HomeMy Public PortalAbout10 October 12, 2016 CommissionComments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission,
please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board.
MEETING AGENDA
TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, October 12, 2016
LOCATION: BOARD ROOM
County of Riverside Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside
COMMISSIONERS
Chair – Scott Matas
Vice Chair – John F. Tavaglione
Second Vice Chair – Dana Reed
Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside
John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside
Chuck Washington, County of Riverside
John J. Benoit, County of Riverside
Marion Ashley, County of Riverside
Deborah Franklin / Art Welch, City of Banning
Lloyd White / Mike Lara, City of Beaumont
Joseph DeConinck / Tim Wade, City of Blythe
Ella Zanowic / Joyce McIntire, City of Calimesa
Dawn Haggerty / Jordan Ehrenkranz, City of Canyon Lake
Greg Pettis / Shelley Kaplan, City of Cathedral City
Steven Hernandez / To Be Appointed, City of Coachella
Karen Spiegel / Randy Fox, City of Corona
Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs
Adam Rush / Clint Lorimore, City of Eastvale
Linda Krupa / Paul Raver, City of Hemet
Dana Reed / Douglas Hanson, City of Indian Wells
Michael Wilson / Glenn Miller, City of Indio
Frank Johnston / Brian Berkson, City of Jurupa Valley
Robert Radi / To Be Appointed, City of La Quinta
Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore
Scott Mann / John Denver, City of Menifee
Yxstian Gutierrez / Jesse Molina, City of Moreno Valley
Rick Gibbs / Jonathan Ingram, City of Murrieta
Berwin Hanna / Ted Hoffman, City of Norco
Jan Harnik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert
Ginny Foat / Geoffrey Kors, City of Palm Springs
Daryl Busch / Rita Rogers, City of Perris
Ted Weill / To Be Appointed, City of Rancho Mirage
Rusty Bailey / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside
Andrew Kotyuk / Crystal Ruiz, City of San Jacinto
Michael S. Naggar / Michael McCracken, City of Temecula
Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar
John Bulinski, Director, Governor’s Appointee Caltrans District 8
COMM-COMM-00061
Riverside County Transportation Commission
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board
DATE: October 5, 2016
SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest — Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agenda of October 12, 2016
The October 12, 2016 agenda of the Riverside County Transportation Commission includes items
that may raise possible conflicts of interest. A Commissioner may not participate in any discussion
or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is
received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual
listed.
Agenda Item No. 8A — Amendment to Interstate 15 Express Lanes Proiect Investment Grade Traffic
and Revenue Study Services Agreement
Consultant(s): Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Steve Abendschein, Senior Principal
50 W. 23rd Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10010
Agenda Item No. 8C — 91 Express Lanes Traffic Operations Center Video Systems Maintenance
Agreement
Consultant(s): Parsons Transportation Group
Daniel Lukasik, Vice President
One Centerpointe Drive, Suite 210
La Palma, CA 90623
Agenda Item No. 8E — Agreement with Mobile Relay Associates, LLC for Freeway Service Patrol
Digital Radio System, Equipment, and Services
Consultant(s): Mobile Relay Associates, LLC
Joyce Peters, Sales Manager
15330 Vermont Avenue
Paramount, CA 90723
RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest
October 5, 2016
Page 2
Agenda Item No. 10 — Call Box Program Reductions and Upgrades
Consultant(s): CASE Systems Inc.
Sebastian E. Gutierrez
5 Goddard
Irvine, CA 92618
Agenda Item No. 126 — Closed Session — Conference With Real Property Negotiators
For the Pachappa Project
Item
APN(s)
RCPN
Property Owner(s)
1
219-182-004
219-182-006
219-182-007
1086
City of Riverside
2
219-182-010
219-182-011
1087
AT&SF
3
219-182-014
219-191-001
219-094-005
219-103-015
219-103-017
1088
AT&SF
4
219-182-003
1089
UPRR
5
219-103-016
219-103-031
1090
UPRR
6
219-182-005
1091
UPRR
7
219-103-019
1092
City of Riverside
8
219-182-012
1093
City of Riverside
9
219-181-012
1094
Bates, Theodore
10
219-181-007
1095
Bobo, Kenneth
For the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project
Item
APN(s)
RCPN
Property Owner(s)
11
277-301-007
1096
Villareal, Francisco & Yolanda
12
277-301-014
1097
Farragut, George H & Lisa L
13
277-301-015
1098
Neice, George M & Gerarda
14
277-301-016
1099
Gricol, Thomas P & Christel
15
277-301-017
1100
Nelson, Steven E & Jennifer
16
277-301-018
1101
Lage, Michael & Jennifer C
17
277-301-019
1102
Votava, Larry Joseph
18
277-313-006
1103
Reynolds, Ronald L & Sydnia C
19
277-210-001
1104
Corner Stone Enterprises
20
277-330-015
1105
Finks, Irving Joseph & Diane Marie
21
277-330-014
1106
Spirit, Susanne
22
277-330-013
1107
Rauda, Boris P
RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest
October 5, 2016
Page 3
23
277-330-012
1108
Carpio, Delfidio & Maria I
24
277-330-011
1109
Rechlin, Mark & Leticia Carino
25
277-330-010
1110
Bushong, Sean
26
277-330-009
1111
Fuller, Darlene J & Gilbert
27
277-330-008
1112
Eilefson, Dennia
28
277-343-006
1113
Moore, Cecil T & Ingrid J
29
277-343-005
1114
Verdusco, Veronica & Alfred Garcia
30
277-343-004
1115
Dusterer, Ernst & Corinne
31
277-343-003
1116
Jones, Joe Ann Ray
32
115-070-001
1117
BNSF
33
115-080-025
1118
Choi, Bruce Inback & Doyun
34
115-070-016
115-070-018
1119
City of Norco
For the Mid County Project
Item
APN(s)
RCPN
Property Owner(s)
35
300-210-016
1085
Stagliano, Vincent J. & Peggy S. Trust
36
300-210-017
1120
lglesia Familia de Dios
37
300-210-024
1121
Merriweather, Milton & Gloria Family Trust
38
300-210-025
1122
Mikus, Carole L, Mikus Family Credit Trust
39
426-060-020
1123
Hammerschmidt, Bernice & B.E.
40
426-072-001
1124
Hammerschmidt, Bernice & B.E.
Tara Byerly
From: Tara Byerly
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 11:19 AM
To: Tara Byerly
Cc: Anne Mayer; STANDIFO; Jennifer Harmon
Subject: RCTC: Amended October Commission Agenda - 10.12.2016
Importance: High
Good morning Commissioners:
Attached is the Amended Commission Agenda for the Commission meeting tomorrow. The only change was to the
order of the agenda, which has been also posted on the Commission website and the link is included below. I also
included a pdf of the face portion of the Commission for your use.
http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/october-12-2016.original.pdf
AGENDA
10_Amended_N...
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you.
Respectfully,
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Tara Byerly
Deputy Clerk of the Board
Riverside County Transportation Commission
PO Box 12008, Riverside, CA 92502-2208
4080 Lemon Street, 3,d Floor, Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 787-7141 I rctc.org
i
Tara Byerly
From: Tara Byerly
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 4:02 PM
To: Tara Byerly
Cc: Jennifer Harmon; Anne Mayer; STANDIFO
Subject: RCTC: October Commission Agenda - 10.12.2016
Importance: High
Good afternoon Commissioners:
The October Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 12, 2016 @ 9:30 a.m. is available.
Please copy the link:
http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/october-12-2016.original.pdf
Conflict of Conflict of
Interest Form.pdf Interest Memo.p...
Also, attached for your review and information is the conflict of interest memo and form. Please let me know if you
have any questions. Thank you.
Respectfully,
=err=
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Tara Byerly
Deputy Clerk of the Board
Riverside County Transportation Commission
PO Box 12008, Riverside, CA 92502-2208
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 787-7141 I rctc.org
i
Tara Byerly
From: Tara Byerly
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 4:05 PM
To: Tara Byerly
Subject: RCTC: October Commission Agenda - 10.12.2016
Importance: High
Good afternoon Commission Alternates:
The October Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 12, 2016 @ 9:30 a.m. is available.
Please copy the link:
http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/october-12-2016.original.pdf
Thank you.
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Tara Byerly
Deputy Clerk of the Board
Riverside County Transportation Commission
PO Box 12008, Riverside, CA 92502-2208
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 787-7141 I rctc.org
i
AMENDED AGENDA
Revision to Agenda Item Order
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
www.rctc.org
AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda
9:30 a.m.
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
BOARD ROOM
County of Riverside Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA
In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours
prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for
inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third
Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission’s website, www.rctc.org.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal
Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787‐7141 if special assistance is
needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is
provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring
reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less.
The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive
this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of
speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous
minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty
(30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become
repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written
documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board.
This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items.
Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public
comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such
matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – SEPTEMBER 14, 2016
Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda
October 12, 2016
Page 2
6. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS – The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a
finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the
attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an
item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the
Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added
items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
7. PRESENTATION: 40TH ANNIVERSARY SPOTLIGHT – SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY
EMERGENCIES
8. CONSENT CALENDAR – All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion
unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the
Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
8A. AMENDMENT TO INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT INVESTMENT GRADE
TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STUDY SERVICES AGREEMENT
Page 1
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 15‐31‐048‐01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No.
15‐31‐048‐00, with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) for investment
grade traffic and revenue study services for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes
project for an additional amount of $199,400 and a total amount not to exceed
$1,399,400; and
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission.
8B. AMENDMENT TO 91 EXPRESS LANES RCTC‐OCTA FACILITY AGREEMENT
Page 9
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 16‐31‐025‐01, Amendment No. 1 to the 91 Express
Lanes RCTC‐OCTA Facility Agreement No. 16‐31‐025‐00, with the Orange
County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for the Corona Customer Service
Center (CSC) in the additional amounts of $50,000 for tenant improvements,
$78,316 for rent, plus a contingency amount of $6,416, for a total additional
amount not to exceed $134,732;
2) Authorize Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the
contingency amount as may be required for the project.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda
October 12, 2016
Page 3
8C. 91 EXPRESS LANES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CENTER VIDEO SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT
Page 45
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Award Agreement No. 17‐31‐020‐00 to Parsons Transportation Group
(Parsons) for maintenance and repair of the video systems for the 91 Express
Lanes Traffic Operations Center (TOC) for a one‐year term, and two one‐year
options plus two two‐year options to extend the agreement, and authorize in
an amount not to exceed $850,934; and
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, subject to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission.
8D. CALTRANS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES
Page 74
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 17‐31‐021‐00 with the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) for roadway maintenance of the RCTC 91 Express
Lanes for a 50‐year term in an amount not to exceed $245,104 for the initial
18‐month period;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute amendments to the agreement
related to the cost for each annual work plan following the initial period for an
additional amount not to exceed an annual increase of 3 percent.
8E. AGREEMENT WITH MOBILE RELAY ASSOCIATES, LLC FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL
DIGITAL RADIO SYSTEM, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES
Page 98
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Award Agreement No. 17‐45‐022‐00 to Mobile Relay Associates, LLC (MRA) for
a Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) digital radio system, equipment, and services for
a three‐year term and two one‐year options to extend the agreement, in an
amount not to exceed $150,000; and
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda
October 12, 2016
Page 4
9. RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES OPENING DAY TOLL RATES
Page 129
Overview
This item is for the Commission to receive and file the schedule of opening day toll rates for
the RCTC 91 Express Lanes.
10. CALL BOX PROGRAM REDUCTIONS AND UPGRADES
Page 155
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve the implementation of Call Box Scenario 3;
2) Approve Agreement No. 13‐45‐102‐02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement
No. 13‐45‐102‐00, with CASE Systems, Inc. (CASE) to provide call box removal and
upgrade services consistent with Call Box Scenario 3, for an additional amount of
$384,240, and a total amount not to exceed $1,384,240; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the
amendment on behalf of the Commission.
11. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Page 161
Overview
This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on the state and federal
legislation.
12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
13. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Overview
This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report
on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities.
14. CLOSED SESSION
14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (d)(2) of Government Code Section
54956.9
Potential Number of Case(s): 1
Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda
October 12, 2016
Page 5
14B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee
Property Owner(s): See Below
Item APN(s) RCPN Property Owner(s)
1 219‐182‐004
219‐182‐006
219‐182‐007
1086 City of Riverside
2 219‐182‐010
219‐182‐011
1087 AT&SF
3 219‐182‐014
219‐191‐001
219‐094‐005
219‐103‐015
219‐103‐017
1088 AT&SF
4 219‐182‐003 1089 UPRR
5 219‐103‐016
219‐103‐031
1090 UPRR
6 219‐182‐005 1091 UPRR
7 219‐103‐019 1092 City of Riverside
8 219‐182‐012 1093 City of Riverside
9 219‐181‐012 1094 Bates, Theodore
10 219‐181‐007 1095 Bobo, Kenneth
11 277‐301‐007 1096 Villareal, Francisco & Yolanda
12 277‐301‐014 1097 Farragut, George H & Lisa L
13 277‐301‐015 1098 Neice, George M & Gerarda
14 277‐301‐016 1099 Gricol, Thomas P & Christel
15 277‐301‐017 1100 Nelson, Steven E & Jennifer
16 277‐301‐018 1101 Lage, Michael & Jennifer C
17 277‐301‐019 1102 Votava, Larry Joseph
18 277‐313‐006 1103 Reynolds, Ronald L & Sydnia C
19 277‐210‐001 1104 Corner Stone Enterprises
20 277‐330‐015 1105 Finks, Irving Joseph & Diane Marie
21 277‐330‐014 1106 Spirit, Susanne
22 277‐330‐013 1107 Rauda, Boris P
23 277‐330‐012 1108 Carpio, Delfidio & Maria I
24 277‐330‐011 1109 Rechlin, Mark & Leticia Carino
25 277‐330‐010 1110 Bushong, Sean
26 277‐330‐009 1111 Fuller, Darlene J & Gilbert
27 277‐330‐008 1112 Eilefson, Dennia
28 277‐343‐006 1113 Moore, Cecil T & Ingrid J
29 277‐343‐005 1114 Verdusco, Veronica & Alfred Garcia
30 277‐343‐004 1115 Dusterer, Ernst & Corinne
31 277‐343‐003 1116 Jones, Joe Ann Ray
Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda
October 12, 2016
Page 6
Item APN(s) RCPN Property Owner(s)
32 115‐070‐001 1117 BNSF
33 115‐080‐025 1118 Choi, Bruce Inback & Doyun
34 115‐070‐016
115‐070‐018
1119 City of Norco
35 300‐210‐016 1085 Stagliano, Vincent J. & Peggy S. Trust
36 300‐210‐017 1120 Iglesia Familia de Dios
37 300‐210‐024 1121 Merriweather, Milton & Gloria Family Trust
38 300‐210‐025 1122 Mikus, Carole L, Mikus Family Credit Trust
39 426‐060‐020 1123 Hammerschmidt, Bernice & B.E.
40 426‐072‐001 1124 Hammerschmidt, Bernice & B.E.
15. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the Commission is scheduled to be held on Wednesday,
November 9, 2016, Board Room, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street,
Riverside.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
ROLL CALL
OCTOBER 12, 2016
County of Riverside, District I
County of Riverside, District II
County of Riverside, District III
County of Riverside, District IV
County of Riverside, District V
City of Banning
Present
0
0
City of Beaumont ,� 0
0
Absent
0
0
0
City of Blythe
City of Calimesa
City of Canyon Lake
City of Cathedral City
City of Coachella
City of Corona
City of Desert Hot Springs
City of Eastvale
City of Hemet
City of Indian Wells
City of Indio
City of Jurupa Valley
City of La Qu i nta
J7r
0
0
0
0
0
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Menifee
City of Moreno Valley
City of Murrieta
City of Norco
City of Palm Desert
City of Palm Springs
City of Perris
City of Rancho Mirage
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
City of Temecula
City of Wildomar
Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8
DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD
DATE: f 0 - 12 - / /O
CHECK IF
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
AGENDA ITEM NO.:
(AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA)
NAME:
ADDRESS:
UBJECT OF
PUBLIC COMMENTS: SSV51-4 /fah // Jay 62rdrit
SUBJECT OF
AGENDA ITEM:
% I ) 6 kdv
STREET
PHONE NO.:
St; /7 ge r/71r ec6;10
CITY
REPRESENTINGSO (i �i /175- -0, ��7 l.d efr' J
NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP
PHONE NO.:
?"747-92- y(e
ZIP CODE
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET
CITY
ZIP CODE
AGENDA ITEM 5
MINUTES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by
Chair Scott Matas at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside
Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501.
Chair Matas provided audio/visual system instructions for the new system and noted
there are information technology staff available to help.
Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board, provided voting instructions for the new audio/visual
system.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Dana Reed led the Commission in a flag salute.
3. ROLL CALL
Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent
Marion Ashley Andrew Kotyuk John J. Benoit
Rusty Bailey Linda Krupa Jan Harnik
Ben Benoit Bob Magee Greg Pettis
John Bulinski Scott Matas Adam Rush
Daryl Busch Jesse Molina Michael Wilson
John Denver Michael Naggar
Joseph DeConinck Robert Radi
Ginny Foat* Dana Reed
Deborah Franklin Karen Spiegel
Rick Gibbs John F. Tavaglione
Dawn Haggerty Chuck Washington
Berwin Hanna Ted Weill
Steven Hernandez Lloyd White
Kevin Jeffries Ella Zanowic
Frank Johnston
*Arrived after the meeting was called to order
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 2
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Steve Hosford, Vice President of the Inland Empire Branch of the American Public Works
Association, presented Capital Projects Manager Edda Rosso with a plaque for the
Commission’s Perris Valley Line project, which was selected as Project of the Year for large
projects. He noted the nominated projects needed to exhibit contributions to the
community and help promote public works.
Arnold San Miguel, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), announced
SCAG is hosting the California Housing Summit for elected officials on October 11,
8 a.m. – 2 p.m. at the L.A. Hotel. Flyers were distributed to the Commissioners at the dais.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JUNE 8 AND JULY 13, 2016
M/S/C (Krupa/Ashley) to approve the June 8 and July 13, 2016 minutes as
submitted.
6. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS
There were no additions or revisions to the agenda.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
M/S/C (Franklin/Washington) to approve the following Consent Calendar items.
7A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended June 30,
2016.
7B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT
Receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the fourth quarter
ended June 30, 2016.
7C. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS
Receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 1, 2016 (1Q 2016).
7D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended June 30,
2016.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 3
7E. FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT AND MEASURE A
AUDIT RESULTS
Receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Measure A audit
results report for Fiscal Year 2014/15.
7F. TOLL FACILITY AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS FOR INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS
LANES IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
1) Approve Agreement No. 17‐31‐002‐00 with Caltrans for Interstate 15
Express Lanes in Riverside County allowing the Commission to operate toll
lanes for 50 years;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to authorize non‐funding
changes as may be required for the project.
7G. ESTABLISHING THE RCTC OPERATIONS CENTER FOR TOLL OPERATIONS
1) Authorize staff to establish an integrated toll operations office – the RCTC
Operations Center (ROC);
2) Authorize staff to pursue the purchase of an existing office building to
serve as the ROC and return to the Commission with a purchase and sale
agreement recommendation for future consideration; and
3) Authorize staff to pursue the lease of an existing office building to serve as
the ROC should a purchase of an existing office building not be possible or
advisable to meet the Commission’s near‐term requirements.
7H. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE CAJALCO ROAD WIDENING PROJECT
Approve an additional $3 million of 2009 Measure A Western County New
Corridors and/or federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds to cover
costs associated with an expanded environmental document for the county of
Riverside’s (County) Cajalco Road widening project.
7I. CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST TO REPROGRAM FUNDING FROM
INTERSTATE 15/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY PHASE 1 TO PHASE 2
1) Approve reprogramming the balance of Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Community Environmental Transportation
Accountability Program (CETAP) funds for the Interstate 15/French Valley
Parkway interchange improvement project from Phase 1 to Phase 2 in the
amount of $1,472,509;
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 4
2) Approve Agreement No. 11‐72‐036‐01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement
No. 11‐72‐036‐00, with the city of Temecula (Temecula) for the I‐
15/French Valley Parkway interchange improvement Phase 1 project to
reflect the decrease in funding of $1,472,509;
3) Approve Agreement No. 17‐73‐007‐00 with Temecula for the I‐15/French
Valley Parkway interchange improvement Phase 2 project funding in an
amount not to exceed $1,472,509; and
4) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreements.
7J. CONSTRUCTION FUNDING REQUEST FOR INTERSTATE 215/SCOTT ROAD
INTERCHANGE
1) Approve $8 million in federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds
for the Interstate 215/Scott Road interchange improvement project; and
2) Direct staff to amend the Federal Transportation Improvement Program
(FTIP) and Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) to update the project
description and funding for Phase I and Phase II improvements.
7K. 2016 EARMARK REPURPOSING OF FEDERAL FUNDS UPDATE
1) Receive and file a report on the status of the 2016 Earmark Repurposing of
Federal Funds; and
2) Approve the replacement of the earmark balance for the State Route
60/Potrero Boulevard interchange with federal funds, in the amount of
$1,439,840, at such time when the project is deemed by Caltrans to be
ready to list.
7L. FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 ANNUAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND PLANNING
ALLOCATIONS TO WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Approve an allocation of Local Transportation Fund (LTF) planning funds in the
amount of $701,250 for Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and
$382,500 for the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) for efforts
identified in each agency’s Fiscal Year 2016/17 LTF Program Objectives/Work Plan
(Work Plan) that supports transportation planning programs, and functions
consistent with regional and subregional plans, programs and requirements.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 5
7M. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE INTERSTATE 215 CENTRAL
WIDENING PROJECT FROM SCOTT ROAD TO NUEVO ROAD IN THE CITY OF PERRIS
1) Approve Agreement No. 12‐31‐034‐07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement
No. 12‐31‐034‐00, with Jacobs Project Management Co. (Jacobs) to fund
the cost of extended construction management, inspection, and testing
services for the Interstate 215 Central widening project in the amount of
$441,328, plus a contingency amount of $44,000, for an additional amount
of $485,328, and a total amount not to exceed $14,690,339;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission;
3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the
contingency amount as may be required for the project;
4) Approve reprogramming up to $500,000 of State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds
from construction capital to construction support;
5) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute Agreement No. 12‐31‐078‐03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement
No. 12‐31‐078‐00, with Caltrans to transfer up to $500,000 of STIP‐RIP
funds from construction capital to construction support; and
6) Approve an increase of $250,000 in FY 2016/17 budget revenues and
expenditures for construction management services related to the project.
7N. AMENDMENT TO TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE REGIONAL
ARTERIAL AGREEMENT FOR THE INTERSTATE 15/RAILROAD CANYON ROAD
INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
1) Approve Agreement No. 10‐72‐016‐05, Amendment No. 5 to Agreement
No. 10‐72‐016‐00, with the city of Lake Elsinore (Lake Elsinore) for the
Interstate 15/Railroad Canyon Road interchange project to authorize an
additional $350,000 in Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
funds to complete project approval and environmental document (PA&ED)
phase for a total PA&ED phase funding amount of $2,555,000;
2) Approve Agreement No. 11‐31‐107‐05, Amendment No. 5 to Agreement
No. 11‐31‐107‐00, with SC Engineering to complete the PA&ED services
associated with the project in the amount of $230,000, plus an additional
contingency amount of $34,500 for an additional amount of $264,500, and
a total amount not to exceed $1,494,509;
3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 6
4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve release of
contingency work up to the total authorized amount as may be required
for the project.
7O. AGREEMENT WITH JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMPANY FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
PACHAPPA UNDERPASS PROJECT
1) Award Agreement No. 16‐31‐051‐00 to Jacobs Project Management
Company (Jacobs) to provide construction management (CM), materials
testing, and construction surveying services for the Pachappa Underpass
project, in the amount of $1,739,231, plus a contingency amount of
$260,769, for a total amount not to exceed $2 million;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency
work as may be required for the project.
7P. LIST OF PRE‐QUALIFIED FIRMS AND AGREEMENTS FOR ON‐CALL GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION – LABORATORY AND FIELD TESTING OF MATERIALS SERVICES
1) Award the following agreements to provide on‐call geotechnical
investigation – laboratory and field testing of materials services for a three‐
year term with two one‐year options to extend the agreement, in an
amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $500,000;
a) Agreement No. 16‐31‐078‐00 with Converse Consultants
(Converse);
b) Agreement No. 16‐31‐112‐00 with Leighton Consulting Inc.
(Leighton); and
c) Agreement No. 16‐31‐113‐00 with Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical
and Environmental Sciences Consultants (Ninyo & Moore)
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the
Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders
awarded to contractors under the terms of the agreements.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 7
7Q. AGREEMENT FOR SECURITY GUARD SERVICES AT COMMISSION‐OWNED
COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS AND CONTROL CENTER
1) Award Agreement No. 16‐24‐079‐00 to Allied Universal Security Services
(Allied Universal) for the provision of security services and leased golf carts
at the Commission‐owned commuter rail stations and control center for a
three‐year term, and two two‐year options to extend the agreement, in an
amount not to exceed $18,336,000; and
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the
Commission.
7R. AGREEMENTS FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK SERVICES
1) Award Agreement No. 16‐45‐082‐00 to Pepe’s Towing for Freeway Service
Patrol (FSP) tow truck services on State Route 91 Beat No. 4 for a three‐
year term, and one two‐year option to extend the agreement, in an
amount not to exceed $1,330,000;
2) Award Agreement No. 16‐45‐083‐00 to Pepe’s Towing for FSP tow truck
services on SR‐60 Beat No. 7 for a three‐year term, and one two‐year
option to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed $1,330,000;
3) Award Agreement No. 16‐45‐103‐00 to Steve’s Towing for FSP tow truck
services on the Riverside 91 Express Lanes Beat No. 91‐T for a three‐year
term, and one two‐year option to extend the agreement, in an amount not
to exceed $1,205,000; and
4) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the
Commission.
8. TERMINATION OF SWAP AND REFUNDING OF 2009 SERIES A SALES TAX REVENUE
BONDS
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, presented the swap termination and the 2016
Series A Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds (2016 Refunding Bonds), highlighting the
following areas:
Interest rate swap considerations;
Synthetic fixed interest rate debt;
Integrated swap performance;
Swap status;
Deutsche Bank (DB) swap options;
2016 Refunding Bonds proceeds;
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 8
Swap termination and refunding transaction approvals; and
Next steps upon Commission approval: 1) Negotiate settlement with DB to
terminate the swap; 2) Conduct a competitive sale of the refunding bonds on
September 28; and 3) Sign closing documents on October 11 with the close on
October 12.
Commissioner Steven Hernandez expressed appreciation for a thorough presentation and
concurred with the direction the Commission is taking. He then asked about the
termination value to DB since DB’s rating obligations were not met and if there were some
lessons learned if the Commission were to invest in swaps in the future.
Ms. Trevino expressed this is the second time the Commission paid to terminate a swap
in which the Commission was not at fault. She discussed bond interest rates compared
to swap interest rates and the Commission’s position where there is a liability to pay even
though DB did not meet its obligations. She then discussed the Commission’s decision
process when it entered into the swap.
Dan Wiles, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. (Fieldman), explained how swaps are
structured.
In response to Commissioner Dana Reed’s request for clarification regarding all potential
conflicts listed on the Conflicts of Interest (COI) memorandum distributed to the
Commissioners, Theresia Trevino replied the swap advisor Riverside Risk Advisors
(Riverside Risk) was inadvertently omitted. Riverside Risk is a small consulting firm based
in New York and not a subsidiary to any other firm.
Commissioner Reed requested staff ensure all disclosures are provided in the COI
memorandum in order to minimize risks.
Anne Mayer concurred with Commissioner Reed’s comment.
In response to Commissioner Andrew Kotyuk’s questions regarding the impact to the
Commission if 1) there was an interest rate increase; 2) the Commission held the swap
for 6 to 12 months; and 3) there was investment rating movement.
Dan Wiles explained the possible impacts if each one of these scenarios occurred.
At Commissioner Kotyuk’s request, Dan Wiles clarified the termination fee is based on
interest movement, not on the credit rating.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 9
Anne Mayer stated staff spent the past four months carefully evaluating this matter in
consultation with the Commission’s experts and financial advisors. She expressed this
matter was presented to the Budget and Implementation Committee in June and August
and to the Commission in July, and recommends the Commission proceed.
Commissioner Kotyuk expressed appreciation for Ms. Mayer’s comments. He stated
there were a couple of issues on other agenda items at the Western Riverside County
Programs and Projects Committee meeting in August where Commissioners needed
additional information to better understand the agenda item and where the funds are
going, such as contingency amounts. Commissioner Kotyuk then asked staff or the
financial consultant to discuss the worst case scenario.
Dan Wiles stated the worst case scenario is DB folds and there is an immediate demand.
He explained the Commission would have to come up with the money immediately, which
commercial paper would be used and refinanced at the current market rate. He then
discussed the current proposal for effectively terminating the swap based on a set of
market values.
Theresia Trevino added there was a comment in Fitch’s rating report received yesterday
noting the Commission’s variable rate exposure would decrease to about 10 percent of
the Commission’s outstanding debt with this transaction.
Dan Wiles stated the recommended action will allow the Commission to move prudently,
avoiding a disaster kind of situation, with an opportunity to do a well thought out and
structured transaction in a favorable market environment and enable the Commission to
remove a bit of potential volatility from its financing program.
Commissioner Tavaglione stated the bond rating agencies have the utmost respect and
confidence in the Commission’s team and supported staff’s recommendation.
At Commissioner Kevin Jeffries’ request for clarification, Steve DeBaun, legal counsel,
replied there is no action to amend the Best Best and Krieger LLP contract so there is no
COI with regards to this agenda item.
Commissioner Jeffries stated he can proceed and vote.
At Commissioner Karen Spiegel’s request, Theresia Trevino discussed how the
Commission’s Debt Management Policy was applied to this matter, specifically “the
Commission’s main objectives in the sale of debt are to: obtain the lowest possible cost
of funds for each of the Commission’s borrowing programs; obtain the highest possible
credit ratings that allows such sufficient flexibility; and manage and minimize risk
exposure to variable rate debt and or derivatives.”
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 10
Dan Wiles added the termination value and the long term replacement debt will continue
to move as interest rates move. If the Commission does not act now then it is speculating
on the market, which is not the financial advisor’s advice.
M/S/C (Jeffries/Radi) to:
1) Receive and file the presentation regarding the termination of the
Deutsche Bank (DB) swap and related issuance of the 2016 Series A Sales
Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds (2016 Refunding Bonds);
2) Approve the termination of the forward interest rate swap with DB in the
currently outstanding notional amount of $63.9 million and at an
estimated termination cost of $10.7 million;
3) Approve the refunding of the 2009 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Variable
Rate Demand Bonds (2009 Bonds), currently outstanding in the amount
of $63.9 million and integrated with the DB swap;
4) Adopt Resolution No. 16‐015, “Resolution Authorizing the Issuance and
Sale of Not to Exceed $85,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of
Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), the Refunding of Outstanding
Bonds and Commercial Paper, the Execution and Delivery of a Sixth
Supplemental Indenture, a Notice of Sale Pursuant to Which Such Bonds
Are to Be Sold, an Official Statement and a Continuing Disclosure
Agreement, the Publication of a Notice of Intention to Sell, and the Taking
of All Other Actions Necessary in Connection Therewith”;
5) Approve the draft Official Statement for the issuance of not to exceed
$85 million in 2016 Refunding Bonds and authorize the Executive Director
to approve and execute the printing and distribution of the final Official
Statement;
6) Approve the draft Continuing Disclosure Agreement related to the 2016
Refunding Bonds between the Riverside County Transportation
Commission and Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., as dissemination
agent, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the
final Continuing Disclosure Agreement;
7) Approve the draft Sixth Supplemental Indenture for the 2016 Refunding
Bonds between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and
U.S. Bank National Association (US Bank), as Trustee, and authorize the
Executive Director to approve and execute the final Sixth Supplemental
Indenture;
8) Approve the draft Official Notice of Sale for the 2016 Refunding Bonds
and authorize the Chief Financial Officer to approve and execute the final
Official Notice of Sale;
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 11
9) Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to receive bids for the 2016
Refunding Bonds and award such bonds to the highest responsible bidder
resulting in the lowest true interest cost;
10) Approve the estimated costs of issuance of $375,000 to be paid from the
bond proceeds;
11) Award Agreement No. 17‐19‐006‐00 with Riverside Risk Advisors LLC
(Riverside Risk) for specialized swap advisory services related to the
termination of the DB swap through October 31, 2016, in the amount of
$11,000, plus a contingency amount of $4,000, for a total amount not to
exceed $15,000;
12) Approve Agreement No. 04‐19‐029‐10, Amendment No. 10 to Agreement
No. 04‐19‐029‐00, with Fieldman Rolapp & Associates, Inc. (Fieldman) for
financial advisory services related to the termination of the DB swap and
issuance of the 2016 Refunding Bonds for an additional amount not to
exceed $70,000;
13) Approve Agreement No. 05‐19‐510‐11, Amendment No. 11 to Agreement
No. 07‐31‐14‐00, with Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe LLP (Orrick) for bond
counsel services related to the termination of the DB swap and issuance
of the 2016 Refunding Bonds for an additional amount of $115,000 and a
total amount not to exceed $1,975,000;
14) Approve Agreement No. 09‐19‐072‐10, Amendment No. 10 to Agreement
No. 09‐19‐072‐00, with Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP (Norton Rose) for
disclosure counsel services related to the termination of the DB swap and
issuance of the 2016 Refunding Bonds for an additional amount of
$57,500 and a total amount not to exceed $637,600; and
15) Approve the revised Debt Management Policy.
No: Foat, Hernandez, Kotyuk, and Weill
At this time, Chair Matas left the meeting and Vice Chair John Tavaglione assumed the Chair.
9. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY DOWNTOWN RIVERSIDE PERRIS VALLEY LINE SHUTTLE
Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager, expressed appreciation to Riverside Transit Agency
(RTA) for partnering with the Commission. He then presented the Downtown Riverside
Perris Valley Line (PVL) shuttle, highlighting the following areas:
Identifying the service need;
A map depicting the proposed Route 54;
The proposed Route 54 schedule; and
Shuttle plan – Annual project costs, funding for the project, and FY 2016/17
budget and short range transit plan will be amended.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 12
At this time, Commissioners Berwin Hanna and Jeffries left the meeting.
In response to Commissioner Jesse Molina’s question regarding future shuttle routes,
Sheldon Peterson replied staff will continue to work with RTA to identify those routes.
When service was initiated, RTA setup shuttles in a number of different communities.
Commissioner Molina stated the city of Moreno Valley has employment centers near the
county hospital for future consideration.
Sheldon Peterson stated staff conducted outreach in that neighborhood as well as
March JPA and others to try to determine the employment base and how to best serve it.
In response to Commissioner Dawn Haggerty’s request for clarification, Sheldon Peterson
stated Metrolink added a $10 roundtrip Rams Train service to the 91 and Perris Valley
Lines for all of the team’s home games this season, which includes a shuttle.
M/S/C (Weill/Spiegel) to:
1) In partnership with the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), establish a new
Downtown Riverside Perris Valley Line (PVL) shuttle service;
2) Approve an increase of $225,000, in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budgeted
federal revenues and transit operating expenditures for the PVL shuttle
service; and
3) Amend the FY 2016/17 Commuter Rail Short Range Transit Plan to add
$225,000 in federal funds and operating cost for the shuttle service.
10. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Aaron Hake, External Affairs Director, presented an update on state and federal legislative
activities, highlighting the following areas:
Bills on Governor Brown’s Desk – AB 1943 (Linder) Sponsor; AB 2170 (Frazier)
Support; AB 626 (Chiu & Low); and AB 1889 (Mullin) Support; and
Cap and Trade deal – Governor and Legislature agreement and concern over
future of California’s Cap and Trade program, Transit and Intercity Rail Capital
program, and Affordable Housing/Sustainable Communities program.
At this time, Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director, presented the federal grants and
congratulated the city of Blythe (Blythe) and its transit partner Palo Verde Valley Transit
Agency for receiving a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Fostering Advancements in
Shipping and Transportation for the Long‐term Achievement of National Efficiencies
(FASTLANE) Grant in the amount of $185,000. The grant category is medical and health
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 13
wellness and Blythe is a very difficult location to serve for these type of trips. He discussed
the partnerships that helped contribute to these grant applications and the Commission
acted as the grant applicant and will administer it on behalf of Blythe. Mr. Yates stated
the Commission is contributing part of the local match with respect to establishing a
Google Transit feed, which represents a total project amount of approximately $311,000.
Commissioner Washington requested clarification on the opposition to Proposition 53
regarding the Governor’s plan to construct the master tunnel project to resolve the Bay
Delta water crisis.
Aaron Hake replied the list is quite extensive and he will verify which water agencies are
opposed.
Commissioner Joey DeConinck expressed appreciation to staff and discussed how this
program got started and all of the support it received.
M/S/C (Radi/Foat) to:
1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation;
2) Adopt the following bill positions:
a) AB 626 (Chiu and Low) – Oppose;
b) AB 1889 (Mullin) – Support; and
3) Oppose Proposition 53.
11. RECOGNITION OF THE COMMISSION’S 40TH ANNIVERSARY
John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director, recognized and presented the Commission’s
40th Anniversary, highlighting the following areas:
Where it all started – Created by state law in 1976; areas of responsibility and
administration; responsible for state highway coordination and short range transit
plans; and suggests a small staff;
The Commission’s first meeting minutes – January 13, 1977;
Initial member composition;
Responsibilities evolved due to Legislation; and
Events to commemorate the Commission’s 40th Anniversary:
o Open House Reception scheduled for September 29, 3 p.m. – 7 p.m.;
o Presentations at future Commission meetings;
o Special dinner at the January Commission Workshop; and
o Distribution of a commemorative book.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes
September 14, 2016
Page 14
Vice Chair Tavaglione noted one of the original Commissioners was Flora Spiegel,
Commissioner Karen Spiegel’s mother‐in‐law.
Mr. Standiford noted the first Chair was Russell Beirich, who was the mayor of the city of
Palm Springs and the Commission’s former Executive Director Eric Haley was also an
original member of the Commission as a councilmember from the city of Riverside.
M/S/C to receive as an information item.
12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION
There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar.
13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT
12A. Commissioner John Bulinski announced on September 1, Caltrans District 7
employee Jorge Lopez was struck and killed by a semi‐truck on SR‐14 in northern
Los Angeles County. It is important to remember to slow for the Cone Zone, be
work zone alert, and move over as it is the law. Mr. Bulinski asked everyone to
please keep Jorge and his family, friends, and coworkers in their prayers.
12B. Anne Mayer announced:
Staff efforts to reach out to the community members and schools to
discuss rail safety, including See Tracks, Think Trains banners posted
through Western County near rail crossing; and
Welcomed and introduced two new staff members – Gary Ratliff, Facilities
Administrator, and Jose Mendoza, Procurement Analyst.
13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation
Commission, Vice Chair Tavaglione adjourned the meeting at 11:15 a.m. The next
Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, October 12, 2016,
Board Room, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside.
Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer Harmon
Clerk of the Board
AGENDA ITEM 7
PRESENTATION
RCTC’s 40 th Anniversary
Spotlight
Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies
October 12, 2016
Reflecting on the Past
to Guide the Future
The History of Call
Boxes
•First Highway Call Box in California in
1962
•Legislature Created SAFE’s in 1985
•RCTC Becomes a SAFE in 1986
•Cooperation with SANBAG for initial
and ongoing implementation
•First Call Boxes Installed in 1990
What is a SAFE?
•Established by County Board of
Supervisors and City Councils
•Collects $1 surcharge from
vehicle registrations
•Can now fund other amenities
including:
–Changeable Message Signs
–Freeway Service Patrol
–Traffic Operations Centers
–511/Traveler Information
Upcoming Call Box
Challenges
•Can You Hear Me Now?
Technology changes and higher costs
ADA requirements
Dwindling Call Volume
Construction
Value of providing additional Freeway Service Patrols
The Good News!
•Help is on the way!
–Backbone call box network
–IE 511
–Freeway Service Patrol
AGENDA ITEM 8A
Agenda Item 8A
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: October 12, 2016
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee
Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director
THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Amendment to Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Investment Grade Traffic
and Revenue Study Services Agreement
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 15-31-048-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No.
15-31-048-00, with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) for investment grade
traffic and revenue study services for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project for an
additional amount of $199,400 and a total amount not to exceed $1,399,400; and
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute
the agreement on behalf of the Commission.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The I-15 Express Lanes project is part of the Commission’s 2009 Measure A Western Riverside
County Highway 10-Year Delivery Plan. The I-15 Express Lanes project will improve the I-15
freeway in northern Riverside County. The project will construct one to two tolled express
lanes in each direction between the I-15/Cajalco Road interchange in Corona and the I-15/State
Route 60 interchange just south of the Riverside/San Bernardino County line – approximately
15 miles. The tolled express lanes will be constructed in the existing I-15 freeway median and
are planned to open in 2020. Proposed roadway improvements are anticipated to be
constructed entirely within existing Caltrans freeway right of way with the majority of the
improvements occurring within the existing I-I5 median. The Commission will operate and
maintain the tolled express lanes after opening.
The current proposed project funding and financing plan consists of five key sources:
1) Toll Revenue Bonds – Issued by the Commission and repaid from project net toll
revenues.
1
Agenda Item 8A
2) Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Loan – Subordinate
debt to the toll revenue bonds to be obtained by the Commission from the U.S.
Department of Transportation TIFIA program and repaid from project net toll revenues.
3) Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Funds – Federal
grant funds supporting surface transportation projects that contribute air quality
improvements and provide congestion relief.
4) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Funds – Federal grant funds that provide flexible
funding to preserve and improve the condition and performance on any federal-aid
highway.
5) Measure A Sales Tax – To be funded both on a pay as you go basis and through Measure
A sales tax revenue bonds issued by the Commission.
The successful sale of toll revenue bonds and securing a federal TIFIA loan is dependent on
many factors including the preparation of an investment grade traffic and revenue study. This
study needs to support the Commission obtaining investment grade toll revenue bond ratings
from Moody’s Investor Service, Fitch Ratings, and/or Standard & Poor’s Rating Service. The
investment grade traffic and revenue study also supported the I-15 Express Lanes project toll
policy that was developed and ultimately approved by the Commission at its June 8, 2016
meeting.
At its April 8, 2015 meeting, the Commission approved the award of Agreement No. 15-31-048-
00 to Stantec for investment grade traffic and revenue study services for the I-15 Express Lanes
project in the amount of $1.1 million, plus a contingency amount of $100,000, for a total
amount not to exceed $1.2 million.
Stantec has made significant progress in completing the investment grade traffic and revenue
study and related services required for the successful sale of toll revenue bonds and to secure a
federal TIFIA loan. At its June 8, 2016 meeting, the Commission adopted the final investment
grade traffic and revenue study – a key milestone that sets the stage for the Commission
project financing completion in 2017.
Staff and Stantec have worked for several months to obtain an early bond rating known as an
indicative rating that is a necessary step of the federal TIFIA loan process. Obtaining this
indicative rating is a requirement in order to submit an early loan package to the federal TIFIA
office.
Significantly more effort by Commission staff, financial advisors, underwriters, and Stantec has
been required to obtain this indicative rating from Fitch Ratings. This additional effort was
needed for several reasons. First, the I-15 Express Lanes project investment grade traffic and
revenue results are receiving greater scrutiny than those from the 91 Project. This is mostly
due to the fact there is no express lane history on the I-15 corridor. The SR-91 corridor had
over 17 years of traffic and revenue data from the OCTA 91 Express Lanes to support the
Commission’s financing work in 2013.
2
Agenda Item 8A
Second, more extensive bond rating requirements have been imposed at this early stage of the
TIFIA process by Fitch Ratings versus those the Commission experienced as part of its 91 Project
financing in 2013. As a result of these bond rating requirements, extensive vetting of the traffic
and revenue study results by Fitch Ratings has required considerable time by Stantec to
respond to questions, gather more data, perform additional analyses, attend meetings, and
prepare formal and informal communication.
The indicative bond rating has now been obtained. An initial notice of the rating was provided
by Fitch Ratings on September 9, 2016.
Additional funds are now required to complete the remainder of Stantec’s scope of services
currently in its contract with the Commission. These remaining services are for the investment
grade stage of work in 2017 and are similar to those provided at the indicative rating stage just
completed.
Staff recommends the Commission approve Agreement No. 15-31-048-01, Amendment No. 1 to
Agreement No. 15-31-048-00, with Stantec for investment grade traffic and revenue study
services for the I-15 Express Lanes project for an additional amount of $199,400 and a total
amount not to exceed $1,399,400. Further, staff recommends the Commission authorize the
Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on
behalf of the Commission.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2016/17 Amount: $199,400
Source of Funds: Commercial Paper proceeds, 2009
Measure A Western County Highway Budget Adjustment: No
GL/Project Accounting No.: 003027 65520 00009 0000 262 31 65520
Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 09/13/2016
Attachment: Agreement No. 15-31-048-01 with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
3
17336.02101\29182988.1 1
Agreement No. 15 -31-048-01
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT
FOR
INVESTMENT GRADE TRAFFIC AND REVENUE
STUDY SERVICES FOR THE I-15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT
1. PARTIES AND DATE
This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Investment Grade Traffic and
Revenue Stud y Services for the I-15 Express Lanes Project is made and entered into
as of this ______ day of ___________, 2016 , by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (“Commission”) and STANTEC CONSULTING
SERVICES INC. ("Consultant"), a New York corporation.
2. RECITALS
2.1 Commission and Consultant have entered into that certain Agreement for
Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study Services for the I-15
Express Lanes Project , dat ed April 8, 2015 (the "Master Agreement").
2.2 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order to revise
the Scope of Services to provide additional traffic and revenue study
work necessary for the I-15 Express Lanes Project (the “Project”), to
revise the Sc hedule of Services, and to provide additional compensation
for the additional services.
3. TERMS
3.1 The Scope of Services for the Master Agreement shall be amended to
include Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement,
required to complete the traffic and revenue study work, as more fully
described in Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and incorporated
herein by reference.
3.2 The Services, as hereby amended, shall be performed expeditiously, in
accordance with the requirements for the Project. The Schedule of
4
17336.02101\29182988.1 2
Services set forth in Exhibit “A” of the Master Agreement is hereby
deleted. Upon request of Commission, Consultant shall prepare a more
detailed schedule for performance and completion of the Services
(“Schedule”). Once approved by Commission, Consultant shall complete
the Services in conformance with any such Schedule.
3.3 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this
Amendment shall be One Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand, Four Hundred
Dollars ($199,400), as further set forth in Exhibit "B" attached to this
Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. Work shall be
performed at the rates set forth in the Master Agreement.
3.4 The total compensation to be provided under the Master Agreement, as
amended by this Amendment, shall not exceed One Million, Two
Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars ($1,299,400).
3.5 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master
Agreement, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance
provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the
actions of the parties under this Amendment.
[Signatures on following page]
5
17336.02101\29182988.1 3
SIGNATURE PAGE
TO
AGREEMENT NO. 15-31-048-01
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on
the date first herein above written.
RIV ERSIDE COUNTY STANTEC CONSULTING
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SERVICES INC.
By: _____________________________ By : _____________________
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
Title: _____________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
By: _____________________________ By: ______________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Counsel to the Riverside County Its: ______________________
Transportation Commission
6
Exhibit A
17336.02101\29182988.1
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Project is currently in the process of obtaining an indicative rating from Fitch. The next major phases of the Project will be obtaining approval for TIFIA financing, obtaining a final rating from the rating agencies, and responding to investors. These phases of the Project will require Consultant to present assumptions and results of the I-15 ELP T&R study to TIFIA, the rating agencies, and investors, to test the I-15 ELP T&R under various alternative scenarios, and to respond to questions.
The indicative rating process for the Project has been far longer and required far more effort than originally anticipated. From start to end, the process of obtaining an indicative rating (still to be issued) has taken nearly 6 months, at a cost of over $100,000. Consultant participated in numerous conference calls, responded to numerous data requests, and conducted many more T&R sensitivities than anticipated for this indicative rating process. As a result, Consultant spent far more budget on this process than initially envisioned. A sample of the sensitivity trials that Consultant conducted, which are hereby incorporated into the Scope of Services, to the extent not already addressed in the Master Agreement, include:
1) Economic downside, version 1
2) Economic downside version 2
3) Value of time -10%
4) Value of time -20%
5) Value of time -30%
6) Value of reliability removed
7) Global traffic reduced
8) RCTC SR 91 express lanes not built
9) No induced demand in the I-15 corridor
10) Combined downside 1
11) Combined downside 2
12) Revenue maximization runs
13) Reduced revenue annualization factor with combined downside 1
14) Reduced revenue annualization factor with combined downside 2
The Scope of Services, as amended, shall include the additional effort required for conducting numerous T&R sensitivities, data requests, and attending meetings required for obtaining the final bond rating from the rating agencies, obtaining financing approval from TIFIA, and replying to investor inquiries.
7
Exhibit B
17336.02101\29182988.1
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION
8
AGENDA ITEM 8B
Agenda Item 8B
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: October 12, 2016
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee
Eric DeHate, Senior Management Analyst
Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director
THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Amendment to 91 Express Lanes RCTC-OCTA Facility Agreement
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 16-31-025-01, Amendment No. 1 to the 91 Express Lanes RCTC-
OCTA Facility Agreement No. 16-31-025-00, with the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) for the Corona Customer Service Center (CSC) in the additional
amounts of $50,000 for tenant improvements, $78,316 for rent, plus a contingency
amount of $6,416, for a total additional amount not to exceed $134,732;
2) Authorize Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the
agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency
amount as may be required for the project.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
In November 2015 the Commission approved an agreement that serves to facilitate
implementation of certain portions of the cooperative agreement between OCTA and the
Commission for the operation of the 91 Express Lanes. Section 2.7.2 of the cooperative
agreement established the Commission’s requirement to pay for improvements to the CSC
needed to accommodate additional staff as a result of the 91 Project and the sharing of the
lease costs after the RCTC 91 Express Lanes opening date.
The facility agreement anticipated an amendment would be required to address the build-out
of the existing CSC at 2275 Sampson Avenue, Suite 100 in Corona and the Commission’s share
of the building lease costs as of the opening date of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes.
The build-out is required to accommodate the additional Cofiroute USA, LLC staff that will
provide customer service as a result of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. It is projected 11 additional
9
Agenda Item 8B
staff will be required at the CSC to answer customer telephone calls and assist customers who
visit the walk-in center.
Improvements to the CSC will include the following:
• Power, lighting, data, and communications;
• Additional security cameras;
• Sound masking system;
• Additional cubicles and existing cubicle relocation;
• Shelving and cabinet relocation; and
• Server room cable management and heat loading review.
OCTA holds a lease with CPI Properties (CPI) for the CSC. OCTA is prepared to have CPI perform
the tenant improvements at the CSC. The estimated cost of the tenant improvements is not to
exceed $50,000.
The existing CSC lease agreement between OCTA and CPI extends through September 30, 2018,
and is included as an attachment to this report. The Commission’s obligation to pay its share of
the rent begins on the opening date of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. An early 2017 opening
would result in approximately 20.5 months of lease payments at a cost of approximately
$78,316. The estimated costs include the base lease amount and common area maintenance
expenses.
Staff is requesting approval of an amendment to the facility agreement in the amount of
$50,000 for tenant improvements, $78,316 for lease payments, and $6,416 for a 5 percent
contingency for a total amount of $134,732.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes
N/A Year: FY 2016/17
FY 2017/18+ Amount: $70,943
$63,789
Source of Funds: Toll Bond Operations and Maintenance
funds and Toll Revenues Budget Adjustment: No
N/A
GL/Project Accounting No.: 003028 81301 00000 0000 262 31 81301 (Tenant Improvements)
009199 73001 00000 0000 591 31 73001 (Lease Payments)
Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 09/13/2016
Attachments:
1) Draft Agreement 16-31-025-01
2) CSC Lease Agreement
10
1
17336.02100\29180110.2
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO 91 EXPRESS LANES
RCTC- OCTA FACILITY AGREEMENT
(“ROFA”)
This Amendment No. 1 to 91 Express Lanes RCTC-OCTA Facility Agreement
No. 16-31-025-00 (“Amendment No. 1”) is made and entered into this _____ day of _________
2016 by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (“RCTC”) and the
Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”). RCTC and OCTA are sometimes referred
to herein individually as "Party", and collectively as the "Parties".
Recitals
A. RCTC and OCTA previously entered into that certain RCTC-OCTA Facility
Agreement (“ROFA”) dated November 24, 2015, to set forth the rights and obligations of the
Parties related to the lease, expansion, and joint use of the Toll Operations Center, as that term is
defined in the ROFA.
B. The ROFA anticipated that an amendment would be required to address the build -
out of the Customer Services Center, as that term is defined in the ROFA, and CSC lease
payments, both of which are the purpose of this Amendment No. 1.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, it is mutually understood and agreed as follows:
1.Defined Terms.
A. For the purposes of this Amendment No. 1, the following terms shall have the
meanings hereinafter provided:
(i) CAM Expenses . The term “CAM Expenses” shall mean and refer to the
proportionate share of certain estimated operating expenses, tax expenses, utilities costs, and
other charges which are determined by Landlord in accordance with the terms of the CSC Lease.
(ii) CS C Lease . The term “CSC Lease” shall mean and refer to that certain
Office Lease between OCTA and C.P.I. Properties for the CSC dated April 14, 2003, as
amended, a copy of which is on file at the offices of the Parties and is incorporated herein by
reference, as it may be amended in the future. The current term of the CSC Lease ends on
September 30, 2018.
(iii) Landlord. The term “Landlord” shall mean and refer to C .P.I. Properties,
LLC, the limited liability company that is the landlord under the CSC Lease.
ATTACHMENT 1
11
2
17336.02100\29180110.2
(iv) Premises . The term “Premises” shall mean and refer to the CSC, which
consists of approximately 4,285 rentable square feet and approximat ely 3,792 usable square feet.
(v) Tenant Improvements . The term “Tenant Improvements” shall mean
and refer to the build-out of the CSC as required for joint use of the CSC by RCTC and OCTA,
and does not include any betterments requested by OCTA.
B. Any term used herein with initial capitalized letters and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning set forth in the ROFA.
C. Any term used herein with initial capitalized letters and not otherwise defined in
the ROFA shall have the meaning set forth in the Cooperative Agreement.
2. CSC Build-Out/ Construction of Tenant Improvements.
A. Implementation Plan. The Tenant Improvements are generally set forth in that
certain Corona Customer Service Center Facility Build -Out Implementation Plan prepared by the
PCM, dated ___________, 2016, a copy of which is on file with each of the Parties, and is
incorporated herein by reference (“Implementation Plan”). OCTA has approved and concurs
with the Implementation Plan.
B. Final Plans. RCTC shall work with Landlord on (a) design of the Tenant
Improvements, (b) preparation of construction drawings for the Tenant Improvements, (c)
selection and retention of a contractor for construction of the Tenant Improvements , (d)
development and approval of a work schedule and c ost proposal for construction and installation
of the Tenant Improvements, and (e) payment for the design and construction of the Tenant
Improvements (“Final Plans”).
C. Agreement for Tenant Improvements. To the extent required by Landlord, RCTC
shall work with Landlord to develop an agreement to be entered into by and between OCTA and
Landlord for the Tenant Improvements (“TI Agreement”). The TI Agreement shall be in a form
reasonably acceptable to OCTA.
D. Approval. OCTA agrees that it will not exercise any rights of OCTA under any
TI Agreement without the prior approval of RCTC.
E. Cost of Tenant Improvements. In accordance with Section 2.7.3(a) of the
Cooperative Agreement, RCTC shall be responsible for all costs incurred for the design and
construction of the Tenant Improvements. The amount of such costs has not been definitively
determined as of the date of this ROFA Amendment No. 1; however, it is preliminarily estimated
by the Parties that the Tenant Improvements, including contingency, will not exceed the amount
of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000).
F. Remittance of Funds to OCTA. RCTC shall immediately remit to OCTA in
immediately available funds all amounts due for the Tenant Improvements in accordance with
the Final Plans, and any TI Agreement.
12
3
17336.02100\29180110.2
3. No OCTA Betterments . The Parties recognize and agree that OCTA has not requested
any betterments to the CSC.
4. CSC Lease
A. Rent. In accordance with the Cooperative Agreement, following the Opening
Date, all costs for rent payable under the CSC Lease for the entire Premises will be shared by the
Parties in accordance with the Percentage Cost Split. The Parties acknowledge and agree that
“Rent” payable under the CSC Lease includes base rent (for which a schedule is included in the
CSC Lease) and additional rent (CAM Expenses which are subject to change, estimated on an
annual basis and paid in monthly installments along with the base rent). RCTC’s estimated
proportionate share of the Rent for the CSC from the anticipated Opening Date through
September 30, 2018 is Seventy Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Sixteen Dollars ($78,316).
The Parties acknowledge that the foregoing estimate is subject to change based on the actual
Opening Date, changes in the amount of estimated CAM Expenses and other unforeseen
expenses.
B. Payment of Rent; Late Fees. Pursuant to the CSC Lease, all monthly Rent
amounts (including the base rent and the monthly ins tallment of CAM Expenses) are payable on
or before the first day of each month. RCTC shall pay to OCTA its proportionate share, based
on the Percentage Cost Split, of all monthly Rent or other charges imposed by the Landlord on or
before the date such Rent or other charges are due from OCTA to the Landlord. If any such
payment for monthly Rent or other charges due from RCTC is not received by OCTA on or
before the date such Rent or other charges are due from OCTA to Landlord, in addition to any
other remedies OCTA may be entitled to, RCTC shall pay OCTA a late charge equal to ten
percent (10%) of the amount due. In addition to such a late charge, any amounts owing from
RCTC to OCTA hereunder which are not paid by the date they are due shall thereafter bear
interest until paid at the interest rate described in Section 13.5 of the CSC Lease.
C. Termination of Rent Obligation. In the event of termination of the Cooperative
Agreement by RCTC during the term of the CSC Lease, and provided that RCTC has abandoned
use of the Premises, RCTC’s obligation to OCTA for payment of Rent shall terminate.
5. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all
provisions of the ROFA shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
6. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in duplicate originals, each of
which is deemed to be an original, but when taken together shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.
13
4
17336.02100\29180110.2
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
91 EXPRESS LANES RCTC-OCTA FACILITY AGREEMENT (“ROFA”)
BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
AND
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORANGE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
By: By: _______________________
Its: _________________________ Its: _______________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART,
APC
By: ____________________________ By: _______________________
Counsel to the Riverside General Counsel to Orange
County Transportation Commission County Transportation
Authority
14
,-
-ft
C-3-0486
STANDARD MULTI-TENANT OFFICE LEASE-GROSS
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION
'J is .. lutft~·i
1-\ccoun\.mQ
l . Huntet
~,., . Busin ess
i '~P t
• '?:!'>'~:')!
1. Basic Provisions ("Basic Provisions"). . ,lt)TI<
1.1 Parties: This Lease ("Lease"), dated for reference purposes only _.;;.;A:.:p..=r:..:i:..:l::__l;::....:.4_,_,--=2:...:0:...:0:..:3:::..._ __________ ~, Is made
by and between C. P. I. Properties
____ __;_ _______________________________________ ("Lessor")
andOrange County Transportation Authority
--------------------("Lessee"), (collectively the "Parties", or ind ividually a "Party").
1.2(a) Premises : That certain portion of the Project (as defined below), known as Suite Numbers(s) _..:1:.:0:..:0:::..._ ___________ ,
One ( 1) floor(s), consisting of approximately 4, 285 rentable square feet and approximately --=3'-''-7:....9::..;2=-------
useable square feet("Premlses"). The Premises are located at: 227 5 Sampson Avenue ,In the City of
--=C:...:o-=r:...:o:..:n"-'a=------------' County of Riverside , State of California
with zip code 92879 . In addition to Lessee's rights to use and occupy the Premises as hereinafter specified, Lessee shall have non-exclusive
rights to the Common Areas (as defined In Paragraph 2. 7 below) as hereinafter specified, but shall not have any rights to the roof, the exterior walls, the area
above the dropped ceilings, or the utility raceways of the building containing the Premises ("Building") or to any other buildings in the Project. The
Premises , the Building, the Common Areas , the land upon which they are located , along with all othe r buildings and improvements thereon, are herein
collectively referred to as the "Project." The Project consists of approximately 3 0, 6 9 3 rentable square feet. (See also Paragraph 2)
1.2(b) Parking : 16 stalls unreserved and Landlord will .provide at least 5 non-exclusive visitor
stalls for use by all tenant's visitors near the front entrance to the building.
reserved vehicle parking spaces .at a monthly cost of $ _______ per unreserved space and $ _______ per reserved space. (See
Paragraph 2.6)
1.3 Term : Five ( 5) years and _____ -_0_-_______ months ("Original Term") commendng
October l, 2003 ("Commencement Date") and ending _..:::.S..;;;e.J;C.p-=t-=e:.:.:mb=.:e;;.;;r:......;3;;...0::...!..-, _2;::....:.0-=0-=8 ______________ _
("Expiration Date"). (See also Paragraph 3)
1.4 Early Possesslon :_..::T:-=:e:-:.n;;.;;a:.:nc.:.;t=-..:::s.:.:h:.=a:.::l:.::l::....;b::.:e=---=a:.:l:..:l=-o::.:w:.:..::e..::d___:e::.:a=r=l...z.v_o=c-=c-=u:.cp:.:a:.:.n.:.:c=-y~.--..:f:..:o::.:r:::..._..:t:.:e::.:l:..:e::.:c::.o=m___:c::.o::.:.:n.:.:n:..:e:..:::c::.:t:.:i:..:o::.:n=s---=a::.:n:.:.d~
.::f.::ic.:.;x;..:t;..:u:.:r:..:i::..:z::..:a=-t.=..~::.· o.::..n:..:_-=a-=f-=t-=e-=r:........:9:....:/....:1::.:/'--0-=-=-3..:... -------------("Early Possession Date"). (See also Paragraphs 3.2 and 3.3)
1.5 Base Rent S_7_,_,..cc0_7-'0'-._2~5 _____ per month ("Base Rent)", payable on the First (1st) day of each month
commencing October 1, 2003 . (See also Paragraph 4)
0 If this box is checked, there are provisions in this Lease for the Base Rent to be adjusted l;ly 3'Yo annually so rent will ve ac:ljue;ted ae; followe;:
Year 2 = $7,282.36/Month
Year 3 = $7,500.83/Month
Year 4 = $7,725.85/Month
Year 5 = $7,957.63/Month.
1.6 Lessee's Share of Operating Expense Increase: Thirteen point six eight percent (13. 68 %) ("Lessee's
Share"). lessee's Share has been calculated by dividing the approximate rentable square footage of the Premises by the total approximate square footage
of the rentable space contained in the Project and shall not be subject to revision except in connection with an actual change in the size of the Premises or a
change in the space available for lease in the Project.
1. 7 Base Rent and Other Monies Paid Upon Execution:
(a) Base Rant $7, 07 0 . 25 for the period October 1, 2003-0ctober 31, 2003
(b) Security DepC?slt : $6, 930.00 ("Security Deposit"). (See also Paragraph 5)
(c) Parking: $ N/ A forthe period------------------------
(d) Other:$ N/A for ________________________ _
(e) Total Due Upon Execution of this Lease: $.::1-=4_,_,...:0.....:0;...;0:.....'-'2"-5.:;.._ ___________ _
1.8 Agreed Use: General offices and other legally permitted non-retail use with office
buildings of comparable guality. No training, school, telemarketing or "executive suite"
uses. . (See also Paragraph 6)
1.9 Base Year; Insuring Party . The Base Year is --=2;..::0.....:0:...:3:...._ __ . Lessor is the "Insuring Party•. (See also Paragraphs 4.2 and 8)
1.10 Real Estate Brokers: (See also Paragraph 15)
(a) Representation : The following real estate brokers ( the "Brokers") and brokerage relationships exist In this transaction (check
applicable boxes):
D
D
0
----------------------------represents Lessor exclus ively ("Lessor's Broker");
----------------------------represents Lessee exclusively ("Lessee's Broker"); or
CB Richard Ellis-Vindar Batoosingh/Philip Woodford represents both Lessor and Lessee ("Dual Agency").
(b) Payment to Brokers: Upon execution and delivery or this Lease by bolh Part ies , Lessor shall pay to the Brokers the brokerage fee
agreed to in a separate written agreement (or if there is no such agreement, the sum of per separate agreement or %
of the total Base Rent for the brokerage services rendered by the Brokers) .
. 1.11 Guarantor. The obligations of the lessee under this Lease shall be guaranteed by------------------
--------------------("Guarantor"). (See also Paragraph 37)
1.12
and 8: 00
Business Hours for the Building: 7: 00 a.m. to 6: 00 p.m., Mondays through Fridays (except Building Holidays)
a.m . to 1: 00 p.m. on Saturdays (except Building Holidays). "Building Holidays" shall mean the dates of observation of New
Year's Day , Pres ident's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, labor Day , Thanksg iving Day, Chrislmas Day, and any other federal
holiday.
1.13 Lessor Supplied Services . Notwithstanding the prov isions of Paragraph 11 .1. Lessor is NOT ob li gated to provide the following :
0 Janitorial services
Initials
@ 1999-American Industrial Real Estate Association
Page 1 of 12
REVISED
Initials
FORM OFG -1-9/99E
ATTACHMENT 2
15
" ~ , � e t . e c t r i ~ : t y '