.F. Chang's 24 24 • Community \ Center • • • 24 32 MENLO 74 33 OAKLAND 217 LA DEVONSHIR' 31 ACACIA 74 SZEIMEECEEI T Mt. San Jacinto College Mt. San Jacinto College ESP CMM 32 City Hall MAIN ANADE WEALT 31 32 74 32 32 MAYBER 42 EVANS 33 33 27 Soboba Casino VALLE VISTA THORNTON EAST HEMET Temecula Trolley ROUTE 55 Temecula Trolley • 61 79 • County Center CC 61 79 • • Palm Plaza Shopping Center Extended Stay Best Abbott Western Legend I Map not to scale 0 Transfer Point and Information 0 Trolley Stops The Promenade at Temecula 74 TEMECULA Sunline 220 continues to Palm Desert Temecula Hospital Temecula Walmart • 24 24 PEPPERCORN /Great Oak HS Canyon Crest Towne Centre to Oceanside 202 76 217 to Escondido Transit Center i UCR / Riverside Downtown Terminal to W. Corona Metrolink Station Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: RCC, California Baptist University, Parkview Community Hospital, Galleria at Tyler, Kaiser Hospital, Corona. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. iverside Downtown Terminal 1 10 12 13 14 15 16 22 29 49 204 208 210 212 216 Omnitrans215 1 SunLine220 T Riverside - DowntownMetrolinkStation 0 16 208 210 SunLine 220 Amtrak T Brockton Arcade 0 10 m® RIVERSIDE T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 T Corona Transit (enter o© 206 216 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red METROLIN West Corona Metrolink Station �r Smith Ave Q METROLINK V „ orona Park And -Ride Coron City Hall 14 44insst K-Mart Riverside 3rdst Blaine nest Terminal Q Missio n Inn t° Ave a Universi `e' tyAve 6-4 _ T 9 Riverside City College 14th St Riverside Community Hospital Central M.S. T Central Ave arcy Library an Buren 8/vd Hosprr i Q NoSePve c g T Galleria at Tyler BuchananLincol Ave» n St» T 3 r4n48/vd 4 T T a r54a0.s t y T 5 8 7 R Ramona H.S. c• v T y 10 II II METROLINK Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station • Riverside Plaza Q 3' Cesar Chavez Community Center University Village o` 0 UCR T UCR at Bannockburn 0® 204 T Magnolia & 14th 0®® Arlington Ave Ala —son st California Baptist University Chemawa M.S. Sherman Indian H.S. Arlington Library 0 TYlerst 6 Kaiser Hospit a Sierra Ave Indiana Ave • • VillegasM.S. 50 RTA and Corona Cruiser honor each other's Day and 30-Day passes at shared stops. Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information CB= Alternate Routing a Long-term Detour Routing T La Sierra & Magnolia 0®® T Magnolia & McKinley 0 Corona Cruiser Blue McKinley St, • 'CORONA T 6th & Smith 0 T 6th & Main 1 3 Home Gardens Library 1 _> T Auto Center 2 Corona Cruiser Red Corona Cruiser Blue, Red 3 Swan Lake MHP, Eastvale, Norco, Corona Transit Center to Belle & 10th Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web she www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Also serving: Norco, Norco Senior Center, Norco City Hall, RCC, North Main Plaza, Corona. No service on Sundays or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Bellegrave Ave - 8 58th St T T Limonite & Hamner 29 Harada Heritage Park E River Heights LS. x Eleanor Roosevelt N.S. v Citrus St �DMV Post 0Lha `oJ0' DPSS 4 City Hall Norco Senior Center Norco College 4 T North Main Plaza 5 3rd St Target Corona Cruiser Blue T Belle & 10th T Corona Cruiser Blue, Red a 8th St O Corona O Senior ✓ Center T 1 Library Stan Reynold Pkwy 10th St Ontario Ave T EASTVALE Eastvale Gateway Uernola Marketplace 65th St 68th St Norco I ibrary 3 6th St 5th St 4th St Lampton Ln Limonite Ave L LC 3rd St 2nd St North Main Plaza Corona Transit Center METROLINK 2 W. Gran Corona Park - And -Ride Corona Mall uy«n T T Main & 6th o© Corona Regional 2 Medial P, Center �`a„0: - NORCO O Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Weekdays Only T Corona Transit Center 0© 206 216 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red RTA and Corona Cruiser honor each other's Day and 30-Day passes at shared stops. 7 Lake Elsinore Outlet Center to Inland Valley Medical Center Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rotas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O, N Also serving: DPSS, Downtown Lake Elsinore, Senior Center. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Outlet Center El Lake Elsinore Outlet Center 6 Riverside Dr 15 (.e°tta\Pde LAKE ELSINORE Target DPSS chap St Ortega H.S. s� Lake Elsinore ahCity Hall a�A`P c Senior Center lake Dt a • Lai` T Malaga & Mission Trail 0 8 �Q Post Office A do 3d e" S WILDOMAR Q,s,e 2 T 4 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information LAKE ELSINORE T Walmart 0 8 40 Walmart T Prielipp Rd at Inland Valley Dr 0® T Palomar & Central 0 T 8 Wildomar Assisted a Living QGotp% a KetthRd o- ?fl • Inland Valley y Medical Center a T 1 Prielipp Rd Kevin Rd 8 Lake Elsinore Walmart to Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to drange. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O, N akeside H.S Ortega Hwy Also serving: Stater Bros, Albertsons, Lake Elsinore Recreation Center. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Lake Elsinore Outlet Center c Albertson Baldwin Blvd LAKE ELSINORE Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing T Outlet Center E $El Lakeland Village M.S. d Chase F r Bank for yo ,roo Albertson Railroad Canyon Rd • Walmart s PostOffice David A Brown M.S. WILDOMAR T Walmart T Malaga & Mission Trail 1 Palomar & Central 0 10 Big Springs & Watkins to Galleria at Tyler Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to Mange. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Downtown Riverside, Poly High, Gage Middle School, Notre Dame High, Calif. School for Deaf, Arlington High. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Riverside DowntownTe mina! 0 10 ®®m ® 16 El 29 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 216 SunLine 220 T Brockton Arcade 010 m T Iowa &Blaine El 10 RTA 8 Riverside Downtown Few lq Pox Theater • n soopVe fss «Urnversity Ave , g 14th St 4 Legend I Map not to scale 4 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information CM:Mo Alternate Routing T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 14 T 7 �T Riverside County Administrative Center Riverside City College 0 d P� ® Riverside C.3, Plaza Q v T 5 Brockton Arcade Man Li. rk 6 Ma. on St 91 Arlington N.S. St Van Buren Drive -In But Byrd Arlington library 1 T Galleria at Tyler 2 �G P� o� d /� odd ��a `eS 9y KSMart T a 10 Riverside �a Sports UR di,�i Complex OsOr John North h� H.s. 15 'Pa to T County Administration Bldg ®® 06 eSt m rge 10 208 210 SQa Riverside STEM Academy SunLine 220 Poly H.S. ?, . d9 �P m a WB Only Gage M.S. RIVERSIDE it Moreno Valley Mall/March ARB Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Also serving: Sunnymead Middle School, Moreno Valley High School. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Moreno Valley Mall m SunLine 220 -04 Moreno Valley Mall Towngate Blvd MORENO VALLEY T Alessandro & Frederick m March ARB City Hall O Delays may occur due to construction on Ironwood Ave. Ironwood Ave «Counter -clockwise I Clockwise» Kaiser Medical Offices Sunnymead M.S. Eucalyptus Ave Moreno Valley H.S. Cottonwood Ave k Alessandro Blvd Cactus Ave A 0 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information Riverside County Superior Court Ei c Badger Springs M.S. Hemlock Ave Post Office Sunnymead Blvd T Heacock & Sunnymead m T Cottonwood & Heacock m T Alessandro & Heacock m 20 Meyer Dry 1FK Dr 02 12 La Cadena & Stephens to Merced & Magnolia Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to drange. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Galleria at Tyler, DMV, Downtown Terminal, Salvation Army. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. RIVERSIDE T Riverside Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®® ® 16 29 14 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 `Arlington & Streeter 12 T Van Buren & California ®®® County Mental Health e La Sierra P° Univers,,A�S .S 2W Q\e' 2E 4 CASA Riverside County e Farm Rd Hole Ave Ty ld P �L d'90 P -.•°f% Kaiser Hospital s 1 T Vie"$' (,,q. if • 3 T T Juvenile Hall 216 SunLine 220 Ruth Lewis Community Center/Reid Park Garner Rd Columbia Ave. •' a. Riverside Downtown 2 Terminal Fox Theater T County Administration ®® Eill 10 208 SunLine 220 T 8 A s N a Center St 1st sell St o` Salvation Army «Mission Inn Ave Univ. Ave Riverside County Administrative c Center Bldg Riverside a'Hall lutice 14th St Riversideofs City College» 7 3 Jurupa Ave o 6 • Arlington Ave T 5 !oe\\aP� T Galleria at Tyler lo EMI ®®m Galleria at Tyler T Merced & Magnolia 0®® Janet Goeske (tr. Sears T 210 DMV Hardman Center Riverside Plaza 91 216 14 T Fjr d6P 44 T Magnolia & Elizabeth NM= 14 El a 20 Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information m Alternate Routing 13 Spruce & Atlanta to Galleria at Tyler - Riverside Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Galleria at Tyler, DPSS (Tyler office), Riverside Airport, RCC, RTA Headquarters. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. L°&1111R!'w11w • T Chicago & University MEI 14 16 13 51 westbound-- El T County Administration 6 10 208 SunLine 220 Riverside Downtown Terminal T Riverside Downtown Terminal 15 204 16 22 208 210 29 49 212 216 Omnitrans215 SunLine220 T 14th & Magnolia =Ella RIVERSIDE IT Arlington&Monroe ®® T Colorado & Van Buren ®® Norte Vista • H.S. t\Sr°‘P�Q walmari `s e a S\�SP �9 T Arlington&Tyler Ella T 2 WelisM.S. �f aao DPSS toe' Bldg '54 �e • •o \4esS\tVp, l\�ptR 9P� • e T‘4,0 �h�r 210 T 5 4 Riverside Community Hospital Central M.S.,• • 50 Riverside Pt�\nA` Airport • 0 �aaS���.aQt Gallen• a 4<t at Tyler v �*;9 Sierra M.S. e. P� 3 Riversid City Hall T4 Riverside County Administrative Center Riverside City College Riverside Plaza 9 ‘1, a0 -Pie b ¢S `pS SSa Eastbound $� �eSt T 6 Libra 0st John North H.S. Post �. ochre d 90 9 A Stratton Community Center Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing T Galleria at Tyler ®10 ®® m T 216 14 Galleria at Tyler to Riverside Downtown Terminal to Loma Linda VA Hospital Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Galleria at Tyler, Riverside Auto Center, Calif. School for the Deaf, Riverside Medical Clinic, RCC. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. RTA does not serve Michigan Ave., Omnitrans Route 325 does. SPA 0. (.• • T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®® ® 16 En 29 14 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 T Brockton Arcade 0 10 m® 216 SunLine 220 T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 Galleria : at Tyler T 1 Tie 14 o� a� �c COLTON Riverside Downtown Terminal T 4 c m T 3 Riverside Medical Center Riverside Community Hospital Riverside Plaza 2 T K-Mart St T Loma Linda VA Hospital 14 Omnitrans 2,19, 325, SBX 117 veaS9ei pve T v Loma Linda 7 University %6 VA Vtp° Hospital LOMA LINDA Loma Linda • • `0�*��UniversityHospital • •• PS��E L F 6T GRAND TERRACE HIGHGROVE T Michigan & Center .7 ve,k0• asoeS� 5 T University voe Village \V NietSCesar Chavez Community Center California School for the Deaf Madison St 14 Omnitrans 325 T Iowa&Blaine El 10 14 T University & Lemon 1211 SunLine 220 RIVERSIDE Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information 15 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Merced : Magnolia Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Hardman Center, Riverside Airport, Metrolink, La Sierra, Cal. Paramedical College. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Fox>heater MtsstOn\ "AVe T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®® ® 16 ®® 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information cm Alternate Routing 6 La Sierra University T Arlington & Van Buren 29 14 49 216 SunLine 220 T 14th & Magnolia 0®® 50 PtS0„0�PVe Loma Vista M.S. La Siena • Senior Center. 5 LA SIERRA T Norte Vista H.S. Ty� s T La Sierra & Hole �d La Siena ;9 H.S. `N 411 La Sierra & Magnolia 0®® 0 pyP�`Psr» T „ T 11 1 ci Riverside Downtown Terminal kk\ R'vern'deV e .5, City Hall s \AN- T • Riverside • munity �ital T Brockton Arcade 0 10 m® RIVERSIDE d O0, Riverside a Airport T 7 K-Mart • • T Arlington & Monroe ®® Pam¢ oa tea°° Kaiser Hospital a Sierra Metrolink 41,te,„, ,_ Statio �c rr y,�2 4 T r 3 T �s • 2 MEIROLINK �' P Hilkrest H.S. ,DP ac \tea Arizona M.S. Ids. `^ SV��4sae° 1, Sears 1 Central M.S. Riverside City College s 9 Marcy Library T Pie r\�oA�p° Galleria at Tyler 8 T Riverside Plaza 9 Arlington oo Square ?j, d� s s o42 r �o je r T Arlington & Streeter ®® a T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 La Sierra Metrolink Station El OCTA 794 14 o� 16 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Moreno Valley Mall Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O T University & Lemon 10 14 Also serving: Downtown, UCR, Canyon Crest Towne Center, Canyon Springs Plaza. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 16 MORENO VALLEY Canyon Springs Plaza 204 208 210 101 SunLine 220 UCR Canyon Crest Dr .O v�Q• Canyon Crest Towne Center University Village i a • Lemon' Fox Theater Market Stw Mission Inn Ave u 3 T T Cesar Chavez Community Center 2 e St Moreno . Valley Mall 4 T Heritage Way 0 • Day St Target T Moreno Valley Mall lia 16 18 19 208 210 SunLine 220 >3m RIVERSIDE a KR at Campus Dr Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station T METROLINK -1 1• Riverside Downtown Terminal • Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing 16 51 T Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station 0 16 208 210 SunLine 220 Amtrak T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal p1o®® El 16 IID Eill 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 29 14 49 216 SunLine 220 18 Sunnymead Ranch to Moreno Valley College Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. T Moreno Valley Mall m 16 18 Also serving: Moreno Valley Mall/Hometown Buffet, Canyon Springs High School, Sunnymead Ranch, Moreno Valley High School, Vista Del Lago High School, Moreno Valley College. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 19 208 210 SunLine 220 Moreno Valley Mall kE- B Old Lake D Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy Vista Heights M.S. Canyon Springs H.S. «CenterpointDr Moreno Valley ate Ave H.S. Cottonwood Ave T Cottonwood & Frederick m s T Cottonwood & Heacock m NB ONLY » CO 6 MORENO VALLEY Legend I Map not to scale QTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information o® Northbound Only Manzanita Ave O T Perris & Alessandro Cottonwood Ave Badger Springs M.S. Vista w �DelLago Zgi H.S. a JRDr = S Gentian Ave Iris Ave » K'^ Moreno • Valley • College Cahuilla» Vista Verde M.S. 79 Moreno Valley Mall to Perris Station Transit Center - Trumble Rd Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. Moreno Valley Mall 8 T Also serving: March Mountain High School, Moreno Valley College, Perris, Perris High School. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T wn or - 112 Centerpoint Dr T Moreno Valley Mall m SunLine 220 7 Sunnymead Blvd • T • Sunnymead & Heacock 11 19 March ;Mountain H.S. MORENO Alessandro Blvd VALLEY T Perris & Ramona Expwy m 19 T Ross/Lowe's/Starcrest 19 41 Legend I Map not to scale iO Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information a Alternate Routing CC Val Verde H.S. 3 T 6 O T Perris & Alessandro 18 19 20 T Moreno Valley College 18 19 20 41 Badger _as Springs ao M.S. • Iris Ave ., T organ St< Ross/Lowe's/ Starcrest Perris Valley Spectrum Weimar Orange Ave Perris 10 Theater ■ Krameria Ave 4 SS m PERRIS Perris City Hall E San Jacinto Ave T Perris Station Transit Center 19 30 74 208 5 T Moreno Valley College Perris Fairgrounds Ramona Expy IT Valley Plaza Hospital r 19 30 Kindred Hospital Riverside Nuevo Rd Perris H.S. Jarvis 5t Perris Station W 4th St Transit Center Trumble Rd at 1 74 '- 20 Magnolia Center, RCRMC, Kaiser Permanente, Moreno Valley College Information Center (951)565.5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. �O! �NV' No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Perris & Alessandro T Central & Victoria Poly H.S. Victoria Ave • iverside 2 Plaza .119 Magnolia Ave» Nason St» Moreno Valley School District Moreno • . , Valley Library T Post Office Day St P�essa�a`o�\,a 4 Moreno Beach Dr RCRMC — Lasselle St Peninsula Ct» Perris Blvd Indian St m -o i Frederick St Moreno Valley City Hall Mission Grove Pkwy Trautwein Rd RIVERSIDE Kaiser Permanente Hospit-1 T Moreno Valley College I0 18 19 20 Moreno Valley College Kitching St A v Y MORENO VALLEY Mission Grove at Social Security T Mission Grove at Social Security 20 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information om Alternate routing when school is in session Brockton Ave 21 Galleria at Tyler to Country Village Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 0 a Also serving: Glen Avon Library and Van Buren. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Marlay Av T Philadelphia Ave Country Village 5 T J U R U PA San SevaineWy VALLEY T Mulberry & Marlay Omnitrans 82 \0A FONTANA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1' Country Village Ben Nevis Blvd 49 204 Mission Blvd RIVERSIDE COUNTY 0 GLEN AVON Glen Avon Library lurupa Valley H.S. Mira Loma Jurupa Rd M.s. T 4 Limonite Ave T Etiwanda & Limonite Ell Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information 29 a v+ Pedley Metrolink METROLINK Station PEDLEY it is 3s 3N • Riverside County Animal Control Arlington Ave T Arlington & Van Buren ®® RIVERSIDE ♦ Galleria at Tyler io ®®® m 216 T Walmart nLONG-TERM DETOUR Clay St lurupa 14 Cinemas T California &Van Buren ®® Gam. N7 a: t T Arlington Library Galleria at Tyler T 1 22 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Riverside Downtown Terminal Mission Inn a 111V 100 9 Also serving: Lake Elsinore, Mead Valley, Woodcrest, & Kmart. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Ave r, d Riverside iv City Hall c O T Riveri de Downtown Terminal Post Office l0 10 MIEN EN 16 MI 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 Alessand Mission 29 El 14 49 216 SunLine 220 oBlvd cs� A'6•k% • r dG %. Social Security C/A, Office a Van Buren » Martin o Luther c King c H.S. Markham St Citrus Hill H.S. WOODCREST T Outlet Center 0 8 El Lake Elsinore Outlet Center 206 large Nichols Rd 1 Grove Plaza 7 T 8 T Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information RIVERSIDE T Mission Grove at Social Security 20 T Van Buren & Trautwein MIEN Oleander Ave Mariposa Ave 6 T 5 p T Clark & Cajalco I®I0 MEAD VALLEY LAKE ELSINORE Central Ave 74 Meadowbrook Ave 2 c, Cajalco Rd ri Mead valley Library Rider St eo- r 74 PERRIS San Jacinto Ave 4 Ellis Ave NdOa, Perris Station rri5 Hall Transit CJeo'or enter Center 9d �T 4th St . T Perris Station Transit Center 3 19 208 MII® I® 30 74 n f c m zs Temecula - Murrieta - Wildomar Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Also serving: Inland Valley Medical Center, Rancho Springs Medical Center, Chaparral High School, County Center Drive. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 11.1\Wildamar e City Hall J� a Inland Valley \,t, • Medical Center's P T 9 WILDOMAR 15 Murrieta Valley t\XL0 HS d ! Ka6a v « r . eyatd .• _ �t v`Qk\N I ' urdeta )� dLibrar 'f. Murrieta 9� City Hall °J &Senior iCenter T Walmart 202 206 etSt T Prielipp Rd at Inland Valley Dr M® MURRIETA gdvotme95t Clinton Keith Rd a 9 O, N di Hancock & Los Alamos Iv ea '® o° y Skyview `is Ridge Amanda ,, Apts a Vista Q * • Murrieta Calif.0aksRd H.`S..�\�QA . e 9 �e. J¢, Murrieta ,,0- Post Office Hot Springs Rd .T� 5 Equity&Ynez ®m® 79 T 4 Rancho Springs Medical Center 61 T County Center ® 24 IZEI 61 79 Los Alamos Rd Murriem TownCenie• • T Los Alamos & Whitewood Legend l Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing 208 �c 61 3 o, Grave Mailman ommunityLibrar Promenade { Mall • to 'y45 9y a0 CS - via ho •9sya Nico/as Rd Chaparral H.S. Ntechestet Rd ` 3 ■� Q TEMECULA 79 2 Rancho Temecula Town Center 24 County Center Drive to Pechanga Resort/Temecula Valley Hospital Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O, N Also serving: County Center Drive, Temecula Schools, Temecula Stage Stop & Old Town. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Grace Mellman Community Library . \Nochestet Rd... T County Center Drive ® 24 El 61 Palm Plaza 15 79 T Temecula Stage Stop 24 79 Temecula Stage Stop 3 4 Old Town 6t Main St c 0 1st 0 n T Riverside County Assessor 9p�y4 `oJ ■ Promenade -4 Mall 6 Solana Wy Tower Plaza Post Office h5t c ti F Temecula T, City Hall 79 T Equity Dr &Ynez Rd El 24 61 79 Chaparral HS Temecula E.S. Town Ctr. Target Rancho California Rd Rancho Vista r9a Temecula Library Temecula Valley Hospital 12) TEMECULA a d 1003 90 9dA„ y 2 Legend Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information m Alternate Routing Margarita M.S. Palomar Village 6 Temecula VralleyH.S. Pauband DePortola Temecula Pkwy O�et\ao\i� walmart Vail Ranch Pkwy Birdsall Sorts Park RedHawkPkwy «Peppercorn Dr Pechanga Resort OQ o\\oyt�1Y Great Oak H.S. 26 Moreno Valley Metrolink Station to Orange Terrace and Moreno Valley Mall Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com MORENO VALLEY Walmart Supercenter 2 Ca`Q�'e \ Pk y S Eucalyptus Ave METROLINK Moreno Valley Metrolink Station Moreno Town Cir Valley Mall P°Q Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Mission Grove Plaza. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. m S 0 e RIVERSIDE Alessandro Blvd Benjamin Franklin Flementary School ORANGECREST Galleria at Tyler to Hemet Valley Mall and Florida & Lincoln Information (enter (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTramit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O ' Also serving: Riverside National Cemetery, Perris High, &Valle Vista. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Cherry Hills & Bradley m 40 61 m SUN Sun City ' CITY Library SuMity Blvd E V rT w 4 ^v u Bradley Rd Sherman Rdn T Galleria at Tyler ®®® m RIVERSIDE Galleria at Tyler 91 California Citrus Van Buren Blvd State Historic Park Van Bare WOODCREST ¢ 8 Drive -In Theater Washington St Wood Rd Trautwein Rd 6 Tyler St T Perris Station Transit Center 7,r Heritage H.S. Target Hemet Valley Mall a -o LL Hemet City Hall' 19 208 ®® 30 EEiEl l Perris Station Transit Center cst, • 5 Riverside National Cemetery m CC Perris Blvd Perris HS ROMOLAND Leon Rd rb St 2s Ai' T hi" Gilmore St y A Lyon Ave I O�aFyp`1 Q,ah` 03« Lincoln Ave «Grant Ave Valle Vista Library E i¢' • Hemet Valley Mall 27 74 � ig o4d Orange Terrace • Community (enter T Van Buren & Trautwein March Field Air Museum 31 32 33 42 79 212 217 HEMET VALLE VISTA PERRIS T 9 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ICED Alternate Routing when school is in session ® Long-term Detour Routing Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O' Riverside Downtown Terminal to Hamner & Limonite Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Also serving: Belltown, Downtown Rubidoux, Rubidoux Academy, De Anza Plaza. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Hamner Ave *Limonite & Hamner Eastvale Gateway . Yernola Pats nch Rd Marketplace 11 65th & Pats Ranch T Limonite & Archer I® JURUPA VALLEY Amapa 14 v Cinemas ¢' a= DeAnzaPlaza J Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information o>m Alternate Routing RIVERSIDE Riverside Downtown Terminal Fairmount Fox Park ▪ T Theater Market St T Etiwanda & Limonite Collins St METROLINK Pedley Rd Pedley Metrolink Station Camino Real 9, ro pd, EASTVALE MIRA LOMA PEDLEY ke Rubidoux H.S. Post Office T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal l0 10 I®I®Im I® 16 El 29 49 Omnitrans 215 SunLine 220 RUBIDOUX T Mission & Rubidoux 30 Perris - Weston & Strohm to Walmart Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. I Also serving: Perris High School, Civic Center, Post Office, Library. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 0 3 c Weston Rd Ramona Expy T Perris Station Transit Center ®® EiEl San Jacinto Ave 19 208 2 30 74 a Perris Station a Transit Center 4th St = Placentia Ave OW a I Walmart Nuevo Rd Perris Senior Center Perris City Hall EB 4 >WB EB/lWB Library ' v EB/WB WB 7th St 11th St T Valley Plaza Hospital 19 30 Orange Ave Kindred Hospital Perris H.S. 0 rZ WB< San Jacinto Ave P�JD �9 bP EB/wB 5T EB PERRIS Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information 3 w Ellis Ave tip • Post z Office r � dfP �a - T Wilkerson & 4th Im 30 31 Beaumont/Banning to San Jacinto & Hemet Valley Mall Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O, N Also serving: Walmart, Kmart, Riverside County Administration Complex, Mt. San Jacinto Community College. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Walmart BEAUMONT/ BANNING Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information T Hemet Valley Mall m®®®m m 79 ®® Hemet WOIk(oF""not qv reen Valle P P '` Mall' MeatoAve e� Hemet Unified School Districtg Q c v T 1 DeyanshfrP tdthft4,,, e P crdA� Q y e lfdyhet AvP c°m `bJ 2 79 Beaumont Ave PassTranut 210 SunLme 220 Super C Walmart a zna . 'e • T m .*Ls' Istst FV ▪ s4?ldkPsB�t' Lo SunC Lakes Village T Sun Lakes Blvd. ®® PassTransd T Mt. San Jacinto College ®®m®® T 4 Ramona ,^ San Jacinto spy H.S. 1 d 3' SAN JACINTO o od a esptdnddeAve Riverside County Courthouse o c h Hemet OtyHall T 3 0 A Mt. San Jacinto College T Buena Vista & Devonshire ®® HEMET T5 32 Hemet Valley Mall to Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Hemet Hospital. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Esplanade & San Jacinto 42 74 Sa ecrest Dr San Jacinto H.S. Monte DP,4nlista M.S "San Jacinto Senior Center T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® 74 79 ®® v E Devonshire Ave • Hemet Valley Mall/Sears Regal Cinemas H HEMET ¢' T Hemet Unified School District Stetson Menlo Ave Hemet DPSS Valley Medical Center Hemet City Hall Acacia Acacia Ave M.s. Mayberry Ave Thornton Ave T Mt. San Jacinto College ®®m®® Mt. San Jacinto College Ramona Expy San Jacinto City Hall Main St EsrlanadeAve 3 Commonwealth Ave Regal San Jacinto Metro 12 Super Walmart Main St North Mountain M.S. 7th St S A N JACINTO T San Jacinto & Latham Latham Ave Florida Ave Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing 33 Hemet - Sanderson to East Hemet Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Hemet Valley Mall, Hemet mobile home parks. No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. • Florida & Stanford 27 33 T Florida & San Jacinto ®®® T San Jacinto & Oakland ®® San Jacinto St ■ Buena Vista St» DPSS ¢ ' State St Hemet Valley Medical Center Stanford St alDartmouth M.S. Dartmouth St Columbia St a 0 d San Jacinto St Gilbert St HEMET = Lyon Ave S Lyon Ave a Kirby St Hemet Valley Mall Sanderson Ave Target T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® 74 79 ®® Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information Johnston Ave 3 ' Sanderson Ave Hemet) 42 H.S. � rc EAST HEMET State St Lyon Ave T Sanderson & Thornton O o Cawston Ave 35 Beaumont/Banning to Moreno Valley Mall Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Walmart, Kmart, City Hall, Riverside County Regional Medical Center. No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Morenoiv" Valley Mall 1 BEAUMONT/ BANNING 4- d�a Beaumont Walmart�O� 9,r T Sun Lakes at Village ®® PassTransit T ®® PassTransit 210 SunLine 220 Super rarget' Stoneridge Towne Centre pP~�. 09 f• , J��Qc� d�biY.J ii;� Valley16, d HS Senior Cent - 60 r o� T Moreno Valley Mall m SunLine 220 s 2 T • Senior Center 19 35 4 60 Auto Mall Super Walmart RCRMC caper Walmart6 %ya'. P S< <0 .T T RCRMC ®0 MORENO VALLEY 20 5 SJJ Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information T 90. QS 40 Lake Elsinore to Sun City Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. i O Also serving: Lake Elsinore, Quail Valley, Canyon Lake, Sun City. No service on Weekends or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Cherry Hills & Bradley Sun City • Library 0000111 Menifee MENIFEE City Hall N 4 Bradley Rd SUN — Evans Rd CITY L 5[ (ente�� V Kay Cenireros c Senior Center 3 z «Murrieta Rd CC Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information Railroad Canyon Rd CANYON Quail Valley Main LAKE Fire Station Goetz Rd Gate 8 Canyon Lake Z City Hall a QUAIL o \50 VALLEY a raO��� LAKE ELSINORE �d �•S •Ploa CY csts'" (s(Css Walmart 41 Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley College and RCRMC Information Center (951) 565-soot Web site www.RiversideTransit.com 3 Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rotas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Rancho Verde High School, RE MoVal, Val Verde H.S. No service on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. MEAD VALLEY Oakwood St a Rider St 1 T Mead Valley Community Center T Cajalco & Clark ®m Cajalco Rd. T RCRMC ®0 20 MORENO VALLEY Oh Moreno Valley College m 18 19 20 T Perris & Ramona Expy 19 41 Ross/Lowe's/ Starcrest RExPya Verde d H.S. dy. Starcrest¢ i 2 T Morgan St • Ross • T Ross/Lowe's/5tarcrest 19 41 RCRMC 1FK Dr Gentian Ave T • 7 6 Cactus Ave Vista Del Logo H.S. Iris Ave T 3 H Krameria Ave 5��,° Via De Anza Rider St 4 5 T Moreno Valley College Rancho Verde H.S. PERRIS Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point 0 Transfer Point and Information 42 San Jacinto - Hemet Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 'O Also serving: San Jacinto, Soboba Springs MHE, Caravana ML, San Jacinto TP, Tradewinds ML, Grandview MHP, Las Casitas MHP, El Rancho MHE, Valley Hi MHP. No service on Sundays or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information S A N JACIN JQ Ramona Expy cc; San Jacinto City Hall 4 • • °r San Jacinto T Community c� Center ���r StdtP� 1rc�� Riverside County P o iild Support Services 5� d/ &s. 09`P ( 2E 2W t sa,4 5� c ti T Soboba Rd Soboba Casino 6 ©Soboba Springs Mobile Home Estates T San Jacinto & Esplanade 42 74 st Stater Bros 3 f Super 114d0,� Walmart d�/'to 21 \ac'oa EXCEED P4¢ 1/47* HEMET Hemet Valley Mall 41,1 D T 74 T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® 74 79 42 49 Riverside Downtown Terminal to Country Village Information (enter (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N z 0 0 ac CC Also serving: Riverside, Rubidoux. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Rivers'deDowntown Term inal 0 10 ®®m ® 16 El 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 29 El 49 216 Sunline 220 4 d / ge' RUBI DOUX Smith 9`P SS`oo Eddie •• DPSS Louis Senior Robidoux (enter galley wy Library T Mulberry & Marlay 49 Omnitrans T 3 RIVERSIDE Riverside Downtown Terminal Fox Entertainrne Plaz v, 5 „e .A Mission & Rubidoux 29 49 The rove `�Qp JURUPA VALLEY Waterpark d9G. Camino Real Glen Avon Patriot Heritage Park H.S. cei o PNitest 2 Country Villa T �v 1 e Rd T r` m Pedlej'Rd FeisParsr GLEN AVON h COUNTRY VILLAGE Country Cabernet Drt Village T Country village • Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information 49 204 50 Jury Trolley Information Center (951) 565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IO N Also serving: Jury Remote Parking to 12th & Main, Riverside County Courthouse. Runs Monday —Thursday Only. No service on the following holidays and court closure days: New Year's Day, MLK Day, Lincoln's Birthday, President's Day, Washington's Birthdays, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day. RIVERSIDE T Market & 14th MIMEO 50 Eden Lutheran Church First United Methodist Church of Riverside Riverside City Hall 10th St. 11 th St. Riverside County Court House 14th St Riverside Community Hospital Calvary Presbyterian Church Parking Lot (nearest stop 14th & v Magnolia) Terracina Dr central ,1.5. Ramona Dr Administrative Riverside Center Hall oflustke 12th St. T 14th & Magnolia 0®® 50 T Riverside Sports Clinic Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information 0 Stop Riverside CityCollege T Magnolia & Terracina =Kiln 50 51 Crest Cruiser UCR - Canyon Crest Towne Centre Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, MLK Day, Presidents Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Route operates on UCR academic days only. Will not operate June 15 to Sept. 20. T University Village& Village Towers Apts IO 14 16 T Chicago & University Q® 14 16 ®® Andulka Park Rite -Aid Library Riverside County Workforce Center K-Mart Stater Brothers SpNce so r 3�O T Iowa&Blaine Iml® 10 Village Towers Riverside Citibank Sports cz. Apartments Complexv ' Unive ` villag Blaine St T Up/der Bannockburn Food4Less sltyAy lrllage Bank of America �+ Post Office ,r yK8/vd assarSt UCR T UCR at Bannockburn loll 204 c T UCR Lot 30 SunLine 220 RIVERSIDE • Central & Chicago ®® Centralgpe Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information Q Stop o' <ct �o Ralph's Allie's Hallmark Post Office Rite -Aid Lot Crest D 4148/v, Monte Uista or Via Pueblo T Canyon Crest & Central Eill 16 Canyon Crest Towne Centre 52 Hunter Park Metrolink Station to UCR Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: University Village Towers, University Plaza Apartments, Riverside Sports Center. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 1 Marlborough Ave n )) Riverside City College Culinary Academy Spruce St « Massachusetts Ave Blaine St my«lu METROLINK Hunter Park Metrolink Station n n Linden St University Village Towers Regency Theatres University Ave (( Riverside Sports Center University Plaza Apartments v ES 55 Promenade Mall - Harveston EVERYONE RID Routing and timetables subject to Mange. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Also serving: Chaparral High School, Ysabel Barnett Elementary School, Abbott, Promenade Mall, Harveston and County Center Drive. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. No service June 8 to August 11. ld TEMECULA P��a (Li a, owe T Equity Dr &Ynez Rd ®m® EIEI 79 61 Fj �a Equity Dr N } CO C T County Center Drive 23 24 61 79 55 Ysabel Q� Burnett woest0\ '°t Grace Mellman Community Library Extended Stay America a�AtSo °��a Sr «rownshipRd 3g Rustic Glen Dr y Haraston y The Promenade at Temecula �Psto Palm Plaza Shopping Centel tee Abbot Best Laboramri Western Legend I Map not to scale Qs Stop 0 Transfer Point and Information l‘ Chaparral H.S. 02 Rancho Temecula Town Center 4-0 4s'?d T Promenade Mall Parking Structure ® 79 202 206 208 MEI Overland Dr Imo p wy 9d,. 61 Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Sun City - Menifee - Murrieta - Temecula Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site www.RiversideTransit.com Also serving: Sun City Center, Loma Linda Medical Building. No service on Sundays or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. SUN CITY T Cherry Hills & Bradley ® 40 61 m McCall Blvd 5 T `a_ • Sun City Libra oc c 0- 0- a a 6 Encanto Dr Menifee City Hall Newport Rd La Piedra Rd Countryside - La Piedra Rearketplace a Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information T MSJC Menifee m 61 tot Mapleton St» Keller Rd» T 4 MSK Menifee z Scott Rd .f' Ba «Gladiolus Ave Loma Linda University g Medical Center a Oooa� ,5 MURRIETA T Equity &Ynez 79 Target Linnel Ln 3 linton Keith Rd 3 w Vi• sta Murrieta 22 H.S. 2 r Rancho Springs Medical Center \pSP\a Domenlgoni Pkwy MENIFEE T Los Alamos & Hancock 61 SpringsuiRd t d 9d d t s 9°, Count P nterb Murrieta Hot Springs Rd • BOO Temecula TEMECULA promenade Mall �Mac9at\�a� 7 24 61 T County Center ®m® 79 61 74 Information Center San Jacinto - Hemet - Sun City - Perris (951)565-5002 Web site 1 Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Mt. San Jacinto College 6 T Also serving: Hemet Valley Mall. No service on Sundays or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. San Jacinto H. Super Walmart San Jacinto Ave T ..... . San S\�aJacinto spa rnrCenter Qa� OPSS State st SAN JACINTO T Mt. San Jacinto College I®I® 74 EMI � O estbound only — 0 T San Jacinto & Esplanade El=El HEMET Lyon Ave E `a Eastbound only Gilmore St 0 d Kirby St T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® ®I® 74 79 • T Hemet Valley Mall Sanderson Ave a• Super Walmart -o LL 2, • Warren Rd 42 T Sanderson & Thornton 74 79 T West Valley H.S. WINCNESTE• R a Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information O Medical Facility PERRIS I x¢ N C St Perris Station Transit Center Perris Blvd t c� era E 171 Winchester Rd T 4 Post Office T Simpson & Winchester 74 79 CC MENIF E E Menifee Rd» Menifee Valley Medical Center a m � Sun City Library 2 Murrieta Rd • Perris Station Transit Center MEI 30 Im MEI 19 208 Sun City Blvd SUN CITY T 03 T MSJC Menifee 9 O� l 61 74 Menifee Community Center and Park Antelope Rd» Bradley Rd s 3 Mt. San Jacinto • College/ Menifee T 3 Menifee Countryside Marketplace 41, Cherry Hills & Bradley m 40 61 74 CC Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Hemet -Winchester -Temecula Information Center (951)565-5002 Web site r. Also serving: Hemet Valley Mall. No service on Sundays or on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Simpson & Winchester m 79 If Winchester Rd & Simpson Rd Winchester Rd & Pourroy Rd/Whispering» Heights WINCHESTER T Equity &Ynez ® 24 El 79 T Sanderson & Thornton ®m 79 Post Office Simpson 8 7 �. Briggs Rd MURRIETA erhn9/09yol, Hpt�lioy County Center ,47/2gs„ T ® 24 El 61 79 toty �t Chaparral H.S. O� z i l� a County Center Dr ` 3 T Grace Mellman Community Library \aAt w `T Rancho California Rd Temecula Stage Stop 6th & Front 1 bth t (6 2 cc 0 0 N 3 79 0- 44 5 T • Target Super • Walmart • Mustang Wy Pourro Rd c ;v Algrave Ave>. West Valley H.5. Ygvse* 0 Thompson Rd « Benton Rd MTemeku St agdas Coloradas S Auld Rd French Valley Airport O� o� c� Lm y- Nicolas Rd 6 T 74 Devonshire Av Y �9 T Florida Ave Hemet • e Valley • Mall : HEMET • T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® ®® 74 79 FRENCH VALLEY Southwest Justice Center Sheriff Station 42 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information T Winchester& Nicolas 79 TEMECULA T Promenade Mall Parking Structure Promenade Mall T 79 202 206 208 217 T Temecula Stage Stop m 79 m°r2Rd R Routing and timetables subject to change. Rotas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. Murrieta - Temecula - Oceanside Transit Center $3.00GEN. FARE EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS No service on weekends or the following holidays: No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Walmart 202 206 MURRIETA RIVERSIDE COUNTY Murrieta Hot springs Rd o- 0 T 5 Walmart TEMECULA T Promenade Mall Parking Structure ® 79 202 206 208 ® Abbott Vastula Rancho California Rd» SAN DIEGO COUNTY Town Center North 0 atie' eat 5 �e l P A°o�f�°ac OCEANSIDE Oceanside Transit Center T 76 2itt R_ s( o� dJ?4, y METROLINK • �L • a T Town Center North 202 T Oceanside Transit Center Coaster NCTD Gre hound Amtrak California Sprinter/Metrolink 4' T 3 76 es4,‘" Ako�r "°Oo T 4 0 Promenade Mall 3 Park -And -Ride Lot 19 FALLBROOK Legend I Maps not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information Os Stop Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. 20 Riverside - Montclair Transcenter $3.00 :MN FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horados son sujetos a cambios. C.> No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Rivers•de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®® ® 16 El 29 14 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 216 SunLine 220 • Downtown Terminal « Iowa Ave ',`�� Country Village Park -And -Ride Mission Blvd Pedley Rd Market St f RIVERSIDE «Canyon Crest Dr T UCR at Bannockburn 0® 5 T MontclairTranscenter Foothill Transit Omnitrans 65, 66, 67, 68, 80, 82 MONTCLAIR Z MonteVtsto Ave si • 0 v 0 z Central Ave 0 z cc CC z M▪ illiken Ave ONTARIO Plaza METROLINK Montclair Transcenter Ontario Mills Mall T Ontario Mills Mall Mulberry Ave Southbound Stop NB at Country Village Rd & Country Club Dr. Omnitrans 61 Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information 0 Stop 206 Temecula - Murrieta - Lake Elsinore - Corona Metrolink $ 3.00GEN. FARE EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O E i No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Corona Transit Center o© MEIROLINK T 6 E. Grand Blvd 206 216 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red Corona Transit Center 15 G� ?o�9G Q\�Qg e ado Temescal Canyon Tom's Farms LAKE ELSINORE Legend I Maps not to scale OTime and/orTransferPoint OTransfer Point and Information CORONA d� „CaN6" a Dos Lagos Dos Lagos Dr Rd 4 5 �Cen„< Lake Elsinore Outlet Center MutHetaHot SprIngsR MURRIETAd%, T Outlet Center El 8 El T 2 P . almart T Walmart 202 206 206 d mchesNetAa9d/fd�a TEMECULA Promenade Mall . T 1 T Promenade Mall Parking Structure 111 79 202 206 208 20 3.0 Temecula - Murrieta - Sun City - Perris GEN. FARE 0 EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS Moreno Valley - Downtown Terminal Riverside Downtown Terminal JCR Lot 30 9� T 8 tiR 7 R Riverside Downtown Terminal 15 16 22 29 49 204 208 210 212 216 Omn trans 215 SunLine 220 MLK Blvd Riverside ETROLI"`Downtown Metrolink Station RIVERSIDE • Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station 0 16 208 210 Ell SunLine 220 Amtrak Perris Station Transit Center ®® 30 m EMI 19 208 •' 6s 6N S't Moreno Valley Mall San Jacinto Ave NB/SB COB Also serving: Riverside City Hall and County Administration Building. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Moreno Valley Mall m 16 18 19 208 210 SunLine 220 PERRIS Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. MORENO VALLEY 4 Sun City &McCall ECM 40 61 74 208 Perris Station 4th St sB Transit Center Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information cm Alternate Routing MCC II Blvd gm Cherry Hills Blvd MURRIETA • Los Alamos & Whitewood 131 208 Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. T Promenade Mall Parking Structure ® 79 202 206 208 11111 SUN CITY MENIFEE 2ts V�a Los Alamos Rd & Whitewood Rd beS`Q`�a Promenade Mall TEMECULA NLIRiverside Downtown Terminal SEE FARE GRID BELOW 21 0/22 O to Palm Desert FOR ROUTE PRICING �O Also serving: Riverside City Hall, County Admin. Building. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. T Riverside - DowntownMetrolinkStation 0 16 208 210 Ell SunLine 220 Amtrak Metrolink Z t MVM UCR T Fir &Nason 210 SunLine 220 T Riverside Downtown Terminal 15 16 22 204 208 210 29 49 212 216 Omnitrans215 SunLine 220 ZONE CABAZON - RIVERSIDE Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Beaumont Casino Walmart Morongo , SunLine 7 Transit Hub (Varner& Harry Oliver • Trail) T Moreno Valley Mall m 16 18 19 208 210 SunLine 220 ZONE 2 PALM DESERT - THOUSAND PALMS Palm Desert Mall (Town Center Way & Hahn Rd) 2 Hemet - San Jacinto - Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station - Downtown Terminal $3.00 MT: WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. N Also serving: Riverside City Hall and Riverside County Administration Building, MSJC. No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Riverside Downtown Terminal m RIVERSIDE METROIN • Riverside - ' Downtown Metrolink Station T Perris Station Transit Center 19 208 EDE ®® 30 74 • a Perris Station Transit Center T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®®m ® 16 El UCR Lot • 30 29 49 204 208 210 Omnitrans 215 216 SunLine 220 T Riverside - DowntownMetrolinkStation 0 16 208 210 EiEl SunLine 220 Amtrak MORENO m VALLEY PERRIS ROUTE MAY BE DEVIATED DUE TO TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information • Stop 74 Hemet Transit Depot T Mt. San Jacinto College ®® 74 ®® SAN JACINTO T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®® ®® 74 79 Hemet Valley "4tall'. TO \�a4 :. rd `9 . `ti "99F•.: 9 HEMET 42 Mt San Jacinto College 5� 5� co d `'9 T t Riverside Downtown Terminal to Village at Orange $ 3.0 vGEN. FARE EACH WAY FREE WITH VALID METROLINK PASS 216 Heim Ave East Portion of 216 T Galleria at Tyler 0 10 ®® ®®® 216 Also serving: Riverside, The Galleria at Tyler, Corona, and Village at Orange, Orange County. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. West Portion of 216 Route may be deviated due to traffic conditions. Routing and timetables subject to change. O T Corona Transit Center Q© 206 21 T Rivers'de Downtown Terminal 0 10 ®® 14 ® 16 ® 29 49 204 208 210 ® 216 Galleria at Tyler C~d Corona �o:;p Park -And- o Ride ' CORONA < Continued above Omnitrans 215 SunLine 220 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red iv Corona Transit Corona Center And - Ride METROLINK CORONA Continued below> Riverside Downtown Terminal Legend I Map not to scale 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information O Park -And -Ride a Long-term Detour Routing San Jacinto - Hemet - Temecula - Escondido GEN. FARE $�oOO EACH WAY Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O No service on weekends or the following holidays: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. • Mt. San Jacinto College ®®0®® T Hemet Valley Mall ®®®®m m 79 ®® Legend I Maps not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information OS Stop ® Alternate Routing MURRIETA County Center Dr uity DJ 3 T Equity&Ynez ® 24 ri 61 79 ESCONDIDO ¢Qa S rS 79 0 0 Stetson Ave Hemet Valley Mall 01) Mt. San Jacinto College 0.1 CO 5 Esplanade Ave Devonshire Ave T 4 Lath* Ave Florida Ave Y INSET MAP ARE4 Domenigoni Pkwy HEMET INSET MAP a' Devonshire Ave c , Hemet Valley Y Mall Hemet Transit Depot Florida Ave 0 E v, Latham Ave T Promenade Mall Parking Structure ® 79 202 206 208 IgiEl Promenade 'vial! „as pV+ ,M°s0s TEMECULA a149arotand ROUTE MAY BE DEVIATED DUE TO TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ♦ Escondido Transit Center MEI NCTD MTS Gre hound Escondido City Hall Escondido Transit Center OCTA 794/ 794A La Sierra Metrolink or Canyon Community Church - South Coast Metro $6.00 WAY Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. La Sierra Metrolink Station Route operated by OCTA. Also serving: Canyon Community Church Park and Ride and Hutton Centre. Runs Weekdays only. No service on: New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 1 T 91 RIVERSIDE T La Sierra Metrolink Station El OCTA 794 CORONA o: Main St 91 Q 15 2 PR Canyon Community Church Park and Ride • 241 ANAHEIM ORANGE 55 Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information ® 794A connection from Corona PR Park -And -Ride Hutton Centre SANTA A N A • South Coast Plaza Park And Ride OCTA 51, 55, 57, 76, 86,145,172, 173, 211, 216, 464, 794 South Coast T v 5 Plaza Park And Ride 3 4 IRV COSTA MESA South Coast Metro Srtifilme TRANSIT AGENCY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2015/16 - FY 2017/18 FINAL DRAFT SunLine Transit Agency FY2015/16 - FY 2017/18 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN "Today's Transit for Tomorrow's World" CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1-2 CHAPTER 1— SYSTEM OVERVIEW 3 1.1 Description of Service Area 3-5 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projection 6 1.3 Fixed Route Transit and Paratransit Services 6-23 1.4 Current Fare Structure 24 1.5 Revenue Fleet 25 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities 26 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies 26 1.8 Taxi Administration 27 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 28 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Evaluation and Analysis 28-29 2.2 Paratransit Service — System Performance 29-30 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 30 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts 30 2.5 Service Standards and Warrants 30-31 2.6 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth over Next Two Years 31 2.7 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 31-33 CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 34 3.1 Recent Service Changes 34 3.2 Recommended Short Term Service Improvements 34-35 3.3 Longer Term Service Modifications and Adjustments 35 3.4 Marketing and Promotion 36 3.5 Budget Impacts on Proposed Changes 36 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 37 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 37 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program 37 4.2.A Operating Budget 38 4.2.6 Capital Improvement Program Budget 39 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 39-40 FIGURES Figure 1.1 SunLine Transit Agency Service Area 4 Figure 1.2 SunBus System Map 5 Figure 2 SunBus Fare Structure 24 Figure 3 SunDial Fare Structure 24 Figure 4 Analysis of FY 2013/14 Performance Statistics 28 Figure 5 Comparison of Fixed Route Ridership FY 2009/10 to FY 2013/14 29 Figure 6 Comparison of SunDial Ridership FY2012/13 to FY2013/14 29 Figure 7 Comparison of SunDial Ridership FY 2009/10 to FY 2013/14 29 TABLES Table 1 Fleet Inventory 41-43 Table 2 Service Summary 44-49 Table 3 Route Statistics 50-52 Table 3A Individual Route Description 53-54 Table 3B FY 2015/16 New/Existing Routes Exemption Sheet 55-56 Table 4 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 57-58 Table 4A Capital Project Justification for FY 2015/16 59-70 Table 5.1 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 71-72 Table 5.1.A Capital Project Justification for FY 2016/17 73-82 Table 5.2 Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 83-84 Table 5.2.A Capital Project Justification for FY 2017/18 85-93 Table 6 Progress to Implement TDA Performance Audit ... 94-95 Table 7 Service Provider Performance Targets 96-97 Table 8 Performance Report 98-99 Table 9 Highlights of FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan 100-101 Table 9A Operating and Financial Data 101 Table 9B Farebox Calculation 102 INTRODUCTION The Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 through 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) sets the objectives for SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) transit services and capital projects in the Coachella Valley. The SRTP is developed within the context of the regional planning process aimed at implementing SunLine's participation in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP). The development of the SRTP is essential in that it enables staff to fulfill directions from SunLine's Board of Directors and the agency's mission. The FY 2015/16 through 2017/18 SRTP presents a tactical plan for service improvements and capital projects to achieve the objective of the mission statement. The SRTP is submitted to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) annually for approval and upon approval will set the framework for requests for federal funds as required by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and meet the requirements of the State of California Transportation Development Act (TDA). MISSION STATEMENT To provide safe and environmentally conscious public transportation services and alternate fuel solutions to meet the mobility needs of the Coachella Valley. The SRTP is a three-year capital and operating plan which is approved by SunLine's Board of Directors and RCTC. RCTC is responsible for oversight, funding and coordination of all public transportation services in Riverside County. Although the SRTP is a three-year plan, only the first year of the plan is funded with the remaining two years provided for planning purposes. The SRTP consists of information on SunLine's services and operating characteristics and the annual budget, which is incorporated in the RTIP, State Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), and Federal Transportation Improvement Plan (FTIP). SunLine had a number of key accomplishments in FY 2014/15, including the extension of Line 15 service to Desert Edge, the extension of Line 80 service to a new commercial development in North Indio, and the grand opening of both a state-of-the-art administration building and a transit center in SunLine's Thousand Palms site. For FY 2015/16, SunLine plans to implement service improvements across the network, including service frequency improvements for existing transit lines, extensions of existing lines, and the introduction of a new route. This is made possible with the continued improvement in the economy and associated growth in sales tax revenue available for SunLine, as well as through the award of federal grants. A new Line 20 is planned to be introduced between the Cities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Desert via Interstate 10, in addition to an extension of Lines 70 and 111 to better serve the cities and communities of the Coachella Valley. SunLine staff has also identified the need for weekend service on Line 95. For the subsequent FY 2016/17 and 2017/18, SunLine will continue to monitor predicted funding levels to determine when additional service can be provided on the existing transit lines and any new lines where sufficient demand exists. Based on data from the 2010 United States Census, the population of the Coachella Valley within 0.75 miles of the SunLine transit route network grew from 216,374 in 2000 to 281,189 in 2010, a 30 percent increase, while the Coachella Valley's overall population grew by 39 percent in the same period. The 1 latest estimate' of the Valley's nine (9) incorporated cities' population was 366,594 as of July 1, 2013, up 1.2 percent from 362,137 one year earlier. The agency finished FY 2013/14 with total passenger boardings reaching 4.8 million, up from 4.7 million in FY 2012/13. Projections by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) continue to suggest the population of the Coachella Valley will more than double the 2010 population by 2035. This suggests a significantly larger future role for SunLine in both providing a valuable mobility alternative to the private car and providing quality service for those who rely upon public transit in the Coachella Valley. ' Annual Estimates of the Resident Population, U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division — May 2014 2 CHAPTER 1- SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area SunLine is a Joint Powers Authority created in 1977 to provide public transit service to its nine member cities and seven (7) unincorporated communities in the Coachella Valley. Member cities are Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Indio, and Coachella, with service also provided to the unincorporated Riverside County communities of Desert Edge, Thousand Palms, Bermuda Dunes, Thermal, Mecca, Oasis and North Shore. SunLine's Board of Directors consists of elected officials from each of the nine member cities and Riverside County, who provide policy direction to the General Manager and staff. The Board meets ten times per year, and if necessary may meet additional times to address pressing operational and budget issues. SunLine's service area is 1,120 square miles with transit service offered throughout the urbanized areas and larger unincorporated communities of the Coachella Valley. The Agency's service area is located approximately 120 miles east of downtown Los Angeles and 60 miles east of the Inland Empire cities of Riverside and San Bernardino. The service area is bounded by the San Gorgonio Pass on the west and the Salton Sea on the southeast. The SunLine Service Area is shown in Figure 1.1. SunLine's local fixed route network (SunBus) currently consists of 15 routes in total, including 14 local routes connecting the Valley from Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs in the northwest to Mecca, Oasis, and North Shore in the southeast, as well as one Commuter Link route operating between Palm Desert and Riverside. Buses operate 363 days a year, with no service provided on Thanksgiving and Christmas. Weekend service is operated on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, and Labor Day. The span of service extends from 4:32 a.m. to 11:23 p.m. on weekdays and 4:55 a.m. to 10:48 p.m. on weekends. Buses generally operate every 20 to 90 minutes, depending on the route and day of the week. Line 95 to the rural community of North Shore is an exception, making five inbound and outbound trips per day on weekdays only. Line 111 is the major trunk line that extends from Indio to Palm Springs, with most routes feeding to and from this key route. A system map is shown in Figure 1.2 and service information on each route is discussed in Section 1.3. SunLine conducted a fixed route passenger survey in November 2014 to provide an accurate current assessment of SunBus passengers, their travel patterns and their views on the service SunLine provides. The survey found that 84 percent of SunBus passengers are dependent on SunLine service, with 73 percent of respondents using transit four times a week or more. SunBus passengers are generally low- income, with 76 percent of passengers having annual household incomes below $25,000. Spanish is the primary language spoken in 47 percent of SunBus passengers' homes. SunBus passengers' top three trip purposes are for work at 35 percent, shopping at 16 percent, and school at 14 percent. Many commuter trips within the Coachella Valley are destined for the City of Palm Desert, with 23 percent of all work trips ending there. Data compiled for trip purposes show that commuting patterns to Palm Desert are mostly from the Cities of Cathedral City, Indio, La Quinta, and Palm Springs. There are also strong commuting patterns from La Quinta and Coachella to Indio, and from Desert Hot Springs to Palm Springs. Most commute trips in the system occur along Highway 111, with nearly all destinations served directly by Line 111. Line 14 (Desert Hot Springs — Palm Springs) and Line 30 (Cathedral City — Palm Springs) are also key SunLine regional transit lines. With respect to school travel, Palm Desert continues to be a key destination as the location of the main campus of the College of the Desert. A number of school districts in the region do not provide school bus service for high school students, with SunLine serving as the primary means of high school transportation in many areas. 3 u nLiane Service Area SAN MANNACHNo COUNTY iA!osilkgf re. rf I SunLine Service Area 1,120 $quare M!!vs 9untine Network City Boundary Community Council Area . n.ma w.. no ,,,..r. , 0 2.5 6 10 0INE= -{ usememoi Wel {too SAN lijc nY 'y7 111Yen NVe COUNTY clwur r a.____1 .r nnLL, 2014 Een, Souroee'. Een, USGS, NOAA STOZ Aaenuer `ea.n/ aDyuaS ADua2v 1pueal aununS T1 mnpid FIGURE 1.2 SunBus System Map, January 2015 MISSION LAKES DESERT M4°' ST HOT I PIERSON SPRINGS HACIENDA a VlAv �sH TVVO BUNCH PALMS ROSA PAWS SAN RAFAEL STEVENS [7 n BAR ISTO PALM SPRINGS } J � DESERT p6iLLON SoEDGE 142l .� � wyRpAJ i a ��Fps 5 'pJ -1 d VISTACHINO 7 to AVE 20 5 ` mUJ Q: CATHEDRAL BST- CITY ng m A DINAH SHORE GERALD FORD FRANK SINATRA RANCHO MIRAGE PALM z DESERT g COMMUTER LINK 220 • Palm Desert to Riverside Q,N taw rn o THOUSAND PALMS KAViER IGH sc"" 01 GERALD FORD 4FQ Sp9Ttc ra COUNTRY CLUB HARRIS HOVLEY 62 z Q FRED WAKING 3 a a 1NDIAN w WELLS AVE 47 RIVERSIDE UCR MORENO VALLEY BEAUMONT CARAZON Wal Mart See schedule for details of step locations • CaWlzon to Riverside ■ THOUSAND PALMS PALM DESERT f ZONE 2-Is. Palm Desert to Thousand Palms Effective vni5 stiatiS System Map Mapa del Sistema BERMUDA DUNES z ❑ MADRID LA ()UINTA TAMPICO INDIO W AVE 42 q rT AVE 72 NORTH SHORE a AVE 52 O rll K cc x. OASIS ,&wFSFATFs T !art +e COACHELLA m Palk; cl-NACe AVE $@ THERMAL MECCA AVE Se AVE 70 6 m m { COD rrrerI v AVE S2 S' ST FAY CENLTH TER NORTH SHORE 5 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projection A review of cities with the highest population increase from 2000 through 2010 indicates that the City of Coachella grew by 79% followed by the Cities of La Quinta, Indio, Desert Hot Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Indian Wells. According to the State Department of Finance data sources, more than 70,000 people moved to the aforementioned cities, with the Cities of Indio and Coachella gaining the most. Overall, the population in the Coachella Valley continues to grow (though more slowly in the last six years) and this growth has helped SunLine achieve over 4.8 million passenger boardings in FY 2013/14, setting a new annual ridership record. 1.3 Fixed Route Transit and Paratransit Services FIXED ROUTE SERVICE • Regional Services —These are highly traveled corridors that serve a variety of trip purposes and connect a variety of regional destinations. These routes also comprise the backbone of the network linking major communities. Examples include Line 111 with a 20 minute headway seven days a weeks, which travels from Palm Springs to Indio, Line 14 between Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs, and Line 30 between Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Lines 14 and 30 operate with 20 minute frequencies on weekdays; however, SunLine has a longer term goal of increasing the frequency of these routes to every 15 minutes on weekdays. • Local Community -Based Services — These routes are established to provide benefits for one or more local communities and offer all -day circulation as well as connections to regional services. Lines 15, 24, 32, 53, 54, 70, 80, 81, 90, 91, and 95 are examples of this type of service. These routes should have consistent service throughout each day, have frequencies of 60 minutes or better, and have frequent stops for passengers to access as many destinations as possible. A number of these local services are performing strongly both in terms of ridership and productivity (rides per hour of service), and are candidates for increased service levels based on prioritization of all needs and available funding. An exception to the above frequency policy is the North Shore Line 95 rural service, which was introduced in FY 2013/14 and operates five round trips weekdays between Indio, Coachella, Thermal, Mecca, and North Shore. • Market -Based Services — These types of services are tailored to serve specific market segments at specific times of the day, including supplemental service such as school trippers. These routes have flexible routing and schedules, may vary throughout the day and week, and are tailored to specific market targets and defined market needs. An example of this service is the Commuter Link 220, operating two westbound trips from Palm Desert to Riverside weekday mornings with two return trips weekday evenings. Information about each of SunLine's existing fixed route services, as well as proposed new services and service enhancements, are provided on subsequent pages. 6 LINE 14: DESERT HOT SPRINGS — PALM SPRINGS Line 14 links the Cities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs. This route connects to Lines 15, 24, 30, 32, and 111 and links riders with local shopping centers, middle and high schools, and other services within the communities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs. Line 14 also offers service to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the Employment Development Department, and a number of retail centers along the route. Line 14 operates with 20 minute frequency during weekday daytime periods, 30 minute frequency weekday evenings (plus one extra morning and afternoon trips to accommodate the additional volume of school students), and 40 minute frequency on weekends. Service span is 4:52 am to 11:23 pm on weekdays and 5:45 am to 10:43 pm on weekends. Service frequency, service span, and route alignment are not proposed to be changed for FY 2015/16. DESERT HOT SPRINGS MISSION LAKES i— co TWO BUNCH PALMS VISTA CHINO J J W W Et LL z } U U cn J Q d z TAHOUITZ ci BARISTO RAMON PIERSON HACIENDA DILLON 2 J Q tl J Q' I- W ct Z H W p CO PALM SPRINGS N A DON ENGLISH O TIME POINT rrn SELECTED TRIPS ONLY 7 LINE 15: DESERT HOT SPRINGS — DESERT EDGE Line 15 was introduced in September 2010 to serve the community of Desert Hot Springs. In FY 2014/15, Line 15 was extended to serve Desert Edge, an unincorporated community located southeast of Desert Hot Springs. This route connects to Line 14 as well as links riders with local shopping centers, a community center, middle and high schools, and other services provided within the City of Desert Hot Springs. The route operates with 60 minute frequency seven days a week. Service span is 4:54 am to 8:49 pm on weekdays and 6:49 am to 7:44 pm on weekends. Service frequency, service span, and route alignment are not proposed to be changed for FY 2015/16. cri w 4T" ST PIERSON TWO BUNCH PALMS NA DESERT HOT SPRINGS HACIENDA O TIME POINT �� 4 00=044/ LONG CYN DESERT EDGE J_ cc O cn DILLON v O ji J 0 Z AURORA g 8 LINE 20: DESERT HOT SPRINGS — THOUSAND PALMS — PALM DESERT Line 20 is a new service scheduled to begin in FY 2015/16 which will provide enhanced connections between the City of Desert Hot Springs and the City of Palm Desert. This route will enable residents of Desert Hot Springs and the surrounding communities improved access to resources and opportunities concentrated toward the center of the Coachella Valley. Line 20 will connect with Lines 14, 15, 32, 53, 54, and 111. This service is proposed to operate with 55 minute frequency during weekday peak periods with four morning trips and four afternoon trips. No weekend service is planned to be provided at the time of service introduction, as weekday service will need to be evaluated in order to determine whether weekend service is viable. Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding was awarded to operate this service. Implementation of this service is subject to Board approval but is included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. MISSION LAKES i7 DESERT HOT SPRINGS PIERSON N A O TILE POINT PLANNED NEW ROUTE E THOUSAND PALMS SUNL NE V�RryFRTRANSUHie RANCHO MIRAGE TOWN CENTER �o HAHN_„,, MONTEREY PALM DESERT FRED WARING HWY 111 9 LINE 24: PALM SPRINGS Line 24 offers service in Palm Springs with connections available with Lines 14, 30, and 111. This route links riders to destinations such as the Desert Regional Hospital, Palm Springs International Airport, Palm Springs City Hall, Desert Highland Community Center, middle and high schools, and a number of key retail outlets. Line 24 operates with 40 minute frequency on weekdays and 60 minute frequency on weekends, plus one morning and three afternoon supplementary trips to accommodate student ridership. Service span is 6:20 am to 8:25 pm on weekdays and 6:23 am to 7:44 pm on weekends. Line 24 is proposed to extend service to Ramon Road/San Luis Rey retail area in conjunction with a proposed improvement of Line 32 frequency to 40 minutes on weekdays. This will improve access for Palm Springs residents to the public services and retail in this area. This change is subject to available budget and Board approval and is not included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. CURRENT 0 w SPA' ROSA PARKS R❑ p�E G NA STEVENS TACHEVAH U a O TIME POINT SAN RAFAEL VISTA CHINO TAHQUITZ BARISTO PALM SPRINGS 0 0 ROSA PARKS STEVENS TACHEVAH O TIEFOINT 2 PLANNED SAN RAFAEL RACQUET CLUB U VISTA CHINO BARISTO PALM SPRINGS RAMON } w 15 MISSION C7 10 LINE 30: CATHEDRAL CITY — PALM SPRINGS Line 30 provides a key regional link between the Cities of Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Within these communities, riders are able to access city libraries, city halls, senior centers, middle and high schools, and various commercial and industrial centers. Line 30 connects to Lines 14, 24, 32, and 111. Line 30 operates with 20 minute frequency on weekdays with three afternoon supplementary trips to accommodate the additional volume of school students. Frequency is 30 minutes on weekday evenings and 40 minutes on weekends. Service span is 5:19 am to 10:44 pm on weekdays and 6:12 am to 9:40 pm on weekends. Service frequency, service span, and route alignment are not proposed to be changed for FY 2015/16; however, the potential of a connection to Palm Springs Airport is planned to be evaluated during FY 2015/16. This change is subject to available budget and Board approval and is not included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. U 4 a CURRENT BARISTO BARISTO INDIAN CY PALM SPRINGS A O TIME POINT B STD RAMON CATHEDRAL CYN CATHEDRAL C ITY DINAH SHORE CATHEDRAL CITY PLANNED TAHQUITZ �3 % ElARISTO BARISTO RAMON PALM SPRINGS A O TIME POINT RAMON B ST LL CATHEDRAL N CITY w OINAH SHORE z aU K 0 L o r FR, CATHEDRAL CITY 11 LINE 32: PALM SPRINGS — CATHEDRAL CITY — THOUSAND PALMS — RANCHO MIRAGE — PALM DESERT Line 32 links the Cities of Palm Springs and Cathedral City with the community of Thousand Palms and the Cities of Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert. This route connects with Lines 14, 30, 53, 54, 111, and 220. Riders can access the elementary, middle and high schools, and various retail centers along Ramon Road in Cathedral City. Routing over the Monterey/I-10 Interchange provides access to Costco, Home Depot, and the Regal Cinemas 16 theater complex, as well as service to the Agua Caliente Casino on Ramon Road at Bob Hope Drive. This route also provides service to the Eisenhower Medical Center, College of the Desert, and Westfield Palm Desert Mall. Line 32 operates with 50 minute frequency on weekdays and 60 minute frequency on weekends. Service span is 5:07 am to 10:41 pm on weekdays and 6:54 am to 10:48 pm on weekends. Weekday frequency improvement to every 40 minutes in coordination with a change to Line 24 mentioned previously is being proposed. This will provide extra capacity for the growing ridership on this line. This change is subject to available budget and Board approval and is not included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. VISTA CHINO r w ix zu) ¢m 0 J PALM SPRINGS O TIME POINT a J J Q d' Q 2 NA a w if THOUSAND ¢o PALMS ECIt J Liw RAMON °Da CATHEDRAL CITY RANCHO MIRAGE DINAH SHORE cc o a O x m O co MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB JOHN L SINN PALM HAHN DESERT w cc w r z 0 2 r z �1:c of H FRED WARING HWY 111 12 LINE 53: PALM DESERT Line 53 provides service within the City of Palm Desert, enabling riders to access the College of the Desert, the McCallum Theater, Palm Desert City Hall, Kaiser Permanente, satellite campuses of California State University San Bernardino (CSUSB), the University of California Riverside, Palm Desert High School, Palm Desert Library, and major shopping centers. Line 53 connects with Lines 32, 54, 111 and 220 at Westfield Palm Desert Mall. Line 53 operates with 60 minute frequency on weekdays and 80 minute frequency on weekends. One supplementary trip is provided on weekday afternoons to accommodate the additional volume of school students. Service span is 6:18 am to 6:46 pm on weekdays and 9:05 am to 6:22 pm on weekends. For FY 2015/16, the continuation of service to Xavier High School will be studied for service productivity. This change is subject to Board approval and is not included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. O a PALM DESERT GERALD FORD A COUNTRY CLUB FRED WARING Xavier High School INDIAN WELLS NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND FRED WARING N U d a CATALINA 4 Z co a m FRED WARING D O 0 4 an d a CATALINA Z 0 a 13 LINE 54: PALM DESERT — INDIAN WELLS — LA QUINTA — BERMUDA DUNES — INDIO Line 54 operates between Palm Desert and Indio serving the Cities of Indian Wells and La Quinta as well as the unincorporated community of Bermuda Dunes via Fred Waring Drive. This route was designed to provide faster service between Palm Desert and Indio, in addition to serving the length of Fred Waring Drive. Line 54 connects with Lines 32, 53, 70, 80, 81, 90, 91, 95, 111, and 220. Weekday frequencies are 45 minutes, with service operating between 6:00 am and 7:57 pm. No weekend service is provided at this time, as the weekday service is continuing to be studied to determine whether weekend service is viable. TOWN CENTER PALM DESERT O TIME POINT Y O O U N A FRED WARING z 0 t c� BERMUDA Q DUNES O INDIAN LA WELLS QUINTA JEFFERSON INDIO /4, w O `O a HOOVER w O tY z 0 HWY 111 z 0 co Y 0 Q REQUA 14 LINE 70: LA QUINTA — PALM DESERT — BERMUDA DUNES Line 70 offers bus service to the City of La Quinta and the edge of the Cities of Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and the unincorporated community of Bermuda Dunes. Riders are able to access the City Hall, the senior center in La Quinta, local schools, and various retail shopping centers along Adams Street, Avenue 47, and Washington Street. Connections can be made with Line 111 on Highway 111 at Adams Street. Line 70 operates with 45 minute frequency on weekdays and 90 minute frequency on weekends. Extra morning and afternoon trips are added to accommodate the high number of students utilizing this service. Service span is 5:15 am to 8:43 pm on weekdays and 5:15 am to 9:28 pm on weekends. SunLine plans to increase service frequency on this route to 40 minutes on weekdays and 60 minutes on weekends. At the same time, an extension of this transit line is planned to be implemented along Washington Street north of the 1-10 freeway to serve the many businesses and the entrance to Sun City Del Webb Community of nearly 10,000 residents (see map below). These proposed improvements are being made to accommodate high ridership and passengers requests for service north of the 1-10 freeway. These changes are subject to available budget and Board approval and is included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. HARMS LANE PALM DESERT INDIAN WELLS SINALOA OBREGON CURRENT COUNTRY CLUB BERMUDA DUNES ASHINGTON TAMPICO ENHOWER w BERMUDAS MADRID N A MILES BLACKHAWK WAY HWY 111 AVE 47 LA QUINTA LA QUINTA COVE O TIME POINT PLANNED LAS MONTANAS SUN CITY PALM DESERT EL DESIERTO COUNTRY CLUB HARRIS LANE PALM DESERT 1- z WILDCAT BERMUDA DUTIES Z 3 FRED WARING INDIAN WELLS HWy MILES BLACKHAWK WAY AVE 47 Z LA QUINTA N A AVE 50 TAMPICO SINALOA n z 2 O' w m 3 = LA QUINTA O Z COVE w MADRID 15 LINES 80 and 81: INDIO Lines 80 and 81 are loop routes that provide transit service to residents of the City of Indio, enabling passengers to access civic, educational and county offices, as well as public and social service offices. This includes John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Riverside County Fair & National Date Festival, Employment Development Department, East Valley College of the Desert campus, Riverside County social services offices, Department of Motor Vehicles, Martha's Village & Kitchen, Coachella Valley Cultural Museum, the Indio Senior and Teen Centers, library, local schools, and a variety of retail shopping centers within the community. Line 81 was introduced in January 2012 as a variation on one of the two directions of the Line 80 loop route. Line 80 was modified in FY 2014/15 to serve a wider area of North Indio via Monroe Street, Avenue 42, and Jackson Street, including the recently constructed Walmart Supercenter on Avenue 42 and Monroe Street. Lines 80 and 81 connect to Lines 54, 90, 91, 95, and 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 at Flower Street. These two lines operate with 60 minute frequency 7 days a week. Service span is 6:00 am to 8:44 pm on Line 80 and 5:35 am to 8:23 pm on Line 81. It is planned to increase service to 30 minute frequency on weekdays for both routes and extend service to Shadow Hills on Jefferson Street at Avenue 39. These changes are subject to available budget and Board approval and are not included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. LINE 80 CURRENT AVE 42 O TIME POINT SHOWCASE PKWY LINE 81 CURRENT INDIO INDIO VAN BUREN NA O TIME POINT HWY ill & FLOWER SunLlne's Indio Facility 16 LINE 90: INDIO — COACHELLA Line 90 serves the Cities of Coachella and Indio allowing passengers to access the Employment Development Department, Coachella City Hall, library, senior center, Boys & Girls Club, local schools, and shopping centers. Connections to Lines 54, 80, 81, 91, 95, and 111 occur at the transfer location on Highway 111 at Flower Street in Indio. In FY 2014/15, Line 90 was realigned to serve a newly -constructed Walmart Neighborhood Market on Jackson Street and Avenue 48. Line 90 operates with 35 minute frequency 7 days a week. Service span is 4:55 am to 10:11 pm on weekdays and 4:55 am to 9:01 pm on weekends. Upon the extension of Line 111 to Coachella, Line 91 is planned to be revised to follow the Line 90 alignment between Coachella and Indio. At this time, SunLine plans to study alternative means of providing local circulation within the City of Coachella to best complement the extended Line 111, as well as evaluating service frequencies to better tailor service to match anticipated changes in passenger demand on this route. These changes are subject to available budget and Board approval and are not included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. INDIO 0 Q U DR CARREON AVE 48 Z w CO z AVE 50 COACHELLA NA O TIME POINT AVE 52 HARRISON 2 F s "P? Gysfi� 'k" AVE 53 17 LINE 91: INDIO — COACHELLA — THERMAL — MECCA — OASIS Line 91 links the Cities of Indio and Coachella with the unincorporated communities of Thermal, Mecca, and Oasis. Riders on Line 91 are able to connect to Lines 54, 80, 81, 90, 95, and 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 and Flower Street in Indio. This allows passengers to access employment sites, medical, and shopping facilities. Line 91 also provides direct service to the East Valley Campus of the College of the Desert in Mecca. Line 91 currently operates with 60 minute frequency on weekdays and 80 minute frequency on weekends. Service span is 4:47 am to 10:17 pm on weekdays and 5:38 am to 9:34 pm on weekends. In conjunction with the proposed extension of Line 111 from Indio to Coachella, Line 91 is planned to have its route revised to match the Line 90 alignment between Harrison Street in the City of Coachella and the Indio transfer center. This change would complement rather than duplicate service provided by the extended Line 111 from Indio to Coachella along Indio Boulevard, while maintaining frequent service on the Line 90 alignment. These changes are subject to funding availability but are included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. SunLine is pursuing Caltrans Low -Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) grant funding for the proposed weekend frequency enhancements. Since February 2014, Line 91 has been operating on a long term detour in Thermal due to construction of the Airport Boulevard overpass over Grapefruit Boulevard and the Union Pacific Yuma Subdivision rail right-of-way. This is a two year project anticipated to be completed in early 2016, after which the regular route alignment will be restored in Thermal. CURRENT ¢ AIRPORT BLVD Y vPf O THERMAL a CHURCH MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES O TIME POINT PLANNED z wv o INDIO z O � DR CARREON AVE 48 Z W K AVE 50 Y ST N A Y 0 THERMAL a CHURCH COACHELLA -A4), e� L6 AIRPORT BLVO AVE 62 OASIS 5' ST AVE 66 MECCA MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES 18 LINE 95: INDIO — COACHELLA — MECCA — NORTH SHORE Line 95 serves the Cities of Indio and Coachella and the unincorporated communities of Mecca and North Shore. Passengers on Line 95 are able to connect to Lines 54, 80, 81, 90, 91, and 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 and Flower Street in Indio. This service allows passengers to access employment sites, medical, and shopping facilities. Line 95 operates with 180 minute frequency on weekdays, providing five round trips. Service span is 5:35 am to 8:50 pm. If proposed plans to extend Line 111 to Coachella are implemented, this service will be subject to change by terminating in Coachella as shown on the map below. This could allow for a revised schedule with a sixth round trip on weekdays. No weekend service is provided at this time. Since February 2014, Line 95 has been operating on a long term detour in Thermal due to construction of the Airport Boulevard overpass over Grapefruit Boulevard and the Union Pacific Yuma Subdivision rail right-of-way. Construction is planned to be completed in early 2016. SunLine staff has observed an increase in ridership along this route's detoured alignment and plans to evaluate the benefits of maintaining the detoured alignment upon the completion of construction. In addition, express revenue service replacing current deadhead operation to and from North Shore as well as weekend service is planned in FY 2015/16. This change is subject to available funding and Board approval but is included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. ORIGINAL CURRENT WITH DETOUR/PLANNED EEQUA U w INDIO HVYY 111 8 FLOWER SunLine s Indio Facility AVE 4a AVE 55 N A O TIMEPOINT 1m SELECTED TRIPS ONLY 9 w COACHELLA AVE 52 AIRPORT BLVD THERMAL WINDLASS NORTH SHORE G6rary COD MeccalThermal AVE 62 0 MECCA ST HOME AVE 66 �No NORTH SHORE 19 LINE 111: PALM SPRINGS — CATHEDRAL CITY — RANCHO MIRAGE — PALM DESERT — INDIAN WELLS — LA QUINTA — INDIO Line 111 provides service along Highway 111 from Palm Springs to Indio, linking with the Cities of Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and La Quinta. Line 111 enables riders to travel to destinations along the Highway 111 corridor and connects to every route in the SunLine system except for Line 15. Connecting routes include Lines 14, 24, 30, 32, 53, 54, 70, 80, 81, 90, 91, 95, and Commuter Link 220. This route links passengers with major retail and commercial centers, recreational attractions, museums, educational and medical institutions, municipal services, and county services. Line 111 operates with 20 minute frequency during weekday and weekend daytime periods, 30 minute frequency on weekday evenings, and 40 minute frequency on weekend mornings and evenings. Service span is 4:51 am to 10:54 pm on weekdays and 5:42 am to 10:30 pm on weekends. Line 111 is planned to be extended from Indio to Coachella in conjunction with the completion of a multimodal transit terminal in central Coachella; however, an interim extension will be evaluated with provisions for operators and a safe bus layover location in the central Coachella area. The planned extension is shown below. This change is subject to available funding and Board approval but is included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. CURRENT PLANNED VISTA CHfNO STEVENS i BAR ISM PALM SPRINGS O 'r,lE FORA' VISTA CHINO STEVENS BARISTO Z d U PALM SPRINGS A TAGHEVAH >w mK E PALM CYN L�rra B ST J CATHEDRAL CITY PALM DESERT CATHEDRAL CITY CATHEDRAL CITY RANCHO MIRAGE B ST Hp, PALM DESERT CATHEDRAL RANCHO MIRAGE 7, PALM DESERT INDIAN WELLS LA QUINTA PALM DESERT INDIAN WELLS LA QUINTA HWY III &FLOWER Sun Line's Indio FadYry Bus stops #1704 8 p8611 at Hey 111 8 La Quinta Ctr Dr are also served by AMTRAK HWY 111 INDIO INDIO INDIO INDIO Z 0 w COACHELLA it a -7 0 20 COMMUTER LINK 220: PALM DESERT — THOUSAND PALMS — CABAZON — BEAUMONT — MORENO VALLEY — RIVERSIDE Commuter Link 220 offers commuter service between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County in coordination with the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). Two westbound trips are operated weekday mornings, with two eastbound trips returning weekday evenings. The route is 77 miles long, and has two stops in the Coachella Valley, located at Westfield Palm Desert Mall and at the newly constructed Thousand Palms Transit Hub and park & ride facility located adjacent to SunLine's facilities along Varner Road in Thousand Palms. There are stops along Interstate 10 and State Route 60 serving the Cities of Cabazon, Beaumont, and Moreno Valley, as well as the University of California Riverside, Metrolink's Riverside Station, and the Riverside Downtown Terminal. Connections are available to SunLine Lines 32, 53, 54, and 111, Pass Transit in Beaumont, as well as Metrolink, RTA, and OmniTrans services in Riverside. Weekend service would only be considered if weekdays achieve ridership targets. Weekday service is planned to be increased through additional westbound/eastbound trips. However, this change is subject to available budget and Board approval and is included in the FY 2015/16 budget at this time. Riverside Downtown Terminal Metrolink Station UCR Lot 30 9 8 T RIVERSIDE MORENO VALLEY FARE ZONE i BEAUMONT WalMart CASINO MORONGO CABAZON Cabazon to Riverside ■ ■ V FARE ZONE 2 THOUSAND PALMS PALM DESERT Perm Desert to Thousand Palms 21 PARATRANSIT SERVICE SUNDIAL SunLine's paratransit service, SunDial, offers curb -to -curb service designed to meet requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and offers next -day complementary demand -response service to Coachella Valley residents who are unable to use fixed route service. All applicants must complete an application, describing in detail the nature of their mental or physical disability that would prevent them from using regular fixed route service. Applicants must obtain an approved health care professional's statement and signature verifying their disability. Each applicant is notified in writing of their application status within twenty-one days of their submission date. Certified riders that have the required ADA Certification Identification Card are eligible to use SunDial for their transportation needs, including medical appointments, shopping, and other social activities. SunDial service is available within 4 mile of the existing SunBus route network and is available by advanced reservation. Reservations may be made based on the service hours of the fixed routes serving passengers' origins and destinations. SunDial service is provided with a fleet of 31 vans seven days a week, 363 days a year during the same hours as the fixed route network. No service is provided on Thanksgiving and Christmas. SUNTAXI SunLine is working to establish a subsidized taxi service called SunTaxi to supplement SunDial in providing ADA paratransit service to the Coachella Valley. The SunTaxi program will make use of an existing taxi fleet, including accessible vehicles meeting ADA standards, that will be operated under contract by one or more qualified regional taxi operators selected under an open bidding process. SunTaxi will allow for more capacity to provide paratransit services in a cost effective manner to Coachella Valley residents. TAXI VOUCHERS In addition to SunDial and SunTaxi paratransit service, SunLine also offers a Taxi Voucher Program providing half price taxi trips for seniors (60+ years) and the disabled throughout the agency's service area by matching funds loaded onto a prepaid taxi fare payment card up to $75 per transaction. This program is funded in part through remaining federal New Freedom Section 5317 funds. 22 Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) As the designated CTSA, SunLine coordinates public transportation services throughout its service area, including providing mobility training and assisting with grant applications. Staff participates in meetings with social and human service agencies, bus riders, and other advocates through forums such as the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service Transportation Advisory Council, SunLine's ACCESS Advisory Committee, T-NOW, and neighboring transit operators. SunLine will continue to provide resources to support the volunteer driver mileage reimbursement and other travel programs in the Coachella Valley provided by Independent Living Partnership through remaining Section 5317 New Freedom funding for FY 2015/16. SunLine is committed to working with the ACCESS Advisory Committee and continues to facilitate monthly meetings held at the Thousand Palms main office. SunLine continues to work with the Committee on developing a better relationship with the community to address public transportation issues in the Valley. Staff continues to participate in the regional transportation planning process through participation on RCTC committees. These committees include the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service transportation Advisory Council, the Technical Advisory Committee, Long Term Services and Supports (LLTS) Coalition, and other planning related committees that will enhance coordination efforts undertaken by SunLine. SunLine will initiate a vanpool program using operating funds from the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant program in FY 2015/16 to be operated by a qualified outside vendor selected under an open bidding process. This operator will be responsible for vehicle acquisition (either via lease or purchase) and maintenance, program coordination, driver screening, and marketing. The vehicle fleet will consist of approximately 50 to 70 vehicles funded by the grant. Public Participation SunLine actively seeks public input for service changes, fare changes and related agency business. Public notices are published in the local newspapers, social media sites, as well as placed in the buses, bus shelters, and posted on SunLine's website to make information more accessible to the community. Public comments are accepted at each Board meeting. Customer comments are accepted Monday through Friday by the Customer Service Department, and on weekends by leaving a message on the automated voice recording system or with a Dispatcher in the Operations Department. Comments are entered into a database and used to help analyze and respond to trends. SunLine gets additional input from the ACCESS Advisory Committee, through community outreach activities, and by being active in government and civic affairs. SunLine staff is working to improve the locally defined process for soliciting and considering public input for approval by the Board of Directors. 23 1.4 Current Fare Structure SunLine's current fare structure consists of four fare categories: adult, youth, Senior (60+)/Disabled, and persons with qualifying disabilities who use SunDial. SunLine fixed route passengers pay the adult fare unless eligible for discounted fares, which are available only to seniors, the disabled and youth. There are two fare payment options: cash and passes. Children 4 years and under ride free with an adult fare. There are no plans for a fare increase in FY 2015/16; however, SunLine staff will examine the potential for future modifications to the fare structure in response to customer feedback indicating a desire to see additional transit service in the Coachella Valley. Figures 2 and 3 shown below detail the current fare structure. FIGURE 2: SunBus Fare Structure TYPE OF FARE FARE CATEGORY FIXED ROUTE FARES ADULT (18 YRS — 59 YRS) YOUTH (5 YRS —17 YRS) SENIOR 60+/ DISABLED/MEDICAID Cash/Base Fare $1.00 $.85 $.50 Transfers $.25 $.25 $.25 Day Pass $3.00 $2.00 $1.50 31-Day Pass $34.00 $24.00 $17.00 10-Ride Pass $10.00 $8.50 $5.00 Coachella Valley Employer Pass $24.00 -- -- Commuter Express Single Ride $6.00 -- $4.00 Commuter Express Day Pass $14.00 -- $10.00 Commuter Express 30-Day Pass $150.00 -- $100.00 Commuter Express fares are for trips between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County on the Riverside Commuter Link 220 Service. FIGURE 3: SunDial Fare Structure TYPE OF FARE (Only for ADA Certified Clients) SINGLE RIDE MULTIPLE RIDES (10-RIDE) Cash Fare - Same City $1.50 -- Cash Fare - City to City $2.00 -- 10-Ride Pass - Same City -- $15.00 10-Ride Pass - City to City -- $20.00 24 1.5 Revenue Fleet SunLine currently has 71 fixed route buses and 31 ADA paratransit vans. Additionally, there are 48 support vehicles including standard passenger cars and trucks as well as facility -specific golf carts and forklifts used for various activities in support of transit services provided in the Coachella Valley. Funding has been made available for bus rehabilitation, with new vehicle purchases as part of a fleet renewal program are planned to commence in FY 2017/18. SunLine was recently awarded $9.8 million through the Section 5312 Low or No Emission Vehicle Deployment Program in February 2015 to purchase and deploy five new zero -emission hydrogen fuel cell fixed route buses. These new vehicles are also anticipated to enter the SunLine fleet in FY 2017/18. 25 1.6 Existing/Planned Facilities SunLine's main office is located in Thousand Palms and houses the General Administration, Operations, Maintenance, Human Resources, Finance, Marketing, Customer Service, and Planning Departments. SunLine recently completed construction of a permanent new 25,000 square foot administration building on its Thousand Palms site which replaces the temporary structures that had housed SunLine administration since 1985. A groundbreaking ceremony was held on January 28, 2015. SunLine has also opened a new transit hub and Park and Ride facility at its Thousand Palms site for use by commuters traveling from the Coachella Valley to Western Riverside County on the Commuter Link 220 service as well as the proposed Line 20. Final construction on the administration building and transit hub is anticipated to continue into early FY 2015/16. Installation of new solar panels at the Thousand Palms yard commenced in FY 2014/15, and is anticipated to be completed in FY 2015/16. Work is expected to begin in FY 2015/16 on the construction of a new CNG fueling station in Thousand Palms. Future unfunded phases of the Thousand Palms facility project would see new Operations and Maintenance facilities built. During 2015/16, SunLine will issue a Request For Proposals to study options to rehabilitate or replace the agency's Indio satellite operating and maintenance facility, which is utilized for fixed route vehicles. The key transfer point for passengers transferring among routes in Indio is located just outside of this facility. Funding has also been identified for refurbishment of SunLine's hydrogen fueling station in Thousand Palms as well as construction of solar parking canopies at SunLine's administration building. These projects are anticipated to take place in FY 2015/16. 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies In addition to providing transit service throughout the Coachella Valley, SunLine offers transit connections to a number of adjacent transit operators. SunLine and RTA cooperate with the operation of Commuter Link 220 which connects Palm Desert and Thousand Palms with Cabazon, Beaumont, Moreno Valley, and Riverside via Interstate 10 and State Route 60. In addition to providing connections to RTA routes, Commuter Link 220 offers connections to Pass Transit services in Beaumont, OmniTrans Route 215 from the RTA Downtown Terminal, as well as Metrolink's Riverside and Inland Empire -Orange County Lines. The City of Palm Springs launched a free downtown shuttle operating as the Palm Springs Buzz in January 2015. The shuttle operates as a loop with 15 minute frequency from 11 am to 1 am on Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays. The City of Palm Springs and SunLine negotiated a formal agreement to allow the shuttle to use SunLine bus stops along the shuttle's route which is anticipated to be in force by FY 2015/16. SunLine also hosts Morongo Basin Transit Authority Routes 12 and 15 through a cooperative service agreement at its stops in downtown Palm Springs, offering connections to Yucca Valley, Joshua Tree, and Twentynine Palms. Likewise, the Amtrak California intercity bus system uses SunLine's bus stops in Palm Springs, Palm Desert, La Quinta, and Indio under another cooperative service agreement. Amtrak's Sunset Limited and Texas Eagle rail lines serve the Palm Springs Station on North Indian Canyon Drive; however, with rail service only serving Palm Springs three times a week in each direction, it is impractical for SunLine to offer transit service to this station. 26 1.8 Taxi Administration The SunLine Regulatory Administration (SRA), which is charged with licensing and regulating taxicab franchises and drivers in the Coachella Valley, also ensures residents and visitors are charged a fair and reasonable price. In addition, SRA is responsible for establishing and enforcing ethical standards maintained by the Franchising Board. Fleet Franchises Desert City Cab Yellow Cab of the Desert American Cab 27 CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service - Route by Route Evaluation and Analysis Since the last Comprehensive Operational Analysis Update, SunLine has made various small improvements to all fixed routes, including realigning existing routes and improving frequency to increase ridership. A review of the FY 2013/14 data indicates a continued increase over the same period for FY 2012/13. Service Efficiency and Effectiveness To determine the efficiency and effectiveness of all routes, staff reviewed the performance statistics for FY 2013/14 with data from the transit monitoring software TransTrack below that shows the most and least efficient routes. Factors used include passenger boardings, passengers per revenue hour, cost per passenger, passenger revenue per hour, and the farebox recovery ratio. FIGURE 4: Analysis of FY 2013/14 Performance Statistics LINES PASSENGER COUNT PASSENGERS PER REVENUE HOUR COST PER PASSENGER PASSENGER REVENUE PER HOUR FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 14 606,958 23.2 $4.45 $22.88 22.2% 15 112,642 20.6 $5.01 $20.37 19.8% 24 202,336 19.6 $5.24 $19.40 18.9% 30 755,195 30.4 $3.39 $30.00 29.1% 32 297,730 17.9 $5.76 $17.68 17.2% 53 59,258 9.4 $10.95 $9.29 9.0% 54 35,531 10.7 $9.83 $10.53 10.0% 70 254,866 25.7 $4.00 $25.56 24.8% 80 136,061 25.3 $4.07 $24.83 24.1 % 81 103,470 19.3 $5.34 $18.98 18.4% 90 228,958 19.3 $5.34 $19.04 18.5% 91 231,935 15.5 $6.66 $15.23 14.8% 95 26,603 8.5 $11.93 $8.59 8.5% 111 1,618,477 26.9 $3.83 $26.45 25.7% 220 14,258 6.1 $16.84 $6.01 5.8% SunDial 139,042 2.1 $31.42 $6.66 10.0% 28 FIGURE 5: Comparison of Fixed -Route Ridership, FY 2009/10 to FY 2013/14 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 SunLine Fixed -Route Ridership FY 2009/10 - FY 2013/14 ill 11 11111111 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 i FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 2.2 Paratransit Service — System Performance SunDial's paratransit services continue to be well utilized for client's day to day activities, such as medical appointments, shopping, or work. A total of 139,042 trips were made on SunDial in FY 2013/14 compared to 136,208 trips in FY 2012/13 with a 2.1 percent increase in FY 2013/14. Overall, ridership for the demand response and subscription continues to grow. FIGURE 6: Comparison of SunDial Ridership, FY 2012/13 & FY 2013/14 SERVICE TYPE FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 PERCENT CHANGE SunDial 136,208 139,042 2.1% FIGURE 7: Comparison of SunDial Ridership, FY 2009/10 to FY 2013/14 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 SunDial Ridership FY 2009/10 - FY 2013/14 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 29 Specialized Transit Service SunLine has Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom funds from the 2013 Universal Call for Projects to continue operation of the Commuter Link 220 service through September 2016. In addition, SunLine will continue to use a previous award of New Freedom funds to operate a Taxi Voucher Program for seniors and persons with disabilities. Allocations of funding allows for volunteer driver mileage reimbursement and other transportation programs for seniors and the disabled within the Coachella Valley by Independent Living Partnership. 2.3 Key Performance Indicators To ensure adherence to the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) established by RCTC, SunLine continues to monitor and evaluate routes to guarantee compliance with key performance indicators. The performance indicators are monitored through TransTrack software implemented by RCTC for all Riverside County transit operators. Over the last six years, SunLine has consistently met PIP compliance requirements for both mandatory and discretionary performance indicators. 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts Staff continues to work in coordination and cooperation with local jurisdictions on service related issues that affect transit services provided in the Coachella Valley. Staff will continue monitoring existing routes using service warrants to further evaluate route performance. In addition to concentrating on modifying and adjusting existing routes, further analysis will be undertaken to review unproductive routes to determine if particular segments or trips should be modified or discontinued due to low productivity. 2.5 Service Standards and Warrants The factors listed below are considered when analyzing new service proposals and requests, as well as evaluating existing service. Area Coverage: While most of the urbanized sections of SunLine's service area are adequately served, there are some areas which are provided with more service than others. When service is proposed, the new line will be evaluated based on its proximity to other lines, and the necessity of its implementation based on area coverage and service productivity standards. Areas that are not currently served or are underserved but warrant new or enhanced service will be evaluated to receive new transit service when budget becomes available or through efficiency improvements of the existing transit lines. Growth in the ADA paratransit service area must also be addressed as part of any new service planning. Funding of these types of services must be prioritized along with improvements to existing transit services, based on available funding. Market Area Characteristics: Staff also considers the density and demographic characteristics of a given service area as an important determinant for providing transit success. In tying area coverage standards to population and employment densities, SunLine recognizes the need to provide more service within more highly developed areas, and often considers this factor as part of the service development process. Transit -Dependent Populations: SunLine considers the effects of service changes on transit -dependent riders during service planning processes. While SunLine's current network serves most transit - dependent populations and their destinations effectively, the agency continues to examine transit dependency when evaluating new service proposals. Special Market Needs: Staff often receives requests for new service when existing routes do not adequately address unique market opportunities. Some examples include short routes such as shuttles may better connect two or more high demand destinations, such as a transit center and an employment center, a senior center and a shopping complex, or student housing and a university campus. They may 30 also provide local circulation between destinations in a single community with the service span and frequency tailored to these unique markets. Recommended Standards of Evaluating New Services: Once a route is implemented, performance monitoring begins immediately to determine if the route is reaching its desired potential and to meet performance standards. New service routes that do not meet minimum standards are subject to the same remedial actions as existing services and may be evaluated at the one and two year marks and may be truncated or consolidated if line productivity does not improve. The SunLine Board adopted a new set of service standards for transit service performance in July 2013. 2.6 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth over Next Two Years SunLine continues to evaluate, monitor, and adjust transit service to best meet the travel needs of the residents and visitors to the Coachella Valley. SunLine has implemented incremental service changes as funding has permitted, with major efforts in FY 2014/15 consisting of the expansion of Line 15 to Desert Edge, enhancements to Lines 80 and 81 in the City of Indio, and enhancements to Line 90 in the City of Coachella to improve connectivity to new shopping and grocery destinations. More improvements are planned in future years (see Chapter 3). The agency will continue tracking both existing service usage and new developments to ensure service is offered where the greatest need exists. Through SunLine's development review program, staff works in cooperation with local jurisdictions to determine where new developments are occurring to identify associated transit service needs and opportunities. As the Coachella Valley continues to grow, SunLine will assess areas in which additional transit could potentially be provided. SunLine will also continue working with school districts to improve access to public transit and continued coordination of school bell times for routing and scheduling purposes. 2.7 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs Passenger Amenities and Bus Stop Improvement Program As of January 2015, SunLine serves 619 bus stops, which are cleaned and maintained on a regular basis. Since completion of the 2006 Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) and 2009 COA Update, SunLine has made significant improvements to bus stops in the Coachella Valley. At present, 397 bus stops have shelters. In FY 2014/15, funding was received to allow 35 new shelters and 3 relocated inactive shelters to be placed at active locations. Funding is also being requested for 25 additional shelters to be installed in FY 2015/16. On -Board Passenger Amenities All SunLine buses have electronic designation signs. The signs show the route number, route name, and the destination of the bus. All the buses have display racks for public announcements notices and timetables. Passengers are able to request a stop without leaving their seats by ringing the bell that is controlled by a plastic strip located within their reach. Air conditioning and heating are provided on the buses for passenger comfort. 31 Bicycle Facilities All SunLine's fixed route buses have mounted exterior bike racks that give bicyclists an alternate mode for traveling in the Coachella Valley. Combining bicycling and riding the bus has increased the range of options for riders who utilize other modes of transportation for their mobility needs. SunLine is currently working with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) on their Non -Motorized Transportation Plan update and proposed bike racks and/or bike lockers at selected bus stop locations. Revenue Collection Equipment In 2010, SunLine installed electronic registering fareboxes on all fixed route buses. This has increased SunLine's ability to collect more accurate revenue, decreased staff's time in reconciling revenue collected, and improved the accuracy of ridership counts. It also enhanced passenger access to passes, allowing for their sale on board buses. In addition to new fareboxes, one ticket vending machine (TVM) continues to be in operation at the transfer location in Indio. SunLine plans to study future revenue collection systems in FY 2015/16, including the potential for additional TVM installations and future implementation of a stand-alone or shared contactless smart fare card similar to Los Angeles' Transit Access Pass. On -Board Security Cameras SunLine has interior and exterior video cameras installed on all fixed route buses to improve its ability to monitor and record activities inside and outside the buses that will enhance the safety and security of passengers. With these cameras, SunLine is able to investigate criminal and suspicious activities that may occur at bus stops and transfer locations as well as incidents and accidents involving the bus. Furthermore, to enhance the safety of passengers on ADA paratransit vans, Smart Drive technology has been installed. This system enables monitoring, tracking, and real-time data collection of activities occurring on these vans. This information can also be used to improve driver training and skills. In FY 2014/15, streaming live video links were added to vehicles in use on Commuter Link 220, with additional funding anticipated to complete implementation across the rest of the fixed route bus fleet arriving in FY 2015/16. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) All buses are equipped with Automatic Passenger Counters, Automatic Voice Annunciators, Automated Vehicle Locators, and Global Positioning Systems. Additionally, staff implemented scheduling software for fixed route planning. SunLine service information has been available in Google Transit for trip planning purposes. Wi-Fi is available on Commuter Link 220 buses, and is planned to be expanded to the full fixed route fleet in FY 2015/16. SunLine intends to install equipment on all buses to provide a live video feed. Bus Replacement Program SunLine continues to replace ADA paratransit vans when they exceed 150,000 miles (approximately every three years). Four replacement vans were ordered in FY 2014/15, with 13 replacement vans and one expansion van are planned to be purchased in FY 2015/16. The fixed route bus fleet will begin to be updated in 2017, when the 2005 Orion buses become eligible for federal funding for replacement (12- year lifespan). Two new hydrogen electric hybrid fuel cell buses were added to the fleet in FY 2014/15 and one is scheduled to be received from CALSTART under the FTA's Fuel Cell Bus Program in 2016. SunLine is also partnering with the California Energy Commission and Hygrogenics Inc. to demonstrate a new battery dominate fuel cell bus for one year. In addition, new federal funding has been received for five additional fuel cell bus purchases in FY 2015/16. All SunLine vehicles (including support vehicles) are powered with compressed natural gas with the exception of SunLine's hydrogen fuel cell bus fleet. 32 Facility Needs SunLine administration has recently moved into a new building constructed at SunLine's Thousand Palms site. Demolition will be required for the temporary structures that previously housed administrative staff. A Request For Proposals (RFP) for a study to determine a future plan for the agency's satellite operating and maintenance facility in Indio will be issued in FY 2015/16, with work expected to commence shortly thereafter. SunLine was awarded FTA Section 5309 State of Good Repair funds matched with SCAQMD funds to replace the solar panels at the Thousand Palms operating base. This project is anticipated to be completed in FY 2015/16. SunLine is working with the City of Coachella to develop a new multimodal transit center in central Coachella to support enhanced local transit services and improve transit efficiency and effectiveness in the East Valley, including the extension of Line 111. Work toward site selection and preliminary facility studies will continue in FY 2015/16. I 1: 111111L f111 'I illy.. 1'lp11111 I!]I! III. .. � 1 '1�1111 7111111 17 I Ills I III IIII! IS1111111 l 11II I111�I11 ' 1 Il►il�� I'111111111111 ill , ,1, , I 11e1�� 111111111II G �111 IIII IIII IIIIIIII . I '1 ' {II IL.a" IILI . Illl1!plll 1tli� lul 1;;I rl s; i ;l 111 I I I .141 . �Ui� II:.. Ir .11, SunLine's new Administration Building in Thousand Palms 33 CHAPTER 3 - PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes SunLine currently operates 14 local fixed route transit routes and one Commuter Link route. These routes serve the urbanized area of the Coachella Valley, consisting of SunLine's nine (9) member cities (Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage) as well as seven (7) unincorporated communities of Bermuda Dunes, North Shore, Mecca, Oasis, Thermal, Thousand Palms and Desert Edge. In FY 2013/14, SunLine served over 4.8 million passengers system -wide, including 4.7 million boardings recorded on fixed route buses and over 139,000 rides by ADA paratransit clients. FY 2014/15 ridership through March 2015 has averaged a 1.9 percent increase over the same period in FY 2013/14. Service improvements may be considered based on additional review of the performance of the FY 2014/15 service improvements and assessment of available funding and other budget priorities by the Board. 3.2 Recommended Short Term Service Improvements For FY 2015/16, the Agency would like to implement the service improvements listed below: • Line 20: Desert Hot Springs —Thousand Palms - Palm Desert o Introduce new service between the Cities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Desert and unincorporated community of Thousand Palms via Interstate 10 • Line 70: La Quinta —Indian Wells - Palm Desert — Bermuda Dunes o Increase weekday frequency from 45 minutes to 40 minutes o Increase weekend frequency to 60 minutes instead of 90 minutes o Extend the route north of 1-10 freeway to serve retail and commercial area and the Sun City Palm Desert retirement community of almost 10,000 residents • Line 91: Indio — Coachella — Thermal — Mecca — Oasis o Revise route to follow Line 90 alignment between Harrison Street in Coachella and Indio to be implemented when Line 111 is extended from Indio to Coachella o Improve weekend frequency to 60 minutes from 80 minutes • Line 95: Indio — Coachella — Mecca — North Shore o Add an early and late trip on weekdays within the existing resources as well as introduce weekend service • Line 111: Palm Springs —Cathedral City — Rancho Mirage — Palm Desert —Indian Wells — La Quinta - Indio o Extend service from Indio to Coachella via Indio Boulevard and Harrison Street • Commuter Link 220: Palm Desert — Thousand Palms — Cabazon — Beaumont — Moreno Valley - Riverside o Add two westbound and two eastbound weekday trips o Add weekend service 34 Future service improvement plans listed below call for modifications to five routes to increase coverage of communities within the service area in addition to increased service frequencies on a number of highly productive routes. Maps for proposed route realignments are included in Chapter One under each respective line. Implementation of these changes are subject to new funding availability (CMAQ grants, etc.), Board approval, and public outreach. • Line 24: Palm Springs o Extend route to Ramon Road/San Luis Rey retail area and replace terminus loop route at South Palm Springs (Palm Springs International Airport, etc.) • Line 30: Palm Springs — Cathedral City o Extend route to El Cielo/Tahquitz Canyon Way to provide more frequent service to the Palm Springs International Airport • Line 32: Palm Springs - Cathedral City — Rancho Mirage - Thousand Palms - Palm Desert o Increase weekday daytime service frequency from 50 to 40 minutes o Provides the opportunity to extend Line 24 (see above) • Lines 80/81: Indio o Increase frequency from 60 to 30 minutes weekdays o Extend route to Jefferson Street and Avenue 39 at Shadow Hills High School 3.3 Longer Term Service Modifications and Adjustments In light of ongoing challenges with operating funds, staff plans to continue evaluating existing services and developing improvements for funding and approval by the Board of Directors, as set out in Section 3.2. SunLine will also continue to use the PIP measurements and its own set of Service Standards as guidelines to improve service efficiency and effectiveness. An RFP will be issued to examine Bus Rapid Transit and other enhanced transit service opportunities in the Coachella Valley in FY 2015/16. SunLine has also engaged a planning consultant to help develop a vision for the future structure of the transit network to further increase its share of trips made in the Coachella Valley, the findings of which will be reflected in future transit plans. In particular, SunLine plans to research further means of improving service to areas currently served, such as opportunities to improve service frequency and reduce travel time, while also researching how to best deliver effective transit service to areas without service at present. These improvements are likely to require significant additional new operating funding and an expanded fleet. Specific areas where service will be explored in the future include: • Circulator service within the City of Coachella • A flex route or "dial -a -ride" zone serving the unincorporated community of Oasis • Service on Indian Canyon North of 1-10 freeway in the City of Palm Springs In the future, SunLine plans to provide 15, 30, or 60 minute service frequency throughout its network on weekdays. This will need careful planning of funding levels and new fleet to sustain both operating costs and the purchase of new fleet/replacement of existing fleet. 35 3.4 Marketing and Promotion SunLine plans to continue the promotion and marketing of existing service, service improvements, and new routes in FY 2015/16. The marketing plan entails conducting more public outreach to businesses and schools along the routes, as well as advertise service in bus shelters, on buses, social media and on SunLine's website promoting the Google Transit and Bus Tracker software applications. 3.5 Budget Impacts on Proposed Changes SunLine in the longer term plans to introduce service improvements to existing routes as outlined in 3.3. Select service improvements have been identified for funding and are listed in the Chapter 1 service descriptions, while other service improvements have not had funding identified and may be implemented with new funding opportunities. 36 CHAPTER 4 - FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget In FY 2015/16, SunLine plans to have an operating budget of $30,794,949 and a capital project budget of $25,502,013. The operating budget will absorb cost increases in wages and benefits, some new operating and administrative staff positions, as well as costs associated with operating expanded service. SunLine utilizes funding from various sources to operate its fixed route and paratransit services. Revenues include SunLine's bus and shelter advertising, a contribution from Riverside Transit Agency towards the operating costs for the Riverside Commuter Link service, outside fuel sales revenue, taxi voucher sales, interest, and funding from two jurisdictions for bus shelter maintenance. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program For FY 2015/16, funding plans for the proposed operating and capital programs are as follows: Funding sources for the proposed operating budget includes ETA Section 5307 (Urban), 5311 (Rural), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), and Low Carbon Operating Program (LCTOP) funds apportioned by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), State Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Local Measure A funding, Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA), and other revenue for operating assistance, as well as remaining previously awarded Section 5316 (JARC) and 5317 (New Freedom) funds. Funding sources for capital projects include funds from FTA Section 5307, 5310, and 5339, as well as State Proposition 1B: PTMISEA and Transit Safety and Security, State Transit Assistance (STA), California Cap & Trade, California Energy Commission (CEC), CMAQ, and California Air Resources Board (CARB). 37 4.2.A Operating Budget The estimated operating budget of $30,794,949, outlined in Table 4, is funded from: • Estimated new Local Transportation funds (LTF) totaling $15,029,833 • Estimated Measure A funds totaling $6,492,099 • Estimated Section 5307 funds for operating assistance of $3,200,000 • Estimated Section 5310 funds for operating assistance of $28,000 • Estimated Section 5311 funding of $359,891 • Carryover Section 5316 JARC $63,742 (Commuter Link 220) • Carryover Section 5317 New Freedom funds $27,840 (Commuter Link, Taxi Vouchers) • Estimated CMAQ funding $196,585 (Line 20) • Anticipated Low -Carbon Transit Operations grant funding of $155,907 (Line 91) • Other revenues in the amount of $1,703,450 from: o $999,878 from outside fuel sales o $150,000 in advertising revenues o $119,000 in bus shelter maintenance contract funding o $66,621 for Riverside Transit Agency funding of Commuter Link 220 service o $175,000 in emissions credits o $60,729 SRA overhead fees o $89,148 in Taxi Voucher sales o $43,074 of interest and other income • Estimated passenger fare revenue in the amount of $3,537,602 38 4.2.8 Capital Improvement Program Budget The estimated FY 2015-16 capital improvement program is a budget of $25,502,013, including: • Estimated new State Transit Assistance (STA) funds in the amount of $867,964 • Carryover STA funds in the amount of $2,086,196 • Estimated new PTMISEA program funds in the amount of $4,931,311 • Estimated Proposition 1B Transit Security funds in the amount of $373,153 • Estimated new Section 5307 capital assistance funds in the amount of $3,458,489 • Estimated new Section 5310 capital assistance funds in the amount of $93,406 • Carryover Section 5339 capital assistance funds in the amount of $913,804 • Estimated new Low or No Emission Vehicle Deployment Program (LoNo) funds in the amount of $9,803,860 • CMAQ funds in the amount of $973,830 • Anticipated CARB funds in the amount of $2,000,000 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Americans with Disability Act (ADA) SunLine complies with ADA Regulations with accessible vehicles used for fixed route transit services and ADA paratransit service vans. Supervisor vans are also equipped with wheelchair lifts. The agency continues to work with local jurisdictions to continue to increase the number of accessible bus stops in full compliance with ADA guidelines. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) SunLine's DBE semiannual reports are kept current, with the most recent DBE report submitted in December 2014. The next DBE report will be submitted in June 2015. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) SunLine complies with federal regulations pertaining to employment and submits its EEO-1 report every year to the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) as well as its EEO/Affirmative Action Program every three years to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The most recent EEO-1 report was submitted to the EEOC and certified in September of 2014. The most recent EEO/Affirmative Action Program was revised and submitted to the FTA in FY 2013/14 and has been accepted. Title VI SunLine's Title VI Report was updated in FY 2013/14 for use in the FY 2014/15 to FY 2016/17 period, and was submitted to and approved by the FTA by the required deadline of November 30, 2013. Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Audit In FY 2012/13, RCTC commissioned Pacific Management Consulting to conduct the Triennial Performance Audit as required by TDA. The audit of SunLine was conducted in 2013 with no findings. Federal Transit Administration Triennial Audit Staff completed the FTA FY 2013 Triennial Audit in January 2014. There was one finding regarding notification to FTA of the disposal of surplus vehicles that has been addressed and approved by FTA. 39 National Transit Database (NTD) Report and Sampling Staff has completed NTD Section sampling for FY 2013/14. SunLine is running parallel sampling using manual samples and Automatic Passenger Counter (APC) data in order to gain approval to use APC data in future reporting. Staff plans on completing validation of the APC data by the close of FY 2014/15. Alternative Fuel Vehicles SunLine conforms to RCTC's Alternative Fuel Policy with all vehicles in the fleet using CNG or hydrogen fuel. The current active fleet consists of 56 40-foot CNG buses, 5 40-foot Hydrogen Fuel Cell buses, 10 32-foot CNG buses, 31 22-foot paratransit buses, and 47 total non -revenue CNG or electric vehicles, including both general support cars and trucks as well as facility -specific golf carts and forklifts. ill* 1110 - 111 ir,1111 11. Till Ili I iilliin11111111111111 I 1 11 ,,,lit r �...- r �� p CNG Fuel Pump ir f Hydrogen Fuel Pump 40 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 1 FLEET INVENTORY ram` Lacey Fempar a;a, :an.,:eipl Bus (Motorbus) / Directly Operated Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Suable Transit Agency Year Built Mfg. Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Miles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2012 EDN 2014 EDN 2009 EDN 2008 NFA 2008 NFA 2008 NFA 2005 OBI 2004 VAN AXCESS AXCESS E2Ricler32' LF 40' LF 40' LF 40' ORION V40' A-330 40' 37 37 29 39 39 39 44 30 1 2 10 1 20 21 15 1 40 40 32 40 40 40 40 40 OR OR CN OR CN CN CN DR 1 2 10 1 20 21 15 1 0 fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,729 1,630,893 80,788 6,022,043 6,235,159 4,800,844 138,293 93,601 32,869 1,919,880 86,625 6,921,183 7,143,835 5,290,807 138,293 93,601 16,435 191,988 86,625 346,059 340,183 352,720 138,293 Totals: 294 71 42 71 0 18,988,749 21,627,093 304,607 Ir MEM liwrpds Cwwtr l:ovitstim iamrisse Demand Response f Directly Operated Table 1 - Fleet Inventory TY2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan SunLine Transit Agency Year Mfg. Built Code Model Code Seating Capacity Lift and Ramp Vehicle Equipped Length Fuel Type Code # of Active Vehicles FY 2014/15 # of Contingency Vehicles FY 2014/15 Life to Date Vehicle Miles Prior Year End FY 2013/14 Life to Date Vehicle Miles through March FY 2014/15 Average Lifetime Mlles Per Active Vehicle As Of Year -To -Date (e.g., March) FY 2014/15 2010 2012 2013 EDN EDN EDN AEROTECH AEROTECH AEROTECH 12 12 12 4 13 14 22 22 22 CN CN CN 4 13 14 0 0 0 491,333 1,281,555 552,215 589,513 1,720,028 1,059,685 147,378 132,310 75,692 Totals: 36 31 31 0 2,325,103 3,369,226 108,685 43 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 2 SERVICE SUMMARY IMME OM= .dl iamom Table 2 -- SunLine Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/13 Audited FY 2.?13:14 Audited FY 201.1r15 Plan FY 2014a5 3rd Qtr actual FY 2015r'16 Flan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet : _ Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $22,757,833 $25,623,354 $28,009,634 $19,570,129 y30,799,949 Total Passenger Far Revenue $4,793;643 $5,052,151 $4,986,958 $4,576,369 $5,607,118 Net Operating Expenses {Subsidies) $17,969,190 $20 571,203 $23•022,676 $11,893,755 525;187,831 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 4,707,796 4,823,320 5,217,902 3,654,869 5,143,610 Passenger Miles 31,496,565 32,259,923 34,861,321 26,807,536 37,677,722 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours {a) 253,232.9 271,419,E 285,986.0 214,491.3 295,655.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 3,538,009.4 3,902,105,2 4;207,657.0 3,131,217.7 4,367,433.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 3r1365M3.6 4,329,457.9 4;690,034,0 3,474,345.0 4,865,023.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $89.87 $94.41 $97.94 $91,21 $101.16 Farehoa Recovery Ratio 21.06% 19.72% 17.80% 23.90% 18.20% Subsidy per Pa eager $3.82 $4.26 $4.41 $1.08 $1.90 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0,57 $0.64 $0.66 $0.56 $0.67 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $70.94 $75.79 $80.50 $69,44 $85.19 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (h) $5.08 $5.27 $5.47 $9.76 $5.77 Pa anger per Revenue Hour {a) 18.6 17.8 10.2 17.0 17.4 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1,33 1.24 1.24 1.17 1.18 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Mlles for Rail Modes. 45 linrilk',runImgvision ammeai Table 2 -- SunLine Transit Agency -- SRTPServiice Summary FY 2015 f 16 Short Range Transit Plan Nan -Excluded Routes FY t912,:13 Aildited FY 2013/14 Audited FY 2014f15 Plan FY 2014f15 3rd QtrAcltual FY 2015j16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet -. .. Financial Data Total Operating Fxperses S21,480,662 $24,716,501 $26,083,667 $18,605,126 $28,928,025 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $4,621,920 $4,976,924 S.4,660,069 $9,545,937 $5,293,116 Net Operating Expenses {Subsidies} $16,858,743 $19,740,077 -521,423,798 $19,059,189 $23,631,909 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Taps 4,528,243 9,746,928 5,085,615 3,549,325 4,979,120 Passenger Miles 30,317,953 31,754,972 33,994,841 26,079,282 36,493,392 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours [a) 219,078.8 262,649.8 273,189.0 294,735.0 282,729.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 3,316,755.4 3,704,380.9 3,9334389.0 Z932,779.6 9,127,151.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 3,696,858.6 4,111,239.3 4,393,571.0 3,258,994.3 9,596,969.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cast per Revenue Hour $89.47 $94.10 $95,48 $90.87 $192.32 Farebax Recovery Ratio 21.52% 20.139{ 17.86% 24.43°l 18.29°I Subsidy per Passenger $3.72 $4.16 $4,21 $3.96 $1.75 Subsidy per Pa_.enger Mile $9.56 $0.62 $0.63 $9.59 $0.65 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $70.22 $75.16 578.42 $68.67 $83.60 Subsidy perRevenue Mile (b) $5.04 $5.33 $5,45 $4.79 $5.73 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 18.9 18.1 18.6 17.3 17.6 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.35 1.28 1.29 1.21 1.21 {a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Bail Modes. 46 1.1.11 il=ffif- !NMI [eMr uR'1!'IYi71 ieesicin, Table 2 -- SunLine Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY /015/16 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2012 r 13 Ali CI liked FY 2013r 14 Audited FY 2014115 Plan FY 2014115 31-11 Qtr Adrial FY 2015/16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet . : Financial Data Total Dperating Expenses $1,2.77,171 $906,853 41,925,757 $964,998 $1,866,921 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $171,724 $75,726 $326,839 $130,432 $314,002 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,105,447 $831,127 $1,598,878 034,566 $1,552,922 Gperating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 173,553 76,392 132,237 105,_ i= 1E4,490 Passenger Miles 1,178,612 504,951 866,430 728,25 1,134o330 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Hours (a) 13,154.1 8,764.9 12,802.0 9r756.4 12,926.0 Total Actual Vehide Revenue Miles (b) 191,254.0 197,724.3 273,768.0 193,438.1 240,282.0 Total Actual Vehide Miles 218,160.0 218,213.6 296,463.0 215,350.7 268, 554.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $97.09 $103.46 $150,43 $98.91 $141.43 Farebax Recovery patio 13.45% 3,35% 15.97% 13.52% 16.81°1 Subsidy per Paenger $6.16 $10.88 $12.09 $7.91 $9.44 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.94 $1.65 $1.85 $1.15 $1.31 Subsidy pier Revenue dour (a) $81.01 $94.83 $124.89 $85.51 4120.11 Subsidy eel Revenue Me (b) $5.78 $4.20 $5.84 $4.21 $6.46 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 13.7 3.7 10.3 10.8 12.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0,94 0.39 0.48 0.53 0.68 (a) Train H0493 Fa' Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Mode:. 47 ,M=0 rn, a ccmhi b lion tarmila , Table 2 -- SunLine-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012/ 13 Audited FY 2013 f 14 Audited Fr 2U 14 f 15 Plan FY 2014 / 15 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015 / 16 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet .: Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $18,613,341 $21,255,056 $22,975,44: $16,059,722 $25,547,893 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $4,342,950 $4r617r536 $4,196,451 $4,243,018 $4,708,713 Net Operating Expenses {Subsidies} $14,270,391 06,637,550 $13,779,397 $11,3/6,741 $20,839,180 Ciperating Characteristic; Unlinked Passenger Trips 4,571,588 4r684r2713 5,073,888 3,539,424 4,986,605 Passenger Miles 29,961,418 30,693,464 33,233,965 25,505,251 35,903,563 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue How's (a) 191,953.5 206,142.6 219,473.0 152,295.2 226,860.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 2,585,804.1 2,869,355.2 3,142,639.0 2,310,676.7 3,273,379.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 2r837r079.6 3,201,438.0 3,536r967.0 2,581,814A 3575r022.9 Perfonma1ace Characterl5ti15 Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $96.97 $103.11 $101.68 $98.95 $113.01 Fanebox Recovery Italia 23.33% 21,72% 18.26% 26.42% 18.43% Subsidy per Passenger $3.12 $3.55 $3.70 $3.34 $4.16 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.48 $0.54 $0.57 $0.46 $0.58 Subsidy per Revenue liour (a) $74.35 $80.71 $35,57 $72.81 $92.18 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $5.52 $5.80 $5.98 $5.11 $6.37 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 23.8 22.7 23.1 21.8 22.1 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) L77 1.63 1,61 1.53 1.52 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Cai Miles foi Rail Modes. 48 1.1.�� rnanth Cory bmprrrm{mmieia Table 2 -- SunLine-DAR -- SR TP Service Summary Pt' 2015/16 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2012113 Audited FY .201 3:14 Audited FY 2014j 15 Plan FY 2014415 3rd Qtr Actual FY 2015,116 Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak-hlour Fleet _- 29 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $4,143,992 $4,368,263 55,034,1B6 $3,510,402 $5,247,056 Total Passenger Faye Revenue $450,691 $434,614 $790,907 $433,352 $898,405 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $3,693,299 $3,933,6,53 54,243,279 $3,077,051 $4,348,651 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Tiips 136,208 139,012 144,014 115,445 157,005 Passenger Miles 1,535,148 1,566,459 1,621,356 1,302,285 1,774,159 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 61,279.4 65,272.0 66,513.0 52,196.1 69,595.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 952,205.3 1,032,750.0 1,065,018,0 820,541.0 1,094,654.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 1,027,939.0 1,122,019,9 1,153,067.0 892,500.6 1,190,001.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cast per Revenue Hour $67.62 $66.92 $75,69 $67.25 $75.39 Farebooc Recovery Ratio 10.88% 9,95% 15.71% 12.34% 17.12% Subsidy per Passenger $27.12 $28.29 $29,46 $26.65 $27.70 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.41 $2.51 $2,61 $2.36 $2.45 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $60.27 00.27 $63,80 $58,95 $62.49 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.88 $3.81 $3,98 $3.75 $3.97 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 2.2 2.1 2,2 2.2 2.3 Pa eager per Revenue Mile (b) 0.14 0.13 0,14 0.11 0.14 (a) Train Hours For Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes, 49 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 3 ROUTE STATISTICS �� CD ��reow6, rmspaqiim r,Tmecm Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics SunLine Transit Agency -- 8 FY 2015/16 All Routes Route # Day Type Peak Vehicles Passengers Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy SUN-111 Unassigned 15 1,633,268 11,759,529 62,341.0 66,726.0 886,718.0 1,069,571.0 $7,018,305 $1,392429g $5,626,006 SUN-14 Unassigned 7 693,352 4,992,133 29,394.0 31,12_9.0 437,562.0 497,953.0 $3,455,471 $565,244 $2,890,226 SUN-15 Unassigned 1 126,873 870,322 5,455.0 5,785.0 79,161.0 89,208.0 $620,151 $116,203 $503,917 SUN-20 Unassigned 2 26,927 193,874 1,556.0 1,913.0 33,591.0 49,317.0 $342,341 $58,262 $284,578 SUN-220 Unassigned 2 16 229 116,848 3,073.0 3,674.0 95,314.13 106,08.3.0 $737,462 $110,749 $626,713 51181-24 Unassg ned 4 192,526 1,386,185 9,612.0 11,063.0 131,709.0 163,637.0 $1,137,914 $7226,716 $911,198 SUN-30 Unassigned 8 824,100 5,933,522 27,7543.0 29,414.0 261,854.0 298,419.0 $2,074,510 $414,903 $1,659,632 SUN-32 Unassigned 3 305,516 2,199,932 16,795.0 17,829.0 279,027.0 301,203.0 $2,093,393 $403,279 $1,690,613 SUN-53 UnassOrd 2 59,228 426,442 6,887.0 7,273.0 39,213.0 98,297.0 $662,710 $134,173 $548,537 SUN-54 Unassg red 2 98,164 706,784 6,765.0 6,796.0 114,134.0 114,439.0 $795,555 $158,302 $637,253 SUN-70 Unassigned 5 249,886 1,799,182 13,410.0 14,669.0 169,609.0 199,474.0 $1,386,698 $277,177 $1,109,521 SUN-80 Unassig red 1 138,240 995,326 5,3513.0 5,147.0 59,539.0 62,895.0 5437,235 $87,447 $349,788 SUN-81 Unassigned 1 93,255 671,435 5,360.0 5,462.0 49,710.0 53,22_3.0 $369,992 $73,993 $295,993 SUN-9D Unassg red 2 230,637 1,660,586 11,844.0 12,058.0 153,026.0 169,667.0 $1,116,926 $223,384 $893,536 SUN91 Unassigned 3 264,970 1,907,786 15,855.0 16,637.0 340,625.0 366,767.0 $2,549,680 $7369,133 $2,180,546 SUN-95 Unassigned 1 39,399 283,672 4,6435.0 5,067.0 87,557.0 101,798.0 $728,528 $97,438 $631,099 SUN-DAR Unassigned 29 157,005 1,774,159 69,595.0 73,891.0 1,094,054.0 1,199,001.0 $5,247,056 $698,405 $4,348,651 Service Provider Totals 88 5,143,610 37,677,722 295,655.0 314,835.0 4,367,433.0 4,865,023.0 $36,794,949 $5,607,118 $25,137,831 51 1.1.1� u..risii rcrt vim Corminsea Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics SunLine Transit Agency -- 8 FY 2015/16 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mae Per Hour Per Mile SUN-111 Unassigned $112.58 $7.91 $4.30 19.83% $3.44 $0.48 590.25 $6.34 26.2 1.84 SUN-14 Unassigned $117.56 $7.90 $4.98 16.35% $4.17 $0.58 $98.33 $6.61 23.6 1.58 SUN-15 Unassigned $113.68 $7.83 $5.13 18.73% $4.17 $0.58 $92.38 $6.37 22.2 1.53 SUN-20 Unassigned $226.33 $8.88 $12.73 16.99% $10.57 $1.47 1182.89 $7.37 17.3 0.70 AN-220 Unassigned $239.98 $7.73 $45.94 15.01. $38.62 $5.36 $203.91 $6.57 5.3 0.17 SIRit-24 Unassigned $118.38 $8.64 $5.91 19.92% $4.73 $0.66 $94.80 $6.92 20.0 1.46 SUN-30 Unassigned $71.74 $7.92 $252 20.00% $2.01 $0.28 $59.79 $6.34 29.7 3.15 SUN-32 Unassigned $121.67 $7.50 $6.85 19.25% $5.53 $0.77 $100.66 $6.06 18.2 1.10 SUNF53 Unassgried $99.13 $7.65 $11.53 19.65% $9.26 $1.29 $79.65 $6.15 8.6 0.56 SUN-54 Unassigned $117.60 $6.97 $8.10 19.89% $6.49 $0.90 $94.20 $5.58 14.5 0.86 SUN-70 Unassigned $103.41 $8.18 $5.55 19.98% $4.44 $0.62 $82.74 $6.54 18.6 1.47 SUN-80 Unassigned $81.73 $7.34 $3.16 20.00% $2.53 $0.35 $65.38 5537 25.8 2.32 SUN-81 Unassigned $69.03 $7.14 53.97 20.06% $3.17 $0.44 $55.22 $5.95 17.4 1.88 SUN-90 Unassigned $94.30 $7.30 $4.84 20.66% $3.87 $0.54 $75.44 $5.84 19.5 1.51 SUN-91 Unassigned $160.81 $7,49 $9.62 14.47% $6.23 $1.14 $137.53 56.40 16.7 0.78 SUN 95 Unassigned $158.20 $8.32 $18.49 13.37% $16.02 $2.22 5137.04 $7.21 8.6 0.45 SUN-DAR Unassigned $75.39 $1.80 $33.42 17.12% $27.70 $2.45 $62.19 $3.97 2.3 0.14 Service Provider Totals $164.16 $7.05 $5.99 18.20% $4.90 $6.67 $85.19 $5.77 17.4 1.18 52 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 3A INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS 53 TABLE 3A - Individual Route Descriptions Line # Route Class Route Description/Cities Served Line 14 Regional Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs Line 15 Local Desert Hot Springs and the community of Desert Edge Line 20 Market- Based Desert Hot Springs, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and the community of Thousand Palms Line 24 Local Palm Springs Line 30 Regional Palm Springs and Cathedral City Line 32 Local Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and the community of Thousand Palms Line 53 Local Palm Desert Line 54 Local Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Indio, and the community of Bermuda Dunes Line 70 Local La Quinta, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and the community of Bermuda Dunes Lines 80/81 Local Indio Line 90 Local Indio and Coachella Line 91 Local Indio, Coachella, and the communities of Thermal, Mecca, and Oasis Line 95 Rural Indio, Coachella, and the communities of Mecca and North Shore Line 111 Regional Coachella, Indio, La Quinta, Indian Wells, Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, and Palm Springs Line 220 Market- Based Palm Desert, Thousand Palms, Cabazon (Morongo Casino), Beaumont, Moreno Valley, and Riverside 54 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 36 NEW/EXISTING ROUTES EXEMPTION 55 TABLE 3B - FY 2015/16 New/Existing Routes Exemption Sheet ROUTE # MODE SERVICE TYPE ROUTE DESCRIPTION DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION ROUTE EXEMPTION END DATE Line 95 Deviated Fixed Route Directly Operated North Shore — Indio September 2013 August 2016 Line 54 Fixed Route Directly Operated Indio — Palm Desert January 2014 December 2017 Line 20 Fixed Route Directly Operated Desert Hot Springs — Palm Desert January 2016 December 2019 56 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2015/16 57 TABLE Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 DRAFT 05.18.2015 SunLine Transit Agency FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan DRAFT 29-May-15 Project Description Total Amount of Funds Total Amount of Funds Without Carryover Total Carryover Amount LTF STA Carryover STA PTMISEA Prop 1B Transit Security Measure Section 5307 Indio/Cathedra I City Palm Springs Section 5310 Section 5311 Carryover Section 5316 Carryover Section 5317 Carryover Section 5339 LONG CMAQ LC TOP CARB Other Revenue Farebox OPERATING Operating Assistance $29,992,743 $29,989,511 $3,232 $14,785,617 $6,492,099 $3,200,000 $359,891 $3,232 $1,614,302 $3,537,602 Vanpool program $118,804 $118,804 $0 $105,524 $13,280 Line 20 $207,054 $207,054 $0 $23,749 $183,305 Line 220 $143,552 $71,776 $71,776 $71,776 $63,742 $8,034 Line 91 $155,907 $155,907 $0 $0 $155,907 Taxi Voucher Program $176,889 $160,315 $16,574 $43,167 $28,000 $16,574 $89,148 Sub -total Operating $30,794,949 $30,703,367 $91,582 $15,029,833 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,492,099 $3,200,000 $28,000 $359,891 $63,742 $27,840 $0 $0 $196,585 $155,907 $0 $1,703,450 $3,537,602 CAPITAL Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds Total Amount of Funds Without Carryover Total Carryover Amount LTF STA Carryover STA PTMISEA Prop 1B Transit Security Measure Section 5307 Indio/Cathedra City Palm Springs Section 5310 Section 5311 Caryover Section 5316 Carryover Section 5317 Carryover Section 5339 LONo CMAQ LC TOP GARB Other Revenue Farebox Replacement(13) Paratransit Vans SL-16-01 $1,560,000 $1,560,000 $0 $265,200 $1,294,800 Transit Enhancement(25 Shelters) SL-16-02 $393,153 $393,153 $0 $373,153 $20,000 Refurbished Hydrogen Fueling Station Thousand Palms SL-16-03 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $0 $300,000 $1,200,000 Information Technology System (IT) Projects SL-16-04 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $60,000 $240,000 Replacement Service Vehicles (3 cars, 2 trucks) SL-16-05 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $40,000 $160,000 Replacement(9) Fixed Route Buses SL-16-06 $5,175,000 $5,175,000 $0 $4,931,311 $243,689 Paratransit Expansion (1) Van (including radio) SL-16-07 $120,000 $120,000 $0 $26,594 $93,406 Bus Expansion (2)Fixed Route Buses SL-16-08 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $0 $176,170 $973,830 Hydrogen Electric Hybrid Fuel Cell Buses (5) SL-16-09 $13,103,860 $10,103,860 $3,000,000 $2,086,196 $300,000 $913,804 $9,803,860 Expansion Hydrogen Fueling Station Thousand Palms SL-16-10 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 Indio Restroom Facilities and Repaving SL-16-11 $500,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 Sub -total Capital $25,502,013 $22,502,013 $3,000,000 $0 $867,964 $2,086,196 $4,931,311 $373,153 $0 $3,458,489 $93,406 $0 $0 $0 $913,804 $9,803,860 $973,830 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 Total Operating B Capital $56,296,962 $53,205,380 $3,091,582 $15,029,833 $867,964 $2,086,196 $4,931,311 $373,153 $6,492,099 $6,658,489 $121,406 $359,891 $63,742 $27,840 $913,804 $9,803,860 $1,170,415 $155,907 $2,000,000 $1,703,450 $3,537,602 Project Funding Details Target Budget Projected FY15/16 LTF Projected FY15/16 Farebox Revenue Projected FY15/16 Other Revenues Projected FY15/16 LC TOP Capital Projected FY15/16 CMAQ Projected FY15/16 Measure A Projected FY15/16 Section 5307 Operating Funds Projected FY15/16 Section 5310 Operating Funds Projected FY15/16 Section 5311 Operating Funds Projected FY15/16 Section 5316 Operating Funds Projected FY15/16 Section 5317 Operating Funds Projected FY15/16 Section 5317 Operating Funds Total Amount of Funds $15,029,833 Based on FY15 new allocation $3,537,602 Based on FY15 forecasted revenue $1,703,450 Based on projections with $999,878 outside fuel sales, $150,000 advertising revenue, $119,000 Bus Shelter Maintenance revenue, $66,621 RTA Metrolink, $175,000 Emissions credit, $60,729 SRA Overhead fee, $89,148 Taxi Voucher sales and other income of $43,074. $155,907 As for FY15/16-Line 91 $196,585 FY14/15 CMAQ for Vanpool is $827,756. $13,280 covers admin fees while pass through expenses is $814,476. CMAQ for Line 20 DHS-PD is $183,805 (If PEPRA issue is not settled, we will request this to be taken from LTF reserves) $6,492,099 As for FY14/15+7,5% $3,200,000 FFY 15 carryover plus some of FFY 16 - 8 PEPRA issue is not settled, we will request this to be taken from LTF reserves $28,000 New grants of Taxi Voucher Program for one year - M PEPRA issue is not settled, we will request this to be taken from LTF reserves 5359,891 As for FY14/15 - If PEPRA issue is not settled, we will request this to be taken from LTF reserves $63,742 Section 5316 carryover Line 220 X148 8 X193 $11,266 Section 5317 carryover Line 220 X063 and admin fees; ILP pass through expenses is $13,000 $16,574 Section 5317 carryover MA Voucher Program X063 Total Estimated Operating Funding Request $30,794,949 Projected FY15/16 STA Capital Projected FY15/16 STA Capital carryover Projected FY15/16 5307 Capital Projected FY15/16 Section 5309 Capital carryover Projected FY15/16 Section 5339 Capital Projected FY15/16 GARB Projected FY15/16 Section 5310 Capital Funds Projected FY15/16 Prop 1B Projected FY15/16 Prop 1B-PTIMSEA Projected FY15/16 CMAQ Capital $867,964 FY15/16 (Expansion of 2 Fixed Route Buses SL-16-08 - added $50,000 from the original local match of $126,170. This project has reference FTIP# RIV140822) $2,086,196 FY14/15 carryover $3,458,489 FFY 15 carryover plus some of FFY 16 (The $300,000 programmed in FY14/15 was reproved from the TEAM application (originally CNG) and now being applied towards LONG project SL-16-09) FTIP# RIV140810. $913,804 FY14/15 carryover $9,803,860 FY15/16 $2,000,000 FY15/16-projects to be applied against GARB funding. $93,406 FY15/16 $373,153 FY15/16 $4,931,311 FY15/16 $973,830 FY14/15 Total Estimated Capital Funding Request $25,502,013 Total Funds Requested $56,296,962 58 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 4A CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2015/16 59 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-01 PROJECT NAME: Replacement (13) Paratransit Vans PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Purchase thirteen (13) replacement compressed natural gas (CNG) vans to replace existing SunDial paratransit vans that have met their useful life based on federal guidelines. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This continues SunLine's goal of replacing its fleet. As a result of thirteen (13) of the existing SunDial paratransit vans having run over 150,000 miles over five (5) years of operation, SunLine will replace these vans. This is consistent with federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of vehicles. Failure to replace these vehicles will result in significantly higher costs to maintain them in operating condition as major parts begin to fail. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 J PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $265,200 FTA Section 5307 $1,294,800 Total $1,560,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 60 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-02 PROJECT NAME: Transit Enhancements (25 Shelters) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Funding requested for transit enhancements consisting of the purchase and installation of twenty-five (25) shelters, including concrete work and other improvement for ADA compliance and improved safety. This project will address FTA requirement to utilize one percent (1%) of the Section 5307 apportionment on transit enhancements and security improvements. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continue improvements to bus stops for the safety and comfort of passengers and ADA accessibility. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount Prop 1B Safety & Security $373,153 FTA Section 5307 $20,000 Total $393,153 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 61 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-03 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Refurbished Hydrogen Fueling Station in Thousand Palms PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will allow SunLine to refurbish the existing Hydrogen Fueling Station. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing hydrogen fueling station in Thousand Palms will have key components reach the point of needing replacement by 2017. The project will identify and construct the best hydrogen producing equipment to support the growing hydrogen electric hybrid fuel cell bus program at SunLine as well as increasing outside hydrogen fuel sales. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $300,000 FTA Section 5307 $1,200,000 Total $1,500,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 62 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-04 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Information Technology System (IT) Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase various IT equipment, software, and hardware for agency needs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Use of IT equipment is critical to the daily functions staff perform and helps streamline operations and reports for SunLine service. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $60,000 FTA Section 5307 $240,000 Total $300,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 63 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-05 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement Non -Revenue Vehicles (3 Relief Cars and 2 Trucks) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase three (3) replacement non -revenue compressed natural gas (CNG) relief cars and two (2) replacement pick-up trucks to replace three (3) existing cars and two (2) existing trucks that have met their useful life based on federal guidelines. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Purchasing the replacement cars and trucks during this fiscal year ensures that SunLine continues to replace older vehicles in the fleet to maintain service reliability and reduce maintenance costs. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $40,000 FTA Section 5307 $160,000 Total $200,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 64 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-06 PROJECT NAME: Replacement (9) Fixed Route Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Purchase nine (9) replacement compressed natural gas (CNG) fixed route buses. These are funds being accumulated towards the replacement of the sixty-six (66) CNG fixed route buses currently operated by SunLine that will become eligible for replacement between years 2018 and 2022. The large scale of this replacement bus program requires an early start of allocating funds. Alternatively, SunLine may utilize these funds to purchase new CNG buses for service expansion, subject to justifying ridership demand and sufficient operating funding availability. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This is in line with SunLine's goal of replacing its fixed route bus fleet in adherence to federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of these buses. Failure to replace such aged buses will cause significant increases in maintenance costs as key components begin to fail. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount PTM ISEA $4,931,311 FTA Section 5307 $243,689 Total $5,175,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 65 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-07 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Paratransit Expansion (1) Van (including radio) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase one (1) compressed natural gas (CNG) paratransit expansion van. These are funds being accumulated towards the purchase of CNG paratransit vehicles. These funds also include the purchase of a radio. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The one (1) expansion bus will be placed in service for additional complementary demand response service for expanded fixed route service. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $26,594 FTA Section 5310 $93,406 Total $120,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 66 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-08 FTIP No: RIV140822 PROJECT NAME: Expansion (2) CNG Fixed Route Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase two (2) compressed natural gas (CNG) fixed route expansion buses. These are funds being accumulated towards the purchase of CNG fixed route vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The addition of two (2) expansion buses will enable SunLine to expand its fixed route fleet to support future service expansions. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $176,170 CMAQ $973,830 Total $1,150,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 67 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-09 FTIP No: RIV140810 PROJECT NAME: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses (5) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase five (5) expansion hydrogen fuel cell buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Bus required to meet growing demand for transit services. SunLine would like to continue its leadership in alternative fuels by acquiring the additional hydrogen fuel cell buses. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 FY 2022 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA Carryover FY16 $2,086,196 FTA Section 5307 FY16 $300,000 Carryover Section 5339 FY16 $913,804 LoNo FY16 $9,803,860 Total $13,103,860 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 04-0133 RIV140810 SL 10-04 Buy Replacement <30FT Bus $914,000 Z225 RIV140810 SL 15-01 Replace <30FT Bus $300,000 68 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-10 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Expansion Hydrogen Fueling Station in Thousand Palms PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Funding requested will enable SunLine to expand the existing hydrogen fueling station located in Thousand Palms. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The requested funding will allow improvements to be made at the hydrogen fueling station by expanding fuel pressure capacity from 5,000 psi to 10,000 psi. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount CARB $1,500,000 Total $1,500,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 69 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-16-11 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Indio Restroom Facilities and Repaving PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct new restroom facilities at Indio Facility and repaving PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funding requested will enable SunLine to construct new restroom facilities and repave the grounds at Indio Division 2 transit stop. This is a key transfer location with an estimated 400,000 passengers boarding and alighting last year (2014). Div-2 is also a satellite operating and maintenance facility that operates seven (7) days a week. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2016 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount CARB $500,000 Total $500,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 70 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 5.1 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR 2016/17 71 TABLE 5.1 Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 DRAFT 05.18.2015 SunLine Transit Agency FY 2016/17 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan DRAFT 19-May-15 Project Description Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Transit Security Measure A Section 5307 Indio/Cathedral City Palm Springs Section 5311 CMAQ Carryover Other Revenue Farebox OPERATING Operating Assistance $30,778,087 $14,645,823 $6,856,704 $3,500,000 $429,687 $1,737,519 $3,608,354 Vanpool program $72,350 $59,070 $13,280 Line 20 $212,231 $24,343 $187,888' Sub -total Operating $31,062,668 $14,729,236 $0 $0 $6,856,704 $3,500,000 $429,687 $201,168 $1,737,519 $3,608,354 CAPITAL Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Transit Security Measure A Section 5307 Indio/Cathedral City Palm Springs Section 5311 CMAQ Carryover Other Revenue Farebox Bus Rehabilitation (20) Buses SL-17-01 $1,100,000 $220,000 $880,000 Paratransit (14) Replacement Vans SL-17-02 $1,756,160 $351,232 $1,404,928 Expansion (1) Paratransit Van SL-17-03 $125,440 $25,088 $100,352 Transit Enhancement (25 Shelters) SL-17-04 $392,417 $372,417 $20,000 Information Technology (IT) Projects SL-17-05 $200,000 $40,000 $160,000 Facility Improvements SL-17-06 $100,000 $20,000 $80,000 Replacement (6) Non Revenue Service Vehicles SL-17-07 $330,000 $66,000 $264,000 Replacement (9) Fixed Route Buses SL-17-08 $5,400,000 $1,080,000 $4,320,000 Expansion (3) Fixed Route Buses SL-17-09 $1,800,000 $360,000 $1,440,000 Sub -total Capital $11,204,017 $0 $2,162,320 $372,417 $0 $8,669,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Operating & Capital $42,266,685 $14,729,236 $2,162,320 $372,417 $6,856,704 $12,169,280 $429,687 $201,168 $1,737,519 $3,608,354 Project Funding Details Target Budget Projected FY16/17 LTF Projected FY16/17 Farebox Revenue Projected FY16/17 Other Revenues Projected FY16/17 Measure A Projected FY16/17 Section 5307 Operating Funds Projected FY16/17 CMAQ carryover Projected FY16/17 Section 5311 Operating Funds Total Estimated Operating Funding Request Projected FY16/17 STA Capital Projected FY16/17 5307 Capital Projected FY16/17 Prop 1 B Safety and Security Total Estimated Capital Funding Request $31,062,668 Based on FY15/16 Operating Budget 1 % increase $14,729,236 Based on FY15/16 + some unallocated carryover funds $3,608,354 Based on FY15/16 + 2 % $1,737,519 As for FY14/15 SRTP $6,856,704 As for FY15/16 + 6% $3,500,000 $201,168 FY16/17 CMAQ for Vanpool is $515,000. $13,280 covers admin fees while pass through expenses is $455,930. CMAQ for Line 20 DHS-PD is $187,888 $429,687 $31,062,668 $2,162,320 FY16/17 plus some unallocated carryover $8,669,280 FFY 16 carryover plus some of FFY 17 $372,417 FY14/15level $11,204,017 Total Funds Requested $42,266,685 72 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 5.1.A CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2016/17 73 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bus Rehabilitation (20) buses — Mid-life Overhaul PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Funds requested will enable SunLine to rehabilitate an additional twenty (20) buses that will have reached their six -year age and 250,000 miles of operation. They will receive an overhaul of engine and transmission systems, reupholster seats, faded decals and other visual body defects repaired. Some or all of this work is proposed to be completed by one or more outside contractor(s). PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: There are twenty (20) buses that will pass their six -year age and 250,000-300,000 miles of operation in 2016. In order to preserve these buses in excellent operating condition for their next six (6) years of operation, a mid- life overhaul is proposed. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $220,000 FTA Section 5307 $880,000 Total $ 1,100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 74 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-02 PROJECT NAME: Replacement (14) Paratransit Vans PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Purchase fourteen (14) replacement compressed natural gas (CNG) vans to replace existing SunDial paratransit vans that were delivered in 2013 and will have met their useful life of 150,000 miles or five (5) years in 2018. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This continues SunLine's goal of replacing SunDial paratransit fleet as they reach their 150,000 miles of operation or five (5) years of service. After reaching this milestone, vehicles tend to be less reliable and have significantly higher maintenance costs. Replacing fourteen (14) vans per year will ensure this fleet is maintained in excellent operating condition. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $351,232 FTA Section 5307 $1,404,928 Total $1,756,160 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 75 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-03 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Expansion (1) Paratransit Van PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase one (1) compressed natural gas (CNG) paratransit expansion van. These funds are being accumulated towards the purchase of a CNG paratransit vehicle. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This expansion bus will be placed in service to support additional complementary demand response service for new expanded fixed routes. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $25,088 FTA Section 5307 $100,352 Total $125,440 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 76 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-04 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Transit Enhancements (25 new bus shelters) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Funding requested for transit enhancements, specifically for the purchase and installation of twenty-five (25) new shelters together with concrete pads and other ADA accessibility improvements. This project will address the FTA's requirement to utilize one percent (1%) of the Section 5307 apportionment for transit enhancements and security improvements. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continue improvements to bus stops for the safety and comfort of passengers. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount Prop 113 Safety & Security $372,417 FTA Section 5307 $20,000 Total $392,417 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 77 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-05 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Information Technology System (IT) Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase various IT equipment, software, and hardware for agency needs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Use of IT equipment is critical to the daily functions staff perform and helps to streamline operations and reports for SunLine service. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $40,000 FTA Section 5307 $160,000 Total $200,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 78 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-06 PROJECT NAME: Facility Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Funds requested in this fiscal year will enable SunLine to improve existing facilities in Thousand Palms and Indio. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Project is necessary for facility and ground improvements in Thousand Palms and Indio. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $20,000 FTA Section 5307 $80,000 Total $100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 79 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-07 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement Non -Revenue Service Vehicles (3 Relief Cars and 3 Trucks) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase three (3) replacement non -revenue compressed natural gas (CNG) relief vehicles and three (3) replacement CNG pick-up trucks to replace agency cars and trucks that have met their useful life. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Purchasing the replacement cars and trucks during this fiscal year ensures that SunLine continues to replace older vehicles in the fleet to maintain service reliability and to reduce maintenance costs. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $66,000 FTA Section 5307 $264,000 Total $330,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 80 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-08 PROJECT NAME: Replacement (9) Fixed Route Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Purchase nine (9) replacement compressed natural gas (CNG) fixed route buses. These are additional funds being accumulated towards the replacement of the sixty-six (66) CNG fixed route buses currently operated by SunLine that will become eligible for replacement between years 2018 and 2022. The large scale of this replacement bus program requires an early start in the allocation of funds. SunLine may also purchase CNG buses with these funds for service expansion, subject to demand and operating funding availability. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This is in line with SunLine's goal of replacing its fixed route fleet in adherence to federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of these buses. Failure to replace such aged buses will cause significant increases in maintenance costs as key components begin to fail. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $1,080,000 FTA Section 5307 $4,320,000 Total $5,400,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP /D # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 81 Table 5.1.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-17-09 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Expansion (3) CNG Fixed Route Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase three (3) compressed natural gas (CNG) fixed route expansion buses. These are funds being accumulated towards the purchase of CNG fixed route vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The requested funding will enable SunLine to expand its fixed route fleet to support future service expansions. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $360,000 FTA Section 5307 $1,440,000 Total $1,800,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 82 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 5.2 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR 2017/18 83 TABLE 5.2 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 DRAFT 05.18.2015 SunLine Transit Agency FY 2017/18 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan DRAFT 19-May-15 Project Description Total Amount of Funds LTF STA Prop 1 B Transit Security Measure A Section 5307 Indio/Cathedral City Palm Springs Section 5311 CMAQ Carryover Other Revenue Farebox OPERATING Operating Assistance $31,672,167 $14,995,852 $6,993,838 $3,800,000 $429,687 $1,772,269 $3,680,521 Vanpool program $97,350 $61,938 $35,412 Line 20 $215,190 $24,682 $190,508' Sub -total Operating $31,984,707 $15,082,472 $0 $0 $6,993,838 $3,800,000 $429,687 $225,920 $1,772,269 $3,680,521 CAPITAL Capital Project Number Total Amount of Funds With Carryover LTF STA Prop 1B Transit Security Measure A Section 5307 Indio/Cathedral City Palm Springs Section 5311 CMAQ Carryover Other Revenue Farebox Bus Rehabilitation (21) Buses SL-18-01 $1,155,000 $231,000 $924,000 Paratransit (4) Replacement Vans SL-18-02 $520,000 $104,000 $416,000 Transit Enhancement (25 Shelters) SL-18-03 $392,417 $372,417 $20,000 Information Technology (IT) Projects SL-18-04 $300,000 $60,000 $240,000 Facility Improvements SL-18-05 $100,000 $20,000 $80,000 Replacement Service Vehicles (3 cars, 2 trucks) SL-18-06 $200,000 $40,000 $160,000 Expansion (2) Fixed Route Buses SL-18-07 $1,300,000 $260,000 $1,040,000 Replacement (7) Fixed Route Buses SL-18-08 $4,550,000 $910,000 $3,640,000 Sub -total Capital $8,517,417 $0 $1,625,000 $372,417 $0 $6,520,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Operating & Capital $40,502,124 $15,082,472 $1,625,000 $372,417 $6,993,838 $10,320,000 $429,687 $225,920 $1,772,269 $3,680,521 Project Funding Details Target Budget Projected FY17/18 LTF Projected FY17/18 Farebox Revenue Projected FY17/18 Other Revenues Projected FY17/18 Measure A Projected FY17/18 Section 5307 Operating Funds Projected FY17/18 CMAQ Carryover Projected FY17/18 Section 5311 Operating Funds Total Estimated Operating Funding Request Projected FY16/17 STA Capital Projected FY16/17 5307 Capital Projected FY16/17 Prop 1 B Safety and Security Total Estimated Capital Funding Request $31,984,707 Based on FY16/17 Operating Budget @ 3 % increase $15,082,472 $3,680,521 Based on FY16/17 Operating Budget * 1.02 (2 % increase) $1,772,269 Based on FY16/17 Operating Budget * 1.02 (2% increase) $6,993,838 Based on FY16/17 Operating Budget * 1.02 (2 % increase) $3,800,000 $225,920 FY17/18 CMAQ for Vanpool is $540,000. $35,412 covers admin fees while pass through expenses is $478,062. CMAQ for Line 20 DHS-PD is $190,508 $429,687 $31,984,707 $1,625,000 $6,520,000 $372,417 $8,517,417 Total Funds Requested $40,502,124 84 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 5.2.A CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2017/18 85 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bus Rehabilitation (21) Buses — Mid-life Overhaul PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Funds requested will enable SunLine to rehabilitate an additional twenty-one (21) buses that will have reached their six -year age and 250,000 miles of operation. They will receive an overhaul of engine and transmission systems, reupholster seats, faded decals and other visual body defects repaired. Some or all work is proposed to be completed by one or more outside contractor(s). PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: There are twenty-one (21) buses that will pass their six -year age and 250,000-300,000 miles of operation in 2017. In order to preserve these buses in excellent operating condition for their next six -years of operation, a mid-life overhaul is proposed. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $231,000 FTA Section 5307 $924,000 Total $ 1,155,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 86 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-02 PROJECT NAME: Paratransit (4) Replacement Vans PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Purchase four (4) replacement compressed natural gas (CNG) vans to replace existing SunDial paratransit vans that were delivered in 2013 which will have met their useful life of 150,000 miles or five (5) years in 2018. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This continues SunLine's goal of replacing SunDial paratransit fleet as they reach their 150,000 miles of operation or five (5) years of service. After reaching this milestone, vehicles tend to increase significantly in maintenance costs and safety risk as key parts fail. Replacing four (4) vans per year will ensure this fleet is maintained in excellent operation condition. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $104,000 FTA Section 5307 $416,000 Total $520,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 87 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-03 PROJECT NAME: Transit Enhancements (25 shelters) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Funding requested for transit enhancements, specifically for the purchase and installation of twenty-five (25) new shelters together with concrete pads and other ADA accessibility improvements. This project will address FTA requirement to utilize one percent (1%) of the Section 5307 apportionment for transit enhancements and security improvements. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continue improvements to bus stops for the safety and comfort of passengers. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount Prop 113 Safety & Security $372,417 FTA Section 5307 $20,000 Total $392,417 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 88 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-04 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Information Technology (IT) Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase various IT equipment, software, and hardware for agency needs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Use of IT equipment is critical to the daily functions staff perform and helps to streamline operations and reports for SunLine service. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $60,000 FTA Section 5307 $240,000 Total $300,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 89 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-05 PROJECT NAME: Facility Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Funds requested in this fiscal year will enable SunLine to improve existing facilities in Thousand Palms and Indio. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Project is necessary for facility and ground improvements in Thousand Palms and Indio. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $20,000 FTA Section 5307 $80,000 Total $100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 90 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-06 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement Non -Revenue Service Vehicles (3 cars, 2 trucks) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase three (3) replacement non -revenue compressed natural gas (CNG) relief vehicles and two (2) replacement CNG pick-up trucks to replace agency's cars and trucks that have met their useful life. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Purchasing the replacement cars and trucks during this fiscal year ensures that SunLine continues to replace older vehicles in the fleet to maintain service reliability and reduce maintenance costs. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $40,000 FTA Section 5307 $160,000 Total $200,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 91 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-07 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Expansion (2) Fixed Route Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase two (2) CNG fixed route buses for expansion, subject to demand and operating funding availability. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: These expansion buses will need to be purchased this fiscal year to support an increase in fixed route transit service. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $260,000 FTA Section 5307 $1,040,000 Total $1,300,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 92 Table 5.2.A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: SL-18-08 PROJECT NAME: Replacement (7) Fixed Route Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FTIP No: Purchase seven (7) replacement compressed natural gas (CNG) fixed route buses. These are additional funds being accumulated towards the replacement of the sixty-six (66) CNG fixed route buses currently operated by SunLine that will become eligible for replacement between 2018 and 2022. The large scale of this replacement bus program requires an early start of allocating funds. SunLine also may purchase CNG buses with these funds for service expansion, subject to demand and operating funding availability. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This is in line with SunLine's goal of replacing its fixed route bus fleet in adherence to federal guidelines on useful life expectancy of these buses. Failure to replace such aged buses will cause significant increases in maintenance costs as key components begin to fail. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date FY 2018 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA $910,000 FTA Section 5307 $3,640,000 Total $4,550,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended balance (as of 6/30/15) 93 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 6 PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TDA PERFORMANCE AUDIT 94 AUDITS SunLine successfully completed a State Triennial Audit for FY09/10-11/12 in 2013. The next TDA Audit for FY12/13-14/15 is expected in late 2015. The State Triennial Review was completed by Pacific Management Consultants and did not have any findings. SunLine also successfully completed a Federal Triennial Audit for FY10/11-12/13 in early 2014. There was one finding out of over 20 review areas, regarding the need to advise FTA of the disposal of surplus fleet, and this item has been addressed with FTA. The next Federal Triennial Audit for FY13/14-15/16 is expected in late 2016. TABLE 6 — Progress to Implement TDA Triennial Performance Audit Audit Recommendations Action(s) Taken 1. Develop desktop procedures ensuring the completion of the annual State Controller Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports. (High Priority) This recommendation has been addressed. The FY 2012/13 report has been submitted and this process has been added to the task list. 2. Prepare and submit separate State Controller Reports for general public transit and specialized service. (High Priority) SunLine will submit separate reports to the State Controller, demonstrating SunLine's pro -active approach to compliance with State reporting instructions. 3. Monitor rates of vehicle failures and revenue miles between failures. (High Priority) This metric is being closely monitored by SunLine on a monthly basis. 4. Conduct new rider survey. (Medium Priority) SunLine completed a ridership survey of SunBus passengers in November 2014. Final report was completed and reviewed by the Board in March 2015. 5. Provide enforcement of repeated no-show passengers on SunDial. (Medium Priority) SunLine worked with its ACCESS Advisory Committee in 2014 to approve a new no-show policy to help reduce the number of SunDial's repeat no-show passengers. 95 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 7 SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE TARGETS 96 iilrillll N IMr�r rcmry icapoltila Table T - -.Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan Review Suntine Transit Agency Data Elements FY 2014/15 Plan FY 2014/15 Target FY 2014/15 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 5,217,902 Passenger Mlles 34,851,321 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 285,986.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 4,207,657.0 Total Actual Vehicle Mil. ev 4,690,034.0 Total Operating Expenses $28,009,634 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $4,9B5r958 Net Operating Expenses $23,022,676 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1, tarebox Recovery Ratio I 17.80%I >= 17.80% I 23.90%1 Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $97.94 <= $91.78 $91.24 Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $4.41 >= $3.41 and <= $4.61 $4.08 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.66 >= $0.51 and <= $0.69 $0.56. Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $80.50 >= $61.02 and <= $82.56 $69.41 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $5.17 >= $4.26 and <= $5.76 $1.76 Meets Target 6, Passengers Per Revenue Hour 18.24 >=15.22 and <= 20.59 17.00 Meet Target 7, Passengers Per Revenue Mile 1.24 >= 1.06 and <= 1.44 1.17 Meets Target Note; Must meet at least 4 out of Discretionary Performance Incicators 'Productivity Performance Summary: Met Farebox Recovery mandatory indicator, met 7 of 7 discretionary performance indicators. Service Provider Cnmmentr: 97 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 8 PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/16 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Service Provider; SimLine Transit Agency All Routes Performance Indicator FY 2013/14 End of Year Actual FY 2014/15 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2015/16 Plan FY 2015/16 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 4,823,320 3,654,869 5,143,610 None Passenger Miles 32,259,923 26,807,536 37,677,722 None Revenue Hours 271,911.6 214,491.3 295,655.0 None Tobl Hours 287,79Q.0 227,303,2 314,835.0 None Revenue Miles 3,902,105.2 3,131,217.7 4,367,133.0 None Total Miles 4,32%457.9 3,474,345,0 4,865,023.0 None Operating Casts $75,623,35,, $19,570,124 $30,791,949 None Passenger Revenue $5,052,151 $4,676,369 $5,607,118 None Operating Subsidy $20,571,20,3 $14,893,755 $25,187,831 None Operating Casts Pea Revenue Hour $91.41 $91.24 $101.16 C= $92.12 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $6.57 $6.25 $7.05 None Operating Casts Per Passenger $5.31 $5.35 $5.99 None Farebax RecoveEy, Ratio 19.72% 23.90% 13.20% >= 18.2% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $1.26 $4.08 $4.90 >= $3.47 and <= $4.69 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Pawenger Mile $0.64 50.56 $0.67 >= $0.48 and 4= $0.64 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $75.79 $69.44 $85.19 >= $59.02 and <= $79,86 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $5.27 $4.76 $5.77 3= $9.05 and C= $5.97 Fails to Meet Target Passengers POE Revenue Hour 17.80 17.00 17.40 >= 14.45 and [= 19.55 Meets Target Pas gingers Per Revenue Mile 1.24 1.0 1.18 ->= 0.99 and [= 1.35 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2015/16 Plan to the FY 2015/16 PrimaEy. Target • Fiscal year 2015 YTD savings are a result of not fulfilling a variety of board approved budgeted expenses. Some of these expenses include, but are not limited to, unfilled positions, new initiatives not implemented and training expenses. These expenses were not consumed for many reasons including time & physical constraints. Nevertheless, these expenses are important and the plan is to utilize the expenses in FY16. • Many uncontrollable expenses were identified for FY16 that resulted in an increase in the operating expense request. A majority of the large expense increases can be attributed to increased costs for required pension contributions, insurance costs, projected increase in health coverage costs, and more Paratransit Operators to correspond to the increase in Paratransit service. • In FY15, the CNG rebate revenue was unexpectedly approved for calendar year 2014. This resulted in an increase to SunLine's revenue by $993,752. Again, this CNG rebate revenue is not expected for FY16 so it has not been included in any FY16 budgeted figures. 99 FY 2015/16 SRTP TABLE 9 HIGHLIGHTS OF FY 2015/16 SRTP 100 TABLE 9 HIGHLIGHTS OF FY 2015/16 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • Implement new service and service improvements for FY 2015/16: o Line 20 - New service from Desert Hot Springs to Palm Desert via Interstate 10 o Line 70 - Extend service north of interstate 10 and increase frequency o Line 91 - Increase weekend frequency o Line 95 - Add an early and late trip on weekdays and introduce weekend service o Line 111- Extend service to Coachella o Commuter Link 220 - Add one westbound/eastbound trip • Introduction of SunTaxi service for seniors and the disabled • Introduction of Transportation Demand Management Program to launch vanpools for workers in both the private and public sectors • Continue working with local jurisdictions on bus stop improvements including procurement for more bus shelters. • Continue Taxi Voucher Program in the Coachella Valley. Subject to additional funding availability (CMAQ grants, etc.) and Board approval, further service improvements may be considered in FY 2015/16, but are not included in the FY 2015/16 budget and SRTP at this time. TABLE 9A — Operating and Financial Data Operating & Financial Data FY 11/12 Audited FY 12/13 Audited FY 13/14 Audited FY 14/15 Estimated FY 15/16 Planned Systemwide Ridership 4,561,637 4,707,796 4,823,320 5,217,902 5,143,610 Operating Cost Per Revenue Hr. $89.00 $93.64 $94.41 $97.94 $104.16 101 TABLE 98 — Farebox Calculation Table 9B - Farebox Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY2013/14 Audit FY 14/15 (Estimate) FY 15/16 (Plan) Passenger Fares 3,325,541.00 3,355,030.00 3,537,602.00 Interest 1,685.00 1,713.00 2,400.00 General Fund Supplement - - - Measure A - - 366,066.00 Advertising Revenue 80,825.00 183,225.00 150,000.00 Gain on Sale of Fixed Assets 60,077.00 - - CNG Revenue 1,339,270.00 997,138.00 999,878.00 Lease/Other Revenue - - - Federal Excise Tax Refund - - - Investment Income - - - CalPers CERBT - - - Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes - - - Other Revenues 244, 750.00 1, 331, 355.00 551,172.00 Total Revenue for Farebox 5,052,148.00 5,868,461.00 5,607,118.00 Calculation (1-13) Total Operating Expenses for Farebox Calculation 25,623,354.00 27,093,500.00 30,794,949.00 Farebox Recovery Ratio 19.72% 21.66% 18.21 102 RCTC Rail Short Range Transit Plan FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 FINAL DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1 1.1 Description of Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 1 1.3 Fixed Route Services 2 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure 2 Ticket Types 3 Fare Increase 4 1.5 Revenue Fleet 4 1.6 Existing and Planned Facilities 5 Commuter Rail Station Management 5 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 7 2.1 Fixed Route Service 7 Riverside Line 7 Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line 8 91 Line / Perris Valley Line 9 2.2 Key Performance Indicators 10 91/PVL Line 10 IEOC Line 10 Riverside Line 10 2.3 Trip Generators and Projected Growth 11 2.4 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 12 Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) 12 Station Improvements and Construction of New Facilities 13 RCTC Station Maintenance 13 Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project 13 CHAPTER 3 — SERVICE CHANGES AND REGIONAL PLANNING 15 3.1 Recent Service Changes (Past Year) 15 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications 15 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion 16 3.4 Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Rail Service 16 3.5 LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency 17 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 19 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 19 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program 19 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 19 Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI 20 TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD 20 Alternative Fueled Vehicles 20 TABLE 1 - FLEET INVENTORY 21 TABLE 2 — SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY 22 TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED 23 TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF FUTURE FUNDS REQUESTED 24 TABLE 6 - STATE TRIENNIAL AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS 25 TABLE 7 - SRTP TARGET REPORT 26 TABLE 8 - SRTP PERFORMANCE REPORT 27 TABLE 9 - SRTP HIGHLIGHTS 28 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS BNSF BNSF Railways CETAP Community & Environmental Acceptability Process CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Funds CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments EOM Extra -Ordinary Maintenance FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration IEOC Inland Empire -Orange County Line LACMTA Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority LAUS Los Angeles Union Station LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency LTF Local Transportation Funds MOW Maintenance -of -Way NTD National Transit Database OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PTC Positive Train Control PVL Perris Valley Line RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program SANBAG San Bernardino Associated Governments SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SJBL San Jacinto Branch Line SR State Route SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance Funds STIP State Transportation Improvement Program STP Surface Transportation Program Funds TVM Ticket Vending Machine UP Union Pacific Railroad VCTC Ventura County Transportation Commission r Nom kiserside Woo/ Tronspaimiao Commission CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area Currently, five of the 57 Metrolink stations are located in Western Riverside County. These five stations, Riverside -Downtown, Pedley, La Sierra, West Corona, and North Main Corona, are owned and maintained by RCTC. With the completion of the Perris Valley Line (PVL) in late 2015 an additional four stations will be added, which include: South Perris, Downtown Perris, Moreno Valley/March Field and Riverside - Hunter Park. VEh}TURIs CnuElT lanmsler . Polmdde • Vino Grodeliciun +/ 41a Prhriosso Soma Clark tAx Airport couNav �n Le ■��_�_��••••:= Rirxrslde Hunter Pork nro MontehellolConlm to Indl▪ hy Oownt▪ arm E anlo o Paley Nit �,z Nomono Cmommg 14�f{ Por�ko Norwalk/ i H. Main Soma Fe Springs } t�j�i ps"`�}'114 **Car4RR Fulerlon 1==` Ji.sieui, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0 merralinkirains.cnm METROLINK M17RCUNK ROUTES =Oa Antelope Volley line WPM Inland Empire-Ormge County line IM•a Orange County Line Ma= Riverside line =�S Sm Bernardino tine ■MC Venluro County Clne MOM 91 Line MGM Future Rations EB.m„ s.pru.kw 30, eon M+t= Slaw Served by Ri+dam Multiple Lines Amtrak Pacific Surddiner Wins Roil/Metro Bus {. LAX FFyAway BUS Sm Diego North Counly Tmmil �islricl I!) MAP HOT TO SCALE Rironida NA Main e �a AnoheYn RIVERSIDE Caeyat COUNTY Anaheim 11' oruye � f 1 � Soda Ann 1�f Tusk -1 oln fWayne© Pyine krporr . N Ialu� lilprel/Mkskn INK Son Juon[opano as ORANGE COUNTY Son Clete* }S:,, Oreonidn i'airtoeTrr+ SAN DIEGO Solono Ruch COUNTY •e'CORMT#e Sun Map �� Son (lemenle Pitt 1y. Moreno Vallee/ Ho rh Fell t Domino RMf� r Soulltlara Peals r� 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections Whether traveling to work, school, or one of Southern California's great recreational destinations, Metrolink trains provide a viable alternative to driving alone. Every day, thousands of Southern California residents park their cars and choose Metrolink to commute. The average Metrolink commute from Riverside County is 37 miles. 1 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rInome� Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission Metrolink trains are also popular with schools throughout the region both transporting students to classes and for field trips. The Metrolink rider profiles are updated every two years. The following is the latest socio-economic data collected in 2012: Line Riverside Line IEOC Line 91 Line System -wide Gender: Male 46% 50% 50% 50% Female 54% 50% 50% 50% Ethnicity: Black 19% 12% 19% 17% Hispanic 31 % 23% 25% 27% Asian 19% 6% 18% 13% Native Hawaiian 2% 1 % 2% 2% American Indian 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Caucasian (non -Hispanic) 25% 52% 29% 36% Other 4% 4% 6% 5% Median Income (2010) $84,274 $77,459 $80,357 $76,647 Full -Time Employed 85% 86% 86% 80% Automobile Available 92% 87% 83% 83% 1.3 Fixed Route Services Metrolink regularly operates Monday through Friday. Weekend service operates on a reduced frequency on the IEOC, Orange County and San Bernardino Lines on Saturdays and Sundays with extensions to the Riverside -Downtown Station. IEOC Line Weekend service began July 2006. The 91 Line Weekend Service started on July 5, 2014 with two round trips from Riverside to Los Angeles. In late 2015, PVL will commence operating providing three round trips spanning from South Perris to Los Angeles and six bounce back trips that will go from Perris to Downtown Riverside. This will provide residents within Riverside County commuter rail service during non peak service hours for the first time. There is limited service on New Year's Day on the San Bernardino and Antelope Valley Lines. Trains do not normally operate on the following major holidays: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure Metrolink ticket prices are distance -based and calculated on the shortest driving miles between stations. Each station combination is uniquely priced, based on driving miles from one station to the other. A ride from Downtown Riverside to Los Angeles Union Station is a 59 mile one-way trip; a ride from Downtown Riverside to Irvine is a 40 mile trip. The distance charge is currently capped at 80 miles and this will also be the case with a ride from South Perris to Los Angeles Union Station. Furthermore, RCTC is working with Metrolink to offer promotional fares on the PVL in FY2016. 2 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 MIEN NNW. Rircrside (oomy iionspermrim Commission This pricing program system -wide offers a fair and equitable pricing policy. Over time, Metrolink customers traveling the same distances will pay the same price, and short trips will cost less than longer trips. Metrolink is responsible for any Title VI issues related to fare structure and pricing. The Metrolink ticket price consists of three elements: a base boarding charge, an additional increment related to the number of miles traveled, and finally a modest increment to permit Metrolink passengers to transfer without requiring an additional fare on selected connecting transit operators and a reduced rate on others. Ticket Types There are five types of regular Metrolink tickets. Several ticket types have been discontinued in an effort to simplify operations and reduce costs. One Way Tickets One-way tickets are valid for one trip only, defined as continuous travel away from the origin station to the destination station specified on the ticket. One-way trips must be completed within three hours after purchase of ticket on the day of purchase. The expiration time and date is displayed on the ticket. Types of One-way Tickets sold: Weekday, Youth, Senior/Disabled, Student, and Military. Round Trip Tickets Round trip tickets are valid for two trips only, from and to the origin station and the destination station marked on the ticket. The first leg of a round trip ticket is valid for three hours from purchase. The return ticket is valid for travel anytime on the same day as the first leg of the trip. Types of round trip tickets sold: Weekday, Adult Weekend, Youth Weekend, Senior/Disabled, and Military. Youth: Child: Student: Senior: Disabled: Military: Discounts Ages 6 to 18 Weekdays -regular fare; Weekends, 25% off one way and round trip tickets Three children, age 5 or under, rides free with an adult using a valid ticket 10% discount on all ticket types with proper ID Age 65 and over with valid photo ID with date of birth; 50% off regular adult fare on one way and round trip tickets, 25% off monthly and 7-day passes With proper ID, 50% off regular adult fare on one way and round trip tickets, 25% off monthly and 7-day passes 10% discount on all fares with valid ID 7-Day Pass Valid for unlimited travel during a seven-day period between station pairs starting on the day when the pass is purchased. Monthly Pass Monthly Passes are valid for unlimited travel between the origin station and destination station printed on the pass during the calendar month. Types of monthly passes: Adult, Senior/Disabled, and Student (sold only to participating schools through Metrolink's administrative office). 3 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 `MI=� s� Riverside Emmy ironsporioRon {ommission $10 Weekend Day Pass Metrolink offers the Weekend Pass for only $10 per person. This pass is good for unlimited systemwide travel on Saturday or Sunday only. The Weekend Day Pass is accepted for free transfers to connecting transit services, except Amtrak. Promotional PVL Fares For the introduction of the new PVL service, RCTC along with Metrolink will be offering promotional fares in FY2016 to Metrolink riders. $10 Round Trips — Riverside County trips The proposal is to introduce a $10 round trip fare for travel on the PVL/91 Line. This fare would be valid for trips made between South Perris to West Corona during weekdays. Fare Increase Since Metrolink began operations in 1992, fares have varied year to year. The table below shows how fares have changed recently by Fiscal Year: `04 `05 `06 `07 `08 `09 '10 `11 `12 `13 `14 `15 `16 0% 4% 4.50% 5.50% 3.50% 5.50% 3% 6% 0% 7% 5% 0% 0% Historically, these fare increases have been across-the-board with all ticket types incurring the same price increase. In FY2016, over concern that the past fare increases have put pressure on the affordability of the service, it was determined that there would be no fare increase for the year. Furthermore, Metrolink staff is preparing a comprehensive Fare Study that will evaluate fare, fare structure, and policies to identify opportunities to increase revenue and ridership. In addition to adjusting fares in 2004 to keep pace with inflation, member agencies, including RCTC, also sought a rationalization of the fares charged for travel between the existing Metrolink zones. Over the years, unusual anomalies evolved where stations were placed into zones not necessarily based upon mileage issues but on other local issues. Zone fares were eliminated in July 2005 and replaced by a new fare structure that results in passengers being charged based upon the highway driving mileage between stations. Implementation of this structure was spread over 10 years to minimize financial impacts on individual riders whose particular trip may have been artificially kept low. 1.5 Revenue Fleet The Metrolink fleet is composed of 52 in-service locomotives and 225 commuter rail cars. All of the new Rotem cars have been incorporated into the fleet. 4 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 1.6 Existing and Planned Facilities In planning for a successful commuter rail program in Western Riverside County, RCTC acquired properties for current and future passenger rail service. Commuter Rail Station Management Unlike the other SCRRA county agencies, the Commission owns and operates nine rail stations serving Riverside County: • Riverside -Downtown • Pedley • Riverside -La Sierra • North Main Corona • West Corona • Riverside -Hunter Park (PVL) • Moreno Valley/ -March Field (PVL) • Downtown Perris; and (PVL) • South Perris (PVL) Station operation and maintenance costs are included in the rail program budget with services coordinated by the Commission's staff. Parking is currently free at the stations. The stations operating and maintenance FY 2015/16 budget totals $5,262,100 funded by Western Riverside County Rail Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Measure A and vending machine revenues. The average budget including administration and management overhead is $584,678 per station. San Jacinto Branch Line 5 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rMEM- Ri wide Comity Tonsporlolion Commission The Measure A program provides for Riverside County's participation in the creation of a regional commuter rail system. Though the primary goal was to provide service from Riverside to Los Angeles and Orange counties, the Measure A map included a possible internal element along the former Santa Fe Railroad's San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL). The SJBL corridor extends 38.3 miles between Highgrove and Hemet within Riverside County. The alignment roughly follows the Interstate 215 to Perris where it veers east, parallel to State Route 74 to Hemet and San Jacinto. As part of the regional acquisition of Burlington Northern -Santa Fe (BNSF) properties and use rights, RCTC purchased the 38-mile SJBL and adjacent properties in 1993 for $26 million using Western County Rail Measure A and state rail bonds (Prop 108 of 1990). BNSF retained exclusive freight operating rights, serving its customers along the line and maintaining the right-of-way until such time as passenger service is implemented. The finished construction on the Initial Operating Segment (IOS) of the SJBL for the Perris Valley Line is scheduled to end in September 2015. Operation of the line will open to the public in December 2015. This Line will provide a connection from Moreno Valley's March Air Reserve Base and Perris to mainline rail services in downtown Riverside (see Section 2.5 for more details). 6 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 rInome� Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service The SCRRA operates seven commuter rail lines. Three routes, the Riverside, 91 Line will transition to the Perris Valley, and Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Lines directly serve Western Riverside County, with connecting service available to destinations on the other four lines. Riverside Line This line extends 59.1 miles between the city of Riverside and the Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) along the Union Pacific (UP) Railroad alignment. The route roughly follows the Pomona Freeway corridor (SR60) through the cities and communities of Pedley, Mira Loma, Ontario, Pomona, Walnut, Industry, La Puente, Montebello, and Commerce. Existing stations include Riverside -Downtown, Pedley, East Ontario, Downtown -Pomona, Industry, Montebello/Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, SANBAG, and the LACMTA jointly fund the line. Riverside Line Line Opening: Route miles: Avg Trip Length (miles): Trains Operated/Day: June 1993 59.1 39.3 12 Current Stations Served Riverside -Downtown 4066 Vine Street Pedley 6001 Pedley Road East Ontario 3330 E Francis St Downtown -Pomona 101 N Main Street Industry 600 S Brea Canyon Rd Montebello/Commerce 2000 Flotilla St LA Union Station 800 N Alameda St Currently, five peak -period round -trips and one off-peak round-trip operate Monday through Friday. The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine and Amtrak provide connecting transit service in Riverside County. The scheduled peak -direction trip time between downtown Riverside and LAUS varies between 83 and 88 minutes, including dwell time at intermediate stations. 7 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rMEM— Ri wide Comity Tonsporlolion Commission Inland Empire Orange County (IEOC) Line This line extends 100.1 miles between the city of San Bernardino, in San Bernardino County, and Irvine and San Juan Capistrano, in Orange County, with limited extensions in Oceanside. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeway (SR91) along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) San Bernardino Subdivision in Riverside and Orange County. This commuter rail service to Orange County provides a transportation alternative in one of the busiest corridors in Southern California. The Line is a jointly funded project of the RCTC, SANBAG, and OCTA. When the service began in October 1995, it was the first suburb -to -suburb commuter rail line in the country. One station in San Bernardino County, four stations within Riverside County, eight stations within Orange County, and one station in San Diego County now serve the line. In July 2012 RCTC added one additional peak round-trip for a total of five peak - period round -trips, and three off-peak round -trips operating Monday through Friday. IEOC weekend service began on July 15, 2006. This route was modeled after the successful RCTC-chartered Beach Trains. The service has been reduced to one round trip leaving from San Bernardino to Oceanside in the morning and returning in the afternoon on Saturday and Sunday. The trains make all IEOC stops, plus the San Clemente Pier. The current running time between downtown Riverside and Irvine is approximately 68 minutes. RTA, SunLine, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting transit service. IEOC Line Line Opening: Route miles: Avg Trip Length (miles): Trains Operated/Day: Current Stations Served: San Bernardino Riverside -Downtown Riverside -La Sierra North Main Corona West Corona Anaheim Canyon Orange Santa Ana Tustin Irvine Laguna Niguel San Juan Capistrano San Clemente San Clemente Pier* Oceanside *Weekends only October 1995 100.1 33.8 14 1204 West 3rd St 4066 Vine Street 10901 Indiana Ave 250 E Blaine St 155 S Auto Center Dr 1039 N Pacificenter Dr 194 N Atchison St 1000 E Santa Ana BI 2975 Edinger Ave 15215 Barranca Pkwy 28200 Forbes Rd 26701 Verdugo St 1850 Avenida Estacion Avenida del Mar 235 S Tremont Ave i 1 8 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 rInome� Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission 91 Line / Perris Valley Line This route officially began operating peak -period service on May 6, 2002. With the completion of the Perris Valley Line in late December 2015, the 91 Line will extend the route to 85.6 miles between Riverside and South Perris. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeways (SR215 &SR91) along the BNSF San Bernardino subdivision through Riverside County to Fullerton in Orange County where it continues northwest to downtown Los Angeles. This line will serve existing stations along this line including Riverside -Downtown, Riverside -La Sierra, North Main Corona, West Corona, Fullerton, Buena Park, Norwalk, Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, OCTA, and the LACMTA jointly fund the Line. In December 2015 service will be extended to serve South Perris, Perris Downtown, Moreno Valley -March Fields, Riverside - Hunter Park. The service levels on this route are still developing. Currently, there are three AM peak -period trips from Riverside to Los Angeles with four PM peak period returns. There is one AM reverse peak -period trips from Los Angeles to Riverside with one PM reverse peak -period return. This service operates Monday through Friday. On July 5, 2014 weekend service began with two round trips from Riverside to Los Angeles. In late December 2015, Metrolink will extend the 91 Line service to South Perris and provide passengers three weekday round trips from South Perris to Downtown Los Angeles Union Station. There will also be two reverse peak trains between Los Angeles and Riverside Downtown. A peak return trip from Los Angeles to Riverside Downtown. There will be six bounce back trains between South Perris and Riverside Downtown. 91/PVL Line 91 Line Opening: PVL Line Extension Opening: Route miles: Avg Trip Length (miles): Trains Operated/Day: Current Stations Served: South Perris Perris -Downtown Moreno Valley -March Field Riverside Hunter Park Riverside -Downtown Riverside -La Sierra North Main Corona West Corona Fullerton Buena Park Norwalk Commerce LA Union Station May 2002 Dec 2015 85.6 36.6 13 1304 Case Road 121 South C. Street 14160 Meridian Parkway 1101 Marlborough Ave 4066 Vine St 10901 Indiana Ave 250 E Blaine St 155 S Auto Center Dr 120 E Santa Fe Ave Lakeknoll Dr & Dale St 12700 Imperial Highway 6433 26th St 800 N Alameda St The peak -period running time between South Perris, Downtown Riverside and Los Angeles is approximately 127 minutes. RTA, SunLine, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting service in Riverside County. 9 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 `MI=� s� Riverside Emmy ironsporioRon (ommission 2.2 Key Performance Indicators RCTC will use the following performance indicators provided by SCRRA to measure the effectiveness of the Riverside, IEOC, and 91 Lines: 91/PVL Line Indicator FY13/14 Budgeted FY 14/15 Budgeted FY15/16 Budgeted Unlinked Passenger Trips 780,586 920,497 611,863 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.24 $0.25 $ 0.61 Farebox Recovery Ratio 45.30% 43.20% 26.06% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.44 $0.44 $ 0.86 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $8.74 $8.93 $ 22.56 Operating Expense/Train Mile $64.78 $66.20 $ 92.32 Revenue Recovery 46.10% 43.80% 29.34% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 4 car set) 37.01 37.53 25.23 1EOC Line Indicator FY13/14 Budgeted FY 14/15 Budgeted FY15/16 Budgeted Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,204,021 1,394,020 1,277,620 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.31 $0.30 $ 0.32 Farebox Recovery Ratio 34.70% 33.60% 32.37% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.48 $0.47 $ 0.50 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $11.93 $12.16 $ 12.50 Operating Expense/Train Mile $67.85 $78.76 $ 73.55 Revenue Recovery 36.60% 35.60% 37.14% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 4 car set) 35.35 42.12 37.67 Riverside Line Indicator FY13/14 Budgeted FY 14/15 Budgeted FY15/16 Budgeted Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,289,222 1,324,207 1,216,592 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.14 $0.15 $ 0.09 Farebox Recovery Ratio 57.40% 55.40% 50.55% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.34 $0.34 $ 0.32 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $5.75 $6.01 $ 8.31 Operating Expense/Train Mile $96.55 $98.82 $ 99.57 Revenue Recovery 58.90% 57.10% 48.62% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile (Assumes 4 car set) 70.91 72.83 67.97 10 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rInome m..— Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission 2.3 Trip Generators and Projected Growth Feeder services to stations are vital to the success of commuter rail in Western Riverside County. Coordination and consultation with transit providers and local agencies is an ongoing process. Connecting transit to stations in Western Riverside County is provided by RTA, Sunline, Corona Dial -A -Ride, and the Corona Cruiser. RTA, RCTC, and Metrolink continue to work together to increase awareness of the RTA bus connections at the RCTC Metrolink stations. Ads regularly appear in the RTA Ride Guide promoting free RTA transfers from Metrolink stations. The Ride Guide includes the Metrolink stations in its Route Directory Listing. Additionally, Metrolink occasionally helps promote the RTA CommuterLink service in materials at the stations. In addition to its fixed routes, RTA developed CommuterLink to address commuter needs. This express service provides transit to and from Riverside Metrolink stations and transit centers during peak commuting periods. The program aims to provide a viable transit alternative for commuters, helping mitigate congestion and pollution. The Corona Cruiser, operated by the City of Corona, provides a fixed route schedule but offers some route deviation with advance reservation. Buses run Monday through Saturday and serve the North Main Corona Station as well as stops throughout Corona. SunLine's commuter express service connects residents of the Coachella Valley with the Pass Area and Western Riverside County. The service addresses the transit service gap between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County, providing alternative transportation options to commuting residents of Coachella Valley. For over 10 years, RCTC has actively supported transit connections by establishing agreements with SCRRA and the Riverside County transit providers to provide free transfers for all connecting transit services at Riverside County stations. With the agreement, Metrolink ticket holders can ride both fixed route and Dial -A -Ride services for free as they travel to and from a station in Riverside County. RCTC subsidizes half the fare while Metrolink subsidizes the other half. Feeder buses and transit services are also critically important at the destination end. For the IEOC route, dedicated OCTA shuttle buses meet all peak -period trains at Anaheim Canyon, Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin, and Irvine. Some OCTA buses meet trains at all these stations as well as Laguna Niguel, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente. 11 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rInome� Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission 2.4 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs Commuters boarding at RCTC Metrolink stations are provided with amenities that assist with their daily travel needs. Vending machines stocked with beverages and snacks are available at each station. Station facilities also include wireless internet access, bike lockers, designated parking for motorcycles and carpools. Furthermore, all stations are staffed 24 hours by contracted security guards with patrol vehicles, closed circuit television, and various safety and security enhancements such as fencing and gates. Amenities are also available onboard the train. All train cars are equipped with restrooms, and some of the newer cars contain hook-ups for laptop computers. Additionally, designated bike cars and quiet cars have been added throughout the system. Metrolink has developed the website www.metrolinktrains.com. This site provides passengers with enhanced features allowing for greater content functionality. Improvements include regular service updates on the homepage, improved content management functions, enhanced usability and a more consistent look and feel with features expected by our increasingly web savvy passengers. Additionally, passengers can now subscribe through Twitter to obtain service updates and plan their trips using Google Transit. Metrolink also has an extensive social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, You Tube and related sites. Major needs, which continue to be the focus of RCTC attention for the SRTP FY 2015/16-2017/18, include the following: • Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC); and • Start up of operation on the 91 Line extension into Perris Valley Project. • Start up operations at the newly constructed Riverside Downtown Operations Control Center. • Replacement of Ticket Vending Machines • Rehab/Renovation and or purchases of locomotives Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) PTC has been a major technical undertaking and initial operating elements should be implemented by the end of 2015. PTC will continue to be a priority for Metrolink and RCTC to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The $215 million capital project has been jointly funded by the member agencies and should be implemented prior to the federal deadline of 2015. 12 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rInome m..— Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission Station Improvements and Construction of New Facilities In order to meet the capacity needs of current and future system growth and expansion, the following facilities will be completed or commenced in the upcoming fiscal year: • Construction of a covered passenger waiting and concession area at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station; and • Expand and enhance existing security and station surveillance at Metrolink Station operations. • Expand the parking at the La Sierra Metrolink station RCTC Station Maintenance The Commission fully funds and maintains all of the commuter rail stations in Riverside County, which is unique among the Metrolink member agencies. Since Metrolink service began along the Riverside Line in 1993, the Commission has been maintaining the Riverside Downtown and Pedley stations. When the Inland Empire -Orange County Line began in 1995, the La Sierra and West Corona stations were added. Due to increasing demand, the North Main Corona station was added in 2002. Over the years, the stations show their age and require preventative maintenance. The Commission has always taken pride in the commuter rail stations and intends to invest $2 million to preserve the Commission's assets. Anticipated improvements include: • Comprehensive painting of station structures • Resealing of station parking lots • Improved access for disabled patrons • Drought tolerant landscaping upgrades Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project In December 2015, Metrolink will begin operating trains along the extension. The completion of the project will mark a significant milestone for Riverside County and Metrolink as it is the first expansion of track being added to commuter rail. From 1999 to 2000, funding commitments to the SJBL were sporadic. RCTC successfully implemented the SJBL in the Federal Transportation Efficiency Act for the Twenty -First Century (TEA-21), making it an eligible FTA New Start rail project. In 1998, Congress appropriated $500,000 to the SJBL. These funds have since been drawn down to conduct an Alternatives Analysis, "The San Jacinto Branch Line/I-215 Corridor Study." Through prior action, the Commission has allocated $20 million for the implementation of passenger rail service between Riverside and Perris on the SJBL. In June 2003, the Commission re -adopted the Locally Preferred Alternative as an IOS, the Perris Valley Line (Riverside - Moreno Valley -Perris) Metrolink extension of the 91 Line. The estimated cost to implement the new service is $248 million, for a start up of service by late 2015. Staff has identified the additional 13 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rInome� Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission federal, state, and local sources needed to fund this project. RCTC received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in 2012. RCTC completed project development and final design in 2013. RCTC has received the Small Start Grant Agreement (SSGA) from FTA to provide $75 million for the project in 2013. The Commission has received the following grant funds to date in support of the project: Funding Summary Measure A 64,031,738 CMAQ 2,907,000 FTA 5307 16,157,453 FTA 5309 1,960,000 STP 500,000 FTA 5307 10,000,000 CMAQ 4,298,000 CMAQ FTA 5309 36,514,263 74,999,999 TOTAL 211,368,453 14 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rMEM— RNerside Comity Tonsporlolion Commission CHAPTER 3 — SERVICE CHANGES AND REGIONAL PLANNING 3.1 Recent Service Changes (Past Year) On April 6 and October 52015, Metrolink adjusted the 91 Line schedule to provide additional options to late afternoon and early evening trips. 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications The RCTC rail program consists of planning, programming, advocacy and implementation elements. This SRTP incorporates a variety of activities which support these elements. The FY 2015/16 Capital and Operating Plan reflects the efficiencies implemented since Metrolink's inception. Proposed service maximizes the use of existing rolling stock to relieve overcrowding. The FY 2015/165 proposed budget is under review by all of the member agencies and concurrence is anticipated by June 2015. Riverside Line Service Level Changes No change. 1E0C Line Service Level Changes No change. 91/PVL Line Service Level Changes In late December 2015, Metrolink will extend the 91 Line service to South Perris and provide passengers three weekday round trips from South Perris to Downtown Los Angeles Union Station. There will also be two reverse peak trains between Los Angeles and Riverside Downtown. In addition, a peak return trip will be provided from Los Angeles to Riverside Downtown. There will be six bounce back trains between South Perris and Riverside Downtown. OPERATING SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS FOR FY2015/16 Line/Route Weekday Trains Saturday Trains Sunday Trains Riverside 12 Riverside -LA (UP) IEOC 3 San Bernardino - Irvine 2 San Bernardino - Laguna Niguel 2 San Bernardino - San Juan Capistrano 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 1 Riverside - Irvine 3 Riverside - Laguna Niguel 2 Riverside - Oceanside 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 2 San Bernardino - Oceanside 91/Riv-Ful-LA 9 Riverside -LA (BNSF) 6 Riverside -Perris 4 Riverside -LA 4 Riverside -LA 15 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 rInome� Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission The Commission's goal in participating in a regional commuter rail system is to provide useful transportation alternatives to its residents. To a large degree, this goal has already been achieved. Each morning, over 3,000 Riverside residents board one of Metrolink trains headed for jobs in Orange and Los Angeles counties. These rail commuters also contribute to a reduction in freeway traffic, removing more than 1.5 lanes of peak hour traffic each morning and each afternoon. Notwithstanding this success, a commuter rail service is unlike most of the projects funded by the Commission. The complete benefits of the project are not fully realized upon completion of construction or initial implementation of service. The commuter rail service must increase frequency as the demand increases over time. This increase in service is constrained by the availability of rail vehicles, capacity on the railroad, and available funding. Currently, not all of the Riverside County routes operate at optimal service levels. Two of the three Metrolink lines do not even offer minimum basic coverage during peak travel times. The IEOC and the 91 Line do not yet provide half- hourly headways and thus, their attractiveness to residents and ultimately their ridership and revenue performance are compromised. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion Metrolink will continue outreach to new residents through direct -mail campaigns to homeowners within the system's sphere of service in Riverside County. Additionally, Metrolink is developing a targeted marketing strategy with all its member agencies. RCTC has budgeted for targeted promotion of service during the summer months as well as for the start up of the 91 Line extension. 3.4 Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Rail Service The concept of developing an expanded passenger rail service from Los Angeles to Indio and the Coachella Valley has been discussed for many years. Since FY2015 a separate Short Range Transit Plan was developed for the service. A brief overview is provided in this document. The plan includes new daily round trip Amtrak trains to the Coachella Valley provided through the Amtrak/Caltrans state partnership. RCTC, in conjunction with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), Caltrans Division of Rail and the Federal Railroad Administration will begin the first phase of detailed corridor planning with the initiation of the Service Development Plan (SDP). This SDP will be the first major study that will carefully design a viable service plan with appropriate ridership and service modeling plans. The effort along with completion of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the corridor will allow it to compete for future federal funding. RCTC worked closely with Caltrans to initiate the Alternatives Analysis that has been completed and shows promising ridership potential for the new route. RCTC plans to take the lead on the Service Development Plan study and intends to use Prop 1 B funds to help support the project. 16 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rInome� Riverside County Trenspatioiian Commission In addition, there is local support for this effort from the CVAG Executive Committee who recently directed staff to establish a 90% bus transit/10% passenger rail service funding allocation split for Coachella Valley TDA funds to be phased in over a 3-4 year period. In addition, a MOU will be established between RCTC and CVAG to develop a Coachella Valley Rail Fund that will use both the TDA funds and additional state and local funds to conduct station development studies and provide initial capital funding for station development. It has been determined through numerous studies over the years that the Amtrak intercity option is preferred over a Metrolink commuter option, because of the long trip length and added comfort and amenities on the Amtrak trains and also Amtrak's contractual rights to operate over freight railroads. 3.5 LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is a joint powers authority (JPA) created to oversee the intercity passenger rail service in the travel corridor between San Diego and Los Angeles. This agency has evolved as rail service has been extended to Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo Counties and now includes all counties along the Pacific Surfliner Corridor from San Diego to San Luis Obispo County. The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is tasked with the following functions: • Plan, recommend programs, promote, and identify funding sources for improvements to passenger rail services and facilities in the LOSSAN corridor; • Negotiate for and accept funds to be expended for the purpose of providing and passenger rail services and activities; • Review and comment on facility, service, and operational plans and programs of the agency or agencies operating sub -corridor commuter rail service in the LOSSAN corridor; • Coordinate facility, service, and operational plans and programs with other organizations providing passenger rail service in the Southern California region; and • Advocate improvements to services and facilities for the corridor before local, regional, state, and federal officials and agencies. Carialel WSSA%Reit Ce rida, n4.,. ser�sner iLa5kNvI e.s,eem.,. Hn Leif Lbnpol Ii0R4 Seivan IlAtludingbAzei - gmae kg45peel Jew MBA . ;meunrRaiisomai u Innrming, Q {u. Pad stems improving intercity and commuter The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency does not pay for the operation of any of the passenger rail services within the corridor, but it is a means to help coordinate operations and planning. RCTC has been an active ex-officio member since 2011 and in 2014 with a revised Joint Powers Authority MOU, RCTC is now a full voting member. 17 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rMEM- RNerside Comity Tonsporlolion Commission The passage of Senate Bill 1225 signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September 2012 sets the stage for local control. This bill established a process for transferring the administrative responsibilities for the state -supported intercity passenger rail service along the corridor from Caltrans to a locally governed joint powers authority. This local authority would have more control over schedules, operations, fares, marketing, and coordination with other transit operators. Currently, LOSSAN is in this transfer period and has selected Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to be the managing agency in Southern California. OCTA has taken the lead in coordinating the Interagency Transfer Agreement with Caltrans. These efforts require financial support that is prohibited from coming from Caltrans. RCTC, along with the other member agencies, will be contributing to the start up operation efforts and will be actively engaged in the development of rail service in Southern California. 18 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 rInome m..— Riverside County Lenspatlnllon Commission CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget This SRTP reflects the Commission's commitment to the commuter rail goals in the FY 2015/16 RCTC Budget: • Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving Riverside County; • Extend commuter rail service to Moreno Valley and Perris via the San Jacinto Branch Line; and • Maximize opportunities for public use of rail -related investments. Specific highlights of the FY 2015/16 Budget include: • Expansion of 91 Line weekday service to Perris Valley; • Project Completion of the Perris Valley Line (Riverside - Moreno Valley - Perris) Metrolink extension project; • Continuation of the implementation of Positive Train Control in the Metrolink network; • An additional increase in operating subsidy due to PTC costs and 91 Line expansion into Perris Valley. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program With the passage of Measure A in 1988, $100 million was identified and committed to the development and implementation of a commuter rail system to serve Riverside County residents. The Rail Department uses LTF for operations as well as federal 5307, 5309, 5337 and state Proposition 1 B funds for capital. RCTC holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven member Board. RCTC staff members serve on the five -county Technical Advisory Committee which negotiates service and funding levels based upon the counties' established priorities. Staff also provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and RCTC departments, and linkages to local communities. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Public participation regarding service levels is largely garnered through the bi-annual on -board survey. Public hearings are held prior to any service changes. Daily receipt of feedback from the public is sought through Metrolink's 1-800-371-LINK (5465) and website www.metrolinktrains.com. Additionally, RCTC maintains a customer service number (951) 778-1092, provides service updates through Twitter and receives comments through the www.rctc.org website. 19 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rMEM— Ri wide Comity Tonsporlolion Commission Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI SCRRA is responsible for the regulatory and compliance requirements governing the use of federal and state funds in accordance with ADA and Title VI. Accordingly, RCTC is responsible for additional compliance requirements as it relates to station facilities. All Metrolink trains and stations are accessible to persons with disabilities. TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD The RCTC TDA Triennial Audit was completed in September, 2013. The last audit resulted in no findings as pertained to the Rail Program. The 2015 FTA Triennial Audit is currently being conducted and the final report will be available by June 2015. NTD is reported annually by both SCRRA and RCTC. Alternative Fueled Vehicles Metrolink uses ultra -low sulfur diesel in its locomotives. It has initiated a procurement for state of the art Tier IV emissions level locomotives that should be placed in service in 2017. 20 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 r Riverside fount/ Tronspatiohan Commission TABLE 1 - FLEET INVENTORY NTD ID 90151 Reporter Name Southern Califomia Regional Rail Authority dba: Melva link Report 2014 {Original Submission) Revenue Vehicle Inventory (A-30) - CR PT Fleets Describe Dual ADA Supports Vehicle Total Acnve 0etlicaTed Year Year Fuel Vehicle Seating Standing Ownership Funding RVI ID T e Vehicles Vehicles Fleet Man ufac[urer Other Model Manufactured Rebuilt T a Fuel Length Capacity Ca ac Type Type Accessible Another Yp Manufacturer Type Type 0 p IY p tlY ypVehicles ModerMS Commuter GMC - 878fi Rail mative 16 16 Yes Motors General F59PH 1992 Fuel Diesel erg 0 0 00 PA NFPA Low {RL) Corporation Commuter GMC - 0787 Railomotive 6 Yes Motors General F59PH 1993 Fuel Diesel 58 0 0 OO PR NFPA Loc {RL) Corporation Commuter GMC - 0788 LocoRail motive 8 Yes Motors General F59P1-1I 1995 Fuel Diesel 58 0 0 OO PR NFPA {RL) Corporation Commuter GMC - 8789 Railomotive 2 2 Yes Motors General F59PHI 1995 Fuel Diesel 58 0 0 00 PA NFPA Loc {RL) Corporation Commuter Rail BOM - 8790 Passenger 56 56 Yes Bombardier BILEVEL6 1992 85 149 270 OOPA NFPA 56 Coach Corporation {RP) Commuter Rail BOM - 8791 Passenger 30 30 Yes Bombardier BILEVEL6 1993 85 149 270 OOPA NFPA 3D Coach Corporation {RP) Commuter Rail BOM - 8792 Passenger 12 12 Yes Bombardier BILEVEL6 1997 85 136 270 OOPA NFPA 12 Coach Corporation {RP) Commuter Rail BOM - 0793 Passenger 26 26 Yes Bombardier BILEVEL6 2002 85 140 270 OOPA OF 26 Coach Corporation {RP) Commuter GMC - 079d Rail 4 d Yes General Locomotive Motors {RL) Corporation Commuter GMC - 0795 Rail 1 Yes GeneralLocomotive Motors {RL) Corporation Commuter Rail BOM - 11686 Passenger 2 2 Yes Bombardier BILEVEL6 1994 85 149 270 OOPA NFPA 2 Coach Corporation {RP) Commuter Rail BOM - 11687 Passenger 11 Yes Bombardier BILEVEL6 1998 85 136 270 OOPA NFPA 11 Coach Corporation {RP) Commuter 35288 R Locailomotive {RL) 35289 Commuter Rail Locomotive {RL) 2 2 Yes 13 13 Yes MPT - Motive Power Industries dormer y Boise Locomotive) MPT - Motive Power Industries (former y Boise Locomotive) Commuter Rail PST - F59PHI 2001 F40 1985 MP36 2008 MP36 2009 Diesel Fuel Diesel Fuel Diesel Fuel Diesel Fuel 58 0 0 OOPA OF 58 0 0 OOPA NFPA fib 0 0 OOPA NFPA 68 0 0 OOPA NFPA 35291 Passenger 15 0 Yes Pullman- Comet 1973 85 131 0 TLPA UA Coach Standard {RP) Commuter Rail ZZZ - Olhe r 44882 Passenger 54 54 Yes (Describe)peon,BILEVEL6 2010 Coach {RP) 44883 Commuter 60 60 Yes ZZZ- Other Rolem BILEVEL6 2010 Rail (Describe) 85 121 270 OOPA NFPA 54 85 132 270 OOPA NFPA 60 Toro, 341 326 274 21 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 rIMMENe - RisersiAe County Lenspadoilen Commission TABLE 2-3 — SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY AND ROUTE STATISTICS Data not available from SCRRA at this time. 22 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 RCTC Commuter Rail FY 2015/16 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2015/16 NMMEM Project Description Capital Project Number (t) Total Funds LTF CMAQ LCTOP(5) Farebox Other SCRRA Operating Expenses(2) $ 22,529,166 10,405,000 4,000,000 177,166 7,311,000 636,000 Transit Connections $ 300,000 300,000 - - - - RCTC Rail Operations $ 3,355,800 3,355,800 - - - - RCTC Existing Station Maintenance(3) $ 3,569,800 3,317,300 - - - 252,500 RCTC New PVL Station Maintenance(4) $ 2,350,300 1,944,800 - - - 405,500 Subtotal: Operating $ 32,105,066 $ 19,322,900 $ 4,000,000 $ 177,166 $ 7,311,000 $ 1,294,000 Subtotal: Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital $ 32,105,066 $ 19,322,900 $ 4,000,000 $ 177,166 $ 7,311,000 $ 1,294,000 (1) Not applicable - No capital request (2) Based on initial Metrolink Budget. 'Other' column includes reimbursement from other rail operators: $11,000 Dispatching Services; $625,000 Maintenance of Way (3) This total is for exisiting Metrolink Stations & security costs. Other: est. $246,000 reimbursement from SCRRA for security guards to guard the Riverside Downtown Station layover; $6,500 vending machine revenue (4) Reflects cost for the four new PVL stations and security costs. Other: $159,500 Commuter Assistance pass thru for Perris Station; est. $246,000 from SCRRA reimbursement for security guards (5) Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 14/15 23 Revised 5/29/2015 Summary of FY 2015/16 Funds Requested.xls RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 RCTC Commuter Rail Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 and FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2016/17 IMENI Riverside [ounly iranspnnmion Commission Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds LTF Prop 1 B (Security) CMAQ SCRRA Operating Expenses $ 19,637,000 15,637,000 - 4,000,000 Transit Connections $ 300,000 300,000 - - RCTC Rail Operations and Security $ 5,749,065 5,749,065 - - RCTC Existing Station Maintenance $ 1,798,335 1,798,335 - - RCTC New PVL Station Maintenance $ 1,060,500 1,060,500 - - Subtotal: Operating $ 28,544,900 $ 24,544,900 $ - $ 4,000,000 1 $ - - - - Subtotal: Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital 1 $ 28,544,900 $ 24,544,900 $ - $ 4,000,000 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2017/18 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds LTF Prop 1 B (Security) CMAQ SCRRAOperating Expenses $ 20,541,000 16,541,000 - 4,000,000 Transit Connections $ 300,000 300,000 - - RCTC Rail Operations and Security $ 6,036,518 6,036,518 - - RCTC Existing Station Maintenance $ 1,888,252 1,888,252 - - RCTC New PVL Station Maintenance $ 1,113,525 1,113,525 - - Subtotal: Operating $ 29,879,295 $ 25,879,295 $ - $ 4,000,000 1 $ - - - - Subtotal: Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital $ 29,879,295 $ 25,879,295 $ - $ 4,000,000 24 Revised 05/29/2015 Summary of FY 2016/17 and 2017/18 Funds Requested.xls RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 r MENNI Riverside ConntR Tronsporic lion Commission TABLE 6 — STATE TRIENNIAL AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2009/10 — FY 20011/12) Completion Details No findings N/A 25 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 rIMMENe - RisersiAe County Lenspadoilen Commission TABLE 7 — SRTP TARGET REPORT Due to significant differences in the type and availability of performance data the Commuter Rail Program no longer reports into the RCTC PIP program. 26 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 rIMMENe - RisersiAe County Lenspadoilen Commission TABLE 8 — SRTP PERFORMANCE REPORT Due to significant differences in the type and availability of performance data the Commuter Rail Program no longer reports into the RCTC PIP program. 27 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 — 2017/18 `ar- Evuside iomly irorapnnmian [ommCssion TABLE 9 — SRTP HIGHLIGHTS Specific highlights of the FY 2015/16 Commuter Rail Plans include: o No fare increase; o Completion of construction of the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension; o Major cost increase due to implementation of positive train control and start up operation cost for the 91 Line extension (PVL) ; and o Support development of Coachella Valley corridor rail projects. Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data FY 12/13 Audited FY 13/14 Budgeted FY 14/15 Budgeted FY 15/16 Budgeted Systemwide* Ridership 3,070,685 3,273,829 3,638,724 3,106,075 Operating Costs per Revenue Hour $2,727 $2,727 $3,009 TBD *Ridership is based on the Riverside, IEOC and 91 Lines only. 28 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2015/16 - 2017/18 AGENDA ITEM 8L RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Request for Additional Allocation of Funds for the City of Banning's Municipal Transit System STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Allocate additional operating funds of $132,094 in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds to the city of Banning's Municipal Transit System (Banning Transit); and 2) Amend Banning Transit's FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the additional operating funds. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per Public Utilities Code Section 99245, Transportation Development Act (TDA) claimants are required to submit to the State Controller an annual certified fiscal compliance audit within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year. With the completion of the TDA financial audits for FY 2013/14, it was determined Banning Transit incurred an operating deficit of $132,094. The shortfall was primarily due to underestimated FY 2013/14 operating expenses for internal services (insurance, financial services, etc.) to be paid by Banning Transit to the city of Banning. This amount significantly increased by $68,000 compared to the budgeted amount in FY 2013/14. In addition, Banning Transit incurred an expense of approximately $64,100 for professional services related to the Pass Transit's comprehensive operational analysis (COA) completed in 2014. Sufficient funds for the COA project were previously budgeted in Banning Transit's SRTP FY 2012/13 LTF allocation; however, the full amount was not paid during FY 2012/13 and the remaining payment was not rolled over to the FY 2013/14 budget. Results of Banning Transit's FY 2012/13 TDA audit identified excess funds partly due to unspent moneys intended for the COA project. Consequently, Banning Transit's FY 2013/14 allocation was reduced to account for the FY 2012/13 excess funds. As a result, Banning Transit experienced a shortfall of FY 2013/14 funds after payment of COA balance due when the project was completed in May 2014. Agenda Item 8L 248 City staff requested an additional LTF allocation to cover the shortfall of $132,094 incurred during FY 2013/14. There are adequate Western Riverside LTF funds available in the FY 2014/15 budget to cover the request. Based on the third quarter performance for FY 2014/15, Banning Transit is in compliance with its required farebox recovery ratio of 10 percent, as well as the Commission's approved Productivity Improvement Program. Staff recommends approval of this request; however, city staff shall be advised that future operating deficits will be the responsibility of the city, particularly if the transit agency does not meet its TDA farebox return requirement. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2014/15 Amount: $132,094 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Funds —Western Riverside Apportionment Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: 002210 86101 601 62 86101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-16444.3 Date: 5/21/15 Agenda Item 8L 249 AGENDA ITEM 8M RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Alex Menor, Capital Projects Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement with Jacobs Project Management Co. for Construction Management Services for the Interstate 215 Central Widening Project from Scott Road to Nuevo Road in the City of Perris STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 12-31-034-05, Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 12-31-034-00 with Jacobs Project Management Co. (Jacobs) to provide construction management services for required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out for the Interstate 215 Central widening project, in the amount of $276,857, plus a contingency amount of $27,643, for an additional amount of $304,500, and a total amount not to exceed $13,304,500; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 9, 2012, the Commission approved Agreement No. 12-31-034-00 with Jacobs to provide construction management, engineering surveying, and testing services in the amount of $11,807,334, plus contingency of $1,192,666, for a total amount not to exceed of $13 million. The original agreement amount was $11,531,975. On October 3, 2012, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 1 to perform additional material field testing (gamma -gamma field testing) of cast -in -drilled -hole piles driven where groundwater was encountered on the project, at an estimated cost of $54,398. This was paid from contingency. On November 26, 2012, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 2 to bring on board a subconsultant to prepare a source inspection quality management plan, provide the project with a structural materials representative, and perform source inspection and testing, Agenda Item 8M 250 at an estimated cost of $603,500. Caltrans was originally responsible to perform this work, however a change in Caltrans policy at the start of construction shifted the responsibility to the local agency constructing the project. The additional services were paid from contingency. On May 16, 2013, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 3 to reflect changes in construction management staffing. This was a no cost amendment. On May 4, 2015, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 4 and authorized the use of the remaining contingency of $810,127 to fund the cost of extended construction management services, inspection, and testing services required for the project due to unforeseen circumstances and/or delays caused by weather or other parties. The following is a summary of the agreement and related amendments: Commission Authorized Amount Commission Authorized Contingency Commission Authorized Total Jacobs Agreement Original Authorization: $ 11,531,975 $ 1,468,025 $ 13,000,000 $ 11,531,975 Amendments 1* - - - 54,398 2* - - - 603,500 3 - - - - 4* - - - 810,127 Subtotal 11,531,975 1,468,025 13,000,000 13,000,000 5 (proposed) 276,857 27,643 304,500 304,500 Totals $ 11,808,832 $ 1,495,668 $ 13,304,500 $ 13,304,500 * Includes use of contingency DISCUSSION: The 1-215 Central widening project is about 92 percent complete and is scheduled to have major roadway work completed and start the three-year plant establishment period by the end of September 2015. Staff also anticipates securing relief of maintenance of the roadway improvements except for plant establishment from Caltrans by end of 2015. The plant establishment period is required per Caltrans standards and by the 1-215 Central widening project construction contract specifications. The plant establishment period is to maintain and establish the plantings, landscaping, irrigation lines, and controllers installed by the project for a period of three years. Once the plant establishment period is complete, Commission staff will work to complete project close-out within about six months. The agreement with Jacobs did not include the scope and fee to perform the construction management and inspection activities related to the required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out. When the construction management services were procured, staff contemplated having a Agenda Item 8M 251 different consultant perform the plant establishment and project close-out services for the project. However, staff determined it would be more efficient and cost-effective for Jacob to perform the plant establishment services and project close-out, because it possesses project knowledge of locations of plantings, irrigations lines, sprinklers, and controllers and critical project knowledge in the resolution of contractor contract claims and preparation of the final estimate. Subsequently, staff negotiated the scope and fee with Jacobs to perform additional construction management and inspection services for the required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out services in the amount of $276,857, plus a contingency amount of $27,643, for an additional amount of $304,500. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Agreement No. 12-31-034-05, Amendment No.5 to Agreement No. 12-31-034-00, with Jacobs to provide construction management and inspection services for the required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out for the 1-215 Central widening project, in the amount of $276,857, plus a contingency amount of $27,643 for an additional amount of $304,500, and a total amount not to exceed $13,304,500. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17+ Amount: $65,000 $239,500 Source of Funds: Proposition 1B CMIA or other State Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 003023 81302 262 31 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \i---41Adaii,� Date: 05/21/15 Attachments: Agreement 12-31-034-05 with Jacobs Project Management Co. Agenda Item 8M 252 Agreement No. 12-31-034-05 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, MATERIALS TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES FOR THE INTERSTATE 215 WIDENING, SCOTT ROAD TO NUEVO ROAD PROJECT 1 PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement for Construction Management, Materials Testing and Construction Surveying Services is made and entered into as of this day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") and JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), a Delaware corporation. 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Agreement No. 12- 31-034-00 dated June 21, 2012 for the purpose of providing construction management, engineering surveying and testing services (the "Master Agreement"). 2.2 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement, dated October 3, 2012, for the purpose of clarifying costs for laboratory testing and equipment, clarifying the hourly rate of a subconsultant, to exercise the option to include the additional task of gamma -gamma logging as use of "wet method" construction is anticipated, and to provide for additional compensation for this additional task. 2.3 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Master Agreement, dated November 26, 2012, for the purpose of including the preparation of a Source Inspection Quality Management Plan, the provision of a Structural Material Representative, and the performance of source inspection and testing. 2.4 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Master Agreement, dated May 16, 2013, for the purpose of changing the Registered Landscape Architect Subconsultant and to update portions of the Master Agreement related thereto. 17336.02200\9633612.3 1 253 2.5 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 4 to the Master Agreement, dated May 4, 2015, for the purpose of releasing contingency to fund an increased level of Services required by the Commission for the project, to formalize, through the Commission's standard amendment process, previously entered into binding letter agreements that amend certain terms of the Master Agreement, and to update portions of the Master Agreement related thereto, including an updated organizational chart, revisions to the rate range for Jacobs Quality Manager position, and addition of the Leighton Consulting Project Manager position. 2.6 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement to revise the Scope of Services to add the required three year plant establishment period, project close-out and provide additional compensation for the 1-215 Central Widening Project. 3. TERMS 3.1 The Scope of Services for the Master Agreement shall be amended to include Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, required to provide the required three year plant establishment period and project close-out, as more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment shall be Two Hundred Seventy -Six Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty -Seven Dollars ($276,857). Work shall be performed at the rates set forth in the Master Agreement. 3.3 The total not -to -exceed amount of the Master Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 5, shall be increased from Thirteen Million Dollars ($13,000,000) to Thirteen Million Two Hundred Seventy -Six Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty -Seven Dollars ($13,276,857). 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as previously amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 4, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. 17336.02200\9633612.3 [Signatures on following page] 2 254 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 12-31-034-05 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY JACOBS PROJECT TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MANAGEMENT CO. By: By: Daryl R. Busch, Chair Signature Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02200\9633612.3 3 Its: Secretary 255 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES [Attached behind this page] 17336.02200\9633612.3 JACOBS 21478 Harvill Ave, Suite 2 Perris, CA 92570 1.951.943.8060 Fax 1.951.443.3841 April 13, 2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attention: Alex Menor, ROTC Capital Projects Program Manager Subject: Professional Services Agreement No. 12-31-034dS- A`ft"` Construction Management, Materials Testing an Construction Survey Services For the Interstate 215 Widening, Scott Road to Nuevo Road Project RE: Request for Cost Proposal for Plant Establishment and Closeout Services Dear Mr. Menor, Reference is made to RCTC's email dated March 4, 2015 requesting a cost proposal for inspection and closeout services during the 3 year plant establishment period and Jacobs Proposal dated April 1, 2015. Jacobs' sub -consultant, Vaii Cooper & Associates informed us they inadvertently omitted vehicle and cell phone costs from their cost proposal. Attached for your review is a revised cost proposal which includes services from Jacobs, Vali Cooper and Associates, and Meadows Consulting. The only changes to the cost proposal are the inclusion of VC&A's vehicle and cell phone costs. Please review the proposal at your earliest convenience. If ROTC accepts the proposal. please execute an agreement amendment in the amount of $276,857. Should you have any questions please contact me at 714.412.2262. Regards, Jacobs Project Management Co. Gary Tomasetti, P.E. Project Manager/Resident Engineer Attachment 257 JI COBS Riverside County Transportation Commission Plant Establishment for the 1-215 Widening, Scott Road to Nuevo Road Project Cost Proposal Summary by Firm Firm Labor Cost ❑OCs Total Cost Jacobs $ 94;827 $ 15,000 $ 109,827 Vali Cooper & Associates $ 139.886 $ - $ 139,886 Meadows Consulting $ 27,144 $ - $ 27,144 Grand Total $ 261,857 $ 15,000 $ 276,857 258 JACO B S Riverside County Transportation Commission Plant Establishment for the 1-215 Widening, Scott Road to Nueva Road Project Assumptions 1 Cost proposal is based on contractor beginning plant establishment activities by end of June. 2015 with completion by end ❑f June, 2018. 2 Overtime will be invoiced at 1 1 /2 times direct salary rate with n❑ markup on the prernium portion. 3 Meadows Consulting cost is based on 8 hours per month for 3E months plus an additional 24 hours at closeout for a total of 312 hours. 4 All Jacobs staff are being estimated at field overhead rate, regardless ❑f work location. 5 If contractor does not begin plant establishment services by July 1, 2015, or if services must be extended for reasons out of our control, additional funding may be required. 259 .. I — i t r .r -mg--Ti a f .. MA V H - w :+ I a1 at al al .. ..1 .1 .1 al fi rT :. aI .l .1 .1 .l .. ..1 ..1 W[ �. -• i •ti L 1 .! a U Li f ;= L ...1. . 1. {l A A a 260 SCHEDULE TO SUPPORT Plant Estabfishment Cost Proposal DATED INVOICE SUMMARANBS 3004 1.215 Widening Project, Scott Road to Nuevo Road RCTC Agreement Number 12.31.034.DO 0313011 5 INVOICE SUMMARY Current Period Previous to Date Total to Date Budget Balance (+1-). Rate Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours [ Dollars 1. LABOR _ NAME POSITION Karen Meadows Labor Comp. Specialist $54.55 312.00 $17 016.1 Fi - $0 00 0 00 $0.00 $ - $ - SUBTOTAL LABOR 312.00 $17,018.16 $0.00 0.00 S0.00 S $ 1 2. OVERHEAD (0.45) 57.658.17 Sn 00 $0.00 $ $ 3. FIXED FEE {10%) S2 asi 53 $0 00 Moo $ $ ACTUAL% COMPLETE THIS PERIOD: #DIVl01 PREVIOUS TO DATE: 0.000% TOTAL TO DATE: #DIV101 r Baianca 4. EXPENSES [ Rate Units Dollars UnilS Dollars Units [ Dollars Budget $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0,00 $0.00 $ S0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $ S0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 SOAO $ $0.00 0 S0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 S $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $ $0.00 0 $0.00 0 50.00 0.00 $0 00 S $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0 00 $ $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 5 $0.50 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 OM $0.00 $ Expenses Subtotal Sa.oa $0.00 moo $ 7. r TOTAL $27,143.97 50 00 50 00 5 ..-. 261 Cost Proposal and Schedule for Landscape Architect & Inspection Services 1-215 Central Widening Scott Road to Nuevo Road March 20, 2015 • NM 2,211 2917 MU . . .ar-An arws.o CM-049' AN -la wan m9499—ow24 afa Am -AN AA-144 WON 7484f. Aar-.. J.34.. Ca Om eat 2MOINf .P atl F...srce. Olny maa....ma rat} .0 60 s1 198 50 fa M5 LA-Pal.rliMem 16•46•11.,... AOIA . 12 r7 N s1M54 1e.124 LA•NAM EMONAma rf mrram. ALA 12 12 12 12 Al ;Wm men L,1 • rum Cram,. Iran... ememee ALA 12 12 I 17 as sips so seem La - Plow Everee wr ~um rrWa.. RLA 12 12 . 1E UN OD NM Oxman -Nme WM Am MAMMA 12 N N of 3156 el ir=•652 Wp.mn-Pin Ewe Am/La mm al N fw 12 42 41100. 0N7.001 ea...+-Na E.40 J1vrr./ k.M f7 12 . 1a M 316090 37219 a.p.rm-PIi. Erie ..ear0r. +. 5w 12 ]E w1as.E2 ICON 11166.,6666,1.11.1 Ea 1a 11er16 11736. at cram.. Mee Mma rpm... WA I. 91 M 117OM Yp2 IYV.+T.op.a RV 21 31 2+ 2. pm 011Nm E1646 1MM.w 944ala RA 21 ?? 94 311•114 114127 COIN M.. ouw 1a..t40 II% NMO oo 14.135 arenlarr 1.1 17S 06 sal. nb Assumptions Used. Wonk Sleds June t. 2015 and Ends SepArnber 20. 2019 2 4% Annual Efellad n 3. Ott = 1 6514.. Gee = 10% 4. OOCa -11 3001mman for vehicle and 575/month for cell phone. per employee, based percentage of hours worked 145 MOOT&;60 Puss 7.202 hoofs - 770 h esr7.200 hours = 11 %) NolmO 1 MI ryes oelWe bass pry. hinge henefea overnead, fee and basks geld edumment eduddng licesse. safely goat and hand fools 2 NI hours are Wed 1n ocnrormanos la the Calrlonue Laos Cads NM prmINAV wggs rsquPements 3. Claenl %.11 b• parq only for Mum+wired 4. CCedrad tme may be Wendel Oy 194O119lf Of unforeseen delays Mal wise Owing aOnsuuelron [:AGES proposal may read m to rRvieded should Me OeCuf 3111.01E VALI COOPER S. A .00C IATES- f NC. 262 .N61._...„ Val Cooper & Assoc tales. Inc. •i.a,N4rFI[ 14 VD np allull µ,ha(.1 VI MI Experience Summary Years of Experience: 20 ,Joe Rubalcaba Assistant Resident Engineer Mr. Rubalcaba is a former Caltrans Resident Engineer/Assistant Education: N/A Resident Engineer with over 20 years of experience in landscape and irrigation construction installation and inspection for the Caltrans District 8 Landscape Construction unit. He has worked on various roadway Construction and highway planting projects in both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. He is familiar with the Caltrans Construction Manual, Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Plans for landscaping, irrigation, and erosion control work. He is familiar with the requirements and inspection protocols for the installation of rock blanket, MVPs, highway planting, irrigation systems, and erosion control'D.' Selected Project Experience 1-10 RIVERSIDE AVENUE INTERCHANGE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS — SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS - Rialto, California Mr. Ruhalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction inspection services to oversee the landscape improvements for the I-10/Riverside Avenue interchange landscape improvements contract. Project elements included installation of highway planting, irrigation systems, connections to reclaimed water systems, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking, minor concrete pavement, and rock blanket. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, contract change order administration, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, pay estimate quantities, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans standard specifications and plans. STATE ROUTE 215 FREEWAY WIDENING, SEGMENTS 1 & 2 - SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS - 5an Bernardino, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction inspection services to oversee the rock blanket improvements for Segments 1 & 2 of the State Route 215 Freeway Widening roadway construction contract. Project elements included installation of irrigation system infrastructure, permanent erosion control, and rock blanket. Tasks included day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. STATE ROUTE 215 FREEWAY WIDENING, SEGMENT 3 AT ORANGE SHOW ROAD - SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS - Caltrans District 8, San Bernardino, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction inspection services to oversee the landscape improvements for Segment 3 of the State Route 215 Freeway Widening roadway construction contract. Project elements included installation of highway planting, irrigation systems, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking; permanent erosion control, and rock blanket. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. STATE ROUTE 91/VAN BUREN INTERCHANGE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION — City of Riverside, Riverside, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction services to oversee the landscape improvements for the State Route 91/Van Buren Interchange roadway construction contract. Project 263 Nhin_s ValP Coupe/ & Associates, Inc. Joe Rubalcaba Page 2 elements included installation of highway planting, irrigation systems, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking; permanent erosion control, and rock blanket. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. STATE ROUTES 60/91/215 INTERCHANGE WIDENING AND CONNECTOR RAMPS ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION — Caltrans District 8 — Riverside and Moreno Valley, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction services to oversee the landscape improvements for the State Routes 60/91/215 Interchange Widening and Connector Ramps roadway construction contract. Project elements included installation of rock blanket, irrigation systems infrastructure including mainline, booster pumps, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking; and permanent erosion control. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. Other responsibilities included coordination with the City of Riverside Water Department and Eastern Municipal Water District for the installation of water meters at various locations throughout the project limits. 264 Project Startup, Landscape Architect: 44 hours. 4 hours per month for Landscape Architect. Anticipated PE tasks: 1. Prepare monthly progress report 2. Project coordination with contractor as needed 3. Correspondences with contractor as needed 4. Review submittals as needed 5. Final inspections 6. Prepare and submit project closeout documents Total hours for monthly CM tasks: 160 hours Total hours for PE Project Closeout: 90 hours Total hours Landscape Architect: 290 hours For Landscape Inspector Anticipated PE inspection tasks: 1. Check plants for health, growth, disease, infestation 2. Check planting basins 3. Check tree staking 4. Check weed growth 5. Check trash and debris accumulation 6. Check irrigation systems for full operational and functionality 7. Check for adequate water applications 8. Check for broken pipe, sprinkler heads, valves, etc. 9. Verify fertilizer applications 10. Check plant growth for setback requirements June 1. 2015 through June 30, 2016: 6 hours twice a month = 156 hours July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017: 4 hours once a month = 48 hours July 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018: 4 hours ❑nce a month = 60 hours Total Inspection hours: 264 hours Landscape Architect to conduct ❑nce a month site inspection of Salt Creek and San Jacinto River and t❑ verify the condition and health of the hydroseed mix and to check for any infestations, photo document site conditions, and prepare monthly inspection report (including cataloging of site photos) = 200 hours Landscape Architect to prepare annual report (2 each) in accordance with the USACE Monitoring Requirements.= 16 hours. Total Hours: 216 hours Total Task Order Hours: 770 hours 265 AGENDA ITEM 8N RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Goods Movement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement for On -Call Graphic Design and Communication Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 15-15-065-00 to Geographics for the provision of graphic design and communications services on an as -needed, time and expense basis, pursuant to its proposed fixed unit rates, for a two-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in amount of $2,940,000, plus a contingency amount of $400,000, for a total amount not to exceed $3,340,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission provides information to the public through various channels including public meetings, development of resource materials and fact sheets, the annual report, the Commission's website, the monthly newsletter, as well as the annual budget and financial report. The need for proactive public communication and outreach remains an important priority as the Commission continues to move forward with the delivery of the 2009 Measure A program, the construction and future operations of tolled express lanes, and the expansion of commuter rail services. Outreach will continue to include a proactive effort to work closely with various media formats such as print, radio, internet, and television to increase the understanding and interest in transportation issues, as well as to generate a higher level of media coverage. To assist the Commission with the various graphic design and communication needs, a request for proposal (RFP) was developed and released. The work identified in the RFP was for the provision of services to support graphic design and communication services for various departments including communications, finance, goods movement, and legislation. In addition, several programmatic areas were included in the RFP consisting of commuter rail, freeway service patrol, call box, specialized transit, and the IE 511 program. Agenda Item 8N 266 Procurement Process Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal with price and other factors considered. Non -price factors include elements such as qualifications of firm, personnel and the ability to respond to the Commission's needs for on -call graphic design and communication services as set forth under the terms of RFP No. 15-15-065-00. RFP No. 15-15-065-00 for graphic design and communications services was released by staff on March 23, 2015. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the RFP was posted on the Commission's PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the Commission's website. Utilizing PlanetBids, emails were sent to 46 firms, 8 of which are located in Riverside County. Through the PlanetBids site, 32 firms downloaded the RFP; 7 of these firms are located in Riverside County. A pre -bid conference was held on April 1, and attended by 7 firms; 3 firms are local to Riverside County. Staff responded to all questions submitted by potential proposers prior to the April 9 clarification deadline date. Seven firms — Circlepoint (Los Angeles); Geographics (Riverside); Media Beef, Inc. (Riverside); Moore & Associates, Inc. (Valencia); Simon Wong Engineering, Inc. (Riverside); Tripepi Smith and Associates (Irvine); and We The Creative (Newport Beach) — submitted responsive and responsible statements of proposals prior to the 2:00 p.m. submittal deadline on April 30. Utilizing the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP, all firms were evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of Commission and San Bernardino Associated Governments staff. As a result of the evaluation committee's assessment of the written proposals, the evaluation committee recommends contract award to Geographics to perform on -call graphic design and communications services for a two-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, as this firm earned the highest total evaluation score. The Commission's standard form professional services agreement will be entered into with the consultant subject to any changes approved by the Executive Director, and pursuant to legal counsel review. Staff oversight of the contract will work to maximize the effectiveness of the consultants and minimize costs to the Commission. Agenda Item 8N 267 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2015/16 Amount: $835,000 N/A FY 2016/17+ $2,505,000 Measure A, Local Transportation Fund, Source of Funds: Freeway Service Patrol, Service Budget Adjustment: No N/A Authority for Freeway Emergencies 001001 65520 101 14 65520 $ 10,000 001001 65520 101 15 65520 $ 250,000 001001 65520 101 19 65520 $ 19,500 254199 73704 103 25 73704 $ 357,300 GL/Project Accounting No.: 106 67 65520 $ 40,000 002173 73120 20145 73002 $ 28,200 452124/452131 73704 202 45 73704 $ 120,000 260 26 73002 $ 10,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \11/41,„"j,x1, Date: 05/21/15 Attachment: Standard Form On -Call Professional Services Agreement Agenda Item 8N 268 Agreement No. 15-15-065-00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL GRAPHIC DESIGN AND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES WITH GEOGRAPHICS 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this _ day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") and GEOGRAPHICS ("Consultant"), a California partnership. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional consulting services required by Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is a professional consultant, experienced in providing on -call graphic design and communication services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of Commission. 2.2 Commission desires to engage Consultant to render certain consulting services for on -call graphic design and communication services ("Project") as set forth herein. 3. TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to Commission all labor materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately provide professional consulting services and advice on various issues affecting the decisions of Commission regarding the Project and on other programs and matters affecting Commission, hereinafter referred to as "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first specified above to June 30, 2017, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 17336.00000\8752982.1 269 3.3 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of the Commission, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.4 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, method and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall not be employees of Commission and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.5 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of Commission. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence and experience upon written approval of Commission. In the event that Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to provisions of Section 3.16 of this Agreement. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: 3.7 Commission's Representative. Commission hereby designates the Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's representative shall have the power to act on behalf of Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction from any person other than Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 17336.00000\8752982.1 2 270 3.8 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Lisa van Olden, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his or her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.9 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with Commission staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Commission's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.10 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant shall perform the Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standard generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from Commission, any Services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. 3.11 Laws and Requlations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 17336.00000\8752982.1 3 271 3.12 Insurance. 3.12.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.12.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.12.3 Reserved. 3.12.4Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. 0) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage; (2) Personal 17336.00000\8752982.1 4 272 Injury/Advertising Injury; (3) Premises/Operations Liability; (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability; (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project; (6) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) Broad Form Property Damage; and (9) Independent Consultants Coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from the Commission's insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. 0) The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. (0 Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and 17336.00000\8752982.1 5 273 agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. 0) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set forth hereunder. (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any Insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752982.1 6 274 (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. 3.12.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.12.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.12.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.12.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have 17336.00000\8752982.1 7 275 secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 3.13 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.14 Fees and Payment. 3.14.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The total compensation shall not exceed [ INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT ] ($[ INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT ]) without written approval of Commission's Executive Director ("Total Compensation"). Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.14.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to Commission a monthly statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. Commission shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.14.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Commission. 3.14.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Commission may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by Commission to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate 17336.00000\8752982.1 8 276 would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Commission's Executive Director. 3.15 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.16 Termination of Agreement. 3.16.1 Grounds for Termination. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been fully and adequately rendered to Commission through the effective date of the termination, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.16.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Commission may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined below, and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.16.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.17 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: 17336.00000\8752982.1 9 277 CONSULTANT: Geographics 4178 Chestnut Street Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Lisa van Olden COMMISSION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752982.1 10 278 The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission in order to allow the Commission to pursue legal remedies designed to limit any confidential information required to be disclosed or to assure the confidential treatment of the information following disclosure. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order 17336.00000\8752982.1 11 279 until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.18.4Infringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.20 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such actions. 3.21 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation, the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse the Commission and its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnity shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. This Section 3.21 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752982.1 12 280 3.22 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be supplemented, amended, or modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.23 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.24 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.25 Commission's Right to Employ Other Consultants. The Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.26 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.27 Prohibited Interests and Conflicts. 3.27.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.27.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Commission, during the term of his or her service with Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.27.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 17336.00000\8752982.1 13 281 3.27.4 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission's written consent, prior to accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.28 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provi- sions of Commission's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related Commission programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.29 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.30 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certified that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Commission shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.31 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. 17336.00000\8752982.1 14 282 If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub -consultant for the employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub -consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant. 3.32 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.33 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.34 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.35 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, and the obligations related to receipt of subpoenas or court orders, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 17336.00000\8752982.1 15 283 3.36 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.37 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.38 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.39 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 3.40 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.41 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.42 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.43 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.44 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 17336.00000\8752982.1 16 284 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL GRAPHIC DESIGN AND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY GEOGRAPHICS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Daryl R. Busch Chair Signature Name Title Approved as to Form: Attest: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Its: Secretary General Counsel 17336.00000\8752982.1 17 285 EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES [TO BE INSERTED] EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [TO BE INSERTED] EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION [TO BE INSERTED] Exhibits-1 17336.00000\8752982.1 286 AGENDA ITEM 8L RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Request for Additional Allocation of Funds for the City of Banning's Municipal Transit System STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Allocate additional operating funds of $132,094 in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds to the city of Banning's Municipal Transit System (Banning Transit); and 2) Amend Banning Transit's FY 2014/15 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the additional operating funds. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per Public Utilities Code Section 99245, Transportation Development Act (TDA) claimants are required to submit to the State Controller an annual certified fiscal compliance audit within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year. With the completion of the TDA financial audits for FY 2013/14, it was determined Banning Transit incurred an operating deficit of $132,094. The shortfall was primarily due to underestimated FY 2013/14 operating expenses for internal services (insurance, financial services, etc.) to be paid by Banning Transit to the city of Banning. This amount significantly increased by $68,000 compared to the budgeted amount in FY 2013/14. In addition, Banning Transit incurred an expense of approximately $64,100 for professional services related to the Pass Transit's comprehensive operational analysis (COA) completed in 2014. Sufficient funds for the COA project were previously budgeted in Banning Transit's SRTP FY 2012/13 LTF allocation; however, the full amount was not paid during FY 2012/13 and the remaining payment was not rolled over to the FY 2013/14 budget. Results of Banning Transit's FY 2012/13 TDA audit identified excess funds partly due to unspent moneys intended for the COA project. Consequently, Banning Transit's FY 2013/14 allocation was reduced to account for the FY 2012/13 excess funds. As a result, Banning Transit experienced a shortfall of FY 2013/14 funds after payment of COA balance due when the project was completed in May 2014. Agenda Item 8L 248 City staff requested an additional LTF allocation to cover the shortfall of $132,094 incurred during FY 2013/14. There are adequate Western Riverside LTF funds available in the FY 2014/15 budget to cover the request. Based on the third quarter performance for FY 2014/15, Banning Transit is in compliance with its required farebox recovery ratio of 10 percent, as well as the Commission's approved Productivity Improvement Program. Staff recommends approval of this request; however, city staff shall be advised that future operating deficits will be the responsibility of the city, particularly if the transit agency does not meet its TDA farebox return requirement. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2014/15 Amount: $132,094 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Funds —Western Riverside Apportionment Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: 002210 86101 601 62 86101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-16444.3 Date: 5/21/15 Agenda Item 8L 249 AGENDA ITEM 8M RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Alex Menor, Capital Projects Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement with Jacobs Project Management Co. for Construction Management Services for the Interstate 215 Central Widening Project from Scott Road to Nuevo Road in the City of Perris STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 12-31-034-05, Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 12-31-034-00 with Jacobs Project Management Co. (Jacobs) to provide construction management services for required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out for the Interstate 215 Central widening project, in the amount of $276,857, plus a contingency amount of $27,643, for an additional amount of $304,500, and a total amount not to exceed $13,304,500; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 9, 2012, the Commission approved Agreement No. 12-31-034-00 with Jacobs to provide construction management, engineering surveying, and testing services in the amount of $11,807,334, plus contingency of $1,192,666, for a total amount not to exceed of $13 million. The original agreement amount was $11,531,975. On October 3, 2012, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 1 to perform additional material field testing (gamma -gamma field testing) of cast -in -drilled -hole piles driven where groundwater was encountered on the project, at an estimated cost of $54,398. This was paid from contingency. On November 26, 2012, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 2 to bring on board a subconsultant to prepare a source inspection quality management plan, provide the project with a structural materials representative, and perform source inspection and testing, Agenda Item 8M 250 at an estimated cost of $603,500. Caltrans was originally responsible to perform this work, however a change in Caltrans policy at the start of construction shifted the responsibility to the local agency constructing the project. The additional services were paid from contingency. On May 16, 2013, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 3 to reflect changes in construction management staffing. This was a no cost amendment. On May 4, 2015, the Commission and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 4 and authorized the use of the remaining contingency of $810,127 to fund the cost of extended construction management services, inspection, and testing services required for the project due to unforeseen circumstances and/or delays caused by weather or other parties. The following is a summary of the agreement and related amendments: Commission Authorized Amount Commission Authorized Contingency Commission Authorized Total Jacobs Agreement Original Authorization: $ 11,531,975 $ 1,468,025 $ 13,000,000 $ 11,531,975 Amendments 1* - - - 54,398 2* - - - 603,500 3 - - - - 4* - - - 810,127 Subtotal 11,531,975 1,468,025 13,000,000 13,000,000 5 (proposed) 276,857 27,643 304,500 304,500 Totals $ 11,808,832 $ 1,495,668 $ 13,304,500 $ 13,304,500 * Includes use of contingency DISCUSSION: The 1-215 Central widening project is about 92 percent complete and is scheduled to have major roadway work completed and start the three-year plant establishment period by the end of September 2015. Staff also anticipates securing relief of maintenance of the roadway improvements except for plant establishment from Caltrans by end of 2015. The plant establishment period is required per Caltrans standards and by the 1-215 Central widening project construction contract specifications. The plant establishment period is to maintain and establish the plantings, landscaping, irrigation lines, and controllers installed by the project for a period of three years. Once the plant establishment period is complete, Commission staff will work to complete project close-out within about six months. The agreement with Jacobs did not include the scope and fee to perform the construction management and inspection activities related to the required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out. When the construction management services were procured, staff contemplated having a Agenda Item 8M 251 different consultant perform the plant establishment and project close-out services for the project. However, staff determined it would be more efficient and cost-effective for Jacob to perform the plant establishment services and project close-out, because it possesses project knowledge of locations of plantings, irrigations lines, sprinklers, and controllers and critical project knowledge in the resolution of contractor contract claims and preparation of the final estimate. Subsequently, staff negotiated the scope and fee with Jacobs to perform additional construction management and inspection services for the required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out services in the amount of $276,857, plus a contingency amount of $27,643, for an additional amount of $304,500. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Agreement No. 12-31-034-05, Amendment No.5 to Agreement No. 12-31-034-00, with Jacobs to provide construction management and inspection services for the required three-year plant establishment period and project close-out for the 1-215 Central widening project, in the amount of $276,857, plus a contingency amount of $27,643 for an additional amount of $304,500, and a total amount not to exceed $13,304,500. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17+ Amount: $65,000 $239,500 Source of Funds: Proposition 1B CMIA or other State Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 003023 81302 262 31 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \PQ,i�� Date: 05/21/15 Attachments: Agreement 12-31-034-05 with Jacobs Project Management Co. Agenda Item 8M 252 Agreement No. 12-31-034-05 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, MATERIALS TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES FOR THE INTERSTATE 215 WIDENING, SCOTT ROAD TO NUEVO ROAD PROJECT 1 PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement for Construction Management, Materials Testing and Construction Surveying Services is made and entered into as of this day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") and JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), a Delaware corporation. 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Agreement No. 12- 31-034-00 dated June 21, 2012 for the purpose of providing construction management, engineering surveying and testing services (the "Master Agreement"). 2.2 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement, dated October 3, 2012, for the purpose of clarifying costs for laboratory testing and equipment, clarifying the hourly rate of a subconsultant, to exercise the option to include the additional task of gamma -gamma logging as use of "wet method" construction is anticipated, and to provide for additional compensation for this additional task. 2.3 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Master Agreement, dated November 26, 2012, for the purpose of including the preparation of a Source Inspection Quality Management Plan, the provision of a Structural Material Representative, and the performance of source inspection and testing. 2.4 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Master Agreement, dated May 16, 2013, for the purpose of changing the Registered Landscape Architect Subconsultant and to update portions of the Master Agreement related thereto. 17336.02200\9633612.3 1 253 2.5 The Commission and Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 4 to the Master Agreement, dated May 4, 2015, for the purpose of releasing contingency to fund an increased level of Services required by the Commission for the project, to formalize, through the Commission's standard amendment process, previously entered into binding letter agreements that amend certain terms of the Master Agreement, and to update portions of the Master Agreement related thereto, including an updated organizational chart, revisions to the rate range for Jacobs Quality Manager position, and addition of the Leighton Consulting Project Manager position. 2.6 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement to revise the Scope of Services to add the required three year plant establishment period, project close-out and provide additional compensation for the 1-215 Central Widening Project. 3. TERMS 3.1 The Scope of Services for the Master Agreement shall be amended to include Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, required to provide the required three year plant establishment period and project close-out, as more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment shall be Two Hundred Seventy -Six Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty -Seven Dollars ($276,857). Work shall be performed at the rates set forth in the Master Agreement. 3.3 The total not -to -exceed amount of the Master Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 5, shall be increased from Thirteen Million Dollars ($13,000,000) to Thirteen Million Two Hundred Seventy -Six Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty -Seven Dollars ($13,276,857). 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as previously amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 4, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. 17336.02200\9633612.3 [Signatures on following page] 2 254 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 12-31-034-05 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY JACOBS PROJECT TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MANAGEMENT CO. By: By: Daryl R. Busch, Chair Signature Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.02200\9633612.3 3 Its: Secretary 255 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES [Attached behind this page] 17336.02200\9633612.3 JACOBS 21478 Harvill Ave, Suite 2 Perris, CA 92570 1.951.943.8060 Fax 1.951.443.3841 April 13, 2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attention: Alex Menor, ROTC Capital Projects Program Manager Subject: Professional Services Agreement No. 12-31-034dS- A`ft"` Construction Management, Materials Testing an Construction Survey Services For the Interstate 215 Widening, Scott Road to Nuevo Road Project RE: Request for Cost Proposal for Plant Establishment and Closeout Services Dear Mr. Menor, Reference is made to RCTC's email dated March 4, 2015 requesting a cost proposal for inspection and closeout services during the 3 year plant establishment period and Jacobs Proposal dated April 1, 2015. Jacobs' sub -consultant, Vaii Cooper & Associates informed us they inadvertently omitted vehicle and cell phone costs from their cost proposal. Attached for your review is a revised cost proposal which includes services from Jacobs, Vali Cooper and Associates, and Meadows Consulting. The only changes to the cost proposal are the inclusion of VC&A's vehicle and cell phone costs. Please review the proposal at your earliest convenience. If ROTC accepts the proposal. please execute an agreement amendment in the amount of $276,857. Should you have any questions please contact me at 714.412.2262. Regards, Jacobs Project Management Co. Gary Tomasetti, P.E. Project Manager/Resident Engineer Attachment 257 JI COBS Riverside County Transportation Commission Plant Establishment for the 1-215 Widening, Scott Road to Nuevo Road Project Cost Proposal Summary by Firm Firm Labor Cost ❑OCs Total Cost Jacobs $ 94;827 $ 15,000 $ 109,827 Vali Cooper & Associates $ 139.886 $ - $ 139,886 Meadows Consulting $ 27,144 $ - $ 27,144 Grand Total $ 261,857 $ 15,000 $ 276,857 258 JACO B S Riverside County Transportation Commission Plant Establishment for the 1-215 Widening, Scott Road to Nueva Road Project Assumptions 1 Cost proposal is based on contractor beginning plant establishment activities by end of June. 2015 with completion by end ❑f June, 2018. 2 Overtime will be invoiced at 1 1 /2 times direct salary rate with n❑ markup on the prernium portion. 3 Meadows Consulting cost is based on 8 hours per month for 3E months plus an additional 24 hours at closeout for a total of 312 hours. 4 All Jacobs staff are being estimated at field overhead rate, regardless ❑f work location. 5 If contractor does not begin plant establishment services by July 1, 2015, or if services must be extended for reasons out of our control, additional funding may be required. 259 .. I — i t r .r -mg--Ti a f .. MA V H - w :+ I a1 at al al .. ..1 .1 .1 al fi rT :. aI .l .1 .1 .l .. ..1 ..1 W[ �. -• i •ti L 1 .! a U Li f ;= L ...1. . 1. {l A A a 260 SCHEDULE TO SUPPORT Plant Estabfishment Cost Proposal DATED INVOICE SUMMARANBS 3004 1.215 Widening Project, Scott Road to Nuevo Road RCTC Agreement Number 12.31.034.DO 0313011 5 INVOICE SUMMARY Current Period Previous to Date Total to Date Budget Balance (+1-). Rate Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours [ Dollars 1. LABOR _ NAME POSITION Karen Meadows Labor Comp. Specialist $54.55 312.00 $17 016.1 Fi - $0 00 0 00 $0.00 $ - $ - SUBTOTAL LABOR 312.00 $17,018.16 $0.00 0.00 S0.00 S $ 1 2. OVERHEAD (0.45) 57.658.17 Sn 00 $0.00 $ $ 3. FIXED FEE {10%) S2 asi 53 $0 00 Moo $ $ ACTUAL% COMPLETE THIS PERIOD: #DIVl01 PREVIOUS TO DATE: 0.000% TOTAL TO DATE: #DIV101 r Baianca 4. EXPENSES [ Rate Units Dollars UnilS Dollars Units [ Dollars Budget $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0,00 $0.00 $ S0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $ S0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 SOAO $ $0.00 0 S0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 S $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $ $0.00 0 $0.00 0 50.00 0.00 $0 00 S $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0 00 $ $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 5 $0.50 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 OM $0.00 $ Expenses Subtotal Sa.oa $0.00 moo $ 7. r TOTAL $27,143.97 50 00 50 00 5 ..-. 261 Cost Proposal and Schedule for Landscape Architect & Inspection Services 1-215 Central Widening Scott Road to Nuevo Road March 20, 2015 • NM 2,211 2917 MU . . .ar-An arws.o CM-049' AN -la wan m9499—ow24 afa Am -AN AA-144 WON 7484f. Aar-.. J.34.. Ca Om eat 2MOINf .P atl F...srce. Olny maa....ma rat} .0 60 s1 198 50 fa M5 LA-Pal.rliMem 16•46•11.,... AOIA . 12 r7 N s1M54 1e.124 LA•NAM EMONAma rf mrram. ALA 12 12 12 12 Al ;Wm men L,1 • rum Cram,. Iran... ememee ALA 12 12 I 17 as sips so seem La - Plow Everee wr ~um rrWa.. RLA 12 12 . 1E UN OD NM Oxman -Nme WM Am MAMMA 12 N N of 3156 el ir=•652 Wp.mn-Pin Ewe Am/La mm al N fw 12 42 41100. 0N7.001 ea...+-Na E.40 J1vrr./ k.M f7 12 . 1a M 316090 37219 a.p.rm-PIi. Erie ..ear0r. +. 5w 12 ]E w1as.E2 ICON 11166.,6666,1.11.1 Ea 1a 11er16 11736. at cram.. Mee Mma rpm... WA I. 91 M 117OM Yp2 IYV.+T.op.a RV 21 31 2+ 2. pm 011Nm E1646 1MM.w 944ala RA 21 ?? 94 311•114 114127 COIN M.. ouw 1a..t40 II% NMO oo 14.135 arenlarr 1.1 17S 06 sal. nb Assumptions Used. Wonk Sleds June t. 2015 and Ends SepArnber 20. 2019 2 4% Annual Efellad n 3. Ott = 1 6514.. Gee = 10% 4. OOCa -11 3001mman for vehicle and 575/month for cell phone. per employee, based percentage of hours worked 145 MOOT&;60 Puss 7.202 hoofs - 770 h esr7.200 hours = 11 %) NolmO 1 MI ryes oelWe bass pry. hinge henefea overnead, fee and basks geld edumment eduddng licesse. safely goat and hand fools 2 NI hours are Wed 1n ocnrormanos la the Calrlonue Laos Cads NM prmINAV wggs rsquPements 3. Claenl %.11 b• parq only for Mum+wired 4. CCedrad tme may be Wendel Oy 194O119lf Of unforeseen delays Mal wise Owing aOnsuuelron [:AGES proposal may read m to rRvieded should Me OeCuf 3111.01E VALI COOPER S. A .00C IATES- f NC. 262 .N61._...„ Val Cooper & Assoc tales. Inc. •i.a,N4rFI[ 14 VD np allull µ,ha(.1 VI MI Experience Summary Years of Experience: 20 ,Joe Rubalcaba Assistant Resident Engineer Mr. Rubalcaba is a former Caltrans Resident Engineer/Assistant Education: N/A Resident Engineer with over 20 years of experience in landscape and irrigation construction installation and inspection for the Caltrans District 8 Landscape Construction unit. He has worked on various roadway Construction and highway planting projects in both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. He is familiar with the Caltrans Construction Manual, Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Plans for landscaping, irrigation, and erosion control work. He is familiar with the requirements and inspection protocols for the installation of rock blanket, MVPs, highway planting, irrigation systems, and erosion control'D.' Selected Project Experience 1-10 RIVERSIDE AVENUE INTERCHANGE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS — SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS - Rialto, California Mr. Ruhalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction inspection services to oversee the landscape improvements for the I-10/Riverside Avenue interchange landscape improvements contract. Project elements included installation of highway planting, irrigation systems, connections to reclaimed water systems, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking, minor concrete pavement, and rock blanket. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, contract change order administration, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, pay estimate quantities, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans standard specifications and plans. STATE ROUTE 215 FREEWAY WIDENING, SEGMENTS 1 & 2 - SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS - 5an Bernardino, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction inspection services to oversee the rock blanket improvements for Segments 1 & 2 of the State Route 215 Freeway Widening roadway construction contract. Project elements included installation of irrigation system infrastructure, permanent erosion control, and rock blanket. Tasks included day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. STATE ROUTE 215 FREEWAY WIDENING, SEGMENT 3 AT ORANGE SHOW ROAD - SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS - Caltrans District 8, San Bernardino, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction inspection services to oversee the landscape improvements for Segment 3 of the State Route 215 Freeway Widening roadway construction contract. Project elements included installation of highway planting, irrigation systems, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking; permanent erosion control, and rock blanket. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. STATE ROUTE 91/VAN BUREN INTERCHANGE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION — City of Riverside, Riverside, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction services to oversee the landscape improvements for the State Route 91/Van Buren Interchange roadway construction contract. Project 263 Nhin_s ValP Coupe/ & Associates, Inc. Joe Rubalcaba Page 2 elements included installation of highway planting, irrigation systems, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking; permanent erosion control, and rock blanket. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation, and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. STATE ROUTES 60/91/215 INTERCHANGE WIDENING AND CONNECTOR RAMPS ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION — Caltrans District 8 — Riverside and Moreno Valley, California Mr. Rubalcaba was the Assistant Resident Engineer who provided landscape construction services to oversee the landscape improvements for the State Routes 60/91/215 Interchange Widening and Connector Ramps roadway construction contract. Project elements included installation of rock blanket, irrigation systems infrastructure including mainline, booster pumps, irrigation central control and fiber optic networking; and permanent erosion control. Tasks include day-to-day inspection and oversight of current construction operations and workmanship, material inspection for conformance with the project specifications, quantity pay estimates, conflict resolution, contract plan and document interpretation and enforcement of Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. Other responsibilities included coordination with the City of Riverside Water Department and Eastern Municipal Water District for the installation of water meters at various locations throughout the project limits. 264 Project Startup, Landscape Architect: 44 hours. 4 hours per month for Landscape Architect. Anticipated PE tasks: 1. Prepare monthly progress report 2. Project coordination with contractor as needed 3. Correspondences with contractor as needed 4. Review submittals as needed 5. Final inspections 6. Prepare and submit project closeout documents Total hours for monthly CM tasks: 160 hours Total hours for PE Project Closeout: 90 hours Total hours Landscape Architect: 290 hours For Landscape Inspector Anticipated PE inspection tasks: 1. Check plants for health, growth, disease, infestation 2. Check planting basins 3. Check tree staking 4. Check weed growth 5. Check trash and debris accumulation 6. Check irrigation systems for full operational and functionality 7. Check for adequate water applications 8. Check for broken pipe, sprinkler heads, valves, etc. 9. Verify fertilizer applications 10. Check plant growth for setback requirements June 1. 2015 through June 30, 2016: 6 hours twice a month = 156 hours July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017: 4 hours once a month = 48 hours July 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018: 4 hours ❑nce a month = 60 hours Total Inspection hours: 264 hours Landscape Architect to conduct ❑nce a month site inspection of Salt Creek and San Jacinto River and t❑ verify the condition and health of the hydroseed mix and to check for any infestations, photo document site conditions, and prepare monthly inspection report (including cataloging of site photos) = 200 hours Landscape Architect to prepare annual report (2 each) in accordance with the USACE Monitoring Requirements.= 16 hours. Total Hours: 216 hours Total Task Order Hours: 770 hours 265 AGENDA ITEM 8N RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Goods Movement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement for On -Call Graphic Design and Communication Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 15-15-065-00 to Geographics for the provision of graphic design and communications services on an as -needed, time and expense basis, pursuant to its proposed fixed unit rates, for a two-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in amount of $2,940,000, plus a contingency amount of $400,000, for a total amount not to exceed $3,340,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission provides information to the public through various channels including public meetings, development of resource materials and fact sheets, the annual report, the Commission's website, the monthly newsletter, as well as the annual budget and financial report. The need for proactive public communication and outreach remains an important priority as the Commission continues to move forward with the delivery of the 2009 Measure A program, the construction and future operations of tolled express lanes, and the expansion of commuter rail services. Outreach will continue to include a proactive effort to work closely with various media formats such as print, radio, internet, and television to increase the understanding and interest in transportation issues, as well as to generate a higher level of media coverage. To assist the Commission with the various graphic design and communication needs, a request for proposal (RFP) was developed and released. The work identified in the RFP was for the provision of services to support graphic design and communication services for various departments including communications, finance, goods movement, and legislation. In addition, several programmatic areas were included in the RFP consisting of commuter rail, freeway service patrol, call box, specialized transit, and the IE 511 program. Agenda Item 8N 266 Procurement Process Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal with price and other factors considered. Non -price factors include elements such as qualifications of firm, personnel and the ability to respond to the Commission's needs for on -call graphic design and communication services as set forth under the terms of RFP No. 15-15-065-00. RFP No. 15-15-065-00 for graphic design and communications services was released by staff on March 23, 2015. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the RFP was posted on the Commission's PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the Commission's website. Utilizing PlanetBids, emails were sent to 46 firms, 8 of which are located in Riverside County. Through the PlanetBids site, 32 firms downloaded the RFP; 7 of these firms are located in Riverside County. A pre -bid conference was held on April 1, and attended by 7 firms; 3 firms are local to Riverside County. Staff responded to all questions submitted by potential proposers prior to the April 9 clarification deadline date. Seven firms — Circlepoint (Los Angeles); Geographics (Riverside); Media Beef, Inc. (Riverside); Moore & Associates, Inc. (Valencia); Simon Wong Engineering, Inc. (Riverside); Tripepi Smith and Associates (Irvine); and We The Creative (Newport Beach) — submitted responsive and responsible statements of proposals prior to the 2:00 p.m. submittal deadline on April 30. Utilizing the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP, all firms were evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of Commission and San Bernardino Associated Governments staff. As a result of the evaluation committee's assessment of the written proposals, the evaluation committee recommends contract award to Geographics to perform on -call graphic design and communications services for a two-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, as this firm earned the highest total evaluation score. The Commission's standard form professional services agreement will be entered into with the consultant subject to any changes approved by the Executive Director, and pursuant to legal counsel review. Staff oversight of the contract will work to maximize the effectiveness of the consultants and minimize costs to the Commission. Agenda Item 8N 267 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2015/16 Amount: $835,000 N/A FY 2016/17+ $2,505,000 Measure A, Local Transportation Fund, Source of Funds: Freeway Service Patrol, Service Budget Adjustment: No N/A Authority for Freeway Emergencies 001001 65520 101 14 65520 $ 10,000 001001 65520 101 15 65520 $ 250,000 001001 65520 101 19 65520 $ 19,500 254199 73704 103 25 73704 $ 357,300 GL/Project Accounting No.: 106 67 65520 $ 40,000 002173 73120 20145 73002 $ 28,200 452124/452131 73704 202 45 73704 $ 120,000 260 26 73002 $ 10,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \Aff,v_it ,lux Date: 05/21/15 Attachment: Standard Form On -Call Professional Services Agreement Agenda Item 8N 268 Agreement No. 15-15-065-00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL GRAPHIC DESIGN AND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES WITH GEOGRAPHICS 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this _ day of , 2015, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") and GEOGRAPHICS ("Consultant"), a California partnership. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional consulting services required by Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is a professional consultant, experienced in providing on -call graphic design and communication services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of Commission. 2.2 Commission desires to engage Consultant to render certain consulting services for on -call graphic design and communication services ("Project") as set forth herein. 3. TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to Commission all labor materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately provide professional consulting services and advice on various issues affecting the decisions of Commission regarding the Project and on other programs and matters affecting Commission, hereinafter referred to as "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first specified above to June 30, 2017, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 17336.00000\8752982.1 269 3.3 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of the Commission, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.4 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, method and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall not be employees of Commission and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.5 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of Commission. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence and experience upon written approval of Commission. In the event that Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to provisions of Section 3.16 of this Agreement. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: 3.7 Commission's Representative. Commission hereby designates the Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's representative shall have the power to act on behalf of Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction from any person other than Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 17336.00000\8752982.1 2 270 3.8 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Lisa van Olden, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his or her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.9 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with Commission staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Commission's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.10 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant shall perform the Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standard generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from Commission, any Services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. 3.11 Laws and Requlations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 17336.00000\8752982.1 3 271 3.12 Insurance. 3.12.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.12.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.12.3 Reserved. 3.12.4Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. 0) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage; (2) Personal 17336.00000\8752982.1 4 272 Injury/Advertising Injury; (3) Premises/Operations Liability; (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability; (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project; (6) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) Broad Form Property Damage; and (9) Independent Consultants Coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from the Commission's insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. 0) The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. (0 Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and 17336.00000\8752982.1 5 273 agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. 0) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set forth hereunder. (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any Insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752982.1 6 274 (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. 3.12.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.12.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.12.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.12.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have 17336.00000\8752982.1 7 275 secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 3.13 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.14 Fees and Payment. 3.14.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The total compensation shall not exceed [ INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT ] ($[ INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT ]) without written approval of Commission's Executive Director ("Total Compensation"). Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.14.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to Commission a monthly statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. Commission shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.14.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Commission. 3.14.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Commission may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by Commission to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate 17336.00000\8752982.1 8 276 would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Commission's Executive Director. 3.15 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.16 Termination of Agreement. 3.16.1 Grounds for Termination. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been fully and adequately rendered to Commission through the effective date of the termination, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.16.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Commission may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined below, and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.16.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.17 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: 17336.00000\8752982.1 9 277 CONSULTANT: Geographics 4178 Chestnut Street Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Lisa van Olden COMMISSION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752982.1 10 278 The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission in order to allow the Commission to pursue legal remedies designed to limit any confidential information required to be disclosed or to assure the confidential treatment of the information following disclosure. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order 17336.00000\8752982.1 11 279 until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.18.4Infringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.20 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such actions. 3.21 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation, the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse the Commission and its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnity shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. This Section 3.21 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. 17336.00000\8752982.1 12 280 3.22 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be supplemented, amended, or modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.23 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.24 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.25 Commission's Right to Employ Other Consultants. The Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.26 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.27 Prohibited Interests and Conflicts. 3.27.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.27.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Commission, during the term of his or her service with Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.27.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 17336.00000\8752982.1 13 281 3.27.4 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission's written consent, prior to accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.28 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provi- sions of Commission's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related Commission programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.29 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.30 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certified that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Commission shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.31 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. 17336.00000\8752982.1 14 282 If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub -consultant for the employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub -consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant. 3.32 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.33 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.34 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.35 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, and the obligations related to receipt of subpoenas or court orders, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 17336.00000\8752982.1 15 283 3.36 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.37 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.38 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.39 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 3.40 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.41 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.42 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.43 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.44 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 17336.00000\8752982.1 16 284 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL GRAPHIC DESIGN AND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY GEOGRAPHICS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Daryl R. Busch Chair Signature Name Title Approved as to Form: Attest: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Its: Secretary General Counsel 17336.00000\8752982.1 17 285 EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES [TO BE INSERTED] EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [TO BE INSERTED] EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION [TO BE INSERTED] Exhibits-1 17336.00000\8752982.1 286 AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jillian Guizado, Staff Analyst Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2015/16 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Funding Recommendations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2015/16 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program recommended funding of $2,752,015. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, two percent of the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) revenue is set aside for use on bicycle and pedestrian facility projects through the Commission's SB 821 Program. This is a discretionary program administered by the Commission. At its March 2014 meeting, the Commission approved the Technical Advisory Committee's subcommittee (TAC subcommittee) recommendation to extend the SB 821 Call for Projects from an annual basis to a biennial basis. It also set the call release date for the first Monday of every other February and the close date for the last Thursday of every other April, beginning February 2015. In January 2015, the Commission approved the TAC subcommittee's final recommendations to revise and update the SB 821 adopted policies, evaluation criteria, and evaluation committee composition. One of the newly adopted policies is for staff to monitor allocations to Western County cities versus Coachella Valley cities to ensure equity. Changes to the evaluation criteria were focused toward reducing the imbalance of bicycle projects submitted by eligible jurisdictions. It was not recommended to add a scoring component for disadvantaged communities, but staff committed to monitoring future allocations to ensure the evaluation criteria does not have a natural bias toward projects located outside of disadvantaged communities. Agenda Item 9 287 DISCUSSION: Consistent with Commission policy, staff released the call for projects on February 2. The cities within the county and the county itself were notified that an estimated $3,308,523 would be available for programming in FY 2015/16 through the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program. Proposals were due April 30. The Commission received 22 project proposals, totaling $2,752,015 in SB 821 funding requests, which is attached. Staff reviewed all 22 proposals to ensure project eligibility within the SB 821 adopted policies, which is also attached. Due to the call for projects coming in undersubscribed, an evaluation committee was not convened. All 22 projects are recommended for funding as indicated in the attachment. Staff is recommending the $556,508 of unallocated SB 821 funds be placed in reserves for the time being. If an agency identifies a shovel -ready bicycle or pedestrian project with a funding need, the Commission can approve allocation of funds for the project. Should multiple projects be submitted and exceed the available reserve, another call for projects may be conducted to ensure a fair and competitive process for allocating the remaining funds. In the event no projects are submitted, the reserve funds will be used to supplement the funding available for the FY 2017/18 call for projects. Based on this call, more bicycle projects were submitted than in recent history; 32 percent of projects submitted are located in the Coachella Valley, with a total recommended allocation of 27 percent; and 73 percent of projects submitted are located within a disadvantaged community. Per the Commission's SB 821 adopted policies, jurisdictions receiving an allocation have 24 months to complete approved projects and submit claim forms. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Amount: $1,986,000 $ 766,015 Source of Funds: LTF Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 601 62 86106 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \P4,1, Date: 05/21/15 Attachments: 1) SB 821 FY 2015/16 Recommended Funding 2) SB 821 Adopted Policies Agenda Item 9 288 ATTACHMENT 1 Agency Beaumont Desert Hot Springs Eastvale Hemet Indian Wells Indio Jurupa Valley Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore Moreno Valley Palm Springs Palm Springs Perris Riverside Riverside Riverside County Riverside County Riverside County Riverside County San Jacinto Wildomar Wildomar RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FY 2015/16 RECOMMENDED FUNDING Project Description 8th Street Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement Cabot Yerxa School Sidewalk Pedestrian Safety Improvements Pedestrian Pathway Connectivity Project Washington Street Sidewalk Highway 111 Pedestrian Improvements: Madison to Rubidoux Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Elsinore Middle School Area Missing Link Sidewalk Rosetta Canyon Bicycle Lanes Citywide Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Enhancements Indian Canyon Drive Sidewalk: South of San Rafael Drive Indian Canyon Drive Sidewalk: South of Racquet Club Road Perris Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements Campbell and Babb Avenue Sidewalks Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Improvements Alessandro Boulevard Bike Lane Project Grand Avenue Sidewalk Safety Improvement: n/o Lakeland Village School Polk Street Sidewalk Improvement Ramon Road Sidewalk Safety Improvement Lyon Avenue Pedestrian Path Grand Avenue Bike Lane: Phase I Grand Avenue Bike Lane: Phase II Total SB 821 Funds Project Cost Requested $ 320,000 $ 204,000 $ 145,000 $ 145,000 $ 277,000 $ 138,500 $ 125,000 $ 62,500 $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ 434,800 $ 217,400 $ 107,100 $ 53,550 $ 595,000 $ 297,500 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 525,000 $ 315,000 $ 152,045 $ 66,235 $ 168,935 $ 65,715 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 428,220 $ 214,110 $ 156,125 $ 121,505 $ 217,000 $ 108,500 $ 270,000 $ 135,000 $ 280,000 $ 140,000 $ 163,000 $ 81,500 $ 80,000 $ 40,000 $ 949,500 $ 109,000 $ 1,019,100 $ 117,000 Recommended Allocation $ 204,000 $ 145,000 $ 138,500 $ 62,500 $ 20,000 $ 217,400 $ 53,550 $ 297,500 $ 50,000 $ 315,000 $ 66,235 $ 65,715 $ 50,000 $ 214,110 $ 121,505 $ 108,500 $ 135,000 $ 140,000 $ 81,500 $ 40,000 $ 109,000 $ 117,000 Cummulative Funds Allocated $ 204,000 $ 349,000 $ 487,500 $ 550,000 $ 570,000 $ 787,400 $ 840,950 $ 1,138,450 $ 1,188,450 $ 1,503,450 $ 1,569,685 $ 1,635,400 $ 1,685,400 $ 1,899,510 $ 2,021,015 $ 2,129,515 $ 2,264,515 $ 2,404,515 $ 2,486,015 $ 2,526,015 $ 2,635,015 $ 2,752,015 Bike Project x x x x x Ped Project x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Coachella Valley Project x x x x Disadvantaged Community x x Totals $ 6,652,825 $ 2,752,015 $ 2,752,015 8 of 22 18 of 22 7 of 22 (32%) 16 of 22 (73%) 289 Attachment 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ARTICLE 3 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM ADOPTED POLICIES Transportation Development Act Policies 1. Up to 5% of Article 3 apportionment can be used to supplement other funding sources used for bicycle and safety education programs; the allocation cannot be used to fully fund the salary of a person working on these programs. 2. Article 3 money shall be allocated for the construction, including related engineering expenses, of the facilities, or for bicycle safety education programs. 3. Money may be allocated for the maintenance of bicycling trails, which are closed to motorized traffic. 4. Facilities provided for the use of bicycles may include projects that serve the needs of commuting bicyclists, including, but not limited to, new trails serving major transportation corridors, secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park and ride lots, and transit terminals where other funds are available. 5. Within 30 days after receiving a request for a review from any city or county, the transportation -planning agency shall review its allocations. 6. Up to 20 percent of the amount available each year to a city or county may be allocated to restripe Class II bicycle lanes. 7. A portion of each city's allocation may also be used to develop comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian plans. Plans must emphasize bike/pedestrian facilities that support utilitarian bike/pedestrian travel rather than solely recreational activities; a maximum of one entire allocation per five years may be used for plan development. 8. Allowable maintenance activities for the local funds are limited to maintenance and repairs of Class I off-street bicycle facilities only. RCTC Policies 1. The SB 821 Call for Projects will occur on a biennial basis, with a release date of the first Monday of every other February and a close date of the last Thursday of every other April, beginning in 2015. 2. If a project cannot be fully funded, RCTC may recommend partial funding for award. 3. Agencies awarded funds will not be reimbursed for any project cost overruns. 4. Agencies being awarded an allocation will be reimbursed in arrears only upon submitting adequate proof of satisfactory project completion, including but not limited to the claim form for the fiscal year in which the project was awarded, copies of paid invoices, and photographs of the completed project. 5. The allocated amount represents the maximum amount eligible for reimbursement. For projects completed under the allocated amount, the agency 290 Attachment 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ARTICLE 3 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM ADOPTED POLICIES will be reimbursed at the matching ratio in effect at the time of project selection and approval. 6. An agency will have twenty-four (24) months from the time of the allocation to complete the project. There will be no time extensions granted unless the reason for the delay can be demonstrated. Where substantial progress or a compelling reason for delay can be shown, the agency may be granted administrative extensions in twelve-month increments at the discretion of the Executive Director. 7. Any programmed and unused Article 3 Program funds will be forfeited unless that agency can a) utilize the unused funds to complete projects that are the same or similar in scope and/or are contiguous to the approved project or b) apply the funds to a project previously submitted under an Article 3 call for projects and approved by the Commission, subject to Executive Director approval. 8. Design and construction of facilities must conform to the general design criteria for non -motorized facilities as outlined in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. 9. Temporary facilities, projects in the bid process, or projects that are under construction will not be funded. 10. The SB 821 evaluation committee will be comprised of a minimum of five evaluators representing a wide range of interests; such as: accessibility, bicycling, Coachella Valley, public transit, and the region. Staff, consultants, and other representatives from agencies submitting project proposals will not be eligible to participate on the evaluation committee that year. 11. Following each call, staff will monitor the equity of allocations to Coachella Valley versus Western Riverside County; the allocation should be relative to what the Coachella Valley's share would have been if distributed on a per capita basis (the percentage of funds applied for should also be taken into consideration). If the allocation is often found to be inequitable to the Coachella Valley, staff will recommend adoption of a new policy to correct the imbalance. 12. Certain costs at times associated with bicycle/pedestrian projects are not eligible when the benefit provided is not the exclusive use of bicyclists/pedestrians, such as: curb and gutter as part of roadway drainage system, driveway ramps installed across sidewalks, and where roadway design standards require a roadway shoulder width that is at least as wide as a standard bike lane. 291 AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Brenda Ramirez, Staff Analyst Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Metrolink Budget for Fiscal Year 2015/16 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget; and 2) Receive and file a report on the Commission's portion of the FY 2015/16 SCRRA operating and capital budget. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Metrolink is the brand name for the services operated by SCRRA. By virtue of the SCRRA Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), the five member agencies that comprise Metrolink must formally commit to fund their proportionate shares of commuter rail operating and capital costs. Each member agency must approve the budget before adoption of a final budget by the SCRRA Board, no later than June 30, 2015. Service and funding levels are limited by the policy and budget constraints of the member agencies and are negotiated each year. All of the financial information in this staff report is incorporated into the Commission's overall budget; however, in order to comply with the provisions of the JPA, a separate Commission action to adopt the budget is required. The overall subsidy amount that the Commission will provide to SCRRA, including capital and operating subsidies, is $24,038,000. The remainder of this staff report will provide the details that comprise the budget. FY 2014/15 Metrolink Review The following is a review of Metrolink's FY 2014/15 activities: • Additional significant changes in leadership with hiring a new Chief Executive Officer; • Optimized service on the 91 Line by adjusting the train schedule to provide passengers additional options to late afternoon and early evening trips; • Initiated the Fleet Management Plan and Transit Asset Management Plan; Agenda Item 10 292 " Further developed the Positive Train Control (PTC) program with progress being made by the vendor integrator contractor and successfully initiated Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) approved revenue service demonstration on San Gabriel Subdivion in 2015; " Continued successful Friday night Angel Game trains; " Progressed on design of new Tier 4 locomotives to be delivered starting in 2016; and " Completed and opened the Dispatch and Operations Center (DOC) that houses dispatching, PTC back office servers, centralized communication network, and the SCRRA's owned telecommunications networks. FY 2015/16 Looking Forward Looking ahead to FY 2015/16, Metrolink intends to: " Continue and prioritize safety; " Replace ticket vending machines and expand ticketing options with the implementation of mobile/online ticketing; " Continue to improve reliability, on -time performance, and the customer experience by enhancing the rehabilitation program to reduce major failures by retrofitting cars and replacing aging locomotives; " Continue implementing the PTC program systemwide; and " Opening the Perris Valley Line (PVL) extension of the 91 Line that will connect Perris Valley and Riverside, extending the Metrolink route miles by 24 miles. Riverside County Service Impact Proposed for FY 2015 16 Three Metrolink commuter rail lines traverse Riverside County  the Riverside Line, the IEOC Line, and the 91 Line. With the completion and opening of the PVL extension of the 91 Line in late December 2015, the Commission will be funding greater accessibility to train services will be offered to Riverside County residents. The new service will provide passengers three weekday round trips from South Perris to Union Station in downtown Los Angeles. There will also be two reverse peak trains between Los Angeles and the Riverside Downtown Station. This service will have the potential to greatly improve service for all Riverside residents and compliment the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project by providing greater options during the continuation of construction. The service will also introduce the first intra-county commuter train service by providing six bounce back trains between the South Perris Station and the Riverside Downtown Station. Additionally, four new Commission -owned stations will come on line to serve the PVL. Since these stations are owned and operated by the Commission, the operating and maintenance costs, while not included in the SCRRA budget, are included in the Commission's overall budget under the Rail Department. Agenda Item 10 293 Commission's FY 2015/16 Operating Subsidy Obligation Metrolink's overall proposed budget information for the entire system assumes no fare increases with added expenses being passed on directly to the member agencies in the form of higher subsidies. SCRRA is in the process of a fare policy study to identify ways to optimize the fare structure, which may result in a decrease/increase in member subsidies. The SCRRA FY 2015/16 operating budget is $222,935,000. The five county transportation commissions that comprise Metrolink will see their member subsidies increased by a total amount of $15,182,000. The key factors that resulted in the increase were due to reduced fare revenues from the current fiscal year, the Oxnard incident, and the implementation of new service. The Commission is the generator of the new service due to the addition of the new PVL extension. The Commission will have the responsibility of providing $14,555,000 for operations and maintenance of way, which represents a $4,738,000 increase or 46.7 percent over the FY 2014/15 SCRRA budget. This amount includes the implementation of the 91 Line extension service to South Perris and bounce back train services from South Perris to Downtown Riverside, which is approximately $2,875,000. As with past funding, a portion of the operating subsidy will be paid from state Local Transportation Fund revenues allocated for rail operations; however, this year the Commission was eligible to use federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality and Cap and Trade Low Carbon Transit Operating Program funding for operations on PVL as it is a new service. Commission's FY 2015/16 Capital Contribution The Commission's capital rehabilitation and renovation obligation for FY 2015/16 is $9,483,000, which includes $4,627,000 for the rehabilitation and renovation of rail cars. The rehabilitation obligation uses FTA Section 5309 grant funds that will pass through the Commission. Staff executed a $10 million FTA Section 5309 grant application that will provide ongoing funding for the rehabilitation program for this year and several years to come. These funds will be used for various projects including rehabilitation and renovation of rolling stock (cars and locomotives) and track projects, ticket vending machine upgrades, maintenance of way technology, purchasing of new locomotives, and layover facility improvements. Summary Financial Subsidy Impact to Commission The SCRRA-proposed Commission operating subsidy is $14,555,000, which represents only 6.5 percent of the $222,935,000 Metrolink operating budget. The total new capital and rehabilitation project subsidy of $9,483,000 will be funded with FTA Section 5309 and 5337 funds that will pass through the Commission. Agenda Item 10 294 The Commission's total subsidy of $24,038,000 is significant and has seen a steady increase on a year-to-year basis. Future rail expansion projects in Riverside County will likely require similar funding increases and Metrolink will continue to face obligations to upgrade its equipment to meet new emissions reduction requirements and safety needs. It is important to note that purchase options on additional new Tier 4 locomotives are not included in the current budget. SCRRA, Commission staff, and staff from the other member agencies continue to discuss the parameters of these purchases in coordination with the availability of grant funds to support them. In addition, SCRRA's work on the Fare Policy Study may also impact the amount of subsidy required by all member agencies. Staff will provide staff report updates to the Commission on any perceived impacts to the Commission's FY 2015/16 budget throughout the year. Agenda Item 10 295 911/STOZ A� 195pna munowilaw uoissimwo} umiouodsuail Aryno) opium% uoissiww9 uoRopodsuoil lquno3 apsianm _ nom inni I VENTURA COUNTY Palmdale Vincent Glade/Acton° Via Princess° n °V 4\ Santa Clarita a ��`'°o�e �`°-o Newhall c t, \oa ° \e ♦Q aJ‹o �Jo°�J`o \o i� 4\ -`° ,r.. • �,Jo�\ o,:t soo� 0 14. oe PACIFIC OCEAN `r`aa °•�Q°� LAX Airport �1 4iliiimmat• LOS ANGELES SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COUNTY 0 r\ �Q. Q°� J` a��� `°�\�° Q°�, `°`e�o�°���o.��Q°�� %°ter°� °�°�\\�° • In • • lb= • • • • • • • • •� Montebello/Commerce• Industry metrolinktrains.com METROLINI‹ METROUNK ROUTES t0111 Antelope Valley Line t•NI Inland Empire -Orange County Line APIS Orange County Line MOM Riverside Line t•1• San Bernardino Line Ventura County Line MOM 91 Line '• Future Stations Effective September 30, 2013 t9� Station Served by t•1111 Multiple Lines Amtrak Pacific Surfliner Metro Rail/Metro Bus LAX FlyAway Bus San Diego North County Transit District t•� Downtown Pomona Commerce �• Buena © +! Park Placentia Santa Fe Springss Norwalk +• Future Station W. Corona 44.•• Fullerton 411:� '• Anaheim Canyon Anaheim •� Orange •� Santa Ana • Tustin t•=ono E.Ontario Pedley N. Main Corona t Riverside - Hunter Park Future Station Riverside - Downtown Riverside - la Sierra RIVERSIDE COUNTY Moreno Valley/ March Field Future Station Downtown Perris Future Station South Perris Future Station John Wayne© Irvine Airport • Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo San Juan Capistrano 11 •ORANGE IlL COUNTY San Clemente � � • San Clemente Pier �•o •Escondido Limited Se 1SPRINT Service Oceanside SAN DIEGO Solana Beach COUNTY San Diego (uoiillw Z•ZZ$ OuipunJ ill lenuud) luailad Egt ao uoMiva ST$ dn `uoiliiva Siti$ Ap!sqns Dim • 'SiOZ aaquaapaa uiSaq ol aDinaas (end) aun AaileA siaaad . aseami aael oN . (lapnq 9I/SZOZ Ad ueyl ssai uoilliva L$) SIenpe 9-L/STOZ AJ 01 leu. suopafoad anuanaH . (aSueip ou) 0001Zt dNsaapia Allep •end . uoiillua 6ZZ$ lapnq 2uileJaclo . pEopng 6uneiado 9TiSTOZ AA 411A ":": �►'-'= 2015/16 Service Expansion RCTC PERRIS VALLEY LINE • PVL — Extension of six existing 91 Line trains to South Perris — Addition of six new bounce back trains South Perris to Riverside to make 12 trips for that section. — Adds four new stations • Riverside Hunter Park • Moreno Valley/March Field • Downtown Perris • South Perris — New South Perris Layover Facility I o NToWN RIVERSIDE A N .tbonteghERSis RIVIDE HUNTER PARK STATION RIVERSIDE Alessandro Bled. ,A— • Van BuradBlvd. 0 MORENO VALLEY/ \MARCH FIELD STATION Cactus_ An. Markham M. Calaicc Rd. MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE Ramona Expressway PERRIS Orange Ave tdneao3d, San Jacinto Ave. St DOWNTOWN PERRIS STATION SOUTH PERRIS STATION 'V): :A. 6 Locus! Ellis Ave. AtcaStud. anun.uop suie4. siauy D031 1up!u Aep!aj • 0..10W aapao ueld — 9ZOZ palnpaips sanp.owopol maN . slipnvOuppAul :suaaOu03 iepueuH . apvuas atm Z6 paz!wn.clp . 9ZOZ sauil Ile loaluop uie.a. anplsod . •ola 1.a2W Ammoas `aaDUJO u!wPV laRu3 mau saueLD — Ageal dab' `OD MaN - uoReziuelaoaa ADua2e 2uinup.uco . I uoffiiva5$ •xoadde le suo!lels nlunoj apisaanN auiu ail sazipisgns DIM `apisaanN off. anbiun . uoissivauaoo an ol >peq auaoo ipnn spaau 2uipunj ybbDs leuoilippy . 'lnd 2uipnpui suoileaado ao} yHIDs o} uonua S•tZ$ sasodoad lapn8 . " Apisgns aseanui pue saae'. aannoi ol. Apms awl }o peduai pepueug aanlnj . leAwdde aoi loeq auaoD ol paau iunn pue papunj you si aseypand aanlnj v aail anp.ouaopoi . " unnoulun ins si uop.oaaip Aoiiod iind " sluauaapeidaa auweua 2uipuan lapp. ssaappe ol. uonua 817$ }o Apisgns lelideo nnau Dim . spunk yid yI.inn papunj si uoiwua g" t$ jo Apisgns imideo uon.emgegaH Dim . AGENDA ITEM 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislation Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt the following bill position — SB 39 (Pavley) — Oppose. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Congress Poised to Extend MAP-21 Through July Despite pleas from the public and private sectors, and rhetoric from Members of Congress, the federal surface transportation authorization, known as MAP-21 is headed towards a short-term extension to the end of July 2015. Congressional committees with jurisdiction over revenue (House Ways & Means and Senate Finance) continue to struggle with identifying how to pay for a longer -term extension of MAP-21, let alone a six -year full authorization package. A temporary MAP-21 extension accomplishes two things: 1) Avoids a lapse in contract authority for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to reimburse states for transportation projects, which would occur on June 1 if Congress does not act by May 31; and 2) Provides two more months for Congress to identify a pay -for to keep the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) solvent. a) The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) expects the HTF to encounter negative cash balances in the fall of 2015, which could lead to DOT rationing payments to states if Congress does not act. The Senate Environment & Public Works (EPW) Committee announced its intention to markup a full six -year authorization bill in June. Commission staff and lobbyists have made several visits to Washington, D.C. to discuss policy issues primarily relating to goods movement in anticipation that EPW is preparing to draft legislation. EPW leaders, including California Agenda Item 11 296 Senator Barbara Boxer, are pressing to markup a bill to keep the pressure on Congress to avoid more short-term extensions. The Commission will continue to communicate to Congress the need for a sustainable, long-term bill. Amtrak Accidents Shines Spotlight on Rail Safety Issues The tragic derailment of an Amtrak train near Philadelphia reignited focus on the Positive Train Control (PTC) mandate passed by Congress following the Metrolink accident in Chatsworth in 2008. Metrolink made significant progress towards implementing PTC despite meager federal funding to comply with the mandate, and is currently the most advanced rail property in the nation in terms of PTC implementation. The Amtrak accident also renewed attention on the federal insurance cap on damages that can be paid to victims of rail accidents. The cap is set at $200 million. Several Members of Congress are discussing legislation that would raise or abolish the liability cap. Such legislation could have significant financial implications to Metrolink, and therefore the Commission. The Commission will continue coordinate closely with Metrolink on these policy issues. State Update This is a critical point in time in the legislative cycle in Sacramento. Many bills faced the gauntlet of the Appropriations Committee, where bills are often held due to their fiscal impact on the state. Those bills that survived Appropriations Committee are headed to a floor vote in their house of origin and possibly to their second house. Meanwhile, the Legislature is just days away from its deadline to send a FY 2015/16 State Budget to Governor Brown. The Budget Conference Committee is meeting daily. The Commission's legislative advocate in Sacramento, Mark Watts, authored a memo to the Commission on the latest highlights in the Capitol relating to transportation, which is attached. SB 39 (Paviey) Staff Recommendation: Oppose This bill raises the maximum number of green stickers issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which allow those vehicles to travel in high - occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes regardless of the number of occupants. Green stickers also permit plug-in hybrids to use several toll lanes in California at a discounted toll rate (pursuant to the Commission's AB 1721 (Linder), signed by Governor Brown last year; formerly these vehicles could not be charged a toll at all). Prior to last year, the maximum number of green stickers issued was 40,000. Last year, the Legislature increased the number to 70,000. SB 39 raises the cap again to 85,000. This bill represents a 112 percent increase in green stickers over a two-year period. The green sticker program expires on January 1, 2019, (originally it expired on January 1, 2017, however the Legislature extended the sunset date). Agenda Item 11 297 Proponents of the bill, mainly automakers, contend the green stickers are valuable incentives for consumers to purchase low -emission vehicles. In light of the Governor's more aggressive targets for low -emission vehicle sales and greenhouse gas reduction, automakers are under increasing pressure to sell these "green" cars. While the environmentally conscious intentions of this policy are laudable, this particular incentive creates external consequences on other state policy areas and carries financial implications for the Commission. Caltrans' most recent HOV degradation report to the Federal Highway Administration states 59 percent of the state's HOV lanes were degraded in the second half of 2014. Increasing the number of single -occupant vehicles to these lanes will only further decrease the level of service provided by HOV lanes, defeating the purpose of those lanes. The Commission has financial responsibility for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes it will be constructing and operating for at least 50 years, beginning in 2020. The Commission's high credit ratings, and therefore lower interest rates, are dependent upon reliable traffic and revenue estimates. As the Legislature continues to expand the number of vehicles subject to discounted tolls and extends the sunset date of the green and white sticker programs, the Commission becomes exposed to greater financial risk. While the actual number of green stickered cars that will use the 1-15 Express Lanes and take advantage of the discount may be minimal, it is a factor outside the control of the Commission. It is an instance of state actions having direct negative financial consequence on the Commission without compensation. In the interest of protecting the Commission's financial position and the integrity of the state's HOV facilities, staff recommends an oppose position on SB 39. Attachments: 1) Legislative Matrix 2) Legislative Update From Smith, Watts and Company — Dated June 2, 2015 Agenda Item 11 298 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION — May 2015 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 4 (Linder) This bill would bring truck weight fees back to transportation accounts and would prohibit weight fee revenues from being transferred from the State Highway Account to the Transportation Debt Service Fund, the Transportation Bond Direct Payment Account, or any other fund or account for the purpose of payment of the debt service on transportation general obligation bonds, and would also prohibit loans of weight fee revenues to the General Fund. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. (April 9). SUPPORT 3/11/15 AB 194 (Frazier) This bill provides a uniform, less -political process for tolling projects to be reviewed and approved by the state. Today, each tolling project must be approved via a bill in the Legislature. AB 194 provides the California Transportation Commission (CTC) with the authority to review and approve tolling projects, subject to specified conditions that provide for public transparency and collaboration between state and regional governments. The most important aspect of this bill is it rests decision -making authority over tolling projects with the governmental entity financially responsible for the project. The bill is sponsored by the Self -Help Counties Coalition, of which the Commission is a member. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. (April29). SUPPORT 3/11/15 AB 218 (Melendez) This bill allows for the relinquishment from state to local control of State Route 74 in the area between the cities of Lake Elsinore and Perris. This bill is sponsored by the county of Riverside and is championed by First District Supervisor and Commissioner Kevin Jeffries. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file. (April 15). SUPPORT 3/11/15 AB 914 (Brown) AB 914 authorizes San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to implement tolling on Interstate 10 and Interstate 15 within the County of San Bernardino. The bill contains language that requires cooperative agreements between SANBAG and the Commission prior to construction commencing on SANBAG's I-15 project. Re -referred to Com. on APPR. (April 30). SUPPORT 4/08/15 AB 1171 (Linder) This bill authorizes the widespread use of an alternative contracting method known as construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) for projects not on the state highway system. Like design -build, CM/GC offers a streamlined private sector risk -transfer in project delivery that is capable of saving time and money on complex transportation projects. In short, CM/GC allows a project sponsor (such as the Commission) to enter into a preconstruction contract with a private entity to provide services that assist in preparing a design and schedule for the project, while reserving the option to allow that contractor to bid on the actual construction of the project. From committee: Do pass and re -refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re -referred to Com. on APPR. (April 28). SUPPORT 4/08/15 299 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption SB 321 (Beall) This bill allows the BOE to adjust the price -based excise tax using a five-year forecast period instead of just a one-year period, thereby reducing the impact of short-term disruptions in fuel prices. SB 321 also extends the revenue -neutrality requirement to cover a three-year period instead of just one year, offering another opportunity for the BOE to smooth -out dramatic revenue swings. Finally, the bill allows the BOE to adjust the price -based excise tax every quarter, rather than once per year. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. (May 4). SUPPORT 3/11/15 300 ATTACHMENT 2 Smith, Watts & Company Consulting and Governmental Relations June 2, 2015 MEMORANDUM To: Aaron Hake From: Mark Watts Subject: Legislative Update Transportation Funding_Legislation Governor Brown noted in his January State Budget announcement, that the annual maintenance and repair needs on the state's highway system are significantly more than can be funded within existing resources, and identified a current gap in the SHOPP of $6 billion annually. He further stated that the state must consider other funding options to provide for the long-term sustainability of the state's core highway system. Calling on the legislature to act, the Governor stated that the solution must address the deferred maintenance needs of the highway system, key freight corridor investments, and include an ongoing pay-as-you-go funding structure that aligns funding with use of the system. In response, both houses have initiated legislative action to address state and local roadway and preservation repair needs. SB 16 (Beall) reflects a new approach to transportation funding mixing several revenues sources to spread the impact among motorists while the Speaker of the Assembly put forth a concept of a road fee to serve as a basis for finding necessary highway preservation. The following summarizes briefly the key legislative efforts to address new transportation resources. SB 16 (Beall) This is Senator Beall's major effort to increase transportation resources through a variety of revenue sources, recapture truck weight fees, and require early repayment of about $1 billion outstanding loans, to be distributed for state and local roads repair and maintenance. When adopted, it would generate $3-4 billion annually over the next five years. SB 16 has passed two committees and is on the Senate floor pending consideration; although the deadline to move bills out of the Senate is June 5th this bill has an urgency clause which has the effect of waiting the deadline period. 925 L Street, Suite 220 . Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 446-5508 . Fax: (916) 446-1499 301 Assembly Proposal Although the Speaker and Assembly Transportation Chair, Jim Frazier, have continued to work on the approach outlined earlier in the year, the Assembly approach is not yet in legislative form. It is anticipated that following the enactment of the FY 2015-16 State Budget Act that the Assembly will come forward with a more complete package. SB 321 (Beall) This measure would immediately lessen the 2015 gas tax excise rate reduction adopted by the Board of Equalization (BOE) by using an extended timeframe over which the price based tax estimates are to be used for calculating the annual fuel tax adjustment. The bill was approved by the Senate, 40-0 on June 1st The transportation industry is seeking to move the bill to be part of the state budget process so it can become effective immediately along with the budget and result in net, higher gas tax revenues in 2015. AB 194 (Frazier) This bill has emerged as the key bill to address state tolling and high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. Current authority for tolling and HOT projects essentially expired and this bill extends indefinitely the authority for the CTC to grant to Caltrans and regional transportation agencies authority to develop and operate HOT Lanes. The administration also had a proposal they wanted to pursue as an adjunct to the state budget, in the from of a budget trailer bill;; however, the budget committees elected to hold that proposal in favor of a bill, such as AB 194, that went through policy vetting in the legislature. The measure passed the Assembly Transportation Committee and the Appropriations Committee. AB 194 is pending approval on the Floor. AB 1265 (Peres) Assemblymember Perea is carrying this bill to extend the state's current Public -Private Partnership (P3) law. With the author and Assembly Transportation Committee Chair's leadership, the bill readily passed the Assembly Transportation Committee. The bill was not taken up under the Assembly Appropriations Suspense file and is therefore a 2-year bill. However, this bill is under attack by Caltrans' Professional Engineers in California Government (PECG), who seek to amend the bill to: 1) Overturn the Supreme Court decision that supported the Caltrans approach to P3s; and 2) Mandate that the contractor working under the P3 concessionaire in an agreement use Caltrans forces for construction inspection and other project pre -development work. 2 302 State Budget This week brings to a close the state budget subcommittee work on the Governor's Budget Proposals with the full Budget Committees of both houses scheduled to adopt their own versions of the budget act this week; this will lead to the Budget Conference Committee where the focus will be on reconciling the differences in order to present the Governor a final proposed state budget act for his consideration and approval by June 15. Overview For the budget year, the Assembly version of the budget includes $117.9 billion in General Fund Expenditures and $119.7 billion of General Fund Revenues while the Senate committee's version of the budget includes total General Fund expenditures of $117.5 billion for FY 2015-16. The Senate committee's version of the budget provides for $5.6 billion in general reserves. The Assembly version of the budget provides $5.3 billion in total reserves. This includes: • $4.2 billion in the Prop 2 Rainy Day Fund. • $1.1 billion in the regular Budget Reserve. This results in the State's largest budget reserve in the last 30 years in both total fund and as a percentage of overall General Fund Spending. Transportation Budget Items The budget committees approved the Administration's key proposals to increase funding transportation projects and staff to deliver these projects at the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Other important proposals adopted include: • Cap -and -Trade Proposal. The budget committees approved the Administration's cap - and -trade proposal for transportation -related programs as follows: 1) $500 million for the high-speed rail system; 2) $400 transit -oriented development (sustainable communities); 3) $265 million for the transit and intercity rail capital program; and 4) $100 million for low carbon transit operations. Additionally, the Senate approved a $500 million appropriation for a variety of Cap and Trade program purposes that are listed on the attachment. • Transportation congestion relief program repayment status. The Assembly adopted a proposal to reclassify Pre -Prop 42 loans as general fund debt, which is an important first step to qualifying TCRP projects for repayment from the proposition to RAINY DAY fund. • Caltrans Capital Outlay Support (COS) and Project Initiation Document (PID) Program Funding. The subcommittees approved a proposal to reduce the Caltrans budget by 3 303 $25.2 million and 178 full-time equivalents (FTE) for the COS program from the FY 2015-16 Governor's budget, for a total of 9,697 FTEs and $1.7 billion in costs. The committee also approved the Governor's budget request for 362 positions and $53.8 million to develop about 600 PIDS in 2015-16. • Road Usage Charge (RUC) Pilot Program. Approved $11.9 million for the implementation of a RUC pilot program, as required by SB 1077 (DeSaulnier), Chapter 835, Statutes of 2014. The approved funding provides for six state positions and $10.1 million for consultants to develop, conduct and evaluate the pilot program and provide the results to the Legislature by June 2017. • Additional Funding for State -Supported AMTRAK Routes. The committee provided an additional $7.6 million to fund the operating expenses of the state -supported AMTRAK routes —Capitol Corridor, San Joaquin, and Surfliner. This increase also funds additional train service on the San Joaquin Intercity Rail route. 4 304 Senate Cap -and -Trade Expenditure Plan The Senate's $2.7 billion cap -and -trade expenditure plan approves much of the Administration's expenditure plan with modifications to better ensure the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Approves the Governor's proposals for the following programs with minimal or no changes: • $500 million for High -Speed Rail. • $400 million for Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program and the addition of a focus on energy and water -efficient housing and commits some of the funding in this program for dedicated farmlands. • $265 million for Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program. • $100 million for Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. • $350 million for Low Carbon Transportation with the addition of alternative fuels, such as biofuels, biomethane, and others, as an eligible use of these funds. • $140 million for Energy Efficiency Upgrades and Weatherization and broadens the use to low- income individuals and communities. • $40 million for Energy Efficiency for Public Buildings and expands to all public buildings (state and local). • $65 million for Wetlands and Watershed Restoration. • $92 million for Urban Forestry and Forest Health (moves program to the Wildlife Conservation Board) and expands projects to include mountain meadows, estuaries, coastal watersheds, and biomass. • $60 million Renewal Energy and Efficiency Projects at UC and CSU. • $30 million Rebates for Appliances. Makes substantive improvements to the following programs: • $50 million for Agricultural Energy and Operational Efficiency. Senate plan increases funding by $25 million and places an emphasis on sequestration. • $10 million for Waste Diversion at CalRecycle. • $105 million for Water and Energy Efficiency and Technology. Senate plan combines two of the Governor's programs and increases total funding by $15 million. • Eliminates the Healthy Soils Program ($20 million). Adds new programs: • $500 million for a Local Climate Action/Disproportionately Affected Communities Program. • $25 million for a Green Bank to provide initial financing for energy efficiency projects. 5 305 AGENDA ITEM 12 URGENCY ITEM RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Bridge Loan From the Local Transportation Fund to SunLine Transit Agency STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the disbursement of $3 million in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds to the SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) as a bridge loan due to the United States Department of Labor suspension of federal Section 5307 funds. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2012, Governor Brown signed statewide pension reform legislation, Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), that became effective January 1, 2013. Implementation of PEPRA, however, has been contested by transit operator and mechanic unions as well as the United States Department of Labor (DOL) as infringing on the collective bargaining rights of unionized workers. The DOL made its opposition to PEPRA known by suspending approval of federal formula grant funds. Without DOL approval of the formula grant funds, transit operators cannot access these funds, which are necessary to ensure continued service delivery at existing levels. DISCUSSION: This is not a unique situation to Riverside County as transit operators throughout California all face an impending cutback or stoppage of transit operations due to their inability to access federal formula grant funds. Local agencies across the state including Commission staff made it clear that delays in federal transit funding will result in layoffs, deferrals of preventive maintenance, delays in planned service expansions and capital improvements, and service cuts. Staff has been in regular contact with Riverside County transit operators affected by the grant suspension and is working collaboratively to develop contingencies in order to deal with the lack of federal funding. One contingency plan provides for interim bridge loans for the current Fiscal Year 2014/15 and the next FY 2015/16 from LTF reserve funds as the most viable way to protect transit services while the court case surrounding PEPRA is decided. The Commission's use of LTF reserves for bridge loans could protect existing service levels without endangering the ability of the operators to prudently invest in service enhancement and expansion. Given that disbursement of these funds would be in the form of a loan, the Commission and its operating partners expect the federal funds will eventually become available. As such, it is also expected that upon receipt of federal funds, the transit operators who have been provided with relief in the form of the loans would promptly repay the Commission. Accordingly, such repayments would then be deposited back into the LTF reserves. It had been staff's intent to more fully present this plan during the transit allocation item to be presented at its July Commission meeting. However, on June 9 SunLine advised Commission staff that, after working with the DOL over the past several weeks, there would be no immediate resolution to its share of the suspended funds and SunLine would not be able to sustain operations through the end of FY 2014/15. SunLine further stated that receipt of the bridge loan after the July 8 Commission meeting may negatively impact its operations. SunLine's urgent request to staff for immediate operating assistance is attached. Staff recommends the Commission approve the disbursement of $3 million in LTF funds to SunLine as a bridge loan, which shall be repaid to the Commission immediately upon SunLine's receipt of federal funds. Staff also intends to bring additional discussion of this issue to the July Commission meeting for further action as it relates to Riverside County transit operators that rely on federal funds for operating and capital assistance. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2014/15 Amount: $3,000,000 Source of Funds: LTF funds as a bridge loan Budget Adjustment: N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 601 12301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \ljtabdailAki Date: 06/09/15 Attachment: SunLine's Letter Dated June 9, 2015 URGENCY ITEM