Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout07 July 13, 2016 CommissionNM Mom Riverside County Trargoriatian {nmmission MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, July 13, 2016 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside drW, COMMISSIONERS eet Chair — Scott Matas Vice Chair — John F. Tavaglione Second Vice Chair — Dana Reed COMM-COMM-00059 Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside Chuck Washington, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Deborah Franklin / Art Welch, City of Banning Lloyd White / Mike Lara, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Tim Wade, City of Blythe Ella Zanowic / Joyce McIntire, City of Calimesa Dawn Haggerty / Jordan Ehrenkranz, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Shelley Kaplan, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez / To Be Appointed, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Randy Fox, City of Corona Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / Clint Lorimore, City of Eastvale Linda Krupa / Paul Raver, City of Hemet Dana Reed / Douglas Hanson, City of Indian Wells Michael Wilson / Glenn Miller, City of Indio Frank Johnston / Brian Berkson, City of Jurupa Valley Robert Radi / To Be Appointed, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Scott Mann / John Denver, City of Menifee Yxstian Gutierrez / Jesse Molina, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Jonathan Ingram, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Ted Hoffman, City of Norco Jan Harnik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat / Geoffrey Kors, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Rita Rogers, City of Perris Ted Weill / To Be Appointed, City of Rancho Mirage Rusty Bailey / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Crystal Ruiz, City of San Jacinto Michael S. Naggar / Michael McCracken, City of Temecula Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar John Bulinski, Director, Governor's Appointee Caltrans District 8 Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 7:27 AM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Jennifer Harmon Subject: RCTC: July Commission Agenda - 07.13.2016 Importance: High Good morning Commissioners: The July Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 13, 2016 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/iuly-13-2016.original.pdf Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. yerly Deputy Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951)787-7141 1 Tara Byerly From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 7:29 AM To: Tara Byerly Subject: RCTC: July Commission Agenda - 07.13.2016 Importance: High Good morning Commission Alternates: The July Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 13, 2016 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/iuly-13-2016.original.pdf Respectfully, Tara S. yerly Deputy Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951)787-7141 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, July 13, 2016 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JUNE 8, 2016 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 13, 2016 Page 2 6. PUBLIC HEARING — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT SERVICES FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 1 1) Conduct a public hearing at its July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2016/17 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); 5) Adopt Resolution No. 16-014, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS — The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR — All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8A. FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 SALARY SCHEDULE Page 21 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt the revised Fiscal Year 2016/17 Salary Schedule. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 13, 2016 Page 3 8B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVAL OF THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT Page 24 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 16-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Considering a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project, Making Responsible Agency Findings, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Approving the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project"; and 2) Approve the 1-15 Express Lanes project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 8C. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT THROUGH A DESIGN -BUILD CONTRACT Overview This item is for the Commission to Page 60 1) Authorize staff, subject to approval by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), to issue Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 16-31-057-00 and future addenda to design and construct the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project through a design - build (DB) contract; 2) Approve the selection criteria for the selection of the apparent best value (ABV) proposer; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to select the top -ranked ABV proposer for DB services, based on the criteria identified in the RFP and any addenda, and to conduct subsequent limited negotiations; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director to pay, to the shortlisted DB proposers that meet the RFP criteria, a stipend of $275,000 per proposer or a total amount not to exceed $825,000 for all shortlisted proposers after Commission award of the DB contract. 8D. 2016 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 67 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2016 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 13, 2016 Page 4 8E. AGREEMENT NO. 16-31-102-00 WITH COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO FUND A PROJECT STUDY REPORT EQUIVALENT DOCUMENT FOR THE ETHANAC ROAD/STATE ROUTE 74/NICHOLS ROAD CORRIDOR Page106 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 16-31-102-00 with the county of Riverside (County) for $2 million of 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridors program funds for the preparation of a project study report equivalent (PSRE) document for the Ethanac Road/State Route 74/Nichols Road corridor, for which the County will serve as lead agency; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Approve an increase of $1 million in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budgeted expenditures for preliminary engineering. 8F. FISCAL YEARS 2017-21 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Page131 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the Fiscal Years 2017-21 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted. 8G. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITY OF BLYTHE FOR TRADING 2012 AND 2014 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS FOR 2009 MEASURE A WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY HIGHWAY FUNDS Page133 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 07-71-028-01, Amendment No. 1 to MOU No. 07-71-028-00, with the city of Blythe (Blythe) to trade Palo Verde Valley 2012 and 2014 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds with 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds in the amount of $1,106,410; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the MOU on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Approve an increase of $1,106,410 in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budgeted expenditures for construction. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 13, 2016 Page 5 8H. STATE ROUTE 71/91 INTERCHANGE — CITY OF CORONA UTILITY AGREEMENT Page 138 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 16-31-070-00 with the city of Corona (Corona) for the relocation of a water line in the revised amount of $588,825, plus a revised contingency amount of $150,207, for a revised total amount not to exceed $736,032; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Approve an increase of $523,300 in Fiscal Year 2016/17 budgeted federal revenues and right of way expenditures for utility relocation costs. 81. ANNUAL FUNDING MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 146 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 16-25-106-00 with the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) for the Commission's funding commitment related to the Fiscal Year 2016/17 SCRRA budget for a total amount not to exceed $19,524,000; 2) Approve MOU No. 16-25-107-00 with SCRRA for reimbursement of security guard services at Riverside County layover facilities for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $250,000 for FY 2016/17; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to approve the final form and execute the MOUs; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute amendments to MOU No. 16-25-107-00 related to revised compensation amounts in subsequent years. 8J. AMENDMENT FOR ON -CALL RAIL OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 174 1) Approve an increase of $2 million for the following agreements for the continued support of on -call rail operations services for a revised amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $4 million and amendments to extend the Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 13, 2016 Page 6 agreements for an additional two-year term; a) Agreement No. 12-25-022-03, Amendment No. No. 12-25-022-00, with HDR Engineering, Inc.(HDR); b) Agreement No. 12-25-035-04, Amendment No. 4 No. 12-25-035-00, with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Brinckerhoff); and c) Agreement No. 12-25-036-04, Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 12-25-036-00, with STV Incorporated (STV); 2) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to the consultants under the terms of the agreements; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 8K. AMENDMENT FOR ON -CALL STATION REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE Overview 3 to Agreement to Agreement Inc. (Parsons Page 177 This item is for the Commission to approve an increase of $850,000 for the following agreements for continued support of on -call station repair and maintenance services for a total amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $2.1 million: a) b) Agreement No. 12-24-085-00 with Process Cellular Inc. (ProCell); and Agreement No. 12-24-116-00 with Braughton Construction Co Inc. (Braughton). 8L. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION — ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 Page 179 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Riverside County Public Transportation — Annual Countywide Performance Report (Countywide Report) for Fiscal Year 2014/15. 8M. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt the following bill position — AB 2452 (Gatto) — Oppose. Page 227 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 13, 2016 Page 7 9. STATUS OF INTEREST RATE SWAPS INTEGRATED WITH 2O09 VARIABLE RATE DEMAND BONDS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 238 1) Receive and file a status report on the two interest rate swaps that are integrated with the 2009 Sales Tax Variable Rate Demand Bonds (2009 Bonds); 2) Direct staff to continue to evaluate financing options related to interest rate swaps integrated with the 2009 Bonds; and 3) Approve an increase of $11,100,000 in FY 2016/17 Budget expenditures related to debt service and professional costs. 10. PROGRAMMING OF ADDITIONAL FEDERAL FUNDS FOR UNION PACIFIC PACHAPPA UNDERPASS PROJECT AND 2016 EARMARK REPURPOSING FUNDS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 243 1) Rescind previous programming for the Pachappa Underpass project (Pachappa project) including up to $13 million of federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds and 1989 Measure A Western Riverside County highway funds; 2) Approve programming $847,552 of available 2016 federal earmark repurposing funds from prior Commission projects and additional federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) and/or CMAQ funds to the Pachappa project to complete the State Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane project for a total amount of $12 million; 3) Approve programming available federal repurposed earmark balances that cannot be used by other local agencies to the Pachappa project in place of federal STP and/or CMAQ funds so funds stay within Riverside County and do not lapse; 4) Approve an increase of $2,261,700 in Fiscal Year 2016/17 Budget federal revenues; and 5) Direct staff to continue working with the cities and county to review eligible projects for repurposing and provide assistance with the federal repurposing process. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 13, 2016 Page 8 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 12. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. 13. CLOSED SESSION 13A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Case No(s). RIC 10016058, RIC 1511130, RIC 1602030, and RIC 1607468 14. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting of the Commission is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Board Room, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL J U LY 13, 2016 County of Riverside, District I County of Riverside, District II County of Riverside, District III County of Riverside, District IV County of Riverside, District V City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Eastvale City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of Jurupa Valley City of La Qu i nta City of Lake Elsinore City of Menifee City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta Present O 1: J7 :;11,,,. 0 jal,... City of Norco l.17K. 0 City of Palm Desert 0 City of Palm Springs 0 City of Perris ,2"'- 0 City of Rancho Mirage )2r 0 City of Riverside :17715_,. ,�City of San Jacinto0 City of Temecula 2r 0 City of Wildomar ,er Absent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J:3 0 0 .7r 0 0 0,/ 02 0 0 0 0 0 Governor's Appointee, Ca!trans District 8 0 AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, June 8, 2016 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Scott Matas at 9:32 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Dana Reed led the Commission in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley Geoffrey Kors Rusty Bailey Andrew Kotyuk Ben Benoit Linda Krupa John J. Benoit Bob Magee Daryl Busch Scott Matas Joseph DeConinck Michael Naggar John Denver Stephen Pusey Deborah Franklin Robert Radi Rick Gibbs Dana Reed Dawn Haggerty Adam Rush Berwin Hanna Karen Spiegel Jan Harnik Ted Weill Steven Hernandez Lloyd White Kevin Jeffries Michael Wilson Frank Johnston Ella Zanowic Yxstian Gutierrez Greg Pettis John F. Tavaglione* Chuck Washington *Commissioner John Tavaglione assigned his proxy vote to Commissioner John Benoit. A letter was filed with the Clerk of the Board. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to speak from the public. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MAY 11, 2016 M/S/C (Radi/Johnston) to approve the May 11, 2016 minutes as submitted. Abstain: Hanna and Kor 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Chair Matas announced the continuation of the public hearing opened at the May 11 meeting. Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance, presented the proposed Budget for FY 2016/17 and discussed the following areas: • Budget adjustments and summary; • Funding sources and comparison; • Summary of uses; • Management services; • Regional programs; • Toll operations; • Capital project development and delivery expenditures/uses; • Capital projects and operations expenditures and highlights; • Functional uses breakdown; and • Measure A management services; and • Next steps. At this time, Chair Matas asked if there were any comments from the public. No comments were received. Chair Matas closed the public hearing. M/S/C (Gibbs/Spiegel) to: 1) Approve the salary schedule effective July 7, 2016, located in Appendix B of the proposed budget; and 2) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2016/17. Commissioner Reed commended staff for an excellent and thorough presentation, noting there were no questions from Commissioners. Anne Mayer concurred with Commissioner Reed's comment and expressed appreciation to Michele Cisneros, Theresia Trevino, and staff. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 3 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Karen Spiegel requested Agenda Item 8F, "Riverside 91 Express Lanes Ordinance for Enforcement of Toll Violations", and Agenda Item 81, "Resolution No. 16-011 Regarding the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Toll Policy Goals and Toll Policies", be pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. M/S/C (Jeffries/Harnik) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. 8A. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Adopt Resolution No. 16-013, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit", for Fiscal Year 2016/17. 88. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2016. 8C. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. 8D. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4, 2015 (4Q 2015). 8E. RATIFY EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION ZONE ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM AND OTHER STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1) Ratify the scope of state furnished materials (SFM) defined in the design -build cooperative Agreement No. 12-31-070-00, as amended, between the Commission and Caltrans for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) to include Construction Zone Enhanced Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 4 Enforcement Program (COZEEP) and other SFM in the amount of $4.3 million, plus a contingency amount of $400,000, for a total amount not to exceed $4.7 million; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for the project. 8G. SECTION 214 FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT 1) Approve Agreement No. 16-31-096-00 between Riverside County Transportation Commission and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District, for Section 214 funding agreement in the amount of $15,000, plus a contingency amount of $45,000, for a total amount not to exceed $60,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for the project. 8H. AGREEMENT WITH NOSSAMAN LLP FOR ON -CALL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR SERVICES 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-66-028-13, Amendment No. 10 to Agreement No. 06-66-028-00, with Nossaman LLP (Nossaman) for the on -call strategic partnership advisor services by extending the contract term to December 31, 2020, and augmenting the agreement in the amount of $5.7 million, plus a contingency amount of $300,000, for an additional amount of $6 million, and a total amount not to exceed $14,352,935; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for the project. 8J. INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES INVESTMENT GRADE TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STUDY Adopt the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 5 8K. RESOLUTION NO. 16-010 REGARDING THE 2016 TITLE VI PROGRAM REPORT UPDATE, INCLUDING THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN AND LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE PLAN Adopt Resolution No. 16-010, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the 2016 Title VI Program Report Update, Including the Public Participation Plan and Language Assistance Plan", in compliance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements. 8L. CLINTON KEITH ROAD EXTENSION — MULTI FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS UTILIZATION OF PROJECT SAVINGS FOR PHASE III 1) Approve the request by the county of Riverside (County) to utilize $2,717,000 in project savings from the Clinton Keith Road Extension Phase II project (Phase II) for the Clinton Keith Road Extension Phase III project (Phase III); 2) Approve Agreement No. 14-72-099-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14-72-099-00 with the County to reprogram $2,717,000 from Phase II to Phase III and reduce 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial (MARA) funding by $214,047; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 8M. SURPLUS OF REAL PROPERTY 1) Declare as surplus the eight real properties, comprised of 10 Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), adjacent to State Route 74, as described in this agenda item and attached maps; 2) Authorize the Executive Director to notify public agencies and contiguous land owners for seven of the properties, pursuant to Government Code 54220 et.seq, that the properties are available for purchase; and 3) If no response is received from public agencies and contiguous land owners, authorize the Executive Director to offer the surplus property for sale to the public. 8N. FISCAL YEARS 2016/17 — 2018/19 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Approve the Fiscal Years 2016/17 — 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and the Commission's Western Riverside County Rail Program and Coachella Valley Rail Program. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 6 80. FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SUPERVISION 1) Approve Agreement No. 16-45-094-00 with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to provide supervision and operation of the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program in Riverside County in an amount not to exceed $793,181; and 2) Authorize the Chair, or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 8P. AMENDMENT TO FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL AGREEMENT 1) Approve Agreement No. 11-45-053-05, Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 11-45-053-00, with Tri-City Towing, Inc. (Tri-City) to provide Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) services on Beat No. 7 for an additional amount of $60,000, and a total amount not to exceed $1,110,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 8Q. FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE BUSPOOL SUBSIDY FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUESTS 1) Authorize payment of $1,645/month maximum subsidy per buspool for the period July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017, to the existing Riverside, Riverside II, and Mira Loma buspools; and 2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. 9. PROPOSED METROLINK BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Anne Mayer expressed appreciation to Metrolink staff and Board Members for their years of support on the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project and most particularly SCRRA's Chief Executive Officer Art Leahy for his commitment to the safety and needs of the PVL customers. She then welcomed and introduced Art Leahy to discuss SCRRA's FY 2016/17 Budget. Art Leahy expressed appreciation for Ms. Mayer's comments and congratulated the Commission for the opening of the PVL. He then discussed the following areas regarding Metrolink: • Rebuild mode — confront, engage, and solve problems due to past issues with deferral, avoidance, and finances; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 7 • Ridership for Southern California; • First in the nation to implement positive train control (PTC); • Acknowledgements from the Federal Railroad Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board for PTC; • Remote ticketing system; and • Tier 4 locomotive —cleanest diesel, first in the world. He then introduced Elissa Konove, SCRRA Deputy Chief Executive Officer, to present the FY 2016/17 SCRRA Budget. Elissa Konove presented the SCRRA Budget for FY 2016/17, highlighting the following areas: • FY 2016/17 SCRRA Budget Priorities; • Revenue allocation by member agency; • Increase drivers for FY 2016/17 expense budget to adequately fund the materials and equipment; • Expense allocation and subsidy by member agency; • FY 2016/17 rehabilitation and new capital budget; and • Timeline — Next steps. Anne Mayer expressed appreciation for the presentation and stated the information regarding the significant investment and expenditures for PVL are included in the Commission's FY 2016/17 Budget. Also, staff wanted to ensure Commissioners understood some of the specifics of Metrolink's focal points for next year. At this time, Ms. Konove introduced SCRRA's new Chief Financial Officer Ronnie Campbell. M/S/C (Naggar/B. Benoit) to: 1) Adopt the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget, which results in a total operating and capital subsidy of $19,233,000 from the Commission; 2) Support an amendment to the FY 2016/17 SCRRA operating and capital budget in an amount not to exceed $6 million for the expansion of the Riverside Downtown Layover Facility and additional track improvements on the corridor; and 3) Receive and file a report on the Commission's portion of the FY 2016/17 SCRRA operating and capital budget. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 8 10. STATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager, presented an update on state legislative activities, highlighting the following areas: • Appropriations Committee suspense results: o AB 1780 (Medina) — Held; o AB 2014 (Melendez) — Held; o AB 2170 (Frazier) — Pass; o AB 1742 (Nazarian) Held; and • May Revise — Governor's transportation funding proposal remains in budget and new proposal and trailer bill language on federal freight funding for California. In response to Commissioner Dawn Haggerty's question about the progress on the geographic equity for distribution of funds between northern and southern California, Aaron Hake replied it is a concern staff is constantly following. He stated there is the 60/40 split of STIP funds between north and south. Mr. Hake noted it is not always north and south, occasionally it is inland and coastal. At this point, there is little to report until the funding proposal details are released. Commissioner Jan Harnik discussed Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) significant concerns regarding cap -and -trade funding. Commissioner John Benoit discussed the issues with cap -and -trade grant eligibility. Aaron Hake discussed the potential causes of issues with business purchase credits. In response to Anne Mayer's clarification about the Trade Corridor Infrastructure Fund (TCIF) split and how much will come to California from the federal freight program, Aaron Hake replied about $100 million per year. Anne Mayer discussed staff's concerns with the Administration's proposed trailer bill, specifically the proposed 50/50 split. She stated SCAG's Executive Director Hasan Ikhrata is championing an effort to ensure this region receives its fare share for funding. Ms. Mayer explained all of the work being undertaken in Sacramento to advocate for this region is being done in conjunction with the Commission's partners throughout the region as well as the Self -Help Counties Coalition, and Mobility 21. Staff will update the Commission as details are received. At this time Commissioner Naggar left the meeting. M/S/C (Kotyuk/Spiegel) to receive and file an update on state legislation. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 9 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION At this time, Commissioner Marion Ashley left the meeting. 8F. RIVERSIDE 91 EXPRESS LANES ORDINANCE FOR ENFORCEMENT OF TOLL VIOLATIONS In response to Commissioner Spiegel's question if the Commission's ordinance for the toll violations is consistent with Orange County, Jennifer Crosson replied the Commission adopted policies that are in line with the current Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) ordinance. In response to Commissioner Spiegel's clarification the Commission's ordinance for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project will be similiar, Jennifer Crosson concurred. At Commissioner Spiegel's request to explain how these corridors are in line with Los Angeles and San Diego corridors, Ms. Crosson described the two -notice violation process. M/S/C (J. Benoit/Busch) to: 1) Approve the introduction of and introduce Ordinance No. 16-001, "An Ordinance of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing Ordinance No. 16-001 Relating to the Administration of Tolls and the Enforcement of Toll Violations for the Riverside 91 Express Lanes"; and 2) Approve the toll evasion penalties for a violation of Ordinance No. 16-001 in the amounts identified in Schedule A of Ordinance No. 16-001. 81. RESOLUTION NO. 16-011 REGARDING THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES TOLL POLICY GOALS AND TOLL POLICIES At this time, Commissioner Ashley rejoined the meeting. At Commissioner Spiegel's request, Jennifer Crosson discussed the similarities and difference between the two tolled facilities, including goals, policies, pricing structure, and the number of ingresses and egresses. M/S/C (B. Benoit/Spiegel) to adopt Resolution No. 16-011, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding Interstate 15 Express Lanes Toll Policy Goals and Toll Policies". Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 10 At this time, Commissioner Naggar rejoined the meeting. 12. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 12A. Commissioner Lloyd White discussed the financial situation concerning the city of Beaumont. He expressed the new city council recognizes the city, the citizens of Beaumont, and the entire region were victims and its commitment to make amends. Commissioner J. Benoit commended Commissioner White for discussing this matter as it is a difficult statement to make and looks forward to the future for the city of Beaumont. 12B. Commissioner Naggar requested a County I.D. badge to gain access to the County of Riverside Administrative Center without being searched upon each entry. Anne Mayer replied staff will work with the county to obtain I.D. badges for the Commissioners. 12C. Anne Mayer announced: • The 91/Perris Valley Line Metrolink service commenced on Monday, June 6, with a special event on June 1 to introduce the PVL to the public; • The rating agencies trip to New York on June 6 and 7, providing the rating agencies with updated information on the Commission's sales tax program as well as the status of 91 Project; and • The retirement of Goods Movement Manager Tanya Love. She expressed the Commission will notice her absence and wish her all the best in her retirement and thanked her for all of her years of service to the Commission and the public. 12D. In response to Commissioner Haggerty's question regarding first and last mile for the PVL, Anne Mayer replied each of the Commission's commuter rail stations have coordinated links including Riverside Transit Agency buses for local trips, Commuter Link Express buses for longer commutes, and a UCR shuttle between the stations and the campus. Staff is also working with the city of Riverside to implement a bike share program. Steve DeBaun, legal counsel, pulled Agenda Item No. 13B from the Closed Session agenda. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 11 13A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Property Owner(s): See Below Item APN(s) RCPN Property Owner(s) 1 305-020-019 1001 State of California Dept. of Transportation 2 305-020-030 1002 Ritchie Brothers Prop Inc. 3 305-050-006 1003 Thuy, Uyen Ngo 4 305-050-029 1005 Franco, Alejandro & Maria G. 5 305-050-035 1006 Cepeda, Marisa 6 305-050-036 1007 Frewing, David W. & Janet L., et.al. 7 305-050-049 1008 State of California Dept. of Transportation 8 305-050-051 1009 Barker Family Trust 9 305-050-055 1010 Barker Family Trust 10 305-050-057 1011 State of California Dept. of Transportation 11 305-060-010 1012 Kim, Chang Z. & Young H., Grant S. 12 305-060-021 1015 Thompson, Victor C. 13 305-060-023 1016 Thompson, Victor C. 14 305-060-025 1017 Thompson, Victor C. 15 305-060-030 1018 State of California Dept. of Transportation 16 305-060-035 1019 Coudures Family Ltd. Partnership 17 305-090-040 1020 Buchko, William S. & John C. 18 305-090-045 1021 Beckner, Mary 19 305-090-046 1022 State of California Dept. of Transportation 20 305-090-055 1023 Coudures Family Ltd. Partnership 21 317-230-034 1024 Ritchie Brothers Prop Inc. 22 317-240-032 1025 Oakmont Perris Harvil Street 23 317-240-034 1026 State of California Dept. of Transportation 24 317-260-029 1027 State of California Dept. of Transportation 25 317-260-030 1028 CLA VAL Co. 26 305-080-088 1029 Bacon, Melton L. & Katherine L. Trust 27 305-080-092 1030 Coreslab Structure, Inc. 28 305-070-003 1031 Coudures Family Ltd. Partnership 29 305-040-017 1032 Pacific Continental Modular Enterprises 30 305-040-036 1033 City of Perris 31 305-040-043 1034 Pacific Continental Modular Enterprises 32 305-040-047 1035 Pacific Continental Modular Enterprises 33 305-040-049 1036 Pacific Continental Modular Enterprises 34 305-040-051 1037 Pacific Continental Modular Enterprises 35 305-040-053 1038 Pacific Continental Modular Enterprises 36 300-020-001 1039 T A INV Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 12 Item APN(s) RCPN Property Owner(s) 37 300-020-007 1040 Cal Walnut Street Real Estate 38 300-020-008 1041 Cal Walnut Street Real Estate 39 300-020-013 1042 Jackson, Robin Z. 40 300-020-014 1043 Leon, Luis & Rosilda 41 300-020-021 1044 Santos, Victor 42 300-020-022 1045 Hall, Richard & Grajales, Myriam 43 300-020-023 1046 Scarpino, Vincent M. & Valerie Jean 44 300-020-024 1047 Torres, Sabina & Avalos, Maria G. 45 300-090-001 1048 Larkins, George J. & Jean Trust 46 300-090-002 1049 Riverside County Flood Control District 47 300-090-007 1050 Perris Land Co. 48 300-090-008 1051 Riverside County Flood Control District 49 300-170-003 1052 Wang, Ching Fu & Hsiao, Hsiang Fen 50 300-170-005 1053 Wang, Tung Hsun & Ying Lang 51 300-170-011 1054 Lennox, Robert C. & Sandra M. 52 300-170-012 1055 Peterson Dev 53 300-170-013 1056 Peterson Dev 54 300-170-014 1057 Peterson Dev 55 300-210-018 1058 Stagliano, Vincert J. & Peggy S. Trust 56 300-210-019 1059 Stagliano, Vincert J. & Peggy S. Trust 57 300-210-020 1060 Smith, Alice Elaine 58 300-210-021 1061 Stevenson, Douglas E. & Becky Leigh 59 300-210-022 1062 Wang, Di 60 307-050-008 1063 McCanna Hills 61 307-070-004 1064 Ranch Haven; Golden Hill Country 62 307-080-008 1065 Ranch Haven; Golden Hill Country 63 307-090-001 1066 Ranch Haven; Golden Hill Country 64 307-410-001 1067 McCanna Hills 65 307-410-002 1068 McCanna Hills 66 300-020-002 1069 Lopez, Francisco & Eva Trust 67 308-130-008 1081 Lauda, Frank S., & Pagliuso, Sandra D. 68 308-130-005 1082 Lauda, Frank S., & Pagliuso, Sandra D. 69 308-140-006 1083 Lauda, Frank S., & Pagliuso, Sandra D. 70 430-120-012 1070 Spyksma, John A. & Yanita J. 71 553-220-023 1071 McAlister Investments, Inc. 72 422-170-001 1072 Shook, Loretta & Greer, Joetta 73 422-220-002 1073 Shook, Loretta & Greer, Joetta 74 422-240-014 1074 R B Ventures 75 422-240-015 1075 R B Ventures 76 423-190-004 1076 R B Ventures Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 8, 2016 Page 13 Item APN(s) RCPN Property Owner(s) 77 423-100-016 1077 Ahome Real Estate 78 422-030-007 422-030-008 1078 Professors Highlanderson Properties Partners, GP. 79 422-040-012 1079 Raceway Properties, GP. 80 422-050-028 422-050-032 1080 Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District There were no announcements from the Closed Session items. 14. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Matas adjourned the meeting at 10:52 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 13, 2016, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Respectfully submitted, 01-xv"-119-(._ Q-Q-1(Y‘f;)(-- Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board AGENDA ITEM 6 PUBLIC HEARING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Transit Services Funding Allocation for Fiscal Year 2016/17 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing at its July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2016/17 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTI P); 5) Adopt Resolution No. 16-014, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its June 8 meeting, the Commission approved the FY 2016/17 — FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; the Commission's Commuter Rail Program; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine). The core components of each agency's SRTP include the operating and capital plans and accompanying budget with cost estimates for each aspect of the plan along with an implementation timeline. The SRTPs also document each operator's system and route performance data, which provide the basis for the Commission's oversight activities to ensure compliance with federal regulations, the Transportation Development Act (TDA), state law, and Commission -adopted policies and guidelines. The annual update is aimed at refining and improving productivity and mobility to ensure sales tax funds and other funding resources are spent in the most efficient and cost effective manner. Throughout the development and execution of the SRTPs, the Commission maintains its immediate focus by providing an integrated network of transit services convenient for county residents to meet the county's identified unmet needs over a three-year time frame. Agenda Item 6 1 In January 2016, the Commission received information on the FY 2016/17 revenue projections, which were subsequently revised in April 2016, in connection with the final budget compilation. The revised revenues reflected an increase of 2.4 percent in LTF and 1.8 percent in Measure A funding compared to the FY 2015/16 revised estimates. The California State Controller's office also released the FY 2016/17 STA preliminary allocation estimates for the region, indicating approximately 19 percent decrease compared to last year's estimate. This year's STA funding allocation for Coachella Valley includes a set aside of 10 percent of STA funds into the Coachella Valley Intercity Rail fund to cover operating expenses related to technical work for the development of the Los Angeles to Coachella Valley corridor in the state rail plan. This set - aside is based on a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), with the split share of the STA funds apportioned to Coachella Valley starting at 5 percent in FY 2014/15, 7 percent in FY 2015/16, and 10 percent in FY 2016/17 and thereafter. The MOU demonstrates both agencies' commitment toward implementing a rail program in the Coachella Valley by using both federal and state funding sources. SRTP Financial and Ridership Overview Approximately $195 million in total funding is required to support the FY 2016/17 operating and capital requests for the provision of transit services in Riverside County. The following table provides an overview of the total operating and capital costs together with projected ridership levels by apportionment area. FY 2016/17 Operating, Capital and Ridership Projections Expense Type Western Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Bus Rail Bus Rail Operating Capital $ 87,068,064 $ 36,950,600 13,714,089 847,586 $ 33,474,111 $ 3,059,395 19,055,873 - $ 1,010,582 164,487 $ 161,562,752 33,782,035 Total (Operating & Capital)* $ 100,782,153 $ 37,798,186 $ 52,529,984 $ 3,059,395 $ 1,175,069 $ 195,344,787 FY 2016/17 Projected Ridership 10,282,435 3,179,392 4,621,406 0 48,299 18,131,532 * Exclusive of LA Metro, OCTA & SANBAG's share and passenger fare revenues for Commuter Rail expenses For the last four years, Riverside County ridership showed a steady increase at an average annual increase of 2 to 3 percent, with peak ridership recorded in FY 2012/13. For FY 2015/16, however, the ridership estimate indicates about 17.8 million passengers in Riverside County, a decrease of 3.5 percent over FY 2014/15, showing a similar downward ridership trend among other transit operators in the region as well as nationwide. Nevertheless, as shown in Attachment 4, the funding plan for FY 2016/17 is forecasted to generate approximately 18.1 million riders, a slight 1.6 percent higher than the projection for FY 2015/16. Agenda Item 6 2 Total operating expenses for next year's transit operations reflect a systemwide increase of 13 percent, however there was a significant decrease of 41 percent in capital expenditures compared to FY 2015/16 funding levels. The rise in operating costs is attributable mainly to full -year start-up operating expenditures and additional bus service connections for the Perris Valley Line service as well as new expenditures for the Coachella Valley rail planning and development. Other drivers of rising operating expenses are expanded service hours to meet public demand as well as increasing pension and other personnel costs. Capital funds programmed in FY 2016/17 are much less than the previous year due to the significant capital funding for vehicle procurements. This includes SunLine's five new hydrogen fuel cell buses funded mainly with a FTA Low and No Emission Vehicle program funds and capital outlay for RTA's new maintenance facility, which is funded mainly with Proposition 1B Public Transportation, Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement (PTMISEA) funds programmed in the previous year. FY 2016/17 Operating and Capital Costs To implement the SRTPs for FY 2016/17, the request is to utilize available funding of approximately $161 million for operating and $34 million for capital purposes. This total does not include the additional rail subsidy and fare subsidy (approximately $37 million) from the other Metrolink partner agencies to leverage the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. The following chart provides an overview of the operating and capital costs by funding source required to support the county's transit operations. Riverside County: FY 2016/17 Operating and Capital Costs TDA & STA Funds), $98,631,366366, 51% Carryover Funds (Sec 5307/5310/530 LCTOP), $1,532,010, 1% Other Revenues ,2% 72,043 Passenger Fares,-Y3,458,877 ,12% ■ Federal Rail Administration grant funds , $2,900,000,1% J Measure A, $20,041,006 , 10% Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5307, 5311, 5311f, 5310, 5339, 5316, 5317) & CMAQ, $32,452,855, 17% J State Prop 18 (Cap+Security), LCTOP & AQIP grant funds, $11,655,640, 6% Agenda Item 6 3 Approximately $165.7 million (85 percent) consists of federal, state, and local funds, including Proposition 1B funds and Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds that are primarily allocated through Commission action. This also includes other discretionary grant funds such as the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and the Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) funds. The remaining $29.7 million (15 percent) of the $195 million total operating and capital costs identified in the chart is funded by the following sources: • $23.5 million — Passenger fares (Bus and Rail) • $ 1.5 million — Carryover funds (Federal Sections 5307, 5310, 5304 planning, and LCTOP) • $ 4.7 million — Miscellaneous other revenues (advertising fees, compressed natural gas sales, general fund contributions, low carbon fuel standard credits, building lease, medical reimbursements, state responsibility area overhead fee, taxi voucher sales, bond proceeds, bus shelter maintenance revenue, and interest income) Transportation Development Act Funding TDA provides funding through two sources, the LTF and STA and is one of the major funding sources for public transit in California. LTF funding is derived from a quarter cent of the statewide general sales tax collected within each county. The State Board of Equalization returns the sales tax revenues to the county of Riverside where it is held until the Commission provides written allocation instructions for disbursement. It is estimated that LTF revenues for transit services for FY 2016/17 will be $79.2 million reflecting a 2.4 percent increase compared to the revised projected amount for FY 2015/16, and is consistent with the revenue projection included in the June 2016 Commission adoption of the FY 2016/17 budget. There is approximately $88.3 million in LTF unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2015/16, resulting in a total available amount of $159.5 million in FY 2016/17, excluding a 10 percent reserve of FY 2016/17 revenues for unforeseen cost increases or emergencies. Of this LTF amount, approximately $91.1 million will be programmed by county transit operators for operating needs. STA funding is derived from sales tax on diesel fuel. Fifty percent of STA funds are allocated according to population, and the other 50 percent is allocated according to the ratio of fare revenues generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. For Riverside County, there is approximately $48.2 million in STA unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2015/16. Additional revenues of $9.7 million are anticipated in FY 2016/17 for a total available amount of $58 million. Approximately $7.5 million of this fund balance will be programmed by county transit operators for various capital projects in FY 2016/17. Now that the annual STA revenues started to slow down again, declining 19 percent in FY 2016/17 compared to the previous year, it is necessary to continue using the current fund reserve conservatively and to spend down existing capital balances prior to requesting additional funds (per Commission policy). Maintaining sufficient reserve funds is imperative to prepare for inevitable needs such as replacing old vehicles and upgrading equipment. Prior to approving Agenda Item 6 4 STA allocations, the Commission must adopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1) as specified in the TDA statutes and regulations. To claim LTF and/or STA funds, the Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in each operator's SRTP. The requested allocations need to be explicit for the projects stated in the approved plans and consistent with the approved SRTPs. Attachment 2 outlines the TDA allocations for FY 2016/17 requested by each operator. Measure A Funding Measure A, the half -cent sales tax transportation initiative in Riverside County, is another primary source of funding for transit. Measure A funds for transit programs in Western County and Coachella Valley provide funding support for specialized transit, intercity bus services, and commuter rail. About 10 percent of the proposed FY 2016/17 expenditures will be covered by Measure A funds. The spending plan for the new fiscal year is outlined below. Measure A Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 2,804,000 RCTC Commuter Rail 11,402,300 SunLine 5,835,696 Total $ 20,041,996 Proposition 1B Funding Proposition 18 bond proceeds fund various transportation programs, including the Proposition 18 PTMISEA program for capital administered by Ca!trans and the California Transit Security Program (Security) managed by the California Office of Emergency Services. The PTMISEA capital program funds replacement equipment, system rehabilitation, capital service improvements or expansion, and bus rapid transit. Under the Proposition 18 Security program, eligible projects include capital projects to protect against security threats or develop a disaster response plan for transit. Riverside County was appropriated approximately $1.8 million in FY 2015/16 Proposition 16 Security funds that are programmed in FY 2016/17. The Proposition 16 PTMISEA funds programmed in FY 2016/17 are FY 2008/09 residual funds that were distributed back to the region. Proposition 16 funds programmed by agencies in FY 2016/17 are as follows: Agenda Item 6 5 Proposition 18 Agency Capital Security City of Banning $ 5,409 $ 19,199 City of Beaumont 5,274 18,734 City of Corona 11,150 79,129 City of Riverside 13,651 48,476 SunLine 117,802 373,551 RCTC Commuter Rail 100,774 355,763 PVVTA 6,321 17,821 Total $ 260,381 $ 912,673 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Funding LCTOP is funded from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund aimed at providing operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve mobility with a priority to serve disadvantaged communities. The programmed LCTOP funding in Riverside County is part of the $75 million appropriation for FY 2015/16, as detailed in the state of California's 2014 Budget Act. Ca!trans is the administering agency for LCTOP, and eligible recipients include transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and transit operators. Allocation shares are determined by formula based on population and ratio of revenue of transit operator's jurisdiction to the total operator revenues in the state. FY 2016/17 LCTOP Requested Funds Agency Amount City of Beaumont $ 63,619 RCTC Commuter Rail 391,049 SunLine 539,373 PVVTA 25,345 Total $ 1,019,386 Air Quality Improvement Program Funding AQIP is a voluntary incentive program administered by the California Air Resources Board to fund clean vehicle and equipment projects, research of biofuels production and the air quality impacts of alternative fuels. In April 2016, SunLine successfully secured a FY 2014/15 AQIP award in the amount of $9,463,200 to implement SunLine's Fuel Cell Buses and Hydrogen Onsite Refueling Station Pilot Commercial Deployment project. The project objective is to accelerate the adoption and commercial deployment of heavy -duty -emission technologies by deploying five fuel cell electric buses supported by a hydrogen refueling station with on -site hydrogen generator using 100 percent renewable energy. This project will provide other fleet operators a one -stop -shop solution to eliminate fuel cell bus adoption barriers caused by lack of available heavy-duty hydrogen refueling stations. Proposed buses will operate on regular Agenda Item 6 6 routes from the communities of Indio to Mecca and Oasis, providing zero emission transportation to disadvantaged communities. Required match funds of $2,750,000 will come from Section 5307 federal funding. FY 2016/17 AQIP Requested Funds Agency Amount SunLine $ 9,463,200 Total $ 9,463,200 Section 5307 Formula Funds FTA Section 5307 is authorized each year via the federal transportation bill in urbanized areas of 50,000 or more. Funds are distributed to regions by urbanized area formula based upon population served and the amount of transit service provided. Under Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), the use of urbanized area (UZA) formula funds has been expanded to include the former Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) program. Additionally transit systems operating 100 or fewer buses in fixed -route service during peak service hours may currently use up to 75 percent of their share of funding for operating. Previously, only urbanized areas with populations below 200,000 were eligible to use the Section 5307 funds for operating. The new program also allows up to 85 percent federal share for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant vehicles for paratransit service. Riverside County consists of four UZAs, namely: • Riverside/San Bernardino; • Hemet/San Jacinto; • Temecula/Murrieta; and • Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs. The Commission must develop and approve a POP for each UZA and conduct a public hearing prior to an operator submitting its Section 5307 grant application to FTA. If the draft POP is not amended through the public hearing process, the POP will become final as presented and will be included in an approved FTIP, which is subsequently forwarded to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for review and processing. Attachment 3 shows the proposed Section 5307 POP for Riverside County. Section 5307 funds requested by operators are shown below: FY 2016/17 Section 5307 Requested Funds Agency Amount City of Riverside $ 623,150 RTA 19,670,270 SunLine 6,000,000 Total $ 26,293,420 Agenda Item 6 7 The actual Section 5307 apportionments for FY 2016/17 will not be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by Congress. The POP was developed at the highest anticipated funding amount based on actual available apportionments for FY 2015/16 to allow the operators to proceed with the grant applications and avoid delays associated with program amendments. Any excess funds will be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year and will be made available to cover future projects. Sections 5310 Funds — Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities The federal Section 5310 grant provides financial assistance to enhance mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities to serve their special needs beyond traditional public transit and ADA complementary paratransit. The program was modified under MAP-21 and offers additional project eligibility categories including Section 5317 (New Freedom or NF) program activities. The expanded eligibility provisions are a result of the consolidation of the Section 5317 program, which was repealed and combined with the Section 5310 program. The program's main focus is funding mobility management activities and capital project expenses, primarily for nonprofit agencies; however, public agencies are eligible to apply for projects if the public agencies certify that no non-profit organizations are readily available to provide the services in the same area. Funds can be used to cover capital and operating expenses. RTA identified the use of Section 5310 funding to cover expenses for its ongoing travel training program. SunLine will use Section 5310 funds to partially fund its taxi voucher program. FY 2016/17 Section 5310 Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 370,000 SunLine 29,606 Total $ 399,606 Section 5311 Formula and Discretionary Funds The federal Section 5311 transit funding provides formula funds to rural or non -urbanized areas in the state. The program is administered by Caltrans, and the majority of these funds are passed through to counties based on population formula. This year's program allocates a total of $891,833 for Riverside County and as in previous years, both RTA and SunLine identified the use of Section 5311 formula funds for operating. Remaining funds are awarded in a statewide discretionary program for rural capital projects and intercity bus programs (Section 53110. Agency FY 2016/17 Section 5311 and 5311(f) Requested Funds Section 5311 Section 5311 (f) RTA $ 550,261 $ - SunLine 341,572 300,000 Total $ 891,833 $ 300,000 Agenda Item 6 8 Section 5316 and 5317 Formula Funds Under the MAP-21 authorization, federal programs Section 5316 JARC and Section 5317 NF funding were merged under the current Section 5307 and 5310 federal programs. Previous FY 2012/13 and FY 2013/14 JARC and NF funding were distributed to public and non-profit agencies through the bi-annual Specialized Transit Universal Call for Projects. As of June 2016, SunLine reported unprogrammed and unexpended funding allotments and is programming the remaining funds to partially cover its Taxi Voucher Program and the Commuter Link 220 operating expenses for FY 2016/17 as follows: Agency Section 5316 (JARC) Section 5317 (NF) SunLine $ 13,093 $ 57,488 Total $ 13,093 $ 57,488 Section 5339 Formula Funds The FTA Section 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities) program provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses/vans, and related equipment and to construct bus -related facilities. Funds can also be used to introduce new technology and safety and security items for transit systems. It is a new formula grant program under MAP-21, replacing the previous Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facilities discretionary program. The program apportions funds to urban areas by population and service factors. This year's program allocates about $4.3 million in formula funds for RTA, city of Riverside and SunLine. FY 2016/17 Section 5339 Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 3,161,767 City of Riverside 191,606 SunLine 942,874 Total $ 4,296,247 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program helps fund regional and local efforts to attain compliance with national air quality standards established in the federal Clean Air Act. These funds are largely spent on transportation control measures and eligible activities include transit improvements, travel demand management strategies, traffic flow improvements, and public fleet conversion to cleaner fuels. These funds are distributed by SCAG to regions which conduct the project selection process according to its Regional Transportation Plan priorities. Program funds can be used for both capital and operating assistance. Agenda Item 6 9 FY 2016/17 Section CMAQ Requested Funds Agency Amount SunLine 201,168 Total $ 201,168 Federal Railroad Administration Grant Funding The Commission in partnership with Ca!trans secured a FRA planning grant in April 2015, to support the seamless continuation of the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor project from Phase 1 to Phase 2. Funding for Phase 1 of the project primarily comes from the Proposition 18 PTMISEA funds, and the FRA grant award of $2.98 million will be used towards Phase 2 of the study to be performed by HDR Engineering, Inc. to complete the environmental report and project service development plan. The planning work is scheduled to begin in July 2016. The result of the study will determine the potential implementation of an intercity passenger rail service between Indio in the Coachella Valley through the San Gorgonio Pass to Los Angeles Union Station in Los Angeles. Local match for the grant will be provided by TDA funds allocated to the Coachella Valley Rail Fund. FY 2016/17 FRA Requested Funds Agency Amount Coachella Valley Rail Fund Total Summary and Fiscal Impact $ 2,900,000 $ 2,900,000 Staff recommendation is to approve the TDA and FTA funds as presented, as it is the Commission's responsibility to allocate and program these funds. If any additional funding revenue becomes available during the budget year, transit operators will prepare the necessary SRTP amendments, as appropriate, to identify new or expanded services and capital projects. Modifications in farebox revenues, other federal and state grants, Measure A funding, or carryover funds may require operators to revise these services to operate within the funding limit available. Funding allocations for LTF and STA are based on the revenue estimates developed for the FY 2016/17 Commission budget. FTA revenues do not pass through the Commission, except for rail, and are therefore not included in the Commission's budget. The FY 2016/17 budget adopted at the June Commission meeting included $87 million in LTF transit operating and $5.6 million in LTF transit capital expenditures, as well as $165,000 in STA transit operating and $21,215,000 in STA transit capital expenditures. Agenda Item 6 10 These budgeted LTF and STA expenditures, which include use of prior year capital allocations, are expected to be funded by FY 2016/17 revenues, as well as available fund balances. Based on the final recommended LTF and STA allocations, a budget adjustment of $4,116,847 is required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes No Yes Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $91,097,619 (LTF) $ 4,116,847 (LTF) $ 7,533,747 (STA) Source of Funds: TDA: LTF and STA Budget Adjustment: No Yes* No GLA No.: LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE Western County Bus Western County Bus 601 62 86101 P2210 $53,764,975, including budget adjustment of $964,975* Western County Rail 241 62 86102 P2201 $3,726,274 Coachella Valley Bus 241 62 86102 P2202 $ 3,533,078 Coachella Valley Rail 601 62 97001 P2213 $17,798,300 Coachella Valley Bus 241 62 97001 P2202 $ 159,395 (Transfer Out) Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2211 $18,651,872, including budget adjustment of $3,151,872* Palo Verde Valley 241 62 86102 P2203 $ 115,000 601 62 86101 P2212 $ 882,472 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-X€4.4&A,34kf Date: 06/14/2016 Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 16-014 2) TDA Allocations (STA and LTF) 3) Section 5307 Program of Projects 4) FY 2016/17 and FY 2015/16 Operating and Capital Requests and Ridership Projections Agenda Item 6 11 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 16-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is designated the regional entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has examined the Short Range Transit Plans and Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to meet the fare revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Federal Transit Act; and WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit assistance fund and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide public transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 99244; and WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers or persons operating under a franchise or license; and WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance with Section 18081.1 of the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251. 12 ATTACHMENT 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 2016/17 as detailed in Attachment 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of July, 2016. Scott Matas, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 13 ATTACHMENT Page 1 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2016/17 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED TOTAL ESTIMATED NON - RECOMMENDED LTF OPERATING LTF CAPITAL LTF TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS FOR OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS COSTS LTF REVENUES FY 2016/17 FY 2016/17 FY 2016/17 City of Banning $ 1,682,001 City of Beaumont 2,549,939 City of Corona 2,473,717 Riverside Special Services 4,364,819 Riverside Transit Agency 75,997,588 $ 69,199 734,008 932,021 694,395 11,284,466 $ 1,751,200 3,283,947 3,405,738 5,059,214 87,282,054 $ 264,099 1,039,259 1,426,765 1,454,218 42,832,837 $ 1,487,101 2,244,688 1,978,973 3,604,996 44,449,217 $ 1,487,101 2,244,688 1,978,973 3,604,996 44,449,217 $ - - - - - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS 87,068,064 13,714,089 100,782,153 47,017,178 53,764,975 53,764,975 - RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) 36,950,600 847,586 37,798,186 19,999,886 17,798,300 17,798,300 - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - RAIL 36,950,600 847,586 37,798,186 19,999,886 17,798,300 17,798,300 - SunLine Transit Agency 33,474,111 19,055,873 52,529,984 33,878,112 18,651,872 18,651,872 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY - BUS 33,474,111 19,055,873 52,529,984 33,878,112 18,651,872 18,651,872 - RCTC's Rail (Coachella) 3,059,395 3,059,395 3,059,395 - - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY - RAIL 3,059,395 - 3,059,395 3,059,395 - - Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 1,010,582 164,487 1,175,069 292,597 882,472 882,472 - ITOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY 1,010,582 164,487 1,175,069 292,597 882,472 882,472 - COUNTYWIDE TOTAL $ 161,562,752 $ 33,782,035 $ 195,344,787 $ 104,247,168 $ 91,097,619 $ 91,097,619 $ - 14 ATTACHMENT Page 2 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2016/17 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA RECOMMENDED STA STA Operating STA Capital CARRY OVER TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS $ FUNDS FOR FY 2016/17 FY 2016/17 FY 2016/17 City of Banning $ City of Beaumont City of Corona Riverside Special Services Riverside Transit Agency - $ 44,591 710,000 - 841,742 - 137,512 - 1,992,429 - $ 44,591 710,000 - 841,742 - 137,512 - 1,992,429 $ - $ 44,591 710,000 - 841,742 - 137,512 - 1,992,429 rTOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS - 3,726,274 - 3,726,274 - 3,726,274 RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) - - - - - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - RAIL - - - - _ - SunLine Transit Agency - 3,533,078 - 3,533,078 - 3,533,078 TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY -BUS - 3,533,078 - 3,533,078 - 3,533,078 RCTC's Rail (Coachella) 159,395 - - 159,395 159,395 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY -RAIL 159,395 - 159,395 159,395 - Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency - 115,000 - 115,000 - 115,000 TOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY - 115,000 - 115,000 - 115,000 COUNTYWID I 159,395 $ 7,374,352 $ - $ 7,533,747 $ 159,395 $ 7,374,352 15 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 4 URBANIZED AREA: Total Apportionment NUMBER RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2016/17 RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO (FY 16/17 Estimate based on 2/9/16 FY15/16 Fed Register & Inter -county Allocation Actuals) Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover (Estimate) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) Sub Area Allocation Riverside, City of Riverside Transit Agency PROGRAM OF PROJECTS Bus Rail Total $ 11,851,266 $ 5,935,385 $ 17,786,651 11,607,737 11,304,005 22,911,742 23,459,003 17,239,390 40,698,393 12,604,621 12,604,621 $ 10,854,382 $ 17,239,390 $ 28,093,772 $ 623,150 11,981,471 TOTAL $ 12,604,621 Riverside, City of 1) Preventive Maintenance 2) Electronic Fare Collection 3) Vehicle Replacement - (1) van 4) Vehicle Replacement - (1) Hybrid/Alt Fuel Auto TOTAL: City of Riverside Riverside Transit Agency 5) Operating Assistance (CommuterLink 212 & 217) 6) Operating Assistance (Extended Fixed Route) 7) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 8) Capital Cost of Contracting 9) Revenue Vehicles - (33) DAR for Replacement 10) Associated Transit Improvements 11) Capital Maintenance Spares 12) Facility Maintenance TOTAL: Riverside Transit Agency GRAND TOTAL Updated: 6/6/2016 Approved: TOTAL AMOUNT FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT $ 400,000 $ 320,000 Capital/Operating SCAG $ 275,500 $ 220,400 Capital SCAG $ 55,000 $ 46,750 Capital SCAG $ 45,000 $ 36,000 Capital SCAG $ 775,500 $ 623,150 $ 892,500 $ 315,000 Operating SCAG 553,500 225,000 Operating SCAG 7,500,000 4,750,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 7,625,000 2,700,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 3,305,895 2,810,011 Capital SCAG 200,000 80,000 Capital SCAG 1,110,065 888,052 Capital SCAG 266,760 213,408 Capital SCAG $ 21,453,720 $ 11,981,471 $ 22,229,220 $ 12,604,621 16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2016/17 URBANIZED AREA: HEMET/SAN JACINTO RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (FY 16/17 Estimate based on 2/9/16 FY 15/16 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment Carryover (estimate) Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) $ 3,201,436 1,648,643 4,850,079 1,965,310 $ 2,884,769 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 2 of 4 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 40,998,251 $ 1,800,000 Operating Caltrans 2) Associated Transit Improvements 200,000 35,000 Capital Caltrans 3) Maintenance/Support Equipment 72,888 58,310 Capital Caltrans 4) Information Systems 90,000 72,000 Capital Caltrans TOTAL: $ 41,361,139 $ 1,965,310 Updated: 6/6/2016 Approved: 17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2016/17 URBANIZED AREA: INDIO/CATHEDRAL CITY/PALM SPRINGS RECIPIENT: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (FY 16/17 Estimate based on 2/9/16 FY 15/16 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment $ 4,503,361 Carryover (Estimate) 1,561,618 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available 6,064,979 Less Current Requests 6,000,000 Balance (Projected) $ 64,979 NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS ATTACHMENT 3 Page 3 of 4 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 31,867,800 $ 1,374,632 Operating SCAG 2) Paratransit Vans - (13) Replacements 1,833,000 719,968 Capital SCAG 3) Expansion Paratransit Vans (2) 282,000 253,800 Capital SCAG 4) Information Technology System (IT) Projects 312,000 249,600 Capital SCAG 5) Replacement Service Vehicles (4 SUV) 240,000 192,000 Capital SCAG Hydrogen Electric Hybrid Fuel Cell Bus and 6) Hydrogen Station 12,213,200 2,750,000 Capital SCAG 7) Expansion Fixed Route Bus (1) 575,000 460,000 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $ 47,323,000 $ 6,000,000 Updated: 6/6/2016 Approved: 18 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 4 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2016/17 URBANIZED AREA: TEMECULA/MURRIETA RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (FY 16/17 Estimate based on 2/9/16 FY 15/16 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment $ 4,620,100 Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover 2,070,606 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available 6,690,706 Less Current Requests 5,723,489 Balance (Projected) $ 967,217 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Capital Cost of Contracting $ 7,625,000 $ 3,000,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 2) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 7,500,000 750,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 3) Revenue Vehicles - (10) COFR Replacement 1,983,400 1,685,890 Capital SCAG 4) Associated Transit Improvements 200,000 45,000 Capital SCAG 5) Capitalized Tire Lease 303,249 242,599 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $ 17,611,649 $ 5,723,489 Updated: 6/6/2016 Approved: 19 ATTACHMENT 4 Comparison of FY 2016/17 & FY 2015/16 Operating & Capital Costs and Ridership Projections OPERATING CAPITAL TOTAL COST RIDERSHIP AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA FY16/17 Budget FY15/16 Budget % Incr/Decr FY16/17 FY15/16 % Incr/Decr FY16/17 FY15/16 % Incr/Decr FY 16/17 Projection FY 15/16 Estimate % Incr/Decr City of Banning $ 1,682,001 $ 1,666,675 0.92% $ 69,199 $ 272,785 -74.63% $ 1,751,200 $ 1,939,460 -9.71% 186,209 134,637 38.30% City of Beaumont 2,549,939 $ 2,266,000 12.53% 734,008 566,840 29.49% 3,283,947 2,832,840 15.92% 242,400 218,737 10.82% City of Corona 2,473,717 $ 2,349,103 5.30% 932,021 601,848 54.86% 3,405,738 2,950,951 15.41% 225,044 217,547 3.45% Riverside Special Services 4,364,819 $ 3,499,600 24.72% 694,395 1,028,972 -32.52% 5,059,214 4,528,572 11.72% 199,000 190,000 4.74% Riverside Transit Agency 75,997,588 $ 69,079,587 10.01% 11,284,466 28,664,645 -60.63% 87,282,054 97,744,232 -10.70% 9,429,782 9,374,372 0.59% Western County: Bus 87,068,064 78,860,965 10.41% 13,714,089 31,135,090 -55.95% 100,782,153 109,996,055 -8.38% 10,282,435 10,135,293 1.45% Western County: Rail 36,950,600 32,105,066 15.09% 847,586 - 37,798,186 32,105,066 17.73% 3,179,392 3,106,075 2.36% WESTERN COUNTY: TOTAL (Bus & Rail) 124,018,664 110,966,031 11.76% 14,561,675 31,135,090 -53.23% 138,580,339 142,101,121 -2.48% 13,461,827 13,241,368 1.66% SunLine Transit Agency (Bus) 33,474,111 30,794,949 8.70% 19,055,873 25,502,013 -25.28% 52,529,984 56,296,962 -6.69% 4,621,406 4,560,371 1.34% Coachella Valley (Rail) 3,059,395 189,439 1514.98% - - 3,059,395 189,439 1514.98% - COACHELLA VALLEY: TOTAL (Bus & Rail) 36,533,506 30,984,388 17.91% 19,055,873 25,502,013 -25.28% 55,589,379 56,486,401 -1.59% 4,621,406 4,560,371 1.34% Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 1,010,582 988,075 2.28% 164,487 341,788 -51.87% 1,175,069 1,329,863 -11.64% 48,299 48,299 0.00% PALO VERDE VALLEY: TOTAL 1,010,582 988,075 2.28% 164,487 341,788 -51.87% 1,175,069 1,329,863 -11.64% 48,299 48,299 0.00% TOTAL: ALL AREAS $ 161,562,752 $ 142,938,494 13.03% $ 33,782,035 $ 56,978,891 -40.71% $ 195,344,787 $ 199,917,385 -2.29% 18,131,532 17,850,038 1.58% Note: FY 2016/17 total cost includes $1,532,010 in 5304/5307/5310/LCTOP carryover funds from prior year. * RTA's FY 15/16 capital budget reflects amended capital amount per FY 15/16 SRTP Amendment approved by the Commission 5/25/16. 20 UMIN= ••...—___ Riverside County Transportation Commission FY 2016/17 Funding Allocation for Riverside County Transit Services July 13, 2016 Short Range Transit Plans FY 2016/17 — FY 2018/19 Riverside County Transportation Commission Sunline Transit Agency Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency RCTC Rail Program [WR -- Commuter Rail] [CV -- Intercity Rail] 2 ��_ f D Riverside County FY 2016/17 Transit Funding Request ROTC Riverside County Transportation {ommission Operating $161 Killion= 83 percent f Capital $34 million= 17 percent r Total Funding Request: $195 million 18.1 million '4"‘'Irr OPERATING & CAPITAL COSTS FY 2016/17 VS. FY 2015/ ROTC MEmon Riverside [aunty Transportation (=mission EXPENSE TYPE FY 2016 17 Bus Rail Total (million) (million) (million) FY 2015/16 � Bus Rail Total (million) (million) (million) CHANGE (FY 17 vs FY 16) OPERATING COST CAPITAL COST TOTAL $121.5 $40.0 $161.5 $ 32.9 $ .9 $ 33.8 $154.4 $40.9 $195.3 $110.6 $ 32.3 $142.9 $ 57.0 - $ 57.0 $167.6 $ 32.3 $199.9 13% -41% -2 TDA (LTF & STA Funds), $98,631,366 , 51% Carryover Funds (Sec 5307/5310/5304 & LCTOP), $1,532,010 , 1% Other Revenues, $4,672,043 , 2% Passenger Fares, $23,458,877 , 12% Federal Rail Administration Funds, $2,900,000 , 1% ``� Riverside (may ironspmlolion Commission Measure A, $20,041,996 , 10% Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5307, 5311, 5311f, 5310, 5339, 5316, 5317) & CMAQ, $32,452,855 , 17% State Prop 1B (Cap+Sec), LCTOP & AQIP grant funds, $11,655,640, 6% r ROTC 2016/17 Transit Revenue Outlook: -- - Riverside [aunty Transportation {omission LT F FY 16/17 =$79 million FY 15/16 =$77 million Measure A Fed 5307 STA s FY 16/17 li.=16.5 million FY 15/16 =$16.3 million FY 15/16 =$30.1 million FY 14/15 =$29.5 million FY 16/17 =$10.8 million FY 15/16 =$13.4 million Staff Recommendations LApprove the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; LApprove the FY 2016/17 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State, J 40� •Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); and Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; • Adopt Resolution No. 16-014, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate STA Funds". AGENDA ITEM 8A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION11 DATE: July 13, 2016 ' TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Executive Committee Beth Gutierrez, Human Resources Administrator THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2016/17 Salary Schedule EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt the revised Fiscal Year 2016/17 Salary Schedule. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its June 8, 2016 meeting, the Commission adopted the FY 2016/17 Salary Schedule. The salary schedule is a part of the budget process and is approved each fiscal year in accordance with California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS). The FY 2016/17 operating and capital budget process began in January 2016, with approval and adoption in June. The approved budget did not include changes to the Commission's organizational structure as no changes were anticipated. As a result of a key staff member's recent announcement of plans to retire in July, executive management evaluated work assignments and staffing needs in order to successfully implement the Commission's strategic initiatives. Organization Change Implementation On June 8, executive management proposed and the Executive Committee approved a reclassification of the existing Government Relations Manager position to an External Affairs Director position. This reclassification reflects the expanded duties currently performed by staff as well as ensuring the classification is appropriately designated at the management team level. In addition, executive management proposed and the Executive Committee reclassified a vacant Capital Projects Manager position to a Legislative Affairs Manager. Given the projected workload in the Capital Program from now through 2020, the reclassification appropriately shifts the position to the area of identified need. Finally, in addition to these reclassifications, executive management proposed and the Executive Committee approved to under fill the classification of Goods Movement Manager at Agenda Item 8A 21 the Senior Management Analyst level. This will provide needed support at the analyst level while at the same time reducing costs and allowing professional development opportunities for staff. These organizational changes effectively align roles and responsibilities and, at the same time, efficiently and prudently utilize existing resources. There is no financial impact, as these reclassifications produce a de minimis savings. Additionally, as a result of these changes, the Commission will not exceed the 1 percent Measure A limitation on administrative salaries and benefits. Based upon the Executive Committee approval and recommendation, the revised FY 2016/17 Salary Schedule is attached for Commission adoption. The revisions include adding an External Affairs Director classification on Range 63 and changing the Government Relations Manager classification on Range 51 to Legislative Affairs Manager. The salary ranges for all classifications remain unchanged from those previously approved. Attachment: FY 2016/17 Salary Schedule Agenda Item 8A 22 Riverside County Transportation Commission Salary Range by Class Title Effective July 13, 2016 Salary Range Class Title Range Minimum (1) Control Point (1) Range Maximum (1) 83 75 71 67 67 65 63 63 63 63 57 53 53 53 53 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 45 45 45 43 43 36 35 33 25 25 25 17 17 17 13 Executive Director Deputy Executive Director Toll Program Director Chief Financial Officer Project Delivery Director Toll Project Manager Planning and Programming Director Multimodal Services Director External Affairs Director Toll Operations Manager Deputy Director of Finance Capital Projects Manager Procurement Manager Right of Way Manager Toll Technology Manager Planning and Programming Manager Commuter and Motorist Assistance Rail Manager Legislative Affairs Manager Transit Manager Goods Movement Manager Public Affairs Manager Facilities Administrator Human Resources Administrator Clerk of the Board Senior Management Analyst Senior Financial Analyst Procurement Analyst Management Analyst Accountant Senior Administrative Assistant Deputy Clerk of the Board Accounting Technician Administrative Assistant Records Technician Accounting Assistant Senior Office Assistant $19,355 $23,754 $26,130 $15,924 $19,543 $21,497 $14,443 $17,726 $19,498 $13,100 $16,078 $17,686 $13,100 $16,078 $17,686 $12,477 $15,312 $16,843 $11,883 $14,583 $16,041 $11,883 $14,583 $16,041 $11,883 $14,583 $16,041 $11,883 $14,583 $16,041 $10,141 $12,446 $13,691 $9,310 $11,426 $12,569 $9,310 $11,426 $12,569 $9,310 $11,426 $12,569 $9,310 $11,426 $12,569 $8,867 $10,882 $11,970 $8,867 $10,882 $11,970 $8,867 $10,882 $11,970 $8,867 $10,882 $11,970 $8,867 $10,882 $11,970 $8,867 $10,882 $11,970 $8,867 $10,882 $11,970 $7,660 $9,400 $10,340 $7,660 $9,400 $10,340 $7,660 $9,400 $10,340 $7,295 $8,953 $9,848 $7,295 $8,953 $9,848 $6,148 $7,545 $8,300 $6,001 $7,365 $8,102 $5,716 $7,015 $7,716 $4,702 $5,771 $6,348 $4,702 $5,771 $6,348 $4,702 $5,771 $6,348 $3,869 $4,748 $5,223 $3,869 $4,748 $5,223 $3,869 $4,748 $5,223 $3,509 $4,306 $4,737 (1) Salary Ranges may be adjusted, as approved, by the Commission 23 AGENDA ITEM 8B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION I DATE: July 13, 2016 I IITO: Riverside County Transportation Commission II FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Lisa DaSilva, Toll Project Manager ITHROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director II SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Certifying the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Approval of the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 16-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Considering a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project, Making Responsible Agency Findings, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Approving the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project"; and 2) Approve the 1-15 Express Lanes project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 1-15 Express Lanes project proposes to design and construct one to two express lanes mostly in the undeveloped median from Cajalco Road in the city of Corona to the State Route 60 interchange in the cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley. Project improvements include the widening of 11 bridges, drainage tie-ins, toll collection system and infrastructure, and soundwalls. DISCUSSION: Under CEQA, an initial study (IS) is prepared to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment. Based on information in the IS, if any impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level, a mitigated negative declaration (MND) is prepared. In 2012, HDR Engineering, Inc. began preparing a MND and the supporting technical studies such as biological, cultural, Native American coordination, visual, noise, hazardous waste, traffic, and air quality to comply with CEQA. The outcome of these studies resulted in a less than significant impact in most areas. In the remaining areas, no additional feasible mitigation Agenda Item 8B measures within the Commission's authority are feasible to reduce the environmental impacts of the project to less than significant levels. These outcomes are in accordance with a MND finding. A combined notice announcing the Notice of Intent and Availability to Adopt a MND was published in the Press Enterprise, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, and La Prensa on July 29 and 31, 2015, informing the public of the proposed project and the start of the 30-day review period. A second notice, Announcement of Public Hearing, was published in the same newspapers on August 5 and 7, 2015, for a public hearing that was held at the Fairfield Inn and Suites in Norco on August 12, 2015. Notices announcing the public hearing were mailed to residents within a 500-foot radius of the project; federal, state, regional, and local agencies and elected officials; interested groups, organizations, and individuals; and utilities and service providers. During the public review and comment period, 64 comments were received and addressed in the final MND, which was issued by Caltrans on May 4, 2016. The final MND is available on the Commission's website. A notice of determination (NOD) and environmental document transmittal was filed by Caltrans with the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research on May 9, 2016. By filing the NOD with the State Clearinghouse, the Caltrans CEQA 30-day challenge period ended on June 8, 2016. No challenges were received. NEXT STEPS: Once the MND is adopted and approved by the Commission, staff will file a NOD with the County Clerk. This starts a 30-day statute of limitations on Commission court challenges to project approval under CEQA. Staff will then continue to move forward with completion of the procurement process for the toll services provider and the design -builder contracts. Future actions to approve the award of the toll services provider contract and the design -build contract is anticipated by early 2017 and spring 2017, respectfully. There is no financial impact for approval of the MND. Attachment: 1) Resolution No. 16-012 2) 1-15 Express Lanes Project IS with MND / Environmental Assessment with Finding of No Significant Impact — http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/i-15-elp-is-with-mnd- environmental-assessment-report.original.pdf - Posted on Commission Website Agenda Item 8B 25 RESOLUTION NO. 16-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CONSIDERING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT, MAKING RESPONSIBLE AGENCY FINDINGS, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND APPROVING THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Commission"), in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans"), intends to construct tolled express lanes on a portion of Interstate 15 ("I-15") within Riverside County to improve existing and future traffic operations and mainline travel times, expand travel choice, increase travel time reliability, and expand the tolled express lane network ("the Project"); and WHEREAS, Caltrans served as lead agency for the environmental review, analysis, and approval of the Project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15000 et seq.) ("CEQA"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, Caltrans prepared and circulated a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study ("MND") for the Project for public comment; and WHEREAS, Caltrans adopted the MND (State Clearinghouse No. 2015071074), adopted an Environmental Commitments Record ("Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program"), and approved the Project on May 4, 2016; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and State CEQA Guidelines section 15096, the Commission has limited obligations as a CEQA responsible agency with regard to the Project; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; NOW, THEREFORE, the Riverside County Transportation Commission does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Compliance with the Environmental Quality Act. In the Commission's limited role as a responsible agency under CEQA, the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the MND and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and all supporting documentation, copies of which are on file at the Commission's office and are incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein. Based on this review, the Commission finds, as to those potential environmental impacts within the Commission's powers and authorities as responsible agency, that the MND contains a complete, objective, and accurate reporting of those potential impacts, that the Project's environmental impacts, including but not limited to traffic, air resources, biology, and greenhouse gas emissions, are less than significant or can be mitigated to less than significant levels, and that these findings reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Commission. Section 2. Findings on Environmental Impacts. In its limited role as a responsible agency under CEQA, the Commission finds that the MND contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project. The Commission further finds that the documents have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The Commission further finds that all environmental impacts of the Project, including but not limited to traffic, air resources, biology, and greenhouse gas emissions, are either insignificant or can be mitigated to a level of insignificance pursuant to the mitigation measures outlined in the MND and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Commission further finds that there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole supporting a fair argument that the Project may result in potentially significant environmental impacts and that any comments received regarding the Project have been examined and determined to not modify the conclusions of the MND or the Commission. The Commission finds that the MND contains a complete, objective, and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project and reflects the independent judgment of the Commission. The Commission further finds that no additional feasible mitigation measures within the Commission's authority are necessary to reduce the environmental impacts of the Project to less than significant levels. Section 3. Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Commission hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Project and approved by Caltrans, a copy of which is included herewith as Exhibit A and is also on file at the Commission's office, and is incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein. Section 4. Approval of the Project. As required by State CEQA Guidelines section 15096 and its role as responsible agency under CEQA, the Commission hereby approves the Proj ect. Section 5. Notice of Determination. The Commission directs staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk's Office within five (5) working days of adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution and the above findings have been based are located at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, California 92501. 27 APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission this 13th day of July, 2016. ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission Scott Matas, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission 28 Exhibit A (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) 29 Appendix D Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project i 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES PRF-1: Trail Detours. During construction, detours will be provided at River Trails Park. Continuous and safe access to other portions of the park and to the opposite sides of the Santa Ana River bridge will be maintained during construction activities. A meeting will be held with the City of Norco regarding the project's temporary impacts to River Trails Park before construction begins. (NEPA/minimization measure) 2-41 Community Impact Assessment (CIA), July 2015 RE/Contractor During construction Implement measure AQ-1 below. 2-271 Air Quality Report (AQR), June 2015 RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Standard Specification 14- 9.02 Implement measure N0I-1 below. 2-413 Noise Study Report (NSR), July 2015 RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Implement measure NOI-2 below. 2-414 NSR RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND COHESION C-1: Prior to construction, a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) will be prepared that will: a) Identify the locations of potential temporary detours, if needed. b) Help to ensure that local access to residences and businesses, as well as bus and emergency service vehicle access, is available during construction of the proposed project. c) Specify timeframes for temporary detours, if needed. d) Specify the process for notifying residents, businesses, emergency services, and the traveling public of the construction period and any required detours.(NEPA/minimization measure) 2-67 CIA Design/Build Contractor Final Design Standard Specification 12- 4.01 Implement measure AQ-1 below. 2-271 Air Quality Report (AQR), June 2015 RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Standard Specification 14- 9.02 Implement measure N0I-1 below. 2-413 Noise Study Report (NSR), July 2015 RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Implement measure NOI-2 below. 2-414 NSR RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-1 30 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE EJ-1: A program will be implemented for the 1-15 Tolled Express Lanes to allow customers to obtain a toll tag and pay toll tag fees in several ways. It is anticipated that this program will be similar to the Orange County Transportation Authority's SR-91 Express Lanes Program. 2-93 IS/EA RCTC Prior to opening year and during operation UTILITIES/EMERGENCY SERVICES11 Implement measure C-1 above. 2-67 CIA RE/Contractor During construction TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION/PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES Implement measure PRF-1 above. 2-41 CIA RE/Contractor During construction Implement measure C-1 above. 2-67 CIA Design/Build Contractor Final Design Standard Specification 12- 4.01 VISUAL/AESTHETICS VIS-1: Construction Lighting. To minimize light spill due to temporary construction activities, light fixtures will be designed to direct light downward to reduce impacts on area residents. All related lighting will meet the appropriate city lighting standards as listed in the Corona, Norco, Eastvale, and County of Riverside General Plan and Zoning requirements. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-171 Visual Impact Assessment (VIA), May 2015 Design Final Design VIS-2: Noise Barriers. The design of all noise barriers will comply with Caltrans standards for noise attenuation, safety requirements, and other pertinent standards. The design of noise barriers requires compliance with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual Standards, and aesthetic treatments will be reviewed and approved by the Caltrans District 8 Landscape Architect. Noise barriers near right of way boundaries will be designed so that access control fencing will not be needed. "Dead" spaces between walls and fences will be avoided to the greatest extent possible. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-171 VIA Design/Landscape Architecture Final Design VIS-3: Architectural Surface Treatment and Detailing. Architectural features, textures, color, and transparency will be used to mitigate the appearance of noise barrier surfaces. Walls will incorporate architectural features such as 1) pilasters and caps to provide shadow lines that will provide relief from monolithic appearance and 2) interesting block patterns to reduce their apparent scale and reduce the potential for graffiti. Noise barriers will be designed to be visually compatible with the surrounding community character and consistent with the SR-91 CIP Project Aesthetics and Landscape Master Plan (PALM), where appropriate. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-172 VIA Design/Landscape Architecture Final Design Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-2 31 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO VIS-4: Structure Aesthetics. Aesthetic treatment for bridge barriers, abutments, and other structure elements will be consistent with the SR-91 CIP PALM. Where bridge structures are widened to the inside, roadway undercrossing slope paving will be constructed as "in -kind" to be consistent with the existing slope treatment. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-172 VIA Design/Landscape Architecture Final Design VIS-5: Landscaping. The design of landscaping will comply with Caltrans standards for aesthetic treatments and will be reviewed by the Caltrans District Landscape Architect. Landscape types will be consistent with the SR- 91 CIP PALM. a) Construction. Upon completion of the project, landscaping will be replaced "in kind" for any vegetation removed for the purposes of project construction. b) Corridor Landscaping. In general, highway landscaping will be consistent with the character of adjacent community landscaping. In communities that are characterized by ornamental landscaping, drought -resistant plants will be consistent with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California guidelines, which promote the use of xeric (adapted to arid conditions) landscaping techniques. The irrigation design and implementation practices will also conform to the water conservation measures established in Assembly Bill 1881, the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act (September 9, 2009). The plant materials will also be durable relative to the air quality of the project area. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-172 VIA Design/Landscape Architecture Final Design VIS-6: Lighting, Signage, and Miscellaneous Highway Hardware. Signage, lighting, and miscellaneous highway feature mitigation designs will be detailed in the final engineering plans. Lighting and signage pedestals on structures will occur at pilasters or be incorporated in other architectural features. Highway lighting and signage will conform to Caltrans design guidelines. Signage with changeable elements or self -illuminated features such as changeable message signs will be excluded from viewsheds containing scenic resources to the greatest extent possible. Bridge lighting will be extended from the existing lighting along the abutment walls (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-172 VIA Design/Landscape Architecture Final Design Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-3 32 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO CULTURAL RESOURCES CR-1: If cultural materials are discovered during construction, all earth- moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area will be diverted until a qualified archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-177 Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) and Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), October 2014 Qualified Archaeologist, RE, and Contractor All ground disturbing activities, construction Standard Specification 14-2.03A Contact The District Environmental Branch Chief (DEBC), Gabrielle Duff ([909]) 383-6933) or District Native American Coordinator (DNAC), Gary Jones ([909] 383-7505) if any cultural elements or human remains are discovered. An additional survey will be required if the project changes to include areas not previously surveyed for cultural resources. Use on all "large operations" with a disturbed soil area of 50 acres or more or where the contractor will move 5,000 cubic yards or more of soil in a year. Use on all "large operations" for projects in the Coachella/Searless Valley Planning Area Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-4 33 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO CR-2: If human remains are discovered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that further disturbances and activities shall stop in any area or nearby area suspected to overlie remains, and the county coroner contacted. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98, if the remains are thought to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will then notify the Most Likely Descendent. At this time, the person who discovered the remains will contact the Caltrans District 8 Environmental Branch so that they may work with the Most Likely Descendent on the respectful treatment and disposition of the remains. Further provisions of PRC 5097.98 are to be followed as applicable. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-177 HPSR and ASR RE and Contractor All ground disturbing activities, construction Contact The District Environmental Branch Chief (DEBC), Gabrielle Duff ([909]) 383-6933) or District Native American Coordinator (DNAC), Gary Jones ([909] 383-7505) if any cultural elements or human remains are discovered. An additional survey will be required if the project changes to include areas not previously surveyed for cultural resources. CR-3: If project plans change following the approval of the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR), dated October 2014, or if the Undertaking will otherwise not be implemented as originally proposed, including, but not limited to changes in project scope or limits, or work outside the approved Area of Potential Effects (APE) approved October 7, 2014, Caltrans will re -open NHPA Section 106 and CEQA consultation pertaining to Historical Resources in order to determine whether the findings made in the HPSR remain valid. If changes are made to the project as described above, Caltrans PQS will determine the applicability of this measure, and additional studies may be required. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-177 IS/MND Caltrans PQS, RCTC Following approval of the Final ED if at any time project plans change. WATER QUALITY AND STORM WATER RUNOFF _ WR-1: Comply with the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit; Order No. 2009 0009 DWQ, as amended by Order No. 2010- 0014-DWQ and Order No. 2012 0006 DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002), and any subsequent permit, as they relate to construction activities for the project. This shall include submission of the permit registration documents, including a Notice Of Intent (NOI), risk assessment, site map, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), annual fee, and signed certification statement to SWRCB at least 14 days prior to the start of construction activity. The SWPPP shall 1) meet the requirements of the Construction General Permit and identify potential pollutant sources associated with construction activities; 2-204 Water Quality Assessment Report, April 2015 RE and Design/Build Contractor Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-5 34 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO 2) identify non -storm water discharges; and 3) identify, implement, and maintain BMPs to reduce or eliminate pollutants associated with the construction site. The BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be implemented during the project construction. A Notice of Termination shall be submitted to SWRCB upon completion of construction and the stabilization of the site. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) WR-2: Comply with the provisions of the General Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges to Surface Waters that Pose an Insignificant (De Minimis) Threat to Water Quality, Order No. R8-2009-0003, NPDES No. CAG998001, as they relate to discharge of non -storm water dewatering wastes for the project. This shall include submitting to the Santa Ana RWQCB an NOI at least 60 days prior to the start of construction, and notification of discharge at least five days prior to any planned discharges. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-204 Water Quality Assessment Report RE and Design/Build Contractor Construction WR-3: Comply with the provisions of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Santa Ana RWQCB, a Section 404 permit from the USACE, and a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW for impacts on jurisdictional areas. These regulatory permits shall be obtained prior to impacts within identified jurisdictional areas. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-204 Water Quality Assessment Report RCTC and Design/Build Contractor Construction/ Final Design WR-4: Comply with the provisions of the Caltrans Statewide NPDES Permit (Order No. 2012-0011-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000003), effective July 1, 2013 (known as the Caltrans MS4 permit). Project -specific BMPs and any applicable hydromodification features shall be incorporated into final design. The BMPs shall be properly designed and maintained to target pollutants of concern and reduce runoff from the project site. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-204 Water Quality Assessment Report Design Construction/ Final Design PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES _ PALEO-1: Grading, excavation, and other surface and subsurface excavation in defined proposed project have the potential to affect nonrenewable paleontological resources. A Paleontological Mitigation Plan (PMP) shall be prepared during final project design by a qualified paleontologist. The PMP will detail all the measures to be implemented in the event of paleontological discoveries. The PMP shall include, at a minimum, the following elements. a) Required 1-hour preconstruction paleontological awareness training for earthmoving personnel, including documentation of training, such as sign -in sheets, and hardhat stickers, to establish communications protocols between construction personnel and the principal paleontologist. b) There will be a signed repository agreement with an appropriate 2-224 Paleontological Identification Report/Paleontological Evaluation Report, September 2014 RE and Contractor During all ground disturbing activities and construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-6 35 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO repository that meets Caltrans requirements and is approved by Caltrans. c) Monitoring, by a principal paleontologist, of Pleistocene older alluvium during excavation. d) Field and laboratory methods that meet the curation requirements of the appropriate repository will be implemented for monitoring, reporting, collection, and curation of collected specimens. Curation requirements are available for public review at the appropriate repository. e) All elements of the PMP will follow the PMP Format published in the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (Caltrans 2003). f) A Paleontological Mitigation Report (PMR) discussing findings and analysis will be prepared by a principal paleontologist upon completion of project earthmoving. The report will be included in the environmental project file and also submitted to the curation facility. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) HAZARDOUS WASTE/MATERIALS HW-1: A Lead Compliance Plan will be prepared by the contractor to ensure worker safety. During construction, unknown hazardous materials may be encountered, or materials could be accidently spilled. Best Management Practices will be required to minimize or avoid these risks 2-229 Initial Site Assessment (ISA), December 2014 RCTC and Design/Build Contractor Prior to Demolition, Grading, During Grading/Construction HW-2: A Soil Management Plan will be developed to establish the notification, monitoring, profiling, confirmation sampling, and laboratory analysis of impacted soil for proper disposal of contaminated materials. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-229 ISA RCTC and Design/Build Contractor Prior to Demolition, Grading, During Grading/Construction HW-3: Prior to construction, limited soil sampling will be conducted during the final design phase in the area of staining observed in the median between Limonite Avenue and 68th Street. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-229 ISA RCTC and Design/Build Contractor Prior to Construction HW-4: Abatement of identified asbestos containing materials and lead based paint will be conducted prior to the renovation of the bridge structures. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-229 ISA RCTC and Design/Build Contractor Prior to Demolition, Grading, During Grading/Construction HW-5: During construction, sampling and analysis of yellow striping will be performed in accordance with Construction Program Procedure Bulletin 99-2 (Caltrans 2006). (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-229 ISA RCTC and Design/Build Contractor During Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-7 36 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO AIR QUALITY AQ-1: Implementation of Construction Measures to Reduce Fugitive Dust Emissions. Consistent with all applicable requirements, a fully executed Large Operation Notification Form will be submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Even though the project's emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD's significance thresholds for construction, as required by the SCAQMD's Fugitive Dust Rule 403, the project proponent must implement the applicable PM10- and PM2.5-reducing construction practices shown in Table 2-53 during construction of the proposed project. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-271 Air Quality Report (AQR), June 2015 RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Standard Specification 14- 9.02 AQ-2: All measures, pertinent to each source of PM10emissions which the project is responsible for, will be implemented as specified in SCAQMD Rule 403. 2-271 Initial Study/ Environmental Assessment RCTC and Design -Build Contractor During Grading/Construction AQ-3: All non -road construction equipment shall meet or exceed equivalent emissions performance of the United States Environmental Protection Agency Tier 4 standards. 2-271 Initial Study/ Environmental Assessment RCTC and Design -Build Contractor During Grading/Construction AQ-4: All on -road and off -road equipment shall comply with the California Air Resources Board (ARB) commercial vehicle idle regulations. 2-271 Air Quality Report (AQR), June 2015 RCTC and Design -Build Contractor During Grading/Construction AQ-5: The solicitation for construction bids shall include language requiring the use of energy and fuel -efficient fleets and zero -emission technologies for vehicles where possible. 2-271 Initial Study Environmental Assessment RCTC Prior to solicitation for construction bids AQ-6: Prior to construction, a training for contractors and their employees shall be developed and presented regarding air quality impacts from construction activities and potential health risks to nearby receptors, along with ways to reduce emissions. 2-271 Initial Study/ Environmental Assessment RCTC and Design -Build Contractor Prior to ground disturbance and during construction for new construction personnel NOISE N0I-1: Sound control shall conform to the provisions in Section 14-8.02, "Noise Control," of Caltrans' 2010 Standard Specifications and Special Provisions. The contractor shall not exceed 86 dBA Lmax at 50 feet from the job site from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. For areas of the project located within or adjacent to City of Corona limits, City of Corona Municipal Code Section 17.84040 (D)(2) shall also apply during construction (City of Corona 1999): Construction noise is prohibited between the hours of 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., Monday through Saturday and 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m. on Sundays and federal holidays. Construction noise is defined as noise which is disturbing, excessive or offensive and constitutes a nuisance involving discomfort or annoyance to persons of normal sensitivity residing in the area, which is generated by the use of any tools, machinery or equipment 2-413 Noise Study Report (NSR), July 2015 RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Standard Special Provision 14-8.02 Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-8 37 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO used in connection with construction operations. For areas of the project located within or adjacent to City of Norco limits, City of Norco Municipal Code Section 9.07.020 shall also apply during construction (City of Norco 2014): Construction -related single events or continuous events subject to a permit issued by the City of Norco are exempt from the City's municipal code. For areas of the project located within or adjacent to City of Eastvale limits, City of Eastvale Municipal Code Sec. 110.01.020 shall also apply during construction (City of Eastvale 2012): Any construction within the city located within one-fourth of a mile from an occupied residence shall be permitted Monday through Saturday, except nationally recognized holidays, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. There shall be no construction permitted on Sunday or nationally recognized holidays unless approval is obtained from the city building official or city engineer. For areas of the project located within or adjacent to City of Jurupa Valley or County of Riverside limits, The County of Riverside Municipal Code Sec. 9.52.070 shall also apply during construction (County of Riverside 2012): Exceptions may be requested from the standards set forth in Section 9.52.040 or 9.52.060 of this chapter and may be characterized as construction -related, single -event or continuous -events exceptions. Construction -Related Exceptions. An application for a construction -related exception shall be made to and considered by the director of building and safety on forms provided by the building and safety department and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. No public hearing is required. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) NOI-2: In conjunction with adhering to measure N0I-1 (above), if necessary in order to ensure implementation of measure N0I-1, the contractor may be required to implement additional noise reducing measures, including changing the location of stationary construction equipment, turning off idling equipment, rescheduling construction activity, notifying adjacent residents in advance of construction work, and installing acoustic barriers around stationary construction noise sources. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-414 NSR RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-9 38 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO NATURAL COMMUNITIES B10-1: Clearing of natural vegetation (including sage scrub) will be performed outside of the active breeding season for birds, as defined in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) (March 1 through June 30) (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3), except for Riversidian sage scrub (including disturbed) judged to be potentially suitable habitat for (and/or occupied by) California Gnatcatcher and located within Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan criteria areas and Public/Quasi-Public lands (stations 1784+00 through 1800+00). For these areas, the habitat removal restriction is extended from June 30 to August 15. In addition, for riparian-riverine vegetation occupied by LBV (Stations 2104 through 2106 [east side], Stations 2437 through 2455 [both sides], and Stations 2455 through 2476 [east side]), vegetation removal cannot occur through September 15. Natural, Sage Scrub, and Riparian Vegetation Clearing Restrictions 2-476 Natural Environment Study (NES), December 2014 RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Clearing Restriction Natural Vegetation With Clearing Restriction March 1— June 30 Coast Live Oak Woodland, Coast and Valley Freshwater Marsh, Mule Fat Scrub, Southern Cottonwood -Willow Riparian Forest, Nonnative Grassland (including remnant), Open Water, Riversidian Sage Scrub (including disturbed and remnant), and Southern Willow Scrub (including disturbed). March 1— August 15 Riversidian Sage Scrub, (including disturbed and remnant) where it occurs within criteria cell areas, Regional Conservation Authority Conserved Lands, and Public/Quasi- Public Conserved Lands. April 1— September 15 Coast and Valley Freshwater Marsh, Mule Fat Scrub, Southern Cottonwood -Willow Riparian Forest, Southern Willow Scrub (including disturbed). If clearing of vegetation needs to occur, a preconstruction nesting bird survey will need to be performed (refer to measure B10-31 for the nesting bird survey requirements). (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-10 39 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO B10-2: Active construction areas will be watered regularly to control dust and thus minimize impacts on adjacent vegetation (Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Volume I, Section 7.5.3). (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-477 NES RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction B10-3: When work is conducted during the fire season (as identified by the Riverside County Fire Department) adjacent to Riversidian Sage Scrub, appropriate firefighting equipment (e.g., extinguishers, shovels, water tankers) will be available on the project site during all phases of project construction to help minimize the chance of human -caused wildfires. Shields, protective mats, and/or other fire preventative methods will be used during grinding, welding, and other spark -inducing activities. Personnel trained in fire hazards, preventative actions, and responses to fires will advise contractors regarding fire risk from all construction -related activities (Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Volume I, Section 7.5.3). The Riversidian sage scrub that this measure applies to is located at Stations 1784 through 1807+50 and 1891 through 1907+50. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-477 NES RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction B10-4: A qualified biologist will conduct a training session for project and construction personnel (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3) prior to vegetation removal. The training will include a description of the species of concern and their habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Acts (FESA and CESA) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the acts and the MSHCP, the penalties associated with violating the provisions of the acts, the general measures that are being implemented to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the proposed project, and the access routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be accomplished (MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). All sensitive areas will be fenced as presented in measure B10-6. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-477 NES Qualified Biologist Monitor, RE and Contractor Training to be done prior to demolition/construction Fencing to be installed prior to Grading/Construction B10-5: The qualified biologist will monitor construction activities for the duration of the proposed project to ensure that practicable measures are being employed and to avoid incidental disturbance of habitat and species of concern outside the project footprint (Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Volume I, Section 7.5.3). Special attention will be provided to ensure that the ESA fencing required in measure B10-6 is maintained daily. Additionally, ongoing monitoring and reporting will occur for the duration of the construction activity to ensure implementation of BMPs. This will be done in concert with B10-13, which includes the fencing of sensitive areas. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-478 NES Qualified Biologist Monitor, RE, and Contractor During Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-11 40 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO B10-6: Construction personnel will strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and routes of travel. The construction area(s) will be the minimal area necessary to complete the proposed project and will be specified in the construction plans. Construction limits adjacent to sensitive resource areas will be demarcated using environmental sensitive area (ESA) fencing (e.g., orange snow screen). The ESA fencing will be reviewed at least weekly by the biological monitor (as indicated in measure B10-5) until the completion of all construction activities. For the ESA fencing installed in Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Core A (Santa Ana River), the fencing must exclude reptiles and amphibians (to the greatest extent feasible) from entering the limits of disturbance. Employees will be instructed that their activities are restricted to the construction areas (MSHCP Volume!, Appendix C). Access to sites will be from pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible (MSHCP Volume!, Section 7.5.3, and MSHCP Volume!, Appendix C). The ESA fencing will be applied at the following station locations: Northbound: Station 1783; Station 1787+25 to 1788+25; Station 1790+40 to 1791+30; Station 1792+00 to 1802+00; Station 1806+60 to 1807+60; Station 1813+80 to 1814+20; Station 1830+80 to 1831+00; Station 1839+60 to 1840+00; Station 1846+00 to 1847+00; Station 1870+80 to 1871+20 (off ramp); Station 1876+80 to 1879+20 (off ramp); Station 1883+00 to 1885+00 (on ramp); Station 1886+00 to 1888+40 (on ramp); Station 1991+00 to 1992+00; Station 1906+00 to 1914+20; Station 1929+50 to 1931+50; Station 1936+00 to 1936+40 (off ramp); Station 1940+00 to 1950+00 (on and off ramp); Station 1960+1966+00; Station 1970+00 to 1970+40; Station 1976+00 to 1977+00; Station 2001+00 to 2008+00; Station 2013+00 to 2015+00; Station 2036+80 to 3037+20 (off ramp); Station 2041+00 to 2045+20; Station 2054+80 to 2062+50; Station 2101+00 to 2104+50; Station 2179+50 to 2190+00 (SR-91 east bound connector ramp); Station 2192+40 to 2193+00; Station 2204+80 to 2208+50 (east side of Cresta Road); Station 2240+80 to 2241+20 (south side of Corona Circle); Station 2292+10 to 2293+10; Station 2437+40 to 2508+00; Station 2630+80 to 2714+80; Station 2715+60 to 2725+00; 2727+00 to 2731+50; Station 2745 to the segment of 1-15, north of the project limits to just above Jurupa Avenue in the City of Ontario within San Bernardino County (station numbering not available for this segment). Southbound: Station 1783+00 to 1790+25; Station 1793+40 to 1799+50; Station 1803+00 to 1828+00; Station 1888+00 to 1889+00; Station 1890+00 to 1900+80; Station 1908+00 to 1909+10; Station 1913+20 to 1923+00; Station 1929+00 to 1931+80; Station 1935+80 to 1936+20; Station 1964+00 to 1965+00; Station 2024+20 to 2025+10; Station 2055+60 to 2060+60; Station 2101+00 to 2102+10; Station 2105+20 to 2115+00; Station 2117+40 to 2129+80 (on ramp); Station 2140+80 to 2156+40; Station 2241+00 to 2-478 NES Qualified Biologist Monitor, RE, and Contractor ESA fencing to be installed prior to construction/demolition. Training to be done prior to demolition/construction. Implement during Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-12 41 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO 2241+80 (north side of Corona Circle); Station 2289+00 to 2290+60; Station 2382+00 to 2401+20; Station 2414+60 to 2422+80; Station 2423+20 to 2426+00; 2434+60 to 2455+80; Station 2508+80 to 2509+20; Station 2510+60 to 2546+80; Station 2547+80 to 2574+00; Station 2610+80 to 2636+00; Station 2644+80 to 2706+00; Station 2706+60 to 2716+80; Station 2718+80 to 2734+10; Station 2746+40 to the segment of 1-15, north of the project limits to just above Jurupa Avenue in the City of Ontario within San Bernardino County (station numbering not available for this segment). (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) BI0-7: A qualified biologist will ensure that exotic and invasive plant species (Cal-IPC 2006, 2007) will be removed during construction and will be properly handled to prevent sprouting or regrowth (Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Volume!, Section 7.5.3). The biological monitor will monitor the removal of exotic plants on the construction site. Prior to any removal, the contractor will provide to the biological monitor a Weed Abatement Plan, which will include (1) the approach taken to manage the removed, cut vegetation such that sprouting or regrowth does not occur and (2) the location and timing of disposal. This will be provided in writing. The prime contractor and the biologist will be ultimately responsible for ensuring this measure is executed properly. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-479 NES RE, Contractor, and Biologist During Grading/Construction BI0-8: All construction vehicles prior to entering the project site will be washed (cleaned of mud or other debris that may contain invasive plants and/or seeds) at the construction yard to ensure no seeds are clinging to the vehicle prior to arriving at the project area. The construction yard must be outside the SAR floodplain/canyon and at least 300 feet from ESA fencing. The biological monitor will be responsible for inspecting all newly arriving washed construction vehicles and ensuring that any construction vehicles leaving the SAR project area are properly washed. Any unwashed or inadequately washed construction vehicles deemed as such by the biological monitor will return to the construction yard for washing. The prime contractor has full responsibility for ensuring this measure is followed. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-479 NES RE, Contractor, and Biologist During Grading/Construction BI0-9: Vegetation will be covered (e.g., with tarps) while being carried on trucks, and vegetation materials removed from the site will be disposed of in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Disposal of any vegetation (native or nonnative) or materials removed from the project site must be transported to a legal landfill or recycling entity. No dumping of vegetation is to occur in the project area including any portion of the SAR floodplain/canyon. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-479 NES RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-13 42 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO B10-10: Post -construction, any disturbed areas remaining as bare ground will be hydro -seeded with a Caltrans-approved seed mix in accordance with agency -approved restoration plans and regulatory permits. In addition, a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) will be implemented, which will describe specific measures and requirements for riparian-riverine habitat restoration. The final HMMP will be provided to the RCA. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-479 NES RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction B10-11: The permittee (in this case, Caltrans and Riverside County Transportation Commission) will have the right to access and inspect any sites of approved projects for compliance with project approval conditions, including best management practices (Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Volume I, Appendix C) (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-480 NES RCTC, RE, Contractor During Grading/Construction B10-12: Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared. The plans will describe sediment and hazardous materials control, dewatering or diversion structures, fueling and equipment management practices, and use of plant material for erosion control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the County of Riverside and Caltrans prior to construction (Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Volume I, Section 7.5.3). The following measures will be provided: a) Water pollution and erosion control plans will be developed and implemented in accordance with RWQCB requirements (MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C) and will ensure that no fluids or sediment from construction will enter into the environmentally sensitive area fenced areas. Refer to measure B10-6 for locations. b) New surface flows will be treated prior to reaching waterways. c) Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils are determined to be successfully stabilized (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3). d) No erodible materials will be deposited into watercourses or areas demarcated with ESA fencing, as listed in measure B10-6 above. Brush, loose soils, or other debris material will not be stockpiled within stream channels or on adjacent banks (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3, and MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). e) Projects that cannot be conducted without placing equipment or personnel in riparian vegetation areas should be timed to avoid the breeding season of riparian -associated species identified in MSHCP Global Species Objective No. 7 (MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). Breeding season as defined by the MSHCP is March 1 through June 30. f) If streamflows must be diverted, the diversions will be conducted using 2-480 NES RCTC, RE, Contractor Prepare plans prior to construction and implement during grading/construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-14 43 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO sandbags or other methods requiring minimal instream impacts. Silt fencing or other sediment -trapping materials will be installed at the downstream end of construction activity to minimize the transport of sediments off site. Settling ponds where sediment is collected will be cleaned out in a manner that prevents the sediment from reentering the stream. Care will be exercised when removing silt fences, as feasible, to prevent debris or sediment from returning to the stream (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3, and MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). Short-term diversions will consider effects on wildlife (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3). All water diversions within the SAR will be monitored by a qualified biologist to avoid impacts on Santa Ana sucker, as discussed in BI0-24. g) Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas will be located on nonsensitive upland sites with minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3, and MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). These designated areas will be located in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions will be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface waters. Project - related spills of hazardous materials will be reported to appropriate entities including, but not limited to, the applicable jurisdictional city, USFWS, CDFW, and the RWQCB, will be cleaned up immediately, and contaminated soils will be removed to approved disposal areas (MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). h) All equipment maintenance, staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil, coolant, or any other toxic substances will occur only in designated areas within the proposed grading limits of the project site. These designated areas will be clearly marked and located in such a manner as to contain runoff (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3). (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) BI0-13: The limits of disturbance, including the upstream, downstream, and lateral extents on either side of any stream adjacent to the project impact footprint, will be clearly defined (and marked in the field), and ESA fence will be shown on plans in advance of any work being performed that could affect resource(s) being protected by the ESA fence. Biological monitoring personnel will review the limits of disturbance prior to initiation of construction activities (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3, and MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). The upstream and downstream limits of project disturbance plus the lateral limits of disturbance on either side of the stream will be clearly defined and marked in the field, including ESA fencing installed during construction to ensure avoidance of jurisdictional areas and riparian habitat(refer to measure BI0-6 for location). Monitoring personnel will review the limits of disturbance prior to initiation of construction activities. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-481 NES RE and Contractor Prior to Ground Disturbance (Install fencing)/During construction (maintain fencing) Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-15 44 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO BI0-14: During construction, the placement of equipment within a stream or on adjacent banks or adjacent upland habitats occupied by Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) covered species that are outside of the project footprint will be avoided to the greatest extent feasible (MSHCP Volume I, Section 7.5.3, and MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C). There will be no work beyond the ESA fencing even when the TCE extends beyond the ESA fencing. The ESA fencing and TCEs will be depicted on the construction plans used in the field by the construction crew and biological monitor. Where there is no ESA fencing, no work can occur beyond the TCE. If any ground disturbance needs to occur beyond the ESA or TCE limits at a location, then there must be a pullback of impact at another location, such that the amount and type of impact does not exceed what was presented in the project DBESP. A biological monitor shall review the new area proposed for impact and the area proposed for pullback from impact. Both areas will be mapped and quantified using a sub -meter accurate GPS with a description of habitat types between the two areas and why the areas are comparable in quality. Photographs will be taken to justify the valuation and conclusions of habitat equivalency. A Memorandum detailing the "equivalency" review will be provided to the RCA, USFWS, and CDFW for review and concurrence prior to any ground disturbance beyond the mapped ESA and TCE limits. Once approved by the wildlife agencies, the ESA fencing or TCE limits will be revised in the field with oversight by the biological monitor. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) Directly prior to ground disturbance, the biological monitor will, to the extent feasible, ensure no direct mortality to MSHCP-covered species occurs. This may involve flushing animals from the direct impact area or, when feasible, capturing individuals and releasing them well beyond the TCE. Any capture of native animals that require permits or permissions will be conducted by a biologist with the necessary permit approvals. If there is a species present that needs to be relocated and requires permission from the wildlife agencies beyond permits and approvals already provided to the project or approved by the biologist's permits/Memorandum of Understanding/Collecting Permit, the biological monitor will coordinate with the wildlife agencies to receive approval prior to capturing the species. 2-481 NES RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction BI0-15: A Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) report that provides analysis of direct and indirect impacts, avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation, along with the functions and values of the resources being affected as related to Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan covered species, was approved by RCA, USFWS, and CDFW for review on April 14, 2016. All measures identified in the final DBESP shall be implemented as part of the project. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-482 NES RCTC After approval of the NES Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-16 45 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO B10-16: Compensation of permanent impacts on 2.62 acres of riparian- riverine resources (including permanent shading) would occur at a 3:1 ratio for riparian resources and a 1:1 ratio for ephemeral drainages. The compensation, 6.33 acres for 2.11 acres of riparian resources and 0.51 acre for 0.51 acre of ephemeral resources, can be a combination of enhancement, restoration, and/or creation (rehabilitation) as long as there is no net loss of riparian-riverine resources. The project will mitigate for impacts on 0.68 acre of CDFW jurisdictional waters of the State, 2.82 acres of RWQCB jurisdictional waters of the state, 0.17 acre of federal jurisdictional non - wetlands, and 0.14 acre of federal jurisdictional wetlands at a minimum 1:1 ratio. This means that, at the very least, the amount of riparian-riverine resources removed and the amount being created (rehabilitated) must be at a 1:1 ratio. The remaining compensation can occur as enhancement and restoration. Compensatory mitigation will be coordinated with Clean Water Act (CWA) 401 and 404 permitting and CDFW 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement acquisition to ensure efficiencies with the mitigation effort. Purchase of mitigation bank credits through an approved in -lieu fee program and/or creation of riparian-riverine resources, including federal and state jurisdictional water resources within the Santa Ana River watershed, will be researched as an option; however, compensation must occur within the SAR and/or directly adjacent. The compensation required under this measure should incorporate the creation of occupied least Bell's vireo (LBV) habitat for time and monetary efficiencies (refer to measure B10-26 for more details on LBV compensatory mitigation). 2-482 NES RCTC After approval of the ED, Prior to Construction B10-17: The temporary impacts on 14.90 acres of riparian-riverine resources are to be replaced through restoration at their current locations at a 1:1 ratio, except for the 1.70 acres of southern cottonwood willow riparian forest; it will be restored at its current location at a 1:1 ratio, and off -site compensation will occur at a 2:1 ratio (i.e., 1.70 acres x 2 equals 3.40 acres) Details of this compensation have been provided in the Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation report (measure B10-15). To reduce temporal loss of temporary impacts on riparian vegetation at the SAR, if feasible, riparian vegetation will be removed from the temporary impact footprint through cutting, whereby vegetation will be cut to ground level, thus leaving the root system. All riparian-riverine areas will be revegetated with similar riparian vegetation as was present prior to impacts or will be vegetated with appropriate native vegetation if it was not present prior to construction. A detailed HMMP will be required with the final HMMP provided to the RCA. Monitoring will occur for no less than five years for riparian vegetated impact areas, once seeding and planting is completed. Because the federally and state -listed as endangered least Bell's vireo occupies the riparian-riverine resources at the Santa Ana River area proposed for impact, the 2-482 NES RCTC After approval of the ED, Prior to Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-17 46 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO compensation for both riparian-riverine resources and least Bell's vireo will be integrated. The mitigation ratios presented in this measure are required at a minimum to reduce permanent and temporary impacts on riparian-riverine resources to a level of less than significant under CEQA and not adverse under NEPA. Final mitigation ratios for impacts triggering CWA 401 and 404 permitting and CDFW 1602 will be determined through consultation with USACE, RWQCB, USFWS, and CDFW. (CEQA/NEPA, mitigation measure) BI0-18: Night lighting will be directed away from natural lands within potential Western Riverside County MSHCP conservation areas in order to support potential linkage and core functions during construction. This is intended to protect species within potential MSHCP conservation areas from direct night lighting during construction, if activities occur at night. This would apply for the following areas: lands on the east side of 1-15 from Lawson Road north for 4,000 feet, and lands on the east and west of 1-15 from just south of the Santa Ana River north for 4,000 feet (i.e., east of Stations 1783+00 to 1820+00, west of Stations 2434+80 to 2454+10, and east of Stations 2439+75 to 2476+00). The MSHCP requires that shielding be incorporated in project designs to ensure ambient lighting in MSHCP conservation areas is not increased (MSHCP Volume I, Section 6.1.4). A biological monitor will monitor compliance in the SAR project area throughout the project and will include this compliance monitoring as a regular item in the weekly SAR monitoring reports to Caltrans, RCTC, CDFW, and USFWS. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-483 NES RE, Contractor, and Biologist During Grading/Construction BI0-19: To avoid or minimize potential terrestrial wildlife mortality on 1-15, chain link fence repairs and/or improvements will be made so that animals are dissuaded from moving onto the facility. Installation and/or improvements to fencing will be directed and overseen by a qualified biologist familiar with wildlife animal movement measures: a) Santa Ana River bridge — Adjust and install chain link fencing to funnel wildlife underneath this bridge so that animals do not move onto the I- 15 facility. This includes installation of fencing between the two bridge spans. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-483 NES RE, Contractor, and Biologist Prior to Ground Disturbance (Install fencing)/During construction (maintain fencing) Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-18 47 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO BI0-20: To maintain functionality of the Santa Ana River as a wildlife undercrossing, a minimum Openness Index (formula = width [in meters] x height [in meters] / length [in meters]) of 0.6 meter (having a minimum height of 10 to 20 feet) underneath the bridges at the I- 15 crossing will be maintained at all times during construction. The undersides of the existing bridges are approximately 22 feet above the ground, and the distance between the outside edges of the two bridges is approximately 160 feet. 2-490 NES RE, Contractor, and Biologist Prior to Ground Disturbance (Install opening)/During construction (maintain opening) BI0-21: Between March 15 and September 15, all heavy equipment will install and maintain mufflers or other noise -reducing features when working adjacent to riparian vegetated areas. A biological monitor shall monitor and log sound levels at the edge of the limits of disturbance (LOD) within the riparian vegetation to ensure noise levels do not result in a disruption to nesting birds (typically at 60 decibels). If construction noise is negatively affecting nesting birds, work shall cease (unless authorized by the wildlife agencies) until adequate sound barriers can be constructed to reduce noise levels at the edge of the riparian corridor where intense noise/vibration- producing work is being conducted. It may be most effective to construct noise barriers well prior to March 15 to ensure construction delays do not occur. All sound barriers would need to be constructed within the LOD and should not interrupt wildlife movement within the SAR. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-483 NES RE, Contractor, and Biologist During Grading/Construction that occurs between March 15 and September 15 BI0-22: Once the environmentally sensitive areas (ESA) fencing has been installed in Core A (Santa Ana River), a preconstruction reptile and amphibian survey will be conducted no more than two days prior to site grubbing and grading of lands in this area. The purpose of the survey is to locate any amphibians and reptiles within the limits of disturbance (LOD) and relocate these animals to beyond the LOD. If any coast horned lizards or orange - throated whiptails are caught and relocated, the release locations will be recorded as GPS coordinates, and the observations (including release locations) will be provided to the CNDDB and the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Biological Monitoring Program. If construction is to occur in stages, then the preconstruction survey would be scheduled to follow just prior to site grubbing and grading. No special permits are necessary beyond a CDFW Scientific Collecting Permit. This measure is not required at any other riparian-riverine resource areas because they are either not proposed for direct impact or potential habitat for reptiles and amphibians is not present. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-483 NES RCTC, RE, and Contractor Prior to Ground Disturbance (Install fencing)/During Construction (maintain fencing) Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-19 48 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO B10-23: Public/Quasi-Public lands in Existing Core A permanently removed (0.12 acre) will be replaced at a 1:1 ratio. This will be coordinated with riparian-riverine compensation and jurisdictional resources permitting. Prior to land acquisition or purchase of mitigation credits, an equivalency report will be provided that analyzes the existing biological resources being permanently removed to the biological resources supported by the lands proposed for acquisition. The resource values will need to be equivalent and reviewed by the RCA, USFWS, and CDFW. Execution of this mitigation measure is provided under the compensatory mitigation needed for least Bell's vireo (B10-26) and riparian-riverine resources (B10-15, B10-16, B10-17) at the Santa Ana River. 2-490 NES RCTC After Approval of the ED, Prior to Construction B10-24: A qualified monitor will be present during all construction phase work occurring in or within surface waters that are themselves within 300 feet of the Santa Ana River. Temporary dewatering of the channel (e.g., for construction falsework) shall be for the minimum period, over the minimum area feasible, and performed in a manner to ensure no entrapment or escape of fishes into drying areas. The monitor will be qualified to move fish, particularly Santa Ana sucker, out of entrapped areas. In addition, a native fish protection plan will be prepared for impacts on the SAR. The plan will include a detailed diversion/dewatering plan and avoidance and minimization measures for all native fish with the potential to occur at this location, and the native fish protection plan will be reviewed and approved by the wildlife agencies. The fish protection plan will include (at a minimum): a) Design plans for dewatering/diversion (including equipment ingress and egress, sizing of dewatering/diversion, etc.). The plan will identify the type(s) of water diversion proposed and should clarify if the dewatering/diversion structure(s) will be anchored into the substrate (and, if so, how this will be accomplished). b) Location of dewatering/diversion (marked on a map), including locations of all proposed BMPs. c) Seasonal timing of dewatering/diversion and length of time dewatering/diversion is expected to occur. Dewatering/diversion will avoid the Santa Ana sucker and arroyo chub breeding season. Although variable, the breeding season is generally identified as March 1 through July 30, but may be as early as mid -January. Should dewatering/diversion activities take place during this time, monitor spawning and larval fish. d) Clarification on how dewatering/diversion will not pose a barrier to fish movement. e) Methodology proposed to prevent entrainment during dewatering/diversion. If screening/netting is proposed as part of this process, provide screen/netting sizing. Also describe the 2-484 NES RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-20 49 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO netting/screening process, including whether it will be temporary, used only during construction of the in -stream diversion, how long blocking nets be in place, and how long the nets are anticipated to function. f) Frequency of monitoring for entrainment, water quality, and BMPs. Elaborate on when monitoring will occur (e.g., only during construction). g) Specific qualifications for each type of monitor (e.g., qualifications of native fish monitor versus water quality monitor versus BMP monitor). At least one of the biological monitors will need to hold a valid 10(a)(1)(A) permit to handle Santa Ana sucker and include electroshocking on his/her permit. All other biological monitors who will participate in fishing activities will have prior experience identifying, at minimum, arroyo chub and Santa Ana sucker at various life stages, including the larval and pre - juvenile size classes. h) Description of how captured fish will be processed. It is recommended that when work on a reach of stream occurs, first place block nets both upstream and downstream of the proposed work area. Once these are installed, electroshock the fish to remove them from the work area. These fish can then be placed outside (up or downstream) of the work area immediately. If alternate methodology is proposed, please elaborate in detail. i) Full descriptions of all methodologies proposed to capture fish (e.g., electro-shocking, netting, seining, etc.). Information on electro-shocker settings and net sizing will be included in the plan, as well as minimum qualifications and amount of experience of the proposed monitors with each of the proposed methodologies. The monitor will have has prior experience using proposed methodologies, and at least one permitted sucker biologist will be present. j) Submission of weekly monitoring reports (reports will cover native fish, water quality, and BMP monitoring) to USFWS and CDFW to ensure compliance. k) Requirement for any nonnative fish captures to be euthanized on site and transported off site to an appropriate landfill. I) In addition to the removal of nonnative plant species (B10-7), removal of giant reed (Arundo donax) and tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) at the SAR to avoid repeat infestations. A methodology on how these plant removals will occur will be detailed and will include appropriate measures to ensure no impact on native wildlife. m) The spawning season for arroyo chub is March through August. n) The spawning season for Santa Ana sucker can be as early as mid - January through July. o) The dewatering/diversion avoidance window is mid -January through Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-21 50 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO August if either species is present. p) The avoidance construction window shall be stated in the Special Provisions and enforced by the Caltrans Resident Engineer. However, it is understood the native fish protection plan will be developed in coordination with the wildlife agencies by the design/build contractor. As such, the contractor will aware of the restrictions and needs of native fish. q) If the dewatering/diversion avoidance window is not practicable, the Native Fish Protection Plan will ensure that a qualified biologist (with the necessary permits and permissions to sample for eggs and larval fish) will sample the proposed dewatering/diversion areas for the presence of Santa Ana sucker and arroyo chub. If either species is present, no relocation can take place until larval fish are at least 20 millimeters in length and deemed old enough to relocate safely. Further details, as needed, will be provided in the draft Native Fish Protection Plan that will be approved by the wildlife agencies. If no larval fish are present of either species, a report will be provided to the wildlife agencies for approval and concurrence prior to any dewatering/diversion activities. r) Provide minimization measures for protection of sucker and chub larval fish. s) Provide minimization measures to reduce impacts to native fish from aquatic noise caused during construction and consider measures separately for the different age classes. Full details will be provided in the draft native fish protection plan. t) To mitigate for the temporary and permanent impacts on Santa Ana sucker and arroyo chub, RCTC will provide funding to the Riverside - Corona Resource Conservation District (RCRCD) for the restoration of sucker/chub habitat at the RCRCD Altfillisch property just downstream of the Hamner Avenue Bridge. The restoration will place cabled bounders along the south side of the SAR in order to provide enhanced substrate refugia habitat that does not exist in the river. Native cuttings will be planted along the water line to improve both shading and anchoring of the rock. The work will include exotic removal and control, engineering of boulder clusters, monitoring in perpetuity, monthly fish occupation surveys for first two years, and annual reports. Full details of the off -site restoration will be approved by the wildlife agencies and the RCA and memorialized in writing and provided to the wildlife agencies and the RCA for their files. Temporarily affected areas will be returned to their original or better condition, including channel contours and substrate where impacts occur. However, no on -site restoration will occur. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-22 51 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO B10-26: The permanent removal of occupied least Bell's vireo (LBV)habitat (termed use areas in this document) will be compensated at a 3:1 ratio, with compensation occurring as creation and/or restoration. For all LBV occupied habitat temporarily removed during construction, restoration would occur at their original location at a 1:1 ratio. Creation and restoration potential is present at the Santa Ana River with all compensation within or directly adjacent to the SAR. Compensation for LBV impacts should be coordinated with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan riparian-riverine resources mitigation (measures B10-16 and B10-17) and water permitting for time and monetary efficiencies. (CEQA/NEPA, mitigation measure) 2-486 NES RCTC After Approval of the ED, Prior to Construction B10-27: To avoid attracting predators of the special -status species, the project site will be kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items will be enclosed in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s) (Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Volume!, Appendix C). (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-486 NES RE, Contractor, and Biologist During Grading/Construction B10-29: A Bat Management Plan will be developed to ensure mortality to bats does not occur and to document the extent of bat habitation in the limits of disturbance (LOD) and directly adjacent lands. A coarse -scale bat habitat evaluation was performed. The following items will be included in the plan, at a minimum: a) A qualified bat biologist will perform a detailed field review of the potential bat habitat structures. Potential bat structures are located at the following 1-15 overcrossings/undercrossings: Weirick Road/Dos Lagos Drive (Station 1883), a channel (Station 1833+50), a creek (Station 1930+10), East Ontario Avenue (Station 2043+50), El Cerrito Road (Station 1996+50), Old Temescal Road (Station 2080+00), Magnolia Avenue (Station 2130+00), Temecal Wash channel (Station 2157+50), East 6th Street (Station 2162+40), railroad/channel (Station 2180+00), I- 15/SR-91 interchange bridges (approximately Station 2190+00), East Parkridge Avenue (Station 2208), Corona Avenue (Station 2243+00), Hidden Valley Parkway (Station 2263), Second Street (Station 2304), Detroit Street (Station 2423), Santa Ana River (Station 2450+00), 68th Street (Station 2508+50), Limonite Avenue (Station 2547), Bellgrave Avenue (Station 2605+20), Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road (Station 2645+20), Riverside Drive (Station 2705+80), I-15/SR-60 interchange bridges (Station 2717+50), East Mission Avenue (Station 2743), and Philadelphia Avenue (Station 2760). The field review will determine the level of survey needed to assess presence/absence of bats at each structure and will be performed in late spring/summer at least one year prior (preferably two years prior) to construction for possible occupation and resulting avoidance. 2-487 NES RCTC Prior to Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-23 52 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO b) For structures confirmed to be potentially suitable for bat roosting/nursery, exit counts and acoustic surveys will be performed to determine whether a structure supports a nursery or roost and by which species. The presence of Townsend's big -eared bat will be determined through the surveys, which may include acoustic surveys if possible. This species can be difficult to detect. This survey work will occur in late- spring/summer at least one year, and preferably two years, prior to construction and potentially again in the following fall, depending on the results of the summer work. This would be determined by the bat biologist. c) For each location confirmed to be occupied by bats, the plan will provide details, both in text and graphically, of where exclusion devices will need to be placed, the timing for exclusion work, and the timeline and methodology needed to exclude the bats. d) Monitoring activities and schedule will be included, including frequency of monitoring, which structures would need to be monitored, and reporting requirements. e) Details on placement of man-made roosting habitat panels, including design, placement location, and timing of placement, will be included. These panels must be placed at least nine months prior to the exclusion of the bats. f) The draft plan will be reviewed and approved by CDFW. g) The final bat management plan will be completed prior to Notice to Proceed 2 (NTP 2) and will be included in the Environmental Management Plan. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) BI0-31: Nesting Bird Management Plan — Due to the complexity of the project at the Santa Ana River as well as the many bridges and mature trees along the Caltrans right-of-way, a nesting bird management plan will be drafted to provide a comprehensive approach to handling nesting birds well prior to the commencement of construction. The measures provided below may be revised as needed by the wildlife agencies during approval of the nesting bird management plan. The plan will include, at a minimum, the following items: a) A qualified biologist will perform a detailed field review in a late spring/summer prior to construction) and document the location of LBV, raptor, and/or corvid nests along with sign of colonial nesting birds within the limits of disturbance and adjacent lands. This field review is to only provide the range of issues and provide a snapshot in time as to what the types and kinds of nesting bird issues need (at the very least) to be addressed in the nesting bird management plan. The nesting bird management plan will address the seasonal windows and survey needs 2-488 NES RCTC and Contractor After Approval of the ED, Prior to construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-24 53 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Environmental Compliance Remarks YES NO as well as noise abatement measures that will occur just prior to construction. Known and potential colonial nesting bird structures are detailed in measure BI0-29 above. The colonial nesting bird review should be performed in conjunction with measure BI0-29. b) Results of the field review will be used to draft approaches and survey methodologies for dealing with potential nesting species. The plan will include needed actions to protect nesting birds, including buffer size, etc. The nesting bird management plan will address the seasonal windows and survey needs as well as noise abatement measures that will occur just prior to construction. A single approach and methodology will not suffice for all species with potential to nest. This plan will be coordinated with USFWS and CDFW, with final approval being provided by both agencies in 2017 prior to construction in 2018. Below is a basic nesting bird survey method that can be incorporated into the document. At the very least, the plan must provide assurance that birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and similar protections under the California Fish and Game Code or federal and state Endangered Species Acts will not be harmed. The details in this plan will be coordinated with any water permitting that may have nesting bird stipulations. Within seven days prior to the commencement of construction activities (if between January 15 and September 1), a qualified biologist will perform a nesting bird (including raptors, colonial nesting species, and riparian bird species) survey that will consist of at least two site visits to each area with potential nesting habitat to determine whether there are active nests within 300 feet of the project footprint. This survey will also identify the species and, to the degree feasible, nesting stage (e.g., incubation of young, feeding of young, near fledging). Nests will be mapped (not by using GPS because close encroachment may cause nest abandonment). If active nests are found, construction will not occur within 300 feet of the nest until the nesting attempt has been completed and/or abandoned because of non -project related reasons. If pile -driving or similar work (e.g., coffer dam installation) is being conducted, the buffer should be increased if feasible to avoid noise and vibration impacts on nesting species (See BI0-21 for detailed noise avoidance measure). Colonial nesting species have been observed at the following overcrossings: Weirick Road (Station 1883+00), Temescal Wash channel (Station 2157+50), railroad/channel (Station 2180+00), I-15/SR- 91 interchange overcrossing (approximately Station 2190+00), Corona Avenue (Station 2243+00), and the Santa Ana River bridges (Station 2450+00). c) The final nesting bird management plan will be completed prior to NTP 2 and will be included in the Environmental Management Plan. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-25 54 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS Refer to measures B10-1 through B10-14, B10-16 through B10-19, B10-21, B10-22, B10-24, B10-26, B10-27, B10-29, and B10-31. PLANT SPECIES Refer to measures B10-2 through B10-14. ANIMAL SPECIES Refer to measures B10-1 through B10-29 and B10-31. B10-28: Burrowing owl management plan will be written. In the plan, the following information, at a minimum, will be included and performed for the project: a) Focused Survey for Burrowing Owl — Performed following the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) protocol between the window of March 1 through August 31 and in the survey season prior to scheduled construction. The survey will include the proposed limits of disturbance (LOD) and up to a 300-foot buffer if performed between February 1 and August 31. b) Preconstruction Survey for Burrowing Owl — Performed within 30 days prior to ground disturbance regardless of whether the species is found during the focused survey. The survey area would be the LOD and at least a 100-foot buffer. c) Protocol for Presence — Steps necessary for handling the presence of burrowing owl (if found during either of the two surveys), which may include full avoidance, if feasible, or passive relocation by a qualified ornithologist. d) Agency Approval — the burrowing owl management plan will need approval by RCA, USFWS, and CDFW and will be provided to these agencies for review no later than August 31, 2016. Final approval by the RCA and the wildlife agencies will be required prior to any ground disturbance.. e) The final burrowing owl management plan will be completed prior to NTP 2 and will be included in the Environmental Management Plan. (CEQA/NEPA, avoidance and minimization measure) 2-531 NES RCTC and Caltrans After Approval of the ED, Prior to construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-26 55 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO B10-30: All structures on bridges supporting bat nursery/roosting habitat will be returned to original or better condition at the completion of construction, where feasible. Where this is not feasible, permanent loss of such habitat will be mitigated through creation of suitable nursery/roosting habitat at no less than a 1:1 ratio. This would be coordinated with CDFW. (CEQA/NEPA, mitigation measure) 2-532 NES RCTC and Contractor After Approval of the ED, Following construction Creation may consist of building and securing man-made constructed bat nursery/roost habitat on the I-15/Santa Ana bridge and/or placement of such habitat on suitable bridges up or downstream of the I-15/Santa Ana River bridge. B10-32: If Townsend's big -eared bat is confirmed present at the Santa Ana River, restoration of temporarily affected roosting/nursery habitat and replacement of permanently affected roosting/nursery habitat will occur at no less than a 1:1 ratio. This would be coordinated with CDFW under Section 2081 of CESA. (CEQA/NEPA, mitigation measure) 2-532 NES RCTC After Approval of the ED, Prior to Construction Creation may consist of building and securing man-made constructed bat nursery/roost habitat on the I-15/Santa Ana bridge and/or placement of such habitat on suitable bridges up or downstream of the I-15/Santa Ana River bridge. THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES B10-25: In compliance with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the permanent removal and shading of potential habitat for Santa Ana Sucker at the Santa Ana River will be replaced at a minimum of 1:1 ratio such that compensation is equivalent or superior to the acreage permanently affected by the Build Alternative. This replacement may be coordinated with the water permit. Mitigation has been reviewed by USFWS and CDFW and was found to be consistent with the MSHCP. Refer to B10-24 for additional details. (CEQA/NEPA, mitigation measure) 2-551 NES RCTC After Approval of the ED, Prior to Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-27 56 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO B10-33: In compliance with the biological opinion (dated April 20, 2016, revised April 29, 2016), no more than 24.00 acres of direct impacts on potentially suitable habitat for SKR can occur under the Build Alternative (Preferred Alternative) within the SKR HCP fee area. If this take threshold is reached, Caltrans will ensure any operations causing such take will cease and reinitiate consultation. To ensure no more than 24.00 acres is impacted, Caltrans shall ensure a biological monitor tracks the identified SKR habitat that is subject to disturbance. Once the biological monitor has determined permanent and temporary impacts on SKR habitat have reached 80 percent of anticipated disturbance (19 .2 acres ), the biological monitor will map all potential SKR habitat disturbed with a sub -meter GPS weekly. Caltrans shall monitor and report on compliance with the established take threshold for all SKR habitat associated with the proposed action. (CEQA/NEPA, mitigation measure) 2-552 BO RE, Contractor, and Biologist During Grading/Construction Refer to measures B10-1 through B10-18, B10-21, B10-24, B10-26, B10-27, and B10-31 listed above. INVASIVE SPECIES Refer to measures B10-3 and B10-5 through B10-10 listed above. CLIMATE CHANGE CC-1: Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol are working with regional agencies to implement intelligent transportation systems (ITS), which help manage the efficiency of the existing highway system. ITS is commonly referred to as electronics, communications, or information processing, used singly or in combination, to improve the efficiency or safety of a surface transportation system. (CEQA/ minimization measure) 2-611 Air Quality Report RCTC and Caltrans During Final Design CC-2: The project would incorporate energy -efficient lighting, such as light- emitting diode (LED) traffic signals. LED bulbs cost $60 to $70 each but last five to six years, compared with the one-year average lifespan of the incandescent bulbs that were previously used. The LED bulbs themselves would consume 10 percent of the electricity of traditional lights, which would also help reduce the project's CO2 emissions. (CEQA/ minimization measure) 2-611 Air Quality Report RCTC, RE, Contractor Final Design, Construction CC-3: According to Caltrans' Standard Specifications, the contractor must comply with all of SCAQMD's rules, ordinances, and regulations regarding air quality restrictions. See also minimization measure AQ-1. (CEQA/ minimization measure) 2-611 Air Quality Report RE and Contractor During Grading/Construction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-28 57 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record Date of ECR: April 2016 Type/Date of Environmental Compliance: CEQA — IS with MND NEPA — EA with FONSI Project Phase: ® PA/ED (FED) ❑ PS&E Submittal ❑ ReValidation ( # _ ) During: _ Phase ❑ Ready To List ❑ Construction ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS RECORD Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 8—RIV-15 PM RIV-15 34.7 to SBd-15 1.3 EA 08-0J0800 PN 0800000283 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Page # in Env. Doc. Environmental Analysis Source (Technical Study, Environmental Document, and/or Technical Discipline) Responsible for Development and/or Implementation of Measure Timing/ Phase If applicable, corresponding construction provision: (standard, special, non- standard) Action(s) Taken to Implement Measure Measure Completed (Date and Initials) Remarks Environmental Compliance YES NO Appendix B, Section 4(f) Evaluation B-1: During Final Design, prior to Environmental Certification for this portion of the project, and prior to any construction activities related to the portion of the project within the City of Norco, a meeting with the city/community regarding the project's temporary impacts to River Trails Park will be scheduled. (NEPA / minimization measure) B-17 Appendix B, Section 4(f) Evaluation RCTC During Final Design, and prior to Environmental Certification B-2: During Final Design, and prior to Environmental Certification, coordinate timing for temporary closure of the River Trails Park area under the 1-15 Santa Ana River Bridge with the City of Norco's Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments. (NEPA / minimization measure) B-17 Appendix B, Section 4(f) Evaluation RCTC During Final Design, and prior to Environmental Certification B-3: During Final Design, and prior to Environmental Certification, prepare and approve a detour plan for equestrian use, based on coordination with the City of Norco's Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments. (NEPA / minimization measure) B-18 Appendix B, Section 4(f) Evaluation RCTC During Final Design, and prior to Environmental Certification B-4: After Santa Ana River Bridge construction is complete, restore any River Trails Park area to before -project conditions. (NEPA / minimization measure) B-18 Appendix B, Section 4(f) Evaluation RCTC Following completion of the Santa Ana River Bridge Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project D-29 58 Appendix D. Environmental Commitments Record This page intentionally left blank. Initial Study/Environmental Assessment D-30 Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project 59 AGENDA ITEM 8C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Lisa DaSilva, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Request for Proposal to Design and Construct the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Through a Design -Build Contract WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize staff, subject to approval by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), to issue Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 16-31-057-00 and future addenda to design and construct the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project through a design -build (DB) contract; 2) Approve the selection criteria for the selection of the apparent best value (ABV) proposer; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to select the top -ranked ABV proposer for DB services, based on the criteria identified in the RFP and any addenda, and to conduct subsequent limited negotiations; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director to pay, to the shortlisted DB proposers that meet the RFP criteria, a stipend of $275,000 per proposer or a total amount not to exceed $825,000 for all shortlisted proposers after Commission award of the DB contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 1-15 Express Lanes project proposes to design and construct one to two express lanes mostly in the undeveloped median from Cajalco Road in the city of Corona to State Route 60 interchange in the cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley. Project improvements include the widening of 11 bridges, drainage tie-ins, toll collection system and infrastructure, and soundwalls. The Commission will operate and maintain the tolled express lanes after opening in 2020. Agenda Item 8C 60 Breakdown of Project Scope The core scopes of work anticipated to design, build, operate, and maintain the project are: • DB work consisting of design and construction of the civil infrastructure elements for the express lanes and the necessary tie-in work to the existing I-15 corridor; • Toll Systems Integration work (Toll Installation Work) consisting of design, installation, integration, testing, and commissioning of the tolling system. This would include development of software and hardware systems; and • Toll Operations and Maintenance (Toll 0&M) consisting of operation and maintenance of the roadside toll system (including hardware, cameras, transponder readers, etc.) and development and operation of the back office and customer service functions associated with tolling. This would include the retail distribution of toll collection transponders, toll operations, collection, and enforcement. The packaging of these scopes of work into contracts is critical in order to have best -value procurements that will consider and evaluate both the price of a proposal and its qualitative technical merits. Industry Outreach and Procurement Strategy On August 24, 2015, staff issued Request for Expressions of Interest (RFEI) No. 16-31-016-00, inviting interested firms or teams of firms to provide input on and to identify perceived risk factors related to the various procurement packaging options by submitting an expression of interest (EO1). Firms were also given the opportunity to request a one-on-one meeting to discuss the procurement packaging options with project staff. The RFEI was a due diligence effort to help staff reach a recommendation and not part of the procurement process. Interested firms were requested to comment on procurement packaging strategies, tolling technical requirements, opportunities for innovation, and risks and to provide additional comments to the procurement packaging. Staff received 26 EOIs and 25 one-on-one meeting requests. After evaluation of each request, the project team scheduled meetings with 19 firms; 10 were toll systems integrators or operators and 9 were design -builders. Subsequently, the project team hosted a one -hour industry forum to present a general overview of the project scope and funding and the three core scopes of work. One-on-one meetings commenced after the industry forum and were concluded the following day. Project team personnel participating in the meetings were comprised of representatives from Nossaman LLP, specialized legal counsel; Parsons Transportation Group, project and construction manager; and the Commission's toll and procurement staff. Agenda Item 8C 61 At the conclusion of the RFEI process, the project team evaluated the benefits and risks to the various procurement packages and concluded that two separate procurements, one for Toll Installation Work and Toll O&M (Toll Services Provider or TSP) and one for DB work, were most advantageous to the Commission with the TSP to be procured first. At its December 2015 meeting, after the Commission made a finding by two-thirds of the Commissioners that the procurement of the TSP qualifies for use of the Commission's procurement authority under the Specialized Equipment Law and the Commission's general authority of the Procurement Policy Manual, Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 16-31-042-00 was released. At the close of the RFQ period, seven TSP Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) were received and evaluated by the evaluation and selection review committee (ESRC) comprised of Commission staff. The evaluation was based on experience of both the team and key personnel and approach to the project scope. The technical advisory subcommittees made up of Commission staff and advisors reviewed the SOQs for financial and legal responsiveness and provided the results to the ESRC. Based on the evaluations and responsiveness results, the ESRC shortlisted the following four TSP firms: 1. Cofiroute USA, LLC 2. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corporation (ETC) 3. Kapsch TrafficCom Transportation NA, Inc. 4. TransCore, LP Not long after the shortlisted proposers were notified, ETC notified the Commission it would not be responding to the RFP. The final TSP RFP No. 16-31-043-00 was reviewed and approved by FHWA and Ca!trans and issued to the shortlisted firms on June 13, 2016. Proposals from the shortlisted firms are due to the Commission in October 2016. The proposals will be evaluated based on both the price and technical proposal using the ABV criteria. The following are the primary technical categories that the proposals will be reviewed for: • Project Management and Administration • Development and Design Work • Toll Collections System, Systems and Operations • Maintenance Reporting and Other Details of the evaluation are outlined in the RFP's Instructions to Proposers that was issued to the shortlisted firms. Once the ABV proposer has been selected, staff will return to the Commission for award of the contract in early 2017. Agenda Item 8C 62 DISCUSSION Design -Build Procurement In January 2016, the Commission released the DB RFQ No. 16-31-048-00 and received five SOQs. As with the TSP SOQs, the DB SOQs were evaluated by a DB ESRC comprised of Commission staff. The evaluation was based on experience of the team and key personnel and approach to project scope. Technical advisory subcommittees also reviewed the SOQs for financial and legal responsiveness and made recommendations to the ESRC. Based on the evaluations and recommendations, the ESRC shortlisted the following three DB firms: 1. Express Lane Builders, a joint venture (Coffman Specialties, Inc.; Griffith Company; and Riverside Construction Company, Inc.) 2. Flatiron West, Inc. 3. Skanska-Ames, a joint venture (Skanska USA Civil West California District, Inc. and Ames Construction, Inc.) The final DB RFP No. 16-31-057-00 was developed with Caltrans and FHWA with final approval anticipated in late July 2016. Staff requests authorization to release the final approved RFP and subsequent addenda to the DB shortlisted firms. Apparent Best Value Determination Proposals will be due to the Commission in late 2016 after the TSP has been selected. Once the proposals have been received, they will be evaluated using an ABV determination on both price and technical proposal. The ABV is based on a 100-point scale. The price score will represent up to 80 points of the total score, and the technical score will represent up to 20 points of the total score. The determination of ABV shall be based on the highest total proposal score (TPS) computed based on the following formula: TPS (maximum 100 pts.) = Price Score (maximum 80 pts.) + Technical Score (maximum 20 pts.) The price score will be calculated based on the following formula: Price Score = (PPVLow/PPV) * 80, where; PPVLow = Lowest Proposal Present Value (PPV) submitted by any proposer as determined by its fixed price, discounted monthly using a discount rate of three percent. PPV = Each proposer's PPV as determined by its fixed price, discounted monthly using a discount rate of three percent. Agenda Item 8C 63 The technical score will be calculated based on the following formula: Technical Score = (TP/TP High) * 20, where; TP = Proposer's Technical Proposal evaluation score. TP High = Highest Technical Proposal evaluation score achieved by any proposer. The technical score calculation will be based on the following primary categories: • Technical Approach • Project Delivery Approach • Quality Management Approach Additional details of the evaluation are outlined in the RFP's Instructions to Proposers that will be issued to the shortlisted firms. Once the DB ABV proposer has been selected, staff will return to the Commission for award of the contract in spring 2017. Milestone Activity TSP Procurement DB Procurement Industry review meetings (with pre -qualified teams) April 2016 Completed April 2016 Completed Issue final RFP (to shortlisted proposer) June 13, 2016 Completed August 2016 One-on-one meetings July 2016 September 2016 Final RFP addendum August 2016 December 2016 Proposal due date September 2016 January 2017 Proposal evaluation October 2016 February 2017 Selection, negotiation, and staff recommendation Winter 2016/17 Spring 2017 Committee and Commission approval of contract award Financial Close Summer 2017 Notice to Proceed for final design and construction Summer 2017 Stipends A stipend is an amount paid to unsuccessful but responsive proposers on DB procurements. Stipends are commonly used by agencies nationally to reduce costs to industry for participation in DB procurements and provide proposers partial compensation for development of technical concepts and innovations. Stipends generally cover 20-40 percent of the proposer's cost to prepare a responsive proposal/bid and allow an agency to have the right to incorporate a proposer's technical concepts and innovations into the project or elsewhere. Stipends have Agenda Item 8C 64 been found to also increase competition by allowing firms to participate due to lower proposal costs and enhance price competition by keeping proposers in the game. Stipends are not standard in the toll industry due to the lack of opportunity for innovations outside of the design and software development process. Therefore, staff is not proposing a stipend for the TSP procurement. Under 23 CFR 636.112 and 636.113, FHWA provides for federal -aid participation in stipends with certain stipulations. There is no fixed formula for stipends. Industry surveys reveal that stipends are typically found to be in the range of 0.06 percent to 0.2 percent of the DB contract value. Since the 1-15 Express Lanes project is an inside widening project with less complexity and there is no requirement to submit concept plans with the proposal, staff recommends a stipend on the lower end of the industry range. The following table summarizes stipend awards on recent, similar projects and includes the current 1-15 Express Lanes project staff recommendation. Project Location DB Contract Stipend % Notes 1-15 Express Lanes CA $266 million $275,000 o 0.10/ Concept plans not required with proposal SR-91 CIP CA $795 million $650,000 0.08% Concept plans required with proposal Sepulveda Pass CA $1.1 billion $1 million 0.09% CAHSR, CP-2 CA $1.5 billion $2 million 0.13% Highly complex engineering, but concept plans not required with proposal Gerald Desmond CA $750 million $1 million 0.13% Concept plans required with proposal Grand Parkway Toll Road TX $850 million $1 million o 0.12/ Concept plans required with proposal Grand Parkway Toll Road TX $1.3 billion $747,000 o 0.06/ USA Parkway NV $80 million $100,000 0.13% Concept plans required for 18 miles of roadway 1-15 South NV $245 million $300,000 0.12% Concept plans required; complex maintenance of traffic and interchange project with bridges Staff recommends a stipend of $275,000 to each unsuccessful proposer, which is approximately 0.10 percent of the estimated DB contract value for the 1-15 Express Lanes project. Payment of the stipend to the unsuccessful proposers will be made if their proposal is determined by the Commission to be responsive, achieves a passing score under the criteria identified in the RFP, and all other conditions of the stipend agreement included in the RFP are met. Proposers will not receive a stipend if the Commission withdraws the RFP prior to the due Agenda Item 8C 65 date. Payment of the stipend to each unsuccessful proposer will be made only after the DB contract has been awarded to the successful proposer who will not receive a stipend. Summary of Staff Recommendations Staff recommends authorization, subject to approval by Caltrans and FHWA, to issue DB RFP No. 16-31-057-00 and future addenda to design and construct the 1-15 Express Lanes project through a DB contract. Staff also requests approval of the selection criteria of the ABV proposer and authorization for the Executive Director to select the top -ranked ABV proposer for DB services, based on the criteria identified in the RFP and any addenda, and to conduct subsequent limited negotiations. Finally, staff recommends the Commission authorize the Executive Director to pay to the shortlisted DB proposers that meet the RFP criteria a stipend of $275,000 per proposer or a total amount not to exceed $825,000 for all shortlisted proposers after Commission award of the DB contract. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $825,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Highway Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: 003027 81603 00011 0000 262 31 81601 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \1414z41.4,1A Date: 06/15/2016 Agenda Item 8C 66 AGENDA ITEM 8D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2016 State Route 91 Implementation Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2016 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2002, AB 1010 authored by former Assemblyman Lou Correa allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise from the California Private Transportation Company. The purchase agreement was completed in January 2003, at a cost of $207.5 million. AB 1010 also eliminated the existing non -compete clause in the franchise agreement that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. SB 1316 passed in August 2008, authorizing the Commission to impose tolls for 50 years on transportation facilities on its portion of SR-91 and authorizing toll revenues to be used for constructing and operating toll facilities on SR-91 in Riverside County. The purchase of the 91 Express Lanes and the elimination of the non -compete clause allowed much needed improvements to be planned and implemented within the SR-91 corridor. Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, the Commission and OCTA have been coordinating these improvements. SB 1316 required creation of a new advisory committee with specific responsibilities appointed by board members from the Commission and OCTA. SB 1316 also required the continuation of annual updates of an implementation plan of SR-91 improvements for the Legislature. As spelled out in the legislation, the 2016 State Route 91 Implementation Plan was completed by OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and the Commission, and details proposed projects and completion schedules for transportation improvements to Metrolink, express bus, freeways and interchanges, new east -west highway corridors, and high-speed rail. Updates From the 2015 State Route 91 Implementation Plan The 2016 Plan provides updated descriptions, cost estimates, and schedules for projects identified in the previous plan and also contains changes in project information as follows: Agenda Item 8D 67 " The Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan has been restructured with station portions of the plan included in the revised Project 6 - Metrolink Service and Station Improvements, and with currently completed service enhancements included as Project B-6. " The WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 flyover reconstruction is included as Project A-4. " The I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector is included as a standalone project (Project 8) and was previously included as part of the Ultimate CIP (Project 9). " The EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 is included as Project A-5 and was initiated from value engineering discussions from the SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (Project 3). Attachment: 2016 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Agenda Item 8D 68 F 0 R 91 in Association with: ailtrans Tiovtiport,tion Consultim4 69 2016 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Prepared for: OCTA Prepared by: Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I SECTION 1: 2016 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2019 10 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2030 14 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2035 18 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A - POST-2035 AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS 22 SECTION 4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS 28 SECTION 5: REFERENCES 35 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN i 70 SECTION 1: 20 1 6 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE INTRODUCTION Previous law authorized the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in California. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Orange County. The four -lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of State Route 91 (SR-91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County line and State Route 55 (SR-55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehicle on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users tens of millions of hours of commuting time. While the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the SR-91 corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the California Private Transportation Company (CPTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies from adding transportation capacity or operational improvements to the SR-91 corridor through the year 2030 from Interstate 15 (1-15) in Riverside County to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties border. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. Recognizing the need to eliminate the non -compete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) (AB 1010) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much - needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers who use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Orange Counties each day. The bill allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and eliminate the existing clause that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed on January 3, 2003, placing the road in public hands at a cost of $207.5 million. With the elimination of the non -compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by OCTA, GP�IF ORHip 91 Orange County and Riverside County public officials and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) (SB 1316) was signed into law in September 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. SB 1316 also requires OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and RCTC, to issue an annual SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) and a proposed completion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR-57) to 1-15. The Plans prior to adoption of SB 1316 included a westerly project limit of SR-55. The Plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential excess toll revenue and other funds. This 2016 Plan is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Plan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2015 report, which was a major update of the previous annual Implementation Plans. This year's update includes projects that were identified in the 2006 Riverside County — Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes from the Orange/Riverside County line to 1-15 (currently under construction), the California Transportation Commission (CTC) Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and the Renewed Measure M program that provides funding for transportation projects in Orange County. The 2016 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, time frames for project packages to improve mobility on SR-91, and are listed based on a logical sequence for implementation. Project descriptions include conceptual 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 71 lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estimates (in 2016 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This Plan will provide OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans with a framework to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual Plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the Plan. PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan was approved. The 2016 Plan includes select completed project exhibits as a historical reference, see Section 4 Appendix B. Completed Construction/Improvement Projects As of June 2016, the following improvements have been constructed or implemented: • Repave and seal pavement surfaces, restripe, and replace raised channelizers on the 91 Express Lanes. • EB SR-91 restripe and median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR-71 to the Serfas Club Drive off -ramp. ❖ WB auxiliary lane extension between the County line and SR-241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County line to SR-241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehicle progression. ❖ WB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR-71 and the County line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR-71 & SR-241. ❖ Express Bus improvements are implemented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Coast Metro route and Village at Orange to Riverside/Corona. ❖ Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were improved, lanes were re -striped, illumination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. ❖ Green River Road overcrossing replacement (See Section 4). GP�IF ORHip 91 • Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station (See Section 4). • EB SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 (See Section 4). ❖ Additional SR-91 WB and EB travel lane between SR-55 and SR-241 (See Section 4). ❖ SR-91 WB bypass lane to Tustin Avenue at SR-55 (See Section 4). ❖ Metrolink Service Improvements (See Section 4). These projects provide enhanced freeway capacity and/or improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of SR-91. The completed EB SR-91 lane addition project from SR-241 to SR-71 (See Section 4) has greatly enhanced highway operations. This accounts for some of the improvement in existing EB p.m. peak hour travel time from approximately 70+ minutes in 2010 to approximately 50 minutes in 2014 (for the baseline travel time). In addition, there are two projects that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SARM) improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved Prado Dam (near SR-71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps' project, existing riverbanks have been improved due to the increased capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) compared to the previous facility capacity of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segments of the Santa Ana River to be improved are Reach 9 Phase 2A, which includes areas along SR-91 from just east of the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing to SR-71, and segments along Weir Canyon Road near Savi Ranch. SR-91 project design teams have coordinated with the Corps, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 Phase 2B by relocating the Santa Ana River. This has greatly enhanced the ability of Caltrans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps SARM Reach 9 Phase 2B improvements were under construction as of September 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "stimulus" funding and construction was finalized in April 2015. Environmental mitigation within the Santa Ana River perennial stream habitat restoration area will continue for another six years of the nine year mitigation program. 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 72 The other project with a direct impact to SR-91 is the $120 million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SARI line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and was in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI line outside of the floodplain, which is immediately adjacent to SR-91, Caltrans highway R/W was relinquished to the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the OCFCD, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate planned SR-91 improvements within the remaining State R/W subsequent to relinquishment. This project completed the construction phase in mid-2014. Completed Designs and other Reports In addition to the physical improvements in the corridor, there are various project development phase documents (Feasibility Reports, Studies, PSR, PANED, or PS&E) that are completed, or are in draft form and anticipated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide improved mobility. These documents include (also see Section 5): ❖ MIS — Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). ❖ Project Study Report "On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County" (October 2006). ❖ Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). ❖ Project Study Report for SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (December 2006). ❖ RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan (December 2006). ❖ SR-91 Feasibility Study from SR-57 to SR-55 (June 2009). ❖ SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study (December 2009). ❖ Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report (August 2010). ❖ Renewed Measure M Early Action Plan, approved August 2007 and subsequently renamed as the Capital Action Plan (April 2011). ❖ PSR-PDS for SR-241/SR-91 Connector (January 2012). ❖ PS&E for Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) Project (2014). • PSR-PDS on SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 (October 2014). Updates from the 2015 SR-91 Implementation Plan In addition to the improvements and progress noted above, the following items that were included in the 2015 SR-91 Implementation Plan have been modified for the 2016 Plan update: • Various project descriptions, costs, and schedules have been updated from the 2015 Plan based on continued project development. ❖ Project schedules have been revised within the horizon year timelines. The 2025 horizon year is updated to 2030. ❖ The Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan has been restructured with station portions of the plan included in the revised Project 6 - Metrolink Service and Station Improvements, and with currently completed service enhancements included as Project B-6 (see Appendix B). ❖ The WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 flyover reconstruction (Option 1 in the PSR-PDS) is included as Project A-4. ❖ The I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector is included as a standalone project (Project 8) and was previously included as part of the Ultimate CIP (Project 9). ❖ The EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 is included as Project A-5 and was initiated from value engineering discussions from the SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (Project 3). SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segment of SR-91 from west of the junction of SR-57 and SR-91 in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, to east of the junction of SR-91 and 1-15 in the City of Corona in Riverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and includes approximately 12.7 miles within Orange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Riverside County. 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 73 Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic conditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carrying capacity of the facility is inadequate to accommodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is defined as a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/mile. The results also indicate that there are several physical constraints that generate unacceptable traffic queues. The following list summarizes the deficiencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: ❖ Heavy traffic volumes from 1-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91. The weaving and merging condition is complicated by the close proximity of the Westbound (WB) Main Street off -ramp. ❖ High demand from several on -ramps within the eastern segment exacerbates traffic conditions during peak hours. ❖ High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. A significant number of this traffic is redirected (balanced) traffic trying to bypass mainline congestion. ❖ One of the two EB lanes from The Eastern Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) is dropped at the merge to State Route 91 (SR-91), causing additional congestion in the EB direction. ❖ Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing WB and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. EB truck traffic must make two lane changes to stay on EB SR-91. ❖ SR-55 merges with SR-91. An EB lane on SR-91 is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Imperial Highway creating a weave condition. ❖ WB SR-91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR-55, which contributes to mainline congestion. This drop also occurs on the left-hand side of SR-91 as opposed to the typical right-hand connector exit. ❖ High demand from Weir Canyon Road, Imperial Highway and Lakeview Avenue increases delay during the peak hours. ❖ WB traffic entering SR-91 at Lakeview Avenue to southbound (SB) SR-55 contributes to mainline congestion by weaving through three lanes on WB c WE"ORHip 91 SR-91. ❖ The existing two lane connector from WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 is over capacity. • There is a trap lane from EB SR-91 that terminates at SB SR-241 which creates a chokepoint in the area. PROJECT SUMMARY Many of the highway projects and concepts identified in this 2016 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS as well as through subsequent project development. Table 1 summarizes the various pending, potential concepts, and completed projects in the 2016 Plan, and they are outlined below by implementation/construction schedule (see Section 2 for detailed pending projects, Section 3 Appendix A for concept project summaries, and Section 4 Appendix B for completed project summaries): ❖ The first set of projects is anticipated to be completed by 2019 and includes three improvements at a total cost of approximately $1.6 billion. The projects include the Initial SR-91 CIP that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green River Rd, add collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at I-15/SR-91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and provide system/local interchange improvements; Express Bus service improvements; and a State Route 241 (SR-241)/ 91 Express Lanes connector. These projects are in the process of final design, construction, or procurement and implementation, as noted in the project summaries. ❖ Three projects for implementation by 2030 include the interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91, SR-91 widening improvements between SR-57 and SR-55, and Metrolink service and station improvements. OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans have initiated preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Some of the 2030 projects are funded and underway in various stages of project development. Projects for implementation by 2030 would cost approximately $633 million to $1.13 billion. 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 4 74 V' Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer -lead time projects and include a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; the I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector; and the Ultimate SR-91 CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR- 241 to Green River Road and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15. V' Long-range concepts for potential Post-2035 implementation (potentially earlier if funding becomes available) in Appendix A include an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR- 241 to 1-15, the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail, the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241/ SR- 133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B), the WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Improvements, and the EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241. This multi -billion dollar potential concept program requires a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. In some cases, these concepts may include previous projects as components, such that all concepts within this summary may not be implemented. Traffic Analysis For the 2016 Plan, the traffic analysis for major SR-91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2015 Plan. This analysis used the latest freeway operations software model available from UC Berkeley and traffic data calibrated to reflect new traffic patterns since the 2015 Plan. This freeway operations model provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists compared to traditional travel demand models. The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models. This approach is especially important given high SR-91 traffic volumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic. For example, a minor freeway merging area can cause many vehicles to slow, cascading delay through the traffic stream, and suddenly both speed and volume rapidly decrease for major segments of the freeway. GP��IF ORH,p 91 Table 1  SR-91 Implementation Plan Projects Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) Projects By Year 2019 1 Initial Phase CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in 1,407 Each Direction East of Green River Rd, CD Roads and I-15/SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System/Local Interchange Improvements (2017) 2 Express Bus Service Improvements Between Orange 6 County and Riverside County (2017) 3 SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (2019) 180 SUBTOTAL 1,593 Projects By Year 2030 4 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements (2023) 5 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 (2025) 6 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements (2030) SUBTOTAL 123.4 221-718 289.2 633  1,130 Projects By Year 2035 7 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements (Post-2030) 8 I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector (By 2035) 9 Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71 and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 (2035) SUBTOTAL 76.8 130 TBD 207+ Appx. A Concept Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) A-1 Concepts By Post-2035 and Conceptual Projects Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 (Post-2035) A-2 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail (Post-2035) 2,720 2,770  3,200 A-3 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from 8,855 SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (Post-2035) A-4 WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Improvements (Post-2035) A-5 EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 31 SUBTOTAL 75  150 14,451  14,956 Appx. B Completed Project Summary Since 2006 (Constructed Year) Cost ($M) B-1 Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement (March 24.3 2009) B-2 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking 25 Structure (June 2009) B-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 51.2 (September 2010) B-4 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 85.2 5th GP Lane in Each Direction (January 2013) B-5 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue (April 2016) 45.2 B-6 Metrolink Service Improvements (June 2016) 249 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 5 75 The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for WB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the following major capacity enhancing projects: ❖ New SR-91 WB/EB lanes from SR-71 to 1-15 by 2017 (Initial CIP, Project 1). ❖ SR-241/91 Express Lanes connector with lanes to Coal Canyon on SR-91 by 2019 (Project 3). ❖ SR-91 EB lane between SR-57 and SR-55 by 2025 (Project 5). ❖ New I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector by 2035 (Project 8). ❖ New SR-91 WB/EB lanes, various segments, from SR-241 to 1-15 by 2035 (Ultimate CIP, Project 9). The WB morning (a.m.) traffic analysis results indicate that for the year 2019 forecasts, travel times in Riverside and Orange Counties are anticipated to improve significantly (by about 15 minutes) due to the inclusion of the Initial Phase of the CIP (Project 1), though bottlenecks are anticipated at the Orange -Riverside County line and at the SR-241 interchange. A minor bottleneck is shown at the SR-55 interchange. The main bottlenecks in Riverside County have decreased because of the completion of proposed projects (including the Initial Phase of the CIP), though some congestion is still forecasted. In the year 2030 forecast, WB bottlenecks occur at the Orange - Riverside County line, at the SR-241 interchange, and at the SR-55 interchange. This results in an increase in travel time, mostly within Riverside County from about 21 minutes in 2019 to about 45 minutes in 2030. Assuming Corridor A and the ICE are not constructed by 2035, bottlenecks appear just east of the SR-71 interchange, at the SR-241 interchange, and at the SR-55 interchange. With completion of the ultimate CIP project, Riverside County travel times improve dramatically with reduction to below 2019 levels (about 15 minutes). For all forecast horizon years, travel times in Orange County remain relatively unchanged between Existing (2015) and 2035 with the exception that there is about a 5 minute travel time savings with implementation of projects in 2019, and a 5 minute increase for 2030. A project to address the operational aspects for the WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 movement is included this year (see Concept A-4) in addition to exploring by OCTA of multi -modal opportunities on, or adjacent to, the SR-91 corridor that could relieve congestion. The EB evening (p.m.) traffic analysis indicates that for the year 2019 forecasts, bottlenecks are shown just before the SR-55 interchange, at the Orange -Riverside County line, and just before the Main Street interchange. Implementation of Project 1, the Initial Phase of the CIP, results in decreased Riverside County corridor travel times from approximately 21 minutes to under 10 minutes. In the year 2030 forecast, EB bottlenecks are still shown west of the SR-55 interchange at the Orange -Riverside County line, and just before the Main Street interchange. The queuing in Riverside County has largely decreased because of the completion of proposed projects, and corridor travel times are forecast to be less than existing conditions through 2035. For the 2035 horizon year, bottlenecks appear at SR-55, at SR-241, and just before the Main Street interchange. The 2035 travel times remain consistently low for EB SR-91 in Riverside County but gradually increase (to an additional 19 minutes) in Orange County. Figures 1-1 and 1-2 below show the existing (2015) and horizon year corridor travel times by County. 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6 76 Figure 1-1 — Mainline Westbound SR-91 from 1-15 to SR-57 A.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time (Minutes) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Existing (2015) 2019 2030 ❑ Orange County ❑ Riverside County 2035 Figure 1-2 — Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to 1-15 P.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time (Minutes) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Existing (2015) 2019 2030 2035 ❑Orange County ❑Riverside County ICE STATUS SUMMARY The ICE concept (see Concept A-3) was conceived as part of the MIS and was established as part of a suite of projects to support future peak demand volumes between Riverside and Orange Counties. The ICE was further evaluated in 2009 for financial and geotechnical feasibility. Seven (7) primary feasibility issues were considered: ❖ Geologic, hydrogeologic/hydrologic, and geotechnical conditions. ❖ Corridor concepts (full tunnel and partial tunnel/partial surface road). • Tunnel configuration. • Tunnel excavation and support methods. • Tunnel systems (e.g. ventilation, emergency fire system, operation building, toll system, etc.). ❖ Construction considerations. ❖ Construction, Operation & Maintenance (0&M) costs. 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 7 77 At the conclusion of the financial and geotechnical feasibility study in 2010, the Riverside -Orange Corridor Authority Board (ROCA) directed staff to shelve the project due to its high construction cost and the difficult economic climate, and to reevaluate the concept on an annual basis during the preparation of the SR-91 Implementation Plan. The National Forest Service has continued monitoring of the ground water level along the preliminary alignment of the tunnel and has not found any significant changes since 2010. The technological ability to construct the large -diameter tunnels is currently available; however, the cost of tunnel boring machines (TBM) required to construct this project has not been reduced significantly. In general, no significant changes to the seven feasibility issues considered for the ICE concept have occurred over the last six years. Conclusion An assessment of current economic conditions, lack of state and federal transportation funding; and the high construction cost is hampering the ability of OCTA and RCTC to implement this concept. Until considerable advancements are made in regards to efficient and affordable tunneling technology, and more state and federal funding are made available, the concept will remain a challenge to implement. 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8 78 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OVERVIEW The 2016 Plan describes projects, implementation schedules, key consideration, benefits, and costs (in 2016 dollars, or as noted) for major projects and concepts through Post-2035. Many of the projects and concepts identified in this Implementation Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS and subsequent updates. The schedules for implementation of the packages of projects include 2019, 2030, and 2035. The 2019 projects are capable of being implemented through the project development process with minimal to moderate environmental constraints or are under construction. Some of the longer -range projects for 2030 and 2035 require more significant planning and environmental assessment prior to design. Each of the project or concept improvements includes an estimate of project schedules. It is important to note that implementing various time saving measures, such as design -build or contractor incentives for early completion, may potentially reduce project schedules. The implementation phases are defined as follows: FULL TON PLACENTIA caoroRNA 91 ❖ Conceptual Engineering = Pre -Project Study Report (Pre-PSR) — Conceptual planning and engineering for project scoping and feasibility prior to initiating the PSR phase. • Preliminary Engineering = Project Study Report (PSR) — Conceptual planning and engineering phase that allows for programming of funds. ❖ Environmental = Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) — The detailed concept design that provides environmental clearance for the project and programs for final design and right of way acquisition. The duration for this phase is typically 2-3 years. ❖ Design = Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) — Provide detailed design to contractors for construction bidding and implementation. ❖ Construction = The project has completed construction and will provide congestion relief to motorists. The intent of these Implementation Plan project packages is to provide an action list for OCTA, RCTC and Caltrans to pursue in the project development process or for initiating further studies. Figure 2-1 — SR-91 Project Study Area from SR-57 to 1-15 YORBA LINDA 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 79 PROJECTS BY YEAR 20 1 9 The first set of projects will be completed by 2019 and includes three (3) improvements at a total cost of approximately $1.6 billion (in 2016 dollars, or as noted). The projects include the Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green River Rd, add collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at I-15/SR-91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and provide system/local interchange improvements; Express Bus service improvements; and a SR-241/ 91 Express Lanes connector. Further details for each of the projects are included following the summary below. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 1 Initial Phase CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of Green River Rd, CD Roads and I-15/SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to I-15 and System/Local Interchange Improvements (2017) 1,407 2 Express Bus Service Improvements (2017) 6 3 SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (2019) 180 SUBTOTAL 1,593 FULLTON ca��ronHiy 91 PLACENTIA ' Figure 2-2 — Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2019 ANAH EI M \ Bernardino 11 CHINO I� HILLS 11 \\ I NORCO CORONA a' 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 10 80 Initial Phase CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP lane In Each Direction East of Green River Road, CD Roads and I-151SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System f Local Interchange Improvements Project No: 'I Anticipated Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate* Total Capital Cost Support Cost Total Project Cost $ 1,161,000,000 $ 246,000,000 $ 1,407,000,000 Project Schedule** Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed Completed 2013-2017 * Cost obtained for Initial Phase is from RCTC (2014 dollars) ** Schedule for Inital Phase; subsequent phase for Ultimate Project anticipated in 2035 (see Project #10) LEGEND Existing Highway i Interchange/Ramp County Line ■ • ■ Coal Canyon Crossing p HOU Lane ATolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane CD Road Auxiliary Lane * Braided Connector a Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project [CIP], from SR-241 to Pierce Street, includes the addition of a 5th general purpose lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, additional lanes at the SR-711SR-91 interchange (Project #4), and collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the I-151SR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EBIVVB)II-15 (SB/NB) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-15/SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15/Cajalco Road, and northerly to 1-15/Hidden Valley Parkway. An Express Lanes ingress/egress lane is also planned near the County Line. Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase with reduced improvements to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. The following is a summary of the deferred ultimate improvements: 1-151SR-91 median North Direct Connector (Project #10), and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway (Project #9); general purpose lanes and Express Lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street; and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71. The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project with an anticipated completion in 2020. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the SR-711SR-91 Interchange (Project #4), the SR-241f91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #3), and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project. Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street, along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south, and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operations will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in Fall 2012. A Design -Build contractor was selected in May 2013 and construction activities began in early 2014 for the Initial Phase. The project is anticpated to open to traffic in Spring 2017. Off Coal Canyon Crossing Ingress/Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes by restriping County Line Green River Rd On Off Off Auto Center Dr Maple St t�1 On' Off" from to Auto On Maple 5t Center Dr i Off i affA to Maple St Seifas Club Dr On' from 5urfas Club Dry Off Lincoln Av On On Off On Off to Main y St 3-Lane CD Road Connector from Main St EB on -ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp Main St Off to VP 1-15 On From On NB From 1-15 SB 1-15 Off On` On* From From Main SB St 1-15 Off to NB/SB 1-15 HOWHOT lanes to I-151Ontario Av McKinley St Pierce St On Off From NB I 1-15 Off On T� O p On Off y — Additional lane by restripe of existing lanes 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 81 11 Express Bus Service Improvements Project No: 2 Anticipated Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate* Total Annual Capital Cost Total Annual Operating Cost Project Schedule Riverside/Corona to Anaheim Resort Temecula to Village at Orange Village at Orange to Riverside/Corona Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro $ 1,000,000** $ 5,000,000** FY 2017 (Planned RTA Route 200) FY 2017 (Planned RTA Route 205) Existing (RTA Route 216) Existing (OCTA Route 794) Capital and Operating costs from OCTA and RCTC (2015 dollars) **20-year average Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), plans an expansion of Express Bus service between Riverside and Orange counties. Commuters lack direct transit connections to some Orange County employment centers, and new Express Bus service can provide this connection. Existing Service OCTA has operated Route 794 since 2006 from Riverside County to Hutton Centre and South Coast Metro (shown in orange below). RTA has operated Route 216 since 2010 between the Village at Orange and Downtown Riverside (shown in red below). New Service Two new Express Bus routes are planned for implementation by Fiscal Year 2017 between Riverside County and Orange County including RTA route 200 (shown in blue below) from Riverside County to Corona and to the Anaheim Resort. The route would include three AM and three PM roundtrips by three buses. RTA route 205 (shown in green below) from Temecula to the Village at Orange is proposed to include two AM and two PM roundtrips by 2 buses. Existing RTA route 216 (shown in red below) from the Riverside Downtown Terminal to the Village at Orange is planned for expansion of service from the current two buses to four buses by Fiscal Year 2023. Upon completion of the proposed 91 Express Lanes, ROTC expects RTA to nearly double Express Bus service on SR-91. Currently, OCTA operates 15 bus trips per day on SR-91 and, based on expansion of ridership, RCTC envisions RTA adding 20 additional trips, eventually bringing the total to 35 daily trips. Service duration for this expansion will increase by 11,500 hours per year and will be served by five new RTA coaches to be procured specifically for this service, and RTA will add five more coaches by 2017. Key Considerations Operating costs will average $5,000,000 each year and capital costs will average $1,000,000 per year. The cost sharing will be negotiated between Orange and Riverside counties. RCTC is committing 55,000,000 primarily for Express Bus purchases once the Riverside County portion of the 91 Express Lanes open. Intercounty Express Bus service is effective between locations where transit travel times by Express Bus would be more competitive than Metrolink and connecting rail feeder buses. There is some duplication of service behveen the existing Express Bus routes and Metrolink service. One reason customers are attracted to Express Bus service over Metrolink is that the cost is approximately 33% lower. There may be some merit to subsidizing Metrolink fares for price -sensitive transit riders in this corridor instead of keeping competitive bus service. Benefits Development of Express Bus services will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status A cooperative agreement covering the Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro service with Riverside County has been developed. The Riverside County to South Coast Metro Express Bus route is currently operating. Expansion of the program is dependent upon available operating funds and future financial commitments with Riverside County. The implementation dates may change based on funding availabil ity. FULLE•TON PLACENTIA aiacenua Anaheim Resort CP4lf ORNrp 91 Y orua Linda YORBA LINDA ANAHEIM Village at Orange I VdI❑ To South Coast Metro To Riverside To Temecula 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 12 82 SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector Project No: 3 Anticipated Completion: 2019 Project Cost Estimate" Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction $ 1E10,000,000 Completed 2012-2017 2017-2019 * Assumes a 2-lane connector, extending as far as Coal Canyon_ Costs from State Route 241 191 Connector Fact Sheet (10/28/2014 LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp County Line Coal Canyon Crossing Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Project #1 Improvements Onr um Canyon Rd Cr On Off On County Line Project Description The SR-241/91 Express Lanes connector will carry northbound (NB) SR-241 traffic to eastbound (EB) 91 Express Lanes and carry westbound (WB) 91 Express Lanes traffic to southbound (SB) SR-241. Outside widening would be required mainly on the south side of SR-91 for realignment of EB lanes up to the Goal Canyon Crossing_ Key Considlerations This project was originally permitted as a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) connector into the SR-91 HOV lane. With the implementation of the 91 Express Lanes, the project will need to carefully coordinate the traffic operations and tolling policies that will result with the convergence of the SR-241 tall road, the existing OCTA 91 Express Lanes, and the proposed extension of the 91 Express Lanes by ROTC_ The project will follow the SR-91 CIP (Project #1) in its implementation and will need to be designed accordingly_ Continuous operations of the 91 Express Lanes will be a key consideration for this project_ The preliminary analysis calls for the SR-91 center median to be widened to the south to make room for a two lane (one in each direction) direct connector and associated Express Auxilliary Lanes in each direction. The project would tie into the SR-91 GIP improvements at Coal Canyon. Benefits The project will provide connectivity from the 91 Express Lanes and the SR-241 Eastern Transportation Corridor System_ The project improves access to SR-241 and South County for traffic that does not currently utilize the 91 Express Lanes, which also improves WB SR-91 by eliminating the need for HOB! and Express Lane users to weave across four general purpose lanes to use the existing SB SR-241 connector. It will help alleviate congestion through the corridor by allowing SR-241 and 91 Express Lanes users to bypass the existing 241f91 general purpose connectors. Coal Canyon Grossing Ingress/Egress lanes shown within Express Lanes by restriping (Project #1) Current Status Preliminary engineering concepts for a SR-241/91 Express Lanes direct connector have been developed by The FoothilUEastem Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) and Caltrans_ The 91 Express Lanes Extension and SR-241 Connector Feasibility Study was completed in March 2409 and was initiated to evaluate the various alternatives. A Project Study Report was initiated in January 2011 and was completed by January 2012. The Project Report and Environmental Document is anticipated to be completed by mid-2017. 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 13 83 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2030 Projects for implementation by 2030 include the interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91, SR-91 widening improvements between SR-57 and SR-55, and Metrolink service and station improvements. Some of the 2030 projects are funded and underway in various stages of project development. OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans have initiated preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. Projects for implementation by 2030 are expected to cost approximately $633 million to $1.1 billion (in 2016 dollars, or as noted). Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 4 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements (2023) 123.4 5 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 (2025) 221-718 6 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements (2030) 289.2 SUBTOTAL 633 —1,130 Figure 2-3 — Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2030 FULL ei n» TON PL CENTIA s r- f ® ,rK1LLA P PARK RANq YORBA LINUA 7 ANAHEIM `� Bernardino It CHINO m HILLS '1I i N `— L, \ NORCO CORONA e i Y F' Foelry,, . ` Q ca��ronH,,y 91 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 14 84 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements Project No: 4 Anticipated Completion: 2023 Project Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost $ 123,397,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed Completed 2021-2023 * Cost obtained from preliminary engineer's cost estimate (2011 dollars) LEGEND Existing Highway - Interchange/Ramp - County Line ■ • ■ Coal Canyon Crossing ® Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane CD Road Auxiliary Lane _ _ Project #1 and #3 Improvements Project Description The current project includes a new two-lane direct connector flyover from eastbound (EB) SR-91 to northbound (NB) SR-71 and modifications to the existing Green River Road EB SR-91 on -ramp. Key Considerations Project improvements must be coordinated with the following projects: the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) (Project #1 and #9) and the SR-241191 Express Lanes Connector (Project #3). The Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement was completed in March 2009 (see Appendix B Project No. B-1 ) and consisted of replacing the previously existing Green River Road Overcrossing with a new six -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate widening of SR-91 by Projects #1, #3, and #9. The SR-91 CIP (Project #1 and #9) project design -build team began construction activities in early 2014. The Project Report and Environmental Document for the SR-241/91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #3) is anticipated to be completed by early 2017. Close coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife will also be required as the connector crosses the Santa Ana River below the Prado Dam. In addition, implementation of Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) within the median of SR-91 will require the need for a three -level crossing of SR-91 and the proposed SR-71 direct flyover connector. Benefits The project will provide a new direct connector improvement from EB SR-91 to NB SR-71, replacing the geometric choke point created by the existing connector. The project will also improve traffic operations and operational efficiency by eliminating or minimizing weaving conflicts through the use of auxiliary lanes. Current status The environmental phase was completed in June 2011. Final design was completed in 2015. Construction is deferred to 2021-2023 pending funding availability. Ingress/Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes by restriping by Project #1 Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off Off Lanes shown are for the SR-241191 Express Lanes Project #3 l�t Coal Canyon Crossing County Line Lane shown is for Project #1 (Typical) Green River Rd On A Off On I _Lima 0-On Off On rf On from Green River Rd Auto Center Dr On from On ^ Maple St Off 1 Off 41/1° Off to Maple St Serfas Club Dr 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 85 15 SR-91 Improvements between SR-57 and SR-55 Project No: 5 Anticipated Completion: 2025 Project Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost, Low* $ 221,000,000 Total Project Cost, High* $ 718,000,000 Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed 2015-2018 2019-2021 2022-2025 Project Costs from SR-91 PSRIPDS (2014 dollars). Cost Range is for reduced shoulder Alternative 2A (low) and full standard Alternative 2B with Option 1 (high) (excludes support costs). LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp p HOV Lane Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane State College Blvd On Off On Off On Off Project Description Improve the SR-571SR-91 interchange complex, including nearby local interchanges, as well as adding freeway capacity between SR-55 and SR-57. Some improvements to NB SR-57 may be considered and will be further analyzed. In addition, a reconfigured WB on -ramp from Lakeview Av would be located between realigned WB SR-91 lanes and the SB SR-55 auxiliary lanes. Specific improvements will be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. The improvements shown are from the concepts developed by the SR-91 PSR-PDS from SR-57 to SR-55. The improvements for Alternative 2A include one EB GP lane from east of SR-57 to west of the SR-55 connector. One WB GP lane is added from west of the Kraemer Blvd/Glassell St interchange to State College Blvd. A NB SR-57 C-D road is proposed for Orangethorpe Av with a shared exit for the NB-57 to WB SR-91 connector. The need for this C-❑ road is being reevaluated during the environmental phase. Alternative 2B is the same as Alternative 2A with the exception of a proposed standard left shoulder width of 10 feet in both directions. Additonal options are being considered for WB SR-91 that include the addition of the fourth lane to be added from the NB SR-57 or SB SR-57 connectors and either terminating at State College Blvd or Raymond Av - East St. Key Considerations The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 may require right-of-way acquisition. A non-standard geometric cross-section will minimize the number of acquisitions. Benefits The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 include, among other features, adding one EB general purpose lane to achieve lane balancing. The project improvement will alleviate congestion and reduce delay. Current Status The project improvement for EB SR-91 widening and for improvements to SR-571SR-91 and SR-551SR-91 were studied by the SR-91 Feasibility Study, which was completed in June 2009. Preliminary engineering was completed in 2014 and the Environmental phase began in early 2015. The proposed improvements are included in the Measure M2 program through the Environmental phase. SR-57 Kraemer Blvd Off On Off EB SR-91 at Kraemer Blvd interchange improvements Off On Glassell St WB On -Ramp Location Off to Tustin Av WB SR-91 Off OnTustin Av On Off Off Lakeview Av On On Off 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 16 86 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements Project No: 6 Anticipated Completion: 2030 Project Cost Estimate* Anaheim Canyon Station Cost Placentia Station Cost Total OCTA Costs Project Schedule To be completed by 2030 * Costs from OCTA and RCTC (in 2016 dollars) $ 21,000,000 $ 23,420,000 $ 44,420,000 Project Description This long term plan improves access to Metrolink stations, facilitating future service improvements. The Anaheim Canyon Station improvement project includes the addition of a second station track, platform, extensions of the existing platform, and associated passenger amenities, including ticket vending machines, benches, canopies, and signage. The project is anticipated to move forward with OCTA as the lead agency on all phases of project development, including environmental. The proposed Placentia Metrolink Station improvements include platforms and parking that will be located on BNSF Railway and City of Placentia right of way. OCTA is the lead for design and construction of the project. Key Considerations Coordination has been ongoing with the Metrolink extension studies for the Anaheim Canyon and Placentia Station improvements. Benefits Enables development of expanded Metrolink service and improves efficiency, which will contribute to congestion relief on S R-91 Current Status OCTA staff continues to work with the City to define the Anaheim Canyon Station project in a project definition report (PDR). A final version of the PDR was sent to the City on December 22, 2014, for signature. OCTA anticipates releasing a request for proposals for a consultant to perform the environmental and preliminary design, once the City approves and signs the PDR. A cooperative agreement with the City is in place for the project defining roles and responsibilities. Plans for the Placentia Station platforms, station amenities, and parking are 95 percent complete. However, finalization of the design is on hold pending the outcome of the City of Placentia's negotiations with private developers for a possible transit -oriented development on city -owned property where a surface parking lot was planned to be constructed. A new cooperative agreement with the City for construction of the station will need to be presented to the Board for approval once the City has a signed an agreement with the developer. The City of Placentia is 90 percent complete with demolishing a packing house on the site for construction of the southern station platform. -' Anaheim Cnyon Station °wool, PPIIIR1111 91117111i.10.11111filli THE CRLISSII S ■.y I r (MANSIT MINTED CEELPRIEW) ARNIOCNED 1NACK SCUMS MGM TRACK BRIDGE (TO RE REMOVE!, .NEW 9ECOAi] PLATFIX. PROPOSED NO_ 2➢TURNOUT Image source: Anaheim Canyon Station Project Definition Report February 23, 2015 • _� GEC SERVICE FACITIY I� I �IJ PLATFORM ACCESS PRCPDS EC AWN TRACK (hTF-2) L E%ISIING MAIN TRACK 1 (NT-1) 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17 87 PROJECTS BY YEAR 203 5 Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer -lead time projects and include a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; an I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector; and the Ultimate SR-91 CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to Green River Road and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 7 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements (Post-2030) 76.8 8 I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector (by 2035) 130 9 Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 (2035) TBD SUBTOTAL 207+ Figure 2-4 — Summary of Projects for Implementation by 2035 FUL TON PLACENTIA P3ac�rrn� - YORBA LINDA ANAHEIM Bernardino N.N N, CHINO HILLS CORONA NORCO 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 18 88 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements Project No: 7 Anticipated Completion: Post-2030 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 67,800,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 76,800,000 Completed TB ❑ TB ❑ TBD TB D Costs from Feasibility Study (2009 dollars). RAN cost is undetermined at this time. Cost does not include potential impact to Santa Ana River. LEGEN❑ - Existing Highway - Interchange/Ramp m HOV or HOT Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane On Os Os Os Os ❑n Project Description The project would provide a new interchange with SR-91 at Fairmont Boulevard. On and off ramps will connect Fairmont Boulevard from the north to eastbound (EB) and westbound (WB) SR-91. The proposed interchange does not include a vehicular Fairmont Boulevard connection to Santa Ana Canyon Road to the south. A pedestrian/bicycle connection is also proposed between La Palma Avenue and Santa Ana Canyon Road. This bridge and pathway will allow for direct Santa Ana River Trail access from both Anaheim south of SR-91 and from Yorba Linda. Key Considerations Interchange spacing and weaving issues (to SR-55) need to be evaluated. Widening of SR-91 may be needed to accommodate interchange ramps. Proximity of the Santa Ana River may require that the WB ramp junction be located north of the river. New connection requirements and interchange spacing needs to be considered. Ramp and bridge placement needs to take pedestrian/bicycle bridge into account, or incorporate the pedestrian/bike path into the design beyond the vehicular access limits of the project. Benefits The interchange is expected to relieve congestion at Imperial Highway (SR-90), Lakeview Avenue, and Weir Canyon Road Interchanges. Preliminary traffic modeling shows a 10-15°Io decrease in volumes at Weir Canyon and SR-90 interchanges with the interchange alternative. Current Status The City of Anaheim completed a conceptual engineering study in December 2009 for the interchange. Multiple alternatives have been developed as part of the conceptual engineering study. Bicycle/pedestrian bridge is currently in initial planning stages. Project development is pending funding identification. OCTA is currently studying multiple conceptual alternatives for intermediate access to the 91 Express Lanes. Alternatives may include different ingress and egress options near Fairmont Boulevard. Results of the analysis are expected by the end of summer 2016. The Implementation Plan will be updated as necessary in the future with study results. ❑n Off Fairmont Blvd Off Os Os os Os On 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 19 89 1-75/SR-91 North Direct Connector Project No: 8 Anticipated Completion: By 2035 Project Gast Estimate" Total Project Cost $ 130,000,000 Project Schedule"" Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction 2020-2023 2020-2023 TB❑ • Cost from ROTC (2010 Dollars) LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp ® HOY or HOT Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane _ _ -I Project #1 and #4 Improvements * Braided Connector Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, recommended the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, and the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-151SR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (ROTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EBANB)11-15 (SB/NB) Express Lanes median direct connectors and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-15/SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15JCajalco Road and northerly to I-151Hidden Valley Parkway. Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase (Project #1), with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. Subsequently, the proposed 1-15fSR-91 median North Direct Connector improvements (the subject project), have been pulled out from the CIP as a standalone project to be implemented prior to the Ultimate CIP (Project #9)_ Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specificallly, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Initial CIP (Project #1) and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project. Benefits The 1-151SR-91 North Direct Connector project will reduce congestion and operational delays by providing direct median -to -median access between SR-91 and 1-15 HOT lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use the Express Lanes Connector for a fee in exchange for time savings_ Current Status Concept level engineering is complete as a component of the CIP project, but will be revisited at a future date as a standalone project. The Ultimate CIP Project, which includes the 1-15/SR-91 North Direct Connector, is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012_ However, a separate standalone environmental document will be prepared_ Express lane extends to Green River Rd (Project #1) Lanes shown are for the SR-711SR-91 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR-71, and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 (Project #4) Off Off Auto Center Or h On i On' o Series Club Dr Lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On -Ramp (Project #4) Maple St Off` A Off 1 1 On' HOVIHOT lanes to 1-15.Nidden Valley Pkwy Lincoln Av Main St Off On On t Off On On A I On I III 3-Lane CD Road from Main St EB On -Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp (Project #1) to NBISB 1-15 5 On From SB 1-15 HOVNOT lanes to 1-16JCajalco Rd (by ROTC 1-15 CIP:) McKinley St A off From NB 1-15 Pierce St Off On Ti it� 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 90 20 Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 Project No: 9 Anticipated Completion: 2035 Project Cost Estimate* To Be Determined Project Schedule" Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed Completed TBD * Schedule for Ultimate Project anticipated by 2035 LEGEND i Existing Highway - Interchange/Ramp - County Line -" Coal Canyon Crossing WM NOV Lane Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Auxiliary Lane Project #1, #3, #4 and #8 Improvements * Braided Connector _ J r Off Lanes shown are for the SR-241191 Express Lanes Connector (Project #3) Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, recommended the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, and the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-15/SR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's {ROTC} 10 Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EBIWB)11-15 (SB/NB) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-15ISR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15/Cajalco Road (now part of RCTC 1-15 CIP), and northerly to I-151Hidden Valley Parkway (now part of Project #8). Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase (Project #1), with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. The following is a summary of the proposed ultimate GIP improvements: SR-91 general purpose lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street; and SR-91 general purpose lanes from SR-241 to Green River Road. Ultimate project widens all SR-91 lanes to full standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71. These Ultimate improvements are the subject of this project. The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project with an anticipated completion date in 2020. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Initial CIP (Project #1), the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #4), the SR-241191 Express Lanes Connector (Project #3), SR-9111-15 median North Direct Connector and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway (Project #8), and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project. Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street and along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operation will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of C❑ roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete but may need to be revisited at a future date. The Ultimate Project is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012. Existing bike path will be preserved Off Coal Canyon Crossing County Line Green River Rd On ^ Off Off Lanes shown are for the SR-711SR-91 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR-71, and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 (Project #4) Off Ultimate project widens all SR-91 lanes to standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71 Off T Auto Center Dr Maple St Lincoln Av On i 4,: 1 On Off Cfr Off' On' Serfas Club Dr Lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On -Ramp (Project #4) Main St On of Off On Off On ^Off On tll On Dff Dff On Off � On* V From Main St 3-Lane CD Road from Main St EB On -Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp (Project #1) HOWHOT lanes to 1-15/Hidden Valley Pkwy (Project #8) On On* From SB 1-15 Off 4 McKinley St Pierce St Off to NB/SB 1-15 13 On On Off From From SB NB 1-15 1-15 HOVIHOT lanes to 1-15/CajalCO Rd {by RCTC 1-15 CIP) Off On On Off �P,,IF�RMf� 91 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 91 21 SECTION 3: APPENDIXA- PosT-2035 AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS Concepts for potential Post-2035 implementation (potentially earlier if funding becomes available) focus on longer -lead time projects. This multi -billion dollar program may include: an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15; the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail; the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B), WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Connector Improvements, and EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 These potential concepts include significant environmental constraints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. The MIS Corridor A concept may incorporate projects being developed in the earlier programs as concept components. Appendix Concept No. Concept Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) A-1 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 (Post-2035) 2,720 A-2 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail (Post-2035) 2,770-3,200 A-3 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (Post-2035) 8,855 A-4 WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Connector Improvements (Post-2035) 75-150 A-5 EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 31 SUBTOTAL 14,451-14,956 Figure 3-1 — Summary of Concepts for Post-2035 Implementation FULL ei m TON PLACENTIA Piacenoa rba LI{1da Yolba LIntla BIva RANCq�� ,y4.LA ;PARK YORBA LINDA ANAHEIM ` Bernardino 411 CHINO \�\ HILLS 11 44 �\ I ,.1 • NORCO . . ... CORONA , L _ _, Aa • • \\ a \` iCE Corridor To/From \\ SR-241/SR-133 2016 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 22 92 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 Concept No: A-1 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate** Capital Cost* Support Cost (25%) RAW Cost Total Project Cost Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $1,488,000,000 $ 372, 000, 000 $ 860, 000, 000 $2,720,000,000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD * Capital costs include $160M for environmental mitigation excluding corresponding support cost, which is included in support cost estimate **Costs derived from Riverside County - Orange County MIS, January 2006 (2005 dollars) Concept Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a new 4-lane elevated expressway near or within the Santa Ana Canyon with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241 and 1-15. The facility may include managed lanes and potential reversible operations. Key Considerations Choice of alignment will be key to determining net capacity increase. Extensive right-of-way (RIW) will be required to implement the improvements if the alignment is not on the SR-91 corridor. If Project #3 or #10 is constructed and a 4-lane elevated facility is proposed within the median of SR-91 through Corona, then extensive managed lane closures would be required during construction (thus temporarily reducing SR-91 capacity during construction). An alternative could be studied for the median Corridor A viaduct along with reduced SR-91 geometric standards to minimize RAW impacts. Also, direct connectors (such as for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) 1 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) at 1-151SR-91) to/from the median could be precluded by Maglev columns located within the same median area. Ca!trans and Maglev highway RAW, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with a Maglev facility were pursued. Additional mitigation costs may be required for improvements to SR-241 and SR-133 as a result of additional Corridor traffic volumes. Corridor A as managed lanes, with potential extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15 (Project #3 and #10), may affect traffic distribution due to "parallel' tolled facilities_ Benefits The concept would provide significant congestion relief by allowing vehicles to bypass the at -grade freeway lanes and local arterial interchanges between SR-241 and 1-15. Connections are proposed directly between SR-91, SR-241, and 1-15. 0111U 2 VV6 LellICJ ---- - --- t EB LellICJ OF lu g-= iiii Abbreviations: WB = Westbound EB = Eastbound Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) Cross -Section Current Status This concept is identified in the Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as part of the Locally Preferred Strategy to improve mobility between Riverside County and Orange County. No project development work is planned at this time 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 23 93 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail Concept No: A-2 Anticipated Completion: 2035 Concept Cost Estimate* Total Capital Cost, Low $ 2,770,000,000 Total Capital Cost, High $ 3,200,000,000 Concept Schedule To be determined * Concept costs from American Magline Group (2012 dollars) Concept Description Proposals for a new super -speed train corridor from Anaheim to Ontario are included in this concept. This concept includes an alternative that would use SR-91 right-of-way, or would be aligned adjacent to SR-91 right-of-way, or could potentially be co -located with the Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) alignment. Another alignment opportunity is being investigated along SR-57. Key Considerations Alternative alignment impacts to SR-91 right-of-way envelope and/or Santa Ana River are undetermined. The choice of alignment will potentially impact MIS Corridor A (Concept #A-1). Right-of-way (R1W) will be required to implement the improvements. Potential considerations for co -locating the Magnetic Levitation (maglev) train adjacent to Corridor A (and also SR-91) include providing a two -column structure with a barrier between the trains and vehicles. Ca!trans and maglev highway RIW, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with a maglev facility were pursued. See the MIS Corridor A (Project #11) for additional considerations. Coordination with Metrolink improvements (Project #9) will be required. Benefits The concept would provide congestion relief by providing a direct high-speed/high-capacity connection with Ontario International Airport for Orange County air passengers and business next -day deliveries. Maglev will make the trip in just 14.5 minutes. Relieves congestion on SR-91 by providing additional capacity in the corridor. Current Status Preliminary design, engineering and Phases 1 and 2 of a Preliminary Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Statement (PEISIEIS) are completed. Congress has approved $45M in SAFETEA-LU for the environmental phase of the project. The Anaheim to Ontario segment is included in the "Constrained" Plan of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) passed in April 2012. Construction funding of up to $7 billion has been identified through a loan commitment from the China Export -Import Bank LEGEND Existing Highway High Speed Rail Representative Alignment I P CNN, L REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY c,ukrneHiA 91 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 94 24 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241ISR-133 to I-151Cajalco Road Concept No: A-3 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Concept Schedule Geotechnical Feasibility Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 7,675,000,000 $ 880,000,000 $ 300,000,000 $ 8,855,000,000 Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD * Costs derived from the Feasibility Evaluation Report (2009 dollars) LEGEND Existing Highway ICE (Corridor B) Representative Alignment NOTE: REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY Concept Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a highway and rail facility through the Cleveland National Forest with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241/SR-133 and I-15/Cajalco Road. The facility would essentially be a continuation of SR-133 on the west end of the corridor, to 1-15 on the east end. Key Considerations The tunnel concept is technically feasible based on the geotechnical investigation completed in December 2009. The initial project phase would be the construction of one 2-lane highway tunnel and one rail tunnel. The second project phase would include construction of a second 2-lane highway tunnel. Additional technical studies and geotechnical borings would be needed to refine the tunnel alignments and grades. Costs associated with the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) tunnels are based on the Feasibility Evaluation Report completed in December 2009. A financial analysis will be needed for the construction, operations and toll requirements of the ICE tunnels. Benefits The concept would provide significant congestion relief by providing an alternative route between Orange and Riverside counties and would allow vehicles to bypass SR-91 between SR-241 and 1-15. The concept would not disrupt SR-91 traffic during construction and would allow for additional route selection for incident management, emergency evacuation, and for continuity of the highway network by linking SR-133 to 1-15. Current Status On August 27, 2010 the Riverside Orange Corridor Authority Board took action to defer additional study of the ICE concept until such time as financial considerations improve and/or technological advancements warrant reexamination. Review of the concept shall be done annually through the SR-91 Implementation Plan update to determine if any of the major assumptions with regard to financial considerations, private sector interest, or technological advancements have changed to make the tunnel financially viable. (See "ICE status summary" for further discussion). 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 25 95 WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Connector Improvements Concept No: A-4 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost, Low $ 75,000,000 Total Project Cost, High $ 150,000,000 Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction TBD TBD TBD TBD TB D Note: Project costs derived from the SR-91 PSR/PDS between SR-57 and SR-55 (2014 Dollars), and excludes support and RIW costs. PLACENTA NGE Xort ■ns of t s map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps an YOR BA LI NDA VILLA PAP l? ANA HEN SR-55JSR-91 Interchange Improvements Concept Description The project consists of operational improvements by modifying the connector to SB SR-55 from WB SR-91. The improvements would extend to Lakeview Avenue to the east and would include a new connector from WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 as a right-hand exit. Key Considerations Right-of-way impacts, detailed SR-55JSR-91 interchange improvements, and downstream impacts to SR-55 require further evaluation in a subsequent phase of project development. Conceptual design of SR-55JSR-91 would be coordinated with completed improvements at SR-91 and Tustin Avenue (Project #B-5), and with the SR-91 Environmental Study Improvements from SR-57 to SR-55 (Project #5). The study for Project #5 is currently being conducted which includes the SR-55JSR-91 interchange area, however, that project's objective is to primarily improve operations of the SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-57. Operational enhancements between SR-55 and Lakeview Avenue by Project #5 may provide some benefit for SR-55JSR-91 by addressing WB SR-91 weaving issues. Benefits Interchange improvements are anticipated to provide congestion relief for SR-91 traffic and potentially improve the connection from WB SR-91 to SB SR-55. Current Status SR-55fSR-91 project information was derived from the Final Alternatives Evaluation and Refinement Report, December 2005, by the Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS). Focused SR-911SR-55 conceptual engineering needs to be scheduled. However, initial conceptual engineering was also studied as part of the SR-91 Feasibility Study Between State Route 57 and State Route 55 Interchange Areas in June 2009. ~\ h N, CHINO HILLS ilit �y 1 ' eproduced with permission. CORONA NORCi , c,orneH,A 91 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 96 26 EB SR-9.1 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 Concept No: A-5 Anticipated Completion: TBD Concept Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost (25%) RAW Cost Total Project Cost Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental $ 25,000,000 $ 6,250,000 $0 $ 31,250,00 TBD TBD TBD Design TBD Construction TBD This project currently does not have an identified funding source(s) for any of the project development phases; however, District 12 has indicated this is one of its top priority projects. LEGEND i Existing Highway r.� interchange/Ramp Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Project #3 Improvements Weir Canyon Rd Off Concept Description The location of the proposed EB SR-91 fifth general purpose (GP) lane addition (The Segment) is on EB SR-91 from Weir Canyon Road to the NB SR-241 Connector. The Segment consists of 4 (four) GP lanes and 2 (two) managed lanes (91 Express Lanes). Upstream (westerly) from The Segment the EB SR-91 has 5 GP lanes and the 5th lane drops to the SB SR-241 Connector as some traffic volume exits to the SB SR-241. Downstream from The Segment the EB SR-91 gains the 5th lane back as the NB SR-241 Connector merges with SR-91 in a dedicated lane addition. This 5th lane continues beyond the Riverside County line providing enhanced mobility. Key Considerations This segment with 4 GP lanes might be creating a traffic choke point due to the decrease of capacity, potentially contributing to significant traffic delays passing through this segment along with other traffic issues such as queue jumping, weaving, merging and operational speed differential. However, additional traffic from NB SR-241 to EB SR-91 and Gypsum Canyon Rd on -ramp suggest balancing the number of lanes should be carefully examined. As such, additional capacity will enhance EB freeway operations along this Segment. Benefits 1. Extends the existing 5th EB GP lane easterly and ties it to the existing 5th lane downstream. This could provide capacity enhancement and may result in removing an existing choke point. Significant delay savings is anticipated. 2. Potentially eliminate queue jumping in this area from EB SR-91 as well as Weir Canyon Rd. 3. Potentially reduce speed differential between through lanes, thus creating a more balanced flow. 4. Potentially provide lane balance at high traffic demand area. On Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off n Off On Off Lanes shown are for the SR-241A91 Express Lanes Connector (Project #3) On Current Status Additional traffic analysis and study is required to confirm the benefits to EB SR-91 by the proposed improvements. This location was identified by Caltrans as a high congestion location in the County. The concept is intended to improve the choke point that exists due to the presence of a 4 lane segment between 5 lane freeway segments. This project currently does not have an identified funding source for any of the project development phases; however, this concept is a District 12 top priority project. 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 27 97 SECTION4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS The following exhibits represent completed projects from previous Plans since 2006, and are intended to be used as a reference to illustrate the progress made since the inception of the Plan. Note: some projects listed in the Plan as completed (see Section 1, Project Accomplishments) are not included herein since there was no exhibit created or necessary for use with prior Plans (such as for restriping projects, various safety enhancements, minor operational improvements, etc.). Appendix Project No. Project Improvements Constructed B-1 Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement March 2009 B-2 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure June 2009 B-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 September 2010 B-4 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction December 2012 B-5 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue April 2016 B-6 Metrolink Service Improvements June 2016 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 28 98 Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement Appendix Project No: B-1 Actual Completion: March 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost RIW Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 21,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $301,000 $ 24,301,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed Project Schedule Ca!trans Equivalents: Preliminary Engineering = PID Environmental = PA/ED Design = PS&E Abbreviations: CD = Collector Distributor Lane FTR = Future HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle SHLD = Shoulder 77' 138' Project Description Improvements primarily consist of replacing the existing Green River Road overcrossing with a new six -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate future widening of SR-91. The interior spans will accommodate up to eight mainline lanes in each direction including two HOV lanes. The exterior spans can accommodate two lanes, either for auxiliary lanes or collector distributor roads. Entrance and exit ramps will be realigned and widened to accommodate the new bridge, yet the interchange will retain its current configuration. New signals will be installed at the ramp intersections. Ramp and bridge improvements will be constructed within existing right of way. Key Considerations Design interface is required with the Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71, SR-711SR-91 Interchange Improvements, SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project, and SR-2411SR-91 HOV/HOT Connector. Benefits The project will improve the level of service at ramp and local street intersections at the interchange. Improvements will reduce ramp queues that extend into the freeway's general purpose lanes, thus contributing to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The project began construction in March 2007 and was completed in March 2009. 13 B' 79' New Bridge I I T ' 1441 •I me i rtn ° ntt j I rra rm i rm i I ; f i + I v+ i I I'ne i n i xw E i i rnt rm i e� l i rrt' I T i rrR i 1e�oi cul d �q mtdLTAi elWE'LAMguwe:Wei ,wsiwte.m4I� ewnwe +-0.! vasiva1iunnL"Weiwslew��.awu mi eoitr.d W' 1r i tr :1e' I T; 1r l 1r S 1r i 1r i 1r lZ i 1r jri tt i 121 1rl 111r E 12' 1T+} 1r tr l tr l7•; tr i try 17i 'R'` 1ri 1I 4 t2'� to•J r E WB ° EB GREEN RIVER BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION NOTE: All dimensions are approximate 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 29 99 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure Appendix Project No: B-2 Actual Completion: June 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 20,000,000 Support Cost $ 5,000,000 RIW Cost $0 Total Project Cost $ 25,004,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed in PLACENTIA ns of t s map co YORBA LINDA ANAHEIM VILLA PARK ynghted by Thomas Bros Mapis an Project Description The project provides a six level parking structure with 1,065 parking stalls. The construction is within the existing North Main Street Metrolink station property in Corona. Key Considerations Proposed improvements were constructed within existing right of way. Currently there are 700 users of the facility, 200 more that were previously able to accomodate. Additionally RCTC has opened up the lot to park and ride carpools and vanpools and has issued over 120 permits for carpoolers to use the expanded station. This shows an added benefit of supporting carpooling as well as transit to offset congestion on SR-91. Benefits Demand for parking currently exceeds the capacity at the North Main Street Corona station. New parking capacity Will allow Metrolink ridership to increase thereby diverting vehicle trips from SR-91. Current Status Construction was initiated in January 2008 and was completed in June 2009. The project was funded with Federal Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. N. CHINO HILLS i Metrolink Parking Structure s produced with permission. NORCO 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 30 100 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 Appendix Project No: B-3 Actual Completion: September 2010 Project Cost Estimate Capital Cost Support Cost RIW Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 41,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 51,200,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed LEGEND - Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp - County Line - HOV or HOT Lane - Existing Lane Project Improvement Lane - Existing Interchange DnG m Canyon Rd Dn Dff r— � 1 Project Description The project will provide an additional eastbound (EB) lane from the SR-911SR-241 interchange to the SR-71ISR-91 interchange and will widen all EB lanes and shoulders to standard widths. Key Considerations Coordination with the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (Project #3 and #11) will be required. Staged construction would be required for all ramp reconstruction and freeway widening. Freeway operations would most likely be affected by this project, however, freeway lane closures are not anticipated. An EB concrete shoulder will be constructed with a 12 foot width to provide for future widening as contemplated by Project #3 and #11. Benefits The lane addition would help to alleviate the weaving condition between SR-241 and SR-71, as well as remove vehicles from the SR-91 mainline that would be exiting at Green River Road and SR-71. Current Status Funding is from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) with $71.44M approved, and the balance of project costs are from other sources. Construction began in late 2009 and was completed in September 2010. Coal Canyon WLC County Line Green River Rd On Off On Off 1 ab• i Off On Off - - -- -- - - i (�------- On Off --I On Off On 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 31 101 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction Appendix Project No: B-4 Actual Completion: January 2013 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost R!W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 65,005,000 $ 19,639,000 $ 573,000 $ 85,217,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed LEGEND - Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp - Existing Interchange HOV or HOT Lane -7 Existing Lane Project Improvement Lane Auxiliary Lane Off I - f L- On Off Lakeview Av On Off On On Off Project Description This project proposes capacity and operational improvements by adding one general purpose (GP) lane on eastbound (EB) SR-91 from the SR-551 SR-91 connector to east of the Weir Canyon Road interchange and on westbound (WB) SR-91 from just east of Weir Canyon Road interchange to the Imperial Highway (SR-90) interchange. Additionally, this project would facilitate truck traffic approaching the truck scales in both directions. Key Considerations Caltrans is not considering relocation of the truck scales at this time. Benefits Alleviates congestion on WB SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop at the truck scales and providing a continuous GP lane to SR-90. Alleviates congestion an EB SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop for northbound (NB) SR-55 at SR-91 by providing an auxiliary lane to Lakeview Avenue, and at SR-90 by providing a continuous GP lane through Weir Canyon Construction was completed in January 2013. The project received $22M of Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) funding and $74M of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Augmentation funds. Gypsum Truck Scales Weir Canyon Rd / Off On Off On Off Canyon Rd vIK On Off - - - _ ___ _ _L _L On Off On Off On On Dff�i Off NOTE: FAIRMONT BLVD IS CONTINGENT UPON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 32 102 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue Appendix Project No: B-5 Actual Completion: April 2016 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost RIW Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 22,218,000 $ 16,382,000 $ 4,682,000 $ 43,282,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed l LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp County Line © HOV Lane Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane 1 Off Project Description The project will add a westbound (WB) auxiliary lane on SR-91 beginning at the northbound (NB) SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector through the Tustin Avenue interchange. This project includes approximately 1.1 lane miles. Key Considerations Build Alternative 3 was selected from the Project Study Report (PSR), On Westbound (WB) SR-91 Auxiliary Zane from the Northbound {NB} SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange, and requires additional right-of-way. City of Anaheim utilities are within close proximity of the proposed widening section. Widening of the Santa Ana River bridge is required. Coordination with the City of Anaheim occurred for widening of Tustin Avenue and the WB SR-91 Off -Ramp that was completed in early 2011. Benefits The project would reduce or eliminate operational problems and deficiencies on this section of WB SR-91 including weaving and merging maneuvers. This project would also address choke -point conditions, which are caused primarily by extensive weaving between the NB SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector and the WB SR-91 off -ramp to Tustin Avenue. Current Status Preliminary engineering was completed and approved by Caltrans. The environmental phase was completed in November 2010, and design was completed in mid-2013. Construction was initiated in February 2014. The project received $14M from the Proposition 1B State -Local Partnership Program (SLPP), $14M from Measure M, with the balance from Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. Contract acceptance and open to traffic in May 2016. Tustin Au WB 5R-91 Tustin Av Off On Off Lakeview Av Off On 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 33 103 Metrolink Service Improvements Appendix Project No: B-6 Actual Completion: 2016 Project Cost Estimate* IEOC Service Cost Perris Valley Line Cost Total Metrolink Costs Project Schedule Complete 2016 $ 1,160,000 $ 248,000,000 $ 249,160,000 Costs from OCTA and RCTC (in 2015 dollars) Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) are coordinating on the implementation of additional commuter rail service on the Inland Empire — Orange County (IEOC) Line, which operates between Oceanside and San Bernardino. The ongoing success of the IEOC Line service and significant freeway construction on parallel corridors would bolster potential growth on Metrolink. Currently, there are sixteen (16) daily trains that run on the IEOC Line and nine (9) trains running on the 91 Line for a total of 25 daily trains. There will be an additional two IEOC roundtrips by late 2015. The long-term service improvements will include 24 IEOC trains by 2030. Construction began in October 2013 and was opened to riders in early in early 2016 on the $248,300,000 Perris Valley Line (PVL), which will expand Metrolink commuter rail service on the 91 Line (Riverside to Los Angeles, via Fullerton). The new service will extend 24 miles from downtown Riverside to south Perris and will add four new stations along the route. The PVL is expected to open to riders by December 2015. The project is located within the right of way of the existing San Jacinto Branch Line through Riverside, Moreno Valley and Perris. The PVL is the first extension of Metrolink service since the Antelope Valley Line was built in 1994. The initial schedule (December 2015) has nine trains through to Los Angeles and 12 between Perris and Riverside. Key Considerations The long-term plan (by 2030) adds more service by constructing additional stations. The City of Anaheim is also proposing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second track and platform to be implemented as part of the long-term plan. The City of Placentia is currently in the environmental phase for a new Metrolink commuter rail passenger station and parking lot to be constructed as part of the long-term plan. Benefits Enables development of expanded Metrolink service and improves efficiency, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status Two additional IEOC Line roundtrips were added in late 2015 and nine trains from the expanded PVL were added early 2016. TON PLACENTIA 4trTrains Los Angeles via Fullerton DAILY TRAINS Existing: 25 2016: 27 YORBA LINDA -(rains to Central l I .... South Orange County ANAHEIM DAILY TRAINS Existing: 16 2016: 18 Bernardino CHINO HILLS NORCO CORONA , 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 34 104 SECTION 5: REFERENCES The following documents and resources were used in the development of the 2016 Plan. Data was provided by OCTA, RCTC, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), other agencies and online resources. Riverside Transit Agency, Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, January 22, 2015 PSR-PDS on Route 91 Between SR-57 and SR-55, October 2014 PS&E for "Westbound State Route 91 Auxiliary Lane from the NB SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange", 2014 PS&E for Initial SR-91 CIP Project, 2014 California Transportation Commission, Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), Amended December 2012 M2020 Plan (Measure M), September 2012 PSR-PDS for SR-241/SR-91 Connector, January 2012 Project Report and Environmental Document (EIR/EIS) for SR-91 CIP from SR-241 to Pierce Street Project, October 2012 PS&E "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2011 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report, August 2010 Project Study Report/Project Report "Right of Way Relinquishment on Westbound State Route 91 Between Weir Canyon Road and Coal Canyon", May 2010 SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study, December 2009 SR-91 Feasibility Study from SR-57 to SR-55, December 2009 Feasibility Evaluation Report for Irvine -Corona Expressway Tunnels, December 2009 Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71, May 2009 PSR "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2009 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study, March 2009 PSR/PR "On Gypsum Canyon Road Between the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Westbound Off -Ramp (PM 16.4) and the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Eastbound Direct On -Ramp (PM 16.4)", June 2008 PSR "On Route 91 from Green River Road to Serfas Club Drive in the City of Corona in Riverside County", December 2006 Orange County Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, November 2006 Riverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) — Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report, January 2006 California — Nevada Interstate Maglev Project Report, Anaheim -Ontario Segment; California -Nevada Super Speed Train Commission, American Magline Group, August 2003 Route Concept Reports for SR-91, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 Various Preliminary Drawings and Cross Sections, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan 35 105 AGENDA ITEM 8E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 16-31-102-00 with County of Riverside to Fund a Project Study Report Equivalent Document for the Ethanac Road/State Route 74/Nichols Road Corridor WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 16-31-102-00 with the county of Riverside (County) for $2 million of 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridors program funds for the preparation of a project study report equivalent (PSRE) document for the Ethanac Road/State Route 74/Nichols Road corridor, for which the County will serve as lead agency; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Approve an increase of $1 million in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budgeted expenditures for preliminary engineering. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its November 2014 meeting, the Commission approved $2 million of 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridors Program funds in response to a joint request from the County and cities of Lake Elsinore, Menifee, and Perris (Cities) for funding of an east -west corridor along SR-74/Ethanac Road to serve as a direct route between Antelope Road in Romoland and SR-74 in Meadowbrook, and the establishment of a new connection from SR-74 to Interstate 15 via Nichols Road. The purpose of the study is to eliminate circuitous detours thereby providing an efficient east -west route. The PSRE is estimated to cost $3 million; the County and the Cities have committed a total of $1 million in addition to the Commission's $2 million. The corridor to be studied would include a two-mile missing link, bridge crossing, grade separation, and approximately 1.5 miles of new road. The PSRE will need to be a comprehensive corridor study that evaluates multimodal options including transit and active Agenda Item 8E 106 transportation concepts, as these mobility options are essential components of a comprehensive system. The County is ready to proceed with this effort, and staff recommends the execution of a funding agreement in the amount of $2 million and authorization for the Executive Director to execute the agreement, pursuant to legal counsel review. The reimbursements to the County for the study are not included in the FY 2016/17 budget; therefore, a budget adjustment in the amount of $1 million is needed in FY 2016/17 with the remaining $1 million to be expended in the subsequent year. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No N/A Year: FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 Amount: $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridors Program funds Budget Adjustment: Yes N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 615133 81101 00000 0000 261 73 81101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \Pbu.dj Date: 06/13/2016 Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement No. 16-31-102-00 Agenda Item 8E 107 Agreement No. 16-31-102-00 AGREEMENT FOR THE FUNDING OF MEASURE A WESTERN COUNTY NEW CORRIDORS IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE RIVERSIDECOUNTY 1. Parties and Date. 1.1 This Agreement is executed and entered into this day of , 2016, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("RCTC") and the County of Riverside ("County"). RCTC and County are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "Parties". 2. Recitals. 2.1 RCTC is a county transportation commission created and existing pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Sections 130053 and 130053.5. 2.2 On November 5, 2002 the voters of Riverside County approved Measure A authorizing the collection of a one-half percent (1/2%) retail transactions and use tax to fund transportation programs and improvements within the County of Riverside, and adopting the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Plan (the "Plan"). 2.3 Measure A allocates $370 million in matching funding for four new transportation corridors in Western Riverside County ("New Corridors") identified as necessary through the Community Environmental Transportation Approval Process (CETAP). The Measure A funds are to be made available to leverage local, state and federal funding for environmental clearance, right of way, and construction of the New Corridors. 2.4 Pursuant to Public Utility Code Sections 240000 et seq., RCTC is authorized to allocate the proceeds of the Measure A tax in furtherance of the Plan. 2.5 RCTC intends, by this Agreement, to distribute Measure A Western County New Corridors funds ("New Corridors Funds"), subject to the conditions provided herein, and to participate with the County, as the lead agency, and the cities of Lake Elsinore, Menifee, and Perris in the joint development of the study of the Ethanac Road/State Route 74 (SR-74)/Nichols Road Corridor Project (Project), as defined herein. 2.6 The Project is a proposed east -west corridor to eliminate circuitous detours thereby providing an efficient east -west route between Interstate 215 (I-215) and I-15. The Project would include a two-mile missing link, bridge crossing, grade separation, and approximately 1.5 miles of 17336.00001\29018368.1 1 108 new road. The Project is a comprehensive corridor study that evaluates multimodal options including transit and active transportation concepts. The outcome of the Project may result in designating the Ethanac Road/SR-74/Nichols Road Corridor as one of the primary east -west new transportation corridors between I-215 and I-15 identified in Measure A and the CETAP eligible for funding. 3. Terms. 3.1 Description of Work. This Agreement is intended to distribute New Corridors Funds to the County for the project study report equivalent document for the Ethanac Road/State Route 74/Nichols Road Corridor, an east -west corridor along SR-74/Ethanac Road to serve as a direct route between Antelope Road in Romoland and SR-74 in Meadowbrook and the establishment of a new connection from SR-74 to Interstate 15 via Nichols Road, ("the Work"). The Work, including a timetable and a detailed scope of work, is more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and, pursuant to Section 3.15 below, is subject to modification as requested by the County and approved by RCTC. The Work shall be consistent with PA&ED — Project Approvals & Environmental Document. The Project is more fully described in Exhibit `B" attached hereto. It is understood and agreed that the County shall expend New Corridors Funds only as set forth in this Agreement and only for the Work. To this end, any use of funds provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of RCTC. 3.2 RCTC Funding Amount. RCTC hereby agrees to distribute to the County, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, a sum not to exceed Two Million ($2,000,000), to be used exclusively for reimbursing the County for eligible Work expenses as described herein ("Funding Amount"). The County acknowledges and agrees that the Funding Amount may be less than the actual cost of the Work, and that RCTC shall not contribute New Corridors Funds in excess of the maximum authorized in this section. 3.2.1 Eligible Work Costs. The total Work costs ("Total Work Cost") may include the following items, provided that such items are included in the scope of work attached as Exhibit "A": (1) County and/or consultant costs associated with direct Work coordination and support; (2) funds expended in preparation of preliminary engineering studies; (3) funds expended for preparation of environmental review documentation for the Work. 3.2.2 Ineligible Work Costs. The Total Work Cost shall not include the following items which shall be borne solely by the County without reimbursement: (1) County administrative costs; (2) County costs attributed to the preparation of invoices, billings and payments; (3) any County fees attributed to the processing of the Work; and (4) expenses for items of work not included within the scope of work in Exhibit "A". 3.2.3 Increases in Work Funding. The Funding Amount may, in RCTC's sole discretion, be augmented with additional New Corridors Funds. Any such increase in the Funding Amount must be approved in writing by RCTC's Executive Director. No such increased funding shall be expended to pay for any Work already completed. For purposes of this Agreement, the 17336.00001\29018368.1 2 109 Work or any portion thereof shall be deemed complete upon its acceptance by RCTC's Executive Director. 3.2.4 Cost Savings. In the event that bids for the Work are lower than anticipated, or there are cost savings for any other reason, the Funding Amount shall be reduced as follows: cost savings shall be applied proportionately to each funding source listed in Exhibit "A" for the Work. The County shall inform RCTC of any cost savings and the Parties shall amend this Agreement to reflect the revised Funding Amount. RCTC's Executive Director and the Assistant Director of Transportation or his or her designee shall be authorized to execute any such amendment. 3.3 County's Funding Obligation to Complete the Work. In the event that the New Corridors Funds allocated to the Work represent less than the total cost of the Work, the County shall provide such additional funds as may be required to complete the Work as described in Exhibit "A". 3.3.1 County's Obligation to Repay New Corridors Funds to RCTC. In the event that: (i) the County, for any reason, determines not to proceed with or complete the Work; or (ii) the Work is not timely completed, subject to any extension of time granted by RCTC pursuant to Section 3.15; the County agrees that any New Corridors Funds that were distributed to the County for the Work shall be repaid in full to RCTC. The Parties shall enter into good faith negotiations to establish a reasonable repayment schedule and repayment mechanism which may include, but is not limited to, withholding of Measure A Local Streets and Roads revenues. The County acknowledges and agrees that RCTC shall have the right to withhold any Measure A Local Streets and Roads revenues due the County, in an amount not to exceed the total of the funds distributed to the County, and/or initiate legal action to compel repayment, if the County fails to repay RCTC within a reasonable time period not to exceed 180 days from receipt of written notification from RCTC that repayment is required. 3.3.2 County's Local Match Contribution. The County shall provide at least One Million dollars ($1,000,000) of funding toward the Work, as shown in Exhibit "A" and as called out in the County's Request submitted to RCTC on September 30, 2014. 3.4 Work Responsibilities of the County. The County shall be responsible for the following aspects of the Work, in compliance with state and federal law provided that such items are included in the Project scope of work attached as Exhibit "A": (i) all aspects of bidding, awarding, and administration of the consultant for the Work; (ii) all consultant administration of the Work activities undertaken, taking into consideration available funding, including New Corridors Funds. 3.5 Term/Notice of Completion. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first herein above written until: (i) the date RCTC formally accepts the Work as complete, pursuant to Section 3.2.3; (ii) termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 3.9; or (iii) the County has fully satisfied its obligations under this Agreement. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect following the termination of this Agreement. 3.6 Representatives of the Parties. RCTC's Executive Director, or his or her designee, shall serve as RCTC's representative and shall have the authority to act on behalf of RCTC for all purposes under this Agreement. The County hereby designates its Assistant Director of Transportation or his or her designee, as the County's representative to RCTC. The County's 17336.00001\29018368.1 3 110 representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of the County for all purposes under this Agreement and shall coordinate all activities of the Work under the County's responsibility. The County shall work closely and cooperate fully with RCTC's representative and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction over or an interest in the Work. 3.7 Expenditure of Funds by County Prior to Execution of Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent or preclude the County from expending funds on the Work prior to the execution of the Agreement, or from being reimbursed by RCTC for such expenditures. However, the County understands and acknowledges that any expenditure of funds on the Work prior to the execution of the Agreement is made at the County's sole risk, and that some expenditures by the County may not be eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. 3.8 Review of Services. The County shall allow RCTC's Representative to inspect or review the progress of the Work at any reasonable time in order to determine whether the terms of this Agreement are being met. 3.9 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated for cause or convenience as further specified below. 3.9.1 Termination for Convenience. 3.9.1.1 Notice. Either RCTC or the County may, by written notice to the other party, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, for convenience by giving thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. 3.9.1.2 Effect of Termination for Convenience. In the event that the County terminates this Agreement for convenience, the County shall, within 180 days, repay to RCTC in full all New Corridors Funds provided to the County under this Agreement. In the event that RCTC terminates this Agreement for convenience, RCTC shall, within 90 days, distribute to the County New Corridors Funds in an amount equal to the aggregate total of all unpaid invoices which have been received from the County regarding the Work at the time of the notice of termination; provided, however, that RCTC shall be entitled to exercise its rights under Section 3.14.2, including but not limited to conducting a review of the invoices and requesting additional information. This Agreement shall terminate upon receipt by the non -terminating party of the amounts due it under this Section 3.9.1.2. 3.9.2 Termination for Cause. 3.9.2.1 Notice. Either RCTC or the County may, by written notice to the other party, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, in response to a material breach hereof by the other party, by giving written notice to the other party of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. The written notice shall provide a 30 day period to cure any alleged breach. During the 30 day cure period, the Parties shall discuss, in good faith, the manner in which the breach can be cured. 3.9.2.2 Effect of Termination for Cause. In the event that the County terminates this Agreement in response to RCTC's uncured material breach hereof, RCTC shall, 17336.00001\29018368.1 4 111 within 90 days, distribute to the County New Corridor Funds in an amount equal to the aggregate total of all unpaid invoices which have been received from the County regarding the Work at the time of the notice of termination. In the event that RCTC terminates this Agreement in response to the County's uncured material breach hereof, the County shall, within 180 days, repay to RCTC in full all New Corridors Funds provided to the County under this Agreement. Notwithstanding termination of this Agreement by RCTC pursuant to this Section 3.9.2.2, RCTC shall be entitled to exercise its rights under Section 3.14.2, including but not limited to conducting a review of the invoices and requesting additional information. This Agreement shall terminate upon receipt by the terminating party of the amounts due it under this Section 3.9.2.2. 3.9.3 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement. 3.10 Prevailing Wages. The County and any other person or entity hired to perform services on the Work are alerted to the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq., which would require the payment of prevailing wages were the services or any portion thereof determined to be a public work, as defined therein. The County shall ensure compliance with these prevailing wage requirements by any person or entity hired to perform the Work. The County shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless RCTC, its officers, employees, consultants, and agents from any claim or liability, including without limitation attorneys, fees, arising from its failure or alleged failure to comply with California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. 3.11 Progress Reports. RCTC may request the County to provide RCTC with progress reports concerning the status of the Work. 3.12 Indemnification. 3.12.1 County Responsibilities. In addition to the indemnification required under Section 3.10, the County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless RCTC, its officers, agents, consultants, and employees from any and all claims, demands, costs or liability arising from or connected with all activities governed by this Agreement including all design and construction activities, due to any act of the County or its subcontractors whatsoever, regardless of fault, including negligent acts, errors or omissions or willful misconduct, except that caused by the sole negligence of RCTC. The County will reimburse RCTC for any expenditures, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by RCTC, in defending against claims ultimately determined to be due to any act of the County or its subcontractors whatsoever, regardless of fault, including negligent acts, errors or omissions or willful misconduct, except that caused by the sole negligence of RCTC. 3.12.2 Effect of Acceptance. The County shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and the coordination of any services provided to complete the Work. RCTC's review, acceptance or funding of any services performed by the County or any other person or entity under this agreement shall not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights RCTC may hold under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising out of this Agreement. Further, the County shall be and remain liable to RCTC, in accordance with applicable law, for all damages to RCTC caused by the County's performance of this Agreement or supervision of any services provided to complete the Work. 17336.00001\29018368.1 5 112 3.13 Insurance. The County shall require, at a minimum, all persons or entities hired to perform the Work to obtain, and require their subcontractors to obtain, insurance of the types and in the amounts described below and satisfactory to the County and RCTC. Such insurance shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement, or until completion of the Work, whichever occurs last. 3.13.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance. Occurrence version commercial general liability insurance or equivalent form with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to the Work or be no less than two times the occurrence limit. Such insurance shall: 3.13.1.1 Name RCTC and County, and their respective officials, officers, employees, agents, and consultants as insured with respect to performance of the services on the Work and shall contain no special limitations on the scope of coverage or the protection afforded to these insured; 3.13.1.2 Be primary with respect to any insurance or self insurance programs covering RCTC and County, and/or their respective officials, officers, employees, agents, and consultants; and 3.13.1.3 Contain standard separation of insured provisions. 3.13.2 Business Automobile Liability Insurance. Business automobile liability insurance or equivalent form with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. 3.13.3 Professional Liability Insurance. Errors and omissions liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 Professional liability insurance shall only be required of design or engineering professionals. 3.13.4 Workers' Compensation Insurance. Workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and employers' liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000.00 each accident. 3.14 Procedures for Distribution of New Corridors Funds to County. 3.14.1 Initial Payment by the County. The County shall be responsible for initial payment of all the Work costs as they are incurred. Following payment of such Work costs, the County shall submit invoices to RCTC requesting reimbursement of eligible Work costs. Each invoice shall be accompanied by detailed contractor invoices, or other demands for payment addressed to the County, and documents evidencing the County's payment of the invoices or demands for payment. The County shall submit invoices not more often than monthly and not less often than quarterly. 3.14.2 Review and Reimbursement by RCTC. Upon receipt of an invoice from the County, RCTC may request additional documentation or explanation of the Work costs for which reimbursement is sought. Undisputed amounts shall be paid by RCTC to the County within thirty 17336.00001\29018368.1 6 113 (30) days. In the event that RCTC disputes the eligibility of the County for reimbursement of all or a portion of an invoiced amount, the Parties shall meet and confer in an attempt to resolve the dispute. If the meet and confer process is unsuccessful in resolving the dispute, the County may appeal RCTC's decision as to the eligibility of one or more invoices to RCTC's Executive Director. The County may appeal the decision of the Executive Director to the full RCTC Board, the decision of which shall be final. Additional details concerning the procedure for the County's submittal of invoices to RCTC and RCTC's consideration and payment of submitted invoices are set forth in Exhibit "C", attached hereto. 3.14.3 Funding Amount/Adjustment. If a post Work audit or review indicates that RCTC has provided reimbursement to the County in an amount in excess of the maximum New Corridors Funds provided for in section 3.2 of this Agreement, or has provided reimbursement of ineligible Work costs, the County shall reimburse RCTC for the excess or ineligible payments within 30 days of notification by RCTC. 3.15 Work Amendments. Changes to the characteristics of the Work, including the deadline for Work completion, and any responsibilities of the County or RCTC may be requested in writing by the County and are subject to the approval of RCTC's Representative, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, provided that extensions of time for completion of the Work shall be approved in the sole discretion of RCTC's Representative. 3.16 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of the County or RCTC, during the term of his or her service with the County or RCTC, as the case may be, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.17 Limited Scope of Duties. RCTC's and the County's duties and obligations under this Agreement are limited to those described herein. RCTC has no obligation with respect to the safety of any Work performed at a job site. In addition, RCTC shall not be liable for any action of County or its contractors relating to the condemnation of property undertaken by County or construction related to the Work. 3.18 Books and Records. Each party shall maintain complete, accurate, and clearly identifiable records with respect to costs incurred for the Work under this Agreement. They shall make available for examination by the other party, its authorized agents, officers or employees any and all ledgers and books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or related to the expenditures and disbursements charged to the other party pursuant to this Agreement. Further, each party shall furnish to the other party, its agents or employees such other evidence or information as they may require with respect to any such expense or disbursement charged by them. All such information shall be retained by the Parties for at least three (3) years following termination of this Agreement, and they shall have access to such information during the three-year period for the purposes of examination or audit. 3.19 Equal Opportunity Employment. The Parties represent that they are equal opportunity employers and they shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant of reemployment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall 17336.00001\29018368.1 7 114 include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 3.20 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.21 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit. 3.22 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.23 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.24 Notification. All notices hereunder and communications regarding interpretation of the terms of the Agreement or changes thereto shall be provided by the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: County of Riverside RCTC Transportation Department Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon St., 8th Floor 4080 Lemon, 3rd Floor Riverside, Ca 92501 Mailing address: P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92501 ATTN: Patricia Romo ATTN: Executive Director Any notice so given shall be considered served on the other party three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred regardless of the method of service. 3.25 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached appendices or exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.26 Contract Amendment. In the event that the Parties determine that the provisions of this Agreement should be altered, the Parties may execute a contract amendment to add any provision to this Agreement, or delete or amend any provision of this Agreement. All such contract amendments must be in the form of a written instrument signed by the original signatories to this Agreement, or their successors or designees. 17336.00001\29018368.1 8 115 3.27 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any previous agreements or understandings. 3.28 No Waiver. Failure of RCTC to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.29 Validity of Agreement. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement. 3.30 Independent Contractors. Any person or entities retained by the County or any contractor shall be retained on an independent contractor basis and shall not be employees of RCTC. Any personnel performing services on the Work shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the County or contractor, whichever is applicable. The County or contractor shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of services on the Work and as required by law. The County or consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance and workers' compensation insurance. 3.31 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to be performed after any expiration or termination of this Agreement shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.32 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.33 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [Signatures on following page] 17336.00001\29018368.1 9 116 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT FOR THE FUNDING OF MEASURE A WESTERN COUNTY NEW CORRIDORS IMPROVEMENTS RIVERSIDE COUNTY COUNTY OR FIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Recommended for Approval: By: By: Dated: Dated: Anne Mayer Patricia Romo Executive Director Assistant Director of Transportation APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Best, Best & Krieger Dated: Counsel to the Riverside County County Counsel, Riverside County Transportation Commission APPROVAL BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Dated: Printed Name Chairman Riverside County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Dated: 17336.00001\29018368.1 10 117 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK, FUNDING AND TIMETABLE SCOPE OF WORK: Detail the Phase(s) of Work to be performed under this Agreement. (Note: Detail the full Project description on Exhibit B.) Provide specific information regarding the Work to be performed, identify the reaches of the work and include a general location map and site map, if applicable. For guidance in developing this Exhibit, please refer to Exhibit A 1. The Project is to prepare a Project Study Report Equivalent (PSRE) document for a proposed east - west corridor to eliminate circuitous detours thereby providing an efficient east -west route between Interstate 215 (I-215) and I-15. The Project would include a two-mile missing link, bridge crossing, grade separation, and approximately 1.5 miles of new road. The Project is a comprehensive corridor study that evaluates multimodal options including transit and active transportation concepts. The outcome of the Project may result in designating the Ethanac Road/SR-74/Nichols Road Corridor as one of the primary east -west new transportation corridors between I-215 and I-15 identified in Measure A and the CETAP eligible for funding. FUNDING: Identify New Corridors, local, state and/or federal funding for each Phase of Work. Delete those Phase which are not part of this Agreement. PHASE New Corridors Fund LOCAL STATE/FEDERAL TOTAL PSRE $=2,000,000 $=1,000,000 $=0 $3,000,000 TIMETABLE: Provide at a minimum the beginning and ending dates for each phase of work including major milestones within a phase. 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit A 118 EXHIBIT "B" PROJECT"DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, FUNDING AND MILESTONES PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The County of Riverside (COUNTY) identified a need to study the Ethanac Road/State Route 74 (SR-74)/Nichols Road Corridor Project (PROJECT). The PROJECT is a critically important intra-county route. It connects the Cities of Hemet, San Jacinto, Menifee, Perris and Lake Elsinore, and the unincorporated communities of Winchester, Homeland, Romoland, Goodhope, Meadowbrook, and Warm Springs. The PROJECT and the Cajalco/Ramona Expressway are planned to function as the primary east -west, nonfreeway arterial routes that are centrally located to serve all of Western Riverside County. The corridor to be studied would include the two-mile missing link, bridge crossing, grade separation, and new road. The study will need to be a comprehensive corridor study that evaluates multimodal options including transit and active transportation concepts, as these mobility options are essential components of a comprehensive system. It is anticipated that construction of the project will be funded in part with federal funds. It is assumed that SR-74 between the future Nichols Road and Ethanac Road is considered relinquished to the COUNTY for the preparation of PROJECT deliverables identified in Phase I Services. PROJECT LOCATION: i u LAKE ELSINORE NICHOLS ROAD �EXIEHALMI 17336.00001\29018368.1 PERRIS ETRANAC —S.Ali arSu*xo eavEq a ETHANAC ROAD EAST EVAPcr4: ROAD GAfi CLCSURE 0ONNECIIO11 Exhibit B MENIFEE 119 PROJECT FUNDING: PHASE New Corridors Fund LOCAL TOTAL PSRE $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $3,000,000 TOTAL $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $3,000,000 PROJECT MILESTONES — provide a list of phases and milestones for completion of the improvements and estimated dates when each is expected to be accomplished. - county to provide - 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit B 120 EXHIBIT "C" PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL, CONSIDERATION AND PAYMENT OF INVOICES 1. RCTC recommends that the County incorporate Exhibit "C-1" into its contracts with any subcontractors to establish a standard method for preparation of invoices by contractors to the County and ultimately to RCTC for reimbursement of County contractor costs. 2. Each month the County shall submit an invoice for eligible Work costs incurred during the preceding month. The original invoice shall be submitted to RCTC's Executive Director with a copy to RCTC's Project Coordinator. Each invoice shall be accompanied by a cover letter in a format substantially similar to that of Exhibit "C-2". 3. Each invoice shall include documentation from each contractor used by the County for the Work, listing labor costs, subcontractor costs, and other expenses. Each invoice shall also include a monthly progress report and spreadsheets showing the hours or amounts expended by each contractor or consultant for the month and for the entire Work to date. A sample progress report is attached as Exhibits "C-4". All documentation from the County's contractors should be accompanied by a cover letter in a format substantially similar to that of Exhibit "C-3". 4. If the County is seeking reimbursement for direct expenses incurred by County staff for eligible Work costs, the County shall detail the same level of information for its labor and any expenses in the same level of detail as required of contractors pursuant to Exhibit "C" and its attachments. 5. Charges for each task and milestone listed in Exhibit "A" shall be listed separately in the invoice. 6. Each invoice shall include a certification signed by the County Representative or his or her designee which reads as follows: "I hereby certify that the hours and salary rates submitted for reimbursement in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the consultants or contractors listed. Signed Title Date Invoice No. 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit C 121 7. RCTC will pay the County within 30 days after receipt by the Commission of an invoice. If RCTC disputes any portion of an invoice, payment for that portion will be withheld, without interest, pending resolution of the dispute, but the uncontested balance will be paid. 8. The final payment under this Agreement will be made only after: (i) the County has obtained a Release and Certificate of Final Payment from each contractor or consultant used on theWork; (ii) the County has executed a Release and Certificate of Final Payment; and (iii) the County has provided copies of each such Release to RCTC. 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit C 122 EXHIBIT "C-1" ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION For the satisfactory performance and completion of the Work under this Agreement, County will pay the Consultant compensation as set forth herein. The total compensation for this service shall not exceed ( INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT ) ($_INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT ) without written approval of County's County Engineer ("Total Compensation"). 1. ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION. Compensation for the Work will be comprised of the following elements: 1.1 Direct Labor Costs; 1.2 Fixed Fee; and 1.3 Additional Direct Costs. 1.1 DIRECT LABOR COSTS. Direct Labor costs shall be paid in an amount equal to the product of the Direct Salary Costs and the Multiplier which are defined as follows: 1.1.1 DIRECT SALARY COSTS Direct Salary Costs are the base salaries and wages actually paid to the Consultant's personnel directly engaged in performance of the Work under the Agreement. (The range of hourly rates paid to the Consultant's personnel appears in Section 2 below.) 1.1.2 MULTIPLIER The Multiplier to be applied to the Direct Salary Costs to determine the Direct Labor Costs is , and is the sum of the following components: 1.1.2.1 Direct Salary Costs 1.1.2.2 Payroll Additives The Decimal Ratio of Payroll Additives to Direct Salary Costs. Payroll Additives include all employee benefits, allowances for vacation, sick leave, and holidays, and company portion of employee insurance and social and retirement benefits, all federal and state payroll taxes, premiums for insurance which are measured by payroll costs, and other contributions and benefits imposed by applicable laws and regulations. 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit "C-1" 123 1.1.2.3 Overhead Costs The Decimal ratio of Allowable Overhead Costs to the Consultant Firm's Total Direct Salary Costs. Allowable Overhead Costs include general, administrative and overhead costs of maintaining and operating established offices, and consistent with established firm policies, and as defined in the Federal Acquisitions Regulations, Part 31.2. Total Multiplier (sum of 1.1.2.1,1.1.2.2, and 1.1.2.3) 1.2 FIXED FEE. 1.2.1 A Fixed Fee of shall be paid to Consultant for Consultant's complete and satisfactory performance of this Agreement and all Services required. The Fixed Fee shall be paid in monthly installments based upon the percentage of the Services completed at the end of each billing period, as determined in the sole discretion of the County. Consultant shall not be entitled to and shall forfeit any portion of the Fixed Fee not earned as provided herein. 1.2.2 A pro-rata share of the Fixed Fee shall be applied to the total Direct Labor Costs expended for services each month, and shall be included on each monthly invoice. 1.3 ADDITIONAL DIRECT COSTS. Additional Direct Costs directly identifiable to the performance of the services of this Agreement shall be reimbursed at the rates below, or at actual invoiced cost. Rates for identified Additional Direct Costs are as follows: ITEM REIMBURSEMENT RATE [ insert charges J Per Diem $ /day Car mileage $ /mile Travel $ /trip Computer Charges $ /hour Photocopies $ /copy Blueline $ /sheet LD Telephone $ /call Fax $ /sheet Photographs $ /sheet Travel by air and travel in excess of 100 miles from the Consultant's office nearest to County's office must have County's prior written approval to be reimbursed under this 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit "C-1" 124 Agreement. 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit "C-1" 125 2. DIRECT SALARY RATES Direct Salary Rates, which are the range of hourly rates to be used in determining Direct Salary Costs in Section 1.1.1 above, are given below and are subject to the following: 2.1 Direct Salary Rates shall be applicable to both straight time and overtime work, unless payment of a premium for overtime work is required by law, regulation or craft agreement, or is otherwise specified in this Agreement. In such event, the premium portion of Direct Salary Costs will not be subject to the Multiplier defined in Paragraph 1.1.2 above. 2.2 Direct Salary Rates shown herein are in effect for one year following the effective date of the Agreement. Thereafter, they may be adjusted annually to reflect the Consultant's adjustments to individual compensation. The Consultant shall notify County in writing prior to a change in the range of rates included herein, and prior to each subsequent change. POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION RANGE OF HOURLY RATES [ sample J Principal $ .00 - $ .00/hour Project Manager $ .00 - $ .00/hour Sr. Engineer/Planner $ .00 - $ .00/hour Project Engineer/Planner $ .00 - $ .00/hour Assoc. Engineer/Planner $ .00 - $ .00/hour Technician $ .00 - $ .00/hour Drafter/CADD Operator $ .00 - $ .00/hour Word Processor $ .00 - $ .00/hour 2.3 The above rates are for the Consultant only. All rates for subconsultants to the Consultant will be in accordance with the Consultant's cost proposal. 3. INVOICING. 17336.000 3.1 Each month the Consultant shall submit an invoice for Work performed during the preceding month. The original invoice shall be submitted to County's County Engineer with two (2) copies to County's Project Coordinator. 3.2 Charges shall be billed in accordance with the terms and rates included herein, unless otherwise agreed in writing by County's Representative. Exhibit "C-1" 01\29018368.1 126 3.3 Base Work and Extra Work shall be charged separately, and the charges for each task and Milestone listed in the Scope of Work, shall be listed separately. The charges for each individual assigned by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be listed separately on an attachment to the invoice. 3.4 A charge of $500 or more for any one item of Additional Direct Costs shall be accompanied by substantiating documentation satisfactory to County such as invoices, telephone logs, etc. 3.5 Each copy of each invoice shall be accompanied by a Monthly Progress Report and spreadsheets showing hours expended by task for each month and total project to date. 3.6 Each invoice shall indicate payments to DBE subconsultants or supplies by dollar amount and as a percentage of the total invoice. 3.7 Each invoice shall include a certification signed by the Consultant's Representative or an officer of the firm which reads as follows: I hereby certify that the hours and salary rates charged in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the employees listed. Signed Title Date Invoice No. 4. PAYMENT 4.1 County shall pay the Consultant within four to six weeks after receipt by County of an original invoice. Should County contest any portion of an invoice, that portion shall be held for resolution, without interest, but the uncontested balance shall be paid. The final payment for Work under this Agreement will be made only after the Consultant has executed a Release and Certificate of Final Payment. 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit "C-1" 127 EXHIBIT "C-2" Sample Cover Letter to RCTC Date Ms. Anne Mayer Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 ATTN: Accounts Payable Re: Project Title - Invoice #_ Enclosed for your review and payment approval is the County of 's invoice for professional and technical services that was rendered by our contractors in connection with the Agreement No. effective (Month/Day/Year). The required support documentation received from each contractor is included as backup to the invoice. Invoice period covered is from Month/Date/Year to Month/Date/Year. Total Authorized Agreement Amount: Total Invoiced to Date: Total Previously Invoiced: Balance Remaining: Amount due this Invoice: $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 I certify that the hours and salary rates charged in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the contractors listed. By: Name Title cc: 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit "C-2" 128 EXHIBIT "C-3" Sample Letter from Contractor to County/County Month/Date/Year Attn: Accounts Payable Invoice # For [type of services] rendered by [contractor name] in connection with [name of project] This is per agreement No. XX-XX-XXX effective Month/Date/Year. Invoice period covered is from Month/Date/Year to Month/Date/Year. Total Base Contract Amount: Authorized Extra Work (if Applicable) $000,000.00 S000,000.00 TOTAL AUTHORIZED CONTRACT AMOUNT: $000,000.00 Total Invoice to Date: Total Previously Billed: Balance Remaining: Amount Due this Invoice: $000,000.00 $000,000.00 $000,000.00 $000,000.00 I certify that the hours and salary rates charged in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the employees listed, By: Name Title 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit "C-3" 129 EXHIBIT C-4 Sample Progress Report REPORTING PERIOD: Month/Date/Year to Month/Date/Year PROGRESS REPORT: #1 A. Activities and Work Completed during Current Work Periods TASK O1 — 100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 1. Responded to Segment 1 comments from Department of Transportation 2. Completed and submitted Segment 1 final PS&E B. Current/Potential Problems Encountered & Corrective Action Problems None C. Work Planned Next Period Corrective Action None TASK O1 — 100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 1. Completing and to submit Traffic Signal and Electrical Design plans 2. Responding to review comments 17336.00001\29018368.1 Exhibit C-4 130 AGENDA ITEM 8F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Eric DeHate, Management Analyst LoreIle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2017-21 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the Fiscal Years 2017-21 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Measure A provides member agencies with local funding for street maintenance and operations, street repairs, street improvements, and new infrastructure of their local streets and roads systems. Since the commencement of the 2009 Measure A in July 2009 through March 31, 2016, the cities and the county of Riverside received over $286 million. Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies in order to receive LSR funds. First, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and the county must participate in either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Western County agencies must also participate in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) managed by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). Staff received confirmations from CVAG for its TUMF program and from RCA for the Western County MSHCP; confirmation from WRCOG for its TUMF program has not yet been received. Additionally, agencies are required to annually provide to the Commission a project status report for the prior year CIP, a five-year CIP detailing how the Measure A funds are to be expended, and an annual certification of maintenance of effort. On February 8, 2016, staff provided the local agencies with a five-year Measure A revenue projection for LSR to assist in preparation of the required CIP. The required CIPs and supporting documentation have been received from all of the participating Measure A agencies and have Agenda Item 8F 131 been reviewed by staff to ensure compliance with Measure A requirements. Staff recommends approval of the FYs 2017-21 Measure A Five -Year CIPs. The FY 2016/17 Measure A LSR disbursements to eligible local agencies with Commission - approved CIPs are expected to commence in September 2016. Eligibility determinations related to participation in TUMF and MSHCP programs, as applicable, is complete for Coachella Valley agencies; for Western County agencies, eligibility determination is dependent on receipt of WRCOG's TUMF certification, which is expected prior to the initial FY 2016/17 Measure A LSR disbursement. Attachment: Five -Year FYs 2017-21 Measure A Five -Year CIPs — Posted on Commission Website Agenda Item 8F 132 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF BANNING FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 2 F- a_ Public Works Department STAGECOACH TOWN 'USA ................................................... ESTABLISHED 1913 May 4, 2016 Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Alvarez: The City of Banning respectfully submits its Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2016/2017 -- 2020/2021 as approved by the City Council during its regular meeting on April 12, 2016. Also enclosed with this letter you will find the City's MOE Certification Statement, Project Status Reports for FY 2014/2015 and FY 2015/2016 along with a certified copy of the Resolution approving the Five -Year Measure "A" CIP Plan. Please note that the Project Status Report for projects listed in the FY 2014/2015 CIP have been revised to delete the A.C. Overlay project on Cherry Street from Hoffer Street to George Street. Additionally, Project Status Report for projects listed in the FY 2015/2016 CIP have been revised to delete the Feasibility Study for Lincoln Street from Sunset Avenue to Highland Home Road. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at (951) 922-3130. Sincerely, Art Vela, P.E. Director of Public Works Copy: File Enc. Certified Resolution Five -Year Measure "A" Plan Project Status Reports MOE Certification Statement 99 B. Ramsey St. ® P.O. Box 998 ® Banning, CA 92220-0998 ® (951) 922-3130 0 Fax (951) 922-3141 RESOLUTION NO.2016-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEASURE "A" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, in 1988, Riverside County voters approved a 0.5% sales tax (Measure "A") over a 20-year span to be used toward improvements of state highways, local transit systems, and public streets; and WHEREAS, in 2002, Riverside County voters approved a 30-year extension of the Measure "A" 0.5% sales tax; and WHEREAS, each City in Riverside County is required by the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") to submit a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (attached as Exhibit "A"), as approved by its governing board, to indicate how Measure "A" firnding is to be utilized over the next five years; and WHEREAS, the RCTC has estimated that the City of Banning will receive a total of $2,979,000.00 in Measure "A" funds over the next five years; and WHEREAS, the program is intended to support local transit systems, street pavement rehabilitation and public street improvements; and WHEREAS, the Measure "A" Ordinance requires annual certification that discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation -related construction and maintenance activities for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 will meet or exceed the Maintenance of Effort Certification ("MOE") base year amount and commitment to expending Measure "A" funds to projects identified in the City's Five Year CIP; and WHEREAS, the priority list of street locations can be changed by the City Council by submitting a written request to RCTC; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows: SECTION 1. City Council adopts Resolution No. 2016-26, "Approving the Measure `A' Five Year Capital Improvement Plan." SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. Reso. No. 2016-26 1 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2016. ATTEST: Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT: ithony R. Aleshire & Wy a , City der, LLP Arthur L. Welp , Mayor City of Banning CERTIFICATION: I, Marie A. Calderon, City Cleric of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, No. 2016- 26 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of April, 2016, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmembers Franklin, Moyer, Peterson, Mayor Welch NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Miller ABSTAIN: None Reso. No. 2016-26 Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk City of Banning, California 2 CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CRlt; NAL DOCUMENT ON FILE Its HE i1FFIG*. O ieti CITY MIRK, BY Vn 11 TITLE HATE -1--- 34 5 FY 2016/2017 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the CITY OF BANNING (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure "A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $ 164,325.00, approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2012 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary Local Funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure "A" funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 741-Pri , 2016 Reso. No. 20 i 6-26 Michael Rock, City Manager Attest: City Clerk 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015/2016 Agency: City of Banning Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-2946 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nicolet Street: Sims Street to Sunset Avenue FTIP: Ramsey Street: Hargrave Street to East City Limits Nicolet Street: McGovern Ave to Sunset Avenue Nicolet Street: Sims Street to 8th Street Ramsey Street: San Gorgonio Avenue to 4th Street City Wide Slurry Seal AC Overlay AC Overlay AC Overlay AC Overlay AC Overlay Slurry Seal $310,000.00 $477,000.00 $45,000.00 $120,000.00 $300,000.00 $110,000.00 $310,000.00 $295,000.00 $45,000.00 $120,000.00 $300,000.00 $110,000.00 12/1/2016 7/1/2017 12/1/2016 12/1/2016 12/1/2016 12/1/2016 Scheduled to bid in June, 2016. Environmental hold up Scheduled to bid in June, 2016. Scheduled to bid in June, 2016. Scheduled to bid in June, 2016. Scheduled to bid in June, 2016. TOTALS $1,362,000.00 $1,180,000.00 Note: An amendment is requested to replace "Feasibility Study: Lincoln Street - Sunset Ave to Highland Home Road" with new Item No. 3 "Nicolet Street: McGovern Ave to Sunset Avenue" and "Cherry Street: Hoffer Street to George Street' with new Item No. 4 "Nicolet Street: Sims Street to 8th Street' to the approved FY 2015/16 CIP. 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016/2017 Agency: City of Banning Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-29-16 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016/2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016/2017 Projects: 017 $1,465,222.00 $535,000.00 $1,180,000.00 $820,222.00 $569,000.00 $1,389,222.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 City -Wide Various Streets Improvements (Theodore St.: Alessandro Rd to Almond Way, 8th Street: Lincoln St to Westward AVe, Charles Street: Hargrave Ave to 1037 E. Charles St., and Wesley Street: Hargrave Ave to 1041 E. Wesley St.) AC Overlay $546,000.00 $546,000.00 TOTALS $546,000.00 $546,000.00 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017/2018 Agency: City of Banning Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-29-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018/2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017/2018 Projects: $843,222.00 $580,000.00 $1,423,222.00 Item No. _ Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Sun Lakes Boulevard: Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue Environmental Document and Plans, Specs and Estimates Only $1,325,384.77 $1,325,384.77 TOTALS $1,325,384.77 $1,325,384.77 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018/2019 Agency: City of Banning Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-29-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018/2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018/2019 Projects: 2019 $97,837.23 $592,000.00 $689,837.23 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Cottonwood Road: 8th Street to 12th Street AC Overlay $100,000.00 $100,000.00 2 George Street: 8th Street to 12th Street AC Overlay $100,000.00 $100,000.00 3 10th Street: Williams Street to George AC Overlay $115,000.00 $115,000.00 Street 4 12th Street Williams Street to George Street AC Overlay $122,000.00 $122,000.00 5 14th Street: Williams Street to George AC Overlay $120,000.00 $120,000.00 Street TOTALS $557,000.00 $557,000.00 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019/2020 Agency: City of Banning Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-29-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019/2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019/2020 Projects: FY 2019/2020 $132,837.23 $610,000.00 $742, 837.23 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Indian School Lane: 8th Street to San AC Overlay $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Gorgonio Avenue 2 Lincoln Street: San Gorgonio Avenue to AC Overlay $300,000.00 $300,000.00 Hargrave Street 3 City Wide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal $91,000.00 $91,000.00 TOTALS $591,000.00 $591,000.00 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020/2021 Agency: City of Banning Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-29-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020/2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020/2021 Projects: FY 2019/2020 $151,837.23 $628,000.00 $779,837.23 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Monroe Street: 22nd St to Jefferson St AC Overlay/Rehab $100,000.00 $100,000.00 2 Jefferson Street: Monroe St to 22nd St AC Overlay/Rehab $90,000.00 $90,000.00 3 Lincoln Street: Sunset Ave to 22nd St. AC Overlay $180,000.00 $180,000.00 George Street: Hargrave St to Hathaway $140,000.00 $140,000.00 4 St AC Overlay 5 Citywide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal $120,000.00 $120,000.00 TOTALS $630,000.00 $630,000.00 12 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF BLYTHE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 14 CITY OF BLYTHE DEPARIIVENT OF PUBUC WORKS /M O SOUTH MAIN STREET BLYTHE, CALIFORNIA 92225-2717 PHONE (760) 922-6611 FAX (760) 922-0278 May 9, 2016 Grace Alvarez Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92505-2208 Subject: City of Blythe Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2016/17. Dear Ms. Alvarez, Enclosed please find the City of Blythe Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2016/2017, Maintenance of Efforts Certification FY 2016/2017, and Project Status Report for CIP FY 2015/2016. The submittal for FY 2016/2017 incorporates a balance carried over from the 2012 and 2014 State Transportation Improvement Program trade for local Measure A funds. Since Arman o : a dizzone, .E. Director of Public Works, City of Blythe Enclosures 15 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Blythe (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $170,000, revised by the Commission on April 13, 2016, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: Sib , 2016 Mid" CA-eAdtv.) CITY MANGER ATTEST: -I- l.L ^ i SECRETAR 16 Agency: City of Blythe Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: June 10, 2016 CITY OF BLYTHE FIVE-YEAR C/P RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 FY 2014/15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015/16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015/16 Project Status Report Expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 3,308,947 928,000 25,600 4,211,347 942,000 5,153, 347 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $150,000 $150,000 2 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $125,000 $100,000 TH Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and 3 14 Ave. from Lovekin Blvd to Braodway drainage $407,000 $407,000 4 N and S Broadway from 14th Ave to Chanslorway Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and drainage $1,200,000 $652,706 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) $215,300 $215,300 6 Administrative Overhead $75,360 $75,360 TOTALS $1, 600,366 Estimated Prior Year STIP Trade Balance: $926,294 Estimated FY 2012 STIP Allocation: Estimated FY 2014 STIP Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016/17 Projects: $926,294 $0 $0 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost STIP Trade Funds 2016-2017 7 N and S Broadway from 14th Ave to Chanslorway Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and drainage $1,200,000 $547,294 8 N Broadway From Juniper Trail to 10the Ave Grind and Overlay (STIP Trade) $379,000 $379,000 TOTALS $926,294 17 Agency: City of Blythe Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: June 10, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $3,552,981 $961,000 $4,513,981 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $150,000 $50,000 2 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $150,000 $100,000 3 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys $100,000 $50,000 4 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $100,000 $50,000 6 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment m Debt Service (2009/2019) Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and $215,200 $215,200 7 7 Street from Barnard Street to Chanslorway drainage $312,480 $312,480 8 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation (various locations) $25,000 $25,000 9 Administrative Overhead $76,880 $76,880 TOTALS $879,560 Estimated Prior Year STIP Trade Balance: $0 18 Agency: City of Blythe Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: June 10, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $3,634,421 $980, 000 $4,614,421 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $150,000 $50,000 2 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys $100,000 $50,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $100,000 $60,000 4 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $150,000 $60,000 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) $215,200 $215,200 6 Acacia Street from Hobsonway to Barnard Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and drainage $622,700 $622,700 7 Administrative Overhead $78,400 $78,400 TOTALS $1,136,300 19 Agency: City of Blythe Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: June 10, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $3,478,121 $1,009,000 $4,487,121 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $150,000 $50,000 2 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys $100,000 $50,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $100,000 $60,000 4 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $150,000 $60,000 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) $215,200 $215,200 6 Date St. From Hobsonway to Barnard Blvd. Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and drainage $489,000 $489,000 7 Administrative Overhead $80,720 $80,720 TOTALS $1,004,920 20 Agency: City of Blythe Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: June 10, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020 - 2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020 - 2021 Projects: $3,482,201 $1,039,000 $4,521,201 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020 - 2021 1 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Grind and ovelay, curb gutter and sidewalks $150,000 $50,000 2 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys $100,000 $50,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance $100,000 $60,000 4 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance $150,000 $60,000 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) $215,200 $215,200 6 Defrain Blvd. from 10th Ave. to 4th Ave. Phase 1 of 2) AC pavement, thick overlay $983,500 $983,500 7 Administrative Overhead $83,120 $83,120 TOTALS $1,501,820 21 ATTACHMENT D **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Blythe Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: May 11, 2015 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated Completion Status 1 1998/16 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (25,000/yr) Construction $25 $10 June 2016 90% completed 2 2015/16 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project Construction $0 $0 June 2016 Annual improvements 3 2015/16 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Construction $35 $15 June 2016 Annual improvements 4 2015/16 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Construction $100 $0 June 2016 Annual project 5 2014/15 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Construction $100 $45 June 2016 Annual Stock Material 6 2009/19 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment (Debt Service) Debt Payment $215 $215 Sept 2019 Last payment due Sept 2019 7 2015/16 E Barnard St. from 2nd St to Birch St. Construction $822 $822 June 2016 In progress 80% completed 8 2015/16 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation (various locations) Rehabilitation $50 $46 June 2016 In progress 30% completed 9 2014/15 Administrative Overhead Administrative Overhead $74 $74 June 2016 Annual admin charges 12 2014/15 E Barnard St. from 2nd St to Birch St. Engineering $48 $48 May2016 Completed 13 2014/15 W. Rice St. from S. Willow Ave. to S. Lovekin Blvd. Engineering $21 $21 Sept 2015 Completed 14 2014/15 14TH Ave. from Lovekin Blvd to Braodway Engineering $42 $42 Sept 2015 Completed 15 2014/15 Broadway from 14TH Ave. to Hobsonway Engineering $58 $58 Sept 2015 Completed 16 2014/15 7th St. from Barnard St to Chanslorway Engineering $26 $26 Sept 2015 Completed 17 2015/16 W. Rice St. from S. Willow Ave. to S. Lovekin Blvd. Construction $296 $106 March 2016 Completed TOTALS $1,912 $1,529 Item Total Cost STIP Funds Estimated No. Project Name / Limits Project Type ($000's) ($000's) Completion Status 10 2015/16 N Braodway from Juniper to 10th Avenue Construction (STIP Trade) $324 $0 June 2016 Annual project 11 2015/16 W Rice from S Willow Ave to S lovekin Blvd Construction (STIP Trade) $296 $190 March 2016 Completed 22 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CALIMESA FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 24 City of Calimesa May 5, 2016 Grace Alvarez Riverside County Transportation Commission Planning and Programming Manager 4080 Lemon St., 3rd Floor Riverside, Ca 92501 Re: City of Calimesa Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2017-2021 Dear Ms. Alvarez: Enclosed please find the City of Calimesa Measure A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2017-2021, Maintenance of Effort Certification for Fiscal Year 2016-17 and the Project Status Report for Fiscal Year 2015-16. Please let me know if you should have any questions. Sincerely, 444.4,4..? Bonnie Johnso City Manager 908 Park Avenue • Calimesa, California 92320 • (909) 795-9801 25 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Calimesa (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,401, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 5, 2016 BONNIE JOHNS TY MANAGER ATtST: )(MA FDA LENE GERDES, CRETARY 26 ATTACHMENT 8 FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Bob French, Public Works Director Phone #: (909) 795-9801 Date: May 5, 2016 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016.2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 1,282, 773 152,000 725,939 708,834 164,000 872,834 Item No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 2084 Calimesa Blvd Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation (2015-16) 260,000 260,000 2084 Calimesa Blvd Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation (2016-17) 71,000 71,000 2067 5th Street Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation (2016-17) 156,000 156,000 2065 Donna Lane Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation (2016-17) 83,000 83,000 0000 Indirect Costs -Administration Indirect Costs 13,120 13,120 TOTALS 583,120 583,120 Note: Fiscal Year monies for 2015-16 : 2010, 2068 and 2078 combined into one project - Rehabilitation of Calimesa Blvd. (2084) 27 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Bob French, Public Works Director Phone #: (909) 795-9801 Date: May 5, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 289,714 167,000 456,714 Item No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 2066 Brady Lane Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 73,000 73,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 13,360 13,360 TOTALS 86,360 86,360 28 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Bob French, Public Works Director Phone #: (909) 795-9801 Date: May 5, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 370,354 170,000 540,354 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 TBD Barnes Court Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 42,000 42,000 TBD Ward Lane Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 41,000 41,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 13,600 13,600 TOTALS 96,600 96,600 29 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Bob French, Public Works Director Phone #: (909) 795-9801 Date: May 5, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 443,754 175,000 618,754 Ttem No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 TBD Avenue L Slurry Seal Pavement Slurry 77,000 77,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 14,000 14,000 TOTALS 91,000 91,000 30 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 5of 6 Prepared by: Bob French, Public Works Director Phone #: (909) 795-9801 Date: May 5, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 527,754 180,000 707,754 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 TBD California Street Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 92,000 92,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 14,400 14,400 TOTALS 106,400 106,400 31 ATTACHMENT D **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT"* RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Calimesa Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Bob Fench, Public Works Dir( Phone #: (909) 795-9801 Date: May 5, 2016 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (5000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated! Actual Completion Status 2062 SR2S - 2nd St. and Avenue L Pedestrian Improvements 1,235,258 373,037 June 2016 In Progress 2062 Roundabout - 2nd St/County Line Pedestrian Improvements 560,000 17,240 Not known Delayed indefinitely 2076 Desert Lawn Drive (Cherry Valley to Desert lawn Cemetery) Pavement Rehabilitation 292,443 292,443 September 2015 Completed 2068 Citywide Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation 100,000 5,000 September 2016 Preparing Specs 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation 125,000 5,000 September 2016 Preparing Specs 2010 Citywide Pavement Striping Pavement Rehabilitation 50,000 5,000 September 2016 Preparing Specs San Timoteo Canyon Rd. 2080 (emergency work) Pavement Rehabilitation 16,059 16,059 January 2016 Completed 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 12,160 12,160 June 2016 Compieted TOTALS 2,410,920 725,939 Note: 2010, 2068 and 2078 are being combined into one project - Rehabilitation of Calimesa Blvd. Note: 2062 has been split between SR2S project and roudabout. Roudabout has been delayed indefinitely. 32 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CANYON LAKE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 34 CITY OF CANYON LAKE FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: Grace FROM: Wichelte Gomez COMPANY: DATE: RCTC 06/01 /2016 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 6 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S EMAIL: accountant@ctofcanyon&ke.com RE: SENDER'S PHONE: SENDER'S FAX: Maintenance of Effort Certification 951-244-2955 951-246-2022 ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: Transmitting the CIP FY 2017 through 2021, Maintenance of Effort Certification, and Project Status Report for FY 2016/17 Thank you - Michelle Gomez Accountant 31516 RAILROAD CANYON ROAD CANYON LAKE, CA 92587 951-244-2955 951-246-n22 FAX FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Canyon Lake (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $28,873, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: I act:, , 2016 0)9 _Rpinv-, CITY MANAGER ATTEST: S CRETAR 36 ATTACHMENT B FIVE-YEAR CIP FORMAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (310) 629-9339 Date: May 24, 2016 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 262 $172 $137 $297 $179 $476 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 58 58 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signa 250 175 Maint, Landscaping, Lighting, and Signage Improvements TOTALS 392 317 37 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (310) 629-9339 Date: May 24, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 159 183 342 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 63 63 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, SignE 80 32 Maint, and Other Maint TOTALS 227 179 38 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (310) 629-9339 Date: May 24, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 163 187 350 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 84 84 2 Debt Service to County 63 63 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Sign, Maint, and Other Maint 100 37 TOTALS 247 184 39 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (310) 629-9339 Date: May 24, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 166 193 359 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 19 19 2 Debt Service to County 27 27 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Sign; 100 43 Maint, and Other Maint TOTALS 146 89 40 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (310) 629-9339 Date: May 24, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 270 199 469 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 0 0 2 Debt Service to County 0 0 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signs 100 100 Maint, and Other Maint TOTALS 100 100 41 ATTACHMENT D **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (310) 629-9339 Date: May24, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anaapaiea Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan 557 84 N/A On -going loan payment on Railroad Cyn Rd. 2 Debt Service to County 53 53 N/A On -going load payment on pavement rehab 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signe 120 0 On -going, other funds used Maint, and Other Maint TOTALS 730 137 42 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CATHEDRAL CITY FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 44 itt Cathedral City May 4, 2016 Riverside County Transportation Commission Attention Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Re: MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS REVENUE PROJECTIONS, MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION, and FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (FYs 2016/17 — 2020/21 Dear Ms. Alvarez: The City of Cathedral City is pleased to submit documentation in support of the above referenced request. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, 76‹ ✓ Bill Simons Senior Engineer 68-700 AVENIDA LALO GUERRERO • CATHEDRA45CITY, CA 92234 • 760/770-0360 • FAX: 760/202-1460 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Cathedral City (the Agency) that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No, 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure A) shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $391,688, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated I'llOk,i iD ,2016 (. CITY MANAGER ATTEST: SECRETAR4 46 ATTACHMENT B SAMPLE FIVE-YEAR CIP FORMAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: Cathedral City Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $952,725 $1,427,000 $1,463,000 $916,725 $1,443,000 $2,359,725 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $1,350,000 $1,057,300 Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and Proposed Projects) Various transportation related Projects 2 Cathedral Canyon Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitaion $500,000 $208,000 3 Date Palm Drive Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitaion $750,000 $326,000 4 Vista Chino Median Curb Construction Safety Improvements $3,600,000 $450,000 5 San Joaquin Sidewalk Construction Safety Improvements $150,000 $100,000 TOTALS $6,350,000 $2,141,300 47 Agency: Cathedral City Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 218,425 1472000 1,690,425 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $1,425,000 $1,110,200 Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and Proposed Projects) Various transportation related Projects 2 Pavement Management Preventive Maintenance $450,000 $50,000 TOTALS $1,875,000 $1,160,200 48 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Cathedral City Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 530,225 1501000 2,031,225 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $1,500,000 $1,165,700 Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and Proposed Projects) Various transportation related Projects 2 Pavement Management Preventive Maintenance $500,000 $300,000 TOTALS $2,000,000 $1,465,700 49 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Cathedral City Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 565,525 1546000 2,111,525 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $1,510,000 $1,224,000 Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and Proposed Projects) Various transportation related Projects 2 Pavement Management Preventive Maintenance $500,000 $300,000 TOTALS $2,010,000 $1,524,000 50 Agency: Cathedral City Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 587,525 1592000 2,179,525 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $1,525,000 $1,285,200 Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and Proposed Projects) Various transportation related Projects 2 Pavement Management Preventive Maintenance $500,000 $300,000 TOTALS $2,025,000 $1,585,200 51 ATTACHMENT D **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: Cathedral City Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: (760) 770-0360 Date: Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Public Works Department City wide maintenance operations including pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $1,350,000 $1,350,000 Capital Improvement Projects (Ongoing and Proposed Projects) 2 ADA Transition Plan $22,000 $22,000 November 2015 Complete 3 Cathedral Canyon Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation $500,000 $42,000 October 2016 Design Phase 4 Date Palm Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation $750,000 $49,000 October 2016 Design Phase TOTALS $2,622,000 $1,463,000 52 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF COACHELLA FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 54 F COA June 14, 2016 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street 3`d Floor PO Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: City of Coachella's Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2016/17 — FY 2020/21 Dear Ms. Trevino: Please find enclosed the Fiscal Year 2016/17 — 2020/21 Measure A Expenditure Plan for the City of Coachella. Also enclosed are the FY 15/16 Project Status Report and the City's MOE Certification Statement for FY 16117. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact myself Jonathan Hoy, P.E., City Engineer at jhoy(aAcoachella.org or Lynn Germain lgermain(cr�,coachella.org (760) 398-5744. Thank you, nathan Hoy, P. City Engineer City of Coachella 760-398-5744 55 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Coachella (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $92,205, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: ft/ d y 12016 ATTEST: amiAL& SECRETARY 56 ATTACHMENT B FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Coachella Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Jonathan Hoy P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 5-2-16 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $1,135,842 $627,000 $47,500 $1,715,342 $627,000 $2,342,342 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds (1) Tyler Street between Avenue 54 and Avenue 53 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as 2016-2017 required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement 605,000 590,000 Management Update. (2) Bridge and northbound Indio Blvd overcrossing In accordance with the CVAG Agreement, the City of Coachella is 2016-2017 responsible for a portion to be reimbursed for the construction of the 179,600 71,240 Interchange. (3) Avenue 52 from Harrison Street to Shady Lane The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the 2016-2017 installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement 300,000 300,000 Management Update. (4) Installation of five new traffic signals with street repair on Van Buren & Avenue 52, Van Buren & Avenue 51, Avenue 50 and Frederick, Avenue 50 and Calhoun, and The project will improve street surface and the installation of handicap ramps as required. This project will eliminate four way stops to improve traffic flow 2016-2017 Avenue 49 and Van Buren and safety of motor vehicles. 1,950,000 225,000 (5) Pavement Management Program This project will update the payment 2016-2017 Update management system to identify future street projects 35,000 35,000 TOTALS 3,069,600 1,221,240 57 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Coachella Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Jonathan Hoy P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 5-2-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 1,121,102 640,000 1,761,102 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds (1) 14 locations of bike lanes, crosswalks, pathways for pedestrians, sidewalks, and asphalt work; Van Buren from Ave 52 to Ave 53, Van Buren on Ave 53 to Calle La Paz, Shady Lane from Ave 52 to Ave 53, Ave 55 to Van Buren, Ave 55 to existing sidewalk, Van Buren from The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or 2017-2018 Ave 54 to Ave 55, Ave 53 from Harrison to Shady Lane, Ave 53 Harrison to Tyler, Ave 53 and Calle La Paz, Ave 52 from Harrison to Calle Empalme, Ave 51 from replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. 2,731,000 531,000 Fredrick to Mecca, Ave 49 and Jazmine, Ave 49 from Fredrick to Grapefruit, Fredrick from Ave 49 to Mitchell. 2017-2018 (2) Street Resurfacing Naomi Court from La Ponderosa to East End The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 98,760 98,760 Pavement Management Update. 2017-2018 (3) Perez from Naomi Court to La Hernandez The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 91,865 91,865 Pavement Management Update. TOTALS 2,921,625 721,625 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Coachella Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Jonathan Hoy P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 5-2-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 1,039,477 653,000 1,692,477 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 2018-2019 (1) Romaulda from Perez to La Hernandez East End (2) Oritiz from Perez to La Hernandez; The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. 250,000 300,000 250,000 300,000 TOTALS 550,000 550,000 59 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Coachella Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Jonathan Hoy P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 5-2-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 1,142,477 673,000 1,815,477 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds (1) Via Conchilla from Avenida De Plata to Avenida De Platina The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new 2019-2020 overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 225,000 225,000 Pavement Management Update. (2) Avenida De oro from Ave. 50 to Guitron The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new 2019-2020 overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 233,000 233,000 Pavement Management Update. (3) Avenida Cortez from Ave. 50 to Calle Leon. The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new 2019-2020 overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 550,000 550,000 Pavement Management Update. TOTALS 1,008,000 1,008,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Coachella Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Jonathan Hoy P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 5-2-16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 807,477 693,000 1,500,477 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds (1) Calle Vega from Calle Leon to Paseo Laredo The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new 2020-2021 overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 245,000 245,000 Pavement Management Update. (2) Paseo De Laredo from Frederick to Avenida Cortez The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new 2020-2021 overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 129,000 129,000 Pavement Management Update. (3) Via Durango from Avenida Coez to End The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new 2020-2021 overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 100,000 100,000 Pavement Management Update. (4) Ave. 48 from Van Buren West 1/4 mile. The project will improve the street pavement throughout the City. This will include repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalks, new 2020-2021 overlay, and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 219,000 219,000 Pavement Management Update. TOTALS 693,000 693,000 ATTACHMENT D "*SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Jonathan Hoy, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: May 2, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 2015/2016 2015/2016 (1) Demolish existing bridge and northbound Indio Blvd overcrossing, replace with new six -lane bridge with bicycle lanes on each side and sidewalk on northbound side of Jefferson. Modify on and off -ramps; Westbound 1-10 realigned, on -ramp removed, realigned, two-lane on -ramp from southbound Jefferson, new two- lane loop on -ramp from northbound Jefferson; Eastbound 1-10 realigned, two lane off -ramp, existing on -ramp removed, new two-lane loop on -ramp add traffic signals eastbound and westbound on and off -ramps. (2) Improvements made to Tyler Street between Avenue 54 and Avenue 53 In accordance with the CVAG Agreement, the City of Coachella is responsible for a portion to be reimbursed for the construction of the Interchange. The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. 179,600 605,000 32,500 15,000 FY 16/17 FY 16/17 The CVAG agreement is ongoing and should be completed FY 16/17. Tyler Street Improvements is also on going and should be completed in FY 16/17 TOTALS 784,600 47,500 62 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF CORONA FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 64 NA LE CITY" Incorporated IuIY 13, 1896 (951) 736-2266 (951) 279-3627 (FAX) Nelson.Nelson@ci.corona.ca.0 May 3, 2016 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 400 SOUTH VICENTIA AVENUE, P.O. BOX 940, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879-0940 CITY HALL - ON LINE ALL THE TIME (http://www.discovercorona.conn) Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 D)ECEOV D - MAY 06 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMISSION SUBJECT: MEASURE A FIVE YEAR PLAN, MOE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT Ms. Trevino: The following documents are enclosed for your review: • Measure A proposed FY 2016/17 through 2020/21 Capital Improvements Plan • Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed certification statement • Program Status Report for current Fiscal Year 2015/16 • Measure A Annual Disbursement Projects received at the City The City's minimum MOE is set at $2,208,200; however, as of June 30, 2016, the City will have spent $7,314,100 from Measure A and $44,997,192 from other funds to support Measure A project expenditures. The document supporting the MOE calculations can be found attached, entitled "FY 2015/16 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures." The Measure A proposed FY 2016/17 through 2020/21 Capital Improvement Plan will be presented to our City Council for review at the Budget Workshop on May 26, 2016 and for adoption at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting on June 1, 2016. If you have any questions please contact Kim Sitton, Finance Manager at (951) 279-3532. Sincerely, elson D. Nelson, P.E. Public Works Director Attachments c: Kim Sitton, Finance Manager Theresa Daily, Financial Analyst 65 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for The City of Corona (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and base year amount of $2,208,200 approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: S - ` k --j Co , 2016 Darrell Talbert, City Manager 66 Agency: City of Corona Pagel of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 25, 2016 (Revised June 7, 2016) FIVE YEAR C1P RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure Balance: Estimated FY 2015.2016 Continuing Appropriation: MARA Appropriation (Foothill Project): Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Project: $ 1,738,109 10,308,385 13, 611, 680 4,146,000 $ 29, 804,174 MEASURE A FUNDS !tern No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost FY 15.16 Estimated Meas A Funds Carryover FY 16-17 Measure A Funds Estimated Measure A Approp Available 2015 Street Pavement Maintenance and 1 Rehabilitation Project Streets and Storm Drains $ 584,692 $ 584,692 $ - $ 584,692 2 Alley Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 685,338 195,557 100,000 295,557 3 Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Streets and Storm Drains 5,493,082 318,086 - 318,086 4 Chase Drive Improvmenls Phase III Streets and Storm Drains 868,599 400,000 - 400,000 5 Citywide Benchmark Streets and Storm Drains 180,000 40,000 - 40,000 Facilities, Systems and 6 Citywide GIS Master Plan Community Assets 123,297 34.996 - 34,996 7 Citywide Traffic Model Update Streets and Storm Drains 150,000 100,000 50,000 150,000 6 Corona Storm Drain Line 52 Streets and Storm Drains 5,569,806 700,000 - 700,000 9 Foothill Parkway Easterty Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 971,111 115.722 - 115,722 10 Foothill Parkway westerly Extension Streets and Storm Drains 28,393,626 13,611,680 - 13,6/1,680 Gilbert Avenue and Sheridan Circle Street 11 improvement Project Streets and Storm Drains 98,967 98,967 - 98,967 12 Green River Road Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 2,511,019 1.396,774 1,396.774 13 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 2,587,452 681,701 1,000,000 1,681,701 14 Magnolia Avenue Widening Streets and Storm Drains 681,819 275,498 400,000 675,498 15 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 3,328,253 2,460,128 500,000 2,960,128 16 McKinley Grade Separation Streets and Storm Drains 7,038,251 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Miscellaneous Repair and Replacement of Traffic 17 Signals Streets and Storm Drains 197,546 40,875 150,000 190,875 18 Ontario Avenue Street improvements Streets and Storm Drains 131.869 54.886 60,000 114.886 19 Overlook Street Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 727,945 250,000 50,000 300,000 20 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Streets and Storm Drains 638,177 318,272 150,000 468.272 21 Pavement Management Study Streets and Storm Drains 90,556 85,556 5,000 90,556 22 Safe Routes to School Cycle 3 Streets and Storm Drains 15,877 15,877 - 15,877 23 Sidewalk and ADA Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 1,531,003 1,131.003 400.000 1,531.003 24 Sidewalk Improvements 15-16 Streets and Storrs Drains 873,674 480,632 - 480,632 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter 25 RepairlReplacementlMaintenance Streets and Storm Drains 725,033 80,987 300,000 380.987 26 Sixth Street Revitalization Streets and Storm Drains 1.000,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 27 SR-91 City Betterments Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 200,000 100,000 300,000 28 Striping Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 498,176 248,176 150,000 398,176 29 Traffic Signals Lighting Upgrade Streets and Storm Drains 75,000 - 75,000 75,000 30 Cost Allocation Pian (Overhead) Operational Budget - 252,889 252,889 Totais: $ 66,070,168 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Balance: Note: Above list excludes projects anticipated to close by June 30, 2016. $ 23,920,065 $ 5,742,889 $ $ 29,662,954 141,220 67 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Corona Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 25, 2016 (Revised June 7, 2016) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 141,220 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 4,229,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Project: $ 4,370,220 ltem No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alley Improvements Streets and Storm Drains $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Chase Drive Improvements - Phase III Roads, Bridges and Freeways 200,000 200,000 3 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 939,872 4 Magnolia Avenue Widening Streets and Storm Drains 700,000 600,000 5 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 939,872 6 Overlook Street Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 50,000 50,000 7 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 300,000 8 Pavement Management Study Streets and Storm Drains 5,000 5,000 9 Sidewalk and ADA Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 400,000 400,000 10 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Streets and Storm Drains 600,000 300,000 11 Striping Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 350,000 200,000 12 Traffic Signals Lighting Upgrade Streets and Storm Drains 150,000 75,000 13 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 260,476 260,476 Total: $ 5,115,476 $ 4,370,220 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Balance: $ 0 68 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Corona Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 25, 2016 (Revised June 7, 2016) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: 4,314,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Project: $ 4,314,000 0 item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alley Improvements Streets and Storm Drains $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Magnolia Avenue Widening Streets and Storm Drains 700,000 600,000 4 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Overlook Street Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 50,000 50,000 6 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 150,000 7 Pavement Management Study Streets and Storm Drains 5,000 5,000 8 Sidewalk and ADA Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 400,000 400,000 9 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 150,000 10 Striping Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 325,000 175,000 11 Traffic Signals Lighting Upgrade Streets and Storm Drains 150,000 75,000 12 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 268,290 268,290 Total: $ 4,598,290 $ 3,973,290 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Balance: $ 340,710 69 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Corona Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: Apri125, 2016 (Revised June 7, 2016) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 340,710 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 4,443,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Project: $ 4,783,710 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alley Improvements Streets and Storm Drains $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Magnolia Avenue Widening Streets and Storm Drains 700,000 600,000 4 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Overlook Street Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 50,000 50,000 6 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Streets and Storrs Drains 300,000 150,000 7 Pavement Management Study Streets and Storm Drains 5,000 5,000 8 Sidewalk and ADA Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 400,000 400,000 9 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 150,000 10 Striping Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 325,000 175,000 11 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget 276,339 276,339 Total: $ 4,456,339 $ 3,906,339 Estimated FY 2019-20 Measure A Balance: $ 877,372 70 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Corona Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 25, 2016 (Revised June 7, 2016) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 877,372 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 4,576,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Project: $ 5,453,372 item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alley Improvements Streets and Storm Drains $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Magnolia Avenue Widening Streets and Storm Drains 700,000 600,000 4 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Overlook Street Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 50,000 50,000 6 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 150,000 7 Pavement Management Study Streets and Storm Drains 5,000 5,000 8 Sidewalk and ADA Improvements Streets and Storm Drains 400,000 400,000 9 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 150,000 10 Striping Rehabilitation Streets and Storm Drains 325,000 175,000 11 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget P 9 284,629 284,629 Total: $ 4,464,629 $ 3,914,629 Estimated FY 2020-21 Measure A Balance: $ 1,538,743 71 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015 - 2016 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April25, 2016 Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Project Type Total Cost FY 2015-16 Actuals Estimated Completion f Status 1 2015 Street Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project 7140 Streets and Storm Drains $ 3,112,852 $ 2,528,160 Jun-16 Under Construction Rehabilitation of approximately 41 lane -miles of major and local residential streets in the area west of Lincoln Avenue and south of River Road, and the area at the northeast intersection of Ontario Avenue and Magnolia Avenue; construction of an additional lane on the north side of Rincon Street between Lincoln Avenue and Alcoa Circle; replacement of damaged sidewalks, curbs, and gutters; retrofitting existing curb ramps; and installation of new curb ramps to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2 Alley Improvements 6277 Streets and Storm Drains 585,338 - On -going On -going Design and construction of various alley improvements Citywide to provide safe and smooth driving conditions. 3 Arterial Widening 7081 Streets and Storm Drains 242,378 - On -going On -going Street widening in various areas throughout the City to complete the full width of street improvements. 4 Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation 7115 Streets and Storm Drains 10,371,971 - Apr-16 Completed Construction of a grade separation (bridge) over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad tracks at Auto Center Drive to eliminate the current at grade crossing. 5 Chase Drive Improvements Phase III 8605 Streets and Storm Drains 868,599 Acquiring Right-of-way Installation of a storm drain swale system, and construction of sidewalk and bike path improvements on Chase Drive from Sonrisa Drive to Garretson Avenue. 6 Citywide Benchmark 6886 Streets and Storm Drains 130,00( On -going On -going Update of Citywide benchmarks and adjustments to North American Datum (NAD) 83. 7 Citywide GIS Master Plan 7103 Facilities, Systems and 131,884 1145 On -going On -going Acquisition of hardware and software, data conversion and applications development to expand the existing Geographic Information System, or Community Assets GIS, for citywide implementation. 8 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Facilities 7079 Streets and Storm Drains 261,757 202,072 On -going On -going Construction of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant facilities within the public right of way. 72 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015 - 2016 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: Apri125, 2016 Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Project Type Total Cost FY 2015-16 Actuals Estimated Completion Status 9 Citywide Traffic Model Update 6966 Streets and Storm Drains 150,000 On -going On -going General Plan Circulation Element update. 10 Corona Storm Drain Line 52 6291 Streets and Storm Drains 5,147,370 On -going Anticipate Construction August 2016 Construction of a 72-inch storm drain line in Joy Street from the Temescal Channel to East Grand Boulevard to East Third Street. 11 Foothill Parkway Easterly Improvements 6306 Streets and Storm Drains 999,262 28,151 On -going Anticipate Construction August 2016 Road Improvements for Foothill Parkway from 1-15/ El Cerrito to California Avenue. Construction includes installation of curb and gutter, storm drain, AC pavement, widening and medians. 12 Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension 8604 Streets and Storm Drains 45,809,985 9,137,674 Jun-17 Under Construction Design and construction of Foothill Parkway from Trudy Way to Paseo Grande, including full street improvements for a new four -lane roadway. 13 Gilbert Avenue and Sheridan Circle Street Improvement Project 7139 Streets and Storm Drains 490,000 382,873 Mar-16 Project Completed Street and drainage improvements on Gilbert Avenue and Sheridan Circle. 14 Green River Road Improvements 6197 Streets and Storm Drains 5,991,955 486,259 May-16 Under Construction Widen Green River road to four lanes between the 91 freeway and Palisades Drive. 15 Hidden Springs Drive Drainage Improvement 7142 Streets and Storm Drains 25,000 18,154 Mar-16 Project Completed Drainage improvement. 16 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation 6921 Streets and Storm Drains 1,698,429 106,139 On -going On -going Pavement rehabilitation for local streets in accordance with the current pavement management study. Rehabilitation may include reconstruction paving, crack sealing, slurry, etc. 17 Local Street Widening, Curb and Gutter Improvements 7352 Streets and Storm Drains 613,850 5,423 On -going On -going Widening of local streets and installation of curbs, gutters, driveways, sidewalks, miscellaneous curb and gutter repair and related work. 18 Magnolia Avenue Median Improvement 7141 Streets and Storm Drains 0 157,450 Mar-16 Project Completed Modification of the medians on Magnolia Avenue between El Camino Avenue and Interstate 15. 73 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015 - 2016 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 25, 2016 Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Project Type Total Cost FY 2015-16 Actua/s Estimated Completion Status 19 Magnolia Avenue Widening 6241 Streets and Storm Drains 281,823 4 On -going Design Widening of Magnolia Avenue between El Camino Avenue and All American Way, which includes widening of the bridge that crosses the Temescal Wash. 20 Maior Streets Pavement Rehabilitation 7080 Streets and Storm Drains 3,449,244 620,992 On -going On -going Pavement rehabilitation for major thoroughfares in accordance with the pavement management program. Rehabilitation may include reconstruction paving, crack sealing, slurry, etc. 21 Miscellaneous Repair and Replacement of Traffic Signals 7094 Streets and Storm Drains 116,564 59,125 On -going On -going Unscheduled repair/replacement of traffic signals and related facilities at various locations Citywide. Includes the repair or replacement of traffic signals, safety lights, street name signs, traffic control signs, signal poles, heads, etc.; rewiring old signals and damaged loops; and maintenance of the advance traffic management system. 22 Ontario Avenue Street Improvements 6969 Streets and Storm Drains 73,398 1,530 On -going Anticipate Construction January 2017 Cold in place recycling (CIR) of existing pavement along Ontario Avenue between California Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. 23 Overlook Street Improvements 6833 Streets and Storm Drains 690,879 - On -going Anticipate Construction June 2016 Pavement rehabilitation for various roads in the Overlook area over several years. 24 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing 6922 Streets and Storm Drains 587,808 243,845 On -going On -going Resurface and repair potholes and miscellaneous pavement failures with City staff and/or contracted services. 25 Pavement Management Study 7069 Streets and Storm Drains 89,738 4,183 On -going On -going Ongoing field survey of local streets to be included in the Street Saver Program for the purpose of completing the City's street inventory, and maintaining current information for rehabilitation project planning. Ann,,al Street Saver license and maintenance. 26 Public Safety Way Slurry 6965 Streets and Storm Drains - Mar-16 Complete Remove and replace failing asphalt, slurry and restripe roadway. 27 Safe Routes to School Cycle 3 6887 Streets and Storm Drains 15,877 - Ongoing On -going Construct a cross walk signal on Fullerton north of Monarch. 74 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015 - 2016 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo -Powers Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: April 25, 2016 Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Project Type Total Cost FY2015-16 Actuals Estimated Completion Status 28 Sidewalk and ADA Improvements 8027 Streets and Storm Drains 1,131,003 - On -going On -going Replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approaches; installation of missing sidewalk, curb, gutter, access ramps, bike paths, root pruning, engineering, and incidental work; and construction, replacement, or installation of ADA-compliant facilities within the public right-of-way. 29 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance 7073 Streets and Storm Drains 622,340 219,026 On -going On -going Street maintenance program for as -needed repairs or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approaches. 30 Sidewalk Improvements 15-16 6968 Streets and Storm Drains 1,097,586 - Aug-16 Under Construction Provide improvements to sidewalks, driveway approaches, pedestrian curb ramps, and cross gutters within residential neighborhoods located in the CDBG target areas. 31 Smith Street Pavement Rehabilitation 6889 Streets and Storm Drains 1,036,817 370,051 Jan-16 Project Completed Grind and overlay Smith Street between SR-91 and Rincon. 32 SR-91 City Betterments 6967 Streets and Storm Drains 200,000 - On -going On -going In conjunction with the S t-91 Capital Improvement Project, the City will fund improvements to various local streets beyond the requirements for the SR-91 Project. 33 Striping Rehabilitation 7292 Streets and Storm Drains 383,038 89,909 On -going On -going Upgrade and maintenance of Citywide striping using City staff and/or contract services; and rehabilitation and maintenance of the Citys traffic system and transportation infrastructure. 34 Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational 255,346 TOTAL_ $ 83,468,893 $ 14,917,511 75 This page left intentionally blank. 76 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 78 City of Desert Hot Springs 65-950 Pierson Blvd. • Desert Hot Springs • CA • 92240 (760) 329-6411 www.cityofdhs.org June 6, 2016 Shirley Medina Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 RE: City of Desert Hot Spring Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2014/17-2020/21 and Maintenance of Effort Dear Ms Medina, Attached is the City of Desert Hot Springs' Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2016-2021, a Project Status Report for our FY 2015/16 and the City's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 329-6411 Ext. 234 Sincerely, Joe Tanner Administrative Services Director Attachments: Measure "A" Five Year (CIP) FY 2015-2020 Project Status Report FY 2014/15 CIP Maintenance of Effort Certification Cc: Finance Department Engineering 79 FY 2015/16 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Desert Hot Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $75,147, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: MAY 31 , 2016 14147i:--- tkr- CITY MANAGE ATTEST: 80 ATTACHMENT B SAMPLE FIVE-YEAR CIP FORMAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 1 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: May 31, 2016 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $128,471 $498,000 $625,000 $1,471 $483,000 $484,471 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Maintenance $1,445,780 $123,831 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service $398,000 $200,000 3 Jefferson Street and Palm Drive Interchange with 1-10 Reimbursement $22,000 $22,000 4 Indian Avenue Construction $200,000 $100,000 5 Indirect Costs Overhead $38,640 $38,640 2016-2017 TOTALS $2,104,420 $484,471 5780 81 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 2 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: May 31, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $0 $493,000 $493,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Maintenance $500,000 $253,560 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service $400,000 $200,000 3 Indirect Costs Overhead $39,440 $39,440 2017-2018 TOTALS 939,440 493,000 82 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 3 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: May 31, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 0 $503,000 $503,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Maintenance $630,000 $262,760 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service $401,000 $200,000 3 Indirect Costs Overhead $40,240 $40,240 2018-2019 TOTALS 1,071,240 503,000 83 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: May 31, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 0 $518,000 $518,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Maintenance $750,000 $276,560 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service $402,000 $200,000 3 Indirect Costs Overhead $41,440 $41,440 2019-2020 TOTALS 518,000 84 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: May 31, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 0 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $534,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 534,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Maintenance $800,000 $291,280 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service $403,000 $200,000 3 Indirect Costs Overhead $42,720 $42,720 2020-2021 TOTALS 1,245,720 534,000 85 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: May 31, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter, and sidewalk repairs and improvements amnd signage and striping Maintenance $563 $59 on -going to be completed 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service $402 $200 on -going to be completed 3 Jefferson/I-10 and Date Palm/I-10 Interchange Reimbursement $13 $13 on -going to be completed 4 STP Slurry Project Hacienda Mission Lakes Surfacing $367 $185 on -going to be completed 5 Indirect Costs Overhead $39 $39 on -going to be completed 6 Hacienda Avenue and Verbena Drive Pedestrian Crossing Design and Construction $150 $129 Jun-16 Complete TOTALS 1,534 625 86 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF EASTVALE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 88 City of Eastvale 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite #910 • Eastvale, CA 91752 (951) 361-0900 • Fax: (951) 361-0888 • www.EastvaleCA.gov May 10, 2016 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: City of Eastvale's Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2016/17 — FY 2020/21 Dear Ms. Trevino: Please find enclosed the Fiscal Year 2016/17 — 2020/21 Measure A Expenditure Plan for the City of Eastvale. Also enclosed are the FY15116 Project Status Report and the City's MOE Certification Statement for FY16/17. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ann Hemer at ahernereinterwestgro.com or myself at jindrawan@eastvaleca.00v at (951) 703-4473. Sincerely, Joe lndrawan City Engineer Enclosures 89 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Eastvale (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $38,949, approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2015 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: % 2016 �- MICHELE NISSEN, CITY MANAGER ATTEST: MARC DONOH E; tITY CLERK 90 FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Eastvale Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 9, 2016 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $3,176,595 $1,141,000 -$603,383 $3,714,212 $1,251,000 $4,965,212 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cosy Measure A Funds 2016-2017 Remove, replace, install signs, pavement 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 233,000 $ 24,500 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 2,460,333 $ 1,956,000 Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but 3 Citywide Maintenance Program not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. $ 1,185,000 $ 1,185,000 TOTALS $ 3,878,333 $ 3,165,500 91 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Eastvale Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 9, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 1,799,712 1,276,000 3,075,712 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Remove, replace, install signs, pavement 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 1,683,333 $ 600,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. $ 510,000 $ 510,000 TOTALS $ 2,213,333 $ 1,130,000 92 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Eastvale Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 9, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 1,945,712 1,302,000 3,247,712 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total CostC Measure A Funds 2018-2019 Remove, replace, install signs, pavement 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 1,683,333 $ 600,000 Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include 3 Citywide Maintenance Program but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. $ 510,000 $ 510,000 TOTALS $ 2,213,333 $ 1,130,000 93 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Eastvale Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 9, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 2,117,712 1,341,000 3,458,712 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 Remove, replace, install signs, pavement 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 850,000 $ 600,000 Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include 3 Citywide Maintenance Program but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. $ 510,000 $ 510,000 TOTALS $ 1,380,000 $ 1,130,000 94 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Eastvale Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 9, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 2,328,712 1,381,000 3,709,712 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total CostL Measure A Funds 2020-2021 Remove, replace, install signs, pavement 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 850,000 $ 600,000 Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but 3 Citywide Maintenance Program not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. $ 510,000 $ 510,000 TOTALS $ 1,380,000 $ 1,130,000 95 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Eastvale Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 9, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic $ 722,387 $ 23,000 $ 23,000 This is an annual program. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements signal synchronization. 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. $ 5,208,736 $ 544,293 $ 544,293 This is an annual program. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control $ 1,031,658 $ 36,090 $ 36,090 This is an annual program. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. 3 Citywide Maintenance Program projects. TOTALS 6,962,781 603,383 603,383 96 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF HEMET FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 98 510 E FLORIDA AVE • HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92543 • (951)765-2360 Engineering Department May 4, 2016 Ms. Grace Alvarez Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside CA, 92501 Re: MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS REVENUE PROJECTIONS, MAINTEENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION, AND FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (FYs 2016/17 — 2020/21) Dear Ms. Alvarez, Enclosed, please find the Measure A 2015/16 status reports, FYs 2016/17 — 2020/21 Local Funds Program, and the City's MOE signed by the City Manager and attested by the City Clerk. Based on a meeting with our Finance Department (Monday, April 25, 2016), our anticipated FY 2015/16 balance is anticipated to be $4,213,787. Due to changing in staff here at the City of Hemet, some of the projects have been delayed; however, we are striving to not only get them back on track, we are progressing with projects to expend remaining monies as well as newly programmed monies. We feel as though the next 5-years for the City of Hemet will really be a well needed major maintenance overhaul, and are excited to expend our Measure A funds improving our dated roadway system. The next 5-years are computed using the above balance and have projected projects with these figures. Should you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at (951) 765-2362 or via email at slatinoRcityofhemet.orq. Sincerely, Steven Latino Engineering Director/City Engineer cc: Alexander Meyerhoff, City Manager 99 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Hemet (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $18,924, approved by the Commission at its October 12, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 111,47 1)72 2016 kV/ CITY MANAGER ATTEST: L flr\kk SECRETARY 100 Agency: City of Hemet Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Steven Latino Phone #: (951) 765-2362 Date: May 5, 2016 FY2016-17 FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status Report Expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $3,004,787.00 $1,634,000.00 $425,000.00 $4,213,787.00 $1,783,000.00 $5,996,787.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 FY 2016/17 Pavement Rehab (includes balance from Crack and Slurry Seal FY15-16) Pavement Maintenance & Improvements $3,209,000 $3,209,000 2 Pavement Management Program (Development) Software/data/Maintenance Program $100,000 $100,000 Pavement Maintenance & 3 Gilbert Street Rehab (continued from FY15-16) Improvements $574,450 $148,589 TOTALS $3,883,450 $3,457,589 101 Agency: City of Hemet Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Steven Latino Phone #: (951) 765-2362 Date: May 5, 2016 FY2017-18 FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017 - 2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017 - 2018: $2,539,198.00 $1,819,000.00 $4,358,198.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 FY 2017/18 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance & $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Maintenance) Software/data/Maintenance Program $50,000 $50,000 TOTALS $3,050,000 $3,050,000 102 Agency: City of Hemet Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Steven Latino Phone #: (951) 765-2362 Date: May 5, 2016 FY2018-19 FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017 - 2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017 - 2018: $1,308,198.00 $1,855,000.00 $3,163,198.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 FY 2018/19 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance & $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Update) Software/data/Maintenance Program $100,000 $100,000 TOTALS $3,100,000 $3,100,000 103 Agency: City of Hemet Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Steven Latino Phone #: (951) 765-2362 Date: May 5, 2016 FY2019-20 FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017 - 2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017 - 2018: $63,198.00 $1,911,000.00 $1,974,198.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 FY 2017/18 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance & $1,924,198 $1,924,198 Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Maintenance) Software/data/Maintenance Program $50,000 $50,000 TOTALS $1,974,198 $1,974,198 104 Agency: City of Hemet Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Steven Latino Phone #: (951) 765-2362 Date: May 5, 2016 FY2020-21 FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017 - 2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017 - 2018: $0.00 $1,968,000.00 $1,968,000.00 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 FY 2017/18 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance & $1,940,787 $1,940,787 Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Update) Software/data/Maintenance Program $100,000 $100,000 TOTALS $2,040,787 $2,040,787 105 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Hemet Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Steven Latino Phone #: (951) 765-2362 Date: May 5, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2016) Estimated/Actual Completion Status 1 FY 2015/16 Pavement Rehab Grind/Overlay $1,750,000 $425,000 On -going City has been utilizing funds to repave streets in conjunction with County Flood Control. Will program money left into FY2016/17 Pavement Rehab. 2 Gilbert Street Rehab Street Rehabilitation/Curb and Gutter $574,450 $0 Apr-17 Anticipate authorization to proceed for STP funds October 2016, bid and construction to follow. 3 Citywide Slurry & Crack Seal Slurry/Crackfill $1,500,000 $0 On -going Will program money into FY2016/17 Pavement Rehab, upon completion of updated PMP TOTALS $3,824,450 $425,000 106 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF INDIAN WELLS FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 108 CALIFORNIA April 15, 2016 Riverside County Transportation Commission Attn: Grace Alvarez 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 DECEIVE, APR 25 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Re: Measure "A": Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and Status Update Dear Ms. Alvarez: Attached is the City of Indian Wells Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five - Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2016/17-2020/21. Sincerely, Ken Seumalo, P.E. Public Works Director cc: Finance Director 44-950 Eldorado Drive — Indian Wells, California 92210-7497 -- V (760) 346-2489 F (760) 346-0407 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Indian Wells (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $963,640, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: Aril / 12016 c um 61 iwit-imgm CITY MANAGER ATTE : RETARY 110 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 15, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 100 273 373 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Pavement Management Street Improvement 1,060 0 2 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 373 TOTALS 1,645 373 111 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 15, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 0 278 278 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 Street Improvement 585 278 1 Citywide Parkways TOTALS 585 278 112 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 15, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 0 284 284 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type i otal cost ($000's) measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Sidewalk along south side of Fairway Drive Street Improvement 75 0 2 Pavement Management Street Improvement 155 0 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 284 TOTALS 815 284 113 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 15, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 0 293 293 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type I otal cost ($000's) measure A Funds ($000's) 2019-2020 1 Pavement Management Street Improvement 26 0 2 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 293 TOTALS 611 293 114 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: APRIL 15, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 0 302 302 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type i otai cost ($000's) measure A Funds ($000's) 2020-2021 Street Improvement 585 302 1 Citywide Parkways TOTALS 585 302 115 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: KEN SEUMALO, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: April 15, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/Actual Completion Status 4 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585 300 6/30/2016 Ongoing TOTALS 585 300 116 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF INDIO FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 118 April 12, 2016 Ms. Grace Alvarez Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 FD)EcEllvER APR 1 3 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Subject: Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan (FY16/17 — FY20/21) Dear Ms. Alvarez: Enclosed is the City of Indio's submittal of the Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 16/17 to 20/21 to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for review and approval. The City's Maintenance of Effort certification is also enclosed, as well as a status report for projects utilizing Measure A funds in Fiscal Year 2015-2016. CIf you have any questions, please call me at (760) 391-4017. l�l r/l�-, i► Sincerely, Timothy T. Wassil, PE, PMP, CCM Public Works Director cc: Juan Raya, PE City Engineer Brian Kinder, Accountant 119 p: 760.391.4000 • f: 760.391.4008 • 100 Civic Center Mall Indio, CA 92201 • www.INDIO.org FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Indio (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,048,564, approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: A Pekx t_ l 1 , 2016 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: 120 CITY OF INDIO MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FYE 6/30/16 FUND DEPT ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES 101 4411 Engineering Services 1,707,394 101 4341 Street Maintenance 2,567,529 TOTAL EXPENDITURES -UNAUDITED ESTIMATED $4,274,923 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FOR YEAR ENDING 6/30/15 APPROVED BY: $4,274,923 ROB ROCKWELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 8 FINANCE DIRECTOR Agency: City of Indio Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Juan Raya, P.E., City Engineer Phone ! 760.541 4225 Date: 0322/16 ATTACHMENT SAMPLE FIVE-YEAR CIP FORMAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure AAvallabte for FY 2016.2017 Projects: 1484 51,796 52,697 3563 51,852 52,435 item No. Project Name! Limits Project Type T Otai Cost Measure A Funds 2016.2017 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB M Storm Channel - Seismio Retrofit Design, Construction (Spring of 2017) 3047 3 2 Jackson St. Bridge Qg Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Design, Construction (Spring of 2017) 2452 3 3 Indio Blvd Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Design - Pending PW Recommendation 25150 30 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB © Storm Channel - Scour Protection Construction Pending 'Indio Blvd. NB 0 Storm Channel - Retrofit' 439 3 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Design 19000 5 6 Shields Road Connection (south of Hvry 111) Design 659 3 7 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St. - Rubidoux St) Design, Construction (Spring of 2017) 14345 192 8 Hwy 111 Median and Landscaping Design 500 20 9 North Indio Pavement Improvements Design 1828 145 10 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects On -Going 50 45 11 J444on St/Monroe St (g1-10 Fv y Interchanges Construction 8080 3 12 Madison Canal Improvements (Madison & Ave 50), Ph. 2 Construction 3219 28 la Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50 - Ave 52), Ph. 2 Design (pending IID Issues) 8950 5 14 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) On -Going 650 580 15 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program On -Going 4570 128 16 1-10 (g Jefferson Street Interchange Project Construction 85800 3 17 Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedestrian Improvements Design 2,620 10 18 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Construction 3,292 184 19 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements On -Going 50 40 20 Jefferson St & Dunbar Ct Traffic Signal Construction 311 3 21 Avenue 42 and Gore Street Traffic Signet Construction 293 3 Doctor Carson Boulevard and Oasis Street Traffic Signal 22 luloddicalmn Design 125 2 Monroe Street Signal Moct6cation and Interconnect from 23 Oteander Avenue to Comet Lane Design 461 5 24 Safe Routes to School Master Plan Design 205 5 25 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Payment 673 673 26 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 100 27 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 44 707PLS 1117,364 2,265 Agency: City of Indio Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Juan Raya, P E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-541-4225 Date: 03/22/16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: 427 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 1889 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 2,316 Item No. Project Name / Limits _ Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds ,2017-2018 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Construction 3047 3 2 Jackson St Bridge @ Storn Channel - Seismic Retrofit Design 2452 3 3 Indio Blvd Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Design 25150 30 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Construction 439 40 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash I Design 19000 5 6 !Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Construction 659 3 7 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St. - Rubidoux St.) Construction 14345 3 8 Hwy 111 Median and Landscaping Construction 500 20 9 North Indio Pavement Improvements Construction 1828 145 10 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects On -Going 50 45 11 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ I-10 Fwy Interchanges Construction 8080 3 12 Madison Canal Improvements (Madison & Ave 50), Ph. 2 Construction 3219 28 13 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50 - Ave 52), Ph. 2 Design (pending I ID Issues) 8950 60 14 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) On -Going 1000 625 15 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program On -Going 4570 128 16 1-10 @ Jefferson Street Interchange Project Construction 85800 3 17 Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedestrian Improvements Construction 2,620 10 18 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Construction 3,292 5 Doctor Carreon Boulevard and Oasis Street Traffic Signal 19 Modification Construction 125 2 Monroe Street Signal Modification and Interconnect from 20 Oleander Avenue to Comet Lane Construction 461 5 21 Safe Routes to School Master Plan Design 205 12 22 Misc Traffic Safety Improvements On -Going 50 40 23 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Payment 673 673 24 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 106 25 Indio Intemal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 45 TOTALS 187,110 2,042 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Indio Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Juan Raya, P.E., City Engineer Phone ry: 760-541-4225 Date: 03/22/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 274 1927 2,201 item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit 1 Construction 3047 3 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Design 2452 3 3 Indio Blvd. Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Construction 25150 30 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Construction 439 9 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Construction 19000 5 6 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St. - Rubidoux St.) Construction 14345 3 7 Date Street Pavement Rehabilitation (Calhoun - Cypress) Design 540 100 8 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects On -Going 50 50 9 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ 1-10 Fwy Interchanges Construction 8080 3 10 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50 - Ave 52), Ph. 2 Construction 8950 60 11 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 48 - Hwy 111) Design 2800 5 12 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) On -Going 1000 650 13 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program On -Going 4570 128 14 1-10 @ Jefferson Street Interchange Project Construction 85800 3 15 Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedestrian Improvements Construction 2,620 5 16 Clinton Street Sidewalk (South of Miles Avenue) Design 240 8 17 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Construction 3,292 3 18 Safe Routes to School Master Plan Construction 205 12 19 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements On -Going 50 40 20 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Payment 673 673 21 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 109 22 Indio Internal Services Percentaae of Salaries & Benefits 85 45 TOTALS 183,898 1,947 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Indio Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Juan Raya, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-541-4225 Date: 0322/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 254 1985 2,239 nem No. Project Name / Limits Prolect Type Totai Cosi Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB © Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Construction 3047 3 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Design 2452 3 3 Indio Blvd. Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Construction 25150 250 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB © Storm Channel - Scour Protection Construction 439 10 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Construction 19000 46 6 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St - Rubidoux St.) Construction 14345 3 7 Date Street Pavement Rehabilitation (Calhoun - Cypress) Design 607 5 8 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects On -Going 50 45 9 Jackson St./Monroe St. ©1-10 Fwy Interchanges Construction 8080 3 10 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 48 - Hwy 111) Design 2928 5 11 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) On -Going 1000 600 12 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program On -Going 4570 128 13 1-10 @ Jefferson Street Interchange Project Construction 85800 0 14 Clinton Street Sidewalk (South of Miles Avenue) Design 2,926 3 15 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Construction 3,292 0 16 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements On -Going 50 40 17 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Payment 673 673 18 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 114 19 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 45 TOTALS 175,004 1,976 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Indio Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Juan Raya, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-541-4225 Date: 03/22/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 263 2045 2,308 KUM No. Project Name / Limits Prolect Type Total Cost measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Construction 3047 3 2 Jackson St. Bridge © Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Design 2452 3 3 Indio Blvd. Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Construction 25150 250 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Construction 439 10 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Construction 19000 46 6 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St. - Rubidoux St.) Construction 14345 3 7 Date Street Pavement Rehabilitation (Calhoun - Cypress) Design 607 5 8 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects On -Going 50 45 9 Jackson St /Monroe St. ©1-10 Fwy Interchanges Construction 8080 3 10 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 48 - Hwy 111) Design 2928 5 11 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) On -Going 1000 600 12 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program On -Going 4570 128 13 1-10 @ Jefferson Street Interchange Project Construction 85800 0 14 Clinton Street Sidewalk (South of Miles Avenue) Design 2,826 3 15 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Construction 3,292 0 16 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements On -Going 50 40 17 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Payment 673 673 18 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 119 19 Indio Internal Services Percentaae of Salaries & Benefits 85 45 TOTALS 174,904 1,981 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Indio Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Juan Raya, P E., City Engineer Phone f 760-541-4225 Date: 0322/16 Item No. Project Nam► ( Limits Project Type Total Cost (3000's) Anticipated-Moasure A Funds Expended (5000's, 6/30/2016) Estimatedi Actual Completion Status 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Indio Blvd. Bridge N/B @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Design 3.047 186 06/2020 Design - 95%. Construction - Spring 2017 DinV 2.452 3 06/2019 Design - 95%. Construction - Spring 2017 Jackson St Bridge @ Storm Channel - seismic icbufit Indio Blvd Bridaes over UPRR (railroad) ppi�n - Pendlrq PW Recommendation 25,150 175 06/2020 Design pending. Construction - reviewing options Indio Blvd. Bridge S/B @ Storm Channel - scourprotection cartsDlxagn PeO061y mato mvo. Net tek Storm Channel - RehrafiC 439 3 06/2020 Design complete. Construction pending 'Indio Blvd. NB a Storm Channel - retrofit' Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash Design 19.000 5 062020 Design - 20%. Caltrans' Approval Pending Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Right -of --Way 659 5 06/2019 Under Design - Construction 2017 Hwy. 111 Improvements (RUbidoux St to Arabia St) CORSfi1Ction pending Caltrans approval 878 25 12/2017 Construction completed 15/16FY Hwy. 111 Improvements (Madison St to Rubklou% St) Design 14.345 25 12/2017 Design - 95%, Construction - spring 2017 Hwy 111 Median and Landscaping] Design 500 25 12/2019 Phased over 3 years North Indio Pavement Improvements Design 1,828 120 06/0217 Under Design. Anticipated Construction Summer 2018 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects Onfi,Wng 5o 20 On -Going Completed for 15/16FY Jackson St/Monroe St @ I-10 Fwy Interchanges DEs6gn 8.080 195 06/2020 PSR/PDS Completed and submitted to Caltrans 2/2016 for review and approval. Madison Canal Improvements (Madison & Ave 50), Phase 2 DESagR 3.219 5 06/2017 Design 90%. Construction - Fell 2016 Madison Street Improvements (Ave SO - Ave 52) Phase 2 _ DES9.1 8,95o 5 06/2019 Design 30%. Construction Fell 2018 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (see List A) On -Going 650 284 On -Going Completed for 15/16FY City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program (see List B) Design _ 4.570 350 On -Going Completed for 15/16FY I-10 at Jefferson Street Interchanae Project Construction 85 900 150 06/2018 Under Construction. anticipated Completion Spring 2016 Hwy 111 Sidewalk and Ramp Upgrade ConsInxtton 283 30 12/2017 Construction completed 15/16FY Jefferson Street Sidewalk Infill Construction 185 50 06/2016 Construction completed 15/16FY Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedeeblan Improvements Design 2,620 17 06/2018 Design - 20%. Construction - 17H8Fy Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & SyndVonoi2ation Design 3.292 10 06/2018 Design - Spring 2016 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements On -Going 50 40 On -Going Completed for 15/16FY (See Brohard re) Jefferson & Dunbar Traffic Signal City of La Qulnm (Lead Agency) 311 140 06/2017 Design Complete. Construction to begin Summer 2016 Avenue 42 and Gore Street Design to bejfn summer MI5 293 12 06/2017 Bidding 03/2016. Construction Summer 2016. Measure A Advance Debt Repayment Payment 673 673 On -Going Completed for 15/16FY Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees P1C)ect Management & Maintenance 510 100 On -Going Completed for 15/16FY Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 44 On -Going Completed for 15/16FY TOTALS 187,919 Z697 This page left intentionally blank. 128 NEM IIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 130 Brad Hancock, Mayor . Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, Council Member . Frank Johnston, Council Member. Verne Lauritzen, Council Member May 6, 2016 Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 DEC ginijE I-11\ MAY 09 2016 3 TY TRANSPORTATION OMMMISSION RE: Fiscal Year 2016/17 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement (Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan At their May 5, 2016 meeting, the Jurupa Valley City Council approved the Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and adopted the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. Enclosed for your files is the executed Fiscal Year 2016/17 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement along with the Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 332-6464. Vey truly yours, .bra L. McNay, MMC Depp y City Clerk Enclosure 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.jurupavalley.org 131 Laura Roughton, Mayor . Verne Lauritzen, Mayor Pro Tem . Brian Berkson, Council Member . Frank Johnston, Council Member . Brad Hancock, Council Member FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Jurupa Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $0, scheduled for approval by the Commission at its July, 2016 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 4 /J /6, 2016 8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.j urupavalley.org 132 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 1 of 6 Prepared By: Chase Keys Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 4/25/2016 Updated: 6/10/16 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds Budget ($000's) Measure A Funds Expended($000's) Estimated Completion Status 2015.1 Limonite Pavement Rehabilitation and Shoulder Improvement Pavement Reconstruction 454 454 445 April, 201E Complete 2015.2 Pacific Ave Pavement Rehabilitation: From 45th St. to Mission Blvd. (Coordination with RCSD Water Project). pavement Rehab 0 0 0 Delayed to FY19/20 2015.3 Golden West Sidewalk Infill Project (45th Street to Rathke Ave.) Sidewalk Infill 107 22 20 December, 2016 Design Complete; Construction Delayed to FY16/17 2015.4 Mission Blvd. Bridge (PA/ED) Co-op agreement with Riverside County 54 On -going 2015.5 Camino Real Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Reconstruction and Traffic Improvemetns 188 188 188 - Complete 2015.E Annual (FY 15116) Miscellaneous St Pavement Program pavement Rehab 1,181 946 946 April, 2016 Complete 2015.7 Annual (FY 15116) Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Traffic Improvements 30 30 30 May, 2016 Complete 2015.8 Annual (FY 15/16) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance - - 0 - Did not Complete for FY15/16 2015.9 8% Overhead/Administration Administration 147 147 125 June, 2016 Complete 2015.10 Van Buren Pavement Rehab Ph 1A; Limonite to 56th Pavement Rehab 38 38 38 December, 2016 Environmental Clearance 2015.11 Pyrite St Pavement Rehab; Jurupa to Lone Trail Co-op agreement with Riverside County Flood Control 310 310 200 March, 2016 Complete 2015.12 Limonite Widening; Etiwanda to Bain Street Widening 504 504 504 March, 2017 Going Out to Bid 2015.13 Bellegrave Ave Pavement Rehab; Wineville to Day Creek Channel Pavement Rehab 35 35 31 February, 2016 Complete TOTALS 3,048 2,674 2,527 133 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2021 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 2 of 6 Prepared By: Chase Keys Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 4/25/2016 Updated: 6/10/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 855 1,974 2,829 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016.1 Limonite Ave Widening; Etiwanda to Bain Road Widening 4,300 500 2016.2 Payback of MARA Advance 300 300 2016.3 Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehab Ph 1A; Limonite to 56th Pavement Rehab 850 450 2016.4 Golden West Sidewalk Infill Project (45th Street to Rathke Ave.) Sidewalk Infill 385 185 2016.5 Mission Blvd. Bridge (PA/ED) Co-op agreement with Riverside County 54 54 2016.E Annual Misc. Street Pavement Rehab Program Pavement Rehab 250 250 2016.7 Troth St Sidewalk Project; 58th to Jurupa Sidewalk Infill 752 250 2016.8 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 159 159 TOTALS 2,148 134 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2021 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 3 of 6 Prepared By: Chase Keys Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 4/25/2016 Updated: 6/10/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 681 2,013 2,694 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017.1 Payback of MARA Advance 867 867 2017.2 Mission Blvd. Bridge (PA/ED) Co-op agreement with Riverside County 54 54 2017.3 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab 750 750 2017.4 Annual (FY 16/17) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance 200 200 2017.5 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 150 150 TOTALS 2,021 135 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2021 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 4 of 6 Prepared By: Chase Keys Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 4/25/2016 Updated: 6/10/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 673 2,053 2,726 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018.1 Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehab Ph 2; Jurupa to Bellegrave Pavement Rehab 1,300 300 2018.2 Country Village Rd Pavement Rehab Ph 2 Pavement Rehab 600 600 2018.3 Mission Blvd. Bridge (PS&E) Co-op agreement with Riverside County 35 35 2018.4 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab 750 750 2018.5 Annual (FY 17/18) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance 200 200 2018.6 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 151 151 TOTALS 2,036 136 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2021 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 5 of 6 Prepared By: Chase Keys Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 4/25/2016 Updated: 6/10/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 690 2,115 2,805 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019.1 Pacific Ave Pavement Rehab; Limonite to Mission Pavement Rehab 600 600 2019.2 46th St Pavement Rehab; Crestmore to E/o Fort Pavement Rehab 500 250 2019.3 Mission Blvd. Bridge (Construction) Co-op agreement with Riverside County 240 240 2019.4 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab 750 750 2019.5 Annual (FY 18/19) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance 200 200 2019.6 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 163 163 TOTALS 2,203 137 JURUPA VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2021 Agency: Jurupa Valley Page 6 of 6 Prepared By: Chase Keys Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 4/25/2016 Updated: 6/10/16 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 602 2,020 2,622 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020.1 Rubidoux Blvd. Pavement Rehab; Mission to SR60 Pavement Rehab 650 450 2020.2 Valley Wy Pavement Rehab; Mission to Jurupa Pavement Rehab 400 400 2020.3 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab 750 750 2020.4 Mission Blvd. Bridge (Construction) Co-op agreement with Riverside County 240 240 2020.5 Annual (FY 19/20) Miscellaneous St Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Seal Street Maintenance 200 200 2020.6 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 163 163 TOTALS 2,203 138 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF LA QUINTA FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 140 May 5, 2016 Tay/4 4014L p r©-ROVE MAY 0 ) 2016 TRANSPORTAOCCOM COMMISSION Grace Alvarez Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Subject: City of La Quinta Fiscal Year 2016/2017 - 2020/2021 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification Dear Ms. Alvarez, The City of La Quinta respectfully submits its Measure A Capital Improvement Plan, Project Status Report and Maintenance of Effort Certification for the Commission's review and approval. The City of La Quinta is a full participant in the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Programs. Please do not hesitate to contact Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Design and Development Director/City Engineer, at (760) 777-7042 or Nick Nickerson, Project Manager, at (760) 323-5344 if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, wi'I i FRAN . SPE 7s, CEK City Enclosures 78-495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta I California 92253 i 760.777.7000 I www.La-Quinta.org 141 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of La Quinta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $937,007, approved by the Commission at its June 12, 2013 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: S . 2016 City Manager ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City al'erk 142 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, City Engineer Phone it (760) 777-4042 Date: May 3, 2016 ATTACHMENT B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $717,975 $749,500 ($1,037,221) $430,254 8752,500 $1,182,754 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program 235,000 235,000 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel) Carryover Project 2,483,000 347,715 3 Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Carry-over Project 400,000 40,240 4 New Traffic Signal (Jefferson at Dunbar) Carryover Project 430,000 47,065 5 Eisenhower Drive at Montezuma Roundabout Traffic Control 719,900 289,900 6 HSIP Intersection Improvements Traffic Control 1,260,400 126,100 TOTALS $5,528,300 $1,086,020 143 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017-2018 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, City Engineer Phone ft: (760) 777-4042 Date: May 3, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $96,734 $767,500 $864,234 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $235,000 $235,000 2 Highway 111 at La Quinta Center Drive (Dual Left Turn Lanes) Street Improvement $600,000 $600,000 TOTALS S835,000 $835,000 144 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-4042 Date: May 3, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $29,234 'Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $960,574 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $989,808 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $235,000 $235,000 2 Fred Waring Drive Reconstruction Pavement Rehabilitation $670,000 $670,000 TOTALS $905,000 $905,000 'Anticipates the City TUMF Shortfall is paid back to CVAG during this Fiscal Year. 145 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 4 of 5 Prepared by. Timothy R. Jonasson, City Engineer Phone it: (760) 777-4042 Date: May 3, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $84,808 $1,613,000 $1,697,808 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $235,000 $235,000 2 Washington Street at Washington Park Left Turn Lane Street Improvement $160,000 $160,000 3 Village Complete Streets - A Road Diet Project Street Improvement $1,250,000 $1,250,000 TOTALS $1,645,000 $1,645,000 146 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-4042 Date: May 3, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $52,808 $1,661,000 $1,713,808 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $235,000 $235,000 2 New Traffic Signal (Dune Palms Road @ Corporate Center Drive) Traffic Control $430,000 $430,000 3 Highway 111/Simon Drive Left Tum Lanes Street Improvement $650,000 $650,000 4 Wasington Street at Miles Ave Dual Left Tum Lanes Street Improvement $765,000 $382,500 TOTALS S2,080,000 S1,697,500 147 ATTACHMENT C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of La Quinta Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, City Engineer Phone #: (760) 777-4042 Date: May 3, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street/Signal Maintenance $511,909 $297,570 30Jun-16 Annual Recurring Program 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel) Street Improvement $2,483,000 $26,380 30Jun-17 PA/ED/PS&E Phase(s) 3 Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Street Rehabilitation $400,000 $359,760 31Jul-16 Under Construction 4 New Traffic Signal (Jefferson St. at Dunbar) Traffic Control $430,000 $435 30-Dec-16 Under Construction 5 Adams Street Signal and Street Improvements Street Improvement $1,116,122 $35746 12-Aug-15 Project Complete 6 Avenue 52 at Jefferson Street Roundabout Striping Modification Traffic Control $405,010 $317,330 19Jan-15 Project Complete TOTALS $5,346,041 $1,037,221 148 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 150 CITY OF• LASE LLSINOU , .M DREAM EXTREME May 2, 2016 MECMVEn MAY 09 2016 RIVERSIDECOUNTY i RANSPORTATICOMMISSION Ms. Grace Alvarez Programming & Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Subject: City of Lake Elsinore Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (FYs 2016/2017—2020/2021) Dear Ms. Alvarez: The City of Lake Elsinore has updated the Five Year Plan and the following documents are enclosed for your review: • City of Lake Elsinore Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed Certification Statement for FY 2016-2017 • Measure A Five -Year CIP plans for FYs 2016/2017 — 2020/2021 • Project Status Report for FY 2015-16 Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (951) 674-3124 x 212. Sincerely, datj Tara. Brad Fagrell City Engineer 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W W W. LAKE-E LS I NORE.ORG 151 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Lake Elsinore (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $960,771, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 2016 CITY MA L'r ER ATTES RK 152 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page: 1 OF 6 Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: May 2, 2016 2016-2017 ATTACHMENT B SAMPLE FIVE-YEAR CIP FORMAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: $ FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 930,300 1,159,000 1,203,177 886,123 1,282,000 2,168,123 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM - 1 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE $ 55,000 $ 55,000 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - 2 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 100,000 100,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 123,257 50,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 351,700 351,700 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 175,000 175,000 GUNNERSON REHABILITATION PHASE I - CITY/STATE PROJECT; CITY 6 CONTRIBUTION TO STATE ROADWAY PROJECT. REHABILITATION 12,195,210 436,423 I-15/STATE ROUTE 74 INTERCHANGE PROJECT - PA&ED PHASE OF IC 7 AND RAMP IMPROVEMENTS. CONSTRUCTION 2,400,000 300,000 MAIN STREET INTERCHANGE - PSR FOR IC IMPROVEMENTS AND 8 ROAD WIDENING. CONSTRUCTION 3,400,000 200,000 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL 9 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 19,300,167 $ 2,168,123 153 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page: 2 OF 6 Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2017-2018 1,308,000 1,308,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE $ 55,000 $ 55,000 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - 2 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 140,000 140,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 100,000 50,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 348,000 348,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 215,000 215,000 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL 6 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,358,000 $ 1,308,000 154 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page: 3 OF 6 Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 2018-2019 1,334,000 1,334,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE $ 55,000 $ 55,000 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - 2 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 190,000 190,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 50,000 50,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 452,562 324,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 215,000 215,000 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL 6 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,462,562 $ 1,334,000 155 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page: 4 OF 6 Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 2019-2020 1,374,000 1,374,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE $ 55,000 $ 55,000 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - 2 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 200,000 200,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 50,000 50,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 475,000 354,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 215,000 215,000 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL 6 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,495,000 $ 1,374,000 156 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page: 5 OF 6 Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 2020-2021 1,415,000 1,415,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE $ 90,000 $ 90,000 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - 2 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 200,000 200,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 56,000 56,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 475,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE - CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE 215,000 215,000 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL 6 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,536,000 $ 1,061,000 157 ATTACHMENT D ""SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page: 6 OF 6 Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: May 2,2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - CITYWIDE Z10000 MAINTENANCE 800,000 4,309 6/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 2 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Z10001 MAINTENANCE 300,000 38,364 6/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE - CITYWIDE Z10004 MAINTENANCE 1,055,000 87,349 6/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 4 ANNUAL PAVEMENT MANGEMENT PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE - - REMOVE PROJECT 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Z10014 MAINTENANCE 1,920,261 351,700 6/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 6 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Z10008 MAINTENANCE 5,144,728 145,157 6/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 7 AVENUE 7 SIDEWALK & STREET IMPROVEMENTS - Z10013 CONSTRUCTION 893 893 6/30/2016 PROJECT COMPLETE 8 I-15/STATE ROUTE 74 INTERCHANGE PROJECT - PA&ED PHASE OF IC AND RAMP IMPROVEMENTS. Z10015 CONSTRUCTION 1,083,000 12,079 6/30/2017 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE I-15/RAILROAD CANYON SB DECELERATION LANE - CO-OP AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS/CONSTRUCT DECEL LANE ON SB I-15 AT 9 RCR. 4432 CONSTRUCTION 1,425,000 - 12/31/2015 PROJECT IS COMPLETE FOR FY15-16 10 MAIN STREET INTERCHANGE - PSR FOR IC IMPROVEMENTS AND ROAD WIDENING.Z10017 CONSTRUCTION 950,000 58,984 10/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 11 GRAND AVE. REHABILITATION - CITY/COUNTY PROJECT; CITY CONTRIBUTION TO COUNTY ROADWAY PROJECT. Z10018 CONSTRUCTION 500,000 - 10/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 12 I-15/FRANKLIN STREET INTERCHANGE PH 2 - Z10023 CONSTRUCTION 250,000 - 6/30/2017 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 13 GUNNERSON REHABILITATION PHASE I - CITY/STATE PROJECT; CITY CONTRIBUTION TO STATE ROADWAY PROJECT. 4350 CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 - 12/31/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL ROAD 14 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) 2,500,000 495,687 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE Z10010 MAINTENANCE 550,000 8,655 6/30/2016 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE TOTALS $ 17.678.882 $ 1.203.177 158 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF MENIFEE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 160 Scott A. Mann Mayor Greg August Mayor Pro Tem Lesa Sobek Councilmember Matthew Liesemeyer Councilmember John V. Denver Councilmember 29714 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 Phone 951.672.6777 Fax 951.679.3843 www.cityofinenifee.us May 9, 2016 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Ms. Grace Alvarez Planning & Programming Manager Subject: CIP and Project Status Report Ms. Alvarez Enclosed please find the City of Menifee's Measure A Local Funds Capital Improvement Program for FY 2016/17 through 2020/21 and the project status report for FY 2015/16. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or need additional information. Thanks you, 4I- Bruce Foltz Finance Director 161 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 6, 2016 Item Numb Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Debt Service $ 20,000,000 $ 1,303,588 30 Year Bond Payment Active 2 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $ 1,450,000 $ 763,076 Yearly Road Maint. Active 3 Bradley Bridge Study $ 499,903 $ 309,759 FY 2019-2021 Preliminary Design 4 McCall Interchange Road Widening $ 189,759 $ 22,801 FY 2019-2021 Preliminary Design 5 Encanto Road Reconstruction Reconstruction $ 221,181 $ 221,181 FY 2015-16 Complete 6 County Repayment for Slurry Seal Debt Service $ 156,000 $ 156,000 FY 2015-16 Ending 2015/16 7 Newport Road Haun to Bradley Road Widening $ 204,000 $ 134,537 FY 2016-17 Preliminary Design 8 Newport Road Bradley to Murrieta Improvements $ 1,050,000 $ 50,000 FY 2016-17 Preliminary Design Total $ 23,770,843 $ 2,960,941 Page 1 of 6 162 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 6, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016-2017 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 3,994,808 $ 1,476,000 $ 2,960,941 $ 2,509,867 $ 1,599,000 $ 4,108,867 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Debt Service $ 20,000,000 $ 1,302,488 2 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $ 1,500,000 $ 475,000 3 1215/Newport Rd Interchange Road Widening $ 313,668 $ 313,668 4 Bradley Bridge Study $ 499,903 $ 190,144 5 Newport Road Bradley to Murrieta Road Widening $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 6 Newport Road Haun to Bradley Improvements $ 204,000 $ 69,463 7 Briggs Road Road Widening $ 280,000 $ 280,000 8 Holland Rd South & Haun Rd West Road Widening $ 370,000 $ 370,000 9 Goetz Road Improvements $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Total $ 24,252,571 $ 4,085,763 Balance Remaining $ 23,104 Pafgi of 6 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 6, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 23,104 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,631,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 1,654,104 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,301,088 $ 300,000 Total $ 21,600,000 $ 1,601,088 Balance Remaining $ 53,016 Page 3 of 6 164 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 6, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018-2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 53,016 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,664,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 1,717,016 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,305,488 $ 350,000 Total $ 21,750,000 $ 1,655,488 Balance Remaining $ 61,528 Page 4 of 6 165 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 6, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019-2020 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 61,528 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,714,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,775,528 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,304,088 $ 400,000 Total $ 21,800,000 $ 1,704,088 Balance Remaining $ 71,440 Page 5 of 6 166 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 6, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020-2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 71,440 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,765,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,836,440 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,302,838 $ 500,000 Total $ 21,800,000 $ 1,802,838 Balance Remaining $ 33,602 Page 6 of 6 167 This page left intentionally blank. 168 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF MORENO VALLEY FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 170 SM/GA/ED TEL: 951..413.3100 W W W. MOVAL.O RU April 27, 2016 WHERE DREAMS SOAR Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`1Floor Riverside, California 92502 14177 FREDERICK STREET P.O. Box 88005 MORENO VALLEY, CA 92552--0805 FOECENEFI) .APR 29 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Subject: City of Moreno Valley's Five -Year Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2016/17 — 2020/21 and Maintenance of Effort Certification for Fiscal Year 2016/17. Dear Ms. Medina: The City of Moreno Valley is pleased to submit its Fiscal Year (FY) 2016/17 — 2020/21 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification, approved by the City Council on April 19, 2015. An amended five-year Measure A CIP will be submitted to RCTC if changes are made by City Council to the ;listed Measure A projects as part of the upcoming FY 2016/17 CIP approval process. Please contact me if there are any questions regardttig the MeasureACM Sincerely, Linda Wilson Senior Management Analyst (951)413-3132 lindawi@moval.org Enclosures: MOE Certification Statement Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2016/17 - 2020/21 Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2016/17 Project Status Report c: File Ahmad R. Ansari, Public Works Director/City Engineer Marshall Eyerman, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer PUBLIC WOR MDEPAR MENT FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Moreno Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,459,153, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: °' , 2016 CITY CLERK Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status Report Expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $8,387,735 $3,611,000 ($6,215,000) $5,783,735 $3,889,000 $9,672,735 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 Measure A Program Budget Provide cost effective administrative functions for essential transportation projects and services: annual update of the Five -Year CIP, revisions to Standard Plans, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program Management, Pavement Management Program, preparation of grant applications, quarterly utility coordination, and project engineering and right 1 of way services for unfunded new projects. Program Budget 244 244 2 Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,180 1,180 3 Public Works - Street Maintenance Operating Budget 86 86 4 Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs 435 110 5 Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets/2005 Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,084 1,084 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,489 1,489 7 Alessandro Blvd / Elsworth St Intersection Impry Street Improvements 759 76 8 Alessandro Boulevard Entry Monument Signs Street Improvements 70 70 9 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Street Improvements 314 314 10 Bike Lane Improvements Street Improvements 142 111 11 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvements 1,050 1,050 12 Edgemont Neighborhood Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvements 320 320 13 Heacock St / Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral A to Cactus Ave Street Improvements 372 357 14 Nason Street / Cactus Avenue to Fir Avenue Street Improvements 10 10 15 Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 100 100 16 Property Acquisition for Street Purposes Street Improvements 25 25 17 Reche Vista Dr Realignment / Perris Blvd / Heacock St to NCL Street Improvements 600 300 18 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Humps) Street Improvements 75 75 19 SR-60 / Moreno Beach Dr South Side of Interchange (Phase 1) Street Improvements 35 10 20 SR-60 /Theodore Street Interchange Street Improvements 1,087 503 21 Street Improvement Program Street Improvements 3,221 620 173 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 22 Sunnymead Blvd / SR-60 EB Onramp Intersection Impry Street Improvements 309 81 23 Sunnymead Boulevard Median Modification Street Improvements 100 100 24 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Bridge Maintenance 10 10 25 Heacock Street Channel Improvements Drainage 826 121 26 San Timoteo Foothill Storm Drain K-1 and K-4 (ADP) Drainage 1,181 295 27 Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards Traffic Signals 400 15 28 Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon on Cactus Ave at Woodland Park Traffic Signals 199 199 29 Traffic Signal Equipment / Upgrades Traffic Signals 84 84 TOTALS 15,807 9,039 FUND 2301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANTS The FY 14/15 transfer of $1,495,760 from Measure A (Fund 2001) to Capital Projects Grant (Fund 2301) provided local match funding for the following grant awards. The FY 15/16 budgets and expenditures in Capital Projects Grants do not impact the Measure A fund. Any unused local match funds will be transferred back to the Measure A fund upon project completion. Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 6 a. Alessandro Blvd at Chaqall Court and at Graham Street Street Improvements Street Improvements Street Improvements Traffic Signals Traffic Signals Public Outreach 651 191 5 418 2,205 418 65 38 2 48 163 42 $613,176 - HSIPL (90%) $68,131 - Measure A (10% local match transfer) b. Aqueduct Trail $312,437 - CML (80%) $78,109 - Measure A (20% local match transfer) c. Cactus Ave EB 3rd Ln Imprv/Veterans Way to Heacock St $725,954 - MARA (65%) $390,898 - Measure A (35% local match transfer) $12,100 - Warner Ranch Deposit $1,608 - EMWD Co-op Agreement d. Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards $340,500 - CMAQ (88.45%) $44,500 - Measure A (11.56% local match transfer) e. ITS Deployment Phase 1 B $1,541,700 - CMAQ grant (85%) $490,000 - MSRC (85%) $163,300 - Measure A (13.45% local match transfer) $105,305 - DIF Traffic Signals f. Safe Routes to School Outreach Program $375,840 - HSIPL (90%) $41,760 - Measure A (10% local match transfer) Totals 174 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017-2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 633,735 3,967,000 4,600,735 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 244 244 2 Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,180 1,180 3 Public Works - Street Maintenance Operating Budget 86 86 4 Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs 200 5 5 Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets/2005 Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,084 1,084 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,489 1,489 TOTALS 4,283 4,088 175 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 512,735 4,046,000 4,558,735 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 244 244 2 Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,180 1,180 3 Public Works - Street Maintenance Operating Budget 86 86 4 Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs 200 5 5 Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets/2005 Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,084 1,084 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,489 1,489 TOTALS 4,283 4,088 176 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 470,735 4,167,000 4,637,735 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 244 244 2 Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,180 1,180 3 Public Works - Street Maintenance Operating Budget 86 86 4 Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs 200 5 5 Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets/2005 Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,084 1,084 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,489 1,489 TOTALS 4,283 4,088 177 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 549,735 4,292,000 4,841,735 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 244 244 2 Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,180 1,180 3 Public Works - Street Maintenance Operating Budget 86 86 4 Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs 200 5 5 Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets/2005 Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,084 1,084 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,489 1,489 TOTALS 4,283 4,088 178 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 2 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status Measure A Program Budget Program Budget 244 244 NA Annual Budget Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,180 1,180 NA Annual Budget Public Works - Street Maintenance Operating Budget 86 86 NA Annual Budget Public Works - Tree Trimming Operating Budget 501 501 NA Annual Budget Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs 435 110 NA Annual Budget Interest Expense Overhead Costs 11 11 NA Annual Budget Transfers to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 999 999 NA Annual Budget Transfers to 2005 Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,084 1,084 NA Annual Budget Pending Caltrans authorization for Alessandro Blvd / Elsworth Street Intersection Impry Street Improvements 789 30 Feb-17 construction Alessandro Blvd Entry Monument Signs Street Improvements 70 9 Jan-17 Design Completed Jan-15 Warranty Walk Alessandro Blvd Median / Indian Street to Perris Blvd Street Improvements 10 8 Jan-15 Jan-16 On -going Annual Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Street Improvements 240 126 NA Project On -going Annual Bike Lane Improvements Street Improvements 122 15 NA Project On -going Annual Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvements 3,416 - NA Project Cycle 1 ATP Citywide SRTS Pedestrian Facility Improvements Street Improvements 1,733 93 Jan-18 Design Completed Jan-15 Warranty Walk Delphinium Ave Sidewalk Improvements Street Improvements 5 2 Jan-15 Jan-16 Heacock St / Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral A to Cactus Ave Street Improvements 372 15 Mar-17 Design Completed Nov-15 Warranty Walk Nov- Heacock St / San Michelle Road to PVSD Lateral "A" Street Improvements 774 74 Nov-15 16 On -going Annual On -Call Property Acquisition for Street Purposes Street Improvements 25 25 NA Project On -going Annual Pavement Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Program Street Improvements 115 25 NA Project Completed Warranty Walk Aug - Perris Blvd Widening / Ironwood Ave to Manzanita Ave Street Improvements 1,514 309 Dec-15 16 Reche Vista Dr Realignment / Perris Blvd / Heacock St to NCL Street Improvements 3,736 91 Jul-16 Construction On -going Annual Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Humps) Street Improvements 50 25 NA Project Completed Oct-13 Finalizing SCE SR-60 / Moreno Beach Dr South Side of Interchange (Phase 1) Street Improvements 450 - Oct-13 Payment Completed June-12 Post -Award Reimbursement SR-60 / Nason Street Interchange Street Improvements 25 - Jun-12 Received Dec-15 Preliminary SR-60 / Theodore Street Interchange Street Improvements 1,887 440 Apr-17 Engineering On -going Annual Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street Improvements 3,261 40 NA Project Pending Caltrans authorization for Sunnymead Blvd / SR-60 EB Onramp Intersection Impry Street Improvements 359 50 Jan-17 construction On -going Annual Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Bridge Maintenance 3 3 NA Project Heacock Street Channel Improvements Drainage 1,612 352 Jan-18 Design 179 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 2 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone #: 951-413-3132 Date: April 19, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status San Timoteo Foothill Storm Drain K-1 and K-4 (ADP) Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon on Cactus Ave at Woodland Park Traffic Signal Equipment / Upgrades Drainage Traffic Enhancements Traffic Signals Traffic Signals TOTALS 1,780 438 219 114 100 38 20 110 Jul-17 Jun-17 Dec-16 NA Design Design Design On -going Annual Project 27,659 6,215 FUND 2301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANTS The FY 14/15 transfer of $1,495,760 from Measure A (Fund 2001) to Capital Projects Grant (Fund 2301) provided local match funding for the following grant awards. The FY 15/16 budgets and expenditures in Capital Projects Grants do not impact the Measure A fund. Any unused local match funds will be transferred back to the Measure A fund upon project completion. Item No. • 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project Name / Limits Project Type a. Alessandro Blvd at Chagall Court and at Graham Street $613,176 - HSIPL (90%) $68,131 - Measure A (10% local match transfer) b. Aqueduct Trail $312,437 - CML (80%) $78,109 - Measure A (20% local match transfer) c. Cactus Ave EB 3rd Ln Imgrv/Veterans Way to Heacock St $725,954 - MARA (65%) $390,898 - Measure A (35% local match transfer) $12,100 - Warner Ranch Deposit $1,608 - EMWD Co-op Agreement d. Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards $340,500 - CMAQ (88.45%) $44,500 - Measure A (11.56% local match transfer) e. ITS Deployment Phase 1 B $1,541,700 - CMAQ grant (85%) $490,000 - MSRC (85%) $163,300 - Measure A (13.45% local match transfer) $105,305 - DIF Traffic Signals f. Safe Routes to School Outreach Program $375,840 - HSIPL (90%) $41,760 - Measure A (10% local match transfer) Street Improvements Street Improvements Street Improvements Traffic Signals Traffic Signals Public Outreach Total Cost ($000's) 681 391 1,131 385 2,300 418 Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) 3 40 387 Estimated/ Actual Completion Jun-18 Aug-16 Nov-15 Jun-17 Jun-17 Sep-16 Status Design Preliminary Engineering Completed Warranty/Project Closeout 11/30/16 Pending Finance Letter and EA Design (Grants for Construction Only) Public Outreach and Education Totals 5,306 430 256,707 i 180 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF MURRIETA FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 182 1�1'til'/%/', \�. �i ,J CITY OF MURRIETA May 2, 2016 Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Subject: Measure a Local Streets and Road Revenue Projections, Maintenance of Effort Certification, and Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (FY 2016/17-2020/21) Dear Grace: Enclosed are the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement, proposed Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and Project Status Report for the City of Murrieta for your consideration and approval. Since the City Council has not adopted a formal Capital Improvement Plan budget for FY 2017-21, the enclosed Five - Year CIP is based on staff recommendation and may be subject to change upon further consideration by the City Council. We will contact you if there are any changes requested by the City Council. The Measure A balance carried over to FY 2016/17 is large due to several projects that are progressing through the right-of-way acquisition phase prior to construction and the off year for the asphalt overlay/resurfacing project. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (951) 46.1-6036 or bmoehlincamurrieta.orq at your convenience. Sincerely, Bob Moehling, P. City Engineer Attachments cc: Rick Dudley, City Manager Ivan Holler, Director of Development Services Joy Canfield, Director of Administrative Services Jeff Hitch/Public Works Construction Manager 1 Town Square • Murrieta, California 92562 phone: 951304.CITY (2489) • fayd51.698.4509 • web: murrieta.org FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Murrieta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $595,702, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: M , 2016 CI MANAGER ATTEST: G lT�j C L.,CC�1� 184 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM �..,,. Agency: City of Murrieta Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Teresa Acevedo, Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6436 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 7,168,551 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,312,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 9,480,551 Item No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing Maintenance 1,200,000 1,200,000 2 8079 Murrieta Hot Springs Widening Construction 1,500,000 1,000,000 3 8137 Resurfacing - Slurry Seal Maintenance 500 500 4 8257 Citywide Signal Mods Construction 350,000 265,000 5 8283 Traffic Striping Modifications Construction 500 500 6 8293 Sidewalk Replacement Construction 200,000 200,000 7 83031-215/Clinton Keith Rd Interchange Construction 600,000 0 8 831.1 I-151Los Alamos Rd Overcrossing Construction 500 500 9 8323 Guava Bridge/Murrieta Creek Construction 4,000,000 60,000 10 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization Construction 150,000 150,000 11 8335 Jackson Ave Bridge (at Warm Springs Creek) Construction 500 500 12 8389 Whitewood: Hunter to Clinton Keith Construction 500 500 13 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Pro Construction 500 500 14 8433 Mur Hot Springs Medians: Alta to Marg Construction 0 0 15 8448 Meadowlark Lane Improvement Construction 4,000,000 500,000 16 8456 Whitewood Extension Construction 50,000 50,000 17 10012 Jackson Ave Median Construction 500 500 18 COP 2007 for 151215 MHS interchange Debt Service 724,145 724,145 TOTALS 12,777,645 4,152,645 185 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Teresa Acevedo, Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6438 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,327,906 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,358,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017.2018 Projects: $ 7,685,906 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017.2018 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance 0 0 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 1,500,000 1,500,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 70,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 100,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 151215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 726,645 726,645 TOTALS 2,596,645 2,436,645 186 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Teresa Acevedo, Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6438 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,249,261 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,405,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 7,654,261 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt , Maintenance 1,000,000 1,000,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 0 0 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 70,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 100,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 151215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 723,239 723,239 TOTALS 2,093,239 1,933,239 187 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Teresa Acevedo, Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6438 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,721,022 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,477,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 8,198,022 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance 0 0 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 1,500,000 1,500,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 70,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 100,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 151215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 723,639 723,639 TOTALS 2,593,639 2,433,639 188 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Teresa Acevedo, Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6438 Date: May 2, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,764,383 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,551,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 8,315,383 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance 1,000,000 1,000,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 0 0 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Construction ' 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Construction 50,000 50,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Construction 70,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Construction 100,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 728,239 728,239 TOTALS 2,098,239 1,938,239 189 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY20115-201f6 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Teresa Acevedo, Accountant Phone #: 951-461-6438 Date: May 2, 2016 Item No. Project Name I limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing Maintenance $ 4,060 $ 4,008 Dec-16 Ongoing annual project 2 8079 Murrieta Hot Springs Widening Construction $ - $ - Dec-17 Design, Acquire ROW, start Con 2017 3 8137 Resurfacing - Slurry Seal Construction $ - $ - Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 4 8257 Citywide Signal Mods Construction $ 66,220 $ 42,967 Jun-16 Ongoing annual project 5 8283 Traffic Striping Modifications Construction $ 16,270 $ - Jun-16 Ongoing annual project 6 8293 Sidewalk Replacement Construction $ - $ - Jun-16 Ongoing annual project 7 8303 I-2151CIinton Keith Rd Interchange Construction $ 30,463 $ 1,776 Dec-16 Project closeout in progress 8 8311 I-151Los Alamos Rd Overcrossing Construction $ 51,205 $ - Dec-16 Project closeout in progress 9 8323 Guava Bridge/Murrieta Creek Construction $ 30,855 $ 15,145 Dec-17 Start const. in Oct 2016 10 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization Construction $ 59,494 $ 17,593 Jun-16 Ongoing annual project 11 8335 Jackson Ave Bridge (at Warm Springs Creek) Construction $ 32,016 $ 3,004 JuI-19 Construction complete/ongoing mitigation 12 8389 Whitewood: Hunter to Clinton Keith Construction $ - $ - Dec-17 Design, ROW Acq 13 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Pro Construction $ 52,396 $ 44,825 Jun-16 Ongoing annual project 14 8433 Mur Hot Springs Medians: Alta to Marg Construction $ 756,954 $ 292,153 Sep-16 Start Con March 2016 15 8448 Meadowlark Lane Improvement Construction $ 50,241 $ 13,151 May-17 Start Con December 2016 16 8456 Whitewood Extension Construction $ 2,200 $ 2,200 Dec-17 TUMF Network Addition request -pending 17 10012 Jackson Ave Median Construction $ - $ - Sep-17 Start const. in Mar 2017 19 COP 2007 for 151215 MHS Interchange Debt Service $ 725,458 $ 725,458 Jun-27 Construction complete 1 Annual Debt Service TOTALS $ 1,877,829 $ 1,162,278 190 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF NORCO FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 192 CITY of NORCO CITY MALL • 2870 CLARK AVENUE • NORCO CA 92860 • (951) 735-3900 • www.norco.ca.us • n May 23, 2016 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 RE: 2016 — 2021 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Plan Dear Ms. Trevino: The City of Norco is pleased to submit for your consideration and approval our Five - Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Program Plan projections, commencing with Fiscal Year 2016/17. We have included for your records a copy of the City of Norco approved Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program Fund, and the Annual Certification of the City's "Maintenance of Effort" document signed by City Manager, Andy Okoro. If you have any additional questions, regarding the City of Norco 2016 submittal, please contact me at 951-270-5678. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance with the City of Norco's planned expenditures for maintenance and capital improvements to our local streets and roads. Respectfully, �t Chad Blais Director of Public Works City of Norco Attachments: City of Norco Five -Year CIP Measure "A" 5-Year CIP Maintenance of Effort Letter CITY COUNCIL KEVIN SASH GREG NEWTON BERWIN HANNA Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Coinglyember ROBIN GRUNDMEYER Council Member TED HOFFMAN Council Member FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Norco (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $22,536, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 23, 2016 ";`169AANDY OKO CITY MANAGER 194 Agency: City of Norco Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: May 26, 2016 2016-2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2016 - 2017 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $3,384,829 $607,000 $1,659,451 $2,332,378 $659,000 $2,991,378 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 200,000 $ 150,000 2 River Rd - Bluff to Corydon Rehab and Overlay $ 100,000 $ 100,000 3 Golden Gate Circle Rehab and Overlay $ 25,000 $ 25,000 4 Corona Ave - First to Second Rehab and Overlay $ 300,000 $ 300,000 5 Bluff St - River Rd to Vine St Rehab and Overlay $ 25,000 $ 25,000 6 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab $ 200,000 $ 150,000 7 Hamner - 4th to 6th Rehab and Overlay $ 720,000 $ 400,000 8 Temescal - 1st to 2nd Overlay $ 210,000 $ 100,000 9 Market - Clark to Hamner Rehab and Overlay $ 40,000 $ 40,000 10 6th St - Sierra to California Cape Seal $ 150,000 $ 150,000 11 Reservoir - Corona to Temescal Rehab and Overlay $ 50,000 $ 50,000 12 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction $ 200,000 $ 150,000 13 Hamner Avenue Bridge (Planning) Reconstruction $ 83,000 $ 83,000 14 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements $ 75,000 $ 25,000 15 Street Striping Street Striping $ 35,000 $ 25,000 16 Miscellaneous Seal Coats Slurry Seal $ 75,000 $ 25,000 17 Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Maintenance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 TOTALS $ 2,513,000 $ 1,823,000 195 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Norco Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: May 26, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 2017-2018 $1,168,378 $672,000 $1,840,378 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $200,000 $150,000 2 Rocky View Overlay $50,000 $50,000 3 Hillside Ave - Second to Third Reconstruction $20,000 $20,000 4 Chestnut - Bluff to Corydon Rehab and Overlay $270,000 $200,000 5 Norconian - 5th to Norco Dr Rehab and Overlay $160,000 $160,000 6 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay $200,000 $150,000 7 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction $200,000 $150,000 8 Hamner Avenue Bridge (Planning) Reconstruction $83,000 $83,000 9 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvments $25,000 $25,000 10 Street Striping Striping $35,000 $25,000 11 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal $75,000 $25,000 12 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance $25,000 $25,000 TOTALS $1,343,000 $1,063,000 196 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Norco Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: May 26, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 2018-2019 $777,378 $685,000 $1,462,378 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost 1 Measure A Funds 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 150,000 $ 150,000 2 Hillside Ave - Second to Third Rehab and Overlay $ 50,000 $ 50,000 3 First Dt - Temescal to Hillside Rehab and Overlay $ 160,000 $ 100,000 4 Hamner Ave Bridge (Planning) Reconstruction $ 83,000 $ 83,000 5 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay $ 200,000 $ 150,000 6 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction $ 200,000 $ 150,000 7 TUMF Project Match - Hidden Valley Reconstruction $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements $ 25,000 $ 25,000 9 Street Striping Striping $ 35,000 $ 25,000 10 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal $ 75,000 $ 25,000 11 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 TOTALS $ 1,028,000 $ 808,000 197 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Norco Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: May 26, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 654,378 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 706,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,360,378 2019-2020 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 110,000 $ 100,000 2 Hillside Ave - Second to Third Rehab and Overlay $ 50,000 $ 50,000 3 Western - 2nd to Parkridge Rehab and Overlay $ 160,000 $ 100,000 4 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay $ 150,000 $ 150,000 5 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction $ 150,000 $ 150,000 6 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements $ 25,000 $ 25,000 7 Street Striping Striping $ 35,000 $ 25,000 8 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal $ 25,000 $ 25,000 9 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 TOTALS $ 730,000 $ 650,000 198 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Norco Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: May 26, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 710,378 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 727,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,437,378 2020-2021 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 110,000 $ 100,000 2 River Dr - Sierra to Pedley Rehab and Overlay $ 530,000 $ 300,000 3 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay $ 150,000 $ 150,000 4 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction $ 150,000 $ 150,000 5 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements $ 25,000 $ 25,000 6 Street Striping Striping $ 35,000 $ 25,000 7 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 TOTALS $ 1,050,000 $ 800,000 199 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Norco Page of 1/1 Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: May 26, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 200,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 2 Hillside - Sixth St to River Dr. Overlay 331,000 185 Completed 3 ValleyView - First St to Second St Rehab and Overlay 136,500 136 Completed 4 Hilltop Lane Rehab and Overlay 64,000 64 Completed 5 Sierra - Fifth St to Sixth St Rehab and Overlay 271,000 239 Completed 6 Haileah Circle Rehab and Overlay 38,000 38 Completed 7 Lookout Pt Rehab and Overlay 35,000 35 Completed 8 Fourth St - Temescal Ave to Hillside Ave Rehab and Overlay 65,000 65 Completed 9 Hamner Ave - Detroit St to Hamner Bridge Rehab and Overlay 63,000 63 Completed 10 Third Street - Valley View to Corona Ave Rehab and Overlay 1,288,000 408 Completed 11 Unspecified Rehabilitation & Overlay Rehab and Overlay 200,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 12 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 200,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 13 Hamner Ave Bridge (Planning) Reconstruction 83,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 14 Norco Dr. - Fifth St to Rocky View Dr Reconstruction 875,246 426 Completed 15 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvement: 300,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 16 Street Striping Striping 35,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 17 Miscellaneous Seal Coats Slurry Seal 25,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 18 Hamner Ave Slurry Seal 67,650 0 Dec-16 Moved to FY16/17 19 Sixth St - Sierra Ave to California Slurry Seal 94,300 0 Dec-16 Moved to FY16/17 20 Unspecified Slurry Seal Slurry Seal 75,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 21 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance 30,000 0 Jun-17 Moved to FY16/17 TOTALS: 4,476,696 1,659 200 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PALM DESERT FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 202 CITY Of PHA o[s[RT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346-0611 info@cityofpalmtlescrt.org May 6, 2016 Shirley Medina Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, Califomia 92502-2208 Subject: Measure A Capital Improvement Program Dear Shirley, Enclosed for Commission consideration is the City of Palm Desert's proposed 2016/2017 — 2020/2021 Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program, as well as the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement and calculation documentation. The Five -Year Program will be reviewed in the near future by our City Council. If the City Council makes any changes to the program, a revised version will be submitted to you for approval. If no changes are made, please treat this as the official submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 346-0611, extension 469. Sincer y, Mark re wood, Director o Public Wor Enclosu cc: Justin McCarthy, Interim City Manager Janet M. Moore, Director of Finance J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance t, ra.rue.nnaieem 203 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Desert (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,398,146, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: ---5s % b 2016 204 ATTACHMENT B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: Date: May 6, 2016 FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $14,779,998 $2,686,000 $1,352,886 $16,113,112 $2,729,000 $18,842,112 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Right Turn Lane - Fred Waring Drive to Hwy 111 Street Project 775,000 558,069 2016-2017 Estimated carryover FY15/16 $558,069 Portola Interchange at 1-10 Estimated Carryover FY15/16 $15,110,661 On-ramp/off-ramp construction 71,993,000 110,661 Cook Street Widening FY16/17 request $3,655,500 Street Project 9,665,500 3,655,500 Street Resurfacing Estimated Carryover FY15/16 $2,195,270 Maintenance Project 5,445,270 4,095,270 FY16/17 request $1,900,000 Traffic Signals - Accessible Pedestrian Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 FY16/17 request $50,000 Citywide Street Striping Estimated carryover $299,820 Maintenance Project 599,820 599,820 FY16/17 request $300,000 Jefferson Street Interchange Estimated Carryover FY15/16 $211,697 on-ramp/off-ramp construction 312,500 211,697 Gerald Ford East of Cook Improvements Estimated carryover FY15/16 $265,000 Roadway Improvements 265,000 265,000 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Estimated carryover FY 15/16 $134,457 Maintenance Project 266,621 184,457 FY16/17 request $50,000 Bridge Inspection Program Estimated carryover FY15/16 $100,000 Maintenance Project 200,000 200,000 FY16/17 request $100,000 LED Indication Replacement Program Estimated Carryover FY15/16 $100,000 Maintenance Project 150,000 150,000 FY16/17 request $50,000 IISNS Upgrades Program Estimated Carryover FY15/16 $150,000 Maintenance Project 225,000 200,000 FY16/17 request $50,000 Interconnect System Improvement Project Maintenance Project 293,000 293,000 FY16/17 $293,000 Controller Cabinet Assembly Upgrades Estimated Carryover FY15/16 $13,397 Maintenance Project 125,397 125,397 FY16/17 request $112,000 Bike and Golf Cart Lane Improvements FY16/17 $85,000 Street Project 85,000 85,000 TOTALS 90,451,108 10,783, 871 205 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 6, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 8,058,241 2,784,000 10,842,241 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Cook Street Widening Street Project 9,665,500 3,000,000 2017-2018 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project 3,100,000 1,900,000 Traffic Signals -Accessible Pedestrian Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 Citywide Street Striping Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 San Pablo Right Turn lane at Fred Waring (southeast corner) Street Project 1,765,000 1,765,000 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 LED Indication Replacement Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 IISNS Upgrades Program Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 Controller Cabinet Assembly Maintenance Project 112,000 112,000 Upgrades Program San Pablo Ave Street Improvements from Fred Waring Drive to Magnesia Street Project 1,400,000 1,400,000 Falls Drive TOTALS 8,777,000 206 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 6, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 2,065,241 2,840,000 4,905,241 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Cook Street Widening Street Project 9,665,500 2,400,000 2018-2019 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project 3,100,000 1,900,000 Traffic Signals -Accessible Pedestrian Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 Citywide Street Striping Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 LED Indication Replacement Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 IISNS Upgrades Program Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 TOTALS 4,900,000 207 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 6, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 5,241 2,925,000 2,930,241 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project 3,100,000 1,900,000 2019-2020 Traffic Signals -Accessible Pedestrian Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 Citywide Street Striping Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 TOTALS 2,400,000 208 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 6, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 530,241 3,013,000 3,543,241 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project 3,100,000 1,900,000 2020-2021 Traffic Signals -Accessible Pedestrian Program Maintenance Project 50,000 50,000 Citywide Street Striping Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 75,000 50,000 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 TOTALS 2,400,000 209 ATTACHMENT D **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Palm Desert Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 6, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status Monterey Avenue / 1-10 Interchange Improvements On-ramp/off-ramp construction 12,699 30 April 2016 Completed Right Turn Lane - Fred Waring Drive to Hwy 111 Street Project 775 0 Sept 2016 Construction June 2016 Right Turn Lane -Hwy 111 to Fred Waring (n/w corner) & Sidewalk Infill Street Project 495 85 Oct 2015 Completed Portola Interchange at 1-10 On-ramp/off-ramp construction 71 993 0 2025 In preliminary environmental phase Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project 4,900 751 Jan 2016 Current FY Complete Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Drive to Country Club Street Project 6,500 0 Abandoned Drive Portola Free Right at Fred Waring Street Project 1,850 0 Oct 2015 Completed Traffic Signals - Accessible Construction to begin Pedestrian Program Maintenance Project 50 0 Oct 2015 July 2016 Citywide Street Striping Maintenance Project 303 0 May 2016 Current FY Complete Jefferson Street Interchange on-ramp/off-ramp construction 313 24 2017 Under Construction San Pablo Right Turn lane at Fred Waring (southeast corner) Street Project 365 358 On Hold Gerald Ford East of Cook Improvements Roadway Improvements 265 0 In design San Pablo Ave Street Improvements from Fred Waring Street Project 1,400 0 Scoping ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance Project 200 2 May 2016 Current FY Complete Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100 4 Oct 2015 Current FY Complete LED Indication Replacement Program Maintenance Project 100 0 July 2016 Construction June 2016 IISNS Upgrades Program Maintenance Project 150 0 Oct 2016 Construction August 2016 Controller Cabinet Assembly Maintenance Project 336 99 June 2016 Current FY Complete Upgrades Program TOTALS 102,794 1,353 210 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 212 City of Palm Springs Department of Public Works and Engineering 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, CA 92262 Tel: (760) 323-8253 • Fax: (760) 322-8360 • Web: www.palmspringsca.gov April 25, 2016 Ms. Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-22083 Attention: Grace Alvarez pECEIIVE MAY 04 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Re: Measure "A" Local Street & Road Program City of Palm Springs Annual Five -Year Measure "A" CIP (Fiscal Year 2016/17 - 2020/21) Dear Ms. Trevino: Enclosed, at RCTC's request, is the City of Palm Springs' Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement, Project Status Report for CIP Projects in FY 2015/16, proposed Local Measure "A" Five -Year CIP Plan for fiscal year 2016/2017 through 2020/2021. The City participates in the MSHCP and TUMF programs as required to participate in the Measure "A" Program. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 322-8253, ext. 8380 or Savat Khamphou at (760) 323-8253 ext. 8744. Sincerely, Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, PE, PLS Assistant City Manager / City Engineer Enclosures c: David H. Ready, City Manager Geoffrey Kiehl, Director of Finance/Treasurer Nancy Klukan, Asst. Director of Finance Post Office Box 2743 • Palmrings, California 92263-2743 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,498,732, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: O.41 LO , 2016 SECRETARY CITY MANAGER ATTEST: 214 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT - CIP Projects FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Savat Khamphou Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext. 8744 Date: April 25, 2016 (Revised on 5/17/2016, math error) Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) 15/16 FY Measure A Funds (Expended) Estimated Completion Status June 2016 Annually Dec 2018 Dec 2017 Annually April 2015 June 2038 Completed June 2016 June 2019 June 2016 December 2016 Dec 2020 June 2016 June 2015 Dec 2019 Dec 2017 Dec 2016 June 2016 June 2021 Dec 2017 In Construction Repairs being performed this year as needed. In Right of Way Acquisition Phase. 95% Plans and Acquiring Right of Way. As Needed. Construction Complete in April 2015. On -Going Contract Until Year 2038 As needed. All repairs up to date. Notice to Proceed with Construction issued 4/14/2015. Project in Final Design/RFA for R/W Submitted. Notice to Proceed with Construction 4/16/2015. Contract being Awarded All Environmental Studies Completed. Begin CEQA Circulation. Final Billing from CVAG Received. Continuos. As needed. Proceeding with Environmental Studies. Environmental Studies On -Going. Project In Construction. Project In Construction. Continuing Payment of Bonds. Last Payment June 2021. In PA&ED Phase 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 3,590,000 $ 2,700,000 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 200,000 50196 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave.) Roadway and Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 65,000 50221 South Palm Canyon @ Arenas Wash (LWC) New Bridge New Bridge $ 4,875,000 $ - 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 40,000 $ 60 50225 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction Road Maintenance $ 1,026,000 $ 400,000 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 50244 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation $ 5,024,000 $ 250,000 50245 Ramon Road Widening @ Whitewater River (Incl. Bridge) Bridge/Roadway Widening $ 32,000,000 $ 58,000 50272 Traffic MGMT Center/Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect Traffic Signal Improvements $ 2,650,000 $ 600,000 50290 Agua Caliente Museum Roadway on Hermosa Drive Roadway Improvements $ 1,300,000 $ 2,000 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 41,000 50307 Date Palm Drive / 1-10 Interchange Widening Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 16,800,000 $ 13,532 50312 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 4,200 50316 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 20,000 50317 South Palm Canyon Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 20,000 50321 Jefferson Street / 1-10 Interchange (Proportionate Share) Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 435,733 $ 50,000 50322 Ramon Road Pvmt Rehab: Sunrise to Compadre/EI Cielo Road Maintenance $ 750,000 $ 365,000 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment Road Maintenance $ 6,800,000 $ 129,000 50329 Gene Autry Trail Second Left Turn Lane@Vista Chino (Hwy 1 Traffic Improvements $ 500,000 $ 15,000 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian) Street Improvements $ 4,000,000 $ 50,000 June 2020 Project in Preliminary Engineering Phase 59416 Sunrise Way at Ralph's Shopping Center _ Traffic Signal Installation $ 300,000 $ 260,000 June 2015 Project Completed. 60076 Farrell Drive / Vista Chino Traffic Improvements $ 450,000 $ 35,000 Dec 2015 Construction Completed. Project Close -Out. TOTALS $ 208,439,155 $ 5,338,214 215 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Savat Khamphou Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8744 Date: May 24, 2016 (Revised) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 10,725,143 Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,054,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 12,779,143 ACCT WS Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2016-2017 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 500,000 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50196 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave including UPRR Bridge Widening) Roadway and Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 120,000 50221 South Palm Canyon Bridge @ Arenas Wash (LWC) New Bridge New Bridge $ 4,875,000 $ 100,000 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50225 Annual Overlay & Reconstruction Road Maintenance $ 920,000 $ 920,000 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 50244 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation $ 5,000,000 $ 300,000 50245 Ramon Road Widening @ Whitewater River (Incl. Bridge) Bridge/Roadway Widening $ 32,000,000 $ 60,000 50272 Traffic MGMT Center/Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect Traffic Signal Improvements $ 2,100,000 $ 200,000 50290 Agua Caliente Museum Roadway on Hermosa Drive Roadway Improvements $ 1,300,000 $ 300,000 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 150,000 50307 Date Palm Drive / 1-10 Interchange Widening Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 16,800,000 $ 7,000 50312 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50316 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 100,000 50317 South Palm Canyon Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 100,000 50321 Jefferson Street / 1-10 Interchange (Proportionate Share to CVAG) Expanded Freeway Interchange $ 435,733 $ 300,000 50322 Ramon Road Pvmt Rehab. from Sunrise to Compadre Road Maintenance $ 447,000 $ 100,000 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment Road Maintenance $ 6,800,000 $ 1,100,000 50329 Gene Autry Trail Second Left Turn Lane@Vista Chino (Hwy 111) Traffic Improvements $ 500,000 $ 200,000 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian) Street Improvements $ 4,000,000 $ 900,000 TBD Sand -Wall Gene Autry Trail and UPRR Road Maintenance $ 700,000 $ 100,000 60076 Farrell Drive / Vista Chino Traffic Improvements $ 450,000 $ 50,000 TOTALS $ 205,876,155 $ 5,967,422 Balance $ 6,811,721 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Savat Khamphou Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8744 Date: May 24, 2016 (Revised) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 6,811,721 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,095,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 8,906,721 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2017-2018 Road Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 500,000 50100 Annual Slurry Seal 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50196 Indian Canyon Drive UPRR Bridge Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave Including UPRR Bridge Widening) Roadway &Bridge Widening $ 21,250,000 $ 510,000 50221 South Palm Canyon Bridge @ Arenas Wash New Bridge $6,165,000 $ 400,000 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 40,000 $ 40,000 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 50245 Ramon Road Widening @ Whitewater River (Incl. Bridge) Bridge/Roadway Widening $ 32,000,000 $ 50,000 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 300,000 50312 50316 Pavement Condition Survey East Palm Canyon @ Palm Cyn Wash Road Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 100,000 50317 South Palm Canyon Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 100,000 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment Road Maintenance $ 6,800,000 $ 1,100,000 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian) Street Improvements $4,000,000 $ 500,000 TBD TBD Sand -Wall Gene Autry Trail and UPRR Road Maintenance $ 700,000 $ 100,000 North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dillon (MOU with DHS) Street Improvements $ 600,000 $ 200,000 TOTALS $ 179,753,422 $ 4,160,422 Balance $ 4,746,299 217 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Savat Khamphou Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8744 Date: May 24, 2016 (Revised) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 4,746,299 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,137,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 6,883,299 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2018-2019 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 500,000 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 40,000 $ 40,000 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 50245 Ramon Road Widening @ Whitewater River (Incl. Bridge) Bridge/Roadway Widening $ 32,000,000 $ 375,000 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 80,000 50312 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50316 East Palm Canyon @ Palm Cyn Wash South Palm Canyon @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Rehabilitation $ 5,973,000 $ 100,000 50317 Bridge Replacement $ 6,165,000 $ 100,000 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment Road Maintenance $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian) Street Improvements $4,000,000 $ 1,000,000 TBD Sand -Wall Gene Autry Trail and UPRR Road Maintenance $ 700,000 $ 100,000 TBD North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dillon (MOU with DHS) Street Improvements $ 600,000 $ 200,000 TBD Sonora (East of Sonora Court) Street Improvements $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTALS $ 146,738,422 $ 3,955,422 Balance $ 2,927,877 218 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Savat Khamphou Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8744 Date: May 24, 2016 (Revised) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 2,927,877 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,201,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 5,128,877 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2019-2020 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 500,000 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 40,000 $ 40,000 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 50245 Ramon Road Widening @ Whitewater River (Incl. Bridge) Bridge/Roadway Widening $ 32,000,000 $ 375,000 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 400,000 50312 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment Road Maintenance $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian) Street Improvements $4,000,000 $ 500,000 TBD North Indian Avenue - 20th to Dillon (MOU with DHS) Street Improvements $ 600,000 $ 200,000 TOTALS $ 133,800,422 $ 3,375,422 Balance $ 1,753,455 219 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Palm Springs Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Savat Khamphou Phone #: (760) 323-8253 ext.8744 Date: May 24, 2016 (Revised) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,753,455 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,267,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 4,020,455 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (All Funding Sources) Measure A Funds (To Expend in FY) 2020-2021 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 500,000 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements $ 40,000 $ 40,000 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $ 10,422 $ 10,422 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge $ 95,000,000 $ 900,000 50312 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment Road Maintenance $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 TOTALS $ 1,000,422 $ 2,800,422 Balance $ 1,220,033 220 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF PERRIS FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 222 CITY OF PERRIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 101 North `D' Street, Perris, CA 92570-2200 TEL: 951-943-4610 FAX: 951-943-5065 May 9, 2016 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County of Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Grace Alvarez Re: FY 2016-2021 Measure "A" Improvement Plan Enclosed, please find City of Perris proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed, please find an exhibit depicting the status of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE prepared by the Finance Department and signed by the City Manager. As noted on the Project Status Report for Fiscal Year 15,16, Measure A funding was utilized for Goetz Road Improvements and Placentia Ave/I-215 Extension Projects. These projects were previously not included in our plan; therefore, we respectfully request the Commission to approve this project when adopting our next 5-Year Plan. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Habib Motlagh City Engineer Cc: Rory Carr, Assistant City Manager Jennifer Erwin, ,Assistant Finance Director 223 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for the City of Perris that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission {"Measure A"} shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,218,470, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the City of Perris shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the City of Perris for local transportation purposes. The City of Perris hereby acknowledges that the fa:lure of the City of Perris to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the City of Perris commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as 4prov..;d by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated. _ _ _-- 010 Richard Beimudez, CityManager ATTEST: on Carr, Ass•stant City Manager 224 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/9/2016 Item No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Project Name / Limits Pavement Rehabilitation & Slurry Murrieta Road & Bridge Improvements Goetz Road Improvements"' Annual Pothole Repairs 4th Street improvements Perris Blvd Improvements (4th St to 1-215) Nuevo Interchange @ 1-215 1-215 Widening Placentia/1-215 Interchange — ATTACHMENT D **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY2015-2016 Project Type Pavement Rehab Widening Widening & Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance Pavement Rehab Widening & Pavement Rehab Widening & Pavement Rehab Project Oversight Widening & Pavement Rehab Total Cost (5000's) 1,200 1,800 1,000 100 1,000 1,000 500 250 500 Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/3012016) 431 0 100 98 0 136 0 45 74 Estimated/ Actual Completion This Phase is completed Project near Completion Status Under Construction Design Underway On -Going Construction Underway/ Gas Tax funding currently being used Finalizing Design Project Underway/ Other Funding Sources being utilized Preliminary Engineering TOTALS 7,350 884 "City used Measure A funding for projects 3 and 9 indicated above for FY 14/15. These projects were not on last year's 5-year plan review. ATTACHMENT B SAMPLE FIVE-YEAR CIP FORMAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Perris Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #; (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/9/2016 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 3,758,636 $ 1,416,000 $ 884,000 $ 4,290,636 $ 1,532,000 $ 5,822,636 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 Perris Blvd Widening (1-215 Bridge to 4th St) Widening, Right -of -Way 4,500 500 2 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 2,000 1,500 3 Goetz Road Improvements Widening & Pavement 2,500 500 Rehab 4 Nuevo Road Bridge New Bridge & 5,000 1,000 Pavement 5 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 100 100 6 Murrieta Road & Bridge Widening 500 450 Improvements TOTALS 14,600 4,050 226 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Perris Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/9/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,772,636 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,563,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 3,335,636 Item No. Project Name 1 Limits Project Tux Total Cost Measure A Funds 20'17-2018 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,5fl0 9fl0 2 Nuevo Road Widening & 2,000 500 (Redlands Ave to Murrieta Rd) Pavement Rehab 3 Ramona Exwy Pavement Rehab 1,000 1,000 (City Limits) 4 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 50 50 5 Placentia Ave Widening & Widening & 2500 500 Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab TOTALS 7,050 2,950 227 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Perris Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/9/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 385,636 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,594,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 1,979,636 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 300 2 Perris Blvd (City Limits) Widening & Pavement 1,200 1,000 Rehab 3 Annual Pothole Pavement Maintenance 50 50 TOTALS 2,750 1,350 228 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Perris Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/9/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 629,636 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,642,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 2,271,636 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance 1,500 1,000 2 Downtown Streets Pavement Maintenance 1,500 500 3 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 50 50 TOTALS 3,050 1,550 229 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Perris Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951 ) 943-6504 Date: 5/9/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 721,636 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,691,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 2,412,636 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Annual Slurry Seat &Overlay Pavement Maintenance 2,000 1,500 2 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 50 50 TOTALS 2,050 1,550 230 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 232 cri r OF- aancHo mir<,-Ice May 20, 2016 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: FY 2017-2021 Measure "A" Local Street and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (Revised) 5/20/16) Dear Ms. Trevino: Attached are the Local Streets and Roads Program for Measure "A" Funds for FY 2017- 2021, project status report for prior year Plan (FY 2015/2016) and the FY 2016/2017 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. The City's maintenance of effort for FY 2016/2017 is $1,405,905, which exceeds our established maintenance of effort requirement of $674,811. The City's five-year Capital Improvement Program totals $41,700,000 and identifies Measure "A" local funds for the five-year plan totaling $6,800,000. The Measure A Fund Balance is projected to be $573,015 as a result of the 5-year Program. The City currently carries a balance of approximately $2,712,015 in the Measure "A" Local Fund account. Therefore, with current and projected future allocations, adequate funds appear to be available for the plan. Attached is the City's status report for our prior year Plan FYE June 30, 2016. Please feel free to call me at (760) 770-3224 should you have any questions. Sincerely, G �v Mark W. Sambito Director of Public Works Enclosures: Measure "A" FY 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan Project Status Report FY 2015/2016 FY 2016/2017 MOE Certification Statement ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE 1-FOUSING AUTFFORITY PUBLIC LIBRARY PUBLIC WORKS Tel. (760) 324-4511 Tel. (760) 328-2266 Tel. (760) 770-3207 Tel. (760) 770-3210 Tel. (760) 341-7323 Tel. (760) 770-3224 Fax. (760) 324-8830 Fax. (760) 324-9851 Fax. (760) 324-0528 Fax. (760) 770-3261 Fax. (760) 341-5213 Fax. (760) 770-3261 69-825 I-FIGF+WAY 11-yalyNCRO MIRAGE, CA 92270 www.ci.ratet-mirage.ca.us FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Rancho Mirage (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $674,811, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits f to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: , 2016 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: 234 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 20, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $2,712,015 $890,000 $3,602,015 Itep Total Cost Measure A N {, Project Name / Limits Project Type ($000's) Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays, Pavement Rehab. and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance/ Overlay 2,000 2,000 2 Monterey Avenue Street Improvements -Gerald Ford to Dinah Shore (R/W, Const.) Widening/Reconstruction 1,200 350 3 Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Channel (PS&E) Replace Low Water Xing 2,100 60 4 Traffic Signal Coordination Grant Design and Construction Traffic Signal Coordination 2,000 230 TOTALS 7,300 2,640 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 20, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $962,015 $908,000 $1,870,015 Item Na^'w Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) v+ 2017-2018 • Preventative Maintenance/ Overlay Replace Low Water Xing 1,200 30,000 700 460 1 2 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays, Pavement Rehab. And striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver. Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Channel (PSE/Const.) TOTALS 31,200 1,160 ooa` i, SlY101 0006 (MOOS) spun -I H aansealnl ST019£91T$ 000'9Z6$ 960'062$ 0006 (s.00o$) ;sort IMOI Aelaan0 /aoueuewpAi ani}e}uanaad ad�(1;oafoad Jenedaom r(q pauiluepi siewis owind snopen uo 6uidu}s pue tgeyaj luawaned 'si(epeito 0y leas >pen yeas )(Anis apinnIrtii0 :sloafoad 61.0Z-81,0Z Ad ao} algelleny y aanseaw pa;ewas3 :uogeoolly y aanseaw 6603-81.OZ Ad PoleuiRs3 :aouele8 y aanseew aeaA aopd pa;ewns3 SMLUrI / aweN 130f0ad tZ0Z - LtOZAd WV8002:Jd SONnd 7V007 V 3WISt13W NO/SSIMV00 NOLLVI IOdSNV2:11 A( NnOO 3OISH3A121 6 6 1.0Z-810Z 91-0Z `OZ AeW :ales 17ZZ£-OLL (09L) :# auoyd sou3 wernim :l(q paaedaad 9 Jo g °Bed a6eJmi oyouea :AouaBd 000` b 000` 6 S1V101 Jenedwoiw RI pepuepi slealls °Kind snouen uo 6u!cluls pue •geyaj }uawaned `sAeueno 0y 'leas )1oeio gees [um's apin fqn 6 000' 1. 000` 6 Ael-an0 /aoueueluieW emquenaid OZOZ-660Z oo (s.000$) soun4 tH °inseam! (s.000$) lso7 Imo I adl(1 loafoJd sMuln / aweN Peroad NIN wail ST0'0651$ 000`VS6$ S 1.0`9E9$ :sPafold OZOZ-660Z Ad.1oj. aigeliend d annseaw pa;ewi}s3 :uogeoolly d aanseaw OZOZ-660Z Ad palm!1s3 :aoueiee y ainseaw aeaA aopd pa;ewgs3 bZOZ - Z kOZ Ad Wb210021d SONnd 7V007 V MOSV31,11 NOISSIWW00 N011b'12 OdSNVall A1N O 3OISH3Ald 960Z 'OE AeW :WO VZZ£-OLL (09L) :it auoyd sou3 wellllM :Aq pandald 910 b a6ed e6em oyoueld :AoueBy 000' 4 00e 4 S7V101 '19ne1:10.10lw Aq pepuepl siaai}s ollgnd snouen uo 6uldpTs pue sAepeno O`d 'leas >pen 'leas timis apl AT!O 4 000 4 OOZE AePanp /aoueua}ulel\l and}e}uanald 4Z0Z-OZOZ rn (s.000$) spun-1 H °inseaW (s.000$) lson mot ad�(1 loafoud swirl / aweN pafold �N wail SZO`£LS`T$ 000`£86$ 9 40'069$ :spafoud 4Z0Z-OZOZ Ad Jo} amelieny b amsealN pa4augs3 :uoge3011b y aansealN 4Z0Z-OZOZ Ad Pa}eums3 :a3uele8 y °inseaw JeaA Jopd pa;ewns3 tZOZ-LtOZAd wb2lJOdd SONI]d 7V007 if3WISb'3W NOISSIW/NO0 NOIIV_ JOdSNVW1 A1NI100 3OISH3Ald 960Z `OZ /few :area PZZE-OLL (09L) 4 auoyd soup welllm :Aq pandald 9 }o g °Bed 96e.m ogoue d :A3ue6d RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: Rancho Mirage Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 20, 2016 Item Total Cost Measure A Estimated No. Project Name / Limits Project Type ($000's) Funds ($000's) Completion Status 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance 1,000 0 Oct - 16 Ongoing - Fall Construction Ongoing - Awaiting r/w & utility clearance - Construction fall 2 Monterey Avenue Street Imps. - Gerald Ford to Dinah Shore (R/W, Const.) Widening/Reconstruction 1,200 117 Dec - 16 2016 N O Ongoing - RFA for PS&E 3 Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Channel (PS&E) Replace Low Water Xing 1,500 17 submitted, waiting for E-76 2,000 0 Ongoing - Awaiting NEPA 4 Traffic Signal Coordination Grant Design and Construction Traffic Signal Coordination clearance 5 Administration of Programmed Projects Administration /00 0 Not Charged TOTALS 5,800 134 Riverside (only Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF RIVERSIDE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 242 Public Works Department CITY OF City of Arts &Innovation May 6, 2016 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn.: Ms. Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager 1,C)ECEOVEM1 MAY 06 2016 TRANSPORTATIIQN DE COMMISSION Subject: Measure A Maintenance of Effort, CIP and Project Status Report Enclosed are the City of Riverside's FY 2016/17 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement, Measure A Local Funds Capital Improvement Program for FY 2016/17 through FY 2020/21 and a status report for FY 2015/16. If you have any questions, please contact Patrick Keeney at (951) 826-2406. Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments 0 3900 Main Street • Riverside, CA 92522 • te1951?'06.5341 • fax 951.826.5542 • www.riversideca.gov FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Riverside (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $12,449,203, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: /67. 3 , 2016 244 APPROVED AS TO FORivi CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status Report Expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 19,357 6,797 -8,244 17,910 7,511 25,421 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 1 Arlington Ave - Fairhaven to City Limit Traffic Safety Improvements 1,313 *557 2 Arlington Ave - Van Buren to SR 91 Street Resurfacing 2,050 *91 3 Bike Conflict Zone Improvements Bicycle & Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 156 *35 4 Campbell & Babb Ave Sidewalks Sidewalk Construction 428 *165 5 Canyon Crest Widening - Via Vista to Country Club Street Widening 6,105 1,000 G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 245 Page 1 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 6 Central/Canyon Crest/Watkins Bike Lanes Bike Lanes & Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 1,257 215 7 Central Ave/UPRR Crossing Improvements Railroad Crossing Improvements 170 *160 8 High Friction Surface & HAWK Signals Street & Pedestrian Signal Improvements 1,293 195 9 Indiana - Vallejo to Auto Center Pavement Rehabilitation 3,350 *966 10 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,115 *420 11 Iowa Ave Railroad Crossing Improvements Railroad Crossing Improvements 250 *235 12 Jurupa Ave Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 *300 13 Jurupa Ave Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 6,247 *1 14 Magnolia Widening - Buchanan to Banbury Street Widening 6,331 *3,260 a\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 246 Page 2 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) 2016-2017 15 Major Street Rehabilitation 14/15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Major Street Rehabilitation Market Street Bridge Replacement Misc. Railroad Project Management Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Monroe Rehab - Lincoln to Arlington Street Resurfacing Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Grade Separations/Quiet Zones City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Resurfacing 4,080 2,650 100 1,372 1,233 2,400 Measure A Funds ($000's) *41 500 *1,950 *100 *475 100 *190 2,400 Paving Projects COP - Debt Service** Street Paving 3,003 3,003 **For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. a\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 3 of 15 247 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 22 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Railroad Quiet Zone 17,430 *1 23 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone 4,020 *20 24 Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone 4,458 751 *1,469 25 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Railroad Quiet Zone 2,250 *150 26 Railroad Grade Separation - Iowa Grade Separation 31,222 *84 27 Railroad Grade Separation - Magnolia Grade Separation 50,917 *1 28 Railroad Grade Separation - Riverside Grade Separation 31,184 *61 29 Railroad Grade Separation - Streeter Grade Separation 33,971 *1,204 30 10% Measure A Rail Set -Aside Grade Separations/Quiet Zones 7 *7 G:1Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 248 Page 4 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 31 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 11,700 *2,339 32 Van Buren - Indiana to South City Limit Street Widening 26,750 *8 33 Van Buren - Washington to Wood Street Widening 253 *132 34 3rd/Blaine Bike Lanes -Mulberry to Watkins Street Widening & Restriping 383 *23 35 Arterial Interconnections Traffic Signal Coordination 630 40 *30 36 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Traffic Signal Coordination 75 - 37 Magnolia - Buchanan to First Traffic Signal Coordination 1,876 *489 38 Traffic Signal Revisions Traffic Signal Modifications 1,654 100 *177 G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 249 Page 5 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 39 New Traffic Signals - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 40 University - Brockton to Campus Traffic Signal Coordination 50 *50 41 University - Protected/Permissive Left Turns Traffic Signal Modifications 125 *125 42 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 43 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 44 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 45 LED Signal Lenses Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 46 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 47 Traffic Management Center Traffic Signal Coordination 125 125 a\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 250 Page 6 of 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2016-2017 48 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 49 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 265,133 24,595 * Indicates estimated prior fiscal years Measure A funding carried over to 7/1/16. GAAdmin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 251 Page 7 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 826 7,661 8,487 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Canyon Crest Widening - Via Vista to Country Club 2 3 4 5 6 Major Street Rehabilitation Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Traffic Signal Improvements Street Widening Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 6,105 2,400 1,233 3,000 2,250 315 650 2,400 100 3,000 766 315 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 8 of 15 252 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 7 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 8 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 9 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 10 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 16,028 7,956 G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 253 Page 9 of 15 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 531 7,814 8,345 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 2 3 4 5 6 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn, 3rd & Spruce Traffic Signal Improvements Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 2,400 1,233 3,000 2,250 4,020 315 2,400 100 3,000 684 98 315 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. a\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 10 of 15 254 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 7 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 8 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 9 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 10 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 13,943 7,322 G:Wdmin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 11 of 15 255 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 1,023 8,048 9,071 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2019-2020 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 2 3 4 5 6 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service` Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn, 3rd & Spruce Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision New Traffic Signal Installation 2,400 1,233 3,000 4,020 315 250 2,400 500 3,000 805 315 250 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 12 of 15 256 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2019-2020 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 9 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 11,693 7,745 G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 13 of 15 257 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 1,326 8,289 9,615 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2020-2021 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 2 3 4 5 6 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Paving Projects COP - Debt Service' Street Resurfacing City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement Street Paving Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn, 3rd & Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision New Traffic Signal Installation 2,400 1,233 3,000 4,020 315 250 2,400 500 3,000 829 315 250 "For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 14 of 15 258 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2021 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 20, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2020-2021 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 9 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS 11,693 7,769 G:\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A CIP 2017-2021 05202016 Page 15 of 15 259 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2015-16 Agency: City of Riverside Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 17, 2016 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) ESTIMATED MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) EXPENDED 15/16 STATUS 1 Arlington Ave - Fairhaven to West City Limit Traffic Safety Improvements 1,313 21 Design in progress. 2 Arlington Ave Rehab - Van Buren to SR 91 Street Resurfacing 2,050 - Design in progress. 3 Brockton Avenue Bike Lanes Street Rehabilitation & Restriping 1,453 16 Project is complete. 4 Central Ave at UPRR Crossing Railroad Crossing Improvements 170 10 Design in progress. 5 Collett Extension - Napa to Buchanan New Street Construction 2,836 1 Project is complete. 6 Indiana - Vallejo to Auto Center Pavement Rehabilitation 3,350 500 Construction contract awarded in November 2015. 7 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,115 - Pending billing from school district. 8 Jurupa Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 - Design in progress. 9 Jurupa Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 6,247 - Construction complete. Required environmental mitigation still underway. 10 Magnolia Ave - Buchanan St to Banbury Dr Street Widening and Improvements 6,331 30 Design in progress. 11 Major Street Rehabilitation 14/15 Street Resurfacing 4,080 925 Construction complete. Project close out in progress. 12 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing 2,150 200 Construction contract awarded in March 2016. 13 Market Street Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement 100 - Project on hold pending availability of funding. 14 Miscelllaneous Railroad Project Management Grade Separations/Quiet Zones 1,372 43 Ongoing project management. 260 a\Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A Status 2015 05172016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2015-16 Agency: City of Riverside Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 17, 2016 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) ESTIMATED MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) EXPENDED 15/16 STATUS 15 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement 1,233 7 City share for County administered project. 16 Paving Projects COP - Debt Serivce Street Paving 2,996 2,996 Annual debt service. 17 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Quiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 17,430 6 Phase III railroad work is underway. 18 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Quiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 4,020 - Design in progress. 19 Quiet Zone/BNSF/UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Quiet Zone for BNSF & UP Railroads 4,458 50 Design in progress. 20 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Quiet Zone for UP Railroad 2,250 50 Design in progress. 21 RR Grade Separation - Iowa Avenue Grade Separation - Iowa @ BNSF 31,222 6 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 22 RR Grade Separation - Magnolia Avenue Grade Separation - Magnolia @ UPRR 50,917 5 Project construction is complete. Close out right-of-way pending. 23 RR Grade Separation - Riverside Avenue Grade Separation - Riverside @ UPRR 31,184 16 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 24 RR Grade Separation - Streeter Avenue Grade Separation - Streeter @ UPRR 33,971 4 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 25 10% Measure A Rail Set -Aside Grade Separations 7 - For debt service or allocation to specific projects. 26 Sidewalk/Trail Construction 13/14 Sidewalk Construction 76 - Project is complete. 261 a: Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 PAMeasure A Status 2015 05172016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2015-16 Apencv: City ofRiverside Pape 3 of 5 Prepared bv: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 17, 2016 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) ESTIMATED MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) EXPENDED 15/16 STATUS 27 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 11,700 1,800 Construction contract awarded in August 2015. 28 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Indiana to South Street Widening 26,750 1 Project on hold until funding is available. City Limit 29 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Jurupa to Santa Street Widening 641 - Project is complete. Ana River Bridge 30 Van Buren Blvd / 91 Frwy Interchange Interchange Improvements 30,436 - Project is complete. 31 3rd/Blaine Bike Lanes Street Rehabilitation & Restriping 383 7 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 32 Arterial Interconnections Signal Coordinations 590 - Current funding to be used for specific projects. 33 Brockton Protected/Permissive Left Turns Signal Modifications 100 - Project is complete. 34 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Signal Coordinations 75 3 On -going signal coordination work. 35 LED Luminaire Safety Lighting Intersection Safety Lighting 111 111 Project is complete. Improvements 36 Magnolia - Buchanan to First Signal Coordination 1,876 - Design in progress. 37 Traffic Signal Revisions Signal Modifications 1,554 250 Project is underway. 38 New Traffic Signals New Traffic Signals 190 - Funds used for specific projects. 262 G:Wdmin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A Status 2015 05172016 RIVERSIDE. COUNTY TRAN.S'PORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2015-16 Agency: City of Riverside Pape 4 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keene', Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 17, 2016 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) ESTIMATED MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) EXPENDED 15/16 STATUS 39 Rumsey - Central New Traffic Signal 250 248 Project is complete. 40 University - Brockton to Campus Signal Coordination 50 - Design in progress. 41 University - Protect/Permit Left Turns Signal Modifications 125 - Design in progress. 42 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 Ongoing annual expenditure. 43 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 Ongoing annual expenditure. 44 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 Ongoing annual expenditure. 45 LED Signal Lenses Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 Ongoing annual expenditure. 46 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 17 17 Ongoing annual expenditure. 47 Traffic Management Center Signal Coordination 148 85 Ongoing annual expenditure. 48 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 Ongoing annual expenditure. 49 Traffic Planning/Investigations Traffic Engineering 301 300 Ongoing annual expenditure. 50 Sidewalk Repair Sidewalk Repair 1,022 180 Project is complete. 51 Iowa Ave Railroad Crossing Improvements Railroad Crossing Improvements 250 15 Design in progress. 52 Campbell & Babb Ave Sidewalks Sidewalk Construction 428 50 Design in progress. 53 Bike Conflict Zone Improvements Bicycle 8 Pedestrian Crossing 156 - Design in progress. Improvements 263 G:1Admin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A Status 2015 05172016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY 2015-16 AQencv: City of Riverside Page 5 of 5 Prenared bv: Patrick Keenev Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: Mav 17, 2016 Project No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) ESTIMATED MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) EXPENDED 15/16 STATUS 54 Van Buren Widening - Washington to Wood Street Widening 253 1 City contribution for County project. TOTALS 290,327 8,244 264 GAAdmin\Common\Measure A Maintenance of Effort\16 17 FY\Measure A Status 2015 05172016 NEM IIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 266 \'o�s aLallo► . Juan C.Perez, P.E., T. E Director of Transportation and Land Management May 5, 2016 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department Ms. Grace Alvarez Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation] Commission 4080 S. Lemon St., Third floor Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Dear Ms. Alvarez: Patricia Romo, P.E. Assistant Director of Transportation Attached is the County's five-year program of projects for the County's portion of Measure A funds for Fiscal Year 2017/2021. The County's Transportation Department receives no general funds and no certification of MOE is included. Also attached is a copy of our Fiscal Year 2016/2020 plan with comments addressing project status, project additions and delays. We have scheduled expenditures based on revenue projections. Three reports are attached representing the Western, Coachella Valley and the Palo Verde Valley regions, respectively. These projects are incorporated in the County's proposed Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) which is planned for Board approval. We will inform your agency of any changes that occur to the Measure A program due to future revisions of the County's TIP. If you have any questions concerning this program, please feel free to contact me at (951) 955-6740. Sincerely, Patricia Romo Assistant Director of Transportation RKN: attachments cc: Ed Cooper 4080 Lemon Street, 8'h Floor Riverside, California 92501 • (951) 955-6740 P.O. Box 1090 • Riverside, Califg617t 92502-1090 • FAX (951) 955-3198 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Western County Region $ x 1,000 FY 14/15 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 3,014 FY 2015-2016 Measure A Revenue: $ 5,238 FY 2015-2016 Status Report Expenses: 8,252 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure AAllocation: $ 5,729 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 5,729 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2016-2017 1 BRIGGS RD & BAXTER RD: -- Loan Payback for road improvements built 447 180 3 2 CABAZON AREA RESURFACING GROUP: ResurfAC paved road 1,754 1 5 13 Various Streets -- 3 CHIP SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 420 420 1 FY16/17 4 CHIP SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,015 1,015 3 FY16/17 5 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 257 257 5 FY16/17 6 I-10 BYPASS: Hargrave St -- Apache TrI Construct road 55,079 150 5 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds 819 1 3 Various locations Countywide 8 SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES Develop Plans of Action for bridges 1,119 50 3 9 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 1,213 1,056 1 FY16/17 10 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 685 670 2 FY16/17 11 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 1,479 1,382 3 FY16/17 12 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 552 547 5 FY16/17 TOTALS 64,839 5,729 268 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,844 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 5,844 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 1 CHIP SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 693 548 1 FY17/18 2 CHIP SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,170 848 3 FY17/18 3 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 446 267 5 FY17/18 4 1-10 BYPASS: Hargrave St -- Apache Trl Construct road 55,079 150 5 5 SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES Develop Plans of Action for bridges 1,119 50 3 6 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 1,256 1,234 1 FY17/18 7 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 228 223 2 FY17/18 8 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 2,245 2,206 3 FY17/18 9 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 325 318 5 FY17/18 TOTALS 62,561 5,844 269 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,961 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 5,961 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 1 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 1 Only-- Pavement Rehab 1,964 1,964 1 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 3 Only -- Pavement Rehab 3,040 3,040 3 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 5 Only -- Pavement Rehab 957 957 5 TOTALS 5,961 5,961 270 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 6,140 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 6,140 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2019-2020 1 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 1 Only -- Pavement Rehab 2,023 2,023 1 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 3 Only -- Pavement Rehab 3,131 3,131 3 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 5 Only -- Pavement Rehab 986 986 5 TOTALS 6,140 6,140 271 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 6,324 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 6,324 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2020-2021 1 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 1 Only -- Pavement Rehab 2,084 2,084 1 2 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 3 Only -- Pavement Rehab 3,225 3,225 3 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 5 Only -- Pavement Rehab 1,015 1,015 5 TOTALS 6,324 6,324 272 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 BRIGGS RD & BAXTER RD: -- Loan Payback for road improvements built 447 15 FY 16/17 Ongoing 3 2 CABAZON AREA RESURFACING Resurf AC paved road 1754 54 FY 17/18 Ongoing 5 GROUP: 13 Various Streets -- 3 CABAZON ST: Dolores Ave - Resurf AC paved road 210 210 Complete 5 Carmen Ave 4 CAMINO DEL SOL AREA GROUP Resurf AC paved road 380 68 Complete 1 2: 2 Area Streets -- 5 CITRUS VIEW DR: Fairview Ave - Tangelo Ave Resurf AC paved road 131 131 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 3 6 DECKER RD: Martin St - Markham Resurf RMS paved road 224 224 Complete 1 St 7 FAIRVIEW AVE: 649' S Bautista Rd - Bautista Rd Resurf AC paved road 54 54 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 3 8 Indian Truck Trail: at 1-215 Interchange Widen roadway and ramps, const. signals 8860 105 Complete 1 9 MANDARIN DR: Tangelo Ave - Citrus View Dr Resurf AC paved road 106 106 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 3 10 MARGARTH ST: S.H. 74 - Marie St Resurf RMS paved road 104 91 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 1 11 MARIE ST: Margarth St - Mapes Rd Resurf RMS paved road 102 97 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 1 273 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 12 MOUNTAIN AVE: Theda St - Baxter Rd Resurf RMS paved road 245 245 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 1 13 PERRY ST: Decker Rd - Seaton Ave Resurf RMS paved road 176 176 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 1 14 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD: DeLuz Reconst AC paved road 3617 363 Complete 1 Rd -- Temecula City Limits 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds 819 127 FY 19/20 Ongoing 3 Various locations -- Countywide 16 SAGE RD - 2 SEGMENTS: Red Reconst AC paved road 1230 904 Complete 3 Mnt Rd -- Nly Red Mnt Rd .62 mi 17 SOPHIE ST: Mapes Rd - Mountain Ave Resurf RMS paved road 121 121 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 1 18 SOPHIE ST: Mountain Ave - S.H. 74 Resurf RMS paved road 29 29 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 1 19 SPEED WARNING SIGNS: 5 Various Locations -- Install solar -powered speed feedback signs 597 94 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 1 20 STAGECOACH RD: Horseshoe Trl - 2682' E Horseshoe Trl Resurf RMS paved road 129 111 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 5 21 STAGECOACH RD: Juniper Flats Rd - Horseshoe Trl Resurf RMS paved road 225 201 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 5 22 TANGELO AVE: Mandarin Dr - Citrus View Dr Resurf AC paved road 26 26 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 3 23 THORNTON AVE: 1000'W Tierra Verde Dr - Lake St Resurf AC paved road 102 102 Scheduled to complete in FY 15/16 Ongoing 3 24 WHITTIER AVE: Yale St -- Cornell St Const sidewalk on Sly side W. of Columbia 869 106 Complete 3 25 BEAUVIEW DR: Oak Creek Rd -- Reconst AC paved road 109 76 Complete 5 Oak View Ln 274 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 26 CHERRY OAK RD: Oak Glen Rd -- Reconst AC paved road 97 52 Complete 5 Oak Creek Rd 27 FRONTAGE RD: Rainbow Canyon Resurf RMS paved road 387 45 Complete 3 Rd / N -- San Diego C.L. 28 MAIN ST: Michigan Ave Install traffic signal 927 13 FY 16/17 Ongoing. Using other funds in 5 16/17 29 RAINBOW CANYON RD: Frontage Resurf RMS paved road 247 47 Complete 3 Rd / N -- San Diego C.L. 30 CHIP SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT Chip seal 565 565 Complete 1 ROADS FY15/16 31 CHIP SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT Chip seal 1324 1324 Complete 3 ROADS FY15/16 32 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT Chip seal 635 635 Complete 5 ROADS FY15/16 33 SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES Develop Plans of Action for bridges 1119 50 FY 19/20 Ongoing. Using other funds in future years 3 34 WINCHESTER RD (SR-79N): Thompson Rd -- Domenigoni Pkwy Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes + L. turn lane 16083 850 FY 16/17 Ongoing. Using other funds in 3 16/17 35 WINCHESTER RD (SR-79N): Scott Rd -- Domenigoni Pkwy Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes + L. turn lane 20197 400 FY 16/17 Ongoing. Using other funds in 3 16/17 36 WINCHESTER RD (SR-79N) BASIN: NW quadrant of SR 79 & Const detetion basin 435 435 FY 16/17 Ongoing. Using other funds in 3 Newport Rd 16/17 TOTALS 62,682 8,252 275 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 FY 14/15 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 843 FY 2015-2016 Measure A Revenue: $ 2,071 FY 2015-2016 Status Report Expenses: 2,914 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ - Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,924 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 1,924 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2016-2017 1 BUCHANAN ST: 62nd Ave -- 2387' S 60th Ave Resurf RMS paved road 363 229 4 2 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 2,141 1,351 4 FY16/17 3 FILLMORE ST : 64th Ave -- 62nd Ave Resurf RMS paved road 270 170 4 4 JACKSON ST: 58th Ave -- Airport Blvd Resurf RMS paved road 277 174 4 TOTALS 3,051 1,924 276 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,962 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 1,962 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,441 1,200 4 FY17/18 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 562 562 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,203 1,962 277 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,001 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 2,001 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,546 1,300 4 FY18/19 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 501 501 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,247 2,001 278 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,061 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 2,061 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2019-2020 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,603 1,350 4 FY19/20 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 511 511 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,314 2,061 279 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 2,123 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 2,123 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2020-2021 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,661 1,400 4 FY19/20 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 523 523 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,384 2,123 280 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Coachella Valley Region Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 66TH Ave: Van Buren St -- Harrison Resurf AC paved road 497 35 Complete 4 St 2 HARRION ST: NW'ly Pierce St -- Resurf AC paved road 312 76 Complete 4 Sly Pierce St 3 LANDFILL RD: Dillon Rd -- Ely Resurf AC paved road 850 58 Complete 4 4 MONTEREY AVE AT I-10: C.L. Palm Desert -- N'Iy Varner Rd 0.1 mi Realign/Add W.bound ramps, Widen Varner Rd 326 15 Complete 4 5 PORTOLA AVE 1-10 INTERCHANGE: Between Monterey Av IC -- Cook St IC Const new interchange 30 25 FY 19/20 Start PS&E. Other funds will pay for costs in future years. 4 6 TYLER ST: N'ly 66th Ave 0.46mi -- Reconst AC paved road 423 41 Complete 4 N'Iy 66th Ave 1.0mi 7 58TH AVE: Monroe St - Jackson St Resurf RMS paved road 198 150 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 8 68TH AVE: Lincoln St - 2664' W Resurf RMS paved road 115 89 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 Lincoln St 9 70TH AVE: Fillmore St - Harrison St Resurf RMS paved road 419 350 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 10 CALHOUN ST: 55th Ave - 54th Ave Resurf AC paved road 289 47 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 11 CALHOUN ST: 54th Ave - 53rd Ave Resurf AC paved road 299 50 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 12 FILLMORE ST: 70th Ave - 3710' S Resurf RMS paved road 160 127 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 70th Ave 281 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 13 FILLMORE ST: 3710' S 70th Ave - Resurf RMS paved road 71 81 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 72nd Ave 14 FILLMORE ST: 72nd Ave - 73rd Ave Resurf RMS paved road 115 94 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 15 POLK ST: 70th Ave - 68th Ave Resurf RMS paved road 425 401 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 16 60th AVE: Pierce St -- Buchanan St Resurf RMS paved road 183 14 Complete 4 17 60th AVE: Buchanan St -- Lincoln St Resurf RMS paved road 210 59 Complete 4 18 BUCHANAN ST: 58th Ave -- Airport Resurf RMS paved road 305 30 Complete 4 Blvd 19 PIERCE ST: 60th Ave -- 58th Ave Resurf RMS paved road 223 31 Complete 4 20 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT Chip Seal 2,410 1,089 Complete 4 ROADS FY15/16 21 HARRISON ST: 54th Ave -- Airport Resurf AC paved road 848 52 FY 15/16 Under Construction 4 Blvd TOTALS 8,708 2,914 282 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 FY 14/15 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 118 FY 2015-2016 Measure A Revenue: $ 236 FY 2015-2016 Status Report Expenses: 354 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: $ 236 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 236 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2016-2017 Chip seal 2,141 236 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY16/17 TOTALS 2,141 236 283 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 241 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 241 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 Chip seal 1,441 241 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY17/18 TOTALS 1,441 241 284 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 246 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 246 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 Chip seal 1,546 246 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY18/19 TOTALS 1,546 246 285 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 253 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 253 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2019-2020 Chip seal 253 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY19/20 TOTALS 0 253 286 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 261 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 261 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2020-2021 Chip seal 1,661 261 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY19/20 TOTALS 1,661 261 287 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: Riverside County Page of Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/16 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 C & D Blvd: 6th Ave to 8th Ave Resurf RMS paved road 236 179 FY 15/16 Scheduled to finish late FY 15/16 4 2 C & D Blvd: 8th Ave to 10th Ave Resurf RMS paved road 235 80 FY 15/16 Scheduled to finish late FY 15/16 4 3 04TH AVE: Hunter Ave -- SH 95 Resurf RMS paved road 117 95 Complete 4 TOTALS 588 354 288 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 290 SANJ ACINTO May 3, 2016 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager RE: 2016-21 Measure "A" Improvement Plan and 2015-16 Status Report Enclosed please find the City of San Jacinto's proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed is a status report of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE certification. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Please call me at 951-487-7340 or Habib Motlagh at 951-654-3592 if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, �� Thomas Prill Finance Director 595 S. San Jacinto Ave. 1 San Jacinto, CA 92583 C Ph (95r�m4-7337 i Fax (951) 654-3728 j W ww.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of San Jacinto (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $156,391, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated:''' , 2016 CITY MANAGER 292 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/4/2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2016) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Warren Road Pavement Rehab 20 20 Complete 2 Esplanade Avenue Pavement Rehab 1,000 51 Phase 1 Construction (Warren Rd to Mountain) Advertising (CON Start - August 2016) 3 San Jacinto Avenue (City Limits) Pavement Rehab 600 25 Caltrans reviewing documents 4 Misc Traffic Study & Reports & 100 15 On -going Improvements Improvements 5 De Anza Drive (ATP) Bike Lane, Widening, Sidewalk 1,000 75 Completing Bid Documents & State Review TOTALS 2,720 186 293 ATTACHMENT B SAMPLE FIVE-YEAR CIP FORMAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/4/2016 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $ 2,529,047 $ 782,000 $ 186,000 $ 3,125,047 $ 830,000 $ 3,955,047 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 San Jacinto Ave (Main St to Menlo Ave) Pavement Rehab 600 180 2 Misc Traffic Control & Devices Traffic Operations 100 50 3 Downtown Pavement including State St Pavement Rehab 1,000 500 4 Esplanade Ave (Construct in Phases) Pavement Rehab 1,000 1,000 (State St to Ramona Exwy) 5 De Anza Drive (ATP) Bike Lane, Widening, Sidewalk 1,000 35 6 Ramona Exwy Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 300 300 (East of Lake Park) TOTALS 4,000 2,065 294 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/4/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,890,047 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 847,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,737,047 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Slurry Seal Project Pavement Rehab 1,000 650 (City Wide) 2 Ramona Expressway Pavement Rehab 1,000 600 (Sanderson Ave to City Limits) 3 Sanderson Ave Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 800 800 (Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave) TOTALS 2,800 2,050 295 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/4/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 687,047 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 864,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 1,551,047 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Esplanade Avenue Pavement Rehab & 2,500 500 (Sanderson to Warren) Widening 2 Slurry Seal Project Pavement Rehab 1,200 500 (City Wide) 3 Downtown Pavement Improvements Pavement Rehab 1,000 300 TOTALS 4,700 1,300 296 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/4/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 251,047 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 890,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,141,047 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Slurry Seal Project Pavement Rehab 1,000 500 (City Wide) 2 State Street Pavement Rehab 1,500 300 (Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave) TOTALS 2,500 800 297 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 5/4/20 / 6 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 341,047 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 917,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,258,047 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Citywide Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Rehab 1,000 600 2 Downtown Pavement Improvements Pavement Rehab 300 300 TOTALS 1,300 900 298 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF TEMECULA FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 MOE CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 300 May 3, 2016 City of Temecula Department of Public Works 41000 Main Street ■ Temecula, CA 92590 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 ■ Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Phone (951 ) 694-641 1 ■ Fax (951 ) 694-6475 ■ www.cityoftemecula.org E C E `J iE n a �� MAY 06 2010 RIVERSID COUNTII TRANSPORTATION COMMkSS1ON Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 Re: FY2017-2021 Measure 'A' Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan, MOE Certification and Project Status Report Dear Ms. Alvarez; Attached please find the City of Temecula's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Measure 'A' funds, including our Project Status Report. The City's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement is also enclosed for your review and approval. All of the projects submitted are included in the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program, scheduled for approval by City Council at their regular meeting of June 14, 2016. If any changes are incorporated subsequent to this meeting, a revised five-year plan will be submitted to you. If you require any additional information, please contact me at (951) 506-5163. Tom Garcia Director of Public Works/City Engineer Enclosures cc: Jennifer Hennessy - Director of Finance Rudy Graciano — Revenue Manager Printed on Recycled Paper R:\CIP DIVISION\STAFF\JulieT\PUBWKSWeasureA FY2017-21coverltr.jc.doc 301 FY 2016/17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Temecula (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,431,799, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 3, 2016 Aaron Adams, City Manager Rand: Johl, City Clerk 302 ATTACHMENT B CITY OF TEMECULA FIVE-YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Temecula Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 02, 2016 FY2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: FY2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: 3,817,647 2,747,000 (1,008,000) 5,556,647 3,086,000 8,642,647 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2016-2017 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 6,054,156 5,004,156 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainaae Facilities 1,820,240 1,820,240 3 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Winchester Road Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,518,573 872,383 TOTALS 9,392,969 7,696,779 303 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Temecula Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 02, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: 945,868 3,148,000 4,093,868 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,141,219 1,141,219 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,820,240 1,820,240 TOTALS 2,961,459 2,961,459 304 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Temecula Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 02, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: 1,132,409 3,211,000 4,343,409 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,223,092 1,223,092 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street 8 ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,820,240 1,820,240 TOTALS 3,043,332 3,043,332 305 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Temecula Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 02, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: 1,300,077 3,307,000 4,607,077 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,308,973 1,308,973 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,820,240 1,820,240 TOTALS 3,129,213 3,129,213 306 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Temecula Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 02, 2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 1,477,864 3,406,000 4,883,864 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,339,038 1,339,038 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, Street & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities 1,820,240 1,820,240 TOTALS 3,159,278 3,159,278 307 ATTACHMENT D **SAMPLE PROJECT STATUS REPORT FORMAT** RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Temecula Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 02, 2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) Estimated/Actual Completion Status 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction 8 Rehabilitation 7,327 380 Annual pavement rehabilitation program On -going annual pavement rehabilitation oroiects 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include: Striping/Stenciling, PCC 8 AC Repairs, Street 8 ROW Maintenance of nminano Farilitioc 1,765 603 Annual right -of- way maintenance On -going annual ROW maintenance projects 3 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Winchester Road Street Reconstruction 8 Rehabilitation 1,530 25 Estimated Completion - September 2016 RFA submitted to Ca!trans 8 in process of review. Construction anticipated to begin Aunuat9n1R TOTALS 10,622 1,008 308 MEIIIM il.m.--____ Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Streets and Roads CITY OF WILDOMAR FIVE YEAR CIP 2017-2021 AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT CIP FY 15/16 This page left intentionally blank. 310 May 31, 2016 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: City of Wildomar's Measure A Expenditure Plan Dear Ms. Trevino: Please find enclosed the Measure A Expenditure Plan for the City of Wildomar. On June 24th, 2015, the Wildomar City Council approved the Wildomar Biennial Operating Budget Fiscal Years 2015-16 & 2016-17. The City restated a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and this adjustment was approved at the March 12, 2014 Riverside County Transportation Commission meeting. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email mbennettCc7cityofwildomar.orq or directly at (951) 297-3396. Sincerely, Matt Bennett, P.E. Deputy City Engineer 311 FY 2015/16 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of W ildomar (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $0, approved by the Commission at its March 12, 2014 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: )11-a-4-;- a / , 2015 sECRIETARI CI ry c1 Fe.K. 312 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2021 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 FY 2014-15 Audited Measure A Balance: Date: 6/2/2016 FY 2015-16 Measure A Revenue: FY 2015-16 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2016-2017 Projects: $599,835 $565,000 $515,170 $649,665 $607,000 $1,256,665 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements $20,000 $20,000 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $325,000 $325,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 ROW mainatenance and $127,000 $127,000 5 Citywide Maintenance Program repair 6 Bundy Canyon Road Safety Improvements Dirt shoulder improvements and signage $252,200 $15,000 7 Grand Ave. & Clinton Keith Rd. Bike Paths Class II and III Bike Paths $949,500 $10,000 8 Grand Ave. Bike Paths - Corydon to BMS Class II Bike Paths $863,340 $10,000 9 Grand Ave. Multi Use Trail Design Multipurpose trail $135,000 $20,000 10 Master Plan of Drainage Update Update MDP $20,000 $20,000 11 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $48,560 $48,560 TOTALS $2,815,600 $670,560 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2021 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/2/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $586,105 $619, 000 $1, 205,105 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements $20,000 $20,000 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $300,000 $300,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 ROW mainatenance and $127,000 $127,000 5 Citywide Maintenance Program repair 6 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $49,520 $49,520 TOTALS $571,520 $571,520 314 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2021 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/2/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $633,585 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 631,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 1,264,585 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $20,000 $20,000 ADA improvements 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $350,000 $350,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 5 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; storm damage/ flood control projects; widening streets $127,000 $127,000 6 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $50,480 $50,480 TOTALS $622,480 $622,480 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2021 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/2/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 642,105 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 650,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,292,105 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $20,000 $20,000 ADA improvements 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $350,000 $350,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 5 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; $127,000 $127,000 6 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $52,000 $52,000 TOTALS $624,000 $624,000 316 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2021 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: 6/2/2016 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 668,105 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 670,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,338,105 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $20,000 $20,000 ADA improvements 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety $40,000 $40,000 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $350,000 $350,000 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways $35,000 $35,000 5 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; $127,000 $127,000 6 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $53,600 $53,600 TOTALS $625,600 $625,600 317 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2015-2016 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Matt Bennett, Deputy City Engineer Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date. 6/2/2016 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Accessibility Improvements (Almond Street Sidewalk) Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and $240,400 $27,000 - Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 2 Road Safety Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related $7,000 $7,000 - Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 3 Pavement Maintenance Program Remove, repair, crack fill, slurry seal as needed $152,600 $17,670 Winter 2016 NOC filed 4 Pavement Repair Program (Replaced Roadway Imp. to Unpaved Rds.) Repair or reconstruct roadways $10,000 $10,000 - Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. 5 George Avenue Sidewalk Sidewalk improvement $139,430 $5,000 Spring 2015 NOC filed 6 Bundy Canyon Road Safety Improvements Dirt shoulder improvements and signage $252,200 $25,300 Winter 2015 PE 7 Grand Ave. Bike Paths - Corydon to BMS Class II and III Bike Path: $949,500 $70,000 Fall 2016 90% PS&E (Grand Ave. & Clinton Keith Rd. Bike Paths) 8 Grand Ave. Bike Paths - Corydon to BMS Class II Bike Paths $863,340 $53,000 Fall 2016 90% PS&E 9 Grand Ave. Multi Use Trail $135.000 $57,000 Fall 2016 90% PS&E Design Multipurpose trail 10 Clinton Keith/Hidden Springs Traffic Signal Signal modification $110,000 $11,000 Winter 2016 Modification Project NOC filed 11 Master Plan of Drainage Update Update MDP $80,000 $80,000 Fall 2016 Research 12 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling: $107,000 $107,000 - Ongoing program. Unexpended funds will carry over. repairs to streets and culvert/ drainage facilities; storm damage/ 13 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer $45,200 $45,200 (8% of Measure A revenue) TOTALS 3,091,670 515,170 Project 9, 10, and 11 in italics are projects adopted by Wildomar's City Council on Feb 12, 2014 as part of the Five -Year CIP, and the budgets were amended by the Dec. 10th, 2014 and the April 8th, 2015. In the 4th quarter, City Council will reappropriate funds to address the increase and decrease in project funding listed above. 318 AGENDA ITEM 8G RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Blythe for Trading 2012 and 2014 State Transportation Improvement Program Funds for 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Highway Funds BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 07-71-028-01, Amendment No. 1 to MOU No. 07-71-028-00 with the city of Blythe (Blythe) to trade Palo Verde Valley 2012 and 2014 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds with 2009 Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds in the amount of $1,106,410; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the MOU on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Approve an increase of $1,106,410 in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budgeted expenditures for construction. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On January 11, 2006, the Commission approved the mechanism for trading STIP intracounty Palo Verde Valley formula funds with Blythe for Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds. The STIP intracounty MOU established three geographic areas to receive STIP funds: Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley/Blythe. The Palo Verde Valley/Blythe area STIP funds have been historically under 1 percent of the available STIP funds and therefore address relatively minor projects on the local arterial system. Due to the California Transportation Commission's low priority for allocating STIP funds on local arterials, the MOU allowed Blythe to move forward with its projects using local funds. The MOU included the 2004 and 2006 STIP funding cycles. STIP funds were not available in the 2008 and 2010 STIP cycles. The 2012 and 2014 STIP cycles did result in available STIP capacity; however, the amendments to include the new trade funding were not executed, as the city had remaining funds from the previous 2004 and 2006 STIP cycles. Recently, Blythe submitted an invoice to the Commission for reimbursable STIP projects identified in the city's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). To approve the invoice staff Agenda Item 8G 133 requests approval of an amendment to the MOU to reflect the 2012 STIP Cycle trade in the amount of $641,588 and the 2014 STIP Cycle trade in the amount of $464,822, for an additional amount of $1,106,410. The MOU amendment amount is not included in the FY 2016/17 budget; therefore, staff recommends a budget adjustment to reimburse the city for STIP projects identified in its CIP. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $1,106,410 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Highway funds Budget Adjustment: Yes GL/Project Accounting No.: 623994 81301 00000 0000 262 31 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \pi,,ataj Date: 06/14/2016 Attachment: MOU No. 07-71-028-01 (Draft) Agenda Item 8G 134 Agreement No. 07-71-028-01 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF BLYTHE FOR TRADING STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INTRACOUNTY PALO VERDE VALLEY FORMULA FUNDS 1 PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for trading state transportation improvement program (STIP) is made and entered into as of this day of , 2016, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") and the City of Blythe ("City"). 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the City have entered into an MOU dated November 14, 2006 for the purpose of providing STIP funds for IntraCounty Palo Verde Valley Formula Funds ("Project'). 2.2 The parties now desire to amend the MOU in order to provide additional compensation for the construction phase of the Project. 3. TERMS 3.1 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment shall be One Million One Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred Ten Dollars ($1,106,410). 3.2 The total not -to -exceed amount of the MOU, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, shall be increased from Two Million Two Hundred Ninety -One Thousand Six Hundred Fifty -Six Dollars ($2,291,656) to Three Million Three Hundred Ninety -Eight Thousand Sixty -Six Dollars ($3,398,066). 17336.00000\1514236.2 1 135 3.3 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the MOU, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. 17336.00000\ 1514236.2 [Signatures on following page] 2 136 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 07-71-028-01 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY CITY OF BLYTHE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Scott Matas, Chair Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.00000\ 1514236.2 Exhibit C Name Title 137 AGENDA ITEM 8H RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State Route 71/91 Interchange — City of Corona Utility Agreement WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 16-31-070-00 with the city of Corona (Corona) for the relocation of a water line in the revised amount of $588,825, plus a revised contingency amount of $150,207, for a revised total amount not to exceed $736,032; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Approve an increase of $523,300 in Fiscal Year 2016/17 budgeted federal revenues and right of way expenditures for utility relocation costs. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission, in cooperation with Caltrans, proposes to improve the existing State Route 71/State Route 91 interchange in Corona. The proposed project includes constructing a new direct freeway connector ramp from eastbound SR-91 to northbound SR-71 and reconfiguring the eastbound SR-91 entrance ramp between Green River Road and the 71/91 interchange. The proposed project is anticipated to improve mobility on SR-71 and SR-91 by enhancing operations and capacity at the 71/91 interchange. The project will require the Commission to enter into final engineering and construction utility agreements with the various utility owners to relocate underground and overhead telecommunication facilities, underground and overhead electrical facilities, and underground water pipelines. The utility facilities will be relocated both prior to and concurrent with project construction activities. At its April 2016 meeting, the Commission approved utility agreements with Southern California Edison, AT&T, Sprint, and Corona, as well as a preliminary engineering utility agreement with Southern California Gas Company for the final design of the underground natural gas Agenda Item 8H 138 transmission pipeline relocation. The approved agreement with Corona was to relocate an underground water pipeline within the BNSF Railway (BNSF) right of way in the amount of $170,175, plus a contingency of $42,544 for a total amount not to exceed $212,719. When Corona applied for a permit from BNSF, BNSF stated that the new water line was subject to its current licensing fee, which resulted in an increase in the cost by $300,000 and the contingency by $75,000. The license will allow the pipeline to remain in the BNSF right of way in perpetuity. In addition, Corona has updated its estimate to include additional costs for design and design oversight, flagging, material inspection, construction inspection, and additional staff time. Staff recommends the Commission authorize a revised Agreement No. 16-31-070-00 amount of $588,825 with Corona plus a revised contingency of $150,207, for a revised total amount not to exceed $736,032. The increased cost for this utility relocation will be funded by federal earmark funds; however, the additional cost and related funding are not included in the FY 2016/17 budget. Accordingly, staff requests an adjustment to the FY 2016/17 budget. Staff also recommends that the Commission authorize the Executive Director to execute the utility agreement on behalf of the Commission. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $523,313 Source of Funds: Federal earmarks Budget Adjustment: No Yes 003021-414-41410-0000 262-31-41401 $736,032 (including GL/Project Accounting No.: budget adjustment of $523,313) 003021-81402-00068-0000 262-31-81402 $736,032 (including budget adjustment of $523,313) Fiscal Procedures Approved: \li4,stt Date: 06/14/2016 Attachment: Utility Agreement 16-31-070-00 (Draft) Agenda Item 8H 139 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ,mv/"ro UTILITY AGREEMENT (RCTC AGREEMENT NO: 116-31-70-00) RtW 3-5 4) DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POST MILE � - 0 91/71 RPV-91'ROBR2.6^ R|V-71'1.81R3.0 FEDERAL AID NUMBER HPLU21LN6054(066 rsosRxLP*nT|C|pADow oWNEps FILE NUMBER On the project Z YES E] NO On the Utilities Z YES El NO UTILITY AGREEMENT NO,23279 DATE . The Riverside County Transportation Commission, herein after called "ROTC". pnop038o to improve the existing SR 91/8R 71 interchange in the City of Corona. Riverside County. Th e proposed improvements include constructing m new d|nmut flyover connector from eastbound 0F 91 to northbound SR71 and maconfigurimAthe eastbound SIR 91 ramp between Green River Road and the SF91/71 interchange. and City mfCorona 755 Corporation Yard Way Corona, CA 92880 hereinafter called "JVNER."owns and maintains 16" water line adjacent to Prado Road � within the limits ofRCTC'm project which requires relocation mf1Q" water line bmavoid conflicts with proposed Green River On -Ramp Overhead bridge bent. b]accommodate RCTC'8project |tiahereby mutually agreed that: i WORK TO BE DONE In accordance with Notice to Owner No. 23279da1ed April 14, 2010 OWNER shall relocate th8 10" water line adjacent to Prado Road. All work shall be performed substantially in accordance with OVNE<'a Plan No. 2015-01 dated Janumry4. 2010 consisting uf3sheets, a copy ofwhich is on file at RCTC. Deviations from the OVNER'o plan described above initiated by either RCTC or the OWNER, shall be agreed upon by both parties hereto under a Revised Notice to Owner. Such Revised Notices to Owner, approved by RCTC and agreed to/acknowledged by the {VNER, will constitute an approved revision of the OVNEF'a plan described above and are herebymade a part hereof. No work under said deviation shall commence prior to written execution by the OWNER of the Revised Notice to Owner. Changes in the scope ofthe work will require an amendment to this Agreement in addition tothe revised Notice to Owner. 140 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) I2W 6/20102 Page 2 of6 (ROTC AGREEMENT NO: 16.31-70-00) II. LIABILITY FOR WORK Existing facilities are located in their present position pursuant to rights superior to those of the State and will be relocated at RCTC expense, III PERFORMANCE OF WORK OWNER agrees to cause the herein described work to be performed by a contract with the lowest qualified bidder, selected pursuant to a valid competitive bidding procedure, and to furnish or cause to be furnished all necessary labor, materials, tools, and equipment required therefore, and to prosecute said work diligently to completion. Use of out-of-state personnel (or personnel requiring lodging and meal "per diem" expenses) will not be allowed without prior written authorization by RCTC's representative. Requests for such authorization must be contained in OWNER's estimate of actual and necessary relocation costs. OWNER shall include an explanation why local employee or contract labor is not considered adequate for the relocation work proposed. Per Diem expenses shall not exceed the per diem expense amounts allowed under the State's Department of Personnel Administration travel expense guidelines. Work performed directly by Owner's employees falls within the exception of Labor Code Section 1720(a)(1) and does not constitute a public work under Section 1720(a)(2) and is not subject to prevailing wages. OWNER shall verify compliance with this requirement in the administration of its contracts referenced above. Engineering services for locating, making of surveys, preparation of plans, specifications, estimates, supervision, and inspection are to be furnished by the Utility Owner and approved by RCTC. Cost principles for determining the reasonableness and allowability of OWNER's costs shall be determined in accordance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31; 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645; and 18 CFR, Chapter 1, Parts 101, 201 and OMB Circular A-87, as applicable. IV. PAYMENT FOR WORK RCTC shall pay its share of the actual and necessary cost of the herein described work within 45 days after receipt of five (5) copies of OWNER's itemized bill, signed by a responsible official of OWNER's organization and prepared on OWNER's letterhead, compiled on the basis of the actual and necessary cost and expense incurred and charged or allocated to said work in accordance with the uniform system of accounts prescribed for OWNER by the California Public Utilities Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or Federal Communications Commission, whichever is applicable. It is understood and agreed that RCTC will not pay for any betterment or increase in capacity of OWNER's facilities in the new location and that OWNER shall give credit to RCTC for the "used life" or accumulated depreciation of the replaced facilities and for the salvage value of any material or parts salvaged and retained or sold by OWNER. Not more frequently than once a month, but at least quarterly, OWNER will prepare and submit itemized progress bills for costs incurred not to exceed OWNER's recorded costs as of the billing date less estimated credits applicable to completed work. Payment of progress 141 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW 13-5 tREV 6/20 1 ()) Page 3 of 6 (RCTC AGREEMENT NO: 16-31-70.00) bills not to exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made under the terms of this Agreement. Payment of progress bills which exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made after receipt and approval by RCTC of documentation supporting the cost increase and after an Amendment to this Agreement has been executed by the parties to this Agreement. The OWNER shall submit a final bill to RCTC within 360 days after the completion of the work described in Section I above. If RCTC has not received a final bill within 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER's work described in Section I of this Agreement, and RCTC has delivered to OWNER fully executed Director's Deeds, Consents to Common Use or Joint Use Agreements, if required for OWNER's facilities, RCTC will provide written notification to OWNER of its intent to close its file within 30 days and OWNER hereby acknowledges, to the extent allowed by law, that all remaining costs will be deemed to have been abandoned. If RCTC processes a final bill for payment more than 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER's work, payment of the late bill may be subject to allocation and/or approval by ROTC. The final billing shall be in the form of an itemized statement of the total costs charged to the project, less the credits provided for in this Agreement, and less any amounts covered by progress billings. However, RCTC shall not pay final bills which exceed the estimated cost of this Agreement without documentation of the reason for the increase of said cost from the OWNER and approval of documentation by RCTC. Except, if the final bill exceeds the OWNER's estimated costs solely as the result of a revised Notice to Owner as provided for in Section I, a copy of said revised Notice to Owner shall suffice as documentation. In either case, payment of the amount over the estimated cost of this Agreement may be subject to allocation and/or approval by RCTC. In any event if the final bill exceeds 125% of the estimated cost of this Agreement, an Amended Agreement shall be executed by the parties to this Agreement prior to the payment of the OWNER'S final bill. Any and all increases in costs that are the direct result of deviations from the work described in Section I of this Agreement, shall have the prior concurrence of RCTC. Detailed records from which the billing is compiled shall be retained by OWNER for a period of three years from the date of the final payment and will be available for audit by RCTC, State and/or Federal auditors. In performing work under this Agreement, OWNER agrees to comply with the Uniform System of Accounts for Public Utilities found at 18 CFR Part 101, 201, et al., and, to the extent they are applicable to OWNER doing work on the project that is the subject of this Agreement, the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures as set forth in 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645, and 2 CFR Part 200 et al. If a subsequent RCTC, State and/or Federal audit determines payments to be unallowable, OWNER agrees to reimburse RCTC upon receipt of RCTC's billing. If OWNER is subject to repayment due to failure by RCTC to comply with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances then RCTC will ensure that OWNER is compensated for actual cost in performing work under this agreement, OWNER, at the present time, does not have sufficient funds available to proceed with the relocation of OWNER's facilities provided for herein. It is estimated that the cost of the work provided for by this Agreement and, as hereinafter set forth, is the sum of $470,175. RCTC agrees to advance to OWNER the sum of $300,000 to apply to the cost of the work to be 142 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW I3-5 (REV 6/20191 Page h of G (RCTC AGREEMENT NO: 16.31.70»00) undertaken as provided hereinabove. Said sum of $300,000 will be deposited by RCTC with OWNER within 45 days after execution of the Agreement by the parties hereto and upon receipt of an OWNER's bill for the advance. It is further agreed that upon receipt of the monies agreed upon to be advanced by RCTC herein, OWNER will deposit said monies in a separate interest -bearing account or trust fund in state or national banks in California having the legal custody of said monies in accordance with and subject to the applicable provisions of Section 53630, et seq., of the Government Code; and all interest earned by said monies advanced by RCTC shall be remitted to RCTC quarterly, via a separate check, even when the cost of relocation exceeds the advance amount. When the work is completed, OWNER shall send RCTC a Final Bill for reconciliation of the advance. In the event actual and necessary relocation costs as established herein are less than the sum of money advanced by RCTC to OWNER, OWNER hereby agrees to refund to RCTC the difference between said actual and necessary cost and the sum of money that was advanced. The remittance check for the balance of advanced funds will be separate from the remittance check for the earned interest. In the event that the actual and necessary cost of relocation exceeds the amount of money advanced to OWNER, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, RCTC will reimburse OWNER said excess costs upon receipt of an itemized bill as set forth herein. V. GENERAL CONDITIONS All costs accrued by OWNER as a result of RCTC's request of September 4, 2013 to review, study and/or prepare relocation plans and estimates for the project associated with this Agreement may be billed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If RCTC's project which precipitated this Agreement is canceled or modified so as to eliminate the necessity of work by OWNER, RCTC will notify OWNER in writing and RCTC reserves the right to terminate this Agreement by Amendment. The Amendment shall provide mutually acceptable terms and conditions for terminating the Agreement. OWNER shall submit a Notice of Completion to RCTC within 30 days of the completion of the work described herein. It is understood that said highway is a Federal aid highway and accordingly, 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645 is hereby incorporated into this Agreement. In addition, the provisions of 23 CFR 635.410, Buy America, are also incorporated into this agreement. The Buy America requirements are further specified in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21), section 1518; 23 CFR 635.410 requires that all manufacturing processes have occurred in the United States for steel and iron products (including the application of coatings) installed on a project receiving funding from the FHWA. OWNER understands and acknowledges that this project is subject to the requirements of the Buy America law (23 U.S.C., Section 313) and applicable regulations, including 23 CFR 635.410 and FHWA guidance, OWNER hereby certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, for products where Buy America requirements apply, it shall use only such products for which it has received a certification from its supplier, or provider of construction 143 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW 13-5 (REV 6/2010) Page 5 of 6 (RCTC AGREEMENT NO: 16-31-70-00) services that procures the product certifying Buy America compliance. This does not include products for which waivers have been granted under 23 CFR 635.410 or other applicable provisions or excluded material cited in the Department's guidelines for the implementation of Buy America requirements for utility relocations issued on December 3, 2013. THE ESTIMATED COST TO RCTC FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WORK IS $588,825. 144 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RN/ 13-5 (REV 6/2010) Page G of G (RCTC AGREEMENT NO: 16-31-70-00) SIGNATURE PAGE TO UTILITY AGREEMENT NUMBER 23279 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this Agreement the day and year above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION OWNER: COMMISSION City of Corona By By ANNE MAYER Date Name Date Title Executive Director APPROVAL A FORM: BEST, BE . ' EGER LLP By Cou del Ve2'6(6 APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: By 4111jOkir* 11/24 Nicole Deluca Date Utility Coordinator Parsons 145 AGENDA ITEM 81 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Annual Funding Memorandums of Understanding with Southern California Regional Rail Authority WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 16-25-106-00 with the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) for the Commission's funding commitment related to the Fiscal Year 2016/17 SCRRA budget for a total amount not to exceed $19, 524, 000; 2) Approve MOU No. 16-25-107-00 with SCRRA for reimbursement of security guard services at Riverside County layover facilities for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $250,000 for FY 2016/17; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to approve the final form and execute the MOUs; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute amendments to MOU No. 16-25-107-00 related to revised compensation amounts in subsequent years. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the June 8, 2016 meeting, the Commission approved the Riverside County FY 2016/17 SCRRA subsidy of $17,305,000 for operations and $1,928,000 for capital projects. A recent action by the SCRRA Board of Directors to approve a fare reduction option shifted additional revenue subsidy costs to all member agencies. Therefore, the Commission's operating subsidy increased by $40,000 for a revised subsidy amount not to exceed $17,345,000. This minor increase does not require a Commission budget adjustment since the Commission will apply an $800,000 credit related to the Commission's share of the FY 2013/14 operating surplus, as determined by the member agency subsidy reconciliation, toward the Commission's FY 2016/17 operating subsidy payment. Agenda Item 81 146 SCRRA is a subrecipient of the Commission's Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grant funds, requiring additional oversight and monitoring by the Commission. As a result of the most recent federal triennial review, the Commission has entered into an MOU to define the respective responsibilities of the Commission and SCRRA regarding the federal funds in addition to the Commission's annual financial commitments to SCRRA. MOU No. 16-25-106-00 clearly describes the responsibilities and expectations of each party as it relates to funding and performance. This MOU also includes an additional $250,000 of marketing funds for the continued focused collaboration for the new 91/Perris Valley Line (PVL) outreach. The additional marketing funds are included for this use in the Commission's FY 2016/17 Budget related to the Rail Department. This MOU defines the expectations, responsibilities, and financial obligations between the parties. In addition, the Commission provides security guard services for its nine Metrolink stations, which include 24-hour guard service at both the Riverside -Downtown and Perris -South Station layover facilities, which Metrolink uses to store locomotives and train sets overnight. An MOU established in 2012 between Commission and SCRRA in which SCRRA agreed to reimburse the Commission for providing security guard services at the Riverside -Downtown Station layover facility expires on June 30, 2016. With the commencement of the 91/PVL service on June 6, the Commission requires a new MOU to continue security guard services at the Riverside -Downtown and the new Perris -South Station layover facilities. Costs to be reimbursed include a prorated share of unarmed security guards for 8 hours per day Monday through Friday and 24 hours per day on weekends at the Riverside -Downtown Station and 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at Perris -South Station in an amount not to exceed $250,000 for FY 2016/17. MOU No. 16-25-107-00 will expire on June 30, 2019 but will automatically renew for two additional one-year terms unless either the Commission or SCRRA provides at least a 30-day written notice of non -renewal in advance of each additional expiration date. Funding for security guard service reimbursements to the Commission is available in the SCRRA's FY 2016/17 operating budget and will be requested in its future annual budgets. The attached MOU drafts are being reviewed by SCRRA and will require Board of Directors approval. Staff recommends the Commission approve the draft MOUs with SCRRA related to the FY 2016/17 operating/capital subsidies and marketing efforts as well as security guard reimbursements. Revised drafts will be presented at the July Commission meeting. Additionally, staff recommends the Commission authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the final MOUs and subsequent year amendments regarding additional security guard reimbursement amounts. Agenda Item 81 147 Financial Information $ 17,595,000 Operating In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $ 1,929,000 Capital Local Transportation Fund funds, Cap and Trade Low Carbon Transit Operating Source of Funds: Program, and FTA Section 5309 and 5337 funds Budget Adjustment: No 254199 86101 103 25 86101 $ 17,345,000 GL/Project Accounting No.: 034198 73704 103 25 73704 $ 250,000 004017 86102 265 33 86102 $ 1,929,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \Pe4,4,0,1i it Date: 06/24/2016 Attachments: 1) Memorandum of Understanding No. 16-25-106-00 2) Memorandum of Understanding No. 16-25-107-00 Agenda Item 81 148 ATTACHMENT 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. 16-25-106-00 BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-17 ANNUAL FUNDING MOU This memorandum of understanding (MOU) is effective as of this _ day of _ 2016, by and between the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (hereinafter referred to as "SCRRA"), One Gateway Plaza 12th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90012, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, California 92501, a public agency (hereinafter referred to as "RCTC"), which are sometimes individually referred to as "PARTY", and collectively referred to as "PARTIES". I. RECITALS A. RCTC and SCRRA desire to enter into a MOU to define RCTC's financial commitments to the SCRRA fiscal year (FY) 2016-17 operating budget and rehabilitation/renovation and new capital budget (collectively, the "BUDGET"). B. RCTC and SCRRA desire to enter into this MOU to define the respective responsibilities of SCRRA as a subrecipient of RCTC federal funds for costs in connection with the rehabilitation/renovation new and capital budget, and SCRRA's prior year rehabilitation/renovation and new capital costs. C. SCRRA provides commuter rail service operating to, within, or through Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, San Diego and Orange Counties. D. RCTC funds SCRRA commuter rail services benefitting Riverside County on the Riverside Line, Inland Empire -Orange County Line, and 91/PVL consistent with the existing cost sharing formula established by the Joint Powers Agreement forming SCRRA ("JPA"), RCTC Agreement No. M-23-008, to which RCTC is a party. E. SCRRA's operating budget covers train operations, including operating crews, dispatching, equipment maintenance, fuel, non-scheduled rolling stock repairs, operating facilities maintenance, rolling stock lease payments, security and guard services, public safety programs, passenger relations, ticket vending machine (TVM) maintenance and revenue collection, marketing and market research, media/external relations, utilities and leases, passenger transfers to other operators, Rail 2 Rail program, station 149 maintenance, freight rail agreements and general administrative costs that support SCRRA operations (EXHIBIT A- SCRRA Budget). F. RCTC, at its June 8, 2016 meeting, approved RCTC's financial commitments to the SCRRA FY 2016-17 for operating costs as required by the JPA. G. SCRRA's capital budget includes the following rehabilitation/renovation and new capital projects: track, structure, and signal work; layover facility work at Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station; and RCTC's share of system -wide track, signal, information technology, communications, rubber tire vehicles, TVM, and mechanical improvements. H. RCTC, at its June 8, 2016 meeting, approved RCTC's financial commitments to the SCRRA FY 2016-17 rehabilitation/renovation and new capital projects with funds to be drawn down by RCTC from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and used to reimburse SCRRA. I. RCTC, in previous Commission meetings, has approved RCTC's financial commitment to prior SCRRA rehabilitation/renovation and new capital projects. Certain projects have not been completed and funds for those carryover projects, as presented in Exhibit A, will be drawn down by RCTC from FTA and used to reimburse SCRRA. J. SCRRA agrees to provide weed abatement, debris removal, track maintenance, graffiti removal, and other related maintenance, as well as routine maintenance, inspection and repairs of track, structures, signal system, grade crossing warning system and communication infrastructure (collectively, "Maintenance of Way Services") for all operational tracks along the San Jacinto Subdivision. K. Pursuant to the Shared Use Agreement between RCTC and BNSF Railway (BNSF), BNSF is obligated to pay a set rate per mile for trains that are operated and dispatched over the PVL ("BNSF Per Mile Payment Obligation"). L. SCRRA will also maintain the freight -only double track, sidings and spurs between Highgrove Junction to the end of the PVL operating segment ("Freight Only Maintenance of Way Services"), provided that the costs for such maintenance are not an RCTC obligation, and shall instead be reimbursed by BNSF pursuant to the BNSF Per Mile Payment Obligation. SCRRA shall invoice BNSF for such costs. RCTC shall work with SCRRA to ensure that SCRRA is reimbursed by BNSF. II. Scope of MOU This MOU specifies the terms and conditions, roles and responsibilities of the PARTIES as they pertain to the subjects and projects addressed herein. Both RCTC and SCRRA agree that each will cooperate and coordinate with the other in all Page 2 of 18 150 activities covered by this MOU and any other supplemental MOUs that may be required to facilitate the purposes thereof. III. Responsibilities of RCTC RCTC agrees to the following responsibilities for the BUDGET: A. Allocate and pay to SCRRA the RCTC share of the BUDGET for operating costs in the not -to exceed amount of Seventeen Million Three Hundred Forty -Four Thousand Five Hundred Eleven Dollars ($17,344,511) for rail operations using state and local funds, which will be invoiced to RCTC on a quarterly basis in advance by SCRRA. B. Allocate and pay SCRRA for additional marketing support for the 91/Perris Valley Line (91/PVL) in the not -to exceed amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) for Metrolink marketing expenses related to the launch of 91/PVL service. C. Program One Million Seven Hundred Eighty -Four Thousand Three Hundred Ninety Dollars ($1,784,390) in FTA Section 5309 funds as a subaward under FTA Grant No. CA-05-0268 ($589,432) and CA-05-0283 ($1,194,958) to be drawn down directly by RCTC to reimburse SCRRA as a subrecipient for rehabilitation and renovation projects on the River subdivision, as well as, RCTC's share of systemwide capital projects as listed in Exhibit A. RCTC shall review each invoice and pay all authorized expenses within 30 days following approval of an invoice that is properly submitted in accordance with this MOU. D. Program One Hundred Forty -Four Thousand Dollars ($144,000) in FTA Section 5309 funds as a subaward under FTA Grant No. CA-05-0283 to be drawn down directly by RCTC to reimburse SCRRA for RCTC-approved new capital projects as listed in Exhibit A. RCTC shall review each invoice and pay all authorized expenses within 30 days following approval of an invoice that is properly submitted in accordance with this MOU. E. Review each SCRRA invoice for rehabilitation/renovation, and RCTC- approved new capital project costs to ensure eligibility for federal reimbursement and make timely drawdown requests to FTA for eligible expenses following approval of the invoice. F. Prepare and submit to the FTA, on a timely basis, all required periodic reports and milestone updates. G. Comply with all requirements of the FTA Master Agreement, found at http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/21-Master.pdf ("Master Agreement"). Page 3 of 18 151 H. Monitor SCRRA's respective responsibilities as a subrecipient of RCTC's federal funds for rehabilitation/renovation and new capital costs in connection with the BUDGET and with SCRRA's prior years' carryover budget. I. Per the regular operating formula, as set forth in the JPA, reimburse SCRRA for Maintenance of Way Services performed within twenty (20) feet from the center line along PVL, including any railroad structure or ballast cross- section that is located outside of this twenty (20) feet area (collectively, the "PVL SCRRA Maintenance Area"). These costs shall be included in the quarterly rail operations invoices submitted by SCRRA pursuant to Section III.A and are part of the BUDGET allocated not -to -exceed amount set forth therein as listed in Exhibit A. J. For the PVL, be responsible for applicable Maintenance of Way Services that are outside the PVL SCRRA Maintenance Area. RCTC shall not be required to provide flagmen for such Maintenance of Way Services, but shall properly ensure that contractors have safety training for employees. K. Provide security guards for the layover facilities at South Perris and Riverside Downtown stations, which costs shall be reimbursed by SCRRA. SCRRA's payment obligation shall be based on the agreed upon terms in Funding Agreement No. 16-25-107-00. RCTC shall invoice SCRRA on a quarterly basis for the direct security and management costs associated with the security of the layover facilities. L. Require, under its contract(s) for security guard services, that the contractor(s) indemnify SCRRA to the same extent as indemnification is provided to RCTC, and include SCRRA as an additional insured under all applicable policies required by RCTC under the contract(s). M. Make available to SCRRA as part of this MOU station security camera feeds for SCRRA's safety and security needs. However, this MOU does not cover any additional connections requested by SCRRA. Future connections shall be agreed to in writing by the PARTIES, and funding for any costs associated therewith will need to be identified. IV. Obligations of SCRRA SCRRA agrees to the following responsibilities for the BUDGET: A. Establish fiscal controls and accounting procedures sufficient to assure proper accounting for all transactions, so that audits may be performed. SCRRA shall use accounting and fiscal procedures conforming to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Page 4 of 18 152 B. Comply with the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), including but not limited to: a. Indirect Cost Rate. SCRRA's provisional federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between SCRRA and the FTA to be applied to FY 2016-17 is: New Capital 190.41% Rehabilitation 387.37% Equipment 408.52% Third Party Agreements 203.00% i. Once the final rates are approved by FTA, within 30 days of approval of the final rates, SCRRA must reconcile its billings for any over or under -recovery of indirect costs previously billed to and reimbursed by RCTC using the provisional rates. Interest may not be claimed on any potential underpayments. C. Comply with the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26, et. seq., and all other FTA Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) rules, regulations and policies in carrying out this MOU, and shall_implement a stand-alone DBE Program that includes goal setting, outreach, monitoring, and reporting. SCRRA shall create and maintain records of compliance with the DBE obligations in this MOU, and provide compliance information to RCTC upon request. D. Comply with all applicable sections of FTA Circular 5010.1d pertaining to the management of federally funded assets, FTA Circular 4220.1F pertaining to any third party contracts funded with FTA funds, and any other applicable FTA Circulars. SCRRA shall provide all necessary information to RCTC so that RCTC can coordinate with the FTA regarding the requirements in Circular 5010.1d. E. Assume the role of subrecipient of federal awards and provide RCTC with all the necessary information to remain in compliance as a subrecipient with the Uniform Guidance, FTA requirements, and RCTC Subrecipient Guidelines, all of which are on file at the offices of the PARTIES, and are incorporated herein by reference. F. Comply with all applicable requirements of the FTA Master Agreement, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference, and be responsible for any violation of FTA rules, regulations or policies, or misuse of funds by SCRRA. G. Submit a separate invoice to RCTC (Attention: Accounts Payable) on a quarterly basis for RCTC's share of the costs associated with the individual Page 5 of 18 153 components of the BUDGET. Each invoice shall be in a mutually acceptable form and shall include the following information, at a minimum: a. RCTC Agreement No.16-25-106-00 b. Time period covered by the invoice; c. Total invoice amount; d. For rehabilitation/renovation and new capital projects, supporting documentation, such as executed contracts, contractor invoices, or other records to indicate payment has been made to contractor(s), or that payment is imminent in the amount of the invoice, and such additional supporting documentation and background information as RCTC may reasonably require (including progress reports, as further described below): e. All information needed for quarterly project reporting and milestone updates to allow RCTC enough time to prepare and submit to the FTA on a timely basis all required or requested FTA reports and updates. In no event shall such reports be received later than ten (10) days prior to the required date of the quarterly submission to the FTA, which is 30 days following the end of each quarter. H. For each invoice submitted to RCTC related to capital projects, provide a progress report, which shall include a description of services performed during invoice period and any significant issues encountered or anticipated; for rehabilitation/renovation and new capital projects, progress report shall include breakdown of percent completed/remaining for projects included in invoice; I. For rehabilitation/renovation and capital projects, provide quarterly reports detailing total amount invoiced to date and balance remaining on projects; J. Provide quarterly budget to actual reports to RCTC and the SCRRA Board of Directors reflecting actual ridership and revenues and expenses at a line item level compared to the adopted operating budget, based on financial information generated by SCRRA's Oracle financial system. Such financial information shall be based on a monthly financial closing process that includes significant accruals and material account reconciliations. a. SCRRA shall also provide reports to RCTC on a quarterly basis for any budgetary transfers fiscal year to date. K. Operate Metrolink commuter rail service on three lines serving Riverside County within budgeted service levels as outlined in Exhibit A. L. Submit invoices to RCTC in a timely manner to allow RCTC to draw down Section 5309 federal funds directly and provide quarterly expenditure reports to RCTC no later than the 20th of the month following the end of each quarter reflecting anticipated drawdown of federal funds and funds Page 6 of 18 154 expended for RCTC-funded rehabilitation/renovation projects, including a progress report on each budgeted rehabilitation/renovation project that includes status of each project, schedule update, anticipated cash flow and drawdowns, and expenditures to budget. M. Provide a reconciliation report to RCTC by March 31, 2018, identifying a surplus or deficit in FY 2016-17 RCTC allocations to the SCRRA for operating expenses. N. Obtain express written permission by July 31, 2018 from RCTC prior to reallocating any unexpended FY 2016-17 RCTC operating funds. O. Provide quarterly reports to RCTC that include updates on Exhibit A, summarizing FY 2016-17 actual data versus budget, to assist in the measurement of performance metrics. P. As applicable, prepare and submit all required reports to federal and state agencies in a timely manner by the due dates established by those agencies in order to avoid any penalties that could impair funding to RCTC. Q. To qualify for reimbursement from RCTC, submit (i) a final invoice for operating expenses for FY 2016-17 on or prior to June 30, 2017 for budgeted or adjusted budget operating expenses and a final invoice after reconciliation of operating expenses by March 31, 2018, and (ii) final invoices for rehabilitation/renovation and new capital projects within four years of initial authorization of the relevant project, in accordance with FTA Circular 5010.1d. Should a rehabilitation/renovation or capital project incur a delay, SCRRA shall promptly notify RCTC as to the cause of delay and other pertinent information that may be required to obtain an extension of grant terms, as applicable. Invoices submitted beyond the stated timeframes, unless extended, will be reviewed and may be reimbursed, on a case by case basis, subject to the availability of funding, as determined by RCTC and its grantors. R. Submit invoices to BNSF for dispatching along the PVL and for the Freight Only Maintenance of Way Services. If the annual BNSF Per Mile Payment Obligation exceeds the costs of the Freight Only Maintenance of Way Services, SCRRA shall also invoice BNSF for a portion of the Maintenance of Way Services within the PVL SCRRA Maintenance Area. S. Provide Maintenance of Way Services within the PVL SCRRA Maintenance Area. T. Be responsible for all the fencing maintenance, weeding, trash, graffiti and maintenance within SCRRA's responsibility for track and structures. U. Reimburse RCTC on a quarterly basis for the direct security costs associated with the security of the layover facility located at the Riverside Downtown Page 7 of 18 155 station and the South Perris Station along the PVL, for a total, not -to -exceed amount of $250,000. V. Make available to RCTC as part of this MOU security camera feeds for RCTC's safety and security needs. Future connections will need to be agreed to in writing by the PARTIES and funding for any costs associated with the project will need to be identified. W. Maintain the 48 fibers provided by RCTC for SCRRA's use. X. Be responsible for the maintenance of eight (8) TVMs which shall be equally divided among the four (4) new Metrolink stations: Riverside Hunter Park, Moreno Valley/March Field, Downtown Perris and South Perris. Removal of any TVM from the designated station will require written notification to and approval from RCTC prior to work commencing. Y. Report on and credit to RCTC's quarterly member agency operating subsidy allocation any revenues received from BNSF for the Freight Only Maintenance of Way Services and any additional Maintenance of Way Services along the PVL on a quarterly basis. Those revenues will be used to offset RCTC's member agency operating subsidy allocation and reported on quarterly invoices. Z. Report on and credit to RCTC's quarterly member agency operating subsidy allocation any revenues received from BNSF for the dispatching along the PVL. AA.Be responsible for the maintenance of the Riverside Downtown and South Perris layover facilities, unless different agreements are made in writing by both PARTIES. BB. Notify RCTC in writing within five (5) business days of the commencement of a federal or state agency review or audit, provide draft and final copies of the related reports within ten (10) business days of receipt from such agency, and provide copies of any SCRRA responses to required corrective actions. SCRRA shall update RCTC on the status of required actions on a quarterly basis until such corrective actions have been completed to the satisfaction of the federal or state agency. CC. Complete all responsibilities of SCRRA which are subject to RCTC reimbursement, as set forth in this MOU, within the total not -to -exceed amounts as set forth in Article III, and Article V of this MOU. DD. Provide written notification to RCTC regarding a proposed change in any rehabilitation/renovation and/or capital project, including, a scope of work, schedule and budget, and obtain RCTC approval prior to implementing changes to or commencing a new project with funds outlined in this MOU. EE. Complete all work to be funded under this MOU in a good and workmanlike manner, consistent with the standard of care generally recognized as being Page 8 of 18 156 employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California, and to the satisfaction of RCTC. Failure of SCRRA to abide by the conditions above may result in delay to payment schedule outlined in Responsibilities of RCTC. V. Maximum Obligation Notwithstanding any provisions of this MOU to the contrary, RCTC and SCRRA agree that RCTC's maximum cumulative payment obligation hereunder shall be Seventeen Million Three Hundred Forty -Four Thousand Five Hundred Eleven Dollars($17,344,511) for rail operations; Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) for additional Marketing Support related to the 91/PVL launch, One Million Seven Hundred Eighty -Four Thousand Three Hundred Ninety Dollars ($1,784,390) for rehabilitation and renovation projects; and One Thousand Forty - Four Hundred ($144,000) for new capital projects, for a total amount not to exceed Nineteen Million Five Hundred Twenty -Two Thousand Nine Hundred One Dollars ($19,522,904 Any amendments to the BUDGET that increase the amount set forth as due from RCTC will require RCTC board approval. VI. Complete MOU A. This MOU, including any attachments incorporated herein and made applicable by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the term(s) and condition(s) between SCRRA and RCTC concerning the subject matter addressed herein and it supersedes all prior representations, understandings, and communications. The invalidity in whole or in part of any term or condition of this MOU shall not affect the validity of other term(s) or conditions(s) of this MOU. The above -referenced Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein. B. RCTC'S failure to insist on any instance(s) of SCRRA's performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this MOU shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of RCTC's right to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and SCRRA's obligation in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect. Changes to any portion of this MOU shall not be binding upon RCTC except when specifically confirmed in writing by an authorized representative of RCTC by way of a written amendment to this MOU and issued in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. Page 9 of 18 157 C. SCRRA's failure to insist on any instance(s) of RCTC's performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this MOU shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of SCRRA's right to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and RCTC's obligation in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect. Changes to any portion of this MOU shall not be binding upon SCRRA except when specifically confirmed in writing by an authorized representative of SCRRA by way of a written amendment to this MOU and issued in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. VII. Authorized Representatives The actions required to be taken by SCRRA and RCTC in the implementation of this MOU are delegated to the respective authorized representative of each PARTY. The authorized representative for SCRRA is its Chief Executive Officer, or designee, and the authorized representative for RCTC is its Executive Director, or designee. VIII. Audit and Inspection In its role as a subrecipient, SCRRA shall: A. Maintain a complete set of accounting records in accordance with GAAP for RCTC subrecipient monitoring, FTA, and normal operations purposes. The original records shall be maintained within the SCRRA limits. B. Prepare and file, within nine (9) months after the close of the fiscal year, financial statements of SCRRA for such fiscal year, together with an audit report thereon prepared by and independent certified public accountant. SCRRA shall furnish such audited financial statements to RCTC within ten (10) days of issuance of the audit report. C. Upon reasonable notice, permit the authorized representatives of RCTC and FTA to inspect and audit all work, materials, payroll, books, accounts and other data and records of SCRRA for a period of not less than three (3) years after final payment, or until any on -going audit is completed whichever is longer. For purposes of audit, the date of completion of this MOU shall be the date of RCTC's payment of SCRRA's final billing (so noted on the invoice) under this MOU. a. Upon conclusion of RCTC's monitoring of SCRRA as a subrecipient under this MOU, RCTC shall prepare a notice to SCRRA of any findings or deficiencies and immediate actions to be taken by SCRRA to correct issues involving ineligible uses of federal funds. Page 10 of 18 158 i. SCRRA shall develop a corrective action plan for any findings or deficiencies within 60 days from the issuance of the review findings to address deficiencies or noncompliance issues. D. With respect to audits in accordance with (C), include these same requirements in construction contracts with SCRRA's contractor(s). E. Comply with the terms and conditions for closeout of subawards. RCTC shall have the right to reproduce any such books, records, and accounts. If the FTA determines that any FTA funds were not spent in accordance with applicable federal rules and regulations, SCRRA shall be responsible for reimbursement of all such improperly expended funds and shall make such reimbursement in the manner specified by FTA. If SCRRA fails to comply with the requirements of this MOU as it pertains to federal requirements as a subrecipient, RCTC may impose additional conditions or take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate: A. Temporarily withhold cash payments; B. Disallow all or part of cost of the activity that is not in compliance; C. Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the federal award; D. Recommend that the federal agency initiate suspension or debarment proceedings; or E. Take other remedies that may be legally available. IX. Indemnification and Insurance A. SCRRA shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless RCTC, its officers, directors, employees and agents from and against any and all claims (including attorney's fees and reasonable expenses for litigation or settlement) for any loss or damages, bodily injuries, including death, worker's compensation subrogation claims, damage to or loss of use of property alleged to be caused by the acts, omissions or willful misconduct by SCRRA, its officers, directors, employees, contractors, or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this MOU. B. RCTC shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless SCRRA, its officers, directors, employees and agents from and against any and all claims (including attorney's fees and reasonable expenses for litigation or settlement) for any loss or damages, bodily injuries, including death, worker's compensation subrogation claims, damage to or loss of use of Page 11 of 18 159 property alleged to be caused by the acts, omissions or willful misconduct by RCTC, its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this MOU. C. The indemnification and defense obligations of this MOU shall survive its expiration or termination. D. SCRRA maintains property and general liability insurance and/or self- insurance in the amounts and with coverage as set forth in the insurance certificates attached hereto as Exhibit "B". SCRRA shall maintain, for the duration of this MOU, and/or shall require that SCRRA contractors maintain, levels of insurance coverage equivalent to existing coverage, as shown in the attached certificates, against claims for injuries to persons, or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with SCRRA rail operations or construction by SCRRA, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors on RCTC property. Further, the PARTIES agree that SCRRA is responsible for maintenance and repair of damage to, regardless of cause or ownership, all assets that facilitate SCRRA's operations, and shall provide insurance therefore. E. SCRRA shall include RCTC as an additional insured on all insurance policies required to be maintained hereunder. X. Additional Provisions RCTC and SCRRA agree to the following mutual responsibilities: A. Term of MOU: This MOU shall terminate upon the completion of the disbursement of the operating and capital funds to SCRRA and the completion of all reports, updates or any other documentation or responsibility of the PARTIES related to the projects in the BUDGET. In all events, this MOU shall terminate within the time limits set forth in applicable FTA procedures and regulations, but in no event later than three (3) years from the date of the Agreement's execution date. This MOU may only be extended upon written mutual consent by both PARTIES. B. Dispute Resolution: In the case of a dispute, the Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of the PARTIES shall timely attempt to resolve the dispute. If the PARTIES are unable to resolve the dispute, either PARTY may elect to initiate arbitration by a panel of three arbitrators pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The panel of arbitrators shall consist of one arbitrator appointed by the governing body of each of the PARTIES, and Page 12 of 18 160 the third member shall be appointed by mutual consent of the other two arbitrators. C. Modifications: This MOU may be amended in writing at any time by the mutual consent of both PARTIES. No amendment shall have any force or effect unless executed in writing by both PARTIES. D. Laws and Regulations: RCTC and SCRRA shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statues, ordinances and regulations of any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the BUDGET. E. Legal Authority: The persons signing below represent that they are authorized to execute this MOU on behalf of their respective PARTY, and that, by so executing this MOU, the PARTIES hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this MOU. F. Severability: If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this MOU is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this MOU shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision, covenant or condition of this MOU shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. G. Counterparts: This MOU may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same MOU. Facsimile signatures will be permitted. H. Force Majeure: Either PARTY shall be excused from performing its obligations under this MOU during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause beyond its control, including but not limited to: any incidence of fire or flood; acts of God; commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by the federal, state or local government; national fuel shortage; or a material act or omission by the other PARTY; when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other PARTY, and provided further that such nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the PARTY not performing. I. Assignment: Neither this MOU, nor any of the PARTIES rights, obligations, duties, or authority hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part by either PARTY without the prior written consent of the other PARTY in its sole and absolute discretion. Any such attempt of assignment shall be deemed void and of no force and effect. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed consent to any subsequent assignment, nor the waiver of any right to consent to such subsequent assignment. J. Obligations To Comply with Law: Nothing herein shall be deemed nor construed to authorize or require any PARTY to issue bonds, notes or other Page 13 of 18 161 evidences of indebtedness under the terms, in amounts, or for purposes other than as authorized by local, state or federal law. K. Governing Law: The laws of the State of California and applicable local and federal laws, regulations and guidelines shall govern this MOU. Venue shall be in Riverside County. L. Arbitration Fees: Should arbitration arise out of this MOU for the performance hereof, the arbitration fees, and other costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, shall be paid by the PARTY against whose favor the arbitration, or any subsequent legal action arising out of the arbitration, is found. M. Notices: Any notices, requests, or demands made between the PARTIES pursuant to this MOU are to be directed as follows: To SCRRA: To RCTC: Southern California Regional Rail Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission One Gateway Plaza 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Street Address: 4080 Lemon St 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 Attention: Art Leahy Chief Executive Officer Tel: 213-452-0255 E-mai1:SCRRACE0@scrra.net Attention: Anne Mayer Executive Director Tel: 951-787-7141 E-mail: amayer@rctc.org N. Successors and Assigns: The provisions of this MOU shall bind and inure to the benefit of each of the PARTIES hereto, and all successors or assigns of the PARTIES hereto. O. Survival: All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this MOU, including, but not limited to, the indemnification, reporting, auditing, repayment of improperly expended funds, and records maintenance obligations, shall survive any such expiration or termination. Page 14 of 18 162 This MOU shall be made effective upon execution by both PARTIES. [Signatures on following page] Page 15 of 18 163 SIGNATURE PAGE TO MOU No. 16-25-106-00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused this MOU No. 16-25-106-00 to be executed on the date first above written. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY COMMISSION Chief Executive Officer Executive Director Reviewed and Approved as to Form: SCRRA Legal Counsel RCTC General Legal Counsel Page 16 of 18 164 EXHIBIT A-SCRRA BUDGET RCTC's shares of SCRRA's FY 2016-2017 Budget, as approved by the SCRRA Board of Directors in June 2016, are shown below: Operating Budget: Expenses $ 25,778,000 Revenues 8,473,000 Net Subsidy $ 17,344,511 Additional Marketing Support for 91/PVL RCTC Share $ 250,000 Rehabilitation/Renovation New Authority Budget: RCTC Share $ 1,284,390 Rotem Settlement 500,000 Total $ 1,784,374 New Capital Authority Budget: Project Studies $ 144,000 Page 17 of 18 165 EXHIBIT B-INSURANCE CERTIFICATES [attached behind this page] Page 18 of 18 166 ATTACHMENT 2 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING No.16-25-107-00 BETWEEN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FOR SECURITY GUARD SERVICES FOR LAYOVER FACILITY THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is made and entered into this , 2016 ("Effective Date") by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("RCTC"), and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority ("SCRRA"), a joint powers authority. RECITALS: WHEREAS, the parties desire to establish a Memorandum of Understanding where SCRRA agrees to provide payment for security guard services related to equipment layover needs at the Riverside Downtown and Perris South Metrolink Stations and layover facilities. ,. NOW THEREFORE, the RCTC and SCRRA agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. COMPLETE AGREEMENT This MOU, including any exhibits and documents incorporated herein and made applicable by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions of the MOU between SCRRA and RCTC and supersedes all prior representations, understandings, and communications between the parties. The above -referenced Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein. ARTICLE 2. TERM This MOU shall commence on July 1, 2016 and expire on June 30, 2019 except that it shall renew automatically from year to year for two (2) additional one (1) year terms unless one of the parties provides at least thirty (30) days written notice of non -renewal in advance of each additional 17336.00603\29036184.1 Page 1 of 7 167 Memorandum of Understanding No. MU125-12 July 1 expiration date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this MOU may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. ARTICLE 3. IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED: All parties agree to the following responsibilities regarding the MOU: A. SCRRA will pay to RCTC the hourly rate for the applicable year, as shown in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference, for all security guard services identified in Exhibit "A" (Services). Payments will be made to RCTC within thirty (30) days of receipt and approval of RCTC's invoice and supporting documentation by SCRRA. Exhibit "A" provides the rates and not to exceed compensation to be paid by SCRRA for the first year of the term of this MOU. Prior to July 1 of each subsequent year, RCTC and SCRRA shall amend Exhibit "A" to include the then -current rates and not to exceed compensation to be paid by SCRRA. RCTC shall have the right to suspend performance of the Services if an amendment to Exhibit "A" is not executed prior to such date. B. RCTC shall submit quarterly invoices to SCRRA for reimbursement for services. Invoices shall specify the period covered, and the agreed reimbursement rate specified in attached Exhibits. Invoices shall be submitted to: Accounts Payable Southern California Regional Rail SCRRA One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 C. Complete and accurate invoices submitted on a quarterly basis shall be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice. D. (a) RCTC agrees to indemnify and hold SCRRA, harmless from and against all losses, damages, actions and expenses (including attorneys' fees) on account of bodily injury to or death of any person or damage to or loss of use of property incident to or arising from any negligence or willful misconduct of RCTC under the terms of this MOU. 17336.00603\29036184.1 Page 2of7 168 Memorandum of Understanding No. MU125-12 (b) SCRRA agrees to indemnify and hold RCTC harmless from and against all losses, damages, actions and expenses (including attorney's fees) on account of bodily injury to or death of any person or damage to or loss of use of property incident to or arising from any negligence or willful misconduct of SCRRA under the terms of this MOU. (c) RCTC agrees to include indemnification and insurance provisions in substantially the form below in its third party contract for security guard services. Reference below to "Contractor" means and refers to RCTC's contractor providing security guard services to be funded under this MOU. (i) Contractor shall indemnify and hold RCTC, SCRRA, and their directors, officials, officers, agents, subcontractors, employees and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to alleged negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the Contractor, its officials, officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation, the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Contractor shall defend, at Contractor's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against SCRRA and/or their directors, officials, officers, agents, subcontractors, employees and volunteers. Contractor shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against SCRRA and/or their directors, officials, officers, agents, subcontractors, employees and volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Contractor shall reimburse SCRRA and their directors, officials, officers, agents, subcontractors, employees and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Contractor's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by SCRRA or their directors, officials, officers, agents, subcontractors, 17336.00603\29036184.1 Page 3 of 7 169 Memorandum of Understanding No. MU125-12 employees or volunteers. This provision shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. (ii) Contractor shall provide insurance endorsements stating SCRRA and their directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with regards to their general liability policy and automobile policy. With regards to worker's compensation and employee liability coverage, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against SCRRA and their directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Contractor. E. Notices hereunder shall be sent to the parties as follows: To SCRRA: To RCTC: Southern California Regional Rail Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Riverside, CA 92501 Attention: Contracts Administration Attention: Contract Administration F. This MOU constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this MOU, including, without limitation, attached Exhibits, and may only be amended by mutual written consent of the parties. G. The persons executing this MOU on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this MOU on behalf of said parties and that, by so executing this MOU, the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this MOU. H. The headings of all sections of this MOU are inserted solely for the convenience of reference and are not part of and not intended to govern, limit, or aid in the construction or interpretation of any terms or provision thereof. I. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this MOU is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder to this MOU shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision, covenant or condition of this MOU shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 17336.00603\29036184.1 Page 4of7 170 Memorandum of Understanding No. MU125-12 J. This MOU may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same agreement. Facsimile signatures will be permitted. K. Neither this MOU, nor any of a party's rights, obligations, duties, or interests hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part by either party without the prior written consent of the other party. Any such attempt of assignment shall be deemed void and of no force and effect. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed consent to any subsequent assignment, nor the waiver of any right to consent to such subsequent assignment. L. This MOU is by and between SCRRA and RCTC and is not intended and shall not be construed so as to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association, as among SCRRA and RCTC. M. Each party shall warrant to the other that, in the performance of this MOU, it shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes and ordinances and lawful orders, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. N. This MOU shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto, and shall not be assigned by any of the parties, without the written consent of the other parties. O. Either party shall be excused from performing its obligations under this MOU during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause beyond its control, including but not limited to: any incidence of fire, flood, acts of God, commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by the federal, state or local government, national fuel shortage, or a material act or omission by the other party, when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other party, and provided further that such nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the party not performing. / / [Signatures on following page] 17336.00603\29036184.1 Page 5 of 7 171 Memorandum of Understanding No. MU125-12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. MU125-12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this MOU No. MU125-12 to be executed on the date first above written. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION RAIL AUTHORITY COMMISSION By: By: TITLE: TITLE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Don O. Del Rio General Counsel By: Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission 17336.00603\29036184.1 Page 6 of 7 172 Memorandum of Understanding No. MU125-12 EXHIBIT A Schedule of Services FY16 /17 RCTC/SCRRA Security Guard Agreement Hours Per Day Services Location Quantity M-F Sa-Su Hours Per Week Rate Weekly Monthly Yearly Unarmed Standard Downtown Riverside Mission 1 8 24 88 $17.58 $1,547.0 4 $6,188.16 $80,446.08 Unarmed Standard Downtown Riverside Platform 1 8 16 $17.58 $281.28 $1,125.12 $14,626.56 Unarmed Standard South Perris 1 24 24 168 $17.58 $2,953.4 4 $11,813.7 6 Total $153,578.88 $248,651.52 The not to exceed amount for FY16/17 is $250,000. Page 7 of 7 17336.00603\29036184.1 173 AGENDA ITEM 8J RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment for On -Call Rail Operations Support Services WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve an increase of $2 million for the following agreements for the continued support of on -call rail operations services for a revised amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $4 million and amendments to extend the agreements for an additional two-year term; a) Agreement No. 12-25-022-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 12-25-022-00, with HDR Engineering, Inc.(HDR); b) Agreement No. 12-25-035-04, Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 12-25-035-00, with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. (Parsons Brinckerhoff); and c) Agreement No. 12-25-036-04, Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 12-25-036-00, with STV Incorporated (STV); 2) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to the consultants under the terms of the agreements; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission's Rail Department actively manages the operations, planning, and development of passenger rail issues in the county. In order to better serve the Commission, staff recommended and procured an on -call rail operations support consultant bench. At its January 2012 meeting, the Commission approved three agreements to provide on -call rail operations support services for a three-year term and two one-year options to extend the agreements for an aggregate value of $1 million. The term of the agreements, including the option years, expires in March 2017. In November 2014, the Commission approved a $1 million increase for a revised aggregate amount not to exceed $2 million. These on -call consultants have been used to develop and support significant rail -related projects for the Commission on an as -needed basis through the issuance of individual task orders. These consultant services Agenda Item 8J 174 support the Rail Department's ability to plan and develop rail capital and service improvements that allow for the efficient and effective use of the grant funding that is available. The on -call projects have been well distributed among the three consultants. For example, HDR assisted with design work for the rail improvement related to the 60/215 East Junction highway project, development of the Federal Rail Administration grant application for the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor project, and marketing and communications support for 91 Line improvements for an aggregate amount of $300,000. Parsons Brinckerhoff has been instrumental in developing the service scenarios and operations modeling for improvements on the 91 Line and Perris Valley Line (PVL) implementation, including BNSF negotiations, for $275,000. STV has supported the Rail Department with a San Jacinto Branch Line study and analysis for the full length of the track, design and engineering for the Riverside -Downtown Operations Control Center and preliminary engineering for the security camera network for the PVL stations and layover facility for an aggregate amount of $396,000. These amounts are representative of the key projects undertaken; there are additional projects not listed that utilize the balance of the approved authority. Staff recommends an extension in the contract term for two years to allow for project continuity and also an increase in the total authorization by $2 million to allow for critical planning projects to continue. These additional projects include development of the next generation rail study as part of the Commission's Strategic Assessment recommendations approved by the Commission at it's January 2016 workshop. In addition, there is the need for more security and service enhancements for PVL, support efforts for the Coachella Festival Train grants and service implementation, support for rail passenger service and station improvements, implementation and oversight of the First Mile/Last Mile Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee grant, and future grant development efforts including Cap and Trade funding. Staff recommends approval of an increase of $2 million for on -call rail operations services for a revised amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $4 million and a two-year term extension through March 2019 for each of the agreements. Multiple award, on -call, task order type contracts do not guarantee work to any of the awarded firms. Services will continue to be provided through the Commission's issuance of contract task orders to the consultants on an as -needed basis. Staff oversight of the contract will continue to maximize the effectiveness of the consultants and minimize the costs to the Commission. These expenditures are included in the FY 2016/17 budget or will be included in future budgets to address these projects. Agenda Item 81 175 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $1,000,000 N/A FY 2017/18+ $1,000,000 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Fund funds (rail); Budget Adjustment: No MSRC grant funds N/A 254199 65520 00000 0000 103 25 65520 GL/Project Accounting No.: 004201 81501 00000 0000 103 25 81501 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-414-e4tiate Date: 06/15/2016 Agenda Item 81 176 AGENDA ITEM 8K RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Hector Casillas, Senior Management Analyst Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment for On -Call Station Repair and Maintenance WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve an increase of $850,000 for the following agreements for continued support of on -call station repair and maintenance services for a total amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $2.1 million: a) Agreement No. 12-24-085-00 with Process Cellular Inc. (ProCell); and b) Agreement No. 12-24-116-00 with Braughton Construction Co Inc. (Braughton). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In September 2012 following a competitive procurement, the Commission awarded the two agreements referenced above to provide on -call station repair and maintenance services for a three-year term, and two one-year options, for a total authorization of $1.25 million. Station repair and maintenance services are necessary to support needs of the Commission's nine commuter rail stations. In order to provide these services, the Commission awarded these agreements for on -call services, with the work to be issued on an as -needed task order basis. Since that time, there has been an increased level of station repair and maintenance activities, which necessitates the need for additional funds. To date, $1.12 million has been obligated on task orders related to these projects, leaving $130,000 for the remaining term of the agreement. Staff project the need for the following additional funding: • $350,000 based on historical expenditure trends and future station repair and maintenance services required related to this agreement and funded using 2009 Measure A Western County rail funds; and • $500,000 for other station fencing, painting, canopies/shelters, and security equipment repairs and maintenance projects, for which Proposition 1B grant funds are available. These services, subject to Commission procurement policies, will assist staff and continue its efforts to carry on with necessary maintenance and repairs at all of the stations prior to the Agenda Item 8K 177 expiration of the two on -call services agreements. Staff recommends an increase of $850,000 in the aggregate authorization to allow for completion of the second year option expiring in November 2017. Multiple award, on -call, task order type contracts do not guarantee work to any of the awarded firms. Contractors will continue to be selected for specific tasks based on information contained in their proposal and/or competitive fee proposals for the specific tasks. Services will be provided through the Commission's issuance of contract task orders to the contractors on an as -needed basis. Staff oversight of the contract will continue to maximize the effectiveness of the consultants and minimize costs to the Commission. Staff recommends approval of a total increase of $850,000 for the continued support of on -call station repair and maintenance services with ProCell and Braughton, for a total amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $2.1 million. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $700,000 N/A FY 2017/18 $150,000 2009 Measure A Western County Rail No Source of Funds: funds; Proposition 1B capital and security funds Budget Adjustment: N/A 244001 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 244002 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 244003 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 244004 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 244006 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 GL/Project Accounting No.: 244010 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 244020 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 244021 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 244022 73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 004011 90701 00000 0000 265 31 90501 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-X14.6da j4 Date: 06/14/2016 Agenda Item 8K 178 AGENDA ITEM 8L RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Martha Durbin, Management Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Public Transportation — Annual Countywide Performance Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Riverside County Public Transportation — Annual Countywide Performance Report (Countywide Report) for Fiscal Year 2014/15. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Transportation funding in the state is governed by the Transportation Development Act (TDA). In order for the Commission to annually approve funding, the TDA requires the Commission to have a formal process in place wherein transit operator productivity and performance is reviewed. Data was compiled and audits of each transit operator, with the exception of the city of Beaumont (Beaumont), have been completed for FY 2014/15; Beaumont's financial information was derived from draft financial statements. Accordingly, this information becomes the basis for compiling and drafting the Countywide Report, which is intended to meet the TDA requirement. DISCUSSION: In July 2014, the Commission approved goals and objectives for crafting the Countywide Report. These goals and objectives are as follows: 1) The Countywide Report is to be a stand-alone review of transit service measured via annual audited financial performance. 2) The Countywide Report utilizes farebox recovery as the only mandated metric. 3) The Countywide Report is to also derive additional metrics that allow for a macro discussion of transit performance countywide. 4) The metrics are to be repeatable and deliver consistent results, which provide a baseline year and a recurring snapshot in time over many years. 5) The Countywide Report should possess the capability to be expandable to other modes. Agenda Item 8L 179 6) The Countywide Report requires the transit operators to utilize the TransTrack program for the reporting of operator specific performance information for a reliable and consistent pool of data to examine on an as -needed basis. The FY 2014/15 Countywide Report continues a comprehensive performance reporting program for Riverside County with the goal of documenting how public transit funding was spent and the results achieved for the dollars invested. The following represents a high-level recap of the information contained in the report. Farebox Recovery The primary and only state -mandated indicator described in the Countywide Report is farebox recovery ratio. Farebox recovery is the proportion that passenger fares, and other eligible revenues, contribute to the transit program's general operating expenses over and beyond the subsidy provided by the Commission and federal government. The farebox recovery ratio is extremely useful as a tool for measuring and assessing a transit program's strength. The overall countywide farebox recovery ratio for FY 2014/15 was 23.8 percent, up slightly from the prior period's 23.3 percent farebox recovery. This ratio reflects the interaction of operator fare policy, efficiency in the operators' handling of routine expenses, and riders' utilization of the service. Increasing farebox, with an additional $5.8 million in operating expenses and $1.7 million in added fares and qualified local support, points to a healthy countywide program. Overall, it is good news as each Riverside County public transit operator met or exceeded its minimum state -mandated farebox recovery ratio. Trips Per Capita Trips per capita reflect total transit trips provided in relation to the overall county population. The total population for Riverside County in FY 2014/15 was 2.27 million and the total transit trips provided were 16.5 million, both gaining a 1 percent increase from the prior reporting period. Considering all public transit modes of rail, fixed route bus, demand responsive dial -a -ride, and specialized transportation, a trips per capita rate of 7.2 was achieved during FY 2014/15, holding constant from the prior reporting period. This metric firmly identifies that even with increasing population, transit ridership continues to grow at the same rate thus demonstrating robust demand for public transit by Riverside County residents. Transit Related Resources Finally, a big picture perspective of Riverside County's public transportation system can be measured by reviewing the financial resources available to the transit operators. Service in FY 2014/15 increased by 6 percent indicating that more transit service was provided in Riverside County and therefore resources increased from prior fiscal year by 13 percent. Approximately $69.9 million in state and local funding resources was made available to support the county's operators. This increase indicates the provision of service can continue to be Agenda Item 8L 180 expanded at a rate sufficient enough to keep up with both population growth in Riverside County and the demand by residents for access to public transit. NEXT STEPS: Generally the public transit measures reported in the Countywide Report were positive and overall represent good news for the Commission and the operators. Sufficient resources were identified for the level of service provided to support mobility for Riverside County residents. Service is also identified by the report as being operated in a cost effective manner although more emphasis can be placed by the operators in addressing increases to ridership and farebox return. The above -referenced metrics and conclusions are more fully described in the attached FY 2014/15 Countywide Report. Staff will continue to provide oversight with respect to the data reporting process via the TransTrack system, as well as with the individual operator audits and financial reporting for FY 2015/16. With the continuing flow of data and financial reporting, this report will be updated and presented to the Commission in July 2017 for discussion. Upon receipt of the final Beaumont FY 2014/15 audited financial statements, staff will determine if there are any material changes to the information included in this report that should be reported to the Commission. Attachment: Riverside County Public Transportation — FY 2014/15 Countywide Report Agenda Item 8L 181 Riverside County Public Transportation - Annual Countywide Performance Report: Audit Year FY 2014/2015 Robert J. Yates Multimodal Services Director Riverside County Transportation Commission June 2016 Prepared by: AM MTRANSIT PLANNING 183 ��MEmo Msrside (oaep iro aporMion (ontmksian Riverside County Public Transportation  Annual Countywide Performance Report: Audit Year FY 2014/2015 Table of Contents Introduction 1 What's New in Riverside County Public Transportation? 1 Performance Reporting Purposes 7 Into the Measures 8 1. Policy and Compliance 8 2. Utilization 10 3. Accessibility and Coverage 12 4. Connectivity 19 5. Resources 20 Summary of How We Are Doing 22 Appendices 25 Appendix A  Definitions, Data Sets, and References 26 Appendix B  Detail on Public Transit Trips Provided, All Modes 27 Appendix C  Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators 28 Appendix D  Public Transit Fleet Size Over Three Years 32 Appendix E  Inventory Matrix of Services by Area, by Mode 33 rAM M J 184 PAGE 1111 MEN MEmo Wisiie (ounly ironsporWim Commission List of Figures and Tables Figure 1— Riverside Transit Agency — 74% Population Coverage within % of a Mile Figure 2 — SunLine Transit Agency — 84% Population Coverage within % of a Mile Figure 3 — Corona Cruiser — 73% Population Coverage within % of a Mile Figure 4 — Pass Transit — 84% Population Coverage within % of a Mile Figure 5 — Palo Verde Valley Transit — 90% Population Coverage within % of a Mile Figures 6A and 6B — Average Passenger Trip Lengths and Service Area Sizes Figure 7 — Riverside County Transit Trips by Mode Over Five Reporting Periods Figure 8 — Riverside County Transit Trips, Population and Trips per Capita Table 1— Countywide Transportation Development Act, Audited Farebox Recovery Table 2 — Public Transit Trips per Capita Table 3 — Trips per Capita Contrasted with Other Areas Table 4 — Bus and Rail Transfer Location Counts for Riverside County Table 5 — Public Transportation Resources in Riverside County: Commission Allocated State and Local Transit Funding, Vehicles and Vehicle Revenue Miles Table 6 — Summary of Countywide Performance 185 PAGE I IV MEN MEmo Msrsiie (ounly iroraporlolim (oamivon Riverside County Public Transportation — Annual Countywide Performance Report: Audit Year FY 2014/2015 Introduction This Riverside County Public Transportation Annual Countywide Performance Report, Audit Year FY 2014/2015 (Countywide Report) is the third such report prepared in compliance with Public Utilities Code Section 99244. This report addresses Transportation Development Act (TDA) requirements that county transportation planning agencies use to monitor transit provider performance. The Countywide Report also serves another purpose by providing a comprehensive, countywide picture of public transportation performance that documents public transit expenditures to Riverside County constituents. The Audit Year FY 2014/2015 reported here is now a year past, as of this writing, given the time it required to obtain audited transit expenditure and performance information. Contrasted with two prior audit periods, this Countywide Report examines transit experience in five performance areas, including policy and compliance, utilization, accessibility and coverage, connectivity and resources. Additionally, recent year transportation initiatives are highlighted, adding dimension to the snapshot of the public transit experience in Riverside County. What's New in Riverside County Public Transportation? Performance Trends During the Audit Year FY 2014/2015, Riverside County transit systems provided more than 106,000 public transit trips with transit vehicles traveling almost 1 million more revenue service miles than in the prior year. In doing so, Riverside County was bucking national trends that began to register declining public transit ridership. Holding its own in the provision of public and specialized transportation, even with the pressures of increasing population and ongoing development, Riverside County is continuing to successfully improve and enhance the mobility choices of its residents. rAM M J 186 PAGE11 MEN MEmo Wisiie (ounly ironsporWim Commission Perris Valley Line Opens Led by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), Metrolink's 91/Perris Valley Line had been under construction since October 2013 and began carrying its first fare -paying passengers on June 6, 2016. Referred to as the 91/PVL, this line is the first extension of the Metrolink network since 1994 when the Antelope Valley Line opened to link Palmdale and Lancaster to Greater Los Angeles with rail service. The 91/PVL extends Metrolink rail service for an additional 24 miles from the downtown Riverside station to south Perris. Four new stations were constructed at Riverside Hunter Park/University of California Riverside, Moreno Valley/March Field, Downtown Perris and South Perris. The project also has included construction and rehabilitation of railroad tracks, upgraded at -grade crossings and improvement of the existing track. The 91/PVL will provide greater access to Southern California's commuter rail network for residents in Menifee, Murrieta, San Jacinto, Hemet, Lake Elsinore and Wildomar. To expand access to this new rail line, the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) has made adjustments and restructuring of their connecting bus service schedules, which realign several existing routes and create two new bus routes. Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Feasibility Studied COACHELLA VALLEY— SAN GORGONIO PASS RAIL CORRIDOR SERVICE The first phase of the Coachella Valley — San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Study was completed in late 2015, and was intended to study the feasibility of an intercity passenger rail service between Indio in the Coachella Valley through the San Gorgonio Pass to Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS). The Purpose and Need Statement prepared as part of this study was a critical first step. That was completed in August 2015 and forwarded to the Federal Rail Administration (FRA), at which time the formal Alternatives Analysis began. This process, which follows FRA guidance, involved an extensive screening methodology and criteria by which to evaluate proposed route alternatives, including an initial five alternative routings. PAGE12 187 MEN MEmo Wisiie (ounly ironsporidim Commission The Alternatives Analysis forwarded to the FRA late in 2015 for review and approval concludes the following: Route Alternative 1, in which the alignment traverses the Coachella Valley through Riverside and Fullerton to Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS), is to be carried forward for analysis in the Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) evaluation processes... When compared to other route alternatives, Alternative 1: ■ Meets the project's purpose and need ■ Has relatively low construction complexity and low construction costs ■ Has a competitive passenger train travel time ■ Serves the largest population ■ Has the highest ridership and revenue forecast ■ Has no unreasonable environmental resource issues. RCTC Undertakes a Strategic Assessment MEI INE= Wversida Coln!? Troruoiiolm ComminF n At the direction of RCTC's Board of Directors, the Riverside County Strategic Assessment was undertaken this past year to examine the County's needs for transportation investment in light of the existing Measure A expenditure plan, changing economic and demographic trends in the County, evolving state and federal transportation policies, and the needs and desires of the public and key stakeholders. The Strategic Assessment is intended to provide findings and strategic recommendations to guide the Commission in proactively preparing for the County's future through Year 2040. Presented at the Commission's January 2016 Workshop, the Strategic Assessment identified four goal areas, proposing a menu of specific actions within each. These four goal areas include: 1. Plan for the Future 2. Maximize Our Assets 3. Increase Funding 4. Communicate More The Strategic Assessment findings include anticipated population growth of 926,000 additional residents by 2040, with recognition that meeting additional transit needs is constrained by very real funding limitations. By the same token, the Assessment indicated that in order to contribute to state goals of reducing greenhouse gasses, the county's rail and transit services should develop in concert with transit - oriented development and employment centers. The Assessment's analysis determines that current sources of funding for rail and transit services will be unable to fund what is planned through the Year 2040, with an estimated rail and transit funding gap of $233 million annually and no new significant sources of operations and maintenance currently under consideration at any level. PAGER 188 MEN MEmo Mwside (ounly irorsporlolicn (onmission The Strategic Assessment's Public and Stakeholder findings indicate that improved accessibility to public transit is an important need, with the public desiring more hours of service, service to more areas and easier and improved connections. While the public registers transportation issues as important, the Strategic Assessment's polling reports that the public currently places greater importance on issues related to crime, jobs and water. Many of the actions recommended by the Strategic Assessment have bearing upon the public transit operators and the service delivery network. Key among them is the development of a Long Range Transportation Plan. This type of planning document, for the 10 year period 2019-2029, seeks to balance direction for transportation service improvements with identified funding and the prioritization of projects. Such a long-range planning tool has never been developed for Riverside County. The Commissioners approved development of a Long Range Transportation Plan and the continued consideration of an additional local sales tax measure to be placed before Riverside County voters on the November 2018 or 2020 ballots, if feasible. Two New Transit Facilities Completed SunLine Transit Agency's New Intermodal Transit Center/ Administration Facility The SunLine Transit Agency's main office is located in Thousand Palms and its new facility was completed during the past year, following ground -breaking in January 2015. The 25,000-square-foot Administration Building provides a permanent home for the SunLine departments of General Administration, Operations, Maintenance, Customer Service, Marketing, Human Resources, Finance and Planning. This facility replaces a group of temporary structures that have housed the agency since 1985. PAGEI4 189 MEN MEmo Msrside (ounly irornporlolicn (onntsion Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency New Facility In Blythe, the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) commenced vehicle operations from its new facility in December 2014. This 3,000-square-foot facility is home to 16 staff and drivers with its 11 transit and support vehicles now housed on -site. The new facility is located next to Blythe's Main Street Park and Ride, a joint project between PVVTA and the City of Blythe. Future plans include the construction of a 4,000-square- foot maintenance facility and bus wash and a Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funded solar project for solar -equipped parking shades, an electric vehicle charging station and a large multimodal passenger stop. Among the multimodal services that PVVTA anticipates initiating from its new transit facility is the Blythe Wellness Express; the agency has sought Federal Transit Administration's (RTA) Rides to Wellness funding for this service. RTA Innovative Initiatives Veterans Travel Training and Veterans Bus Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) has developed a coordinated transportation service with the Loma Linda Veterans Administration (VA) Healthcare System called the Veterans Express Transit System (V.E.T.S). This service provides direct transportation to the Loma Linda Medical Center (VAMC) from four locations in western Riverside County. The four V.E.T.S. bus stops are in Murrieta, Perris, March Air Reserve Base and Moreno Valley. Veterans and their families travel free on the V.E.T.S. bus. Partnered with RTA's successful travel training program Freedom to Go, which facilitated its 250,OOOth ride this year, this coordinated transportation enables veterans to connect to the V.E.T.S. bus from RTA routes. In recent months, an average of 260 passenger trips were provided each month on V.E.T.S., with many passengers using a combination of RTA fixed routes and the new V.E.T.S bus. Most importantly to these riders, trips that previously took three hours or more are now much shorter, some less than two hours. Y.E.i.S. PIG( -VP LOCATION'S Y.o,;nu ri crow la)85.41.in Rd, Wirtx form. rey .Abu, e r reed, srr_ e..e eenrn Larwn. (IL ud Trd u. Penn; kni IeYe 11,1 rarell•riadcw.q ll,Sq ki...Mai On .11u,•rk..ss.ac,kimicA+ fea61+..trt sik »ObAWItAm ••x 2441 C...ray�rlrr141{ R 14 1£ilmwkd JIM filSOr ea Service operates on weekdays with a morning schedule in -bound to the Loma Linda VAMC beginning at 7:25 a.m. at the Murrieta VA Clinic and arriving by 9:15 a.m. at the VA Loma Linda. An afternoon return bus departs the VA Loma Linda at 3 p.m. and arrives back at its southernmost stop in Murrieta by 4:50 p.m. rAM M A 190 PAGE15 MEN MEmo Msrside (ounly iromporlolicn Commission The coordinated partnership of the RTA and V.E.T.S. service, which is administered by the VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, has been so successful that the VA is replicating it in other regions, beginning with Victor Valley and then Palm Desert. Anticipating continued success, this model may become recognized nationally as a solution for longer -distance transportation challenges for veterans. RTA Secures Almost $500,000 Annually in Recurring MediCal Healthcare Funding for ADA Trips Securing MediCal reimbursement for eligible non -emergency medical trips provided by public transit agencies has been an elusive goal but has been successfully achieved by RTA. Under a little-known MediCal regulation, and following a slow and arduous application process, RTA Dial -a -Ride service was approved by Riverside County Health Department as a MediCal Administrative Activity (MAA). As an MAA, RTA Dial -a -Ride enables the delivery of MediCal health services to eligible consumers by transporting them to their authorized service locations. Billing around $125,000 a quarter for MAA eligible trips provided to MediCal enrollees, RTA has brought in almost $500,000 in the last fiscal year and $1.2 million cumulatively since this initiative began during FY 2013/2014. RTA estimates that about 10 percent of its annual Dial -a -Ride trips are now being MediCal reimbursed, recovering about 5 percent of RTA's Dial -a -Ride annual program cost. Riverside's TRIP Program Celebrates 25 Years Riverside County is home to what has become a national model for volunteer transportation programs. This year TRIP, a volunteer escort -driver reimbursement program of the Independent Living Partnership, celebrated its 25`h year of helping Riverside County older adults, persons with disabilities and persons of limited means move about y the community and stay independent. Its program has been in ozens of communities across , away as replicated Pennsylvaniadand Massachusetts. In additionCalifornia, the prograandasfarm was recently approved by the Los Angeles County Board of le* Supervisors to introduce TRIP to Los Angeles County residents. The TRIP program fills gaps in the transportation network by providing transportation assistance through volunteer drivers to those among the general population who cannot drive, or are unable to use transit or Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) services because of chronic or debilitating conditions. Additionally, eligible participants may live in areas of the county where there are no other transportation services. During program year FY 2015/2016, 1,028 unique riders received 123,725 one-way trips, at an average cost per trip of $6.29 and traveling 1.8 million miles of escorted transportation. The subsidy per passenger mile was $0.43. TRIP participants live in 52 cities and unincorporated places, including Aguanga, Winchester, Mecca and Ripley. Ages of those receiving assistance spanned from 2 years old (with the Angel View TRIP component) to 98 years of age. Sixty-five percent of the passengers this year rAmm JI 191 PAGEI6 MEN MEmo Msrside (ounly iromporlolicn (onmission were 60 or older. Almost 20 percent were older than 80 years of age, and 38 passengers were over 90 years of age. Seventy-four percent were female. TRIP riders are generally people who are at risk of out -of -home placement, are isolated and alone, and usually have severely limited income. Since TRIP began, with trips first provided in 1993, it has supported 1.8 million one-way passenger trips and 20.5 million miles of escorted transportation in Riverside County. A mix of funding sources underwrite the TRIP program, which includes support from Western Riverside County's Measure A, the Older Americans Act, City of Palm Desert, City of Blythe and two human service organizations, Angel View and Inland Regional Center. TRIP also was the recipient of an FTA New Freedom grant, supporting volunteer driver mileage reimbursement for residents of the North Shore/Mecca/ Thermal areas. TRIP administrators assist other organizations in replicating TRIP's successes by providing recurring webinars and technical assistance to jurisdictions, counties, transit agencies and community -based organizations that wish to start a TRIP -model volunteer driver reimbursement program. TRIP staff also annually prepares and distributes 12,000 printed transportation guides, which provide a compilation of contact information for all of Riverside County's public and specialized transportation services, including Metrolink and commercial hail -ride services of taxis, Uber and Lyft. Performance Reporting Purposes This third year of the Annual Countywide Performance Report presents Audit Year FY 2014/2015 information that describes the County's public transportation experience against five performance categories. As noted, the Countywide Report presents the most recent audited performance, reflecting the time necessary to develop such audits but also ensuring that reported information is accurate. The Countywide Report's purposes, against its backdrop goal of compliance with law and the establishment of a countywide picture of transit, include the following objectives: ■ To present a countywide view of transit performance, in relation to a neutral reporting program of Riverside County's public transportation services. ■ To provide a reporting resource to support Commission -level transportation planning and programming decisions that can help identify transit issues related to land -use decisions at local and regional levels. rAmm JI 192 PAGE17 MEN MEmo Msrside (ounly irorsporlolicn (onmission ■ To show a snapshot in time, a benchmark set of measures against which to assess countywide trends and view public transit services. ■ To use outcome -based performance methodologies that meet federal statute PL-112-141 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) and the state of California Transportation Development Act, anticipating that similar performance -focused requirements will continue in the new federal transportation authorization of PL 114-94 Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). ■ To use a performance measurement framework expandable in the future to other modes and to other measures, potentially including vanpool, rideshare, 5-1-1 and bicycles and could be adapted to address Riverside County's SB 375 goals for reducing passenger vehicle emissions and greenhouse gases. Into the Measures Riverside County continues to use a mix of federal, state and local funding sources to provide public transportation to residents. RCTC is responsible for the programming of federal funding while directly managing state Transportation Development Act (TDA) and local Measure A funds. The transit operators in receipt of federal transit funding, FTA Section 5307 and Section 5311, directly manage their federal funds. The exception to that is that RCTC has administrative and operational responsibility for rail funding allocated to Riverside County by the U.S. Department of Transportation. As in the past, this report is focused only on the state and local funds that are received by Riverside County and examines indicators in relation to those. Measures selected create a multi -faceted, comprehensive picture of performance. Individual provider experience is considered for some measures while other measures examine Riverside County's three geographic regions of Western Riverside, the Coachella Valley and the Palo Verde Valley. 1. Policy and Compliance This first measure — farebox recovery ratio — has its basis in existing California law. California transit providers must achieve established minimum contributions to operating costs from their riders' fares, called farebox. The state of California TDA Section 6633.2 statutorily requires that in order to protect continued funding, public transit programs receiving Local Transportation Funds (LTFs) must collect passenger fares to contribute to overall operating costs at minimum proportions of fares to total expense. Expressed as the farebox recovery ratio, standards vary for rural and urban providers. Table 1 presents the farebox recovery ratios for each Riverside County transit provider who receives TDA LTF for the Audit Year FY 2014/2015. The mandatory farebox standards for these state -mandated minimums are 20 percent for urban transit providers and 10 percent for rural or demand response -only providers. PAGE I$ 193 MEN MEmo Ri+xrsiie County irornporlolicn (onntsion The Commission has established an approved "blended" minimum farebox policy that combines the urban and rural standards, given the large expanses of both urban and rural service areas that its providers must cover. These "blended" farebox ratios are unique to each operator and are approved by RCTC and Ca!trans. Additional information about farebox ratios includes: ■ Farebox ratios reflect the interaction of factors that include ridership, agency policy and operating costs; ■ Farebox levels are influenced positively by ridership, as more riders will generate increased fare revenue and therefore achieve a higher fare contribution to operating costs; ■ Farebox recovery reflects critical agency policy as transit fares are a key policy area and are determined by the transit provider; and ■ Farebox is influenced by attention to operating costs, as systems operating efficiently will have lower expenses and fares will represent a comparatively higher proportion of total costs, resulting in higher farebox ratios. TABLE 1— COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUDITED FAREBOX RECOVERY 131 Audit Results COUNTYWIDE BANNING BEAUMONT CORONA PVVTA RIVERSIDE RTA SUNLINE COUNTYWIDE All Operators 2014 2015 2015 [3[ 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 Total Operating Revenue from Passenger Fares [1] $ 21,064,023 $ 173,976 $ 236,771 $ 436,366 $ 140,278 $ 384,631 $ 15,435,458 $ 6,040,407 $ 22,847,887 Total Operating Expenses, Net Farebox [2] $ 90,325,987 $ 1,543,847 $ 1,848,121 $ 2,170,801 $ 900,928 $ 3,749,768 $ 58,292,112 $ 27,639,140 $ 96,144,717 Standard — Minimum Farebox Recovery Requirement, Per TDA and RCTC Adopted Policy No Standard 10% 10% 20% 10% 10% 17.44% 17.80% No Standard Actual —Farebox Recovery Ratio/Operator 23 3% 11.3% 12.8% 20.1% 15.6% 10.3% 26.5% 21.9% 23,8% Meeting Requirement Meets Meets Meets Meets Meets Meets Meets [1] Per RCTC Policy: Operators may supplement fare revenues with local funds and support such as Measure A [2] Net farebox is based upon agency policy, in conformance with TDA rules and RCTC adopted policy. [3] Beaumont Farebox derived from Beaumont's Draft Financial Statements as noted above, dated April 4, 2016. Source: Annual Financial Statements with Independent Auditor's Report For the Year Ending June 30, 2015 — All Operators' Final Transit Services Fund, except for Beaumont. How Are We Doing? Overall, it is good news, as each of the county's operators met or exceeded their farebox recovery ratio, achieving a countywide farebox recovery ratio of 23.8 percent in this Audit Year, up from the prior period's 23.3 percent farebox. In plain terms, this indicates that almost a quarter of public transit operating expense was born by public transit users in the FY 2014/2015 Audit Year. With each of Riverside County's public transit providers meeting statutorily required minimums, three providers increased their farebox recovery ratio from the prior year: SunLine from 19.9 percent to 21.9 percent, Palo Verde Valley Transit from 13.7 percent to 15.6 percent and the City of Beaumont from 11.4 percent to 12.8 percent. The City of Riverside's farebox recovery ratio declined from 11.1 percent in the prior year to 10.3 percent for this Audit Year. Farebox recovery ratios are a tool by which to assess a transit program's strength. This ratio reflects the interaction of operator fare policy, efficiency in its handling of routine expenses and riders' utilization of PAGEI9 194 MEN MEmo Drank (ounly irorsporlolicn(onmission the service. While it can be impacted by large, extraordinary expenses, these must be substantial to be reflected in changes in the farebox recovery ratio. Increasing farebox, with just an additional $5.8 million in operating expense and only $1.7 million in added fares and qualified local support, points to a healthy countywide program — one that is finding the right balance between rider contribution to cost, public subsidy and optimal operating efficiency. 2. Utilization The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has identified trips per capita as a significant measure of the relationship between transit trips provided and population growth. SCAG has a long history in the use of per capita transit trips as a measure of transit performance at local, county and regional levels dating back to the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan. For Riverside County as a whole and considering all public transportation modes of rail, fixed route, demand response and specialized transportation, the last Countywide Report calculates a trips per capita rate of 7.2. Table 2 details this as holding constant at 7.2 trips per capita for the Audit Year FY 2014/2015. The total reported trips — all modes — of 16.5 million reflects an additional 106,000 passenger trips over the prior reporting period, a 1 percent increase. Population increased by about 25,000 persons, also a 1 percent increase. TABLE 2 — PUBLIC TRANSIT TRIPS PER CAPITA Public Transportation Trips Provided Countywide FY 13/14 Countywide FY 14/15 Service by Mode Trips of Total Trips Western Riverside County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Trips %of Total Trips Rail [i] 898,216 5.5% 965,136 965,136 5.8% Public Bus, Fixed Route [2] 14,102,821 86.0% 9,464,541 4,645,097 49,673 14,159,311 85.8% Public Demand Response 823,649 5.0% 687,628 153,183 840,811 5.1% Specialized Transportation/Universal Cal[ Program 577,736 3.5% 464,256 78,009 543,296 3.3% ALL TRIPS: Including Rail, Public Transit, Measure A, JARC and New Freedom Programs [3] 16,402,422 100% 11,581,561 4,876,289 49,673 16,508,554 100% TOTAL POPULATION [4] 2,255,059 1,812,438 442,756 24,773 2,279,967 Trips per Capita for FY 2014/15 Total Population [4] 7,2 6.4 11.0 2.0 7,2 Notes: [1] Annualized from average weekday daily boardings at Riverside County stations: Riverside, 91 and Inland Empire -Orange County Lines. Reported April 26, 2016. [2] 'Public Bus, Fixed Route' trip counts do not include Specialized Transportation funded fixed route trips. [3] Public transit trips extracted from TransTrack'Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary' on May 10, 2016. Rail and Specialized Transit operators reported trips directly. [4] RCTC Mid -Year Revenue Projections 2015 and 2016 Agenda: California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit as of January 1, 2014 and 2015. rAm MA PAGE 110 195 MEN MEmo Msisiie (ounlyirorsporlolicn (ommission How Are We Doing? In comparing trips per capita for Southern California counties, areas with multiple transportation modes and higher provision of transit services in highly populated urban areas will have higher trips per capita rates. Comparing available National Transit Database (NTD) information for 2014, Riverside County's trips per capita rate of 7.2 is well behind Los Angeles County's rate of 41.9, San Diego County's MTS rate of 23.3 and Orange County's rate of 16.1. Riverside County is on par with San Bernardino County's Omnitrans at 10.2 trips per capita; San Bernardino is also a county of vast area and low -density residential development. Riverside County does not presently have sufficient funding to double its trips per capita rates, as examined carefully in the Strategic Assessment, 2016. Table 3 contrasts trips per capita for individual transit operators and in relation to their service area population with data from the NTD reported for various California and other peer -type transit programs. Ridership reported for SunLine, Riverside Transit Agency and the Corona Cruiser in Table 3 is derived from Audit Year FY 2014/2015 ridership, rather than their NTD data which was slightly different given reporting cut-off dates. Population, service area size and population density per square mile are also presented to describe other agencies' context. TABLE 3- TRIPS PER CAPITA CONTRASTED WITH OTHER AREAS 2014 National Transit Database Service Area Population Motor Bus Statistics Only Unlinked Passenger Trips Trips per Capita Service Area Square Mileage Population per Square Mile (In persons) Riverside Countywide Annual Performance Report \* 2,279,967 14,465,615 6.3 4,499 507 SunLine Transit Agency (from Countywide Report) 423,644 4,674,654 11.0 1,120 378 Riverside Transit Agency (from Countywide Report) 1,700,356 9,233,629 5.4 2,725 624 Corona Cruiser (from Countywide Report) 160,000 168,303 1.1 41 3,902 NTD Motor Bus Statistics Only Los Angeles Metro 8,626,817 361,601,141 41.9 1,513 5,702 Long Beach Transit 800,000 28,480,560 35.6 98 8,163 Denver Regional Transportation Department, Colorado 2,876,000 76,657,870 26.7 2,340 1,229 Montebello Bus Lines 315,074 7,934,976 25.2 151 2,087 San Diego MTS 2,218,791 51,630,106 23.3 716 3,099 San Mateo County Transit District 737,100 13,248,248 18.0 97 7,599 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 1,880,876 32,858,645 17.5 346 5,436 Orange County Transit Authority 3,041,754 48,904,819 16.1 465 6,541 Central Florida Transportation Authority (LYNX), Florida 1,959,812 29,033,819 14.8 2,538 772 Sacramento Regional Transit 1,035,779 13,657,668 13.2 231 4,484 Antelope Valley Transit Authority 349,050 3,606,357 10.3 1,200 291 Omnitrans (San Bernardino County) 1,484,000 15,119,122 10.2 463 3,205 North San Diego County Transit District 849,420 8,135,330 9.6 403 2,108 Victor Valley Transit Authority 334,988 1,816,026 5.4 424 790 Valley Metro, Phoenix, Arizona 3,629,114 17,832,432 4.9 732 4,958 King County Department of Transportation, Washington 2,017,250 1,074,519 0.5 2,134 945 Source: National Transit Database (http://www.ntdprogram.govintdprogram/profiles.htm) NTD Transit Profiles/TransitAge cySearch/2014 \* Source: As documented in this report and inclusive of some NTD-reported data, but including additional data sources. Table 3 depicts Riverside County trips per capita measures against a service area context that shows none of the neighboring agencies nor do selected systems from elsewhere in the country match the 2,725 square miles of RTA service area. While the Denver RT, King County DOT and Florida LYNX systems have service areas approaching but not equivalent to that of RTA's, each has higher density of rAM MA PAGE 111 196 MEN MEmo Wisiie (ounly ironsporidim Commission population per square mile. Higher population densities always make public transit an easier proposition. Within the County and among these NTD reporters, SunLine is achieving the highest trips per capita rate of 11.0 trips per person per annum. And while the Corona Cruiser's trips per capita rate is quite low at 1.1 trips per capita, this does not reflect the RTA ridership of Corona residents on local Routes 1 and 3 or ridership on Express Routes 206, 216 and 794; nor does it include ridership on the Corona Dial -a -Ride for which general public trips are provided with City general funds. Certainly other systems among these NTD reporters are achieving higher trips per capita rates, but doing so within smaller service areas that are more densely populated. Nonetheless, this measure of trips in relation to population remains a measure to monitor over time, influenced by a range of factors related to expansion of the transportation network, population growth, development patterns and larger economic trends. 3. Accessibility and Coverage Some measure of transit coverage is important, given Riverside County's geographic expanse with its mix of low -density urban, suburban and rural environments. A measure of population coverage is presented, the percentage of residents living within % of a mile of public fixed -route transit. This coverage measure currently is fixed -route focused only, not including demand response services. Several public demand response programs are operating in low -density areas of Riverside County. This %-mile metric is greater than the typical % -mile walkable distance that is commonly used by transit planners to measure service accessibility. It does, however, suggest the public transit sphere -of - influence as the %-mile envelope mirrors the ADA requirement for the provision of complementary paratransit to eligible persons with disabilities. The indicator enumerates total population living within % mile of local fixed route service or within % mile of a commuter express service bus stop, defining a proportion of total service area population. This accessibility measure presents a "30,000-foot-level" assessment of public transit's fixed route coverage in a given service area. Five maps follow (Figures 1 through 5), depicting each transit provider's service area to identify the population served as a proportion of the total population, limited to persons living within Riverside County. How Are We Doing? Population coverage ranges from a high of 90 percent within the %-mile buffer for PVVTA to a low of 73 percent within the %-mile buffer for the City of Corona. Service changes in RTA's fixed -route network during the Audit Year centered on improved service frequencies and later evening and night service on weekdays and a new Sunday service. While frequency and span of service increased service accessibility overall with respect to population, these changes did not increase the service area footprint so RTA saw no increase in coverage via this reporting metric from the prior year. rAM MA PAGE 112 197 ��MEmo Msrside (ounly irorsporlolicn (wmission SunLine expanded its Line 15 in to Desert Edge and made enhancements to Lines 80 and 81 in the City of Indio, while Line 90 in the City of Coachella improved connectivity to new developments. These new service changes increased SunLine's %-mile service area population coverage to 84 percent, a 3 percent increase over the prior year. Modest changes were made to the Corona Cruiser, eliminating a loop on the Blue Line near Magnolia and Fullerton avenues and extending the Red Line loop near Ontario and Rimpau avenues. Neither of these changes had an effect on the coverage area from the prior year. Saturday service on the Red Line into the Dos Lagos shopping center expanded service hours on the weekend. Overall, the city population coverage remained at 73 percent. Pass Transit made several enhancements to its fixed -route service, including a realignment of Route 1 in Banning, the absorption of Route 11 into Route 4 and the elimination of Routes 17 and 40. In addition, the commuter Route 120 increased Saturday services hours to accommodate weekend Metrolink passengers. These service changes were made as a result of the recommendations of the Comprehensive Operational Analysis of the Pass Transit system, but they had no effect on population coverage from the prior year, remaining at 84 percent. No changes were made to the Palo Verde Valley Transit service system. However, a change on the population calculation that more accurately excludes the Ironwood State Prison population has increased PVVTA's population coverage to 90 percent, up from 72 percent in the prior year. rAm MA PAGE 113 198 r IMME Raxrside (war ftim (onmision FIGURE 1— RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY — 74% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE Rancho Cur arnortga Or{turio -Norcr f �`Cnrnria Trabuco Canyon Rancho Santa Margarita c otc de Gaza }2ialta E'e - Fontana San Bernardino Highland Colton Redlands �___` Loma Linda ---Ruliidoux -: Mira „• ,_ Loma � Riversides $.I '1 San Clcrric.nta EA t Perris\` RTA Bus Routes Commuter Bus Routes Population of Riverside Transit Agency {RTA} District Service Area & Within 3/4 Mile of RTA Bus Routes Yucaipa tf�l F� Temecula Banning Beaumont Va{le' Vista, 3f4 Mile Buffer POPULATIO 0-49 50-135 136 - 279 Service Area = 314 Mile Buffer _ 280 - 529 _ 530-1,017 _ 1,018 - 2,407 1,747,410 (100%) =1,295,774(74°%) • Yucca Vdl ley — �� {� pesert liot Springs I Palm Springs Riverside County Boundary r Cathedr,il C=t; R ncho Mirage Gala Source: 2010 US_ Census. DEC _10_SFF_P1, Brock lev, Methodology: e.g. -.Census Block Population = 5.000, % of Cer 81ock within 3!d mile buffer = 50%, Estimated Population of Cerrsu- Block within 3/4 tulle hd fer=..2,500. Projection: NAD 1983_Slate P1ane,_Calrfornia_Vi F1PS_ 0408_Feet. Boundaries edited by.,): Forgiarira RTA - GlSWS, May 2016 rAMm A PAGE I 14 199 Mt Bart Jacinto State Park FIGURE 2 — SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — 84% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE Desert Hot f Springs.(.1:. f - 1 San 8erna rdrna Nation a! Forest Palm Springs Sunline Bus Routes Commuter Bus Routes Rancho Mirage 3Jecncn: NAL+ 1353_StareP.ane_:7:aiiicrn.a_VI_FIPS_3,76_=eer GISWS. May cC.16 Source: 2O1L. LI.S. Census. Cathedra City r Rlmsde (Quay irarep rIalkii (eeeaeisim Population of SunLine Service Area & 3/4 Mile of SunLine Bus Routes La Quinta POPULATION 0 - 49 _ 280 - 529 50 - 135 _ 530 - 1,017 136 - 279 1,018 - 2,4D6 Service Area = 422.874 (100%) 314 Mile Buffer = 354,708 (84°%) Joshua Tree t.S.‘ Nattonat - Park oachella Thermal 314 Mile Buffer Salton Sea Riverside County 111 San Dieu❑ Countv L.71re,-izr 'o ^±v rAMm A PAGE I 15 200 r wn,nide (xknt,frcinp rIalkn hintmezlai FIGURE 3 - CORONA CRUISER — 73% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE I i Chino i `�� a°,ne' P j.--- 2nd - Rive � Norco Riverside 44 ^9'- Hills 1 _ n O° \ 3 II m San Bernardino i Riverside h� P p County 11 County Corona MunrcipAirp w7 cow e Q V e ®Py Aviatioaf •r ' H1•� �'i��. ti „ { o° �a 005 May •♦ — t • P. `ac • i Cleveland• National •♦• Forest •♦ ` POPULATION♦ ♦ o� 0 - 49 280 - 529' �N 0 50 - 135 530 - 1,017 N.-.` • 136 - 279 1,018 - 2,406 ♦ 470 Service Area = 170,964 (100%) k S� 3/4 Mile Buffer = 125,617 (73%) Cruiser Bus Routes Data Source 2010 U.S. Census, DEC _'10_SF1_PI, Block level date Methodology e.g. Census Block Popufatian=..000, %of Census Block within 314 mile buffer = 50%, Estimated Population of Census Block within 3(4 mile buffer = 2500 Projection NAD_1993_State PFane_Califomia VI_FEPS_0406_Feet �PQ o RfVe` 'pa I n� 5 Population of Corona Cruiser & Dial -A -Ride Service Area & within 3/4 Mile of Cruiser Bus Routes 314 Mile Buffer I a rAMM .A 16 201 r Ilnnsi le coanylronspurlolion conaoe4:11 FIGURE 4 — PASS TRANSIT — 84% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE I Lakeview Gilman nOi :i C1S i--,,,zRamona Expy . Population of Pass Transit Service Area & 3/4 Mile of Pass Bus Routes Cilerry Valley Highland uyiso�siSprings �Sr f drook!tle Ave 1 I� _11 Beauront E:1h20111 -11" l � --. -- _.— i. Bannir , 7 Beaumont Ill Pass Transit Service Area • Riverside County ——.—._.— POPULATION D - 49 280 - 529 50 - 135 530 - 1,017 136 - 279 I= 1.013 - 2.405 SerViceArea = 84,113 (100%) 3/4 Mile Buffer = 70-534 (84%) Pass Transit Bus Routes' Commuter Bus Routes Data Source: 2010 U.S. Census, DE C_7C_sr 1.P1- LA ;.,;a.41- Methodoiogy: e.g.. Census Block Populh -on = 5 60fl, 9;.7' .. --- Block within 314 mile buffer= 59%. Estim-1 Populaaik, r:1_ -,.cnn rAM M J 17 202 Illllr IMmE Rims:* (way ironspurMan coeooessini FIGURE 5 - PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT — 90% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE Population of Palo Verde Valley Transit Service Area & 3/4 Mile of PVVTA Bus Route PVVTA Service Area Bourrdaryr PVVTA Bus Routes 3/4 Mile Buffer Ironwood State Prison POPULATION 0 - 49 =I 280 - 529 50 - 135 530 - 1.617 136 - 279 1.018 - 2,617 Service Area = 16.376 (100%) 314 Mile Buffer = 14,819 (90%) rdore. r o 1,ac1 .7:d1e '7SG poputation of 7.595 has been rcluded from these ca.' Riverside County ��a �I� 13- .dth Ave d ...l51. -..� `��-j1 �'• R4 5th Ave �a �e Palo ▪ Verde College �� I v a 8th ve ,.1L ...7 f. em Ave r� m 5161A1.le 616 Ave E 'm' h Ave Ism CI� r 1mA4A FieJersW.Av-E x t Mesa Verrfe�.,;) ' O -17th Ave _. - 481n Ave 1.5t5A Alnir Riverside _ I 214 County g 22 .pl Ava_�� '_2nd AveJ;�� _ - F �c Sk RI v CS � m5: - °d 2, -, Av_e_9, r24f h Ave" 25th i Ripley NI' 1111 m-i"d{��2615 Ave 'llPhl1lr,�w tn26thAve A Ave r- p� a 'ipfh a Palo Verde HS. )(M- ART 'Baldwin Senior `Apartments ~ __ r7!u'r.:� is w;- sr,., Casa Encinas( •, TI�See�eYAv ;I e 71h Ar 1 { r 1j •. a m Atg_I E Q - I 25th 22 [Ave x 3 I I) I` 36111Av, 'Eh▪ re• nberg 'JJ r� a I.41V 251n Ave 111 41 Peter 2. .-tyre Av!. 2Sth Ave1- La Par County rAM• M .A 18 203 MEN MEmo Wisiie (ounly ironsporWim Commission 4. Connectivity A measure of connectivity is critical for this large county, where trip distances often make it necessary to transfer between systems. Transfers between transit routes, modes, systems and corridors characterize a robust transportation network. While riders prefer a one -seat ride and transit systems strive to provide that in known corridors of travel, transferring becomes necessary to accommodate the breadth of trip origins and destinations that exist across and outside of the individual operator service areas. The connectivity indicator reported here counts the existing physical connections between transit routes and transportation systems in Riverside County. These may be transfers between routes within a given system or transfers between systems, such as the Route 110/210 connector jointly operated by SunLine and RTA. This route, which includes bus service to Metrolink and with the new 91/PVL Line stations, will reflect new transfer opportunities between bus and rail in future audit periods. This connectivity indicator also includes inter -county transfers, such as: ■ Pass Transit's Commuter Link 120 to the Loma Linda VAMC and Metrolink into San Bernardino; ■ RTA's Route 204 to Montclair Plaza and Route 216 to the Loma Linda VAMC into San Bernardino County; ■ RTA's Commuter Link Express Routes 216 and 794 into Orange County; ■ RTA's Commuter Link Express Routes 202 and 217 into San Diego County. TABLE 4 - BUS AND RAIL TRANSFER LOCATION COUNTS FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY Public Transportation Transfer Locations Fixed -Route and Rail Western Countywide Riverside Coachella Palo Verde Countywide FY 13/14 County Valley Valley Totals FY 14/15 # % FY 14 15 1 FY 14/15 [2] FY 14/15 # Intra-System Bus Intra-County Bus, Within County Regional Bus Transit Between Counties Regional Rail and Inter -City Bus 1,070 85% 1,050 114 20 1,184 82% 66 5% 106 7 0 113 8% 77 6% 71 4 0 75 5% 42 3% 63 11 1 75 5% TOTAL 1,255 100%1 1,290 136 21 1,447 100% [1] Reflects RTA and Corona service changes as of May 2016. [2] Reflects SunLine's January 2016 service change. Source: See Appendix C, Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators, for detail by operator. How Are We Doing? Table 4 reports increases in the raw number of transfers and in the proportions of connections between systems and between counties. More than 150 additional transfer opportunities were documented for this Audit Year. RTA and Corona both saw increases in transfers within their respective systems. Intra- rAM MA PAGE 119 204 MEN MEmo Ri+xrsiie Cowry iromporldim Commission county transfers almost doubled countywide, from 66 to 113 for this Audit Year, an increase of 71 percent. A decline of two inter -county bus transfer locations was reported; however, an increase by 33 or 78 percent transfers in rail -to -bus transfers substantially offsets this. Furthermore, the addition of more regional connections is an encouraging trend for expanding riders' travel options and choices. 5. Resources This final measurement area reflects the combined resources that together represent Riverside County's investment in public transportation. Resources list in Table 5 present a composite picture of public transportation for the three geographic subareas of Riverside County, including: ■ State and local funding that support service and can be used as a "match" for federal funding. ■ Public transit vehicles by which these programs can provide trips. ■ Vehicle revenue miles, which quantify service supply of public fixed route and demand response transportation across the large service areas of each provider. Table 5 also includes two performance indicators: vehicles per square mile, reflecting the current system fleet size in relation to service areas, and vehicle revenue miles per square mile, which reflects the volume of service provided within respective service areas. TABLE 5 — PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY: COMMISSION ALLOCATED STATE AND LOCAL TRANSIT FUNDING, VEHICLES AND VEHICLE REVENUE MILES Public Transportation Resources, Two Time Periods FY 13-14 Countywide Totals FY 14-15 %change Countywide from FY Totals is-ia Western Riverside County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley State and Local Transit Funding, Excluding all Federal $ $61,835,874 $ 49,811,283 $ 19,352,121 $ 825,249 $ 69,988,653 13% Programmed LTF and Measure A Transit, FY 2014/15, exclusive of state and local rail funding Transit Vehicles (fixed route and paratransit excluding taxis) [1] RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Vehicle Revenue Miles (fixed route and paratransit) ]z] RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Transit Service Area Square Mileage (Total County=7,206 sq. mi.) [3] 484 382 104 8 494 2% 16,856,113 13,497,152 4,161,847 171,288 17,830,287 6% 4,499 2,337 1,120 1,042 4,499 0% Measure - Vehicles per Square Mile 0.11 0.16 0.09 0.01 Measure - Vehicle Revenue Miles Per Square Mile 3,747 5,775 3,716 164 0.11 2% 3,963 6% [1] Transit Vehicles: reported directly by operators on April 28, 2016, to RCTC staff. [2] Revenue Miles: extracted from TransTrack'Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary' on May 11, 2016. [3] Square mileage: for total county from U.S. Census Quick Facts; SRTP for SunLine; GIS analysis for RTA presented in Figure 1; for PVVTA presented in Figure 3. rAm MA PAGE 120 205 IMENI MEM Ri+xrsiir (ounly toraporlolicn (onmission How Are We Doing? Local transit funding increased in this Audit Year by $8.1 million from the prior period. This 13 percent increase includes funding reserves but also reflects an improving economy, with resultant increases in state and local sales tax receipts. Transit vehicles countywide increased modestly by 2 percent, while the vehicles per square mile indicator did not change in this Audit Year, holding 0.11 vehicles per square mile for the combined total of transit agency service areas. The vehicle revenue miles per square mile shows an increase of 6 percent, this Audit Year over last, and reflects an added million miles of revenue service. This documents that more transit service was provided on Riverside County roads. Given there was essentially no increase in the transit service area footprint across the county, this increase was largely in service frequency or in increased operating hours or days, which is much desired by regular transit users. To provide further context to this county's challenges in size and distance, Figures 6A and 68 contrast trip length and service area size among various transit agencies, using agency data from the NTD. Long trip lengths are depicted for SunLine, averaging 7.14 miles per passenger trip and followed by RTA at 6.92, both a consequence of and a response to service areas of considerable size. Corona's relatively small city size is reflected in its average trip length of 1.01 miles. FIGURES 6A AND 6B — AVERAGE PASSENGER TRIP LENGTHS AND SERVICE AREA SIZES Average Trip Length National Transit Database, 2014 I Antelope Valley Transit Authority Victor Valley Tra nsit Authority Su n I ine Transit Agency Riverside Transit Agency Central Florida Transportation Authority (LYNX) Santa Clara Valley Tra nsportation Authority North County Tra nsit District (San Diego County) Om nitra ns San Mateo County Transit District Valley Metro (Phoenix, AZ-) LA Metro Orange County Tra ns it Authority Sacramento Regional Transit San Diego NITS Montebello Bus Lines Long Beach Transit Corona Cruiser OEM l.Ixi 4tin Average Miles per Passenger Trip TAM M J 1V !h Service Area Square Mileage National Transit Database, 2014 Riverside Transit Agency Central Florida Transportation Authority ( LYNX) LA Metro Antelope Valley Transit Authority Sonline Transit Agency Valley Metro (Phoenix, AZ.) San Diego WS Orange County Transit Authority Omnitrans Victor Valley rransa Authority North CountyTransit District {San Diego County) Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Sacramento Regional Transit Montebello Ras Lines Long Beach Transit San Mateo County Transit District Corona Cruiser 2,725 1,120 r I� r L L i 41 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Square Miles 3,000 PAGE 121 206 MEN MEmo Msniie (ooOf incaracialim (wnmcvon Summary of How We Are Doing The FY 2014/2015 Audit Year recorded various favorable trends, reflected in Table 6. Farebox recovery at 23.8 percent is up slightly from the prior year, with transit users across the county contributing almost a quarter of the trip cost through their fares. Passenger trips, on rail and buses, are up 1 percent; now more than 16.5 million passenger trips are taken in Riverside County. Trips per capita at 7.2, while not increasing, is holding steady in the face of continuing population growth. The measure of transit accessibility and coverage establishes a countywide average of 81 percent of the population as within 3/ mile of public transit fixed -route service, an increase of 5 percent from the prior year. TABLE 6 — SUMMARY OF COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE Riverside County Public Transportation Summary of Countywide Performance FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 %ChngFY13/14 from Farebox Recovery Ratio 25.5% 23.3% 23.8% 2% Total Transit Trips, with Metrolink 15,847,276 16,402,422 16,508,554 1% Excluding Metrolink 14,958,432 15,504,206 15,543,418 0% Transit Trips Per Capita 7.1 7.2 7.2 no change Transit Accessibility and Coverage 77% 77% 81% 5% Countywide Average 3/4 Mile Population Accessibility to Fixed Route Service Bus Stop Transfer Connections 1,315 1,255 1,447 15% Intra-System 88.3% 85.3% 81.8% -4% Intra-County Bus, Within County 3.4% 5.3% 7.8% 48% Regional Bus Transit Between Counties 5.8% 6.1% 5.2% -16% Regional Rail and National Inter -City Bus 2.5% 3.3% 5.2% 55% FY 14/15 Transportation Resources State and Local Operating Funds $53,903,436 $61,835,874 $69,988,653 13% Public Transit Vehicles (Fixed Route and Paratransit) 447 484 494 2% Vehicle Revenue Miles (Fixed Route and Paratransit) 16,132,145 16,856,113 17,830,287 6% Square Miles of Transit Service Area 4,887 4,499 4,499 Vehicles Per Square Mile 0.09 0.11 0.11 2% Vehicle Revenue Miles Per Square Mile 3,301 3,747 3,963 6% Bus transfer locations reflect a 48 percent increase for intra-county connections and 55 percent increase in bus -to -rail connections, an excellent trend that broadens choices for riders making regional trips. Transit funding provided from the state of California and by Riverside County residents grew by 13 percent, to almost $70 million. This helped to fund a 6 percent increase in the number of vehicle revenue miles traveled, 1 million more miles and a measure of increased supply in transit service rAM M. � PAGE 122 207 MEmo Ri+xrsiie (ouAy irorapodolio (onmksicn provided. In addition, the number of vehicles increased slightly, now almost 500 transit vehicles countywide. Riverside County's array of public transit modes and relative utilization of rail, bus, demand response and specialized transportation is depicted in Figure 7 for five reporting periods. A steady increase in the volume of trips provided is shown, both within each mode and between reporting periods. FIGURE 7 — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT TRIPS BY MODE OVER FIVE REPORTING PERIODS „ 18000 Annual One -Way Passe nger Trips 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 FY 05/06 1 1 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 1 Eli 1 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 • Regional Rail Specialized Transportation Public Demand Response MI Public Bus, Fixed Route Note: Change in how Metrolink trips for Riverside County were reported between FY 05/06 and FY 11/12. Regular fixed -route service remains the dominant mode, providing 86 percent of all trips. Rail trips are 6 percent of the total trips provided and will likely grow with the initiation of the Perris Valley Line. Demand response trips — largely, but not exclusively, ADA-complementary paratransit — are 5 percent of trips taken. Specialized Transportation, just 3 percent of all trips and the smallest mode, often provides otherwise hard -to -serve trips for specialized and dependent populations. FIGURE 8 — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT TRIPS, POPULATION AND TRIPS PER CAPITA 18,000,000 16,000,000 - 14,080,000 12,000,000 - 10,000,000 8,000,000 2,000,000 0 13,886,266 6.9 2,005,477 FY 05/06 15,847,276 15,255,883 2,217,77 16,402,422 16,508,554 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.2 - 7.0 6.5 6.0 2,227,577 2,255,059 2,279,967 FY 11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/1; =Passenger Trips =Population —Trips Per Capita rAm M J PAGE 123 208 MEN MEmo Msrside (ounly irornporlolicn (onrn sion Figure 8 depicts these same countywide ridership levels in relation to population and the trips per capita indicator, holding steady through this Audit Year. Appendix B details ridership by service for this Audit Year and past reporting periods. Appendix E presents a detailed service matrix of public and specialized transportation providers by the County's three geographic regions. Overall, the findings of the FY 2014/2015 Countywide Performance Report present a number of positive trends. More transit services are being provided, with greater frequency, more regional connections and at supply levels that are keeping pace with a growing population. Increasing local revenue available to public transit is helping to make modes increase in service possible. Transit providers' efficiency in managing resources and revenue are reflected in a solid 23.8 percent contribution by riders and other local support to the costs of services. Sustaining and building upon these trends will set the goals for the coming year. rAm M J PAGE I24 209 CZ) IlEmn Wiside CooOf%rap t:rhon (ommision Appendices Appendix A — Definitions, Data Sets, and References Appendix B — Detail on Public Transportation Trips Provided, All Modes Appendix C — Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators Appendix D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Three Years Appendix E — Inventory of Public and Specialized Transportation Services by Area, By Mode rAM M J 25 210 ��MEmo Msrside (oaep irmaporMion (ommisran Appendix A  Definitions, Data Sets, and References " = to Sources lTr 'MAll trips TransTrack data  extracted from Table 2  SRTP Service Summary on May 10, 2016. - One-way passenger boardings of fixed - route, paratransit, deviated fixed -route; - Metrolink boardings at Riverside County stations. Operating expense FY 2014/15 Annual Financial Statements with Independent Auditor's Report. Definition from March 2008 adopted Commission policy, all operating expense object classes exclusive of depreciation and amortization, vehicle lease expense. PUC 99247(a). Fare revenue FY 2014/15 Annual Financial Statements with Independent Auditor's Report. Definition from March 2008 adopted Commission policy: Fare revenue plus supplemental fare revenues from local support, which may include interest, advertising, etc. as provided for in PUC 6611.3. Transit route structure Active service operating along a fixed -route or deviated fixed -route as of June 30th. GIS shape files for active routes. County population data at the block level - for service area coverage maps 2010 - US Census 2010 total county population and block level data. County population data  for trips per capita calculations CA Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, January 1 population for 2015. Total county population estimates for the audit year in question. Transit transfer data: Intra-system Inter -county Regional Transfer locations at which routes connect; each location counted only once; counts were constructed and validated by the operators. Count each stop -level transfer location one time for each operator, as of June 30, 2015. Vehicle revenue miles TransTrack data  extracted from Table 2  SRTP Service Summary on May 10, 2016. Annual revenue service miles as of June 30, 2015. Or total vehicle service miles, inclusive of deadhead. Square mileage US Census County square mileage Operator service area square mileage reported in NTD. Information reported to NTD, by operator. Accessibility and coverage GIS calculation for Figures 2 thru 6. The methodology used to calculate population within the % mile buffers and service areas is included on each map. Using the local California State Plan Coordinate system with distance units measured in feet, buffer and service area polygons for each set of transit routes were first overlaid on top of the area's 2010 US census blocks. Then, 2010 census population counts for each block intersecting these polygons were applied to the corresponding buffer or service area using an area -ratio calculation. If, for example, only Y. of the area of a census block fell within the buffer or service area then only % of the population of that census block was applied to it. The sum of all these census block calculations, in turn, comprised the population estimate for the corresponding buffer or service area. rAm M J PAGE 126 211 CBI liMmE &Tinkle CooOf UonsporMitn Conuntsrrin Appendix B - Detail on Public Transit Trips Provided, All Modes Public Transportation Trips Provided RCTC Coordinated FY 11/12 Plan RCTCs Annual Report FY 12/13 RCTCs Annual Report FY 13/14 RCM's Annual Report FY 14/15 %of Total Nof Vehicles %of aof Vehicles %of Jl of Vehicles %of Service by Mode [1] Trips Trips Total in Active Trips Total in Active Trips Total Trips^Active Service Trips Service Trips Service Trips Rail [2] 878,438 6% 888,844 6% 898,216 5% 965,136 6% RCTC Commuter Rail - Riverside 215,864 208,230 175,032 160,388 RCTC Commuter Rail- Inland Empire Orange County 455,510 500,786 553,520 626,557 RCTC Commuter Rail - 91 207,064 179,828 169,664 261,058 Public Bus, Fixed Route [3] 13,115,046 86% 269 13,603,825 86% 380 14,102,821 86% 306 14,159,311 86% RTA FR 6,555,135 94 6,861,830 191 7,155,365 124 7,203,364 SunLine FR 4,436,917 69 4,494,549 69 4,643,147 71 4,645,097 RTA Contract FR 1,635,377 80 1,713,555 90 1,744,652 79 1,753,518 Banning FR 127,499 s 138,503 5 146,981 5 135,244 Corona FR 153,783 4 163,054 4 169,745 6 168,303 Beaumont FR 164,390 9 190,589 13 198,499 13 204,112 Palo Verde Valley FR 41,945 a 41,745 8 44,432 8 49,673 Public Demand Response 767,883 5% 206 795,503 5% 219 823,649 5% 188 840,811 5% RTA DAR 372,322 125 384,442 105 398,636 98 406,000 Riverside Special Transportation Services DAR 174,058 29 172,725 47 182,878 36 175,276 SunLine DAR 124,720 31 136,208 45 139,042 33 153,183 Corona DAR 61,285 12 65,635 12 68,852 12 66,015 Beaumont DAR 18,786 4 18,710 3 16,899 3 18,640 RTA Taxi 7,648 - 8,539 - 8,271 - 11,963 Banning DAR 9,064 5 9,244 6 9,071 6 9,734 Specialized Transportation/ Universal Call Program [4] 494,516 3% 45 559,104 4% 54 577,736 4% 50 543,296 3% Fixed Route: RTA Extended Services 101,038 108,180 68,726 50,851 RTA Commuter Link 58,466 64,171 62,542 73,635 SunLine Commuter Link 220 - 12,868 14,528 13,952 SunLine Line 95 North Shore - - 26,603 15,605 Paratransit/ Community Shuttle Services: Boys& Girls Club of Southwest County 57,044 13 49,135 16 41,676 14 38,767 Care -A -Van/ HOPE Bus 20,115 10 25,060 12 29,845 13 22,394 Care Connexxus 15,829 4 17,597 5 16,333 5 17,296 City of Norco -Senior Shuttle 1,130 1 2,066 1 1,956 1 2,189 CVAG Roy's Desert Resource Center 38,945 2 46,561 2 45,272 2 17,288 Friends of Moreno Valley MoVan 5,364 1 4,941 1 3,002 1 4,574 Inland AIDS Project 2,377 2 2,354 2 2,342 1,723 Operation Safehouse 524 1 309 1 624 1 765 Riverside County Regional Medical Center 10,071 10 9,208 10 5,835 10 7,640 United States Veterans Initiative - - - 4 5,217 3 2,333 Wildomar Senior Community 440 1 446 - - - - Mileage Reimbursement (one-way trips supported): Court Appointed Special Advocates-CASA/Voices for Children 9,380 6,696 5,702 - TRIP - Partnership to Preserve Independent Living (West County( 82,383 83,831 87,850 89,828 TRIP - Partnership to Preserve Independent Living (East County( - - - 19,779 Bus Passes/Taxi Vouchers/ Van Pool Trips Community Connect/ TAP Bus Pass Trips 65,263 62,742 65,212 71,230 RCTC Commuter benefits/ Coachella Van Pool Trips 19,037 17,700 18,740 - RTA-Travel Training 5,026 39,334 65,354 81,031 SunLine Taxi Voucher Program 2,084 5,905 10,377 12,416 Mobility Management and Travel Training Projects Care Connexxus- Driver Sensitivity Training n/a n/a n/a n/a Community Connect/211 n/a n/a n/a n/a Blindness Support -Travel Training n/a n/a n/a n/a RTA Travel Training n/a n/a n/a n/a ALL TRIPS: Including Rail, Public Transit, Measure AJAR[ and New Freedom 15,255,883 1000,6 szo 15,847,276 100% 653 16,402,422 l00% 544 16,508,554 1a0% TOTAL POPULATION 2,217,778 2,227,577 2,255,059 2,279,967 Trips per Capita for 2006 Total Population (2,005,477 persons) Is/ Trips per Capita for 2012 Total Population Is/ 6.9 Trips per Capita for 2013 Total Population m 7.1 Trips per Capita for 2014 Total Population MI 7.2 Trips per Capita for 2015 Total Population NI 7.2 Notes: [1] Public transit operator ridership data extracted from TransTrack'Table 2 - SRTP Service Summary' on May 10, 2016. Vehicle data reported directly from operators on April 28, 2016. [2] FY13-14 Annualized from average weekday daily boardings at Riverside County stations: Riverside, 91 and Inland Empire -Orange County Lines. FY14-15 Annualized from average weekday AND average weekend daily boardings at Riverside County stations. There is no weekend service on the Riverside line. Reported April 26, 2016. [3] Public bus, fixed route trips for RTA and SunLine do not include Specialized Transportation funded fixed route trips: (RTA Extended, Commuterlink and RTA Travel Training, SunLine CommuterLink and Line 95, and Community Connect TAP/RTA) [4] Specialized Transportation ridership and vehicle data reported directly by specialized transportation operators. RTA and SunLine included in public bus [3] [5] through[9] RCTC Fiscal Year Mid -Year Revenue Projections- Department of Finance January 1st Demographic Research Unit county population estimate. rAm M J PAGE 127 212 riMmo Mcsde (way Tromporlvlion (wlmB[wn Appendix C — Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators RTA Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations INTRA SYSTEM REGIONAL ROUTES 1 3 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 35 40 41 42 49 50 51 52 55 61 74 79 202 204 206 208 210 212 216 �, ,(J 217 L' ¢'�a 4'� � cf G� 0 of 0, o� 2r" `4`� de ?e ,* oe• r, . 1 1 4 4 4 4 5 4 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 1 1 1 2 76 3 1 4 9 8 4 10 4 3 3 5 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 38 11 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 13 12 4 3 5 3 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 38 13 4 3 5 4 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 43 14 4 5 3 4 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 44 15 5 3 6 5 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 41 16 4 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 3 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 45 18 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 19 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 24 20 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 21 21 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 17 22 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 37 23 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 14 24 2 2 1 3 9 26 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 13 27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 33 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 30 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 11 31 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 20 32 2 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 17 33 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 14 35 1 I 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 15 40 1 1 5 41 1 2 2 7 42 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 11 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 50 3 1 1 5 51 4 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 1 17 52 4 1 1 2 1 2 1 12 55 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 14 61 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 15 74 1 1 3 2 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 32 79 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 3 26 202 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 14 204 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 31 206 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 13 208 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 53 210 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 43 212 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 50 216 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 217 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 27 OCTA 794 1 1 1 3 60 4 4 35 12 35 39 39 38 39 14 22 17 16 33 14 9 12 32 18 10 18 17 14 12 5 7 11 17 5 18 11 14 14 30 26 7 23 11 44 32 41 25 22 15 5 28 6 1 17 3 15 2 2 1 31 3 2 1 1 2 1 1062 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intro-S stem 926 Intl -County 20 Regional Rail 52 Region I Bus 64 NOTE: Some routes connect only in one direction, do not necessarily make a meaningful connection an the route's reverse direction. rAmm A PAGE I28 213 `� ikw&ck Count( iro sporkr (ermi n: SunLine Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations as of January 2016 INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL BUS REGIONAL RAIL Routes 14 15 20 24 30 32 53 54 70 80 81 90 91 95 111 °` to ? 2�e a, SO' ..,1**- %S t N. ' a° edo ��� ��� 220 Q 0 P 6 14� 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 15 1 1 1 3 **** 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 24 1 1 1 1 4 30 2 1 2 2 7 32 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 9 53 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 *** 54 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 15 70 1 1 1 3 80 2 3 1 1 1 1 9 81 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 10 90 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 91 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 ** 95 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 111 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 20 * 220 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 7 2 7 3 7 8 5 14 2 9 9 8 8 8 17 5 1 1 3 1 1 8 2 136 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intra-System 114 Intra-Co. 7 Regional Bus 4 Regional Rail 11 136 * Effective date: September 10, 2012 ** Effective date: September 2, 2013 *** Effective date: January 6, 2014 **** Effective date: January 3, 2016 SunLine's Route #220 to the Metrolink station and downtown Riverside supports out -of -county connections to San Bernardino, Los Angeles and San Diego Counties through the host of transfer options afforded at each of these stops. rAmm A PAGE'29 214 `� R�c'side Cony towlines [airaiSSwn Pass Transit Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL BUS REGIONAL RAIL Routes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 `a\eo wets t`� �4, ze x. yah CaJ e-§ c'b 0 y�P a o 1 \ 5a ,,\�' ,1 e'V \c4 . ti L ti61' .3tih PQ> N. ti4 Q`0% \`�E F o°a �°o wp\\ p'V' p'V p"2" PL\ c��� 4, t, c� c, <, % % Q w'a\ 4 �Qp '�° i0 120 'S� '� P� P� P� SJ 4S O� O� O0 O� �P ASP qo 4\e P� 0 •c°wa 11 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 18 2 5 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 25 3 4! 5 3 4 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 26 4 2 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 5 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 15 6 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 16 7 1 2 2 5 9 2 2 2 6 120 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 14 17 16 15 15 7 6 9 7 1 9 9 8 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 150 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intra-System Bus 106 Intra-County Bus 34 Regional Bus 7 Regional Rail/ Intercity Bus 3 150 rAmm A PAGE I30 215 Corona Cruiser Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL RAIL/ INTERCITY BUS Routes Red / �S �,`�o ••xP e�ro Blue 5 � P� o` 7 Red 9 23 3 35 Blue 9 29 5 43 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intra-System 18 Intra-County 52 Regional 8 78 PVVTA Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL RAIL Routes 1 2 3 4 •e �`� V �P ���?� e��� ,�QB' eA 5 � 5 P4` es 1 3 1 2 1 7 2 3 1 2 6 3 1 1 1 3 4 2 2 1 5 5 0 TOTALS 6 6 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 Note: Route 5 is a weekend route and is the only route in operation. No other routes are available to transfer to. Quartzsite Transit Services in Arizona connects paratransit services into Blythe/PVVTA Monday -Friday. rAM M A � � R :crsde (ounly lromporlclion (onntsion PAGE I31 216 r IMmE Rasrside County iroraporidim Commission Appendix D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Three Years Public Transit FY FY FY %Change Vehicles 2012/2013 Di 2013/2014 Di 2014/2015 [2] fromPrior 3-Year History Transit Vehicles only (fixed -route and demand response, excluding taxis) RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Western Riverside County 339 372 382 3% Fixed Route 198 217 227 Demand Response 141 155 155 Coachella Valley 100 104 104 0% Fixed Route 69 69 71 Demand Response 31 35 33 Palo Verde Valley 8 8 8 0% Fixed Route 8 8 8 Countywide Totals 447 484 494 2% [1] Revised reporting from prior year reports; excludes support vehicles. [2] Excludes support vehicles and includes vehicles active as of June 30, 2015 Source: Vehicle information directly reported by operators April 28, 2016. rAm M J 32 217 r ll` R ye Count( TromporIclicr. (or mks'en Appendix E — Inventory of Public and Specialized Transportation Services by Area, by Mode Agency Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Program Description Public Fixed Eligibility General Public Route Providers - Western Service Area Riverside Fare Operating Hours Transfers RTA has transfer agreements with the following agencies: Metrolink, Omnitrans, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Corona Cruiser, SunLine and Pass Transit. Metrolink tickets and P asses are accepted on RTA fixed routes that serve Metrolink stations during period from one hour before to one hour after Metrolink's service hours and are valid on the day of travel. Fare media from Omnitrans, Corona Cruiser and Pass Transit are accepted at transfer locations at the equivalent base fare rate, excluding CommuterLink service, on the day of travel. OCTA fare media is accepted for base fare on Motor Bus (Local, Regional and Community bus) RTA operate 35 regional, local, rural and trolley service routes throughout Western Riverside County and two additional local routes are expected to be added to provide connectivity with the Perris Valley Rail Line, which is due to commence operations in Summer2016. RTA serves eighteen (18) incorporated cities including Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula and Wildomar and unincorporated areas of Western Riverside County. Base Fares: General/Youth (Grades 1-12) - $1.50 Sen/Dis/Medicare/Veteran - $0.70 Child (46" tall or under) - $0.25 Day Pass: General/Youth (Grades 1-12) - $4.00 Sen/Dis/Medicare/Veteran - $2.00 7-Day Pass General/Youth (Grades 1-12) - $16.00 Sen/Dis/Medicare/Veteran-$16.00 30-Day Pass: General-$50.00 Youth (Grades 1-12)-$35.00 Sen/Dis/Medicare/Veteran - $23.00 Start and end times vary from route to route. gale Fares: General/Youth (Grades 1-12) - $3.00 RTA operates eight (8) Sen/Dis/Medicare/Veteran - $2.00 Child (46" tall or under) - $2.00 CommuterLink Route 216 at transfer locations in Orange CommuterLink routes, that are County as well as La Sierra Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) CommuterLink (express bus) long-distance, peak -hour express services that provide both inter and i ntra-county connections. General Public Day Pass: General/Youth (Grades 1-12) - $7.00 Sen/Dis/Medicare/Veteran - $5.00 Start and end times vary from route to route. Metrolink between RTA Route 15 and OCTA Route 794. Current and retired employees as well as dependents of Omnitrans and 30-Day Pass: General/Youth (Grades 1-12)- $75.00 Sen/Dis/Medicare/Veteran - $50.00 OCTA are eligible to ride any local fixed route or CommuterLink in the RTA service area. rAmm A PAGE I33 218 rlEmmi Prersde (nary Tromporlolicn (on�mivan Agency Program Description Public Fixed Eligibility Route Providers - Western Service Area Riverside Fare Operating Hours Transfers City of Corona Corona Cruiser The red and blue lines service the City of Corona with a fixed- route, regularly scheduled bus service. General Public The Blue Line serves the McKinley Street retail area then travels on to Magnolia Avenue and Main Street to the River Road area. The Red Line connects the residential areas of central Corona with commercial areas along Sixth Street and the Ontario Avenue/California Avenue retail area. The Red Line also covers South Corona along Ontario Avenue/TemescalCanyon Road to serve the county area of El Cerrito and The Crossings shopping complex at Cajalco Road/Temescal Canyon Road and The Shops at Dos Lagos on Saturdays. Per Ride: Gen Public/Students: $1.50 Sen/Dis/Medicare: $0.70 Child (Under 46"): $0.25 Day Pass Gen Public/Students: $4.00 Sen/Dis/Medicare: $2.00 15 Day Pass Gen Public: $17.50 Students:$12.25 Sen/Dis/Medicare: $8.05 31 Day Pass Gen Public: $35.00 Students: $24.50 Sen/Dis/Medicare: $16.10 Blue Line Mon - Fri: 6:42 a.m. - 7:09 p.m. Sat: 8:52 a.m. — 3:50 p.m. Red Line Mon - Fri: 6:50 a.m. - 7:05 p.m. Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 5:09 p.m. Sunday no service Corona Cruiser bus routes connect with Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) regional bus routes, North Main Metrolink Commuter Train Station and Park and Ride lots. City of Banning Pass Transit Banning's Pass Transit provides three fixed route services: Routes 1, 5 and 6 General Public The commercial and residential areas of Banning and Cabazon, as well as the commercial areas of the Morongo Indian Reservation and limited commercial areas of Beaumont. Base Fare General: $1.15 -Youth: $1.00 Sen/Dis/Vets: $0.65 - Child: $0.25 Day Pass General: $3.00 - Youth: $3.00 Sen/Dis/Vets: $1.80 - Child: N/A 10-Tripper Punch Pass Youth: $10.00 10-Ticket Book General: $10.35 - Sen/Dis/Vets: $5.85 Monthly Pass General: $36.00 -Youth: $30.00 Sen/Dis/Vets: $21.00 - Child: N/A Transfer/Deviations: $0.25 Military/GoPass/Jury Duty: Free Start and end times vary. The earliest and latest times are as follows: Mon - Fri 4:30AM - 11:00 PM Sat - Sun 8:00 AM- 6:00 PM If you are transferring from an RTA bus you must have purchased their day pass or monthly pass to be able to transfer to Routes 1, 5 & band you will still be required to pay a Zone fare of $.25 to and from Cabazon. When you return back to Sun Lakes Village or Walmart to connect with RTA you will have to pay our fare of $1.15 per person for Routes #1, #Sand #6 plus the $0.25 Zone fare. Passes are accepted from RTA Routes 31 & 35 only at the Albertson's & Wal-Mart transfer points with an additional $0.25 Zone fare if traveling to Cabazon to cross over into the Southeast portion of Cabazon. City of Beaumont Pass Transit Fixed schedule, regional, commuter and special event shuttles General Public Beaumont, Banning, Cherry Valley, and Cabazon. Commuter link service to Calimesa, the Loma Linda Veteran's Hospital and the San Bernardino Metrolink Station. M - F: 6:00 am to 7:30 pm Sat/Sun: 8:00 am to 6:00 pm Passengers can use Day Passes to transfer between the Pass Transit System fixed routes and the RTA Line 31 to Hemet and Line 35 to Moreno Valley. rAmm A PAGE I34 219 r iilllllllr Prerfde Count( Tromporlolicn (onntsion Agency Program Description Public Fixed Route Providers - Coachella Valley Eligibility Service Area Fare Operating Hours Transfers Sun Line Transit Agency SunBus SunLine's local fixed route network (SunBus) currently consists of 15 routes in total, including 14local routes and one (1) commuter link. General Public Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Indio, and Coachella, with service also provided to the unincorporated Riverside County communities of Desert Edge, Thousand Palms, Bermuda Dunes, Thermal, Mecca, Oasis and North Shore. Cash Fare Adult: $1.00; Youth $0.85; Sen/Dis/Med: $0.50 Day Pass Adult: $3.00; Youth $2.00; Sen/Dis/Med: $1.50 31-Day Pass Adult: $34.00; Youth: $24.00; Sen/Dis/Med: $17.00 10-Ride Pass Adult: $10.00; Youth: $8.50; Sen/Dis/Med: $5.00 Employer Pass: $24.00 Commute Exp (CE): Adult $6 - S/D/M $4 CE Day Pass: Adult $14- S/D/M $10 CE 30-Day Pass: Adult $150- S/D/M $100 Weekdays: 4:32 am to 11:23 pm Weekends: 4:55 am to 10:48 Pm System transfers between routes are $0.25 Agency Program Description Public Fixed Route Providers - Palo Verde Valley Eligibility Service Area Fare Operating Hours Transfers Palo Verde Valley Transit Desert Roadrunner PVVTA provides five deviated fixed routes. General Public Within the City of Blythe, and the unincorporated Riverside County areas of Mesa Verde and Ripley. Also, part of the greater area is the California State prison facilities of Ironwood and Chuckawal la. Cash Fare Gen Public: $1.65 Sen/Dis: %so Child (5 & under): 1st child Free AZ fare to/from Ehrenberg: $5.00 Route 3 Fare: $3.30 Route Deviations: $0.80 10 Ride Punch Passes Gen Pub: $16.50, Sen/Dis: $8.00 Ehrenberg, AZ: $50.00, Route 3: $33.00 31-Day Pass Gen Pub: $43.00, Sen/Dis: $28.00 Route 3: $120.00 X-Tend-A-Ride: $5.00 M-F: 5:00 am to 6:30 pm 8:00 am to 1:00 pm on Saturday and limited holidays N/A rAmm A PAGE I35 220 rIMmn Prerfde (ocnly Traraporlolicn Commission Agency Program Public Demand Response Providers - Western Riverside Description Eligibility Service Area Fare Reservations Operating Hours Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Priority DAR Service ADA Priority DAR is an origin - to -destination advanced reservation transportation service that RTA gives priority service to individuals who are certified under ADA law. Persons who are certified under ADA law to have a disability that prohibits them from using fixed - route service. Persons who are ADA certified are eligible for trips throughout the RTA service area that are within three- quarters of a mile of a fixed route bus service, excluding express routes. Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Senior/Disabled DAR Service Senior/Disabled DAR is an origin -to -destination advanced reservation transportation service within a single city. Seniors age 65 and above and persons with disabilities. Seniors age 65 and above and persons with disabilities are eligible for local DAR service within a single city and within three-quarters of a mile excluding express service. Transportation is provided only within the city in which the trip begins. Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Dial -a -Ride Plus, RTA Lifeline Service Two-year pilot program approved under the RCTC Measure A Call for Projects, provide wheelchair accessible taxi service. Seniors aged 65 and over and to persons with disabilities for lifeline services. Extends the DAR service boundary by an additional two miles. Base Fare* Sen/Dis: $3.00 Medicare: $3.00 child (under46"): $0.50 10-Ticket Book Sen/Dis: $30.00 Medicare: $30.00 Child (Under46"): N/A Buddy Fare A special program, for two to 10eligible customers can share the fare for each fare zone. The entire group must be picked up within a half -mile radius of each other and travel to the same destination. *Base fare is per fare zone for a maximum of $9.00. Personal care attendants pay the same fare as the rider. Dial -A -Ride customers may schedule rides one to three days in advance. Dial -A -Ride requests are taken Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. and weekends from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. (800) 795-7887 or TTY (800) 396-3610 DAR service is provided at times equivalent to local fixed route bus service in the area. During the hours of fixed route bus service operation. During the hours of fixed route bus service operation. rAmm A PAGE I36 221 r I` Rrrem:de (nonOr TrompmriMims Commission Agency City of Corona Program ADA Complimentary Paratransit Public Demand Description Curb -to -curb paratransit service. Door-to-door service is available if driver can see the vehicle at all times and vehicle is parked in a safe place. Response Eligibility Persons who are certified under ADA law with a disability that prohibits them from using fixed- route service. Providers - Western Service Area Riverside Fare Person w Disability: $2.50 Children: $0.50 Reservations Reservations can be made from one to fourteen days in advance; however, same day service maybe accommodated if space is available. (951) 734-7220 Operating Hours Mon - Fri: 6:42 am - 6:00 pm Sat: 8:52 am - 5:09 pm Sunday no service Throughout the City of Corona and neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). City of Corona General Public Paratransit Curb -to -curb paratransit service. Door-to-door service is available if driver can see the vehicle at all times and vehicle is parked in a safe place. General Public General Public: $4.00 Sen/Dis/Med: $2.50 Children: $0.50 Mon -Fri: 6:42 am - 7:09 pm Sat: 8:52 am - 5:09 pm Sunday no service City of Riverside Special Transit Origin -to -destination rideshare transportation service. Limited to senior citizens (60+) and persons with disabilities (w/ physician doc). Within the 81.54square mile incorporated city limits of the City of Riverside. $2.00fora one-way ride; a punch card may be purchased for $40.00 and is equivalent to 20 rides. Call (951) 687-8080 M-F 8:CO am - 5:00 pm, 9:00 am -3:00 pm Wknd/Holidays Mon - Fri: 8:00 am - 5:30 pm Wknd/Holiday 9:00 am - 4:00 pm City of Banning Dial -A -Ride Origin -to -destination shared ride transportation service. Senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for ADA transport. City of Banning and neighboring areas of Beaumont and Cabazon Base Fare One-way: $2.00 Companion: $3.00 No -Show: $2.00 PCA: Free 10-Ride Punch Card One-way: $18.00 Call (951) 922-3252 Reservations must be made no later than 3 p.m. the day of the trip. Mon - Fri: 8:00 am to 3:00 pm ADA Riders: Mon - Fri: 6 am to 6:45 pm Sat/Sun: 8 am to 4:45 pm (must have 3-ADA certified passengers in order to transport on Sat/Sun) City of Beaumont Dial -A -Ride Origin -to -destination shared ride transportation service. Senior citizens (65+), persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for ADA transport. Beaumont and parts of Cherry Valley Call (951) 769-8532 at least 24 hours in advance to make a reservation Monday through Sunday 8:OOa.m. to 6:00 p.m. ADA Certified Mon - Fri: 6.00 am to 7.00 pm Sat/Sun: 8:00 am to 6:00 pm (ADA only on Sunday) rAmm A PAGE I37 222 lllllllrlEmn Prerfde Count( Tromporidion (onmis on Public Demand Response Providers - Coachella Valley Agency SunLine Transit Agency Program SunDial Description Curb -to -curb service designed to meet requirements of the ADA and next -day complementary demand -response service to Coachella Valley residents who are unable to use fixed route service. Eligibility Service Area Fare Cash Fare -Single Ride Same City: $1.50 City to City: $2.00 10-Ride Pass Same City: $15.00 City to City: $20.00 Reservations (800) 347-8628 seven days a week between 8am and 5 pm Operating Hours SunDial operates the same hours as any specific SunBus fixed - route. Certified riders that have the required ADA Certification Identification Card Within %mile of the existing SunBus route network SunLine Transit Agency SunTaxi Subsidized taxi service to supplement SunDial in providing ADA paratransit service. Certified riders that have the required ADA Certification Identification Card Within %mile of the existing SunBus route network N/A Bring a completed Taxi Voucher Program Application to 32- 505 Harry Oliver Trail, Thousand Palms, CA, Monday through Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. SunLine Transit Agency Taxi Vouchers Providing half price taxi trips. Seniors (60+) and the disabled Throughout SunLine service area Loading onto a prepaid taxi fare payment card up to $75 every 30 days. SunLine then doubles the deposit. Maximum balance allowed on a card at any time is $450.00 Taxi Smart Card is accepted by all three Coachella Valley taxicab franchises; American Cab, Desert City Cab and Yellow Cab of the Desert. Taxis are equipped with a reader to accept the Smart Card. Swipe your Smart Card to pay your fare. A standard tip is paid in cash. Taxi Smart Cards cannot be used for tips. For more information call (760) 343-3456. Public Demand Response Providers - Palo Verde Valley Agency Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency rAmm A Program Road Runner Description ADA Para -transit is also provided after hours on the Fixed Routes through route deviation requests. The routes can deviate up to 3/4of a mile away from the actual mapped routes. Eligibility General Public Service Area Within the City of Blythe, and the unincorporated Riverside County areas of Mesa Verde and Ripley. Also, part of the greater area is the California State prison facilities of Ironwood and Chuckawalla. Fare Route deviations are $0.80 in addition to the normal fixed -route fare. DV8 Card that provides 8 one-way deviations is $6.40 Reservations Request a deviation by calling 760-922-1140. Deviation requests should be made at least 30 minutes prior to the p/u time. Deviations can also be requested from the driver at least 30 minutes prior to the p/u or d/o time. Operating Hours Mon - Fri: 5:00 am to 6:30 pm 8:00 am to 1:00 pm on Saturday and limited holidays PAGE I38 223 rlEmn Prersde Count( Trompoftion (onrmksicn Service Provider Ability Counts Service Description Transportation from Ability Counts site to client job site. Specialized Transit Providers Days Cities Served Operating - Western Where to Call (951)734-6595 Riverside Who Qualifies Persons with developmental disabilities. Units of Service Provided 134,000 Annual Trips Funding Sources 5310 Traditional Western Riverside County and part of San Bernardino County. M-Sat Blindness Support (Travel Training program) Provides persons blind/visually impaired/disabled with the skills and knowledge to use the local fixed -route bus system. Western Riverside County. M-F (951) 341-9244 Adults that are legally blind, disabled,55years or older or a veteran. Trains 701ndividuals and Distributes 180 Bus Passes Annually MeasureA- Specialized Transit Boys &Girls Clubs of Southwest County Children receive round trip transportation to school and back to their clubhouse. Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Wildomar, Menifee. M-F (951)699-1526 Elementary and Middle School low-income family youths participating in the Before and After School Transportation program. 38,767Annual Trips MeasureA - Specialized Transit Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. Provides door-to-door non -emergency transportation. Hemet/San Jacinto Valley, Lake Elsinore area and the Sun City/Menifee area; unincorporated county areas of Winchester and Val Vista. M-F (951) 791-3572 Low-income, seniors and disabled individuals including: Riverside County Hemet Service Center customers, Valley Restart Homeless Shelter, Da Vita, Riverside Co. Office on Aging, Ki nCare, Job Training and Education through HOPE Bus, Care Connexxus, Inland Regional, and Veteran Services. 22,394 Annual Trips MeasureA- Specialized Transit/ 5310 Traditional Care Connexxus, Inc. Provides specialized curb -to -curb paratransit non -emergency medical transportation. City of Riverside and surrounding cities. M-F (951) 509-2500 Clients of Adult Day Service Center of Riverside County. 17,296 Annual Trips MeasureA - Specialized Transit/ 5310 Traditional Community Connect Transit Access Program (TAP) Bus transit tokens/tickets are distributed to human services agencies to give to their clients to fulfill emergency need transportation. Public Transit Providers in Western Riverside County. M-F (951)686-4402 Seniors, persons with disabilities, and low- income. Distributes 71,230 Bus passes to14,956 Persons Annually MeasureA - Specialized Transit Community Connect 2-1-1 Vet Link Provides a Veterans Specialist call taker for 2-1-1 information calls and an online trip planner for providers in Riverside County. Riverside County -wide. 24 hours Dial 2-1-1 www.211VetLink.o rg Focus on Veterans, but open to General Public. 2,005 Mobility Management Contacts MeasureA - Specialized Transit/Veterans Transportation and Community Living EXCEED (Valley Resource Center) Provides transportation related activities and services beyond those required by ADA by providing door-to-door service allowing travel to work and/or day program. Hemet/San Jacinto Valley; unincorporated county areas of Winchester and Valle Vista. M-F (951) 766-8659 Adults with disabilities who are clients of EXCEED (a division of Valley Resource Center for the Retarded, Inc.). 198,000 Annual Trips 5310 Traditional & Expanded rAmm A PAGE I39 224 r Illllmn Pre33;cle Count( Trompnrlclion (wamksicn Service Provider Service Description Specialized Transit Cities Served Providers Days Operating - Western Where to Call Riverside Who Qualifies Units of Service Provided Funding Sources Forest Folk, Inc. (Idyllwild Area Shuttle) Provides a shuttle service in Idyl lwild and its surrounding communities and lifeline service to and from Hemet and Palm Desert. Communities of Idyllwild, Pine Cove, Fern Valley, and Mountain Center. M-F (951) 292-8467 Seniors, persons with disabilities, and low- income. Began FY 15-16; Projecting2,700 Annual Trips MeasureA- Specialized Transit Friends of Moreno Valley Senior Center (a.k.a. "MoVan") Paratransit service for travel within Moreno Valley and outride of Moreno Valley for doctor appointments. Trips originating in Moreno Valley to areas within a 35-mile radius. M-F (800) 351-6571 Seniors (60+) and adults with disabilities. 4,574 Annual Trips MeasureA - Specialized Transit/ 5310 Traditional Independent Living Partnership (TRIP) Provides a mileage reimbursement for volunteer drivers of eligible participants. Western Riverside County 24 hours (800) 510-2020 Seniors and persons with disabilities. 89,828 Annual Trips; 1,344,778 Miles Reimbursed MeasureA - Specialized Transit Inland AIDS Project Door-to-door non -emergency medical transportation to medical and dental appointments. Western Riverside County M-F (951) 683-2427 x136 Clients with HIV/AIDS. 1,723 Annual Trips MeasureA- Specialized Transit City of Norco, Dept of Parks & Recreation Door-to-door transportation through the Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center. Norco, Mira Loma M-TH (951) 270-5647 Norco residents: seniors and persons with disabilities. 2 189 Annual trips MeasureA - Specialized Transit Operation Safehouse, Inc. Provides transportation through screened volunteers to social service appointments. Western Riverside County 24 hours (951) 369-4921 Homeless, at -risk youth ages 18-21. 765 Annual Trips MeasureA - Specialized Transit Riverside University Health Systems —Behavioral Health Door-to-door transportation non- emergency medical transportation. Western Riverside County Mon - Fri (951)955-1647 Low-income or elderly individuals with behavioral health issues. Began FY 15-16; Projecting1,000 Annual Trips MeasureA - Specialized Transit Riverside University Health Systems —Medical Transportation Department (Formerly RCRMC). Door-to-door transportation non- emergency medical and dialysis transportation. Western Riverside County Mon -Fri - NEMT Sat/Sun- Dialysis (866) 909-4881 (951) 486-4380 Low-income Med i -Cal and Medicare clients of the RUHS Medical Center, outside Dialysis patients, the elderly and disabled. 7,640 Annual Trips Measure A- Specialized Transit United States Veterans Initiative Door-to-door transportation for March ARB residents to critical appointments. Riverside County M-F (951) 656-6892 Low-income and/or homeless Veterans residing onsite at March Air Reserve Base as well as offsite areas located in Riverside County. 2,333 Annual Trips Measure A- Specialized Transit Voices for Children Provides mileage reimbursement to Court Appointed Special Advocate's to transport children that pass through Riverside County's foster care system to court, school, appointments and outings. Western Riverside County M-F (858)598-2211 Children placed in the juvenile dependency court system (foster children) in Western Riverside County. Began inFY15-16; Projecting2,850 Annual Trips MeasureA- Specialized Transit rAmm A PAGE I40 225 r I` Prerfde Count( Tromporlolicn (ommkskn Specialized Transit Service Provider Service Description Specialized Transit Cities Served Providers Days Operating - Coachella Where to Call Valley Who Qualifies Units of Service Provided Funding Sources Angel View, Inc. Transportation to and from Angel View day program. Transportation is provided to residential clients 7 days a week; Day Program clients. Coachella Valley/Joshua Tree M-SU (760) 329-6471 Children and adults with disabilities who are clients of Angel View's residential care program and Adult Day Program. 32,000Annual Trips FTA5310 Traditional & Expanded Desert Arc Operates a bus and van service that provides daily transportation and para- transit services to facility and work sites. Coachella Valley and the Morongo Basin M-Su (888) 771-7784 Persons with developmental disabilities. 161,000 Annual Trips FTA5310 Traditional Desert Blind and Handicapped Association Door -through -door transportation design to help clients be a ble to remain in their privatehomes and fully participate in the community and local economy. Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, and Desert Hot Springs, includingmuch of the intervening unincorporated areas. M-F (760)969-5025 Individuals with a disability that prevents safe driving. The disability may be permanent or temporary such as out- patient surgery or a cast. Project is still being implemented.Projecting FTA 5310 Traditional & Expanded Independent Living Partnership TRIP p( ) Provides a mileage reimbursement for volunteer drivers of eligible participants. g p P Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valle(Blythe)24 y hours (800) 510-2020 Seniors and persons with disabilities. 19,779 Annual Trips; 297,578 Miles Reimbursed FTA5310 Expanded Salud Health Clinic Provides volunteer transportation for healthcare clinic patients on an as -needed basis when space and volunteer driver are available to provide the service. Trips outside of the Blythe area When capacity is available (800)510-2021 Any patient of the clinic Not available Clinic Funds rAmm A PAGE I41 226 AGENDA ITEM 8M RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislation Update BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt the following bill position — AB 2452 (Gatto) — Oppose. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State Update AB 2452 (Gatto) — Staff Recommended: OPPOSE This bill would require Caltrans or a regional transportation agency such as the Commission demonstrate that it considered reversible lanes for any road capacity -increasing project submitted for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Reversible lanes are used in California on the Golden Gate Bridge, the Interstate 15 in San Diego, and the San Diego -Coronado Bridge. When used, reversible lanes have the benefit of alleviating congestion during peak periods by adding capacity to the direction of travel that is in highest demand while reducing capacity for the direction of travel that is underutilizing the lane. Reversing the lane maximizes the throughput of the existing corridor, reducing the need to add lanes and expand the footprint of the facility. However, in many corridors, both directions of travel experience high volumes of traffic during peaks, rendering reversible lanes an unattractive and ineffective option. Design and geometrics of roadways can also inhibit implementation of reversible lanes. AB 2542 would statutorily require one option that has limited applicability to be emphasized. Commission staff believes it is unwise to legislate specific design features of projects to be considered and encouraged. These types of details should not be micromanaged by the Legislature, but rather be guided by professional Caltrans and industry best practices. Agenda Item 8M 227 While the goal of seeking to reduce the environmental footprint of highways is a worthy one, staff believes a bill such as this opens the door to legislatively -mandated checklists of items for project sponsors to consider. State Budget Update Governor Brown signed the FY 2016/17 State Budget into law on June 27. The Commission's legislative advocate has written a detailed memorandum containing details on the budget's impact to transportation programs and policy, which is attached. Federal Legislation Update Federal Discretionary Grants Within the last month, the Commission's Multimodal Services Department submitted two significant grant applications to the U.S. Department of Transportation. In partnership with the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency, Palo Verde Hospital, and community partners, the Commission applied for a $199,194 grant from the Federal Transit Administration for the Blythe Wellness Express, a program to provide transportation options for residents of the Palo Verde Valley to access medical and healthcare services not available within the community. This effort received strong support from Riverside County's legislative delegation; efforts remain underway to advocate for this federal funding which will provide meaningful access to healthcare in Riverside County's most eastern sub -region. The Commission also applied for an advanced technology grant from the Federal Highway Administration to create an Integrated Corridor Management System on State Route 91 through the cities of Corona and Riverside. This project is a partnership between the Commission, Caltrans, and the two cities to fully integrate and synchronize signals along the corridor, provide increased deployment of changeable message signs on the highway, and develop a next -generation IE 511 mobile app to provide multimodal (bus, rail, toll) real-time traveler information on SR-91. Staff will continue to work with the region's Congressional delegation to pursue these funds. In congruence with the RCTC Strategic Assessment adopted by the Commission, the Multi - Modal Services and Government Relations teams will continue to actively pursue discretionary state and federal grants to address Riverside County's mobility challenges. Attachments: 1) Legislative Matrix 2) Smith, Watts and Hartmann Memorandum Dated June 27, 2016 Agenda Item 8M 228 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION —June 2016 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 4 (Linder) This bill would bring truck weight fees back to transportation accounts and would prohibit weight fee revenues from being transferred from the State Highway Account to the Transportation Debt Service Fund, the Transportation Bond Direct Payment Account, or any other fund or account for the purpose of payment of the debt service on transportation general obligation bonds, and would also prohibit loans of weight fee revenues to the General Fund. Died pursuant to Article IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution. (January 1, 2016) SUPPORT 3/11/15 AB 194 (Frazier) This bill provides a uniform, less -political process for tolling projects to be reviewed and approved by the state. Today, each tolling project must be approved via a bill in the Legislature. AB 194 provides the California Transportation Commission (CTC) with the authority to review and approve tolling projects, subject to specified conditions that provide for public transparency and collaboration between state and regional governments. The most important aspect of this bill is it rests decision -making authority over tolling projects with the governmental entity financially responsible for the project. The bill is sponsored by the Self -Help Counties Coalition, of which the Commission is a member. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State —Chapter 687, Statutes of 2015. (October 9, 2015). SUPPORT 3/11/15 AB 218 (Melendez) This bill allows for the relinquishment from state to local control of State Route 74 in the area between the cities of Lake Elsinore and Perris. This bill is sponsored by the county of Riverside and is championed by First District Supervisor and Commissioner Kevin Jeffries. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State —Chapter 553, Statutes of 2015. (October 7, 2015). SUPPORT 3/11/15 AB 914 (Brown) AB 914 authorizes San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to implement tolling on Interstate 10 and Interstate 15 within the County of San Bernardino. The bill contains language that requires cooperative agreements between SANBAG and the Commission prior to construction commencing on SANBAG's I-15 project. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State —Chapter 702, Statutes of 2015. (October 9, 2015). SUPPORT 4/08/15 229 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 1171 (Linder) This bill authorizes the widespread use of an alternative contracting method known as construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) for projects not on the state highway system. Like design -build, CM/GC offers a streamlined private sector risk -transfer in project delivery that is capable of saving time and money on complex transportation projects. In short, CM/GC allows a project sponsor (such as the Commission) to enter into a preconstruction contract with a private entity to provide services that assist in preparing a design and schedule for the project, while reserving the option to allow that contractor to bid on the actual construction of the project. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State —Chapter 413, Statutes of 2015. (October 1, 2015). SUPPORT 4/08/15 AB 1569 (Steinorth) This bill provides an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for inspection, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, or removal of transportation projects, such as highways,roads bridges, culverts tunnels,Reconsideration p p J g transit systems, bike, and walkways. Auxiliary lane additions also qualify for the exemption if it is within existing right of way and the areas surrounding the right of way are returned to their original condition after the project is complete. Although these projects are exempted from CEQA, the project sponsor must still notify public agencies with authority over the project and comply with any local laws. These projects are not exempted from the Porter - Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the California Endangered Species Act, and other state and federal laws. In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage. granted. (April 4, 2016). SUPPORT 4/13/16 AB 1780 (Medina) This bill, beginning in the 2016-17 fiscal year, would continuously appropriate 25 percent of the annual proceeds of the fund to the California Transportation Commission for the Sustainable Trade Corridors Program, which the bill would establish, thereby making an appropriation. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. (April 20, 2016). In committee: Held under submission. (May 27, 2016). SUPPORT 3/09/16 AB 1833 (Linder) This bill seeks three distinct policies that would create greater efficiencies in delivering transportation projects: Create an advanced mitigation program at Caltrans similar in concept to Riverside County's Multiple -Species Habitat Conservation Plan; remove the sunset date on California's participation in the federal program that allows the State to assume responsibility for review of federal environmental documents; and authorizes the State to participate in the new pilot program that allows States to substitute state environmental laws, such as the CEQA in lieu of NEPA. In committee: Held under submission. (May 27, 2016). SUPPORT 3/09/16 230 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 1943 (Linder) This bill provides technical amendments to a previous bill sponsored by the Commission in 2014, SB 953 (Roth) providing the Commission with authority to establish parking regulations at its rail stations. Legislature edits to the bill's language prevented the Commission from enforcing parking regulations. AB 1943 clarifies the law with its amendments and provides the Commission with the power to establish and enforce its rules. The bill also allows the Commission to use a third -party private party to cite and tow violators. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re -refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re -referred to Com. on T. & H. (June 8, 2016). SPONSOR 3/09/16 AB 2014 (Melendez) This bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol, in coordination with the Department of Transportation and in consultation with regional and local entities, to complete a workload study to assess resource needs to supervise existing and expanded freeway service patrols identified by regional and local entities and to submit the study to the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Assembly Committee on Budget. The bill would also require the departments to prepare their annual budget requests to the Legislature to accommodate the Department of the California Highway Patrol's oversight of increased freeway service patrols identified in the study. In committee: Held under submission.. (May 27, 2016). SPONSOR 3/09/16 AB 2170 (Frazier) This bill is similar to AB 1780 (Medina) in that it directs new sources of funding to the successful TCIF program. AB 2170 directs federal formula funding for goods movement into the TCIF program. The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, approved by Congress in 2015, creates a new formula funding program for freight projects. The funds are apportioned to the states. This bill ensures that funding is distributed equitably throughout the state where regional governments such as the Commission will have a voice at the table. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re -refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re -referred to Com. on T. & H. (June 9, 2016). SUPPORT 3/09/16 AB 2452 (Quirk) This bill proposes a helpful reform to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that would limit the exposure of transportation projects to delays and costly litigation. AB 2452 by East Bay Assemblyman Bill Quirk would prohibit a judge from stopping the construction or implementation of a transportation project on solely on the basis of the project's potential contributions to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. From committee: Be re- referred to Com. on A. & A.R. Re -referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re -referred to Com. on A. & A.R. (April 14, 2016). SUPPORT 3/09/16 231 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 2783 (E. Garcia) This bill directs the Strategic Growth Council (SGC) to amend the guidelines for the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program. The AHSC program is funded from Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds (GGRF), otherwise known as cap and trade. AB 2783 allows projects in rural areas to meet lower housing density thresholds more consistent with rural development patterns. Current guidelines place rural areas of Riverside County at a competitive disadvantage for AHSC funding because Riverside County and the cities surrounding local rural areas are considered urban or suburban by the current program guidelines. Urban and suburban areas are required to have housing densities higher than what the market will typically support in a rural area. Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and E.Q. (June 2, 2016). SUPPORT IN CONCEPT, SEEK AMENDMENTS 4/13/16 SB 39 (Pavley) This bill raises the maximum number of green stickers issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which allow those vehicles to travel in high -occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes regardless of the number of occupants. SB 39 raises the cap to 85,000.. This bill represents a 112 percent increase in green stickers over a two-year period. The green sticker program expires on January 1, 2019. Referred to Com. On TRANS. (May 22, 2015). OPPOSE 6/10/15 SB 321 (Beall) This bill allows the BOE to adjust the price -based excise tax using a five-year forecast period instead of just a one-year period, thereby reducing the impact of short-term disruptions in fuel prices. SB 321 also extends the revenue- neutrality requirement to cover a three-year period instead of just one year, offering another opportunity for the BOE to smooth -out dramatic revenue swings. Finally, the bill allows the BOE to adjust the price -based excise tax every quarter, rather than once per year. Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Beall. (September 11, 2015). SUPPORT 3/11/15 SB 885 (Wolk) Sponsored by the American Council of Engineering Companies, this bill would significantly increase litigation and financial exposure for entities that contract with design professionals by limiting the contractor's duty to defend claims against their projects. By forbidding project owners from requiring design professionals to defend litigation against projects on which they worked, SB 885 will cause project owners to stand-in to defend the contractor's work and then retroactively seek compensation from the contractor if the design professional is found at fault. The bill would create legal special treatment for a certain type of company, leading to inequity in who is responsible for defending lawsuits. The Commission relies heavily on the private sector for design services, which provides many benefits to the Commission, including, but not limited to: cost savings, efficiencies, and risk transfer. SB 885 would diminish these benefits of contracting for design services by requiring Riverside County taxpayers to accept the costs and risks of defending a private contractor's work and then initiating further litigation to recoup those costs from the contractor. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 4.) Ordered to the Assembly. (June 1, 2016). In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. (June 2, 2016). Referred to Com. on JUD. (June 9, 2016). OPPOSE 5/23/16 L3L Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption SB 901 (Bates) This bill creates an advanced mitigation program at Caltrans to account for the future impacts on the environment from transportation projects. This concept is similar to Riverside County's Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and the California Transportation Commission's annual report recommendations to the Legislature. SB 901 is similar to AB 1833 (Linder), which the Commission took action to support in March 2016, and is consistent with the Commission's legislative platform which encourages policies that expedite projects and reduce costs. SB 901 is slightly different in that it calls for $30 million to be taken from the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and State Highway Operations Preservation and Protection (SHOPP) program to pay for the advanced mitigation program. Set for hearing April 19. (March 30, 2016). April 19 hearing postponed by committee. (April 14, 2016). SUPPORT 4/13/16 SB 1197 (Cannella) This bill allows for the expansion of intercity passenger rail service beyond the boundaries of the three existing joint powers authorities (JPAs) that operate intercity rail service today. Current law establishes the Los Angeles -San Diego- San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) JPA and authorizes the state to contract with the JPA to operate the popular Pacific Surfliner Amtrak route. The Commission is a member agency of the LOSSAN JPA. This bill would provide the opportunity for the future Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass intercity rail corridor to be operated by LOSSAN. While the governance of the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass service has not been fully vetted at this point in time, SB 1197 creates an opportunity that could be utilized in the future if it is determined by the Commission and the other LOSSAN member agencies it is best to incorporate the new corridor into the existing JPA, rather than creating a new agency or allowing Caltrans Division of Rail to operate the service. Set for hearing April 19, 2016. (March 30, 2016). SUPPORT 4/13/16 H.R. 2497 (Denham) H.R. 2497 creates a program to be administered by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation that eliminates duplicative environmental reviews and approvals of transportation projects under state and federal laws. Importantly, the bill sets a 90-day deadline for the Secretary to render a decision on applications for the program. Referred to House subcommittee on Highway and Transit. (May 22, 2015). Referred to House subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment. (May 22, 2015). SUPPORT 9/9/15 H.R. 4441 Reauthorization of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), known as the Aviation Innovation, Reform, and Reauthorization Act Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 34 - 25. (February 11, 2016). SEEK AMENDMENTS 3/09/16 233 ATTACHMENT 2 Smith, Watts & Hartmann Consulting and Governmental Relations June 28, 2016 MEMORANDUM FROM: Mark Watts SUBJECT: State Budget Actions Affecting Transportation Late yesterday the governor approved the 2016-17 State Budget after both houses acted on the package on June 15t". This includes both the 2016-17 state budget act and several of the key related trailer bills sent to the Governor. have summarized key budgetary items affecting transportation programs acted upon as reflected in the budget, as well as highlighted issues relegated to the transportation budget trailer bills, AB 1610 and SB 838. These two nearly identical trailer bills remain in the Legislature due to a disagreement between the houses on one provision related to HOV Lane Access. The Assembly has approved SB 838 and returned it to the Senate, while AB 1610 was approved by the Senate and returned the Assembly. However, neither house has yet to consider the bill before them on a concurrence approval vote. CAP AND TRADE Due to the lower -than -expected auction revenues in the May auction, decisions on Cap and Trade programmatic funding have been deferred by leadership until after June 15, 2016. As a consequence, only a very modest amount of funds will be appropriated to state agencies for program administration purposes. The balance of the $1.4 billion unspent since last year will be reserved for further discussion in August. This extra time will allow for more analysis of the amounts of revenue potentially available for appropriation in the budget year. 925 L Street, Suite 220 . Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 446-5508 . Fax: (916) 446-1499 234 TRANSPORTATION Key Budget Actions, 2016-17 • Governor's Transportation Budget Proposal. The subcommittees in both houses shifted the Governor's proposed $3.6 billion transportation funding and reform package back to the policy process and removed those provisions from the budget package. As a consequence, the governor's funding package has not been addressed. • I I IIrade Corridor Federal Funding. The subcommittees rejected the Governor's proposed trailer bill language to establish a new trade corridor program to allocate new federal funds the State has received from the recently enacted federal FAST Act. AB 2170 (Frazier) addresses this matter now and discussions are under way with the Administration. The bill is set for hearing tomorrow in the Senate Environmental Quality committee. • 1 I-ederal Trade Grant Program. Both subcommittees approved provisional language to allow the CTC to allocate federal and state capital funds to match grant funds as necessary in order to take advantage of any federal FASTLANE grants awarded to the State of California for Caltrans nominated projects. The appropriate trailer bill language is contained in both AB 1610 and SB 838. • State Transit Assistance Allocation Falls. Due to lower fuel prices anticipated for 2016-17 continuing to be lower than earlier projected, the STA state-wide allocation is down $48.3 million, or 15.3%, compared to the original January State Budget. Originally estimated to be $315 million for the budget year, new projections indicate the amount will be $267 million. •FTIState Transit Assistance "Fix': The budget conferees adopted Trailer Bill Language to overturn a recent reinterpretation of current law that has resulted in a reallocation of existing funding in the State Transit Assistance program to an expanded base of transit entities. The appropriate language is contained in both AB 1610 and SB 838. 2 235 " [Erapital Outlay Support at Caltrans. The budget adjusts overall Capital Outlay Support baseline staffing within the department, resulting in a reduction in overall staffing by 94 positions. This adjustment reflects the changes to the program as a result of the status quo level of revenue. Contained in main Budget Bill, SB 826. " capital Support Related to Governor's Transportation Package. Both subcommittees rejected the Administration's proposed Capital Outlay Support cost supplement of $155.5 million and 877 positions, intended to reflect the workload needs expected from adopting the Governor's Transportation package. " 1 I ere -Prop 42 Loans. A surprise addition to the budget trailer bills, not discussed in the committee process, this new proposal approves trailer bill language that allows the transfer of tribal gaming revenues to the General Fund in the event that the State repays Traffic Congestion Relief Fund debts earlier than anticipated. Contained in both AB 1610 and SB 838. Other Transportation Budget Actions " Provides S3 million of additional Public Transportation Account funds to support expanded transportation research at the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies. " I Approves S4.6 million federal funds and 26 positions toconduct bridge load ratings, with reporting language requested by the Legislative Analyst's Office. " Approves an increase of $1 million federal funds and five positions for federally required oversight for consultant contracts, directing the Local Assistance Program to implement a risk -based monitoring program. " I Transfers Toll Collection Services from the Traffic Operations Program to the Maintenance Program to consolidate resources, improve departmental efficiencies, and provide flexibility for the operation of toll collection services during peak commute travel times. 3 236 " I Approves the reappropriation of Budget Act 2010 HigliSpeed Rail Passenger Train Bond Funds (Proposition 1A) to allow the completion of two local assistance projects and one capital outlay project for Positive Train Control. This reappropriation is for liquidation of current contracts only. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES " TERegistration Fee Increase. Includes an increase in the Motor Vehicle Fee by $10 per vehicle to address a structural imbalance in the Motor Vehicle Account. The base $43 fee, and now, the additional $100 fee, is indexed. This raises about $300 million, initially, and is contained in both AB 1610 and SB 838. " HOV Stickers. One of the Budget Trailer Bills, SB 838, includes provisions to remove the 85,000 cap on Green stickers and continues the existing HOV Green and White decal programs to 2019. However, AB 1610 does not include this language, and at present is considered the likely transportation budget trailer bill. 4 237 AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Status of Interest Rate Swaps Integrated with 2009 Variable Rate Demand Bonds BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file a status report on the two interest rate swaps that are integrated with the 2009 Sales Tax Variable Rate Demand Bonds (2009 Bonds); 2) Direct staff to continue to evaluate financing options related to interest rate swaps integrated with the 2009 Bonds; and 3) Approve an increase of $11,100,000 in FY 2016/17 Budget expenditures related to debt service and professional costs. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2006, due to the uncertainty of future interest rates in connection with anticipated long-term debt issuances related to the 2009 Measure A, staff and its financial advisor, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates (Fieldman), recommended an interest rate swap strategy to insulate the Commission's 2009 Measure A financing program against future interest rate volatility. In July 2006, following a presentation on the swap strategy that included an overview of the incremental risks assumed, the Commission authorized the execution of swap transaction documents with the successful counterparties. In late August 2006, following a bid process, the interest rate swap agreements were awarded to Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America) and Lehman Brothers Derivative Products, Inc. (LBDP) for $100 million and $85 million, respectively. These swaps were forward -starting interest rate swaps to become effective at a date three years in the future, on October 1, 2009, when the Commission anticipated issuance of at least $185 million of variable rate long-term debt to refinance the commercial paper program. The swaps provided that the Commission would receive 67 percent of one month LIBOR (generally equivalent to the rate on floating rate bonds) and would pay 3.679 percent to the counterparty on the outstanding, or notional, amount. Agenda Item 9 238 In May 2008, the Commission authorized the issuance of bonds to refinance outstanding commercial paper; the commercial paper program was established in March 2005. The Commission issued $126,395,000 of bonds in June 2008 (2008 Bonds) with the intent to refinance them with a bond issuance in October 2009. During the financing of the 2008 Bonds, staff and Fieldman provided a report on the credit market environment resulting from the credit crisis and the reliance on sub -prime mortgages for the U.S. housing market. The environment had significantly affected municipal bond insurers, the demand for auction rate securities (a form of variable rate debt), and the availability of traditional bank liquidity. The effect on major investment banks soon followed with the collapse and exit of major firms from the municipal market. In September 2008, the municipal market was stunned by the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers Holdings (Lehman) and the sale of Merrill Lynch & Co. to Bank of America, leaving four major investment banks. The market environment in 2008 was remarkably different than in 2006, when the swaps were executed and the primary concern was interest rates might increase significantly beyond the levels achievable in the swap market. The financial crisis in 2008 resulted in the failure and/or downgrade of bond insurers and investment banks, reductions in and higher cost of credit liquidity, and declines in interest rates in some markets, particularly the swap market. Under the terms of the swap with LBDP, the bankruptcy of Lehman was a "trigger event" resulting in an early termination of the swap agreement on September 23, 2008. In accordance with the swap agreements and based on the fall in interest rates between August 2006 and September 2008, the Commission was required to make a $3.45 million termination payment to LBDP using commercial paper funds. Had interest rates increased, LBDP would have been required to make a termination payment to the Commission. Interest rates in September 2008 were lower than the 3.679 percent rate obtained in August 2006. At a special meeting in late September 2008, and after considering available options related to the LBDP swap and the potential amount of variable rate debt to be issued and underlying liquidity facility that would be required in October 2009, the Commission authorized the Executive Director to enter into a replacement forward -starting interest rate swap agreement. The replacement swap agreement was executed on September 24, 2008, with Deutsche Bank (DB) at a fixed interest rate of 3.206 percent. The agreement was not significantly different from the agreements executed in 2006. Additionally, Deutsche Bank met the Commission's swap policy credit rating of AA-/Aa3 with a rating of AA-/Aa1. In October 2009, the Commission issued $185 million of 2009 Bonds in three series: A, B, and C. The bond proceeds were used to refinance the 2008 Bonds and $53.7 million of outstanding commercial paper. The 2009 Bonds were integrated with the interest rate swaps that became effective in October 2009, thereby creating synthetic fixed rate debt. The correlation of the 2009 Bonds upon issuance with the interest rate swaps is presented as follows: Agenda Item 9 239 2009 Bonds Series Par Amount Notional Amount of Integrated Swap Bank of America Deutsche Bank A $85 million B C 65 million 35 million $100 million $85 million Since issuance repayment of each series of the 2009 Bonds has been secured by a separate standby bond purchase agreement (SBPA) with a bank and remarketed on a weekly basis by remarketing agents. The current SBPAs with The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., acting through its New York Branch expire in March 2019, and the current remarketing agents are Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. for the Series A bonds and Barclays Capital for the Series B and C bonds. Current Status After the credit crisis in 2008, interest rates continued to decline until December 2015, when the Federal Reserve raised interest rates. Based on interest rates since 2008, if the Commission were to terminate either or both of the swaps, it would have to pay the termination value of the swap(s). The individual and total historical termination value liabilities based on the total outstanding notional amount of both swaps as reported in the Commission's annual audited financial statements are summarized as follows: Fiscal Year Notional Amount Bank of America Deutsche Bank Total Liability 2008/09 $ 185,000,000 $ 9,581,909 $ 4,093,838 $ 13,675,747 2009/10 181,000,000 14,907,041 8,580,933 23,487,974 2010/11 174,700,000 12,302,700 6,718,534 19,021,234 2011/12 168,200,000 20,601,744 13,810,320 34,412,064 2012/13 161,400,000 14,065,309 8,730,010 22,795,319 2013/14 154,300,000 13,382,739 8,454,831 21,837,570 2014/15 146,900,000 13,037,236 8,458,575 21,495,811 As of June 15, 2016, and based on a total notional amount of $139.1 million, the estimated termination values were $15.4 million for Bank of America and $10.7 million for DB, for an aggregate termination value of $26.1 million. The termination value will change as interest rates change. On May 23, 2016, Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) lowered DB's long-term rating to Baa2, which downgrade resulted in the occurrence of an additional termination event under the swap agreement. This downgrade was the second downgrade by Moody's in the last six months. Under the terms of the swap agreement, DB may assign the swap agreement to another counterparty that is acceptable to the Commission within 30 business days of the additional termination event. If the swap is not assigned by DB by July 7, the Commission may give notice to DB to terminate or reserve its rights to terminate. Upon providing a notice of termination, the Commission must specify an early termination date within 20 days of the notice. Agenda Item 9 240 In consultation with the Commission's bond counsel, staff and Fieldman are evaluating the Commission's options in regard to the swap if DB does not assign the swap to an acceptable counterparty. Considerations include: A. Accepting DB's assignment of the swap to another counterparty, if any; B. Waiving the right to terminate the swap; C. Terminating the swap, making the termination payment using available commercial paper, and not entering into a replacement swap; D. Terminating the swap, making the termination payment using available commercial paper proceeds, and executing a replacement swap with a new counterparty selected by the Commission at the current interest rate; or E. Terminating the swap, making the termination payment using available commercial paper proceeds, and refinancing the 2009 Bonds Series A at a fixed interest rate. In order to evaluate the best option representing reduced risks and costs to the Commission, staff and Fieldman have considered today's low interest rate environment, potential difficulties identifying a qualified swap counterparty that would accept assignment of the DB swap agreement or similar terms in a replacement swap, and qualified hedge accounting. After deliberation, staff is currently pursuing Option E with a proposed refinancing in September or October 2016. This option may expose the Commission to some interest rate risk on the bonds' variable interest rates in the short-term following possible swap termination in July through refinancing. However, staff deems this risk minimal as it does not anticipate a dramatic increase in those interest rates over the next few months. In fact, the Commission would not be required to make the monthly swap payment to DB following termination. Fieldman prepared a cash flow comparison between the existing bonds, including SBPA and remarketing fees, and the refinancing of the 2009 Bonds Series A at fixed interest rates. The projected refinancing, which incorporates an estimated termination cost of $10.7 million as of June 15, 2016, results in a net cost of approximately $3 million. This comparison indicates the market difference in the refinancing option appears to absorb about 75 percent of the termination cost. Staff does not propose to terminate the Bank of America swap and refinance the 2009 Bonds Series B and C, as Bank of America's long-term credit rating is A/A1, which is several notches above the minimum requirement of BBB+/Baa1. The swap performance is functioning in accordance with original expectations. NEXT STEPS: Based on the timeline for a potential DB swap termination, it may be necessary to take action prior to obtaining Commission approval. In connection with the execution of the replacement swap with DB by Section 5 of Resolution No. 06-015 adopted in July 2006, the Commission authorized the Executive Director to take any permitted action deemed necessary or desirable related to the DB swap. Should the Executive Director give notice to DB to terminate the swap Agenda Item 9 241 and the Commission make the termination payment, staff will submit a report to the Commission and seek ratification, similar to other previous financing matters for which Executive Director authority was provided in related Commission -adopted resolutions. In connection with a refinancing of a portion of the 2009 Bonds, an official statement, supplemental indenture, and purchase contract will be required, as well as a related resolution approving that document. Disclosure counsel and bond counsel will prepare these documents to be presented at the September Commission meeting, when the Commission will be asked to approve the form of the official statement and authorize its distribution in connection with the new issuance of sales tax revenue bonds (proposed 2016 Bonds). The official statement is required under state and federal securities laws prohibiting the offer and sale of securities such as the 2016 Bonds, unless all matters that would be material to an investor in the 2016 Bonds have been adequately disclosed and there is no omission of material facts. The Commissioners serving on the Board as the governing body of the issuer of the proposed 2016 Bonds will be expected to read and be familiar with the information described in the draft official statement included with the staff report to be presented at future Commission meeting. The Commissioners may employ the services of experts to take the lead in the drafting and review of the official statement; however, the Commissioners have the duty to review the information and bring to the attention of those responsible for the preparation of the official statement any misstatements or omissions in the draft and to ask questions if they are unclear about the information or their role. The financing team will be available at future Commission meeting to respond to the identification of any misstatements or omissions or to such questions. Staff will also provide an estimate of the professional services costs to be incurred in connection with the refinancing of a portion of the 2009 Bonds. Such professional services include the financial advisor, bond counsel, disclosure counsel, and general counsel. The FY 2016/17 budget does not include sufficient amounts for the termination cost estimated at $10.7 million and for professional services costs estimated at $400,000. Accordingly, a budget adjustment is required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $11,100,000 (estimate) Source of Funds: Commercial Paper Budget Adjustment: Yes GL/Project Accounting No.: 303 19 97201 304 19 65XXX $10 700,000 $ 400,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-XA Date: 06/16/2016 Agenda Item 9 242 Interest Rate Swaps and Variable Rate Debt July 13, 2016 2002 •Voters approve Measure A extension • • 2005 •Establish commercial paper program 2006 •Rising interest rates •Execute swaps with Lehman Brothers (Lehman) and Bank of America (BofA) • 2009 •Issue variable rate bonds that integrate with swaps •2009A—DB swap •2009B&C—BofA swap • • 2008 •Credit market crisis •Issue fixed rate bonds with 12/2009 mandatory tender •Terminate Lehman swap due to bankruptcy "trigger event" and pay $3.5 million as settlement •Replace swap with Deutsche Bank (DB) Business decision to hedge against potential rate increases • Not speculation • Awareness of risks and mitigation strategies Contract to exchange cash flow • Starts at future date • RCTC pays fixed interest rate (3.679 percent) • Counterparty pays floating/variable interest rate (67 percent of one -month LIBOR) Payments based on notional amount • Principal amounts not exchanged Cash flo s derived from reference to index rates • London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) — associated with taxable financings and swaps • Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) — related to tax-exempt financings ��E > / / r \/ i Liquidity/ Remarketing Fees*** RCTC 71 n _ 0 ii ti ti � Mt n Q.(Q 0 i Bond Holders (Linked (Lin Counterparty Floating. Rate** FI Fixed Rate* to 67% of LIBOR) • Rates are 3.67913/0 ($100 million with BofA), 3.206% ($85 million with DB), or weighted average of 3.42% **Relationship between rates could vary weekly ***Liquidity fees have ranged from 44 bps (current) to 125 bps; remarketing fees have ranged from 6 bps (current) to 10 bps RCTC receives 67% of LIBOR (floating rate) CTC Basis Gain1 RCTC Basis Cost2 0.29% 0.31% RCTC pays SIFMA to bondholders (floating rate) (0.01%) 4 RCTC basis differential Gain (cost) RCTC pays counterparty (fixed rate) RCTC pays liquidity & remarketing fees (fixed cost) RCTC net cost of funds for week3 (0.39 %) 0.28% (0.08%) (3.42%) (3.42%) (0.50%) (0.50%) (3.64%) (4.00%) 'January 2016 example 2June 2016 example 320-year fixed interest rate in August 2006 approximated 4.40% and in October 2009 approximated 4.00% i Counterparty As of June 15, 2016, subject to change Bank of America Deutsche Bank • Notional amount/swap rate • Minimum long-term debt rating of BBB+/Baa1 • Termination value (liability) • $75.2 million/3.679 percent • A/A 1 • ($15.4 million)1 • $63.9 million/3.206 percent • BBB+/Baa2 • ($10.7 million)1 Accept Deutsche Bank replacement swap, if proposed Waive right to terminate swap Terminate swap and pay termination payment • No replacement swap • Unhedged position • Replacement swap • Lower rate but limited qualified counterparties • Refinance 2009 Series A at fixed interest rate • Interest rate decrease absorbs about 75 percent of termination cost • Interest rate certainty through 2029 Continue to evaluate financing options Provide notice to Deutsche Bank on July T T T T T Reserve rights to all remedies, including termination Update Commission in Septembe Report on swap status Present refinancing documents AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 13, 2016 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Programming of Additional Federal Funds for Union Pacific Pachappa Underpass Project and 2016 Earmark Repurposing Funds BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Rescind previous programming for the Pachappa Underpass project (Pachappa project) including up to $13 million of federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds and 1989 Measure A Western Riverside County highway funds; 2) Approve programming $847,552 of available 2016 federal earmark repurposing funds from prior Commission projects and additional federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) and/or CMAQ funds to the Pachappa project to complete the State Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane project for a total amount of $12 million; 3) Approve programming available federal repurposed earmark balances that cannot be used by other local agencies to the Pachappa project in place of federal STP and/or CMAQ funds so funds stay within Riverside County and do not lapse; 4) Approve an increase of $2,261,700 in Fiscal Year 2016/17 Budget federal revenues; and 5) Direct staff to continue working with the cities and county to review eligible projects for repurposing and provide assistance with the federal repurposing process. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On March 8, 2016, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued guidance on repurposing earmark balances (or savings) that are 10 years old or have not been obligated. The repurposing funds are made available from the federal transportation bill, Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), and will be a one-time only opportunity to repurpose the earmark balances. Per FHWA guidance, the repurposed earmark must be obligated by September 30, 2019, and if the funds are not obligated by this date, the funds will lapse with no opportunity for an extension or to repurpose the funds to another project. Since the funds are federal, any project identified for repurposing must comply with all federal aid requirements. Projects identified for repurposing must also be within 50 miles of the original earmark project. Agenda Item 10 243 The Commission was the lead agency on three of the old earmark projects, and therefore, staff recommends the earmark balances totaling $847,552 are repurposed to the Commission's Pachappa project, which is the last segment of the SR-91 HOV Lane project. Federal funds were previously programmed on the SR-91 HOV Lane project. Project Federal Legislation Balance Realign and improve SR-79 TEA-21 $ 84,436 SR-79 improvements SAFETEA-LU $ 43,195 SR-74/I-215 interchange (IC) SAFETEA-LU $719,921 Total $847,552 In December 2015, the Commission supported Caltrans' recommendation to delete the Pachappa project work from the SR-91 HOV Lane project construction contract and repackage the work as the Pachappa project with the Commission serving as lead agency. This would allow the existing construction contract to be completed sooner and would reduce the overall cost of both projects. The Commission also approved reprogramming to the Pachappa project up to $13 million of federal CMAQ funds and remaining 1989 Measure A Western Riverside County highway funds from the SR-91 HOV Lane project construction and right of way phases. Staff stated at that time, should additional funds be required, a new item would be brought to the Commission for action. The SR-91 HOV Lane project is substantially complete; however, closeout of the project has not been completed, so the remaining balance of funds has not yet been determined. Due to this uncertainty, staff recommends: 1) rescinding the previous programming of remaining CMAQ balances and 1989 Measure A Western Riverside County highway funds from the SR-91 HOV Lane project; and 2) programming sufficient federal funds (a combination of CMAQ STP, and repurposed earmarks) to cover the entire Pachappa project. Utilizing the repurposed funds allows the Commission to save local funds, as the funding for the Pachappa project will consist of 100 percent federal funds through a combination of STP and/or CMAQ and a minimum of $847,552, of federal earmark repurposed funds. The repurposed funds may increase depending on review of the other earmark balances; however, the total programming amount of federal funds for the Pachappa project is $12 million. There are other old earmark balances on county and city projects within Riverside County that are available for repurposing. Balances on these projects are currently being discussed with the local agencies regarding the status of the earmark projects and the ability for the local agency to repurpose the balance on another federally eligible project within the obligation deadline. Other earmark project balances that were identified by FHWA for potential repurposing include the following: Agenda Item 10 244 Agency Project Legislation Repurpose Yes/No Balance Banning/County of Riverside Ramsey Street Extension 2003 App Act Yes, project infeasible $ 1,738,625 *Beaumont SR-60/Potrero IC SAFETEA-LU Under review 1,439,840 Calimesa County Line Road Improvement SAFETEA-LU No, project ongoing 933,840 Corona SR-91/Green River TEA-21 Yes, project complete 156,585 County of Riverside SR-86/Avenue 66 Grade Separation SAFETEA-LU No, project ongoing 3,239,640 Desert Hot Springs Upgrade Essential Roads SAFETEA-LU Yes, project complete 36,544 Murrieta I-215/Los Alamos IC SAFETEA-LU No, project ongoing 346,983 Murrieta I-15/California Oaks SAFETEA-LU Yes, project complete 1,439,840 Riverside Victoria Restoration SAFETEA-LU Yes, project ineligible 359,960 Temecula I-15/SR-79 IC SAFETEA-LU No, project ongoing 1,439,840 Temecula I-15/Winchester IC SAFETEA-LU No, project ongoing 1,439,840 *City staff is currently reviewing the status of the project. Staff will continue to work with the cities and county to ensure the request to repurpose the earmark balance is done according to FHWA and Caltrans guidance. Staff recommends any balance on the above repurposing list that will not be utilized by the local agency, or relates to a project determined infeasible, be repurposed to the Pachappa project. The only exception is that earmark balances in Coachella Valley would need to remain there to meet the 50 mile repurposing requirement. Therefore, staff will coordinate earmark balances in the Coachella Valley, if any, with the county of Riverside and Coachella Valley Association of Governments. It should be noted earmark balances on projects that are ongoing, or are not recommended for repurposing, are not subject to an expiration date. Staff will continue to review the status of city of Beaumont's earmark project on SR-60/Potrero Boulevard interchange and will report back to the Commission if these funds will remain on the project or if the funds will be repurposed. If the funds are to be repurposed, staff recommends that the balance of $1,439,840, also be added to the Pachappa project. The schedule for recommending projects for repurposing is as follows: 08/01/16 Regions submit project repurposing forms to Caltrans 08/31/16 Caltrans submits repurposed list of projects to FHWA 09/12/16 Deadline for repurposing As outlined above, projects identified for repurposing must be submitted to Caltrans by August 1, 2016. Therefore, policy direction is needed to target the earmark balances on as few projects as possible to avoid a burdensome process that could jeopardize the availability of this repurposing opportunity. Staff's recommendation to repurpose the earmark balances on the Agenda Item 10 245 Pachappa project, which is already federalized and can obligate the funds within the year, will achieve the above deadlines and guarantee the funds are not a loss to the county. There is no financial impact related to the repurposing of the earmark funds; rather, the programming of such funds for the Pachappa project creates the financial impact to the Commission. The FY 2016/17 Budget includes federal revenues of $9,738,300; therefore, a budget adjustment of $2,261,700 is required to increase the federal revenues. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes No Year: FY 2016/17 FY 2016/17 Amount: $9,738,300 $2,261,700 Source of Funds: Federal STP, CMAQ, and earmarks Budget Adjustment: No Yes GL/Project Accounting No.: 003038 414 41410 0000 262 31 41401 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \iii_biAtal Date: 06/21/2016 Agenda Item 10 246 Earmark Repurposing Riverside County Transportation Commission July 13, 2016 .. cam, tows ccomisuon Earmark project balances can be repurposed if: — They are 10 years or older; — Less than 10 percent has been obligated; — The project is complete and a balance remains; and — Original earmark project has been closed out. "One Time Only Offer" Projects identified for repurposed funds: • 50 mile radius • Funds must be obligated by 09/30/2019 • Projects must meet federal requirements and adhere to the federal aid process • State decides Earmark Recipient RCTC Repurpose to Pachappa Underpass project (related to SR-91 HOV Project) City/County in Western County Work with City/County to identify eligible project(s) for repurposing. City/County in Coachella Valley If none available in that jurisdiction, repurpose to Pachappa Underpass project Work with City/County and CVAG to identify eligible project(s) for repurposing. " Ensure all earmark funds are spent within Riverside County, no loss of funds. " Repurpose funding on as few projects as possible. " Prioritize funding on projects close to, or ready for construction. " Prioritize RCTC earmark funds for regional Measure A projects. " If possible, keep earmark funds in original jurisdiction or area. If not, assist regional Measure A projects. Balance Banning/ County of Riv. Ramsey St. Extension $1,738,625 *Beaumont (under review) Corona SR-60/ Potrero $1,439,840 IC SR-91/Green River IC $156,585 Desert Hot Springs Upgrade $36,544 Essential Roads Murrieta I-15/ California $1,439,840 Oaks IC Riverside Victoria Ave. $359,960 Restoration County of Riv. SR-86/Ave 66 $3,239,640 Grade Sep Recipient Balance RCTC Realign and improve SR-79 RCTC RCTC SR-79 improvements SR-74/I-215 interchange Total $84,436 $43,195 $719,921 $847,552 - In December 2015, the Commission approved funding the Pachappa Underpass project (last segment of the 91 HOV project) with remaining federal CMAQ funds on the overall 91 HOV lane project. - This item rescinds December action to keep federal CMAQ funds on the 91 HOV for final close out purposes. - Recommending funding Pachappa Underpass project with unprogrammed federal STP/CMAQ and $847,552 of repurposing funds for a total of $12 million. - Recommend any earmark balance that cannot be repurposed to also be repurposed to the Pachappa Underpass project. " Aug 1 - Regions must submit repurposing requests to Caltrans " Aug 31 - Caltrans submits repurposing list to Federal Highway Administration " Sept 12 - Deadline for repurposing " Sept 14 - Follow up item to Commission Commission staff will continue to work with local agencies on identifying projects for repurposing and assist with submittal to Caltrans. Questions? cam, Trenspriows ccauon